tcapelle/kaggle-toxic-annotated-filtered · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 6 5k	racial_origin int64 0 3	gender_sex int64 0 3	religion int64 0 3	ability int64 0 3	violence int64 0 3
VHEMT (Shanoman) I responded to you question on my talk page.	0	0	0	0	0
" Dates on Jinnah's article Could you explain why you consider the month/day format for the dates to be ""established"" when the day/month format is used throughout all other South Asian articles and nearly all articles not from the Americas? "	0	0	0	0	0
" Regarding your POV edits to Ibn Khaldun's article He says himself in his autobiography that he's in fact an Arab, you said ""stop deleting cited information""? Please follow your own advice. "	1	0	0	0	0
suport it belongs along with the more poorly documented and biased exersise reports, clearly this shoud remain with the comparative section.	0	0	0	0	0
. The dispute over the statement in the intro remains. Unless I see it qualified in some way, the tag will stay	0	0	0	0	0
" You are making a value judgement about the term; that is editorialising. The ""Final Solution"" clearly is a euphemism for extermination. ( @) "	1	0	0	0	1
Ok.... Bitch i swear to God i will fuckin beat your face now itz n and poppin i swear i noe blodds crips and all dem niggaz start wit me again ya dumbass bitch i swear i will beat ur mutha fuckin brain in iight bitch get ba to ur hooked on phonics	3	3	0	0	3
People magazine, umm yeah, no, that does not meet WP:MEDRS.	0	0	0	0	0
last time go suck a cock	0	2	0	0	1
Whatt a jew Make real articles, not stupid speedy dleteion you jew.	3	0	3	0	2
" 'This is SPARTA! . You will be encouraged to edit the next time you add truth a page, as you did with to Chuck Norris. — norris "	0	0	0	0	0
, and my faculty advisor, a Stanford graduate like my father, who also designed the first cost-effective semiconductor memory.	0	0	0	0	0
One Night in Japan You can edit in this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Night_In_Japan	0	0	0	0	0
Please read User_talk:Mcaplan243#March_2008_2 and take it seriously.	0	0	0	0	0
The issue will be solved, it's just a matter of time.	0	0	0	0	0
" Uninitiated variables can also be avoided by a simple assignment statement, like X=3. Would you call that a ""default"" ? "	0	0	0	0	0
occupation of supporters can i ask what the ocupation of the supporters has to to with the article and in particular the specific occupations stated. i feel that by listing lawyers and academics but not taxi drivers and primary school teachers it sounds like the movement is the preserve of intelectuals. which i feel is false.	0	0	0	0	0
REDIRECT Talk:Hannah Hodson (actress)	0	0	0	0	0
"No one has ""forced"" you to be the small person you are who finds it necessary to stick your nose where it doesn't belong and into affairs about which you have no knowledge. Not sure how you live with yourself. "	0	0	0	0	1
Editor issue I noticed you have had a bit of a problem on the Seymour Hersh page with some recent edits. Myself and another editor have had issues with the same person on other pages and have recently submitted a sockpuppet investigation request. I thought I might point it out to you, as I noticed the edits on Hersh were involved. The sockpuppet page is at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dooyar, if you have any comments or input. Thanks.	0	0	0	0	0
" Question Arky...quick question. When I look at your talk page, you have a large smiley face floating on the left side of my screen, covering up the WP nav buttons. Is this a function of the fact that I'm on a wide screened laptop or is it where you want it to be? T/C "	0	0	0	0	0
2006 (UTC) At this point, the entire article is unsourced. 14:30, 3 November	0	0	0	0	0
Merge 2015 Can we just redirect it to Vampire already? It's never been a separate topic. It should get one sentence in the real article about how the werewolf stories sometimes get mixed. This is a lot of verbiage for nothing.	0	0	0	0	0
" ""IF"" is right. There's really nothing more left to put on a script that hasn't already been said or done, other than another apocalyptic movie, that somehow involved dinosaurs; leading to his statement on making a 'spin off' - Steven needs to wise up and stop waiting. (mailbox) "	0	0	0	0	0
" Move mistakes Hi there. You mistakenly moved all the ""1. deild 19XX"" season articles to ""Faroe Islands Premier League Football 19XX"", even though the league was indeed called 1. deild until 2004. If you're going to make mass moves in future, please ensure that you're certain that you are moving them to the right titles - it's going to take me around 20 minutes to move them all back (for a second time). Cheers, 57 "	0	0	0	0	0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxing_News http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/rankings/ If Mac Dreamstate seriously belives his six sources (which contradict his own format anyway) are more credible than Boxing News then he obviously must know nothing about boxing and shouldn't even be commenting on the issue. Clown.	0	0	0	1	1
Then, what is their company [incorporation and registration] number with Companies House, as an incorporated private limited company limited by guarantee rather than by shares and with no share capital (£1 (GBP 1)-guarantee per member)? If they are not actually registered with Companies House, as far as I am concerned, they don't actually exist, at least not in England and Wales!	0	0	0	0	0
" How are we going to have more people join if we don't let anyone know. there are very few people looking at it. Probably just me and you? (leave me a message!) "	0	0	0	0	0
Please do not edit other people's user pages Please do not edit other people's user pages. Feel free to report it to other admins (except the one who is involved in it) if you would like.	0	0	0	0	0
"::Thanks, Hnsampat. Drmargi can lick it. Times of London not a reliable source? Lick it. Stuff it and lick it. By the way, it was stolen from the Jungle Brothers: ""Africa 'cause AfriCAN!!!"" "	2	0	0	0	2
I am not vandalizing anything. I am being serious this time, I apologize for everything I did. If i offended you in anyway, I am sorry. I do not want to get blocked. I have only been on here for like two or three days and people are already starting to hate me and one person says I'm harrassing him. I'm not harrassing anyone. Please don't block me. By the way, I promise I will not make ANY more edits to Wikipedia. -Mariolyrics4evr	0	0	0	0	0
If you want to comment above, go ahead. Whoh. There is something wrong with the sources in use. The AP article would be fine if talking about Prop 37, but using it as a source of scientific consensus is utterly absurd.	0	0	0	0	0
Your Abuse Response Filing Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from 92.5.198.12 .	0	0	0	0	0
"==Regarding edits made during March 4 2007== Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. '''''' (o rly?) "	0	0	0	0	0
" Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Winchester, Massachusetts, you will be blocked from editing. Will (aka ) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice"	0	0	0	0	0
" I'm not proposing a total rewrite, just to condense the main points so you don't have to remove that one paragraph in its entirety. I'm proposing Ling.Nut-Lite. I just don't think removing that whole paragraph is the best solution. I want to condense it to just the main points, leaving certain details for further discussion in the body. Here's what I propose so far: The Six Day War or June War..., also known as the 1967 Arab-Israeli war or the Third Arab-Israeli War, was fought between 5 June and 10 June, 1967 by Israel and the neighboring states of Egypt [then the United Arab Republic, UAR], Jordan, and Syria. At the war's end, Israel had seized the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt, the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria. After the 1956 Suez Crisis, Egypt agreed to the stationing of a United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF) in the Sinai to ensure compliance with the armistice agreement and prevent raids across the border . On 4 November 1966, Syria signed a mutual defense agreement with Egypt. Nine days later, Israel attacked the city of as-Samu in the Jordanian occupied West Bank in response to raids from the fedayeen group Fatah. King Hussein of Jordan criticized President Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt for failing to come to Jordan's aid and ""hiding behind UNEF skirts"" [I checked Oren p. 135 and there's no mention of this on that page; please help double check source and find reference - possible later printing is different, I have 2003 first edition]. On 14 May 1967, Nasser began sending Egyptian forces into the Sinai Peninsula. Two days later he requested and obtained the withdrawal of UNEF from Egyptian territory. Israel rejected a proposal to restation UNEF on its side of the border. Egyptian forces replaced UNEF positions at Sharm el-Sheikh in the southern Sinai overlooking the Straits of Tiran. Between 18 and 20 May Israel reiterated declarations made in 1957 that any closure of the Straits would be considered as a cassus belli, or justification for war. Nasser declared the Straits closed to Israeli shipping on 22-23 May. On 1 June, Israel formed a National Unity Government by widening its cabinet, and on 4 June the decision was made to go to war. The next morning, Israel launched Operation Focus, a large-scale surprise air strike that was the opening of the Six Day War. I think following this, since the lede really only mentions the war between Israel and Egypt, there should be a brief discussion of the Jordan and Syria fronts, as well. With this slimmer version, it should be possible to fit that in, at least briefly. Let me know what you think. "	0	0	0	0	0
No one is allowed to delete anything from my talk page!	0	0	0	0	0
"Thank you for experimenting with the page User:VanessaLuver4Ever on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. "	0	0	0	0	0
hello sineed i am the person trying to update the sweet relief page. i am the communications director for the charity and I am using copy from various press and info pieces i have written. the only copy/paste i used was the supporter list. you folks are amazing at this wiki stuff. i am trying. i would really like to see some of the info i entered back on. your last edit looked good. what do you think? tylerjamesmax	0	0	0	0	0
" It's fine except ""gathered an army of 10,000 soldiers"" suggests a traditional aermy, mercenaries etc., but his army was an army of converts, which is a central point. I suspect that the intent of ""followers"" was really to imply this. I'd suggest ""...gathered an army of 10,000 followers..."" or even ""gathered a Muslim army of 10,000 soldiers..."" "	0	0	0	0	0
" First of all, congratulations on the Good Article status. Nice work. Since you don't object, I have added that section back to Little Boy. That action should not affect its good article status. Here is my reasoning. That particular bomb design is uniquely associated with the Hiroshima bombing, which, in turn, was largely a public weapon effects demonstration. Its purpose was to show that a single bomb could duplicate the effects of, say, the Tokyo firebombing which required 279 airplanes and 1,700 tons of bombs. Hiroshima was spared any earlier bombing in order to serve as a pristine nuclear bomb target, a situation made possible by its lack of importance as a military target. The two airplanes that accompanied Enola Gay were there to measure the weapon effects. Nobody expected the loss of Hiroshima to tip the balance in favor of immediate surrender. The ""shock and awe"" was expected to come from observing that it was effect of a single bomb. Most of what we know about nuclear weapon effects comes from an intensive study of Hiroshima. It was flat urban terrain well protected by natural and artificial firebreaks, and it was enough larger than the total destruction area that the margins of the effects could be precisely measured. Nothing new was learned from Nagasaki, and no other bombs were tested on live urban targets. In the many test explosions that followed, large and small, the overpressure and thermal impulse contours were measured, and the Hiroshima effects were extrapolated to estimate the theoretical destruction area. Granted, it was pure happenstance that Little Boy, and not Fat Man, was used at Hiroshima, but since it was this discussion of weapon effects seems appropriate here. "	0	0	0	0	1
For once I agree with Adam. I'll go ahead and write the article.	0	0	0	0	0
Hi hi! Not sure if I'm doing this correctly, but I needed to comment on someone's page for class and you were right below me!	0	0	0	0	0
" Speedy deletion of Brainchild Studios A tag has been placed on Brainchild Studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. (talk • contribs) "	0	0	0	0	0
Wow! I just had a look at the work you've done on the Guantanamo Bay prisoners, and all I have to say is .... Wow! I am so very impressed with what you have done and how you've kept your cool. This is the sort of thing that gives me hope for Wikipedia. Again, good luck to you and maybe someday I'll be able to help.	0	0	0	0	0
" February 2011 Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ruby Bridges. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 1994 "	0	0	0	0	0
Since I posted here, the comment has to stay. Since what began the post is spam, it has been struck off.	0	0	0	0	0
" And read WP:RS, WP:V. Also, about his Slovak origin: Wikipedia:Fringe theories. 100000000000000000000000000000 english references which say he was Hungarian, one (english?) that he was Slovak...9 "	1	0	0	0	0
Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! I would encourage you to read WP:NPOV to make sure you understand Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Some of your edits to Criticism of Mormonism were marginally POV - not enough for me to revert, but leaning towards a biased position. It is important to separate our beliefs from the verifiable facts of an issue. Again, I don't believe you crossed the line, but you seemed pretty close to it. Once again, thank you for helping make Wikipedia a better place, and I hope to see you contribute more in the future. (Talk)	0	0	1	0	0
In response to GM, in the 5th c. Persia's king attacked Armenia to strengthen his control. Yet Armenia was not independent of Persia, and if I stated otherwise, I would be branded a nationalist. Local authorities tend to act independently as central authority weakens, yet this alone doesn't establish an independent state. If Persia recognized khan as independent, or if the khan defeated Persia's attacking force, it might constitute establishment of independent statehood.	0	0	0	0	0
" I started Jump (Rihanna song). Feel free to start editing, just open the talk and there's the treasure ;) !— (T2ME) "	0	0	0	0	0
Happy birthday to Andrew Frank Hatch age 117 if you go by Social Security or 111 if you go by the 1940 census . Either one still a major achievement for a man.	0	0	0	0	0
" Then expect a WP:BOOMERANG unless you or someone else proves your WP:ASPERSIONS. "	0	0	0	0	1
need a disambiguation page	0	0	0	0	0
" Cleaning up citations I decided to trim two of the three cite tags and removed them. I doubt they would be missed. As for the third cite tag, I really think ""In addition, the exchange rate between ruble and USD is not adequately giving a real comparison to what the costs for Russia really are."" isn't needed, and is in violation of WP:OR. I hesitate on this last one only because it was Citation Needed this year instead of years ago. Cold7Realm, I know you suggested I wait, but I didn't trim out too much and thought this might be acceptable. Please revert if you disagree. "	0	0	0	0	0
So why is it you alone who is right and the other ten people who don't agree with you are wrong? Who do you think you are? I am glad you are starting to show the editors what a nutcase you are with the toothbrush comment	0	0	0	1	1
Are people discriminated because they are members of cults? I admit that this may happen in a few cases some countries, but I think this is an exception.	0	0	1	0	0
I voted delete on this issue but it has only recently been brought to my attention, by accident, that the article was not deleted, even though there was a majority to do so. I find it puzzling such a decision has been reached. There are a number of anomalies in the VfD process which needs reviewing. I will bring them up on the VfD discussion page.	0	0	0	0	0
I am a woman but I look like a man, therefore I am a transsexual woman. After SRT I will still be a woman and look like a woman, therefore I will just be a (former transsexual) woman.	0	1	0	0	0
March 2015 (UTC) 22:12, 10	0	0	0	0	0
July 2006 (UTC) Thanks for fixing it. 05:29, 8	0	0	0	0	0
Bullshit= There was no violation, you removed factual material. Ditto again the above statement. I have also informed Wikipedia's administrators of your persistent attempts to insert subjective material into this article, in violation of WP:NPOV. Ditto to that There was no violation, you removed factual material. Greetings. Uncyclopedia is not associated with Wikimedia, and continuing to insert this false information is considered vandalism. Also, please heed Codeine's warnings about NPOV; opinions do not belong in Wikipedia articles. Thanks, (spill yours?) Bullshit There is a connection between Wikia and Wikimedia, Wikia pwns Uncyc. Sorry, loyalist. Your edit to Uncyclopedia Your recent edit to Uncyclopedia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. ''' for frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // =	0	0	0	0	1
user:Bbb23 Well my submission are being kept deleted and I am extremely discouraged to make any further. Last time I followed appropriate steps and submission speedily deleted. Draft-Get help from chat-Once chat says ready submit draft- and the rest is article accepted by editors. And my ignorance is I am asking at the chat that article is why heavily modified. If I did not mention in chat, It will not be tagged deletation and will not get deleted because It was approved and edited by	0	0	0	0	0
Jesse Ragan deletion nomination Hi, I have received notice that the page I began about Jesse Ragan has been nominated for deletion based upon suspicion it is a vanity article. First, I am not the man (assuming Jesse ragan is male), nor have I met him/her. I began the article because as a professor of typography I felt Ragan's work significant, and that s/he had achieved work of lasting merit fairly early in life. S/he has been several time recognized by the American Institute of Graphic Arts (AIGA) (the national professional organization for graphic designers), Ragan's work has appeared in respected design periodicals, and has lectured on typography at several Association of Independent Colleges of Art and Design (AICAD) institutions. Several days ago I noticed removal of Ragan's name from credits for typefaces on the Tobias Frere-Jones article. My first thought was that some disagrement might have occured between Ragan and his former employers Hoefler & Frere-Jones, perhaps leading to a nomination for deletion. Mr. Hoefler wrote to me publicly on my talk page that Jesse Ragan was only one of many who worked on the project. That may be the case, but that would not discredit typefaces Ragan has produced entirely on his own, or the two mentions of his contributions to the Archer typeface on the AIGA web site. Clearly, at some point someone at Hoefler & Frere-Jones thought Ragan's contributions significant enough to provide his/her name (and not the rest of that team) to our national professional organization. The fact that Mr./Ms. Ragan is now independent and a competitor to other type foundries might be a part of this. But I have no knowledge of this. I know none of these people personally, and I respect the work of all of them as a review of my edit history will suggest. My primary reason for beginning the article was to increase the number of articles on typeface designers, and a secondary desire to increase the number of typography related articles in general. Jesse Ragan's work is very solid, even his/her own direct client list is impressive. In the world of typography, apprentices are historically given credit, witness Francesco Griffo who apprenticed to Aldus Manutius. It is my hope that Wikipedia will continue to make some room for subjects that though not block buster in scale are significant.	0	0	0	0	0
" Re: Coordinator Elections! Well, while I've been a bit tardy these recent times, yes, I will probably stand again now that the pressures of life are easing off! I'm also going to put in some graft and finish the last chunks of my pet project, Military history of New Zealand. Good luck to you! e "	0	0	0	0	0
" Exactly why this article should be deleted Since some editors have deplorable difficulty understanding (as ITAQALLAH laments ""but on the talk page never explains in detail how the content is in accordance with policy, and ignores any policies that I may cite"") why this article deserves to be deleted, I will once more explain now being very precise and exact so that you may be cleared of all doubts. The article (in its post-censorsed state) is in violation of WP:BLP. Let me quote from it: Editors must take particular care adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States and to all of our content policies, especially: Neutral point of view (NPOV) Verifiability No original research This article violates requirement number One: Neutral point of view (NPOV) Now for idiotic editors (like those who childishly colour their usernames) who will have difficulty comprehending how on earth this article violates NPOV (owing to their idiocy, which I hope Eugenics will fix one day) let me quote section 2.5 from the NPOV page: Balance When reputable sources contradict one another, the core of the NPOV policy is to let competing approaches exist on the same page: work for balance, that is: describe the opposing viewpoints according to reputability of the sources, and give precedence to those sources that have been the most successful in presenting facts in an equally balanced manner. It says ""describe the opposing viewpoints"". And where does this article do that ??? Rather than describe describe the opposing viewpoints, it suppresses opposing viewpoints. This is why the article is biased, censorsed and therefore must be deleted. I will be re-inserting the PROD tag in 24 hours if no one can come up with an argument that justifies having a biased viewpoint or can explain why and how the ""describe the opposing viewpoints"" requirement is insignificant enough to be ignored. - "	0	1	0	0	1
request please remove urdu wikipedia interwiki links from all european islam by country articles	1	0	0	0	0
It is not vandalism if it is the truth.	0	0	0	0	0
In addition, tags have been placed throughout tis section, indicating places where there might be a need for either improved or first sources. Note, finally, as I said at the Liddell article, in the LC section, these are important matters, controversial matters, about which I have no firm opinion; it is simply crucial that they be properly verifiable, and clearly stated. Best of fortune getting this in order. It has all the makings of a first-class article, if the matter of this controversy can be carefully, thoughtfully, and verifiably resolved. Cheers,	0	0	0	0	0
"""I understand the points you are making and I encourage you to continue to raise them in talk when you are next able to do so"" I am able to do so. However, the page is locked. Therefore the points remain silenced. We can continue chatting about procedural matters until you get your important points through my thick skull. Or you are free to unlock the content & perhaps risk massive vandalism & unthinkable horrible things. Your call chief. "	0	0	0	0	1
MPs The field included eight Members of Parliament.77.101.41.108	0	0	0	0	0
Please post your question.	0	0	0	0	0
You also really need to get a life, do you think spending all day on wikipedia trying to stop vandalism is worthwhile? If so you really are a Fruit Loop!	0	0	0	0	1
If you insist, we can keep going through the same routine forever. Personally, I'd rather compromise. 22:35, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!. Why not become a registered user? There are many benefits such as a watchlish. Have a look at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry. \| talk 11:52, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
Sorry!. I didn't realise that it was advertising. If it is against Wiki rules, please feel free to remove any images that I upload. Please just let myself know on ) 10:00, 11 November 2008 Thanks.	0	0	0	0	0
Per Steve, your signature is unacceptable. Please extend us the common courtesy of abiding by wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I have also removed your recent question from the refdesk, first because it was all but incomprehensible, and secondly since it seems to be doing that promoting your rather eccentric use of your user page as a journal of sorts. (talk)	0	0	0	0	0
Don't be a douche towards me.	0	0	0	0	1
Your GA nomination of Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan‎ The article Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan‎ you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan‎ for things needed to be addressed.	0	0	0	0	0
Arbitration We have reached a decision on Cantus's arbitration case. Please review Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Cantus#Final_Decision for details. 18:37, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
REDIRECT Talk:Kholm, Novgorod Oblast	0	0	0	0	0
You overtly undertake bold indignantly grotesque coldness over candid kindheartedness. CountyOfKent (talk) Furthermore, unless considerably knowledgeable, you ought undertake avoidance, stay silent. However objectionable, leave everything	0	0	0	0	1
" You're taking this whole thing too far. Thw link told me little. However, if you'd viewed the actual site you'd find "" * Live in New Mexico - Show Review, Kaffeine Buzz * Califronia Redemption: Band With a Mission - Article, The BS Report * Califronia Redemption Revisited - Article, The BS Report * Smother Magazine - Album Review, Smother Magazine * All Ages Zine - Album Review, All Ages Zine * Ear Candy Magazine - Album Review, Ear Candy Magazine * Impact Press - Album Review, Impact Press * Razorcake - Album Review, Razorcake * Maximum Rocknroll - Album Review, Maximum Rocknroll * Punkrockers.com - Album Review, Punkrockers.com What more do you want? Free albums? Or is it because you like Ronald Reagan?"	0	0	0	0	0
Apologies My apologies to those who feel that I have had a go at them in my haste to defend the LK posts. When I received the email (allegedly) from him, I genuinely thought it was him asking for support. I should have checked out the status before joining in, and it was only later that I realised that this wasn't the person that I actually know. It was clear after reading through the entire history that something was definitely not right. Geoff is quite rightly furious and is taking every step possible to find the protagonists. He has asked for his account to be suspended until further notice as he does not want this sort of thing to be repeated. I was very curious as he normally keeps his involvement in Templary quite private. There are however a few people out there who he has exposed for fraudulent activity and who will do nothing to get back at him. I am also very upset and can understand if editors do not want me to help out. Geoff's advice is to not get involved if these sort of problems can occur. But I am fairly good at reference checking, spelling and grammar if you require any help. I will also understand if you feel that my premature support without checking a real identity is disbarment to future assistance. Whichever way I wish you the best with the article on a subject that we are all like to study and promote. Geoff has emailed me to also pass on his wishes to all concerned and hopes you will understand his personal wish not to get involved. He is, though, another that wishes everyone the best of success in this article and is sorry that other people have been caught up in someone else's vicious attack on him. He has offered access to the archive if anyone wishes to check references on older documents that he holds.	0	0	0	0	0
Been observing these goings on too. Deal with it in a zero tolerance manner and do not give them any material to feed off of.	0	0	0	0	1
Stop to be stubborn then and tell the people who are working hard on writing an article, and tell them what do you think on this article sounds or look like promotional, that would be way smarter don't you think?	0	0	0	0	0
I've explained, unless you can verify these, as in CITATIONS OR REFERENCES they are no good. I'm detaching myself from this arguement. Have a fun.	0	0	0	0	0
" Your account has been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for the following reason; persistent vandalism. Please see our blocking policy for more information. — (talk) 19:09, 09 January 2008"	0	0	0	0	0
Replied [==Tags== Hi, replied here here]	0	0	0	0	0
I hope the lead has now settled to a stable state. Please take a look at it now. I dont think your prose has been altered by myself or sarvagnya, but feel free to change it if required.	0	0	0	0	0
" Hey, the only persons ""suffering"" were those who read that bullshit, Wikipedia opening itself up to a Copyright infringement suit, and the credibility of those who are facilitating both. The length of the protections will not influence my decision to revert the article back to a previous version that does not contain plagiarism. 22:02, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)"	0	0	0	0	1
REDIRECT Talk:Death of Dianne Brimble	0	0	0	0	0
Did you try any calm discussion? No, you left me no less than 8 templates accusing me of vandalism. Why are you only apologising for the first one? You need to explain why you even left that when anyone with half a brain could see that my edit was not vandalism. Did you even look at what you were reverting? You reverted twice within the same minute as the edits I made, and when I asked you why () you reverted that within the same minute as well. When I tried to ask the previous editor who stupidly reverted my edit why he did that, you reverted my edit to his page twice, both times less than a minute after I left it. How exactly was I supposed to communicate with you? Now, User:Qwyrxian, sure I know that civility is a policy. And I'm always civil if I don't have to deal with idiots who accuse me of vandalism when they just lack the intellect to see what I was doing. I mean, a 5 year old could tell that none of my edits were vandalism. It seems obvious to me that reverting constructive edits with offensive accusations of vandalism is much, much more damaging to a project which is supposed to be about creating an encyclopaedia than one person calling another person a fucking idiot. So I followed the WP:IAR policy. 190.163.3.204	0	0	0	0	2
But then he wouldn't be able to sit here arguing with everyone about trivialities on wikipedain't. If only I had a nickel for every user on wikipedain't that acted like a retard posting useless garbage more than half of the entire world disagrees with then I would be a very rich person today. I wish this place would shut down and go bankrupt or something. 69.207.4.244	0	0	0	2	2
Contesting my ban I refuse to be banned by a man that likes other men 82.110.125.85 I will be appealing to the court of justice 82.110.125.85	0	2	0	0	0
" ""Colored tables because they're pretty"" Could someone look into the work done by 7mike5000, such as the colorful, icon-filled table at Eating disorders#Personality_traits? Do tables like these represent a permissible variation on normal style, or an undesirable cluttering of the page with unnecessary formatting (or something in between)? WhatamIdoing (talk) ""inquired about the decorative approach at MOS, and the responses can be read here"". WhatamIdoing (talk) As per WP:Civil, I am asking you in a polite a fashion as possible, to please refrain from making comments such as as the above as it pertains to myself or any contributions I may have made or may make. I believe most people would find that comment to be somewhat disparaging. And your comment leads to comments like: ""And 7mike5000 would do well not to refer to his colleagues as ""anally retentive"" in his edit summaries"". Tony (talk) ""anal retentive"" Freud coined the term not me. A comment like that can easily be construed as implying ""or else"". ""Yes, the ""Skittlepedia"" effect is distracting and unprofessional"". Dabomb87 (talk) That speaks for itself. Wikipedia is for everyone, it was not created for a select few to feel like they can call the shots for the other couple of hundred million English speakers, it is not a cabal. Your initial comments set the stage, others follow. Constructive criticism I do not mind, to purposely make comments such as the aforementioned I do. I wrote Hemoglobin Lepore syndrome to prove a point to someone in a civil fashion. I believe I made a point with the use of exemplia gratia and and id est. I do not make comments to anyone. I keep to myself. I only respond. So to reiterate please refrain from the sarcasm, and going out of your way to dissect everything I do. Thank you. And have an pleasant day. "	0	0	0	0	1
Earwigbot category pouluator Hi, is it possible instead of populating a category like Category:AfC submissions by reviewer subpages, it fills in a list on a user subpage? This is because of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 August 18#Category:AfC submissions by reviewer (and all subcategories).	0	0	0	0	0
" Final Jury count What is the source that says that Sondra voted for Ozzy in the final? I heard her on ""Survivor Live"" today and it seemed like she voted for Yul. I can't be sure because I started watching in the middle... but it seems like the table in this article might be wrong. Could someone be confusing Sondra with Rebecca? Yul said in an interview he thought Sondra voted for him and Rebecca for Ozzy. - 12/18/2006"	0	0	0	0	0
"A barangay (Filipino: baranggay) is the smallest local government unit in the Philippines and is the Filipino term for a village, district, ward or town. Municipalities and cities are composed of barangays. Each barangay is headed by a barangay captain (punong barangay) i.e. the district mayor, who leads the barangay council (sangguniang barangay) composed of barangay councilors (kagawad). Every barangay also has a Youth Council (""Sangguniang Kabataan"" or ""SK"") composed of the SK President or Chairman and SK Councilors, who direct the youth-oriented activities, such as basketball leagues and other youth oriented activities, in the barangay. Historically, a barangay is a relatively small community of around 50 to 100 families. Most villages have only thirty to one hundred houses and the population varies from one hundred to five hundred persons. According to Legazpi, he found communities with twenty to thirty people only. Many coastal villages in the Visayan region consisted of no more than eight to ten houses. The word itself is derived from an ancient Malay boat called a balangay. This connection between community and boat supports certain theories on the history of the pre-colonial Philippines, specifically, that each original coastal “barangay” formed as a result of settlers arriving by boat from other places in Southeast Asia. Most communities were coastal or riverine in nature. T"	0	0	0	0	0
Olvera Street image Thanks for letting me know about the possible deletion of Image:Olvera_st_los_angeles.jpg. Unfortunately I am not prepared to relicense the image for unrestricted commercial use, so it looks like it will end up being deleted. 08:55, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0

VHEMT (Shanoman) I responded to you question on my talk page.

0

" Dates on Jinnah's article Could you explain why you consider the month/day format for the dates to be ""established"" when the day/month format is used throughout all other South Asian articles and nearly all articles not from the Americas? "

0

" Regarding your POV edits to Ibn Khaldun's article He says himself in his autobiography that he's in fact an Arab, you said ""stop deleting cited information""? Please follow your own advice. "

1

0

suport it belongs along with the more poorly documented and biased exersise reports, clearly this shoud remain with the comparative section.

0

. The dispute over the statement in the intro remains. Unless I see it qualified in some way, the tag will stay

0

" You are making a value judgement about the term; that is editorialising. The ""Final Solution"" clearly is a euphemism for extermination. ( @) "

1

0

1

Ok.... Bitch i swear to God i will fuckin beat your face now itz n and poppin i swear i noe blodds crips and all dem niggaz start wit me again ya dumbass bitch i swear i will beat ur mutha fuckin brain in iight bitch get ba to ur hooked on phonics

3

0

3

People magazine, umm yeah, no, that does not meet WP:MEDRS.

0

last time go suck a cock

0

2

0

1

Whatt a jew Make real articles, not stupid speedy dleteion you jew.

3

0

3

0

2

" 'This is SPARTA! . You will be encouraged to edit the next time you add truth a page, as you did with to Chuck Norris. — norris "

0

, and my faculty advisor, a Stanford graduate like my father, who also designed the first cost-effective semiconductor memory.

0

One Night in Japan You can edit in this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Night_In_Japan

0

Please read User_talk:Mcaplan243#March_2008_2 and take it seriously.

0

The issue will be solved, it's just a matter of time.

0

" Uninitiated variables can also be avoided by a simple assignment statement, like X=3. Would you call that a ""default"" ? "

0

occupation of supporters can i ask what the ocupation of the supporters has to to with the article and in particular the specific occupations stated. i feel that by listing lawyers and academics but not taxi drivers and primary school teachers it sounds like the movement is the preserve of intelectuals. which i feel is false.

0

REDIRECT Talk:Hannah Hodson (actress)

0

"No one has ""forced"" you to be the small person you are who finds it necessary to stick your nose where it doesn't belong and into affairs about which you have no knowledge. Not sure how you live with yourself. "

0

1

Editor issue I noticed you have had a bit of a problem on the Seymour Hersh page with some recent edits. Myself and another editor have had issues with the same person on other pages and have recently submitted a sockpuppet investigation request. I thought I might point it out to you, as I noticed the edits on Hersh were involved. The sockpuppet page is at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dooyar, if you have any comments or input. Thanks.

0

" Question Arky...quick question. When I look at your talk page, you have a large smiley face floating on the left side of my screen, covering up the WP nav buttons. Is this a function of the fact that I'm on a wide screened laptop or is it where you want it to be? T/C "

0

2006 (UTC) At this point, the entire article is unsourced. 14:30, 3 November

0

Merge 2015 Can we just redirect it to Vampire already? It's never been a separate topic. It should get one sentence in the real article about how the werewolf stories sometimes get mixed. This is a lot of verbiage for nothing.

0

" ""IF"" is right. There's really nothing more left to put on a script that hasn't already been said or done, other than another apocalyptic movie, that somehow involved dinosaurs; leading to his statement on making a 'spin off' - Steven needs to wise up and stop waiting. (mailbox) "

0

" Move mistakes Hi there. You mistakenly moved all the ""1. deild 19XX"" season articles to ""Faroe Islands Premier League Football 19XX"", even though the league was indeed called 1. deild until 2004. If you're going to make mass moves in future, please ensure that you're certain that you are moving them to the right titles - it's going to take me around 20 minutes to move them all back (for a second time). Cheers, 57 "

0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxing_News http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/rankings/ If Mac Dreamstate seriously belives his six sources (which contradict his own format anyway) are more credible than Boxing News then he obviously must know nothing about boxing and shouldn't even be commenting on the issue. Clown.

0

1

Then, what is their company [incorporation and registration] number with Companies House, as an incorporated private limited company limited by guarantee rather than by shares and with no share capital (£1 (GBP 1)-guarantee per member)? If they are not actually registered with Companies House, as far as I am concerned, they don't actually exist, at least not in England and Wales!

0

" How are we going to have more people join if we don't let anyone know. there are very few people looking at it. Probably just me and you? (leave me a message!) "

0

Please do not edit other people's user pages Please do not edit other people's user pages. Feel free to report it to other admins (except the one who is involved in it) if you would like.

0

"::Thanks, Hnsampat. Drmargi can lick it. Times of London not a reliable source? Lick it. Stuff it and lick it. By the way, it was stolen from the Jungle Brothers: ""Africa 'cause AfriCAN!!!"" "

2

0

2

I am not vandalizing anything. I am being serious this time, I apologize for everything I did. If i offended you in anyway, I am sorry. I do not want to get blocked. I have only been on here for like two or three days and people are already starting to hate me and one person says I'm harrassing him. I'm not harrassing anyone. Please don't block me. By the way, I promise I will not make ANY more edits to Wikipedia. -Mariolyrics4evr

0

If you want to comment above, go ahead. Whoh. There is something wrong with the sources in use. The AP article would be fine if talking about Prop 37, but using it as a source of scientific consensus is utterly absurd.

0

Your Abuse Response Filing Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from 92.5.198.12 .

0

"==Regarding edits made during March 4 2007== Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. '''''' (o rly?) "

0

" Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Winchester, Massachusetts, you will be blocked from editing. Will (aka ) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice"

0

" I'm not proposing a total rewrite, just to condense the main points so you don't have to remove that one paragraph in its entirety. I'm proposing Ling.Nut-Lite. I just don't think removing that whole paragraph is the best solution. I want to condense it to just the main points, leaving certain details for further discussion in the body. Here's what I propose so far: The Six Day War or June War..., also known as the 1967 Arab-Israeli war or the Third Arab-Israeli War, was fought between 5 June and 10 June, 1967 by Israel and the neighboring states of Egypt [then the United Arab Republic, UAR], Jordan, and Syria. At the war's end, Israel had seized the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt, the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria. After the 1956 Suez Crisis, Egypt agreed to the stationing of a United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF) in the Sinai to ensure compliance with the armistice agreement and prevent raids across the border . On 4 November 1966, Syria signed a mutual defense agreement with Egypt. Nine days later, Israel attacked the city of as-Samu in the Jordanian occupied West Bank in response to raids from the fedayeen group Fatah. King Hussein of Jordan criticized President Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt for failing to come to Jordan's aid and ""hiding behind UNEF skirts"" [I checked Oren p. 135 and there's no mention of this on that page; please help double check source and find reference - possible later printing is different, I have 2003 first edition]. On 14 May 1967, Nasser began sending Egyptian forces into the Sinai Peninsula. Two days later he requested and obtained the withdrawal of UNEF from Egyptian territory. Israel rejected a proposal to restation UNEF on its side of the border. Egyptian forces replaced UNEF positions at Sharm el-Sheikh in the southern Sinai overlooking the Straits of Tiran. Between 18 and 20 May Israel reiterated declarations made in 1957 that any closure of the Straits would be considered as a cassus belli, or justification for war. Nasser declared the Straits closed to Israeli shipping on 22-23 May. On 1 June, Israel formed a National Unity Government by widening its cabinet, and on 4 June the decision was made to go to war. The next morning, Israel launched Operation Focus, a large-scale surprise air strike that was the opening of the Six Day War. I think following this, since the lede really only mentions the war between Israel and Egypt, there should be a brief discussion of the Jordan and Syria fronts, as well. With this slimmer version, it should be possible to fit that in, at least briefly. Let me know what you think. "

0

No one is allowed to delete anything from my talk page!

0

"Thank you for experimenting with the page User:VanessaLuver4Ever on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. "

0

hello sineed i am the person trying to update the sweet relief page. i am the communications director for the charity and I am using copy from various press and info pieces i have written. the only copy/paste i used was the supporter list. you folks are amazing at this wiki stuff. i am trying. i would really like to see some of the info i entered back on. your last edit looked good. what do you think? tylerjamesmax

0

" It's fine except ""gathered an army of 10,000 soldiers"" suggests a traditional aermy, mercenaries etc., but his army was an army of converts, which is a central point. I suspect that the intent of ""followers"" was really to imply this. I'd suggest ""...gathered an army of 10,000 followers..."" or even ""gathered a Muslim army of 10,000 soldiers..."" "

0

" First of all, congratulations on the Good Article status. Nice work. Since you don't object, I have added that section back to Little Boy. That action should not affect its good article status. Here is my reasoning. That particular bomb design is uniquely associated with the Hiroshima bombing, which, in turn, was largely a public weapon effects demonstration. Its purpose was to show that a single bomb could duplicate the effects of, say, the Tokyo firebombing which required 279 airplanes and 1,700 tons of bombs. Hiroshima was spared any earlier bombing in order to serve as a pristine nuclear bomb target, a situation made possible by its lack of importance as a military target. The two airplanes that accompanied Enola Gay were there to measure the weapon effects. Nobody expected the loss of Hiroshima to tip the balance in favor of immediate surrender. The ""shock and awe"" was expected to come from observing that it was effect of a single bomb. Most of what we know about nuclear weapon effects comes from an intensive study of Hiroshima. It was flat urban terrain well protected by natural and artificial firebreaks, and it was enough larger than the total destruction area that the margins of the effects could be precisely measured. Nothing new was learned from Nagasaki, and no other bombs were tested on live urban targets. In the many test explosions that followed, large and small, the overpressure and thermal impulse contours were measured, and the Hiroshima effects were extrapolated to estimate the theoretical destruction area. Granted, it was pure happenstance that Little Boy, and not Fat Man, was used at Hiroshima, but since it was this discussion of weapon effects seems appropriate here. "

0

1

For once I agree with Adam. I'll go ahead and write the article.

0

Hi hi! Not sure if I'm doing this correctly, but I needed to comment on someone's page for class and you were right below me!

0

" Speedy deletion of Brainchild Studios A tag has been placed on Brainchild Studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. (talk • contribs) "

0

Wow! I just had a look at the work you've done on the Guantanamo Bay prisoners, and all I have to say is .... Wow! I am so very impressed with what you have done and how you've kept your cool. This is the sort of thing that gives me hope for Wikipedia. Again, good luck to you and maybe someday I'll be able to help.

0

" February 2011 Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ruby Bridges. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 1994 "

0

Since I posted here, the comment has to stay. Since what began the post is spam, it has been struck off.

0

" And read WP:RS, WP:V. Also, about his Slovak origin: Wikipedia:Fringe theories. 100000000000000000000000000000 english references which say he was Hungarian, one (english?) that he was Slovak...9 "

1

0

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! I would encourage you to read WP:NPOV to make sure you understand Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Some of your edits to Criticism of Mormonism were marginally POV - not enough for me to revert, but leaning towards a biased position. It is important to separate our beliefs from the verifiable facts of an issue. Again, I don't believe you crossed the line, but you seemed pretty close to it. Once again, thank you for helping make Wikipedia a better place, and I hope to see you contribute more in the future. (Talk)

0

1

0

In response to GM, in the 5th c. Persia's king attacked Armenia to strengthen his control. Yet Armenia was not independent of Persia, and if I stated otherwise, I would be branded a nationalist. Local authorities tend to *act* independently as central authority weakens, yet this alone doesn't establish an independent state. If Persia recognized khan as independent, or if the khan defeated Persia's attacking force, it might constitute establishment of independent statehood.

0

" I started Jump (Rihanna song). Feel free to start editing, just open the talk and there's the treasure ;) !— (T2ME) "

0

Happy birthday to Andrew Frank Hatch age 117 if you go by Social Security or 111 if you go by the 1940 census . Either one still a major achievement for a man.

0

" Then expect a WP:BOOMERANG unless you or someone else proves your WP:ASPERSIONS. "

0

1

need a disambiguation page

0

" Cleaning up citations I decided to trim two of the three cite tags and removed them. I doubt they would be missed. As for the third cite tag, I really think ""In addition, the exchange rate between ruble and USD is not adequately giving a real comparison to what the costs for Russia really are."" isn't needed, and is in violation of WP:OR. I hesitate on this last one only because it was Citation Needed this year instead of years ago. Cold7Realm, I know you suggested I wait, but I didn't trim out too much and thought this might be acceptable. Please revert if you disagree. "

0

So why is it you alone who is right and the other ten people who don't agree with you are wrong? Who do you think you are? I am glad you are starting to show the editors what a nutcase you are with the toothbrush comment

0

1

Are people discriminated because they are members of cults? I admit that this may happen in a few cases some countries, but I think this is an exception.

0

1

0

I voted delete on this issue but it has only recently been brought to my attention, by accident, that the article was not deleted, even though there was a majority to do so. I find it puzzling such a decision has been reached. There are a number of anomalies in the VfD process which needs reviewing. I will bring them up on the VfD discussion page.

0

I am a woman but I look like a man, therefore I am a transsexual woman. After SRT I will still be a woman and look like a woman, therefore I will just be a (former transsexual) woman.

0

1

0

March 2015 (UTC) 22:12, 10

0

July 2006 (UTC) Thanks for fixing it. 05:29, 8

0

Bullshit= There was no violation, you removed factual material. Ditto again the above statement. I have also informed Wikipedia's administrators of your persistent attempts to insert subjective material into this article, in violation of WP:NPOV. Ditto to that There was no violation, you removed factual material. Greetings. Uncyclopedia is not associated with Wikimedia, and continuing to insert this false information is considered vandalism. Also, please heed Codeine's warnings about NPOV; opinions do not belong in Wikipedia articles. Thanks, (spill yours?) Bullshit There is a connection between Wikia and Wikimedia, Wikia pwns Uncyc. Sorry, loyalist. Your edit to Uncyclopedia Your recent edit to Uncyclopedia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. ''' for frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // =

0

1

user:Bbb23 Well my submission are being kept deleted and I am extremely discouraged to make any further. Last time I followed appropriate steps and submission speedily deleted. Draft-Get help from chat-Once chat says ready submit draft- and the rest is article accepted by editors. And my ignorance is I am asking at the chat that article is why heavily modified. If I did not mention in chat, It will not be tagged deletation and will not get deleted because It was approved and edited by

0

Jesse Ragan deletion nomination Hi, I have received notice that the page I began about Jesse Ragan has been nominated for deletion based upon suspicion it is a vanity article. First, I am not the man (assuming Jesse ragan is male), nor have I met him/her. I began the article because as a professor of typography I felt Ragan's work significant, and that s/he had achieved work of lasting merit fairly early in life. S/he has been several time recognized by the American Institute of Graphic Arts (AIGA) (the national professional organization for graphic designers), Ragan's work has appeared in respected design periodicals, and has lectured on typography at several Association of Independent Colleges of Art and Design (AICAD) institutions. Several days ago I noticed removal of Ragan's name from credits for typefaces on the Tobias Frere-Jones article. My first thought was that some disagrement might have occured between Ragan and his former employers Hoefler & Frere-Jones, perhaps leading to a nomination for deletion. Mr. Hoefler wrote to me publicly on my talk page that Jesse Ragan was only one of many who worked on the project. That may be the case, but that would not discredit typefaces Ragan has produced entirely on his own, or the two mentions of his contributions to the Archer typeface on the AIGA web site. Clearly, at some point someone at Hoefler & Frere-Jones thought Ragan's contributions significant enough to provide his/her name (and not the rest of that team) to our national professional organization. The fact that Mr./Ms. Ragan is now independent and a competitor to other type foundries might be a part of this. But I have no knowledge of this. I know none of these people personally, and I respect the work of all of them as a review of my edit history will suggest. My primary reason for beginning the article was to increase the number of articles on typeface designers, and a secondary desire to increase the number of typography related articles in general. Jesse Ragan's work is very solid, even his/her own direct client list is impressive. In the world of typography, apprentices are historically given credit, witness Francesco Griffo who apprenticed to Aldus Manutius. It is my hope that Wikipedia will continue to make some room for subjects that though not block buster in scale are significant.

0

" Re: Coordinator Elections! Well, while I've been a bit tardy these recent times, yes, I will probably stand again now that the pressures of life are easing off! I'm also going to put in some graft and finish the last chunks of my pet project, Military history of New Zealand. Good luck to you! e "

0

" Exactly why this article should be deleted Since some editors have deplorable difficulty understanding (as ITAQALLAH laments ""but on the talk page never explains in detail how the content is in accordance with policy, and ignores any policies that I may cite"") why this article deserves to be deleted, I will once more explain now being very precise and exact so that you may be cleared of all doubts. The article (in its post-censorsed state) is in violation of WP:BLP. Let me quote from it: Editors must take particular care adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States and to all of our content policies, especially: Neutral point of view (NPOV) Verifiability No original research This article violates requirement number One: Neutral point of view (NPOV) Now for idiotic editors (like those who childishly colour their usernames) who will have difficulty comprehending how on earth this article violates NPOV (owing to their idiocy, which I hope Eugenics will fix one day) let me quote section 2.5 from the NPOV page: Balance When reputable sources contradict one another, the core of the NPOV policy is to let competing approaches exist on the same page: work for balance, that is: describe the opposing viewpoints according to reputability of the sources, and give precedence to those sources that have been the most successful in presenting facts in an equally balanced manner. It says ""describe the opposing viewpoints"". And where does this article do that ??? Rather than describe describe the opposing viewpoints, it suppresses opposing viewpoints. This is why the article is biased, censorsed and therefore must be deleted. I will be re-inserting the PROD tag in 24 hours if no one can come up with an argument that justifies having a biased viewpoint or can explain why and how the ""describe the opposing viewpoints"" requirement is insignificant enough to be ignored. - "

0

1

0

1

request please remove urdu wikipedia interwiki links from all european islam by country articles

1

0

It is not vandalism if it is the truth.

0

In addition, tags have been placed throughout tis section, indicating places where there might be a need for either improved or first sources. Note, finally, as I said at the Liddell article, in the LC section, these are important matters, controversial matters, about which I have no firm opinion; it is simply crucial that they be properly verifiable, and clearly stated. Best of fortune getting this in order. It has all the makings of a first-class article, if the matter of this controversy can be carefully, thoughtfully, and verifiably resolved. Cheers,

0

"""I understand the points you are making and I encourage you to continue to raise them in talk when you are next able to do so"" I am able to do so. However, the page is locked. Therefore the points remain silenced. We can continue chatting about procedural matters until you get your important points through my thick skull. Or you are free to unlock the content & perhaps risk massive vandalism & unthinkable horrible things. Your call chief. "

0

1

MPs The field included eight Members of Parliament.77.101.41.108

0

Please post your question.

0

You also really need to get a life, do you think spending all day on wikipedia trying to stop vandalism is worthwhile? If so you really are a Fruit Loop!

0

1

If you insist, we can keep going through the same routine forever. Personally, I'd rather compromise. 22:35, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

0

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!. Why not become a registered user? There are many benefits such as a watchlish. Have a look at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry. | talk 11:52, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

0

Sorry!. I didn't realise that it was advertising. If it is against Wiki rules, please feel free to remove any images that I upload. Please just let myself know on ) 10:00, 11 November 2008 Thanks.

0

Per Steve, your signature is unacceptable. Please extend us the common courtesy of abiding by wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I have also removed your recent question from the refdesk, first because it was all but incomprehensible, and secondly since it seems to be doing that promoting your rather eccentric use of your user page as a journal of sorts. (talk)

0

Don't be a douche towards me.

0

1

Your GA nomination of Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan‎ The article Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan‎ you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan‎ for things needed to be addressed.

0

Arbitration We have reached a decision on Cantus's arbitration case. Please review Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Cantus#Final_Decision for details. 18:37, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)

0

REDIRECT Talk:Kholm, Novgorod Oblast

0

You overtly undertake bold indignantly grotesque coldness over candid kindheartedness. CountyOfKent (talk) Furthermore, unless considerably knowledgeable, you ought undertake avoidance, stay silent. However objectionable, leave everything

0

1

" You're taking this whole thing too far. Thw link told me little. However, if you'd viewed the actual site you'd find "" * Live in New Mexico - Show Review, Kaffeine Buzz * Califronia Redemption: Band With a Mission - Article, The BS Report * Califronia Redemption Revisited - Article, The BS Report * Smother Magazine - Album Review, Smother Magazine * All Ages Zine - Album Review, All Ages Zine * Ear Candy Magazine - Album Review, Ear Candy Magazine * Impact Press - Album Review, Impact Press * Razorcake - Album Review, Razorcake * Maximum Rocknroll - Album Review, Maximum Rocknroll * Punkrockers.com - Album Review, Punkrockers.com What more do you want? Free albums? Or is it because you like Ronald Reagan?"

0

Apologies My apologies to those who feel that I have had a go at them in my haste to defend the LK posts. When I received the email (allegedly) from him, I genuinely thought it was him asking for support. I should have checked out the status before joining in, and it was only later that I realised that this wasn't the person that I actually know. It was clear after reading through the entire history that something was definitely not right. Geoff is quite rightly furious and is taking every step possible to find the protagonists. He has asked for his account to be suspended until further notice as he does not want this sort of thing to be repeated. I was very curious as he normally keeps his involvement in Templary quite private. There are however a few people out there who he has exposed for fraudulent activity and who will do nothing to get back at him. I am also very upset and can understand if editors do not want me to help out. Geoff's advice is to not get involved if these sort of problems can occur. But I am fairly good at reference checking, spelling and grammar if you require any help. I will also understand if you feel that my premature support without checking a real identity is disbarment to future assistance. Whichever way I wish you the best with the article on a subject that we are all like to study and promote. Geoff has emailed me to also pass on his wishes to all concerned and hopes you will understand his personal wish not to get involved. He is, though, another that wishes everyone the best of success in this article and is sorry that other people have been caught up in someone else's vicious attack on him. He has offered access to the archive if anyone wishes to check references on older documents that he holds.

0

Been observing these goings on too. Deal with it in a zero tolerance manner and do not give them any material to feed off of.

0

1

Stop to be stubborn then and tell the people who are working hard on writing an article, and tell them what do you think on this article sounds or look like promotional, that would be way smarter don't you think?

0

I've explained, unless you can verify these, as in CITATIONS OR REFERENCES they are no good. I'm detaching myself from this arguement. Have a fun.

0

" Your account has been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for the following reason; persistent vandalism. Please see our blocking policy for more information. — (talk) 19:09, 09 January 2008"

0

Replied [==Tags== Hi, replied here here]

0

I hope the lead has now settled to a stable state. Please take a look at it now. I dont think your prose has been altered by myself or sarvagnya, but feel free to change it if required.

0

" Hey, the only persons ""suffering"" were those who read that bullshit, Wikipedia opening itself up to a Copyright infringement suit, and the credibility of those who are facilitating both. The length of the protections will not influence my decision to revert the article back to a previous version that does not contain plagiarism. 22:02, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)"

0

1

REDIRECT Talk:Death of Dianne Brimble

0

Did you try any calm discussion? No, you left me no less than 8 templates accusing me of vandalism. Why are you only apologising for the first one? You need to explain why you even left that when anyone with half a brain could see that my edit was not vandalism. Did you even look at what you were reverting? You reverted twice within the same minute as the edits I made, and when I asked you why () you reverted that within the same minute as well. When I tried to ask the previous editor who stupidly reverted my edit why he did that, you reverted my edit to his page twice, both times less than a minute after I left it. How exactly was I supposed to communicate with you? Now, User:Qwyrxian, sure I know that civility is a policy. And I'm always civil if I don't have to deal with idiots who accuse me of vandalism when they just lack the intellect to see what I was doing. I mean, a 5 year old could tell that none of my edits were vandalism. It seems obvious to me that reverting constructive edits with offensive accusations of vandalism is much, much more damaging to a project which is supposed to be about creating an encyclopaedia than one person calling another person a fucking idiot. So I followed the WP:IAR policy. 190.163.3.204

0

2

But then he wouldn't be able to sit here arguing with everyone about trivialities on wikipedain't. If only I had a nickel for every user on wikipedain't that acted like a retard posting useless garbage more than half of the entire world disagrees with then I would be a very rich person today. I wish this place would shut down and go bankrupt or something. 69.207.4.244

0

2

Contesting my ban I refuse to be banned by a man that likes other men 82.110.125.85 I will be appealing to the court of justice 82.110.125.85

0

2

0

" ""Colored tables because they're pretty"" Could someone look into the work done by 7mike5000, such as the colorful, icon-filled table at Eating disorders#Personality_traits? Do tables like these represent a permissible variation on normal style, or an undesirable cluttering of the page with unnecessary formatting (or something in between)? WhatamIdoing (talk) ""inquired about the decorative approach at MOS, and the responses can be read here"". WhatamIdoing (talk) As per WP:Civil, I am asking you in a polite a fashion as possible, to please refrain from making comments such as as the above as it pertains to myself or any contributions I may have made or may make. I believe most people would find that comment to be somewhat disparaging. And your comment leads to comments like: ""And 7mike5000 would do well not to refer to his colleagues as ""anally retentive"" in his edit summaries"". Tony (talk) ""anal retentive"" Freud coined the term not me. A comment like that can easily be construed as implying ""or else"". ""Yes, the ""Skittlepedia"" effect is distracting and unprofessional"". Dabomb87 (talk) That speaks for itself. Wikipedia is for everyone, it was not created for a select few to feel like they can call the shots for the other couple of hundred million English speakers, it is not a cabal. Your initial comments set the stage, others follow. Constructive criticism I do not mind, to purposely make comments such as the aforementioned I do. I wrote Hemoglobin Lepore syndrome to prove a point to someone in a civil fashion. I believe I made a point with the use of exemplia gratia and and id est. I do not make comments to anyone. I keep to myself. I only respond. So to reiterate please refrain from the sarcasm, and going out of your way to dissect everything I do. Thank you. And have an pleasant day. "

0

1

Earwigbot category pouluator Hi, is it possible instead of populating a category like Category:AfC submissions by reviewer subpages, it fills in a list on a user subpage? This is because of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 August 18#Category:AfC submissions by reviewer (and all subcategories).

0

" Final Jury count What is the source that says that Sondra voted for Ozzy in the final? I heard her on ""Survivor Live"" today and it seemed like she voted for Yul. I can't be sure because I started watching in the middle... but it seems like the table in this article might be wrong. Could someone be confusing Sondra with Rebecca? Yul said in an interview he thought Sondra voted for him and Rebecca for Ozzy. - 12/18/2006"

0

"A barangay (Filipino: baranggay) is the smallest local government unit in the Philippines and is the Filipino term for a village, district, ward or town. Municipalities and cities are composed of barangays. Each barangay is headed by a barangay captain (punong barangay) i.e. the district mayor, who leads the barangay council (sangguniang barangay) composed of barangay councilors (kagawad). Every barangay also has a Youth Council (""Sangguniang Kabataan"" or ""SK"") composed of the SK President or Chairman and SK Councilors, who direct the youth-oriented activities, such as basketball leagues and other youth oriented activities, in the barangay. Historically, a barangay is a relatively small community of around 50 to 100 families. Most villages have only thirty to one hundred houses and the population varies from one hundred to five hundred persons. According to Legazpi, he found communities with twenty to thirty people only. Many coastal villages in the Visayan region consisted of no more than eight to ten houses. The word itself is derived from an ancient Malay boat called a balangay. This connection between community and boat supports certain theories on the history of the pre-colonial Philippines, specifically, that each original coastal “barangay” formed as a result of settlers arriving by boat from other places in Southeast Asia. Most communities were coastal or riverine in nature. T"

0

Olvera Street image Thanks for letting me know about the possible deletion of Image:Olvera_st_los_angeles.jpg. Unfortunately I am not prepared to relicense the image for unrestricted commercial use, so it looks like it will end up being deleted. 08:55, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

0