tcapelle/kaggle-toxic-annotated-filtered · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 6 5k	racial_origin int64 0 3	gender_sex int64 0 3	religion int64 0 3	ability int64 0 3	violence int64 0 3
Well, he (Wormy) is also a character in one episode of that show, so that's probably why. Perhaps it should be a disambiguation page instead? — \| Talk	0	0	0	0	0
SUCK MY COCK WIKIPEDIA EDITORS...FUCKING ASSHOLE DORKS. JUST TRYING TO MAKE THE SITE BETTER YOU UPTIGHT CUNTS	0	1	0	0	3
" Article needs review by nuclear physicist(s) Just skimming the introduction I found three rather significant factual errors which I corrected. I review those here. The first point was that the article insisted that fusion occurs between like-charged atomic nuclei, but this limitation is not true. For example, a nuclear reaction of 12C+16O can proceed through the fusion channel, yet their atomic charge differs. There are literally hundreds of such cases, and citation would be gregarious and seems unnecessary (but I can link a few articles if anyone disputes this point). The article suggested that two protons can fuse, and even suggested that such a reaction is governed by the nuclear strong force. Not true. p+p->d is a weak interaction, because you must convert a proton into a neutron. Weak interactions are not fusion. This error leads to a more general point. Simply putting nuclei together to make something heavier does not constitute fusion. A common misconception is that nuclear fusion refers to any coalescence of nuclei, but in nuclear physics, fusion is a specific reaction mechanism. I will need to confirm, but I believe that, for example, the reactions in the CNO cycles proceed mainly through radiative capture, which isn't fusion. I can find comments in the introduction instructing me not to correct the ""general"" statement about nucleosynthesis, but the point is that this is generalized so much that it is incorrect. I can even find comments there saying not to link to the s-process, but the s-process does not involve fusion reactions as far as I know. There are actually a rather limited number of stellar nucleosynthesis cases that actually proceed through the fusion mechanism, such as carbon burning and oxygen burning. These are literally the only two examples I can think of off hand that I'm sure proceed via fusion. All the rest I'm fairly dubious about at the moment, although some of the pp-chain reactions may also be fusion. Thus, we in fact need likely a whole section explaining the nuclear physics of fusion and what it is and what it is not. Finally, I noticed that the article suggested humans have never controlled fusion. This is naff. There are plenty of nuclear physics experiments which have not only controlled fusion, but made very careful measurements of the properties of the fusion mechanism at many energy scales. Clearly, the writer wanted to imply that fusion as a source of stable source of energy has never been achieved by humans, so this was changed to reflect that point. But given that I could find a serious physics error in every paragraph I read so far, clearly this article needs some serious attention Please do not revert my corrections without discussing the matter here or explicit citation indicating that I am incorrect. "	0	0	0	0	0
26, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Yes you can. The opinion is commonplace, and you have not answered any of the relevant points. 13	0	0	0	0	0
" Oh, forgot to respond here. It's been removed. Thanks for bringing this up. vecia "	0	0	0	0	0
Sorry, I didn't realize it was privileged correspondence. My bad.	0	0	0	0	0
OK, I'll leave it to your discretion. I've been creating articles on various past and present Olympians, and I've found red links to be useful in that regard, but I also see your point about many of them being destined to remain red links indefinitely.	0	0	0	0	0
REDIRECT Talk:Illinois Central Gulf commuter rail accident	0	0	0	0	0
I find your page racially insulting. It offends me when you state that you support the Indian Cricket team therefor i am reporting you to administrators and Harbhjan Singh	2	0	0	0	1
Book Hello, I saw by browsing through the contributions page for North Korea that you were the one who added Norbert Vollertsen's book to the list of further reading. I have been unable to locate this book anywhere. Do you have a copy or can you tell me where I could get a copy? Thank you! wookiekiller626 @ yahoo . com	0	0	0	0	0
" DrChrissy lied again and again Dr Chrissy wrote 'it is against Wikipedia policy', however the link she provided Wikipedia:No naming editors is a proposal, not a policy. DrChrissy lied again. For her many past lies see pages such as the talk page history of animal welfare and Marian Dawkins. 124.170.218.196 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.63.54 Johnuniq's removal of my text Hi CYl7EPTEMA777, Johnuniq has removed my text twice now. It made difficult for me to talk to you. He is wrong on the editing summary, I am happy and calm. I notice you mentioned Johnuniq is a sockpuppet on the talk page, thanks for the information, I should have thought of that: he conducted person attack to me on many occasions. This show what kind of person he is. The text Johnuniq tried to remove are factual statement of misconducts, it is backed up by evidence. as documented here, DrChrissy and Johnuniq has been harassing the valid contribution of CYl7EPTEMA777 and other editors. 124.168.30.60 "	0	0	0	0	1
Idiot Your revert of my edits to 'Whistleblower' shows that you did not look at them at all. I in fact removed nonsense that was to be removed anyway by another user several days later. Do not presume that I am a vandal! Jun 9, 2006	0	0	0	0	1
" Youc an report me if you want, but that ""report"" will be removed as well, as it in invalid, for I have only been reverting vandalism. If you don't want to swallow your pride and admit you are wrong, well, that's your problem, not mine. "	0	0	0	0	1
Don't delete this message like the previous one. I want this post to be something of a message for you to see what kind of STALKER you are	0	0	0	0	1
Wikipedia style Thanks for the pointer. That was a missing element in my Wikipedia education.	0	0	0	0	0
" Favor Ejgreen77, can you please do me a favor? Can you tag Brian Wickstrom with ""{{userreq}}""? You had created him as a redirect to go to Louisiana–Monroe Warhawks. The problem is, Wickstrom is on Template:Louisiana–Monroe Warhawks athletic director navbox and anyone clicking it will think they're being taken to his article. Head coaches, athletic directors, and team seasons of NCAA Division I football and men's basketball programs should never be redirects since they're notable. By you tagging the redirect that you created with ""{{userreq}}"", an admin can come in and delete it. Thanks. "	0	0	0	0	0
" original research this looks like original research to me, esp. the first paragraph. maybe some cited content will appear but after the ""cool"" ""african philosophy"" fiasco i'm not so hopeful. "	1	0	0	0	0
Pablo and victor :Pablo and victor A tag has been placed on Pablo and victor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Pablo and victor. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SUBWAYguy	0	0	0	0	0
Romanian language Romanian language is spoken about 26-30 millions people in the world. It is not spoken only in Romania I hope you do realize this?! If in the articles it is written that in one country is one language (e.g. Romanian for Romania and Moldovan language for Moldova) then it's a false and must be corrected. You have to understand this. There are 3 things that may cover the truth: 1. indifference 2. escapism 3. ... till next time if ever.	0	0	0	0	0
" AFR rouY you are quite welcome dude... enjoy the mop... theres a lot of cleaning to do. ™ "	0	0	0	0	0
I agree with Karanacs, a notables section isn't necessary. Just linking to the main article is fine. Before we start adding organizations like Singing Cadets, Aggie Wranglers, SCONA, we need to agree upon it; we can't add everything to do with A&M; on this template (particularly student life aspects). I think SCONA or Singing Cadets might be notable enough (I really don't know much about either), but I wouldn't recommend including Aggie Wranglers. Remember this template should include aspects of A&M; that users will most likely be looking for. -	0	0	0	0	0
AW I WANT TO BLOCK WERT WERT NAH YOU FUCKING TERDS	0	0	0	0	1
up (Talk) (Talk) (Talk) Blocked for blanking Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Walking Game (Talk)	0	0	0	0	0
Thanks WLU. I have tried to find the book - it's very truncated on google books, so I am trying to find it in a library. I will def. take a look and discuss. Certainly the points and views held by this book are representative of a number of medical professionals. Will return to the topic once I find it.	0	0	0	0	0
2009 (UTC) Fully endorsed!. Further, if you read his , you'll notice he has an almost full-scale Zoo in his living quarters, which leads me to believe that, besides being a complete nuisance, this creep is also a fag. What else is left for him? He seems to derive pleasure in annoying other editors by consistently destroying their edits. And still he asks to be treated with civility! What he deserves is a good kick in the arse, maybe many at that! 12:40, 17 October	0	3	0	0	3
image i have uploaded a better image, buti do not know how to put it on herpage. Can someone else do it, just press undo in the history page.	0	0	0	0	0
i hate you for deleting my stuff im going to hunt you down and slice you up and cook you for my baby ) have a nice day hun	0	0	0	0	3
" = On going battle with Steve Irwins parents not mentioned = curious why this battle of greed and etc was left out. is it against the rules to highlight the not pretty side of the truth? truth be told her public image kinda paints her as well nevermind.. just curious why the negitive is filtered out. I'm no wiki scholar so I really don't know just asking. I'm sure one of the people that can edit ""semi protected"" stuff wold know what's allowed what's not and what isn't added on purpose."	0	0	0	0	0
" Night: Here's your cite, which actually addresses several of your wishes: WP Biographies of Living Persons. You should look especially to: ""Using the subject as a self-published source"" - it states that ""the article is not based primarily on such sources."". Thirteen of your eighteen source references are to Pedro and Me, or Winick's personal sites (yes, IMDB counts). For example, you cite the book as the reason for keeping in the discussion of Rainey, while I repeat-it's an isolated, non-turning-point event in his life. It is appropriate for the Real World page, perhaps, but here it's a little off-topic. You might as well put in the name of a flavor of ice cream he doesn't like, or that someone was mean to him in middle school. It's just not important enough for what should be a short bio. And a link to Zamora's bio can cover his illness, a mention that he had HIV/AIDS and was ill covers him quite nicelythere's no need to go into it, except for the impact it had on Winick. I'm just trying to get the article back on track as a one-topic writing hereI'm not ""accusing"" you of anything. To answer your direct question, see the heading ""Presumption in Favor of Privacy"", under ""Privacy of Birthdays"" on the same page-it may be published elsewhere, but I don't know that he's quite notable enough to justify keeping the full date-where's the harm in only noting the year? It seems a fairly harmless, sensible change to me. Also, can someone who is more familiar with the subject add back a criticisms section? As there are two of us, at least, that came to WP solely to find out what the controversy surrounding him might be, can someone add this information? I'm still in the dark. ) "	0	0	0	0	0
Why is the q&A; regarding her book being deleted? Those are her exact words in response to the questions about the inaccuracies in her book. I can forward the email from her if need be.	0	0	0	0	0
MY PAGE 3234434aAa Your just a mean OLD BULLSHITTING fart...as you would put it.	0	0	0	0	1
" Can't sleep, clown will eat me The last time he was here was March 31 last year. I think it's unlikely you'll get a response. Shadow "	0	0	0	0	1
" I hope you have learned your lesson 1. Do not be a troll. 2. Do not accuse a user of ""vandalism"" when he is guilty of no such thing. Why are you a sysop if you lack the requisite skills, knowledge, and experience? I will leave that as a point for you to ponder. Stop attacking the work of an editor more experienced than yourself. At Seneca College, 142.204.42.82 "	0	0	0	0	1
I see evidence of a broad if not total consensus here. There's no point debating it forever. I have made the move. Hesperian	0	0	0	0	0
Pembroke sucks.com I am from the pembroke area and I found the link to pembroke sucks usefull and interesting. It is as far as I know the only forum dedicated to pembroke and the pembroke area. I say: as far as policy is concerned, coming on here everyday to remove a link that walks the line between usefull and not usefull is imho a little excesive. I understand that the people who run pembroke sucks also don't seem to know when enough is enough (I myself have removed large adds for their site from the pembroke article) and they should get the hint (like.. you don't own this site, and technically your link shouldn't be here. So why do you think it is somehow your right to post it?)but really.... its a link... its not even in the main body of the article. This is not a gateway to some larger problem. Let it go. stop being a link nazi. and stop posting your link where its not welcome. This is not one of the articles where links are used to support points of view (like on, i don't know, white power sites) so whats the big deal?	0	0	0	0	1
The British spelling is -paedia. The ligature is archaic and only survives in the Britannica's proper name. Now fix that mess you created back to the correct way as it stood for years.	0	0	0	0	0
No, I am not threatening and vandalizing, please don't accuse me of something that based on your own opinion and with no substantial proof. I need an apology here. I am saying that the italian coach's comments and the chinese coach's comments could also be included in the US gymnasts pages because they are just like the comments on Deng's size and tooth, opinions without proof. But the comments about Deng can be included and the comments about the US gymnansts cannot. They are all from reliable sources, they are verified, and the media are reporting fact that the chinese and italian coaches made comments about foreign and US gymnasts could be doping because they are muscular. Just tell me the difference between the comments between on Deng and the US gymnasts? They both based on opinions, not evidence but one can be included and the other cannot. I asked for evidence to support the comments made on Deng, but again you ignore it. You are really biased here. Do we have third party here to do the judgement? Or do I have tolerate your biased view and your accusation on me?	1	0	0	0	0
It wouldn't be disinformation to allow 10% of the article space - which at the moment reads like a eulogy - to a representative selection of scholarly reception for these theories.	0	0	0	0	0
" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — (Talk) "	0	0	0	0	0
, wow, good snag..	0	0	0	0	0
Thanks for the compliment.	0	0	0	0	0
JTF The initials in my name is JTF, and i was born the day after this force was made! 14. april 1993 =D	0	0	0	0	0
Isn't it against policy to block someone without warning? Especially if they didn't harass anyone in the first place? 84.16.230.15	0	0	0	0	0
I AM TRYING SO HARD NOT TO LOOSE MY TEMPER SARAH STOP DELETING THE CATEGORY OF WHOVIANS WHY DO YOU KEEP DELETING IT WHY WHY WHY	0	0	0	0	1
" I think that we should use the official player's name, and not the IRB ""transcription"". If IRB doesn't care about accents, we do. After all, it's making a (little) mistake. "	0	0	0	0	0
" EDIT: I just finished trying to cleaup the tone of the article. I tried to make stylistic improvements and fix grammatical errors as well as remove unnecesary or irrelevant information. The article still needs a lot of work, especially since the article is huge, but only has 8 citations. A few suggestons: —-Add citations! —-Remove the ""Fashionista"" section, or at least change it radically. This seems more like fanworship than anything. —-Organise and complete the ""Acting"" and ""Television"" sections (after ""Controversies"") —-Clean up the style and tone of the article some more —-Don't use ""Regine"" to refer to her, it's not encyclopedic. Hopefully I'll be able to work on the article some more; I'm also excited to see the additions/changes that others will make. The article has tons of potential. "	0	0	0	0	0
All of you can SUCK IT!	0	0	0	0	2
Once again, sources? Look up Devadasi on UN.org, the UN describes the dalit girls as VICTIMS, and the practice as a form of prostitution. If HRW and the UN are anti-Hindu, who's reliable?	2	1	2	0	0
See Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources.	0	0	0	0	0
Blocked for 3RR vio As per above, you are blocked from editing WP for 24 hours.	0	0	0	0	0
"::With due respect to the noble Drrll, one the finest Wikipedia editors with whom I have ever had the honor of collaborating, I would be content with . Informing the reader that Media Matters describes itself as ""politically progressive"" and that it is dedicated to fighting ""conservative misinformation"", for all intents and purposes, tells him or her that MMFA is LIBERAL. "	0	0	0	0	0
Hello Bluerasberry, yes I am in charge of Communications for the ACTG and wanted to update the page with a few more dates to make the history section more current. I am new to Wikipedia and any assistance posting would be appreciated. How can I post these changes without them being deleted? ACTGNetwork	0	0	0	0	0
done, actualyl quoted your old line, albeit in shorter form. ta ta	0	0	0	0	0
Dyslexic reply As usual, T-man uses a personal attack on me rather than defend his work. If there is an error in a fact, FIX IT. The issue is not errors, it is format. And T-Man's format and syle is horrendous. Nothing he just said is (a) intelligible, or (b) useful in explaining why his substantial rewrites are preferable. The intro should IDENTIFY key villains, not go into detail on each one. That is what the rest of the article is for, and beyond that, any given villians own wiki.	0	0	0	1	1
Firstly, he called me a hypocrite. And secondly, I said that Muhammad was not at all violent or vindictive or insane.	0	0	1	0	0
" An entry from appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 30 January, 2007."	0	0	0	0	0
Sockpuppet of Flyhead I'm just a new user, not a sockpuppet of Flyhead!!!	0	0	0	0	0
"Since it has now been established that this discussion refers to a subsequently titled and reinterpreted revision of the original 2001 (untitled) two-sentence petition calling for ""skeptical examination of evidence for scientific theories"" and since there is no reliable source to DI's controversial linking of the 103 signers of the original untitled petition to its subsequently titled, reinterpreted, and repurposed version, I propose archiving or deleting this section as it has now been revealed that there is no reliably sourced connection of the retitled and reinterpreted document to the subject of this biography article. "	0	0	0	0	0
Wet Willie is an extremely underrated band, and I have a sneaking suspicion it may becuase of their name. Nevertheless, they are extremely talented for who they were, and one would be surprised the clear sound and strong arrangements which may up this band.	0	0	0	0	0
February 2012 (UTC) Mazza, the source for this section, uses imitation of Christ 13:09, 10	0	0	0	0	0
. So your edit replaced a debatable statement we don't have a source for with one that is essentially just nonsense	0	0	0	0	1
" Talkback Thanks man.....:) Eagle ✈ "	0	0	0	0	0
Courtesy call Hello Michael, I have removed the Resolved tag which you placed on the Admins' Noticeboard article where you called me a a wiki-stalker. For ease of accesss i have recorded the section here where I explain why I have recorded it. Cheers.	0	0	0	0	0
Watch out for this guy below, he's so bossy and he continues to cyberbully be. What a total dumbfuck.	0	0	0	1	1
Deleting comments? Ya that's right delete my comment and keep your bias views hidden from the public!! Gambon is Irish and always will be!!! over and out	1	0	0	0	0
We have sources calling the Juggalos a gang. We have sources calling the men Juggalos. We have sources showing they were convicted of the crime. Fine, we'll use two sources. Your objection was that they weren't convicted. We've proven they were. Your BLP concern is no longer valid. Do you have a conflicting RS that says explicitly states they're not Juggalos or gang affiliated?	0	0	0	0	0
"::Again, self submitted, not academic, not peer-reviewed, not exactly a ""recognised publishing house"" either, http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk and no way to check the credentials of the authors one way or another. But ""parental alienation"" can sometimes be a dubious field, certainly isn't universally recognised by the academic or medical mainstream. Does not accord with WP:SOURCE. "	0	0	0	0	0
"==talk:Kongregate== ""It works fine"" thanks for responding· Lygophile has spoken "	0	0	0	0	0
" Rayleigh scattering There is a ""citation needed"" at the claim that Rayleigh scattering can be seen. I just did some research on Rayleigh scattering in air; I added some content to Rayleigh scattering. The bottom line is that at atmospheric pressure, Rayleigh scattering at 532 nm is about 10^-5 per meter. A 1 mW green laser has a luminous power of 0.6 lumen, and hence rayleigh scattering is 6e-6 lumen per meter over a 2 mm beam (a 0.002 m2 surface). The beam will hence appear roughly as if it were illuminated at 6e-6/0.002 = 3 millilux, which is comparable to a moonless clear night sky. (I should actually correct the number to deal with the angular distribution). A dark-adapted eye should be able to see this, especially when you look along the beam, which multiplies the apparent brightness by 1/sin(theta) where theta=0 deg means you look paralell to the beam. Now I'm not sure how to turn this original research into verifiable encyclopedic content. (t) "	0	0	0	0	0
Responded here: Talk:OnSMASH#Notability.3F	0	0	0	0	0
" Your GA nomination of The Boat Race 1967 The article The Boat Race 1967 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Boat Race 1967 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an ""In the news"" or ""Did you know"" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. (talk) (cont) "	0	0	0	0	0
If you can read, you know who and where. 190.44.133.67	0	0	0	0	0
is not joke. joke is funny. is like saying make joke about greedy jewish are is not racist. is simple statement of fact. you are whitewash. is this place for politics or place for facts?	3	0	0	0	1
" Muskellunge Hello, I added a spam +tag to the external links section and removed the commercial link. The ""Toothy Critters"" page is not for profit and has a large meaningful amount of information. I would like to see that link stay. What do you think ? "	0	0	0	0	0
Nike Skateboarding As prestigious as the brand seems to be, including your name on the Nike Skateboarding Wikipedia page will not lead to improved chances of sponsorship, or anything of the sort. Please desist from further edits that serve no purpose whatsoever to either the Internet or skateboarding communities. Thank you. Regards,	0	0	0	0	0
" Is that why you've been stalking my talk page at ridiculous levels? You're taking the ""authority"" you have for a VOLUNTEER position waaaaay too seriously. "	0	0	0	0	1
WikiProject Infoboxes I just noticed you were placing infoboxes on several of the projects and although I think that its largely a good Idea and quite beneficial I noticed that you were using a generic Portal:United States for all of them. I recommend, at the very least, adding the state portal as well. As I have found over the last couple months the state projects are easily offended and will begin spinning up at a pretty high RPM if they feel that WPUS is being thrust upon them.	0	0	0	0	1
Sysop Congratulations! After getting 100% support on RfA, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. Good luck. . 21:37, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
NAZIS never know when to give up...and don't like the truth being thrown at them. I have no idea who you are, typical little nazi, but I know who sent you. And now you know, I am the Mossad.	3	0	0	0	2
" Alberta republicans It was dead a minute ago when I deleted it! Honest! ofg✐ "	0	0	0	0	0
" There are no other ""established usernames"" that use this IP, and that's beside the point. This is a small business IP, and we have multiple users at this site every day. The rights of all should not be compromised by the actions of one bad apple. "	0	0	0	0	0
Vapour Good idea. Please do so.	0	0	0	0	0
\|politician-priority=low \|listas=Douglas, John St Leger	0	0	0	0	0
If they keep it up I will just semi-protect the article. (talk)	0	0	0	0	0
User:???? Yeah, I've been noticing poor puncuation and unprofessional writing of the sypnosis' for the past couple of episodes - they seem to be more appropriate for a fan page than an encyclopedia...something should be done.	0	0	0	0	0
" First off, your baseless accusations. You accused me of bad faith. Precious. As recently as yesterday you refereed to the inclusion of Dado Prso's first name in the article (as is the case on hundreds of other sportspeople bios throughout Wiki), as a ""Serb nationalist talking point"", a ""thinly veiled political advocacy"", and an ""unverified Serbian name claim"", also back in 2006 you were dismissive of the AFP source, at one point even calling for Prso's ID scan. When I brought this up, your response was calling it a figment of my imagination and making ridiculous accusations of bad faith!? You also accused me of proving a point, basing it on my mere presence here. The only reason I'm here posting on this page now is your removal of Prso's first name based on a claim that its inclusion is "" tendentious & unreferenced"". Clearly there are and there have been references on this page all along. Frankly I found it extremely unlikely that someone as nit-picky and anal as you would fail to notice the references on the talk page when you removed the first name from the article, but I guess it's possible. Also, as per your ""I (Joy) didn't overlook anything - none of these links were referenced in the article or in the talk page"" claim, it is not true. The first three links I presented to you just above have been on this talk page page for 8 years (and the AFP story from the FIFA official page is among them) and you clearly were aware of them back in 2006 as the ANON referenced them when addressing you directly and you even mention some explicitly yourself in your responses. So assuming in good faith that your failure to notice them now in 2014 was an honest oversight on your part I have to inform you once again that you DID overlook them because they've been here all this time. For the dissection of the Nezavisne ref, I'm not even sure what you're pushing and arguing for there. Nobody on this page, least of all me, has disputed that he goes by Dado (the article is called Dado Prso in case you failed to notice that too) so why you felt compelled to argue that is beyond me. From the best that I could gather, you don't want his first name Miladin in the intro, but you can live with it in the 'early career' section and you're basing all of this this on the fact that when you total them up most references are to Dado and Miladin, which is completely ridiculous, IF this is what you're arguing for (if not forget the previous sentence). Yes, of course they're to Dado, this is what he goes by, but that doesn't negate his first name. "	0	0	0	0	1
I agree this is a bad idea. Merging Soteriology with Salvation would be like merging Geography with Earth... one is a concept, the other is a field of study – close, but not exactly the same thing.	0	0	0	0	0
Giving you notice	0	0	0	0	0
" I have no idea what it is you are saying. '''''' - "	0	0	0	0	0
" It seems the paragraph starting with ""Emanuel Lasker answered these criticisms by..."" deals with achievements in tournaments whereas the next one, starting with ""Lasker's match record was..."" deals with achievements in matches. But then the match against Schlechter should be in this second paragraph, not in the first one. "	0	0	0	0	0
Thanks for blocking me you ignorant cunt. What type of fucking Gaga fan are you when you delete official information? Honest to fucking god no-one can do anything on Wikipedia anymore due to people like you. But no, thanks for ruining Wikipedia you fucking asshole.	0	2	0	0	2
" of ""Aryanem Vaejo"""	2	0	0	0	0
" Why should the name be shortened? ""BMW"" is hardly a long word. The FIA refused permission for the name change, and thus the team did not change it, so it must therefore be seen to be wrong to remove the ""BMW"" part of the name. It may ""essentially"" be a return to pre-BMW Sauber, but officially, it isn't. And that's all that matters. Also, I reiterate, it is unverifiable. "	0	0	0	0	0
That was my point. I wanted to rewrite the entire plot in a detailed, dramatic, and descriptive manner, so we could trim it afterwards using precision and structure, resulting in a concise summary that contained all notable details required to make a good plot. The way it is now would be a great plot for a movie, but since it's for a video game, I thought it would be best to start off powerful, then work our way down to make it as concise as the plot seen for Arkham City. The current plot is by no means the final plot, there's still more trimming, wiki-linking, rewording, and copy editing to do. Think about it in a reader's perspective, which of the two points you've made up there capture your attention more? We still have work to do. I'm sure this will have a great result at the end. -	0	0	0	0	0
" I like your different section headings, but there are a few grammatical errors. There should be a comma after Dolan in the introduction paragraph. Perhaps you could add a picture of the theatre. In the early years section after ""$3 million"" the with of ""with Dolan"" should be lower case. I can see you are not done writing or editing your topic. Make sure that you include internal citations! "	0	0	0	0	0
Please stop adding this material. If you continue to add POV statements against consensus, your edits will be considered vandalism and you may be blocked from editing. Everybody who has commented on this page would far rather discuss your changes with you and arrive at a page that satisfies everybody. Thanks.	0	0	0	0	0
I'm glad to see you're assuming good faith. -	0	0	0	0	0
Why??? You said i was editing wrongly when i wasn't so i want an opology u silly cunt you can f**k off for all i care get a life dick head	0	1	0	0	2
"::: I think I got all the notes, just adding about Relay then over to you again... Thanks, ty.007 "	0	0	0	0	0
you suck you suck as in cock thanks bye	0	2	0	0	1

Well, he (Wormy) is also a character in one episode of that show, so that's probably why. Perhaps it should be a disambiguation page instead? — | Talk

0

SUCK MY COCK WIKIPEDIA EDITORS...FUCKING ASSHOLE DORKS. JUST TRYING TO MAKE THE SITE BETTER YOU UPTIGHT CUNTS

0

1

0

3

" Article needs review by nuclear physicist(s) Just skimming the introduction I found three rather significant factual errors which I corrected. I review those here. The first point was that the article insisted that fusion occurs between like-charged atomic nuclei, but this limitation is not true. For example, a nuclear reaction of 12C+16O can proceed through the fusion channel, yet their atomic charge differs. There are literally hundreds of such cases, and citation would be gregarious and seems unnecessary (but I can link a few articles if anyone disputes this point). The article suggested that two protons can fuse, and even suggested that such a reaction is governed by the nuclear strong force. Not true. p+p->d is a weak interaction, because you must convert a proton into a neutron. Weak interactions are not fusion. This error leads to a more general point. Simply putting nuclei together to make something heavier does not constitute fusion. A common misconception is that nuclear fusion refers to any coalescence of nuclei, but in nuclear physics, fusion is a specific reaction mechanism. I will need to confirm, but I believe that, for example, the reactions in the CNO cycles proceed mainly through radiative capture, which isn't fusion. I can find comments in the introduction instructing me not to correct the ""general"" statement about nucleosynthesis, but the point is that this is generalized so much that it is incorrect. I can even find comments there saying not to link to the s-process, but the s-process does not involve fusion reactions as far as I know. There are actually a rather limited number of stellar nucleosynthesis cases that actually proceed through the fusion mechanism, such as carbon burning and oxygen burning. These are literally the only two examples I can think of off hand that I'm sure proceed via fusion. All the rest I'm fairly dubious about at the moment, although some of the pp-chain reactions may also be fusion. Thus, we in fact need likely a whole section explaining the nuclear physics of fusion and what it is and what it is not. Finally, I noticed that the article suggested humans have never controlled fusion. This is naff. There are plenty of nuclear physics experiments which have not only controlled fusion, but made very careful measurements of the properties of the fusion mechanism at many energy scales. Clearly, the writer wanted to imply that fusion as a source of stable source of energy has never been achieved by humans, so this was changed to reflect that point. But given that I could find a serious physics error in every paragraph I read so far, clearly this article needs some serious attention Please do not revert my corrections without discussing the matter here or explicit citation indicating that I am incorrect. "

0

26, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Yes you can. The opinion is commonplace, and you have not answered any of the relevant points. 13

0

" Oh, forgot to respond here. It's been removed. Thanks for bringing this up. vecia "

0

Sorry, I didn't realize it was privileged correspondence. My bad.

0

OK, I'll leave it to your discretion. I've been creating articles on various past and present Olympians, and I've found red links to be useful in that regard, but I also see your point about many of them being destined to remain red links indefinitely.

0

REDIRECT Talk:Illinois Central Gulf commuter rail accident

0

I find your page racially insulting. It offends me when you state that you support the Indian Cricket team therefor i am reporting you to administrators and Harbhjan Singh

2

0

1

Book Hello, I saw by browsing through the contributions page for North Korea that you were the one who added Norbert Vollertsen's book to the list of further reading. I have been unable to locate this book anywhere. Do you have a copy or can you tell me where I could get a copy? Thank you! wookiekiller626 @ yahoo . com

0

" DrChrissy lied again and again Dr Chrissy wrote 'it is against Wikipedia policy', however the link she provided Wikipedia:No naming editors is a proposal, not a policy. DrChrissy lied again. For her many past lies see pages such as the talk page history of animal welfare and Marian Dawkins. 124.170.218.196 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.63.54 Johnuniq's removal of my text Hi CYl7EPTEMA777, Johnuniq has removed my text twice now. It made difficult for me to talk to you. He is wrong on the editing summary, I am happy and calm. I notice you mentioned Johnuniq is a sockpuppet on the talk page, thanks for the information, I should have thought of that: he conducted person attack to me on many occasions. This show what kind of person he is. The text Johnuniq tried to remove are factual statement of misconducts, it is backed up by evidence. as documented here, DrChrissy and Johnuniq has been harassing the valid contribution of CYl7EPTEMA777 and other editors. 124.168.30.60 "

0

1

Idiot Your revert of my edits to 'Whistleblower' shows that you did not look at them at all. I in fact removed nonsense that was to be removed anyway by another user several days later. Do not presume that I am a vandal! Jun 9, 2006

0

1

" Youc an report me if you want, but that ""report"" will be removed as well, as it in invalid, for I have only been reverting vandalism. If you don't want to swallow your pride and admit you are wrong, well, that's your problem, not mine. "

0

1

Don't delete this message like the previous one. I want this post to be something of a message for you to see what kind of STALKER you are

0

1

Wikipedia style Thanks for the pointer. That was a missing element in my Wikipedia education.

0

" Favor Ejgreen77, can you please do me a favor? Can you tag Brian Wickstrom with ""{{userreq}}""? You had created him as a redirect to go to Louisiana–Monroe Warhawks. The problem is, Wickstrom is on Template:Louisiana–Monroe Warhawks athletic director navbox and anyone clicking it will think they're being taken to his article. Head coaches, athletic directors, and team seasons of NCAA Division I football and men's basketball programs should never be redirects since they're notable. By you tagging the redirect that you created with ""{{userreq}}"", an admin can come in and delete it. Thanks. "

0

" original research this looks like original research to me, esp. the first paragraph. maybe some cited content will appear but after the ""cool"" ""african philosophy"" fiasco i'm not so hopeful. "

1

0

Pablo and victor :Pablo and victor A tag has been placed on Pablo and victor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Pablo and victor. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SUBWAYguy

0

Romanian language Romanian language is spoken about 26-30 millions people in the world. It is not spoken only in Romania I hope you do realize this?! If in the articles it is written that in one country is one language (e.g. Romanian for Romania and Moldovan language for Moldova) then it's a false and must be corrected. You have to understand this. There are 3 things that may cover the truth: 1. indifference 2. escapism 3. ... till next time if ever.

0

" AFR rouY you are quite welcome dude... enjoy the mop... theres a lot of cleaning to do. ™ "

0

I agree with Karanacs, a notables section isn't necessary. Just linking to the main article is fine. Before we start adding organizations like Singing Cadets, Aggie Wranglers, SCONA, we need to agree upon it; we can't add everything to do with A&M; on this template (particularly student life aspects). I think SCONA or Singing Cadets might be notable enough (I really don't know much about either), but I wouldn't recommend including Aggie Wranglers. Remember this template should include aspects of A&M; that users will most likely be looking for. -

0

AW I WANT TO BLOCK WERT WERT NAH YOU FUCKING TERDS

0

1

up (Talk) (Talk) (Talk) Blocked for blanking Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Walking Game (Talk)

0

Thanks WLU. I have tried to find the book - it's very truncated on google books, so I am trying to find it in a library. I will def. take a look and discuss. Certainly the points and views held by this book are representative of a number of medical professionals. Will return to the topic once I find it.

0

2009 (UTC) Fully endorsed!. Further, if you read his , you'll notice he has an almost full-scale Zoo in his living quarters, which leads me to believe that, besides being a complete nuisance, this creep is also a fag. What else is left for him? He seems to derive pleasure in annoying other editors by consistently destroying their edits. And still he asks to be treated with civility! What he deserves is a good kick in the arse, maybe many at that! 12:40, 17 October

0

3

0

3

image i have uploaded a better image, buti do not know how to put it on herpage. Can someone else do it, just press undo in the history page.

0

i hate you for deleting my stuff im going to hunt you down and slice you up and cook you for my baby ) have a nice day hun

0

3

" = On going battle with Steve Irwins parents not mentioned = curious why this battle of greed and etc was left out. is it against the rules to highlight the not pretty side of the truth? truth be told her public image kinda paints her as well nevermind.. just curious why the negitive is filtered out. I'm no wiki scholar so I really don't know just asking. I'm sure one of the people that can edit ""semi protected"" stuff wold know what's allowed what's not and what isn't added on purpose."

0

" Night: Here's your cite, which actually addresses several of your wishes: WP Biographies of Living Persons. You should look especially to: ""Using the subject as a self-published source"" - it states that ""the article is not based primarily on such sources."". Thirteen of your eighteen source references are to Pedro and Me, or Winick's personal sites (yes, IMDB counts). For example, you cite the book as the reason for keeping in the discussion of Rainey, while I repeat-it's an isolated, non-turning-point event in his life. It is appropriate for the Real World page, perhaps, but here it's a little off-topic. You might as well put in the name of a flavor of ice cream he doesn't like, or that someone was mean to him in middle school. It's just not important enough for what should be a short bio. And a link to Zamora's bio can cover his illness, a mention that he had HIV/AIDS and was ill covers him quite nicelythere's no need to go into it, except for the impact it had on Winick. I'm just trying to get the article back on track as a one-topic writing hereI'm not ""accusing"" you of anything. To answer your direct question, see the heading ""Presumption in Favor of Privacy"", under ""Privacy of Birthdays"" on the same page-it may be published elsewhere, but I don't know that he's quite notable enough to justify keeping the full date-where's the harm in only noting the year? It seems a fairly harmless, sensible change to me. Also, can someone who is more familiar with the subject add back a criticisms section? As there are two of us, at least, that came to WP solely to find out what the controversy surrounding him might be, can someone add this information? I'm still in the dark. ) "

0

Why is the q&A; regarding her book being deleted? Those are her exact words in response to the questions about the inaccuracies in her book. I can forward the email from her if need be.

0

MY PAGE 3234434aAa Your just a mean OLD BULLSHITTING fart...as you would put it.

0

1

" Can't sleep, clown will eat me The last time he was here was March 31 last year. I think it's unlikely you'll get a response. Shadow "

0

1

" I hope you have learned your lesson 1. Do not be a troll. 2. Do not accuse a user of ""vandalism"" when he is guilty of no such thing. Why are you a sysop if you lack the requisite skills, knowledge, and experience? I will leave that as a point for you to ponder. Stop attacking the work of an editor more experienced than yourself. At Seneca College, 142.204.42.82 "

0

1

I see evidence of a broad if not total consensus here. There's no point debating it forever. I have made the move. Hesperian

0

Pembroke sucks.com I am from the pembroke area and I found the link to pembroke sucks usefull and interesting. It is as far as I know the only forum dedicated to pembroke and the pembroke area. I say: as far as policy is concerned, coming on here everyday to remove a link that walks the line between usefull and not usefull is imho a little excesive. I understand that the people who run pembroke sucks also don't seem to know when enough is enough (I myself have removed large adds for their site from the pembroke article) and they should get the hint (like.. you don't own this site, and technically your link shouldn't be here. So why do you think it is somehow your right to post it?)but really.... its a link... its not even in the main body of the article. This is not a gateway to some larger problem. Let it go. stop being a link nazi. and stop posting your link where its not welcome. This is not one of the articles where links are used to support points of view (like on, i don't know, white power sites) so whats the big deal?

0

1

The British spelling is -paedia. The ligature is archaic and only survives in the Britannica's proper name. Now fix that mess you created back to the correct way as it stood for years.

0

No, I am not threatening and vandalizing, please don't accuse me of something that based on your own opinion and with no substantial proof. I need an apology here. I am saying that the italian coach's comments and the chinese coach's comments could also be included in the US gymnasts pages because they are just like the comments on Deng's size and tooth, opinions without proof. But the comments about Deng can be included and the comments about the US gymnansts cannot. They are all from reliable sources, they are verified, and the media are reporting fact that the chinese and italian coaches made comments about foreign and US gymnasts could be doping because they are muscular. Just tell me the difference between the comments between on Deng and the US gymnasts? They both based on opinions, not evidence but one can be included and the other cannot. I asked for evidence to support the comments made on Deng, but again you ignore it. You are really biased here. Do we have third party here to do the judgement? Or do I have tolerate your biased view and your accusation on me?

1

0

It wouldn't be disinformation to allow 10% of the article space - which at the moment reads like a eulogy - to a representative selection of scholarly reception for these theories.

0

" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — (Talk) "

0

, wow, good snag..

0

Thanks for the compliment.

0

JTF The initials in my name is JTF, and i was born the day after this force was made! 14. april 1993 =D

0

Isn't it against policy to block someone without warning? Especially if they didn't harass anyone in the first place? 84.16.230.15

0

I AM TRYING SO HARD NOT TO LOOSE MY TEMPER SARAH STOP DELETING THE CATEGORY OF WHOVIANS WHY DO YOU KEEP DELETING IT WHY WHY WHY

0

1

" I think that we should use the official player's name, and not the IRB ""transcription"". If IRB doesn't care about accents, we do. After all, it's making a (little) mistake. "

0

" EDIT: I just finished trying to cleaup the tone of the article. I tried to make stylistic improvements and fix grammatical errors as well as remove unnecesary or irrelevant information. The article still needs a lot of work, especially since the article is huge, but only has 8 citations. A few suggestons: —-Add citations! —-Remove the ""Fashionista"" section, or at least change it radically. This seems more like fanworship than anything. —-Organise and complete the ""Acting"" and ""Television"" sections (after ""Controversies"") —-Clean up the style and tone of the article some more —-Don't use ""Regine"" to refer to her, it's not encyclopedic. Hopefully I'll be able to work on the article some more; I'm also excited to see the additions/changes that others will make. The article has tons of potential. "

0

All of you can SUCK IT!

0

2

Once again, sources? Look up Devadasi on UN.org, the UN describes the dalit girls as VICTIMS, and the practice as a form of prostitution. If HRW and the UN are anti-Hindu, who's reliable?

2

1

2

0

See Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources.

0

Blocked for 3RR vio As per above, you are blocked from editing WP for 24 hours.

0

"::With due respect to the noble Drrll, one the finest Wikipedia editors with whom I have ever had the honor of collaborating, I would be content with . Informing the reader that Media Matters describes itself as ""politically progressive"" and that it is dedicated to fighting ""conservative misinformation"", for all intents and purposes, tells him or her that MMFA is LIBERAL. "

0

Hello Bluerasberry, yes I am in charge of Communications for the ACTG and wanted to update the page with a few more dates to make the history section more current. I am new to Wikipedia and any assistance posting would be appreciated. How can I post these changes without them being deleted? ACTGNetwork

0

done, actualyl quoted your old line, albeit in shorter form. ta ta

0

Dyslexic reply As usual, T-man uses a personal attack on me rather than defend his work. If there is an error in a fact, FIX IT. The issue is not errors, it is format. And T-Man's format and syle is horrendous. Nothing he just said is (a) intelligible, or (b) useful in explaining why his substantial rewrites are preferable. The intro should IDENTIFY key villains, not go into detail on each one. That is what the rest of the article is for, and beyond that, any given villians own wiki.

0

1

Firstly, he called me a hypocrite. And secondly, I said that Muhammad was not at all violent or vindictive or insane.

0

1

0

" An entry from appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 30 January, 2007."

0

Sockpuppet of Flyhead I'm just a new user, not a sockpuppet of Flyhead!!!

0

"Since it has now been established that this discussion refers to a subsequently titled and reinterpreted revision of the original 2001 (untitled) two-sentence petition calling for ""skeptical examination of evidence for scientific theories"" and since there is no reliable source to DI's controversial linking of the 103 signers of the original untitled petition to its subsequently titled, reinterpreted, and repurposed version, I propose archiving or deleting this section as it has now been revealed that there is no reliably sourced connection of the retitled and reinterpreted document to the subject of this biography article. "

0

Wet Willie is an extremely underrated band, and I have a sneaking suspicion it may becuase of their name. Nevertheless, they are extremely talented for who they were, and one would be surprised the clear sound and strong arrangements which may up this band.

0

February 2012 (UTC) Mazza, the source for this section, uses imitation of Christ 13:09, 10

0

. So your edit replaced a debatable statement we don't have a source for with one that is essentially just nonsense

0

1

" Talkback Thanks man.....:) Eagle ✈ "

0

Courtesy call Hello Michael, I have removed the Resolved tag which you placed on the Admins' Noticeboard article where you called me a a wiki-stalker. For ease of accesss i have recorded the section here where I explain why I have recorded it. Cheers.

0

Watch out for this guy below, he's so bossy and he continues to cyberbully be. What a total dumbfuck.

0

1

Deleting comments? Ya that's right delete my comment and keep your bias views hidden from the public!! Gambon is Irish and always will be!!! over and out

1

0

We have sources calling the Juggalos a gang. We have sources calling the men Juggalos. We have sources showing they were convicted of the crime. Fine, we'll use two sources. Your objection was that they weren't convicted. We've proven they were. Your BLP concern is no longer valid. Do you have a conflicting RS that says explicitly states they're not Juggalos or gang affiliated?

0

"::Again, self submitted, not academic, not peer-reviewed, not exactly a ""recognised publishing house"" either, http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk and no way to check the credentials of the authors one way or another. But ""parental alienation"" can sometimes be a dubious field, certainly isn't universally recognised by the academic or medical mainstream. Does not accord with WP:SOURCE. "

0

"==talk:Kongregate== ""It works fine"" thanks for responding· Lygophile has spoken "

0

" Rayleigh scattering There is a ""citation needed"" at the claim that Rayleigh scattering can be seen. I just did some research on Rayleigh scattering in air; I added some content to Rayleigh scattering. The bottom line is that at atmospheric pressure, Rayleigh scattering at 532 nm is about 10^-5 per meter. A 1 mW green laser has a luminous power of 0.6 lumen, and hence rayleigh scattering is 6e-6 lumen per meter over a 2 mm beam (a 0.002 m2 surface). The beam will hence appear roughly as if it were illuminated at 6e-6/0.002 = 3 millilux, which is comparable to a moonless clear night sky. (I should actually correct the number to deal with the angular distribution). A dark-adapted eye should be able to see this, especially when you look along the beam, which multiplies the apparent brightness by 1/sin(theta) where theta=0 deg means you look paralell to the beam. Now I'm not sure how to turn this original research into verifiable encyclopedic content. (t) "

0

Responded here: Talk:OnSMASH#Notability.3F

0

" Your GA nomination of The Boat Race 1967 The article The Boat Race 1967 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Boat Race 1967 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an ""In the news"" or ""Did you know"" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. (talk) (cont) "

0

If you can read, you know who and where. 190.44.133.67

0

is not joke. joke is funny. is like saying make joke about greedy jewish are is not racist. is simple statement of fact. you are whitewash. is this place for politics or place for facts?

3

0

1

" Muskellunge Hello, I added a spam +tag to the external links section and removed the commercial link. The ""Toothy Critters"" page is not for profit and has a large meaningful amount of information. I would like to see that link stay. What do you think ? "

0

Nike Skateboarding As prestigious as the brand seems to be, including your name on the Nike Skateboarding Wikipedia page will not lead to improved chances of sponsorship, or anything of the sort. Please desist from further edits that serve no purpose whatsoever to either the Internet or skateboarding communities. Thank you. Regards,

0

" Is that why you've been stalking my talk page at ridiculous levels? You're taking the ""authority"" you have for a VOLUNTEER position waaaaay too seriously. "

0

1

WikiProject Infoboxes I just noticed you were placing infoboxes on several of the projects and although I think that its largely a good Idea and quite beneficial I noticed that you were using a generic Portal:United States for all of them. I recommend, at the very least, adding the state portal as well. As I have found over the last couple months the state projects are easily offended and will begin spinning up at a pretty high RPM if they feel that WPUS is being thrust upon them.

0

1

Sysop Congratulations! After getting 100% support on RfA, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. Good luck. . 21:37, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

0

NAZIS never know when to give up...and don't like the truth being thrown at them. I have no idea who you are, typical little nazi, but I know who sent you. And now you know, I am the Mossad.

3

0

2

" Alberta republicans It was dead a minute ago when I deleted it! Honest! ofg✐ "

0

" There are no other ""established usernames"" that use this IP, and that's beside the point. This is a small business IP, and we have multiple users at this site every day. The rights of all should not be compromised by the actions of one bad apple. "

0

Vapour Good idea. Please do so.

0

|politician-priority=low |listas=Douglas, John St Leger

0

If they keep it up I will just semi-protect the article. (talk)

0

User:???? Yeah, I've been noticing poor puncuation and unprofessional writing of the sypnosis' for the past couple of episodes - they seem to be more appropriate for a fan page than an encyclopedia...something should be done.

0

" First off, your baseless accusations. You accused me of bad faith. Precious. As recently as yesterday you refereed to the inclusion of Dado Prso's first name in the article (as is the case on hundreds of other sportspeople bios throughout Wiki), as a ""Serb nationalist talking point"", a ""thinly veiled political advocacy"", and an ""unverified Serbian name claim"", also back in 2006 you were dismissive of the AFP source, at one point even calling for Prso's ID scan. When I brought this up, your response was calling it a figment of my imagination and making ridiculous accusations of bad faith!? You also accused me of proving a point, basing it on my mere presence here. The only reason I'm here posting on this page now is your removal of Prso's first name based on a claim that its inclusion is "" tendentious & unreferenced"". Clearly there are and there have been references on this page all along. Frankly I found it extremely unlikely that someone as nit-picky and anal as you would fail to notice the references on the talk page when you removed the first name from the article, but I guess it's possible. Also, as per your ""I (Joy) didn't overlook anything - none of these links were referenced in the article or in the talk page"" claim, it is not true. The first three links I presented to you just above have been on this talk page page for 8 years (and the AFP story from the FIFA official page is among them) and you clearly were aware of them back in 2006 as the ANON referenced them when addressing you directly and you even mention some explicitly yourself in your responses. So assuming in good faith that your failure to notice them now in 2014 was an honest oversight on your part I have to inform you once again that you DID overlook them because they've been here all this time. For the dissection of the Nezavisne ref, I'm not even sure what you're pushing and arguing for there. Nobody on this page, least of all me, has disputed that he goes by Dado (the article is called Dado Prso in case you failed to notice that too) so why you felt compelled to argue that is beyond me. From the best that I could gather, you don't want his first name Miladin in the intro, but you can live with it in the 'early career' section and you're basing all of this this on the fact that when you total them up most references are to Dado and Miladin, which is completely ridiculous, IF this is what you're arguing for (if not forget the previous sentence). Yes, of course they're to Dado, this is what he goes by, but that doesn't negate his first name. "

0

1

I agree this is a bad idea. Merging Soteriology with Salvation would be like merging Geography with Earth... one is a concept, the other is a field of study – close, but not exactly the same thing.

0

Giving you notice

0

" I have no idea what it is you are saying. '''''' - "

0

" It seems the paragraph starting with ""Emanuel Lasker answered these criticisms by..."" deals with achievements in tournaments whereas the next one, starting with ""Lasker's match record was..."" deals with achievements in matches. But then the match against Schlechter should be in this second paragraph, not in the first one. "

0

Thanks for blocking me you ignorant cunt. What type of fucking Gaga fan are you when you delete official information? Honest to fucking god no-one can do anything on Wikipedia anymore due to people like you. But no, thanks for ruining Wikipedia you fucking asshole.

0

2

0

2

" of ""Aryanem Vaejo"""

2

0

" Why should the name be shortened? ""BMW"" is hardly a long word. The FIA refused permission for the name change, and thus the team did not change it, so it must therefore be seen to be wrong to remove the ""BMW"" part of the name. It may ""essentially"" be a return to pre-BMW Sauber, but officially, it isn't. And that's all that matters. Also, I reiterate, it is unverifiable. "

0

That was my point. I wanted to rewrite the entire plot in a detailed, dramatic, and descriptive manner, so we could trim it afterwards using precision and structure, resulting in a concise summary that contained all notable details required to make a good plot. The way it is now would be a great plot for a movie, but since it's for a video game, I thought it would be best to start off powerful, then work our way down to make it as concise as the plot seen for Arkham City. The current plot is by no means the final plot, there's still more trimming, wiki-linking, rewording, and copy editing to do. Think about it in a reader's perspective, which of the two points you've made up there capture your attention more? We still have work to do. I'm sure this will have a great result at the end. -

0

" I like your different section headings, but there are a few grammatical errors. There should be a comma after Dolan in the introduction paragraph. Perhaps you could add a picture of the theatre. In the early years section after ""$3 million"" the with of ""with Dolan"" should be lower case. I can see you are not done writing or editing your topic. Make sure that you include internal citations! "

0

Please stop adding this material. If you continue to add POV statements against consensus, your edits will be considered vandalism and you may be blocked from editing. Everybody who has commented on this page would far rather discuss your changes with you and arrive at a page that satisfies everybody. Thanks.

0

I'm glad to see you're assuming good faith. -

0

Why??? You said i was editing wrongly when i wasn't so i want an opology u silly cunt you can f**k off for all i care get a life dick head

0

1

0

2

"::: I think I got all the notes, just adding about Relay then over to you again... Thanks, ty.007 "

0

you suck you suck as in cock thanks bye

0

2

0

1