tcapelle/kaggle-toxic-annotated-filtered · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 6 5k	racial_origin int64 0 3	gender_sex int64 0 3	religion int64 0 3	ability int64 0 3	violence int64 0 3
" To the IP reverter Please do not continue to revert mine and others effort to improve this article without discussion. I have made several edits to the article which you seem to think can be treated as one. This is not the case. Contraventions of WP:Bio must, and I stress must, be reverted on sight. You simply cannot have potential libelous material in an article which you have now twice put back in. It simply cannot stay without a VERY strong reference. Truth has nothing to do with it. If it cant be verified it can't stay. Further, ""watched by billions"" isnt even worth a fact tag. It is simply untrue. Nothing has ever been watched by 2 billion people or more. It not true or sourced. ""Comebacking"" is not a word. Ray Leonard had 1 championship fight at middleweight. He is far more noted as a welterweight. WP:NPOV is requirement of all articles. Reverting all efforts to bring this article into line with policy is tantamount to disruption. If you continue I will seek protection for the page so only registered editors can edit it. "	0	0	0	0	1
I also just noticed: he simultaneously went after these same articles on the french Wikipedia, where he has ALSO been banned. See , for example. As I've said before, this editor simply refuses to give up, no matter how many warnings he is given.	0	0	0	0	0
":::* I'm not using jabs or insults of any kind. ""Greek-centric"" means ""centered on Greece or concerns relating thereto"". That's an accurate description of the view that things relating to Greece use words (in English) derived from Greek-language Hellas on the basis that Greeks themselves prefer this term. If this were a discussion about Germans wanting everything about Germany to use Deutsche in English too, that would be a German-centric concern (i.a. a concern centered on Germany, Germans, and their preferences). NB: I actually know Germans who insist that we should stop saying ""German"" and ""Germany"" (and that the Spanish should stop using Alemán), and everyone use ""Deutsche"" and ""Deutschland"", so, no, it is not a red herring fallacy at all, but a comparison chosen carefully (though not carefully enough; see a bit later). Your own counter however, is a straw man fallacy; no one said anything about transliterating vs. not transliterating, so the ""Ελλάς"" argument is a complete non sequitur. I do agree that Hellenic is an English word, and concede the point that the Deutsche comparison wasn't very apt after all; I was focused more on the situational than linguistic similarity when I chose it. A better example would be expecting our articles about Japan and the Japanese to use Nippon and Nipponese to better match the native name of the country; these are in fact words in English. It would actually make sense to do that than to do what's been proposed here, because ""Nipponese"" has no confusing alternative meaning, unlike ""Hellenic"" which commonly, probably commonly, refers to ancient Greek culture in English, not modern. —  ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ "	0	0	0	0	0
" That's nearly there. It should be ""\| last = Peel\| first = John"", and the ""authorlink"" gets filled in automatically. But if you're co-crediting Sheila, which I think is proper, it you need to add in ""last2 = Ravenscroft \| first2 = Sheila \| author2-link = "" after the above fields. Let me know if you get stuck, and congratulations for giving up law. Apart from the money, I haven't regretted it. '''''' (Talk) "	0	0	0	0	0
January 2010 (UTC) GoRight, you are not imagining this and you are well within your rights to point this out. I recommend you file a complaint. 18:58, 27	0	0	0	0	0
REDIRECT Talk:Stora mossen metro station	0	0	0	0	0
that the editor provided	0	0	0	0	0
YOU SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!	0	0	0	0	1
Re: Admin help needed Can't say I can recall seeing anything like this before. I find it curious a police force would be going through Wikipedia entries to look for someone they want to speak to... I'd leave things as they are and see if anything develops.	0	0	0	0	0
, I never go 1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4. Okay,	0	0	0	0	0
Brian, why don't you tell us about your arrest record? ]	0	0	0	0	0
You could have and should have done this from the beginning instead of acting like an abusive asshole (not to say to are an asshole because that would be an attack).	0	0	0	0	2
Mary Ambrose was not Robert Palmer's girlfriend at the time of his death, although they had been involved in a casual relationship. However, during the time period that Mary Ambrose was involved with Robert Palmer, she was involved with a number of men, even having two children, in 2001 and 2002, with men known to Robert Palmer. Mary Ambrose's son born in 2001 was fathered by Mick Carter, who was Robert Palmer's manager, until Palmer fired him in the second week of September. Unfortunately, since Mick Carter was the first person to discover that Robert Palmer had died, he took the opportunity to lie to the press on a number of points, including naming Mary Ambrose as Robert Palmer's girlfriend. Robert Palmer was no longer involved with Mary Ambrose before his death. His only contact with her at that point was trying to iron out a settlement agreement with Ambrose ensuring that she would not give interviews about him, or discuss him with the press. Mick Carter was not fond of Robert's true girlfriend, in fact he disliked her intently. Robert Palmer hadn't told many people about Mick Carter's firing, opting to complete his publicity appearances in Paris for Drive before doing so. Carter was fully aware of this, and took advantage of the situation. When it was discovered what he had done, and the surfeit of bogus and incorrect information that he had provided to the press worldwide, the information was invalidated due to his firing and credibility issues. Because of his close friendship with Mary Ambrose, he saw a money making opportunity for them in Robert Palmer's death. Carter even went so far as to stage a 'hoax' interview on Mary Ambrose's behalf, entitled Robert Palmer Was Addicted To My Love. The article appeared on the 28th of September, two days after the death of Palmer. The interview allegedly took place by phone, backed up by a signed release. When the interview was challenged by the family as being false, the interview was basically Robert Palmer emoting about Mary Ambrose, who his children knew he was no longer involved with in any vernacular at the time of his death, the article was revealed to be a hoax. At the time Robert Palmer was allegedly giving this interview by phone, he was in fact in attendance at a social function accompanied by three friends of his, who vouched he was with them the entire time the interview was allegedly taking place. As for the release, it was proven that Robert Palmer's signature was forged, and not a very good forgery at that. The article was to appear in three parts, but once the publishers realized that the article was a hoax, they cancelled the publication of the other two parts of the article and invalidated the one part that they had ran.	0	1	0	0	0
By the way, I am NOT the author of the Tebson article, I just came across it after it was tagged as a speedy deletion request.	0	0	0	0	0
As for Elvis's identification with the Jews, I have provided several reliable sources.	0	0	0	0	0
I am under attack! You guys are censoring any opinion that you do not agree with! And you have not responded to ANY of my proofs to my point of view.	0	0	0	0	1
REDIRECT User talk:Onorem/Archive 10	0	0	0	0	0
I thank you for cleaning that up when I look at that article, all I can see is the advertisement for Photoshop which is there and I am simply confused, disappointed and well somewhat curious the way you might be when driving your car past an accident on the road, that sick and sad and morbid kind of curious that makes it so I cannot seem to look elsewhere. carol Inktool! See above comment! I had no idea that the article called pathtool inktool! It becomes evident that the authors of the article are perhaps more familiar with Photoshop. There are days in which I am full of crap, but today I seem to be full of simile. I am female, so the POV is female. While reviewing that article, it was like watching the plumber work, perhaps where all I can see is that crack that is exposed right above the waistline, so much so that I did not notice that the plumber was wearing a skirt and that his slip was also showing. This is to thank you for having the stamina and a strength of good character enough so that you could look past the crack; I couldn't do this.... carol	0	2	0	0	0
"==Notability== I do not know, but it this bio really notable enough? Chat "	0	0	0	0	0
and defamatory remarks	0	0	0	0	1
" Is 4:2:1 a supermajority? What, did they have a thirty-second timeframe for this supposed consensus? Sheesh. What a pile of crap that one is! ☥ "	0	0	0	0	1
" Can you help me then? Durzatwink has repeatedly made spelling and grammar errors and when I tried fixing them, he reverted it to his version. contribsTALK "	0	0	0	0	0
Why does IGN list it as M then? I have no idea, IGN is usually very reliable, but XBOX is too....72.138.216.89	0	0	0	0	0
WHo hired Lanner and who the superiors are NOT relevant to the article on NCSY it AT MOST belongs on the Lanner page, and even there is isnt relevant.	0	0	0	0	0
" Zbigniew Brzezinski pronunciation Hi, I've been enjoying your Polish audio samples. When you get some time, could you do one for Zbigniew Brzezinski? There's no urgency to it but maybe you could add it to your ""eventually"" list. He is still on American TV occasionally, and I think the US interviewers mangle his name pretty badly. 67.117.145.9 "	0	0	0	0	0
Quick Note Do not add anymore info to the following sections: Introduction/C-Block/A-Block/Iguana Town & House of Blood/Z-Block/Wiggin Block/Playoffs Pomade Ring Cyber City Former Maruhage Empire Hair Kingdom These section will be split into seperate article as StrangerAtaru and I discussed before.	0	0	0	0	0
I have seen people who have done far worse things things then myslef, only to have a blind eye turned to them or a slap on the writs. You have also wnet aginst your only policy by imposing this ban with out even an arbs com decision, which only goes to show that thei is no structue that works here and the the real power rest in the admins who serve as judge jury and exctionicure, by keeping me blcok you have also reused to try to engage me in any kind of defence aginst the blatent violitaions of blocking that has been permited.	0	0	0	0	1
I understand that a Wikipedist must judge in between reliabilities. But I am sure it does not mean he/she should delete any info which does not fit to his/her image of the article or, it does not suit to his/her own believes regarding particular topic. Sorry, but it looks to me like that regarding what happening here. I am providing info, which nobody found yet may be just because nobody was looking for it. The fact that I am limited in English or in Wiki skills does not necessary mean the info provided by myself must be ignored. All I am asking is stop deleting it and work it in.	0	0	0	1	0
Rough Justice Why did you delete my page?	0	0	0	0	0
") Trumpet, I certainly will let someone whose posts mainly consist of inaccuracies, insults, ignoring/misrepresenting others views and ""zombies"" tell me how I should refert to this fringe group. I don't care whether you are a JMer, but the rest of your comment reveals that you have no idea about the historical craft. Since you have been explained about Docetism, there's no use in repeating why it and the JesusMyth claim are different. You will not listen. (smile back) 20:27, 21 March 2006 (UTC"	0	0	1	0	1
Glad you had a good time. I chickened out I'm afraid. With a bit more notice I might. -)	0	0	0	0	0
" Ozgoodelawyer Guy = 1D10T This ozgoodelawyer guy is a bloody idiot who think this is place for to write his own story book. I thin we should ban this guy. He think he know everythin about because he a ""lawyer"" hahaha. Get real man. We have right to edit this too. Everyday he change evrything he dont like. Sombady pelase ban this idiot. "	0	0	0	2	1
explain to me by your rules and anyone elses rule of how i vandalised your page.because i did not i posted just like you do. you say you are a ME but you are not acting like a professional at all. changing my words to your words and vandalizing yourself. i am starting to think your so called works aon this page is false and unsatation, with no backing. thank you. so yeah this title is wrong. anynmous..	0	0	0	0	1
Re: Hebrew Wikipedia If the Hebrew Wikipedia has relevant external links, just use them in the article, instead of linking to Hebrew Wikipedia. We don't self-reference. (Talk)	0	0	0	0	0
" Quagga Hi, i see that you're changing categories at the ""Quagga"" article. It might be more correct to add Extinct mammals of Africa instead of Extinct animals of Africa, but Extinct mammals of Africa is a non-existent category. I would suggest to either create that category, or leave it in the extinct animals category. "	0	0	0	0	0
PROD Restorations Lar, Thanks for helping restore challenged PRODs. It would be even more helpful if you could remove the PROD tag while userifying them, as old prods will jump to the top of the WP:PRODSUM list, and may result in erroneous redeletion, but certainly looks a bit messy. Cheers,	0	0	0	0	0
— \| Talk 11:25, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
I note that you have thrice introduced the contested material on the QE page. Please keep in mind the 3 revert rule. I higly suggest a self-revert in order to show good faith.	0	0	0	0	0
October 2011 Please stop adding content with unreliable sources at 2012 AFC President's Cup. The revisions that you have made also do not apply to the 2012 AFC President's Cup.	0	0	0	0	0
" The Class action of Greek Cypriots has been on Cyprus dispute article since 28.03.2011. Now, after USA Federal Court rejected Greek Cypriots and decided that ""Greek Cypriots cannot claim that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots....Although the United States does not recognize it as a state, the TRNC purportedly operates as a democratic republic with a president, prime minister, legislature and judiciary...TRNC is not vulnerable to a lawsuit in Washington"", Hellens immediately removed it from Cyprus dispute page on 15.10.2014 by the 31.153.94.183. I strongly objected this kind of non-neutral stance till now, and definitely will object from now on. I hope that the number of fair people in WP will increase to take action against this blatant vandalisms. "	1	0	0	0	0
I try to tell people to just wait until it's confirmed on dojo, but they just ignore me. People like Sukecchi only point out the bad things I've done.	0	0	0	0	0
":::Mudblood is meant to be AS offensive as the n-word without actually being the n-word; so in a sense, you're correct. In the series, it's used the same way: as an inflamatory insult brought out by the hatred of someone's liniage. But simply beacause you see mudblood and think ""n-word"" says more about your personal perceptions than it does the intended use of the word. "	2	0	0	0	0
Scotland simply is not a country. If it is, show me your Scottish passport. Name a treaty to which Scotland is a party. Is Scotland a member of the United Nations? Sorry, but my comment was not racist.	0	0	0	0	0
Article title This lake is known as Arbuthnet Lake not Arbuthnot Lake. A quick Google search shows that the vast majority of quality sources highlight that the name of the lake is Arbuthnet Lake not Arbuthnot. Therefore per common name I propose to change the name back to Arbuthnet Lake.	0	0	0	0	0
" Daniel Vincent Kelley's Theory regarding this phrase First I want to point out that while it is CLAIMED in the article that Marie Antoinette was kind and noble and gracious of the peasants, NOTHING is cited to prove such. The one Antoinette quote that is offered to this end, smacks of sociopathology or her recognition that she would promote her OWN cause, by offering kindness to those who are proving themselves kind to her. There's nothing in the phrase to indicate that she was speaking of the whole of the French people, but it seems she was speaking about some particular people who had been particularly kind to her. Calculating psychopaths can be kind for this reason, so that they will enjoy camaraderie with their aids. So, this statement, that she felt she should be nice to the people who were being nice to her, certainly does NOT certify Marie Antoinette as kind hearted or noble. I suspect, that much as the phrase is thrown around today, it was probably thrown around by the clique of it's originator. They probably had a real laugh, suggesting things the peasants could eat, when they ran out of bread as happened under the leadership of every dictatorial monarchy. Here's how I imagine the phrase came to be said by Marie Antoinette is she heard her royal family, her mom and dad and step parents, maybe her grandparents, talking about what had been said in an age past, when the peasants ran out of food and started eying the national leadership as cause. Then, when she found herself in the situation, she used what was in her circle a cliche, that was widely unknown to the rest of the world. She probably didn't think much of saying it, she probably thought it would be received by her audience as cute and figured it would never get around, never become more widely known that she said it AND probably she hadn't really considered how callous it is when people are starving, to make light of it. So, my guess, is that, EXACTLY as the phrase is thrown around today for it being so pithy and the situation so often endured, peasants starving, Marie-Thérèse originated it, the phrase circulated amongst Royalty for 100 years, probably spoken of at dinner parties how pithy was Marie-Thérèse, how callous and witty and devilishly fun (from the sadistic royal perspective). So Marie-Thérèse originates it, Marie Antoinette's family speaks of it, tells the story. Marie Antoinette happens upon the same situation, bread shortage, she rehashes the phrase originated by Marie-Thérèse. Rouseau writing of it, attributing it to a Princess who he had not heard first hand say it, proves that the phrase was circulating in royal and educated circles. He says some earlier royal said it, presumably she said it to other royals and presumably Rouseau similarly heard it spoken by royals. So, obviously, if Marie-Thérèse said it, 100 years before Rouseau wrote it, obviously the phrase was conveyed by some royal story teller, who probably blathered on and on about all the corruption and hi-jinks those callous witty royals do, for love of reliving the old times and as ""lessons"" to the young royals on how to live. Marie Antoinette saying it, in royal company, would be like her saying, I'm on your side royal friends. It's basically a slightly witty way for Marie Antoinette to say she doesn't care how the peasants get through their hard times, how the royals deal with the peasants through those hard times, callous, is her intent and plan. It was a way of declaring her loyalty and making light of the situation. Many here have claimed that because Rouseau wrote it before Antoinette could possibly have said it, means that Antoinette never said it. That's OBVIOUSLY nonsense. She OBVIOUSLY didn't originate the phrase, credit Marie-Thérèse, but that wouldn't prevent her from spouting cliche as so many nim wits make habit."	0	0	0	0	0
And in your case, stop vandalising.	0	0	0	0	1
" The introduction is supposed to summarise that part of the article which follows the table of contents, see MOS:LEAD. As such, there is bound to be some duplication. "	0	0	0	0	0
Hi Jasper. I was about to suggest you talk to Master of Puppets since he's been working on it, but it looks like you already are, so I'll let him handle it.	0	0	0	0	0
45, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Arrogant & intransigent Hi, just thought you might like to know that (who you blocked) appears to be the same person as . Best wishes, Thanks. ∇∆∇∆ 13:	0	0	0	0	0
Thank you for your response. You have answered my questions perfectly.	0	0	0	0	0
"the article states that a wormhole would allow travel from one universe to another universe. but, since there is only one universe, how is that possible? i was under the impression that we live in ""the universe"" not ""a universe"". "	0	0	0	0	0
(EC with fisher queen.) Be that as it may, I have just removed your ability to disrupt by removing your ability to edit this talk page. Good day. .talk.contribs	0	0	0	0	1
" Hi. Our Azad article has a ref ""Urdu declared official language of Azad Kashmir"" (Pakistan Times, 21 August 2005), though the link is now dead. I don't remember where I got the Gilgit–Baltistan info, but we make the same claim in the infobox of that article. Are our articles wrong? — "	0	0	0	0	0
" template Is their any particular reason why ProveIt can view and edit but can't create it? (talk • contribs) "	0	0	0	0	0
Note about citations It would be very much appreciated if everyone did website citations in this format: {{cite web \| url= \| title= \| work= \| accessdate=}}, here is a guide in case you're not sure what goes in each section. Here is a list of all the citation templates if the reference isn't from a website. Thank you.	0	0	0	0	0
" Read the two sources given. They are very good biographies. Remember that attitudes to Hitler in the UK in the 1930 were complex and difficult to understand in hindsight, as indeed in different ways they were in the USA. Many people admired Hitler then, as we did not fully understand what he represented. The article has it pretty well clear. I tend to agree more with Jeal than Rosenthal, but I will check the latter as I have it here. (Discussion) "	0	0	0	0	0
" I am also bewildered and surprised by your comments of ""giving religious people a bad name."" I do not understand. How could a lack of desire to read these horror comics be offensive to other God-worshipping US citizens? I am sorry, but I am quite disgusted at your comments. How could you even understand the concept of faith? Are you religious? If so, I can tell you that reading Marvel Zombies may not comply with the rules of certain faiths...just please stop arguing...God..."	0	0	2	0	1
" No, you need to fuck off. talk "	0	0	0	0	1
Perhaps that's reasonable as a holding position, but there seem to me to be no good reasons not to create Toponymy in the Isle of Man and Toponymy in the Channel Islands as well.	0	0	0	0	0
" US emissions description is totally contentless now. The US section is total nihil. It is nothing more than a circular self-referencing system of cryptic abbreviations, without absolutely any kind of numerical data to back it up! I guess you do not understand? Well, based on the wikipedia info a US ""partial zero emissions vehicle"" could either be a bicycle (where the only emission is the cyclist's fart, to be rude) or a modified Hummer H1 SUV having an 1000 bhp Kenworth truck engine. There is no numerical info on the page to let us decide which is the case. Any person could create a system of circularly self-referencing acronyms and abbreviations for emissions categories out of thin air. Yet, it would still be zero information content. So either delete the US emissions section or add the numerical data (how many grams of CO2, NOx, SOx, unburnt fuel, particle charcoal matter are emitted per distance travelled) to back up those cryptic PZEV and alike codes with verifieable information. Look at the Euro-X standard descriptions. Each one is just a single sentence and it tells us the truth frankly. Weight and numbers, nothing else matters. Acronyms are PR bullshit and do not belong to an ecyclopaedia. It is a shame US people do not dare to face the polluting nature of their monster cars and try to hide the sad ""20mpg"" reality behind cryptic PZEV and similar abbreviations. In Europe 65mpg is reality now. Regards: Tamas Feher from Hungary E-mail: ""[email protected]"""	1	0	0	0	0
ANI thread This is a courtesy message to inform you that there is a current thread at WP:ANI concerning you:	0	0	0	0	0
You must be ignorant? The article is about the modern group, not the ancient one. The names Chaldean and Assyrian has only been used for a shorter time.	0	0	0	0	0
"::FF- In 1995 the Chinese government actually passed what they called a ""National Eugenics Law"" (some claim that is a mis-translation) that later was renamed the ""Maternal and Infant Health Law"" after an outcry. I gather that it was revoked recently. There are numerous references on the Internet to it. I agree that eugenics was viewed very differently prior to WWII. The two members that I mention were both from the 1960's, and one was a president. It is too easy to think of eugenics as belonging to the past or to another country. (In that same vein, it might be worth including a reference to 'stirpiculture' and the Oneida Community.) 00:33, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC) "	0	0	0	0	0
I've read it and what I'm presenting has nothing to do with a conflict of interest. I'm just presenting facts from outside reliable sources and am being attacked for it by people like niteshift36	0	0	0	0	1
ok hectorine, oh sorry hec.. whatever.	0	0	0	0	0
" And you are just about as rude; the insipid argument of ""300"" finding justification (If not outrightly an excuse) by being based on the ""Spartan"" point of view (Which is simplistic and trivialized to say the least) being inherently biased to the degree of promoting obvious fascism and racism and thus finding a market and an audience willing to pay to be entertained by such media reveals a level of idiocy where basically any untruth or case of defamation could be peddled by the same stupid rationale. I for one think the Greeks have had one of their great patriotic moments unjustly marketed to ignorant teenagers, like a cheap McDonald's burger. And worse, the Persians were outrightly denied their humanity. Let's for one second assume that the point-of-view indeed is ""Spartan"". So what? If the purported ""Spartan"" point-of-view is perverse, biased, untruthful, racist (If not outrighly inhuman considering a great deal of Persians in the film were depicted in a number of bizarre ways that would rather go under the sub-human category) and full of flaws... Why the fuck invest over 60 million dollars in a Hollywood production and try to find a market and an audience to bolster this bizarre concept? It just goes to show that profit is made on someone else's expense, while everything could legally be peddled as ""art"" or ""entertainment"" while making a buck out of it. Seems like the perfect backdoor in avoiding charges of libel and defamation. In fact, how about someone makes a collage of Zack Snyder and Frank Miller in photoshopped pictures performing fellatio and label it art? Libel, anyone? Defamation? If art is free, then certainly the wind may and must blow in all directions, just as much as a coin may have two sides. After all, through the argument of ""point of view"", anything could be distributed as art. And why stop there? A sequel entailing their mothers could be appropriate, considering that the new best friends Snyder and Miller have confirmed a sequel. "	2	1	0	0	1
Actually it does, nobody in the world would see salman khan or sbarukh khan has pashutn let alone janghair khan. You only add pashtuns from pakistan who are mostly athletes or singers but leave out actual important people. I will remove your edit since its agains't the rules to edit somebody else's work over it. Good day.	2	0	0	0	0
Seems a reasonable request reasonable to me.	0	0	0	0	0
Madness hey, yo! -)	0	0	0	0	0
Re sockpuppetry, I'd say it as unproved rather than false. I have said before (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Socialized_medicine#KBORER_.2FFREEDOMWARRIOR_-) , its not that difficult to run two IDs from two IP addresses even if the IP address points to different geographical locations. The main evidence for my claim came from the way the two editors behave and interact and in particular their edit breaks ... they both seem to take edit breaks from WP at the same time! The period before Christmas and the last two weeks have been more recent examples but the same pattern was observed throughout 2007. Re the contested edit. I'm not really bothered about the inclusion or otherwise of this edit. Its about a parallel issue. I did add it back because I know that if I didn't then someone else surely will. Its an interesting observation and in my view a true one. The discussion has decended into one of semantics about wealthy and industrialized that I'd rather not get into. The other editors are doing a good job battling that one out. I just have a gut feeling that the U.S. is in a different league economically from China though I would accept that this is changing fast. It is odd that China, socialist country, does not guarantee health care for all its citizens. It does for many, but not for all. As far as I recall it had more to do with the government being unwilling to pay doctors enough to persuade them to work in the rural areas. They can earn more in the wealthier cities. Urbanisation and industrial might is now the thing that is motoring the Chinese economy so failing to support rural areas may be deliberate government policy. I am not a China watcher so I can't really say.	0	0	0	0	0
YOU CAN ALL SUCK MY HAIRY BEANBAG YOU STUPID BASTARDS HES IN THE WRONG	0	0	0	0	2
Excellent searching, Tom, and thanks to whoever did the translation.	0	0	0	0	0
" OK, thanks, I'll be looking for that. Just in case, on the outside chance, that you haven't been made aware of the appeals (three) that have been lodged at Jimbo's page, I thought I'd give you a heads up, as there is likely pertinent info to be generated from that, aside from the tracing out the manifold concerns in the case raised there by me and the other appellants (the legalese is distasteful, but expedient). 連絡見学/迷惑 "	0	0	0	0	0
" HELLO DORK Hello dork, I consider you an intellectual coward and a fraud. You are truly a little man, with morals and values, that waver like a wet noddle. You may have some education, but your grammar and construct is not much better then mine, dork. Your mind is polluted and and you have no morality, except your own variable values and this is what really frightens me. You believe in ends justified the means and you have no limits unless it your way. this is what is shown, time and time again on your behavior on wikipeidia. BTW, Your a real joke on WR. Finely, the Sockspuppet thing on wiki, is a screaming joke. IPs are now dynamic and I have access to millions of them. I can write, make accounts, at will and have a drawer full of socks (in wikispeak). You are a pathetic little cultist, with out your own mind or morality. PS. to the wiki admins, I consider you to be scum due to the enabling the bullshit that soaks wikipeida and the perversion of the idea of ""encyclopedic"" to online role playing game, with out accountability to any reasonable athority. 76.203.19.83 "	0	0	0	0	2
" True. Caste/Community related stuff are really difficult to grasp immediately given the complex nature of Indian society. I can understand that you need more time to fully analyse the issue. Take your own time and I am always there to help you in case you need more references , we have agreed to maintain the original content till the discussion is over. An anon 122.164.191.109 have edited the article without any references and you have reverted it partially. Change it back to original content as of Nov13. By the way, any updates from your side ? You can take your own time but make sure to maintain the original content We need to maintain the original version till the dispute is resolved. Anonymous edits and partial reverting will only lead to more confusions. If people continue to edit, I propose to remove all caste names from the article till the dispute is resolved. Sorry, I thought that I had fully reverted the ip. Anyway, I've read all the English items, in some cases more than once.I can see that the Gounder community phrase is used in the sense of meaning the KV community, but that is only apparent if there is a ""hook"" in the article to give it some context. Eg: an article talks abour the KMK, you know that KMK = KV, and so when it then says ""Gounder community"" then the context makes it is obvious that they mean KV. I've not explained that particularly well, but short version: yes, in the examples Gounder community = KV. The problem is, that is not good enough. You cannot prove that the term is not used to refer to other groups of Gounder than the KV, nor could I find a really clear-cut example among the English language sources: all of them demanded that the reader already knew some background - eg: that KMK = KV party. Sure, you know that but someone born & bred in the UK or USA, Germany or Guatemala, Australia and Austria most probably will not. In that sense, you are engaging in synthesis, and we are not allowed to do that here. You said that the Tamil sources were important. Are they really going to resolve the issues that I raise? In particular, is even one of them going to explicitly say that the term is used either ""always"" or ""most frequently"" to refer to KVs? - , none of them will say, Gounder ""always"" refers to KVs because there are other communities too that are using the title. But you need to view from another angle. Why other communities (non-Kvs) are not referred as just Gounder Community ? Because, all the sections of Vettuvars, Vanniyars, Vokkaligas don't use Gounder title. Only some sections of those communities use the title and hence they cannot be generally referred as Gounder community. This gives the freedom to refer KVs as Gounder community. ""All of them demanded that the reader already knew some background - eg: that KMK = KV party"". This is not very difficult. We can attach this reference along with other references to prove that KMK or KMP = KV party. Anyway, if this not enough, here is another reference which says about Gounder community (taken from Deccan Chronicle). Persons belonging to Kongu Vellalar are mentioned as persons from Gounder Community.To prove that, Gounder community mentioned here refers to Kongu Vellalar, I have attached the proof here. which says Sengottaiyan is a Kongu Vellalar. No need to infer from KMP or KMK. This reference will directly establish that Gounder Community mentioned refers to Kongu Vellalar. [[User:Mahevenki\|Mahevenki	1	0	0	0	0
I believe that the photographs are, quite simply, unnecessary. I do not state this merely because I am partial to the view of some corpulent fellow's exhibitionism, but, they are simply excessive. Moreover, every image seems to benefit someone in some way, thus turning Wikipedia into a market. The one female image is of an amateur pornographic model (advertising herself), the other female of a contemporary 'artist's' work (advertising his work), and the male photograph of some perverse exhibitionist who, most certainly, adores polluting my screen with his phallus. For reasons such as this I deem the English wikipedia inordinately horrid. The sketches suffice this is unnecessary. The article was sufficient prior to this plague of pornography. But, 'Oh! Oh!', quoth the prepubescent wikipedian, ''Tis for the better of the encyclopedia!' How? The sketch shows a photograph of a man with a dick in his hand, as does the sketch. What the hell is the difference?	0	2	0	0	1
Evidently, not everyone agress with you.	0	0	0	0	0
" Not quite, TFD. My dispute with them is that I disagree that whether property is used for production or not is a legitimate factor at all in determining its rightful ownership, or that the ""means of production"" should be owned by anyone in particular in the monolithic sense used by socialists, or should be monopolized by anyone or any entity. Anyone should be free to build ""means of production"" and produce goods and services. That's the dispute."	0	0	0	0	0
" Also, seems intent on blocking anything or anyone associated with the hoaxer, so I'll let him know. sox "	0	0	0	0	0
Wow... Your just a fucking retard. Some of my edits are actually good source, however, you NYCS user fools want it your way.	0	0	0	2	1
" Montalban is quite right - I have supported the inclusion of opposition arguments in this article, particularly from an Orthodox perspective. And quite a body of material has been gathered that meets that objective. However, from a readability viewpoint, the article had become cumbersome to the point of unuseability. I have repeatedly requested Montalban to recognise this fact and to take measures to address it that would retain the arguments while improving the reading experience. It is for that reason that I have refrained from comment in this article for a long time now in the hope that this holy peace would bear fruit. I have been disappointed in this hope. With the creation of the other article, the imperative to have all the material in this particular article became less obvious. Given Montalban's obduracy, I finally lent my suport to a radical solution - the wholesale transport of sections to that other article. I'm prepared to see the ongoing presence of the core of the Orthodox argument in this article on the understanding that most of the heavy lifting should continue to be done by the ""See main"" to the other article. This assumes tat other editors will nt litter the remaining skeleton aerguments with ""references"" or ""says who"" flag requests. A more reasonable, less absolutist position by Montalban might have moved me to less radical surgury. "	0	0	0	0	0
lol wtf i aint vandalising seriously i tried not to hurt yo feelins tht time	0	0	0	0	1
" Yoga Thank you putting an end to the edit war. Goodfaith17 changed the title of the section on ""Talk"" page of the article from ""Changes by Goodfaith17: Reversal of material added by other editors and order of info-boxes"" to ""Changes by Samenewguy Reversal of material added by other editors and order of info-boxes"". Is this acceptable? I do not think he can replace his name in the title of this section by my name. I am not sure if he knows that these changes are tracked. There were changes made to this article yesterday by Lightocha, prestigiouzman, DMacks, Tbhotch and myself and these were discussed. Goodfaith17 comes in and reverts those without any discussion whatsoever. "	0	0	0	0	1
how do you like being a racist pig that votes republican? Have fun when your daughters grow up and they are retarded because funding for education is cut, they are fed a completely fast food diet, and when they are forced to worship the bible and not learn please stop reversing my edits on elizabeth murdoch. SHe is an evil b.i.t.i.ch that needs to seriously die because she is a threat to humanity. Please stop attacking me because i am a liberal and want the whole world to prosper, not just rich white people.	3	2	1	3	3
The line I put in about the paper's Web site is not a joke edit. It's factual information about the paper's Web site, including its address. Please try not to be so snotty in your response.	0	0	0	0	1
REDIRECT Talk:Augusta Victoria von Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen	0	0	0	0	0
The 3RR Rule fails. -	0	0	0	0	0
Oh, here's a note: I HATE YOU! Ringo casts Sine! Ekoro casts Imitation! A critical hit! Satan casts Ascension! A critical hit! Pikachu used Thunderbolt! Vic Viper used Thunderbeam! 96.229.35.133 fainted! 99.162.57.13	0	0	0	0	1
" You display your ignorance. The dim bulb in question was paranoid and he was stupid, the classic definitions without a shade of exaggeration. An accurate description isn't an insult, censor. Why you people feel the need to interfere when you don't understand is beyond me. When cletus wrote his stupid paranoid schlock viz ""I do not support the interjection of ""However, this accomplishment was short live."" That does not make sense. That sentence takes away from his great accomplishment. It infers that he did something wrong or something happened and he did not act. It has a negative connotation. What is the point of that sentence? There should be an entire section devoted to his accomplishment of paying off the national debt. Subtle propaganda The diction does not make sense and should be changed or removed."" That is paranoid and stupid. In fact if you're censoring me surely that garbage should also have been censored on the grounds that it is incoherent babble or whatever euphemism you censors use."	0	0	0	2	1
To quote Malcolm Reynolds: That's what makes us special. Peachy. 00:21, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
" Alright, so the story checks out for Bebebe, but what about Bababa and Bibibi?. Could 2/3 of the Hair Kingdom ""ancestors"" be any of them? And who or what is that flying saucer character in the middle of the second link? "	0	0	0	0	0
of killing all the jews	3	0	3	0	3
Got explanations from , no further action required.	0	0	0	0	0
Victim of injustice I am a bit concerned that this article in slanted. There is no mention or provision that he might have been a victim of hastily arranged injustice. The fact that he was brought to trial and convicted within 6 months of being arrested raises suspicion in my mind. There appears to be an untold story here - Mr Madoff certainly hasn't told his side yet. I think the Madoffs are getting railroaded. I think this article is heavily anti-semitic.	3	0	0	0	0
" Eric You're wasting your time with Eric, HillBilly. Eric's got form for this sort of thing - if he gets it into his head you're a wrong'un, no amount of evidence or explanations as to how you've never acted against him, had any crossed words with him, or how you actually even like him, will make any difference to him. Although possibly aggravated by his well renowned poor memory for the names of other editors he interacts with, as you saw when you corrected him about his claim you always start ANI threads, he just ignored you and instead upped the ante, referring to your ""obvious campaign of harassment"" of him. A clear personal attack if ever there was one. He's done it with this 'reformed' account many times already, he did it when he was socking on his 'roommate' account, and he did it when he was just plain old Malleus the b/tard. It's ironic this behaviour is the same sort of bullying he often accused admins of doing. And with no hint of irony at all from him, he accused you of trying to demean and patronise him, even though that's basically how he treats anyone on Wikipedia he doesn't agree with. Still, as you see, nobody cared, due to the fact he gets special protection from the likes of Drmies."	0	0	0	0	2
" Ships class Should it be just ""Trafalgar class submarine"" or ""Trafalgar-class submarine"" and tthus should there be a hyphen for all ships classes? "	0	0	0	0	0
Requested move :Hot Chicken sandwich → – per Manual of Style on titles Qwerty Binary (talk) Qwerty Binary (talk)	0	0	0	0	0
" Richard Frye]: ""Although the Tura in the Avestan Age were most probably Iranian, perhaps the memory of the struggles with aborigines played a part in the development of the epic. Later, of course, the Turks conveniently took the role of the great enemies of Iran. The extent of the influence of the Iranian epic is shown by the Turks who accepted it as their own history as well as that of Iran. The Turks were so much influenced by this cycle of stories that in the eleventh century AD we find the Qarakhanid dynasty in Central Asia calling itself the 'family of Afrasiyab' and so it is known in the Islamic history”(R.N. Frye, The Heritage of Persia: The pre-Islamic History of One of the World's Great Civilizations, World Publishing Company, New York, 1963. Pg 40-41)"" "	1	0	0	0	0
Yes this is from the first measurements of glial cells in the brain.	0	0	0	0	0
" Replied — (talk) "	0	0	0	0	0

" To the IP reverter Please do not continue to revert mine and others effort to improve this article without discussion. I have made several edits to the article which you seem to think can be treated as one. This is not the case. Contraventions of WP:Bio must, and I stress must, be reverted on sight. You simply cannot have potential libelous material in an article which you have now twice put back in. It simply cannot stay without a VERY strong reference. Truth has nothing to do with it. If it cant be verified it can't stay. Further, ""watched by billions"" isnt even worth a fact tag. It is simply untrue. Nothing has ever been watched by 2 billion people or more. It not true or sourced. ""Comebacking"" is not a word. Ray Leonard had 1 championship fight at middleweight. He is far more noted as a welterweight. WP:NPOV is requirement of all articles. Reverting all efforts to bring this article into line with policy is tantamount to disruption. If you continue I will seek protection for the page so only registered editors can edit it. "

0

1

I also just noticed: he simultaneously went after these same articles on the french Wikipedia, where he has ALSO been banned. See , for example. As I've said before, this editor simply refuses to give up, no matter how many warnings he is given.

0

":::* I'm not using jabs or insults of any kind. ""Greek-centric"" means ""centered on Greece or concerns relating thereto"". That's an accurate description of the view that things relating to Greece use words (in English) derived from Greek-language Hellas on the basis that Greeks themselves prefer this term. If this were a discussion about Germans wanting everything about Germany to use Deutsche in English too, that would be a German-centric concern (i.a. a concern centered on Germany, Germans, and their preferences). NB: I actually know Germans who insist that we should stop saying ""German"" and ""Germany"" (and that the Spanish should stop using Alemán), and everyone use ""Deutsche"" and ""Deutschland"", so, no, it is not a red herring fallacy at all, but a comparison chosen carefully (though not carefully enough; see a bit later). Your own counter however, is a straw man fallacy; no one said anything about transliterating vs. not transliterating, so the ""Ελλάς"" argument is a complete non sequitur. I do agree that Hellenic is an English word, and concede the point that the Deutsche comparison wasn't very apt after all; I was focused more on the situational than linguistic similarity when I chose it. A better example would be expecting our articles about Japan and the Japanese to use Nippon and Nipponese to better match the native name of the country; these are in fact words in English. It would actually make sense to do that than to do what's been proposed here, because ""Nipponese"" has no confusing alternative meaning, unlike ""Hellenic"" which commonly, probably commonly, refers to ancient Greek culture in English, not modern. —  ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ "

0

" That's nearly there. It should be ""| last = Peel| first = John"", and the ""authorlink"" gets filled in automatically. But if you're co-crediting Sheila, which I think is proper, it you need to add in ""last2 = Ravenscroft | first2 = Sheila | author2-link = "" after the above fields. Let me know if you get stuck, and congratulations for giving up law. Apart from the money, I haven't regretted it. '''''' (Talk) "

0

January 2010 (UTC) GoRight, you are not imagining this and you are well within your rights to point this out. I recommend you file a complaint. 18:58, 27

0

REDIRECT Talk:Stora mossen metro station

0

that the editor provided

0

YOU SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0

1

Re: Admin help needed Can't say I can recall seeing anything like this before. I find it curious a police force would be going through Wikipedia entries to look for someone they want to speak to... I'd leave things as they are and see if anything develops.

0

, I never go 1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4. Okay,

0

Brian, why don't you tell us about your arrest record? ]

0

You could have and should have done this from the beginning instead of acting like an abusive asshole (not to say to are an asshole because that would be an attack).

0

2

Mary Ambrose was not Robert Palmer's girlfriend at the time of his death, although they had been involved in a casual relationship. However, during the time period that Mary Ambrose was involved with Robert Palmer, she was involved with a number of men, even having two children, in 2001 and 2002, with men known to Robert Palmer. Mary Ambrose's son born in 2001 was fathered by Mick Carter, who was Robert Palmer's manager, until Palmer fired him in the second week of September. Unfortunately, since Mick Carter was the first person to discover that Robert Palmer had died, he took the opportunity to lie to the press on a number of points, including naming Mary Ambrose as Robert Palmer's girlfriend. Robert Palmer was no longer involved with Mary Ambrose before his death. His only contact with her at that point was trying to iron out a settlement agreement with Ambrose ensuring that she would not give interviews about him, or discuss him with the press. Mick Carter was not fond of Robert's true girlfriend, in fact he disliked her intently. Robert Palmer hadn't told many people about Mick Carter's firing, opting to complete his publicity appearances in Paris for Drive before doing so. Carter was fully aware of this, and took advantage of the situation. When it was discovered what he had done, and the surfeit of bogus and incorrect information that he had provided to the press worldwide, the information was invalidated due to his firing and credibility issues. Because of his close friendship with Mary Ambrose, he saw a money making opportunity for them in Robert Palmer's death. Carter even went so far as to stage a 'hoax' interview on Mary Ambrose's behalf, entitled Robert Palmer Was Addicted To My Love. The article appeared on the 28th of September, two days after the death of Palmer. The interview allegedly took place by phone, backed up by a signed release. When the interview was challenged by the family as being false, the interview was basically Robert Palmer emoting about Mary Ambrose, who his children knew he was no longer involved with in any vernacular at the time of his death, the article was revealed to be a hoax. At the time Robert Palmer was allegedly giving this interview by phone, he was in fact in attendance at a social function accompanied by three friends of his, who vouched he was with them the entire time the interview was allegedly taking place. As for the release, it was proven that Robert Palmer's signature was forged, and not a very good forgery at that. The article was to appear in three parts, but once the publishers realized that the article was a hoax, they cancelled the publication of the other two parts of the article and invalidated the one part that they had ran.

0

1

0

By the way, I am NOT the author of the Tebson article, I just came across it after it was tagged as a speedy deletion request.

0

As for Elvis's identification with the Jews, I have provided several reliable sources.

0

I am under attack! You guys are censoring any opinion that you do not agree with! And you have not responded to ANY of my proofs to my point of view.

0

1

REDIRECT User talk:Onorem/Archive 10

0

I thank you for cleaning that up when I look at that article, all I can see is the advertisement for Photoshop which is there and I am simply confused, disappointed and well somewhat curious the way you might be when driving your car past an accident on the road, that sick and sad and morbid kind of curious that makes it so I cannot seem to look elsewhere. carol Inktool! See above comment! I had no idea that the article called pathtool inktool! It becomes evident that the authors of the article are perhaps more familiar with Photoshop. There are days in which I am full of crap, but today I seem to be full of simile. I am female, so the POV is female. While reviewing that article, it was like watching the plumber work, perhaps where all I can see is that crack that is exposed right above the waistline, so much so that I did not notice that the plumber was wearing a skirt and that his slip was also showing. This is to thank you for having the stamina and a strength of good character enough so that you could look past the crack; I couldn't do this.... carol

0

2

0

"==Notability== I do not know, but it this bio really notable enough? Chat "

0

and defamatory remarks

0

1

" Is 4:2:1 a supermajority? What, did they have a thirty-second timeframe for this supposed consensus? Sheesh. What a pile of crap that one is! ☥ "

0

1

" Can you help me then? Durzatwink has repeatedly made spelling and grammar errors and when I tried fixing them, he reverted it to his version. contribsTALK "

0

Why does IGN list it as M then? I have no idea, IGN is usually very reliable, but XBOX is too....72.138.216.89

0

WHo hired Lanner and who the superiors are NOT relevant to the article on NCSY it AT MOST belongs on the Lanner page, and even there is isnt relevant.

0

" Zbigniew Brzezinski pronunciation Hi, I've been enjoying your Polish audio samples. When you get some time, could you do one for Zbigniew Brzezinski? There's no urgency to it but maybe you could add it to your ""eventually"" list. He is still on American TV occasionally, and I think the US interviewers mangle his name pretty badly. 67.117.145.9 "

0

Quick Note Do not add anymore info to the following sections: Introduction/C-Block/A-Block/Iguana Town & House of Blood/Z-Block/Wiggin Block/Playoffs Pomade Ring Cyber City Former Maruhage Empire Hair Kingdom These section will be split into seperate article as StrangerAtaru and I discussed before.

0

I have seen people who have done far worse things things then myslef, only to have a blind eye turned to them or a slap on the writs. You have also wnet aginst your only policy by imposing this ban with out even an arbs com decision, which only goes to show that thei is no structue that works here and the the real power rest in the admins who serve as judge jury and exctionicure, by keeping me blcok you have also reused to try to engage me in any kind of defence aginst the blatent violitaions of blocking that has been permited.

0

1

I understand that a Wikipedist must judge in between reliabilities. But I am sure it does not mean he/she should delete any info which does not fit to his/her image of the article or, it does not suit to his/her own believes regarding particular topic. Sorry, but it looks to me like that regarding what happening here. I am providing info, which nobody found yet may be just because nobody was looking for it. The fact that I am limited in English or in Wiki skills does not necessary mean the info provided by myself must be ignored. All I am asking is stop deleting it and work it in.

0

1

0

Rough Justice Why did you delete my page?

0

") Trumpet, I certainly will let someone whose posts mainly consist of inaccuracies, insults, ignoring/misrepresenting others views and ""zombies"" tell me how I should refert to this fringe group. I don't care whether you are a JMer, but the rest of your comment reveals that you have no idea about the historical craft. Since you have been explained about Docetism, there's no use in repeating why it and the JesusMyth claim are different. You will not listen. (smile back) 20:27, 21 March 2006 (UTC"

0

1

0

1

Glad you had a good time. I chickened out I'm afraid. With a bit more notice I might. -)

0

" Ozgoodelawyer Guy = 1D10T This ozgoodelawyer guy is a bloody idiot who think this is place for to write his own story book. I thin we should ban this guy. He think he know everythin about because he a ""lawyer"" hahaha. Get real man. We have right to edit this too. Everyday he change evrything he dont like. Sombady pelase ban this idiot. "

0

2

1

explain to me by your rules and anyone elses rule of how i vandalised your page.because i did not i posted just like you do. you say you are a ME but you are not acting like a professional at all. changing my words to your words and vandalizing yourself. i am starting to think your so called works aon this page is false and unsatation, with no backing. thank you. so yeah this title is wrong. anynmous..

0

1

Re: Hebrew Wikipedia If the Hebrew Wikipedia has relevant external links, just use them in the article, instead of linking to Hebrew Wikipedia. We don't self-reference. (Talk)

0

" Quagga Hi, i see that you're changing categories at the ""Quagga"" article. It might be more correct to add Extinct mammals of Africa instead of Extinct animals of Africa, but Extinct mammals of Africa is a non-existent category. I would suggest to either create that category, or leave it in the extinct animals category. "

0

PROD Restorations Lar, Thanks for helping restore challenged PRODs. It would be even more helpful if you could remove the PROD tag while userifying them, as old prods will jump to the top of the WP:PRODSUM list, and may result in erroneous redeletion, but certainly looks a bit messy. Cheers,

0

— | Talk 11:25, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

0

I note that you have thrice introduced the contested material on the QE page. Please keep in mind the 3 revert rule. I higly suggest a self-revert in order to show good faith.

0

October 2011 Please stop adding content with unreliable sources at 2012 AFC President's Cup. The revisions that you have made also do not apply to the 2012 AFC President's Cup.

0

" The Class action of Greek Cypriots has been on Cyprus dispute article since 28.03.2011. Now, after USA Federal Court rejected Greek Cypriots and decided that ""Greek Cypriots cannot claim that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots....Although the United States does not recognize it as a state, the TRNC purportedly operates as a democratic republic with a president, prime minister, legislature and judiciary...TRNC is not vulnerable to a lawsuit in Washington"", Hellens immediately removed it from Cyprus dispute page on 15.10.2014 by the 31.153.94.183. I strongly objected this kind of non-neutral stance till now, and definitely will object from now on. I hope that the number of fair people in WP will increase to take action against this blatant vandalisms. "

1

0

I try to tell people to just wait until it's confirmed on dojo, but they just ignore me. People like Sukecchi only point out the bad things I've done.

0

":::Mudblood is meant to be AS offensive as the n-word without actually being the n-word; so in a sense, you're correct. In the series, it's used the same way: as an inflamatory insult brought out by the hatred of someone's liniage. But simply beacause you see mudblood and think ""n-word"" says more about your personal perceptions than it does the intended use of the word. "

2

0

Scotland simply is not a country. If it is, show me your Scottish passport. Name a treaty to which Scotland is a party. Is Scotland a member of the United Nations? Sorry, but my comment was not racist.

0

Article title This lake is known as Arbuthnet Lake not Arbuthnot Lake. A quick Google search shows that the vast majority of quality sources highlight that the name of the lake is Arbuthnet Lake not Arbuthnot. Therefore per common name I propose to change the name back to Arbuthnet Lake.

0

" Daniel Vincent Kelley's Theory regarding this phrase First I want to point out that while it is CLAIMED in the article that Marie Antoinette was kind and noble and gracious of the peasants, NOTHING is cited to prove such. The one Antoinette quote that is offered to this end, smacks of sociopathology or her recognition that she would promote her OWN cause, by offering kindness to those who are proving themselves kind to her. There's nothing in the phrase to indicate that she was speaking of the whole of the French people, but it seems she was speaking about some particular people who had been particularly kind to her. Calculating psychopaths can be kind for this reason, so that they will enjoy camaraderie with their aids. So, this statement, that she felt she should be nice to the people who were being nice to her, certainly does NOT certify Marie Antoinette as kind hearted or noble. I suspect, that much as the phrase is thrown around today, it was probably thrown around by the clique of it's originator. They probably had a real laugh, suggesting things the peasants could eat, when they ran out of bread as happened under the leadership of every dictatorial monarchy. Here's how I imagine the phrase came to be said by Marie Antoinette is she heard her royal family, her mom and dad and step parents, maybe her grandparents, talking about what had been said in an age past, when the peasants ran out of food and started eying the national leadership as cause. Then, when she found herself in the situation, she used what was in her circle a cliche, that was widely unknown to the rest of the world. She probably didn't think much of saying it, she probably thought it would be received by her audience as cute and figured it would never get around, never become more widely known that she said it AND probably she hadn't really considered how callous it is when people are starving, to make light of it. So, my guess, is that, EXACTLY as the phrase is thrown around today for it being so pithy and the situation so often endured, peasants starving, Marie-Thérèse originated it, the phrase circulated amongst Royalty for 100 years, probably spoken of at dinner parties how pithy was Marie-Thérèse, how callous and witty and devilishly fun (from the sadistic royal perspective). So Marie-Thérèse originates it, Marie Antoinette's family speaks of it, tells the story. Marie Antoinette happens upon the same situation, bread shortage, she rehashes the phrase originated by Marie-Thérèse. Rouseau writing of it, attributing it to a Princess who he had not heard first hand say it, proves that the phrase was circulating in royal and educated circles. He says some earlier royal said it, presumably she said it to other royals and presumably Rouseau similarly heard it spoken by royals. So, obviously, if Marie-Thérèse said it, 100 years before Rouseau wrote it, obviously the phrase was conveyed by some royal story teller, who probably blathered on and on about all the corruption and hi-jinks those callous witty royals do, for love of reliving the old times and as ""lessons"" to the young royals on how to live. Marie Antoinette saying it, in royal company, would be like her saying, I'm on your side royal friends. It's basically a slightly witty way for Marie Antoinette to say she doesn't care how the peasants get through their hard times, how the royals deal with the peasants through those hard times, callous, is her intent and plan. It was a way of declaring her loyalty and making light of the situation. Many here have claimed that because Rouseau wrote it before Antoinette could possibly have said it, means that Antoinette never said it. That's OBVIOUSLY nonsense. She OBVIOUSLY didn't originate the phrase, credit Marie-Thérèse, but that wouldn't prevent her from spouting cliche as so many nim wits make habit."

0

And in your case, stop vandalising.

0

1

" The introduction is supposed to summarise that part of the article which follows the table of contents, see MOS:LEAD. As such, there is bound to be some duplication. "

0

Hi Jasper. I was about to suggest you talk to Master of Puppets since he's been working on it, but it looks like you already are, so I'll let him handle it.

0

45, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Arrogant & intransigent Hi, just thought you might like to know that (who you blocked) appears to be the same person as . Best wishes, Thanks. ∇∆∇∆ 13:

0

Thank you for your response. You have answered my questions perfectly.

0

"the article states that a wormhole would allow travel from one universe to another universe. but, since there is only one universe, how is that possible? i was under the impression that we live in ""the universe"" not ""a universe"". "

0

(EC with fisher queen.) Be that as it may, I have just removed your ability to disrupt by removing your ability to edit this talk page. Good day. .talk.contribs

0

1

" Hi. Our Azad article has a ref ""Urdu declared official language of Azad Kashmir"" (Pakistan Times, 21 August 2005), though the link is now dead. I don't remember where I got the Gilgit–Baltistan info, but we make the same claim in the infobox of that article. Are our articles wrong? — "

0

" template Is their any particular reason why ProveIt can view and edit but can't create it? (talk • contribs) "

0

Note about citations It would be very much appreciated if everyone did website citations in this format: {{cite web | url= | title= | work= | accessdate=}}, here is a guide in case you're not sure what goes in each section. Here is a list of all the citation templates if the reference isn't from a website. Thank you.

0

" Read the two sources given. They are very good biographies. Remember that attitudes to Hitler in the UK in the 1930 were complex and difficult to understand in hindsight, as indeed in different ways they were in the USA. Many people admired Hitler then, as we did not fully understand what he represented. The article has it pretty well clear. I tend to agree more with Jeal than Rosenthal, but I will check the latter as I have it here. (Discussion) "

0

" I am also bewildered and surprised by your comments of ""giving religious people a bad name."" I do not understand. How could a lack of desire to read these horror comics be offensive to other God-worshipping US citizens? I am sorry, but I am quite disgusted at your comments. How could you even understand the concept of faith? Are you religious? If so, I can tell you that reading Marvel Zombies may not comply with the rules of certain faiths...just please stop arguing...God..."

0

2

0

1

" No, you need to fuck off. talk "

0

1

Perhaps that's reasonable as a holding position, but there seem to me to be no good reasons not to create Toponymy in the Isle of Man and Toponymy in the Channel Islands as well.

0

" US emissions description is totally contentless now. The US section is total nihil. It is nothing more than a circular self-referencing system of cryptic abbreviations, without absolutely any kind of numerical data to back it up! I guess you do not understand? Well, based on the wikipedia info a US ""partial zero emissions vehicle"" could either be a bicycle (where the only emission is the cyclist's fart, to be rude) or a modified Hummer H1 SUV having an 1000 bhp Kenworth truck engine. There is no numerical info on the page to let us decide which is the case. Any person could create a system of circularly self-referencing acronyms and abbreviations for emissions categories out of thin air. Yet, it would still be zero information content. So either delete the US emissions section or add the numerical data (how many grams of CO2, NOx, SOx, unburnt fuel, particle charcoal matter are emitted per distance travelled) to back up those cryptic PZEV and alike codes with verifieable information. Look at the Euro-X standard descriptions. Each one is just a single sentence and it tells us the truth frankly. Weight and numbers, nothing else matters. Acronyms are PR bullshit and do not belong to an ecyclopaedia. It is a shame US people do not dare to face the polluting nature of their monster cars and try to hide the sad ""20mpg"" reality behind cryptic PZEV and similar abbreviations. In Europe 65mpg is reality now. Regards: Tamas Feher from Hungary E-mail: ""[email protected]"""

1

0

ANI thread This is a courtesy message to inform you that there is a current thread at WP:ANI concerning you:

0

You must be ignorant? The article is about the modern group, not the ancient one. The names Chaldean and Assyrian has only been used for a shorter time.

0

"::FF- In 1995 the Chinese government actually passed what they called a ""National Eugenics Law"" (some claim that is a mis-translation) that later was renamed the ""Maternal and Infant Health Law"" after an outcry. I gather that it was revoked recently. There are numerous references on the Internet to it. I agree that eugenics was viewed very differently prior to WWII. The two members that I mention were both from the 1960's, and one was a president. It is too easy to think of eugenics as belonging to the past or to another country. (In that same vein, it might be worth including a reference to 'stirpiculture' and the Oneida Community.) 00:33, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC) "

0

I've read it and what I'm presenting has nothing to do with a conflict of interest. I'm just presenting facts from outside reliable sources and am being attacked for it by people like niteshift36

0

1

ok hectorine, oh sorry hec.. whatever.

0

" And you are just about as rude; the insipid argument of ""300"" finding justification (If not outrightly an excuse) by being based on the ""Spartan"" point of view (Which is simplistic and trivialized to say the least) being inherently biased to the degree of promoting obvious fascism and racism and thus finding a market and an audience willing to pay to be entertained by such media reveals a level of idiocy where basically any untruth or case of defamation could be peddled by the same stupid rationale. I for one think the Greeks have had one of their great patriotic moments unjustly marketed to ignorant teenagers, like a cheap McDonald's burger. And worse, the Persians were outrightly denied their humanity. Let's for one second assume that the point-of-view indeed is ""Spartan"". So what? If the purported ""Spartan"" point-of-view is perverse, biased, untruthful, racist (If not outrighly inhuman considering a great deal of Persians in the film were depicted in a number of bizarre ways that would rather go under the sub-human category) and full of flaws... Why the fuck invest over 60 million dollars in a Hollywood production and try to find a market and an audience to bolster this bizarre concept? It just goes to show that profit is made on someone else's expense, while everything could legally be peddled as ""art"" or ""entertainment"" while making a buck out of it. Seems like the perfect backdoor in avoiding charges of libel and defamation. In fact, how about someone makes a collage of Zack Snyder and Frank Miller in photoshopped pictures performing fellatio and label it art? Libel, anyone? Defamation? If art is free, then certainly the wind may and must blow in all directions, just as much as a coin may have two sides. After all, through the argument of ""point of view"", anything could be distributed as art. And why stop there? A sequel entailing their mothers could be appropriate, considering that the new best friends Snyder and Miller have confirmed a sequel. "

2

1

0

1

Actually it does, nobody in the world would see salman khan or sbarukh khan has pashutn let alone janghair khan. You only add pashtuns from pakistan who are mostly athletes or singers but leave out actual important people. I will remove your edit since its agains't the rules to edit somebody else's work over it. Good day.

2

0

Seems a reasonable request reasonable to me.

0

Madness hey, yo! -)

0

Re sockpuppetry, I'd say it as unproved rather than false. I have said before (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Socialized_medicine#KBORER_.2FFREEDOMWARRIOR_-) , its not that difficult to run two IDs from two IP addresses even if the IP address points to different geographical locations. The main evidence for my claim came from the way the two editors behave and interact and in particular their edit breaks ... they both seem to take edit breaks from WP at the same time! The period before Christmas and the last two weeks have been more recent examples but the same pattern was observed throughout 2007. Re the contested edit. I'm not really bothered about the inclusion or otherwise of this edit. Its about a parallel issue. I did add it back because I know that if I didn't then someone else surely will. Its an interesting observation and in my view a true one. The discussion has decended into one of semantics about wealthy and industrialized that I'd rather not get into. The other editors are doing a good job battling that one out. I just have a gut feeling that the U.S. is in a different league economically from China though I would accept that this is changing fast. It is odd that China, socialist country, does not guarantee health care for all its citizens. It does for many, but not for all. As far as I recall it had more to do with the government being unwilling to pay doctors enough to persuade them to work in the rural areas. They can earn more in the wealthier cities. Urbanisation and industrial might is now the thing that is motoring the Chinese economy so failing to support rural areas may be deliberate government policy. I am not a China watcher so I can't really say.

0

YOU CAN ALL SUCK MY HAIRY BEANBAG YOU STUPID BASTARDS HES IN THE WRONG

0

2

Excellent searching, Tom, and thanks to whoever did the translation.

0

" OK, thanks, I'll be looking for that. Just in case, on the outside chance, that you haven't been made aware of the appeals (three) that have been lodged at Jimbo's page, I thought I'd give you a heads up, as there is likely pertinent info to be generated from that, aside from the tracing out the manifold concerns in the case raised there by me and the other appellants (the legalese is distasteful, but expedient). 連絡見学/迷惑 "

0

" HELLO DORK Hello dork, I consider you an intellectual coward and a fraud. You are truly a little man, with morals and values, that waver like a wet noddle. You may have some education, but your grammar and construct is not much better then mine, dork. Your mind is polluted and and you have no morality, except your own variable values and this is what really frightens me. You believe in ends justified the means and you have no limits unless it your way. this is what is shown, time and time again on your behavior on wikipeidia. BTW, Your a real joke on WR. Finely, the Sockspuppet thing on wiki, is a screaming joke. IPs are now dynamic and I have access to millions of them. I can write, make accounts, at will and have a drawer full of socks (in wikispeak). You are a pathetic little cultist, with out your own mind or morality. PS. to the wiki admins, I consider you to be scum due to the enabling the bullshit that soaks wikipeida and the perversion of the idea of ""encyclopedic"" to online role playing game, with out accountability to any reasonable athority. 76.203.19.83 "

0

2

" True. Caste/Community related stuff are really difficult to grasp immediately given the complex nature of Indian society. I can understand that you need more time to fully analyse the issue. Take your own time and I am always there to help you in case you need more references , we have agreed to maintain the original content till the discussion is over. An anon 122.164.191.109 have edited the article without any references and you have reverted it partially. Change it back to original content as of Nov13. By the way, any updates from your side ? You can take your own time but make sure to maintain the original content We need to maintain the original version till the dispute is resolved. Anonymous edits and partial reverting will only lead to more confusions. If people continue to edit, I propose to remove all caste names from the article till the dispute is resolved. Sorry, I thought that I had fully reverted the ip. Anyway, I've read all the English items, in some cases more than once.I can see that the Gounder community phrase is used in the sense of meaning the KV community, but that is only apparent if there is a ""hook"" in the article to give it some context. Eg: an article talks abour the KMK, you know that KMK = KV, and so when it then says ""Gounder community"" then the context makes it is obvious that they mean KV. I've not explained that particularly well, but short version: yes, in the examples Gounder community = KV. The problem is, that is not good enough. You cannot prove that the term is not used to refer to other groups of Gounder than the KV, nor could I find a really clear-cut example among the English language sources: all of them demanded that the reader already knew some background - eg: that KMK = KV party. Sure, you know that but someone born & bred in the UK or USA, Germany or Guatemala, Australia and Austria most probably will not. In that sense, you are engaging in synthesis, and we are not allowed to do that here. You said that the Tamil sources were important. Are they really going to resolve the issues that I raise? In particular, is even one of them going to explicitly say that the term is used either ""always"" or ""most frequently"" to refer to KVs? - , none of them will say, Gounder ""always"" refers to KVs because there are other communities too that are using the title. But you need to view from another angle. Why other communities (non-Kvs) are not referred as just Gounder Community ? Because, all the sections of Vettuvars, Vanniyars, Vokkaligas don't use Gounder title. Only some sections of those communities use the title and hence they cannot be generally referred as Gounder community. This gives the freedom to refer KVs as Gounder community. ""All of them demanded that the reader already knew some background - eg: that KMK = KV party"". This is not very difficult. We can attach this reference along with other references to prove that KMK or KMP = KV party. Anyway, if this not enough, here is another reference which says about Gounder community (taken from Deccan Chronicle). Persons belonging to Kongu Vellalar are mentioned as persons from Gounder Community.To prove that, Gounder community mentioned here refers to Kongu Vellalar, I have attached the proof here. which says Sengottaiyan is a Kongu Vellalar. No need to infer from KMP or KMK. This reference will directly establish that Gounder Community mentioned refers to Kongu Vellalar. [[User:Mahevenki|Mahevenki

1

0

I believe that the photographs are, quite simply, unnecessary. I do not state this merely because I am partial to the view of some corpulent fellow's exhibitionism, but, they are simply excessive. Moreover, every image seems to benefit someone in some way, thus turning Wikipedia into a market. The one female image is of an amateur pornographic model (advertising herself), the other female of a contemporary 'artist's' work (advertising his work), and the male photograph of some perverse exhibitionist who, most certainly, adores polluting my screen with his phallus. For reasons such as this I deem the English wikipedia inordinately horrid. The sketches suffice this is unnecessary. The article was sufficient prior to this plague of pornography. But, 'Oh! Oh!', quoth the prepubescent wikipedian, ''Tis for the better of the encyclopedia!' How? The sketch shows a photograph of a man with a dick in his hand, as does the sketch. What the hell is the difference?

0

2

0

1

Evidently, not everyone agress with you.

0

" Not quite, TFD. My dispute with them is that I disagree that whether property is used for production or not is a legitimate factor at all in determining its rightful ownership, or that the ""means of production"" should be owned by anyone in particular in the monolithic sense used by socialists, or should be monopolized by anyone or any entity. Anyone should be free to build ""means of production"" and produce goods and services. That's the dispute."

0

" Also, seems intent on blocking anything or anyone associated with the hoaxer, so I'll let him know. sox "

0

Wow... Your just a fucking retard. Some of my edits are actually good source, however, you NYCS user fools want it your way.

0

2

1

" Montalban is quite right - I have supported the inclusion of opposition arguments in this article, particularly from an Orthodox perspective. And quite a body of material has been gathered that meets that objective. However, from a readability viewpoint, the article had become cumbersome to the point of unuseability. I have repeatedly requested Montalban to recognise this fact and to take measures to address it that would retain the arguments while improving the reading experience. It is for that reason that I have refrained from comment in this article for a long time now in the hope that this holy peace would bear fruit. I have been disappointed in this hope. With the creation of the other article, the imperative to have all the material in this particular article became less obvious. Given Montalban's obduracy, I finally lent my suport to a radical solution - the wholesale transport of sections to that other article. I'm prepared to see the ongoing presence of the core of the Orthodox argument in this article on the understanding that most of the heavy lifting should continue to be done by the ""See main"" to the other article. This assumes tat other editors will nt litter the remaining skeleton aerguments with ""references"" or ""says who"" flag requests. A more reasonable, less absolutist position by Montalban might have moved me to less radical surgury. "

0

lol wtf i aint vandalising seriously i tried not to hurt yo feelins tht time

0

1

" Yoga Thank you putting an end to the edit war. Goodfaith17 changed the title of the section on ""Talk"" page of the article from ""Changes by Goodfaith17: Reversal of material added by other editors and order of info-boxes"" to ""Changes by Samenewguy Reversal of material added by other editors and order of info-boxes"". Is this acceptable? I do not think he can replace his name in the title of this section by my name. I am not sure if he knows that these changes are tracked. There were changes made to this article yesterday by Lightocha, prestigiouzman, DMacks, Tbhotch and myself and these were discussed. Goodfaith17 comes in and reverts those without any discussion whatsoever. "

0

1

how do you like being a racist pig that votes republican? Have fun when your daughters grow up and they are retarded because funding for education is cut, they are fed a completely fast food diet, and when they are forced to worship the bible and not learn please stop reversing my edits on elizabeth murdoch. SHe is an evil b.i.t.i.ch that needs to seriously die because she is a threat to humanity. Please stop attacking me because i am a liberal and want the whole world to prosper, not just rich white people.

3

2

1

3

The line I put in about the paper's Web site is not a joke edit. It's factual information about the paper's Web site, including its address. Please try not to be so snotty in your response.

0

1

REDIRECT Talk:Augusta Victoria von Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen

0

The 3RR Rule fails. -

0

Oh, here's a note: I HATE YOU! Ringo casts Sine! Ekoro casts Imitation! A critical hit! Satan casts Ascension! A critical hit! Pikachu used Thunderbolt! Vic Viper used Thunderbeam! 96.229.35.133 fainted! 99.162.57.13

0

1

" You display your ignorance. The dim bulb in question was paranoid and he was stupid, the classic definitions without a shade of exaggeration. An accurate description isn't an insult, censor. Why you people feel the need to interfere when you don't understand is beyond me. When cletus wrote his stupid paranoid schlock viz ""I do not support the interjection of ""However, this accomplishment was short live."" That does not make sense. That sentence takes away from his great accomplishment. It infers that he did something wrong or something happened and he did not act. It has a negative connotation. What is the point of that sentence? There should be an entire section devoted to his accomplishment of paying off the national debt. Subtle propaganda The diction does not make sense and should be changed or removed."" That is paranoid and stupid. In fact if you're censoring me surely that garbage should also have been censored on the grounds that it is incoherent babble or whatever euphemism you censors use."

0

2

1

To quote Malcolm Reynolds: That's what makes us special. Peachy. 00:21, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

0

" Alright, so the story checks out for Bebebe, but what about Bababa and Bibibi?. Could 2/3 of the Hair Kingdom ""ancestors"" be any of them? And who or what is that flying saucer character in the middle of the second link? "

0

of killing all the jews

3

0

3

0

3

Got explanations from , no further action required.

0

Victim of injustice I am a bit concerned that this article in slanted. There is no mention or provision that he might have been a victim of hastily arranged injustice. The fact that he was brought to trial and convicted within 6 months of being arrested raises suspicion in my mind. There appears to be an untold story here - Mr Madoff certainly hasn't told his side yet. I think the Madoffs are getting railroaded. I think this article is heavily anti-semitic.

3

0

" Eric You're wasting your time with Eric, HillBilly. Eric's got form for this sort of thing - if he gets it into his head you're a wrong'un, no amount of evidence or explanations as to how you've never acted against him, had any crossed words with him, or how you actually even like him, will make any difference to him. Although possibly aggravated by his well renowned poor memory for the names of other editors he interacts with, as you saw when you corrected him about his claim you always start ANI threads, he just ignored you and instead upped the ante, referring to your ""obvious campaign of harassment"" of him. A clear personal attack if ever there was one. He's done it with this 'reformed' account many times already, he did it when he was socking on his 'roommate' account, and he did it when he was just plain old Malleus the b/tard. It's ironic this behaviour is the same sort of bullying he often accused admins of doing. And with no hint of irony at all from him, he accused you of trying to demean and patronise him, even though that's basically how he treats anyone on Wikipedia he doesn't agree with. Still, as you see, nobody cared, due to the fact he gets special protection from the likes of Drmies."

0

2

" Ships class Should it be just ""Trafalgar class submarine"" or ""Trafalgar-class submarine"" and tthus should there be a hyphen for all ships classes? "

0

Requested move :Hot Chicken sandwich → – per Manual of Style on titles Qwerty Binary (talk) Qwerty Binary (talk)

0

" Richard Frye]: ""Although the Tura in the Avestan Age were most probably Iranian, perhaps the memory of the struggles with aborigines played a part in the development of the epic. Later, of course, the Turks conveniently took the role of the great enemies of Iran. The extent of the influence of the Iranian epic is shown by the Turks who accepted it as their own history as well as that of Iran. The Turks were so much influenced by this cycle of stories that in the eleventh century AD we find the Qarakhanid dynasty in Central Asia calling itself the 'family of Afrasiyab' and so it is known in the Islamic history”(R.N. Frye, The Heritage of Persia: The pre-Islamic History of One of the World's Great Civilizations, World Publishing Company, New York, 1963. Pg 40-41)"" "

1

0

Yes this is from the first measurements of glial cells in the brain.

0

" Replied — (talk) "

0