tcapelle/kaggle-toxic-annotated-filtered · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 6 5k	racial_origin int64 0 3	gender_sex int64 0 3	religion int64 0 3	ability int64 0 3	violence int64 0 3
sir these are the sources. In which it is clearly stated that Mughals were defeated and retreated in the second battle of Anandpur Johar, Surinder Singh (1998). Holy Sikh shrines. New Delhi: M D Publications. p. 46. ISBN 978-81-7533-073-3. OCLC 44703461. 3. Singh, Bhagat Lakshman (1995). Short Sketch of the Life and Work of Guru Govind Singh, The Tenth and Last Guru. Laurier Books Ltd. /AES. p. 96. ISBN 978-81-206-0576-3. OCLC 55854929. 4. Singh, Prithi Pal (2007). The History of Sikh Gurus. Lotus Books. p. 146. ISBN 978-81-8382-075-2. 5. Singh, Dalip (1992). Guru Gobind Singh and Khalsa Discipline. Amritsar: Singh Bros. p. 256. ISBN 978-81-7205-071-9. OCLC 28583123.	0	0	0	0	0
And you can join him too and stfu.	0	0	0	0	1
" Adam Rose John Cena lover Why do you defend PG wrestling when you don't even know what the fuck WWE is about? Why defend a phony wrestler like John Cena and a faggot ass queer who likes to have a fist in his anus like Adam Rose? "	0	3	0	0	1
Does this organization define or indentify itself as part of 'truth movement'? What is another 'truther group', does such construct exist outside of Wikipedia mindset?	0	0	0	0	0
, the military command for both Iraq and Afghanistan area of operations	0	0	0	0	0
Tiderolls, I wish to report Abhishek191288 for repeatedly undoing my images & constantly threatening me with blocking. I request that as his editing is targetive, irrelevant & self glorifying he be blocked from any editing on articles of Indian Railways.	1	0	0	0	1
Patrick Drake??? When did Carly ever have a romance with Patrick Drake?? Ive been watching the show since 04 and Carly is one of my fav characters. The only doctors I remember her ever being involved with was Dr. Tony Jones and a very, very, very brief flirtation with Dr. Steven Lars Webber. Please clarify and fix!	0	0	0	0	0
I just posted a link at the front page of the article for the Tom Hanks Family Tree that proves he has Portuguese ancestry. Also, another site I came across also proves that Tom Hanks and Abraham Lincoln, are relatives, some even debate that Abraham Lincoln comes from Portuguese immigrant lineage...as well as Al Gore. I haven't found any sources YET that proves that both Lincoln and Gore are from Portuguese immigrant lineage.	0	0	0	0	0
Your nonsense Shouldn't you be edit-warring on some Israeli-Palestinian article like you usually do to push your Arabist pov instead of trolling on my talk page? Do not disrupt my talk page again.	2	0	0	0	1
p.s. Wow, these two characters: Jiang and Changlc are already all over me. Who are these guys and how can I get them to stop reverting my changes?	0	0	0	0	0
has no life or friends	0	0	0	1	0
You are a cocksucking faggot D	0	3	0	0	2
A pacemaker like implantable device designed by company_name to electrically activate the baroreflex would probably be OK in the first sentence. By the way, none of this guarantees it will not be removed by other editors, but it makes it more likely that it will not be removed. (talk)	0	0	0	0	0
its abilities are √ dumbshit...	0	0	0	2	0
" February 2009 (UTC) I think it's fine as it is, considering that Blitz only brought up the discussion on cameos when talking about Hill. Is there anything specific that you'd prefer to see here? — 03:18, 8"	0	0	0	0	0
" Shit, man....... Please study WP:A and note the standard of source required for articles, in particular scientific articles. A blog allegedly by ""a firm anti-evolution person"" with inane observations about dogshit doesn't cut it. The best part is the second comment, while your comment (No. 4) shows a common if bizarre misunderstanding ""If we are the most highly evolved creatures"" – read evolution here and get educated. Ta for the laff, .. , talk "	0	0	0	0	1
I am curious who is left that is outside this group who have edited together. I mean isn't that what canvasing Votestacking is - bringing in familiar people for a headcount. I haven't edited with any other editor here (outside of this article). Is there anyone else here who is in that position? Regarding the Altercations sections, even without the naming, the current version is inaccurate. The lawsuit was never filed. The settlement was for a potential one. That should be non controversial. I'm sure no one wants an error to remain.	0	0	0	0	0
Sadly, it's true.- .talk.stalk. mail.csb 21:57, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
Since she uses that word, I'm free to use it too.	0	1	0	0	0
BLP Please be cautious about BLP violations. You've added false information to Samuel Estreicher twice now. This is not acceptable. In response to your post on my talk page: please know that you should not add false information to BLPs. Both the edits you made are not supported by the cite and appear to be patently false. A campaign donation from 2008 sourced only to a public record of the donation itself also does not belong in the opening paragraphs. No need to resort to attacking me when you were in the wrong. You messed up. I pointed out where you were wrong. Please don't do it again. There's nothing bad faith about me letting you know that you shouldn't be violating core policies. I'm sorry if it's upsetting to have your errors pointed out, but it's important that you understand that you can't add false information or improperly sourced information, or other distorted information to biographical articles of living people. Thanks.	0	0	0	0	1
And he also uses that sentence as a reason for not restoring the previous section.	0	0	0	0	0
Oh go away Artkos. Go and make a total pest of yourself elsewhere not where others are trying to do stuff.	0	0	0	0	1
Never the less, at the end of the day you were still blocked for violating a discretionary sanction, despite your assertion of vague formulations of the original 1RR article remedy which was imposed on 18 January 2010. As such you should be logged like the others who have similarly violated the 1RR restriction. As much as I don't like this blanket restriction on past violators (and I include myself here), it should be applied equally without exception.	0	0	0	0	0
" Discussion habits food USA American eating habits owe a great deal to that of their British culinary roots with some variations. Although American lands could grow newer vegetables England could not, most colonists would not eat these new foods until accepted by Europeans. The source here is to a broken link. The link is to a page where I can buy a book. Not an actual source, there's no proof and all that this quote is in the book. I have researched this independently on my own and have not found anything of the sort related to this material. This is an opinionated argument and not a fact you can easily look up. The source does not share this quote or fact; it isn't in it from any link posted and is in fact a broken source and a link that does not lead to the information written. I recommend deleting this post until the user or whoever has written it can find identifiable information by a credible source leading to the statement. It does not further the page or help anyone understand anything about this topic nor is credible or have any identifiable backing of any kind."	0	0	0	0	0
Age of Carlsbad Caverns I have attempted to answer your question at Talk:Carlsbad Caverns National Park.	0	0	0	0	0
YOURE A FAG. AND IF YOU WRITE ANYTHING ELSE ON MY TALK PAGE IN RESPONSE TO THIS, THAT IS HOW YOU WILL ADMIT BEING A FAG.	0	3	0	0	1
This is the start of JamCad605's User Talk.	0	0	0	0	0
I reported it on the appropriate sanctions noticeboard, but in the meantime, are we just supposed to leave up specious false insinuations about someone because an IP doesn't care if they get 3RR blocked?	0	0	0	0	1
is sara Palin email hack article supposed to be deleted? I looked on the sara palin email hack talk page and it said that the article had be nominated for deletion. Is seems that the results are to delete. Why does it still exist ?	0	0	0	0	0
Thank you for this. I have read the articles and found them useful. I simply don't understand however how The Kate Kennedy Club does not fulfil the criteria of these two issues however. Indeed one only has to search 'Kate Kennedy Club' in either Google Books or simply Google to see the number of accounts of the club's purpose and aims in published books, national newspapers and online. I would be more than happy to list the names of the books/ the links to the articles in national press which reference the club, if that is necessary? Best (talk	0	0	0	0	0
Summaries off Deltasim Deltasim needs to keep seeing Blinky Bill Season 3. I think it''ll be on ABC2 next week so ask Deltasim to tape each episode to his Tivo. Hope he finds more eps soon. Unregistered Contributor 17:48, June 16, 2011 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
" I don't think the Kirby anime is canonical. (talk) 21:24, August 27, 2005 (UTC)"	0	0	0	0	0
Re: Many apologies Ok. Play nice now. (Talk)	0	0	0	0	0
" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:Daemonic Kangaroomy talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! "	0	0	0	0	0
" Apology You're right. I got a message from GMaxwell, construed it as a threat, and got frustrated and let that out through my edit summaries. I know I have a temper, but that's not an excuse. If i've lost you after my inability to control that rage against the feeling of powerlessness that I and so many others(recently Guanaco has been feeling like this from hearing him in IRC). I can't think of anything else to say right now. If the system can be reformed from the inside, I will follow you, but I have unfortunately lost faith to any real reforms happening through established channels, and i'm going to be timid in that aspect. I'll say more later when i'm better able, but please know that whether your views of me are negative or positive, my views of you are mostly positive, despite our disagreements. afist '''''' "	0	0	0	0	0
" Of course I understand the process - it is so that do nothing non-entities like you have a reason to exist - perhaps you would like to lecture me on this being a ""volunteer project"". Where is the blocking process that protects me ?"	0	0	0	2	1
" ""The war is over. And you lost."" Not quite, Your Arrogance. I'm leaving this vile, post-modernist sewer. Wikipedia will be cleansed, though not by me: it will be many, many others. "	0	0	0	0	1
" ** YOU! PTANG INA KA! HAYOP KA! WALA SA AKING INTENSYON NA SIRAAN ANG GMA NOR ""BABUYIN"" ANG WIKIPEDIA, KAYA KUNG MERON MAN DAPAT TUMIGIL, IKAW YUN, OK, WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO TELL ME WHAT TO DO, SURE YOU MAY HAVE A ""RANK"" HERE AT WIKIPEDIA, BUT THAT GIVES YOU NO RIGHT, I THOUGHT WIKIPEDIA WAS A PLACE WHERE PEOPLE CAN FREELY SHARE WHAT THEY KNOW AND HAVE REFERENCES, RESOURCES TO BACK IT UP, BUT NO YOU VIEW IT A DIFFERENT WAY, WHERE IT'S ALWAYS GOTTA BE ABOUT YOU AND YOU TAKING THE F*ING BLAME!!! SH KA! HAYOP! "	0	0	0	0	3
" Rollback Tools Have Disappeared Hello Lupin. Recently something strange has developed with the script for me. I have all the functionalities of the tool that normally would be there, but now I am missing all the rollback links. I am using IE 7 as a browser just I had in the past. Is this a recent bug with the tool or is my browser bugging with the script? (talk) "	0	0	0	0	0
My dear colleagues-I cannot understand your umbrage. I was reading your sources, and I came to understand that the passage that I was reading was awfully familiar-in fact, the Wikipedia material was a word for word paraphrase of the source with the tenses of verbs changed. I know you will agree with me that it is better to quote the source directly than to paraphrase. Since so I replaced the paraphrase with a quote. Do you object to the quote of your source? I did not choose him I merely followed the footnotes. In following the other footnote, I noticed it had a contrasting view of the origin of the Eucharist and knowing that you would use it as a source I wanted to include it. If you have changes to make, make them. BRD if he says you can't revert as a piece called once merely because you don't like them	0	0	0	0	0
See here: Talk:The_Bell_Curve. In the upper toolbar, there's a button for 'new section'.	0	0	0	0	0
I've removed the information entirely as it's irrelevant trivia.	0	0	0	0	0
" Speedy deletion of Plysh media A tag has been placed on Plysh media, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. "	0	0	0	0	0
in response to There is a persistent meme in this article and others that models were introduced in response to some model from another company. That may be possible, but the lead time for a set of wheels and some pinstripes is 12 months, any real change is 2 years, and a fundamental change is more like 4 years. So this game of pingpong beloved of wiki editors really doesn't exist. Simple question, if pingpong worked, why did it take Toyota so long to bring the 4wd Kluger out?	0	0	0	0	0
and perpetuating beliefs of those that just don't want to see said religious words; harassment	0	0	2	0	1
" Thank you! I always appreciate a good laugh. talk "	0	0	0	0	0
Mind Readers Software Mind Readers Software is a Prime Minister Web Design and Development company in Chennai with global surrender machine that houses a team of technical, creative and avocation experts who purchase best practices, proven expertise and available means to set free the best in Internet products services company. We point of convergence on all Web-based solutions from subtle and unfolding of Static, Dynamic and liquid Website to portals, to incorporated presentations. Being based in Chennai at India, the relating to traffic principal of India, we procure potent Website Design and Development. At Mind Readers Software we believe in perfectness. This has made us one of the leading Website Design and Development Company in Chennai. For us a website is just not only a rise of intelligence, but also a powerful marketing tool for your business.	0	0	0	0	0
" Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you want to get involved, but I'm afraid there's a problem with the article you created, Chobots. It did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Don't feel too badly; lots of people have a little trouble when creating their first article. You might find it useful to read Your First Article for some good advice about starting to create articles on Wikipedia. Two important rules of thumb are: Avoid writing about yourself, your business, your family and friends, or your web page, and avoid writing about anything that hasn't been written about in reliable sources like books, newspapers, and magazines. Anyway, don't be discouraged. I've deleted the article you created, and feel free to ask me if you have any more questions. If I've made a mistake, and this article really is about a subject that meets the notability criteria, then please let me know my leaving me a message and links to at least three newspaper articles, magazine articles, or books that have been written about the subject, and I'll be glad to undelete it, and even add the sources so no other patroller makes the same mistake. - (talk · contribs) "	0	0	0	0	0
Allow me to reiterate the above. He is widely known by the initial, so that's the title we use. If you disagree with that, you can raise the issue on the article talk page. 23:16, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
Hey! Thanks for your comment! I am new to Wiki and i will try to improve myself.	0	0	0	0	0
Support Joe - thanks for the RFA support. You wouldn't believe how difficult it is to update wikipedia like this, without opposable thumbs. I'll keep working on it, evolution is sloooow.	0	0	0	1	0
" Deletion Review for Rocktronica An editor has asked for a deletion review of Rocktronica. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. '''''' talk ¤ I am not the requester, just procedurally listed for them on the correct logpage and in correct format. '''''' talk ¤ Deletion Review for Synth rock An editor has asked for a deletion review of Synth rock. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. '''''' talk ¤ I am not the requester, just procedurally listed for them on the correct logpage and in correct format. '''''' talk ¤ "	0	0	0	0	0
It's very much like the storyline of the Impossible Planet/Satan Pit episodes. A craft/planet is falling into something that would destroy it at the will of a mysterious creature. In IP/SP, it's a Satan-like creature, in 42 it's a star. I get the feeling that Chris Chibnall just ripped off the previously mentioned two-part story, but just compressed it into a single episode. Don't both stories take place in the 42nd century/millennium?	0	0	0	0	0
3RR You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.	0	0	0	0	0
Did so on Aug 21, there' a backlog on the page, apparently, that's where nothing has been happening. Since I posted there, he still reverted his favorite photo into the Equestrianism article since. It's getting very tiresome. Can anyone just block him from editing equestrianism? It seems to be his favorite prank and the various vandal bots don't seem to catch that one as fast as a lot of the others? (or can we dump the photo? It really is more porn than art...) I'm still fairly new to wikipedia and don't know how all the tools can be used. I also don't monitor constantly... help!	0	0	0	0	1
"Semantic complaint=== The headings of this discussion are potentially misleading. I eventually figured out we're talking about ""cover"" in the sense of ""treat,"" ""include,"" or ""write about"". However, cover can also be taken to mean ""suppress,"" ""bury,"" or ""censor"". That is, those who might be favor of not covering Connolley's desysop in his WP bio might themselves be accused (wrongfully or otherwise) of covering they desysop. Just a thought. ==="	0	0	0	0	0
" Male graduates before 1969 I've added mention to the 'trivia' section regarding men who matriculated at vassar immediately after world war II on the GI bill. I suppose this could be classified as 'original research', not sure. My father was in that first graduating class that included men (eleven of them). A scan of the relevant portion of the program from the graduation ceremonies can be found here . again, if this constitutes original research, i guess it can be pulled, though it is a rather fascinating bit of history. Bias There are many abundantly clear examples of bias in this article: “Vassar is often praised for its beautiful campus, a 1000 acre (4 km?) lot of land marked by period and modern buildings that is also an arboretum; since that time, it has maintained its reputation as one of America's outstanding liberal arts colleges, and is especially noted for its tolerant social atmosphere; the college is a member of the ""Little Ivies,"" an unaffiliated group of elite northeastern liberal arts colleges; Vassar is a leader in producing doctoral candidates; Vassar students are well known for their individuality, creativity, and open-mindedness; many beautiful old brick buildings are scattered throughout the bucolic campus, but there are also several modern and contemporary structures worth noting."" Did this come straight from the College’s website? Bias ? I disagree with the above allegation of bias in the article. I found no similarity between the Vassar Web site and the article. The information in question - the attractiveness of the campus - seems fairly innocuous and is fairly similar to the type of information in Wikipedia articles about other liberal arts colleges and several universities. The article reads like synopsis of commercially available background information in colleges guide books. While I would have written the main paragraph differently, I hardly think this qualifies as biased, and without some criteria to differentiate this page from other pages on other schools, I believe the objection should be removed from this page. The article violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy, clearly. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, a place to find innformation, not a forum for opinions. If you are unwilling to make changes, then I will go ahead and make them myself. Also, you should leave you name when commenting. Also, I realize that the article is not up to date and violates Wikipedia's policy against personal research (ie, students spend time doing ceratin activities on a certain lawn). I do agree that much of the information on this page is somewhat biased. And the architectural info came from me, not the college's website - so, my apologies for lack of ""neutrality"" there. However, if you edit the page to remove said ""bias"", please re-read your edits before saving the page. Simply removing phrases and not doing a little copyedit makes the page read poorly. I have made some minor edits just so that it reads a little cleaner, hopefully not restoring anything that you feel is biased. I think the bigger issue is that this page has become a series of lists (academic majors, famous alums, residence halls) with little encyclopedic content and is an embarrasment compared to other articles about comparable schools. Someone please help to fix this article! "	0	1	0	0	0
" I'm still researching him and working on the article. So far all I've found is that he was born in England and emigrated to New York City with his family when he was a child. I have found no mention of his having become an American citizen. It's a moot point . . . I'm adding enough material that the stub tags no longer will be necessary. Thanks for your input! '''''' (talk • contrib) "	0	0	0	0	0
A discussion about potential changes to the biography section can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Amir_Abbas_Fakhravar. Proposals have been given for change. Please provide your opinion so that we can reach some consensus.	0	0	0	0	0
" In the campaign paragraph, it breaks up the flow; however, since it applies to the topics discussed in the civilizations (which are playable), the sentence demonstrates that the Japanese can be fought, but they aren't included as a civilization. — r "	0	0	0	0	0
sexy time with old saggy grandmas	0	2	0	0	0
Please do so. It is better to clarify matters before inserting material, as we want to avoid confusing readers if possible.	0	0	0	0	0
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. 7 13:34, September 4, 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
Stop vandalizing Discovery Cove == It is southwest of Orlando; a more specific and encyclopedic location. 72.153.223.172 ==	0	0	0	0	0
Changed to PPPoE connection My service provider had an outage of late. eventually after phoning a couple of times resetting my router to default etc. they told me to set up a PPPoE connection, now it works. On my mega105wr router my internet led does not come on, only the dsl led is on. My router in the web based management does not show it has a ip address or default gateway. Why is this.	0	0	0	0	0
see you next tuesday C U N T C U N T C U N T C U N T C U N T F A G G O T W A N K E R K I K E	3	3	0	0	3
you are a whiney do nothing you little skank INEVERCRY YOU BETTER WATCH YO BACK BECAUSE I AM OUT TO GET YOUR WHITE ASS OKAY? HOW DARE YOU DELETE OUR WIKIPEDIA PAGE LIKE REALLY? COULD YOU NOT. LIKE DONT EVEN. WE JUST WANTED YOU TO KNOW ABOUT CAROLINE & TYLER BUT NOOOOOOOOOO. YOU HAD TO DELETE IT. TBH UR NOT GR8 LOSER. A CATS LITTER BOX IS MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN YOU. I WILL RUN YOUR ASS UP A FLAG POLE & LEAVE YOU THERE UNTIL THE CROWS PECK YOUR BEADY LITTLE EYES OUT. KAWWWW-KAWWWW.	2	3	0	0	3
The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any notable controversies. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources (emph added) As a rough estimate, of the ~500 references of Koenig, ~100 have been since his disappearance in January. And I am willing to bet that there will be scant few pieces of coverage of him and his work in the future which do not include coverage of his death. On what do you base your claim that his death and disappearance are negligable importance to the topic of his life? MM 207.69.139.137	0	0	0	0	0
Absurd claims Stop, you dimwit. Your accusations and insinuations may be well-intentioned but you are clueless. Sure, be bold but don't be fucking stupid. -	0	0	0	0	2
"Are you retarded? The owner of the label tweeted that he was with their team , so how obvious much more ""reliable"" do you people need it to be? Yeah, actually they are right most of the time but you abuse your power on the site. The edits I did on Love More by Chris Brown, Crooked Smile by J Cole, Jay Z's single being platinum and the sales for several hip hop albums were all correct but you're too butthurt to not undue them because it wasn't directly posted by Billboard until a few days later. "	0	0	0	2	1
Global Country of World Peace I've been working on this article, but you deleted it because you felt it was spam. Is there any chance I could get the text back so I can improve it? Thanks!	0	0	0	0	0
"I have modified the dab page Fringe so it displays the contents of the Fringe theory category. Suggest that ""Fringe theory"" and ""Fringe theories"" be redirected to Fringe. "	0	0	0	0	0
REDIRECT Talk:It's a Wonderful World (1939 film)	0	0	0	0	0
" Proposed change 2.1 in 1953 Iran coup article lead Aliwiki (above) and Kurdo (here) have both made complaints about the proposed changes that I think have merit, so I'm revising the change so that Iran falling under the influence of the expansionist Soviet Communist ""empire""[7] refers to the US administration point of view and not a statement of fact. The to-be-revised text and revised text are in italics. Current wording ""Initially, Britain mobilized its military to seize control of the Abadan oil refinery, the world's largest, but Prime Minister Clement Attlee opted instead to tighten the economic boycott.Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran while using Iranian agents to undermine his government.Kinzer, All the Shah's Men, p.3 (In October 1952 Mosaddeq ""orders the British embassy shut"" after learning of British plotting to overthrow him.) With a change to more conservative governments in both Britain and the United States, Churchill and the U.S. administration of Dwight D. Eisenhower decided to overthrow Iran's government though the predecessor U.S. Truman administration had opposed a coup.Kinzer, Stephen. All the Shah's Men. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2008, p. 3"" ""The tangible benefits the United States reaped from overthrowing Iran's elected government was a share of Iran's oil wealthKinzer, Stephen, Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (Henry Holt and Company 2006). p. 200–201 as well as the resolute prevention of the slim possibility that the Iranian government might align itself with the Soviet Union, although the latter motivation produces controversy among historians as to the seriousness of the threat."" Proposed change ""Initially, Britain mobilized its military to seize control of the Abadan oil refinery, the world's largest, but Prime Minister Clement Attlee opted instead to tighten the economic boycott.Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran while using Iranian agents to undermine his government.Kinzer, All the Shah's Men, p.3 (In October 1952 Mosaddeq ""orders the British embassy shut"" after learning of British plotting to overthrow him.) By 1953 both Britain and the United States had more conservative governments and the new US Eisenhower administration reversed its predessor's opposition to a coup, fearing that Iran was in danger of falling under the influence of the expansionist Soviet Communist ""empire"".Little, Douglas. American Orientalism: the United States and the Middle East since 1945, I.B.Tauris, 2003, p. 216. ISBN 1860648894"" ""The tangible benefits the United States reaped from overthrowing Iran's elected government was a share of Iran's oil wealthKinzer, Stephen, Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (Henry Holt and Company 2006). p. 200–201 as well as the prevention of possibility that Iran might fall under the influence of the Communist Soviet Union.Gasiorowski, Mosaddeq, p.274"" The reason for the change is the same as the original one and is discussed here I know you didn't make any comment on my last attempt but I hope you will find this one is a true improvement. "	0	0	0	0	0
Cobra Ajna is the Cobra Chakra(Naja Naja/ Naga). It is both masculine(as a cobra), or feminine(as a fish).	0	0	0	0	0
School naming Ah, I see - Even so, with schools (but NOT with school districts) I tend to go all the way anyway since there may be a school of the same name proposed and built elsewhere in a given state. I tend to go all the way with school names to be on the safe side UNLESS there is only one school in the whole world with that name. Also - Some schools are better known by the city than by the state.	0	0	0	0	0
" jftr, what the above refers to Former MPs do have working links in Parliament. If you weren't so eager to smash things rather than fix them, you would have noticed that. And you couldn't even be bothered to let me know there might be a problem. I hope our paths never cross again but I suppose I'll have to watch your contributions in future to make sure you aren't deleting everything I do. What a waste of time. Oh yeah - I'll assume you were smashing in good faith. As if. Thanks for ruining my (formerly) good mood, as I was enjoying making some useful contributions to Wikipedia articles. Welcome to Wikipedia. Now, a recap. With this edit you added a link to the current MPs list, for Carter. Problem was it was for David Carter, not John Carter so I removed it. I went to replace it with one for John Carter, but there is none, so I couldn't. You then added another link, but like the first one it too went to the wrong person, this time, Cam Calder. I removed it with the edit summary ""Cannot replace it because Carter is no longer an mp"". You have responded by inserting a brand new link to Former MPs. I was unaware Carter has been added to that list, but that is beside the point because I was removing links to current MPs. If you intend to edit Wikipedia for a while I suggest you don't shout in your edit summaries as you did with ""Former MPs DO HAVE WORKING LINKS. Wikipedians fix links rather than delete them"", and you address the actual issue and don't jump to conclusions. Not true! The actual issue was that you deleted ALL the links I added for him. That is the recap. The two other links worked fine, but you deleted them as well in your hurry to smash everything someone else did. In other words, you are the one who jumped to conclusions. Now you're trying to claim you only deleted the one that was a problem. Even your edit summary is wrong. The man's resignation was presented the same day I was adding the links, unknown to me, so it seems the Parliament link was being moved from current to former which caused pointer problems when I clicked on it. Things happen. It only needed to be fixed. I would have thought an Admin would be capable of figuring that out. Nor could you figure out how to leave a message on my Talk page so I could figure it out. You just couldn't wait to smash everything. I only came back to the article because I was going through the non-Cabinet people on the list. Did you fix that list, once you realized this was a former MP? No, you did not. That would have been ""work"", requiring ""thought"" and ""effort"". Same as you mis-corrected the hat note on the other John Carter MP. Based on your arrogance, I thought it likely you were an Admin. What a surprise, I was right. And Jimbo wonders why the numbers of actual contributors are going straight downhill. I have NO intention of continuing to contribute to Wikipedia because you obviously would prefer to do everything yourself. You're not at all welcoming, helpful, polite, assuming good faith, or anything else I was led to believe is part of the Wikipedia ethos. So I leave you to it. You didn't even have the grace to apologize for deleting the other links, you just tried to blame me in this audit trail. Go lecture someone else, because I'm out of here, and you can be sure I won't be encouraging anyone else to participate in what could have been a good project. Your attitude is horrendous, and I'm sure I'm not the first one you've chased out of here. Well, keep it up and you'll soon have the whole thing to yourself. Enjoy. Go brag to your friends that you got rid of another contributor. I'm sure you're very proud of yourself. "	0	0	0	0	2
Perhaps you are worth less than a cockroach. Ya think???	0	0	0	1	1
Thank you Hello Epbr123, I just wanted to say thank you for continually bringing good candidates to RfA: you're doing a great job. Keep it up! ) ''''	0	0	0	0	0
Well then it asserts that they were all fake. It is no more possible to provide evidence of a fake than it is of Santa Claus. The Saddam claim makes it clear what the problem is - people make this stuff up. Any evidence that Saddam's son had one much less used it? All sorts of bullshit claims have been made about Saddam, I notice few people have even tried to prove them. How can I present evidence of a fake if they are all fake? I can't prove Santa Claus does not exist either. The onus of proof in an encyclopedia ought to be on the people making a positive claim - and if no one can find evidence of its existence it ought to go. The same way there is no page on the existence of unicorns. The spikes thing is clear an ex posto rationalisation as there are no existing models (and probably never were) and what evidence there is is that the spikes did not move. People, for some reason, want to believe this is true and are very very resistent to the truth. Wikipedia should not be in the business of peddling half-baked urban legends. It ought to go entirely, but failing that it ought to be modified until such time someone can provide evidence of its existence. Which I suspect no one will.	0	0	0	0	0
"Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. xd(?!? - help us) "	0	0	0	0	0
" Instead thing of a good reason like ""good edits, will watch this person"" and I will repay you with kindness and continue to make great wikipedia edits.}}"	0	0	0	0	0
" As I recall that was exactly what I suggested 10 years ago (see above) when insisted the Supremacy thingy needed to remain while selectively deleting the other section. Gnothi seauton "	0	0	0	0	0
I already did. It should be deleted.	0	0	0	0	0
" on SIL's minimal work in Europe... Removing the ""citation needed"" from the comment about SIL's work in Europe being minimal, based on the lack of data on European languages at http://www.sil.org/silewp/indexes/countries.asp http://www.ethnologue.com/country_index_bibl.asp and the minimal amount of references on European languages, compared with other parts of the world, at http://www.ethnologue.com/country_index_bibl.asp. Putting such a citation in the text would be rather cumbersome! "	0	0	0	0	0
Response by Steaphen. As has been demonstrated by many others on this subject, you, like them, have used continuous functions reliant on continuity. What evidence supports your assumption of space-time continuity, particularly at and below Planck scales? As with others, you'll find no grounds for such an assumption. Your equations are irrelevant to the issue of Zeno's Paradoxes.	0	0	0	0	0
" Inappropriate ((disputed tag)) tags removed, discussion of ((disputed-section)) tags (""Not in agreement with other sources"") user:Phmoreno has added several inappropriate {{Disputed tag\|talk=Crucible steel#Not in agreement with other sources}} tags, each paired with a (more reasonable) {{disputed-section\|date=July 2014}}. I assume Phmoreno intended to provide a description of his concerns, and misused {{Disputed tag}} for that purpose. I have removed those, and added this section to discuss the {{Disputed-section}} for the reason ""Not in agreement with other sources"". As things stand, that comment seems inadequate to describe the problem. "	0	0	0	0	0
Not as long as the sourced material here is not deleted.	0	0	0	0	0
"span class=""autosigned"">—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) <"	0	0	0	0	0
Abey Chutiyaay wikipedian. Oye.. Ludayyy k baal you and Mr. Amartyabaag... what the fuck are you doing?? Laand!!! I will kick off your ass If I found you. bloody... I'm collecting the pic's and posting it to wiki's and you harmi baal bengali bokka chooda deleting the pic's... Salley laudayy... you rectify the pic's no need to delete them. make it to a proper order if you feel like that due to more addition of pic's script is not being displayed then correct it. Don't delete the pic's... lannd k baal...	2	2	0	0	3
Hello! Sorry for meddling in your business, but I see that you unblocked the above IP with the intention of reblocking and never reblocked him again. Keep in mind, I may have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about so if I'm wrong about any of this, please just ignore me. Thanks.	0	0	0	0	0
WHY AM I CONSTANTLY BEING BLOCKED?	0	0	0	0	0
Actually there is a huge logic to Rastafari but like any complex subject it may appear incomprehensible to thosen who dont understand where the movement is coming from. Surely all religion is by nature absurd, if it wasnt it wouldnt be religion and for me this makes Rasta a genuine faith. By all means find some sourceable criticism and add it but saying the Rasta beliefs are beyond the pale wont wash eg in their belief that life is to be lived here on earth and not in some promised after life Rastas have shown themselves to be far more rational than other religions, and in His Majesty they have chosen a man of high moral calibre to be God and King, much better than all those false prophet cult leaders like Hubbard, Moon, etc,	1	0	2	0	0
Ok. That's probably a good idea.	0	0	0	0	0
I dont see that either of these apply. Its just a fact. Not my opinion and not biased. I am not saying that its good or bad, only that it has happened. Perhaps it is you that lacks a NPOV? 110.174.23.139	0	0	0	0	0
Inflated Britney Sales Someone is making up random numbers. The person says that Britney's album sold 14.7 mill, but Soundscan said it sold 10.5 mill and went 14x platinum. We need to block him cos he's jacked up Britney sales. I wouldn't be surprises if it stated that her debut sold 50 mill a few weeks from now.	0	0	0	0	0
deletion of Slow mo smile A9: Non-notable music by artist with no Wikipedia article. Hi, I just wanted to point out that the band has an article. In fact, Bottlesmoker has been re-created twice already. Would that warrant a salting?	0	0	0	0	0
" Template:2012OlympicAthleticsSchedule Hi, the dates and times listed for Women's 100m hurdles and 400m hurdles are incorrect. The 100m hurdles' SF and F are both in the afternoon session of Tues 7, while the final for the 400m hurdles is during the afternoon session on Wed 8. Seems like the only way to fix the template is to add a col to the Tues 7 heading (and subsequently to each event afterward) to accommodate the double SF and F, but I'm not sure so I'll let you deal with it ;). Thanks! "	0	0	0	0	0
"*""A winner is you"" was undoubtably the inspiration, but the original source for that is the NES game - Irrational Exuberance simply referenced that. I'm pretty sure KoL is referencing the original - the authors of KoL are rather fond of retro games, and the Kingdom is literally filled with references to them. \| (talk) \| (contribs) "	0	0	0	0	0
" Due to past blocks on you part to me and your lack of iniciative at protecting not only me, but all other users participating at that article, I will consider your above message ad hominem threats and harassment personally directed against me. If you accuse me again of violatiing WP:3RR you are pushing too hard! You know the anon keeps vandalising the article even if a consensus was reached. On your part you are not doing anything to prevent it. The anon has edited many more times than me and another bunch of users is also reverting the vandal anon. Why am I the only warned by you? Is this a personal fixation against me? Watch yourself Toddst1... I'm thinking about opening at Wikipedia:RFC/ADMIN an Appeal to the Arbitration Committee against you. Are you going to block me again for asking them for help? Or will you prevent the article to be vandalize? Probably your only interested in getting another banstar to your collection instead than making your job as admin? You are so conceited. If you protected the article we would not need to revert the anon. I do not salute you. MauritiusXXVII (Aut Disce, Aut Doce, Aut Discede!). "	0	0	0	0	2

sir these are the sources. In which it is clearly stated that Mughals were defeated and retreated in the second battle of Anandpur Johar, Surinder Singh (1998). Holy Sikh shrines. New Delhi: M D Publications. p. 46. ISBN 978-81-7533-073-3. OCLC 44703461. 3. Singh, Bhagat Lakshman (1995). Short Sketch of the Life and Work of Guru Govind Singh, The Tenth and Last Guru. Laurier Books Ltd. /AES. p. 96. ISBN 978-81-206-0576-3. OCLC 55854929. 4. Singh, Prithi Pal (2007). The History of Sikh Gurus. Lotus Books. p. 146. ISBN 978-81-8382-075-2. 5. Singh, Dalip (1992). Guru Gobind Singh and Khalsa Discipline. Amritsar: Singh Bros. p. 256. ISBN 978-81-7205-071-9. OCLC 28583123.

0

And you can join him too and stfu.

0

1

" Adam Rose John Cena lover Why do you defend PG wrestling when you don't even know what the fuck WWE is about? Why defend a phony wrestler like John Cena and a faggot ass queer who likes to have a fist in his anus like Adam Rose? "

0

3

0

1

Does this organization define or indentify itself as part of 'truth movement'? What is another 'truther group', does such construct exist outside of Wikipedia mindset?

0

, the military command for both Iraq and Afghanistan area of operations

0

Tiderolls, I wish to report Abhishek191288 for repeatedly undoing my images & constantly threatening me with blocking. I request that as his editing is targetive, irrelevant & self glorifying he be blocked from any editing on articles of Indian Railways.

1

0

1

Patrick Drake??? When did Carly ever have a romance with Patrick Drake?? Ive been watching the show since 04 and Carly is one of my fav characters. The only doctors I remember her ever being involved with was Dr. Tony Jones and a very, very, very brief flirtation with Dr. Steven Lars Webber. Please clarify and fix!

0

I just posted a link at the front page of the article for the Tom Hanks Family Tree that proves he has Portuguese ancestry. Also, another site I came across also proves that Tom Hanks and Abraham Lincoln, are relatives, some even debate that Abraham Lincoln comes from Portuguese immigrant lineage...as well as Al Gore. I haven't found any sources YET that proves that both Lincoln and Gore are from Portuguese immigrant lineage.

0

Your nonsense Shouldn't you be edit-warring on some Israeli-Palestinian article like you usually do to push your Arabist pov instead of trolling on my talk page? Do not disrupt my talk page again.

2

0

1

p.s. Wow, these two characters: Jiang and Changlc are already all over me. Who are these guys and how can I get them to stop reverting my changes?

0

has no life or friends

0

1

0

You are a cocksucking faggot D

0

3

0

2

A pacemaker like implantable device designed by company_name to electrically activate the baroreflex would probably be OK in the first sentence. By the way, none of this guarantees it will not be removed by other editors, but it makes it more likely that it will not be removed. (talk)

0

its abilities are √ dumbshit...

0

2

0

" February 2009 (UTC) I think it's fine as it is, considering that Blitz only brought up the discussion on cameos when talking about Hill. Is there anything specific that you'd prefer to see here? — 03:18, 8"

0

" Shit, man....... Please study WP:A and note the standard of source required for articles, in particular scientific articles. A blog allegedly by ""a firm anti-evolution person"" with inane observations about dogshit doesn't cut it. The best part is the second comment, while your comment (No. 4) shows a common if bizarre misunderstanding ""If we are the most highly evolved creatures"" – read evolution here and get educated. Ta for the laff, .. , talk "

0

1

I am curious who is left that is outside this group who have edited together. I mean isn't that what canvasing Votestacking is - bringing in familiar people for a headcount. I haven't edited with any other editor here (outside of this article). Is there anyone else here who is in that position? Regarding the Altercations sections, even without the naming, the current version is inaccurate. The lawsuit was never filed. The settlement was for a potential one. That should be non controversial. I'm sure no one wants an error to remain.

0

Sadly, it's true.- .talk.stalk. mail.csb 21:57, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

0

Since she uses that word, I'm free to use it too.

0

1

0

BLP Please be cautious about BLP violations. You've added false information to Samuel Estreicher twice now. This is not acceptable. In response to your post on my talk page: please know that you should not add false information to BLPs. Both the edits you made are not supported by the cite and appear to be patently false. A campaign donation from 2008 sourced only to a public record of the donation itself also does not belong in the opening paragraphs. No need to resort to attacking me when you were in the wrong. You messed up. I pointed out where you were wrong. Please don't do it again. There's nothing bad faith about me letting you know that you shouldn't be violating core policies. I'm sorry if it's upsetting to have your errors pointed out, but it's important that you understand that you can't add false information or improperly sourced information, or other distorted information to biographical articles of living people. Thanks.

0

1

And he also uses that sentence as a reason for not restoring the previous section.

0

Oh go away Artkos. Go and make a total pest of yourself elsewhere not where others are trying to do stuff.

0

1

Never the less, at the end of the day you were still blocked for violating a discretionary sanction, despite your assertion of vague formulations of the original 1RR article remedy which was imposed on 18 January 2010. As such you should be logged like the others who have similarly violated the 1RR restriction. As much as I don't like this blanket restriction on past violators (and I include myself here), it should be applied equally without exception.

0

" Discussion habits food USA American eating habits owe a great deal to that of their British culinary roots with some variations. Although American lands could grow newer vegetables England could not, most colonists would not eat these new foods until accepted by Europeans. The source here is to a broken link. The link is to a page where I can buy a book. Not an actual source, there's no proof and all that this quote is in the book. I have researched this independently on my own and have not found anything of the sort related to this material. This is an opinionated argument and not a fact you can easily look up. The source does not share this quote or fact; it isn't in it from any link posted and is in fact a broken source and a link that does not lead to the information written. I recommend deleting this post until the user or whoever has written it can find identifiable information by a credible source leading to the statement. It does not further the page or help anyone understand anything about this topic nor is credible or have any identifiable backing of any kind."

0

Age of Carlsbad Caverns I have attempted to answer your question at Talk:Carlsbad Caverns National Park.

0

YOURE A FAG. AND IF YOU WRITE ANYTHING ELSE ON MY TALK PAGE IN RESPONSE TO THIS, THAT IS HOW YOU WILL ADMIT BEING A FAG.

0

3

0

1

This is the start of JamCad605's User Talk.

0

I reported it on the appropriate sanctions noticeboard, but in the meantime, are we just supposed to leave up specious false insinuations about someone because an IP doesn't care if they get 3RR blocked?

0

1

is sara Palin email hack article supposed to be deleted? I looked on the sara palin email hack talk page and it said that the article had be nominated for deletion. Is seems that the results are to delete. Why does it still exist ?

0

Thank you for this. I have read the articles and found them useful. I simply don't understand however how The Kate Kennedy Club does not fulfil the criteria of these two issues however. Indeed one only has to search 'Kate Kennedy Club' in either Google Books or simply Google to see the number of accounts of the club's purpose and aims in published books, national newspapers and online. I would be more than happy to list the names of the books/ the links to the articles in national press which reference the club, if that is necessary? Best (talk

0

Summaries off Deltasim Deltasim needs to keep seeing Blinky Bill Season 3. I think it''ll be on ABC2 next week so ask Deltasim to tape each episode to his Tivo. Hope he finds more eps soon. Unregistered Contributor 17:48, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

0

" I don't think the Kirby anime is canonical. (talk) 21:24, August 27, 2005 (UTC)"

0

Re: Many apologies Ok. Play nice now. (Talk)

0

" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:Daemonic Kangaroomy talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! "

0

" Apology You're right. I got a message from GMaxwell, construed it as a threat, and got frustrated and let that out through my edit summaries. I know I have a temper, but that's not an excuse. If i've lost you after my inability to control that rage against the feeling of powerlessness that I and so many others(recently Guanaco has been feeling like this from hearing him in IRC). I can't think of anything else to say right now. If the system can be reformed from the inside, I will follow you, but I have unfortunately lost faith to any real reforms happening through established channels, and i'm going to be timid in that aspect. I'll say more later when i'm better able, but please know that whether your views of me are negative or positive, my views of you are mostly positive, despite our disagreements. afist '''''' "

0

" Of course I understand the process - it is so that do nothing non-entities like you have a reason to exist - perhaps you would like to lecture me on this being a ""volunteer project"". Where is the blocking process that protects me ?"

0

2

1

" ""The war is over. And you lost."" Not quite, Your Arrogance. I'm leaving this vile, post-modernist sewer. Wikipedia will be cleansed, though not by me: it will be many, many others. "

0

1

" **** YOU! P**TANG INA KA! HAYOP KA! WALA SA AKING INTENSYON NA SIRAAN ANG GMA NOR ""BABUYIN"" ANG WIKIPEDIA, KAYA KUNG MERON MAN DAPAT TUMIGIL, IKAW YUN, OK, WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO TELL ME WHAT TO DO, SURE YOU MAY HAVE A ""RANK"" HERE AT WIKIPEDIA, BUT THAT GIVES YOU NO RIGHT, I THOUGHT WIKIPEDIA WAS A PLACE WHERE PEOPLE CAN FREELY SHARE WHAT THEY KNOW AND HAVE REFERENCES, RESOURCES TO BACK IT UP, BUT NO YOU VIEW IT A DIFFERENT WAY, WHERE IT'S ALWAYS GOTTA BE ABOUT YOU AND YOU TAKING THE F***ING BLAME!!! SH** KA! HAYOP! "

0

3

" Rollback Tools Have Disappeared Hello Lupin. Recently something strange has developed with the script for me. I have all the functionalities of the tool that normally would be there, but now I am missing all the rollback links. I am using IE 7 as a browser just I had in the past. Is this a recent bug with the tool or is my browser bugging with the script? (talk) "

0

My dear colleagues-I cannot understand your umbrage. I was reading your sources, and I came to understand that the passage that I was reading was awfully familiar-in fact, the Wikipedia material was a word for word paraphrase of the source with the tenses of verbs changed. I know you will agree with me that it is better to quote the source directly than to paraphrase. Since so I replaced the paraphrase with a quote. Do you object to the quote of your source? I did not choose him I merely followed the footnotes. In following the other footnote, I noticed it had a contrasting view of the origin of the Eucharist and knowing that you would use it as a source I wanted to include it. If you have changes to make, make them. BRD if he says you can't revert as a piece called once merely because you don't like them

0

See here: Talk:The_Bell_Curve. In the upper toolbar, there's a button for 'new section'.

0

I've removed the information entirely as it's irrelevant trivia.

0

" Speedy deletion of Plysh media A tag has been placed on Plysh media, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. "

0

in response to There is a persistent meme in this article and others that models were introduced in response to some model from another company. That may be possible, but the lead time for a set of wheels and some pinstripes is 12 months, any real change is 2 years, and a fundamental change is more like 4 years. So this game of pingpong beloved of wiki editors really doesn't exist. Simple question, if pingpong worked, why did it take Toyota so long to bring the 4wd Kluger out?

0

and perpetuating beliefs of those that just don't want to see said religious words; harassment

0

2

0

1

" Thank you! I always appreciate a good laugh. talk "

0

Mind Readers Software Mind Readers Software is a Prime Minister Web Design and Development company in Chennai with global surrender machine that houses a team of technical, creative and avocation experts who purchase best practices, proven expertise and available means to set free the best in Internet products services company. We point of convergence on all Web-based solutions from subtle and unfolding of Static, Dynamic and liquid Website to portals, to incorporated presentations. Being based in Chennai at India, the relating to traffic principal of India, we procure potent Website Design and Development. At Mind Readers Software we believe in perfectness. This has made us one of the leading Website Design and Development Company in Chennai. For us a website is just not only a rise of intelligence, but also a powerful marketing tool for your business.

0

" Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you want to get involved, but I'm afraid there's a problem with the article you created, Chobots. It did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Don't feel too badly; lots of people have a little trouble when creating their first article. You might find it useful to read Your First Article for some good advice about starting to create articles on Wikipedia. Two important rules of thumb are: Avoid writing about yourself, your business, your family and friends, or your web page, and avoid writing about anything that hasn't been written about in reliable sources like books, newspapers, and magazines. Anyway, don't be discouraged. I've deleted the article you created, and feel free to ask me if you have any more questions. If I've made a mistake, and this article really is about a subject that meets the notability criteria, then please let me know my leaving me a message and links to at least three newspaper articles, magazine articles, or books that have been written about the subject, and I'll be glad to undelete it, and even add the sources so no other patroller makes the same mistake. - (talk · contribs) "

0

Allow me to reiterate the above. He is widely known by the initial, so that's the title we use. If you disagree with that, you can raise the issue on the article talk page. 23:16, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

0

Hey! Thanks for your comment! I am new to Wiki and i will try to improve myself.

0

Support Joe - thanks for the RFA support. You wouldn't believe how difficult it is to update wikipedia like this, without opposable thumbs. I'll keep working on it, evolution is sloooow.

0

1

0

" Deletion Review for Rocktronica An editor has asked for a deletion review of Rocktronica. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. '''''' talk ¤ I am not the requester, just procedurally listed for them on the correct logpage and in correct format. '''''' talk ¤ Deletion Review for Synth rock An editor has asked for a deletion review of Synth rock. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. '''''' talk ¤ I am not the requester, just procedurally listed for them on the correct logpage and in correct format. '''''' talk ¤ "

0

It's very much like the storyline of the Impossible Planet/Satan Pit episodes. A craft/planet is falling into something that would destroy it at the will of a mysterious creature. In IP/SP, it's a Satan-like creature, in 42 it's a star. I get the feeling that Chris Chibnall just ripped off the previously mentioned two-part story, but just compressed it into a single episode. Don't both stories take place in the 42nd century/millennium?

0

3RR You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

0

Did so on Aug 21, there' a backlog on the page, apparently, that's where nothing has been happening. Since I posted there, he still reverted his favorite photo into the Equestrianism article since. It's getting very tiresome. Can anyone just block him from editing equestrianism? It seems to be his favorite prank and the various vandal bots don't seem to catch that one as fast as a lot of the others? (or can we dump the photo? It really is more porn than art...) I'm still fairly new to wikipedia and don't know how all the tools can be used. I also don't monitor constantly... help!

0

1

"Semantic complaint=== The headings of this discussion are potentially misleading. I eventually figured out we're talking about ""cover"" in the sense of ""treat,"" ""include,"" or ""write about"". However, cover can also be taken to mean ""suppress,"" ""bury,"" or ""censor"". That is, those who might be favor of not covering Connolley's desysop in his WP bio might themselves be accused (wrongfully or otherwise) of covering they desysop. Just a thought. ==="

0

" Male graduates before 1969 I've added mention to the 'trivia' section regarding men who matriculated at vassar immediately after world war II on the GI bill. I suppose this could be classified as 'original research', not sure. My father was in that first graduating class that included men (eleven of them). A scan of the relevant portion of the program from the graduation ceremonies can be found here . again, if this constitutes original research, i guess it can be pulled, though it is a rather fascinating bit of history. Bias There are many abundantly clear examples of bias in this article: “Vassar is often praised for its beautiful campus, a 1000 acre (4 km?) lot of land marked by period and modern buildings that is also an arboretum; since that time, it has maintained its reputation as one of America's outstanding liberal arts colleges, and is especially noted for its tolerant social atmosphere; the college is a member of the ""Little Ivies,"" an unaffiliated group of elite northeastern liberal arts colleges; Vassar is a leader in producing doctoral candidates; Vassar students are well known for their individuality, creativity, and open-mindedness; many beautiful old brick buildings are scattered throughout the bucolic campus, but there are also several modern and contemporary structures worth noting."" Did this come straight from the College’s website? Bias ? I disagree with the above allegation of bias in the article. I found no similarity between the Vassar Web site and the article. The information in question - the attractiveness of the campus - seems fairly innocuous and is fairly similar to the type of information in Wikipedia articles about other liberal arts colleges and several universities. The article reads like synopsis of commercially available background information in colleges guide books. While I would have written the main paragraph differently, I hardly think this qualifies as biased, and without some criteria to differentiate this page from other pages on other schools, I believe the objection should be removed from this page. The article violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy, clearly. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, a place to find innformation, not a forum for opinions. If you are unwilling to make changes, then I will go ahead and make them myself. Also, you should leave you name when commenting. Also, I realize that the article is not up to date and violates Wikipedia's policy against personal research (ie, students spend time doing ceratin activities on a certain lawn). I do agree that much of the information on this page is somewhat biased. And the architectural info came from me, not the college's website - so, my apologies for lack of ""neutrality"" there. However, if you edit the page to remove said ""bias"", please re-read your edits before saving the page. Simply removing phrases and not doing a little copyedit makes the page read poorly. I have made some minor edits just so that it reads a little cleaner, hopefully not restoring anything that you feel is biased. I think the bigger issue is that this page has become a series of lists (academic majors, famous alums, residence halls) with little encyclopedic content and is an embarrasment compared to other articles about comparable schools. Someone please help to fix this article! "

0

1

0

" I'm still researching him and working on the article. So far all I've found is that he was born in England and emigrated to New York City with his family when he was a child. I have found no mention of his having become an American citizen. It's a moot point . . . I'm adding enough material that the stub tags no longer will be necessary. Thanks for your input! '''''' (talk • contrib) "

0

A discussion about potential changes to the biography section can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Amir_Abbas_Fakhravar. Proposals have been given for change. Please provide your opinion so that we can reach some consensus.

0

" In the campaign paragraph, it breaks up the flow; however, since it applies to the topics discussed in the civilizations (which are playable), the sentence demonstrates that the Japanese can be fought, but they aren't included as a civilization. — r "

0

sexy time with old saggy grandmas

0

2

0

Please do so. It is better to clarify matters before inserting material, as we want to avoid confusing readers if possible.

0

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. 7 13:34, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

0

Stop vandalizing Discovery Cove == It is southwest of Orlando; a more specific and encyclopedic location. 72.153.223.172 ==

0

Changed to PPPoE connection My service provider had an outage of late. eventually after phoning a couple of times resetting my router to default etc. they told me to set up a PPPoE connection, now it works. On my mega105wr router my internet led does not come on, only the dsl led is on. My router in the web based management does not show it has a ip address or default gateway. Why is this.

0

see you next tuesday C U N T C U N T C U N T C U N T C U N T F A G G O T W A N K E R K I K E

3

0

3

you are a whiney do nothing you little skank INEVERCRY YOU BETTER WATCH YO BACK BECAUSE I AM OUT TO GET YOUR WHITE ASS OKAY? HOW DARE YOU DELETE OUR WIKIPEDIA PAGE LIKE REALLY? COULD YOU NOT. LIKE DONT EVEN. WE JUST WANTED YOU TO KNOW ABOUT CAROLINE & TYLER BUT NOOOOOOOOOO. YOU HAD TO DELETE IT. TBH UR NOT GR8 LOSER. A CATS LITTER BOX IS MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN YOU. I WILL RUN YOUR ASS UP A FLAG POLE & LEAVE YOU THERE UNTIL THE CROWS PECK YOUR BEADY LITTLE EYES OUT. KAWWWW-KAWWWW.

2

3

0

3

The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any notable controversies. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources (emph added) As a rough estimate, of the ~500 references of Koenig, ~100 have been since his disappearance in January. And I am willing to bet that there will be scant few pieces of coverage of him and his work in the future which do not include coverage of his death. On what do you base your claim that his death and disappearance are negligable importance to the topic of his life? MM 207.69.139.137

0

Absurd claims Stop, you dimwit. Your accusations and insinuations may be well-intentioned but you are clueless. Sure, be bold but don't be fucking stupid. -

0

2

"Are you retarded? The owner of the label tweeted that he was with their team , so how obvious much more ""reliable"" do you people need it to be? Yeah, actually they are right most of the time but you abuse your power on the site. The edits I did on Love More by Chris Brown, Crooked Smile by J Cole, Jay Z's single being platinum and the sales for several hip hop albums were all correct but you're too butthurt to not undue them because it wasn't directly posted by Billboard until a few days later. "

0

2

1

Global Country of World Peace I've been working on this article, but you deleted it because you felt it was spam. Is there any chance I could get the text back so I can improve it? Thanks!

0

"I have modified the dab page Fringe so it displays the contents of the Fringe theory category. Suggest that ""Fringe theory"" and ""Fringe theories"" be redirected to Fringe. "

0

REDIRECT Talk:It's a Wonderful World (1939 film)

0

" Proposed change 2.1 in 1953 Iran coup article lead Aliwiki (above) and Kurdo (here) have both made complaints about the proposed changes that I think have merit, so I'm revising the change so that Iran falling under the influence of the expansionist Soviet Communist ""empire""[7] refers to the US administration point of view and not a statement of fact. The to-be-revised text and revised text are in italics. Current wording ""Initially, Britain mobilized its military to seize control of the Abadan oil refinery, the world's largest, but Prime Minister Clement Attlee opted instead to tighten the economic boycott.Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran while using Iranian agents to undermine his government.Kinzer, All the Shah's Men, p.3 (In October 1952 Mosaddeq ""orders the British embassy shut"" after learning of British plotting to overthrow him.) With a change to more conservative governments in both Britain and the United States, Churchill and the U.S. administration of Dwight D. Eisenhower decided to overthrow Iran's government though the predecessor U.S. Truman administration had opposed a coup.Kinzer, Stephen. All the Shah's Men. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2008, p. 3"" ""The tangible benefits the United States reaped from overthrowing Iran's elected government was a share of Iran's oil wealthKinzer, Stephen, Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (Henry Holt and Company 2006). p. 200–201 as well as the resolute prevention of the slim possibility that the Iranian government might align itself with the Soviet Union, although the latter motivation produces controversy among historians as to the seriousness of the threat."" Proposed change ""Initially, Britain mobilized its military to seize control of the Abadan oil refinery, the world's largest, but Prime Minister Clement Attlee opted instead to tighten the economic boycott.Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran while using Iranian agents to undermine his government.Kinzer, All the Shah's Men, p.3 (In October 1952 Mosaddeq ""orders the British embassy shut"" after learning of British plotting to overthrow him.) By 1953 both Britain and the United States had more conservative governments and the new US Eisenhower administration reversed its predessor's opposition to a coup, fearing that Iran was in danger of falling under the influence of the expansionist Soviet Communist ""empire"".Little, Douglas. American Orientalism: the United States and the Middle East since 1945, I.B.Tauris, 2003, p. 216. ISBN 1860648894"" ""The tangible benefits the United States reaped from overthrowing Iran's elected government was a share of Iran's oil wealthKinzer, Stephen, Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (Henry Holt and Company 2006). p. 200–201 as well as the prevention of possibility that Iran might fall under the influence of the Communist Soviet Union.Gasiorowski, Mosaddeq, p.274"" The reason for the change is the same as the original one and is discussed here I know you didn't make any comment on my last attempt but I hope you will find this one is a true improvement. "

0

Cobra Ajna is the Cobra Chakra(Naja Naja/ Naga). It is both masculine(as a cobra), or feminine(as a fish).

0

School naming Ah, I see - Even so, with schools (but NOT with school districts) I tend to go all the way anyway since there may be a school of the same name proposed and built elsewhere in a given state. I tend to go all the way with school names to be on the safe side UNLESS there is only one school in the whole world with that name. Also - Some schools are better known by the city than by the state.

0

" jftr, what the above refers to Former MPs do have working links in Parliament. If you weren't so eager to smash things rather than fix them, you would have noticed that. And you couldn't even be bothered to let me know there might be a problem. I hope our paths never cross again but I suppose I'll have to watch your contributions in future to make sure you aren't deleting everything I do. What a waste of time. Oh yeah - I'll assume you were smashing in good faith. As if. Thanks for ruining my (formerly) good mood, as I was enjoying making some useful contributions to Wikipedia articles. Welcome to Wikipedia. Now, a recap. With this edit you added a link to the current MPs list, for Carter. Problem was it was for David Carter, not John Carter so I removed it. I went to replace it with one for John Carter, but there is none, so I couldn't. You then added another link, but like the first one it too went to the wrong person, this time, Cam Calder. I removed it with the edit summary ""Cannot replace it because Carter is no longer an mp"". You have responded by inserting a brand new link to Former MPs. I was unaware Carter has been added to that list, but that is beside the point because I was removing links to current MPs. If you intend to edit Wikipedia for a while I suggest you don't shout in your edit summaries as you did with ""Former MPs DO HAVE WORKING LINKS. Wikipedians fix links rather than delete them"", and you address the actual issue and don't jump to conclusions. Not true! The actual issue was that you deleted ALL the links I added for him. That is the recap. The two other links worked fine, but you deleted them as well in your hurry to smash everything someone else did. In other words, you are the one who jumped to conclusions. Now you're trying to claim you only deleted the one that was a problem. Even your edit summary is wrong. The man's resignation was presented the same day I was adding the links, unknown to me, so it seems the Parliament link was being moved from current to former which caused pointer problems when I clicked on it. Things happen. It only needed to be fixed. I would have thought an Admin would be capable of figuring that out. Nor could you figure out how to leave a message on my Talk page so I could figure it out. You just couldn't wait to smash everything. I only came back to the article because I was going through the non-Cabinet people on the list. Did you fix that list, once you realized this was a former MP? No, you did not. That would have been ""work"", requiring ""thought"" and ""effort"". Same as you mis-corrected the hat note on the other John Carter MP. Based on your arrogance, I thought it likely you were an Admin. What a surprise, I was right. And Jimbo wonders why the numbers of actual contributors are going straight downhill. I have NO intention of continuing to contribute to Wikipedia because you obviously would prefer to do everything yourself. You're not at all welcoming, helpful, polite, assuming good faith, or anything else I was led to believe is part of the Wikipedia ethos. So I leave you to it. You didn't even have the grace to apologize for deleting the other links, you just tried to blame me in this audit trail. Go lecture someone else, because I'm out of here, and you can be sure I won't be encouraging anyone else to participate in what could have been a good project. Your attitude is horrendous, and I'm sure I'm not the first one you've chased out of here. Well, keep it up and you'll soon have the whole thing to yourself. Enjoy. Go brag to your friends that you got rid of another contributor. I'm sure you're very proud of yourself. "

0

2

Perhaps you are worth less than a cockroach. Ya think???

0

1

Thank you Hello Epbr123, I just wanted to say thank you for continually bringing good candidates to RfA: you're doing a great job. Keep it up! ) ''''

0

Well then it asserts that they were all fake. It is no more possible to provide evidence of a fake than it is of Santa Claus. The Saddam claim makes it clear what the problem is - people make this stuff up. Any evidence that Saddam's son had one much less used it? All sorts of bullshit claims have been made about Saddam, I notice few people have even tried to prove them. How can I present evidence of a fake if they are all fake? I can't prove Santa Claus does not exist either. The onus of proof in an encyclopedia ought to be on the people making a positive claim - and if no one can find evidence of its existence it ought to go. The same way there is no page on the existence of unicorns. The spikes thing is clear an ex posto rationalisation as there are no existing models (and probably never were) and what evidence there is is that the spikes did not move. People, for some reason, want to believe this is true and are very very resistent to the truth. Wikipedia should not be in the business of peddling half-baked urban legends. It ought to go entirely, but failing that it ought to be modified until such time someone can provide evidence of its existence. Which I suspect no one will.

0

"Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. xd(?!? - help us) "

0

" Instead thing of a good reason like ""good edits, will watch this person"" and I will repay you with kindness and continue to make great wikipedia edits.}}"

0

" As I recall that was exactly what I suggested 10 years ago (see above) when insisted the Supremacy thingy needed to remain while selectively deleting the other section. Gnothi seauton "

0

I already did. It should be deleted.

0

" on SIL's minimal work in Europe... Removing the ""citation needed"" from the comment about SIL's work in Europe being minimal, based on the lack of data on European languages at http://www.sil.org/silewp/indexes/countries.asp http://www.ethnologue.com/country_index_bibl.asp and the minimal amount of references on European languages, compared with other parts of the world, at http://www.ethnologue.com/country_index_bibl.asp. Putting such a citation in the text would be rather cumbersome! "

0

Response by Steaphen. As has been demonstrated by many others on this subject, you, like them, have used continuous functions reliant on continuity. What evidence supports your assumption of space-time continuity, particularly at and below Planck scales? As with others, you'll find no grounds for such an assumption. Your equations are irrelevant to the issue of Zeno's Paradoxes.

0

" Inappropriate ((disputed tag)) tags removed, discussion of ((disputed-section)) tags (""Not in agreement with other sources"") user:Phmoreno has added several inappropriate {{Disputed tag|talk=Crucible steel#Not in agreement with other sources}} tags, each paired with a (more reasonable) {{disputed-section|date=July 2014}}. I assume Phmoreno intended to provide a description of his concerns, and misused {{Disputed tag}} for that purpose. I have removed those, and added this section to discuss the {{Disputed-section}} for the reason ""Not in agreement with other sources"". As things stand, that comment seems inadequate to describe the problem. "

0

Not as long as the sourced material here is not deleted.

0

"span class=""autosigned"">—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) <"

0

Abey Chutiyaay wikipedian. Oye.. Ludayyy k baal you and Mr. Amartyabaag... what the fuck are you doing?? Laand!!! I will kick off your ass If I found you. bloody... I'm collecting the pic's and posting it to wiki's and you harmi baal bengali bokka chooda deleting the pic's... Salley laudayy... you rectify the pic's no need to delete them. make it to a proper order if you feel like that due to more addition of pic's script is not being displayed then correct it. Don't delete the pic's... lannd k baal...

2

0

3

Hello! Sorry for meddling in your business, but I see that you unblocked the above IP with the intention of reblocking and never reblocked him again. Keep in mind, I may have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about so if I'm wrong about any of this, please just ignore me. Thanks.

0

WHY AM I CONSTANTLY BEING BLOCKED?

0

Actually there is a huge logic to Rastafari but like any complex subject it may appear incomprehensible to thosen who dont understand where the movement is coming from. Surely all religion is by nature absurd, if it wasnt it wouldnt be religion and for me this makes Rasta a genuine faith. By all means find some sourceable criticism and add it but saying the Rasta beliefs are beyond the pale wont wash eg in their belief that life is to be lived here on earth and not in some promised after life Rastas have shown themselves to be far more rational than other religions, and in His Majesty they have chosen a man of high moral calibre to be God and King, much better than all those false prophet cult leaders like Hubbard, Moon, etc,

1

0

2

0

Ok. That's probably a good idea.

0

I dont see that either of these apply. Its just a fact. Not my opinion and not biased. I am not saying that its good or bad, only that it has happened. Perhaps it is you that lacks a NPOV? 110.174.23.139

0

Inflated Britney Sales Someone is making up random numbers. The person says that Britney's album sold 14.7 mill, but Soundscan said it sold 10.5 mill and went 14x platinum. We need to block him cos he's jacked up Britney sales. I wouldn't be surprises if it stated that her debut sold 50 mill a few weeks from now.

0

deletion of Slow mo smile A9: Non-notable music by artist with no Wikipedia article. Hi, I just wanted to point out that the band has an article. In fact, Bottlesmoker has been re-created twice already. Would that warrant a salting?

0

" Template:2012OlympicAthleticsSchedule Hi, the dates and times listed for Women's 100m hurdles and 400m hurdles are incorrect. The 100m hurdles' SF and F are both in the afternoon session of Tues 7, while the final for the 400m hurdles is during the afternoon session on Wed 8. Seems like the only way to fix the template is to add a col to the Tues 7 heading (and subsequently to each event afterward) to accommodate the double SF and F, but I'm not sure so I'll let you deal with it ;). Thanks! "

0

"*""A winner is you"" was undoubtably the inspiration, but the original source for that is the NES game - Irrational Exuberance simply referenced that. I'm pretty sure KoL is referencing the original - the authors of KoL are rather fond of retro games, and the Kingdom is literally filled with references to them. | (talk) | (contribs) "

0

" Due to past blocks on you part to me and your lack of iniciative at protecting not only me, but all other users participating at that article, I will consider your above message ad hominem threats and harassment personally directed against me. If you accuse me again of violatiing WP:3RR you are pushing too hard! You know the anon keeps vandalising the article even if a consensus was reached. On your part you are not doing anything to prevent it. The anon has edited many more times than me and another bunch of users is also reverting the vandal anon. Why am I the only warned by you? Is this a personal fixation against me? Watch yourself Toddst1... I'm thinking about opening at Wikipedia:RFC/ADMIN an Appeal to the Arbitration Committee against you. Are you going to block me again for asking them for help? Or will you prevent the article to be vandalize? Probably your only interested in getting another banstar to your collection instead than making your job as admin? You are so conceited. If you protected the article we would not need to revert the anon. I do not salute you. MauritiusXXVII (Aut Disce, Aut Doce, Aut Discede!). "

0

2