text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
":My opinion is similar to the Ottawaman's; I think that some the background material fits the prohibition you listed above of being ""unduly self-serving"" and I think that ""reliable source"" and ""campaign website"" are mutually exclusive propositions.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Source!
http://www.toonzone.net/forums/showthread.php?t=278990
+ The official MAD magazine. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Here is the FIFA´s source in spanish . Look for it in the english version. Is that alla right??? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Hounding
Asarlaí, whilst I've no problem with the changes you've just made at Flags of country subdivisions, I can't help but notice that you'd never edited it before now and I don't think it's the first time this has happened. Have you been trawling through my contributions? Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
for your viewing pleasure: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Natalie_Zea#allegations_about_her_cat 86.43.216.73 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Missing info, advertising
This is not a very well written page. It could be deleted if it's not changed. Also, it's missing former members Josh and Pasquale (sic?).
Unfortunately I have no idea how to change it. Someone help! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Justin Berry
Greetings... Thanks for your work to improve the article on Justin Berry, especially in archiving the talk page & fixing the redundant references. I noticed you moved the High school section back to the top of the article. I was planning on deleting the section since it contains uncited references, based on previous discussions in Talk:Justin Berry/Archive 1 regarding the deletion of the original article and the need to carefully cite sources. I had initially moved that section to the end of the article, so as not to emphasize it over & above the focus of the article, the situation for which Berry gained notoriety, and to give the original contributor a chance to add a citation.
I wanted to give you some background on the situation with this article. There are strong feelings among some of the editors on this article, and there has been a complaint from the article's subject about the article's accuracy & point-of-view, resulting in | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Coordinate error
The following coordinate fixes are needed for Hellingly railway station. The wikipedia icon should be at 50°53'9.50""N 0°15'4.81""E. Intstead its about 500 feet off. —76.105.145.143 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I'm well aware of the old cliché: ""it takes two to tango"". However, those users who were on the receiving end of Roux's reprehensible behaviour certainly were given cause for concern. I find the general dismissal of their concerns and the excusing of the bad behaviour to be undamirable in itself. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Yeah I guess you're right. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Scutfargus
If you will re-read wikipedia guidelines, this does not automatically make such a link spam. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs).
If you just go and include them again, yes it does. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Early life
William Hosking travelled to Australia with his parents and later returned to the UK. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Opinions of the Tea Party outside of the United States?
Seems relevant but I don't see that information here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I think you have done a great job with the page, and I learned a lot from reading it and the other comments posted above. I like that you were able to make use of some of the information we covered in class specifically related to this topic, but were also able to include plenty of outside resources. Many of the concerns I had have been addressed in prior comments, but there is one section that I find slightly unclear. It may just be the way I am reading your wording, but I figure there is always a chance that someone else will take it the same way and have the same question I do... In the toxicology studies section, I think your intention is to say that because the mouse study used very high doses of the protein and proteins that will be toxic are usually toxic at very low doses, evidence supports that the Bt toxin is not toxic to mammals.
what I initially read, however, was just the phrase ""Research on other known toxic proteins suggests that proteins are usually toxic at low doses, further suggesting that Bt toxins are not toxic to mammals"" which confused me by making it sound like the toxins are almost always toxic at low doses and that the Bt toxin might not be safe. Perhaps changing this wording would help clarify your meaning for future readers? Just a thought. Overall, great job! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sometimes I worry about you, Modernist! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, or whatever it is you are doing... I don't know | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
More important to follow the rules. When I get paid for full time editing, I'll round up a posse and follow the rules too. Until then it far more important to follow the rules than actually give a hoot about the content. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quote
I am concerned that the quote in by Edward Lao Rhodes is too long. Do we have his publisher's permission to use it? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Thanks for the response, Bagumba. You have more than convinced me that it did not belong. Cheers. Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAGGOT HUGE FAG | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
Whoops. Nice job, kiddo.
You said, one some poor guy's talk page:
I hope you will use this block time to consider a few matters that could make you a better editor, should you decide to continue. First, Wikipedia editors aren't nearly as stupid as you think they are. We include many people with advanced degrees who work in scholarly professions. Many of us can see through the kind of lies that you tried to use better than we can see through glass. Secondly, disruptive editing, lying, and attempts to sabotage the system not only get you into trouble, they also defeat the very goals that you are trying to achieve. If MattyBraps is deleted, one of the major reasons (but certainly not the only reason) is your behavior as creator of the article. You did serious damage to your own efforts to keep the article on Wikipedia. And finally, take some time to read Wikipedia policies. Start with WP:5P, and every time you see a blue link, click it and read what you see. If you can do these things, you might stand a chance of becoming a good editor. Otherwise, you need to move on to somewhere else to spend your time. Think about it.
I would contend that Wikipedia editors are, in fact, as stupid as I suspect, as you still fail to grasp that the BT guy and I (the IP user you believe he sockpuppeted) are not the same person. All it took was me mirroring the way he types, pretending to be angry, and claiming ""I made the [Mattybraps] page,"" and boom, I got him blocked. Thanks for helping me settle a bet about whether or not I could get the creator of the Mattyb wikipedia page (it's an embarrassment that it exists) banned inside of a week. I too have an advanced degree turns out nobody gives a shit, champ. Keep up the excellent work. 75.64.190.21
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
":The ""rampant speculation"" was a cited statistic. The cite was not of a high quality, but it was certainly not speculation.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
YOU REMOVE MY MESSAGE OF BANNING MYSELF??I""M GOING TO SCREW YOUR PAGE UP!" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
I disagree. The proposal for universal background checks is about applying NICS to all gun sales, not just at gun shows and not just just by FFLs. It is related to the gun show loophole, but it's not solely about it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
You are busy in real life, but your past work was fantastic ) | " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
This is an oooold subject/section here, but I agree, the highly detailed diagram is quite scary-looking to a novice reader, and much more complicated than the basics of the topic. Start with something simpler, since there are certainly simpler aspects of diffraction than multislit-with-vectors. File:Wave Diffraction 4Lambda Slit.png would certainly be an improvement (simpler case, still a pretty picture that clearly illustrates some key ideas). I think that diagram would be even better if the barrier/slit were actually visible clearly rather than just another thin black line in a parallel field of black lines: consider either File:Difraction.png or File:Difrakce sterbina bodova.png. Somewhat related, seems like there is no navbox for the wave-phenomena articles. Having a directory of the reflection, refraction, diffraction, interferences, etc. main articles would be a great way to tie together all these pages and help students work through/among them. 20:14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Somewhere in a jail in Franklin County, New York, There is an inmate named Mark Woodard. I will offer $500,000 to whoever can kill him in the most violent way possible. Once the deed is done you will find your money burried under the Nigger Guidebord in Fort Ann, New York. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
I agree with you here. I'm going to propose a serious overhaul outlined below. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Happy St. Paddy's Day
Have a happy day, Abce2. D Malke2010 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::Respectable guide books (in their printed versions) mostly count as reliable sources, and, interestingly, most such respectable guide books are very uncomplimentary about Gibraltar as a tourist destination. (In comparison to the lovely areas of the Spanish coast to the west of Gibraltar.) If there really are concerns about the Gibraltar government's off-hand comments about not wanting ""nasty"" material added - which seemed quite innocent and unremarkable to me - then the concerned people should spend some time adding neutral and due weight content from guide books to some of the Gibraltar-related article. I somehow doubt there will be mass reverting of such additions, which will helpfully show that we're still getting neutral and encyclopedic content.
If all of this brings us to a point where detailed summaries of such respected guide books can be easily accessed through Wikipedia when visiting Andalucia, that would be a huge benefit to people like me. So get to it!
(Disclaimer - I was in Gibraltar earlier this month, but I don't have anything to do with Gibraltarpedia. I didn't meet any members of the government, although I did take a look at the Governor's Bible.) (talk)
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Perhaps the house is a Is it a Cubist structure.67.175.151.136 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This small section of the talk page cleared things out for me. Aye, Wikipedia should loosen up its guidelines a tad bit. I'm forced to goto ED for information dang it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Hegumen, you need to brush up your German. I believe that you intentionally fail to notice the following quote: ""westbulgarisch (macedonisch)"". Whether the sources are suitable, is the reader's right to decide. Many sources speak of ""multiple Bulgarian recensions"" and two major literary centres in Bulgaria.
Second, the Ohrid Literary School is Bulgarian by ethnicity. There are no authentic sources which mention ""Macedonian"" ethnicity prior to the 18th century. On the cotrary, they mention Bulgarian and Slav concurrently. Can you prove me wrong? If you continue to dispute the sourced information, I will expand the section to prove my point about the Bulgarian character of the Ohrid Literary School. However I hope we can reach an agreement on the current state of the article, as it treats the language issue generally without focusing on separate schools. " | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Hunter Infiniti
Do you like Hunter Infiniti? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.137.244.94 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Your edit on ""Karachi""...
Hi, I have some concerns on the edit you made in the ""Problems"" page of the ""Karachi"" page on October 13, 2006. I would like to change the ""Pervez Musharraf"" (you should hopefully know very well what I am talking about) back to ""Naimatullah Khan"" since I think it is better to credit someone who personally runs the city for improvements. Thanx.. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I ""get stopped""? What does that mean? Is that a threat? Be a more positive editor and I won't have to follow you around and clean up your messes. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Hey Pretty Green, Okay but how do I make the other People and the overall consensus Agree with me that at least this Main Article Page be Actually Named To ICC Cricket World Cup because this is the Actual name the ICC has just like FIFA and not to mention the 'Cricket' word will already be Included. Otherwise i have no other problem with it being named as 'Cricket World Cup'. Just wanted that the Right name should be here on Wikipedia. Suggestions from Other users are Most Welcomed. Thank You - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Image:Colombianfestivaluk.jpg
Hi I noticed the messgae you left on my user talk page, to be honest I don't know anything about status of images on Wikipedia besides the ones I obviously made myself. The user on Flickr said to me:
Hey,
No that would be no problem at all. Use as many as you would like. Let me know when you're done, would love to see it.
Phil.
Now I know this means I can use it, but I have no idea about the codes to input on Wikipedia, or wether it would be best to get him to email Wikipedia himself? Thanks t talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Wrong. The post that told the Rugby members where to go and how to vote (""Go to Talk:Crusaders and state ""Oppose"" followed by a reason. No consensus is a result we should aim for."") was posted on the 30th of January. The first oppose did not appear until the next day. So let's not try to sweep this under the rug, either. |SEND - OVER " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Qamishlo is historically kurdish not Syriac and Armenian
Syriac and Armenian came to Hassake and Qamishli during the last days of the ottoman empire. Qamishli is originally Kurds.Syriac and Armenian are newly arrived in Qamishli, 100 years ago there was virtually no Syriac and Armenian there. The land is historically kurds and has nothing to do with ""kurdistan"". ""Syriac expelled to Syria by Turkey during the first decades of the 20th century have found a home in Syria, these syriac settled in Qamishli, Derike and Hassake, these lands has NEVER been syriac. syriac are stealing Syriac/Syrian soil and falsifying history. Check all the ancient remainings in the area it is all kurds." | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
I've got to say: I spent all this time trying to follow the advice you gave me, but now I'm even more confused than ever! Look, I don't really need to post imges that badly, which is why I digress to bring up the more important subject.
The Powerpuff Girls episodes section needs articles for EACH individual episode. But the leader of updating the Cartoonnetwork articles is too lazy to consider the idea. So I need much help. I'd go at it alone but I don't know how to create valid articles linked to specific text.
It's would take too long for you to go into detail about the article creation and such. But if you could:
1. Create an article
2. fill it with little tidbits of exclusive information so it doesn't get deleted immediately or mark it with some sort of tag that says it will shortly be updated(by me((it doesn't have to say ""by me"" specifically but I WILL get to it as soon as you've created it and further fill it up until it is worthy of being called an article))).
The plot all comes together. The only thing I need is cooperation...that, and you MUST NOT tell treelo. He/she doesn't like me at.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Matrilineal descent section - confusing?
Can someone explain this more clearly? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Foot Fetishism page
Hello, you removed my addition to Foot Fetishism because I did not have sources to the living people. I am still new and confused about how to use the site, and don't know how to source my additions. If you could do so that would be great | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bill Daily
Bill Daily is the man. Expand this article heaps. 203.220.107.115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Unit Monster
Hello.
Please reinstate this page. You have no right to delete it after 5 minutes. I'm in the process of adding references to it. Don't be so quick to delete something of which you obviously know nothing about.
Bosox0578. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Personnaly, I wouldn't complain if VVVVV single-handedly reworked the article and actually made it better. I would complain, however, and I would accuse him of ""dominating it"", if, as usual, he reworked the article only in order to put his own views and theories into the article or if he adopted a non-encyclopedical style, only to start yet another edit-war if anyone dared to touch his holy contributions. I would complain if VVVVV tried again to threaten me to force me out of Wikipedia for ""standing in his way"" (ie respecting the ""No OR"" policy), and indeed, if VVVVV were to do that, I would consider it downgrading the article, and article ownership. Because that is what VVVVV is doing here. So he can touch whatever article he wants, but any violations of the rules will be reverted, and I'm tired of seeing him throw tantrums everywhere about ""people destroying his work"", when he's obviously determined to have his own way on WP and to ignore every existing guideline and policy, and to attack everyone reminding him that articles about Evangelion don't belong to him. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Many thanks for this. I have implemented all of your comments except the first. I ahve altered the explanation about 'values of solutions' to make it, I hope, clearer just what I mean. I have managed to alter the diagrams as you suggest using Inkscape which I downloaded a few days ago. I would welcome your help pages about this, as my first attempts at creating diagrams were unsuccessful - all the lines, text etc whihc I created came out in light grey rather than black even though I set it at black using the fill, so either I am doing something very stupid, or there is some setting which I am missing.
I am now going to make the page live.
Thanks again | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
That's funny. I thought that all input counted here on wikipedia, regardless of how long someone has been a member of the community? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
charge of unethical conduct
Jc37, at my talk page you wrote:
...Concerning ongoing disruption regarding the DRV of Erdros numbers. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked until the DRV discussion is closed. - ...
I take it that your opinion is that I am (to some significant extent) disrupting Wikipedia. These points:
Does the ongoing ANI (I haven't checked it yet) regarding canvassing, pertain? My sense is that the accusation there was satisfactorily answered, particularly by the opposing voters I was suppposed not to have notified. Will you be bringing a new ANI if I continue some particular activity (I'm not sure which, specifically), or will you block me summarily?
I would appreciate it if you would point to specifics of what constitutes my ""ongoing disruption"".
I take it that you do not consider the subjects of my initial complaint (unilaterally overturning a conspicuous consensus) or the consequent rhetoric (persistant and repetitive spamming of ""reasons"" which had all been addressed, persistant arguement ad hominem, and several insinuations that our responses are unethical or misleading, while the opposing rhetoric is self-evident) to be disruptive? Part of my defense to any accusation of campaigning would be to compile examples of the techniques of the opposition, so at least we could delineate what wiki considers unethical.
Thanks.
As noted above, I'm merely responding to others' concerns. I sincerely hope you take " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You support the president!?
Do you like the smell of tax money down the drain and dead people being killed for a lost cause. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
I've been a Wikipedian since 22 July, 2006, and an administrator since 19 November, 2007.
I am an architect and a native West Virginian. I'm old enough to remember when Wordstar on an amber screen was really cool, when a control key really controlled something, and I started working with AutoCAD at version 7/2.5. My current project is is the translation of architecture-related articles from the French Wikipedia to the English wiki.
Wow, real fucking great. You design buildings. Who gives a fuck, honestly. I swear, what is it with you people? You fuck around with your e-cocks by running around, reversing edits and whatnot. It's really starting to piss me off. Also, West Virginia is a shithole, sorry to tell you. I've driven through many times and was NOT impressed. Luckily faggots such as yourself live within its confines, which means I only have to encounter you on the Internet, but, I digress...
You also go out of your way to mention that you're, in essence, old. That's...great? Really, I'm impressed you've lived long enough to resort to reversing edits on the an Internet reference. Congrad-a-fucking-lations on that one.
I know I know, you're going to ban me. The ease of proxies makes your threats utterly worthless, although I know that won't stop you from trying, you miserable scum.
Good day to you, sir! | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Image:Blueeyespsyko.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Blueeyespsyko.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Really this isn't Your Edit
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beartooth_(band)&oldid;=638137449 73.193.195.69 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""Mine is the true revolutionary method. If the people of the empire refuse, as I believe they should refuse, to render military service - if they decline to pay taxes to support that instrument of violence, an army - the present system of government cannot stand."" - Tolstoy
RJ11, in the quote you gave, Tolstoy answered, ""No; he ought not voluntarily to pay taxes."" So he did support tax resistence. I think you have misunderstood the rest of the quote due to the non-standard use (or translation from Russian?) of the word ""resist."" (which is understandable, unless you'd read the book.) In ""The Kingdom..."" the word ""resist"" means the use of violence or evil. I.e. chapter 1 title: ""THE DOCTRINE OF NON-RESISTANCE TO EVIL BY FORCE..."". Then he quote William Lloyd Garrison and Ballou:
Q. Ought the word ""non-resistance"" to be taken in its widest sensethat is to say, as intending that we should not offer any resistance of any kind to evil?
A. No; it ought to be taken in the exact sense of our Saviour's teachingthat is, not repaying evil for evil. We ought to oppose evil by every righteous means in our power, but not by evil.
The quote you gave, RJ11, means that Tolstoy supports non-violent tax resistance, but not resistance such as mugging tax-collectors." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Wtf man, every edit made by me is blindly reverted by Olahus (he doesn't even care that he introduces Nazi apologia in the process). If this isn't harassment, nothing is. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
To erase a souce and to replace it with a ""fact tag"" is not to ""think an edit is helpful"". The only definition is ""vandalism"". ""Ninguém"" is a not a new user, he does know very well what he is doing in Wikipedia. He knows very well that I posted a source that gives the 3 million figure, and there was no reason to reverte my edit, unless he was trying to rise another disruption, as usual. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
.
Last chance, Im about to block you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
I've never quite known what to make of the ""pornographic actor""/""actor"" divide. For unique names, it's not too much of a hassle. I appreciate the point, but defining someone by something they did not do is pretty strange, and especially so to have a title that essentially says ""Erik Rhodes, who didn't get naked for money."" Why not just Erik Rhodes (actor, born 1906)? " | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
". BTW, are there women are actually considered feminists who against abortion? I put in ""pro-choice"" prior to feminist, but that seems redundant" | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I made fun of Anwar al-Awlaki? What's the big deal? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
. Instead of using and abusing administrator privilege I suggest that arbitration be called on | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exactly what's wrong with the article? We have covered almost all major milestones in Ajith's film career. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Felisa Rincon
Tony,
I just made a small edit in the Felisa Rincon de Gautier article. Please let me know if it works.
All best, Nelson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I am not the editor who added 53 unsupported statements. Cite before you click ""save"". " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I need help
I can't edit pages. What's going on? Every time I try, I get a pop-up saying that my network IP is blocked. I live in a hotel, could that have somehow caused this to happened? Can anyone help me, please? - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
To be completely honest that looks 10x as worse and just makes it 10x as confusing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
And btw, was referring to a user as ""them"" attempted gender neutral language? I advice you to use ""him or her"" in the future. " | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
with their origins in Europe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Where can we get a copy of this? 14:03, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a
Profit Charity Business Organization. Panic selling of peanuts ensue and brought about what is known as the Great Peanut Crisis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Welcome!
Hello, Updater0906, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Removing information over and over again from an article isn't vandalism? If so then I'll just cut out the parts of the site that I don't agree with as people have done to the infantry page.
This is my second account but only because I forgot the PW to ""Onlyashadow"" and the email is no longer in use, I am fine with using this one so no worries there.
www.freeinfantry.com <- Forums, links to DL, as well as obvious proof of it's existance. There should be no reason to have the freeinfantry information removed from the page is there? If there is please tell me.- " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Diacritics: Moving forward
I too have no very clear idea about how to word an RfC, other than that it should be in relation to specific proposed changes to the MOS and not something vaguer. I also think it's very important to keep to the issue of diacritical marks in the original orthography of the language, and not stray into either additional letters (like eth or thorn) or the use of diacritical marks in transcription/transliteration (like retaining accents when going from πότε to póte or marking long vowels by macrons in transliterating a number of languages, including Greek and Japanese). These are separate issues.
The problems, for me, are primarily in the first paragraph of WP:DIACRITICS, which is evasive, muddled and inconsistent:
– this is just evasion. Their use or non-use should be motivated, and hence should be encouraged or discouraged according to the strength of the motivation.
– this encouragement to count ""hits"" just results in muddled policy, apart from the problem of the weasel word ""general"". However, this bit seems clear that the ""modifications"" are to the same word, i.e. can be treated as stylistic modifications.
This seems to me not to be consistent with the sentence before: is ""the common name"" here supposed to be with or without the added diacritical marks? ""[V]ersions of word"" above should mean that ""the common "" is the same with or without the diacritical marks.
Is it possible to re-write this paragraph to achieve consensus? I don't know.
Agreed those are separate issuesAgreed the first quoted passage is evasive, but motivating use or avoidance of diacritics seems to be the sticking point. Did you have some particular direction in mind? My take has been that if reliable sources show that their use is normal for the names in question that they should be used here, except where particular subjects eschew them. E.g. for a baseball player named Eddie Sandoval we'd give him as Eddie Sándoval if some reliable sources did (it can't be based on a majority of English language sources, since majority of them ignore diacritics entirely, as a matter of editorial/publishing convenience). It's the same principle that we can cite a single source for Eddie's birth date and place even if most sources don't mention them. A fact does not have to be provided by every single source to be considered reliable. And it's not a matter of sources conflicting (analogous to giving two different birth dates); some giving only Sandoval without the diacritics is like some sources giving a birth year but not a full birth date; it is incomplete information, not conflicting information. On the other hand, if Eddie himself is quoted saying he doesn't use the diacritic that should be a trumping factor (unless WP totally ditches subject preference in all areas, which seems unlikely given the number of discussions going on to make more allowances for subject preference all over the place). This can apply to geography, too (Santa Fe, New Mexico is ""Santa Fe"" not ""Santa Fé"" despite the popularity of the diacritic in certain circles; the official name of both the city and the county are ""Santa Fe"" with no accent. People frequently cite WP:OFFICIALNAME as if it were a policy, but it's actually just an essay, it may not accurately reflect the nuances in cases like this, and people often cite it without actually understanding what it says to begin with (it's frequently misinterpreted as being against use of official names, when it's really only against using them when they're directly unhelpful to readers, while otherwise we would almost certainly use the official name)I'm not sure ""general"" in the second passage is actually a weasel word, rather than just lack of clarity. It's not clear if it means the predominant use in reliable sources generally, the predominant use in general-audience sources, or both. The inclusion of ""and reference works"" strongly suggests the former. Regardless, the ""hit-counting"" aspect is a problem because of the aforementioned facts that a) English-language sources tend to ignore diacritics for their own conven | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
HEY DOOSHBAG
seriously do you know the difference between britain and europe? do you know which nation invaded and colonisated australia in 1788??
grow a pair you lying twit and allow the edit to stand, you cowardly piece of human offal! | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
Sorry, I didn't know. I just used the rollback button which automatically reverts the edits the user who last edited the article without letting me read it. 120mm " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
", 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Dear QuackGuru, I am not following you. How did I find the article? Because I am interested in the subject, that's why. As you can see from the Talk page, I have been contributing to the article with respect to new sources that can be used in the article. Those have also received support from other editors. As you can see, I've been also requested for collaboration by other editor in order to develop the article further.
All the edits I have made in the articles have been briefly discussed at the article Talk page. It is actually you whose editing behaviour have been discussed at two articles already: Traditional Chinese medicine, and Chiropractic. For the latest edit you were referring to, it's been discussed at the Talk page. It seems it is three editors against one in that discussion.
Few words about your former editing behaviour. You have been banned earlier[] for edit warring the alternative medicine articles. Also, quite recently you have been warned by administrator EdJohnston for edit warring the very alternative medicine articles here: ,
as well as by another administrator, Tiptoety, here: . ""...Hi QuackGuru. Please consider this your only warning for edit warring... //// ...I'll also note that if you continue to edit war on Pseudoscience related articles, I will impose a 1RR restriction your account per the discretionary sanctions...""
It seems that user QuackGuru has taken this to WP:ANI already (18:48), even before noticing me about it (18:52). 19:26" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nope. I had copy and pasted what there was already in there and I focused on the House first. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Yes, unfortunately, what happened was what is called a WP:Close paraphrase, something that was present in some of the other rewrites I have reviewed those past days, but here to an extent where it was not directly fixable by myself.
I chose to remove the entire career section but still restore the rest because the lead + discography were building a viable stub, which BTW contains every single reference present at the time of the review. I'll be looking in the full copyvio version to see if there is anything else and port it back into the article when I have a moment.
As I expect will confirm, close paraphrasing is where copyright laws become really tough to comply with, and I sympathize with the difficulty this presents. Nonetheless, I cannot, for obvious reasons, restore the text of the career section, as any modification of that would constitute an unauthorized derivative. And of course, I appreciate that the fact that only admins can verify my statement makes it doubly difficult. That being said, I'd welcome a second look from Frank or MRG if this is desirable. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Images
Many, many more images under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license are available in this photostream if you guys need it, 1. NuMa Contrib | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hey, why don't you and Joe Buck go make sweet sweet love down by the fireside you flaming faggot. | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Ammonia
Hi, I have tagged your addition of 'ammonia' to List of Arabic loanwords in English as {{dubious}}, as neither the OED nor the articles Jābir ibn Hayyān or sal ammoniac give any support to your claim. (I didn't delete it outright as your edit history suggests that you are a responsible editor). Do you have a reference? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Stalker?
""Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not after you"" - Kurt Cobain, 1991.
No matter what I edit, you're there 30 seconds later to amend it. Regardless of the subject, you're there. Hanging around like a bad smell or like a spare 'un at a wedding. Could you take your shit-in-a-field impression elsewhere? Much obliged. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Dear Lord, take this away from him before he does any more damage! 94.2.68.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Deletion of File:Richard Alden Samuel McCroskey III mugshot.jpg
You also deleted the above linked image, only noting the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 November 12#File:Richard Alden Samuel McCroskey III mugshot.jpg. As the discussion only included comments by the nominator and me strongly disagreeing with the nomination, I'd appreciate hearing your reasoning for the deletion. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Re
So, I guess this is how you are biased against your enemies? Telling me not to be a troll, even when your own evolutionist buddies do the same. I am an uncivil person and I treat people the way they treat me. I do not regard your comment as fair or friendly (the stuck up way it was written), so I am not your friend. Do not warn me about nonsense issues, and spend your time at rather improving articles. Thank you. ► ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Yes, there is. At the end of the second paragraph of Study Tech would you add this reference, please. [http://www.studytechnology.org/ Official Study Tech] because that will present the official study tech first in the list of references and is appropriate to the statements in the article. If that is done then the first exterior link (which is that link) can be deleted. Thank you and is an outside point of view needed in an article, elsewhere? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::I believe you work for the correction department of wikipedia user policy investigators. I hope to participate undoubtedly on that issue regarding my alternative account. Carry on. Summon " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This is the greatest article on Wikipedia
The pictures are hilarious. I'm glad Wiki allows some form of comedy sometimes!! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
(This post conflicted with Obi's - posted at the same time. But we're saying essentially the same thing.) Okay, interesting question: this is certainly OR, and probably COI, but it is (as far as I understand the term ""emigrant"") TRUE. Do we leave in false information, just because it contravenes policy regarding OR? Isn't the point to figure out what's correct? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
March 2008 (UTC)
Actually, Paterson would not be the first blind governor in U.S. history. Bob Cowley Riley, who lost his left eye in World War II and later lost vision in his right eye, served 11 days as Governor of Arkansas in 1975. 68.174.27.152 13:22, 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Lede
I have a feeling that the ever-expanding lede is losing sight of the subject of the article itself. The last paragraph has been getting larger and larger for the last six months, to the point where the lede now spends more time describing the after-effects of the Act's repeal than it does on the Act itself. I haven't seen a better version of that paragraph since this edit in June. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LOL
I hope he does these things more often. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Um, yeah. I disagree. It sounds like you decided to bunt instead of actually, you know, come up with something that reflects reality. Your statement above is rather astounding - ""Since we can't call it the letter A, let's just call it letter B. Letter A does resemble letter B, you know."" Autonomy implies dependence. Kosovo is NOT dependent on Serbia. - " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Oh shut up Bong, your deleting for your fun god damnit 10:10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
article like this exist. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Your edit was important. It is true that I do not see and know negative parts of all things. Your edits are great! Talk + " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
List of the monarchs of the Kingdom of England | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
DELETION OR THEN MERGER
There must be verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability NRV.
WP:NOPAGE -notability is a very serious question here and the weak and non-scholarly material does not amount to a stand alone article. The article is a combination of some critic/red flagging of the criticism of the Frankfurt School theories labelled here as ""Conspiracy Theory"". Yes it can entertained that some claims & rumours are discussed on minor internet sites that amount to ""Conspiracy talk"", but it is no reason for a Wikipedia entry or let alone a stand alone Wikipedia article.
REASONS FOR DELETION ARE NUMEROUS AND VERY CONCRETE
WP:NPOV neutral point of view!
WP:OR -The term ""original research"" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist
WP:V - means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Where available, academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources, such as in history, medicine, and science.
WP:FRINGE -A theory that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article
WP:NOTOPINION -Opinion pieces, although some topics, particularly those concerning current affairs and politics, may stir passions and tempt people to ""climb soapboxes"".
WP:YESPOV -Avoid stating opinions as facts
WP:WEIGHT -Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources. For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and impartial, but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic. This is a concern especially in relation to recent events that may be in the news.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Keeping verifiability policy and the above mentioned discussion in mind, I have edited the article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'd be fine with that. My schedule should permit me to deal with an RFA right now as well. — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.