tcapelle/kaggle-toxic-annotated-filtered · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 6 5k	racial_origin int64 0 3	gender_sex int64 0 3	religion int64 0 3	ability int64 0 3	violence int64 0 3
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pipefitter. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ''''''''''talk "	0	0	0	0	0
Such a shambles would be funny if it were not for the pain of wasted effort.	0	0	0	0	0
" Then I retract my statement about ""enabling"" in the edit summary. However, there is significant evidence that the anon poster was Sanchez, as his petulant habit since his ban has been to ""snipe from cover,"" as it were. "	0	0	0	0	1
I'm not sure I'm making my point clear, so I'll try a different explanation: I feel that it is important that this page makes clear the difference between what the book actually says, and what people (hopefully reliable sources)say it means. Interpretations should not be mixed in with the synopsis or character profiles in such a way that they cannot be told apart. Even what Kesey himself said later about the book should be clearly differentiated from what the book itself actually says. In regard to wether I think the lifeguard has brain damage: The book certainly doesn't say so as it does in the case of Pete Bancini, so why leave the reader of this article the impression that it does? What would be wrong with just explaining that he's got cleatmarks on his forehead, and letting the reader reach his or her own conclusion? I am also well aware that I can edit the article, but I decided not to because I thought that some guy might object because he thought the things I changed were blatantly obvious. I just left these observations here for anyone who actually cares enough about the quality of this article to try and make the changes, and make them stick. Frankly, I don't.	0	0	0	0	0
" Les Roquettes Wikipedia is embedded in the current internet. maps.Google.com does not have Les Roquettes in its database. Indeed it finds five places named Les Roquettes in Normandy, but none of them could possibly have been """" as the article says. They all lie from 10 to 30 miles from the beach. Could someone with real knowledge find the location of Les Roquettes in maps.Google.com and put a link to it in the article? Thanks "	0	0	0	0	0
I cannot believe you actually from New Zealand. I receive your kind policing and spamming on my user:Acceptefag.	1	0	0	0	1
Well, I don't know what those arguments could have been but it is ridiculous to have such a colorful map for the introduction, no offense. That degree of detail must go somewhere else in the article. See the British Empire map, the Portuguese empire map, the French empire map, etcetera etcetera.	0	0	0	0	0
This one was just for kicks.	0	0	0	0	0
Original research and sythesis Sources that are not talking about omarashi cannot be included in this article. Pulling articles that you think are related, but do not specifically mention this topic is [[WP:OR\|original research and not allowed. 207.69.139.142	0	0	0	0	0
" And it looks like you've been gone for a month. Never mind, I guess. Şłџğģő "	0	0	0	0	0
" No its not me..Why are you like that? I really dont understand. I have no megalomania trying to fill in everywhere ""my photos"", on the contrary. I had some nice photos, and I thought they would be helpful to add them in some Greece related Wikipedia articles. I havent seen new photos lately (related to those articles) so I only try to help here. Why are you so negative?... "	0	0	0	0	0
" Ya. I have quite a few comments at PR, but most of them are Indian editors who have edited Hindu related articles. IMO, such reviewers address the comprehensive criterion. Reviewers like you are alien to the concept reflect readability, jargon issues. When the article will be on main page as a FA, it is a majority non-Hindu, non-Indian audience. The wait for your comments is worth it. If the PR closes, please comment on Talk:Ahalya. Waiting for your constructive criticism. Thanks a lot. Talk "	2	0	0	0	0
Watching my every move is harassment, maybe not according to wikipedia but it is still harassment. I am very new at wikipedia and I make mistakes and people like you are not very helpful and are extremely annoying by stalking me. Just leave me alone Gdo01, stop stalking me, stop talking to me (Unless I vandalize something), and just leave me alone. I did not know you could not have more than one account, big deal, I am only 16 and very new at wikipedia but I get it now, so will you just leave me alone? Please? It would be much appreciated. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007.	0	0	0	0	1
You being a meanie bum to me Why ( What did I do?!?!?!?!	0	0	0	0	0
" Hi Rholton. What I'm trying to do here is create a good article that contains all the information on these towns that is presently in stubs. All the stubs can then redirect to this article. If they weren't just stubs, but proper articles, then there wouldn't be a point. They are not about to become more than stubs though, as I created the stub on Euroa about a year ago and it's still a stub. If some become large articles then I can just have a link to them from this article. It can also link from ""list of victorian towns"" which names each town. By doing this you will now go to a large article instead of one stub, getting a better overview of the towns in victoria. I'm still working on it, and I hope that you will give me a chance to finish before doing anything like a VfD. Not that that would be necessary anyway, as you can redirect ""victorian towns"" to ""list of victorian towns"" if you don't want it to be kept. 15:12, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)"	0	0	0	0	0
Ow, well that explaines everthing! Would you mind explaining everyone exactly why you as a German speaker moved this article title back to its false title other than just because you saw my name?	1	0	0	0	0
Hey, sorry this thank-you is so delayed; I was out of town and mostly away from Wikipedia for the last week and a half. I see that you made those final updates to the David Harding article. Thank you very much for your help. I have no more requests for that page for the time being so I've closed the request edit tag. Cheers, (Talk · )	0	0	0	0	0
I don't think posting the truth is a personal attack. You don't like the truth?	0	0	0	0	0
Thanks for the tip buttmunch. I didn't do anything. I was showing someone that one can edit wikipedia. Who do you think you are? I saw all you contributions to wiki. great for you. its still not yours to tell others not to touch.	0	0	0	0	1
Answers: His name is Xigbar as the Ultimania ALPHA states and his original name was Braig.	0	0	0	0	0
I think being Youngest rated player and finishing 3rd in world school Championship are notable enough to keep this article. We can expand it by adding his national achievements. -Abhishikt	0	0	0	0	0
" No I don't see what you mean. There is no POV in the Article. If you want my POV here in the discussion page, then yes, I have a POV and the POV is that Regional Governments in Ontario are the most corrupt governments outside of the Third World and ANY politicial who supports them past, present, or future, is CORRUPT especially those in the Provincial Government level that keep them around so long and that includes members of all THREE political parties. CORRUPTION spans partisanship and it a completely personal matter. This is my POV but I do not put this in the Article. My Agenda is to publish truthfull information and if that goes against the PROPAGANDA of corrupt government so be it. You are free to add interesting information to balance good with bad if you can find anything GOOD to say about Regions in Ontario, which I doubt anyone can since they are only good for nothing but institutionalized form of corruption.Wiki BADASS Woo 2U "	0	0	0	0	1
Oh, you have done it so that makes it so important, we understand now.24.77.204.120	0	0	0	0	0
" Contact information ThHis is a message for User: [email protected] contact me at [email protected]. "	0	0	0	0	0
"====Regarding edits made during January 13 2009 (UTC)==== Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Capuchin monkey page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. Worship her "	0	0	0	0	0
Audi A4 Please stop editing the article, if editing, i will block you, you asshole. (talk • contributions)	0	0	0	0	1
I think the referenced page algebraic data type is a more standard definition than the one shown on this page. At the very least, someone should add a disambiguation page.	0	0	0	0	0
" TCM I'd just review the previous FACs....see if anything was not addressed. I don't remember the last copy edit that the League did on it because the talk page hasn't been updated since June 2010 with their mark. If it's been awhile, request another. I'd list every complaint that was not addressed (and by addressed I mean the editors scratched them out) on the talk page so that we can see what is left to do. Then go from there. (Contact me) "	0	0	0	0	0
Art-o-mat / Clark Whittington If you're going to do things like this then please at least copy the reference into the target article. And if you're intending to take these to AfD please follow the WP:BEFORE procedure and check for sources here first.	0	0	0	0	0
put another one of the brackets here	0	0	0	0	0
question about synergy sports technology profile I removed opinioned words from synergy sports technology profile. The company has been highlighted in the NYT, Newsday and CNET. Is there anything I can do to get the advertisement tag removed. Thanks for your help. Thearcadiannewspaper	0	0	0	0	0
" People who hate this article seem to really love the ""just delete it and start over"" argument. Scientists test null hypotheses like ""there is no difference between X and Y"" all the time. And when there is a statistically significant deviation from the null hypothesis, scientists are so bold as to say ""X is different from Y"". So, yes, social scientists can be so bold as to say that there are differences in treatment between blacks and whites, where all other things are equal. There's nothing wrong with stating those scientific conclusions in an encyclopedic article, especially when it's backed by multiple reliable sources. If people have a problem with those conclusions, they can cite criticisms of the studies, or cite other studies that refute those conclusions. "	1	0	0	0	0
Do you like Bread? Do you like Ice-Cream?	0	0	0	0	0
How do I report another user for doing the exact same thing as me which should have been picked up by User:Escape_Orbit ?	0	0	0	0	0
I am going to let someone else review your article so you don't get the idea that I am picking on you, but to put it for review now is way premature. You have no references. Everything that is in your reference list is what is called self-sourcing, in other words, related in some way to the subject of the article. YouTube is not a reliable source. See WP:RS. Wikipedia only publishes what others are writing about. If you have no newspaper or magazine articles about your band, it isn't notable enough for a Wikipedia article. It appears that your band has some potential, but I am sure you realize that playing in bars in San Diego is a looooooong way from the Grammys. Read WP:BAND, WP:GNG (which is the basic standard for inclusion in Wikipedia) and the above mentioned WP:RS. Then honestly think about whether or not you are wasting your time with this. Wikipedia is not the place to start trying to promote your band, and you are a long way away from an article from what you have and what I have seen on the internet. There is a huge backlog at AfC, so your article probably won't get reviewed for at least a week. Please take this for what it is, advice. I am not your enemy. I am just trying to get you to see what you are working with. Good Luck. I wish you all the success in the world. I have been around musicians all my life and I know it is a very difficult row to hoe. I hope you find your way down that long road. If you have any questions, you are welcome to message me on my talk page.	0	0	0	0	0
Addition of Wikilinks, as in to Epideictic Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions! Some links, if they are to irrelevant articles (another Jeffrey Walker) or to articles that will probably never exist (style without substance) are better not to make. For an idea of the more normal linking practice see and Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context.	0	0	0	0	0
I would like to transluce user:Jdaniels15/chuck to Wikipedia:Userboxes/Media/Television (shows)/Comedy. How do I do so?	0	0	0	0	0
" There is nothing unusual about being a musician and a businessman. More importantly, you don't need formal training to do either. MJ never went to school for music, acting or dancing and pleanty of wealthy business owners have no formal education. (of the Occult) "	0	0	0	0	0
" Another random member who doesn't even edit any of the New York City Subway articles, nor knows nothing about the New York City Subway itself. Yeah, thanks for your ""unnecessarily hostile"" comment at that sockpuppet's page. Sit down and watch how I myself edit. "	0	0	0	0	1
See also WP:OC/AWARD for an argument here.	0	0	0	0	0
It is impossible that the storyline took place in the 1950s and it is impossible that Colleen is born in the 1930s when Shawn, her younger brother, was born in the late 1920s.	0	0	0	0	0
" ""The pyroxene-rich rocks which result from the contact metamorphism of impure limestones are described as pyroxene hornfelses (calc-silicate hornfelses)."" The above statement sounds inaccurate, since pyroxenes in hornfels are the byproduct of metabasite and metapelite metamorphism. If a ""limestone"" was that siliceous with a large mafic component, it would no longer be a limestone but a shale."	0	0	0	0	0
I don't care, I'm only here trying to help. It's to the detriment of the articles' quality when you block me. Bye!	0	0	0	0	0
" Three phases of post-WWII relationships between Romania and the Soviet Union OK, I've done some research and I'm sure I still don't know as much as the rest of you but at least I am not as much of an ignoramus as I was a few hours ago. I've looked at a number of online resources, most of them non-scholarly, but I think it's enough to get a feel for what the situation is. The source that I found most useful is: this one. It's clear that there were at least three phases of relationship between Romania and the Soviet Union after WWII. The first was ""legal occupation"" between 1944 and 1946/47. As Hamish and Prete say, ""The occcupation lasted legally from the signature of the armistice until February 1947, when peace treaties were signed in Paris..."" The next phase of the relationship involves a nominally independent Romania that is ""closely aligned"" with the Soviet Union and COMECON. As for Soviet troops, Hamish and Prete say ""[after 1947], Soviet troops remained, but on a different legal basis, in Romania and Hungary. The official reason was that (the Soviets) needed to control communications between the Soviet Union and Soviet occupation forces in Austria. This reason disappeared with the conclusion of the Austrian State Treaty in 1955. Instead, Soviet forces remained as Allied troops, and their status was more precisely defined with the signature in 1958 of the Warsaw Pact."" Now, we know that the Soviet troops were pulled out of Romania in 1958 and that Ceausescu took Romania on a path that diverged from COMECON but still remained enough in Khruschev's good graces that Romania never suffered a military incursion as Hungary or Czechoslovakia did. The point here is that there are at least three phases of relationship between Romania and the Soviet Union. The relationship between 1944 and 1946/47 was clearly one of occupation. After 1958, everyone agrees that there was no more occupation of Romania. However, between 1946/47 and 1958, it's not clear what people call it. As Hamish and Prete state, the ""legal occupation"" ended. As cited here and in Soviet occupation of Romania, some sources state that the ""Soviet occupation"" ended in 1958. Others call it a ""virtual occupation"". Why virtual? Because it had all the earmarks of an occupation except that it wasn't officially one. (And thus my argument that we shouldn't call it an occupation because it wasn't one.) What's the solution? Here's my proposal... First, stop getting caught up in what the title of the article says. Let the Soviet occupation of Romania article remain where it is. Mention the entire period of 1944-1958 under this title (i.e. Soviet occupations) but make it clear that there were three phases of relationship and, as I described it, ""the period from 1946/47 to 1958 had many of the characteristics of an occupation but was not legally considered to be an occupation"". Also add that many historians follow the lead of the Romanian government in calling the entire period from 1944-1958 an occupation by the Soviet Union. However, also note that it is unclear whether this characterization is used by ""most historians"", ""many historians"" or ""some historians"". In Soviet occupation of Romania, the text says ""most Western historians"" but the references simply provide a handful of sources that use the word ""occupation"" to refer to the period 1944-1958. As someone argued, this could be just cherry-picking. To support the assertion that ""most Western historians consider the period 1944-1958 to be a Soviet occupation"", you have to find a source that says exactly that i.e. the text has to say ""most Western historians blah, blah, blah"". Failing that, using the word ""most"" is OR. Much better to say ""many"" or just ""some"". "	0	0	0	0	0
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ziggurat. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "	0	0	0	0	1
Question about RFA Why do you waste so much time at RFA? Nothing ever changes there.	0	0	0	0	0
Please stop abusing the word hopefully! Ignorant Americans! Now go fix it! Americans are so stupid.	3	0	0	0	2
BigK HeX, please keep your petty taunts out of my User talk page. The are beneath me, even as they are clearly not beneath you. (Why on Earth do you feel to compelled to come into my talkpage at all?)	0	0	0	0	1
Thanks - sorry, I misunderstood how signatures worked. Hopefully I worked it out now - thanks for the tip	0	0	0	0	0
" Whisperer in the Dark Isn't the proffessor from ""The Whisperer in the Dark"" mentioned in this? It's been a while since of read it, but if so, it ought be included under the section on connections to his other works. "	0	0	0	0	0
" I apologize, but my point remains Hi. I apologize for calling you rude. But i think my point remains, if a word or a specific form of a word is rarely used it becomes ""obscure"" or ""archaic"". Believe it or not, language is defined by the majority of speakers who live in the present day. ""Formulae"" is a particular variant of ""formulas"" that has fallen out of favor, or common usage. Now since Wikipedia is a ""current"" encyclopedia, I don't understand why you feel the necessity to use language from the 1800s. How do I put this delicately... nobody uses this word anymore. Why dont you start an 1800s encyclopedia, and you can use all the various archaic English words. I would like to appeal this decision if that is possible. Thankyou"	0	0	0	0	0
I am rather busy at the moment, but good luck with the nomination! \| talk	0	0	0	0	0
Effective arguments at AfD in general, should be positive. Just state the policy and hope the other people will show good sense as well. I try use caution in criticising other's arguments, though sometimes I admit I am less cautious than I should be when I feel really frustrated. And gaining respect for one's opinions there can be b best obtained by contributing to a range of topics, not just those of personal interest, and discussing a range of policy questions, not just WP:NOT. Just some friendly advice from someone who tends to feel the same way you do. ''''''	0	0	0	0	0
" Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia 2 This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. All editors on Macedonia-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions and Geopolitical ethnic and religious conflicts noticeboard (WP:ECCN), especially since there are significant problems in reaching consensus. All articles related to Macedonia (defined as any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to Macedonia, Macedonia nationalism, Greece related articles that mention Macedonia, and other articles in which how Macedonia will be referred to is an issue) fall under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned. Editors enforcing a case where a binding Stalemate resolution has been found are exempt from 1RR. The following users have been banned from Wikipedia one year, one year, and six months . The following users have been topic-banned from Macedonia-related articles and their talk pages, as defined in All related articles under 1RR: indefinitely, indefinitely, one year and, one year. The Committee takes note that has resigned his administrator status while this case was pending, but also notes that he is desysopped as a result of the above case. ChrisO may obtain the tools back via the usual means or by request to the Arbitration Committee. is strongly admonished for displaying a long pattern of incivil, rude, offensive, and insulting behavior towards other editors and failure to address the community's concerns in this regard. Because of this Future Perfect at Sunrise is subject to an editing restriction for one year, and is desysopped for three months as a consequence of poor user conduct and misuse of administrative tools. After three months, his administrator access will be automatically restored. Single-purpose accounts are strongly advised to edit in accordance with WP:SPA and other Wikipedia policies. Diversifying one's topics of interest is also encouraged. Abuse filter 119, as currently configured, logs all changes involving the word ""Macedonia"" but does not block any edits. The community is strongly advised to consider adding a new abuse filter criterion; any instances of changing the word ""Macedonia"" to ""FYROM"" (the five-letter acronym, not the full phrase) shall be prevented. Within seven days of the closure of this case, a discussion is to be opened to consider the preferred current and historical names for the four entities known as Macedonia. The discussion will end one month after it is opened. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, talk Discuss this"	0	0	0	0	0
Thanks. If you wouldn't mind, please self-revert your last revert on that article, so there is no apprentice of an edit war. 208.81.184.4	0	0	0	0	0
" Is this how Wikipedia treats contributors? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:166.82.205.115&diff;=537122923&oldid;=537087991 ""Hello, ""Erik,"" or whatever your name is. Now, if you are done whining like a little bitch, please either kindly contribute to the encylopedia at hand, or GTFO. What do you think this is, Twitter? Oh, and the next time you are hanging around that cult-like website you control, can you do me a favor and tell that ""Kohai"" to go fuck herself? Same goes for KCO and CorriJean and the rest of that gang of patzer trolls you have sucking your dick. Welcome to Wikipedia, Brah! OGBranniff (talk) "" Wikipedia needs to start setting some guidelines and enforcing them. This behavior is unacceptable and explains why Wikipedia is continuing to decline."	0	3	0	0	2
(Clarification: I just think it'd be good to have the hook fact be more explicitly cited in the article—no big thing.)	0	0	0	0	0
Thanks! I’ve asked Sasata and Rlendog whether “Predator avoidance” is open. One thing though…around this time is the holidays, so around Christmas I won’t be as active, since I have stuff to do. I’ll try to keep editing though. Cheers, The Arbiter★★★	0	0	0	0	0
Thanks! Thank you	0	0	0	0	0
" Users? You mean editors. And yes, there are above, but editors like myself have come into this, and all we see is the noise about ""Yes POV"" ""No POV"" ""Yes POV"" ""No POV"" ""I'm getting an Admin wahhhhhh"" etc. etc. So your arguments are lost in the self generated noise. If you didn't get distracted, offered clearly articulated proposals, then discussions can be had. And yes, perhaps ""the other guy started it"" but if it means that your edit isn't carried, then your proposal is rather in vain? "	0	0	0	0	0
Kiss My Ass, You Uppity Nigger	3	0	0	0	2
", 7 June 2012 (UTC) I would like to reposta updated version my comment from the discussion above before this one was also started (making 3 sections with the same discussion): I agree with Saturn the tally should only look at the present. Right now I can count 7 in the thre section on this talkpage for keeping the established consensus for now (option B), that is NextUSprez, William S. Saturn, 68.58.63.22, JayJasper, Ariostos and myself. And I can count 5 in the thre sections on this talkpage for chancing it now (Any other option), that is Rollins83, Tyrol15, Virilk, 99.165.226.1 and Belibaste. Without taking a vote I also see a consensus about restarting this discussion when the election is over. Not trying to stop anyone for speaking and discussing more, I am looking forward to hear new good arguments, but my suggestion to the consensus would be (The wording migt be a bit wrong): The Photos of Obama and Romney ""campaigning"" (B) stays until November 6, 2012. At that time a new consensus should be made, the suggestion from this Quorum would be to then use two more presidentiel photos as in the example C/E. 21:20"	0	0	0	0	0
. In other words, it did NOT HAVE to be taken out	0	0	0	0	0
" WW2 casualties I think some more narrative prose is a good idea. The main tables should still be there for easy lookup, but the topic is complex, often controversial, and different sources have different numbers. And all this could/should be elaborated on and explained in the article, yes. Many people will come to the page with numbers on their ""own"" country that they have learned or read, and we should have some text explaining more thorowly what the numbers we list include. And that's probably best done outside tables and in addition to just simple footnotes. Maybe we could also have separate casuality sections for the different (major) countries, with text and tables where there could be made room for lower and upper bounds on numbers and space for citing different sources and their numbers. Not so much that I expect you to find and look up every different estimate, but there are many people editing and there could be a value in having room for those comming here later with different sources to add to the information. I don't know. But I really like your work so far. It was about time that we got some well-sourced numbers in this article. Well done! "	0	0	0	0	0
Welcome= Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!	0	0	0	0	0
" Oh, since you probably want ""proof"": (contribs) "	0	0	0	0	0
Progressive Metal is Progressive Metal. You dont redefine names based on bands you do and do not like. Also, you have just been etremely Neoglistic. Alternative Metal is basically the forepart of Nu Metal, before its name changed and before the new batch of bands that got high critical acclaim. I also suggest you read the article on what Nu Metal is, and what Alternative Rock is. Not all Nu Metal bands are out to make money, many Nu Metal bands have made no money, and im sure you wouldnt know any of them.	0	0	0	0	0
There is more biographical information in SF Chronicle, maybe someone would like to update the article.	0	0	0	0	0
" WikiProjects interested in ""Militant Atheism"" Could you please explain more about why you have recently removed several WikiProjects mentioned as being interested in the article ""Militant atheism""? The article discusses issues which clearly involve Christianity, and other religions, so I think they could be restored. "	0	0	1	0	0
If this turns out to be a hoax, #redirect Pascal programming language.	0	0	0	0	0
" SPANIARDS ARE NOT WHITE?? OH LORD 51% euro/black and 46% black,that is 46% afro decent and 51% afro-mixed decent,that makes it neutral, becuase Mulatto is a separate racial group, they view themselves different from the Blacks. Now, if you have a problem with that, which you certainly have, then that don't belong in this article. It is an accurate description of DR demographics, and CCNY-DS,KNOWS IT, and WILL agree and cooperate. You can go and take your radical afrocentrism to Maulana Karenga. and example is the demographics that show about El Salvador in wiki, it says "" 90% mestizo,9% white,1% indian"". In my personal opinion, Indian might be more percentage, some mestizos might look "" more indian than 50/50 or 40/60. Since Mestizos DUE view themselves different from Indians, why don't you go and invade the article and type "" 91% of Salvadoreans are of amerindian decent"". 90% amerindian-mixed population "" doesn't equate to "" amerinidan decent"". that just creates confusion. So if other articles of latin american countries can word it like that? why not DR?? platanogenius"	2	0	0	0	1
" Confused Don't worry but I think somebody got confused while usign LHD and RHD back and forth beetwen different countries, so for example, Spain is LHD or RHD? the part about Gibraltar made me get confused about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.226.204.140 Gibraltar has not been part of Spain since 1713, so the British authorities applied their own laws, including the rule of the road. By 1929, driving on on the left while having a land border with a country that drove on the right became impractical, so that's why Gibraltar change on 16 June of that year. History Do we have any reliable evidence about the historic foundations of LHD/RHD are? I think the article could benefit from adding any info to this effect. On numerous occasions, I have heard that left hand driving has its roots in knights passing each other with the lances in their right hand. However, i have never been able to find any evidence of this. -Please do excuse me for sounding a bit daft, but I'm not sure I understand the question. Isn't that what the entire article is about? In addition, I think the problems ascertaining the specific history are quite well-presented. Sweden Under Safety factors it says ""Research in 1969 by J. J. Leeming showed countries driving on the left have a lower collision rate than countries driving on the right. This research is questioned in Peter Kincaid's book on the rule of the road,[citation needed] but some countries that have switched to driving on the right, such as Sweden, have seen their long-term accident rates increase by more than any increase in traffic volume[citation needed]."" The red part is totally made up, and the opposite is the truth. The number of accidents was cut in half from the first day of right hand driving, and has not increased substantually since then. Swedish right hand driver 83.255.35.43 H'm. This what you're saying doesn't quite make sense, either. The number of crashes will surely have gone up since 1967. Perhaps you mean the crash rate (per vehicle-kilometre travelled, per thousand vehicles registered, etc.) has declined, which would make sense since that's what's been happening in just about every first-world country over the last four decades. Nevertheless, the assertion you call attention to is unsupported, has been for quite some time, and at the very least is questionable. We can remove it from the article unless/until someone cares to add it back with reliable support. — T·C Dagen H videos If anyone else has found this already and beaten me to it, I'm sorry to be redundant. After a long night of trolling the internet for hours I finally came across the holy grail of Dagen H-related video. Here's the link. It's from TV Sveriges. That link will take you to the live television coverage from 4.45am to 5.15am. There's yet another clip from 5.15-5.30 and further clips down the right-hand menu to different reports throughout Sweden at different intervals throughout the day. It chronicles the entire switch in immense detail, though be warned that the dialogue is entirely in Swedish (as is the website) so its main function is simply for those of us who draw immense excitement from watching these events transpire. The site also hosts (further down) the news bulletins for the various anniversaries right up to 1997. Again, if this has been posted before, I'm sorry, but for those of you who haven't seen this before, happy viewing. Unfortunately, it's been removed. Thanks anyway. On the Norwegian language version of the article, I came across this link to Swedish TV coverage - [http://svt	0	0	0	0	0
you win for now but ill guarantee you i will win the war and ill have the last laugh. you think you win but you dont win nothing you idiot.	0	0	0	0	1
My RFA My RfA Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again,	0	0	0	0	0
spam Please do not spam my talk page again with regard to AFD. I neither need nor appreciate yours or anyone else's thanks or solicitations on this or any other AFD. If you must thank me again, a personally tailored note would be less tacky than a template; that extra bit of effort shows that you actually mean it. Derex	0	0	0	0	1
" The picture is an example of the POV it represents; as such, it is perfectly appropriate. Please stop deleting it. As for the allegations of Roed-Larsen, why do imagine that they were based on the IDF spokesman's claim, as opposed to the many claims of massacre from Palestinians weeks earlier. On April 4, Secretary-General of the Palestinian Authority, Ahmed Abdel Rahman, complained in an interview on Palestinian television about “…world silence over the massacres being perpetrated against the Palestinian people.” (BBC Worldwide Monitoring). On April 6, Nabil Sha'ath delivered a speech at a meeting of the Arab League, in which he charged that “a 'massacre' was underway in the Palestinian refugee camp of Jenin.” (Deutsche Presse-Agentur) He also “compared Israeli actions in the West Bank towns of Jenin and Nablus to the 1982 massacres of hundreds of Palestinans…” (The Associated Press). On April 7, Abdel Rahman told NBC’s Tim Russert, “The victims so far has been over 250 Palestinians killed, many of them are children and women.” Saeb Erekat is quoted by Washington Post as having said “This is not fighting between armies, but a massacre in Jenin camp."" Why do you think that the IDF spokesman's statements from over a week later were so influential, as opposed to these many public statements by Palestinian spokesmen which were widely disseminated in major news outlets? (talk) 00:07, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)"	0	0	0	0	1
" It certainly does seem odd, Guettarda, but I think we're talking in the wind here. I don't see Mr. Milburn as being willing to discuss this issue any further. Perhaps we can look at this as a tacit admission of culpability. dissera! "	0	0	0	0	0
China Lee Lee's sister, China (Margaret) Lee, was the first Asian-American Playmate as well as a film actress. I added this notation and inserted a link to her Wikipedia entry as well.	0	0	0	0	0
"I want to inform you about the admin User:InShaneee ""This is your only warning. Continue to add this picture to articles and you will be blocked. InShaneee "" This admin has treaten me showing no reason why should I have to remove this photo. "	0	0	0	0	1
"==ED O'Loughlin== I saw nothing on my talk page from you. The Wiki software is not user friendly.Certainly it is confusing. By what logic can you just cancel an application to reconsider a deletion without providing proper specific reasons? ""Speedy denial!"" Merely to rebound a comment that the application is in bad faith is not good enough. I refuse to grovel to You or to Wikipedia. Be sure this is not a game of ""snakes and ladders"". There may be outside avenues to address this form of engineed censorship. Certainly, if thee is no proper consideration of my claims and by that I mean evidence how the conduct of the debate on ""Ed O""Loughlin"" deletion was conducted appropriately or otherwise there will be further problems for Wikipedia arising out of this matter. Many Thanks, 124.191.88.235 "	0	0	0	0	1
Besides, I sent you an email because you said Paid wikipedia editing requires specialized writing. I only desired to learn about that. That's why I asked for your help. Thanks	0	0	0	0	0
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Balance sheet. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!	0	0	0	0	0
I think zines are important too . Enough to be there . I really idealistically wish the picture wasn't so large . what do you think . It currently can't be resized , I don't think . what do you feel .	0	0	0	0	0
They all believe that all men think that there superior.	0	2	0	0	0
" I agree that to warrant an article, a collected sequence of games between a particular set of teams has to amount to more than just - I don't know, two teams that have been in the same conference a long time. None of these seem particularly noteworthy, though I can't claim any deep knowledge of these schools. Do you have a particular definition of ""rivalry"" in mind, or is it just the sense (which I share) that whatever it is, these aren't that? I would weigh in on any AfD you might file, as I just did above, but they'd go more smoothly if there were something more objective to point to! "	0	0	0	0	0
REDIRECT Talk:Sangeet Natak Akademi Award	0	0	0	0	0
" What do you call this then? ""You are not competent enough to try to attempt to settle these issues. Your failure to show neutrality beyond doubts has not been resolved until now."" Calling someone incompetent for what they tried to do in order to fix this mess reeks of ad hominem if you ask me. "	0	0	0	2	0
it dosnt matter what he said he obviously havnt been reading the forums the characters have a chance now	0	0	0	0	0
Sarujo Sarujo just listen, MAD is on Season 2. The magazine confirmed it. Do you have the issue? It clearly states MAD is on Season 2. They had a fold-in about Season 2.	0	0	0	0	0
Unblock 70.121.33.78	0	0	0	0	0
" There are no guarantees, but there are ways of dramatically reducing the likelihood of a mother passing the virus on to her children. As our article states, ""where combination antiretroviral drug treatment and Cesarian section are available, [the] risk [of transmission] can be reduced to as low as one percent."" Obviously only a physician would be able to prescribe that drug or arrange for the C-section, and so the woman would have contact her physician as soon as she knows she's pregnant. - "	0	1	0	0	0
Sweet. Thanks again for the welcome and the advice.	0	0	0	0	0
To FUXOFT - I am surprised the busy admins here have not caught your name yet- seems questionable to me. Maybe try StonedinEurope or something. Anyways, do not try to convince these people of the truth - as you say, the mistake is there, hopefully it can be fixed before release, but the one that played this weekend in LA, last week in NYC, and in Australia and Korea mistakenly calls the tank Devastator. This is only in a subtitle not verbal. Anyways, don't let the name callers here upset you.	0	0	0	0	0
" This is a perennially tiresome request that has received stern responseshere and []. In short; ""not going to happen"". "	0	0	0	0	0
" Are you seriously fact-checking a comedy movie? Btw, the stats are correct. 24% is about the average overhead for private insurance companies, while Medicare has around a 3% overhead. For the private insurance companies, it's not just ""for services,"" but for things such as CEO pay and advertising."	0	0	0	0	0
This list is WAY harder to understand compared to the original page. This page relists useless information over and over again causing clutter, thus makig the page harder to understand. There are also no real references and numorous erros and false info. For exapmle the Reasons for Departures section make it seem the members of the back up band were at some point offical members of the band. Also there has never been any offical talk from Korn concerning Zac Baird and Shane Gibson becoming offical members of Korn. To improve the page, the table should be removed and any lists including Jonathan, Fieldy, Munky, David and Head should be removed considering they are not members of the back up band.	0	0	0	0	0
Method featured on TV series The simple synthesis which VampWillow protested above can readily be found from the information in her complaint by one familiar with the User Contributions tab, and is apparently not illegal since it can still be accessed. I was surprised to hear all three chemicals from it named in Revolution (Law & Order: Criminal Intent). Not even broadcast TV is censoring this synthesis!	0	0	0	0	0
" Keep honorary members. Collect is laboring under the misapprehension that a third party observer writing in a reliable source is somehow guilty of violating Wikipedia's guidelines for WP:PRIMARY sources. Of course we accept WP:SECONDARY sources which use primary materials, whatever they may be. The third party observer examines the primary material and passes on to the reader any information judged relevant. Below I have listed some reliable WP:SECONDARY sources. Domhoff writes ""Writers Bret Harte and Mark Twain were made honorary members."" Shoumatoff writes that ""Honorary member Richard Nixon, meanwhile, called it 'the most faggy goddamned thing you could ever imagine.'"" Shoumatoff also lists Mark Twain as a member. Parry, Albert. Garrets and Pretenders: A History of Bohemianism in America. New York: Covici, Friede, 1933. On page 219 Parry writes that Bret Harte and Mark Twain were made honorary members of the Bohemian Club. ""Early Artists of the Bohemian Club: San Francisco as the Center of West Coast Art "", Resource Library Magazine. ""Mark Twain and Bret Harte were honorary members..."" Ben Tarnoff writes in The Bohemians: Mark Twain and the San Francisco Writers Who Reinvented American Literature, page 185, that Ina Coolbrith was ""elected"" to the position of honorary member. LaRouchite Brian Lantz writes in Executive Intelligence Report November 1982, ""Bohemian Grove, Jack London, and the cultishness of California's politics"", ""Mark Twain was made an honorary member in 1873; Theodore Roosevelt was made an honorary member in 1903."" Stephen J. Mexal writes in Reading for Liberalism: The Overland Monthly and the Writing of the Modern American West, page 249, that ""In recent years former secretary of state Henry Kissinger, former president George H. W. Bush, and former defense Donald Rumsfeld have all become members or honorary members."""	0	1	0	0	0
Just for the record, we have discussed imdb before and decided it isn't a reliable source. For example... -	0	0	0	0	0
Financial formula wrong The formula given for most profitable corporation (ratio of profits over revenues) is incorrect. Under that formula, stores like Walmart and Costco that have low markups would not be on the top of the list (whereas a vitamin supplement dealer with a 90% markup would be higher despite the total absolute revenues or profit). This definition just makes the article silly, and it should be corrected.	0	0	0	0	0

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pipefitter. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ''''''''''talk "

0

Such a shambles would be funny if it were not for the pain of wasted effort.

0

" Then I retract my statement about ""enabling"" in the edit summary. However, there is significant evidence that the anon poster was Sanchez, as his petulant habit since his ban has been to ""snipe from cover,"" as it were. "

0

1

I'm not sure I'm making my point clear, so I'll try a different explanation: I feel that it is important that this page makes clear the difference between what the book actually says, and what people (hopefully reliable sources)say it means. Interpretations should not be mixed in with the synopsis or character profiles in such a way that they cannot be told apart. Even what Kesey himself said later about the book should be clearly differentiated from what the book itself actually says. In regard to wether I think the lifeguard has brain damage: The book certainly doesn't say so as it does in the case of Pete Bancini, so why leave the reader of this article the impression that it does? What would be wrong with just explaining that he's got cleatmarks on his forehead, and letting the reader reach his or her own conclusion? I am also well aware that I can edit the article, but I decided not to because I thought that some guy might object because he thought the things I changed were blatantly obvious. I just left these observations here for anyone who actually cares enough about the quality of this article to try and make the changes, and make them stick. Frankly, I don't.

0

" Les Roquettes Wikipedia is embedded in the current internet. maps.Google.com does not have Les Roquettes in its database. Indeed it finds five places named Les Roquettes in Normandy, but none of them could possibly have been """" as the article says. They all lie from 10 to 30 miles from the beach. Could someone with real knowledge find the location of Les Roquettes in maps.Google.com and put a link to it in the article? Thanks "

0

I cannot believe you actually from New Zealand. I receive your kind policing and spamming on my user:Acceptefag.

1

0

1

Well, I don't know what those arguments could have been but it is ridiculous to have such a colorful map for the introduction, no offense. That degree of detail must go somewhere else in the article. See the British Empire map, the Portuguese empire map, the French empire map, etcetera etcetera.

0

This one was just for kicks.

0

Original research and sythesis Sources that are not talking about omarashi cannot be included in this article. Pulling articles that you think are related, but do not specifically mention this topic is [[WP:OR|original research and not allowed. 207.69.139.142

0

" And it looks like you've been gone for a month. Never mind, I guess. Şłџğģő "

0

" No its not me..Why are you like that? I really dont understand. I have no megalomania trying to fill in everywhere ""my photos"", on the contrary. I had some nice photos, and I thought they would be helpful to add them in some Greece related Wikipedia articles. I havent seen new photos lately (related to those articles) so I only try to help here. Why are you so negative?... "

0

" Ya. I have quite a few comments at PR, but most of them are Indian editors who have edited Hindu related articles. IMO, such reviewers address the comprehensive criterion. Reviewers like you are alien to the concept reflect readability, jargon issues. When the article will be on main page as a FA, it is a majority non-Hindu, non-Indian audience. The wait for your comments is worth it. If the PR closes, please comment on Talk:Ahalya. Waiting for your constructive criticism. Thanks a lot. Talk "

2

0

Watching my every move is harassment, maybe not according to wikipedia but it is still harassment. I am very new at wikipedia and I make mistakes and people like you are not very helpful and are extremely annoying by stalking me. Just leave me alone Gdo01, stop stalking me, stop talking to me (Unless I vandalize something), and just leave me alone. I did not know you could not have more than one account, big deal, I am only 16 and very new at wikipedia but I get it now, so will you just leave me alone? Please? It would be much appreciated. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007.

0

1

You being a meanie bum to me Why ( What did I do?!?!?!?!

0

" Hi Rholton. What I'm trying to do here is create a good article that contains all the information on these towns that is presently in stubs. All the stubs can then redirect to this article. If they weren't just stubs, but proper articles, then there wouldn't be a point. They are not about to become more than stubs though, as I created the stub on Euroa about a year ago and it's still a stub. If some become large articles then I can just have a link to them from this article. It can also link from ""list of victorian towns"" which names each town. By doing this you will now go to a large article instead of one stub, getting a better overview of the towns in victoria. I'm still working on it, and I hope that you will give me a chance to finish before doing anything like a VfD. Not that that would be necessary anyway, as you can redirect ""victorian towns"" to ""list of victorian towns"" if you don't want it to be kept. 15:12, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)"

0

Ow, well that explaines everthing! Would you mind explaining everyone exactly why you as a German speaker moved this article title back to its false title other than just because you saw my name?

1

0

Hey, sorry this thank-you is so delayed; I was out of town and mostly away from Wikipedia for the last week and a half. I see that you made those final updates to the David Harding article. Thank you very much for your help. I have no more requests for that page for the time being so I've closed the request edit tag. Cheers, (Talk · )

0

I don't think posting the truth is a personal attack. You don't like the truth?

0

Thanks for the tip buttmunch. I didn't do anything. I was showing someone that one can edit wikipedia. Who do you think you are? I saw all you contributions to wiki. great for you. its still not yours to tell others not to touch.

0

1

Answers: His name is Xigbar as the Ultimania ALPHA states and his original name was Braig.

0

I think being Youngest rated player and finishing 3rd in world school Championship are notable enough to keep this article. We can expand it by adding his national achievements. -Abhishikt

0

" No I don't see what you mean. There is no POV in the Article. If you want my POV here in the discussion page, then yes, I have a POV and the POV is that Regional Governments in Ontario are the most corrupt governments outside of the Third World and ANY politicial who supports them past, present, or future, is CORRUPT especially those in the Provincial Government level that keep them around so long and that includes members of all THREE political parties. CORRUPTION spans partisanship and it a completely personal matter. This is my POV but I do not put this in the Article. My Agenda is to publish truthfull information and if that goes against the PROPAGANDA of corrupt government so be it. You are free to add interesting information to balance good with bad if you can find anything GOOD to say about Regions in Ontario, which I doubt anyone can since they are only good for nothing but institutionalized form of corruption.Wiki BADASS Woo 2U "

0

1

Oh, you have done it so that makes it so important, we understand now.24.77.204.120

0

" Contact information ThHis is a message for User: [email protected] contact me at [email protected]. "

0

"====Regarding edits made during January 13 2009 (UTC)==== Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Capuchin monkey page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. Worship her "

0

Audi A4 Please stop editing the article, if editing, i will block you, you asshole. (talk • contributions)

0

1

I think the referenced page algebraic data type is a more standard definition than the one shown on this page. At the very least, someone should add a disambiguation page.

0

" TCM I'd just review the previous FACs....see if anything was not addressed. I don't remember the last copy edit that the League did on it because the talk page hasn't been updated since June 2010 with their mark. If it's been awhile, request another. I'd list every complaint that was not addressed (and by addressed I mean the editors scratched them out) on the talk page so that we can see what is left to do. Then go from there. (Contact me) "

0

Art-o-mat / Clark Whittington If you're going to do things like this then please at least copy the reference into the target article. And if you're intending to take these to AfD please follow the WP:BEFORE procedure and check for sources here first.

0

put another one of the brackets here

0

question about synergy sports technology profile I removed opinioned words from synergy sports technology profile. The company has been highlighted in the NYT, Newsday and CNET. Is there anything I can do to get the advertisement tag removed. Thanks for your help. Thearcadiannewspaper

0

" People who hate this article seem to really love the ""just delete it and start over"" argument. Scientists test null hypotheses like ""there is no difference between X and Y"" all the time. And when there is a statistically significant deviation from the null hypothesis, scientists are so bold as to say ""X is different from Y"". So, yes, social scientists can be so bold as to say that there are differences in treatment between blacks and whites, where all other things are equal. There's nothing wrong with stating those scientific conclusions in an encyclopedic article, especially when it's backed by multiple reliable sources. If people have a problem with those conclusions, they can cite criticisms of the studies, or cite other studies that refute those conclusions. "

1

0

Do you like Bread? Do you like Ice-Cream?

0

How do I report another user for doing the exact same thing as me which should have been picked up by User:Escape_Orbit ?

0

I am going to let someone else review your article so you don't get the idea that I am picking on you, but to put it for review now is way premature. You have no references. Everything that is in your reference list is what is called self-sourcing, in other words, related in some way to the subject of the article. YouTube is not a reliable source. See WP:RS. Wikipedia only publishes what others are writing about. If you have no newspaper or magazine articles about your band, it isn't notable enough for a Wikipedia article. It appears that your band has some potential, but I am sure you realize that playing in bars in San Diego is a looooooong way from the Grammys. Read WP:BAND, WP:GNG (which is the basic standard for inclusion in Wikipedia) and the above mentioned WP:RS. Then honestly think about whether or not you are wasting your time with this. Wikipedia is not the place to start trying to promote your band, and you are a long way away from an article from what you have and what I have seen on the internet. There is a huge backlog at AfC, so your article probably won't get reviewed for at least a week. Please take this for what it is, advice. I am not your enemy. I am just trying to get you to see what you are working with. Good Luck. I wish you all the success in the world. I have been around musicians all my life and I know it is a very difficult row to hoe. I hope you find your way down that long road. If you have any questions, you are welcome to message me on my talk page.

0

Addition of Wikilinks, as in to Epideictic Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions! Some links, if they are to irrelevant articles (another Jeffrey Walker) or to articles that will probably never exist (style without substance) are better not to make. For an idea of the more normal linking practice see and Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context.

0

I would like to transluce user:Jdaniels15/chuck to Wikipedia:Userboxes/Media/Television (shows)/Comedy. How do I do so?

0

" There is nothing unusual about being a musician and a businessman. More importantly, you don't need formal training to do either. MJ never went to school for music, acting or dancing and pleanty of wealthy business owners have no formal education. (of the Occult) "

0

" Another random member who doesn't even edit any of the New York City Subway articles, nor knows nothing about the New York City Subway itself. Yeah, thanks for your ""unnecessarily hostile"" comment at that sockpuppet's page. Sit down and watch how I myself edit. "

0

1

See also WP:OC/AWARD for an argument here.

0

It is impossible that the storyline took place in the 1950s and it is impossible that Colleen is born in the 1930s when Shawn, her younger brother, was born in the late 1920s.

0

" ""The pyroxene-rich rocks which result from the contact metamorphism of impure limestones are described as pyroxene hornfelses (calc-silicate hornfelses)."" The above statement sounds inaccurate, since pyroxenes in hornfels are the byproduct of metabasite and metapelite metamorphism. If a ""limestone"" was that siliceous with a large mafic component, it would no longer be a limestone but a shale."

0

I don't care, I'm only here trying to help. It's to the detriment of the articles' quality when you block me. Bye!

0

" Three phases of post-WWII relationships between Romania and the Soviet Union OK, I've done some research and I'm sure I still don't know as much as the rest of you but at least I am not as much of an ignoramus as I was a few hours ago. I've looked at a number of online resources, most of them non-scholarly, but I think it's enough to get a feel for what the situation is. The source that I found most useful is: this one. It's clear that there were at least three phases of relationship between Romania and the Soviet Union after WWII. The first was ""legal occupation"" between 1944 and 1946/47. As Hamish and Prete say, ""The occcupation lasted legally from the signature of the armistice until February 1947, when peace treaties were signed in Paris..."" The next phase of the relationship involves a nominally independent Romania that is ""closely aligned"" with the Soviet Union and COMECON. As for Soviet troops, Hamish and Prete say ""[after 1947], Soviet troops remained, but on a different legal basis, in Romania and Hungary. The official reason was that (the Soviets) needed to control communications between the Soviet Union and Soviet occupation forces in Austria. This reason disappeared with the conclusion of the Austrian State Treaty in 1955. Instead, Soviet forces remained as Allied troops, and their status was more precisely defined with the signature in 1958 of the Warsaw Pact."" Now, we know that the Soviet troops were pulled out of Romania in 1958 and that Ceausescu took Romania on a path that diverged from COMECON but still remained enough in Khruschev's good graces that Romania never suffered a military incursion as Hungary or Czechoslovakia did. The point here is that there are at least three phases of relationship between Romania and the Soviet Union. The relationship between 1944 and 1946/47 was clearly one of occupation. After 1958, everyone agrees that there was no more occupation of Romania. However, between 1946/47 and 1958, it's not clear what people call it. As Hamish and Prete state, the ""legal occupation"" ended. As cited here and in Soviet occupation of Romania, some sources state that the ""Soviet occupation"" ended in 1958. Others call it a ""virtual occupation"". Why virtual? Because it had all the earmarks of an occupation except that it wasn't officially one. (And thus my argument that we shouldn't call it an occupation because it wasn't one.) What's the solution? Here's my proposal... First, stop getting caught up in what the title of the article says. Let the Soviet occupation of Romania article remain where it is. Mention the entire period of 1944-1958 under this title (i.e. Soviet occupations) but make it clear that there were three phases of relationship and, as I described it, ""the period from 1946/47 to 1958 had many of the characteristics of an occupation but was not legally considered to be an occupation"". Also add that many historians follow the lead of the Romanian government in calling the entire period from 1944-1958 an occupation by the Soviet Union. However, also note that it is unclear whether this characterization is used by ""most historians"", ""many historians"" or ""some historians"". In Soviet occupation of Romania, the text says ""most Western historians"" but the references simply provide a handful of sources that use the word ""occupation"" to refer to the period 1944-1958. As someone argued, this could be just cherry-picking. To support the assertion that ""most Western historians consider the period 1944-1958 to be a Soviet occupation"", you have to find a source that says exactly that i.e. the text has to say ""most Western historians blah, blah, blah"". Failing that, using the word ""most"" is OR. Much better to say ""many"" or just ""some"". "

0

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ziggurat. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "

0

1

Question about RFA Why do you waste so much time at RFA? Nothing ever changes there.

0

Please stop abusing the word hopefully! Ignorant Americans! Now go fix it! Americans are so stupid.

3

0

2

BigK HeX, please keep your petty taunts out of my User talk page. The are beneath me, even as they are clearly not beneath you. (Why on Earth do you feel to compelled to come into my talkpage at all?)

0

1

Thanks - sorry, I misunderstood how signatures worked. Hopefully I worked it out now - thanks for the tip

0

" Whisperer in the Dark Isn't the proffessor from ""The Whisperer in the Dark"" mentioned in this? It's been a while since of read it, but if so, it ought be included under the section on connections to his other works. "

0

" I apologize, but my point remains Hi. I apologize for calling you rude. But i think my point remains, if a word or a specific form of a word is rarely used it becomes ""obscure"" or ""archaic"". Believe it or not, language is defined by the majority of speakers who live in the present day. ""Formulae"" is a particular variant of ""formulas"" that has fallen out of favor, or common usage. Now since Wikipedia is a ""current"" encyclopedia, I don't understand why you feel the necessity to use language from the 1800s. How do I put this delicately... nobody uses this word anymore. Why dont you start an 1800s encyclopedia, and you can use all the various archaic English words. I would like to appeal this decision if that is possible. Thankyou"

0

I am rather busy at the moment, but good luck with the nomination! | talk

0

Effective arguments at AfD in general, should be positive. Just state the policy and hope the other people will show good sense as well. I try use caution in criticising other's arguments, though sometimes I admit I am less cautious than I should be when I feel really frustrated. And gaining respect for one's opinions there can be b best obtained by contributing to a range of topics, not just those of personal interest, and discussing a range of policy questions, not just WP:NOT. Just some friendly advice from someone who tends to feel the same way you do. ''''''

0

" Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia 2 This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. All editors on Macedonia-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions and Geopolitical ethnic and religious conflicts noticeboard (WP:ECCN), especially since there are significant problems in reaching consensus. All articles related to Macedonia (defined as any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to Macedonia, Macedonia nationalism, Greece related articles that mention Macedonia, and other articles in which how Macedonia will be referred to is an issue) fall under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned. Editors enforcing a case where a binding Stalemate resolution has been found are exempt from 1RR. The following users have been banned from Wikipedia one year, one year, and six months . The following users have been topic-banned from Macedonia-related articles and their talk pages, as defined in All related articles under 1RR: indefinitely, indefinitely, one year and, one year. The Committee takes note that has resigned his administrator status while this case was pending, but also notes that he is desysopped as a result of the above case. ChrisO may obtain the tools back via the usual means or by request to the Arbitration Committee. is strongly admonished for displaying a long pattern of incivil, rude, offensive, and insulting behavior towards other editors and failure to address the community's concerns in this regard. Because of this Future Perfect at Sunrise is subject to an editing restriction for one year, and is desysopped for three months as a consequence of poor user conduct and misuse of administrative tools. After three months, his administrator access will be automatically restored. Single-purpose accounts are strongly advised to edit in accordance with WP:SPA and other Wikipedia policies. Diversifying one's topics of interest is also encouraged. Abuse filter 119, as currently configured, logs all changes involving the word ""Macedonia"" but does not block any edits. The community is strongly advised to consider adding a new abuse filter criterion; any instances of changing the word ""Macedonia"" to ""FYROM"" (the five-letter acronym, not the full phrase) shall be prevented. Within seven days of the closure of this case, a discussion is to be opened to consider the preferred current and historical names for the four entities known as Macedonia. The discussion will end one month after it is opened. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, talk Discuss this"

0

Thanks. If you wouldn't mind, please self-revert your last revert on that article, so there is no apprentice of an edit war. 208.81.184.4

0

" Is this how Wikipedia treats contributors? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:166.82.205.115&diff;=537122923&oldid;=537087991 ""Hello, ""Erik,"" or whatever your name is. Now, if you are done whining like a little bitch, please either kindly contribute to the encylopedia at hand, or GTFO. What do you think this is, Twitter? Oh, and the next time you are hanging around that cult-like website you control, can you do me a favor and tell that ""Kohai"" to go fuck herself? Same goes for KCO and CorriJean and the rest of that gang of patzer trolls you have sucking your dick. Welcome to Wikipedia, Brah! OGBranniff (talk) "" Wikipedia needs to start setting some guidelines and enforcing them. This behavior is unacceptable and explains why Wikipedia is continuing to decline."

0

3

0

2

(Clarification: I just think it'd be good to have the hook fact be more explicitly cited in the article—no big thing.)

0

Thanks! I’ve asked Sasata and Rlendog whether “Predator avoidance” is open. One thing though…around this time is the holidays, so around Christmas I won’t be as active, since I have stuff to do. I’ll try to keep editing though. Cheers, The Arbiter★★★

0

Thanks! Thank you

0

" Users? You mean editors. And yes, there are above, but editors like myself have come into this, and all we see is the noise about ""Yes POV"" ""No POV"" ""Yes POV"" ""No POV"" ""I'm getting an Admin wahhhhhh"" etc. etc. So your arguments are lost in the self generated noise. If you didn't get distracted, offered clearly articulated proposals, then discussions can be had. And yes, perhaps ""the other guy started it"" but if it means that your edit isn't carried, then your proposal is rather in vain? "

0

Kiss My Ass, You Uppity Nigger

3

0

2

", 7 June 2012 (UTC) I would like to reposta updated version my comment from the discussion above before this one was also started (making 3 sections with the same discussion): I agree with Saturn the tally should only look at the present. Right now I can count 7 in the thre section on this talkpage for keeping the established consensus for now (option B), that is NextUSprez, William S. Saturn, 68.58.63.22, JayJasper, Ariostos and myself. And I can count 5 in the thre sections on this talkpage for chancing it now (Any other option), that is Rollins83, Tyrol15, Virilk, 99.165.226.1 and Belibaste. Without taking a vote I also see a consensus about restarting this discussion when the election is over. Not trying to stop anyone for speaking and discussing more, I am looking forward to hear new good arguments, but my suggestion to the consensus would be (The wording migt be a bit wrong): The Photos of Obama and Romney ""campaigning"" (B) stays until November 6, 2012. At that time a new consensus should be made, the suggestion from this Quorum would be to then use two more presidentiel photos as in the example C/E. 21:20"

0

. In other words, it did NOT HAVE to be taken out

0

" WW2 casualties I think some more narrative prose is a good idea. The main tables should still be there for easy lookup, but the topic is complex, often controversial, and different sources have different numbers. And all this could/should be elaborated on and explained in the article, yes. Many people will come to the page with numbers on their ""own"" country that they have learned or read, and we should have some text explaining more thorowly what the numbers we list include. And that's probably best done outside tables and in addition to just simple footnotes. Maybe we could also have separate casuality sections for the different (major) countries, with text and tables where there could be made room for lower and upper bounds on numbers and space for citing different sources and their numbers. Not so much that I expect you to find and look up every different estimate, but there are many people editing and there could be a value in having room for those comming here later with different sources to add to the information. I don't know. But I really like your work so far. It was about time that we got some well-sourced numbers in this article. Well done! "

0

Welcome= Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

0

" Oh, since you probably want ""proof"": (contribs) "

0

Progressive Metal is Progressive Metal. You dont redefine names based on bands you do and do not like. Also, you have just been etremely Neoglistic. Alternative Metal is basically the forepart of Nu Metal, before its name changed and before the new batch of bands that got high critical acclaim. I also suggest you read the article on what Nu Metal is, and what Alternative Rock is. Not all Nu Metal bands are out to make money, many Nu Metal bands have made no money, and im sure you wouldnt know any of them.

0

There is more biographical information in SF Chronicle, maybe someone would like to update the article.

0

" WikiProjects interested in ""Militant Atheism"" Could you please explain more about why you have recently removed several WikiProjects mentioned as being interested in the article ""Militant atheism""? The article discusses issues which clearly involve Christianity, and other religions, so I think they could be restored. "

0

1

0

If this turns out to be a hoax, #redirect Pascal programming language.

0

" SPANIARDS ARE NOT WHITE?? OH LORD 51% euro/black and 46% black,that is 46% afro decent and 51% afro-mixed decent,that makes it neutral, becuase Mulatto is a separate racial group, they view themselves different from the Blacks. Now, if you have a problem with that, which you certainly have, then that don't belong in this article. It is an accurate description of DR demographics, and CCNY-DS,KNOWS IT, and WILL agree and cooperate. You can go and take your radical afrocentrism to Maulana Karenga. and example is the demographics that show about El Salvador in wiki, it says "" 90% mestizo,9% white,1% indian"". In my personal opinion, Indian might be more percentage, some mestizos might look "" more indian than 50/50 or 40/60. Since Mestizos DUE view themselves different from Indians, why don't you go and invade the article and type "" 91% of Salvadoreans are of amerindian decent"". 90% amerindian-mixed population "" doesn't equate to "" amerinidan decent"". that just creates confusion. So if other articles of latin american countries can word it like that? why not DR?? platanogenius"

2

0

1

" Confused Don't worry but I think somebody got confused while usign LHD and RHD back and forth beetwen different countries, so for example, Spain is LHD or RHD? the part about Gibraltar made me get confused about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.226.204.140 Gibraltar has not been part of Spain since 1713, so the British authorities applied their own laws, including the rule of the road. By 1929, driving on on the left while having a land border with a country that drove on the right became impractical, so that's why Gibraltar change on 16 June of that year. History Do we have any reliable evidence about the historic foundations of LHD/RHD are? I think the article could benefit from adding any info to this effect. On numerous occasions, I have heard that left hand driving has its roots in knights passing each other with the lances in their right hand. However, i have never been able to find any evidence of this. -Please do excuse me for sounding a bit daft, but I'm not sure I understand the question. Isn't that what the entire article is about? In addition, I think the problems ascertaining the specific history are quite well-presented. Sweden Under Safety factors it says ""Research in 1969 by J. J. Leeming showed countries driving on the left have a lower collision rate than countries driving on the right. This research is questioned in Peter Kincaid's book on the rule of the road,[citation needed] but some countries that have switched to driving on the right, such as Sweden, have seen their long-term accident rates increase by more than any increase in traffic volume[citation needed]."" The red part is totally made up, and the opposite is the truth. The number of accidents was cut in half from the first day of right hand driving, and has not increased substantually since then. Swedish right hand driver 83.255.35.43 H'm. This what you're saying doesn't quite make sense, either. The number of crashes will surely have gone up since 1967. Perhaps you mean the crash rate (per vehicle-kilometre travelled, per thousand vehicles registered, etc.) has declined, which would make sense since that's what's been happening in just about every first-world country over the last four decades. Nevertheless, the assertion you call attention to is unsupported, has been for quite some time, and at the very least is questionable. We can remove it from the article unless/until someone cares to add it back with reliable support. — T·C Dagen H videos If anyone else has found this already and beaten me to it, I'm sorry to be redundant. After a long night of trolling the internet for hours I finally came across the holy grail of Dagen H-related video. Here's the link. It's from TV Sveriges. That link will take you to the live television coverage from 4.45am to 5.15am. There's yet another clip from 5.15-5.30 and further clips down the right-hand menu to different reports throughout Sweden at different intervals throughout the day. It chronicles the entire switch in immense detail, though be warned that the dialogue is entirely in Swedish (as is the website) so its main function is simply for those of us who draw immense excitement from watching these events transpire. The site also hosts (further down) the news bulletins for the various anniversaries right up to 1997. Again, if this has been posted before, I'm sorry, but for those of you who haven't seen this before, happy viewing. Unfortunately, it's been removed. Thanks anyway. On the Norwegian language version of the article, I came across this link to Swedish TV coverage - [http://svt

0

you win for now but ill guarantee you i will win the war and ill have the last laugh. you think you win but you dont win nothing you idiot.

0

1

My RFA My RfA Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again,

0

spam Please do not spam my talk page again with regard to AFD. I neither need nor appreciate yours or anyone else's thanks or solicitations on this or any other AFD. If you must thank me again, a personally tailored note would be less tacky than a template; that extra bit of effort shows that you actually mean it. Derex

0

1

" The picture is an example of the POV it represents; as such, it is perfectly appropriate. Please stop deleting it. As for the allegations of Roed-Larsen, why do imagine that they were based on the IDF spokesman's claim, as opposed to the many claims of massacre from Palestinians weeks earlier. On April 4, Secretary-General of the Palestinian Authority, Ahmed Abdel Rahman, complained in an interview on Palestinian television about “…world silence over the massacres being perpetrated against the Palestinian people.” (BBC Worldwide Monitoring). On April 6, Nabil Sha'ath delivered a speech at a meeting of the Arab League, in which he charged that “a 'massacre' was underway in the Palestinian refugee camp of Jenin.” (Deutsche Presse-Agentur) He also “compared Israeli actions in the West Bank towns of Jenin and Nablus to the 1982 massacres of hundreds of Palestinans…” (The Associated Press). On April 7, Abdel Rahman told NBC’s Tim Russert, “The victims so far has been over 250 Palestinians killed, many of them are children and women.” Saeb Erekat is quoted by Washington Post as having said “This is not fighting between armies, but a massacre in Jenin camp."" Why do you think that the IDF spokesman's statements from over a week later were so influential, as opposed to these many public statements by Palestinian spokesmen which were widely disseminated in major news outlets? (talk) 00:07, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)"

0

1

" It certainly does seem odd, Guettarda, but I think we're talking in the wind here. I don't see Mr. Milburn as being willing to discuss this issue any further. Perhaps we can look at this as a tacit admission of culpability. dissera! "

0

China Lee Lee's sister, China (Margaret) Lee, was the first Asian-American Playmate as well as a film actress. I added this notation and inserted a link to her Wikipedia entry as well.

0

"I want to inform you about the admin User:InShaneee ""This is your only warning. Continue to add this picture to articles and you will be blocked. InShaneee "" This admin has treaten me showing no reason why should I have to remove this photo. "

0

1

"==ED O'Loughlin== I saw nothing on my talk page from you. The Wiki software is not user friendly.Certainly it is confusing. By what logic can you just cancel an application to reconsider a deletion without providing proper specific reasons? ""Speedy denial!"" Merely to rebound a comment that the application is in bad faith is not good enough. I refuse to grovel to You or to Wikipedia. Be sure this is not a game of ""snakes and ladders"". There may be outside avenues to address this form of engineed censorship. Certainly, if thee is no proper consideration of my claims and by that I mean evidence how the conduct of the debate on ""Ed O""Loughlin"" deletion was conducted appropriately or otherwise there will be further problems for Wikipedia arising out of this matter. Many Thanks, 124.191.88.235 "

0

1

Besides, I sent you an email because you said Paid wikipedia editing requires specialized writing. I only desired to learn about that. That's why I asked for your help. Thanks

0

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Balance sheet. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

0

I think zines are important too . Enough to be there . I really idealistically wish the picture wasn't so large . what do you think . It currently can't be resized , I don't think . what do you feel .

0

They all believe that all men think that there superior.

0

2

0

" I agree that to warrant an article, a collected sequence of games between a particular set of teams has to amount to more than just - I don't know, two teams that have been in the same conference a long time. None of these seem particularly noteworthy, though I can't claim any deep knowledge of these schools. Do you have a particular definition of ""rivalry"" in mind, or is it just the sense (which I share) that whatever it is, these aren't that? I would weigh in on any AfD you might file, as I just did above, but they'd go more smoothly if there were something more objective to point to! "

0

REDIRECT Talk:Sangeet Natak Akademi Award

0

" What do you call this then? ""You are not competent enough to try to attempt to settle these issues. Your failure to show neutrality beyond doubts has not been resolved until now."" Calling someone incompetent for what they tried to do in order to fix this mess reeks of ad hominem if you ask me. "

0

2

0

it dosnt matter what he said he obviously havnt been reading the forums the characters have a chance now

0

Sarujo Sarujo just listen, MAD is on Season 2. The magazine confirmed it. Do you have the issue? It clearly states MAD is on Season 2. They had a fold-in about Season 2.

0

Unblock 70.121.33.78

0

" There are no guarantees, but there are ways of dramatically reducing the likelihood of a mother passing the virus on to her children. As our article states, ""where combination antiretroviral drug treatment and Cesarian section are available, [the] risk [of transmission] can be reduced to as low as one percent."" Obviously only a physician would be able to prescribe that drug or arrange for the C-section, and so the woman would have contact her physician as soon as she knows she's pregnant. - "

0

1

0

Sweet. Thanks again for the welcome and the advice.

0

To FUXOFT - I am surprised the busy admins here have not caught your name yet- seems questionable to me. Maybe try StonedinEurope or something. Anyways, do not try to convince these people of the truth - as you say, the mistake is there, hopefully it can be fixed before release, but the one that played this weekend in LA, last week in NYC, and in Australia and Korea mistakenly calls the tank Devastator. This is only in a subtitle not verbal. Anyways, don't let the name callers here upset you.

0

" This is a perennially tiresome request that has received stern responseshere and []. In short; ""not going to happen"". "

0

" Are you seriously fact-checking a comedy movie? Btw, the stats are correct. 24% is about the average overhead for private insurance companies, while Medicare has around a 3% overhead. For the private insurance companies, it's not just ""for services,"" but for things such as CEO pay and advertising."

0

This list is WAY harder to understand compared to the original page. This page relists useless information over and over again causing clutter, thus makig the page harder to understand. There are also no real references and numorous erros and false info. For exapmle the Reasons for Departures section make it seem the members of the back up band were at some point offical members of the band. Also there has never been any offical talk from Korn concerning Zac Baird and Shane Gibson becoming offical members of Korn. To improve the page, the table should be removed and any lists including Jonathan, Fieldy, Munky, David and Head should be removed considering they are not members of the back up band.

0

Method featured on TV series The simple synthesis which VampWillow protested above can readily be found from the information in her complaint by one familiar with the User Contributions tab, and is apparently not illegal since it can still be accessed. I was surprised to hear all three chemicals from it named in Revolution (Law & Order: Criminal Intent). Not even broadcast TV is censoring this synthesis!

0

" Keep honorary members. Collect is laboring under the misapprehension that a third party observer writing in a reliable source is somehow guilty of violating Wikipedia's guidelines for WP:PRIMARY sources. Of course we accept WP:SECONDARY sources which use primary materials, whatever they may be. The third party observer examines the primary material and passes on to the reader any information judged relevant. Below I have listed some reliable WP:SECONDARY sources. Domhoff writes ""Writers Bret Harte and Mark Twain were made honorary members."" Shoumatoff writes that ""Honorary member Richard Nixon, meanwhile, called it 'the most faggy goddamned thing you could ever imagine.'"" Shoumatoff also lists Mark Twain as a member. Parry, Albert. Garrets and Pretenders: A History of Bohemianism in America. New York: Covici, Friede, 1933. On page 219 Parry writes that Bret Harte and Mark Twain were made honorary members of the Bohemian Club. ""Early Artists of the Bohemian Club: San Francisco as the Center of West Coast Art "", Resource Library Magazine. ""Mark Twain and Bret Harte were honorary members..."" Ben Tarnoff writes in The Bohemians: Mark Twain and the San Francisco Writers Who Reinvented American Literature, page 185, that Ina Coolbrith was ""elected"" to the position of honorary member. LaRouchite Brian Lantz writes in Executive Intelligence Report November 1982, ""Bohemian Grove, Jack London, and the cultishness of California's politics"", ""Mark Twain was made an honorary member in 1873; Theodore Roosevelt was made an honorary member in 1903."" Stephen J. Mexal writes in Reading for Liberalism: The Overland Monthly and the Writing of the Modern American West, page 249, that ""In recent years former secretary of state Henry Kissinger, former president George H. W. Bush, and former defense Donald Rumsfeld have all become members or honorary members."""

0

1

0

Just for the record, we have discussed imdb before and decided it isn't a reliable source. For example... -

0

Financial formula wrong The formula given for most profitable corporation (ratio of profits over revenues) is incorrect. Under that formula, stores like Walmart and Costco that have low markups would not be on the top of the list (whereas a vitamin supplement dealer with a 90% markup would be higher despite the total absolute revenues or profit). This definition just makes the article silly, and it should be corrected.

0