tcapelle/kaggle-toxic-annotated-filtered · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 6 5k	racial_origin int64 0 3	gender_sex int64 0 3	religion int64 0 3	ability int64 0 3	violence int64 0 3
Clearly this user has compromised his own vanity page by editing it, no? You have to agree with that?	0	0	0	0	0
Geographic overview Getting: Error creating thumbnail: Invalid thumbnail parameters @ Image:Map of Kansas City.png. Anyone else getting this?	0	0	0	0	0
The pattern again, you attack then post wiki bannners LOL	0	0	0	0	1
I've made comments on the article talk page - ironically, if it wasn't for the warring, this would be close to WP:GA	0	0	0	0	0
An example of how to strike out code:text struck through will look like this: text struck through	0	0	0	0	0
"Interested party comment. Firstly Justin is not correct when he says he was standardising members of Category:Lists of songs by authors or performers, there are List of cover versions of XXXX, List of songs written by XXXX, List of songs with lyrics by XXXX (Justin actually moved one to this this week!), List of cover versions of XXXX, List of singles by XXXX List of unreleased XXXX songs, List of xxxx songs, List of songs by XXXX. List of songs recorded bv XXXX, amongst others. Taken with ""songs written by, then the written/recorded by would have been the majority! If Justin had started amongst those single individualistic titles he would have had my blessing! All the Leona Lewis move does, and several others (but not necessarily all) is to ignore the content and subject matter of the article and to move according to where one person thinks WP wants it. I have placed a requested move on the Leona Lewis list and several others and opposed Justin's requests for moves where appropriate. I have also moved a couple of lists that state ""List of songs recorded by"" to where they belong. For what it's worth, I have always preferred 'Songs recorded by' as it is specific, easily understandable and eliminates entries for one live performance on a wet Wednesday in Wichita (ie non-notable). List of Richhoncho songs could mean what's on my ipod today! "	0	0	0	0	0
I have tried to adress that problem now, and I think it works quite well except that it has a premature ending. Who is to get the final word, and what would it be?	0	0	0	0	0
" ""Unsigned"", The Defender of Al Lineage It seems that 'unsigned', the coward doen't want to come out and counter the truth with what is apparently his thinly-veiled defense of Rev.Al""s very immediate connection to strom Thurmond. Just goes to show, as actor Jack Nicholson's iconic stement ""YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!"" Once Again: How else do you think he is related? Strom Thurmond himself has raped many a littele, underaged and defensive black gal, as did his ancestor(s) raped one, or several of Al's enslved female ancestors!!! However, given Thurmonds's age, circumscribing nearly THREE CENTURIES, he probably raped several succesive generations of Al's women-folk. Yet another ""creative"" version of willful southern ""inbreeding"" When Sharpton became publically known outside NYC (he was for decades earlier in the FBI's files, of which I suspect that Thurmond knew of him before then, given his special access to govenment files,) the old piking fart-child-rapist must have howled with satanic laughter that the descendant of one of his ""bastard whelps"" became a black activist. (And before you, or anyone else start with the infantile objections, all this is in the public record, just a click and a scroll away!!! Added to this, know that the alphabet soup of US, ""unratified"" federal police agencies have colullded with southern and mid-western (Mornmon) ancester-tracking organizations; indeed , many of the former overlap with the feds. Just as the WASPs across the Pond has ever done since the Domesday Book. Rebuttal, anyone? Remeber, It's all in the public record for all to see. See? 24.46.103.28 Veryverser Omitted Items F.Y.I: THIS LITTLE TID-BIT IS ALSO NOT GOING TO DISAPPEAR JUST BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR AMORAL CRONIESTRY TO HIDE AND DEFEND CREATURES LIKE THIS ONE. Wasn't there, in an earlier version of this article a statement that Al Sharpton-when a youth-was first introduced to street politics and organizing by THE REVOLUTIONARY YOUTH MOVEMENT (RYM)? As I recalled, the RYM was an arm of the U.S. Labor Party headed by Lyndon Larouche. Interesting that Larouche who years ago was involved in NYC politics through his proxy cnadidates running for local office right into the 80s never mentioned Sharpton, or his affiliation with RYM. It is also curious how the media, even African American journalists failed to mention that the original arbitors of the forced eviction efforts of Freddies was its landords, a black Pentacostal Church!!!??? Nothing of this was ever mentioned by the press. And Sharpton never gave a clue to the public. Amazing. So, it is true the allegations of Sharpton being and agent provocateur. There are more inconsistancies, like his perfidy of the United African Movement and betrayal of Alton Maddox. Now, Rev. Al is cozy with Obama and the New York County District Attorney's office? (NO MATTER HOW HARD YOU TRY, IT'S NEVER GOING TO GO AWAY!!!) Veryverser On the ""Freddie's Mart"" Controversey Reliable sources that also include this very article collaborating info I and many others have received concerning the case of Freddie's Mart's landlord who was never cited by Sharpton! As for Rev. Al's perfidy concerning the UAM and Alton Maddox, who it must be strenuously reiterated rescued Alfred from the wrath of Morganthau, the New York State Attorney's office again and again! As for the statement of Sharpton's affiliation with Larouche (aka Lyn Marcus's) ""Revolutionary Youth Movement"", although I heard that the former had been involved in the mid-70s with a predomiately African-American youth movement in NYC, I didn't know the name of it until an earlier version of this very same article stated the name of it. (That earlier iteration is to all purposes now ommitted from viewing unless the author decides to put these item back in. I also noticed that there are many facts added to the present article; others understandbly taken out.) Rev. Al doesn't make reference to this affiliation in any detail in his auto-bio, but that is the nature and restriction of such tomes: What is not said is left for others to investigate. What his involvement with RYM is something that the Good Reverend, the F.B.I. as well as other police agencies scrutinizing Al for the past 35-yrs, LaRouche, some of the surviving members of RYM to attest. Yes, I agree with you that this is information warfare, by any other name. when has it not ever been? Veryverser"	3	2	0	0	3
" Message Hey Coolrunner87, you tedious little shit. Why don't you just grow a pair and stop wasting everyone's time with your whiny posturing about ""vandalism""? Fact is, RD Reynolds is a vile mound of goo and puss and is undeserving of a wikipedia entry. Maybe you should go and start an ""IWC wiki"" or some suchlike, and put all your overweight friends in there? Wikipedia is supposed to be about serious issues like politics, science, geography etc, not some morbidly obese basement dweller who makes up crap about professional wrestling! His books have no sources and contain more errors per page than there are zits on your face. "	0	2	0	1	2
Gilmore Girls I'm trying to figure out a few things when adding Season 7 and Complete Series. I somehow added an extra square and don't know how to undo it and I'm still trying to figure out background colours. Can you take a look and tell me how I can fix it? I don't want you to fix it until I give it a shot. Thanks	0	0	0	0	0
" I have not issued any ""threat"" nor would I ever do that ! I have been blocked unfairly . My contention is with Cynefin: it is a pseudoscientific model posing as a reality-based model. When Nobel Laureats have no reached a consensus on ""complex systems"" with non sentient items like particles; there is ""no way in heaven"" that ""Professor"" David Snowden has reached a viable conclusion. Wiki is not a place for pseudoscience and where there is such, then it must be balanced with criticism. chuck "	0	0	0	0	0
" Jimbo... I hope you'll take this as it's meantthat is, without too much rancorbut I think it's time for you to put up or shut up. I think the problem that (at least some) people are having with your issues with Eric is that, while you're talking about it, you're not actually doing anything about it. If you think Eric should be banned, don't just snark about it on your talk page: actually start a ban discussion on AN, or Arbcom case request, or whatever you think should be done. Because right now, at least from where I'm sitting, all it looks like is that you just want to take potshots at him from the sidelines (and, until this ANI thread, in a place where you forbade him from responding, which is hardly an open discussion), and you don't actually care about fixing this ""failure of governance"". If you really think this is a problem that needs solving, then it's time to get on your proverbial horse and ride: marshal your various arguments and diffs of evidence and start the discussion in the appropriate place (this talk page ain't it), just like any other editor. Stop talking and start doing. oh, and if you think that ""well, I can't start it because I'm Jimbo, and people will think that Jimbo starting a discussion means it won't be fair to Eric""well, snarking from the sidelines against him isn't much better, so why are you doing that? ⚇♔ "	0	0	0	0	1
Spam You have a right to raise the deletion of PayPay at deletion review but I doubt whether you will find any support. It was pure advertising. (Talk \| contribs)	0	0	0	0	0
" Happy New Year! Best wishes for the New Year!Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013! Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my retirement as FAC delegate this year, and apologies for the false alarm of my first—and hopefully last—retirement; the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the FA pages this year. Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; thank you for all you've done so well for so many years! Somehow, somehow we never ever seem to do nothin' completely nice and easy, but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the FA process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians! (Talk) "	0	0	0	0	0
(I've requested a username change to OliverTwisted, just waiting for it to be completed.)	0	0	0	0	0
" Why are you notifying me and various other editors when we have all clearly already commented on your proposal? communicate "	0	0	0	0	0
(maybe even much, much more)	0	0	0	0	0
What is Zizang then? An anonymous contributor on ipaddress 81.229.147.109 changed a section the explanation of the railways name from: The line is named after its termini, Xizang being a phonetic transcription of the name for Tibet in Putonghua to The line is named after its termini, Xizang, which is the name for Tibet in Putonghua. The second is certainly wrong, as Zizang is a piece of written text in a latin alphabet, wheras Putonghua is a spoken language only, with no way of being represented in a latin alphabet without some form of transcription. Anybody know a better way of putting this.	0	0	0	0	0
Please Check history page at 3RR page. My reports have been vandalized by G2bambino. They do not reflect what I posted.	0	0	0	0	0
REDIRECT User talk:Saturday/Translation of Polish	0	0	0	0	0
I agree totally! i have put that citation in so many times and it tells me its vandalism.	0	0	0	0	0
" ""some white people considered black people to be intellectually and socially inferior"" Only white people thought that? Let's forget about jews/arabs and asian peoples views ) A whole race of people that never invented a written language in 6000 years how could anyone think they are intellectually and socially inferior is crazy ) Must be evil white man again! Now i'm off to listen to black Mozart... oh wait... "	3	0	0	0	0
first things first. you're a fucking weirdo visiting graves of people you've never obviously met. second; I would assume as controversial a person as she is they won't lay a stone for a bit after her death. knowing the creepers of america such as yourself as example - the internet hasn't seen shit yet on the crap the internet will be flooded with as far as pictures of that stone being vandalized. ps people like you scare the shit out of me.	0	0	0	0	2
" Just had a thought! I may be able to recruit a couple of people who would be ""just the job"" for digging out some ""anti-Holtorf"" material to re-balance this article for you ) (talk …stalk!) "	0	0	0	0	0
READ THIS This is Wikipedia. It is a place where people come for infomation. So tell me how it is that a guy wants to check John Cena's recent activity in the WWE can't because SOME people want to keep the page unedited. It is not worth my time to try to bring new infomation to a page every month or two if you NERDS just change it back. THERE IS NO POINT WHATSOEVER! If I want to put what happened at Backlash I WILL BLODDY WELL PUT WHAT HAPPENED AT BACKLASH! Don't any of you nerds try and stop me! 62.136.24.17	0	0	0	0	2
BUSH NUKE IRAN!!! IT IS ARABIAN GULF STUPID PERSIANS!!!! i wanna see britney spears ruling iran and i hope it will be soon inshallah.. we support united states and israel against the terrorist iranians who support hizbolshaitan and many terrorist groups.. and also we wanna see the persians beg us for food. then they will stop climing that the ARABIAN GULF is persian.	3	0	0	0	3
is there any way to note on this page that a trolling attempt to delete the article failed?	0	0	0	0	0
. I am also well aware of your pally status with JZA so if you come to Jzas aid that might be expected.	0	0	0	0	0
" Because anons have as much right to be heard for adding new material as anyone. (C)(T) "	0	0	0	0	0
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to CSI: Crime Scene Investigation. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. talk at me "	0	0	0	0	1
I thought it was constructive The man is described as being on the very front lines of a media firestorm for over 4 months. The death of their main spokesman from a clearly aggravated heart condition is directly related.	0	0	0	0	0
Add External links/Noticeboard to the noticeboard template There have been no objections at Template_talk:Noticeboard_links#Add_External_links.2FNoticeboard. We just need an admin to do the edit. Thanks!	0	0	0	0	0
Goodbye... Power level (Dragon Ball)	0	0	0	0	0
REDIRECT Talk:List of FIFA World Cup hat-tricks/Archive1	0	0	0	0	0
BEWARE OF FLYING DICKS, FUDGING NIGGER.	3	1	0	0	2
Psephos: Adam Carr's Electoral Archive I noticed your note on Rebecca's talk page. For once we agree on something. I think an article on your webpage is a good idea. So I went ahead and started it.	0	0	0	0	0
That is interesting, I had kind of wondered about that myself. Quest for Glory IV has a few lines about the fall climate, and the Burgomeister remarks that the days are growing shorter and Winter is approaching. The first two games fit the connection well also, although the tie-ins to different cultures is even more obvious in terms of the game settings. I'd look for some interviews by the creators or some primary sources on that one, there are a lot of interviews online and the Coles themselves are still around luckily.	0	0	0	0	0
" Well said Thanks for your insightful comment at AE.Makin'Bacon "	0	0	0	0	0
Yes, that is correct.	0	0	0	0	0
" Bipolar Disorder I didn't realize that I originally pasted the ""tarnation"" disambiguation page. I meant to re-add the link for the documentary by the same name. It's fixed now. Thanks Hi ' "	0	0	0	0	0
I agree. NDW is not a style. DAF are Electropunk.	0	0	0	0	0
" The image was deleted per Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion: ""UE (unencyclopedic) - The image doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia."" Apologies for forgetting to notify you on that issue. Anyway, you can always just link to the diff instead of wasting Wikipedia's server resources. Yes, you can try and take this issue further by following the Wikipedia:Resolving disputes process and the next step is to seek mediation with 2nd Piston Honda. And for your information, this is my first day on the the job as an administrator and I was just following the advice at Wikipedia:Civility#Removing uncivil comments. ► "	0	0	0	0	0
Bridge No. 3 I don't have any pics of the bridge, but you are right it didn't hurt to ask. Looking forward to seeing it at PR. I'll give it a good look then. You reasons for fair use or whatever it's called sound sound to me. Enjoying my third night in a row at home with the family. Hope all is well with yours. There is news that I need to pass along on email. I will check my watchlist and then send out an email. That's if no domestic drama arises.	0	0	0	0	0
Whoops! There was DOCUMENTATION for the Samson analogy being well received. And it's very true despite the protestations of GAY MAFIA who try to MANIPULATE wiki articles in order to advance their propaganda machine. I fought these NUTCASES tooth and nail a few years ago only to be GAMED or should I say GAYmed (haha) by them. These liberal LOONS use the rules of Wiki to OSTRACIZE anyone who doesn't share their far left agenda. It turns out that comparing Lonnie to Samson was a compliment and not an attack on a 'dead gay man' as some gay advocate so dramatically (shocked! haha) suggested. Lonnie was NOT gay. He was a normal man who had been raped as a young boy much like Jerry Sandusky raped those little boys in the Penn State shower. This of course led Lonnie to engage in other gay activities despite his better judgement. The man himself did NOT want to practice homosexuality. But because of some GAY pedophile, he had his struggles.65.48.16.58	0	3	0	0	2
" ""I don't think this is a controversial statement at all"". I do not think it is controversial either. And besides, I don't care. Many facts or widespread intepretations are included in wikipedia that can be called controversial. The problem with this statement is that it is unconventional. It is also a POV but the POV or not discussion will become relevant when we establish at least some acceptance of this interpretation among academics. The rest here is your own speculations. They sound credible, but they are unsupported as of now. Not only they are not supported by official statements, as you point out. You are right, that such official statements would not have been given in any case. This POV is unsupported among historians. As I said, refer to some respected sources rather than your own inferences which may or may not be valid. As for the Soviet POV flooding the Wikipedia, this is irrelevant. Each corrections should be included based on its own merit. I will respond to your ""Hero City"" line on the relevant talk page. 20:08, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)"	0	0	0	0	0
Dennis GarciaW Dennis GarciaW is known as a youtuber joined 2015	0	0	0	0	0
It doesnt take that much space to use the term technology executive or founder even than it does for businessman and it describes them much better and more exactly.	0	0	0	0	0
\|decline=Checkuser verified sock of banned user. :==( o )	0	0	0	0	0
" Why you delete the information about Grigiry Grabovoi? In the article ""Resirrection"" you delete the information about his Teaching how to Resuurrect people and stay Immortal. You call iе ""fringe"". Thousands of people all over the World believe it and there are 3 legal Churches of Grabovoy in the USA. Maybe I don't believe in other religions, which speak about Resurrection, so should I delete all the info about Christianity for example?"	0	0	1	0	0
Support - clearly the primary meaning, and a less awkward title.	0	0	0	0	0
" ""We"" stand for Ultra-Orthodox Jews. Please step back because according to your 500 last edits you have never read anything about Judaism whatsoever. "	0	0	1	0	0
Personal opinion: That message above was very wierd.	0	0	0	0	0
" I got the book! The British Library finally managed to track down the reference book I've been trying to find for Magnetosphere of Jupiter. It's going to take a while to get to grips with but I should start making additions by the end of the week. podous "	0	0	0	0	0
" 1755 Lisbon earthquake 1755 Lisbon earthquake has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare ""Keep"" or ""Remove"" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here."	0	0	0	0	0
Update: Obviously you are coordinating your vandalism with JamesMLane and other partisan soboteurs. Please cease all vandalism or you will be suspended by administrators who I will contact. Thank you, Nicolas Leobold	0	0	0	0	1
" Deletion of Dewsbury Museum entry Regarding your deletion of Dewsbury Museum's entry as a ""blantant copyright infringement of http://www.kirklees.gov.uk/events/documents/DewsburyMuseum-AHistory.pdf"". As curator of Dewsbury Museum, I posted the entry in addition to being the writer of Dewsbury Museum- A History pdf"" - I would be grateful if you could restore the entry. G. Scanlan Museum Officer"	0	0	0	0	0
" You can also use π = 4 arctan(1) (where arctan is ""tan-1""), i.e. type ""1"", ""tan-1"" (in RAD mode), and multiply by 4. However, knowing kids, I find it somehow suspicious that you say ""very young"" and ""I'm about 10 years old"" - usually kids of that age are very precise concerning their age... — Talk "	0	0	0	0	0
So apparently an inability to read can make you a Wiki mod? Pretty much what it says in the header. You revert back all my edits despite my declared reasons? Okay, the first one was out of line, but all of them? Can't you be bothered to read? Hell, you're already spending your life being the gestapo for a website you're not even paid to maintain, so what's a few more seconds of reading? Or are you one of those liberals who decides socialism is enough for everyone because they figure everyone is more stupid than them? God, stupid liberals are the cancer of America. Douche. Learn to read.	0	0	0	1	2
H-bonding in secondary structure I believe that it should be noted that the disruption of secondary structure is due to the breaking of hydrogen bonds between the amino acid residues. This is important because it is the localized hydrogen bonding that lets amino acids form the secondary structures that they do.	0	0	0	0	0
Are you serious? Wow, that's cool ! But are you an American of Romanian ancestry? BTW:they unblocked my userpage, you can write there now. '''''' 8 June 2006	0	0	0	0	0
Hey faggot. Seriously?! I add legit info to pages, and you revert it. You tell me to come talk on your talk page, and you remove it. The fuck kid? You shitting me right now?	0	3	0	0	2
P.S. The agreed wiki definition is here under which its Light not heavy Passenger_rail_terminology#Heavy_rail	0	0	0	0	0
(less the few sections that are obviously unrelated to him). Some contributions in it either have been suggested to have been made by sock puppets, or are discussions of whether they were (or should be so regarded). Further, two (reverted) edits on it by User:259 are claimed to be unacceptable edits. Its history provides evidence on both the sock-puppet claims and the improper editing ones. (And that history is most likely to be used in those connections; it is for that reason that the history was carried along to that page by page-move operations, while other parts of Talk:Carleton College were cut and pasted to a new and historyless page.) Further editing of it would fall a bit short of tracking mud into a crime scene (because editing does not destroy history), but a sufficient number of edits make access to early history progressively more onerous and error prone. Therefore, in this editor's opinion, such edits must be regarded as irresponsible. Editors who do edit may, at the least, be mentioned pejoratively in a proposal to protect the sub-sub-page against further editing. Please make any comments you may have to offer on its content on the next-listed sub-sub-page. (More prosaically, the sub-sub-page is approaching the 32K limit, and freezing its content also will avoid facing the problem of how to refactor it.) Talk:Carleton College/Re M..e C..h/Comments on 2004 Jul 28 content. It is intended to accomodate any further discussion of that content as it relates, or purports to relate, to User:Mike Church and/or Ambition (game). Talk:Carleton College/Re M..e C..h/Charges of unacceptable edits by 259. It states, and offers a place for further discussion of, User:Jerzy's charges that User:259's (essentially identical) edits of 2004 Oct 7, 23:50, UTC and 2004 Oct 8, 17:24, UTC are serious offenses against WP. (t) 06:41, 2004 Oct 11 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
" TFAR FYI, I nominated Holmes's article at WP:TFAR; although I've been burned by the page's subjective favoritism in the past, I think Holmes has a good chance at six points. However, did you know that Holmes shares a birthday with Michael Jackson (also an FA)? Hmm. (habla conmigo) "	0	0	0	0	0
Oops Sorry, the wrong talk page. Please revert my edits to this.	0	0	0	0	0
Actually three editors (me, Jeandré and Greg L at ). I don't know what dispatch are you talking about but please take into consideration that one such template is already used in the article. my talk	0	0	0	0	0
North Florida listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect North Florida. Since you had some involvement with the North Florida redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). NE2 By the way, you were wrong to restore the prod tag; anyone, even the creator, can remove one. NE2	0	0	0	0	0
You have (again) been modifying the statistical figures about Estonian population in several articles. Would you please at least state the sources you use here, in your talk page, since you haven't done this in any of the articles you edited. Otherwise I'll be forced to revert these edits, to preserve the factual accuracy in the articles. I hope you'll understand.	0	0	0	0	0
" File:Iphoneemu-welcomescreen.png listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iphoneemu-welcomescreen.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. talk "	0	0	0	0	0
"] and ): I've had it and am taking this to a page over which you have less sole control. Taking this outside: See new section... Show 'n' Tell A question for It may seem an odd question to WP purists, but considering the importance WP places on reliability of secondary sources, why does WP not require a same or similar vetting process of its editors, particularly those who seem to speak only for themselves? The entire concept of requiring contributors to discuss/argue with a username is absurd in its most basic interpretation. For all I know, I could be spinning my wheels fighting for accuracy with a demented, mind game-playing geek living in inner Mongolia. It is imperative, in my mind, that those who demand respect offer up some sort of evidence, as I have, of their actual ability, credibility, reliability, accountability... their authority to control. If it's required of the sources, it should certainly be required of those who quote them and write about them. Similarly, how do I ""call for consensus?"" Who may be a member and how is each identified? Thanks in advance... : That's the beauty of Wikipedia. Anyone can edit it. That's the point. You have no more authority than any other editor here, regardless of your credentials. Also, anyone can participate when trying to achieve consensus. Just remember: it's not the number of people, but the strength or the arguments that matter. darian "	0	0	0	0	0
Amateurs can win professional tournaments (they just don't receive the prize money).	0	0	0	0	0
Cheesy Bread Even though Cheesy Bread may be good, the Batman & Robin article is not the place for the discussion of your favorite foods. Thanks and have a wonderful day.	0	0	0	0	0
Hey there, good to see you. I've set up an adoption classroom for you at	0	0	0	0	0
I did some work on the article based on the source you provided. I also removed the tags. Thanks for finding that and amending the text, this was an embarassment before. t/c	0	0	0	0	0
" The relevant question is: What is ""prohibitive interference""? Namely, do you count the Georgian air defenses as such. "	0	0	0	0	0
" Corrected TYPO in your ""About Me"" section! (Please to ""Pleased"", adding missing d) 09:50, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)"	0	0	0	0	0
REDIRECT Talk:Bicycle parking rack	0	0	0	0	0
Re: more thanks No worries at all... it's a pleasure to copyedit a well-researched and sensibly structured article. Not to mention a chance for me to learn a lot. Keep up the good work -) (talk•contribs)	0	0	0	0	0
OK, calm down. I only did it once so how the hell can you tell me to STOP linking?	0	0	0	0	1
Fire Service Co-Responders hi i know their is not 15 gire services their is 46 i am getting info slowly.	0	0	0	0	0
" From an uninvolved editor. First off, please chill out. Being blocked is not the end of the world, and the fact that it ends in one week means you are being given a second chance. If you keep behaving this way, it's just going to escalate. No one is looking to silence you. Editing Wikipedia is a privilege, not a right, like driving a car: you'll keep getting warnings and tickets for bad behavior until your license is lifted. If you continue to break policy and tell people to ""fuck off"" your editing privileges will be revoked. Like real life, it is the way it works. Second, you were told exactly why you were blocked: you violated copyright and harassed the editor who removed the offending material. Did you read WP:COPYPASTE like I had suggested? It clearly states that copying text verbatim from other sources into Wikipedia articles is not allowed. It does not distinguish between works of fiction or non-fiction, therefore it holds for all available written content. Even if you don't agree that the edit was a copyright violation, you should not have reacted so hostilely. If you feel people aren't listening to your side, don't call them ""fascists."" It is the same as calling someone a Nazi: it is childish and it will only make people cease to take you seriously. During this block, please reflect on your previous actions and read up on existing Wikipedia policies by the time your block expires. "	0	0	0	0	1
This is your opinion, opinions don't go in articles, facts as they're shown by Marvel goes in the article. There are legitimate examples in the article that he possesses superhuman strength. If you disagree, find something that backs up your position. If Marvel decides one day to do a storyline canon to the 616 reality where Wolverine wakes up with a wife, kids, and a house with a little white picket fence and realizes that all of his adventures have been a dream, then it will go in the article. It wouldn't matter if it made no sense to you or you didn't agree with it or thought it was bad writing. If you feel this strongly about it, take it to the project as a whole. Otherwise, it's going to stay in the article.	0	0	0	0	0
other ethnic groups) as well as	0	0	0	0	0
" It was published by someone ""reliable"", note the copyright messages involving the radio shows and TV shows on which she appeared. We are dealing with a person in broadcast media. She made her own news, and broadcast it live (and tape-delayed). I use her as my source. As far as your ""redaction"", I'm going to take issue with that, can't you righties handle an unbiased assessment based on law? Read USA Patriot. The woman is a Terrorist, and she is her own source on the statements she made to millions of people, many of which have already acted in various ways on her incitement. Also, I suggest you look at both the law and case law concerning libel cases, she claims it, she has to prove it. I use her own words to make my case, meaning she has no case. Of course, you want this to be a one-way discussion, with you controlling things, even what gets seen in the discussion, and I honestly take exception on your ""redaction"". I'm at the point where I think you are one of this Terrorist's supporters? Do you support Terrorist attacks on Liberal Americans? She does, and has said so in front of millions of witnesses. You defend her here, and that makes me wonder about YOU. Her station, and the networks, both television and radio, on which she has made such statements are reliable sources, IMHO, you are full of....concerning the sourcing. When the person in question says it on a copyrighted program in front of millions of witnesses, it is rediculous to ask for further sourcing, especially from a news media that takes Terrorist threats from the radical right as SOP and doesn't bother to report on them.\u2014Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.19.246 Oh, and yes, this is an ""encyclopedia"", and as such, if the person makes Terrorist threats in front of millions of witnesses, then I think that fact should be in the encylopedia entry on that person. Why do you righties always think you can get away with Terrorism, and go unpunished, and not be identified as a Terrorist? If there is a place to do this, it is here. The woman does it in front of millions of witnesses. This is a matter of record, and if this ""encyclopedia"" is to be construed as a ""record"", it needs to have the full story."	0	1	0	0	3
stop making crappy excuses cuz a few other station complex articles like broadway junction or times square port authority bus terminal do not mention exactly what trains stop where so your point and reverts are moot at best	0	0	0	0	1
REDIRECT User talk:NeonMerlin/archive 2	0	0	0	0	0
Vandalism Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Mike hawk) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.	0	0	0	0	0
EXCUSE ME, but shouldn't you have warned the uploader first? Or is it customary for you to delete images wihout warning? I was the original uploader, and I protest!	0	0	0	0	0
Hi your name meant the cat 88.	0	0	0	0	0
Let us assume all that is accurate, meaning the side of President Kennedy's head was blown out above the right ear: What conclusions, if any, can be drawn from that?	0	0	0	0	0
The statement about the genome being different is disputed. A news article claims that it's related to the strain of a previous outbreak. — (talk)	0	0	0	0	0
Admin or Fascist? Just wondering, are you a Admin, a Fascist or both? So the only crap one can post on Liberalpedia is crap from God-hating liberal sites? You undid two links of mine because they actually are based on what the Bible says? What a sad LITTLE boy you are.69.14.97.53	0	2	1	0	1
" Shiotani Teiko. And dozens and dozens more just like it. Hi. You created an article saying, in full: Shiotani Teiko (塩谷定好? しおたにていこう, 1899 - 1988) was a renowned Japanese photographer. Actually it's Teikō, not Teiko, and according to WP's silly rules we have to ignore his real name of Shiotani Teikō and instead call him Teikō Shiotani. But that's not the main problem, which is that he's described in just about the same way as Kuribayashi Satoshi (栗林慧? くりばやしさとし, born 1939) is a renowned Japanese photographer. Or indeed Watanabe Kanendo (渡辺兼人? わたなべかねんど, born 1947) is a renowned Japanese photographer. Or Orihara Kei (折原恵? おりはらけい, born 1948) is a renowned Japanese photographer. And so on and so on and so on. Which all means that somebody looking among Category:Japanese photographers is highly likely to land on a mere substub. I can count on my fingers the people likely to turn a half dozen or so of these substubs into articles. No, on my thumbs: User:Pinkville and myself. But he's busy and I am too. I'd rate the probability that more than half will be converted within a year to more than stubs at well under 1%. It's an interesting ""proof of bot concept"" exercise, but is it good for anything else? Tell you what: I'll match you one for one. You turn two of these into articles; I'll turn two into articles. You turn ten into articles; I'll turn ten into articles. How does that sound? That's a great challenge! You're on. – (talk) (random) OK then. Do tell me when you've done one, as I can't keep the whole damn lot on my watchlist. Well actually I can, but I lack the time and effort to put them onto my watchlist. Also, I'll be intercoursingly busy during the next month, so in the short/medium term I may only be able to match you up to ten. I'm sure I've got entire books by at least twenty of these substubbed people, so I ought to be able to do more. What's odd about the list are some conspicuous absences. (Not just people I think are good, but people who, rightly or wrongly, are celebrated and successful.) Asai Shinpei is one, and there are more though I can't think of them right now. Not that it's any of my business, really, but did you scarf the list from User:20th Century Art (Zenhan)'s page, or do something else? Yeah, I scraped from Zenhan. I'll let you know here, or on your talk page, when I have one ready. I don't think I can make any of them featured, but legitimately ""non-stub"" is the goal. All the best, – (talk) (random) Okay, here's my first. Ichiki Shiro. It's not much beyond a stub, but it's something. (It took an hour of research, and I think I found all the info that's anywhere on the web regarding Mr. Ichiki.) By the way, was I right in listing him as a Hatamoto? My sources say he was a retainer of the Daimyo (in the Edo period, of course), and I know that he spoke with his Daimyo, so he couldn't have been a Gokenin. But I don't think he was a warrior, so I don't know. So far as I can tell, all Togugawa retainers were either Gokenin or Hatamoto. Am I correct in my inference? – (talk) (random) Damn you're fast. Unfortunately I don't know squat about Tokugawa retainers and the like. On several occasions I've tried to interest myself in feudal history but have always fallen flat. I suppose I can't separate it from the hammily acted, cheesily lit TV period dramas I sometimes have to tolerate when at the in-laws'. LordAmeth might know. (And this photographer's right up Pinkville's street.) How's this for a progress indicator? Great! – (talk) (random) Yup, except for a number of factors, one of which is that it's problematical copyrightwise (or so I infer from a comment elsewhere by one User:Quadell). I've already chucked in one extra list, and I'll certainly add one more, and I may add one after that; perhaps it can then be described as an original creation. All this is delaying my editing of any article. Still, I'll get around to that too in time. I hope that I've no	0	0	0	0	0
" Nominations are not supposed to be written in alphabetical orders. When a housemate nominates two names the appear as 1st Nomination, 2nd Nomination. Only when the nominees are resulted, they are specified in alphabetical order. If you watch the show closely you will see that the pairs were nominated as ""We want to nominate Sampat and Sana"". Therefore Sampat's name has been introduced first and then Sana's in the table. chat "	0	0	0	0	0
", 25 October 2011 (UTC) Overagainst: I respectfully disagree, and that still doesn't mean that it should displace all other sources in the article. I also never wrote that this was a medical dictionary, I wrote that this is an encyclopedia article and as such should encapsulate, to the extent possible in a small space and for a lay audience, the current state of scientific understanding of vitamin D, which means that the order in which things appear in the article should be changed. I also explicitly stated I was against a separate section for ""dissenting opinions"", or ""other opinions"". I agree with Doc James we should preferentially include reviews and meta-analyses, but there are enough of those which contradict the IOM recommendations that it shouldn't be a problem to give this article the balance it deserves while maintaining a high standard. The point is that the article reads like somebody's agenda, in other words, it reads POV. The sources have been cherry-picked and the tone is against supplementation, which doesn't reflect the body of research. The article needs to be changed. 14:12"	0	0	0	0	0
" The efforts by Elonka, et. al., to ratify this laughable whitewash of an article are just ludicrous. There is utterly nothing ""neutral"" about what Wikipedia has puked out onto the Internet about Matt Sanchez. ref "	2	0	0	0	1
" Thank you for asking, A; I'm perfectly fine, no big deal, just ""growin' old ain't for sissies"" routine stuff. Thanks again, (Talk) "	0	0	0	0	0
" JdeJ, I understand your concerns fully, believe me. I would however prefer you request at WP:RFPP for unprotection so that a pair of fresh eyes can look at the article. ~ Riana ⁂ "	0	0	0	0	0
. This Jimmys exists only in anglosaxons countries. www.plymouthbrethren.org Shawn Abigail review on this sect	2	0	1	0	0
Talk page Do you know what the purpose of these talk pages is? To share views. Please, read also spam. 85.202.40.145 PS Block me if you dare. It's not what the point of editing Wikipedia though.	0	0	0	0	1

Clearly this user has compromised his own vanity page by editing it, no? You have to agree with that?

0

Geographic overview Getting: Error creating thumbnail: Invalid thumbnail parameters @ Image:Map of Kansas City.png. Anyone else getting this?

0

The pattern again, you attack then post wiki bannners LOL

0

1

I've made comments on the article talk page - ironically, if it wasn't for the warring, this would be close to WP:GA

0

An example of how to strike out code:text struck through will look like this: text struck through

0

"Interested party comment. Firstly Justin is not correct when he says he was standardising members of Category:Lists of songs by authors or performers, there are List of cover versions of XXXX, List of songs written by XXXX, List of songs with lyrics by XXXX (Justin actually moved one to this this week!), List of cover versions of XXXX, List of singles by XXXX List of unreleased XXXX songs, List of xxxx songs, List of songs by XXXX. List of songs recorded bv XXXX, amongst others. Taken with ""songs written by, then the written/recorded by would have been the majority! If Justin had started amongst those single individualistic titles he would have had my blessing! All the Leona Lewis move does, and several others (but not necessarily all) is to ignore the content and subject matter of the article and to move according to where one person thinks WP wants it. I have placed a requested move on the Leona Lewis list and several others and opposed Justin's requests for moves where appropriate. I have also moved a couple of lists that state ""List of songs recorded by"" to where they belong. For what it's worth, I have always preferred 'Songs recorded by' as it is specific, easily understandable and eliminates entries for one live performance on a wet Wednesday in Wichita (ie non-notable). List of Richhoncho songs could mean what's on my ipod today! "

0

I have tried to adress that problem now, and I think it works quite well except that it has a premature ending. Who is to get the final word, and what would it be?

0

" ""Unsigned"", The Defender of Al Lineage It seems that 'unsigned', the coward doen't want to come out and counter the truth with what is apparently his thinly-veiled defense of Rev.Al""s very immediate connection to strom Thurmond. Just goes to show, as actor Jack Nicholson's iconic stement ""YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!"" Once Again: How else do you think he is related? Strom Thurmond himself has raped many a littele, underaged and defensive black gal, as did his ancestor(s) raped one, or several of Al's enslved female ancestors!!! However, given Thurmonds's age, circumscribing nearly THREE CENTURIES, he probably raped several succesive generations of Al's women-folk. Yet another ""creative"" version of willful southern ""inbreeding"" When Sharpton became publically known outside NYC (he was for decades earlier in the FBI's files, of which I suspect that Thurmond knew of him before then, given his special access to govenment files,) the old piking fart-child-rapist must have howled with satanic laughter that the descendant of one of his ""bastard whelps"" became a black activist. (And before you, or anyone else start with the infantile objections, all this is in the public record, just a click and a scroll away!!! Added to this, know that the alphabet soup of US, ""unratified"" federal police agencies have colullded with southern and mid-western (Mornmon) ancester-tracking organizations; indeed , many of the former overlap with the feds. Just as the WASPs across the Pond has ever done since the Domesday Book. Rebuttal, anyone? Remeber, It's all in the public record for all to see. See? 24.46.103.28 Veryverser Omitted Items F.Y.I: THIS LITTLE TID-BIT IS ALSO NOT GOING TO DISAPPEAR JUST BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR AMORAL CRONIESTRY TO HIDE AND DEFEND CREATURES LIKE THIS ONE. Wasn't there, in an earlier version of this article a statement that Al Sharpton-when a youth-was first introduced to street politics and organizing by THE REVOLUTIONARY YOUTH MOVEMENT (RYM)? As I recalled, the RYM was an arm of the U.S. Labor Party headed by Lyndon Larouche. Interesting that Larouche who years ago was involved in NYC politics through his proxy cnadidates running for local office right into the 80s never mentioned Sharpton, or his affiliation with RYM. It is also curious how the media, even African American journalists failed to mention that the original arbitors of the forced eviction efforts of Freddies was its landords, a black Pentacostal Church!!!??? Nothing of this was ever mentioned by the press. And Sharpton never gave a clue to the public. Amazing. So, it is true the allegations of Sharpton being and agent provocateur. There are more inconsistancies, like his perfidy of the United African Movement and betrayal of Alton Maddox. Now, Rev. Al is cozy with Obama and the New York County District Attorney's office? (NO MATTER HOW HARD YOU TRY, IT'S NEVER GOING TO GO AWAY!!!) Veryverser On the ""Freddie's Mart"" Controversey Reliable sources that also include this very article collaborating info I and many others have received concerning the case of Freddie's Mart's landlord who was never cited by Sharpton! As for Rev. Al's perfidy concerning the UAM and Alton Maddox, who it must be strenuously reiterated rescued Alfred from the wrath of Morganthau, the New York State Attorney's office again and again! As for the statement of Sharpton's affiliation with Larouche (aka Lyn Marcus's) ""Revolutionary Youth Movement"", although I heard that the former had been involved in the mid-70s with a predomiately African-American youth movement in NYC, I didn't know the name of it until an earlier version of this very same article stated the name of it. (That earlier iteration is to all purposes now ommitted from viewing unless the author decides to put these item back in. I also noticed that there are many facts added to the present article; others understandbly taken out.) Rev. Al doesn't make reference to this affiliation in any detail in his auto-bio, but that is the nature and restriction of such tomes: What is not said is left for others to investigate. What his involvement with RYM is something that the Good Reverend, the F.B.I. as well as other police agencies scrutinizing Al for the past 35-yrs, LaRouche, some of the surviving members of RYM to attest. Yes, I agree with you that this is information warfare, by any other name. when has it not ever been? Veryverser"

3

2

0

3

" Message Hey Coolrunner87, you tedious little shit. Why don't you just grow a pair and stop wasting everyone's time with your whiny posturing about ""vandalism""? Fact is, RD Reynolds is a vile mound of goo and puss and is undeserving of a wikipedia entry. Maybe you should go and start an ""IWC wiki"" or some suchlike, and put all your overweight friends in there? Wikipedia is supposed to be about serious issues like politics, science, geography etc, not some morbidly obese basement dweller who makes up crap about professional wrestling! His books have no sources and contain more errors per page than there are zits on your face. "

0

2

0

1

2

Gilmore Girls I'm trying to figure out a few things when adding Season 7 and Complete Series. I somehow added an extra square and don't know how to undo it and I'm still trying to figure out background colours. Can you take a look and tell me how I can fix it? I don't want you to fix it until I give it a shot. Thanks

0

" I have not issued any ""threat"" nor would I ever do that ! I have been blocked unfairly . My contention is with Cynefin: it is a pseudoscientific model posing as a reality-based model. When Nobel Laureats have no reached a consensus on ""complex systems"" with non sentient items like particles; there is ""no way in heaven"" that ""Professor"" David Snowden has reached a viable conclusion. Wiki is not a place for pseudoscience and where there is such, then it must be balanced with criticism. chuck "

0

" Jimbo... I hope you'll take this as it's meantthat is, without too much rancorbut I think it's time for you to put up or shut up. I think the problem that (at least some) people are having with your issues with Eric is that, while you're talking about it, you're not actually doing anything about it. If you think Eric should be banned, don't just snark about it on your talk page: actually start a ban discussion on AN, or Arbcom case request, or whatever you think should be done. Because right now, at least from where I'm sitting, all it looks like is that you just want to take potshots at him from the sidelines (and, until this ANI thread, in a place where you forbade him from responding, which is hardly an open discussion), and you don't actually care about fixing this ""failure of governance"". If you really think this is a problem that needs solving, then it's time to get on your proverbial horse and ride: marshal your various arguments and diffs of evidence and start the discussion in the appropriate place (this talk page ain't it), just like any other editor. Stop talking and start doing. oh, and if you think that ""well, I can't start it because I'm Jimbo, and people will think that Jimbo starting a discussion means it won't be fair to Eric""well, snarking from the sidelines against him isn't much better, so why are you doing that? ⚇♔ "

0

1

Spam You have a right to raise the deletion of PayPay at deletion review but I doubt whether you will find any support. It was pure advertising. (Talk | contribs)

0

" Happy New Year! Best wishes for the New Year!Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013! Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my retirement as FAC delegate this year, and apologies for the false alarm of my first—and hopefully last—retirement; the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the FA pages this year. Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; thank you for all you've done so well for so many years! Somehow, somehow we never ever seem to do nothin' completely nice and easy, but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the FA process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians! (Talk) "

0

(I've requested a username change to OliverTwisted, just waiting for it to be completed.)

0

" Why are you notifying me and various other editors when we have all clearly already commented on your proposal? communicate "

0

(maybe even much, much more)

0

What is Zizang then? An anonymous contributor on ipaddress 81.229.147.109 changed a section the explanation of the railways name from: The line is named after its termini, Xizang being a phonetic transcription of the name for Tibet in Putonghua to The line is named after its termini, Xizang, which is the name for Tibet in Putonghua. The second is certainly wrong, as Zizang is a piece of written text in a latin alphabet, wheras Putonghua is a spoken language only, with no way of being represented in a latin alphabet without some form of transcription. Anybody know a better way of putting this.

0

Please Check history page at 3RR page. My reports have been vandalized by G2bambino. They do not reflect what I posted.

0

REDIRECT User talk:Saturday/Translation of Polish

0

I agree totally! i have put that citation in so many times and it tells me its vandalism.

0

" ""some white people considered black people to be intellectually and socially inferior"" Only white people thought that? Let's forget about jews/arabs and asian peoples views ) A whole race of people that never invented a written language in 6000 years how could anyone think they are intellectually and socially inferior is crazy ) Must be evil white man again! Now i'm off to listen to black Mozart... oh wait... "

3

0

first things first. you're a fucking weirdo visiting graves of people you've never obviously met. second; I would assume as controversial a person as she is they won't lay a stone for a bit after her death. knowing the creepers of america such as yourself as example - the internet hasn't seen shit yet on the crap the internet will be flooded with as far as pictures of that stone being vandalized. ps people like you scare the shit out of me.

0

2

" Just had a thought! I may be able to recruit a couple of people who would be ""just the job"" for digging out some ""anti-Holtorf"" material to re-balance this article for you ) (talk …stalk!) "

0

READ THIS This is Wikipedia. It is a place where people come for infomation. So tell me how it is that a guy wants to check John Cena's recent activity in the WWE can't because SOME people want to keep the page unedited. It is not worth my time to try to bring new infomation to a page every month or two if you NERDS just change it back. THERE IS NO POINT WHATSOEVER! If I want to put what happened at Backlash I WILL BLODDY WELL PUT WHAT HAPPENED AT BACKLASH! Don't any of you nerds try and stop me! 62.136.24.17

0

2

BUSH NUKE IRAN!!! IT IS ARABIAN GULF STUPID PERSIANS!!!! i wanna see britney spears ruling iran and i hope it will be soon inshallah.. we support united states and israel against the terrorist iranians who support hizbolshaitan and many terrorist groups.. and also we wanna see the persians beg us for food. then they will stop climing that the ARABIAN GULF is persian.

3

0

3

is there any way to note on this page that a trolling attempt to delete the article failed?

0

. I am also well aware of your pally status with JZA so if you come to Jzas aid that might be expected.

0

" Because anons have as much right to be heard for adding new material as anyone. (C)(T) "

0

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to CSI: Crime Scene Investigation. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. talk at me "

0

1

I thought it was constructive The man is described as being on the very front lines of a media firestorm for over 4 months. The death of their main spokesman from a clearly aggravated heart condition is directly related.

0

Add External links/Noticeboard to the noticeboard template There have been no objections at Template_talk:Noticeboard_links#Add_External_links.2FNoticeboard. We just need an admin to do the edit. Thanks!

0

Goodbye... Power level (Dragon Ball)

0

REDIRECT Talk:List of FIFA World Cup hat-tricks/Archive1

0

BEWARE OF FLYING DICKS, FUDGING NIGGER.

3

1

0

2

Psephos: Adam Carr's Electoral Archive I noticed your note on Rebecca's talk page. For once we agree on something. I think an article on your webpage is a good idea. So I went ahead and started it.

0

That is interesting, I had kind of wondered about that myself. Quest for Glory IV has a few lines about the fall climate, and the Burgomeister remarks that the days are growing shorter and Winter is approaching. The first two games fit the connection well also, although the tie-ins to different cultures is even more obvious in terms of the game settings. I'd look for some interviews by the creators or some primary sources on that one, there are a lot of interviews online and the Coles themselves are still around luckily.

0

" Well said Thanks for your insightful comment at AE.Makin'Bacon "

0

Yes, that is correct.

0

" Bipolar Disorder I didn't realize that I originally pasted the ""tarnation"" disambiguation page. I meant to re-add the link for the documentary by the same name. It's fixed now. Thanks Hi ' "

0

I agree. NDW is not a style. DAF are Electropunk.

0

" The image was deleted per Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion: ""UE (unencyclopedic) - The image doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia."" Apologies for forgetting to notify you on that issue. Anyway, you can always just link to the diff instead of wasting Wikipedia's server resources. Yes, you can try and take this issue further by following the Wikipedia:Resolving disputes process and the next step is to seek mediation with 2nd Piston Honda. And for your information, this is my first day on the the job as an administrator and I was just following the advice at Wikipedia:Civility#Removing uncivil comments. ► "

0

Bridge No. 3 I don't have any pics of the bridge, but you are right it didn't hurt to ask. Looking forward to seeing it at PR. I'll give it a good look then. You reasons for fair use or whatever it's called sound sound to me. Enjoying my third night in a row at home with the family. Hope all is well with yours. There is news that I need to pass along on email. I will check my watchlist and then send out an email. That's if no domestic drama arises.

0

Whoops! There was DOCUMENTATION for the Samson analogy being well received. And it's very true despite the protestations of GAY MAFIA who try to MANIPULATE wiki articles in order to advance their propaganda machine. I fought these NUTCASES tooth and nail a few years ago only to be GAMED or should I say GAYmed (haha) by them. These liberal LOONS use the rules of Wiki to OSTRACIZE anyone who doesn't share their far left agenda. It turns out that comparing Lonnie to Samson was a compliment and not an attack on a 'dead gay man' as some gay advocate so dramatically (shocked! haha) suggested. Lonnie was NOT gay. He was a normal man who had been raped as a young boy much like Jerry Sandusky raped those little boys in the Penn State shower. This of course led Lonnie to engage in other gay activities despite his better judgement. The man himself did NOT want to practice homosexuality. But because of some GAY pedophile, he had his struggles.65.48.16.58

0

3

0

2

" ""I don't think this is a controversial statement at all"". I do not think it is controversial either. And besides, I don't care. Many facts or widespread intepretations are included in wikipedia that can be called controversial. The problem with this statement is that it is unconventional. It is also a POV but the POV or not discussion will become relevant when we establish at least some acceptance of this interpretation among academics. The rest here is your own speculations. They sound credible, but they are unsupported as of now. Not only they are not supported by official statements, as you point out. You are right, that such official statements would not have been given in any case. This POV is unsupported among historians. As I said, refer to some respected sources rather than your own inferences which may or may not be valid. As for the Soviet POV flooding the Wikipedia, this is irrelevant. Each corrections should be included based on its own merit. I will respond to your ""Hero City"" line on the relevant talk page. 20:08, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)"

0

Dennis GarciaW Dennis GarciaW is known as a youtuber joined 2015

0

It doesnt take that much space to use the term technology executive or founder even than it does for businessman and it describes them much better and more exactly.

0

|decline=Checkuser verified sock of banned user. :==( o )

0

" Why you delete the information about Grigiry Grabovoi? In the article ""Resirrection"" you delete the information about his Teaching how to Resuurrect people and stay Immortal. You call iе ""fringe"". Thousands of people all over the World believe it and there are 3 legal Churches of Grabovoy in the USA. Maybe I don't believe in other religions, which speak about Resurrection, so should I delete all the info about Christianity for example?"

0

1

0

Support - clearly the primary meaning, and a less awkward title.

0

" ""We"" stand for Ultra-Orthodox Jews. Please step back because according to your 500 last edits you have never read anything about Judaism whatsoever. "

0

1

0

Personal opinion: That message above was very wierd.

0

" I got the book! The British Library finally managed to track down the reference book I've been trying to find for Magnetosphere of Jupiter. It's going to take a while to get to grips with but I should start making additions by the end of the week. podous "

0

" 1755 Lisbon earthquake 1755 Lisbon earthquake has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare ""Keep"" or ""Remove"" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here."

0

Update: Obviously you are coordinating your vandalism with JamesMLane and other partisan soboteurs. Please cease all vandalism or you will be suspended by administrators who I will contact. Thank you, Nicolas Leobold

0

1

" Deletion of Dewsbury Museum entry Regarding your deletion of Dewsbury Museum's entry as a ""blantant copyright infringement of http://www.kirklees.gov.uk/events/documents/DewsburyMuseum-AHistory.pdf"". As curator of Dewsbury Museum, I posted the entry in addition to being the writer of Dewsbury Museum- A History pdf"" - I would be grateful if you could restore the entry. G. Scanlan Museum Officer"

0

" You can also use π = 4 arctan(1) (where arctan is ""tan-1""), i.e. type ""1"", ""tan-1"" (in RAD mode), and multiply by 4. However, knowing kids, I find it somehow suspicious that you say ""very young"" and ""I'm about 10 years old"" - usually kids of that age are very precise concerning their age... — Talk "

0

So apparently an inability to read can make you a Wiki mod? Pretty much what it says in the header. You revert back all my edits despite my declared reasons? Okay, the first one was out of line, but all of them? Can't you be bothered to read? Hell, you're already spending your life being the gestapo for a website you're not even paid to maintain, so what's a few more seconds of reading? Or are you one of those liberals who decides socialism is enough for everyone because they figure everyone is more stupid than them? God, stupid liberals are the cancer of America. Douche. Learn to read.

0

1

2

H-bonding in secondary structure I believe that it should be noted that the disruption of secondary structure is due to the breaking of hydrogen bonds between the amino acid residues. This is important because it is the localized hydrogen bonding that lets amino acids form the secondary structures that they do.

0

Are you serious? Wow, that's cool ! But are you an American of Romanian ancestry? BTW:they unblocked my userpage, you can write there now. '''''' 8 June 2006

0

Hey faggot. Seriously?! I add legit info to pages, and you revert it. You tell me to come talk on your talk page, and you remove it. The fuck kid? You shitting me right now?

0

3

0

2

P.S. The agreed wiki definition is here under which its Light not heavy Passenger_rail_terminology#Heavy_rail

0

(less the few sections that are obviously unrelated to him). Some contributions in it either have been suggested to have been made by sock puppets, or are discussions of whether they were (or should be so regarded). Further, two (reverted) edits on it by User:259 are claimed to be unacceptable edits. Its history provides evidence on both the sock-puppet claims and the improper editing ones. (And that history is most likely to be used in those connections; it is for that reason that the history was carried along to that page by page-move operations, while other parts of Talk:Carleton College were cut and pasted to a new and historyless page.) Further editing of it would fall a bit short of tracking mud into a crime scene (because editing does not destroy history), but a sufficient number of edits make access to early history progressively more onerous and error prone. Therefore, in this editor's opinion, such edits must be regarded as irresponsible. Editors who do edit may, at the least, be mentioned pejoratively in a proposal to protect the sub-sub-page against further editing. Please make any comments you may have to offer on its content on the next-listed sub-sub-page. (More prosaically, the sub-sub-page is approaching the 32K limit, and freezing its content also will avoid facing the problem of how to refactor it.) Talk:Carleton College/Re M..e C..h/Comments on 2004 Jul 28 content. It is intended to accomodate any further discussion of that content as it relates, or purports to relate, to User:Mike Church and/or Ambition (game). Talk:Carleton College/Re M..e C..h/Charges of unacceptable edits by 259. It states, and offers a place for further discussion of, User:Jerzy's charges that User:259's (essentially identical) edits of 2004 Oct 7, 23:50, UTC and 2004 Oct 8, 17:24, UTC are serious offenses against WP. (t) 06:41, 2004 Oct 11 (UTC)

0

" TFAR FYI, I nominated Holmes's article at WP:TFAR; although I've been burned by the page's subjective favoritism in the past, I think Holmes has a good chance at six points. However, did you know that Holmes shares a birthday with Michael Jackson (also an FA)? Hmm. (habla conmigo) "

0

Oops Sorry, the wrong talk page. Please revert my edits to this.

0

Actually three editors (me, Jeandré and Greg L at ). I don't know what dispatch are you talking about but please take into consideration that one such template is already used in the article. my talk

0

North Florida listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect North Florida. Since you had some involvement with the North Florida redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). NE2 By the way, you were wrong to restore the prod tag; anyone, even the creator, can remove one. NE2

0

You have (again) been modifying the statistical figures about Estonian population in several articles. Would you please at least state the sources you use here, in your talk page, since you haven't done this in any of the articles you edited. Otherwise I'll be forced to revert these edits, to preserve the factual accuracy in the articles. I hope you'll understand.

0

" File:Iphoneemu-welcomescreen.png listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iphoneemu-welcomescreen.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. talk "

0

"] and ): I've had it and am taking this to a page over which you have less sole control. Taking this outside: See new section... Show 'n' Tell A question for It may seem an odd question to WP purists, but considering the importance WP places on reliability of secondary sources, why does WP not require a same or similar vetting process of its editors, particularly those who seem to speak only for themselves? The entire concept of requiring contributors to discuss/argue with a username is absurd in its most basic interpretation. For all I know, I could be spinning my wheels fighting for accuracy with a demented, mind game-playing geek living in inner Mongolia. It is imperative, in my mind, that those who demand respect offer up some sort of evidence, as I have, of their actual ability, credibility, reliability, accountability... their authority to control. If it's required of the sources, it should certainly be required of those who quote them and write about them. Similarly, how do I ""call for consensus?"" Who may be a member and how is each identified? Thanks in advance... : That's the beauty of Wikipedia. Anyone can edit it. That's the point. You have no more authority than any other editor here, regardless of your credentials. Also, anyone can participate when trying to achieve consensus. Just remember: it's not the number of people, but the strength or the arguments that matter. darian "

0

Amateurs can win professional tournaments (they just don't receive the prize money).

0

Cheesy Bread Even though Cheesy Bread may be good, the Batman & Robin article is not the place for the discussion of your favorite foods. Thanks and have a wonderful day.

0

Hey there, good to see you. I've set up an adoption classroom for you at

0

I did some work on the article based on the source you provided. I also removed the tags. Thanks for finding that and amending the text, this was an embarassment before. t/c

0

" The relevant question is: What is ""prohibitive interference""? Namely, do you count the Georgian air defenses as such. "

0

" Corrected TYPO in your ""About Me"" section! (Please to ""Pleased"", adding missing d) 09:50, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)"

0

REDIRECT Talk:Bicycle parking rack

0

Re: more thanks No worries at all... it's a pleasure to copyedit a well-researched and sensibly structured article. Not to mention a chance for me to learn a lot. Keep up the good work -) (talk•contribs)

0

OK, calm down. I only did it once so how the hell can you tell me to STOP linking?

0

1

Fire Service Co-Responders hi i know their is not 15 gire services their is 46 i am getting info slowly.

0

" From an uninvolved editor. First off, please chill out. Being blocked is not the end of the world, and the fact that it ends in one week means you are being given a second chance. If you keep behaving this way, it's just going to escalate. No one is looking to silence you. Editing Wikipedia is a privilege, not a right, like driving a car: you'll keep getting warnings and tickets for bad behavior until your license is lifted. If you continue to break policy and tell people to ""fuck off"" your editing privileges will be revoked. Like real life, it is the way it works. Second, you were told exactly why you were blocked: you violated copyright and harassed the editor who removed the offending material. Did you read WP:COPYPASTE like I had suggested? It clearly states that copying text verbatim from other sources into Wikipedia articles is not allowed. It does not distinguish between works of fiction or non-fiction, therefore it holds for all available written content. Even if you don't agree that the edit was a copyright violation, you should not have reacted so hostilely. If you feel people aren't listening to your side, don't call them ""fascists."" It is the same as calling someone a Nazi: it is childish and it will only make people cease to take you seriously. During this block, please reflect on your previous actions and read up on existing Wikipedia policies by the time your block expires. "

0

1

This is your opinion, opinions don't go in articles, facts as they're shown by Marvel goes in the article. There are legitimate examples in the article that he possesses superhuman strength. If you disagree, find something that backs up your position. If Marvel decides one day to do a storyline canon to the 616 reality where Wolverine wakes up with a wife, kids, and a house with a little white picket fence and realizes that all of his adventures have been a dream, then it will go in the article. It wouldn't matter if it made no sense to you or you didn't agree with it or thought it was bad writing. If you feel this strongly about it, take it to the project as a whole. Otherwise, it's going to stay in the article.

0

other ethnic groups) as well as

0

" It was published by someone ""reliable"", note the copyright messages involving the radio shows and TV shows on which she appeared. We are dealing with a person in broadcast media. She made her own news, and broadcast it live (and tape-delayed). I use her as my source. As far as your ""redaction"", I'm going to take issue with that, can't you righties handle an unbiased assessment based on law? Read USA Patriot. The woman is a Terrorist, and she is her own source on the statements she made to millions of people, many of which have already acted in various ways on her incitement. Also, I suggest you look at both the law and case law concerning libel cases, she claims it, she has to prove it. I use her own words to make my case, meaning she has no case. Of course, you want this to be a one-way discussion, with you controlling things, even what gets seen in the discussion, and I honestly take exception on your ""redaction"". I'm at the point where I think you are one of this Terrorist's supporters? Do you support Terrorist attacks on Liberal Americans? She does, and has said so in front of millions of witnesses. You defend her here, and that makes me wonder about YOU. Her station, and the networks, both television and radio, on which she has made such statements are reliable sources, IMHO, you are full of....concerning the sourcing. When the person in question says it on a copyrighted program in front of millions of witnesses, it is rediculous to ask for further sourcing, especially from a news media that takes Terrorist threats from the radical right as SOP and doesn't bother to report on them.\u2014Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.19.246 Oh, and yes, this is an ""encyclopedia"", and as such, if the person makes Terrorist threats in front of millions of witnesses, then I think that fact should be in the encylopedia entry on that person. Why do you righties always think you can get away with Terrorism, and go unpunished, and not be identified as a Terrorist? If there is a place to do this, it is here. The woman does it in front of millions of witnesses. This is a matter of record, and if this ""encyclopedia"" is to be construed as a ""record"", it needs to have the full story."

0

1

0

3

stop making crappy excuses cuz a few other station complex articles like broadway junction or times square port authority bus terminal do not mention exactly what trains stop where so your point and reverts are moot at best

0

1

REDIRECT User talk:NeonMerlin/archive 2

0

Vandalism Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Mike hawk) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

0

EXCUSE ME, but shouldn't you have warned the uploader first? Or is it customary for you to delete images wihout warning? I was the original uploader, and I protest!

0

Hi your name meant the cat 88.

0

Let us assume all that is accurate, meaning the side of President Kennedy's head was blown out above the right ear: What conclusions, if any, can be drawn from that?

0

The statement about the genome being different is disputed. A news article claims that it's related to the strain of a previous outbreak. — (talk)

0

Admin or Fascist? Just wondering, are you a Admin, a Fascist or both? So the only crap one can post on Liberalpedia is crap from God-hating liberal sites? You undid two links of mine because they actually are based on what the Bible says? What a sad LITTLE boy you are.69.14.97.53

0

2

1

0

1

" Shiotani Teiko. And dozens and dozens more just like it. Hi. You created an article saying, in full: Shiotani Teiko (塩谷定好? しおたにていこう, 1899 - 1988) was a renowned Japanese photographer. Actually it's Teikō, not Teiko, and according to WP's silly rules we have to ignore his real name of Shiotani Teikō and instead call him Teikō Shiotani. But that's not the main problem, which is that he's described in just about the same way as Kuribayashi Satoshi (栗林慧? くりばやしさとし, born 1939) is a renowned Japanese photographer. Or indeed Watanabe Kanendo (渡辺兼人? わたなべかねんど, born 1947) is a renowned Japanese photographer. Or Orihara Kei (折原恵? おりはらけい, born 1948) is a renowned Japanese photographer. And so on and so on and so on. Which all means that somebody looking among Category:Japanese photographers is highly likely to land on a mere substub. I can count on my fingers the people likely to turn a half dozen or so of these substubs into articles. No, on my thumbs: User:Pinkville and myself. But he's busy and I am too. I'd rate the probability that more than half will be converted within a year to more than stubs at well under 1%. It's an interesting ""proof of bot concept"" exercise, but is it good for anything else? Tell you what: I'll match you one for one. You turn two of these into articles; I'll turn two into articles. You turn ten into articles; I'll turn ten into articles. How does that sound? That's a great challenge! You're on. – (talk) (random) OK then. Do tell me when you've done one, as I can't keep the whole damn lot on my watchlist. Well actually I can, but I lack the time and effort to put them onto my watchlist. Also, I'll be intercoursingly busy during the next month, so in the short/medium term I may only be able to match you up to ten. I'm sure I've got entire books by at least twenty of these substubbed people, so I ought to be able to do more. What's odd about the list are some conspicuous absences. (Not just people I think are good, but people who, rightly or wrongly, are celebrated and successful.) Asai Shinpei is one, and there are more though I can't think of them right now. Not that it's any of my business, really, but did you scarf the list from User:20th Century Art (Zenhan)'s page, or do something else? Yeah, I scraped from Zenhan. I'll let you know here, or on your talk page, when I have one ready. I don't think I can make any of them featured, but legitimately ""non-stub"" is the goal. All the best, – (talk) (random) Okay, here's my first. Ichiki Shiro. It's not much beyond a stub, but it's something. (It took an hour of research, and I think I found all the info that's anywhere on the web regarding Mr. Ichiki.) By the way, was I right in listing him as a Hatamoto? My sources say he was a retainer of the Daimyo (in the Edo period, of course), and I know that he spoke with his Daimyo, so he couldn't have been a Gokenin. But I don't think he was a warrior, so I don't know. So far as I can tell, all Togugawa retainers were either Gokenin or Hatamoto. Am I correct in my inference? – (talk) (random) Damn you're fast. Unfortunately I don't know squat about Tokugawa retainers and the like. On several occasions I've tried to interest myself in feudal history but have always fallen flat. I suppose I can't separate it from the hammily acted, cheesily lit TV period dramas I sometimes have to tolerate when at the in-laws'. LordAmeth might know. (And this photographer's right up Pinkville's street.) How's this for a progress indicator? Great! – (talk) (random) Yup, except for a number of factors, one of which is that it's problematical copyrightwise (or so I infer from a comment elsewhere by one User:Quadell). I've already chucked in one extra list, and I'll certainly add one more, and I may add one after that; perhaps it can then be described as an original creation. All this is delaying my editing of any article. Still, I'll get around to that too in time. I hope that I've no

0

" Nominations are not supposed to be written in alphabetical orders. When a housemate nominates two names the appear as 1st Nomination, 2nd Nomination. Only when the nominees are resulted, they are specified in alphabetical order. If you watch the show closely you will see that the pairs were nominated as ""We want to nominate Sampat and Sana"". Therefore Sampat's name has been introduced first and then Sana's in the table. chat "

0

", 25 October 2011 (UTC) Overagainst: I respectfully disagree, and that still doesn't mean that it should displace all other sources in the article. I also never wrote that this was a medical dictionary, I wrote that this is an encyclopedia article and as such should encapsulate, to the extent possible in a small space and for a lay audience, the current state of scientific understanding of vitamin D, which means that the order in which things appear in the article should be changed. I also explicitly stated I was against a separate section for ""dissenting opinions"", or ""other opinions"". I agree with Doc James we should preferentially include reviews and meta-analyses, but there are enough of those which contradict the IOM recommendations that it shouldn't be a problem to give this article the balance it deserves while maintaining a high standard. The point is that the article reads like somebody's agenda, in other words, it reads POV. The sources have been cherry-picked and the tone is against supplementation, which doesn't reflect the body of research. The article needs to be changed. 14:12"

0

" The efforts by Elonka, et. al., to ratify this laughable whitewash of an article are just ludicrous. There is utterly nothing ""neutral"" about what Wikipedia has puked out onto the Internet about Matt Sanchez. ref "

2

0

1

" Thank you for asking, A; I'm perfectly fine, no big deal, just ""growin' old ain't for sissies"" routine stuff. Thanks again, (Talk) "

0

" JdeJ, I understand your concerns fully, believe me. I would however prefer you request at WP:RFPP for unprotection so that a pair of fresh eyes can look at the article. ~ Riana ⁂ "

0

. This Jimmys exists only in anglosaxons countries. www.plymouthbrethren.org Shawn Abigail review on this sect

2

0

1

0

Talk page Do you know what the purpose of these talk pages is? To share views. Please, read also spam. 85.202.40.145 PS Block me if you dare. It's not what the point of editing Wikipedia though.

0

1