Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
154de28db354b62c
Don't take any notice of Blnguyen as he is just a vietnamese crook. Blnguyen even tried to deny that vietnamese people are just a bunch of unlawful cannabis farmers and criminals in the UK, Canada and other places, when all reports had been referenced. There is really no need to take notice of someone who is clearly sympathetic to evil criminals just because they are vietnamese and he is vietnamese. Blnguyen is incapable of taking a NPOV, and is probably a part of the vietnamese criminal network anyway. 81.132.63.38
0
0
0
0
0
0
154e8a2edecd4ff4
San Marino There should be some reference to the fact that San Marino was left out of the unification and the reasons for this. 141.166.226.105
0
0
0
0
0
0
15504e91722c78dc
" Looks good for now. Gotta go now, though. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
15505876c39bdcce
" Incorrect speedy deletion You were incorrect to speedy delete Category:Science and technology in Myanmar. Firstly, this is a first level national subcategory that it standard issue for every country in the world above the level of a microstate, and such categories should NEVER be deleted. It should have been fixed instead. Secondly, it is was empty, I suspect you have played into the hands of someone who takes a non-neutral stance on the Burma/Myanmar naming issue, and has abused process by emptying the category without following due process on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. I will be correcting your error later today when I have time. Actually, the discussion at the CFD you mentioned does seem to have clear concensus (no opposes, in fact), and this was just one of SEVERAL myanmar->burma categories that I deleted. Another user has removed all the articles from these categories and (I suppose) placed them into new categories as described in the CFD. Your message does not have the tone of a good faith communication which attempts to work together to improve this encyclopedia, but rather a chastisement after your mind is made up on the issue. Please be more mindful of your tone in messages to other users. As for ""I'm gonna fix... please ensure that your actions are per concensus, and not just how you WANT it. talk contribs "
0
0
0
0
0
0
155159d54f152663
Thanks I have a longtime amateur interest in history of modern Germany, and want to thank you for your major contributions to Wikipedia, which I have only now discovered. 04:09, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
15521554e7c98d10
Javier hernandez Can you please stop reverting every little thing that I do, get a life seriously and grow up
0
0
0
0
0
0
15526564aaab4870
Yep, working on a RFCU right now.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1553cc6d45e16430
" Simply, there isn't enough evidence to move it to anywhere else. The band's website header (and much of the rest of the site) says ""M.I.A."" , and this copy of Ink Disease (from when the band was actually still together) says the same. Meanwhile, their LP release on Alternative Tentacles has only two periods ""M.I.A"". Meanwhile, even R.E.M. aren't always credited as such (see latest album ). For anyone else coming to this RFM, please read the AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.I.A. (band) (2nd nomination) - it will tell you all you need to know. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1553f00a51176c31
WikiProject Travel and Tourism
0
0
0
0
0
0
15541dba8714b562
Given that you don't provide any actual content, but seem to spend all your time formatting articles and reverting people, I suppose I oughtn't expect you to understand that the vast majority of content on wikipedia starts off unsourced. Wikipedia moves forward by sourcing unsourced material, not by removing it. It certainly doesn't move forward by removing trivially verifiable information, like my Niger-Congo languages edit that you reverted, in which I merely added a statement that most of the languages of central, southern, and eastern Africa are Bantu. (I apologize for the vulgar edit summary in my revert. I was irritated. I stand by the contention made there that it was a total WP:POINT violation. )
0
0
0
0
0
0
15556dc44611166a
+Merger Online bookkeeping Merge - topics are closely related and can be merged.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1558bfe16b3f2309
" What do you mean I ""edited the link""? I was fully within my right to remove unsourced/unverified information about a living person. You should not have re-added it at all. Oh, and Soccerbase stats for this player in Greece are wrong. I shouldn't have to do your job for you. Snowman "
0
0
0
0
0
0
155a701701d9b667
There is proof of Africans in Meso Americahow widespread their cultural influence is, is debatable.
0
0
0
0
0
0
155c619e13d00fe3
Conflict interests Yes, you were right, I was blocked unfair by miika. It was a true case of interest conflict.
0
0
0
0
0
0
155ca7ffb7d72714
" It's good to click your links since is still working. This is mentioned in Ballot Access News as well which is well known 3rd party publication. It's significant because they used name and could do it again. (If someone else co-opted that name and they let them, then it would be historically relevant here.) If they called themselves the ""Silly Secessionist Party"" it also would be notable in the context of the sources covering it. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
155cf661a75c6083
" I tried to find an easy reference but ""psychiatric assessment"" does not seem to bring up much of relevance on the internet. Psychological assessment brings up psychological testing for the most part. I should look in my books. – (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
155cf7046ddfb68a
" Ultimatum - noun, a final demand or statement of terms, the rejection of which will result in retaliation or a breakdown in relations. So you want some specific person to put their foot down, and demand something of you, otherwise they'll throw a hissy-fit? Weird. Who is this person you're referring to? By the way, if you read the previous sections instead of just starting new ones every few hours you'll see that this question has come up before several times... just to be ignored by you. Propose this section be removed per wp:TALK (""Deleting material not relevant to improving the article (per the above subsection #How to use article talk pages)"" is permitted). Stop creating new discussion sections with new topics as soon as someone replies to you. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
155e058d0cafff2f
" Comment - I found this very interesting; that is not a common term in the United States. Here, ""Macintosh"" is primarily associated a variety of apple. I bet most people here don't even know ""Mac"", with regard to the computer, is short for ""Macintosh"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
155ec5eccc6b7e1f
They bought it from the natives for things that, if American dollars existed back then, would be worth $24.
0
0
0
0
0
0
155f0d1a3641c408
? You know I'm kind of a poser online. I'm not nearly this nice in real life.
0
0
0
0
0
0
156065176332d669
"::Root's screenshot is exactly how it looks for me (monobook and latest Google Chrome). | Penny for your thoughts? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1561824b3441be19
" Well, it never said the move was complete. And again, announcement from official club website is not a primary source if that's what you mean. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1561d2c1a2fe5825
Atren, is this your blog? http://weinerwatch.blogspot.com/
0
0
0
0
0
0
1561fe5ffc8a19f5
Cherokee Language Wikipedia
0
0
0
0
0
0
156260f86e6e3c06
" National Archives ExtravaSCANza You are invited to the National Archives ExtravaSCANza, taking place every day next week from January 4–7, Wednesday to Saturday, in College Park, Maryland (Washington, DC metro area). Come help me cap off my stint as Wikipedian in Residence at the National Archives with one last success! This will be a casual working event in which Wikipedians are getting together to scan interesting documents at the National Archives related to a different theme each day—currently: spaceflight, women's suffrage, Chile, and battleships—for use on Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons. The event is being held on multiple days, and in the evenings and weekend, so that as many locals and out-of-towners from nearby regions1 as possible can come. Please join us! ·t 1 Wikipedians from DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newark, New York City, and Pittsburgh have been invited."
0
0
0
0
0
0
156332ddbad069fb
If that was an iPhone, you might be interested in a great solution to this; see here if you are interested. It works very well for me. (talk – )
0
0
0
0
0
0
1563528bebbadfb5
kindly put this article forward for consideration. He's not a regular contributor to the article so I'm not sure if he'll be around to respond to any issues raised. If not, I'm happy to make any changes necessary.
0
0
0
0
0
0
15639d1de3548f66
Thank you ! About Sorin Cerin.Is unacceptable what hapening with Sorin Cerin.Please se the contrib. page. open by Jmabel.
0
0
0
0
0
0
15644891946ac63e
" Speedy deletion of User talk:68.179.178.210 Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
15653e7a7439b1c4
" WikiWomen's Collaborative WikiWomen Unite! Hi ! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! Can't wait to have you involved! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1566b78282df33c2
I think this article is a little biased.... I don't particularly recall the old format being hugely popular. I do know that I love 88.3's current format. I can almost always turn it on and find a song I know.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1566bdf41fe6ec0f
THE PERSON WHOSE EDITS YOU REVERTED HY. I JUST WANT TO TELL YOU THAT YOU CAN'T BAN ME. PROXIES ARE VERY NICE. AREN'T THEY? NOW FUCK YOU.
1
0
1
0
1
0
1566f803f852ef03
Calabasas, California Avoid using wp:puffery in articles. Thank you
0
0
0
0
0
0
156701814bd0e99b
Plus the French championships as it was had never been referred to as the championships similarly the USO has never been reffered to as the National Championships pre-open era. Logic's going out the window here.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1567b68b2cc4ee9e
" When I give the exact things that need to be removed, you don't have to ""look"" for unencylopedic material, you just delete the things already mention. If you anted to improve the encyclopedia the list is already there, just follow the directions. If not, well then whatever. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
156852832e6c1c7c
SEZ YOU, YOU ANNOYING EDITOR!
1
0
0
0
0
0
1568541da87aef73
There seems to be a pan neo-conservatist gang-banging pervading not to mention perverting the objective real politik of this Scoop Jackson article. Desist from your neo-conservatist pigeon-holing of the late Senator as there is a severe lack of objective verifiable evidence to support your spurious claims. Third party authors with a poltical agenda are not verifiable sources in my book so desist from this pigeon-holing forthwith
0
0
0
0
0
0
1568d9fdaa66738c
Please leave your comments with your sign, Thank you
0
0
0
0
0
0
156a9653342377d7
" Way to elevate the discussion. I see you're a member of the ""my way or the highway"" club. Have you ever considered contributing to Conservapedia? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
156aa72813218735
"==Ongoing issue== Several editors have expressed concern at your edits to the Spirit of St. Louis article. Reviewing the case, I agree that the edit seriously skews the statement to a non-neutral point of view. The difference between ""first"" and ""first solo"" is a very major one, IMHO, and cannot be allowed into the article as-is. Alcock and Brown clearly make the first non-stop flight, by removing the word ""solo"" you are creating a false statement in the article. This is a serious problem. I see several attempts to discuss the matter both here on your talk page and in the Talk:Spirit_of_St._Louis talk page, but I have seen no responses from you to date. This is another important wikipedia policy; change is fine, even radical change, but if it results in controversy you should address the concerns. Simply put, you have not done so. I don't want to harsh out here, but I do need to make sure the message is clear: unless you have a good explaination, and tell us what it is, any further edits to re-include this change will be treated as vandalism and result in a blocking of your editing privileges. If you really feel that this change is minor, and accurate, then you need to address the concerns brought forth by the other editors first. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
156bfb0a7c38e2ca
i think you'll find you are edit waring too so fuck you how dare you swear at me
1
0
1
0
1
0
156c253d3eccc0fc
This is a farce: The Nervous Mermaid is wholly interested in Ralph Nader and has not commented on any other article in Wikipedia except for Seasons & a Muse, Inc, an article that has had only two contributors, one of whom, not coincidentally, is 76.166.123.129, who is often a commentator on the Ralph Nader article. Meanwhile, there's Telogen, who only comments on Ralph Nader and one other article, Jeanne Marie Spicuzza, an article which also happens to be visited extremely often by user 76.166.123.129. Would you guys cut this out? The only evidence of conspiracy is that which you're creating. It appears there are several editors, myself included, who disagree with your position, so you're resorting to personal attacks. You're removing editors' contributions that are sourced and accurate. You're admittedly trolling these editors' histories, then attacking them, which is, by Wikipedia standards, bad faith. The fact is, I've contributed to various articles, some of which have existed for years. Conspiracy? Illuminati? No. Please stop the personal attacks. Accept that your argument is unpersuasive and move on. We can work together, respectfully. It will only serve to make Wikipedia as accurate and educational as it can be. Shouldn't that be the goal?
0
0
0
0
0
0
156ca9bc4440dcfc
" not an attack dear jeff, I had this message removed, it is not an attack but I do want an apology for your behaviour. listen buddy, I don't know what that email you sent me was, but Idon't like that sort of talk coming into my house - you might like to watch ""robo-babes"" and other ""fleshhoneys"" doing depraved things and putting opbjects into them, but me and my family certainly don't . Now it so happens that was a SHARED email address - one that all my family use, and the idea that my daughter could have gone onto the email and looked at pictures like that makes me heartily sick. and the fact htat you're some kind of responsible man on the wikipedia. I used to have faith in wikipedia, I used to think it was a useful thing, but to get an email from you, linked to this website, and all the pictures you attached - not to mention the links to all sorts of faces splattered in the worst kind of bodily fluids and excretions... this mighht be your chance to turn the enciclopedia into a den of perversion and pornography. It's not that there were the pictures on here - I can understandf if I wanted to look an article about some kind of deviant practice - but why would you send that to me here? you should be stripped of the medals you have so proudly on your page - in the army we used to have a word for people like you and I wouldn't want to print it here. If i dont get an apology this goes right to the top."
0
0
0
0
0
0
156d0da8576ebbba
" The legislation is quite clear: ""(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he— (a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or (b)causes any such message or matter to be so sent.(2)A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he— (a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false, (b)causes such a message to be sent; or (c)persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.(3)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both."" No mention of single v multiple communications or 12 weeks maximum. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
156d55ab68cc5c30
" Take a look at Neutral point of view and the notability guidelines for companies. and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
156e1717a88fcf1e
2011 Report into Defence Procurement I added a note on the publication of one of Carrie's reports, on a set of proposals for reform of certain aspects of defence procurement. The note was removed on the basis that since he has written many such reports there was no need to single out one. I didn;t know that, but I'm not convinced about this argument. Firstlt, the report is, in itself, notable, since it later became the basis of a piece of legislation, which will affect government spending of about £4Bn a year. Secondly, would it not be better, rather than not mentioning any of his reports that have been commissioned by government, to try and list all of them? I'm happy to do such a list. Thoughts?
0
0
0
0
0
0
156e2670c28f8e62
" DYK for 2000 Sugar Bowl On 4 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with from the article 2000 Sugar Bowl, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Thank you for your contributions! - Cheers, "
0
0
0
0
0
0
156eb658077ed117
Arthur, I haven't edited the article at all, ever. Given that the SPLC is a reliable source, BLP doesn't figure into this. So when someone violates WP:3RR and I report them, it'll be up to neutral admins not you to rule on whether the BLP exception is involved. I wouldn't bet any money on them approving this exception.
0
0
0
0
0
0
156ec0972d1b05f9
" I am coming late to this but I am unaware of any Muslim group that rejects Khadija as the first convert. The story of Muhammad's reception of the first revelation and his immediate flight in terror to hide weeping beneath Khadija's robe is a beloved tradition. While the authenticity of the many ahaadith is debated, this event is considered a crucial part of his revelation. I think the introduction ""According to Muslim traditions"" perfectly suits this situation, given that the event is only recorded by Muslims. I would be interested if anyone knows of a competing tradition, because admittedly this is not my speciality. Also, Happy Mevlüt to y'all. '''''' smash! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
156f0c3d9e243a4f
" I think the definition of test-and-set ""If the test fails, the value is not set."" may have need some correction. According to ""Operation System Concepts"" By Abraham Silberschatz, etc. , in page 198 about the definition of TestAndSet instruction. The test and set operations are always executed no matter the test fails or not..."
0
0
0
0
0
0
156f84c4b9052ca5
Hey white person, you suck. Stop being so white. Nigger pride. -(non-white person)
1
0
1
0
1
1
156fddfcbd1e69a6
" A case of undue weight at the VERY LEAST. This article is not titled ""Denial of genocides in history"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
156fec38a33f72b9
conflict of interest== Tvoz, you have stated your opposition to the article. Please stop editing it for a week. Then nominate it and propose that it be killed off and explain why. It is a conflict of interest to oppose and article and do things that some hard working editors think is not helpful. Only those who support the article should edit. Then after a few days, everyone can express an opinion if it is a joke article or a genuine article. If the article is killed, then be happy. If it is retained, then you can improve it in ways you think it can be improved. ==
0
0
0
0
0
0
15705b7b8ae2b971
Don;t mind Freepsbane he is just a troll that looks for trouble.
0
0
0
0
0
0
15708afa85919b81
The Med Im currently using Pagurus bernhardus for my dissertation and haven't yet read anything yet that mentions this particular species being found in the Med. I have however read a few papers that claim its range is limited to the Atlantic coast of Portugal in the south.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1570a812634c7056
" We need a free picture ASAP. Did nobody take a good picture of her during any of her concerts or backstage? '''' (0_o) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
15715f88f556c0f8
Oh, okay. Fair enough, then. Thanks for making the effort to explain, to fill in my curiosity.
0
0
0
0
0
0
157282532efe7f28
the source, so that the ambiguity can be further dissipated by an easier read of
0
0
0
0
0
0
1572a6f4ab679793
Reliable sources Hi ! I put this information on the Earth article talk page. It's some sources I found. Which one should we use? I'm so glad you're still with me on this. We rock!
0
0
0
0
0
0
1572ac459dcd0b12
Educate yourself. [commodities]. Money is one of them. Donations to hate groups are donations to hate groups, period.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1572b0bc80ce0ef8
Took y'all long enough. BTW, left a clue. You might want to examine things closely. 88.104.33.134
0
0
0
0
0
0
1573237c5110bf64
I've rewritten it to be NPOV and removed the tag. Codman's contributions would be great if he could just drop the wild eyed greenie tone of his edits. I'm also getting weary of this view he is pushing that he is more knowledgable than everyone else when he is clearly a complete n00b when it comes to making encyclopedic contributions. / (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
1574a91fce3a866c
" I'll show you the relevance of them, WP:AN3#User:Geoeg reported by User:dicklyon (Result: Both blocked for 6 hours) dicklyon and Geoeg have been disagreeing about an article where WP:COI is a concern. Since dicklyon reported Geoeg for 3RR, he/she is focusing negative attention on Geoeg. Why is this not harassment? WP:AN/I#SPA Milto LOL pia pointed out a concern about a WP:SPA editor, also focusing negative attention on them. Why is this not harassment? WP:COIN#SPAs and socks pushing POV, PR, and advertising on the Chapman_University_School_of_Law Page This also focuses negative attention, not totally unlike what I said Justanother has done. Why is this not harassment? You seem to buy into Bishonen's belief that I am out to get Justanother and thereby assume anything I bring up must be part of that campaign. You are wrong, in this case he was being disruptive while other editors were genuinely trying to resolve a dispute. If this isn't being disruptive, all that needs to be done is give a brief explanation why answers like this are acceptable: Q:Using reliable sources, should this article have a section discussing Hubbard's personality? A:Rephrase:' Should a one-sided, POV analysis of Hubbard's ""personality"" based on a small number of critical sources and bordering on WP:OR synthesis be posted in the article as a ""work in progress"" or should a balanced, NPOV, and non-OR piece be developed in a sandbox by interested parties from all sides of the issue. Which one benefits the project? There, that is a more accurate statement of the issue. Please put your assumptions about what you think I'm doing and ask yourself if the arbcom meant to give Justanother a free pass from having to abide by any rules that I happen to point out? For crying out loud by your logic I couldn't report ANY violation of policy by him whether it's valid or not. Does that really make sense to you? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1574feb2fffa7021
" Offensiveness is immaterial. Your sig is in violation of WP:SOAP. Similar signatures have been required to change in the past. Please change it. Thank you. //   (copied across from my talk) I concur with Roux. WP:SOAP says: Having such a line in your signature only serves two purposes: The obvious case (ie the literal), in which case your statement violates WP:SOAP To offend atheists or people of other religions, in which case your signature is divisive, and is not permitted (whilst it may serve this purpose, I understand it probably wasn't intended.) About 2 billion people are Christians - that means over two thirds of people living in the world do not believe the same thing as you, and will potentially be offended (like I was, and am). It is not an appropriate thing to have in a signature. — (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
157694ab4311ff09
'preciate it. But we seem to have a vandalism problem directed not at words but at ideas and contributions.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1576ce2d8a7fed5f
"Yes I'm finding it tiresome too. I don't want the wording to say ""requested"". The wording on the UK Web Site Consortium says clearly ""This site was selected for preservation by the British Library."" I therefore feel that quoting the exact words from the Consortium's web site should be entirely acceptable. 81.155.184.66 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
15776b1179c093d0
" WWE Legends of WrestleMania Per consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 65#Roster in wrestling articles, only a summary prose should be used. Not a list.CO "
0
0
0
0
0
0
15781827f812a3d3
" (This post placed here ""19:35, 26 September 2005 Grazon"" who does not sign his/her postings on Wikipedia) I don't understand what you mean political beliefs - are you implying that I am taking the opposite side of this argument because Harding is a Republican, ergo, I feel the need to protect him? I'm sticking up for the man because I have looked at primary resources and know what they say and what they do not contain - which is any inkling of Klan involvement. What I can't figure out is why is it so important for you include Harding in the Klan, that you would base you whole argument on what one book claims. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
15783a4eac797e9e
He could have been dead before this event. The fact is there is no picture, there is simply the United States of America claims. WIkipedia is bending its own rules to spread US propaganda, how ironic.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1578a5e86cfc8a7d
WTMM and WEEV Thanks of taking care of this for me. I wasn't exactly sure how the new wikilinking would work with the change in station frequency and callsign. 19:35,2 January 2007(UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
157946f204f29f08
" ARE YOU FUCKING RETARDED? TAB Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Solaris (2002 film). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Ali TAB TAB What the fuck is your problem. Did you even read what I deleted? TAB TAB DO you know what the word PLOT means? TAB TAB Plot does NOT mean talking about the movie's trailer or what genre the movie it is. A plot is a SUMMARY of the movie. TAB TAB Read what's in the Plot section of ""solaris"" right now you fucking retard and tell me if it really belongs under the section plot... or any other section. It looks more like trivial facts which are unsupported and should be DELETED as per wiki regulations. TAB TAB Here's an example, dumb fuck, from the solaris wiki page: TAB TAB ""The film essentially ignores the planet which only serves as an anonymous backdrop, in contrast to Lem's novel which discusses at length the mysterious phenomena on its surface and the futile human attempts to understand them."" TAB TAB That is NOT neutrality and has NOTHING to do with the plot. TAB TAB Jesus FUCKInG CHRIST. Wiki is full of fucking morons. TAB TAB Delete that shit. TAB "
1
0
1
0
1
0
15799af5d01cc9a9
Ah, good, a little negotiation. How about this, I give you and Slick two weeks to improve articles, that seems more reasonable. Also, if you want my cooperation, I want you to stop framing me as a sockpuppet, I expect that courtesy. I do not need your reasoning and pleas though, I follow Wikipedia policies. If I find it unnotable, I will nominate it in two weeks, simple as that. It may not be positive for you, but for Wikipedia it is part of existence. This, as I have said already, has nothing to do with you personally, you just happen to write many of the articles of the same scope. I have restrained my anger over the lack of notability in those articles for long enough, so this has to be done. Ta-ta.
0
0
0
0
0
0
157a2b89bc462925
" The debate is divided, to an unusual degree, between science and opinion. There is a lot of opinion, much of it very strong, without any close relationship to the science. Helmets became gospel in the USA by 1991 according to the LAB, before any significant science came out, and the debate and the science have proceeded along distinctly separate tracks. A current example is the comment put in by "
0
0
0
0
0
0
157c7e5ea02f4851
" I tried to add a page for the Green Corridor project, but I am new to Wikipedia. From the deletion long, it is indicated as a copyright violation. As the information was gathered from the Green Corridor's website, www.greencorridor.ca, I was unsure how to cite the entire page. It was my mistake to ""save"" the page, my ignorance led me to believe this was saving the page, but not publishing it. If I can appropriately cite the website as a source, will I be able to resubmit the entry? Or, do the facilitator's of the project need to make the entry through their own account? Thanks for your help "
0
0
0
0
0
0
157e642a6eff3367
"|decline=You don't seem to understand the conflict of interest presented by you creating an article for someone that you work for. I'd suggest you use the remaining time in your block to review the relevant Wikipedia policies on this, which can be found here. – (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
157ed05fed7f1d77
the Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team wants You! Hi Morphh, I saw some of your contributions on an article that falls within the scope of Wikiproject: United States Public Policy, (Taxation in the U.S.) you seem to have a lot edits and expertise in policy and economics, and I was hoping you would be interested in assessing articles with the Public Policy Initiative. There is more info about assessment on the 9/13/2010 Signpost. If you're interested or just curious you can sign up on the project page or just contact me. Thanks!
0
0
0
0
0
0
157ef0558cc43dae
Vandalism and Lies Chinamanjoe (aka [Justin Besant]) has been spreading lies throughout wikipedia. He is not a popular solo artist throughout Canada and neither is the Cortez Trio. He is a high school student who wants his name out there. Look at the facts, he claims to be the great-nephew of [Annie Besant] however if that were true he would be at least 90 years old. I find it difficult to believe a 90+ year old would still be producing new albums all with nonsensical names and touring Canada. This should not be tolerated. For a current picture of him refer to the Justin Besant last.fm website.
0
0
0
0
0
0
157f2296a5b0b956
" Tero Kinnunen I can't say this any other way that to be blunt: you seriously restored a deleted article three years after the PROD because an IP gave the word ""reasoning"" as reason to restore? I'm going ot AfD it, but to me, the whole scenario is ridiculous. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
157f33486791b8f3
first off it is not vandalism, the number changed. Second, be careful how you speak to me.
0
0
0
0
0
0
157faa0bc3c918dc
Message Fine. Is it okay to type Chuckie got killed because he's an evil man? (99.88.78.94 ).
0
0
0
0
0
0
157ffb7bc173b642
SIPRI reference at here. You seem to be having trouble using it. To obtain the required data, find Sweden from the first list, then click on Add. Find India in the second list, then click on the 2nd Add button next to it on the right. The select the range, say from 1960 to 2011 from the drop-down menu. Then select the weapon type - in the case of Bofors, select Artillery. The chose either of the 2 options Suppliers or recipients, and click on Download. An MS Excel file with the desired info would be downloaded. Please remember that SIPRI is the most reliable reference in case of military arms/trade related information. Thanks! | talk | contrib
0
0
0
0
0
0
158042855ea67ed9
" Anonymous Editing on Wikipedia Keeps Morgellons Sufferers in the Dark As cited from: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/5/prweb10707772.htm ""what the public does not realize is that Wikipedia is posing as a genuine source of knowledge, the accuracy of their information is greatly lacking and it is vulnerable to manipulation through editing by anonymous special interest groups."" Lots of astroturfing here on Wikipedia."
0
0
0
0
0
0
15805fa7814ca296
The Hugo Boss Prize is a clothing company art award? Whoa.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1581efd8f4f07b03
I am making you mentally ill I am the mentally ill vandal.
1
0
0
0
0
0
15824394697157cc
Q1, no, because people searching for information on Barack Obama right now are not going to be searching for information about this with a greater than 90% probability. However as far as popular culture and the average citizen are concerned, this event IS john g roberts. anybody looking for information on him right now is almost certainly after it because of this event. and this event is how most americans will remember him. Q2, i doubt it, obama probably doesn't want to be reminded of that silly event. however its inclusion is not up to them as they are the interested parties...we are supposed to decide as objective editors. the fact remains this is the most significant well known even for which jgr will ever be known for. so it should be in the lead.
0
0
0
0
0
0
15842253ade953fc
Articles are not meant to be trolled, I don't care you're admin, I've been on Wikipedia for years.
0
0
0
0
0
0
158492d6baaec0b7
Toddst1 I would like to disabuse you of the notion that I am in any way harassing anyone. I have asked Gwen Gale a straight question about a editor block which merits an equally straight response. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
158555a773b461aa
Siberian Kyiv Post Goble, Sept 8 duplicate Georgian Daily, Goble, oct 12 Radio Free Europe oct 14 Kyiv Post Goble, oct 18 Sofia Echo Georgian Daily, Goble, oct 27 Moscow Times, critical of it; oct 28 Other: Sibiryak - the Unknown Nationality
0
0
0
0
0
0
15862ffa429142ce
" unblock and clear log "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1586dfc65a859a3b
This is what happens to anti-Semites like you.
1
0
0
0
0
0
158705e58cc34894
" Image copyright Hi Matthew,since I've now twice ( ) used your user page as an example, I just wanted to let you know that a number of images you have on your user page probably claim an incorrect copyright status (along with thousands of others). No need to do anything at this point, I'm not yet sure what we're going to need to do about that (if anything), just letting you know. Actually, I'd prefer if you kept them all up so that I could continue to use them as an example. ) Initial discussion is at User talk:Moonriddengirl#Commissioned work, if you're interested, but will probably move to WP:MCQ sooner or later.Cheers, Amalthea "
0
0
0
0
0
0
15883643ba771522
Involved parties , filing party Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request Diff. 1 Diff. 2 Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried Link 1 Link 2 Statement by {Party 1} Statement by {Party 2} Statement by {Party 3} Clerk notes This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks. Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
158a82cf717043f4
it's raining, and i don't have an umbrella, will you rush it a little bit...
0
0
0
0
0
0
158b2ef85dfc77bb
Alex Crockford as Charlie It says on IMDB that Alex Crockford will reprise his role as Charlie Weasley in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1. I added this to the article with a reference and everything but it was deleted. Why is this? The reference exists here http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1472349/
0
0
0
0
0
0
158b4134cd21dcaa
" If world renowned academic publishers cannot be trusted for simple uncontentious facts then who can. We are not claiming that homeopathy is the one true medicine. We are simply claiming that there is a thing called homeopathy, and in homeopathy there is a treatment called Thuja which uses Thuja occidentalis in its preparation. All of this can be verified easily by entering ""thuja"" and ""homeopathy"" into google. It is far from clear what your point is. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
158c65a4a5d485b6
What I have been considering is moving this page to the more accurate and clear title of Characters of Negima (students 1-15) (and the same with 16-31).
0
0
0
0
0
0
158d44278a9a87d4
I think Alex had it planned from the beginning to form some sort of group page on a user space page to make it clear that we were working in a group. Possibly having some sort of template on all of our user pages may be a good idea, as I am a wiki sysop for other websites, and I try to do things to minimize the look of conspiracy or sock puppetry. I will remind everyone to keep as much communication as possible on this site, to prevent appearance of sock puppetry or conspiracy. Also, just because you say you don't communicate with other users who come to your defense, highly conveniently, as I have been told, as there are many other ways to communicate off of this website; I keep this in mind when dealing with other users and policy on the websites I administrate. I think it's important to add that I don't agree with a lot of what Alex says, and that I'm not here to be a robot for her cause. I may consider myself independent from her group for this reason.
0
0
0
0
0
0
158ea2d698026c2c
www.skyscrapers.com lists it as 293 and that is the correct height - b1link82
0
0
0
0
0
0
159054d2beb868e8
" Editing of Anthony Hungerford Dear Phillip, My comments regarding your editing of this site are not hostility, they are upset! I have only ever place three entries onto Wikipadia, and am the first to acknowledge that I have not made myself fully aware to the protocols of the site. After some 30 years of researching my ancestry, my primary aim was to share the information garnered on those few individuals who have been somewhat prominent in history. My upset comes from the fact that the editing was not sympathetic. You seem to have just wiped the article and started again. The upshot was that instead of leaving the information on the page [after all it has been there for some time-what is the rush to change it?] and asking for clarification, certain aspects just disappeared. If I understand it correctly, it seems that Wikipedia prefers to quote as a source from the Calendars of State Papers – because a contributor to DNB or ODNB [a secondary source] has seen it, and delete my other quote from the Calendar of State Papers with source reference-because I have seen it personally in a printed book of the Calendars? Likewise, as I mentioned to you in my email, it was obvious that the authors of both the old DNB and the ODNB did not actually know the origins of Colonel Hungerford-they both speculated. Whereas my later research had got nearer to the truth with my finding details given by Colonel Hungerford to the Ulster Herald, when he arrived in Ireland with his Regiment –which you confirmed with the full reference – •TABDublin: National Library of Ireland, Genealogical Office: Ms.45, pp.59-60: ""Certificate of Arms to Col. Anthony Hungerford of Marson in Wiltshire and his pedigree. He arrived with his Regiment in D]ublin, April 30, 1647."" •TABDublin: National Library of Ireland, Genealogical Office: Ms.45, p.62 Certificate of Arms and cadency to Ensign St. John Hungerford, third brother of and ensign to Col. Anthony Hungerford, May 12, 1647. I apologise if I have been too harsh in my comments to you, but you must understand that it was basic sourced information, which at the time was not on the internet, that I was seeking to share with Wikipedia readers, not style, rules and display. I hope you have not finished with your editing. If you require any further clarifications please contact me. 212.140.128.142 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1590908621ce4c4a
September 2007 (UTC)|Section §.> 07:27, 15
0
0
0
0
0
0