id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15076fcfb70134c0
|
The vast majority of comments there agree that Wikifan12345 has caused disruption on a number of articles. Nobody except for you has proposed that I be blocked. How can you block me with no basis whatsoever in the discussion? How can you possibly think that this is correct?
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150819cce615d1f0
|
Her ethnicity/Black?
Isn't her father Black? Just want to make sure before we add ethnicity categories.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1508b815317f517c
|
Shitush
Shitush: who are you?
You are blatantly against Yadav's and this is horrible.
I want to speak with your supervisor.
Your derogatory language is unacceptable. Why do you enjoy such defamation?
Because your inferior self has the power to control some webpage you automatically become the ruler. You're worldly knowledge is sub-par. Please join the rest of us in the 21st century in our struggle for equality.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1509eb3e830e325a
|
It's the truth
I am one!!
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150a079d38c7a8a4
|
Question
Hey Tombseye, just wondering if you could add your email address to your account. You can do that by going to Special:Preferences. I need to send you something.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150a83d7bb1679f0
|
I said no such thing. Please don't put words in my mouth, especially offensive ones. I was referring to lesser animals, like, for instance, being reincarnated as a cockroach for sins in a former life.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150aa4f7e64e6295
|
"
Cole & Dylan
Ok, I just watched the whole video and nowhere in it does anyone say anything about ADD. All the video was about was something called Habbo (which I guess is some website) and an interview the boys did that consisted of your basic, run of the mill fangirl questions. If there is something about ADD in there, it must in some kind of code that my old ass can't decipher, but I heard no such admission. As for using YouTube as a source, I wouldn't accept it as one. I don't know if there is a policy about YouTube not being used, but I tend to replace YouTube links anyway because they are forever removing videos and if something is true and noteworthy, there would be more than just a video source. In this case, I found nothing else to back up the ADD claim. Perhaps the person who wants to include it should give find a secondary source because the one provided doesn't back up the content. You were right to remove it and it is a BLP issue at this point which means it needs to go until it is properly sourced. Say it... "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150ca38340edf843
|
ZRH vandal
Hello The Banner, there is an anononymous user )
is continually vandalizing Zurich Airport. I ask you if you can do something paese, because after my and other user revision of his edits, he continue vandalizing the page.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150ddaa18ef3c847
|
"::::::See http://www.richarddawkins.net/articles/4757-brief-scientific-autobiography Richard Dawkins says, ""In 1943 my father was posted back to Nyasaland"".
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1510286a6fe0b0f9
|
"
Deleting old username
Hi Scetoaux, I was wondering if I could change my old signature here to my present username. I'm trying to get rid of all my sigs from that old username. Thanks! Mountain5 "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1510d69062342cbc
|
"
I'm sorry, but you must have gotten the wrong person. There is no block evasion here, nor was I trying to hurt anyone. I was attacked by Daedalus969 for ""knowing WP rules too well""... and I expressed my honest opinion about his edit history. He assumed bad faith from the get-go, so I replied in a similar manner. Still, if you think I was the aggressive party I will simply ignore any possible attack on me. I think if you examine my edit history you can easily see that I'm here to edit articles and not at all interested in this drama. Please reply ASAP. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1510f3f64737c070
|
, 17 January 2015 (UTC)|decline=The IP address you're using has been blocked, because it acts like a proxy server or cloud computer provider. While we could grant you IP Block Exemption, this would only be done if there was an actual need for you to edit from this IP address. 21:00
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151190157ba64f34
|
Thats from me to! I just dont want to put to on here. ()
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1511f2d92e54b962
|
Clanwilliam Cedar or Clanwilliam Cyprus
The tree is generally known as the Clanwilliam Cedar, even though botanically it should be called a cyprus. Which should be used on this page? I believe that the common name should be used in the article, with a short explanation of the technically correct name.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1512cbda16d29972
|
"
Vienna
Dude, seriously. WP:RS and WP:V don't get thrown out the window just because Mary Jo Foley of microsoft-watch.com provides an unattributable and unverifiable quote from a so-called ""spokesman"" about the change in name. Nobody at Microsoft with a name has bothered to come out and say ""Yes, the name is Vienna"" in the last few days. Doesn't that strike you as somewhat odd? We can trace back the origin of almost every other recent code name to a blog entry by a developer team, or a page on Microsoft's web site. Not this time. I'm not going to bother with renaming back to Windows Blackcomb, since you'll probably change it back to Vienna without bothering with that nagging Wikipedia requirement of verifiability. This isn't a race.
Okay... What's the point of these constant reverts back to Blackcomb? I'm really sure now that the codename is ""Vienna"". The change was recent, let's not make a big deal of it not being mentioned everywhere. No offense, but you seem to like the name Blackcomb much better than Vienna. Get over it. It was changed. Now it wasn't only Scoble who confirmed it. My guess is they were trying to keep it secret for some reason. Several sources claim it's ""Vienna"", so let's keep it that way. There were rumours about ""Longhorn"" being changed to ""Vista"", but later it was confirmed. Let's just leave the article alone for right now. — "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151361dacfddb23c
|
I have to check my figures, but I think that the current suggestion of drinking 25 tons only gives one about a 60% chance of consuming at least one molecule of the original material. Perhaps we should mention this probability to make it clear we are not completely stupid.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1515a85159b4d961
|
Inventor or Developer
A recent addition was made to the article about a supposed early developer of the capsule endoscope. It needed a reference, so I reverted to an earlier version. Normally, I'd add a citation tag but the editor himself made various claims about capsule endoscopy inventors and how he himself had a problem with mentions of such people without references. I thought that was odd. If there is a reference, I'd be happy to add it, but from my research there seems to be conflicts among many as to who first created it. -
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1515f5df7288a061
|
Strong arguments
To summarise, it is spelled as Kyiv in English language because:
1) Ukrainian government insists on Kyiv spelling
2) The State Department of the U.S. issued a directive to write Kyiv
3) The Prime Minister of the U.K. calls the city Kyiv
4) United Nations Multilingual Terminology Database (the ultimate body on geographical names) approved it as Kyiv
5) Major English speaking governments worldwide switched to Kyiv spelling
6) CIA refers to the city as Kyiv
7) The name of the famous football club is Dynamo Kyiv
8) Many papers, e.g., British The Guardian, are already writing Kyiv
9) All major Canadian media already use the spelling of Kyiv
10) and many more reasons http://kyiv.of-cour.se/
( )
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151666a5170478a5
|
Wikipedia:The Problem with Projects
Actually, to the best of my knowledge, the essay in question is not a proposed policy or guideline, and nowhere says anything remotely similar. It is, as it stated, a series of personal observations. Kindly learn to apply AGF a little more frequently to your actions. Thank you.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15168afec4deabe3
|
Very nice! I suggest putting in a link, to the autobiographical section which, I presume, you've helped write. Taking care,
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1516dac19bb0a2ad
|
May I refer you once more to WP:MOSDASH. As I spend time researching and writing up team tables for the season pages, I check the wikilinks and tidy up info boxes etc on the way. It's comforting to know someone is following along in my wake and reverting some of my efforts.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151708b6870732df
|
"assume that anarchism is not a form of it as it does not mean governments are harmful and unnecessary, but states are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.131.12.28 "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15183c841430b804
|
Just like how Australia is now mainly Caucausian... or Singapore is predominantly ethnically Chinese.. just that the UAE won't hand out citizenship that generously...
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15184caa6c172944
|
Hey, douche
I'm back! Hahaha, this is gonna be fun!
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
15195bffa9b28703
|
Hi and welcome - nice bird images you've added. 17:31, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1519b7a2706db9bc
|
We're making progress, but I'm still not sure that even the footnote should even be there. It's from a message board, and I don't think that fits WP:RS.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151aa1666765c07e
|
Ludwig Gaston von Sachsen tranlsation
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151b6bc78d156247
|
REDIRECT User talk:Bkonrad/Archive 23
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151b75f67bccf733
|
Yet more red tape
I hereby officially and formally request mediation with one
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151bb656de47b9bd
|
It's time for you to disengage Arzel. You're really in the wrong here.v/r - P
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151bc2f8574e35d1
|
>>>I second your non-ironic awe. Excellent work. Thanks.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151be81b310b097d
|
Yep, you got it Gdo01, that is a second account. I am no longer blocked so stop harassing by watching my ever single move, it is really annoying. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151ea69b8cae6462
|
"
Your request at Files for upload
Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:Biblical Theological Seminary logo.jpg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, '''''''''' "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151ebc30bc8a4d42
|
20
retards u fuckin paki fuckersItalic textfukin taliban
== fuck u
== fuck u again
fuck u even more
==
==
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
151fb550a81410d3
|
"
OK, no reordering. But can we give them designations, like this? I'm calling it ""List A"" so we can start a new list later without confusion. If you don't like it we'll work something else out, but we really need some way to refer to issues without saying, ""Hey, getting back to that thing we were talking about, the bit where it says that Gage was traveling, not the bit about the time when he blah blah blah.""
One point: we absolutely cannot refer to ""Note X"" and ""Ref 22"" and so on. These designations shift around as the article is edited and we will go completely crazy. In the below, I've substituted permalinks instead.
Issues list ""A""
A1 Background
A1a ""He may have gained skill with explosives on his family's farms or in nearby mines and quarries..."" Speculation from Macmillan. Attribute it.
A1b Gage's date of birth in the infobox is not covered here when it should be covered and noted in proper context of its sourcing.
A2 Gage's accident
A2a Does not address numerous theories presented or Gage's actions prior to accident. EEng knows all too well this subject. I think Ratiu and Van Horn's material needs to be pointed out because the evidence shows that Gage had his mouth open and was speaking at the time the rod passed through his skull. I do not know why this is absent. I have issues with the section, but I'll hold off on the excessive quoting and measurement issues for now.
A3 Subsequent life and travels
A3a ""bt. February he was able to do a little work abt. ye horses & barn, feedg. ye cattle &c; that as ye time for ploughing came he was able to do half a days work after that & bore it well."" - Paraphrase.
A3b Would Gage's mental impairment belong here? I think it would be helpful.
A3c Missing Gage's time in New Hampshire prior to Chile.
A3d Chile and California is missing the account of Gage's doctor and missing some other tidbits, not too bad - but everything related to his mental improvement and the regaining of normalcy in his life is absent without reason.
A3e This is also the key section that Macmillan's research becomes quite useful as a case argument.
A4 Death and subsequent travels
A4a Still glaringly missing the details surrounding his return home, illness and death.
A4b Also, the exhumation details - which was in Fleischman's book - is entirely absent. This little episode in the Gage story is something which is important.
A5 Other matters
A5a Analysis and actual examination of the claims and details surrounding Gage and his role in science has been well- mostly avoided by the article. Instead of proper detailing of the injury and Gage's role in history.
A5b Only a few hundred words on Gage's mental impairments were written yet lengthy quotes are used.
A5c Using ""passim"" and other issues in citing Macmillan is also a cop-out and would merit a verifiability failure.
A5d Not even that, it doesn't even credit Macmillan when it should.
A6 Notes
A6a A substantial part of the text is hidden away in these notes. These complex, rambling, and citation filled messes that only make verification more tedious.
A6b A note like which reads "" See Macmillan & Lena;[34]:9 Harlow;[12]:332,345 Bigelow;[11]:16–17 Harlow;[9]:390 Macmillan.[1]:86"" is just improper.
A6c Note - ""Macmillan's book provides one of those rare occasions on which one can truly say that further research is not necessary ... the definitive account ...""[57]"" - is just the type of note we do not need.
A3c For Gage's time in New Hampshire, didn't he spent 18 months in a horse stable?
The article says
Gage subsequently worked for the owner of a livery and coach service in Hanover, New Hampshire
Harlow says this began sometime in 1851 and, ""He remained there, without any interruption from ill health, for nearly or quite a year and a half."" This fits with JMH's (JHM = John Martyn Harlow) information that PG went to Chile in August 1852. How about if we change it to
For about eighteen months he worked for the owner of a livery and coach service in Hanover, New Hampshire
Thoughts?
A4a missing details surrounding return home, illness and death
""but he was in Chile for about 7 years, correct? Then he returned and rested for awhile before becoming a farm laborer - I'm not sure if this is on one or several farms, but wasn't the convulsions following a day's labor on the farm? The seizures
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151fd9bbb631a176
|
Bush edit
EXCUSE ME MISTER I DID NOT MAKE AN UNCONSTRUCTIVE EDIT TO BUSH I ADDED THE TERM FOR A REAL RACE OF PEOPLE LIVING IN AFRICA LOOK UP BUSHMEN.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1520218bb64193e8
|
Deleting and modifying reference==
An editor Sam sailor has been continously deleting and modifying references of the article just like a child playing with a toy. Just see the amount of manupulations he has done and after deleting 12 references till now, he is still continuing he claims that i am doing edit war. He is the one vandalising the references and also voted for the articles removal, clearly showing his intentions regarding the article. I request the administors to take his vandalism seriously as he is using a loophole in the system by making small vandalising edits and also modifying such that if reverted the will accuse the reverting editor instead of the vandaliser like Sam sailor. Please do the needful, request to all editors.
==
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1520882fcfc419a6
|
"
""I want to be a fuck you.""
That's a song.
"
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1520a4720adda90b
|
September 2007 (UTC)
Please feel free to join in, if you have any actual points to make. You had better start using talkpages soon. 14:57, 13
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1520d66ccc937124
|
Care to actually provide examples? (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1520e0d3d91768b6
|
To allege - To assert without or before proof
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1521e8cd76ba235a
|
"
Fair use rationale for Image:SyphonFilter2Box.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SyphonFilter2Box.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1522a0d0cd60681c
|
Again, please stop editing Goguryeo article without approvals, also you're helping Chinese/Japanese trolls? Why?Korsentry
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1523bee2cbc6833c
|
Evidence based healthcare is not nonsense, still less patent nonsense.
I was distracted by something that couldn't wait*, which is why I hadn't worked out how to make the link from that page, which was searched for by someone on a discussion list called [email protected] work properly, or indeed add a discussion.
You have my leave to apologise.
healthcare, as it happens, and yes, based on evidence.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1523bf9047fa9dec
|
"
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
reason
Request handled by: 24.61.195.2
Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request."
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1524d79ac2a0f743
|
Guess who's coming to y'little BRATS
IT's GLEN MARTIN DDS!
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
152517f0da668634
|
Please act on the request below.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15257ad764d92a79
|
I try not to write about other, but I want to explain exactly what's going on. Sorry.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15268c88eaacf732
|
I have made changes to the bio as there is no way to confirm who actually said those comments in that chat room called excite.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15278eef3d038967
|
"
Requests for comment
I've echoed the suggestions of Mackensen and others that you take this to Wikipedia:Requests for comment. Your most recent reply on Mackensen's talk page is:
I could, but I think Arbcom should accept the case with or without an RfC. There's too much misconduct to willfully ignore. Besides, you're only asking me to do that to delay the inevitable, why would I ever take that advice?
There are several problems with this response:
Firstly a number of other editors have asked you to go through RfC: , the closer or the first Articles for deletion discussion, , who as far as I can tell played no part in earlier discussions, who also seems to have been absent from earlier discussions, and , an arbitrator who in rejecting the case said ""If you can't be bothered with an RfC then we can't be bothered with an arbitration case."" has also remarked on your failure to follow process here.
Again you allege misconduct, on a scale too great ""to wilfully ignore"". If there appears to be such a level of misconduct and yet the arbitrators can't see it, it looks like you'll have to make it more apparent to them.
But finally, despite all the others including arbitrators who have asked you to go to RfC, you say that I in particular am only asking you to go to RfC ""to delay the inevitable"". Well I'm not sure that you and I can agree on what ""the inevitable"" is in this case. To my eyes this looks a case on which you really wouldn't like to hear what the arbitrators have to say, and they've hinted on this in their comments on the case. But since they're obviously not going to accept the case until you've at least made an honest attempt to conduct some intermediate steps in dispute resolution, I'm urging you to do so. If an arbitration case follows, the sooner the better as far as I'm concerned, so get cracking. Tony Sidaway "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15279c38cf029dc3
|
", 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Check the editing history: most, if not all of the edits to the side of ""definite"", have come from homosexually aligned people and only given partial assent by some heterosexuals, whom are ""willing to give in"" to the speculative POV that you find as factual and want a fight to the death over. How come you people have no grasp of the royal court or politics? Why involve yourself then, except for tendentious editing? You only dig a deeper hole, by trying to make this article toe the line of homosexual propaganda, which has unbelievably assimilated homophobic oaths about the king and turned him into a homosexual, according to your own minds. These are observations, not allegations. The editing history is clear. Furthermore, because your collectively unscrupulous behaviors such as using logical fallacies and mob mentality of your Wikiproject, to force the issue, we have adolescents coming here to vandalize the article with ""fag jokes"". You turn a great study into infamy, all by exaggeration of scandal and not even the real issues at hand, which were so critical to the events which happened in 17th century England. 24.255.11.149 16:33"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1528bdf331ebf687
|
This is the worst article on Wikipedia.
The fact that Wikipedia cites leftist cranks who believe that hatred of a religion is somehow racism is just ridiculous.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15290bd5fb9e87df
|
, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry. I'm not sensitive about that sort of thing. Co., Inc. 19:58
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
152ac35989ba8362
|
1964: Space Edition on 06/04/2014
I love making this series, but I didn't get any barnstars because I didn't make it up the rank unless I get my Content Review Medal and my Gold WikiAward.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
152bb1a9d5047f4e
|
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Skateboard. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
152c448b8b406b81
|
SmithStreet article
Hi, changes have since been made to the following article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SmithStreetSolutions to amend its 'orphaned' status. Also, reference links have been added to ascertain notability. Would it be possible to have these tags removed?
Please let me know any other ways we can improve the article. Thanks
116.228.36.134
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
152f03467dfb063e
|
"
Dear Michael, thanks for your comment. I made the comment about the old version of the article almost exactly 3 years ago, see the version at that time: . It said ""Einstein–Cartan theory in theoretical physics extends general relativity, to handle spin angular momentum correctly."" at the very beginning and the whole article was written in the spirit of the claim that general relativity (without extensions) describes the spin incorrectly. As far as I can read, this is no longer claimed by the article. Einstein-Cartan theory is a historically important extension of general relativity, with some extra fields (torsion), but all the modern evidence indicates that such extra fields don't exist - and they're not needed. If you care about sociology, no research of cosmology or calculations of NASA's experiments or anything of the sort takes the ""torsion field"" into account because the latter doesn't exist, as far as the existing evidence - theoretical or experimental - can say. Today, it's not an important proposal to extend GR. The new article doesn't make these points too clear but at least it also no longer makes crazy claims throughout the text that general relativity (without torsion) is inconsistent with the spin, or something like that, so I wouldn't protest against the new version. Visually, it surely looks like a well-written article. However, I see some confusion in your comment that does show that the articles doesn't explain the basic points too clearly. Einstein-Cartan theory is not ""just"" about the tetrads. Tetrads are indeed useful - and in some formal sense necessary - to describe spin in General Relativity. However, using the tetrads formalism is not yet Einstein-Cartan theory. Einstein-Cartan theory assumes that ""torsion"" may be nonzero - even though it is identically zero in general relativity (which normally uses the metric). One can write GR in terms of tetrads as well - and the torsion is still zero. If that's so, one isn't doing Einstein-Cartan theory. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
153085f52e9a0a4a
|
In 1988 a Wide Use Campaign was introduced by republican senator, Mark Hatfield. The Wide Use Campaign supported unrestricted access to timber and other resources. Wise Use activists exploited the population’s fear of job and property security loss. The Campaign placed a barrier between workers and environmentalists. The Wide Use Campaign used bumper stickers, phone-ins and faxes to promote their views. Wise Use and Republicans kicked off anti-environmentalism.
The recession that began in 1990 enhanced anti-green and pro-industry views. A group called Alliance for America was created with 125 anti-environment and pro-industry groups. In 1994, the US did not pass a Biodiversity Treaty. Another group that was created in the 90’s was called Earth Day Alternatives. They were also counter-environmentalists. This group labelled environmentalists as “anti-human” and extremists. The Earth Day Alternative group promoted three things. They aimed to privatise resources for exploitation, advocate pollution to be permitted as trade between companies, to discredit environmental science. Heritage was a group that was also created with a laissez-faire approach toward the environment.
Anti-environmentalists were motivated by the fact that the ICI created deceptive green advertising.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15314008cac752b1
|
Please do not remove important info without good reason to doubt it.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1531436be6882f34
|
'Dogshit' reference
Is it really necessary? I don't think it adds anything to the article and just has the ability to offend, but as a newbie to editing Wikipedia, I'll leave it to this article's regulars. 65.107.212.130
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15322e3473bf05bf
|
Thanks Pete yes I had a though maybe I should re-word the 'proud' ... but I just left it there for the time being. Thanks for your helpful words,.... lots for me to learn.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
153234482514e362
|
Seems Paladin Press has picked up 40 titles from Loompanics to sell. Good to hear that some of the titles won't go by the wayside, a shame that they couldn't pick more up, but some is better than none.
Article referring to Paladin picking up 40 titles
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1534e164eee103a1
|
Hey, dumbfuck, quit fucking around with Wikipedia, bitch.
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
15363ee7dc345a87
|
Warning
Talking about vandalism will get you deleted
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1537b3bd97ae9ea2
|
P.S. Did you not like my style for your homepage?
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1538b6eb8f33b098
|
"
Fact checking
""from 1964 to 1985, Liverpool qualified for the European Cup on eight occasions by winning the former Football League First Division, and qualified for the UEFA Cup and Cup Winners Cup by winning the FA Cup and Football League Cup"".
The areas in bold above need to be double checked for accuracy."
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
153911a968bde400
|
Hooray!
A bad admin is desysopped! Hopefully this trend will continue until we can weed out all the malicious admins, then start promoting new users who will use the tools within policy.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
153990b9dd2f7ef4
|
"
Islamic terrorism
Hi again Sir Nicho. I thought most of the views at the Afd were for naming it Islamist terrorism instead of Islamic terrorism. Cheers '''' - Wiki me up ®
by all means. Godspeed! — Nearly Headless Nick {C} {L} "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1539ced2ebfaf95c
|
My Rfa
Hello, Alan. Thank you very much for your kind support in my recent Rfa, it succeeded! I hope to live up to your expectations. My congratulations on your not-so-recent Rfa, and your delightful new signature, too. See you! PeaceNT
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
153a0a7019875ecf
|
I agree, Fuller is a useless stupid fuck
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
153bd534262df5d2
|
Kingdom under Fire
Please don't make reverts to articles with misleading edit summaries as you did here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kingdom_Under_Fire_II&action;=historysubmit&diff;=479144243&oldid;=473726155
It's quite clear that your edit was a retrograde step as it removed proper formatting applied to a reference, and reintroduced unreferenced information that was previously removed because it could not be verified because the game had not been released.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
153cfbc689a07350
|
History 1890s
Some paragraphs in the History 1890s section contained inaccurate information, and I have replaced them with three new paragraphs.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
153f200521f2c521
|
"
Thks, I learn English in the same times ;-) (in English, we have the phrase ""walking wounded"") So, I understand that , as us, you have words to explain your point of view. This is a POV adjective and purple prose as it on the sentence. U need to be more accurate because the level of gravity is not the same for all of us. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15401c308981b31a
|
I think Lcnj should discuss the issue before changing the edits. It is considered as vandalism.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1540cdb5583b6a89
|
What, no weenus?
I want info on the weenus! Needs moar weenus. I mean.. it's the punchline of endless immature jokes. Surely it deserves a mention? 69.71.134.170
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154164e5390c9bda
|
, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
You don't need to survey an entire population to generalize. Stop assuming bad faith - it appears that Mccready is willing to leave your version of the article up and discuss it on this talk page. 15:14
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154184c7088f9fac
|
"
Carthage Abuse!
Wikipedia is a database, a Collection of ""Human"" Knowledge not a collection of Graco-Roman slander and biased.
I am the poster within that article who has been purifying the article from vandals and trolls, Carthage did not sacrifice children there is no proof no evidence nothing, only myths and story's there for the article should contain only FACTS about my people! Without us having to deal with every slime that gets in our way!
There are story's and myths that the Egyptians built there pyramids from the Atlanteans I dont see them having to deal with his garbage in that page.
Would you please warn those vandals who have a clear cut Graco-Roman anti-Carthaginian agenda to slander other people and other CIVILIZATIONS!
its time to end this facts is over opinion over fabrications over myth NOW lets see some action taking against the vandals
Marduk Of Babylon"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1542213434ff966f
|
So don't change the genre unless you know the specific type of genre. For exanple, Sleeping With Sirens are a post-hardcore band, Blink-182 are pop punk and so on and so on. Thank you for reading this, and I know you will follow this in the future.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15436b7716d074db
|
"
Mentioning Darwin gave up natural selection and became a Lamarckian
The article currently makes no mention of the historically important fact that Darwin himself converted from the natural selection theory of evolution to a Lamarckian environmentalist position in later editions of The Origin of Species, which went into 6 different editions by 1872. Hence I propose the following insert at the first Darwin quotation in the current section ‘Publication of the theory of natural selection’, which I also propose should be retitled ‘Publication of the Darwin’s theory of evolution’.
Proposed insert:
'However, even in the first edition of his book Darwin only claimed natural selection was the main means of selection, but not the only one. In the last sentence of its Introduction he said “Furthermore, I am convinced that natural selection has been the main but not exclusive means of modification.”
But by 1872 he had published six editions of the book with corrections and revisions, and in later editions in response to criticism of his theory of inheritance Darwin even gave up the theory of natural selection as the main selector of evolution, with its strong principle of inheritance, in favour of Lamarckian environmentalism, with a changing environment as the main selector. As C.D. Darlington wrote in 1950 in his Foreword to a new and first reprint of the otherwise unavailable first edition of The Origin:
""Let no one imagine, however, that, in the world of science, Darwin's theory has enjoyed an unchequered prosperity. On the contrary the dust of battle is only now beginning to settle on the hotly disputed ground....The most abiding source of trouble was that discovered by the Professor of Engineering at Edinburgh. Professor Fleming[sic] Jenkin pointed out in 1867, that any new variation appearing in one individual would be lost or swamped in later generations when that individual was compelled to cross with others of the old and established type, and its differences, as Darwin believed, blended in inheritance. Nature would never be able to keep any differences to select.
Darwin's defence against this objection was already prepared. He had hinted it in the first edition of The Origin of Species: at the end of the Introduction he had said that ""Natural Selection has been the main but not exclusive means of modification."" In later editions he hedged further. He fell back on the other means. These depended chiefly on the action of a changing environment: its direct effect in altering living things so as to suit it must be inherited. In adopting this view Darwin was giving up his own, and Wallace's, peculiar claim to originality: he was giving up the argument implied in the title of the book: and he was falling back on the discarded and disreputable theory of Lamarck.""
[p. xvii On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection first edition reprint in The Thinker's Library by Watts & Co, 1950.] '
But Darlington failed to establish Lamarck's theory was discarded or disreputable. In fact the theory of natural selection only became accepted in the mid-20th century with the ‘Mendelian-Darwinian synthesis’ in population genetics. But even by 1950 Darwinism was still not accepted in academia according to Darlington:
""In view of the triumph of his ideas it might be thought that Darwinism, in all civilised countries, would be taught as one of the foundations of thought, that in the universities everywhere it would be critically expounded and experimentally developed. That is true of its remote and general applications to such sciences as astronomy and geology. But where, as in its applications to ourselves, in the study of the genetics of men, and to the histories of nations, as exact knowledge of the principles of variation, hybridization and selection is required, we hear on every side nothing but confused and ignorant speculations. At the same time the foundation of Darwinism in the experimental study of evolution has largely been smothered in Darwin's own country. The Universities, with their museums and botanic gardens, are happy to forget what, in 1859, they were unable to resist. They contain no memorial of his work, and all the means of developing his doctrine they frustrate by an arrangement of teaching which the theory of evolution is not allowed to disturb. The old pedantic learning of botany and zoology, which Darwin treated as one subject, they continue to cleave asunder, burying the halves under their ancient schedules of instruction."" [‘’ibid’’ pxviii-xix]. '
I also propose the following edit of the article's introduction:
His 1859 book ‘’On the Origin of Species’’ posited natural selection was the main selector in the evolution and origin of species, but by its 1872 sixth edition Darwin had abandon
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15437eed3f388624
|
I've started the ball rolling at Template:LGBT topics. Thought I'd start off by coming up with headings and organising articles under them... -WJB talk-
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1544c25c710823d3
|
===
US senators urge arms 'to fight Russia'
=== Kazakhs Worried After Putin Questions History of Country's Independence
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154522829be99d0b
|
Motivation
What's this guy's motivation for doing this? Anything political/religious/corporate or is he just an attention seeker? t c
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1546c1fa65b8a3e7
|
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Microsoft Flight Simulator. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1547231d05952f99
|
"
This guy ""pacificWarrion"" is stupid, I'm working for the Filipino people, for their reputation on this world, every information I shared is to give accurate information's about the Philippines, the Filipino people, their culture and history."
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
154792baf09af63f
|
We were not discussing on which constants to list in the article, but on how the intro should read. .
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154804d41a9c0ff4
|
[edit] Oh Man...you deserve it!!!
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For being one of the most consistent and accurate vandal-fighters I have seen here...ever Jmlk17
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154813fee149bcab
|
"
Spventi: ""but perhaps it's safest to discuss your concerns before making arbitrary changes."" - Indeedly. Sorry for my thoughtlessness.I have no intention to suggest a change from ""nakashite"" to ""nakasete,"" but would feel better if ""miseyo"" is changed to ""miseu"" or ""miseyou"" because みせよ cannot be an expression of volition.The version in Spventi referred is modernized in wording, and both of the two sources say it was written by 松浦靜山, I would say みせう is the original. Plus, the explanation 「松浦靜山の『甲子夜話』にみえる川柳。おそらくはよみ人知らず」 sounds much more reliable than 「江戸後期の平戸藩主・松浦静山が詠んだ句」. Then, みせよう should be a more adequate modern Japanese word here than みよう. I suspect that it might be a typo or mistranslation. Now, here is a third source; a text book for junior-high ISBN 4-594-03155-2, in which the one for Hideyoshi is written as 鳴かぬなら鳴かしてみせようほととぎす. Spventi: ""then the onus is on you to provide information that suggests otherwise."" - Indeedly. But I can't find an english word to express hototogisu. That is why I questioned. It is a family of cuckoo, but smaller. And it really sings. A popular bird next to uguisu who tells you the spring has come, while hototogisu being the one for the summer. Here is an illustration. I was not suggesting to change the word, but just asking whether there was a better word to be used here. If not, it can stay as it is.Spventi: ""your concern about the word ""coax"" is entirely misplaced."" and Jim_Lockhart: ""I think coax is fine for saying that"" - Hmmm. I withdraw. I trust you two than my dictionaries. One comment to Jim_Lockhart. Yes, he used flattery when necessary, especially in his early times, and I don't think it gives a negative feeling by describing him that way. That was not my worry. What I wanted to say was that it is only one face of him. You wrote ""resourseful as he was"", agreed.Now that I accepted the word coax and the form without first person, I admit Spventi's saying ""the changes you made to the English versions of the senryu were clearly not improvements."" Sorry again. One last question: don't you feel like making some mutial reference between this section and Toyotomi_Hideyoshi#Cultural_point_of_interest? "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1548afd28f8e620a
|
HI BUDDY
Do you have alerts set up on my page to know when an edit is made or something.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1549bfeca2d39024
|
"
But, the resulting view seems to imply bias in your preceding considerations. For instance, you've assumed I wanted Roux gone, when there's never been any such expressed desire from me, either im- or explicitly, neither before nor now. It also seems that you've excused Roux for some of the behaviour you admonish me for (not to say I feel I should be excused from anything I've done).
If I may express my opinion, Roux is a good editor, but generally only when working alone or without opposition or critique; yes, I bare my own biases, but I come to that conclusion having seen his interactions with others in addition to my own experiences, and recent events seem to show that it isn't changing. It is my sense that in these circumstances he genuinely believes himself to be a victim, and, seemingly sensing some threat, responds to the most gentle criticism with the most vicious vitriol. While that can cause some problem in itself, the preverbal shit hits the fan when thrown into the mix are stubborn individuals who don't buy his claims of innocence and casualty, after which the intensity of the conflict increases exponentially. If it wasn't already obvious: I am one of those stubborn persons, believing we alone are responsible for our own actions. Thus, I honestly don't for one minute buy that Roux was ""driven"" to do anything; he chose to participate here in the manners that he did, both good and bad, and he chose to leave; just as I chose to participate in the manners that I did, chose to leave, chose to come back, chose to leave again, chose to come back, and choose to admit much of my editing habits were the wrong way to go about things. I like the idea of Roux no longer being an obstacle, but do not feel comfortable about the way in which it came to be; I'm not sure that anybody's actually won in this case. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1549e9e502453dfc
|
The edits I made were indeed sourced. See the talk page. It is Tim Wise himself who suggested that facts about himself be removed. This is a complete conflict of interest. Please stop with your personal attacks and threats. 174.54.34.187
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154a1383ed2e4b71
|
Relevant policy discussion at Village Pump
A very relevant conversation has started at the Village Pump over policies which possibly have direct implications on WSoP event pages. More specifically, there are discussions whether arbitrary event championship pages are notable or not (if not, they're open to deletion). Participants here can voice their questions/concerns about wiki policy there. Thanks.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154a1413ebae61b9
|
For Inclusion Tunny Wells is used throughout the town - I live here and I say it regularly, as do many other people I know 213.205.194.241
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154b2cebf51f7071
|
"
They are also over 5 days old and unlikely to be 5x more expandable, so DYK is kinda unlikely for them.'''''' • hasspoken "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154b3db740009386
|
"
Hello Timtrent,
I recently found that you declined the article submission for Draft:MOGAS Group with the reason ""This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources"". You also added that the links to the organisation's website should be minimised. I have been able to remove some information and references that had been obtained from the company's website. However, I am required to leave some references to the company website because I fear that the information would be deemed as G12. I was hoping that you could take a quick look at the article and advise me on any additional changes necessary for the article to be accepted. Thank you
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154b544dbd26f7ca
|
"
No, it's not my opinion
The source used actually says ""the announcement was very low-key"". Here's another source that says ""Why this matters: It doesn't, if you're on a traditional PC or Mac. I don't know how much the feature will get used on traditional PCs"". You want to add details on a minor change which violates WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTNEWS. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154c526ed26f1288
|
"
Hey I noticed in the Samuel article that ""Samuel"" is Latin. Where the Latinese deliveratly trying to honor and worship Samael by changing Shemuwel to Samuel? It would appear so because the Samael article reveals that Samael was a patron of the Roman empire. Interesting. 99.56.174.63 "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154cbda3666f4284
|
Fine, fine. I honestly don't give a rip. I'll let the baby have his bottle.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154cd9c142d872a2
|
"
Nice software
Hi, I've talked to this user, he seems enthusiastic. I will be away for seven to ten days so would not be able to follow up. BTW Check out this software to upload files directly to commons. http://tiredbrain.com/wikimedia/commonplace == 15:21, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154d01ae5db48a43
|
I've already provided you with diffs. You've simply lied about what they contain.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154d5eb19199e006
|
The United Kingdom is a unitary state governed under a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary system, with its seat of government in the capital city of London. There are three devolved national administrations, each with varying powers, situated in Belfast, Cardiff and Edinburgh; the capitals of Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland respectively......
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.