text
stringlengths
1
1.59M
meta
dict
I know. Bummer. Hey, I'm leaving for Houstong in about 30 minutes. Could you refresh my memory on what I owe you for the coastal and the acacia and I'll quickly send you a check right now! Thanks again for the lobster and fun last weekend. Sorry I didn't get back on Sunday. I cannot believe the Dolphins..... Nancy Sellers <[email protected]> 10/25/2000 11:31 AM To: "'Jeff Dasovich'" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: You forgot your wine.... Nancy (707) 251-4870 (phone) (707) 265-5446 (fax) "Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Rex: The individual to call is Nelson Murray at 713 286 - 2159, If you need any other info please let me know. Thanks for all of your help. Brad
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
sounds good. Meet at the Briar Club? -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Slocum <[email protected]>@ENRON Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 8:44 AM To: Rogers, Benjamin Subject: Tennis at 4:30? My toe is feeling better. How about tennis later this afternoon? The we can have beers and watch the USA beat the cry baby Russians.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Tim will be speaking from 12 - 1 today in Mt Hood. All other sessions will be 11 - 12 -----Original Message----- From: Dunton, Heather Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:27 PM To: DL-Portland World Trade Center Subject: Classes 11-12 Mt Hood Please join Enron Training Sessions 11-12 MT Hood. The goal is to provide an overview of each major function in our office to anyone who is interested in learning about what goes on here. Schedule: 1/4 Tim Belden - Floor Overview 1/7 Matt Motley - Term Trading 1/8 Sean, Diana, Richter - Cash Trading / California Market 1/9 Stewart, Paul, Foster - Middle Market / Services 1/10 Tim H - Fundies 1/11 Alan - Regulatory 1/14 Donald - Scheduling 1/15 Bill - Real Time 1/16 Scotty - Volume Management 1/17 John - Risk Management 1/18 Susan, Steve, Christian - Credit & Legal 1/22 Todd - Structuring
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
There will be a meeting on Wednesday, August 2, 2000 from 9:00 am until 10:00 am in Conference Room EB3321. We will be discussing the Triple Lutz and Trantula Projects. I will look forward to seeing you there. Thanks Please mark your calendars for the following meeting: DATE: AUGUST 2, 2000 TIME: 9:00am - 10:00 am PLACE: EB3321 DISCUSSION TOPICS: PROJECT TRIPLE LUTZ PROJECT TRANTULA I will look forward to seeing you there. Thanks.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
you ain't kidding. Evelyn Kahl Elsesser <[email protected]> 02/12/2001 12:26 PM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Re: Revised CESG Outline it's scary in cyberspace.... [email protected] wrote: > This appears to be a note that was sent a very long time ago and just > showed up in your in-box. I'm thinking it was the decision to raise rates > that happened beginning of January. > > Best, > Jeff
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Kevin, Obviously I am not searching for any additional write-offs. It is clear to me that you have not come to terms with the problems we have already identified. We are only trying to make sure that we have accurately quantified those problems already identified. As I am sure you know, we estimate that there is no remaining value in the portfolio and more than likely material write-offs. Therefore, to make earnings we are going to have create positive incremental value. Trading will produce no positive incremental value in this quarter. On a go forward basis we have losses we must recognize to clean up the portfolio and move on. The Lightrade deal involved selling pooling points that could be considered somewhat central to our success as a bandwidth trading organization - we were willing to do this to help EBS make short term earnings. If we did not burn up in excess of $500 million this year, accomplishing virtually nothing, then we would not be in this position. You have never considered prudent write-offs, why start now. Regards, Jim Kevin Hannon 11/20/00 06:16 PM To: Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: Subject: Earnings Jim, The latest budget numbers still show us approx $100mm behind plan with not much more than one full month to go in the year. If the Lightrade deal is truly off ,which I believe it is, this only makes our job harder. "Bad News Barry" is apparently trying to drop that title because he confessed to me today that you were looking for further write-offs. This obviously is going in the opposite direction from where we need to be. I am happy to consider any prudent write-offs to the extent we can offset them with earnings sufficient to allow us to still reach our target. However, seeking out potential write-offs this quarter when we are clearly struggling is puzzling and seems to send all the wrong signals to the organization. Please let me know if I am missing something here. Kevin
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 10/8/01; HourAhead hour: 21; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001100821.txt Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Performance Evaluation Process (PEP) <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Performance+20Evaluation+20Process+20+28PEP+29+20+3Cperfmgmt+40enron+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 8:05 AM To: Williams III, Bill Subject: PEP System Message Due to one or more individuals declining to be a reviewer WHITEHEAD, COLLIN has less than five reviewers listed in the PEP system. The recommended minimum number of reviewers for each employee is five. Please login to the PEP system at http://pep.enron.com to select additional reviewers for this employee.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 11/10/2000 08:18 AM --------------------------- Steven McCabe <[email protected]> on 11/10/2000 08:06:44 AM To: Todd Wheeler <[email protected]>, Drew Wilkinson <[email protected]>, Bob Wood <[email protected]>, Shanna Husser <[email protected]>, Shannon Johnson <[email protected]>, Leslie H King <[email protected]>, David Lennon <[email protected]>, Alex Massa <[email protected]>, Mom <[email protected]>, Johnny Moore <[email protected]>, Matt Morley <[email protected]>, Malcolm Rios <[email protected]>, Matt Rodgers <[email protected]>, Jarrod Ruez <[email protected]>, Suzanne Sevier <[email protected]>, Julie Shaulis <[email protected]>, Tim Belcher <[email protected]>, Julie Beloate <[email protected]>, James Bendele <[email protected]>, Jay Bowman <[email protected]>, Rob Shelley Brown <[email protected]>, Julia Carruth <[email protected]>, Ashley Craddock <[email protected]>, Richard Curran <[email protected]>, Dad <[email protected]>, David B Ellis <[email protected]>, Ashley Font <[email protected]>, David Frey <[email protected]>, Jill Gilmore <[email protected]>, Gregory Gleaves <[email protected]>, Jane Gleaves <[email protected]>, Joe Gleaves <[email protected]>, Kevin Hix <[email protected]>, Andy Hogue <[email protected]> cc: David Kulmann <[email protected]> Subject: If you have 5 minutes If you have 5 minutes today and need a laugh, I offer the following number. Democrats set up a toll-free number (1-800-579-8871) where Florida voters could report irregularities. Feel free to call and tell them that if the Democratic Voters are too stupid to figure out the ballot and how to vote for President, then they shouldn't be allowed to vote. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
[IMAGE] Frost & Sullivan is a customer-focused marketing consulting and training company. Dear Vince, Frost & Sullivan is your partner for 2002 business planning. Rely on our analyst services to reinforce planning, speed decision-making, discern project feasibility and better allocate limited resources. Whether you need a few quick datapoints or a large primary consulting project we are prepared to serve your needs. Please reply to this email and check all that apply: Please contact me for a free assessment. Email more information to me. Please send information on case histories. My industry is: <fill in the blank> Send information about my own, personal web portal. Upgrade my recent purchase -send details. Please describe your challenge in detail (as your partner all information is strictly confidential): Our analyst experts across all industries and continents give you the intelligence, recommendations, and strategies to champion your business' success. [IMAGE] To contact Frost & Sullivan: Reply to this email Email: [email protected] Call toll free: 877.Go.Frost (463.7678) Fax toll free: 888.690.3329 Visit: Frost & Sullivan homepage Your contact information: Name: Vince Kaminsky Title: Vice President of Research Company: Enron Corporation Address: 1400 Smith Street City, State/Province Postal code: Houston, TX 77251-1188 Country: USA Phone: 7138533848 Fax: 7136462599 email address: [email protected] To update your information please respond to this email with any changes. This message is being sent to you by Frost & Sullivan If you would prefer not to receive further messages from this sender, please click on the following e-mail link and send a message with or without any text:Click here for e-mail You will receive one additional e-mail message confirming your removal.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000 03:57 PM --------------------------- From: Joannie Williamson 10/27/2000 04:05 PM To: Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Investor Relations Org Chart Per your request.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Carol St. Clair EB 3892 713-853-3989 (Phone) 713-646-3393 (Fax) [email protected] ----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 11/16/00 11:04 AM ----- Executive Compensation@ENRON Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON 11/14/00 07:17 PM To: Eligible Employees cc: Subject: Deferral Enrollment 2001 Good news! Deferral program enrollment begins Wednesday, November 15, 2000. Enron's Bonus Stock Option and Bonus Phantom Stock Programs provide you with an opportunity to receive stock options and phantom stock in lieu of all or a portion of the cash bonus you may receive during 2001. To make enrollment even more convenient for you, this year's deferral program information is available on eHRonline. To learn more about your deferral program opportunities and to enroll for 2001 deferrals, access eHRonline at http://ehronline.enron.com. (Call the ISC Help Desk at 713-345-4727 if you need your ID or password to access the system.) 1. Review the program descriptions (attached to the Election Form) before you make your elections. 2. If you decide to defer compensation, complete the Election Form before Friday, December 8, 2000 (the enrollment deadline). 3. Print your 2001 Election Form and Confirmation Statement right from the web site and you,re finished! Sound easy? It is! DEFERRAL ENROLLMENT 2001--ADDED VALUE FOR YOUR FUTURE
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
You're not going to believe this. I talked to Amoco and they confirmed that I did the deal with them but they said thawe should just pay Agave Energy because tit's a complicated internal deal. So we are both right.. I only wished Amoco would have told me ahead of time. Bottom line- pay Agave Energy and not Amoco
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
------------------------------------------------------------------------ NEWS RELEASE FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ For immediate release: DECEMBER 18, 2001 Media Contact: CHRIS DAVIS - 916-654-4989 Energy Commission Staff Completes Assessment of Henrietta Power Project Sacramento -- The California Energy Commission staff has released its Staff Assessment outlining the conditions that should apply to the design, construction, operation and closure of the proposed Henrietta Peaker Power Plant if the Commission approves the project. The Staff Assessment can be viewed on the Energy Commission's website at: www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/henrietta/documents/ The document includes the Energy Commission staff's comprehensive analyses of the 91.4-megawatt, simple-cycle power plant proposed by GWF Energy, LLC. The facility is planned for a seven-acre site near Lemoore in unincorporated Kings County. The project would consist of the power plant, a 70-kilovolt switchyard, and approximately 550 feet of new transmission line. Natural gas for the project will be delivered through approximately 2.2 miles of new pipeline. The Staff Assessment is a staff document, not a Commission decision. This assessment was prepared by Commission staff in accordance with the Public Resources Code and the California Environmental Quality Act. The Commission will hold a Prehearing Conference on Friday, January 4, 2002, at the Energy Commission in Sacramento. If the Committee determines that all potential issues are uncontested, the Committee will convene an Evidentiary Hearing immediately following the Prehearing Conference. If any matter is contested, the Committee will hold an Evidentiary Hearing on January 17, 2002. The purpose of these open and publicly noticed meetings is to allow members of the public to participate in the power plant certification process. To find out how to get involved, contact the Energy Commission's Public Adviser, Roberta Mendonca, at (916) 654-4489, toll free at (800) 822-6228, or by e-mail at [[email protected]]. # # # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Do your part to help during California's Electricity Crisis. Set your computer and monitor to go to sleep or energy saver mode during the business day. And turn your computer and monitor off at the power strip or surge protector when you leave at the end of the day or over the weekend. To learn more about what you can do go to: http://www.flexyourpower.ca.gov Bob Aldrich Web Development Team California Energy Commission 916-654-4989 To unsubscribe from this list, please go to: http://www.energy.ca.gov/listservers/ Or simply send an e-mail to [email protected] and in the body of the e-mail, type in unsubscribe (name of this list) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Larry, Do you know if Enron is hiring for IS people?? My brother in law just graduated with a degree in MIS and is looking for a job after the summer.? He is finishing up with his classes this summer. ? He was saying he wanted to work with ERP...whatever that means.? And People Soft, whatever that is too. ? Can you help me out please.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi, Here is where I'll be: Oct 3 - SW flight #76 to San Jose Mill Rose Inn, Half Moon Bay, 650-726-8750 Oct 4 - Petersen, Los Gatos, 408-354-1691 6 Oct 7 - Santa Cruz Hotel, Santa Cruz, 831-426-4330 8 Oct 9 - Quality Inn, Cannery Row, 831-649-8580 Oct 10 - Coachman's Inn, Carmel, 831-624-6421 11 Oct 12 - Big Sur Lodge, Big Sur, 831-667-3100 13 Oct 14 - Sea Otter Inn, Cambria, 805-927-5888 15 Oct 16 - Petersen's 17 Oct 18 - SW Flight #1211 See you when I get back! love, mum
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
No action is required by Legal on above list.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Norton SystemWorks 2002 Professional Edition Get it Today for 90% Off the Combined Retail Value! [IMAGE] The complete problem-solving suite for home users and small businesses. It protects your PC against virus threats, optimizes performance, cleans out Internet clutter, provides quick and easy system recovery, clones and upgrades computers, and sends and receives faxes. [IMAGE] This featured-packed suite of products includes: * Norton AntiVirus? protects your PC from virus threats * Norton Utilities? optimizes PC performance & solves problems * Norton CleanSweep? cleans out Internet clutter * Norton Ghost? clones and upgrades your system easily * GoBack by Roxio? provides quick and easy system recovery * WinFax Basic? sends and receives professional-looking faxes [IMAGE] A $300+ Combined Retail Value for Only... [IMAGE] FREE SHIPPING! * [IMAGE] Click here for [IMAGE] on this exciting offer! [IMAGE] This offer is limited to stock on hand, so hurry before they're gone! [IMAGE] * Free shipping applies to Standard Shipping only. Priority Shipping available for an additional fee. Our products are usually shipped in an attractive, sturdy plastic storage case instead of retail boxes or jewel cases. Product pictures shown are for display purposes only. [IMAGE]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I'm glad Mark came to the same conclusion regarding valuation - Mitch seemed to indicate a much higher number. I hope Mark understands that the "hole" in '04 is highly unlikely given the demand and competitve positions. -----Original Message----- From: Hayslett, Rod Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:28 PM To: Howard, Kevin A. Subject: FW: nwn FYI -----Original Message----- From: Wadlington, Mark Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:11 PM To: Taylor, Mitch; Terp, Brian; Wadlington, Mark; Donahue, Jeff Cc: Hayslett, Rod; Desai, Jayshree Subject: nwn still waiting for the formal pubcomps and acqcomps from JPMorgan and SSB. I spent years in NY doing the math though and spoke to Rod for his help (he had great color). The answer is 8-10x ebitda. as an extra check, we put in another multiple for the duke/westcoast deal (approx. 1.7x rate base). Same answer both times. EV 2.0-2.3 (with a sales hat maybe 2.5), equity value 1.6-1.8. I wouldnt push the sales hat too far though, the duration of contracts on this pipeline do not favorably compare to those on most pipelines in general -- in other words, you could be staring at a "hole" in '04. (Once I get the precise numbers from the bankers, I'll plug them in -- the answer shouldnt change more than 5%). What's the next step for me? Want me to forward to muller/jeff golden? Regards Mark << File: nwn.xls >>
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dear Sara, I have been advised that a response regarding the Cargill, Inc. guarantee of Cargill-Alliant, LLC was returned with comments to Ed Sachs early last week. Are you aware if the language was found acceptable? Also, regarding the modification we requested to the Set-Off language of the most recent draft, can you please advise if we've come to agreement on these? (What was the reason behind adding the second paragraph of the Set-Off provisions?) Regards, Mara Alexander Sr. Documentation Analyst Cargill, Incorporated Tel: 952.984.3417 Fax: 952.984.3872 e-mail: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Alexander, Mara /xtwn Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 7:38 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ISDA Master Agreement Sara, My Credit Manager advises that he needs to consult with one of our Corporate Treasury's attorneys on the Cargill, Inc. guarantee, but that attorney will be out all this week. Hopefully I can get a response to you on the guarantee early next week. Meanwhile, attached please find one small change to Set-Off language from the latest draft. Can you please explain the reason behind adding the second paragraph -- is this bankruptcy related? Regards, Mara Alexander Sr. Documentation Analyst Cargill, Incorporated Tel: 952.984.3417 Fax: 952.984.3872 e-mail: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Alexander, Mara /xtwn Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:09 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ISDA Master Agreement Sara, I'm sorry, but I'm still awaiting word on the Cargill, Inc. guarantee of Cargill-Alliant, which was in the hands of our Credit Manager for a final once-over. (Unless they've by-passed me? Have you seen a revised copy of this guarantee?) I also need that same Credit Mgr. to give his final nod of approval to the Set-Off language you'd put into the last draft. Our Legal only had on a couple of minor comments on it. Thanks for the follow-up! I intend to press hard this week for a final response so we can at last get this wrapped up. Mara Alexander Sr. Documentation Analyst Cargill, Incorporated Tel: 952.984.3417 Fax: 952.984.3872 e-mail: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:45 PM To: alexander, mara /xtwn Subject: ISDA Master Agreement Mara: Are we done? I don't think we have heard from you about the master? Can we go ahead and have the guaranty executed? I don't think we have any outstanding issues. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
From Kevin Hannon, Jim Hughes and John Lavorato Our efforts to move our South American merchant business model to look like our North American and European models has been evolving quickly. In the volatile Brazilian power market, Enron is poised to start-up the first merchant plant in the near future. We are working on several structured transactions and are at the forefront in working with Brazilian regulators to create a viable deregulated power market. To continue our positive momentum in South America, we have decided to change the leadership of the merchant business. We have asked Orlando Gonzalez to become President and CEO. In addition we have asked Brett Wiggs to join Orlando in the office of the chairman as Chief Commercial Officer. Joe Kishkill has been involved in the South American business for many years and will be exploring other opportunities within Enron. We would like to thank Joe for his contributions. Please join us in congratulating Orlando and Brett on their new duties.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
As you know, the ETA has to address Trade one-to-many with Enron and Match one-to-many with Enron. We also need a separate Trade GTC one-to-many with Enron and Separate Match GTC one-to-many with Enron. We also need a single Password application that addresses Match and Trade, both one-to-many. As soon as these drafts are complete, I would like to read them! Thanks. GP ---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Piper/Corp/Enron on 07/12/2000 11:33 AM --------------------------- From: Travis McCullough@ECT on 07/11/2000 08:33 PM To: Greg Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brandon Wax/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Cummings/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Electronic Transactions Agreement - revised Attached is a revised version of the ETA omitting the distinction between transactions on Match and transactions on Trade. If Enron is the only party permitted to post product on Match, there is no need for the special rules that we drafted for what was previously a "many-to-many" matching site. However, we will need to develop a different set of GTCs for transactions that Enron closes on Match, since the products transacted on Match are not likely to be the type that lend themselves to Enron's standard GTCs. Travis McCullough Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street EB 3817 Houston Texas 77002 Phone: (713) 853-1575 Fax: (713) 646-3490
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Please put me down for one large crock pot of "Phossum's Phamous Pheasant Chili." Its actually not that famous, but its pretty darn good if I may say so myself! DF From: Judy Kudym 02/23/2001 11:36 AM To: NPNG Omaha Office, ET&S Omaha Office cc: Subject: ETS Chili Society ATTENTION: ADDITIONAL COOKS NEEDED We don,t have enough people bringing chili for the March 1 Chili Festival. Please consider becoming a Chilihead -- cook a pot of chili (your recipe of choice), and have a good time in helping raise funds for worthwhile charities or non-profit organizations. Become a member of the ETS CHILI SOCIETY 2001 I will participate and bring my favorite chili to share with everyone in the Omaha Office.* Name: _____________________________________ Name your dish: _______________________________ Degree of spice: _______________________________ (i.e., mild, medium, hot, other) *Those who cook chili and bring it in on March 1 will receive a special souvenir gift. Please return this sign-up sheet ASAP to Judy Kudym. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ [copied from the International Chili Society Web Site] "Zanjero Red Chili" 1999 World Championship Recipe, from Maud Swick Ingredients: 3 lbs Course Ground or Cubed Beef Roast, 1 cup Onion, 5 Pods Garlic, 2 Ortega Chili Peppers, 1 can Chicken Broth, 1 can Beef Broth, 1 can Tomato Sauce, 10 Tbsp Chili Powder, 1 Tbsp Cumin, 1 Tbsp Hot New Mexico Chili Powder Directions: Sautee meat & onions in 1 tsp Wesson oil Add to the broth Simmer 1 hour Add: 1 can tomato sauce Chili peppers chili powders and cumin Simmer 1 hour and Salt to taste
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Did you mean to send that e:mail to me? It was Greek to me, and I assume that the Sally it was meant for was that Sally Conover. Feels like a Monday, doesn't it? --Sally
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Notice # 01-157 May 14, 2001 TO: ALL NYMEX/COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS ALL NYMEX/COMEX DIVISION MEMBER FIRMS ALL NYMEX/COMEX DIVISION CLEARING FIRMS ALL NYMEX/COMEX DIVISION OPERATION MANAGERS FROM: Stu Smith, Senior Vice President, Operations RE: Exchange Early Contract Closing Schedule for May 25, 2001 Please be advised that the Exchange will close markets earlier on Friday, May 25, 2001, the business day preceding Memorial Day. The following early contract closing schedule will be implemented: NYMEX DIVISION Commodity Closing Range Palladium Futures 11:58 a.m. - 12:00 noon Platinum Futures and Options 12:08 p.m. - 12:10 p.m. Heating Oil Futures and Options *12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Unleaded Gasoline Futures and Options *12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Crack Gas & Crack Heat Options 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Propane Futures 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Crude Oil Futures and Options 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures &Options *12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Permian Pool Natural Gas Futures 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Alberta Natural Gas Futures 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Gulf Coast Gasoline Futures 12:58 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. COMEX DIVISION Aluminum Futures and Options 11:59 a.m. - 12:00 noon Copper Futures and Options **12:04 p.m. - 12:05 p.m. Silver Futures and Options 12:04 p.m. - 12:05 p.m. Gold Futures and Options 12:09 p.m. - 12:10 p.m. The Eurotop 100 & 300 contracts will conduct normal trading hours. The NYMEX Late Submissions Area is scheduled to close at 2:30 p.m. and the NYMEX Trade Correction Area will close at 3:15 p.m., the TMS trade allocation screens will be available until 4:30 p.m. The COMEX Division's OLTE System will be available for corrections until 2:30 p.m. In the event that you require additional time to process work, or have questions regarding early close procedures, please call Fred Tantao 299-2045, Rob Stasi 299-2067, George Henderson 299-2071, Les Faison 299-2070 (NYMEX Division) or Michael Campanelli 299-2072, David Sherman 299-2061 (COMEX Division). * Option Expiration Procedure will be conducted at approximately 3:15 p.m. for the ON, OH & GO June 2001 contract months. ** Option Expiration Procedure will be conducted for the HX June 2001 contract month. *** All Electricity Future and Option contracts on NYMEX Access will close at 1:00 p.m. Carr Futures 150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500 Chicago, IL 60606 USA Tel: 312-368-6149 Fax: 312-368-2281 [email protected] http://www.carrfut.com
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
> - > > > > > > > A farmer got pulled over by a state trooper for speeding,? and the trooper started to lecture the farmer about his speed, and in general began to throw his weight around to try to make the farmer uncomfortable. Finally, the trooper got around to writing out the ticket, and as he was doing that he kept swatting at some flies that were buzzing around his head.? The farmer said, "Having some problems with circle flies there, are ya?" The trooper stopped writing the ticket and said- "Well yeah, if that's what they are-I never heard of circle? flies." So the farmer says-"Well, circle flies are common on farms. See,? they're called circle flies because they're almost always found circling around the back end of a horse." The trooper says, "Oh," and goes back to writing the ticket. Then after a minute he stops and says, "Hey...wait a minute, are you trying to call me a horses ass?" The farmer says, "Oh no, officer. I have too much respect for law enforcement and police officers to even think about calling you a horses ass." The trooper says, "Well, that's a good thing," and goes? back to writing the ticket. After a long pause, the farmer says, "Hard to fool them flies though." > > > > > > >
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
- 1-14-2002.xls
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dear Jeff, Thank you for asking me to attend, on your behalf, an invitation by the Baker Institute Energy Forum, for a presentation and dinner with Ra?l Mu?oz, the new CEO of PEMEX. As you probably know, he has been my friend for many years and he invited me to fly out today in a PEMEX plane to Houston. On a different issue, I was told by Juan Eleck, a good friend of mine, and a member of the Trustees of SMU, of your recent appointment as Board Member. Congratulations!! Best regards, Jaime _____
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I just spoke to Stacey Richardson, and, with Georgi Landau gone, she said we should contact her, or Bridgette Anderson, with any Global Contracts questions for the time being.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
It looks to me from reviewing the bid documents we received on the January I to I deals like we communicated to the counterparties identical information that the capacity would be available in several "packages" and other details of the sale procedure. That communication must have been either (1) a posting of some type, (2) a fax or other document we sent them explaining what space was available and how to bid, or (3) a script that the marketers were all following to communicate to the customers. Toby, if it was a posting, it would have gone up in late December or the first few days of January. Please verify whether we did any open season posting advertising that space (which included Dec. 01 space and calendar '02 and '03 space). If it was a fax or other document or a script, we need to get our hands on it. Kevin, Lorraine, TK, Susan--does anyone remember which it was or know how to get our hands on it? If we are going to be in a dogfight with BP on these deals, lets make sure we go in armed with as much of the relevant information as possible to demonstrate we were following the rules. DF
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ W E E K E N D S Y S T E M S A V A I L A B I L I T Y F O R November 10, 2000 5:00pm through November 13, 2000 12:00am ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages. AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages. EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages. EDI SERVER: POSTPONED Impact: EDI Time: Sat 11/11/2000 at 11:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/12/2000 at 1:00:00 AM CT Sat 11/11/2000 at 9:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at 11:00:00 PM PT Sun 11/12/2000 at 5:00:00AM London thru Sun 11/12/2000 at 7:00:00 AM London Outage: EDI HUB DISK VOLUME INCREASE Environments Impacted: Corporate Purpose: Continued EDI volume increases require the addition of more disk space for EDI operations. Backout: Utilize current configuration w/o new HACMP configuration Contact(s): Jack Metkus Jim Nelson 3-7799 713-327-2007 Karen O'Grady 5-7149 713-327-4805 Jack Metkus 3-0362 713-288-0743 EI: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS: No Scheduled Outages. FIELD SERVICES: No Scheduled Outages. INTERNET: ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT Impact: eol Time: Fri 11/10/2000 at 6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 11/10/2000 at 7:00:00 PM CT Fri 11/10/2000 at 4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 11/10/2000 at 5:00:00 PM PT Sat 11/11/2000 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 11/11/2000 at 1:00:00 AM London Outage: eol net change Environments Impacted: EOl Purpose: We have found that IP multicast storms on the EOL internal subnet 172.16.21.0 briefly incapacitate the EOL firewall eolfw1. To solve the problem, we will insert a new VLAN/subnet 172.16.23.0 between 172.16.21.0 and the firewall so that no IP multicast traffic will reach the firewall interface. Physical work includes running two copper cables from trd-cx[12]-3405 port 6/7 to eolfw1 and logical work entails defining the new VLAN on the switches/routers, enabling interface vlan23 and changing ip route 192.216.56.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.21.4 ip route 192.216.57.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.21.4 to ip route 192.216.56.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.23.4 ip route 192.216.57.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.23.4 on the routers, and replacing route inside 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 172.16.21.1 1 route inside 172.16.0.0 255.242.0.0 172.16.21.1 1 route inside 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.16.21.1 1 with route inside 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 172.16.23.1 1 route inside 172.16.0.0 255.242.0.0 172.16.23.1 1 route inside 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.16.23.1 1 on eolfw1. Backout: Contact(s): Anchi Zhang 713-853-5464 LOTUS NOTES: No Scheduled Outages. MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages. NT: No Scheduled Outages. OS/2: No Scheduled Outages. OTHER SYSTEMS: ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT Impact: CORP Time: Sat 11/11/2000 at 8:30:00 AM Buenos Aires thru Sat 11/11/2000 at 5:00:00 PM Buenos Aires Sat 11/11/2000 at 5:30:00 AM CT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at 2:00:00 PM CT Sat 11/11/2000 at 3:30:00 AM PT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at 12:00:00 PM PT Sat 11/11/2000 at 11:30:00 AM London thru Sat 11/11/2000 at 8:00:00 PM London Outage: Maintenance electricity Environments Impacted: ESA - Buenos Aires Purpose: Electrical security Backout: Back to the original project. Contact(s): Ariel Bruch Nilson Busto 55-11-5503-1347 office 55-11-9233-7481 cel Impact: ESA Time: Sun 11/12/2000 at 2:30:00 PM Brazil thru Sun 11/12/2000 at 6:00:00 PM Brazil Sun 11/12/2000 at 10:30:00 AM CT thru Sun 11/12/2000 at 2:00:00 PM CT Sun 11/12/2000 at 8:30:00 AM PT thru Sun 11/12/2000 at 12:00:00 PM PT Sun 11/12/2000 at 4:30:00 PM London thru Sun 11/12/2000 at 8:00:00 PM London Outage: Maintenance to the electrical systems Environments Impacted: Sao Paulo Office Purpose: Security maintenance Backout: Back to the original project. Contact(s): Nilson Busto 55-11-5503-1347 office 55-11-9233-7481 cel SITARA: No Scheduled Outages. SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages. TELEPHONY: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT TERMINAL SERVER: No Scheduled Outages. UNIFY: Impact: CORP Time: Fri 11/10/2000 at 6:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at 8:15:00 AM CT Fri 11/10/2000 at 4:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at 6:15:00 AM PT Sat 11/11/2000 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 11/11/2000 at 2:15:00 PM London Outage: Unify Environments Impacted: Unify Users Purpose: For better I/O performance Backout: Restore the database with the backup Contact(s): Jaikishore Bharathi 713-853-0347 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- FOR ASSISTANCE (713) 853-1411 Enron Resolution Center (713) 853-5536 Information Risk Management Specific Applications Help: Unify On-Call (713) 284-3757 [Pager] Sitara On-Call (713) 288-0101 [Pager] RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS (713) 639-9726 [Pager] OSS/UA4/TARP (713) 285-3165 [Pager] CPR (713) 284-4175 [Pager] EDI Support (713) 327-3893 [Pager] All Other Systems (713) 563-5797 [Pager] or (713) 563-5987 [Pager]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
See below for when we receive a worksheet from Credit for Delphi Automotive. -----Original Message----- From: Noel, Thierry Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:40 PM To: Panus, Stephanie Cc: Curry, Ken Subject: Delphi Automotive DPH) Stephanie, I need to get an ISDA set-up with Delphi Automotive (NYSE DPH). Ken Curry is looking into credit limits. As soon as you have it ready, thanks for forwarding to me the two copies (I am now located in Enron South at 04848). I want to forward it with other documents to the client. Many Thanks ext 55885
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Eric, Please see my comments in bold blue. Thanks, Ellen x54099 -----Original Message----- From: Boyt, Eric Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 9:50 AM To: Grass, John; Kelly, Katherine L.; Thorne, Judy; Zivley, Jill T.; Bryan, Gary; Roberts, Linda; Ferries, Nelson; Quick, Joan; Spence, Tricia; Cook, Diane H.; Martinez, Jennifer; Palmer, B. Scott; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Rohauer, Tanya; Saladino, Jane S.; Wallumrod, Ellen Cc: Garcia, Santiago Subject: Draft Process Check List To All: In our last general Wellhead Book meeting, we discussed general processes to be followed for larger gas deals going into the wellhead book. Attached is the revised process check list for both VPP/Prepay transaction and long-term physical purchase transactions. I have also attached a document outlining the procedures to get a new entity set up in Global Counterparty. Please review and provide feedback/comments by Thursday, July 12, close of business. Thanks in advance! Eric 713-345-7754 << File: Process Check List (7.10.01).doc >> << File: Procedures to request access for GCP Request System.doc >>
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Lynn, I am forwarding you the resume of a very bright and motivated young man who attended a lecture I gave recently at LSU. I think we should consider him for an analyst position. Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2000 08:52 AM --------------------------- "Richard C. Iles" <[email protected]> on 09/14/2000 11:14:56 AM Please respond to "Richard C. Iles" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Enron Opportunities Dr. Kaminski: ? Here is my resume and cover letter. ? Thanks, ? Richard Iles - Enron Cover and Resume.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
i'm sure everyone sitting around you does too! -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:50 AM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: im back, i feel much better -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:43 AM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: the one on the second floor in the other building. -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:42 AM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: i agree lets go, what store sells toothpaste? -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:40 AM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: why? what happened? i am feeling sick. i honestly cannot hear this Enron crap all day long! -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:39 AM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: the crown plaza next door -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:38 AM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: where did you stay? -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:37 AM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: only for the night -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:37 AM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: please tell me that you did not move out. and why didn't you buy some this morning? -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:35 AM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: i forgot to pack my toothpaste, long story -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:34 AM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: what? no. are you being serious. you can get some in the store in the other building. did you forget to brush your teeth this morning? -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:33 AM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: no i havent heard anything, do you have any toothpaste -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:31 AM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: it was good. i guess. i didn't want to come back. and what am i late for? it's not like i have a whole lot to do. have you heard anything about today or tomorrow? i love coming to work.....more and more rumors to greet you. -----Original Message----- From: Maggi, Mike Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:30 AM To: Nelson, Michelle Subject: RE: dont hush me, how was youre trip back -----Original Message----- From: Nelson, Michelle Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:29 AM To: Maggi, Mike Subject: RE: Hush -------------------------- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
we have 4 do you want them? Errol McLaughlin@ENRON 01/31/2001 08:56 AM To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Sherry thanks
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Daren ---FYI-- I changed CES back to the first, adjustment of (372). Mark
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Peachy keen jelly bean! Kate Symes @ ECT 12/20/2000 10:17 AM To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Hinson Power Company, Inc. I've forwarded this e-mail to Christian and Greg. Unfortunately, the population of the office is quickly dwindling as the holidays come near. I've been told that one or the other of them will be in today, and I'll find out if something has been sent out already, and if not, how soon we can do that. I'll get back to you as soon as I talk to them. Thanks, Kate Kimberly Hundl@ENRON 12/20/2000 07:30 AM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Hinson Power Company, Inc. Hi Kate, Deals #478168, 478944, 478945, 478946 are to be confirmed by either Greg Wolfe or Christian Yoder. We need to get the final copy of these confirm letters so we can scan them into the system for our files. Also, if the finalized confirm has been sent to the counterparty we need to change the status in the system. These deals are still showing up on our "New" report every morning and I need to do something with them. Thanks for your help! Kim
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
do i have to wear a tux or a suit
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached are Environmental Notices regarding two new EPA regulations for glycol dehydrators. One is for dehys on the pipeline from the well to the gas processing plant (Oil & Gas Production MACT) and the other is for dehys downstream of the gas plant on the transmission and underground storage system (Transmission & Storage MACT).
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/30/2000 10:02 AM --------------------------- [email protected] on 06/30/2000 09:52:41 AM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Intra day Midcon (See attached file: HPL-June.xls) - HPL-June.xls
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi Kevin: I understand the challenges of re-organizations. I have attached an updated (shorter) version of my resume' that you can share with your recruiter friend or any one else. Thanks, Gene. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hyatt, Kevin" <[email protected]> To: "gene2222" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 12:16 PM Subject: RE: Gene May resume' Hi Gene, I just wanted to let you know, things here at Enron have been a little hectic. With the restructuring of our Broadband Services unit, several hundred folks are looking to be "re-deployed" in the organization. This may make things a little difficult for outside parties to gain entry; but I'm trying. Also, I have a good friend who is a principal in a local head hunting firm. If you want, I can also forward your resume on to him. Just let me know if that's OK. Best regards, kh -----Original Message----- From: gene2222 [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Gene May resume' Hi Kevin: My sister, Michelle Otteman, suggested I forward my resume' to you for Enron's consideration. As you can tell from the document my primary interest/background is Finance; however, in keeping with Enron's reputation for innovation, I am "open". I appreciate your help. Recently the temp in Michigan has been in the 90's; I think I could get used to Houston. Thanks again, Gene ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Tana, Can we please rush this through? They are ready to trade these products ASAP. Thanks, Bryan -----Original Message----- From: Moran, Tom Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:19 PM To: Hull, Bryan Subject: RE: CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company I just checked profile manager and that is indeed the case. tm -----Original Message----- From: Hull, Bryan Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:16 PM To: Moran, Tom Subject: RE: CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company Is it still in legal? Because it's not opened up in Datamanager. Thanks, Bryan -----Original Message----- From: Moran, Tom Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:14 PM To: Hull, Bryan Subject: RE: CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company Bryan, This change was made effective 5/24/01. Regards, tm -----Original Message----- From: Hull, Bryan Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:59 PM To: Moran, Tom Subject: CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company Any word on getting these guys opened up for Canadian Financial Basis Swaps? Thanks, Bryan
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001 09:36 AM --------------------------- From: Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON 02/22/2001 09:18 AM To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Aparna Rajaram/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Credit Report--2/22/01
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
http://www.science-finance.fr/publications.html http://www.science-finance.fr/publications.html http://www.science-finance.fr/publications.html
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
This request has been pending approval for 15 days and you are the alternate. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078934&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request. Request ID : 000000000078934 Approver : [email protected] Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:26:11 AM Requested For : [email protected] Resource Name : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read] Resource Type : Directory
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
This request has been pending your approval for 55 days. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000067320&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request. Request ID : 000000000067320 Request Create Date : 10/11/01 10:24:53 AM Requested For : [email protected] Resource Name : Risk Acceptance Forms Local Admin Rights - Permanent Resource Type : Applications
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Bob, I faxed over the signed NDA. Please fax back a signed copy from your end. (415) 646-7001. I look forward to seeing the creative brief. Best Regards Bob Shults wrote: > Hi Keith > > Tana Jones from our legal department will be sending you a copy of our non > disclosure agreement for your review. Once we are able to get an agreement > signed I will forward you a copy of the creative brief I discussed with you on > Friday. -- ______________________________________ Keith Figlioli Director of Business Development NOVO Relationship Architects for e-Business Voice 415.291.7116 | Fax 415.646.7001 [email protected] http://www.novocorp.com
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
[IMAGE] Forums Discuss these points in the Forums: Forexnews Forum Technicals Live Charts Analysis available from: Cornelius Luca J.P. Chorek Technical Research Ltd. Charts & News featuring Standard & Poor's Interest Rates US: Japan: Eurozone: UK: Switzerland: 1.75% 0.15% 3.25% 4.0% 1.25-2.25% [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Wall Street Set To End Week Lower, But USD Adds To Gains January 18, 7:00 AM: EUR/$..0.8811 $/JPY..132.84 GBP/$..1.4350 $/CHF..1.6684 Wall Street Set To End Week Lower, But USD Adds To Gains by Jes Black At 8:30:00 AM US Nov Int. Trade (exp -28.8 bln, prev -29.4 bln) At 9:45:00 AM US Jan Univ of Michigan Sent prel (exp 89.3, prev 88.8) The dollar held onto its gains on Friday, going into the US session up about one percent against the majors since Monday. USD rose steadily despite a roughshod week on Wall Street that fluctuated with the mixed data and sentiment. The Dow fell nearly 300 points by mid-week before rallying overnight on more upbeat data and earnings announcements after Wednesday's sell-off. In Tokyo trade, USD/JPY surprised the market with a rally to a 1-week high of 133.03 after holding above support at 132.40 overnight. The move bodes well for a resumption of its rally after a weeklong decline stabilized around 131.80 on Tuesday as corrective yen buying slowed. USD is now targeting last week's 3-year high of 133.37. Support is seen at 132.40 and 131.80, the 61.8% and 38.2% Fibonacci retracements of the move from 133.37 to this week's low of 130.85. Resistance is seen at last week's 3-year high of 133.37 and only a break of this level is seen bringing back the bull, dealers say. EUR/JPY regained the 117 level after hitting an overnight low of 116.01. Again, moves in the JPY will be important to watch as most of EUR/USD losses on Tuesday and Wednesday came on the back of a steep fall in EUR/JPY to a low of 115.67 from a high of 119.37 last week, or a 3% drop. Since EUR/JPY rise was steeper than that of USD/JPY there was a steeper reversal. Support is now seen at 116.50 followed by key support at 115.60. Resistance is seen at 117.00 and 117.50. A close above 116.50 will be needed in order to maintain its bullish momentum, dealers say. Overnight comments from Japan's PM Koizumi and FinMin Shiokawa showed their reluctance to talk about the yen, except to say that it was for markets to determine the appropriate levels. However, BoJ Governor Hayami interjected that no central bank likes a weak currency and that it was important for Japan to maintain a strong yen. Hayami also said other central banks have questioned Japan's yen stance, but that the BoJ is not tolerating a weak yen, nor the MoF. These remarks failed to stem the yen's fall as markets see further weakness ahead for the JPY ahead of painful reforms. EUR/USD hovered in a tight 20 pip range around 88 cents as lack of European data kept currencies movements to a minimum in London trade. Markets are also eyeing this morning's US economic data as well as a key meeting between representatives of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the US Treasury Undersecretary for International Affairs Taylor to discuss the consequences of a strong dollar. Therefore, dealers were careful not to get to enthusiastic about the dollar ahead of today's meeting given that when this happened last July, USD fell because the administration appeared uncertain over the strong dollar policy. NAM Vice President Vargo argues that the strong dollar policy is hurting US exports and slowing down the recovery of the US economy. Vargo thinks that the dollar is currently overvalued because of its strength against the major currencies in spite of the US slowdown. However, manufacturers are unlikely to get the US administration to change its policy given the need to continue to finance the US current account deficit with foreign inflows of capital. A fall in USD would stem that flow. Moreover, the US administration is expected to continue to let JPY fall in order to keep Japan from falling into a deflationary spiral as many economists fear. In fact, the first data to be released today is the international trade figures for November. The large deficit is expected to fall slightly, as it usually does in a recession, to 28.8 from 29.4 billion. Like past recessions, imports are expected to decrease faster than exports as a consequence of the global slowdown. Markets will be more interested in knowing how the consumer perceives the economic outlook and the University of Michigan's confidence survey is forecasted to rise to 89.3 in the preliminary January reading from the previous 88.8. This would be the fourth consecutive gain, but today's consumer sentiment data isn't expected to move markets unless it surprises on the up or downside. Meanwhile, the majority of major earnings announcements came to pass this week. Overnight, Microsoft saw strong sales that topped Wall Street expectations, prompting a rebound in US stocks. Positive earnings from Citigroup, Compaq, General Electric, Apple Computer and Sears, as well as the rebound in the Philadelphia Fed survey pushed the Dow up by 1.4% or 137 points to 9850 and NASDAQ by 2% or 41 points to 1985. But US stock futures look poised to spoil those gains with Dow down 59 and Nasdaq down 25. Today's key release includes Sun Microsystems which is expected to show a small loss in Q4. GBP/USD fell to key support around 1.4330 in European trade after plunging to a 5-week low of 1.4300 overnight. But losses were mitigated by sterling's strength against the euro, which was trading near an overnight 3-week low near 61.20 pence. Since EMU mania subsided EUR/GBP is now back to trading around Jan 1 levels. However, cable's position will remain weak if it cannot maintain above 1.4440 after it fell from last Monday's 2-week high of 1.4513, a 2-cent drop in 4 days. Resistance is seen at 1.4390, 1.4440, 1.4480, 1.450 and 1.4550. Key support at 1.4330, the 50% Fibonacci retracement of the move from 1.4060 to 1.4606. A break of that level would call upon 1.43 on its way to 1.4267, the 61.8% retracement of the same move. USD/CHF fully recovered from Wednesday's 1% sell off to a low of 1.6445. Swissy regained support at 1.6540 and successfully broke back through resistance at 1.6680 on its way to a day's high of 1.6702 in London trade. Gains are seen capped at this week's high of 1.6730, which marks the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement of the move from 1.6955 to 1.6355. Support is seen at 1.6540 and 1.6510. Major trendline support is seen at 1.6460. [IMAGE] Audio Mkt. Analysis Earnings, Philly Fed Survey Support Dollar Articles & Ideas Philly Fed-Supported Optimism EUR/USD: Technical Analysis Articles & Ideas Forex Glossary Economic Indicators Forex Guides Link Library [IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you wish to unsubscribe from this or any other Forexnews.com newsletters, please click here . Any opinions expressed by representatives of Forexnews.com or its affiliates as to the commentary, market information, and future direction of prices of specific currencies reflect the views of the individual analyst, and do not necessarily represent the views of Forexnews.com or its affiliates in any way. In no event shall Forexnews.com or its affiliates have any liability for any losses incurred in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken by any party in reliance upon the information provided in this material; or in any delays, inaccuracies, errors in, or omissions of information.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sounds good. Steve Steve Van Hooser 713-853-7238 713-646-3490 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris <[email protected]> To: Van Hooser, Steve <[email protected]> Sent: Fri Jan 25 15:39:08 2002 Subject: Boston Gas Tenn/Iroq capacity Cullen and Dykman (attorneys for Boston Gas Company) approved all of our changes on the agreement to release the Tenn and Iroq space back to Boston Gas. They also made one other change, they are taking out the "subject to recall" language at the bottom of page 2 under item #1. They will be sending the revised document to me. I will deliver it to you for your approval.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Today, a Florida judge supported FL Secretary of State Katherine Harris' decision to reject hand-counted votes submitted after the November 14 statewide county certification deadline. The judge, a Democrat, found Harris had exercised proper discretion. Governor Bush believes the way to conclude this election, in a fair, accurate and final way, is for the state of Florida to count the remaining overseas ballots, add them to the certified vote, and announce the results, as required by Florida law. Florida citizens are ready for and will accept this result, according to two new polls. According to a new Mason-Dixon poll, 71% of Floridians believe waiting to declare a winner by the end of this weekend is ACCEPTABLE, while 60% believe waiting several weeks to declare a winner is TOO LONG TO WAIT. Furthermore, according to a new NBC/WSJ poll, 81% will accept George W. Bush as winner based on the overseas absentee ballots count plus the current machine tally. ------------------- Meanwhile, the Gore campaign says they want a full, fair and accurate count, but today, the LA Times reports on how they hope to achieve their real objectives... SEASONED DEMOCRATIC ARMY HITS THE SHORES OF FLORIDA excerpts from The Los Angeles Times: "To scrounge for every last vote, Gore has flooded Fort Lauderdale with tough, seasoned Democrats, the sort who are used to keeping wafflers in line and to count and recount votes until they know exactly what it will take to outdo their opponents. Many of the hired hands speak with a Boston brogue... "Not far away, in an abandoned Payless shoe store, vanloads of AFL-CIO staffers and Gore loyalists from New York, Chicago, Nashville, Philadelphia, San Francisco and elsewhere had disembarked to learn how to observe the ballot count. "'Our goal,' said one lawyer as he patiently lectured his new charges, 'is to preserve the Al Gore vote.' The volunteers nodded. 'It's very, very important that if you see any kind of mark--a scratch, a dent, a pinprick in Al Gore's column--that you challenge.' When someone then asked what they should do if they found a Bush ballot with an indent, the lawyer said: 'Keep your lips sealed.' It was hardball that the Bostonians and other imported pros understood well." Full Article: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/decision2000/lat_dems001117.htm _____________________________________________________________ WHY HAND COUNTS ARE FLAWED...editorials and opinions from the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal and New York Times: Not by Hand http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37132-2000Nov16.html The Trouble with Hand-Counting http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=65000635 What's More Partisan: Man or Machine? http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/17/opinion/17REYN.html HOW CAN YOU HELP? FORWARD THIS MESSAGE. _____________________________________________________________ Paid for by Bush Cheney Recount http://www.georgewbush.com ============================================================================== To unsubscribe, please go here: http://www.georgewbush.com/[email protected] To change your e-mail address or any other subscription information, please go here: http://www.georgewbush.com/MyGeorgeW.asp
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I'll call you at 9:00am to see if your available >>> <[email protected]> 10/04/00 05:36PM >>> Jason: She did call and wanted John, you and me. I am available untill roughly 11 am when the lawyers depart for the Woodlands. She indicated that this provision was necessary if we EVER decided to net physical/financial. (Jason: we won't agree to that now and if we ever did, I am sure we would either amend all of our masters or put a separate netting agreement in place). She did indicate that Harvard MIGHT drop the request. I don't particularly want the provision in the agreement. My calendar is open if you want to schedule. SS "JASON PETERS" <PETEJ@andrews- To: <[email protected]> kurth.com> cc: Subject: Harvard 10/04/2000 05:27 PM Sara, Kim Noble called. She was hoping that we could talk in the morning. She indicated that anything before 10:00 AM worked for her. I told her I would pass it on. Jason
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Gerald, I have Bo working on a meeting for Wednesday morning. The attorney for the gas contract is Christie Fanelli - not sure if you know her. She is out today, so it will be tomorrow before we can nail down a time to meet. I'll let you know. Andrew
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
the following are deals that were changed to PPT: 534054 534067 534055 534057 534254
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Glad to see that you made it back to Portland. Sorry about the mess.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Jeff, the quick scoop on Larry Drivon is that he is a graduate of Stanford and and San Francisco Law School.? He's from Stockton and a former San Joaquin County DA.? He's also a retired San Joaquin County judge -- I don't know if that was?a full-time elected position or whether he would be on call to serve as caseloads determine.? He was president of the California Trial Lawyers Association (now California Association of Consumer Attorneys) around 1990 and is currently chairman of the board of trustees of Humphreys School of Law in Stockton. ? He's been involved in at least a?couple of high profile case in the Central Valley, including the case against Ford detailed in the articles below (apparently, the verdict was later overturned due to juror misconduct and a TV show tainted the $290 million verdict).? He was also involved in a highly publicized case in which the Catholic Diocese?of Stockton?was ordered to pay $30 million as the result of molestations by a priest. ? He's well known in trial lawyer circles, and has been a leader in CTLA/CAOC for years.? I'm sure that includes working hard to raise funds for atttorney-backed initiatives (including insurance issues) and candidates.? ? I'll try to get some more substantive info ASAP. ? Ken ? ? ? ? From the Texas tort reform assn. publication: ? Astronomical damage awards set a bad precedent ? by JIM LAFFERTY ? ? Lubbock Avalanche Journal ??Saturday, November 13, 1999 ? ? ? ? ? [IMAGE]E-Mail this article???[IMAGE]Printer-friendly version ? ? ? ? ? MODESTO, Calif. - Now high is up? ? ? That's the question that thousands of giddy personal injury lawyers are asking themselves in the wake, of two astronomical punitive damage awards handed out by California juries within three days of each other in July. ? ? In one of the judgments, Modesto jurors ordered Ford Motor Co. to pay $290 million in punitive damages to a young man whose mother, father and brother were killed when he tipped over his 1978 Bronco on Father's Day 1993. ? ? At the time of the accident, Juan Ramon Romo, then 19, had been driving for a lengthy period of time, so long, in fact, that everyone else in the Bronco - his mother and father, a brother and two sisters had fallen asleep. Going slightly over the speed limit on an interstate highway, Romo attempted illegally to pass another vehicle on the right. ? ? When the other driver decided to move back into the right lane, Romo swerved left and rolled over. His mother, father and brother were killed; he and his two sisters survived. ? ? The $290 million judgment in the Romo case was the second largest ever entered against a U.S. car manufacturer, yet it received little media attention outside the immediate Modesto area. ? ? Hardly surprising, perhaps, since only three days before a Las Angeles jury had set the punitive damage bar impossibly high by ordering General Motors to pay a staggering punitive damage award of $4.9 billion. ? ? By way of a yardstick, that amount surpasses the combined Gross National Product of Afghanistan and Albania. Almost obscured by the astonishing generosity of the jurors in Los Angeles and Modesto, was a salient point that still sends shivers through corporate defense lawyers around the country: By any objective criteria, neither Ford nor General Motors appeared to bear any responsibility for the accidents. ? ? In the Los Angeles case, Patricia Anderson, her four children and a family friend were stopped at a red light in her 1979 Chevy Malibu on Christmas Eve 1993. A drunken driver traveling at 70 mph slammed his car into the Malibu's rear end. The collision ruptured the Malibu's gas tank and ignited the spilled fuel. Mrs. Anderson's four children suffered severe burns. ? ? When police tested the drunken driver he registered a blood alcohol content of 0.20 - twice the legal limit for drivers in California. ? ? Similarly, in the Modesto case, driver error and misjudgment on the part of Romo clearly appeared to be the cause of the accident. ? ? But Romo's lawyer, Lawrence Drivon, immediately blamed the deaths on the Bronco, which he said was susceptible to rollover, and had a defectively designed roof. ? ? Yet the Bronco exceeded all federal safety standards for roof strength in 1978 by more than 100 percent and, in fact, exceeds the 1999 standard by more than 30 percent. ? ? Romo's Bronco also exceeded all federal rollover standards for 1978 model., and federal accident data show the Ford Broncos rollover rate was no higher than that of other SUVs. ? ? It's open to question whether the Bronco had been properly maintained prior to the accident. The vehicle had been on the road for 15 years, had numerous changes in ownership and had nearly 200,000 miles on the odometer. ? ? In addition, Drivon engaged in conduct that borders on jury tampering - mailing to each juror a copy of his book, 'The Civil War on Consumer Rights," whose main thesis is that large American corporations, like Ford, are attempting to close "the courthouse doors" to average Americans by pressing for judicial reforms. In the book, Drivon devotes an entire chapter to Ford's alleged misdeeds. ? ? In part because of Drivon's behavior, a California judge granted Ford's motion to set aside the punitive damage part of the verdict and ordered a new trial. Among other things, he cited improper discussions among the jurors that prejudiced deliberations. ? ? But Ford could be entering double jeopardy with a new trial. Drivon has indicated he will seek to raise the initial punitive award threefold to more than $1 billion. With a sympathetic jury, that could happen. ? ? Damage award, of a few hundred million here and a few hundred million there are still unusual, but California is a national trendsetter. ? ? If juries elsewhere start emulating the ones in Los Angeles and Modesto, our now booming economy could well begin to sputter. ? _______________________________ ? ? Jim Lafferty is a former Associated Press and Philadelphia Daily News reporter who now covers national and international Legal trends as an independent journalist in Washington. Readers may e-mail him at [email protected]. ? ? [IMAGE] California Delivers Second Huge Verdict Against Auto Industry in Just Three Days $295 Million for Three Children Orphaned in Ford Bronco Crash By Christa Zevitas At-A-Glance Size of verdict: $295 million $290 million in punitive damages $5 million in compensatory damages Status: Punitive award overturned and new trial pending. State: California Date of Verdict: July 12, 1999 Length of Trial: 3 months Length of Deliberations: 1 week Case Name: Romo v. Ford Motor Co. Court: Stanislaus County Superior Court, Modesto, Calif. Plaintiffs' Lawyers: Joseph W. Carcione Jr. of Law Offices of Joseph Carcione in Redwood City, Calif. (10 lawyers); Laurence Drivon of Drivon & Tabak in Stockton, Calif. (4 lawyers) Defense Lawyers: Frank Kelly of Dryden, Margoles, Schimaneck, Hartman, Kelly & Wait in San Francisco; Douglas Seitz of Snell & Wilmer in Phoenix, Ariz.; Gary S. Davis of Davis, Echols & Boyd in Modesto, Calif. (6 lawyers) Just three days after a Los Angeles jury hammered General Motors with the largest verdict of the year, another California jury slammed Ford Motor Co. with the year's fifth-largest verdict. The Modesto jury awarded $295 million to three children whose parents and brother died when their 1978 Ford Bronco rolled over in a highway accident. The verdict included $290 million in punitive damages - the second largest punitive award ever against an automaker. The defense argued that the drivers of the two vehicles - not the company - were responsible for the tragedy. But a 12-person jury found the automaker 78% liable for the deaths, concluding that Ford chose to save money by opting for a less sturdy roof design. The jury divided the remaining liability between the two drivers. A company spokesman told The Modesto Bee that "as tragic as [the accident] was, it wasn't our fault, and it wasn't the vehicle's fault." Lawyers for neither the plaintiff nor the defendant could be reached for comment. This story is based on local newspaper and wire stories from the time of the verdict. Bronco Rolls Over On June 20, 1993, 19-year-old Juan Romo was driving five other family members home to northern California when he attempted to pass a van on the right at approximately 50 mph. The van's driver didn't see Romo and changed lanes at the same time, forcing Romo to swerve hard to the right to avoid him. Romo then overcorrected with a hard turn to the left, lost control and, while traveling about 47 mph, the vehicle rolled over - killing Romo's mother, Salustia, 40; his father, Ramon, 39; and his brother, Ramiro, 16. Romo's parents and brother were all wearing their seatbelts and died because the Bronco's roof smashed straight down onto the dashboard and crushed their heads, according to plaintiffs' attorneys. Juan and his two sisters - Evangelina, 14, and Maria, 8 - suffered only minor injuries. Plaintiffs' attorney Joseph Carcione Jr. told The Modesto Bee that the sisters survived because they weren't wearing their seatbelts and were thrown from the Bronco. Romo survived because he ducked below the dashboard, said Carcione, name partner in a 10-lawyer firm in Redwood City, Calif. Romo and his sisters sued Ford, alleging that the automaker knew the Bronco's roof - which was two-thirds plastic - would not hold up in a rollover. Carcione and his co-counsel, Laurence Drivon, argued that Ford knew the roof was unsafe, but decided to save the relatively small cost of reinforcing it with steel - a defect the company corrected in post-1979 model years. According to a press release, Carcione described the roof as a camper top. To manufacture the vehicle, Ford basically chopped off the back portion of a 1978 pickup truck and stuck on the plastic camper top, put a bench seat in the back and removed a warning that had been posted on the camper top that said, "Do Not Ride Under This Camper Top," Carcione said in the release. The plaintiffs' attorneys also contended that the Bronco was unsafe because it was prone to rollover. The vehicle's rollover rate is three to five times higher than any other passenger car and its rollover death rate is almost three times greater than the 1980-1996 model Broncos, they say in a press release. Although Carcione and Drivon lacked explicit documentation to illustrate the Bronco's structural weaknesses, they filled that gap with a prize witness - former Ford executive vice president Tom Feeney, who testified that company officials were aware that the roof was virtually certain to fail in a rollover. Feeney gave additional testimony that in the 27 years he had worked for the company, the Bronco was the worst vehicle Ford ever put out in terms of crashworthiness. Ford countered that the Bronco was perfectly sound and met all federal safety standards, noting that Feeney had "never worked in truck product development." Defense attorneys also argued that Romo was at fault, and that his right-hand passing maneuver was illegal. They contended that the van's driver was also partly to blame. On July 12, 1999, the jury awarded the Romo family $5 million in compensatory damages and $290 million in punitives. At the close of the three-month trial, the plaintiffs' attorneys urged jurors to award punitives totaling $1 billion. They noted after the trial that the $296 million award amounts to only 10 days worth of Ford's net profits. Drivon, partner in a four-lawyer firm in Stockton, Calif., also called the Bronco the most dangerous vehicle Ford ever made. "The American public is waking up to the carnage that's being visited upon the public by some American industries such as tobacco and automobiles," he told the Associated Press. New Trial Pending Following the verdict, defense attorneys asked for a mistrial claiming that Romo's counsel made inflammatory public statements supporting the $4.9 billion GM verdict, which came down while jurors in his own case were still in deliberations. The motion was denied. Ford appealed, and on Sept. 15, the trial judge ordered a new trial on punitives, finding that the case was tainted by juror misconduct. One juror told others of a 60 Minutes II segment about Ford Mustangs and fuel-tank fires, and told them it was "evidence of Ford's malice regarding the 1978 Bronco," wrote Superior Court Judge Roger Beauchesne. Another juror told the jury of "a morbid nightmare" she had in which her child and other jurors' children were killed in a Bronco rollover while being taunted by Ford attorneys, the judge wrote. Beauchesne said the two jurors' comments may have influenced the deliberations and noted that the jury vote on punitive damages was 9-3, the exact majority needed. The Wall Street Journal reported that Carcione said he's "delighted" to try the case again. "Reversing the $290 million award was no victory for Ford. The next jury will award even higher damages," said Carcione in a press release. "Four of the jurors in the last trial wanted to assess punitive damages at a billion dollars or more. The $290 million amount was reached as a compromise." Drivon echoed Carcione's thoughts. "Sooner of later, Ford will have to accept what 12 American jurors will continue to say: That this Bronco is the result of malicious actions by Ford who willfully put profits ahead of people," he said in a press release. Beauchesne upheld the jury's unanimous finding that the Bronco's defective roof caused the deaths of Romo's family members. While Ford expressed its gratitude at the new punitives trial, it may appeal the compensatory damage award as well as the jury's finding of liability. According to wire reports, Drivon advised Ford not to celebrate prematurely. "The best they get out of this is that they're exposed to the verdict of a second jury," he told the Associated Press. , 2000 Lawyers Weekly Inc., All Rights Reserved - email.gif - print.gif - ehhot2.gif
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The following expense report is ready for approval: Employee Name: Stanley C. Horton Status last changed by: Stanley C. Horton Expense Report Name: December Business Expenses Report Total: $795.85 Amount Due Employee: $795.85 To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense. http://expensexms.enron.com
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
FYI. It's been reported that the legislative committee intends to subpoena generators and marketers to testify before the committe, though nothing in this press release mentions any subpoenas. Jeff ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/08/2001 10:26 PM ----- "Katie Kaplan" <[email protected]> 01/08/2001 06:00 PM Please respond to kaplan To: "John Larrea" <[email protected]>, "Douglas Kerner" <[email protected]>, "Andy Brown" <[email protected]>, "B Brown Andy" <[email protected]>, "Bob Weisenmiller" <[email protected]>, "Jan Smutny-Jones" <[email protected]>, "Jean Munoz" <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich" <[email protected]>, "John Stout" <[email protected]>, "Julee Malinowski-Ball" <[email protected]>, "Karen Edson" <[email protected]>, "Kassandra Gough" <[email protected]>, "Katie Kaplan" <[email protected]>, "Kristin Vellandi" <[email protected]>, "Marty Wilson" <[email protected]>, "McNally Ray" <[email protected]>, "Norton Kelli" <[email protected]>, "Paula Hall-Collins" <[email protected]>, "Richard Hyde" <[email protected]>, "Stephanie-Newell" <[email protected]>, "Sue Mara" <[email protected]>, "Tom Ross" <[email protected]>, "Susan J Mara" <[email protected]>, "Scott Noll" <[email protected]>, "Randy Hickok" <[email protected]>, "Lynn Lednicky" <[email protected]>, "Kent Fickett" <[email protected]>, "Kate Castillo" <[email protected]>, "Jim Willey" <[email protected]>, "Frank DeRosa" <[email protected]>, "Eileen Koch" <[email protected]>, "Dave Parquet" <[email protected]>, "Curtis Kebler" <[email protected]>, "Mark Smith" <[email protected]>, "Carolyn Baker" <[email protected]>, "Cody Carter" <[email protected]>, "Curt Hatton" <[email protected]>, "Eric Eisenman" <[email protected]>, "Greg Blue" <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich" <[email protected]>, "Kent Palmerton" <[email protected]>, "Rob Lamkin" <[email protected]>, "Roger Pelote" <[email protected]>, "Sue Mara" <[email protected]>, "William Hall" <[email protected]>, "Ted Cortopassi" <[email protected]>, "Rich Dyer" <[email protected]>, "Lucian Fox" <[email protected]>, "Alex Sugaoka" <[email protected]>, "Bill Adams" <[email protected]>, "Bill Carlson" <[email protected]>, "Bill Woods" <[email protected]>, "Bob Ellery" <[email protected]>, "Bob Escalante" <[email protected]>, "Dean Gosselin" <[email protected]>, "Doug Fernley" <[email protected]>, "Doug Levitt" <[email protected]>, "Duane Nelsen" <[email protected]>, "Ed Maddox" <[email protected]>, "Ed Tomeo" <[email protected]>, "Frank Misseldine" <[email protected]>, "Hap Boyd" <[email protected]>, "Jack Pigott" <[email protected]>, "Joe Greco" <[email protected]>, "Joe Ronan" <[email protected]>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <[email protected]>, "Ken Hoffman" <[email protected]>, "Ken Salvagno" <[email protected]>, "Marty McFadden" <[email protected]>, "Milt Schultz" <[email protected]>, "Nam Nguyen" <[email protected]>, "Paul Wood" <[email protected]>, "Paula Soos" <[email protected]>, "Pete Levitt" <[email protected]>, "Robert Frees" <[email protected]>, "Ross Ain" <[email protected]>, "Steve Iliff" <[email protected]>, "Steve Ponder" <[email protected]>, "Thomas Heller" <[email protected]>, "Tony Wetzel" <[email protected]>, "Ward Scobee" <[email protected]>, "Wayne Kawamoto" <[email protected]> cc: "Carol H Hudson" <[email protected]>, "Steven Kelly" <[email protected]> Subject: Speaker Hertzberg Names Committee To Handle Energy Crisis. Members Will Organize Statewide Public Hearings, Examine Financial Practices and Craft Policy. For Immediate Release:January 8, 2001 Contact: Paul Hefner Phone:(916) 319-2408 Speaker Hertzberg Names Committee To Handle Energy Crisis. Members Will Organize Statewide Public Hearings, Examine Financial Practices and Craft Policy. SACRAMENTO - Working quickly to address the state's energy crisis, Assembly Speaker Robert M. Hertzberg (D-Van Nuys) and Assembly Minority Leader Bill Campbell (R-Villa Park) announced today the formation of a new committee that will hold public hearings across the state, shape legislation and probe financial practices among utilities and generators. "The public deserves to know what went wrong. They deserve to know where the money went. They deserve answers, and we are going to get them," Speaker Hertzberg said. "In addition, members of the committee will hold hearings around the state to assess the impact of this crisis in every region of California." "I applaud the Speaker's decision to form a special committee to address the energy crisis," said Minority Leader Campbell (R-Villa Park). "He has indicated a desire to make the committee bi-partisan and Republicans look forward to working cooperatively to resolve the significant energy crisis that California faces." Aside from shaping the state's energy policy during the special session, the Assembly Committee on Energy Costs and Availability will hold public hearings across the state, seeking comment from ratepayers, small-business owners and consumers on how the energy crunch is affecting them. "This committee's first priority regarding the setting of rates for electric power will be price stability," said Assemblymember Roderick D. Wright (D-South Central Los Angeles), who Speaker Hertzberg named as Chairman of the Assembly Committee on Energy Costs and Availability. "This deregulation experiment has been risky and expensive, and has put the economic well-being of this state in jeopardy." The committee will work with the staff of the Speaker's Office of Oversight to determine how utility companies have spent the money they received for their stranded costs, and what generators have done with their dramatic influx of cash. "The public has a right to know where that money has gone," said Assemblymember Darrell Steinburg. "We will conduct a thorough investigation to determine just that." The Speaker noted that David Wiggs, who helped restructure the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power in 1997, has been retained as an advisor to the committee. Wiggs will help the committee sort through market reforms and oversight of past utility spending. Wiggs is a retired chairman of El Paso Electric Co. and an experienced advisor for issues related to the electric utility industry. He is largely credited for leading El Paso Electric through a multi-year bankruptcy proceeding. "There is no doubt that the state's consumers are faced with the most serious energy crisis in decades," said Assembly Speaker pro Tem Fred Keeley (D- Boulder Creek). "We are focused on market reforms, demand responsiveness measures and measures to stabilize the energy supplies. Consumers will only genuinely be protected from increasing energy prices when substantive reforms of the market place are adopted and take hold. Specifically we must, through legislative and regulatory actions, reform the way electricity is bought and sold and the way we contract for power on a long-term basis." Speaker Hertzberg named the following additional members to the new committee: Assemblymember Anthony Pescetti (R-Rancho Cordova) (Vice-chair) Assembly Speaker pro Tem Fred Keeley (D-Boulder Creek) Assemblymember Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) Assemblymember Juan Vargas (D-National City) Assemblymember Jenny Oropeza (D-Long Beach) Assemblymember Manny Diaz (D-San Jose) Assemblymember Charlete Zettel (R-Poway) Assemblymember Keith Richman (R-Los Angeles) Assemblymember Richard Dickerson (R-Redding) Assemblymember Joe Canciamilla (D-Pittsburg) Assemblymember John Dutra (D-Fremont) Assemblymember Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara) Assemblymember Carole Migden (D-San Francisco) Assemblymember Sarah Reyes (D-Fresno) Assemblymember Bill Leonard (R-Rancho Cucamonga) Assemblymember John Campbell (R-Orange County) Assemblymember Mike Briggs (R-Clovis) #### ASSEMBLYMEMBER ROBERT HERTZBERG 40TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT Capitol Office: P.O. Box 942849 -- Sacramento, CA 94249-0001 -- (916) 319-2040 District Office: 6150 Van Nuys Boulevard, Suite 305 -- Van Nuys, CA 91401 -- (818) 376-4040 Katie Kaplan Manager of State Policy Affairs Independent Energy Producers Association (916) 448-9499
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I am sending you the new Guaranty from SJ to ENA. SJ has requested we return their original gty for $5MM which expires 11/30 now replaced by the new one. I will be happy to send them the old gty if you will send same to me. dp Debra Perlingiere Enron North America Legal 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885 Houston, Texas 77002 dperlin@enron 713-853-7658 713-646-3490 Fax
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sarah -- Looks fine. Did Craig Roach contribute? I wonder if we should highlight the Interconnection problems we are having with new generation? I know that most of the delays are Siting related, but it is unclear to me if the ISO or the local utility is the right point of contact. This would help us nationally and gives FERC an "answer" - enforce your Interconnection policies!! Also, this doesn't mention any possible market flaws. Do we think that some exist? Are any of the AS markets manipulated? EPSA needs to make sure that it takes an honest approach to this situation or its credibility will be destroyed. Has Craig Roach looked into this? Jim Sarah Novosel@ENRON 09/05/2000 02:39 PM To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, [email protected], Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES cc: Subject: California "Fact Sheet" Here is EPSA's "Fact Sheet" on California. We're discussing it at the EPSA power marketers' weekly conference call tomorrow. We're also considering having EPSA submit this Fact Sheet to the CPUC in response to the data requests sent by the CPUC (responses are due on Friday). If you have any comments or suggested changes, please let me know (as soon as possible) in case EPSA submits this paper to the CPUC. Thanks Sarah ---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 09/05/2000 03:30 PM --------------------------- "Jackie Gallagher" <[email protected]> on 08/30/2000 01:20:16 PM To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> cc: Subject: California "Fact Sheet" MEMORANDUM TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee Power Marketing Working Group FROM: Donald Santa, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair Joe Hartsoe, Power Marketing Working Group Chair Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy DATE: August 30, 2000 RE: California "Fact Sheet" At our meetings last week with FERC, we had a great deal of valuable factual information and policy suggestions, but they were not pulled together as a cohesive story. Based on materials provided by various companies, we have drafted the attached fact sheet entitled "California: The Real Story." It is an effort to pull together the most compelling pieces of information and policy arguments as a "leave-behind" for FERC staff and other regulators and to form the basis for any testimony at the upcoming congressional hearings. The paper includes factual information pulled from a number of sources and Jackie Gallagher, EPSA's Research Assistant, is attempting to verify and cite as many facts as possible. To make the message convincing, we need "chapter and verse" on our facts. Please review the material carefully to be sure it is accurate and compelling. Any assistance in verifying these facts, or providing others that do a better job of telling our story, will be appreciated. You can e-mail to Jackie at [email protected]. We will discuss the paper during our conference call next Wednesday, September 6 at 11:00 a.m. (EDT). To access the call, dial 1-800-937-6563 and ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA call. If you have any questions or suggestions before Wednesday, please contact Julie Simon at 202-789-7200. Attachment Jacqueline Gallagher Research/Policy Assistant Electric Power Supply Association 1401 H Street, NW Suite 760 Washington, DC 20005 202.789.7200 202.789.7201 [email protected] - CALIFORNIA2.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Paul, I am sending you modified bullet points. The modifications are in red. Apologies for a delay in responding to your messages. By the way, Power2001 gets only more and more interesting every day. Vince
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
While there were some attempts late last week to attach the Senate pipeline safety bill to final appropriations package before Congress adjourned, the legislation was not included. While Senator John McCain (R-AZ) requested that the measure not be included in any spending bills, House and Senate Republicans at the negotiating table over the Labor-HHS bill did propose inclusion of the pipeline safety bill. However, House Democrats -- in particular, Rep. David Obey (D-WI) and Jim Oberstar (D-MN) -- voiced strong objections, so the bill was not included. Jeffrey Keeler Director, Environmental Strategies Enron 1775 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 466-9157 - phone (202) 331-4717 - fax (888) 502-6856 or [email protected] - pager
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sally Further to our discussion on Friday I summarise my view of Joe Gold's issues with the MO control process Joe expressed some frustration with the current status as follows: - The DPR has historically been 'filled with noise' around adjustments for edits on trades, provision restatements etc which negates it's effectiveness for him as a control/supervisory report The risk team appear to have been reacting to p&l 'noise' - particularly around transmission adjustments rather than proactively finding booking solutions - or instructing IT to flex Enpower Settlements have gained a perception in the market place for 'errors' such that originators are informing Joe that business is being 'lost' due to our perceived inability to support transactions - ( must be careful here as no specifics on errors have been provided ) The risk team ( post Neil Tarling's transfer to EBS ) is relatively junior and does not possess many 'years' of experience of Power support James New as Power,Gas and Credit Controller has ( necessarily ) too broad a role for him to focus on these detailed issues In mitigation The recent continental book split ( which is only now being 'settled' in to the daily process) and the clean up of historic provisions/reserves prior to Neil Tarling's transfer has exaggerated the base issue around certainty of daily p&l Designing an approximate booking process for transmission has not been a top priority for the risk team in the recent past ( this was either wrong or the prioritisation call was not effectively communicated to Joe ) - and it is felt that there are no IT resources to code these solutions to Enpower ( also London struggles to influence Houston IT resource prioritisation ) The settlements infrastructure has been supporting a business volume growth it is not designed for and supporting acitivity on this platform requires 'skilled' staff ( we are down on resources for Continental Power ) - continuing growth in volumes are expected along with junior settlement staff being asked to join Commercial groups We are experiencing generational change as a result of Barry's move to EBS - resourcing is James and my top priority I believe what Joe is asking for, is what we are trying to provide - namely : upgrade in resourcing in the risk group where we are insisting that the lead individual has full responsibility, end to end, for the business including the assessment of operational risk and effectiveness of the business process, focus on identifying and implementing the necessary quick hit solutions that eliminates 'manual workarounds' and consequently 'noise' in the process more proactive communication with Commercial - especially to manage expectations a definitive plan for how the strategic upgrade in applications architecture for MO will benefit/change his business support However, we are behind in finding the 'right' replacement for Neil ( one with experience and breadth of view potential ), we have found a continental power settlemetns manager but he does not arrive until July 3 rd, we have been struggling with book split when that should have been completed a month ago and it is taking time to get all the ducks lined up re our plans for Enlighten/DTL/EnVoice/Autoconfirms/DCAF - hence his frustration about lost business opportunities NOW!! Hence I would love to find someone who could deliver the above ( ie be Neil Tarling's replacement ) or could assist us in providing and communicating the judgement calls on transmission and other adjustments - so improving perception of C.P. DPR prioritising and influencing Enpower development agenda ( along with others ) project manage issues around 'unstable' documentation and settlement process vis a vis client sensitivity provide leadership in changing expectations/perceptions I'm sorry for the length of the note but it may help you in determining a 'best fit' person Please call if any of the above is unclear. Mike
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Here are the responses to my CIPCO questions 1. Henwood Energy is a third party evaluation consultant. They will review the RFP responses 2. Burns & McDonald has assisted in site selection/review and will participate in evaluation of any self-builds that CIPCO does. 3. CIPCO has a preference to purchase from the market or from plants that Enron would develop. They are not big on wanting to build their own plant or JV. 4. CIPCO has identified a key site in Iowa that has direct access to their own system as well as the Mid-Am system. They would make that site available to us if we needed it. They will not reveal the site unless we get into negotiations. 5. CIPCO will consider terms longer than 5 years. They would consider a 15-20 year term if there was a capital project involved. 6. CIPCO does have their own transmission system as well as point/point transmission agreements on Mid-Am and Alliant. The point to point agreement are from plants where CIPCO owns a partial share to CIPCO's system. 7. CIPCO appeared to not value the LM-6000 technology to any higher degree than other machines. 8. CIPCO was not sure of how things would be financed. 9. If CIPCO decided to self build, they would certainly be interested in working with Enron on the gas deal.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi, Guess you are back safe and sound. Hope you enjoyed the trip. We are full of allergies again. Robert Thornton works for the NBC affiliate in TYLER . It is KETK but for some reason I can't access them on the computer. He is the morning weatherman. Dark hair, thin and glasses and appears to be about the right age. Lyn is still having problems and is miserable. More later. Mom
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Grant, Did you meet him? What about John Hopley's group? Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 08:38 AM --------------------------- [email protected] on 05/31/2000 11:02:06 PM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Fwd: Followup Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from rly-yb02.mx.aol.com (rly-yb02.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.2]) by air-yb03.mail.aol.com (v74.10) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 May 2000 23:27:27 -0400 Received: from web4704.mail.yahoo.com (web4704.mail.yahoo.com [216.115.105.204]) by rly-yb02.mx.aol.com (v74.10) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 May 2000 23:26:03 -0400 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Received: from [209.255.164.165] by web4704.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 31 May 2000 20:26:03 PDT Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 20:26:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Saneev Khanna <[email protected]> Subject: Followup To: [email protected], [email protected] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1714636915-959829963=:19952" X-Mailer: Unknown Vince: I wanted to touch base with you and answer any further questions that you may have. I have decided not to relocate to Bethesda, as a part of the PG&E Energy Trading move. Please find enclosed an updated copy of my resume. Please let me know when you would like to meet. I can be reached at h: (281) 646-1573 or o: (713) 371-6647. ===== Sanjeev K Khanna, M.Sc., P. Eng. Director, Quantitative Risk Management PG&E Energy Trading 1100 Louisiana Street, Suite 1000 Houston, Texas 77002 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ - ResumeSanjeevKhanna.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi, I did make the cut and I'm one of the three, in fact I've got to stay around for a certain period of time before Enron will let me go. I think I'll stay put through the holidays and then see what happens during the first part of January. I hope your flight went well! It looks like the weather will be nice on Friday and cold and snowy on Saturday. Enjoy your time on the slopes and I'll talk to you soon. Paul -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Match.com - You've Got Mail: Hey Hey-- Well, as far as I know, the phone number works! :-) Talking next week would be fine. I'll be back in Philly as of Sun evening. ie: EST, 2 hours ahead of Denver :-) I'm not sure if I should be offering my congratulations or not, you failed to mention whether you were one of the 3 who made the final cut... regardless, you sound like you're hanging in there. I'm sitting in the airport, on my way home and thrilled to be doing so. Talk to you later! Steph [email protected] wrote: Hey, Thanks for the phone number, I hope it works! It's a little crazy for me this weekend also. Why don't I call you during the first part of next week and see if we can set something up. What time zone will you be in? As far as the job goes, three in this office made the final cut. So we are waiting around for our next set of orders. I'll explain more later. Take care. Paul ********************************************************* ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com: Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line. You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the site. However: * Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your messag! e as we are unable to remove these. * Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want your email to remain anonymous. Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our Match.com Service Agreement. _____ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your holiday gifts! ********************************************************* IMPORTANT TIPS TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS AT Match.com: If you use the "reply" button to respond to this message, please take the following steps: 1. DELETE ALL TEXT from the body of your message, including header information which may include your actual email address. 2. REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURES which may include your personal contact information. Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address (in the From: field), so that it will NOT appear in the "From:" line. However, DO NOT use the "Cc:" or "Bcc:" fields as these addresses CANNOT be stripped away. You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by clicking "Contact this person" and composing your message directly from the site. Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our Match.com Service Agreement.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Angie, would you go into Unify on July 31st and change the pathed volume to Clinton from 430 to 651 please - this should make the total volume = 13,551. Change the supply from Phillips to balance out the transaction. From: Donnie Myers @ ENRON 08/22/2000 01:43 PM To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Peoples deal with Clinton Chris, I just finished talking with you about a deal that we sold to Clinton Energy Management (Deal #320094). The volume that we have in our system has a volume of 13,330 MMBtu and it should be 13,551 MMBtu @ 4.56 (We only need to change the volume). Could you please change this as soon as possible so that I can get a corrected invoice to them? Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks...
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Mark and I met with Mark Haedicke regarding utilities and the need for a legal opinion from the utility counterparty. We have agreed with Mark as follows: 1. Our negotiations with investor owned utilities should be based upon our standard ISDA Schedule (ISDA Multicurrency Agreement) AND including the "Additional Termination Event". Neither party should be required to provide a legal opinion. 2. Investor owned utilites will be approved for online trading from a legal viewpoint. The extra "Additional Termination Event" paragraph is not currently included in the GTC's but COULD be incorporated if there is a revision to the online agreement. 3. Our position with respect to municipals/municipal owned utilities, federal/state/local owned utilities and cooperatives remains unchanged. We should still utilize and update the "municipal ISDA" form, and, require a legal opinion from the counterparty. In that regard, Susan Flynn has been working on an "omnibus" format for an electric co-op (Deseret Generation and Transmission Co-operative), an earlier version of which could be used as a template for a municipal omnibus confirmation.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Great news, everyone. For the third consecutive year, Fortune magazine has named Enron one of the nation's top employers on its annual "100 Best Companies to Work for in America" list. This year Enron ranks No. 22, up from No. 24 last year. We continue to move up on Fortune's list, which shows that you, our employees, believe Enron is a cool place to work. Thanks to all of you who took time from your busy schedules to share your Enron experiences with Fortune in its confidential survey. Your contributions this past year have raised Enron's profile as we've enjoyed unprecedented achievements. So give yourself a pat on the back for a job well done and for contributing to one of corporate America's great success stories. We look forward to continuing the momentum in 2001 and wish you and your family a pleasant holiday season and a Happy New Year.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
It looks like 491916 duplicated a strip contained in 491893. I spoke with Diana Scholtes, and she wanted to keep both deals, but she deleted the extra strip in 491893. Let me know if this works with Tacoma. Thanks, Kate Stephanie Piwetz 01/09/2001 12:09 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Tacoma Deals Kate, I received a call from Tricia Allen of Tacoma, and she was inquiring about two deals that happened yesterday: Deal 491893.01, she agrees with Deal 491916.01 she does not agree with I left her a message that they showed as good deals in our system and she called back and said she does not agree with Deal 491916.01. Can you check with Sean Crandall and have the two traders talk. Thanks Stephanie
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
THE ENRON SHUTTLE WILL PICK YOU UP AT 11:40 ON ANDREWS ST, TAKE YOU TO IRMA'S SOUTHWEST GRILL AT 1314 TEXAS - RESERVATIONS FOR 12 NOON UNDER JEFF'S NAME, AND THE ENRON SHUTTLE WILL PICK YOU UP THERE AT 130 PM-- Joanne Rozycki Senior Administrative Assistant Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB3880D Houston, TX 77002 Phone: (713) 853-5968 Fax: (713) 646-3490 Email: [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dear Bro...how are you ?.... haven't talked in ages... so to me that means all is well..... Melinda said yu guys tried to call on Xmas... you must have dialed srong #... oh well... I had a wonderful day...Lon and I gave each other a dining? delight at Emeril Lagase's Del Monico Steak House...( fancy fancy place) it was grand... you know one of those joints that they remove your fork every too minutes and replace water glasses and flame your desserts!!!! It was really fun....so is our new space in the sun....it is sooooooo quiet here,the refigerator makes too much noise...tee hee ...any way we just got back from a trip to Joshua Tree Calif...out where the hippies play and young rock? climbers hang...it was? lots of fun.. very beautiful!!!Spud and Lupe D walk the desert and climbed rocks a fun family outting..well Lon is making Thai food with spicy peanut sauce so I should go and check it out..love to you Jboy hope all is good ..later LLLLLGGRRRLLL
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
It was so nice to hear from you. I am glad all is well. I am glad the new home is being enjoyed and that you have a job that you like. I am anxious to get the news of the birth of your new grandchild. Please let us know as soon as possible after the Geraldine delivers. Also let us know what hospital she is in where we can send an appropiate gift to mother and child. My best to you and your family. "dario bravo" <[email protected]> on 05/08/2001 10:06:07 PM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: To my great Friend Dear Stanley: Before hand I'll let you know that we are doing great back home at Down Under. We have bought our new home and are enjoying it completly. We receives the photos that you sent us of the twins and we must congradulate you that they are absolutly beautiful. Please let us know how you and the family are doing. I'll let you know that I'm working doing a small delivery job for a Bakers Factory, nothing to do with what I was doing but I like it just the same. It's a very early start but I finish before lunch and that gives me time to look for a part time job in the afternoon. After I spoke with Paul in the meeting, he said that he was going to introduce me to other companies from the field, but I haven't heard from him since then. I won't lose my hope to work for Enron some day. Geraldine is doing fine and has two weeks left before the baby's due, Chris is doing very good at school and keeping up very well with his soccer training and Vicky is doing fine also and very happy with what's going on. Do you still watch Stock Car racing? Let us know how things are going because we haven't got cable tv yet so we are pretty left out on sport news. Hope to hear from you real soon, here's my new address so we can send letters apart from mailing. 8 BENNISON ROAD, HINCHINBROOK - N.S.W. - 2168 PH:(02) 8783 9273 Our kindest regards for you and to the rest of the family and a special kiss to the twins. Dario and family _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sara, Samantha, I spoke with Guillaume this morning. He suggested that we do the PrimeTrade Access Agreement first. This allows us to get the CD for the PrimeTrade application and to install it on a PC here, roll it out to the traders, and have CSFB come in for trainng. At the same time we can complete the clearing agreement. We will not do the give up agreement. If we decide we can do easily in the future. Guillaume suggested that you call him if you have any questions. He will be happy to facilitate. Sheila ---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000 10:56 AM --------------------------- "De Dalmas, Guillaume" <[email protected]> on 08/01/2000 09:31:17 AM To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: CSFB legal docs Dear Sheila My colleagues have told me that you have received the following CSFB documents. * PrimeTrade access agreement * standardized give ups * clearing docs * futures fees. Please let me know if you need any help or have any questions , I will make sure that you get answers right away. Sincerely G de Dalmas Guillaume de Dalmas Director CREDIT | FIRST SUISSE | BOSTON Prime Brokerage & Listed Derivatives Eleven Madison Avenue New York, NY 10010-3629 email:[email protected] Tel: 212-325-2730 Fax: 603-250-4916 Mobile: 914-830-4842 [INFO] -- Content Manager: This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of any such entity. Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Thought you would find Kyran's observation of some interest/humour. mcs ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 29/03/2001 10:45 --------------------------- Kyran Hanks 29/03/2001 10:43 To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Edison Mark If Southern California Edison is the same company as Edison Mission, you will presumably be pointing out to your American colleagues that while Edison are complaining about generators taking advantage of the California situation to the detriment of customers, Edison are doing exactly the same here by selling power into the balancing market at o5000 / MWh! K.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
This draft looks ok to me. Just to make sure the logic is being transmitted to the authors of the communiques, we obvioiusly need to get a pop for the investment community from selling assets and increasing return on equity. At the same time we need to communicate to partners, customers and regulators that Enron is still there, which is the basis for some of our contracts and concessions. This dual benefit is the main conceptual value in the summer deal, if it is done, and needs to guide our communication strategy which will inevitably involve the same message going to investors as goes to our counterparts in the markets in question. ,---------------------- Forwarded by James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/03/2000 10:14 AM --------------------------- Miguel Padron@ENRON 08/02/2000 01:20 PM To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT cc: Subject: New Summer Release See attachment...please provide feedback. Miguel ---------------------- Forwarded by Miguel Padron/SA/Enron on 08/02/2000 02:20 PM --------------------------- Karen Denne 08/02/2000 11:29 AM To: John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dennis Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith Miceli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Johan Zaayman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aaron Brown/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Miguel Padron/SA/Enron@Enron, Janie Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Subject: New Summer Release The attached draft press release incorporates IR's comments.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
You said last week that you might make a call Wharton on my behalf and I should stop by sometime this week. I was hoping to take you up on your offer and wondered when would be a good time for me to come see you. Thank you, Beth Beth Cowan Enron Freight Markets Phone: 713-853-9868 Fax: 713-853-6061
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I want to remind each of you to attend the Enron Employee Meeting tomorrow at 10 a.m. in the Hyatt Regency Imperial Ballroom. I hope to introduce many of you at the meeting, so please plan to sit up front. Seats will be held for you. This will be a very important meeting. I look forward to seeing you there. Regards, Ken P.S. Remember to bring your badges -- security will be checking to ensure only employees are allowed in.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached please find the proposed credit terms for the draft ISDA. Comments or questions, please call. Ed Sacks
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I saw in the press that N.M. has delayed electric open access until Jan 1, 02 for residentials and small commercials and to July 1, 02 for large industrials. That increases the likelihood that the Pueblo project will have to dump power in the wholesale market at 4 Corners for a while before retail markets start to open up. One more thing to factor in. I'm expecting to hook up with Bill Votaw of Enron Federal Solutions today to talk about Langley's "sole source" procurement strategy with DOE. I hope to get Votaw on the phone with Langley's D.C. govt. contracts lawyers to discuss their theory. We should be in a better position to raise a flag if the sole source strategy is really a high risk approach. I'm not sure where that would leave us because the only other approach I can think of is to steer DOE into opening the power plant up for bids. Langley does not appear interested in trying to win an open bid for the power plant, although frankly we would probably have about as good a chance as anyone of winning. Once we clear up the government contracts issues (if ever) it seems to me that it would be time to expand the team to include Federal Solutions (potentially, if they see an angle to help them with their Kirtland outsourcing strategy) and ENA. The ENA involvement would be particularly important so we could get a line of specific turbine availability and the specifications/economics that would result. I'm probably engaging in wishful thinking again, but my hope is that the economics on a specific turbine/heat exchanger configuration work out a little better than the generic economics from the model that James ran. If we think this thing is a potentially viable deal after I talk to Votaw and the Langley DC team, we need to grab Bill Cordes and discuss whether we go to ENA "from the bottom up," or through Stan "from the top down" to get hooked into a deal team over there. Kevin, I still intend to hook you into the Votaw-DC call if you are available. Thanks. DF
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Lavorato Self Evaluation/Accomplishments I'm just simply better than everyone else.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Ilan, I was incorrect in what I told you earlier today regarding the types of availability data included in these two reports. What I told you was that both reports include the "EA" (Enron Availability) term and they should be the same. When I checked this out I discovered that the O&M Report provides the contractual availability and not "EA". The MOOP is mislabeled and should correspond to the Owners Report. We will fix this error on the next report. I apologize for the confusion. Hollis From: Ilan Caplan on 04/16/2002 11:16 AM To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON cc: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron Subject: Weekly Report vs. O&M Report Hollis - Per the phone conversation earlier today, below is a chart exhibiting the differences between the Monthly Operational Report (Mark Fisher) and the Weekly MTD (John Ruiz) numbers posted on the web. Both cases should include the numbers through the end of the month. From what we discussed, my understanding is that the chart should pool from the same source. Please let me know if I am viewing this information incorrectly. Thanks, Ilan
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Stein, Neil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 7:14 AM To: undisclosed-recipients Subject: CSFB Independent Power Weekly-Issue #38; Response to BarronsArti cle Included Good Morning, Attached, please find the latest issue of our Independent Power Weekly. <<IPW080601.pdf>> Also note that on September 10 and 11, CSFB will host a Power Generation Supply Chain Conference at the Plaza Hotel in New York City. This event is designed to provide investors with a wholistic perspective on all aspects of the sector-from coal and natural gas companies, to equipment and construction service providers, to the power producers themselves. Please contact us if you would like additional information. 1. IPPs Rise 0.4% Last week our IPP composite rose 0.4%, slightly underperforming both the NASDAQ (+1.8%) and the S&P 500 (+0.7%). Mirant, which was up 6.1%, was the strongest performer in the group. Shaw Group was the weakest performer, falling 5.9%. 2. Barrons Predicts "Power Glut" Over the weekend an article in Barrons suggested that the industry was facing a generation capacity glut, which would have negative investment implications for some of the Independent Power Producers. In support of this thesis, the article cited the large number of announced capacity additions as well as recent power price trends. We dispute this article's conclusions for 3 reasons. 1. Announced capacity additions cannot be taken at face value; 2. The article's thesis does not consider the potential for retirement of existing capacity, and 3. The regional characteristics of the power generation market resist such broad sweeping generalizations. 3. Credit Spreads Continue to Improve Importantly, while our IPP equity composite has traded off more than 10% over the last few weeks, IPP credit spreads continue to tighten. For example, while Calpine shares have traded off 11% since July 6, the spreads on CPN's 10 year 8.5% notes due 2011 have actually tightened by more than 50 basis points. Last week alone, CPN spreads tightened by 12 basis points, while the stock traded off 3%. To cite another example, while Mirant shares have traded off 8% over the same period, the spreads on MIR's 7.9% notes due 2009 have tightened by 55 basis points. 4. Q2 Earnings Review Last week second quarter earnings results were reported by Black Hills, Cleco, DPL, Entergy, Mirant and Orion Power. Upside surprises were reported by DPL, ETR, MIR and ORN. Versus expectations, Mirant's results were the strongest, coming in 21% above our estimate. Cleco was the only company that posted an earnings disappointment, reporting Q2 results that were 22% below our estimate. 5. Power Market Update Last week power prices were up considerably as evidenced by the 27% increase in the Mirant National Power Index. With the exception of the Western market, power prices got a boost from hot temperatures that blanketed most of the country. The Texas market experienced unusual volatility owing to recent wholesale market design changes and the initiation of a retail competition pilot program. Regards, Neil Stein 212/325-4217 This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of any such entity. Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Nigeria LNG Signs MOUs With Enron, Iberdrola 10/03/2001 Dow Jones Energy Service (Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.) LAGOS -(Dow Jones)- Nigeria LNG Ltd has signed memoranda of understanding with Enron Corp. and Spanish power company Iberdrola for the sale of LNG volumes from the 4th and 5th production units of its expansion program, NLNG said in a statement released here Wednesday. Nigeria LNG plans to commence production from the two new units in 2005. However, it needs firm sales agreements accounting for all the production from those units before it will finalize the invesment. The latest deals bring to 6.5 BCM/year the LNG volume from units four and five already committed. Each of the new production units will have capacity of 4 BCM/year. Nigeria LNG and Enron had earlier signed an MOU for 1 billion cubic meters per year for the expansion program, also known as NLNG Plus volumes. The second agreement raises Enron's share of NLNG Plus volumes from 1 BCM/year to 4 BCM/year. Spanish and North American receiving facilities are the primary destinations for LNG shipments to Enron under the new agreement, the statement said. Iberdrola, which signed an MOU for 1.5 BCM/Year, will receive its shipments at the Spanish receiving terminal of Huelva. Jean-Francois Capelle, General Manager, Commercial, of Nigeria LNG Limited, said MOUs will soon be signed for the remaining volumes of LNG from these units, and that work had already started on sales and purchase agreements to firm up these contracts. These may be signed by the last quarter of the year. NLNG commenced commercial operation in October 1999 with its two-unit, 5.9 -million tons per annum Base Project. A third unit of similar design and capacity as the Base Project unit is currently under construction and is scheduled for completion in late 2002. On completion of the NLNG Plus Project, NLNG will have an overall production capacity of 17 million tons per annum of LNG and 2 million tons per annum of LPG. NLNG is a Nigerian Joint Venture company whose shareholders are the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (49%), Shell (25.6%), TotalFinaElf (15%) and Agip (10.4%). . -By Vincent Nwanma; +234-1-585-0849/775-6185; [email protected] Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 95
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Yes the guaranty does cover the ENA gas master. Also, as you may know this gty terminates on 10/1/01. Debra Perlingiere Enron North America Corp. Legal Department 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885 Houston, Texas 77002 [email protected] Phone 713-853-7658 Fax 713-646-3490
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I agree completely, have talked to the Mayors Office - Citizens' Assistance Office, the Traffic & Transportation Dept. (who gave me Ms. Dorsey's name) and have written to Ms. Dorsey. I suggest you also complain to our City Council member and the other at-large members. Since Dorsey is the Bikeway Coordinator, she won't have much incentive to do away with a designated bikeway but Council members want our votes: GABRIEL VASQUEZ [email protected] - I think he represents the Heights ANNISE D. PARKER [email protected] - I think Gordon has already written to her GORDON QUAN [email protected] ORLANDO SANCHEZ [email protected] CHRIS BELL [email protected] CARROLL G. ROBINSON [email protected] The last 5 are "at-large" members of the council. I got all of these from the City web site so I can't be sure it's a current list. Another argument for two lanes on Heights is that with only one lane, some percentage of traffic will divert itself to side streets making them less safe for residents there. And p.s. the argument that this lane is designed for use by bicycle commuters is particularly empty since the lane doesn't go anywhere - there's no connecting route at either end that I am aware of - do they expect all these hypothetical bicycle commuters to get on I 10?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
pls review. i've asked them to provide cost estimates and a list of the 25-50 key tech leaders. will let you know what i hear back. bullets are coming... ---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 01:09 PM --------------------------- "sandra" <[email protected]> on 12/11/2000 12:29:48 PM Please respond to "Sandra Yamane" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Near-Term Strategic Communications Karen: Please review the attached memo and let us know how you would like to proceed. Thanks. Sandra - Near-term, 2000-2001.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Mike, Please let me know if and how I can be of further assistance. Ricardo Michael Pearson 05/16/2001 05:00 PM To: Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: Exit Strategy for Pemex Projects Ricardo Just a note to let you know EECC successfully closed on our sale of ECH Offshore shares to Horizon Offshore today and were fully paid our outstanding loans, interest, and equity forecasted. This enables us to exit from the pipeline projects on EPC 63 and 64 as planned. Only CIGSA projects to wrap up now. Thanks again for your assistance in this matter. Mike
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2000 10:10 AM --------------------------- "Andy Katz" <[email protected]> on 02/28/2000 07:42:53 AM Please respond to "Wholesale Electric Contract Standardization Group" <[email protected]> To: "Wholesale Electric Contract Standardization Group" <[email protected]> cc: (bcc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT) Subject: Fwd: CFTC Paul Pantano clarified my earlier email about the CFTC proposal. Sorry for the confusion. Andrew S. Katz, Senior Attorney Edison Electric Institute 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Voice: 202-508-5616 Fax: 202-508-5673 e-mail: [email protected] Received: from mail02-ord.pilot.net (mail-ord-2.pilot.net [205.243.174.16]) by mail.eei.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 08:27:19 -0500 Received: from mwe.com (unknown-106-134.pilot.net [206.189.106.134] (may be forged)) by mail02-ord.pilot.net with SMTP id HAA23507 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 07:25:58 -0600 (CST) From: [email protected] Received: by mwe.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6 (890.1 7-16-1999)) id 86256893.0049C2F1 ; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 07:25:40 -0600 X-Lotus-FromDomain: MW&E To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 08:25:13 -0500 Subject: CFTC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Dear Andy: I want to clarify a misunderstanding in your email to the group. While it is correct that the CFTC proposes to regulate commodities with exhaustible and nearly inexhaustible supplies differently, it has not characterized power as having an inexhaustible supply. In fact, I would expect the CFTC to treat power as having a finite supply at any given time. This means, for example, that power derivatives traded on a multilateral transaction execution facility would not qualify for exemption from the Commodity Exchange Act under the current proposal. I think the EEI and other industry groups should consider attempting to persuade the CFTC to exempt physical and derivative power contracts from certain provisions of the CEA under the CFTC's proposal to consider exemptions on a "case-by-case basis." See, for example, the discussion of DTFs on pages 9 and 10 of the proposal. I hope this clarifies the CFTC's proposal. Regards, Paul Paul J. Pantano, Jr. McDermott, Will & Emery (202) 756-8026 ****************************************************************************** ******* This message is a PRIVATE communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. ****************************************************************************** *******
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Please see attached memo from Beth Tilney and Cindy Olson.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
very clever
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi all, Since not everyone is signed up on the class email list, I'm resending to the list used before at the beginning of the semester. Apologies to those of you who got this twice, and to those no longer taking the class. Please sign up on the class list e234-1! Thanks. Colm Lysaght Networking Solutions Division Phone 408 553 4475 Fax 408 345 8720 mailto:[email protected] - E234_WACC
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/26/2001 04:35 PM ----- Much Calif Power Price Gouging Beyond FERC's Reach -ISO Updated: Monday, June 25, 2001 06:59 PM ET Email this article to a friend! Printer-friendly version By Jason Leopold Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Federal energy regulators only have the authority to order refunds for about a third of the $9 billion California Gov. Gray Davis claims energy companies have overcharged the state in the 12 months to May 2001, documents from the state's wholesale market operator show. Of the total, $2.9 billion came from the May-September period the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has said it can't act on, and $2.8 billion from the October-May period is attributable to municipal utilities over which FERC lacks jurisdiction, according to documents from the California Independent System Operator. That leaves just $3.3 billion in alleged overcharges that FERC could potentially order refunded - far less than the $9 billion Davis seeks. Talks between generators and state officials to settle billions of dollars in unpaid bills and issues of overcharging began Monday. Curtis Wagner, the FERC administrative law judge presiding over the talks, has said California will likely see refunds from generators, but far less than the $9 billion Davis expects. Davis said Sunday California is going to Washington, D.C., "with one goal, and that is to bring back $9 billion." Nearly half that amount is attributable to municipal utilities, the ISO documents show. The ISO said the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, for example, overcharged California $75 million between May and October. David Freeman, the governor's chief energy adviser and the former general manager of the LADWP, said the agency didn't overcharge the state, but conceded it profited by selling spare power to the ISO. Davis adviser Nancy McFadden said the state needs FERC to lay the groundwork for the state to seek refunds from public utilities by ordering refunds from corporate energy suppliers. But during a conference call Sunday with reporters, McFadden and Davis press secretary Steve Maviglio couldn't explain how the governor would go about getting refunds from companies whose wholesale power prices aren't regulated by FERC. Davis testified before the U.S. Congress last week that generators overcharged the state $9 billion and that FERC should order the refunds. State Sen. Jim Brulte, R-Rancho Cucamonga, has asked for an investigation into Davis's testimony, saying the figures were based on "shaky calculations." To come up with its conclusions, the ISO compared hourly market prices received by sellers to an estimate of market prices that could have been expected under competitive market conditions. The ISO established a benchmark for what it determined was competitive - at times about $125 per megawatt-hour to $200/MWh, a fraction of actual prices in the market - based on the cost of natural gas and compliance with air-quality rules. The ISO, however, typically used the price of gas at California's northern border, according to the documents. Generators paid a higher price for the fuel in Southern California, raising the cost of making electricity. The ISO also used reports of earnings by the state's "Big Five" power suppliers during 2000 - earnings that for some quadrupled - to draw the conclusion that generators overcharged the state, according to the documents. The ISO attributed high power prices in part to the state's three largest utilities' failure to buy the power they needed in advance, leaving the grid operator to pick up the shortfall at the last minute, according to the documents. The ISO alleges the following companies overcharged the state by the listed amounts between May 2000 and February: American Electric Power Service Corp. (AEP </investments/quotes/?symbol=AEP>, news </investments/news/?symbol=AEP>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=AEP>): $22.9 million Arizona Public Service Co. (PNW </investments/quotes/?symbol=PNW>, news </investments/news/?symbol=PNW>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=PNW>): $24.6 million Aquila Power Corp. (ILA </investments/quotes/?symbol=ILA>, news </investments/news/?symbol=ILA>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=ILA>): $28 million Avista Energy Inc. (AVA </investments/quotes/?symbol=AVA>, news </investments/news/?symbol=AVA>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=AVA>): $48 million Automated Power Exchange: $16 million British Columbia Power Exchange Corp: $439 million Calpine Corp. (CPN </investments/quotes/?symbol=CPN>, news </investments/news/?symbol=CPN>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=CPN>): $236 million Constellation Power Source Inc. (CEG </investments/quotes/?symbol=CEG>, news </investments/news/?symbol=CEG>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=CEG>): $7.8 million Cargill-Alliant LLC: $1.4 million Citizens Power Sales: $557,000 Coral Power, LLC,. a unit of Shell Oil (RD </investments/quotes/?symbol=RD>, news </investments/news/?symbol=RD>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=RD>): $27 million Duke Energy Corp. (DUK </investments/quotes/?symbol=DUK>, news </investments/news/?symbol=DUK>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=DUK>): $804 million Dynegy Inc. (DYN </investments/quotes/?symbol=DYN>, news </investments/news/?symbol=DYN>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=DYN>): $530 million Enron Corp. (ENE </investments/quotes/?symbol=ENE>, news </investments/news/?symbol=ENE>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=ENE>): $39 million El Paso Corp. (EPG </investments/quotes/?symbol=EPG>, news </investments/news/?symbol=EPG>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=EPG>): $29 million El Paso Power Electric Co. (EE </investments/quotes/?symbol=EE>, news </investments/news/?symbol=EE>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=EE>): $24,475 Hafslund Energy Trading LLC: $712,528 Idaho Power (IDA </investments/quotes/?symbol=IDA>, news </investments/news/?symbol=IDA>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=IDA>): $28 million Koch Energy Trading: $2.5 million Los Angeles Department of Water and Power: $75 million MDSC: $24 million Mieco Inc.:$1.6 million Morgan Stanley Capital Group (MWD </investments/quotes/?symbol=MWD>, news </investments/news/?symbol=MWD>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=MWD>): $124,644 NewEnergy Inc.: $1.5 million Nevada Power Co. (SRP </investments/quotes/?symbol=SRP>, news </investments/news/?symbol=SRP>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=SRP>): $9.1 million PacifiCorp: $65 million PECO Energy Co. (EXC </investments/quotes/?symbol=EXC>, news </investments/news/?symbol=EXC>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=EXC>): $4.2 million Portland General Electric (ENE </investments/quotes/?symbol=ENE>, news </investments/news/?symbol=ENE>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=ENE>): $44 million Public Service Co. of Colorado: $14.1 million Public Service Co. of New Mexico (PNM </investments/quotes/?symbol=PNM>, news </investments/news/?symbol=PNM>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=PNM>): $15.5 million Puget Sound Energy: $24 million Reliant Energy Inc. (REI </investments/quotes/?symbol=REI>, news </investments/news/?symbol=REI>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=REI>) $750 million Mirant Corp. (MIR </investments/quotes/?symbol=MIR>, news </investments/news/?symbol=MIR>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=MIR>), formerly Southern Co., $753 million *Sempra Energy Trading Corp. (SRE </investments/quotes/?symbol=SRE>, news </investments/news/?symbol=SRE>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=SRE>): $82 million (this number has been wiped out by the ISO) Sierra Pacific Power Co. (SRP </investments/quotes/?symbol=SRP>, news </investments/news/?symbol=SRP>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=SRP>): $23 million TEK: $11 million Tuscon Electric Power: $1.1 million UPA: $131,715 Winston and Strawn: $11,917 Williams Cos. (WMB </investments/quotes/?symbol=WMB>, news </investments/news/?symbol=WMB>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=WMB>) $860 million Total FERC jurisdictional sellers: $4.7 billion *Total without SETC/SDG&E: $4.6 billion Total FERC and Non-FERC sellers: $6.7 billion *Total without SETC/SDG&E: $6.6 billiion Total March-May overcharges: $2.3 billion
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ENRON STOCK FUND IN THE ENRON CORP. SAVINGS AND ESOP PLANS On Friday, January 11, trading of Enron stock was suspended on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). All Savings and ESOP Plan transactions, including 401(k) payroll contributions, involving this fund were placed in a pending status until trading resumed. As announced by Enron's Office of the Chair on Wednesday, January 16, Enron stock would now be traded Over The Counter (OTC). Upon receiving this information, work began immediately to develop a process that allows for OTC trades in the plans. On Thursday, January 17, Enron initiated a process to facilitate OTC trades of Enron stock inside the 401(k) and ESOP and all pending transactions were processed using Thursday's closing price. Now that trading has resumed, we urge you to review your investment elections to ensure that they are consistent with your investment goals. As things change, we will continue to update you. Enron Benefits Department
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I'd like to get together as a group and discuss both Commodity Logic & DCAF projects and see if we can put together a joint high level vision for supporting the trade clearing functions. Here are the items I'd like to initially discuss: Commodity Logic Deliverables, timing and perhaps a demo or screen shots to show where we currently are in our development. Current DCAF requests and current areas of pain communicated from the user side. Legal & Credit concerns or issues known at this time. Once we have put together a strawman or high level plan then let's follow up with the larger user community and see if this address the highest priority concerns that were brought up at the Deal Clearing JAD session. Cheryl: Please set up an hour and a half meeting with the people addressed under cc: above to discuss the subject listed above. I'd like to meet ASAP and would be willing to buy lunch if that aids us in getting this scheduled sooner than later.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hey man, check this out. I have planned the same trip. We are actually going in on Wednesday night - the 14th. We are staying at NY,NY. We will have to hook up. Rachel Bonilla and her husband are going to be there as well that weekend. Should be fun. PL
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 1/23/02; HourAhead hour: 8; HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012308.txt Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data !!!Unknown database. Alias: dbCaps97Data Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }