text
stringlengths
1
1.59M
meta
dict
********************************************************************** The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to The eDirect Network. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe please click here. http://www.offermail.net/email/ngredir.cfm?e=1750150899&m=2111010&coid=811&a=email%[email protected] ********************************************************************** As seen on NBC, CBS, CNN, and even Oprah! Lose 7 to 16 pounds of fat while reversing the aging process without dieting or exercise! This proven discovery has been reported on by the New England Journal of Medicine. Forget about aging and dieting forever! And it's Guaranteed! Click here for a free one-month supply! http://www.offermail.net/email/ngredir.cfm?e=1072572543&m=2111010&coid=811 Would you like to lose weight while you sleep! * No dieting! * No hunger pains! * No Cravings! * No strenuous exercise! * Change your life forever! Click here for a free one-month supply! http://www.offermail.net/email/ngredir.cfm?e=1072572543&m=2111010&coid=811 1. Body Fat Loss -- 82% improvement. 2. Wrinkle Reduction -- 61% improvement. 3. Energy Level -- 84% improvement. 4. Muscle Strength -- 88% improvement. 5. Virility -- 75% improvement. 6. Emotional Stability -- 67% improvement. 7. Memory -- 62% improvement. 100% GUARANTEED! http://www.offermail.net/email/ngredir.cfm?e=1072572543&m=2111010&coid=811
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
If you are interested in ordering gift baskets for the holiday season, either personally or for that favorite customer, then you won't want to miss this. Renee Lange, owner of Baskets and More will be here Friday, November 17 at 10:30 AM in Mt. Bachelor to show off her holiday line of gift baskets. In the past we have used Renee extensively for customer appreciation baskets, the response is always positive! Feel free to stop by, see what Renee has to offer and place any orders. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mollie
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2000 04:55 PM --------------------------- Sandra Dial 04/05/2000 01:04 PM To: [email protected], [email protected], Alicia Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabrae Zajac/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Garvin Jobs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amanda Boettcher/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle Waldhauser/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: FW: Playboy Bunny Calendar for 2000 - PLAYBOY.PPS
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dale, I can reserve 2 to 2:30 time slot but there is really not much that I can tell you at this point. The commercial groups are still interested and are moving towards the test of the package. As soon as they will decide to move ahead, we (Research) shall be involved, helping to evaluate the product. As I have said, we are not the decision makers in this case. I think that we should allow simply the process to run its course. Vince "Dale M. Nesbitt" <[email protected]> on 04/30/2001 05:59:30 PM Please respond to <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> cc: Subject: RE: Get Together This Coming Tuesday? Vince: I will call tomorrow in the morning. Lunch or right after lunch would be great. How would 100 pm work for you? Dale -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:07 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Get Together This Coming Tuesday? Dale, Please, call me on Tuesday. My morning schedule is full but I am open in the afternoon. Vince "Dale M. Nesbitt" <[email protected]> on 04/30/2001 01:51:21 AM Please respond to <[email protected]> To: "Vincent Kaminski" <[email protected]>, "Kimberly S. Watson" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Get Together This Coming Tuesday? Vince/Kim: I am flying to Houston tonight and wondered if it would fit one or both of your schedules to get together this coming Tuesday sometime for 1/2 hour or so. I really want to reinitiate the conversations MarketPoint was having with John Goodpasture and you, and he said either or both of you were the right people to continue after his responsibility shift. John was quite positive about the idea of Enron acquiring MarketPoint NARG through license, and he implied that one or both of you would be carrying the ball in that direction after he handed it to you. Would this coming Tuesday morning at 930 am be a good time for you guys? If so, please give me an email shout at the above address or leave a message on my voicemail at (650)218-3069. I think you will be truly impressed with the scope and progress we have been able to make with both the short run NARG and the long run NARG in which you were interested (not to mention our power model). The progress is noticeable since you saw it. Both long and short term NARG are having quite an impact on a number of gas decisions at the moment ranging from Venezuelan LNG, North American LNG import terminals and term, gas basis calculations, trading support, power plant development, gas-to-power price spreads in key markets, veracity of heat rate trades, bank financings, storage field evaluation, and which new pipelines we can expect to see enter and which are dogs. I really hope we can fit it in and get our discussions moving in a mutually productive direction again. I think NARG can help you become even more successful, and I look forward to working with you. We have a new office address and new phone number as well. (We move in May 1.) Altos Management Partners 95 Main Street, Suite 10 Los Altos, CA 94022 (650)948-8830 voice (650)948-8850 FAX (650)218-3069 Cellular Give the phones a week or so to get "debugged" and then switch over. Dale
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Barbara, Sorry to have missed the dinner. I had to work on Sunday to prepare for my trip to London this week. I called Jeff about it and he said that he would let you know. Vince Barbara Ostdiek <[email protected]> on 03/16/2001 03:11:04 PM To: [email protected], david Ikenberry <[email protected]>, kanatas <[email protected]>, [email protected] cc: Subject: Jorion dinner Hello The dinner with Philippe Jorion is scheduled for 6:30 Sunday evening at Churrascos. Dave will bring Philippe to the restaurant. Thanks. bbo
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
too many tardies and we'll keep you after school! seriously, you're doing great, Don. Thanks for everything--including TVA/ComEd indic & trades. We changed TVA methodology to include anything sinking at the hub and moving through THAT SINKS IN SERC. Hope that works for ya; let me know if not!! you got any influence over the ERCOT guys? when the dust settles, we'd love to get their trades & indic. I hear there's cuts and outages--could we get yesterday's hourly from a check out guy or a scheduler, maybe, or Russell B.? Thanks--you da power man! Bobette Riner Director of Indexes TradersNews Energy 713/647-8690 FAX: 713/647-7552 cell: 832/428-7008 [email protected] http://www.tradersnewsenergy.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 9:46 AM Subject: EPMI IPG INDEX 2/28/01 > Enclosed, please find the IPG Index reports. > > Sorry for the tardiness. > > Thanks, > > Don Baughman > Enron Power Marketing, Inc. > > (See attached file: 02-27-01 EPMI IPG INDEX.xls)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Julie Pechersky is walking him over you can let them know when they get there. Do you want me to take you out of Kobra all together so you do not get charged for the application?? thank, -d -----Original Message----- From: Sturm, Fletcher J. Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:10 PM To: Marcinkowski, Danielle Subject: RE: Kobra If it's not too late, I don't even need a lesson at all...I'm using my discount broker live feeds. thanks, fletch -----Original Message----- From: Marcinkowski, Danielle Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:50 AM To: Sturm, Fletcher J. Subject: RE: Kobra sure, I will take care of it. -----Original Message----- From: Sturm, Fletcher J. Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:09 AM To: Marcinkowski, Danielle Subject: Kobra Danielle, Could you please tell whoever was coming to give me the Kobra lesson at 1:30 that I need to move it to 2:30? Thanks, Fletch
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Is anybody actually coming to DC for homecoming this year? ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. **********************************************************************
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Deal 706674 D Rebecca Griffin@ENRON 03/30/2001 04:12 PM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: CP&l Thanks for your help. Rebecca ---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca Griffin/NA/Enron on 03/30/2001 04:11 PM --------------------------- Janet H Wallis@ECT 03/29/2001 08:49 AM To: Rebecca Griffin/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: CP&l Please add a spot sale for Feb 21 at $5.16 for 5K. Thanks Janet
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
great, I'm glad the intro helped. He is very pro business and is excellent. Let me know if you need anything else. Jeff David Hoog 02/02/2001 02:40 PM To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: contract issues thank you. thank you. thank you. (i had an excellent discussion with haedicke and we came up with a solution to the isda problem in 1 day.)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I understand that AA may not provide the review of interim financial information that the SEC requires to be obtained in respect of Form 10-Q filings ( Article 10 of Regulation SX). Jordan asked me to give an update in an hour about the impact of this on covenants in ENE credit and other instruments requiring delivery of ENE's 10Qs. (1) I have not yet been able to ascertain whether (i) the AA review or any statement in respect thereof is required to be filed with the SEC, or (ii) if not so required, ENE would file the 10-Q without having obtained the review. (2) ENE's 364-day corporate revolver (and most other ENE instruments containing the subject covenant) requires ENE to make available either on "EDGAR" or ENE's home page on World Wide Web, or otherwise make available to the Banks promptly after the filing or sending thereof, and in any event within 75 days after the end of each of the first three fiscal quarters, a copy of ENE's report on Form 10-Q. If ENE does not file the 10-Q, it arguably could nevertheless send it to the banks as confidential information (to comply with Regulation FD) within the required time period and satisfy the covenant. The revolver contains a confidentiality provision. Failure to deliver the 10-Q constitutes an Event of Default under the revolver if the failure continues for more than 30 days after ENE has received notice thereof by the Paying Agent. I will continue to pursue information from the accountants. Regards, NJD Nora J. Dobin Senior Counsel Enron Corp. - Global Finance 1400 Smith Street, Suite 2083 Houston, Texas 77002 Phone: 713/345-7723 Fax: 713/853-9252
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000 10:27 AM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: Maria Sandoval 01/04/2000 10:07 AM To: Margo Reyna/HOU/EES@EES, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], [email protected] cc: Subject: I ASKED GOD TO BLESS YOU TODAY!! ---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000 10:06 AM --------------------------- Chantelle Villanueva 01/04/2000 09:59 AM To: Kim Perez/FGT/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: I ASKED GOD TO BLESS YOU TODAY!! ---------------------- Forwarded by Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000 09:59 AM --------------------------- From: Kim Perez@ENRON on 01/04/2000 09:11 AM To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Dreadin/GCO/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: I ASKED GOD TO BLESS YOU TODAY!! HAPPY NEW YEAR 2000! IT'S GOING TO BE A WONDERFUL YEAR! > > I asked the Lord to bless you > As I prayed for you today > To guide you and protect you > As you go along your way.... > His love is always with you > His promises are true, > And when we give Him all our cares > You know He will see us through > So when the road you're traveling on > Seems difficult at best > Just remember I'm here praying > And God will do the rest. > > Pass this to people you want God to bless, and don't forget to > send it back to the one who ask God to bless you first. >
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Scott, I shold probably clearify something. The existing right of way, which we intend on staying in, at least around Cordes Junction is located west of I-17, which will not impact the Agua Fria National Monument, which occurs on the east side of the interstate. Should we be forced to move to the east side of I-17, then the Monument may become a problem. Like you, I was taking into consideration all possible issues in the pathway of the proposed construction and also those that are in the near proximity and have the potential of becoming an "opportunity" in the event we are forced to deal with them. I appreciate your wirk in this...... "Patti, Scott" <[email protected]> on 09/25/2001 05:10:00 PM To: "'Shafer, John'" <[email protected]> cc: "'Gadd, Eric'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'Hyatt, Kevin'" <[email protected]>, "'Kilmer III, Robert'" <[email protected]>, "'Cebryk, Doug'" <[email protected]>, "Schmidt, Jon" <[email protected]>, "Alstad, Jon" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Review Draft - Sundevil Fatal Flaw Analysis/Briefing Report Gentlemen, Attached is our work to date (minus the telephone call summary sheets and permit requirement summary sheets [Appendix A] you've already received) on the Fatal Flaw Analysis/Briefing Report for Project Sundevil (or is it The Sundevil Project, or Sun Devil [2 words, rather than 1])? It truly is a working document, and can be expanded in areas as you see fit, or there may be other areas you may want us to discontinue researching. This review draft is provided for your review and input as to where you might like it expanded and where you might like effort to be discontinued. As I mentioned yesterday, I will be out of town the remainder of the week. Please contact Jon Alstad in my absence with any action items and input you may have. Thanks, Scott Scott J. Patti Senior Project Manager ENSR International 1601 Prospect Parkway Fort Collins, CO 80525 Phone: (970) 493-8878 Fax: (970) 493-0213 Email: [email protected] ********************************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential and privileged proprietary information intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, distribution, copying or disclosure of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. It is our policy that e-mails are intended for and should be used for business purposes only. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ENSR www.ensr.com [email protected] ********************************************************************** - Fatal Flaw Analysis.doc - Table 1 - Cat-Constraint.doc - Table 2.doc - sundevilschedule.ppt
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Introducing your first SAP Paycheck! This is the first payroll processed in SAP for all employees paid out of Corporate Payroll. You may notice some changes in the way information is reflected on your pay advice, the most common are itemized below. What,s Different? ? Your +home, cost center will be displayed at the top of the pay advice. This is your department number as designated in the HR and financial modules of SAP. ? Any earnings descriptions that start with a +P, represent earning types reported in the prior period. For instance, if you reported vacation time for the July 1st-15th pay period, it will be reflected on your July 31st pay advice as +PVacation,. ? Flex dollars will appear on the earnings section of the pay advice instead of as a credit in the deduction section. The various benefit deductions will remain itemized in the deduction section. ? If you transfer between Enron companies during the year, your year)to-date totals will carry forward to the new company pay advice. Previously, the year-to-date totals started over when transferred to another company. This change will provide your total Enron earnings and deduction amounts on your pay advice throughout the year. (Note that your W2 at the end of the year will reflect your earnings by company). ? For salaried employees, any reported exception time (e.g. vacation, sick day, etc.) will be reflected on the earnings section with hours only, the related dollar amount will be included in the +Salary, earnings type. ? For any other information or further explanations regarding your payroll contact the Payroll Call Center at 713-345-5555 Payroll FAQ,s My paycheck has a line called &other deductions8, what does that stand for? There is a fixed amount of lines to print deductions on the paycheck. For some employees, the number of deductions are more than we have room to print. In this circumstance, the system totals all remaining deductions and prints them on one line ) titled &other deductions8. The detail of all deductions can be viewed on the pay advice that is displayed on the intranet at eHRonline.enron.com. What do the earnings or deduction codes on my paycheck mean? These definitions are listed on the Payroll webpage located at hrweb.enron.com, select Enron Payroll from the side index. Why is my overtime not reflected on my paycheck? Overtime is paid one pay period in arrears, therefore it will be reflected in the next pay period. For example, if you reported overtime for the July 1st )15th pay period, it will be reflected on your July 31st pay advice as +POvertime,. What is the limit for Social Security (FICA)? For year 2000 the limit is $4,724.40 on a wage base of $76,200. This limit is applied to each Enron payroll tax company. Therefore, if you transfer to another Enron company these limits will start over, however, the total amount withheld across all companies will be reflected on your paystub. Excess FICA will be credited to you by the IRS via your tax return. What federal income tax rate is used for my bonus or when I exercise stock options? There is a standard federal income tax rate of 28% for these earnings. This can be higher if the employee has completed a Supplemental Tax form requesting a higher rate (this form can be found at hrweb.enron.com , select Enron Payroll from the side index).
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
are you here today brat?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Thanks. Got if fixed. [email protected] 09/22/2000 05:39 PM To: "Jeff Dasovich" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Re: your mail Greetings Jeff, Sorry for the delay in responding. I would call TJ at Haas (510) 643-0435 and have her help you get to the right person. Kindly, Salvador -- Salvador D. Aceves Assistant Professor, Accounting Director, Executive Education School of Business and Management University of San Francisco 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117 Tel (415) 422-6263 fax (415) 422-2502 e-mail: [email protected] > > > Greetings professor: > > Sorry to bother you with this. Sad to say that things were working well, but > now, for some reason, Izio won't let me in, saying that my password is not > correct (the one they sent me). When I try to have them send me a new one, I receive nothing.> > ; Is there someone I should contact to try and resolve? > > Second, I've been informed that I will be travelling on business on December > 11th, which conflicts with the final.;Is it possible to take the final the > preceding week, or on the 13th or 14th?; Apologies for any inconvenience. > > Best, > Jeff >
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dave the following are PNM's Wholesale Power Marketing's comments: 1) Please spell out "Public Service Company of New Mexico Wholesale Power Marketing throughout the Enfolio. 2) Section 2.3 should also include your customer's recording equipment and tape as well. 3) Section 4.1 (iv) ...apply to any "Party" ... should be capitalized. 4) Section 4.1 "last sentence" ...Notify Party or "its" Affiliates.... 5) Section 4.4, please include the following sentence at the end: Provided, however, that it is not the purpose of this Section 4.4 to provide for or to permit the setoff of obligations by ENRON against Counterparty for obligations of the PNM Gas Services under contracts between ENRON and the PNM Gas Services or against the PNM Gas Services for the obligations of the Counterparty under this Master Agreement. 6) Section 6.2 A. first sentence "....and (iii) such New Tax is due ..." remove comma (,) 7) Section 8.3 & 8.5, Appendix 1: Arbitration, Disputes, Procedures and Award , Texas Law is being used. Our proposal is a neutral state such as New York.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
SENT ON BEHALF OF BRUCE McMILLS EFFECTIVE JULY 27,2000: 20,000 Inlet @ HPL / Eastrans Redelivered: FCV 7,800 HPL CW 12,200 If you have any questions please call Bruce McMills at (713) 627-6467. Thanks, Chad Cass (713) 627-6202
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
and per you request of Joseph Morris, Mr. Morris' disclosure of his relationship with Mr. Beatty and Mr. Renfrew.? If I can be of further service, please let me know. Barbara Tyndall, Secretary to Michael Beatty -----Original Message----- From:?? DIANNE STEVENSON [SMTP:[email protected]] Sent:?? Monday, January 15, 2001 3:08 PM To:???? Tyndall, Barbara Subject:??????? Reply to your e-mail Attached please find Judge Morris' response to your e-mail. - 255467.WPD
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
More questions form Duke. Please respond as quickly as possible. Thanks, Don ---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 01:29 PM --------------------------- [email protected] on 10/18/2000 12:43:23 PM To: [email protected] cc: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Additional data requests on Wheatland Don, Below are additional questions and data requests regarding technical, operational, and environmental aspects of the Wheatland project. Please respond to us at your earliest convenience. Mario Hurtado Duke Energy North America Duke Energy North America Additional Data Requests Wheatland Facility 1. [Wheatland] Please provide any and all studies related to the adequacy of the plant's water supply. 2. [Wheatland] During construction and commissioning of the plant and switchyard were there any spills of oil or similar events that could have resulted in soil or groundwater contamination? Please provide details of any incidents. Have there been any incidents since the plant achieved commercial operation? Please provide details. 3. [Wheatland] It is our understanding that the switchyard will be owned by the project and maintained by Cinergy. Please provide a copy of the proposed contract with Cinergy. What indemnification will Cinergy provide the project related to environmental incidents in the switchyard? 4. [Wheatland] It is our understanding that the quality of the plant's water supply in operation differed from the level assumed during development. Please provide all reports and documentation related to water quality, including original design assumptions, testing during commissioning, and problems as a result of quality differences. 5. [Wheatland] Please provide a listing of all Enron affiliates involved in the development and operation (physical and commercial) of the facility. Such listing should include a one-sentence description of the role of the entity, whether the role is terminated or continuing, and whether a formal contract existed between the project and the entity. [N.B.: We would like to have this informaiton for Lincoln and Gleason as well.] 6. [Wheatland] Please provide a listing of all non-Enron organizations involved in the development, design, and construction of the facility who may have a continuing relationship with the project, including outstanding warranties, service contracts, as well as other rights and obligations. Indicate how the organization was engaged, role of the organization and whether there is any currently outstanding issues with the organization. 7. [Wheatland] Are there any formal contracts between West Fork Land Development Company and Lake Acquisition Company? Please provide. 8. [Wheatland] Are there any currently enforceable warranties running from the project to the EPC contractor (We understand it to be Enron Engineering & Construction.) or NEPCO as subcontractor? 9. [Wheatland] Please provide all engineering studies that discuss the structural stability or integrity of the shoreline of the "Lake". During the site visit it was observed that one shoreline on one side of the Lake had been reinforced. 10. [Wheatland] Provide any studies discussing the seismic activity in the vicinity of the Wheatland facility. 11. [Wheatland] Were transmission upgrades required of Wheatland by either Cinergy or IPL? Were transmission service credits credited to Wheatland for the upgrades? Will these credits be transferred to the Wheatland buyer? 12. [Wheatland] Have any outages of the plant's interconnection occurred as a result of high wind, blowing dust or lightning since commercial operation? If yes, how many incidents and for how long was the interconnection out of service?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Short Term Cali is short NP and long SP for HE 1-7, 23 and 24 tomorrow (03/07). Please look in ECTSTCali to check theshort amounts in PGE2 and PGE 3, length is in SCE1 and SDGE1 under ECTSTCali and EES 2. Please do the ST-Cali deals under the ST-Cali book. We will split ST-Cali profits in SP 50/50 over $150. Any EES2 sale are still $5(deals under ST-Whourly). In the North we will just buy for ST-Cali to help them cover their short (again deals under ST-Cali). IF you have any questions please call. Bill
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/04/2001 10:12 AM --------------------------- "Campbell, Carolyn" <[email protected]> on 04/03/2001 03:05:58 PM To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Keffer, John" <[email protected]> Subject: ENA/Delta Documents Second Revision 4/3/01 <<Letter Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC>> <<Guaranty by ABC for Enron Salmon LLC.DOC>> Gentlemen: We have enclosed revised drafts of the following documents; 1. Letter Agreement between ENA and PPL, marked to reflect revisions from the prior draft of today's date; and 2. Guaranty Agreement from Delta in favor of ENA, marked to reflect revisions from the prior draft of today's date. We would request that all parties confirm the accuracy of the bracketed amounts set forth in the letter agreement. If the foregoing documents are satisfactory, please advise in order that we may remove brackets, insert dates and forward clean copies for your signature. We await comments from you with respect to tax provisions in the LLC Agreement. Thank you. Carolyn M. Campbell King & Spalding 713-276-7307 (phone) 713-751-3280 (fax) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Enclosures: 133641vR11/10 137007vR4/3 Confidentiality Notice This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message. - Letter Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC - Guaranty by ABC for Enron Salmon LLC.DOC
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dear Mr. Dalia - Please do not be adding me to any more lists. Jack Heaston ----- Original Message ----- From: Dalia, Keith A - TOS-DITT1 <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:39 PM > You have been added to the RRGA-L mailing list (RTO West Congestion Model > Content Group) by Keith Dalia <[email protected]>. > > Please save this message for future reference, especially if this is the > first time you subscribe to an electronic mailing list. If you ever need > to leave the list, you will find the necessary instructions below. > Perhaps more importantly, saving a copy of this message (and of all > future subscription notices from other mailing lists) in a special mail > folder will give you instant access to the list of mailing lists that you > are subscribed to. This may prove very useful the next time you go on > vacation and need to leave the lists temporarily so as not to fill up > your mailbox while you are away! You should also save the "welcome > messages" from the list owners that you will occasionally receive after > subscribing to a new list. > > To send a message to all the people currently subscribed to the list, > just send mail to [email protected]. This is called "sending mail > to the list", because you send mail to a single address and LISTSERV > makes copies for all the people who have subscribed. This address > ([email protected]) is also called the "list address". You must > never try to send any command to that address, as it would be distributed > to all the people who have subscribed. All commands must be sent to the > "LISTSERV address", [email protected]. It is very > important to understand the difference between the two, but fortunately > it is not complicated. The LISTSERV address is like a FAX number that > connects you to a machine, whereas the list address is like a normal > voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial the > FAX number when you wanted to talk to someone on the phone, you will > quickly realize that you used the wrong number and call again. No harm > will have been done. If on the other hand you accidentally make your FAX > call someone's voice line, the person receiving the call will be > inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes. The > fact that most people will eventually connect the FAX machine to the > voice line to allow the FAX to go through and make the calls stop does > not mean that you should continue to send FAXes to the voice number. > People would just get mad at you. It works pretty much the same way with > mailing lists, with the difference that you are calling hundreds or > thousands of people at the same time, and consequently you can expect a > lot of people to get upset if you consistently send commands to the list > address. > > You may leave the list at any time by sending a "SIGNOFF RRGA-L" command > to [email protected]. You can also tell LISTSERV how you > want it to confirm the receipt of messages you send to the list. If you > do not trust the system, send a "SET RRGA-L REPRO" command and LISTSERV > will send you a copy of your own messages, so that you can see that the > message was distributed and did not get damaged on the way. After a while > you may find that this is getting annoying, especially if your mail > program does not tell you that the message is from you when it informs > you that new mail has arrived from RRGA-L. If you send a "SET RRGA-L ACK > NOREPRO" command, LISTSERV will mail you a short acknowledgement instead, > which will look different in your mailbox directory. With most mail > programs you will know immediately that this is an acknowledgement you > can read later. Finally, you can turn off acknowledgements completely > with "SET RRGA-L NOACK NOREPRO". > > Following instructions from the list owner, your subscription options > have been set to "NOFILES REPRO" rather than the usual LISTSERV defaults. > For more information about subscription options, send a "QUERY RRGA-L" > command to [email protected]. > > Contributions sent to this list are automatically archived. You can get a > list of the available archive files by sending an "INDEX RRGA-L" command > to [email protected]. You can then order these files > with a "GET RRGA-L LOGxxxx" command, or using LISTSERV's database search > facilities. Send an "INFO DATABASE" command for more information on the > latter. > > This list is available in digest form. If you wish to receive the > digested version of the postings, just issue a SET RRGA-L DIGEST command. > > Please note that it is presently possible for other people to determine > that you are signed up to the list through the use of the "REVIEW" > command, which returns the e-mail address and name of all the > subscribers. If you do not want your name to be visible, just issue a > "SET RRGA-L CONCEAL" command. > > More information on LISTSERV commands can be found in the LISTSERV > reference card, which you can retrieve by sending an "INFO REFCARD" > command to [email protected]. >
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The nomination for 4/4/2000 is: Deliveries: 45,000 MMBtu into Eastrans Redeliveries: 20,000 into PG & E at Carthage 7,800 from Fuels Cotton Valley into HPL 2,200 to HPL's Cartwheel at Carthage 15,000 into Mobil Beaumont For 4/5/2000, the nomination is as follows: Deliveries: 75,000 MMBtu into Eastrans Redeliveries: 20,000 into PG & E 7,800 from Fuels Cotton Valley into HPL 25,000 into HPL's Cartwheel at Carthage 7,200 into Mobil Beaumont at HSC - $.0375 15,000 into Mobil Beaumont at HSC - $.045 What's the status of PG & E. Can we get back up to 50,000 soon?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
thanks for checking and publishing this. I will have another talk with the guys. PL -----Original Message----- From: Fowler, Kulvinder Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:42 PM To: Ames, Chuck; Brawner, Sandra F.; Clause, Kristen; Brady, Edward; Espey, Darren; Fowler, Kulvinder; Germany, Chris; Goodell, Scott; Hodge, John; Hungerford, James; Johnson, Luchas; Keavey, Peter F.; Love, Phillip M.; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; McKinney, Hal; Mills, Bruce; Neal, Scott; Palmer, B. Scott; Pereira, Susan W.; Pimenov, Vladi; '[email protected]'; Ring, Andrea; Singla, Kimat; Taylor, Craig; Townsend, Judy; Versen, Victoria; Videtto, Melissa; Worthing, Ashley Subject: TRV Notification: (East P/L Totals - 11/27/2001) The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/27/2001>, published as of 11/27/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
This deal was in as 492562, but with no broker. I added APB. Thanks, Kate Kerri Thompson@ENRON 01/09/2001 02:26 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: apb checkout missing deal for jeff richter selling smud 175.00 10th 25 mw np-15 thanks!
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
FYI -----Original Message----- From: Henry, David Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:03 AM To: Sims, Bill Subject: Memo: Transfer of Venue.DOC Bill, Attached is my short memo on venue transfers in the Eastern District. Thanks, David ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++ The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You <<Memo: Transfer of Venue.DOC>> - Transfer of Venue.DOC
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 3/7/01; HourAhead hour: 21; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001030721.txt ###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule. Unable to assign deal number.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Molly, I think you called his bluff. If he does not fax a copy of his paycheck stub, we should not talk to him. He never talked to me about it. If he made a true statement about his compensation, he should have no reservations about sending us the confirmation. Vince Enron North America Corp. From: Molly Magee 11/27/2000 01:58 PM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Charles Shen Vince: I left you a voicemail about Charles Shen a week or so ago, but wanted to follow up with you. When I called him to extend our offer to him, he expressed surprise at the base salary offer of $110,000, and told me that he was currently earning base pay in the amount of $120,000. I told him that the salary figure he had written himself on the application was $102,000, but he insisted that he had made an error and that it should have been $120,000. I asked him what base salary he was looking for, and he said he would expect at least a 10% increase in his base. I then told him that I was not authorized to make an offer above our initial one, and would contact you and get back to him. I called him later that afternoon and asked him to fax me a copy of his last paycheck stub so that we could minimize the confusion about his base pay. He said that he would be happy to do so, but I never received the fax. He left me a voicemail message during the evening that said he was on vacation and didn't have access to the pay stubs, but would send me a copy when he returned. I have not heard from him since, and wondered if he had contacted you. If not, would you want to get together to discuss our next step? I'll wait to hear from you, Molly x34804
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Carol St. Clair EB 3889 713-853-3989 (Phone) 713-646-3393 (Fax) [email protected] ----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2001 11:59 AM ----- Carol St Clair 06/06/2001 11:50 AM To: Denise Furey/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Jay Sparling/HOU/EES@EES Subject: EEI Master Denise: Here is the EEI Master Form. Article 8 contains the collateral provisions. Call me with any questions you may have. Carol St. Clair EB 3889 713-853-3989 (Phone) 713-646-3393 (Fax) [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
maybe you would enjoy this! ---------------------- Forwarded by Larry May/Corp/Enron on 05/11/2001 10:59 AM --------------------------- From: Community Relations 05/11/2001 12:53 AM Sent by: Enron Announcements To: All Enron Houston cc: Subject: Houston Ballet's Miller Theater Performance of Coppelia Houston Ballet gives free performances of Copp,lia at Miller Outdoor Theatre in Hermann Park 8:00 p.m. Friday May 11, Saturday May 12, & Sunday May 13, 2001 sponsored by AZURIX and ENRON Considered the great comedy of classical ballet, Copp,lia tells the story of a doll so enchantingly lifelike that she mesmerizes an entire village, captures the heart of a young swain named Franz and inspires the eccentric toymaker Dr. Copp,lius to attempt to transform her into a living, breathing human being. AZURIX and ENRON are Corporate Sponsors for Houston Ballet's Miller Theatre performances, helping to present these free performances of Copp,lia to the people of Houston. Houston Ballet has a limited number of tickets for the seated area each night for employees of AZURIX and ENRON. These tickets are available on a first-come, first-served basis by calling William at 713-535-3235 no later than 5 PM today . (Please be aware that all unoccupied seats are released at 10 minutes before curtain.) Other, free, general public tickets for the seated area (max 4 per person) are available at the Miller Theatre 11:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. on the day of performance; for more information call 713-284-8351 for the Miller Theatre ticket information line. Tickets are not required for the lawn area. About Coppelia Copp,lia was first performed on May 25, 1870 at the Th,atre Imp,rial de L'Op,ra, featuring choreography by Arthur Saint-L,on and music by L,o Delibes. The work maintains a special place in the history of dance, serving as a kind of bridge from the glory of the French Romantic ballet in the early nineteenth century to the masterpieces of the Russian Imperial Theater at the turn of the century. Writing in The International Dictionary of Ballet, critic Karen Dacko analyzes the unique characteristics of the piece as follows: "Copp,lia owes its longevity to its inspired, very danceable score. But the ballet is also remarkable for its perennial appeal and for its historical significance as Romanticism's grand finale and classical ballet's prologue." Copp,lia first entered Houston Ballet' repertoire in October 1974, in a staging by Frederic Franklin (who also performed the role of Dr. Copp,lius), and featuring scenery by Peter Farmer. In November 1979, former Royal Ballet ballerina Anne Heaton re-staged the work for the company. When Houston Ballet premiered its new production of the work in March 1992 featuring breathtaking d,cor by Desmond Heeley, Carl Cunningham of The Houston Post wrote, "It would be hard to imagine anything to cap the joyous, gentle, and glorious looking new production of Copp,lia the splendidly prepared company of dancers and musicians put forth Thursday evening on Wortham Center's Brown Theater stage." (The Houston Post, March 21, 1992) Heeley's designs for Copp,lia never fail to enchant, most notably in the second-act depiction of Dr. Copp,lius's workshop. The sampling of dolls on display pay homage to the era when automatons, or mechanical toys, were the rage in Europe -- and to Heeley's inexhaustible creativity. Among the eye-popping toys featured in the workshop are a huge astrologer with a pointed hat and a robe covered in shooting stars and moons; a strongman with a handlebar mustache and barbells; Puss n Boots; an acrobat hanging from a trapeze holding the man in the moon; and a small ballerina dancing on the back of a goat. In the first act, the vibrant reds, golds, and oranges of the costumes worn by the peasants in the village conjure up a wonderfully picturesque vision of nineteenth century Bavaria.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Shah, Kal Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:55 PM To: Kitchen, Louise Subject: Full URL Importance: High Here it is. Kal http://www.enronoffline.com/default1.asp?randomid=1256
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Ron Thanks for your help with my house purchase. Please forwad an bill to me at Enron (location eb3324).
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
As we discussed, the following is proposed disclosure language regarding direct access: EnronOnline will provide users, upon request, with "T1" lines or other means of direct access to EnronOnline, as an alternative to internet access, provided that the users will be responsible for all costs associated with the establishment of direct access. Direct access connections might enable users to access EnronOnline more quickly than is currently possible through internet access. In terms of placement, I think this disclosure could initially be included on the "ticker", as we discussed. However, once users begin to establish direct connections, it should probably be included as well in the "Legal and Privacy" notices or in the ETA. We should discuss after you have had a chance to consider the language. Thanks. ---------------------------------- This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 04:16 PM --------------------------- From: Shalesh Ganjoo@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 11/07/2000 10:03 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: [email protected], Martin Lin/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Shalesh Ganjoo/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications Subject: Technical Survey Gentlemen, We are attaching below a document on Internet Protocol (IP) written by Martin. We hope you will find it informative and provide us with some feed back to improve it. Shalesh is still working on documents for fiber optics and storage. We felt that they were not complete and therefore not ready for review. We hope to have them ready for your review soon. In the mean time we would appreciate any comments you may have about the IP document. Thank you. Sincerely, Shalesh and Martin
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>> RICKY A. ARCHER Fuel Supply 700 Louisiana, Suite 2700 Houston, Texas 77002 713-830-8659 direct 713-830-8722 fax - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Maybe that commercial is closer than to the truth than I thought ...... Regards Delainey ---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 02:22 PM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: David L Fairley 05/12/2000 01:11 PM To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Emissions: Utilities Secretly Lobbied Congress; Electric Firms Gave Millions to Left and ... FYI, see article below. This is beginning to get a lot of attention. ---------------------- Forwarded by David L Fairley/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 01:09 PM --------------------------- From: Christi L Nicolay 05/11/2000 09:21 AM To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, David L Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Emissions: Utilities Secretly Lobbied Congress; Electric Firms Gave Millions to Left and ... See utilities that funded this (in bold below). ---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2000 09:19 AM --------------------------- Maureen McVicker@EES 05/11/2000 09:12 AM To: PUBLIC AFFAIRS cc: Subject: Emissions: Utilities Secretly Lobbied Congress; Electric Firms Gave Millions to Left and ... F Y I ______________________________________________________________________________ _____________ A Section Utilities Secretly Lobbied Congress; Electric Firms Gave Millions to Left and Right to Halt Deregulation John Mintz 05/11/2000 The Washington Post FINAL A01 Copyright 2000, The Washington Post Co. All Rights Reserved Some of the nation's largest electric utilities have secretly funneled millions of dollars through two front groups--one headed by well-known conservative leaders to appeal to Republicans, the other affiliated with unions--to stop Congress from deregulating their industry. The campaign, which at times was run out of the offices of the utilities' CEOs, was so secret that some Washington lobbyists for these same companies were kept in the dark about many of its activities, according to documents stamped "confidential" by the effort's organizers. The documents offer an inside view of the industry's clandestine efforts to wage its political battle through newly minted entities with innocuous-sounding names. While the use of such groups has become a common device in lobbying campaigns, it is rare to obtain a detailed operator's manual for such an effort, complete with candid assessments of individual lawmakers' vulnerabilities and specific budgets for waging grass-roots campaigns in their districts. Although the two groups--the conservative Citizens for State Power and the liberal Electric Utility Shareholders Alliance--have advertised heavily against deregulation, until now only those involved in the effort knew the organizations were the creation of the same network of utilities. This network believed using seemingly independent surrogates made their case more believable and shielded them from political risk. A 1998 memo said the utilities ran the groups in an arm's-length way described as "discreet, guarded and highly confidential. . . . Fear of congressional reprisals conditioned this style. . . . It would be prudent to avoid rash openness." Their ongoing "grass roots" lobbying campaign was designed to influence members of Congress by whipping up hometown ferment with radio ads directing listeners to call "1-800-BAD-BILL" and telephone banks wired to connect angry home district residents to congressional offices. The goal of the operation, on which the utilities spent $17 million over the last 3 1/2 years, was to bottle up legislation in a single congressional panel, the House Commerce Committee's energy and power subcommittee. The utilities' stealth campaign is one reason energy deregulation legislation has been stalled, although last fall one partial deregulation bill was reported to the full committee. Commerce Chairman Thomas J. Bliley Jr. (R-Va.) is a staunch industry critic determined to move a bill. The documents describe meetings in Washington steak houses such as Sam & Harry's where utility lobbyists and consultants shaped strategies for stopping Bliley. The dozen or so participants in the operation--who called their effort "The Project"--address each other in the memos with the kind of blunt talk that isn't often found in civics textbooks. "The trendline is ominous in that a spirit of accommodation and compromise is definitely taking hold," said one document in 1998, when the utilities feared Bliley was winning over committee colleagues. "The number one goal of 'The Project' has always been to bottleneck legislation." The participants speak of the need to "demonize" the federal agency that regulates utilities and to use debates about nuclear power as "a highly provocative wedge issue" to destabilize legislative adversaries. The memos were given to The Washington Post by deregulation advocates, and participants in "The Project" confirmed their authenticity. The effort has outraged some congressional advocates of power deregulation. Rep. Steve Largent (R-Okla.)--whom the conservative front group, Citizens for State Power, attacked in home district radio ads last year--said it is "bogus" for a group to claim the conservative mantle by protecting big utilities. "They're wearing a conservative hat, but they ought to be wearing a profit-making hat," said Largent. "The best interest of conservatives is to create competition." Citizens for State Power (CSP) is headed by two leading lights of the conservative movement--anti-tax and Republican activist Grover Norquist, and David Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union--and is run day-to-day by a veteran GOP operative, Craig Shirley. It denied for years that it took industry funds, but in recent years acknowledged taking some such money while offering no details. The Electric Utility Shareholders Alliance (EUSA) also was created by utility funds, with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers kicking in small sums. It acknowledged some of its utility backers a few years ago but uses populist language to argue that federal deregulation would cause layoffs and hurt mom-and-pop utility shareholders. The documents detail how the Washington political consultants who run "The Project" call into action one or another of these two groups depending on circumstances. They used the right-leaning CSP to broadcast ads criticizing Largent in his conservative Tulsa district and employed the more liberal EUSA to air commercials against Rep. Rick White (R-Wash.), who a year later lost his seat representing a more moderate Seattle district. In its effort to stymie federal deregulation, "The Project" at times argued both sides of an issue before different audiences. Its participants told environmentally minded legislators that various deregulation bills weren't aggressive enough in reducing utility pollution but dispatched others to argue to pro-business members that Congress should not threaten deep emissions cuts. While energy deregulation is an arcane concept to the public, it is an extraordinarily high-stakes struggle for the nation's $300 billion-a-year power industry. The battle pits investor-owned utilities against large manufacturers that want cheap power and independent power companies, such as Enron Corp., that want to compete with utilities. For one House Commerce subcommittee markup last year, lobbying firms paid temp workers to wait in line outside the hearing room for two days so the firms would have seats at the markup. Most investor-owned utilities don't want the federal government to deregulate their businesses and introduce competition. These utilities say that if need be, they prefer that state legislatures and state utilities commissions do the job because they are less heavy-handed than federal officials. So far 26 states have taken the step. Deregulation advocates say that the state efforts result in a confusing regulatory checkerboard and that federal action would lower energy prices and encourage investment in clean energy sources. Many top GOP leaders were eager to deregulate utilities when they took over Congress in 1995, seeing it as a test of a bedrock conservative principle: opening the marketplace to competition. Within months, a group of utilities sprang into action, organized by a law firm with a thriving utility practice. The firm, which now goes by the name Ryan, Phillips, Utrecht & MacKinnon, enlisted several existing clients and, later, numerous other firms. Soon, the firm had brought in nine utilities that paid from $300,000 to $700,000 a year to fund "The Project" during the years they participated. The main corporate participants, the documents said, were Carolina Power & Light, Florida Power & Light, Texas Utilities, Illinois-based Commonwealth Edison, Reliant Energy (formerly called Houston Industries), Ohio-based First Energy, Michigan-based Consumers Energy, Florida-based TECO and Union Electric Co. in Missouri. "The Project" was run by law firm partner Jeffrey MacKinnon, a former top aide to Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.), chairman of the House subcommittee; and Tim Ridley, a former Democratic staff member in Congress who now runs a firm specializing in "grass roots" lobbying campaigns. They and the utilities ran the two front groups and supervised more than 50 "mobilizations" in congressional districts, in which radio aids were aired. Banks of trained telephone operators arranged for home district residents to send telegrams or place calls to congressional offices. The groups also arranged for influential citizens in the members' home towns to spread their message--including the car dealers who sold members their cars. While most of the ads were not particularly negative, others used sarcasm or debatable statistics to attack their targets. The one broadcast against Largent said he was favoring "Boston, bureaucrats and biomass" because the House member had joined with Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) on a measure that industry officials said could have required utilities to use alternative energy sources. A memo from late 1998, six months before the campaign, gave a taste of the utilities' displeasure with him, describing the firms as "highly alarmed by Largent's obtuseness" and noting they "could make Largent's life very uncomfortable." Some congressional Republicans hold Citizens for State Power partially responsible for defeating White, who lost his swing seat to a Democrat, Jay Inslee. A year before the November 1998 election, the group aired an ad saying White wanted to raise utility rates by 35 percent, and it also circulated a poll and memo among political professionals showing that White would be beaten easily, in part because of his embrace of deregulation. "For the first time in this debate there were palpable political consequences for appearing to support" deregulation, a June 1998 document said. "In the case of Rick White, those consequences were direct and career threatening." White said he doubted the ads played much role in his defeat, but he recalls his unease at realizing a GOP group was targeting him. "I was a loyal member of the Republican cause, and this was a case of shooting a friend in the foot," he said. http://www.washingtonpost.com Folder Name: Emissions Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 78 ______________________________________________________________________ To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.) ______________________________________________________________________ Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi Gregg, I'm back. I don't know what the deal was with my cell phone this week. Perhaps the problem was the weak signal in the area. Several people commented that they had problems reaching me, and my phone was on almost the entire time. In fact, I made many calls, but I ususally checked to see if I had a signal first. Sorry for the inconvenience. I'll take a look at the DASH, etc, and get up to speed so that I can speak intelligently. Kay
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Tenn Transport k#29667, MDQ = 35,000 Demand $374,500.00 Comm $.0092 (ACA = $.0022, GRI = $.0070) Fuel = 1.31% Iroq Transport k#125008, MDQ = 35,465 Demand $294,554.56 Comm $.0057 (ACA = $.0022, Comm = $.0028, Deferred Asset Surcharge = $.0007) Fuel = see below. Notes: Iroq fuel changes each month. It ranges between 0 to .5%. All of the Iroq charges are normal section 284 tariff rates.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Mark, If Platts is licensing their information for use in the eNymex platform, does that change the legal picture with regard to EnronOnline's use of Platts (or any other) indices for settling our transactions? Do we have any exposure here? Dave ---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 10:26 AM --------------------------- From: Tana Jones@ECT on 11/13/2000 09:37 AM To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: (00-389) New York Mercantile Exchange to Base Certain enymex Contracts on Platts Benchmarks NYMEX is trying to get more competitive... ----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 09:36 AM ----- [email protected] 11/13/2000 08:53 AM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: (00-389) New York Mercantile Exchange to Base Certain enymex Contracts on Platts Benchmarks November 13, 2000 Notice to Member No. 389 New York Mercantile Exchange to Base Certain enymex Contracts on Platts Benchmarks The New York Mercantile Exchange and Platts, the world's premier energy market information service, have signed a letter of intent for Platts pricing benchmarks to be used in enymex contracts for crude oil, refined oil products, natural gas, electricity, and metals. Platts, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies (NYSE: MHP), will also provide enymex with real-time news and market commentary. The Exchange will license Platts, price assessments and benchmarks as a basis for commodities contracts traded on enymex, an internet-based platform for trading and clearing forward contracts for physical commodities. The system is scheduled for launch during the second quarter of 2001. "Every day, more than $10 billion worth of energy commerce is based on Platts' exclusive and authoritative price assessments," said Harry Sachinis, president of Platts. "With this agreement, Platts will extend its leadership to the emerging world of energy e-commerce. It is significant that the world, s largest energy exchange, the New York Mercantile Exchange, has chosen to base its enymex contracts on Platts benchmarks." Exchange Chairman Daniel Rappaport said, "We are proud that enymex will have standing behind it the two biggest names in providing price transparency to the energy and metals industries. This agreement brings us one step closer to the Exchange,s goal of extending the same leadership and credibility to a B2B marketplace as we have so successfully offered these industries through our bricks-and-mortar business. Most importantly, it will enable us to offer clearing services and an open marketplace for popular over-the-counter products." Platts is the world's largest and most authoritative provider of energy market information, with more than 325 professionals worldwide and products ranging from real-time and Internet-based news services, to market reports, databases, magazines and conferences. The company is also a leading provider of news, pricing and analysis on the global metals market. Additional information is available at www.platts.com and www.plattsmetals.com. Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies is a global information services provider meeting worldwide needs in the financial services, education and business information markets through leading brands such as Standard & Poor, s, BusinessWeek and McGraw-Hill Education. The corporation has more than 400 offices in 32 countries. Sales in 1999 were $4.0 billion. Additional information is available at www.mcgraw-hill.com. __________________________________________________ Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this email. " http://208.206.41.61/email/[email protected]&refdoc =(00-389)" Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy the text between the quotes, open your internet browser, paste it into the web site address and press Return.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000 03:01 PM --------------------------- From: Garrett Tripp 03/09/2000 02:51 PM To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: RPU The following pricing has been completed for RPU LM6000 deal. The price for the 6/1/01-9/30/06 term. $4.01kw-mo Spread Option Value Plus $1.67kw-mo Capacity for a Total Price of $5.68 Assumptions: 47 MW year one, 25 MW year two through six at MAPP (curve) ISO Heat rate 10,200 Max run hours 1400 Summer only deal VOM $3.02 NG at NNG Ventura with 0.10 summer adder 7x16 product 97% Availability Factor Yrly Price without capacity
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
we should distribute our comprehensive proposal to this group.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
[email protected] Angela D. Davis Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith, Suite 3842 Houston, Texas 77002 Tele. (713) 345-8347 Fax: (713) 646-3393 e-mail: [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I am resending this because many of you have noted to me that you never received it.? It appears we are still having difficulty transmitting from LA.?? I am asking Glen Sullivan, once he receives this, to re-forward it to you.? He is on a system that is working. -----Original Message----- From:?? Cherry, Brian - TPBKC Sent:?? Friday, May 05, 2000 8:05 AM To:???? Cherry, Brian - TPBKC; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Beamish, Richard - TPRMB; Betonte, Robert - TP2RSB; Brill, Thomas R.; Cotton, Gary; Davis, Robert E.; Davis, Steven D.; Fair, Pam; Follett, B. David - TPDBF; Fong, Ed; Freeman, Kimberly; Gaines, Mark - TPMFG; Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH; Hay, James E.; Hubbard, Lisa J.; Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; McVay, Nancy W - TPNWM; Morrow, Rick - TP3RMM; Purves, Ralph A.; Reed, William; Sakarias, Wayne P.; Schavrien, Lee; Smith, Anne S. -? TPASS; Sullivan, Glen J.; Surak, Thomas M. - TP1TMS; Suwara, J.- TPJUS; Takemura, Earl - TPEKT; Teeter, James S.; Van Lierop, Jan - TP2JXV; Watson, Steven - TP2SAW; Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW; Barker, David - TPDTB; 'How-Downing, Lindsey'; 'Jun, Christine'; 'Gileau, Pat'; 'Khoury, Dexter'; '[email protected]' Subject:??????? e-mail Alert and Testimony Finalization As a result of the ILOVEYOU virus that was sent out yesterday, e-mail traffic from and to SoCalGas, SDG&E and the Sempra Companies was interfered with and was not received.? If there were substantive changes requested for Lad or Eric's testimony, then please let me know ASAP.? I believe we are now able to receive and send e-mail. After reviewing ALJ Biren's order, we need to pre-mark our exhibits.? TURN and SCGC will be marking their testimony and exhibits as 100-999.? The Comprehensive Settlement parties will be marking their exhibits beginning from 1-99.? Here's my suggestion on how the exhibits should be marked: Exhibit 1?? Comprehensive Settlement Document?? Exhibit 2?? Lad Lorenz Testimony Exhibit 3?? Eric Nelson Testimony Exhibit 4?? Mark Pocta Testimony Exhibit 5?? Tom Beach Testimony Exhibit 6?? Jeff Dasovich Testimony Exhibit 7?? Rick Counihan Testimony Exhibit 8?? John Burkholder Testimony Exhibit 9?? Paul Amirault Testimony Exhibit 10 Jeanne Zaiontz Testimony Exhibit 11? Paul McKelvey Testimony I hope I haven't left anyone out.? If we can agree on the exhibit designation, mark the testimony in the upper right hand section of the front page of the testimony.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Colleen What is XML? Thanks Hunter
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Our January electronic report is attached. Have a good Easter! - Jan01.xls
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
8/2-8/8 $239/night ritz carlton st thomas confirm #82744876
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Give me a copy of the invoice. thanks ---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 08:05 AM --------------------------- Brenda H Fletcher 10/18/2000 08:01 AM To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: VGS We do get invoiced by VGS. The Transport contract numbers are VGS01026-IT and VGS01033 - FTS-2 Enron North America Corp. From: Victor Lamadrid 10/17/2000 05:26 PM To: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: VGS Brenda, VGS is all buy/sells for us. VGS delivers directly into Koch, CGULF and TETCO. We sell at the point or deliver into those 3 pipes where we pick up on transport. FTS-2 and IT sounds like Columbia Gulf..Thanks ---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 05:18 PM --------------------------- Brenda H Fletcher 10/17/2000 02:22 PM To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: VGS Nothing is getting flashed on VGS for commodity. We are paying commodity charges on a FTS-2 and an IT contract. Can you get rates on the usage tickets for these contracts? Thanks, Brenda
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Troy, Please review the attached to see if it conforms with your agreement. If it does, please forward it to National. Call me if you have any further questions.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
he went home already. we went to dinner mon & tues. i am just going to chill this week and party on saturday, maybe even friday a little. are you going out tomorrow?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached is a model I put together to come up with indicative valuations on costless collars. Please take a look at it, and let me know if it is helpful to you, what you would change, etc. Phil
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dad, What is the rule for guests on the weekend? Chris
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sally As discussed Beth / Brent You may be interested in how the original idea has moved on - progress ?! Mike ---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 04/04/2001 16:16 --------------------------- Steve Whitaker 30/03/2001 12:33 To: Diccon Vokins/EU/Enron@Enron, Stephen Lally/EU/Enron@Enron, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Anna McAndrew/EU/Enron@Enron, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Raewyn Perkins/LON/ECT@ECT, Rod Sayers/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Bromley/EU/Enron@Enron, Melissa Allen/LON/ECT@ECT, Buddy Aiken/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, James Sandt/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Hutton/EU/Enron@Enron, Graham Dunbar/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Phil Yoxall/LON/ECT@ECT, James New/LON/ECT@ECT, ECT London Strategic Initiatives Subject: EnVision Meeting Structures and Way Forwards At the last EnVision Project meeting the following presentation was given and agreed in principal as the way we will take things forwards. Whilst the names within each area have to be confirmed and agreed I thought that it would be useful to circulate this as many of you will be impacted. I will be communicating this further over the next few days, but if you have any immediate questions please feel free to contact me. Regards Steve (35266)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The attachment summarizes all of the comments filed by other parties in this proceeding. They're now in alphabetical order by the party filing, and the ones that I added since last night are highlighted. Let me know if you'd like a copy of any of them.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Teams: Effective July 1, 2001 With the event of having to put a reason in TMS for timeline extensions and all reliability calls going to the HotTap Help Desk and being logged into Remedy, Customer Service Representatives will no longer be required to fill out the Waiver Log. Yes it is true, we can report on the timeline extensions from TMS, Remedy will be used for the Reliability reporting so we can do away with another manual process. Please make sure all reliability calls go through the HotTap Help Desk so they may be logged into Remedy by the Help Desk and used for reliability reporting! Put as informative of statement in TMS as you can for timeline extensions, some have been a little brief. In your statement let us know if the timeline is extended due to TMS system problems, waiting for El Paso confirmations, Customers are experiencing problems in their system, Contracts group requested an extension for a new contract and so on. This will be our official documentation for timeline waivers in case of an audit. If you need more examples please let me know and I will provide them to you. If you have any questions please give me a call 37429 John Buchanan
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 11; No ancillary schedules awarded. Variances detected. Variances detected in SC Trades schedule. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001042011.txt ---- SC Trades Schedule ---- $$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange. Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred: -800.00 / Final: -799.97) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: EPMI MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01 TRADING_SC: DETM PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15 SCHED_TYPE: ENGY PURCH_SALE: 1 DEAL_NO: 1
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Canadian Gas Market: Canadian Outlook 2001 - CERA Conference Call Playback Title: Canadian Gas Market: Canadian Outlook 2001 URL(s): http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2665; *********************************************************************** In a September 13, 2001 CERA Conference Call and Web Presentation, Ed Small and Jen Snyder discussed: * Western Growth: 2001/2002 * Supply Drivers: Ladyfern, drilling levels, exploratory activity * Storage Situation: impact on the winter * Canadian Markets and Exports: domestic demand and export projections * Price Outlook: AECO, Sumas, Dawn Please follow the above URL to view and listen to a replay of this CERA Conference Call Playback. When the Premiere Conferencing PlaceWare window opens, simply enter your name and click the "View" button. A "recording key code" is not required. Hosted by Premiere Conferencing **end** E-mail Category: Conference Call Playback CERA Knowledge Area(s): North American Gas *********************************************************************** *********************************************************************** CERA's Autumn 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas are now available at http://www20.cera.com/event *********************************************************************** To make changes to your cera.com profile go to: http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount Forgot your username and password? Go to: http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos Questions/Comments: [email protected] Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sam: I think you were going to speak with me about this one - Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
does this mean that you are a seller at 70% of the number you put in your retail column?? If so.... i will take PJ Fluer Dom La Grande Dame the cristal looks a little pricey @ 200, but @ 140 i'll take that too. John Arnold 01/22/2001 09:37 PM To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Gentlemen: The following champagne is available at 70% of approximate retail price. Also have interest in trading for red wine. Retail prices derived from Spec's website or Winesearcer.com. Wine has been stored at temperature controlled private wine storage facility. Quan Vintage Wine Retail 3 1990 Perrier Jouet Brut Fleur de Champagne 110 1 1988 Piper Heidsek Reserve 65 2 1990 Dom Perignon 125 1 1990 Veuve Cliquot Ponsardin La Grande Dame 100 1 1988 Taittenger Millesine Brut 85 1 1992 Jacquart Millesine 29 3 1990 Roederer Cristal 200 Any interest??
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
the girl i was going to talk to in this group is out today. i will talk to her. she is always asking me if i know any analyst who need work. i am gonna be a rock star sat night.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000 03:54 PM --------------------------- "Mancino, Joseph (NY Int)" <[email protected]> on 11/09/2000 08:32:32 AM To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: ACCESS Trades for 11/09/00 Here are the trades executed on ACCESS last night: S 50 Z 5350 S 50 Z 5335 B 9 Z 5330 B 2 Z 5320 B 4 Z 5322 B 6 Z 5323 B 5 Z 5345 B 10 Z 5355 B 3 Z 5355 B 5 Z 5358 B 100 Z 5323 S 100 F 5369 Joseph Mancino E.D. & F. Man International (212)566-9700
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hill, Yes, I think it can be done. I am in London right now and I shall come back next week Thursday. Please, give me call about it. Vince Vincent Kaminski Managing Director - Research Enron Corp. 1400 Smith Street Room EB1962 Houston, TX 77002-7361 Phone: (713) 853 3848 (713) 410 5396 (cell) Fax : (713) 646 2503 E-mail: [email protected] Hill Huntington <[email protected]> on 03/22/2001 04:47:33 PM To: vince kaminsky <[email protected]> cc: Subject: RTP conference Vince, Sounds like there are several Enron people very interested in our seminar. Many thanks for passing the idea around. Do you think that these groups might provide some sponsorship? I didn't know whether you have already asked them and they are thinking about it or whether I need to approach them directly. I would appreciate any suggestions you have. Regards, Hill ******************************************************************* Hillard G. Huntington EMF - an international forum on energy and environmental markets Voice: (650) 723-1050 408 Terman Center Fax: (650) 725-5362 Stanford University Email: [email protected] Stanford, CA 94305-4026 EMF Website: http://www.stanford.edu/group/EMF/
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
You folks giving this to the press? Might be useful. -----Original Message----- From: Dorothy Rothrock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:13 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff Subject: [Fwd: Final letter to Loretta Lynch] took awhile..... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Final letter to Loretta Lynch Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:45:32 -0800 From: [email protected] To: [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],Derek Naten <[email protected]>,'Dominic DiMare' <[email protected]>,"Barbara R. Barkovich (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,"Keith McCrea (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,"Dan L Carroll (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected] CC: [email protected],[email protected],[email protected] Attached is a final version of the letter faxed today to Loretta Lynch. Please call or write if you'd like a faxed copy with the signatures. (And lemme know your fax number.) If this letter needs to be distributed to some service list, I will assume an attorney-at-law will perform that duty. (See attached file: Response to Angelides, 10.24.01,LK rev 2.doc)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Gerald, Upon your review please forward any comments to me and Mike Smith. After meeting with Mark Knippa this morning, we are targeting tomorrow morning (12/7/00) for execution of the master agreement. In addition to the Master, I will forward you the TA as it relates to the Blackwater deal later today. EES plans to present executable pricing for Blackwater as early as tomorrow afternoon. Thanks Bo ---------------------- Forwarded by Bo Barnwell/HOU/EES on 12/06/2000 12:09 PM --------------------------- Enron Energy Services From: Mike D Smith 12/06/2000 10:37 AM To: Bo Barnwell/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Dave S Laipple/DUB/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: ECS Here is a clean (12-4) and a new redline against the ECS version 12-1. If you approve, you can send to ECS.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dear Dr. Kaminski Thanks for your arrangement. I have received email from Shirley. Either Wednesday or Thursday will be fine to me. I am looking forward to talking to you at that time. It is always my pleasure to work with you. Best Wishes Quentin Kerr --------------------------------- Quentin Kerr, email: [email protected] Room: 67-625 Tel: (07)33461428 Department of Mathematics, The University of Queensland
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dear Dr. Kaminski here is an email invitation for teh SIAM event. A hard copy will follow Dr. V. Kaminski Enron P.O. Box 1188 Houston, Texas 77251-1188 Dear Dr. Kaminski March 12, 2001 I am writing to formalize your invitation to attend, participate, and speak in the SIAM Southwest Regional Mathematics in Industry Workshop. A time span of thirty minutes is being allotted to invited talks with an additional ten minutes or so for discussion. The workshop, funded under the auspices of a National Science Foundation grant to SIAM will not be a standard applied mathematics event with representatives from industry, academe, and governmental agencies presenting their latest research results. Instead the meeting will emphasize the mathematics and technology currently applied to the projects of industry and governmental laboratories. Additionally the event will focus upon the mechanisms facilitating interaction and collaboration between the academy, industry, and government laboratories. The workshop will be held at the University of Houston Hilton Hotel, April 27-28. Funds will be available to support both travel expenses and the cost of food and lodging of invited speakers. We will be happy to make travel arrangements on this end if so desired. We hope that you can accept our invitation. If this is the case please furnish us with a title, a short abstract, and a list of the necessary equipment for your presentation. We look forward to seeing you at the University of Houston. Sincerely W. Fitzgibbon
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
CALENDAR ENTRY: REMINDER Description: Stacey out at 2:30! Date: 6/27/2001 Time: 2:30 PM (Central Standard Time) Chairperson: Stacey W White Detailed Description:
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Argentina
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Save the date! October 22-24 has been reserved for the Enron-wide Operations Controller Forum to be held in Houston at the Warwick Hotel. To accommodate the desired travel schedule of our attendees outside the Houston office, the forum will kick-off the evening of Sunday, October 22. We will have a full day and evening on Monday, October 23, and the forum will conclude mid-afternoon on Tuesday, October 24. Many key Enron players will join us for portions of the forum. Speakers confirmed to date are Jeff Skilling, Rick Causey, Ted Murphy and Bill Bradford. Details will follow in the next few days. All hotel accommodations will be arranged by Patti and charges for these will be absorbed by my cost center. Please make your own airline reservations. I look forward to seeing you at the forum. This will be a unique opportunity to get know your counterparts from the wholesale, retail, and broadband segments of Enron, with contingents from the U.S., Canada, England, Australia, and Japan. Sally
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
This should be the final (or at least almost final) version. The amounts are correct.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Just a reminder to you basketball freaks! http://www.sportingnews.com/voices/tom_dienhart/20010312.html
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
This volume should be allocated to deal 138642 for Jan. The meter has always been on the ticket, but with zero volume. D Clem Cernosek 12/21/2000 10:18 AM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: HPL Meter #986631TEXOMA-TEJAS HPL I/C Daren: During the period of 1/1/2000 to 1/4/2000, the above meter has recorded flow on the following days with no deals attached: Days Mmbtus 1/1/00 3,737 1/2/00 3,713 1/3/00 3,730 1/4/00 800 11,980 Deal #120891 was at that meter during 12/99 production month, but it expired on 12/31/99. Currently, these volumes are being booked under the HPL Strangers Gas Contract. Logistics needs either (1) have Deal #120891 extended, (2) new deal, or (3) approval to writeoff these volumes to Unaccounted for Gas. (Please print, sign, and return original to Clem Cernosek). __________________________________________________________ Deal/Deal Ticket#/Customer (Seller/Buyer) OR ______________________________________________________ Approval to Writeoff the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss Thanks, Clem
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
E236, the derivatives...
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
_______________________________________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _______________________________________________________________ The following discusses the regulatory issues raised at our June 14 meeting with Peoples. 1. Expanded termination right for unacceptable "Regulatory Approval". As discussed prior to the meeting, language of Sects. 1.1, 1.11, 10.2 and 15.1(f) was changed to provide a termination right in the event that an unacceptable regulatory order is issued after initial approval of the Agency Agreement, but during its term. Peoples explained at the meeting their view that a termination right should exist in the event of an adverse rate order (e.g., Illinois Commission order imputing what Peoples believes to be an unreasonably high level of Hub revenue and, therefore, unaccpetably lowering retail gas rates) or FERC determination that, based on Hub operations, Peoples is in jeopardy of losing its status as a Hinshaw pipeline. These were examples of the types of orders Peoples has in mind. As proposed in our draft, either party would have a termination right in the event that the Agency Agreement is not initially approved by the ICC on acceptable terms. Under our approach, however, the parties would have to live with ;later adverse regulatory orders unless an order had the effect of revoking the Hub's operating authority. My view is that we could reasonably agree to a termination right (similar to Sect. 11.1 (vi) and (vii) of the LLC Agreement) which grants a termination right, "in the event that a Jugment determines that, as a result of Hub Transactions, Peoples is subject to comprehensive rate regulation as a natural gas company or public utility by the FERC; or loses its status as an exempt Hinshaw pipeline under Section 1(c) of the Natural Gas Act." I would suggest that we otherwise stay with our original language re regulatory approvals. Once Peoples obtains an order from the ICC which both parties accept, Peoples should be willing to assume the risk (which,in my opinion is minimal) that an adverse rate decision would cause it to wish to terminate the Agency Agreement. (David suggested at the meeting that, as another option, we could agree to a termination right due to an adverse regulatory order if Peoples chooses to discontinue all Hub Transactions, but I am not sure that we need to offer this at this stage.) The word "required" should be restored to Definitions 1.1 and 1.11. 2. Extended Hub Services. Peoples agreed at the meeting that there should be compensation after termination of the Agreement for an extended Hub Service presented during the Agreement's term. To make this clear,the words "during the term of this Agreement" should be deleted from Sect. 7.1(ii). The deleted wording of 7.2 should be restored, and to that Section we could add a sentence: "The right to compensation established under Section 7.2 (ii) for an Extended Hub Service shall survive the termination of this Agreement." Also, in Section 15.4, I believe the reference to Sect. 3.3 should be to 7.2. 3. "Hub Services"-Sect. 1.17. Based on discussion at the meeting, I understand that there is a need to address the "two county rule" in the Agreement. In connection with this, there was discussion of the need to change the description of the Hub Services to make clear that the services are incidental to the primary uses of the Hub Facilities. As I understand it, the description of the services both for the Agreement and the GTC may be changed to replace the existing references to transportation services a reference to "wheeling" serivces. This should be addressed when the revised terms of the GTC are available. I believe the business people also are discussing a procedure for approval of transactions to ensure compliance with the two county rule, and are preparing a list of types of transactions which will be pre=approved. 4. Adjustment of Administrative fee for refunds. Our position, as discussed at the meeting, is that Sect. 7.3 which provides for retroactive adjustment of the administrative fee in the event of a refund should be deleted. In support, we point out that MEH relies on a specific fee value in seeking out transactions and the fee shouldn't change after-the-fact as the result of a refund. Peoples argues that a revenue-based fee should be adjusted if there is a change in the realized level of revenue. This was left as an open point. Peoples acknowledged at the meeting that the proposed fee adjustment would occur only due to a rate refund. This means that the administrative fee could be adjusted retroactively only if a transaction occurs under a newly proposed rate which is part of the Operating Statement, but subject to refund at a level higher than the previously approved rate but lower than the maximum price under the new rate. The only portion of the fee which is at risk is the portion produced by use of a rate above the previously approved level. If, for example, a 10% increase is proposed and made effective subject to refund. A risk arises only if the negotiated price is at 90% of the maximum or above. If it is, the refund risk to MEH is its percentage of the revenue produced by the rate above the 90%above. If the rate is 95% of the maximum, the amount at risk is 5% of MEH's 20% portion of the revenue, or 1% of the fee. A refund at this level would occur in the example only if FERC approves no rate increase and requires a refund of all subject to refund revenue. If FERC approves all or part of the increase, the refund risk is reduced. Therefore, the decision should not greatly effect the economics of the deal. If we decide to allow some adjustment of the fee for refunds, the language should make clear that we are including only "refunds related to a finding by FERC that a rate in effect subject to refund is excessive and should be reduced." 5. Also with respect to refunds (required for any cause), Peoples agreed at the meeting to provide the necessary funds. We could adjust the language of Sect. 3.3 to read: "Peoples will pay to MEH all funds necessary to effect such refunds on or before the earlier of : (i) the date prescribed by a Law or Judgment for payment of such refunds; or (ii) ten (10) business days after receiving written notice of the need for such payment." (Note: Because refunds are required by FERC Order, Peoples would always know when the refund has to be paid.) 6. Admin. Fee. After the business discussion of intended coverage of the monthly fixed fee, we should reconsider the deleted language in 18.3 regarding reimbursement of costs incurred by MEH on Peoples' behalf. 7. Nomination and Scheduling on Pipelines. Sect. 2.5. Peoples proposes to delete the language we added which requires Peoples to make any necessary nominating or scheduling changes on interstate pipelines for receipt and delivery of gas at its city gate for its own account in order to effectuate Hub transactions. The language went on to also require Peoples to arrange for delivery of gas at a secondary delivery point by Displacement Delivery. At the meeting, Peoples took the position that it is already required to handle nominations and scheduling on pipelines by terms of the GTC. Peoples also indicated that, due to the nature of the Hub Facilities and transactions, the Delivery Points must be on Peoples' system and that Displacement Delivery to a point which Peoples can access under one of its pipeline agreements is not feasible for a Hub Serivce. (Note: In the Northern Illinois Gas Hub Agreement, the utility agreed to the provision we proposed.) With regard to the second part of our proposed sentence re delivery by displacement at a secondary point off-system, I agree that the GTC seems to contemplate delivery on Peoples system for the various types of transactions covered. Perhaps we can delete section "(b)" of our proposed sentence. I would like to know whether the business people have comments on this. With regard to the part (a) (the requirement that Peoples make nominanting and scheduling changes needed to effectuate Hub transactions), however, I do not find any language in the GTC which makes clear that this is Peoples' responsibility. Also, at our preliminary meeting, Laura indicated that this was an important provision to restore. (I believe Laura mentioned only part a, but need to check this.) Therefore, I believe we should propose, at least, to restore the sentence through part a, subject to verification with Laura and Gregg. 8. Grounds to Refuse Trransaction. Also, in 2.5, Peoples included as one of the grounds to refuse a Hub Service presented by MEH, a conclusion by Peoples that "Hub Capacity is deemed unavailable by Peoples due to the service requirements of Peoples' utility customers." We pointed out at the meeting that the GTC (Sect. 8) specifies all circumstances when a Hub Serivce can be refused and that this provision is not one of the specified situations. Once a firm transaction is established under the GTC, it has equal scheduling priority with other firm interstate and intrastate firm transactions. Peopels agreed that this item (Item 3) can be deleted. I believe Peoples wishes to revise (1) to read: " permitted by the terms of the GT&C, or required by any Law and Judment:. 9. Sect. 3.5. Peoples proposes to delete our proposed Section 3.5 which requires Peoples to use its best efforts to minimize imbalances experienced by Hub Shippers through use of management services offered under pipeline tariffs. Such services should be offered soon under Order 637 compliance filings. This provision was inserted as part of a paragraph in Peoples' initial draft which would have required MEH to compensate Peoples for imbalances experienced on pieplines as a result of Hub Transactions. Peoples had taken this provision from the NIGAS Hub agreement. In response, we had included the wording of 3.5 to, at least, require best efforts to minimize imbalances on the pipelines. Peoples now proposes to delete all of this on the ground that imbalances on the pipelines are the responsibility of the Hub Shippers, and not of Peoples or MEH. The GTC has provisions covering the responsibility of shippers to address imbalances on the Hub Facilities, and Peoples points to the Parking and Loaning Service for Shippers to address imbalances. In reviewin g this, I believe Peoples is right. Because the language requiring MEH to address imbalnaces on the pieplines has been deleted, I think we can delete the language of 3.5 requiring Peoples to use best efforts to minimize those imbalances. 10. Sect. 2.2 Responsibility for regulatory compliance. Peoples proposed changes to the language we inserted in 2.2 in the second sentence from the end which indicated that Peoples is responsible for compliance with the GTC. Peoples proposed that each party be responsible. At the meeting, we explained that this language was included to recognize FERC precedent requiring that, in circumstances such as this, the agreement must identify the party responsible for regulatory complaince and that party must be the certificate holder. Peoples agreed at the meeting that our original language for this sentence should be restored. 11. The Agreement (6.1) presently provides that Peoples, in its sole discretion, may propose changes in the GTC. David indicated at the meeting that, at a minimum, MEH should be advised of changes in advance and provided with an opportunity for comments before such changes are proposed. Peoples agreed to include such a provision. Also, Peoples agreed that Section 5.1 should include a representation that Peoples has provided MEH with a current copy of the presently effective GT&C. 12. Section 1.13. GTC. Peoples agreed at the meeting that the definition of GT&C should be changed to end after the words "from time to time". (This eliminates the refernce to modification in Peoples' sole discretion.) 13. Section 1.22 and 1.26. Peoples agreed that the definitions should refer only to MEH and Peoples (and not to "controlled" persons) 14. Section 1.15. Peoples agreed that the definition of Hub Capacity could be changed to eliminate the reference to determination by Peoples in its sole discretion. The determination should be "in accordance with the GT&C." Peoples suggested that a standard of "good faith" or "commercially reasonable" would be acceptable. 15. Section 5.1. Peoples agreed at the meeting that Section 5.1 could be revised to eliminate the refernce to Laws and Judgments with a materially adverse effect. Peoples agrees that there should be a representation that the Agreement does n ot violate "any Judgment or Law applicable to it",as originally proposed. 16. Section 2.9. The discussion at the meeting indicated that Peoples may accept use of a standard of "commercially reasonable" with regard to its judgment under 2.9(i) and MEH's obligation to perform in accordance with the Operating Statement, Laws and Judgments in 2.9(ii). I was surprised that Peoples suggested this re 2.9. As I understand it, the concern is that MEH should not be liable for contract damages in the event that it acts in a commercially reasonable manner, but cannot, for some reason, comply with the GTC or a Law or Judgment. I wonder if we can accomplish this result with language in a later section of the Agreement regarding liability. My concern is that a provision indicating that MEH's responsibility for compliance with regualtory requirements, Laws and Judgments is limited to best efforts or items it knows about may raise a red flag for the regulators. I would like to discuss whether there is another way to deal with potential liability without changing 2.9(ii) to refer to "best" or "commercially reasonable" efforts. Let's discuss tomorrow. 17. Section 10.1. Filing for Governmental Approval. At the meeting, Peoples indicated that, although it believes it should have sole control over regulatory filings, Peoples will agree to include a provision indicating that:"Prior to the filing of applications, pleadings or testimony related to approval for operation of the Hub, Peoples will provide copies of such materials to MEH, and consider comments provided by MEH." We should discuss with the business peoples whether this is sufficient, and how specific this provision should be. The language here would be comparable to that inserted in 6.1 regarding the right to review and comment on changes to the GTC. 18. Dissolution of MEH. Peoples agreed that a portion of our proposed 15.1(f), up to the word "terminated" on line 2 should be restored. Peoples only concern in proposing deletion was that the LLC Agreement might be requested by the ICC Staff due to the reference. As revised, the reference is removed. 19. Confidentiality. Peoples agreed to re-think the provisions of 17.1 re confidentiality of the compensation provions of Articles 3 and 7. This was not confidential in the NIGAS approval proceeding. Because the ICC Staff will be aware of the provisions, I do not know why Peoples proposes to require the procedures needed to maintain confidentiality of these provisions in the approval proceeding. 20. Section 18.4. Peoples agreed to mutual review and agreement re forward-looking statements re the Hub. 21. Section 2.4. At the meeting, Peoples agreed that the third sentence is confusing and should be revised. I would suggest: " Peoples will inform MEH promptly after it learns of information indicating that a revision to information regarding Hub Capacity should be made or proposed in accordance with this Section." Tomorrow, I will re-review my notes to make sure that I have covered the regulatory areas. I have notes on other sections also if you have any need for them. I'll give you a call tomorrow after I return from a morning hearing around 11:00am.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Tana: Theresa Brogan needs a link to the database. She works in Gary Hickerson's group. Thanks. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 10:58 AM --------------------------- "Brashear, Charlotte" <[email protected]> on 10/10/2000 09:45:27 AM To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: RE: Michaelisms You gave me my laugh for the week! -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 9:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Michaelisms ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 09:39 AM --------------------------- (Embedded Enron North America Corp. image moved to file: From: Kay Mann pic25693.pcx) 10/10/2000 09:38 AM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Michaelisms Michael has been peppering me with questions lately: Do you have to be rich to run for president? Do you have to follow in your father's footsteps when you grow up? How would it be if I kicked the ball through the clouds and God caught it? Can you see God? Where is God? Why did Dolly die (pathology, not philosophy)? Was it fleas and worms? And when he was mad at Neil: Mom, you picked the wrong husband. I'm sure there have been more - this was just Sunday and Monday! Kay
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Tell you what Chad, you win. I really am tired of banging my head against a wall talking to an irrational person. I was not trying to make fun of your school, you chose that route. I was trying to make a simple point that recruiting at Enron does not make a school elite. Does NASA recruit at LSU? Does IBM? Who cares? The point once again, we were talking about SPORTS!!!! See you in Baton Rouge in September. Go ahead and respond, so that way you have the "last word".
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Users will be the entire West Desk: Darron Giron Anne Bike Pat Ryder Ryan O'Rourke Carole Frank Elizabeth Shim Kristen Clause Thanks. DG To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Wei Hu/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy Hernandez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: XL Book Who are going to be users (people uploading the file into RiskTrac)? BM Enron North America Corp. From: Darron C Giron 03/09/2001 02:46 PM To: Burton McIntyre/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: XL Book Burton, The file will be called GD_NEW DG
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
> > > DELL & ENRON ClickAtHome ORDER CONFIRMATION > > Thank you for your Enron ClickAtHome order! Please read and retain this > e-mail for your records. It contains important information relating to > your order that should be used in any future communications with Dell. > > Your Dell customer number is: 12213206 > > Your order number is: 483017901 > > Your total "Out of Pocket" amount: $565.96 > The total "Out of Pocket" amount includes upgrade costs, shipping and > taxes. > > > Your Online Sales Point of Contact: > We are here to assist you with your order if needed. Our office hours are > Monday- Friday, 8am-7pm Central Standard Time. You can reach our office > by calling 1-866-220-3355 or through e-mail at: > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> . > > Estimated Ship Date: > We estimate that your order should be shipped on or before 12/29/00. > Although we do not anticipate a delay in your order, we cannot guarantee > the shipping date as we occasionally run into unexpected delays in > manufacturing. Your order is being shipped to you under Dell's terms and > conditions of sale found at: www.dell.com <http://www.dell.com>. > > Total Satisfaction Policy: > If you wish to cancel your order for any reason within 30 days, we'll > refund amounts paid by you, minus shipping costs, no questions asked. You > are responsible for the cost of shipping your system back to us. > > How to Check Order Status: > If you would like to check the status of your order, please call Dell's > automated order status inquiry system at: 1-800-433-9014, or visit Dell's > Order Status Page at: <http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp>. > > > You can also register to have Dell e-mail you when your order is shipped, > by going to: > <http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/watchreg.asp?ordnum>. > > How to reach a Technical Support Representative: > Once you have received your equipment, if you need to contact a Dell > technical support representative, please call 1-866-220-3355, option 3. > You will be asked to give your "Service Tag Number". The "Service Tag > Number" is a five digit alphanumeric number written on the white bar code > label on the back of the system. Please have this number ready before you > contact the technical support representative. > > > Thank you for participating in the Dell/ Enron ClickAtHome program. It is > my pleasure to work with you. > > Sincerely, > > > > Jerome Alder > Dell Sales Rep. > EPP > 1-800-695-8133 > Ext. 49761 > Email:[email protected] > >
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
is Lavorato on distribution list?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
We will continue monitoring the A line H2O reading at Sublette which is now reading approximately 13.8 pounds of water. This is the H2O content of the Haskell and Sublette field after it has been dehyed. It is important to remember that the A line is discharged into the B Line suction thus the H20 is being blended down to 1 pound. If you have any questions call me or the Sublette Team. Dale -----Original Message----- From: Welsh, Edward Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:49 PM To: DL-ETS Gas Controllers; Sublette, Team; Marshall, George Subject: H20 Readings at Sublette station Disregard Sublette's A-line H20 readings at register# 7079. Scott at Sublette station is having George Marshall remove it from the system. Sublette is not flowing up the A-line anymore. We need to continue to focus on the B-line moisture. Ed
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Ben, Attached is a revised Confidentiality Agreement which incorporates many of your suggested changes. Several additional changes are being made to address issues associated with the inadvertent erosion of key provisions benefiting both Enron and Cinergy that resulted from other changes in your latest drafts. I assure you that this document with your changes incorporated is less than what Cinergy has been willing to agree to in the past. I look forward to a favorable response so the pressing need for exchange of documents and further business discussions can proceed expeditiously. <<Clean Confidentiality Agreement with Enron North American Corp. sent via e-mail to Ben Roger on 61600 - this document is a clean one acceptin the blacklined changes from #61409.DOC>> - Clean Confidentiality Agreement with Enron North American Corp. sent via e-mail to Ben Roger on 61600 - this document is a clean one acceptin the blacklined changes from #61409.DOC
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Jeff, Attached is a draft copy of a presentation that was created as an internal briefing document on the business activities within EGM. The purpose of this presentation is to communicate our activities and provide individuals with a more detailed reference document on these businesses in case they come up in Q&A or if you need some quick facts about these businesses and I'm not around. This is a confidential and internal document, which includes earnings targets, goals and objectives. We have a shorter more external version that we use to describe our businesses. I can provide that copy if you are interested. Please don,t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or would like to discuss this in more detail. Mike PS - I will also send one of these to IR and PR
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 ----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/01/2001 05:27 PM ----- "Chris Micheli" <[email protected]> 04/30/2001 06:19 PM To: "Susan McCabe" <[email protected]>, "Sue Mara" <[email protected]>, "Steven Kelley" <[email protected]>, "Steve Ponder" <[email protected]>, "Stephanie Newell" <[email protected]>, "Scott Sadler" <[email protected]>, "Scott Govenar" <[email protected]>, "Sandi McCubbin" <[email protected]>, "Ron Tom" <[email protected]>, "Roger Pelote" <[email protected]>, "Robert Ross" <[email protected]>, "Rina Venturini" <[email protected]>, "Richard Hyde" <[email protected]>, "Rachel King" <[email protected]>, "Phil Isenberg" <[email protected]>, "Paula Soos" <[email protected]>, "Mike Monagan" <[email protected]>, "Maureen O'Haren" <[email protected]>, "Marie Moretti" <[email protected]>, "Lynn Lednicky" <[email protected]>, "Kent Palmerton" <[email protected]>, "Katie Kaplan" <[email protected]>, "Kassandra Gough" <[email protected]>, "Julee Ball" <[email protected]>, "John Stout" <[email protected]>, "John Larrea" <[email protected]>, "Joe Ronan" <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich" <[email protected]>, "Jean Munoz" <[email protected]>, "Jan Smutny Jones" <[email protected]>, "Jack Pigott" <[email protected]>, "Hedy Govenar" <[email protected]>, "Greg Blue" <[email protected]>, "Fred Pownall" <[email protected]>, "Delaney Hunter" <[email protected]>, "Chuck Cole" <[email protected]>, "Bev Hansen" <[email protected]>, "Anne Kelly" <[email protected]>, "Andy Brown" <[email protected]>, "John Norwood" <[email protected]>, "Pete Conaty" <[email protected]>, "Matt Kilroy" <[email protected]>, "Cary Rudman" <[email protected]>, "Carolyn McIntyre" <[email protected]>, "Barbara LeVake" <[email protected]>, "Pat Pape" <[email protected]>, "Mohammed Alrai" <[email protected]>, "Kent Robertson" <[email protected]>, "Katherine Potter" <[email protected]>, "Juan Rodriguez" <[email protected]>, "Eileen Koch" <[email protected]>, "Bill Highlander" <[email protected]>, "Aymee Ramos" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: SB 1x hearing today As you may know, SB 1x (Soto/Scott) passed the Senate Appropriations Committee by an initial vote of 7-3 (the bare minimum). Senator Soto said that the Legislature must make a "bold proposition" with this bill. She said that this experience is "like no consumer has been gouged before." The Legislature must cap rates. This bill guarantees a generous profit to generators. Senator Scott said that these generator profits have been gained off of consumers. According to FERC, over $500 million in excess profits have been reaped. Californians have been "royally mistreated" by generators. This "money has left the state (to Texas and other places)." This bill is the only solution. The PUC can change the $80 rate. Based upon the January Field Poll, Californians support this concept. We have to "stand up to the generators and say no more." Supporters were: TURN and CTRA (Lenny Goldberg). Lenny said that the FERC will not give any relief to CA ratepayers, so the Legislature has to. This bill needs to be combined with the power authority by Senator Burton to hold prices down. Other supporters of the bill included: Congress of CA Seniors; CalPIRG; CA Consumer Federation; CA Labor Federation; SEIU; Public Power Now. SEIU (public employee union) said that this bill is "the only way to put caps on rates." Opponents were CMTA ("this is the wrong medicine for solving the problem"); WSPA (does nothing to resolve the shortage of energy; we should be doing bills to stimulate greater investment in supply); Intergen said that they are looking at California market, but will not build with this bill out there. CA Wind Energy Assn (QFs oppose this bill because the rate is too low); and IEP (most productive answer to our problem is the build power plants). Senator Battin said that the price cap is lower than some of the Governor's long-term contracts at $86 per hour. Senator Scott said that the munis are, indeed, covered by the bill. He also said that the PUC can change the rates contained in this bill. Scott also said that the PUC can exempt renewables under the bill. Senator Bowen stated that the $80 figure should be removed from the bill ("this price may be inappropriate"). She suggested using the "FERC proxy price." She suggested that they look at an exemption for contracts with the state. She saw no reason to exempt the renewables because they would make a bundle with an $80 cap. Senator Poochigian said he was concerned about the majority vote issue (because this bill is allegedly revenue neutral). Scott said all of the money raised by the bill will go to ratepayers. He said that Legislative Counsel gave him an opinion (I don't know if it is written or verbal) that this scheme was permitted. Poochigian said it was ironic that the PUC was being given the authority to set rates under this bill. Senator Scott stated that they would take as an author's amendment to exclude all long-term contracts from the provisions of this bill. Next stop for the bill is the Senate Floor. Chris Micheli, Esq. Carpenter Snodgrass & Associates 1201 K Street, Suite 710 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 447-2251 FAX: (916) 445-5624 EMAIL: [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
[IMAGE] Go to DPO front page Careers | Homes | Autos | Yellow Pages [IMAGE] '); document.write(''); document.write('[IMAGE] '); document.write(''); document.write(''); document.write(''); [IMAGE] Tuesday, June 05, 2001 [IMAGE] ABOUT US/HELP [IMAGE] ARCHIVES [IMAGE] BOOKS [IMAGE] BUSINESS [IMAGE] CLASSIFIEDS [IMAGE] COLUMNISTS [IMAGE] COMMUNITY [IMAGE] DISCUSSION [IMAGE] E-MAIL US [IMAGE] ENTERTAINMENT [IMAGE] FOOD/DINING [IMAGE] LIFESTYLES [IMAGE] NEWS [IMAGE] NEWSLETTERS [IMAGE] OBITUARIES [IMAGE] OPINION [IMAGE] SHOPPING [IMAGE] SPECIAL SECTIONS [IMAGE] SPORTS [IMAGE] - Avalanche [IMAGE] - Broncos [IMAGE] - Colleges [IMAGE] - Columns [IMAGE] - Discussions [IMAGE] - Golf [IMAGE] - Motor Sports [IMAGE] - Nuggets [IMAGE] - Olympics [IMAGE] - Other Sports [IMAGE] - Preps [IMAGE] - Rapids [IMAGE] - Recreation [IMAGE] - Rockies [IMAGE] - Scores [IMAGE] - Women's Sports [IMAGE] TRAVEL [IMAGE] WEATHER [IMAGE] DPO HOME [IMAGE] SEARCH DPO: Enter search term, hit return key Click here foradvanced search Broncos Topper Bears courting Sundquist Ted Sundquist, the Denver Broncos' director of collegiate scouting, had a second interview with Chicago Bears officials Sunday and is considered one of three finalists for the job as VP and GM. story, 6/5 'I know I can still play' In a perfect world, Steve Beuerlein still would be the Carolina Panthers' starting quarterback. In the real world of the NFL, the 36-year-old will have to settle for playing backup quarterback for Denver. story, 6/1 Griese leads quarterback shuffle mailbag The Denver Post's Broncos writer takes your questions each week and responds to the pick of the litter in "Adam Schefter's Broncos Mailbag." Check out the first of two summer installments as Adam tackles questions ranging from the silly to the scintillating, including several about the QB situtaion. mailbag, 5/24 Denver signs QB Beuerlein story, 5/31 Broncos fancying Coleman notes, 5/30 6/5/2001 1:12:02 AM AROUND THE NFL Niners release Jerry Rice The San Francisco 49ers released legendary wide receiver Jerry Rice on Monday. He is reportedly on the verge of signing a deal with the Oakland Raiders. story - From the wire: AP | Sports Network Broncos Mailbag - Griese leads QB shuffle - Get thee to Greeley - AFC West toughens up - That's news to me, C.A. - Don't count on 3-4 View Previous Articles Select an EditionMonday, June 04, 2001Sunday, June 03, 2001Saturday, June 02, 2001Friday, June 01, 2001Thursday, May 31, 2001Wednesday, May 30, 2001Tuesday, May 29, 2001Last Seven Days All contents Copyright 2001 The Denver Post or other copyright holders. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed for any commercial purpose. Terms of use | Privacy policy Go to Section DPO A to ZAbout Us/HelpAccess Magazine - BusinessAdam Schefter - ColumnsAl Knight - ColumnistsAl Lewis - ColumnistsAngela Cortez - ColumnistsAP MoneyWire - BusinessArchivesAstronomy - WeatherAvalanche - SportsAvsEmailBeltway Notebook - ColumnsBest Bets - EntertainmentBill Husted - ColumnistsBillie Stanton - ColumnistsBob Ewegen - ColumnistsBooksBreaking News - NewsBret Saunders - ColumnistsBroncos - SportsBroncos Mailbag - BroncosBusinessCalendars - EntertainmentCaroline Schomp - ColumnistsCate Terwilliger - ColumnistsCensus - NewsChapter One - BooksCharity solicitations - NewsCharlie Meyers - ColumnsChuck Green - ColumnsClassifieds Colleges - SportsColo. Journal - LifestylesColo. KidsColorado Voices - ColumnistsColumbine - NewsColumnistsColumnists - Food/DiningColumnists - BusinessColumnists - LifestylesColumnists - OpinionColumnists - EntertainmentColumns - NewsColumns - SportsComics - EntertainmentCommunityCompass - ColumnistsComputing - BusinessConfluence Park - LifestylesContestsCritics' Choice - ColumnistsCSAP Tests - NewsDave Barry - ColumnistsDavid Thomas - ColumnistsDeals of the Week - ColumnistsDenver & The WestDiane Carman - ColumnsDick Kreck - ColumnistsDiscussionDiscussions - SportsDPO HomeDr. Wine! - ColumnistsE-Mail UsEd Quillen - Columnists EntertainmentEreo's Story - BusinessField of Genes - NewsFood/DiningFred Brown - ColumnistsFuneral notices - ObituariesGail Schoettler - ColumnistsGardening - LifestylesGlenn Giffin - ColumnistsGlenn Guzzo - ColumnistsGolf - SportsGrowth - NewsGuest Commentary - ColumnistsHealth - LifestylesHigh school of the week - PrepsHoroscopes - LifestylesI-25 Project - NewsInns for the Night - TravelInternat'l Business - BusinessInternships - About Us/HelpIrv Moss - ColumnsJim Armstrong - ColumnsJoanne Davidson - ColumnistsJoanne Ditmer - ColumnistsJoanne Ostrow - ColumnistsJohn Henderson - ColumnsJohn Meyer - ColumnsJonBenet - NewsKat Valentine - ColumnistsKelly Pate - Columnists Kristen Browning-Blas - ColumnistsLegislature - NewsLife Voices - ColumnistsLifestylesLotteryLottery - NewsMarc J. Spears - ColumnsMark Kiszla - ColumnsMcVeigh Execution - NewsMichael Booth - ColumnistsMike Keefe - ColumnistsMike Klis - ColumnsMotor Sports - SportsMovie Mania - ColumnistsMovie Reviews - EntertainmentMovie Times - EntertainmentMr. Beer - ColumnistsNeil Devlin - ColumnsNewsNewslettersNIENuggets - SportsObituariesOlympics - SportsOpinionOther Sports - SportsP.M. UpdatePenelope Purdy - ColumnistsPerspective - OpinionPeter G. Chronis - ColumnistsPhotosPolitics - NewsPrep Stats - Preps Preps - SportsPrivacy PolicyRanger - NewsRapids - SportsRecipes - Food/DiningRecreation - SportsReggie Rivers - ColumnistsRestaurants - Food/DiningReviews - BooksRock Talk - ColumnistsRockies - SportsSandra Dillard - ColumnistsScores - SportsScott Willoughby - ColumnsS! eller Beware - NewsShoppingSilver Plume - NewsSmog Report - NewsSnow Sports - SportsSound Check - ColumnistsSpecial SectionsSportsStadium - NewsStanley Cup Finals - AvalancheStock Quotes - BusinessStreet Smarts - ColumnistsSue O'Brien - ColumnistsSummer calendar - EntertainmentSunday Lifestyles - LifestylesSuzanne Brown - Fashion - ColumnistsTech Town - Columnists Terms of UseTerry Frei - ColumnsTestSectionThe Dish - ColumnistsTina Griego - ColumnsTom Kensler - ColumnsTravelTravel Notes - TravelTV Listings - EntertainmentUSAWeekend - LifestylesValkyries - SportsWall St. Journal - BusinessWar Stories - NewsWeatherWomen! 's Sports - SportsWoody Paige - ColumnsWorld/Nation - NewsWrite for us - OpinionWriters on Range - Columnists [IMAGE] [IMAGE] QB QUANDARY Who will enter the 2001 regular season as the Broncos' No. 2 QB? S. Beuerlein G. Frerotte B. Griese J. Jackson Other View Results [IMAGE] FEATURES - 2000 Results THE WIRE - News from AP - Breaking news YOUR VOICE - Live chat - Join the forum MAILBAG - Read the latest - Pose question WORDS WITH - 2000 wrap-up COLUMNS - Adam Schefter NEW STADIUM - Webcam - DPO coverage [IMAGE] (requires Flash) COMMUNITY - Fan sites denver broncos.com Logo - Roster - Depth Chart - Transactions NFL.com - Main page - Rosters - TV & Radio Ticket Exchange [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] E-Mail services provided by [IMAGE] You are subscribed to The Denver Post Online as [email protected] Change your preferences , add or delete newsletters , or unsubscribe
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Mark, I understand that I'm moving too. When? I'm going on vacation starting August 26th and will be out that entire next week and also will be out on August 18th to finish up my dental work. I've already asked Joya to let me know as soon as she does regarding firm dates so I can get Carol packed and know where to send her things. Please advise. Thanks, Suz ----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 11:07 AM ----- Carol St Clair 08/09/2000 10:57 AM To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Office Build-out Suzanne: FYI. Can you and the clerks handle packing up my office? I may be able to help but I don't want to make any commitment that I can make it up there. Hopefully, it won't take that long and the only files that need to be marked or perhaps put in the legal assistant area are the files near my window. If the move-out timing slips and happens while you are on vacation, I would prefer that it be handled before hand so that the floater doesn't have to worry about it. Let me know what you think. Sorry to impose but I tried to do as much as I could before I left. Carol St. Clair EB 3892 713-853-3989 (Phone) 713-646-3393 (Fax) [email protected] ----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 08/09/00 10:52 AM ----- Mark Taylor 08/08/00 09:08 AM To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Office Build-out It looks like Phase II of our construction project (over where Julia's office used to be) will be finished on the 18th so she will be moving into her new office that weekend. I now have the plans for Phase III and it turns out your office will be included in the construction area. Phase III will probably start on the 25th. That could always slip but I wanted to give you as much notice as possible. Hope you are all doing well. Getting any sleep yet?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I didn't redact it, but Ben might have a copy. I can email you the electronic file of the intact document. From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/16/2001 01:54 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: E-Next Generation Docs Thanks! I really could use a copy of the Blue Dog contract, especially if you redacted it to give out to bidders. Thanks! Kay Mann@ENRON 03/16/2001 11:53 AM To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: E-Next Generation Docs I'll have to send the notice separately. John's number is 713 751-3254. Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 11:53 AM --------------------------- From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/17/2001 02:47 PM To: [email protected], Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: E-Next Generation Docs Attached are the documents that you asked me to change the signature line:
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Your comments are needed for Norma Gundersen who sat in for Taffy Milligan. Please return as soon as possible. Thank you!-Becky Excellent = 5 Above Average = 4 Average = 3 Below Average = 2 Poor = 1 Initiative Cooperation Punctuality Attendance Quality of Work Would you request this person again Y/N? Comments:
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I just confirmed with Greg Whiting in Accounting that RMT made $ 250 MM contribution to ERMT. (RMT obtained such funds through a capital contribution from ENA, which in turn received a $250 MM contribution from Enron Corp.) Best regards, Susan -----Original Message----- From: Musch, Susan Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:34 PM To: Zisman, Stuart Cc: Laborde, John; Shackleton, Sara Subject: RMT Trial Balance Information Importance: High Stuart, Would you please send me your fax number so I can fax you the November 30th Trial Balance for RMT? Thanks, Susan -----Original Message----- From: Shackleton, Sara Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:53 PM To: Laborde, John; Musch, Susan; Zisman, Stuart Subject: RMT memo << File: RMT risk memo.dot >> Sara Shackleton Enron Wholesale Services 1400 Smith Street, EB3801a Houston, TX 77002 Ph: (713) 853-5620 Fax: (713) 646-3490
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Bob / Mark, Since our recent discussions over the above, I have checked the situation out extensively with the OMLX and it appears that the best solution would now be the following: 1. Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp. ("ECTRIC"), the Delaware incorporated company, becomes a member of the OMLX (either as a pure Proprietary trader or as a Market Maker - see point (a) below - Bob you need to advise me what you want here). 2. Enron Europe Finance & Trading Limited ("EEFT"), the English SFA-regulated company which acts as agent / arranger for ECTRIC, then, via EEFT's staff in London, places ECTRIC's bids / offers onto the Pulpex Index in the name of and for the account of ECTRIC. Acting purely in this "arranging" manner, EEFT itself would not be a member of the OMLX in any capacity. 3. Please note that if Steve is going to be the EEFT person in London who would place such orders onto Pulpex in the name of, and for the account of, ECTRIC, then Steve will need to become a "Registered Representative" of EEFT with the SFA before he can place such orders. As you know, this status may either be gained by Steve passing an examination or by certain length of experience in the market. I shall need to sort this out with Steve if you decide to do this. 4. Once EEFT has placed a bid / offer onto the Exchange in the name of, and for the account of, ECTRIC as the Member, if that gets "hit", then we can give-up that contract immediately to ENA's account under the Exchange's give-up procedure. Points to note: (a) ECTRIC could join the OMLX as either a Market Maker or as a Proprietary Trader. Clearly, if ECTRIC joined as a Market Maker, ECTRIC (through EEFT in London) would be obliged to make firm two way bids / offers for 2 1/4 hours during market opening hours - but so would ENA out of Houston which also has Market Maker status. Hence, Enron would have two sets of MM obligations, one with ENA and the other with ECTRIC (through EEFT in London). Bob - Do you want this?? Or would you prefer to leave the Market Making obligations with ENA and just have ECTRIC as a Proprietary Trader?? The Exchange (Derek Oliver) assures me that that there is no difference in the information available to MMs as opposed to Prop Traders and Prop Traders can post bids and offers as well as hit others bids and offers. The only difference therefore is that a Prop Trader does not have the obligation to post bids and offers during market hours. Please let me know. (b) If we go this route, the OMLX would like comfort from ECTRIC's external US counsel that ECTRIC would not be in breach of any US regulations by adopting the above structure. In obtaining this advice, we shall need to bear in mind whether, in acting on behalf of ECTRIC, EEFT in London will place orders by electronic link or by telephonic link (as is presently the case from Houston). Mark, are you able to obtain this advice?? Please let me know. (c) From discussions with Jannine of Tax Dept., there are tax implications to any form of trading through London for the US, although these are not insurmountable. Jannine will no doubt write you a separate e-mail with regard to the cost of doing such business from a Tax perspective and you should bear the contents of that in mind before deciding whether or not to proceed. Kind regards Mark
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The report named: West Power/Gas Heat Rates <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=32&report_name=West+Power/Gas+Heat+Rates&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=01/07/2002>, published as of 01/07/2002 is now available for viewing on the website. (Revision: 3)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
[email protected] writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Dear Market Participants, Software release for December 4, 2001 The ability to simultaneously offer fixed block schedules at biddable prices will be introduced to the NYISO market. This Multi-Hour Block Transaction (MHBT) functionality will allow users to specify a minimum run-time characteristic to their external transactions. SCUC will account for the minimum run- time parameter of MHBTs in determining the least production cost evaluation for the day. As a result, if SCUC schedules the MHBT, it will be scheduled at the full requested MW and requested time frame. If you have any questions, please call your Customer Relations representatve or the Help Desk at 518-356-6060. Regards, Customer Relations
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 12/13/01; HourAhead hour: 9; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121309.txt
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Question for you.... which section of Queen Anne did we think seemed better? Was is the North streets or the West? And which side of Queen Anne Ave would i want to be on....I can't remember any of this stuff. Thanks!
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Governor Gray Davis has asked that we apprise Member Companies of the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group, and our regional and statewide business colleagues, on the ways that employers can participate in conservation and energy-efficiency programs that save power and money. PLEASE NOTE that the Governor has recently signed into law a number of ways that employers can participate to save money. I hope you will forward this to the appropriate person in your company to take advantage of this program - and to help our State avoid rolling blackouts this summer. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Carl Guardino CALIFORNIA BUSINESSES: MEETING THE ENERGY CHALLENGE GENERAL HELP NUMBERS FOR BUSINESS: For all Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs: California Energy Commission: 1-800-232-4685 or 1-800-555-7794 Business Energy Help-line (M-F 8-5) (916) 445-9699 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION PROGRAMS * 20/20 Energy Rebate: Residential, commercial, and industrial customers are eligible for this voluntary program which will provide rebates to customers who reduce their summer 2001 electricity usage. Customers will receive a 20% rebate on their summer electric bill if they cut back their electricity use by 20% over last summer's level. (Direct access customers are not eligible.) SCE website and 800 number http://www.sce.com/002_save_energy/index.shtml; 1-800-736-4777 PG&E website and 800 number http://www.pge.com/003_save_energy/003b_bus/index.shtml; 1-800-468-4743 SDG&E website and 800 number http://www.sdge.com/efficiency/index.html; 1-800-411-SDGE * Incentives for Efficient Lighting (also offered by Municipal Utilities): Incentives are to encourage the purchase and use of "Energy Star" lighting fixtures, when applicable. The program also offers incentives and assistance with installation of lighting control technologies, such as dimming, timers, and occupancy sensors, which provide more peak demand reduction in commercial settings. SCE website and 800 number http://www.sce.com/002_save_energy/index.shtml; 1-800-736-4777 PG&E website and 800 number http://www.pge.com/003_save_energy/003b_bus/index.shtml; 1-800-468-4743 SDG&E website and 800 number http://www.sdge.com/efficiency/index.html; 1-800-411-SDGE * Low-energy usage building materials: California's commercial buildings account for 36% of the state's annual electricity use. During peak times, commercial buildings use 11% of the state's electricity for lighting and 15% for air conditioning. Funds will be used to identify and buy-down the cost of energy measures, such as "white roofs," used to retrofit commercial buildings for energy efficiency. Contact: Scott Matthews CEC website and 800 number www.energy.ca.gov/peakload; 1-800-555-7794 * Oil and Gas Pumping Efficiency Projects: Incentives are provided for high-efficiency pump and motor retrofits for oil and gas producers and pipeline operations. Contact: Julie Fitch (415) 703-2776 http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/static/industry/electric/energy+efficiency/programdes criptions.htm RENEWABLE ENERGY: * Emerging Renewable Account: Provides rebates for the purchase and installation of solar energy systems up to 10 kW (small business). Administered by the CEC. Contact: Sandy Miller CEC website and 800 number www.energy.ca.gov/peakload; 1-800-555-7794 * Renewable Loan Guarantee Program: Loan guarantees to purchase and install renewable energy systems, administered through the California Technology Trade and Commerce Agency. Contact: Al Salazar (916) 323-8308 * Solar Tax Credit: The Governor has proposed a new solar credit for the purchase and installation of solar energy systems between 10 kW and 200 kW for the 2001 through 2003 tax years. The credit would equal 50 percent of the net cost of the system. This proposal is in SB 17X (Brulte). Program has not yet been enacted legislatively. Contact Technology Trade and Commerce Agency: Business Energy Help-line (M-F 8-5) (916) 445-9699 or Contact the Franchise Tax Board (800) 852-5711 * Large Nonresidential Standard Performance Contract program: This program helps businesses with monthly peak demands of 500 kW or more replace inefficient equipment of a variety of types (e.g., refrigeration, air conditioning, and ventilation). SCE website and 800 number http://www.sce.com/002_save_energy/index.shtml; 1-800-736-4777 PG&E website and 800 number http://www.pge.com/003_save_energy/003b_bus/index.shtml; 1-800-468-4743 SDG&E website and 800 number http://www.sdge.com/efficiency/index.html; 1-800-411-SDGE * Small Business Standard Performance Contract program: This program is the small-business counterpart of the large program described above. It is focused on small businesses (with peak demands under 500 kW per month) and also offers financial incentives for equipment replacement, after energy savings are verified. SCE website and 800 number http://www.sce.com/002_save_energy/index.shtml; 1-800-736-4777 PG&E website and 800 number http://www.pge.com/003_save_energy/003b_bus/index.shtml; 1-800-468-4743 SDG&E website and 800 number http://www.sdge.com/efficiency/index.html; 1-800-411-SDGE * Express Efficiency program: This program offers prescribed rebates for specific energy efficiency measures to small businesses (peak demand under 500 kW). Rebates are available for lighting, air conditioning, refrigeration, food service, and agricultural efficiency measures. Rebates for specific equipment are paid up front and only require a simple application process. SCE website and 800 number http://www.sce.com/002_save_energy/index.shtml; 1-800-736-4777 PG&E website and 800 number http://www.pge.com/003_save_energy/003b_bus/index.shtml; 1-800-468-4743 SDG&E website and 800 number http://www.sdge.com/efficiency/index.html; 1-800-411-SDGE * Business Energy Guide: This publication provides energy efficiency guidance for business SCE website and 800 number http://www.sce.com/002_save_energy/index.shtml; 1-800-736-4777 PG&E website and 800 number http://www.pge.com/003_save_energy/003b_bus/index.shtml; 1-800-468-4743 SDG&E website and 800 number http://www.sdge.com/efficiency/index.html; 1-800-411-SDGE DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAMS FOR BUSINESS INVESTOR-OWNED UTILITY (IOU) INTERRUPTIBLE PROGRAMS: * Voluntary Demand Response Program (VDRP): This is a voluntary bid-based program for the commercial sector that pays $350 a megawatt hour to companies dropping loads either the day of or the day before load relief is needed. This program is open to customers who can curtail at least 15% of load, with a minimum load drop of 100kW. SCE website and 800 number http://www.sce.com/002_save_energy/index.shtml; 1-800-736-4777 PG&E website and 800 number http://www.pge.com/003_save_energy/003b_bus/index.shtml; 1-800-468-4743 SDG&E website and 800 number http://www.sdge.com/efficiency/index.html; 1-800-411-SDGE * Optional Binding Mandatory Curtailment Program (OBMC): The program exempts participants from rotating black-outs if they can reduce the load on their entire circuit by the required amount (5 to 20%) for the entire duration of every rotation outage (outages are usually for one hour). SCE website and 800 number http://www.sce.com/002_save_energy/index.shtml; 1-800-736-4777 PG&E website and 800 number http://www.pge.com/003_save_energy/003b_bus/index.shtml; 1-800-468-4743 SDG&E website and 800 number http://www.sdge.com/efficiency/index.html; 1-800-411-SDGE * New Base Interruptible Program (BIP): This program limits interruptions to one 4-hour event per day, 10 events per month, and 120 hours per year and provides a $7 per kW-month credit to participants. Alternatively, a $6 per kW penalty will be imposed for consumption in excess of firm service load. This program is open to customers who can commit at least 15% of load, with a minimum of 100kW per event. SCE website and 800 number http://www.sce.com/002_save_energy/index.shtml; 1-800-736-4777 PG&E website and 800 number http://www.pge.com/003_save_energy/003b_bus/index.shtml; 1-800-468-4743 SDG&E website and 800 number http://www.sdge.com/efficiency/index.html; 1-800-411-SDGE INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR (ISO) INTERRUPTIBLE PROGRAMS: * Demand Reduction Program (DRP): This program will pay customers a monthly reservation payment of $20,000/MW/month to be available on weekdays between 11:00 AM and 7:00 PM from June 1 through September 30 to curtail at ISO request, and will additionally receive $500/MWh for curtailed demand. This program is open to customers with a minimum aggregated load bid of 1 MW. Total curtailment time is limited to 24hr/month. Contact: Don Fuller (916) 351-4445 <http://www2.caiso.com/clientserv/load/> * Discretionary Curtailment Program (DLCP): This program is similar to the VDRP. It is a voluntary program that will pay customers a similar incentive to the VDRP to curtail load when called upon by the ISO. This program is open to customers with a minimum aggregated load of 1 MW. Contact: Don Fuller (916) 351-4445 <http://www2.caiso.com/clientserv/load/> METERING AND OTHER DEMAND-RESPONSIVE SYSTEMS CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION (CEC) PROGRAMS: * Time-of-Use Meters (CEC and IOUs): Businesses with loads over 200 kW per month will receive meters that will enable them to better track and manage their energy use and participate in demand reduction programs. Contact: Don Kazama CEC website and 800 number www.energy.ca.gov/peakload; 1-800-555-7794 * Demand Responsive Building Systems: This program provides grants to businesses to reduce demand in commercial buildings. This technology reduces electricity demand during peak periods by automatically raising thermostats, dimming appropriate lighting and reducing the electricity use of other building systems. Contact: Scott Matthews CEC website and 800 number www.energy.ca.gov/peakload; 1-800-555-7794 * Innovative Peak Load Reduction: This program takes full advantage of the innovations of the private sector to generate innovative solutions to reduce peak demand. Grants will be awarded to businesses for efficiency projects including, but not limited to, lighting and cooling efficiency improvements, solar cooling, building energy management controls, electric generation from landfill gas, and solar systems. Contact: Scott Matthews CEC website and 800 number www.energy.ca.gov/peakload; 1-800-555-7794 MORE ENERGY SAVING PROGRAMS AND TIPS: * Inspectors from private firms called ESCOs (Energy Service Companies) can audit your building, identify how you can reduce energy costs, specify the equipment needed, finance the project, install the equipment and then guarantee that it will operate properly. Generally, the ESCO shares the financial risk associated with the project and in return keeps some of the savings on your energy bill. Call your utility company for more details. Technology Trade and Commerce Agency * Business Best-practices web site: http://commerce.ca.gov/energy * Business Energy Help-line (M-F 8-5) (916) 445-9699 GOVERNOR'S RATE PROPOSAL: The Governor's proposal allocates the same percentage rate increase to residential and to commercial/industrial customers and makes changes only to businesses' current rate structures. Customers on time-of-use rates, as well as those who are not, would receive the same percentage increase. Time-of-use increases would be allocated only to the peak and mid-peak rates, in an effort to encourage more intensive conservation at times when it is most needed. The Governor also supports a direct access option for business customers that ensures the financial stability of the bridge loan and revenue bonds that are needed to back the state's power purchases. - winmail.dat
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Anita: Thanks for your note. You made a great contribution to the Singapore office and I thank you for that. Have a happy new year! Mark Haedicke
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Last week we had our annual Links meeting in Liberal to go over upcoming outages this summer and coordinate them with Mobile & OXY (well testing) and Oneok ( field compression & Bushton Plant). The goal of the Links meeting is to improve communications and coordinate outage so that we can have the least amount of throughput loss for all. We also discuss any ideas that can be improved on. One idea that Mobile brought up is they would like to call into gas control in the morning around 6:30 to 7:00 and get an update of any outages during the night in the Hugoton area that may have caused them to be short on gas. They need this information so they can report in their marketing meeting so they can adjust noms. So if the central controller could start making notes of any outages in Hugoton during the night that affected flow and pass them on to the day crew they would have this information to pass on and not have to look it up. This would be very helpful for Mobile. They may not call every morning but we need to have the information when they do. Thanks Gary
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I've taken the liberty of drafting a form of extension letter to extend the ILA until June 15. I suspect Reagan will be distributing to the commercial folks, but I thought I would give you a heads up. David, I'm at work on revising the longer term doc. If you have your preamble stuff ready, I'm happy to put it in now. Thanks, Kay PS The salutation is to "Gentlemen". Are the members of the commission and MDEA all men? I don't want to commit a blunder.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 01:29 PM --------------------------- "George Richards" <[email protected]> on 09/26/2000 01:18:45 PM Please respond to <[email protected]> To: "Phillip Allen" <[email protected]> cc: "Larry Lewter" <[email protected]>, "Claudia L. Crocker" <[email protected]> Subject: Investment Structure STRUCTURE: Typically the structure is a limited partnership with a corporate (or LLC) general partner. The General Partner owns 1% of the project and carries the liability of construction. LAND OWNERSHIP & LOANS The property would be purchased in the name of the limited partnership and any land loans, land improvements loans and construction loans would be in the name of the limited partnership. Each of the individual investors and all of the principals in Creekside would also personally guarantee the loans. If the investor(s) do not sign on the loans, this generally means that a larger amount of cash is required and the investor's share of profits is reduced. All loans for residential construction, that are intended for re-sale, are full recourse loans. If we are pursuing multifamily rental developments, the construction loans are still full recourse but the mortgage can often be non-recourse. USE OF INITIAL INVESTMENT The initial investment is used for land deposit, engineering & architectural design, soils tests, surveys, filing fees, legal fees for organization and condominium association formation, and appraisals. Unlike many real estate investment programs, none of the funds are used for fees to Creekside Builders, LLC. These professional expenses will be incurred over the estimated 6 month design and approval period. EARLY LAND COSTS The $4,000 per month costs listed in the cash flow as part of land cost represent the extension fees due to the seller for up to 4 months of extensions on closing. As an alternative, we can close into a land loan at probably 70% of appraised value. With a land value equal to the purchase price of $680,000 this would mean a land loan of $476,000 with estimated monthly interest payments of $3,966, given a 10% annual interest rate, plus approximately 1.25% of the loan amount for closing costs and loan fees. EQUITY AT IMPROVEMENT LOAN Once the site plan is approved by the City of Austin, the City will require the development entity to post funds for fiscal improvements, referred to as the "fiscals". This cost represents a bond for the completion of improvements that COA considers vital and these funds are released once the improvements have been completed and accepted by COA. This release will be for 90% of the cost with the remaining 10% released one year after completion. Releases can be granted once every 90 days and you should expect that the release would occur 6 months after the start of lot improvement construction. These fiscals are usually posted in cash or an irrevocable letter of credit. As such, they have to be counted as a development cost, even though they are not spent. Because they are not spent no interest is charged on these funds. The lot improvement loan is typically 75% of the appraised value of a finished lot, which I suspect will be at least $20,000 and potentially as high as $25,000. This would produce a loan amount of $15,000 on $20,000 per lot. With estimated per lot improvement costs of $9,000, 'fiscals' at $2,000 and the land cost at $8,000 , total improved lot cost is $19,000 which means $0 to $4,000 per lot in total equity. The investment prior to obtaining the improvement loan would count towards any equity requirement provided it was for direct costs. Thus, the additional equity for the improvement loan would be $0-$184,000. Even if the maximum loan would cover all costs, it is unlikely the bank would allow reimbursement of funds spent. The higher estimates of equity investments are shown in the preliminary proforma to be on the safe side. The engineer is preparing a tentative site layout with an initial evaluation of the phasing, which can significantly reduce the cash equity requirement. Phasing works as follows. If the first phase was say 40 units, the total lot improvement cost might average $31,000 per lot. Of this, probably $13,000 would be for improvements and $19,000 for the land cost. The improvements are higher to cover large one time up front costs for design costs, the entry road, water treatment costs, perimeter fencing and landscaping, and so on, as well as for 100% of the land. The land loan for undeveloped lots would be 70% of the appraised raw lot value, which I would estimate as $10,000 per lot for a loan value of $7,000 per lot. Then the loan value for each improved lot would be $15,000 per lot. This would give you a total loan of $992,000, total cost of $1,232,645 for equity required of $241,000. This was not presented in the initial analysis as the phasing is depended on a more careful assessment by the Civil Engineer as the separate phases must each be able to stand on its own from a utility standpoint. CONSTRUCTION LOANS There are three types of construction loans. First, is a speculative (spec) loan that is taken out prior to any pre-sales activity. Second, is a construction loan for a pre-sold unit, but the loan remains in the builder/developers name. Third, is a pre-sold unit with the construction loan in the name of the buyer. We expect to have up to 8 spec loans to start the project and expect all other loans to be pre-sold units with loans in the name of the builder/developer. We do not expect to have any construction loans in the name of the buyers, as such loans are too difficult to manage and please new buyers unfamiliar with the process. Spec loans will be for 70% to 75% of value and construction loans for pre-sold units, if the construction loan is from the mortgage lender, will be from 80% to 95% of value. DISBURSEMENTS Disbursements will be handled by the General Partner to cover current and near term third party costs, then to necessary reserves, then to priority payments and then to the partners per the agreement. The General Partner will contract with Creekside Builders, LLC to construct the units and the fee to CB will include a construction management and overhead fee equal to 15% of the direct hard cost excluding land, financing and sales costs. These fees are the only monies to Creekside, Larry Lewter or myself prior to calculation of profit, except for a) direct reimbursement for partnership expenses and b) direct payment to CB for any subcontractor costs that it has to perform. For example, if CB cannot find a good trim carpenter sub, or cannot find enough trim carpenters, etc., and it decides to undertake this function, it will charge the partnership the same fee it was able to obtain from third parties and will disclose those cases to the partnership. Finally, CB will receive a fee for the use of any of its equipment if it is used in lieu of leasing equipment from others. At present CB does not own any significant equipment, but it is considering the purchase of a sky track to facilitate and speed up framing, cornice, roofing and drywall spreading. REPORTING We are more than willing to provide reports to track expenses vs. plan. What did you have in mind? I would like to use some form of internet based reporting. BOOKKEEPING I am not sure what you are referring to by the question, "Bookkeeping procedures to record actual expenses?" Please expand. INVESTOR INPUT We are glad to have the investor's input on design and materials. As always the question will be who has final say if there is disagreement, but in my experience I have always been able to reach consensus. As you, and I presume Keith, want to be involved to learn as much as possible we would make every effort to be accommodating. CREEKSIDE PROCEEDURES CB procedures for dealing with subs, vendors and professionals is not as formal as your question indicates. In the EXTREMELY tight labor market obtaining 3 bids for each labor trade is not feasible. For the professional subs we use those with whom we have developed a previous rapport. Finally, for vendors they are constantly shopped. PRE-SELECTED PROFESSIONALS, SUBS AND VENDORS Yes there are many different subs that have been identified and I can provide these if you are interested. I know I have not answered everything, but this is a starting point. Call when you have reviewed and we can discuss further. Sincerely, George Richards President, Creekside Builders, LLC - winmail.dat
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
CALENDAR ENTRY: APPOINTMENT Description: Staff Mtg. Conference room EB4102 Date: 5/14/2001 Time: 10:30 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time) Chairperson: Outlook Migration Team Detailed Description:
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }