text
stringlengths
1
1.59M
meta
dict
T O D A Y G O D I S F I R S T Marketplace Meditations by Os Hillman The Door of Full Surrender But He knows the way that I take; when He has tested me, I will come forth as gold. - (Job 23:10) I was recently sitting with the leader of a marketplace organization as he described a question he poses to businesspeople. "What if there were two doors to choose from; behind one door was the complete will of God for your life and behind the other door was how life could be according to your own preference. Which door would you choose?" The struggle for most lies in the desire to follow God completely and the fear of what might be behind the door of full surrender. Most of us desire to follow God, but few of us will do it at any cost. We do not really believe that God loves us to the degree that we are willing to give Him complete permission to do as He wills in us. If we desire to fully walk with Christ, there is a cost. We may give intellectual assent and go along with His principles and do fine; however, if we are fully given over to Him and His will for our life, it will be a life that will have adversity. The Bible is clear that humans do not achieve greatness without having their sinful will broken. This process is designed to create a nature change in each of us, not just a habit change. The Bible calls it circumcision. Circumcision is painful, bloody, and personal. If God has plans to greatly use you in the lives of others, you can expect your trials to be even greater than those of others. Why? Because, like Joseph who went through greater trials than most patriarchs, your calling may have such responsibility that God cannot afford to entrust it to you without ensuring your complete faithfulness to the call. He has much invested in you on behalf of others. He may want to speak through your life to a greater degree than through another. The events of your life would become the frame for the message He wants to speak through you. Do not fear the path that God may lead you on. Embrace it. For God may bring you down a path in your life to ensure the reward of your inheritance. "For our light and momentary troubles are achieving for us an eternal glory that far outweighs them all" (2 Cor. 4:17). ----------- This daily devotional is published and distributed by Crosswalk.com. It is written by Os Hillman, president of Marketplace Leaders, located in Atlanta, GA. His email address is <[email protected]>. For more articles and books by Os Hillman you may visit his web site at http://www.marketplaceleaders.org. Additional devotionals are available from Crosswalk.com: <http://devotionals.crosswalk.com> ----------- To read the Current Feature Story from ReligionToday, go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentFeatureStory/ For today's complete News Summary from ReligionToday, go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentNewsSummary/ ----------- For Copyright Terms go to http://www.crosswalk.com/info/copyright ____________________SUBSCRIPTION INFO_______________________ * You subscribed to Marketplace Meditations as: < [email protected] > * To unsubscribe from this newsletter immediately, click here: < http://link.crosswalk.com/UM/U.ASP?A3.12.261895 > If that link is not clickable, simply copy and paste it into your browser window. * To change your address: unsubscribe your old address and then subscribe your new address. * To subscribe, send an email to: < [email protected] > or go to < http://www.crosswalk.com/lists > for a complete list of our newsletters. * Copyright , 2001 Crosswalk.com, Inc. and its Content Providers. All rights reserved. ____________________________________________________________
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Kate Prebon shows $114.95 as the price and we show $214.95 Kate Symes @ ECT 12/04/2000 12:31 PM To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Missing deal for Jeff Richter for Dec.1 This is actually deal #471975, which I just fixed because Jeff forgot to put the broker name in there. It is with Prebon. Thanks, Kate Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON 12/04/2000 10:18 AM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Missing deal for Jeff Richter for Dec.1 JEff Richter Prebon sent over a statement where: Enron buys from EES 12/5-12/30 25 mw of SP-15 at $114.95
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Clint and Sara, I have enclosed the revised confirm for your review - one blackline version and one clean version - per Paul Rosica. <<ENRON.forward.10.26.00.blackline.doc>> <<ENRON.forward.10.26.00.clean.doc>> Enjoy your weekend. Regards, Phil Phil Franz Transaction Management/Equity Derivatives Lehman Brothers (212)526-8482 [email protected] > This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the > designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, > dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly > prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and > should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an > offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any > transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers Inc., its > subsidiaries or affiliates. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be > secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this > information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as > such. All information is subject to change without notice. > - ENRON.forward.10.26.00.blackline.doc - ENRON.forward.10.26.00.clean.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Parker, Megan Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:47 PM To: Tholt, Jane M. Subject: Cook Inlet Purchase July 2001 Jane: I received an invoice from Cook Inlet for July for three deals on EPNG that we do not have in the system. My contact faxed me their confirmations and I have located two of the deals in Path Manager, but I cannot find the third. The two that I can find are EOL deals on 7/31 that have not been pathed. They are deal numbers 952730 and 952205. The third deal was for 5,000/day from 7/28 - 7/30 at $4.70. They show a trade date of 7/27. I don't see this deal in the system at all. My contact says that all of these deals were offset deals that should have been sold back to Cook Inlet. He thinks that we billed him for part of the gas, but we have not paid for any of it. Did we buy this gas from Cook Inlet? Should it all be sold back to Cook Inlet? I would appreciate any help you can give me. Thanks, Megan x5-7480
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I am Mr. Kean's assistant, Maureen McVicker. I will try to get you the answers to these questions as soon as possible. I will also send you an email picture of Mr. Kean. Maureen McVicker "Kiyoshi Ando" <[email protected]> 01/23/2001 10:04 AM To: <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Follow ups Mr. Steve Kean Executive Vice President Enron Corp Dear Mr. Steve Kean It was such a pleasure having chance do an interview last week. I have a few follow up questions. 1)According to today's Wall Street Journal, Mr. Jeffrey Skilling, president and chief executive-elect of Enron, is saying the company could sell some power to PG&E and SoCal at 55 cents per kilowatt hour. Am I understanding your position right? Is it going to be something like a 5 year contract? Will it help your business at all? 2)California Power Exchange has decided to cease its operation by the end of April. Do you think this is the right decision? How do you think you can set up a new competitive market? Or, won't you need such a market? Will it be better to use the markets outside Califorinia or to rely on direct trading? 3)How much supply do you have in excess from which you can offer power to California? ****************************************************************************** * I understand you are very busy but I would really appreciate if you could send me a reply at your earliest convenience. Thank you very much. **************************************************************************** Kiyoshi Ando NIKKEI News TEL 202-204-2104 FAX 202-737-0170 e-mail [email protected] 815, Connecticut Ave. NW #310 Washington DC 20006
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
WIN A CARIBBEAN CRUISE FROM PRICELINE.COM! Dear priceline customer, Where can you find a rock-climbing wall, a nine-hole golf course, an ice-skating rink, fine dining and white sandy beaches - all in one place? Only on Royal Caribbean's Voyager of the Seas. It's one of the world's largest cruise ships and you could find yourself and a guest aboard FREE if you're the winner of priceline's Caribbean Cruise Sweepstakes. On a big boat like this, big fun is sure to follow -- so Come Aboard! http://offers.priceline.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=mE1q0Ea6bM0Bo50BCI80B5 Royal Carribean International is the proud sponsor of the priceline.com Caribbean Cruise Sweepstakes. http://offers.priceline.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=mE1q0Ea6bM0Bo50BCJA0BG Hurry, deadline for entry is midnight Eastern Time December 31, 2001. For more details, see our official sweepstakes rules. http://offers.priceline.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=mE1q0Ea6bM0Bo50BCJB0BH Enter for your chance to win! http://offers.priceline.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=mE1q0Ea6bM0Bo50BCI80B5 7 Day Caribbean Cruise for Two. You and a guest will enjoy an Oceanview Stateroom aboard Royal Caribbean's incredible Voyager of the Seas. Enjoy breakfast on your own private balcony! Exotic Ports of Call. Your cruise will take you to the finest beachfront locations in the Caribbean, including Grand Cayman, Cozumel and Royal Caribbean's private island of Labadee. Air transportation for two to Miami. Priceline will get you from your home town to Miami -- the home port for this spectacular adventure. CLICK HERE TO ENTER! http://offers.priceline.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=mE1q0Ea6bM0Bo50BCI80B5 QUESTIONS? If you have questions about these promotions or a previous priceline request, please click here. http://offers.priceline.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=mE1q0Ea6bM0Bo50BATr0BD When you made your priceline request, you asked to receive future updates and news on our products and services. We hope you found this information useful. If you would like to unsubscribe from future updates, click here. mailto:[email protected] Powered by DARTmail http://offers.priceline.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=mE1q0Ea6bM0Bo50BAhc0BI
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Stephanie, Prior to the execution of the ISDA Master, LD had crossed out some stuff on their confirms (ex. governing law) and stuff on the Annex - and we have been unable to fully execute these outstanding deals. So... since any outstanding deals are now covered by the Master, what do we do about the ones that weren't fully executed and had markups? Diane -----Original Message----- From: Panus, Stephanie Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:08 PM To: Cisneros, Celeste Cc: Anderson, Diane Subject: RE: Louis Dreyfus Energy Services L.P. Celeste, Can you remind me what the problems were? If they were related to confirming trades, all trades should now be confirmed under the Master Agreement and all trades that were confirmed prior to the execution of the Master will also now be governed by the Master. Stephanie -----Original Message----- From: Cisneros, Celeste Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:32 AM To: Panus, Stephanie Cc: Anderson, Diane Subject: RE: Louis Dreyfus Energy Services L.P. Hey Stephanie. Now that they have signed this ISDA for Louis Drefus Energy Services, LP, how does that effect the confirmations that have been sent out in the past? We are assuming this ISDA addressed the problems that were sent up to legal a few months ago (Frank Sayre) and we now need to know how to move forward and get our existing confirmations executed. Can you confirm if it did address the issues we sent to legal and how we need to proceed to get these outstanding confirmations executed? Thanks. FYI, we have confirmations in 'Sent to Counterparty' status since December 13, 2000. -----Original Message----- From: Panus, Stephanie Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:59 PM To: Adams, Laurel; Allen, Kimberly; Anderson, Diane; Bell, Jean; Bowen, Bob; Brewer, Julie; Cason, Sharen; Cisneros, Celeste; Fischer, Jason; Garcia, Jorge A. ; Heaney, Gordon; Hundl, Kimberly; Hunter, Larry Joe; Murphy, Melissa Ann; Ornelas, Bianca; Piwetz, Stephanie; Rodriguez, Melissa; Seib, Dianne; Tackett, Scott; Theriot, Kim S.; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.; Brown, Angela Y.; Conwell, Wendy; Curry, Ken; Espinoza, Veronica; Gonzalez, Veronica; Johnson, Rudwell; Landry, Shemeika S.; Lebrocq, Wendi; Mendoza, Nidia; Monterrey, Maribel; Moran, Tom; Ngo, Tracy; North, Carol; Otto, Randy; Radous, Paul; Rajaram, Aparna; Rohauer, Tanya; Sacks, Edward; Sonnonstine, Max; Vanek, Darren; Williams, Jason R (Credit); Campos, Anthony; Colbert, Marilyn; Crawford, Sharon; Ebow, Amber; Ellstrom, Diane; Gerard, Camille; Hare, Bill D.; Johnson, Cheryl; Lambert, Karen; Landau, Georgi; Lees, Lisa; Moore, Jason; Neuner, Dale; Reeves, Leslie; Richardson, Stacey; Rodriguez, Bernice; Schott, Samuel; Sever, Stephanie; Shivers, Lynn; Sietzema, Linda; Southard, Carrie; Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Cook, Mary; Gray, Barbara N.; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Jones, Tana; Keiser, Holly; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Nelson, Cheryl; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Taylor, Mark E (Legal) Subject: Louis Dreyfus Energy Services L.P. We have received an executed financial master agreement: Type of Agreement: ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border) Effective Date: November 9, 2000 Enron Entity: Enron North America Corp. Counterparty: Louis Dreyfus Energy Services L.P. Transactions Covered: Approved for all products with the exception of: Foreign Exchange Confirming Party: Enron North America Corp. Governing Law: New York Special Handling: no special handling requirements Copies will be distributed. Stephanie Panus
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Got your address wrong the first time. John Brindle Enron Corporation Business Controls Tel: 713.853.3843 Fax:713.646.8838 ----- Forwarded by John Brindle/Enron Communications on 04/11/01 06:53 PM ----- |--------+-----------------------> | | John Brindle | | | | | | 04/11/01 | | | 07:06 PM | | | | |--------+-----------------------> >-----------------------------------------------------| | | | To: [email protected] | | cc: [email protected], | | [email protected] | | Subject: Personnel from Houston | >-----------------------------------------------------| Wade, I work for Steve Kean and he has asked me to coordinate and assist in the ongoing efforts to secure our employees, their dependents, and Enron property in India. I understand Mike Hicks is on his way to Mumbai. However, I have discussed this with both Steve and Rebecca McDonald and I am sending David Cromley, Kyle Norosky and John Presley from my group to assist your staff in completing the arrangements already underway. By way of background, Jim Roth in London, Dave, Kyle and I are former colleagues. John also has a similar background. Each has skills and experience which I believe will be useful in accomplishing the tasks at hand and will be able to provide you the support and assistance you require. They will arrive in Mumbai late Saturday evenning and will be staying at the Oberoi. I will attempt to reach you by telephone in a few hours. Please feel free to contact me at home (281.225.8933) if you receive this before I call you. John John Brindle Enron Corporation Business Controls Tel: 713.853.3843 Fax:713.646.8838
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
We will be celebrating our March and April Birthdays by having Marble Slab on Thursday, March 22nd. It will be at 2:00 by conference room EB3267. Our Birthdays include: Liz Bellamy Steve Gillespie Heather Choate Bob Hall Joann Collins Clem Cernosek Kim Olinger Cindy Franklin Cora Pendergrass Beverly Beaty Shelly Mendel Darren Espey
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
It's been quite a while since we caught up on things. How are you doing these days? Things here are pretty good. I went about a month ago and visited Emily in London and have been busy with work, etc. Hope you had a good Fourth of July!!! Susan
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sorry, but the invitation asked for reply by April 20. I have emailed the Feinbergs of my acceptance. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) [email protected] [email protected] 04/15/2001 01:23 PM To: [email protected], [email protected] cc: Subject: Friday Night Dinner We have not heard whether you will be joining us for dinner on Friday night. Please let us or the Feinberg's know. Anita and Steve
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Rick: This will give you an idea of the kinds of work we're doing for the Weather group. Elsa is now in this group, by the way. She is helping to develop weather products for EES/ENA. I think this project - which is broader than weather - is very exciting. Lisa -----Original Message----- From: Piekielniak, Elsa Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:15 AM To: Yoho, Lisa Subject: RE: Government Affairs and Weather Great memo. I'll look forward to meeting re: the following. See ya, Elsa P.S. I had a 'Cosmopoliton' w/ my husband at Las Alamedas the other day and it was soooooooo strong. We'll have to have drinks and catch up some time. -----Original Message----- From: Yoho, Lisa Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:48 AM To: Tawney, Mark Cc: Piekielniak, Elsa; Norton, Timothy M.; Arefieva, Maria Subject: Government Affairs and Weather Mark: I would like to schedule a meeting with your group and Government Affairs. As I'm sure Tim has told you, we have devoted a significant amount of time over the past few months on projects designed to promote Weather products: State-by-state matrix: Masha has put together a state-by-state summary of regulatory / utility activity with respect to hedging in general, and weather hedging specifically. This matrix shows the mindset of the regulators and utilities for each of the states. Are regulators encouraging hedging? are they allowing passthrough of costs? are they addressing weather in any fashion? You'll find the answers to these questions - and more - in Masha's matrix. This will hopefully help you to target and prioritize origination opportunities. Risk Management White Paper: Government Affairs has developed a "white paper" which talks about the benefits of hedging and risk management, which we will use in the states to advocate market-based solutions to price and weather risk management. Georgia Power Case: Harry Kingerski and I will be developing testimony in the Georgia Power case which will recommend that the Commission reject Georgia Power's performance-based weather proposal, and will advocate that the Commission require Georgia Power to utilize weather derivative products provided by Enron and others. Our hope is that we will create a precedent for these types of products in other states as well. We would like to meet with your group to walk through each of these projects, and to help identify origination opportunities with LDCs and electric utilities. Let me know what works for you and your team. Thanks, Lisa
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Jamie resent the email, there must be a problem with her distribution list. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]@ENRON On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:46 AM To: [email protected]; Spraggins, Gary; Linhart, Joe; [email protected]; Janzen, Randy; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris Subject: Lamar Nominations (Feb 21) Attached is the NNG Lamar burn schedule for February 21, 2002. At this time we plan on 60,000. Thanks Jamie Schnorf - FPL 561-625-7032 (See attached file: 0202 NNG Lamar Nomination.xls) - 0202 NNG Lamar Nomination.xls
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
As you know, we are continuously updating the Foreign & Domestic Counsel database so that it can be maintained in the most accurate form; therefore, any new information you may have regarding outside counsel firms that have been interviewed and/or retained in the past 12 months would be greatly appreciated. Also, if you have any updates to the existing database entries we would also like to hear from you. Please take the time to help us update this database so it can be a valuable tool for all of us! Each one of us has full access to the database via your Lotus Notes application; however, if your icon has disappeared from your desktop, click on the link below to add it back on to your desktop. We are also looking for any firms that have been either interviewed or have signed an Engagement Letter with us. Please provide any new information and/or updates either to Nony Flores or Becky Spencer. Thank you for your attention to this matter. <Embedded StdOleLink>
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Stinson, He is looking for blanket approach to our disk, both read and write. Is it legitimate? Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 03:35 PM --------------------------- [email protected] on 11/20/2000 02:37:25 PM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Request Submitted: Access Request for [email protected] You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000007876&Page= Approval to review and act upon this request. Request ID : 000000000007876 Approver : [email protected] Request Create Date : 11/20/00 2:36:29 PM Requested For : [email protected] Resource Name : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write] Resource Type : Directory
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Mark: Based on our discussion, let me know if you concur with the draft chart below: CHART FOR TRADING CONTRACT CONFIRMATIONS BETWEEN TWO U.S. COUNTERPARTIES, AS OF 10/1/00 Type of Trade Contract Formation Method Trade Confirmation required to be sent? If yes, get signed by CP? Physical (w/ no Master) Phone Yes, but can be electronic No, unless commodity not "good" On-line No N/A Physical (w/ Master) Phone Yes, but can be electronic No On-line No, unless Master requires No Financial (w/ no Master) Phone Yes, but can be electronic Yes, unless NY law governs On-line No N/A Financial (w/ Master) Phone Yes, but can be electronic Yes, unless NY law governs On-line No, unless Master requires No In summary, as a result of the new U.S. federal legislation on e-signatures and contracts, on-line trades between two U.S. counterparties would not legally require the sending of a paper or electronic trade confirmation after the electronic contract is formed on-line unless expressly required by the applicable master trading agreement. An electronic confirmation, of course, could be sent if the counterparty elects to receive one. We agreed to obtain a legal opinion from outside counsel to confirm this conclusion. Regards, Alan
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
- pressrelease.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Prof. Peter Tufano Harvard Business School Morgan Hall 377 Soldiers Field Boston, Massachusetts 02163 Phone: (617) 495-6855 Fax: (617) 496-6592 Email: [email protected] http://www.people.hbs.edu/ptufano
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 01:26 PM --------------------------- "Glover, Rusty" <[email protected]> on 02/23/2001 12:46:11 PM To: "JENNIFER (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "KAK (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "SHELLEY (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "DAREN (E-mail)" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: FW: Contemporary Poetry -----Original Message----- From: Paul Billingsly [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 12:49 PM To: Ward; Tim Pyles; Tim & Vynetta Ryan; Stephen Wilson; Selman; Scott Starnes; Rusty Glover; Ron Moore; Romberger; Robert Canright; Richard Beasley; Quentin Mimms; Randall Bean; Monte and Jennifer Mann; Mike Berryman; Michael Willoughby; Michael Dixon; Matt Oualline; Kellly Parker; John Jordan; John Hendry; Jeff Weyandt; Jeff Mileger; Jack Mimms; Hopkins, Rockwell; Gary Calvert; FRED RAINES; Fagen; Kent Smith; MIKE_D_P; Palmer Weyandt; Roy Hale; Eddie Herring; david w cathey; David Ashmore; Dan Holcomb; Alan Carson Subject: Contemporary Poetry Guys, Just thought you might find this interesting.? I was forwarded this poem, and told it was written by a high school student in Az. Regardless, of who/where (not the point) I find it interesting, weirdly amusing, and frighteningly fairly accurate.- PB Now I sit me down in school Where praying is against the rule For this great nation under God Finds mention of Him very odd. If Scripture now the class recites, It violates the Bill of Rights. And anytime my head I bow Becomes a Federal matter now. Our hair can be purple, orange or green, That's no offense, it's a freedom scene. The law is specific, the law is precise. Prayers spoken aloud are a serious vice. For praying in a public hall Might offend someone with no faith at all. In silence alone we must meditate, God's name is prohibited by the state. We're allowed to cuss and dress like freaks, And pierce our noses, tongues and cheeks. They've outlawed guns, but FIRST the Bible. To quote the Good Book makes me liable. We can elect a pregnant Senior Queen, And the 'unwed daddy,' our Senior King. It's "inappropriate" to teach right from wrong, We're taught that such "judgments" do not belong. We can get our condoms and birth controls, Study witchcraft, vampires and totem poles. But the Ten Commandments are not allowed, No word of God must reach this crowd. It's scary here I must confess, When chaos reigns the school's a mess. So, Lord, this silent plea I make, Should I be shot; My soul please take! New Contact Numbers: Paul Billingsly [email protected] O. 972/396-1002 F.? 972/396-1954 M. 214/878-8767 475 W. Blondy Jhune Lucas, Texas? 75002 ? - Paul Billingsly.vcf
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 07/13/2001 05:36 PM ----- Donna Fulton 07/13/2001 02:47 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/Enron@EnronXGate, Rogers Herndon/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike Carson/Enron@EnronXGate, John M Forney/Enron@EnronXGate, Laura Podurgiel/Enron@EnronXGate, Gretchen Lotz/Enron@EnronXGate, Juan Hernandez/Enron@EnronXGate, Miguel L Garcia/Enron@EnronXGate, Rudy Acevedo/Enron@EnronXGate, Heather Kroll/Enron@EnronXGate, David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Johnston/Enron@EnronXGate, Bill Rust/Enron@EnronXGate, Edward D Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Terri Clynes/Enron@EnronXGate, Oscar Dalton/Enron@EnronXGate, Doug Sewell/Enron@EnronXGate, Larry Valderrama/Enron@EnronXGate, Nick Politis/Enron@EnronXGate, Fletcher J Sturm/Enron@EnronXGate, Chris Dorland/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff King/Enron@EnronXGate, John Kinser/Enron@EnronXGate, Matt Lorenz/Enron@EnronXGate, Patrick Hansen/SA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/Enron@EnronXGate, [email protected], John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Louise Kitchen/Enron@EnronXGate, Greg Whalley/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Subject: RTO Orders - Grid South, SE Trans, SPP and Entergy The Southeast RTO orders are out and have followed through with what we expected from the discussion at the FERC meeting. The SPP and Entergy RTO proposals have been rejected because they fail to satisfy the scope and configuration requirements of Order No. 2000. The Commission notes that the required discussions between SPP and Entergy and its neighboring RTO/TOs has led to no increase in the original scope and configuration. The filings by SPP and Entergy were brief, indicating only a lack of interest by other RTOs or utilities in joining to enlarge scope; they failed to specify any details of the talks, what changes could be made or what could be fixed to accomodate combination with other RTOs. The order states that the Commission favors the development of large, regional transmission organizations reflecting natural markets. The Commission indicates that they favor four RTOs - NE, SE, MW and West. Therefore the order requires the participants in SPP and Entergy to participate in settlement discussions as set out in the mediation order. Note that these meetings will start next Tuesday, July 17 before a FERC ALJ. The Southern Company RTO is also found by the FERC to fail the scope characteristics of Order No. 2000. The order finds that Southern's approach to focus on MOUs and seams issues with its neighbors is inadequate. The order states, "We reiterate: the Commission's goal is to have a single RTO in the Southeast, and to have that single RTO operational as soon as possible." The Commission recognizes that start-up costs in forming a larger RTO may be more, but that over the longer term, large RTOs will foster market development, will provide increased reliability and will result in lower wholesale electricity prices. The order therefore directs the parties to the mediation as stated above. The Grid South participants are also directed to the mediation which is starting on next Tuesday. It is a lengthier order with more details on other aspects of RTOs, including Independent Board requirement, congestion managment, interconnection procedures, planning process and CBM. Therefore, I am attaching a summary of the order. One of the important findings of the order is that GridSouth is not sufficiently independent; the Applicant TOs are making policy decisions that should be made by an independent board. Therefore, the order requires GridSouth to install an independent board and file a compliance filing within 90 days. If anyone wants copies of the orders, let me know.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
514118 was changed to COB. Kerri Thompson@ENRON 02/05/2001 02:41 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: apb checkout sorry 514118 Kate Symes @ ECT 02/05/2001 04:31 PM To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: apb checkout 513386 has been changed. 514418 - no such deal. Kerri Thompson@ENRON 02/05/2001 02:30 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: apb checkout 513386 should be apb 514418 broker has cob
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
OK -----Original Message----- From: Lavorato, John Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 10:27 AM To: Kitchen, Louise Subject: Presto continues to push good people away. This is your Marcello problem. Make sure Kevin takes Zipper. Its a good fit.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Tanya/Jay, I am forwarding to you documentation from Westport Resources Corporation regarding the merger with Belco Oil & Gas. As you know, we have existing financial agreements with both companies, as identified below: Belco Oil & Gas - Master Energy Price Swap Agreement dated July 8, 1999, which has unlimited credit Westport Oil & Gas Company, Inc. - ISDA Master Agreement dated March 17, 1998 The Counterparty wants to retain the Belco Master. Please let me know what Credit wants to do. Stephanie
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Thanks for the copy of the draft Agreements. Do you have a Local Currency - Single Jurisdiction version of this agreement? Since this is a single, one time transaction that would be a better agreement for us. Thanks
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
fyi- rick -----Original Message----- From: Jackson, Jeffrey Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:30 PM To: EWS DPR@ENRON Subject: EWS DPR Sensitivity: Confidential <Embedded Picture (Metafile)> <Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Please see attached. Also, I need to speak with you about brokerage business - it's exceeding swap/derivative work. Sara
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Well, we have a slight problem. Mark has just replied to my memo and he will not be in Houston on that date. Could we make it for August 28, 2000 ? Thanks, Kay 3-0643 Enron North America Corp. From: David W Delainey 07/12/2000 03:40 PM Sent by: Kay Chapman To: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Venita Coleman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect Subject: QBR HPL/LRC/Upstream Origination Dave and Mark have asked me to arrange a meeting, QBR HPL/LRC/Upstream Origination, and I would like to know if August 22, 2000 from 1:00 - 5:00 pm will work for all of you? Thank you in advance for your promt attention to this matter. Thanks, Kay 3-0643
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
yes ---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 07/14/2000 02:31 PM --------------------------- Richard Tomaski@ENRON 07/14/2000 08:22 AM To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: EOL - Park & Loan Transaction Hunter, Did you take care of this? ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Tomaski/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000 08:22 AM --------------------------- From: Stephanie Sever@ECT on 07/12/2000 05:11 PM To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Tomaski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: EOL - Park & Loan Transaction Please let me know the names of the internal traders who will need execute rights to the new Park & Loan transaction. Hunter, Are you going to want a separate risk book for these transactions and will we want this set up on EOL? Thanks for your help. Stephanie x33465
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I would like to request a temporary increase of the Natural Gas var limit for the next 10 business days. I suggest Natural Gas Trading's limit increase to 45 Million limit from the current 40 Million limit. The floor is very bullish and we don't want to take off our West Basis positions which are eating up a lot of var. Please advise.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I left Bruce a message offering my assistance. From: Ed B Hearn III@ECT on 07/11/2000 01:49 PM To: Bruce Sukaly/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: "Turbine CA" Bruce: I'm unfamiliar with the documents you've requested (turbine/site guarantee). I think you'll have a much faster turn around time if you contact Kay Mann. Kay is our resident turbine expert, so you should benefit greatly from her assistance. Thanks, Ed
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dan-- I'm forwarding these comments to the Mortgage Agreement from Quantum for your review. I'm not very familiar with Mortgage/credit - type issues, but let's discuss our responses at your convenience. Thx D ---------------------- Forwarded by Dan J Bump/DEN/ECT on 01/25/2000 02:22 PM --------------------------- Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: Doug Garrett <[email protected]> 01/25/2000 12:43 PM To: Dan J Bump/DEN/ECT@Enron cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Subject: Bonepile: WHGGS Mortgage Dan, Per our discussion this am. Mortage concerns: B. Recitals: we want to make clear that the term loan amount can be "up to" $750,000 as opposed to "is" $750,000. 1.1: Mortgagors need to be defined as all working interest owners in the leases and not the royalty or overriding royalty owners. Also stipulate that ownership of the Wellhead Gas Gathering System (WHGGS) ownership is identical to the leasehold working interest ownership. Here again Quantum will need to sign on behalf of itself and as agent for its program investors. EOW will sign for itself. The nonworking interest owners will also need to sign for themselves. 1.2.b: Again stipulate that RI and ORRI owners not subject to mortgage or that all leasehold working interest owners are bound. 2.1: Mortgagee would be the assignee in this provision. We need clarification on the ramifications of the assignment being absolute. 2.4: No duty of Mortgagee to produce rents is too much control to give Mortgagee even in theory. 3.1: Stipulate that lien affects only leasehold working interest owners. 5.5.1: Again mortgagor needs to be well defined. 5.1.(b): Enernet of Wyoming (EOW) has granted a mortgage to secure the operations bond required by the Wyoming Office of State Lands and Investments in the amount of $10,000. This mortgage is a permitted exception hereto. EOW has also file of record AAPL Model Form 610RS-1989 Recording Supplement to the JOA and Financing Statement in the ordinary course of business. 5.4: The loss threshhold should probably need to be increased in light of the funding amount involved. 7.3: The personal liability language referenced in this provision appears inconsistent with the in rem nature of the mortage and therefore out of place. Dan, let me know when we can talk with you and/or your counsel on these matters. Thanks, Doug
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Steve/Lara - this is the senate bill we discussed with George Foote. I had some discussions w/ Sen. Wyden about this last session and I think we should be on board to support it next Congress. NARUC's ROWE VOICES `PERSONAL SUPPORT' FOR BROADBAND TAX CREDIT BILL National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) President Bob Rowe has expressed his "personal support" for a Senate bill to establish a five-year, two-tier tax credit plan to encourage telecom carrier investments in broadband services equipment. Mr. Rowe also is a member of the Montana Public Service Commission. Writing today to President Clinton and three top U.S. senators, Mr. Rowe said the Broadband Internet Access Act, S 2698, is consistent with a broadband services resolution adopted by NARUC's Executive Board during the association's meetings in Los Angeles last summer (TR, July 24). He noted that "the resolution states that NARUC generally supports legislation that encourages the deployment of broadband technology and advanced services to underserved areas without removing the market-opening incentives contained in section 271 of the Telecommunications Act." "I believe [the] legislation is consistent with the view that while the 1996 Act is generally working, additional incentives to serve certain rural or urban communities are appropriate," he said in letters to President Clinton, Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R., Miss.), Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee Chairman John McCain (R., Ariz.), and Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D., N.Y.), the author of S 2698.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Did you say you were missing a phone? I may have an extra one for sale - CHEAP TOO! I made a bunch of 1-900 calls on it last night. Newphew called me at 12:00 ish and showed up around 12:45. I'm tuckered.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
John, I'm an analyst in the Generation Investments group, and we spoke regarding the Navy Yard transport curves about a month ago. I am assuming there is probably no change in the applicable transport curves, but I just wanted to verify that there are no updates. I have attached our past letters of correspondence regarding your suggestions for marking our transport expenses for the project. Thanks, Greg Ying Liu@ENRON 03/07/2001 08:59 AM To: Greg Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Brooklyn Navy Yard Project Transportation Curves Request ---------------------- Forwarded by Ying Liu/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 09:05 AM --------------------------- John Hodge 03/05/2001 01:33 PM To: Ying Liu/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Brooklyn Navy Yard Project Transportation Curves Request Attached is a spreadsheet that details the transportation charges that you requested. I recommend escalating the Iroquois and Transco charges in the same way as was done previously. Escalate 18% of the Iroquois rates at the GDP inflator and 36% of the Transco rates. This will take into account the pipeline's O&M cost increases. TCPL is a different case. Since we last looked at the Brooklyn Naval Yard assets, TransCanada has negotiated a settlement with its customers. These are the rates that begin in 1/1/2002 on the spreadsheet. However, TCPL is experiencing an inordinate amount of capacity turnback. As their customer's contracts expire, the customers are not renewing. This shoves their rate base on fewer and fewer customers and should increase their rates more quickly. The next large customer turnback should occur in 2003. For this reason, I recommend escalating TCPL's rates by 20% in 2003 and then escalating the entire rate by the GDP in the future. This should not only take into account the capacity turnback, but also consider the escalation in O&M costs. Call me if you have any questions. Ying Liu 03/01/2001 11:54 AM To: John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Brooklyn Navy Yard Project Transportation Curves Request Hi, John, Following up my phone call, I am sending a list of curve requests for you on the BNY project: Base Year: 2001 1. Trans Canada: Demand Charges Variable Charges Fuel Requirement Estimation of Trariff escalation 2. Iroquois: Demand Charges Variable Charges Fuel Requirement Estimation of Trariff escalation 3. Transco Z1 - Z6: Demand Charges Variable Charges Fuel Requirement Estimation of Trariff escalation On the Tariff escalation part, based on your inputs, we used 22%, 18%, and 36% of GDP inflation for TransCanada, Iroquois and Transco, respectively. Also, you estimated % increase in Transco Tariff from 2001 to 2007. Thanks a lot for your help! Ying X57350
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Per his request, we weren't able to video Gary Hamel's presentation at the Management Conference. However, he was kind enough though to send along his PowerPoint presentation -- I understand that he doesn't typically do this. I thought you would like to have it for your files. Take care, Terrie James Sr. Director, Corporate Communication Enron Broadband Services 713-853-7727 (phone) 713-646-8887 (fax) [email protected] ----- Forwarded by Terrie James/Enron Communications on 12/06/00 05:09 AM ----- [email protected] 12/05/00 01:43 PM To: Terrie James/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: Subject: Gary Hamel's slide set Hello Terrie, I understand you were hoping to get a copy of Gary Hamel's Powerpoint slide presentation. It is attached. Our apologies that it took so long! Best to you, Grace 650.851.2095
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I am hoping (bearing in mind internet issues) to move house over the next week and then spend some time ski-ing. I will be available on my mobile throughout: Mobile 01144 378 757656 Home 713 467 5506 Ski-ing (from 19th) 1 970 728 6800 (The Peaks Resort) Dave Forster is in charge 3 - 1861 or mobile 011447867550598 Louise
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
If you haven't paid your dues by Sunday you will begin to forfeit. Total dues are $140.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
pls follow up on this. I can't remember if I've rsvpd or not. thanks. df ---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 04/02/2001 11:54 AM --------------------------- From: Sara Davidson/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/02/2001 09:19 AM To: Kevin Altit/BRZ/AZURIX@Azurix, Stephen Brooke/NA/AZURIX@AZURIX, Allan Conge/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Ray Alvarez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Susan T Covino/HOU/EES@EES, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard DiMichele/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Anthony Duenner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James A Hughes/ENRON@enronXgate, Cristina Juvier/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sean Long/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate, Rockford Meyer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kim Monk/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phil Patman/HOU/EES@EES, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Sinclair/EU/Enron@Enron, Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen E Magruder/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected]@SMTP@enronXgate, Denise Ernest/ENRON@enronXgate, Peggy Menchaca/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Sanford/ENRON@enronXgate, Kim Collins/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Dalton/HOU/EES@EES, Elisa Donovan/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Freed/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Hillegonds/HOU/EES@EES, Allison McHenry/HOU/EES@EES, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Denise Almoina/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maria Pia Beccaccini/SA/Enron@Enron, Vicky Martinez/SA/Enron@Enron, Paula Porto/SA/Enron@Enron, Fabian Valle/SA/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Alan Black/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary Nell Browning/LON/ECT@ECT, Jon Chapman/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Adam Duguid/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT, Sarah Gregory/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen C Hands/ETOL/EU/Enron@ENRON, Paul Johnson/ENRON@enronxgate, Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron, Sophie Martin/EU/Enron@Enron, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Traung/EU/Enron@Enron, Tim Underdown/Stockton/TS/ECT@ECT, Marcus Von Bock Und Polach/LON/ECT@ECT, Christopher Wood/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT, Janet Wood/EU/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Piyush Joshi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle Blaine/ENRON@enronXgate, David Grant/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeanine DeNicola/HOU/EES@EES, Eva Neufeld/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, LEE MARTIN/ENRON@enronxgate, Jeffrey K Fischer/HOU/EES@EES, Annette Glod/ENRON@enronXgate, Rick Hopkinson/ENRON@enronXgate, Tony Jarrett/ENRON@enronXgate, Tina Livingston/ENRON@enronXgate, James MacCallon/ENRON@enronXgate, Davis Maxey/ENRON@enronXgate, Preston McGlory/ENRON@enronXgate, Victor Nieto/ENRON@enronXgate, Leesa White/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Adam Umanoff/EWC/Enron@ENRON cc: Tracy Foy/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Submit Your Law Conference RSVP Form Enron Law Conference Reminder Submit your Online RSVP Form NOW! If you have received this e-mail, then your RSVP Form has NOT been received! Space is limited, so please go to http://lawconference.corp.enron.com and fill out your Online RSVP Form NOW -- whether you are attending or not. (Don't forget to respond if you will be attending the Thursday night awards dinner as well). Once you have submitted your RSVP Form, you should receive a confirmation e-mail. Please review your confirmation information and let me know if there are any changes. See you in San Antonio!
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!! Debra Perlingiere Enron North America Corp. Legal Department 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885 Houston, Texas 77002 [email protected] Phone 713-853-7658 Fax 713-646-3490
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Today we released additional information about our related party and off-balance sheet transactions. We have made this information available both on our website and in a Form 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information provides further details about: -- the $1.2 billion charge to shareholders' equity announced in the third quarter and the transactions related to that charge; -- a restatement of prior years' financial statements to reflect this reduction in shareholders' equity, the consolidation of three entities and prior year proposed audit adjustments and reclassifications; -- the Special Committee appointed by the Enron Board of Directors to review transactions between Enron and related parties; -- the LJM limited partnerships, including a discussion of transactions between Enron and LJM entities; and -- transactions between Enron and other Enron employees. This information addresses a number of concerns that have been raised by our shareholders and the SEC. As our Board's new Special Committee continues its review of various matters, we will continue to cooperate fully with the SEC in its investigation, and we will continue to respond to investor requests so that they can evaluate, appreciate and appropriately value the strength of our core businesses. Restatement of Earnings Based on information that we have recently obtained, Enron and its auditors determined that certain off-balance sheet entities should have been included in Enron's consolidated financial statements pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, Enron will restate its financial statements from 1997 to 2000 and for the first and second quarters of 2001. These restatements have no material effect on Enron's current financial position. Here are some details included in the filing: Net income for each period will be impacted by the retroactive consolidation of Joint Energy Development Investments (JEDI) and Chewco beginning in November 1997, the consolidation of an LJM1 subsidiary for 1999 and 2000 and prior year proposed audit adjustments. Enron's current assessment indicates that the restatement will include: -- a reduction of approximately $96 million in 1997 -- a reduction of approximately $113 million in 1998 -- a reduction of approximately $250 million in 1999 -- a reduction of approximately $132 million in 2000 -- an increase of approximately $17 million for the first quarter of 2001 -- an increase of approximately $5 million for the second quarter of 2001 -- a reduction of $17 million for the third quarter of 2001. The consolidation of JEDI and Chewco also will increase Enron's debt by approximately $711 million in 1997, $561 million in 1998, $685 million in 1999 and $628 million in 2000. The restatement will have no material impact on Enron's reported earnings for the nine-month period ending September 2001. You can obtain more detailed information on the items described above by accessing the Form 8-K filing at <http://www.enron.com/corp/sec/>. We will continue to review our strategic, operational and financial position, and we will continue to keep you updated on any developments.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
HERE'S A DRAFT OF THE EXNET PRESENTATION. I'LL KEEP LOOKING FOR THE FINAL VERSION. ----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 07/09/2001 01:42 PM ----- From: Jeff Dasovich on 01/26/2001 12:22 PM Sent by: Jeff Dasovich To: [email protected], Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Please Take a Look--Draft Slides for Monday Talk in New York on California Crisis I've still got considerable work to do, but wanted to make sure all had a chance to review and comment well in advance of finalizing. I'm giving a talk at Exnet on Monday about California. Attached is a draft of the slides. All comments welcome and appreciated. I'm continuing to work on it. Thanks very much. Best, Jeff
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi John, I am sending out by courier today your guarantee offer. Regarding the repairs that need to be done on your property, I will coordinate them with you agent and the cost of the repairs will be deducted from your equity. I will send you a copy of the bills once we receive them to let you know how much will be deducted. Best regards, Patricia
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
As requested. The supervisor form should be signed by Delaney and I will get David to sign. Please complete to the best of your ability. If anything is missing, we can follow-up with HR. Jane
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
PhotoWorks <http://www.photoworks.com/images/emails/11-5_123/123_B_hdr_01.gif> Take $3 off your next processing order <http://www.photoworks.com/images/emails/11-5_123/123_B_hdr_02.jpg> Take $3 off your next processing order <http://www.photoworks.com/images/emails/11-5_123/123_B_hdr_03.jpg> Take $3 off your next processing order <http://www.photoworks.com/images/emails/11-5_123/123_B_hdr_04.gif> Take $3 off your next processing order <http://www.photoworks.com/images/emails/11-5_123/123_B_hdr_05.jpg> <http://www.photoworks.com/images/blank.gif> We recently sent you a coupon for $3 off your next film processing order. We hope you took advantage of this money-saving offer. If not, here's another coupon for $3 off, just for giving us another try. (If you already redeemed the previous coupon, feel free to use this new coupon, too!) Remember, PhotoWorks promises top-quality prints plus we automatically scan and archive your photos online, where you can e-mail them, create online albums, and more! <http://www.photoworks.com/images/blank.gif> $3 off your next order <http://www.photoworks.com/images/emails/2-19_123/219_coupon_P517.gif> <http://www.photoworks.com/images/blank.gif> $3 Off On Your Next Order! Print out this coupon and send it with your next roll of film, single-use or preloaded camera, to save $3 on your order. Hurry! Offer expires 05/12/02. *If you are unable to print the coupon, just write the coupon code 'P517' on your order form. <http://www.photoworks.com/images/blank.gif> <http://www.photoworks.com/images/blank.gif> <http://www.photoworks.com/images/blank.gif> <http://www.photoworks.com/images/blank.gif> <http://www.photoworks.com/images/blank.gif> Customer # 39188175 Customer Service Links print order forms & mailing labels <http://www.photoworks.com/photoworks/orderforms/default.asp> | check status of order <http://www.photoworks.com/support/default.asp> | help <http://www.photoworks.com/support/default.asp> To change your address, e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Copyright ? 2002 PhotoWorks Inc. If you would no longer like to receive PhotoWorks promotional emails, click here <mailto:[email protected]> and then click 'send' on the email that appears. If you have any questions about PhotoWorks? Online Privacy Policy, please click here. <http://photoworks.com/support/privacypolicy.asp> <http://www.photoworks.com/images/blank.gif>
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
letter w presto changes and 1 typo ( see earlier email)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Mark: Here's the other email. I have not yet received the NDA. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) [email protected] ----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001 05:49 PM ----- Chris Constantine 01/12/2001 11:07 AM To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: NDA agreement Sara, We are going to receive an NDA form from W-Technologies to sign and return to them. I will forward it to you when it arrives. They are asking me what company name to put on the form. I work for Enron Net Works and my user is Gary Hickerson so can you please let me know what to tell them. Regards, Chris
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
as a desk that has generated a tremendous amount of cash over the last couple of years and holds vastly more margin from its counterparties than our counterparties are holding of ours, how does this policy change impact us? i have asked this question every six months for the last two years and the answer has typically been that it is too hard to implement. with respect to capital, the west power desk has been subsidizing other parts of ena for a while.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Katja, RISK magazine has the copyright. You have to contact them to get the permission to use this for external users. You can contact: Sh?n Millie Risk Books 28-29 Haymarket London SW1Y 4RX Pone: 44 (0)171 484 9740 Fax : 44 (0)171 484 9758 e-mail: [email protected] www.riskpublications.com and discuss the legal aspects with her. Vince Vasant Shanbhogue 01/06/2000 08:28 AM To: Katja Schilling/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Credit Article I do not think minor changes would allow you to just use the same file. You will have to check with Risk. This is Risk Books, a specialist division of Risk Publications in London. Address: Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX. The publication was in a book, entitled "Credit Derivatives: Applications for Risk Management, Investment and Portfolio Optimisation," publishd in 1998. I am not sure if a lawyer was involved, maybe Vince will know. Vasant Katja Schilling 01/05/2000 05:47 AM To: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bijoya Banerjea/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Credit Article Hello Vasant! Bijoya has updated me on the discussion you have been having on the article from Risk Magazine about Credit. We have found that the attachments you sent her are actually not word-for-word the same as the published version we have - the changes are only minor, wever, and have not altered the article in any way. My question now concerns the copyrights. Since the version you sent is slightly different, do you think this gives us the freedom to publish it without the consent of Risk? And if not - can you tell me if it was published by Risk UK or Risk in the States? And which issue was it? I just want to have all of the details if I need to call someone at the magazine ... Also - was there a lawyer involved in the publication procedure, or was this handled by London/Houston PR? Or by Vince himself? Sorry about all of the questions ... I just want to avoid problems well in advance. Thank you! Regards, Katja
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Yes, and as a matter of fact...I'd called the Benefits Help Line recently and they'd said "No Coverage" on Dental. I think I am all set. If you find out otherwise, let me know! Thanks. Ginger McCain 06/30/2000 09:56 AM To: Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Dental Coverage Please confirm that you changed your Dental election to No Coverage. I recall a phone conversation, however, need definite clarification. Thank you, Ginger McCain
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
What are you doing on Labor Day? In between the hamburgers, hotdogs, homemade ice cream and occasional dip in the pool that many of you will undoubtedly be enjoying Monday, be sure to take a few minutes to turn your TV set to the Jerry Lewis Labor Day Muscular Dystrophy (MDA) Telethon on NBC. At 1:10 p.m., Enron's own Linda Jenkins will present a $100,000 check to Jerry's Houston team. The donation, which will benefit research for ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease -- the disease Linda has been living with for the past three years), was raised by devoted friends and volunteers at the Enron/MDA Beach Bowl held in July. Thanks to all of you who raised money for this cause that is close to our hearts at Enron. And have a happy and safe holiday.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I assume that granting access for someone for whom Lorraine Becker is the supervisor should be approved by you. I get hundreds of these, many for employees outside Energy Operations. Thanks. --Sally ---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 04:14 PM --------------------------- From: Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT Subject: Your approval is requested Security Resource Request System Application Approval Please review and act upon this request. You have received this eMail because you are listed as an approver on the original request. Instructions For: Beth Cowan Request Original: Application Name: EOL - Other (US) Request Type: Grant Role(s): Comments: For marketing company Review the request in the Request section at left. For more information regarding who the request is for, do the following: Click on the name for PeopleFinder info See the Further Information section below In the Approval Section, select Approve or Reject, enter comments as necessary and click [Submit]. Further Information Requestor: Beth Cowan Manager: Lorraine Becker Request Date: 05/26/2000 12:46:08 PM RC #: 2172 WO #: Company #: 413 Priority: Normal General Comments:
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
robin barbie, i dont think so, should be back monday, why? -----Original Message----- From: Hayden, Frank Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:16 PM To: Parks, Joe Subject: RE: Permanently? -----Original Message----- From: Parks, Joe Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:16 PM To: Hayden, Frank Subject: RE: i think she has gone home. -----Original Message----- From: Hayden, Frank Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:04 PM To: Parks, Joe Subject: RE: Still shoveling. How are you? Is Barbe down there? -----Original Message----- From: Parks, Joe Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:49 PM To: Hayden, Frank Subject: yo, how are things going
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
IMPORTANT NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS Due to new postal regulations, all mail addressed to: Jodie L. Jiles and/or Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. must include the following: 5 Post Oak Park Building 4400 Post Oak Parkway, Suite 1970 Houston, TX 77027 If you have any questions, please call (713) 960-1179. - C.DTF *********************************************************************** Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer account or account activity contained in this communication. ***********************************************************************
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
<B>POWER MARKETS 2002: <br>Risk and Reward</B> (<B>April 17-18, 2002 Las Vegas, NV</B>) Sponsored by <B>The Power Marketing Association</B><br>Download Brochure at: <a href="http://www.pmaconference.com/markets2002.pdf">http://www.pmaconference.com/markets2002.pdf</A> <B>Attend the Power Marketing Association's Seventh Annual Spring Conference: Power Markets 2002: Risk and Reward, April 17-18, 2002, at the Excalibur Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada.</B><p> We will see record numbers of new powerplants coming on line this year. New, much larger RTOs promise dramatic increases in liquidity. The Enron fallout will continue to force balance sheet improvements-- perhaps more mergers and acquisitions. Price volatility will continue, and risk management techniques will continue to be honed. <p> Come hear the experts who will help you survive and thrive in 2002! Topics <B>Transmission and RTOs:</B> Representatives from PJM, Cal ISO and Midwest ISO on their respective regions.<p> <B>Credit:</B> Susan Abbott of Moody's on evolving credit standards in our industry<p> <B>Insurance:</B> Scott Ettien from NCM, Lynda Clemmons from Element Re and Pat Toner Goudarzi from ACE, on Credit Insurance, Weather-risk Insurance and Innovative Insurance Products, respectively<p> <B>Exchanges:</B> Monte SImpson of InterContinental Exchange and Brad Leach of NYMEX on the growth in the use of exchanges.<p> <B>Markets:</B> Chris Pollatos of Mirant, Dave Freeman of Panda and Mike Young of Aquila on the state of various aspects of the power markets.<p> <B>And More!</B> Cabell Poindexter of Wyndham Mills on job prospects! John OBrien of Skipping Stone on the outlook for Transmission! Henwood on outlook for powerplant construction! Adrian Palmer of Caminus Corp on European Markets! <B>Fundamentals of Power Marketing.</B> On April 16, Scott Spiewak will be repeating his "Fundamentals of Power Marketing" preconference seminar. Essential for the new industry participant, it is also a valuable overview for the industry professional. Download Brochure at: <a href="http://www.pmaconference.com/markets2002.pdf" >http://www.pmaconference.com/markets2002.pdf</A> The Power Marketing Association PowerMarketers.com ------------------------------------------------ email: [email protected] voice: 201 784 5389 web: http://www.PowerMarketers.com ------------------------------------------------ This email has been sent to [email protected] at your request, by PowerMarketers.com. Visit our Subscription Center to edit your interests or unsubscribe. http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&[email protected] View our privacy policy: http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp Powered by Constant Contact(R) www.constantcontact.com
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Per the request of Mark Taylor, I am forwarding the attached. ---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 02:11 PM --------------------------- Frank L Davis 03/06/2000 02:04 PM To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Tana, Attached below are the documents you requested. Frank
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
This in an automated e-mail sent out from the Commissioner.COM web site. Do not reply to this e-mail, but instead please visit your league's site at http://football.commissioner.com/enron2000 ------------------------------------------------------------- Gary Taylor requests the following transaction:. Drop Elvis Grbac. Add Jake Plummer. ------------------------------------------------------------- To approve this transaction, please go to your web site and select Transactions, Requests in the Front Office.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Effective 9/1/00 deliveries to Eastrans is 30,000 MMBTU/dy The redeliveries will be: 8500 from Fuels Cotton Valley 21500 to PG&E
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Frank, We shall have about 30 people, highly technical (Ph.D., M.S. level). A presentation of 45 minutes would be optimal, assuming you may arrive around 11:45 - 12:00. We shall get the projector for you. Please, keep all the receipts for refund. Vince "Francis X. Diebold" <[email protected]> on 12/18/2000 09:47:16 AM To: [email protected] cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Thursday visit Excellent, Vince! Yes, I will be happy to make a presentation. Do you have a projector to which I could simply hook up my laptop? Could we also have an overhead projector as a backup? Many thanks, Frank P.S. How long is optimal? How large an audience and what are the participants' backgrounds? [email protected] wrote: > Frank, > > We are located at 1400 Smith. Any cab driver can identify the Enron > building. When you arrive, > please, call me at 3-3848 from the reception to be admitted into the > building. > > Alternative phone numbers: 3-5290 (my assistant Shirley Crenshaw). You can > also try to call me on > my cell phone: 713 898 9960. > > The Research Group meeting starts at 11:30 and lasts till 1:00. Can you > make a presentation > about your research projects? What audio/video equipment do you need? What > sandwich would > you like to have for lunch? > > We shall make a hotel reservation for you Thursday night. > > Vince > > "Francis X. Diebold" <[email protected]> on 12/18/2000 07:02:46 AM > > To: Vince Kaminski <[email protected]> > cc: [email protected] > Subject: Thursday visit > > Hi Vince, Looking forward to seeing you Thursday. I arrive at Houston-Bush > on USAir 1769 at 10:55 AM. Please let me know where to go. I also want to > verify that you have booked me a hotel for Thurs night. Many thanks, and > see you soon, Frank > > -- > Francis X. Diebold > WP Carey Professor > > Department of Economics > University of Pennsylvania > 3718 Locust Walk > Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297 > > [email protected] > http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold > > (215) 898-1507 telephone > (215) 573-4217 fax -- Francis X. Diebold WP Carey Professor Department of Economics University of Pennsylvania 3718 Locust Walk Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297 [email protected] http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold (215) 898-1507 telephone (215) 573-4217 fax
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi Everyone I apologize for all the e-mails going back and forth but hopefully we can put this one to rest soon. London Credit have approved this CP for financial metals and I need to confirm if they are approved from a legal perspective as well. I spoke to Justin Boyd (London legal) and he asked that I clear this with Houston Legal before setting them up. In addition, I want to see if Houston Credit/Legal will be reviewing this counterparty for US products as well. Please let me know as soon as you can. Thank You Imelda Frayre ---------------------- Forwarded by Imelda Frayre/LON/ECT on 01/12/2000 09:00 --------------------------- Alan Jamieson@ENRON 30/11/2000 17:55 To: Imelda Frayre/LON/ECT@ECT cc: ECT London Credit, Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: New Counterparty - President & Fellows of Harvard College Approved for financial metal products only with collateral - MGS Code IVY To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, ECT London Credit, Enron Europe Global CounterParty cc: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, EOL Marketing Europe@ECT, Lindsay F Edmonds/EU/Enron@Enron, Hamish M Scutt/EU/Enron@Enron, Diana Higgins/LON/ECT@ECT, Alan Jamieson/EU/Enron@Enron, Britta Dinnendahl/LON/ECT@ECT, Alex Heath/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Brewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Chris Shapland/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: New Counterparty - President & Fellows of Harvard College Hi We've received a PA registration form from President & Fellows of Harvard College for EnronOnline. I've entered the customer details in the customer database (s:/access database). Please review and confirm via return e-mail once approval is completed. Attached is the PA registration form for your review. Regards Imelda Frayre ---------------------- Forwarded by Imelda Frayre/LON/ECT on 21/11/2000 07:53 --------------------------- London Fax System 20/11/2000 22:07 To: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: New fax received (Likely sender: 713 646 8511). You have received a new fax from 713 646 8511 The image contains 3 page(s).
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 05:27 PM --------------------------- "Btu" <[email protected]> on 02/16/2001 04:44:19 PM To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <> cc: Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report e-mail: [email protected] phone: 732-758-8222 fax: 732-758-8286 - wp021901.pdf
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Another gas item which I had not gotten around to adding to the table yet: Docket No. CP01-106 Response to Kern River Petition for Declaratory Order Due: June 11 (?) Affects the California Emergency Project to add 135 MM/d of capacity approved by FERC on April 6 with an expected in-service date of July 1, 2001. On April 5 SoCal Gas notified Kern River that, pursuant to the terms of a 1989 agreement between them, SoCal Gas was entitled to first rights, and was asserting such rights, on this or any capacity expansions into California on Kern's system. We will support Kern River's petition. Comments are being drafted. SoCal Gas has asked FERC not to approve the shortened comment period of June 11; FERC has not responded yet. From: Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/07/2001 01:03 PM To: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]@SMTP@enronXgate, Phillip K Allen/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Barry Tycholiz/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve C Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: RE: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf. Call Privileged & Confidential Communication Attorney-Client Communication and Attorney Work Product Privileges Asserted Western Wholesale Activities Conference Call - Gas & Power Date: Today and Every Thursday Time: 1:00 pm Pacific, 3:00 pm Central, and 4:00 pm Eastern time, Number: 1-888-271-0949 Participant Code: 936022 In Ray's absence, I am facilitating today's call. The proposed agenda (Item numbers refer to the proceedings document row number): Electric 1. Responses to ISO and CA utility RTO filings due June 19 (item 9a) 2. ATC Complaint - next steps (item 20) 3. RTO Seams Conference 6/19/01 and request to speak due tomorrow 6/8/01 (item 37) 4. ISO withholding of as-bid and OOM price data 5. Generator data requests - (Hatsoe) Gas 6. Response to FERC to Re-Impose Transportation Price Caps (item 36) 7. Quarterly reporting requirements (item 35) 8. Gas-related data requests (item 33)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
EIM's budget meeting with Lay/Whalley/Frevert has been moved from Wednesday, October 24 to Monday, November 5. Kerry Roper sent you an e-mail message today with revised dates for budget reviews. McMahon is out of town today, and Ray Bowen's preference is to push the review of our revised ENW budget for EIM back to Wednesday (tomorrow). I am coordinating with Kent Castleman on this meeting with Ray and will give you an update tomorrow after the meeting with Ray. Kent believes that our current allocations are now acceptable to EIM. They will okay the current EOL allocation, but are also very interested in the revised allocation methodology. Brent has had to unexpectedly drive to Austin this afternoon to lecture to a class at UT - a Rick Causey commitment that Rick asked Brent to fill today. When Brent is back tomorrow we will regroup on the EGM budget with the intent of sign-off from Mike and Jeff by end of day tomorrow or Thursday. Whalley budget update - I reviewed this with Kerry today. I suggested that on the Whalley recap sheet that we footnote that numbers were as of 10/22/01, and represented final agreement on EA charges, and revised charges (subject to final sign-off) for EIM. The footnote should also say final reviews with EES and EGM are expected this week, so ENW charges to those business units are still preliminary. I also suggested to Kerry that we footnote for Whalley the break-out and total (expense and capital) of budget reductions since our review with Whalley 10 days ago. --Sally
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
http://www.weather.com/weather/cities/us_co_alamosa.html
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Shirley, No problem. Vince Shirley Crenshaw 07/24/2000 03:34 PM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Vacation Vince: If it is allright, I would like to take vacation this Thursday, the 27th of June. Thanks! Shirley
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
(See attached file: HPLN1213.xls) - HPLN1213.xls
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Jim, I was on vacation last week. I shall be out Tuesday and Wednesday. What about a call next week? Vince James L Bouillion 02/07/2001 09:32 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jonathan Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Lucas/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: CHARM Conference Call Please let me know what works for you. I have a meeting Monday from 10:00 a.m. through lunch. Please advise. ---------------------- Forwarded by James L Bouillion/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001 07:33 AM --------------------------- "Bertil Olsson" <[email protected]> on 02/06/2001 10:37:21 AM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: CHARM Conference Call Carl and I are both available either Monday 12th or Tuesday 13th. We can do either AM or PM but would prefer AM if possible. Please let me know your preference and I will set it up. Regards, Bertil ______________________________________________________________________ The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, delete any copies held on your systems and notify the sender immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this email for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its content to any other person.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sara, I think the credit issues that I was going to have to address with Russell have been resolved in that it looks like Russell is just going to do a margin call on this counterparty (North Coast Energy). However, I think these issues could come up again with other counterparties, and I think it might be beneficial to have a general meeting with credit to establish some guidelines (especially since there are so many new people in credit). The issue, basically, is alternative ways of gaining comfort if we want to forego a margin call -- the North Coast situation is a good example. North Coast started as a simple ISDA amendment to raise the collateral threshold so that we wouldn't have to margin call. Russell (as he has on another deal) asked to provide that North Coast's substantial debt to its parent company be subordinated to us. As we were considering this arrangement, North Coast's counsel called to tell us that they had just signed up a big bank line that they used to pay off the intercompany debt. He told us that the bank syndicate had also agreed, essentially, to let Enron share secured creditor status with the bank group -- on the same debt priority level -- for up to $5 million on a pari passu basis. But I think Russell felt that North Coast had gotten over leveraged, and so it looks like he's going to do a margin call. I have tried to impress upon Russell that gaining debt priority -- whether through an intercompany subordination agreement or pursuant to an arrangement described above -- is not a simple thing to effect legally. Obviously, on this particular deal, we've got too much on our plates in-house to spend time reviewing the 82-page loan agreement, negotiating intercreditor documents, and doing due diligence on the liens. I did tell Russell that if North Coast was willing to pay for outside counsel to do this for us, then I would have to ask you or Mark Taylor if we could go this route (we never made this offer to the counterparty). It seems to me that there is a lot of potential for these situations to come up again. I would think that the rise in gas prices has resulted in a lot of exposures, and for business relationship purposes, we like to consider alternatives to margin call if the counterparty can come up with another way to give us comfort (this afternoon I got a call from one of our marketers who was rather irate about the North Coast margin call). If we are going to be considering alternatives like subordination or secured creditor status, I think it would be a good idea if we impressed upon everybody in credit that these arrangements are not achieved as easily as they are conceived, and that they will have to engage in a bit of cost-benefit analysis, and consider the logistics involved, before agreeing to these arrangements. Let me know what you think. -- Bob Robert E. Bruce Senior Counsel Enron North America Corp. T (713) 345-7780 F (713) 646-3393 [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Bill - apologize for missing our meeting yesterday. Please give me a call first thing to go over Bengalla and Drummond. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Bradford, William S. Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 10:38 AM To: Mcclellan, George Cc: Suttle, John Subject: RE: Coal Deals George, I would be happy to discuss with you. It remains critical that we manage all cash requirements as our access to capital markets has been impacted over the past few weeks. Hopefully the announcement on Friday will improve our ability to execute transactions like this in future, but prior to Friday this was a necessary precaution. Unfortunately, you are working at a different company than you were a few weeks ago. We can discuss next week. Bill -----Original Message----- From: Mcclellan, George Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:51 PM To: Suttle, John; Peters, Jez; Staley, Stuart; Miyai, Tark; Bauer, Adam; Nimmo, Matthew; Bradford, William S. Subject: RE: Coal Deals John / Bill - talk with me in Houston on Monday - we ain't operating like this. George -----Original Message----- From: Suttle, John Sent: Fri 11/9/2001 12:36 PM To: Peters, Jez; Staley, Stuart; Miyai, Tark; Bauer, Adam; Nimmo, Matthew; Bradford, William S. Cc: Mcclellan, George Subject: RE: Coal Deals The Bengalla deal was struck after I had given ECAP notice of the liquidity problems, and more importantly, without any RAC involvement. From a RAC perspective this deal is still unapproved. If an invoice discount facility can be used, or some other means of performing without using Enron capital then you should move forward. If these options are not available, then the issue should either be raised to Louise Kitchen for approval or unwound until the liquidity problems are resolved. John -----Original Message----- From: Peters, Jez Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:17 PM To: Staley, Stuart; Suttle, John; Miyai, Tark; Bauer, Adam; Nimmo, Matthew; Bradford, William S. Cc: Mcclellan, George Subject: RE: Coal Deals needless to say we need some clarification here - Bengalla deal is alreday in forward motion in that coal being delivered to port as of today and we have commitments which we need to source for. Please call. thks Jez -----Original Message----- From: Staley, Stuart Sent: Friday, 9 November 2001 5:54 AM To: Suttle, John; Miyai, Tark; Peters, Jez; Bauer, Adam; Nimmo, Matthew; Bradford, William S. Cc: Mcclellan, George Subject: RE: Coal Deals John: I assume this does not apply to ECTRL business, as we have not been given a reciprocal recommendation for European biz. Can you confirm this? Also, can you clarify what the specific issue is with ECAP that is not an issue with ECTRL? Is this specific to cash flow within Australian entities? Thanks, Stu -----Original Message----- From: Suttle, John Sent: 08 November 2001 17:42 To: Miyai, Tark; Peters, Jez; Staley, Stuart; Bauer, Adam; Nimmo, Matthew; Bradford, William S. Subject: Coal Deals In light of the current situation in Houston, I recommend we wait to finalize any physical coal sourcing or deliveries in the ECAP business. In short, RAC cannot approve any purchase or sale until the liquidity issues are resolved. Hopefully by the end of the week we will know more, have things settled, and business can continue as normal. Please call me if you have any questions. John 281-345-8264
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dear Vince, Thanks for the interview with Enron. I appreciated your time and the conversation that we had together. I really enjoyed my time at Enron and believe that it is the type of company that I would like to work for. More specifically I enjoyed meeting the people in the research group and feel that I could make a contribution and fit in well. I look forward to hearing from you or an Enron representative. Sincerely, Lance
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The attached schedule is for Thursday, May 2. Associated text files have been posted to Sparky. Michael R. Frazier Manager, Load Forecasting Enron Energy Services Office: 713-345-3200 Pager: 877-926-0615 P-mail: [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
California Regulators Back Rate Increase For Utilities * California regulators indicated yesterday that they are willing to raise rates for electric utilities EIX and PCG, following a review of their finances * Hearings to review utilities' financial status in hearings on Dec. 27 and 28 * KEY DATE: January 4, when we expect they will vote to raise rates * We see this action as positive for the utilities, because it reduces the likelihood of insolvency or bankruptcy, although further action is required, in our view * We also see it as positive for our Growth Energy companies. Any reduction in financial pressure on the utilities equates to reduced pressure to re-regulate the wholesale power industry, in our view * The results of the action were in line with our expectation; we recommend investors buy the Growth Energy names on weakness. In particular, we highlight DYN, CPN, NRG, SOE and DUK. <<CA Power Market II 12-22-00.pdf>> Raymond C. Niles Power/Natural Gas Research Salomon Smith Barney (212) 816-2807 [email protected] s - CA Power Market II 12-22-00.pdf
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
TODAY: Today, Charles Payne offers his investment insights on 17 telecom stocks, some of which hold promise, he says, while others will never get back off the ground. In addition, we feature articles on tower stocks and mobile phone companies eyeing the Internet, and in his weekly contribution, "international wires," columnist Ben Mattlin discusses Russian telecom stocks with high analyst ratings. Multexinvestor.com members can also take advantage of a free offer to sign up for research from Morgan Stanley on McLeodUSA (MCLD) (as well as other stocks). ======================== Sponsored by ========================= INTRODUCING Your FREE Stock-Pick Trial! "You need stocks that go up? That's our job!" FREE of bias? Yes. FREE of conflict? Yes. FREE for you today? YES! Now is a GREAT time to be in the market - Join FREE today at http://www.stockpicks3.com ============================================================== Below: --------- - Free sponsored report - Investment ideas - Broker reports ============================================================== Free sponsored report ----------------------------------------- The firm says this telecom play is now played out, and lays out the key investment positive and investment risks inherent in the stock. Register for the firm's free-research trial to access information on this and other stocks. http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=5204848&sid=8&nd=1122 Investment ideas ----------------------------------------- 1. Picks and pans: Telecom favorites and has-beens Charles Payne rates 17 telecom stocks that sank like hot air balloons for their ability to regain altitude or not. By Charles Payne, founder, CEO, and principal analyst, Wall Street Strategies The telecommunications sector's equipment makers has been at the root of all the heartache felt by investors over the last two-years; it represents the bloated inventories and even more bloated valuations; investors thought they were gliding to a land of early retirements, vacation homes and endless toys when the balloon began to lose air (it didn't pop, but behaved more like a hot air balloon that descended faster and faster as it approached a hard landing). Like visionaries in love with a concept, investors are still in love with the telecommunications space and will continue to bet on the balloon recovering altitude and taking flight once more. I agree that some of these balloons will indeed become airborne, but getting them off the ground will be trickier than advertised. Click here to read more: http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=4552&nd=1122 2. Upwards revisions: Better and better Rather than taking the sector as a whole, investors should consider individual opportunities. By Dave Sterman Recessions are something of a double-edged sword for investors. On the one hand, sales growth slows for many of their portfolio companies, taking share prices on a southbound trajectory. But for those with cash to spare, they have a rare chance to buy quality companies at fire sale prices. With that in mind, we went screening for long-term winners in the telecom sector that are now quite cheap. We specifically sought out stocks that are now fairly inexpensive when compared to their historical earnings growth rate. As the accompanying table shows, these stocks have a PEG (price/earnings ratio in relation to earnings growth) of below 0.7. And to make sure that analyst sentiment corroborates the attractive valuation, we insisted these stocks be supported by at least three "strong buy" ratings, and that analysts have raised their ratings over the last three months. Click here to read more: http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=4365&nd=1122 ======================== Sponsored by ========================= Scottrade Rated #1 Broker by Kiplinger's Personal Finance! Trade stocks for $7 at Scottrade! Experience top-rated customer service and support in each of our 140+ offices nationwide! $25,000,000 account protection and NO inactivity fees are two of many reasons why you should apply. Find out more: click here! http://www.scottrade.com/index.asp?supbid=4400 ============================================================== 3. Upside potential: Unusual support looms for tower stocks Debt burdens and zoning laws may seem like unlikely benefits, but there you have it. By Dave Sterman Toss another sector into the telecom rubble. Shares of cell tower operators are hitting new lows and now sell for just a small fraction of their peaks. Curiously, on many levels, the sector is fairly healthy; revenues are strong, and major players have been able to avoid the cutthroat price wars that have characterized the rest of the telecom industry. That apparent disconnect could spell an opportunity for investors with a strong stomach for a long and bumpy ride. These firms are saddled with eye-popping levels of debt, but should soon benefit from a much more rational operating landscape. Weaker players are on the ropes, and their eventual demise will enable the stronger players to get back on their feet as they garner a bigger slice of the pie. Click here to read more: http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=4364&nd=1122 4. International wires: From Russia with love A troika of telecom stocks that are well-positioned for current trends and gaining analyst esteem. BYLINE: Ben Mattlin, equity research columnist When shares of Russian-based telecom companies start earning a measure of analyst esteem, savvy investors owe it to themselves to take a further look. To be sure, these three Russian telcos haven't yet attained analysts' highest rating, but quite surprisingly--and seemingly out of nowhere--each has an average rating better than a neutral 3, and one of them has moved up to an average rating of 2 ("buy"). What gives? Click here to read more: http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=4425&nd=1122 5. Changing directions: Mobile phone makers eye wireless Internet opportunity Companies look past current troubles toward growing the mobile data market by John Filar Atwood, equity research columnist Worsening economic conditions have caused a major strategic shift in the mobile handset industry. The segment's top companies have begun to de-emphasize phone sales and are eyeing the wireless Internet as a key driver of future revenues. It's no surprise given recent industry performance. Third quarter handset shipments were down by 10% over last year. Motorola's (MOT) sales fell by 22% in the quarter, and Ericsson's (ERICY) phone operations have been so damaging to its bottom line that the company finally moved them into a joint venture with Sony (SNE). Click here to read more: http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=4447&nd=1122 ======================== Sponsored by ========================= It's here! The Multex Investor Toolbar Now you can get broker research, quotes, charts and company information from anywhere on the Web. http://www.athoc.com/wis/activate/activate.asp?pid=10279&mktmsg=JA1 ============================================================== Broker reports ----------------------------------------- 1. SPECIAL REPORT: Your daily fiber JDS Uniphase (JDSU), Corvis (CORV), Stratos Lightwave (STLW), ONI Systems (ONIS), and Agere (AGR.A) are some of the companies discussed. CIBC focuses on recent earnings and/or guidance, product developments, and prospects. (6-page report for purchase - $25) http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=25353489&nd=1122 2. EDITOR'S PICK: Telecom carrier trends from an equipment perspective The analysts discuss the future of telecom capex, wireline service fundamentals, data revenue growth/traffic, wireless capex, and Chinese demand. They explain why investors should focus on carrier fundamentals as a precursor to recovery. (7-page report for purchase - $25) http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=25391719&nd=1122 3. PREMIUM REPORT: Do the Bells ring loudly? Robertson Stephens reports on the current state of the nation's 4 regional bell operating companies. A collective and individual take on BellSouth (BLS), Verizon (VZ), Qwest (Q), and SBC (SBC) is provided, as well as investment conclusions. Valuation, long-distance, DSL/data service, wireless, and competition are discussed. (80-page report for purchase - $150) http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=25610009&nd=1122 ================================================================ Click here to register at Multex Investor: http://www.multexinvestor.com/registration/regWrapA1Basic.asp Click here for The Telecomm Analyst homepage: http://www.multexinvestor.com/Analysts/HomeTTA.asp If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit: http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here: http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below: http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp ================================================================ To remove yourself from this mailing list, please REPLY to THIS email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. To remove yourself from ALL Multex Investor mailings, including the Daily Update and The Telecomm Analyst, please respond with the words NO EMAIL in the subject line. You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at: http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp Please email your feedback to The Telecomm Analyst, include TTA in the subject line at: [email protected] Please send your questions and comments to: [email protected] Please email advertising inquiries to us at: [email protected] Like a specific article? Now you can send it to a friend with just a click. Check out the send to a friend feature next to each article. To advertise in this e-mail, ASK FOR TTA at: [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dr. Kenneth L. Lay Chairman & C.E.O. Enron Corporation Dear Dr. Lay: As part of CERAWeek 2001, you are cordially invited to participate in the Leadership Circle, an exclusive program for senior executives to be held in Houston, Texas, February 11-16, 2001, in conjunction with CERAWeek 2001 and our 20th annual Executive Conference. The Leadership Circle has become a highlight of our annual conference, bringing together a very high-level, select group of government ministers and energy decision makers for informal discussions as well as substantive presentations on issues of common concern. Our focus this year is energy market turmoil and its effect on investment strategies, regulatory backlash, and industry structure.? We will also discuss the postelection prospects for the economy and US politics. Note that we have extended the program in response to member suggestions and have included recreational activities on Sunday, February 11, and a reception that evening at the unique Paraiso Maravilla in Houston, as well as a special Summit on Energy Supply and Investment on Monday morning. To view the complete program, and for details on sponsorship and registration, please visit our web site at http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/mc.cfm?p=674&c=150. Please reserve your place at Leadership Circle 2001 by returning a completed registration form, which can be found at http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/mc.cfm?p=785&c=150, or by e-mailing your session preferences to CERA Event Registration at [email protected]. You will also receive a copy of the program via regular mail. In the meantime, should you have any questions regarding Leadership Circle participation or sponsorship, please contact Sabrina Wisner, Leadership Circle Manager, at +1 617 441 1339 or [email protected]. We hope that you join us for these timely and lively discussions as the energy industry enters the new millenium. I personally hope to see you at CERAWeek 2001. Yours sincerely, Daniel Yergin Chairman Cambridge Energy Research Associates Should you have trouble reaching the Website using the link above, please go to http://www.cera.com/lcircle/ ****************************************************************************** Our relationship with you is very important to us.? If you wish not to receive future e-mail notifications, please send a reply to this message with "DoNotEmail" as the subject of your message. (mailto:[email protected]?subject=DoNotEmail) ******************************************************************************
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Vince, As a reminder, I am hoping that you can identify a speaker for my class at UT on real options (perhaps you!). I look forward to hearing from you. Jim James S. Dyer Fondren Centennial Chair in Business Department of Management Science and Information Systems CBA 5.202 The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712-1175 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 512-471-5278 Fax: 512-471-0587
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
This gas should be allocated to deal 70499 (Unit Gas Transmission). That point is already on the ticket (under ENA). D Clem Cernosek 12/19/2000 06:04 PM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: HPL Meter #981046 BUTANE PLANT NECHES GAS DIST H Daren: During the period of 9/5/99 thru 9/6/99, the above meter recorded flow of 3,962 Mmbtus. There was no deal at this meter the month prior or after. Currently, Logistics has these volumes recorded to HPL Strangers Gas Contract. In order to correct this, HPL Logistics needs either a deal to record these volumes which have flowed into HPL's pipeline or Logistics needs approval to writeoff these volumes to Unaccounted for Gas. (Please print, sign, and return the original to Clem Cernosek). ________________________________________________________________ APPROVAL to Writeoff the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss OR ________________________________________________________ Deal/Deal Ticket#/Customer (Buyer/Seller) Thank, Clem
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Jane, I still have two discrepancies with Southwest Gas which I need your help in resolving. 1. SWG says price on Sitara 518455 Day 7 should be $9.50 instead of $9.55 - You have already confirmed with me that the price should be $9.55. I forwarded your email to my contact at SWG and she responded with the email below. Could you please call SWG trader Mark Anderson so that this can be resolved? 2. On Sitara 386140 SWG says trigger is calculated on physical, not scheduled, volume - You have already confirmed with me that the trigger is based on scheduled volume and that you feel SWG will not agree. According to my contact at SWG, their trader Bill Brown confirmed with her that the trigger is based on physical volume. Can you please call Bill so that this discrepancy can be resolved? I appreciate your help in resolving these issues. Although I have already forwarded your responses to Nancy at SWG, she is being very insistent that SWG is correct and is requesting that the traders resolve these issues. Thanks again Laurie ---------------------- Forwarded by Laurie Ellis/NA/Enron on 01/30/2001 09:02 AM --------------------------- Laurie Ellis 01/25/2001 11:07 AM To: Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: December Gas Jane, per SWG's email below, can you please call Mark Anderson to resolve the price discrepancy I questioned (SWG says the price on Sitara 518455, Day 7, should be $9.50 instead of $9.55). ---------------------- Forwarded by Laurie Ellis/NA/Enron on 01/25/2001 10:57 AM --------------------------- "Nancy Frazier" <[email protected]> on 01/25/2001 10:53:52 AM To: <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Re: December Gas Please have her contact Mark Anderson our trader. He assured me it was $9.50. I'm sure she has his #. It's up to them to resolve this. Nancy
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi Hoon, How is your day going? call me when you have a chance. Love me
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
which age comment? the one when i said that you were too old to be my girlfriend after i get married?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
All right ladies and gentlemen - here's the skinny on Tahoe... to refresh your memory for those of you who went last year, we stayed in Tahoe City, skiing Squaw and Alpine Meadows. This year to add a little variety I was thinking South Lake Tahoe, which is closer to Heavenly and Kirkwood and includes more of a night life, such as casinos for those of us who are gambling challenged... So here are the details: Dates: The 2nd weekend of March, 3/8-3/10 appears to work best for everyone (especially after enough whining by Reagan). Accommodations: There are a couple of 3-bdrm. condos next door to each other at the Tahoe Keys for $300/night, sleeping 8-10 people each... You can do the math, but it will probably come out to about $35/person/night, give or take... Most of these places have a 3-night minimum, so if everyone can get away Thurs. after work, we could plan on at least staying Thurs-Sat. nights and skiing Fri, Sat., & possibly Sunday. Transportation: They have round trip shuttles from Reno to SLT for about $70 or $75, or we could rent one or two SUVs or vans at the airport - I'll leave that up to yall as I'll be cruising in from my crib Sac-town... Check into flights from your respective cities, but I believe SW has $99 each way from Austin... So that we can go ahead and book these condos, we need to get confirmations from everyone interested in going as soon as possible - also let me know if you can make it up Thurs. nite... Peace, Chris Christopher Lewis Accenture, Austin Suite 300 - 1501 South Mopac Expressway - Austin, TX 78746 Phone: (512) 732-5617 || Octel: 472/5617 email: [email protected] "Sean O'Connell" <[email protected] To: Christopher Lewis/Internal/Accenture@Accenture m> cc: Subject: Re: SKI TRIP!!!! 01/23/2002 11:07 AM Chris, it looks like Smokey and Durkee can get off work the weekend of the 8th and 9th after all. That would actually be a better week for mr 5too because I wouldn't have to miss any school. Let me know how many people you have interested so I can make arrange,ments. Aloha, Sean __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Andy, The scale effect in the transport model can be explained. I use a European option to do the illustration. I raise the underlying and strike price by the same amount, use the fuel percentage to adjust the strike. The net result is the intrinsic value decreases as the level goes up. If the fuel percentage is not very high, the option premium actually increases with the level, although the intrinsic value decreases. If the fuel percentage is very high (>8%), then we see a decreasing option price. In the transport deal, fuel change is often below 5%, so you will not see a decreasing spread option price when NYMEX moves up. So I think the transport model still does what it should do. Zimin In the following exmaple, I used r=6%, vol=20%, T=100days, see spreadsheet for details. ---------------------- Forwarded by Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 01:24 PM --------------------------- Zimin Lu 10/20/2000 10:45 AM To: Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: level effect in transport Andy, The following spread sheet domenstrates the leve effect in transport valuation. I add an "NYMEX add-on" to both delivery and receipt price curve before fuel adjustment, keep everything else the same. The transport value (PV of the spread options) increases when NYMEX add-on increases. I can visit you at your desk if you have further question. Zimin
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Michael and Deepak: Michael Moulton (the ENA paper and pulp trader) is extremely interested in SITA updates as often as possible. Please make every effort to email Michael with updates at least weekly. Thanks. Sara
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Tana: Please send Mark Greenberg a hard copy of the DynegyDirect ETAs with addendums that I negotiated for ENA and EPMI. Mark: Please note that when negotiating an ETA for EPMI or Enron Gas Liquids, for instance, unless the passwords can be restricted to physical products only, it is necessary to include language like the language I included in the EPMI addendum to make clear that notwithstanding the fact that an EPMI password, for instance, is used to enter into a financial power transaction, the Enron entity that is a party to the agreement is ENA and the transaction is governed by the financial derivatives agreement between Dynegy and ENA. Leslie
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
? ----- Original Message ----- From: Larry Knigge - BallotWPBF11.11.00.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The ISO (K Robb) circulated the ISO's position on the Def Penalties this PM. It is attached. As it stands, what the ISO wants now (or previously wanted) is an issue to be decided by the BIC. What is now proposed - empowering the ISO to change the deficiency rates if an adjacent ISO modifies (presumably upward) their caps - has one large problem: if such an action were taken in the midst of a Capability Period it would cause all sorts of issues with participant positions. Having said that I offer the following: The FERC staff report strongly indicated that caps would have to exist (if at all) on a regional basis and at similar levels. In order to de-list and be free to sell out, a generator must make that decision for the following month by the 10th of the current month. That is trading a sure ICAP revenue stream for the increased opportunity to sell energy at higher prices - even if some disaster befell one of out neighbors, the amount that can move is limited by the transmission capability. What is the likelihood that any of the 3 NE ISOs will be uncapped next Summer? The transmission system limits how much energy can flow regardless of price considerations. NY-NE about 1500Mw and NY-PJM about 2000 Mw (pending return of the PARs). BME, if faced with a reserve shortage (or inability to meet load), will curtail exports to solve that problem. Jim (See attached file: Section 5.14 Proposed Tariff language.doc) [email protected] 11/29/2000 05:49 PM Please respond to [email protected] To: [email protected] cc: (bcc: James E. Scheiderich/NUS) Subject: DPS statement re: movement to a one month Obligation Procurement Period [email protected] writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: The following message has been forwarded to the Tech Exchange at the request of Steven Keller of the NY PSC: Statement of the Department of Public Service Staff to the BIC Regarding Shortening the ICAP Obligation Procurement Period from Six Months to One Month The ICAP Working Group has proposed Phase II tariff language that implements the BIC/MC decisions to implement a monthly ICAP obligation procurement period (OPP) instead of the current six-month OPP. It is our understanding that this proposal is largely supported by incumbent load serving entities who are currently required to purchase their ICAP six month's in advance even though they expect to lose load to new entrants during that period. The LSE's are concerned that they may lose money trying to sell unneeded ICAP back into the market. Staff of the New York State Department of Public Service (Staff) understands those concerns. A report by the Brattle Group suggests that the existence of price caps in New York could lead to capacity migration from New York under a one-month OPP scenario. Brattle suggests that under such a system certain "optimistic" suppliers might choose not to offer to sell their ICAP to NY if they think they could do better by selling energy into external markets where they could earn high revenues in high demand month. If that happens, even to a limited extent, we believe it will likely result in increased purchase costs for ICAP purchased both on a bilateral basis and through the ISO auctions, and could also push up energy prices. In a subsequent study by KEMA it is suggested that in order to avoid capacity migration ICAP deficiency charges should be increased as much as six-fold. The obvious result would be that all LSE's would be exposed to significantly higher deficiency charges under a one-month OPP. Staff does not view this as an acceptable alternative to retaining a six-month OPP even with its potential that LSEs may incur a loss as a result of purchasing ICAP for load they expect to lose. As of November 29, 2000, the ISO has been unable to estimate the level of deficiency penalties that would be required to avoid capacity migration under a one-month OPP. As a result, the New York State Department of Public Service has been unable to verify whether the current levels need to be increased, decreased or left as they are. Because of concerns about capacity migration, and because there is very little convincing argument about the costs/benefits that would result from moving to a one-month ICAP OPP that cannot at least partially be obtained from the six month OPP with monthly deficiency auctions, Staff is opposed to such a change at this time. Until the ISO and market participants work out how to ensure that energy and ICAP markets will remain workably competitive even during peak periods, we believe it is prudent to move cautiously with regard to shortening the OPP. - Section 5.14 Proposed Tariff language.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Thanks. See you on Thursday. Susan [email protected] on 04/02/2001 12:03:02 PM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Re: Soccer We have a shirt and we really want her to be a part of the team- I know that the format -- with practices with 2 teams combined with Spring Break and bad weather have made it a little difficult to have the same feeling that we all did with our little micro teams but I know she would like the other girls on the team and have fun! I'll make sure Roy brings her shirt to practice on Thursday. Thanks for letting me know about this and we''ll work together to amok this fun for her! Kathy
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I think the "Wes" we were looking for the other day may be Wes Colwell who I think may be in charge of accounting for ENA. If not, maybe somebody on this list will know something about FAS133. ----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 07:21 PM ----- Rick Causey@ENRON Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON 02/21/2001 02:02 AM To: All Enron Worldwide cc: Subject: Global Accounting Promotions Please join me and the Global Accounting leadership team in congratulating the following individuals on their promotions to: To Managing Director Sally Beck (EWN) Fernley Dyson (EEL) To Vice President Beth Apollo (ENW) Janine Juggins (EEL Tax) Phillip Lord (EBS) Laura Scott (ENA) Chris Sherman (ENA) Wade Stubblefield (EES) To Senior Director Buddy Aiken (EEL) Jim Coffey (ENA) Donette Dewar (Intl. Tax) Patricia Dunn (NEPCO) Mark Frank (ENA) William Gehle (EECC) Joseph Grajewski (EECC) Jan Johnson (Corp) Scott Mills (ENW) James New (EEL) Mary L. Ruffer (ENA) Richard Sage (EEL) Elaine Schield (Corp) Kevin Sweeney (ENW) Beth Wapner (EBS Tax) Director Thresa Allen (ENW) Ron Baker (Corp) Misty Barrett (EES) Jeff Blumenthal (EWS) Trey Cash (Corp Tax) Karen Choyce (Corp) Cheryl Dawes (ENA) Lanette Earnest (EWS Tax) Jeffrey Gossett (ENW) Robert Guthrie (ETS Tax) Susan Helton (ENA) Ralph Jaeger (EEL) Andrea Kerch (EEL) Faith Killen (ENA) Johnna Kokenge (Corp) Matt Landy (EEL) Andy Lawrence (ISC) Connie Lee (EBS) Caroline Lothian (EEL) Meg Malone (Corp Tax) Gary Peng (Corp) Stephen Schwarzbach (Corp) Sally Seelig (EES Tax) Don Shackley (EES/London Tax) Patricia Shannon (Corp) Eddie Sikes (Intl. Tax) Jeffrey Smith ( EGM) Ron Smith (GSS) Kim Theriot (ENW) Hope Vargas (ENA) Tina Ward (EEL) Stephen Whitaker (EEL) Stacey White (ENW) Rob Wilcott (Corp) To Manager Christopher Abel (ENW) Stacey Aune (ENA) David Baumbach (ENW) Maya Beyhum (ENW London) Patricia Bloom (ENA) Matthew Brown (ENW) Vince Cacaro (ISC) Clara Carrington (ENW) Carol Carter (ENA) Carolyn Centilli (ISC) Erin Copeland (EECC) Richard Cross (ENW) Rachel Davis (Corp) Michael Desbiens (ISC) David Dupre (ISC) Eileen Flanagan (EEL) Regina Figueroa (ISC) Rebecca Ford (ENW) Darron Giron (ENW) Julie Goodfriend (International Tax) Karen Gruesen (ENA) Kevin Hall (EEL) Kristen Hanson (ENW) David Horne (ISC) Larry Hunter (ENW) Todd Hunter (EES) Jim Ischy (GSS) Chris Jones (ISC) William Kasmervisz (ENW) Kam Kaiser (ENW) Kedar Kulkarni (ISC) Monica Lande (ENW Portland) Suzanne Lane (EEL) Vince Mack (ISC) David Maxwell (ENW) Emitra Nelson (ISC Caroline Nugent (EWS Tax) Mark Pope (ISC) Yiannis Poulopoulos (London Tax) Melissa Ratnala (ENW) Jason Sharp (Corp Tax) Stephanie Smith (Corp) Patricia Spence (ENW) Amy Spode (ENW) Patricia Sullivan (ENW) Lisa Sutton (ETS) John Swinney (ENW) Deana Taylor (Corp) Dimitri Taylor (ENW) Wayne Tencer (EES) Bernella Tholen (ENA) Theresa Vos (ENA) Blake Walker (EECC) Bob Ward (International Tax) David Williams (EEL) To Senior Specialist Amelia Alland (ENW) James Armstrong (ENA) Carmen Ayala (GSS Cynthia Balfour-Flanagan (ENW) Gilda Bartz (Corp) Stacey Brewer (ENW) Marian Briscoe (Corp Tax) Aneela Charania (ENW) Patricia Clark (Corp) Chris Crixell (EES Tax) Diane Ellstrom (ENW) Heidi Griffith (EES) Marla Hernandez (ISC) Marlene Hilliard (ENW) Dave Hollick (London Tax) Rachel Jones (EEL) Dawn Kenne (ENW) Harry Kent (EWS Tax) Blanca Lopez (ENA) Brian Hunter Lindsay (EEL) Rachel Lyon (EEL) Stacy Hardy (ENA) Sally McAdams (ISC) Kelly McCain (Corp Tax) Errol McLaughlin, Jr. (ENW) Sylvia Martinez (ISC) Kevin Meredith (ENW) Meredith Mitchell (ENW) Winnie Ngai (Corp Tax) Thien-Huong Ngo (ENW) Brian Palmer (ENW) Bich Ann T Pham (ENA) Shelly Pierson (Corp) Lillie Pittman (ISC) David Rae (ENW) Dixie Riddle (ETS Tax) Salvador Dominguez (Corp) Mark Schrab (ENW) Stephanie Sever (ENW) Danielle Shafer (ISC) Shifali Sharma (ENW) Keith Simper (ENA) Christopher Spears (ENW) Caron Stark (ISC) Tara Sweitzer (ENW) David Vandor (ENA) Mary Womack (ISC) David Yang (International Tax) Sabrae Zajac (ENW) To Specialist Kim Chick (EES Tax) Justin East (EEL) Joey Esperance (International Tax) Randi Howard (ISC) Melanie Hutchinson (EWS Tax) Mary Joseph (Corp Tax) Sherri Kathol (International Tax) Lex Lacaze (International Tax) Michelle LeBlanc (Corp Tax) Ling Li (EWS Tax) Kori Loibl (ENW) Alan Marsh (Corp Tax) Bruce Mills (ENW) Erika Moore (EEL) Matthew Motsinger (ENW) Sherry Meyers (ISC) Andrea Price (Corp Tax) Bernice Rodriguez (ENW) Tina Salinas (EES Tax) Brent Vasconcellos (Corp Tax) Brandi Wachtendorf (ENW) Patryk Wlodarski (ENW London) To Entry Specialist Stuart Sheldrick (EEL) To Accountant I Becky Klussman (Corp) To Accountant II Silvia Shelby (Accounts Payable) To Staff Mary Behn (EES) Guy Freshwater (ENW London) Geralynn Gosnell (ENW) Richard Miley (ENW) Brent Storey (ENW London) Stuart Thom (ENW London) Judith Walters (ENW) Jonathan White (ENW London) Joan Winfrey (ENW) To Senior Tax Analyst Emily Allwardt (International Tax) Leon Branom (EBS Tax) Shanna Husser (EES Tax) Shilpa Mane (Corporate/London Tax) Todd Richards (Corp Tax) Michelle Thompson (Corp Tax) To Sr. Administrative Assistant Norma Chavez (International Tax) Sarah Knott (ENW London) To Sr. Travel Administrator Cheryl Slone (GSS ) To Administrative Coordinator Heather Choate (ENW) Kayla Heitmeyer (GSS) To Senior Clerk Angela Barnett (ENW) Matthew Davies (ENW London) Daniela De Lisi (ENW London) Rufino Dorteo (ENA) Mark Pilkington (ENW London) Narjinder Sandhu (EEL) Howard Sweasey (EEL) Laura Vargas (ENW) Jo Ann Woods (Corp Tax) To Intermediate Clerk Maria Maldonado (Accounts Payable) Araceli Mondragon (Accounts Payable) Irma Rodriguez (Accounts Payable) Bernita Sowell (Accounts Payable)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Updated questions and answers for Enron employees have just been posted to http://home.enron.com/updates/qa.html We recognize that as active employees you have special concerns and questions related to Enron's bankruptcy filing. We regret that we are not able to answer all of your questions as quickly as you deserve, but we are working to provide accurate responses to your most important questions about employee benefits, expense payments and so on. We appreciate your patience as we continue to try to provide timely and reliable information to you.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
this is really funny. PL
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hey The amt of info we get is even worse as fred usually calls with updates and since u know noothing - we know less. I will check into your thoughts and get back to u. Heading to toronto to see family- my brother is home fromjapan. I will get georgie to call you - he is pretty tapped into it all - what number shud he call you on - heightened state of awareness down there with the flow of info - will call ltr to explain - I think afraid of mass exodus Spk soon and take care- if I hear anything (other than what is on CNBC !!) I will let you know.... Robyn 203 561 9796- cell -------------------------- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Take a look at the "Spot Deals" tab in this worksheet and let me know if I'm missing anything. My comments are on row 5. Everything else on this sheet is a work in progress.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Guys, how are the business units doing on the "talent pipeline" since we have put this on auto-pilot? Is HR still providing resumes? Regards Delainey
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Good Morning All! This morning Cheryl is being fitted for her wedding gown. She will arrive at the office between 11:30 - 12, this afternoon. Feel free to contact me at 5-3317, should you need any assistance. Thanks, and have a great morning. Keegan
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I forgot to copy you ... ---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 03/20/2001 10:00 PM --------------------------- Alan Comnes 03/20/2001 09:54 PM To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: FERC Staff market mitigation comments for California--Comments of Enron--DUE WEDNESDAY To West Desk Traders in Cali: On Thursday 3/22, FERC will accept comments on its staff's plan to provide market mitigation to California ISO markets. A summary of the report is copied below. Enron GA plans to file a motion that will support the comments of EPSA and WPTF and supplement the comments as noted below. EPSA's comments are generally supportive of the staff report but recommends that FERC: clarify that staff's market mitigation measures are being put into place to address structural defects in the California market, not the abuse of market power by any market participants; avoid the use of cost-based rates as a proxy for competitive prices during times of scarcity; ensure that if cost-based proxy rates are used, those rates includes the full value of scarcity, capacity, opportunity costs, and other factors; develop proxy rates, if necessary, using the formula in the March 9th Refund Order RATHER THAN the unit specific marginal costs identified in the order; and forego forced bidding into real-time markets. WPTF will make similar comments (generally with more color and vehemence) and will also raise how lack of creditworthiness will affect price. I also recommend we supplement the EPSA/WPTF comments with some additional comments on energy-limited resources, see attached. Please prove Sue Mara or I with your comments by COB Wednesday. Thank you, Alan Comnes Report Summary (from EPSA) Stressing that the proposal is designed to apply only to approximately five percent of the market that remains in real-time and not to the bilateral and forward markets, the Report immediately notes that "ultimately the real solution to California's problems lies in increased investments in infrastructure." The Report recommends that the California ISO conduct a real-time auction with associated measures to mitigate the impact of physical and economic withholding and significant exercises of market power during periods of scarcity: (1) Coordinating and Controlling Outages - The ISO should coordinate and approve all planned outages by units that have a Participating Generator Agreement (PGA) with the ISO. Coordination and outage control procedures should then be coupled with reporting requirements to FERC and dispute review should be expedited. Similarly, the ISO should closely monitor unplanned outages and report questionable outages to FERC for further investigation. (2) Selling Obligations - All capacity that is available and not scheduled to run under sellers with PGAs should be offered in the real-time market - this obligation would not be imposed on bilateral markets of the ISO day-ahead markets. PGA generators would have to submit to FERC a dependable capacity for each unit in addition to other operating parameters necessary to calculate marginal costs, such as heat rate. FERC Staff would then use this data, in combination with published fuel costs and emission credit data to determine a price that the ISO would use pre-determined to mitigate prices during times of reserve deficiency. Load Serving Entities should also be required to name their curtailment price and to identify which loads will be curtailed. (3) Price Mitigation - When called upon to provide the available and unscheduled capacity as mentioned above, PGA unit prices would be mitigated in hours when there is a reserve deficiency, or Stage 3 emergencies (the Report notes that it is "these hours which are extremely conducive to the exercise of market power by suppliers") and will be obligated to sell capacity in real-time at the marginal cost of the highest-priced PGA until called upon to run. (4) Real-time Price Mitigation for Each Generating Unit - all generating units should have a standing, confidential price based on its marginal costs. This price will be used by the ISO to establish the real-time market clearing price when mitigation is appropriate. Staff believes that a single market clearing price auction design is appropriate, thus reversing the recommendation to use an as bid design in the December Order. (5) Market Clearing Price - All real-time energy offers should be paid the applicable market clearing price. (6) Conditions for Invoking Mitigation - Mitigation measures should only be applied to critical operating periods, such as emergencies. As noted in the Report, Staff recognizes that there are potential difficulties in implementing the proposal, and that "there are no easy answers to the current problems in the California market." Among the purported difficulties, Staff notes implementation problems with bidding obligations on imported power, incentive effects on load scheduling, treatment of purchased power, mitigating prices during emergencies, and setting a price component for scarcity.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Energy Info Source is privileged to make available to you a free sample issue of its Bi-weekly Transmission Update Report (attached). This report contains the latest ISO, RTO, Utility, and Merchant Transmission news provided in PDF format delivered to you via email every other week all for only $75/year for an individual subscription (corporate subscriptions for multiple users are available for $200/year). Check it out and if you'd like to subscribe, click on the following link to order online or call us at 888-986-2250 to order by phone. We accept Visa/Mastercard/American Express or can invoice your company. http://www.energyinfosource.com/rapid/report_transmission.cfm Viewing the report requires Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or higher, available free at: http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html ---------------------- If you want to be removed from our mailing list or for more information: Energy Info Source, Inc. email: [email protected] phone: 888-986-2250 - Trans07_23.pdf
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Barbara, I am forwarding to you today a fully executed GISB for your client. Also, what is the status of your review of the Master Agreement? Does your client wish to proceed with this agreement? Please advise at your convenience. Best regards, Debra Perlingiere Enron North America Corp. Legal Department 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885 Houston, Texas 77002 [email protected] Phone 713-853-7658 Fax 713-646-3490
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
FYI, Our SAP company number is 413 and the cost center is 105668. ---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Stokes/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 09:24 AM --------------------------- Michelle Vitrella 06/16/2000 11:33 AM To: Diana Ovalle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Virginia Cavazos/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Cicchetti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angelina V Lorio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Xochil Moreno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cherylene R Westbrook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Giselle James/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Thais Hensch/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kischa Gipson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Terry Furches/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Lerro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Graves/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Weatherstone/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ladish/Corp/Enron@Enron, Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Venita Coleman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris X Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melanie Facundo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Tovar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ana Alcantara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine Benedict/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ginny Boss/DEN/ECT@Enron, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Brian/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elaine Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Esther Buckley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Buis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Bullock/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elaine Campbell/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lydia Cannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nella Cappelletto/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sherri Carpenter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Castanos/NA/Enron@Enron, Pilar Cerezo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christy Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Clyatt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Comello/Corp/Enron@Enron, Betty J Coneway/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy Cooper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine Crosswhite/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Fallon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Danielle Dees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felicia Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christine Drummond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Catherine DuMont/PDX/ECT@ECT, Deborah J Edison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lora Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stella L Ely/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Felling/DEN/ECT@Enron, Yolanda Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deana Fortine/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Gardner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Garza/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Grisaffi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam Grubel/ECP/Enron@Enron, Alisha Guerrero/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mollie Gustafson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Anabel Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudette Harvey/HOU/ECT@ect, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Hoover/ECP/Enron@Enron, April Hrach/SF/ECT@ECT, Renee Ingram/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geraldine Irvine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carmella Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leticia Leal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tonai Lehr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lorie Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maxine E Levingston/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barbara Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Emma Linton/CAL/ECT@ECT, Vickie Lopez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelby Malkemes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julissa Marron/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nicole Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela McCulloch/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sandra R McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Elena Mendoza/NA/Enron@Enron, Jana Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Mireles/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luann Mitchell/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cherry Mont/NY/ECT@ECT, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Morrissette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelley Myers/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carla M O'Neil/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frances Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonna Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terrellyn Parker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Parra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ragayle Pellum/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fannette A Perry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon Purswell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Ramirez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jessica Ramirez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Reyna/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janice Riedel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tina Rode/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grace Rodriguez/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Anthony Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth A Ryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn Schader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Serwin/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tina Spiller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Beverly Stephens/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cindy Stokes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerry Taylor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Grace Taylor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tina Tennant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denise Tubb/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, Valerie Urbanek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Xochitl-Alexis Velasco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Warren/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Weatherly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Teri Whitcomb/PDX/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Zachary/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Zarsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT@ECT, Dusty Warren Paez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aric Archie/NA/Enron@Enron, Tomara Renee Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Yvonne Laing/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: GL CO and Cost Center Numbers Attached is the conversion tables for RC to SAP Cost Center and CO# to SAP GL Company. These numbers are needed for proper expense reporting, timekeeping and internal services (i.e. after hours lighting/AC, building services and graphics). It is very important that this information is distributed to everyone in your group. Just a friendly reminder..... JUNE 30 DEADLINE!!!! all time for the period beginning June 16 and ending June 30 must be entered into SAP by 3pm CST. -New SAP coding must be used for all time, expenses and invoices -Timekeeping functionality and System ID's will be available for all employees paid out of Corp Payroll in Houston, June 22 Check out the SAP website (http://sap.enron.com/) for updated info as well as access to the Center of Expertise(COE) link, which also has helpful information and forms. If you have questions please contact the Center of Expertise (COE) 713-345-4SAP, x54727 or by email [email protected].
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 04:04 PM --------------------------- Tori Kuykendall 04/26/2000 03:55 PM To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Fw: Corruption Test ---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 03:53 PM --------------------------- Matthew Lenhart 04/26/2000 03:40 PM To: Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Fw: Corruption Test ---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 03:39 PM --------------------------- Shirley Elliott <[email protected]> on 04/26/2000 08:03:31 AM To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Allison Damon <[email protected]>, Josh Sherman <[email protected]>, Maria Vigil <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Fw: Corruption Test I think we've all seen a different version of this. ______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________ Subject: Fw: Corruption Test Author: [email protected] at Internet-USA Date: 4/26/2000 8:00 AM E-mail me back and let me know what you scored. - CORRUPTI.EXE - RFC-822.TXT ---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes --------------------------- From: [email protected] at Internet-USA Date: 4/26/00 8:00AM -0500 To: Shirley Elliott at DTT.US.HOUSTON *To: [email protected] at Internet-USA *To: [email protected] at Internet-USA *To: [email protected] at Internet-USA *To: [email protected] at Internet-USA *To: [email protected] at Internet-USA *To: [email protected] at Internet-USA *To: [email protected] at Internet-USA *To: [email protected] at Internet-USA Subject: Fw: Corruption Test ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The JP Morgan report below gives further credence to the Mills/Huber thesis of digital-age power growth. The in-the-trenches story is different from some of the academic studies by the conservation mavens. - Rob - jp morgan.pdf
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Christie, I am forwarding you a message I have received from the University of Houston. Can you help them? We have a very good relationship with the UoH. Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 05:14 PM --------------------------- Aisha Jamal <[email protected]> on 04/23/2001 03:15:29 PM Please respond to [email protected] To: [email protected] cc: [email protected] Subject: Dr. Michelle Foss- Energy Institute Dear Mr. Kaminski, I am writing to ask a favor for Dr. Michelle Foss. As you know we will be running our "New Era" program from May 14- May 25th. Dr. Foss was wondering if on May 22nd (between 1:30pm and 4:00pm) , we would be able to bring our participants for a tour of your trading floor. At this time we will have 30-40 people, and since only 10 people maximum should really be on a trading floor we need to have 4 companies among which to divide our participants. At this time, we have a floor from Coral Energy, and are working with Duke, and I will be contacting Mr. Paul Roberts to arrange for the Reliant Energy trading floor. I was hoping very much that you would be able to direct me to the right person to contact to arrange this tour. Will this be a possiblity? I really appreciate your help very much. Thank you! Best Regards, Aisha Jamal Energy Institute 713-743-4634
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The New York Hilton sounds good and the location is good. We are paying for this, so we don't want to spend a fortune. I also emailed Nellie in Klauberg's office to see if she had any recommendations/connections. You know I do make sure his bills get paid!!!!!!! Are you going to be doing business on your vacation days because if you are, I'm not going to charge you. I just don't think that's right. Have you guys had any new additions to your group? Kay Mann@ENRON 06/06/2001 03:30 PM To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: [email protected]@ECT, [email protected]@ECT Subject: Re: New York Hotel Never stayed there. My current favorite is the Omni, which is in one of may favorite locations. It has a little deli like shop across the street, where I can buy reasonably priced bagels, cokes, etc. Last year I also stayed at the Marriott Marquis (BIG, right on Times Square) and the Mark (too snooty). I stayed two other places I didn't like, but the names escape me. I've seen some other smaller hotels which look nice, and if I check a map I might remember the names. Kay From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/06/2001 12:37 PM To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] cc: Subject: New York Hotel What do you guys know about the Mayflower. We are looking for a hotel in New York at Christmas. ----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2001 12:36 PM ----- "Doherty, Ric" <[email protected]> 06/06/2001 12:33 PM To: "Suzanne Adams Doherty (E-mail)" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: New York Hotel Do any of your people know anything about this place....it is where Pam and Scott stayed and really liked it...recommended by Brysch http://www.mayflowerhotel.com/welcome.htm Thanks, Ric Doherty (281) 514-7624 - office (800) 920-8171 - pager [email protected] [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }