text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Although this is EWS floor meeting, you may want to come to hear the messages being delivered. MHC
-----Original Message-----
From: Clyatt, Julie
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:15 PM
To: Abshire, Kathy; Allex, Anne Marie; Alvarez, Irma; Anderson, Kristi; Argyriou, Carla; Arya, Sunjay; Avery, Ladonna; Barela, Rocio; Barnard, Marla; Berry, Lara; Blaylock, John; Brasseaux, Ben; Broadfoot, Mark; Broussard, Tharsilla; Brown, Ashley; Brown, Cole; Buck, Gary; Buckley, Karen; Burke, Todd; Cash, Michelle; Cashion, Tana; Chavira, Carmen; Christner, Shelly; Coats, Carol; Collins, James A.; Conn, Philip; Corteselli, Gina; Cox, Shirley; Cronin, Jennifer; Cruz, Magdelena; Curless, Amanda; Daffin, Margaret; Davies, Neil; Davis, Christopher (HR); De Jesus, Frank; De La Paz, Janet; Delgado, Lydia; Dennison, Margaret; Dillehay, Leonard; Dillingham, Geynille; Divelbiss, Sasha; Duncan, Josh; Edwards, Erika; Engler, Adrianne; Evans, Carrie; Fincher, Wendy; Fitzpatrick, Amy; Foster, David; Funkhouser, Shanna; Fuqua, Linda; Galloway, Sonja; Gambill, Amy; Garcia, Grace; Garcia, Robert; Gomez, Javier; Gonzalez, Cynthia; Graham, Toni; Guerrero, Raquel; Hankamer, Cecilia; Hayes, Tracy; Herman, Ben; Hernandez, Iracema; Hickok, Kim; Hill, Dave (HR); Hill, Jo Ann; Hull, James; Iacobell, Don; Inglis, Elspeth; James, Theresia; Johnson, Debra S.; Joyner, Tamera; Kanouff, Erin; Keprta, Dovie; Kerr, Vanessa; Knudsen, Sheila A.; Kutach, Laura; Labbe, Anne; Lee, Gustavia; Lewis, Simone; Lorenz, Michael; Luong, Anjelica; Magee, Molly; Manning, MaryKay; Mathew, Jason; Mayes, Fran; McLoughlin, Hector; McMullan, David; McSherry, Brad; Melodick, Kim; Migliore, Todd; Napoli, Judey; Nolly, Qiana; Oquinn, Kari; O'rourke, Tim; Palmer, Johnny; Palmer, Lizzette; Parker, Courtnie; Parker, Gilda; Parra, Veronica; Patel, Tania; Peikert, Todd; Peng, Terry; Perez, Lisa; Perkins, Ramona; Phillips, Karen; Phillips, Ryan; Pierce, Shelly; Pina, Rafael; Pineda, Nicole; Presas, Gracie S.; Prihoda, Melissa; Quiller, Amanda; Quintana, Becky; Russi, Estalee; Ryan, Noel; Salas, Vangie; Seleznov, Ryan; Sharma, Pankaj; Simon, Cindy; Skinner, Cindy; Slone, Jeanie; Solis, Felicia; Stevens, Andria; Stone, Sandy; Storey, Eddie; Sweet, Twanda; Tamez, Elisa; Taormina, Jennifer; Taylor, Barbara; Taylor, Charles A - HR; Terrell, Margo; Tessandori, Bobbi; Trevino, Imelda D.; Trieschman, Paul; Vanwey, Debi; Vasut, Tony; Venkataramani, Sandhya; Verity, Jackie; Villarreal, Norma; Wachel, Jamie; Walker, Simone Scott; Walton, Sheila; Warren, Davette; Weatherford, April; Weinberger,Paul; Weltz, Tracy; White, Cheryl; Wilbeck, Tom; Worrell, Perrin; Wright, Tracy; Wysatta, Margaret; Yeverino, Norma; Zall, Howard; Zermeno, Rosalinda
Cc: Pieper, Kalen; Lopez, Leasa; Smith, Gary; Perry, Carolyn
Subject: EWS HR Floor Meeting
<http://www.gifworks.com/queue/pilgram_pumpkin_md_wht_16172.gif>
Please join us for an EWS HR Floor meeting -
When : Friday, November 16th
Where : Around EB 3678
Time : 8:30 a.m. - 9:30 a.m.
Please forward this on to anyone I might have left off of the distribution list. Thank you. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I'll keep plugging, with plan being to get you the rest today.
Best,
Jeff
Margaret Carson
04/03/2001 12:19 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: AWESOME THANKS FOR INPUT 7...I AWAIT THE REST
Thx again, Margaret | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Professor Titman:
I hope you had an enjoyable summer and it didn't go too quickly. I hope
you remember who I am from last years application process. I enjoyed meeting
you last year and talking with you regarding the curriculum and admissions
process. I wanted to let you know that I am still very much interested in
attending the Business School.
I took your advice this summer and took a graduate level finance class
(Financial Management), which I received an A. I was very pleased with
myself, because I had not taken this type of class in quite some time. I
have decided to take another graduate level finance class (Macroeconomics),
which I am currently taking and runs through December.
I also sent my information regarding my learning disability into GMAC to try
and receive a "special testing status" for the GMAT. I am currently waiting
to hear back from them with their decision.
As you can see, I am still very much interested in attending the Business
School for next year and I'm in the process of doing whatever I can to
increase my application profile. I am also sending an e-mail to Carl Harris,
who heads up the admissions process to inform him of these recent
developments.
Please let me know if there is anything else you think I need to do to
enhance my application profile. Again, I hope all is going well and I look
forward to hearing from you soon
Regards,
Ben Rogers
Enron Corp.
P.S. David Martin says hello! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The problem with using something other than a quantitative measure (like
percentage) is that we quickly get into something to argue about with the
customer.
Some alternatives off the top of my head to get the ball rolling:
- Gross Error determined by independent arbitrator or possibly an appointed
third party (auditor?)
- Transaction which differs by more than x% from verified other transactions
between independent companies during the same period (not just quotations).
- Transaction which does not lie within the boundaries of other transactions
between independent companies which occurred on that day.
- Transaction which does not lie within the bid-offer hi and lo range
identified by industry price reports published for that day. (obvious
limitations here)
Dave
Louise Kitchen@ECT
08/22/2000 02:35 PM
To: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Gross Error language
Is there not something better than a percentage? Noticce the lack of a
better answer from me.
Andy Zipper@ENRON
22/08/2000 11:44
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Gross Error language
I think 5% is way too small. At certin physical locations for both gas and
power, a 5% move is easily achievable in the normal course of business i.e.
35 mwh power to 45mwh or Transco Z6 from 5.00 to 5.50 in the next trade. I
think something in the neighborhood of 20% to 25% is
commercially reasonable. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
missing deal for tom
sell el paso
21-22
255.00
25 mw
mid c
on peak | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a spreadsheet to estimate export fees. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I just received this Emergency Change impacting EOL. Please insure all
processing is done by 5:00 pm today. The Building Facilities group is adding
additional power sources to the EOL equipment racks. The EOL team plans to
bring down the EOL Production Data Bases during this time period.
Bob Martinez
-----Original Message-----
From: Nguyen, Mai
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 11:22 AM
To: Enron Change Management
Subject: A Change Control Project Has Been Created With Emergency Status for
MN232.
Importance: High
--------------------------------------------------------
EMERGENCY UPDATE
--------------------------------------------------------
It was created by Mai Nguyen. The title of the project is EOL Power issue.
The change number for the project is MN232.
Impact: EOL
Time: Fri 2/2/2001 at 5:15:00 PM thru Fri 2/2/2001 at 8:00:00 PM
Outage: EOL Power issue
Disruption: Total Disruption of Service
Environments Impacted: EOL
Purpose: Power Redundancy for EOL
Backout:
Contact(s): Mai Nguyen
Document Link-> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is Mr. Lay's bio.
Rosalee
"Heidi VanGenderen" <[email protected]> on 05/08/2001 10:46:40 AM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To:
cc: "Marshall Kaplan (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "'Sue Green'"
<[email protected]>, "Tom McCoy (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Request for Bios
Hello All:
We are looking forward to the May 22-23 Forum on Securing the Energy Future
of the Western United States.
If you wish to have a paragraph-long bio included in the Forum notebook,
please respond to this e-mail by sending your bio. Feel free to fax one, if
that's easier, as well.
Please don't hesitate to contact us with any questions or comments.
Thanks very much,
Heidi VanGenderen, Senior Associate
Wirth Chair in Environmental and
Community Development Policy
Institute for Policy Research and Implementation
University of Colorado-Denver
1445 Market Street, Suite 350
Denver, CO 80202-1727
Tel - 303-820-5676
Fax - 303-534-8774 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
John:
Here is the presentation for tomorrow's meeting with Enron North America and
FPL Energy.
Regards,
Ben Rogers | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/27/2001 08:38
AM ---------------------------
From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 02/26/2001 04:35 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: Weekly GE Conference Call
The GE conference call will take place at its scheduled time of 1:30 p.m. CST
on Wednesday, February 28, 2001.
Dial In: 1-888-285-4585
Participant: 536220
Host: 121970 (Sheila)
For those of you in Houston, EB38C1 has been reserved. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Debra:
Please verify that Mr. Dixon's facts are accurate.
Thanks!
Marie
-----Original Message-----
From: "Dixon, Billy D" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:09 PM
To: Heard, Marie
Cc: St. Clair, Carol; Jones, Tana
Subject: RE: BP Master Netting Agreement
Marie:
We don't show any trading contracts in existence with Vastar Gas Marketing,
Inc. All of Vastar Gas Marketing,Inc.'s contracts were assigned to Southern
Company Energy Marketing after BP acquired Vastar.
Do you have any information otherwise?
Very truly yours,
BILLY
Billy D. Dixon
Attorney
BP America Inc.
501 Westlake Park Blvd., Rm 16.166
Houston, Texas 77079
Direct 281/366-4745
Fax 281/366-5901
[email protected]
***IMPORTANT -- THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS HERETO ARE ATTORNEY-CLIENT
AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. If you have
received this email in error, do not under any circumstances read, forward,
copy, disseminate or save this email or any of its attachments. If you have
received this email in error, take the following actions: (1) reply to this
email indicating that you received this email in error, and (2) delete and
completely erase this email and its attachments from your computer and any
backup systems or "Deleted Items" folders.
-----Original Message-----
From: Heard, Marie [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: St. Clair, Carol; Jones, Tana
Subject: BP Master Netting Agreement
Mr. Dixon:
Pursuant to Carol St. Clair's request, I am attaching our preliminary
list of the agreements to be under the BP Master Netting Agreement.
Since we don't own 100% of EOTT, any master netting agreement involving
EOTT will not be under this master netting agreement.
Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything else.
Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone: (713) 853-3907
Fax: (713) 646-3490
[email protected]
<<BP Master Netting Agreement File
Index.doc>>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Vivian,
Thanks for your assistance.
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Hart, Vivian
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Ring, Richard
Cc: Smith, Angela
Subject: FW: Oct Green Power
-----Original Message-----
From: Hamby, John
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Hart, Vivian
Subject: Oct Green Power
<< File: GREENPOWER_OCT-2001.xls >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Glad you liked them. Yes, cats do seem to like to explore all sorts of
spaces - grocery bags are always a good bet. I remember Dusty, the cat we
had in Bethesda, used to like to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the
covers. Go figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of the photo of me.
And yes again, the online platform mentioned in the analyst's report is the
system I've spent so much time on over the last nine months or so. It's kind
of exciting to see a project in print like that but now it means we have to
really make it work!
I received the package from MetLife on the Long-Term Care insurance. I had a
couple of questions which I called the company about (premiums, pre-tax vs.
after tax, etc.) and would be happy to go over it with you. Do you want me
to send the stuff to you or should we just chart about it frst?
Love, Mark | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This request has been pending your approval for 45 days. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000024686&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.
Request ID : 000000000024686
Request Create Date : 3/21/01 8:04:40 AM
Requested For : [email protected]
Resource Name : TradeWave NWOASIS
Resource Type : Applications | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is my suggested edit to the last sentence.
Tony Pryor
11/01/2000 10:43 AM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON
Subject: EOL Policy
Attached for your review and comment is a draft of a policy to be distributed
to EOL/ENA employees. While the policy may seem over-restrictive, the fact
basis upon which the policy is based is that the activities identified in the
policy are currently performed by ENA employees. Of course, we still need to
talk about this issue. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
left you a voice mail. Have we ever done a basis swap with Phibro or the UK
entitiy? What is the payment date? This deal concluded about a month ago.
SS
Bernice Rodriguez
07/06/99 09:02 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Phibro Inc - EX6176.1
Another new week....
Any updates on this .....
---------------------- Forwarded by Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT on 07/06/99
09:02 AM ---------------------------
Bernice Rodriguez
07/02/99 02:14 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Phibro Inc - EX6176.1
Hi there !!
Any updates on this....
BR
---------------------- Forwarded by Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT on 07/02/99
02:14 PM ---------------------------
Bernice Rodriguez
06/30/99 10:13 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Phibro Inc - EX6176.1
I will be faxing you the confirmation and deal ticket on this trade. This is
the first CFD we've had with Phibro Inc.
Please review and if you have questions, please call.
Thanks
Bernice
x37972 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We consistently have to work on the lack of response issue. Some of that is dealt with through walking around and poking around. We just have to be vigilant in ferreting out information. Additionally, approval can be received via e-mail, phone or in-person from business unit head OR commercial group head. Our goal will be to do everything possible to make sure an article appears rather than holding it for future release.
As for the EEOS/ENA or cross group issue, that is addressed in #4 below. Please advise.
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:57 AM
To: Thode, Eric
Cc: Grabstald, Kathie
Subject: RE: Approval Process for EnTouch
I am worried though that stories will miss the report purely through lack of response. Are we also addressing the recent issue which was a cross group issue (EEOS would have approved this story even though ENA wouldn't). I think you need some check where stories include two groups.
Louise
-----Original Message-----
From: Thode, Eric
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Cc: Grabstald, Kathie
Subject: Approval Process for EnTouch
Louise --
My recommendation for an approval process for EnTouch is as follows:
1) The deadline to provide information for that week's issue of EnTouch will be Wednesday at 12:00 pm. All information submitted after that time will be held until the following week.
2) A draft of EnTouch will be forwarded to each business unit head (or their designee) and commercial group head (or their designee), who has a Business Highlight or other information appearing in that particular issue. E-mail, phone or in-person approval will be required from either a business unit head (or their designee) or commercial group head (or their designee) prior to distribution to Enron Messaging Administration on Thursday at 2:00 pm.
3) If approval is not received prior to the deadline, the Business Highlight or other information will be pulled until approval is received.
4) In the event a business unit or commercial group provides information that crosses business unit or commercial group lines, all affected business units and commercial groups will receive the draft and a representative of each involved party will be required to approve per instruction # 2.
I believe this process will alleviate the two problems that have occurred over the past few months. Please advise.
Additionally, I have attached the list of contacts Kathie uses for gathering EnTouch information. It includes the primary contacts and their secondary contacts. Please feel free to comment on this list.
Thanks.
Eric
<< File: entouch list.doc >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI and comments that impact our gas pipeline industry.
Greek
-----Original Message-----
From: Gay H. Friedmann [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:01 AM
To: Alvin J. Feist (E-mail); Cary Flynn (E-mail); Dana Cupit (E-mail); David Borcyk (E-mail); David L. Hendrix (E-mail); Dell Vassallo (E-mail); Edward R. Coats (E-mail); G. Stephen Arnold (E-mail); Gene Petru (E-mail); Greek L. Rice (E-mail); Jack Battin (E-mail); James Brossett (E-mail); Jim Evans (E-mail); John M. O'Brien (E-mail); John Mills (E-mail); Judy Vandagriff (E-mail); Kathy Murray (E-mail); Lloyd Borders (E-mail); Mont McNeil (E-mail); Morris Jackson (E-mail); Nancy Priemer (E-mail); Paul Newman (E-mail); Peter Cardone (E-mail); Robert D. Taylor (E-mail); Steven Wagner (E-mail); Theodore J. Vogel (E-mail); Winston DePass (E-mail)
Subject: EEI an economic Stimulus Package
Importance: High
As you know the House has passed their economic stimulus package. This contains a deduction of 30% in the first year for property placed in service after September 10, 2001 and before December 31, 2004. EEI convened a meeting late last week to see if other industries had a problem similar to theirs; i.e., that most of their property additions take a longer time to build. They also would like to see repair and replacement of their property included as this also promotes jobs.
Enclosed is a proposed amendment by EEI along with a explanatory position paper. <<expensechanges to section 101.rtf>> <<expensingcorrec2.DOC>>
They want to know if other associations, such as INGAA, have a similar problem and would support such a change. PLEASE LET ME KNOW PRIOR TO 12:30 PM ON THURSDAY IF YOU NEED THIS CHANGE. I WILL BE ATTENDING A MEETING AT EEI. THANKS. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Janice said she saw you on CNBC this am. She said she knows why you are CEO of Enron.....she thinks you could have a career in TV if you decide to change jobs. You have a lot to be proud of....Congratulations!
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
************************************************************************
The information contained in this ELECTRONIC MAIL transmission
is confidential. It may also be privileged work product or proprietary
information. This information is intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution [other
than to the addressee(s)], copying or taking of any action because
of this information is strictly prohibited.
************************************************************************ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
i can but have never done it before
From: Yvette G Connevey @ ENRON 02/28/2000 02:07 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Backing up Dave
Yes Bryan will be in but won't you need to back him up on Storage??
From: Eric Bass @ ECT 02/28/2000 02:03 PM
To: Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Backing up Dave
backing him up on what - bryan will be in, correct?
From: Yvette G Connevey @ ENRON 02/28/2000 01:58 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Backing up Dave
FYI:
Dave will be on Vacation March 10th thru the 17th, since you currently have
no vacation booked Brenda is depending on you backing him up. If you see any
possible conflicts with this please let me know.
Y | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 02:56 PM -----
Eric Thode@ENRON
10/18/2000 02:54 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: San Diego Union Tribune
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Thode/Corp/Enron on 10/18/2000 02:55
PM ---------------------------
Eric Thode
10/18/2000 02:41 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: San Diego Union Tribune
Have you seen this?
Eric
Power-company profits climb along with prices
By Craig D. Rose
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
October 18, 2000
A power company executive yesterday boiled California's ongoing electricity
crisis down to the bottom line.
"Prices are rising, and I know that's hurting consumers ) but it certainly
has been beneficial for Enron," said Jeffrey Skilling,
president and chief operating officer of the Houston-based energy and trading
company. Enron declined to specify how
much it earned from California during the past summer, when the state's
deregulated electricity market sent power prices
soaring. But the Texas company did say that profits of its sales and services
unit ) which trades California electricity and o
ther commodities ) increased 135 percent to $404 million.
Dynegy Inc., also based in Houston, reported that income from its marketing
and trade unit soared more than 300 percent to $142 million. Steve
Bergstrom, president of Dynegy, said California was perhaps only the
third-biggest contributor to that surge. But industry analysts said the
earnings
reports are the first indication of a pattern expected in coming weeks.
"California clearly drove the positive momentum at both of these companies,"
said Carol Coale, senior analyst of Prudential
Securities. "And you probably just saw the beginning of a string of strong
reports (from the power industry)." She and others
say they suspect that power companies derived billions in profits from the
state, where tight supplies set the stage for huge price increases.
Companies did not necessarily have to own generating plants to profit from
the deregulated market. Enron produces no electricity in California
but is the nation's largest electricity trader, buying and selling the output
of power plants owned by other companies.
Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-El Cajon, said the big profits should be seen in
something other than a business context. "These massive profits
by the energy companies translate directly into thousands of San Diegans
losing savings that were planned for education, mortgage
payments, health care and other . . . necessities," Hunter said.
When the state power exchange saw dramatic price increases within a matter of
hours, "it was clear that predatory pricing was producing
massive profits for someone," Hunter said. Hunter insists that recent power
prices violate federal law mandating that rates be "just and reasonable."
He is calling for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to order refunds.
FERC is scheduled to issue a report on the California market by Nov. 1.
The political fallout from the price increases, meanwhile, appears to weigh
heavily on power companies, which are reluctant to tout successes in
California for fear of being singled out for profiteering.
After noting that Dynegy's recent acquisitions in Illinois contributed
strongly to the company's success last quarter, Bergstrom was reminded that
he
had omitted mention of California.
"Illinois is not as politically volatile as California," Bergstrom said.
He acknowledged that Dynegy did "pretty well" in California because its power
plants produced far more electricity this year than last. Bergstrom
also sought to correct an earlier report that Dynegy had quickly recouped the
cost of power plants it recently acquired in the state.
He said that was true only of the plants it owns in Long Beach and El
Segundo, which it bought in 1998. Bergstrom said the cost of Dynegy's half
interest
in the former San Diego Gas & Electric Encina power plant in Carlsbad )
acquired at the end of 1998 ) had not been recovered.
Typically, plant operators assume that it will take as long as 20 years to
recoup such costs.
In comments to financial analysts, Skilling, of Enron, suggested that power
companies could help provide a solution to California's power problems.
"Supply constraints and the resulting price pressures in California and other
locations have demonstrated the need for skilled marketers like Enron
to provide reliable power and stable prices," Skilling said. He predicted
that California's utility companies ) which now buy much of their power from
other companies ) would sign long-term contracts to stabilize prices,
following an approach suggested by many power generators and traders.
"If they were willing to extend the terms of their purchases to 10-year
contracts, then they could get contracts for $50 a megawatt, which is not
much
different than they were paying two or three years ago," Skilling said.
But consumer advocates have noted that long-term contracts at those levels
would lock consumers into price increases and leave them with little
choice about suppliers. Advocates of electrical deregulation had predicted
that introducing competition would lead to reductions in power costs
and to greater consumer choice.
Harry Snyder, senior advocate for Consumers Union in San Francisco, said he
was skeptical of solutions proposed by the power industry.
"Any proposal from the industry has to be suspect because they have engaged
in faking out the California public and price gouging when there
are shortages," said Snyder, who advocates an end to deregulation.
"They do not have consumer interests at heart." | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This is the first of several contracts I need you to alter to make specific
between HPL and a third party counterpart, taking out the Enron and its
affiliate spin. Please forward your altered draft back to me when
completed. Send to [email protected] with a copy to [email protected]. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 08:39 AM -----
Sara Shackleton
06/21/2000 08:39 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Differences
Jason: Please stay in touch with Sarah. We really do need to finalize with
Bank One by Friday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 08:38 AM -----
Sarah Wesner@ENRON
06/20/2000 07:24 PM
To: Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Differences
Joe - attached is a first shot at getting a handle on all the differences
between the proposed and existing margin lines. I plan to do more analysis
with respect to covenants and warranties but this hits the main points. The
analysis between rates will be very complex and may be something best left to
the research Group. We can go through why this is such a complex issue to
model. What I do plan to do is update historical info. so that based on the
past we can make general statements such as over time Fed Funds + X bp <,>,=
to LIBOR + X bp.
A quick synapses of difficult items:
Commissions vs. Margin lines - will trading desk use facility for many trades
or less frequent trades for smaller amounts
Short on Financial gas vs. Long on physical gas - cash flow differentials and
how we can model the cost of cash to fund the working capital (as you
explained to me today)
What positions the trader take and how our equity position is at that exact
time. Will we trade in a similar fashion in the future?
From what I understand the trading desks do not have ready access to the
above information in a format which lends itself to modelling of reasonable
complexity or do not wish to share it with us (understandable considering the
sensitive nature of the business.) The ideal situation would be for the
desks to decide themselves whether a line makes sense for them based on the
pricing provided. As mentioned above, I believe that we should be able to
explain why a certain base rate would be attractive but am not sure how to
estimate the value of a line to the traders without detailed information.
Perhaps the best division of labour would be for the desks to decide what
loan would be most valuable based on the desk's trading patterns while we
could focus on getting the line in place as quickly as possible. If you
disagree, please let me know and I will try to rethink how to model this
appropriately.
Sarah | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Can you please review and get back to Tim?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
-----Original Message-----
From: DeSpain, Tim <[email protected]>
To: Hayslett, Rod <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon Nov 19 10:08:16 2001
Subject: FW: credit updates
Please review the one page updates for Transwestern and Northern and let me know if you have any comments.
Thanks,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: credit updates
Tim: Attached are updates I mentioned yesterday.
(See attached file: enronrpt.doc)(See attached file: northernnatural.doc)
(See attached file: transwestern.doc) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
ATTENTION ANALYST ROTATING WITHIN THE NEXT 2 TO 3 MONTHS
Portland is a small ENA office with approximately 100 employees in power and
origination for the western region of the United States. The office is
managed by Tim Belden and Chris Calger with the following business units:
West Power Trading, Scheduling, Middle Market, Real Time, Fundamental
Analysis, Settlements, Risk Management, and Western Origination.
Because of the size and lay-out of the Portland office, Analysts are
presented with some unique opportunities which may not be experienced in
other departments at Enron:
strong sense of teamwork.
ability to interact with other departments on a regular basis.
strong commitment to the development of talent.
ability to rotate within the Portland office to other key functions.
Please see the following job descriptions for available position:
ENA - Transaction Group - Jonalan Page
- Assist Originators with analysis, evaluation and structuring potential
deals
- Modeling
- Interacting with support functions such as tax, accounting and legal
- Support divestiture efforts regarding the sale of Western
Origination's assets | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 02:51 PM -----
"Fergus, Gary S." <[email protected]>
02/01/2001 02:15 PM
To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc: "Mark Haedicke (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
Subject: Withdrawal from PX Core Market
Richard,
Here is my quick reaction to the idea of Enron terminating its PX
participation agreement in the Core Market:
1. PX tariff 18.3 says that a participation agreement "may be
terminated by either party upon written notice."
2. PX tariff 5.3 says with respect to the Core Market
Proportional Charge-Back Methodology:
"The PX Participant's outstanding default amount will be
charged back to all current PX Participants based upon the percentage of its
gross sales in MWHs to the Total gross MWHs sales in the Core Market during
the three calendar months preceding the event plus the current month to
date."
3. PX Participant is a defined term:
"An entity that is authorized to buy or sell Energy or
Ancillary Services through the PX, and any agent authorized to act on behalf
of such entity."
4. Energy is also a defined term:
"The electrical energy produced, flowing or supplied by
generation, transmission or distribution facilities, being the integral with
respect to time of the instantaneous power, measured in units of watt-hours
or standard multiples thereof, e.g. 1000 Wh.
5. Ancillary services is also a defined term:
"Regulation, Spinning Reserve, Non-Spinning Reserve,
Replacement Reserve, Voltage Support and Black start together with such
other interconnected operation services as the ISO may develop in
cooperation with Market Participants to support the transmission of Energy
from Generation resources to Loads while maintaining reliable operation of
the ISO controlled grid in accordance with good utility practice."
Bottom line:
If a PX Participant, as defined in the PX tariff as opposed
to the PX rate schedule for the CTS market, is an entity that is authorized
to buy or sell "instantaneous power" rather than power in the future, then
Enron by withdrawing from its PX participation agreement would no longer be
a current PX participant. Thus, there is an argument that by withdrawing in
writing prior to any chargeback in the core market, that Enron may be able
to argue it cannot be charged back.
I also looked at the ADR and dispute resolution procedures
to see if Enron had to be PX Participant to initiate the procedure and
maintain it. Schedule 9 section 1.1 states that PX ADR procedures shall
apply to all disputes between parties which arise under PX Documents.
Section 2.1 states that the "PX and PX Participants shall negotiate in good
faith..." It goes on to state in Section 2.2 that "any one of the parties"
may submit a statement of claim. Thereafter, in Schedule 9 it appears that
the references are to parties not PX Participants. My quick reading is that
you still have to use and get the benefits of the ADR even if you are no
longer a PX Participant.
Operational Downside:
Does Enron have to be a PX Participant to get the PX to
schedule the power that Enron has sold in the CTS market as it becomes due?
In other words, if Enron is not a PX Participant, does that mean the PX will
not schedule the power leading to an Enron default under its obligations to
the PX to deliver power? Could that lead to the underscheduling penalty if
PX balances its schedule without Enron's power? I do not know the answer
to this but I am reviewing the tariff.
Hope this helps
Thanks
Gary
=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.
To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
[email protected]
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Audrey, one more name in addition to the ones I've already given you.... please add Elizabeth Brown on the invite list. Thanks, Kim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson, Audrey
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Cc: Harris, Steven
Subject: Appreciation Outing for ETS' TW Teams
Kim, Steve want's to have an appreciation outing for all of ETS' TW Teams (i.e., Mkt Svcs, Facility Planning, Contracts, Shelley Corman, Lynn Blair, Steve January, Rick Dietz - 38 total) on Friday, September 7, 2001, 11:30a - 5:00p.
Tentative reservations are made at "Julian's" on the Katy Freeway, near IKEA. I would like for you to assist me in finalizing my list of invitees. Please see list below and let me know if concur:
Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Asante, Ben
Betancourt, Ramona
Burleson, Bob
Centilli, James
Corman, Shelley
Doll, Jeanette
Donoho, Lindy
Faucheaux, Eric
Frazier, Perry
Geaccone, Tracy
Goradia, Palu
Gottsponer, Morgan
Graves, Jerry
Harris, Steven
Hass, Glen
Keller, John
Kowalke, Terry
Lindberg, Lorraine
Lohman, TK
Lokay, Michelle
Matthews, Ron
Moore, Jan
Pryor, Tony
Rice, Randy
Robertson, Audrey
Schoolcraft, Darrell
Veatch, Stephen
Watson, Kimberly
Blair, Lynn
January, Steve
Dietz, Rick
Laura Giambrone
Bert Hernandez
Christine McEvoy
Beverly Miller
Tracy Minter
Amy Mulligan
Linda Ward
Michelle Cormier
Dennis Lee
Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address: [email protected]
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
If all of marketing is in agreement and we can demonstrate the elements sufficently to include in the filing. How will this work in the field area?? Doesn't this conceptually give everyone the same priority or we narrowing it down to within the MID? MK
-----Steve Kirk/NNG/Dynegy wrote: -----
To: Maria Pavlou/NNG/Dynegy
From: Steve Kirk/NNG/Dynegy
Date: 02/21/2002 05:52PM
cc: Dave Neubauer/NNG/Dynegy, Mary Kay Miller/NNG/Dynegy, Michele Winckowski/NNG/Dynegy, Mary Darveaux/NNG/Dynegy, Kathy Patton/DEC/Dynegy, Jo Williams/NNG/Dynegy, Kent Miller/NNG/Dynegy, John Dushinske/NNG/Dynegy, Ranelle Paladino/NNG/Dynegy, Frank Semin/NNG/Dynegy, John Pritchard/NNG/Dynegy, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Maria Pavlou/NNG/Dynegy
Subject: Re: Draft Order No. 637 Filing
In our meetings today on Order No. 637, we failed to discuss the topic of alternate point priorities "within-the-path". Marketing indicated in a meeting yesterday that they would like a change to alternate rights in the Market Area. That change would provide that use of an alternate point within the operational zone where the shipper's primary rights are located would have priority over alternate rights in an operational zone where the shipper doesn't have primary. This means we would have another level of alternate to be added to the tariff. For example, if Minnegasco made an alternate nomination in Zone D at E.Dubuque, they would have a lower alternate right than Wisconsin Gas at E.Dubuque.
Please provide any comments you have on this issue along with your other comments requested to be provided to Maria by COB on Monday.
p.s. I recognize this would fall into the category of "needing system changes so it may take awhile". | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
i feel like a champ today | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
El Paso has postponed Line 1300 and Line 1301 maintenance projects on the San
Juan Crossover until February. Flagstaff Station and the Navajo 2D turbine
will be down Jan. 22-23, cutting North Mainline capacity by 50 MMcf/d. One
Rio Vista turbine will be down Jan. 22-25, limiting capacity of the IEXCPT37
and IGCNMX37 interconnects to a total of 125 MMcf/d. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Broker is correct - I've changed these deals to May.
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
04/26/2001 02:48 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: apb
594290
594291
broker has may on these deals. these were the ones i was missing on the
previous email.
thanks | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Harib,
Attached is the latest update for the DPC project. A printed copy of project
photos is being forwarded to you seperately. If you have any questions,
please feel free to call me at 713 345-5855.
Best Regards,
Paul | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please respond to Your complete travel itinerary is brought to you by Sabre Virtually There and
MURDOCK TRAVEL-FOR GREAT TRAVEL DEALS GET ON OUR FAX BLAST LIST. Use the link
below to display your trip plans as well as useful destination information
including weather, maps, driving directions, gate assignments and much more.
https://www.virtuallythere.com/cgi-bin/nph-itinerary?pnr=SOHOQR&name=SALISBURY&language=0&email=2&part=AA&ph=1W
Check this link often for any changes or updates to your trip.
If for any reason the above link is not active you can access your trip plans at
www.virtuallythere.com. Simply enter reservation code SOHOQR and the passenger's
last name.
MURDOCK TRAVEL-FOR GREAT TRAVEL DEALS GET ON OUR FAX BLAST LIST
CALL 800-365-7747X5763
ALSO VISIT US ON OUR WEBSITE AT WWW.MURDOCKTRAVEL.COM | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
i want to bid 10 on jeff feagles. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Wendi: Following is a quick message I shot off to Caroline. She will wait
for us to call.
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001 11:38 AM -----
Sara Shackleton
03/02/2001 11:24 AM
To: Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: RE: POA/ Cargill line...
I think these guys are trying to create a $35M line ($15M Collateral
Threshold from the ISDA Credit Support Annex and a separate $20M line for the
Global agency trading). All trading with Cargill will be subject to the ISDA
Master Agreement and Credit Support Annex.
Wendi and I discussed briefly and we'll call you later. It seems that Wendi
has spoken with Mark Rubenstein who handles credit and there is some
confusion.
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
Caroline Abramo@ENRON
03/02/2001 10:46 AM
To: Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: POA/ Cargill line...
what do you think?
---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron on 03/02/2001
11:44 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 03/02/2001 10:39:03 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: RE: POA/ Cargill line...
Currently Cargill and Enron have a 15MM collateral threshold. If
possible, I think the cleanest way to run this biz would be to put a
box around the prime broker biz. We would still operate under the
master isda but could set up a mutually agreeable credit support annex
for this biz. We would still keep the 20,000,000 line referenced in
Schedule B of the POA agreement. The line in the POA is a seperate and
distinct measure from the daily collateral. The 20 mill reflects gross
exposure. Let me know if you think this is reasonable and workable.
We too, are open to suggestion as the Global and Enron relationships
are very important and a high priority to us.
Thanks
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 7:26 AM
To: lardy, joe /xtwn
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: POA/ Cargill line...
Joe- a few things regading the POA/ Cargill line..
I am going to find out how much line we currently have available... you
probably already have this. We should allocate a piece to Global which
would solve the problem of other Cargill people using the line, putting
us
over the limit, without me knowing...
We could change the language of the POA to this... we will not go over
Global's piece of the Cargill line...I think this would solve our main
concern...
Please let me know... we are eager to keep trading with Global and
yourselves...
Regards,
Caroline | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is Chris' rewrite of Section 9.
Ross M. Levine, Esq.
Director of Contracts and Contracts Counsel
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
3 Great Pasture Rd.
Danbury, CT 06813
(203) 825-6057
(203) 798-2945 (fax)
[email protected] (email)
This transmittal and its attached files (if any) may contain proprietary or
confidential information belonging to FuelCell Energy, Inc. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
transmittal in error. Any review, disclosure, use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you
suspect that you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at 1-(203) 825-6000, or e-mail at [email protected] and
immediately delete this message and all its attachments.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bentley, Chris
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 4:35 PM
> To: Levine, Ross
> Subject: Section 9
>
> <<Inspection Section.doc>>
> Chris
- Inspection Section.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I'd like a schedule c (or any other schedule we have) update. Also, how do
we start to accrue for bonuses for 2001? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jay -
Thanks for your note. This definitely falls into the "(b)" category. The
problem is that there are sooooo many things in the b pile already that I
can't tell you exactly when this will be resolved.
Having said that, I agree that the weather information is probably the least
risky, but it might be helpful if you were to visit their sites and see if
there is any comment about further use of the information posted there. As
for the others, a little additional information would be helpful. For
instance, I know we were in discussions with NGTL at one time and were
unwilling to sign the letter they asked for. Was there ever any follow-up
with them on that? Is there any correspondence at all (it doesn't have to
look like an official contract). Is the Telerate information also available
from other sources? Is it possible that Telerate gets it out really fast and
that is their advantage but others are right behind with the same or very
similar information? Do we have an agreement of any kind with Telerate
regarding the services they provide to us?
Thanks for your help and continuing attention to this - I agree we should be
trying to do this the "right" way.
Mark
James Bruce 03/30/2000 02:33 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Legal Issues with EnronOnline Newsticker
Dear Mark (back from South America?)
I received this email from Donna Greif. It explains the sources for her data
which she puts on EnronOnline every day. As best I know, Mark, we don't have
any agreement with any of these people for content that we place online.
I'm not too concerned about the weather (it's from the Canadian and American
governments) but I am concerned about the NGTL data and the data we get from
Telerate.
We have a disclaimer Online for the NGTL data, saying that it's our
reproduction and not a representation of what they have on their own site
(their own site which can be accessed through a password only!), but I think
this proves, rather than refutes, the fact that we're redistributing their
data without a right to do so. The same applies for Telerate--we don't even
give them recognition--we just post their numbers on our site.
I know you're a busy man, and I'm sure you're dealing with things like
lawsuits against Enron by South American governments, or something like that,
but this issue should (a) be dropped, because you believe that it's really
not that important or (b) resolved, becuase you think it is.
Please tell me how I can help, or if we should let this issue drop. If I
don't hear from you, I'll assume that you don't think it's an important issue.
Thanks
Jay
---------------------- Forwarded by James Bruce/LON/ECT on 30/03/2000 09:20
---------------------------
To: James Bruce/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Candace Spencer/CAL/ECT@ECT, Terri Brian/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ross
Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EnronOnline Newsticker
Jay,
In your original email (attached below), you requested my source of US Nat
Gas Stats that are posted as a newsticker item on the website. Please note,
I would have been more than happy to provide you with source details on the
Canadian Weather Forecasts and NGTL Pipeline Data if it was part of your
original request.
US Natural Gas Statistics (Gas in Storage & Cumulative Heating Degree Days)
* My source is the Producer Newsletter distributed by the Mid-Marketing
Department (Ross Prevatt & Dan Diamond
are both part of that team). For your convenience, I've attached a copy
for your records
* The Producer Newsletter is distributed on a weekly basis (Monday nights or
Tuesday morning)
and is faxed.
- the Mid-Marketing Department gets those numbers from several
different sources.
- I called Ross again today to re-verify. He confirmed the following
for me:
* Gas Storage data comes from a direct feed from Telerate.
* Lucy Oritz passes on the cumulative heating degree days to Ross.
> Her source is National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration
> web address = http://www.crh.noaa.gov/grr/wfolocat.htm
- Should you require any additional details and need to make contact
with Ross again.....
I did take the liberty of explaining who you are, the group you
represent as well as
why you were needing this information. I am sure he will be fully
receptive and understand
the nature of your question should you need to contact him again.
Canadian Weather Forecasts (4 day forecast for 5 cities)
NGTL Pipeline Data (Prior day deliveries, etc.)
* Candace Spencer & Terri Brian in Enron Canada's office pull this
information from two different sources.
* They pull this information together, and fax updates us each morning.
- NGTL Pipeline Data is pulled from
http://www.nrgexpressway.com/ngtl/index.htm
* You must have a password to gain access to this information.
- Canadian Weather Forecast data is pulled from
http://weather.ec.gc.ca/alberta_e.shtml
* Upon reaching the site, you would select the appropriate City.
* Once in the city, scroll down to get the weather forecast data.
My apologies for any mis-communications on your original request. Feel free
to call me if you are in need of more
details (x3-9517).
Thanks,
dg
P.S. Currently, Noel Petterson is updating the website. His back-up is Matt
Motsinger. In additions (just an FYI), this
will be my last week with the EnronOnline team. Please forward any future
requests to Frank Davis.
==========================================================================
James Bruce 03/29/2000 09:48 AM
To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline Newsticker
Following our exchange of emails two weeks ago, I spoke with Ross (whom you
suggested), but he didn't know of you & didn't think that anything he
produced was sent to you. He suggested that I contact Dan Diamond, who wrote
back saying that he didn't know anything either but that I should contact
Rahil Jafry. The only problem of course is that I work with Rahil, and I'm
trying to find this information in response to a discussion that I had with
him!
So, could you tell me exactly where you get your information from, for the
following items:
Canadian Weather Forecasts (4 day forecast for 5 cities)
NGTL Pipeline Data (Prior day deliveries, etc.)
US Natural Gas Stastics (Gas in Storage & Cumulative Heating Degree Days)
Even if you don't know the specific source, if you could tell me how you get
the information, then I'll try to follow it up. So, for example, 'Each day
at 6am I receive a fax from 713.853.2297 with a list of numbers. I take
these numbers and put them in the Canadian ...'
Sorry to keep bothering you, but this is a potentially serious issue for
us--we need to know exactly where we're getting our content from, and no one
seems to know! So anything that you can do to help would be appreciated
greatly.
Thanks in advance
Jay
==========================================================================
From: Donna Greif 03/13/2000 10:30 AM
The EnronOnline team gets those numbers from the weekly Newsletter
distributed the ENA Commercial Team. Ross Prevatt is the individual who
actually puts the information together.
In talking with Ross this morning, that information is taken from a Telerate
feed (the Telerate feeder gets the info from daily/weekly/monthly
publications). Ross did not give me the specific companies that publish the
information. Feel free to call Ross directly if you need additional
information.
Thanks,
dg
==========================================================================
James Bruce 03/13/2000 04:05 AM
Dear Donna
(Following the voicemail that I left for you on Friday) I was wondering if
you could tell me whether or not the US Gas Storage data & the cumulative
CDD/HDD data are taken from inside Enron only? (I'm asking because Paul
Goddard has encouraged me to update our letters of consent for content that
we carry on the website.)
Many thanks,
Jay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Yes we do care. The question is: are we going to do anything? Robin and
Richard will be discussing this this afternoon.
The CPUC's motion only applied to the generators, not the ISO. I guess the
ISO was viewed as cooperating.
Susan J Mara@ENRON
12/13/2000 09:56 AM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: CAISO Notice: Message to Market Participants and Scheduling Coord
inators regarding CA ISO compliance with the EOB and CPUC subpoenas -- FOR
YOUR INFORMATION
The ISO plans to comply with recent EOB and CPUC subpoenas unless FERC or a
court tells them not to. DO we care about this?
Question for Mary and Ron -- Are they trying to get around the FERC-- given
the CPUC's filing there asking for authority to get info?
Also, as Mary is aware, the WPTF will be submitting a protest to SCE's
request to FERC to have the ISO's MSC release data to SCE that the MSC claims
identify those who have abused market power.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 09:47 AM -----
"Fuller, Don" <[email protected]>
Sent by: "Happ, Susan" <[email protected]>
12/13/2000 07:52 AM
Please respond to "Sole, Jeanne"
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: Message to Market Participants and Scheduling Coord
inators regarding CA ISO compliance with the EOB and CPUC subpoenas
To Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:
The CA ISO believes it has complied with its obligations under CA ISO Tariff
section 20.3.4 as to the December 4 EOB subpoena and the September 21 CPUC
subpoena. Our reasoning is explained in the attached letter. Accordingly,
the CA ISO will comply with the EOB and CPUC subpoenas on December 20
unless it receives and order to the contrary from a court or the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission.
In addition, the CA ISO has received requests from the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission and the state agencies for information on generator
unit outages. This information is not subject to tariff section 20.3.4
which protects only Generator Outage programs. Nonetheless, the CA ISO is
providing this notice as a curtesy matter. The CA ISO will provide the
requested information to FERC and the state agencies. The CA ISO has in the
past requested confidential treatment for information on the cause of an
outage and projected in service date since this information could be used by
Market Participants to manipulate the market, and it will make such a
request as to cause and in service dates in the context of the current
requests.
Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________
The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges. Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.
- 12-12letter to genfinal.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks for the commnets, Lynn.
I've faxed you a copy of "Plan B."
I'll let others chime in, but ideally it seemsthat we'd want to start the
meetings next week and have at least the rough outline of a proposed,
comprehensive solution to put on the table for discussion. But at a minimum
we'd want to get "the process" nailed down by very early next week.
Best,
Jeff
[email protected]
05/15/2001 07:34 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Summary of Today's Call/Agenda for Tomorrow's Call
Jeff,
Sorry I was unable to make the call yesterday. Thanks for the summary. My
comments and questions are indicated below.
Please fax a copy of Plan B to be at 713 767 6677.
You suggest starting the "process" in Sacramento next week. I'm not
sure exactly what this means. Are we saying we will have a proposal
or that we will be advocating a process/forum to get all the right
parties at the table?
Did we set a time for the next call on Friday?
With regard to the Issues list, here are a few extra items:
need to make clear that real price signals should be sent to all
sectors (not just those that wouldn't vote for Davis anyway) as
soon as possible
I cannot imagine a situation in which the IOUs are returned to
financial stability within 3-6 months; my guess is that it will
be at least a year
if IOUs are returned to the procurement role, we need to make
sure that they have the appropriate risk management tools
(ability to enter forward contracts, options, etc.)
if IOUs are returned to the procurement role, we also need to
have assurances that the situation we have today won't happen
again; for example, if the state assigns the CDWR contracts to
the IOUs and three years from now the market price is less than
the contract price, what assurances does anyone have that the PUC
will not try to make the IOUs absorb the difference
If we want to go to a core/non-core approach, why do we need to
wait 18-24 months; it seems to me that we could start that
process now
As for legal claims and investigations, we need to make clear
that we want to resolve all state and federal claims; the civil
claims present a different set of challenges for resolution
as for discounts on receivables, I'm not ready to commit one way
or another; however, if there are discounts they must apply to
all market participants - not just the ones that Davis can get to
the table.
Lynn
[email protected] on 05/14/2001 08:47:31 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Summary of Today's Call/Agenda for Tomorrow's Call
Greetings:
n order to keep everyone in the loop, the folks on today's call wanted to
send out a brief summary of the call for the benefit of those who couldn't
make it. Apologies for any omissions, inaccuracies, etc. Others who were
on the call please chime in if I've gotten anything wrong, or missed
anything.
Best,
Jeff
SUMMARY
Enron, Duke, El Paso and Williams were on the call, as was Michael
Hoffman of the Blackstone Group (the Governor's financial advisors).
On the subject of how the group would organize itself, it was agreed
that the calls would be open to anyone who wanted to participate.
A smaller group consisting of Duke, El Paso, Enron, and Williams would
take the lead on walking the halls of Sacramento, meeting with policy
makers, and advocating whatever plan the group develops.
Folks agreed that achieving a comprehesive solution requires a tangible
process; that is, the principals need to get in a room, face to face,
for however long it takes to work out a resolution.
It was agreed that the process should start no later than the beginning
of next week, and that it should take place in Sacramento.
It was decided that the Legislature and the Attorney General needed to
be brought into the process as soon as possible, i.e., next week.
There was some discussion regarding the release today of "Plan B." Plan
B is a plan proposed by Democratic and Republican legislators as an
alternative to the MOU that the Governor struck with Edison. After that
call I received a copy of "Plan B." If you'd like a copy please send me
your fax number.
Folks on the call agreed to have the next "supplier-only" call-in
meeting on Friday.
Finally, Michael Hoffman said that they are hoping to have a "ratings
agency level" presentation prepared by the end of the week. The goal of
the presentation is to reassure capital markets that the bonds the state
seeks to issue are solidly backed by retail rates.
The Agenda for Tomorrow's Call with the Governor's Staff
Item #1: The Credit Issue
Michael Hoffman said that the Governor's office wants to start
tomorrow's meeting discussing the creditworthiness issue.
Hoffman said that the Governor's folks are hoping to have completed by
the start of tomorrow's meeting a draft of an agreement between the
California PUC and CDWR. The agreement is designed to ensure that DWR
gets paid for power services delivered.
If the draft is ready, they'd like to discuss on the call tomorrow.
Item #2: Identify the Components of a Comprehensive Solution.
It was agreed that our group should put on the table at tomorrow's
meeting the universe of issues that need to be included in a
comprehensive solution.
Enron was asked to take a first stab at what those components are. The
following is a brief outline, which is not intended to be definitive,
but a starting point for discussion.
Utility creditworthiness
retail rates must reflect costs
Increase supply
streamline and otherwise reform the siting process
Decrease demand
establish real-time pricing
implement demand buy-down and other conservation programs
Create a real market
Remove the State from the power-buying business as soon as possible
(e.g., once new rates are in place and utilities are returned to
creditworthiness; approximately 3-6 months)
Return the procurement role to the utilities
Reinstate Direct Access immediately for all customers
Within 18-24 months, create a "core/noncore" market structure for
electricity, similar to California's market structure for natural
gas
Keep the industry in the hands of the private sector
Reject proposals calling on the State to take over transmission,
generation, etc.
Resolve outstanding legal claims, investigations, etc.
Resolution requires certainty and prompt payment (understanding
that discounts on receivables is on the table for discussion) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I don't know what to do. Boss says I don't need to look for a job and they will have to find some $$ to keep people. don't know that I want to be among the 7000 enron employees beating the streets. Any suggestions? there have been no formal announcements of layoffs but Logically, I feel like about 50% of my friends here will loose their jobs. Especially the ones not associated with gas or power. The world is in turmoil! Wish I had my sailboat and 6 mos. $$ to live on - I would go to the caribbean and stay for a while.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Strickland <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject: RE: humor_bin.swf
so what are you going to do now? have they made any kind of announcements
or anything?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:02 AM
To: Angie Conner (E-mail); Chris Todd (E-mail); David Hutchens (E-mail);
Elizabeth Jordan (E-mail); Eric Strickland (E-mail); Harriet Turk
(E-mail); Jerry Ward (E-mail); John Schilke (E-mail); Melissa Reese
(E-mail); Shawn McElmoyl (E-mail); Susie LeJune (E-mail); Theresa Cline
(E-mail); Tina lovett (E-mail); Wes Kersey (E-mail)
Subject: FW: humor_bin.swf
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miller, Stephanie
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:57 AM
> To: Tycholiz, Barry; Polsky, Phil; Ward, Kim S (Houston)
> Subject: FW: humor_bin.swf
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jones, Susan" <[email protected]>@ENRON
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:43 AM
> To: Miller, Stephanie
> Subject: FW: humor_bin.swf
>
>
>
> here's my little bin laden video, hope you enjoy it!!
>
>
> http://www.madblast.com/oska/humor_bin.swf
>
>
>
> PG&E National Energy Group and any other
> company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
> logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
> Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither
> PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
> referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
> Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
> do not have to buy products from these companies in order
> to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.
>
> - humor_bin.swf.url <<humor_bin.swf.url>>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Barbara,
The information requested in Specification 13 is readily ascertainable from
the Transaction Agreements for the Entex contracts supplied pursuant to
Specification 3.
Dan | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here are the test deals we completed today. Please check these deals in the appropriate downstream systems to make sure they are bridging into tagg, sitara and enpower correctly. Beware that some of these deals are duplicates. Let me know if any of these are bridging incorrectly so that I can get the programmers to look at it.
O'Neal, please pay special attention to the gas daily deals. I believe that I tested the one leg, two leg and four leg gas daily deals.
Thanks,
Dawn
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenne, Dawn C.
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:01 PM
To: Smith, Regan M.; Pena, Matt
Cc: Meredith, Kevin; Lozano, Melba; Denny, Jennifer
Subject: Simulation testing
I am attaching both gas and power transaction summaries. Please let me know how everything looks downstream and if we need to test anything else.
Dawn
3-9353 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
If you have any questions, please contact me at 713-859-6266.
See you in the morning!
Amy | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
http://vortex.plymouth.edu/uschill.gif | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
What do you think of this:
As mentioned during the fourth quarter, Gary and I would like to begin
regular meetings of our Trader's Roundtable. The ideas generated from this
group should be longer term trading opportunities for Enron covering most of
the markets we manage. In addition, this forum will provide for cross
commodity education, insight into many areas of Enron's businesses, and
promote aggressive ideas.
Each week, we'll summarize commodity trading activity, and provide an open
forum for discussion. Your input is valuable, and we've limited this group
to our most experienced traders, and would appreciate regular participation.
Our first meeting will be Tuesday, January 9 at 4:00pm in room 3321. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
you remember cinderella as a rock band and not a fairy tale
-----Original Message-----
From: Bhatia, Randy
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:04 AM
To: Worthing, Ashley; O'Rourke, Ryan; Keiser, Kam; Jones, Monte; Clause, Kristen; Jones, Brad; Lenhart, Matthew; Wolfe, Jason; Blanchard, Timothy; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Subject: FW: The 80's - Try this one
You know you grew up in the '80s if....
You ever ended your sentence with "psych"
You solved the Rubiks cube by peeling off the stickers
You watched the pound puppies
You can sing the rap to "the Fresh Prince of Bel-Air"
You wore biker shorts under your skirts and felt stylish
You yearned to be a member of the Baby-sitters club and tried to
start a club of your own.
You owned those little Strawberry Shortcake pals scented dolls
You know who Six is from Blossom
Three words: M.C. Hammer
You can sing the entire theme song to "Duck Tales"
If you played the chipmunks Christmas album all year long!
The crypt keeper really freaked you out
Remember reading Kool-Aid man comics
You ever watched Fraggle Rock
You had plastic streamers on the handlebars of your bike
When it was actually worth getting up early on a Saturday to watch
cartoons
You wore a ponytail to the side of your head
You saw the original Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles on the big screen
You got super-excited when it was Oregon Trail day in computer class
at school
You made your mom buy you one of those clips that would hold your
shirt in a knot on the side
You had a Kirk Cameron poster on your bedroom wall
You played the game "Mash" with friends at school
You wore a Jordache jean jacket and you were proud of L.A. GEAR
Your mother wouldn't let you have garbage pail kids
You remember reading "Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing" and all the
Ramona books
You know the profound meaning of "Wax on, Wax off"
You wanted to be a Goonie
You ever wore fluorescent, neon if you will, clothing
You wanted to be on StarSearch
You can remember what Michael Jackson looked like before his nose
fell off
You took Lunch boxes to school
You have ever pondered why Smurfette was the ONLY female smurf
You remember the craze, and then the banning of slap bracelets
You still get the urge to use "NOT" at the end of every statement
you make
You remember Hypercolor T-shirts
Barbie and the Rockers was your favorite band
You remember Punky Brewster
You loved Howard the duck
You thought Sheera and He-man should hook up
You thought your childhood friends would never leave because you
exchanged "friendship bracelets"
You ever owned a pair of Jelly Shoes
After you saw Pee-Wee's Big Adventure you couldn't stop saying "I
know you are but what am I?"
You remember "I've fallen...and I can't get up!"
When you watched Family Matters and wanted to beat Steve Urkels ass
You remember going to the skating rink before there were inline
skates
You ever got seriously injured on a slip and slide
You know not to mix poprocks and soda
You have played with a 'skip-it'
You had or went to a birthday party at McDonald's
If you've ever wanted to go to Degrassi Junior High
You ever sat on or used one knee on a skateboard
You learned oldies songs by watching Alvin and the Chipmunks
You had a Glow Worm or watched the cartoon
You remember dancing along with the Bangles in "Walk Like An
Egyptian"
If you remember Heathcliff the orange cat
You saw the California Raisins Christmas claymation special
You've gone through this list occasionally saying
"That wasn't from the 80's"
You remember Popples
DON'T WORRY, BE HAPPY!!!!!!!!!!!!
You wore socks over tights with high-top Reeboks
You wore like 8 pairs of socks at once, scrunched down
MISS MARY MACK MACK MACK ALL DRESSED IN BLACK BLACK BLACK.....
You remember boom boxes instead of CD players
You remember watching both "Gremlins" movies
You remember the gimp fad
You remember the Transformers
You had to buy a pair of overalls when everyone started wearing them
You knew what it meant to say: "Care bear stare!!" and you had a
favorite
You remember Rainbow Bright and MY Little Pony
You remember watching TV thinking Doogie Howser was hot!
You remember Alf, the little furry brown alien from Malmac
You remember the large amounts of hairspray used
You remember those very stylish headbands
You remember Vicky the Robot
You remember Eve Garland from Out of this World and how she could
stop time by pressing the tips of her index fingers together and
talking to her dad through a glowing cube in her bedroom
You remember the beginning of New Kids on the Block
You remember watching The Cosby show
You remember Mr.Belvedere
You remember Michael J. Fox in Family Ties and Back to the Future
_________________________________________________________________ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sally still ahs not received the list. Do you have it in a form you can e-mail to her?
- | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
It will be in 38C1 beginning at 11 am CT tommorrow.
-----Original Message-----
From: Holtzman, Staci
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Nemec, Gerald
Subject: Tomorrow's deposition
Gerald - I know you've told me this before, but I didn't put it in my calendar. What time and where is tomorrow's telephone depo? Thanks. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here's the option we discussed yesterday. It has some farm tenancy stuff
which I want to make sure you see.
Thanks,
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/30/2001 11:58
AM ---------------------------
"Way, Karen S. - CHI" <[email protected]> on 01/30/2001 10:53:27 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Titan-Schaeffer Option.DOC
<<Titan-Schaeffer Option.DOC>>
Kathleen and Kay:
Per Kathleen's voicemail this morning, attached hereto please find the most
recent version of the Titan-Schaffer Option Agreement for your use. Please
feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you may have on this
matter.
Best regards,
Karen
Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email: [email protected]
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347
____________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.
For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________
- Titan-Schaeffer Option.DOC | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Margaret,
Please find attached Texas and Louisiana wellhead prices (daily, monthly and
quarterly). We had data available starting 1983 and the information source is
Natural Gas Intelligence. Information on UK "beach" prices will be available
for the following locations: Teesside, Bacton and St. Fergus. Would you like
to have data on a specific one?
Sincerely,
Elena
Elena Chikina
Enron Research Group
Vince J Kaminski@ECT
08/01/2000 07:52 AM
To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Vince Does your group have a Monthly or a Quarterly price
history in nominal terms
for a US onshore Louisiana natural gas price (or a Texas wellhead price ) and
a UK landed beach price for the past 15 years? I am gathering historical data
for Jim O Hara for our Colombia pipeline in South America and these are among
the series of data they are seeking. They would like the data
from a published source in an electronic file if possible.. Their timetable
is by COB Weds this week. Thank you for your help. Margaret
Mike do you agree with me? Please, ask Elena to check what price info is
available at XMIM.
Vince
Margaret,
The prices going back 15 years are not too informative (for the first 5
years) , as he industry was still regulated.
We shall try to get you the US series as soon as possible.
Vince
Margaret Carson@ENRON
07/31/2000 04:12 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kyran Hanks/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vince Does your group have a Monthly or a Quarterly price history in
nominal terms
for a US onshore Louisiana natural gas price (or a Texas wellhead price ) and
a UK landed beach price for the past 15 years? I am gathering historical data
for Jim O Hara for our Colombia pipeline in South America and these are among
the series of data they are seeking. They would like the data
from a published source in an electronic file if possible.. Their timetable
is by COB Weds this week. Thank you for your help. Margaret | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear Sir's
Vessel Hoegh Galleon/C6QB8
ETA Qalhat now 13th. May 0900 local time,
Brgds Oe. Hansen
Master
E-mail: [email protected]
Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no.+874 330853910
Fax : Inmarsat fax no.+874 330853913
Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.+584 330853915
Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.+584 430853910 (24hrs.watch) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I have a problem, I just accepted a new position at my work. The hours are
really fucked up and are kind of like fireman hours where I have to work some
night shifts and weekends but get several days of in a row afterward. I
won't find out my schedule for the month until next week so there is a
possibility that I may not be able to go if i am scheduled to work that
weekend. I realize I will get some shit for this but at least I am not using
the OPERA EXCUSE. I will let you guys know as soon as I get my new schedule
but, if I am off on that weekend i am definetly in.
Memo to Jones: You HAVE to come up with some better excuses if you don't
want to get hazed. The Opera! REALLY GUY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?
"Wilson, Matt" <[email protected]> on 10/09/2000 01:12:56 PM
To: "'Marcus Jones'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Elk Hunt
Hey, I told everybody to leave the first two weekends in November open, then
I asked what your preference might be. Hsu was the only one who gave a
preference. Macy's birthday is the first weekend. Why is this the first
time you decided to mention the friggin opera. Give a ticket to Cindy or
whoever and nut up and go bag a bull.
> ----------
> From: Marcus Jones[SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 7:59 AM
> To: Wilson, Matt
> Subject: RE: Elk Hunt
>
> Hey I can't go that weekend!! I can go on the 4th. Julie and I have
> Opera
> tickets for the 11th. Go the 4th!! Why not?
>
> Marcus B. Jones
> MCA Architects, P.C.
> PH (503)226-0622
> FAX (503)226-0626
> 30 NW 1st Ave.
> Portland, OR 97209
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wilson, Matt [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 7:20 AM
> To: '[email protected]'; Marcus Jones; '[email protected]'
> Subject: Elk Hunt
>
>
> November 11th and 12th is the weekend we will plan on going. I'm going to
> leave Eugene on Thursday the 9th at about 4pm and plan to arrive at the
> Starkey camp at around 10pm (45 min. south of La Grande). Can anyone else
> get Friday off? It would be nice to meet at Marcus' place and take one
> vehicle (an Explorer?). If you plan to hunt then you'd better get your
> hunting license and tag (Rocky Mountain Elk, second season) real soon. I
> plan to hunt Friday, Saturday, and Sunday and head for home on Sunday the
> 12th about noon. We should be back in Portland by 5pm. Hope you guys
> don't
> flake out. Papa Wilson bought a nice big canvas tent and wood stove so
> were
> going in style this year. You will need warm clothes. Preferably wool
> because you don't want anything that makes noise, like nylon. Call me if
> you need some options. Also a warm sleeping bag and don't use any scents
> before you come over (shampoos, soaps, deoderants) as the Elk have great
> smell.
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
(1) The term "Threshold Amount" as used in Annex B refers to the threshold
for cross default purposes under Section 5(a)(vi) of the ISDA boilerplate by
reference to outstanding loans ("obligations for the payment of money", i.e.,
"Specified Indebtedness" in Section 14 of the ISDA boilerplate). Credit sets
the threshold level and we input that number into the document.
(2) Susan Bailey will send you the ISDA Master Agreement boilerplate. Her
number is X34737.
SUSAN: Please send Davis the ISDA boilerplate (no CSA). Thanks. Sara
Enron North America Corp.
From: Davis Thames 04/03/2000 09:53 AM
To: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EMP Echo LLC
Laurel,
As we discussed on the phone, the floating rate day count convention should
be Actual/360.
Sara, could you easily explain what the Threshold Amount means in Annex B? I
tried to look it up on the web but couldn't find anything. Additionally, if
you have an extra copy of ISDA up there, I might like to have a copy (hope
you don't hurt yourself laughing...).
Thanks & regards,
Davis
Laurel Adams
03/31/2000 12:54 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Davis Thames/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EMP Echo LLC
Please find attached a draft of the confirmation for the interest rate
swap. Please review and let me know what changes may need to be made. Sara,
please pay speical attention to the Fixed and Floating rate payer payment
dates, and the floating rate option language. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I forwarding the following from eVelocity.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 10:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Shareholder Update
Please forward the following letter to Rod Canion and Ken Lay as I do
not have contact information for either of them. ?Thanks for your
help.
Sue Downey
eVelocity Corporation
(603) 766-5012
[email protected]
(See attached file: May Letter -evelocity.doc)
- May Letter -evelocity.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jonathan Lakritz just called to change the Wood all-party to 11 a.m.
tomorrow. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Cassandra S Dutton/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000
01:41 PM ---------------------------
From: Julissa Marron @ ENRON 08/22/2000 10:27 AM
To: Patrick Marron <[email protected]>, Angela
Mendez/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Tiffany La Dang <[email protected]>,
"Arthur Campos" <[email protected]>, Macra Cano
<[email protected]>, [email protected], "Becky Beltran"
<[email protected]>, Marilyn Rivera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber
Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Weldon/Corp/Enron@Enron, "Linda Stevens"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], Betty Garcia
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Absolutely Beautiful!
This has sound. It is absolutely beautiful!!! Enjoy!!
- Beautiful.exe | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached below is the most recent version of the Enron Global Markets
presentation. This presentation provides a good and consistent way to
describe the EGM business.
Please forward any updates and changes directly to Mike McConnell as the
information becomes available. Thank you. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The security desk downstairs may know who he checked in to see. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Who sings that piece of shit??
Loverboy?
Duran Duran?
I can't remember!!1 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI, I do physical gas agreements therefore, kindly remove my name for
the ISDA distribution.
Thanks!
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Ms. Halligan,
Mr. Mark Baldwin with Interstate Gas Services will be representing
Transwestern Pipeline Company during Tuesday's hearing. Transwestern is a
party of record in this proceeding. Mr. Baldwin is Transwestern's California
consultant, and is well versed in state regulatory matters and, in
particular, this docket. On behalf of Transwestern, Mr. Baldwin will address
the following issues:
1. The PD in light of recent events in both the natural gas and electricity
markets in California.
2 A comparison of certain features of the PD and the alternative settlement
(Comprehensive Settlement) supported by SoCalGas Company and the majority of
the stakeholders, including Transwestern Pipeline.
3. The relationship between the CPUC's decision in this proceeding and the
ongoing investigation of the sufficiency of infrastructure for both natural
gas and electricity.
My understanding is that the CPUC prefers the speakers be brief. With your
permission, Mr. Baldwin's remarks will be limited to no more than 5 minutes,
with an opportunity for questions to follow.
Please let me know if there are any other guidelines the CPUC would like
parties to follow in this proceeding. Also, please let me know if there are
any questions that I can answer for you.
Jeffery C. Fawcett
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-853-1521
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 01:49 PM -----
"SCIENTECH IssueAlert" <[email protected]>
02/28/2001 06:07 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: Constellation to Build Major Plant in California, First in Over a
Decade
Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:
Get over 100-pages of daily tracked and verified e-commerce utility-related
information with SCIENTECH's E-Commerce InfoGrid. This unique Strategic and
Competitive Intelligence tool will help you stay on top of the torrent of
e-commerce information news and analysis. Don't miss this opportunity to find
out what's happening in the field of utility e-commerce. Download a free
sample and order your InfoGrid today at www.ConsultRCI.com or contact Chris
Vigil at 505-244-7605.
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH. The Wall Map measures 42" x
72"; the Executive Map Set consists of 18 11" x 17" maps. Visit our website
at www.ConsultRCI.com for a detailed description of these valuable maps and
complete ordering instructions.
For advertising information, email Nancy Spring, or call (505)244-7613.
[IMAGE]
IssueAlert for February 28, 2001
Constellation to Build Major Plant in California,
First in Over a Decade
by Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
Constellation Energy Group (NYSE: CEG) announced that Kiewit Industrial
Company of Omaha, Neb., will begin construction in early April of the 750-MW
High Desert power plant near Victorville, Calif. The project, which has been
in development since the mid-1990s by High Desert Power Project, LLC*a
subsidiary of Constellation Energy Group of Baltimore, Md.*will be the first
new major power plant to serve the Southern California area in more than a
decade.
Analysis: The fact that California suffers from a significant supply / demand
imbalance, and that no new major power plant has been built in the state in
over a decade, has been well documented in the energy industry press.
Consequently, the fact that Constellation Energy Group is now close to
breaking ground on its new plant (having completed the laborious plant siting
requirements in California) is a major*and somewhat surprising*coup for the
company, considering that its generation expertise has primarily been in the
Northeast nuclear industry. Constellation Energy Group has said that it will
market power from the plant within California, which should prove to be a win
/ win scenario for both the company and the state.
The High Desert power plant will be built on a 25-acre site at the Southern
California Logistics Airport, formerly known as the George Air Force Base.
Commercial operation of the plant is scheduled for June 2003. The plant's
electric generating technology is based on clean-burning, natural gas-fired
combustion turbines operating in a combined-cycle mode. Part of the current
supply problem in California is the fact that hydroelectric resources, the
state's primary energy source, have been in short supply due to
lower-than-average rainfall over the last year. Moving away from a dependency
on hydroelectric supply may be a smart move for the state. In addition, the
High Desert plant is consistent with a national trend that supports natural
gas as the fuel of choice for new power plant development projects. As a
point of interest, according to data from the Energy Information
Administration, California's fuel mix is primarily based in a mixture of
natural gas (45.59 percent), hydro (21.95 percent), nuclear (18.07 percent),
coal (1.36 percent), oil (1.04 percent), and other, presumably renewable,
sources (11.98 percent).
It is rather surprising that Constellation would be the first company to
build a major power plant in California in over a decade, considering the
company's consistent geographic and fuel-mix focus. Constellation Energy
Group is a holding company that includes a group of competitive energy
businesses focused mostly on wholesale power marketing, merchant generation
and portfolio management in North America. Constellation Energy Group is the
parent company of the Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE), a regulated
gas and electric delivery company serving Central Maryland. Up until this
point, Constellation's generation assets have been primarily based in a
mixture of coal and nuclear, and for the most part located in the
Northeastern United States. According to information directly from the
company itself, Constellation's own fuel mix is predominantly coal (54
percent), followed by nuclear (40 percent). Oil, gas and hydro only represent
a small percentage (6 percent) of Constellation's fuel mix.
Although coal is the primary fuel in Constellation's portfolio, over the last
year the company has become more focused on nuclear. For instance, last
December Constellation Nuclear, a wholly owned subsidiary of Constellation
Energy Group, announced its intent to purchase 100 percent of Unit 1 and 82
percent of Unit 2 of the Nine Mile Point nuclear power plant. Once the deal
is closed in mid-2001, Constellation will own a total of 1,550 MW of Nine
Mile Point's 1,757 MW of total generating capacity. The nuclear plant
purchases that Constellation is making expand upon its Calvert Cliffs asset,
an 850-MW two-unit nuclear plant in Southern Maryland. When I wrote about
this acquisition last December, I noted that, while Constellation will most
likely retain its coal-fired generation assets, the company appeared to be
moving closer toward a nuclear-based portfolio.
In addition, in early 2000 Constellation began a restructuring of its
corporate identity, dividing its operations into two separate segments: one
focused on its merchant energy business (including Constellation Nuclear) and
the other focused on regional retail energy services. The merchant energy
business was ranked fifth in the nation for sales of electric power in the
third quarter of 2000, and the company is committed to expanding this growth.
The goal for the merchant energy business, according to Constellation Energy
Group CEO Christian Poindexter, is to establish a portfolio of over 30,000 MW
of electric generation facilities by 2005. Toward that end, Constellation
acknowledged earlier that it would be taking advantage of "bargain prices for
nuclear plants," which resulted in large part from other utilities focusing
on transmission operations and thus choosing, or being mandated, to divest
their generation plants. Constellation in the past has justified its move in
this direction by saying that its experience has found that nuclear fuel is
cheaper than coal and gas generators and that "the economics [of nuclear] are
quite robust, once they are calculated out."
However, considering that there is only a limited number of nuclear plants in
the United States that will become available for purchase, Constellation
Energy Group may have recognized the need to become even more diversified.
The California market, despite its stringent plant siting requirements,
arguably offered an appropriate market for Constellation to become more
diversified. Given the state's environmental lobbying presence, it is
doubtful that a nuclear plant could have been approved in California.
Although natural gas is not a primary fuel source for Constellation as a
company, it is the preferred source for new power plants. Therefore, the High
Desert plant, given that it will be fired by natural gas, presumably stood a
greater chance of navigating through California's plant siting requirements
(than a coal or nuclear plant could have). In fact, in the announcement of
the plant, Constellation noted that, having received all federal, state and
local approvals, the High Desert plant "will be a good neighbor in the
community with no significant environmental impacts."
The announcement of Constellation's new plant could not come at a better time
for California, of course. Although the plant won't be operational until June
2003, the state can use the good publicity now. A new report from the
Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) says that it is already too late
for the state to head off a serious summer shortage that could lead to at
least 20 hours of rolling blackouts. "It's too late for this summer,"
declared Lawrence J. Makovich, of CERA, referring to the state's desperate
efforts to ramp up power supplies for the short term. "The source of
California's far-reaching power crisis is a shortage. At least 5,000
megawatts of new generating facilities are required to restore balance to the
state's grid." Instead, according to the report, demand will exceed supply by
3,000 MW, which will cause the state to be under an energy alert of some sort
for at least 200 hours.
CERA's report came out on the heels of Calif. Gov. Gray Davis' pledge to have
5,000 MW of new generating capacity available in California by July, more
than double the amount expected just a few months ago. Davis said the new
plants would provide enough electricity to ward off blackouts this summer,
which CERA obviously disputes. Davis announced a series of orders intended to
bring online 5,000 MW by July 2001, with an additional 5,000 MW by July
2002.
In any event, as California continues to struggle from a severe supply /
demand imbalance, the announcement of Constellation's new plant appears to be
good news for all the parties involved. Gov. Davis has pledged to support an
expedited approval process for additional plants, so it will be interesting
to see which company is given approval to proceed with the next power plant
in the state. It will also be interesting to see, based on Constellation's
plant and others that may be built, whether or not the economics of building
such plants in California will prove beneficial. Other power suppliers may
opt to merely enter into long-term sales agreements with the state, rather
than invest the resources that building a power plant would require.
An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.ConsultRCI.com
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.
If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on energy issues.
Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights reserved. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I owe you big time.
Send me a bill.
"Germany, Mary/COR" <[email protected]> on 07/25/2000 01:49:49 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: State Slogans
You owe me.
Mary Germany, Manager
Accounts Payable
Payroll
Accounting Support
(303) 713-2151
fax (303) 846-2151
email - [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Karlis [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: July 25, 2000 11:54 AM
To: Germany, Mary/COR
Subject: Re: State Slogans
Mine is a Kodak DC210 Plus. I'm sure there is a newer version out now.
This one is a little over a year old.
rich
----- Original Message -----
From: Germany, Mary/COR <[email protected]>
To: 'Richard Karlis' <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: State Slogans
> Hey Bob,
>
> What type of digital camera do you have? I have a friend who is looking
at
> buying one and they like the quality of the pictures yours takes.
>
> See ya!
>
> Mary Germany, Manager
> Accounts Payable
> Payroll
> Accounting Support
> (303) 713-2151
> fax (303) 846-2151
> email - [email protected]
>
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I just spoke to Brent and he still cannot get into the website. Can you get
with TradeSpark and figure out what the problem is and how can we get our
people access. Thanks. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Susan,
For this Termination and Payment. Can you please use the attached and adjust
it accordingly (Sept. payment delay)?
Thanks,
Joe
---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000
04:49 PM ---------------------------
Brant Reves
09/13/2000 08:14 AM
To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Trade NY9319
I believe I forgot to include the name of this customer, which is Central
Resources, Inc.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brant Reves/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000 08:13
AM ---------------------------
Brant Reves
09/12/2000 06:39 PM
To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Trade NY9319
Everyone,
The current value of existing fmtm is ($3.2MM). Fred and this customer have
had a falling out and the customer has decided to unwind his position and
take his business elsewhere. Because of this, an opposite trade was entered
into that exactly reciprocated like terms. This trade has not yet been
confirmed and is currently pending credit. As a cost of agreeing to do this,
the customer was to provide $5.25/bbl on the remaining 92,000 barrels. This
amount totals $483,000 which, in the normal course of doing business, is owed
and due as of tommorrow, September 13. Fred and his customer, while I was
listening on a taped line, agreed to structure settlement of trade NY9319 as
such:
Amounts to be paid;
$483,000 Premium Payment Owed and Due
$192,375 Amount ENA owes this customer for Sept financial settlement - being
withheld and netted against the $483M
$290,625 net amount to be financed until final payment is made on September
30.
$1,353 amount of interest on the principal, using interest rate of 10%, 17
days of tenor
$291,978 exact amount to be paid on September 30
Please structure the above referenced terms into appropriate language for the
confirmation of trade NY9319 and provide such language to the confirmation
desk.
Original deal done March 3, 2000: NB4261
ENA Long Call 28.30 1,000/bbls/d Oct-Dec'00
ENA Short Put 22.50 1,000/bbls/d Oct-Dec'00
ENA Long Put 18.50 1,000/bbls/d Oct-Dec'00
New deal done September 11, 2000: NY9319
Customer Long Call 28.30 1,000/bbls/d Oct-Dec'00
Customer Short Put 22.50 1,000/bbls/d Oct-Dec'00
Customer Long Put 18.50 1,000/bbls/d Oct-Dec'00
Let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Thanks
Brant | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Me. I will review the attached.
Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
04/10/2001 04:52 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Guaranty
Dan, I had originally intended to send this to Clement but I was directed to
you instead. For incoming guaranty issues, do I contact you or Clement?
Thanks.
Walter
-----Original Message-----
From: Hyvl, Dan
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Guidroz, Walter
Subject: Re: FW: Guaranty
Walter,
where you intending to send this to me or to Clement Abrams?
Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate 04/10/2001 04:02 PM To: Dan J
Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: FW: Guaranty
Clement, attached is a guaranty draft from Enterprise Products Operating, LP
who is providing a guaranty to cover two new potential EOL counterparties,
Pontchartrain Natural Gas System and Calcasieu Gas Gathering System. Please
review them and let me know if there are any comments or questions. The one
comment I'll make is that we are unsure of our comfort with the dollar amount
that they propose, but everything else is probably OK. I can be reached at
5-3595. Thanks for your help.
Walter
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Theis <[email protected]>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Ken+20Theis+20+3CKTheis+40eprod+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:04 PM
To: Guidroz, Walter
Subject: Guaranty
Attached is the Guaranty we discussed earlier. Let me know if you have any
questions. Ken Theis
<<epolp guaranty.doc>>
- epolp guaranty.doc << File: epolp guaranty.doc >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Needs to be vetted with Herman at some point. If Jake wants to negotiate
something else with GE, I'm all for it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:12
PM ---------------------------
Jake Thomas@ECT
03/16/2001 01:01 PM
To: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ENA/Hanover Compressor Company: Letter Agreement and LLC
Agreemen t
Has anyone given any more thought to the need for this structure with Hanover
?
From: Carlos Sole@ENRON on 03/16/2001 01:05 PM CST
To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENA/Hanover Compressor Company: Letter Agreement and LLC Agreemen t
Attached are the form of Letter Agreement and LLC Agreement redacted for
Hanover for you all to forward. As for the turbine contract, Stephen you
have a copy of that but may want to delete E-Next's name and anything else. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Peter Streicher
813 Tompkins Drive
Madison, WI 53716
[email protected]
To Mr. Ken Lay,
I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills. Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.
Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out. And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year. As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.
The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it. Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.
Sincerely,
Peter Streicher | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Much Calif Power Price Gouging Beyond FERC's Reach -ISO
Updated: Monday, June 25, 2001 06:59 PM ET Email this article to a friend!
Printer-friendly version
By Jason Leopold
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Federal energy regulators only have the authority to
order refunds for about a third of the $9 billion California Gov. Gray Davis
claims energy companies have overcharged the state in the 12 months to May
2001, documents from the state's wholesale market operator show.
Of the total, $2.9 billion came from the May-September period the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission has said it can't act on, and $2.8 billion from
the October-May period is attributable to municipal utilities over which FERC
lacks jurisdiction, according to documents from the California Independent
System Operator.
That leaves just $3.3 billion in alleged overcharges that FERC could
potentially order refunded - far less than the $9 billion Davis seeks.
Talks between generators and state officials to settle billions of dollars in
unpaid bills and issues of overcharging began Monday. Curtis Wagner, the FERC
administrative law judge presiding over the talks, has said California will
likely see refunds from generators, but far less than the $9 billion Davis
expects.
Davis said Sunday California is going to Washington, D.C., "with one goal,
and that is to bring back $9 billion."
Nearly half that amount is attributable to municipal utilities, the ISO
documents show. The ISO said the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power,
for example, overcharged California $75 million between May and October.
David Freeman, the governor's chief energy adviser and the former general
manager of the LADWP, said the agency didn't overcharge the state, but
conceded it profited by selling spare power to the ISO.
Davis adviser Nancy McFadden said the state needs FERC to lay the groundwork
for the state to seek refunds from public utilities by ordering refunds from
corporate energy suppliers.
But during a conference call Sunday with reporters, McFadden and Davis press
secretary Steve Maviglio couldn't explain how the governor would go about
getting refunds from companies whose wholesale power prices aren't regulated
by FERC.
Davis testified before the U.S. Congress last week that generators
overcharged the state $9 billion and that FERC should order the refunds.
State Sen. Jim Brulte, R-Rancho Cucamonga, has asked for an investigation
into Davis's testimony, saying the figures were based on "shaky
calculations."
To come up with its conclusions, the ISO compared hourly market prices
received by sellers to an estimate of market prices that could have been
expected under competitive market conditions.
The ISO established a benchmark for what it determined was competitive - at
times about $125 per megawatt-hour to $200/MWh, a fraction of actual prices
in the market - based on the cost of natural gas and compliance with
air-quality rules.
The ISO, however, typically used the price of gas at California's northern
border, according to the documents. Generators paid a higher price for the
fuel in Southern California, raising the cost of making electricity.
The ISO also used reports of earnings by the state's "Big Five" power
suppliers during 2000 - earnings that for some quadrupled - to draw the
conclusion that generators overcharged the state, according to the documents.
The ISO attributed high power prices in part to the state's three largest
utilities' failure to buy the power they needed in advance, leaving the grid
operator to pick up the shortfall at the last minute, according to the
documents.
The ISO alleges the following companies overcharged the state by the listed
amounts between May 2000 and February: | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please Review and let's discuss next steps. I would like to have the physical guys you met recently give this the smell test. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Enron North America Corp.
From: Katherine Brown @ ENRON 12/13/99 03:19 PM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James V Derrick@Enron,
Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Fowler@ENRON, Mark Frevert/LON/ECT@ECT,
Kevin P Hannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Harrison@ENRON, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Hirko/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kurt S
Huneke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rebecca P
Mark/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, J
Mark Metts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES,
Kenneth D Rice/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
E White/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda
Garza-Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marcia
Manarin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacy Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly
Bobrow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rosane
Fabozzi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelby
Earle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelby Earle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Trosper@ENRON,
Nicki Daw/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol Ann Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolly Henrici@ENRON, Ann
Joyner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy Young/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ann Joyner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Stark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sherryl Stone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marsha
Lindsey/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy B Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri
Reinartz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G
Smith@EES, Bobbie Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joe Witherspoon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rodney Keys/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Candi
Woods/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vanessa
Groscrand/Corp/Enron@Enron, Suzanne Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETINGS - Monday, December 20
There will not be an Executive Committee Breakfast on Monday, December 20.
However, we will hold a weekly meeting on that date. Details are below.
Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date: Monday, December 20
Time: 11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video: Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: A conference call bridge has been reserved. The dial in number
713/853-3233.
Please contact Sherri Sera (713/853-5984) or Katherine Brown (713/345-7774)
for the weekly passcode.
Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.
Yes, I will attend in person ___X____
By video conference from _______
By conference call _______ (contact Sherri or Katherine for weekly
passcode)
No, I will not attend _______
***
Please return this e-mail to me with your responses by 12:00p, Friday,
December 17.
Thank you,
Katherine | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
PROCESSING
27821 Cinergy 2/1-2/28/02 5,000/d Cen Pool to Topock Need CAF
TENDERED
24198 Richardson Eff 1/23/02 35,714/d Add Blk #16 Tendered 1/22
25374 Oneok Ext to 2/28/02 12,500/d Panhdle to Beaver EXECUTED
26758 Duke Eff 1/30/02 40,000/d Swap RP Vol EXECUTED
27377 Agave Ext to 3/31/02 10,000/d Pecos to W. Ward Tendered 1/24
27420 WTG Eff 2/02 Only 2,700/d Panhdle to Winkler Tendered 1/29
27803 BP 1/1/03-12/31/04 25,000/d Blmfld to Needles Tendered 1/28
27813 Sempra 2/1/02-2/28/02 15,000/d Blmfld to Topock EXECUTED
27819 PG&E 2/1/02-10/31/02 20,000/d Blmfld to Calif Tendered 1/29 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The following expense report is ready for approval:
Employee Name: Jane M. Tholt
Status last changed by: Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: November 21, 2001
Report Total: $67.00
Amount Due Employee: $67.00
To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mark:
Attached please find the latest version of the Long Description for the new
Nuclear Outage Knock-In Call Option. Let me know if you have any
thoughts/comments.
Leslie | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi:
Hope you're well. Based on your note, I faxed my Direct Deposit change to
Renee Kelso a week or so ago and wanted to check with her to see that she'd
received it and that it was in process, but I can't find her name in email.
Any suggestions on how I can check in and see how progress is going? As
always, thanks a bunch.
Best,
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
does it take awhile for my access to NACAL-SQWS001D to take effect?
-----Original Message-----
From: Rondeau, Clayton
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:55 PM
To: Richey, Cooper
Subject: | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
What are we going to do, Brief. I can only say that will probably hit the
City sometime during the upcoming holidays. I will promise to give you some
warning so that we can get together, and maybe I'll even stay more than a day
this time...
Anyway, I hope your Thanksgiving was nice, although it sounds like your work
responsibilities are indifferent to holidays. I had a nice time at home and
I saw Rent while I was in the City Sunday. I give you a call soon.
Mat | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi there,
Does anyone have a Finance/Accounting blessed professional services agreement?
Thanks,
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The TradersNews hourly, daily and term indexes, along with our industry
coverage, is available at www.tradersnewsenergy.com.
?
Bobette Riner??????????????????????????????? Senior Power Markets
Analyst?????? TradersNews Energy713/647-8690FAX: 713/647-7552cell:
832/[email protected]://www.tradersnewsenergy.com
?
?
- DlyMrkt 021401.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/18/2000 03:14
PM ---------------------------
Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/17/2000 09:27 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Martin W Penkwitz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Vitro/Termination agreement
What I was told by your secretary and Marty was that ENA was keeping one of
the signed originals, and I picked up the other to give to Schroeder. I do
not exactly know where ENA's original went. Lets ask Marty.
To: Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: Vitro/Termination agreement
I thought that someone retrieved the originals (which has been signed by GE
but not Enron) while I was in Ft. Worth for my dad's surgery. Marty mentioned
that you were looking for them, so I thought he had given them to you (he's
out this week). I have not seen the termination agreement since I returned.
Did you and John leave fully executed termination agreements in my office?
Maybe someone else picked them up.
I can't tell you what's going on with the assignment. Perhaps Peggy Banczak
can help out with that.
Kay
Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/17/2000 08:00 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Vitro/Termination agreement
Schroeder and I left two signed originals with you, so what does "processed"
mean. Yes, thankyou for asking, GE has received their fully executed
original, and therefore should be prepared to issue the invoice to
Purchaser. But I have not seen the invoice yet.
What is the status of the assignment of the GE contract to Mitsui? Did the
invoice go to them?
To: Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vitro/Termination agreement
I haven't seen a signed copy of the termination agreement cross my desk. I
just want to make sure that the fully executed document has been processed.
Thanks,
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Kathryn (EES Volume Management) and I are trying to determine what the Dominion Pipeline imbalances are from the Appalachian producers for EES. Dominion will not tell us without making a formal request to their legal department. We may have to do that anyway. I'm not sure what this report is called, I just know its on a 2 month lag. I'm also not sure if this report was mailed to us or if we could run it out of Escript (Dominion's EBB). If it was run out of Escript, then someone in volume management should know how to do it and that person could show me. If the report was mailed to us, then I'll have to make a formal request to Dominion's legal department.
Don't spend more than 10 minutes trying to figure out how to do this. If the person that handled Dominion is gone, then I'll just go the "legal" route.
Thanks | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Raquel -
Thanks for the message. I will get the letter and Password App. out to you
tomorrow. As to the ETA, the reason we do a side letter on the changes is
because every user of EnronOnline is required to "click" on the on-line ETA
prior to using the system. Accordingly, the process is really this -
- PGW completes the PA and submits it to EnronOnline
- Presuming approval of the PA, EnronOnline issues the appropriate password
and user id to PGW
- PGW signs onto the system using the password and user id
- After being asked to change the password, the on-line ETA appears and PGW
must "click" to accept in order to use the system
Since the ETA is not agreed to until access is first obtained to the system,
if you want to wait to sign the amendment letter, that is fine. Either way,
I will have them forwarded.
Please let me know if you should need anything further.
Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone: 713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail: [email protected]
Raquel Guzman <[email protected]>
04/26/2001 10:47 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: Ben Moroz <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: FW: Letter Agreement re EnronOnline ETA
Thanks Mark. They look OK. I think Enron needs to send them to us, because
the sideletter to the Electronic Trading Agreement ("ETA") needs to be on
Enron letterhead (see attached). If it is acceptable to you, please send
the Password App, ETA, and Side Letter to my attention at:
Raquel N. Guzman
Philadelphia Gas Works
Legal Department
Philadelphia, PA 19122
Thanks for your help on this one.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:33 AM
To: Raquel Guzman
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: Letter Agreement re EnronOnline ETA
Raquel -
The attached two documents are the ones in Leslie's file for this matter.
If these are acceptable to PG, please let me know and have hard copies
forwarded.
(See attached file: Philadelphia Gas Works.doc) (See attached file:
Philadelphia Gas Password.doc)
Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone: 713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail: [email protected]
Raquel Guzman
<Raquel.Guzman@pg To:
"'[email protected]'"
works.com> <[email protected]>
cc:
04/25/2001 04:07 Subject: FW: Letter
Agreement re EnronOnline
PM ETA
Mark: Thanks for looking into this. I will pass on the good news to my
folks.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 11:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Letter Agreement re EnronOnline ETA
Raquel:
Please see my proposed revisions to the Password App. Let me know if this
addresses your concerns. If so, please provide me with the full name of PG
Works, as well as the mailing address and recipient for the side letter so
that I can finalize.
Regards,
Leslie
(See attached file: Philadelphia Gas Password.doc)
Raquel Guzman
<Raquel.Guzman@pg To:
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
works.com> cc:
Subject: RE: Letter
Agreement re EnronOnline ETA
09/14/2000 09:16
AM
Leslie: Thanks. My only comment is that your suggested language should
also apply to Condition (2), second paragraph, of the "Enron Online
Password
Application." Please let me know if you concur. Thanks.
----------
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 2:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Letter Agreement re EnronOnline ETA
Raquel:
Attached please find the letter agreement amending Section 4(b) of
the
EnronOnline Electronic Trading Agreement as per our discussion.
Please let
me know if you have any questions or comments.
Regards,
Leslie Hansen
(713) 853-6121
(See attached file: Philadelphia Gas Works.doc)<<File: Philadelphia
Gas Works.doc>>
(See attached file: Philadelphia Gas Password.doc) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 5:38 PM
To: Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Curry, Ken
Subject: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 10-11-01
Please see attached.
Regards,
Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000 06:14 PM -----
Peter Keohane
Sent by: Sharon Crawford
09/15/2000 05:39 PM
To: Soma Ghosh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clement
Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Andre
Templeman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Alberta PPA Financing
I thought I might try to sum up. It seems to me that we both need to
finalize the structure as well as co-ordinate across various groups such that
we all know what each is doing with the view to funding on time by the end of
next week.
1. As soon as possible next week (i.e. Monday) we need to finalize the swap
structure including the credit and covenant package.
2. If there is not already a Term Sheet in place, it may be useful to have
one prepared. Frankly, it seems from my various discussions with Global
Finance, Credit, Origination, Enron Corp., Royal Bank of Canada and its
external counsel and our external counsel, that there are certain agreements,
documents, deliverables and covenants that are being expected by, or
exchanged between, the parties, but which are not being communicated among
each other and we are therefore working at cross purposes. Frankly, unless
and until we know what the structure is to look like, what the credit and
financial covenants are to look like, and what the documentation expectations
are, it is difficult if not impossible to prepare documentation. For
example:
(a) I had a confusing conversation with the Bank as to the form of Guarantee
they were expecting from Enron Corp. I was trying to require the Bank to
accept an Enron Corp. standard form Guarantee, whereas the Bank was looking
for a long form Guarantee that includes the covenants, representations and
warranties of Enron Corp. in its revolving credit facilities. Based upon
this disagreement, I left a message for Clement to the effect that we may
have a problem to resolve. However, Clement was kind enough to advise me by
voice mail that in fact Enron Corp. does not have a problem with giving a
long form Guarantee of this nature and that the form of Guarantee had in fact
been provided (by whom I'm not sure) to the Bank.
(b) The Bank was enquiring as to what would be the governing law of the
Enron Corp. Guarantee, to which I advised it would be Texas law. However, I
now understand there may be some agreement (by whom I'm not sure) to have the
Enron Corp. Guarantee governed by New York law.
(c) In any event, I understand that the Bank will be looking for a form of
enforceability opinion from Enron Corp.'s outside legal counsel with respect
to the authorization, execution, delivery and enforceability of the Enron
Corp. Guarantee, as well as certain conflicts of laws opinions with respect
to the governing law of the Guarantee (Texas/New York) being enforceable.
(d) In my discussions with the Bank this afternoon, it also became aware to
me that the Bank is expecting external counsel legal opinions with respect to
Enron Canada. Blake, Cassels & Graydon is prepared to provide those legal
opinions.
(e) As noted above, I have discussed with the Bank that the governing law of
the underlying swap documents would be Alberta, to which they seemed fine. I
suggested that Ontario law would also be acceptable.
(f) I assume that Enron Canada ought to obtain legal opinions from the
Bank's external counsel with respect to the documents and obligations of
Swapco (and perhaps even the Bank), but I will need to have this confirmed.
(g) It came to my attention during my conversations with the Bank this
afternoon that Swapco (or financing SPV) is unaffiliated to the Bank. This
presents problems as, I understand for accounting purposes, the two swaps
involving Enron Canada cannot be linked, for example by cross-defaults. At
the same time unaffiliated exposures under de-linked transactions may not be
capable of being set-off. We undertook to attempt to remedy this situation
through broadening the set-off concepts under the ISDA Master Agreements.
(h) I do not think the Bank frankly (nor anyone else) has a firm grasp on
the credit/collateralization/margin requirements, which I think is dependent
upon a final understanding of the swap structure.
(i) From my discussions with the Bank, it seemed to me that they were not
clear as to how their fees and costs would be repaid through the swap
structure. Although it might be as simple as adding these amounts to the
principal amount of the swaps, I suggested that the Bank prepare a separate
"fee letter" to recover its fees. More problematically, the Bank was not
clear as to how "increased costs" would be accounted for in the swap
structure. Generally speaking, a Bank credit agreement contains provisions
that if there are increased costs of funding to the Bank as a result of a
change in Bank regulations or lending or reserve requirements, those
increased costs are flowed through. They were not sure how this could be
accommodated in a swap structure. I suggested that there may be some way to
fix this through a price adjustment mechanism in the fixed price or volumes
or through a separate indemnification in the "fee letter".
(j) The Bank is anxious to see paper, and I am not sure who is preparing the
paper and consolidating it in a distribution package to the Bank. For
example, I think a package that includes all of the swap Master Agreements
and related documentation (which I believe Mark T's group will prepare in
Houston), the Enron Corp. Guarantee (which I've indicated above seems to have
already been provided in draft to the Bank) and all other documentation needs
to be sent to the Bank as soon as possible, as well as to Blake, Cassels &
Graydon and Vinson and Elkins if they are to be giving legal opinions to the
Bank in connection with the transaction. Of course this depends on
finalization of the structure as well as the credit and other covenants
package. In concept, I have told the Bank, and I believe the Bank agrees,
that the form of the ISDA Master and related documentation would be the same
as the form of ISDA Master which currently exists between ENA and Royal Bank
of Canada, and the Bank asked that they at least be provided with that paper
as soon as possible. Perhaps Tana could look after delivering that as soon
as possible, if not this afternoon, Monday morning.
Frankly, I think this project, if it is to get funded on time, needs a
measure of co-ordination and communication of internal and external
expectations. It may be worthwhile to convene a conference call with all
relevant groups (i.e. Legal/Global Finance/Credit/Origination) on Monday
morning.
Regards,
Peter | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>
RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax
- CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
All testing was performed, and was successful except for the following:
although ENW Resolution Center confirmed that Exchange servers are up, they have received reports that some people get a login screen when trying to access their Outlook. They are instructing their users to cancel by the message. We have not observed this problem in ETS.
while attempting to access the Flow Gas application, we were unable to hit www.infosource.com. We paged the Business Objects on-call pager and will continue to follow up. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades [IMAGE] DownGrades [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated [IMAGE] Stock Splits [IMAGE] Buybacks [IMAGE] Dividends [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce [IMAGE] Pos Surprises [IMAGE] Neg Surprises [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Unsubscribe [IMAGE] Update my Membership / Profile [IMAGE] Forgot Username / Password [IMAGE] Add / Edit Alerts [IMAGE] View My Alerts [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] As requested, your News Alert for AMCC follows from EquityAlert.com. AMCC's 10 Gbps Network Processor to Complete Industry's First Scalable, Software-Compatible 100 Mbps to 10 Gbps NPU Family Fourth-Generation nP7510 Network Processor Joins AMCC's nPX5700 and nPX5800 to Complete 10 Gbps Network Processor, Traffic Manager, and Switch Fabric Platform SAN JOSE, Calif., Oct 22, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Applied Micro Circuits Corp.'s Switching and Network Processing Group (AMCC) (Nasdaq:AMCC) today announced the nP7510 10 Gbps Network Processor, which is expected to complete the industry's first software-compatible network processor (NPU) family that scales from 100 Mbps to 10 Gbps, from Fast Ethernet and OC-3 to 10 Gbps Ethernet and OC-192 Packet over SONET (PoS) and ATM applications. The nP7510 represents the fourth generation in the company's nP7000 family of fully software-programmable, policy-enabled network processors, and with the nPsoft(TM) Development Environment, customers can easily preserve their investments in software from previous generations. The nP7510 complements AMCC's previously announced 10 Gbps traffic managers, framers, PHYs, and switch fabrics to form the industry's first complete integrated solutions for 10 Gbps rate metropolitan area (MAN) edge, access, core router, and other applications. Designed with the company's core, patented Network-optimized Instruction Set Computing (NISC) technology, the nP7510 achieves 10 Gbps rates using just six of AMCC's own highly efficient nPcores(TM) and readily available .18-micron CMOS technology, reserving smaller process geometries for future enhancements and multi-component integration. The maximum efficiency of AMCC's core NPU technology allows for even greater potential future scaling to 40 Gbps OC-768 rates. "AMCC is a market and technology leader in the network processor industry," said Linley Gwennap, principal analyst of The Linley Group. "The nP7510 gives the company a significant lead over its major competitors in delivering a 10 Gbps product. In addition, AMCC's combination of compatible 10 Gbps network processor, traffic manager, framer, PHY, and switch fabric components lets designers reduce time-to-market and risk." The nP7510 represents the fourth-generation of AMCC's nP7000 family of fully software-programmable, policy-enabled network processors and is capable of wire-speed processing at 10 Gbps rates. The network processor offers enhanced debugging capabilities and minimized intrusiveness over previous generations with its On-Chip Debug Engine, allowing programmers increased visibility and flexibility when debugging code. The nP7510 features a new optimized memory interface for the six patented, highly efficient nPcores(TM), enabling new savings in internal memory space. The device also supports a greater number of simultaneous tasks, or threads, than prior network processor generations. The nP7510 is complemented by AMCC's nPsoft(TM) Development Environment, including C/C++ compiler, assembler, performance profiling utilities, graphical symbolic debugger, the nPsoft Services framework and API, and the core nPkernel layer that ensures developers can easily preserve software investments from prior generations. Ready-to-use switching, IP routing, MPLS, and ATM application libraries from AMCC and its software partners provide even greater options for fully integrated turnkey solutions. "Our field-proven, now fourth generation core technology not only lets us produce a wire-speed OC-192 NPU, but enables a complete scalable family, from OC-3 to potential future OC-768 line rates, without a major architectural overhaul," said Andy Gottlieb, vice president of marketing for AMCC's Switching and Network Processing Group. "AMCC's scalable core technology and complementary software architecture make possible new highly scalable complete network equipment systems products with a wide range of interface and uplink speeds, and our existing customers can leverage their prior software investments to further reduce both risk and time-to-market." While the nP7510 can be used in a variety of configurations, including easy combination with other vendors or customers' own silicon, the nP7510 further demonstrates AMCC's leadership in providing complete high-bandwidth silicon solutions for intelligent optical networks by combining seamlessly with AMCC's complete family of 10 Gbps solutions. These include Khatanga, AMCC's recently announced OC-192 framer, the nPX5700 feature-rich traffic management chipset, and AMCC's nPX5800 and nPX8000 families of multi-technology IP/ATM switch fabric solutions that scale from 20 Gbps to terabit ranges. Pricing and Availability The nP7510 is packaged in a 1428-pin Flip Chip BGA and is expected to begin sampling in January. It is priced at $700.00 in volume quantities of 10K. About AMCC AMCC designs, develops, manufactures, and markets high-performance, high-bandwidth silicon solutions empowering intelligent optical networks. AMCC utilizes a combination of high-frequency analog, mixed-signal and digital design expertise coupled with system-level knowledge and multiple silicon process technologies to offer integrated circuit products that enable the transport of voice and data over fiber optic networks. The company's system solution portfolio includes switch fabric, traffic management, network processor, framer/mapper, PHY and PMD devices that address the high-performance needs of the evolving intelligent optical network. AMCC's corporate headquarters and wafer fabrication facilities are located in San Diego. Sales and engineering offices are located throughout the world. Forward Looking Statements The statements contained in this press release that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements, including statements relating to the products discussed in this press release are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the risk that the products would not be successfully or timely, developed or manufactured or achieve market acceptance, risks relating to general economic conditions, as well as the risks and uncertainties set forth in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2001, and in other filings of the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result of these risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date hereof and AMCC does not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statement. Product photos, datasheets and application notes are available upon request. AMCC is a registered trademark of Applied Micro Circuits Corp. nPcore and nPsoft are trademarks of AMCC Switching and Network Processing Corp. Note: A Photo is available at URL: http://www.businesswire.com/cgi-bin/photo.cgi?pw.102201/bb2 CONTACT: Applied Micro Circuits Corp., San Diego Jim Lucas, 408/328-4713 [email protected] or The Ardell Group Sarah Furar, 858/792-2937 [email protected] URL: http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page. Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire. All rights reserved. -0- KEYWORD: CALIFORNIA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS HARDWARE NETWORKING SOFTWARE TELECOMMUNICATIONS PHOTO PHOTOWIRE PHOTO: bb2 SOURCE: Applied Micro Circuits Corp. [IMAGE] ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL*** At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell. In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period. In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement. Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports. Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites. All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer. [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock Quote [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock Chart [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Covered Calls [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Company Profile [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option Details [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Black - Scholes [IMAGE] Sector/Industry Changes Power Option PLUS Logo [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Larry and Joe,
Is there any additional moral pressure that we can put on Westinghouse to get
the resources needed to expedite the resolution of the Gleason 501FD issues
and the vibration issues at Wheatland? The phone call by Larry to GE has
made a world of difference.
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000
08:18 PM ---------------------------
Gavin Gaul@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/17/2000 03:01 PM
To: Mark Dobler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike J
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey@ECT,
Robert P Virgo@ECT, Bill Fox/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dennis
Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Gleason Blade Ring Schedule
Mark,
We have been working diligently with Westinghouse to get a schedule for the
removal and modification of the blade rings at Gleason. I requested
Westinghouse begin to prepare for this work on Sunday after you confirmed
that we could no longer tolerate the operating restriction being added to the
unit. Based on discussions with Westinghouse on Sunday, we estimated that
the work could be completed in 14 days. The site began disassembly of unit
#2 on Monday. Unit #1 disassembly began on Tuesday because we had to wait
for the unit to cool down.
The first verbal schedule from Westinghouse was received Monday night. It
showed the blade rings being machined in series at a single shop and resulted
in the lasy unit being delayed about 4 days. I told Westinghouse this would
not be acceptable and that the blade rings needed to be machined in
parallel. Westinghouse agreed and has made a second shop available. Another
schedule was published yesterday afternoon that required an additional step
in the disassembly that I felt was not required and added a day to the
duration. Westinghouse suggested that we remove the compressor blades from
the rotor before we remove the blade rings. I have since concluded that
removing the rotor blades first is in fact the correct procedure.
As we discussed at the meeting this morning, this schedule for the blade
rings, which has been at the site since last night, will be distributed to
everyone today. In addition, the site will incorporate the remaining startup
activities and issue an integrated schedule tonight.
As we discussed at the meeting this morning, it is very unlikely that Gleason
#1 and #2 can be available by June 1. Our optimistic estimate from the
meeting this morning was June 4-7.
Gavin
To: John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gavin
Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey@ECT, Robert P Virgo@ECT, Bill
Fox/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Gleason Blade Ring Schedule
John/Gavin -
We have made progress over the last week in getting GE attention focused on
the emissions problems at Lincoln. After 6 days of daily conferences on the
subject, GE has arrived in force at Lincoln, with the personnel and resources
required to address the problem. We are not out of the woods yet, but I
believe everything is now being done that can be done to get as many machines
available as possible by June 1.
Enron needs the same focus from Westinghouse, on issues currently plagueing
Wheatland and Gleason. Unlike Lincoln, where the machines are capable of
producing MW's, these two sites have units that cannot operate. Namely,
vibration issues on units 1 and 2 at Wheatland and compressor blade ring
issues on units 1 and 2 at Gleason.
ENA has been requesting since Monday this week, a definitve and complete
schedule from EECC, showing the disassembly, shipping, machining, reassembly
and testing of units 1 and 2 blade rings at Gleason. We still do not have
this schedule. Furthermore, it would appear that after this morning's
meeting, there is some confusion on what work actually needs to be performed
in order to accomplish this task and what impact that may have on the 14-day
schedule committed to ENA by Gavin Gaul on 5/15. I am not sure whether the
communication breakdown is between business units at Westinghouse or between
Enron and Westinghouse, but a schedule and plan is the first step towards
getting the work done and we are two days into the work. I am expecting this
plan to be circulated today.
Lastly, although we have been verbally assured by Westinghouse that there
will be no operating restrictions, other than routine borescope inspections
during off-peak periods, OEC would be more comfortable getting this in
writing. We are requesting a formal notice from Westinghouse, identifying
any operational restrictions (post-blade ring repair) on these units.
If there is any assistance you require, please do not hesitate to request
it. We collectively have 14 days to declare all 15 units ready for
commercial operation.
MSD | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99
03:20 PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 12/17/99 07:51:05 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from rly-yb05.mx.aol.com (rly-yb05.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.5]) by
air-yb03.mail.aol.com (v67.6) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 16:58:45 -0500
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.152.140.66]) by
rly-yb05.mx.aol.com (v67.6) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 16:58:29 -0500
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id VAA25236 for
<[email protected]>; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:58:19 GMT
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (notes.ect.enron.com [172.16.4.33]) by
dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA08866 for
<[email protected]>; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:58:28 -0600 (CST)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 8625684A.0078B2D6 ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:58:21 -0600
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:58:17 -0600
Subject: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=qApCP1JJUTs7ol0zv2e99Xipkn73060WazlSVx5ZP86MdTcyl1LSBdMc"
Content-Disposition: inline
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99 03:58
PM ---------------------------
Anjam Ahmad
12/07/99 09:33 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.
---------------------- Forwarded by Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT on 07/12/99 03:32 PM
---------------------------
(Embedded Enron Europe
image moved
to file: From: John Sherriff
pic31547.pcx) 07/12/99 03:10 PM
Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement
To: ECT Europe, Enron Executive Committee, Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monte L
Gleason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Ruane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rick
L Carson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy
Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant
Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.
(Embedded image moved to file: pic16788.pcx)
We are pleased to announce the formation of the Credit Markets Group which is
responsible for developing innovative products to better manage the risk of
our
internal credit portfolio as well as, looking for opportunities to provide
third party credit protection. Initially, we will be making markets in
bankruptcy protection on reference credits which are currently in our
portfolio
but we expect to add additional credit products and reference credits very
quickly.
The team will utilise EnronOnline as its primary trade execution tool, looking
to quickly build market share by capturing the eyes of our current
counterparts.
Simultaneously, we will launch an external web site focused on credit
protection where potential customers will have access to real time prices and
filter on specific reference credits as well as, access to credit models and
research papers on effective credit risk management. Utilising e-commerce
business principles, we expect to aggressively claim the space for corporate
credit protection. We expect to make a public announcement about these new
products in late January.
In order to effectively access the global market for credit protection, the
group will be based in London with an initial local desk set up in Houston as
well. Bryan Seyfried will be transitioning out of RAC, where he was
responsible
for the Trading Controls and Research teams in Europe, to lead the group and
he
will report to me.
- pic31547.pcx
- pic16788.pcx | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This is a message from The Risk Waters Group
[IMAGE] Complimentary subscription offer Vincent Kaminski [IMAGE] You receive 'email News alerts' from us on a regular basis, and when you joined the list you made us aware that you have an interest in financial technology. So we thought you would be interested in the opportunity to receive Waters magazine - with a complimentary subscription. The financial services industry spends more on technology than any other. Banks and investment banks - whether global or regional - rely on technology to help keep traders ahead of the competition. Each month, Waters defines the challenges that these top global financial services face, profiling the firms who are breaking in new technology as well as the new vendor solutions which could provide the next big leap. This is your opportunity to apply to receive Waters magazine FREE of charge* - all you need to do is click on the link below and complete our short application form. Can you afford to miss IT? To apply will only take a few minutes, and could result in you receiving the information you need free of charge every month - including special reports on topics such as portfolio management, ASPs for the financial services sector and m-commerce, plus regular contributions from industry experts and practitioners and in-depth features dedicated to the major technological developments that are shaping the industry. Apply now in time to receive the November issue! [IMAGE] If you are viewing a text message, please click this link to apply: http://www.watersinfo.com/magazine/details/sample/index2.htm Yours sincerely, Rene? Wijnen Managing Editor, Waters Risk Waters Group Ltd.
* Please note: to qualify for a free subscription all applicants must fulfil qualification crieria preset by our independent audit bureau.
Risk Waters Group
28-29 Haymarket
London, UK
SW1Y 4RX
Tel: 00 44 (0)20 7484 9700
Mailto: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
If you would prefer not to receive further messages from this sender:
1. Click on the Reply button.
2. Replace the Subject field with the word REMOVE.
3. Click the Send button.
You will receive one additional e-mail message confirming your removal. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
some spreads
I sold 1/d Apr02 @ 2.75
i sold .5/d Nov @ 2.5 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is the request to resubmit for 4/19/01
Please contact me at 503-464-8298, as soon as possible.
Jim Reyes | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is the document we've drafted that we wish to send to Steve Tick in
the morning. Please provide your comments or approval to send this out as
quickly as possible.
RH | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
DO NOT PAY | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here's the reason the Lehman MASTER AGREEMENT has not been executed. SS
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 05:16 PM -----
Stephanie Panus@ENRON
12/21/2000 04:27 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement - ENRON/LBF
FYI - Lehman Master
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron on 12/21/2000
04:26 PM ---------------------------
"Dautenhahn, Kimberly" <[email protected]> on 12/21/2000 04:21:01 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement - ENRON/LBF
Stephanie,
I am following up on the above-referenced Agreement on behalf of Richard
Weiss of this office. Before we can send the execution copies to our Zurich
office for signature, we have to obtain an Apostille for the Certificate of
Incorporation and By-laws which you provided. Presently we are waiting on
that. The Guarantee has been prepared and the legal opinion is in the
process of being signed. I hope to have everything to you by next week
sometime.
Please feel free to reply with any questions you might have.
Thank you,
Kimberly
Kimberly A. Dautenhahn
Transaction Management
Corporate Advisory Division
Lehman Brothers
(646) 836-2011/0609 (fax)
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I knew that you would still be in London. Just thought that I would start to
copy you on some things so that you could begin to get a feel for what's
going on. Yes, I will be in London next week. Plan to fly over on Sunday
night and will be in the office around noon on Monday. I will be there
through Thursday, and will plan to fly back to Houston on Friday. Let's
definitely plan to get together. I am in the throws of bonus reviews at this
moment (I am cooling my heels waiting for HR to get me info on people that
were left off of my sheet), so a little later today I will focus on my
schedule for next week. I will send an e:mail later in the day to see when
we can get together. Looking forward to it. --Sally
Beth Apollo
01/09/2001 03:22 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: January 11 - Managing Operational Risk
I guess you know I am here in London this week wrapping up -- wish I could be
there for this meeting.
Are you still coming next week? It would be good to get together.
Let me know -- I will try to call this afternoon
Beth
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: Sally Beck 05/01/2001 23:57
To: Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT, Diane H
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George F Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Spence/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Couch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S
Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT, Jenny Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica
Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Maxwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joel
Henenberg/NA/Enron@Enron, Vanessa Schulte/Corp/Enron, Connie
Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard C McKeel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd
Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Perun/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Noor
Kaissi/NA/Enron@Enron, Theresa T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jorge A Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark J
Leskowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Snow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Thomason/NA/Enron@Enron, Bradley Samuelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sony
Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E
Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roy Lipsett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nancy Hernandez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christy Lobusch/NA/Enron@Enron, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT (bcc: Beth Apollo/LON/ECT)
Subject: January 11 - Managing Operational Risk
Please join me on Thursday, January 11 from 1:00 to 4:00 pm for a special
information session for the Operations Management teams supporting Enron
Americas, Enron Global Markets and Enron Industrial Markets. We will focus
on assessing, managing and mitigating operational risk. Details on the
location for the meeting will be sent to you early next week.
I look forward to seeing everyone at this meeting on the 11th. The things
that we will discuss will be important for each and every one of you as you
carry out your roles in 2001. I hope that you will make every effort to
attend. Please let me know as soon as possible if you have a conflict that
will keep you from attending the meeting. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We have for the last couple of weeks started to compile the Re-start/Integration Plans for Netco. So far, we have primarily focussed on the mid/back plans where the technology requirements have been the driving factors. Several plans are in the final stages of completion including:-
+ Infrastructure Jenny Rub
+ Development Jay Webb
+ EnronOnline Webb / Forster
+ HR David Oxley
+ Cash Management Tom Myers
+ Credit Debbie Brackett
The rest will be completed shortly.
We now need to focus on the commercial plans which have a slightly different focus. John and I would like to receive the plans "Re-start/Integration" plans by January 7th, 2002 in order to go through them individually with each of you or in groups. The focus should be to ensure that we have as much of the business up and running in the shortest time possible. I have a suggested outline which you do not have to use but I thought it might help. Please decide within yourselves the areas you will cover together or individually.
Customer Side
+ Customers Phase 1 - First Week (eg top 10)
Phase 2 - First Month (eg top 50)
Phase 3 - First Quarter (eg top 100)
+ Action Plan Phase 1 Customers
Phase 2 Customers
Phase 3 Customers
+ Contracts by customers (pre-prepared with credit terms etc)
+ Customer visit schedule
Product Side
+ List of Products Phase 1 - First Week
Phase 2 - First Month
Phase 3 - First Quarter
Target Number of Transactions
+ Phase 1
+ Phase 2
+ Phase 3
IT transfer
Louise | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Heidi, the volume of 100dth on k65403 to CGV1-34 is being cut because of
capacity allocation at mkt-34, you do not have any primary contracts to that
area. Please call Chris Germany for more information.
thanks
joann | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hello Penny,
It was nice meeting you and your associates yesterday. I presented the income tax issue that we discussed to some of our accountants and they see things a little differently. It is our opinion, that since a cash payment would be offset by the demand charge obligations associated with the capacity contract, it is not income per se, but rather funds dedicated to meeting an out-of-the-money contract obligation. Depending on your accounting method, that money would probably be amortized over the term of the contract. Let me know what you think, perhaps we should have our accountants talk.
As for adjusting the cash amount after the San Juan/Permian allocation issue is settled (I'm not sure you could hear all that at your end of the table) we are not really interested in any type of post assignment "true-ups". But we are willing to talk about what those allocation percentages should be.
Regarding next steps, on Monday I will provide you with some "alternative" forms of payment and some ways we might spread the payments out0. After that we will look to you guys for your preferred deal structure and payment terms. I'll follow up this email with a phone call today.
Dave Fuller
Enron North America
503-464-3732 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.