text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Plans for the reporting of the consolidated DPR are:
For trading date Friday, December 28th - No DPR
For trading date Monday, December 31st - Our goal is to publish this in preliminary form by the end of the day Monday, 1/1/02.
Please call me if you have questions or comments about this reporting schedule.
I wish you all a happy New Year.
Regards
Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
<<losers pool.xls>> Here is the spreadsheet with the updated remaining
players. Good luck this week, I can't see any sure things out there. Bob
******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
****************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Alisha,
I called a few of the companies that we had not heard from in awhile. Here's what I found:
Coral - They are waiting on us to get back with them on comments that they sent us early September. (Do you have their comments? If not call, Radie Wilson she said she sent them to us twice)
Unocal - Their legal is reviewing our special provisions.
Hess - I left John Crespo a message, but I would like you to follow up with him too. He is a new contact since Shari Ward left so we may have to start over.
Dynegy - Pat Cokes said that he would call Debra, but please ask her if he called. If he did not, please call him and work on the GISB with him.
Mirant - I left Stephanie Tolbert a message. No response yet.
Pan Canadian - I left Rick Tucker a message. No response yet.
I will let you know if I hear back on those that I have left messages. I appreciate your following up on the others.
I am not really concerned about completing GISBs with the counterparties below. I do not know who initiated contact with them. If we get them, great. If we don't, no
real loss.
AES New Energy
Cypress Natural Gas
Texaco
I appreciate your help. Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Judy
-----Original Message-----
From: Mahabir, Alisha
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:20 PM
To: Thorne, Judy
Subject: GISB Status
Hey Judy,
I recieved your message the other day. Here is a current list of the things I am working on. If you have any questions just let me know.
Alisha
<< File: Status Sheet.doc >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
http://espn.go.com/abcsports/bcs/columns/cunningham_ed/2000/1220/964218.html | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I get in too late tonight, but maybe dinner or drinks on Thurs?
Linda Robertson
06/19/2001 06:39 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Dinner Plans
You are here Wed and Thur nights. Do you have plans? Do you want to do something with some of the DC staff? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mary Hain has resigned her position with Enron. Please remove her from all
your mail lists.
Thank you.
Lysa Akin
Gov't Affairs - Sr. Admin. Ass't.
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Ferranti, Bill" <[email protected]>
03/21/2001 03:57 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Ferranti, Bill"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"Schoenbeck, Don" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "Speer, Jack" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Early, Michael"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Forsyth, Pete"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "Murphy, Paul" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "Bliven, Ray" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: WP-02 Data Response
<<PP-DS.AL-01.doc>> <<PP-DS.AL-02-03.doc>> <<PP-DS-008-009.doc>>
Attached are responses to PP-DS/AL:001-003 and PP-DS:008-009.
Bill Ferranti
Murphy & Buchal LLP
503-227-1011
[email protected]
- PP-DS.AL-01.doc
- PP-DS.AL-02-03.doc
- PP-DS-008-009.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 16; HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
we sold this gas for these volumes to ees for index +0.16.
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001 12:15 PM ---------------------------
Kristann Shireman@EES
05/08/2001 10:12 AM
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joseph Des Champs/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Purchase Malin and Socal Topock
---------------------- Forwarded by Kristann Shireman/HOU/EES on 05/08/2001 10:11 AM ---------------------------
Kristann Shireman
05/08/2001 08:48 AM
To: Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:
Subject: Purchase Malin and Socal Topock
Please provide me with your Physical offer for the following volumes:
The volumes are in monthly volumes.
Thanks
Kris Shireman
MALIN
06/2001: 44,997
07/2001: 41,838
08/2001: 46,070
09/2001: 39,859
10/2001: 37,283
11/2001: 28,038
12/2001: 31,431
01/2002: 23,643
02/2002: 21,228
03/2002: 10,546
04/2002: 15,851
05/2002: 23,528
06/2002: 33,978
07/2002: 32,611
08/2002; 34,332
09/2002: 30,093
10/2002: 28,214
11/2002: 23,518
12/2002: 23,030
01/2003: 17,963
02/2003: 17,820
03/2003: 16,651
04/2003: 15,640
05/2003: 23,212
06/2003: 33,520
07/2003: 32,117
08/2003: 33,878
09/2003: 29,681
10/2003: 27,869
11/2003: 23,155
12/2003: 22,721
01/2004: 17,721
02/2004: 16,973
03/2004: 16,430
04/2004: 15,419
05/2004: 22,896
06/2004: 33,057
07/2004: 31,628
08/2004: 33,431
09/2004: 29,273
10/2004: 27,491
11/2004: 22,843
12/2004; 22,423
01/2005: 17,482
02/2005; 16,748
03/2005: 16,211
04/2005: 15,200
05/2005: 22,585
06/2005: 32,600 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Daily Blessing
Joyful Moments
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless101.htm
Visit Christmas greetings at
http://www.debsfunpages.com/christmas.htm
I just found a really neat site that I hope you'll all check out. With the
holidays coming up it has a great idea for that person you don't know what to
get...but someone you think is the greatest. It's called Unsung Hero and I
know we all have one of those in our lives..check this out and see what they
have to offer. I ordered one today!!
http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjunsunghero.htm
Hundred's of you have taken advantage of the free download available for the
Work From Home folks. If you haven't checked it out yet...you should!!
http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjworkfromhome.htm
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address ([email protected]) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".
OR...
* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.
This message was sent to address [email protected]
X-PMG-Recipient: [email protected]
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
THANKS! I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR SOMEONE TO JUMP ME ON THE APRIL 1 DEAL BUT YOU
ARE THE ONLY ONE SO FAR!!!!! ITS NOT LIKE PEOPLE TO PASS UP A FREE SHOT AT A
LAWYER! DF
From: Bob Stevens/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/09/2001 10:10 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: FW: Organization Announcement
CONGRATS! Is there some underlying meaning in the April First effective date?
-----Original Message-----
From: ETS General Announcement/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-ETS+20General+20Announcement_ET+26S_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com
] On Behalf Of Stan Horton, Chairman & CEO@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:58 PM
To: Enron Transportation Services Operations@ENRON
Subject: Organization Announcement
Michael Moran, currently Managing Director and General Counsel for ETS, has
decided to retire after a distinguished 27-year career with Enron. Mike has
been a conscience and a statesman of our organization and it is hard for me
to imagine the ETS organization without Mike.
Fortunately, Drew Fossum, currently Vice President and General Counsel for
Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern, has accepted my offer to become Vice
President and General Counsel of ETS effective April 1, 2001. Drew will
relocate to Houston and report to me in his new role.
To assist with transition issues and special projects, Mike has agreed to
stay on board for several months as Managing Director and Special Counsel to
the Chairman and will continue to report to me.
Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new assignment and thanking Mike
for his many contributions to ETS and Enron. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
changed to pinnacle west - and you might mention to apb, if you feel like it,
that it would save their time during checkout if they told tom the correct
counterparty when the trade was done - he said apb never seems to know
whether it's APS or pinnacle, but for his part he doesn't mind which
counterparty it's with - anyway, just fyi...
thanks,
Kate
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/15/2001 01:36 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: apb checkosut
551401
broker has pinnacle west
tom a | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I think this is what Dot is looking for. I had it on computer so thought I'd
just email it to you. Thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/10/2000
03:03 PM ---------------------------
From: Drew Fossum 03/08/2000 11:26 AM
To: Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Enron Form 10-K
pls print. thanksdf
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/08/2000
11:25 AM ---------------------------
Sharon Morgan
03/08/2000 09:33 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Enron Form 10-K
Emily Sellers asked that I email the draft of the 10-K to you. It is in 5
sections because we will eventually fold in the financials and the management
discussion pages. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
While recruiting on campus recently I became aware that a decision was made
at the Program level to not interview this fall for 2001 summer interns. In
talking with students and faculty at The University of Texas and University
of Oklahoma, it became clear that there is concern over the feasibility of an
internship with Enron, as other top firms will be recruiting this fall for
summer 2001 interns. I have communicated my concerns to Lexi Elliott and her
manager, Shelley Jones, and was told by both that the decision to delay
interviews for summer interns was made at a Program level based on Enron's
staffing. When I asked about the competitive data available regarding the
practice of other firms on summer intern interviews, I was even more
concerned to discover that neither Lexi nor Shelley had that data. It would
seem critical to know what the competition is doing in terms of summer intern
interview schedules in order to understand the risk that could be created for
Enron by not interviewing this fall for these important feeder positions for
our Analyst and Associates programs.
I have had conversations over the last two weeks with Lexi and Shelley, with
no resolution. When they could not provide the competitive data to either
confirm or eliminate my concerns, I volunteered to have James Scribner, a
Senior Director on my team, obtain this market information. Lexi and Shelley
either did not have the time to gather this data, or were not sure how to do
so. They were pleased to have some help in getting our hands on this
critical information. I now have information at hand with regard to firms
that will be recruiting at UT and OU this fall for summer intern positions.
And based on this information, I believe that Enron is at risk for not hiring
top students as interns for the summer of 2001 if we do not interview for
these positions this fall.
While my research only touches on two of the schools at which Enron recruits,
I want to raise concern over this as a potential problem at many, if not all
campuses that we have targeted for recruiting. As administrators of the
program, you rely on the involvement of senior members of the company to
carry the Enron message to campus. I believe that we also have an obligation
to make this a two-way messaging system. I strongly believe that we must
address this potential risk for Enron extremely quickly, as teams will be on
campuses across the country to conduct interviews in a matter of days. I
suspect that many Enron participants in the recruiting process are unaware of
the Program's decision regarding the timing of interviews for summer
internships. In working with Rick Causey and Mike McConnell, executive
sponsors for UT and OU, respectively, they are as concerned as I about the
decision on interviewing summer interns. I have copied both of them on this
note to the two of you.
Please let me know how this can be resolved. With the help of James Scribner
and others, we have already compiled a list of students at UT and OU that
should be targeted for summer internships. I will offer as much of my time
as is feasible to work with staff members of the Program to devise creative
ways to turn this around. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 05/31/2000
08:35 AM ---------------------------
"Steve Holmes" <[email protected]> on 05/31/2000 08:38:28 AM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Revised June Availabilities
The attached reflects changes to the Sea Robin PVR factors for the June
2000. I have left the DBQ volumes as they were originally set and decreased
the excess volumes.
Please let me know of any questions you have.
Thanks,
Steve
- EnronAvails0600revised4.xls | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We should discuss this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bradford, William S.
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 6:39 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Subject: FW: DWR Again
CDWR is still trying to buy from Enron. What is your view on the current
regulatory status and its impact on DWR credit quality?
Let's discuss.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ngo, Tracy
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Bradford, William S.
Subject: FW: DWR Again
-----Original Message-----
From: Calger, Christopher
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Ngo, Tracy; Yoder, Christian; Sager, Elizabeth; Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Belden, Tim; Kitchen, Louise; Haedicke, Mark
Subject: DWR Again
We have another opportunity to sell to DWR. I have been in discussions with
Ray Hart of DWR and Ron Nichols, their consultant. We are closing in on a
structure that has less upfront risk for Enron with a larger overall short
position in the back. They want to move to contract negotiations next week.
I would appreciate your input. I will arrange a conference call with the
legal and credit teams for Monday to review the status of our EEI contract
and the requirements for this potential deal. Notional terms:
NP-15
Peak
Q301: 100MW
Q401: 100MW
Q102: 150MW
Q202: 200MW
Q302: 250MW
Q402: 300MW
1/03-12/06: 300MW
approx 6MM PV MWhrs
price: $85/MWh | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
[IMAGE] Forums Discuss these points in the Forums: Forexnews Forum Technicals Live Charts Analysis available from: Cornelius Luca J.P. Chorek Technical Research Ltd. Charts & News featuring Standard & Poor's Interest Rates US: Japan: Eurozone: UK: Switzerland: 1.75% 0.15% 3.25% 4.0% 1.25-2.25% [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Sterling Steady After BoE, Markets Now Await ECB February 7, 7:00 AM: EUR/$..0.8665 $/JPY..133.71 GBP/$..1.4108 $/CHF..1.6991 Sterling Steady After BoE, Markets Now Await ECB by Jes Black At 7:00 AM Bank of England Monetary Policy Meeting At 7:45 AM European Central Bank Monetary Policy Meeting At 8:30:00 AM US Jobless Claims (exp 380k, prev 390k) At 3:00:00 PM US Dec Consumer Credit (exp 7.3 bln, prev 19.9 bln) The euro and pound held to a tight range against the majors ahead of today's key central bank meetings. Both the European Central Bank and the Bank of England are expected to hold rates unchanged at 3.25% and 4.0% respectively. Meanwhile, traders will continue to look to Wall Street for direction in the dollar as caution has again taken hold. Market expectations for a rebound in earnings are still seen by many as too optimistic. Therefore, the upside in the dollar is dependant on real economic growth while there is always a risk of a downward surprise. Notably, the dollar failed to capitalize on stronger than expected productivity data on Wednesday as Wall Street came under increasing pressure in the face of investor caution. US stocks finished down after accounting worries, jitters over earnings warnings, and a murky outlook offset a 3.5% rise in Q4 US productivity. The Dow slid 32 points to 9653 and NASDAQ fell 25 points to 1812. Today's futures are unchanged. Company earnings reports include ALLIANZ AG, British Telecommunications PLC, MCI Group, Novartis AG, PepsiAmericas, Royal Dutch Petroleum and WorldCom Inc.-WorldCom Group. The euro was little changed on the day except for a half cent spike higher after ECB President Duisenberg announced that he would retire in July 2003. Traders reacted favorably for the euro because there has been criticism on how the ECB sets its policy as well as the ECB President himself. Other ECB officials were quick to give their support for Duisenberg's decision and Italy's Tremonti says he thinks highly of BoF Governor Trichet as a person. His comment is seen solidifying the unity the ECB has for Trichet as a successor to Duisenberg. The ECB is likely to cite inflationary concerns in January as preventing it from lowering rates this month. But markets are unlikely to react favorably to the ECB's decision due to the subdued outlook for growth this year. The European Commission today said it forecast eurozone GDP will accelerate by anything between 0.1 and 0.4 percent in the first quarter of 2002 compared with the previous quarter. For the last quarter of 2001, today's data confirmed a small 0.1% rise q/q. It would imply that the trough of the recent slowdown is situated in the last quarter of 2001, but also that activity will only moderately accelerate at the beginning of this year," the European Commission said in a statement. As expected, the Bank of England held rates unchanged at 4.0%. Strong consumer spending and a boom in the housing market are offsetting the recession prone manufacturing industry. The net effect is for a relatively healthy economy. But markets may question why the Bank of England today decided to keep rates unchanged. With low inflation and the highest interest rates of either the US or the ECB, manufacturers are likely voice their discontent. However, the BoE is seen wanting to curb domestic demand to avoid a boom/bust cycle in consumer spending. EUR/USD was little changed from its US close after a sharp rebound from a low of 86.45 to a day's high of 86.92 after Duisenberg's announcement. But the euro failed to rise above the psychological 87-cent mark and is again trading in a range of 86.50 to 86.80. Failure to regain resistance at 86.80 is seen calling upon support at 86.35 and 86.00, before another attempt at 86.60. Resistance is seen at 87.10, which marks the 38.2% retracement of the .8953-.8560 move. A rise above that level would target the key 87.50 mark and a breach of this level would be bullish for the EUR/USD. However, only a move above past resistance at 88.60 would really damage the bear trend. GBP/USD fell to a day's low of 1.4085 after breaking support at 1.4115. Cable peaked at a 1-week high of 1.4247 in European trade on Tuesday. But failure to maintain above 1.4110 would call upon key support at 1.4180, which marks the 38.2% retracement of the 1.4418-1.4038 move. Follow up support is seen at last week's 6-month lows of 1.4045. Upside capped at 1.4235, 1.4270 and 1.4300. Meanwhile, the Swiss franc is likely to remain under pressure against the dollar and euro after the Swiss KoF institute said today that their Q401 survey shows the economy will continue to slow in Q102 and not reach bottom until the end of H1. Today's data from the US is expected to show another fall in jobless claims to 380k this week from 390k the previous. This will likely keep the 4-week average below 400k for a second week which is a clear sign of improving labor market conditions. USD/JPY rose to a session high of 134.15 but dealers are likely to remain weary about pushing it beyond the 135 mark give recent comments from Japan's top financial diplomat, Kuroda, that Japan was comfortable with a range of 130-135, for now. Kuroda also said that rapid foreign exchange movements are undesirable. Therefore, given this weekend's G7 meeting, the yen is likely to remain in a tight range against the dollar. Meanwhile, all eyes are on Friday's monetary policy meeting in Japan. Given the resurging pessimism surrounding the Japanese economy, there is a chance the Bank of Japan will take additional easing steps to stop the deflationary trend that menaces the economy. In order to curb the sharp rise in Japanese Government Bonds, the Bank of Japan might surprise markets and increase the outright purchases of JGBs at Friday's policy meeting. Currently they purchase 800 billion worth of JGBs per month and may decide to increase this by 10-25% to around 1 trillion in an effort to increase liquidity and stabilize bond yields. The move would likely weaken the yen. [IMAGE] Audio Mkt. Analysis USD Gives Up Productivity Gains Articles & Ideas Even Koizumi Drags Down the Yen Dollar Does Davos In New York Articles & Ideas Forex Glossary Economic Indicators Forex Guides Link Library [IMAGE]
[IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]
This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you wish to unsubscribe from this or any other Forexnews.com newsletters, please click here . Any opinions expressed by representatives of Forexnews.com or its affiliates as to the commentary, market information, and future direction of prices of specific currencies reflect the views of the individual analyst, and do not necessarily represent the views of Forexnews.com or its affiliates in any way. In no event shall Forexnews.com or its affiliates have any liability for any losses incurred in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken by any party in reliance upon the information provided in this material; or in any delays, inaccuracies, errors in, or omissions of information. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sally,
Below is a draft of the official organization announcement that will address
Brent and his team. I was unable to get this out earlier and am ready upon
your review. Please examine the Brent section and make sure that it is
correct and stated properly. Please send your comments back ASAP and I'll
get this out.
Thanks,
Mike
draft
After having conducted our first of several business reviews, we'd like to
outline the following organizational changes effective immediately.
The Global Risk Markets group under Jere Overdyke illustrates enormous
opportunities given the size of those businesses. To better focus on the
different commercial functions, and to capture market share and value, the
group is being realigned. Jere will continue to manage Global Risk Markets,
and build on our insurance capabilities. Mark Tawney is responsible for our
weather business and will now report to the EGM Office of the Chairman.
Still under consideration - The Enron Corporate Insurance group under Jim
Bouillion will now report into the corporate organization under George
Wasaff.
Brent Price will be joining Enron Global Markets as Vice President and Chief
Accounting Officer. He will report to the EGM Office of the Chairman, and to
Rick Causey, Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer for Enron
Corp. He will be responsible to Sally Beck for the business operations areas
of the businesses. Reporting to Brent in his new position will be Sheila
Glover, business controller for Financial Products; Todd Hall, business
controller for weather; and Scott Earnest, business controller for global
liquids and coal. In addition, Tom Myers as Director of Accounting. Brent
and his team are responsible for all accounting and position reporting issues
for all the businesses within EGM.
Cindy Skinner will join the Enron Global Markets team with responsibility for
Human Resources. She will also report to David Oxley and the HR organization.
Please join us in congratulating everyone in their assignments. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi, Tracy!
Where do we stand on Allegheny? We really would like to finalize this master ASAP.
Thanks!
Marie | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear All,
David Minns has obtained local counsel (ISDA's counsel) on this issue (see
email below). It appears that we can retain the additional wording without
affecting the effectiveness of the close-out netting under the ISDA Master.
Regards, Edmund
---------------------- Forwarded by Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT on 02/28/2001 02:20
PM ---------------------------
David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/27/2001 11:57 PM
To: Edmund Cooper@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Change to standard ISDA Schedule
Edmund let me compliment you on your thoroughness in picking up the issue
with the standard Clause 2(a)(iii) alteration and the Australian Payments
Systems and Netting Act.
The good news is that you may retain your standard wording with Australian
counterparties and not sustain additional exposure. I asked external
counsel to provide a second opinion to confirm my analysis, which I enclose
for your records.
Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Hope you find it of assistance.
David Minns
Senior Legal Counsel
Enron Australia
Phone 612 9229 2310
From: Alan Aronowitz@ECT on 21/02/2001 05:35 PM CDT
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt
cc:
Subject: Change to standard ISDA Schedule
FYI.
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 04:35 PM -----
Edmund Cooper
02/21/2001 12:23 PM
To: ECT London European Trading, T Paul Johnson/EU/Enron@Enron, Janet
Wood/EU/Enron@Enron, Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Slade/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Change to standard ISDA Schedule
Dear All,
In the course of current ISDA Master Agreement negotiations with an
Australian counterparty it has come to my attention that the ISDA netting
opinion for Australia specifies that certain Sections of the ISDA Master
should not be altered; otherwise reliance on the opinion, and close-out
netting, could be jeopardised. In particular the opinion specifies that
Section 2(a)(iii) should not be altered.
Enron has a standard alteration to Section 2(a)(iii) in Part 5 of its
standard form Schedule, viz.
"(a) Conditions Precedent. The condition precedent set forth in clause (1)
of Section 2(a)(iii) shall not apply to payments owed by a party if the other
party shall have satisfied in full all its payment obligations under Section
2(a)(i) and shall at the relevant time have no future payment obligations
whether absolute or contingent, under Section 2(a)(i)."
Obviously, in the case of Australian counterparties this condition precedent
should not be included in our documentation.
In addition, there are a number of other countries (including Germany, Italy,
South Korea and Switzerland) where the effectiveness of the ISDA netting
opinion presupposes that certain Sections of the Master, including Section
2(a)(iii), are not altered in any material respect. To that end I would
suggest that our standard condition precedent does make a material alteration
and that it should not be included in ISDA Master Agreements with
counterparties trading from these jurisdictions.
Certainly from the London end, I think that when we start negotiations with a
new counterparty we should check the ISDA opinions to ensure that we don't
trip ourselves up.
Regards,
Edmund | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi Roly
Welcome back - I'm running to a meeting and then out this week for work and play, but will try to get hold of you next week. work wise, nothing jumps to mind (Azurix as I'm sure you are aware is the best move you never made),, but I will keep my ears open and my thinking cap on.
Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349
-----Original Message-----
From: "Roliff Purrington" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Roliff+20Purrington+22+20+3Crpurrington+40austin+2Err+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 6:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: work
Hi, Liz -
I am back in Houston after a couple of months in Europe and Virginia
and am starting to look around for work post MDCK. If you hear of
anything, I would appreciate your keeping me in mind. I would most like to
find some sort of special project work where I can fill a need part time
and get to know some folks rather than jumping in head first into a
permanent spot.If there is anyone else I should contact who might have
some ideas I would appreciate hearing about them as well.If you have a
chance , could you send me Kerry galvin's email address? Iam at 512 653
3063. Thanks. RP | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I have asked my legal department about this a couple of times and I'm not sure if we have sent you anything. Would you please just send me a GISB agreement out of your shop. I see you have spoken to EES already.
Thanks
Chris L. Germany
Manager, Gas Trading
Phone 713-853-4743
Fax 713-646-3059
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael McCall <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: contact info
Chris:
Nice talking to you. I hope we can get some things going. Please don't
hestiate to call if you need something. I'll look for that GISB.
Best Regards
Michael McCall
Vice President
Sempra Energy Trading
58 Commerce Rd.
Stamford, CT 06902
(203) 355 5085
Cell (203) 912 2030
Fax (203) 355-6090
**********************************************************************
This e-mail contains privileged attorney-client communications and/or confidential information, and is only for the use by the intended recipient. Receipt by an unintended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any applicable privilege."
Reading, disclosure, discussion, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient or his or her employees or agents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us and delete the original material from your computer."
Sempra Energy Trading Corp. (SET) is not the same company as SDG&E or SoCalGas, the utilities owned by SET's parent company. SET is not regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission and you do not have to buy SET's products and services to continue to receive quality regulated service from the utilities."
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear Dr. Kaminski,
Thank you for the follow up. I will keep you posted
when I hear from EBS.
Jun
At 05:41 PM 10/25/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Martin,
>
>Can you, please, call Shu and provide him with information about EBS?
>
>Vince
>
>---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000
>05:46 PM ---------------------------
>
>
>Jun Shu <[email protected]> on 10/23/2000 07:27:49 PM
>
>To: [email protected]
>cc:
>Subject: Info about Enron's Bandwidth Market
>
>
>Dear Dr. Kaminski,
>
>I enjoyed your talk this afternoon at IEOR very much.
>I wonder if you could point me to some information
>resource on Enron's bandwidth market.
>
>I am a Ph.D student at IEOR. I work with Professor
>Oren and Professor Varaiya from EECS department on
>the topic of pricing the Internet. In particular, I am designing
>pricing mechanism in the framework of the DiffServ
>architecture which is the latest proposal made by
>IETF to provide scalable service differentiation.
>I would very much like to get in touch with people
>in Enron working on the similar topics.
>
>Thank you very much.
>
>Jun Shu
>http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jshu
>
>
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
anytime after 3 pm today i will be leaving today at 4.45 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Deal # 377169 has been revised today effective 4/19/01 as follows:
C/P Meter # Trade Zone From To
Cokinos 98-9842 07 0 3,000
Bob | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
With respect to the ECT Merchant Investments Corp. and ENA contract and the
St. Mary's Production, LLC and ENA contract (Gary Bryan's "Preston" deal),
Melissa Graves and I will assume responsibility for having our records and
deals properly updated. We would also be happy to perform the same task for
the Entrada/Crescendo contracts if you wish.
In any event, we need copies of the conveyancing documents for at least the
"Preston" deal and, if you wish us to update the Entrada/Cresendo deal also,
the conveyancing documents for that deal too.
George x3-6992
Teresa G Bushman
12/25/2000 09:13 PM
To: Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesus
Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: VPP's get syndicated
I don't know the answer to that. Does someone else?
Teresa
Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX 77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
[email protected]
Joan Quick
12/24/00 04:35 PM
To: Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jesus Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: VPP's get syndicated
When the existing VPP's get syndicated into Brazos later this week, then they
will be between Brazos [not Entrada] and Crescendo, and Brazos [not ECT
Merchant...] and St. Mary's, who is the person responsible for making sure
that the ENA contracts group makes the name change [assignment], and that
everything in ENA's internal system - Sitara gets changed accordingly? And
also to make sure that these deals do not get duplicated?
thanks | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
It the dark recesses of my mind I recall that Honey has a form to fill out.
However, that doesn't keep us from distributing $. We just need to keep
enough to pay CT to file the documents.
Congratulations, that was quite a feat.
Time for a Fish wake?
Kay
"Turner, Gerry (Allstates)" <[email protected]> on 07/14/2000 08:17:31 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Angler's
OK-----I finally have the last (Bailey) signature on those going out of
business documents. What shall I do with them? When can we write checks
and be done with all this?
Gerry Turner | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This is to confirm and update the schedule information relative to the
Wheatland Facility due diligence visit.
1.) Persons Attending:
Mr. Barry T. O'Brien, Aquila Energy Corporation, Vice President of
Technical Services
Mr. Gene Russell, UtiliCorp United (AEC's parent), Director of
Environmental Services
Mr. Ray Racine, Waldron Engineering, Inc., Technical Consultant
Mr. Racine and Waldron Engineering, Inc. are
technical consultants to Aquila Energy Corporation; the firm and the
individual are obligated under a Confidentiality Agreement that extends to,
through, and including the provisions of the CA between Enron and AEC for
this matter.
2.) The party will travel from Evansville on the morning of Thursday,
October 26. Due to the travel time from Evansville, it will be necessary to
reschedule the commencement of the meeting at Wheatland to 9:00 AM.
3.) If you have any questions or concerns regarding the Wheatland Visit,
please contact Mr. O'Brien. Telephone: (816) 527-1789 or via e-mail:
[email protected].
Regarding the Gleason Facility:
Please be advised that I will not be visiting the Gleason Facility on
Wednesday, October 25, as prevously scheduled. You may consider this visit
cancelled.
Best regards,
H. Dana Smith
Aquila Energy / Merchant Energy Partners
1100 Walnut Street, Suite 3300
Kansas City, MO 64151
Direct Telephone: (816) 527-1137
Facsimile: (816) 527-1006
E-mail: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
April 16, 2001
Notice No.: 01-132
List of Proposed Nominees
for Election to the Board of Directors of
NYMEX Holdings, Inc.
Please be advised that the following persons were recommended as proposed
nominees for the Board of Directors of NYMEX Holdings, Inc.:
1. Recommended as Proposed Nominees for &Equity Holder8:
(THREE vacancies)
(Terms expiring 2002, 2003 and 2004)
Cataldo Capozza
Joseph Cicchetti
Steven Crystal
Stephen Durante
Steven Errera
Joel Faber
Gary Lapayover
Stanley Levin
David Lazarus
Michel Marks
John Moore
Stephen Renov
Robert Sahn
David Sherman
Sol Tanne
Howard Wolfson
James Zamora
2. Recommended as Proposed Nominees for &Futures Commission Merchant8:
(ONE vacancy)
(Term expiring 2003)
John McNamara (JLMC)
Stanley Meierfeld (STAN)
Peter Meyer (WIM)
3. Recommended as Proposed Nominees for &Public8:
(ONE vacancy)
(Term expiring 2002)
George Burman
Melvyn Falis
Lee White
ONLY PERSONS WHOSE NAMES HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATE
SECRETARY BY 5:00 P.M. ON MONDAY, APRIL 16, 2001 WILL BE PERMITTED TO STAND
FOR ELECTION.
Please note that in order to qualify as a Public Director, a person must be
knowledgeable of futures trading or financial regulation or otherwise capable
of contributing to the deliberations of the Board of Directors and may not be
a member of the Exchange or affiliated with any member of the Exchange or an
employee of the Exchange.
After Monday, April 16, 2001, the Membership Subcommittee (&Subcommittee8)
will convene to make its determination as to the eligibility of the proposed
nominees to run in the category for which he was proposed or otherwise.
Such determination will be immediately posted. Should the Subcommittee
determine that a proposed candidate is ineligible to run in the category for
which he was recommended, written notice thereof shall immediately be
submitted to that person. To assist the Subcommittee, NYMEX members may
submit information regarding the eligibility of a proposed nominee to the
Subcommittee. All such submissions must be received by 5:00 p.m. on
Thursday, April 19, 2001 at the Office of the Corporate Secretary. In
addition, a proposed nominee may appeal the Subcommittee,s categorization.
Such appeal must be made by 5:00 p.m. on April 20, 2001. The Subcommittee
will consider the appeal and make a final ruling no later than April 23,
2001. At that time, the Subcommi!
tt!
ee will assign the proposed nominees to the proper categories, regardless of
the category for which the proposed nominee was originally recommended.
TO BE OFFICIALLY NOMINATED, EACH PROPOSED NOMINEE WILL BE REQUIRED TO FILE
WITH THE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATE SECRETARY A DECLARATION WHICH STATES THAT
CATEGORY IN WHICH THE PERSON INTENDS TO STAND FOR ELECTION. FAILURE TO
SUBMIT A DECLARATION TO THE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATE SECRETARY BY 5:00 P.M. ON
TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2001 WILL RENDER THE PROPOSED NOMINEE INELIGIBLE TO RUN IN
ANY CATEGORY.
Please note: only those persons who were proposed by 5:00 p.m. on Monday,
April 16, 2001 will be permitted to be officially nominated.
The Record Date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote will
be April 25, 2001.
The Candidates, Forum will be held on May 9, 2001.
Proxy statements and ballots will be mailed on or about May 1, 2001.
The election will be held on Wednesday, May 23, 2001.
Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Christopher
Bowen at (212) 299-2200 or Donna Talamo at (212) 299-2372.
__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.
"http://208.206.41.61/email/[email protected]&refdo
c=(01-132)"
Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
TO: Advisory Committee Members
FROM: Paul R. Kleindorfer
Howard Kunreuther
Date: March 12, 2001
Subject: Our Next Advisory Committee Meeting
Just to let you know that our next Advisory Committee Meeting will be on
Thursday, June 14, 2001. We will be sending the agenda and more details in
late March or early April. The principal theme of this meeting of the
Advisory Committee will be "Markets and Regulation for Efficient Risk
Management".
We would appreciate your letting Theresa Convery know your attendance by
returning a completed response form (copy attached) via fax or email as soon
as possible.
FAX: (215) 573-2130
PHONE: (215) 898-5688
EMAIL: [email protected]
<<Response Form.doc>>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Theresa Convery
Administrative Assistant
Risk and Decision Processes Center
The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
(215) 898-5688/Fax: (215) 573-2130
[email protected]
- Response Form.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The report named: NG - Price P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=10&report_name=NG+-+Price+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y¤t_efct_date=10/25/2001>, published as of 10/25/2001 is now available for viewing on the website. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please use the following address to contact us.
Cathy: [email protected]
and
Larry: [email protected]
Please change your addressbooks, we'd hate to miss an email from you.
Larry & Cathy | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Calpine Eastern Corporation, Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, L.P., Mirant New
England, LLC, Mirant Kendall, LLC, and Mirant Canal, LLC filed a complaint against ISO New England
with respect to its unilateral modification of Market Rule 5 and Appendix 5-C of the
New England Power Pool (NEPOOL) FERC Electric Rate Schedule No. 6, through which ISO-NE has excluded external energy contracts from its calculation of the Energy Clearing Price since September 1, 2001.
Interventions in this proceeding are due this week; please let me know immediately whether we have a specific interest. In any event, I will circulate an update of any FERC action on the complaint.
Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here's the latest...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001 09:28
AM ---------------------------
Ron Tapscott@ECT
01/24/2001 07:56 AM
To: Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: new version of letter to Lynn Dekrey (SW) on 501d5a
Matt,
I have attached a letter we plan to send today (or, tomorrow at the latest)
and require copies of letter's from SW that Dan Schultz references in his
Nov. 10th letter. In addition, there is another matter regarding other
correspondence we need to have in hand that other letters reference. Most
notably, a reference to a request from Scott Laidlaw (dated January 12, 2001)
noted in Lynn DeKrey's letter on January 18, 2001.
Absence of this correspondence jeapordizes our claim! We need to close the
loop on this information so we know our response is appropriate.
Kay -- the attached letter is a newer version from the one you received
yesterday. I would appreciate any input you may have.
Thanks, Ron. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This counterparty is not set up in GCP as an Agent, only as Alliant Energy
Corporate Services, Inc. We have no power contracts with this entity as set
up in GCP or in the agency name. There are deals in Enpower under the
corporate name and they are confirmed under the GTC.
From: Kelly Lombardi @ ENRON 04/19/2001 11:40 AM
To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: EOL Rush: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc., as Agent
Rhonda or Melissa:
Please respond to me on approving the product, East PHy. Power under Alliant
Energy Corporate Services, Inc., as Agent, so EOL can do their rush tomorrow.
Thanks:
Kelly@5-8491
---------------------- Forwarded by Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001
11:28 AM ---------------------------
From: Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 10:57 AM
To: Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: EOL Rush: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc., as Agent
Kelli,
Please review for us East PHy. Power We will do a rush approval tomorrow,
once I can pull the cp across. Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Stephanie
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Tana
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Sever, Stephanie
Cc: Sacks, Edward
Subject: EOL Rush: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc., as Agent
Legal is OK to open the above counterparty immediately for US east physical
and financial power products. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Nancy,
Thanks for the wonderful turn around time!
I glanced through the interconnect. It includes arbitration (poor Dutch) and
equipment outage as force majeure. Gee, what's good for the goose should be
good for the gander.
Talk to you soon,
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Eddie,
We'll need a new pipeline for Northwest manual entry. The point should have DRN JPINV, but no corresponding IHS DRN. Please populate the database with a value of 16,460,301 with flow type S for 6/2/2001. We will manually enter this point until we can automate it.
Mat | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Could you check on this. It should not apply to me. Thanks very much.
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/12/2001 10:43 AM -----
Tara Rafter/ENRON@enronXgate
03/12/2001 10:40 AM
To: Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Margaret
Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Fitzgerrell/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Howard
Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Hetrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean
Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Alberto
Levy/SA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate,
Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Stella
Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vinio Floris/Corp/Enron@Enron, Xi
Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tracy Cooper/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allison
Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron,
Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robin
Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rochelle Lessner/ENRON@enronxgate, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky L Merola/TNPC/EES@EES, FRED
MILLER/ENRON@enronxgate, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou L
Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christie
Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott
Reblitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Thomas S
Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Frank Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave
Schafer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shepherd/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Terence H
Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron,
Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: FW: 2000 Lobbying Expenses
As of yet, I have not yet received your completed lobbying questionnaire. If
it is in the mail, please disregard this message. If it is not in the mail,
please fill out the questionnaire as soon as possible and return to me via
email or interoffice mail so that we can be in compliance with Federal income
tax laws. If you did not engage in lobbying activity in 2000, a short email
to that effect is sufficient. Many thanks for your cooperation.
Tara Rafter
Director
Corporate Tax Planning
-----Original Message-----
From: Tara Rafter
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 12:08 AM
To: Daniel Allegretti; Joe Allen; Scott Bolton; Stacey Bolton; Roy Boston;
Hap Boyd; Rob Bradley; Jeff Brown; Margaret Carson; Wiley Cauthen; Tom
Chapman; Carolyn Cooney; Shelley Corman; Jeff Dasovich; Tom Delaney; Linda
Fitzgerrell; Howard Fromer; Janel Guerrero; Mary Hain; John Hardy; Joe
Hartsoe; Nancy Hetrick; Jean Ryall; Aleck Dadson; Robert Hemstock; Alberto
Levy; Ron McNamara; Mike Roan; Thane Twiggs; Steve Walton; Ricardo Charvel;
Kikumi Kishigami; Harry Kingerski; Stella Chan; Vinio Floris; Xi Xi; Tracy
Cooper; Dan Staines; Kathleen Sullivan; Kerry Stroup; Alan Comnes; Marcie
Milner; Donna Fulton; Allison Navin; Lora Sullivan; Stephen D Burns; Tom
Briggs; Linda Robertson; Robert Neustaedter; Gloria Ogenyi; Patrick Keene;
Robert Frank; Joe Hillings; Tom Hoatson; Stan Horton; Barbara A Hueter;
Richard Ingersoll; Paul Kaufman; Steven J Kean; Jeffrey Keeler; Robin Kittel;
Susan M Landwehr; Leslie Lawner; Donald Lassere; Lara Leibman; Rochelle
Lessner; Chris Long; Dave Mangskau; Kathleen E Magruder; Susan J Mara; Sandra
McCubbin; Becky L Merola; Janine Migden; FRED MILLER; Mary Kay Miller; Steve
Montovano; Bill Moore; Sue Nord; Christi L Nicolay; Lou L Pai; Sarah Novosel;
Christie Patrick; Mona L Petrochko; Scott Reblitz; Marchris Robinson; Thomas
S Reichelderfer; Fred Rimington; Frank Rishe; Cynthia Sandherr; Gavin Russo;
Dave Schafer; Richard Shapiro; Tom Shelton; Richard Shepherd; Jeff Skilling;
Lon Stanton; James D Steffes; Michael Terraso; Henry Van; Terence H Thorn;
Kathleen Wagner; Susan Worthen; Charles Yeung; Robert Wilson; Lisa Yoho
Cc: James Sandt
Subject: 2000 Lobbying Expenses
Please provide your assistance in completing the attached questionnaire
relating to 2000 lobbying activities. I would like to receive all completed
questionnaires on or before March 9, 2001. If you have any questions, please
feel free to contact me at 713-345-8362. Thanks so much for your help.
Tara Rafter
Director
Enron Corp. Tax Planning | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
By the way, did you resolve Zachary's "fund" issue? Sas
ps I'm going to call you when I get a break. I learned that I have a ticket
to the game on Sat. Oh, joy!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000
10:32 AM ---------------------------
"Cohen, Alec" <[email protected]> on 04/20/2000 08:32:56 AM
To: "'peter grancaric'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'Rex B Walker'"
<[email protected]>, "'Robert Deraney'" <[email protected]>,
"'Rudge, Neal'" <[email protected]>, "'Sara Shackleton'"
<[email protected]>, "'Senequier, Herve'" <[email protected]>,
"'Steinberg, Leonard'" <[email protected]>, "Tam, Michael"
<[email protected]>, "'Tom DiVivo'" <[email protected]>, "'tom
ford'" <[email protected]>, "'Tudo, Mark'" <[email protected]>,
"Whitefoot, Joanne" <[email protected]>, "'Wickstrom,
Daryl'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: Humble Pie - This one is worth a read...
-----Original Message-----
From: Cohen, Alec
Sent: 20 April 2000 14:25
To: Abukhadra, Omar; Greenberg, David; Salaman, Erinn; O'Donnell, Dan; 'Adam
Cohen'; '[email protected]'; 'Alan Rogowsky'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; 'bill 3west'; 'Brock, Bill';
'[email protected]'; 'Campodonico, Peter';
'[email protected]'; 'David Alexander'; 'David Maier'; 'Deborah S. Levine';
'[email protected]'; 'Elshorbagi, Mostafa (London)'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; 'Garrison Witten'; 'Gilad Merioz'; 'Grancaric,
Peter'; 'Gregory Kerr'; 'J Wynne-Williams'; 'James Ramos'; 'JC Calciano';
'Lawrence, Peter'; 'May, Bill'; 'May, Edward J (Edward)'; '[email protected]';
'Michael Nazworth'; 'Moran, Mike'; 'Nel Bloom'; 'Nicole Neuefeind'; 'Otho E.
Kerr III'
Subject: FW: Humble Pie - This one is worth a read...
> Sing this to "American Pie."
> Humble Pie
>
> A long, long week ago
> I can still remember how the market used to make me smile
> What I'd do when I had the chance
> Is get myself a cash advance
> And add another tech stock to the pile.
>
> But Alan Greenspan made me shiver
> With every speech that he delivered
> Bad news on the rate front
> Still I'd take one more punt
>
> I can't remember if I cried
> When I heard about the CPI
> I lost my fortune and my pride
> The day the NASDAQ died
>
> So bye-bye to my piece of the pie
> Now I'm gettin' calls for margin
> 'Cause my cash account's dry
> It's just two weeks from a new all-time high
> And now we're right back where we were in July
> We're right back where we were in July
>
> Did you buy stocks you never heard of?
> QCOM at 150 or above?
> 'Cos George Gilder told you so
> Now do you believe in Home Depot?
> Can Wal-Mart save your portfolio?
> And can you teach me what's a P/E ratio?
>
> Well, I know that you were leveraged too
> So you can't just take a long-term view
> Your broker shut you down
> No more margin could be found
>
> I never worried on the whole way up
> Buying dot coms from the back of a pickup truck
> But Friday I ran out of luck
> It was the day the NAAAASDAQ died
>
> I started singin'
> Bye-bye to my piece of the pie
> Now I'm gettin' calls for margin
> 'Cause my cash account's dry
> It's just two weeks from a new all-time high
> And now we're right back where we were in July
> Yeah we're right back where we were in July
>
> copyright Sean Brady 2000
>
>
*************************************************************************
The information in this internet E-mail is confidential and is intended
solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it
by anyone else is unauthorized. Any views or opinions presented are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
Credit Lyonnais or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended
recipient please contact [email protected]
************************************************************************* | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
CP,
Attached is the latest draft copy of the memo. Each group has had an
opportunity to comment and it has been amended several times.
I would like you to take a look at it and add your comments and changes. You
are always the key to a good memo and your changes are vital to making this a
first rate memo. Also Freight is in blue and i don't know how to take it
back to normal.
I would like this out on Tuesday evening. After i get your version back, go
ahead and make your changes directly on the memo. Please send to Jeff for
final review and one more pass thru the business units on Monday.
Thanks,
m | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sam, I took a quick look at what Mona had done and had a few clarifying
changes. Let either of us know if you need more help. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks, Paul. I will be looking forward to this. Please give me a call today or tomorrow. I would like to get something in place by Friday afternoon. I am reviewing all our preliminary nominations today.
Thanks,
Jack
-----Original Message-----
From: Lucci, Paul T. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Enron West Gas Pricing
Jack,
Here is our pricing sheet that goes out everyday. We've added you to the list so you should receive this daily. If for some reason it doesn't starts howing up please give me a call.
Paul
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I wish to pick up Sylvester Morris - KC and drop Derrick Mayes Sea. My
fantasy points
bid for Morris is 6 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
As a follow up to my message last week on charges for Analysts, I am
attaching the file that Financial Operations used to charge your RC with the
$6,400 in monthly costs that I detailed below. I have received a few calls
and E-mails stating that some reclasses need to be made because you no longer
have an analyst in your group. The information used by Financial Operations
to charge your RC was obtained from the Org Database. Please review the
attached files for January and February to ensure that the proper RC was and
is going to be charged. If you have any corrections, please contact Brian
Heinrich at Ext. 5-7677 ASAP since journal entries will need to be processed
by this Friday, March 3rd.
If you have any questions, please call me. I just want to let everyone know
that it is important that we continue to keep the Org Database updated as
changes are made. It is and will continue to be the source of headcount
information for Energy Operations. Thank you for your continued support in
this process.
Lisa Cousino
x3-6343
--------------------- Forwarded by Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2000 06:52
PM ---------------------------
Brian Heinrich
02/28/2000 01:44 PM
To: Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: AA Headcount
Lisa,
This is the file we used for January, and the one for February.
Brian
Lisa B Cousino
02/24/2000 01:13 PM
To: Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Evelyn
Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa
T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunaid Engineer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, John
Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Roy Lipsett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E
Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dorothy Ricketts/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W
White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Bennett Kaufman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian Heinrich/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sandra R McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex
Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretel Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julissa Marron/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly
Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine
Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ragayle Pellum/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rosalinda Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patti
Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Monthly Charges for Analysts on your RC report
I wanted to let all of you know how you will be charged for Analysts if you
currently have or will have one in your RC for the year 2000. The analyst
program is being handled differently than it was in 1999. In addition to the
normal salary, benefits and payroll taxes, you will also be charged an
overhead administration fee for the program. You will be charged the
following MONTHLY amounts for each analyst in the Detail Class code that I
have indicated below:
Detail Class Description Amount
1 Salaries and Wages $4,000
552 Benefits 774
557 Payroll Taxes 360
820 Corporate Services 1,266
Total MONTHLY Cost $6,400
The $4000 amount represents an average of all analyst salaries and does not
indicate what the analyst in your RC is paid. This amount will not change in
February as the $4000 already includes merit raise information for 2000.
The $1266 represents the overhead costs of administering the program,
including campus recruiting and office visits.
When you look at your RC report, you will see a line item labeled "A and A
Reclass" in each of the Detail Classes identified above. Enron North America
is invoiced by Corp. for the costs of all analysts. Financial Operations
makes a manual Journal Entry each month to charge the appropriate RC. Please
check your January 2000 RC report and make sure you were properly charged for
the correct number of analysts you have currently. If there are any errors,
please let me know as soon as possible so that I can work with Brian Heinrich
to have it corrected in February. Please continue to check your RC report
each month going forward. Thanks.
If you have any questions, please call me.
Lisa Cousino
x3-6343 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI GUYS
-----Original Message-----
From: Shelton, Tom
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Schneider, Steve HPL; Simunek, Jack; Cocavessis, Nick; Soldano, Louis;
Nutt, David; Purvis, Kyle
Subject: Grandfathered Facilities - Endangered Species With No Prospects o f
Protection
FYI. Who else needs to know? I am sure this will be discussed at length at
the next Intrastate Pipeline Association meeting on June 22 (to be hosted by
Redmond at Enron's/HPL's offices).
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 09:55
AM ---------------------------
"Dees, Allan W (Skip)" <[email protected]> on 05/10/2001 09:28:53 AM
To: "'Jan L Laughlin'" <[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], Cindy Morphew
<[email protected]>, Dan F Hunter <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
"Kazimi, Faheem M." <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Joe Kaufman <[email protected]>, Johnny Casmore
<[email protected]>, Ken Rigsbee <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], "Hewitt, Richard RW SCC" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], "Dees, Allan W
(Skip)" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Carter, Patricia A [Newcos]"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Dees, Allan
W (Skip)" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Broussard, C G [Newcos]"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: Grandfathered Facilities - Endangered Species With No Prospects o f
Protection
FORWARDED TO TxOGA REFINERY ENVIRONMENTAL AND PIPELINE COMMITTEES
-----Original Message-----
From: Dees, Allan W (Skip)
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 9:28 AM
To: 'Morphew, Cindy (TXOGA)'; 'Miksa, Mary (TABCC)'; 'Romero, Celina
(Clark Thomas Winters)'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; 'Mills, Alex (NTOGA)'; 'Stevens, Bill (WCTOGA)';
'Hughes, Wayne (PPROA)'; 'Burns, Morris (PBPA)'; 'Fleming, Martin (TIPRO)';
Wade, Foster L; Abernathy, Linda (El Paso Natural Gas); Adamson, Terry (BP
Amoco); Aliberti, Marilena (Shell Western E&P); Anderson, Lisa; Blossom,
Stanley (Kerr McGee); Braun-Fishman, Karla (Santa Fe Energy Res.);
Broussard, Gweneyette (Equilon); Butler, Donald (Hunt Oil); Cavazos, Hector
(Chevron); Cortez, Naomi (El Paso Natural Gas); D'Attilio, Wendy (El Paso
Energy); Davis, Frank (Anadarko); De Nicola, Mike (Chevron Pipeline); Dees,
Allan W. (Skip); Dorsey, Gina (KinderMorgan); Dougherty, Barbara (Devon
Energy); Dover, Wilbur (Pioneer); Emery, Dave (Phillips); Fish, Marilyn (EOG
Resources); Frederick, Bubba (Spirit Energy/UNOCAL); Galusky, Peter
(Marathon); Garcia, Irene (ExxonMobil); Gillen, Darrell (Williams Prod);
Golemon, R Kinnan (BMOH); Greer, John (KN Energy); Gutierrez, Hugo A.
(Marathon); Hathaway, David C. (Phillips Petroleum); Hutson, Margaret
(Conoco); Hutton, Nina (Cross Timbers Oil Co.); Knoeller, Craig (Exxon);
Kriter, Kurt (Amerada Hess); Landry-Huey, Traci (Phillips Petr.); Laughlin,
Jan (Phillips); LeBlanc, David J.; Maddox, Scott (Phillips Pipeline);
Malter, Paul (Burlington); Mangels, Lynn D; Martinez, Rosemary (Amoco);
McCay, R. Scott; Milliet, Michael P.; Montgomery, Gene (OXY Permian); Moore,
Susan (BP-Amoco); Muslih, Khalid (Coastal); Nolan, R. M. (Exxon); Pachulski,
Jim (Crescendo Resources); Parra, Alvaro (Williams Energy Services);
Phillips, Marc (Enron Pipeline); Portz, Bruce (Western Gas Resources);
Riddle, Mark (Hunt Petroleum); Sandilos, Bob (Chevron U.S.A.); Searle, Dave
(Marathon); Sebree, Ben (TXOGA); Sellars, Don (Chevron); Sellers, Tom
(Conoco); Smith, Michael (Chevron); Sorel, Kesner (Duke Energy); Starrett,
Mike (Altura Energy); Stephenson, Mark (Mitchell); Templet, David
(Mitchell); Travis, Lynn (Devon Energy Corp); Wadsworth, David (Maxus
Energy); Waisanen, Peggy (OXY Permian); Wilhelm, Jack (Mobil Oil Corp);
Wilson, Pamela (ExxonMobil); Wolford, Cheryl (TEPPCO); Zygmunt, R. W. (Shell
Offshore)
Cc: Hall, Larry R; Mire, Kerry A; Head, James A; Botes, Peter J; Turner,
Kim A; Hoover, Clay R; Smith, Todd M; Harvey, Ralph V; Dibble, John T;
Chisholm, Duane N; Milliet, Michael P; Boswell, Jerry C; Lee, Arthur;
Wenker, Judith A; Montgomery, Kathy A; Padon, Linda D; Palmer, Frederick B;
Demeter, Rebecca M [Newcos]; Demeter, Rebecca M. [Star]; Wimberley, William
F [Newcos]; Wimberley, William F. [Star]; 'Thurman JR (James)'
Subject: Grandfathered Facilities - Endangered Species With No
Prospects of Protection
The days of grandfathered facilities in Texas are numbered. This does not
only mean those large facilities in nonattainment areas, but ANY facility
that was constructed prior to September, 1971 and has not subsequently been
rolled into some sort of new source review (NSR) permit or Permit by Rule
(formerly Standard Exemption). Note that proposed new rules recently
published in the Texas Register for public comment will require operators to
be able to produce documentation of applicability and compliance for all
facilities authorized by a Permit by Rule/Standard Exemption, much the same
as is required for any other type of permit.
The TNRCC Sunset Bill contains language limiting the time that such
facilities may operate without NSR authorization of some sort. The Senate
Committee Substitute (SCS) for HB 2912 is a little stricter than the version
passed by the House, but both versions did contain grandfathered facility
permitting provisions and it is safe to assume that the final version will
also. If this version passes, you will have one additional year to apply
for a Voluntary Emissions Reduction Permit (VERP). If your facility is a
pipeline facility, the TNRCC will require no more than a 30% reduction in
NOx, and that reduction can be averaged for several facilities in the same
area covered in one permit.
Note that it is only through the efforts of our lobbyists - particularly
Cindy Morphew of TxOGA and Celina Romero of ATINGP - that it looks as though
we will get an additional opportunity to get these facilities permitted
without having to use today's BACT.
This memo summarizes the SCS provisions for your information. This is NOT
actual bill language - I've TRIED to make it easier to read.
Note that these provisions may be changed somewhat if the House does not
concur in all of the changes made by the Senate and the bill goes to
Conference. In addition, we expect a strong attempt to amend the bill on
the Senate floor to require shutdown on September 1, 2001 of grandfathered
facilities that do not have a pending permit application. If that attempt
is successful, the opportunity to apply for a VERP will be gone on September
1.
The memo also recaps previous recommendations to you regarding the current
opportunity to claim historical Permits by Rule (Standard Exemptions) as a
means of permitting a grandfathered facility. I am not certain how long
this opportunity will continue to exist. TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT WHILE YOU
CAN.
In addition, I've appended some information on 10-year old BACT for
gas-fired IC engines and turbines that might be useful if you are trying to
get a VERP now.
PROVISIONS OF SCS FOR HB 2912 (PRIOR TO SENATE FLOOR DEBATE)
Sec. 382.05181. PERMIT REQUIRED.
(a) Any grandfathered facility that does not have an application pending
for a new source review permit or other authorization, other than a federal
operating permit, and that has not submitted a notice of shutdown as
provided in Section 382.05182 may not emit air contaminants on or after:
(1) September 1, 2003, if the facility is located in a
nonattainment area; or
(2) September 1, 2005, if the facility is located in an attainment
area.
(b) Any grandfathered facility that does not have a permit or other
authorization under this chapter, other than a federal operating permit
permit, may not emit air contaminants on or after:
(1) September 1, 2005, if the facility is located in a
nonattainment area; or
(2) September 1, 2007, if the facility is located in an attainment
area.
(c) Facilities eligible for a Small Business Stationary Source Permit are
subject to the permitting deadlines in Section 382.05184.
Sec. 382.05182. NOTICE OF SHUTDOWN.
(a) A notice of shutdown to allow operation of a grandfathered facility
beyond the deadlines of 382.05181(a) must be filed with the commission
before the applicable deadline.
(b) A notice under this section shall include:
(1) the date the facility intends to cease operating;
(2) an inventory of the type and amount of emissions that
will be eliminated when the facility ceases to operate; and
(3) any other necessary and relevant information the
commission by rule deems appropriate.
GENERAL PROVISIONS (APPLICABLE TO PERMITS UNDER 382.05183, 382.05184, AND
382.05186)
(a) The commission shall grant a permit under this section if, from the
information available to the commission, including information presented at
any public hearing or through written comment, the commission finds that
there is no indication that the emissions from the facility will contravene
the intent of this chapter, including protection of the public's health and
physical property.
(b) If the commission finds that the emissions from the facility will not
comply with Subsection (c), the commission may not grant the permit under
this section.
(c) A person planning the modification of a facility previously permitted
under this section must comply with new source permitting requirements
before modifying.
(d) The commission may adopt rules as necessary to implement and administer
this section.
(e) If an applicant omits any relevant facts or submits incorrect
information in an application, the applicant shall submit the relevant facts
or correct the information no later than 60 days after discovering the
error. If while processing the application, the commission determines that
additional information is necessary to evaluate or to take final action on
the application, the commission may request the information and set a
reasonable deadline for a response. Failure to comply with the deadline for
the response will result in the application being returned to the applicant.
Sec. 382.05183. EXISTING FACILITY PERMIT.
(a) The owner or operator of a grandfathered facility may apply for a
permit to operate the facility under this section.
(b) The commission shall grant a permit under this section if, from the
information available to the commission, including information presented at
any public hearing or through written comment, the commission finds that the
application:
(1) is filed before September 1, 2002 and the facility will
use an air pollution control method at least as effective as 10-year old
BACT; or
(2) is filed before the applicable deadline of 382.05181(a)
and the facility will use current BACT.
(c) The commission may issue an existing facility flexible permit for some
or all of the grandfathered facilities at a site. Permits issued under this
subsection shall follow the same permit issuance, modification, and renewal
procedures as existing facility permits.
Sec. 382.05184. SMALL BUSINESS STATIONARY SOURCE PERMIT.
(a) Grandfathered facilities that are located at a small business
stationary source and are not required by commission rule to submit an
annual emissions inventory report may apply for a permit under this section
before September 1, 2005.
(b) Grandfathered facilities that are located at a small business
stationary source that does not have an application pending for a new source
review permit or other authorization, other than a federal operating permit,
and that has not submitted a notice of shutdown, may not emit air
contaminants on or after September 1, 2007.
Sec. 382.05185. ELECTRIC GENERATING FACILITY PERMIT.
Special provisions for permitting grandfathered electric generating
facilities are not outlined in this memo.
Sec. 382.05186. AUTHORIZATION FOR PIPELINE FACILITIES.
(a) The commission by rule shall establish the procedures for applications
for grandfathered processing, treating, compression, or pumping facilities
connected to or part of a gathering or transmission pipeline.
(b) Based on a prioritization by the commission as necessary to meet local,
regional, and statewide air quality needs related directly or indirectly to
federal air quality standards, the commission may require up to a 30%
reduction of the hourly emission rates of NOx and VOC from reciprocating
internal combustion engines subject to this section. For facilities other
than reciprocating internal combustion engines that are connected to or part
of a gathering or transmission pipeline , the commission may consider
requiring hourly emissions rate reductions of up to 30% for NOx and 20% for
VOC. The commission by rule may designate counties or regions of the state
where greater reductions in the hourly emission rate will be required than
in other areas, but no more than 30 percent reductions in the hourly rate
may be required in any area.
(c) The commission shall:
(1) allow for a single permit for all facilities connected
to or part of a gathering or transmission pipeline;
(2) allow for required reductions for facilities under this
section to be achieved at one facility or averaged among more than one
facility and located in the same local, regional, or statewide areas
designated by the commission under Subsection (b);
(3) for purposes of emission averaging, allow emission
reductions achieved from grandfathered since September 1, 1997; and
(4) allow an owner or operator to apply for separate
permits under this section for discrete and separate facilities connected to
or part of a gathering or transmission pipeline.
(d) Facilities authorized by this section shall be considered permitted
under this chapter.
CURRENT OPPORTUNITY TO CLAIM A PERMIT BY RULE TO "PERMIT" A GRANDFATHERED
FACILITY
TNRCC has interpreted its rules to allow operators to permit grandfathered
facilities using any applicable "Permit by Rule," including those previously
referred to as Standard Exemptions.
For instance, old Standard Exemption 7, effective May 8, 1972, was for "Gas
fired internal combustion engines of less than 2000 hp and engine trains of
less than 5000 hp total" and can be used to permit any such engine(s). For
clarification on this particular exemption, the language used by staff in
proposing this exemption to the Texas Air Control Board in 1972 was as
follows: "Engines smaller than 2000 hp are quite numerous and are not
considered a substantial source unless joined together IN SERIES (emphasis
added) to form an engine train. Engine trains of less than 5000 hp are not
considered a substantial source. Because control technology for NOx
emissions from internal combustion and gas fired engines is very limited, it
is doubtful if significant control could be achieved through the permit
system at this time." ("Exemptions From Permits Procedures and
Justification for Exemptions," <signed> Charles R. Barden, P.E., Executive
Secretary, Texas Air Control Board, May 8, 1972.)
A list of the "Historical Standard Exemptions" is available on the TNRCC
Website at http://www.tnrcc.state.tx.us/air/nsr_permits/oldselist/index.html
<http://www.tnrcc.state.tx.us/air/nsr_permits/oldselist/index.html> . In
applying these "Permits by Rule," be sure to check the corresponding
"Exemption Preambles" (if any) for any applicable General Conditions.
TNRCC has asked that we document such permitting of grandfathered facilities
by PI-8 AND a simple notification cover letter to them so that they will
have a record that the facilities have been permitted and are no longer
considered to be grandfathered. The registration will buy you a letter of
acknowledgement that you have claimed the "permit by rule" (don't use the
term "exemption" in any correspondence) for these engines.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH TNRCC ON 10-YEAR OLD BACT FOR GAS ENGINES AND TURBINES
From: Celina Romero [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 1:52 PM
To: [email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Response to 11/21/00 Teleconference 001204
I believe that we have now gotten the last bit of information that the TRNCC
will provide to us regarding the development of guidelines for 10-year BACT
for grandfathered engines and turbines for use in the VERP program. The
last piece of information is an email that I am forwarding to you with this
email. It is an email from John Steib to which he attaches an email from
Jim Linville. In response to a request from us, Jim Linville sets forth in
his email an example of a large engine with emissions in the 29 gram per
horsepower hour range that cannot reduce emissions to the 2-8 gram level and
what the owner/operator of that engine must demonstrate in order to obtain a
VERP permit.
Remember, that in order to be included in the TNRCC's January 15, 2001
report to the legislature, a letter of intent or application for a VERP
should be filed with the TNRCC on or before next Thursday, December 7, 2000.
To summarize, we have obtained the following policies from the TNRCC:
1. Grandfathered internal combustion engines of less than 2000
horsepower can be authorized by Standard Exemption No. 6 effective December
1, 1972, regardless of the level of emissions from those facilities. (See my
letter to Kerry Drake dated September 15, 2000 and Drake's letter to me
dated October 3, 2000).
2. Grandfathered engine trains of less than 5000 horsepower, or a
portion of an engine train up to 5000 horsepower may be authorized under
Standard Exemption No. 6, December 1, 1972, so long as each engine in the
train does not exceed 2000 horsepower. (See my letter to James Randall
dated November 1, 2000 and Randall's letter to me dated November 16, 2000).
3. Grandfathered turbines of less than 20,000 horsepower may be
authorized by Standard Exemption No. 82, dated December 1, 1972 regardless
of the level of emissions. (See my letter to Kerry Drake dated September
15, 2000 and Drake's letter to me dated October 3, 2000).
4. Grandfathered engines and turbines that are able to be controlled to
the 2-8 gram range will not be subject to an economic reasonableness review.
(See James Randall's letter to me dated November 16, 2000).
5. Grandfathered engines and turbines that are not able to be
controlled to the 2-8 gram range may be permittable under a VERP if there is
test data to validate the old (pre-modification) and new (post-modification)
emission rates to document that verifiable reductions in actual emissions
would be achieved. Also needed would be a representation of the cost of the
controls and even though additional modifications are available, the
additional cost is prohibitive. (See Jim Randall's letter to me dated
November 16, 2000 and the email attached hereto).
I hope all of this is helpful. I have forwarded to you copies of the
referenced letters by fax on earlier dates. If you need another copy please
let me know.
Celina
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Linville [mailto:[email protected]]
<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:36 PM
To: [email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: James Randall
Subject: Response to 11/21/00 Teleconference
Celina and James,
During our teleconference today, you asked for an example of what we would
consider "significant emission reductions" that would be acceptable in a
case-by-case review when the 2 to 8 g/hp-hr NOx level could not be achieved.
A large 2-stroke engine that is currently emitting approximately 29 g/hp-hr
of NOx would be considered to have significant emissions reductions if
actual emissions are reduced by 50 percent even though it does not meet the
2 to 8 g/hp-hr NOx level. We would agree that this would have been
considered BACT 10 years ago if there was test data to validate the old
(pre-modification) and new (post-modification) emission rates to document
that verifiable reductions in actual emissions would be achieved. Also
needed in the case-by-case review would be a representation of what the cost
of the controls would be with a discussion of why the 2 to 8 g/hp-hr NOx
level could not be achieved. This may be due to technical limitations such
as no additional controls or modifications are possible, or you may identify
cost in dollars per ton of NOx controlled to show that even though
additional modifications are available, the cost is prohibitive.
-----Original Message-----
From: Celina Romero [SMTP:[email protected]] <mailto:[SMTP:[email protected]]>
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 9:45 AM
To: [email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];>
[email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];>
[email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected];> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: letter from TNRCC re 10-yr BACT
I received by fax late yesterday evening, a letter signed by John Steib re
10-yr BACT guidelines for engines and turbines for use in the VERP program.
After my first read, it looks pretty good. Look for a copy of it by fax.
Let me know if you have any comments or concerns that we need to clear up
with the TNRCC.
Celina
November 16, 2000
Ms. Celina Romero
Attorney
Clark, Thomas & Winters
P.O. Box 1148
Austin, Texas 78767
Re: Permitting Grandfathered Internal Combustion
Engines and Turbines
Dear Ms. Romero:
As discussed in our meetings and teleconferences concerning the options for
grandfathered internal combustion engines and turbines, we have agreed that
some of these facilities may qualify under Standard Exemption Nos. 6 or 82,
effective on December 1, 1972 and others may be permitted under 30 Texas
Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 116, Subchapter H: Voluntary Emission
Reduction Permits (VERP). Specific questions raised are discussed below.
You have asked for our understanding of what qualifies as an "engine train
of less than 5,000 hp." In your November 1, 2000 letter you gave two
examples of "engine trains" that you felt would meet Standard Exemption No.
6, "Gas fired internal combustion engines of less than 2000 hp and engine
trains of less than 5,000 hp total." We agree that several engines, each
less than 2000 hp, can be combined into a "train" providing compression to a
common header so long as the train does not exceed 5,000 hp, meet the
exemption requirements. In cases where the total horsepower in a train
exceeds 5,000 hp, we will allow exemption of individual engines within such
a train provided that each engine is less than 2000 hp and the total
horsepower of exempted engines in the train does not exceed 5,000 hp. In
the same standard exemption list, turbines were covered by Standard
Exemption No. 82, "Gas turbines of less than 20,000 hp burning sweet natural
gas."
The other major point of discussion has been the determination of "10 year
old BACT" required by 30 TAC o116.811(3)(A). As we discussed, our review of
permitting 10 years ago reveals that very few, if any, old engines were
permitted; so no data is available to show what we would have required for
nitrogen oxides (NOX) best available control technology (BACT). New engines
were permitted at 2 grams/horsepower-hour (g/hp-hr) of NOX for both rich
burn and lean burn engines. At that time older rich burn engines could have
been readily upgraded with catalytic converters to meet this 2 g/hp-hr limit
for NOX. Lean burn engines were and are still more problematic as both
2-stroke and 4-stroke versions are available, and no single method of
control is applicable. The large number of different engine manufacturers,
and the availability of various models, makes it impossible to establish a
single 10 year old BACT level. Some of the older engines may be capable of
being upgraded to meet a level of NOX of 5 to 8 g/hp-hr, the level
established in the 1992 revision of Standard Exemption No. 6, which also
established a 3 g/hp-hr standard for turbines. While the standard exemption
does not establish BACT for upgrades it does recognize what is available.
Many of the grandfathered engines are large and some have emissions as high
as 25 to 29 g/hp-hr, so significant emission reductions may be achievable
even if they are not able to reduce to the emissions control level of 2 to 8
g/hp-hr. The 10 year old BACT review on these engines and turbines will
have to be done on a case-by-case basis just as we would have done 10 years
ago.
We hope this guidance will allow your members to decide which engines they
will be able to either exempt or permit under the VERP program and submit
their letters of intent to participate in the VERP program by December 7,
2000.
For engines and turbines that your members decide to propose for
authorization under Standard Exemption Nos. 6 and 82, please identify the
specific engines and turbines, identified by unit number, emission point
number (EPN), air quality account number, and plant name; and for each
account please submit a Form PI-7. For each engine or turbine, please
submit a, Table 29 or 31 as applicable, and other technical information that
will support the standard exemption claim.
For engines that will be authorized by a VERP permit, please identify each
engine by unit number, EPN, air quality account number, and plant name, and
provide an estimate of the amount of emissions reductions anticipated as a
result of participation in the VERP program. When the VERP applications are
submitted, information should be provided to show that NOX emissions will be
in the 2 to 8 g/hp-hr range. If it is not possible to achieve this level of
emissions, please submit information that shows that it is not technically
feasible or economically reasonable to control NOX emissions to that level.
Information showing that actual emissions reductions will be achieved, even
when the targeted range of 2 to 8 g/hp-hr cannot be met, will be helpful in
staff review of the application.
We appreciate your assistance in helping us to make the VERP program a
success. If you have any further questions, please contact Mr. James
Randall, P.E. at (512) 239-1078.
Sincerely,
John F. Steib, Jr., Director
Air Permits Division
Office of Permitting, Remediation & Registration
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
JS/JR/jo | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Chris looked these over and we agreed to just re-send the original
confirmation letter, because the ISO may make cuts again - in fact, the
revised confirm is no longer correct. I put a comment in the deal instructing
no revised confirms to be sent, per Chris Foster.
Also, Chris noticed that the counterparty contact name in the letters was
incorrect. The new contact at ARCO is Alicia Izarraraz. Her number is (562)
499-3234. I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Kate
From: Sharen Cason 01/24/2001 01:00 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: more on #500966
This is the original confirmation letter we sent out.
Unfortunately, before I found out anything about all this, I sent out a
revised confirmation when the deal was changed and went into a pending
status. This is the revised confirmation letter that went out.
These are the only two that have been sent to the counterparty. I have put a
note into the TAGG system that should let us know not to send another revised
confirmation.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks for the phone list. Kimberly Hundl is soooo jealous! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
GT, How is it going? Man, was that an ass-whipping or what that we took
from OU. Looks like we salvaged some dignity with the CU game.
I was planning on coming in for the Missouri game. I might have my brother
and another friend with me. How are you set for space. Those guys could
crash on the couches, if its not a problem with you. If it is a problem,
just let me know and we can make other arrangements.
Talk at ya later
G | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
To view this email with images click below.
http://gap.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4137798448X1071513X72413X
********************************************************************
15% OFF ANY $50* PURCHASE ONLINE
********************************************************************
TO REDEEM: Enter the gap.com coupon code LOWRISE at checkout.
Hurry, offer good through August 11, 2001
Start shopping: gap.com
http://gap.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4137798448X1068740X72413X
Send this email to a friend:
http://gap.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4137798448X999470X72413Xtracy.geaccone%40enron.com
Start Shopping:
gap.com> http://gap.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4137798448X1068740X72413X
gapkids.com> http://gap.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4137798448X1068745X72413X
babygap.com> http://gap.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4137798448X1068746X72413X
Hassle-free Return Policy:
http://gap.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4137798448X999474X72413X
Privacy Policy:
http://gap.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4137798448X999473X72413X
Questions? Feedback? Email us or call 1.800.GAP.STYLE
http://gap.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4137798448X999472X72413X
We sent you this email because you asked for updates about new
products and promotions. If you'd like to change how often you
hear from us, please click here:
http://gap.m0.net/m/s.asp?HB4137798448X999471X72413X
If you'd rather not receive email updates from Gap, you can
delete your name from our email list by clicking here:
http://gap.m0.net/m/u/g.asp?e=tracy.geaccone%40enron.com
* 15% offer is good for one transaction only. Offer valid through
August 11, 2001, at 11:59 p.m., PT. $50 amount applies to merchandise
only. GiftCard purchases, packaging, taxes, and shipping & handling
does not count toward the qualifying amount. Not valid for cash. No
adjustments on previous purchases. Offer is not transferable without
consent by Gap. Not valid at Gap Outlet stores. Cannot be combined
with any other offers. Gap Inc. employees are not eligible for this
offer. GapCard double points offer applies to all GapCard purchases
at Gap stores, gap.com, and 1.800.GAP.STYLE (in the US only). Offer
subject to credit approval by Monogram Credit Card Bank of Georgia. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 1/2/02; HourAhead hour: 19; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010219.txt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We will be holding floor meetings on the following dates. Please join us for
a general overview and Q&A session on one of the following floors:
Tuesday, 4/17/01 - 2:00 - 3:00 p.m. Location: In front of EB2711
Wednesday, 4/25/01 - 2:00 - 3:00 p.m. Location: In front of EB2265
Thursday, 4/26/01 - 2:00 - 3:00 p.m. Location: In front of EB2556
Philippe & Greg
Please disregard the email sent on 4/6/01. We apologize for any
inconvenience. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001 01:22 PM -----
"Travella, Delene M." <[email protected]>
01/23/2001 06:40 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Enron North America Corp. ("ENA") ISDA with First Union Natio
nal Bank ("FUNB")
Hi Sara,
Thanks for your email. Please see responses below:
Delene M. Travella
Vice President
Capital Markets, Derivatives
Telephone: (704) 383-8778
Facsimile: (704) 383-0575
email: [email protected]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 7:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Enron North America Corp. ("ENA") ISDA with First Union
> National Bank ("FUNB")
>
> Hi, Dee:
>
> A few pieces of information from credit.
>
> 1. With respect to ENA's swap counterparty, we note that the rated entity
> per S&P is "First Union National Bank, Charlotte". You need to let us
> know
> which entity is in fact the swap party.
>
[Travella, Dee] The swap party is First Union National Bank.
"First Union National Bank, Charlotte" is not a legal entity. If S&P is
including the city where we are headquartered as part of our legal name,
they are incorrect. Is it possible for you to forward the S&P document that
you are referring to and I will have our corporate relations people look
into it.
> 2. Regarding Threshold for cross default, $100,000,000 is fine.
> [Travella, Dee] Thanks.
>
>
> 3. Regarding financials, if you want to provide us with First Union Corp.
> financials, we will need a guaranty and credit will switch to the
> guarantor.
>
[Travella, Dee] First Union National Bank doesn't prepare annual
statements. We can provide quarterly call reports (with year-to-date
information), which is also available on the FDIC page (www.fdic.gov). First
Union Corporation's annual financial statements are available on EDGAR and
First Union Corporation's home page (First Union National Bank is a
principal subsidiary).
> 4. 10 year bonds are OK with a haircut (probably 90 or 95%). [Travella,
> Dee] -ok
>
> 5. Credit is still reviewing the matrix [Travella, Dee] -ok
>
> 6. Your changes to the MAC trigger are fine. [Travella, Dee] -ok
>
> 7. Your comments to our definition of "Qualified Institution" have been
> rejected. [Travella, Dee] Do you know what the objection is?
>
> 8. The $30,000,000 cap on the Enron Corp. guaranty is fine. [Travella,
> Dee] Thanks
>
> I'll try to follow up with you tomorrow. [Travella, Dee] Look forward
> to hearing from you, Dee
> Sara
>
>
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron North America Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
> Houston, Texas 77002
> 713-853-5620 (phone)
> 713-646-3490 (fax)
> [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
"Siao, Vivian" <[email protected]>
01/03/2001 04:59 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Leh, Ted" <[email protected]>
Subject: Goldman, Sachs & Co
The Goldman Sachs Client Access Agreement (the "Agreement") and/or Schedule
A -- Electronic Trading Services ("Schedule A") are attached for your review
and signature. The Agreement and Schedule A are required for each legal
entity whose trading personnel are enabled to access Goldman Sachs'
electronic systems. The documents must be signed by an authorized signatory
of the legal entity(ies) that employs each enabled person. The list of
persons within your organization that have been enabled to access Goldman
Sachs electronic systems and their associated legal entity(ies) are listed
below. If the Legal Entity name is incorrect, please indicate the
appropriate name for purposes of this Agreement and Schedule A. Please list
all enabled users and their corresponding legal entity on Schedule A-ETS
Authorized Users. You may add additional users or delete ones that are
currently enabled.
Enabled users Legal Entity
Harry Arora Enron NA
Please complete, date and sign both the Agreement and Schedules separately.
Please pay special attention to the following points:
* At the top of the document -- "Client:" Fill in the legal name and
the address of the entity that will execute both the Agreement and Schedule
A. If the document is intended to cover more than one entity, please list in
a separate annex each entity that the document covers.
* Next to the line "Attn:" Fill in the name and title of the
authorized person that is signing the document on behalf of the legal
entity.
Please return the completed and signed documents via fax to:
GS contact: Vivian Siao
Fax: 212-428-1872
Phone: 212-902-1429
Any questions regarding the Agreement or Schedule A should be directed to
the GS contact listed above.
<<Client Access Agreement.pdf>> <<generic e-trading ver3.sch.pdf>>
<<Authorized User Annex to Schedule A-ETS.pdf>>
Vivian Siao Stephan
Fixed Income, Currency & Commodities Compliance
Tel: (212) 902-1429
Fax: (212) 428-1872
- Client Access Agreement.pdf
- generic e-trading ver3.sch.pdf
- authorized user annex to Schedule A-ETS.pdf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Louise, find attached a draft copy of the announcement for your review/revision. When do you plan to make this announcement ?
Frank | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
fyi - do you want to see this on a daily basis? We do this daily and we do a
weekly summary on Wednesdays.
Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 03:55
PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Adam Johnson @ ENRON 02/05/2001 03:54 PM
To: Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Cummings/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brandon
Wax/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hal Elrod/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Segura/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith Couch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tina
Spiller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marla
Thompson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wendy King/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Terri
Fiandt/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron,
Marc Eichmann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Schlueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simone La Rose/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Peter Berzins/NA/Enron@Enron, Marla Thompson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Terri
Fiandt/NA/Enron@ENRON, Martin Holmes/LON/ECT@ECT, Darren Gurner/LON/ECT@ECT,
Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Clickpaper Executive Summary for 2/2/01
Clickpaper Executive Summary for 2/2/01
Transaction Summary New in Prior
24 Hours LTD
External Transactions 6 186
Notional Value of Deals Completed $111,370 $662,676,860
Notional Tonnage of Deals Completed 460 tons 1,111,780 tons
Notional Board Feet 338,000 BF 19,633,000 BF
Notional Square Feet 0 SF 2,410,000 SF
Registration Activity New in Prior
24 Hours LTD
Registered Clickpaper Users 0 321
Guest ID's Issued 0 2,409
Credit/Legal Review in Process 2 32
Credit Declined with Process Complete 0 3
Number of Password Applications Received 6 420
Products Offered New in Prior
24 Hours LTD
Number of Financial Products Offered 0 60
Number of Physical Products Offered 0 65
Counterparty Activity
Number of Counterparties Having Transacted to Date 35
New Counterparties Transacting for the First Time Today 0 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
05:21 PM ---------------------------
Vince J Kaminski
01/08/2001 01:10 PM
To: Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Reminder
Sandeep,
I am meeting Jeff on Tuesday, 1:30.
The best number to reach me (outside the office) is my cell phone
(always on): 713 410 5396.
My home number is 281 367 5377.
Vince
Sandeep Kohli@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/06/2001 08:30 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reminder
Vince,
Before leaving for India I just wanted to jot you this small reminder to talk
to Jeff Shankman on Monday.
Aside from myself, I wanted to remind you to talk about Anshuman Shrivastava,
who is currently Assistant Manager in India, and has my recommendation for
promotion to Manager. He is our point person on many DPC matters, and is
also the person I have used on most fuel related issues. He will be a real
asset to Jeff when located in HOuston. Sinc he is single, and quite young,
it will not be a problem to move him here at short notice.
I will call you from India as soon as I get in. It will be Monday evening in
Houston at that time, so could you please jot me a note telling me what would
be a good number to call you on.
I look forward to working with the team in Research.
Thanks again,
Regards,
Sandeep. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Vince,
FYI to give you background for tomorrow's telephone conference
Steve is really a home-run hitter
Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
09:26 AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Stephen Bennett @ ENRON 04/12/2001 09:02 AM
To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: London Status Report
Hi Mike,
Before we meet with Vince tomorrow - I thought we should drop you a line and
give you an idea as to what's been accomplished in the first week as well as
some of the challenges and problems we've run into. This way we can make the
most effective use of Vince's time.
1) Current Products and Customers
In our first 3 days - we established 6 different customer groups -
representing approximately 40 traders plus additional fundamentals and
analytics folks. The groups are: UK Trading, Gas Fundamentals, Crude
Trading, Weather Derivatives, Continental Power, and an internal trader
newsletter.
We've built the following framework to address these customers - the key
deadlines are noted:
0800: UK Trading/Weather Derivatives/Fundamentals: Prepare a 1 to 5 day UK
specific forecast and assess the 12z runs of the ECMWF (and ensembles), the
AVN as well as EarthSat's 1-5 day outlook. The traders are particularly
interested in the performance of the ECMWF as it feeds all of their demand
models. We prepare a 1 page summary and give an idea as to any particular
forecast biases - whether we feel things may come in warmer or colder than
the model. We brief the traders and field questions then provide our report
to the fundamentals group.
** In the future we would like to be able to gather raw data from the AVN and
MRF to provide a series of choices which could be input into their demand
models or at least be able to give them our "best pick" of guidance and how
we feel things may deviate from that pick.
1030AM: Obtain the UK Met 6-10 and 1-5 day forecasts. Provide comment for
UK Trading.
1200: UK Trading/Crude and Products/Weather Derivatives: Prepare a full
qualitative analysis of 0z models (MRF/NOGAPS/CANADIAN/Ensembles). Produce a
6 to 10 day Europe forecast and make any needed adjustments to the 1 to 5 day
forecast. Produce the Global Weather Report including a Global Executive
Summary; Analysis of Teleconnections and their expected impact; 1 to 5 and 6
to 10 day forecasts compared to EarthSat; A 10 day city forecast table for
European Cities along with the expected effect on heating demand and finally
A "port status report" describing weather and port conditions in 11 worldwide
ports. Update traders (UK and Wx Deriv) on changes or new trends in the 0z
models. Provide a quality assessment of the UK Met 6 to 10 and 1 to 5 day
forecast for UK Trading.
1330 (Mon-Wed): Brief the Crude and Products groups in London and Houston.
1600: Review 12z AVN for any major forecast changes and communicate changes
to traders.
Weekly: Produce a weather article for "Critical Mass" - internal trading
newsletter.
Of course between 1000 and 1330 we are looking closely at the US weather for
support to you guys in Houston. I'm still writing the daily US Executive
summary as well as producing a 6 to 10 day US forecast.
2) Requested Projects:
* Gas Fundamentals has asked us to provide weather information for their
morning report and website. They would like to be able to gather objective
output from as many forecast models as we can get.
* Weather Derivatives has asked for week ahead, month ahead, and seasonal
outlooks for temperature and precipitation. They have also asked about
creating a tradeable "NAO Index" and developing an in-house model for
forecasting NAO.
* Continental Power has asked for temperature and precipitation outlooks for
power generation and hydro.
* Gas Fundamentals, UK Trading, Continental Power, Weather Derivatives and
Crude and Products have all asked for a European Summer Outlook for
temperature and precipitation. We expect to have this completed tomorrow.
* The research group has asked for assistance in gathering climate data
across Spain for temperature and precipitation.
3) Leads to Follow Up On:
* Elsa in Houston asked us to contact some of the Softs traders here and let
them know once we were up and running.
* Contact Chris Mahoney to determine if we can provide and additional support
for Crude and Products.
* Follow up on a potential morning breifing for Continental Power
4) Challenges:
* We've been told that we will be moving locations next week - which might
entail corrupting or loosing the software and hardware configurations that
have taken almost a week to get fully established. It seems that this office
functions on a "hot desk" system where people are constantly moving around.
This will make it very difficult to stay connected - as well as very
difficult for our customers to identify us.
* Administrative detail take an inordinate amount of time. Assembling
reports both physical and electronic can take nearly as long as actually
preparing the reports!
---
Mike,
OK - I think that brings you up to speed. I've been amazed at the amount of
feedback we've already gotten and we've only been here 3 days! On that note
I wanted to let you know that I am fully committed to this project. It seems
that we will not have a second meteorologist to assist Tony by my planned
departure date on the 20th. As such - I can continue in my current role
through my planned vacation - keeping me in London until the 27th - which is
my current reservation back to Houston. I am also open to remaining in
London beyond the 27th to ensure the success of this project.
Hopefully this gives you a good idea as to what's gone on in the first few
days here. We look forward to talking to you later today and with you and
Vince tomorrow. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I think its ok because its not a unilateral termination right--its a termination right triggered by a changed circumstance that upsets the basic bargain of the parties. If I'm wrong let me know. Per Steve Harris, it may be pretty tough to get anyone to agree to such a term in the first place, so it might not matter. DF
From: Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/27/2001 09:31 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate, Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate, Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: Red Rock form contract
I thought a pipeline having unilateral termination rights was a problem under Natural. Maria
-----Original Message-----
From: Fossum, Drew
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 8:29 AM
To: Miller, Mary Kay
Cc: Pavlou, Maria; Scott, Susan; Harris, Steven; Hyatt, Kevin; McCoppin, Dorothy; Corman, Shelley
Subject: RE: Red Rock form contract
I like the new language, but have added a couple of changes in the redlined version attached hereto (I think mine are in blue). One of the changes is for clarity and one is to make the contract terminable at our option instead of automatically terminated if the neg. rate is invalidated and our max rate is lower than the Rate [we may want to preserve the contract in that scenario if the market value is even lower than the max. rate!!] On MKM's point, I think the only contract we have sent out is to CalPine, right??? I think we explain it to them as a mechanism that is designed to preserve our benefit of the bargain if FERC changes the rules in the middle of the game. If they choke on it, we probably have to take the risk with them since they are are our baseload tenant. As to other shippers that we haven't sent the contract to, we ought to push very hard to get language like this. I'm sending to Shelley and Dot to get their insight. Dot--have you guys done anything analogous in your precedent agreements on the many Florida projects? Not necessarily on neg. rates, but FERC-outs in general? DF
<< File: FERC out amendmentrl.doc >>
From: Mary Kay Miller 03/26/2001 05:13 PM
To: Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate
Subject: RE: Red Rock form contract << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>
These changes look good to me, but how are we going to communicate this without raising a big flag that we are concerned with negotiated rate deals? MK
From: Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 04:13 PM
To: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: RE: Red Rock form contract
Here are my suggestions. Thanks, Maria
<< File: FERC out amendment.doc >>
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott, Susan
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Fossum, Drew; Harris, Steven; Hyatt, Kevin; Pavlou, Maria; Miller, Mary Kay
Subject: Red Rock form contract
At Drew's request I've drafted the attached language to address the possibility that FERC might change its negotiated rate policy statement or otherwise invalidate the negotiated rate in the contract. Stan brought this idea up at this morning's staff meeting (for those of you who, like me, weren't in attendance). Please comment.
<< File: FERC out amendment.doc >>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Weather Headlines
Monday February 4, 2002
Pattern has a colder look to it this morning, while the Southern storm
track shows signs of action. Eastern ridge gone while arctic air tries to
reload to the Northwest.
This may be the first time this winter a forecast understates the cold
rather than overstates it. Part of it stems from the snowcover in the
Plains, but most of it simply did not give the European enough credit for
its SE rotation of a Canadian air mass. I do believe its transient though
with some moderation in order by midweek and the five day numbers taken as
a whole still are not that cold relative to normal. In many ways, this will
be similar to what happened in late December with the largest departures
from normal in the South. That will be due more from an active storm track
rather than any real intrusion of arctic air. Speaking of southern storms,
we see rain breaking out across much of Western and Northern Texas today.
This system will bring rain to much of the old South the next couple of
days. There is some potential for SE coastal development later in the week
which could be a Mid-Atlantic snow. But, I am more bullish on the next
system in the series which could be a big storm over the weekend. While its
turning colder in the East, often times we see a reversal in the West. That
does not appear to be the situation in this case. Cold air is trapped in
much of the region and the upper level flow is not favorable to scour this
out. A gradual moderation may occur, but it still looks below normal.
The main stories in the 6-10 day period is whether or not the storminess of
the European models and the cold showing up in the Canadian verify. The
most extreme solution obviously would be a combination of the two, but that
seems unlikely given the results of this winter so far. Of the two, I give
the storm proposition the most weight. It is possible the East coast could
see a sizeable snow out of all of this. As for the cold, the Canadian since
the middle of last week has been rebuilding pressures in the NW
territories. They become quite high this period, but are still North of the
border. It once again becomes a wait and see game to see if some of this
real arctic air can come down. That, I am not ready yet to commit to.
However, the overall pattern certainly looks colder than January did and
for many could run below normal this period.
For the period Monday February 4 through Friday February 8, expect the
following temperature trends:
Average 4 to 6-degrees below normal: Intermountain West ...
Average 1 to 3-degrees below normal: Desert SW, California, Gulf Coast,
Southeast, Northeast...
Average 1 to 3- degrees above normal: Great Lakes, Ohio and Mississippi
Valleys, Mid-Atlantic, Rockies, Southern Plains..
Average 4 to 6-degrees above normal: Northern and Central Plains...
Andy Weingarten, Meteorologist APB Energy / True Quote | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This works for me-- please confirm if the call is going forward
"JOANNE BENNETT" <[email protected]>
10/30/2000 12:30 PM
To: "GLENN LESLIE" <[email protected]>, "WEB MACDONALD"
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Monday, October 30 conference call
Dan Fournier would like to have a conference call today at 3:00 Calgary time
to discuss the Project Stanley file.
?
Please let me know if this works with your schedule.? If so, the dial in
number will be 1-888-265-0030, participants pass code - 618 929.
?
Thanks,
Joanne
Assistant to Dan Fournier
? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Can I get that PRC list from you when its on one page. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
What is the asking price on the Muela Creek ranch?
Also, I am thinking about taking a trip to South Texas in the next few weeks. Possibly, Thursday Oct. 18 - Saturday Oct. 20.
Can someone show me the Rosita Ranch?
Thanks,
Scott Neal
(713) 853-4723
[email protected] [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: F.X. O'Neil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 3:25 PM
To: scott neal
Subject: Re: Webb Co. ranch
Hi Scott, yes unfortunetely that ranch sold several months ago. I take it your still looking on that area? I'll call you later this week so we can talk about some other properties that might work for you. Feel free to call whenever you get a chance as well. Talk to you soon.
FX O'Neil
Meek Ranch Sales | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
As far as i know, we can get together tomorrow night.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Thomas W. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:58 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:
Hey, but when are you going to the dome tomorrow???? would there be time to get together?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Thompson, Thomas W.
Subject: RE:
couldn't agree more. was just kidding.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Thomas W. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 12:26 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:
sure, no prob, coke? Really, truly, I intend to be quite normal and no fuss. This is good for me.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Thompson, Thomas W.
Subject: RE:
meet for a drink after work?
-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Thomas W. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 12:21 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:
Things is good. Our new ORA director is really engaging and starting to make some shifts around here. good to have someone who cares, is competent, and tough.
I'm off the bottle for a few weeks to get a true read on my cholesterol. Seems alcohol is processed first by the liver and is converted quite readily into fats that then become precursors to cholesterol .... Feels good, easy to do......
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Thompson, Thomas W.
Subject: RE:
talked to karen. thought we'd do bolinas weekend after your b-day. andw e're around the weekend of your b-day, it's just that i've got class all day that saturday. i think if karen's overly uncomfortable, we should just do the four of us. we can always do dinner with david and nina.
how's things?
-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Thomas W. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:53 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:
When you guys going to the dome? will we be able to get together for a few minutes before you depart on Friday? Perhaps we could sit in front of one of your PCs and look a possible weekend spots for my b-day.
Also, I'd like to discuss the david thing....I'm interested in your view......
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Shirley,
Am I registered?
Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
02:23 PM ---------------------------
"John D. Martin" <[email protected]> on 03/06/2001 12:01:35 PM
To: Ben Esty <[email protected]>, Greg Willard <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Andres Almazan <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Murat Binay <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], Murray Carlson
<[email protected]>, [email protected], Kent Daniel
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], Stuart Gillan
<[email protected]>, Denis Gromb <[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Matthias Kahl
<[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], Andras Marosi
<[email protected]>, "John D. Martin" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Beth Miertschin <[email protected]>,
[email protected], "Thomas H. Noe" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Bill Petty <[email protected]>, manju puri
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected] (Ehud I. Ronn), Kemal Saatcioglu
<[email protected]>, Akin Sayrak <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Laura Starks <[email protected]>, [email protected],
"A. Subrahmanyam" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
Beth Miertschin <[email protected]>, "Karin S. Thorburn"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Hello all
Update:
Preparations for the upcoming Texas Finance Festival III are about complete
and I just wanted to update you on the hotel reservations information. You
will need to make your reservation before March 20 to be assured of getting
a room in our reserved block. Also, for "counting" purposes I need
everyone's registration form completed. Many of you (and a lot of new
faces) have already sent them in but some may not have, so . . .
Lots of fun stuff is planned so come prepared for a very relaxing and
productive weekend!
John
- announcerev.doc
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
[email protected]
web: http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Gentlemen -
Following the Dabhol dictate that "bad news is good news," Dabhol is getting some good news this week.
As reported in the press, DPC did receive a two-page letter from MSEB purporting to rescind the PPA with immediate effect because DPC materially misrepresented the capabilities of the power plant (i.e., 6 hour actual ramp-up time vs. 3 hour ramp-up schedule in the PPA). However, the letter goes on to state that MSEB is "agreeable to continue the present arrangement of power and payment until disputes are resolved by the appropriate forum." We are not entirely sure what this last part means and are asking MSEB for clarification. Obviously, this letter is quite a buttress to our already-delivered PTN contending that MSEB has evidenced an intention not to be bound by the PPA.
While MSEB's letter seems to state that they will still honor some aspects of the PPA, the letter adds that "payments would be subject to adjustments on the basis of determination of reasonable compensation and quantum meruit by a competent authority." We hear rumors that MSEB will approach the Maharasthra Energy Regulatory Commission (MERC) for a "how much should we pay DPC" determination. If they do so and MERC accepts jurisdiction, this would help our expropriation, political force majeure and default arguments.
DPC seems to have managed to avoid a construction contractor termination in May by agreeing to extend the required completion date for Block B by 9 days. While this action does not have long-term benefits to the project, I believe that it was a considerable sign of good faith that DPC is trying to give the lenders some time to assess whether they want to begin curing project agreement defaults on an ongoing basis.
Bruce | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here you go Cynthia. I feel pretty confident that everything is correct this
month. However, I'm sure I'm being overly optimistic on that front so call
or email me with any changes. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The contract administrator at Ameren Energy Inc., as agent (for and on hehalf
of Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren UE, Ameren Energy Marketing Company,
and Ameren Energy Generating Company), has indicated that Ameren Services
Company will continue to be the agent for all transmission deals. Please
choose
AMEREN ENERGY INC AS AGENT FOR POWER TRADES
and AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY FOR TRANSMISSION.
If you do not want to be on this distribution list, please reply and your
name will be removed.
Thank you. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hey, Mom.
I got your e-mail just fine. Is your computer fixed up now?
Cole had a great time at his birthday party last night. When we were walking
out of Chuck E Cheese after the party, Cole asked me "Daddy, am I three
now?" He got some good presents and got to play alot of games. It took him
forever to go to sleep. He really loved the Blues Clues game ya'll got him.
The packaging was coming open when he got it yesterday, so Tonya let him open
it before the party. He played it in the car going to the party and on the
way home. I think I'm tired of that game. He can't play it in the car
anymore. It so funny to watch him play though. He will repeat the question
and go "hmm". Anyway I need to go.
D
"PAMELA FARMER" <[email protected]> on 01/12/2001 02:36:37 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: New computer
Hey! Just checking out the new machine. I sent Cole's birthday present
today. Hope he gets it on time. Let me know if you get this message please. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The events described below represent what has happened today. The situation
is in constant flux. However, we need to know our position in case any of the
bellow does occurred.
Scott Baugh, Republican Assembly Leader, had a press conference in which the
republicans declared that:
They accept Duque's Decision as is.
They are going to, request a special legislative session starting September 1
The legislative session is going to look into supplementing focusing on
granting the Governor emergency power for supply side issues and streamlining
sitting. Furthermore, they will propose to provide relief in addition to
Duque's decision, by providing an extra $300 MM, retroactive to June 1,
2000, to schools, hospitals and local government in the form of a tax credit
or cut and from the general fund.
They do not support the Davis/Alpert Bill (SDG&E Rate Freeze). (However, the
San Diego Republicans will probably vote for it).
This also seems to take some wind out of the Pescetti bill (Freeze Extension).
This seems to be a political play. We do not believe that the republicans
think that the Governor will actually declare a special session. The Alpert
bill will most likely be heard tomorrow. We do not know in which form and
whether or not it will be amended.
There also is a current rumor that a new bill may be introduce that would put
the Wood Draft Decision into a bill. Our comments on the Wood decision focus
mostly on the recovery mechanism, limiting the application of the cap to
bundled customerrs, and insuring that only those that benefited from the cap
paid for the costs associated with the cap.
Attached is a brief summary of Woods proposal.
caps the energy component of bills for residential, small commercial and
street lighting customers at 6.5 cents/kwh
creates a balancing account to ensure that SDG&E is "made whole"
uses all revenues generated by SDG&E-owned or managed assets (e.g. qualifying
facilities, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, bilateral and interutility
contracts) to finance the cap (large customers likely to feel cheated by this
provision)
offers large customers a voluntary "bill smoothing" option (but no caps)
states that purchases made by SDG&E from the PX are no longer per se
reasonable and indicates that the Commission will investigate SDG&E,s past
procurement practices (seems to counter previous promises of keeping SDG&E
&whole8)
goes through December 2003
Please provide comments as to our position on Wood's proposal | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 11:46 AM -----
Ben F Jacoby
Sent by: Ben Jacoby
08/03/2000 03:25 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Environmental Permits Matrix
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000 03:22 PM
---------------------------
Dave Kellermeyer
08/03/2000 03:18 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Moore/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Debbie
Chance/Corp/Enron, Gregory Krause/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Environmental Permits Matrix
Attached is a generic spreadsheet that lists environmental activities and
approvals for power projects. I have divided it into three different sheets
that represent: 1) activities/permits required prior to construction, 2)
activities/permits after start of construction and prior to commercial
operation, and 3) activities/permits after start of commercial operation.
I see it being a worthwhile effort to produce a separate list for each
project, including schedule milestones and responsible parties. Whether each
list is generated by me, an environmental consultant, legal counsel, the
developer, etc. is something we should decide on a project by project basis.
I would appreciate your comments on this.
By the way, I don't consider this generic spreadsheet to contain an
exhaustive list of possible permits. There are a number of other potential
approvals, such as occupancy permit, driveway permit, environmental resource
permit, etc. that aren't on this spreadsheet. We really need to assess each
project individually.
Dave | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Looks like they have a rats nest to figure out.
ckm
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 04:41
PM ---------------------------
"Thompson, Peter J." <[email protected]> on 11/13/2000 04:13:35 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Pipitone, Paul"
<[email protected]>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <[email protected]>, "Pipitone, Paul"
<[email protected]>, "Cobb, Christopher" <[email protected]>
Subject: GE Agreement Redline
I just opened the redline that I just forwarded to you all. I
apologize, but it is still wrong. The language I added shows up as a
strike-through and ther language I deleted shows up as though added. I
am desperately atempting to get this straightened out. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is another one...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 11:13 AM
---------------------------
[email protected] on 04/11/2001 10:51:33 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Accounting Director positions: Robert (Bob) Mickits; Big 5 Energy
services
Sally,
This is the second of the two emails I am sending you. ?
Please review the resume of Robert (Bob) Mickits. ?He is currently a
consultant with a Big 5 firm, loaded with GAS Energy experience. ?His
qualifications are:
* ????CPA; BBA - Accounting
* ????E&Y
* ????16 years progressive Accounting/Finance experience and responsibilities
* ????Developed a business process risk model identifying process
characteristics, business risks and associated best practices for the energy
trading and marketing industry.
* ????Experienced and responsible for front, middle and back office
accounting, risk management for energy trading and marketing firms.
* ????Directed all accounting policies & procedures, commodity and
derivative
accounting, reviewed and provided analysis on 133 accounting issues.
* ????Provided clients with infrastructure review and audits for global
trading operations.
* ????Excellent communication skills.
Thanks,
Mike
E. Michael Spartalis, CPA, CPC
ML&R Personnel Solutions
281-782-3411 (Cell) ??
[email protected] (temp)
- Mickits_Robert_0401_rev.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI
Metropolitan Desk; Section B
Metro Business
Internet Utility Plans Move to Westchester
By Joseph P. Fried
09/21/2000
The New York Times
Page 11, Column 5
c. 2000 New York Times Company
The New Power Company, an Internet utility, is planning to establish its
headquarters in
Purchase, N.Y., state and Westchester County officials said yesterday.
New Power was formed in May by the Houston energy giant Enron to work with
America
Online and I.B.M. to sell electricity and natural gas to homes and small
businesses over
the Internet. It has been temporarily located in Greenwich, Conn.
In return for its commitment to create 400 new jobs at its future
headquarters and invest $7
million in renovating and outfitting 80,000 square feet at a Purchase
office complex, New
Power is eligible to apply for hundreds of thousands of dollars in energy
discounts and tax
exemptions from state and county agencies. Joseph P. Fried (NYT)
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Business; Financial Desk
Markets Drillers Seek New Natural Gas Sites
09/21/2000
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
Page C-4
Copyright 2000 / The Times Mirror Company
Natural gas drillers are turning up the heat on Uncle Sam to open up more
areas for
exploration, amid the highest gas prices ever.
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. said Wednesday it plans to start drilling for
natural gas in two
parts of the Arctic by early 2002, in hopes that a gas pipeline to the
Lower 48 states will be
built by 2008.
The company last month bought the right to explore 176,000 acres in the
MacKenzie Delta
of the Canadian Arctic. It will begin seismic shooting, which maps the
geology of potential
drilling sites, this winter in both the Delta and Alaska's North Slope,
said John Seitz,
president and chief operating officer.
Natural gas prices in the last decade haven't been high enough to justify
the expense of
building a gas pipeline from Alaska, major oil companies have said.
But with prices having doubled this year, interest in building a line has
been renewed.
Gas futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange fell 4.5 cents to $5.318
per million
British thermal units Wednesday, down just slightly from Tuesday's record.
"The country needs gas from the Arctic," Seitz said, speaking at the Dain
Rauscher
Wessels oil and gas conference in Houston.
About a dozen companies have pipeline proposals on the table, Seitz said.
He estimated
that at least one route could be built by 2008. Some estimates are for as
early at 2005, he
said.
Drilling on both Anadarko's MacKenzie and North Slope properties could
begin in December
2001 or January 2002, Seitz said.
But chances for construction of a gas pipeline could be threatened if the
government
intervenes to push down prices, experts say.
"We've got an election year, so anything's up for grabs," said Lisa
Stewart, executive vice
president of business development for oil and gas explorer Apache Corp.
Another energy giant, gas producer and energy trader Enron Corp., also
warned against
government intervention.
"Markets do correct, and this market also will correct," Enron CEO Kenneth
Lay said at
the Governors' Natural Gas Summit in Columbus, Ohio. "As long as the
regulators will leave
it alone . . . this market will come back into balance in the next two or
three years."
Without government interference, Apache thinks prices will remain appealing
enough to
spur new drilling. Stewart noted that gas inventories are low nationwide
and demand is
expected to boom.
The government will probably move or be pressured to open up lands now off
limits to
explorers, rather than impose price controls, Seitz said. California and
the Rocky
Mountains are ripe for exploration, he said. "The solution for the prices
is more supply, and
we need to have more land to explore and exploit," he said.
Shares of both Anadarko and Apache rose Wednesday, even as many other
energy stocks
fell. Anadarko (ticker symbol: APC) gained 95 cents to $64; Apache rose 19
cents to
$62.69. Both trade on the New York Stock Exchange.
Enron (ENE), one of the hottest energy stocks, fell $2.69 to $82.17 on the
New York Stock
Exchange.
(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX / INFOGRAPHIC)
Gas Stocks on Fire
Shares of gas and oil exploration and production companies Anadarko
Petroleum (ticker
symbol: APC) and Apache Corp. (APA) have rocketed this year as gas and oil
prices have
soared.
*
Monthly closes and latest for Anadarko and Apache on the New York Stock
Exchange
Anadarko
Wednesday: $64.00, up 95 cents
*
Apache
Wednesday: $62.69, up 19 cents
Source: Bloomberg News
GRAPHIC: Gas Stocks on Fire, Los Angeles Times;
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Enron's CEO Lay: Don't Overreact To Natural Gas Prices
09/21/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
(This article was originally published Wednesday)
HOUSTON -(Dow Jones)- The competitive natural gas market can deliver reliable
service and help consumers
reduce exposure to rising gas prices, Enron Corp. (ENE) chairman and chief
executive officer Kenneth Lay said
Wednesday in Ohio.
Using a number of slide graphics, Lay spoke at Wednesday's natural gas summit
in Columbus, Ohio, convened by
Alaska Gov. Tony Knowles and Ohio Gov. Bob Taft.
Lay warned against overreacting to the recent run-up in prices and urged
officials to encourage utilities to take
advantage of price hedging opportunities to protect consumers against price
volatility.
Lay said the Nymex natural gas futures board shows gas prices, although at a
peak $5.495 per million British
thermal units, declining to $3.345/MMBtu by September 2003.
"The gas resource base remains robust and today's prices will self-correct
over time," Lay said. Overall, he said, the
market has delivered more than $174 billion in savings to consumers since the
market opened to competition in
1984.
Lay said those utilities that haven't protected their customers against
rising prices this winter will pay less per unit
of gas than they did in the early 1980s.
The Enron chairman, a close friend of Republican Texas Gov. George W. Bush,
also urged government officials to
consider lifting access restrictions to develop new gas supplies to meet
growing electricity generation demand from
the growing digital economy.
Federal statutes restrict production drilling in the U.S. Eastern Seaboard,
the Gulf Coast of Florida and California,
and the Rockies, Lay said..
About 400 people attended the one-day conference Wednesday, sponsored by the
Interstate Oil and Gas Compact
Commission (IOGCC).
Also offering presentations were Dr. Fausto Alzati Araiza, Mexican
President-Elect Vicente Fox's energy advisor
and Nick Schultz, vice president of regulatory and transportation policy for
the Canadian Association of Petroleum
Producers.
Daniel Yergin, chairman of Cambridge Energy Research Associates, also urged a
"continent-wide" response by
industry and government to address the current natural gas price shock and
meet long-term energy needs.
The price shock means most U.S. utilities anticipate an increase of between
20%-40% in residential heating bills
this winter while industrial customers will be hit even harder - as much as
50%-100% increases in energy costs,
Yergin said. -By John Edmiston, Dow Jones Newswires, 713-547-9209;
[email protected]
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Report on Business: Technology At Work
Web consultants feel dot-com pain Failure of many Internet startups causes
plunge in consulting revenue
DOUGLAS A. BLACKMON AND ANN CARRNS
Wall Street Journal
09/21/2000
The Globe and Mail
Metro
T6
All material copyright Thomson Canada Limited or its licensors. All rights
reserved.
A big dose of reality is sinking in for the Web's professional gurus.
After months of defying the gravitational pull of imploding dot-coms,
revenues are plunging at some Internet
consulting firms as big companies shift their investment strategies for Web
technology. Investors have reacted by
letting the air out of a slew of once high-flying stocks.
One of the fastest-growing consultancies, iXL Enterprises Inc., announced the
layoff of 350 workers less than a
week after the resignation of its president and an announcement that revenue
in the current quarter will be as much
as 20 per cent lower than expected.
Meanwhile, there were signs that an earlier generation of consulting firms
was trying to move in for the kill, mounting
raids to steal talented young Web experts from the battered firms. Deloitte
Consulting was the most brazen, taking
out a full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal urging employees of Web firms
to jump ship.
The extent and precise nature of the Web consulting fallout isn't clear. iXL,
Viant Corp. and Xpedior Inc., each of
which have issued warnings of lower-than-anticipated third-quarter revenues,
maintain that large firms are slowing
spending as they feel less pressure from Internet start-ups.
"In June and July, the global 1,000 companies started looking around and
saying, 'Holy Cow, these dot-coms aren't
around anymore, nipping at my heels . . . I'm going to take more time to make
these decisions,' " said William
Nussey in an interview after he resigned as president of iXL.
But senior executives at major corporations say that while the climate and
pace may have changed, they are still
investing heavily in the Internet.
Bank of America, for instance, announced in July that it plans to spend
$70-million (U.S.) on electronic commerce
initiatives over the coming six months.
Kevin Koertje, marketing director at Boise Cascade Corp.'s office-products
unit, which generates hundreds of
millions in on-line sales, said the company "is pouring a tonne more money"
into Web systems.
But much of that is going to older firms with expertise in legacy computer
systems, such as KPMG Consulting, and
to narrowly specialized technology experts.
Indeed, the biggest shift in Web consulting may be simply that some customers
are no longer convinced they want
outside help in developing on-line strategies. Xpedior, for instance, said
Sears Roebuck & Co., which is building up
its in-house Web expertise, has reduced its use of the consulting firm's
services this year.
Analysts say investors must differentiate between firms with true strategic
expertise to sell and those that are
merely proficient at setting up Web sites.
Mayank Tandon, an analyst with Janney Montgomery Scott, said firms with true
"intellectual capital" will be the
ones to succeed, citing Chicago consultant Diamond Technology Partners Inc.,
which works closely with Goldman
Sachs Group Inc. and Enron Corp.
Raul Fernandez, chief executive officer of Proxicom Inc. of Reston, Va., said
his firm is on track to meet revenue
projections.
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Colorado Utility Plans to Build a Power Plant Near Colorado Springs
Rich Laden
09/21/2000
KRTBN Knight-Ridder Tribune Business News: The Gazette - Colorado Springs,
Colorado
Copyright (C) 2000 KRTBN Knight Ridder Tribune Business News; Source: World
Reporter (TM)
An arm of energy giant Enron Corp. will build a $100 million power plant
south of Colorado Springs to sell electricity
to the former Public Service Co. of Colorado, which wants to add generating
capacity around the state.
The plant, to consist of four natural gas-powered turbines generating 215
megawatts, will be built near an existing
electric substation, west of Interstate 25 and about six miles south of
Colorado Springs Utilities' Ray Nixon Power
Plant.
Denver-based Xcel Energy Inc., formerly Public Service, serves Denver,
northern Colorado and other areas outside of
Colorado Springs. It plans to spend $1.55 billioncq to upgrade its
power-generation and transmission capacity
around the state. The goal is to have enough new power for 1.6 million
households beyond the 2.5 million customers
Xcel Energy now serves.
Earlier this year, Xcel sought proposals from companies interested in meeting
its projected power needs. Enron
North America Corp., a subsidiary of Houston-based Enron, an electric, gas
and communications powerhouse, was
one of nine successful bidders responding to Xcel's request for proposals.
Those nine bidders will help supply about
1,500 megawatts of generating capacity around Colorado.
Another successful bidder, Wilexco Inc. of Englewood, also was chosen by
Xcel, and plans to build an 83-megawatt
plant south of the planned Enron facility at a cost of more than $90 million.
It will burn tires to generate its power
although the facility still needs to clear various local and state regulatory
hurdles.
Enron should complete its facility by June, said Eric Thode, director of
public relations for Enron North America
Corp. Wilexco's plant is targeted for operation by 2003, said company owner
Brian Wilde.
Xcel spokeswoman Jessica Anderson said her company has a 10-year deal with
Enron to buy power. Wilde said
his deal with Xcel is for 15 years.
"The people who live and work here in Colorado need this additional
generation," Anderson said.
At the end of those initial contracts, Enron and Wilexco could sell power to
other users. The opportunity for such
deals might be enhanced if Colorado deregulates its electric industry and
opens it up to competition.
Until now, state lawmakers have rejected deregulation efforts. Still,
Anderson said, the addition of the power plants
helps position the state for the time when deregulation takes place. Xcel, as
Public Service, supported deregulation
legislation in the General Assembly.
Wilde, of Wilexco, said selling electricity in a deregulated market wasn't
the reason his firm sought to build its plant
because he doesn't know what the electric industry will be like in 15 years.
Thode echoed that sentiment, saying, "This plant is being built for the deal
as it currently exists. This deal makes
sense because this deal makes sense, period."
Colorado Springs Utilities also is adding generating capacity.
Two 30-megawatt, gas-fired turbines have been added to the Nixon Plant, which
burns coal to generate its power.
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Houston Chronicle
Thursday, September 21
Business Briefs
Koch forms unit to trade bandwidth
WICHITA, Kan. -- Closely held Koch Industries, one
of the
world's largest energy traders, said it has formed
a unit to trade
bandwidth, or spare capacity on fiber-optic
cables.
Koch Global Bandwidth Services will be led by Bill
Mohl, who
has held several senior management jobs at Koch
for the past five
years. He also was vice president at Altra Energy
Technologies.
The unit will be based in Houston.
Koch Industries, based in Wichita, joins companies
such as
Houston-based Enron Corp. and Tulsa-based Williams
Cos. that
have diversified into trading bandwidth from their
pipeline
business.
Enron plans to spend as much as $1.95 billion over
the next two
to three years to expand its fiber-optic network
and
broadband-trading operations, Chief Executive Ken
Lay said
Wednesday in Houston.
USA: Profit-taking hits Enron stock.
09/20/2000
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2000.
HOUSTON, Sept 20 (Reuters) - Energy marketer Enron Corp. saw its stock fall
sharply for a second day
Wednesday, a move analysts attributed to profit-taking after a strong run for
the shares since early July.
Enron closed $2-11/16 lower at $82-3/16 on the New York Stock Exchange
Wednesday after losing $5-9/16
Tuesday, making a total decline of slightly more than 9 percent over both
days.
Analysts noted the decline followed a strong performance by the stock, which
broke above a mid-$60s to mid-$70s
trading range in August to hit a 52-week high of $90-9/16 on Aug. 23, more
than doubling its end-1999 value of
$44-6/16.
"Inevitably you are going to get some profit-taking as we get near the end of
the quarter and people want to lock in
some of their profits," said Merrill Lynch analyst Donato Eassey.
Ed Tirello of Deutsche Banc Alex Brown said the decline was due in part to
investors viewing Enron as a
technology play, because of its online trading and broadband businesses.
Consequently Enron's stock was susceptible to weakness in the tech-heavy
Nasdaq market this month, which
appeared to have triggered selling by momentum investors, Tirello said.
Merrill Lynch's Eassey said Enron's stock might also have been hurt by an
article in the weekly Texas supplement
to the Wall Street Journal, which called into question the trading profits
reported by Enron and other big energy
marketers.
Eassey dismissed the article as "misleading" and said he retained a Buy
rating on Enron's stock with a 12
month-price target of $95.
"This is a stock that you've got to have in your core portfolio. Enron is
still one of the premier companies that you
can own in all of the market," he said.
However, investing in Enron was not without risks and amounted to betting on
the company's ability to execute
successfully on new technology opportunities, he added.
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
01.01.01 heralds the actual millenium. A unique date to be repeated only
after 1000 years !
?
?
Here's hoping that the millenium showers health, wealth & hapiness in all
extremes on you & your family & makes the world a great place to live.
?
?
best regards,
?
?
MUKUL-JAYSHREE | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
"Sacramento or Salem?" Sort of has a nice ring to it. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
461026
461027
jeff
broker has 75 mw | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
?
? 'VentureWire'
Monday, December 04, 2000 ?
? CONTENTS | COMPANIES | INVESTORS ?
?
top stories
* Online Broker Datek Gets $700 Million, Will Spin Off Island
* Online Marketing Firm iChoose Shuts Down
* Quova Names Ex-Telocity Exec President & CEO, Adds to Board
* Web Security Firm @Stake Gets $26 Million in Second Round
Optix 2001 Features Creme de la Creme of the Industry
Ask yourself: if Patrick Nettles, Chairman and CEO of Ciena,
and Kerry Vahala, Professor of Applied Physics at the
California Institute of Technology, are speaking at Optix
2001, shouldn't I register to attend? It's been labeled the
"must-attend" event of the year and is certain to be the
optimal chance for networking with key players in the industry.
In addition, 48 CEOs representing the best and brightest
private optical communications companies will expound their
business plans and future goals to others in the industry.
Participation at this event is subject to approval and is
limited to senior executives involved in the optical com-
munications industry. For your registration pack, link
to:http://www.optix2001.com/
new money
* Net Security Firm Mazu Gets $8 Million Series A, New CEO
* Commerce Software Firm Momenta Gets $5 Million Round One
* Mobile Commerce Firm ViaFone Gets $23 Million in Round Two
* B2B Content Portal Hetairia Gets $250,000 in Additional Seed
* Warner Music Group to Take Stake in Echo Networks
bad news
* Walker Digital May Have Violated Labor Rules in Layoffs
* B2B Tech and Support Firm NetSales Cuts 40% of Staff
* Reward Program Stockback.com Lays Off 50% of Staff
new products
* Speed Ventures and Sonera Launch Idea Tester BreedLab
m&a
* Aggregration Firms Yodlee and VerticalOne Merge
* E-Learning Firm Wide Learning Acquires Financial Directions
* Procurement Firm Simplexis Acquires Bid Tech Firm NISBIC
* GeoAccess Acquires Sweetwater Health from Bankrupt Caredata
new directors
* Medical App Firm ClinicManager Names New Board Member
new people
* Workforce ASP Interactive Software Systems Names President
vw corrections
* Allegis Capital
* Internet Publishing Group
TOP STORIES... NEW MONEY... BAD NEWS... NEW PRODUCTS... M&A... NEW
DIRECTORS... NEW PEOPLE... VW CORRECTIONS
? ? ? VentureFinance:The private equity authority.? ? Every month VentureFinance tells you where venture? capitalists are investing and why, which has made it? a must read for angels, fund managers, investment bankers,? general partners, and specialists in buyouts and business? development. From Technologic Partners, following private? investments since 1985.http://technologicpartners.com/tp/vf/? ? ? top stories? ?? Online Broker Datek Gets $700 Million, Will Spin Off Island?
ISELIN, N.J. (VENTUREWIRE) -- Datek Online Holdings, an Internet securities
broker, said that a group of investors led by Bain Capital and including TA
Associates and Silver Lake Partners have bought a $700 million majority stake
in the company. Datek will acquire all voting shares of its original
shareholders, including former CEO Jeffrey Citron. As part of the deal, the
investors will spin off Island ECN, an off-market network for trading
securities, as a separate company. Datek will own 10% of Island. Island's
board of directors will consist of current management and members of the
investment group. Datek previously received backing from Group Arnault of
France, TA Associates, and Vulcan Ventures.
http://www.datek.com
http://www.island.com
Online Marketing Firm iChoose Shuts Down
? ? DALLAS (VENTUREWIRE) -- iChoose, a developer of e-commerce marketing systems, ?said it has shut down due to lack of funding. In the past couple of months, ?the company has struggled to stay alive by seeking out additional funding, ?and even signed a letter of intent to be acquired. That acquisition fell ?through and the company said it had no other choice than to close. iChoose ?was unable to disclose the would-be-acquirer due to legal restrictions. On ?its Web site, the company posted a message with uninstall instructions for ?its software and a final farewell to its customers. iChoose was backed by ?Sevin Rosen. ? http://www.ichoose.com? ? Quova Names Ex-Telocity Exec President & CEO, Adds to Board?
REDWOOD CITY, Calif. (VENTUREWIRE) -- Quova, which provides businesses with
Internet infrastructure intelligence services, said it appointed Marie
Alexander as its new president and CEO. Ms. Alexander previously served as
the vice president of strategic relationships at residential DSL firm
Telocity. Quova also said that Emerick Woods, president and CEO of Vicinity,
will join Quova's board of directors. Backers for Quova include Softbank
Technology Ventures, IDG Ventures, Nexus Group, Fidelity Investments, and
Schoffstall Ventures.
http://www.quova.com
Web Security Firm @Stake Gets $26 Million in Second Round
? ? CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (VENTUREWIRE) -- @stake, a provider of Internet security ?services, said it raised $26 million in its second round of funding. ?Investors included Madison Dearborn Partners and previous investor Battery ?Ventures. Individual investors in the round included Bruce Claflin, president ?and COO of 3Com; Paul Sagan, president of Akamai Technologies; William ?Cadogan, chairman, president, and CEO of ADC Telecom; Bob Palmer, former ?chairman, president and CEO of Digital Equipment; Eckard Pfieffer, chairman ?of Intershop and former CEO of Compaq Computer; Morgan O'Brien, co-founder of ?Nextel Communications; and Robert J. Davis, CEO of Terra-Lycos. The company ?will use the funding toward research and new marketing programs. ? http://www.atstake.com? ? new money? ?? Net Security Firm Mazu Gets $8 Million Series A, New CEO?
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (VENTUREWIRE) -- Mazu Networks, which provides Internet
security technology, said it has secured $8 million in its Series A round of
funding from Greylock Partners, Matrix Partners, and Benchmark Capital. As a
result of the investment, David Arnoff of Greylock and Andy Marcuvitz of
Matrix will join Mazu's board of directors. The company also said that Phil
London, who has served in senior executive positions at Lotus Development
Corp, Trilogy Software and Agillion, has joined Mazu as its new chief
executive officer.
http://www.mazunetworks.com
Commerce Software Firm Momenta Gets $5 Million Round One
? ? AUSTIN, Texas (VENTUREWIRE) -- Momenta, a software company providing ?collaborative commerce applications and services for electonic marketplaces, ?said it has raised $5 million in its first round of funding. Authosisa, a ?Hong Kong-based venture capital firm, led the round, which also included ?American Pacific Technology Group and several individual Asian and American ?investors. The company said it will use the funds for marketing and product ?development.? http://www.momenta.com? ? Mobile Commerce Firm ViaFone Gets $23 Million in Round Two?
REDWOOD SHORES, Calif. (VENTUREWIRE) -- ViaFone, which enables consumers to
purchase items via the Internet from any wireless device, said it secured $23
million in its second round of funding, led by Redpoint Ventures. RRE
Ventures participated along with previous investors Draper Fisher Jurvetson
and Partech International. The company will use the funds to launch its
OneBridge Mobility Platform internationally. RRE Ventures co-founder and
general partner Jim Robinson III, and Redpoint Ventures partner Peter Gotcher
joined the company's board of directors.
http://www.viafone.com
B2B Content Portal Hetairia Gets $250,000 in Additional Seed
? ? DALLAS (VENTUREWIRE) -- Hetairia Communications, which is developing a ?business-to-business content portal at www.fastcamel.com, said it has raised ?an additional $250,000 in seed financing from Doug Duncan, a general partner ?at BarleyMills Investment, adding to Mr. Duncan's previous investment of ?$250,000. The company said it will use the funds to form a partnership with ?industry magazines, to make site content available in several languages, and ?to expand customer service and sales. Doug Duncan sits on the board of ?Hetairia Communications along with Michael Cowpland, CEO of Corel, a graphic ?arts and word processing applications firm. ? http://www.fastcamel.com? ? Warner Music Group to Take Stake in Echo Networks?
SAN FRANCISCO (VENTUREWIRE) -- Echo Networks, which provides interactive
streaming music, said it has entered into an agreement with Warner Music
Group (WMG) that permits Echo to include WMG-controlled recordings in its
community-based streaming music service. As part of the agreement, WMG will
have the right to acquire a small equity stake in Echo, which is backed by
eBay co-founder, Jeff Skoll; former president of Disney's Hollywood Records,
Peter Paterno; and Wish.com CEO Michael Mo. The company has also secured
funding from Revolution Ventures and Fundamental Capital.
http://www.echo.com
bad news
?
Walker Digital May Have Violated Labor Rules in Layoffs
? ? NEW YORK (VENTUREWIRE) -- Walker Digital, the investment and incubation firm ?run by Jay Walker, the founder of priceline.com, may have violated a federal ?law after it laid off about a hundred employees the week of Thanksgiving. ?Since the U.S. Department of Labor enacted the Worker Adjustment and ?Retraining Notification Act (WARN), a company that is laying off more than ?33% of its active work force in a 30-day period must give workers 60 days ?notice. If workers do not get the proper notice, they are entitled to 60 days ?pay and benefits. According to one former Walker Digital employee, all laid ?off employees received one week of health insurance and no severance pay. ?There are several exceptions to the Labor rules, and the Connecticut Attorney ?General is reportedly investigating the situation. Walker Digital ?spokesperson Kevin Goldman would not comment directly on severance offered to ?its former employ! ess. He said on Friday Walker Digital had not been ?contacted by the state attorney general office and would be happy to ?cooperate if contacted.? http://www.walkerdigital.com? ? B2B Tech and Support Firm NetSales Cuts 40% of Staff?
OVERLAND PARK, Kan. (VENTUREWIRE) -- NetSales, which provides industrial
suppliers with technology and support services for online product sales, said
it cut 63 positions in every department, leaving the company with
approximately 100 employees. The company said it is focusing more on supplier
integration and that the layoffs were a result of the company's incorrect
estimation of the number of staff it needed. Over the summer, the company
sold its online software sales division, eliminating 70 jobs, as part of its
shift from a business-to-consumer focus to a business-to-business market.
NetSales received $31.75 million in March from Norwest Equity Partners, Time
Warner, Chase Manhattan, Wells Fargo, Advanta Partners, HarbourVest Partners,
and Kansas City Equity Partners.
http://www.netsales.com
Reward Program Stockback.com Lays Off 50% of Staff
? ? NEW YORK (VENTUREWIRE) -- Stockback.com, a Web site that rewards consumers ?who use partner sites by putting their money into savings programs such as ?mutual funds, said it laid off almost 50% of its 66-member staff. The company ?said it let go of 29 employees, mostly in the information technology ?division. That division will be restructured to tie technology spending to ?revenue streams. The company also said it will be able to operate without any ?additional money until the first quarter of 2002. Despite the cutbacks, the ?company said it will make "strategic hires." Stockback is funded by RRE ?Ventures, Neo Carta Ventures, and TH Lee.Putnam Internet Partners.? http://www.stockback.com? ? new products? ?? Speed Ventures and Sonera Launch Idea Tester BreedLab ?
AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands (VENTUREWIRE) -- Speed Ventures, an international
venture management company, and Sonera, a Finnish mobile communications and
services and applications provider, said it has formed BreedLab, which will
focus on developing and testing new business ideas. Potential entrepreneurs
joining the BreedLab program will get the services free of charge, but when
the decision is made to start the business, Sonera and Speed Ventures, will
take up a shareholding position in the company.
http://www.sonera.com/breedlab
m&a
?
Aggregration Firms Yodlee and VerticalOne Merge
? ? REDWOOD SHORES, Calif. (VENTUREWIRE) -- Yodlee, which provides a free, ?Web-based service that enables users to manage and gain access to personal ?account information, said it merged with VerticalOne, a wholly owned ?subsidiary of online financing services firm S1, a publicly traded Internet ?banking firm. Vertical One provides personal account aggregration and ?transaction services. The new company will be run as a stand alone under the ?Yodlee name and S1 will hold a 32% ownership stake. No further financial ?details were disclosed. Anil Arora, president and CEO of Yodlee, will be the ?CEO of the new company and Gregg Freishtat, VerticalOne's founder, chairman ?and CEO, will serve as an advisor to senior management. Yodlee is funded by ?Accel Partners and Sequoia Capital.? http://www.verticalone.com? http://www.yodlee.com? E-Learning Firm Wide Learning Acquires Financial Directions?
LONDON (VENTUREWIRE) -- Wide Learning, a suppler of financial Internet
learning services for employees and customers of financial institutions, said
it acquired Financial Directions (FDI), a supplier of classroom-based
financial training for banks, brokers, and financial institutions. The terms
of the deal were not disclosed. Wide Learning is backed by GE Capital, JP
Morgan, Arts Alliance, and Forman Hardy Holdings.
http://www.financialdirectionsinc.com
http://www.widelearning.com
Procurement Firm Simplexis Acquires Bid Tech Firm NISBIC
? ? SAN FRANCISCO (VENTUREWIRE) -- Simplexis, an online educational service ?provider focusing on K-12 schools and their suppliers, said it acquired the ?National Internet School Bid Information Center, a provider of bid technology ?for schools. Financial terms were undisclosed. Simplexis will integrate ?NISBIC's technology into its own product SimpleBuy, an Internet procurement ?technology for schools and school suppliers. Derek MacFarland, NISBIC's ?founder and CEO, will remain with the company as head of the sealed bid ?department. Simplexis is backed by ICG, Kaplan, GE Capital, Commerce One, and ?individual investor Lamar Alexander, former secretary of education.? http://www.simplexis.com? ? GeoAccess Acquires Sweetwater Health from Bankrupt Caredata?
OVERLAND PARK, Kan. (VENTUREWIRE) -- GeoAccess, a developer of an Internet
physician search engine and managed care software, said it signed an
agreement to acquire Sweetwater Health Enterprises from Caredata.com, which
was recently pulled from the Nasdaq and has filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy,
for an undisclosed amount. GeoAccess will retain some senior managers from
Sweetwater, but has not yet decided about whether it will taken on other
Caredata employees. Sweetwater provides medical credential services,
software, and Internet tools to managed care organizations, hospitals, and
other healthcare entities. GeoAccess will acquire several products and
services including PrimeSource and PrimeSourceWeb physician credential
services. GeoAccess is backed by undisclosed investors including individuals
http://www.geoaccess.com
new directors
?
Medical App Firm ClinicManager Names New Board Member
? ? SOUTHFIELD, Mich. (VENTUREWIRE) -- ClinicManager, an application service ?provider for the medical community, said it has appointed Frank D. Stella to ?its board of directors. Mr. Stella, who will be the sixth member of the ?board, is the founder, chairman, and CEO of F.D. Stella Products. ?ClinicManager, which is currently raising Series B funding, is backed by ?individual investors. ? http://www.clinicmanager.com? ? new people? ?? Workforce ASP Interactive Software Systems Names President?
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (VENTUREWIRE) -- Interactive Software Systems (ISS), a
provider of contact center, e-commerce, and enterprise and workforce
management services, said it appointed Howard Glass as president. Mr. Glass
has been acting president of the organization since June of this year. Prior
to joining the company, he served as president of IRT, a contact center and
CRM outsourcing provider and parent company of ISS. ISS is backed by IRT and
individual investors.
http://www.intersoftsys.com
vw corrections
?
Allegis Capital
? ? NEW YORK (VENTUREWIRE) -- An item in yesterday's Venture Wire listed an ?incorrect URL for Allegis Capital. The correct URL is ?http://www.allegiscapital.com.? ? Internet Publishing Group?
NEW YORK (VENTUREWIRE) -- An item in yesterday's VentureWire incorrectly
stated the name of the company's new board member. His correct name is Rob
McCord and he will be the fifth board member, not the sixth.
company index
? ? @Stake, BreedLab, ClinicManager, Datek Online Holdings, Echo Networks, ?FastCamel.com, Financial Directions, GeoAccess, iChoose, Interactive Software ?Systems, Mazu Networks, Momenta Inc., NetSales, Quova, Simplexis, Stockback, ?VerticalOne, ViaFone, Walker Digital, Wide Learning, Yodlee.com? ? ? ? Where will you find the world's leaders in the optical? communications industry discussing the latest trends,? developments, and future direction of the field?? Optix2001 Feb 11-14 in Pasadena CA.? ? Be on the cutting edge of optical communications technology? with industry experts and scholars such as Joe Bass, VP and? GM of the Wavelength Routing Business Unit at Cisco Systems,? and John E. Bowers, Professor and Director of the? Multidisciplinary Optical Switching Technology Center at? UC Santa Barbara.? ? Also participating are CEOs from the top 48 optical? communications organizations, providing attendees with an? unparalleled inside look at the companies and players in? this dynamic field.? ? Participation at this event is subject to approval and is? limited to senior executives involved in the optical? communications industry. For your registration pack link ?to:http://www.optix2001.com/? ? ? investor index?
American Pacific Technology Group, Authosisa, Benchmark Capital, Draper
Fisher Jurvetson, Greylock Management, Matrix Partners, Partech
International, Redpoint Ventures, RRE Ventures, Warner Music Group
Encourage your friends and colleagues to subscribe to VentureWire at
http://venturewire.net/register.asp
Send news items to [email protected]
Send questions, complaints, or service queries to [email protected]
To change your e-mail address visit our account administration page at
http://venturewire.net
To unsubscribe send e-mail to [email protected]
This newsletter was mailed to you at: [email protected]
This copy of VentureWire may be distributed freely, provided that the
distribution is without charge, that the issue is distributed complete and
unaltered, and that all copies retain the Technologic copyright notice. This
copy of VentureWire and the information within it, however, may not be
reproduced, saved, or otherwise copied into a database without the prior
written consent of Technologic Partners.
VentureWire is a service mark of Technologic Partners
, 2000 Technologic Partners
? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The following report contains confidential and sensitive information. Please treat with discretion.
Executive Summary:
? FERC price cap decision reflects Bush political and economic objectives. Politically, Bush is determined to let the crisis blame fall on Davis; from an economic perspective, he is unwilling to create disincentives for new power generation
? Davis finds four major flaws with FERC plan, most notably its exclusion of out-of-state generators
? June 1st "kill clause" for FERC order could coincide with new Bush regional plan
? California facing growing fiscal risk following bond downgrade, expected $20 billion power bill this summer--economic crisis would force deeper Administration involvement
? QF bid for advance payments from PG&E likely to fail in bankruptcy court
? New generation delays probable because of State/QF squabbling
? Consumer groups are preparing a constitutional challenge to SoCal bailout deal
1. FERC Fallout
The FERC decision is a holding move by the Bush administration that looks like action, but is not. Rather, it allows the situation in California to continue to develop virtually unabated. The political strategy appears to allow the situation to deteriorate to the point where Davis cannot escape shouldering the blame. Once they are politically inoculated, the Administration can begin to look at regional solutions. Moreover, the Administration has already made explicit (and will certainly restate in the forthcoming Cheney commission report) its opposition to stronger price caps on the grounds that they are unwilling to create disincentives to the construction of new generation.
It is interesting and ironic to note that electricity generators were generally happy with the FERC order and that the only FERC commissioner who favors price caps actually voted against this plan.
2. Something Less than Effective Price Caps
From Davis's point of view, the FERC plan has four major flaws:
? The order applies only to California, not to the rest of the west. Non-California generators are not required to sell at capped rates to California.
? As the order is written, it is more of a price floor for emergency power than a ceiling.
? State officials also believe that energy suppliers will continue to game the system, because the price mitigation scheme only kicks in after a Stage 2 emergency and does not require any collusion.
? Even when the price caps kick in, they are based on the cost-plus for the highest cost producer supplying power to California and do not require wholesalers to abide by the cap. The generators can also charge above the cap, provided they can subsequently justify the excess charge to FERC.
3. Proposal "Kill Clause" Adds to the Political Dilemma for Davis
The FERC proposal includes a "kill clause" that says the caps will be withdrawn unless California's ISO agrees by June 1st to become part of the regional grid now under FERC control. If Davis doesn't sign on to the regional grid by June 1st, then he will have to live with June 2nd headlines blaming him for letting the "Bush price caps plan" collapse.
4. Growing Fiscal Risk in California
Sources speculate that California could therefore pay as much as $20 billion on power this summer - this is more than the combined enterprise value of PG&E and SCE. These sources believe that, because of the severity of the situation, the FERC and/or the federal government will be forced to take further action to control prices for power.
The consensus is that the state of California will run out of money in about 90 days. One of the first projects to be cancelled will be state plans to finance new power plant construction in exchange for long-term power deals. The bleak fiscal picture is also causing bank creditors to revisit the bridge loans they are providing to California.
The Bush Administration and the Fed are only now waking up to the seriousness of the fiscal picture. The country's largest and most prosperous state will have gone from large surpluses to serious debt downgrades and devastating deficits in a matter of months.
5. QFs to Seek Advance Payment from PG&E
Meanwhile, on the bankruptcy front, the QFs reportedly will ask the bankruptcy judge today to give them advance payment from PGE's accounts, since their natural gas vendors have likewise demanded advance payment for gas. It appears very unlikely that the QFs' request will be granted. If the QFs do not receive advance payment, it is likely that most of the 4,000 mw of gas-fired QF capacity will remain offline.
6 Delays Likely in New QF Generation
The QF deals made with the state for long-term contracts are being continually renegotiated, which is likely to mean that the new plants those contracts are supposed to finance will not be online as early as anticipated.
7. Consumer Groups Ready to Challenge Constitutionality of SCE Bailout Plan
Harvey Rosenfield and his colleagues reportedly have been reviewing an analysis of the MOU for the SCE bailout plan. The analysis was done by a utilities analyst, rather than a lawyer, though it appears to raise a number of good legal points. For example, one of the elements of the MOU is a "non-bypassable" charge on ratepayers that would require them to pay even if they disconnect from the grid. This is effectively a tax, since there is no exchange of value for money, which under the CA constitution cannot be used to directly benefit a private entity. This makes the bonds that would be issued are general obligation bonds, rather than revenue bonds. According to the constitution, the state cannot be put into debt to benefit a private company. For this and other reasons, even if the Republicans would vote for the SCE bailout, which remains unlikely, the bailout probably would not stand a likely constitutional challenge.
8. Governor Hurt by Continued Failure to Disclose Long-Term Power Contracts
The issue of the Governor's failure to disclose the details of the long-term power contracts continues to distress the other players in the crisis. Even if he were to disclose everything he and his staff have been negotiating, it is likely that their actions and negotiations will challenged, creating an even further delay. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mollie....
-----Original Appointment-----
From: Gustafson, Mollie On Behalf Of Calger, Christopher F.
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Calger, Christopher F.; Mcdonald, Michael; Lackey, Chris; Woodland, Andrea; Thome, Stephen; Etringer, Michael; Wente, Laura; Shields, Jeff; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Yoder, Christian; Belden, Tim; Crandall, Sean; Scholtes, Diana; Richter, Jeff; Semperger, Cara; Mallory, Chris; Williams, Bill; Thomas, Jake
Subject: Updated: Mtg. to discuss assignment of customers. Transmission list: P/LEGAL/PROJECTNETCO/NETCOTRANSMISSION.XLS
When: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada); Tijuana.
Where: Mt. Hood ( Main ) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
did nt make that cut
-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Parks, Joe; chad knipe; Fenner, Chet; EriK Wollam; Brian Constantine
Subject: RE: duuuuhhhhh
UBS hasn't put you to work yet?!?
-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:58 AM
To: chad knipe; Chet Fenner; EriK Wollam; Brian Constantine
Subject: RE: duuuuhhhhh
bored, would you like to come to work with me
-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Chet Fenner; EriK Wollam; Brian Constantine; Parks, Joe
Subject: duuuuhhhhh
For the love of god, I just can't seem to work or focus on anything these days..........is there anything in season or left to kill??!!! I need holiday/hunting rehab.
I didn't drink last night for the first time in about 3 mos.--maybe thats the problem.
bored.
C.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
[IMAGE]
Wednesday January 9, 2002 [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] RIGZONE [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] home | news | search | maps | data | jobs | market | store [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] In This Issue [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Current Oil and Gas Industry News T! op Stories for the Past 7 Days Featured Events and Conferences What's in Store - Books & More Featured Employment Opportunities Surplus Oilfield Equipment For Sale Worldwide Offshore Rig Utilization Oil & Gas Prices [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Industry Headlines [IMAGE] [IMAGE] BP Scales Back Alaskan Operations BP has decided to downsize its staff in Anchorage and shelve its Liberty project at this time. Collision Near Sleipner B Platform Averted Emergency measures were put into action when two fishing trawlers were seen headed for the unmanned Sleipner B platform. [IMAGE] ! [IMAGE] Exploration [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] ! Ocean Energy Increases Acreage Offshore Angola Ocean Energy acquires 35% interest in Block 10 offshore Angola and will serve as operator. Malaysia, Indonesia & Vietnam Enter Joint Venture The national oil companies of Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam have signed a joint venture agreement to explore for oil offshore Vietnam. Apache Hits Again in Egypt Apache has completed the Khepri Well in Egypt's Western Desert. The well tested at 29.5 million cubic feet of gas and 220 barrels of condensate per day. PGS Takes Interest in Varg Field PGS purchases Norsk Hydro's 42% share in License PL038 in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Production [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] PetroChina and Shell Sign Gas Pipeline Deal PetroChina and Shell have entered into a preliminary agreement for an $18 billion East/West China pipeline project. KNOC To Ink Deal with PetroVietnam KNOC is hoping to sign an agreement with PetroVietnam to receive gas from the Rong Doi field. Jacobs Joins NAM Consortium Jacobs Engineering has been awarded formal approval to become a member of the NAM Consortium. [IMAGE] Company & Financial News [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Kerr-McGee Announces 2002 Capital Budget Kerr-McGee to allocate $310 million of its 2002 exploration and production budget for the North Sea. Northern Offshore Announces Organizational Changes Northern Offshore has moved its corporate offices from Norway to Bermuda. Landmark Opens New Office in Anchorage Landmark Graphics has opened a new technical assistance support office in Anchorage, Alaska. EEX's 2001 Operations Review EEX summarizes its 2001 U.S. and international operations activities. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] advertisement A National-Oilwell designed, 1992 built modular offshore drilling rig is available for sale direct from the manufacturer. This rig drilled only 5 wells from the Draugen platform in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. Click on the link below for full details, photos and seller contact information: http://www.rigzone.com/market/surplus_listing.asp?eq_id=397 Last 7 Days Top Stories [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Halliburton Says the Rumors Are Not True Halliburton says there is no basis for the rumors that the company has filed for bankruptcy. MMS Approves Use of FPSOs In Gulf of Mexico The U.S. Minerals Management Service has approved the use of FPSO vessels in the central and western portions of the Gulf of Mexico. Kvaerner Receives Final Approval for Rescue Plan Kvaerner has received approval from the final group of lenders for the rescue plan that would merge Kvaerner and Aker Maritime. Nabors Changes Corporate Structure Nabors Industries Board of Directors has approved a plan to reorganize the company and change its place of incorporation from Delaware to Bermuda. Prosafe Awarded FPSO Work Offshore Nigeria Prosafe has been awarded an eight-year contract for an FPSO to work on the Abo field offshore Nigeria by a consortium led by Agip. Marathon Acquires Interests in Equatorial Guinea Marathon has completed its acquisition of CMS Energy's interests in Equatorial Guinea for $993 million. FMC Corporation Spins Off FMC Technologies FMC Corporation has distributed all of its remaining shares in FMC Technologies making it a fully independent company. SMOE Awarded North Sea Platform Contract SembCorp has been awarded a contract by Maersk for the installation of a process deck and accommodation module in the North Sea. Marathon Begin! s Trading on NYSE Marathon Oil Corporation has begun trading on the New York Stock Exchange as a standalone company following the separation of Marathon Group and U.S. Steel. Unocal Increases Production Offshore Thailand Unocal Thailand has plans to double the crude output in the Gulf of Thailand this year as part of a six-year development plan. Newfield Makes Management Changes Newfield Exploration has made management changes in Australia and Anadarko Basin office locations. Houston Exploration Completes Acquisition Houston Exploration finalizes South Texas property acquisition from Conoco for $69 million. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upcoming Oil & Gas Industry Events [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Jan. 22 Alliances and Partnering in Oil & Gas Singapore Feb. 6 Torch Mid-Winter Energy Conference New York Feb. 7 Marine Construction 2002 Houston Feb. 10 2002 SPE International Petroleum Co! nference & Exhibition in Mexico Villahermosa Feb. 26 2002 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition Dallas Feb. 27 Human Resources in Oil & Gas Aberdeen Mar. 10 AAPG Annual Meeting Houston Apr. 9 2002 SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition Houston May. 6 Offshore Technology Conference 2002 Houston Aug. 27 ONS 2002 Conference and Exhibition Stavanger list your conference view upcoming events [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] INTEC Horizon Offshore Global Completion Service HoverDril DataLog [IMAGE] [IMAGE] promote your company [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Managing the Offshore Installation Workforce [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Accident Prevention Reference Guide [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Safety and Security at Sea [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] more products [IMAGE] [IMAGE] featured equipment: Nat! ional 1320-UE, National 1320-M and Oilwell 840-E [IMAGE] Dreco 1000 UE Land Rigs [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] more equipment [IMAGE] [IMAGE] featured jobs: - Senior Operations Manager - Contract Manager - Senior Pipeline Engineer more hot jobs >> featured candidates: - Petroleum Engineer - Drilling & Production - Operations Coordinator - Well Rounded Petroleum Engineer search for candidates >> [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Drillships: To 5000': 50.0% (7/14) +5000': 100.0% (25/25) Semisubs: 2nd Gen: 67.1% (49/73) 3rd Gen: 82.0% (41/50) 4th Gen: 100.0% (38/38) 5th Gen: 100.0% (7/7) Jackups: To 200': 56.7% (38/67) 200' MC: 54.2% (13/24) 200' MS: 14.3% (3/21) 300' IC: 87.5% (84/96) +300' IC: 88.9% (48/54) Severe Env.: 81.0% (17/21) [IMAGE] [IMAGE] view complete utilization report [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Light Crude Oil: $20.73/BBL (-3.49%) Brent Crude Oil: $22.00/BBL (0.14%) Natural Gas: $2.29/MMBtu (-29.32%) Unleaded Gasoline: $0.59/gal (3.51%) prices from: 1/8/2002 change since: 1/7/2002 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Promotional Opportunities Become a Sponsor, feature your job opening or, advertise your upcoming industry conference. Click here for more information, send your press release to [email protected] or call us at 281-345-4040. Member Services If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, you may unsubscribe by clicking here or by logging in to Rigzone and updating your profile. You can also change the format you receive (HTML or Text) and your email address by logging in and updating your account. Click here to log in . [IMAGE] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a brief memo I prepared in anticipation of the meeting scheduled
for Wed., May 23rd, to discuss setoff issues. Please call if you have any
questions or comments.
Thanks
Elizabeth
713 853 6349 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Omar:
Here is the final version of the Pastoria Facility.
Ben | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
So you only email me when you want something. No, I do not know what I am
going to do. They tell me Time Warner Cable Modem service is not available
in my area, however, Time Warner tells me it is. They tell me that I can
sign up for DSL and expense it on my expense account until they allow it
sometimes next month. I guess I need to talk with them some more about which
is better. People tell me the cable modem service is actually faster than
the response we currently have in the office. Let me know what you decide to
do, so that I can ponder the reasons for your choice.
Stacy E Dickson
01/11/2001 03:49 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Internet Service
Have you decided what you are going to do?
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001 03:48 PM -----
ClickAtHomePilot2@ENRON
Sent by: Stacey Dempsey@ENRON
01/11/2001 09:38 AM
To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Internet Service
Did you not receive this yesterday? We have launched ISP, to an extent.
The ClickAtHome Project Team@ENRON
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
01/10/2001 03:19 PM
To: ClickAtHome Pilot 1 Confirmed Participants, ClickAtHome Pilot 2
Confirmed Participants
cc: Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Wise/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Whitehurst/NA/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Boudreaux/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacey
Dempsey/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie Newhouse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marsha
Francis/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: ClickAtHome ISP Ordering is Here!
Thank you for your participation in our first two pilots. Your effort, time
spent, feedback, and interest in the program has been very helpful in
improving it. Thank you, too, for your patience through this new process.
We are excited to announce the beginning of Internet Service Ordering today,
Wednesday, January 10. Many of our vendors are ready to begin providing
service to you today, while all vendors will be ready by late February. The
ClickAtHome Internet Service Providers whom are currently available for
internet service are
Time-Warner in Houston, (cable modem)
Kingwood Cable, (cable modem)
AT&T in Portland. (cable modem)
MSN will be available in late February, providing both dial-up and DSL
service. We will provide further communication as soon as MSN orders can be
placed. We appreciate your patience in advance.
To pre-qualify and sign up for service in your area today with Time Warner,
Kingwood or AT&T- Portland, refer to http://clickathomepilot.enron.com for
specific provider information and instructions on how to place your order.
If you have problems launching the site, please copy and paste
http://clickathomepilot.enron.com directly into Internet Explorer.
The ClickAtHome Team is excited to bring you the final stage of the program.
Again, we thank you for your patience. We encourage you and your family to
use and personalize your new portal, which can be found at
www.clickathome.net. And we encourage you to get connected, and Get
Innovative at Home!
ClickAtHome Team
From: Stacy E Dickson@ECT on 01/10/2001 08:54 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Internet Service
Is there an estimated rollout date on the Internet Service portion of the
pilot program? If it is going to be awhile do you recommend subscribing to a
service during the interim period?
Thanks
Stacy | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi Jeff -- The West gas desk (Janie Tholt and Mike Grisby) have asked to receive more information about what is going on in the California gas side (for example, updates on the intrastate infrastructure issues, etc.). Do you mind sending them some periodic updates and ccing our gas group (Leslie Lawner, Becky Cantrell, Melinda Pharms, Jim Steffes, and me)? Thanks! Christi | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI on spread sheet feeds.
---------------------- Forwarded by James New/LON/ECT on 08/12/2000 09:36
---------------------------
Enron Europe
From: Hugo Moreira 07/12/2000 17:17
To: David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Jubril Oguja/LON/ECT@ECT, James New/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phil Yoxall/LON/ECT@ECT, John Paskin/LON/ECT@ECT,
Ganapathy Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Powell/HOU/ECT@ECT, David A Wall/Risk
Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: London Spreadsheet feeds.
David,
I confirm that all spreadsheets but SpreadID 2, 8 and 9 will be sent to
Risktrac Test and CAS Test.
SpreadID No. 2 will be sent to RisktRAC & CAS Production.
Per RAC, SpreadID No.8 and 9 will be roll-out later.
Hugo
David Hardy
07/12/2000 15:45
To: Jubril Oguja/LON/ECT@ECT, Hugo Moreira/LON/ECT@ECT, James
New/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phil Yoxall/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Paskin/LON/ECT@ECT, Ganapathy Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Powell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: London Spreadsheet feeds.
All,
My understanding is that all the spreadsheets listed on the attachments will
be sent to Houston tomorrow.
All except SpreadID No.2 will be sent to Risktrac Test and CAS Test.
SpreadID No. 2 will be sent to RisktRAC & CAS Production.
Please advise ( all the above addressees ) if this is not the case / going to
happen .
Regards
David | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Looks fine to me.
Kay
Ben F Jacoby@ECT
05/11/2001 12:49 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Navigant Letter Re: GE 7FAs | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Gentlemen,
I spoke to Ted Murphy today on the status of our limit and sector approval
request and was told that I do not have your support. I asked Ted if he
thought this was a mistake and he replied that Mike was very direct. In
light of our meeting with Skilling and the feedback I got back, I'm not sure
I understand your direction.
I essentially have no limits for the convertible arbitrage book as
explained in the limit/sector proposal and will be forced to close the
positions ( with out some form of relief ). When we get Enron Metal's
positions in currencies and rates added to my limit structure, I will have
little room to engage in proprietary trading. I need to redefine and expand
the equity sectors and increase risk levels to maintain staff and generate
the level of income we have planned in 2001.
Gary | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange
The Newsletter for the True Texas Longhorn Faithful
Volume 11, No. 25, October 1, 2001
Longhorns Blast Raiders, Run Record to 4-0;
Huge Showdown with OU Looms Saturday
Junior QB Chris Simms completed his first 10 passes and 235-pound sophomore
RB Ivan Williams bulled for 152 yards and two touchdowns to spark Texas to a
42-7 victory over Texas Tech Saturday night in Austin.
Simms had his sharpest performance as a Longhorn, completing 21 of 26 passes
for 224 yards and a touchdown, and scoring two TDs on 1-yard sneaks.
It also was easily Williams' best game. His strong runs gave the Longhorns
such balance that they scored on their first three possessions and kept the
Raiders' defenders guessing all night.
The Longhorn defense, coming out in a 3-4 and inserting sensational freshman
LB Derrick Johnson in place of DT Maurice Gordon, also rebounded strongly
after last week's poor showing in the victory over Houston.
The victory ran Texas' record to 4-0 for the first time since 1983.
But getting to 5-0 will prove a monumental task for the No. 5 Longhorns
because they will face defending national champion and No. 3-rated Oklahoma
Saturday at 2:30 p.m. in the teams' traditional showdown in the Cotton Bowl
in Dallas (see OU scouting report in second part)
Defensive coordinator Carl Reese, a staunch advocate of man-for-man pass
defense, fed Texas Tech's high-octane offense a steady dose of zone coverages
Saturday night.
He also got to use his favored man-for-man defense on occasion, but it was
primarily a tight zone with a lot of different looks that was responsible for
holding the Raiders to seven points.
The Longhorn defenders kept the dangerous Tech receivers in front of them,
making them catch the ball in the short flat most of the time, then try to
use their speed to make something big happen.
The Raiders' problem is that this Texas defense is speedy, too, and those
two-yard catches often became four-yard gains.
Consider these telling statistics - the Raiders couldn't run (11 carries for
36 net yards) and they threw 58 passes, completing 40 of them for 260 yards.
That's a net gain of just under 4.5 yards per pass and it's exactly 6.5 yards
per completion.
Raider coach Mike Leach, who had poked fun at Texas CBs Quentin Jammer and
Rod Babers and QB Chris Simms in pre-game comments, gave them little credit
in his post-game interview, then bristled when a Lubbock reporter asked him
about all the short passes Raider QB Kliff Kingsbury threw.
"I don't know who all those experts are that know so much about going
vertical," Leach said. "I would guess I know a lot more about going vertical
than they do. With that being the case, I thought we went vertical the right
number of times."
Their longest pass completion was 25 yards and they only scored 7 points, so
maybe they did and maybe they didn't.
What he didn't say was that the swarming UT defense didn't give the Raiders
much chance to go deep - or vertical - in his terminology.
Here, briefly, is how the game went
First Quarter
The Longhorns won the toss and deferred, so Tech took the ball. The UT
defense forced a quick punt. Simms led the Longhorns 80 yards in 11 plays,
hitting five straight passes, all of them to WR Roy Williams, for 49 yards.
Ivan Williams got the other 31 yards on six bullish runs, including the final
two yards for the TD. Dusty Mangum's kick gave Texas a 7-0 lead with 7:49
left. After another Tech punt, the Longhorns struck again, going 74 yards in
nine plays. Simms was 3-for-3 on the drive, hitting WR B. J. Johnson twice
for 23 yards and TE Bo Scaife once for 5 yards. But Ivan Williams had the big
play, a 30-yard run to the Raiders' 21. Simms got the TD on a 1-yard run.
Mangum's kick gave Texas a 14-0 lead with 1:26 left. The Longhorns totally
dominated the quarter, leading 8-3 in first downs, 77-20 in rushing yardage,
77-44 in passing yardage and 154-64 in total offense. But the Raiders were
driving for the first time as the quarter ended.
Second Quarter
Tech's Ricky Williams squirted through a huge hole on a fourth-and-1 and
dashed 31 yards for a touchdown on the second play of the quarter, cutting
the UT lead to 14-7 just 33 seconds deep. But the Longhorn offense retaliated
immediately. Victor Ike returned the kickoff to the UT 47, and Simms found
Roy Williams with a 40-yard TD pass two plays later. Mangum's kick gave Texas
a 21-7 lead with 13:00 left. Tech drove to the UT 9 late in the half, but LBs
DeAndre Lewis and Tyrone Jones stopped Kingsbury a yard short of a first down
on a keeper that got to the UT 7. Simms was 13 for 15 for 130 yards and a
touchdown at the half. TE Bo Scaife who had 5 receptions for 64 yards, had a
rare drop, and Simms' other incompletion was one he threw away under a big
rush.
Third Quarter
The Longhorns put the game on ice with two touchdowns in a 46-second span
early in the second half. They drove 80 yards in 10 plays to start the half.
Ivan Williams got the touchdown on a 1-yard run. He had six carries for 39 y
ards on the drive and Simms hit Scaife twice for 37 yards. Mangum's kick gave
Texas a 28-7 lead with 10:44 left. Derrick Johnson ripped the ball out of
Ivory McCann's grasp on the kickoff and walk-on Richard Hightower recovered
at the Tech 13. Williams carried twice to the 1, then Simms scored on a
sneak. Mangum's kick put UT on top, 35-7, with 9:58 left. Neither team
threatened again in the quarter.
Fourth Quarter
Tech drove to the Texas 15 early in the fourth quarter, but a fourth-down
pass fell incomplete. Texas came back with a 12-play, 85-yard scoring drive.
Simms gave way to Major Applewhite during the drive. Ike got the touchdown on
a 1-yard run. Redshirt freshman RB Sneezy Beltran got his first three carries
of the year on the final Texas' possession, netting six yards.
Game Quotes . .
"We didn't play as well as we should have tonight. We got stopped at key
times on all sides of the ball and didn't play together as well as Texas did.
The Longhorns deserve a lot of credit for their effort."
- Texas Tech head coach Mike Leach
* * * *
"These spread offenses are like the wishbone. If they know what you're doing
and where you're going to line up, they'll get you. With that kind of
offense, you've got to play around a little, give them a two-man rush, a
three-man rush, just keep them guessing. We've got another offense like that
coming up this week (Oklahoma). We can't just do the same things we did
tonight. We'll have to come up with some new wrinkles."
- Texas defensive coordinator Carl Reese
* * * *
"We ran for more than 200 yards and we passed for more than 200 yards. Chris
(Simms) played extremely well. I think his best game is yet to come. He gets
better each week. I think he's playing within himself."
- UT offensive coordinator Greg Davis, talking about the offense in general
and answering a question about whether this was Simms' best game
* * * *
"The line did a great job of blocking. We go out every Saturday and play the
game like it's the national championship game. OU will be a great game and
we're looking forward to the challenge."
- Longhorn RB Ivan Williams, who had a career best 152 yards rushing
* * * *
"We showed them some things they hadn't seen before from us. It was a lot of
fun.."
- Texas' senior LB De'Andre Lewis
* * * *
"Roy (Williams) split the two safeties. They gave us the look we wanted. It
was a great call by coach (Greg Davis). They gave us the middle of the field
all night."
- UT QB Chris Simms, talking about his 40-yard touchdown pass to Roy Williams
and the Raider defense
* * * *
"It's not like getting an extra cornerback in there, but our linebackers are
all pretty fast. It was a lot of fun getting to play most of the game.
- UT freshman LB Derrick Johnson, who got his first start, talking about the
3-4 defense
* * * *
"They did what they needed to do, running and passing the football. We got a
tail kicking."
- Tech defensive coordinator Greg McMackin
* * * *
"We had opportunities, but we struggled in the red zone early. In the second
half, the wheels just came off. I have to take my hat off to the Longhorns.
They played a great game tonight."
- Raider QB Kliff Kingsbury
900 Number Updated Daily
I update my 900 number every day with football and football recruiting news.
The number is 1-900-288-8839. It costs $1.59 a minute. You must be 18 or
older to call.
Coach's Corner
Coach Mack Brown said Sunday a thorough study of Saturday night's game film
by all of the Texas coaches showed "nearly everybody played well" for the
Longhorns.
He also said the team has improved since the beginning of the season and said
it is important that it continue to improve.
"We feel good about where we are," he said. "We'll know a lot more after
Saturday because this will be by far the best team we have played."
He was referring, of course, to the upcoming meeting in Dallas with Oklahoma.
Brown said it was really important for the players to focus on the Texas Tech
game last week.
"We're really excited about the way the guys played," he said. "It was a
tough game to play because so many people were already talking about the
Oklahoma game."
"We told our team last week the OU game wouldn't be nearly as important to us
if we didn't beat Texas Tech, and Texas Tech is a good football team that we
knew would come in here and play us hard."
He said the Longhorns new 3-4 defense, with freshman LB Derrick Johnson
replacing DT Maurice Gordon, worked great against Tech because "it gave us
more speed."
Against more run-oriented teams, he said the Longhorns' base defense will
still be the 4-3.
"We felt going into the kind of offenses we're going into (Tech and
Oklahoma), we needed to change it up, play some zone, try to give the
quarterback some indecision and keep the ball in front of us."
"We've been using it since the spring, but we didn't feel like we needed it
against Houston," Brown said.
He also said the three starting linebackers, all seniors "have been playing
the best since we've been here." He said Johnson "is just so talented that we
needed to get him in there, and we can do that in a 3-4 with an extra
linebacker."
"We've been losing three games a year since we got here," Brown said. "In the
games we lose, we've been giving up too many big plays, playing too much man
for man."
He said the use of some zone coverages in the secondary helps the defensive
backs "keep the receivers in front of them, helps eliminate some of those big
plays."
Offensively, he said the Horns are much better this year than they were last
year at this time.
"Chris (Simms) has a lot more experience. The receivers have more
experience," he said. "We're blocking better, we're running better. Last year
we weren't able to run the ball consistently and we had one quarterback who
was hurt some (Major Applewhite) and one who hadn't played much (Simms), and
that really hurt us."
He said Simms is playing much better than he did early last year and he said
the emergence of TE Bo Scaife has helped the offense.
Scaife was supposed to be a weapon last year, but suffered a season-ending
knee injury during the pre-season drills.
"My goal, and the assistant coaches' goal, is to make this team the best team
it can be," he said. "We also want to continue to improve, to be a better
team at the end of the year than we were at the beginning." | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jaime:
Thanks for the information! Mark | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: "scott crowell" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:08 AM
To: Giron, Darron C.
Subject: Fwd: FW: Are you ready for some football?
>From: "Laurence, Andrea" <[email protected]>
>To: "Adam Devine (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Alex Stopka
>(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Alice Hurley (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Andrea Weimeyer (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Andreas Neuffer (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Grossi, Anthony L" <[email protected]>,
> "Bob Helbing (E-mail 2)" <[email protected]>,
> "Diana, Christopher J" <[email protected]>, "Cory Hartquist
>(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Dana Schroeder (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Gerard Devine (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Graham Johnston (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Woodson, Granville M"
><[email protected]>, "Frates, Gretchen" <[email protected]>,
>"Hugh Brown (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Jean McHugh (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Jeff Ottenbreit (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Myles, Joanne D" <[email protected]>,
> "McGlothlin, Julia J" <[email protected]>, "Krista Pearl
>(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Marc Laurence (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Michael Laurence (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Michael McCall (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Kelleher, Michael P"
><[email protected]>, "Weisfeld, Michael" <[email protected]>,
> "Michele Farley (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Mike Ibay
>(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Patty McKenna (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Paul Rude (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Rashida Mitchell (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Russell Sole (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Scott Crowell (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Rodiger, Stephan"
><[email protected]>, "Sue Tafrate (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
> "Stoltz, Suzanne" <[email protected]>, "Arcona, Teresa"
><[email protected]>, "Morley, Thomas" <[email protected]>,
>"Todd Edwards (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Todd Lantor (E-mail)"
><[email protected]>, "Tom Stolpman (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
>Subject: FW: Are you ready for some football?
>Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:29:04 -0400
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, October 19 , 2001 9:52 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Fwd: Are you ready for some football?
>
>
>this might be guy humor, but it is one of the funniest damn things i have
>ever read
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:36 PM
>To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
>Subject: Fwd: Are you ready for some football?
>
>
>
>this one should remind you guys of our sojourn to new orleans last fall ...
>it takes a while to read, but it's worth it. j --
>
>
>
>
>Fan on Game Day--- (apologies if you've seen this before...worth another
>
>look)
>
>This is pretty long, but it's HYSTERICAL! If you've ever been drunk at a
>
>sporting event, or been with someone who has, you can relate.
>
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>+++
>
>This is an e-mail from some guy named J.D. Horne, who, according to the
>
>messages that were attached to this, is not a 21 year-old frat boy, but an
>
>attorney of indeterminate age. He sent it to his friend Brian Brice and it
>
>got forwarded around the country. You have to give the guy some props for
>
>being self-deprecating...but I hope I never meet him on game day.
>
>A chronology of events for Saturday, December 4, 1999, and the early
>morning
>
>hours of Sunday, December 5, 1999:
>
>
>6:00 Arise, play the Eyes of Texas and Texas Fight at full-freaking blast
>
>6:20 Get in car, drive to New Braunfels
>
>7:30 Tee off (me and a buddy were the FIRST tee-time of the morning)
>
>8:50 Turn 9 (crack open first beer)
>
>8:53 Crack open second beer
>
>8:58 Crack open...(you get the idea)
>
>10:30 Finish 18 (holes, as well as beers), sign scorecard for smoooooth 95.
>
>10:35 Headed for San Antonio (Alamodome - Nebraska vs Texas)
>
>10:50 Buy three 18-packs for pre- and post-game festivities
>
>11:10 We decide we don't have enough booze, so we double-back to a liquor
>
>store and buy the good ol' 750 ml plastic bottle "Traveler" Jim Beam
>
>11:50 Arrive at the tailgate spot. Awesome day. Not a single cloud in the
>
>sky. About 70 degrees.
>
>11:55 I decide that we're going to kick the shit out of Nebraska.
>
>11:56 I tell my first Nebraska fan to go fuck himself.
>
>12:15 The UT band walks by on the way to the Alamodome. We're on the second
>
>floor of a two-story parking garage on the corner (a couple hundred of us).
>
>We're hooting and hollering like wildmen. The band doubles back to the
>
>street right below us and serenades us with Texas Fight and The Eyes of
>
>Texas. AWESOME MOMENT.
>
>12:25 In the post-serenade serendipity, 50-100 grown men are bumping chests
>
>with one another, each and every one of them now secure and certain of the
>
>fact that we are going to kick the shit out of Nebraska.
>
>1:00 The Nebraska band walks by on the way to the Alamodome. Again, we hoot
>
>and holler like wildmen. Again, the band doubles back and stops right below
>
>us to serenade us, this time, however, with the Nebraska fight songs.
>
>Although somewhat impressed by their spirit and verve, we remain convinced
>
>that we are going to kick the shit out of Nebraska.
>
>1:30 I begin the walk to the Alamodome, somehow managing to stuff the
>
>"Traveler" and 11 cans of beer into my pants.
>
>1:47 I am in line surrounded by Nebraska fans. They are taunting me. I am
>
>taunting back, still certain that we are going to kick the shit out of
>
>Nebraska. I decide to challenge a particularly vocal Nebraska fan to play
>
>what I now call and will forever be remembered as Cell-Phone Flop Out."
>
>Remember flop out for a dollar? The rules are similar. I tell this
>
>Nebraska jackass that if he's so confident in his team, he should "flop
>out"
>
>his cell phone RIGHT NOW and make plane reservations to Phoenix for the
>
>Fiesta Bowl. And then I spoke these memorable words: "And not those damn
>
>refundable tickets, either! You request those non-refundable,
>
>non-transferrable sons-of-bitches!" He backs down. He is unworthy.
>
>I call Southwest Airlines and buy two tickets to Phoenix, non-refundable
>and
>
>non-transferrable. Price: $712. He is humbled. He lowers his head in
>
>shame. I raise my cell phone in triumph to the cheers of hundreds of Texas
>
>fans. I am KING and these are my subjects. I distribute the 11 beers in my
>
>pants to the cheering masses. I RULE the pre-game kingdom.
>
>2:34 Kickoff. Brimming with confidence, I open the Traveler and pour my
>
>first stiffy.
>
>2:45 I notice something troubling: Nebraska is big. Nebraska is fast.
>
>Nebraska is very pissed off at Texas.
>
>3:01 The first quarter mercifully ends. 9 yards total offense for Texas.
>
>Zero first downs for Texas. I'm still talking shit. I pour another stiffy
>
>from the Traveler.
>
>3:36 Four minutes to go in the first half: the Traveler is a dead soldier.
>
>I buy my first $5 beer from the Alamodome merchants. While I am standing in
>
>line, a center snap nearly decapitates Major Applewhite and rolls out of
>the
>
>end zone. Safety.
>
>3:56 Halftime score: Nebraska 15, Texas 0. I wish I had another Traveler.
>
>4:11 While urinating next to a Nebraska fan in the bathroom at halftime, I
>
>attempt to revive the classic Brice-ism from the South Bend bathroom:
>
>"Hey, buddy, niiiiiiiiice cock." He is unamused.
>
>4:21 I buy my 2nd and 3rd $5 beer from the Alamodome merchants. I share my
>
>beer with two high school girls sitting behind me. Surprisingly, they are
>
>equipped with a flask full of vodka. I send them off to purchase Sprites,
>
>so that we may consume their vodka. I have not lost faith.
>
>Nebraska is a bunch of pussies.
>
>4:51 No more vodka. The girls sitting behind me have fled for their lives.
>
>I purchase two more $5 beers from the Alamodome merchants.
>
>5:18 Score is Nebraska 22, Texas 0. I am beginning to lose faith. This
>
>normally would trouble me, but I am too drunk to see the football field.
>
>5:27 I call Southwest Airlines: "I'm sorry, sir. Those tickets have been
>
>confirmed and are non-refundable and non-transferrable."
>
>5:37 I try to start a fight with every person behind the concession
>counter.
>
>As it turns out, the Alamodome has a policy that no beer can be sold when
>
>there is less than 10 minutes on the game clock. I am enraged by this
>
>policy. I ask loudly: "Why the fuck didn't you announce last call over the
>
>fucking PA system??!!"
>
>5:49 Back in my seats, I am slumped in my chair in defeat. All of a sudden,
>
>the Texas crowd goes absolutely nuts.
>
>"Whazzis?," I mutter, awaking from my coma, "Iz we winnig? Did wez scort?"
>
>Alas, the answer is no, we were not winning and we did not score. The
>
>largest (by far) cheer of the day from the Texas faithful occurred when the
>
>handlers were walking back to the tunnel and Bevo (the Texas mascot)
>stopped
>
>to take a gargantuan shit all over the letters "S", "K", and "A" in the
>
>"Nebraska" spelled out in their end zone. I cheer wildly. I pick up the
>
>empty Traveler bottle and stick my tongue in it. I am thirsty.
>
>6:16 Nebraska fans are going berserk as I walk back to the truck. I would
>
>taunt them with some off-color remarks about their parentage, but I am too
>
>drunk to form complete sentences. With my last cognitive thought of the
>
>evening, I take solace in the fact that if we had not beaten them in
>
>October, they would be playing Florida State for the national championship.
>
>6:30 Back in the car. On the way back to Austin for the basketball game.
>
>8:00 Texas-Arizona tip off. We can still salvage the day! I crack open a
>
>beer. It is warm. I don't care.
>
>7:12 We have stopped for gas. I am hungry. I go inside the store. I walk
>
>past the beer frig. I notice a Zima. I've never had a Zima. I wonder if
>
>it's any good. I pull a Zima from the frig. I twist the top off and drink
>
>the Zima in three swallows. Zima sucks. I replace the empty bottle in the
>
>frig.
>
>7:17 There is a Blimpie Subs in the store. I walk to where the ingredients
>
>are, where the person usually makes the sub. There is no one there. I lean
>
>over the counter and scoop out half a bucket of black olives. I eat them.
>
>I am still hungry. I lean further over the counter and grab approximately
>
>two pounds of Pastrami. I walk out of the store grunting and eating
>
>Pastrami. The patrons in the store fear me. I don't care.
>
>8:01 We are in South Austin. I have been drinking warm beer and singing
>
>Brooks and Dunn tunes for over an hour. My truck-mate is tired of my
>
>singing. He suggests that perhaps Brooks and Dunn have written other good
>
>songs besides "You're Going to Miss Me When I'm Gone"
>
>and "Neon Moon" and that maybe listening to only those two songs, ten times
>
>each was a bit excessive. Perhaps, he suggests, I could just let the CD
>
>play on its own. I tell him to fuck off and restart "Neon Moon."
>
>8:30 We arrive at the Erwin Center. My truckmate, against my loud and
>
>profane protestations, parks on the top floor of a nearby parking garage. I
>
>tell him he's an idiot. I tell him we will never get out. I tell him we
>
>may as well pitch a fucking tent here. He ignores me.
>
>I think he's still pissed about the Brooks and Dunn tunes. I whistle "Neon
>
>Moon" loudly.
>
>8:47 I am rallying. I have 4 warm beers stuffed in my pants. We're going
>
>to kick the shit out of Arizona.
>
>9:11 Halftime score: Texas 31, Arizona 29. I am pleased. I go to the
>
>bathroom to pee for the 67th time today. I giggle to myself because of the
>
>new opportunity to do "the bathroom Brice." There are no Arizona fans in
>
>the bathroom. I am disappointed. I tell myself (out loud) that I have a
>
>"Niiiiiice cock." No one is amused but me.
>
>9:41 I walk to the bathroom while drinking Bud Light out of a can. Needless
>
>to say, they do not sell beer at the Erwin Center,much less Bud Light out
>of
>
>a can. I am stopped by an usher: "Where did you get that, sir?" I tell him
>
>(no shit): "Oh, the cheerleaders were throwing them up with those little
>
>plastic footballs. Would you mind throwing this away for me?" I take the
>
>last swig and hand it to him. He is confused. I pretend I'm going to the
>
>bathroom, but I run away giggling instead. I duck into some entrance to
>
>avoid the usher, who is now pursuing me. I sneak into a large group of
>
>people and sit down. The usher walks by harmlessly. I am giggling like a
>
>little girl. I crack open another can of Bud Light.
>
>9:52 I am lost. In my haste to avoid the usher, I have lost my bearings. I
>
>have no ticket stub. I cannot find my seats. Texas is losing.
>
>10:09 Texas is being screwed by the refs. I am enraged. I have cleared out
>
>the seats around me because I keep removing my hat and beating the
>
>surrounding chairs with it. A concerned fan asks if I'm OK and perhaps I
>
>shouldn't take it so seriously. I tell him to fuck off.
>
>10:15 After the fourth consecutive "worst fucking call I have EVER seen," I
>
>attempt to remove my hat again to begin beating inanimate objects.
>
>However, on this occasion I miscalculate and I thumbnail myself in my left
>
>eyelid, leaving a one-quarter inch gash over my eye. I am now bleeding into
>
>my left eye and all over my shirt. "Perhaps," I think to myself, I'm
>
>taking this a bit seriously."
>
>10:22 I am standing in the bathroom peeing. I'm so drunk I am swaying and
>
>grunting. I have a bloody napkin pressed on my left eye. My pants are
>
>bloody. I have my (formerly) white shirt wrapped around my waist. I look
>
>like I should be in an episode of Cops.
>
>10:43 Texas has lost. I put my bloody white shirt back on my body and make
>
>my way for the exits. I am stopped every 20 seconds by a good
>
>samaritan/cop/security guard to ask me why I am covered in blood, but I
>
>merely grunt incoherently and keep moving.
>
>10:59 With my one good eye, I have located the parking garage. I walk up
>
>six flights of stairs, promise that when I see my friend I will punch him
>in
>
>the face for making me walk up six flights of stairs, find the truck, and
>
>collapse in a heap in the bed of the truck. I look around and notice that
>
>traffic is lined up all the way around the garage, six whole flights, and
>no
>
>one is moving. I take a nap.
>
>11:17 I awake from my nap. I see my friend in the driver's seat. I lift my
>
>head to look out the bed of the truck and notice that traffic is lined up
>
>all the way around the garage, six whole flights, and no one is moving. I
>
>am too tired to punch my friend. I call my friend a "Stupid cocksucker."
>
>11:31 I lift my head to look out the bed of the truck and notice that
>
>traffic is lined up all the way around the garage, six whole flights, and
>no
>
>one is moving. I call my friend a "Stupid cocksucker."
>
>11:38 I lift my head to look out the bed of the truck and notice that
>
>traffic is lined up all the way around the garage, six whole flights, and
>no
>
>one is moving. I call my friend a "Stupid cocksucker."
>
>11:47 I lift my head to look out the bed of the truck and notice that
>
>traffic is lined up all the way around the garage, six whole flights, and
>no
>
>one is moving. I call my friend a "Stupid cocksucker."
>
>11:58 I am jostled. The truck is moving. I lift my head to look out the
>
>bed of the truck and notice that traffic is beginning to move on the second
>
>floor. I jump out of the truck, walk to the edge of the parking facility,
>
>and pee off the sixth floor onto the street below.
>
>My friend looks at me like I just anally violated his minor sister. I turn
>
>around pee on the front of his truck while singing the lyrics to "Neon
>
>Moon."
>
>12:11 We are moving. We are out of beer. I jump from the truck and go from
>
>vehicle to vehicle until someone gives me two beers. I am happy. I return
>
>to my vehicle
>
>12:26 We have emerged from the parking facility. We make our way to my
>
>apartment and find Ed sitting on the couch with a freshly opened bottle of
>
>Glenlivet on the coffee table in front of him. We are all going to die
>
>tonight.
>
>12:59 We have finished three-quarters of the bottle of Glenlivet. We decide
>
>it would be a wonderful idea to go dancing at PollyEsther's. Ed has to pee.
>
>He walks down the hall to our apartment and directly into the full length
>
>mirror at the end of the hall, smashing it into hundreds of pieces. We
>
>giggle uncontrollably and leave for PollyEsther's.
>
>1:17 The PollyEsther's doorman laughs uncontrollably at our efforts to
>enter
>
>his club. "Fellas," he says in between his fits of spastic laughter, "I've
>
>been working this door for almost a year. I've been working doors in this
>
>town for almost 5 years. And I can honestly say that I ain't never seen
>
>three drunker mother fuckers than you three. Sorry, can't let you in." We
>
>attempt to reason with him. He laughs harder.
>
>1:44 We find a bar that lets us in. We take two steps in the door and hear
>
>"Last call for alcohol!" I turn to the group and mutter: "See, dat wasn't
>
>that fuckin' hard. Day don't fuckin' do that at the Awamo...the awaom...the
>
>alab...fuck it, that stadium we was at today..." We order 6 shots of
>
>tequila and three beers.
>
>2:15 Back on the street. We need food. We hail a cab to take us the two
>
>and one half blocks to Katz's. The cab fare is $1.60. We give him $10 and
>
>tell him to keep it.
>
>2:17 There is a 20 minute wait. We give the hostess $50. We are seated
>
>immediately.
>
>2:25 We order two orders of fried pickles, a Cobb salad, a bowl of soup,
>two
>
>orders of Blueberry blintzes, two Reuben sandwiches, a hamburger, two
>cheese
>
>stuffed potatoes, an order of fries, and an order of onion rings.
>
>2:39 The food arrives. We are all asleep with our heads on the table. The
>
>waiter wakes us up. We eat every fucking bit of our food. Most of the
>
>restaurant patrons around us are disgusted. We don't give a fuck. The tab
>
>is $112 with tip.
>
>2:46 I'm sleepy.
>
>9:12 I wake up next to a strange woman. She is the bartender at Katz's.
>
>She is not pretty.
>
>
>
>*****************************************************************************
>The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
>privileged.
>It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone
>else
>is unauthorized.
>
>If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>distribution
>or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
>and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
>contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed
>in
>the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
>*****************************************************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Senator Bowen has canceled tomorrow's informational hearing on ESPs. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Just cc them- it's easier.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/19/2001 09:40 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: California Update 07.18.01
FYI. How would you like to handle?
Best,
Jeff
Steven J Kean
07/19/2001 08:37 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: California Update 07.18.01
These are useful updates. Please include Whalley, Lavorato, Parquet,
Dietrich, Delainey, Kitchens, Haedicke, Sanders, Kirby, Sharp, Leff, Calger,
Belden etc on future updates. Thanks
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/18/2001 08:18 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M
Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, [email protected], Karen Denne/Enron@EnronXGate,
Janel Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: California Update 07.18.01
The Senate, the Assembly and the Governor are either poised to engage in very
difficult negotiations, or the three are about to crash and burn and Edison's
going to be left dangling.
In the Senate:
The Senate bill 78XX is with about 90% likelihood going to be voted out of
the Senate tonight---without a vote having taking place in any committee.
Burton announced during one of the two "informational" hearings that "this is
it," despite the view of just about everyone who appeared before the
committees the bill likely won't prevent Edison from going bankrupt.
The key features of the bill are:
Banks and QFs get paid in full.
Edison shareholders would be responsible for debts owed to suppliers
No direct access.
There are conflicting reports about whether the Senate will take up the bill
tomorrow de-linking the bonds from the DWR contracts and whether the
Republicans will go along with it.
In the Assembly:
The Committee is hearing the Wright and Hertzberg bills as we speak, with
Hertzberg's the likely winner.
That bill now provides for Direct Access under certain conditions (the
amendments describing the conditions were faxed today).
We're attempting to get the "July 12" date changed to "the effective date of
the bill" or later.
The Assembly likely won't vote the Hertzberg bill out until tomorrow at the
earliest.
The Problem:
The Assembly and Senate bills are diametrically opposed in the way each
approaches the problem---in short, the bills are two ships passing in the
night.
The Democratic leaders (Governor, Hertzberg, Burton) aren't talking, and
Burton hasn't expressed any interest in talking---to anybody.
The likely outcome given the circumstances:
Burton says he's done what he needs to do (i.e., passed out a "fair" bill);
the Assembly and Senate can't agree; they finish the budget; time runs out;
they leave Friday; and Edison's left twisting.
That said, there's still a chance that the Governor could call Burton and sit
down with Burton and Hertzberg and work something out by Friday, or begin
talking and postpone the recess until they get it worked out. But given
Burton, the chance of that happening seems very slim.
In short, little has changed since yesterday.
Best,
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We will have activities on Thursday, April 26 for Bring Your Kid to Work
Day. Please RSVP to
Theresa Villeggiante via email by 5:00 PM on Tuesday, April 23 with your
guest(s) name and age.
The schedule:
8:00 - 9:00 Breakfast Served in Mt. Hood and with parents
9:00 - 9:45 What we do on the Trading Floor Presentation in Mt Hood
10:00 - 10:30 Join PGE Group for Fun On The Plaza (2WTC, Open Area) Electric
Cars, Line Truck Demo, etc.
10:30 - 11:00 Join PGE Group for tours (tour executive floor, load dispatch,
sign up at 10:00 on the plaza)
11:00 - 11:30 with parents
11:30 - 12:15 Lunch served (sandwiches, chips, cookies)
12:30 - 1:00 IMAGO Theatre's delightful FROGZ show w/PGE Group,
2WTC-Auditorium (suitable for all ages)
Remainder of the afternoon with parents.
Please note, parents must attend PGE activities with their child(ren).
Let me know if you have any questions and remember to RSVP on Tuesday!
Thanks.
Mollie | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Glad to help--concocting market based rates for storage facilities that
probably don't deserve them is one of the few things I know how to do. DF
Shelley Corman
04/20/2000 12:32 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Market-Based Storage
ENA is pursuing a gas storage project. One assumption of their project
development is the ability to attain market-based pricing for the facility.
Tom Shelton called looking for a primer on how to apply for market-based
rates. I gave him the 10,000 ft story of how any regulated entity can apply
for market-based rates under the Alternatives to Traditional Ratemaking
policy statement, but that to date only storage facilities have been
successful in willing market-based rate treatment. I think his client is
looking for more of a procedural look at what needs to be done. Do you care
if I send them a copy of the market-based storage testimony from the last
NNG rate case? Sorry, but I mentioned that you forged market based storage
services for Market Hub Partners in your former life. So, don't be surprised
if you hear from Tom Shelton or his client John Allario. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Given our current views of the natural gas markets, we are requesting an
increase in our VAR limits from 40 million to 45 million until next Tuesday.
John | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We are hoping to have the retreat on Thursday, Nov. 8 and Friday, Nov. 9 at McMenamins Edgefield (see <http://www.mcmenamins.com/Edge/index.html>) just outside of Portland.
Our meeting will be all day Thursday and 1/2 day Friday. Details to follow.
Please confirm your availbility ASAP and let me know if there is any conflict in your schedule.
Thanks!
Jenny | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Pagers, Cell Phones, etc should be cancelled as of closing which I believe to be June 1st, I will let you know if there are any changes. When I arrange for new traders I will need computers for them. I have talked to Ed and Brian and they have agreed to give me 4 computers back prior to closing. I anticipate needing 2 of them prior to the end of the month. How much lead time do you need to have them brought down here? Did you get the message out about customer entertainment?
Thanks,
Tom | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI. The EES USA organization has been reorganized to centralize all sales teams under Jeremy Blachman. Scott Gahn's group stays unchanged.
Harry, you and I may want to let people in the field know these changes?
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Lopez, Yolanda
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 4:02 PM
To: Steffes, James D.
Subject: Organization Update - EES USA
---------------------- Forwarded by Yolanda Lopez/HOU/EES on 08/09/2001 04:00 PM ---------------------------
Enron Energy Services From: EES Office of Chairman 08/07/2001 07:10 PM
Sent by: EES Distribution
To: All EES
cc:
Subject: Organization Update - EES USA
Attached please find two documents from EES Office of Chairman:
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Baughman Jr., Don
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:47 PM
To: May, Tom
Subject: RE: Follow up meeting on services
ADM Power Portfolio Evaluation
Market Conditions:
Ratings (#1 Best)
1. Decatur, IL (IP Control Area = CA)
2. Southport, NC (CP&L CA)
3. Clinton, IA and Cedar Rapids, IA (Alliant CA)
4. Peoria, IL (CILCO CA)
5. Des Moines, IA (MEC CA)
The most desirable ADM facility is the Decatur, IL plant, in regards to market conditions, some of which are:
1. Dynegy/IP are trading an IP-TVA,AMRN,CEAEP,MEC hourly physical product online @ DynegyDirect.com
2. IP CA has 8 Direct connects to other utilities(UT), 5 of which are very desirable e.g.. TVA, AEP, AMRN, MEC, CE.
3. Several smaller UTs in the general area, this is a benefit due to their propensity to be short/long small and non-standard quantities.
The facilities in CP&L is rated 2 due to excess mw levels and location. SERC is a prime market area due to it is net short during peak periods under gas generation. The next most desirable facilities are the Clinton & Cedar Rapids which are both connected to the ALT CA. The major advantage is the accessibility to the MAPP area due to its abundance of cheap base load power. ALT is on the border of both the MAPP area (good cheap supply) and MAIN (good supply & demand.) The peoria plant is farther down on the scale due to CILCO few interconnects AMRN, IP, CWL&P and CE, these are good major interconnects , however, the CILCO CA is very small. The lowest ranked facility in ADM's portfolio is the Des Moines plant is located in the MEC CA. The MEC CA is located on the border of MAIN & MAPP which has benefits, but , the major hurdle is the small load and generation levels. Small amounts are very difficult to supply and market.
Transmission by CA:
Ratings:
1. CP&L = Ample amounts of transmission, limited congestion problems.
2. IP = Good levels of available trans. some congestion problems.
3. ALT = Acceptable levels of ATC, some congestion problems.
4. CILCO = Ample ATC for small CA size. Fewer interconnects than others.
5. MEC = Limited ATC and congestions difficulties.
Please contact me with any questions or additional information.
Don Baughman
Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
Mid-west Real-time Power Trading
713.853.0392
-----Original Message-----
From: May, Tom
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 1:52 PM
To: Baughman Jr., Don
Cc: Baughman, Edward D.; Will, Lloyd
Subject: FW: Follow up meeting on services
Don,
As we discussed, can you please provide some comments on each of the ADM locations listed on the attachment below. Some thoughts on the difficulty of moving power in each area (ie transmission availability) as well as the general market conditions and opportunities in each would be helpful. Also, any comments on how difficult the utility involved is to deal with would be good. The intention is to pick one or more sites for a trial management deal with ADM.
Thanks,
Tom.
-----Original Message-----
From: Baughman, Edward D.
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 5:30 PM
To: May, Tom; Will, Lloyd
Subject: FW: Follow up meeting on services
Guys: Here it is. Let me know if you need additional data for the initial analysis. Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Baughman, Edward D.
Subject: Re: Follow up meeting on services
Ed, here is the info you requested. I will be staying with my relatives in
Pearland. Call me Friday to firm up meeting times.
Bret
(See attached file: Locations.doc)
"Baughman, Edward D." <[email protected]> on 07/10/2001 02:18:45
PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Follow up meeting on services
Bret:
Thanks again for taking time to meet with Tom May, Terri Clynes and me
regarding Enron's power services products on June 27.
I would like to firm a date for our follow up meeting. We had discussed
your coming to Houston to meet at our office on Tuesday
July 24. Does that date work for you ? I would propose flying down the
night before. We could meet in the morning then play golf in
the afternoon followed by dinner at Cafe Annie (one of Houston's best).
Alternatively, you could fly down Tuesday morning for an
afternoon meeting followed by dinner, cigars, etc. Let me know what
works best.
In addition, we had discussed 6 facilities to look at for potential
services trials. They were Southport, Peoria, Clinton, Cedar Rapids,
Decatur and Des Moines. Can you provide the following information by
facility:
1. plant demand
2. generation capability
3. utility tariff facility is under
4. does facility have an interconnect agreement
5. " " " real-time metering
6. what is the voltage level of the interconnection
If you could provide this information in advance of the July 24 meeting,
we can perform some critical initial due diligence. Let me know
if the July 24 date works for you.
Regards, Ed
- Locations.doc << File: Locations.doc >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This is the BEST EVER!
?
>http://www.colonize.com/warp/index.html | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hello Eric Saibi,
This is an automated email delivery. The following info is for
tracking purposes only:
Transaction: 0000202661
Fulfillment: 00203618*00002
Location : 00006
Industrial Information Resources, Inc.
Customer Service Department
(713) 783-5147
- OUTAGE.dbf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.