text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Larry, listed below are the 3 goals i put in for your group. This was fine
for today but please review and make any changes needed to be more accurate
and also to add detail.
Finance and Structuring
? Create $15 million in gross margin and $12 million in EBIT
? Create earnings and structures that utilities Enron,s, structures to
minimize balance sheet and maximize earnings and cash flows
? Create funds flow of $150 million and net cash flow of $59 million
thanks,
m | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks. Sounds like a solid no.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Suarez, John; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: RE: FW: Enrico Bauli
So the scoop is He is Average.
He recently moved out of Bandwidth 6 weeks ago and back into Continental Power trading - why he is moving again after 6 weeks. Is it a problem with the business or him?
He worked for Marcello Romano (Head of Bandwidth Trading in Europe) as John knows. Marcello says he is a solid hard worker who has no edge. If Marcello were to run UK Gas again he wouldn't take him - as he is not sharp. So he wouldn't bother to move him across the Atlantic if it costs a lot.
Your call. Ring Marcello for more information.
Louise
-----Original Message-----
From: Suarez, John
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 6:56 PM
To: Presto, Kevin M.; Kitchen, Louise
Subject: Re: FW: Enrico Bauli
I will follow up on monday morning.
John D. Suarez
Enron Broadband Services
(713) 853-5267
(713) 443-5267 mobile
(877) 597-0646 pager
-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M. <[email protected]>
To: Kitchen, Louise <[email protected]>
CC: Suarez, John <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat Sep 15 18:51:20 2001
Subject: FW: Enrico Bauli
Louise - Do you know this gentleman from your days in London? His resume looks good and he is interested in moving to Houston and working in East Power.
John Suarez - You are going to need at least one and probably two solid cash/term traders for the SE region. Talk to Seresh about this guy.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bauli, Enrico
Sent: Thu 9/13/2001 6:42 AM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:
Subject: Enrico Bauli
Kevin,
thanks for taking a look at this.
I will talk to you in the next days to see if you think I will make enough money for you.
Best Regards,
Enrico
+44 207 783 6560
<<CV194.doc>> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Below is the name and phone number of the woman that I worked with to arrange
our tour of Enron Field. She may not be the person to talk with regarding
displaying a boat, but will very likely be able to give the correct
contact. It was nice to meet you. I have enjoyed getting to know Bethany
through NCL. Good luck!
Jill McCormick
713-259-8965 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I spoke with Dick Vincent who indicated that we will have no problem
obtaining 12 mos renewable business interruption insurance when we go
operational on gas. This should solve the warranty issue with the banks
because it covers defects, design, and workmanship on the turbines and
includes lost profits, etc. Incidentally, for insurance purposes the
turbines are designated DE3 which is not a new technology designation.
Typically we will always have this coverage in place but if their is a
supplier warranty then the party providing the warranty pays ahead of the
insurer. In the case where the supplier does not pay or the warranty has
ended then the insurer will pay.
Now we just need to come up with a fix for the drop dead date.
Regards,
Rob | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
it's changed.
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/20/2001 02:33 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: natsource check out
he is correct it should be july 02, but he has july 01
Kate Symes @ ECT 03/20/2001 04:15 PM
To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: natsource check out
mike says 555403 is Q3-02 - it's been changed
but he thinks 555404 should be Jul-02, not Q3-02 - is Natsource broker sure?
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/20/2001 01:31 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: natsource check out
555403
broker has Q302
555404
broker has Q302
thanks | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I'll probably go to the tour and, if weather permits, the game.
Enron Capital Management
From: David Baumbach 05/01/2000 07:55 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: GAME TONIGHT @ 7:45
Are you going to the Enron Field tour? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Would you please verify the accuracy of Parts C and D of Brent's report?
Thanks. Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/11/99 11:39
AM ---------------------------
Brent Hendry@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/04/99 12:55 PM
To: Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, [email protected], Jeffrey T
Hodge@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan J Hyvl@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara
Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: BA deal report
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
04/10/99 02:53 PM ---------------------------
Carolina Waingortin
04/10/99 06:51 PM
To: Diomedes Christodoulou/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Porter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy
Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Susan
Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roberto Pensotti, Brett R
Wiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Federico
Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Pearlman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rodolfo
Freyre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Guillermo
Atenor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maria Ines
Granado/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff
Kabel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John J
Shoobridge/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue
Frusco/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cynthia L
Schneider@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Patricia Cini@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julian
Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andre
Cangucu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allison
Venditti/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gabriela
Aguilar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christine
Garcia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana
Morse/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pablo
Acevedo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edson
Pavao/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Claudia Brun, D'Arcy
Carroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Idel
Metzger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter E
Weidler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Veronica
Leppez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike G
Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Remi
Collonges/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ricky Lynn
Waddell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Guillermo
Canovas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diego
Hollweck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, [email protected], Andrea
Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Guillermo
Mulville/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bernardo
Andrews/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Laura
Feldman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: BA deal report
Let me know if you have any problems with the attachment.
Thanks.
C. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jeremy,
Please add Eric Moon to the list of users for the Canadian Logic On/Off
script. Thanks.
DG | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The gas book liquidated twice, so our QTD and YTD was understated. I
manipulated west hedge to back off the liquidation, and then had to bring the
west hedge new balance into DPR 11/30, which also impacted DPR 12/01, and
DPR 12/04.
In numbers, LT books QTD and YTD increased on 11/30 by approximately 1.1mm
to $4,238,083 and $477,795,999 respectively. That increase had to flow
through to the 12/01 and 12/04 post hoc. I re-published and re-exported
11/30 and 12/01 using the Report files for 11/30, 12/01.
As an aside, Life To Date westhedge numbers are not completely incorporated
into the 11/30 through current DPRs, so I will continue to address the Life
To Date until it is fixed. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Susan:
Could you please when you return on Monday circulate a list of issues that we
need to discuss regarding the forms? Susan Flynn was keeping track of some
of those issues after you left. I would like to try to get those issues
addressed next week with the people that we need to talk to so that we can
turn a draft of the ISDA Schedules, so please make this a priority. Thanks.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
PeopleFinder <[email protected]>
05/16/2000 09:13 PM
Please respond to peoplefinder
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: PeopleFinder change confirmation #958525991.701
This is a change ticket from the PeopleFinder.
The PeopleFinder received these changes to your information
from the Change Request page on 5/16/2000:
change Confirmation email preference to "mail_lotus"
change Lotus Notes to "Taylor, Mark A"
change Confirm external changes to "yes"
If you want these changes made to your information,
simply reply to this message. (Don't change the subject line.)
If you don't want these changes, throw this message away.
We're sorry, but cc:Mail is not supported at this time. If you
are reading this in cc:Mail, your reply will not reach the PeopleFinder.
Please set your Confirmation email preference on the Change page to
Internet until you have Lotus Notes installed on your PC. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: "Michael Richter" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Giron, Darron C.
Subject: RE: Saturday
If you need a place to stay, you are more than welcome to stay with us. We moved to Flower Mound, but it is still pretty good access to Texas Stadium.
Michael Richter
Business Partner Sales Specialist
Lotus for eServer, South Central U.S.
IBM Americas' Software, Partnership Sales
1503 LBJ Freeway
Dallas, TX 75234
972-280-6574 t/l 542-6574
e-mail mrichter @us.ibm.com
[email protected] 11/26/2001 01:51 PM To: Michael Richter/Dallas/IBM@IBMUS cc: Subject: RE: Saturday
Good. The game is in Irving, so I will try to find a hotel around there.
It is also at 7:00pm. We will get into town early so we can come by and
see you guys. You moved to a new house, right? I'll keep you posted.
DG
-----Original Message-----
From: "Michael Richter" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Giron, Darron C.
Subject: Re: Saturday
Darron,
We'll be here. Let us know what works best for you. Hook 'em Horns!
Mike
Michael Richter
Business Partner Sales Specialist
Lotus for eServer, South Central U.S.
IBM Americas' Software, Partnership Sales
1503 LBJ Freeway
Dallas, TX 75234
972-280-6574 t/l 542-6574
e-mail mrichter @us.ibm.com
|-----------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------->
| |"Giron, Darron C." <[email protected]> 11/26/2001 10:13 AM |
| | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| To: Michael Richter/Dallas/IBM@IBMUS |
|cc: Subject: Saturday |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------|
Mike,
We are going to be in Dallas for the Big XII Championship game on
Saturday night. I just wanted to see if you guys were going to be in
town. If so, we would like to come by and see you guys. Especially the
newest edition. Let me know.
DG
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
we are playing tenn. they are going to hammer us. i am going in. it should
be on at 530 espn your time. griese and davis starting sunday? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Yes - and boats. I wasn't too worried until the last update which indicates
the storm has lost forward momentum and is just drifting out there - just
barely east of due south of the BVI. They are predicting that it will resume
its course in the morning and I sure hope so but anything can happen. As of
the middle of this afternoon, the Moorings was planning to let the Friday
charter starts go for sure - maybe even tomorrow's!
"Pier, Greg" <[email protected]> on 11/17/99 09:38:44 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Hutt <[email protected]>
cc: "Pier, Greg" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Viva VI!
AA is fine - St Thomas. All we need to do now is make sure there are
islands left to fly into.
Thanks,
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Taylor [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 8:00 PM
To: Bruce Hutt
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Viva VI!
It does make sense that there shouldn't be a problem with traveling
to the USVI;
since you have to clear immigration to get in there from the BVI I
wouldn't
expect to have to clear again when you go back to the mainland or
Puerto Rico.
We haven't spent much time sailing in the USVI so it would be an
exploratory
trip for us - not at all a bad thing. We can't get the boat to the
USVI till
Monday (charter doesn't start till noon on Sun. and there's tons of
work getting
all the food/drinks/ice etc. put away). Best bet is to pick Bruce
up in St.
John - Charlotte Amalie on St. Thomas is reputed to be a large, busy
commercial
port - a great place for yachts to play dodge-em with the cruise
ships (not
fun). There is regular ferry service from St. Thomas to St. John.
We won't be
there before noon on Monday.
I just got off the phone with Greg so hopefully AA can do the right
thing here!
"Bruce Hutt" <[email protected]> on 11/17/99 06:07:19 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Lenny
OK...guys the story is this:
I have just spent the entire day at Federal Plaza with the INS in
extremely
nasty conditions. Basically, I was not able to get hold of a travel
permit.
Vermont apparently has lost my documents including travel permit and
Federal
Plaza cannot step in. I cannot drive to Vermont, because they only
do
postal. I think I would feel slightly better had I known the
outcome at the
start of the day rather than at the end.
Anyway, to cut a long story short, I asked the question of whether I
could
goto the US Virgin Islands. The first answer was "no", so I
persisted and
the second answer was "yes; can I point you to the US in the US
Virgin
Islands", so feeling very patronised but having achieved something
for my
day at Federal Plaza I left.
We now have 3 choices:
1. Go to US VI......I definitely cannot go to BVI
2. Delay flight a couple of days and hope that travel permit
comes
through (which it should because my lawyer)
3. Got to USVI and get permit sent on if it comes through
G: Please can you see about changing my flights to the US VI. You
are
better at dealing with airlines than I am.....pretty please!
B
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Taylor <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; Bruce Hutt
<[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 6:49 PM
Subject: Lenny
>
>
>Here's the current forecast for Lenny. Shouldn't be a major
problem for
us but
>I feel for folks scheduled to go down there tomorrow and Thursday.
>
>Bruce - we're still keeping our fingers crossed that your permit
will come
>through. Are you sure you've got the right lawyer working on this?
Seems
like
>he ought to be able to shake it loose somehow. Anything at all we
can do
from
>here?
>
>(See attached file: track_LENNY.gif)
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Today Enron Broadband Services announced a 20-year exclusive agreement with
Blockbuster to deliver a revolutionary new "entertainment on demand" service
to consumers. Consumers will be able to order movies from the convenience
of their homes, and watch them on their televisions whenever they want. To
learn more about this exciting announcement and view a webcast featuring
interviews with Ken Lay and Blockbuster CEO John Antioco, visit
http://www.ebentertainmentondemand.com/. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi Dan,
I just got a call on a contract you routed to me at my old location. About
three weeks ago, my group moved to the 21st floor. Please send all
purchase/sale agreements to me at EB2127B and any processing/service
agreements to Sylvia Campos at EB2127A. Sorry if I neglected to inform you
earlier.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
SBR | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please take these meetings off my calendar. Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 05:46 PM
---------------------------
Lorraine Becker
01/12/2000 04:47 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretel Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E
Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elaine
Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathy McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia
Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine
Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale
Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rosalinda Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cherylene R Westbrook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Snow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kevin Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sue Foust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cliff
Lawrick/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Horn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Wiebe/CAL/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Future EOL Weekly Meetings
Please cancel all future EOL weekly meetings from your calendars. Should
you have any questions regarding EOL, please feel free to contact either the
Help Desk at x3-4357 or any of the Product Controls Group.
Thank you for your participation in previous meetings. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
My leg hurts still. This is what I'm taking
Lodine XL Tab 600MG - take 1 tab in the morning after my breakfeast snack
Cyclobenzaprine Tab 10MG - take 1 tab before going to bed | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Terri delivered Samuel (6 lbs. 4 oz.) and Benjamin (5 lbs. 2 oz.) on January
2. Attached is a photo taken the next day. Samuel is at right and Benjamin
at left.
- DSCN0037.JPG | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear Members:
NESA is pleased to be holding its 3rd Annual Benefit Golf Tournament on
Monday, March 18th, 2002 at the prestigious Champions Golf Club. Proceeds
will again benefit The Sunshine Kids Foundation.
This is your opportunity to secure a corporate ($2000) or individual ($500)
sponsorship which includes a foursome or a single tee time, respectively for
this outstanding tournament and great cause. Attached are registration
forms.
NESA has been proud to donate over $50,000 in the last two years to local
charities through this tournament, and we need your help to continue to do
so. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me or call me at
713/856-6525.
Don't forget about our mixer on Thursday, January 31st at the Boaka Bar
downtown. No cover, first drink free - can't beat it! RSVP to me if you can
make it. Visit their website for directions at
www.mercuryroom.com/boaka/boaka.html
TERESA A. KNIGHT
Vice President, Member Services
[email protected]
(713) 856-6525
Fax (713)856-6199
<<INVITE LETTER - INDIVIDUAL REGISTRATION FORM.doc>> <<INVITE LETTER -
SPONSOR REGISTRATION FORM.doc>>
- INVITE LETTER - INDIVIDUAL REGISTRATION FORM.doc
- INVITE LETTER - SPONSOR REGISTRATION FORM.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Barry, Attached is the form of assignment that we can use for assignment of
all the Transportation Agreement to ENA. Let me know if you have any
questions. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jana,
We have already contacted him.
Vince
From: Jana Giovannini 10/31/2000 08:55 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Becky Bruce/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Alison Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Kin Tso - UT Candidate for direct hire
Vince,
Just wanted to follow up on our conversation yesterday regarding Kin Tso.
Charlene actually called Kin yesterday to let him know that your group was
interested in him as a direct hire and would be contacting him this week. As
we discussed, Kin was told that his quantitative skills were a much better
fit for your group instead of our rotating Associate program. We let him
know that the Associate program would not be making him an offer but he is
being considered for a direct hire. Kin was receptive and is looking forward
to hearing from you. We will consider this issue closed from the Associate
and Analyst Program. We hope that you might find a direct hire fit for him
in your area. If you have any additional questions, please let me know.
Thanks so much. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
in keeping with your desire for periodic updates on developments here in
Europe, a summary of recent Belgian decrees. mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 06/11/2000
17:39 ---------------------------
Bruno Gaillard@ENRON
06/11/2000 15:25
To: Chris Presiaux/LON/ECT@ECT, Raphael Brun, Didier Magne/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Belgium: Electricity and gas markets: recent amendments
On 24 October 2000, six Royal Decrees on the liberalisation of the energy
(electricity and gas) market were published in the Official Gazette. Below is
a breif summary of the decrees
Electricity matters:
Eligibility of end users
Elegiblility consumption threashold:
currently 100 GWh, 20 GWh starting 31/12/00, 10 GWh starting 31/12/02
Distribution companies are elegible, for the volume of electricity supplied
to eligible clients within the distribution grid
Registration requirements:
Elegible customers must provide the competent minister with all relevant
information, such as the meter reading recording the supply of electricity
over the previous year, and an evaluation of consumption in the next year.
For 2000,customers must register by 23/11/00, these customers will be
elegible through 12/31/01
For all comming years, including 2001, customers must register by the 1st of
Febuary of that year
Resistration must be renewed every year. (An official registration form is
publish and will be available soon)
Management of the transmission grid
At least half the Board of Directors must be independent directors;
The Board of Directors constitutes a governance committee composed only of
independent directors. This committee,s object is to:
propose candidates for appointments as independent directors; and
examine conflicts of interest between the system operator and any of its
shareholders and report to the Board of Directors; and
rule on cases of conflicts of interest (managers and personnel); and
supervise the proper application of the Royal Decree.
The Management Board, constituted of independent members, is exclusively
competent for the technical operation of the network.
However, the system operator has yet to be appointed. The Council of
Ministers may make this appointment in the next few weeks (maybe on 10
November 2000). The guarantee to the right of access for the eligible
customers, is not yet in force and shall come into force only once the
appointment of the system operator is official.
Composition and functioning of the General Council of the CREG
The General Council of the CREG gives advice and recommendations on the
electricity and gas market at the request of the competent Minister, a
regional government or the executive body of the CREG.
The composition of the General Council has been amended to e.g. increase the
representation of public authorities, and allow producers of renewable energy
to be represented.
2. Gas Matters
A large part of the Act of 29 April 1999 on liberalising the gas market is
now in force. However, most provisions now in force only empower the King or
the competent Minister to issue (Royal) Decrees to implement the Gas Act.
Three provisions, in force since 24 October, may be singled out:
Electricity producers may buy the gas necessary to generate electricity,
whatever their consumption. However, the right of access to the network is
not yet in force (same problem as for the electricity market).
Conflicts on access to the gas network may be submitted to the GREG, which
has powers of conciliation and arbitration. An administrative court ("La
chambre d'Appel") will also be created to rule on this kind of conflict. A
Royal Decree regulating arbitration and the procedure in the administrative
court still has to be issued.
From the first financial year after 10 August 2000, Belgian companies that
generate, transport, deliver, supply, stock or buy gas, must comply with
Belgian accounting rules and keep separate books for activities of transport,
distribution and storage of gas.
Below please find the decrees in french. Please let me know if you want them
translated.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/EU/Enron on 06/11/2000
12:02 ---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: [email protected] 06/11/2000 10:59
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: RE: The liberalisation of the electricity and gas markets: recent
amendments
- EnronARR1.doc
- EnronARR2.doc
- EnronARR3.doc
- EnronARR4.doc
- EnronARR5.doc
- EnronARR6.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Actually, we girls have that built in guilt gene, it just improves with
age...but do I need to speak to your mother? Is there anything you would
like to confess...? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
An outstanding year!
2000, of course. It was extraordinary, by any measure.
How many years can you name that start with a great hoax -- Y2K -- and end
with a monumental hoot -- the world's greatest democracy can't get the hang
of how to elect a President?
We're not the only mad conspiratorialist to divine that the Y2K scare was the
brilliant handiwork of a cabal of top computer makers intent on sparking
sales -- and what a wildly successful scheme it was.
Few, however, are privy to the knowledge that the massive snafu of election
2000 was no improbable statistical fluke but the Machiavellian contrivance of
Ross Perot exacting revenge for being denied his usual place on the ballot.
Besides, it finally occurred to Ross that he wasn't going to be President,
and that made him as mad as a plucked rooster: If he wasn't going to be
President, by gum, nobody was going to be President!
Even though election 2000 demonstrated a small defect -- an inability to pick
a winner (but remember, nothing's perfect) -- it did put to rest some nasty
aspersions that have long been cast on the workings of this blessed republic.
Most particularly, it buried once and for all the cynical notion that money
can buy the Presidency. Both parties spent hundreds of millions of dollars
trying to do just that -- and came up empty.
So let's not hear any more nonsense about the Presidency being for sale. It's
now quite clear that the Presidency can't be bought; conceivably, though, it
can be stolen.
What remains to be determined is which of the pretenders can pull off the
theft. Mr. Bush would seem to enjoy a congenital advantage, since the
governor of the state whose votes ultimately will prove decisive is his baby
brother.
On the other hand, Al Gore has the overwhelming support and counsel of the
trial lawyers. Trial lawyers, after all, make a profession of knowing how to
get away with murder. So they should find figuring out how to snatch the
Presidency mere child's play.
Not the least remarkable thing about this most remarkable year is that the
Supreme Court seemingly has abandoned its long tradition of following the
election returns in favor of helping to shape them. The good part is that
there are nine of them-seven mostly old men and two women of a certain
age-assuring a majority ruling, unless one recuses himself because he simply
can't stand Florida.
Only in America in the year 2000.
-- As you're undoubtedly and possibly painfully aware, 2000 is already
memorable in Wall Street as the year the air began to whoosh out of the
monster stock-market bubble and, after many a frustrating try, the year the
bears finally ate Goldilocks.
In fact, unless such portents as mounting claims for unemployment insurance
and the latest downbeat readings on business from the purchasing managers are
completely misleading, 2000 will go down as the beginning of the end of the
most salutary and long-lived economic boom to grace this nation (and probably
any other).
These are, admittedly, negative distinctions. But if you're a year and want
to be famous, you can't be picky: No one harks back to 1929 because it was a
great year for butterflies.
Nasdaq unarguably has turned in a once-in-a-lifetime performance this year.
Never before has a stock-market index caused as much pain in so short a time
as did Nasdaq in its breathtaking (and wealth-evaporating) 50% drop from its
March high to its close last Thursday. What's more, it has a full month to
better (worsen?) that fantastic feat.
Nor does the plunge in the index -- formidable as it is -- do full justice to
the awesome decline. A much more graphic picture is painted by the slides in
individual issues. Here, we're indebted to a sometime correspondent named
Howard Boyet, who sent us a list of 90 of the most gruesome casualties. Alas,
space -- and solicitude for those readers of an especially delicate
disposition -- prevent us from listing the entire wretched roster. But a
sampling will give you the flavor.
For instance, Foundry Networks, which peaked at 212, was last seen at around
41. Harmonic has fallen from 158 to 7-plus. Internet Capital from 212 to 6.
FreeMarkets, from 370 to 29.50 (not quite free yet, but it's getting there).
VA Linux, from 320 to 8. Red Hat, 151 to 6. Inktomi, 241 to 24. DoubleClick,
135 to 13. Akamai, 346 to 27. Next Level, 202 to 11 (we dread to contemplate
the stock's next level). MicroStrategy, 333 to 12 (might be something wrong
with the strategy). Ask Jeeves, 144 to 10 (if it's all the same, we'd rather
not ask him). And on and drearily on.
So if you own stocks like Dell Computer (60 to 18) or Gateway (81 to 19) or
Texas Instruments (100 to 37) or Oracle (46 to 26), you can take some comfort
in the knowledge that you could have owned any of the above or the likes of
Razorfish (57 to 3), Novell (44 to 6) or Covad (67 to 2).
These exercises are now commonplace, and journalistically, we suppose,
they're the equivalent of a circus freak show. But they do, as Mr. Boyet
suggests, provide a more vivid and even more accurate description of the
damage wrought.
What we've found most intriguing is that, until now, all this blood in the
Street has evoked very little public outcry. We've experienced a kind of
cruel and vast but silent mugging. Magazines like Time and Newsweek haven't
done their usual heavy-breathing treatments, nor have most newspapers,
including the New York Times, made a front-page fuss about the decline and
fall of Nasdaq. Nor are the networks running their usual inane specials.
Moreover, until quite recently, mutual-fund shareholders have placidly
watched their wealth withering. No crowds gathering in front of fund
headquarters and, more tellingly, no rush to redeem their holdings.
There are several possible explanations for this rather astonishing
diffidence on the part of the financially wounded and the absence of hysteria
in the press, both the electronic version and the genuine item. The
distraction of the election that never ends. The fact that most everyone who
wants one still has a job and a relatively high comfort level. Whatever the
cause or combination of causes, that we're in a bear market, and a vicious
one, doesn't seem to have sunk in yet.
Until it does and until fear stalks the Street and an ugly grizzly makes the
cover of Time, if you run into anyone claiming to espy a bottom, take him
firmly by the hand and guide him to the nearest ophthalmologist.
-- That chart adorning this page depicts another reason why there's lots of
room still on the downside. (See accompanying illustration -- Barron's Dec.
4, 2000) It comes to us courtesy of George Gilman, the savvy and talented
producer of the Business Picture, a wonderful quarterly compilation of charts
and info on the economy and the markets.
The last official number for the Nasdaq P/E, he reports, was 139.1 for
October, but he reckons the figure fell to somewhere around 107 by the end of
November.
As George comments: "Even after the 48.5% decline from the March 10 peak of
5048.62 to Thursday's close of 2597.93, the P/E on Nasdaq is incredibly high."
And that's the point. The multiple wouldn't be cheap at half its current
level. Nor would it shock us if, eventually, Nasdaq and its P/E fell another
50%.
-- While we're convinced we're in the early stages of a secular bear market,
we know there'll be blips in this descent just as there were dips in the late
great bull market.
In truth, we're surprised we haven't had a halfway decent rebound yet.
Certainly, we're overdue for one. Consider this a heads-up on what might
trigger a bounce (apart from a miraculous resolution to the election snarl).
Next Tuesday, Alan Greenspan is slated to deliver the keynote address to a
gathering of commmunity bankers in New York City (which is not overrun by
community banks but is a great place to visit). We haven't a clue as to what
he intends to say, and it might well be nothing intelligible.
But should Mr. G make a sly reference to the economy and monetary policy and
hint that maybe the Fed is poised to shift from tight to neutralthat just
could rouse spirits in Wall Street enough to ignite a fairly brisk -- if
relatively brief -- move up.
-- John Liscio died last week. John was our colleague at Barron's for roughly
a half-dozen years in the late 'Eighties and early 'Nineties, and not a day
went by that he didn't light up the place.
He was vibrant and funny, outrageous and irreverent, extraordinarily
intelligent. He was brash and tough and had an insatiable appetite for
mischief. Yet he was also warmly affectionate, shirt-off-his-back generous
and, oddly, possessed of a touching ingenuousness.
John had an expansive mind that ranged restlessly and relentlessly over just
about every subject known to literate and inquiring man and a few that only
his special imagination provided entry to. He was a baseball nut, a
cantankerous pitcher for and captain of Barron's softball team and a demon
participant in the Fantasy League, where grown men play at being
owner-managers of major-league teams. In fact, he was the commissioner of his
league (in which role, we can only surmise, he visited great anguish on his
fellow Fantasy Leaguers).
As a writer, John was exceptional. He brought to economics and markets a
knowledge not only of those murky subjects but also of the wide world; a
gifted and fluent pen and a sense of humor that could be -- inevitably was --
deliciously wicked. He would leap with positive glee on some unfortunate with
a tempting name. There was a chap named LaWare at the Fed, for example, whom
John inevitably and with some purpose called UnaWare. Morgan Stanley
economist Stephen Roach was rarely mentioned by John but as the proprietor of
the Roach Motel, where the facts check in but don't check out.
He was a brilliant journalist, both at Barron's and at U.S. News, and,
against all advice and odds, launched an economic newsletter, the Liscio
Report, which became a roaring success. The reason was simply that John had
more wit in one pinky and more insight in the other than any dozen economists.
John, who was spunk personified, showed unbelievable courage as he battled
his last illness. When we visited him in his hospital room and told him
joshingly he looked like hell, he grinned that indomitable grin of his and
launched into a couple of hours of dissertation on the state of the world,
excitedly detailing his plans for the future.
He was the most indomitable person we've ever met. All of us here at Barron's
and, for that matter, anyone lucky enough to have known him, will miss him
terribly. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Louise,
The iBuyit approval level updates you are requesting for Enron Americas are nearing completion and will be ready to be migrated into production on Friday. We have taken a shot at drafting a proposed communication for your consideration in advising your employees of the changes.
Please advise if you would need any assistance in distributing the communications. Additionally, can you please confirm your approval to migrate the changes into production on Friday.
Thanks
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Roberts, Angela
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Gillespie, John
Subject: Enron Americas Spend Approval Guidelines | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Just wanted to pass along a conversation I had recently with a senior
Treasury Department official about Ken Lay. My former colleague is
extremely savvy and a leading thinker on the financial markets. He pointed
out that with Jack Welch's retirement in late 2001 there will be a very large
void in the corporate community. Welch, for many years, has been considered
in the financial markets and public at large, as the preeminent CEO figure in
corporate America. He is, in essence, the spokesperson and symbol of this
community. With his departure, there will be a process to figure out who
steps in these shoes, and my Treasury friend believes there are only about a
handful of CEOs in the running. He believes Ken is in this group. You've
probably thought about this or you may want to put this email in the "for
what it is worth" pile. I believe that this is worth further thought. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
As I never used them - when do they get refunded - we then need to net off on expenses and reclaim the family ones.
Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel: 713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom May/Corp/Enron on 05/11/2001 03:45 PM
---------------------------
Thane Twiggs@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/10/2001 08:24 PM
To: Smith L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
May/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject:
Today the Protocol Review Subcommittee passed unanimously a revision request
that will allow ercot to grant "provisional authorization" to QSE to provide
ancillary services for a period of 90 days while any deficiencies in the
certification can be corrected. The request will be sent to the TAC where it
will have an e-mail vote and I would not anticipate any opposition.
To receive the "provisional authorization" the QSE needs to have performed an
Ancillary Services qualification test in good faith but failed to qualify due
to problems that in the opinion of ERCOT, are noncritical for providing one
or more ancillary services. My understanding is that Frontera has not had
the primary test. According to John Adams at ERCOT four have been scheduled
and subsequently cancelled. It will be critical to schedule and complete the
test to be considered for the "provisional authorization".
I spoke with John Adams regarding staffing to help perform the qualification
tests and he said that they would be able to do the certification tests at
about any time without any major scheduling delays. The only time when they
would not be able to do the tests would be when ESCA will take control of the
systems to perform cut-over operations.
Thane Thomas Twiggs
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-3199 Voice
713-408-4463 Mobile
713-646-8272 Fax
877-968-8967 Digital Pager or [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I asked scott and hedy to fill ken in on the change for this week. looks like ball got dropped. poor ken.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 12:51 PM
To: 'Ken Smith'
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Is there a call today
Sorry, Ken. SOmeone was supposed to call you yesterday. I believe we're going to 9 am Wed weekly calls. We'll be setting up a call-in number for it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Smith [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:48 AM
To: Scott Govenar; Susan J Mara; Jeff Dasovich
Subject: Is there a call today
Is there a conference call today? I couldn't get into yesterday's call; the code didn't work and the operator had no other record of a call. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is one more.
----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 10:06 AM -----
Tyrell Harrison@ENRON
03/15/2001 10:05 AM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Counterparty
Gerald,
Here is a new counterparty, one more to follow:
Cannon Interests-Houston
11511 Rain Tree Circle
Houston, TX 77024
Fax: 713-706-4319
Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please review attached at your leisure.? This has not been reviewed by
outside counsel or internally at InterGen, so it is being transmitted subject
to comment from all interested participants.
<<Enron guar.doc>>
- Enron guar.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I discussed the numbers with Vince and we have the sign off from him. So,
Vera and Shirley, you can go ahead to execute the adjustment.
Thanks,
Krishna.
Kimberly Watson@ENRON
12/06/2000 02:07 PM
To: Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vera Apodaca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Corporate Allocation from Enron Research Group
Krishna,
Attached is a spreadsheet with the figures we discussed earlier. For
July-Dec, ETS will keep half of the amount allocated (equivalent to 1.5
employees, $135.6) from the corporate allocations to ETS. If this looks OK
to you, I would like to have Vera work with Shirley to handle the accounting
adjustment similar to mid year. Many thanks, Kim.
Vera,
Here is the Year 2000 spreadsheet. As you will see, we will need to work
with Shirley Crenshaw (X35290) with Enron Research Group to coordinate a
similar accounting adjustment to the one we made mid year. I will send the
Year 2001 Budgeted spreadsheet to you in the next few days (just in case it
changes with the approval of the science workorder). Please call me if you
have any questions about this spreadsheet. Thanks, Kim. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mr. Lay:
For most of Enron employees, November 9th will go down as one of the most tragic days of our lives. We are not ready to give up on Enron and have its name disappear from the world. On a personal level, I can handle the financial loss as I invested everything(including my 401k) into Enron because I believed in it. I will now be working till I die which I do not mind. What I mind the most is to have Enron's name diappear. Please tell us if there is anything we can do to keep our baby alive. I am willing to sacrifice whatever I have for this.
Regards,
Nasim Khan
---------------------- Forwarded by Nasim H Khan/TRANSREDES on 11/11/2001 09:03 PM ---------------------------
Nasim H Khan
10/28/2001 12:26 AM
To: Kenneth Lay/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: May God Bless you and your family- We are with you
Mr. Lay:
In view of the events of past weeks surrounding Enron's stock, I am taking the liberty of writing this note to you. I will try to keep this brief. First of all, I want to say that you are doing a terrific job. With your leadership we will turn this around soon. May God bless you and your family so you can continue leading this great company out of this crisis. I have been with the company for almost 21 years. I remember the difficult days that we have been through during this time . Particularly I remember like yesterday when I used to be in Omaha and you came there and, talked to all of us and gave us hope and your commitment to turn things around in those uncertain and difficult days after the merger and promised to make this a great company. We all rallied behind you and we turned this company into one of the greatest company in the world. We are with you now, and with your leadership we will turn this around again. For most of us, Enron is not just a place to work. It is part of us. It is our family. It is our life. In the current situation the pain we feel is the same as if one of our loved one was seriously sick and we did not know what to do except to follow the advise of the doctor. We will follow your advise and give you our 200% . On a personal level for me this a very emotional and painful time. I have grown with this company that has given me great opportunities. Currently I am working in Bolivia as president of Gas TransBoliviano and feel perhaps there is something I should be doing to help in this situation. Mr. Lay, If there is anything I can do above and beyond my current job, please let me know. You have my commitment and I will not disappoint you. Please consider me like one of those guys in NY showing up with shovels to help after the WTC disaster. I am hoping that I will be called upon. Again, may God bless you and your family. Look forward to seeing you in San Antonio.
With Kind Regards,
Nasim Khan | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is the Global Standards report for 12/28/00. If you have any
questions please call me at ext 54751.
Nancy
Happy New Year. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Carolyn:
Thanks. I'll let you know where shortly.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
[email protected]
Carolyn George@ENRON
12/04/00 03:35 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Lunch with Julia and Kristina
The 12th and the 19th work for Julia. Robin and I spoke earlier today, and
we both have the 12th scheduled for lunch with you.
Please let me know if this does not work.
Hope everything is well with you and your family.
Carolyn George
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron North America - Legal
1400 Smith, EB3836A
Houston, TX 77002
(713) 853-3439 Fax: (713) 646-3393
email: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Your resume is with several persons in different areas of E. Should you
receive a call let me know, so I can tell you more about these
positions. I am trying to find a close match for your skills.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 4:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: WEEKEND/LATE DUTY CONTACTS-CUSTOMER SERVICES
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
JUNE 07, 2001
Notice ID: 2784
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED
SUBJECT: WEEKEND/LATE DUTY CONTACTS-CUSTOMER SERVICES
Individuals from the following teams will be on duty (from 8:00 a.m. until
10:00 p.m.) in Customer Services on Saturday, June 9 and Sunday, June 10,
2001:
NOMINATIONS & CONFIRMATIONS
Team 3 304-357-3701
Team 5 (Sunday only) 304-357-3705
Individuals from Team 1 (Evening Shift) will be on duty (from 2:00 p.m. to
10:00 p.m.) next week (June 11 through
June 15):
NOMINATIONS & CONFIRMATIONS
Team 1 304-357-3708
Please note that the Columbia Navigator system is unavailable every Sunday from
11:00 p.m. until Monday at 6:00 a.m. for routine system maintenance.
If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
APRIL 13, 2001: We have received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and
Sale Agreement dated 4/10/01 from the referenced CP. Copies will be
distributed to Legal and Credit. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Got a voicemail from Rob Walls. They are (have been) looking into it. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Tickets were issued per your request.
AGENT LO/LO BOOKING REF YXIWYY
THOLT/JOSEPH
THOLT/JANE
EB 37TH FLOOR
ENRON CORP YELLOW COPY TO LAURA
ENRON CORP ETKT RECEIPT
1400 SMITH /C/O THOLT/JANE
HOUSTON TX 77002
DATE: MAY 07 2001
SERVICE DATE FROM TO DEPART ARRIVE
DELTA AIR LINES 20JUN HOUSTON TX SALT UT 815A 1014A
DL 1647 K WED G.BUSH INTERCO SALT LAKE CITY
NON SMOKING TERMINAL A TERMINAL 2
SNACK NON STOP
RESERVATION CONFIRMED 2:59 DURATION
AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
SEAT 22C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED THOLT/JOSEPH(ID
DELTA AIR LINES 20JUN SALT UT HELENA MT 1100A 135P
DL 473 K WED SALT LAKE CITY
NON SMOKING TERMINAL 2
1 STOP
RESERVATION CONFIRMED 2:35 DURATION
SALT UT GREAT FALLS MT
AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
GREAT FALLS MT HELENA MT
AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
SEAT 28C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED
DELTA AIR LINES 30JUN HELENA MT SALT UT 215P 332P
DL 473 K SAT SALT LAKE CITY
NON SMOKING TERMINAL 2
NON STOP
RESERVATION CONFIRMED 1:17 DURATION
AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
SEAT 21D NO SMOKING CONFIRMED THOLT/JOSEPH(ID
DELTA AIR LINES 30JUN SALT UT HOUSTON TX 435P 848P
DL 1180 K SAT SALT LAKE CITY G.BUSH INTERCO
NON SMOKING TERMINAL 2 TERMINAL A
SNACK NON STOP
RESERVATION CONFIRMED 3:13 DURATION
AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
SEAT 22C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED THOLT/JOSEPH(ID
MISCELLANEOUS 28OCT HOUSTON TX
SUN ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **
RESERVATION NUMBER(S) DL/1VC00J
THOLT/JOSEPH S5C0413R1073
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
THIS IS A NON-REFUNDABLE FARE THAT REQUIRES
TRAVEL ON THESE SPECIFIC DATES AND FLIGHTS.
ANY CHANGES WILL RESULT IN A PENALTY AND/OR
ADDITIONAL COLLECTION.
HIS IS THE PASSENGER RECEIPT FOR YOUR ELECTRONIC TICKET.
PLEASE CHECK-IN WITH PHOTO IDENTIFICATION AND WITH
EITHER (1) THIS RECEIPT OR (2) YOUR CONFIRMATION NUMBER.
YOUR ETKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: 1VC00J
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED
Laura Osman
Travel Agency in the Park
713-860-1124
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Review and approve for accuracy
Looks good. Please book this. Thank you. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Carol: Below is the list of items I'll be handling. You can send to me.
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2001 09:04 AM -----
Sara Shackleton
04/25/2001 06:26 PM
To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron
cc:
Subject: Reassignment of ISDA Master Agreements
Mary/Cheryl:
Carol has seven (7) master swap agreements to be reassigned. Cheryl and I
will work on these together. All appear on the legal/credit list.
(1) Cross Timbers Oil Company
(2) Camden Property Trust
(3) Clorox Company (The)
(4) Montana Power Comopany (The)
(5) Ocean Energy, Inc.
(6) Quebecor World USA, Inc.
(7) Russel Metals Inc.
Mary: Would you please reassign paralegals to Cross Timbers and Quebecor?
These were handled by Samantha. Maybe Marie could assist; these don't appear
to be urgent.
Thanks.
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
here it is!!
-----Original Message-----
From: St Clair, Carol
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:13 PM
To: Redmond, Brian; Gray, Barbara; Rohauer, Tanya; Koehler, Anne
Cc: Hunter, Larry Joe
Subject: AEP Confirm
Enclosed is a sample confirm between ENA and AEP in which I have added
language on the second page that removes the transaction from the margin
calculation.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 2; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042702.txt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
=================================================================
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES' CLICK 'N SAVE E-MAIL UPDATE
February 19, 2002
Ever notice how there's always someone going somewhere?
Ever wonder why it's always someone else and not you?
Ever think that maybe it's your turn to take a break?
Why wait? Get packing and get going somewhere.
It's your turn.
=================================================================
IMPORTANT TRAVEL INFORMATION
=================================================================
To get the lastest information including airport arrival times
and curbside luggage checkin please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/travelAdvisory.html
=================================================================
THIS WEEK'S SPECIALS
=================================================================
1. It's Your Turn for $39 - $99 One-Way Systemwide
2. southwest.com Featured Destination: New Orleans, LA
3. Friends Fly Free - Long Island/Islip, NY to/from Providence, RI
4. New! Great Rates on hotels
5. Southwest Airlines Vacations Offer
6. Subscriber Information
=================================================================
IT'S YOUR TURN FOR $39 - $99 ONE-WAY SYSTEMWIDE
=================================================================
Travel on all published, scheduled service.
$39 - $99 one-way for travel Tuesday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
$44 - $119 one-way for travel on Monday, Thursday, Friday, and
Sunday.
This week's Internet Specials are available systemwide on
published, scheduled service.
*****************************************************************
Here are just a few examples of the Internet Specials available.
If your city is not listed please visit Reservations on
southwest.com to check for more Internet Specials by travel date.
*****************************************************************
Fares listed are available for travel on Tuesday, Wednesday, or
Saturday. Fares may be higher for travel on Monday, Thursday,
Friday, or Sunday.
Albany, NY
$39 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Albuquerque, NM
$99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
$89 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$39 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
Amarillo, TX
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Austin, TX
$45 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
$39 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
$39 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
$39 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
$39 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH
$39 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
$69 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
$99 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
$39 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
$78 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$39 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
Birmingham, AL
$39 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
$39 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Boise, ID
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$39 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
$39 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA
Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
$39 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Burbank, CA
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$46 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
Chicago Midway, IL
$39 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$99 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
$44 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
Cleveland, OH
$39 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Corpus Christi, TX
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Dallas Love Field, TX
$45 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
$44 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
$76 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Detroit, MI
$39 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$51 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
El Paso, TX
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
$39 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
$39 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Houston Hobby, TX
$99 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
$39 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
$99 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
$99 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
$44 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
$99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
$89 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
$56 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Indianapolis, IN
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Jacksonville, FL
$69 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
$39 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
$62 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Kansas City, MO
$99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Las Vegas, NV
$39 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$39 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
$39 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
Little Rock, AR
$99 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Long Island/Islip, NY
$39 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Los Angeles, CA
$89 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
$99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
$99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
$39 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$46 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
$39 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
$45 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
Louisville, KY
$39 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Lubbock, TX
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Manchester, NH
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Midland/Odessa, TX
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Nashville, TN
$39 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
$53 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
$89 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
$56 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
New Orleans, LA
$99 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
$99 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
$99 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
$99 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
$78 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
$39 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
$99 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
$99 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
$99 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
$99 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
$99 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH
$99 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
$99 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
$76 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
$99 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
$99 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
$99 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
$99 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
$99 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
$56 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
$99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
$62 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
$99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
$99 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
$99 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
$99 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
$99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
$99 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY
$99 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX
$99 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
$99 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
$56 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
$98 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
$99 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
$99 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
$99 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
$99 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA
$69 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL
$99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
$99 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
$99 one-way, to/from Providence, RI
$98 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC
$99 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
$99 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA
$99 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT
$88 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX
$99 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
$99 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
$99 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
$99 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
$69 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL
$99 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ
$99 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK
$99 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL
Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
$39 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
$98 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$48 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL
Oakland, CA
$46 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
$46 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$55 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
$59 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
Oklahoma City, OK
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Omaha, NE
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$39 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
Ontario, CA
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Orlando, FL
$69 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$48 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
Phoenix, AZ
$39 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
$39 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
$39 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Portland, OR
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$55 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
$54 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
Providence, RI
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Raleigh-Durham, NC
$98 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Reno/Tahoe, NV
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Sacramento, CA
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Salt Lake City, UT
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
San Antonio, TX
$88 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
San Diego, CA
$39 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$53 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
$45 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$54 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
$53 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
Seattle/Tacoma, WA
$39 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
$99 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$59 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
$39 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA
Spokane, WA
$39 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
$39 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
St. Louis, MO
$44 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
$51 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$39 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
Tampa Bay, FL
$69 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$39 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL
Tucson, AZ
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
Tulsa, OK
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
West Palm Beach, FL
$99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
$39 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL
For complete information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/hotfares2.html#swide?src=e021902
=================================================================
IMPORTANT DETAILS
=================================================================
*Available only on southwest.com.
*7-day advance purchase required.
*Available on published, scheduled service.
*Fares shown are one-way and do not include federal
excise tax of up to $3.00 for each flight segment.
(a segment is defined as a takeoff and landing)
*Fares do not include airport-assessed passenger facility
charges (PFC) of up to $9 and government-imposed September 11th
Security Fee of up to $5 one-way.
*Fares are nonrefundable, but (except for tickets
purchased through our Group Tickets Program)
may be applied toward future travel on Southwest Airlines.
*Travel February 26, 2002 through August 3, 2002,
except May 24 and 27, and July 7, 2002.
*Purchase through February 28, 2002, midnight Pacific Time.
*Fares are available one-way or can be combined
with other fare types. Most restrictive rules of combined
fares will apply.
*Penalty applies to any changes made after purchasing
Southwest Internet Specials.
*Orange County, CA and Houston Intercontinental, TX are
not included in this sale.
For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml?src=e021902
=================================================================
FEATURED DESTINATION
=================================================================
This week's Featured Destination:
New Orleans, LA
Sponsored by New Orleans Metropolitan Convention and
Visitors Bureau.
This week features air fare specials plus great deals on
hotels and rental cars.
For information on this destination, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares3.shtml?src=e021902
=================================================================
FRIENDS FLY FREE
=================================================================
Long Island/Islip, NY to/from Providence, RI for $49 each way
and bring a friend for FREE!
*Travel February 22, 2002 through August 3, 2002.
*Purchase February 19, 2002 through May 23, 2002, midnight
Pacific Time.
*Fare is each way with roundtrip purchase.
*Fare does not include a federal excise tax of $3.00 per takeoff
and landing for the fare-paying Customer.
*Fare does not include airport-assessed passenger facility
charges (PFC) of $6 and government-imposed September 11th
Security Fee of up to $5 roundtrip, per person.
For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/fff.html?src=e021902
=================================================================
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
=================================================================
Additional information you need to know about all of our
air fare specials:
*Changes to any portion of the reservation
(flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel may be purchased online using
either a credit card or by utilizing funds from a
previously unused or cancelled Ticketless
Travel reservation(s). Funds from up to four cancelled
or unused Ticketless Travel reservation records can
be combined to purchase a new Ticketless Travel
reservation record. Southwest Airlines travel credit
travel vouchers, gift certificates, and discount coupons)
may not be used as forms of payment for
Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.
*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
flights that operate during very busy travel times
and holiday periods such as Presidents Day and Memorial Day.
*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
full unrestricted fare.
=================================================================
NEW! GREAT RATES ON HOTELS
=================================================================
Looking for Great Rates on hotels?
Here are just a few of the Great Rates offered in the new Special
Offers section in the southwest.com Travel Center.
*LaQuinta Inn and Suites, San Antonio, TX
Rates from $60 per night
*Silver Legacy Resort Casino, Reno, NV
Rates from $49 per night
*LaQuinta Inn and Suites, Addison, TX
Rates from $50
*Baymont Inn and Suites, Salt Lake City, UT
Rates from $59 per night
*Bahia Resort Hotel, San Diego, CA
Rates from $95 per night
For more Great Rates and complete details visit the new
Special Offers section in the southwest.com Travel Center at
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/great_rates.html?src=e021902
=================================================================
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES VACATIONS OFFER
=================================================================
Discover your wild side in Las Vegas! Purchase a complete
air/hotel Southwest Airlines Vacations package to the City of
Lights and you'll save $25 per person. This special offer is
valid for bookings made by February 21, 2002!
For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/hotfares_other.html?src=e021902
=================================================================
SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION
=================================================================
Please pass this great news on to your friends.
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail
Updates, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/
Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save E-mail Updates.
For administration of your e-mail subscription, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/emailUnsubscribe.html
=================================================================
You may retrieve and print a copy of your Southwest
Airlines Ticketless Travel at:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/retrieveItinerary.html
Questions about your flight arrival or departure time?
Please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/cgi-bin/selectFlight
=================================================================
This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.
Copyright 2002 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.
---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: [email protected]
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email/ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Per Mr. Steven Kean, of Enron Corp. please see below ( Appendix C - Order 888
"Allegations of Public Utilities Exercising Transmission
Dominance).
APPENDIX C
Allegations of Public Utilities Exercising Transmission Dominance
I. Examples From Proceedings Before Administrative Law Judges
These are examples of allegations that various public
utilities have refused to provide comparable service, either
through refusals to wheel, dilatory tactics that so protracted
negotiations as to effectively deny wheeling, refusals to provide
service priority equal to native load, or refusals to provide
service flexibility equivalent to the utility's own use.
A. American Electric Power Service Corp. (AEP)
In 1993, AEP filed, on behalf of its public utility
associate companies, an open access tariff that offered only firm
point-to-point service with very limited flexibility. It did not
offer network service, flexible point-to-point service, or non-
firm service. Thus, it did not provide customers with the same
flexibility that AEP itself has. Nor did it provide a service
priority equivalent to that enjoyed by native load. The
Commission set AEP's tariff for hearing and, on rehearing, held
that in order not to be unduly discriminatory, the tariff had to
offer comparable service. American Electric Power Service Corp.,
64 FERC 4 61,279 (1993), reh'g, 67 FERC 4 61,168 (1994).
At hearing, Raj Rao of Indiana Michigan Power Agency (IMPA)
(Ex. IMPA-1, Feb 23, 1994) and Kenneth Hegemann of American
Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc. (AMP-Ohio) (Ex. AMPO-1, Feb 23, 1994),
both senior management officials, testified concerning AEP's
,
- 2 -
alleged discriminatory practices. 1/ AMP-Ohio is an
association of municipalities in Ohio, some of whose members
depend on AEP for transmission and partial requirements service.
IMPA is an association of municipalities in Indiana, and many of
IMPA's loads are captive to the AEP transmission system. The
witnesses alleged as follows:
1. In anticipation of high peak demands, AEP would
contract for large blocks of available short-term power,
withhold sale of short-term power, refuse to transmit third
party short-term power, and require purchases from AEP at
the emergency rate (100 mill/kwh) when an emergency might
not exist. Ex. AMPO-1 at 6.
2. In December 1989, AMP-Ohio negotiated a 20 MW
purchase of short-term power from Louisville Gas & Electric
Company (LG&E). AEP refused to wheel because LG&E had
earlier that day told AEP it had no power to sell to AEP.
AEP then bought the power from LG&E and offered to resell it
to AMP-Ohio. Ex. AMPO-1 at 6-7.
3. In January 1990, AMP-Ohio solicited bids for
February power purchases from a number of utilities
including AEP. AEP was not the winning bid. AMP-Ohio made
arrangements to purchase the power from four winning bidders
and sought transmission through AEP. When AMP-Ohio gave AEP
1/ After the Rehearing Order expanding the scope of the
proceeding, AMP-Ohio and IMPA withdrew this testimony as no
longer necessary. This withdrawal does not change the fact
that the testimony was sworn to under oath.
,
- 3 -
the schedule for delivery, AEP refused to transmit the
power, matched the average price of the winning bids, and
made the sale itself. Ex. AMPO-1 at 7.
4. In August 1993, an AMP-Ohio member (Columbus, Ohio)
was purchasing 10 MW of hourly non-displacement power from
AEP and, after AEP raised its price to 60 mills/kwh, sought
another source for the next hour. Consumers Power Company
and Detroit Edison Company both offered non-displacement
power at 40 mills. AEP refused to transmit, saying it had a
600 MW unit out and could not resell power from another
source. 2/ Columbus cancelled the transaction and had to
buy 10 MW of power from AEP at 100 mills/kwh. Ex. AMPO-1 at
7-8.
5. In July 1993, two AMP-Ohio members (Columbus and
St. Mary's) had been buying hourly non-displacement power
from AEP when the price rose to 35 mills. Dayton Power &
Light Company (DP&L) offered to sell at 23 mills and AEP
agreed to transmit for one hour. But for the next hour, AEP
said it had problems with its system, refused to transmit
the power, kept the power from DP&L for itself and offered
to sell power to AMP-Ohio for Columbus and St. Mary's at 100
2/ AEP generally limited its offer of short-term transmission
to buy/sell transactions; that is, AEP would buy the power
from the seller and resell it to the purchaser.
Supplemental testimony of AEP Witness Baker (Ex. A-73) at
27-29. Often, the terms of the buy/sell transaction
required transmission dependent utilities (TDUs) to maintain
reserves and meet contractual commitments for at least a
year. Id.
,
- 4 -
mills. Columbus increased its local generation, but St.
Mary's purchased 8 MW at 100 mills. For the next hour, AMP-
Ohio arranged with DP&L for another 8 MW, hoping AEP would
transmit under the 24 hour buy-sell agreement. AEP did
transmit this power. Seven hours later in the day, St.
Mary's Greenup Hydro project power was available and the 8
MW from DP&L was no longer needed. If St. Mary's had been
receiving the hourly power that AEP had refused to transmit,
St. Mary's could have switched to Greenup power. But
because AMP-Ohio had changed to daily service, St. Mary's
had to pay a demand charge for the entire day, even though
it used the power only 7 hours and would have paid less
under the hourly rate. Ex. AMPO-1 at 8-9.
6. In January 1994, AMP-Ohio sought to transfer power
from one member with generation to other members, which
required transmission over AEP and Toledo Edison lines.
Toledo Edison said yes, AEP said no. AMP-Ohio's northern
members purchased emergency power from Toledo Edison. AMP-
Ohio then reminded AEP that it had agreed not to deny
transmission and AEP agreed to transmit. Ex. AMPO-1 at 9.
7. IMPA arranged to buy 80 MW of short-term power from
LG&E and have it wheeled, using buy-sell arrangements,
through Public Service Company of Indiana (PSI) and AEP to
serve IMPA's load at Richmond (an IMPA member). The
delivered price was $.292 per kW-day plus a 1 mill adder.
At the same time AEP arranged to buy 300 MW from PSI at $.30
,
- 5 -
per kW day plus out-of-pocket energy costs. Hence, PSI was
shipping a total of 380 MW to AEP with 80 MW of that amount
to be delivered to IMPA's load at Richmond. Then, on a day
when IMPA should have received the 80 MW, AEP told IMPA that
PSI had sold everything to AEP and that IMPA would have to
buy from AEP at $.63 per kW day plus the cost of energy from
AEP. IMPA purchased from AEP under protest. AEP used its
control over transmission to intercept the 80 MW at a lower
price and resell it as short-term power to IMPA. AEP
claimed that PSI had terminated its sales to AEP on that
day. But the 80 MW was independent of PSI's other sales to
AEP and would not have been interrupted if AEP had not
interrupted it. IMPA-1 at 7.
8. IMPA has combustion turbines owned by and located
at one member, which IMPA would like to connect to the Joint
Transmission System owned by IMPA, CINergy and Wabash Valley
Power Association. To do so, IMPA needed a metering
agreement with AEP, to which AEP would not agree. IMPA-1 at
6.
9. In January 1994, IMPA had power to sell from its
turbines when AEP and others needed power. IMPA offered
power to AEP but AEP it said could not purchase the power
without an existing contract. Moreover, since there was no
short-term tariff, IMPA could not sell the power to another
utility. IMPA-1 at 6.
10. Another example of the utility engaging in
,
- 6 -
dilatory tactics that raised the customer's transaction
costs and effectively denied transmission is the "sham
transaction" provision proposed by AEP. As filed, AEP's
tariffs permitted it to deny service merely because a
portion of the transmitted power might be used to serve a
former retail customer of AEP. See, e.g., Ex. BR&WVP-1 (J.
Bertram Solomon testimony, February 23, 1994). (As part of
a settlement AEP filed the pro forma tariff and withdrew
this provision.)
11. Finally, AEP's originally filed tariff contained a
"prodigal customer" provision. Under this provision,
transmission customers who sought to convert back to
requirements service had to give AEP five years' notice, in
which case AEP and the customer would enter into
negotiations to determine whether AEP will provide service
at all and if so under what rate, terms, and conditions.
Ex. S-39 at 1 (Staff testimony). AEP did not require notice
from all new customers, only from prodigal customers. Id.
at 2. That a potential customer was previously served by
AEP is not a reason to treat the customer differently. (AEP
withdrew this provision when it filed the pro forma tariff.)
B. Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy)
Entergy filed a partial settlement largely adopting the NOPR
pro forma tariffs except for two provisions (headroom and
ancillary services). Because the settlement predated the filing
date for customer testimony before the ALJ, the customers did not
,
- 7 -
address the need for Entergy to file a tariff. However,
customers did make allegations of discriminatory practices, as
follows.
1. Customers alleged that Entergy flat-out refused to
wheel. Louisiana Energy and Power Authority (LEPA) witness
Sylvan J. Richard testified that LEPA's predecessor systems
could not obtain interconnections from Entergy. Ex. SJR-1
at 50.
2. Customers also alleged that Entergy refused to
provide service priority equal to native load and refused to
provide service flexibility equivalent to the utility's own
use. For example, LEPA witness Richard testified that even
after state commissions ordered interconnections and other
coordination services, LEPA's predecessors were still not
able to obtain coordination services because Entergy was not
willing to coordinate and because the transmission service
it did offer was inflexible, unidirectional point-to-point
service, which prevented economic coordination with others.
Id. at 50-51.
3. South Mississippi Electric Power Association
(SMEPA) witness J. Bertram Solomon testified that Entergy's
original "open access" tariff was restricted to point-to-
point service, proposed separate charges for each operating
company, and required the cancellation of existing
agreements in order to take service under the proposed
tariff. Ex. SMEPA-10 at 28. Entergy eventually filed a
,
- 8 -
network tariff, but proposed different local facilities
charges for the various Entergy public utility operating
subsidiaries. Id. at 29. Since these local facilities
charges were higher than the transmission component of the
subsidiaries' bundled rates, Entergy obtained a competitive
advantage. Id.
4. The Arkansas Cities and Cooperatives (ACC) is a
group of cities and cooperatives that own or operate
electric generation or distribution systems in Arkansas.
ACC Witness Steven Merchant testified that Entergy has
segregated the wholesale market between two of its
subsidiaries, Arkansas Power & Light Copmpany (APL) and
Entergy Power, Inc. (EPI). Ex. SMM-1 at 16. In marketing
power and energy in Arkansas, EPI is subject to an Arkansas
Commission order that bars EPI from competing with APL for
wholesale loads without first obtaining a waiver. Id.
Recently, EPI requested this waiver for all wholesale
transactions in Arkansas except for wholesale customers
currently served by an Entergy subsidiary; in other words,
EPI requested the Arkansas Commission to expand competition
for all wholesale customers except where EPI might compete
with APL. Id. ACC witness Merchant concluded that, since
EPI does not compete with APL, Entergy insulates APL's
wholesale business from competition and denies those
wholesale customers access to EPI as a source of power,
thereby limiting alternative generation sources available to
,
- 9 -
ACC. Id. at 17-19. (Entergy's witness Kenney stated that
Entergy has recently filed a joint motion with ACC to the
Arkansas Commission seeking to extend the waiver and permit
EPI to sell to APL's wholesale customers. Ex. JFK-11 at 14-
15.)
C. Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E)
Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) attached several
documents to its 1988 complaint in Docket No. EL89-4. These
documents were provided to support NCPA's claim that PG&E's
unreasonable practices under the PG&E/NCPA Interconnection
Agreement (IA) effectively denied NCPA access to transmission
properly requested under the IA. Although the parties eventually
settled and the Commission terminated the docket with a letter
order dated May 18, 1988, these documents provide allegations of
PG&E using dilatory tactics that so protracted negotiations as to
effectively equal a refusal to wheel. 3/
1. PG&E stated that since transmission was not
currently available, it was entitled to wait 72 months
before providing transmission; that is, transmission access
could not be granted before the passing of the 72-month
notice period. NCPA 1988 Complaint, Ex. 3. However, the IA
3/ All of these incidents are related to and examples of PG&E's
conduct described in the NOPR (FERC Stats. & Regs. 4 32,514
at 33,073 n.151), that is, the history of PG&E's attempt to
avoid its commitments made to the California owners of the
California Oregon Transmission Project (COTP). However,
these incidents are not exactly the same as the incidents
described in the NOPR, because NCPA is not one of the owners
of the COTP.
,
- 10 -
provided that transmission be provided when it becomes
actually available. PG&E also requested substantial
additional information, which NCPA considered beyond that
reasonably necessary for a study, but still provided. PG&E
then determined that transmission was not available,
reasoning that transmission was unavailable unless all the
transmission requested could be provided 8760 hours per year
without restrictions or limitations, extending through the
expiration of the agreement in 2013. NCPA 1988 Complaint at
9.
2. On November 27, 1987, NCPA made a new transmission
request to PG&E, seeking 50 MW of bi-directional
transmission at Midway. NCPA 1988 Complaint, Ex. 5. On
January 28, 1988, PG&E filed an interconnection agreement
with Turlock Irrigation District (TID) that provided TID
with 50 MW of bi-directional transmission at Midway.
Pacific Gas & Electric Company, 42 FERC 4 61,406, order on
reh'g, 43 FERC 4 61,403 (1988). On February 22, 1988, PG&E
advised NCPA that all firm transmission service available at
Midway had been fully subscribed. NCPA 1988 Complaint, Ex.
6. Then, on March 29, 1988, PG&E filed with the Commission
an interconnection agreement with Modesto Irrigation
District (MID), that provided MID with 50 MW of bi-
directional transmission at Midway. Pacific Gas & Electric
Company, 44 FERC 4 61,010 (1988). At about the same time
(in the last week in March 1988), PG&E advised NCPA that the
,
- 11 -
allocations of transmission to TID, MID, and others,
including a not yet finalized allocation to Sacramento
Municipality Utility District, had used all the transmission
available at Midway. NCPA 1988 Complaint, Exs. 7 and 8.
D. Northeast Utilities Service Company (NU)
This is the case where Northeast Utilities acquired Public
Service of New Hampshire (PSNH) (Docket No. EC90-10). New
England Power Company (NEP) witness Robert Bigelow's direct
testimony expressed concern over the "relatively restrictive
transmission policies of both" NU, on behalf of Northeast
Utilities' public utility subsidiaries, and PSNH. Bigelow Direct
Testimony at 21 (filed May 25, 1990). In his cross rebuttal
testimony, Mr. Bigelow testified that "NU has a poor track record
as a provider of transmission service" and "PSNH also has an
abhorrent track record as a provider of transmission services."
Bigelow Cross Rebuttal Testimony, at 3 (filed June 20, 1990).
Mr. Bigelow described both NU's and NEP's (his own company)
failure to provide service flexibility equivalent to their own
use. Except for NEP's TDUs, both NEP and NU historically
provided only point-to-point transmission, which required
separate scheduling for each transaction. Bigelow Cross Rebuttal
at 4.
E. Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas and
Electric Company
The evidence in this merger proceeding (Docket No. EC89-5)
included testimony from a number of witnesses describing
,
- 12 -
instances of Edison's conduct. Richard Greenwalt was the power
supply supervisor for the City of Riverside, California. He was
responsible for scheduling all purchases of energy for Riverside
and for the cities of Azusa, Banning and Colton, California.
Greenwalt testimony at 1 (November 1989). (These four cities and
Anaheim, California, are collectively referred to as the Southern
Cities or Cities.) Joseph Hsu was the Director of Utilities for
Azusa. Hsu testimony at 1 (November 1989). Gale Drews was the
electric utility director of Colton. Drews testimony at 1-2
(November 1989). Bill Carnahan was the director for Riverside.
Carnahan testimony at 1 (November 1989). Gordon Hoyt was the
general manager of the Anaheim power department. Hoyt testimony
at 1 (November 1989). Dan McCann was the power coordination
supervisor for Anaheim. He supervised Anaheim's load scheduling
and is a former Edison employee, having worked for Edison for 20
years. McCann Testimony at 1-2 (November 1989). These witnesses
testified that Edison refused to wheel as follows.
1. Edison's policy was to curtail the Cities any time
it could be justified using any of a list of acceptable
reasons to deny interruptible transmission service. Id. at
22-23.
2. Edison would not generally provide transmission
service when Edison could save money by itself purchasing
the economy energy that would be wheeled. McCann testimony
at 19. The Cities called Edison every hour to request
interruptible transmission service. Id.. Edison often
,
- 13 -
refused to sell energy available in the Western Systems
Power Pool to the Cities and then made available higher cost
contract energy or partial requirements service. Id. at 19-
20.
3. When Anaheim requested Edison provide firm
transmission of power from neighboring states, Edison would
often agree to provide non-firm service but would not
integrate the capacity for many years in the future, saying
that its control area did not need capacity at that time.
Hoyt testimony at 9. Since the selling utility was
interested in a sale of capacity, not just energy, the
transaction would not occur. Id. Edison repeatedly used
its control over transmission to deny Anaheim access to low-
cost firm power. Id. at 9-10.
4. While Edison provided short-term firm transmission
service to the Cities, it would only provide long-term firm
service for three specific resources: the SONGS nuclear
plant, a specific IPP, and Hoover Dam power. Hoyt testimony
at 20. One of Edison's reasons for denying long-term
transmission was that Edison desired to reserve the
transmission for its own future (unspecified) needs. Id.
5. In the 1970s, Edison refused to allow the Cities
access to the Pacific Intertie. Hoyt testimony at 21; Drews
testimony at 7-8.
6. In 1988, Edison refused to provide transmission
service for a Cities power purchase from Public Service
,
- 14 -
Company of New Mexico (PSNM) from Palo Verde Nuclear
station. Hoyt testimony at 21.
7. Edison has refused to provide requested firm
transmission from
- California-Oregon border to Midway Station
- Nevada-Oregon Border to Sylmar Substation
- Palo Verde Switchyard to Vista
- SONGS Switchyard to Vista.
Carnahan testimony at 15.
8. Riverside requested transmission from Palo Verde
and was told that such service was not available. Carnahan
testimony at 16. Edison offered Riverside only 12 MW of
curtailable transmission entitlement to provide Riverside's
share of Palo Verde. Id. This service was neither large
enough or long enough, and Edison insisted on
unreasonable terms and conditions. Id.
9. Azusa, Banning and Colton had a contract with
Edison that entitled them to use their Palo Verde firm
transmission path to schedule energy to meet their contract
energy obligation. Edison refused to permit the three
cities to use that path. Edison did not contest that the
contracts allowed this use, but said that the scheduling of
such small amounts of energy for the three cities would be
too burdensome. Greenwalt testimony at 14.
10. Edison would not respond in a timely manner to the
Cities' requests, routinely taking months to respond. Drews
,
- 15 -
testimony at 15.
11. During the 1980s, Edison provided Colton with some
transmission service to allow the Cities to reach certain
suppliers, but limited the choices available to the Cities
and imposed terms and conditions that increased the Cities'
costs and placed Colton at a disadvantage against Edison.
Drews testimony at 9. Arranging alternative generation
sources was difficult because the Cities always had to first
get Edison to state whether it would provide transmission.
12. During 1988 and 1989, a dispute arose between
Edison and the Cities concerning the Hoover Uprating
Project. Drews testimony at 16. Edison argued that for the
months when units were out of service for uprating, and
Southern Cities capacity was reduced to zero, Southern
Cities would not receive an energy credit, even though
energy was still available and used by Edison. But the
contracts allowed a participant who did not have capacity to
still schedule its energy as non-firm energy on the capacity
of another participant. Id. at 16-17.
13. In 1986, Azusa negotiated a power purchase
contract with the California Department of Water Resources
in increments of first 5 MW and then 2 MW (for a total of 7
MW). Hsu testimony at 14. First Edison assured Azusa that
the transmission for the additional 2 MW would not be a
problem. Id. Then Edison would not agree to amend the
transmission service agreement for the additional 2 MW. Id.
,
- 16 -
14. In 1986, Azusa notified Edison of Special
Condition 12 4/ purchases from PG&E and requested firm
transmission service. Id. Two months before service was to
begin, Edison notified the Cities of a problem with the
transmission lines. Id. Transmission was eventually
granted, but only after a four-month delay and substantial
losses to the Cities. Id. Then Edison decided there was no
problem with its transmission facilities. Id. at 14-15.
15. In 1986-87, the Cities purchased 20 MW from PG&E
and 80 MW from Deseret G&T Cooperative. Hoyt testimony at
7-8. Edison stated that without reinforcement of its
transmission system, Edison would not provide the
transmission. Id. There was a five-month delay during
which the Cities were forced to purchase from Edison at a
higher cost. Id. at 8-9. Then Edison decided that the
transmission system did not need reinforcement. Id. at 8.
16. Edison also refused to provide a service priority
equal to that of native load. It would curtail the Cities
in order to purchase more economy energy for itself. McCann
testimony at 28. If Edison could make the purchase, it
would curtail the City and use the energy for itself. Id.
When Edison curtailed the Cities, they were not able to
4/ Special Condition 12 of the Integrated Operations Agreement
between Edison and the Southern Cities defined certain
Special Condition 12 resources and allowed the Cities to
make certain uses of those resources, subject to certain
restrictions.
,
- 17 -
purchase economy energy and instead purchased energy from
Edison. Id. at 24.
17. According to Edison, the interruptible
transmission it provided the Cities was interruptible for
any reason. Id. at 20. A purchase could be terminated the
hour after it is begun or even during the hour. Id. As a
result, the Cities lost opportunities to make advantageous
economy purchases. Id. at 20-21.
18. Edison also refused to provide customers
flexibility similar to the flexibility Edison provided
itself. Edison's refusal to provide bi-directional
transmission service restricted the Cities' abilities to
purchase hydroelectric energy from the Pacific Northwest.
Hoyt testimony at 22. Because most contracts with Northwest
utilities require a return of power, the Northwest utilities
would not deal with the Cities without transmission to
return energy. Id. at 22-23. Edison did provide bi-
directional transmission to the Los Angeles Department of
Water & Power (LADWP) to accommodate flows to and from
Arizona. Id.
19. Riverside was unable to obtain non-firm service
more than two hours in advance of need. Carnahan testimony
at 18.
20. Riverside and Colton were both served out of
Edison's Vista substation. Although the two cities were on
the same 69 kV bus, Edison would not allow them to sell
,
- 18 -
energy to each other. Greenwalt testimony at 17.
21. Riverside's agreement with Edison allowed
Riverside to purchase a block of energy through the WSPP and
divide it up among the four Cities (Azusa, Banning, Colton
and Riverside). Greenwalt testimony at 17. When Riverside
had excess energy from other sources, Edison would not
permit it to sell that energy to the other three cities.
Id. For example, Riverside attempted to sell Deseret energy
transmitted by LADWP to the Edison system. Id. at 17-18.
LADWP would not break out the Cities' shares of that energy,
and Edison would not accept the energy as a delivery for all
four cities. Id. at 18. Edison argued that because this
energy was excess energy that Riverside could not use,
Riverside did not have transmission rights to bring it into
the control area. Id. As a result, Riverside paid for the
energy delivered by LADWP to the Edison control area, but
could not sell it to the other three cities, and gave it to
Edison itself, which consumed the energy without making any
payment for it. Id. Riverside tried a number of
alternative paths, including using WSPP transmission where
Riverside paid Edison 5 mills to connect to Azusa, 5 mills
to connect to Banning, and 5 mills to connect to Colton for
each megawatthour. While this approach was successful for a
while, eventually Edison refused to permit these sales.
22. Edison claimed that the Cities only have
transmission rights to bring in enough Special Condition 12
,
- 19 -
energy to satisfy the Cities' load. Greenwalt testimony at
18.
23. Edison contended that the Cities' load
requirements were satisfied first by integrated resources
and then by Special Condition 12 and economy energy
purchases. Id. at 19. When the Cities' integrated
resources exceeded their load, any Special Condition 12
resources became excess. Under Riverside's Deseret
contract, the Cities were required to take a minimum of 35
MW each hour. Id. Edison acknowledged that it was
obligated to buy, or allow the Cities to sell, any excess
energy from Riverside's integrated resources. Id. However,
Edison refused to give the Cities credit for excess Special
Condition 12 energy brought into the area, claiming that the
Cities could not have brought it in because they did not
have transmission rights. Id.
II. Other Examples of Transmission Disputes
Disputes over transmission are not uncommon, contrary to
EEI's suggestion. Some recent examples taken from pleadings and
other documents and from Commission orders reveal that it has
been very difficult for various entities in the electric power
industry to agree on transmission rights. These examples also
reveal that even after issuance of AEP and the Open Access NOPR
with its proposed pro forma tariffs, there has been considerable
controversy over whether various utilities' "open access" tariffs
deviate from those tariffs. (The Commission has allowed
,
- 20 -
utilities that adopt tariffs that match or exceed the non-rate
terms and conditions in the NOPR pro forma tariffs to obtain
certain benefits.)
A. In a letter of February 3, 1995 to Mr. Gerald
Richman of the Commission's Enforcement section in the
Office of the General Counsel, Steven J. Kean, Vice
President, Regulatory Affairs, Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
(Enron) alleged that Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NiMo)
refused to wheel power from Rochester Gas & Electric (RG&E)
to Enron under RG&E's transmission contract with NiMo;
however, when Enron revealed the buyer, NiMo did wheel power
for RG&E to the buyer. Mr. Kean alleged that this was not
an isolated incident. NiMo argued that the contract did not
require it to provide RG&E with transmission to Enron. It
also said that the principle of comparability does not
require the service. Letter of November 21, 1994 from NiMo
representative A. Karen Hill to Gerald Richman.
B. The Commission's Task Force Hot Line (Hot
Line) received a complaint that a member of the New
York Power Pool (NYPP) refused to transmit power that
another member bought from a power marketer. In a
letter of November 17, 1994, from Chair Moler to Mr.
William J. Balet, Executive Director of NYPP, Chair
Moler explained that the Commission's enforcement staff
had investigated and found the allegation to be true.
,
- 21 -
C. In Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency
v. Northern States Power Company (Minnesota), 73 FERC 4
61,350 (1995), NSP and SMMPA had a contract under which
NSP agreed to provide transmission service. However,
the parties had numerous disputes over the service.
The Commission found that NSP had misinterpreted the
contract in several ways. For, example, SMMPA argued
that it should be able to directly schedule its
deliveries of energy out of the NSP control area and
that it should not be limited to particular points of
delivery. NSP argued that only it was entitled to
control the physical operation of scheduling. The
Commission found that the clear language of the
contracts gave SMMPA the authority to schedule its own
power.
D. Mid-Continent Area Power Pool, 72 FERC 4 61,223
(1995), involved MAPP's membership criteria, which made it
impossible for a power marketer to join MAPP and obtain the
benefits of certain transmission services available only to
MAPP members. The Commission found that the membership
criteria may be unreasonable, particularly since there may
be less burdensome ways of setting up membership criteria
for non-traditional entities.
, | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
fyi. I'm printing.
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000 03:10
PM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 11/14/2000 03:03 PM
To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: [email protected]
Subject: enovate documents
The following documents are attached:
1) Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement between enovate and PetroCanada. I
have made the following changes to Mary's document:
a) effective date of November 1st, 2000 to coincide with the start of the
transaction,
b) notification for nominations/confirmations, and
c) signature line from enovate to enovate by Enron MW.
Jeff - Can you please print out two copies of this document, initial and have
your assistant deliver them to Janet for execution. Janet will be leaving
for the management conference on Wednesday around noon so the earlier in the
morning the better. I will then have Janet's assistant get them back to me
for delivery to PetroCanada.
2) Audit Waiver
Kay - Can you please print out two copies, initial and I suppose your
assistant can coordinate with Jeff's to make the delivery to Janet. I will
take care of getting Bill's signature.
Thank you both for your assistance. Any questions or comments, let me know.
Gregg | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks, I just ordered it.
DG
[email protected] on 03/28/2001 02:50:26 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Ethics
The internet address is as follows:
http://www.psiware.com/ethics.asp
To: Randy G. Kruger Jr.
cc:
Date: 03/28/2001 02:21 PM
From: [email protected]
Subject: Ethics
Randy,
Could you please send me the info on the ethics course? Thanks.
DG
*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Do you know when they are building the walls around the cube we designated
for Janet Moore? She is concerned. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jane,
I have printed off these forms, had John sign the employee one and have
passed this information on to Dave Delainey. After receiving the
information, please let me know if you have any questions or require any
additional information.
Thanks
Kim Hillis
x30681
From: Jane Allen @ ECT 06/12/2000 12:16 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Margaret Daffin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Green Card Forms
As requested. The supervisor form should be signed by Delaney and I will
get David to sign. Please complete to the best of your ability. If anything
is missing, we can follow-up with HR.
Jane | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I vote for a long lunch one day of the week or 6 p.m. on Monday or 6 p.m. on
Wednesday
PL | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I'm trying to avoid a two elevator ride, if possible. God forbid I should
take the stairs! I'll let you know what he comes up with, if anything.
Kay
From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/18/2000 09:40 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: VEPCO interconnection agreement
I've already got a conference room and requested breakfast on 20. Let me
know if she gets a room so I can change the catering order and call Rudy and
tell him we don't need his room.
Kay Mann@ENRON
09/18/2000 09:21 AM
To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: VEPCO interconnection agreement
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/18/2000 09:21
AM ---------------------------
Reagan Rorschach
09/18/2000 09:16 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: VEPCO interconnection agreement
Kay,
I'll take care of getting the room.
Tuesday--9.00 - 11.00 am
I'll let you know what we get.
Reagan
Enron North America Corp.
From: Kay Mann 09/17/2000 09:00 PM
To: Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: VEPCO interconnection agreement
Hi Reagan,
Is a conference room available on 29? We are having a hard time finding a
meeting place.
Thanks,
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/17/2000 08:59
PM ---------------------------
"Nancy Wodka" <[email protected]> on 09/15/2000 05:25:00 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re: VEPCO interconnection agreement
That will work fine for me.
>>> <[email protected]> 09/15/00 05:42PM >>>
I should mention 900am as the time!
(Embedded Enron North America Corp.
image moved
to file: From: Kay Mann
pic23303.pcx) 09/15/2000 04:36 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron,
[email protected]
cc: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: VEPCO interconnection agreement
How does everybody look for a discussion concerning the VEPCO
interconnection agreement on Tuesday, Sept 19?
I've checked with Christi, Mitch and Reagan, so they don't need to confirm.
Details to follow...
Thanks,
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
You are the man! I will be out of town on Dec 23 through 28 and March 11
through 18. Mark
"Baird, Bob" <[email protected]>
10/18/2000 02:57 PM
To: "Haedicke Mark (Internet) (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Rob
Walls (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Rockets Tickets
In a moment of weakness I agreed to divide up the tickets. I will divide
the tickets up in a manner that is absolutely perfect and totally equitable.
Please let me know if you know of any particular time or times when, for
example, you'll be on vacation or otherwise absent where you would prefer
not to be assigned games. In addition, I am assuming that both of you would
prefer weekends to week nights (let me know if that's not the case). And
let me know if you have any other scheduling issues.
Also, the third exhibition game is this Saturday night against the Spurs. I
believe each of you said you couldn't make it. I'll plan to give them away
unless you will be able to use them. I need to know by tomorrow, however.
Here's the regular season schedule, and I will also be glad to take into
account your preferences on particular games if you'll send me an email
indicating the games you'd like. (or print this out, check games you'd like
and fax it to me at 512/236-3210).
Tuesday, 10/31, Minnesota Timberwolves
Thursday, 11/2, Milwaukee Bucks
Tuesday, 11/7, Los Angeles Lakers
Thursday, 11/9, Vancouver Grizzlies
Tuesday, 11/14, Chicago Bulls
Thursday, 11/16, Charlotte Hornets
Saturday, 11/18, Phoenix Suns
Tuesday, 11/28, Sacramento Kings
Saturday, 12/2, Portland Trailblazers
Tuesday, 12/5, Dallas Mavericks
Saturday, 12/16, Denver Nuggets
Tuesday, 12/19, San Antonio Spurs
Thursday, 12/21, Los Angeles Lakers
Saturday, 12/23, Golden State Warriors
Wednesday, 12/27, Seattle Supersonics
Thursday, 1/4, Detroit Pistons
Saturday, 1/6, Utah Jazz
Saturday, 1/13, Sacramento Kings
Tuesday, 1/16, Toronto Raptors
Wednesday, 1/24, Philadelphia 76ers
Friday, 1/26, Vancouver Grizzlies
Tuesday, 1/30, Miami Heat
Thursday, 2/1, Los Angeles Clippers
Monday, 2/5, New York Knicks
Tuesday, 2/13, Washington Wizards
Saturday, 2/17, Cleveland Cavaliers
Tuesday, 2/20, Boston Celtics
Friday, 2/23, Orlando Magic
Monday, 2/26, Portland Trailblazers
Thursday, 3/8, Los Angeles Clippers
Saturday, 3/10, Golden State Warriors
Tuesday, 3/13, Indiana Pacers
Thursday, 3/15, New Jersey Nets
Saturday, 3/17, San Antonio Spurs
Tuesday, 3/27, Utah Jazz
Thursday, 3/29, Phoenix Suns 6
Tuesday, 4/3, Dallas Mavericks
Thursday, 4/5, Seattle Supersonics
Saturday, 4/7, Atlanta Hawks
Tuesday, 4/10, Denver Nuggets
Tuesday, 4/17, Minnesota Timberwolves
Robert S. Baird
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
One American Center
600 Congress
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: (512)495-8451
When calling from Houston (713)758-2414
Fax: (512)236-3210
Email: [email protected]
Home telephone (512)347-8065
Home fax: (512)347-8065
Pager: 1-888-487-2651 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is the October 2000 nomination for our takes under the Gas Sales and
Purchase Contract between TXU Fuels (previously TUFCO) and HPL Resources Co.,
(TXU Fuels Contr. #3949), as well as our September 2000 nomination for takes
under the Gas Sales and Purchase Contract between TXU Fuels and SDS. Please
advise should you have any questions concerning the attached.
Thanks,
CCS
(See attached file: MinHPLN00.xls) (See attached file: SDSNOM.xls)
- MinHPLN00.xls
- SDSNOM.xls | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sheila Tweed, the lawyer for this turbine product, has approved all of the counterparties on the attached list to trade this product, EXCEPT The City of Tacoma, Dept. of Public Utilities. Let me know if you need anything further from me.
-----Original Message-----
From: Meredith, Kevin
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:58 PM
To: Jones, Tana; Lambert, Karen
Subject: FW: CGT Option Credit Access List
The attached document is a list of counterparties that must be reviewed and approved by 2:00PM Friday. All counterparties will have "read" access to the product, which is a Physical Turbine option, and the following list will have execute access. Please contact me at 3-9555 or Karen O'Day at 5-4135 if you have questions.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Stephen
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:05 PM
To: Meredith, Kevin; Puthigai, Savita; Bradford, William S.
Subject: CGT Option Credit Access List
Here is a list of 24 customers who are likely purchasers of the CGT option product. It really doesn't matter if all of them get access, as long as the whole of EOL can see the product. Credit can pick from amongst number of these counterparties for initial access. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Enron is proud to be a part of CowParade Houston 2001. This exciting public art event is designed to promote the arts and benefit the Building for Children capital campaign at Texas Children's Hospital and the Texas Children's Cancer Center.
CowParade Houston 2001 will feature over 300 cow sculptures, which will be transformed into magnificent works of art and displayed all over Houston, September 6 through November 7. Sotheby's will conduct the live auction on December 6, 2001 at the Wortham Theater Center in downtown Houston.
At Enron, we believe the most innovative ideas come from our employees and the CowParade Houston is no exception. We would like to invite you to share your opinion with us regarding what to name our bovine friend. Enron's cow is designed to represent the unique look of the Enron Center's reflective glass exterior. Please keep in mind that all names submitted must conform to the CowParade's guidelines (no corporate logos or names) and should represent Enron's "Vision and Values."
Please click here to place your vote and share your ideas http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0693081/i.asp
E-mail [email protected] with any questions or comments. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I hope you know I am sending these to you in jest. I think it is funny. In
all seriousness, good luck this weekend. Even with your record, I am
nervous.
PL | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sara
You are right about the tax issue - in fact, we are in the process of
replacing the UK directors and officers of Enron Credit Inc with US directors
and officers.
The entity that signs up to the confidentiality agreement ought to be the one
that owns the information to be supplied. Based on conversations I have had
with Richard Sage, I had formed the impression that the owner of the
information was Enron Credit Ltd. If this is right, we should pursue your
first suggestion. Otherwise, given that the tax issue is being rectified and
this should therefore be an isolated incident, I think we can wear the tax
risk inherent in your second suggestion. Though I do wonder whether an
officer of Enron Credit Inc, such as Richard Sage (currently), could sign,
rather than a director?
Kind regards
Guenther Klar | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000
05:09 PM ---------------------------
Office of the Chairman
From: Office of the Chairman@ENRON on 10/05/2000 07:55 AM
To: ClickatHome mailout
cc:
Subject: A Computer and Internet Connection for You and Your Family
As you know, technology is critical to Enron; it drives our success and will
continue to do so in the future. Technology has helped Enron create new
businesses like Enron Broadband Services and Enron Net Works, and it is
responsible for applications such as EnronOnline and EnronCredit.com. You,ve
seen what technology can do at work. Now we want you and your family to
realize its benefits at home.
With that in mind, we are excited to let you know that we are introducing the
ClickAtHome
program, which will give each employee a computer for use at home. Where
technology permits, we will also subsidize an Internet connection. With the
click of a mouse, a home computer plus Internet access will put a world of
Internet knowledge at your family,s fingertips.
We have just signed an agreement with Dell Computer Corporation to provide
the computer hardware. We wanted to let you know about the program now in
case you and your family were considering the purchase or upgrade of a home
computer or Internet connection in the next few months. The scope of
ClickAtHome includes the following:
? Basic package: Dell desktop computer with a high-speed processor, floppy
disk drive, mouse, speakers, monitor, modem, CD-ROM drive and Windows 2000
software. Employees will have the option to receive a subsidized Internet
connection, including broadband, where commercially available.
? Participation: This program will be available to active regular full-time
and regular part-time employees of Enron and its wholly owned subsidiaries;
however, employees of some Enron companies (Portland General Electric, EOTT,
Enron Facility Services) may not be able to participate due to legal,
accounting, tax, labor or business reasons. Eligibility includes being
employed at the time of implementation.
? Timing: U.S. employee sign-up will begin in early 2001, with delivery of
the equipment and Internet connection to follow shortly thereafter. Delivery
of equipment to participating non-U.S. employees is targeted for late 2001.
Details about this program are still being finalized. To address some of
your initial questions, we,ve posted a question-and-answer document on
http://clickathome.enron.com. We will schedule an eSpeak session in the near
future where you will have an opportunity to ask questions. Or, you can
submit your questions and comments to [email protected].
We are excited to extend our investment in technology to you and your
family. We believe this program takes communication at Enron to a new level
by creating endless possibilities for you to experience and participate in
the broadband Internet revolution. It is just another reason why we believe
Enron is a great place to work. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The letter to your plastic surgeon looks very good. Nice job and best of
luck.
Best,
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hey Tony
My fax number is 713-646-3390.
Talk to you soon! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I was a little concerned when I got this email and I discussed it with Mark
Taylor and I just want to confirm with you, that you are responsible for any
changes to resolutions for UK online corporations and we are responsible for
US online corporations. No changes should be made to the EnronOnline, LLC or
Enron Net Works Board Resolutions without going through me or Mark.
I checked the EnronOnline minute books in the vault and unless I am plain
missing it I have not prepared and see no resolutions appointing Lara
McKinney or Arfan as Agents and Attorneys-in-Fact to execute Password
Applications (which is the only authority we would give them, not general
signing authority for any other documents). I need to confirm whether you
have prepared any resolutions granting Lara & Arfan signing authority and if
you have I need to get copies faxed to me. Of course, I only care about
Enron Online, the other two companies fall under your jurisdiction.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2001 10:37 AM -----
Lara McKinney/ENRON@EUEnronXGate
05/24/2001 03:17 AM
To: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Savita Puthigai/ENRON@enronXgate, Torrey Moorer/ENRON@enronXgate, Arfan
Aziz/Enron@EUEnronXGate
Subject: RE: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around
Please note that Arfan and I have already been made authorised signatories
for the following Enron entities:
Enron Power Operations Limited
Enron Australia Finance Pty Ltd
EnronOnline LLC
On Amita's removal as signatory, can we wait until the 11th June? She will
be heading up the London Product Control Group until then.
Regards,
Lara
-----Original Message-----
From: Denny, Jennifer
Sent: 23 May 2001 22:39
To: Taylor, Mark; Jones, Tana
Cc: Puthigai, Savita; McKinney, Lara; Moorer, Torrey
Subject: FW: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around
Mark/Tana,
Due to the recent organizational changes with Sheri Thomas & Amita Gosalia
(see memo below), we will need to remove them as "agents and
attorneys-in-fact to execute Password Applications on behalf of EOL" and add
Savita Puthigai, Lara McKinney and myself.
Also, Dale Neuner should be removed as he is no longer part of EnronOnline
operations but is responsible for DealBench and CommodityLogic operations.
Savita suggested we also add Torrey Moorer since I will be out on maternity
leave in mid July and he will be backing me up during that time.
Can you let me know the turnaround time of a change like this?
Also, is it separate documentation for North America and Europe?
Thank you for your help.
Jennifer
3-5824
To better leverage intellectual capital across Enron Net Works, we have
several organizational announcements to share with you:
Sally Beck, Tom Gros and Beth Perlman will work together to direct our
efforts to &commercialize8 our mid and back office services. They will
report to the ENW Office of the Chair. Sally will continue to lead the
day-to-day operations of our mid & back office. In addition to leading the
development and marketing of Commodity Logic, Tom will have primary
responsibility for the marketing of our mid & back office services. Beth
will continue to lead IT development for the Americas, including Commodity
Logic and all other systems necessary to deliver mid & back office services.
Joining Tom,s marketing team are Sheri Thomas, Frank Davis, Andrea Crump,
Jeff Harbert and Fred Philipson.
The EnronOnline Product Control function, currently reporting to Sheri
Thomas, will fold into EnronOnline Operations. Savita Puthigai will lead the
combined group, which will have responsibility for all non-IT day-to-day
operations. Sheri will move to the mid & back office commercialization
effort reporting to Tom Gros. Jennifer Denny will assume Sheri,s
responsibilities as the lead for product control.
Amita Gosalia, director of EnronOnline Europe Support, has accepted a new
position with EBS in London. With her departure, Lara Fields will assume
responsibility for the EnronOnline support team in Europe and report to
Savita. Paul Goddard will continue to lead our marketing efforts in Europe
and report directly to Andy Zipper, who will continue to lead all of
EnronOnline,s activities. Angela Connelly will continue to manage
EnronOnline,s content in Europe and report to Kal Shah. Additionally, John
Pavetto, John Cummings, John Allario, Mike Haney and Jake Staffel will join
Andy,s team to focus on origination opportunities around the EnronOnline
application.
Rex Shelby and David Berberian will focus on special initiatives and new
business opportunities. Brandon Wax will manage ENW,s investment portfolio.
Mark S. Palmer will lead the Transaction Development and Structuring team.
In their new roles, Rex, Brandon and Mark will report to the ENW Office of
the Chair.
Please join us in congratulating everyone on their new responsibilities and
thank you for your continued support as we position ENW for the future.
-----Original Message-----
From: Puthigai, Savita
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:02 AM
To: Denny, Jennifer
Subject: RE: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around
Will do.
-----Original Message-----
From: Denny, Jennifer
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:49 PM
To: Puthigai, Savita
Cc: Lees, Lisa
Subject: FW: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around
Importance: High
Savita,
I think Lara, myself & you need to be added to this and others removed.
This is for PAs which are in Lisa's group.
Do you want to speak with Sheri & Legal (Mark Taylor, Tana Jones)?
-----Original Message-----
From: Neuner, Dale
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:21 PM
To: Denny, Jennifer
Subject: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around
Importance: High
The Unanimous Written Consent of Managers of EnronOnline, LLC dated 11-06-00,
effective as of 10-11-00, appoints Amita Gosalia, Dale Neuner and Sheri
Thomas as agents and attorneys-in-fact to execute Password Applications on
behalf of EOL. This resolution will expire one year from the date of its
effectiveness. When executing, these signatories must sign as &Agent and
Attorney-in-fact8.
Dale Neuner, Manager
Product Control Groups
CommodityLogic; DealBench | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Steve,
I shall talk to Anjam about it. Our impression here in Houston is that Thomas
is quite qualified
and we are very interested in him. A few days will not make much difference
in the hiring process.
Vince
Steven Leppard
04/17/2000 03:50 AM
To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thomas Knudsen
Dale, Vince
As you all know I have attempted to get Thomas Knudsen interviewed as a
result of Prof Lane Hughston's recommendation (Lane is an acquaintance of
Vince and me, and is a very senior figure in the world of quant finance).
Anjam vetoed the idea of interviewing Thomas since he was "too old and too
experienced". Since I felt that Thomas has some merit, I asked Houston to
have an informal chat with Thomas. Houston wish to pursue the interview
process further, and Anjam has set about setting up the interviews. I'm
somewhat concerned about the way in which Anjam is going about this, since it
seems he's trying to put up barriers to these interviews.
I received a concerned email from Thomas Knudsen this morning in which he
recounts some strange conversations with Anjam. He says he received a call
from Anjam on Thursday (13th April) evening (outside office hours), asking
how he got his CV into Enron (I'd shown Anjam the email and CV back in early
February), and how Anjam could contact him (despite the fact he was
contacting him at that moment).
Anjam then called Thomas on his work number (bad form) on Friday 14th asking
Thomas to come in for interviews on Monday (one working day's notice).
Thomas told Anjam he was going on holiday on Wednesday of this week, and that
he'd have to see if he could make time given the need to tidy up some things
at work. He said he'd contact Anjam on Monday (today) to confirm his
availability.
Today (17th April) Thomas called Anjam to say he couldn't make it, and that
he wouldn't be able to make it for two weeks (not so serious, he thought,
given that we're losing time to Easter anyway). Anjam told Thomas that the
position might be filled in two weeks' time.
Thomas is concerned about missing the boat, and I for one didn't even realise
it was leaving so soon!
Can anyone shed any light on this?
Steve | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jeffrey,
Congratulations on the Business Week cover; very nice.
Things going along at a dizzying clip here; I will be proposing to Sukran on
Wednesday evening (our two year meeting anniversary)?at a great little, newly
found (by me at least) restaurant in my neighborhood. I have hired a fasil
(classic Ottoman music) band to serenade us at our table, etc. If all goes
well (and there are lots of little hurdles to be leapt) looking at an early
June wedding. Yikes!
At the same time think I have found a fantastic place here on the Asian side
over looking the Bosphorus. Not a sure thing, as have to make sure to
minimize the many risks. But if it works out it,s a house for a lifetime.
Really special; it even has a 2d class historical rating, which means among
other things it would be tax-free for five years. Would be the house that (my
) Enron (stock) bought.
Hope all goes well. Still haven't broken all of the above news to mom and
dad, though will need to do that soon as well.
Say hey to Rebecca and the kids.
With love.
Mark
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Deal moves has been completed and retranslated.
Cecilia
-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Cheung, Cecilia
Subject: RE: new script for moving books
1. move to the appropriate book based on the logic - Canadian deal needs to go to CAD
2. should only have to change deals from NG-Price to bankruptcy (deals are not in any other book)
3. The Canadian logic deals will probably be in GJ and the US logic should be in NG
4. Financial only
5. Cutoff date 1/1/2002
-----Original Message-----
From: Cheung, Cecilia
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Cc: Keiser, Kam; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Giron, Darron C.; Lim, Francis S.
Subject: FW: new script for moving books
These are interbook deals and I need to confirm the following:
1. Which Bankruptcy book you want to move the deals to? BANKRUPTCY (166660) or BANKRUPTCY-CAD (166762)?
2. Change the counterparty of the deals associated with FT-CAND-TERMIN (166764) or FT-CAND-GONE-PR (166767) from NG-PRICE(11360), ENA-FT-WT-SOCAL(108201), ENA-WT-CAL(105544) to Bankruptcy (166660 or 166762)?
3. Should we should NGGJ as the commodity instead of NG?
4. Financial deals only
5. Cutoff date 1-jan-2002
-----Original Message-----
From: Keiser, Kam
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Cheung, Cecilia
Subject: FW: new script for moving books
Those two counterparties could be currently in NG-Price, ENA-WT-Socal, or ENA-WT-Cal, not just NG-Price.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Cheung, Cecilia
Cc: Giron, Darron C.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Keiser, Kam
Subject: new script for moving books
Please move the following book to book trades with Canada from NG-Price to Bankruptcy:
FT-Cand-Termin
Ft-Cand-Gone-PR
Pleae let me know when this is done, we are waiting to calc today on this. Thanks.
PL | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: Evans, Mark (London Legal)
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:49 PM
To: Haedicke, Mark E.; Walls Jr., Rob
Subject: ENRON EUROPE
Mark, Rob
My apologies for adding to your burden at this difficult time. However hopefully this might clarify our discussions of yesterday and enable us all to move on quickly.
Enron Europe and its directors are facing two related issues:
1. Continuing to trade
The directors of EEL and its subsids have to be satisfied that there is a reasonable prospect of avoiding an insolvent liquidation. This is a fairly low hurdle to pass and, in our situation, calls made on Corp. for cash have been promptly met and we have read the news today of a new confirmed facility so we already have a fair degree of comfort.
The directors meet with independent counsel tomorrow but I believe that they will probably come out of that session asking for nothing more than a confirmation, by email to say Michael Brown, but from the top - Jeff or Greg, of where they currently see things, ie a positive prognosis for the future. That piece of electronic paper should be enough to enable the directors to reasonably conclude that we are not hurtling into Chapt 11 and to continue to trade. It would also be very helpful if that email could confirm that Michael would be promptly informed if things took a downward turn.
I would be happy to draft a note but wonder whether the best way of quickly putting this to bed might be for a conversation to be had with Jeff/Greg to see what they would be prepared to say. That could then be drafted up and sent over.
2. Filing accounts
The directors of Enron Europe and its subsids cannot file accounts on a going concern basis unless they are comfortable they will have adequate funds in the medium term to run their businesses. The hurdle here is higher than in point 1 above as prospective cash shortages would require the accounts to be qualified long before the directors would have to stop trading under point 1 above. So more comfort will probably be required here, which could include further details of the new facility (drawdown conditions and maturity periods) and prospects for further facilities being signed. This would back up the usual support letter.
I should add that we have not actually received this year the usual support letter from Corp. addressed to Enron Europe and its subsids. I don't know if it has been formally requested but we will definitely need to see that document this time around. Could you please point me in the right direction for that?
We now have until the end of January to file the accounts so point 1 above is definitely the immediately crucial issue. We would however like to resolve the accounts issue as soon as possible. Perhaps we could liaise with Joel to get a letter drafted and then signed by Jeff or Greg?
That's it. It really boils down to requiring a bit more information from Corp. There is absolutely no desire to cause problems here, just a desire to put in place the right pieces of information (which we are sure are out there but we need to collect them in) which will safeguard the European directors personally and enable them to move on from these concerns to the more pressing business of Q4.
Many thanks.
Mark | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Per your request, attached is my project list for the week of August 13, 2001.
Samantha M. Boyd
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803
Houston, Texas 77002
Ph: (713) 853-9188
Fax: (713) 646-3490
-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:08 PM
To: Cook, Mary; Gray, Barbara N.; Greenberg, Mark; Hendry, Brent; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Nelson, Cheryl; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Heard, Marie; Jones, Tana; Panus, Stephanie
Subject: Project Lists
If you have not sent me a current project list within the last week, please do so no later than noon tomorrow using the attached format.
<< File: Project list template.doc >>
Mark Taylor
Vice President and General Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
(713)853-7459 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 3/26/01.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Message sent from the pjm-customer-info mailing list at [email protected]:
PJM Announces two additional dates for the one-day course Fundamentals of
Available Capacity which will explain the way that capacity will be handled for
PJM West.
January 29, 2002 - Pittsburgh, PA Airport Hyatt
January 10, 2002 - Desmond Hotel, Malvern, PA
Times: 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. (Registration will begin at 8:00 a.m.)
Target audience:
Load Serving Entities (LSEs), Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs), and
Generation
Owners who serve load in PJM West or plan to participate in the PJM West
Available
Capacity Market, and
LSEs, EDCs, and Generation Owners who currently use eCapacity. eCapacity II is
a
redesign of the current version of eCapacity. eCapacity II will handle both the
PJM East
Unforced Capacity Market and the PJM West Available Capacity Market.
Course topics and additional information and a registration form can be found
from the PJM.com Training page at
http://www.pjm.com/training/training_index.html.
Please DO NOT REPLY to this message. If you have a question for PJM Customer
Relations and Training, please complete and submit this form:
http://www.pjm.com/contact/questions.html
To unsubscribe from this list, send an e-mail to [email protected]
containing only the following line in the body of the e-mail:
unsubscribe pjm-customer-info | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Kevin,
Thanks for taking good care of us.
Vince
Kevin G Moore
01/11/2000 07:16 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Plants for offices on 19th Floor
On yesterday I spoke with our plant caretaker for the
19th floor.
She made mention to me that she was going to bring
more plants for our department therefore , requesting
from facilities will not be necessary.
She will replace the old plants with new fresh plants.
Thanks
Kevin Moore
Let's see what happens...... | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
?
----- Original Message -----
From: kamelang
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 11:02 AM
Subject: Fw: Where Did We Go Wrong
?
----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
[email protected] ; Anita Nazzaro
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 6:29 AM
Subject: Where Did We Go Wrong
...Hard to believe this was written by a high school student...
A Columbine High School student wrote:
The paradox of our time in history is that we have taller buildings,
but
shorter tempers; wider freeways, but narrower viewpoints; we spend
more,
but have less; we buy more, but enjoy it less.
We have bigger houses and smaller families; more conveniences, but
less
time; we have more degrees, but less sense; more knowledge, but less
judgment; more experts, but less solutions; more medicine, but less
wellness.
We have multiplied our possessions, but reduced our values.
We talk too much, love too seldom, and hate too often.
We've learned how to make a living, but not a life; we've added years
to
life, not life to years.
We've been all the way to the moon and back, but have trouble crossing
the
street to meet the new neighbor.
We've conquered outer space, but not inner space; we've cleaned up the
air,
but polluted the soul; we've split the atom, but not our prejudice.
We have higher incomes, but lower morals; we've become long on
quantity,
but short on quality.
These are the times of tall men, and short character; steep profits,
and
shallow relationships.
These are the times of world peace, but domestic warfare; more leisure,
but
less fun; more kinds of food, but less nutrition.
These are days of two incomes, but more divorce; of fancier houses,
but
broken homes.
It is a time when there is much in the show window and nothing in the
stockroom; a time when technology can bring this letter to you, and a
time
when you can choose either to forward this message and make a difference
or just hit delete. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
- TESLA Flyer.doc
- Model Accuracy.doc
- TESLA glossy.doc
- UK Accuracy.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI
___________________________________________________________
The below Houston Pipe Line meter has been set up in Global Facilities.
Meter: 098-8746
Facility Number: 513445
Name: VIDOR CITY GATE CHECK
Type: Check
System: 765 - Texoma Pipeline
Rate Zone: 40 (Vidor)
Trade Zone: 8 (East Texas)
Flow Direction: Delivery
Lateral:
Work Order #:
NOTE: Meter 0988746 is the check meter to 098-0413.
Please call me at ext. 3-3446 if you have any questions.
Donna | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 2/6/02; HourAhead hour: 8; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020608.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule. Unable to assign deal number. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000 08:09
AM ---------------------------
Karen E Jones@ECT
10/26/2000 05:30 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: WestLB
My adds to you list are (1) the "2-Train" contract for Pastoria (7FAs, HRSGs
& other ancillary equipment) and (2) the "1-Train" contract for Pastoria
(agreement in principle with final, full-blown contract nearing completion).
-- Regards,
Karen
To: Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Barton
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, David K
Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl
Costa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT,
[email protected]
cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: WestLB
To all,
As you know, Enron is refinancing the equipment we bought through WestLB.
I've been asked to compile a list of all the equipment purchased through
WestLB, and the change orders related to same. All I know about is the LM
deal with GE (with 1 executed change order, approximately 4 or 5 pending) and
the ABB transformer deal (with one CO pending). Please let me know if you
are aware of any others.
Thanks,
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I was chatting with Chapman yesterday, and he tells me the movie you were in
is Gladiator. This is major! I had no idea you were in the biggest hit of
the summer, and probably the year. How will I know which barbarian is you?
Can we see your face? Does your horse have special markings so we can tell
it's you? I'm going to have to watch it in slo mo when it comes out in video!
This is quite exciting. I guess next thing you'll be hiring an agent (for
you and/or your horse, depending on who gets better reviews?!)... | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I have asked Britt to follow up on this matter. He will attempt to determine
who are the targets of these letters. He is also doing some research on
whether the atty violated an ethical duty by sending this letter to Rick
Causey and others at Enron. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi there,
I decided to work from home this am due to a headache.
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Daren:
During the period of 1/1/2000 to 1/4/2000, the above meter has recorded flow
on the following days with no deals attached:
Days Mmbtus
1/1/00 3,737
1/2/00 3,713
1/3/00 3,730
1/4/00 800
11,980
Deal #120891 was at that meter during 12/99 production month, but it expired
on 12/31/99. Currently, these volumes are being booked under the HPL
Strangers Gas Contract. Logistics needs either (1) have Deal #120891
extended, (2) new deal, or (3) approval to writeoff these volumes to
Unaccounted for Gas. (Please print, sign, and return original to Clem
Cernosek).
__________________________________________________________
Deal/Deal Ticket#/Customer (Seller/Buyer)
OR
______________________________________________________
Approval to Writeoff the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss
Thanks, Clem | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Have fun. Gas prices are going through the roof
Jerry W Germany <[email protected]> on 12/08/2000 10:38:13 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject:
GREAT DAY TO TAKE 1/2 DAY OFF AND GO BIKE RIDING! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Joshua:
I found the Enron staff who have had the conversations with the Oregon PUC so
believe the attached Q&A meet your request. If you need additional
materials, just let me know.
In addition, EPSA sent some questions they would like the Senator to ask of
any of the EPSA witnesses (Reliant, Calpine, Williams, or Enron) dealing with
the Impact of the Recent changes in the Management of the California
Independent System Operator:
Background: The Cal ISO acts as the "air traffic controller" for the
interstate electric power grid in California. The ISO determines who gets
access to the grid and under what terms and conditions. It is the ISO that
helps ensure that access to the grid is truly open and non-discriminatory.
When the ISO was initially constituted several years ago, a "stakeholder"
management board was created that represented a wide range of market
interests---power sellers, generators, consumers, political leaders, etc.
After the power emergencies began last summer, this board was criticized as
too splintered and indecisive. In a response to this perception and in an
effort to impose greater control over the ISO, the California state
legislature replaced the stakeholder board with a five-person board that
serves at the request of the California Governor.
QUESTION: The Cal ISO has recently seen its management board changed from
one with broad stakeholder representation to one appointed by the California
Governor. Given that California is a critical part of a larger western
regional power market, how can we ensure that regional power needs are
reflected in the decisions of the new state appointed Board?
ANSWER: We really can't. Most of the time, the Board has a limited role.
However, the "traffic controller" role becomes crucial when the power crunch
comes. Every market participant needs to be worried that, during times of
real power emergencies, the Cal ISO Board will be too willing to shoot first
and ask questions later. Companies with firm transactions involving
out-of-state entities may find their needs and commercial interests
sacrificed to prevent local political problems. Instead of robust,
competitive regional markets, politicizing transmission decisions practically
guarantees an increasingly balkanized market. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please increase deliveries to Eastrans to 60,000 MMBtu/dy from 50,000
MMbtu/dy for 2/3/01.
The redeliveries will be 7300 MMBtu/dy from Fuels Cotton Valley and
52700 MMBtu/dy to PG&E | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The deal is final. Attached are some communication materials for you to use.
-----Original Message-----
From: Denne, Karen
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Lay, Kenneth; Frevert, Mark; McMahon, Jeffrey; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Derrick Jr., James; Kean, Steven J.; Koenig, Mark; Colwell, Wes; Rieker, Paula; Tilney, Elizabeth; Olson, Cindy; Oxley, David; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Fallon, Jim; Haedicke, Mark E.; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Mcconnell, Mike; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherriff, John; Delainey, David W.; Dietrich, Janet; Leff, Dan; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Hayslett, Rod; McCarty, Danny; Beck, Sally; Piper, Greg; Pickering, Mark; Joyce, Mary; Sherrick, Jeffrey; Garland, Kevin; Stanley, Brian; Metts, Mark; Muller, Mark S.; DeSpain, Tim
Cc: Fleming, Rosalee; Daw, Nicki; Ford, Sue; Heathman, Karen K.; Westbrook, Sharron; Harris, Stephanie J ; McVicker, Maureen; Valencia, Laura; Tijerina, Shirley; Johnson, Kelly; Clyatt, Julie; Schiller, Marsha; Marshall, Lucy; Elbertson, Janette; Schoppe, Tammie; Brooks, Loretta; Phillips, Cathy; Burns, Jennifer; Chapman, Kay; Stark, Cindy; Blackwood, Connie; Armstrong, Julie; Spiller, Tina; Wright, Teresa; Costello, Lisa; Valdez, Christina; Campos, Kathy; Hiltabrand, Leslie; Rushing, Rebekah; Denne, Karen
Subject: Merger Communication Materials
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential
Attached are the latest communication materials. We DO NOT have a deal yet, but I am sending these so that you have time to review before holding floor/staff meetings in the event we have an announcement later today. Please do not forward these materials, as they are not yet final. If there are any changes in these materials when the deal becomes final, I will resend them. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Karen
x39757
Attachments:
-- timeline for communication rollout
-- key messages, for use with internal and external audiences
-- talking points for use with employees
-- email to employees w/ link to Q&As
-- video script (to be viewed by employees on the intranet: UpFront!)
-- External Q&A, for use with the media and external audiences
-- Internal Q&A, for background use in meetings with employees
-- Intranet Q&A, posted on the web for employees | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
TASK ASSIGNMENT
Task Priority: 1
Task Due On:
Task Start Date: | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Kevin,
With respect to James' latest economic analysis, ($843 MM capx; 550,000/d firm contracts to Phoenix; 60/40 debt/equity, 4.75% fuel in years 1/2/3, tracker thereafter) for each year of the project, I'd like to see-
Fianancial statements for each year
- Income statement
- Balance sheet
- Funds flow
Financial ratios for each year during the 20 year contract term
- Debt to capitalization
- Debt Equity
- Debt to Asset
- Times Interest Earned
- Debt Service Coverage
Amount of unrecovered debt and equity at the end of the 20 year contracts,
Distributable cash for each year - - - depending how much there is, we could lock it up to pay off debt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The security desk, has changed TDS access approval from Bill Kasemervisz to
each respective desk lead.
The attached application should be saved on your C:drive and used to grant
access to people that you want to have access to your desk.
The application is pretty self explanatory, however if you have any questions
please give me a call.
Russ
x37386 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Elizabeth-
Deal # 690249 - Sale
Could you pls the pricing on this deal for March 2001 Production for days 25 & 26 to $ 5.285?
I think Daren is out for the remainder of the day and I need to send out my invoice this afternoon.
Thanks- Katherine
5-8643
---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron on 04/16/2001 03:31 PM ---------------------------
Katherine Herrera
04/16/2001 03:24 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT
cc: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT
Subject: Southern Union- 03/01 prod- Austin Spot deal # 690249 (sale)
Daren -
Per Janet, the price of $5.235 +.05 for deal # 690249 is correct.
Could you pls change the price in the system to $5.285 for days 25 & 26?
Thanks- Katherine
5-8643
---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron on 04/16/2001 03:06 PM ---------------------------
Katherine Herrera
04/16/2001 12:43 PM
To: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT
Subject: Southern Union- 03/01 prod- Austin Spot deal # 690249 (sale)
Janet-
Per Southern Union's confirmation sheet, the 15,000 mmbtus spot deal on days 03/25 & 3/26 should be priced at HSC GDP DA +.05 ( at Tuesday, 3/27/01 pricing- which was $ 5.235). Currently, Sitara is showing a price of HSC GDP +.05.
Is this Tuesday pricing correct? If so, pls forward this to Daren so that he can change the price in Sitara to $ 5.235 +.05 ( Totaling $5.285).
Thanks- Katherine
5-8643 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
liar
Danielle Samson <[email protected]> on 04/27/2000 03:39:30 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Corruption Test
34
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 5:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Corruption Test
55 - how about you? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sara - thanks for the update
Regards - Justin
From: Sara Shackleton on 04/10/2000 11:30 CDT
To: [email protected]
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deutsche Bank AG master agreement
Steve: Just thought I'd follow up since our conversation of 9/13 to see if
you have had an opportunity to redraft the ISDA Schedule and CSA, and,
whether you have reviewed the guaranty which Tana Jones delivered to you
shortly thereafter. Please feel free to give me a call at 713-853-5620. I
will be on vacation from Oct. 6 - Oct. 13. I look forward to hearing from
you. Sara | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hello Jeff,
Please see attached, my attempt at questions 1 and 2 of the next
case. Feel free to use the set up in question 1 to answer question 3. 1
and 3 are very similar - 1 compares what Global Industries does compared to
German GAAP, 3 compares it to US GAAP. There is not much information on
German GAAP so I used a little artistic licence.
Let me know if any of this doesn't make sense - I am a little cloudy right
now with this cold.
Cheers,
- Case 26-1 Global Industries.doc
Kimberly Kupiecki
Director
A&R Partners
[email protected]
(650) 762 2800 main
(650) 762 2825 direct
fax (650) 762 2801 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Further to our conversation, please see the attached draft of a Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for your review.
Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please reset my password. My SAP P# is P00509247. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
neat! don't worry, i'm excited to cook!!!! i'll try to do it in
advance!!!! but if i can't, i'll need to cook at your place!!!! that
ok?!?!?!!!!!! see you soon!!!!!
Best!
Jeff!
P.S. it's 3:14 PM!!!!!!
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
11/21/2000 05:09 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE:
you are wonderful - but you do not have to do it if you get busy or
whatever! Did I tell you that I had my "." key remapped to "!"
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject:
ok. i'm on for stuffing and cranberry sauce. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
ACCEPT ALL MAJOR CREDIT CARDS
98% OF OUR APPLICANTS ARE ACCEPTED!!
TERMINALS & PRINTERS OR PROCESS
DIRECTLY THROUGH YOU WEB SITE OR P.C.
0 DOWN W/GOOD CREDIT,
BAD CREDIT HISTORY? NO PROBLEM!
NO APPLICATION OR SETUP FEE WITH THIS AD.
LOWEST RATES, LOW MONTHLY PAYMENTS
SUPER QUICK APPROVAL AND SET UP!!
REAL TIME SECURE PROCESSING FROM YOUR
WEB SITE OR PHYSICAL STORE FRONT
INCREASE SALES BY UP TO 300%!!
CALL NOW!! 800-487-9955 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
looks good
Richard Shapiro
05/01/2001 06:39 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: "The" Bullet
Let's discuss.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 05/01/2001
06:39 PM ---------------------------
Richard Shapiro
05/01/2001 06:11 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: "The" Bullet
It is critical to our nation's energy future to achieve robust competition
in wholesale power markets in order to ensure that electricity can move most
effectively from where it is produced to where it is most needed. To that
end, this Administration will strongly encourage the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission( FERC) to actively exercise jurisdiction over all
aspects of electricity transmission in interstate commerce and place all uses
of the grid under the same rates, terms, and conditions. This jurisdiction
must also be extended by Congress to cover non-FERC jurisdictional power
authorities. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Bob,
Please activate some new Henry Hub Gas daily swaps that I created this
morning.
Thanks | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Happy Birthday to YOU
Happy Birthday to YOU
Happy Birthday dear Beth
Happy Birthday to YOU!!!
HAPPY 33rd BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
By its January 8 order, the FERC clarified that it did not intend to preclude
the PX from engaging in bilateral forward contracting and that the PX was
free to remove spot market components from its forward contracting rate
scheduling. In its request for rehearing, the PX argued that: (1) FERC had
failed to fix a just and reasonable rate, (2) FERC did not remove the ongoing
prohibition on the IOUs trading in its markets, (3) the January 8 order
prohibited it from operating a spot market and that prohibition was unduly
discriminatory, and (4) FERC failed to provide a viable alternative to its
forward market rate schedule. FERC dismissed the PX's request for rehearing
of its January 8 order, finding that all of the PX's concerns emanate from
the FERC's December 15 order not its January 8 order.. See attached order.
- EL00-95.1 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Can he come over to our trading floor around 11:00 am? I can give him a quick tour and then give him a macro overview of the NA energy markets. Please confirm via e-mail and directly with my asst. (TJ Black at 713-853-5800).
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Baker, James+" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:"Baker, James+" <[email protected]>@ENRON]
Sent: Mon 2/4/2002 4:26 PM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:
Subject: RE: meeting with Erik Fabrikant
Russell would like for you to meet with him for an informational interview. An in person meeting would be preferable,
but whatever is available with your schedule is fine. My understanding is that he is not formally looking for a job
yet, but trying to get a feel for different types of positions available within the energy industry. Erik is the son of
one of Russell's clients and will graduate from school in May. I will try to get more color from Russell and forward it
to you.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:18 PM
To: Baker, James+
Subject: RE: meeting with Erik Fabrikant
What do you need from me? Do you want me to meet with him? talk to him
on the phone? go to lunch? is he looking for a job? As you can see,
I don't have much information of the objective here.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Baker, James+" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: meeting with Erik Fabrikant
Kevin,
It looks like Tuesday morning will work best for Erik. I am supposed to
meet with him at 9:00 am Tuesday morning, but
am flexible if that time works for you. Just let me know what time is
ideal and I will schedule it with Erik.
Visit our website at <http://www.ubswarburg.com>
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged
material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all copies of the message.
This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or
any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
Visit our website at <http://www.ubswarburg.com>
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
For your review. Let's talk early Monday.
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel, Shonnie
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:27 PM
To: Nemec, Gerald; Sherman, Cris; Wiederholt, Patricia; Peters, Jerry
Cc: Baldridge, Don
Subject: Final Settlement Statement and Amendment to Master Services Agreement
At the request of Don Baldridge I am forwarding a draft Final Settlement Statement and an Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (clean and red lined against the version previously provided Enron North America Corp.).
Shonnie Daniel
Crestone Energy Ventures, L.L.C.
1400 16th Street, Suite 310
Denver, CO 80202
Phone (720) 946-3667
Fax (720) 946-3710
[email protected]
PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION: DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This communication may contain information that, may be subject to the attorney-client privilege, be attorney work product,or be otherwise privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically transmitted materials is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at 866-946-3601and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please notify immediately via e-mail the sender that you have received the communication in error. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.