text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
fyi
----- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron on 04/17/2001 09:15 PM -----
Harry Kingerski
04/17/2001 09:13 PM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, (bcc:
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron)
Subject: Questions - round 1
Can we discuss some of this on the morning call ...
1. Proposal is critically dependent on a forecast of market price. It is
asserted that the current market price is $300. This is based on a weighted
average of NYMEX futures for COB for on-peak and historical NP-15 off-peak
for Jan - Mar, extrapolated to the rest of the year.
Questions: COB prices are much closer to NP-15 than they are to SP-15 (which
are much lower, at least some of the time). In the real time price, we
average NP and SP 15. Why don't we average in something representative of
SP-15 when we calculate market price?
The effect of not doing this is to overestimate market price, and therefore
raise the threshold (87%) above where it should be. For example, if the
market price were estimated at $200, the real time price would apply starting
at 78%. Would we be agreeable to averaging in the NYMEX Palo Verde price as
a proxy for SP-15?
Better yet, would we say the market price for PG&E and SCE would be
separately calculated based on different weights for those two indices?
Do you see any value in doing the calculation separately for on and off peak
rather than averaging them together (I was already asked this at the
workshop)?
2. The formula for revenue sufficiency produces the perverse result that, as
market price goes up, the 87% threshold also goes up. In other words, if
market price were $1000, then the threshold is calculated at 97%. The entire
revenue requirement is then recovered over the last 3% of usage, and is very
vulnerable to elasticity.
Questions: Can we avoid this problem by simply saying, 87% is a reasonable
number to start with, we don't recommend changing this based on changing
market prices, and if market prices change radically in the future, we would
expect DWR to come up with a new revenue requirement and and so the $30
target would change? (This equates to saying the $30 is right on target with
DWR's current needs.)
Stated another way, there is no change to our mechanism for changing market
prices until or unless DWR comes in with another revenue requirement that
justifies moving form the $30 target. In the meantime, our method is
somewhat self-correcting in that the last 13% is subject to a floating
price. ok?
3. The utility cost in the formula is $65.
Questions: This would be specific to each utility, correct? In other words,
each utility would have its own market price (see #1) and embedded cost? The
$65 includes QFs, right; in other words, it's for everything other than the
net short?
Tamara and Scott - thanks for all the material you've been sending my way.
Helps very much. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Leslie --
Please call Jeff.
Jim
Leslie Lawner
09/08/2000 11:17 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:
Do you have a final version of the paper explaining why California is having
the problems it is? I will be making a presentation in NM about this on the
26th. Thanks. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sally - Is there someone in your group that we can start discussing these
items with?
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/10/2000 12:35 PM ---------------------------
Pamela Perry@ENRON
03/09/2000 11:23 AM
To: Carol Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Enron Japan Trading Settlements
Carol,
In my research for Enron Japan and trading with Enron Online I spoke with
Dave Forester. He explained that the settlements for Enron Japan would be
handle by Enron North America and would be similar to OTC in Canada.
Would you be able to assist in getting a few questions answered concerning
the trading?
Who will be handling the Enron Japan Trading settlements?
Will they by settled in USD? and/or YEN? What will be the banking
requirements?
Will the wire transfer request for settlement be processed in Houston? Where?
What will be the standard settlement terms?
Please advise.
Thank you,
Pam | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We'll see you at about 4pm is that ok?
On cell 07778757656 - flying tonight.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Xuan Pollard" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:47 AM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: Re:
OK for 29th. Camille finishes school at 2.30pm on Tuesdays so why dont you
come over to west london and then have some supper so that Pierre can see
you when he gets back from work.
X
----- Original Message -----
From: Kitchen, Louise <[email protected]>
To: Xuan Pollard <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:54 PM
Subject: RE:
27th - Marcus family - first time they have seen Scott
30th - at the embassy all day for green card
So how about afternoon of 29th?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Xuan Pollard" <[email protected]>@ENRON
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 AM
> To: Kitchen, Louise
> Subject: Re:
>
> That is v soon but also v short. We are around those dates. Sunday 27 is
> cool. Monday 28th - am working, 29th working in the morning only and
> Wednesday 30th all day off.
> Quack
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kitchen, Louise <[email protected]>
> To: Xuan Pollard <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 PM
> Subject: RE:
>
>
> Hello
>
> We are coming over to get our green card done - hopefully anyway. We will
be
> in London 27th - 30th of January - are you around?
>
> Can't wait to see Camille and Alice.
>
> In a while - crocodile
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Xuan Pollard" <[email protected]>@ENRON
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 6:44 AM
> > To: Kitchen, Louise
> > Subject:
> >
> >
> > Happy new year!!! Hope you had a nice Xmas and new year. Thank you
so
> much for lovely presents. Alice adores her frog...it's a great idea.
When
> are you coming over? We are off to Megeve ( I think...) from the 15th
> March, kids at ski school/creche. We can fit more people into flat if
you
> are in the area.
> >
> > Later alligator
> >
> > X
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> _____________________________________
> > This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not
> the intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephone on 0207
> 351 5151 and ask for the sender. You should not copy it or use it for
any
> purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.
> >
> > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Richard Freeman &
Co
> does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message as
it
> has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect the message
may
> have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
> >
> > Richard Freeman & Co
> > 13 Radnor Walk
> > London SW3
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
> may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
> to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
> copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
> intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
> relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
> Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Enron AVAYA (formally Lucent Technologies) PBX & VoiceMail Outage for Enron
Center South Conversion
Due to the outstanding efforts of our ENRON and AVAYA teams, we were able to
complete both Phase I and Phase II of the project this past weekend. There
will be NO PHASE II TELEPHONE OUTAGE scheduled for this weekend.
Thank you for your cooperation.
==========================================================
Systems:
Enron Downtown Houston AVAYA Telephone & VoiceMail Systems
Affected Users:
All Enron Houston Downtown Telephone and VoiceMail Users
System Outage Duration: PHASE II
Enron Building, 500/600 Jefferson and Pennzoil April 6, 2001, 10:00PM - April
7, 2001, 4:00AM
Summary:
PHASE II April 6, 2001
Enron Building, 500 Jefferson, 600 Jefferson and Pennzoil Enron telephone
systems, including ALL voicemail users, will be totally out of service
beginning Friday evening, April 6th. The outage will begin at 10:00 PM on
Friday evening. The systems will be out of service until approximately 4:00
AM, Saturday morning, April 7th. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Notice Phy & Fin Index tabs have been added... | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
*** F E B R U A R Y P R O D U C T S P E C I A L ***
INO.com - Trusted by Traders the World Over
http://store.ino.com/
_____________________________________________________________________
THE SCIENCE OF AUTOMATIC OPTIONS PROFITS
- by Dr. K. Anand
Revolutionary Profit Miracle
For Options Traders Only!
9 Pages of FREE Information Available Now At:
http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/TWSP-Uncanny
<a href="http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/TWSP-Uncanny">UNCANNY 99.39% Accuracy!</a>
_____________________________________________________________________
Dear Andrew:
The pricing of options can be so complicated and confusing that
the scientists who've deciphered it received the Nobel Prize for
Economics in October 1997.
Yet, all their research boils down to providing one key number
that tells us how much the option price should change and lets us
find both undervalued and overvalued options.
This is the key secret used by most every professional options
trader to make enormous money and profits. It's much easier to
BUY LOW and SELL HIGH when you know which options are underpriced
and overpriced.
Introducing revolutionary trading system that utilizes this
simple concept in 4 profit proven option trading strategies.
Here's what you will learn:
* Basics Of Option Pricing
* Relationship Between Market Prices, Option Prices And Volatility
* Simulation of Volatility Disparities
* Equivalent Positions
* Delta Neutral Techniques
* 4 Proven Strategies with Specific Rules
* Historical Results
Order this amazing book and learn how Dr. Anand piled up 491
wins with only 3 losses and $730,566.72 in profits! We found
89 straight wins worth $408,949.66 in profits!
9 Pages of FREE Information Available Now At:
http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/TWSP-Uncanny
<a href="http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/TWSP-Uncanny">Uncanny Option Profits!</a>
_____________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER - CFTC RULE 4.41 - HYPOTHETICAL OR
SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN
LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD,
SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING.
ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE
RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE
IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS
LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN
GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE
DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO
REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR
IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFIT OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO
THOSE SHOWN.
View full disclaimer at bottom of this page:
http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/TWSP-Uncanny
_____________________________________________________________________
Thank you for subscribing to the Weekly Specials email
from INO.com. If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit:
http://www.ino.com/email/
To unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.ino.com/email/remove/[email protected]&list=special
-----Copyright <YEAR> INO.com. All Rights Reserved------ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Both deals have been changed. Jeff entered them incorrectly.
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/17/2000 01:21 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: apb check out
461487
461488
jeff
broker has sp15 on these deals | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates. , 2001 Carr Futures
The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.
Historical Sep Gas Cracks
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SepUnleadCrack50.pdf
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Tel: 312-368-6149
Fax: 312-368-2281
[email protected]
http://www.carrfut.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Rolo and I worked together in BA. Rolo did a great job for us, focusing
mostly on gas but he did do some work on power as well.
He is very bright and has a great work ethic. He has gained a fair amount of
commercial experience (including "trading" natural gas) in Argentina. I would
recommend him highly. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Chris,
Thanks for the invitation. Yes, I am interested in the training course.
I shall call Paul Bristow today. Please, give me some indication regarding
the dates.
Vince
Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director - Research
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Room EB1962
Houston, TX 77002-7361
Phone: (713) 853 3848
(713) 410 5396 (cell)
Fax : (713) 646 2503
"Chris Strickland" <[email protected]> on 02/06/2001 02:20:52 AM
Please respond to "Chris Strickland" <[email protected]>
To: "VinceJKaminski" <[email protected]>
cc: "Vince \(home\)" <[email protected]>
Subject: EPRM course
Hi Vince,
?
Hope you are fine. I hope that Grant's leaving?hasn't affected your group
too much?
?
EPRM's Paul Bristow has been in touch about a VaR training course involving
Les, yourself and I. Are you interested? We would be?extremely happy to work
with you. He was talking about London and Houston which I don't know if it
fits with your travel schedule. Maybe we can sort something out.
?
I hope to have the next article with you by early next week.
?
Best regards as always, and many thanks for your book promotional efforts!
?
Chris.
?
?
? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
...........................................................
Merchant Power Monthly ::
...........................................................
In just this month's issue, we have almost 4,000 MW of new plants documented!
- -
Plus, the records on who owns each plant, their
corporate
structure, ownership changes and even foreign plants.
Gleaned from FERC filings, we also provide you the
docket
number for each plant, so you can follow up and pull full
documentation on any which are of interest-- free! We
also provide you with feature stories on plants in
progress
from around the nation.
SPECIAL OFFER: Order Merchant Power Monthly for only
$196/year ($295/year if you require hardcopy) and
receive
FREE all of the back-issues of this millenium (in pdf
format
Every Exempt Wholesale Generator, Qualifying Facility,
Power Marketer Filing, since January 2000, and start your
subscription in March 2002, for only $196!
Save even more with a corporate pdf site license. Only
$1,000 for distribution to your entire company! Keep it
on
your server for access as required, rebroadcast it
yourself,
or give us the list of recipients and let us take care of
delivery for you-- your choice!
FOR THIS SPECIAL OFFER, YOU MUST ORDER BEFORE
March 15
For a sample issue, download:
<A
HREF="http://www.pmaconference.com/0202MPM.pdf">h
tt
p://www.pmaconference.com/0202MPM.pdf
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
email: [email protected]
voice: (703) 641-0613
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
...........................................................
...........................................................
This email has been sent to [email protected] at your request, by PowerMarketers.com.
Visit our Subscription Center to edit your interests or unsubscribe.
http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&[email protected]
View our privacy policy: http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp
Powered by
Constant Contact(R)
www.constantcontact.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Pereira, Susan W.
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:37 AM
To: '[email protected]@ENRON'
Subject: RE: Contract Price for Bazor Ridge Enron Contract 96045124
Stevens-
I don't think anything has changed. The transport rate is $.2421 + 0.3% fuel. The pricing is the average + $.01. I've emailed Tricia to see what the problem is.
Susan
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:53 AM
To: Pereira, Susan W.
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Contract Price for Bazor Ridge Enron Contract 96045124
Susan,
We have received our statement for September and the price has changed from
our original contract and what we have previously been paid. The statement
shows that we are being paid three different amounts for various volumes,
rather than the average of the three prices plus $.01. I have spoken with
Tricia Truong and she suggest I speak to you.
Also the transportation has changed on the statement. Has this changed?
Is something in error or has the contract changed?
Thank you,
Stevens
(601)969-1568 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
You speak from 8:30 - 10:00 - Dogwood Room on the 3rd floor. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 02:08 PM -----
Monica Edwards
06/26/2000 11:01 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Domingo Drakes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Contact Info for Erica Hamilton
Erica can be reached at 703-491-8005, or 2606 Woodfern Court, Woodbridge, VA
22192. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Daren,
I'm trying to put together the 2001 Operating Budget for the plant. I need a
conservative forecast, per month, of the price that could be obtained by
selling our excess volumes.
Thanks. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This was Mike Swerzbin's deal, and I guess he missed it yesterday. We just
entered it and backdated it for 1/4/01. Deal # is 490867.
thanks,
Kate
Stephanie Piwetz 01/05/2001 12:12 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MISSING DEAL?
Hello Kate-
El paso just called to verbal some deals and he had one that we did not have:
trade date 1/4/01
Enron Sells El Paso
Q2 2001
off peak 25mws
$175.00
Mid C
thru Natsource
Please check to see if good trade, did not give me trader name, Natsource did
not tell me of this trade last night in checkout. Thanks
Stephanie
7138539210 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
See your email re: contract/DA fix. I'm in office. Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
1) hesco additional collateral
2)Noresco - they want to focus on 10 or 20 years - can we get there? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is your last chance to sign up for any or all of three Westlaw classes
to learn new features, shortcuts and tips, and enhanced Public Records on
westlaw.com from a custom page on our legal portal
http://legaledge.corp.enron.com/ . Classes will be given by Michael
Springer, Westlaw Attorney tomorrow (5/31) at EB48C2. Lunch will be provided
by Westlaw. Please R.S.V.P. to Sylvia Hu x 36775 [email protected] by
C.O.B. of TODAY.
Free On-Site Training
for
Enron Legal
Where: Conference Room EB48C2
When: Thursday, May 31st
Class Schedule:
9:15 to 10:30 - Westlaw.com Functionality
learn shortcuts, tips, and tricks, to improve efficiency and accuracy
10:45 to 12:00 - Public Records Enhancements
see recent improvements in coverage and search-ability
12:15 to 1:30 - New Features on Westlaw.com
experience enhancements such as Table of Contents, Most Cited Cases, and
KeySearch - the Digests on Westlaw
These valuable research tools will be demonstrated by:
Michael C. Springer, JD/MBA
Westlaw Corporate Account Manager
Lunch will be provided by Westlaw.
Please RSVP to Sylvia Hu @ [email protected], or call 713-853-6775 before
Wed. 5/30. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jeff:
Robert and I wanted to follow up with you on your question about savings that
could be realized if 10% of lg. C&Is found other energy suppliers.
Please provide a bit more info. about what you are interested in:
*Would it be a subtraction of 10% of C&I load or customers?
*How precise do we need to be, i.e., can I estimate figures based on 1999
load?
It is probably best to reply via e-mail.
Thanks, Jennifer | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Rahil:
I have never commented favorably nor unfavorably about Kase's newsletter. I
think publishing independent market evaluations could be beneficial. The
more interesting content that is published, the better.
From: Rahil Jafry
08/28/2000 07:48 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline
Hey John,
We'd briefly spoken on the phone last week, but I haven't been able to come
by and talk to you like I'd promised. Louise had mentioned you did not like
Cynthia Kase's newsletter and may not want us to put Cynthia's weekly
summaries on EnronOnline.
Since Fred (Lagrasta) and his group think publishing her summaries on
EnronOnline will attract more of the smaller customers, would you have any
objection over us publishing the Kase newsletters.
Pls. let me know ASAP so we can proceed with this further.
Regds.,
Rahil
x. 3-3206 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/23/01. Please note that
NUI Utilities, Inc. has been placed on "No Trades".
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi There,
I love you, I hope you have a good day. Work is shaping up to be a real snooze-fest. There are only 9 of us on the entire trading floor right now. Normally there used to be about 65-70 of us!
Waking up with you is so nice, I am looking forward to many years of doing just that. I think we are going to settle in just fine together. I love you and enjoy being with you so much. You are the man I have waited all these years for. Thank you for being part of my life.
I will see you this evening, a little dinner, a little laundry action, maybe a little dominoes and sheet-she-me? Woohoo!
I love you,
CF | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 2/3/02; HourAhead hour: 14; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020314.txt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Email Alert
Internet Daily
for Tuesday, November 6, 2001
by Frank Barnako CBS MarketWatch.com
'New' Napster growth 'astounding'
Consumers transferred 1.81 billion digital media files using the
Kazaa, MusicCity and Grokster file-sharing applications during
October, according to industry analysts at Webnoize. Each of the
Web sites uses software licensed from FastTrack, a technology
company based in Amsterdam. By contrast, an estimated 1.57
million people were using Napster simultaneously in February,
while the FastTrack network clocked in last month with 1.3
million. "During the last four months the number of users
typically logged on has risen by 480%, and in November will
likely surpass Napster at its peak," said Webnoize senior
analyst Matt Bailey. "The growth of the FastTrack network
continues to be astounding."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aerie to revive Ricochet
Aerie Networks will restart the bankrupt Ricochet wireless
broadband service, but it didn't say when. Denver-based Aerie
announced Monday that it agreed to buy the assets of Metricom
Inc. for $8.25 million -- a mere fraction of the system's $1
billion cost. Before Metricom's financial demise, Ricochet
provided wireless data coverage in 17 cities and had 51,000
subscribers, according to Aerie president Mort Aaronson. "In
order to bring it back, we will create partnerships to provide
the service at a new lower price point than previously offered
and make it available to millions of users where they buy other
related products and services," Aaronson said.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo goes traditional for marketer
Yahoo Inc. announced the hiring of a 54-year-old "old economy"
executive to be its chief global marketing officer. John
Costello, most recently executive vice president of sporting
goods etailer MVP.com, has also worked in marketing with Sears
Roebuck & Co., Procter & Gamble, and Pepsi-Cola USA. "John is an
exceptional marketing executive with the depth and breadth of
experience necessary to lead Yahoo's global marketing team,"
said Greg Coleman, the Net giant's executive vice president of
North American operations, in a statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For late-breaking market news you can't afford to miss, go to
http://CBS.MarketWatch.com/
================================================================
LOGIN to access your account:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts
----------------------------------------------------------------
Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel. (0801-11478)
Copyright 2001 CBS MarketWatch. All rights reserved.
Commercial use or redistribution in any form, printed or
electronic, is prohibited.
Distribution by Quris, Inc. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Shirley,
Will you check with Vince on the support schedule for me? I need to get the
support to the BUs in order to get them to agree on the 2001 billing. If you
have any questions, call me. Thanx.
---------------------- Forwarded by Becky Pham/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 01:49 PM
---------------------------
Becky Pham
01/02/2001 11:12 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Allocation schedule
We spoke prior to the holiday and you were working on a list on support names
and projects that Research is working on for various BUs. Can you tell me
how you are doing on that? Sarah Brown, my manager, had a meeting with Corp
and they are disputing the billing we are proposing to bill to them ($1.9M).
Their argument is that they are going to bill ENA back anyway; therefore,
they have agreed to take 40% of the amount we intented to bill them in 2001,
which is approximately $760K. If you have any questions, please call. Thanx. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mary,
Please be careful of EOL deals. I got a call on Friday evening about this
deal being changed but you had already left.
It is a deal with Aquila and the volume was changed. Please check on this
and communicate all changes to Daren.
Thanks, Pat | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The time is rapidly approaching for PGS Energy Training's
early November seminars in downtown Houston.
Please forward this information to any one you know
who might benefit from a better understanding of weather
risk, energy derivatives, electricity trading, real options or
gas-to-electricity arbitrage. (See seminar list below.)
Our two featured seminars this week are PGS Energy Training's
"Fundamentals of Energy Derivatives" training program and the
"Managing Weather Risk with Weather Derivatives" seminar
which will be presented this November 8th by Dr. Geoffrey
Considine of e-Acumen - a leading authority in this field.
http://www.pgsenergy.com/schedule.html
Dr. Geoffrey Considine, is VP of Weather and Energy
Analytics for e-Acumen. Dr. Considine is a leading expert in
weather forecasting methodologies and the analytical aspects of
energy trading & weather derivatives. Recently the lead quantitative
analyst for Aquila's weather trading desk, Geoff is a well-recognized
figure in weather derivatives trading. He has extensive scientific and
industry credentials in analytical modeling, weather forecasting,
energy trading and weather derivatives.
For specific seminar dates, hotels and other information, call
412-279-9298 or visit http://www.pgsenergy.com/schedule.html
Available seminars include:
1) Fundamentals of Energy & Electricity Futures, Options
& Derivatives
2) Fundamentals of Electric Power Trading
3) Gas-to-Electricity Arbitrage & How to Maximize the
Profitability of Electric Generation Assets
4) Fundamentals of Statistical Analysis
5) How to Value Electric Generation Assets as Real Options
6) Managing Weather Risk with Weather Derivatives
Save money by bringing a group of 4 or more. With a group
rate, your cost for our $1,295 seminars is reduced to $895 per
attendee-- a savings of $1,600 from our regular prices. The
group price for the $695 programs is $495.
John Adamiak
PGS Energy Training | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks Chris - I assume you are speaking about credit risk on the thirty day
deal when you refer to the $2M exposure on $100 - has Tim spoken to John
about this? I am supportive of this proposal and approach. Like our
discussion, we have to find a way to be supportive to the re-development of
this market without creating un-acceptable credit or market losses. We also
have to support Lay's efforts in California.
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/19/2001
10:50 AM ---------------------------
Christopher F Calger
02/16/2001 06:11 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Freeman and CDWR
Dave,
I just spoke with Freeman to let him know that we can provide him a letter
proposal which I can send out Monday. In general, we will offer 50MW NP-15
Peak from February 22 - March 31 at a fixed price (currently $265) with
payment due every 7 days. This would be documented under the form of EEI
that they have agreed to and is subject to (i) payment of outstanding amounts
due Enron; (ii) execution of EEI and confirm; (iii) confirmation that they
will pay the amounts due; (iv) good faith obligation to put together
creidtworthy structure; (v) good faith look at term deal which can be
back-dated to blend with this current deal, Pastoria and Demand Management.
It took some time to nail down the settlement numbers on our side. Legal
spent some time with Freeman's attorney but got agreement on the EEI Form.
Credit likes this a lot. Tim will have Lavo wear the market exposure -
$2MM if the market falls $100. David Freeman said he would look at it Monday
but it sounded good.
I will pull it together and copy you over the weekend.
Chris | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
RTO Week
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Day 4 - October 18, 2001
Afternoon Session
Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices
Panelists for this discussion were: Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.
General Observations
The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the afternoon). FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions. There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go. Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward. There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future. On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.
FERC Deliverables
A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission. Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.
The first major topic was "How many RTOs? What is their scope?" All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language. N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.
The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?" Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent. Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.
The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward. They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?" General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas. Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further." Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.
One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design. Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry. The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:
? Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient? Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?
? Transmission Service - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?
? Loop Flows - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate? If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?
? Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts? Are there other solutions?
? Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?
? Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways? Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?
? Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses? Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?
? Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world? Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO? Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?
Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months. The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.
Now for a funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest. Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true." He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.
NERC and GISB
A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization. Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?" Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations. Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization. Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.
Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?). GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.
Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man. He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag. If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions. We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.
There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done. There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.
The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward. NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position. In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
[email protected]
713-345-3771 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: PHIL HOCHMUTH
on LINUX
11/20/01 - Today's focus: Putting a lid on the penguin
Dear Wincenty Kaminski,
In this issue:
* Protecting Linux
* Links related to Linux
* Featured reader resource
_______________________________________________________________
This newsletter sponsored by VeriSign - The Value of Trust
Do you need to encrypt all your online transactions? Secure
corporate intranets? Authenticate your Web site? Whatever
security your site needs, you'll find the perfect solution in
this FREE Guide from VeriSign, "Securing Your Web site for
Business." Get your copy today to learn the facts! Click here!
http://nww1.com/go/3500727a.html
_______________________________________________________________
TAKE IT OFF-LINE
The high-tech industry has always run at breakneck pace. Even a
wheezing economy will hardly slow it. In the past year,
business theory surrounding technology has been reinvented and
redefined multiple times. Check out the latest "must-read"
books for technology-related business theories.
http://nww1.com/go/ad204.html
_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: Putting a lid on the penguin
By Phil Hochmuth
Since you can't have enough security these days, Linux users
may want to check out LIDS, an open source tool for locking
down their Linux-based file and Web servers.
The LIDS (Linux Intrusion Detection System) Project is an open
source development effort that has spawned some code that could
be useful in protecting Linux file systems from hackers and
keeping critical Linux applications from being compromised.
According to its creators, LIDS can be used to protect a Linux
server from attacks such as "buffer overflow" and "string
format" attacks, which are used to disrupt a Linux system's
software with a barrage of requests and gain access to the
server's system files or applications.
LIDS is a patch for Linux kernel v. 2.4.14 or earlier, and adds
security features such as access control lists, which bolster
existing Linux control mechanisms for authenticating users to a
system. It is also designed to protect files and processes from
being changed or deleted, even by users with "root" or
administrative level access to a Linux system.
LIDS adds a port scanner detector to a Linux kernel, which can
be configured to detect intruders by identifying patterns of
activity on certain server ports, such as port 80 (HTTP), and
notifying an administrator of such events. The system also can
keep a log file of rule violations and other unauthorized
access attempts on server resources. An administration tool
included in the LIDS software is used to set system rules and
to designate what files and processes to protect.
_______________________________________________________________
To contact Phil Hochmuth:
Phil Hochmuth is a staff writer for Network World, and
a former systems integrator. You can reach him at
mailto:[email protected].
_______________________________________________________________
NW Fusion's BuyIT has the IT resources you need! Our directory
hosts thousands of qualified service providers. Post an RFP
anonymously and FREE, receive competitive bids, begin
negotiations, and get your project done right!
http://nwfusion.newmediary.com/nww110901nwltr1
_______________________________________________________________
RELATED EDITORIAL LINKS
Check out LIDS for yourself
http://www.lids.org/
Ramen Linux worm seen in wild
IDG News Service, 01/25/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0125ramen.html
Breaking Linux news from Network World and around the 'Net,
updated daily: http://www.nwfusion.com/topics/linux.html
Archive of the Linux newsletter:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/linux/index.html
______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE
Network World Fusion's The Edge site
Network World Fusion's The Edge is a resource devoted to the
advances in service-provider networks that are shaking up the
old telecom order. In classic Network World fashion, we focus
on the hardware, software and services coming to market - but
this time from the vendors targeting legacy carriers, new
alternative local carriers, ISPs and application service
providers. http://www.nwfusion.com/edge/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp
To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep
To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp
Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.
Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:[email protected]
For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Fusion Sales
Manager, at: mailto:[email protected]
Copyright Network World, Inc., 2001
------------------------
This message was sent to: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
For your information:
Vince Kaminski passed on to me the following California-related presentations
delivered at a recent conference he attended (Energy and Power Risk
Management, 5/14-5/15, Houston).
Please let me know if you would like a copy of any of these:
*Roach, Craig (Boston Pacific Company, Inc.), "Price Caps: An Apparent
Short-Term Solution That Creates Long-Term Problems"
(hard copy only)
*Wolak, Frank (Department of Economics, Stanford; Chairman, Market
Surveillance Ctte., CAISO),
1. "What Went Wrong with California's Re-Structured Electricity Market (and
How to Fix It)"
(ftp://zia.stanford.edu/pub/papers/california.print.pdf)
2. "How to Make Competitive Electricity Markets Benefit Consumers"
(hard copy only)
*Yeres, David (Partner, Clifford Chance Rogers & Wells, LLP), "Wholesale
Power Sales: A Marketplace Under Scrutiny"
(hard copy only)
Jennifer | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
BP wants comfort that EOTT is not wholly owned by Enron. A search of
corporate records indicates the following: The general partner of EOTT
Energy Canada Limited Partnership is EOTT Energy Corp. which is 100% owned
by Enron and the only limited partner is EOTT Energy Operating Limited
Partnership which is owned by ????? That is the question we would like
answered.
Very truly yours,
BILLY
Billy D. Dixon
Attorney
BP America Inc.
501 Westlake Park Blvd., Rm 16.166
Houston, Texas 77079
Direct 281/366-4745
Fax 281/366-5901
[email protected]
***IMPORTANT -- THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS HERETO ARE ATTORNEY-CLIENT
AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. If you have
received this email in error, do not under any circumstances read, forward,
copy, disseminate or save this email or any of its attachments. If you have
received this email in error, take the following actions: (1) reply to this
email indicating that you received this email in error, and (2) delete and
completely erase this email and its attachments from your computer and any
backup systems or "Deleted Items" folders.
-----Original Message-----
From: Heard, Marie [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: St. Clair, Carol; Jones, Tana
Subject: BP Master Netting Agreement
Mr. Dixon:
Pursuant to Carol St. Clair's request, I am attaching our preliminary
list of the agreements to be under the BP Master Netting Agreement.
Since we don't own 100% of EOTT, any master netting agreement involving
EOTT will not be under this master netting agreement.
Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything else.
Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone: (713) 853-3907
Fax: (713) 646-3490
[email protected]
<<BP Master Netting Agreement File
Index.doc>>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
What time are you arriving on Friday? We got box seats to the Bears game on
Sunday.
DG | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The Government Affairs group is involved in diverse and complex activities. Tracking and quantifying these activities is important for several obvious reasons - to keep upper management apprised of our activities; to illustrate the value added and risk managed by our group; and to keep each other properly informed so that we can better coordinate our efforts.
Currently, these activities take place on an ad-hoc manual basis, which is time-consuming and inefficient. We have a tool already in place to track our activities - the Project Tracking database in Lotus Notes. Currently this application is used primarily for RCR's, but beginning November 1, 2001, the Government Affairs group will use this application to track all projects and efforts - replacing the need for manual updated spreadsheets and activity quantification "fire-drills". The Projects have several features to allow capture of sub-sets of information, including Updates, Risk, Origination and Valuation.
** Please note that this will become the only way that we'll gather this information. In other words, if you don't enter your data into Project Tracking, we won't know what you're doing! **( all other reports will be eliminated)
The current Lotus Notes application will be discontinued as of October 31,2001 and will be converted to a web-based product. You'll find the web-based version as easy or even easier to use than Lotus Notes. Additionally, conversion to a new database structure will allow for more versatile report extraction.
Before the conversion of the project data from Lotus Notes to Oracle, we need to do some data cleanup. Please expect a call in the next two weeks from Elizabeth Linnell, Bryan Gottfredson, or Darran Binns to schedule some time with you in person or on the phone regarding your current project list, additional projects to add, and a brief overview of the new system. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions and/or concerns. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Steve:
Please review and edit as needed. I'm on my way to airport to return to SF.
If you need me, please page.
Best,
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Peter Mims called this a.m.. He reviewed the documents we sent yesterday and seemed pleased. We wants more detail on the specific section pertaining to "clearing" of orders.
I spoke with Leonardo Pacheco who suggested we meet with Kevin Montagne (he reports directly to Jay Webb and is the Sr. Director in charge of IT E-Commerce.)
I've left a voice mail to get on his calendar on Monday for a meeting with Peter and Bill. Do you want to attend if I get time with him?
Thanks. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please move the names_jlavora.nsf and jorunal_jlavora.nsf files to the
appropriate locations on his mail server (nahou-lnmai16). You can either hit
me on the Nextel (56517) or page me (713-327-9348) when this is ready, so I
can complete his iPAQ installation.
Thanks
-Mike Hernandez | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mark Taylor has a one-way messaging pager.
to leave a numeric message: 1-877-855-2081
To send an email message: [email protected]
Thanks!
Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/17/2001 02:37 PM -----
"US Publishing" <[email protected]>
05/17/2001 03:13 PM
Please respond to brice
To: "RT Reader" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Restructuring Today, Thursday May 17, 2001
(see attached file: rt010517.pdf)
Thank you,
Season Hawksley
US Publishing
800-486-8201
- rt010517.pdf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I need to talk about how to handle CES storage in Sitara and Unify.
The people that need to be their are Jeff, Mark, Victor, and one ot the CGAS
schedulers. Please let me know if you can meet tomorrow afternoon around
2:30 pm.
Everyone else is more than welcome to attend. Please let me know if you will
be attending.
I will schedule a conference room after I know who is attending. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sherri:
2:00PM on the 18th of April is fine for Vince Kaminski.
His "bio" is attached. If you need anything else, please let me know.
Shirley
Enron North America Corp.
From: Sherri Sera @ ENRON 04/11/2000 03:42 PM
To: Bert Frazier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Jewel Meeks/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Proposed Darden Interview Schedule - April 18
Ladies, I'm trying to finalize this schedule prior to my vacation 4/13-14.
Please confirm that the time proposed below will work for your executive.
Additionally, would you please e-mail me a bio for your executive; the
professors have requested it.
Thanks for your help. SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2000
03:37 PM ---------------------------
From: Sherri Sera 03/31/2000 05:15 PM
To: Gene Humphrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bert Frazier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Jewel Meeks/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Proposed Darden Interview Schedule - April 18
Below is proposed schedule for the Darden case video-taped interviews; an
hour has been scheduled for each of you (except Vince, for whom 1-1/2 hours
has been requested), however, you may be finished in less time. The location
is yet to be determined, but will most likely take place in a vacant office
of 50M.
Please let me know of any conflicts with this proposed schedule. I'll send
along additional information as it becomes available. Thank you and have a
nice weekend. SRS
8:00a Gene Humphrey
9:00a Lou Pai
10:00a Ken Rice
11:00a Andy Fastow
12:00p Break
2:00p Vince Kaminski
3:30p Jeff Skilling | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Mims, Patrice L.
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:42 PM
To: Pollan, Sylvia S.
Subject: FW: NEW ENRONONLINE FUNCTIONALITY
-----Original Message-----
From: Puthigai, Savita
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:47 PM
To: EOL Non North America Traders; EOL North America Traders
Cc: EOL Call Center; EOL Marketing Europe; EOL Product Control Group, Enron Sydney; Product Control - Houston; Webb, Jay; Richter, Brad; Enron London - EOL Product Control Group,; Carter, Carl; Pacheco, Leonardo; Renaud, Lindsay; Gonzales, Francis; Mandola, Teresa
Subject: NEW ENRONONLINE FUNCTIONALITY
In order to continually develop and make improvements to the functionality of EnronOnline we are rolling out several changes tonight, which will be in effect on Monday August 20, 2001. Some of these changes will affect Stack Manager while others affect the Website. A summary of these changes is listed below.
Stack Manager Changes
Top of Stack limit orders - This feature will allow the price submitted via limit orders to be displayed on the website if their bid or offer is better than the trader's stack price. Stack Manger will list the price and the names of counterparties submitting such orders on the floated stack window. Orders will be queued by price and time stamp. When a counterparty trades on a " Top of Stack Entry" it will create back to back transactions; one between Enron and the counterparty submitting the order, and the other between Enron and the counterparty clicking on the website.
In order to turn on this functionality select the " Allowed Top of Stack" option, in the Orders section of the product properties page. If regular limit order functionality is desired the "Allowed" option should be selected.
Please note that this feature will be released in a disabled mode and will be turned on sometime next week after determining which business units want to roll this out.
Restricted Top of Stack limit orders - This feature will allow the price submitted only by internal traders via limit orders to be displayed on the website if their bid or offer is better than the trader's stack price. Stack Manger will list price and the names of counterparties submitting such orders on the floated stack window. Orders will be queued by price and time stamp. When a counterparty trades on a " Top of Stack Entry" it will create back to back transactions one between Enron and the counterparty submitting the order, and the other between Enron and the counterparty clicking on the website.
In order to turn on this functionality select the " allowed as Restricted Top of Stack" option, in the Orders section of the product properties page. If regular limit order functionality is desired the "Allowed" option should be selected. If a product has active orders against it you will not be able to select the "Restricted Top of Stack" feature.
Advanced Filtering Ability on All Products Tab - Drop down filtering capability is now available for each field in the All Products tab in stack manager. In order to filter click on the arrow next to the field title. A drop down box with a list of attributes will appear. Highlight the attribute by which you wish to filter. To turn off the filter click on the arrow and select the " All" option from the drop down box.
Website Changes
New Submission Screen for Restricted Top of Stack Limit Orders - The submission screen for products that allow Top of Stack or Restricted Top of Stack limit orders is as follows.
The submit button on the left makes a submission for a normal transaction, while the button on the right will submit as a limit order. In case of the Restricted Top of Stack limit orders only internal traders will see the new submission box.
Price of Limit Orders
Modify Limit Orders
Customers now have the ability to modify the price of any active order. In order to do so highlight the order to be modified and use the plus or minus sign next to the price field on at the top of the "Today's Orders" section. The price will move up or down in the same increments as the tick size for that product. Once the price is at the desired level click the "Set" button and the price will be modified. Another way to modify the price on a limit order is to click on the price field on a particular limit order. You will see a box with plus, minus and set buttons that allow you to modify that order.
Expiration time for Limit Orders
Customers can now place limit orders with expiration times of up to 30 days. Currently they may place orders for only up to 12 hours.
Float the Today's Orders Section
You can now float the " Limit Order " section. In order to do so, right click in the "Today's Orders " section and select the float window option. In order to make the window " Stay On Top " right click on the floated window and select the stay on top option.
Mid Market Client - Mid market originators will now have the ability to transact on behalf of their customers, while including their desired margin on the trade, on EnronOnline products. In order to do so Click on the bid or offer price, a customised submission window will appear. Select the counterparty for whom you wish to transact from a drop down list , enter the desired customer price and margin and click submit. For example if a customer wants to buy Nymex Sep 01 at 3.36 and you wish to have a 1 cent margin, please enter 3.36 as the desired price and 0.01 as the margin. The system will trade the order when the EnronOnline offer for Nymex Sep 01 is at 3.35, book the trade at 3.36 and record the 0.01 origination amount.
In order to be set up to use this functionality. Please call the EnronOnline Product Control Group.
Changes to Website Passwords - As an added security measure, which has been requested by many customers, some new password rules have been instituted. First, the password cannot be equal to the login ID. Second, each user will be prompted to change his password every 90 days. These rules apply to all website passwords for both internal and external users.
Please note Stack Manager changes will be available all traders as of Monday August 20, 2001. The changes to the website will be rolled out to a few internal users on Monday with the rest of the internal users being upgraded Monday night, and external users by the end of the week. Over the next couple of weeks all users will be prompted to change their website passwords.
If you have any questions regarding these changes please contact me at 713-853-1787.
Savita Puthigai
<Embedded Paintbrush Picture> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I can certainly send you this file each day - I hope it can be of some help.
All the deals it lists are with EPMI Short Term California, which is myself
or Jeff Richter; so I'm not sure how helpful it will be in determining which
desk or counterparty you have discrepancies with. While we're on the subject
of sharing files, though, I had spoken with the confirmation group in Houston
about the deal file you send them each day. They suggested I ask to be added
to the list so I can better assist their group in finding discrepancies in
EPMI-EES deals. If that's okay with you, I would appreciate receiving it.
In the meantime, I'll copy you on the EES sale prices starting tomorrow.
Thanks,
Kate
Judy Dyer@EES
01/29/2001 02:40 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EPMI-EES Sale Prices
Kate,
I am in the confirmation group with EES and try to tie out our confirmtions
with the EPMI list I receive from Kim Hundle (EPMI), on a weekly basis. This
file would be great help with this process. Is there any way you could send
this to me as well? This would help me determine who the problem is with. I
would appreciate it.
Thanks
Judy D | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 11/19/01. The Yuma Companies (Inc.) has been added to this week's "Call Credit" column.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923, Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or Darren Vanek at x3-1436. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Peter,
Mark took a look at your termination and he thought it looked fine.
Actually, he liked your termination and release better than the language we
have in our form, so we're changing our form. You are the man!
I checked the New York law when I drafted the termination so you're ok
there.
I'll be out all next week, my Mom's coming into town for the Thanksgiving
holidays. If you need to get hold of me my assistant will have my cell phone
number (since it's NYMEX bid week and both Mark and I will be out, I have to
be reachable. Mark will have an international cell phone with him, he's
sailing in the Caribbean, so if you need to get hold of him for any reason,
Taffy will have the number).
Let me know if I can be of further help today! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Correction:
This length is for Monday only.
JMF
---------------------- Forwarded by John M Forney/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 06:16
PM ---------------------------
From: John M Forney on 11/10/2000 04:11 PM
To: Portland Shift
cc:
Subject: Length at Montana System (Colstrip) to be sold on 11/13
Please remember to sell off this length on Sunday and Monday.
JMF
---------------------- Forwarded by John M Forney/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 06:13
PM ---------------------------
Cara Semperger
11/09/2000 07:46 AM
To: Portland Shift, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Donald Robinson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana
Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Length at Montana System (Colstrip) to be sold on 11/13
Good Morning,
Smurfit Stone is ramping down their plant by 5 mw's beginning at HE 6 on
11/13. The source for them is PGE@Colstrip. Please sell off this additional
5 mw's for HE6 thru HE24 on the 13th.
The Smurfit Deal number is 268656.1
The Portland Deal number is 403522.1
The real time position manager will reflect this length.
Thanks,
Cara | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 10:33 AM -----
"EEI Energy Delivery Group" <[email protected]>
10/12/2000 03:17 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RTO FILINGS SUMMARIES
EEI Presents . . .
RTO Summaries: The October Filings
Full summaries of the October RTO Filings, available in pdf format, no later
than October 30, 2000. Order Today!
RTO Summaries: The October Filings
This timely, essential, cost-effective resource will include:
? Introduction and Summary Matrix of Each RTO filing
? Coverage for each RTO filing:
- Each of the twelve characteristics and functions
- What is proposed
- How it comports with Order No. 2000
- Additional Comments
? Summary of individual company filings to join an RTO or alternative filing
? Individual map of each RTO
Plan Ahead and Order EEI's RTO Summaries: The January Filings Now.
Buy both sets and save.
RTO Summaries: The October Filings
Item # 13-00-14
List Price: $995.00
EEI Associate Members: $895.00
EEI Utility Members: $795.00
Government: $195.00
RTO Summaries: The January Filings
Item # 13-00-05
List Price: $995.00
EEI Associate Members: $895.00
EEI Utility Members: $795.00
Government: $195.00
RTO Summaries: The October and January Filings
Item # 13-00-06
List Price: $1895.00
EEI Associate Members: $1695.00
EEI Utility Members: $1495.00
Government: $295.00
Ordering information:
Call EEI at 1-800-EEI-5453 (U.S. & Canada) or 301-645-4222 (International) to
place your order. Once payment has been received, a pdf file will be
e-mailed to you.
Product Questions:
Contact Jay Carriere at (202) 508-5525 or [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Richard,
Marcus told me that wanted to refer to you and me the above-referenced new MG
Metals matter. Briefly, ICTS of Athens, Alabama, one of MG Metals' shipping
agents, has reportedly gone into bankruptcy, without paying about $80,000
owed to various motor carriers (truckers) for transportation here in the U.S
of MG Metal's aluminum. No one has yet confirmed that ICTS has in fact gone
into bankruptcy.
MG Metals' offices in Canada and New York have begun receiving truckers'
demand letters for these freight charges, some of which are from attorneys
threatening suit. These letters state that as consignee of the various
cargoes, MG Metals is primarily liable for payment of the freight charges. I
think that this is generally correct as a matter of U.S. law, given the usual
motor carrier bills of lading, although I am having this double-checked.
Since we have already paid most (but not all) of the money we owed to ICTS,
MG Metals is looking at a double-payment exposure. Also, even to the extent
that ICTS has not been paid, it is entirely possible that ICTS overextended
itself with a particular trucker and failed to charge MG Metals for enough to
cover both ICTS's commission and the trucker's freight charges; in other
words, a trucker may be looking for MG Metals to pay it more in freight than
MG Metals originally agreed to pay ICTS (which amount should have covered
both freight and commission).
I believe that the largest single amount claimed by a trucker is $15,000.
Bob Klide of MG's New York office and Nicole Dion of MG's Canada office (no
relationship to Celine--I asked) will be shortly sending me their files.
To complicate things a bit more, many of the letters Nicole has received deal
with shipments made in March, at a time when Nicole and her office were
employees of a trading division of Barclay's. Some time afterward, they were
acquired by MG Metals. As a result of this, Barclay's may (depending on the
agreement between Barclay's and MG Metals) be on the hook for some of this
liability. Nicole advises she has place a Barclay's representative on notice.
I would be happy to take this one off your plate if you would like.
Obviously, it is a small dollar case and we don't want to pay any money to
anyone unless we absolutely have to. Let me know.
Britt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I need ASAP (today please) a credit worksheet for this company.
Thanks!
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 12/08/00 09:25 AM -----
[email protected]
12/08/00 07:51 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Harry and David Shipment Acknowledgment
Dear CAROL STCLAIR,
Thank you for ordering from Harry and David.
This e-mail is to let you know that the following item(s) shipped on
12/7/2000:
Order Number: 0300216691
SUZANNE CAVER was shipped BEAR CREEK BANQUET via UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Please allow 7 business days for delivery.
LYNNE SMITH was shipped FAVORITES BASKET via UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Please allow 7 business days for delivery.
MARK TAYLOR was shipped CHOCOLATE-LOVER'S TOWER via UNITED STATES POSTAL
SERVICE
Please allow 7 business days for delivery.
Items may be shipped separately. This notice only reflects items which have
shipped today.
We hope we have the opportunity to help you shop again soon:
www.harryanddavid.com
To e-mail our Customer Service Department: www.harryanddavid.com/orders.html | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
continental.com Specials for Kevin Ruscitti
Wednesday, November 21, 2001
****************************************
CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS
Continental Airlines wishes you a safe and Happy Thanksgiving. Due to the holiday, continental.com Specials will not be available this week.
OnePass members* can register to earn up to 20,000 OnePass miles by purchasing your eTickets on continental.com - and that?s in addition to your actual flight miles. Visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9tzivq1mjl%7Cvkkv_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%2FA
for all the details and to purchase your eTickets today.
*You can enroll instantly in OnePass, our award winning frequent flyer program at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9tzivq1mjl%7Cvkkv_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9-A
(Note: this offer does not apply to continental.com Specials fares.)
FRIENDS & FAMILY SALE
Continental makes it easy to get together with friends & family. Whether you're planning a quick visit or a holiday reunion, continental.com saves you time and money. We're offering 10% off select sale fares in North America & Europe when you book online through December 4, 2001.
Visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9tzivq1mjl%7Cvkkv_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%2CA
to purchase your eTickets today.
Travel Updates
Be sure to check continental.com at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9tzivq1mjl%7Cvkkv_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%2BA
before leaving for the airport. We're looking forward to welcoming you onboard!
---------------------------------------
This e-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary products of Continental Airlines, Inc. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly prohibited.
****************************************
If you need assistance please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9tzivq1mjl%7Cvkkv_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%27A
View our privacy policy at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9tzivq1mjl%7Cvkkv_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9*A
This e-mail was sent to: [email protected]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
We hope you will find continental.com Specials a valuable source of information. However, if you prefer not to take advantage of this opportunity, please let us know by visiting the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9tzivq1mjl%7Cvkkv_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%28A
TO SUBSCRIBE:
Please visit the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9tzivq1mjl%7Cvkkv_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%29A | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
um ok.
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:
nope, and stop
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:
isn't that being too nice? so i am freaking out about my job again. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
How can the contractual currency be USD and the invoicing be in FF as
indicated below. I guess I don't really care what currency is used as ECTRIC
will be responsible for hedging its currency risk with Hickerson; however,
shouldn't the contractual and termination currency be the same?
From: Sara Shackleton on 11/30/2000 10:26 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SITA
Tanya: Is Lee the right person to approve this change for SITA? Remember,
SITA is acutally with ECTRIC (nto ENA) and SITA wanted to settle in Euros.
Thanks. Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 10:23 AM -----
Lee Munden
11/30/2000 09:44 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SITA
Sara
Sorry for delayed response.
Tom says below that the invoice is likely to be in French Francs (FF) ,
therefore, I would have thought that having contractual currency as FF (or
Euro as / when it replaces the FF) is the most sensible.
As the early termination value is likely to be calculated in FF or Euro, I
think that this would not be a problem either.
Please feel free to give me a call if you wish to discuss 207 783 6755
regards
Lee
---------------------- Forwarded by Lee Munden/LON/ECT on 30/11/2000 15:41
---------------------------
Enron Europe
From: Tom Bruce-Jones 29/11/2000 08:13
To: Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SITA
FF
Lee Munden
27/11/2000 18:04
To: Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SITA
Tom
What currency will we invoice in?
Lee
Enron Europe
From: Tom Bruce-Jones 27/11/2000 16:07
To: Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SITA
Lee
As you are perhaps aware, the Master for this CP has been arranged thru
Houston. Would you cast your eye over the comments laid out below and revert
to either Sara or Tanya with your comments.
As background, Houston has negotiated all the docs and were intending to
trade out of Houston. This CP has now been handed over to us and all trades
will be generated from here.
Any help much appreciated.
Tom
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT on 27/11/2000
16:06 ---------------------------
From: Michael Moulton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 27/11/2000 06:57 PST
To: Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SITA
----- Forwarded by Michael Moulton/Enron Communications on 11/27/00 06:05 AM
-----
Sara Shackleton@ECT
11/22/00 01:41 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael Moulton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: SITA
Tanya:
SITA now insists on having the Termination Currency and the Contractual
Currency, except as otherwise agreed in any Transaction/Confirmation, as the
Euro. They will not agree to USD. [By the way, SITA's lawyers had already
agreed to USD] Effectively, if we agree to this, the trader will need to
confirm each deal in USD (Contractual Currency) but if we early terminate,
the currency will be Euro's (Termination Currency).
What do you want to do? Other than the Enron Corp. guaranty, we are finished.
Sara | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000
10:44 AM ---------------------------
Michael Etringer
07/26/2000 08:32 AM
To: Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Price for Stanfield Term
I am sending off a follow-up to a bid I submitted to Clark County PUD. They
have requested term pricing for Stanfield on a volume of 17,000. Could you
give me a basis for the period :
Sept -00 - May 31, 2006
Sept-00 - May 31, 2008
Since I assume you do not keep a Stanfield basis, but rather a basis off
Malin or Rockies, it would probably make sense to show the basis as an
adjustment to one of these point. Also, what should the Mid - Offer Spread
be on these terms.
Thanks, Mike | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hey it's too late for you. There was a Thursday night game and your rules state, and I quote "During weeks of Thursday night games, all picks will need to be in by noon on Thursday." Therefore see you later, and thanks for playing. Sorry, but rules are rules. Happy Hour Friday 10/26.
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Bob [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Bevans, Larry; Dave Heinemen; Dougherty, Nathan; Jernigan, Steven ;
Jerry Padilla; Joey Brewer; LoreLei Reid; Paul Lucci; Pike, Steven;
Turner, Robert; Williams, Bob; Woodruff, Alexander
Subject: Bob Picks Indy
Get you picks in. Also please note Larry Bevans will be receiving the picks
next week, I will be out of town. Larry's e-mail address is
[email protected]. Don't forget if you don't send something to me you
are out of the pool. Bob
******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
****************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Listed below are the dates for the 2002 UAF meetings.
Southeast UAF mmetings:
Time 1:30PM - 3:30PM
Houston Location: EB30C2
January 29th
February 26th
March 26th
April 30th
May 28th
June 25th
July 30th
August 27th
September 24th
October 29th
November 26th
North and Southwest UAF mmetings:
Time 1:30PM - 3:30PM
Houston Location: EB30C2
January 30th
February 27th
March 27th
April 1st May
May 29th
June 26th
July 31st
August 28th
September 25th
October 30th
November 27th | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
04:32 PM ---------------------------
Jim Garven <[email protected]> on 01/26/2000 12:49:29 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LSU seminar visit
Vince,
Please send a package of article reprints to the attention of Joan Payne at
the following address:
Joan Payne
Department of Finance
E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration
Louisiana State University
2163 CEBA
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
In your package, please indicate which presentation each reprint is
intended for; i.e., whether it is for student consumption on Thursday
afternoon or finance faculty/doctoral student consumption on Friday
morning. Joan can make sure that we get the right number of copies
produced for the respective audiences.
Concerning powerpoints-- just email these files to me and if it is all
right with you I will make them available for download by the faculty and
students on the class and research seminar webpages.
Thanks again for being willing to visit LSU and present your knowledge to
our faculty and students.
Sincerely,
Jim Garven
At 01:39 PM 1/18/2000 +0000, you wrote:
>Jim,
>
>I can send you copies of the reprints of some papers I wrote
>or co-authored. Please, let me know how many copies do you need.
>
>I shall prepare power point presentations for the student meeting
>and for the faculty meeting.
>
>For the students: review of my group (things we work on) with an intention
>of generating some interest among the students and soliciting resumes.
>
>For the faculty meeting: challenges that energy markets pose to financial
>modeling.
>I shall be able to E-mail the Power Point presentations later this month.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>Jim Garven <[email protected]> on 01/17/2000 04:00:25 PM
>
>To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
>cc:
>Subject: Re: LSU seminar visit
>
>
>
>Dear Vince,
>
>Would you mind emailing to me a short biography/vita sometime when you get
>a chance? Also, if you have a paper to circulate or any PowerPoint slides
>that you'll want to use either in your presentations to my students
>Thursday afternoon, 2/3, or to the faculty seminar on Friday morning, 2/4,
>please email these to me. This would be greatly appreciated.
>
>My colleagues and I are looking forward to your visit on Feb. 3-4 to LSU.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Jim Garven
>
>
>_________________________________________
>James R. Garven
>William H. Wright, Jr. Endowed Chair for Financial Services
>Department of Finance
>2158 CEBA
>E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration
>Louisiana State University
>Baton Rouge, LA 70803-6308
>
>Voice (225) 388-0477 | Fax: (800) 859-6361
>
>E-mail: [email protected]
>Home Page: http://garven.lsu.edu
>Vita: http://garven.lsu.edu/dossier.html
>Research Paper Archive: http://garven.lsu.edu/research.html
>_________________________________________
_________________________________________
James R. Garven
William H. Wright, Jr. Endowed Chair for Financial Services
Department of Finance
2158 CEBA
E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA 70803-6308
Voice (225) 388-0477 | Fax: (800) 859-6361
E-mail: [email protected]
Home Page: http://garven.lsu.edu
Vita: http://garven.lsu.edu/dossier.html
Research Paper Archive: http://garven.lsu.edu/research.html
_________________________________________
- att1.htm | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
David and Pablo
I realize it is too late for changes and I support the Manifesto as is.
However, for the record I like to point out that the list of stakeholders
that must come to new arrangements (bottom of page 5) should have included
the utilititie's holding companies that siphoned the CTC funds out of the
state to purchase generation assets in other parts of the country. Given
that the stranded costs are way below what was predicted they should share
some of the pain by refunding at least a portion of the CTC collection.
Shmuel
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "David Teece" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: FINAL MANIFESTO
>
> David & Pablo:
>
> Substantively, the final version looks fine to us. I happened to notice a
> couple of typos/grammatical items:
>
> 1. Creditworthiness is typically seen as one word. Corrections
would
> be be needed as follows: page 3, in both the 4th and 5th paragraphs, and
> on page 5 in the second paragraph.
>
> 2. Also on page 5, I think the second sentence of the first
paragraph
> would read better as follows: "Unfortunately, the utilties have already
> divested many of their generation plants...."
>
> 3. Finally, on page 6, last sentence of the 4th full paragraph, the
> word should be especailly not specially.
>
> Thanks again for a terrific job of pulling all this together.
>
> Mitch Wilk
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thank you.
Jennifer Thome
06/21/2001 05:12 PM
To: Mike Zenker <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected], (bcc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron)
Subject: Meeting next week
Mike:
I am sorry to hear that you will be unable to meet next week, but definitely
understand. Actually, it looks like my colleague Jeff Dasovich would not
have been able to make it either. I would still like to meet with Peter if
that is convenient for him. I will follow up with a call to him directly.
I hope we can try to arrange another meeting soon.
Thanks,
Jennifer | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I apologize for not returning the call. I discussed the issue further with Melissa M. and Kimberly H.
I think we currently have two separate issues:
First:
Melissa and Kimberly H. I think would prefer to have one paragraph of settlement language to use on all power financial confirms (rather than the two current versions) so they could have a "one size fits all" description that still addressed the two types of deals - 1) deals less than one month and 2) deals one month and greater. Melissa - can you confirm if this is the idea behind what we discussed?
Second:
The language being used currently actually requires I invoice separately the two classes of deals (as specified above) - because the language we uses makes deals less than one month due on the fifth workday of the month and makes Month + deals due on the seventh business day because indices are not known until second workday. Invoicing these types of deals separately would be more time consuming that any benefit that would result. I have yet another challenge - I have a counterparty that demands their remittance period of five days starts over if the index is revised after original publication. Then I have Williams (who we exchange paper with - confirms are not signed) - who puts net 10 on all their deals. I really cannot come to a solution. I have only a handful of power counterparties - they end up doing both classes of deals - and the settlement date becomes a negoiation every month. This is the going to be the third month my department has been responsible for this area - so the whole situation is rather new. So at this time I think the probability of solving my problem is remote. So while I appreciate your offer of assistance - I am not entirely sure what to do. Given the other priorities I have right now - addressing these is going to be in the future for me.
I have not had an external request to change the language. I think the main request was from confirms and my issue(s) are secondary - and for which I have no good solution.
I apologize for the long email - I am trying to do this from home to get caught up.
Thanks
Evelyn
-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Tue 11/27/2001 1:21 PM
To: Aucoin, Evelyn
Cc: Hundl, Kimberly; Theriot, Kim S.
Subject: payment date for financial power transactions
Evelyn:
I left a voice mail for you in mid-November inquiring about your request for language in financial power confirms (same counterparty) for payment upon termination of deals rather than aggregation of multiple deals with payment at the end of a calendar month. Credit is inquiring as to whether this request is internal or external.
Can you please call and explain the issues?
Thanks.
Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX 77002
Ph: (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached please find the complaint for Bustamante v. Dynegy, et al.
<<Bustamante v. Dynegy.cmplt.pdf>>
=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.
To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
[email protected]
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com
- Bustamante v. Dynegy.cmplt.pdf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Ladies,
What's the status on this registration? The customer is eager to receive
transaction status (calls fairly often so I would call that "eager").
Thanks,
Griff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I believe there is a potential "anti-trust" issue brewing at BPA. I know BPA
is subject to different rules than most other entities, however, I have
sought to understand how they are acquiring power from customers, or allowing
some customers to install small scale generation and BPA buys that power,
without it hitting the federal transmission system.
It may not be an issue in as much as Enron, or other marketing entities, may
not want to compete with BPA to purchase power from these small generation
units.
However, if we were interested in buying this energy that's too bad because
we can't get access to it.
BPA's Power Business Line (PBL) is making arrangements with local utilities
and with those utilities industrial customers through which the customer
installs small generation units and the PBL is purchasing the output. In this
instance the customers load is not reduced. BPA is concerned that if the
customer reduces load they (BPA) will lose revenue, as will the host utility
(distribution costs). So the concept is that the generator simply continue to
buy "priority firm" energy through the host utility and they sell the output
of the small generator to BPA. But, because it takes so long to get through
BPA's Transmission Business Line's (TBL's) interconnection and system study
process, the PBL is simply going around that process. This treats the output
as though it is going to BPA's grid without reducing the host utilities load.
However, the PBL is not seeking to "interconnect" these loads with the
federal grid because it takes too long to do that.
If Enron wants to buy power from a small generator, either Enron or the host
utility or the industrial customer will have to go through BPA's extensive
analysis process. In one instance I am aware of, the industrial customer
would like to get a market price for the output of their generator but BPA is
telling them they will only pay a price much lower than market ($90-110 MWhr)
for the next year. The generator feels they are held hostage to BPA's offer
because they are not able to get onto the federal transmission network.
Seems like anti-trust to me. Or, at a minimum, self-dealing which I believe
FERC has sought to avoid.
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
yes...we can identify components via supporting consolidating statements (relatively "easy");
or, we can separate those components out and re-prepare as legal entity only(more time consuming).
-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:11 AM
To: Saunders, James; Howard, Kevin A.; Geaccone, Tracy
Cc: Walters Jr., Harry; Cobb Jr., John; Sutton, Lisa
Subject: Re: NNG/Dynegy Due Diligence
Can't we identify the impacts of the non nng stuff in the financials?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Body Shop Members:
On Saturday, June 10th, portions of the Body Shop will be closed for
approximately 90 days to build the pillar supports for the Enron Center Sky
Bridge. This construction will necessitate the closure/relocation of Studio
B, the free weight area and massage therapy services.
Many of the Yoga, Tai Chi, and Abs Lab classes previously held in Studio B
will be moved to Studio A. Because of space constraints the free weight area
will be relocated to the Massage Therapy room and Massage Therapy services
will be transferred to the Health Center on the 3rd floor of the Enron
building for the duration of the construction project.
A new class schedule is attached for your convenience.
Thank you for your patience and understanding during this inconvenient yet
necessary construction project.
The Body Shop | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000
09:31 PM ---------------------------
Susan M Lewis@ENRON
07/19/2000 01:58 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dinner with ENA Associates & Analysts
David, your message was probably intended for Susan R. Lewis (who I believe
has left the company). Just an FYI for you to take her off your distribution
list (and me too)!!
Susan M. Lewis
39712
Enron North America Corp.
From: David W Delainey 07/19/2000 01:56 PM
Sent by: Beverly Stephens
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gaurav Babbar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sean
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ross
Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc Sabine/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brandon Wax/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mo
Bawa/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Chaney/CAL/ECT@ECT, Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Raimund Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jurgen Hess/LON/ECT@ECT, Nicole
La/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Lewis/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eva Rainer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jason Seigal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, John King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gabriel Monroy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer Reside/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erin Willis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Jachimiak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homer Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
McCarthy/LON/ECT@ECT, Purvi Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reza
Rezaeian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Scarborough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rhonna Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Christy
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felicia Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ana Alcantara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Dinner with ENA Associates & Analysts
Please plan to attend a reception and dinner for those Analysts and
Associates due to rotate in the near future who have made significant
contributions to Enron North America. The function will be hosted by the
Office of the Chairman at Morton's Steak House located at 5000 Westheimer on
July 27, 2000. The reception will start at 7:00pm with dinner to follow at
7:45pm. Please RSVP to Ted Bland at ext. 3-5275 no later than close of
business Monday, July 24. This will be an informal gathering to discuss the
progress of ENA and an open forum to interact with the management team on a
one on one basis. See you on Thursday.
Mark, Dave and John | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I still don't understand. But we are net short crude, and Crude, company
wide got longer 1000 contracts yesterday. This is counter to what you are
saying below... Jeff
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6
You are correct, JBLOCK got longer 495K barrels. However, crude is a huge
hedge component on this deal and net crude position for Liquids is short.
As you can see on the Component VaR graph, with the short position in crude,
it is eating up most of Agg-Liquids VaR. Therefore, putting on any long
position in products (this includes LPG's) would act as a hedge.
Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
11/07/2000 12:41 PM
To: Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6
how did it reduce var if we added to the underlying positions?
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6
JBlock does take up some of the VaR for Agg-Liquids; however, it is not a
contributor of VaR violation for effective date Nov. 6. As matter of fact,
the VaR for JBlock went down. The component VaR graph below shows that
heating oil was a hedge but no longer as of yesterday. Gasoil is still a
hedge for Agg-Liquids but the hedge is reduced.
Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
11/07/2000 12:07 PM
To: Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6
Where is the mention of J Block hedges.
From: Christian LeBroc @ ENRON 11/07/2000 12:04 PM
To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6
Liquids desk has a VaR violation for effective date Nov. 6 of $8.2MM, over
its limit by 3 percent.
The violation was due to heating and gasoil going shorter by 939K barrels.
Essential, shorten the heat/gasoil position reduced the overall net long
products, portfolio causing the crack spreads to widen when crude oil is net
short 5MM barrels.
Furthermore, volatility on crude was up 3 percent with 15 cents upward move
in price.
Christian | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I've added two new swaps to reflect the change from the California PX to the
Dow Jones index after 1/31/01. The following deal numbers cover the whole
term of the deal.
404980 - 9/1/00 through 1/31/01 @ PX NP15 Index
512726 - 2/1/01 through 8/31/03 @ DJ NP15 Peak Index
512743 - 2/1/01 through 8/31/01 @ DJ NP15 Off-Peak Index
Both new deals have comments that link them back to the original deal. Let me
know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Kate | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The big switch here is that we're shutting Public Service Electric and Gas
Commpany for power. All their power will be traded out of PSEG Energy
Resources & Trade LLC. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is the capital cost of peakers I sent Thomas
Ben | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
<<December 17, 2001 Notification.doc>>
Thank you,
Bobbi J. Kilburn
Treasury & Risk Administrator
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
(802) 258-4120
(802) 258-2101
[email protected]
- December 17, 2001 Notification.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2000
04:04 PM ---------------------------
"WINNIE HOWARD" <[email protected]> on 01/26/2000 10:42:58 AM
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli
Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: January 28, 2000 Meeting
Attached are three documents formatted in Word 6.0 that will be handled out
at the meeting in San Diego.
- 1003-444-157 - word 6.0.doc
- 1001-107-147 - word 6.0.doc
- 1001-106-147 - word 6.0.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Kristin:
Sorry for the delay. Unfotunately I don't have any openings in my group right now. If I hear of any positions open I'll give you a shout. Can you remind me what title you have now.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Gandy, Kristin
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:00 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
John,
Hello and good Monday morning to you. I briefly meet you while talking to Paul Racicot on Friday at Front Porch Pub. With Matt working here in Freight you probably already know we are not well off these days. Next on the chopping block is never a good place to be.
This is a forward question but what the hell. I was wondering if you knew of any positions available in your area. If you can believe it I am not ready to leave Enron behind yet. Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Kristin Gandy
Freight Markets
Enron Global Markets
1400 Smith Street ECS 3657
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-7263
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>
RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax
- CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please accept my apologies for this worksheet's absence yesterday. It was
undergoing cosmetic improvements to more accurately represent the EES-EPMI
position. Note two new column headings as of 3/27 - "Transmission" and "Other
EnPower" deals. Also, a change has been made to the SP-15 volumes in the 3/2
sheet. This change was made per Daniel Kang at EES and Chris Foster at EPMI.
And as always, feel free to contact me with questions.
Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The below is a list of Friday, May 4 deals in which the Confirmation was not
sent by COB on May 7 (T/D+1)
2 deals revised after sent (ECT Intl) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
For the week August 28-September 1:
Transwestern's weekly average deliveries to California were 1,062 MMcf/d
while east deliveries averaged 429 MMcf/d. San Juan lateral averaged 828
MMcf/d while receipts from Rio Puerco averaged 75 MMcf/d. Mojave deliveries
averaged a range of 55-110 MMcf/d throughout the week. By Friday, Window
Rock receipts were 0 MMcf/d.
By Friday, El Paso deliveries to California increased to a 68% throughput
level of 1,950 MMcf/d. :
- PG&ETop (capacity 1,140 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 367 MMcf/d
- SoCalEhr (capacity 1,230 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 1,045 MMcf/d
- SoCalTop (capacity 5400 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 538 MMcf/d
Other pipeline throughput:
- PGT ( capacity 1,937 MMcf/d) throughput to California averaged 1,881 MMc/d
- Kern River (capacity 700) throughput to California averaged 367 MMcf/d.
Friday Enron Online Basis numbers:
Permian to California basis for Oct has decreased from Monday by 1.30 while
Nov00-March'01 and April-Oct have decrease by .43 and .37 respectively.
Oct. Nov 00-March '01 April-Oct '01
Perm-CA 1.08 .60 .67
SJ - CA 1.84 .85 1.62
SJ-Waha .82 .30 .40
Perm-Waha .07 .055 .07 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Terri -- As discussed, attached please find the two confirmation agreements
with my comments. Please modify to reflect your own review and come back to
me with any questions or comments. --David
Terri Clynes
12/06/2000 07:04 PM
To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2 Draft Contracts
David,
Please review these agreements and let me know your comments. I am in Las
Vegas this week but am available to discuss.
Thanks,
Terri
---------------------- Forwarded by Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 06:56
PM ---------------------------
"Pam Sarvela (MPEX)" <[email protected]> on 12/06/2000 11:41:47 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: 2 Draft Contracts
<<ScheduleK2001..doc>> <<EnronLD_K2001.doc>>
Terri;
Attached are two draft contracts.
The first contract is for the Schedule K - Participation Power Purchase,
with a fixed price block of energy for $64 MWh, and capacity at $4,666.67
MW-Month (or $28-Kw season). The repricing provisions are based off of a
loss of system resources of greater than 150 MW, with the units identified.
The second contract is for the Financially Firm Energy. I structured this a
little differently than what I originally anticipated, based on a discussion
with Tim and how the ASC views "financially firm" accredited products.
Since EPRI wants to be able to accredit this transaction, the best way to
deal with the financial firm energy seemed to be by pulling it out and
putting it into an exhibit. I'm open to discussion on this if EPMI has a
alternative way that they would like to see. Also, please note that per our
discussion on Friday, December 1, I added a contingency into this document
that Split Rock and EPMI must enter into a Master Agreement by December 15
or the agreement will be void.
- ScheduleK2001..doc
- EnronLD_K2001.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Scott--We elect not to accept assignment of our allotted MARS capacity on AGL.
Call if you have quesitons.
Doug Kinney
Ph: 703-561-6339
Fax: 703-561-7317 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Just wanted to congradulate you and wish you much success in your new
endeavors.
Warmest regards,
Sandra | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Drew, what is BNSF? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
So what are the actions coming out of this? Just pushing IT (who don't seem
to have the AS400 resources) won't fix the problem. Also, what is the plan
re SAP?
Mike Jordan@ECT
02/26/2001 01:11 PM
To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Ted
Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Metals - Imminent Actions - an update
Rick / Rick / Sally
I attach the 'executive' summary of a note sent to the office of the chair
last week detailing current operational difficulties with the Metals
Merchanting business. Subsequently an 'all hands' meeting was called to
discuss the operational issues and the business imperatives of
Off Balance Sheet Facility ("OBSF") renegotiation
Minimising working captial
SAP implementation
The notes of that meeting are also attached at the bottom of this email
Should you require any further information please call, otherwise I will
forward updates as they are completed.
Regards
Mike
ISSUE
The Physical metals business implemented an Off Balance Sheet Structure
(OBSF) pre year-end to meet Enron requirements for gearing ratios.
Whilst this does not present undue problems for LME warrants, these being
bearer documents, it does present an issue when physical metal, the value of
which depends upon brand and location, is placed into the facility. Given the
hard deadline of year-end the operational support of this process initially
took place on spreadsheets.
The impact of the OBSF on the operational side of the physical business
should not be underestimated. The process of moving material off and on
balance sheet places considerable strain from trading through to settlements,
particularly when there is an absence of necessary control functionality in
the AS400. With the specified functionality it is believed that all
operational and trading issues arising from OBSF can be managed
satisfactorily.
The core functionality, which was due prior to the year-end, was released
during January but was subsequently found to have introduced +bugs, to the
integrated business control processes. Whilst an improvement on having no
OBSF functionality, the +bugs, have had an increasingly negative effect on
the control environment, compounded by the fact that IT can not provide a
guaranteed delivery for the +bug, fixes and non core ,reporting,
functionality.
This has given rise to the following concerns:
? There are insufficient experienced resources to fully reconcile stock at a
brand & location level to coordination records (the global position is
reconciled however).
? It is not possible to substantiate the DPR for EM&CL as:
? a) P&L on spread moves from Cash to 3 months positions (and related cash to
3 months provisions) can not be produced by the system and must be estimated,
and
? b) System bugs have created uncertainties over trial balance values.
These concerns are compounded by the following:
? The most experienced AS400 IT developer for the EM&CL business has
resigned. He is currently working his 6 months notice which will expire in
July 2001.
? The most experienced AS400 IT developer on the EML side of the business has
also resigned. He left in January 2001.
? There is no documentation for the AS400. It is therefore difficult for
experienced AS400 programmers to get upto speed on the system.
Conclusion
It is essential that we do not become hostages to the development of the
AS400 system and the renegotiation of the OBSF facility with Barclays. The
current situation has arisen due to non-delivery of IT developments and tight
timescales on the finalisation of the OBSF facility.
To meet Q1 end requirements (i.e. full production of the DPR and stock
reconciliation), IT and the OBSF deal team must make concrete commitments on
delivery timeline. The business will not be able to commit to successful
implementation of the facility and resubstantiation of the Trial Balance
without these
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 26/02/2001 16:18
---------------------------
Mike Jordan
26/02/2001 16:18
To: Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe
Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Farmer/EU/Enron@ENRON, Michael J
Hutchinson/EU/Enron@Enron, Anne Edgley/LON/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Allen/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT,
Robert Campbell/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Howard
Carter/EU/Enron@Enron, Bill Appleby/LON/ECT@ECT, David P Tregar/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Metals - Imminent Actions - notes of meeting 23 rd Feb
To all
I seek to clarify the actions discussed at Friday's meeting and to emphasise
the critical importance of getting all the below completed as quickly as
possible to meet our Q1 requirements ( revenue targets, balance sheet
targets, interest expense minimisation etc ). The proposed tactical plan that
was circulated is not attached as it has already been superceded!
There was agreement on several broad areas of immediate focus with specific
objectives and accountabilities -
IT resourcing
Communicate priority to HR about the importance of obtaining skilled AS400
programmers - for tactical short term and for long term work - action MP
Resourcing for long term AS400 'off-load' initiative to be completed asap -
action MP
Merchanting resource focus to be on bug fixes impacting MO ability to update
OBSF options in AS400 and for traffic to update recent location movements of
stock in OBSF - action RC ( deadline 1 week )
Completion of inception document for full OBSF inventory control
functionality - action RC ( deadline 1 week )
Split of resources for SAP interface - only EML SAP implementation is now
planned for 1/4/01 - action RC to confirm resource reallocation 27/01
Immediate improvement in IT Operations support required ( including
completion of transfer of support responsibility from Dev. to Ops. ) - action
MP
Operational Support
MO risk/trade accounting resources to focus on rebooking all remaining
transactions on OBSF inventory spreadsheet - action HC ( deadline asap )
Validation of system generated p&l to commence following the above - action
HC ( deadline asap )
Timetable for catch up of traffic OBSF location movements to be completed
with John Lunzer 27/02 - action HC
Determine action for improvement in delivering metal to facility ( initial
assumption for recent working capital increase was that we had operationally
slowed down in placing qualifying material into facility ) - action HC / AC
(deadline asap)
Working Capital
Detailed daily analysis of working capital movements to be produced and
formatted in style of sources and uses of funds ( including facility
headroom ) - action AC ( deadline asap )
Forward estimate of working capital to be produced for rest of quarter and
used for estimation of full interest expense - action AC, MJ & MA ( deadline
asap )
Analysis for trade receivables ( and reasons for recent increase ) and
investigation of possible factoring - AC/MJ and AE/BA ( deadline asap )
Determining extent to which pricing signals for working capital usage can be
communicated to traders, traffic and operations - action JG, MJ ( contingent
on above )
OBSF negotiation
Documentation of current negotiation issues ( including AA sign-off issues )
to be drafted and circulated with clear accountabilities - action MA/DT/BA
(deadline 26/3)
Operational impact of agreement to be considered in parallel to negotiation -
action HC/AC/BA
LME relationship
Consider utilising a US subsidiary to book OBSF transactions to negate LME
reviewing facility as part of regulatory regime - action MA/FD
Monitoring notice of investigation issued by LME -action FD/DT | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI.... exhibit C for the P.O.
Stephen
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000
08:38 AM ---------------------------
"Leo, Tony" <[email protected]> on 11/10/2000 06:11:11 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Bentley,
Chris" <[email protected]>, "Nock, Herb" <[email protected]>, "Leitman, Jerry"
<[email protected]>, "Levine, Ross" <[email protected]>, "'Jacqueline Scheib'"
<[email protected]>
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Exhibit C
Exhibit C of the contract, Fixed Specifications is attached, along with the
figure attachment. Let me know if anyone wants to retitle the figure or
rework any of the language.
Tony
<<Exhibit C.doc>> <<Attachment to Exhibit C.tif>>
- Exhibit C.doc
- Attachment to Exhibit C.tif | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
From Southern Energy.
----- Forwarded by Ron Coker/Corp/Enron on 10/09/2000 09:47 AM -----
"Green, Barbara E." <[email protected]>
10/09/2000 09:40 AM
To: "'Coker, Ron'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Goodrich, Teri L." <[email protected]>, "Heinz, Kim A."
<[email protected]>
Subject: Site Visit - West Assets
As instructed in the Data Room and Site Visit Procedures, Southern Energy,
Inc. would like to request the following dates for site visits:
LV Cogen - Thurs., Oct. 12th
Pastoria Energy Facility - Fri., Oct. 13th
We will have approximately 10 team members on our due diligence team and
will provide Enron with a list of names, titles and employer (for any
outside consultants, etc.) once we have been confirmed.
If you have any questions, please call me at 770-821-7623. Thanks! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We are not ready to execute an agreement with them until we have had some
discussions with them about their authority. Please send them the ISDA then
have them call Mary Cook to discuss the agreement.
Dave Fuller
02/08/2001 06:03 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ISDA for Clark County PUD #1
Hi Tana,
The ISDA that I faxed you is not executable, can you send me one that is?
Dave
From: Tana Jones on 01/26/2001 02:23 PM CST
To: Dave Fuller/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jason R Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ISDA for Clark County PUD #1
Dave,
Attached is the Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement. The document you
faxed me was the preprinted form of ISDA Master Agreement. That document,
TOGETHER with the attached Schedule is your full "ISDA Master Agreement".
Also attached to this Schedule is the form of Enron Corp. Guaranty and
proposed form of Legal Opinion to be issued by Clark County PUD #1.
It is my understanding that you will provide these documents directly to the
counterparty. Again, the whole package above must be provided to the
counterparty or you will not have a complete set of documents. Call me if
you have any questions. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I appreciate your recommendation of Van for a summer internship with Enron.
I have communicated with Van and let her know that she will have a place on
our interview schedule at Rice.
I will keep you updated regarding the status of Van's application.
Thank you,
Christy Young
Recruiter
Enron
Vince J Kaminski
01/17/2000 07:39 AM
To: Christy Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Miertschin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: resume
Christy and Beth,
Van worked with us during the summer and over the winter break.
She did an outstanding job.
I would like to recommend her for another summer internship and
also keep her in mind for the future employment.
Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000
07:38 AM ---------------------------
"Van T. Ngo" <[email protected]> on 01/16/2000 06:00:57 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: resume
Dear Vince,
Please find attached a copy of my resume. I have
talked with Christy Young and Beth Miertschin, the
college recruiters for the A&A Program regarding
my interest in an internship at Enron this
summer. I understand that within the Analyst
Program, there are 4 rotational options; of those,
I would be most interested in one of the "Finance
rotations." I would be happy to explore one of
the number of groups within this area. (Please
let me know if this is sufficient or if you will
need me to give more specific indication of which
department I would like to be considered for an
internship.)
I greatly appreciate your consideration regarding
my job opportunities with Enron. Please let me
know if there is anything else I can do to
facilitate this process. I look forward to our
meeting again.
Sincerely,
Van Ngo
P.S. Shirley, I have mailed to you my parking
permit. Please contact me if you had any problems
with it.
- MyResume.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The Limo Driver will pick you up @ 1:30 p.m. He can be reached @ 281-922-4449. Be sure and get the driver's cell number and give him your cell number. So you guys can find each other after the concert. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I saw Kim's response to Stephen Douglas, but it left me short of comfort on a
completion timeline or enough details around assurance on an on-going basis
that this will be kept up. I sent the note below to Kim. I am sure that she
manages well, but I think that we should encourage her to step into full
responsibility and to be able to effectively communicate that within the
organization. It is likely that when Stephen reads her note, that he will
call me and tell me that he still doesn't know when this task will be
completed. That was his concern yesterday, and Kim's note really doesn't
address that. If she doesn't have an estimated completion date, then she
should set a target date for having all of the info compiled and state that
at that date she will be able to create a realistic timeline for completing
the task.
Kim must own and communicate effectively the solutions, or I will be the one
that gets the phone calls. The ENA organization must develop confidence in
others on our team. Let's help Kim earn that confidence by coaching her to
imagine the info that the customers needs (Stephen) and to clearly
communicate information that addresses his needs. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/28/2000 10:02 AM
---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Sally Beck 12/28/2000 10:01 AM
To: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ENA RMT Confirmations
Kim, do you have an estimated completion date for the commodities where the
notation is that information is being compiled? My guess would be that the
one commodity that is up-to-date (financial power) is the one with the lowest
number of transactions. That means that the lion's share of the work is
still to be done. Are we staffed to get this completed in a timely manner?
As I mentioned to you before, I would not hesitate enlisting Jeff Sorenson to
do much of catch up work if we are short on people to get this done
promptly. Let me know if you need his help, and I will visit with Brent
Price. I know that Brent would support Jeff's involvement to get this caught
up.
Who specifically will be responsible on an on-going basis to handle the RMT
Confirmations? Will we have some sort of report that we can send to Stephen
each month that will indicate the completion of this task so that he is
comfortable on an on-going basis that this is being kept up-to-date? --Sally
Kim S Theriot 12/27/2000 05:51 PM
To: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENA RMT Confirmations
Stephen,
As a follow-up to my earlier voicemail message, the status of the RMT
Confirmation Project is as follows:
Financial Gas: RMT Confirmations complete through December 1999
Bob Bowen is working on compiling the data for 2000
Financial Power: RMT Confirmations complete through November 2000
Financial Weather
and Liquids: Bob Bowen is working on compiling the data for 1999 and 2000
Financial FX: Laurel Adams is assessing the work to
compile the data for 1999 and 2000
From this point forward, the RMT Confirmation will be prepared on a monthly
basis for each commodity.
As far as the Year End RMT Project, I spoke with Bob Bowen this morning as to
the status. What he told me was that he was supposed to receive a file
containing the deal information of the deals involved. This was per the
meeting that he attended last week. As of this morning he had not received
anything He stated that he was expecting the file last week but never
received any information. He was going to follow-up with the appropriate
individual. I will give you an update in the morning to make sure that he
has the data needed to complete the project.
If you have any further questions, please call me at ext. 31771.
Kim Theriot | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I accept the terms & conditions of this Pilot Participation Agreement.
Kay Mann | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear Jeff,
Happy (somewhat belated) new year. I hope you are doing well in sunny
downtown Houston. I am writing from Princeton where minutes ago I
happily finished my Economics exam, the last of the semester. In
reviewing the agenda for the rest of the academic year, I thought it
might be a good time to finalize summer plans as well.
I will be occupied with a job here at Princeton until June 3 - I am
working logistics for part of this year's reunions. After that date, I
would need only a day or two of turnaround time before coming out to
Houston. I could conceivably be in the office by Wednesday, June 6.
Depending upon your needs at the office and the possibility of a short
cultural study on a small island off of the coast of western Sumatra, I
could plan on being in Houston until at least early August. Please let
me know what your plans are on the other end.
Thanks in advance for your attention.
Sincerely, Dan
- dfuller.vcf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
These are the materials that Ken Lay used in his discussions with California
business leaders. The word document was provided as background. Please keep
confidential and if I've missed anyone please forward along. Comments are
welcome and appreciated.
Best,
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Now you can access the archives of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) meetings via the internet using Real Player. The Capitol Connection
is offering this service for free for a limited time. If you have not
already registered and received the login name and password for the
archives, please go to http://www.capitolconnection.org and click on the
FERC link on the sidebar. Then click and complete the Archive Registration
and you will receive your login name and password.
If you are interested in the Live or Archived meetings of the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) or National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB), please contact us.
If you have any questions concerning the FERC Video Archives, please
contact us at [email protected] or at 703-993-3100.
Thank you,
The Capitol Connection
George Mason University Television
http://www.capitolconnection.org
[email protected]
PH: 703-993-3100 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
CHEVRON TEXACO RAISES SYNERGY TARGET, ESTABLISHES PRODUCTION GROWTH GOAL
Chevron Texaco Corp. (NYSE: CVX) did not let another major oil company
merger overshadow its first
presentation to Wall Street oil analysts since completing its own
combination.
In fact, the chairman of the San
Francisco multinational cheerfully ...
Published by: Petroleum Finance Week
Date: 11/26/2001
Word Count: 901
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 100
Folder Name: Enron Corp.
Full-text article available at
http://nrstg1p.djnr.com/cgi-bin/NewsRetrieval?cgi=WEB_ST_WC_STORY&DBNAME=ENERGY&HDAN=PTRY0133000001&Search=Enron%20Corp.%3A0000001529&QID=1529&QT=S&HDSC=PTRY
Articles are included at no charge for flat-fee corporate customers. (Under standard pricing, charges apply. For details, click the $ icon on the Dow Jones Interactive home page, located at http://www.djinteractive.com.)
______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
OK.. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI. You got it!
---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 12/12/2000
01:33 PM ---------------------------
John Gillespie
12/12/2000 09:03 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Invitation - John Gillespie re IBUYIT (here) (13 Dec 08:30 AM
CST)
Rod,
After receiving feedback from both yourself and Phil Lowry through George
Wasaff, we will cancel this meeting. Originally Peter Buettgen and I were
anticipating the need to share the details of our process assessment strategy
with you prior to our kickoff. However, it has been pointed out that Morris
has been identified as the lead player and has responsibility for all
decision making. Therefore we will be working directly with Morris and will
not burden you with details unless Morris feels appropriate.
Thank you for your support and commitment in the completion of the iBuyit
process assessment.
John
New meeting request from Rod Hayslett
12/13/2000 08:30 AM Local Time
12/13/2000 09:00 AM Local Time
Title: John Gillespie re IBUYIT (here)
Location: -No room information available-
Chair: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron
To (required): Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John Gillespie/Corp/Enron
cc (optional): Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron
John: Morris can't make this time and he needs to be in it. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Louise --
Never heard from Shawn. Any issues with me contacting on Monday?
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:16 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: Presentation
Shawn
We have had a lot of discussion on the contractual arrangements we would need to put in place in order to recommence trading as quickly as possible. I am working on producing a fuller list for you today. However, there is one particular contract/licence which does require special treatment - Power Marketing Licence to be granted by FERC. In order to ensure that we start this process as quickly as possible we are looking to complete the filing documentation in advance of the bankruptcy decision on our future.
Our current strategy is as follows (all dates are approximate)
Present - January 10th, 2002 Complete filing documentation
January 11th Visit with FERC (One of senior executives here plus a senior executive from our buyer)
January 13th File and request an expedited process
It would be extremelly helpful if you could identify someone for the Head of our Regulatory Group (Jim Steffes) to co-ordinate with at Citi.
Thanks
Louise | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi again,
I accidentally deleted the emails you sent me about Gleason. Could you
resend them?
Thanks,
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 1/26/02; HourAhead hour: 5; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012605.txt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.