text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Hi Kam,
I am working with Toni Graham in reviewing resumes for your Risk Management
position, Req. # 108785. I have reviewed all of the postings to date. These
were the ones that were worth sending to you. Please review and let me know
which ones you would like me to phone screen. I will actively be looking for
more resumes tomorrow as well.
Thanks!
Imelda Trevino
Human Resources
ext.5-2539
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Time for a battle field promotion. I'll be Tanto, you can be him that sabes.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 01:46 PM -----
Scott Govenar <[email protected]>
02/28/2001 11:08 AM
To: Hedy Govenar <[email protected]>, Mike Day <[email protected]>, Bev
Hansen <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>, Susan J Mara
<[email protected]>, Joseph Alamo <[email protected]>, Paul Kaufman
<[email protected]>, Michael McDonald <[email protected]>,
David Parquet <[email protected]>, Rick Johnson
<[email protected]>, Marcie Milner <[email protected]>, Sandra McCubbin
<[email protected]>, Tim Belden <[email protected]>, Rick Shapiro
<[email protected]>, Jim Steffes <[email protected]>, Alan Comnes
<[email protected]>, Chris Calger <[email protected]>, Mary Hain
<[email protected]>, Joe Hartsoe <[email protected]>, Donna Fulton
<[email protected]>, Steven Kean <[email protected]>, Karen Denne
<[email protected]>, Beverly Aden <[email protected]>, Bill Votaw
<[email protected]>, Carol Moffett <[email protected]>, Debora
Whitehead <[email protected]>, Dennis Benevides
<[email protected]>, Don Black <[email protected]>, Dorothy
Youngblood <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Mike D Smith <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Leslie Lawner <[email protected]>, John
Neslage <[email protected]>, Ken Smith <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: ABX1 60
ABX1 60 (Hertzberg) was just scheduled for hearing this afternoon in the
Assembly Energy, Costs and Availability Committee. In brief, the bill
does the following:
Require, as a condition of certification by the CEC, that an applicant
offer to sell to an electrical
corporation, a municipal corporation, or the Department of Water
Resources, at a just and reasonable cost base price electrical power
generated by the facility.
This bill would also prohibit a person or entity, as defined, from
operating an electrical generation facility unless the person or entity
has submitted to the commission, within the time prescribed by
regulations adopted by the commission, a maintenance and outage
schedule, and the commission has approved that schedule.
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051-0100/abx1_60_bill_20010216_introdu
ced.pdf
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Clement, Enron Corp. currently has an executed guaranty for up to $12 mil
which guaranties Bridgeline Gas Marketing LLC deals with Superior Natural Gas
Corporation. ENA owns 40% of Bridgeline. The guaranty severally obligates
Enron Corp. for 40% of the $12 mil and Texaco Inc. for the other 60%. The
attached amendment increases the guaranty amount to $25 mil per Superior's
request. Please review and if acceptable obtain execution by Enron Corp.
Please call me at x-33512 with any questions.
Brant, This form will probably work for the Texaco guaranty also. I don't
have a copy of the Texaco guaranty though and I need to review it to make
sure it is identical to the Enron form. Can you obtain a copy for me?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hey there!
Just wanted to see if you got to work okay! Guess who was up in our studios
this morning???? Yep, you guessed it Deblah Morgan. She is actually a
really young singer and she is more on the Hip Hop side of the music
business. Anyway, I actually would have never known who she was unless
someone had told me.
So, what are you thinking about tonight. Do you want to see if Eric and Jenn
and David and whoever else want to meet downtown at Salintes?
Also, were you being serious about China? I really would consider it, but I
need to get more details about dates, etc. I actually think that would be so
much fun. Now you're sitting there saying, "crap, why did I bring that
up...I was just kidding around!"
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
We have parking with PNM for off-peak on Monday. The energy schedule is as
follows. The energy is at 4C but you should be able to move it to PV with
PNM if you ask nicely. We will split the upside over $35 with ST SW via
annuity. Please make all transmission purchases or other sales under their
book.
Deal number on the buy from PNM is #581199.
The shape of this length is:
HE1 50
HE2 50
HE3 50
HE4 50
HE5 45
HE6 20
HE23 35
HE24 50
Day total is 350.
Thanks
Bill
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
As some of you may be aware, we have had a tremendous amount of problems with
Gas Lift sales customers. Gerald Lofton has been working with Ann Elizabeth
to resolve many of the issues that we inherited, from the simple collection
of outstandings funds due HPL to making sure contracts are in place. We are
the sole group within HPL that is now responsible for these types of
transactions. Anyone else making a request through legal should be directed
back to Gerald Lofton so that our efforts are coordinated.
It has come to my attention that HPL recently approved the assignment of the
LaMay contract, which did not come through this department for approval and
execution. We have been trying to collect old funds from this outfit for
several months, applying our offset language to recover funds due HPL. We
must be coordinated in our efforts in dealing with these types of customers,
making sure that all issues are in order before we grant assignment. I
absolutely need the cooperation of the legal department in making sure any
and all activities involving gas lift sales contracts are routed through
Gerald or myself, not through other sectors of the organization. Thank you
for your cooperation.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Thanks for your e-mail. We have converted to Outlook on our system would you send me the latest redline we have been discussing as I cannot retrieve it. Also you your changes to 8.2 did not show up if you could let me know your changes here I would appreciate it, and then I thing we are done.
Regards,
Debra
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 5:33 PM
To: Perlingiere, Debra
Subject: RE: EMBOLI
MASTER FIRM PURCHASE/SALE AGREEMENT
Debra,
Were you going to send executable copies, as duly revised?
Sarai Renken
Contract Admin.
MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.
----- Forwarded by Sarai Renken/Denver/MarkWest on 07/13/2001 04:27 PM
-----
Sarai Renken
To: [email protected]
06/25/2001 cc:
02:48 PM Subject: RE: EMBOLI
MASTER FIRM
PURCHASE/SALE AGREEMENT(Document link: Sarai
Renken)
I like the language with one modification, in red and bold below.
Sarai
Debra.Perlingiere
@enron.com To:
IMCEANOTES-SRenken+40markwest+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRO
06/25/2001 01:50 N.com
PM cc:
Subject: RE: EMBOLI
MASTER FIRM
PURCHASE/SALE AGREEMENT
Thanks for your e-mail. Here is language I purpose of Article 8.2
8.2. Transfer. This Agreement, including, without limitation, each
indemnification, shall inure to and bind the permitted successors and
assigns of the Parties; provided, neither Party shall transfer this
Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Party which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed; Notwithstanding the
foregoing, either Party may, without the consent of the other Party (and
without relieving itself from liability hereunder)but upon written notice,
(i) transfer, sell,
pledge, encumber or assign this Agreement or the accounts, revenues or
proceeds hereof in connection with any financing or other financial
arrangements, (ii) transfer or assign this Agreement to any Affiliate by
assignment, merger or otherwise, or (iii) transfer or assign this Agreement
to any person or entity succeeding to all or substantially all of the
assets of such Party; provided that any such succeeding entity or Affiliate
meets or exceeds the creditworthiness of the assigning Party and further
provided that such succeeding entity or Affiliate agrees in writing to be
bound by the terms and conditions hereof. Any Party's transfer in
violation of this Section 8.2 shall be void.
Let me have your thoughts regarding the attached.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Perlingiere, Debra
Subject: RE: EMBOLI
MASTER FIRM PURCHASE/SALE AGREEMENT
Let's try this with my document actually attached.
(See attached file: Enron Master Firm Agreement.doc)
----- Forwarded by Sarai Renken/Denver/MarkWest on 06/25/2001 10:10 AM
-----
Sarai Renken
To:
[email protected]
06/25/2001 cc:
10:12 AM Subject: RE: EMBOLI
MASTER FIRM PURCHASE/SALE
AGREEMENT(Document link: Sarai
Renken)
Debra,
A few corrections made -- corrected spelling of MarkWest, added company
info for exhibits A & C.
Still missing the language you wanted to add instead of mine in sect.
8.2,
subsections (ii) & (iii). Please see my notes in the document. Once we
get the wording agreed upon for these two subsections, we should have an
agreement.
We'll also need to discuss the GISB, but let's first get the master firm
agreement in place. Any questions, please feel free to e-mail me at
[email protected] or call me at 303-925-9275.
Sarai
Debra.Perlingiere
@enron.com To:
[email protected]
06/21/2001 11:06 m
AM cc:
Subject: RE: EMBOLI
MASTER FIRM PURCHASE/SALE
AGREEMENT
Sara,
Attached I hope, is the correct redline version which exemplifies the
agreed to changes. Please review and let me know if there are any
additional corrections.
(See attached file: Markwest Redline.doc)
Debra
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ENFOLIO
MASTER FIRM PURCHASE/SALE AGREEMENT
(See attached file: Enron Master Firm Agreement.doc)
- Enron Master Firm Agreement.doc << File: Enron Master Firm
Agreement.doc >>(See attached file: Markwest Redline.doc)
- Enron Master Firm Agreement.doc << File: Enron Master Firm
Agreement.doc >>
- Markwest Redline.doc << File: Markwest Redline.doc >>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Is this his attempt at humor because he is on the email list. I told them
you are on vacation, but they still want to have the call.
Kay Mann@ENRON
06/06/2001 07:36 AM
To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call
Sometimes John forgets that he is not a lawyer.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 07:36
AM ---------------------------
Kay Mann
06/06/2001 07:31 AM
To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call
Next time you vote for me, please copy me on the email.
Kay
From: Scott Dieball@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/05/2001 05:44 PM
To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call
Vacation??? I've heard that tomorrow at the staff meeting Mark H. will be
rolling out the new policy of eliminating all vacation for ENA legal folks.
John G Rigby
06/05/2001 03:08 PM
To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call
Lets continue without Kay. I think this call will be focusing on the
documents sent out already.
Suzanne Adams@ECT
06/05/2001 02:42 PM
To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call
Kay will be on vacation Thursday and Friday. Can the call go on without
her? Same time, 1:30 p.m. CDT? Let me know please.
John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/05/2001 02:25 PM
To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call
lets make the change- GE cannot make it wednesday- plus the extra day gives
both GE and us time to review the exhibits and the new T&C draft. given that
Sheila is in her "hostage situation", the other key person is Kay. Thanks.
Suzanne Adams@ECT
06/05/2001 12:02 PM
To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call
John, I'm not going to change the call to Thursday until I hear from you to
make sure you guys want it that way. Thanks, Suzanne
John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/05/2001 11:17 AM
To: [email protected]@ENRON
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call
Changing to Thursday works better for Scott Dieball, John Rigby and Peter
Thompson.
[email protected]
06/05/2001 08:49 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call
Any chance of postponing until Thursday afternoon - same time?
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:09 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; Swift, Stephen L
(PS, CommOps); Barnas, Michael C (PS, Legal); Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE);
[email protected]; Schroeder, John H Jr (PS, Sales);
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: Weekly GE Conference Call
Importance: High
The weekly conference call will take place at 1:30 p.m. CDT on Wednesday,
June 6, 2001. EB38C1 has been reserved for those of you in Houston.
Dial In: 1-888-285-4585
Participant: 536220
Host: 121970 (Sheila)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 10/30/00 02:29 PM -----
Robert Eickenroht@ENRON
Sent by: Andrew Wu@ENRON
10/25/00 06:47 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Edwin
Essandoh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David L
Roland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gerry
Willis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard DiMichele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carmen
Pokluda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Freed/HOU/EES@EES,
Laurel S Gleason/EFS/EES@EES, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Schuh/FRA/ECT@ECT, Jack Harmuth/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ray
Alvarez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Raul Baldivia/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Fernando
Gonzalez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Juan Pablo Sanchez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES,
Cynthia Trigo/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES
cc: Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Enron Noncompetition Agreement; Important Notice
At the request of Jim Derrick, attached is a Memorandum from Mr. Derrick to
all Enron Attorneys outlining the obligations of Enron Corp., Enron Energy
Services, LLC and their respective controlled affiliates under a
Noncompetition Agreement that was recently executed. Also attached is an
Executive Summary of the Agreement and an electronic version of the Agreement
as executed. Please also circulate this Memorandum to any attorneys in your
respective business units if they are not on this distribution.
Please note that the Noncompetition Agreement and the transactions underlying
same are highly confidential and have not been publicly announced.
Therefore, please treat same with strict confidence.
The attachments are also being distributed to the Enron Corporate Development
Group and members of the Enron Executive Committee.
Robert
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron on 03/07/2002
11:36 AM ---------------------------
Joe Chapman
03/07/2002 10:57 AM
To: Patricia Hunter/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Availability Calculation.ENG.DOC
The attached PDF file contains the latest 1.5 Faults and the Timers which are
initiated.
If there is a "- - - -" in the 1.5 column, the Fault is not used.
Ron
---------------------- Forwarded by Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron on 03/07/2002
09:36 AM ---------------------------
Klaus Holtel@TWTDE
03/07/2002 09:29 AM
To: Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Availability Calculation.ENG.DOC
It is all described in the attached document:
---------------------- Weitergeleitet von Klaus Holtel/DEVELOP/TWT/DE am
07.03.2002 18:25 ---------------------------
Ronald Brzezinski@ENRON am 07.03.2002 18:18:31
An: REC-SCADA
Kopie: Kim Nguyen/EWC/Enron@Enron
Thema: Re: Availability Calculation.ENG.DOC
Klaus,
I need to know which Timer is started for each of the following Fault/Status
messages, for example, Downtime, Weather Out, Line out, External Stop, etc.
This information is not in the older version of the VisuPro manual.
Thank you.
Ron
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
09:04 AM ---------------------------
Fabienne <[email protected]> on 02/06/2001 08:44:19 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject:
- Marketincompleteness_typese.pdf
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Done
-----Original Message-----
From: Frevert, Mark
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:08 AM
To: Horton, Stanley
Subject: FW: URGENT NEED FOR A CONTACT
Stan, could you please have someone respond to this . Thanks . Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: A.S. Nyirenda [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 08 November 2001 06:50
To: Frevert, Mark; [email protected]; Baxter, Cliff AEP HPL USER; Skilling, Jeff; Lay, Kenneth
Cc: Santana, Vedruna J
Subject: URGENT NEED FOR A CONTACT
Dear Sirs,
We are an electricity utulity in Zambia which is undertaking a World Bank funded Power Rehabilitation Project. We have been trying for some days to make Email,telephone and fax contact with someone in Enron dealing with such issues without success. This we have been trying in conjunction with your Embassy office here. As can be seen from the message below we require a feedback from the relevant person or any one of you TODAY! Please reply to us as a matter of urgency.
Regards
Aaron S Nyirenda
----- Original Message -----
From: A.S. Nyirenda <mailto:[email protected]>
To: Cuthbert E. Roberts <mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Kennedy Mbewe <mailto:[email protected]> ; POWER REHABILITATION PROJECT <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:31 PM
Subject: TD 98 TRANSFORMER CONTRACT FOR KAFUE GORGE POWER STATION
Dear Mr C.Robberts
Zambia Power Rehabilitation Project:
During the shortlisting for Contract CD 94-95 your company, Enron International, was one of those shortlisted for the contract. Later the component of transformers was removed and packaged separately as TD 98. We are about to send out Invitations to Tender for TD 98 to all the previously shortlisted companies.
As a matter of urgency, please confirm to us the contact Email address, Telephone, Fax, Postal and physical addresses. Reply to both Emails shown below.
Regards
Aaron S. Nyirenda : Project Manager- Generation
Zesco PRP, P O Box 33304, Lusaka, Zambia
Telephone +260 1 239343/ 237597 Fax +260 1 239343/ 237597/223970
Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear Dr. Lay--
Thank you for your presentation yesterday. As always, you handled very well some tough questions in a very trying time for Enron. I was literally mortified when I heard the "crack" question-- but I think you handled that well too. As a 17-year Enron veteran, the question made me truly ashamed to be associated with the co-worker who asked the question. Hindsight is always 20/20. I'm sure you must know that the majority of Enron's employees don't feel the same way as this one individual.
Thanks for your continued hard work and support.
Kevin Hyatt
Director, Asset Development
ETS
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Greetings from Citibank Bill Manager,
We recently emailed you regarding new service levels that would be available
for your selection on June 1, 2001 for Citibank Bill Manager. However, due
to additional improvements we are making to the Citibank Bill Manager site,
these new service levels will now be available beginning June 7, 2001.
We apologize for this delay.
When you visit Citibank Bill Manager for the first time on or after June 7,
2001, you will be asked to select one of the three available service levels.
***** If you do not select a service level by June 30, 2001, you will
automatically be placed in the Premium Plan. *****
Please keep in mind that the service level you select is effective for your
billing activity in the month of June and billing for your new service level
will begin with your July statement.
If you select the Premium or Standard Plan, your account will reflect the
features of the new service level the next time you visit Citibank Bill Manager.
You may change your service level at any time by going to the Profile section
within Citibank Bill Manager. Changing your service level to the Free Plan
within the Profile Section will be available later this month. If you choose
to change your service level within the Profile section, billing for the new
service level will be effective immediately.*
If you select the Free Plan, you must remove all non-AT&T Universal Card and
Citi Card billers and bills from your account before you can complete the
change in your service level. Your account will reflect the features of the
Free Plan later this month.
If you have any questions about the new service levels, please do not hesitate
to contact us at [email protected] or call 1-888-489-8653
between 8am and midnight ET, 7 days a week.
Sincerely,
Citibank Bill Manager Subscriber Services
* Customers who change their service level within the Profile section during
the month of June may see the new service level reflected on their June bill.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
David is doing well, too. He is working contract, having quit Burlington
Resources about a year ago so that his work schedule could be more flexible.
Yes, Tammy is still with us. We marked our 10 year anniversary with her in
March, except for that six month period when she was with her dad in
Kentucky. I truly am blessed. --Sally
From: Mary Griff Gray
08/10/2000 07:11 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: excitement
Sally --
How's David? Do you still have Tammy watching the kids? I'm amazed that
Tyler is already 2 1/2. I bet he is just precious -- boys just have so much
energy and are so soft-hearted. I'm sure you feel so blessed -- you are.
Wishing you a good day,
Griff
Enron North America Corp.
From: Sally Beck 08/09/2000 09:28 AM
To: Mary Griff Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: excitement
It was great to see a friendly face! Don't ever hesitate to wave or stop in
and say hello. Can you believe that I had been on the 30th floor since the
summer of 1994?! I know that sets some kind of record at Enron!! It is kind
of fun to be up here. The appreciation for the jobs that we do in operations
has grown over the last several years, thanks to the hard work of you and so
many others.
My family is doing great. The children start school tomorrow. Meagan will
be a junior in high school -- we took a brief trip with her this summer for
an early look at some colleges. It will be a big year for Amanda -- she
starts junior high in 6th grade. And Tyler would tell you proudly that he is
"two and a half". What a delight he continues to be!!
I know that Erin has worked hard. I hope that she and her husband are doing
well. --Sally
From: Mary Griff Gray
08/08/2000 08:51 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: excitement
Sally --
I acted impulsively when I saw you this a.m. I was so excited to know you
were on the 33rd floor where I was picking up United Way shirts that I didn't
control my enthusiasm over seeing you.
I apologize if I disrupted you.
Griff
P.S. I hope your family is doing fine. Erin graduates in December from
UT-Dallas with her masters in Speech Path. She and her husband are doing
very well and very much in love.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
just didn't know if we could get you guys to play all 18. 18's fine with us.
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
05/09/2001 11:14 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Can you be home
that sounds like a plan, but it is just as expensive to play 9 as it is 18.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:07 AM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: Can you be home
you and eldon want to golf 9 holes sunday morning?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Bob,
I responded to another message with the correct address.
My last name is Kaminski, not Kaminsky (Slavic names end in ski). This is
the source of the confusion.
Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000
08:13 AM ---------------------------
Robert Brooks <[email protected]> on 03/24/2000 12:05:03 PM
Please respond to "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: Returned mail: User unknown
Hi Vince,
As you can see, the new e-mail address I've been told should work for you
doesn't.
Bob Brooks
-----Original Message-----
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 9:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
The original message was received at Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:48:41 -0800 (PST)
from adsl-63-198-129-100.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.198.129.100]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[email protected]>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mailman.enron.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<[email protected]>
<<< 550 <[email protected]>... User unknown
550 <[email protected]>... User unknown
- ATT00004.att
From: Robert Brooks <[email protected]>
To: 'GPCM Distribution' <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Enerfax Daily (http://www.enerfax.com/)
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:55:00 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----
=_NextPart_001_01BF9578.6D093F80"
NGPL Storage Capacity Full this Year
Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America has entered into natural gas
storage contracts for 25 Bcf of firm nominated storage service. The majority
of the capacity was awarded under two separate three-year contracts. NGPL's
nominated storage service, with a capacity of 130 Bcf, is now fully
subscribed until at least 2001.
Bob Brooks
(See complete Enerfax by clicking the icon ATT00001.htm).
-----Original Message-----
From: Enerfax Daily [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 1:01 AM
To: **aaaenerfax
Subject: Enerfax Daily (http://www.enerfax.com/)
- ATT00001.htm
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
pat what are you talking about?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Crenshaw, Shirley
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:46 AM
To: Taylor, Liz M.
Subject: FW: directions to Prediction
Liz - these are great directions and it takes approximately 34 minutes.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Shirley
-----Original Message-----
From: mail [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:50 AM
To: Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject: directions to Prediction
Shirley,
Please let me know if these directions are sufficient.
Thank you,
Laura
Route: http://www.mapquest.com/cgi-bin/mqtrip?shared_uid=e9n9m2eoya2ce8ll&link=btwn/twn-ddir_results_page&event=retrieve_route
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Bankruptcy 101
In an effort to educate employees about the nuts and bolts of bankruptcy, Enron is sponsoring five Bankruptcy 101 sessions next week. These sessions will focus on the basics of the bankruptcy process in general (not Enron specific).
When: Monday, January 28th - Friday, February 1st from noon until 1:00 daily
Where: 5C2 in Enron Center North
Each session is limited to 50 participants, so you must RSVP if you would like to attend. Simply select a button above to indicate the date you would like to attend. You will then be sent a confirmation email. Note: This does not automatically post your calendar. The sessions will be filling up quickly--so don't delay in reserving your spot!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Kay, can you set up a one hour to half an hour with each if possible.
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000
03:18 PM ---------------------------
Shawn Cumberland@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/06/2000 02:02 AM
To: David W Delainey@ECT, Kay Chapman@ECT
cc:
Subject: Contacts
Kay,
Dave asked me to send you a note to set up meetings for him with two of our
executives: Mariella Mahan and Dan Castagnola.
It sounded like he was thinking about Friday.
Shawn
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Kam asked that I email you guys about the FT-ONTARIO book move. Please move
the book for Price, Basis and Index from FT-ONT-CENTRAL to FT-ONTARIO. This
also encompasses splitting out the price and basis and fixing the curves in
the curve table. This needs to be done by Monday night, 7/31. Thanks for
you help and please shout with any questions.
PL
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I'll be in NY/D.C. I'm willing to do by phone. Thanks.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Agustin,
I am trying to confirm the counterparty on one of your deals so that it can
be properly assigned in TAGG. The ticket for the deal in question reads
Barcel Mexico. However, I spoke recently with Beatrice Reyna who informed me
that you believed the counterparty to be one of the Bimbo companies. If you
wouldn't mind looking into this and getting back to me with the correct
counterparty name it would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Susan
Deal Parameters - Costless Collar
Deal Date: 8/24/00
Delivery Point: Avg (IF-TETCO/STX and PGE)
Time Frame: 9/01/00 - 02/28/2001
Volume: 38,000 MMBTU/month
ENA Sells: $5.20 Call
ENA Buys: $4.00 Put
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- combo_5.exe
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
It's a very mixed web of information and people...it may take a while, but someone knows where all this information lies. Ganapathy is a great information source.
-----Original Message-----
From: Barone, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Scott, Susan M.
Subject: RE: ERMS and GERMS
Susan,
I contacted Jeremy and Nilay. They did not think that the gas curve relationship data was contained in ERMS, but they referred to me Ganapathy Ramesh who is familiar with RiskTrack. I am waiting for him to return my call.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott, Susan M.
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Bowler, Tim; Barone, Michael ; Considine, Keith; Smith, Mark Allan; Gronningsater, Eric
Subject: ERMS and GERMS
Francis Lim
Jeremy Wong
Nilay Basu
These individuals may now be with UBS, but they should know who to contact on the estate side.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 1/23/02; HourAhead hour: 17; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012317.txt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Steve:
I think I already forward these to you, but if not, they're the prices that
Henderson came up with for fully shaped prices to the utilities. May be
useful re: conversations with the Street about getting the utilities out of
procurement. Note that the date on the prices is 10.02.00 so they're
somewhat stale, but arguably still indicative. I'm also going to give you
the prices Belden just gave us (prior to the run up yesterday, though) for
prices at SP15.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/13/2000 01:11 PM -----
Ronnie Chahal@EES
10/02/2000 04:39 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: John Henderson/HOU/EES@EES, Peter Bray/TNPC/EES@EES, Matthew
Crouse/HOU/EES@EES, Ronnie Chahal/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Pricing for California utilities
Jeff;
Per our phone conversation, please find attached the pricing sheet.
Ronnie Chahal
713.853.3400
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Francesca,
It was nice meeting you in San Antonio.
An article from FT on IPOs in case you missed it.
Vince Kaminski
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Could you please send a template deemed Isda (without any specific terms and conditions and credit) to:
Mr. Hector Ibarra
e-mail: [email protected]
Thank you
Francisco Pinto-Leite
Enron Americas
1400 Smith Street, EB 3888
Houston, TX 77002-7361
Tel: 713-345-7942
Fax:713-646-3490
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 11/27/2000 02:23:42 PM
To: "Andy Brown (IEP)" <[email protected]>, Bob Escalante at Constellation
<[email protected]>, Curtis Keebler at Reliant
<[email protected]>, Greg Blue <[email protected]>, "Jack
Pigott @ Calpine" <[email protected]>, Jan Smutny-Jones <[email protected]>,
"Joe Ronan @ Calpine" <[email protected]>, John Stout for Reliant
<[email protected]>, "Julie @ Edson" <[email protected]>, "Karen
Denne, Enron" <[email protected]>, Karen Edson <[email protected]>, "Kassandra
Gough @ Calpine" <[email protected]>, Katie at IEP <[email protected]>, Lynn
Lednicky at Dynegy <[email protected]>, Marty Wilson <[email protected]>,
Paula Hall-Collins <[email protected]>, "Richard Hyde, Duke"
<[email protected]>, Rob Lamkin <[email protected]>, Roger
Pelote <[email protected]>, Stephanie Newell at Reliant
<[email protected]>, Steven Kelly <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Duke Energy proposes to manage SDG&E's entire electricity load for
five years
The note below was sent to the 20 or so reporters that I have been working
with on the CA electricity crisis.
FYI.
Below is a press release we distributed today that details a proposal we
have made to San Diego Gas & Electric to manage their entire electricity
load (up to 3,300 megawatts) for five years at a fixed price of $60 a
megawatt hour. The proposal was detailed in our comments to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission on their recent proposed solutions to
Caifornia.
As the release indicates, forward contracting for electricity is a very
effective way for the state's utilities to manage the volitility in the
state's electricity markets. With natural gas prices more than doubling
since last year and last week being up to seven times higher than last year
on the spot market (up to $19 a million BTU vs. an average of about $2.50
in 1999), we feel that its imperative for utilities to take advantage of
these contracts so they can manage their own risk exposure and their
customer's risk exposue to this volitility and the associated high prices.
(The price of natural gas represents about 90 percent of our plant's
operating costs).
We signed a forward power contract with PG&E Oct. 30 and Southern Cal
Edison Nov. 15 (announced for the first time in the this release). The
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission strongly encourages these kind of
contracts -- and we hope that we, or other wholesale power marketers, can
do more of this kind of business with these utilities and SDG&E in the very
near future to bring stability to the state's wholesale electricity market.
Our proposal is detailed on pages eight and nine in the FERC filing, which
also includes our other positions on the California electricity crisis.
These are also detailed on our CA web site at
www.Duke-Energy.com/California.
For more information, call me at 805-595-4270 or page me at 877-364-5170.
(See attached file: Nov 27 release.doc)(See attached file: Duke Nov. 22
FERC filing.doc)
- Nov 27 release.doc
- Duke Nov. 22 FERC filing.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi Vince and Happy New Year
Good to hear from you and I can understand being busy. I am myself trying to
balance my commitments here.
Like any research consortium Pserc is trying to provide value to its members
while walking the fine line between cooperation and competition. We are
definitely not in the business of providing proprietary research to the
members but rather working on more generic areas that later individual
members could see way to convert to proprietary tools. The work that Shijie
Deng and Rajnish Kamat have been doing with me are good examples.
As to my trip, thanks for the invitation but I already committed myself to
get back Friday night so I will save my visit for another time.
I will tell my son about the spring interviews at Cornell. Hopefully this
time he will not miss it.
Regards, Shmuel
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: PSERC nuggets related to market Stem
>
> Hello Shmuel,
>
> Thanks for your message. The end of 2000 and the beginning of 2001 were
> extremely busy
> and I could not focus on PSERC issues. I shall consult a few people in
> Enron on this subject and get in
> touch with you. Our concern right now is that the results of research are
> widely shared with
> our competition.
>
> I am out on the 19th, but the 20th would work for me. I would be glad to
> cover the cost of your Austin
> to Houston trip.
>
> Regarding your son. The Analyst / Associate program will interview again
on
> the campus
> in the spring and they will be more than happy to interview him.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Shmuel Oren" <[email protected]> on 12/19/2000 01:40:02 PM
>
> To: <[email protected]>
> cc: "Dennis Ray" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Fw: PSERC nuggets related to market Stem
>
>
> Hello Vince
> Happy Holidays.
> I wanted to connect with you regarding the possibility of Enron Joining
> PSERC. As you might have heard from Lance and Alex we are going through a
> transition period having doubled the number of universities and industry
> members within the last year. Consequently, our business processes are not
> well developed. One of the problems we are facing is the balance between
> the
> electrical engineering folks and industry members that are more interested
> in market related research. I hope to recruit more of the later so tat we
> have more of a constituency in the Advisory Board that sees the value of
> market related research. I already have a verbal commitment from people at
> Electrabell that expressed interest in joining PSERC. With members like
> Electrabell and Enron we will be able to support more market Stem projects
> such as the one that Shijie Deng proposed (not funded in this round).
> Please
> let me know if I can do anything to facilitate the decision at Enron. I am
> going to be in Austin on January 19 to participate at a PUCT hearing and
> could come through Huston for a visit. Attached are some items that I
> shared
> with our PSERC members and thought that you might be interested in them as
> well.
> Regards, Shmuel.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shmuel Oren" <[email protected]>
> To: "Power Systems Engineering Research Center" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 9:47 AM
> Subject: Re: PSERC nuggets related to market Stem
>
>
> > The following are 3 items that demonstrate the impact of PSERC research
> in
> > the market stem area.
> >
> > 1. On December 12, I (Shmuel Oren) testified at a hearing in San
> Francisco
> > before the Blue Ribbon Panel (chaired by Alfred Kahn) for the that is
> > investigating the implications of Uniform Price vs. Pay as Bid Auctions
> in
> > the California PX . As part of my testimony I presented a movie produced
> by
> > Tim Mount and Bob Thomas that show results of an experimental economic
> study
> > showing how bidders respond by raising their bids in a pay as bid
> auction.
> > Following is an acknowledgement I received.
> >
> > Dear Shmuel:
> >
> >
> > Thank you for attending the Blue Ribbon Panel this past Tuesday in San
> > Francisco. Your presentation was very informative and valuable to all
> the
> > panel members and other participants. The Panel greatly appreciates
your
> > involvement in this important project.
> >
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Natalie Efland
> >
> >
> > 2. A recent E-mail from the Texas PUC
> >
> > Professor Oren, I hope you and your family are doing well. We are
> seriously
> > considering your help and advice to facilitate the Commission's final
> > decision regarding retail competition in ERCOT.
> >
> > I wanted to let you know that ERCOT Stakeholders filled an Application
> for
> > Approval of the ERCOT Protocols in November. We received Comments
> including
> > List of Issues on November 22 and Reply Comments on December 1. Staff
> will
> > draft and submit a Preliminary Order to the Commissioners for their
> > discussion on December 13. There will be a Pre-hearing on December 15
> when
> > parties will be asked to brief the Commission on list of issues by the
> end
> > of first week in January. There will be a Hearing on January 16
followed
> > with another Hearing if needed. Parties have asked the Commission to
> > finalize its decision by mid March.
> >
> > To give you some more background, I have to mention that almost most of
> your
> > suggestions were accepted and will be reflected in the final Protocols,
> > except for problems with intra-zonal gaming regarding congestion
> management
> > and Pay-As-Bid compensation for selected ancillary services. A few
> > additional concerns are raised regarding ancillary services and
> congestion
> > management. Stakeholders are still working toward more load
> participation
> > in ERCOT market. However, the main problem is the fact that market
> (pilot
> > that covers 100% of wholesale, but only 5% of retail load) will be open
> on
> > June 1, 2001 based on a version of the Protocols locked on August 1,
> 2000.
> > (That was the deadline for ERCOT to give a final design to Anderson
> > Consulting.) That version does not include some of your recommendations
> to
> > address market design flaws. The full version is highly possible to be
> > implemented by January 1, 2002 when market for 100% retail competition
is
> > scheduled to open. Given this gap, some parties have recommended not to
> > implement incomplete Protocols and wait for full implementation by
> January
> > 2002. In other words, they say let's go ahead with 5% pilot retail
load,
> > but wait for full design implementation before allowing 100% wholesale
> load
> > (and retail load) be subject to the rules of the game described in the
> final
> > Protocols.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Parviz Adib, Ph. D.
> > Director of Market Oversight Division
> > Public Utility Commission of Texas
> > 1701 N. Congress Avenue
> > P.O. Box 13326
> > Austin, Texas 78711-3326
> > Ph. No.: 512-936-7365
> >
> > 3. The following is a segment from a published summary of the Dec 13
PUCT
> > hearing. This segment describes the commision's deliberation on an
agenda
> > item addressing the possibility of instituting price caps as part of the
> > ERCOT protocols. (see reference to my involvement in the next to last
> > paragraph)
> >
> > Docket No. 23220 - Petition of the Electric Reliability Council of
> Texas
> > for Approval of the ERCOT Protocols. (Discussion and possible action)
> > Parviz Adib, Jess Totten, Keith Rogas, and Tammy Cooper
> > Chairman Wood turned to page 2 item number 3 of the draft order
> identifying
> > issues, recommending that the word "including" be changed to "other
than"
> in
> > the parentheses. He thinks they know the ups and downs of the two
> > mechanisms, which are bid caps and price caps, but would not mind having
> > parties focus on what other protections might be used. Commissioner
> Walsh
> > would say "including, but not limited to" because she does not think it
> is
> a
> > bad idea for ERCOT to at least consider in their protocols a fail-safe
> > mechanism. It's kind of like the stock market suspending trading when
> > something crazy happens. They could consider a maximum scenario, such
as
> > "we don't think this will ever happen but if it does we need to muffle
> it",
> > whether it is $1,000 or $99 or whatever it is. They could consider
> whether
> > to put into the protocols a self-enacting price cap. While not
expecting
> it
> > to happen, if it did, you don't have to declare it an emergency and have
> the
> > Commission have to act. Chairman Wood asked if they could leave the
> > question without the parenthetical at all and just say "what protections
> > should be added to avoid extreme price spikes." Commissioner Walsh
> > reiterated that she wants ERCOT to think about the unlikely possibility
> of
> > unacceptable price spikes. She would like for them to have their own
> > fail-safe mechanism that is self-initiating as opposed to leaving that
to
> > having someone have to come in and act. Commissioner Perlman stated
that
> he
> > thinks the California-type price caps is what the concern is about. He
> > thinks everyone in this state is opposed to those, but he thinks the
> point
> > Commissioner Walsh is making is an interesting one. He had not thought
> > about the circuit breaker idea, and it might have some merit. He agreed
> > that it was worth considering something like that. Then the question
> > becomes what the level is. Chairman Wood suggested the wording "what
> > self-implementing protections should be added to avoid the price spikes.
> > Commissioner Perlman said he did not think anyone is talking about $250
> > price caps. Commissioner Walsh agreed, but noted that if the unexpected
> > happens we should be prepared. Commissioner Perlman indicated that if
> > someone is making $10,000 in one particular hour that it probably does
> not
> b
> > enefit the market and is probably a windfall to them. It is not
> something
> > they would normally put in their business plan for determining whether
> they
> > are going to build a plant in Texas. Chairman Wood stated that they
want
> to
> > lean toward the market as heavily as they can on these issues.
> >
> > Chairman Wood noted that some of these issues date back to when Dr. Oren
> was
> > assisting the Commission, and asked if he could be brought back again.
> > Staffer Dr. Parviz Adib said that staff had already talked to Dr. Oren
> and
> > that he is available to assist the Commission further. Chairman Wood
> noted
> > that Dr. Oren had helped people think outside the box without just
> focusing
> > on California.
> >
> > The final wording was clarified to state "self-implementing mechanisms"
> and
> > to delete the parenthetical part of the sentence in question. The order
> was
> > approved as amended.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Would you look at this first warrant swap one last time to be sure you think
we got it! Thanks.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I think it's a fair statement that Enron doesn't currently support the Barton language. On this issue, I would argue that any penalty imposed should remain the purview of FERC and its procedures.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Perrino, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:13 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Shelk, John; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah
Subject: RE: Chairman Barton's Draft
Christi,
No, my concern was more of an organization like "NERC" imposing financial penalties on a grid user. I thought our postion was that an RTO through its tariff rules or FERC could impose any penalties, but not a reliability organization.
Thanks,
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Shelk, John; Perrino, Dave; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah
Subject: FW: Chairman Barton's Draft
I do have a concern from the standpoint that users are ultimately at the scheduling mercy of the operator. The operator can cut our schedule. Perhaps this is referencing something like reserves, where a user/load serving entity may have gone under the reserves and it gets some penalty?
-----Original Message-----
From: Perrino, Dave
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject: RE: Chairman Barton's Draft
Christi,
Does
"Section 216(e)(1) authorizes an electric reliability organization to impose a penalty on the user or owner or operator of the bulk power system if it finds, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, that the user or owner or operator violated a reliability standard. Section 216(e)(2) provides for notice to FERC of penalties imposed by an electric reliability organization, and authorizes FERC to affirm, set aside or modify any penalty imposed by an electric reliability organization. Section 216(e)(3) authorizes FERC to assign enforcement of reliability standards to regional transmission organizations. Section 216(e)(4) authorizes FERC to enforce reliability standards and impose penalties on user or owner or operator of the bulk power system if FERC finds, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, that the user or owner or operator has violated or threatens to violate a reliability standard and this action affects or threatens to affect reliability of the bulk power system. Section 216(e)(5) authorizes FERC to take such action as is necessary or appropriate against an electric reliability organization"
Give us heartburn?
Just wondering,
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:43 PM
To: Lindberg, Susan; Comnes, Alan; Perrino, Dave; Walton, Steve
Cc: Shelk, John; Steffes, James D.; Hueter, Barbara A.; Guerrero, Janel; Novosel, Sarah
Subject: FW: Chairman Barton's Draft
Susan --Can you check with Ben Jacoby and Fletcher Sturm on the TVA parts and with Rogers Herndon on the retail consumer aggregation parts.
West guys--BPA is discussed in this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Shelk, John
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:37 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Lindberg, Susan
Subject: Chairman Barton's Draft
Attached are: (1) highlights summary; (2) section-by-section summary; and (3) almost 150 pages of leg text (PDF doc) on Chairman Barton's draft electricity restructuring bill. The RTO and bundled/unbundled sections will be provided "soon" (they day) (I am meeting with Mr. Barton's staff in a half hour), but there are "voluntary RTO" provisions in the incentive pricing section since they lifted that language from Burr-Sawyer legislation. Mr. Barton has publicly said his addedum will mandate RTO participation at some point; I should know more after the meeting. The draft below addresses a variety of issues, including TVA, BPA, etc., among others, that we also care about. There is a retail consumer aggregation feature toward the end. If you could look at the summary and section-by-section and let me know particular areas of interest/concern for further review that would be helpful. Barton is taking comments through this week and next week.
<< File: BartonDraftHighlights092101.doc >> << File: BartonDraftSecBySec092101.doc >> << File: discussion draft september 21.PDF >>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Presentation is at 3:00, room 2236, Bayou Building, Geynille Dillingham
coordinating
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI - those of you running firm books. These adjustments described below are
due to firm book PMA's we recieve from Tiffany Miller. In the future, we
need to put these in the appropriate schedules - C & E. Schedule C should be
used for MTM adjustments and Schedule E should be used for all other
adjustments. Shout with any questions.
PL
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
08:42 AM ---------------------------
Jeffrey C Gossett
03/12/2001 08:03 AM
To: Greg Whiting/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Topside adjustments to rolls
Please clarify. Thanks.
Greg Whiting@ENRON
03/09/2001 02:38 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elaine Schield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Topside adjustments to rolls
Jeff,
I need your help with a few items. In the DPR rolls for several books this
month there were topside adjustments inserted. It was my understanding that
all topsides would be included on the associated roll schedules (Sch E and
Sch C). Investigating all of these is greatly increasing our reconciliation
time. Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Here are a few
books that had topsides:
MTM Topsides that should have been on Schedule C
GD-Central
FT-Texas
FT-Central
Liquidation topsides that should have been on Schedule E
GD-Central
FT-Northwest
FT-Ontario
Let me know if you need more information or if there is anything we can do to
help. Thanks.
Greg x35399
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
i'll put in place procedures when I am away but correct me to date only
companies that have come through our office have been put on.
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re:
Thanks for your response!
On online, when there are Australian counterparties I will just wait to hear
from you and include your responses with mine (even tho you will probably
tell me they can only trade Australian power!). Do you have a back up yet?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I have actually talked with these guys before. More than a year ago I
think. I may have an old copy of their business plan. The guy I talked to
was Frank Levy, their CEO. Just out of curiosity I would like to talk to
them again to see if they have anything going.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Perkins, Mary
Sent: 21 May 2001 15:24
To: McAndrew, Anna
Cc: Kemp, Sam; Jordan, Mike; Hicks, Ann
Subject: RE: Message from Anna McAndrew & Sam Kemp - Operational Risk in TWS
Sam & Anna,
I agree that GCP should be the source for counterparty data and, as you have indicated, this is currently the case. I disagree that the functionality in TWS represents a fraud or control risk. There is segregation of responsibilities within TWS which requires 2 different individuals to either initiate or change payment instruction. This control has been audited repeatedly and has been determined to be sound and adequate control. As with any bank operation, it is necessary for Treasury to be able to correct fatal errors.
We have implemented procedural controls so that GCP is notified of any issues with counterparty data. I understand that GCP is responding promptly. If you find a deficiency in this area, please let me know and we will do whatever is necessay to ensure that adequate communication is undertaken.
I understand there may be some issues related to payments executed from NY bank accounts. I'd be pleased to discuss this issue.
I look forward to meeting with you this week.
Mary
-----Original Message-----
From: McAndrew, Anna
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:26 AM
To: Perkins, Mary
Cc: Kemp, Sam; Jordan, Mike
Subject: Message from Anna McAndrew & Sam Kemp - Operational Risk in TWS
Mary
We are in the porcess of reviewing the Control environment within Settlements in London. This review has included the interaction between Settlements and Cash Management / TWS system.
One issue which we have identified is that the Cash Management Team have the ability in TWS to change the counterparty bank account details which have been fed into TWS via GCP and SAP. Whilst procedurally, the cash management team do not edit these details, the fact remains that they could if they wanted to. At best this presents operational risks (someone might edit the details in error) and at worst, presents opportunity for fraud.
In order to ensure effective segregation of duties and minimise the operational risk we would like to remove the ability for the Cash Management Team to make these changes and restrict the entry point for this data just to the GCP Team. We understand from Anne Hicks that you would need to sign off on such a functional / coding change in TWS.
Sam Kemp, Head of GCP, and I are in Houston next week and I believe we have some time in your diary so we can discuss. In the interim, we would welcome any initial thoughts you might have.
Kind regards
Sam & Anna
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Robert,
Absolutely. This is a critical situation.
Vince
Robert Johnston
01/16/2001 08:02 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: California Power 1/15/01
Vince- Kristin mentioned that you might be interested in receiving our daily
updates on the California situation. Hope that you are doing well and let us
know if you require any additional information.
RJ
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
08:08 AM ---------------------------
Robert Johnston
01/15/2001 09:10 PM
To: Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jaime Gualy/NA/Enron@Enron, John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: California Power 1/15/01
As talks continued toward the Tuesday deadline markets have been focused on
for the California electricity crisis, state officials around Governor Gray
Davis have
toughened up their rhetoric on a couple of fronts even as they confirmed
they would be in the market as early as Tuesday taking bids for energy to be
paid by the
State of California. One problem on that front is still how much producers
want to charge the state for electricity. As we reported last week, Davis and
his aides
want to pay around $50 to $55 dollars per megawatt hour and suppliers want
about $75. Treasury Secretary Summers has suggested an auction as the best
way to
determine the price, but California officials are taking a less free market
approach and still hope to set the price through negotiation over long-term
contracts.
Our sources in Washington, Sacramento, and California are increasingly of the
view that Governor Davis is positioning his government to establish long-term
power contracts with the generators that could be passed through to the
utilities following a bankruptcy in the near term. This week's legislative
activities
in Sacramento will create the vehicle to do so. State credit backing
purchases of power would obviate the need for super-priority borrowing to
finance power
purchases after utility bankruptcy.
1. Audit- Untangling Utility Relationships
California officials have also toughened their rhetoric on the debt repayment
front as they say results from a preliminary audit show that
half of the $9 to $12 billion the utilities say they owe is actually owed to
themselves for power they bought from their corporate relations
This strange situation is due to the fact that one holding company owns both
the power-generating and power-distributing companies under a
holding company umbrella. Of course, that means that some of the power PG&E
and Southern California Edison bought at highly inflated prices
was bought from themselves.
But it was not all bad news in the tense negotiations. Sources confirm that
Davis increasingly understood that the state finance role was a crucial part
of any
potential solution. He told our sources this afternoon that he is willing to
use state credit to eliminate the "risky debt" premium that PG&E
and SCE are being charged by suppliers because of their shaky finances and
that he is willing to extend the current 10% rate increase
utility customers are paying far beyond the initial 90-day deadline. In
return he is demanding that the companies prepare to "share the
burden of debt reduction in return for state help and credit extension."
2. Debt Restructuring- Guarantees, but No Direct State Money
Davis also told the videoconference that he believes the $12 billion in back
debt owed by the utility companies can be cleared up
during a 90-day forbearance period (whether that period has been agreed to by
all creditors is not something we are clear about right now). Davis' idea, as
he laid it out in the meeting, is to use the forbearance period to securitize
the debts and sell them against the utilities' forward rate base or by
establishing a
medium-term repayment plan backed by continued state guarantees.
In both cases the restructured debt would be resolved over a decade without
direct use of taxpayer money as the utilities use their positive margins to
paydown their debt. One of the reasons Davis wants to stay close to the
$50-$55 megawatt charge is that it maximizes the rate at which utilities can
pay
down this debt. There is a strong chance that Davis will agree to use state
guarantees to sweeten the pot at the end of these negotiations, but he remains
opposed to using direct state money. This frustrates both Clinton
administration and utility creditors, but Davis has not yet shown much
flexibility.
3. Eminent Domain/Reregulation
Perhaps most frustrating to the Washington DC free market crowd at Treasury
and the White House was the continued comfort Davis and his group of political
advisers have with "non-market" solutions to the energy crisis. Although
the Governor's aides actually believe the weapon is more a "way to force
eventual
agreement, than an actual solution," the talk returns frequently to these
non-market mechanisms. "We have the ultimate weapon to enforce compliance by
the
Tuesday deadline. If we make no progress. If this thing looks like it will
turn into a genuine crisis, then we will use our powers of condemnation and
we will re-take
the plants and equipment and run them ourselves," a close political aide to
Davis said. "We will absorb the plants, the transmission lines and the
reserved parking
places of the executives. The legislature would agree in a second."
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Amy 3-1628
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
MATTHEW SMITH,
Enron's Mid Year 2001 Performance Management Process has begun!
You can access the Performance Management System (PEP) at http://pep.enron.com with the User ID and Password below to complete your feedback. It is requested that you complete your feedback by May 25th, 2001.
Help Desk representatives will be available to answer questions throughout the process. You may contact the Help Desk at:
Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: [email protected]
London: 44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: [email protected]
Your User ID & Password for PEP at http://pep.enron.com are:
User ID: 90141641
Password: DY5ETA9V
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
no changes since last week
Elizabeth Serralheiro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/24/2000 01:15 PM
To: John Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sami
Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, [email protected],
[email protected], Sara Shackleton@ECT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Hopkinson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Gavino/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary Ann
Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cecilia
Morellato/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kaye Ellis@ECT, Ana Lucia
Liria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Luiz
Watanabe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nilza
Rabaneda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: ESA Legal Management Meeting's report
Please send me your updated report not later than 8:30 a.m. Brazil time,
tomorrow.
Thanks and regards,
Elizabeth.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Mtr 1600- A deal already exists for this meter (#159194). If you view the
meter in MOPS you can see the deal. (It had zero volume before today.)
Mtr 6725 - This gas is traded on the spot market, so there is no deal to put
in.
D
Jackie Young
04/06/2000 10:15 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 98-1600 & 98-6725 Needing K's
Daren,
I hate to be a pest but here's the deal on the above two meters:
98-1600 Sitara deal #159194 expired on 2/29/2000. The flow for 2/2000 was
on the 215K. This meter (del.) flowed 53.863 for 3/2000. There is no new
deal referenced, nor is the evergreen flag in effect.
98-6725 Sitara deal #214948 expired 3/27/2000. No evergreen and no new deal
referenced. This is a little premature but this meter is active monthly
and I'm thinking that it will flow for this month with no K being applied.
Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sabra: so thank you for giving blood, which means as much to me as the
playground equipment. Your support has been like everyone else's,
overwhelming. Take care.
Randy
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Specs:
K2 Disco Monkey (2000 model) Free Ride Mountain Bike. It's a part of the Zero Gravity Series by K2.
- Easton Frame
- Noleen Mega Air Fork and Mono Shock
- Formula Hubs
- Brand New Avid Mechanical Disc Brakes
- Avid Speed Dial 1.9L Brake Levers
- Shimano LX Shifters
- Shimano LX Front Derailer
- Shimano XT Rear Derailer
- Vuelta "Anti-Snake Bite" Rims
- New GEAX "Sturdy" tires (2.25)
- Truvativ "Firex" Cranks
- Richey SDP Clippless Pedals
I bought this bike Spring of 2000 for $2,300.00.
Will sell it for $1,000.00 (no less)
Thanks.
I can be reached at the house - 281-379-4974
Brandt S. Dozier & Associates
Telecommunication Consultants
(832) 717-4311 - Office
(281) 787-7974 - Mobile
(425) 962-9702 - Fax
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Kay, please book 9:00 am to 2:00 pm with me Mike Miller & Don Miller with
Mike Childers (Entergy) (actually 10 am to 1pm not including travel time to
their shop in the Woodlands) on September 5, 2000.
Regards
Delainey
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dick, Here are the details about the GPG PRC meeting. Please note that these
people have not been involved in the process for very long and thus, this may
not be the best example of how the process works. Nonetheless, it should
give you a flavor of how it works. When you get to the Enron Building,
please ask for me or my assistant, Twanda Sweet, and one of us will take you
to the conference room. Thanks a lot! Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 01:42
PM ---------------------------
Jennifer Milligan
07/18/2000 01:35 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: PRC Descriptors
GPG says that it is fine to have the consultant at their meeting. The GPG
Managers PRC meeting will be held in EB49C2 at 1:00 p.m. Please let me know
if I should contact him with additional directions.
(Is he flying in for this or located here?)
Thanks,
Jennifer
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Milligan/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000
01:31 PM ---------------------------
Gina Corteselli@ENRON
07/18/2000 12:53 PM
To: Jennifer Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: PRC Descriptors
Woul;d you kindly send the info to Michelle Cash and ask her whether she will
contact him or whether she wants us to do it?
Jennifer Milligan@ECT
07/18/2000 10:40 AM
To: Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: PRC Descriptors
GPG says its OK and the location is EB49C2 at 1:00 p.m. Who is contacting
him with this information?
Thanks,
Jennifer
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Milligan/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000
09:56 AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Lisa Costello @ ENRON 07/18/2000 09:41 AM
To: Jennifer Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: PRC Descriptors
Jennifer, Dave has OK'd this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Costello/OTS/Enron on 07/18/2000
09:45 AM ---------------------------
Jennifer Milligan@ECT
07/17/2000 10:53 AM
To: Dave Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Leesa Hutcherson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Wilson
Barbee/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: PRC Descriptors
Dave,
Michelle Cash (ENA Employment Attorney) has asked if the consultant described
below could sit in and observe during the GPG Managers PRC meeting. Would
this be acceptable to you?
Thanks,
Jennifer
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Milligan/HOU/ECT on 07/17/2000
10:48 AM ---------------------------
Gina Corteselli@ENRON
07/17/2000 09:48 AM
To: Jennifer Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kathryn McLean/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: PRC Descriptors
Michelle Cash has asked whether Dick Jeanrette might sit in on a PRC meeting
as an observer. We proposed that he attend the GPG Managers meeting on 20
July. Jennifer, please square this with GPG and get back to Michelle? Many
thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron on 07/17/2000
08:42 AM ---------------------------
Michelle Cash@ECT
07/14/2000 02:00 PM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea
Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kriste Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: PRC Descriptors
David/Cindy,
I have arranged for Dick Jeanrette, who is an industrial psychologist
specializing in employment matters, to assist us in the performance
evaluation process. Dick has worked for years with Exxon, which has a
process that sounds similar to ours, and has many ideas regarding the
process. The Exxon process has been challenged in court, and Dick has
testified about its process; the cases have been in favor of the company.
Thus, I believe his experience and insight will help us in our performance
management process.
I will be arranging a meeting with Dick in the next two weeks. Besides the
persons identified in this email, who should attend? You had mentioned Steve
Kean. Should he be involved as well? (FYI, he worked with Dick on Project
One).
Let me know if you have any questions.
Michelle
David Oxley
06/13/2000 06:55 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian
Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn McLean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gina
Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: PRC Descriptors
Michelle,
I had a voicemail from Cindy and Steve Kean relating to the change of wording
on the Satisfactory and Needs Improvement descriptors for this mid-year
review. Concern surrounds the apparent toughening of Satisf in particular and
a belief that this makes distributing names into bottom 2 categories harder.
I recall we changed wording due to some concerns you had expressed. Perhaps
you can restate them here for everyone.
However, regardless of above I remain of opinion that descriptors and labels
are proving a distraction from what should be a more relative process.
Perhaps the main message here is to convey something that helps us put these
descriptors in the context of a guide only (starting point or indicative
illustration) rather than absolute scale.
Bottom-line it is rather difficult to see how we could change any of this for
the mid year.
David
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sharon Brown
ETS Gas Control
713-853-5660
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sara,
Only if we are discussing where I should go on my next vacation. Friday will
be fine.
Clem
Sara Shackleton@ECT
02/07/2001 09:45 AM
To: Clement Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: LUNCH on Thursday, 2/8
CLEM:
I just got dragged into a lunch meeting tomorrow (re: Whitewing ) so I have
to bag lunch. Will Friday work? Maybe you want to go to the meeting!
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI - I have not changes to suggest.
Michael
--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
Energy Supply and Marketing
626-302-2029
----------
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 7:51 AM
To: Cherry, Brian - TPBKC; 'MBD'; 'Leslie, John'; 'Elsesser, Evie';
'McCrea, Keith'; 'Pocta, R. Mark'; 'Dasovich, Jeff'; 'Beach, Tom';
'Burkholder, John'; 'Amirault, Paul'; Alexander, Michael S; 'Chancellor,
Craig'; 'Dingwall, B.'; 'Douglass, Dan@SES'; 'Fawcett, Jeff'; Porter,
Douglas K; 'Rochman, Michael'; 'Counihan, Rick'; 'Bayless, David'; 'Paul,
Joe'; 'Jimison, John'; 'Foss, Robert'; McVay, Nancy W - TPNWM; 'Gileau,
Pat'; 'Johnson, Pamela'; 'How-Downing, Lindsey'; 'Scott, Susan'; 'Baldwin,
Mark'; 'Jun, Christine'; Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; Sullivan, Glen J.
Subject: Rebuttal testimony (draft) on behalf of TW
Transwestern has drafted the attached rebuttal testimony in response
to
testimony filed by Kern River and the Post-Interim Settlement
parties.
Please let me know if you have comments.
(See attached file: GIR Rebuttal.doc)<<File: GIR Rebuttal.doc>>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
> I will be around this week. It's hard to predict my schedule, so just call
> anytime.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: john jesse <[email protected]>@ENRON
>
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-john+20jesse+20+3Cjj+40johnjesse+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.c
om> ]
>
>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 12:00 PM
> To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
> Subject: Re: Venini
>
>> Hi John, hope you've been well. Is the Venini still available? What
> is
>> the year? Jeff
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: john jesse <[email protected]>@ENRON
>>
>>
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-john+20jesse+20+3Cjj+40johnjesse+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.c
> om> ]
>>
>>
>> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 8:44 AM
>> To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
>> Subject: Venini
>>
>> Dear Jeffrey. . .attached is an image of the Venini vase which is
> etched
>> on
>> the base Venini Murano Italy and is 9 3/4 ins high. Price is ?2200
>>
>> The Knox vase is best seen in Steve Martins book...(the same model
> but
>> same
>> date 1905. My one is 9 1/2 ins tall. Price ?11000
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> John
>> Email: [email protected]
>> - Venini3.jpg << File: Venini3.jpg >>
>>
> Hi Jeff. . .Yes the Venini is still available and the date can only be
> described as circa 1950's. It has the three line etched mark Venini
> Murano Italia.
>
> Are you in your office over the next few days so that I can find a slot
> to
> give you a call. Please suggest a time.
>
> I hope you didn't have any trouble with Hurricane Alison. . .
> --
>
> Regards
> John
> Email: [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
I have taken the Venini Fazzoletto vase to the Packing shop today, addressed
to Smith St and you should receive it early next week. The price of ?2100
should be deducted from your ?10000 credit. But let me know what you want
to do
--
Regards
John
Email: [email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
STEVE HERE'S THE AGENDA FOR LAS VEGAS!!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Ray, if Mark does not have any other comments - lets go ahead and send the
memo out ASAP.
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
02:41 PM ---------------------------
Raymond Bowen
07/12/2000 12:48 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron
cc: Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revised Organization Memo
Dave/Mark,
Attached is a revised memo reflecting Dave's comments. Please let me know if
you have any further thoughts. For the rest of the week, I am going to be at
Edward Ondarza's offsight, but I can be reached via cell phone (713-416-6429)
or via email. Marsha (x33356) can also track me down.
Thanks,
Ray
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I suggest the changes as shown on the attached.
Chris is researching a drawing number so that we have them committed to a
certain specification.
I've added the concept of a date certain for the delivery. I'm referring to
these as "Equipment" and part of the "Units" so it is clear that the
warranties apply.
Is there any change to the sound guaranty level (or other guarantees) for the
units utilizing these stacks?
Kay
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: [email protected], Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: LM6K Change Order #2
Kay:
Attached is Change Order #2 which has the changes Chris Booth made and a few
minor type type changes I made. I don't know Chris Calger or his title, so
if you would like me to obtain his signature, please advise.
Kathy
x56400
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Kinda of like a Mary in a Bathtub, only different.
ckm
Heather Kroll@ECT
10/31/2000 03:55 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Halloween Goody
This is pretty funny.
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 03:55
PM ---------------------------
"O'Brien, Karen [IBD]" <[email protected]> on 10/31/2000 03:35:52 PM
To: "'bob masco'" <[email protected]>, "'christine oliviero'"
<[email protected]>, "Hobson, Cynthia P [IBD]"
<[email protected]>, "'Clare Reed'" <[email protected]>, "'Clare
Reed'" <[email protected]>, "'Colleen O'Brien'" <[email protected]>,
"'Dennis'" <[email protected]>, "'flea'" <[email protected]>,
"'FOB'" <[email protected]>, "'Glenn'" <[email protected]>, "'heather'"
<[email protected]>, "'jimmy spillane'" <[email protected]>, "'Joan
D'" <[email protected]>, "'Linda S.'" <[email protected]>, "'marie
alexandru'" <[email protected]>, "Obrien, Michael [CITI]"
<[email protected]>, "'Steve Pinado'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Halloween Goody
<<PUMPKINCJ.JPG>>
- PUMPKINCJ.JPG
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
This letter is the last part of the contract:
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Ken
Grateful if you could cast your eye over this marketing letter
Thanks.
Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 05/09/2000 19:15
---------------------------
Amita Gosalia
05/09/2000 15:41
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Letter to MG Customers
Hi J
Can you please comment
Tx
A
---------------------- Forwarded by Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT on 05/09/2000 15:43
---------------------------
Fiona Grant
05/09/2000 13:47
To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Letter to MG Customers
Amita -- here are my comments (don't believe I have sent these on to you
yet!). What are the plans for approvals, etc.? Can I circulate to
McKeever, Hutchinson and Farmer for input (i.e. as the generic letter)?
Thanks, Fiona
Amita Gosalia
04/09/2000 08:26
To: Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Letter to MG Customers
Hi Fiona
Sorry - forgot to send it to you last week.
Please let me know whether the addition of some info would make this suit
your needs as well as ours.
Regards
Amita
---------------------- Forwarded by Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT on 04/09/2000 08:28
---------------------------
Molly Hellerman@ENRON
31/08/2000 00:20
To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Schorr/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Letter to MG Customers
Thanks a lot for your feedback, We have incorporated your suggestions and
have revised the letter. We have tried to make it more concise and less
EnronOnline/MITS specific.
Please let us know what you think. Your view points are appreciated.
Jayshree and Molly
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I'm fine and agree that it's more about the reasoning than the right answer.
I don't feel strongly about the recommendation, just wanted to throw out
something for folks to shoot at and to highlight that A/R and inventory
turnover is big problem. (Though without A/R and inventory turnover
convenants, I don't know if I'd do the deal.) Thanks for doing the finishing
touches.
Best,
Jeff
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The following is the spreadsheet for the Texas Desk.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Jeff,
A GSPP alum at APPA is interesting in co-sponsoring the GSPP forum. Any
objection? I won't contact others until we discuss Enron's position on
co-sponsorship.
Rob
Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Cara Freeland-Semperger
Enron North America
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306
Portland, OR 97204
503/464-3814
Fax: 503/464-3740
I will be out on medical leave until 2/5/02.
-----Original Message-----
From: Moon, Coyote [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Multiple Committees
Subject: RE: Request for Information for Data Base
coyote moon
Sempra Energy Solutions HQ-09
101 Ash Street
San Diego, CA 92101
C. Moon
Power Analyst
Sempra Energy Solutions
Desk: 619.696.3108
Cell: 619.540.5473
Fax: 619.696.3102
[email protected]
619.696.3102
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [ <mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:02 PM
To: Multiple Committees
Subject: Request for Information for Data Base
ELECTRONIC SCHEDULING WORK GROUP (Partial Listing)
We have received information that you are a member of the new
Electronic Scheduling Work Group. This group will be part of our
new 2002 Directory and Calendar of Meetings. Therefore, we will
need information from you to complete our listing.
Please furnish me with the following:
Complete Name
Mailing Address
Phone Number
Fax Number
Please provide this information as soon as possible. Our goal is to
complete this directory by Friday at the latest.
Thank you for your assistance.
Evelyn Emerson
Senior Administrative Coordinator
PH (801) 582-0353
FX (801) 582-3918
EM [email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Thank you Frank. That means alot.
-----Original Message-----
From: Acuff, Frank
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:06 PM
To: Horton, Stanley
Subject: Re: Thanksgiving Holiday
Stan,
Thanks for thinking of us during these trying times. In light of the Enron issues I realize how hard it must have been for you to enjoy your time with your family for thanksgiving. To let you and those that must manage these hard times know, you all are in my thoughts and prayers, and I wish you well.
Sincerely,
Frank Acuff
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI.
Sami Arap
02/21/2000 10:06 AM
To: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Elizabeth Serralheiro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, [email protected], Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Direct Sales - Weekly Update Report
Please see attached.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Shelley, below is the TW information for December 1, 2001
(1) ENA did not nominate on Transwestern for 12/01/01.
(2) EES Contract 25980 - Nominated Scheduled
2100 0 PRR LaMaquina Plant (POI 500539) did not confirm
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
CITY GISID EMPLOYEE_NAME
Calgary 52 Employees Office
Chicago 5 Employees Enovate Joint Venture - discussion pending on fate
Denver 3 Employees To be discussed
Dublin 1 Employee At home
Houston 699 Employees Office
Monterrey 3 Employees To be discussed
New York City 2 Employees To be discussed
Norcross 1 Employee At home
Portland 78 Employees Office
San Francisco 2 Employees At home
Toronto 9 Employees Office
Washington 1 Employee At home
856 Employees
Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel: 713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Mark Haedicke will be out of the office from Tuesday, May 15, through Monday,
May 21. During his absence please contact Lance Schuler (extension 3-5419)
or Julia Murray (extension 3-4794) for assistance. Mark can be reached as
follows:
May 16-17 (Wednesday and Thursday nights)
The Miyako Hotel - Kyoto
Sanjo Keage
Kyoto, 605-0052
Japan
Phone: 81-75-771-7111/Fax: 81-75-751-2490
May 18-20 (Friday through Sunday nights)
Imperial Hotel - Tokyo
1-1 Uchisaiwai - Cho
1 - Chome
Chiyoda Ku Tokyo, 100 8558
Japan
Phone: 81-3-3504-1111/Fax: 81 3 3581 9146
Enron Japan Corp.
Otemachi 1st Square Building
West 11th Floor
1-5-1 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100-0004
Jane McBride: Phone: 81-3-5219-4553/Fax: 81-3-5219-4510
Mark will return to the office on Tuesday, May 22.
Thank you.
Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone: (713) 853-7906
Fax: (713) 646-2600
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Gerald:
Slight change. Mark doesn't want this to be an affidavit, per se. This
doesn't need to be a sworn, deposition-like document. He wants a signed
letter/statement covering the following four points (in numbered bullets or
otherwise):
1. On 29 September, 2000, 3 units at the Bammel Site were scheduled to be
running during the Baseline Period.
2. These units were NOT running during the Baseline Period due to an
unanticipated filming session for HPL,s 75th Anniversary celebration.
3. The units were left off during the Curtailment Period in an effort to help
reduce Reliant,s demand load.
4. In order to make up for lost operations during the Curtailment Period, the
units were run after the Curtailment was finished.
Also, who needs to sign this? Mark thinks it would probably be OK for him to
do it. Sorry for the confusion. Call me w/questions.
~John
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
+ The recent hike in oil prices pushed inflation up to 7.56% in the week
ending September 30.
+ Hyundai Motors India plans to invest an additional $350 million over 3
years to enhance its existing production capacity and launch new models.
+ The Ministry of Power opposed Enron India's proposal for trading in surplus
power.
USIBC Daily News
October 16, 2000
Agro/Patents/Pharma
October 16: U.S.-based Rice Tec Inc withdrew 4 out of 20 claims from its 1997
patent on basmati rice. The Hindustan Times (Print edition only)
October 16: The central government sanctioned a $77.7 million relief package
for farmers of the north Indian state of Punjab. The Food Corporation of
India had earlier decided to suspend procurement of paddy as it found the
crop was sub-standard. The Times of India <
http://www.timesofindia.com/today/16home3.htm>
?<http://www.hindustantimes.com/>
Broadcasting/Entertainment
October 16: The Indian government announced that private agencies would start
FM radio broadcast on schedule in four major cities. The Times of India <
http://www.timesofindia.com/today/16busi13.htm>
Communications
October 16: Usha Telecom Ltd has decided to pay its entire outstanding
cellular-license fees of $70.2 million to the Department of
Telecommunications (DoT). This follows Usha Telecom's bid to sell its
cellular licenses. The Times of India <
http://www.timesofindia.com/today/16busi2.htm>
October 16: Southern Railways has completed an optic fiber cable network in
Tamil Nadu.? The Financial Express (Print edition only)
Economic/General News
October 16: The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Assocham)
stated that the slowdown in industrial growth (down to 5.3% during
April-August 2000) is expected to continue for the next 6 months. The
Financial Express <
http://www.financialexpress.com/fe/daily/20001016/fex16035.html>
October 16: The recent hike in oil prices pushed inflation up to 7.56% in the
week ending September 30, compared to 6.06% in the previous week. This is the
first time inflation has risen beyond 7% since the introduction of a new
index in April 2000. Business Standard <
http://www.business-standard.com/today/economy7.asp?Menu=3>
Energy
October 16: The National Oil Company of Oman is likely to purchase a 26%
equity stake in Bina Refinery of Bharat Petroleum. The Economic Times (Print
edition only)
Financial: Trade & Investment
October 16: CVD International, a U.S.-based entertainment hardware/software
development company, is likely to purchase 20% of Hyderabad-based Prathina
Video Private Ltd. The Financial Express (Print edition only)
October 16: Hyundai Motors India has decided to invest an additional $350
million over 3 years to enhance its existing production capacity and launch
new models. The Financial Express <
http://www.financialexpress.com/fe/daily/20001016/fco16031.html>
Information Technology
October 16: Cheecoo Networks announced its partnership with Yahoo-India.
Cheecoo Networks has a unique navigation, notification and communication
console. Cheecoo Networks will make Yahoo's popular services available to the
Internet community through their desktop application. The Financial Express
(Print edition only)
Insurance and Finance
October 16: The government finalized a cabinet note to amend the Banking and
Acquisition Act 1969. This will allow the government to reduce its ownership
percentage in nationalized banks to 67%. The Financial Express (Print edition
only)
Political/International
October 16: The Ministry of External Affairs confirmed that it received
requests from both Israel and the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) for
intervening in the West Asia peace process. However, the Indian government
offered only humanitarian aid and a general condemnation of the violence. The
Times of India (Print edition only)
Sanctions
Transportation/Infrastructure
October 16: The Ministry of Power opposed Enron India's proposal for trading
in surplus power. Enron plans to set up a wholly owned subsidiary and invest
$50-100 million to market power; including purchase of power from private
producers, transmission and distribution companies and state electricity
boards. The Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) has already referred
Enron's proposal to the Group of Ministers on foreign direct investment and
believes that power trading may be useful in reducing power losses. The
Economic Times (Print edition only)
October 16: India requires an investment of $65 billion to meet its urban
infrastructure needs, according to a paper prepared by the Confederation of
Indian Industry (CII). The Times of India ? <
http://www.timesofindia.com/today/16busi23.htm>
October 16: Indian financial institutions led by Industrial Development Bank
of India (IDBI) disbursed over $173 million to PPN, a 330 mw power project
based in Tamil Nadu. PPN will receive $73.6 million in rupee-denominated term
loans and a foreign currency loan of $93.7 million. The Financial Express <
http://www.financialexpress.com/fe/daily/20001016/fex16045.html>
==============================================================================
=
The USIBC Daily News is a free service of the U.S.-India Business Council to
USIBC Members and affiliates.
USIBC provides Internet links to news stories for informational purposes
only, and makes no representation
of the accuracy of information posted on other organizations' websites.? To
add or remove your name from this
list, or with questions or comments, please contact USIBC via e-mail at
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
U.S.-India Business Council
Website: <http://www.usibc.com>
1615 H Street NW
Washington DC 20062-2000
Phone 202 463 5492
Fax 202 463 3173
West Coast
477 Ninth Avenue, Suite 107
San Mateo, CA 94402
Phone 650 685 8790 xt. 16
Fax 650 343 2848
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Mr. Hellmold's second report does not contain a list of the documents or other
materials that he reviewed in preparing the report. I would appreciate
receiving such a list ASAP.
................................................
ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com
2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077
This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at [email protected] or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.
...............................................
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Daren:
I am taking over the Duke account from Katherine and am having trouble with
8/00 production. It looks like we have some spot deals included in the
exchange deal 157288. I think days 9 - 31, which are priced at GD - 0.10,
need to be moved to a new ticket if they are spot. Let me know if you
agree. Also, can you confirm for me that days 8/5 and 8/6 are suppose to be
exchange? The sale volume for those two days was zero, so there was no
exchange. We have not received any statements from Duke yet, so there is
nothing to verify our volumes.
You may also want to look at Sept. 2000 for deal 157288. It looks like spot
deals are being included in the exchange deal. Those will need to be moved
to a new ticket if they are spot.
Thanks,
Megan
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Connie,
I believe I misinterpreted your request. I have updated the list to include
every book we officialize each night.
DG 3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
03:17 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Darron C Giron 11/13/2000 01:46 PM
To: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Book Admin - West Desk
Connie,
I appologize for the tardiness of this list. I was out of the office last
Thursday and Friday. Please call if you have any questions.
DG 3-9573
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Please see attached as promised by Peter Styles just now.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The Meeting have been moved to EB2831
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
P.S. Nice use of "birthday" as the segue to the deal.
Speaking of birthdays, Prentice has informed me that, despite my
protestations (being a very low-key sort of guy), there "must" be some party
for my birthday this year (which I'm still opposed to--and I may be in
Houston that MONTH anyway).
I was thinking (cuz I hate spotlights), that it might be fun and interesting,
since your Dad and I are both hitting interesting birthdays this year, if we
had a joint party---double the people, double the fun. (I don't know if he'd
rather have a solo party for his, though.) And since my dad's met your dad,
but our mom's ain't been in the mix, I though it might be a good (and
hopefully safe) atmosphere to get them together in.
Am I smoking crack on the whole idea?
Cameron Sellers <[email protected]>
01/11/2001 12:16 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: you and me
Sorry for surprising you this morning!! Nothing wrong with being
comfortable in your birthday suit.
Speaking of birthdays, I think we should have a goal to get my company
acquired by your company by May 30, 2001. Good goal, huh??
I want to talk to you about the details I have been thinking about while you
were gone. When should we talk?? Let,s set up a meeting so we make sure to
move this all forward.
Welcome back.
-C
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Allison,
Philippe can be contacted via email at [email protected] or by phone
at 713 - 853-7698.
Thanks and good luck.
mike
"Allison Wright" <[email protected]> on 01/08/2001 10:05:47 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Computerworld's Premier 100 survey
Mike,
Thank you for your suggestion. I was hoping that you could either forward
this
message to Mr. Philippe Bibi or email me his contact information and I will
get
in touch with him. We are very interested in having someone represent Enron
in
our Premier 100 IT Leaders list.
Thank you in advance.
Allison
[email protected] on 01/05/2001 02:55:56 PM
To: Allison Wright/Computerworld@Computerworld
cc:
Subject: Re: Computerworld's Premier 100 survey
Allison,
Thank you very much for the email and request. As much as i an very proud
of our accomplishments while being responsible for Global Technology, I am
still of the opinion that Philippe Bibi is the best and most qualified
candidate from Enron. Enron has changed its culture and business around
technology and EnronOnline alone changed the way our business operates.
EOL ended the year over with over $330 billion in transactions. EOL was
only 1 part of our transformation however.
Thanks again and good luck with your award.
Sincerely,
Mike McConnell
"Allison Wright" <[email protected]> on 01/02/2001 09:58:45
AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Computerworld's Premier 100 survey
Hello again, Premier 100 nominee,
As you may recall, you were recently recommended by a colleague for
Computerworld's Premier 100 IT Leaders awards program. This annual list
identifies and honors the most innovative executives and professionals who
are
using technology to transform their business operations today.
We are now reviewing the finalists, but still hoping to hear from you in
time to
include you among those being considered for this prestigious award. All we
need
is a small chunk of your time to complete the attached survey, then return
it by
e-mail to [email protected] or fax it to (508) 875-8931 by
Tuesday,
January 9th.
Thank you very much for your time, and we hope to hear from you. If you
have
questions, or if I can help in any way, please don't hesitate to call me
directly.
Sincerely yours,
Maryfran Johnson
Editor in Chief
Computerworld
508 820 8179 (direct line)
[email protected]
(See attached file: P100 Final Survey word ver.doc)
(See attached file: P100 Final Survey word ver.doc)
- P100 Final Survey word ver.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Do you have the final reads for July and the new ones for August.
LC
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
TASK ASSIGNMENT
Status: completed
Task Priority: 1
Task Due On: 5/26/2000
Task Start Date: 5/26/2000
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
GRIFFITH, JOHN H,
?
You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance
Management process. Your feedback plays an important role in the process,
and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance
Management goals.
?
To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and
select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu. You may begin providing
feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed
by Friday, May 25, 2001.
?
If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: [email protected]
London: 44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: [email protected]
?
Thank you for your participation in this important process.
?
The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN." Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list. NOTE: YOU WILL
RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.
?
Employee Name:
MAYEUX, DAVID
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is a draft copy of an offer letter of a Joint Evaluation Agreement
we've been working on which will be sent to the counterparty for comments.
(See attached file: dowmou.doc)
- dowmou.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Then it's in correctly - thanks.
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/05/2001 11:40 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: apb checkout
the deal is on peak
thanks
Kate Symes @ ECT 02/05/2001 01:16 PM
To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: apb checkout
Looks like Tom forgot this deal on Friday - I've just entered it. Deal # is
514006. One thing I didn't check on was whether it was off-peak or on-peak.
Does this deal check out with APB? Let me know.
Thanks,
kate
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/05/2001 07:37 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: apb checkout
have you found out anything on this trade?
thanks
Kerri Thompson
02/02/2001 04:48 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: apb checkout
she says tom, i guess we can wait until monday.....
Kate Symes @ ECT 02/02/2001 04:38 PM
To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: apb checkout
I don't see any deals with any of these terms in Tom's trade log for today.
He's left the office, and I've left him a message on his cell phone - but
until then, I can't really say if this is good or not. Could it be a Mark
Fischer deal?
Kate
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/02/2001 02:26 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: apb checkout
missing deal for tom
buy bp energy
25 mw
217.50
march
palo verde
thanks
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
works for me.
PL
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Earl,
Long time...no nothing. How goes it? Just wanted to drop you a line and see how the fam's doing. Hope all is well. We really need to grab a drink after work sometime or a late afternoon coffee and catch-up on each other's respective endeavours.
Talk to you soon,
Susan
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
04:35 PM ---------------------------
From: Shalesh Ganjoo@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 11/07/2000 10:03 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: [email protected], Martin Lin/Contractor/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Shalesh Ganjoo/Contractor/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Technical Survey
Gentlemen,
We are attaching below a document on Internet Protocol (IP) written by
Martin. We hope you will find it informative and provide us with some feed
back to improve it. Shalesh is still working on documents for fiber optics
and storage. We felt that they were not complete and therefore not ready for
review. We hope to have them ready for your review soon. In the mean time
we would appreciate any comments you may have about the IP document. Thank
you.
Sincerely,
Shalesh and Martin
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I agree that we need to add our customer contacts to the list. This gives
them a great opportunity to look smart -- "we went to the market and got
price protection".
On the messages we need to include Mark's top three: 1) price caps cause
shortages (Rob Bradley: let's put some historical examples together)
Mona L Petrochko
07/18/2000 01:26 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer@EES,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Price Cap Media--DRAFT
I have a couple of suggestions on parts of the draft.
Media Action:
In addition to doing behind the scenes editorial board meetings and the like,
I would suggest that we get our coalition lined up and ready to release
statements for certain key events which are likely to occur over the next
several weeks, such as:
1. SDG&E's selection of the winning bid to their RFP. Even if Enron isn't
selected as the winning bid, the coalition should trumpet the market-based
solution and the enormous market response to SDG&E's RFP.
2. The Commission vote on UCAN's Emergency Motion. We should be prepared to
issue a statement whether the Cmmn votes with us or against us. With us, the
market can and did provide reasonable, expedient solutions to SDG&E's
customers and protection from price spikes. Against us, despite the
overwhelming market response, the Cmmn chose to ignore the market solutions
and impose more regulation.
3. Potential for ARM members to surface a Provider of Last Resort proposal
within the next couple of weeks.
4. ISO Bd. Mtg-keep up pressure against reducing price caps.
Coalition Members:
Agree that those groups listed should be contacted, although the CMA, CRA,
CIU, CLECA have been luke-warm in their advocacy.
I would add our customers (UC/CSU (especially the San Diego branch), PacTel,
etc.) NewEnergy has indicated that Kroger/Ralph's grocery stores, San
Diego-based, would give testimonials. I could solicit the members of ARM to
identify a key customer contacts for interviews.
We could check with our lobbyists and see who they would recommend (wine
growers, dairy industry, etc.) We should also consider the water agencies
and the rural counties and the City of Pittsburg. While the immediate
message is responding to San Diego's situation, this latter group of
potential coalition members would go to the larger message (keeping benefits
of competitive markets) from a state-wide perspective. What about the City
of Pittsburg?
Jeff Dasovich on 07/18/2000 10:07:00 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Kean, Mark Palmer, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Price Cap Media--DRAFT
Here's a draft. Given sense of urgency, I tried to develop a target for
folks to shoot at rather than The Perfect One-pager. So please fire at
will. In particular, need PR to fill in "Media Approaches" and "Key Message
Points."
Best,
Jeff
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Picture didn't come through. Sounds nice. Is there somewhere on the web I can see it.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: "Varsity Ecommerce" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:48 PM
To: Dorland, Chris
Subject: Re: Grand Cherokee
Did the picture not come through as an attachment in my last email?
I'll attach it again and hopefully you will be able to see it this time.
If not, it is the 60th Anniversary Limited - black exterior with the taupe
and agate interior...I thought it would be a good match for you and there
are only a few around and they are gorgeous.
Dwayne
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:39 PM
Subject: RE: Grand Cherokee
> Do you have a black one in stock? If so, what color interior?
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Varsity Ecommerce" <[email protected]>@ENRON
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:37 PM
> To: Dorland, Chris
> Subject: Re: Grand Cherokee
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> So you like black? Oddly enough that was the one I was thinking of
> too...
>
> Here's a picture...What do you think?
>
> By the way, I will be here on the 6th and 7th, so I will see you then.
>
> Take care,
> Dwayne
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:18 PM
> Subject: RE: Grand Cherokee
>
>
> > The colors that interest me most are black, silver, white, burgundy
> and
> > champagne. I will be in Calgary on Sept. 6/7 and I will give you a
> call.
> > Are you going to be in the office on those days?
> >
> > Chris Dorland
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Varsity Ecommerce" <[email protected]>@ENRON
> > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:48 AM
> > To: Dorland, Chris
> > Subject: Re: Grand Cherokee
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > I don't honestly know how long they will be available as our first
> 2002
> > arrived on Monday, so that would suggest that we aren't receiving
> any
> > more
> > 2001 models. There are still several available, but if we didn't
> have
> > your
> > 2001 in stock, I would locate it at another dealer and bring it in
> for
> > the
> > same price.
> >
> > The next step might also be to give me your top choices for
colours
> so
> I
> > can
> > keep an eye out for you.
> >
> > By the way, my work number is 730-4000, or toll-free
> 1-866-881-1888.
> >
> > Take care,
> > Dwayne
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:41 AM
> > Subject: RE: Grand Cherokee
> >
> >
> > > Thank you very much. How long would it take to get something
like
> this
> > in?
> > > I will be in Calgary on Sept. 6/7 and will come by and see you.
> Could
> > you
> > > e-mail me your work phone number.
> > >
> > > Thanx
> > >
> > > Chris Dorland
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "Varsity Ecommerce" <[email protected]>@ENRON
> > > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:25 AM
> > > To: Dorland, Chris
> > > Subject: Re: Grand Cherokee
> > >
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > I am attaching the breakdown on a Grand Cherokee that matches
> your
> > > request
> > > as closely as possible.
> > >
> > > The MSRP on the unit is $51,570 with pretty well every
> conceivable
> > > option -
> > > I can get you this Grand Cherokee for the cash price of
> $45,188
> > > including
> > > rebates.
> > >
> > > Take a look at the attachment and let me know if you have any
> > questions
> > > or
> > > comments.
> > >
> > > Have a great day,
> > >
> > > Dwayne
> > >
> > > - Chris.RTF << File: Chris.RTF >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> **********************************************************************
> > > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> > affiliate
> > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
> use
> of
> > the
> > intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure
> by
> > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient
> (or
> > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
sender
> or
> > reply
> > to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and
> delete
> > all
> > copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
are
> not
> > intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence
> > a
> > binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
its
> > affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
> not
> > be
> > relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise.
> > Thank you.
> > >
> **********************************************************************
> > >
> >
> >
>
> - 60thAnniversaryGC.jpg << File: 60thAnniversaryGC.jpg >>
>
- 60thAnniversaryGC1.jpg << File: 60thAnniversaryGC1.jpg >>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Response to Tarpey on Schnitzer/Tierney (303)575-6491
Thorn--Linda Breathitt
Mont Hoyt
Set up meeting with Dan Richard, Rick and maureen
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Shortridge, Pat
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:09 PM
To: McCarty, Danny
Cc: Robertson, Linda; Hartsoe, Joe
Subject:
This article demonstrates the difficulty Bingaman will have trying to change current law and roll over the Alaskans.
Pat Shortridge
Article from Today's CQ Monitor
Terrorist Attacks May Tilt Gas
Pipeline Route Toward Alaska
The debate over federal support for
a pipeline to transport natural gas
from the North Slope oil fields of
Alaska to the lower 48 is expected to
accelerate during the next few weeks
because of the terrorist attacks.
Alaska lawmakers, who already
were pushing for federal dollars to
subsidize a pipeline that stays within
their state for much of its route, now
are citing the threat to world energy
supplies as a new justification. Until
now, arguments over a route have
turned on economics, with the oil
companies that own the gas supply
arguing that the route sought by
Alaskans is simply not supportable.
They want no congressional dictates
on routing.
Even before the Sept. 11 attacks,
Senate Energy and Natural Resources
Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman,
D-N.M., described the development of
the natural gas pipeline as both an
"economic and national security
issue."
Now, ranking Republican Frank H.
Murkowski, R-Alaska, says the attacks
will bolster congressional support for
the project. "These attacks are evi-dence
to the American public that as
we increase our dependence on for-eign
sources, we abrogate our national
security responsibilities."
One possible route, commonly
referred to as the northern route,
would stretch 1,619 miles from
Prudhoe Bay under the Beaufort Sea,
come ashore in northern Canada and
extend up Mackenzie River valley to
Edmonton. The other route, com-monly
referred to as the southern or
highway route, would extend 1,982
miles from Prudhoe Bay south to
Fairbanks, Alaska, and then toward
Edmonton. This route would parallel
the Alaska Highway.
Northern route supporters, which
include the Canadian government, say
that it is the only economically viable
route. Alaska's Democratic governor
and all-Republican congressional dele-gation
support the southern route.
They say the pipeline's construction
would create jobs for Alaskan workers
and allow Alaskan communities to tap
into the gas supply.
Last week, Joe Handley, resources
minister for Canada's Northwest
Territories, told a business conference
in Yellowknife that Tuesday's attack
may have harmed prospects for the
northern route. "They may decide that
even though the Alaskan pipeline isn't
economically viable, they may decide
to go ahead with it anyway just to
maximize their self-sufficiency,"
Handley said, according to a Canadian
Broadcasting Company report.
Although Bingaman has vowed to
include language in his comprehen-sive
energy bill (S 597) that would
"streamline the regulatory approval
process" for construction of a natural
gas pipeline from Alaska, "he has
always been route-neutral,"
spokesman Bill Wicker said.
However, the chairman is a realist.
"If people put in provisions specifying
a route, so be it," Wicker said.
- Ted Monoson
continued from page 1
To tell us of key personnel changes,
please call (202) 887-8515, fax (202)
835-1635 or e-mail [email protected].
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2001 CQ Daily Monitor WWW.CQ.COM
continued from page 1
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
We do want to go to the Nutcracker if you can still get tix. Also, could you
have Trey send us the grocery delivery service website?
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Gifts for Trey
Thanks for the info. I just need simple, basic frames. No decorations or
anything. That way, they can go anywhere, and aren't specific to a decor,
theme, time of year, etc. So, painted wood or black resin probably are the
best. I could use 5x7" the most.
Trey is going to get Playstation 2 once they become available, so you may
want to find a game for the new machine. Also, since it has a DVD player
attached, he will need DVDs to play on it. I already got him Being John
Malkovich and the Grinch, but he has no others.
We are looking forward to your visit. Trey, Cameron and I are going to the
Nutcracker ballet on the 26th. Do you and Marianne want to go? I am sure
that Kay would love to watch Madison, and I would think that we still could
get tickets if you are interested. Let me know.
See you later.
Michelle
[email protected] (Cash, Brooks D.) on 11/28/2000 08:45:00 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Gifts for Trey
We're getting Dad the dustbuster or keychain (unless you guys already have)
and Gretchen the placemats/guest towels and Span/Eng dictionary
Marianne wants some clarification on what kind of picture frames
(wood/metal
(type) etc and coasters (whimsical, serious artsy, material) for your list.
I'm going to prob get Trey the Lyle CD and a playstation game. Maybe a Polo
shirt
Brooks
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 12:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Gifts for Trey
Would you let me know which you choose? I may need some of them as a
backup! Michelle
[email protected] (Cash, Brooks D.) on 10/23/2000 10:47:10 AM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Gifts for Trey
Thanks, that helps a lot. Looking forward to seeing you guys, too.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 10:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Gifts for Trey
Hi, Brooks.
He wants the newest Lyle Lovett album -- the soundtrack to Dr. T and the
Women. Also, he is getting a Playstation II from me for his birthday (they
don't come out until this week, so he doesn't have it yet), so you could
find him a game for the new system. He has said that he wants a new clock
radio, with AM/FM (I don't think he wants CD/tape player on it), with
battery backup -- Sony would be best. Also, he always wears short-sleeved
Polo shirts, size XL. He prefers basics, in solid colors such as white (he
never can have enough of those), navy, khaki, or light blue.
Let me know if you need any other suggestions.
We are looking forward to your visit, especially Cameron. He always is
talking about how Santa is going to bring presents for him and Madison!
Take care, and say "hi" to Marianne.
Michelle
[email protected] (Cash, Brooks D.) on 10/20/2000 09:08:25 AM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Gifts for Trey
Michelle,
Can you give me any ideas regarding birthday and x-mas presents for
the man
who has everything?
Hope all is well there.
Brooks
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Yes.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Well, I guess we could. since we needed to do it immediately, only Stepanie
can only do it immediately. Do you want me to change it, or, Stephanie,
since you've already changed it will it be already changed tomorrow so we
don't need to do anything. I'm so confused?!!!
Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate
03/28/2001 03:29 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: Ontario Power Generation
Tana,
Can we accomplish that by you initiating a change to their current trading
profile in Profile Manager ??
Regards,
tm
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Tana
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Sever, Stephanie; Lees, Lisa
Cc: Nettelton, Marcus; Moran, Tom; Guidroz, Walter
Subject: Ontario Power Generation
Per conv. a minute ago with Marcus, Christi Nicolay in the Regulatory Group
just checked and Ontario Power Generation does not have a FERC marketing
license. That leaves them to buying US power only (both east & west OK).
Please make this change immediately.
Thanks!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Stacey,
It looks like your missing paths revealed a quirk in our suppression of zero
paths. There were 4 paths initially entered as zero, then changed to
non-zero on a later date. The system did not correctly determine that the
zero path should no longer be suppressed.
We have fixed the 4 paths affected and have corrected the code so this won't
happen any more. Below is a screen print of the Nov 22 problem that is now
fixed.
Thanks, d.n.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
You're not going to believe this one! Did you hear the one about the 8-year old who rode a bike from Houston to Austin? No? There's no punch line. This is the truth. In the 2000 MS150, Evan Haas, 8 years of age, did the distance on a tandem, and is back for another go, but this year with Team Enron, on his own bike. Evan turned 9 on April 14, and is celebrating by doing the MS150 all over again!
Evan Haas
9 years old
Riding with his father, Ryan
Also along on "chaser" is Ryan's sister Madison, 7 years
Evan is already a celebrity
4th Place in the 2000 Velodrome All City Competition in the 10-12 year old category
3rd Place in the 2000 State Cyclocross Championships in the 10-14 year old category
Current record holder in the "Team Pursuit" - 4 person team with total combined ages of 37 (time 8:04 min). This team has issued a challenge to all of the velodromes in the nation, and none has answered with a comparable age level.
Watch for Evan, and your challenge will be to come in ahead of him. ARE YOU UP TO IT?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Forgot to attached the revised agreement. Here it is.
Stephanie Panus
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000
03:49 PM ---------------------------
Amber Ebow
02/11/2000 03:27 PM
To: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Kim Washington <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], "Bowden, Neinka S" <[email protected]>, "Angela
Washington" <[email protected]>, Shundea
Thrower<[email protected]>, Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina
Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shyril L
Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Albert Escamilla/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Powerful!!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000 03:23 PM
---------------------------
Julissa Marron@ENRON
02/11/2000 03:21 PM
To: Marilyn Rivera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Marron
<[email protected]>, Tiffany La Dang
<[email protected]>, "Linda Stevens" <[email protected]>, Faye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Barclay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynette
Malone/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Powerful!!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Julissa Marron/Corp/Enron on 02/11/2000
03:19 PM ---------------------------
Subject: Powerful!!!!
- ATT00032.jpg
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Mary,
I have broken out June and July like you asked from Annette's reporting and
the numbers are below.
Month Total Consumption
June 429950
July 213384
Thank you,
Michael
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael J McClellan/TMG/CSC on
09/14/2001 10:25 AM ---------------------------
Michael J McClellan/CEG/CSC on 09/12/2001 01:42:38 PM
Sent by: Michael J McClellan/TMG/CSC
To: "Ring, Richard" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Clean Choice Reports and Fetzer report for July (Document
link: Michael J McClellan)
The total consumption for July was 642934.
Thanks,
Michael
"Ring, Richard" <[email protected]> on 09/12/2001 10:29:17 AM
To: Michael J McClellan/TMG/CSC@CSC
cc:
Subject: RE: Clean Choice Reports and Fetzer report for July
Michael,
Are you going to resubmit the report(s) with the correct July 2001
information? The specific information that I am looking for is accurate
information for "Reportable Consumption" and "Total Consumption", both
in kWh's.
Thanks for your assistance.
Regards,
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Clean Choice Reports and Fetzer report for July
Richard,
Afer checking the last report was for two months June and July. The
4,407
was not kWh but is Dollars instead. Sorry for the confusion.
Regards,
Michael
[email protected] on 08/17/2001 02:25:33 PM
To: Michael J McClellan/TMG/CSC@CSC
cc:
Subject: Re: Clean Choice Reports and Fetzer report for July
Michael,
It looks like there may be some problem with the Fetzer Vineyards
Greenpower Consumption Report. You may want to review the report and
determine what is wrong. Reportable Consumption is 352,536 kWh's and
Total
Consumption is 4,407 kWh's. Total Consumption should be more than
Reportable Consumption.
Also there is no consumption for the month of June 2001.
I can be reached at 713.853.3561.
Regards,
Richard
[email protected]@csc.com on 08/15/2001 04:30:28 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Clean Choice Reports and Fetzer report for July
Attached please find the monthly reports for July. I will be taking
over
processing the report for Annette Tafallo. If you have any questions
please do not hesitate to call.
(See attached file: Residential2001.xls)(See attached file:
SMALLC&I2001.xls)(See attached file: FETZERCAPS2001.xls)
Thank you,
Michael
713-632-8711
(See attached file: Residential2001.xls)
(See attached file: SMALLC&I2001.xls)
(See attached file: FETZERCAPS2001.xls)
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and
delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
(Embedded image moved to file: pic07441.pcx) - Residential2001.xls
(See attached file: SMALLC&I2001.xls)
(See attached file: FETZERCAPS2001.xls)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Can you please send me a copy of the NGPL transportation deal structure?
Thank you.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
As discussed. Gary give me a call before you call Gavin.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 06/09/2000
10:27 AM ---------------------------
"gavin kosviner" <[email protected]> on 06/06/2000 09:26:42 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Gavin's resume
John,
Hope you are well.
Following our conversation yesterday, I have sent my resume attached as a
word file.
Regards,
Gavin
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
- gk_resume0400.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.