hypothesis
stringclasses
80 values
target
stringclasses
40 values
stance
int64
-1
1
premise
stringlengths
19
223
validated_stance
int64
-1
1
validation_source
stringclasses
1 value
entailment
int64
0
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
The individual freedom of expression is essential to the well-being of society
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
freedom can be restricted for reasons of "sovereignty and integrity
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
The people should not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
when a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
the circumstances of wartime permit greater restrictions on free speech than would be allowable during peacetime
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
the freely expressed word can be a direct threat to other human rights
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
The right to freedom of speech and expression may be limited when conflicting with other rights
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
the expression of dissent or subversive views should be tolerated
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
Speech can be justifiably suppressed in order to prevent harm from a clear and direct threat
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
there must be no constraints on the free flow of information and ideas
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
democracy will not be true to its essential ideal if those in power are able to manipulate the electorate by withholding information and stifling criticism
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
there ought to exist the fullest liberty of professing and discussing, as a matter of ethical conviction, any doctrine, however immoral it may be considered
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
some forms of expression can be legitimately prohibited by law because they are very offensive
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
it is necessary to prevent the use of information resources and technologies for criminal and terrorist purposes
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
the more freely information flows, the stronger societies become
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
No human right is more basic than freedom of expression
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
Clear and present danger is posed by discriminatory speech and the growth of e-hate
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
liberty of expression 'is not absolute
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
Punishment of dangerous or offensive writings is necessary for the preservation of peace and good order
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
Reasonable restrictions upon free speech serve public order
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
The freedom of speech and of the press does not confer an absolute right to express without any responsibility
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
Reasonable restrictions can be imposed on the freedom of speech and expression, in the interest of the security of the State
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
All the utterances intended to endanger the security of the State may be restrained in the interest of the security of the State
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
Freedom of speech does not allow a person to contempt the courts
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
Freedom of speech and expression can not be an excuse for distribution of indecent and immoral content
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
Reasonable restrictions on freedom of expression can be imposed in the interest of public order
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
1
censorship violates multiple Basic Human Rights
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
one can not tolerate free speech concerning drugs
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
the right to freedom of speech can be subjected to limitations such as hate speech
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
Without restrictions, total freedom of speech would allow freedom to slander
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes passing the American Jobs Act
the American Jobs Act
1
unemployment increases the more the government intervenes into the economy to try to improve the conditions of those without jobs
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes passing the American Jobs Act
the American Jobs Act
1
The American Jobs Act gives more tax breaks, thus contributing more to the federal deficit
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
-1
vouchers and other forms of publicly funded private school choice are necessary to give families an opportunity to enroll their children in more effective private schools
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
-1
a voucher system for public education would make public schools compete with one another thus making them more accountable and efficient
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
public education would be destroyed by tuition vouchers
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
the tuition voucher proposal would undermine public education
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
Vouchers function to increase racial and economic discrimination in schools
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
since approximately four out of five US private schools are religious, voucher and charter systems violate the Constitution
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
allowing families the option of both public and private schools undermines the public education system
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
-1
School voucher and education tax credit systems incentivize schools to increase accountability and school performance
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
-1
the competition spurred by vouchers and education tax credits increases the quality of both eligible private schools and local public schools
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
-1
Both private and public schools are improving through the use of vouchers
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
-1
vouchers improve academic outcomes at public schools
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
-1
Vouchers reduce racial segregation
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
-1
Vouchers deliver better services to special education students
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
School vouchers would erode educational standards and reduce funding
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
a voucher system would weaken public schools
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
granting government money, even indirectly, to private and religious schools will inevitably lead to increased governmental control over non-government education
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
-1
Competition for students (and the education dollars that come with them) creates a catalyst for schools to create innovative programs
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
-1
School choice programs would allow poor students to opt out of bad schools and acquire a better education
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
vouchers could result in nothing more than a cash-handout for many middle-class and wealthy families already sending their kids to private schools
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
with federal school vouchers inevitably come further central government regulation and loss of local control over education
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes funding education using a voucher scheme
funding education using a voucher scheme
1
Education vouchers would undermine public schools
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes abolishing congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
1
Earmarks are Good for American Democracy
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes abolishing congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
1
In an already flawed system, earmarks can at least allow residents of Congressional districts to have a greater role in allocating federal funds
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes abolishing congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
1
directing money to particular purposes is a core constitutional function of Congress
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes abolishing congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
-1
Congressmen tend to distribute specialized benefits at a great cost and ignore the particular costs the legislation bears upon the taxpayers
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
a nuclear nation might be hijacked by a despot or other person or persons who might use nuclear weapons without sane regard for the consequences
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
Having more nuclear nuclear-weapon states will reduce security for all
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
reliance on nuclear weapons for deterrence is becoming increasingly hazardous and decreasingly effective
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
nuclear weapons had become a source of extreme risk
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
Nuclear proliferation increases the chance of inter-state nuclear conflict
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
Nuclear proliferation increases the chances of nuclear material falling into the hands of non-state groups
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
new nuclear states often lack adequate organizational controls over their new weapons
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
public opinion is overwhelmingly opposed to nuclearization
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
more countries with nuclear weapons may increase the possibility of nuclear warfare
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
most states are not in a position to safely guard against nuclear use
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
Nuclear weapons give nations the potential to not only destroy their enemies but humanity itself
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
Extreme danger is intrinsic to nuclear war and the possession of nuclear weapons
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
with nuclear weapons more widely available, deterrence is decreasingly effective and increasingly hazardous
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text does not believe all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
1
if we hope to escape self-destruction, then nuclear weapons should have no place in our collective conscience, and no role in our security
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
High-rise blocks became notorious for crime and poverty
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
High-rise buildings cast a significant shadow over nearby buildings, reducing solar energy harvesting
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
High-rise buildings also cast shadows over public spaces, reducing their amenity value
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
High-rise structures also pose serious challenges to firefighters during emergencies
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
Tower Blocks grew a reputation for being undesirable low cost housing
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
many tower blocks saw rising crime levels
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
Many tower blocks experience structural decay
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
The overbearing design of the tower blocks makes them fearsome and unsociable
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
Tower blocks may be inherently more prone to casualties from a fire
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
people living on higher floors cannot escape fires easily and the fire brigade cannot reach the higher floors quickly
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
consumers prefer lower density neighborhoods
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
Increased population density is linked with increased aggression
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
increased population density encourages crime and anti-social behavior
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes building high rises for housing
housing
1
human beings, while social animals, need significant amounts of social space or they become agitated and aggressive
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
it is neither necessary nor desirable to create an offence of religious insult
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
-1
The law against blasphemy complements laws against racial discrimination and incitement to violence
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
the state has no legitimate interest in protecting any or all religions from views distasteful to them
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
It is not the business of government in our nation to suppress real or imagined attacks upon a particular religious doctrine
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
there is no place for the offence of blasphemous libel in a society which respects freedom of speech
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
Anti-blasphemy and religious defamation laws are used to imprison journalists, students and other peaceful political dissidents
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
The 'defamation of religions' concept is used to justify censorship
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
Blasphemy laws can be used to victimize non-members of, and dissident members of, the state religion
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
the offence of blasphemy is a dead letter
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
the common-law offence of blasphemous libel serves no useful purpose in modern law
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
freedom of speech cannot be compromised
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
1
It's better to publish too much than not to have freedom
1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
0
The author of this text opposes criminalizing blasphemy
blasphemy
-1
freedom of speech ends when sacred values are offended
-1
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
1