chunk_id
stringlengths 3
9
| chunk
stringlengths 1
100
|
---|---|
9852_182 | determine the effectiveness of the security features on the Birds of Canada and Canadian Journey |
9852_183 | series banknotes. The research found that participants correctly identified 84% of counterfeit |
9852_184 | banknotes based only on fluorescence features, 83% based only on microprinting and fine line |
9852_185 | features, and 80% based only on portrait features. Genuine banknotes were correctly identified 88%, |
9852_186 | 97%, and 89% of the time, respectively. The optical security device was the most effective security |
9852_187 | feature, used to correctly identify 98% of counterfeit banknotes and 95% of genuine banknotes. |
9852_188 | Detecting counterfeits using only touch was 74% effective for the $10 banknote and 82% effective |
9852_189 | for the $20 banknote. Using only vision, counterfeit detection was 92% effective for the $10 |
9852_190 | banknote and 86% effective for the $20 banknote. Using both improved performance to 94% for both |
9852_191 | banknotes. |
9852_192 | The general public correctly identified 72% of counterfeit banknotes, 80% of genuine $10 banknotes |
9852_193 | and 89% of genuine $20 banknotes. Commercial cash handlers, such as retail cashiers, correctly |
9852_194 | identified 86% of counterfeit banknotes, 89% of genuine $10 banknotes and 94% of genuine $20 |
9852_195 | banknotes. Bank tellers correctly identified 89% of counterfeit banknotes, 91% of genuine $10 |
9852_196 | banknotes and 95% of genuine $20 banknotes. All groups performed better with high-quality notes |
9852_197 | (that is, those that were clean and undamaged) with the exception that the general public |
9852_198 | misidentified many high-quality genuine $10 banknotes as counterfeit, which was attributed to the |
9852_199 | public's suspicion of new banknotes. |
9852_200 | The participants performed better at identifying counterfeit Birds of Canada banknotes than |
9852_201 | identifying counterfeit Canadian Journey banknotes. |
9852_202 | Reception |
9852_203 | A report by The Canadian Press stated that residents of Lunenburg were displeased with the design |
9852_204 | of the $100 banknote, as the reverse of the same denomination in the Scenes of Canada series |
9852_205 | featured a vignette of the fishing town. Many younger Canadians were unfamiliar with the Red |
9852_206 | Ensign, and thought the flag flown atop the buildings on the $5 and $10 banknote was the flag of |
9852_207 | the United States, precipitating media coverage known as the "flag flap". |
9852_208 | Currency collectors stated that the optical security device was not aesthetically pleasing, and |
9852_209 | that its placement and appearance were poor. Some compared it to the Australian commemorative $10 |
9852_210 | note issued in 1988, which had a reflective holographic badge featuring James Cook, as an example |
9852_211 | of a more aesthetically pleasing design. |
9852_212 | Collecting |
9852_213 | The Bank of Canada printed uncut sheets of the $5 banknotes with serial numbers between 6,000,000 |
9852_214 | and 6,939,999 and prefix ANU. Some of these were released for sale to collectors in 2002 when the |
9852_215 | Bank of Canada also issued the Lasting Impressions collectors set. This set contained two |
9852_216 | uncirculated $5 banknotes, one from this series and the other from the Canadian Journey Series, |
9852_217 | with matching serial numbers. The banknotes were in an embossed folder also containing an |
9852_218 | information booklet with the history of the denomination and the features of each banknote. A |
9852_219 | similar set for $10 banknotes had been released in 2001. |
9852_220 | Legacy |
9852_221 | A study commissioned by the Bank of Canada in 1994 stated that about 8,000 blind Canadians do not |
9852_222 | benefit from the large numerals or distinct colouration of the banknotes. In 1990, the Bank of |
9852_223 | Canada, via the Canadian National Institute for the Blind, had begun distributing to these |
9852_224 | individuals a free electronic device capable of determining the denomination of a banknote by |
9852_225 | reading the vertical bars adjacent to the serial number. Each device cost the Bank of Canada about |
9852_226 | , and 50–60 devices were requested every month, mostly from elderly individuals who used the device |
9852_227 | at home. |
9852_228 | Withdrawing the $1 banknote of earlier series and discontinuing printing of the $2 banknotes |
9852_229 | increased consumer use of the loonie and toonie. This decreased the costs of producing money and |
9852_230 | decreased the operational costs for some businesses, such as the Toronto Transit Commission, which |
9852_231 | estimated it would save annually by not having to "unfold, sort, and count $1 bills". |
9852_232 | The appearance of high-quality counterfeit $100 banknotes in 2001 from Windsor to Montreal resulted |
9852_233 | in about 10% of retailers to post signs that they would refuse to accept $100 banknotes in a cash |
9852_234 | transaction. |
9852_235 | Notes
References
External links |
9852_236 | Bank of Canada to Stop Issuing $1000 Note at the Collections Canada archive of the Bank of Canada |
9852_237 | website |
9852_238 | Banknotes of Canada
1986 in Canada |
9853_0 | The Nassau Interim Finance Authority is a New York State public-benefit corporation created to |
9853_1 | assist Nassau County, a suburban county adjacent to the city of New York on Long Island, emerge |
9853_2 | from a financial and debt crisis that began in the late 1990s. As of the start of 2022, NIFA, as it |
9853_3 | is known, was still in place and still supervising Nassau's finances under a control period that |
9853_4 | resumed in 2011 after a three-year hiatus. |
9853_5 | Organization |
9853_6 | NIFA is guided by a seven-member board appointed by the Governor of New York, with one member |
9853_7 | recommended by the Senate Majority Leader, one by the Assembly Speaker, and one by the State |
9853_8 | Comptroller. Its management team is headed by Evan Cohen, who serves as executive director. |
9853_9 | According to its 2020 annual report, NIFA had G&A expenses in 2020 of $1.834 million. It listed a |
9853_10 | staff of five persons. |
9853_11 | History |
9853_12 | Though the U.S. federal government was in surplus at the end of the Clinton administration, the |
9853_13 | Republican Party-led Nassau County government faced possible insolvency by 2000. The signs of the |
9853_14 | crisis began in 1999 and led that year to the Democratic Party taking control of the county |
9853_15 | legislature, in a previously solid Republican county. Among the many reasons cited for the |
9853_16 | situation the county found itself in were excessive union contracts to attract county government |
9853_17 | worker support for the Republican Party; a refusal by the Republican county executive Thomas |
9853_18 | Gulotta to raise taxes; and an increase in borrowing to close the gap, particularly for the purpose |
9853_19 | of paying an increasing number of property assessment appeals coming out of an assessment system |
9853_20 | that relied on outdated data. |
9853_21 | NIFA and the Gulotta administration |
9853_22 | Gulotta, a Republican, had proposed a tax increase in the early 1990s, and was almost defeated by |
9853_23 | North Hempstead Supervisor Benjamin Zwirn in 1993. Gulotta resisted further tax increases for the |
9853_24 | rest of his time in office, and was re-elected in 1997. Two years later, the county's finances |
9853_25 | began to implode. The first chairman of NIFA, Frank Zarb, said in a retrospective that bankruptcy |
9853_26 | was a "real possibility." In June 2000, Republican Governor George Pataki signed the legislation |
9853_27 | creating NIFA. As part of the introduction of NIFA, the state made payments to Nassau County of |
9853_28 | $105 million over five years. |
9853_29 | NIFA and the Suozzi administration |
9853_30 | Gulotta did not stand for re-election in 2001. When Nassau County's Conservative Party endorsed |
9853_31 | money market specialist Bruce Bent as its candidate, the Republicans endorsed Bent as well. Bent |
9853_32 | was defeated by then Glen Cove Mayor Thomas Suozzi. The county's financial situation had led the |
9853_33 | outgoing Gulotta administration to implement a 9.1% property tax increase in the 2002 budget, and |
9853_34 | Suozzi's first budget had a property tax increase of almost 20%. His final budget before he was |
9853_35 | defeated for re-election in 2009, by County Legislator Ed Mangano, had a 3.9% increase. There were |
9853_36 | no other county property tax increases in Suozzi's two terms though the total increased taxes |
9853_37 | levied by Suozzi during his tenure became a campaign issue during his successful run for Congress |
9853_38 | in 2016. Suozzi dealt with a NIFA control board for much of his eight years in office, though the |
9853_39 | control period ended in 2008. But NIFA remained in existence even after the end of the control |
9853_40 | period and continued to monitor county finances. |
9853_41 | NIFA and the Mangano administration |
9853_42 | After Mangano was sworn in as county executive in 2010 following his victory over Suozzi, he and |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.