chunk_id
stringlengths 3
9
| chunk
stringlengths 1
100
|
---|---|
9852_182
|
determine the effectiveness of the security features on the Birds of Canada and Canadian Journey
|
9852_183
|
series banknotes. The research found that participants correctly identified 84% of counterfeit
|
9852_184
|
banknotes based only on fluorescence features, 83% based only on microprinting and fine line
|
9852_185
|
features, and 80% based only on portrait features. Genuine banknotes were correctly identified 88%,
|
9852_186
|
97%, and 89% of the time, respectively. The optical security device was the most effective security
|
9852_187
|
feature, used to correctly identify 98% of counterfeit banknotes and 95% of genuine banknotes.
|
9852_188
|
Detecting counterfeits using only touch was 74% effective for the $10 banknote and 82% effective
|
9852_189
|
for the $20 banknote. Using only vision, counterfeit detection was 92% effective for the $10
|
9852_190
|
banknote and 86% effective for the $20 banknote. Using both improved performance to 94% for both
|
9852_191
|
banknotes.
|
9852_192
|
The general public correctly identified 72% of counterfeit banknotes, 80% of genuine $10 banknotes
|
9852_193
|
and 89% of genuine $20 banknotes. Commercial cash handlers, such as retail cashiers, correctly
|
9852_194
|
identified 86% of counterfeit banknotes, 89% of genuine $10 banknotes and 94% of genuine $20
|
9852_195
|
banknotes. Bank tellers correctly identified 89% of counterfeit banknotes, 91% of genuine $10
|
9852_196
|
banknotes and 95% of genuine $20 banknotes. All groups performed better with high-quality notes
|
9852_197
|
(that is, those that were clean and undamaged) with the exception that the general public
|
9852_198
|
misidentified many high-quality genuine $10 banknotes as counterfeit, which was attributed to the
|
9852_199
|
public's suspicion of new banknotes.
|
9852_200
|
The participants performed better at identifying counterfeit Birds of Canada banknotes than
|
9852_201
|
identifying counterfeit Canadian Journey banknotes.
|
9852_202
|
Reception
|
9852_203
|
A report by The Canadian Press stated that residents of Lunenburg were displeased with the design
|
9852_204
|
of the $100 banknote, as the reverse of the same denomination in the Scenes of Canada series
|
9852_205
|
featured a vignette of the fishing town. Many younger Canadians were unfamiliar with the Red
|
9852_206
|
Ensign, and thought the flag flown atop the buildings on the $5 and $10 banknote was the flag of
|
9852_207
|
the United States, precipitating media coverage known as the "flag flap".
|
9852_208
|
Currency collectors stated that the optical security device was not aesthetically pleasing, and
|
9852_209
|
that its placement and appearance were poor. Some compared it to the Australian commemorative $10
|
9852_210
|
note issued in 1988, which had a reflective holographic badge featuring James Cook, as an example
|
9852_211
|
of a more aesthetically pleasing design.
|
9852_212
|
Collecting
|
9852_213
|
The Bank of Canada printed uncut sheets of the $5 banknotes with serial numbers between 6,000,000
|
9852_214
|
and 6,939,999 and prefix ANU. Some of these were released for sale to collectors in 2002 when the
|
9852_215
|
Bank of Canada also issued the Lasting Impressions collectors set. This set contained two
|
9852_216
|
uncirculated $5 banknotes, one from this series and the other from the Canadian Journey Series,
|
9852_217
|
with matching serial numbers. The banknotes were in an embossed folder also containing an
|
9852_218
|
information booklet with the history of the denomination and the features of each banknote. A
|
9852_219
|
similar set for $10 banknotes had been released in 2001.
|
9852_220
|
Legacy
|
9852_221
|
A study commissioned by the Bank of Canada in 1994 stated that about 8,000 blind Canadians do not
|
9852_222
|
benefit from the large numerals or distinct colouration of the banknotes. In 1990, the Bank of
|
9852_223
|
Canada, via the Canadian National Institute for the Blind, had begun distributing to these
|
9852_224
|
individuals a free electronic device capable of determining the denomination of a banknote by
|
9852_225
|
reading the vertical bars adjacent to the serial number. Each device cost the Bank of Canada about
|
9852_226
|
, and 50–60 devices were requested every month, mostly from elderly individuals who used the device
|
9852_227
|
at home.
|
9852_228
|
Withdrawing the $1 banknote of earlier series and discontinuing printing of the $2 banknotes
|
9852_229
|
increased consumer use of the loonie and toonie. This decreased the costs of producing money and
|
9852_230
|
decreased the operational costs for some businesses, such as the Toronto Transit Commission, which
|
9852_231
|
estimated it would save annually by not having to "unfold, sort, and count $1 bills".
|
9852_232
|
The appearance of high-quality counterfeit $100 banknotes in 2001 from Windsor to Montreal resulted
|
9852_233
|
in about 10% of retailers to post signs that they would refuse to accept $100 banknotes in a cash
|
9852_234
|
transaction.
|
9852_235
|
Notes
References
External links
|
9852_236
|
Bank of Canada to Stop Issuing $1000 Note at the Collections Canada archive of the Bank of Canada
|
9852_237
|
website
|
9852_238
|
Banknotes of Canada
1986 in Canada
|
9853_0
|
The Nassau Interim Finance Authority is a New York State public-benefit corporation created to
|
9853_1
|
assist Nassau County, a suburban county adjacent to the city of New York on Long Island, emerge
|
9853_2
|
from a financial and debt crisis that began in the late 1990s. As of the start of 2022, NIFA, as it
|
9853_3
|
is known, was still in place and still supervising Nassau's finances under a control period that
|
9853_4
|
resumed in 2011 after a three-year hiatus.
|
9853_5
|
Organization
|
9853_6
|
NIFA is guided by a seven-member board appointed by the Governor of New York, with one member
|
9853_7
|
recommended by the Senate Majority Leader, one by the Assembly Speaker, and one by the State
|
9853_8
|
Comptroller. Its management team is headed by Evan Cohen, who serves as executive director.
|
9853_9
|
According to its 2020 annual report, NIFA had G&A expenses in 2020 of $1.834 million. It listed a
|
9853_10
|
staff of five persons.
|
9853_11
|
History
|
9853_12
|
Though the U.S. federal government was in surplus at the end of the Clinton administration, the
|
9853_13
|
Republican Party-led Nassau County government faced possible insolvency by 2000. The signs of the
|
9853_14
|
crisis began in 1999 and led that year to the Democratic Party taking control of the county
|
9853_15
|
legislature, in a previously solid Republican county. Among the many reasons cited for the
|
9853_16
|
situation the county found itself in were excessive union contracts to attract county government
|
9853_17
|
worker support for the Republican Party; a refusal by the Republican county executive Thomas
|
9853_18
|
Gulotta to raise taxes; and an increase in borrowing to close the gap, particularly for the purpose
|
9853_19
|
of paying an increasing number of property assessment appeals coming out of an assessment system
|
9853_20
|
that relied on outdated data.
|
9853_21
|
NIFA and the Gulotta administration
|
9853_22
|
Gulotta, a Republican, had proposed a tax increase in the early 1990s, and was almost defeated by
|
9853_23
|
North Hempstead Supervisor Benjamin Zwirn in 1993. Gulotta resisted further tax increases for the
|
9853_24
|
rest of his time in office, and was re-elected in 1997. Two years later, the county's finances
|
9853_25
|
began to implode. The first chairman of NIFA, Frank Zarb, said in a retrospective that bankruptcy
|
9853_26
|
was a "real possibility." In June 2000, Republican Governor George Pataki signed the legislation
|
9853_27
|
creating NIFA. As part of the introduction of NIFA, the state made payments to Nassau County of
|
9853_28
|
$105 million over five years.
|
9853_29
|
NIFA and the Suozzi administration
|
9853_30
|
Gulotta did not stand for re-election in 2001. When Nassau County's Conservative Party endorsed
|
9853_31
|
money market specialist Bruce Bent as its candidate, the Republicans endorsed Bent as well. Bent
|
9853_32
|
was defeated by then Glen Cove Mayor Thomas Suozzi. The county's financial situation had led the
|
9853_33
|
outgoing Gulotta administration to implement a 9.1% property tax increase in the 2002 budget, and
|
9853_34
|
Suozzi's first budget had a property tax increase of almost 20%. His final budget before he was
|
9853_35
|
defeated for re-election in 2009, by County Legislator Ed Mangano, had a 3.9% increase. There were
|
9853_36
|
no other county property tax increases in Suozzi's two terms though the total increased taxes
|
9853_37
|
levied by Suozzi during his tenure became a campaign issue during his successful run for Congress
|
9853_38
|
in 2016. Suozzi dealt with a NIFA control board for much of his eight years in office, though the
|
9853_39
|
control period ended in 2008. But NIFA remained in existence even after the end of the control
|
9853_40
|
period and continued to monitor county finances.
|
9853_41
|
NIFA and the Mangano administration
|
9853_42
|
After Mangano was sworn in as county executive in 2010 following his victory over Suozzi, he and
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.