Chapter
stringclasses
18 values
sentence_range
stringlengths
3
9
Text
stringlengths
7
7.34k
9
2739-2742
Solution mFe = 55 85, u = 9 27 × 10–26 kg Nuclear density = mass volume = 26 15 3 9 27 10 1 56 (4 /3)(1
9
2740-2743
85, u = 9 27 × 10–26 kg Nuclear density = mass volume = 26 15 3 9 27 10 1 56 (4 /3)(1 2 10 ) − − × × π × = 2
9
2741-2744
27 × 10–26 kg Nuclear density = mass volume = 26 15 3 9 27 10 1 56 (4 /3)(1 2 10 ) − − × × π × = 2 29 × 1017 kg m–3 The density of matter in neutron stars (an astrophysical object) is comparable to this density
9
2742-2745
27 10 1 56 (4 /3)(1 2 10 ) − − × × π × = 2 29 × 1017 kg m–3 The density of matter in neutron stars (an astrophysical object) is comparable to this density This shows that matter in these objects has been compressed to such an extent that they resemble a big nucleus
9
2743-2746
2 10 ) − − × × π × = 2 29 × 1017 kg m–3 The density of matter in neutron stars (an astrophysical object) is comparable to this density This shows that matter in these objects has been compressed to such an extent that they resemble a big nucleus 13
9
2744-2747
29 × 1017 kg m–3 The density of matter in neutron stars (an astrophysical object) is comparable to this density This shows that matter in these objects has been compressed to such an extent that they resemble a big nucleus 13 4 MASS-ENERGY AND NUCLEAR BINDING ENERGY 13
9
2745-2748
This shows that matter in these objects has been compressed to such an extent that they resemble a big nucleus 13 4 MASS-ENERGY AND NUCLEAR BINDING ENERGY 13 4
9
2746-2749
13 4 MASS-ENERGY AND NUCLEAR BINDING ENERGY 13 4 1 Mass – Energy Einstein showed from his theory of special relativity that it is necessary to treat mass as another form of energy
9
2747-2750
4 MASS-ENERGY AND NUCLEAR BINDING ENERGY 13 4 1 Mass – Energy Einstein showed from his theory of special relativity that it is necessary to treat mass as another form of energy Before the advent of this theory of special relativity it was presumed that mass and energy were conserved separately in a reaction
9
2748-2751
4 1 Mass – Energy Einstein showed from his theory of special relativity that it is necessary to treat mass as another form of energy Before the advent of this theory of special relativity it was presumed that mass and energy were conserved separately in a reaction However, Einstein showed that mass is another form of energy and one can convert mass-energy into other forms of energy, say kinetic energy and vice-versa
9
2749-2752
1 Mass – Energy Einstein showed from his theory of special relativity that it is necessary to treat mass as another form of energy Before the advent of this theory of special relativity it was presumed that mass and energy were conserved separately in a reaction However, Einstein showed that mass is another form of energy and one can convert mass-energy into other forms of energy, say kinetic energy and vice-versa Einstein gave the famous mass-energy equivalence relation E = mc 2 (13
9
2750-2753
Before the advent of this theory of special relativity it was presumed that mass and energy were conserved separately in a reaction However, Einstein showed that mass is another form of energy and one can convert mass-energy into other forms of energy, say kinetic energy and vice-versa Einstein gave the famous mass-energy equivalence relation E = mc 2 (13 6) Here the energy equivalent of mass m is related by the above equation and c is the velocity of light in vacuum and is approximately equal to 3×108 m s–1
9
2751-2754
However, Einstein showed that mass is another form of energy and one can convert mass-energy into other forms of energy, say kinetic energy and vice-versa Einstein gave the famous mass-energy equivalence relation E = mc 2 (13 6) Here the energy equivalent of mass m is related by the above equation and c is the velocity of light in vacuum and is approximately equal to 3×108 m s–1 Example 13
9
2752-2755
Einstein gave the famous mass-energy equivalence relation E = mc 2 (13 6) Here the energy equivalent of mass m is related by the above equation and c is the velocity of light in vacuum and is approximately equal to 3×108 m s–1 Example 13 2 Calculate the energy equivalent of 1 g of substance
9
2753-2756
6) Here the energy equivalent of mass m is related by the above equation and c is the velocity of light in vacuum and is approximately equal to 3×108 m s–1 Example 13 2 Calculate the energy equivalent of 1 g of substance Solution Energy, E = 10–3 × ( 3 × 108)2 J E = 10–3 × 9 × 1016 = 9 × 1013 J Thus, if one gram of matter is converted to energy, there is a release of enormous amount of energy
9
2754-2757
Example 13 2 Calculate the energy equivalent of 1 g of substance Solution Energy, E = 10–3 × ( 3 × 108)2 J E = 10–3 × 9 × 1016 = 9 × 1013 J Thus, if one gram of matter is converted to energy, there is a release of enormous amount of energy Experimental verification of the Einstein’s mass-energy relation has been achieved in the study of nuclear reactions amongst nucleons, nuclei, electrons and other more recently discovered particles
9
2755-2758
2 Calculate the energy equivalent of 1 g of substance Solution Energy, E = 10–3 × ( 3 × 108)2 J E = 10–3 × 9 × 1016 = 9 × 1013 J Thus, if one gram of matter is converted to energy, there is a release of enormous amount of energy Experimental verification of the Einstein’s mass-energy relation has been achieved in the study of nuclear reactions amongst nucleons, nuclei, electrons and other more recently discovered particles In a reaction the conservation law of energy states that the initial energy and the final energy are equal provided the energy associated with mass is also included
9
2756-2759
Solution Energy, E = 10–3 × ( 3 × 108)2 J E = 10–3 × 9 × 1016 = 9 × 1013 J Thus, if one gram of matter is converted to energy, there is a release of enormous amount of energy Experimental verification of the Einstein’s mass-energy relation has been achieved in the study of nuclear reactions amongst nucleons, nuclei, electrons and other more recently discovered particles In a reaction the conservation law of energy states that the initial energy and the final energy are equal provided the energy associated with mass is also included This concept is important in understanding nuclear masses and the interaction of nuclei with one another
9
2757-2760
Experimental verification of the Einstein’s mass-energy relation has been achieved in the study of nuclear reactions amongst nucleons, nuclei, electrons and other more recently discovered particles In a reaction the conservation law of energy states that the initial energy and the final energy are equal provided the energy associated with mass is also included This concept is important in understanding nuclear masses and the interaction of nuclei with one another They form the subject matter of the next few sections
9
2758-2761
In a reaction the conservation law of energy states that the initial energy and the final energy are equal provided the energy associated with mass is also included This concept is important in understanding nuclear masses and the interaction of nuclei with one another They form the subject matter of the next few sections 13
9
2759-2762
This concept is important in understanding nuclear masses and the interaction of nuclei with one another They form the subject matter of the next few sections 13 4
9
2760-2763
They form the subject matter of the next few sections 13 4 2 Nuclear binding energy In Section 13
9
2761-2764
13 4 2 Nuclear binding energy In Section 13 2 we have seen that the nucleus is made up of neutrons and protons
9
2762-2765
4 2 Nuclear binding energy In Section 13 2 we have seen that the nucleus is made up of neutrons and protons Therefore it may be expected that the mass of the nucleus is equal to the total mass of its individual protons and neutrons
9
2763-2766
2 Nuclear binding energy In Section 13 2 we have seen that the nucleus is made up of neutrons and protons Therefore it may be expected that the mass of the nucleus is equal to the total mass of its individual protons and neutrons However, EXAMPLE 13
9
2764-2767
2 we have seen that the nucleus is made up of neutrons and protons Therefore it may be expected that the mass of the nucleus is equal to the total mass of its individual protons and neutrons However, EXAMPLE 13 1 Rationalised 2023-24 311 Nuclei EXAMPLE 13
9
2765-2768
Therefore it may be expected that the mass of the nucleus is equal to the total mass of its individual protons and neutrons However, EXAMPLE 13 1 Rationalised 2023-24 311 Nuclei EXAMPLE 13 3 the nuclear mass M is found to be always less than this
9
2766-2769
However, EXAMPLE 13 1 Rationalised 2023-24 311 Nuclei EXAMPLE 13 3 the nuclear mass M is found to be always less than this For example, let us consider 16 8 O ; a nucleus which has 8 neutrons and 8 protons
9
2767-2770
1 Rationalised 2023-24 311 Nuclei EXAMPLE 13 3 the nuclear mass M is found to be always less than this For example, let us consider 16 8 O ; a nucleus which has 8 neutrons and 8 protons We have Mass of 8 neutrons = 8 × 1
9
2768-2771
3 the nuclear mass M is found to be always less than this For example, let us consider 16 8 O ; a nucleus which has 8 neutrons and 8 protons We have Mass of 8 neutrons = 8 × 1 00866 u Mass of 8 protons = 8 × 1
9
2769-2772
For example, let us consider 16 8 O ; a nucleus which has 8 neutrons and 8 protons We have Mass of 8 neutrons = 8 × 1 00866 u Mass of 8 protons = 8 × 1 00727 u Mass of 8 electrons = 8 × 0
9
2770-2773
We have Mass of 8 neutrons = 8 × 1 00866 u Mass of 8 protons = 8 × 1 00727 u Mass of 8 electrons = 8 × 0 00055 u Therefore the expected mass of 16 = 8 × 2
9
2771-2774
00866 u Mass of 8 protons = 8 × 1 00727 u Mass of 8 electrons = 8 × 0 00055 u Therefore the expected mass of 16 = 8 × 2 01593 u = 16
9
2772-2775
00727 u Mass of 8 electrons = 8 × 0 00055 u Therefore the expected mass of 16 = 8 × 2 01593 u = 16 12744 u
9
2773-2776
00055 u Therefore the expected mass of 16 = 8 × 2 01593 u = 16 12744 u 8 O nucleus The atomic mass of 16 8 O found from mass spectroscopy experiments is seen to be 15
9
2774-2777
01593 u = 16 12744 u 8 O nucleus The atomic mass of 16 8 O found from mass spectroscopy experiments is seen to be 15 99493 u
9
2775-2778
12744 u 8 O nucleus The atomic mass of 16 8 O found from mass spectroscopy experiments is seen to be 15 99493 u Substracting the mass of 8 electrons (8 × 0
9
2776-2779
8 O nucleus The atomic mass of 16 8 O found from mass spectroscopy experiments is seen to be 15 99493 u Substracting the mass of 8 electrons (8 × 0 00055 u) from this, we get the experimental mass of 16 8 O nucleus to be 15
9
2777-2780
99493 u Substracting the mass of 8 electrons (8 × 0 00055 u) from this, we get the experimental mass of 16 8 O nucleus to be 15 99053 u
9
2778-2781
Substracting the mass of 8 electrons (8 × 0 00055 u) from this, we get the experimental mass of 16 8 O nucleus to be 15 99053 u Thus, we find that the mass of the 16 8 O nucleus is less than the total mass of its constituents by 0
9
2779-2782
00055 u) from this, we get the experimental mass of 16 8 O nucleus to be 15 99053 u Thus, we find that the mass of the 16 8 O nucleus is less than the total mass of its constituents by 0 13691u
9
2780-2783
99053 u Thus, we find that the mass of the 16 8 O nucleus is less than the total mass of its constituents by 0 13691u The difference in mass of a nucleus and its constituents, DM, is called the mass defect, and is given by [ ( ) ] p n M Zm A Z m M ∆ = + − − (13
9
2781-2784
Thus, we find that the mass of the 16 8 O nucleus is less than the total mass of its constituents by 0 13691u The difference in mass of a nucleus and its constituents, DM, is called the mass defect, and is given by [ ( ) ] p n M Zm A Z m M ∆ = + − − (13 7) What is the meaning of the mass defect
9
2782-2785
13691u The difference in mass of a nucleus and its constituents, DM, is called the mass defect, and is given by [ ( ) ] p n M Zm A Z m M ∆ = + − − (13 7) What is the meaning of the mass defect It is here that Einstein’s equivalence of mass and energy plays a role
9
2783-2786
The difference in mass of a nucleus and its constituents, DM, is called the mass defect, and is given by [ ( ) ] p n M Zm A Z m M ∆ = + − − (13 7) What is the meaning of the mass defect It is here that Einstein’s equivalence of mass and energy plays a role Since the mass of the oxygen nucleus is less that the sum of the masses of its constituents (8 protons and 8 neutrons, in the unbound state), the equivalent energy of the oxygen nucleus is less than that of the sum of the equivalent energies of its constituents
9
2784-2787
7) What is the meaning of the mass defect It is here that Einstein’s equivalence of mass and energy plays a role Since the mass of the oxygen nucleus is less that the sum of the masses of its constituents (8 protons and 8 neutrons, in the unbound state), the equivalent energy of the oxygen nucleus is less than that of the sum of the equivalent energies of its constituents If one wants to break the oxygen nucleus into 8 protons and 8 neutrons, this extra energy DM c2, has to supplied
9
2785-2788
It is here that Einstein’s equivalence of mass and energy plays a role Since the mass of the oxygen nucleus is less that the sum of the masses of its constituents (8 protons and 8 neutrons, in the unbound state), the equivalent energy of the oxygen nucleus is less than that of the sum of the equivalent energies of its constituents If one wants to break the oxygen nucleus into 8 protons and 8 neutrons, this extra energy DM c2, has to supplied This energy required Eb is related to the mass defect by Eb = D M c2 (13
9
2786-2789
Since the mass of the oxygen nucleus is less that the sum of the masses of its constituents (8 protons and 8 neutrons, in the unbound state), the equivalent energy of the oxygen nucleus is less than that of the sum of the equivalent energies of its constituents If one wants to break the oxygen nucleus into 8 protons and 8 neutrons, this extra energy DM c2, has to supplied This energy required Eb is related to the mass defect by Eb = D M c2 (13 8) Example 13
9
2787-2790
If one wants to break the oxygen nucleus into 8 protons and 8 neutrons, this extra energy DM c2, has to supplied This energy required Eb is related to the mass defect by Eb = D M c2 (13 8) Example 13 3 Find the energy equivalent of one atomic mass unit, first in Joules and then in MeV
9
2788-2791
This energy required Eb is related to the mass defect by Eb = D M c2 (13 8) Example 13 3 Find the energy equivalent of one atomic mass unit, first in Joules and then in MeV Using this, express the mass defect of 16 8 O in MeV/c2
9
2789-2792
8) Example 13 3 Find the energy equivalent of one atomic mass unit, first in Joules and then in MeV Using this, express the mass defect of 16 8 O in MeV/c2 Solution 1u = 1
9
2790-2793
3 Find the energy equivalent of one atomic mass unit, first in Joules and then in MeV Using this, express the mass defect of 16 8 O in MeV/c2 Solution 1u = 1 6605 × 10–27 kg To convert it into energy units, we multiply it by c 2 and find that energy equivalent = 1
9
2791-2794
Using this, express the mass defect of 16 8 O in MeV/c2 Solution 1u = 1 6605 × 10–27 kg To convert it into energy units, we multiply it by c 2 and find that energy equivalent = 1 6605 × 10–27 × (2
9
2792-2795
Solution 1u = 1 6605 × 10–27 kg To convert it into energy units, we multiply it by c 2 and find that energy equivalent = 1 6605 × 10–27 × (2 9979 × 108)2 kg m2/s2 = 1
9
2793-2796
6605 × 10–27 kg To convert it into energy units, we multiply it by c 2 and find that energy equivalent = 1 6605 × 10–27 × (2 9979 × 108)2 kg m2/s2 = 1 4924 × 10–10 J = 10 1
9
2794-2797
6605 × 10–27 × (2 9979 × 108)2 kg m2/s2 = 1 4924 × 10–10 J = 10 1 4924 1019 eV 1
9
2795-2798
9979 × 108)2 kg m2/s2 = 1 4924 × 10–10 J = 10 1 4924 1019 eV 1 602 10 − − × × = 0
9
2796-2799
4924 × 10–10 J = 10 1 4924 1019 eV 1 602 10 − − × × = 0 9315 × 109 eV = 931
9
2797-2800
4924 1019 eV 1 602 10 − − × × = 0 9315 × 109 eV = 931 5 MeV or, 1u = 931
9
2798-2801
602 10 − − × × = 0 9315 × 109 eV = 931 5 MeV or, 1u = 931 5 MeV/c2 For 16 8 O , DM = 0
9
2799-2802
9315 × 109 eV = 931 5 MeV or, 1u = 931 5 MeV/c2 For 16 8 O , DM = 0 13691 u = 0
9
2800-2803
5 MeV or, 1u = 931 5 MeV/c2 For 16 8 O , DM = 0 13691 u = 0 13691×931
9
2801-2804
5 MeV/c2 For 16 8 O , DM = 0 13691 u = 0 13691×931 5 MeV/c2 = 127
9
2802-2805
13691 u = 0 13691×931 5 MeV/c2 = 127 5 MeV/c 2 The energy needed to separate 16 8 O into its constituents is thus 127
9
2803-2806
13691×931 5 MeV/c2 = 127 5 MeV/c 2 The energy needed to separate 16 8 O into its constituents is thus 127 5 MeV/c2
9
2804-2807
5 MeV/c2 = 127 5 MeV/c 2 The energy needed to separate 16 8 O into its constituents is thus 127 5 MeV/c2 If a certain number of neutrons and protons are brought together to form a nucleus of a certain charge and mass, an energy Eb will be released Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 312 in the process
9
2805-2808
5 MeV/c 2 The energy needed to separate 16 8 O into its constituents is thus 127 5 MeV/c2 If a certain number of neutrons and protons are brought together to form a nucleus of a certain charge and mass, an energy Eb will be released Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 312 in the process The energy Eb is called the binding energy of the nucleus
9
2806-2809
5 MeV/c2 If a certain number of neutrons and protons are brought together to form a nucleus of a certain charge and mass, an energy Eb will be released Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 312 in the process The energy Eb is called the binding energy of the nucleus If we separate a nucleus into its nucleons, we would have to supply a total energy equal to Eb, to those particles
9
2807-2810
If a certain number of neutrons and protons are brought together to form a nucleus of a certain charge and mass, an energy Eb will be released Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 312 in the process The energy Eb is called the binding energy of the nucleus If we separate a nucleus into its nucleons, we would have to supply a total energy equal to Eb, to those particles Although we cannot tear apart a nucleus in this way, the nuclear binding energy is still a convenient measure of how well a nucleus is held together
9
2808-2811
The energy Eb is called the binding energy of the nucleus If we separate a nucleus into its nucleons, we would have to supply a total energy equal to Eb, to those particles Although we cannot tear apart a nucleus in this way, the nuclear binding energy is still a convenient measure of how well a nucleus is held together A more useful measure of the binding between the constituents of the nucleus is the binding energy per nucleon, Ebn, which is the ratio of the binding energy Eb of a nucleus to the number of the nucleons, A, in that nucleus: Ebn = Eb / A (13
9
2809-2812
If we separate a nucleus into its nucleons, we would have to supply a total energy equal to Eb, to those particles Although we cannot tear apart a nucleus in this way, the nuclear binding energy is still a convenient measure of how well a nucleus is held together A more useful measure of the binding between the constituents of the nucleus is the binding energy per nucleon, Ebn, which is the ratio of the binding energy Eb of a nucleus to the number of the nucleons, A, in that nucleus: Ebn = Eb / A (13 9) We can think of binding energy per nucleon as the average energy per nucleon needed to separate a nucleus into its individual nucleons
9
2810-2813
Although we cannot tear apart a nucleus in this way, the nuclear binding energy is still a convenient measure of how well a nucleus is held together A more useful measure of the binding between the constituents of the nucleus is the binding energy per nucleon, Ebn, which is the ratio of the binding energy Eb of a nucleus to the number of the nucleons, A, in that nucleus: Ebn = Eb / A (13 9) We can think of binding energy per nucleon as the average energy per nucleon needed to separate a nucleus into its individual nucleons Figure 13
9
2811-2814
A more useful measure of the binding between the constituents of the nucleus is the binding energy per nucleon, Ebn, which is the ratio of the binding energy Eb of a nucleus to the number of the nucleons, A, in that nucleus: Ebn = Eb / A (13 9) We can think of binding energy per nucleon as the average energy per nucleon needed to separate a nucleus into its individual nucleons Figure 13 1 is a plot of the binding energy per nucleon Ebn versus the mass number A for a large number of nuclei
9
2812-2815
9) We can think of binding energy per nucleon as the average energy per nucleon needed to separate a nucleus into its individual nucleons Figure 13 1 is a plot of the binding energy per nucleon Ebn versus the mass number A for a large number of nuclei We notice the following main features of the plot: (i) the binding energy per nucleon, Ebn, is practically constant, i
9
2813-2816
Figure 13 1 is a plot of the binding energy per nucleon Ebn versus the mass number A for a large number of nuclei We notice the following main features of the plot: (i) the binding energy per nucleon, Ebn, is practically constant, i e
9
2814-2817
1 is a plot of the binding energy per nucleon Ebn versus the mass number A for a large number of nuclei We notice the following main features of the plot: (i) the binding energy per nucleon, Ebn, is practically constant, i e practically independent of the atomic number for nuclei of middle mass number ( 30 < A < 170)
9
2815-2818
We notice the following main features of the plot: (i) the binding energy per nucleon, Ebn, is practically constant, i e practically independent of the atomic number for nuclei of middle mass number ( 30 < A < 170) The curve has a maximum of about 8
9
2816-2819
e practically independent of the atomic number for nuclei of middle mass number ( 30 < A < 170) The curve has a maximum of about 8 75 MeV for A = 56 and has a value of 7
9
2817-2820
practically independent of the atomic number for nuclei of middle mass number ( 30 < A < 170) The curve has a maximum of about 8 75 MeV for A = 56 and has a value of 7 6 MeV for A = 238
9
2818-2821
The curve has a maximum of about 8 75 MeV for A = 56 and has a value of 7 6 MeV for A = 238 (ii) Ebn is lower for both light nuclei (A<30) and heavy nuclei (A>170)
9
2819-2822
75 MeV for A = 56 and has a value of 7 6 MeV for A = 238 (ii) Ebn is lower for both light nuclei (A<30) and heavy nuclei (A>170) We can draw some conclusions from these two observations: (i) The force is attractive and sufficiently strong to produce a binding energy of a few MeV per nucleon
9
2820-2823
6 MeV for A = 238 (ii) Ebn is lower for both light nuclei (A<30) and heavy nuclei (A>170) We can draw some conclusions from these two observations: (i) The force is attractive and sufficiently strong to produce a binding energy of a few MeV per nucleon (ii) The constancy of the binding energy in the range 30 < A < 170 is a consequence of the fact that the nuclear force is short-ranged
9
2821-2824
(ii) Ebn is lower for both light nuclei (A<30) and heavy nuclei (A>170) We can draw some conclusions from these two observations: (i) The force is attractive and sufficiently strong to produce a binding energy of a few MeV per nucleon (ii) The constancy of the binding energy in the range 30 < A < 170 is a consequence of the fact that the nuclear force is short-ranged Consider a particular nucleon inside a sufficiently large nucleus
9
2822-2825
We can draw some conclusions from these two observations: (i) The force is attractive and sufficiently strong to produce a binding energy of a few MeV per nucleon (ii) The constancy of the binding energy in the range 30 < A < 170 is a consequence of the fact that the nuclear force is short-ranged Consider a particular nucleon inside a sufficiently large nucleus It will be under the influence of only some of its neighbours, which come within the range of the nuclear force
9
2823-2826
(ii) The constancy of the binding energy in the range 30 < A < 170 is a consequence of the fact that the nuclear force is short-ranged Consider a particular nucleon inside a sufficiently large nucleus It will be under the influence of only some of its neighbours, which come within the range of the nuclear force If any other nucleon is at a distance more than the range of the nuclear force from the particular nucleon it will have no influence on the binding energy of the nucleon under consideration
9
2824-2827
Consider a particular nucleon inside a sufficiently large nucleus It will be under the influence of only some of its neighbours, which come within the range of the nuclear force If any other nucleon is at a distance more than the range of the nuclear force from the particular nucleon it will have no influence on the binding energy of the nucleon under consideration If a nucleon can have a maximum of p neighbours within the range of nuclear force, its binding energy would be proportional to p
9
2825-2828
It will be under the influence of only some of its neighbours, which come within the range of the nuclear force If any other nucleon is at a distance more than the range of the nuclear force from the particular nucleon it will have no influence on the binding energy of the nucleon under consideration If a nucleon can have a maximum of p neighbours within the range of nuclear force, its binding energy would be proportional to p Let the binding energy of the nucleus be pk, where k is a constant having the dimensions of energy
9
2826-2829
If any other nucleon is at a distance more than the range of the nuclear force from the particular nucleon it will have no influence on the binding energy of the nucleon under consideration If a nucleon can have a maximum of p neighbours within the range of nuclear force, its binding energy would be proportional to p Let the binding energy of the nucleus be pk, where k is a constant having the dimensions of energy If we increase A by adding nucleons they will not change the binding energy of a nucleon inside
9
2827-2830
If a nucleon can have a maximum of p neighbours within the range of nuclear force, its binding energy would be proportional to p Let the binding energy of the nucleus be pk, where k is a constant having the dimensions of energy If we increase A by adding nucleons they will not change the binding energy of a nucleon inside Since most of the nucleons in a large nucleus reside inside it and not on the surface, the change in binding energy per nucleon would be small
9
2828-2831
Let the binding energy of the nucleus be pk, where k is a constant having the dimensions of energy If we increase A by adding nucleons they will not change the binding energy of a nucleon inside Since most of the nucleons in a large nucleus reside inside it and not on the surface, the change in binding energy per nucleon would be small The binding energy per nucleon is a constant and is approximately equal to pk
9
2829-2832
If we increase A by adding nucleons they will not change the binding energy of a nucleon inside Since most of the nucleons in a large nucleus reside inside it and not on the surface, the change in binding energy per nucleon would be small The binding energy per nucleon is a constant and is approximately equal to pk The property that a given nucleon FIGURE 13
9
2830-2833
Since most of the nucleons in a large nucleus reside inside it and not on the surface, the change in binding energy per nucleon would be small The binding energy per nucleon is a constant and is approximately equal to pk The property that a given nucleon FIGURE 13 1 The binding energy per nucleon as a function of mass number
9
2831-2834
The binding energy per nucleon is a constant and is approximately equal to pk The property that a given nucleon FIGURE 13 1 The binding energy per nucleon as a function of mass number Rationalised 2023-24 313 Nuclei influences only nucleons close to it is also referred to as saturation property of the nuclear force
9
2832-2835
The property that a given nucleon FIGURE 13 1 The binding energy per nucleon as a function of mass number Rationalised 2023-24 313 Nuclei influences only nucleons close to it is also referred to as saturation property of the nuclear force (iii) A very heavy nucleus, say A = 240, has lower binding energy per nucleon compared to that of a nucleus with A = 120
9
2833-2836
1 The binding energy per nucleon as a function of mass number Rationalised 2023-24 313 Nuclei influences only nucleons close to it is also referred to as saturation property of the nuclear force (iii) A very heavy nucleus, say A = 240, has lower binding energy per nucleon compared to that of a nucleus with A = 120 Thus if a nucleus A = 240 breaks into two A = 120 nuclei, nucleons get more tightly bound
9
2834-2837
Rationalised 2023-24 313 Nuclei influences only nucleons close to it is also referred to as saturation property of the nuclear force (iii) A very heavy nucleus, say A = 240, has lower binding energy per nucleon compared to that of a nucleus with A = 120 Thus if a nucleus A = 240 breaks into two A = 120 nuclei, nucleons get more tightly bound This implies energy would be released in the process
9
2835-2838
(iii) A very heavy nucleus, say A = 240, has lower binding energy per nucleon compared to that of a nucleus with A = 120 Thus if a nucleus A = 240 breaks into two A = 120 nuclei, nucleons get more tightly bound This implies energy would be released in the process It has very important implications for energy production through fission, to be discussed later in Section 13
9
2836-2839
Thus if a nucleus A = 240 breaks into two A = 120 nuclei, nucleons get more tightly bound This implies energy would be released in the process It has very important implications for energy production through fission, to be discussed later in Section 13 7
9
2837-2840
This implies energy would be released in the process It has very important implications for energy production through fission, to be discussed later in Section 13 7 1
9
2838-2841
It has very important implications for energy production through fission, to be discussed later in Section 13 7 1 (iv) Consider two very light nuclei (A ≤ 10) joining to form a heavier nucleus