Chapter
stringclasses
18 values
sentence_range
stringlengths
3
9
Text
stringlengths
7
7.34k
9
1939-1942
40 kg m s − − × = 2 76 × 10–34 m This wavelength is so small that it is beyond any measurement This is the reason why macroscopic objects in our daily life do not show wave- like properties On the other hand, in the sub-atomic domain, the wave character of particles is significant and measurable
9
1940-1943
76 × 10–34 m This wavelength is so small that it is beyond any measurement This is the reason why macroscopic objects in our daily life do not show wave- like properties On the other hand, in the sub-atomic domain, the wave character of particles is significant and measurable Example 11
9
1941-1944
This is the reason why macroscopic objects in our daily life do not show wave- like properties On the other hand, in the sub-atomic domain, the wave character of particles is significant and measurable Example 11 3 What is the de Broglie wavelength associated with (a) an electron moving with a speed of 5
9
1942-1945
On the other hand, in the sub-atomic domain, the wave character of particles is significant and measurable Example 11 3 What is the de Broglie wavelength associated with (a) an electron moving with a speed of 5 4´106 m/s, and (b) a ball of mass 150 g travelling at 30
9
1943-1946
Example 11 3 What is the de Broglie wavelength associated with (a) an electron moving with a speed of 5 4´106 m/s, and (b) a ball of mass 150 g travelling at 30 0 m/s
9
1944-1947
3 What is the de Broglie wavelength associated with (a) an electron moving with a speed of 5 4´106 m/s, and (b) a ball of mass 150 g travelling at 30 0 m/s Solution (a) For the electron: Mass m = 9
9
1945-1948
4´106 m/s, and (b) a ball of mass 150 g travelling at 30 0 m/s Solution (a) For the electron: Mass m = 9 11´10–31 kg, speed v = 5
9
1946-1949
0 m/s Solution (a) For the electron: Mass m = 9 11´10–31 kg, speed v = 5 4´106 m/s
9
1947-1950
Solution (a) For the electron: Mass m = 9 11´10–31 kg, speed v = 5 4´106 m/s Then, momentum p = m v = 9
9
1948-1951
11´10–31 kg, speed v = 5 4´106 m/s Then, momentum p = m v = 9 11´10–31 (kg) ´ 5
9
1949-1952
4´106 m/s Then, momentum p = m v = 9 11´10–31 (kg) ´ 5 4 ´ 106 (m/s) p = 4
9
1950-1953
Then, momentum p = m v = 9 11´10–31 (kg) ´ 5 4 ´ 106 (m/s) p = 4 92 ´ 10–24 kg m/s de Broglie wavelength, l = h/p =
9
1951-1954
11´10–31 (kg) ´ 5 4 ´ 106 (m/s) p = 4 92 ´ 10–24 kg m/s de Broglie wavelength, l = h/p = –34 –24 6 63 10 J s 4 92 10 kg m/s × × l = 0
9
1952-1955
4 ´ 106 (m/s) p = 4 92 ´ 10–24 kg m/s de Broglie wavelength, l = h/p = –34 –24 6 63 10 J s 4 92 10 kg m/s × × l = 0 135 nm (b) For the ball: Mass m ’ = 0
9
1953-1956
92 ´ 10–24 kg m/s de Broglie wavelength, l = h/p = –34 –24 6 63 10 J s 4 92 10 kg m/s × × l = 0 135 nm (b) For the ball: Mass m ’ = 0 150 kg, speed v ’ = 30
9
1954-1957
–34 –24 6 63 10 J s 4 92 10 kg m/s × × l = 0 135 nm (b) For the ball: Mass m ’ = 0 150 kg, speed v ’ = 30 0 m/s
9
1955-1958
135 nm (b) For the ball: Mass m ’ = 0 150 kg, speed v ’ = 30 0 m/s Then momentum p’ = m’ v’ = 0
9
1956-1959
150 kg, speed v ’ = 30 0 m/s Then momentum p’ = m’ v’ = 0 150 (kg) ´ 30
9
1957-1960
0 m/s Then momentum p’ = m’ v’ = 0 150 (kg) ´ 30 0 (m/s) p ’= 4
9
1958-1961
Then momentum p’ = m’ v’ = 0 150 (kg) ´ 30 0 (m/s) p ’= 4 50 kg m/s de Broglie wavelength l’ = h/p’
9
1959-1962
150 (kg) ´ 30 0 (m/s) p ’= 4 50 kg m/s de Broglie wavelength l’ = h/p’ –
9
1960-1963
0 (m/s) p ’= 4 50 kg m/s de Broglie wavelength l’ = h/p’ – 6 63 1034 Js 4 50 kg m/s × = × l’= 1
9
1961-1964
50 kg m/s de Broglie wavelength l’ = h/p’ – 6 63 1034 Js 4 50 kg m/s × = × l’= 1 47 ´10–34 m The de Broglie wavelength of electron is comparable with X-ray wavelengths
9
1962-1965
– 6 63 1034 Js 4 50 kg m/s × = × l’= 1 47 ´10–34 m The de Broglie wavelength of electron is comparable with X-ray wavelengths However, for the ball it is about 10–19 times the size of the proton, quite beyond experimental measurement
9
1963-1966
6 63 1034 Js 4 50 kg m/s × = × l’= 1 47 ´10–34 m The de Broglie wavelength of electron is comparable with X-ray wavelengths However, for the ball it is about 10–19 times the size of the proton, quite beyond experimental measurement SUMMARY 1
9
1964-1967
47 ´10–34 m The de Broglie wavelength of electron is comparable with X-ray wavelengths However, for the ball it is about 10–19 times the size of the proton, quite beyond experimental measurement SUMMARY 1 The minimum energy needed by an electron to come out from a metal surface is called the work function of the metal
9
1965-1968
However, for the ball it is about 10–19 times the size of the proton, quite beyond experimental measurement SUMMARY 1 The minimum energy needed by an electron to come out from a metal surface is called the work function of the metal Energy (greater than the work function (fo) required for electron emission from the metal surface can be supplied by suitably heating or applying strong electric field or irradiating it by light of suitable frequency
9
1966-1969
SUMMARY 1 The minimum energy needed by an electron to come out from a metal surface is called the work function of the metal Energy (greater than the work function (fo) required for electron emission from the metal surface can be supplied by suitably heating or applying strong electric field or irradiating it by light of suitable frequency 2
9
1967-1970
The minimum energy needed by an electron to come out from a metal surface is called the work function of the metal Energy (greater than the work function (fo) required for electron emission from the metal surface can be supplied by suitably heating or applying strong electric field or irradiating it by light of suitable frequency 2 Photoelectric effect is the phenomenon of emission of electrons by metals when illuminated by light of suitable frequency
9
1968-1971
Energy (greater than the work function (fo) required for electron emission from the metal surface can be supplied by suitably heating or applying strong electric field or irradiating it by light of suitable frequency 2 Photoelectric effect is the phenomenon of emission of electrons by metals when illuminated by light of suitable frequency Certain metals respond to ultraviolet light while others are sensitive even to the visible light
9
1969-1972
2 Photoelectric effect is the phenomenon of emission of electrons by metals when illuminated by light of suitable frequency Certain metals respond to ultraviolet light while others are sensitive even to the visible light Photoelectric effect involves conversion of light energy into electrical energy
9
1970-1973
Photoelectric effect is the phenomenon of emission of electrons by metals when illuminated by light of suitable frequency Certain metals respond to ultraviolet light while others are sensitive even to the visible light Photoelectric effect involves conversion of light energy into electrical energy It follows the law of conservation of energy
9
1971-1974
Certain metals respond to ultraviolet light while others are sensitive even to the visible light Photoelectric effect involves conversion of light energy into electrical energy It follows the law of conservation of energy The photoelectric emission is an instantaneous process and possesses certain special features
9
1972-1975
Photoelectric effect involves conversion of light energy into electrical energy It follows the law of conservation of energy The photoelectric emission is an instantaneous process and possesses certain special features Rationalised 2023-24 287 Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter 3
9
1973-1976
It follows the law of conservation of energy The photoelectric emission is an instantaneous process and possesses certain special features Rationalised 2023-24 287 Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter 3 Photoelectric current depends on (i) the intensity of incident light, (ii) the potential difference applied between the two electrodes, and (iii) the nature of the emitter material
9
1974-1977
The photoelectric emission is an instantaneous process and possesses certain special features Rationalised 2023-24 287 Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter 3 Photoelectric current depends on (i) the intensity of incident light, (ii) the potential difference applied between the two electrodes, and (iii) the nature of the emitter material 4
9
1975-1978
Rationalised 2023-24 287 Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter 3 Photoelectric current depends on (i) the intensity of incident light, (ii) the potential difference applied between the two electrodes, and (iii) the nature of the emitter material 4 The stopping potential (Vo) depends on (i) the frequency of incident light, and (ii) the nature of the emitter material
9
1976-1979
Photoelectric current depends on (i) the intensity of incident light, (ii) the potential difference applied between the two electrodes, and (iii) the nature of the emitter material 4 The stopping potential (Vo) depends on (i) the frequency of incident light, and (ii) the nature of the emitter material For a given frequency of incident light, it is independent of its intensity
9
1977-1980
4 The stopping potential (Vo) depends on (i) the frequency of incident light, and (ii) the nature of the emitter material For a given frequency of incident light, it is independent of its intensity The stopping potential is directly related to the maximum kinetic energy of electrons emitted: e V0 = (1/2) m v2 max = Kmax
9
1978-1981
The stopping potential (Vo) depends on (i) the frequency of incident light, and (ii) the nature of the emitter material For a given frequency of incident light, it is independent of its intensity The stopping potential is directly related to the maximum kinetic energy of electrons emitted: e V0 = (1/2) m v2 max = Kmax 5
9
1979-1982
For a given frequency of incident light, it is independent of its intensity The stopping potential is directly related to the maximum kinetic energy of electrons emitted: e V0 = (1/2) m v2 max = Kmax 5 Below a certain frequency (threshold frequency) n 0, characteristic of the metal, no photoelectric emission takes place, no matter how large the intensity may be
9
1980-1983
The stopping potential is directly related to the maximum kinetic energy of electrons emitted: e V0 = (1/2) m v2 max = Kmax 5 Below a certain frequency (threshold frequency) n 0, characteristic of the metal, no photoelectric emission takes place, no matter how large the intensity may be 6
9
1981-1984
5 Below a certain frequency (threshold frequency) n 0, characteristic of the metal, no photoelectric emission takes place, no matter how large the intensity may be 6 The classical wave theory could not explain the main features of photoelectric effect
9
1982-1985
Below a certain frequency (threshold frequency) n 0, characteristic of the metal, no photoelectric emission takes place, no matter how large the intensity may be 6 The classical wave theory could not explain the main features of photoelectric effect Its picture of continuous absorption of energy from radiation could not explain the independence of Kmax on intensity, the existence of no and the instantaneous nature of the process
9
1983-1986
6 The classical wave theory could not explain the main features of photoelectric effect Its picture of continuous absorption of energy from radiation could not explain the independence of Kmax on intensity, the existence of no and the instantaneous nature of the process Einstein explained these features on the basis of photon picture of light
9
1984-1987
The classical wave theory could not explain the main features of photoelectric effect Its picture of continuous absorption of energy from radiation could not explain the independence of Kmax on intensity, the existence of no and the instantaneous nature of the process Einstein explained these features on the basis of photon picture of light According to this, light is composed of discrete packets of energy called quanta or photons
9
1985-1988
Its picture of continuous absorption of energy from radiation could not explain the independence of Kmax on intensity, the existence of no and the instantaneous nature of the process Einstein explained these features on the basis of photon picture of light According to this, light is composed of discrete packets of energy called quanta or photons Each photon carries an energy E (= h n) and momentum p (= h/l), which depend on the frequency (n ) of incident light and not on its intensity
9
1986-1989
Einstein explained these features on the basis of photon picture of light According to this, light is composed of discrete packets of energy called quanta or photons Each photon carries an energy E (= h n) and momentum p (= h/l), which depend on the frequency (n ) of incident light and not on its intensity Photoelectric emission from the metal surface occurs due to absorption of a photon by an electron
9
1987-1990
According to this, light is composed of discrete packets of energy called quanta or photons Each photon carries an energy E (= h n) and momentum p (= h/l), which depend on the frequency (n ) of incident light and not on its intensity Photoelectric emission from the metal surface occurs due to absorption of a photon by an electron 7
9
1988-1991
Each photon carries an energy E (= h n) and momentum p (= h/l), which depend on the frequency (n ) of incident light and not on its intensity Photoelectric emission from the metal surface occurs due to absorption of a photon by an electron 7 Einstein’s photoelectric equation is in accordance with the energy conservation law as applied to the photon absorption by an electron in the metal
9
1989-1992
Photoelectric emission from the metal surface occurs due to absorption of a photon by an electron 7 Einstein’s photoelectric equation is in accordance with the energy conservation law as applied to the photon absorption by an electron in the metal The maximum kinetic energy (1/2)m v2 max is equal to the photon energy (hn ) minus the work function f0 (= hn0) of the target metal: 1 2 m v2 max = V0 e = hn – f0 = h (n – n0) This photoelectric equation explains all the features of the photoelectric effect
9
1990-1993
7 Einstein’s photoelectric equation is in accordance with the energy conservation law as applied to the photon absorption by an electron in the metal The maximum kinetic energy (1/2)m v2 max is equal to the photon energy (hn ) minus the work function f0 (= hn0) of the target metal: 1 2 m v2 max = V0 e = hn – f0 = h (n – n0) This photoelectric equation explains all the features of the photoelectric effect Millikan’s first precise measurements confirmed the Einstein’s photoelectric equation and obtained an accurate value of Planck’s constant h
9
1991-1994
Einstein’s photoelectric equation is in accordance with the energy conservation law as applied to the photon absorption by an electron in the metal The maximum kinetic energy (1/2)m v2 max is equal to the photon energy (hn ) minus the work function f0 (= hn0) of the target metal: 1 2 m v2 max = V0 e = hn – f0 = h (n – n0) This photoelectric equation explains all the features of the photoelectric effect Millikan’s first precise measurements confirmed the Einstein’s photoelectric equation and obtained an accurate value of Planck’s constant h This led to the acceptance of particle or photon description (nature) of electromagnetic radiation, introduced by Einstein
9
1992-1995
The maximum kinetic energy (1/2)m v2 max is equal to the photon energy (hn ) minus the work function f0 (= hn0) of the target metal: 1 2 m v2 max = V0 e = hn – f0 = h (n – n0) This photoelectric equation explains all the features of the photoelectric effect Millikan’s first precise measurements confirmed the Einstein’s photoelectric equation and obtained an accurate value of Planck’s constant h This led to the acceptance of particle or photon description (nature) of electromagnetic radiation, introduced by Einstein 8
9
1993-1996
Millikan’s first precise measurements confirmed the Einstein’s photoelectric equation and obtained an accurate value of Planck’s constant h This led to the acceptance of particle or photon description (nature) of electromagnetic radiation, introduced by Einstein 8 Radiation has dual nature: wave and particle
9
1994-1997
This led to the acceptance of particle or photon description (nature) of electromagnetic radiation, introduced by Einstein 8 Radiation has dual nature: wave and particle The nature of experiment determines whether a wave or particle description is best suited for understanding the experimental result
9
1995-1998
8 Radiation has dual nature: wave and particle The nature of experiment determines whether a wave or particle description is best suited for understanding the experimental result Reasoning that radiation and matter should be symmetrical in nature, Louis Victor de Broglie attributed a wave-like character to matter (material particles)
9
1996-1999
Radiation has dual nature: wave and particle The nature of experiment determines whether a wave or particle description is best suited for understanding the experimental result Reasoning that radiation and matter should be symmetrical in nature, Louis Victor de Broglie attributed a wave-like character to matter (material particles) The waves associated with the moving material particles are called matter waves or de Broglie waves
9
1997-2000
The nature of experiment determines whether a wave or particle description is best suited for understanding the experimental result Reasoning that radiation and matter should be symmetrical in nature, Louis Victor de Broglie attributed a wave-like character to matter (material particles) The waves associated with the moving material particles are called matter waves or de Broglie waves 9
9
1998-2001
Reasoning that radiation and matter should be symmetrical in nature, Louis Victor de Broglie attributed a wave-like character to matter (material particles) The waves associated with the moving material particles are called matter waves or de Broglie waves 9 The de Broglie wavelength (l) associated with a moving particle is related to its momentum p as: l = h/p
9
1999-2002
The waves associated with the moving material particles are called matter waves or de Broglie waves 9 The de Broglie wavelength (l) associated with a moving particle is related to its momentum p as: l = h/p The dualism of matter is inherent in the de Broglie relation which contains a wave concept (l) and a particle concept (p)
9
2000-2003
9 The de Broglie wavelength (l) associated with a moving particle is related to its momentum p as: l = h/p The dualism of matter is inherent in the de Broglie relation which contains a wave concept (l) and a particle concept (p) The de Broglie wavelength is independent of the charge and nature of the material particle
9
2001-2004
The de Broglie wavelength (l) associated with a moving particle is related to its momentum p as: l = h/p The dualism of matter is inherent in the de Broglie relation which contains a wave concept (l) and a particle concept (p) The de Broglie wavelength is independent of the charge and nature of the material particle It is significantly measurable (of the order of the atomic-planes spacing in crystals) only in case of sub-atomic particles like electrons, protons, etc
9
2002-2005
The dualism of matter is inherent in the de Broglie relation which contains a wave concept (l) and a particle concept (p) The de Broglie wavelength is independent of the charge and nature of the material particle It is significantly measurable (of the order of the atomic-planes spacing in crystals) only in case of sub-atomic particles like electrons, protons, etc (due to smallness of their masses and hence, momenta)
9
2003-2006
The de Broglie wavelength is independent of the charge and nature of the material particle It is significantly measurable (of the order of the atomic-planes spacing in crystals) only in case of sub-atomic particles like electrons, protons, etc (due to smallness of their masses and hence, momenta) However, it is indeed very small, quite beyond measurement, in case of macroscopic objects, commonly encountered in everyday life
9
2004-2007
It is significantly measurable (of the order of the atomic-planes spacing in crystals) only in case of sub-atomic particles like electrons, protons, etc (due to smallness of their masses and hence, momenta) However, it is indeed very small, quite beyond measurement, in case of macroscopic objects, commonly encountered in everyday life Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 288 POINTS TO PONDER 1
9
2005-2008
(due to smallness of their masses and hence, momenta) However, it is indeed very small, quite beyond measurement, in case of macroscopic objects, commonly encountered in everyday life Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 288 POINTS TO PONDER 1 Free electrons in a metal are free in the sense that they move inside the metal in a constant potential (This is only an approximation)
9
2006-2009
However, it is indeed very small, quite beyond measurement, in case of macroscopic objects, commonly encountered in everyday life Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 288 POINTS TO PONDER 1 Free electrons in a metal are free in the sense that they move inside the metal in a constant potential (This is only an approximation) They are not free to move out of the metal
9
2007-2010
Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 288 POINTS TO PONDER 1 Free electrons in a metal are free in the sense that they move inside the metal in a constant potential (This is only an approximation) They are not free to move out of the metal They need additional energy to get out of the metal
9
2008-2011
Free electrons in a metal are free in the sense that they move inside the metal in a constant potential (This is only an approximation) They are not free to move out of the metal They need additional energy to get out of the metal 2
9
2009-2012
They are not free to move out of the metal They need additional energy to get out of the metal 2 Free electrons in a metal do not all have the same energy
9
2010-2013
They need additional energy to get out of the metal 2 Free electrons in a metal do not all have the same energy Like molecules in a gas jar, the electrons have a certain energy distribution at a given temperature
9
2011-2014
2 Free electrons in a metal do not all have the same energy Like molecules in a gas jar, the electrons have a certain energy distribution at a given temperature This distribution is different from the usual Maxwell’s distribution that you have learnt in the study of kinetic theory of gases
9
2012-2015
Free electrons in a metal do not all have the same energy Like molecules in a gas jar, the electrons have a certain energy distribution at a given temperature This distribution is different from the usual Maxwell’s distribution that you have learnt in the study of kinetic theory of gases You will learn about it in later courses, but the difference has to do with the fact that electrons obey Pauli’s exclusion principle
9
2013-2016
Like molecules in a gas jar, the electrons have a certain energy distribution at a given temperature This distribution is different from the usual Maxwell’s distribution that you have learnt in the study of kinetic theory of gases You will learn about it in later courses, but the difference has to do with the fact that electrons obey Pauli’s exclusion principle 3
9
2014-2017
This distribution is different from the usual Maxwell’s distribution that you have learnt in the study of kinetic theory of gases You will learn about it in later courses, but the difference has to do with the fact that electrons obey Pauli’s exclusion principle 3 Because of the energy distribution of free electrons in a metal, the energy required by an electron to come out of the metal is different for different electrons
9
2015-2018
You will learn about it in later courses, but the difference has to do with the fact that electrons obey Pauli’s exclusion principle 3 Because of the energy distribution of free electrons in a metal, the energy required by an electron to come out of the metal is different for different electrons Electrons with higher energy require less additional energy to come out of the metal than those with lower energies
9
2016-2019
3 Because of the energy distribution of free electrons in a metal, the energy required by an electron to come out of the metal is different for different electrons Electrons with higher energy require less additional energy to come out of the metal than those with lower energies Work function is the least energy required by an electron to come out of the metal
9
2017-2020
Because of the energy distribution of free electrons in a metal, the energy required by an electron to come out of the metal is different for different electrons Electrons with higher energy require less additional energy to come out of the metal than those with lower energies Work function is the least energy required by an electron to come out of the metal 4
9
2018-2021
Electrons with higher energy require less additional energy to come out of the metal than those with lower energies Work function is the least energy required by an electron to come out of the metal 4 Observations on photoelectric effect imply that in the event of matter- light interaction, absorption of energy takes place in discrete units of hn
9
2019-2022
Work function is the least energy required by an electron to come out of the metal 4 Observations on photoelectric effect imply that in the event of matter- light interaction, absorption of energy takes place in discrete units of hn This is not quite the same as saying that light consists of particles, each of energy hn
9
2020-2023
4 Observations on photoelectric effect imply that in the event of matter- light interaction, absorption of energy takes place in discrete units of hn This is not quite the same as saying that light consists of particles, each of energy hn 5
9
2021-2024
Observations on photoelectric effect imply that in the event of matter- light interaction, absorption of energy takes place in discrete units of hn This is not quite the same as saying that light consists of particles, each of energy hn 5 Observations on the stopping potential (its independence of intensity and dependence on frequency) are the crucial discriminator between the wave-picture and photon-picture of photoelectric effect
9
2022-2025
This is not quite the same as saying that light consists of particles, each of energy hn 5 Observations on the stopping potential (its independence of intensity and dependence on frequency) are the crucial discriminator between the wave-picture and photon-picture of photoelectric effect 6
9
2023-2026
5 Observations on the stopping potential (its independence of intensity and dependence on frequency) are the crucial discriminator between the wave-picture and photon-picture of photoelectric effect 6 The wavelength of a matter wave given by λ =ph has physical significance; its phase velocity vp has no physical significance
9
2024-2027
Observations on the stopping potential (its independence of intensity and dependence on frequency) are the crucial discriminator between the wave-picture and photon-picture of photoelectric effect 6 The wavelength of a matter wave given by λ =ph has physical significance; its phase velocity vp has no physical significance However, the group velocity of the matter wave is physically meaningful and equals the velocity of the particle
9
2025-2028
6 The wavelength of a matter wave given by λ =ph has physical significance; its phase velocity vp has no physical significance However, the group velocity of the matter wave is physically meaningful and equals the velocity of the particle Physical Symbol Dimensions Unit Remarks Quantity Planck’s h [ML2T –1] J s E = hn constant Stopping V0 [ML2T –3A–1] V e V0= Kmax potential Work f0 [ML2T –2] J; eV Kmax = E –f0 function Threshold n0 [T –1] Hz n0 = f0/h frequency de Broglie l [L] m = h/p wavelength EXERCISES 11
9
2026-2029
The wavelength of a matter wave given by λ =ph has physical significance; its phase velocity vp has no physical significance However, the group velocity of the matter wave is physically meaningful and equals the velocity of the particle Physical Symbol Dimensions Unit Remarks Quantity Planck’s h [ML2T –1] J s E = hn constant Stopping V0 [ML2T –3A–1] V e V0= Kmax potential Work f0 [ML2T –2] J; eV Kmax = E –f0 function Threshold n0 [T –1] Hz n0 = f0/h frequency de Broglie l [L] m = h/p wavelength EXERCISES 11 1 Find the (a) maximum frequency, and (b) minimum wavelength of X-rays produced by 30 kV electrons
9
2027-2030
However, the group velocity of the matter wave is physically meaningful and equals the velocity of the particle Physical Symbol Dimensions Unit Remarks Quantity Planck’s h [ML2T –1] J s E = hn constant Stopping V0 [ML2T –3A–1] V e V0= Kmax potential Work f0 [ML2T –2] J; eV Kmax = E –f0 function Threshold n0 [T –1] Hz n0 = f0/h frequency de Broglie l [L] m = h/p wavelength EXERCISES 11 1 Find the (a) maximum frequency, and (b) minimum wavelength of X-rays produced by 30 kV electrons Rationalised 2023-24 289 Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter 11
9
2028-2031
Physical Symbol Dimensions Unit Remarks Quantity Planck’s h [ML2T –1] J s E = hn constant Stopping V0 [ML2T –3A–1] V e V0= Kmax potential Work f0 [ML2T –2] J; eV Kmax = E –f0 function Threshold n0 [T –1] Hz n0 = f0/h frequency de Broglie l [L] m = h/p wavelength EXERCISES 11 1 Find the (a) maximum frequency, and (b) minimum wavelength of X-rays produced by 30 kV electrons Rationalised 2023-24 289 Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter 11 2 The work function of caesium metal is 2
9
2029-2032
1 Find the (a) maximum frequency, and (b) minimum wavelength of X-rays produced by 30 kV electrons Rationalised 2023-24 289 Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter 11 2 The work function of caesium metal is 2 14 eV
9
2030-2033
Rationalised 2023-24 289 Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter 11 2 The work function of caesium metal is 2 14 eV When light of frequency 6 ×1014Hz is incident on the metal surface, photoemission of electrons occurs
9
2031-2034
2 The work function of caesium metal is 2 14 eV When light of frequency 6 ×1014Hz is incident on the metal surface, photoemission of electrons occurs What is the (a) maximum kinetic energy of the emitted electrons, (b) Stopping potential, and (c) maximum speed of the emitted photoelectrons
9
2032-2035
14 eV When light of frequency 6 ×1014Hz is incident on the metal surface, photoemission of electrons occurs What is the (a) maximum kinetic energy of the emitted electrons, (b) Stopping potential, and (c) maximum speed of the emitted photoelectrons 11
9
2033-2036
When light of frequency 6 ×1014Hz is incident on the metal surface, photoemission of electrons occurs What is the (a) maximum kinetic energy of the emitted electrons, (b) Stopping potential, and (c) maximum speed of the emitted photoelectrons 11 3 The photoelectric cut-off voltage in a certain experiment is 1
9
2034-2037
What is the (a) maximum kinetic energy of the emitted electrons, (b) Stopping potential, and (c) maximum speed of the emitted photoelectrons 11 3 The photoelectric cut-off voltage in a certain experiment is 1 5 V
9
2035-2038
11 3 The photoelectric cut-off voltage in a certain experiment is 1 5 V What is the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons emitted
9
2036-2039
3 The photoelectric cut-off voltage in a certain experiment is 1 5 V What is the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons emitted 11
9
2037-2040
5 V What is the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons emitted 11 4 Monochromatic light of wavelength 632
9
2038-2041
What is the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons emitted 11 4 Monochromatic light of wavelength 632 8 nm is produced by a helium-neon laser