text
stringlengths 0
643k
⌀ | meta
stringlengths 137
151
⌀ |
|---|---|
null | null |
# Introduction
Quantification of left ventricle (LV) from cardiac imaging is among the most clinically important and most frequently demanded tasks for identification and diagnosis of cardiac disease , yet still a challenging task due to the high variability of cardiac structure across subjects and the complicated global/regional temporal dynamics. Full quantification, i.e., to simultaneously quantify all LV indices including two areas, six regional wall thicknesses (RWT), three LV dimension, and one phase (as shown in Fig. [\[fig_indices\]](#fig_indices){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_indices"}), providing more detailed information for comprehensive cardiac function assessment, is even more challenging since the uncertain relatedness intra and inter each type of indices may hinder the learning procedure from better convergence and generalization. In this work, we propose a newly-designed deep multitask learning network FullLVNet for full quantification of LV respecting both intra-and inter-task relatedness. In clinical practice, obtaining reliable quantification is subjected to measuring on segmented myocardium, which is usually obtained by manually contouring the borders of myocardium or manual correction of contours generated by LV segmentation algorithms . However, manually contouring is time-consuming, of high inter-observer variability, and typically limited to the end diastolic (ED) and end systolic (ES) frames, which makes it insufficient for dynamic function analysis. LV segmentation algorithms, despite the recent advances, is still a difficult problem due to the lack of edge information and presence of shape variability. Most existing segmentation methods for cardiac MR images requires strong prior information and user interaction to obtain reliable results, which may prevent them from efficient clinical application. In recent years, direct methods without segmentation have grown in popularity in cardiac volumes estimation . Although these methods obtained effective performance by leveraging state-of-art machine learning techniques, they suffer from the following limitations. 1) Lack of powerful task-aware representation. The vulnerable hand-crafted or task-unaware features are not capable of capturing sufficient task-relevant cardiac structures. 2) Lack of temporal modeling. Independently handling each frame without assistance from neighbors can not guarantee the consistency and accuracy. 3) Not end-to-end learning. The separately learned representation and regression models cannot be optimal for each other. 4) Not full quantification. Only cardiac volume alone is not sufficient for comprehensive global, regional and dynamic function assessment. In this paper, we propose a newly-designed multitask learning network (FullLVNet), which is constituted by a specially tailored deep CNN for expressive feature embedding; two followed parallel RNN modules for temporal dynamic modeling; and four linear models for the final estimation. During the final estimation, FullLVNet is capable of improving the generalization by 1) modeling intra-task relatedness through group lasso regularization within each regression task; and 2) modeling inter-task relatedness with three phase-guided constraints that penalize violation of the temporal behavior of LV indices. After being trained with a two-step strategy, FullLVNet is capable of delivering accurate results for all the considered indices of cardiac LV.
# Multitask learning for full quantification of cardiac LV
The proposed FullLVNet models full quantification of cardiac LV as a multitask learning problem. Three regression tasks \(\{y_{area}^{s,f}, y_{dim}^{s,f}, y_{rwt}^{s,f}\}\) and one classification task \(y_{phase}^{s,f}\) are simultaneously learned to predict frame-wise values of the above mentioned LV indices from cardiac MR sequences \(\mathcal{X}=\{X^{s,f}\}\), where \(s=1\cdots S\) indexes the subject and \(f=1\cdots F\) indexes the frame. The objective of FullLVNet is: \[\label{eq_objective} W_{optimal}=\min_{W}\frac{1}{S\times F}\sum_{s,f}\sum_{t}L_t(\hat{y}_t^{s,f}(X^{s,f}|W),y_t^{s,f})+\lambda \mathcal{R}(W)\] where \(t\in \{area, dim, rwt, phase\}\) denotes a specific task, \(\hat{y}_t\) is the estimated results for task \(t\), \(L_t\) is the loss function of task \(t\) and \(\mathcal{R}(W)\) denotes regularization of parameters in the network.
## Architectures of FullLVNet
Fig. [\[fig_network\]](#fig_network){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_network"} shows the overview of FullLVNet. A deep CNN is firstly designed to extract from cardiac images expressive and task-aware feature, which is then fed to the RNN modules for temporal dynamic modeling. Final estimations are given by four linear models with the output of RNN modules as input. To improve generalization of FullLVNet, both intra-and inter-task relatednesses are carefully modeled through group lasso and phase-guided constraints for the linear models. **CNN for deep feature embedding** To obtain expressive and task-aware features, we design a specially tailored deep CNN for cardiac images, as shown in the left of Fig. [\[fig_network\]](#fig_network){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_network"}. Powerful representations can be obtained by transfer learning from well-known deep architectures in computer vision for applications with limited labeled data. However, transfer learning may incur 1) restriction of network architecture, resulting in incompatible or redundant model; and 2) restriction of input channel and dimension, leading to requirement of image resizing and channel expanding. We reduce the number of filters for each layer to avoid model redundancy. As for the kernel size of convolution and pooling, \(5\times 5\), instead of the frequently used \(3\times 3\), is deployed to introduce more shift invariance. Dropout and batch normalization are adopted to alleviate the training procedure. As can be seen in our experiments, our CNN is very effective for cardiac images even without transfer learning. As a feature embedding network, our CNN maps each cardiac image \(X^{s,f}\) into a fixed-length low dimension vector \(e^{s,f}=f_{cnn}(X^{s,f}|w_{cnn})\in \mathcal{R}^{100}\). **RNNs for temporal dynamic modeling** Accurate modeling of cardiac temporal dynamic assistants the quantification of current frame with information from neighbors. RNN, especially when LSTM units are deployed, is specialized in temporal dynamic modeling and has been employed in cardiac image segmentation and key frame recognition in cardiac sequences. In this work, two RNN modules, as shown by the green and yellow blocks in Fig. [\[fig_network\]](#fig_network){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_network"}, are deployed for the regression tasks and the classification task. For the three regression tasks, the indices to be estimated are mainly related to the spatial structure of cardiac LV in each frame. For the classification task, the cardiac phase is mainly related to the structure difference between successive frames. Therefore, the two RNN modules are designed to capture these two kinds of dependencies. The outputs of RNN modules are \(\{h_m^{s,1},,,,h_m^{s,F}\}=f_{rnn}([e^{s,1}...e^{s,F}]|w_{m}),m\in\{rnn1,rnn2\}\). **Final estimation** With the outputs of RNN modules, all the LV indices can be estimated with a linear regression/classification model: \[\label{eq_linear_model} \begin{cases} \hat{y}_{t}^{s,f}=w_{t}h_{rnn1}^{s,f}+b_t, ~where ~t\in\{area, dim, rwt\} \\ p(\hat{y}_{t}^{s,f}=0)=\frac{1}{1+\exp(w_{t}h_{rnn2}^{s,f}+b_t)}, ~t=phase \end{cases}\] where \(w_{t}\) and \(b_t\) are the weight and bias term of the linear model for task \(t\), \(0\) and \(1\) denote the two cardiac phase \(Diastole\) and \(Systole\), and \(p(\hat{y}_{phase}^{s,f}=1)=1-p(\hat{y}_{phase}^{s,f}=0)\). For the loss function in ([\[eq_objective\]](#eq_objective){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_objective"}), Euclidean distance and cross-entropy are employed for the regression tasks and the classification task, respectively. \[L_{t} = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2}\|\hat{y}_t^{s,f}-y_t^{s,f}\|_2^2, ~where ~t\in\{area, dim, rwt\}\\-\log p(\hat{y}_{t}^{s,f}=y_{t}^{s,f}),~t=phase \end{cases}\]
## Intra-task and inter-task relatedness
Significant correlations exist between the multiple outputs of each task and those of different tasks, and are referred as intra-and inter-task relatedness. Intra-task relatedness can be effectively modeled by the well-known group lasso regularization, while inter-task relatedness is modeled by three phase-guided constraints. Improved generalization can be achieved with both of them fully leveraged in our FullLVNet. **Intra-task relatedness based on group lasso** Group lasso, also known as L1/L2 regularization, can perfectly model relatedness within groups of outputs, i.e, the three regression tasks. It enforces common feature selection cross related outputs with the L2 norm, and encourages sparse selection of the most related features with the L1 norm for each task. In this way, the relevant features of different tasks can be well disentangled. To leverage this advantage, group lasso is applied to the weight parameters of the three regression models in ([\[eq_linear_model\]](#eq_linear_model){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_linear_model"}). \[\mathcal{R}_{intra}=\sum_t \sum_i\|w_t(i)\|_2, ~for ~t\in\{area, dim, rwt\}\] where \(w_t(i)\) denotes the \(i\)th column of \(w_t\). **Inter-task relatedness based on phase-guided constraints** Three phase-guided constraints are proposed to model inter-task relatedness, i.e, the cardiac phase and other LV indices. Cardiac phase indicates the temporal dynamics of LV myocardium in a cardiac cycle. Other LV indices change accordingly with cardiac phase: 1) cavity area and LV dimensions increase in the diastole phase and decrease in the systole phase; 2) myocardium area and RWT decrease in the diastole phase and increase in the systole phase. Effectively modeling such an intrinsic phase-guided relatedness would ensure that the estimated LV indices are consistent with the temporal dynamics of LV. To penalize violation of these inter-task relatednesses, three phase-guided constraints are applied to the predicted results of areas, dimensions and RWT. \[\begin{split} \mathcal{R}_{inter}^{area}=\frac{1}{2S\times F}&\sum_{s,f}[\mathbbm{1}(y_{phase}^{s,f}=0)(\max(-z_{area}^{s,f,1},0)+\max(z_{area}^{s,f,2},0))\\ &+\mathbbm{1}(y_{phase}^{s,f}=1)(\max(z_{area}^{s,f,1},0)+\max(-z_{area}^{s,f,2},0))] \end{split}\] \[\mathcal{R}_{inter}^{dim}=\frac{1}{S\times F}\sum_{s,f}[\mathbbm{1}(y_{phase}^{s,f}=0)\max(-\bar{z}_{dim}^{s,f},0)+ \mathbbm{1}(y_{phase}^{s,f}=1)\max(\bar{z}_{dim}^{s,f},0)]\] \[\mathcal{R}_{inter}^{rwt}=\frac{1}{S\times F}\sum_{s,f}[\mathbbm{1}(y_{phase}^{s,f}=0)\max(\bar{z}_{rwt}^{s,f},0)+ \mathbbm{1}(y_{phase}^{s,f}=1)\max(-\bar{z}_{rwt}^{s,f},0)]\] where \(\mathbbm{1}(\cdot)\) is the indicator function, \(z_t^{s,f}=\hat{y}_t^{s,f}-\hat{y}_t^{s,f-1}, for~t\in\{area,dim,rwt\}\), \(z_t^{s,f,i}\) denotes the \(i\)th output of \(z_t\) and \(\bar{z}_t\) denotes the average value of \(z_t\) across its multiple outputs. Totally, our regularization term becomes \[\mathcal{R}(W)=\lambda_1\mathcal{R}_{intra}+\lambda_2(\mathcal{R}_{inter}^{area}+\mathcal{R}_{inter}^{dim}+\mathcal{R}_{inter}^{rwt})\]
# Dataset and Configurations
Our FullLVNet is validated with short-axis cardiac MR images of 145 subjects. Temporal resolution is 20 frames per cardiac cycle, resulting in a total of 2900 images in the dataset. The pixel spacings range from 0.6836 mm/pixel to 2.0833 mm/pixel, with mode of 1.5625 mm/pixel. The ground truth values are computed from manually obtained contours of LV myocardium. Within each subject, frames are labeled as either Diastole phase or Systole phase, according to the obtained values of cavity area. In our experiments, two landmarks, i.e, junctions of the right ventricular wall with the left ventricular, are manually marked for each image to provide reference for ROI cropping and the LV myocardial segments division. The cropped images are resized to \(80\times80\). The network is implemented by Caffe with SGD solver. Five-fold cross validation is employed for performance evaluation and comparison. Data augmentation is conducted by randomly cropping images of size \(75\times 75\) from the resized image. **Two-step strategy training** We apply a two-step strategy for training our network to alleviate the difficulties caused by the different learning rate and loss function in multitask learning . Firstly the CNN embedding, the first RNN module and the three regression models are learned together with no back propagation from the classification task, to obtain accuracy prediction for the regression tasks; with the obtained CNN embedding, the second RNN module and the linear classification model are then learned while the rest of the network are kept frozen. As shown in the experiments, such a strategy delivers excellent performance for all the considered tasks.
# Results and Analysis
FullLVNet is extensively validated under different configurations in Table. [\[table_results\]](#table_results){reference-type="ref" reference="table_results"}. From the last column, we can draw that FullLVNet successfully delivers accurate predictions for all the considered indices, with average Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 1.41\(\pm0.72mm\), 2.68\(\pm1.64mm\), 190\(\pm128mm^2\) for RWT, dimension, and areas. For reference, the maximums of these indices in our dataset are 24.4\(mm\), 81.0\(mm\), 4936\(mm^2\). Error rate (1-accuracy) for phase identification is 10.4%. Besides, the effectivenesses of intra-and inter-task relatedness are also demonstrated by the results in the third and fourth column: intra-task relatedness brings clearly improvements for all the tasks, while inter-task relatedness further brings moderate improvement. Compared to the recent direct multi-feature based method , which we adapt to our full quantification task, FullLVNet shows remarkable advantages even without intra-and inter-task relatedness.
# Conclusions
We propose a multitask learning network FullLVNet for full quantification of LV, which includes three regression tasks and one classification task. By taking advantages of expressive feature embeddings from deep CNN and effective dynamic temporal modeling from RNN, and leveraging intra-and inter-task relatedness with group lasso regularization and phase-guided constraints, FullLVNet is capable of delivering state-of-art accuracy for all the tasks considered. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-15T02:08:30', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01912', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01912'} |
null | null |
# Introduction
Process Control Systems (PCSs) are at the core of Critical Infrastructures (CIs), as they control, automate and monitor most of the processes that power modern societies. Power generation, transport, critical manufacturing, water treatment and fuel transport are some examples of CIs. As such, it is necessary to protect PCSs and related assets in order to ensure the correct functioning of modern societies. This necessity has been further revealed by the existence of security incidents directly related to PCSs where skilled attackers disturbed normal functioning of PCSs, affecting the surrounding environment, some of them concerning CIs. Examples of successful cyber-attacks involving PCSs with physical impact include Stuxnet and the German Steel Plant incident . Consequently, PCS security has been the object of considerable research attention, specially in the development of novel security mechanisms. Among these mechanisms, Anomaly Detection Systems (ADSs) have a prominent space. The predictable and static nature of PCSs make them suitable candidates for anomaly detection . However, when detecting a particular anomalous event in PCSs, the factors that cause it can be diverse. These factors can be classified in two large sets: process disturbances or malfunctioning, and attacks or intrusions. In this paper we analyze the limitation and possibilities of distinguishing process disturbances and intrusions by using Multivariate Statistical Process Control (MSPC) in a process agnostic manner. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section [2](#mi:sec:related){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:sec:related"} presents related works in the literature. Section [3](#mi:sec:mspc){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:sec:mspc"} introduces Multivariate Statistical Process Control. Section [4](#mi:sec:approach){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:sec:approach"} outlines our approach while Section [5](#mi:sec:results){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:sec:results"} evaluates it experimentally. Finally, Sections [6](#mi:sec:conclusions){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:sec:conclusions"} and [7](#mi:sec:future){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:sec:future"} extract some conclusions and draw some lines for further work, respectively.
# Related Work {#mi:sec:related}
Anomaly detection in PCSs and industrial environments in general has gathered wide attention from the scientific community. While most of the approaches leverage network level data to detect anomalies in PCSs (see survey ), other proposals, such as ours, address this task by leveraging process and sensor-level data. When dealing with process level data, proposals can be further classified in two subgroups: (1) solutions that require a model of the monitored process to detect anomalies and (2) approaches where modelling the process is not necessary. Process model dependant contributions include the work of McEvoy and Wolthusen and Svendsen and Wolthusen . While effective to detect anomalies, these approaches require accurate modelling of the physical process. This requirement poses an important obstacle for implementing detection systems of this nature, especially in complex processes. More process-independent approaches on the other hand, include the work of Kiss et al. and Krotofil et al. . Kiss et al. present an anomaly detection technique based on the Gaussian mixture model clustering of the sensor-level observations. Later, they use silhouette examinations to interpret the results. Nevertheless, they only consider attacks as possible factors for abnormal situations in the process, without considering process faults or disturbances. Therefore, process related anomalies could be mislabeled as attacks and vice versa. Krotofil et al. propose a method to detect when attackers tamper with sensor signals. To this end, they use entropy to detect inconsistent sensor signals among a cluster of correlated signals. Although they consider scenarios with process disturbances, there is no direct comparison between tampered sensor signals and similar process disturbances. In this approach, we go beyond the state of the art by presenting a novel security anomaly detection and diagnosis technique for PCSs. Additionally, we also analyze the effect of process disturbances and its effect when detecting security anomalies.
# Multivariate Statistical Process Control {#mi:sec:mspc}
Figure [\[mi:fig:example_control_chart\]](#mi:fig:example_control_chart){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:example_control_chart"} shows an example of a control chart. Under normal process operating conditions, 99% of all the points will fall under the upper control limit. In that case, we consider that the process is in a state of *statistical control*. It is important not to confuse the term statistical control with other similar terms, such as automatic feedback control, as they refer to different concepts. Statistical control refers to the state of the process where only common causes of variation are present . The existence of consistent observation series over the established control limit, is likely to be attributed to a new special cause. In the case of PCSs, this variation source may be attributed to attacks or process disturbances, i.e. an anomaly. By using tools such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), MSPC provides an efficient methodology to monitor variable magnitude and relation to other variables.
## PCA-based MSPC
Let us consider process historical data as an \(\mathbf{X} = N\times M\) two-dimensional dataset, where \(M\) variables are measured for \(N\) observations. PCA transforms the original \(M\)-dimensional variable space into a new subspace where variance is maximal. It converts the original variables into a new set of uncorrelated variables (generally fewer in number), called Principal Components (PCs) or Latent Variables. For a mean-centered and auto-scaled[^1] \(\mathbf{X}\) and \(A\) principal components, PCA follows the next expression: \[\mathbf{X} = \mathbf{T_A P^{t}_A} +\mathbf{E_A}\] where \(\mathbf{T_A}\) is the \(N \times A\) score matrix, that is, the original observations represented according to the new subspace; \(\mathbf{P^{t}_A}\) is the \(M \times A\) loading matrix, representing the linear combination of the original variables that form each of the PCs; finally, \(\mathbf{E_A}\) is the \(N \times M\) matrix of residuals. In PCA-based MSPC, both the scores and the residuals are monitored, each in a separate control chart . On the one hand, to comprise the scores, the D-statistic or Hotelling's \(T^2\) is monitored. On the other hand, in the case of the residuals, the chosen statistic is the Q-statistic or \(SPE\) . \(D\) and \(Q\) statistics are computed for each of the observations in the calibration data, and control limits are set for each of the two charts. Later, these statistics are also computed for incoming data and plotted in the control chart. When an unexpected change occurs in one (or more) of the original measured \(M\) variables, one (or both) of these statistics will go beyond control limits. Thus, a \(M\)-dimensional monitoring scenario is effectively converted into a two-dimensional one. In this work, we consider an event as anomalous when three consecutive observations surpass the 99% confidence level control limit. Once an anomaly has been detected, we use oMEDA plots to diagnose the anomaly causes by relating anomalous events to the original variables. In essence, oMEDA plots are bar plots where the highest or lowest values in a set of variables reflect their contribution to a group of observations. Therefore, when computed on a group of observations within an anomalous event, the most relevant variables related to that particular event will be the ones with the highest and lowest bars.
# Proposed approach {#mi:sec:approach}
Figure [\[mi:fig:example_pcs\]](#mi:fig:example_pcs){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:example_pcs"} shows an example of a PCS. At the core of the system resides a physical process, with a fixed number of sensors and actuators. These sensors and actuators are the input/output devices that controllers use to interact with the process. Controllers read process data from the sensors, and according to the control algorithm implemented in them, they decide what is the next step to be performed on the actuators. Once the actuators change, the process evolves and with it, the sensor reading. Then, sensor data is fed to the controllers again, thus repeating the steps. However, the communication between process controllers and sensor/actuators is often performed over insecure transmission lines, frequently using unencrypted, unauthenticated, legacy protocols. Thus, it is possible for an attacker to interact with the communication, performing Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks. This can lead to situations where the data fed to the controller is not the real read by the sensors, or that the actuators receive data that was not sent as such by the controllers. In this work we use MSPC over a simulated industrial process, the Tennessee-Eastman , to detect anomalies and diagnose their cause distinguishing between natural (disturbances) and human induced (attacks) factors.
## Tennessee-Eastman process {#mi:sec:te}
The Tennessee-Eastman (TE) process is a well-known challenge process, modeled after a real chemical process. First presented by Downs and Vogel , it has been widely used by researchers to test different control strategies. Though initially designed as a process control challenge, the TE process has also become a prominent choice among security research works . In this work we use Ricker's decentralized control strategy, along with the added randomness model by Krotofil et al. . The TE model has 41 measured variables (XMEAS), 12 manipulated variables (XMV) and 20 process disturbances (IDV) implemented. For a full description of the variables and disturbances, refer to . The XMEAS are read by the controllers, and interact by setting values to the XMVs. Compared to the simplified Figure [\[mi:fig:example_pcs\]](#mi:fig:example_pcs){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:example_pcs"}, XMEAS variables correspond to the sensor readings and XMVs to the actuator settings. Process disturbances are unexpected and undesired changes in process conditions that can affect process normal operation. Out of the modelled disturbances, IDV(6) is one of the most difficult to handle. It models a loss of reactant in an input feed (Feed A). The input flux of feed A is measured by XMEAS(1), whereas XMV(3) is the manipulated that controls the valve of feed A. Therefore, it is to be expected that attacks on closing the valve XMV(3) and the existence of disturbance IDV(6), will affect similarly to XMEAS(1). Figure [\[mi:fig:a_feed\]](#mi:fig:a_feed){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:a_feed"} shows both situations. When monitoring XMEAS(1), there is almost no difference between IDV(6) and an integrity attack on XMV(3) where the attacker commands closing the valve controlling feed A, as the flow decreases abruptly in both cases. Both the disturbance and the attack occur at the tenth hour. After 17 hours and 43 minutes, the process shuts down in both cases as the stripper liquid level becomes too low to continue safe operation of the plant. Having a process disturbance and a potential attack on a process variable that react almost identically with the process provides a sound setup to test the performance of techniques that try to distinguish them.
## Adversary modelling
The adversary and attack models considered in this scenario are the ones proposed by Krotofil et al. . We consider that the adversary is able to read and manipulate network traffic, between controllers and the physical process as depicted in Figure [\[mi:fig:example_pcs\]](#mi:fig:example_pcs){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:example_pcs"}. Therefore, the attacker is capable of manipulating input data both at the controllers' (forged XMEAS data) and/or the physical process' (forged XMV data) end, performing an integrity attack. Following the model of Krotofil et al. , we consider an attacked variable \(Y'_i(t)\) at time \(t\), \(0\leq t\leq T\) as follows, where \(T\) is the duration of the simulation and \(T_a\) the arbitrary attack interval. An integrity attack is defined as follows: \[Y'_i(t) = \begin{cases} Y_i(t), & \mbox{for } t \notin T_a \\ Y^{a}_i(t), & \mbox{for } t \in T_a \end{cases}\] where \(Y_i^a(t)\) is the modified variable value injected by the attacker. Similarly, during DoS, the attacker effectively stops communication, and no communication reaches the actuator or the controller. Krotofil et al. define as a DoS attack starting at \(t_a\) as: \[Y^a_i(t)= Y_i(t_a-1)\] where \(Y_i^a\) is the last value received before the DoS attacks.
# Experimental results {#mi:sec:results}
In order to evaluate our approach, we conduct a set of experiments where the randomized TE model is run ten times per anomalous situation. The model we used for the set of experiments is the DVCP-TE model presented by Krotofil and Larsen , freely available on Github[^2]. The time length of each simulation is 72 hours, except in the cases where the process shut itself down due to safety constraints. For each simulation hour, variable data is recorded 2000 times, that is, every 1.75 seconds. Calibration data consists of 30 runs, and this data is used to build the MSPC model and establish the control limits of the \(D\) and \(Q\) statistics. All anomalies start at the 10th hour of simulation. For each of the anomalous situations, we calculate the Average Run Length (ARL), that refers to the lapsed time between the start of the anomalous event and its detection in the control charts. As previously stated, an event is flagged as anomalous when three consecutive observations surpass the 99% control limit. Once an anomaly is flagged, oMEDA charts are computed for the set of the first observations that surpass control limits in each of the ten runs in either of the two control charts (monitoring \(D\) and \(Q\)-statistic). For each anomalous event two plots are created, one with real process data (data the process receives and sends), and the other with controller level data. Both data sets will be identical in case of an attack free environment. But, in the case of attacks, both data sets will diverge. For the analysis of the process data, and plotting purposes, we used the MEDA toolbox . We set four different scenarios: *a)* Disturbance IDV(6), *b)* Integrity attack on XMV(3), *c)* Integrity attack on XMEAS(1), and *d)* Denial of Service on XMV(3). Resultant oMEDA for controller level and process level variables are shown in Figures [\[mi:fig:cn_omedas\]](#mi:fig:cn_omedas){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:cn_omedas"} and [\[mi:fig:sn_omedas\]](#mi:fig:sn_omedas){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:sn_omedas"}, respectively. Figures [\[mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_close_controller\]](#mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_close_controller){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_close_controller"} and [\[mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_close_process\]](#mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_close_process){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_close_process"} show the oMEDA charts for the case of where the attacker performs and attack and closes the valve of feed A. In this case, from the controllers point of view, the anomaly is similar to the one with IDV(6). It is when we look at process-level data that we see that the real concerned variable is not XMEAS(1). Rather, the attacker is manipulating XMV(3) to perform the attack. Figures [\[mi:fig:omeda_xmeas1_close_controller\]](#mi:fig:omeda_xmeas1_close_controller){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:omeda_xmeas1_close_controller"} and [\[mi:fig:omeda_xmeas1_close_process\]](#mi:fig:omeda_xmeas1_close_process){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:omeda_xmeas1_close_process"} shows the oMEDA plots of an scenario where the attacker manipulates the XMEAS(1) variable and sets it to zero. Therefore, the controller receives the information that there is no flow in Feed A. That is why the XMEAS(1) value from the controller point of view is lower than usual, because the attacker has set it so. As the control algorithm tries to tackle the situation, it opens XMV(3) more, and thus flowing more reactant A to the process. From the process point of view, that is the reason XMV(3) and XMEAS(1) have higher values than usual. oMEDA plots for a DoS attack on XMV(3) are shown in Figures [\[mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_dos_controller\]](#mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_dos_controller){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_dos_controller"} and [\[mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_dos_process\]](#mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_dos_process){reference-type="ref" reference="mi:fig:omeda_xmv3_dos_process"}. In this scenario, the process keeps receiving a constant value, previous to the attack. Neither of the oMEDA plots show a variable, let alone XMV(3) that stands out clearly among others. It is worth noting that the ARL, on the other cases almost immediate, in DoS attacks is significantly higher. In this case, DoS detection takes almost an hour.
## Discussion
Our approach detects all anomalous situations of disturbances and attacks. However, when diagnosing an anomaly, controller-based readings--on witch traditional MSPC has relied on--are not enough to do so correctly. Both integrity attacks and the process disturbance are diagnosed in a very similar way, in a manner that it is not feasible to distinguish what caused the anomaly. To address this matter, we have extended the MSPC model and measure both process and controller level variables. Having this two level input makes possible monitoring a wide range of process variables. Moreover, when anomalies occur, it is possible to distinguish the origin of the anomaly. When considering DoS attacks, the ARL is significantly longer than with integrity attacks or process disturbances and the diagnosis is not as clear as in the other scenarios.
# Conclusions {#mi:sec:conclusions}
We have presented a process-independent approach to detect and distinguish process disturbances from related attacks. Unlike previous approaches, it is not a process-dependant approach and it is able distinguish between disturbances and attacks. Our methodology is based on MSPC for anomaly detection and oMEDA plots for anomaly diagnosis. We have used the popular Tennessee-Eastman process to experimentally evaluate our approach. Distinguishing process disturbances and low level attacks in PCSs is a complex task, especially if all controller's I/O are to be considered compromised. We extended the traditional MSPC model to monitor both controller and process level variables, to efficiently monitor PCSs. Often, PCSs assign measured variables to the manipulated ones, so this approach is feasible in these environments. This scenario, would also complicate the work of an attacker, as it would need to forge both the target manipulated variable and the associated measured one to avoid detection. When analyzing process disturbances or integrity attacks, the oMEDA plots clearly show the implicated variables. In the case of DoS, detection time is significantly longer and the diagnosis with oMEDA is not related to the attacked variable.
# Future work {#mi:sec:future}
To overcome current anomaly diagnosis limitations, it is necessary to add more information to the MSPC model. In the case of PCSs, a promising source of additional information is the one created at the network level (packets, flows, logs etc.). MSPC-like methodologies have already been used in regular IT networked environments for security monitoring . We are confident that adding network-level variables to the ones of the process will ease anomaly diagnosis (e.g. by detecting increased traffic in the case of network DoS attacks) and will also shorten the ARL required to detect anomalies, as while the process might be slow to surpass control limits due to slow dynamics, network variables show more immediate information. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:04:58', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01679', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01679'} |
null | null |
# Introduction
Developing a new drug to the market is very costly and usually takes too much time. Therefore, in order to save time and cost, scientists have tried to identify new uses of existing drugs, known as drug repositioning. Moreover, predicting these interactions between drugs and targets is one of the most active domains in drug research since they can help in the drug discovery, drug side-effect and drug repositioning. Currently, the known interactions between drugs and target proteins are very limited, while it is believed that any single drug can interact with multiple targets. However, laboratory experiments of biochemical verification on drug-target interactions are extremely expensive, laborious and time-consuming since there are too many possible interactions to check. Thanks to the increasing capability to collect, store and process large-scale chemical and protein data, *in silico* prediction of the interactions between drugs and target proteins becomes an effective and efficient tool for discovering the new uses of existing drugs. The prediction results provide helpful evidences to select potential candidates of drug-target interactions for further biochemical verification, which can reduce the costs and risks of failed drug development. There are two major approaches in *in silico* prediction, including docking simulation and machine learning. Docking simulation is a common method in biology, but it has two major limitations. Firstly, this method requires three-dimensional structures of targets to compute the binding of each drug candidate, but such kind of information is usually not available. Secondly, it is very time-consuming. Therefore, in the last decade, many efforts have been made to solve the DTI prediction problem by machine learning approaches. Most known machine learning methods treat DTI prediction as a binary classification prediction in which the drug-target interactions are regarded as instances and the characteristics of the drugs and target proteins are considered as features. To train the classifier, machine learning methods require label data, e.g., positive samples of truly existing interactions and negative samples of noninteractive pairs. Normally, the positive samples are available, but the negative samples are not known. Whenever extra characteristic information about the drugs and targets are not available and only a portion of interactions between drugs and targets are known, similarity-based methods are suitable to solve this problem. However, there are also some limitations of the similarity-based methods. Firstly, similarity-based methods are not applicable for new drugs or targets that do not have any interactions at all since the methods cannot compute their similarities with the others. Secondly, although similarity-based methods are simple, sometimes they do not perform well since common neighbor and Jaccard indices, Cannistraci resource allocation (CRA) and Cannistraci Jaccard index (CJC) utilize only local information of networks. Katz index also performs unsatisfactorily (will show later) since the large decay factor will bring redundant information, while the small decay factor makes Katz index close to common neighbor index or local path index. To overcome the limitations of machine learning methods and similarity-based methods, we propose a matrix-based method, namely low-rank matrix projection (LMP). LMP does not require negative samples. When the extra characteristic information of drugs and target proteins are not available, LMP utilizes only the known interactions. On the other hand, if the extra information is available, LMP can also take such information into consideration and remarkably improve the performances. LMP has been shown to perform better than similarity-based methods on the five renown datasets (e.g., MATADOR, enzyme, ion channel, GPCR and nuclear receptor). By embedding extra information of drugs and targets, LMP has been shown to outperform many baseline methods that also use extra information. Finally, LMP can effectively predict the potential interactions of new drugs or targets that do not have any known interactions at all. The proposed method can help selecting the most likely existing interactions for further chemical verifications in case only interaction information is known or only some of characteristic information is available. In a word, LMP can reduce cost and failure in drug development, and thus advance drug discoveries.
# Methods
## Notations
In this work, various matrices and their similarity matrices are computed by the proposed method based on the characteristic information of the biological data. We denote them as follows:
- \(\mathbf{A}\): the adjacency matrix denoted the known interactions between drugs and proteins and its entries are defined as in Eq. ([\[eq_adj_mat\]](#eq_adj_mat){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_adj_mat"}).
- \(\mathbf{X}_{D}^*\): the low-rank similarity matrix computed based on drug information in \(\mathbf{A}\), i.e., similar drugs interact with similar targets.
- \(\mathbf{X}_{T}^*\): the low-rank similarity matrix computed based on target information of \(\mathbf{A}^T\) (transpose of \(\mathbf{A}\)), i.e., similar targets is interacted by similar drugs.
- \(\mathbf{Z}_{AD}\): the score matrix obtained from the projection of \(\mathbf{A}\) onto \(\mathbf{X}_{D}^*\).
- \(\mathbf{Z}_{AT}\): the score matrix obtained from the projection of \(\mathbf{A}\) onto \(\mathbf{X}_{T}^*\).
- \(\mathbf{Z}_A\): the score matrix computed by combining \(\mathbf{Z}_{AD}\) and \(\mathbf{Z}_{AT}\).
- \(\mathbf{S}_D\): the similarity matrix of drug compound computed by SIMCOMP from the chemical structures of drugs which are obtained from KEGG LIGAND.
- \(\mathbf{X}_{SD}^*\): the low-rank similarity matrix computed by the proposed method on \(\mathbf{S}_D\).
- \(\mathbf{Z}_{D}\): the score matrix obtained by projecting \(\mathbf{A}\) on \(\mathbf{X}_{SD}^*\).
- \(\mathbf{S}_T\): the similarity matrix of protein sequences computed by a normalized Smith-Waterman score from GEGG GENES.
- \(\mathbf{X}_{ST}^*\): the low-rank similarity matrix computed by the proposed method on \(\mathbf{S}_T\).
- \(\mathbf{Z}_{T}\): the score matrix obtained by projecting \(\mathbf{A}\) on \(\mathbf{X}_{ST}^*\).
- \(\mathbf{Z}_{ADT}\): the score matrix computed by combining \(\mathbf{Z}_{A}\), \(\mathbf{Z}_{D}\) and \(\mathbf{Z}_{T}\).
## Datasets
In this work, we implement the proposed method as well as similarity-based methods on five benchmark and renown datasets namely MATADOR, enzyme, ion channel, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), and nuclear receptors. The manually annotated target and drug online resource (MATADOR) (May 2017) dataset is a free online dataset of chemical and target protein interactions. There are 13 columns in the dataset, however, we utilize only two columns, including Chemical ID and Protein ID, to construct the adjacency matrix. MATADOR dataset has no characteristic information about the drugs and targets. Enzyme, ion channel, GPCR, and nuclear receptors (May 2017) are the drug-target interaction networks for human beings. The statistics of the five datasets are presented in table [1](#table_stat){reference-type="ref" reference="table_stat"}.
[\[table_stat\]]{#table_stat label="table_stat"}
## Low-Rank Matrix Projection
In the real-world problems, many data that are lying on the high-dimensional space and full of noise normally contain hidden features which can be seen after they are projected onto the lower dimensional space and simultaneously the noise are subtracted from them. Low-rank matrix has been shown to be a powerful and suitable tool to capture the patterns in high dimensional-space and noisy data. Therefore, it is deserved to be investigated to solve DTI problem. In this section we assume that only known interactions between drugs and targets are available so we aim at learning the low-rank matrix from this interaction information. First of all, we construct the adjacency matrices of the drug-target interactions in the five datasets. Mathematically, the adjacency matrix is defined as \[\mathbf{A}_{ij}= \left\{ \begin{array}{l l l} 1, \ \ \ \textrm{if drug } i \textrm{ interacts with target } j \\ 0, \ \ \ \textrm{otherwise} \end{array}\right.. \label{eq_adj_mat}\] Then we obtain \(\mathbf{A}\in\mathbb{R}^{m\times n}\), where \(m\) is the number of drugs and \(n\) is the number of target proteins. The real data are normally far from perfect, meaning that a portion of the drug-target interactions in the real data may be incorrect or redundant, and also some other drug-target interactions may be missing from the observed data. Therefore, the adjacency matrix \(\mathbf{A}\) can be decomposed into two parts. The first part is a linear combination of \(\mathbf{A}\) with the low-rank matrix, which is essentially a projection from the noisy data \(\bf A\) into a more refined or informative and lower-dimensional space. The second part can be considered as the noise or the outliers, which is strained off from the original data \(\bf A\) and represented by a sparse matrix with most entries being zeros. The method seeks the lowest-rank matrix among all the candidates which is further utilized to construct the score matrix that estimates the likelihoods of the potential interactions.
[\[table:algoLRR\]]{#table:algoLRR label="table:algoLRR"}
[\[table_LMP\]]{#table_LMP label="table_LMP"}
## Working with Heterogeneous Data
Using only interaction dataset and ignoring the extra characteristic information of the drugs and targets is throwing away the important information. In this subsection, we show how the proposed method is capable of utilizing this characteristic information. Based on the hypothesis that similar drugs interact with similar targets and vice versus, we can utilize the two kinds of characteristic information, namely drug similarity and target similarity to infer the potential interactions. Drug similarity \(\mathbf{S}_D\) was computed by using SIMCOMP from the chemical structures of drugs which are obtained from KEGG LIGAND. On the other hand, target similarity \(\mathbf{S}_T\) is computed by using a normalized Smith-Waterman score from GEGG GENES. These two datasets are available online. Directly using these two similarity datasets makes the proposed method perform unsatisfactorily since there exist some noise inside these two datasets. Therefore, we compute the new similarity matrices which are low-rank from these two similarity matrices by the proposed method, then projecting the adjacency matrix onto these lower-dimensional spaces. There are two main properties of this low-rank matrix learning from the characteristic information. Firstly, as discussed above the noise are subtracted. Moreover, the interaction information is projected on the lower-dimensional feature space which is more informative. The low-rank similarity matrices of the characteristic information \(\mathbf{S}_D\) and \(\mathbf{S}_T\) can be computed as shown in Eq. ([\[eq_lrr\]](#eq_lrr){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_lrr"}) by replacing the adjacency matrix \(\mathbf{A}\) with \(\mathbf{S}_D\) and \(\mathbf{S}_T\), respectively. After obtaining the low-rank similarity matrices of the drug and target denoted as \(\mathbf{X}^*_{SD}\) and \(\mathbf{X}^*_{ST}\), we project the adjacency matrix \(\mathbf{A}\) onto them as shown in Eq. ([\[eq_similarity\]](#eq_similarity){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_similarity"}) and we call them the score matrices denoted as \(\mathbf{Z}_D\) and \(\mathbf{Z}_T\), respectively. Finally, we combine all these three score matrices which are \(\mathbf{Z}_A\), \(\mathbf{Z}_D\) and \(\mathbf{Z}_T\) as \[\mathbf{Z}_{ADT} = \gamma_1\mathbf{Z}_{A} +\gamma_2 \mathbf{Z}^T_{D} + \gamma_3\mathbf{Z}_{T},\] where \(\gamma_1\), \(\gamma_2\) and \(\gamma_3\) are the weighting parameters and are set to 0.5, 0.25 and 0.25, respectively. Since the known interactions are experimentally verified, the similarity matrix obtained from this information plays more important role than the other two similarity matrices. The algorithm of the proposed method is illustrated in table [3](#table_LMP){reference-type="ref" reference="table_LMP"}.
## Predicting the New Drugs and Targets
In case that there are new drugs or targets which do not have any known interactions at all, the proposed method can also be simply extended to predict their interactions. However, we need to use the characteristic information about the new drugs or new targets. On one hand, once we are given a drug with characteristic information, we wish to predict which target proteins that this drug interactions with. On the other hand, we aim at predicting the new drugs based on the known protein target by using the characteristic information of the target proteins. Consider predicting new targets, first of all, one needs to compute the low-rank similarity matrix of the given drug with others based on their characteristic information, i.e., computing \(\mathbf{X}^*_{SD}\). With the assumption that similar drugs interact with similar targets, we can predict the potential interactions based on this similarity matrix, i.e., projecting \(\mathbf{A}\) onto \(\mathbf{X}^*_{SD}\). Similarly, when a new target is given with its biological information, one can compute the low-rank similarity matrix, i.e., \(\mathbf{X}^*_{ST}\), of that protein with the others. The potentially interacted drugs with this protein are those that interact with proteins that are most similar to the given protein.
## Evaluation and Experimental Settings
We adopt a cross validation technique and two popular metrics to test the proposed method as well as previous benchmarks. We apply the 10-fold cross validation, which divides the total known interactions between the chemicals and proteins into 10 sets with approximately the same size, and then utilize 9 sets as training data and keep the remaining set as testing data. We repeat it for ten times where each set has one chance to be the testing set. In the simulation, we independently run the 10-fold cross validation for five times and report average values accordingly. We consider the two popular metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and the area under precision and recall curve (AUPR), to evaluate the performances of the proposed method and the benchmarks. ROC is the diagnostic ability of a binary classifier with regarding to different thresholds, while AUC curve displays true positive rate (sensitivity) versus false positive rate (1-specificity) at different values of thresholds. The sensitivity is the percentage of the test samples with ranks higher than a given threshold, whereas, specificity is the percentage the test samples that fall below the threshold. When there are many fewer positive elements in the testing data comparing to the total number in testing data, AUC may give overoptimistic results of the algorithms. Therefore, utilizing only AUC may mislead our conclusion. In such case, AUPR can give better evaluation, especially in biological significance. The simulations are conducted within three manners, e.g., drug-target pairs, new drugs, and new targets. In the first manner, we divide the total known interactions into 10-folds with approximately the same size. On the other hand, in the second manner we divide the total drugs into 10-folds. For the last manner, all the targets are divided into 10-folds. In each simulation, we use 9 sets as training data and keep the remaining as testing data.
## Baseline Methods
First, we compare LMP with the similarity-based methods, e.g., common neighbor index (CN), Katz index and Jaccard index, Cannistraci resource allocation (CRA) and Cannistraci Jaccard index (CJC). In this comparison, we use only the known interactions of drug and targets. The methods that utilize both interaction information and characteristic information normally outperform the methods that utilize only the known interactions. However, they cannot work with the dataset that do not have characteristic information such as MATADOR. We further compare LMP with bipartite local learning model (BLM), Laplacian regularized least squares (LapRLS) and Net Laplacian regularized least squares (NetLapRLS) which utilizes both the known interaction information and characteristic information about the drugs and targets. The first group of methods can only predict the interactions between drugs and targets, meanwhile the second group can predict the new drugs given targets or predict the new targets given drugs by using their characteristic information.
## Parameter Settings
In the proposed method, there is a free parameter \(\alpha\) that balances the weights of low-rank matrix and sparse matrix as shown in Eq. ([\[eq_lrr\]](#eq_lrr){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_lrr"}). When \(\alpha\) is set too large, the sparse norm will compress most of the entries of matrix \(\mathbf{E}\) to zeros, while if \(\alpha\) is very small, most of the entries of \(\mathbf{E}\) will be small but not zeros. In this work, we obtain the optimal value of the parameter \(\alpha\) by manually and empirically tuning it and check the accuracy according to each value of \(\alpha\). Predicting the interactions based on only the known interaction, we perform the grid search for \(\alpha\) in which one dimension is corresponding to drug similarity and another one is corresponding to target similarity. Based on the empirical simulation, \(\alpha\) for predicting the interactions based on only known interactions falls between \[0.1,0.25\]. When characteristic information is embedded, one needs to tune \(\alpha\) according to this information, e.g., the parameter \(\alpha\) falls between \[0.1,2\]. Moreover, there is only one \(\alpha\) in each case, eg., predicting the new drugs or targets. We visualize the sensitivity of \(\alpha\) corresponding to the predicted results, i.e., AUPR, on the new drugs and targets, in Fig. [\[fig_auprAlpha\]](#fig_auprAlpha){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_auprAlpha"}.
# Results
We report the performances of the proposed method and the others that use only the known interaction information in the first part of table [\[table_pre\]](#table_pre){reference-type="ref" reference="table_pre"}, meanwhile for the performances of the methods that use together interaction information and characteristic information are shown in the second part of the same table. Consider the first group of the methods. LMP outperforms the other methods on three datasets including MATADOR, GPCR, and ion channel in terms of AUC and AUPR. In term of AUPR, LMP outperforms the others in enzyme, while LMP outperforms only Katz index in enzyme in term of AUC. It is worth noting that for the small matrix or network such as nuclear receptor, the predicted results from all the methods are not stable and they are approximately the same. When the characteristic information of the drugs and targets are employed, the performances of the LMP remarkably improved as shown in the second part of table [\[table_pre\]](#table_pre){reference-type="ref" reference="table_pre"}. Since the characteristic information of the drugs and targets in MATADOR is not available, we either cannot obtain the results of this dataset. LMP outperforms the others on nuclear receptor and GPCR in term of AUC, while NetLapRLS is the best in term of AUPR on nuclear receptor. LMP perform better than the others measured by AUPR in GPCR and ion channel. LMP outperforms the others in term of AUC, while NetLapRLS produces the highest AUPR on enzyme. The predicted results on the new drugs and target proteins are illustrated in table [\[table_preTarget\]](#table_preTarget){reference-type="ref" reference="table_preTarget"} in the first and second part, respectively. All the methods produce competitive results in predicting the new drugs, while LMP outperform the others in term of AUC and AUPR on GPCR, ion channel and enzyme in predicting new targets.
# Conclusion and discussion
In this work, we have proposed a matrix-based method, namely low-rank matrix projection (LMP), to solve the DTI prediction problem. It has been shown that LMP overcomes the drawbacks of the machine learning and similarity-based methods. On one hand, LMP can work on datasets that have only known interaction information between the drugs and targets such as MATADOR. On the other hand, LMP can integrate the information about the characteristics of the drugs and targets to improve the predicted results. Moreover, the proposed method can also effectively deal with the new drugs and targets that do not have any known interaction at all by utilizing only some characteristic information of the drugs or targets. In LMP, the low-rank matrix plays a very important role in making the data homogenous, meanwhile the sparse matrix captures the noise or outliers in the data. By decomposing the original data into a clean (a linear combination of low-rank matrix and the adjacency matrix) and noise (sparse matrix) parts, we can obtain a clean data to predict the interactions between drugs and target proteins. The disadvantage of LMP is that we need to empirically tune \(\alpha\) and check the accuracy corresponding to each value of \(\alpha\). Until now, designing the effective method to estimate the optimal value of this parameter is still an open question. Moreover, LMP may not perform well with small matrix, e.g., nuclear receptor, since the information is very limited for matrix decomposition. LMP is an alternative, effective and efficient *in silico* tool for predicting the drug-target interactions. It can help drug development and drug reposition. In this paper, LMP aims at learning the low-rank similarity matrices from the known drug-target interaction information and similarity matrices of the drugs and targets. We believe that the proposed method can also be applied to learn other high-dimensional biological data such as drug compound, chemical structures, and so on, and we leave these problems to the future work. | {'timestamp': '2018-05-04T02:05:15', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01876', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01876'} |
# Introduction {#sec:intro}
Titan is the second largest moon in the Solar System (radius \(R_T\) = 2576 km) and possesses a dense extended atmosphere principally composed of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}96% molecular nitrogen, \(<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}4% methane, and \(<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1% hydrogen. Aerosol-type particles envelop the moon in a thick organic photochemical haze, a phenomenon also present at Pluto, Triton, the Archean Earth and likely also methane rich extra-solar planets. The production mechanisms and composition of these naturally occurring organic compounds are however far from understood. The Cassini spacecraft has sampled the ionised regions of Titan's upper atmosphere down to altitudes of \(<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}900 km in-situ and observed positively charged ions (cations) extending up to nearly 1000 u/q and, surprisingly, negatively charged ions (anions) and aerosol precursors extending up to \(13,800\) u/q. The cations were detected at nearly all masses up to 100 u with over 50 species identified in this range. At \(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100 u, evidence for carbon-based aromatic compounds has been reported, although unique identifications were not possible. The anions and larger negatively charged molecules were obtained at a lower resolution and classified into broad mass groupings of 12-30, 30-55, 55-90, 90-125, 125-195, 195-625, and 625\(+\) u/q with the higher masses observed at lower altitudes and higher latitudes. In the deep ionosphere below \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1000 km the anion/aerosol precursor charge density was observed to exceed that of the electrons resulting in an ion-ion (dusty) plasma. A number of studies have modelled the cation and neutral chemistry occurring in Titan's ionosphere at \(<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100 u/q, but only two studies have attempted to model the anion chemistry. These focussed on low mass species of \(<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}75 \(\textrm{u}\) and in particular inferred the presence of the C\(_{n-1}\)N\(^-\) and C\(_{n}\)H\(^-\) anions, where n=2-6. These carbon chain anions have all also been detected in dark molecular clouds, prestellar cores or protostellar envelopes where their high reactivity acts as a catalyst for the formation of larger organic molecules. Chemical models of these environments also predict even larger anions containing up to 23 carbon atoms. At Titan, chemical schemes are only beginning to provide theories as to how the larger species can be produced. Stochastic charging models provide some explanation for how species of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100 u could be ionised and aggregate to form \(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10,000 u molecules but only a few studies have looked at precise chemical routes for producing molecules \(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100 u. demonstrate how cations of \(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100 u are likely formed from smaller hydrocarbon compounds through ion-molecule growth processes and provided a mechanistic analysis of possible routes from small to large cations of \(<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}250 u/q. The latter was based upon Olah's three-membered Hückel aromatic rings, and suggest the presence of several carbocations and their corresponding carbanions. This letter provides analysis of the anion and aerosol precuror dataset using a forward model of the Cassini Plasma Spectrometer (CAPS) Electron Spectrometer (ELS) instrument response function to these species. Statistical evidence for the low mass carbon chain anions, CN\(^-\)/C\(_2H^-\) and C\(_3\)N\(^-\)/C\(_4\)H\(^-\) is presented as well as constraints on intermediary anions in the range of 50-200 u/q. The role of these species is then examined with respect to the growth of larger molecules with decreasing altitude.
# Methodology {#sec:ps1_data}
The results presented in this letter are derived from CAPS-ELS observations obtained during the T16, T18, T32, T40 and T48 encounters. These include measurements across Titan's sunlit (T16 ingress, T18, T32 ingress, T40, T48) and anti-sunlit (T16 egress & T32 egress) hemispheres, a variety of latitudes and also when Titan was immersed directly within the solar wind (T32). Further information on the geometry and ambient conditions of the Titan encounters can be found in. The CAPS-ELS is a top-hat electrostatic-analyser sensitive to negatively charged particles in the 0.6-28,000 eV range. Anions can be identified within the ELS three-dimensional velocity distribution due to being highly super-sonic in the spacecraft frame and preferentially registering in anodes aligned with the spacecraft velocity vector. Thus as Cassini travels through Titan's ionosphere, the ELS observes an anion mass/charge spectrum, \[\label{eq1} \frac{m}{q}=\frac{2}{qv_{sc}^2}\left(E_{ELS}-\phi_{sc}\right)\] where \(E_{ELS}\) is the nominal acceptance energy, \(v_{sc}\) is the spacecraft velocity relative to Titan and \(\phi_{sc}\) is the ELS spacecraft potential shift applied in accordance with Liouville's theorem. To isolate the anion detections, the count rates are taken from each scan across the ram direction and the isotropically observed electrons on non-ram pointing anodes averaged and subtracted. The count rate \(R_C\), can then be related to the number density, \(n_{ni}\), using the ion current approximation, \[\label{eq2} n_{ni}=\frac{R_c}{ v_{sc} \hspace{0.5mm} A_F \hspace{0.5mm} \varepsilon_{} },\] where \(A_F = 0.33~\textrm{cm}^2\) is the effective area of acceptance, and \(\varepsilon_{}\) is the Microchannel Plate (MCP) anion detection efficiency function which is energy dependent. A value of \(\varepsilon_{}=0.05\) was used in previous studies based upon the extensive study by which remains the best estimate for the larger species. Studies have however shown that at lower energies this could be significantly larger for negatively charged molecules where electron multiplication is increasingly dependent on potential as well as kinetic emission processes. Further analysis of the density uncertainties will be addressed by Wellbrock et al. (manuscript in preparation) and in this study we do not implement a new value. The ELS energy bins are quasi-logarithmically spaced to match the energy resolution and overlap at FWHM which results in a nominal electron or anion distribution registering counts across multiple energy bins. To take this into account we forward model the ELS response to negative ions. The ELS \(\Delta E/E\) resolution can be represented using a normalised Gaussian of the form \[\label{eq3} f(E) = R_{nc} \exp \left(-\frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{E-E_0}{E_W} \right )^2 \right )\] where \(E_0\) is the center of the distribution, \(E_W\) is the width and \(R_{nc}\) is the normalised count rate. Here, \(E_W\) corresponds to \(\Delta E/E=16.7\%\) in the case of a single anion distribution but can be larger in the case of multiple overlapping distributions. The thermal energy spread of the anions is approximated by a drifting Maxwellian expressed in count rates, \[\label{eq4} g(E)=\frac{2nE^2G}{\sqrt{m}}\left(\frac{1}{2 \pi kT} \right)^{\frac{3}{2}} \exp \left(-\frac{(E-E_0)}{kT}\right),\] as adapted from, where \(T\) is the ion temperature in Titan's ionosphere and \(G\) the geometric factor, \[\label{eq5} G=A_F \frac{\Delta E}{E} \varepsilon,\] which is derived under the assumption that the negative ion current fills the ELS aperture. The ion temperature in Titan's ionosphere has been determined to be significantly less than the \(\Delta E/E\) instrument sensitivity and tests with or without this thermal contribution produced similar results. In this study it is therefore held constant at \(kT = 0.02\) eV (\(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}150K) and included for completeness. The ELS response function and the anion distribution can then be convolved, \[\label{eq6} h(E)= f(E) \ast g(E),\] and the resulting function modelled to fit the observed data using a \({\chi}^2\) minimisation routine. Of further mention is that the spacecraft surfaces charge to negative values in Titan's relatively dense ionosphere and the various surfaces will also charge to different potentials based upon variations in material conductivities and incident electron and ion currents. This results in the exact potential correction, \(\phi_{sc}\), also being unknown and the centers of the fitted distributions are therefore established relative to one another. Errors in the observed count rates are taken as
\[\label{eq7} \sigma = \sigma_p + \sigma_{std}\] where \(\sigma_{p}\) corresponds to the Poisson counting statistics and \(\sigma_{std}\) corresponds to the standard deviation of counts on non-ram oriented anodes. This is used as a measure of electron anisotropies and inter-anode scaling uncertainties, introduced when isolating the anion detections.
# Species identification {#sec:Carbon chain identification}
Figure [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"} shows the anion mass/charge spectrum measured at various altitudes during T40. At higher altitudes (\(>1300\) km) the larger \(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100 u/q species are absent and at the highest altitudes it is difficult to identify anions due to decreased densities. As Cassini descends, clear detections appear at \(<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}200 u/q and the larger \(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}200 u/q distribution starts to grow below \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1250 km. The five resolved clustered detections in the spectra are hereafter referred to as peaks 1-5 and fall within the range of mass groups 1-5 as described by. Figure [\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"} also shows anion spectra obtained during encounters T16, T18, T32 and T48. The fitting procedure applied to peaks 1 and 2 finds the center of the primary two peaks to be separated by \(23-24.3\) u/q in all encounters, see Table [\[table1\]](#table1){reference-type="ref" reference="table1"}. Chemical models for Titan's atmosphere predict efficient production of C\(_n\)H\(^-\) and C\(_{n-1}\)N\(^-\) to result from dissociative electron attachment to, or de-protonation of, parent neutral species C\(_n\)H\(_2\) and HC\(_{n-1}\)N. For example, CN\(^-\) and C\(_3\)N\(^-\) are produced by \[\label{eq8} {HCN + e^-\rightarrow H + CN^-},\] \[\label{eq9} HC_3N + CN^- \rightarrow HCN + C_3N^-,\] which proceeds rapidly due to abundant HCN and HC\(_3\)N. A similar reaction sequence exists for hydrocarbons where C\(_2\)H\(^-\) and C\(_4\)H\(^-\) are produced by \[\label{eq10} {C_2H_2 + e^-\rightarrow H + C_2H^-,}\] \[\label{eq11} {C_4H_2 + C_2H^-\rightarrow C_2H_2 + C_4H^-.}\] | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:03:25', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01610', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01610'} |
null | null |
# Introduction {#sec:intro}
In the past two decades, a variety of cosmological data has been pointing to the conclusion that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating at present. The favored explanation, the \(\Lambda\)CDM model, constitutes the standard cosmological paradigm. In this model, \(\Lambda\) is the cosmological constant, which drives the accelerated expansion, and cold dark matter (CDM) forms the large-scale structures in the Universe. However, the model suffers from theoretical and conceptual issues, such as the cosmological constant and coincidence problems, as well as observational challenges, such as the description of small-scale cosmological structures, see for a review. For these reasons, a long list of alternatives have been explored, mainly in the form of dynamical dark energy (DE) or modifications of general relativity (see for reviews). Very different alternatives, also compliant with some of the cosmological data, have been proposed such as models where the acceleration effects are explained by quantum effects, or also the averaging approach to cosmology [@Smale:2011]. Here we will consider a well-studied variation of \(\Lambda\)CDM: the unified dark fluid approach, also known as quartessence, sometimes as unified dark energy, but more usually known as unified dark matter (UDM)[^1]. A plethora of UDM models have been proposed (see for a review) after the pioneering introduction of the Chaplygin gas. The unification of dark matter and dark energy is an interesting approach that assumes the existence of a single fluid capable of accounting for both the accelerated expansion at late times and the large-scale structure formation at early times, due to the evolution of its equation of state (EOS) and speed of sound. In principle this is more efficient than postulating two different fluids and equally valid, since the nature of the fluids is still elusive. It also has the advantage of evading, by definition, the coincidence problem. These models substantially alleviate as well the tension between some recent high and low redshift measurements. A serious issue in most UDM models is the presence of an effective speed of sound that can be very different from zero during the cosmological evolution. This prevents the dark fluid to cluster below a thresholding scale (the Jeans scale). In addition, the evolution of the gravitational potential may also give rise to a strong signature in the integrated Sachs Wolfe (ISW) effect. It is therefore crucial to make sure that the single dark fluid is able to cluster and create the observed cosmic structures as well as reproducing the well-known pattern of cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies. However, for the majority of UDM models in the literature, these requirements, together with the necessity of having a background evolution that complies with observations, lead to a severe fine-tuning of the parameters, to the point that the models become almost indistinguishable from \(\Lambda\)CDM and are thus less interesting. The problem of the lack of clustering, or production of oscillations, can be avoided with a technique introduced in. In particular, the dark fluid is a scalar field, \(\varphi\), with a noncanonical kinetic term, i.e., a term \(f(\dot\varphi^2)\) instead of the standard \(\dot\varphi^2/2\). In this way it was possible to build a UDM model with a small effective sound speed that allows structure formation and has a weak ISW effect, being compliant with weak lensing data. This model has, however, the same background evolution as \(\Lambda\)CDM. A more recent alternative are the so-called UDM models with fast transition where, during a short period, the effective speed of sound can be large, but is otherwise zero. This produces a fast transition between a CDM-like era, with an Einstein-de Sitter evolution, and an accelerated DE-like era, and allows for structure formation. In addition, these models are not forced by construction to have the same background evolution as \(\Lambda\)CDM and are free from the problem of fine-tuning of the parameters that plagues many UDM models. The thermodynamics of a UDM model with fast transition was explored in. The dynamics of UDM models with fast transition can be prescribed in three different ways: starting from either the EOS \(w\), the pressure \(p\) or the energy density \(\rho\). The first UDM model with fast transition was introduced in and prescribed the evolution of \(p\). The pressure and energy density were related by a barotropic EOS, \(p=p(\rho)\) and the perturbations were adiabatic. A second UDM model with fast transition was presented in and was built from a k-essence scalar field Lagrangian (see also ). This model also prescribed \(p\) but, differently from the first one, since it is based on a scalar field the perturbations are naturally nonadiabatic, allowing for a small Jeans length even when the speed of sound is non-negligible. The model also contains a future attractor that acts as an effective cosmological constant[^2], \(\rho_{\infty}\); i.e., an asymptotic limit \(w =-1\) is built in. A third UDM model with fast transition was proposed in. This is a phenomenological model, with the dynamics prescribed through the fluid density \(\rho\), and it has adiabatic perturbations. Models with a fast transition might also be a step towards a unified description of dark matter, dark energy and inflation but, regardless of that possibility, they are considered among the most promising UDM models. Even though they are built with the goal of enabling structure formation, it is also important to test them at the background level since they may have a background evolution quite distinct from \(\Lambda\)CDM. In particular, such tests will constrain the rapidity of the transition and may already give an indication whether the allowed rapidity range favors structure formation. The phenomenological UDM model, and variations of it, were recently constrained at background level in. In the present work, we apply supernova, galaxy clustering and CMB data to test the scalar field UDM model of, constraining its parameters and making a statistical model comparison with both \(\Lambda\)CDM and the phenomenological UDM model of tested in. In the rest of the paper, we present in Sec. [2](#sec:UDMmodelfast){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:UDMmodelfast"} the UDM model that will be tested in Sec. [4](#sec:results){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:results"} using the data and methods described in Sec. [3](#sec:constraints){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:constraints"}. We conclude with a summary and some remarks in Sec. [5](#sec:concl){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:concl"}.
# The UDM model {#sec:UDMmodelfast}
We consider the scalar field UDM model proposed in, where the evolution of the pressure has the following form: \[\label{ptanh} p(a) =-\rho_\infty \left\{\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}\tanh\left[\frac{\beta}{3} \left(a^3-a_{\rm t}^3\right)\right]\right\}\.\] This model allows for a fast transition in the pressure evolution, since for large values of \(\beta\) the \(\tanh\) function tends to a step function. The transition occurs at a scale factor \(a_t\), with rapidity parameterized by \(\beta\), while \(\rho_\infty\) parameterizes the pressure amplitude. The fluid goes from an Einstein-de Sitter DM era (\(p=0\) at early times), through \(p(a_t)=-\rho_\infty/2\) at transition, to a DE era at late times (with \(p\) reaching \(-\rho_\infty\) the sooner for faster transitions). Considering a Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) background metric (and a frame with proper time coinciding with the cosmic time), the density can be derived from the pressure using the energy conservation equation \[\label{coneq} \dot{\rho} =-3H\left(\rho + p\right)=-3H\rho\left(1 + w\right)\,,\] where \(w = p/\rho\) is the EOS and the dot means differentiation with respect to time. The density is obtained from the pressure by integrating Eq. ([\[coneq\]](#coneq){reference-type="ref" reference="coneq"}): \[\label{tanh} \rho(a) = \rho_\infty \left\{\frac{1}{2}+\frac{3}{2\beta}a^{-3}\ln\left(\cosh\left[\frac{\beta}{3} \left(a^3-a_{\rm t}^3\right)\right]\right)\right\} + \rho_{c0} a^{-3}\.\] The integration introduces another constant. It is usual to choose it as the amplitude of a \"CDM sector of the UDM\": \(\rho_{c0}\), defined at \(a=1\). Note that the density does not have a fast transition, since the \(\ln(\cosh)\) function is not a step function. The density decreases smoothly from its maximum amplitude at \(a=0\), through \(\rho(a_t) =(\rho_{c0}a_t^{-3}+\rho_\infty)\) at transition, to \(\rho_\infty\) when \(a \rightarrow \infty\). Note also that for fast transitions (large \(\beta\)) and after the transition, \(\tanh \sim 1\) and \(\ln[\cosh(x)]/x \sim 1\), and thus \(p \sim-\rho_\infty\) and \(w \sim-\rho_\infty / (\rho_\infty + \rho_{c0})\). This means that fastest models become degenerate and are more similar to \(\Lambda\)CDM than the slower ones (with the exception of the singular case \(\beta=0\)). The UDM model contain thus four parameters: \(\rho_{c0}\), \(\rho_\infty\), \(\beta\) and \(a_t\). With this choice of parameters, the density is written as the sum of three parts: the CDM-like term \(\rho_c(a)=\rho_{c0} a^{-3}\), a constant term \(\rho(a)=\rho_\infty / 2\) and the \(\ln\cosh\) term, with the latter two defining a "dark energy sector". To compare UDM models with \(\Lambda\)CDM, it is useful to define today's densities for these two sectors. Introducing the critical density today, \(\rho_{\rm cr}=3H_0^{2}\), we define the two dimensionless density parameters: \[\Omega_c = \frac{\rho_{c0}}{3H_0^2}\] and \[\label{omegaDEdef} \Omega_{DE}=\frac{\rho_\infty}{3H_0^2} \left\{\frac{1}{2}+\frac{3}{2\beta}\ln\left(\cosh\left[\frac{\beta}{3} \left(1-a_{\rm t}^3\right)\right] \right) \right\}\.\] All the background probes we will use in the likelihood analysis depend on the Hubble function \[\label{friedman-2} E^2(a)=H^2/H_0^2=\Omega_{r} a^{-4}+ \Omega_{b} a^{-3}+ \Omega_{\rm UDM}(a)\,,\] where \(\Omega_b\) and \(\Omega_r=2.49\times10^{-5}h^{-2}\) are the baryonic matter and radiation densities, respectively, and \[\label{omegaUDM} \Omega_{\rm UDM}(a)=\Omega_{c}a^{-3}+\Omega_{DE}\left\{ \frac{1}{2}+\frac{3}{2\beta}a^{-3}\ln\left\{\cosh\left[\frac{\beta}{3} \left(a^3-a_{\rm t}^3\right)\right] \right\} \right\}\;.\] The four parameters \(\Omega_{DE}\), \(\Omega_c\), \(\beta\) and \(a_t\) are not all independent. Indeed, applying Friedmann's equation, \(\sum_i\Omega_i =1\), we can write \[\label{omegaDE} \Omega_{DE}=\frac{1-\Omega_{r}-\Omega_{b}-\Omega_{c}}{ \frac{1}{2}+\frac{3}{2\beta}\ln\left\{\cosh\left[\frac{\beta}{3} \left(1-a_{\rm t}^3\right)\right] \right\} }.\] The definition of two sectors allows the introduction of an EOS of the dark energy sector, \[\label{wDE} w_{\rm DE}(a)=\frac{p(a)}{\rho(a)-\rho_{\rm c0}a^{-3}}\;,\] in addition to the EOS \(w(a)=p(a)/\rho(a)\). We finally note that an explicit analytical Lagrangian can be written for this model, since the general Lagrangian for a UDM scalar field \(\varphi\), within the framework of k-essence, is \[L= L_G+ L_\varphi=\frac{1}{16\pi G}R+ L_\varphi(\varphi,X),\] where \(X\) is the kinetic term and the pressure can be identified with the term \(p=L_\varphi(\varphi,X)\).
# Methodology {#sec:constraints}
We test the model with a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) exploration of the parameter space, combining various probes of the expansion history of the Universe: luminosity distances to type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillation scale parameter, Alcock-Paczynski distortion parameter, and include CMB distance priors. The various data sets are uncorrelated and thus the total \(\chi^2\) used in the analysis is simply the sum \[\chi^2 = \chi^{2}_{CMB} + \chi^{2}_{BAO} + \chi^{2}_{SN}\;.\]
## SNe Ia data
As in the previous analysis, we use the Union2.1 compilation , which provides not only the distance modulus \(\mu(z_i)\) for each SN, but also the full statistical plus systematics covariance matrix. The data set consists of \(580\) type Ia supernovae with redshifts in the interval \(0.015 < z < 1.414\). The cosmological model is tested through the dimensionless luminosity distance \[d_L(z) = (1+z) \int_0^z \frac{dz'}{E(z')}\,,\] which depends on the dimensionless Hubble function \(E(z)\) and is directly related to the observable: the distance modulus \[\mu(z) = 5 \log_{10} d_L(z) + \mu_{0} \;.\] This relation includes an additive nuisance parameter, \(\mu_{0}\), involving the values of the speed of light \(c\), Hubble constant \(H_{0}\), and SNe Ia absolute magnitudes. The likelihood is assumed to be Gaussian and is defined as \[\chi^2_{SN}=\textbf{X}_{SN}^T \cdot \textbf{C}_{SN}^{-1} \cdot \textbf{X}_{SN} \,,\] where \(\textbf{X}_{SN}\) is the difference vector with elements \(X_{iSN}=\mu_{\rm model}(z_{i})-\mu_{\rm obs}(z_{i})\) and \(\textbf{C}_{SN}\) is the data covariance matrix. We analytically marginalize over the additive parameter \(\mu_0\), as an alternative to including it in the MCMC parameter space. The resulting \(\chi^2\) is given by \[\chi^2_{SN} = a + \log \frac{d}{2 \pi }-\frac{b^2}{d} \,;\] where \(a \equiv \textbf{X}_{SN}^{T} \cdot \textbf{C}_{SN}^{-1} \cdot \textbf{X}_{SN}\), \(b \equiv \textbf{X}_{SN}^{T} \cdot \textbf{C}_{SN} ^{-1} \cdot \bf{1}\), and \(d \equiv {\bf 1}^{T} \cdot \textbf{C}_{SN}^{-1} \cdot \bf{1}\), with \(\bf{1}\) being the identity matrix.
## Baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data
Unlike the previous analysis, we will now use the baryon acoustic oscillation scale parameter \(A(z)\) and the Alcock-Paczynski distortion parameter \(F(z)\) provided by the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey, as the BAO observables. They are defined as \[\begin{aligned}
A(z) & \equiv & 100 D_V(z) \sqrt{\Omega_m h^2} /cz \,, \\ F (z) & \equiv & (1+z) D_A(z) H(z)/c \,, \end{aligned}\] probing the angular-diameter distance \[D_A(z) = \frac{c}{(1+z)} \int^z_0 \frac{dz'}{H(z')}\] and the volume-averaged distance \[D_V (z) = \left[ (1+z)^2 D_A(z)^2 \frac{c z}{H(z)} \right]^{1/3} \,.\] WiggleZ measured these observables in three overlapping redshift bins, with effective redshifts \((z_{1}, \, z_{2}, \, z_{3}) = (0.44, \, 0.60, \, 0.73)\). The data values are \[\begin{aligned}
\textbf{X}_{obs} &=& (A_1, A_2, A_3, F_1, F_2, F_3) \\ &=& (0.474, 0.442, 0.424, 0.482, 0.650, 0.865) \end{aligned}\] with correlated errors described by the covariance matrix \[\begin{aligned}
\textbf{C}_{BAO}=10^{-3} \times \left( \begin{array}{cccccc} 1.156 & 0.211 & 0.0 & 0.400 & 0.234 & 0.0 \\ 0.211 & 0.400 & 0.189 & 0.118 & 0.276 & 0.336 \\ 0.0 & 0.189 & 0.441 & 0.0 & 0.167 & 0.399 \\ 0.400 & 0.118 & 0.0 & 2.401 & 1.350 & 0.0 \\ 0.234 & 0.276 & 0.167 & 1.350 & 2.809 & 1.934 \\ 0.0 & 0.336 & 0.399 & 0.0 & 1.934 & 5.329 \\ \end{array} \right) \end{aligned}\] The BAO contribution to the total \(\chi^2\) is \[\chi^2_{BAO} = \textbf{X}_{BAO}^T \cdot \textbf{C}_{BAO}^{-1} \cdot \textbf{X}_{BAO}\] where \(\textbf{X}_{BAO} = (\textbf{X}_{obs}-\textbf{X}_{mod} )\) is the difference vector.
## Priors
In order to reduce the volume of the parameter space in the MCMC analysis, it is useful to include the so-called distance priors in our analysis. These are priors on the CMB shift parameters, geometrical quantities that effectively summarize the CMB data, since they capture the degeneracies between the parameters that determine the CMB power spectrum . The first shift parameter is a dimensionless distance to the photon-decoupling surface \[R \equiv \sqrt{\Omega_m H^2_0} \,\frac{r(z_*)}{c} \;,\] defined from the comoving distance to the photon-decoupling surface \[r(z_*) = c\,\int_0^{z_*} \frac{dz'}{H(z')}\.\] The redshift of the photon-decoupling surface may be computed from a fitting formula \[z_{*}= 1048 \left[ 1+0.00124(\Omega_b h^2)^{-0.738} \right] \left[ 1 + g_1 (\Omega_m h^2)^{g_2} \right],\] where \(g_1\) and \(g_2\) are functions of the physical baryon density. The second shift parameter is a dimensionless size of the sound horizon at the photon-decoupling epoch, i.e., the angular scale of the sound horizon at the photon-decoupling epoch \[l_a \equiv \pi \frac{r(z_*)}{r_s(z_*)} \;,\] defined from the comoving sound horizon \[\begin{aligned}
r_s(z_*) &=& \int_0^{a_*} \frac{da'}{a'^2} \frac{c_s}{H(a')} , \end{aligned}\] where the sound speed \(c_s\) depends on the physical baryon density and the temperature of the CMB. We take \(T_{CMB}=2.725\) K. The distance prior we use is the Gaussian fit to the joint probability density function of \(R\) and \(l_a\) presented in and derived from *Planck* first release data and *WMAP* 7 and *WMAP9* temperature and polarization data. Since the shift parameters correlate with the physical baryon density \(\Omega_b h^2\) the prior also includes the baryon density and it is a three-dimensional Gaussian with mean \[\left(\langle l_a \rangle, \langle R \rangle, \langle \Omega_b h^2 \rangle\right) = (301.57, 1.7407, 0.02228)\,\] and covariance \[\begin{aligned}
\label{Vcmb} \textbf{C}_{CMB} = 10^{-2} \times \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 3.24 & 0.08883 &-0.0022869\\ 0.08883 & 0.008836 &-1.953\times 10^{-4}\\ -0.0022869 &-1.953 \times 10^{-4} & 9.\times 10^{-6}\\ \end{array} \right) \;. \end{aligned}\] The CMB data contribution to the total \(\chi^2\) is thus \[\chi^2_{CMB} = \textbf{X}_{CMB}^T \cdot \textbf{C}_{CMB}^{-1} \cdot \textbf{X}_{CMB} \;,\] where the three-dimensional difference vector between model and observations is \[\begin{aligned}
\label{data-vector} \textbf{X}_{CMB} = \left( \begin{array}{c} l_a-\langle l_a \rangle \\ R-\langle R \rangle \\ \Omega_b h^2-\langle \Omega_b h^2 \rangle \end{array} \right) \;. \end{aligned}\] Besides the distance priors, we also include some broad and flat conditions: the dark matter density must be positive \(0<\Omega_{c}<1\); the baryonic matter density must be positive and smaller than the dark matter density \(0 < \Omega_b < \Omega_{c}\); the Hubble function must be positive for all values of the scale factor \(a\), \(E(a) > 0\); and \(0 < a_t < 1\) because we want the transition to actually have happened. Finally, the Hubble constant \(H_0\) is analytically marginalized in the SN likelihood and is left as a free parameter, with a broad flat prior, in the BAO and CMB likelihoods.
# Analysis and Results {#sec:results}
We ran a set of Markov chains on the five-dimensional parameter space \((h, \Omega_c, \Omega_b, a_t, \beta)\), using the following three-step procedure. We start by running a short preliminary chain of around 20 000 iterations in order to find the region of maximum probability density. Then we make a second run for around 50 000 iterations to find a tentative covariance matrix. Finally, we start the final chain, using the previously found covariance matrix as a proposal step. The final chain has around 200 000 points and we assess its convergence using the ratio of variances proposed in. Differently from the more standard Gelman and Rubin ratio of variances that compare parallel chains, the convergence ratio of uses only one chain. It is based on a spectral analysis of the single MCMC chain and in order to perform the test we compute the power spectrum of the chain on 1000 Fourier modes. Besides the UDM scenario, we also ran an MCMC for the \(\Lambda\)CDM scenario. Figure [\[fig:UDM\]](#fig:UDM){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:UDM"} shows the posterior probabilities for each parameter of the UDM and \(\Lambda\)CDM models, along with 1-and 2-\(\sigma\) two-dimensional confidence regions. Table [1](#table-UDM){reference-type="ref" reference="table-UDM"} gives the corresponding median and marginalized 1-\(\sigma\) interval for each chain parameter and some derived parameters.
The constraints on the three standard parameters are similar in the two models. The probability contours of the Hubble parameter vs densities show the usual anti-correlations that arise because Hubble function and distance measurements probe physical densities \(\Omega_ih^2\). The main new feature is a slight correlation between the scale factor of transition \(a_t\) and \(\Omega_c\), especially for higher values of \(a_t\) (and a corresponding anti-correlation with \(h\)). This degeneracy broadens the \(\Omega_c\) contours, being responsible for the decrease of precision in the \(\Omega_c\) estimate quoted in Table [1](#table-UDM){reference-type="ref" reference="table-UDM"}. This differs from the behavior found in the analysis of the phenomenological UDM models, where the constraint on \(\Omega_c\) was found to be stronger than in the \(\Lambda\)CDM model, even though the evidence was not conclusive in favor of that UDM model. For model comparison purposes, we start by noticing in Table [2](#table-comp){reference-type="ref" reference="table-comp"} that the UDM best fit has a lower \(\chi^2\) value than the one found in the \(\Lambda\)CDM analysis. This may be due to overfitting, and indeed the best-fit reduced \(\chi^2\) is larger than for the \(\Lambda\)CDM case. A more robust way to compare the models is through the ratio of the model evidences, i.e., the Bayes factor. We compute the evidence with an implementation of the nested sampling algorithm of. In particular, we use \(10^3\) sample points, chosen randomly, and compute the evidence in up to \(10^4\) steps. We repeat the procedure 100 times, varying the sample points, and quote the average evidence from the 100 realizations. We obtain a Bayes factor very close to 0, and thus the model comparison is highly inconclusive, according to Jeffreys' scale.
With a Bayes factor so close to 0, we decided to investigate if the behavior would be any different when using approximate evidence measures, namely information criteria. The Bayesian information criterion (BIC) is defined as \[{\rm BIC} =-2\ln{\rm L_{max}} + k \ln{N}.\] Since the number of data points used, \(N\), was the same for the two models, BIC directly penalizes the lower minimum \(\chi^2\) of UDM with the higher number of free parameters \(k\). For the deviance information criterion (DIC), we followed and computed \[{\rm DIC} = 2\left<\chi^2\right>-\chi^2_{\rm \min},\] where the average \(\chi^2\) were computed from the chains and not with the nested sampling code. The results are consistent with the comparison of evidence in that both information criteria assign a weak but inconclusive preference to \(\Lambda\)CDM. We are also interested in comparing the stronger motivated scalar field UDM model with the phenomenological one. For that purpose we made a new analysis of the latter, testing it with the same set of data used in our present analysis. The results from this second model comparison analysis are also summarized in Table [2](#table-comp){reference-type="ref" reference="table-comp"}. Model comparison between the two UDM models is more direct, since both have the same number of parameters and data points. Therefore, BIC reduces to a measure of the best fit, which is slightly in favor of the scalar field model. It is interesting to note that even though the scalar field model shows a better best fit \(\chi^2\), it has a worse \(\chi^2\) behavior on average and consequently a lower DIC value and evidence. Again, the analysis does not favor one model over the other, with a weak but inconclusive preference for the phenomenological model. We can also look at the dark energy sector of the UDM model. A DE density may be defined as in Eq. ([\[omegaDEdef\]](#omegaDEdef){reference-type="ref" reference="omegaDEdef"}) and its value computed from Eq. ([\[omegaDE\]](#omegaDE){reference-type="ref" reference="omegaDE"}) as a function of all the other parameters. The corresponding EOS is dynamical and can be computed from Eq. ([\[wDE\]](#wDE){reference-type="ref" reference="wDE"}). The constraints on \(\Omega_{\rm DE}\) and \(w_{\rm DE}(a=1)\), derived from the MCMC chains, are shown in Table [1](#table-UDM){reference-type="ref" reference="table-UDM"}. The evolution of \(w_{\rm DE}\) for the best-fit parameter values is shown in Fig. [\[fig:w\]](#fig:w){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:w"}, together with its 1-\(\sigma\) variation. Notice that even though \(w_{DE}\) is phantom after the fast transition, approaching \(w_{DE} \sim-1\) today from the negative side, the UDM fluid does not violate the null energy condition because its EOS, also shown in Fig. [\[fig:w\]](#fig:w){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:w"}, does not cross the phantom divide. We have thus a UDM model with fast transition that is viable given background data. Let us analyze now the behavior of its core parameters: the scale factor at the transition, \(a_t\), and the rapidity of transition, \(\beta\). Their constraints, also shown in Fig. [\[fig:UDM\]](#fig:UDM){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:UDM"} and Table [1](#table-UDM){reference-type="ref" reference="table-UDM"}, are weak. The 1-\(\sigma\) interval for the transition redshift ranges from \(z\sim 2\) to \(z\sim 13\), while \(\beta\) does not show a correlation with the other parameters. The posterior probability of \(\beta\) shows a peaked structure. Looking in more detail into the likelihood values, we see the likelihood is essentially flat for \(\beta > 1000\). The peaks in the \(\beta\) posterior indicate the chain is not yet converged for this parameter, meaning there was not enough time to sample the unbound flat distribution and the chain remained occasionally stuck in some positions of the flat distribution. We have thus found that \(\beta\) is unbound from above, which reflects the fact that for \(\beta > \sim 1000\) the Hubble function is essentially identical for all \(\beta\) values. On the other hand, \(\beta\) is bound from below, we do not impose a \(\beta > 0\) prior in the analysis. These considerations led us to probe the low \(\beta\) limit with better resolution. For this, we ran new chains considering only the range \(\beta<100\). Given the low level of correlation with other parameters, we keep the density parameters fixed at the best-fit values, varying only \(\beta\) and \(a_t\). The scale factor at the transition must be kept free, since it is coupled with \(\beta\) in the evolution of pressure and density, Eqs. ([\[ptanh\]](#ptanh){reference-type="ref" reference="ptanh"}) and ([\[tanh\]](#tanh){reference-type="ref" reference="tanh"}), even though a degeneracy with \(\beta\) does not show in Fig. [\[fig:UDM\]](#fig:UDM){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:UDM"}. Notice also that this setup will artificially tighten the \(a_t\) constraint due to its correlation with \(\Omega_c\). We also ran separate chains for each data set and show the results in Fig. [\[fig:UDM-bgap\]](#fig:UDM-bgap){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:UDM-bgap"}. We see now a sharp peak in the posterior of \(\beta\) at \(\beta=0\) that had not been picked up before. This point is basically a singularity in the space of UDM parameters. Indeed, in the \(\beta=0\) limit, Eq. ([\[omegaUDM\]](#omegaUDM){reference-type="ref" reference="omegaUDM"}) no longer presents a transition and the model reduces to \(\Lambda\)CDM, which explains its high likelihood. No transition, also means that the value of \(a_t\) is meaningless, which explains the very narrow horizontal contour seen in the contour plot at \(\beta=0\). As \(\beta\) increases, the Hubble function starts to deviate from \(\Lambda\)CDM, until \(\beta \sim 15\), and afterwards it approaches it again. This explains the dip in the \(\beta\) posterior seen in all data sets. This effect is especially dramatic for the CMB shift parameters, which are able to reject the range \(\beta < 40\). Regarding \(a_t\), the noisy structure seen in its posterior corresponds to the \(\beta=0\) solution, while the rest of the probability volume lies along a well-defined degeneracy in the \((\beta, a_t)\) plane. Indeed, in this regime of low \(\beta\) the data is able to pick up the degeneracy that arises from the fact that a slower transition needs to occur earlier in order to be able to reach today's density ratio. We fit the degeneracy direction with a cubic polynomial \(\beta-\beta_0 = (a_t/0.22)^3\) to capture the \((\beta,a_t)\) dependence in the Hubble function, Eqs. ([\[friedman-2\]](#friedman-2){reference-type="ref" reference="friedman-2"}) and ([\[omegaUDM\]](#omegaUDM){reference-type="ref" reference="omegaUDM"}). Here \(\beta_0=54.6\) is the average chain value of \(\beta\) for \(a_t=0\), while \(a_t=0.22\) is the median \(a_t\) value quoted in Table [1](#table-UDM){reference-type="ref" reference="table-UDM"}. With these assumptions, we find the following 1-\(\sigma\) constraint: \[(\beta-\beta_0)\,\left(\frac{a_t}{0.22}\right)^{-3} = 24.8 \pm 5.9\.\] We also need to look with higher resolution to the intermediate regime of \(\beta\), to compare the likelihoods of the slow transition models with the fast transition ones. This is the regime of \(\beta\) of a few hundreds, where the \(\tanh\) function is not yet a step function. We thus ran a new \((a_t,\beta)\) chain restricted to \(\beta < 2000\). The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. [\[fig:UDM-bmin\]](#fig:UDM-bmin){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:UDM-bmin"}. The distribution of \(a_t\) is now well constrained, showing a tight peak with a low-likelihood tail for low \(a_t\) values. The tail corresponds to the slow transition regime studied in Fig. [\[fig:UDM-bgap\]](#fig:UDM-bgap){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:UDM-bgap"}. This result then strongly favors intermediate and fast transitions over slow ones. This is confirmed by the posterior of \(\beta\) that shows a strong increase from slow to fast transition, peaking around \(\beta=600\). After the peak, the distribution falls down slowly with a long tail, which is just an effect of the strong prior \(\beta < 2000\) imposed in this analysis, since the likelihood is essentially flat. We see then that the \(\beta\) distribution is far from Gaussian and we can only find a lower limit for this parameter. From the \(\Delta \chi^2\) values, we find a 1-\(\sigma\) lower bound of \(\beta > 300\).
# Conclusions {#sec:concl}
In recent years, UDM models, for which DM and DE are described by a single dark fluid, have become increasingly popular and drawn a considerable amount of attention. These models are undoubtedly promising candidates as effective theories. In this work, we have constrained a UDM scalar field model with a fast transition. The scalar field used has a noncanonical kinetic term in its Lagrangian and accounts for both the accelerated expansion of the Universe at late times and the clustering properties of the large-scale structure of the Universe at early times. The fast transition occurs between an Einstein-de Sitter CDM-like epoch and a late accelerated DE-like epoch and allows one to have a sufficiently small Jeans length, even if the speed of sound is large during the transition, because this happens so quickly that its effect is negligible. In this study we investigated the regimes of slow and fast transition and assessed if they were distinguishable at background level. For this analysis we tested the models using supernovae Ia, baryon acoustic oscillations and CMB distance data. We have found a lower bound constraint for the rapidity of the transition \(\beta > 300\), independent of the transition redshift. Slow transition models \(\beta < 40\) were ruled out, while low-likelihood intermediate rapidity models featured a correlation between the transition redshift and rapidity. The evidence of this model was compared to the evidence of \(\Lambda\)CDM and a phenomenological fast transition UDM model that was previously shown to be a good fit to background data. In both comparisons the model fared well, with no conclusive evidence against it. The preference found for the fast transition regime, which is the condition required for enabling structure formation, together with the fact that the model has a similar evidence to \(\Lambda\)CDM and is a k-essence type physically motivated model with a well-defined Lagrangian, makes it an interesting and viable fundamental cosmological model. For completeness, it is worth mentioning that k-essence-type models suffer in general from the development of caustics in the nonlinear regime (see however ). That is to say, characteristics of equations of motion cross at some finite time rendering the k-essence scalar field no longer single valued and consequently second derivatives of the field diverge. That would suggest that k-essence models cannot be considered as fundamental. However, this issue could possibly be solved by making the metric dynamical, such that gravitational backreaction would prevent the formation of caustics. Another possible way out of this problem was recently proposed in, by introducing a complex scalar field such that the singularity does not develop in the real time and the real time evolution always remains smooth. We thank Vincenzo Salzano for the use of his nested sampling code and Ruth Lazkoz and Diogo Castelão for discussions. We also thank the anonymous referee for having raised the point of the inconsistency of the name 'unified dark matter'. This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through the research Grant No. UID/FIS/04434/2013. I.T. acknowledges support from FCT through the Investigador FCT Contract No. IF/01518/2014 and POPH/FSE (EC) by FEDER funding through the program COMPETE. A.R.F. gratefully acknowledges support from FCT through Fellowship No. SFRH/BPD/96981/2103 (Portugal) and from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain) through Project No. FIS2012-38816. I.L. acknowledges financial support through research Projects No. FIS2014-57956-P (comprising FEDER funds) from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad and No. GIC17/116-IT956-16 from the Basque Government. I.L. further acknowledges financial support from the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) through PhD Grant No. 750/2014, and from FCT through the Exploratory Project No. IF/01518/2014 (GLUE) during his stay at Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa where part of this work was carried out. This article is based upon work from COST Action CA15117 (CANTATA), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).
[^1]: The name "unified dark matter" that prevails in the literature is misleading. To our knowledge, it is a colloquial simplification of "unified dark matter-energy", which was the original meaning of the acronym UDM first proposed in. We will follow the original proposal, reinstating the naming "unified dark matter-energy" as the meaning of the well-established acronym UDM.
[^2]: A scalar field with a potential that admits a minimum \(V_{0}=V(\phi_{0})\not =0\) is equivalent to a cosmological constant \(\rho_{\Lambda}=V_{0}\) and a scalar field in a potential \(\tilde{V}=V-V_{0}\). | {'timestamp': '2017-07-18T02:09:28', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01706', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01706'} |
# Introduction {#intro}
Multibody system dynamics is a well established discipline in the context of railway vehicle design. It is used for new concept performance evaluation, stability, lifetime, wear prediction, etc. In general it is desirable to be able to do these analyses as fast as possible. In particular, due to the huge number of computations required, computational performance can be very important when dealing with design optimization. Nevertheless these tasks do not demand strict real-time performance. The computational power available on today's off-the-shelf computers is getting closer to allow real-time direct numerical simulation of complex railway vehicle models. This in turn opens up new possibilities that can greatly benefit the design, safety, and model based predictive maintenance in the railway field. Most important applications can be considered to be HiL (Hardware in the Loop) on the design side, and on-line filtering techniques (Kalman filter alike) in the context of safety, and model based predictive maintenance. These developments usually run on the heels of previous work done in the context of vehicle dynamics. Symbolic multibody models have demonstrated to be an effective tool for the modeling of general multibody systems. In particular they have been shown to be very fast when using recursive \(O(n^3)\) formulations, that in turn require a parametrization based on relative coordinates. Main challenges are related to the enormous size of the expressions that the symbolic processor needs to deal with as this can limit the size of the problem to be analyzed. Recently, in the authors presented a symbolic multibody library in which the concept of recursivity is extended so that it is no longer based on the formulation but, instead, on the parametrization level. This is achieved by the definition of an algebra that includes the typical mechanics operators (position vector, velocity\... ) and that deals with the recursivity that might be embedded into the parametrization. The typical tree-shaped body structure is replaced by a tree structure for points and another one for bases. This gives a fine grained control of the recursivity that, in this way, can be different for both tree structures. No limitation is imposed on the parametrization of the system. As a consequence the library allows to implement arbitrary dynamics formulations. Atomization (optimization of symbolic expression representation) is embedded into the library from the very bottom upwards. This alleviates the symbolic manipulation of expressions and lowers their complexity to a minimum. This in turn allows to obtain optimal atomizations that minimize the computational complexity and increases the size of the problems that is possible to analyze. This article pursues to evaluate the feasibility of real-time numerical simulation of a complex locomotive multibody model using state of the art symbolic modeling techniques referred above. For our study we use the FEVE 3000 locomotive. A generic (spline based) definition for the contact surfaces of the wheels and rails, including irregularities, is used. Based on these, creep forces are modeled using a direct symbolic implementation of the standard linear Kalker model without simplifications of any kind. Bodies and rail are considered rigid with three-dimensional kinematics. No further simplifications as contact coordinate removal, pre-calculated tables, partial linearization or base parameter reduction are presented. To that end the modeling is done based on the multibody system symbolic library `lib_3D_MEC_GiNaC`, using a relative parametrization with respect to the inertial reference. The paper is structured as follows: In section [2](#sec1){reference-type="ref" reference="sec1"} the symbolic methods used in this work are briefly described. In section [3](#sec2){reference-type="ref" reference="sec2"} the description of the modeled system is presented. In section [\[sec3\]](#sec3){reference-type="ref" reference="sec3"} the most interesting details of the multibody modeling are presented. In section [\[sec4\]](#sec4){reference-type="ref" reference="sec4"} the results of the simulations are shown and discussed. Finally in section [\[sec5\]](#sec5){reference-type="ref" reference="sec5"} the main conclusions of this work are presented.
# Symbolic modeling procedures {#sec1}
Simply stated, the main goal of the symbolic modeling of multibody systems can be defined as: "*to obtain a set of functions that allow for the determination of the position, velocities and accelerations of all the bodies of the system*". Special symbolic procedures are required if a real-time-capable fast multibody model is desired. The main features of these procedures, as proposed in, are summarized below.
## Parametrization and system topology.
In order to model the multibody system a set of geometric parameters \(\mathbf{p}\) and generalized coordinates \(\mathbf{q}\), along with their associated velocity \(\dot{\mathbf{q}}\) and generalized accelerations \(\ddot{\mathbf{q}}\) are defined. We propose to split up the classical tree-shaped body structure into two different tree-shaped structures: 1) the bases structure and 2) the points structure, see Fig. [\[fig:points_bases\]](#fig:points_bases){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:points_bases"}. In this approach, bases \(\B_{j}\) and points \(P_{j}\) are defined in terms of other bases \(\B_{i}\) and points \(P_{i}\) by the way of relative base-change or rotation matrices \(\mathbf{R}_{\B_{i}}^{\B_{j}}\) and positions vectors \(\mathbf{r}_{P_{i}}^{P_{j}}\). The functions used by the symbolic library can be schematically represented as \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:new_base} \B_{i} & \label{eq:new_point} P_{i} & \end{aligned}\] where \(exp_*(\mathbf{q},t,\mathbf{p})\) represent arbitrary symbolic expressions in terms of which vectors and base-change matrices are defined. This in turn confers physical meaning to the defined coordinates and parameters. Note that, in order to illustrate the procedure, the rotation matrix appearing in Eq. ([\[eq:new_base\]](#eq:new_base){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:new_base"}) is parametrized using Euler parameters. This splitting of the body structure into the bases and points structures confers complete flexibility to the choice of the parametrization. A body position and orientation no longer needs to be defined with respect to the preceding body in the tree-shaped bodies structure. Instead, the body position is given by a point in the points structure and an orientation by a base in the bases structure. It should be noted that the bases structure is independent of the points structure. Conversely, the points structure is dependent on the bases structure as the relative position vector components are given using arbitrary bases (note the \(\B_k\) parameter in Eq. ([\[eq:new_point\]](#eq:new_point){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:new_point"})). Finally, it should be understood that the nature of the parameterization depends on the definition of the rotation matrices and position vectors. For example, if they are defined with respect to another point or orientation the coordinates will be "relative", but if they are defined with respect to an absolute point or orientation they will be "absolute".
## "On-the-way" atomization
The symbolic expressions that we need to deal with can be huge. The successive multiplication of symbolic expressions leads to an explosive growth in the size of the expressions that can limit the maximum size of the multibody systems that can be analyzed. In order to deal with this problem we use a standard technique in the context of symbolic computations that we call *atomization*. Atomization is a technique that condenses a symbolic expression set by splitting their expressions into several elemental sub-expressions. We call "atoms" to these elemental sub-expressions. They can be defined in terms of binary operations between symbols, numbers and/or other atoms. Or as transcendental functions of atoms. This technique is beneficial when repeated sub-expressions appear and the same atom is used to represent them. Symbolically, this means less memory-as the sub-expression is allocated in memory once-and faster symbolic manipulations. Numerically, this implies that the repeated sub-expression is only computed once leading to computational cost savings. In the present context, we deal with the sets of expressions related to the functions used to computationally implement a given MSD formalism. This atomized representation leads directly to the exportation of these functions in a way that benefits from the referred computational cost savings. To get a less abstract idea, Fig. [\[fig_atomization\]](#fig_atomization){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_atomization"} shows the exported C code for the mass matrix of a simple four-bar linkage mechanism. The atomization process should ideally be done "on-the-way", meaning that every time a new algebraic operation is performed a new atom is created or replaced by an existing matching atom. Thus, the symbolic method takes advantage of the memory savings and the associated complexity reduction as soon as possible in the problem setup. This means that the symbolic algebra system works internally with atomized expressions. A feature that is not obvious for the standard user but that is widespread in computer algebra systems. See Fig. [\[fig:on_the_way\]](#fig:on_the_way){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:on_the_way"} for an elemental example. In the same line, it is important to remember that the fundamental symbolic differentiation and substitution operations should be implemented to work directly on atomized expressions. This maximizes atom recycling and limits enormously the time and memory requirements of the algorithms. In this context, to take advantage of the atomization, care should be taken when choosing the way and order in which the required operations are performed. The operation number should be minimized and atom recycling maximized. A general purpose algorithm aiming at finding an absolute minimum number of operations would require an exhaustive search that is beyond the reach of reasonable computational resources. Therefore, it is required to define appropriate heuristics. Recursive dynamics formulations are usually taken as the starting point to define such heuristics. In our work, these heuristics are partly implemented by the way of mechanics operators, as will be explained in the next section.
## Recursive kinematic operators
Recursive formulations represent the state-of-the-art on symbolic MSD. These formulations use relative coordinates to parametrize the system leading to a tree-shaped body structure[^1]. This allows the recursive determination positions, velocities and accelerations of points as well as orientations, angular velocities and accelerations of bodies, by the way of the well known "motion composition laws". When different elements-points and orientations-share a common path towards the tree root, this implies the sharing of common sub-expressions. If applied symbolically, this recursive computation produces nearly good optimal "on-the-way" atomizations. This sharing of expressions is the main feature on which the kinematic forward recursion step, found in recursive formulations, is based. For example, for a serial multibody system the angular velocity of body \(S_{i+1}\) with respect to \(S_{i-1}\) could be expressed as follows: \[\begin{aligned}
\boldsymbol{\omega}^{S_{i+1}}_{S_{i-1}} = \boldsymbol{\omega}^{S_{i}}_{S_{i-1}} + \boldsymbol{\omega}^{S_{i+1}}_{S_{i}} \end{aligned}\] In the same way the angular velocity of body \(S_{i+2}\) with respect to \(S_{i-1}\) is expressed as: \[\begin{aligned}
\boldsymbol{\omega}^{S_{i+2}}_{S_{i-1}} = \boldsymbol{\omega}^{S_{i}}_{S_{i-1}} + \boldsymbol{\omega}^{S_{i+1}}_{S_{i}} + \boldsymbol{\omega}^{S_{i+2}}_{S_{i+1}}= \boldsymbol{\omega}^{S_{i+1}}_{S_{i-1}} + \boldsymbol{\omega}^{S_{i+2}}_{S_{i+1}} \end{aligned}\] So, when computing magnitudes related to a given element it can be appreciated how computations related to elements down in the same chain can be reused. Other kinematic entities like position vectors, base-change matrices, linear velocities, accelerations and angular accelerations can be dealt with analogously. In correspondence with the substitution of the bodies structure by the bases and points structures proposed in our work, the recursivity at the level of bodies is now dealt with at the bases and points structure levels. This allows not only to use arbitrary parametrizations, as commented before, but also a better use of the any degree of recursivity that may be implicit when using arbitrary parametrizations. To that end, kinematic operators that take advantage of any recursivity present in the parameterization are defined: Position vector between two points, velocity of a point with respect to a given frame (point plus orientation), angular velocity, base-change matrix, and so on. Basically the typical *recursivity* found in recursive algorithms is translated to the operator algebra. To support this an algebra of 3D vectors and tensors is defined. This algebra relieves the user of dealing with base-changes that are internally dealt with. The full system works using "on-the-way" atomization and the operators are implemented taking advantage of the aforementioned recursivity. In this way, the number of operations is minimized and the reuse of atoms is maximized. As a consequence an optimal implementation of the given formalism for any parameterization chosen by the user is obtained. The backward recursion of \(O(n^3)\) algorithms can be considered a particular implementation of the principle of the virtual power. The inertia forces and moments of the bodies affected by a given virtual movement appear added together in the contribution of this virtual movement to the system dynamic equations. Recursive formulations take advantage of this grouping so that they minimize the required operation count. Taking advantage of this when applying symbolically the principle of virtual power produces atomizations as efficient as state-of-the-art \(O(n^3)\) formulations. This is the approach followed by the symbolic implementation of the virtual power principle used in this work. As an illustration of the achievements of our symbolic methods, we can obtain nearly optimal atomized equations for standard multibody systems using for example the principle of the virtual power and relative coordinates. Some authors claim to be unable to do the same unless a direct symbolic implementation of a recursive formulation is used[^2].
## Other symbolic methods
There are other symbolic methods that can be applied to reduce even further the complexity of the resulting model: *"trigonometricaly simplifiable expression removal"*, *"base parameter formulation of the system inertias"*, *"base parameter elimination"*, etc\... This methods can be applied directly on top of the presented modeling techniques. However, they are not considered in this work.
# Multibody model description {#sec2}
The *FEVE 3000* locomotive multibody model developed in this work is depicted in Fig. [\[fig:locomotive\]](#fig:locomotive){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:locomotive"} with an expanded view of the main parts shown in Fig. [\[fig:expanded_bodies\]](#fig:expanded_bodies){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:expanded_bodies"}. The \(Vehicle\ Body\) (dark grey) is attached to the front and rear bogies thought two \(Slider\) (green) bodies. The front bogie consists of a \(Slider\) that rests on a couple of \(Suspender\) (orange) bodies hanging from the \(Bogie\ Frame\) (dark blue), and two \(Wheelset\) bodies (light blue) each of them with two \(Axle\ Box\) (red) bodies. There is a couple of anti-yaw links (grey) between each \(Suspender\) and the bogie frame. The rear bogie is identical to the front one but it includes two motors (one per each \(Wheelset\)). The motor \(Housing\) (mauve) rotates around the relative \(Wheelset\) and is attached to the \(Bogie\ Frame\) using a bushing. The motor includes a \(Rotor\) (pink). The transmission of motion from the \(Rotor\) to the \(Wheelset\) is done by the way of a gear pair. The \(Slider\) is connected by four identical spring-dampers to the Suspender part of the \(Bogie\ Frame\). In a similar way, each \(Axle\ Box\) is connected to the \(Bogie\ Frame\) by two identical spring-dampers. The \(Housing\) is also attached to the \(Bogie\ Frame\) using a bushing. Compliance is considered in the gearing contacts. Linear stiffness and damping is assumed for spring-dampers, bushings and gear compliance. Braking on the wheels and traction on the rotors is modeled considering externally applied torques. The wheel-rail interaction model considers a fully three-dimensional rolling contact considering a single contact point per wheel. Normal contact is enforced through the use of constraints, while the tangential forces are determined based on the standard Kalker linear constitutive model. Note that we consider generic wheel and rail profiles. The rails can present general irregularities along the track.
## Parametrization
### Multibody {#multibody .unnumbered}
The \(Vehicle\ Body\) is positioned relative to the track using absolute coordinates (3 translations followed by 3 Euler rotations). Each \(Slider\) is attached to the \(Vehicle\) \(Body\) by a revolute joint. A rotation relative to the \(Vehicle\ Body\), in the vertical direction, is used to position the \(Slider\). To simplify the modeling, the effect of the anti-yaw bar is accounted for by removing the relative yaw motion between the \(Bogie\ Frame\) and the \(Slider\). With the same purpose, the \(Suspender\) is considered fixed to the \(Bogie\ Frame\). We use a vertical translation followed by two successive horizontal rotations (roll and tilt) to position the \(Bogie\ Frame\) relative to the \(Slider\). Each \(Axle\ Box\) is positioned fixed to the "non-spinning wheelset" frame (NSWHS), a frame that follows the relative \(Wheelset\) but that does not spin with it. Each \(Wheelset\) is positioned relative to the \(Bogie\ Frame\) using a vertical translation and two horizontal rotations (roll and spin). Other relative degrees of freedom between these bodies are removed by the particular configuration of the spring-dampers. A rotation around the \(Wheelset\) axis, relative to the NSWHS frame, is used to place each motor \(Housing\). A rotation in the same direction, also relative to the NSWHS frame, is introduced to give the angular position of the \(Rotor\) of each motor. A total number of \(60\) generalized coordinates, \({\mathbf{q}}\), is used in this parametrization.
### Contact {#contact .unnumbered}
The rails and wheel surfaces are described using cubic splines, \[\begin{aligned} f^*(u^*) = (((a^* (u^*-u^*_{bp}) + b^* ) (u^*-u^*_{bp}) + c^*) (u^*-u^*_{bp}) +d^*), \label{eq:spline} \end{aligned}\] defined based on a set of control points that approximate their geometry. Figure [\[fig:surfaces\]](#fig:surfaces){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:surfaces"} schematically shows the parametrization for a wheel-rail pair. The wheel and rail profiles are given respectively by \(f^w(u^w)\) and \(f^r(u^r)\), while the shape of the center line of the base of the rail along the track is given by \(f_x^t(s^r)\), \(f_y^t(s^r)\) and \(f_z^t(s^r)\). Wheel surfaces are supposed to have cylindrical symmetry. Not represented in the figure is the spline used to represent the camber of the rail \(f_\theta^t(s^r)\). For the contact point at each wheel-rail pair the parameters \(\theta^w, u^w\) and \(s^r, u^r\) play the role of "generalized coordinates" used to position the contact points, \(P^w\) and \(P^r\), respectively onto the wheel and rail surfaces. When the contact is materialized, the point \(P^w\) and the point \(P^r\)-defined as an arbitrary points in the surfaces of the wheel and rail respectively-are coincident. The position of \(P^w\) is given relative to a reference point in the wheel axis, \(O^w\), as \[\begin{aligned} \mathbf{r}_{O^w}^{P^w}(u^w,\theta^w) = f^w(u^w) \cos(\theta^w) \mathbf{e}^w_x + u^w \mathbf{e}^w_y-f^w(u^w)\sin(\theta^w) \mathbf{e}^w_z. \label{eq:OwPw} \end{aligned}\] For numerical reasons, the position of this point is given relative to a NSWHS base, \(\mathbf{e}^w_x,\mathbf{e}^w_y ,\mathbf{e}^w_z\). Analogously, the position of \(P^r\) is given relative to a reference point in ground or track reference, \(O^r\) \[\begin{aligned} \mathbf{r}_{O^r}^{P^r}(u^r,s^r) = f_x^t(s^r)\mathbf{e}^r_x + f_y^t(s^r) \mathbf{e}^r_y + f_z^t(s^r) \mathbf{e}^r_z + u^r \hat{\mathbf{c}} + f^r(u^r) \hat{\mathbf{n}} \end{aligned}\] The base \(\mathbf{e}^r_x,\mathbf{e}^r_y ,\mathbf{e}^r_z\) is fixed at the ground. Defining \(\hat{\mathbf{t}}\) as a unit vector tangent to the center line of the rail base, \(\hat{\mathbf{c}}\) is defined as a unit vector perpendicular to \(\hat{\mathbf{t}}\) with an angle \(f_\theta^t(s^r)\) with the ground measured in the positive direction of \(\hat{\mathbf{t}}\). \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\) completes the base so that it is dexterous. The whole set of \(8\times 4=32\) generalized coordinates required to position the \(i=1...,8\) contact points used in the analyzed example is referred as \(\mathbf{s}=[...,\mathbf{s}_i^\mathsf{T}...]^\mathsf{T}\). Where \(\mathbf{s}_i=[\theta^w_i, u^w_i,s^r_i, u^r_i]^\mathsf{T}\) is set of coordinates required to position points \(P^w_i\) and \(P^r_i\) at the \(i\)-th contact point. From the symbolic modeling point of view, functions \(f^*(u^*)\) are the are modeled as if a single \(3^{rd}\) order polynomial completely represents the whole profiles. At "show-time", the coefficients \(a^*\), \(b^*\), \(c^*\), \(d^*\) and break-points \(u^*_{bp}\) are updated depending on the position of the contact point. As commented before, for the purposes of this paper we only consider a single point of contact. Note, that flange contact rarely occurs when the train runs along straight tracks or huge radii curved tracks unless train velocity is close to its critical speed. Nevertheless the parametrization proposed here is compatible some multiple-point-of-contact approaches.
## Constraint equations {#subsec:ConstrEqus}
The only constrains that are present in the analyzed problem are those related to the contact points between wheel an rail. At a given contact, it should be enforced that the points \(P^w\) and \(P^r\) are coincident and that the surfaces at these points are tangent. Defining the tangent and normal vectors to the wheel at point \(P^w\) as \(\mathbf{t}_x^w\), \(\mathbf{t}_y^w\), \(\mathbf{n}^w\), and the tangent and normal vectors to the rail at point \(P^r\) as \(\mathbf{t}_x^r\), \(\mathbf{t}_y^r\), \(\mathbf{n}^r\). These conditions can be written as:
[^1]: Closed loops are opened to parametrize and closed through constraint equations.
[^2]: In comparison, our method presents the overhead of having to deal with the common atom search. Even if using hash tables to do the search our symbolic processing phase seems to take longer. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:04:36', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01657', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01657'} |
# Introduction
The spiral flow in the annulus between concentric circular cylinders is an example of a flow that is susceptible to transition through combined action of several physical mechanisms. In the particular case when the helical pattern of the basic flow streamlines that characterises a spiral flow results from an imposed axial pressure gradient in conjunction with rotation of the inner cylinder alone, there are two well-known distinct physical mechanisms of disturbance propagation that can trigger transition. These are: 1) the *Tollmien-Schlichting mechanism* and, 2) the *Taylor mechanism*. The features of these mechanisms acting on their own come convincingly to light when transition of the spiral flow in question in its limiting cases are contrasted with each other. The limiting cases are when the pitch of the helix, measured through the angle the helix makes with the common axis of the cylinders, assumes values of either \(0\) or \(\frac{\pi}{2}\). Differences between the *Tollmien-Schlichting mechanism* and the *Taylor mechanism* are indeed striking and readily visible in flow visualization studies, see eg.. In theory the differences manifest themselves most convincingly when dynamical characteristics of transition inducing disturbances in the limiting cases of the spiral flow are contrasted with each other. An outstanding difference between the two limiting cases is the appearance of a *critical layer* within the flow when the *Tollmien-Schlichting mechanism* alone is responsible for transition, which is realised when the pitch of the helix is \(0\). In contrast, no *critical layer* appears when the *Taylor mechanism* alone causes transition as it is when the pitch is \(\frac{\pi}{2}\). From physical reasoning based on affinity of disturbance propagation characteristics, one would expect that a *critical layer* might arise in the spiral flow undergoing transition when the pitch of the helix of its basic flow streamline is close to \(0\). It would vanish on the pitch increasing from \(0\), to disappear entirely when the pitch reaches \(\frac{\pi}{2}\). It is then of scientific interest to examine when and/or under what conditions a *critical layer* may arise or disappear during transition of the spiral flow. The aim of the present work is to derive these conditions from first principles, *i.e.* from the linearised equations governing propagation of small-amplitide disturbances to the spiral flow. The significance of the *critical layer* in transition is related to the generation of *Reynolds stresses*, see eg., ,, ,, , ,. Besides the differences in the mechanisms referred to earlier some further pronounced differences may be outlined. These are as follows. In the *Tollmien-Schlichting mechanism* transition is induced by travelling waves of the disturbance. These are effective even in a basic flow with straight and parallel streamlines. Curvature of the basic flow streamlines is therefore not essential for onset of transition through this mechanism. In contrast, in the *Taylor mechanism* transition is not possible in the absence of curvature of the basic flow streamlines. When the *critical layer* appears, it is located at a position in the flow where flow velocity and the phase velocity of the neutrally stable travelling disturbance wave are equal to each other. Its location coincides with a singularity occuring in the inviscid form of the set of linearized equations for disturbance propagation. The singularity is most readily evident when the set of linearised equations for disturbances are cast in a form of the *Orr-Sommerfeld equation*. It is then recognisable through the coefficient of the second derivative of the wall-normal component of the disturbance velocity changing its sign.
## Outline of the present paper {#outline-of-the-present-paper .unnumbered}
In Section 2 the present state of understanding of the *critical layer* during transition of spiral Poiseuille flow is subject to a brief critical review. The purpose of this Section is to prepare ground for the reformulation of the disturbance propagatioon problem in a spiral Poiseulle flow undertaken in the present work. It will be seen in the course of this work that a *reformulation* of disturbance propagation is essential for proper imbedding of the phenomenon in the flow of current interest in the extensively studied past work of disturbance propagation in its two limiting cases. In Section 3 the reformulation of the problem is introduced, which is essentially the derivation of the *Generalised Orr-Sommerfeld and Squire equations*. In Section 4 the relations of the *Generalised Orr-Sommerfeld and Squire equations* to the limiting cases of flows with mild and strong swirl are illuminated. The equations for the case of mild swirl bring out the outstanding characteristics of the *critical layer in spiral flow* in an analytical form. In Section 5, the meaning of the analytical results derived are discussed and summarised.
# A brief critical review of the present state of understanding of the *critical layer* during transition of the spiral Poiseuille flow
When both the *Tollmien-Schlichting mechanism* and the *Taylor mechanism* are acting simultaneously, as in the *annular spiral flow*, questions regarding the dominance of one over the other in a certain region of the parameter space arise. Forms of manifestation of this dominance are, as expected, of fundamental scientific interest. Physical reasoning would lead one to expect that the *Tollmien-Schlichting mechanism* would dominate over the other when the pitch of the helix is close to \(0\), whereas it would be the *Taylor mechanism* when the pitch is close to \(\frac{\pi}{2}\). This expectation would in turn lead to the possibility of a *critical layer* arising in the spiral flow when its helical angle lies close to \(0\). Besides the mechanism as such, knowledge of the character of the dominant transition inducing disturbance, in particular whether it is toroidal or helical in nature, would shed light on the changes that might be expected in the observable flow pattern as the flow is taken through the parameter space, thus forming a major step towards understanding of the complexity of transition in this apparently simple flow. It is therefore only but natural that a large number of research papers are devoted to studies of disturbance propagation and transition in spiral flows. A cursory search through published literature shows them to have been appearing from time to time, starting from the early days of transition research, see eg. the classical book of Chandrasekhar, and continuing right into the present day. An insight into the highly ramified nature of the problems arising in this and related flows is provided by the papers of Hasoon and Martin, DiPrima and Pridor, Takeuchi and Jankowski, Ng and Turner, papers authored or co-authored by Cotrell and Pearlstein, by Meseguer and Marques, by Avila, Meseguer and Marques, ,, by Leclerq, Pier and Scott, Deguchi and Altmeyer, , and by the authors of further references cited in these papers. An examination of the equations for the study of disturbance propagation which are employed in the cited references shows that the approaches taken by the authors may be grouped under two broad headings depending upon the manner in which the pressure disturbance is treated. In one, the pressure disturbance is treated explicitly as an unknown, which leaves four unknowns to be determined from the four equations that are available, *viz.* the momentum equations in the three directions and the continuity equation. In the other, the pressure disturbance does not appear as an unknown, and there are only three unknowns which are the components of the velocity disturbance. The task then faced is to formulate an appropriate set of three equations for determining the three components of the velocity disturbance, without loss of substance of the subject of investigation. A study of published literature shows that this task is carried out through procedures tailored to the basic flow. For the basic flow with straight and parallel streamlines it is the procedure for derivation of the *Orr-Sommerfeld equation*. For the basic flow with concentric circular streamlines it is the one worked out by Taylor for the *Taylor stability problem*, see Taylor. Both the procedures are described in well known published literature, eg. Stuart, Schmid and Henningson, Criminale, Jackson and Joslin, Chossat and Iooss, Meyer-Spasche. The relation between the two apparently diverse derivation procedures for elimination of the pressure disturbance in these two basic flows does not seem to have been a subject for discussion in published literature. A pressure disturbance elimination procedure for the basic flow of present interest which is characterized by helically wound streamlines, that is worked out along lines analogous to those in the other kinds of basic flow referred to, is also, to the knowledge of the authors, not known from published literature. One of the objectives of the present work is to present such a derivation procedure for the *spiral Poiseuille flow* that bridges the procedures for elimination of the pressure disturbance as an unknown in basic flows with *straight and parallel streamlines* on one hand and *concentrically circular streamlines* on the other. At this juncture it is in order to draw attention to some salient differences between the equations for the disturbance formulated in the two approaches just mentioned, when they are applied to the two limiting cases considered. In the approach with the pressure disturbance retained as an unknown, derivatives of the velocity disturbance appear up to the second order, whereas for the pressure disturbance they are present only to the first order. In the approach with the pressure disturbance eliminated, fourth order derivatives of the velocity disturbance appear for both the limiting cases, however with a subtle structural difference between the two. For the limiting case with the basic flow described by straight and parallel streamlines, the coefficient of the term with a second-order derivative of the velocity disturbance may pass through a zero, whereas there is no such zero-crossing in the equation for the velocity disturbance in the case with concentrically circular streamlines in the basic flow. It is now well known that the zero-crossing in the coefficient of the second derivative is decisive for the occurence of a *critical layer*, *viz. Tollmien's critical layer*, its location being given by this zero-crossing as an asymptotic approximation. As a matter of fact, it is the zero-crossing of the coefficient of the second derivative of the velocity disturbance that renders the occurence of the critical layer transparent from the governing equations themselves. As against this, no such critical layer arises in the corresponding equations for the basic flow with concentric circular streamlines. Neither is the critical layer discernible from the governing equations themselves if the pressure disturbance is retained as an unknown in their formulation. In *spiral Poiseuille flow*, the *strength* of swirl may be characterised through the ratio of the *two characteristic velocities* of the basic flow, which are the *axial* and *azimuthal characteristic velocities*, denoted \(U_{refx}\) and \(U_{ref \varphi}\) respectively. When the two mechanisms are acting simultaneously, as in the flow in question, intuition would suggest that the disturbance propagation mechanism of the transition inducing disturbance would lie closer to either the *Tollmien-Schlichting* or the *Taylor* mechanism, depending upon the ratio of the two characteristic velocities. One would then expect that, for an arbitrarily given value of this ratio, which may lie between between zero and infinity, the set of linearised equations themselves that describe the velocity disturbances in the swirling basic flow in the annulus would lie closer to the corresponding set of equations for the velocity disturbances when the ratio of the two characteristic velocities attains values of zero or infinity, as the case may be. These are the Orr-Sommerfeld and Squire equations for the plane channel flow, possibly corrected for the effects of transverse curvature, when the azimuthal characteristic velocity is zero, and, Taylor's equations for disturbance propagation in the annular gap between concentric cylinders when the axial characteristic velocity is zero. A close surveillance of the published work in this area, however, shows that, when the approach with elimination of the pressure disturbance is followed, the equations employed in the cited literature to describe disturbance propagation in swirling flows do not degenerate to the Orr-Sommerfeld and Squire equations in the absence of swirl in the basic flow.
# The proposed alternative formulation
The basic flow of our problem is the fully developed spiral flow in an annulus. The proposed alternative approach views the phenomenon of disturbance propagation in this flow in terms of a set of revised parameters which are going to be shortly introduced. Conventionally, the axial and azimuthal velocity components in the basic flow of our problem, \(V_{Gx}\) and \(V_{G \varphi}\), are written as products of the two characteristic velocities in the two directions, *viz.* \(U_{refx}\) and \(U_{ref\varphi}\) respectively, with the shape functions in that order, \(U_x (r; \epsilon_R)\) and \(U_{\varphi} (r; \epsilon_R)\). Here \(r\) is the radius, and \(\epsilon_R = \frac{R_o-R_i}{R_o + R_i}\) is a measure of the transverse curvature with \(R_o\) and \(R_i\) denoting the radii of the outer and the inner cylindrical surfaces of the annulus. In the particular case of the spiral flow in question, in which the flow is maintained in the wall-bounded annulus between the concentric cylinders by an axial pressure gradient, \(\frac{dP_G}{dx}\), together with the inner cylinder rotating with an angular velocity, \(\Omega_i\), a natural choice for the characteristic velocities would be: \(U_{refx}=-\frac{H^2}{2 \mu} \frac{dP_G}{dx}\) and \(U_{ref\varphi} = R_i \Omega_i\). Here, \(2H = R_o-R_i\) denotes the annular gap between the cylinders, and \(\mu\) the dynamic viscosity. We may note that the profiles of the axial and the azimuthal velocity components of the basic flow, \(U_{Gx}\) and \(U_{G \varphi}\), depend upon the transverse curvature parameter \(\epsilon_R\). They may also depend upon further parameters entering the problem, which might be the case when e.g. a cylinder wall is prescribed to move with a certain axial translational velocity. The revised parameters for our problem are the set constituting a characteristic velocity, \(U_{ref}\), defined through \(U_{ref}^2 = U_{refx}^2 + U_{ref \varphi}^2\), and a swirl parameter, \(S\), defined through \(S = \frac{U_{ref \varphi}}{U_{refx}}\). The velocity components of the basic flow are then given in terms of these revised parameters through the following expressions: \[\begin{aligned}
V_{Gx} = U_{ref} (1+S^2)^{-\frac{1}{2}} U_{Gx}(r; \epsilon_R); ~ ~ ~ V_{G \varphi} = U_{ref} S (1+S^2)^{-\frac{1}{2}} U_{G \varphi}(r; \epsilon_R). \label{basicflowrevisedparam} \end{aligned}\] The starting point for our work is the set of equations of motion in cylindrical co-ordinates which may be found in standard text books on fluid dynamics, (*vide* e.g. , ). Non-dimensionalisation of these equations with \(U_{ref}\) and \(H\) as reference quantities, setting the velocity and the pressure fields as sums of the basic flow and a disturbance, followed by linearisation for disturbances lead to equations for small-amplitude disturbances to the velocity and pressure fields of the basic flow. From these linearised equations for disturbances, the pressure disturbance may be eliminated through two different procedures which are described for the basic flow with straight and parallel streamlines in standard works on hydrodynamic stability *vide* e.g.. We refer to these procedures as the *Orr-Sommerfeld* and *Squire* procedures respectively. Carrying out these procedures in the cylindrical co-ordinate system adopted for the present problem leads in that order to the *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld* and *Squire equations*. They are, together with the *Continuity equation*, the governing equations for our problem. The unknowns in this set of equations are only the three components of the velocity disturbance, since the disturbance to the pressure does not appear any longer as an unknown. Profiles of the axial and azimuthal components of the basic flow, \(U_{Gx}(r)\) and \(U_{G \varphi}(r)\), and their first and second derivatives occur as coefficients in the governing equations. These equations are given to the order \(O(r^{-2})\) in the **Appendix**. For the purposes of the present work it is convenient to write the set in a compact matrix form as follows: \[D \mathbf u = \mathbf 0. \label{generalisedossqcont}\] We refer to ([\[generalisedossqcont\]](#generalisedossqcont){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedossqcont"}) as the set of *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld, Squire and Continuity equations*. Here the linear differential operator, \(D\), depends upon the Reynolds number \(Re\) based on the characteristic velocity \(U_{ref}\) and the semi-gap width \(H\) as reference quantities, on the swirl parameter \(S = \frac{U_{ref \varphi}}{U_{ref x}}\), and also upon the ratio of the annular gap-width to the mean cylinder radius, \(\epsilon_R\). The differential operator \(D\) itself may be written in a matrix form as follows: \[\begin{aligned}
D = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} D_{OSr} & D_{OS \varphi} & D_{OSx}\\ D_{Sqr} & D_{Sq \varphi} & D_{Sqx}\\ D_{Cor} & D_{Co \varphi} & D_{Cox} \end{array} \right), \label{breakdownofossqco} \end{aligned}\] where the subscripts \(OS\), \(Sq\) and \(Co\) indicate in that order the matrix partial differential operators arising from the *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld*, *Squire* and Continuity equations, and the subscripts \(r, \varphi\) and \(x\) stand for partial derivatives operating on \(u_r, u_{\varphi}\) and \(u_x\) respectively. Expressions for the operators in ([\[breakdownofossqco\]](#breakdownofossqco){reference-type="ref" reference="breakdownofossqco"}) follow from a comparison of ([\[breakdownofossqco\]](#breakdownofossqco){reference-type="ref" reference="breakdownofossqco"}) with ([\[generalisedorrsommerfeld\]](#generalisedorrsommerfeld){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedorrsommerfeld"}), ([\[generalisedsquire\]](#generalisedsquire){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedsquire"}) and the continuity equation given in the **Appendix**. We may draw the reader's attention at this juncture to a salient difference between the *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld equation*, and *Orr-Sommerfeld equation* for the conventional problem. It is that, in contrast to the conventional case in which disturbance propagation in a basic flow with wall-parallel streamlines is described, in the *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld equation*, the wall-normal component of the velocity disturbance \(u_r\) does not stand all by itself. The transverse curvature inherent in the geometry causes \(u_r\) to occur coupled with \(u_{\varphi}\).
# The relation between the *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld and Squire equations* and the equations for the classical cases.
It will be shown in this section that the *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld and Squire equations*, ([\[generalisedossqcont\]](#generalisedossqcont){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedossqcont"}), which are written in terms of the revised parameters, degenerate into the known classical cases when the swirl parameter, \(S\), approaches the limits of \(0\) or \(\infty\). These are the well-established equations describing the transition mechanisms of *Tollmien-Schlichting* and *Taylor* respectively. Besides establishing these relationships, the equations for the limit \(S \rightarrow 0\) also show in analytical form the nature of the dependence of the location of the critical layer on the parameter \(S\). For illustrative purposes we will demonstrate this degeneration process for the example of the fully developed spiral flow in an annulus whose values of the ratio of the gap width to the mean radius is small, and in conjunction with rotation of the inner cylinder alone. To this end, it is meaningful to transform the variable from the radius \(r\) to \(y\), where \(y\) is the radial co-ordinate measured from the mean radius \(\frac{R_o + R_i}{2}\), non-dimensionalised with \(H\), and convert the partial differential equation ([\[generalisedossqcont\]](#generalisedossqcont){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedossqcont"}) into an ordinary differential equation. The conversion may be carried out through substitution of the standard modal ansatz \[\mathbf u = \mathbf A(y) \exp \{\imath (\lambda_x x + n_{\varphi} \varphi)-\omega t \} + c.c., \label{modalansatzforu}\] in ([\[generalisedossqcont\]](#generalisedossqcont){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedossqcont"}). In ([\[modalansatzforu\]](#modalansatzforu){reference-type="ref" reference="modalansatzforu"}), \(\bf A\) is a column vector whose components are, in a self-explanatory notation, \((A_r, A_{\varphi}, A_x)^T\). Using ([\[modalansatzforu\]](#modalansatzforu){reference-type="ref" reference="modalansatzforu"}) in conjunction with asymptotic expansions for \(U_{Gx}\) and \(U_{G \varphi}\) for small values of the geometrical parameter \(\epsilon_R = \frac{R_o-R_i}{R_o + R_i} = \frac{2 H}{R_o + R_i} \rightarrow ~ 0\), which may be verified to be \(\left(U_{Gx} \right)_{\epsilon_R \rightarrow 0} \simeq \left((1-y^2)-\epsilon_R \frac{y(1-y^2)}{3} + O(\epsilon_R^2) \right)\) and \(\left(U_{G \varphi}\right)_{\epsilon_R \rightarrow 0} \simeq \left(\frac{(1-y)}{2}-\epsilon_R \frac{(1-y^2)}{2} + O(\epsilon_R^2) \right)\), casts ([\[generalisedossqcont\]](#generalisedossqcont){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedossqcont"}) into the set of ordinary differential equations for \((A_r, A_{\varphi}, A_x)^T\). In order to facilitate comparison of the different derivatives of \(\mathbf A\) in the *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld, Squire and Continuity equations* with corresponding terms in plane channel flow it is meaningful to rewrite the converted set of ordinary differential equations ordered according to the coefficients of the vectorial velocity disturbance and its derivatives according to the following scheme: \[\mathbf K_4 \frac{d^4 \bf A}{dy^4} + \mathbf K_3 \frac{d^3 \bf A}{dy^3} + \mathbf K_2 \frac{d^2 \bf A}{dy^2}+ \mathbf K_1 \frac{d \bf A}{dy} + \mathbf K_0 \bf A = 0. \label{reorderedgeneralisedossqcont}\] In ([\[reorderedgeneralisedossqcont\]](#reorderedgeneralisedossqcont){reference-type="ref" reference="reorderedgeneralisedossqcont"}), \(\mathbf K_4,.. \mathbf K_0\) are matrices that are derivable from the matrix differential operator \(D\), together with the ansatz ([\[modalansatzforu\]](#modalansatzforu){reference-type="ref" reference="modalansatzforu"}). They may themselves be grouped as follows: \[\begin{aligned}
\mathbf K_k = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} K_{kOSr} & K_{kOS \varphi} & K_{OSx}\\ K_{kSqr} & K_{Sq \varphi} & K_{Sqx}\\ K_{Cor} & K_{Co \varphi} & K_{Cox} \end{array} \right), \label{defnmathbfk} \end{aligned}\] where the subscript \(k\) stands for \(k = 0, 1, 2, 3\) or \(4\). Many elements of the coefficient matrices \(\mathbf K_0,... \mathbf K_4\) are zero. From the *Orr-Sommerfeld* row of the equations ([\[reorderedgeneralisedossqcont\]](#reorderedgeneralisedossqcont){reference-type="ref" reference="reorderedgeneralisedossqcont"}, [\[defnmathbfk\]](#defnmathbfk){reference-type="ref" reference="defnmathbfk"}) we may obtain, on division through \((\imath \omega)\), the ordinary *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld* equation that can be written in a form that clearly brings out the similarities and differences between the classical case of the plane channel flow and the annular spiral flow presently under consideration. We get, including terms to the order \(O(\epsilon_R)\): \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{\imath \omega} \frac{1}{Re} \left(\frac{d^4 A_r}{dy^4} \right) + \left(1-\frac{\lambda_x}{\omega} \frac{(1-y^2)}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}}-\imath \frac{2}{Re}\frac{\lambda_x^2}{\omega} \right) \frac{d^2 A_r}{dy^2} \nonumber \\ -\left(1 + \frac{\lambda_x}{\omega} \frac{2}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}}-\frac{\lambda_x^3}{\omega} \frac{(1-y^2)}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \right) A_r \nonumber \\-\epsilon_R \left[\frac{\imath}{ \omega} \frac{2}{Re} \frac{d^3A_r}{dy^3} + \left( \frac{\lambda_x}{\omega} \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{y(1-y^2)}{3} + \frac{n_{\varphi}}{\omega} \frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{(1-y)}{2} \right) \frac{d^2 A_r}{dy^2} \right] \nonumber \\ + \epsilon_R \left[1-\frac{\lambda_x}{\omega} \frac{(1-y^2)}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} + \imath \frac{2 \lambda_x^2}{\omega Re} \right] \frac{dA_r}{dy} \nonumber \\ + \epsilon_R \left[\frac{\lambda_x}{\omega} \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}}\left(4y + \frac{y(1-y^2) \lambda_x^2}{3} \right) + \frac{n_{\varphi}}{\omega} \frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{(1-y)}{2} \lambda_x^2 \right] A_r = 0. \label{oseqnforar} \end{aligned}\] A cursory examination of the above ordinary differential equation shows that for \(\epsilon_R = 0\), ([\[oseqnforar\]](#oseqnforar){reference-type="ref" reference="oseqnforar"}) reduces to the Orr-Sommerfeld equation for plane channel flow that is known from literature, eg., , ,. For \(\epsilon_R \ne 0\) corrections to the classical Orr-Sommerfeld equation arise and a surveillance of the correction terms shows that among these, two different forms of dependence on the swirl parameter, \(S\), are distinguishable. In one of these \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}}\) appears as a coefficient, and this contribution is ascribable to the transverse curvature that is inherent in the geometry considered. The other exhibits \(\frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}}\) as a coefficient, and this describes the effect of swirl. Terms belonging to the former remain small over the entire range of values of \(S\) from \(0\) to \(\infty\), whereas those belonging to the latter need not remain small when \(S \rightarrow \infty\). We will refer to these two as cases of small and large swirl respectively, and examine them more closely.
## The case of small swirl and the critical layer
When the corrections to the equations are small, which is the case as long as the product \(\epsilon_R S n_{\varphi}\) remains small, we may expect the departure of the solutions from the case \(S = 0\) also to remain small, as long as there are no changes in the other parameters, \(Re, \epsilon_R\) and in the mode \(n_{\varphi}\). This is tantamount to the expectation that the neutral stability curves in the \((Re,\lambda_x)\)-plane in the \((Re, S, \epsilon_R; \lambda_x, n_{\varphi})\)-space bear similarity to each other, a feature that would facilitate computational determination of the neutrally stable surface and the critical parameters in the multi-parameter space of \(Re, S\) and \(\epsilon_R\). We may note that the equation ([\[oseqnforar\]](#oseqnforar){reference-type="ref" reference="oseqnforar"}) that is necessary to be solved to reach this objective, is an eigenvalue problem in which \(A_r\) is the only unknown, without any coupling with \(A_{\varphi}\) or \(A_x\). Numerical methods for solving the Orr-Sommerfeld equation in the more classical problems of hydrodynamic stability that have been developed, tested, and are available in published literature, see eg., , may then be expected to be applicable for solving ([\[oseqnforar\]](#oseqnforar){reference-type="ref" reference="oseqnforar"}).
### The critical layer, its location and scaling properties
The *Orr-Sommerfeld equation* for the case of mild swirl, ([\[oseqnforar\]](#oseqnforar){reference-type="ref" reference="oseqnforar"}), on comparison with the corresponding equation for the case of the basic flow with straight and parallel streamlines, see eg., exhibits a singularity of the same nature as in the classical case. It arises for neutrally stable disturbances in the inviscid counterpart of the problem presently under study when the Reynolds number is large. This observation leads to the expression for the location of the *critical layer* in the flow in question. Analogous to the classical case, this singularity is removable in the complete problem through introduction of a thin *critical layer* of appropriate thickness in which viscous effects are retained. In the classical case of a basic flow with straight and parallel streamlines this is the well-known *Tollmien's critical layer*, and its thickness is \(O(Re^{-\frac{1}{3}})\). Application of the same procedure yields the scaling behaviour of the *critical layer* for the flow in question.
### Location of the critical layer {#location-of-the-critical-layer .unnumbered}
Inspection of ([\[oseqnforar\]](#oseqnforar){reference-type="ref" reference="oseqnforar"}) shows that the coefficient of the second derivative of \(A_r\) goes through zero for neutrally stable disturbances when the Reynolds number \(Re\) is not small, as it does in the classical case. The criterion for the *location of the critical layer*, \(y = y_c\), may therefore be written as follows: \[1-\frac{\lambda_x}{\omega} \frac{(1-y_c^2)}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}}-\epsilon_R \left( \frac{\lambda_x}{\omega} \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{y_c(1-y_c^2)}{3} + \frac{n_{\varphi}}{\omega} \frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{(1-y_c)}{2} \right) = 0. \label{critlayerloc}\] For \(\epsilon_R = 0\) the above expression is seen to be identical with the known result, i. e. the critical layer is located at a wall distance where the basic flow velocity and the phase speed of neutrally stable disturbances equal each other, see eg.. For \(\epsilon_R \ne 0\) the location of the critical layer depends, besides on \(S\), also upon the mode of the disturbance \(n_{\varphi}\). It is only for toroidal modes, for which \(n_{\varphi} = 0\), that ([\[critlayerloc\]](#critlayerloc){reference-type="ref" reference="critlayerloc"}) fulfills the condition of the local flow velocity and the phase velocity of the wave equalling each other, cf. expression for \(U_{Gx}\) in the text following ([\[modalansatzforu\]](#modalansatzforu){reference-type="ref" reference="modalansatzforu"}). For the modes \(n_{\varphi} \ne 0\) the terms subtracted from \(1\) in the expression ([\[critlayerloc\]](#critlayerloc){reference-type="ref" reference="critlayerloc"}) may be interpreted as the *inner product* of the *basic flow velocity vector*, \((U_{Gx}, U_{G \varphi})\), and the *slowness vector* of the wave of the particular mode in question, \(\frac{(\lambda_x, n_{\varphi})}{\omega}\), a concept introduced by Whitham in.
### The order of magnitude of the critical layer thickness {#the-order-of-magnitude-of-the-critical-layer-thickness .unnumbered}
An estimate of the order of magnitude of the critical layer thickness is obtainable by application of the same procedure as described in literature, eg. ), to the present problem. To this end we introduce in the critical layer the independent variable \(\eta_c\) defined through \(\eta_c = (y-y_c) Re^m_c\), write ([\[oseqnforar\]](#oseqnforar){reference-type="ref" reference="oseqnforar"}) in the neighbourhood of the critical layer and determine \(m_c\) such that the coefficients of \(\frac{d^4 A_r}{dy^4}\) and of \(\frac{d^2 A_r}{dy^2}\) in ([\[oseqnforar\]](#oseqnforar){reference-type="ref" reference="oseqnforar"}) can stand in balance with each other. Carrying out this procedure for the present problem shows that a distinction has to be made between the **modes of the disturbance**, i.e. between disturbances that are *toroidal* for which \(n_{\varphi}= 0\), and those that are *helical* for which \(n_{\varphi} \ne 0\). For *toroidal* disturbances one gets the same result as in the conventional case which is \(m_c =-\frac{1}{3}\). This result for \(m_c\) remains applicable to *helical disturbances*, \(n_{\varphi} \ne 0\), too, only as long as the product \(\epsilon_R S n_{\varphi}\) remains numerically small. The equation governing \(A_r\) in the *critical layer* is then as follows: \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{\imath \omega} \left(\frac{d^4 A_r}{d\eta_c^4} \right) + \left(1+ \frac{\lambda_x}{\omega} \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}}(2y_c \eta_c) \right) \frac{d^2 A_r}{d\eta_c^2} \nonumber \\ + \epsilon_R \left[ \left( \frac{\lambda_x}{\omega} \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{(2y_c \eta_c)}{3} + \frac{n_{\varphi}}{\omega} \frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{\eta_c}{2} \right) \frac{d^2 A_r}{d\eta_c^2} \right] \label{oseqnforarincritlayer} \end{aligned}\]
## The case of large swirl
It was seen in the previous subsection that the *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld and Squire equations*, ([\[generalisedossqcont\]](#generalisedossqcont){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedossqcont"}) or ([\[generalisedorrsommerfeld\]](#generalisedorrsommerfeld){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedorrsommerfeld"}, [\[generalisedsquire\]](#generalisedsquire){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedsquire"}), degenerate to their classical counterparts in plane channel flow, with corrections due to transverse curvature, as the *swirl parameter*, \(S\), goes to \(0\). In contrast, in the other limit \(S \rightarrow \infty\), a close examination of the same set of equations would show that the equations ( [\[generalisedorrsommerfeld\]](#generalisedorrsommerfeld){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedorrsommerfeld"}, [\[generalisedsquire\]](#generalisedsquire){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedsquire"}) then do not degenerate to those derived by Taylor for his stability problem. The noteworthy aspect of this failure is that proceeding to the limit \(S \rightarrow \infty\) in a straightforward manner does not result in an eigenvalue problem with a mutual coupling of \(A_r\) and \(A_{\varphi}\) deciding its stability, as it is the case in Taylor's treatment of this stability problem. However, this shortcoming may be overcome through rewriting the equations ([\[generalisedorrsommerfeld\]](#generalisedorrsommerfeld){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedorrsommerfeld"}, [\[generalisedsquire\]](#generalisedsquire){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedsquire"}) in *Taylor variables*, \((\hat t, \hat y, \hat \varphi, \hat u_r, \hat u_{\varphi}, \hat u_x)\), defined through \[\hat t = \frac{t}{Re}; \hat y = y; \hat \varphi = \varphi; \hat x = x; \hat u_r = u_r \frac{Re}{\epsilon_R}; \hat u_{\varphi} = u_{\varphi}; \hat u_x = u_x \frac{Re}{\epsilon_R}, \label{defntaylorvariables}\] before proceeding to the limit \(S \rightarrow \infty\). One then gets the *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld, Squire and Continuity equations in Taylor variables* which we write as \[\hat D \mathbf {\hat u} = \mathbf 0, \label{generalisedossqcontintaylorvariables}\] where the expressions for the elements of the operator \(\hat D\) in ([\[generalisedossqcontintaylorvariables\]](#generalisedossqcontintaylorvariables){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedossqcontintaylorvariables"}) follow from a comparison of this equation with its detailed breakdown given below.\
**The generalised Orr-Sommerfeld equation for large swirl** \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial}{\partial \hat t} \left[ \left(-\frac{\partial^2 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat y^2}-\frac{\partial^2 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat x^2} \right)-\epsilon_R \frac{\partial \hat u_r}{\partial \hat y} + Re \left(\frac{\partial^2 \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat y \partial \hat \varphi}-\frac{\partial \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat \varphi}\right) \right] \nonumber \\ + \frac{U_{Gx}}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} Re \left[ \left(-\frac{\partial^3 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat y^2 \partial \hat x}-\frac{\partial^3 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat x^3} \right) + \epsilon_R \left( \frac{\partial ^3 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat y^2 \partial \hat \varphi}-\frac{\partial ^2 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat y \partial \hat x}\right) + Re \left( \frac{\partial ^2 \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat y \partial \hat \varphi} \right) \right] \nonumber \\ + \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{d U_{Gx}}{dy} \left[ \epsilon_R Re \frac{\partial \hat u_r}{\partial \hat x} + Re^2 \frac{\partial ^2 \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat \varphi \partial \hat x} \right] + \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{d^2 U_{Gx}}{dy^2} Re \frac{\partial \hat u_r}{\partial \hat x} \nonumber \\ + \frac{S }{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} U_{G \varphi} \left[\epsilon_R Re \left(-\frac{\partial ^3 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat y^2 \partial \hat \varphi}-\frac{\partial ^3 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat x^2 \partial \varphi} \right) + 2 Re^2 \frac{\partial ^2 \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat x^2} \right] \nonumber \\ + \frac{S \epsilon_R}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{d U_{G \varphi}}{dy} Re \left[ \left( \frac{\partial ^2 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat y \partial \hat \varphi} + \frac{\partial ^2 \hat u_x}{\partial \hat x \partial \hat \varphi} \right) \right] + \frac{S \epsilon_R}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{d^2 U_{G \varphi}}{d y^2} \left[Re \frac{\partial \hat u_r}{\partial \hat \varphi} \right] \nonumber \\ + \left[ \left( \frac{\partial^4 \hat u_r }{\partial \hat x^4} + \frac{\partial^4 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat y^4} + 2 \frac{\partial^4 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat x^2 \partial \hat y^2} \right) + \epsilon_R Re \cdot 2 \frac{\partial^3 \hat u_r}{\partial \hat y \partial \hat x^2} + Re \cdot 2 \frac{\partial ^3 \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat y^3} \right] = 0. \label{generalisedorrsommerfeldintaylorvariables3} \end{aligned}\]\
**The generalised Squire equation for large swirl** \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial^2 \hat u_{\varphi}}{ \partial \hat t \partial \hat x} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} U_{Gx} \left[Re \frac{\partial^2 \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat x^2} \right] + \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{dU_{Gx}}{dy} \left[ \epsilon_R \frac{\partial \hat u_r}{\partial \hat x} \right] \nonumber \\ + \frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} U_{G \varphi} \left[ \epsilon_R Re \frac{\partial ^2 \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat \varphi \partial \hat x} \right] + \left[\frac{\partial^3 \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat x^3} + \frac{\partial^3 \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat x \partial \hat y^2} \right] + \epsilon_R \frac{\partial ^2 \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat x \partial \hat y} = 0. \label{generalisedsquireintaylorvariables3} \end{aligned}\] **The Continuity equation for large swirl** \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial \hat u_r}{\partial \hat y}+ \epsilon_R \hat u_r + Re \frac{\partial \hat u_{\varphi}}{\partial \hat \varphi} + \frac{\partial \hat u_x}{\partial \hat x} = 0. \label{generalisedcontinuityintaylorvariables3} \end{aligned}\] It may be verified that, proceeding now to the limit \(S \rightarrow \infty\), the above set of equations, ([\[generalisedorrsommerfeldintaylorvariables3\]](#generalisedorrsommerfeldintaylorvariables3){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedorrsommerfeldintaylorvariables3"}, [\[generalisedsquireintaylorvariables3\]](#generalisedsquireintaylorvariables3){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedsquireintaylorvariables3"}, [\[generalisedcontinuityintaylorvariables3\]](#generalisedcontinuityintaylorvariables3){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedcontinuityintaylorvariables3"}) get reduced for toroidal disturbances, \(\frac{\partial}{\partial \varphi} = 0\), to the equations set up by for the classical problem of stability of the flow in the gap between rotating cylinders. It may be noted in this context that \(Re^2\) may be replaced by the Taylor number \(Ta\), and \(Re\) by \(\sqrt{Ta}\) since \(Re^2 = Ta\), see eg. .
# Discussion, Conclusions and Outlook
The set of *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld, Squire and Continuity* equations derived, ([\[generalisedossqcont\]](#generalisedossqcont){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedossqcont"}) or ([\[generalisedorrsommerfeld\]](#generalisedorrsommerfeld){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedorrsommerfeld"}, [\[generalisedsquire\]](#generalisedsquire){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedsquire"}, [\[generalisedcontinuity\]](#generalisedcontinuity){reference-type="ref" reference="generalisedcontinuity"}) with homogeneous boundary conditions for \(\mathbf A\), is an eigenvalue problem for the complex frequency \(\omega = \omega_r + \imath \omega_i\) that depends upon the three parameters, \((Re, S, \epsilon_R)\) and the mode of the disturbance, \(n_{\varphi}\). In the present state of the art this eigenvalue problem is not tractable through analytical means that extract the nature of the dependence of the eigenvalues on the parameters, making it inevitable to obtain this information only numerically. The task then remaining is to extract the *globally critical Reynolds number* out of the *neutrally stable surfaces* defined through \(\omega _i (Re, S, \epsilon_R) = 0\) over the entire range of possible modes \(n_{\varphi}\). The computational task involved is too voluminous to be accomodated within the present short paper. It is therefore meaningful to focus attention in this paper on such inferences on the characteristics of transition that can be drawn directly from the equations themselves. A point that seems to have been overlooked in published literature up to now is that in both the limiting cases, which belong to classical problems of flow transition, the set of known and well established equations governing small-amplitude disturbance propagation may be understood as approximations of one and the same set of equations. These are obtainable from the set of *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld, Squire and Continuity* for basic flows with helical streamlines viewed in the revised parameter space. The well known equations for the particular cases of transition in plane channel flow and for *Taylor instability* in the flow in the gap between concentric circular cylinders with rotation of the inner cylinder are both recoverable from the *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld, Squire and Continuity equations* on setting the *Swirl parameter*, \(S\), to either \(0\) or \(\infty\) respectively. A feature of interest brought out by the set of *generalised Orr-Sommerfeld, Squire and Continuity equations* themselves follows from a cursory inspection of the coefficient of the second derivative of \(A_r\) in ([\[reorderedgeneralisedossqcont\]](#reorderedgeneralisedossqcont){reference-type="ref" reference="reorderedgeneralisedossqcont"}), analogous to the case of the basic flow with straight and parallel streamlines. A *critical layer* may then arise when transition occurs at a sufficiently high Reynolds number and the coefficient of the second derivative of \(A_r\) passes through zero. It is worth noting in this context that it is the Reynolds number based on \(U_{ref}\) that is decisive, and this depends upon both the characteristic velocities of the problem on hand, *viz.* \(U_{refx}\) and \(U_{ref \varphi}\). It follows herefrom that the *location of the critical layer* is governed not merely by the swirl and geometric parameters, \(S\) and \(\epsilon_R\), but also by the *mode of the disturbance*, describable through \(n_{\varphi}\). Furthermore, the *thickness of the critical layer* scales with \(Re^{-\frac{1}{3}}\) a result that, although formally is the same as in the classical case of no swirl, expresses dependence on swirl since \(Re\) is formed with \(U_{ref}\) which in turn depends upon both the characteristic velocities \(U_{refx}\) and \(U_{ref \varphi}\). The question that then arises, as to whether the *transition initiating disturbance of the spiral flow at given values of \(S\) and \(\epsilon_R\)* is *toroidal* or *helical*, remains open at this stage. Answering this question calls for a comparison of the *local critical Reynolds numbers*, which are neutrally stable points in the (\(S, \epsilon_R\))-space at which \(\frac{dRe}{d \lambda_x} = 0\), over the range of interest of \(S\) and \(\epsilon_R\) for different modes of disturbance \(n_{\varphi}\). Such a comparison of the *local critical Reynolds numbers* calls first for obtaining values for the *local critical Reynolds numbers* over a wide range of values of (\(S, \epsilon_R\)) for different modes, \(n_\varphi\), which, in the present state of the art, can be done only numerically. The finding from the present analysis may be summaised as follows:\
The conclusion that the *critical layer*, when it arises, is located at a wall distance where the axial flow velocity and the disturbance wave speed equal each other holds only when the transition initiating disturbance is toroidal in nature, not helical. Whether the *transition initiating disturbance* is toroidal \((n_{\varphi}=0)\) or helical and with which value of \(n_{\varphi} \ne 0\), would depend upon the *Swirl parameter*, \(S\), and the ratio of the gap width to the mean radius, \(\epsilon_R\), and this requires numerically solving the eigenvalue problem and analysing the solutions obtained. The author gratefully acknowledges the benefit of discussions with Professors Roddam Narasimha, FRS, K. R. Sreenivasan and Jeanette Hussong on the subject of this paper.
# Appendix: The generalised Orr-Sommerfeld, Squire and Continuity equations in fully developed annular spiral flows {#appendix-the-generalised-orr-sommerfeld-squire-and-continuity-equations-in-fully-developed-annular-spiral-flows .unnumbered}
**The generalised Orr-Sommerfeld equation** \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left[-\frac{\partial^2 u_r}{\partial r^2}-\frac{\partial^2 u_r}{\partial x^2}-\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial u_r}{\partial r} + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^2 u_{\varphi}}{\partial r \partial \varphi}-\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial u_{\varphi}}{\partial \varphi} + O(r^{-2}) \right] \nonumber \\ + \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} U_{Gx}\left[\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial^3 u_r}{\partial r^2 \partial \varphi }-\frac{\partial^3 u_r}{\partial r^2 \partial x}-\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^2 u_r}{\partial r \partial x}-\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^2 u_{\varphi}}{\partial r \partial \varphi} -\frac{\partial^3 u_r}{\partial x^3} + O(r^{-2}) \right] \nonumber \\ + \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{d U_{Gx}}{dr} \left[ \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial u_r}{\partial x} + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^2 u_{\varphi}}{\partial \varphi \partial x} + O(r^{-2}) \right] + \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{d^2 U_{Gx}}{dr^2} \frac{\partial u_r}{\partial x} \nonumber \\ + \frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} U_{G \varphi} \left[-\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial ^3 u_r}{\partial r^2 \partial \varphi}-\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial ^3 u_r}{\partial x^2 \partial \varphi} + \frac{2}{r} \frac{\partial ^2 u_\varphi}{\partial x^2} + O(r^{-2}) \right] \nonumber \\ + \frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{d U_{G \varphi}}{dr} \left[\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^2 u_r}{\partial r \partial \varphi} + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^2 u_x}{\partial x \partial \varphi} + O(r^{-2}) \right] + \frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{d^2 U_{G \varphi}}{d r^2} \left[ \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial u_r}{\partial \varphi} \right] \nonumber \\ + \frac{1}{Re} \left[\frac{\partial^4 u_r }{\partial x^4} + \frac{\partial^4 u_r}{\partial r^4} + 2 \frac{\partial^4 u_r}{\partial x^2 \partial r^2} + \frac{2}{r} \frac{\partial^3 u_r}{\partial r \partial x^2} + \frac{2}{r}\frac{\partial^3 u_{\varphi} }{\partial r^3} \right] = 0. \label{generalisedorrsommerfeld} \end{aligned}\] **The generalised Squire equation** \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left[\frac{\partial u_{\varphi}}{\partial x}-\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial u_x}{\partial \varphi} \right] + \frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} U_{Gx} \left[\frac{\partial^2 u_{\varphi}}{\partial x^2} + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial u_r}{\partial r} + O(r^{-2}) \right] \nonumber \\ +\frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{dU_{Gx}}{dr} \left[\frac{\partial u_r}{\partial x} \right] \nonumber + \frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} U_{G \varphi} \left[ \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial ^2 u_{\varphi}}{\partial \varphi \partial x}-\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial ^2 u_x}{\partial \varphi ^2} + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial u_r}{\partial x} \right] \nonumber \\-\frac{S}{\sqrt{(1+S^2)}} \frac{d U_{G \varphi}}{dr} \left[\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial u_r}{\partial \varphi} \right] \nonumber +\frac{1}{Re} \left[\frac{\partial^3 u_{\varphi}}{\partial x^3} + \frac{\partial^3 u_{\varphi}}{\partial x \partial r^2} + \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial^2 u_{\varphi}}{\partial x \partial r}-\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^3 u_x}{\partial x^2 \partial \varphi}-\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial^3 u_x}{\partial r^2 \partial \varphi} \right]=0. \nonumber \\ \label{generalisedsquire} \end{aligned}\] **The Continuity equation** \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial (r u_r)}{\partial r} + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial u_{\varphi}}{\partial \varphi} + \frac{\partial u_x}{\partial x} = 0. \label{generalisedcontinuity} \end{aligned}\] | {'timestamp': '2017-08-22T02:10:04', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01716', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01716'} |
null | null |
null | null |
# Introduction {#introduction .unnumbered}
Presently, density functional theory (DFT) dominates the field of atomistic and molecular quantum chemistry calculations. This is mainly due to its relatively low computational cost compared to many other atomistic approaches. The mainstream DFT (i.e. Kohn-Sham DFT (KS-DFT) ) is a slight alteration of the original work of Hohenberg and Kohn (HK-DFT) where it was proved that the ground state of any many-electron system is completely characterized by its density and the energy functional which permits the system to attain its minimum at the density corresponding to the ground state. However, representing the contribution of the kinetic energy as a density functional (KEDF) [(\(T\left[ \rho\left( \textbf{x} \right) \right] = \int t \left( \textbf{x} \right) d\textbf{x}\)) where \(t \left( \textbf{x} \right)\) is the kinetic energy density (KED)]{style="color: black"} has proven to be challenging as the accuracy and applicability of the presently proposed KEDF are generally not sufficient for reliable calculations. So, Kohn and Sham (KS-DFT) suggested an approximate approach where the "orbitals" are reintroduced such that the sum of the orbitals densities equals to the exact density of the real system and the kinetic energy is defined as the kinetic energy of the introduced "fictitious" system. Computation-wise, this results in a conversion of the problem from 3-dimensional (3D) to \(3N\)-dimensional where \(N\) orbitals are determined by solving the governing \(N\)-3D equations self-consistently and \(N\) is the number of electrons in the calculations. Recently, the search for an *orbital-free* version of DFT (OF-DFT) has rapidly gained attention. To apply "orbital free" approaches, it is essential to find highly accurate kinetic energy density functionals (KEDF). The subject is not new and its origins date back to the early years of quantum mechanics. Most of the early proposed KEDF are based on particular exactly solvable models, e.g. constant potential with plainwaves solution for Thomas-Fermi model (TF) or modified planewaves for von Weizsacker KEDF (vW). This period was followed by many extensions and further developments on "specific physical models". For a comprehensive collection of suggested functionals, we refer the reader to a review by Tran and Wesolowski. Alternatively, some of the recent developments adopted statistical techniques. For example, Burke and coworkers recently used machine learning to approximate density functional based on statistical expressions. In this paper, we revisit this from a different perspective. Instead of starting from a specific physical model or using mathematical tools to improve a KEDF, we begin by asking which forms of KEDF are physically acceptable. To answer this query, an axiomatic approach is used to determine the physically acceptable forms in a general \(D\)-dimension space. In axiomatic approaches, a set of axioms are used in conjunction to derive equations, expressions, or theorems. As expected, the resulted expansion captures most of the known forms of one-point KEDFs. By statistically training the forms for a model problem of the non-interacting kinetic energy in 1D (6 terms only), we find that the mean relative accuracy for 1000 randomly generated potentials is orders of magnitudes better than that delivered by standard KEDFs. The accuracy improves with the number of occupied states, and it is better than \(10^{-4}\) at four occupied states. Furthermore, it is shown that the free fitting of the coefficients associated with known KEDFs approaches the exactly known values.
Herein, an axiomatic approach is used to derive an expansion of physically acceptable forms of KEDF that satisfy the following essential physical requirements; dimensionality, finiteness, compatibility with the virial theorem, and non-negativity of \(t \left( \textbf{x} \right)\). Also, the functional derivative of the final expansion will be derived as it is needed for efficient energy minimization.
## The expression of \(t \left( \textbf{x} \right)\) as a function of density derivatives {#the-expression-of-t-left-textbfx-right-as-a-function-of-density-derivatives .unnumbered}
Generally, \(t \left( \textbf{x} \right)\) can be defined as a scalar function of the density and its derivative, i.e. \[\label{GEF} t\left( \textbf{x} \right) \equiv f \left( \rho, \nabla \rho, \nabla^2 \rho, \dotsm, \nabla^{(n)} \rho \right) \,.\] For the 1-dimensional case (1D), Shao and Baltin proved that the highest derivative order is 1 and all the derivatives for \(n>1\) must be ruled out based on the compatibility with the differential virial theorem and \(t \left( \textbf{x} \right)\) non-negativity. The same concept can be further extended to \(D\)-dimensional cases. [Here, we outline Shao and Baltin proof for 1D case and how it is extended to \(D\)-dimension. In 1D, the differential virial theorem of fermionic system with Coulombic interaction is \[\label{DVT1D} \rho(x) v'(x) = \dfrac{1}{4} \rho'''-2 \, t'(x) \,.\] At the beginning, we need to represent the above equation in terms of the density and its derivatives only. \(t'(x)\), which is directly obtained from Eq. [\[GEF\]](#GEF){reference-type="ref" reference="GEF"} (for 1D), is \[\label{R2} t'(x) = \sum_{\nu=0}^n \rho^{(\nu+1)} \frac{\partial f}{\partial \rho^{(\nu)}}\] As for \(v'(x)\), it is obtained by taking the derivative of Euler equation when applying Eq. [\[GEF\]](#GEF){reference-type="ref" reference="GEF"} within DFT framework. So, \[\frac{d}{dx}\left( \frac{\delta E[\rho]}{\delta \rho} \right)=0\] and hence \[\label{R3} v'(x) =-\frac{d}{dx} \left( \frac{\delta E[\rho]}{\delta \rho} \right) = \sum_{\nu=0}^n (-1)^{\nu+1} \frac{d^{\nu+1}}{dx^{\nu+1}} \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial \rho^{(\nu)}} \right)\] Here, we used the fact that the chemical potential \(\mu\) is constant and hence its derivative is zero. By inserting Eq. [\[R2\]](#R2){reference-type="ref" reference="R2"} and Eq. [\[R3\]](#R3){reference-type="ref" reference="R3"} in Eq. [\[DVT1D\]](#DVT1D){reference-type="ref" reference="DVT1D"}, it becomes \[\sum_{\nu=0}^n \left[ (-1)^{\nu+1} \rho \frac{d^{\nu+1}}{dx^{\nu+1}} \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial \rho^{(\nu)}} \right) + 2 \rho^{(\nu+1)} \frac{\partial f}{\partial \rho^{(\nu)}} \right] = \dfrac{1}{4} \rho'''\] Finally, the left hand side of the above equation are rearranged and due to the fact that only \(\rho'''\) appears on the right hand side, it is found that for any \(n \geq 2\), \[\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial \left[\rho^{(n)}\right]^2} = 0 \,.\] This implies that \(f\) must be linear with respect of \(\rho^{(n)}\). This clearly violates the non-negativity of KED and hence the dependence of \(f\) on \(\rho^{(n)}\) must be ruled out.]{style="color: black"}
With further arrangement and because only \(\frac{d}{dx_\alpha} \left( \nabla^2 \rho \right)\) term appears on the right hand side, it can be shown that \[\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial \left[\nabla^n \rho\right]^2} = 0 \,.\] for \(n \geq 2\). Again, this implies that \(f\) must be linear with respect of \(\nabla^n \rho\) and this clearly violates the non-negativity of KED. Thus, it must be ruled out.
[\[T1\]]{#T1 label="T1"}
The considered class of potentials is the one used by Burke and coworkers which consists of three different Gaussian dips (GD) confined to a 1D box of length \(L=1\) and between two infinite walls. This class of potentials possesses the functional form: \[\label{v1} v(x) =-\sum_{i=1}^3 a_i \exp \left[ \dfrac{-\left( x-b_i \right)^2 }{2 c_i^2} \right] \quad,\] where \(a_i\), \(b_i\), and \(c_i\) are generated randomly, and obey the following constraints: \(1<a<10\), \(0.4<b<0.6\), and \(0.03<c<0.1\). An efficient spectral method is used to solve for the states and hence the densities with an accuracy greater than \(10^{-12}\) for the exact non-interacting kinetic energy (\(T_s\)) .
## \(T[\rho]\) calculated using the density numerically obtained through solving the Schrödinger equation {#trho-calculated-using-the-density-numerically-obtained-through-solving-the-schrödinger-equation .unnumbered}
A thousand potentials are generated and solved; the exact \(T_s\) is then calculated for various numbers of occupied states (\(N=2,\,3,\,4,\,5\)). The Exact \(T_s\) are used to find the best least square fitting for the expansion coefficients. Figure-[\[F02\]](#F02){reference-type="ref" reference="F02"} gives the performance of the expansion in terms of mean relative error (\(|T_s-\int_0^L t(\rho(x)) dx|/T_s\)). The top three piles are for full fitting where three upper limits of \(s\) are assumed; namely 0, 1, and 2. The middle set of three piles are for the case where we use \(a_{00}=\pi^2/24\) and \(a_{02}=1/8\) to enforce the TF and vW (TFvW) limits, respectively. The last three piles are for the standard TF, vW, and TFvW models. Clearly, the new expansion (Eq.[\[DExp\]](#DExp){reference-type="ref" reference="DExp"}) results in better performance when compared to the standard models by at least two orders of magnitude. The accuracy is improved further as the number of the occupied states increases. Also, it is clear that the consideration of the spatial extension of the density--by using \(r_d\)--improves the estimation even further. Note that only 4 parameters (6 under the case of full fitting) are needed to very accurately estimate the non-interacting kinetic energy for 1000 potentials with four different occupied states. The second analysis was designed to test the validity of the expansion. At the beginning, 1000 training potentials are used to find the expansion coefficients. These are then used to estimate \(T\) directly for another 1000 test potentials for \(N=2,\,3,\,4,\,5\). The results are shown in Figure-[\[F03\]](#F03){reference-type="ref" reference="F03"} where the left histograms (blue) are for the training set while the right histograms (green) are for the test set. The left column is for full fitting while the right column is for the case where \(a_{00}\) and \(a_{02}\) are set to \(\pi^2/24\) and \(1/8\) and only 4 parameters are statically determined. Here, the error is given in kcal/mol. Distinctly, the statistically trained expansion coefficients were able to estimate \(T_s\) very accurately. The errors mean absolute, standard deviation, and max absolute are shown in Table-2 and are given in kcal/mol. However, they are still much beyond the chemical accuracy limit (1 kcal/mol). Furthermore and as aforementioned, the family of potentials used is the same as was used by Burke and coworkers to find KEDF with machine learning. In that work, they used a process containing around 100,000 empirical parameters. They achieved accuracies below 1 kcal/mol and two order of magnitudes better than what is obtained in this work. However to iterate, in this work we used only 6 parameters.
[\[Table2\]]{#Table2 label="Table2"}
## \(T[\rho]\) calculated using the density resulted from DFT minimization {#trho-calculated-using-the-density-resulted-from-dft-minimization .unnumbered}
In the previous subsection, the exact density (as calculated using high order spectral methods) are used to estimate the kinetic energy. However in DFT, it is essential to find the density that minimize the energy while maintaining the number of involved particles. There are many possible techniques. In this work, we use a gradient-based trust-region self-consistent method. Figure-[\[F04\]](#F04){reference-type="ref" reference="F04"} shows the calculated densities resulted from energy minimization using both full fitting and the fitting with forced TFvW beside the exact density for two randomly generated potentials and for various number of occupied states (\(N=\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2, 3, 4, as 5). It is clear that the suggested \(t\left( x \right)\) (as tested in 1D cases) accurately produces the minimum densities. Also, the results of full fitting are better that those of the fitting with imposed TFvW parameters. However, the main outcome is its capacity to maintain the shell structure, which is challenging for the standard approximation based on TFvW models. Energy minimization is then applied to find the densities and the kinetic energies of the 1000 systems used in the previous subsection for \(N=2,\,3,\,4,\,5\). The results are shown in Figure-[\[Fig5\]](#Fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="Fig5"} where the left column shows the relative error while the right column shows the absolute error in kcal/mol. In each panel, the left side (blue) is for the full fitting while the right one (green) is for the fitting with TFvW imposed. As can be seen, the error is less than 1% and in most cases, it is less than 0.1%. However, this is large as absolute value. Also as observed in the previous subsection, it is clear that full fitting results in more accurate calculations as expected from the calculated densities by DFT minimization. There could be many causes for the increased accuracy beside the additional degrees of freedom allowed by full fitting. However, we believe that this could be a numerical error due to the shape optimization. This becomes more apparent for higher occupied states.
## On the expansion coefficients {#on-the-expansion-coefficients .unnumbered}
As stated earlier, the expansion coefficients are determined statistically in this work. However, they must be universal. The only two known parameters are \(a_{00}\) which equal to \(\pi^2/24\) (TF KEDF) and \(a_{02}\) which equal to \(1/8\) (vW KEDF). vW KEDF must be equal to \(T_s\) for single occupied states. Thus, a fitting for various potentials with single occupied state must get reduced to vW KEDF. This was obtained for various number of training potentials while the other expansion coefficients in this case are fitted trivially to zero. However, they must not all vanish. Rather, the collective contributions of all the other KEDF terms--in this limit--must vanish. In the other extreme, by increasing the number of the occupied states, \(a_{00}\) approaches the TF limit as shown in Figure-[\[F03\]](#F03){reference-type="ref" reference="F03"}. In this analysis, the employed potentials are: a particle in a box (PiB) of a width of 1; a simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) with \(\omega=1\); and three randomly generated DG potentials (Eq.[\[v1\]](#v1){reference-type="ref" reference="v1"}) but with a scaling of \(L\), \(b_i\), and \(c_i\) by factors of 1, 2, and 3. The exactly solvable models (i.e. PiB and SHO) expeditiously reached the exact limit and the resulted \(a_{00}\)'s for both are hardly distinguishable. The other expansion coefficients shall be determined by physical considerations rather than statistical fitting. This is one of many imperative goals and should permit implementing the \"OF-DFT\" forms to calculate the non-interacting kinetic energy in KS-DFT without solving the computationally expensive KS equations. Also, the expansion shall be implemented within a real 3D environment by application to the Coulombic potentials, where there are 15 expansion terms.
# Conclusion {#conclusion .unnumbered}
The general expansion--which was derived axiomatically through considering physical necessities--can become a systematic approach to develop density functionals, one of the main challenges existing in the field. This shall reattain the 3D nature of DFT calculations (i.e. OF-DFT), which shall permit conduction of large-scale calculations which were inconceivable by KS-DFT. For example, Gavini and others studied metallic systems with multi-million atoms by using OF-DFT. And recently, EA Carter and others analyzed a system of more than 1 million lithium atoms. However, using OF-DFT with the standard KEDF for non-metallic system is inaccurate as they are known to be sufficient only for nearly-uniform density systems like metals. So, the proposed KEDF expansion should allow a systematic improvement of OF-DFT accuracy and applicability. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-08T02:01:55', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01957', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01957'} |
# Introduction
The physics of excitons and associated optical phenomena was greatly influenced by recent discoveries in the domain of transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) materials \[\]. They can both exist in the bulk and monolayer configurations and possess a set of peculiar properties which differ them from other semiconductor materials. TMD monolayers are of particular interest in this context---they are atomically thin, are characterized by the direct bandgap favorable for optical interband transitions and exciton formation and demonstrate peculiar interplay of spin and valley effects. All this give them certain advantages for the use in optoelectronics as compared to semimetallic graphene. Extensive studies of excitonic properties of TMD monolayers started immediately after their discovery \[\]. In striking contrast to bulk and quasi-2D structures, the different screening in 2D monolayer governs the deviation of the interparticle Coulomb interaction from the standard form, and ultimately leads to unusual properties of the excitons in TMD structures \[\]. The exciton binding energies and absorption spectra in various TMD monolayers were measured experimentally \[\] and calculated from the first principles \[\]. The results have shown huge increase of the exciton binding energy (up to 1 eV) \[\], as compared to conventional semiconductors, and the non-hydrogenic behavior of the excitonic series \[\]. Further investigations cover measurements of exciton lifetimes and linewidths in monolayers \[\], as well as electric field control of the excitonic properties \[\]. Moreover, the rich many-body physics in TMD materials was confirmed by observation of more complex particles, such as trions and biexcitons \[\] as well as interlayer excitons in bilayer structures \[\]. Additionally, the hybrid exciton-electron systems in TMDs were considered \[\]. Excellent optical properties of TMD monolayers put them as a prominent platform for optoelectronical applications. For instance, the large binding energy of excitons allowed to study excitonic physics at elevated temperatures, and observe the excitons with high principal quantum numbers \[\]. The large oscillator strength allows to couple excitons strongly to an optical microcavity mode, and study strong light-matter coupling at room temperature \[\]. The particular spin-orbit interaction for the bands leads to non-trivial valley dynamics and spin properties, also suggested to be potentially interesting for the quantum information processing \[\]. Finally, \(\chi_2\) nonlinear response of TMD monolayers was predicted, making it suitable for the observation of the nonlinear quantum optical effects \[\]. | {'timestamp': '2017-08-22T02:13:45', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01817', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01817'} |
# Introduction {#sec:intro}
In targeted online advertising, the main goal is to figure out the best opportunities by showing an advertisement to an online user, who is most likely to take a desired action, such as ordering a product or signing up for an account. The complexity of realizing this goal is so high that advertisers need specialized technology solutions called demand-side platforms (DSP). In a DSP, each individual advertiser usually sets up a list of campaigns that can be thought of as plans for delivering advertisements. For each campaign, the advertiser specifies the characteristics of the audience segments that she would like to target (e.g., males, ages 18-35, who view news articles on espn.com) along with the particular media that she would like to display to the target audience (e.g., a video ad for beer). In addition, the advertiser specifies a budget amount, time schedule, pacing details, and performance goals for each campaign. The performance goals typically can be specified by minimizing cost-per-click (CPC) or cost-per-action (CPA). The DSP manages its active campaigns for many different advertisers simultaneously across multiple ad exchanges where ad impressions can be acquired through a real-time bidding (RTB) process. In the RTB process, the DSP interacts with several ad exchanges where bids are placed for potential impressions on behalf of those advertisers. This interaction happens in real time when an ad request is submitted to an ad exchange (which may happen, for example, when a user views a news story on a webpage). In this scenario, the DSP needs to offer a solution to decide, among the list of all campaigns associated with its advertiser clients, which campaign to bid on behalf of and how much to offer for the corresponding bid. The fundamental problem we consider here is how to make these decisions in real time to maximize the profit for the DSP while ensuring that all of its advertiser clients are satisfied. Generally speaking, today most DSPs offer different pricing models and enhancement schemes to help advertisers manage their campaigns. Those pricing models include cost per thousand impressions (CPM), cost per click (CPC) and cost per action (CPA). Advertisers often like to choose the CPC/CPA pricing model because the return on investment (ROI) is always positive. However, this pricing model might introduce revenue loss for the DSP since the DSP only earns revenue when a click or action occurs. Therefore, in CPC/CPA pricing model, the DSP needs to convert the CPC/CPA bid to an expected cost per thousand impressions (eCPM) bid in order to sensibly participate in auctions in the RTB exchanges. In this paper, we focus on CPC/CPA pricing model as it is a very challenging problem for the DSP. It is challenging for a DSP to perform such profit optimization with CPC/CPA pricing model in a RTB environment for several reasons. First, top DSPs typically receive as many as a million ad requests per second. The short latency and high throughput requirements introduce extreme time sensitivity on the process. Second, a large amount of information is missing in the real time evaluation of the individual ad requests, e.g., the feedback on previous decisions normally has a long delay in practice. Therefore, most of the DSPs today only apply a greedy approach by selecting the ad with the highest bid among all the qualified ads for each incoming request. In this paper, we propose a novel approach based on a precise mathematical formulation to optimize the overall DSP profit. We appropriately model the uncertainty in impression arrival, auction, and click/action processes and develop an optimization formulation to maximize profit for the DSP while ensuring that each campaign remains under budget. Our formulation is aimed at optimizing with respect to both impression allocation and bid price decisions, and due to the additional complexity of accounting for both of these decisions the formulation is a large-scale, nonconvex model. However, due to the properties of second-price auctions we are able to effectively use the technique of Lagrangian relaxation. We construct a dual problem and establish that subgradients of the dual function may be efficiently computed. Our overall approach is based on a two-phase procedure, wherein we solve the dual problem in the first phase and use the dual solution to naturally recover a primal solution in the second phase. We conduct several computational experiments on synthetic datasets and demonstrate that our Lagrangian relaxation based approach is able to significantly increase DSP profits relative to a baseline greedy approach. Revenue optimization in online advertising has been extensively studied in recent literature from different perspectives, such as optimization, game theory and mechanism design, and contract design. Due to space limitations, we only review several directly relevant papers. focus on the publisher's revenue management problem. Specifically, study how publishers should optimally trade off guaranteed contracts with RTB. studies how a publisher should optimally allocate impressions and set up bid prices for campaigns, under the implicit assumption that the publisher is a "central planner". On the other hand, studies ad networks' revenue management problem based on model predictive control. Finally, studies advertisers' optimal bidding problem in RTB. Unlike our paper, focuses on optimal bidding and its framework does not consider impression allocation. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section [2](#sec:model){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:model"}, we describe the notation and problem statement and we set up the model. The profit optimization formulation is presented in Section [3](#sec:optalg){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:optalg"}. Our proposed Lagrangian relaxation based algorithm to approximately solve the profit optimization problem is specified in Section [4](#sec:LAD){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:LAD"}. Experimental results are presented in Section [5](#sec:expts){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:expts"}, and we conclude with some remarks about possible future work.
# Model Foundations {#sec:model}
We assume that the planning takes place over a fixed time horizon (e.g., 24 hours). To simplify the presentation, we also assume that the DSP interacts with a single ad exchange. For our purposes, the ad exchange simply represents a pool of potential impressions that the DSP may bid on. Thus, in the likely scenario that the DSP interacts with more than one ad exchange, we may simply group all of the different ad exchanges together into a representative ad exchange. Let \(\mathcal{I}\) denote the set of *impression types* and let \(\mathcal{K}\) denote the set of all campaigns associated with advertisers managed by the DSP. Before discussing the details of our assumptions, let us describe the basic flow of events in the model. When an impression of type \(i \in \mathcal{I}\) is submitted to the ad exchange, a real-time second-price auction is held for which the DSP has an opportunity to bid. Thus the DSP has an opportunity to make two strategic decisions related to each real-time auction: *(i)* how to select a campaign \(k \in \mathcal{K}\) to bid on behalf of in the auction, and *(ii)* how to set the corresponding bid price \(b_{ik}\). If the DSP wins the auction on behalf of campaign \(k\), then the DSP must pay the ad exchange an amount equal to the second largest price and an ad from campaign \(k\) is displayed. The advertiser corresponding to campaign \(k\) is charged only if a user clicks on the ad.
#### Impression Types
It is important that the set of impression types \(\mathcal{I}\) represents a partition of all possible impressions that are submitted to the ad exchange. Thus, every impression submitted to the ad exchange is associated with a particular impression type \(i \in \mathcal{I}\). It is most natural to define \(\mathcal{I}\) in terms of features associated with impressions. For example, if the DSP determines that there are only two relevant attributes associated with each impression--say gender and whether or not the viewer is 18 years or older--then the DSP would choose \(\mathcal{I} = \{(M, 18-), (M, 18+), (F, 18-), (F, 18+)\}\). Then, all impressions corresponding to male viewers who are under 18 years of age would be assigned to impression type \(i = (M, 18-)\), etc. Note that the construction of the set \(\mathcal{I}\) is part of the modeling process and consideration should be given to the trade-off between computational limitations and the potential for higher profits due to a more fine-grained construction of \(\mathcal{I}\). Nevertheless, the algorithmic schemes we propose in Section [3](#sec:optalg){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:optalg"} are scalable to problem instances where the size of \(\mathcal{I}\) is extremely large. We use the following notation and make the following assumptions about the impression types:
- Let \(S_i\) denote the number of impressions of type \(i\) that arrive during the planning horizon, and assume that \(S_i\) is a random variable with mean \(s_i\).
#### Campaigns
Recall that \(\mathcal{K}\) denotes the set of all campaigns that are managed by the DSP. That is, \(\mathcal{K}\) is the union over all advertisers (who are managed by the DSP) of the sets of campaigns run by each advertiser. We use the following notation and make the following assumptions about the campaigns:
- \(m_k\) denotes the (advertiser selected) budget for campaign \(k\) during the planning horizon.
- \(\mathcal{I}_k\) denotes the set of impression types that campaign \(k\) targets. For example, if an advertiser wishes to create a particular campaign to target female users, then in this case \(\mathcal{I}_k\) would denote the set of all impression types corresponding to female users (e.g., \(\mathcal{I}_k = \{(F, 18-), (F, 18+)\}\) in the example described above). Note that each advertiser can create multiple campaigns to achieve different targeting goals.
- In this model, it is assumed that advertisers are charged on a *CPC (cost per click)* basis. That is, campaign \(k\) is charged an amount \(q_k > 0\), called the CPC price, each time a user clicks on an advertisement from campaign \(k\). (Note that a "click" may also be thought of more generally as an "action" whereby our model easily extends to campaigns that are charged on a CPA basis. Moreover, our model may be easily extended to allow for multiple actions, each with their own rewards.)
#### Auctions
When an impression is submitted to the ad exchange, an instantaneous real-time auction occurs to determine who gets to display an advertisement. We assume that these are *second-price* auctions, which are very common in practice. In a second-price auction, the bidder who submits the highest bid is the winner, but the amount that the winner pays is the amount of the *second highest* bid. It is well known that, in a second-price auction, a dominant strategy for each participant is to bid truthfully. Herein we assume that the DSP takes a *probabilistic* approach to modeling the behavior of the other bidders in the auction. Namely, we make the following assumptions:
- For each impression type \(i \in I\), let \(B^{\max}_i\) be a random variable representing the maximum, among all other bidders excluding the DSP, of the bid prices entered in an auction for an impression of type \(i\). It is assumed that \(B^{\max}_i > 0\) with probability one. Let \(\rho_i(\cdot): \mathbb{R} \to [0,1]\) denote the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of \(B^{\max}_i\), so that \(\rho_i(b) := \mathbb{P}(B^{\max}_i \leq b)\) is the probability that the DSP wins an auction for an impression of type \(i\) when the DSP enters the bid \(b\). Note that the functions \(\rho_i(\cdot)\) are typically estimated using a bid landscape model (see, e.g., ). (In the case of a tie, here we assume that the DSP automatically wins the auction. Our framework may be easily adapted to the case of a fair tie-breaking mechanism.)
- Furthermore, let \(\beta^{\max}_i(b) := \mathbb{E}[B^{\max}_i ~|~ B^{\max}_i \leq b]\) denote the expected value of the second highest bid price (i.e., the value of the payment to the ad exchange) given that the DSP enters a bid price of \(b\) and \(b\) is the largest bid price entered.
#### Click Events
After the DSP has won an auction on behalf of campaign \(k\), an ad for campaign \(k\) is displayed to the user corresponding to the impression for which the auction was held. For a given impression type \(i \in \mathcal{I}\) and a given campaign \(k \in \mathcal{K}\), let \(\theta_{ik} \in [0,1]\) denote the *click-through-rate* for users corresponding to impression type \(i\) and when the ad corresponds to campaign \(k\). That is, \(\theta_{ik}\) represents the fraction of users corresponding to impression type \(i\) that click on an ad associated with campaign \(k\), i.e., the probability that the user clicks on the ad that is shown. Although the true click-through-rates are not available, the DSP is typically able to leverage a vast amount of historical data and use predictive models to produce accurate predictions of these values, even when \(\mathcal{K}\) and \(\mathcal{I}\) are extremely large (see, e.g., ). Finally, given an impression type \(i \in \mathcal{I}\) and a campaign \(k \in \mathcal{K}\), let \(r_{ik}\) denote the *expected cost per impression (eCPI)* value, namely \(r_{ik} := q_k\theta_{ik}\) where \(q_k\) is the CPC price defined earlier. Note that \(r_{ik}\) is the expected amount of revenue that the DSP earns each time an ad for campaign \(k\) is shown to an impression of type \(i\), and \(r_{ik}\) also corresponds to the optimal bid price when campaign \(k\) has unlimited budget.
#### Decision Variables and Additional Notation
As mentioned previously, when an auction for impression type \(i \in \mathcal{I}\) arrives to the ad exchange, the DSP decides which campaign \(k \in \mathcal{K}\) to bid of behalf of and also selects the value of the corresponding bid price. Let \(\mathcal{E} \subseteq \mathcal{I} \times \mathcal{K}\) denote the edges of an undirected bipartite graph between \(\mathcal{I}\) and \(\mathcal{K}\), whereby there is an edge \(e = (i, k) \in \mathcal{E}\) whenever campaign \(k\) targets impression type \(i\), i.e, \(\mathcal{E} := \{(i, k): i \in \mathcal{I}_k\}\). Let \(\mathcal{K}_i := \{k \in \mathcal{K}: (i, k) \in \mathcal{E}\}\) denote the set of campaigns that target impression type \(i\). When a new auction for impression type \(i\) arrives to the ad exchange, we say that the DSP selects campaign \(k\) for the auction if the DSP chooses to bid on behalf campaign \(k\) in the auction. For each edge \((i,k) \in \mathcal{E}\), we define two decision variables as follows: *(i)* \(x_{ik}\) is the probability that the DSP selects campaign \(k\), and *(ii)* \(b_{ik}\) is the corresponding bid price that the DSP submits in the auction. Interpreted differently, \(x_{ik}\) represents a proportional allocation, i.e., the fraction of auctions for impression type \(i\) that are allocated to campaign \(k\) on average. Note that \(b_{ik}\) represents the bid price that the DSP submits to an auction for impression type \(i\) *conditional* on the fact that the DSP has selected campaign \(k\) for the auction. Related approaches (e.g., as in ) also use bid prices to rank advertisers--in our approach, the selection of which campaign to bid on behalf of is completely captured by the \(x_{ik}\) decision variables and thus the \(b_{ik}\) decision variables only determine the actual bid price decisions. Let \(\bf{x}, \bf{b} \in \mathbb{R}^{|\mathcal{E}|}\) denote vectors of these quantities, which will represent decision variables in our model. Let us also define some additional notation used herein. For a given set \(S\) and a function \(f(\cdot): S \to \mathbb{R}\), let \(\arg\max_{x \in S} f(x)\) denote the (possibly empty) set of maximizers of the function \(f(\cdot)\) over the set \(S\). If \(f(\cdot): \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}\) is a convex function then, for a given \(x \in \mathbb{R}^n\), \(\partial f(x)\) denotes the set of subgradients of \(f(\cdot)\) at \(x\), i.e., the set of vectors \(g\) such that \(f(y) \geq f(x) + g^T(y-x)\) for all \(y \in \mathbb{R}^n\). Finally, let \(\mathbf{1}(\cdot)\) denote an indicator function that is equal to \(1\) whenever the argument of \(\mathbf{1}(\cdot)\) is true and equal to \(0\) otherwise.
# Optimization Formulation {#sec:optalg}
Problem [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} presents our formulation of the allocation and real-time bidding planning problem faced by the DSP. \[\label{poi_deterministic} \begin{array}{lcl} \underset{\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{b}}{\mathrm{maximize}} & & \displaystyle \sum_{(i,k) \in \mathcal{E}} [r_{ik}-\beta^{\max}_i(b_{ik})]s_ix_{ik}\rho_i(b_{ik}) \\ & & \\ \vspace{0.1cm} \mathrm{subject \ to} & & \textstyle \sum_{i \in \mathcal{I}_k}r_{ik}s_ix_{ik}\rho_i(b_{ik}) ~\leq~ m_k \ \ \forall k \in \mathcal{K} \\ \vspace{0.1cm} & & \textstyle \sum_{k \in \mathcal{K}_i} x_{ik} ~\leq~ 1 \ \ \forall i \in \mathcal{I} \\ & & \mathbf{x}, \mathbf{b} ~\geq~ 0 \. \end{array}\] Herein, let \(\pi(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{b}) := \sum_{(i,k) \in \mathcal{E}} [r_{ik}-\beta^{\max}_i(b_{ik})]s_ix_{ik}\rho_i(b_{ik})\) denote the objective function of [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"}. Let us now briefly describe the interpretation of each part of the formulation [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} above. First, note that the formulation is based on the idea of "deterministic approximation," whereby we assume that all random quantities deterministically take on their expected values. In this formulation, the DSP seeks to maximize its total profit over the planning horizon, while ensuring that each campaign does not spend more than its budget. Indeed, the expected number of times during the planning horizon that the DSP selects campaign \(k\) for an auction of impression type \(i\) is \(s_ix_{ik}\) and the expected number of such auctions that the DSP wins is \(s_ix_{ik}\rho_i(b_{ik})\). Furthermore, for each instance that the DSP selects campaign \(k\) and wins the corresponding auction for impression type \(i\), the expected profit for the DSP is \(r_{ik}-\beta^{\max}_i(b_{ik})\). Therefore, the objective function of [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} represents the expected total profit earned by the DSP throughout the planning horizon. The first set of constraints in [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} represent the *budget constraints* for the campaigns, which ensure that, in expectation, each campaign does not spend more than its pre-specified budget level. Finally, the second set of constraints in [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} are referred to as the *supply constraints* for the impression types, which (along with the nonnegativity constraints on \(\mathbf{x}\)) ensure that the variables \(\mathbf{x}\) represent valid probabilities. Note also that these probabilities may sum to a value strictly less than 1, in which case \(1-\sum_{k \in \mathcal{K}_i} x_{ik}\) represents the probability of electing not to bid when an impression of type \(i\) arrives to the ad exchange. For ease of notation, let us denote the supply and nonnegativity constraints on \(\mathbf{x}\) using \(\mathcal{S} := \left\{\mathbf{x}: \sum_{k \in \mathcal{K}_i} x_{ik} ~\leq~ 1 \ \text{for all } i \in \mathcal{I}, \ \mathbf{x} \geq 0\right\}\). Note that, due to the joint optimization over both \(\bf{x}\) and \(\bf{b}\), problem [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} is generally a nonconvex optimization problem (this is clearly evident, for example, when \(B^{\max}_i\) is taken to be uniformly distributed on \([0,1]\) and hence \(\rho_i(b_{ik}) = b_{ik}\) for \(b_{ik} \in [0,1]\)). Despite its nonconvexity, problem [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} does have some important structural properties that we now highlight. First, if we consider the bid prices \(\mathbf{b}\) to be fixed, then the resulting problem in \(\mathbf{x}\) is a *linear optimization* problem--in other words the objective function and constraints can all be expressed as linear functions of \(\mathbf{x}\)--and may be solved very efficiently using off-the-shelf solvers or perhaps a specialized algorithm. Conversely, if we consider \(\mathbf{x}\) to be fixed, then the resulting problem in \(\mathbf{b}\) is generally still nonconvex but the main "difficulty" arises from the budget constraints. Indeed, due to the presence of budget constraints, it may be optimal for the DSP to underbid on a relatively less valuable impression due to the possibility of a more valuable impression arriving in the future. Therefore, whenever a campaign has unlimited budget, it is optimal for the DSP to set \(b_{ik} = r_{ik}\), i.e., to bid truthfully. The following Proposition, which will be useful in the development of the Lagrangian relaxation algorithm in Section [4](#sec:LAD){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:LAD"}, formalizes this intuition.
# Lagrangian Dual and Algorithmic Scheme {#sec:LAD}
We begin this section with a high-level description of our approach for solving [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"}. Our algorithmic approach is based on a two phase procedure. In the first phase, we construct a suitable dual of [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"}, which turns out to be a convex optimization problem that can be efficiently solved with most subgradient based algorithms. A solution of the dual problem naturally suggests a way to set the bid prices \(\mathbf{b}\). In the second phase, we set the bid prices using the previously computed dual solution then we solve the linear optimization problem that results when \(\mathbf{b}\) is fixed in order to recover allocation probabilities \(\mathbf{x}\). Let us now construct a Lagrangian dual of the deterministic approximation problem [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} by relaxing the "difficult" budget constraints. We show that the resulting dual problem is a convex optimization problem with only very simple box constraints and that subgradients of the objective function may be efficiently computed. Since our formulation is quite general (for example, there are no strong assumptions made about the distribution of \(B^{\max}_i\)), we are unable to exploit any special structure of the dual function \(L^\ast(\cdot)\) and must resort to simple subgradient based algorithms to solve the dual problem. Nevertheless, subgradient methods offer the advantage of being highly scalable and parallelizable, and moreover our overall two phase procedure does not necessitate a high accuracy solution of the dual problem. To start, we introduce multipliers \(\lambda \in \mathbb{R}^{|\mathcal{K}|}_{+}\) for the budget constraints in [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} and form the Lagrangian function: \[\label{original_lag} \begin{split} L(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{b}, \lambda) ~:=~ & \textstyle \sum_{(i,k) \in \mathcal{E}}[r_{ik}-\beta^{\max}_i(b_{ik})]s_ix_{ik}\rho_i(b_{ik}) \\ + & \textstyle \sum_{k \in \mathcal{K}} \lambda_k \left[ m_k ~-~ \sum_{i \in \mathcal{I}_k}r_{ik}s_ix_{ik}\rho_i(b_{ik}) \right] \. \end{split}\] After rearranging, we may re-express the Lagrangian function: \[\label{rearrange} \begin{split} L(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{b}, \lambda) = & \textstyle \sum_{(i,k) \in \mathcal{E} }[(1-\lambda_k)r_{ik}-\beta^{\max}_i(b_{ik})]s_ix_{ik}\rho_i(b_{ik})\\ & \textstyle + ~\sum_{k \in \mathcal{K}} \lambda_k m_k \end{split}\] Note that the above implies a natural interpretation of the dual variables as related to scaling factors, namely \(1-\lambda_k\) for each \(k \in \mathcal{K}\), to reduce the bid prices based on the fact that each campaign has limited budget. The dual function is defined in the standard way: \[\label{dual_fcn_def} L^\ast(\lambda) := \max_{\mathbf{x} \in \mathcal{S}, \mathbf{b} \geq 0} \ L(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{b}, \lambda) \,\] and we define the dual problem as: \[\label{dual_prob} \begin{array}{lcl} \underset{\lambda}{\mathrm{minimize}} & & \displaystyle L^\ast(\lambda) \\ \mathrm{subject \ to} & & 0 \leq \lambda_k \leq 1 \ \ \text{for all } k \in \mathcal{K} \. \end{array}\] Note that the nonnegativity constraints above are standard in Lagrangian duality to ensure that [\[dual_prob\]](#dual_prob){reference-type="eqref" reference="dual_prob"} provides a valid upper bound on [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"}. The upper bound constraints, i.e., \(\lambda_k \leq 1\) for all \(k \in \mathcal{K}\), are without loss of generality since whenever \(\lambda_k > 1\) the dual function \(L^\ast(\lambda)\) is only improved by instead setting \(\lambda_k = 1\). It is always the case that \(L^\ast(\cdot)\) is a convex function, but in general it may not be differentiable. Nevertheless, Procedure [\[algo-subgrad\]](#algo-subgrad){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-subgrad"} precisely describes how to compute a *subgradient* of \(L^\ast(\cdot)\) at \(\lambda\) and is based on Proposition [\[prop:truth\]](#prop:truth){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:truth"}. Theorem [\[prop_dual_fcn\]](#prop_dual_fcn){reference-type="ref" reference="prop_dual_fcn"} demonstrates that Procedure [\[algo-subgrad\]](#algo-subgrad){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-subgrad"} computes valid subgradients and also summarizes the most important properties of the dual function \(L^\ast(\cdot)\) and the dual problem [\[dual_prob\]](#dual_prob){reference-type="eqref" reference="dual_prob"}.
Algorithm [\[algo-twophase\]](#algo-twophase){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-twophase"} presents our two phase procedure for obtaining an approximate solution \((\hat\mathbf{x}, \hat\mathbf{b})\) of problem [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"}. In Phase 1, we solve the dual problem [\[dual_prob\]](#dual_prob){reference-type="eqref" reference="dual_prob"}. As mentioned previously, we suggest the use of simple subgradient methods (see, for example, and the references therein), with the use of Procedure [\[algo-subgrad\]](#algo-subgrad){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-subgrad"} to compute subgradients, in order to solve this problem. In our experiments in Section [5](#sec:expts){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:expts"}, we use the basic method of projected subgradient descent with step-sizes proportional to \(1/\sqrt{T}\) where \(T\) is the iteration counter. In this case, as evident from Procedure [\[algo-subgrad\]](#algo-subgrad){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-subgrad"}, the subgradients will remain bounded and therefore we may apply classical convergence results for this method, which state that the objective function value optimality gap converges to zero at the rate of \(O(1/\sqrt{T})\). Moreover, the per iteration cost of this method is dominated by the cost of computing a subgradient, which, as is clear from Procedure [\[algo-subgrad\]](#algo-subgrad){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-subgrad"} and Remark [\[calScompute\]](#calScompute){reference-type="ref" reference="calScompute"}, is \(O(|\mathcal{E}|)\).
:::
We also refer to Policy [\[algo-online\]](#algo-online){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-online"} as the "Lagrangian policy." Notice that Policy [\[algo-online\]](#algo-online){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-online"} is particularly conservative in dealing with what happens when a campaign depletes its budget. Indeed, if a campaign with depleted budget is sampled then the DSP does not participate in the auction. Policy [\[algo-online\]](#algo-online){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-online"} may be improved by incorporating the idea of model predictive control whereby Algorithm [\[algo-twophase\]](#algo-twophase){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-twophase"} is rerun every time a campaign depletes its budget, or possibly at periodic time intervals. We compare Algorithm [\[algo-twophase\]](#algo-twophase){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-twophase"} and correspondingly Policy [\[algo-online\]](#algo-online){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-online"} against a simple "greedy policy" that is often employed in practice. Indeed, the greedy policy has the same basic flow of events as Policy [\[algo-online\]](#algo-online){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-online"} with two major differences in how decisions are made: *(i)* at Step (1.) the greedy policy selects, among those campaigns in \(\mathcal{K}_i\) with budgets that are not yet depleted, the campaign \(\tilde k\) with the largest eCPI value of \(r_{ik}\), and *(ii)* at Step (2.) the greedy policy uses \(r_{i\tilde{k}}\), the eCPI value of the selected campaign, as the bid price.
#### Synthetic Data Examples
Let us now describe how the synthetic data examples were generated and how the corresponding simulations were conducted. Throughout this discussion, all relevant random variables are generated independently unless otherwise mentioned. Furthermore, throughout our experiments, it is assumed that the optimization model developed herein is *correctly specified* in that all distributional information used by our model (e.g., in [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} and Algorithm [\[algo-twophase\]](#algo-twophase){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-twophase"}) accurately reflect the corresponding random variables in our simulations. Now, to generate our synthetic instances, we first fix the sizes of the sets \(\mathcal{K}\) and \(\mathcal{I}\), and for each campaign \(k \in \mathcal{K}\) (and also for each impression type \(i \in \mathcal{I}\)) we generate a "quality score" \(Q_k\) (resp., \(Q_i\)) that is uniformly distributed on \([0,1]\). The quality scores are intended to reflect the "desirability" of each impression type and each campaign and are used to generate the main parameters of our model. Indeed, for each impression type \(i \in \mathcal{I}\), the set \(\mathcal{K}_i\) is constructed by sampling edges independently with probability \(Q_i\). Hence \(|\mathcal{K}_i| \sim \text{Bin}(|\mathcal{K}|, Q_i)\), where \(\text{Bin}(n, p)\) denotes a binomial random variable with \(n\) trials and success probability parameter \(p\). Moreover, for each impression type \(i \in \mathcal{I}\), \(B^{\max}_i\) is taken to be the maximum of \(\text{Bin}(M, Q_i)\) independent random variables that are uniformly distributed on \([0,1]\), where \(M\) is an integer parameter dictating the "size of the market." The click-through-rate values \(\theta_{ik}\) are defined by \(\theta_{ik} := Q_i \cdot Q_k\). In all of our experiments, we set \(|\mathcal{K}| = 100\), \(M = 10\), \(s_i = 5000\) for all \(i \in \mathcal{I}\), and the CPC value \(q_k = 1\) for all \(k \in \mathcal{K}\). In our first experiment, we generated a single problem instance, referred to as Example A, that additionally had \(|\mathcal{I}| = 100\) and the budget parameters set to \(m_k = 50\) for all \(k \in \mathcal{K}\). In this case, as verified by the dual upper bound \(\hat D\), Algorithm [\[algo-twophase\]](#algo-twophase){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-twophase"} was able to solve problem [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} to within 13% of optimality. We compared the Policy [\[algo-online\]](#algo-online){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-online"} implied by Algorithm [\[algo-twophase\]](#algo-twophase){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-twophase"} to the "greedy policy" described earlier by simulating the impression arrival, real-time bidding, and click processes. In our simulations, we assume that impressions arrive to the ad exchange according to \(|\mathcal{I}|\) independent Poisson processes that are "merged" together. This assumption implies that \(S_i\) is a Poisson random variable, and the time horizon \(T\) of the overall arrival process is set so that \(s_i = 5000\) for each \(i \in \mathcal{I}\).
#### Results
The top left table in Figure [\[thefig\]](#thefig){reference-type="ref" reference="thefig"} presents the main results of our first experiment on Example A. We ran 500 simulation runs comparing our Lagrangian relaxation approach, i.e., Policy [\[algo-online\]](#algo-online){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-online"} to the greedy baseline policy. Each policy saw the same exact sequence of impression arrivals and the same sequence of realized \(B^{\max}_i\) values during each individual simulation run. For each simulation run, we computed the relative profit, relative cost, and relative revenue of the two policies, where each relative statistic is computed as the Lagrangian statistic relative to the greedy baseline, e.g., \(\text{Relative Profit} := \frac{\text{Lagrangian Profit}}{\text{Greedy Profit}}\). The results in the tables are averaged over 500 such simulation runs. As the top left table demonstrates, the Lagrangian policy is able to achieve significantly higher profit levels and lower costs than the greedy baseline. Interestingly, the Lagrangian policy also achieves lower revenue levels than the greedy policy. This makes good intuitive sense since the Lagrangian policy uses bid prices that are shaded down by a factor of \(1-\lambda_k\) as compared to the greedy policy, and moreover the Lagrangian policy should make smarter allocation decisions whereby, under the Lagrangian policy, a particularly valuable campaign would wait for better opportunities before depleting its budget as compared to the greedy policy. The bottom left table in Figure [\[thefig\]](#thefig){reference-type="ref" reference="thefig"} reports the budget utilization (defined as total revenue divided by \(\sum_{k \in \mathcal{K}}m_k\)) and profit margin (defined as total profit divided by total revenue) statistics for each policy, which confirms our intuition and the results presented in top left table. Example B constitutes our second experiment, whereby we took the same exact problem instance and made one modification, namely instead of using constant budgets across the different campaigns we allowed the budget to be correlated with the quality score of each campaign so that \(m_k := 50Q_k\). As Figure [\[thefig\]](#thefig){reference-type="ref" reference="thefig"} demonstrates, the profit improvement of the Lagrangian policy over the greedy baseline is even more dramatic in this case. In our third experiment, we generated a fresh problem instance using all of the same parameters as before except for two differences: *(i)* we set \(|\mathcal{I}| = 10\), and *(ii)* we varied the budget parameters \(m_k \in \{5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50\}\) (also we took \(m_k\) to be constant across the different campaigns) and reran Algorithm [\[algo-twophase\]](#algo-twophase){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-twophase"} for each of the 10 budget values. The right side of Figure [\[thefig\]](#thefig){reference-type="ref" reference="thefig"} plots the relative profit of the two policies versus these budget values, and for each of the 10 budget values the relative profit statistic was averaged over 500 simulation runs. Clearly, the Lagrangian policy has significantly larger profits over the greedy policy for small budget values, but as the budget increases this improvement is diminished. This makes sense since the Lagrangian policy is based on accounting for the budget constraints in [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} via dual variables. Indeed, as the budget values become larger, the budget constraints are less active and Proposition [\[prop:truth\]](#prop:truth){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:truth"} implies that Policy [\[algo-online\]](#algo-online){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-online"} and the greedy policy are exactly the same when \(m_k\) is large enough for each \(k \in \mathcal{K}\). Let us conclude this section by mentioning a few directions for future research. First, it would be very valuable to also perform some computational experiments comparing the Lagrangian policy to the greedy policy using a real advertising dataset. Second, it would be very interesting to extend our methodology, in particular problem [\[poi_deterministic\]](#poi_deterministic){reference-type="eqref" reference="poi_deterministic"} and Algorithm [\[algo-twophase\]](#algo-twophase){reference-type="ref" reference="algo-twophase"} to different pricing models, such as the CPM pricing model, with performance constraints. Finally, it would be interesting to examine the benefits of more sophisticated stochastic or robust optimization approaches that more carefully account for the uncertainty in the impression arrivals and the real-time bidding environment. The authors plan to pursue all of these directions in future research. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:03:27', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01614', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01614'} |
null | null |
# Introduction {#intro}
Advances in a wide range of medical imaging technologies have revolutionized how we view functional and pathological events in the body and define anatomical structures in which these events take place. X-ray, CAT, MRI, Ultrasound, nuclear medicine, among other medical imaging technologies, enable 2D or tomographic 3D images to capture in-vivo structural and functional information inside the body for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning and other purposes. One fundamental problem in medical image analysis is image segmentation, which identifies the boundaries of objects such as organs or abnormal regions (e.g. tumors) in images. Since manually annotation can be very time-consuming and subjective, an accurate and reliable automatic segmentation method is valuable for both clinical and research purpose. Having the segmentation result makes it possible for shape analysis, detecting volume change, and making a precise radiation therapy treatment plan. In the literature of image processing and computer vision, various theoretical frameworks have been proposed for automatic segmentation. Traditional unsupervised methods such as thresholding , region growing , edge detection and grouping , Markov Random Fields (MRFs) , active contour models , Mumford-Shah functional based frame partition , level sets , graph cut , mean shift , and their extensions and integrations usually utilize constraints about image intensity or object appearance. Supervised methods , on the other hand, directly learn from labeled training samples, extract features and context information in order to perform a dense pixel (or voxel)-wise classification. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been widely applied to visual recognition problems in recent years, and they are shown effective in learning a hierarchy of features at multiple scales from data. For pixel-wise semantic segmentation, CNNs have also achieved remarkable success. In , Long *et al.* first proposed a fully convolutional networks (FCNs) for semantic segmentation. The authors replaced conventional fully connected layers in CNNs with convolutional layers to obtain a coarse label map, and then upsampled the label map with deconvolutional layers to get per pixel classification results. Noh *et al.* used an encoder-decoder structure to get more fine details about segmented objects. With multiple unpooling and deconvolutional layers in their architecture, they avoided the coarse-to-fine stage in . However, they still needed to ensemble with FCNs in their method to capture local dependencies between labels. Lin *et al.* combined Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) and CNNs to better explore spatial correlations between pixels, but they also needed to implement a dense CRF to refine their CNN output. In the field of medical image segmentation, deep CNNs have also been applied with promising results. Ronneberger *et al.* presented a FCN, namely U-net, for segmenting neuronal structures in electron microscopic stacks. With the idea of skip-connection from , the U-net achieved very good performance and has since been applied to many different tasks such as image translation . In addition, Havaei *et al.* obtained good performance for medical image segmentation with their InputCascadeCNN. The InputCascadeCNN has image patches as inputs and uses a cascade of CNNs in which the output probabilities of a first-stage CNN are taken as additional inputs to a second-stage CNN. Pereira *et al.* applied deep CNNs with small kernels for brain tumor segmentation. They proposed different architectures for segmenting high grade and low grade tumors, respectively. Kamnitsas *et al.* proposed a 3D CNN using two pathways with inputs of different resolutions. 3D CRFs were also needed to refine their results. Although these previous approaches using CNNs for segmentation have achieved promising results, they still have limitations. All above methods utilize a pixel-wise loss, such as softmax, in the last layer of their networks, which is insufficient to learn both local and global contextual relations between pixels. Hence they always need models such as CRFs as a refinement to enforce spatial contiguity in the output label maps. Many previous methods address this issue by training CNNs on image patches and using multi-scale, multi-path CNNs with different input resolutions or different CNN architectures. Using patches and multi-scale inputs could capture spatial context information to some extent. Nevertheless, as described in U-net , the computational cost for patch training is very high and there is a trade-off between localization accuracy and the patch size. Instead of training on small image patches, current state-of-the-art CNN architectures such as U-net are trained on whole images or large image patches and use skip connections to combine hierarchical features for generating the label map. They have shown potential to implicitly learn some local dependencies between pixels. However, these methods are still limited by their pixel-wise loss function, which lacks the ability to enforce the learning of multi-scale spatial constraints directly in the end-to-end training process. Compared with patch training, an issue for CNNs trained on entire images is label or class imbalance. While patch training methods can sample a balanced number of patches from each class, the numbers of pixels belonging to different classes in full-image training methods are usually imbalanced. To mitigate this problem, U-net uses a weighted cross-entropy loss to balance the class frequencies. However, the choice of weights in their loss function is task-specific and is hard to optimize. In contract to the weighted loss in U-net, a general loss that could avoid class imbalance as well as extra hyper-parameters would be more desirable. In this paper, we propose a novel end-to-end Adversarial Network architecture, called SegAN, with a multi-scale \(L_1\) loss function, for semantic segmentation. Inspired by the original GAN , the training procedure for SegAN is similar to a two-player min-max game in which a segmentor network (\(S\)) and a critic network (\(C\)) are trained in an alternating fashion to respectively minimize and maximize an objective function. However, there are several major differences between our SegAN and the original GAN that make SegAN significantly better for the task of image segmentation.
- In contrast to classic GAN with separate losses for generator and discriminator, we propose a novel multi-scale loss function for both segmentor and critic. Our critic is trained to maximize a novel multi-scale \(L_{1}\) objective function that takes into account CNN feature differences between the predicted segmentation and the ground truth segmentation at multiple scales (i.e. at multiple layers).
- We use a fully convolutional neural network (FCN) as the segmentor \(S\), which is trained with only gradients flowing through the critic, and with the objective of minimizing the same loss function as for the critic.
- Our SegAN is an end-to-end architecture trained on whole images, with no requirements for patches, or inputs of multiple resolutions, or further smoothing of the predicted label maps using CRFs.
By training the entire system end-to-end with back propagation and alternating the optimization of \(S\) and \(C\), SegAN can directly learn spatial pixel dependencies at multiple scales. Compared with previous methods that learn hierarchical features with multi-scale multi-path CNNs , our SegAN network applies a novel multi-scale loss to enforce the learning of hierarchical features in a more straightforward and efficient manner. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed SegAN achieves comparable or better results than the state-of-the-art CNN-based architectures including U-net. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section [2](#methods){reference-type="ref" reference="methods"} introduces our SegAN architecture and methodology. Experimental results are presented in Section 3. Finally, we conclude this paper in Section 4.
# Methodology {#methods}
As illustrated in Figure [\[fig:architecture\]](#fig:architecture){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:architecture"}, the proposed SegAN consists of two parts: the segmentor network \(S\) and the critic network \(C\). The segmentor is a fully convolutional encoder-decoder network that generates a probability label map from input images. The critic network is fed with two inputs: original images masked by ground truth label maps, and original images masked by predicted label maps from \(S\). The \(S\) and \(C\) networks are alternately trained in an adversarial fashion: the training of \(S\) aims to minimize our proposed multi-scale \(L_1\) loss, while the training of \(C\) aims to maximize the same loss function.
## The multi-scale \(L_1\) loss
The conventional GANs have an objective loss function defined as: \[\begin{split} \min_{\theta_G} &\max_{\theta_D} \mathcal{L}(\theta_G,\theta_D)\\ &= \mathbb{E}_{x\sim P_\mathrm{data}}[\log D(x)] + \mathbb{E}_{z\sim P_z}\log (1-D(G(z)))] \enspace. \end{split}\] In this objective function, \(x\) is the real image from an unknown distribution \(P_\mathrm{data}\), and \(z\) is a random input for the generator, drawn from a probability distribution (such as Gaussion) \(P_z\). \(\theta_G\) and \(\theta_D\) represent the parameters for the generator and discriminator in GAN, respectively. In our proposed SegAN, given a dataset with \(N\) training images \(x_n\) and corresponding ground truth label maps \(y_n\), the multi-scale objective loss function \(\mathcal{L}\) is defined as: \[\begin{split} \min\limits_{\theta_S} &\max\limits_{\theta_C}\mathcal{L}(\theta_S,\theta_C) \\ &= \frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=1}^N \ell_\mathrm{mae}(f_C(x_n \circ S(x_n)), f_C(x_n \circ y_n)) \enspace, \label{eq:SegGANloss} \end{split}\] where \(\ell_\mathrm{mae}\) is the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) or \(L_1\) distance; \(x_n \circ S(x_n)\) is the input image masked by segmentor-predicted label map (i.e., pixel-wise multiplication of predicted_label_map and original_image); \(x_n \circ y_n\) is the input image masked by its ground truth label map (i.e., pixel-wise multiplication of ground_truth_label_map and original_image); and \(f_C(x)\) represents the hierarchical features extracted from image \(x\) by the critic network. More specifically, the \(\ell_\mathrm{mae}\) function is defined as: \[\ell_\mathrm{mae}(f_C({x}), f_C({x}^{\prime})) = \frac{1}{L}\sum_{i=1}^L ||f_C^i({x})-f_C^i({x}^{\prime})||_{1} \enspace ,\label{eq:mae}\] where \(L\) is the total number of layers (i.e. scales) in the critic network, and \(f_C^i({x})\) is the extracted feature map of image \({x}\) at the \(i\)th layer of \(C\).
## SegAN Architecture
**Segmentor.** We use a fully convolutional encoder-decoder structure for the segmentor \(S\) network. We use the convolutional layer with kernel size \(4 \times 4\) and stride \(2\) for downsampling, and perform upsampling by image resize layer with a factor of \(2\) and convolutional layer with kernel size \(3 \times 3\) stride \(1\). We also follow the U-net and add skip connections between corresponding layers in the encoder and the decoder. **Critic.** The critic \(C\) has the similar structure as the decoder in \(S\). Hierarchical features are extracted from multiple layers of \(C\) and used to compute the multi-scale \(L_1\) loss. This loss can capture long-and short-range spatial relations between pixels by using these hierarchical features, i.e., pixel-level features, low-level (e.g. superpixels) features, and middle-level (e.g. patches) features. More details including activation layers (e.g., leaky ReLU), batch normalization layer and the number of feature maps used in each convolutional layers can be found in Figure [\[fig:architecture\]](#fig:architecture){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:architecture"}.
## Training SegAN
The segmentor \(S\) and critic \(C\) in SegAN are trained by back-propagation from the proposed multi-scale \(L_1\) loss. In an alternating fashion, we first fix \(S\) and train \(C\) for one step using gradients computed from the loss function, and then fix \(C\) and train \(S\) for one step using gradients computed from the same loss function passed to \(S\) from \(C\). As shown in ([\[eq:SegGANloss\]](#eq:SegGANloss){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SegGANloss"}), the training of \(S\) and \(C\) is like playing a min-max game: while \(G\) aims to minimize the multi-scale feature loss, \(C\) tries to maximize it. As training progresses, both the \(S\) and \(C\) networks become more and more powerful. And eventually, the segmentor will be able to produce predicted label maps that are very close to the ground truth as labeled by human experts. We also find that the \(S\)-predicted label maps are smoother and contain less noise than manually-obtained ground truth label maps. We trained all networks using RMSProp solver with batch size \(64\) and learning rate \(0.00002\). We used a grid search method to select the best values for the number of up-sampling blocks and the number of down-sampling blocks for the segmentor (four, in both cases), and for the number of down-sampling blocks for the critic (three).
## Proof of training stability and convergence
Having introduced the multi-scale \(L_1\) loss, we next prove that our training is stable and finally reaches an equilibrium. First, we introduce some notations. Let \(f:\mathcal{X} \rightarrow \mathcal{X}^{\prime}\) be the mapping between an input medical image and its corresponding ground truth segmentation, where \(\mathcal{X}\) represents the compact space of medical images[^1] and \(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\) represents the compact space of ground truth segmentations. We approximate this ground truth mapping \(f\) with a segmentor neural network \(g_\theta: \mathcal{X} \rightarrow \mathcal{X}^{\prime}\) parameterized by vector \(\theta\) which takes an input image, and generates a segmentation result. Assume the best approximation to the ground truth mapping by a neural network is the network \(g_{\hat{\theta}}\) with optimal parameter vector \(\hat{\theta}\). Second, we introduce a lemma about the Lipschitz continuity of either the segmentor or the critic neural network in our framework.
Now we prove Lemma [\[lem1\]](#lem1){reference-type="ref" reference="lem1"}.
Based on Lemma [\[lem1\]](#lem1){reference-type="ref" reference="lem1"}, we then prove that our multi-scale loss is bounded and won't become arbitrarily large during the training, and it will finally converge.
# Experiments
In this section, we evaluated our system on the fully-annotated MICCAI BRATS datasets . Specifically, we trained and validated our models using the BRATS 2015 training dataset, which consists of \(220\) high grade subjects and \(54\) low grade subjects with four modalities: T1, T1c, T2 and Flair. We randomly split the BRATS 2015 training data with the ratio \(9: 1\) into a training set and a validation set. We did such split for the high grade and low grade subjects separately, and then re-combined the resulting sets for training and validation. Each subject in BRATS 2015 dataset is a 3D brain MRI volume with size \(240 \times 240 \times 155\). We center cropped each subject into a subvolume of \(180 \times 180 \times 128\), to remove the border black regions while still keep the entire brain regions. We did our final evaluation and comparison on the BRATS 2015 test set using the BRATS online evaluation system, which has *Dice*, *Precision* and *Sensitivity* as the evaluation metrics. The Dice score is is identical to the F-score which normalizes the number of true positives to the average size of the two segmented regions: \[\mathrm{Dice} = \frac{2|P \cap T|}{|P|+|T|}\] where \(P\) and \(T\) represent the predicted region and the ground truth region, respectively. Since the BRATS 2013 dataset is a subset of BRATS 2015, we also present our results on BRATS 2013 leaderboard set. Although some work with 3D patching CNNs have been done for medical image segmentation, due to the limitation of our hardware memory and for the reason that brain images in BRATS dataset are inconsistent in third dimension, we built a 2D SegAN network to generate the label map for each axial slice of a 3D volume and then restack these 2D label maps to produce the 3D label map for brain tumor. Since each subject was center cropped to be a \(180 \times 180 \times 128\) volume, it yields 128 axial slices each with the size \(180 \times 180\). These axial slices were further randomly cropped to size \(160 \times 160\) during training for the purpose of data augmentation. They were centered cropped to size \(160 \times 160\) during validation and testing. We used three modalities of these MRI images: T1c, T2, FLAIR. Corresponding slices of T1c, T2, FLAIR modalities are concatenated along the channel dimension and used as the multi-channel input to our SegAN model, as shown in Figure [\[fig:architecture\]](#fig:architecture){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:architecture"}. The segmentor of SegAN outputs label maps with the same dimensions as the input images. As required by the BRATS challenge , we did experiments with the objective to generate label maps for three types of tumor regions: *whole tumor*, *tumor core* and *Gd-enhanced tumor core*.
## Choice of components in SegAN architecture
In this section, we compare different implementations of the proposed SegAN architecture and also evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed multi-scale \(L_1\) loss on the BRATS validation set for the brain tumor segmentation task. Specifically, we compare the following implementations:
- **S1-1C.** A separate SegAN is built for every label class, i.e. one segmentor (S1) and one critic (1C) per label.
- **S3-1C:** A SegAN is built with one segmentor and one critic, but the segmentor generates a three-channel label map, one channel for each label. Therefore, each 3-channel label map produces three masked images (one for each class), which are then concatenated in the channel dimension and fed into the critic.
- **S3-3C.** A SegAN is built with one segmentor that generates a three-channel (i.e. three-class) label map, but three separate critics, one for each label class. The networks, one \(S\) and three \(C\)s, are then trained end-to-end using the average loss computed from all three \(C\)s.
- **S3-3C single-scale loss models.** For comparison, we also built two single-scale loss models: S3-3C-s0 and S3-3C-s3. S3-3C-s0 computes the loss using features from only the input layers (i.e., layer \(0\)) of the critics, and S3-3C-s3 calculates the loss using features from only the output layers (i.e., layer \(3\)) of the critics.
As shown in Figure [\[fig:component\]](#fig:component){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:component"}, models S1-1C and S3-3C give similar performance which is the best among all models. Since the computational cost for S1-1C is higher than S3-3C, S3-3C is more favorable and we use it to compare our SegAN model with other methods in Section [\[sec:comparison\]](#sec:comparison){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:comparison"}. In contrast, while model S3-1C is the simplest requiring the least computational cost, it sacrifices some performance; but by using the multi-scale loss, it still performs better than any of the two single-scale loss models especially for segmenting tumor core and Gd-enhanced tumor core regions.
## Comparison to state-of-the-art
In this subsection, we compare the proposed method, our S3-3C SegAN model, with other state-of-the-art methods on the BRATS 2013 Leaderboard Test and the BRATS 2015 Test . We also implemented a U-net model for comparison. This U-net model has the exact same architecture as our SegAN segmentor except that the multi-scale SegAN loss is replaced with the softmax loss in the U-net. Table [\[tb:result\]](#tb:result){reference-type="ref" reference="tb:result"} gives all comparison results. From the table, one can see that our SegAN compares favorably to the existing state-of-the-art on BRATS 2013 while achieves better performance on BRATS 2015. Moreover, the dice scores of our SegAN outperform the U-net baseline for segmenting all three types of tumor regions. Another observation is that our SegAN-produced label maps are smooth with little noise. Figure [\[fig:examples\]](#fig:examples){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:examples"} illustrates some example results of our SegAN; in the figure, the segmented regions of the three classes (whole tumor, tumor core, and Gd-enhanced tumor core) are shown in yellow, blue, and red, respectively. One possible reason behind this phenomenon is that the proposed multi-scale \(L_1\) loss from our adversarial critic network encourages the segmentor to learn both global and local features that capture long-and short-range spatial relations between pixels, resulting fewer noises and smoother results.
# Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, our proposed SegAN is the first GAN-inspired framework adapted specifically for the segmentation task that produces superior segmentation accuracy. While conventional GANs have been successfully applied to many unsupervised learning tasks (e.g., image synthesis ) and semi-supervised classification , there are very few works that apply adversarial learning to semantic segmentation. One such work that we found by Luc *et al.* used both the conventional adversarial loss of GAN and pixel-wise softmax loss against ground truth. They showed small but consistent gains on both the Stanford Background dataset and the PASCAL VOC 2012 dataset; the authors observed that pre-training only the adversarial network was unstable and suggested an alternating scheme for updating the segmenting network's and the adversarial network's weights. We believe that the main reason contributing to the unstable training of their framework is: the conventional adversarial loss is based on a single scalar output by the discriminator that classifies a whole input image into real or fake category. When inputs to the discriminator are generated *vs.* ground truth dense pixel-wise label maps as in the segmentation task, the real/fake classification task is too easy for the discriminator and a trivial solution is found quickly. As a result, no sufficient gradients can flow through the discriminator to improve the training of generator. In comparison, our SegAN uses a multi-scale feature loss that measures the difference between generated segmentation and ground truth segmentation at multiple layers in the critic, forcing both the segmentor and critic to learn hierarchical features that capture long-and short-range spatial relationships between pixels. Using the same loss function for both \(S\) and \(C\), the training of SegAN is end-to-end and stable.
# Conclusions
In this paper, we propose a novel end-to-end Adversarial Network architecture, namely SegAN, with a new multi-scale loss for semantic segmentation. Experimental evaluation on the BRATS brain tumor segmentation dataset shows that the proposed multi-scale loss in an adversarial training framework is very effective and leads to more superior performance when compared with single-scale loss or the conventional pixel-wise softmax loss. As a general framework, our SegAN is not limited to medical image segmentation applications. In our future work, we plan to investigate the potential of SegAN for general semantic segmentation tasks. | {'timestamp': '2017-07-18T02:05:30', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01805', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01805'} |
null | null |
# Introduction
The study of deep-inelastic scattering (DIS) of leptons off nuclei reveals an appearance of a significant nuclear effect (for a review see, e.g., ). It was first observed by the European Muon Collaboration in the valence quark dominance region; hence the name. This observation rules out the naive picture of a nucleus as being a system of quasi-free nucleons. There in general are two mainstream approaches to studying the EMC effect. In the first one, which is at present more popular, nuclear parton distribution functions (nPDFs) are extracted from the global fits to nuclear data by using empirical parametrizations of their normalizations (see ). This is completely analogous to respective studies of usual (nucleon) PDFs (see recent analyses in ). Both PDFs and nPDFs are obtained from the numerical solution to Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) equations [^1]. The second strategy is based upon some models of nuclear PDFs (see different models in, for example, --and a recent review ). Here we will follow the rescaling model , which was very popular some time ago. The model is based on a suggestion that the effective confinement size of gluons and quarks in the nucleus is greater than in a free nucleon. In the framework of perturbative QCD it was found that such a change in the confinement scale predicts that nPDFs and PDFs can be related by simply rescaling their arguments (see Eq. ([\[va.1a\]](#va.1a){reference-type="ref" reference="va.1a"}) below). Thus, in a sense, the rescaling model lies in-between two above approaches: in its framework there are certain relations between usual and nuclear PDFs that result from shifting the values of kinematical variable \(\mu^2\); however, both densities obey DGLAP equations. At that time, the model was established for the valence quark dominance region \(0.2 \leq x \leq 0.8\). The aim of our paper is to extend its applicability to the region of small \(x\) values, where the rescaling values can be different for gluons and quarks. To see it clearly we use the generalized double-scaling approach (DAS) . The latter is based upon the analytical solution to DGLAP equations in the small \(x\) region and generalizes earlier studies . A few years ago most analyses of nPDFs have been done in the leading order (LO) of perturbation theory, but now the situation is drastically changed and the standard level of accuracy in current analyses is at the next-to-leading order (NLO) one (see ). Even more, there have already appeared a global analysis performed at the next-to-next-to-leading order. Nevertheless the present analysis will be carried out in LO. We note that the analysis to this level of accuracy is just for the start and can be considered as a first step in our investigations in this direction. We are going to improve the accuracy at least to the NLO level in the future works.
# SF \(F_2\) at low \(x\)
A reasonable agreement between HERA data and predictions made by perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) was observed for \(Q^2 \geq 2\) GeV\(^2\) , thereby promising that perturbative QCD is capable of describing the evolution of parton densities down to very low \(Q^2\) values. Some time ago ZEUS and H1 Collaborations have presented new precise combined data on the structure function (SF) \(F_2\). An application of the generalized DAS approach at NLO shows that theoretical predictions are well compatible with experimental data at \(Q^2 \geq 3\div 4\) GeV\(^2\) (see recent results in ). In the present paper we perform a LO analysis of the combined data where the SF \(F_2\) has the following form \[\begin{aligned}
F_2(x,\mu^2) &=& e \, f_q(x,\mu^2), \label{8a} \end{aligned}\] where \(e=(\sum_1^f e_i^2)/f\) is an average of the squared quark charges. Notice that the approach used in these analyses will be analogous to that exploited in NLO ones carried out in --. The small-\(x\) asymptotic expressions for parton densities \(f_a\) can be written as follows \[\begin{aligned}
f_a(x,\mu^2) &=& f_a^{+}(x,\mu^2) + f_a^{-}(x,\mu^2),~~(\mbox{hereafter}~~~a=q,g) \nonumber \\ f^{+}_g(x,\mu^2) &=& \biggl(A_g + \frac{4}{9} A_q \biggl) \tilde{I}_0(\sigma) \; e^{-\overline d_{+} s} + O(\rho), \nonumber \\ f^{+}_q(x,\mu^2) &=& \frac{f}{9} \biggl(A_g + \frac{4}{9} A_q \biggl) \rho \tilde{I}_1(\sigma) \; e^{-\overline d_{+} s} + O(\rho), \label{8.01} \\ f^{-}_g(x,\mu^2) &=&-\frac{4}{9} A_q e^{-d_{-} s} \, + \, O(x),~~ f^{-}_q(x,\mu^2) ~=~ A_q e^{-d_{-}(1) s} \, + \, O(x), \label{8.02} \end{aligned}\] where \(I_{\nu}\) (\(\nu=0,1\)) are the modified Bessel functions with \[\begin{aligned}
&&s=\ln \left( \frac{a_s(\mu^2_0)}{a_s(\mu^2)} \right),~~ \sigma = 2\sqrt{\left|\hat{d}_+\right| s \ln \left( \frac{1}{x} \right)} \ ,~~~ \rho=\frac{\sigma}{2\ln(1/x)},~~ \nonumber \\ &&a_s(\mu^2) \equiv \frac{\alpha_s(\mu^2)}{4\pi} = \frac{1}{\beta_0\ln(\mu^2/\Lambda^2_{\rm LO})} \label{intro:1a} \end{aligned}\] and \[\hat{d}_+ =-\frac{12}{\beta_0},~~~ \overline d_{+} = 1 + \frac{20f}{27\beta_0},~~~ d_{-} = \frac{16f}{27\beta_0} \label{intro:1b}\] denote singular \(\hat{d}_+\) and regular \(\overline d_{+}\) parts of the "anomalous dimensions" \(d_{+}(n)\) and \(d_{-}(n)\) [^2], respectively, in the limit \(n\to1\). By using the expressions given above we have analyzed H1 and ZEUS data for \(F_2\). In order to keep the analysis as simple as possible, here we take \(\mu^2=Q^2\) and \(\alpha_s(M^2_Z)=0.1168\) in agreement with ZEUS results presented in . Moreover, we use the fixed flavor scheme with two different values \(f=3\) and \(f=4\) of active quarks. As can be seen from Table 1, the twist-two approximation looks reasonable for \(Q^2 \geq 3.5\) GeV\(^2\). It is almost completely compatible with NLO analyses done in --. Moreover, these results are rather close to original analyses (see and references therein) performed by the HERAPDF group. As in the case of our \(\chi^2/DOF \sim 1\) unless combined H1 and ZEUS experimental data analyzed are kept according to \(Q^2 \geq 3.5\) GeV\(^2\). At lower \(Q^2\) there is certain disagreement, which is we believe to be explained by the higher-twist (HT) corrections playing their important role. These HT corrections have rather cumbersome form at low \(x\) . As it was shown , it is very promising to use infrared modifications of the strong coupling constant in our analysis. Such types of coupling constants modify the low \(\mu^2\) behavior of parton densities and structure functions. What is important, they do not generate additional free parameters. Moreover, the present results will be applied in the analyses of NMC data (see Sect. 5 and 6) accumulated at very low \(Q^2\) values, where the HT expansion (\(\sim 1/Q^{2n}\)) is thought to be not applicable. So, following , we are going to use the so-called "frozen" \(a_{\rm fr}(\mu^2)\) and analytic \(a_{\rm an}(\mu^2)\) versions \[a_{\rm fr}(\mu^2) = a_s(\mu^2 + M^2_{g}),~~~ a_{\rm an}(\mu^2) = a_s(\mu^2)-\frac{1}{\beta_0} \, \frac{\Lambda_{\rm LO}^2}{\mu^2-\Lambda_{\rm LO}^2} \,, \label{Ana}\] where \(M_{g}\) is a gluon mass with \(M_{g}\)=1 GeV\(^2\) (see and references therein [^3]). It is seen that the results of the fits carried out when \(a_{\rm fr}(\mu^2)\) and \(a_{\rm an}(\mu^2)\) are used, are very similar to the corresponding ones obtained in . Moreover, note that the fits in the cases with "frozen" and analytic strong coupling constants look very much alike (see also ) and describe fairly well the data in the low \(Q^2\) region, as opposed to the fits with a standard coupling constant, which largely fails here. The results are presented in Table 1. With the number of active quarks \(f=4\), they are shown also in Fig. 1. Just like the previous analyses we observe strong improvement in the agreement between theoretical predictions and experimental data once "frozen" and analytic modifiations to the coupling constant are applied. When the data are cut by \(Q^2 \geq\) 1 GeV\(^2\), \(\chi^2\) value drops by more than two times. Ditto for the analyses of data with \(Q^2 \geq\) 3.5 GeV\(^2\) imposed.\
**Table 1.**
Recent NLO analyses (see the third paper in ) have been carried out within the framework of the fixed flavor scheme with \(f=3\) active light flavors and with a purely perturbative charm quark generated in a photon-gluon fusion (PGF) process. Such type of analyses for the complete SF \(F_2(x,Q^2)\) cannot be done at LO. [^4] Therefore, we should use some fixed values of active quarks. Nevertheless, we would like to note that the results obtained here and those in ---, where various schemes were used, are very stable and close to each other.
# Rescaling model
In the rescaling model SF \(F_2\) and, therefore, valence part of quark densities, gets modified in the case of a nucleus \(A\) at intermediate and large \(x\) values \((0.2 \leq x \leq 0.9)\) as follows \[F_2^A(x,\mu^2) = F_2(x,\mu^2_{A,v}),~~~ f_{NS}^A(x,\mu^2) = f_{NS}(x,\mu^2_{A,v}), \label{va.1}\] where a new scale \(\mu^2_{A,v}\) is related with \(\mu^2\) as \[\mu^2_{A,v} = \label{va.1a}\] where some additional scale \(\tilde{\mu}^2=0.66\) GeV\(^2\), which was in its turn an initial point in a \(\mu^2\)-evolution performed in ; it is then estimated in Appendix A of that paper. The quantity \(\lambda_A/\lambda_N\) stands for the ratio of quark confinement radii in a nucleus \(A\) and nucleon. The values of \(\lambda_A/\lambda_N\) and \(were evaluated for different nuclei and presented in Tables I and II in~. Since the factor\) to some \(\mu^2\) independent one. To this end, we consider the variable \(\ln(\mu^2_{A,v}/\Lambda^2)\), which has the following form (from Eq. ([\[va.1a\]](#va.1a){reference-type="ref" reference="va.1a"})) \[\ln\left(\frac{\mu^2_{A,v}}{\Lambda^2}\right) = \ln\left(\frac{\mu^2}{\Lambda^2}\right) \cdot \Bigl(1+ \delta^A_v\Bigr) \label{va.1b}\] where the nuclear correction factor \(\delta^A_v\) becomes \(\mu^2\) independent: \[\delta^A_v = \frac{1}{\ln\left(\tilde{\mu}^2/\Lambda^2\right)} \, \ln\left(\frac{\lambda_A^2}{\lambda_N^2}\right)\,, \label{delta}\] where it is seen that two parameters, namely, the scale \(\tilde{\mu}\) and ratio \(\lambda_A/\lambda_N\), are combined to form a \(Q^2\)-independent quantity. Using Eqs. ([\[va.1b\]](#va.1b){reference-type="ref" reference="va.1b"}) and/or ([\[delta\]](#delta){reference-type="ref" reference="delta"}), we can recover results for \(\delta^A_v\), which are presented in Table 2. **Table 2.**
Since our parton densities contain the variable \(s\) defined in Eq. ([\[intro:1a\]](#intro:1a){reference-type="ref" reference="intro:1a"}), it is convenient to consider its \(A\) modification. It has the following simple form: \[s^A_v \equiv \ln \left(\frac{\ln\left(\mu^2_{A,v}/\Lambda^2\right)}{\ln\left(\mu^2_{0}/\Lambda^2\right)}\right) = s +\ln\Bigl(1+\delta^A_v\Bigr) \approx s +\delta^A_v,~~~ \label{sA}\] i.e. the nuclear modification of the basic variable \(s\) depends on the \(\mu^2\) independent parameter \(\delta^A_v\), which possesses very small values.
# Rescaling model al low \(x\)
Standard evidence coming from earlier studies contains conclusion about inapplicability of the rescaling model at small \(x\) values (see, for example, ). It looks like it can be related with some simplifications of low \(x\) analyses (see, for example, , where the rise in EMC ratio was wrongly predicted at small \(x\) values). Using an accurate study of DGLAP equations at low \(x\) within the framework of the generalized DAS approach, it is possible to achieve nice agreement with the experimental data for the DIS structure functon \(F_2\) (see previous section)[^5]. Therefore, we believe that all these indicate toward success in describing the EMC ratio by using the same approach. We note that the main difference between global fits and DAS approach is in the restriction of applicability of the latter by low \(x\) region only, while the advantage of the DAS approach lies in the analytic solution to DGLAP equations. Thus, we are trying to apply the DAS approach to low \(x\) region of EMC effect using a simple fact that the rise of parton densities increases with increasing \(Q^2\) values. This way, with scales of PDF evolutions less than \(Q^2\) (i.e. \(\mu^2 \leq Q^2\)) in nuclear cases, we can directly reproduce the shadowing effect which is observed in the global fits. Since there are two components ([\[8.01\]](#8.01){reference-type="ref" reference="8.01"}) for each parton density, we have two free parameters \(\mu_{\pm}\) to be fit in the analyses of experimental data for EMC effect at low \(x\) values. An application of the rescaling model at low \(x\) can be incorporated at LO as follows: \[\begin{aligned}
F^A_2(x,\mu^2) &=& e \, f^A_q(x,\mu^2),~~ F^N_2(x,\mu^2) = e \, f_q(x,\mu^2), \nonumber \\ f^A_a(x,\mu^2) &=& f_a^{A,+}(x,\mu^2) + f_a^{A,-}(x,\mu^2),~~(a=q,g),~~ f^{A,\pm}_a(x,\mu^2) = f^{\pm}_a(x,\mu^2_{A,\pm}) \,, \label{8.02A} \end{aligned}\] with a similar definition of \(\mu^2_{A,\pm}\) as in the previous section (up to replacement \(v \to \pm\)). The expressions for \(f^{\pm}_a(x,\mu^2)\) are given in Eqs. ([\[8.01\]](#8.01){reference-type="ref" reference="8.01"}) and ([\[8.02\]](#8.02){reference-type="ref" reference="8.02"}). Then, the corresponding values of \(s^A_{\pm}\) are found to be \[s^A_{\pm} \equiv \ln \left(\frac{\ln\left(\mu^2_{A,\pm}/\Lambda^2\right)}{\ln\left(\mu^2_{0}/\Lambda^2\right)}\right) = s +\ln\Bigl(1+\delta^A_{\pm}\Bigr)\,, \label{sApm}\] because of the saturation at low \(x\) values for all considered \(Q^2\) values, which in our case should be related with decreasing the arguments of "\(\pm\)" component. Therefore, the values of \(\delta^A_{\pm}\) should be negative.
# Analysis of the low \(x\) data for nucleus
Note that it is usually convenient to study the following ratio (see Fig. 1 in Ref. ) \[R^{AD}_{F2}(x,\mu^2) = \frac{F^A_2(x,\mu^2)}{F^D_2(x,\mu^2)}\. \label{AD}\] Using the fact that the nuclear effect in a deutron is very small (see Table 1 for the values of \(\delta^A_{v}\) and discussions in ) [^6], we can suggest that \[\begin{aligned}
F^D_2(x,\mu^2) &=& e \, f_q(x,\mu^2),~~ F^A_2(x,\mu^2) = e \, \overline{f}^{A}_q(x,\mu^2), \nonumber \\ \overline{f}^{A}_a(x,\mu^2) &=& \overline{f}_a^{A,+}(x,\mu^2) + \overline{f}_a^{A,-}(x,\mu^2),~~(a=q,g),~~ \overline{f}^{A,\pm}_a(x,\mu^2) = f^{\pm}_a(x,\mu^2_{AD,\pm}) \,, \label{AD1} \end{aligned}\] i.e. \[\begin{aligned}
\overline{f}^{A,+}_g(x,\mu^2) &=& \biggl(A_g + \frac{4}{9} A_q \biggl) I_0(\sigma^{AD}_{+}) \; e^{-\overline d_{+} s^{AD}_{+}} + O(\rho^{AD}_{+}), \nonumber \\ \overline{f}^{A,+}_q(x,\mu^2) &=& \frac{f}{9} \biggl(A_g + \frac{4}{9} A_q \biggl) \rho^{AD}_{+} I_1(\sigma^{AD}_{+}) \; e^{-\overline d_{+} s^{AD}_{+}} + O(\rho^{AD}_{+}), \label{8.01AD} \\ \overline{f}^{A,-}_g(x,\mu^2) &=&-\frac{4}{9} A_q e^{-d_{-} s^{AD}_{-}} \, + \, O(x),~~ \overline{f}^{A,-}_q(x,\mu^2) = A_q e^{-d_{-}(1) s^{AD}_{-}} \, + \, O(x), \label{8.02AD} \end{aligned}\] where \[\begin{aligned}
&&\sigma^{AD}_{+}=\sigma(s\to s^{AD}_{+}),~~\rho^{AD}_{+}=\rho(s\to s^{AD}_{+}),~~ \nonumber \\ &&s^{AD}_{\pm} \equiv \ln \left(\frac{\ln\left(\mu^2_{AD,\pm}/\Lambda^2\right)}{\ln\left(\mu^2_{0}/\Lambda^2\right)}\right) = s +\ln\Bigl(1+\delta^{AD}_{\pm}\Bigr) \,. \end{aligned}\] We obtain the values of \(\delta^{AD}_{+}\) and \(\delta^{AD}_{-}\) by fitting NMC experimenal data for the EMC ratio at low \(x\) in the case of different nuclei. Since the experimental data for lithium and carbon are most precise and contain the maximal number of points (16 points for each nucleus), we preform combined fits of these data. Obtained results (with \(\chi^{2}_{an}\)=27 and \(\chi^{2}_{fr}\)=43 for 32 points) are presented in Table 3 and shown in Fig. 2.
As can be seen in Fig. 2 there is large difference between the fits with "frozen" and analytic versions of the strong couling constant. This is in contrast with the analysis done in Section 1 and results done in the earlier papers . It seems that this difference comes about because we include in the analysis the region of very low \(Q^2\) values, where "frozen" and analytic strong couling constants are observed to be rather different (see also ).
# \(A\) dependence at low \(x\)
Taking NMC experimental data along with E665 and HERMES Collaborations for the EMC ratio at low \(x\) in the case of different nuclei, we can find the \(A\) dependence of \(\delta^{AD}_{\pm}\), which can be parameterized as follows \[-\delta^{AD}_{\pm} = c^{(1)}_{\pm} + c^{(2)}_{\pm} A^{1/3}. \label{AD2}\] As it was already mentioned in the previous section, usage of the analytic coupling constant leads to the fits with smaller \(\chi^2\) values. For example, the values of \(c^{(1)}_{\pm}\) and \(c^{(2)}_{\pm}\) found in the combined fit of the data (76 points) when the analytic coupling constant is used (with \(\chi^2=89\)) look like \[\begin{aligned}
&& c^{(1)}_{+,an} =-0.055 \pm 0.015,~~ c^{(2)}_{+,an} = 0.068 \pm 0.006,~~ \nonumber \\ && c^{(1)}_{-,an} = 0.071 \pm 0.101,~~ c^{(2)}_{-,an} = 0.120\pm 0.039 \,. \end{aligned}\] [\[AD2.an\]]{#AD2.an label="AD2.an"} Now, using the \(A\) dependence ([\[AD2\]](#AD2){reference-type="ref" reference="AD2"}), \(R^{AD}_{F2}(x,\mu^2)\) values for any nucleus \(A\) can be predicted. What is more, we can consider also the ratios \(R^{AD}_{a}(x,\mu^2)\) of parton densities in a nucleus and deutron themselves, \[R^{AD}_{a}(x,\mu^2) = \frac{\overline{f}^A_a(x,\mu^2)}{f_a(x,\mu^2)},~~ (a=q,g) \,, \label{ADa}\] with \(\overline{f}^A_a(x,\mu^2)\) and \({f_a(x,\mu^2)}\) defined in Eqs. ([\[AD1\]](#AD1){reference-type="ref" reference="AD1"})---([\[AD2\]](#AD2){reference-type="ref" reference="AD2"}) and ([\[8.01\]](#8.01){reference-type="ref" reference="8.01"})---([\[intro:1b\]](#intro:1b){reference-type="ref" reference="intro:1b"}), respecively. Indeed, at LO \(R^{AD}_{q}(x,\mu^2)=R^{AD}_{F2}(x,\mu^2)\); therefore, results for \(R^{AD}_{q}(x,\mu^2)\) are already known. Since all the parameters of PDFs found within the framework of the generalized DAS approach are now fixed we can predict the ratio \(R^{AD}_{g}(x,\mu^2)\) of the gluon densities in a nucleus and nucleon given in Eqs. ([\[8.01\]](#8.01){reference-type="ref" reference="8.01"}), ([\[8.02\]](#8.02){reference-type="ref" reference="8.02"}), ([\[8.01AD\]](#8.01AD){reference-type="ref" reference="8.01AD"}) and ([\[8.02AD\]](#8.02AD){reference-type="ref" reference="8.02AD"}), which is currently under intensive studies (see a recent paper and review along with references and discussion therein). The results for \(R^{AD}_{F2}(x,\mu^2)\) and \(R^{AD}_{g}(x,\mu^2)\), depicted in Fig. 3, show some difference between these ratios. It is also seen that the difference is similar to that obtained in a recent EPPS16 analysis (see the first paper in ) [^7]. However, what for \(R^{AD}_{F2}(x,\mu^2)\) and \(R^{AD}_{g}(x,\mu^2)\) themselves (irrespective of other results), we obtain a bit stronger effect at lowest \(x\) values, which does in fact not contradict the experimental data collected by the LHCb experiment (see recent review in ). Such a strong effect is also well compatible with the leading order EPPS09 analysis (which can also be found in ). It will be interesting to delve into more in-depth studies of the ratio \(R^{AD}_{g}(x,\mu^2)\), which is one of our aims in the future.
# SF \(F_{2c}\) at low \(x\)
Several years ago H1 and ZEUS Collaborations at HERA have separately presented their new data on the charm structure function \(F_{2c}\)[^8] and more recently they have combined these data on \(F_{2c}(x,\mu^2)\) . The SF \(F_{2c}\) was found to be around 25% of \(F_{2}\), which is considerably larger than what was observed by the European Muon Collaboration (EMC) at CERN at larger \(x\) values, where it was only aroung 1% of \(F_{2}\). Ensuing and very extensive theoretical analyses were carried out to establish that the \(F_{2c}\) data can be described through the perturbative generation of charm in QCD. In view of this, a PGF process in experiments with nucleon and nucleus targetsis one of the most effective and promising studies of gluon density (see a recent review ). Following the SF \(F_{2c}\) at low \(x\) can be represented in the framework of the generalized DAS approach as follows \[F_{2c}(x,\mu^2) = e^2_c \, a_s(\mu_c) \, C_{2,g}(1, z_c(\mu^2)) f_g(x,\mu^2),~~~ z_c(\mu^2)=\frac{m^2_c(\mu^2)}{\mu^2},~~~ e_c=\frac{2}{3} \,, \label{c.1}\] where \(C_{2,g}(1, z_c(\mu^2))\) is a first Mellin moment of the LO PGF coefficient function \(\tilde{C}_{2,g}(x, z_c(\mu^2))\). It can be obtained from the QED case by adjusting the coupling constants (see also the direct calculations in ). The Mellin moment \(C_{2,g}(1, z_c(\mu^2))\) has a very compact form : \[C_{2,g}(1, z) = \frac{2}{3} \, \left[ 1-\frac{2(1-z)}{\sqrt{1+4z}} \, \ln \frac{\sqrt{1+4z}-1}{\sqrt{1+4z}+1} \right] \,. \label{c.1a}\] The gluon density \(f_g(x,\mu^2)\) is determined in ([\[8.01\]](#8.01){reference-type="ref" reference="8.01"}) and ([\[8.02\]](#8.02){reference-type="ref" reference="8.02"}). The scale \(\mu_c\) in ([\[c.1\]](#c.1){reference-type="ref" reference="c.1"}) is actually not fixed because the results for \(F_{2c}\) are at LO. There are two widespread scales, \(\mu_c^2=4m_c^2\) and \(\mu_c^2=4m_c^2+\mu^2\). We will use below both of them (see Subsect. 7.1). In the framework of the rescaling model the SF \(F^A_{2c}(x,\mu^2)\) for nucleus \(A\) can be represented as follows \[F^A_{2c}(x,\mu^2) = e_c^2 \, \sum_{i=\pm} a_s(\mu_c(\mu^2_{A,i})) \, C_{2,g}(1,z_c(\mu^2_{A,i})) f^{i}_g(x,\mu^2_{A,i})\,, \label{c.2}\] where the scale \(\mu^2_{A,i}\) looks like \[\mu^2_{A,\pm}= \Lambda^2 {\left(\frac{\mu^2}{\Lambda^2}\right)}^{1+\delta^A_{\pm}} = \mu^2 {\left(\frac{\mu^2}{\Lambda^2}\right)}^{\delta^A_{\pm}} \,, \label{c.3}\] as it follows from ([\[va.1\]](#va.1){reference-type="ref" reference="va.1"}) with the replacement \(v \to \pm\). The results for the ratios \(R^{A}_{F2}(x,\mu^2)\), \(R^{A}_{g}(x,\mu^2)\) and \[R^{A}_{c}(x,\mu^2)= \frac{F^A_{2c}(x,\mu^2)}{F_{2c}(x,\mu^2)}\] should be rather similar. Moreover, they have similar \(x\)-dependences, as it will be shown in the following subsection.
## Analysis of the low \(x\) data
To have as close a relation with analyses in Sect. 5 as possible, let us consider the ratio \[R^{AD}_{c}(x,\mu^2)= \frac{F^A_{2c}(x,\mu^2)}{F^D_{2c}(x,\mu^2)}\. \label{c.4}\] As in Sect. 5, we will use the following expressions for the SFs \[\begin{aligned}
&& F^D_{2c}(x,\mu^2) = e^2_c \, a_s(\mu_c) \,C_{2,g}(1, a_c(\mu^2)) \, f_g(x,\mu^2), \nonumber \\ && F^A_{2c}(x,\mu^2) =e_c^2 \, \sum_{i=\pm} a_s(\mu_c(\mu^2_{AD,i})) \, C_{2,g}(1, z_c(\mu^2_{AD,i})) \, \overline{f}^{A,\pm}_g(x,\mu^2) \,, \label{c.6} \end{aligned}\] where the gluon density \(\overline{f}^{A,\pm}_a(x,\mu^2)= f^{\pm}_a(x,\mu^2_{AD,\pm})\) is defined in ([\[8.01AD\]](#8.01AD){reference-type="ref" reference="8.01AD"}) and ([\[8.02AD\]](#8.02AD){reference-type="ref" reference="8.02AD"}). The scale \(\mu^2_{AD,\pm}\) can be obtained from ([\[c.3\]](#c.3){reference-type="ref" reference="c.3"}) with the replacement \(\delta^A_{\pm} \to \delta^{AD}_{\pm}\), by analogy with analyses in Sect. 5. The results for the ratios \(R^{AD}_{c}(x,\mu^2)\), \[R^{AD}_{cg}(x,\mu^2)= \frac{R^{AD}_{c}(x,\mu^2)}{R^{AD}_{g}(x,\mu^2)}~~\mbox{ and } R^{AD}_{c2}(x,\mu^2)= \frac{R^{AD}_{c}(x,\mu^2)}{R^{AD}_{F2}(x,\mu^2)} \label{c.7}\] are presented in Fig. 4 for \(\mu^2\) = 10 GeV\(^2\). Since the \(\mu^2\)-dependence of \(m_c\) is not strong, we use fixed \(m_c=1.27\) GeV in our analysis. As can be seen in Fig. 4, results look very much the same for both scales of \(\mu_c\). What is more, a behavior of the ratio \(R^{AD}_{c}(x,\mu^2)\) is a little bit weaker than that of \(R^{AD}_{F2}(x,\mu^2)\) and a bit stronger than that observed for \(R^{AD}_{g}(x,\mu^2)\). We hope that the \(x\)-dependence of the ratio \(R^{AD}_{c}(x,\mu^2)\), along with that of \(R^{AD}_{g}(x,\mu^2)\), can be measured at a future Electron--Ion Collider (see and discussion therein).
# Conclusion
Using a recent progress in the application of double-logarithmic approximations (see and ) to the studies of small \(x\) behavior of the structure and fragmentation functions, respectively, we applied the DAS approach to examine an EMC \(F_2\) structure function ratio between various nuclei and a deutron. Within a framework of the rescaling model good agreement between theoretical predictions and respective experimental data is achieved. The theoretical formulæ contain certain parameters, whose values were fit in the analyses of experimental data. Once the fits are carried out we have predictions for the corresponding ratios of parton densities without free parameters. These results were used to predict small \(x\) behavior of the gluon density in nuclei, which is at present poorly known. The ratios \(R^{AD}_{a}(x,\mu^2)\) \((a=q,g)\) predicted in the present paper are compatible with those given by various groups working in the area. From our point of view, it is quite valuable that the application of the rescaling model provided us with very simple forms for these ratios. It should also be mentioned that without any free parameters we can predict the ratio \(R^{AD}_{c}(x,\mu^2)\) of charm parts, \(F^{A}_{2c}(x,\mu^2)\) and \(F^{D}_{2c}(x,\mu^2)\), of the respective structure functions. This latter ratio has a simple form and it is very similar to the corresponding ratio of the complete structure functions \(F^{A}_{2}(x,\mu^2)\) and \(F^{D}_{2}(x,\mu^2)\). Following we plan to extend our analysis to the NLO level of approximation, the accuracy that is currently a standard in nPDF studies. Also, we are going to consider a rather broad range of the Bjorken variable \(x\) by using parametrizations of parton densities, which will be constructed by analogy with the one obtained earlier in the valence quark case (see ). The usage of such type of parametrizations will make it possible to carry out the present analysis of the data accumulated within the range of intermediate \(x\) values, which is presently under active considerations.\
Support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11575254) is acknowledged. A.V.K. and B.G.S. thank Institute of Modern Physics for invitation. A.V.K. is also grateful to the CAS President's International Fellowship Initiative (Grant No. 2017VMA0040) for support. The work of A.V.K. and B.G.S. was in part supported by the RFBR Foundation through the Grant No. 16-02-00790-a.
[^1]: Sometimes, in the analyses of DIS experimental data it is convenient to use an exact solution to DGLAP equations in the Mellin moment space and reconstruct SF \(F_2\) from the moments (see recent paper and references and discussions therein). The studies of nuclear effects in such a type of analyses can be found in , though its consideration is beyond the scope of the present study.
[^2]: Note that the variables \(d_{\pm}(n)\) are ratios \(\gamma_{\pm}^{(\rm LO)}(n)/(2\beta_0)\) of LO anomalous dimensions \(\gamma_{\pm}^{(\rm LO)}(n)\) and LO coefficient \(\beta_0\) of QCD \(\beta\)-function.
[^3]: There are a number of various approaches to define the value of this gluon mass and even the form of its momentum dependence (see, e.g., a recent review ).
[^4]: Notice that the SF \(F_{2c}(x,Q^2)\), the charm part of \(F_2(x,Q^2)\), appears with \(a_s(Q^2)\) and can be confronted already at LO with the data produced in a PGF process (see Sect. 7 below).
[^5]: Moreover, using an analogous approach, good agreement was also found with the corresponding data for jet multiplicites .
[^6]: The study of nuclear effects in a deutron can be found in , which also contains short reviews of preliminary investigations.
[^7]: Note that the result for \(R^{AD}_{g}(x,\mu^2)\) along with its uncertainty is completely determined by both the rescaling model and the analytic form for parton densities at low \(x\) values we've used. Therefore, it is clear that the light green band for \(R^{AD}_{g}(x,\mu^2)\) should become broader due to a freedom in using various models. Also note that a comparison between two uncertainty bands shown in Fig. 3 is in some sense misleading. The pink band is much broader since the EPPS16 global analysis included a fit to all available data across quite a wide range in \(x\) as opposed to small \(x\) consideration adopted in the present paper. Nonetheless, we decided to quote it here just to give the reader an idea about the subject, at least qualitatively.
[^8]: Open charm production was also observed in the COMPASS fixed target experiment . | {'timestamp': '2017-11-21T02:10:45', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01849', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01849'} |
null | null |
null | null |
# Introduction
Learning distributions is a fundamental problem in statistics and computer science, and has numerous applications in machine learning and signal processing. The problem can be stated as:
> Given an i.i.d. sample generated from an unknown probability distribution \(g\), find a distribution \(\hat{g}\) that is close to \(g\) in total variation distance.[^1]
This strong notion of learning is not possible in general using a finite number of samples. However, if we assume that the target distribution belongs to or can be approximated by a family of distributions, then there is hope to acquire algorithms with finite-sample guarantees. In this paper, we study the important family of mixture models within this framework. Notice that we consider PAC learning of distributions (a.k.a. density estimation), which is different from parameter estimation. In the parameter estimation problem, it is assumed that the target distribution belongs to some parametric class, and the goal is to learn/identify the parameters (see, e.g., ). As an example of our setting, assume that the target distribution is a Gaussian mixture with \(k\) components in \(\mathbb{R}^d\). Then, how many examples do we need to find a distribution that is \(\epsilon\)-close to the target? This *sample complexity* question, as well as the corresponding *computational complexity* question, has received a lot of attention recently (see, e.g. ). In this paper, we consider a scenario in which we are given a method for learning a class of distributions (e.g., Gaussians). Then, we ask whether we can use it, as a black box, to come up with an algorithm for learning a mixture of such distributions (e.g., mixture of Gaussians). We will show that the answer to this question is affirmative. We propose a generic method for learning mixture models. Roughly speaking, we show that by going from learning a single distribution from a class to learning a mixture of \(k\) distributions from the same class, the sample complexity is multiplied by a factor of at most \({(k\log^2 k)}/{\epsilon^2}\). This result is general, and yet it is surprisingly tight in many important cases. In this paper, we assume that the algorithm knows the number of components \(k\). As a demonstration, we show that our method provides a better sample complexity for learning mixtures of Gaussians than the state of the art. In particular, for learning mixtures of \(k\) Gaussians in \(\mathbb{R}^d\), our method requires \(\widetilde{O}({d^2k}/{\epsilon^4})\) samples, improving by a factor of \(k^2\) over the \(\widetilde{O}({d^2k^3}/{\epsilon^4})\) bound of . Furthermore, for the special case of mixtures of axis-aligned Gaussians, we provide an upper bound of \(\widetilde{O}({dk}/{\epsilon^{4}})\), which is the first optimal bound with respect to \(k\) and \(d\) up to logarithmic factors, and improves upon the \(\widetilde{O}({dk^9}/{\epsilon^{4}})\) bound of , which is only shown for the subclass of spherical Gaussians. One merit of our approach is that it can be applied in the agnostic (a.k.a. robust) setting, where the target distribution does not necessarily belong to the mixture model of choice. To guarantee such a result, we need the black box to work in the agnostic setting. For example, an agnostic learning method for learning Gaussians can be lifted to work for Gaussian mixtures in the agnostic setting. We would like to emphasize that our focus is on the information-theoretic aspects of learning rather than the computational ones; in particular, although our framework is algorithmic, its running time is exponential in the number of required samples. Proving sample complexity bounds is important in understanding the statistical nature of various classes of distributions (see, e.g., the recent work of ), and may pave the way for developing efficient algorithms.
## Our Results
Let \(\mathcal F\) be a class of probability distributions, and let \(\mathcal{F}^k\) denote the class of \(k\)-mixtures of elements of \(\mathcal F\). In our main result, Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}, assuming the existence of a method for learning \(\mathcal F\) with sample complexity \(m_{\mathcal{F}}(\epsilon)\), we provide a method for learning \(\mathcal F^k\) with sample complexity \(O({k\log^2 k \cdot m_{\mathcal F}(\varepsilon) }/{\epsilon^{2}})\). Our mixture learning algorithm has the property that, if the \(\mathcal F\)-learner is proper, then the \(\mathcal F^k\)-learner would be proper as well (i.e., the learner will always output a member of \(\mathcal{F}^k\)). Furthermore, the algorithm works in the more general agnostic setting provided that the base learners are agnostic learners. We provide several applications of our main result. In Theorem [\[axisalignedupperbound\]](#axisalignedupperbound){reference-type="ref" reference="axisalignedupperbound"}, we show that the class of mixtures of \(k\) axis-aligned Gaussians in \(\mathbb{R}^d\) is PAC-learnable in the agnostic setting with sample complexity \(O({kd\log^2 k}/{\epsilon ^ 4})\) (see Theorem [\[thm:lowerbound\]](#thm:lowerbound){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:lowerbound"}). This bound is tight in terms of \(k\) and \(d\) up to logarithmic factors. In Theorem [\[gaussianupperbound\]](#gaussianupperbound){reference-type="ref" reference="gaussianupperbound"}, we show that the class of mixtures of \(k\) Gaussians in \(\mathbb{R}^d\) is PAC-learnable in the agnostic setting with sample complexity \(O({kd^2\log^2 k}/{\epsilon ^ 4})\). Finally, in Theorem [\[logconcave\]](#logconcave){reference-type="ref" reference="logconcave"}, we prove that the class of mixtures of \(k\) log-concave distributions over \(\mathbb{R}^d\) is PAC-learnable using \(\widetilde{O}(d^{(d+5)/2}\varepsilon^{-(d+9)/2}k)\) samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first upper bound on the sample complexity of learning this class.
## Related Work
PAC learning of distributions was introduced by , we refer the reader to for a recent survey. A closely related line of research in statistics (in which more emphasis is on sample complexity) is density estimation, for which the book by is an excellent resource. One approach for studying the sample complexity of learning a class of distributions is bounding the VC-dimension of its associated Yatrocas class (see Definition [\[def_yatrocas\]](#def_yatrocas){reference-type="ref" reference="def_yatrocas"}), and applying results such as Theorem [\[thm:distributionVC\]](#thm:distributionVC){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:distributionVC"}[^2]. In particular, the VC-dimension bound of --which is based on the work of --implies a sample complexity upper bound of \(O((k^4d^2+k^3d^3)/\varepsilon^2)\) for PAC learning mixtures of axis-aligned Gaussians, and an upper bound of \(O(k^4d^4/\varepsilon^2)\) for PAC learning mixtures of general Gaussians (both results hold in the more general agnostic setting). A sample complexity upper bound of \(O(d^2 k^3 \log^2k / \varepsilon^4)\) for learning mixtures of Gaussians in the realizable setting was proved in (the running time of their algorithm is not polynomial). Our algorithm is motivated by theirs, but we have introduced several new ideas in the algorithm and in the analysis, which has resulted in improving the sample complexity bound by a factor of \(k^2\) and an algorithm that works in the more general agnostic setting. For mixtures of spherical Gaussians, a polynomial time algorithm for the realizable setting with sample complexity \(O(dk^9\log^2(d)/\varepsilon^4)\) was proposed in. We improve their sample complexity by a factor of \(\widetilde{O}(k^8)\), and moreover our algorithm works in the agnostic setting, too. In the special case of \(d=1\), a non-proper agnostic polynomial time algorithm with the optimal sample complexity of \(\widetilde{O}(k/\varepsilon^2)\) was given in , and a proper agnostic algorithm with the same sample complexity and better running time was given in . An important question, which we do not address in this paper, is finding polynomial time algorithms for learning distributions. See for the state-of-the-art results on computational complexity of learning mixtures of Gaussians. Another important setting is computational complexity in the agnostic learning, see, e.g., for some positive results. A related line of research is parameter estimation for mixtures of Gaussians, see, e.g., , who gave polynomial time algorithms for this problem assuming certain separability conditions (these algorithms are polynomial in the dimension and the error tolerance but exponential in the number of components). Recall that parameter estimation is a more difficult problem and any algorithm for parameter estimation requires some separability assumptions for the target Gaussians[^3], whereas for density estimation no such assumption is needed. We finally remark that characterizing the sample complexity of learning a class of distributions in general is an open problem, even for the realizable (i.e., non-agnostic) case (see ).
# The Formal Framework
Generally speaking, a *distribution learning method* is an algorithm that takes a sample of i.i.d. points from distribution \(g\) as input, and outputs (a description) of a distribution \(\hat{g}\) as an estimation for \(g\). Furthermore, we assume that \(g\) belongs to or can be approximated by class \(\mathcal{F}\) of distributions, and we may require that \(\hat{g}\) also belongs to this class (i.e., proper learning). Let \(f_1\) and \(f_2\) be two probability distributions defined over the Borel \(\sigma\)-algebra \(\mathcal{B}\). The total variation distance between \(f_1\) and \(f_2\) is defined as \[\|f_1-f_2\|_{TV} = \sup_{B\in \mathcal{B}}|f_1(B)-f_2(B)| = \frac{1}{2}\|f_1-f_2\|_1 \:,\] where \[\|f\|_1\coloneqq \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} |f(x)|\mathrm{d} x\] is the \(L_1\) norm of \(f\). In the following definitions, \(\mathcal{F}\) is a class of probability distributions, and \(g\) is a distribution not necessarily in \(\mathcal{F}\). Denote the set \(\{1,2...,m\}\) by \([m]\). All logarithms are in the natural base. For a function \(g\) and a class of distributions \(\mathcal{F}\), we define \[\opt(\mathcal{F}, g) \coloneqq \inf_{f\in \mathcal{F}}\|f-g\|_1\]
Clearly, a \(C\)-agnostic PAC-learner (for any constant \(C\)) is also a realizable PAC-learner, with the same error parameter \(\varepsilon\). Conversely a realizable PAC-learner can be thought of an \(\infty\)-agnostic PAC-learner.
# Learning Mixture Models
Let \(\Delta_n\) denote the \(n\)-dimensional simplex: \[\Delta_n \:= \{ (w_1,\dots,w_n): w_i\geq 0, \sum_{i=1}^k w_i=1\}\]
Assume that we have a method to PAC-learn \(\mathcal{F}\). Does this mean that we can PAC-learn \(\mathcal{F}^k\)? And if so, what is the sample complexity of this task? Our main theorem gives an affirmative answer to the first question, and provides a bound for sample complexity of learning \(\mathcal{F}^k\).
Since a realizable PAC-learner is an \(\infty\)-agnostic PAC-learner, we immediately obtain the following corollary.
Some remarks:
1. Our mixture learning algorithm has the property that, if the \(\mathcal F\)-learner is proper, then the \(\mathcal F^k\)-learner is proper as well.
2. The computational complexity of the resulting algorithm is exponential in the number of required samples.
3. The condition \(\lambda(\mathcal F,\delta) = \Omega(\log(1/\delta))\) is a technical condition that holds for all interesting classes \(\mathcal F\).
4. One may wonder about tightness of this theorem. In Theorem 2 in, it is shown that if \(\mathcal F\) is the class of spherical Gaussians, we have \(m_{\mathcal{F}^k}^{O(1)}(\epsilon, \delta) = \Omega(k m_{\mathcal F}(\varepsilon, \delta/k) )\), therefore, the factor of \(k\) is necessary in general. However, it is not clear whether the additional factor of \(\log k /\varepsilon^2\) in the theorem is tight.
5. The constant 3 (in the \(3C\)-agnostic result) comes from (see Theorem [\[thm:candidates\]](#thm:candidates){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:candidates"}), and it is not clear whether it is necessary. If we allow for randomized algorithms (which produce a random distribution whose expected distance to the target is bounded by \(\varepsilon\)), then the constant can be improved to 2, see.
In the rest of this section we prove Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}. Let \(g\) be the true data generating distribution, and let \[\label{def_rho} g^* = \argmin_{f \in\mathcal{F}^k} \|g-f\|_1 \textnormal{ and } \rho = \|g^*-g\|_1=\opt(\mathcal F^k,g)\:.\] Note that although \(g^*\in\mathcal{F}^k\), \(g\) itself is not necessarily in the form of a mixture. Since our algorithm works for mixtures, we would first like to write \(g\) in the form of a mixture of \(k\) distributions, such that they are on average close to being in \(\mathcal{F}\). This is done via the following lemma.
By Lemma [\[lem:projection\]](#lem:projection){reference-type="ref" reference="lem:projection"}, we have \(g = \sum_{i\in [k]} w_i {G_i},\) where each \(G_i\) is a probability distribution. Let \(\rho_i \coloneqq \opt (\mathcal{F}, G_i)\), and by the lemma we have \[\sum_{i \in[k]} w_i \rho_i = \rho.\label{sumrhoiisrho}.\] The idea now is to learn each of the \(G_i\)'s separately using the agnostic learner for \(\mathcal{F}\). We will view \(g\) as a mixture of \(k\) distributions \(G_1,G_2,\dots,G_k\). For proving Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}, we will use the following theorem on learning finite classes of distributions, which immediately follows from and a standard Chernoff bound.
We now describe an algorithm that with probability \(\geq 1-\delta\) outputs a distribution with \(L_1\) distance \(13\varepsilon + 3C\rho\) to \(g\) (the error parameter is \(13\varepsilon\) instead of \(\varepsilon\) just for convenience of the proof; it is clear that this does not change the order of magnitude of sample complexity). The algorithm, whose pseudocode is shown in Figure [\[fig:alg\]](#fig:alg){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:alg"}, has two main steps. In the first step we generate a set of candidate distributions, such that at least one of them is \((3\varepsilon+\rho)\)-close to \(g\) in \(L_1\) distance. These candidates are of the form \(\sum_{i=1}^{k} \widehat{w}_i \widehat{G}_i\), where the \(\widehat{G}_i\)'s are extracted from samples and are estimates for the real components \(G_i\), and the \(\widehat{w}_i\)'s come from a fixed discretization of \(\Delta_k\), and are estimates for the real mixing weights \(w_i\). In the second step, we use Theorem [\[thm:candidates\]](#thm:candidates){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:candidates"} to obtain a distribution that is \((13\varepsilon+3C\rho)\)-close to \(g\). We start with describing the first step. We take \[\label{s_def} s= \max \left \{ \frac {2k\lambda(\mathcal F, \delta/3k)} { \varepsilon^{\alpha} }, \frac{16 k \log(3k/\delta)}{\varepsilon} \right\}\] i.i.d. samples from \(g\). Let \(S\) denote the set of generated points. Note that \(\lambda(\mathcal F,\delta)=\Omega(\log(1/\delta))\) implies \[s=O({k\lambda (\mathcal F, \delta/3k) }\times {\epsilon^{-\alpha}}).\] Let \(\widehat{W}\) be an \(\varepsilon/k\)-cover for \(\Delta_k\) in \(\ell_{\infty}\) distance of cardinality \((k/\varepsilon+1)^k\). That is, for any \(x\in \Delta_k\) there exists \(w\in\widehat{W}\) such that \(\|w-x\|_{\infty}\leq\varepsilon/k\). This can be obtained from a grid in \([0,1]^k\) of side length \(\varepsilon/k\), which is an \(\varepsilon/k\)-cover for \([0,1]^k\), and projecting each of its points onto \(\Delta_k\). By an *assignment*, we mean a function \(A:S\to [k]\). The role of an assignment is to "guess" each sample point is coming from which component, by mapping them to a component index. For each pair \((A,(\widehat{w}_1,\dots,\widehat{w}_k))\), where \(A\) is an assignment and \((\widehat{w}_1,\dots,\widehat{w}_k)\in \widehat{W}\), we generate a candidate distribution as follows: let \(A^{-1}(i)\subseteq S\) be those sample points that are assigned to component \(i\). For each \(i\in[k]\), we provide the set \(A^{-1}(i)\) of samples to our \(\mathcal F\)-learner, and the learner provides us with a distribution \(\widehat{G}_i\). We add the distribution \(\sum_{i\in [k]} \widehat{w}_i \widehat{G}_i\) to the set of candidate distributions.
Before proving the lemma, we show that it implies our main result, Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}. By the lemma, we obtain a set of candidates such that at least one of them is \((3\varepsilon+C\rho)\)-close to \(g\) (with failure probability \(\leq 2\delta/3\)). This step takes \(s= O({k\lambda (\mathcal F, \delta/3k) }\times {\epsilon^{-\alpha}})\) many samples. Then, we apply Theorem [\[thm:candidates\]](#thm:candidates){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:candidates"} to output one of those candidates that is \((13\varepsilon+3C\rho)\)-close to \(g\) (with failure probability \(\leq \delta/3\)), therefore using \(\log(3M^2/\delta)/2\varepsilon^2\) additional samples. Note that the number of generated candidate distributions is \(M = k^s \times (1+k/\varepsilon)^k\). Hence, in the second step of our algorithm, we take \[\begin{aligned}
\log(3M^2/\delta)/2\varepsilon^2 = O\left(\frac{\lambda (\mathcal F, \delta/3k) k\log k}{\epsilon^{\alpha+2}}\right) = O\left(\frac{m_{\mathcal F}(\varepsilon, \delta/3k) k\log k}{\epsilon^{2}}\right) \end{aligned}\] additional samples. The proof is completed noting the total failure probability is at most \(\delta\) by the union bound. We now prove Lemma [\[somecandidateisclose\]](#somecandidateisclose){reference-type="ref" reference="somecandidateisclose"}. We will use the following concentration inequality, which holds for any binomial random variable \(X\) (see ): \[\label{chernoffhalf} \Pr\{X < \mathbf{E} X/2\} \leq \exp(-\mathbf{E} X/8)\:.\] Say a component \(i\) is *negligible* if \[w_i \leq \frac{8 \log(3k/\delta)}{s}\] Let \(L\subseteq[k]\) denote the set of negligible components. Let \(i\) be a non-negligible component. Note that, the number of points coming from component \(i\) is binomial with parameters \(s\) and \(w_i\) and thus has mean \(s w_i\), so ([\[chernoffhalf\]](#chernoffhalf){reference-type="ref" reference="chernoffhalf"}) implies that, with probability at least \(1-\delta/3k\), \(S\) contains at least \(w_is/2\) points from \(i\). Since we have \(k\) components in total, the union bound implies that, with probability at least \(1-\delta/3\), uniformly for all \(i\notin L\), \(S\) contains at least \(w_is/2\) points from component \(i\). Now consider the pair \((A,(\widehat{w}_1,\dots,\widehat{w}_k))\) such that \(A\) assigns samples to their correct indices, and has the property that \(|\widehat{w}_i-w_i|\leq\varepsilon/k\) for all \(i\in[k]\). We claim that the resulting candidate distribution is \((3\varepsilon+C\rho)\)-close to \(g\). Let \(\widehat{G}_1,\dots,\widehat{G}_k\) be the distributions provided by the learner. For each \(i\in[k]\) define \[\varepsilon_i \coloneqq \left ( \frac {2\lambda(\mathcal F, \delta/3k)} { w_is } \right)^{1/\alpha}\] For any \(i\notin L\), since there exists at least \(w_is/2\) samples for component \(i\), and since \[w_is/2 = \lambda(\mathcal F, \delta/3k) \varepsilon_i^{-\alpha} = m_{\mathcal F} (\varepsilon_i, \delta/3k)\:,\] we are guaranteed that \(\|\widehat{G}_i-G_i\|_1\leq C\rho_i + \varepsilon_i\) with probability \(1-\delta/3k\) (recall that each \(G_i\) is \(\rho_i\)-close to the class \(\mathcal{F}\)). Therefore, \(\|\widehat{G}_i-G_i\|_1\leq C\rho_i+\varepsilon_i\) holds uniformly over all \(i\notin L\), with probability \(\geq 1-\delta/3\). Note that since \(\alpha\geq1\), the function \(w_i^{1-1/\alpha}\) is concave in \(w_i\), so by Jensen's inequality we have \[\sum_{i\in [k]} w_i^{1-1/\alpha} \leq k \left ( (\sum_{i\in [k]} w_i / k)^{1-1/\alpha}\right) = k^{1/\alpha}\:,\] hence \[\begin{aligned}
\sum_{i\notin L} w_i \varepsilon_i = \left ( \frac {2\lambda(\mathcal F, \delta/3k)} {s} \right)^{1/\alpha} \sum_{i\notin L} w_i^{1-1/\alpha} \leq \left ( \frac {2k\lambda(\mathcal F, \delta/3k)} {s } \right)^{1/\alpha}. \end{aligned}\] Also recall from ([\[sumrhoiisrho\]](#sumrhoiisrho){reference-type="ref" reference="sumrhoiisrho"}) that \(\sum_{i \in[k]}w_i \rho_i \leq \rho\). Proving the lemma is now a matter of careful applications of the triangle inequality: \[\begin{aligned}
\left\| \sum_{i\in [k]} \widehat{w}_i \widehat{G}_i-g\right\|_1 &= \left\| \sum_{i\in [k]} \widehat{w}_i \widehat{G}_i-\sum_{i\in [k]} w_i G_i \right\|_1\\ & \leq \left\|\sum_{i\in [k]} {w}_i (\widehat{G}_i-G_i) \right\|_1 + \left\|\sum_{i\in [k]} (\widehat{w}_i-w_i) \widehat{G}_i \right\|_1 \\ & \leq \left\|\sum_{i\in L}{w_i} (\widehat{G}_i-G_i) \right\|_1 + \left\|\sum_{i\notin L}{w_i} (\widehat{G}_i-G_i) \right\|_1 + \sum_{i\in [k]} |\widehat{w}_i-w_i| \left\|\widehat{G}_i \right\|_1 \\ & \leq 2\sum_{i\in L}{w_i} + \sum_{i\notin L}{w_i} (\varepsilon_i + C\rho_i) + \sum_{i\in [k]} \varepsilon/k \times 1 \\ &\leq 2k \times \frac{8 \log(3k/\delta)}{s} + \left ( \frac {2k\lambda(\mathcal F, \delta/3k)} { s } \right)^{1/\alpha} + C \rho + \varepsilon \\ &\leq \varepsilon+\varepsilon+\varepsilon + C \rho\:, \end{aligned}\] where for the last inequality we used the definition of \(s\) in ([\[s_def\]](#s_def){reference-type="ref" reference="s_def"}). This completes the proof of Lemma [\[somecandidateisclose\]](#somecandidateisclose){reference-type="ref" reference="somecandidateisclose"}.
# Learning Mixtures of Gaussians
Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) are probably the most widely studied mixture classes with numerous applications; yet, the sample complexity of learning this class is not fully understood, especially when the number of dimensions is large. In this section, we will show that our method for learning mixtures can improve the state of the art for learning GMMs in terms of sample complexity. In the following, \(\mathcal{N}_d(\mu, \Sigma)\) denotes a Gaussian density function defined over \(\mathbb{R}^d\), with mean \(\mu\) and covariance matrix \(\Sigma\).
## Mixture of Axis-Aligned Gaussians {#sec:axisaligned}
A Gaussian is called *axis-aligned* if its covariance matrix \(\Sigma\) is diagonal. The class of axis-aligned Gaussian Mixtures is an important special case of GMMs that is thoroughly studied in the literature (e.g. ).
We defer the proof of this result to the appendix. Combining this theorem with Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"} we obtain the following result:
This theorem improves the upper bound of \(O(dk^9\log^2(d/\delta)/\varepsilon^4)\) proved in for spherical Gaussians in the realizable setting. Spherical Gaussians are special cases of axis-aligned Gaussians in which all eigenvalues of the covariance matrix are equal, i.e., \(\Sigma\) is a multiple of the identity matrix. The following minimax lower bound (i.e., worst-case on all instances) on the sample complexity of learning mixtures of spherical Gaussians is proved in the same paper.
Therefore, our upper bound of Theorem [\[axisalignedupperbound\]](#axisalignedupperbound){reference-type="ref" reference="axisalignedupperbound"} is optimal in terms of dependence on \(d\) and \(k\) (up to logarithmic factors) for axis-aligned Gaussians.
## Mixture of General Gaussians
For general Gaussians, we have the following result.
We defer the proof of this result to the appendix. Combining this theorem with Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}, we obtain the following result:
This improves by a factor of \(k^2\) the upper bound of \(O(k^3d^2 \log k / \varepsilon^4)\) in the realizable setting, proved in . Note that Theorem [\[thm:lowerbound\]](#thm:lowerbound){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:lowerbound"} gives a lower bound of \(\Omega(kd/{\epsilon ^ 2})\) for \(m_{\mathcal F^k}(\epsilon,\delta)\), hence the dependence of Theorem [\[gaussianupperbound\]](#gaussianupperbound){reference-type="ref" reference="gaussianupperbound"} on \(k\) is optimal (up to logarithmic factors). However, there is a factor of \(d/\epsilon^2\) between the upper and lower bounds.
# Mixtures of Log-Concave Distributions
A probability density function over \(\mathbb{R}^d\) is log-concave if its logarithm is a concave function. The following result about the sample complexity of learning log-concave distributions is the direct consequence of the recent work of.
Using Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}, we come up with the first result about the sample complexity of learning mixtures of log-concave distributions.
# Conclusions
We studied PAC learning of classes of distributions that are in the form of mixture models, and proposed a generic approach for learning such classes in the cases where we have access to a black box method for learning a single-component distribution. We showed that by going from one component to a mixture model with \(k\) components, the sample complexity is multiplied by a factor of at most \((k\log^2 k)/\epsilon^2\). Furthermore, as a corollary of this general result, we provided upper bounds for the sample complexity of learning GMMs and axis-aligned GMMs---\(O({kd^2\log^2 k}/{\epsilon ^ 4})\) and \(O({kd\log^2 k}/{\epsilon ^ 4})\) respectively. Both of these results improve upon the state of the art in terms of dependence on \(k\) and \(d\). It is worthwhile to note that for the case of GMMs, the dependence of our bound is \(1/ \epsilon^4\). Therefore, proving an upper bound of \(kd^2/\epsilon^2\) remains open. Also, note that our result can be readily applied to the general case of mixtures of the exponential family. Let \(\mathcal{F}_d\) denote the \(d\)-parameter exponential family. Then the VC-dimension of the corresponding Yatrocas class (see Definition [\[def_yatrocas\]](#def_yatrocas){reference-type="ref" reference="def_yatrocas"}) is \(O(d)\) (see Theorem 8.1 in ) and therefore by Theorem [\[thm:distributionVC\]](#thm:distributionVC){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:distributionVC"}, the sample complexity of PAC learning \(\mathcal{F}_d\) is \(O(d/\epsilon^2)\). Finally, applying Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"} gives a sample complexity upper bound of \(\widetilde{O}(k d/ \epsilon^4)\) for learning \(\mathcal{F}_d^k\)
#### Addendum.
After an earlier version of this work was presented in AAAI 2018 (and appeared on arXiv), we obtained improved results for learning mixtures of Gaussians: the class of mixtures of \(k\) axis-aligned Gaussians in \(\mathbb{R}^d\) is agnostic PAC-learnable with sample complexity \(\widetilde{O}(kd/\varepsilon^2)\), and the class of mixtures of \(k\) general Gaussians in \(\mathbb{R}^d\) is agnostic PAC-learnable with sample complexity \(\widetilde{O}(kd^2/\varepsilon^2)\), The proof uses novel techniques, see for details.
[^1]: Total variation distance is a prominent distance measure between distributions. For a discussion on this and other choices see .
[^2]: These VC-dimensions have mainly been studied for the purpose of proving generalization bounds for neural networks with sigmoid activation functions.
[^3]: E.g., consider the case that \(k=2\) and the two components are identical; then there is no way to learn their mixing weights.
[^4]: Note that in some papers, only the case \(C\leq1\) is called agnostic learning, and the case \(C>1\) is called semi-agnostic learning. | {'timestamp': '2018-06-05T02:12:07', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01596', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01596'} |
# Introduction {#sec:intro}
In multi-user communication, the signal received by any user (UE) is a superposition of the desired information and the information intended for other UEs. Transmit beamforming at a base station (BS) plays a pivotal role in focusing the energy of the desired signal and suppressing the multi-user interference to achieve better throughput at UEs. For effective beamforming, the number of UEs usually does not exceed the number of transmit antennas. Using more transmit antennas and thus increasing the dimensionality of beamforming vectors can improve the UEs' throughput with reduced transmit power. However, allocating more transmit power under fixed number of transmit antennas still does not necessarily improve the UEs' throughput. Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) has been introduced to improve the UEs' throughput by allowing UEs with better channel conditions to access and decode the signals, which are intended for the UEs with poorer channel conditions. In other words, the UEs with poorer channel conditions can achieve higher throughput by compromising their information privacy in NOMA. This privacy compromise for the UEs with poor channel conditions is unavoidable in NOMA. Moreover, by restricting all beamforming vectors in the same space, beamforming in NOMA still needs that the dimension of this space, which is equal to the number of transmit antennas, should not be less than the number of UEs to allow the suppression of multiuser interference. It is noteworthy that the UEs with good channel conditions may need only a fraction of the time unit to achieve their needed throughput. Therefore, by serving them only per fractional time, the BS still has the remaining time room to serve the UEs with poor channel conditions. In this way, the information privacy for each UE is preserved because all UEs are allowed to decode their own information only. More importantly, the number of UEs supported at the same fractional time is effectively reduced. Thus, the BS will not need more transmit antennas to suppress the multi-user interference. In this letter, the fractional time allocation to UEs with similar channel conditions and beamforming are enhanced for improving the system's throughput and meeting the UEs' quality-of-service (QoS) in terms of the throughput requirement. This problem is mathematically modelled by a highly nonconvex optimization problem, for which a path-following computational procedure of low complexity is then developed for its computation. Finally, the numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the advantage of the proposed optimization scheme. *Notation.* We use bold upper-case letters for matrices, bold lower-case letters for column vectors, lower-case letters for scalars. \(\Re\{x\}\) denotes the real part of a complex number \(x\). The notation \((\cdot)^{H}\) stands for the Hermitian transpose. \(\mathbf{x}\sim\mathcal{CN}(\boldsymbol{\eta},\boldsymbol{Z})\) means that \(\mathbf{x}\) is a random vector following a complex circular Gaussian distribution with mean \(\boldsymbol{\eta}\) and covariance matrix \(\boldsymbol{Z}\).
# System Model and Problem Formulation {#sec:sys_model}
Consider a multiuser downlink system over a given frequency band with a BS equipped with \(N_t > 1\) antennas in serving \(2K\) single-antenna UEs as illustrated by Fig. [\[fig:Layout\]](#fig:Layout){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Layout"}. There are \(K\) UEs \((1,k)\), \(k=1,\dots K\), which are located in a zone nearer to the BS, called by zone-1, and \(K\) UEs \((2,k)\), \(k=1,\dots, K\), which are located in a zone farer from the BS, called by zone-2. Denote by \(\mathcal{K} \triangleq\{1,2,\dots, K\}\) and \(\mathcal{M}=\{1,2\}\times \mathcal{K}\). Within one time unit, BS uses the fraction time (FT) \(\tau_1:=\tau\;(0 < \tau < 1)\) to serve UEs \((1,k)\) and uses the remaining FT \(\tau_2:=(1-\tau)\) to serve UEs \((2,k)\). The BS deploys a transmit beamformer \(\mathbf{w}_{i,k}\in\mathbb{C}^{N_t\times 1}\) to deliver the information signal \(x_{i,k}\) with \(\mathbb{E}\{|x_{i,k}|^2 \} =1\) to UE \((i,k)\). Let \(\mathbf{h}_{i,k}\in\mathbb{C}^{N_t\times 1}\) be the channel vector from the BS to UE \((i,k)\), which is assumed to follow frequency flat fading with the effects of both large-scale pathloss and small-scale fading counted. The complex baseband signal received by UE \((i,k)\) can be expressed as \[y_{i,k} = \mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,k}x_{i,k} + \sum_{j\in\mathcal{K}\setminus \{k\}}\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,j}x_{i,j} + n_{i,k}\] where the first term is the desired signal, the second term is the multi-user interference, and the third term \(n_{i,k}\sim\mathcal{CN}(0,\sigma^2_{i,k})\) is additive noise. For \(\mathbf{w}_i\triangleq (\mathbf{w}_{i,k})_{k\in{\cal K}}\), the throughput at UE \((i,k)\) is \[{\cal R}_{i,k}\bigl(\mathbf{w}_i,\tau_i \bigr) = \tau_i\ln\Bigl(1+\frac{ |\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,k}|^2}{\sum_{j\in\mathcal{K}\setminus \{k\}}|\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,j}|^2 + \sigma^2_{i,k}}\Bigl)\] which by can be equivalently reformulated by \[\label{frate} {\cal R}_{i,k}\bigl(\mathbf{w}_i,\tau_i \bigr) = \tau_i\ln\Bigl(1+\frac{ (\Re\{\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,k}\})^2}{\sum_{j\in\mathcal{K}\setminus \{k\}}|\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,j}|^2 + \sigma^2_{i,k}}\Bigl)\] under the additional condition \[\label{ad} \Re\{\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,k}\} \geq 0, (i,k)\in {\cal M}.\] The main advantage of this FT-based beamforming scheme is that there is no inter-zone interference in ([\[frate\]](#frate){reference-type="ref" reference="frate"}) that is in contrast with the conventional scheme to concurrently serve all UEs, under which the throughput at UE \((i,k)\) is \[\label{crate} {\cal R}_{i,k}^{'}(\mathbf{w}) = \ln\Bigl(1+ \frac{(\Re\{\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,k}\})^2}{\sum_{(i,j)\in\mathcal{M}\setminus \{(i,k)\}}|\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,j}|^2 + \sigma^2_{i,k}}\Bigl)\] with the full inter-zone interference. Here and in the sequence \(\mathbf{w}\triangleq (\mathbf{w}_1, \mathbf{w}_2)\) and \(\boldsymbol{\tau}\triangleq(\tau_1,\tau_2)\). We are interested in the following problem of jointly designing FT \((\tau_1,\tau_2)\) and the beamformers \((\mathbf{w}_1, \mathbf{w}_2)\) to maximize the system sum throughput (ST):
Here \({\mathsf{\bar R}}_{i,k}\) sets a minimum throughput requirement for UE \((i,k)\) and \(P_{bs}^{\max}\) is a given power budget. Since \({\cal R}_{i,k}(\mathbf{w}_i,\tau_i)\) is a nonconcave function, the optimization problem ([\[eq:SRoptimi\]](#eq:SRoptimi){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SRoptimi"}) is regarded as a highly nonconvex optimization problem, for which finding a feasible point is already computationally difficult. The next section is devoted to a computational path-following procedure for its solution.
# Convex Quadratic-based Path-following method {#sec:CQBI}
The most important step is to provide an effective lower bounding approximation for the function \({\cal R}_{i,k}(\mathbf{w}_i,\tau_i)\) defined by ([\[frate\]](#frate){reference-type="ref" reference="frate"}) to facilitate a path-following computational procedure of the problem ([\[eq:SRoptimi\]](#eq:SRoptimi){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SRoptimi"}). We use the variable changes \(\pmb{\alpha}\triangleq (\alpha_1, \alpha_2)=(1/\tau_1,1/\tau_2)\), which satisfy the following convex constraint: \[\label{eq:changevariables:b} 1/\alpha_1+1/\alpha_2 \leq 1, \alpha_1>0, \alpha_2>0.\] The problem [\[eq:SRoptimi\]](#eq:SRoptimi){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:SRoptimi"} can be equivalently expressed as
At a feasible point \((\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa)})\), define \(x_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}\triangleq \Re\{\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}\}>0\), \(y_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}\triangleq\sum_{j\in\mathcal{K}\setminus \{k\}}|\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,j}^{(\kappa)} |^2 + \sigma^2_{i,k}\), \(d_{i,k}^{(\kappa)} \triangleq (x_{i,k}^{(\kappa)})^2/y_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}>0\), \(a^{(\kappa)}_{i,k}\triangleq 2{\cal R}_{i,k}(\mathbf{w}_i^{(\kappa)},1/\alpha_i^{(\kappa)})+d_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}/\alpha_i^{(\kappa)}(d_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}+1)>0\), \(b^{(\kappa)}_{i,k}\triangleq (d_{i,k}^{(\kappa)})^2/\alpha_i^{(\kappa)}(d_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}+1)>0\), and \(c_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}\triangleq {\cal R}_{i,k}(\mathbf{w}_i^{(\kappa)},1/(\alpha_i^{(\kappa)})^2)>0\). It follows from the inequality [\[inq1\]](#inq1){reference-type="eqref" reference="inq1"} in the appendix that \[{\cal R}_{i,k}(\mathbf{w}_i,1/\alpha_i)\geq {\cal R}_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w}_i,\alpha_i)\] over the trust region
for the concave function \[{\cal R}_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w}_i,\alpha_i)\triangleq a^{(\kappa)}_{i,k}-b^{(\kappa)}_{i,k}\frac{\sum_{j\in\mathcal{K}\setminus \{k\}}|\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,j}|^2 + \sigma^2_{i,k} }{x_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}(2\Re\{\mathbf{h}_{i,k}^H\mathbf{w}_{i,k}\}-x_{i,k}^{(\kappa)})}-c_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}\alpha_i.\] Next, due to the convexity of function \(\|\mathbf{w}_{1}\|^2/\alpha_2\), it is true that \(\|\mathbf{w}_{1}\|^2/\alpha_2\geq 2\Re\{(\mathbf{w}_{1}^{(\kappa)})^H\mathbf{w}_{1}\}/\alpha_2^{(\kappa)}-(\|\mathbf{w}_{1}^{(\kappa)}\|^2/(\alpha_2^{(\kappa)})^2)\alpha_2\). An inner convex approximation of nonconvex constraint [\[eq:SRMequi:d\]](#eq:SRMequi:d){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:SRMequi:d"} is then given by \[\begin{aligned}
\|\mathbf{w}_{1}\|^2 + \|\mathbf{w}_{2}\|^2/\alpha_2-2\Re\{(\mathbf{w}_{1}^{(\kappa)})^H\mathbf{w}_{1}\}/\alpha_2^{(\kappa)}&\nonumber\\ + (\|\mathbf{w}_{1}^{(\kappa)}\|^2/(\alpha_2^{(\kappa)})^2)\alpha_2 &\leq P_{bs}^{\max}.\label{eq:SRMequi:d2} \end{aligned}\] Initialized by a feasible point \((\mathbf{w}^{(0)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(0)})\) for ([\[eq:SRMequi\]](#eq:SRMequi){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SRMequi"}), the following convex quadratic program (QP) is solved at the \(\kappa\)-th iteration to generate the next feasible point \((\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa+1)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa+1)})\): \[\begin{aligned}
\displaystyle\max_{\mathbf{w},\pmb{\alpha}}\ \Phi^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w},\pmb{\alpha})\triangleq \sum_{(i,k)\in{\cal M}}{\cal R}_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w}_i,\alpha_i)\quad{\mathrm{s.t.}}\nonumber\\ {\cal R}_{i,k}^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w}_i,\alpha_i)\geq {\mathsf{\bar R}}_{i,k},\ \forall(i,k) \in\mathcal{M}, (\ref{ad}), \eqref{eq:changevariables:b}, \eqref{eq:Rate1ktrust}, \eqref{eq:SRMequi:d2}. \label{QPproblem} \end{aligned}\] As problem [\[QPproblem\]](#QPproblem){reference-type="eqref" reference="QPproblem"} involves \(m=2(3K+1)\) quadratic and linear constraints, and \(n=2(KN_t + 1)\) real decision variables, its computational complexity is \(\mathcal{O}(n^2m^{2.5}+m^{3.5})\). Note that \(\Phi(\mathbf{w},\pmb{\alpha})\geq \Phi^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w},\pmb{\alpha})\) \(\forall (\mathbf{w},\pmb{\alpha})\), and \(\Phi(\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa)})=\Phi^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa)})\). Moreover, \(\Phi^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa+1)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa+1)})>\Phi^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa)})\) whenever \((\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa+1)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa+1)})\neq (\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa)})\) because the former and the latter, respectively, are the optimal solution and feasible point for ([\[QPproblem\]](#QPproblem){reference-type="ref" reference="QPproblem"}). Therefore, \(\Phi(\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa+1)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa+1)})\geq \Phi^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa+1)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa+1)})>\Phi^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa)})= \Phi(\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa)})\), showing that \((\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa+1)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa+1)})\) is a better feasible point than \((\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa)})\) for ([\[eq:SRMequi\]](#eq:SRMequi){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SRMequi"}). The sequence \(\{(\mathbf{w}^{(\kappa)},\pmb{\alpha}^{(\kappa)})\}\) of improved feasible points for ([\[eq:SRMequi\]](#eq:SRMequi){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SRMequi"}) thus converges at least to a locally optimal solution satisfying the Karush-Kuh-Tucker conditions. We summarize the proposed QP-based path-following procedure in Algorithm [\[alg_SCALE_FW\]](#alg_SCALE_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_SCALE_FW"}.
On average, Algorithm [\[alg_SCALE_FW\]](#alg_SCALE_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_SCALE_FW"} requires about \(10\) iterations for convergence. Fig. [\[fig:SRvsPmax\]](#fig:SRvsPmax){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRvsPmax"} plots the average achievable ST versus the transmit power \(P_{bs}^{\max}\) for \(N_t = 5\). For \(\bar{\mathsf{R}} = 0\) bps/Hz shown in Fig. [\[fig:SRvsPmax\]](#fig:SRvsPmax){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRvsPmax"}(a), one can see that the ST of the proposed FT-based beamforming is higher than that achieved by the other schemes in the high transmit power region. On the other hand, the conventional DL outperforms NOMA and FT+NOMA schemes for high transmit power by making the ST concentrated at those UEs with good channel conditions. Apparently, NOMA does not look efficient when there is no UEs' QoS requirement. In Fig. [\[fig:SRvsPmax\]](#fig:SRvsPmax){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRvsPmax"}(b) with \(\bar{\mathsf{R}} = 1\) bps/Hz, the conventional DL performs worse than NOMA at high \(P_{bs}^{\max}\). The low STs of FT+NOMA-based schemes are probably attributed to the fact that NOMA is more efficient by exploiting their channel differentiation. Increasing \(P_{bs}^{\max}\) leads to a remarkable gain in ST by the proposed FT compared with the other schemes. In addition, the proposed FT is feasible in all range of \(P_{bs}^{\max}\) while the other schemes cannot offer such high QoS to UEs at low \(P_{bs}^{\max}\). The plot of the ST versus QoS requirement threshold \(\bar{\mathsf{R}}\in[0.2,\;1.2]\) bps/Hz is illustrated in Fig. [\[fig:SRvsRth\]](#fig:SRvsRth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRvsRth"}. We can observe that the proposed FT-based beamforming performs quite well and only slightly degrades when \(\bar{\mathsf{R}}\) increases. The performance gap between the proposed FT-based beamforming and other schemes substantially increases by increasing \(\bar{\mathsf{R}}\). It is expected because the proposed FT-based beamforming can tune the power allocation in meeting zone-2 UEs' QoS requirements without causing interference to the zone-1's UEs. Next, we look for the max-min UE throughput optimization problem \[\label{eq:maxminoptimi} \max_{\mathbf{w}, \boldsymbol{\tau}}\min_{(i,k) \in\mathcal{M}}{\cal R}_{i,k}(\mathbf{w}_i,\tau_i)\quad {\mathrm{s.t.}}\quad \eqref{eq:SRoptimi:d}, \eqref{eq:SRoptimi:e}\] which can be addressed similarly by solving the convex program ([\[qosconvex\]](#qosconvex){reference-type="ref" reference="qosconvex"}) (with \(\bar{\mathsf{R}}_{i,k}\equiv 1\)) at each iteration. Fig. [\[fig:MaxminPbs\]](#fig:MaxminPbs){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:MaxminPbs"} plots the average UEs' worst throughput as a function of \(P_{bs}^{\max}\). It shows that the worst throughput achieved by the conventional DL and FT + NOMA-based schemes is saturated once \(P_{bs}^{\max}\) is beyond a threshold. It also reveals that the proposed FT-based beamforming and FT + NOMA in zone-1 achieve worst throughput that is higher than that achieved by others schemes.
# Conclusions {#sec:conclusion}
The paper has proposed a fractional time-based beamforming scheme at a base station to serve two groups of users, which is able to improve the network throughput while preserving the information privacy for the users. Accordingly, a path-following computational procedure for the joint design of fractional times and beamforming vectors to maximize the network throughput has been developed. Extensive simulations have been provided to demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed scheme over the exiting schemes.
# Appendix {#Appendix:A .unnumbered}
For all \(x > 0\), \(\bar{x} > 0\), \(y>0\), \(\bar{y}>0\), \(t>0\), and \(\bar{t}>0\), it is true that \[\begin{aligned}
\displaystyle\frac{\ln(1+x^2/y)}{t}&\geq&\displaystyle a-b\frac{y}{x^2}-ct\label{ing1a}\\ &\geq&\displaystyle a-b\frac{y}{\bar{x}(2x-\bar{x})}-ct\label{inq1} \end{aligned}\] over the trust region \[\label{trust2} 2x-\bar{x}>0,\] where \(a = 2 [\ln(1+d)]/\bar{t} + d/\bar{t}(d+1) > 0, b=d^2/\bar{t}(d+1) > 0,\\ c = [\ln(1+d)]/\bar{t}^2> 0, d=\bar{x}^2/\bar{y}.\) Inequality ([\[ing1a\]](#ing1a){reference-type="ref" reference="ing1a"}) follows from while inequality ([\[inq1\]](#inq1){reference-type="ref" reference="inq1"}) is obtained by using \(x^2\geq \bar{x}(2x-\bar{x})>0\) over the trust region ([\[trust2\]](#trust2){reference-type="ref" reference="trust2"}). | {'timestamp': '2017-08-29T02:09:22', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01771', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01771'} |
null | null |
null | null |
# Introduction {#S1}
In the last decades, various investigations have shown that black hole physics plays a vital role in our understanding of gravity on both macroscopic and microscopic scales. Aspects of black holes such as horizon's global structure, Hawking radiation, thermodynamical properties and black hole information are key concepts related to the fundamental structure of space-time. For recent review see Ref. ( and references therein). Examples of these new concepts and constructions are the Holographic Principle and its realization in AdS/CFT correspondence, Ashtekar approach and loop quantum gravity, Jacobson's thermodynamic formulation as well as Verlinde's ENTOPIC approach to gravity. In general, seeking for new black hole solutions is extremely relevant to set up any relativistic theory of gravity. Recently, a lot of attention has been devoted to the teleparallel equivalent of General Relativity (TEGR). This theory is an equivalent to General Relativity (GR) and can be generalized into a class of theories called \(f(T)\) gravity. TEGR and its generalizations are based on Weitzenböck connection instead of Levi-Civita connection and use a vielbein field, \({e^a}_{\mu}\), as a fundamental field variable, instead of the metric. TEGR is equivalent to GR since its field equations as well as its test particle equation of motion are equivalent to that of GR. In TEGR and its generalizations the gravitational field is represented by torsion instead of curvature because the later vanishes in these theories. TEGR can be constructed as a gauge theory of the translation group, where the vielbein is the gauge field and the torsion is the field strength. This theory is invariant under diffeomorphism and local Lorentz transformations. There is a considerable interest in generalizing TEGR in cosmological through adding higher-torsion terms. These terms can mimic a dark energy fluid in Friedman-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmologies without introducing exotic equations of state. Teleparallel gravity with higher-torsion terms depending only on the torsion scalar, \(T\), are known as \(f(T)\) theories. A part from these cosmological applications some interesting black holes solutions were discovered and studied in the context of \(f(T)\) theories. One of the most studied models of these theories is \(f(T)=T+\beta \,T^2\), where spherically symmetric approximate solution was found and analyzed, furthermore, the higher-torsion correction term was constrained in this theory using the Solar System data. Exact solutions in higher curvature/ torsion theories are not always easy to find also in the framework of \(f(T)\) . Black holes with cosmological constant present some attractive features: for example various horizon topologies appear in contrast to the asymptotically flat case. In these cases, black hole horizons can be spherical, hyperbolic or planar: these features can lead to tori or cylindrical structures depending on the global identifications applied. Asymptotically de Sitter and Anti-de-Sitter charged black holes and rotating black holes in four and higher dimensions have been intensively studied in the context of AdS/CFT and dS/CFT correspondences; see for example Refs.. In this paper, we are going to present new charged asymptotically Anti-de-Sitter black hole solutions with flat horizons in \(f(T)\) theories, where \(f(T)=T+\beta T^2\), \(\beta <0\), and \(D \geq 4\). First of all, these black holes solutions have electric potentials which contains a monopole as well as a quadrupole term. In order to get an asymptotically Anti-de-Sitter (AdS) solution, we are forced to relate the electric monopole momentum and the quadrupole momentum of these solutions, therefore, these two momenta are inseparable. The second interesting feature is that, although this black hole solution is singular at the origin, \(r=0\), its singularity is clearly milder than asymptotically Anti-de-Sitter charged black solution in GR or TEGR. For example in *D* dimensions, the Kretschmann scalar, derived from the Ricci tensor square, and the Ricci scalar are \(K=R_{\mu \nu}R^{\mu \nu} \sim r^{-2(D-2)}\), \(R\sim r^{-(D-2)}\) in contrast with, the known solutions in Einstein-Maxwell theory in both GR and TEGR which have \(K =R_{\mu \nu}R^{\mu \nu}\sim r^{-2D}\) and \(R \sim r^{-D}\). Furthermore, although these asymptotically AdS charged solutions have different \(g_{tt}\) and \(g^{rr}\) component for the metric, they have coinciding Killing and event horizons. The outline of the paper is the following. In Section [2](#S1.1){reference-type="ref" reference="S1.1"}, we briefly review the TEGR formalism through tensors definitions and the field equations, then we introduce the field equations of \(f(T)\) gravity. In Section [3](#S3){reference-type="ref" reference="S3"}, a vielbein field having flat horizon in \(D\) dimensions is applied to the field equations of \(f(T)\) gravity to obtain a general neutral black hole solution in *D* dimensions, which is asymptotically AdS. In Section [4](#S9){reference-type="ref" reference="S9"}, a cylindrically symmetric vielbein is applied to the Einstein-Maxwell field equations in \(f(T)\) gravity. We show how this solution can be reduced to an exact charged static black hole in AdS space. The interesting feature of this black hole is that it has monopole and the quadrupole momenta. This feature extends results presented in. In Section [5](#S5){reference-type="ref" reference="S5"}, some relevant physical features of these black holes are reported. In Section [6](#S11){reference-type="ref" reference="S11"}, we discuss the thermodynamics of the black holes presented in [4](#S9){reference-type="ref" reference="S9"}. Finally, concluding remarks are reported in Section [7](#S12){reference-type="ref" reference="S12"}.
# The TEGR geometry and \(f(T)\) gravity {#S1.1}
TEGR is described by the pair \(\{{\cal M},~e_{i}\}\), with \(\cal M\) being a \(D\)-dimensional manifold and \(e_{i}\) (\(i=1,2,\cdots, D\)) are vectors globally defined on the manifold \(\cal M\). Vector fields \(e_{i}\) are the parallel vectors. In \(D\)-dimension, the parallel vectors are named the *vielbein* fields and the derivative of the contravariant vielbein fields have to vanish \[\label{q1} D_{\mu} {e_i}^\nu:=\partial_{\mu} {e_i}^\nu+{\Gamma^\nu}_{\lambda \mu} {e_i}^\lambda= 0,\] where the differentiation is with respect to the Weitzenböck connection and \(\partial_{\mu}:=\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}}\) and \({\Gamma^\nu}_{\lambda \mu}\) is a non-symmetric affine connection defined as \[\label{q2} {\it {\Gamma^\lambda}_{\mu \nu} := {e_i}^\lambda~ \partial_\nu e^{i}{_{\mu}}}.\] In this geometry, the metric is given by \[\label{q3} {\it g_{\mu \nu} := \eta_{i j} {e^i}_\mu {e^j}_\nu,}\] where \(\eta_{i j}=(+,-,-,-\cdots)\) is *D* dimensional Minkowskian metric. The metricity condition is fulfilled as a consequence of Eq. ([\[q1\]](#q1){reference-type="ref" reference="q1"}). The torsion, \({T^\alpha}_{\mu \nu}\), and the contortion, \(K^{\mu \nu}{}_\alpha\), tensors field are defined as \[\begin{aligned}
\nonumber {T^\alpha}_{\mu \nu} & := & {\Gamma^\alpha}_{\nu \mu}-{\Gamma^\alpha}_{\mu \nu} ={e_i}^\alpha \left(\partial_\mu{e^i}_\nu-\partial_\nu{e^i}_\mu\right),\\ {K^{\mu \nu}}_\alpha & := &-\frac{1}{2}\left({T^{\mu \nu}}_\alpha-{T^{\nu \mu}}_\alpha-{T_\alpha}^{\mu \nu}\right). \label{q4} \end{aligned}\] We introduce the teleparallel torsion scalar of TEGR theory which is \[\label{Tor_sc} T := {T^\alpha}_{\mu \nu} {S_\alpha}^{\mu \nu},\] where the skew symmetric tensor \({S_\alpha}^{\mu \nu}\) is defined as \[\label{q5} {S_\alpha}^{\mu \nu} := \frac{1}{2}\left({K^{\mu\nu}}_\alpha+\delta^\mu_\alpha{T^{\beta \nu}}_\beta-\delta^\nu_\alpha{T^{\beta \mu}}_\beta\right).\] Using Eq. ([\[q4\]](#q4){reference-type="ref" reference="q4"}) it is possible to re-express Eq. ([\[q2\]](#q2){reference-type="ref" reference="q2"}) as \[\label{contortion} {\Gamma^\mu}_{\nu \rho }=\left \{_{\nu \rho}^\mu\right\}+{K^{\mu}}_{\nu \rho},\] where the first term is the Levi-Civita affine connection of GR while the second one is derived from the contortion. It is natural to extend TEGR theory including higher torsion terms defining a Lagrangian \(f(T)\) where \(f\) is a function of the torsion invariant \(T\): \[\label{q7} {\cal L}=\frac{1}{2\kappa}\int |e|(f(T)-2\Lambda)~d^{D}x+\int |e|{\cal L}_{ em}~d^{D}x,\] where \(\kappa\) is a dimensional constant defined as \(\kappa =2(D-3)\Omega_{D-1} G_D\), with \(G_D\) being the Newton gravitational constant in \(D\)-dimensions and \(\Omega_{D-1}\) the volume of \((D-1)\)-dimensional unit sphere given by the expression \(\Omega_{D-1} = \frac{2\pi^{(D-1)/2}}{\Gamma((D-1)/2)}\), with the \(\Gamma\)-function of the argument that depends on the dimension of spacetime[^1]. In Eq. ([\[q7\]](#q7){reference-type="ref" reference="q7"}), \(|e|=\sqrt{-g}=\det\left({e^a}_\mu\right)\) and \({\cal L}_{ em}=-\frac{1}{2}{ F}\wedge ^{\star}{F}\) is the Maxwell Lagrangian, with \(F = dA\), with \(A=A_{\mu}dx^\mu\), is the electromagnetic potential 1-form. The variation of Eq. ([\[q7\]](#q7){reference-type="ref" reference="q7"}) with respect to the vielbein field \({e^i}_\mu\) and the vector potential \(A_{\mu}\) gives the following field equations \[\begin{aligned}
\label{q8} & &{S_\mu}^{\rho \nu} \partial_{\rho} T f_{TT}+\left[e^{-1}{e^i}_\mu\partial_\rho\left(e{e_i}^\alpha {S_\alpha}^{\rho \nu}\right)-{T^\alpha}_{\lambda \mu}{S_\alpha}^{\nu \lambda}\right]f_T-\frac{f-2\Lambda}{4}\delta^\nu_\mu +\frac{1}{2}\kappa{{{\cal T}^{{}^{{}^{^{}{\!\!\!\!\scriptstyle{em}}}}}}}^\nu_\mu=H^\nu{}_\mu \equiv0,\nonumber\\ &&\partial_\nu \left( \sqrt{-g} F^{\mu \nu} \right)=0\; , \end{aligned}\] where \(f := f(T)\), \(f_{T}:=\frac{\partial f(T)}{\partial T}\), \(f_{TT}:=\frac{\partial^2 f(T)}{\partial T^2}\) and \({{{\cal T}^{{}^{{}^{^{}{\!\!\!\!\scriptstyle{em}}}}}}}^\nu_\mu\) is the energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field defined as \[{{{\cal T}^{{}^{{}^{^{}{\!\!\!\!\scriptstyle{em}}}}}}}^\nu_\mu=F_{\mu \alpha}F^{\nu \alpha}-\frac{1}{4} \delta_\mu{}^\nu F_{\alpha \beta}F^{\alpha \beta}.\] Eq. (9) can be re-expressed as \_=e e\^a\_,where \(t^{\nu \mu}\) has the form t\^=.Since \({S}^{a \nu \lambda}\) is a skew-symmetric tensor in the last pairs, then \_\_, [which yields]{.roman} \_. Eq. (12) yields \_V d\^(D-1)x e e\^a\_(t\^0 +T\^\^\^\^\^0 )+ \_.Eq. (13) is the conservation law of the energy-momentum tensor \({{{\cal T}^{{}^{{}^{^{}{\!\!\!\!\scriptstyle{em}}}}}}}^{\lambda \mu}\) and the quantity \(t^{\lambda \mu}\). Thus, we can consider \(t^{\lambda \mu}\) to describe the gravitational energy-momentum tensor in \(f(T)\) gravity. Therefore, the energy-momentum of \(f(T)\) theory contained in a (D-1)-dimensional volume \(V\) takes the form P\^a=\_V d\^(D-1)x e e\^a\_(t\^0 +T\^\^\^\^\^0 )=\_V d\^(D-1)x \_.From Eq. (14), we can return to the standard TEGR as soon as \(f(T)=T\). Eq. (13) represents the conserved four-momentum for any asymptotic flat solution: in this work we discuss a class of asymptotically AdS solution. Therefore, it is natural to calculate conserved quantities relative to a pure AdS space. Otherwise, the conserved quantities is plagued by infinities because of the asymptotic behavior of the asymptotically AdS solution. For example the total mass/energy of an AdS black hole measured by a stationary observer at infinity might be understood as the difference in energy between the AdS black hole solution and AdS space itself. Therefore, in calculating conserved quantities, it is natural to subtract off the contributions coming from pure AdS space in the above conserved quantities of Eq. (13); this is why we have subscript \"\(r\)\" which stands for the regularized value of the physical quantity. \[\frac{d}{dt}\int_V d^{(D-1)}x \ e \ {e^a}_\mu \left(t_{r}^{0 \mu}+{{{\cal T}_{r}^{{}^{{}^{^{}{\!\!\!\!\scriptstyle{em}}}}}}}^{0 \mu}\right)+ \oint_\Sigma \left[e \ {e^a}_\mu \ \left(t_{r}^{j \mu}+{{{\cal T}_{r}^{{}^{{}^{^{}{\!\!\!\!\scriptstyle{em}}}}}}}^{j \mu}\right)\right]=0.\]
# Asymptotically AdS black holes {#S3}
We apply the field equations of extended teleparallel gravity \(f(T)\), Eq. ([\[q8\]](#q8){reference-type="ref" reference="q8"}), to the flat \(D\)-dimensional spacetime horizon, which directly gives rise to the vielbein written in cylindrical coordinate (\(t\), \(r\), \(\phi_1\), \(\phi_2\),\(\cdots\) \(\phi_{D-2}\)) as follows : \[\label{tetrad} \hspace{-0.3cm}\begin{tabular}{l} \(\left({e_{i}}^{\mu}\right)=\left( \sqrt{N(r)}, \; \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_1(r)}}, \; r, \; r, \; r\;\cdots \right)\) \end{tabular}\] where \(N(r)\) and \(N_1(r)\) are two unknown functions of \(r\). Substituting from Eq. ([\[tetrad\]](#tetrad){reference-type="ref" reference="tetrad"}) into Eq. ([\[Tor_sc\]](#Tor_sc){reference-type="ref" reference="Tor_sc"}), we evaluate the torsion scalar as[^2] \[\label{df} T=2(D-2)\frac{N'N_1}{rN}+(D-2)(D-3)\frac{N_1}{r^2}.\] Applying Eq. ([\[tetrad\]](#tetrad){reference-type="ref" reference="tetrad"}) to the field equation ([\[q8\]](#q8){reference-type="ref" reference="q8"}) when \({{{\cal T}^{{}^{{}^{^{}{\!\!\!\!\scriptstyle{em}}}}}}}^\nu_\mu=0\) we get the following non-vanishing components: \[\begin{aligned}
\label{df1} & & H^r{}_r= 2Tf_T+2\Lambda-f=0,\nonumber\\ & & H^{\phi_1}{}_{\phi_1}= H^{\phi_2}{}_{\phi_2}=\cdots \cdots =H^{\phi_{D-2}}{}_{\phi_{D-2}}= \frac{f_{TT} [r^2T+(D-2)(D-3)N_1]T'}{(D-2)r}+\frac{f_T}{2r^2{N}^2}\Biggl\{2r^2NN_1N''\nonumber\\ & &-r^2N_1N'^2+2(2D-5)rNN_1N' +r^2NN'N'_1+2(D-3)N^2[2(D-3)N_1+rN'_1]\Biggr\}-f+2\Lambda=0, \nonumber\\ & & H^t{}_t=\frac{2(D-2)N_1f_{TT} T'}{r}+\frac{(D-2)f_T}{r^2N}\Biggl\{2(D-3)NN_1+rN_1N'+rNN'_1\Biggr\}-f+2\Lambda=0.\nonumber\\ & & \end{aligned}\] Now we are going to find a general solution to the above differential equations using a specific form of \(f(T)\), i.e., \(f(T)=T+\beta T^2\). For this specific form of \(f(T)\), Eqs. ([\[df1\]](#df1){reference-type="ref" reference="df1"}) take the form \[\begin{aligned}
& & H^r{}_r= T+3\beta T^2+2\Lambda=0,\nonumber\\ & & H^{\phi_1}{}_{\phi_1}= H^{\phi_2}{}_{\phi_2}=\cdots \cdots H^{\phi_{D-2}}{}_{\phi_{D-2}}= \frac{2\beta[r^2T+(D-2)(D-3)N_1]T'}{(D-2)r}+\frac{(1+2\beta T)}{2r^2{N}^2}\Biggl\{2r^2NN_1N''\nonumber\\ & &-r^2N_1N'^2+2(2D-5)rNN_1N'+r^2NN'N'_1+2(D-3)N^2[2(D-3)N_1+rN'_1]\Biggr\}-T-\beta T^2+2\Lambda=0,\nonumber\\ & &H^t{}_t= \frac{4(D-2)\beta N_1T'}{r}+\frac{(1+2\beta T)(D-2)}{r^2N}\Biggl\{2(D-3)NN_1+rN_1N'+rNN'_1\Biggr\}-T-\beta T^2+2\Lambda=0.\nonumber\\ && \end{aligned}\] A general \(D\)-dimension solution of Eq. (18) is \[\begin{aligned}
& & N(r)=-\frac{r^2}{6(D-1)(D-2)\beta}-\frac{m}{r^{D-3}}, \qquad \quad N_1(r)=\frac{1}{N(r)}, \nonumber\\ \end{aligned}\] where \(m\) is the mass parameter and we choose \(\Lambda=\frac{1}{24\beta}\) to get a unique solution[^3].
# A new charged AdS black hole solution {#S9}
Using the *D* dimensional spacetime of Eq. ([\[tetrad\]](#tetrad){reference-type="ref" reference="tetrad"}) with a vector potential \(A = V(r) dt\), the field equations have the following non-vanishing components: \[\begin{aligned}
& & H^r{}_r= 2Tf_T+2\Lambda-f+\frac{2V'^2(r)N_1}{N}=0,\nonumber\\ & & H^{\phi_1}{}_{\phi_1}= H^{\phi_2}{}_{\phi_2}=\cdots \cdots =H^{\phi_{D-2}}{}_{\phi_{D-2}}= \frac{f_{TT} [r^2T+(D-2)(D-3)N_1]T'}{(D-2)r}+\frac{f_T}{2r^2{N}^2}\Biggl\{2r^2NN_1N''\nonumber\\ & &-r^2N_1N'^2+4(D-3)^2N^2N_1+2(2D-5)rNN_1N'+r^2NN'N'_1+2(D-3)rN^2N'_1\Biggr\}\nonumber\\ & &-f+2\Lambda-\frac{2V'^2(r)N_1}{N}=0, \nonumber\\ & & H^t{}_t= \frac{2(D-2)N_1f_{TT} T'}{r}+\frac{(D-2)f_T[2(D-3)NN_1+rN_1N'+rNN'_1]}{r^2N}-f+2\Lambda+\frac{2V'^2(r)N_1}{N}=0,\nonumber\\ & & \end{aligned}\] where \(V'=\frac{dV}{dr}\) and as before we set \(\Lambda=\frac{1}{24\beta}\). The general *D*-dimensional solution of the above differential equations takes the form \[\begin{aligned}
& & N(r)=\frac{r^2(D-3)^4c_2{}^4}{(D-1)(D-2)(2D-5)^2c_3{}^2}+\frac{c_1}{r^{D-3}}+\frac{3(D-3)c_2{}^2}{(D-2)r^{2(D-3)}}+\frac{2(D-3)c_2c_3}{(D-2)r^{3D-8}},\nonumber\\ & & N_1(r)=\frac{1}{f(r)N(r)}, \qquad \textrm {where} \qquad f(r)=-\frac{(2D-5)^2c_3{}^2\left[1+\frac{(2D-5)c_3}{c_2(D-3)r^{D-2}}\right]^2}{6\beta (D-3)^4c_2{}^4},\nonumber\\ & & V(r)=\frac{c_2}{r^{D-3}}+\frac{c_3}{r^{2D-5}}.\end{aligned}\] To get an asymptotically AdS or dS solution we have to set \[\begin{aligned}
& & c_3{}^2=\frac{-6(D-3)^4c_2{}^4 \beta}{(2D-5)^2},\end{aligned}\] otherwise the solution have no clear asymptotic behavior. As a result, the monopole momentum is related to the quadrupole momentum of the solution. In this case, one gets \[\begin{aligned}
& &N(r)=\frac{r^2}{6(D-1)(D-2)\left|\beta\right|}-\frac{m}{r^{D-3}}+\frac{3(D-3)q{}^2}{(D-2)r^{2(D-3)}}+\frac{2\sqrt{6\left|\beta\right|}(D-3)^3q{}^3}{(2D-5)(D-2)r^{3D-8}},\nonumber\\ & & N_1(r)= \frac{1}{f(r)N(r)}, \qquad f(r)=\left[1+\frac{(D-3)q\sqrt{6\left|\beta\right|}}{r^{D-2}}\right]^2,\qquad V(r)=\frac{q}{r^{D-3}}+\frac{(D-3)^2q{}^2\sqrt{6\left|\beta\right|}}{(2D-5)r^{2D-5}},\nonumber\\ & &\end{aligned}\] where we set \(c_1=-m\), and \(c_2=q\), which is the monopole momentum. The quadrupole moment is \(Q= \frac{(D-3)^2q{}^2\sqrt{6 \left| \beta \right|}}{(2D-5)}\). As one can notice Eq. (22) tells us that \(\beta\) have a negative value otherwise we get an unphysical solution.\
It is important here to comment on the charged black solutions obtained in. Note that differential equations (20) are different from those derived in from many aspects:\
i) The disappearance of the term \(f(T)\) from Eqs. (5\(\cdot\)`<!-- -->`{=html}13) and (5\(\cdot\)`<!-- -->`{=html}14).\
ii) The terms of the charges in Eqs. (5\(\cdot\)`<!-- -->`{=html}12), (5\(\cdot\)`<!-- -->`{=html}13) and (5\(\cdot\)`<!-- -->`{=html}14) are different from the present Eqs. (20). Furthermore, the solution (23) generalizes the solution in. As it is clear from Eq. (23), the potential \(V(r)\) depends on a monopole and quadrupole momenta and by setting \(q=0\) both momenta vanish and we get a non-charged solution. On the other hand, in, the charged solution depends only on the monopole.
# The main features of the solution {#S5}
Let us now discuss some relevant features of the charged solution presented in the previous Section.\
The metric of the vielbein (23) takes the form ds\^2=dt\^2\
\--r\^2\_i=1\^D-2d\^2_i,\
where \(\Lambda_{ef}= \frac{1}{6(D-1)(D-2)\left|\beta\right|}\). Eq. (23) shows clearly that the metric of the charged solution is asymptotically AdS. Notice that there is no corresponding TEGR solution upon taking the limit \(\beta \rightarrow 0\), which means this charged solution has no analogue in GR or TEGR. By taking the limit \(q \rightarrow 0\), we get the AdS non-charged black holes presented in section ([3](#S3){reference-type="ref" reference="S3"}). Notice that although these asymptotically AdS charged solutions have different \(g_{tt}\) and \(g^{rr}\) component for the metric, they have coinciding Killing and event horizons. [Singularity:]{.ul}\
Here we derive physical singularities by calculating curvature and torsion invariants. Since the function \(f(r)\) could have roots (when \(q<0\)), which we call \(r_n\), one has to consider the behavior of curvature invariants close to these roots. By calculating the Kretschmann scalar as function of the radial coordinate \(r\), we found that the scalar is well behaved. Now calculating the various curvature and torsion invariants, one obtains \[\begin{aligned}
\A \A R^{\mu \nu \lambda \rho}R_{\mu \nu \lambda \rho}= F_1(r)\,\left(\frac{1}{r^{2(D-2)}}\right), \qquad R^{\mu \nu}R_{\mu \nu}= F_2(r)\,\left(\frac{1}{r^{2(D-2)}}\right), \nonu \A \A R= F_3(r)\,\left(\frac{1}{r^{(D-2)}}\right), \qquad T^{\mu \nu \lambda}T_{\mu \nu \lambda} = F_4(r)\, \left(\frac{1}{r^{(D-2)}}\right), \qquad T^\mu T_\mu = F_5(r)\, \left(\frac{1}{r^{(D-2)}}\right), \nonu \A \A T(r)=F_6(r)\, \left(\frac{1}{r^{(D-2)}}\right),\end{aligned}\] where \(R^{\mu \nu \lambda \rho}R_{\mu \nu \lambda \rho}\), \(R^{\mu \nu}R_{\mu \nu }\), \(R\), \(T^{\mu \nu \lambda}T_{\mu \nu \lambda}\) \(T^{\mu }T_{\mu }\) and \(T\) are the Kretschmann scalar, the Ricci tensor square, the Ricci scalar, the torsion tensor square, the torsion square vector and the torsion scalar: \(F_i(r)\) are polynomial functions in \(r\). The above invariants show that:\
a) There is a singularity at \(r=0\) which is a curvature singularity.\
b) In the charged case, the torsion scalar has the form T=,which shows that the scalar torsion has singularity at \(r=0\). Close to \(r=0\), the behavior of the Kretschmann scalar, the Ricci tensor square and the Ricci scalar for the charged solution is given by \(K=R_{\mu \nu}R^{\mu \nu} \sim r^{-2(D-2)}\), \(R=T^{\alpha \beta \gamma}T_{\alpha \beta \gamma}=T^{\alpha}T_{\alpha}=T\sim r^{-(D-2)}\) in contrast with the solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell theory in both GR and TEGR which have \(K =R_{\mu \nu}R^{\mu \nu}\sim r^{-2D}\) and \(R=T^{\alpha \beta \gamma}T_{\alpha \beta \gamma}=T^{\alpha}T_{\alpha}=T \sim r^{-D}\). This shows clearly that the singularity is much milder than the one obtained in GR and TEGR for the charged case. This result raises the question if these singularities are *weak singularities*, according to Tipler and Krolak, and if it is possible to extend geodesics beyond these regions. This topic will be discussed in forthcoming studies. [Energy:]{.ul}\
Let us now calculate the energy related to the charged black holes given by Eqs. (23). Using Eq. (14), it is possible to derive the components of energy in the solution (19). We get: S\^001=. Substituting Eq. (27) into Eq. (14), we get the energy in the form P\^0=E= =, where the value of \(\kappa\) has been used in the second equation of Eq. (28). The value of energy of Eq. (28) is therefore divergent, so we have to use a regularization procedure to obtain a finite value. The regularized expression of Eq. (14) takes the form P\^a:=\_V d\^D-2x -\_V d\^D-2x \_AdS,where *AdS* means calculated for pure Anti-de-Sitter space. Using (30) in solution (19), we get E == ,which is a finite value and clearly shows that the energy is depending on the coefficient of the higher order torsion terms. For the charged solutions given in (21), and by using the same procedure adopted for the non-charged case, we get E=-++O().This shows the contributions of monopole and quadrupole potential energies to the total energy at large distances \(r\). Notice only term depending on \(\beta\) is the quadrupole term. Considering the limit \(r\rightarrow \infty\), we get the total energy measured by a stationary observer at infinity.
# The first law of thermodynamics {#S11}
There is a great deal of work in analyzing the behavior of the horizon thermodynamics in modified theories of gravity. In a wide category of these theories, one gets solutions with horizons and can connect the temperature and entropy with the surface gravity and the area of the outer horizon. Let us now check the validity of the first law of thermodynamics in \(f(T)\) gravity using the charged solution derived above. To investigate the violation of the first law of thermodynamics of the black hole (23), let us follow the analysis performed by Miao et al.. In this work the authors use the Jacobson thermodynamics approach, which has been generalized in, to formulate the first law through rewriting the non-symmetric field equations (9) into symmetric and skew symmetric parts as \[\begin{aligned}
\label{q88} \A \A L_{(\mu\nu)}:=S_{\mu \nu \rho} \partial^{\rho} T f_{TT}+f_T \left[G_{\mu \nu}-\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu \nu}T\right] +\frac{f-2\Lambda}{2}g_{\nu \mu} =\frac{\kappa {{{\cal T}^{{}^{{}^{^{}{\!\!\!\!\scriptstyle{em}}}}}}}^\nu_\mu}{2},\nonu \A \A L_{[\mu \nu]}:=S_{[\mu \nu] \rho} \partial^{\rho} T f_{TT}=0.\end{aligned}\] Assuming an exact Killing vector, they have shown that for a heat flux \(\delta Q\) passing through the black hole horizon, it is Q=\^d\_0+\_H k\^f\_TT T\_,( The authors have shown that the first term in Eq. (33) can be rewritten as \(T\delta S\). Thus, if the second term in Eq. (33) is not vanishing then there will be a violation of the first law of thermodynamics. Miao et al. have explained that the second term in Eq. (34) cannot be equal to zero. Therefore, if we want to satisfy the first law of thermodynamics, we must have either \(f_{TT}=0\) which gives the TEGR (GR) theory, or \(T=constant\). Indeed, AdS black hole solution (19) satisfies the fact that \(T=constant\) and therefore, the first law of thermodynamics of this black hole is satisfied. However, the new charged solution (23) enforces the torsion scalar to be non-trivial, i.e., not constant. Therefore, according to Eq. (33), solution (23) violates the first law of thermodynamics. Explicitly calculating the violation term in (33), it is not vanishing and proportional to the electric charge \(q\). Due to this feature, the first law of thermodynamics is violated.
# Conclusions {#S12}
In this work, we present a new charged solution in Maxwell-\(f(T)\) gravitational theory for any dimension \(D\geq 4\). The exact solution is achieved for \(f(T)=T+\beta T^2\), where \(\beta <0\) and possesses some interesting features. First of all, the solution has a monopole and quadrupole term which are related by requiring the metric is asymptotically AdS. This fact generalizes the result presented in where only the monopole term is present. Secondly, we have studied the singularity of this black hole and have shown that all the invariants constructed from the curvature and torsion have a singularity at \(r=0\). This singularity is milder than the one of a charged black hole in GR and TEGR. The asymptotic behavior of the Kretschmann invariant and the Ricci tensor squared, and the Ricci scalar have the form \(K=R_{\mu \nu}R^{\mu \nu} \sim r^{-2(D-2)}\), \(R\sim r^{-(D-2)}\) in contrast with, the known solutions in Einstein-Maxwell theory in both GR and TEGR. Also the non-charged solution derived in this study, Eq. (19), behaves as \(K =R_{\mu \nu}R^{\mu \nu}\sim r^{-2D}\) and \(R \sim r^{-D}\). Moreover, in spite that the charged black hole has different components of \(g_{tt}\) and \(g^{rr}\), both have a coinciding Killing and event horizons. We have calculated the total energy of the charged solution using the generalization of the energy-momentum tensor and have shown that the resulting form depends on the mass of the black hole. Finally, we have shown that the charged black hole violates the first law of thermodynamics according to the discussion given in. From a genuine physical point of view, these kind of objects can contribute in the debate to establish on what the most reliable representation of gravity is, i.e. the curvature or torsion picture. As discussed in, being GR and TEGR substantially equivalent, the ground of debate should be shifted to \(f(R)\) and \(f(T)\) models since these two theories are substantially inequivalent. As shown in, also fundamental structures like gravitational waves are substantially different in \(f(R)\) and in \(f(T)\) formulations. A deep understanding of black hole features could be of great interest to solve the debate. | {'timestamp': '2017-07-19T02:06:21', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01773', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01773'} |
# Introduction
The study of the structure of the Milky Way galaxy emerges as a key tool in the analysis of the nature of its dark halo and the most massive dwarf galaxies within it, through the manner in which they interact with the visible gas, dust, and stars of the Galactic disk. Astrometric observations at large scales support a cosmology of cold dark matter (CDM) and dark energy, the so-called \(\Lambda\)CDM model , and an "inside-out" formation history of the cosmos and indeed of the Milky Way. At small scales this model predicts many more satellite galaxies in the Milky Way than have been observed . Discoveries of faint Milky Way satellites continue to be made (see, e.g., ), however, and the technical limitations of current observations explain at least some of the mismatch in the numbers of observed and expected satellite galaxies, or subhalos. Nevertheless, questions persist concerning the number, evolution, and mass distribution of Milky Way subhalos (see for a review), as well as their stellar content . Yet more dwarf galaxies could potentially be detected through a search for their tidal imprint on outer gaseous disks , and low-mass subhalos can be destroyed through interactions with the disk : these disjoint ideas argue for the importance of the observational study we effect here, namely, of the vertical structure of the Galactic disk within 2 kpc of the Sun in height and in-plane distance. The hierarchical nature of structure formation, i.e., the ongoing merging of clumps with time, suggests that dark matter could have surviving phase-space structure, which could also be imprinted on the stars. This could occur, e.g., through the formation of stellar streams in the halo. In this paper we are interested in identifying possible traces of halo-disk interactions and thus wish to search for the appearance of stellar number count distributions that break the spatial symmetries expected from the integral of motions embedded in virialized probability distribution functions. To do this we focus on an observational study of that possibility through use of a sample of some 3.6 million K and M dwarfs from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The appearance of asymmetric structures in the Milky Way has been noted through HI gas, dust, and stellar tracers, particularly in association with the warping of the disk . Various scenarios have been proposed for the appearance of warps, though analytic and numerical studies suggest a dynamical origin: warps can appear and disappear through interactions of the disk with the halo and/or the satellites it contains over time scales short with respect to the age of the universe. The stellar disk is more complicated and thus exhibits additional features. Rings , as well as ripples , have been noted, with the latter at distances in excess of 10 kpc from the Galactic center, where the disk is thinning out. In the solar neighborhood vertical asymmetries have been noted in the number counts , as well as in the radial velocities , which have been confirmed by other studies . These asymmetries could be temporally recent as well and be generated by non-axisymmetric features in the disk, such as the spiral arms or galactic bar , or by interactions of the disk with the halo and its embedded satellite galaxies . It is thought that the asymmetries in the number counts are more suggestive of a dynamical origin , although, on the other hand, it appears that the spiral arms possess out-of-plane structure as well . Only two of the Milky Way's satellites are known to be possibly massive enough and close enough to be able to perturb the structure of the dark halo and Galactic disk: the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxy at 20 kpc and the Large Magellanic Cloud at 50 kpc from the Sun . Such massive objects are believed to have formed at late cosmic times . Numerical simulations of the tidal interactions of the satellites reveal significant vertical perturbations of the disk . However, simulations of such effects do not yield the precise vertical asymmetries observed in the existing data . In this paper we revisit and expand the earlier studies of and to scrutinize the vertical structure of the Galactic disk and its variation across the Galactic plane. We use a larger stellar photometric sample to subdivide the disk of the Milky Way within \(|z| < 2\) kpc in vertical distance from the Galactic plane into bins of longitude \(l\) and latitude \(b\) to explore the extent to which the large-scale asymmetries persist to smaller scales. We show that these asymmetries are more pronounced toward the Galactic anticenter, and we find similarities to the ripples seen at further distances from the Sun by and. We provide quantitative locations and amplitudes of these asymmetries so that those who model Milky Way structure can compare with them; associated with these features are changes in the disk scale heights, north and south---we report these as well. Interestingly, numerical simulations of the tidal interactions of the disk-satellite-halo system reveal an induced spiral arm and barred structure in the Galactic disk . This also motivates our observational study, and we compare the variations we do observe with the known spiral arm structure of the Galactic disk . Our studies are also pertinent to the long-standing problem of the determination of the matter density in the vicinity of the Sun , as inferred from the measured kinematics of the local stars . In this so-called Oort problem, an assumed gravitationally relaxed population of stars is used to trace the local gravitational potential and to infer the local matter and dark matter densities, where we note and for reviews. The appearance of vertical oscillations in the stellar number counts and velocity distributions of the Milky Way suggests that the local stars may not be sufficiently gravitationally relaxed, incurring additional uncertainty in the assessment of the local dark matter density , a parameter key to current efforts to detect dark matter directly . We believe that further observational study and analysis, as we help realize in this paper, will be able to resolve the origin of the vertical asymmetries and ultimately that of their impact on the assessment of the local dark matter density. Further studies with *Gaia* will also be key . The SDSS is a mature observational platform that gives us access to a very large photometric sample of stars, observed with the same telescope under carefully calibrated conditions. The uniformity of the photometric calibration is ensured through multiple observations of the same stars, rendering it nearly free of astrophysical assumptions . The SDSS is the first survey to provide significant coverage in the south, allowing us to study and compare regions in both the north and the south. We study red, main-sequence stars, particularly K and M dwarfs, because main-sequence stars vary little in their intrinsic luminosity for a given color and metallicity, and the population of faint red stars is less likely to be infiltrated by non-main-sequence stars, such as giants. Our largest analysis sample contains 3.6 million of such stars. By breaking the sky into regions, we study the vertical structure of the Galaxy and search for changes across the footprint. We use Galactic longitude and latitude with the Sun at the center such that the longitude is measured counterclockwise from the line toward the Galactic center and latitude is measured from the plane of the Galactic equator such that positive latitude is north, noting the standard transformation from equatorial to Galactic coordinates . As in and, we study the vertical symmetry of the Galactic disk by comparing the number of stars observed north and south. For continuity and simplicity we follow and in our modelling of the vertical structure of the disk. That is, we modify the solution of for the vertical structure of an axially symmetric thin disk to give a parameterization of the stellar density that has both a thin disk and a thick disk, as inferred from observations . Apparently, the two disks have distinct metallicities and scale lengths , though we refer the reader to for further discussion; we do not include these refinements, however, in our analysis. We probe the local structure of the stellar disk by determining the parameters of our model across the footprint, or, specifically, as we change the chosen range of longitude for fixed latitude. In this paper we not only compare the structure, north and south, with longitude, across the footprint, but we also exploit the complete northern coverage of the SDSS to determine (i) the rate at which the mass in the stars changes with distance from the Galactic center, to compare with galactic models, and (ii) how changing the selected latitude interval for a fixed longitude interval impacts the shape of the vertical stellar number count distribution. If there were no change in vertical structure across the Galactic plane and if the vertical metallicity distribution were uniform, then the shape of the vertical distribution in number counts would not change when the latitude window is changed, once corrections are made for the geometric acceptance. We do, however, observe definite changes in shape; consequently, we have a photometric proxy for changes in in-plane structure and/or metallicity. We believe that such studies can be refined and sharpened with further observations from the *Gaia* mission , and not only through more photometric observations, because many more spectra will also become available. Spectral information makes it possible to measure the vertical gradient in metallicity , and further studies with better resolution across the Galactic plane should help reveal the specific origin of the shape differences. We begin by discussing our data selection and consider the various systematic effects that must be understood to determine the vertical distribution of stellar counts. We then turn to a discussion of our fitting procedure before presenting the results of our north-south combined analysis and north-only analysis.
# Data Selection and Photometric Distance Assessment {#photod}
This study uses data from the SDSS DR9 , the Ninth Data Release of the SDSS, which was also used in and. As in our earlier papers, the errors are predominantly systematic and derive from the use of a photometric "parallax" relation to relate the color of a main-sequence star to its intrinsic luminosity and thus to determine its distance. Particular sources of error include those associated with stellar identification, as well as possible inadequacies in the application of corrections for reddening and absorption due to dust. The first source of error includes not only the possible confusion of dwarfs with giants, or the appearance of unresolved binaries, but also the possibility of admixtures of stellar populations of varying age and metallicity. We refer to for an extended discussion and for tests of our corrections for dust effects. We follow the procedures described in and now summarize them briefly. To minimize dust effects, we analyze data only above \(30^\circ\) in absolute latitude, and we correct the data for the reddening and absorption due to dust by using the maps of. In selecting the stars for our analysis, we require \(15 < r_0 < 21.5\), where \(r_0\) is the apparent brightness of the star, and \(1.8 < (g-i)_{0} < 2.4\). Note that \(g-i\) is the color defined as the ratio of the intensities of the \(g\)-band and the \(i\)-band, which are parts of a five-band survey where each band is associated with a range of frequencies, whereas \((g-i)_0\) is the color once the effect of reddening from dust has been removed. For our selection of \(|b| > 30^\circ\), the color excess \(E(B-V)\) is typically less than 0.03 mag. This translates to a color correction in \(g-r\) of about 0.03 mag, and an error on that correction of much less than that amount. Recall that a color error of 0.01 mag corresponds to a distance error of \(< 5\%\) and that the typical SDSS photometric color errors are about 0.02 mag for fainter stars. The majority of stars in our data selection are K-and M-type main-sequence stars, which are the reddest and coldest. They make up the majority of the main sequence, with M-type stars being the most prevalent. By using the reddest stars, we reduce the possibility of pollution from non-main-sequence stars. However, it is still possible for giants to infiltrate the sample. Figure [\[fig:giants\]](#fig:giants){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:giants"} shows the results of a photometric test for the presence of giants. This plot analyzes stars with \(14.9 < r_0 < 15.4\) in a region of the sky where giants are expected to occur; we thus expect our test sample to have a much greater proportion of giants than our analysis sample. We have found the number of giants in our photometric test sample to be a very small fraction of the total number of stars and thus conclude that the giant admixture in our data set is trivially small. In order to determine the distance to each of our selected stars, we use the photometric parallax relations devised by for \((r-i)_{0}\) color and by for \((g-i)_{0}\) color, along with the refinements of from fits to globular clusters for the red stars we consider here---we refer the reader to for a detailed discussion and comparison with. The photometric parallax method determines the distance to a star from its apparent brightness and its intrinsic brightness---the latter is inferred from its color and metallicity. The relation we have used in \((r-i)_{0}\) color for the absolute magnitude \(M_{r}\) is that of but also includes a metallicity correction \(\Delta M_r\): \[\begin{aligned}
M_r &=& \Delta M_r ([\hbox{Fe/H}]) + 3.2 + 13.30(r-i)_0 \nonumber \\ &&-11.50(r-i)_0^2+5.40(r-i)_0^3-0.70(r-i)_0^4 \,, \label{pprmi0} \end{aligned}\] with \(\Delta M_r ([\hbox{Fe/H}])=-1.11 [\hbox{Fe/H}]-0.18 [\hbox{Fe/H}]^2\). We have taken \([\hbox{Fe/H}]\) to be \(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.3 universally because we are unable to use the photometric metallicity assessment of due to the absence of sufficiently precise \(u\)-band information for the faint, red stars we consider in this paper. Moreover, for calibration purposes, only the stellar clusters M67 and NGC 2420 are sufficiently red and out of the Galactic plane , and their metallicities are much larger than expected for thick-disk stars. (In Section [3.3](#Nonlyscale){reference-type="ref" reference="Nonlyscale"} we report evidence for decreasing metallicity in the K/M dwarfs as we sample them well above the Galactic plane.) A similar color-magnitude equation, adapted from, has been used in \((g-i)_{0}\) color: \[\begin{aligned}
M_r &=& \Delta M_r ([\hbox{Fe/H}]) -0.50 + 14.32(g-i)_0 \nonumber \\ &&-12.97(g-i)_0^2+6.127(g-i)_0^3-1.267(g-i)_0^4+0.0967(g-i)_0^5 \,, \label{ppgmi0} \end{aligned}\] with the same metallicity correction. Using the intrinsic brightness \(M_r\) and the apparent brightness \(r_0\) in magnitudes, we calculate the distance \(d[r_0,M_r]\) in kiloparsecs using the relation \(r_0-M_r =-5 + 5 \log_{10} d[r_0,M_r]\). We refine these distances using the analysis of, so that, for \((r-i)_0\) color, the distance \(d\) is finally determined to be \[d = d[r_0, M_r( (r-i)_0,[{\rm Fe/H}])] + 0.1415 (r-i)_0 + 0.0436 \,, \label{drmi0tune}\] whereas in \((g-i)_0\) color, it is \[d = d[r_0, M_r( (g-i)_0,[{\rm Fe/H}])] + 0.08982 (g-i)_0-0.0726 \. \label{dgmi0tune}\] For the faint, red stars we analyze in this paper the color-color diagram, as shown in Figure 14 of, in \((r-i)_0\) versus \((g-i)_0\) shows a tight correlation. We thus expect the two photometric parallax relations to work comparably well, and this is borne out by both our findings and those of previous studies. The color precision of the SDSS photometry (\(\pm 0.02\) mag) leads to typically \(\pm 0.2\) mag precision in \(M_r\) and thus \(\pm 10\%\) distance errors . This assumes that the assigned metallicity is correct. If an incorrect metallicity were used, then the distance errors would be larger. Supposing, as usual, that the stars close to the plane (thin disk) have an \[Fe/H\] metallicity of \(-0.3\), but the stars far from the plane (thick disk) have an \[Fe/H\] metallicity of \(-0.8\), then one has an additional error of up to \(+0.4\) mag (-20% in distance) for a full mismatch of \(\Delta {\rm [Fe/H]} =-0.5\) . We thus expect the reported distances to become gradually too large as the population shifts from mostly thin-disk stars at \(|z| < 0.5\) kpc to that of mostly thick-disk stars at \(|z| > 1.5\) kpc because the distances have been overestimated by 10%-20% as a consequence of our metallicity assumption. In this paper we consider a sample of stars several times larger than those analyzed previously, to the end of discerning and interpreting variations in the stellar number distributions across the footprint. As a result, in the current analysis, systematic errors associated with the possible inadequacy of the dust corrections for reddening and extinction across the sky, as well as with any nonuniformity in the photometric calibration itself, become potentially pertinent and need to be considered. We now address each of these effects in turn. We have used the dust maps of to assess the effects of dust; they are constructed from observations of dust emission in the far infrared after correcting for its temperature. Photometric and spectroscopic tests have shown these maps to be accurate for the higher-latitude (\(|b| > 30^\circ\)) sightlines we employ in our study, though this work has also revealed, working in \((g-r)_0\) color and averaging over large angular scales, that the stars in the south are redder than those in the north. Quantitatively the two assessments are not the same (note Table 5 in ), with the photometric assessment using blue-tip stars being larger, yielding a result of 21.8 mmag redder in the south rather than \(8.8\pm1.5\) mmag. We believe that the common reddening difference is better attributed to an inadequacy in the calibration of the \(g_0\)-band magnitude in the south, rather than to one in the dust reddening correction per se , though metallicity variations in the photometric sample can appear as well. Indeed suggests that the blue-tip population could be fundamentally different in the north, due to age and metallicity differences. Subsequent work on different fronts supports this view. Photometric studies with Pan-STARRS1 of stellar reddening under assumptions of variation in stellar metallicity and population across the Galactic disk have recently been employed to construct an independent dust map, based on dust absorption ; these maps agree closely with the older emission-based maps if compared out of the Galactic plane . using Pan-STARRS1 data, and its claimed stability of \((20, 10, 10, 10, 20)\) mmag in \(ugriz\) bands has been confirmed in the northern hemisphere by. Additionally, they note small differences in the median magnitudes of Pan-STARRS1 and SDSS data, north and south, of less than \(\pm10\, {\rm mmag}\) in the rms for \(|b|>20^\circ\) and \(griz\) colors. Were these shifts uniform over smaller angular scales, then they would be of little relevance. However, their maps of the differences between Pan-STARRS1 and SDSS data reveal that they can differ up to \(\pm 40\) mmag over \(15'\) pixels. Nevertheless, the shifts in \((r-i)\) color are smaller than those in \((g-i)\) color, even in localized regions . Thus we think that if our conclusions are insensitive to the choice of the photometric parallax scheme then they should also be robust with respect to a refinement of the photometric calibration. Nevertheless, in later sections we consider how the errors we discuss compare to the size of the effects we discover.
# Functional Fits
A geometric selection function is used in order to correct for geometric effects and to calculate a stellar density. The selection function determines the effective volume for each bin of observed stars in height \(z\) from the Galactic plane. Each bin is divided by the associated selection function to determine the number density at that \(z\). The selection function is \[{\cal V}(z) = \frac{1}{2} \delta (l_2-l_1) z^2 \left(\frac{1}{\sin^2 b_1}-\frac{1}{\sin^2 b_2} \right) \,, \label{selection}\] where \(\delta\) is the width of the bin in kpc and \(z\) is in the middle of the bin and is given in kpc. Note that \(l_1 < l <l_2\), \(b_1 < |b| <b_2\), and both quantities are in radians. The coordinates \[x =-8 + d \cos b \cos l \quad;\quad y = d \cos b \sin l \quad;\quad z = d \sin b\] are all measured from the Galactic center with the convention that the Sun is located at (-8, 0, 0) kpc in this coordinate system. We define distances from the Sun in the Galactic plane as \(\Delta x\) and \(\Delta y\). Figure [\[fig:selectionfunction\]](#fig:selectionfunction){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:selectionfunction"} shows a plot of \(z\) versus \(\Delta x\) or \(\Delta y\), demonstrating how different slices in latitude and \(z\) yield a different projected area on the \(z-x\) or \(z-y\) plane and impact the volume \({\cal V}(z)\), Slices of different width in longitude also affect \({\cal V}(z)\), but the specific longitudes themselves do not. The stellar densities \(n(z)\equiv n_{\rm raw}(z)/{\cal V}(z)\) are then plotted and fit to the thin-and thick-disk model of, a modification of the model of that adds a second disk: \[n(z)=n_0 \left({\rm sech}^2\left(\frac{(z+z_{\odot})}{2H_1}\right) + f {\rm sech}^2\left(\frac{(z+z_{\odot})}{2H_2}\right) \right) \,, \label{fit}\] where \(n_0\) is a normalization factor, \(H_1\) is the scale height of the thin disk, \(H_2\) is the scale height of the thick disk, and \(f\) is the fraction of the stellar population that belongs to the thick disk. The parameter \(z_{\odot}\) is the height of the Sun above the Galactic plane, though we emphasize that \(z_\odot\) does not correspond to a point-to-point distance because the Galactic plane is a locally determined quantity: the Galactic disk need not be perfectly flat. Our model assumes a two-disk structure that is north-south-symmetric with respect to the Galactic plane. Due to brightness saturation effects, we analyze only those stars that possess a vertical height \(|z| > 0.35\,{\rm kpc}\) from the Galactic plane. Thus we believe that we are considering a mix of thin-and thick-disk stars across the SDSS footprint. It is pertinent to compare our choice with other recent models of the structure of the Galactic disk. The recent work of and, for example, also supports the use of a \({\rm sech}^2\) vertical distribution for thick-disk stars in the Milky Way, though the thin-disk model of employs Einasto ellipsoids (generalized exponentials). In addition, the study of suggests, rather, that the vertical distribution of stars in galaxies with a merger history might be better described by a \({\rm sech}^1\) distribution. Since our particular purpose is to study the appearance of north-south (N/S) symmetry breaking across the Galactic plane, we believe that our conclusions do not rely on the particular N/S symmetric parameterization of the vertical distributions that we use. If the stellar disk is flat over small variations in \(x\) and \(y\), rather than merely flat on average, then one can expect \(z_\odot\) to be universal for all lines of sight. However, if the stellar disk has local warps or ripples, then the determined \(z_\odot\) need not be universal, and can serve as a proxy for such local variability. Thus variations in the determination of \(z_{\odot}\) in the context of a fit to a distribution that is N/S symmetric probe how well one can meaningfully define the Galactic "plane." To fit Eq. ([\[fit\]](#fit){reference-type="ref" reference="fit"}) to the vertical distribution of star counts, we optimize \(\chi^2\), namely, \[\chi^2 = \sum_{i=1}^{N_{\rm bin}} \left( \frac{\left( N_i-n(z_i) \right)}{\sigma_i} \right)^2\,,\] over \(N_{\rm bin}\) bins, where \(N_i\) stars are in bin \(i\) centered on a height \(z_i\) and \(n(z_i)\) is the theoretical model of Eq. ([\[fit\]](#fit){reference-type="ref" reference="fit"}). The weights \(\sigma_i\) are given by \(\sqrt{N_i}\) of \(N_i\) stars. We use a combination of C and Python and the fitting routines of ROOT [^1], a powerful data analysis framework. At low \(z\), the selection function becomes ineffective if the stars cannot be seen because they are too bright. A minimum \(z\) cut is employed to remove this effect. This cut was determined for each data selection by fitting the model with trial cuts and minimizing the \(\chi^2/{\rm dof}\) of the fit; we have determined that a minimum \(z\) cut of \(\lvert z \rvert>0.35\,{\rm kpc}\) can be used for all our fits. Thus far we have addressed the vertical structure of the disk exclusively. However, in certain stellar data sets, the variation in in-plane radial distance \(R\), noting \(R\equiv\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}\), can exceed 1.5 kpc. To investigate the consequences of such variations, we also employ fits in which we bin our data set in \(R\) as well and scale out the \(R\) variation, noting a similar procedure in, by modifying the selection function of Eq. ([\[selection\]](#selection){reference-type="ref" reference="selection"}) to include the factor \[\exp((R-R_0)/(2.7 {\rm kpc})) \,, \label{selectionR}\] where \(R_0 = 8\,{\rm kpc}\) and \(2.7\, {\rm kpc}\) is the central value of the radial scale length (with an uncertainty of 4%) found by. That is, after binning the data in \(R\) and \(z\), where \(R_i\) is the coordinate at the center of a bin in \(R\), we construct \[n_{\rm eff}(z) = \sum_{i} n_{\rm raw}(z,R_i) \exp((R_i-R_0)/(2.7\,{\rm kpc}))\,,\] after summing over all over bins in \(R\) for fixed \(z\), and then compute \(n(z)=n_{\rm eff}(z)/{\cal V}(z)\). As the result of this procedure we end up with larger relative errors in \(n(z)\), though we find no indications that such an analysis is warranted. We find that using \(n_{\rm eff}(z)\) in place of \(n(z)\) does not affect our extracted parameters in a significant way and thus does not affect our conclusions. Thus in what follows, we do not employ a simultaneous analysis in \(R\) and \(\phi\) outright, but rather bin our data in the vertical coordinate using the selection function of Eq. ([\[selection\]](#selection){reference-type="ref" reference="selection"}) to determine \(n(z)\).
## North and South Combined Analysis {#NScomb}
We begin by studying regions selected such that the north and south have completely matched coverage. The first selection has been designed for uniformity by selecting stars with Galactic coordinates in \(70^\circ < l < 165^\circ\) and \(51^\circ < |b| <65^\circ\), which are then analyzed in longitude increments of \(5^\circ\), \(10^\circ\), or \(15^\circ\) so that each selection has roughly the same number of stars (Figure [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(a)). This uniform latitude cut creates a sample that can be directly compared as a function of longitude without the added complication of changing latitude. The second selection has been made to maximize the number of stars included in the analysis, by dividing the sample into regions that cover \(5^\circ\), \(10^\circ\), or \(15^\circ\) of longitude, and choosing the maximum range in latitude possible in each wedge while maintaining complete coverage in the north and south (Figure [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(b)). The \(R\) and \(\phi\) distributions of the \((l,b)\) wedges in Figure [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(b), for the particular range of colors \(1.8 < (g-i)_0 < 2.4\) that we analyze, are shown in Figure [\[fig:polarplot\]](#fig:polarplot){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:polarplot"}. Using the previously discussed cuts and selections, we apply the selection function in Eq.([\[selection\]](#selection){reference-type="ref" reference="selection"}) and employ the fitting function of Eq. ([\[fit\]](#fit){reference-type="ref" reference="fit"}) with the photometric parallax method in \((g-i)_0\) color as described in Section [2](#photod){reference-type="ref" reference="photod"} to determine the distance to each star. We require \(0.35\,{\rm kpc} \le z \le 2.0\,{\rm kpc}\), where the maximum value of \(z\) is determined by color completeness . We first analyzed the region shown in Figure [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(a) to determine what variations occur when changing the selected longitude range and then repeated our analysis with the expanded latitude sample of Figure [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(b). There are 1.05 and 3.59 million stars in total in the selections of Figures [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(a) and [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(b), respectively. The changes in Galactic parameters for the two sets are sufficiently small that we have shown the stellar density profiles for the expanded latitude selections in Figure [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(b). Figure [\[fig:histogramsmatchedset\]](#fig:histogramsmatchedset){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:histogramsmatchedset"} shows the results, displaying the stellar number density as a function of vertical distance. We find the quality of fit (\(\chi^2/{\rm dof}\)) to range from 1.4 to 2 for the fits shown. Although the vertical stellar distribution is grossly smooth and symmetric, the plots do show a definite north-south asymmetry of \({\cal O}(10\%)\) in the stellar number counts, with the effect becoming more marked at larger \(l\), as noticed in, though the expanded latitude data set is four times larger. The wave-like nature of the departures from the north-south-symmetric fit argues against either metallicity variations or a failure of the north-south photometric calibration in explaining this result; indeed the possible sizes of such effects are too small to have an impact. We discuss the residuals, north and south, in Section [3.2](#cfNS){reference-type="ref" reference="cfNS"}. We note that the quality of fit is poorest in regions where the observed wave-like nature of the N/S asymmetry is most prominent. In the remainder of this section we consider the changes in the Galactic parameters across the regions described in Figures [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(a) and (b), to provide a context for our analysis of the N/S variations. Figures [\[fig:zsun\]](#fig:zsun){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:zsun"}, [\[fig:matchedthinthick\]](#fig:matchedthinthick){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:matchedthinthick"}(a), and [\[fig:matchedthinthick\]](#fig:matchedthinthick){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:matchedthinthick"}(b) show the fit parameters \(z_{\odot}\), thin-disk thickness, and thick-disk thickness, respectively, as functions of longitude. Our analysis shows only modest variation in \(z_{\odot}\) across the footprint, both for the selections with a uniform latitude-cut (which we henceforth refer to as "uniform") and for the expanded latitude selections (which we henceforth refer to as "expanded"). The average \(z_\odot\) values obtained for the uniform and expanded analyses, respectively, are \(z_{\odot} = 14.9 \pm 0.5\) pc and \(z_{\odot} = 15.3 \pm 0.4\) pc. The average for the uniform analysis is consistent with the value of \(z_{\odot} = 14.3 \pm 0.6\) pc found by. Fitting the expanded results with a straight line reveals a \(\chi ^2/{\rm dof}\) of 3.53, so that there appears to be a genuine variation with longitude. However, there is little difference in the average if the uniform or expanded latitude selection is employed. Our values for \(z_\odot\) are about 2\(\sigma\) lower than the recent literature using similar stars, noting \(z_\odot \sim 25\) pc and \(z_\odot = 27.5 \pm 6 \rm pc\) . Other determinations of \(z_\odot\), such as the value of \(26 \pm 3\) pc found in a study of Cepheid variables , or that of , using younger population tracers, with values ranging from 6 to 20 pc, differ from these results and support the existence of the "environmental" sensitivity we have found (see also ). Figure [\[fig:matchedthinthick\]](#fig:matchedthinthick){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:matchedthinthick"} shows the analogous results for the disk thicknesses. The differences between the averages for uniform and expanded thickness are small, particularly for the thin disk, which is most pertinent to the north-south asymmetry seen in Figure [\[fig:histogramsmatchedset\]](#fig:histogramsmatchedset){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:histogramsmatchedset"}, as will become clear in Section [3.2](#cfNS){reference-type="ref" reference="cfNS"}. Recall, too, that the errors in photometric distances are at least \(\pm 10\%\). The evidence for variations with \(l\) is also weaker than in the case of \(z_\odot\), though a change in the vertical scale height farther from the Galactic center---and hence at larger \(l\)---is expected . Sensitivity to such variations is evidently limited by our statistics, so that we will return to this point in our north-only analysis, for which we have a vastly larger number of stars. Although other analyses have revealed a range in the value of \(z_\odot\), determined from stars of differing spectral class in differing regions of the sky, our analysis is the first to reveal variations in its value across the Galactic plane with stars of the same spectral class. Barring the existence of significant in-plane metallicity gradients, which would be at odds with the results of existing observational studies , we believe the variations we have found speak to a Galactic disk that possesses ripples and thus is not globally flat. We have confirmed that this feature, and indeed all the features we have found thus far, also appear in our analyses using photometric parallax with \((r-i)_0\) color. We note, moreover, that a positive warp in the north, toward \(l\sim 90^\circ\), has also been observed , though this does not explain the variations in \(z_\odot\) that we have observed. The ripples could potentially arise from tidal effects on the disk, which appear in numerical simulations of disk-satellite encounters . However, it is also important to compare our results with known in-plane features that vary across the SDSS footprint, and thus we consider the Milky Way's spiral arm structure. The dust obscuring the Milky Way's disk has limited our ability to study its spiral arms. Questions persist as to their nature and origin , as well as to their precise structure . The absence of bright, massive \(^{13}\)CO clouds in the interarm space promotes the association of these apparently short-lived features with the spiral arms themselves. As a result, young, red embedded clusters of stars should act as tracers of the spiral arms . have challenged the notion of spiral arms as in-plane structures with north-south-symmetric vertical extent , revealing embedded clusters with locations extending both above and below the plane. These authors also note that cluster formation can be associated with the halo as well . Nevertheless, it is possible that the variations in \(z_{\odot}\) are related to an out-of-plane structure of the spiral arms. Figure [\[fig:polarplot\]](#fig:polarplot){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:polarplot"} shows the spiral arm structure detailed in overlaid on the analysis sample of Figure [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(b) plotted in Galactocentric coordinates \(R,\phi\), and the analyzed wedges in longitude have been marked with a \(+\) in regions where the value of \(z_{\odot}\) is greater than the global average and with a \(-\) in regions where it is less than the global average. While the work of shows evidence for some parts of the Milky Way's stellar spiral arms being located a few hundred parsecs above or below the Galactic plane, we do not see any correlation between these out-of-plane stellar spiral arms and variations in \(z_\odot\) with \(l\) or any correlation with regions of the Galactic plane where significant north-south asymmetries are apparent at \(|z| > 0.35\) kpc.
## North and South Comparative Analysis {#cfNS}
We now turn to a detailed analysis of the north-south differences shown in Figure [\[fig:histogramsmatchedset\]](#fig:histogramsmatchedset){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:histogramsmatchedset"}. Working in a coordinate system with the Galactic plane as its origin (by shifting \(z\) so that \(z\rightarrow z +z_\odot\)), we show residuals calculated as (data-model)/model as a function of vertical distance in Figure [\[fig:residualoverlays\]](#fig:residualoverlays){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:residualoverlays"}. We overlay the residual in the north and that in the south in each region of Figure [\[fig:histogramsmatchedset\]](#fig:histogramsmatchedset){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:histogramsmatchedset"} using the parameters of its fit. This visualizes the north-south asymmetry of Figure [\[fig:histogramsmatchedset\]](#fig:histogramsmatchedset){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:histogramsmatchedset"} and confirms the earlier results of and. The residuals have wave-like features that grow in amplitude and vertical extent with increasing longitude, refining and extending what was observed by. Interestingly, at low \(z\) the south always has a positive residual, whereas the north always has a negative residual. Note that although the figures go out to 2.5 kpc, the fits themselves only extend to 2 kpc. Repeating this analysis on regions with uniform latitude reveals the same pattern; the changes due to latitude are small compared to the effects seen in the figure. The data set with the expanded latitude selection is used here because it allows for a larger range in longitude and better statistics. We find that similar results emerge when we repeat our analysis using distances computed using \((r-i)_0\) color.
Given the visual differences between the north and the south shown in Figure [\[fig:residualoverlays\]](#fig:residualoverlays){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:residualoverlays"}, a quantitative comparison has been made by performing fits on the north and south independently. We employ the same thin-and thick-disk model but for one modification. The original model had difficulties fitting stars that are only in the north or only in the south; this is solved by fixing the value of \(z_{\odot}\) ---the other parameter values are determined by fitting. We use a \(z_{\odot}\) of \(14.3\,{\rm pc}\), the average value obtained by, though our results are not sensitive to that particular choice. The results of these fits are shown in Figure [\[fig:thinthicknorthsouth\]](#fig:thinthicknorthsouth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:thinthicknorthsouth"}, which shows the thicknesses of the thin and thick disks as functions of longitude. In these fits we found it pertinent to employ the uniform sample of Figure [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(a) in order to focus on the possibility of longitudinal variations in a crisp way. Separate fits to the northern and southern samples reveal a much greater thickness in the north for both the thin and thick disks, though it is also the case that the fraction \(f\) of the thick disk relative to the thin disk is also smaller in the north. We show an explicit illustration of this correlation in Table [\[table:f\]](#table:f){reference-type="ref" reference="table:f"}, which lists the fit parameters for the two-disk component fits (note Eq. ([\[fit\]](#fit){reference-type="ref" reference="fit"})) to the matching north and south data samples in bins of \(5^\circ-15^\circ\) bins in longitude (see Figure [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(a)), including the normalization \(N_0\), the thin- and thick-disk scale heights \(H_1\) and \(H_2\), respectively, the relative fraction \(f\) of the thick-and thin-disk populations, and the \(\chi^2/{\rm dof}\) for each fit. We show the fit results for the sample in the north fitted by itself, the sample in the south fitted by itself, and for the combined north-south sample. In the combined north-south fits, \(f\) is approximately 10%, and the thin-and thick-disk scale heights are 0.24 and 0.7 kpc, respectively, with a relatively good \(\chi^2/{\rm dof}\). When the fits are done separately for the north and south, however, the scale heights for both the thin and thick disks are always larger in the north, by about 20%-30%, with a corresponding decrease in \(f\), by about 10%-50%. This strong correlation between \(f\) and the scale heights has been noted several times previously in the literature, and it has been speculated that it is a consequence of a fitting degeneracy, rather than an indication of a variation in the scale heights and \(f\) with position or hemisphere. We refer to Figure 9 of, as well as Figure 21 of for concrete examples. The combined values of the scale heights and thick-disk fraction are in good agreement with, which analyzed observations from both the northern and southern hemispheres, finding \(H_1=0.24\) kpc and \(H_2=0.8\) kpc with \(f\) around 0.1; they, too, noted a strong correlation between \(f\) and the disk scale heights. Given the good \(\chi^2/{\rm dof}\) of the separate north and south fits shown in Table [\[table:f\]](#table:f){reference-type="ref" reference="table:f"} (to our knowledge such separate fits have not been done before), and the poorer combined fits, we suggest, rather, that the difference in scale heights and fractions with hemisphere is a real effect. Its existence supports that of a large north-south asymmetry in the vertical stellar distribution in the vicinity of the Sun. Figure 10 shows this is not due to calibration errors. The N/S differences shown in Figures [\[fig:residualoverlays\]](#fig:residualoverlays){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:residualoverlays"}--[\[fig:colorcalibration\]](#fig:colorcalibration){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:colorcalibration"} are depicted in an \((l,b,z)\), Sun-centered coordinate system. One may also present the same star-count data in an \((R,\phi,z)\) coordinate system based on the Galactic center, and this is shown in Figures [\[fig:reftable\]](#fig:reftable){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:reftable"} and [\[fig:Phibreaking\]](#fig:Phibreaking){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Phibreaking"}. Panels (a) and (b) of Figure [\[fig:reftable\]](#fig:reftable){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:reftable"} shows two azimuthal bins of star-count data from the footprint of Figure 3(a) at radial distances up to 0.5 kpc from the sun, and up to 3 kpc from the Galactic plane. The pattern of asymmetries seen in several panels of Figure [\[fig:residualoverlays\]](#fig:residualoverlays){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:residualoverlays"} is clearly present in panel (a), which combines several \((l,b)\) bins into one nearby \((R,\phi)\) bin. Panels (c)-(e) offer \((R,\phi)\) presentations of the asymmetries of the data in the expanded footprint of Figure [\[fig:footprintmatched\]](#fig:footprintmatched){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintmatched"}(b). While the selection function of the data points with \(|z|\) has not been applied, though it has been in Figure [\[fig:residualoverlays\]](#fig:residualoverlays){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:residualoverlays"}, the data samples are in all cases taken from matching north and south regions, plotting \(|z_{\rm GP}| = |z + z_\odot|\) with \(z_\odot\) = 14.9 pc. Note that the N/S thickness difference emerges as a gross feature close to the Galactic plane in both the uniform and expanded latitude samples. Figure [\[fig:Phibreaking\]](#fig:Phibreaking){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Phibreaking"} offers the broadest look at the data arranged in Galactic \((R,\phi)\) coordinates. Here raw star counts, uncorrected by the selection function, are compared in N/S matched samples. In this figure we relax the \(|z| <\) 2 kpc constraint for better illustration. The circular inset at left portrays the plane of the Galaxy marked with the azimuthal coordinate \(\phi\) and radial coordinate \(R\), where (\(R_\odot,\phi_\odot\)) = (8 kpc, 180\(^\circ\)). We have broken our coverage in the (\(R\), \(\phi\)) plane into smaller regions indicated by the small solid dots, and we have picked out the dots (regions) with the most star counts, as indicated by the red box, for explicit illustration. The faint large gray arcs indicate curves of constant \(R\) in steps of 0.5 kpc. Each row of overlapping inset panels selects a different \(\phi\) range, as marked. Each panel shows in black (red) the northern (southern) Galactic hemisphere counts as a function of \(|z_{\rm GP}|\) from 0-6 kpc, where \(|z_{\rm GP}|\) has been adjusted to account for a universal offset of the Sun above the plane of \(z_\odot\) = 14.9 pc. The fact that the north and south counts converge at large \(|z_{\rm GP}|\) suggests that this offset is appropriate. While the fine asymmetrical structure in \((l,b)\) is not visible, one still may clearly see, especially in the panel for \(8 < R < 8.5\) kpc, \(175^\circ < \phi < 180^\circ\), that there are vertical oscillations in the stellar density near the Sun. Several other panels show an excess of counts in the south at vertical distances up to 1 kpc from the plane. We see explicitly that (i) there are more stars in the south over most of the footprint and (ii) the feature of Figure [\[fig:reftable\]](#fig:reftable){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:reftable"}(c), which drives the wave-like N/S asymmetry we have found, as well as the N/S variation in Galactic parameters, also breaks axial symmetry. It also has no analogue at slightly larger \(R\). We encourage further studies of the combined stellar and dark matter mass distributions in the solar neighborhood to delve into its origin. It should be noted that a partial explanation of these differences could come from a global calibration difference. The photometric calibration of the SDSS survey is done by studying adjacent regions across the footprint and calibrating overlapping regions together . Since the entire footprint in the north is connected, it can be calibrated in a uniform way. However, the northern and southern regions of the footprint do not overlap, so that they cannot be calibrated in this manner. Studies of the blue-tip stars suggest that the stars are systematically redder in the south . To study the implications of this, a downward shift of-16 mmag for \((g-i)_{0}\) color was implemented in the south, which would redress the typical differences in reddening found by. By repeating the fits with \((g-i)_{0}\) color as well as repeating the fits using distances determined with \((r-i)_{0}\) color, Figure [\[fig:colorcalibration\]](#fig:colorcalibration){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:colorcalibration"} is obtained. The shift in color calibration has a negligible effect on the thicknesses, as we would expect from our discussion in Section [2](#photod){reference-type="ref" reference="photod"}. Although using the \((r-i)_{0}\) color relation reveals slightly different thicknesses, the north-south offsets still exist, encouraging the stance that there is a real difference in the stellar densities between north and south.
## North-only Analysis: Scale Height Changes Across the Footprint {#Nonlyscale}
Since more stars have been observed in the north we use these observations to study variations in Galactic parameters across the footprint. Once again, we have made two different types of selections. Both divide the footprint into slices of \(5^\circ\), \(10^\circ\), and \(15^\circ\) slices in longitude, but each uses different latitudes. The first analysis uses a fixed latitude range of \(50^\circ < b <90^\circ\) and longitude range \(35^\circ < l < 210^\circ\) (Figure [\[fig:footprintnorth\]](#fig:footprintnorth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintnorth"}(a)), in which we have 1.67 million stars in total. The second analysis uses a fixed latitude range of \(30^\circ < b <90^\circ\) but only looks at the longitudes \(35^\circ < l < 60^\circ\) and \(165^\circ < l < 210^\circ\) (Figure [\[fig:footprintnorth\]](#fig:footprintnorth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintnorth"}(b)). These regions are selected in order to have the largest latitude coverage possible, and we analyze 2.22 million stars in total. Since we use \(b >30^\circ\) in order to avoid dust effects, this is the maximum range of latitude allowed by our analysis. Figures [\[fig:thinnorth\]](#fig:thinnorth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:thinnorth"} and [\[fig:thicknorth\]](#fig:thicknorth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:thicknorth"} show the thicknesses of the thin and thick disks as functions of longitude and the in-plane radial distance \(R\) from the Galactic center for both of the regions depicted in Figure [\[fig:footprintnorth\]](#fig:footprintnorth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintnorth"}. The difference in thickness for regions with the same longitudes but different latitudes reveals that the scale heights are sensitive to the value of the lower latitude cut. We have checked that this result persists once we repeat our fits to a data sample in which the \(R\) dependence has been scaled out, as per the modified selection function of Eq. ([\[selectionR\]](#selectionR){reference-type="ref" reference="selectionR"}). It can also be observed, particularly for the analysis of Figure [\[fig:footprintnorth\]](#fig:footprintnorth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintnorth"}(b) shown in Figures [\[fig:thinnorth\]](#fig:thinnorth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:thinnorth"} and [\[fig:thicknorth\]](#fig:thicknorth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:thicknorth"}, that there is an increase in thickness, for both disks, with an increase in \(R\). The value of \(R\) used is the average value of \(\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\) for the stars in that wedge that are included in the fit. The red points, corresponding to the inclusion of stars with latitudes down to \(30^\circ\), sample distances further from the Galactic center at large \(l\) and those closer to the Galactic center at small \(l\). In a single-disk model, in particular, if \(\rho(z) = \rho_0 {\rm sech}^2 (z/(2 z_0))\), then the surface mass density \(\Sigma\) has the form \(\Sigma = 4\rho_0 z_0\) . Figure [\[fig:thinnorth\]](#fig:thinnorth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:thinnorth"} shows an increase in scale height of about 10% over a change in \(R\) from 7 to 9 kpc, but from our fits we determine the parameter \(z_0\) to be more nearly constant and, moreover, we infer that \(\Sigma\) is decreasing. A change in the vertical scale height with \(R\) has been noticed previously by (and in galaxies other than the Milky Way by ), with an estimated scale height of \(\sim 247\) pc at \(R=8\) kpc, in good agreement with our result for the thin-disk scale height. Its origin has been discussed by. It is important to note that this analysis covers the entire range of latitude from \(30^\circ < b <90^\circ\); this provides us with more statistics than our analyses limited to higher latitudes. In all of our results, the thin-and thick-disk thicknesses appear to depend on the lower limit of the latitudes included in the analysis. To show this effect explicitly, Figure [\[fig:latitudechange\]](#fig:latitudechange){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:latitudechange"} shows how the thickness depends on te minimum latitude chosen, for a region with \(55^\circ < l < 60^\circ\) and a maximum latitude of \(90^\circ\). We thus see that a higher minimum latitude cut leads to a larger thickness, for both the thin and thick disks; the change with minimum latitude can be as large as 20%. Since we employ a selection function to eliminate geometric effects and the sizes of the systematic errors that could account for such a change are ruled out (see Section 2), we expect that this apparent change arises from one or more physical effects. In order to understand this apparent change in thickness with latitude cut, regions of a low minimum latitude cut (\(30^\circ < b <50^\circ\)) and a high minimum latitude cut (\(50^\circ < b <90^\circ\)) are compared in Figure [\[fig:latitudeoverlay\]](#fig:latitudeoverlay){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:latitudeoverlay"}. This has been repeated for all the regions shown in Figure [\[fig:footprintnorth\]](#fig:footprintnorth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:footprintnorth"}(b). Although the shapes do not change grossly, it can nevertheless be seen at high \(z\) that the higher-latitude data points have a greater stellar density than the lower-latitude data points. This illustrates how the measured thickness could increase with increasing minimum latitude cut. The apparent increase in thickness could be the result of vertically changing stellar populations or of a change in in-plane structure. The manner in which a change in the selected latitude window changes the sampling of the Galactic plane is illustrated in Figure [\[fig:selectionfunction\]](#fig:selectionfunction){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:selectionfunction"}. The different latitude selections also sample the stellar populations at different average heights above the Galactic plane as shown in Table [\[table:avgz\]](#table:avgz){reference-type="ref" reference="table:avgz"}. Note that \(\langle z_{\rm raw} \rangle\) determines the average in \(z\) of the raw stellar number counts---no selection function has been applied. We observe that the approximate difference in \(\langle z_{\rm raw} \rangle\) in the two latitude samples is about \(0.5\) kpc, with the difference increasing slightly, to about \(0.6\) kpc, at large \(l\). Since we expect the metallicity of a selected star to be smaller as its value of \(z\) grows larger, noting that this has been established in a recent spectroscopic study of red giants , we expect that the vertical changes in the metallicity of the stellar populations should play a role to some extent.
We now quantify the latitude-dependent difference in shape in each panel of Figure [\[fig:latitudeoverlay\]](#fig:latitudeoverlay){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:latitudeoverlay"}. To do this, we have determined the metallicity shift required to minimize the shape differences between the high-and low-latitude samples. Applying the selection function to each latitude sample, we multiplied the number of counts in each bin in the high-latitude sample by an overall scaling factor such that the total counts for each latitude sample are the same. This has been done to permit a comparison of the vertical distribution of the stars regardless of their net number. We then examined the three different regions in \(z\), in which we have seen shape differences, separately. In each one we executed a \(\chi^2\) test to determine whether the shapes of the two latitude samples are the same, computing, namely, \[\chi_{b}^2 = \sum_{i=1}^{N_{\rm bin}} \frac{\left(n_i^{>}-n_i^{<}\right)^2}{n_i^{<}} \,,\] where \(n_i^>\) and \(n_i^<\) are the numbers of stars in the (rescaled) high-latitude and low-latitude samples in bin \(i\) of \(N_{\rm bin}\) equal-width bins. We then modified the metallicity of the higher-latitude sample by steps of-0.01 until \(\chi_b^2\) is minimized. We repeated this for each region in \(z\) and then repeated the entire process for each slice of longitude. The results of this analysis are shown in Table [\[table:avgz\]](#table:avgz){reference-type="ref" reference="table:avgz"} as a metallicity shift \(\Delta\)\[Fe/H\] in dex and as a shift in the intrinsic magnitude \(\Delta M_r\) in mmag as per Eq. ([\[ppgmi0\]](#ppgmi0){reference-type="ref" reference="ppgmi0"}). We can see that the shifts in \(\Delta M_r\) are typically much larger, particularly at large \(z\), than the photometric calibration shifts of less than 10 mmag discussed by and thus speak to a physical effect. (We have also checked that similar features emerge when we repeat our analysis in \((r-i)_0\) color.) These shifts are largely, but not completely, explained by the common paradigm of two Galactic disks---a thin disk with a \[Fe/H\] of-0.3 and a thick disk with a \[Fe/H\] of-0.8 with different scale heights. Different \((l,b)\) bins sample different ratios of thin-and thick-disk stars, and thus our approximation that all stars have a \[Fe/H\] of-0.3 is more incorrect as \(|z|\) moves further above 0.5 kpc. Interestingly, too, the manner in which the metallicity changes, that it decreases substantially at large \(z\), is also consistent with the trend found in spectroscopic studies , though the change is also larger in the large \(l\) samples at large \(z\) than the typical shifts observed in those studies . It is intriguing that a simple thick-and thin-disk paradigm is not enough to explain the very large shifts seen for \(1.7 < |z| < 2.0\) kpc, toward the anticenter (\(165^\circ < l < 210^\circ\)), and here a significantly different stellar population, with lower metallicity than the thick disk may be present in significant amounts. This is worth exploring further. It is also possible that the vertical structure changes as one moves across the Galactic plane. We anticipate that the rich spectroscopic data sets to emerge from the *Gaia* mission will help to resolve the origin of the effect we have found regarding the change in the vertical distributions of stars with latitude. We nevertheless view photometric studies of the sort we have pioneered here as being of continuing utility, because they serve as an efficient way of discerning what the most interesting regions of the sky might be for detailed spectroscopic studies.
# Summary and Future Prospects
We have used a photometric sample of up to 3.6 million K and M dwarf stars from the SDSS to study the structure of the Galactic disk in the vicinity of the Sun. By selecting different regions of Galactic latitude and longitude, we have been able to study changes in structure as a function of the stars' location within and above the Galactic plane. As shown in Figure [\[fig:histogramsmatchedset\]](#fig:histogramsmatchedset){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:histogramsmatchedset"}, the stellar number count distributions are remarkably smooth across the footprint, though we have discovered significant changes in their distribution nonetheless. Our sample of red, main-sequence stars are the longest-lived stars, so that we would expect its one-body distribution function to be the solution of a collisionless Boltzmann equation, which describes the interaction of a star with a mean-field mass distribution. We have presumed this solution to be both axially and mirror (north-south) symmetric in adopting a \({\rm sech}^2 (z/2H_1)\) form for its spatial projection in \(z\), \(n(z)\), as we have used in Eq. ([\[fit\]](#fit){reference-type="ref" reference="fit"}). With this expectation, we have analyzed the stars and their distribution through matched observations in the north and the south, as well as through observations made in the north only. The departures we have found break these supposed symmetries, though we cannot definitely say whether this is the result of recent dynamical interactions of the disk stars with external agents or because of other internal effects, such as the presence of the spiral arms or the Galactic bar, so that they do not hold precisely. Our combined north-south analysis reveals a difference in the stellar densities north and south, providing further evidence for a vertical wave in number counts found by and, as well as circumstantial evidence for dynamical symmetry breaking of the presumed integrals of motion. We have presented, in Figure [\[fig:residualoverlays\]](#fig:residualoverlays){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:residualoverlays"} and Table [\[table:f\]](#table:f){reference-type="ref" reference="table:f"}, quantitative measures of the differences in star counts in matched areas above and below the plane of the Milky Way as a function of distance in \((l,b)\) bins of \({\cal O}(10^\circ)\). We find significant offsets from north-south symmetry in individual bins of up to 20% in star counts, even after correcting for the location of the Sun at some 14.9 pc above the plane. These differences cannot be explained solely by misestimations of the metallicities of the stars, because the differences are too large and oscillate in \(|z|\) with a vertical period of about \(400\) pc. We have also studied the evolution of the north-south differences with longitude and find that they become more pronounced as \(l\) approaches \(l \approx 180^\circ\). Panels (c)-(d) in Figure [\[fig:reftable\]](#fig:reftable){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:reftable"} (and Figure [\[fig:Phibreaking\]](#fig:Phibreaking){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Phibreaking"}) indicate variations in the azimuthal, in addition to the vertical, direction. Although we have observed vertical wave-like features (see Figure 8), such are not apparent in the breaking of axial symmetry we observe. A close look at Figure 12 reveals, rather, an impulse localized within 5 degrees of the Galactic anticenter. This is intriguingly reminiscent of the numerical study of the impact of the Sagittarius dSph galaxy with the Galactic disk by. A comparison of the disk thicknesses, north and south, also reveals that the thicknesses are larger in the north, though this is also correlated with a smaller thick-disk fraction in the north. These results remain after correcting for possible color calibration offsets and repeating the analysis with \((r-i)_{0}\) color. In addition, we have used our comparative analysis to determine the inferred location of the Sun above the Galactic plane across the footpoint: we can say that this distance, \(z_\odot\), changes across the footprint, speaking possibly to ripples in the stellar density across the plane. No significant correlation is seen between sightlines toward spiral arms where the stellar spiral arms of the Galaxy appear out of the plane by up to several hundred parsecs and the wave-like overdensities we have seen at distances of \(> 500\) pc---but the data are very limited: such a correlation cannot be ruled out. Studying the observations in the north exclusively admits the possibility of studying the effects of changing latitude, allowing the analysis of observations up to \(b=90^\circ\) with improved statistics. We have found that the determined thicknesses, for both thin and thick disks, do depend on the value of the minimum latitude analyzed. An increase in thickness was also found with increasing lower latitude cut, which is likely representative of vertically changing stellar populations or of changes in the in-plane structure. Finally we have compared the shape in the stellar distributions with vertical height for different latitude windows, finding definite changes in shape that we think are reflective of either or both stellar population changes and/or changes in the in-plane structure. A variety of systematic effects have been considered in this study. The effects of dust are minimized by employing dust corrections and restricting our analysis to out-of-plane sightlines with \(|b|>30^\circ\). We have also performed a photometric test for giants and have found that their infiltration into our analysis sample is completely negligible. The possibility of a color calibration effect that could be different in the north and south has also been studied explicitly and determined to be insignificant. Our error in converting from stellar colors to distance is a combination of that in the photometric calibration in magnitude and color and of metallicity misestimation, noting that we have used \[Fe/H\] of the thin disk for a mixed population of thin-and thick-disk stars in the absolute magnitude calculation. The distance errors from calibration and color error have been estimated to be approximately 10% rms, or 0.2 in absolute magnitude , and we have refined our distance assessment using red globular clusters. As for the metallicity error, we reiterate that we fix \[Fe/H\] to be-0.3, i.e., we assume a 100% thin-disk population for our photometric metallicity correction. An additional error would appear if we were, rather, sampling a 100% thick-disk population with \[Fe/H\] of-0.8. The empirical effects of sampling different ratios of thin-and thick-disk populations stars in different \((l,b)\) bins are tabulated in Table [\[table:avgz\]](#table:avgz){reference-type="ref" reference="table:avgz"}. We leave the exercise of "inverting" the results of this table to deduce the thin-disk and thick-disk fractions in each bin to a future work. We note that the results are broadly consistent with a switchover from a thin-disk to a thick-disk population as one moves from heights of \(< 0.5\) kpc to over 1.5 kpc above or below the plane, with a few places where halo or other low-metallicity stars, with \[Fe/H\] of-1.6, may represent a significant fraction of the mix toward the Galactic anticenter. We ask the question of whether the larger differences of up to 20% in stellar density between the north and south in various longitude bins seen in Figure [\[fig:residualoverlays\]](#fig:residualoverlays){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:residualoverlays"}, could be due to a significant difference in the metallicity of the population of stars between the north and the south, rather than a difference in overall star density at a given distance. For instance, following the lower right panel in Figure [\[fig:residualoverlays\]](#fig:residualoverlays){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:residualoverlays"}, which has \(165^\circ < l < 180^\circ\), \(46.6^\circ < |b| < 64.3^\circ\), there is a 20% excess in density of star counts at \(|z|=0.7\) kpc in the north versus the south. To explain this difference as a difference in population metallicity and not as an overall stellar density wave, one would need, for instance, a very large difference in the metallicity as a function of \(|z|\) in the ratio of thin-to thick-disk stars between north and south, and that large difference in metals is not compatible with the relatively smooth change in metals content of stars seen around the Galaxy . Plotting the matched N/S stellar count data in Galactic \((R,\phi,z)\) coordinates shows a 20% excess of counts in the south just beyond (0-0.5 kpc) the solar radius toward the anticenter at a height of 0.4 kpc below the Galactic plane. This excess becomes a 10% deficit (or excess in the north) once one reaches a height of 0.8 kpc above the plane (see Figure [\[fig:Phibreaking\]](#fig:Phibreaking){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Phibreaking"}). It is interesting to note that at lower vertical heights, the Orion spur is in this same part of the sky. In other directions, as in we see in Figure [\[fig:residualoverlays\]](#fig:residualoverlays){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:residualoverlays"}, at similar (sub-kpc) distances from the Sun, the asymmetry mostly manifests itself as an excess of counts in the south at about 0.4 kpc below the plane. In all subsamples of the matched north-south star-count data, we report here that the scale height of both the thin-and thick-disk stellar populations appears to be systematically larger in the north than the south, when the scale heights are fit separately. This may indicate a slight displacement of the center plane of the thick disk above the thin disk near the Sun or other configurations suggesting that the disks are not fully in stationary equilibrium. These quantitative locations and amplitudes of over-and underdensities should be useful in serving as a constraint on dynamical models of the Galaxy, which would describe its dark matter distribution, its satellites, and its stellar disk as they interact and evolve over time. Insights into the past history and distribution of matter can be inferred by a model that reproduces these disk asymmetries. We note, too, that comparing the vertical distribution of number counts as a function of selected latitude may prove an efficient way of locating possible stellar populations, or streams, of ultralow metallicity for subsequent spectroscopic study. The \(\Lambda\)CDM model speaks to dark matter with small-scale phase-space structure and motivates the search for stellar streams. Follow-up studies at yet higher resolution with our methods could look for variations and asymmetries with greater sensitivity, though they would likely require improved photometric calibrations and reddening corrections. These improvements already largely exist , so that we look forward to data from the *Gaia* era with confidence in the ability to further and refine the studies pioneered here. \(^*\)Present Address: School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
[^1]: https://root.cern.ch | {'timestamp': '2017-07-19T02:00:48', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01900', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01900'} |
{'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:03:00', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01589', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01589'} |
|
# Abstract {#abstract .unnumbered}
**Background**: The analyses of human daily interactive behaviors at the population level play a critical role to understand many dynamic processes, e.g., information diffusion, and disease transmission, taking place in the human society. The recent advance of information technologies such as mobile phone, RFID, wireless sensor, and our interest in, WiFi provides powerful measures to digitize the population interactions and facilitate quantitative investigations.\
**Methods and Findings**: To explore large-scale population indoor interactions, we analyze *18,715* users' WiFi access logs recorded in a Chinese university campus during *3* months, and define two categories of human interactions, the event interaction (EI) and the temporal interaction (TI). The EI helps construct a transmission graph, and the TI helps build an interval graph. The dynamics of EIs show that their active durations are truncated power-law distributed, which is independent on the number of involved individuals. The transmission duration presents a truncated power-law behavior at the daily timescale with weekly periodicity. Besides, those *'leaf'* individuals in the aggregated contact network may participate in the *'super-connecting cliques'* in the aggregated transmission graph. Analyzing the dynamics of the interval graph, we find that the probability distribution of TIs' inter-event duration also displays a truncated power-law pattern at the daily timescale with weekly periodicity, while the pairwise individuals with burst interactions are prone to randomly select their interactive locations, and those individuals with periodic interactions have preferred interactive locations.\
**Conclusion and Significance**: The dynamics of a large-scale population's indoor interactions shows the convolution of human activities' daily bursts and weekly rhythms. The 'leaf' individuals in the aggregated contact network gathering to function as 'hubs' in the transmission graph highlights the significant difference between aggregated and temporal structures, and the analyses of temporal dyads from the spatiotemporal perspective pave a new path to predict human interactive behaviors.
# Introduction {#introduction .unnumbered}
Nowadays, a great deal of digital technologies are unobtrusively embedded into the physical world of human daily activities: we communicate with each other through emails and/or mobile phones, pay the shopping with credit cards, use public transportation by transit cards, and surf via wired or wireless networks. These technical innovations not only reshape our social life, but also record tremendous digital trajectories of human activities, which provide proxy clues to understand human behavioral patterns. For instance, Pentland et al. constructed 'sociometers' to capture human honest signals in the workplace to infer their productivity and creativity. Eagle et al. used Bluetooth embedded in the mobile phones to infer friendships from close proximity interactions. Barrat and his colleagues built a flexible framework based on the distributed active Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology to record human face-to-face interactions in different rendezvouses, e.g., conference, office, hospital, museum, and school. Salathé et al. developed wireless sensors to evaluate the respiratory disease transmission risk among the members of a high school through person-to-person contacts. Takaguchi and his colleagues analyzed two sets of face-to-face interaction logs sampled by infrared sensor devices to predict conversation patterns. Since human physical close proximity has been recognized to play a crucial role to (biological and computer) virus transmission, word-of-mouth information diffusion, and human social ties, these fruitful researches not only shed light on human interactive features in a small community, but also inspire us to put a step further to explore human indoor interactions in an environment with a large-scale 'natural' population. Recent years, WiFi(or known as IEEE 802.11), as a ubiquitous wireless data exchange technology, has become one of the brightest areas in the communication business. Actually, WiFi signals can be found at almost every corner of the urban areas, and the notion of 'WiFi-city' becomes reality. A university is a snapshot of the modern society, so is the WiFi coverage, where the WiFi control system records the digital access logs of the authorized WiFi users during their activities in the campus. Such WiFi access records work the proxy of a large-scale population's interactive activities with time stamps, which deserve more extensive efforts to capture the temporal patterns of their dynamics. The WiFi dataset involved in this study was collected at Handan campus of Fudan University in Shanghai, China, which contains *18,715* WiFi users' individual behavioral trajectories during *3* months of a fall semester. We define two categories of human indoor interactions: event interaction(EI) and temporal interaction(TI). From the perspective of temporal networks, the EIs help construct a transmission graph to characterize the group interactive features, and the TIs build an interval graph to characterize the dyad interactive features. The dynamics of EIs show that their active durations are truncated power-law distributed and 'size-free', independent on the number of involved individuals. The transmission duration presents a power-law behavior at the daily timescale with weekly periodicity. Besides, some *'leaf'* individuals in the aggregated contact network participate in the *'super-connecting cliques'* of the aggregated transmission graph. Analyzing the dynamics of the interval graph, we find that the probability distribution of TIs' inter-event duration also displays a truncated power-law pattern at the daily timescale with weekly periodicity, while the pairwise individuals with burst interactions are prone to randomly select their interactive locations, and those individuals with periodic interactions have preferred interactive locations.
# Results {#results .unnumbered}
## Two Categories of Human Indoor Interactions and Temporal Networks {#two-categories-of-human-indoor-interactions-and-temporal-networks .unnumbered}
Before transforming the WiFi data of access logs as the proxy of a large-scale population's indoor interactions, we state our main assumption in this paper: the WiFi devices seeing the same wireless access point(WAP) infers an indoor interaction among these devices' owners (see *Methods* and *Text SI* for the validity of the main assumption). We first define two categories of human indoor interactions and temporal graphs. Figure [\[schematic\]](#schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="schematic"}(a) shows an instance which translates three WiFi users' access logs into the individual behavioral traces. The bold lines pertain to their online durations. In the observed epoch \[\(t_0,t_7\)\], these three users are uniquely recorded by this WAP. **From Event Interactions To Transmission Graph** With the aforementioned main assumption-the users 'seeing' the same WAP have an indoor interaction, Figure [\[schematic\]](#schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="schematic"}(b) illustrate the process of translating individual behavioral trajectories into event interactions(EIs) and constructing the corresponding transmission graph(TG). Event interaction is defined to characterize the group interactive dynamics and evolution features, which facilitates the analysis of epidemic spread or information diffusion. For instance, in the epoch of \[\(t_{1},t_{2}\)\], the online duration of *A* and *B* are overlapped, we therefore define an EI \(E_{AB}^{t_1}\) characterizing the fact that *A* and *B* are assembled as a contact group. Regarding event interactions as vertices, we define two vertices are linked given the following three rules are satisfied:
1. In the time series, a source EI (e.g., \(E_{AB}^{t_1}\)) is the closest EI prior to the sink EI (\(E_{ABC}^{t_2}\)).
2. At least one user coexists in the source and sink EIs.
3. When there are several sources before one sink, any set of the shared users between the given source and sink EIs never intersect with each other(set).
The three rules ensure that the source EI has a potential to transfer some information or virus to the sink EI due to the intermediate role of shared individuals. As illustrated in Figure 1(b), \(E_{AB}^{t_1}\) is active in the epoch \[\(t_{1},t_{2}\)\] and \(E_{ABC}^{t_2}\) in \[\(t_{2},t_{3}\)\], while two EIs satisfy the above three rules, a directed edge links these two vertices in the transmission graph. To quantify the temporal information in event interactions and the transmission graph, we introduce the following quantities:
- The size *s* of a given EI is defined as the number of users involved.
- If a given EI is active in the period of \[\(t^{begin},t^{end}\)\], its active duration is defined as\
\(\Delta t^{EI}=t^{end}-t^{begin}\).
- Given two connected EIs, \(i, j\), linked in the TG, denote the edge weight \(\omega_{ij}=(\delta, t^{observed})\), i.e., the shortest transmission duration from the source \(E_i\) to the sink \(E_j\) is \(\delta\) when observed at the time \(t^{observed}\). (Without special statement, \(t^{observed}\) is considered as \(t^{begin}\) of each source EI in this paper.)
Generally, the topological properties of a temporal graph are measured from the corresponding aggregated network on a given time window. Here, we aggregate the transmission graphs on the whole observation period (*3* months) to generate the aggregated transmission graph (ATG), and define several quantities as follows:
- The frequency \(n^{EI}\) gives the number of EI's active times. For instance, \(E_{AB}\) in Figure [\[schematic\]](#schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="schematic"}(b) takes place in two time intervals, \([t_1,t_2]\) and \([t_3,t_4]\), so the frequency \(n^{EI}_{AB}=2\).
- The number of repeated transmission paths from source EI (e.g.,\(E_i\)) to sink EI (\(E_j\)) is frequency \(n^{TP}_{E_iE_j}\).
**From Temporal Interactions To Interval Graph** We further define temporal interactions to characterize the dyad interactions. With the main assumption mentioned above, *A* and *B* in Figure [\[schematic\]](#schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="schematic"}(a,c), who share a common duration, assemble into a temporal interaction \(T_{AB}^{t_1}\) during the epoch \[\(t_{1},t_{4}\)\]. The set of temporal interactions(TIs) can be represented by an interval graph directly, where users are the vertices, and TIs are the edges. The following definitions of an interval graph are introduced to quantify the temporal information of dyad interactions:
- Given an active TI during \[\(t^{started},t^{finished}\)\], the active duration of the edge (TI) is\
\(\Delta t^{TI}= t^{started}-t^{finished}\).
- The frequency of edge \(n^{TI}_{ij}\) gives the number of times that two connected users \(i,j\) repeat their TIs.
- Given the same dyad's two successive TIs, \(T^{1}_{ij}\) and \(T^{2}_{ij}\) (\(i,j\) are two users), their active durations are \[\(t^{started}_{1},t^{end}_{1}\)\] and \[\(t^{started}_{2},t^{end}_{2}\)\], respectively. The inter-event duration is defined as the difference between the beginning time of these two successive TIs (\(\Delta\tau=t^{started}_{2}-t^{started}_{1}\)). Take *A* and *C* in Figure [\[schematic\]](#schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="schematic"}(c) as an example, \(\Delta\tau_{AC}=t_{6}-t_{2}\).
The dyads' TIs have a non-decreasing time sequence if their frequency \(n^{TI}_{ij}>1\). As shown in Figure [\[schematic\]](#schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="schematic"}(c), the TIs of *A,C* have a non-decreasing active time sequence:\[\(t_2,t_3\)\],\[\(t_6,t_7\)\]. To summarize, as shown in Figure [\[schematic\]](#schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="schematic"}, event interactions are driven by the group access-related events, while temporal interactions are driven by the time sequences of dyad interactions. Each event interaction possesses an exclusive time interval on the WAP it takes place, whereas different temporal interactions may coexist with each other (e.g., \(T_{AC}^{t_2}\) and \(T_{BC}^{t_3}\) in Figure [\[schematic\]](#schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="schematic"}(c)).
## Dynamics of event interaction {#dynamics-of-event-interaction .unnumbered}
Figure [\[dynei\]](#dynei){reference-type="ref" reference="dynei"}(a) shows that the probability distribution of EIs' active durations collected in 3 months is a truncated power law (the exponent of the power-law part approximates to 1), indicating that the long-lasting group interactions can hardly survive due to the frequent emergence of abundant short-active-duration events. In Figure [\[dynei\]](#dynei){reference-type="ref" reference="dynei"}(b), the number of event interactions with a given size (*N(s)*) is exponential distributed, which further implies that the EIs having large sizes are rare. Therefore, it is natural to explore the dependence between the distribution of EIs' active durations \(\Delta t^{EI}\) and a given size *s*. Firstly, we study the impact of small sizes on EIs' active durations: the probability distributions of EIs' active durations \(\Delta t^{EI}_{s}\) with size \(s=2,3,4,5\) exhibit the truncated power-law behaviors, and their power-law parts present the similar exponents close to 1. However, their exponential cutoffs gradually decay with the growth of event size(Figure [\[dynei\]](#dynei){reference-type="ref" reference="dynei"}(c)). Besides, when the size of EIs is larger than 5, the influence of EIs' sizes to their active durations is subtle. Figure [\[dynei\]](#dynei){reference-type="ref" reference="dynei"}(d) reports the probability distributions of the EIs' active durations with a given size \(s\geq 5\), which keeps almost invariant with the growth of size, i.e., the active durations of EIs are *'size free'* in this case. As shown in Figure [\[dynei\]](#dynei){reference-type="ref" reference="dynei"}, all EIs' active durations are less than 5 hours, which are much less than the circadian rhythms. On the contrary, many transmission durations are obviously longer than 24 hours. In Figure [\[dyntg\]](#dyntg){reference-type="ref" reference="dyntg"}(a), the probability distribution of the transmission durations in the whole dataset falls into a bifold power-law with the turning point approximately equal to 24 hours, indicating the existence of circadian rhythms. We also calculate the integral days spent by each \(\delta\) (\[\(\frac{\delta}{1440}\)\]) to examine whether some periodicity exists. In Figure [\[dyntg\]](#dyntg){reference-type="ref" reference="dyntg"}(b), the probability distribution of \[\(\frac{\delta}{1440}\)\] has two peaks at the 1st day and 7th day, i.e., the daily bursty behavior of successive event interactions coevolutes with weekly rhythms. We further perform the de-seasoning analysis to remove the circadian or weekly rhythms presented in Figure [\[dyntg\]](#dyntg){reference-type="ref" reference="dyntg"}(a,b) with two methods: I) natural de-seasoning method: only conserve the source and sink EIs taking place in the same day; II) artificial de-seasoning time-shuffled method in to suit event interactions' definition (the details see *Text SI*). As shown in Figure [\[dyntg\]](#dyntg){reference-type="ref" reference="dyntg"}(c), the probability distributions of the transmission durations 'filtered' by two de-seasoning methods both fall into the truncated power-laws, which indicates that the bursty behavior of event interactions takes place independently on the daily and weekly rhythms. In addition, we examine the dependence of the source and sink EIs' active durations of each transmission path as shown in Table [\[dependence\]](#dependence){reference-type="ref" reference="dependence"}. Both the Pearson's coefficients and memory coefficients between them are very minor, indicating there does not exist the interdependence although the two groups of EIs share some individuals. From the definition of transmission graph, the transmission durations may be equal to the source EIs' active durations. However, their Pearson's coefficients and memory coefficients are also very small, hence the source EI' active duration is only the lower bound of the corresponding transmission duration, and there is no more dependence between them. We construct the aggregated transmission graph (ATG) with the whole 3-month WiFi data set (the statistical properties of the ATG see Figure S1 and *Text SI*). In Figure S1(a), most of the vertices only have small out-degrees (\(k_{out}<10\)) and in-degrees(\(k_{in}<10\)), but there are 20 vertices with both high out-degrees and in-degrees to function as 'super-connecting groups'(hubs) (see *Text SI*). Recent studies reveal that super-connectors(hubs) in an aggregated network dominate the susceptible-infected-susceptible spreading processes due to the fact that they are self-sustained sources continually diffusing the virus to other neighbors. Therefore, the members of these 'super-connecting groups' play a crucial role in the dynamics of disease transmission. However, traditional studies about the roles of individuals in the spreading processes focus on human contact network (for reviews see ), where vertices are individuals and links are their contacts. We also aggregate the whole WiFi data set into a contact network(the detailed aggregation procedure refers to *Text SI*) and find that the members of those 'super-connecting groups' are 'leaf' individuals in the contact network(red circle in Figure [\[leafhub\]](#leafhub){reference-type="ref" reference="leafhub"}(a)). Moreover, we further explore two other human indoor interaction data sets collected in a conference and an public exhibition(see *Methods and Materials*). Both these two high-resolution human face-to-face data sets(Figure [\[leafhub\]](#leafhub){reference-type="ref" reference="leafhub"}(b,c)) and our data set (Figure [\[leafhub\]](#leafhub){reference-type="ref" reference="leafhub"}(a)) illustrate that 'leaf' individuals in the static human contact network gather to function as 'hubs' in the transmission graph independently on different rendezvouses, indicating that the roles of many 'leaf' individuals in a traditional static contact network may have been underestimated in a spreading process.
## Dynamics of temporal interaction {#dynamics-of-temporal-interaction .unnumbered}
As shown in Figure [\[dynti\]](#dynti){reference-type="ref" reference="dynti"}(a), the probability distribution of TIs' active durations shows an exponential pattern(and the maximum value of \(\Delta t^{TI}\) is less than 24 hours), which is different from the empirical results of human close proximity interactions recorded by Bluetooth or wireless sensors. This difference might derive from the fact that our data reflects the university daily teaching schedules and the human circadian rhythms, which constrain the individuals' resident periods in classrooms. Since the TIs' active durations can not reflect the population's interactive features beyond one day, we analyze the probability distribution \(P(n^{TI})\) of TIs' frequencies in Figure [\[dynti\]](#dynti){reference-type="ref" reference="dynti"}(b). The outcome of power-law distribution indicates that although the number of the frequent contacting pairwise individuals is far less than that of the casual encounters, they can not be ignored. The inter-event duration measures the time interval between two successive TIs of the same dyads (considering the start point of the two TIs). We also partition all the inter-event durations into two subsets according to the following criterion: whether or not two TIs of the same two users take place in the same day. As shown in Figure [\[dynti\]](#dynti){reference-type="ref" reference="dynti"}(c), the probability distribution of the inter-event durations of the successive TIs taking place in the same day exhibits a truncated power-law, which is similar to the findings in. Moreover, Figure [\[dynti\]](#dynti){reference-type="ref" reference="dynti"}(d) reports the probability distribution of the inter-event duration of the successive TIs taking place in different days, where the red circles emphasize that there are many remarkably peaks indicating the weekly periodicity of the inter-event features. Therefore, the temporal interactions is in fact the convolution of burst behaviors on daily timescale and weekly rhythms. To further explore the pairwise individuals' inter-event durations, we randomly choose two frequently interactive dyads. The two chosen series of temporal interactions are labeled as *TI 1* and *TI 2* with frequency \(n^{TI}_1=56,n^{TI}_2=59\), respectively. In Figure [\[spatiotemporal\]](#spatiotemporal){reference-type="ref" reference="spatiotemporal"}(a), the time series *TI 1* shows a typical burst characteristics, while the time series *TI 2* presents more regular intervals between two active events. We analyze the cumulative probability distribution(CPD) of the inter-event durations of *TI 1, TI 2* in Figure [\[spatiotemporal\]](#spatiotemporal){reference-type="ref" reference="spatiotemporal"}(b). The CPD of *TI 1*'s inter-event durations falls into a power-law with the cutoff of one week (10,000 minutes), while the CPD of *TI 2*'s inter-event durations presents an exponential form. In addition, there does not exist the dependence between TI's active durations and inter-event durations as shown in Figure S3, which are uncorrelated. Since the addresses of WAPs are encoded in the temporal interactions of pairwise users, we define '*spatial entropy*' to measure the spatial information of involved temporal interactions: \[H_{ij}(n^{TI})=-\sum\limits_{\ell=1}\limits^{L}p_{\ell} \ln p_{\ell}\] (\(L \leq n^{TI}\) and \(n^{TI} \geq 2\)), where \(p_{\ell}\) is the probability that the TIs of users \(i,j\) simultaneously occur at the location '\(\ell\)' (equivalent to WAP '\(\ell\)'). The average spatial entropy with a given frequency is averaged as: \[<H(n^{TI})>=\frac{\sum\limits_{ij\in \Psi } H_{ij}(n^{TI})}{N(n^{TI})}\] where \(\Psi\) represents the set of pairwise users with the same frequency (\(n^{TI}\)), and \(N(n^{TI})\) is the size of \(\Psi\). Figure S4 reports the average spatial entropy \(<H(n^{TI})>\) increases with the growth of frequency \(n^{TI}\) at the population level. However, at the level of dyads, the TIs' spatial entropy are independent on their frequency \(n^{TI}\), as illustrated by two aforementioned (*TI 1, TI 2*) in Figure [\[spatiotemporal\]](#spatiotemporal){reference-type="ref" reference="spatiotemporal"}(a). We further observe the occurrence probability of *TI 1, TI 2* in Figure [\[spatiotemporal\]](#spatiotemporal){reference-type="ref" reference="spatiotemporal"}(c). The low entropy of *TI 2* (\(H = 0.25\)) indicates that two individuals have preferred interactive locations, and the predication of their future interactive location is possible. While the high entropy of *TI 1*(\(H = 2.48\)) means that the involved individuals randomly select their interactive locations. To summarize, we conclude that the pair of individuals with burst interactions (*TI 1* in Figure [\[spatiotemporal\]](#spatiotemporal){reference-type="ref" reference="spatiotemporal"}(b)) randomly select their interactive locations (Figure [\[spatiotemporal\]](#spatiotemporal){reference-type="ref" reference="spatiotemporal"}(c)), and the pair of individuals with periodic interactions (*TI 2*) present their preference on the interactive locations.
# Materials and Methods {#materials-and-methods .unnumbered}
## Ethics Statement {#ethics-statement .unnumbered}
Although there is no official institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee in Fudan University, this research achieves the approvement from the Informatization Office of Fudan University, which is the chief office responsible for the deployment of the WiFi wireless access point network and data collection at Fudan University. According to the local regulation rules of Fudan University 'THE REGULATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION OF FUDAN UNIVERSITY WIFI CAMPUS USERS' (available: http://www.xxb.fudan.edu.cn/s/52/t/104/42/e6/info17126.htm (Chinese Edition)), the part of the ninth provision, 'Without licence, monitor other people's information with any monitor software is forbidden.', we have signed a confidentiality agreement and obtained the permission from the Informatization Office of Fudan University, the administrative unit of department level in Chinese Government. We declare that we have the responsibility to protect the privacy of the WiFi Campus users at Fudan University involved in this research, the data set involved is de-identified, and none privacy information of the WiFi users are available.
## Study Setting {#study-setting .unnumbered}
The WiFi wireless access point(WAP) network involved in this study is deployed at Handan campus of Fudan University in Shanghai, China. All of the WAPs deployed in the Campus provide the dual-band(802.11g/n (2.4-GHz) and 802.11a (5-GHz)) free wireless accessing services to all the authorized campus members (e.g., students, teachers, office staffs and visiting scholars). These members' wireless electronic devices are generally automatically connected to the *closest* WAP. Only when the WAP is overloaded, the device will be switched to another adjacent WAP. In the campus WiFi system of Fudan University, each WAP can serve around 50 users. Considering the percentage of students equipping wireless devices in the involved data set collected in the teaching buildings, it is sufficient to guarantee that generally every wireless device is served by the closest WAP. Furthermore, the number of devices co-served by one WAP is equal to the size of event interactions. As shown in Figure [\[dynei\]](#dynei){reference-type="ref" reference="dynei"}(b), the maximum number of co-served devices is less than 50, i.e., all the involved WAPs were not overloaded in the three months.
## The Pre-processing of the Data Set {#the-pre-processing-of-the-data-set .unnumbered}
The main data set used in our study is named as 'FudanWiFi09' which records the users' access logs in the 2009-2010 fall semester (18/10/2009-9/1/2010). It contains the hardware information of users' electronic devices (the Media Access Control address, CPU trademark, et al.), the hardware information of the connected WAP, and the connecting/disconnecting time as well. Since the Media Access Control address, as the unique serial number, can uniquely identify different electronic devices and WAPs, we conserve them with the connecting/disconnecting time in 'FudanWiFi09'. From the statistics of Fudan University (http://www.fudan.edu.cn/new_genview/genview.htm), there are totally 33,239 students, teachers and staffs in the campus, and 'FudanWiFi09' contains the records of 22,050 individuals' 423,422 behavioral trajectories in the three-month period. Since we target the proxy data of those wireless devices to feature the users' indoor interactive behaviors, we only focus our research on the WiFi data recorded in those buildings which are open to public without safeguards for the WiFi users' devices (i.e., when a user leaves such a place, he/she should bring the device with himself/herself.) Therefore, the dataset of 18,715 individuals' 262,109 behavioral trajectories from all six teaching buildings with the WiFi coverage have been employed in the work of this paper.
## Two Public Data Sets Used in the Study {#two-public-data-sets-used-in-the-study .unnumbered}
Two public data sets used in the study are both collected by the RFID technology available at the website of SocioPatterns (http://www.sociopatterns.org), and a related research refers to. The first data set 'HT09' (http://www.sociopatterns.org/datasets/infectious-sociopatterns-dynamic-contact-networks/) was collected during the ACM Hypertext 2009 conference, hosted by the Institute for Scientific Inter-change Foundation in Turin, Italy, from June 29th to July 1st. It involved about 100 conference participants to wear radio badges which monitored around 10,000 face-to-face interactions in the conference period of three days. The next data set 'HGInfectious' (http://www.sociopatterns.org/datasets/hypertext-2009-dynamic-contact-network/) contains more than 230,000 face-to-face contacts among more than 14,000 visitors, which was collected during the art-science exhibition 'INFECTIOUS: STAY AWAY' at the Science Gallery of Dublin, Ireland, from April 17th to July 17th, 2009. These two data sets both have the similar tab-separated lists representing the active contacts during 20-second intervals of the data collection. Each line has the form '\(t\) \(i\) \(j\)', where \(i\) and \(j\) are the anonymous IDs of the persons in contact, and the interval, during which this contact was active, is \([t-20s, t]\). In the study, the two data sets are pre-processed by assembling the continues contacts of the same pair into one interaction, before translating them into the defined event interactions as shown in Figure [\[schematic\]](#schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="schematic"}.
## The Average Spatial Distances of Two Users {#the-average-spatial-distances-of-two-users .unnumbered}
In the campus WiFi system of Fudan University, each WAP can serve around 50 users, which we conjecture it is sufficient to guarantee that every device is served by the closest WAP. Besides, the WAPs in adjacent floors have none overlapped covered regions because the building materials can dramatically attenuate the wireless signals, and each floor can be decomposed by the WAPs into the corresponding Voronoi tessellations. However, it is impossible to precisely locate the position of a user within a Voronoi, and the spatial distance between any two users inside one Voronoi cell can not be directly calculated. Therefore, we propose an approximative method to estimate the average spatial distance of any two users in Voronoi cells (The details see *Text SI*), and Table [\[distance\]](#distance){reference-type="ref" reference="distance"} shows the average spatial distances of any two users and their standard derivation in all involved teaching buildings. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:07:00', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01779', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01779'} |
# Introduction
In the past decade, optical lattice clocks have made dramatic progress in accuracy and stability, surpassing their microwave counterparts to have the lowest fractional uncertainty of any frequency standard to date. Ensuring the continuation of this progress demands that the environmental perturbations affecting their accuracy are characterized to increasingly precise levels. Motivated by this challenge, we report on a new method using highly excited Rydberg states to provide an *in situ* measurement of the DC electric field. Uncharacterized electric fields can severely impact the accuracy of an atomic clock. For the \(5s^2\) \(^1\)S\(_0-5s5p\) \(^3\)P\(_0\) clock transition in strontium, an electric field of 570 V/m yields a DC Stark shift of 1 Hz, or \(2\times10^{-15}\) in fractional units, some three orders of magnitude above the lowest estimated total inaccuracy of a strontium optical lattice clock. Where dielectric surfaces are close to the atoms, shifts as large as 1\(\times 10^{-13}\) have been observed. While steps can be taken to reduce the residual electric field seen by the reference atoms, such as Faraday shielding, or UV discharge of dielectric surfaces, a characterization of the remaining field is necessary. This is typically done by direct spectroscopy of the clock transition with an externally applied electric field. With no residual electric field present, the quadratic nature of the perturbation implies the resulting induced frequency shift should be unchanged if the polarity of the applied field is reversed but the magnitude is left unchanged. However, this method relies on the ability to apply sufficiently large and stable electric fields at the position of the atoms to induce a shift large enough to be quickly resolved during operation of the clock. For metallic vacuum chambers with minimal dielectric openings and no internal electrodes, producing such a shift is problematic. Furthermore, the applied field can charge dielectric materials such as the vacuum viewports, resulting in a time dependence of the effective applied field. We circumvent these challenges by performing *in-situ* electrometry using electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) spectroscopy to measure the quadratic Stark shift of the Sr \(5s75d\) \(^1D_2\) \(m_J = 0,\pm1,\pm2\) Rydberg states. Rydberg states of alkaline earth atoms are of growing interest for applications in quantum information and many body physics , motivating their study by several groups. The low-frequency polarizability scales with principal quantum number \(n\) as \(n^7\), making Rydberg states well suited for AC and DC electrometry, with EIT spectroscopy being a particularly convenient measurement technique. The polarizability of our chosen Rydberg state is eight orders of magnitude larger than that of the clock transition, which reduces the required spectroscopic resolution from sub Hz, as needed when using to clock transition, to MHz when using Rydberg states to achieve the desired level of inaccuracy. It has also been proposed to use Rydberg states to measure ambient black-body radiation which is responsible for the leading systematic uncertainty in many current Sr lattice clocks. Using this spectroscopic method, we reduce the fractional uncertainty of the DC Stark shift of the clock transition to \(2\times10^{-20}\). Furthermore the formation of Rydberg states in a system designed for the operation as an atomic clock opens the possibility to investigate proposals to use long range Rydberg interactions to generate squeezed states which exhibit reduced quantum projection noise.
# Theory: Single electron model and Stark maps {#theory}
Alongside their large polarizability, another key advantage of Rydberg states for precision electrometry is that their Stark map-the variation of energy levels with the applied electric field-may be calculated to a very high degree of accuracy. Even in divalent atoms such as strontium, where inter-electronic Coulomb interactions lead to perturbations of the Rydberg states, it can be shown that accurate wavefunctions, and Stark maps can be obtained without recourse to the complex atomic structure calculations required for the clock states. This simplification occurs because for Rydberg states, the effect of interelectronic interactions occurs primarily through the existence of spatially compact doubly-excited perturber states that overlap in energy with the Rydberg manifold. However since the static polarizability is dominated by the long-range character of the wavefunction, these states do not significantly alter the Stark maps. In previous work we have shown that an effective one-electron treatment that neglects inter-electronic effects gives Stark maps that are agreement with measurements for high-lying strontium Rydberg states. Here we develop this approach to calculate Stark maps with the well-characterized uncertainty necessary to constrain the instability due to the electric field. The method is based on analytic expressions for the wavefunctions and dipole matrix elements generated using the Coulomb approximation. The wavefunction is parametrized by a quantum defect, which is obtained by fitting to the experimentally measured zero-field energies. To obtain the Stark map, Rydberg states within a range of \([n-3,n+5]\) from the target states and with \(l \in [0,15]\) are included in the Stark Hamiltonian, which is then diagonalised numerically for each value of the field. At low electric field, the Stark shift of non-degenerate states is approximately quadratic, and a fit of the form \(\Delta_\mathrm{E} = \frac{1}{2}\alpha_0 E^2\) yields the static polarizability \(\alpha_0\). In Fig.[\[fig:fig1\]](#fig:fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:fig1"}(a) we show an example Stark map compared to experimental measurements taken in an atomic beam apparatus with a well-defined electrode geometry. The data and the model are in quantitative agreement without any adjustable parameters. The predicted Stark map for the higher-lying state used to constrain the field in the lattice clock is shown in Fig.[\[fig:fig1\]](#fig:fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:fig1"}(b). In both cases, the shaded band indicates the theoretical uncertainty in the Stark map. By far the dominant contribution to this uncertainty is the experimental uncertainty in the zero-field energies used to calculate the wavefunctions. In strontium, the current state-of-the-art absolute frequency measurements of Rydberg energy levels is \(\pm30\) MHz for \(S\) and \(D\) states, with measurements on the other series having much greater errors. The zero-field energies for each series and the corresponding errors are obtained by fitting these experimental data with the Rydberg-Ritz formula. The shaded region corresponds to the extremal cases where the 1-sigma errors on each series are combined to give the extremal overall polarizabilities. Using ultracold atoms and frequency comb technology, it was recently shown that absolute Rydberg spectroscopy with 10 kHz uncertainty is possible, opening the way to significant improvement in the Stark map uncertainty.
# Experimental Approach
We follow the standard approach for producing cold strontium samples. We operate a blue magneto-optical trap (MOT) on the 461 nm transition for 650 ms followed by a broadband and single-frequency red MOT for 100 ms and 150 ms, respectively, which results in a sample of approximately \(10^5\) \(^{88}\)Sr atoms at a temperature of around 1 \(\upmu\)K. Details of our apparatus can be found in and. Before implementing the EIT probe pulse, the cloud of atoms is released from the red MOT for 5 ms, giving time for the magnetic field to settle to the desired bias value, and for the atoms to expand ballistically to a lower density which was observed to improve the signal to noise level. For the implementation of the EIT spectroscopy counter-propagating beams, one resonant with the \(5s^2\) \(^1\)S\(_0-5s5p\) \(^1\)P\(_1\) transition at 461 nm and the other with tunable frequency at 413 nm, excite atoms to a chosen 5\(snd\) \(^1\)D\(_2\) Rydberg state. The resulting EIT signal is measured using 'lock in' detection of the 461 nm probe beam absorption via modulation of the 413 nm pump beam intensity by an optical chopper. A typical absorption measurement showing the modulated EIT signal induced by the pump beam is shown in the top of Fig.[\[fig:timetrace\]](#fig:timetrace){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:timetrace"}. The probe beam is derived from a commercial frequency doubled diode laser system. Its power and waist, as defined by the 1/\(e^2\) radius of the intensity profile, are 800 fW and 120 \(\upmu\)m, respectively. At this power and atomic number, the probe beam absorption is between \(20-40\%\). A home built extended-cavity diode laser (ECDL) provides 8 mW of pump light which is focused to an 80 \(\upmu\)m waist at the atoms' position. The bottom inset in Fig.[\[fig:timetrace\]](#fig:timetrace){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:timetrace"} shows typical spectra taken at zero magnetic field with and without the applied external electric field. The long term frequency stability of the pump and probe beam is maintained to within 10 kHz by locking to a transfer cavity referenced to the 'clock' laser. In the case of the probe beam, the sub-harmonic at 922 nm is directly locked to the cavity. To stabilize the 413 nm pump laser frequency, a commercial Ti-sapphire laser, which is typically used to form the magic wavelength lattice at 813 nm, is first tuned to 826 nm and locked to the transfer cavity. This light is then frequency doubled by a LBO crystal [^1] to produce 20 \(\upmu\)W as needed to generate a beat-note with the pump beam. The beat-note signal is mixed with a direct digital synthesiser (DDS) and the intermediate frequency is stabilized using a delay line offset lock scheme via fast feedback to the diode current and slow feedback to the ECDL piezo. The DDS provides the necessary tunability needed for scanning the pump laser frequency. In order to spectroscopically resolve the Zeeman sub-levels of the Rydberg state, an external magnetic field between 100-300 \(\upmu\)T is applied orthogonal to the propagation direction of the pump and probe beams. In this low field regime, the Zeeman splitting of the intermediate \(5s5p\) \(^1\)P\(_1\) state is negligible compared to its natural linewidth. The probe beam is linearly polarised orthogonal to the quantization axis to enable a balanced access to all the \(m_J\) levels within the Rydberg manifold given the fixed polarisation of the pump light. Any background residual magnetic field is nulled using electron-shelving spectroscopy on the narrow-linewidth \(5s^2\) \(^1\)S\(_0-5s5p\) \(^3\)P\(_1\) transition at 689 nm. We resolve a Doppler-broadened linewidth of 40 kHz which constrains any residual field to below 2 \(\upmu\)T. To test the sensitivity of our method, an external plate electrode located directly opposite a radial DN40 viewport is used to apply a DC electric field in order to induce a Stark shift of the Rydberg states. Shielding from the metal vacuum chamber greatly attenuates the applied field at the atoms' position, meaning several kV potentials are needed to induce a substantial Stark shift. Such large potentials have the unfortunate effect of charging the dielectric viewport resulting in an exponential decay of the applied electric field strength at the atoms' position as inferred from a reduction in the Stark shift with time. To ameliorate this effect, we interleave measurements with opposite field polarity to avoid charging any external surfaces.
# Rydberg Electrometry using EIT Spectroscopy
As we do not have a method to directly measure the pump and probe frequencies, we have instead developed a method for measuring the applied electric fields that is based on the relative splitting of spectral lines, rather than the absolute detuning. In the absence of an electric field, the Zeeman sublevels split symmetrically with applied magnetic field ***B***. However, in the presence of an electric field ***E***, the Stark shift will result in an asymmetry in the spectrum, since the Stark shift depends on \(|m_\mathrm{J}|\). Example spectra with and without an applied electric field are shown in Fig.[\[fig:Efit\]](#fig:Efit){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Efit"}. In order to extract the line centers, five Fano profiles are fit to each spectrum corresponding to each of the five possible \(m_J\) transitions. The asymmetric effect of an applied electric field on the observed Zeeman shift of the \(m_\mathrm{J}\) is clearly visible in Fig.[\[fig:Efit\]](#fig:Efit){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Efit"}. To obtain the electric field from the spectroscopic data, the relative line positions are compared to a calculation of the combined Zeeman and Stark shift of each level. In the general case, the magnetic and electric field vectors are separated by an angle \(\beta\), requiring transformation to a common basis. Choosing to work in the \(\ket{J, m}\) basis defined by the magnetic field quantization axis, the matrix elements of the Zeeman Hamiltonian are give by \[\bra{J, m_1}H_B\ket{J,m_2}=-m_1\upmu B \delta_{m_1m_2}\] where \(\mu\), the magnitude of the magnetic dipole moment, is the Bohr magneton for a singlet state and \(\delta\) is the Kronecker delta function. The Stark Hamiltonian, with eigenenergies \(\Delta_E(m_J, E)\) that are computed as outlined in section [2](#theory){reference-type="ref" reference="theory"}, is rotated by an angle \(\beta\) by applying the appropriate Wigner D-matrix, \(d^J_{m,m'}(\beta)\) for \(J\) = 2. The matrix elements of this transformed Hamiltonian are given by \[\bra{J, m_1}H_E\ket{J,m_2}= \sum_{m'} d^J_{m_1,m'}(\beta)d^J_{m_2,m'}(\beta)\Delta_E(m', E)\] Finally, the theoretical splitting is computed by diagonalizing the Hamiltonian \(H = H_{\textrm{E}} + H_{\textrm{B}}\). Using this approach, we fit the experimentally observed energy splitting by varying the electric field strength *E* and its angle \(\beta\) relative to the applied magnetic field in the model. As the Stark shift is quadratic, our method only determines \(\beta\) modulo \(\pi\). The only other fitting parameter is an overall two photon detuning from the zero field resonance as we have no measure of the absolute frequency of the 413 nm laser. Fig.[\[fig:Efit\]](#fig:Efit){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Efit"} shows the relative energy splitting for various magnetic fields with and without an applied electric field. An external electrode set to 2 kV, the maximum allowed by the high voltage supply, generated the applied electric field. From a fit to the Zeeman splitting, the electric field at the position of the atoms is estimated to be \(5.75\pm 0.11(\textrm{stat})\pm 0.16 (\textrm{sys}) \textrm{V} \textrm{m}^{-1}\). The fitting procedure also returned a value of \(\beta = 0.47(1)\pi\) that is consistent with the axial magnetic field and radially applied electric field. An electric field of such magnitude would result in a fractional frequency shift of the clock transition equal to \(2\times10^{-19}\). Given this is the largest field we can apply, it would have taken approximately a year of continuous operation to resolve this frequency shift given our fractional frequency instability, highlighting the utility of this method when applying large external fields is not possible. Next the external field was switched off and the procedure was repeated. A fit to the resulting splitting revealed a residual electric field of \(1.52^{+0.62(\textrm{stat})}_{-.22}\)\(^{+0.05(\textrm{sys})}_{-.03} \textrm{V} \textrm{m}^{-1}\) most likely due to patch potential on the surrounding chamber. The uncertainty for this electric field value is comprised of both statistical error resulting from the fitting procedure and systematic error arising the uncertainty in the Stark map for \(75^1\)D\(_2\). The quoted statistical error corresponds to a \(68\%\) confidence interval as determined by the fitting procedure. A weak correlation observed between the uncertainty in \(\beta\) and the electric field is taken into account in this estimate, see appendix [\[fitting\]](#fitting){reference-type="ref" reference="fitting"} for further details. The systematic error on the electric field value due to the uncertainty for the Rydberg polarizability was calculated by repeating the fitting procedure with revised Stark maps offset from the theoretically predicted value by \(\pm\sigma\). Translating this electric field and corresponding uncertainty to the DC Stark shift of the \(^1\)S\(_0\)-\(^3\)P\(_0\) clock transition results in a fractional frequency shift of \(-1.6^{+0.4}_{-1.6}\times10^{-20}\). The fractional uncertainty of the differential polarizability of the clock states is negligible compared to that of the electric field and therefore has been ignored in the quoted uncertainty.
# Conclusion
In conclusion, we believe that Rydberg electrometry constitutes a valuable technique for controlling systematic errors in optical lattice clocks. DC Stark shifts can in principle be separated from other systematic uncertainties using measurements on the clock transition alone, but this is time-consuming and requires the application of well-characterized external electric fields. In contrast, Rydberg states selectively enhance the spectroscopic sensitivity to stray electric fields by several orders of magnitude. The high spectroscopic resolution provided by EIT thus enables rapid quantitative measurements of the stray electric field. On the practical side, all that is required is a single additional laser to provide the pump beam, and existing lattice clock setups need not be modified to include electrodes. The constraint on the clock uncertainty that we obtained is compatible with the accuracy of the current generation of lattice clocks, and improved spectroscopy of the relevant Rydberg levels would see this reduced to negligible levels. Lastly, we note that the combination of Rydberg states and optical lattice clocks could also be applied to measurements of blackbody-induced systematic errors, and the creation of non-classical states. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-08T02:01:36', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01944', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01944'} |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
## 1. Introduction
The applications of gamma-ray are ubiquitous in our daily life, such as container security initiative, gamma-knife surgery, nuclear medical imaging and food storage. While in the vastness of the universe, photons, ranging from several MeV to tens of TeV, results from various different processes, such as energetic cosmic ray, luminous pulsars and gamma-ray burst. The information of gamma-ray burst was firstly published by the results of Vela satellites and then were quickly verified by data from the Soviet satellites. The ability of cosmic sources to emit such intense gamma-rays indicates that investigating this extreme environment is a promising route to discover new physics which are impossible in earth-bound laboratories. An alternative method of generating violent emission of gamma-rays is through the interaction of petawatt (\(10^{15}\)W) lasers and plasmas in the laboratory. Several multi-PW laser facilities, such as Extreme Light Infrastructure (ELI) and Exawatt Center for Extreme Light Studies (XCELS), are expected to operate at intensities beyond 10\(^{23}\)W/cm\(^{2}\) in next few years. Under \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{23}\)W/cm\(^{2}\), various theoretical schemes have been put forward for multi-MeV photon sources with tens of percent for the total conversion efficiency, such as reinjected electron synchrotron radiation, skin-depth emission, radiation reaction facilitating gamma-ray and sandwich target design. Nevertheless, none of them has the ability to extend the energy of gamma photon up to several GeV, which is highly desirable to explore the laboratory astrophysics. Recently, exploiting the interplay between pair cascades and anomalous radiative trapping, ultrabright GeV photon source can be achieved in laser-dipole waves. However, the scheme of dipole wave field requires multi beams focused into a tiny point symmetrically, which is still an experimental challenge nowadays. Here we report an alternative all-optical scheme to realize the brilliant GeV gamma-ray emission via irradiating only one multi-PW circularly polarized (CP) pulse on a compound target in QED regime. This all optical backscatter scheme is already available in experiment for relative lower intensity circumstance.
## 2. Theoretical model for coupling effect
In the realm of nonlinear QED, electrons are able to emit a huge amount of kinetic energy in the form of high-energy photons \(\gamma_{ph}\), as a result of absorbing a certain number \(n\) of laser photons \(\gamma_l\), \(e^-+ n\gamma_l \rightarrow e^-+ \gamma_{ph}\). The invariant parameters \(\eta=(e\hbar/m_e^3c^4)|F_{\mu\nu}p^\nu|=E_{RF}/E_{Sch}\) and \(\chi=(e\hbar^2/2m_e^3c^4)|F_{\mu\nu}k^\nu|\) characterize the discrete photon emission process, where \(e\) the electron charge, \(m_e\) the electron rest mass, \(\hbar\) the Planck constant, \(c\) the light velocity in vacuum, \(F_{\mu\nu}\) the field tensor and \(p^\nu\) (\(k^\nu\)) the electron's (photon's) four-momentum. \(E_{RF}\) denotes the electric field in the electron's rest frame and \(E_{Sch}=m_e^2c^3/e\hbar\approx1.3\times10^{18}Vm^{-1}\) is the characteristic field of Schwinger limit. When \(\eta\lesssim1\):(1) The radiation process should be described by probabilistic quantum emission rather than continuous one. (2) The corresponding quantum weaken correction for radiation is inevitable. When an electron beam co-propagates with the laser pulse, the electric force offset by the magnetic field effect results in \(\eta\approx0\), which is undesired for high-energy photon emission. However, if the laser counter-propagates with the electron beam, it leads to an enhancement as \(\eta\approx 2\gamma E_L/E_{Sch}\), where \(\gamma\) is the relativistic Lorentz factor of electron and \(E_L\) is the polarized laser field. This colliding configuration can not only lower down the threshold of QED cascade from seed electrons, but also facilitate the generation of \(\gamma\)-ray explosion and pair plasma. To exploit the counter-propagating configuration, in this letter, a CP femtosecond pulse was irradiated on a compound target (in Fig.[\[fig_schematic\]](#fig_schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_schematic"}) consisted of a near-critical-density (NCD) plasma slab and a solid foil. Here the solid foil plays the role as a plasma mirror to spontaneously reflect the driven light to trigger the subsequent Compton backscattering. Generally, when a CP pulse of 10\(^{19-21}\)W/cm\(^{2}\) propagates in the NCD target, the ionized electrons can be transversely expelled from central area to form a plasma channel. Some injected electron can experience a direct laser acceleration process and a collimated energetic electron bunch can be produced when its oscillation frequency in the channel field is close to the light frequency witnessed by the electron. However, under the higher intensity of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{23}\)W/cm\(^{2}\), the injected electrons are mostly expelled from the central region and a hollow channel is merely filled with laser radiation. More interestingly, a great amount of electrons will be trapped back into the channel if radiation reaction (RR) is taken into account, where transverse ponderomotive force is properly balanced by the radiation recoil. It should be noted that the interaction between laser and NCD plasma is very complicated, where the filamentation instability, hosing instability or non optimal laser-plasma matching can destroy the laser propagating and the channel's shape. Here a relatively large spot radius and the small plasma density are adopted to avoid these detrimental influence and guarantee the stable channel. To understand the underlying mechanism of RR impact on this scheme, the single electron model is utilized to depict the interaction with laser transverse field \(E_L\) and self-generated fields in the plasma channel. Based on previous work, self-generated fields in the channel include radial electrostatic field \(\mathbf{E}_{Sr}=k_Er\hat{e}_r\), longitudinal electric field \(\mathbf{E}_{S\parallel}\) and quasistatic azimuthal magnetic field \(\mathbf{B}_{S\theta}=-k_Br\hat{e}_\theta\), where \(k_E\) and \(k_B\) can be seen as constant and are related to the plasma density. The time derivative of the ponderomotive phase \(\psi\) can be written as \[\begin{aligned}\label{eq1} \frac{d\psi}{dt}=\omega_{\beta}-\omega_L=\sqrt{\frac{e}{\gamma m_e}(v_\parallel \langle k_B\rangle+\langle k_E\rangle)}-(1-v_\parallel/v_{ph})\omega_0. \end{aligned}\] Here \(\omega_{\beta}=\sqrt{e(v_\parallel k_B+k_E)/(\gamma m_e)}\) is the electron betatron frequency and \(v_\parallel\) (\(v_\perp\)) the electron longitudinal (transverse) velocity. \(\omega_L=(1-v_\parallel/v_{ph})\omega_0\) is the Doppler-shifted laser frequency witnessed by electron, where \(\omega_0\) is the laser frequency and \(v_{ph}=c/\sqrt{1-\omega_p^2/(\gamma\omega_0^2)}\) is the laser phase velocity. \(\omega_p\) is the plasma frequency. The \(\psi\) is relative phase between the electron rotation and the periodic laser field. The time derivative of the electron Lorentz factor is expressed as \[\begin{aligned}\label{eq2} \frac{d\gamma}{dt}=\frac{-e\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{v}-\mathbf{f_{rad}}\cdot\mathbf{v}}{m_ec^2}=-\frac{e( v_\perp E_L cos\psi+v_\parallel \langle E_\parallel\rangle)}{m_ec^2}-\epsilon_{rad}\omega_0\beta^2a_s^2\eta^2G(\eta). \end{aligned}\] Here \(E_L\) is the light electric field amplitude. Since the stochasticity of photon emission is difficult to be simplified into a precise formula, the discontinuous influence is neglected in the single model and the quantum corrected RR force \(\textbf{f}_{rad}\approx-G(\eta)\epsilon_{rad}m_ec\omega_0\vec{\beta}a_{s}^2\eta^2\) is used in Eq.([\[eq2\]](#eq2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq2"}) to qualitatively analyze the RR influences, where \(G(\eta)\approx(1+12\eta+31\eta^2+3.7\eta^3)^{-4/9}\) is the quantum weaken factor. The impacts issued from the discrete stochasticity in RR is beyond the scope of this manuscript and these are worth discussing in the future work. \(\epsilon_{rad}=4\pi r_e/3\lambda_0\) is the dimensionless ratio, where \(r_e=e^2/m_ec^2\approx2.8\times10^{-15}m\) is the classical electron radius and \(\lambda_0\) is the laser wavelength. \(\vec{\beta}=\vec{v}/c\) is the normalized electron velocity and \(a_{s}=eE_{Sch}/m_e\omega_0c\) is the normalized Schwinger field. The parameters in above equations depend on time and are probably in especially complicated form so that the average values denoted by \(\langle\ \rangle\) are used. From Eqs.(1)-(2), it can be found that the phase space (\(\psi\),\(\gamma\)) has a fixed point at (\(\psi_0\),\(\gamma_0\)) = (\(\cos^{-1}\frac{-\epsilon_{rad}\omega_0\beta^2a_s^2\eta^2G(\eta)m_ec^2-e v_\parallel \langle E_\parallel\rangle}{e v_\perp E_L},\frac{e(v_\parallel \langle k_B\rangle+\langle k_E\rangle)}{m_e(1-v_\parallel/v_{ph})^2\omega_0^2}\)). To determine the system dynamic property from Eqs.(1)-(2) in (\(\psi\),\(\gamma\)) space, the perturbation expansion nearby (\(\psi_0\),\(\gamma_0\)) of Eqs.(1)-(2) was made and quadratic terms were dropped to approach the characteristic Jacobian matrix \(\mathbf{Ja}\): \[\begin{aligned} \mathbf{Ja}\approx\begin{pmatrix} 0 &-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{e}{\gamma^3m_e}(v_\parallel \langle k_B\rangle+\langle k_E\rangle)} \\ ev_\perp E_Lsin\psi &-\epsilon_{rad}m_ec^2\omega_0\beta^2a_{s}^2\frac{\partial G(\eta)\eta^2}{\partial\gamma} \end{pmatrix}_{\psi_0,\gamma_0}. \end{aligned} \label{eq3}\] Without RR effect, the trace and determinant of Jacobian matrix are tr(Ja)\(=\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0 and det(Ja)\(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0 when the right lower RR term is canceled, which manifests that (\(\psi_0\),\(\gamma_0\)) is a center without any source or sink property. On the contrary, with RR effect included, at fixed point tr(Ja)\(<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0 and det(Ja)\(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0 indicates that its behaviour converts from center to spiral sink attractor. The sink attractor emerging illustrates a large fraction of the radiation trapped electrons tends to possess the same relative phase \(\psi_0\) with respect to laser electric field and the helical density structure is an intrinsic rotary manner of the electric field of CP laser. Due to electron moving in the same direction as the pulse, the electric field \(E_L\) counteracts the force from laser magnetic field \(B_L\) leading to \(\eta\approx\gamma|\mathbf{E}_L+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}_L|/E_{Sch}\approx0\) and tr(Ja)\(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0. Notwithstanding, the strong self-generated magnetic field \(B_{s\theta}\approx n_eR/(2\varepsilon_0c)\) (here \(\varepsilon_0\) the permittivity of vacuum, \(n_e\) the RR trapped electron density and \(R\) the channel radius) approaching the order of driven laser field gives \(\eta\approx\gamma|\mathbf{E}_L+\mathbf{v}\times(\mathbf{B}_L+\mathbf{B}_{s\theta})|/E_{Sch}\approx\frac{\gamma B_{s\theta}}{E_{Sch}}\), which results in tr(Ja)\(\approx-2\epsilon_{rad}\beta^2e^2B_{s\theta}^2/m_e\omega_0<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0 and enables the attractor effect on achieving such a helical electron bunch (HEB). The nearby electrons are attracted to possess the identical Lorentz factor \(\gamma_0\)=\(e(v_\parallel \langle k_B\rangle+\langle k_E\rangle)/m_e(1-v_\parallel/v_{ph})^2\omega_0^2\). The total angular momentum (AM) along the longitudinal x-axis, i.e. \(L=yp_z-zp_y\), acquired by the HEB can also be estimated as \[{\centering \ L \approx-\int\Sigma_{i}er_\perp E_Lcos\psi_idt \ \ \ i=1,2,3... } \label{eq4}\] here r\(_{\perp}\) is the electron transverse radius and the index i refers to the i-th electron. From Eq.(4) we can see that the laser could transfer its spin angular momentum (SAM) to HEB only when most of electrons possess the same ponderomotive phase \(\psi_i\), otherwise ensemble average leads to \(\sum_{i}cos\psi_i\approx\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0. Therefore, coupling effects among RR trapping, self-generated magnetic field and spiral attractor in phase space, enhance the net AM gain and realize the HEB. Eventually the discrete photon emission is triggered through the inverse Compton scattering (ICS) between the HEB and reflected light, where prolific high-energy photons inheriting a large fraction of electrons' energy and AM are generated.
## 3. Particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation results
The feasibility and robustness of this scheme are demonstrated by using the self-consistent three dimension PIC code EPOCH. A Monte Carlo probabilistic model has been successfully implemented, which is based on QED corrected synchrotron cross sections and coupled with the subsequent reduction of the electron momentum. Each particle is assigned an optical depth (\(\tau\)) at which it emits according to \(P=1-e^{-\tau}\), where \(P\in\)\[0,1\] is chosen at random to consider the quantum correction in the emission processes as well as the straggling. The rates of photon production, \(d\tau_\gamma/dt=(\sqrt{3}\alpha_fc\eta)/(\lambda_c\gamma)\int_{0}^{\eta/2}d\chi F(\eta,\chi)/\chi\), are then solved until the optical depth is reached, when the emission event occurs. Here, \(\alpha_{fc}\) is the fine structure constant, \(\lambda_c=\hbar/(m_ec)\approx3.9\times10^{-13}m\) is the Compton wavelength and \(F(\eta,\chi)\) is the quantum synchrotron spectrum. The incident 1.2\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{23}\)W/cm\(^{2}\) CP pulse propagates along X direction with a profile of \(a\)=\(a_0e^{-(t-t_0)^4/\tau_0^4}e^{-(y^2+z^2)/r_0^2}sin(\omega_0t)\), where \(\tau_0\)=\(5T_0\) denotes the intensity with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 25.6fs (T\(_0\[\approx\)`<!-- -->`{=html}3.3fs is the laser period) and \(a_0\)=\(eE_L/m_e\omega_0c\]\approx\[300\) is the normalized amplitude of the laser field. \(r_0\)=\(5\lambda_0\) is the spot size (\(\lambda_0\)=1.0\(\mu m\)). The simulation box is 80\(\lambda_0 \times\) 40\(\lambda_0 \times\) 40\(\lambda_0\) in X \(\times\) Y \(\times\) Z direction, which has been uniformly divided into 3200 \(\times\) 800 \(\times\) 800 cells. A hydrogen slab with initial density of \(n_e=2n_c\) locates between 10\(\lambda_0\) to 60\(\lambda_0\) and aluminum foil of \(n_e=700n_c\) is placed from 60\(\lambda_0\) to 80\(\lambda_0\), where \(n_c=m_e\omega_0^2/4\pi e^2\) is critical density. The hydrogen slab and aluminum foil contain 4 and 16 macroparticles per cell (for both species), respectively. For reference, there is no obvious difference in our results when we double the number of macroparticle per cell. The electron density distributions in \(\gamma-\psi\) space at t=50T\(_0\) for the cases with and without RR are presented in Fig.[\[fig_attractor\]](#fig_attractor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_attractor"}(a) and (b). Lorentz factor at the fixed point obtained from Eqs.(1)-(2) as \(\gamma_0=\frac{e(v_\parallel\langle k_B\rangle+\langle k_E\rangle)}{m_e(1-v_{\parallel}/v_{ph})^2\omega_0^2}\approx\frac{(v_\parallel/c)(n_e/n_c)}{2[1-v_\parallel/c\sqrt{1-n_e/(a_0n_c)}]^2}\) where \(\langle k_B\rangle\approx\frac{en_e}{2\epsilon_0}\),\(\omega_0=\sqrt{\frac{n_ce^2}{\epsilon_0m_e}}\) and \(v_{ph}\simeq\frac{c}{\sqrt{1-n_e/(a_0n_c)}}\) are taken into account and \(\langle k_E\rangle\) is neglected as the transverse static electric field is relatively weak compared with self-generated magnetic field. Substituting \(n_e=2n_c\), \(a_0=300\) and \(v_\parallel=0.9863c\) (from simulation parameters and results) into above equation leads to \(\gamma_0=3416\). Considering \(\epsilon_{rad}=1.18\times10^{-8}(\frac{1\mu m}{\lambda_0})\), \(\beta\approx1\), \(a_s\approx4.1\times10^5\), \(\eta\approx\frac{\gamma_0B_{s\theta}}{a_s}\approx0.165\), \(G(\eta)\approx1\), \(\langle E_\parallel\rangle\approx0.015E_L\) and \(v_\perp=0.165c\), the relative phase is deduced as \(\psi_0=\arccos\frac{-\epsilon_{rad}\omega_0\beta^2a_s^2\eta^2G(\eta)m_ec^2-ev_\parallel\langle E_\parallel\rangle}{ev_\perp E_L}\approx2.24\). When RR force is switched on, most of electrons possess a relative phase \(\psi\)=2.3 in Fig.[\[fig_attractor\]](#fig_attractor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_attractor"}(b) which is in good agreement with our theoretically derived attractor point (\(\psi_0, \gamma_0\))=(2.24, 3416). Since neither RR trapping nor attractor emerging occurs, the number density of electron in Fig.[\[fig_attractor\]](#fig_attractor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_attractor"}(a) is relatively small compared to RR case and it does not behave like the attractor modulated distribution. The self-generated azimuthal magnetic field B\(_{s\theta}\) averaged over the channel cross plane z=0 is plotted in Fig.[\[fig_attractor\]](#fig_attractor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_attractor"}(c) with maximum \(\approx\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.6MT (normalized value equals 60\(m_e\omega_0/e\approx\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.2B\(_L\), where B\(_L\) is the laser magnetic amplitude) at t=65T\(_0\), which demonstrates that RR recoil enhances the \(B_{s\theta}\) generation due to the more trapped electron current along longitudinal axis. This kind of self-generated magnetic field in channel can not only enhance the gamma photon emission, but also help accelerate ions in the rear surface of target, which has already been verified in experiment under lower laser intensity with shock-compressed gas target. The temporal evolution of electron number inside the plasma channel and their total AM \(L=\sum_i y_ip_{zi}-z_ip_{yi}\) are recorded in Fig.[\[fig_attractor\]](#fig_attractor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_attractor"}(d) for both cases. It is found that RR not only boosts the electron accumulation inside the channel but also facilitates the AM transfer to HEB, which is in good agreement with the theoretical prediction of Eq.(4). The RR force prevents electrons from being expelled transversely, resulting in a increase of electrons from 172 nano-Coulombs(nC) to 291 nC at t=65T\(_0\). The enhancement of electron current strengthens the B\(_{s\theta}\), which gives a positive feedback on spiral attractor merging in phase space and effectively favors angular momentum transformation from laser's SAM to HEB's AM. The electron density distributions for the case with and without RR are shown in Fig.3(a)(b). Here the emergence of helical spatial structure depends on the RR impact, which accords with the attractor facilitating electron density modulation with the similar frequency as laser electric field in Eq.([\[eq3\]](#eq3){reference-type="ref" reference="eq3"}). When RR is switched off, a ball of electrons are injected into the tail of plasma channel and can be accelerated by the longitudinal electric field \(E_x\). The distributions of \(E_x\) are plotted in Fig.[\[fig_insert\]](#fig_insert){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_insert"}(c)(d) for with RR case or not. Since the quantity of electron in the channel for RR case is much higher than that for no RR, the sheild effect weakens the accelerating field in RR case when compared to the no RR one. Since the ponderomotive force of CP pulse avoids the longitudinal oscillation at twice the optical frequency, plasma in the second layer cannot be heated violently and the driven light is substantially reflected. Under colliding configuration, the parameter \(\eta\approx2\gamma E_L/E_{Sch}\gtrsim1\) indicates that the discrete incoherent photon emission gives a more appropriate description compared with the coherent electromagnetic wave radiation derived from the Liénard-Wiechert retarded potential. The volume snapshot of the photon energy density at t=70T\(_0\) is exhibited in Fig.[\[fig_photon\]](#fig_photon){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_photon"}(a) where photon beam inherits spatial helical structure and transverse size of the source is about 1.5\(\mu\)m. The gamma-ray flash duration is \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}16fs roughly equal to half of the laser because the driven pulse and trapped electrons completely overlap inside the channel. The angular-spectral distribution calculated by accumulating the forward photons at t=70T\(_0\) over the entire simulation region is shown in Figs.[\[fig_photon\]](#fig_photon){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_photon"}(b) and (c). Most of energetic photons are highly collimated and predominantly located within an emission polar angle \(\phi\leq\)`<!-- -->`{=html}15\(^\circ\) (\(\phi\leq\)`<!-- -->`{=html}30\(^\circ\)) for energies higher than 1GeV (100MeV). In a 0.1% bandwidth (BW) around 1GeV we have 1.05\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^8\) photons, implying the brightness of 1.7\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{23}\) photons/s/mm\(^2\)/mrad\(^2\)/0.1%BW for the GeV gamma-ray emission. The corresponding source brilliances at 100 MeV and 10 MeV are 2.3\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{24}\) and 1.5\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{25}\) photons/s/mm\(^2\)/mrad\(^2\)/0.1%BW, respectively. The comparasion among different photon source is illustrated in Fig.[\[fig_brill\]](#fig_brill){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_brill"}. Our ICS scheme predominantly aims at high brilliance around GeV. Another dipole wave field can achieve the brightest gamma photon emission with 9\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{24}\) photons/s/mm\(^2\)/mrad\(^2\)/0.1%BW at GeV, but the dipole wave needs to be realized through symmetrically colliding multi pulses, which is still a challenge in experiment. Here our scheme shooting one laser pulse onto double layer target is the most efficient method to generate brilliant GeV gamma ray source and it is more experimentally accessible.
## 4. Discussion and conclusion
In Fig.[\[fig_discussion\]](#fig_discussion){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_discussion"}(a), the exponential decay spectrum of photon covers higher energy range from 1MeV to several GeV with a cutoff energy at 2.9GeV and that of the electron before(t=60T\(_0\)) and after(t=70T\(_0\)) ICS process are presented. The nonlinear QED regime predicts that most photons are emitted with an energy \(h\nu_{ph}\approx\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.44\(\eta\gamma m_ec^2\) which carries a large fraction of electron's kinetic energy. It is obvious that the amount of high-energy electron is drastically curtailed with the cutoff-energy declining from 3.9GeV to 2.5GeV and simultaneously most of energy is converted to gamma photons. The temporal evolutions of the particle energy are illustrated in Fig.[\[fig_discussion\]](#fig_discussion){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_discussion"}(b), where 14.5%;4.2%;0.108% of the total laser energy is transferred into the gamma-ray photon with energy above 1MeV;100MeV;1GeV. For energies above 100MeV and 1GeV, the photons are emitted almost exclusively by ICS process during 65T\(_0<\)t\(<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}70T\(_0\). Based on power radiated by a single electron, \(P_{rad}=(4\pi m_ec^3/3\lambda_c)\alpha_fc\eta^2G(\eta)\), the instantaneous radiation power of this regime can be estimated as \]{\centering P_{rad}\approx\left\{ \begin{aligned} N_e\frac{4\pi\alpha_fm_ec^3}{3\lambda_c}(\frac{\gamma B_{s\theta}}{E_{Sch}})^2G(\frac{\gamma B_{s\theta}}{E_{Sch}}) &\ \ \ & t<t_{ref}, \\ N_e\frac{4\pi\alpha_fm_ec^3}{3\lambda_c}(\frac{2\gamma E_L}{E_{Sch}})^2G(\frac{2\gamma E_L}{E_{Sch}}) &\ \ \ & t\geq t_{ref}. \end{aligned} \right. } \label{eq5}\(\) Here t\(_{ref}\)=65T\(_0\) is the time of light reflecting and \(\eta\) is approximated by \(\gamma B_{s\theta}/E_{Sch}\) at \(t<t_{ref}\) and \(2\gamma E_L/E_{Sch}\) at \(t\geq t_{ref}\), respectively. The length of NCD plasma \(l=50\mu m\) is not comparable with the laser depletion length \(L_{depletion}\approx c\tau_0a_0n_c/n_e\)=750\(\mu m\), as a result a large part of laser energy is reflected and backscatter with the electron bunch. In addition, when laser propagates in the NCD plasma, both of its intensity and spot size will change due to the self-focusing, self-modulation, etc. The radius of the self-generated channel is defined by the balance of the ponderomotive and charge separation fields. Here, we choose the laser spot almost the same as the radius of such channel. That results in no significant change of the laser transverse size during the propagation in near critical plasma and we assume they are constant in estimation of Eq.(5). Eq.(5) predicts the radiation power P\(_{rad}\approx\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.63PW (t\(<\)t\(_{ref}\)) and P\(_{rad}\approx\)`<!-- -->`{=html}19.2PW (t\(\geq\)t\(_{ref}\)) which qualitatively agrees with the simulation results in Fig.[\[fig_discussion\]](#fig_discussion){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_discussion"}(b), implying the nonlinear QED ICS based gamma-ray source power of the same order as the infrared incident laser. The transfer of axial AM from the laser to the particles is plotted in Fig.[\[fig_discussion\]](#fig_discussion){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_discussion"}(c). The oscillation of electron and proton AM is due to charged particles interplaying with the laser electromagnetic field. The different sign of electric charge causes the opposite oscillation direction in electron and proton. Since the spiral attractor results in the fixed relative phase between electron velocity and laser electric field, the overall AM of electron rises gradually before backscattering with the reflected pulse. However, photons do not interplay with laser field and their AM has a moderate growth before the ICS. The photons are predominantly emitted from electron modulated by the spiral attractor during 65T\(_0<\)t\(<\)`<!-- -->`{=html}70T\(_0\) so that a sharp photon AM increase and a pronounced electron AM drop occur in ICS process. In terms of quantum mechanics, the angular momentum carried by a photon of CP laser is \(\sigma=\pm1\) for spin motion. The total angular momentum absorbed from laser is approximately expressed as \(L_{l}=\delta\frac{W_{l}}{\hbar\omega_0}\sigma\hbar\)=1.70\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-12}\delta\) kg\(\ast\)m\(^2\)/s, where \(W_{l}\) is the whole laser energy and \(\delta\) is the absorbing ratio. During ICS process, AM is more efficiently transferred from electron to gamma-ray and eventually the AM of photons reaches 8.2\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-14}\) kg\(\ast\)m\(^2\)/s, 4.8% of the total laser SAM. In addition, a parameter scan has been carried out to investigate energy conversion efficiency for a wide range density 0.2-20n\(_c\) of first layer plasma with thickness of 50\(\mu\)m in Fig.[\[fig_discussion\]](#fig_discussion){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_discussion"}(d) and find that there is an optimal condition \(n_e\sim n_c\) for realizing the twisted GeV gamma-ray emission. The disadvantage for relatively rarefied plasma (n\(_e\)=0.2n\(_c\)) is lack in trapped helical electron amount so that insufficient electron quantity accounts for deficient gamma-ray production, while for relatively dense circumstance (n\(_e\gtrsim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10n\(_c\)) driven laser tends to deplete most of their energy in the first slab and without any remnants to trigger ICS process. In conclusion, we have shown how the ultra-intense and ultra-bright GeV gamma-ray flash can be achieved by irradiating a prospective 1.2\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{23}\)W/cm\(^{2}\) laser on a compound plasma target in nonlinear QED regime. The initial energetic HEB results from the coupling effects among RR trapping, self-generated magnetic field and emergency of spiral attractor in \(\gamma\)-\(\psi\) space. The helical gamma-ray flash inherits a considerable AM and energy of the parent electron beam through Compton backscattering between HEB and the reflected driven pulse. The final photon source, with unprecedented power of 20 PW and brightness of 1.7\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{23}\) photons/s/mm\(^2\)/mrad\(^2\)/0.1% (at 1 GeV), might enable significant development of application in particles physics and laboratory astrophysics. Our scheme is also feasible in the laboratory system where cluster jets or nano-tube foams can be utilized for NCD plasma generation and a solid foil acts as a plasma mirror to reflect laser. Such parameters of the gamma-ray sources will be achieved with the next generation of multi-PW laser facilities in the future. | {'timestamp': '2018-01-23T02:16:33', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01615', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01615'} |
# Introduction
Data analyses of LHC data consist of workflows that utilize a diverse set of software tools to produce physics results. The tools range from large software frameworks like Gaudi to single-purpose scripts written by individual analyzers or analysis teams. The analysis steps that lead to a particular physics result are often not reproducible without significant assistance from the original authors. This severely limits the capability to re-execute the original analysis or to re-use its analysis procedures in new contexts. An important application for such re-use is the systematic re-interpretation of a given analysis with respect to alternative models of new physics. Therefore, it is desirable to have a system to archive analysis code as well as the analysis procedure in a manner, that enables both re-execution and re-use. This document presents work on workflow capture that addresses these issues in a platform and language-agnostic manner.
## Short anatomy of analysis workflows
The driving paradigm of LHC analyses is the selection of events within the experiments' dataset and, typically, comparing those events to expectations derived using both data-driven techniques and Monte-Carlo simulations. Since every collision event (whether real or simulated) is independent of the others, the data analysis problem becomes *embarrassingly parallel*. Consequently, the most common task in a LHC analysis is the parallel processing of events by algorithms that transform the event data into higher-level representations (e.g. from raw detector data to reconstructed 'analysis objects') or perform event selection or otherwise reduce the dataset size, for example by selectively storing only partial event information ('thinning'). The main reconstruction transformations are often handled either on a collaboration-wide or physics working group level and use centrally managed and documented code with fixed release schedules and procedures. Transform configurations, such as the used executable and its command line options, are managed centrally as well (e.g. with databases such as AMI). Therefore, these operations are comparatively easy to preserve and reproduce. On the other hand, custom code developed by the end-user analysis team is often much harder to reproduce due to the diversity of tools, workflows and computing environments that are used by an individual analysis team. In the case of the ATLAS experiment, a very wide spectrum of analysis frameworks have been used during Run-1 to analyze events in the "post-AOD" stage, i.e. after central reconstruction. This ranged from large and complex frameworks such as `SFrame` or `Athena`, handling not only the main event-loop, but also managing calibration tool instantiation and data-handling, to pure ROOT-based programs such as `TTree::MakeClass`-and `TTree::MakeSelector`-based codes. Since Run-2, ATLAS has seen a increasing level of homogenization in analysis codes, where many groups use one of two high-level analysis frameworks within which they develop the custom routines needed for the analysis at hand. Once all data (real and simulated) is sufficiently reduced, usually a statistical analysis is performed, in which the observed data is compared to the expectations given by the physics model under study. Here, a range of statistics packages such as HistFitter and HistFactory or loosely-structured scripts, that utilize RooFit/RooStats directly, is used to extract the relevant physics results such as interval estimates on model parameters. This can include precision measurements of Standard Model observables or exclusion limits on parameters of models of physics beyond the Standard Model.
## Analysis preservation for re-use
In the context of analysis preservation, the entire analysis can viewed as an abstract function that maps data and the model hypothesis to the analysis results: \[\textrm{result} = f_{\textrm{analysis}}(\textrm{data}, \textrm{model})\] Ideally, one would like to preserve this map in a completely parametrized form, \(f_\mathrm{analysis}(\cdot,\cdot)\) independent of the specific data and model on which it has been applied to obtain the result at hand. Realistically, however, the analysis is tightly coupled to the recorded data it was developed against, due to various reasons such as file formats and re-processing versions. The model-dependence, on the other hand, can often times be factored out more easily, especially for analyses that search for physics phenomena beyond the Standard Model, where the Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) contribution is estimated separately from the Standard Model backgrounds. An analysis preservation approach that is designed to be model-independent would thus enable both re-interpretation and statistical combinations of multiple analyses after the initial publication. In order for such to achieve such a parametrized preservation, two separate types of information need to be captured:
1. a descriptions of the individual parametrized analysis steps such as event selection steps or the subsequent statistical analysis
2. a description of the workflow that logically links these individual steps in order to arrive at the analysis result data
In this document we introduce schemas to capture this information in flat JSON data as well as a framework to read back that information and re-execute such a preserved analysis.
# Capturing parametrized activities
An appropriate model to capture the different steps of an analysis is the data model employed by the W3C PROV standard, in which the basic ingredients are *entities* and *activities* to track data provenance. Activities act on existing entities and generate new ones. In the context of an HEP analysis, an entity is often a set of files (such as a dataset) or a data product derived from them, while an activity is most often the execution of a piece of software that takes entities (i.e. data) as input and generates new entities as outputs, e.g. by writing a new set of files. These operations can be parametrized by a few variables such that the activity appears as a function of the parameters \(p_1,p_2,\cdots,p_n\) and some notion of an input state \(\sigma\) (this could for example be a filesystem directory), which may be modified as a side-effect of the function. \[\mathrm{output} = f_{\mathrm{step}}(p_1,p_2,\cdots,p_n, \sigma), \label{eq:singlestep}\] It is useful to partition the return value of this function into a tuple of an output state after processing \(\sigma'\) and a separate record of human-and machine-readable *result data*, \(\mathbf{r}\), that provides additional machine-readable data, possibly describing the side effects such as filesystem paths of files generated during this step. This separation allows for a convenient definition of workflows later on, as each step identifies and publishes the relevant data fragments (i.e. entities) it produces. \[(\mathbf{r},\sigma') = f_{\mathrm{step}}(\mathbf{p}, \sigma), \label{eq:singlestep_v2}\] An activity is thus an abstract interface that transforms parameters into result data while modifying an external state. As an interchange format for both the input parameters \(\mathbf{p}\) and result data \(\mathbf{r}\) JSON is a suitable choice. The information required to fully capture such parametrized activities may be partitioned into three basic pieces:
process
: a parametrized description with which one can produce a fully-defined activity description--the ("job")--based on concrete parameters (such as a templated command line)
*environment*
: a description of the environment in which this job is to be executed. This may for example include a description of the necessary software to run the above process
publisher
: a description of how to extract the relevant information or data fragments subsequent to the execution of the job
. For each of these pieces, multiple concrete implementations are possible. Irrespective of the implementation, the basic procedure for execution (given some execution backend) is shown in algorithm [\[alg:packtivity\]](#alg:packtivity){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:packtivity"}.\
## Packtivity
To capture such 'packaged activities'--or 'packtivities'--a extensible set of JSON schemas have been developed to describe the three interfaces--process, environment, publisher--identified in the previous section. The choice is motivated by the simplicity and ubiquity of the JSON format, which makes it suitable for long-term and implementation-independent archival. Sub-schemas will generally be identified by a interface-wide 'property' but implementation specific 'property value'. An examples of full packtivity definitions are provided in listing [\[mnt:fullpacktivity\]](#mnt:fullpacktivity){reference-type="ref" reference="mnt:fullpacktivity"}. A number of JSON schemas are collected under the `yadage-schemas` package available at GitHub and via PyPI
### Process descriptions
A form of capturing parametrized process information, that is accessible and convenient for analysis teams to produce, are templated string of multi-line scripts or single-line command lines from which concrete job manifests are formed by interpolating these strings based on input parameters provided as JSON documents. In the example shown in listing [\[mnt:fullpacktivity\]](#mnt:fullpacktivity){reference-type="ref" reference="mnt:fullpacktivity"}, the process has five replacement fields that need to be provided by the input JSON document, for example by having a top-level object with appropriately named properties.
### Environment descriptions
Describing the software environment or run-time that the job formed by the 'process' requires is a trade-off between completeness and convenience and could range from specifying merely a specific software release number to a full virtual machine image that includes both hardware and software virtualization. In practice, using Linux container technologies such as Docker have proven to be a useful middle-ground. In HEP contexts, a large amount of software is installed centrally in the global, read-only filesystem CVMFS, thus it may not be feasible for all application to provide a standalone CVMFS-independent installation. However, as CVMFS is a versioned filesystem, in principle it is possible to mount it at the version that the original analysis executed against. Similarly, some applications may require additional run-time data such as secrets used for VO authentication. Generally, the number of such external dependencies should be kept at a minimum for preservation purposes.
### Publisher descriptions
The execution of the process in a given environment typically results in the modification of an external state which may, for example, be provided by mounting an external shared filesystem such as CephFS into the containers. However in order to describe multi-step analysis workflows, it is necessary to have a semantic description of what the relevant data fragments of this activity are. As laid out in the previous section, JSON is a suitable format. The processes themselves do not necessarily produce JSON data, so that it is helpful to include the notion of an external 'publishing manifest' into the packtivity definition, that a implementation can use in order to to derive a JSON object. Often, the result JSON data can be derived by simple inspection of the input parameters such as in listing [\[mnt:fullpacktivity\]](#mnt:fullpacktivity){reference-type="ref" reference="mnt:fullpacktivity"}. In this case it suffices to provide a mapping from input parameters to output keys. In other scenarios the result data may only be fully formed after the process execution, for example if the process generates a dynamic number of files that all need to be published. In this case other publishers may be defined, such as using glob patterns or regular expressions.
# Parametrized workflow model
The packaging of the individual processing activities captures a lot of the information needed to re-produce or re-use a given analysis. The command line interface or the language bindings can be used in code to execute pre-packaged activities in a suitable order. It is, however, desirable to capture this workflow logic in a similarly declarative fashion as the packtivities themselves, such that its execution may be automated. A suitable data model for the description of workflows is the directed acyclic graph (DAG). In such a graph, nodes represent individual activities, while directed edges denote dependency relations of activities. This allows to capture non-linear workflows and enables the distribution and orchestration of analysis workflows across distributed systems. As noted, for re-use applications, it is important that the workflows are parametrized. This may in turn introduce some parameter-dependency on not only the parameters for individual packtivities, but also the topology of the workflow graph. A number of DAG-based workflow systems such as DAGMan or the Common Workflow Language exist, however those tools introduce limitations that hinder the definition of workflow in those parameter-dependent scenarios. Therefore, a number an extensible workflow definition system has been developed that grants first-class status to parametrized DAGs.
## Workflow stages
The central tenet of parametrized and dynamic workflows is that, instead of archiving DAG descriptions that fully fix the topology, one should rather store sufficient information into a *workflow template* \(T\), from which it is possible construct these DAGs--*workflow instances* \(W\)--during run-time once sufficient information (such as parameter values) is available. As such, the workflow template T is made up from a set of *workflow stages* \(s_i\) and \(T = \{s_1,s_2\dots s_n\}\). A stage represents a piece logic that add nodes and edges to the instance DAG. The time at which this operation may be applied can be dependent on the state of the instance. For example it may require that some node within the instance graph has already been processed by a backend and its result data is known. Therefore a stage is defined by two pieces of information
- a definition of dependencies which the workflow instance \(W\) must fulfill for the stage to be applicable. This is conveniently expressed as a DAG-valued *predicate function* \(d: W\to \{\mathrm{true},\mathrm{false}\}\)
- a DAG-valued function that, given a workflow instance, returns an updated workflow instance with additional nodes and edges or newly defined stages. This may be expressed as a DAG-valued *scheduler function* \(f: W\to W'\)
In order to process a parametrized workflow defined by such a template, a simple algorithm, shown in algorithm [\[alg:adage\]](#alg:adage){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:adage"} may be followed in order to continuously monitor a workflow instance. The algorithm applies the stages' scheduler functions as soon as its predicate is fulfilled and submit individual nodes to a packtivity backend.\
## Yadage
### Workflow Definition
As for packtivities, the `yadage-schemas` package includes JSON schemas to define workflow stages. From experience complex workflows may be defined using a small number of stage-types. Currently stages that schedule one or more nodes of a singled packtivity (each with different parameters) are defined. In the case of multi-node stages, a number of scattering patterns maybe used. An example stage definition is shown in listing [\[mnt:stage\]](#mnt:stage){reference-type="ref" reference="mnt:stage"}. The dependencies are listed by naming other stages. The current stage is then considered applicable if all nodes by the dependent stage are successfully processed. The scheduler function \(f\), is defined under the `scheduler` property and includes instructions on how to access the result data of dependent nodes added to the Graph by dependent stages in order to define the parameters of the packtivity to be scheduled. As seen in the listing, JSON References are used in order to reference packtivity definitions via URIs.
## Workflow composition
An important feature of workflows defined via the yadage schemas is composability that is not dependent on coordination between workflow authors. HEP workflows can involve many different stages in order to transform real or simulated events from detector or even particle-level data all the way to a final analysis result. Parts of these workflows may be primarily defined by different groups. For example, the workflow to describe the generation of Monte Carlo events based on a certain model may be defined primarily by physics working groups, while the reconstruction chain to transform generated events into fully reconstructed events ('AOD' data) usually is the responsibility of a central reconstruction group. Finally the downstream analysis of those reconstructed events is done on the analysis-team level. Each of these macro-parts of the workflow may be a multi-stage workflow themselves, such that the ability to compose them without modification into a larger workflow is desirable. In the case of the currently defined yadage stages, this is easily achieved by modifying the stage schedule 'workflows' instead of individual packtivities. In this case, the scheduling function does not add nodes or edges, but rather adds newly defined stages corresponding to the sub-workflows to the instances list of stages, that subsequently will be applied in a scoped fashion to exclude the possibility of e.g. naming collisions/ambiguities.
# Applications
## Run-I reinterpretation
Workflows defined via the schemas outlined above have been used in a number of different contexts. ATLAS has published multiple re-interpretations of analyses prepared in Run-1. In these campaigns, a number of analyses designed to investigate particular supersymmetric scenarios have been re-interpreted to derive a more comprehensive assessment of the ATLAS experiments' sensitivity to supersymmetry such as under the 19-dimensional 'phenomenological MSSM' (pMSSM) or a more restricted five-dimensional scan targeting electroweak sparticle production.
## CERN Analysis Preservation Portal
The CERN Analysis Preservation Portal (CAP) aims to preserve analysis information in the form of a digital library. Besides assembling metadata of analyses, such as the involved researchers and institutes, it also seeks to archive more technical information, such as code repositories and software environments. The workflow and activity schemas described here have been deeply integrated into the CAP system. Thanks to the choice of JSON schemas, the can be treated as native data in the context of the Invenio Digitial Library framework facilitating, for example, discoverability and composability of workflow pieces.
## RECAST
As noted, LHC experiments already engage in re-interpretation campaigns. However, the current approach requires a high level of coordination between analysis groups for each re-interpretation. RECAST is a framework in which the re-interpretation is streamlined by utilizing workflows that are archived in a re-usable manner. Originally proposed in 2010, a prototype backend implementation has been recently been developed and deployed at CERN. RECAST allows interested parties outside of the LHC collaboration to suggest for re-interpretation, by providing model information such as parameter cards in the SLHA format to the experiments using a web-based interface or, alternatively, REST and Python APIs. Upon review by the experiments, the experiment may decide to re-run an archived analysis based on these new model inputs and provide a response in the form of likelihood information (e.g. \(CL_s\) values) The prototype backend consists of a 'control-center' web-service that is accessible using VO-filtered CERN Single-Sign-On. This web-service displays incoming requests and allows operators to launch a re-execution of an analysis based on the RECAST request. The actual workflow execution is then handed off to a distributed system. Here, yadage and packtivity are heavily used to both define workflows and drive their execution. In the course of this development, a packtivity backend has been implemented that allows the scheduling of HEP container workloads on a Kubernetes Cluster deployed on the CERN OpenStack infrastructure using OpenStack Magnum. The integration with cloud-native tools allows for convenient scaling characteristics and a highly distributed workflow execution that may be monitored in real-time using the web-interface of the 'control-center'.
# Summary
We have presented a framework to define parametrized workflows in order to preserve high-energy physics analyses in a format that allows collaboration members to re-execute the original analysis in the context of new physics models. The framework defines a set of portable JSON schemas that describe both the individual processing steps and and workflow logic to orchestrate multiple steps. We also presented language-agnostic algorithms to re-execute analyses based on these descriptions. Furthermore, reference implementations of these algorithms distributed as python-based packages (`packtivity` and `yadage`) were presented. Workflows definitions and the reference implementation have been used in the past for re-interpretation campaigns within the ATLAS collaboration and are deeply integrated in the CERN Analysis Preservation Portal and RECAST projects. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-08T02:00:13', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01878', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01878'} |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
# Method
## Three-dimensional model of origami structures
A mathematical model of each experimentally generated origami structure is formulated for numerical simulation and 3D reconstruction. The model is composed of the vertex coordinates and the constraints imposed by the crease length between neighboring vertices. Given a 2D projection of all the vertex positions (\(x_i\), \(y_i\)), the \(z_i\) coordinates in the third dimension are obtained by minimizing a penalty function \(V(z)=\frac{k}{2} \sum_{i,j} ' \left[\sqrt{(x_i-x_j)^2+(y_i-y_j)^2+(z_i-z_j)^2}-l_{ij}\right] ^2\), where \(l_{ij}\) is the length of the crease between two connected vertices of indices \(i\) and \(j\) on the triangular crease lattice. The \(z\) coordinates can thus be obtained by solving the associated ordinary differential equation (ODE) array as \(\dot{z_i}=-k \sum_j ' \left[\sqrt{(x_i-x_j)^2+(y_i-y_j)^2+(z_i-z_j)^2}-l_{ij}\right] \hat{r}_{ij} \cdot \hat{z}\), where the unit vector \(\hat{r}_{ij}=((x_i-x_j)\hat{x}+(y_i-y_j)\hat{y}+(z_i-z_j)\hat{z})/\sqrt{(x_i-x_j)^2+(y_i-y_j)^2+(z_i-z_j)^2}\), and \(k\) is the virtual spring constant for perturbing the crease lengths. The ambiguity due to mountain-valley alignments is avoided by shifting the vertices up or down with a small amount in the \(z\) direction as the initial condition.
## Configuration space analysis
The configuration space of each vertex is described by the accessible folding angles of the connected creases. In the case of a degree-6 vertex, the configuration space is three dimensional (since DOF=3). Any potentially foldable structure is realized by rotating the creases through those 3 independent folding angles. The foldability is validated by the criterion that the distance between any pair of transformed vertices cannot be greater than that in the flat unfolded state for any inextensible sheet. Self-interceptions of the structures are also identified and excluded from the configuration space (see SI).
## Experiments
The origami structures were made from a flat paper sheet (Stardream Metallics 81lb) with measured thickness \(\tau=0.16\) mm and flexural rigidity \(D=4.0 \times 10^{-4}\) N\(\cdot\)m. The crease lines were perforated by a laser cutter and weakened manually by flat-folding along the perforation lines in both directions. Its folding kinematics were recorded by a top-view camera, which was calibrated for extracting the vertex locations. The \(x-y\) coordinates of the vertices were fed into the aforementioned mathematical model of the origami to extract the \(z\) depths of the vertices and the 3D configurations of the folded origami sheets were reconstructed using Matlab. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:05:06', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01687', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01687'} |
# Purpose {#sec:intro}
Volume calculation of lung lesions from Computed Tomography (CT) images plays a vital role in the evaluation of the level of lung disease. An efficient and accuracy method for volume measurement can provide reliable information for clinical diagnosis, which helps doctors to evaluate the state of patients and make appropriate therapies. Furthermore, doctors can estimate the timeliness and treatment effect of drugs with the help of the volume of lung lesions . However, many previous studies about the volume calculation for lesions tissue or organ from CT or MRI images are based on the diameters of lung lesions which roughly expresses the size, or based on 3D model reconstruction and surface triangulation which are not efficient and sometimes fail to build a perfect 3D model due to the high complexity of medical images . Monte Carlo method (MC) is very useful tool for physical and mathematical problems, especially in optimization, numerical integration . Quasi-Monte Carlo methods (qMC) (also called low-discrepancy sequences), which were proposed to generate random points with better uniformity and lower discrepancy, are often considered as a replacement of MC. Some qMC methods have already been used for computing the volume . In this paper, to accurately and directly calculate the volume of lung lesions, we introduce the low-discrepancy sequences to compute volume. In our study, the Halton low-discrepancy sequences are generated to calculate the area of each CT slice and the volume are obtained by accumulating these slices' area with a smooth formula. Experiments are conducted to evaluate our method compared with other methods.
# Method
MC method is a simple and efficient numerical method based on random sampling. However, in, Davies *et al.* pointed out that MC method is subject to errors and in particular all parts of space can not guarantee the equal sampling. Therefore, the sequence of Monte Carlo is not entirely uniform and it may lead to inaccuracy results. Fig [\[fig:compare\]](#fig:compare){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:compare"}(a) illustrates the distribution of pseudorandom number tends to be lumped. To generate more uniform sequences, low-discrepancy sequences are proposed. Compared with MC method, quasi-Monte Carlo method solves numerical problems using low-discrepancy sequences. The distribution of the Halton sequence is more uniformly as shown in Fig [\[fig:compare\]](#fig:compare){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:compare"}(b). Low-discrepancy sequences also have lower statistical errors. Low-discrepancy sequences have theoretical error bound O(\(N^{-1}\[(logN)^{D}\)) compared with pseudorandom sequences O(\(N^{-1/2}\)), where \(N\) is the number of samples and \(D\) denotes the dimensions. In this paper, we employ Halton sequences to generate quasi-random numbers. The Halton sequences are constructed according to a deterministic method that uses a prime number as its base. The sequence is implemented easily and has a very uniform distribution on low dimension. **Lesion Segmentation and Volume Calculation**. Our previous segmentation work is introduced to obtain the segmented results. The procedure of volume calculation has five steps: (1) building reference coordinate system in every slice of CT scanning image; (2) generating a certain number of random points in each slice using Halton low-discrepancy sequences; (3) finding out the number of random points who are inside the lung lesion region; (4) calculating the area (\(S_i\)) of the lung lesion region for each slice by the proportion of random points to all random points, the area can be calculated by \({S_i} \approx \frac{m}{N}{S_N}\) where \(m\) means the number of points inside the lung lesion, \(N\) represents the number of all points generated, and \(S_N\) is the area of each slice; and (5) calculating the volume of lung lesion using the formula of the frustum model as: \({\rm{V}} = \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{z-1} {\frac{{({S_i} + {S_{i + 1}} + \sqrt {{S_i}{S_{i + 1}}} ) \times h}}{3}}\), where \(S_i\) and \(S_{i+1}\) define the areas of lesions in the \(i\)th slice and the \((i+1)\)th slice, and \(h\) denotes the slice thickness. Fig [\[fig:volumepoints\]](#fig:volumepoints){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:volumepoints"} illustrates the random points generated by Halton sequence in 3D in the CT lung scans.
# Experimental Results {#sec:sections}
In this section, experiments are conducted on two kinds of CT data sets. The data was acquired at the 174 Hospital's CT room in Xiamen. The first data set is regular model, including cube, cuboid, and cylinder. See [\[fig:RegularModels\]](#fig:RegularModels){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:RegularModels"} for an illustration of the parameters of regular models, and we can calculate volumes of each model easily. Next, the CT scan data of each model was obtained using CT scanner in the CT room. And then the data can be used on our experiment. Table [\[fig:regular\]](#fig:regular){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:regular"} shows volumes of three regular models, which obviously demonstrates the result of three methods compared with ground truth volume. It has also shown that our method provides more accurate and precise results. The second data set is manual tumor delineation of different size of lung lesions. Therefore, the data sets are divided into three groups: small, medium and large lung lesions. Each group has three data sets. The ground truth of each data set is provided by the experienced doctors who manually tag the CT lesion in each slice. The binary image of each slice is got using two value (\(-4.0\) standing for background and \(4.0\) indicating the lung lesion). This can guarantee the accurate segmentation of the lung lesion at the most extent. In order to evaluate our method, our results are compared with the Monte Carlo method and the method named LSTK using a discretized version of the divergence theorem described by Alyassin et al.. Our experiments were run in Visual Studio 2010 using MicroSoft Windows 8.1 platform on a CPU of Intel 3.50GHz core i3-4150 with 4GB of RAM. In our proposed method, the dimension was set as \(5\) to generate \(5\) columns of low-discrepancy value and we chose the first and the fifth column (dimension) of the sequences. We define the relative error \(E\) as the evaluation criteria by the following formula: \]E = \frac{{\left| {ComputedVolume-TrueVolume} \right|}}{{TrueVolume}}\(\)
Table [\[fig:table\]](#fig:table){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:table"} shows the results of volume calculation and its corresponding relative errors for all methods. It is demonstrated that the results of LSTK have a lower accuracy and MC method's results is unstable. However, our method achieve more accurate results greatly closed to the true volume at most cases and more stable than MC method. We also analyze the accuracy of volume calculation when increase the random points for the MC method and our proposed method. Fig. [\[fig:RegularPoints\]](#fig:RegularPoints){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:RegularPoints"} illustrates the results of obtained of three regular models, the relative error versus the number of points used for volume measurement using the logs to base 10. For each graph, the theoretical error is plotted, which is compared to the actual relative error using our method. In the Fig. [\[fig:RE\]](#fig:RE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:RE"}, we compare the two methods among the three typical cases. As is shown in the Fig. [\[fig:RegularPoints\]](#fig:RegularPoints){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:RegularPoints"} and Fig. [\[fig:RE\]](#fig:RE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:RE"}. It is illustrated that our proposed method has lower relative errors in all cases compared with MC method. Because for our method, fewer number of points is supposed to achieve a given accuracy.
Comparing the MC method and ours, the graph above give a distinct analysis. Taking a different look, Table [\[fig:table\]](#fig:table){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:table"} shows the relative efficiency three regular models and nine cases for the two method. To achieve 1% accuracy, the number of points approximately needed is shown in the table, and the ratio of MC method and our method is computed.
# Discussion and Conclusion
In this study, the Halton low-discrepancy sequence is applied to calculate the volume for CT lung lesions. Compared with LSTK, the proposed method can calculate volume without reconstructing 3D model of lung lesions and surface triangulating. The proposed method can also generate more uniform random points compared with MC method. The experimental results are demonstrated that our proposed method can achieve more accurate results compared with LSTK and MC method and more stable than MC method. In our near future study, we will improve the random points selection strategy for volume calculation since the more number of points selected, the more time costs in calculation. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:04:16', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01644', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01644'} |
# Introduction
Earth's atmosphere poses a persistent challenge to astronomers making ground-based observations at near infrared (NIR) wavelengths, where telluric water vapor absorption lines are numerous. Furthermore, the strengths of these absorption lines are variable in time and depend on the amount of precipitable water vapor (PWV) present in the atmospheric column above the observatory. Mitigating the effects of water vapor absorption in astronomical data typically involves differential measurement techniques. While differential photometry removes first order effects of atmospheric variability, second order effects can be large depending on the spectral energy distributions of the target and reference stars. Because red stars incur more absorption than blue ones, a mismatch in the temperatures of the target star and the reference stars can still leave second-order photometric errors of over 1%. Ground-based follow-up studies of exoplanet detections around M-dwarf host stars and future surveys aiming for sub 1% photometric precision in the NIR are among those observations most affected. For example, the MEarth survey, which is performing a ground-based search for exoplanets around M-dwarfs, rarely have comparison stars in their field-of-view (FOV) as red as their targets. As a result, the common-mode of their light curves undergo fluctuations from anywhere between 1 and 10 mmag between nights that correlate with ground-level humidity measurements. Spectroscopic detection of exoplanets via the radial velocity (RV) method is also affected by telluric lines. While the large patches of telluric absorption features imprinted on the data can be masked out, found that micro-telluric lines can still limit RV measurements at the level of 1 m/s depending on the RV of the target star and the PWV during the observation. These microtelluric lines therefore cannot be ignored by future exoplanet RV surveys aiming to reach 10-20 cm/s precision with instruments such as ESPRESSO and NEID. Radiative transfer models of Earth's atmosphere scaled according to a single optical depth parameter do an excellent job of describing the wavelength-dependent transmission of the atmosphere (e.g. ). However, a real-time measurement of the optical depth, \(\tau\), is still needed to produce an appropriate atmospheric model corresponding to a specific time. While this optical depth parameter can be extracted from the high resolution science spectral data itself, telluric lines can be blended with stellar lines. Additionally, spectroscopic data solely for the purpose of atmospheric characterization is difficult to obtain, especially if it needs to be coincident with photometric observations. Monitoring the PWV in real-time using a dedicated instrument would enable the generation of accurate atmospheric transmission models and alleviate the need to sacrifice valuable observing time for calibration observations. While GPS monitoring systems are commonly used for measuring PWV, these instruments require maintenance and are less accurate in dry conditions, which are typical of observing sites. An alternative to the GPS monitoring system is a multiband photometer. Recently, a team of scientists from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) built a multiband photometer using narrowband filters called the aTmCam to monitor telluric absorption by constantly observing a bright star that serves to backlight the atmosphere. Here, we present results from a similar instrument, called the Camera for the Automatic Monitoring of Atmospheric Lines (CAMAL) that we built for use by the MINiature Exoplanet Radial Velocity Array (MINERVA), MINERVA-Red, and MEarth surveys located at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory (FLWO) on Mount Hopkins in Arizona. CAMAL focuses on measuring PWV, which is the most important variable atmospheric absorption component for the exoplanet surveys CAMAL is aiding. In §[2](#sec:require){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:require"} we discuss the system requirements for CAMAL. We present the design of CAMAL in §[3](#sec:Instrum){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Instrum"} then discuss the observations taken in §[4](#sec:data){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:data"}. The methods for extracting PWV from the data are described in §[5](#sec:extract){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:extract"} and in §[6](#sec:uncertainty){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:uncertainty"} we address the absolute and relative uncertainties affecting CAMAL PWV measurements. In §[7](#sec:results){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:results"} we present the results compared to nearby GPS monitors and PWVs extracted from the Tillinghast Reflector Echelle Spectrometer (TRES), which is also located on Mount Hopkins. In §[8](#sec:conc){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:conc"} we summarize the performance of CAMAL and discuss future improvements to the system.
# System Requirements {#sec:require}
To determine how accurate our PWV monitoring instrument must be in order to aid an exoplanet survey designed to detect transits of millimagnitude (hereafter mmag) depth, we must first determine the magnitude of the error induced by nightly PWV variations after differential photometry is performed. To model this, we assume stellar and planet parameters matching the TRAPPIST-1 system and assume a reference star of 4600 K, which is the average temperature of stars in the Tycho catalog. We use PHOENIX stellar models for each star's spectral energy distribution and calculate these stars' fluxes for a range of PWV conditions by multiplying each stellar spectrum by a TAPAS water vapor transmission spectrum appropriate for Mount Hopkins and integrating over the effective passband of the MEarth survey. In Figure [\[fig:TRAPPIST\]](#fig:TRAPPIST){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:TRAPPIST"}a we plot the magnitude difference between TRAPPIST-1a (2600K) and the 4600K reference star as a function of PWV. For relatively dry conditions (PWV \<5 mm), the photometric error induced by PWV absorption is 2 mmag/mm, as indicated by the black line in Figure [\[fig:TRAPPIST\]](#fig:TRAPPIST){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:TRAPPIST"}a, which is a linear fit for PWV \(<\) 5 mm. In situations where there only exists reference stars hotter than 4600 K, the second order atmospheric effects will be larger than 2 mmag per millimeter change in PWV. The TRAPPIST-1 planet transit depths range from 3 mmag to 8 mmag, meaning millimeter changes in PWV could produce spurious transit-like signals or potentially obscure a true transit signal. How PWV actually evolves over the transit duration will ultimately determine whether the transit event will be detectable or not. For an hour long transit, which is the typical transit duration for the TRAPPIST planets, 1-2 millimeter changes in PWV can occur even during drier nights (PWV \<5 mm). We show an example of this in Figure [\[fig:TRAPPIST\]](#fig:TRAPPIST){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:TRAPPIST"}b using Kitt Peak PWV values from the SuomiNet network. In this example the PWV above Kitt Peak dropped from 3 mm to 1 mm then increased back to 3.5 mm over the course of approximately four hours. An event like this could create a 4 mmag transit-like photometric dip for a star like TRAPPIST-1a, showing the importance of monitoring PWV to avoid confusing transit events for PWV variability. Though trends in PWV such as the one shown in Figure [\[fig:TRAPPIST\]](#fig:TRAPPIST){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:TRAPPIST"}b will not occur every night, transit events are intrinsically infrequent and thus monitoring PWV will help minimize the chance of either false or non-detections due to changes in PWV. Based on these simulations, we conclude that correcting for PWV variations is crucial for precise NIR differential photometry of cool stars. Specifically, contemporaneous PWV measurements with a relative precision of \(\pm 0.5\)mm should provide a means to directly correct photometric measurements for second order extinction effects and achieve mmag precision. Other methods for correcting PWV variations such as using the common-mode trend of a multitude of photometry may also reduce the impact of these second order extinction effects. While a discussion of the optimal method for making this correction is beyond the scope of this paper, we have designed CAMAL to achieve PWV measurement precision of \(\pm 0.5\)mm.
# CAMAL Instrument Design {#sec:Instrum}
CAMAL utilizes a Celestron six-inch aperture Schmidt-Cassegrain optical tube mounted on a robotic Software Bisque German Equatorial MyT mount. For imaging we use an SBIG STF-8300 monochrome CCD and a filter wheel that contains three narrowband filters, one of which overlaps a dense set of atmospheric water absorption lines. The other two filters are chosen to overlap regions of very low atmospheric absorption. We use the Software Bisque telescope driver along with Python scripts to automate the instrument's pointing and tracking through Software Bisque's TheSkyX control software. Figure [\[fig:camal\]](#fig:camal){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:camal"} shows an annotated picture of the instrument in its permanent home on Mount Hopkins in one of the MINERVA domes, in addition to an internal view of the filter wheel with the three CAMAL filters in place. We chose filters 25 mm in diameter with central wavelengths of 780 nm, 823 nm, and 860 nm. The 780 nm filter was an in-stock laser cleanup filter purchased from Semrock[^1], while the other two filters were production overrun filters from Omega Optical[^2]. We list the filter properties in Table [1](#tab:filters){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:filters"} and plot the filter profiles over a model atmospheric transmission spectrum in Figure [\[fig:filters\]](#fig:filters){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:filters"}. We selected these filters to have central wavelengths within 100 nm of each other with the central filter overlapping water vapor absorption lines while the other two filters avoid overlapping any significant atmospheric features. Given a stellar source that serves as a backlight to the atmosphere, changes in the central 823 nm filter flux will correspond to changes in PWV, while the other filters pick up any achromatic changes in flux due to cloud coverage, changes in airmass, or intrinsic stellar variation. The three filters also were chosen to have similar physical sizes and similar narrow bandwidths on the order of a few nanometers. These requirements ensure that the exposure times for imaging our target stars are similar in each of the three filters. The narrow FWHM of these filters also ensures that the 823 nm filter is localized to a strong set of water absorption features. The 860 nm filter does not overlap with the 866.2 nm ionized calcium triplet line, which is often found in the spectra of F, G, and K type stars and can vary in time. While CAMAL's targets will tend to be blue stars (T\(_{\rm{Eff}}>9000\)K) to avoid strong stellar features, in order to keep exposure times per filter below 10s, our limiting \(i\)-band magnitude is about \(i\) \<2.5, making it necessary to occasionally observe cooler stars to remain above an airmass limit or to avoid the Moon, for example. Currently, CAMAL is set up to continuously observe a bright star through one filter at a time while cycling through the filter wheel. Originally, the instrument was designed to have a simultaneous imaging setup, where the filters were located at the front aperture of the telescope with wedge prisms to deviate the locations of the stellar images in the different filters on the focal plane. This was similar to the design envisaged by and tested in. ultimately abandoned this design due to different optimal exposure times for each filter and filter irregularities. While our filters were chosen to ensure similar exposure times, we found that the two filters from Omega Optical were not optically flat, causing a very large change in the focus position between filters when the filters were placed at the telescope pupil. This focus difference and a lack of other filter options led us to modify our design to incorporate a filter wheel that would quickly cycle through each filter. While we may upgrade in the future to multiple telescopes and CCDs to enable truly simultaneous imaging in each filter, the filter wheel transitions are fast enough such that stars brighter than \(i\)-band magnitude of 2.5 can be observed with a complete filter cycle in less than 30s. analyzed the temporal variations of PWV over several nights and found that in three minutes, the PWV changes were mostly attributed to instrumental uncertainty. Although the results are from a different observing site, we feel it is safe to assume that the 30s time-scale for a filter cycle is short compared to the expected timescale of atmospheric PWV variations above Mt. Hopkins. Though PWV is not expected to change significantly during the timescale of one complete filter cycle, the filter wheel setup is susceptible to changes in atmospheric opacity due to nonuniform, patchy clouds moving and changing on minute timescales. In our test observations, only one night was considered to be photometric throughout, but overall we found non-photometric conditions (i.e. thin clouds) did not significantly impact our ability to extract PWV estimates from the CAMAL fluxes. The impact of clouds on CAMAL's PWV measurements is addressed in detail in §[6.3](#sec:clouds){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:clouds"}.
# Observations & Data Reduction {#sec:data}
## CAMAL
During a commissioning phase, we collected data with CAMAL over four nights in the summer of 2016 and seven nights in the late fall of 2016. In the summer the main target star was Polaris while in the fall the target list included Vega, Elnath, and Regulus. CAMAL continuously imaged each of its targets according to a preset schedule, cycling through the filters in the order of the 780 nm filter first, then the 823 nm filter, and ending with the 860 nm filter. Each night began by taking calibration images, including biases and twilight flats. Biases from each night are median combined to produce a nightly master bias frame. A stock set of three bias-subtracted, median combined, then normalized flat-fields for each filter are created. Flat-field corrections can become important because our small filters cause significant vignetting. In practice, the flat-field corrections typically have a negligible effect because the target star remains on the same few pixels in the center of the field of view (FOV) throughout the night. Science frames are bias-subtracted then flat-field corrected, then fluxes for the target star are extracted and the sky background subtracted using the `photutils` Python package. We refer to the flux values measured through each filter as \(f_{780}\), \(f_{823}\), and \(f_{860}\). We show example data from a CAMAL observing sequence in Figure [\[fig:fluxexample\]](#fig:fluxexample){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:fluxexample"}. On the left we show the relative fluxes for targets Elnath and Regulus observed on December 12th, 2016. The flux values have all been divided by a scaling factor that places \(f_{780}\) around unity. The corresponding colors \(c_1 = f_{823}/f_{780}\) and \(c_2 = f_{823}/f_{860}\) are shown on the right in Figure [\[fig:fluxexample\]](#fig:fluxexample){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:fluxexample"}. The change in targets (and visible shift in fluxes) occurs after 5.5 hours past the start time. The increasing trend in the colors for each target star is due to the fact that the targets on the night shown here were each tracked from higher airmass (above 2) to airmass 1. Though the fluxes change by 10-20\(\%\) because of clouds, this high level variability divides out when the flux ratios are taken to make the CAMAL colors. To assess the CAMAL photometry, we evaluate the expected photon error and compare this to the measured photometric error for the CAMAL color, \(c_1\). To do this we use five nights of observations of Elnath and compute the standard deviation of \(c_1\) over five minute intervals (10-11 filter cycles), which we plot as a function of airmass in Figure [\[fig:photunc\]](#fig:photunc){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:photunc"} in addition to the expected photometric uncertainty, which is shown as the red dashed line. The expected uncertainty is calculated by adding in quadrature the expected photon noise, scintillation noise, and read noise using the nominal \(f_{780}\) and \(f_{823}\) Elnath photon counts and then propagating this to the uncertainty in \(c_1\). The estimate for scintillation noise is based on Young's approximation. On average, the measured photometric error is twice the theoretical expectation based on scintillation, photon, and read noise. This underestimation may be due to an underestimation of the scintillation noise, which has been addressed by who found that Young's approximation underestimates the median scintillation noise by a factor of 1.5.
## TRES {#sec:tresdata}
Additional observations from the Tillinghast Reflector Echelle Spectrograph (TRES) on the 1.5-meter Tillinghast telescope at FLWO on Mount Hopkins are used to validate the CAMAL PWV measurements and calibrate the absolute CAMAL PWV scale. TRES is located approximately 100 meters from CAMAL and produces high-resolution (R \(\sim\) 30,000) stellar spectra over wavelength ranges covering the 823 nm water absorption features. The TRES spectra were reduced and blaze corrected according to the standard pipeline for TRES spectra. We use these spectra to extract PWV values directly from water line depths and compare to nearly contemporaneous CAMAL PWV measurements. The TRES instrument is on-sky in cycles of approximately two weeks as it alternates with another instrument installed on the Tillinghast telescope. Due to this, there is not always overlap between TRES and CAMAL observations. The TRES spectra that were selected were chosen to be the bluest, brightest star observed each night in order to reduce the influence of stellar lines on the fitting of the telluric water lines and additionally to ensure the spectra have high signal to noise ratios. Vega was a common target, but because Vega was typically observed during twilight several hours before CAMAL started observing, we also utilized TRES spectra of other targets that were observed closer in time to the CAMAL observations. In total, we utilize eight TRES spectra that overlap with seven CAMAL observing nights. Not all TRES observations are exactly contemporaneous with CAMAL observations because TRES begins observations of the brightest stars well before astronomical twilight. The airmasses of the TRES observations are also different than the CAMAL observations. We discuss this more when comparing CAMAL and TRES PWV measurements in §[7](#sec:results){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:results"}. To extract PWV from the TRES data, we fit a 15Å\(\:\)portion of the spectrum around 828 nm. We use a model atmospheric water vapor transmission spectrum appropriate for Mt. Hopkins from TAPAS to fit the data. We scale the water vapor transmission spectrum to a particular PWV value following Equation [\[eq:PWV\]](#eq:PWV){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PWV"}. We then convolve the model spectrum with a Gaussian of width \(\sigma\) to model the line spread function of the spectrograph, then multiply by a linear function to account for a slope in the continuum. Two parameters are used to describe the wavelength solution of the data, then the model spectrum and data are compared on the same wavelength grid. We use the `MC3` Python package to find the best fit parameters and parameter uncertainties. Since we do not account for airmass in the fit, we must divide the final best fit PWV value by the airmass of the observation to scale PWV to its value at an airmass of 1. This allows for a direct comparison to CAMAL PWVs, which also determines PWV scaled to an airmass of 1 (see Equation [\[eq:flux\]](#eq:flux){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:flux"}). An example fit of a TRES spectrum is shown in Figure [\[fig:tresfit\]](#fig:tresfit){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tresfit"}. For stars that contain more spectral absorption features, we fit multiple 15Å\(\:\) regions and average the results for PWV.
# Extracting PWV from the CAMAL Colors {#sec:extract}
To derive absolute PWV measurements from the CAMAL photometry, we construct a forward model that produces model CAMAL fluxes by integrating over a template stellar spectrum multiplied by the throughput of the entire optical system in each filter band. The forward model is pre-evaluated on a three dimensional grid of PWVs, airmasses, and stellar temperatures. Then, for a specific airmass and target-star temperature, the PWV can be quickly evaluated by matching the observed CAMAL fluxes to those generated by the forward model. This quick calculation is useful when real-time PWV measurements are required. Alternatively, the time sequence of PWV over the night can be represented as a smoothly varying function and the whole night's data can be fit using an MCMC approach. We use this as a second method to extract PWVs from the data that allows us to characterize the statistical uncertainty in our PWV measurements.
## Generating Model Color Grids {#sec:pwvquick}
We make use of the instrument response curves for the optical system, CCD, and filters provided by the vendors to predict the overall wavelength dependent efficiency for CAMAL. For the model spectrum of the atmospheric absorption, we use the TAPAS web form[^4] to download one model spectrum containing only water vapor absorption features and another spectrum that only includes the effect of Rayleigh scattering. We scale the TAPAS telluric absorption model using \(\textrm{v}\), the precipitable water in a column of unit area in the atmosphere, according to \[\label{eq:PWV} \textrm{W}(\textrm{v}^\prime) = \textrm{W}(\textrm{v})^{\textrm{v}^\prime/\textrm{v}},\] where \(\textrm{W}\) is a telluric water vapor absorption spectrum generated using a known value of \(\textrm{v}\). We define the parameter \(\tau\), which is related to the water optical depth, as \(\tau = \textrm{v}^\prime/\textrm{v}\). For each of the stars that are observed, we use PHOENIX synthetic spectra of the corresponding temperature, surface gravity, and metallicity to predict the flux per unit telescope area, \(f\), through each filter, \(i\), which is derived using the following equation: \[\label{eq:flux} f_i = \int d\lambda \: \textrm{W}^{\tau \mathit{X}}(\lambda) R^\mathit{X}(\lambda) B_i(\lambda) S(\lambda, T) E(\lambda).\] We use \(R\) as the Rayleigh scattering function slope at a given airmass, \(X\), \(B\) for the filter bandpass, \(S\) as the stellar spectrum, and \(E\) as the combined efficiency of the telescope and CCD. We always take PWV to be at an airmass of 1 and then scale by the airmass of an observation. In this equation, the only time-dependent variables are airmass and stellar temperature, which are both known, and \(\tau\), which we wish to measure. We pre-evaluate Equation [\[eq:flux\]](#eq:flux){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:flux"} for all possible observations by integrating over wavelength assuming a grid of airmass values from 1.0 to 3.5 in steps of 0.01, stellar temperatures and properties matching those of our targets, and PWV values from 0 mm to 25 mm in steps of 0.1 mm. We use these model flux grids to generate the model colors \(m_1 = \frac{f_{823}}{f_{780}}\) and \(m_2 = \frac{f_{823}}{f_{860}}\) to compare to the observed CAMAL colors, \(c_1\) and \(c_2\). For each observation of the CAMAL color of a target star, the PWV during that measurement can be determined by where the observed color is located on this grid of model colors. In Figure [\[fig:fluxairmass\]](#fig:fluxairmass){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:fluxairmass"} we show example model colors, \(m_1\) and \(m_2\), both plotted versus airmass for a 10,000 K star and various values of PWV. We find that both colors are very sensitive to PWV. At an airmass of 1.3 and PWV value of 7 mm, there is a 1% change in \(m_1\) per millimeter change in PWV.
## Modeling PWV as a Smooth Function {#sec:fitting}
In the grid-based approach to extracting PWV, each CAMAL color must be matched to its respective color grid, which produces two different mappings to PWV. Although these two PWV mappings agree with each other under normal conditions (i.e. no external chromatic effects) and are just limited by photon noise to within our PWV grid spacing of 0.1 mm, we would prefer a method that fits both colors at the same time to find the best fit given all of the photometry and derives a single PWV time series for the night that is smoothly varying. To do this, we model the PWV as a smoothly varying function in time under the assumption that the typical timescale for PWV variability is 30 min. Modeling PWV in this way allows us to fit the entire night of data at once using an MCMC sampler that allows us to characterize our uncertainties. The fit is performed by using a spline function to define PWV as a function of time. We map this PWV time sequence to the time variation of CAMAL colors using the model color grids described in §[5.1](#sec:pwvquick){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:pwvquick"}. The optimal PWV function parameters are determined by minimizing the difference between the model and observed colors following value: \[\label{eq:min} \sum_i \Big[ \big(c_1(t_i)-m_1(\textrm{PWV}(t_i))\big)^2 + \big(c_2(t_i)-m_2(\textrm{PWV}(t_i))\big)^2\Big] \:.\] Here, \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) represent the CAMAL observed colors, and \(t_i\) is the time of exposure sequence \(i\). To define PWV(\(t_i\)) we use a 3rd order B-spline, which we define using the Python function `splev` from the `scipy.interpolate` package. More information regarding the definition of the spline can be found in the references for `splev`. We force the spline knot points to be stationary and equally spaced such that there is at least one knot point in each hour interval, including the end points. The hourly spaced knot points allow for variations on 30-minute time scales without overfitting the data. If \(N_{in}\) is the number of internal knots, then there are \(N_{in} + 4\) coefficients whose initial values are set to a starting value between 1 and 20 mm based on the model grid estimates. We use the `MC3` Python package to find best fit coefficients that describe \(\textrm{PWV}(t)\). The various realizations of \(\textrm{PWV}(t)\) using the parameters in the converged MCMC chains are used to determine the uncertainty in the PWV measurements while the median of them is taken to be the best fit.
# Assessing PWV Uncertainty {#sec:uncertainty}
Depending on the application, either relative or absolute PWV estimates may be necessary for correcting NIR spectroscopic or photometric measurements. We assess CAMAL's PWV accuracy in terms of how well CAMAL can measure absolute PWV values and we discuss precision in the context of CAMAL's ability to measure relative PWV values over time. In addition to this we discuss and characterize how clouds can contribute to both types of these uncertainties.
## Accuracy of Absolute PWV Measurement {#sec:accuracy}
The absolute calibration of CAMAL PWV estimates based on our forward modeling of the measured stellar flux depends on the total system throughput as a function of wavelength and the accuracy of our stellar models. However, the instrument efficiency profiles provided by the manufacturers are not direct measurements of our instrument. Additionally, while the 780 nm and 823 nm bands do not fall on any broad stellar spectral features in our hot target stars, the 860 nm band does overlap a Paschen series line that can be mismatched to our model spectrum depending on the true broadening of that line. While this could be alleviated by obtaining high-resolution spectra for each of our target stars over CAMAL's wavelength region, we can instead rely on the fact that the CAMAL flux through the 780 nm and 860 nm bands should match our model since flux through these two bands is independent of PWV. To calibrate the 823 nm model throughput, which is degenerate with PWV, we use independent PWV values extracted from TRES spectra. Because the 860 nm band overlaps a broad stellar spectral feature, we find that each star requires its own adjustment to its efficiency at 860 nm. The CAMAL filters are very narrow and so we can take the correction to both the instrument efficiency and stellar spectrum to be a scalar, \(A_{1}\), that is specific for each star. We indicate this by making it a function of temperature. \(A_1(T)\) is just the ratio of the true stellar flux and telescope efficiency (i.e. mirror reflectivity, CCD QE) at 860 nm divided by what was originally assumed: \[A_1(T) = \frac{S_{\mathrm{true}}(\lambda, T) E_{\mathrm{true}}(\lambda)}{S(\lambda, T) E(\lambda) } \biggr|_{\lambda=860\rm{nm}}\] This factor \(A_1(T)\) is determined such that \(f_{780}/f_{860}\) from our model agrees with our average flux measurement at airmass 1.0 for each star. We find that \(A_1(T)\) ranges between 0.88 and 0.94 for the range of targets used in this work. To assess how reasonable these offsets are, we use a true spectrum of Vega from the CALSPEC Calibration Database[^5] to calculate \(f_{780}/f_{860}\) and compare this to what we estimated using a PHOENIX synthetic spectrum. We find that \(f_{860}/f_{780}\) increases by 4% when we use the real spectrum of Vega compared to the PHOENIX model. Given the uncertainties in the reported efficiencies of the system components, such as the CCD, this is consistent with \(A_1\) = 93.4%, which is what was found for Vega. For calibrating \(f_{823}\), we find no significant difference in \(f_{823}/f_{780}\) when calculated with a real and synthetic spectrum for Vega. We therefore only determine one unique factor to account for uncertainty in CAMAL's assumed instrument efficiency at 823 nm: \[A_2 = \frac{E_{\mathrm{true}}(\lambda) }{ E(\lambda) } \biggr|_{\lambda = 823 \rm{nm}}\] To determine \(A_2\), we compare CAMAL PWV estimates to the TRES measurements of PWV. Because TRES PWVs are extracted from high resolution spectra using an atmospheric model, these PWVs are unbiased, independent measurements of PWV. We compute \(A_2\) by minimizing the root mean square difference between the TRES direct measurements of PWV and the corresponding PWV estimates from the CAMAL colors. We find that \(A_2\) is 97.9%, which implies that we were overestimating CAMAL's throughput by 2.1%, which is reasonable due to the uncertainties in the telescope reflectivity and CCD QE. Using the two scalars \(A_1(T)\) and \(A_2\) to recalculate Equation [\[eq:flux\]](#eq:flux){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:flux"} and remake our model grids. We use these calibrated grids to recompute PWV for each night. A plot of the CAMAL-TRES comparison before \(A_2\) is applied and after each of these two calibrations are performed is presented in Figure [\[fig:trescamal\]](#fig:trescamal){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:trescamal"}.
## PWV Measurement Precision {#sec:precision}
Assuming there are no other time varying chromatic effects in the CAMAL system other than PWV changing, the precision of CAMAL's measurements relies only on its ability to measure precise colors of its target star. We can therefore estimate its measurement precision by calculating the variation in our color measurements and then relating this to PWV measurement precision by propagating these color uncertainties through our PWV extraction method. In reality, clouds can potentially act as a time varying absorption that affects each filter slightly differently because the observations are not exactly contemporaneous. We address this in §[6.3](#sec:clouds){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:clouds"}. Using five nights of CAMAL photometry on the target star Elnath, we estimate the photometric precision of our observations by taking the standard deviation over ten minute intervals of binned CAMAL colors \(c_1\) and \(c_2\). We plot the standard deviation of each of these ten minute intervals for \(c_1\) as a function of airmass in Figure [\[fig:photerr\]](#fig:photerr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:photerr"}. This differs from Figure [\[fig:photunc\]](#fig:photunc){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:photunc"} because here we have binned \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) on 2 minute timescales (4-5 filter cycles) to average down the photometric noise in order to see how precise we measure \(c_1\) on longer timescales. For future CAMAL operations, we will limit observations to airmass less than 1.5 to reduce the effects of scintillation noise on CAMAL photometry. Using the empirical range in photometric precision (0.002 \<\(\sigma_{c_1}\) \<0.01) we found for \(c_1\), we propagate this photometric uncertainty into PWV uncertainty by using our model color grids to map color to PWV. We determine \(\Delta\)PWV, the difference in true PWV and PWV determined after adding \(\sigma_{c_1}\) to \(c_1\). We plot \(\Delta\)PWV versus \(\sigma_{c_1}\) for various PWV conditions in Figure [\[fig:pwverr\]](#fig:pwverr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:pwverr"}. For this calculation we assume an airmass of 1.3 and target star temperature of 10,000K. At an airmass of 1.3, \(\sigma_{c_1}\) clusters around 0.006 in Figure [\[fig:photerr\]](#fig:photerr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:photerr"}. This propagates to a precision of better than 0.5 mm in drier conditions, when PWV \<4 mm. These estimates of CAMAL's PWV precision agree with the statistical uncertainties in PWV determined from the fit to the photometry using a spline functional form for PWV as described in Section 5.2.
## The Impact of Clouds {#sec:clouds}
Due to the filter wheel design of CAMAL, the instrument does not make perfectly simultaneous measurements in all three bands. Though filter cycles are short compared to the expected timescale of variations in the atmosphere, clouds move very quickly across the field of view and therefore can effectively introduce a chromatic effect as the cloud extinction varies over a complete CAMAL filter cycle. If the magnitude of the cloud extinction changes randomly, clouds will increase the scatter in the photometry, worsening the photometric precision. If the cloud extinction is inherently chromatic, this could also systematically bias our measurements of PWV. To understand the magnitude of this effect, we use a night of data (Dec. 6th, 2016) that was clear at the beginning of the night, was affected by thin clouds for for a period of approximately an hour, then finished with a very sharp drop in flux due to thickening clouds. To understand if clouds cause a systematic bias in the estimated PWVs, we look for systematics in the extracted best fit PWV that correlate with cloud absorption. If clouds are not acting as gray absorbers, we would expect a systematic trend in PWV correlating with changes in the overall flux attenuation due to clouds. In the top panel of Figure [\[fig:clouderr\]](#fig:clouderr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:clouderr"}, we plot \(f_{780}\) for Elnath along with CAMAL PWVs in gray and PWVs from the nearby site at Kitt Peak National Observatory plotted in red. Where flux is decreasing due to clouds (time \>2.8 hours) we see no systematic trend in the CAMAL PWVs. While the PWV between Mt. Hopkins and Kitt Peak are not perfectly correlated (see in §[7.2](#sec:GPS){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:GPS"}) the Kitt Peak PWVs are consistent with constant for this night, implying that the overall PWV level at Mt. Hopkins was likely stable over this night as well, consistent with the CAMAL measurements shown in Figure 10. Based on this, we conclude from this that chromatic effects in clouds do not significantly bias the CAMAL photometric PWV estimates. To estimate how clouds affect PWV precision, we take the 'real time' PWVs extracted from the model grids. We would expect increased photometric scatter due to clouds to be evident in the scatter of the grid-based PWV estimates. We show the standard deviation of ten minute intervals of the grid-based PWVs binned by 5 filter cycles (2 minutes) in Figure [\[fig:clouderr\]](#fig:clouderr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:clouderr"}. The scatter in PWV decreases with time because of decreasing airmass, but increases again at times coincident with cloud absorption. While the effects of clouds are not debilitating, in future runs we will choose to move targets if cloud absorption reduces the nominal target flux by over 20%, which will aid CAMAL in maintaining its goal of 0.5 mm precision in PWV.
# Results & Discussion {#sec:results}
Here we present results using data from the commissioning of CAMAL over four nights in the summer of 2016 and seven full nights in the late fall of 2016. We show in Figure [\[fig:camaldata\]](#fig:camaldata){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:camaldata"} the PWVs extracted following both methods described in §[5](#sec:extract){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:extract"} for the six nights of data taken in December 2016. In each panel, the gray data points are 'real time' PWV measurements from CAMAL colors \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) using the model grids described in §[5.1](#sec:pwvquick){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:pwvquick"}. The gray shaded region is the 3\(\sigma\) region from the fit to all the data using a smooth function to describe the time evolution of PWV over the night, as described in §[5.2](#sec:fitting){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:fitting"}. PWV data from two nearby GPS PWV monitoring systems on the SuomiNet system are also plotted. In red are PWV data from Kitt Peak Observatory and in blue are PWVs from the Amado site. For the nights shown in Figure [\[fig:camaldata\]](#fig:camaldata){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:camaldata"}, the PWVs found by CAMAL do not vary more than 4 mm in one night. Each night's temporal variation is unique, with some nights showing an increasing trend in PWV, while others show a decrease in PWV over the course of the night. The two different methods for extracting PWV agree well, with no systematic offsets. Times in the night where target stars were changed are noticeable in some nights of data because we typically slewed to a target at high airmass and tracked it upwards towards zenith. The scatter in the photometric data increases after this transition due to the increase in scintillation noise at higher airmass.
## TRES Comparison {#sec:trescompare}
Seven nights of TRES PWV values are compared in Figure [\[fig:trescamal\]](#fig:trescamal){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:trescamal"} to CAMAL values. The gray points are the CAMAL values that were used to determine \(A_2\) and the blue points are after \(A_2\) was used to calibrate the CAMAL instrument throughput. Because all but two of the TRES and CAMAL measurements are not perfectly contemporaneous (some TRES spectra were taken outside of CAMAL's observing window by as much as a few hours), we plot the CAMAL PWV value nearest in time to the corresponding TRES spectrum taken on the same night. For one night we plot two points because two TRES spectra were taken that night at times separated by a few hours. The values and uncertainties of the CAMAL PWV values are taken from the results of the fit of PWV defined as a spline function, as described in §[5.2](#sec:fitting){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:fitting"}. These data were used to calibrate the CAMAL instrument throughput at 823 nm. The calibrated model of the instrument throughput results in the excellent correspondence shown here between TRES PWVs and CAMAL PWVs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.98. The residuals between CAMAL (post \(A_2\) calibration) and TRES values have a root mean square scatter of 0.7 mm. This remaining scatter in the relationship between the CAMAL and TRES data may be due to a combination of spatial and/or temporal variations in PWV between the observations since the corresponding measurements are not all perfectly contemporaneous, and the target stars had a range in angular separation on the sky. The residuals of the CAMAL data relative to the TRES PWV measurements data do not correlate with the temporal or spatial offsets between the two measurements. Our understanding of these residuals will continue to improve with more nights of contemporaneous observations between TRES and CAMAL. Since the TAPAS atmospheric models are directly tied to a physical model of the atmosphere and PWV in an absolute sense, from these comparisons between TRES and CAMAL we conclude that CAMAL produces PWVs with an absolute accuracy of approximately 0.7 mm.
## Comparison to Nearby GPS Monitors {#sec:GPS}
We investigate how correlated CAMAL PWVs are with the Kitt Peak and Amado PWV monitors by comparing the various sites' PWVs over the nights CAMAL observed. The GPS station at Kitt Peak Observatory is at an altitude of 6900 ft and is approximately 90 km away while the GPS PWV monitoring system in the nearby town of Amado is approximately 30 km away from Mount Hopkins at an altitude of 3000 ft. In Figures [\[fig:azamcamal\]](#fig:azamcamal){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:azamcamal"} and [\[fig:kittcamal\]](#fig:kittcamal){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:kittcamal"} we compare CAMAL PWVs to Amado and Kitt Peak PWVs, respectively. Error bars are omitted from these plots for clarity, however the GPS water vapor monitors have a reported measurement uncertainty of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1 mm. In total there were ten nights that had both Kitt Peak and Amado PWV measurements. Since the GPS monitor takes measurements every half hour, we plot all the GPS measurements in a night versus the coincident CAMAL measurements taken as a median over a ten-minute bin of CAMAL PWVs derived from the model grids and centered at the time of the GPS measurement. However, data from two nights in June were excluded in Figure [\[fig:kittcamal\]](#fig:kittcamal){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:kittcamal"} when the Kitt Peak PWV monitor was reporting extremely high values (\>25 mm), which are likely due to active precipitation. The PWV comparisons between sites show highly correlated conditions between Kitt Peak and Mt. Hopkins with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96 and an RMS difference of 0.8 mm from a linear fit. Amado and CAMAL are slightly less correlated, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.92 and an RMS difference of 1.6 mm from a linear fit. Both Kitt Peak and Amado have wetter conditions when compared to CAMAL values. Due to the elevation differences between the CAMAL site on Mount Hopkins and the GPS sites of Kitt Peak (900 ft lower) and Amado (4800 ft lower), the drier conditions at Mt. Hopkins as shown by CAMAL are expected. The expected average relationship between Kitt Peak and Mt. Hopkins PWVs based on TAPAS atmospheric models, which only differ by site altitude, is that Kitt Peak PWVs are 1.12 times higher than PWVs at Mount Hopkins. This is similar to slope of 1.16 found in the linear fit between CAMAL and Kitt Peak PWVs. Correlating PWV between two different sites has been done in previous studies. For example, in the authors were able to correlate two GPS monitors that were 50 km away from each other with a 4000 ft elevation difference. found that the two were highly correlated with deviations from linear at PWV \<1 mm. The comparison presented here between Amado and CAMAL also shows deviations from linearity at low PWV values, but this is not the case when comparing Kitt Peak to Mt. Hopkins. The PWV comparisons presented in and this work shows the utility of using one site's PWV measurements to estimate conditions at a nearby site. Selecting PWV data from another site at a similar altitude may be preferable to simply using PWV data from the nearest location.
# Conclusions {#sec:conc}
We have successfully developed and installed an automatic PWV monitoring system, CAMAL, at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory on Mount Hopkins that will aid the MINERVA, MINERVA-Red, and MEarth exoplanet surveys. CAMAL uses three narrowband filters, one of which is centered on water vapor telluric lines at 823 nm. By observing bright stars throughout a night, changes in flux through the 823 nm on-band filter correspond to changes in telluric water vapor content, or PWV, above Mount Hopkins, while the other two off-band filters serve as a reference to track any achromatic changes in flux not due to water vapor. By constructing a forward model and using independent measurements of PWV derived from high-resolution optical spectra to calibrate CAMAL's throughput, we are able to map the observed CAMAL flux ratios to absolute PWV measurements. The commissioning data presented in this work spread over 11 nights in the summer and late fall of 2016. With these measurements we show that our photometric precision allows CAMAL to achieve better than 0.5 mm PWV precision for PWV conditions of \<4 mm. This level of precision will allow for mmag photometry for transiting exoplanet surveys targeting cool stars in the NIR. Additionally, comparisons between CAMAL PWVs and those from a GPS water vapor monitor at Kitt Peak National Observatory show that the PWVs at these sites are highly correlated with a 0.8 mm RMS difference from a linear fit. This demonstrates the utility of using the PWV conditions from a nearby site at a similar altitude as a first estimate of local PWV. In future work we plan to upgrade CAMAL to a new design that allows for truly simultaneous measurements of a star through each of CAMAL's three filters. This will involve a total of three optical tubes and CCDs each equipped with one of the three filters that together will simultaneously image the same star. Although the current filter wheel design has allowed CAMAL to achieve its goal of measuring PWVs with \(\pm\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.5 mm precision, a simultaneous setup would eliminate CAMAL's current vulnerability to highly variable clouds effectively reducing photometric precision. Additionally, we must currently limit CAMAL to stars brighter than \(i=2.5\) mag in order to keep filter cycles periods under 30s to minimize the impact of atmospheric variability due to clouds. With a simultaneous setup, we would not have to limit exposure times and thus could observe fainter stars and increase the number of CAMAL targets. Having more target options could become useful if it is necessary for CAMAL targets to be nearby on the sky with respect to the science targets that will be aided by CAMAL's PWV measurements. Though did not find measurable variation on the sky in an 8 day campaign at CTIO, we will perform a similar study to assess the spatial variation of PWV on the sky at Mount Hopkins using CAMAL. We would like to thank the anonymous referee for his or her helpful comments that improved this manuscript. We also thank the Fred Whipple Observatory support staff for their help machining the base attachment for CAMAL and for their quick on-site support when it was needed. We thank the MINERVA Collaboration for letting us install CAMAL in one of their domes and Jason Eastman for his coding help. We thank David Latham and Allyson Bieryla for picking out and sending us the TRES spectra used in this work. We acknowledge the use of `astropy` in this work and thank the Astropy Collaboration for their hours spent working on this open source code. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1321851 to A.D.B.
[^1]: https://www.semrock.com
[^2]: http://www.omegafilters.com
[^3]: Due to a blue leak in the 780 nm filter, it was combined with a high-pass filter from Omega Optical. The peak transmission for the 780 nm filter therefore includes the 96.5% decrease in maximum throughput due to the addition of the high-pass filter.
[^4]: http://www.pole-ether.fr/tapas/
[^5]: http://www.stsci.edu/hst/observatory/crds/calspec.html | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:07:21', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01798', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01798'} |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
# Introduction
The gaseous circumgalactic medium (CGM) around galaxies serves as a massive reservoir of baryons and metals [@peeples2014; @werk2014; @keeney2017] and an import driver of galactic evolution. For example, gas and metals accreted from the CGM may provide the fuel for as much as half of a massive galaxy's stellar mass by \(z\sim0\). The CGM includes contributions from a broad range of sources. It includes material ejected from the central galaxy in the form of winds [e.g., @weiner2009; @tripp2011; @shen2013; @rubin2014; @cafg2015; @muratov2017], which may ultimately return to the galaxy. The CGM includes matter removed from satellites as gas stripped via tidal forces or ram pressure or gas ejected via the winds of those same satellites.[^1] It likely also includes matter that has accreted from the IGM, either as cold gas or gas that is heated via its interaction with the existing CGM. Most of these processes produce (at least initially) relatively dense, cool concentrations of gas. This is the case even for galactic winds, for which a significant fraction of the mass ejected may come from cool, entrained or condensed material [e.g., @heckman1990; @schwartz2004; @rupke2005; @rubin2014; @kacprzak2014]. These cool streams of matter may ultimately fall onto the central galaxy itself, perhaps fueling future star formation [@keres2005; @oppenheimer2010; @ford2014] or dissipate within the hotter, more diffuse coronal matter in the halo [e.g., @joung2012; @voit2015]. Thus, the observable CGM about galaxies is expected to be multiphase, with the very diffuse warm and hot gas [\(10^5 \la T \la 10^7\) K; @tumlinson2011; @prochaska2011; @wakker2009; @anderson2013] threaded with denser cool gas [\(10^4 \la T \la 10^5\) K; @nielsen2013; @kacprzak2013; @werk2014; @keeney2017], including the dense structures that could represent new matter flowing into the CGM for the first time. In the context of the CGM, such dense (\(n_{\rm H} \ga 10^{-3}\) cm\(^{-3}\)) and cool (\(T < 10^5\) K) structures are ionized entities. They have characteristic densities and size scales that produce optical depths at the Lyman limit of order unity and above [@schaye2001; @fumagalli2011a; @cafg2011; @van-de-voort2012]. In QSO absorption line studies of the CGM, these streams would thus be categorized as Lyman limit systems, with \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities \(N(\mbox{\ensuremath{\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}}}) \ge 1.6\times10^{17}\) cm\(^{-2}\) (\(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.2\)), which corresponds to an optical depth at the H ionization edge of \(\tau_{\rm 1 Ryd} \ge 1\). Studies of low-redshift Lyman limit systems have shown they exhibit a broad range of metallicities, from \(<1\%\) solar to super-solar metallicities, as expected if they are tracing a range of origins, including accreting, stripped, or expelled matter. Simulations of galaxies at \(z\approx2\) show that optically-thick \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) material may cover \(\sim2\%-10\%\) of the area within the virial radius of typical galaxies, with a signicantly higher covering fraction at the smallest impact parameters. Only recently have simulations been able to regularly study the high-density structures in the CGM to \(z=0\) with full feedback prescriptions. The covering factors of optically thick gas in simulated galaxies at low redshift tend to be lower on average than their higher-redshift counterparts, partly due to the general dimunition expected in cold accretion as well as generally diminished feedback. For example, @hafen2017 (hereafter ) find a median \(f_c \sim 1\%\) for \(\log M_{\rm halo}/\ensuremath{M_\odot}\relax \approx 12\) galaxies at \(z=0\). Still, the covering factors for individual galaxies can be as high as \(f_c \sim 10\%-15\%\), depending on the feedback recipes and the histories of recent star formation, mergers, and accretion. Measurements of optically-thick \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) thus constrain the total mass in the densest material associated flows of matter through the CGM while also constraining prescriptions for feedback and other processes in galaxy simulations. The study of galactic halos at \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \sim 17-18\) has largely been limited to absorption line measurements. However, the the best radio observatories now reach sensitivities to \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) 21-cm emission that get nearly to \(\tau_{\rm 1 \, Ryd} \approx 1\) gas around low-redshift galaxies [e.g., @braun2004; @lockman2012; @wolfe2013; @wolfe2016], bridging the gap between emission and absorption experiments. Radio searches for faint emission have the distinct advantage of (potentially at least) providing more spatial information than can be gleaned from the small numbers of skewers that are available for absorption line spectroscopy, with its need for bright background sources (especially in the ultraviolet). Here we use the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope (GBT), part of the Green Bank Observatory,[^2] to search for 21-cm emission from the halo of the nearby Andromeda galaxy. This 21-cm search is in support of our Project AMIGA (Absorption Maps In the Gas of Andromeda)[^3], a large *Hubble Space Telescope* (*HST*) program to study the absorption from the extended CGM about the Andromeda galaxy (M31) using the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS). Project AMIGA will measure UV absorption lines along \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}25 AGN sight lines passing within \(\rho \approx \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax \approx 300\) kpc of the center of M31. This builds on our recent study demonstrating that M31 has a massive, diffuse CGM stretching to approximately \(R_{\rm vir}\) [@lehner2015 hereafter ]. Project AMIGA will characterize the radial and azimuthal dependences of metal ion surface densities (for , , , , and others) in M31's CGM. However, our *HST* observations will provide little information on the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) distribution at the velocities where find metal absorption from M31's CGM (\(\ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \ga-500\) km s\(^{-1}\)), as the strongly-saturated Ly\(\alpha\) absorption from the Milky Way completely blocks the light from the background AGNs over these wavelengths. This is not a problem with \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) emission, where the Milky Way emission is largely constrained to higher velocities than M31's CGM. In the present work we target 48 directions through the Andromeda galaxy's halo in order to measure the covering factor of highly optically-thick gas (\(\tau_{\rm 1\, Ryd} \approx 2.5\)). Our observations achieve sensitivities to \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities that overlap with absorption line measurements of CGM \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) about more distant galaxies [e.g., @tumlinson2013; @lehner2013; @prochaska2017] and UV absorption line studies of high-velocity clouds in the CGM of our own Milky Way. As the 21-cm line is so easy to excite (the critical density for excitation is \(n_{\rm crit} \approx 3\times10^{-5}\) cm\(^{-3}\), well below the density of gas we are considering, and Ly\(\alpha\) pumping is also an effective excitation mechanism), these GBT observations allow us to trace gas even in conditions expected of the CGM. There is good reason to suspect that M31 may have a significant CGM, even one detectable in 21-cm emission. The relative dearth of neutral gas associated with dwarf satellite galaxies has led several groups to to argue for the existence of a low-density diffuse CGM about M31 to impact parameters \(\rho \la 270\) kpc [@blitz2000; @grcevich2009 see also @spekkens2014 for similar work specific to the Milky Way]. Similarly, although the giant southern stream has a dynamical age of \(<1\) Gyr, its star formation was shut off well before it was tidally disrupted, suggesting its gas was stripped by M31's CGM long ago. used ram pressure stripping arguments to imply a density of a few \(\times10^{-4}\) cm\(^{-3}\) for a diffuse (potentially hot) corona about M31. searched for metal line absorption from the halo of M31, but their sensitivity was limited by the low spectral resolution of their data. found significant metal ion surface densities for sight lines projected within \(\rho \approx \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax \approx 300\) kpc of M31, suggesting an extended distribution of low-density gas. The total CGM gas mass implied by the observations is significant at \(M_{\rm total} \ga 2\times10^8\, (Z/Z_\odot)^{-1}\) \(M_\odot\) within \(0.2\ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\), although the total mass could be a factor of 10 larger if the covering factor is near unity to the virial radius.[^4] The \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) emission from the diffuse CGM implied by these studies may be minimal, depending on the metallicity and ionization state of the gas. In the Andromeda system, reported the detection of a diffuse "bridge" of low column density material stretching between M31 and its companion M33 (projected \(\sim200\) kpc from M31), with an extension several degrees beyond M31 in the north (\(1^\circ \approx 13\) kpc at M31). In total found the filament stretched nearly 260 kpc. This work was done with a coarse angular resolution of \(49\arcmin\) and velocity resolution of 18 km s\(^{-1}\) to achieve a sensitivity of \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \approx 17\) for emission filling the beam, and much of the bridge emission appeared to have beam-averaged column densities well below \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \sim 18\). Subsequent high-resolution maps of the vicinity of M33 have called into questioned the presence of this bridge, given the lack of a bridge component in the maps of M33. confirmed the existence of faint 21-cm emission in this region between the two galaxies, but they noted the gas must be very patchy, as they did not find it consistently over several GBT pointings. and showed that most of the emission identified by was associated with higher column density, small-scale clumps of gas. The "bridge" appears to be constituted of small clouds (each with masses \(\sim10^5\) \(M_\odot\)) that appeared as more continuous, diffuse structure when diluted within the Westerbork beam employed by the study. And while did detect some emission in the extended structure found by to the northwest of M31, the spatial distribution of this gas appears to be much different than that implied by the initial maps. Thus, M31's CGM appears to harbor at least some small-scale concentrations of \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) detectable through their 21-cm emission. In the inner regions of M31's halo, identified a population of high-velocity clouds (HVCs) projected within \(\rho \sim 50\) kpc of the center of M31, which were subsequently mapped at higher resolution by. These clouds individually have \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) masses \(M_{\rm HI} \approx 10^5-10^6\) \(M_\odot\) with size scales of \(\sim1\) kpc and central column densities \(\ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \sim10^{19}\) cm\(^{-2}\)Ṫhey are discrete structures, dense clouds (\(n_{\rm HI} \approx 10^{-2}\) cm\(^{-3}\)) in the CGM that may be similar to the clouds identified at larger distances by, though with higher masses. In the present experiment (Project AMIGA GBT), we survey sight lines toward UV-bright AGNs with impact parameters \(\rho \la \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\) from M31 in order to characterize the distribution of dense, cool gas in the CGM. In no cases have the observed directions been chosen with prior knowledge of the local \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) content. Thus, we can use our observations to directly determine the covering factor of optically-thick gas in the CGM of M31. Our covering factor estimates are complementary to the assessment of the covering factor of HVCs about M31 based on the maps (which have a \(5\sigma\) column density sensitivity of \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \sim18.25\) per GBT beam for a FWHM\(= 25\) km s\(^{-1}\), significantly higher than our observations).[^5] Our paper is presented as follows. We summarize the GBT observations and data reduction in §[2](#sec:observations){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:observations"}. We derive covering factors for cool gas about the Andromeda galaxy in §[3](#sec:coveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:coveringfactor"}. In §[4](#sec:comparisons){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:comparisons"} we consider the covering factor results in the context of recent QSO absorption line measurements and numerical simulations. Our discussion and summary follow in §[5](#sec:discussion){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:discussion"} and §[6](#sec:summary){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:summary"}. A metallicity measurement for a sight line passing through the nearby Magellanic Stream (MS) is included in an Appendix. Throughout we assume a distance of 752 kpc to M31. For comparison with other galaxies (simulated and observed), we assume for M31 a stellar mass \(\log M_*/\ensuremath{M_\odot}\relax \approx 11.0\) and a halo mass \(\log M_{\rm h}/\ensuremath{M_\odot}\relax \approx 12.0\).
# GBT 21-cm Observations and Analysis {#sec:observations}
We used the 100-m diameter Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope to take pointed observations toward 48 AGNs projected behind the CGM of M31 as part of NRAO programs GBT15A-328 and GBT14B-436. A map showing the locations of the AGNs is given in Figure [\[fig:map\]](#fig:map){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:map"}, and the details of the AGN sight lines are summarized in Table [\[tab:targets\]](#tab:targets){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:targets"}. These sight lines represent two samples that, together, should provide an unbiased sampling of the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) content of the Andromeda galaxy's gaseous halo. The first sample consists of 25 objects in the Project AMIGA sample, shown with red outlines in Figure [\[fig:map\]](#fig:map){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:map"}. These are selected to be UV-bright AGNs projected within \(\rho \approx 340\) kpc (\(\sim 1.1 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\)) of the center of M31. They are chosen to probe a broad range of impact parameters, with sight lines focused about the major axis, minor axis, and intermediate orientations. They do not sample the impact parameter space randomly (i.e., with weighting \(\propto \rho^2\)). Furthermore, they do not randomly sample the azimuthal distribution, both because of the goals of Project AMIGA (to probe the azimuthal variations systematically) and of a general dearth of identified UV-bright AGNs behind the northern half of M31's CGM . The remaining 23 pointings (shown with black outlines in Figure [\[fig:map\]](#fig:map){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:map"}) sample sight lines toward UV-bright AGNs (and one blank sky direction) that are not scheduled for *HST* observations. These supplemental sight lines were chosen because they may eventually represent quality target for UV follow-up, and because they provide an expansion of our survey in a way that mimics the initial selection. In both cases, the principal criterion for selecting a sight line is the presence of a UV-bright background source. This selection is independent of the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) distribution, and we used no knowledge of the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) structure of M31 in selecting background sources. There is a bias in the distribution of the sources to the southern half of Andromeda's CGM. This is in part due to the increased extinction northward of M31 (at lower Galactic latitudes) and a lack of surveys at those lower latitudes [a result being rectified by QSO searches with, e.g., LAMOST; @huo2013]. We note that if the goal of our program was simply to derive information about the covering factor of low column density \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) in the vicinity of M31, we would not need to search in directions toward background AGNs. However, the present program was designed with the UV observations (or potential future observations) in mind, so that deep \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) observations might help constrain the metallicity of the CGM viewed in UV absorption. The pointed GBT observations were taken with the L-band receiver and have a \(9\farcm1\) primary beam. Each AGN direction was initially observed for a total of 50--60 minutes in individual 10 minute scans. In a few cases difficulties with the receivers caused one of the polarizations to be unusable. We received additional director's discretionary time (program GBT16A-433) to reobserve 12 of the sight lines. Our observations employed a 5.16 MHz bandwidth centered on the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) hyperfine transition and have a native channel spacing of 0.15 km s\(^{-1}\). The typical system temperature of the GBT in this configuration is 18 K at zenith in both linear polarizations. Our observations are consistent with this expectation, with most values in the range \(17.3 \la T_{\rm sys} \la 19.0\) K during our observations. The exceptions are those observations taken toward radio-bright AGNs 3C48 (45 K) and 3C59 (21.9 K) as well as the direction toward 3C66A (24.6 K). None of the other background AGNs is within a factor of 10 of the brightness of 3C48 and 3C59 (which have 1.4 GHz fluxes of \(\sim 16\) and 2 Jy). In-band frequency switching (with a throw of 3 MHz) was used for background subtraction. This provided useable velocity coverage of typically \(-515 \la \ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \la +470\) km s\(^{-1}\). We performed the data reduction within GBTIDL, following for the basic brightness temperature calibration and stray radiation correction and for the scan coaddition and baseline fitting. For each sight line we individually examined each 10 minute scan, including both polarizations. In some cases we interpolated over occasional localized interference, i.e., for interference affecting a small number of channels in a given scan. In a few cases, individual scans were excluded from the coaddition if such interference occupied a large number of channels. The quality of the spectral baselines is one of the limiting factors in setting our column density sensitivity. For some scans, one of the linear polarized receivers had much worse baselines than typical. We excluded these from the subsequent data processing. We fitted spectral baselines separately to each scan and linear polarization over a very broad velocity range before coaddition. We adopted third-to fifth-order polynomials, taking care to exclude regions of potential emission from the fitting. The individual baseline-corrected spectra for a given sight line were then coadded with equal weights after applying an atmospheric extinction correction to each. Finally we corrected for the GBT's main beam efficiency at 21-cm (\(\eta_{\rm mb} = 0.88\)). The final data are binned to \(\sim0.6\) km s\(^{-1}\) channel width. Several examples of our final spectra are shown in Figure [\[fig:spectra\]](#fig:spectra){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:spectra"}. We have performed an automated search for emission at \(\ge 5\sigma\) significance over the velocity range \(-515 \le \ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \le-170\) km s\(^{-1}\) (M31 has a systemic velocity \(v_{\rm sys} =-300\) km s\(^{-1}\) ). Our observations have typical RMS brightness temperature fluctuations of \(\sigma_{\rm b} \approx 8\) mK over the search velocities, with a full range between \(\approx 7\) and 12 mK per 0.6 km s\(^{-1}\) channel. The RMS brightness temperatures for each sight line, derived empirically over the full range of velocities searched for M31 emission, are given in Table [\[tab:targets\]](#tab:targets){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:targets"}. Because we have calculated these empirically they include both the random noise and the effects of imperfect baseline subtractions or local baseline irregularities. For each sight line we calculate detection limits for the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column density assuming the optically thin approximation: \(\ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax = [1.8 \times 10^{18} \ \mbox{cm\)^{-2}\(\ (K km~s\)^{-1}\()}^{-1}] \ \int T_b \, dv\). Any \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) in the CGM of M31 will be optically thin in the 21-cm line. The opacity of the 21-cm line is \(\tau = (5.2 \times 10^{-19} \ \mbox{K km~s\)^{-1}\(\ cm\)^2\(}) \, \ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \, {\rm FWHM}^{-1} \, T_{ex}^{-1}\), where the excitation temperature is generally close to the kinetic temperature of the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\). Thus for the expected \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities \(\approx 10^{18}\) cm\(^{-2}\), FWHM\(\, = 25\) km s\(^{-1}\), and \(T_{ex} > 1000\) K, the peak optical depth will be \(\tau < 2 \times 10^{-5}\). Although the 21-cm measurements were made toward AGN, these almost always contribute a negligible amount of radio continuum emission. Even for the exception, 3C48, which has a continuum antenna temperature \(\sim30\) K at the GBT, the continuum temperature is much less than the 21-cm excitation temperature. It would reduce the 21-cm emission line by \(<1\) mK for the expected 21-cm opacities, a signal that is well below the noise level. Our detection limits are given in Table [\[tab:targets\]](#tab:targets){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:targets"} based on the RMS brightness temperature fluctuations and an assumed line width of 25 km s\(^{-1}\) (FWHM). This yields typical 5\(\sigma\) detection limits of \(\ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \le 4\times10^{17}\) cm\(^{-2}\) per beam or better. Our choice of FWHM is based on the median FWHM in detections of M31 HVC and clump emission from the studies of, ,, and. Our typical sensitivity is equivalent to an \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) mass of \(M_{\rm HI} \sim 10^4\) \(M_\odot\) per beam (\(\sim 800\) \(M_\odot\[/{\rm kpc}^2\)), no matter the scale of the emission. Toward the direction of M31's extended halo, \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) emission from gas associated with the Milky Way and its HVCs, the Magellanic Stream (MS), and M31 can overlap in velocity, as discussed in detail by several works . M31 itself has a systemic velocity in the LSR frame \(\ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax}({\rm M31}) =-300\pm4\) km s\(^{-1}\), and we expect potential CGM emission within \(\sim \pm225\) km s\(^{-1}\) of the systemic velocity, given that more than 90% of the candidate dwarf galaxies in the M31 system lie within this range. The upper velocity limit for our search is set by the likelihood of contamination by emission from relatively local Galactic HVCs, which are confined to \(\ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \ga-170\) km s\(^{-1}\)Ṫhe lower velocity limit corresponds to the limits of the M31 HVC emission found by. None of the emission detected in high-fidelity GBT individual pointings or maps [@thilker2004; @lockman2012; @wolfe2013; @wolfe2016] have found emission at velocities more negative than \(\ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} =-515\) km s\(^{-1}\); neither have absorption line searches for gas associated with the Andromeda galaxy . In addition, most of our spectra do not give access to velocities more negative than \(\ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \la-515\) km s\(^{-1}\) given the adopted frequency-switching offset. At the same time, we can demonstrate that no Ly\(\alpha\) absorption exists in the range \(-1000 \le \ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \le-600\) km s\(^{-1}\) toward the 25 AGNs in the Project AMIGA sample. This is based on a careful search of the blue edge of the Milky Way Ly\(\alpha\) damping wings. Given the strength of this line, we would detect any gas with \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ga 13.5\). This search will be presented in a future paper. In addition to potential contamination by Milky Way HVCs, the MS crosses through this region of the sky at velocities that contaminate searches for M31 emission, as detailed by . The emission from the MS is most important at small Magellanic latitudes (\(b_{\rm MS}\)), although metal ion absorption from the MS can be seen to at least \(b_{\rm MS}\approx\pm30^\circ\) and at Magellanic longitudes \(l_{\rm MS} \ga-110\degr\). We show in Figure [\[fig:map\]](#fig:map){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:map"} the position of \(b_{\rm MS} = 0\degr\) as a dashed curve, and we shade the region between \(b_{\rm MS} = \pm15\degr\). The MS velocities can be predicted following, as described in detail by (see their Figure 3). Such contamination is only important at \(\ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \ga v_{\rm sys}({\rm M31}) \approx-300\) km s\(^{-1}\)Ṡignificant \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) emission over \(-515 \le \ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \le-170\) km s\(^{-1}\) is observed in only 2 of our 48 sightlines (see Figure [\[fig:spectra\]](#fig:spectra){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:spectra"}) at \(5\sigma\) significance. The sight lines toward RBS 2055 and RBS 2061 (the filled points in Figure [\[fig:map\]](#fig:map){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:map"}) show \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) emission at the level of \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \sim 17.8\). The \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) profiles for these directions are shown in Figure [\[fig:spectra\]](#fig:spectra){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:spectra"}, and the line properties are summarized in Table [\[tab:MSdetections\]](#tab:MSdetections){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:MSdetections"}. These objects lie only \(1\fdg2\) apart on the sky; both directions show emission at \(\ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \approx-336\) km s\(^{-1}\). RBS 2055 and RBS 2061 have Magellanic coordinates \((l_{\rm MS}, b_{\rm MS}) = (-113.2, +11.0)\) and \((-112.1, +11.6)\), respectively. Thus, both sight lines lie close to the great circle on which the Magellanic system resides, and the detected emission has velocities close to those expected for the extrapolation of the MS in these directions. Our Project AMIGA COS observations of the sight line towards RBS 2055 also reveal significant metal line absorption. In particular, and unique among the Project AMIGA sight lines, this sight line shows absorption from \(\mbox{\ion{O}{1}}\) \(\lambda1302\) at the same velocity as the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) emission (as well as other metal lines). As we show in the Appendix, the comparison of \(N(\mbox{\ensuremath{\mbox{\ion{O}{1}}}}) / \ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax\), which gives a good measure of O/H with very small if any ionization corrections, yields a metallicity estimate \[O/H\]\(\, = \ensuremath{-0.95\pm0.12}\). This is consistent with the metallicities of the main body of the MS derived by. This agreement in metallicity with the general MS, and the location of these directions relative to the MS, strongly suggests the detected 21-cm emission arises in the extension of the MS across this region. We will assume these directions probe MS gas at \(\ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \approx-336\pm15\) km s\(^{-1}\) moving forward. We note that no \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) emission is detected in these directions outside of those expected for the MS, although we do find absorption from M31's CGM at velocities distinct from the MS in the strongest lines covered by the Project AMIGA COS data (see the Appendix).
# \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) Column Density and Covering Factor Limits {#sec:coveringfactor}
We have in hand a sample of 48 pointings through the halo of the Andromeda galaxy at impact parameters \(\rho < 1.2 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\) with sensitivity to \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) 21-cm emission of \(\ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \approx 2-4\times10^{17}\) cm\(^{-2}\) per beam. The \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) limits for each sight line are shown as a function of impact parameter in Figure [\[fig:columnrho\]](#fig:columnrho){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:columnrho"} and reported in Table [\[tab:targets\]](#tab:targets){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:targets"}. To encompass the range of sensitivites, we adopt a survey search sensitivity of \(\ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \le 4\times10^{17}\) cm\(^{-2}\) (\(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \le 17.60\)). The \(5\sigma\) upper limits are shown for each sight line, with the exception of the two MS detections discussed in §[2](#sec:observations){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:observations"}, for which the detected MS emission column densities are shown. Outside of the velocity range \(-370 \la \ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \la-300\) km s\(^{-1}\), these two sight lines show no emission to limits similar to those observed along the other sight lines (see Table [\[tab:targets\]](#tab:targets){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:targets"}). Clouds with \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.6\) could be present on scales smaller than the 2 kpc diameter GBT beam and remain undetected, as our limits apply to the beam-averaged column density. Indeed, high-resolution observations of HVCs in the inner regions of the halo (\(\rho \la 50\) kpc) by have demonstrated that at least some M31 HVCs have smaller sizes (\(\langle D \rangle \sim 1\) kpc) and higher central column densities (\(\langle \ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \rangle \approx 4\times10^{19}\) cm\(^{-2}\)). Objects like these specific clouds would be readily detected by our observations on the basis of their masses (\(\langle M_{\rm HI} \rangle \approx 10^5\) \(M_\odot\)), but there may still be small-scale clouds that lie below the detection limits of our data. In fact, the photoionization simulations by suggested relatively small sizes for the \(z\la1\) LLSs in that work (the vast majority of which have \(N(\mbox{\ensuremath{\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}}}) \la 10^{17}\) cm\(^{-2}\)), with only 11/25 of the systems they modeled having sizes \(>1\) kpc. We will discuss this issue further below. Also shown on Figure [\[fig:columnrho\]](#fig:columnrho){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:columnrho"} are predictions from the recent "zoom-in" galaxy simulations. The blue curve shows the median \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) profile from the `ALL_Efb_e001_5ESN` of, which they note best fits recent COS observations of the CGM about \(z\la1\) galaxies while producing "unrealistic" results for the stellar component of a typical low-redshift galaxy. The cyan shading about the line represents the 95% confidence range of the measurements drawn from their simulation. Similar results from the NIHAO simulations of are shown in the dashed lines. These represent the median profiles of their mock \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) distributions for individual galaxies with stellar masses \(\log M_*/\ensuremath{M_\odot}\relax = 10.66\) and 10.89, those closest to M31. (Here we do not show the quantiles, but they are similar in magnitude to those shown for the simulations.) The main point in this comparison of both the and simulations with our results is that \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) about a typical simulated galaxy falls off quite rapidly, save for the filaments and smaller-scale structures tracing flows through the CGM. The principal result of our work is a calculation of the cumulative covering factor of \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) as a function of impact parameter from M31. We calculate the covering factor from our data assuming a binomial distribution. We follow in assessing the likelihood function for values of the covering factor, \(f_c(\le \rho)\), given the number of detections (successes) against the total sample (number of sight lines within a given impact parameter). demonstrates that the normalized likelihood function useful for calculating (Bayesian) confidence intervals on a binomial distribution with a non-informative (uniform) prior follows a beta distribution. We refer the reader to for a detailed justification of this approach, which is particularly useful for providing robust results in cases of small samples (particularly important at small impact parameter in our work). The results of our covering factor calculations are given in Table [\[tab:coveringfactor\]](#tab:coveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:coveringfactor"} and shown in Figure [\[fig:coveringfactor\]](#fig:coveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:coveringfactor"}. We report *cumulative* covering factors: each point represents the covering factor for all impact parameters less than the one considered, \(f_c(\le \rho)\), rather than the differential covering factors (i.e., we calculate the covering factors for \(\le \rho\) rather than for \(\rho \pm \Delta \rho\)). Given the lack of detections, we report one-sided confidence limits (the 90% quantile of the distribution) in Table [\[tab:coveringfactor\]](#tab:coveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:coveringfactor"}.[^6] We emphasize that the results for each impact parameter are not independent, as they include the same measurements as those at smaller impact parameter. Thus the results summarized in Figure [\[fig:coveringfactor\]](#fig:coveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:coveringfactor"} do not give information on the *distribution* of covering factors within M31's halo, only on the 90% confidence limits to the covering factor within a given impact parameter. \[For interested parties, the limits on the *differential* covering factors are \(f_c^\prime \le 0.162\), 0.188, 0.099 at 90% confidence for 100 kpc-wide bins centered on \(\rho = 50\), 150, 250 kpc, respectively.\] We also note that our covering factors are only appropriate for regions outside of the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) disk of M31 (i.e., in the CGM). We define positions associated with the disk as those that would fall on a projected circle of radius \(r=30\) kpc at an inclination angle of \(i\approx 78^\circ\). We also show in Figure [\[fig:coveringfactor\]](#fig:coveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:coveringfactor"} the results we would obtain if we assume the two \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) detections are in fact associated with the CGM of M31, although we stress that this seems highly unlikely (see Appendix). The covering factors derived under this assumption are summarized in Table [\[tab:MScoveringfactor\]](#tab:MScoveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:MScoveringfactor"} at impact parameters for which the results are different than those in Table [\[tab:coveringfactor\]](#tab:coveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:coveringfactor"}. We give three values in Table [\[tab:MScoveringfactor\]](#tab:MScoveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:MScoveringfactor"}: \(f_c(\le \rho)\]_{0.1}\), \(f_c(\le \rho)\[_{0.5}\), \(f_c(\le \rho)\]_{0.9}\), which correspond to the 10%, 50% (median), and 90% quantiles for the covering factor distributions [again using the incomplete beta generator discussed by @cameron2011]. We find the covering factor within \(R_{\rm vir}\) is \(f_c(\le \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax) \le 0.051\) (90% confidence limit). Our ability to provide meaningful constraints is dependent on the number of sight lines probed, and thus the limits are not strong in the inner regions where \(<10\) sight lines were observed (see Figure [\[fig:coveringfactor\]](#fig:coveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:coveringfactor"}, top). Even though we do not detect \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) emission in our survey, one should not be under the impression that there is *no* high column density gas associated with M31's CGM, as have found clumps of high column density gas in the halo (in some cases to \(\rho\sim100\) kpc from the center of M31). However, any such gas must have a very small covering factor at, e.g., \(\rho \ga 50\) kpc., for example, find \(\sim95\%\) of the HVCs in their map of a region of the M31 CGM are confined to \(\rho \la 50\) kpc (for \(M_{\rm HVC} \la 1.3\times10^5\) \(M_\odot\) at \(5\sigma\)). In our data, gas at column densities \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ga 17.6\) can be present on scales smaller than the 2 kpc-diameter beam and remain undetected, so long as the total mass is less than our typical sensitivity of \(M_{\rm HI} \approx 10^4\) \(M_\odot\). Figure [\[fig:coveringfactor\]](#fig:coveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:coveringfactor"} also shows an assessment of the covering factor of HVCs about M31 by [based on the maps of @thilker2004]. The blue curve in Figure [\[fig:coveringfactor\]](#fig:coveringfactor){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:coveringfactor"} shows these results rescaled for our assumed distance and transformed into the cumulative covering factors used here based on 's fit. The results beyond \(\rho \approx 60\) kpc are an extrapolation of that fit. This fit applies only to the HVC component as defined by. It excludes the disk of M31. Our new limits are compatible with the HVC covering factors, although the HVCs were observed over an area in which we have few measurements and limited constraints. The HVCs (and "bridge" material) observed about M31 have typical column densities in excess of \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ga 18\) and masses \(M_{\rm HI} \ga 10^5\) \(M_\odot\), which would be readily detectable by our observations if such material were common in our survey area. While we discuss our results in the general context of the CGM, our definition of CGM is inclusive of "high velocity clouds." Our limits show there is not an abundance of HVCs beyond the mapping limits of those earlier works. A caveat is that our covering factor determinations are limited to \(-515 \le \ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \le-170\) km s\(^{-1}\), the lower end set by frequency-switching limits and the upper end set to avoid contamination by Galactic HVCs.
# Comparison with Recent CGM Surveys and Simulations {#sec:comparisons}
## Comparison with Recent Observations {#sec:obscomparison}
The nearest comparison to our measurements from the QSO absorption line literature are those of the COS-Halos survey. The original survey targeted AGNs projected within \(\rho \sim 150\) kpc of 44 \(\sim\)\(L^*\) galaxies at \(z\sim0.2\), with detection of \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) Lyman-series absorption in nearly every case [40/44; see @tumlinson2013]. Such absorption line observations can be sensitive to column densities as low as \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \approx 13\). Most of the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) detections in the original survey had \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities that were either orders of magnitude below our detection limits or that were not able to be determined due to the strong saturation of the available Lyman series lines. Follow-up measurements of the Lyman break in some of these these galaxies have recently been completed, providing stronger constraints on their \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities. We compare our results with this most recent update. Figure [\[fig:CHcomparison\]](#fig:CHcomparison){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CHcomparison"} compares the updated COS-Halos measurements with our measurements in the halo of the Andromeda galaxy. The top panel shows \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) versus \(\rho\) from. All of the COS-Halos sight lines are considered, though many of the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) columns (19/44) fall below the lower bounds of this plot. Several of the COS-Halos sight lines have only broad constraints, with lower limits from saturated Lyman series lines or a saturated Lyman break and upper limits from the lack of damping wings on Ly\(\alpha\) or Ly\(\beta\). argue these systems should be treated as having a flat probability distribution in \(\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) between their lower and upper bounds. We adopt this recommendation, plotting these systems in Figure [\[fig:CHcomparison\]](#fig:CHcomparison){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CHcomparison"} as extended error brackets (representing the 95% confidence interval) without central values. There are several caveats to note when comparing our M31 measurements to those of COS-Halos. The COS-Halos sample probes a broad range of galaxy mass/luminosity centered roughly on "\(L^*\)." The estimated halo masses for the COS-Halos survey cover the range \(11.5 \la \log M_{\rm h} / \ensuremath{M_\odot}\relax \la 13.7\), with stellar masses \(9.6 \la \log M_* / \ensuremath{M_\odot}\relax \la 11.5\); these should be compared with the estimates for M31 of \(\log M_{\rm h} / \ensuremath{M_\odot}\relax \approx 12.0\) and \(\log M_* / \ensuremath{M_\odot}\relax \approx 11.0\). Thus, we are comparing one galaxy to an ensemble of galaxies with a broad range in masses. Furthermore, due to this broad mass range, the relevant physical scales can vary significantly. We have chosen to present all COS-Halos measurements and results relative to their normalized impact parameter, \(\rho / \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\), which is shown across the top of the figures.[^7] For this reason some of the COS-Halos measurements will appear at impact parameters larger than the survey limit of \(\rho \la 150\) kpc, as the more massive systems in COS-Halos have virial radii larger than that of M31. The bottom panel of Figure [\[fig:CHcomparison\]](#fig:CHcomparison){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CHcomparison"} shows a comparison of the covering factors derived for the results in comparison with ours for M31. The COS-Halos results are based on a Monte Carlo sampling of the full \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) distribution over a given (normalized) impact parameter range. We do this to account for the systems with lower and upper bounds on the column density that straddle our detection limit (though we have verified that it gives results indistinguishable from the @cameron2011 approach if we consider only systems clearly above our detection limit). For each impact parameter considered, we create an \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) distribution that is the sum of the probability distribution functions (PDFs) describing each of the COS-Halos measurements. The direct measurements in have reasonably-symmetric errors, and we adopt a normal distribution for each in \(\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\). For the bounded values from, we follow their recommendation and treat each as having a flat PDF between the limiting columns. For upper limits, we assume a flat PDF between \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax = 10.0\) and the quoted upper limits. To calculate the covering factor within a given impact parameter, we create 10,000 realizations of the observations, drawing the same number of \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities as sight lines within that range from the full \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) distribution. For each realization we calculate the covering factor as the fraction of the mock sight lines with \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.6\). From the full sample of covering factors, we derive the quantiles of the distribution. The bottom panel of Figure [\[fig:CHcomparison\]](#fig:CHcomparison){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CHcomparison"} shows the results, where the central values give the median of the distribution with error bars representing the \[10%, 90%\] quantiles (i.e., the 80% confidence interval). The implied covering factor of gas with \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.6\) for COS-Halos galaxies within \(0.5 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\) is \(f_c(\le 0.5 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax) = 0.26\) \[0.18, 0.37\] (median and \[10%, 90%\] quantiles), and it is \(\approx0.36\) within \(0.33 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\). (Although they do not normalize to the virial radius, these results are similar to those given by, who note the covering factor at \(\rho \le 75\) kpc is \(\ga 50\%\) for \(\log \ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ga 17.2\).) The COS-Halos survey thus shows a striking prevalence of high column density \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) absorption systems. A sizeable fraction of the COS-Halos absorption line measurements (at least 8/44) have columns in excess of our detection limit, \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax = 17.6\). The mean \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) for gas with \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.6\) from COS-Halos is \(\log \langle \ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \rangle_{\ge17.6} = 19.15\) (with a geometric mean \(\langle \log \ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \rangle_{\ge17.6} = 18.65\)). This gas is detected frequently enough that the mean \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) drawn from our construction of the full \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) distribution of is \(\log \langle \ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \rangle = 18.51\). In roughly 30% of the COS-Halos galaxies, gas with \(\log \langle \ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \rangle_{\ge17.6} = 19.15\) is observed within \(0.5 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\). Any of our observations intercepting gas with this column density would readily detect such gas if it covered 30% of our 2 kpc beams. Thus, if the mean COS-Halos statistics are a fair representation of the structure of \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) on small scales--specifically as good reprentations of the fraction of a 2 kpc diameter beam covered by any high column density gas clouds--we should have detected any clouds having high \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) columns like those seen in the COS-Halos measurements. Indeed, gas with \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax = 19.15\) would need to cover \(\le 2.8\%\) of our beam to avoid detection, some \(10\times\) lower than implied by the COS-Halos covering factors. It is the case that the radial distributions of sight lines in COS-Halos and our sample are weighted differently. The high column density \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) absorbers in COS-Halos are at \(\rho \la 0.33 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\) (Figure [\[fig:CHcomparison\]](#fig:CHcomparison){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CHcomparison"}). Even considering only this range in impact parameter, however, our M31 covering factors \(f_c(\le 0.33 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax)\) aren't consistent with those in the COS-Halos galaxies. Thus, it is difficult to reconcile the ensemble results from COS-Halos with our measurements of \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) in the CGM of the Andromeda galaxy. The COS-Halos galaxies that show gas at \(\log \ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.6\) have a mean stellar mass \(\langle \log M_*/\ensuremath{M_\odot}\relax \rangle \approx 10.9\) (full range 10.2 to 11.3), so this high column density gas resides in the halos of galaxies similar to M31. It is perhaps noteworthy that the COS-Halos survey attempted to select against pairs of \(L^*\) galaxies, such as the M31-Milky Way pair. Thus, if M31 were at \(z\sim0.2\), it may not have been been included in the COS-Halos survey. If its Local Group membership plays a role in determining the covering factor, the M31/COS-Halos comparison could be inappropriate (although the halos in the Local Group-like simulations of @nuza2014 show results similar to those of the single-halo simulations discussed below). However, because the initial selection was done using photometric redshifts, this selection against galaxy pairs was not as clear cut as initially intended. In general metal absorption lines show higher covering factors about galaxies than our \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) 21-cm measurements about M31. Metal lines are found with covering factors \(>60\%-75\%\) within \(\sim0.5 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\) [e.g., @chen2010; @nielsen2013; @stocke2013; @werk2014; @borthakur2016]. Indeed, find covering factors near unity for \(\mbox{\ion{C}{2}}\) and \(\mbox{\ion{Si}{3}}\) absorption within \(\rho \la 0.5 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\), albeit with a very small sample. Preliminary results from Project AMIGA still support a high covering factor in these ions (N. Lehner et al. in prep). The metal lines show higher covering factors in part due to the greater sensitivity of absorption line techniques to low column density gas (e.g., Ly\(\alpha\) absorption lines are detectable to \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax < 12.5\)), but it is also a reflection of the general ionization level of gas in the CGM. A majority of the cool and warm gas (\(10^{4-5} \le T \le T_{\rm vir}\)) in galaxy halos is significantly ionized, including the LLS-like regime that we are probing [@lehner2013; @fumagalli2016; @lehner2016]. The metal ion covering factors about M31 are not that different than those found about COS-Halos and other galaxies. But, depending on the degree of saturation within the detected metals, we should not necessarily expect to see the same covering factor in high \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column density gas. We have compared the measurements along the three sight lines with \(\rho \la 50\) kpc relative to M31 to the COS-Halos results. All of the COS-Halos with high \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities (\(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.6\)) also have significantly higher , , and columns than the three inner-halo Andromeda sight lines. These COS-Halos systems have \(>2-3\times\) higher columns than M31 (all are lower limits due to saturation in the COS-Halos sight lines) and \(\sim10\times\) higher column densities. Thus, it appears the COS-Halos sight lines simply probe higher column densities of low-ionization gas, including \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\). This is hidden by the comparison of metal ion covering factors because the metal absorption lines are so sensitive and quick to saturate. The metal / \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) ratios in M31 appear to be consistent with those found by COS-Halos.
## Comparison with Recent Simulations
The covering factors of \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) and metal ions are considered in a number of simulation papers [@fumagalli2011; @cafg2011; @shen2012; @fernandez2012; @fumagalli2014; @cafg2015; @suresh2015; @cafg2016; @gutcke2016; @liang2016]. The motivation for extracting this quantity from simulations arises in part because this is an observable quantity, but also because the covering factor can respond to changes in the accretion rate and feedback intensity in a galaxy and the numerical approaches adopted. For example, the covering factors of LLS absorption can change by factors of \(>2\) depending on the wind models adopted or presence of AGN activity. Most commonly the predictions are made for \(z\sim2\), not only because the simulations are less expensive to run to these redshifts, but also because there are more measurements of the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) covering factor at high redshift than at \(z\sim0\), which typically requires space-based observations. At the same time, the choice of the limiting \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column for reporting the covering factors varies widely, depending on the focus of the simulations. With this in mind, we compare our observations of M31 with the recent simulations reported in , who investigated the relationship of \(z<1\) LLSs to galaxies; these halos were simulated as part of the FIRE project. Figure [\[fig:coveringfactorModels\]](#fig:coveringfactorModels){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:coveringfactorModels"} compares our results with an ensemble of cosmological zoom simulations from , shown with the green curve and shaded regions. The analysis of produce simulated column density distributions for their ensemble of galaxies, which they found to be consistent with the cosmological incidence rates of low-redshift (\(0 \le z \le 1.0\)) LLSs at \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.5\) and \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax\ge 17.2\). These simulations however have difficulties matching the observed metallicity distribution of low-z LLSs. The results summarized in Figure [\[fig:coveringfactorModels\]](#fig:coveringfactorModels){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:coveringfactorModels"} are from the four halos studied in whose final (\(z = 0\)) masses are \(11.8 \le \log M_{\rm h}/M_\odot \le 12.1\) (simulations m11.9a, m12i, m12q, m12v of ). The simulated halos have been projected into a \(512^3\) grid spanning \(2.4\times R_{\rm vir}\) (with cell sizes \(\sim1.0\)--1.2 kpc) for each simulation. We derived cumulative covering factors for \(\log N(\mbox{\ensuremath{\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}}}) \ge 17.6\) using normalized impact parameters \(\rho/R_{\rm vir}\) as we did in the COS-Halos comparison. We consider each of the simulated galaxies from three orthogonal perspectives and use 11 snapshots per simulation over the redshift range \(0 \le z \le 0.25\). Thus there are 132 total models that go into calculating \(f_c(\le \rho)\) and its quantiles for each impact parameter bin (which are sampled in steps of \(0.1 \, \rho/\ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\)). The thick curve in Figure [\[fig:coveringfactorModels\]](#fig:coveringfactorModels){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:coveringfactorModels"} shows the median of the results, the darkest shading shows the interquartile range (from the 25% to 75% quantiles), and the lightest shading shows the 5% to 95% quantile range. The median results show that the covering factor from these simulations of high column density gas around galaxies in the mass range analyzed is generally relatively small, with simulated median covering factors \(f_c (\le 0.5 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax ) = 0.037\) and \(f_c(\le R_{\rm vir}) = 0.011\). These compare with our upper limits of \(<0.11\) and \(<0.051\) at 90% confidence for the same two impact parameters; they are significantly lower than the results from COS-Halos at these same impact parameters. We point out that the simulations display significant variations in the covering factors. The variations are a result of both strong time-dependence related to wind and accretion activity (in the case of the ) as well as variations between different galaxy halos [@cafg2015; @muratov2015]. The highest covering factors in the simulations arise in the inner regions of the galaxies. We do not sample \(\rho \la 50\) kpc well with our 21-cm observations due to our focus on directions with known UV-bright AGN (we have only 4 directions in this regime). In the inner regions (within \(\rho \approx 0.33 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax \approx 100\) kpc) the FIRE simulations from seem to be in good agreement with the covering factors derived for M31's HVC population. Other simulations find results similar to those of . For example, find \(f_c\approx 0\%-10\%\) for \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.2\) in simulations of M31-like mass galaxies at \(z\sim0\), where the range represents the variations seen in simulations of different galaxies. presented a high-resolution simulation of a single M31-like halo, and they found \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) covering factors reasonably consistent with the distribution for \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.7\). considered a Local Group-like configuration of halos; they find very high covering factors in the inner regions of those two halos, and results that are generally consistent with our observations. Our measurements in M31 are consistent with the median set of simulations in all of these cases, showing a quite low covering factor of optically-thick \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) when assessed within \(R_{\rm vir}\).
# Discussion {#sec:discussion}
In this work, we have investigated the frequency of optically-thick gas with \(\log \ensuremath{N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ge 17.6\) about the local \(\ensuremath{L^*}\) galaxy M31. On the basis of GBT searches for 21-cm emission with a 2 kpc beam, we find a minimal covering factor of such gas in the halo of the Andromeda galaxy. We derive a covering factor within the virial radius of \(f_c (\le \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax) < 0.051\). Our limits on the cumulative covering factor are not particularly strong in the inner halo (esp., \(\rho \la 0.25 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\)), where we have few pointings. Complementary information exists from the previous HVC results within \(\rho \la 0.2 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\). There is some discrepancy in our assessment with previous work on the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) environment of the M31/M33 system. As noted earlier, the initial maps by seem to show more wide-spread emission than is present.[^8] More recently, have emphasized the potential for blending of high-velocity M31 structures with the Milky Way's 21-cm emission. They attempted to decompose the complicated region around M31 with guidance from continuities in the "difference second moment map," arguing that several very large \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) complexes within \(\rho \sim 80\) kpc are associated with M31. These complexes span tens of kpc at the distance of M31. We would not have included them as detections in our survey because they lie outside of our velocity range. The structures are at \(-150 \la \ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \la-100\) km s\(^{-1}\) (within \(\approx200\) km s\(^{-1}\) of M31's systemic velocity), whereas our survey is restricted to \(-515 \le \ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \le-170\) km s\(^{-1}\) in order to avoid contamination by Galactic HVC emission. Furthermore, none of our pointings directly intersect the clouds they identify, a by-product of our low sampling density at small impact parameters. Assuming all of the clouds identify are indeed associated with M31, their Figure 7 implies covering factors just consistent with our limits. For example, their map implies \(f_c(\le 0.33 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax) \approx 0.2\) (ignoring emission within 25 kpc in order to exclude the disk), which compares with our limit \(f_c(\le 0.33 \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax) \le 0.16\) at 90% confidence. This covering factor estimate is dominated by the two large structures that they identify on opposite sides of the galaxy (their clouds *a* and *b*). It is a bit disconcerting that the two structures, separated by many tens of kpc, both lie at the extreme positive velocities expected for circumgalactic material about M31 (both with \(\ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \approx-115\) km s\(^{-1}\)). It is not clear why two structures separated by more than the diameter of M31's disk should have the exact same extreme velocity. The covering factors implied by the are \(\sim2\times\) higher than those of at the same impact parameters. This discrepancy is wholly connected to the issues of blending with Milky Way HVC gas at \(\ensuremath{v_{\rm LSR}\relax} \ga-170\) km s\(^{-1}\). While attempt to solve it through a unique approach, it is difficult to verify their results with other means. In general our limits to the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) covering factor are quite consistent with the low values expected from cosmological zoom simulations of individual galaxies at \(z \approx 0\). With no detections, we do not have a valid characterization of the shape of the \(f_c\) distribution about M31, although the work by provides a fit to the HVC covering factor within \(\sim60\) kpc. Some of the simulated galaxies show higher \(f_c\) than is observed in M31, as captured in the simulations ranges shown in Figure [\[fig:coveringfactorModels\]](#fig:coveringfactorModels){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:coveringfactorModels"}. This is a result of the halo-to-halo variations as well as the significant temporal variations within a single halo [@rahmati2015; @cafg2015]. Thus, while the covering fraction of optically-thick gas about M31 is not in conflict with the simulations, it is a single sample from a specific time. It may be drawn from a broad distribution like those seen in the simulations. As discussed in §[4.1](#sec:obscomparison){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:obscomparison"}, our results appear discrepant from the COS-Halos galaxies [@tumlinson2013; @prochaska2017]. There are very few other works that put strong constraints on the covering factor of optically-thick gas about low-redshift galaxies. There could be a multitude of physical reasons for the difference between M31 and COS-Halos: 1) M31 could have experienced significant evolution in the last 2.5 Gyr, the time since the typical redshift of the COS-Halos galaxies; 2) "green valley" galaxies with star formation rates like M31, which are not well sampled by COS-Halos, may have distinct CGM properties; 3) the presence of M31 in a group with another massive spiral, which would have been (mildly) selected against in the COS-Halos sample, may affect its CGM. However, it's unlikely we could distinguish these effects from simple stochastic variations for a single galaxy. The environment of M31 could plausibly play a role in shaping its CGM. found a smaller detection rate (covering factor) of for galaxies in high density environments (assessed over \(\rho \approx 1.5\) Mpc). They do not find a corresponding difference in \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) covering factor, but their dynamic range in \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) is small due to saturation of Ly\(\alpha\) (they cannot probe columns higher than \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \sim 14.5\)). However, the Local Group would not be included in their high density category, as only 2-3 galaxies would make their luminosity cut (\(M_r <-19\) mag) for identifying galaxies in their density counting scheme. We note that have presented simulations of a Local Group-like pair of halos, both of which show high covering factors. They find near unity (differential) covering factors for gas at \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ga 17.85\) to 30-50 kpc in their two halos. However, this is based on only one pair of halos seen at a single time, so we cannot yet draw strong conclusions based on these simulations. In general higher covering fractions are found from metal absorption line searches. Several studies of strong \(\mbox{\ion{Mg}{2}}\) absorption (typically \(W_r \ga 0.3\) mÅ) have found quite high covering factors (e.g., \(>0.6\)) within \(\sim\ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax\), even for relatively massive galaxies like M31. Some of this difference has to do with the broad range of \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities probed by \(\mbox{\ion{Mg}{2}}\) absorption, which can trace gas over nearly 5 orders of magnitude in \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) [gas with \(\log N(\mbox{\ensuremath{\mbox{\ion{Mg}{2}}}}) \sim 13\)--\(W_r(2796) \sim 0.3\) mÅ-can probe solar metallicity gas with \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \sim 16\) or damped Ly\(\alpha\) systems with \(<1/300\) of the solar metallicity; @wotta2016]. We note that searched for the signature of \(\mbox{\ion{Mg}{2}}\) and other low-ion absorption from the halo of M31 using low-resolution COS spectra. They probed impact parameters \(13 \la \rho \la 112\) kpc with 10 AGNs, finding absorption in four sight lines, all of which reside at \(\rho \la 40\) kpc and within the \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \sim 18.3\) contours of the 21-cm measurements. Their observations, sensitive to \(W_r(2796) \sim 0.3-0.5\) Å, targeted AGNs projected along M31's major axis. The lack of absorption in their four targets at \(40 \la \rho \la 112\) kpc is perhaps not surprising given the small number of sight lines and the low covering factor of high column density gas we find (their low-resolution observations have sensitivity to only \(W_r(2796) \sim 300\) mÅ, whereas Project AMIGA's sensitivity is \(\sim20\) mÅ). Roughly half of the sight lines observed in this work have been observed by *HST* /COS at intermediate resolution (G130M+G160M) as part of Project AMIGA. These observations, a subset of which were published by , are sensitive to relatively weak metal line absorption, notably in transitions from the ions \(\mbox{\ion{C}{2}}\), , \(\mbox{\ion{Si}{2}}\), \(\mbox{\ion{Si}{3}}\), . The preliminary data from this program suggest a quite high metal line covering factor. One of the initial goals for Project AMIGA GBT was to provide an \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) reference for potential metallicity estimates, since Ly\(\alpha\) absorption from the Andromeda galaxy is swamped by the Galactic absorption trough. Unfortunately, with only upper limits on \(N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})\) coupled with potential beam-dilution effects, we cannot provide a hydrogen reference for the metallicity determination. Without the hydrogen reference, determining the metallicities along these sight lines will not be possible [on this point we disagree with the recent work of @koch2015]. Better constraining the covering factor in the inner regions of M31's CGM may be readily accomplished by simply observing more sight lines (and more GBT observations are forthcoming). The \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) maps of as analyzed by provide some guidance in this inner region, albeit at worse mass sensitivity than the current observations and only at \(\rho \la 50\) kpc. Pushing below our current \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column density limits, which are in the range of \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \sim 17.4\) to 17.6 at \(5\sigma\), is in principle possible. However, in many of the cases presented here the limiting factor in the \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) sensitivity is the quality of the spectral baselines. The GBT baselines are already among the best available, but we are working near the limit for the current instrumentation.
# Summary {#sec:summary}
We have used the Green Bank Observatory's 100-m Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope to search for 21-cm emission from the CGM of our neighbor M31. We detect no \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) emission, with column density limits that overlap studies of QSO absorption line experiments (notably the LLSs). Our principal conclusions are as follows.
1. We constrain the covering factor of optically-thick \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) with \(\ensuremath{\log N(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}})}\relax \ga 17.6\) about M31 to be \(f_c (\le \ensuremath{R_{\rm vir}}\relax) < 0.051\) (90% confidence).
2. Our covering factor limits for these high \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities are much lower than those found for metal lines about \(L^*\) galaxies, including M31 .
3. The covering factors derived here are also discrepant from recent measurements by the COS-Halos project at the same \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) column densities. The origin of this difference is not clear. It may be related to characteristics of M31 that are not represented in the COS-Halos sample, although the difference could also be consistent with stochastic variations in M31's CGM with time.
4. The covering factors of optically-thick \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) about M31 are consistent those found in recent cosmological zoom simulations.
Part of this manuscript was written at the 2016 Arthur M. Wolfe Symposium in Astrophysics hosted by IMPS of UC Santa Cruz Department of Astronomy. We thank the Esalen Institute for its great setting and wonderful hospitality during that retreat. Support for HST Program number 14268 was provided by NASA through a grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Incorporated, under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Some of this work was supported by NSF grants AST-1212012 and AST-1517353 to Notre Dame and JHU. DJP recognizes partial support from NSF CAREER grant AST-1149491. Contributions by ZH and CAFG were additionally supported through NSF grants AST-1412836 and AST-1517491 and through NASA grant NNX15AB22G. This research made use of Astropy, a community-developed core Python package for Astronomy, and the matplotlib plotting package.
[^1]: These are not necessarily mutually exclusive, as ram pressure may play a role in removing wind-driven matter from the satellite's halo.
[^2]: The Green Bank Observatory is a facility of the National Science foundation operated under a cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.
[^3]: Not to be confused with the AMIGA survey (Analysis of the interstellar Medium in Isolated GAlaxies, PI Lourdes Verdes-Montenegro); `http://amiga.iaa.es`.
[^4]: The results initially given in are too high by a factor of \(\sim10\) due to an unfortunate error.
[^5]: discuss several variations of their datacube, each smoothed to different velocity and spatial resolutions. Here we give the limits associated with their higher-resolution data, with a \(\approx13\farcm65\) beam and 18 km s\(^{-1}\) velocity channels. Their limits imply a mass sensitivity of \(M_{\ensuremath{\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}}} \le 3.5\times 10^{4}\) \(M_\odot\) per beam.
[^6]: Specifically, we've used 's Equation 3, determining the value of \(f_c(\le \rho)\) (equivalent to that equations's upper bound \(p_u\)) for which the integration of the beta distribution between \(f_c(\le \rho)\) and 1 yields a normalized probability of 0.1.
[^7]: The results of our comparison are not fundamentally different if we consider the results with \(\rho\) rather than the normalized coordinate.
[^8]: These works generally show a very low detection rate in their searches, consistent with our low covering factor determinations. However, because these works studied areas specifically to address previous potential detections of \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) by, their observations are not suitable for general covering factor calculations, as they may be biased in favor of \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) detections. Nonetheless, these efforts all support a small covering factor on small scales, even in directions suspected originally to have \(\mbox{\ion{H}{1}}\) emission. | {'timestamp': '2017-08-23T02:06:37', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01893', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01893'} |
# INTRODUCTION
Present day halo globular clusters are a tracer population in the dark matter of the Milky Way, providing important insights into the assembly history of the galaxy and some of the first observational evidence for galactic dark matter. proposed a basic conceptual picture in which star clusters formed in "transient protogalactic fragments\" which accrete onto the developing galaxy to form the stellar and dark matter halo of the Milky Way galaxy. This picture is now elaborated within general models of hierarchical galaxy formation within the Cold Dark Matter (CDM) cosmology. Globular clusters evolve through the gravitational interactions of their constituent stars and the influence of external gravitational fields. Encounters between individual stars, binaries and more complex bound units, systematically increases the binding energy of the central region causing the outer regions of the star cluster to expand. The external gravitational field, which can often be approximated with a tidal tensor, set a distance beyond which cluster stars are no longer bound to the cluster. And, time varying tidal fields, from either other massive sub-halos or peri-galacticon passage, pump energy into cluster stars. The internal two-body relaxation time increases with increasing mass for the same orbit within a galaxy. Consequently, lower mass clusters lose mass more quickly, systematically depleting the lower mass clusters so that over the lifetime of the galaxy a wide range of initial mass functions come to resemble the nearly universally observed log-normal mass distribution . The stars that become unbound from their parent cluster are pulled away in tidal streams that are offset in angular momentum so lead and trail the cluster in its orbit. In principle a stream provides a complete history of the globular cluster and the properties of the potential along its orbit. The density of stars along a tidal stream provides an empirical estimate of the mass loss from its parent cluster, which in principle could be used to reconstruct the cluster, including completely dissolved clusters. The simulations here will shed light on some of the difficulties that will need to be overcome to allow even a statistical reconstruction of the history of interest. The thin components of streams are sensitive indicators of the low mass sub-halos that the LCDM power spectrum predicts should be orbiting in the halos of the galaxy . Current methods of analysis have concentrated on the relative simple streams that develop in a static potential, which may require modification to take into account the time variations of the gravitational fields in which the stream develops. High resolution gas dynamical galaxy formation simulations are beginning to explore formation of dense star clusters within a galaxy. The current spatial resolution of the resulting clusters is not yet adequate to follow the dynamical evolution of individual stars in the clusters. The study of star clusters remains a challenging numerical problem, largely addressed through the program of gravitational n-body codes without particle softening. The current version, Nbody6 and its specialized variants, is a highly realistic cluster code, which allows external fields to be described with an externally supplied time varying tidal tensor. The numbers and masses of globular clusters at high redshift are of interest for the reionization of the universe via the the ionizing radiation from their massive stars present at early times, and, the creation of binary black holes which inspiral to merge and emit gravitational waves at low redshift. The low metal abundance of globular cluster stars reduces the stellar winds of the high mass stars which can lead to stellar remnant black holes in the \(30{\rm\,M_\odot}\) range. The black holes sink via gravitational interactions into the central regions where processes of binary exchange and binary gravitational hardening over a Gyr or so can put together massive binary black holes (BBHs) that will inspiral over a Hubble time to merge. BBH merger rates predicted from the current population of globular clusters generally come up somewhat low relative to the currently measured LIGO event rates. If the high redshift population of globular clusters were significantly larger than the low redshift numbers on which current predictions are based. It is interesting that both BBHs and reionization may be connected through the high mass stars in high redshift globular clusters. To better understand the history of globular clusters and their tidal streams this paper follows a population of globular clusters formed at high redshift in the sub-galactic dark matter halos that merge over time to create a galactic halo. The evolution of a pre-galactic dark matter distribution drawn from a larger cosmological simulation to form a galaxy's dark matter halo is a well understood n-body simulation problem. Here such a simulation is augmented through the insertion of dense star clusters in the central regions of the pre-galactic sub-halos. The added star clusters contribute so little mass to the overall simulation, less than 0.01% here, that the dark matter history is barely affected. The simulation is conceptually started at a time after the massive stars in the clusters have evolved and dispersed any surrounding gas so that hydrodynamical effects no longer play a role. The star particles use a gravitational softening to speed up the calculation, requiring that the expected level of two-body relaxation between stars in the clusters be added in with a Monte Carlo velocity perturbation scheme. Questions of interest here are to what degree the visible tidal streams be used to reconstruct the initial dense stellar cluster distribution, and, what is the character of dark matter sub-halo induced gaps in these streams. Both of these questions can be answered without a high precision cluster mass loss model, although the rate of mass loss must be realistic. The next section lays out the details of the simulations with the starting conditions for the dark matter, the construction of the individual star clusters and where they are inserted into the dark matter distribution. The Monte Carlo scheme to appropriately add two-body relaxation back into the softened star clusters along with high accuracy calibration runs is described in Section 2.2. Section 3 describes the evolution of the cluster masses and how the stars pulled away from the clusters are distributed in streams.
# Globular Clusters in a Cosmological Simulation
The formation processes that lead to the low metallicity halo population of globular clusters of the Milky Way and all other galaxies are not yet well understood. At the high redshifts corresponding to their stellar ages the most common host dark matter halos will have peak circular velocities in roughly the 10-30 range, sufficient to retain gas as reionization occurs, but the gas will largely be driven out as a result energy and momentum input from the more massive stars that they form, leaving a largely dark matter dominated system containing a low metallicity stellar population. Accordingly, it is a reasonable step to focus simulations on the dynamical processes of star clusters in dark matter halos, temporarily setting aside the complications of gas and the stellar structure of the host halos. The star clusters are conceptually placed in the dark halos after their most massive stars have gone through their short and dramatic evolution in the first few hundred million years of the star cluster's evolution, after which stellar evolution produces smaller and slower changes in the mass of stars. The initial conditions then become fairly straightforward, requiring a dark matter distribution at high redshift which evolves into a good approximation of the Milky Way's dark halo. An appropriate subset of the numerous low mass dark halos present at high redshift is then populated with dense star clusters. Subsequent gravitational evolution creates a Milky Way like dark halo containing the remnant star clusters and their tidal tails. Most of the halo clusters orbit at sufficiently large radius that the galactic disk and bulge do not substantially disturb the clusters. The simulations contain a mixture of star particles and dark matter particles. The star particles begin in star clusters that are inserted within the top thirty or so dark matter halos identified in the VL-2 simulation. The resulting mixture of particles is followed using the gravity code Gadget2, augmented to provide the two-body relaxation between stars that drives cluster evolution.
## The Cosmological N-body Halos
The initial conditions for the simulations use the snapshots of the Via Lactea II simulation (VL-2). A set of 20048 halos, with masses above about \(2\times 10^5{\rm\,M_\odot}\), were identified within VL-2 at redshift zero and then traced back in time to give their size, mass, position and velocity. The VL-2 data files for these progenitor sub-halos are the basis of the initial conditions here. Two snapshots, near redshifts 3 and 8, are selected as start times for the insertion of dense star clusters. The lower redshift is within epoch of peak star formation for galaxies and the higher redshift is within the epoch of reionization, which roughly spans the likely range of times over which the old halo clusters are formed. A continuous distribution of globular cluster formation times could be recreated by summing over appropriately weighted starting times, since the star clusters are sufficiently light that they have essentially no effect on the dark matter halos. Only those sub-halos above a minimum sub-halo mass, in the range of a few \(10^9{\rm\,M_\odot}\), are normally populated with star clusters, leaving the rest empty. To create the distribution of particle positions and velocities the individual dark matter halos are approximated as spheres. Each halo is characterized with a maximum circular velocity, \(V_m\), which occurs at radius \(R_m\), together giving a Hernquist mass \(M_H = 4 G^{-1}V_m^2 R_m\). At time 0.70 Gyr, redshift 7.8, halos with \(M_H \ge 0.1\times 10^{10}{\rm\,M_\odot}\) are selected, which identifies 31 halos, and at time 2.08 Gyr, redshift 3.24, \(M_H\ge 0.5\times 10^{10}{\rm\,M_\odot}\) which selects 33 halos. The selected halos at the two times are shown in Figure [\[fig_xy0\]](#fig_xy0){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_xy0"}. The total mass of the 20048 halos in the simulation is \(2.54\times 10^{12}{\rm\,M_\odot}\). The total mass in the halos at early times is 50% and 5% of the final total mass at z=3 and z=8, respectively. To allow for the mass that is not in the Hernquist sphere halos, the additional mass is added as an extended, low density, sphere of particles centered on the 20048 primary halos. This starting setup is sufficiently similar to the VL-2 simulations that its gravitational evolution to the dominant, sub-halo rich, Milky Way-like final halo. The detailed procedure to create the particle distribution first uses the mass distribution with radius to give the particle positions. The analytic distribution function as a function of energy for the Hernquist mass distribution gives the velocity distribution at each radius from which an equilibrium particle distribution for each halo is created. The extra mass required for the total mass is distributed in proportion to the primary halo mass and placed in a second Hernquist sphere given a scale radius 8 times the radius of the central equilibrium distribution, with velocities reduced to 80% of equilibrium in the low density region to ensure that they are accreted onto the central halo over time. The secondary extended halo is low enough density that it does not substantially disrupt the primary halo. The reduced random velocities allow an accretion flow onto the central halo to develop, but is sufficient to suppress a coherent rapid collapse and local gravitational instability. The dark matter distributions of the two simulations are shown 1 Gyr into the simulation in Figure [\[fig_xy50\]](#fig_xy50){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_xy50"}. The z=8 start still has strong cosmic web features, whereas the z=3 start with its dominant halo is in the regime of accretion of satellites.
## Simulating Dense Star Clusters
The internal evolution of star clusters sufficiently dense to survive for a Hubble time remains a vigorous research area. A primary goal of this study is to accurately follow the stars that leave the cluster in the tidal streams. A secondary goal is to study the mass evolution of clusters as a function of their cosmological history. All the internal structural details of the star clusters are not needed, but the clusters need to be sufficiently realistic to lose mass at approximately the correct rate. A simplified physical model of cluster star-star encounters is developed with its parameters calibrated using a high accuracy gravitational n-body model.
### Star Cluster Internal Evolution Model
Star clusters evaporate as a result of gravitational encounters of stars. Following the evolution of a single star cluster in full detail remains a substantial computational challenge. presented a model in which a softened gravity cluster is augmented with a simplified single-zone heating model to approximate the relaxation which drives evaporation. The model calculates velocity from the two-body relaxation time, which is then randomly added to the stars within some fraction of the tidal radius of the model star cluster. The calculation of the required velocity increment is done at intervals of \(\delta t\). The velocity increment for a cluster of characteristic mass \(M_c\) is calculated using the RMS velocity diffusion coefficient, \[\delta v = {\sigma_c \over C_h} \left({\delta t\over 4.9\ {\rm Myr} } \right)^{1/2} \left({M_c\over 10^{5}{\rm\,M_\odot}}\right) ^{1/4} \left({r_v\over 10\ {\rm pc}}\right)^{-5/4}, \label{eq_dvheat}\] where \(\delta v\) is in units of , \(\sigma_c\) is the cluster velocity dispersion, and \(r_v\) is the virial radius, calculated with softening included, then removed in quadrature from the result. The weak explicit dependence on cluster mass, \(M_c\), is useful to retain to ensure that the heating remains reasonable as the clusters near complete evaporation. The cluster mass, \(M_c\) and velocity dispersion are measured within some fiducial radius which is set to be some multiple of the virial radius, usually set at \(6r_v\). The virial radius is preferred over the half mass radius on the basis that it is simpler to calculate and is a stable quantity with a weak dependence on the maximum radius. The clusters here have \(r_v\) values about 2/3 of \(r_h\). The kinematic properties are calculated for each cluster each time the velocity increments need to be added to the star particles. The random velocities are added to all star particles within a radial range of typically 0.5-1.5\(r_v\), with no disturbance of more distance particles. A dummy particle with nearly zero mass is used to mark the center, which speeds up the calculation. At each heating step the dummy's location is updated to the current center of mass and momentum. The \(\delta v\) calculated from Equation [\[eq_dvheat\]](#eq_dvheat){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_dvheat"} is generates a Gaussian distribution of velocity offsets in each velocity direction.
### N-body Cluster Calibration
Nbody6 direct n-body simulations are used to calibrate the model heating parameters. The Nbody6 code is used to generate a Plummer model with 20,000 particles, all of equal mass of 0.7543267 \({\rm\,M_\odot}\). The cluster of particles is placed in a logarithmic potential with a circular velocity of 240at 30 kpc from the center and given an initial tangential velocity of 120. The circular velocity is close to the value of the final dark matter halo of the simulation and the orbit is fairly typical for both real world star clusters that produce streams and many of those that the simulations create. The mass as a function of time of the clusters and their half mass radii are displayed in Figures [\[fig_mtplum\]](#fig_mtplum){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_mtplum"} and [\[fig_rhplum\]](#fig_rhplum){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_rhplum"}, respectively, for the Nbody6 run and precisely the same cluster run with the heated cluster model used here. It is clear that with the right choice of parameters the heated cluster model can reproduce a full n-body result to the required accuracy. An important caveat is that one demonstration holds for one cluster mass on one orbit. Some preliminary tests (Jeremy Webb private communication) have shown a degree of mass dependence of the most suitable heating parameters. The maximum radius inside of which heating is applied to the star particles is fixed at \(1.5r_v\), but the inner heating radius rises from 0.5 to 1.0\(r_v\) for higher mass clusters. The inner radius is described with the interpolating function, \(r_{min}=0.5r_v(5.76\times 10^4{\rm\,M_\odot}/M_c)^{1/3}\) over the mass range \(M_c=5.76\times (10^3-10^4) {\rm\,M_\odot}\), with the value pegged at the upper and bottom limit outside the range. The heating coefficient is similarly varied with cluster mass, \[C_h= 36-9(5.76\times 10^4{\rm\,M_\odot}/M_c)^{1/3}. \label{eq_chm}\] A caution is that the heating coefficients are based on only two Nbody6 runs. An important future step is to extend the cluster mass range, the range of galactic orbits, and the degree to which the reasonable range of stellar mass function, rotation, and binary stars effect the results.
## Cluster Sizes and Halo Orbits
models of star clusters are inserted into the 33 halos more massive than \(0.5\times 10^{10}{\rm\,M_\odot}\) in the z=3 start and the 31 halos more massive than \(0.1\times 10^{10}{\rm\,M_\odot}\) in the z=8 start. Each star cluster starts with 20,000 star particles, with particle masses of 15\({\rm\,M_\odot}\) for clusters of total mass \(3\times 10^5 {\rm\,M_\odot}\). In each halo, three clusters are placed on near circular orbits at \(R_m/2\) and another three \(R_m/4\). The average \(R_m\) is 8.4 kpc for the z=3 start and 2.6 kpc for the z=8 start, so the average cluster is at about 3 kpc at z=3 and 1 kpc at z=8. The clusters are started in a randomly oriented disk distribution, at the local circular velocity with an added random velocity of 5 in each cardinal direction to minimize cluster-cluster interactions. The King model star particle distribution is created with a potential parameter \(W_0 = 7\), the ratio of the central potential depth to the characteristic velocity dispersion of the cluster, resulting in a cluster with a ratio of tidal to core radius of 22.2. A concentration in this range is typical for the \[Fe/H\]\(\le-1\) clusters beyond 10 kpc galactocentric radius. The dark matter softening length is set at 2 kpc. The star particle softening length is set at 2 pc, comparable to the size of a cluster core, which will not be resolved. However, the details of mass loss here are not significantly dependent on accurately following core properties. Reducing the star particle softening to 1 pc sharpens the density profile somewhat, but makes essentially no difference to the mass loss rate for an orbit in the logarithmic potential, at the cost of reduced step sizes. A key consideration for the rate of cluster mass loss is the half-mass radius of the clusters. A King model has \(r_h\) roughly one quarter of the outer radius of the cluster for a wide range of central concentration. If the model cluster of mass \(M_c\) is scaled to the simple tidal radius, \(r_t=r[M(<r)/M_c]^{1/3}\), where \(r\) is the orbital radius and \(M(<r)\) the halo mass within that radius. For the sub-galactic halos the tidal radii work out to around around 100 pc, which leads to \(r_h\) of 25 pc, which is much larger than most current halo clusters. Evolving such large clusters in our n-body model leads to no surviving clusters within 100 kpc of the center of the final Milky Way-like halo. A somewhat artificial approach which avoids assumptions is to scale the King model clusters to \(r_t/10\) after which they naturally expand to their locally preferred size over the first Gyr of the simulation. The internal properties of all 198 clusters in the z=3 run are shown 1 Gyr after the start in Figure [\[fig_GCkin\]](#fig_GCkin){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_GCkin"}. The core has expanded from an unresolved 0.5 pc to about 5 pc. The radial velocity dispersion shows the expected decline with radius then a rise into the unbound particles in the stream. The cluster was started with an isotropic velocity dispersion, \(\beta=0\), but with time \(\beta\) has become a rising positive function, indicating a radially oriented velocity ellipsoid. Figure [\[fig_rhv\]](#fig_rhv){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_rhv"} shows the evolution of the cluster half mass radius and the virial radius within the clusters of the z=3 (top) and z=8 (bottom panel) simulations. The z=8 clusters that fall into the main halo are completely evaporated over the course of the simulation. The catalog gives a half light radius of 8 pc for low metallicity clusters beyond 10 kpc galactocentric radius and 15 pc for those beyond 30 kpc. The half light radius is expected to be somewhat smaller than the half mass radius as a consequence of mass segregation in clusters. The clusters that remain at the end of the simulations here typically have half mass radii of 15-20 pc. Overall the half mass radii in the simulations overlap the range seen in Milky Way halo clusters, but the simulated clusters are missing the very dense clusters with half mass radii of a few parsecs. The gravitational potentials at the location of a representative sixteen clusters in separate halos are shown in Figure [\[fig_pot\]](#fig_pot){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_pot"}. The z=3 simulation shows the pattern expected from accretion with little change in radial period with time. The z=8 simulation shows a growing main halo that disrupts pre-galactic halos as internal orbital motion ceases and as the radial oscillation period increases. The largest eigenvalue of the tidal tensors for the same sixteen clusters is shown in Figure [\[fig_tides\]](#fig_tides){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_tides"}. Tidal forces are dominated by the local density field which emphasizes the variations in the tides due to local orbital motion in the pre-galactic halos, relative the motion in the main halo. The tides are also somewhat noisy due to motion of nearby individual dark matter particles. The individual dark matter particles here have a mass of \(2\times 10^5{\rm\,M_\odot}\) with a softening of 0.2 kpc, so individual particles will have a tidal field of about \(100 (\ifmmode{\,\hbox{km\,s}^{-1}}\else {\rm\,km\,s\)^{-1}\(}\fi/{\rm kpc})^2\) or less, with an encounter time of about 1 Myr, which is not resolved in these plots at intervals of 10 Myr. The clusters are generally in regions where the dark matter particle density is of order \(10^2\) particles per softening length.
## Numerical Considerations
The dark matter particles are much heavier and faster moving than the star particles and will slightly heat the star particles over the course of the simulation. For encounters at impact parameter \(b\) and velocity \(V\), over time \(T\) the heating is the kinetic energy change per encounter, times the rate of encounters and the duration. The heating rate of the cool, light, star particles, per dynamical time, \(t_d=V/R_s\), for a system of size \(R_s\) with \(N\) heavy dark matter particles moving at velocities \(V\), is then, \[{d(\Delta V)^2\over dt} = {6 V^2\over N t_d} \ln{\Lambda}. \label{eq_heat}\] where \(\ln{\Lambda}\) is the Coulomb logarithm, with \(\Lambda=R_s/s\), with \(R_s\) being about 100 kpc here, and \(s\) is the dark matter particle softening. The VL-2 simulation had a force resolution of 0.162 kpc of with particles of mass \(1.8\times 10^5{\rm\,M_\odot}\). The simulation here has very similar particle properties, with dark matter particles of mass \(2\times 10^5{\rm\,M_\odot}\) and a softening set to 0.2 kpc, to preserve the halo structure of the original simulation. The heating of the light, low velocity dispersion, star particles from heavy dark matter particles over a Hubble time needs to be below the velocity dispersion of the clusters, which is comparable to the spread of velocities in the tidal streams. The simulation creates a halo with \(\simeq 10^7\) halo particles with typical orbital velocities of 200, for \(\Lambda= 100/0.2\), \(\ln{\Lambda}\) of 6, the heating over a Hubble time, about 20 dynamical times in the inner regions of interest, is about 2. Lower mass cosmological halos have comparable dynamical times, but fewer particles. Equation [\[eq_heat\]](#eq_heat){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_heat"} indicates that heating varies as \(V^{-1}\) for fixed \(t_d\), so the heating will be about 6in a 20 dark matter halo. The star clusters have characteristic velocity dispersions of 3 and 7, at masses of \(10^5{\rm\,M_\odot}\) and \(10^6{\rm\,M_\odot}\), respectively. The heating is not negligible, but does not significantly compromise the results. The purpose here is to examine the basic effects. Large N simulations will be done later. The star clusters inserted into the simulation have an initial mass of \(3\times 10^5{\rm\,M_\odot}\), which is the mass of cluster at the peak of the current epoch globular cluster mass function. Each cluster in the primary simulations begins with 20,000 particles, each of mass \(15{\rm\,M_\odot}\). The number of particles and the number of clusters inserted, about 200, are selected to give reasonable resolution of the tidal tails and a reasonable balance between dark matter and star particles. Since the entire dark matter distribution needs to be evolved it makes sense to insert clusters in all the most massive pre-galactic sub-halos which comprise at least half of the dark matter mass. Trial runs found that a star particle softening of 0.002 kpc allowed a reasonable time step, the shortest being about \(2\times 10^4\) yr. The star particle softening suppresses relaxation giving the added heating of Equation [\[eq_dvheat\]](#eq_dvheat){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_dvheat"} complete control. Clusters of a fixed initial mass realized with ten times more particles were compared to these cluster both run in a logarithmic external potential, finding essentially no dependence on particle number. The Gadget2 parallelized tree code is very efficient for cosmological simulations. One complication in these simulations is the factor of \(10^4\) scale difference between the 100 kpc scale of the developing Milky Way-like halo and the star clusters with half mass radii in the range of 10 pc. As the star clusters orbit through the dark matter background imbalances in memory and computational load between the processors develop requiring relaxing various Gadget2 load balance parameters. Runs end at 13.4 Gyr, or 13.7 of the calculation's time units which is close to the Hubble age for Via Lactea. There are typically a total of approximately 200,000 time steps in a simulation.
# Cluster and Stream Evolution
The distribution of the dark matter at the end of the simulation is shown in Figure [\[fig_xydend\]](#fig_xydend){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_xydend"} and the stars at the same time are shown in Figure [\[fig_xysend\]](#fig_xysend){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_xysend"} for the two runs. The main dark matter halos in the two runs are comparable, with masses of \(9.3\times 10^{11}{\rm\,M_\odot}\) and \(7.5\times 10^{11}{\rm\,M_\odot}\), for the z=3 and z=8 start simulations, respectively. The z=3 start simulation has a more spherical halo. Not visible in the frame is that both runs have a second large halo about half the mass of the dominant one, located at a distance of 780 kpc for the z=8 start and 360 kpc for the z=3 start. The two runs lead to very different cluster mass loss from the star clusters and spatial distribution of the tidal streams. The clusters in the z=3 run, top panel of Figure [\[fig_xysend\]](#fig_xysend){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_xysend"}, have only a small in a diffuse distribution and most of the star clusters remain intact. On the other hand, the clusters in the z=8 run, bottom panel of Figure [\[fig_xysend\]](#fig_xysend){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_xysend"}, have a substantial diffuse component and the clusters accreted on the main halo are completely dissolved.
## Tidal Streams and Remnant Clusters
The fractional mass remaining in the clusters as a function of time is shown in Figure [\[fig_mt\]](#fig_mt){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_mt"} for a random 10% subset of the clusters in the two simulations. Both simulations show a large range in cluster mass loss rates with time, reflecting the wide range of cluster tidal environments. The z=8 start clusters are much more likely to be entirely disrupted before the simulation reaches an age of half a Hubble time, about 7 Gyr. In the z=8 start simulation, larger halos build up as smaller halos encounter each other on nearly radial orbits, so that their stellar contents pass through regions of strong tidal fields. The z=3 start simulation has a large dominant halo into which significantly smaller halos fall from relatively large distances and either miss or quickly pass through high tidal field regions, causing far less star cluster disruption. The radial distribution of dark matter (black lines) and stars stripped from the globular clusters (blue lines) is shown in Figure [\[fig_dens\]](#fig_dens){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_dens"} for the z=3 start (top panel) and z=8 start (bottom panel). The star clusters are in relatively denser regions in the z=8 start than in the z=3 start, therefore relative to the approximately the same overall dark matter distribution of the Milky Way-like final halo the stars removed from the z=8 stars remain more bound and are a more centrally concentrated population than the z=3 remnants. The cluster stars are projected onto the sky in Figure [\[fig_ah\]](#fig_ah){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_ah"} using an equal area Hammer-Aitoff projection. The center is defined as the center of mass of the clusters inserted into the main halo. All stars to 50 kpc are plotted with equal weights, with more distant ones reduced with the inverse square of the distance to allow a somewhat realistic decline in visibility. As expected from the xy plots the z=3 start produces somewhat longer thin streams than the z=8 start. Table [1](#tbl-1){reference-type="ref" reference="tbl-1"} provides an overview of the basic statistics of the tidal streams in the two simulations. Streams are identified using the current observational technique, which is to identify relatively straight thin structures by eye. The minimum angular length that qualifies is approximately 10 degrees. These images have comparable numbers of visible particles (a few thousand typically) as real streams have stars. The simulation has the advantage that there are effectively no field stars or dust that complicates finding Milky Way streams. A few interesting conclusions can be taken from these two stream formation simulations, but a full analysis of stream properties is deferred to a future paper. In the z=3 simulation the infall clusters remain largely intact, with an average of 55% of their initial mass retained. In complete contrast, the z=8 start has no remaining clusters in the inner regions with more than 0.1% of their initial mass. The complete dissolution of the z=8 clusters may be at least partly due to fluctuations in the tides and will need to be tested in larger N runs. The table shows that every z=3 start cluster inside 50 kpc has a visible stream produces a visible stream, and 67% of the clusters inside 100 kpc has a visible stream. The z=8 start leads to a more compact distribution, with 78 cluster centers (no remnant clusters) inside 50 kpc, but only 23 streams visible. Comparing the top and bottom panels of Fig [\[fig_ah\]](#fig_ah){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_ah"} shows that the z=8 start streams are generally shorter than the z=3 start ones, likely a result of the z=3 infall being earlier and relatively smooth as indicated in the potentials of Fig [\[fig_pot\]](#fig_pot){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_pot"}. These two simulations effectively bracket the redshift range over which globular clusters accreted onto our halo are formed. Because not all globular clusters have visible streams the z=3 start is not a good explanation for all of the halo stream population, and, because no z=8 clusters survive in the main halo it also fails to explain the full population, but the combination of the two, and intermediate times, would be a qualitatively acceptable mix. The list of finds that only 2 of the 12 streams have "known or likely globular cluster progenitors\", Pal 5 and NGC 5466. Based on the result here that every accreted z=3 cluster should still be present with its stream, one infers that 10/12 of the streams have their origin in globular clusters formed at redshifts greater than 3. Similarly the two streams with remnant clusters are likely to have formed around z=3 and been accreted onto a dominant Milky Way-like halo fairly quickly. These results depend on the density of the region in which the clusters formed in their pre-galactic halos. Clusters here were inserted at radii of the 1/4 to 1/2 of the peak of the circular velocity. If the clusters were inserted yet more deeply into the pre-galactic halos they would be in stronger tidal fields which would boost the rate of dissolution upwards to that experienced in higher redshift start simulations. The fact that only 2 of the 12 thin streams have progenitor clusters. combined with the weak mass dependence of the rate of the evolution of the cluster mass function seen here suggests that most globular clusters that were accreted onto the halo have dissolved. Poisson statistics for 2 expected events indicates that up to 4 events contains 95% of the probability, or, 2/3 of the cluster population that makes streams is dissolved. With the small sample and large extrapolation in mind, these numbers indicate that at high redshift that with fairly high confidence there should be about 3 times more globular clusters that formed than currently observed. More recent stream discoveries find more streams and no more clearly associated globular clusters.
:::
Although a dynamical analysis of streams is left to a future paper, streams are often modeled with their dynamical variables, such as angular momentum and energy. Figure [\[fig_lt\]](#fig_lt){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_lt"} shows the length of the angular momentum vector of individual star particles from a set of clusters that produce thin streams in the two simulations. The horizontal variable is the same as in the Hammer-Aitoff plots of Figure [\[fig_ah\]](#fig_ah){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_ah"}, which wraps around the sky. The angular momentum is calculated with respect to the center of rotation of the inner-most star clusters. The halos here are triaxial, so the angular momentum will not be a conserved quantity, but it remains sufficiently close to being conserved that it is useful guide. Thin tidal streams emanating from star clusters that are orbiting freely in the main halo are the thin, approximately linear, features in Figure [\[fig_lt\]](#fig_lt){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_lt"}. Stripped stars that are orbiting within a sub-galactic halo create a vertical feature. A dark matter halo that passes through a stream pulls stream stars towards the centerline of its path, leading to a sideways "S'-like feature in the angular momentum of the stream, which with time develops into a gap in the stream density. Both "S" and gap features appear to be present in Figure [\[fig_lt\]](#fig_lt){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_lt"}.
## Star Cluster Mass Function Evolution
The evolution of the mass function of the globular cluster population is of great interest for comparison to current day globular cluster systems, and, for estimating the numbers of clusters that were present at high redshifts, within a few Gyr of formation. To provide an initial estimate of the mass function evolution we populate the same dark matter simulations with stellar clusters drawn from a \(n(M)\propto M^{-1.5}\) mass distribution function, limited to \(0.05-2\times 10^6 {\rm\,M_\odot}\). At total of 1433 clusters were inserted, distributed over all halos in proportion to the halo mass. The ratio of stellar mass to dark matter mass is \(3\times 10^{-5}\) in the final main halo. The mass functions are shown with time in Figure [\[fig_nm\]](#fig_nm){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_nm"}. The mean number over the inserted mass range declines to about 50% of the initial population to a time of 13.4 Gyr. On the other hand, the z=8 population is reduced by half at z=1 and disappears by redshift zero, again with the caveat that this strong evolution needs further numerical verification. An interesting outcome is that the mass loss from the clusters has a relatively weak rise towards lower masses. The significantly more rapid destruction of clusters in the z=8 start as compared to the z=3 start can be attributed to the significantly stronger tidal forces that the clusters in the high redshift start experience. Although the z=3 start clusters have a lower rate of mass loss, they also show little mass dependence, suggestive that tidal heating continues to overwhelm the internal two-body heating. An important caveat is that these results depend on both the internal heating model used, and, the fluctuations in the tidal field that the current particle numbers allow. The sky distribution of the variable mass clusters is shown in Figure [\[fig_ahnm\]](#fig_ahnm){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_ahnm"}. Here the maximum distance for full weight visibility is 35 kpc, to be comparable to the maps. It is important to note that the most massive clusters make the most visible streams, because their lose stars at a higher absolute rate. find 15 streams in \(3\pi\) of sky to a depth of 35 kpc, although about another half dozen streams are known from other data. The plane of the Milky Way reduces the effective sky area for stream finding significantly. If it is reduced to \(2\pi\), or half the total sky, then the 28 streams in the simulation,Table [1](#tbl-1){reference-type="ref" reference="tbl-1"}, is in reasonable agreement with the streams in the sky, although all of these have remnant clusters in them, which the real sky does not. Globular clusters are a site for the creation of some fraction of the relatively heavy binary black holes that LIGO has detected through the gravitational hardening and exchanges of binaries in the cores of globular clusters [@PZM:00; @Oleary:16; @Mapelli:16; @Hurley:16; @Rodriguez:15; @Rodriguez:16; @Askar:17; @Park:17]. The binary black holes that are merging today formed at much earlier times. The simulations here indicate that the clusters above \(10^5{\rm\,M_\odot}\) that have survived are 1/2 or less of the high redshift globular cluster population when the BBHs were produced. The prediction of the cluster binary LIGO event rate is therefore at least twice times the event rate that is predicted based on the numbers of globular clusters, with the statistics indicating that in the mean a full factor of five more could have been present. More recent stream discoveries pushes the number of streams up another 5-6 streams, with one somewhat marginal case for a progenitor globular cluster. At present, these numbers rest on 12-18 streams, 2-3 globular clusters, and two simulations. Both additional simulations and a more quantitative comparison to sky data are needed to harden these conclusions.
# Discussion and Conclusions
Stellar dynamical, globular cluster-like, star clusters are placed in a in a full cosmological simulation at approximately redshifts 3 and 8. The simulations give a cosmologically realistic view of how the thin, and not-so thin, stellar streams from globular clusters are formed and the overall spatial distribution of the stars evaporated and tidally pulled from globular clusters. The simulations are gravity-only, with no hydrodynamics or star formation mechanism. The Gadget2 code is augmented to introduce an appropriate level of two-body driven heating into the star clusters, with heating parameters calibrated with Nbody6 runs of a few clusters. The current calibration runs are limited to low mass clusters and one or two orbits. The modified Gadget2 code is able to reproduce the calibration runs to within about 10% in mass loss and cluster size. These initial runs typically have \(10^7\) dark matter particles and a comparable but generally somewhat smaller number of star particles. The particle numbers are sufficient, but just barely, to keep heating of star particles from dark matter particles below the very low velocity dispersion present in the streams. The resulting star clusters at the end of the simulation have half mass radii in the range of those seen in the halo, 15-20 pc, but tend to be somewhat larger. These and other numerical issues will be examined further with additional simulations. The basic stream morphologies are comparable to observed streams, with the simulations giving thin streams lengths ranging from around 10 degrees up to about 100 degrees on the sky. Essentially all streams have an extended diffuse component that is several kpc wide that is composed of stars tidally removed from the clusters while they were in their pre-galactic halos which upon accretion into the growing Milky Way halo are spread out over the width of their orbit in the dwarf. The longer thin streams generally exhibit density variations along their length, qualitatively as expected on the basis of dark matter sub-halos crossing the streams and creating gaps. The survival rate of the z=3 start clusters with streams is 100% inside 50kpc, whereas the z=8 start has no surviving clusters in the inner halo. The observed streams have 2 or 3 visible progenitor clusters in 12-18 streams. Although the statistics have large uncertainties a tentative conclusion is that for every massive current epoch globular cluster there were at least two, and possibly more, at high redshift. The mass loss is, appropriately, sensitive to the details of the heating model for the star clusters. The model has been validated for only a few orbits with low mass clusters. In particular the significant tidally driven evolution of the massive clusters can be understood as tidally driven, but will be examined further in future n-body simulations. Comments from an anonymous referee spurred substantial revisions to this paper. This research was supported by NSERC of Canada. | {'timestamp': '2018-05-01T02:01:41', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01938', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01938'} |
# Introduction
Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and Bayesian Statistics are two independent disciplines, the former being a method to sample from a distribution while the latter is a theory to interpret observed data. When these two disciplines are combined together, the effect is so dramatic and powerful that it has revolutionized data analysis in almost all disciplines of science, and astronomy is no exception. This review explores the power of this combination. What is so special about MCMC based Bayesian data analysis? The usefulness of Bayesian methods in science and astronomy is easy to understand. In many situations, it is easy to predict the outcome given a cause. But in science, most often, we are faced with the opposite question. Given the outcome of an experiment what are the causes, or what is the probability of a cause as compared to some other cause? If we have some prior information, how does that help us? This opposite problem is more difficult to solve. The power of Bayesian theory lies in the fact that it provides a unified framework to quantitatively answer such questions. Hence it has become indispensable for science. As opposed to deductive logic, Bayesian theory provides a framework for plausible reasoning, a concept which is more powerful and general, an idea championed by in his book. The question now is how does one solve a problem that has been set up using Bayesian theory. This mostly involves computing the probability distribution function (pdf) of some parameters given the data and is written as \(p(\theta|D)\). Here, \(\theta\) need not be a single parameter; in general, it represents a set of parameters. Usually here and elsewhere, such functions do not have analytical solutions and so we need methods to numerically evaluate the distribution. This is where MCMC methods come to the rescue. They provide an efficient and easy way to sample points from any given distribution which is analogous to evaluating the distribution. Bayesian data analysis and Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques have existed for more than 50 years. Their tremendous increase in popularity over the last decade is due to an increase in computational power which has made it affordable to do such computations. The simplest and the most widely used MCMC algorithm is the "random walk" Metropolis algorithm (). However, the efficiency of this algorithm depends upon the "proposal distribution" which the user has to supply. This means that there is some problem-specific fine tuning to be done by the user. The problem to find a suitable proposal distribution becomes worse as the dimensionality of the space over which the sampling is done increases. Correlations and degeneracies between the coordinates further exacerbate the problem. Many algorithms have been proposed to solve this problem and it remains an active area of research. Some algorithms work better for specific problems and under special conditions but algorithms that work well in general are in high demand. Multimodal distributions pose additional problems for MCMC algorithms. In such situations, an MCMC chain can easily get stuck at a local density maximum. To overcome this, algorithms like simulated tempering and parallel tempering have been proposed (). Hence discussion of efficient MCMC algorithms is one focus of this review. Given its general applicability, the Bayesian framework can be used in almost any field of astronomy. Hence, it is not possible to discuss all its applications. However, there are many examples where either alternatives do not exist or are inferior. The aim of this review is to specifically discuss such cases where Bayesian-MCMC methods have enjoyed great success. The Bayesian framework by itself is very simple. The difficult part when attempting to solve a problem is to express the problem within this framework and then to choose the appropriate MCMC method to solve it. The best way to master this is by studying a diverse set of applications, and we aim to provide this in our review (). Finally, we also discuss a few advanced topics like non-parametric models and hierarchical Bayesian models () which are not yet main stream in astronomy but are very powerful and allow one to solve complex problems. To summarize, the review has three main aims. The first is to explain the basics of Bayesian theory using simple familiar problems, e.g., fitting a straight line to a set of data points with errors in both coordinates and in the presence of outliers. This is targeted at readers who are new to the topic. The second goal is to provide a concise overview of recent developments. This will benefit people who are familiar with Bayesian data analysis but are interested in learning more. The final aim is to discuss emerging ideas that hold great promise in future. We also develop and distribute downloadable software (available at or by running the command `pip install bmcmc`) implementing some of the algorithms and examples that we discuss.
## Rise of MCMC based Bayesian methods in astronomy and science
The emergence of Bayesian statistics has a long and interesting history dating back to 1763 when Thomas Bayes laid down the basic ideas of his new probability theory [@mr1763essay published posthumously by Richard Price]. It was rediscovered independently by Laplace and used in a wide variety of contexts, e.g., celestial mechanics, population statistics, reliability, and jurisprudence. However, after that it was largely ignored. A few scientists like, Bruno de Finetti and Harold Jeffreys kept the Bayesian theory alive in the first half of the 20th century. Harold Jeffreys published the book Theory of Probability, which for a long time remained the main reference for using the Bayes theorem. The Bayes theorem was used in the Second World War at Bletchley Park, United Kingdom, for cracking the German Enigma code, but its use remained classified for many years afterwards. From 1950 onwards, the tide turned towards Bayesian methods. However, the lack of proper tools to do Bayesian inference remained a challenge. The frequentist methods in comparison were simpler to implement which made them more popular. Recent statement by the American Statistical Association, warning on the misuse of P values is another example of the superiority of the Bayesian methods of hypothesis testing. Interestingly, efficient methods like MCMC to sample distributions had been invented by 1954 in the context of solving problems in statistical mechanics . (The brand name Monte Carlo was coined by where they discussed a stochastic method making use of random numbers to solve a class of problems in mathematical physics which are difficult to solve due to the large number of dimensions.) Such problems typically involve \(N\) interacting particles. A single configuration \(\omega\) of such a system is fully specified by giving the position and velocity of all the particles; i.e., \(\omega\) can be defined by a point in \(\mathcal{R}^{2N}\) space, also known as the configuration space \(\Omega\). The total energy is a function of the configuration \(E(\omega)\). For a system in equilibrium, the probability of a configuration is given by \(\exp(-E(\omega)/kT)\), where \(k\) is the Boltzmann constant and \(T\) is the temperature of the system. Computing any thermodynamic property of the system, e.g., pressure or energy typically involves computing integrals of the form \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] \|F= for which \(Z=\int \exp(-E(\omega)/kT) d \omega\) is known as the partition function. The integrals over \(\omega\) are in most cases analytically and computationally intractable. The idea of Metropolis and colleagues was to start with an arbitrary configuration of \(N\) particles and then move each particle by a random walk. If \(\Delta E<0\), the move is always accepted, otherwise, it is accepted stochastically with probability \(\exp(-\Delta E/kT)\), which is the ratio of the probability of the new configuration with respect to the old. The method ends up choosing a configuration \(\omega\) sampled from \(\exp(-E(\omega)/kT)\). The method immediately became popular in the statistical physics community. However, the fact that the same method can be used for sampling an arbitrary pdf \(p(\omega)\) by simply replacing \(E(\omega)/kT\) with \(\ln(p(\omega))\) had to wait till the important paper by. He generalized the work of Metropolis and colleagues and derived the essential condition for the acceptance ratio that a Markov chain ought to satisfy in order to sample the target distribution. The generalized algorithm is now known as the Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithm. Later Hastings's student Peskun showed that, among the available choices, the one by Metropolis and colleagues was the most efficient. Despite its introduction to the statistical community, the ideas remained dormant till 1980. Around 1980 things suddenly changed and a few influential algorithms appeared. Simulated annealing was presented by to solve combinatorial optimization problems using the MH algorithm in conjunction with ideas of annealing from solid state physics. It is especially useful for situations where we have multiple maxima and applies to any setting where we have to minimize an objective function \(C(\omega)\). This is done by sampling \(\exp(-C(\omega)/T)\), with progressively decreasing \(T\) to allow annealing and selection of a globally optimum solution. A year later introduced what we currently know as "Gibbs sampling" in the context of image restoration. This was the first proper use of MCMC techniques to solve a problem set up in a Bayesian framework, in the sense that simulating from conditional distributions is the same as simulating from the joint distribution. However, there exists earlier work related to Gibbs sampling; the Hammersley-Clifford theorem which was developed in the early 1970s and the work by. At about this time, one of the most influential methods of the 20th-century emerged \(-\) the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm by. This provided a way to deal with missing data and hidden variables and vastly increased the range of problems that can be addressed by Bayesian methods. The EM algorithm is deterministic and has some sensitivity to the starting configuration. To address this, stochastic versions were developed quickly followed by the data augmentation (DA) algorithm. The watershed moment in the field of statistics is largely credited to the paper by that unified the ideas of Gibbs sampling, DA and the EM algorithm. It firmly established that Gibbs sampling and Metropolis-Hastings based MCMC algorithms can be used to solve a wide class of problems that fall into the category of hierarchical Bayesian models. The citation history of the famous paper shown in corroborates the historical narrations on this topic. In physics, the MH algorithm was well known in the period 1970-1990, but this was not so in statistics or astronomy. In astronomy, a watershed moment can be seen in 2002; this is visible more clearly in where we track the usage of the words *MCMC* and *Bayesian*. But prior to 2002, the Bayesian-MCMC technique was not unknown to the astronomy community. We can see its use in who applied it to extract galaxy kinematics from absorption line spectra. Further seeds were planted down the line by while studying gravitational wave radiation, and then by and in the context of cosmological parameter estimation using cosmic microwave background data. Inspired by these papers, more than any other paper seems to have galvanized the astronomy community in the use of Bayesian and MCMC techniques. They laid out in detail the Bayesian-MCMC framework, applied it to one of the most important data sets of the time (cosmic background radiation) and used it to address a significant scientific question \(-\) the fundamental parameters of our universe. Additionally, they made their MCMC code publicly available, which was instrumental in lowering the barrier for new entrants to the field.
# Bayesian Data Analysis
In this section we briefly review the basics of the Bayesian theory. We start with the Bayes theorem and then use it to set up the problem of fitting a model to data. This is followed by a discussion of the role of priors in Bayesian analysis. Next, the Bayesian solution of fitting a straight line is discussed in detail to illustrate the ideas discussed. Finally, we show how to perform model selection. To further explore the topics discussed here, many excellent resources are available. A stimulating discussion on Bayesian theory can be found in. and are excellent textbooks with a good emphasis on applications in science. provides lucid tutorial on fitting models to data. A fascinating discussion on Bayesian versus frequentist approaches to solving problems can be found in. A review with emphasis on cosmology is given by .
## Bayes' Theorem
showed that the rules of Bayesian probability theory can be derived from just two basic rules: \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] & p(H\|I)+p(\|H\|I) = 1 & [Sum Rule]{.roman},\
& p(H,D\|I) = p(H\|D,I)p(D\|I)=p(D\|H,I)p(H\|I) & [Product Rule]{.roman}. Here \(H\) stands for some proposition being true and \(D\) stands for some other proposition being true, and \(\bar{H}\) means the proposition \(H\) is false. So the sum rule just states that the probability of a proposition being true plus the probability of it being false is unity. The product rule expresses the joint probability of two propositions being true in terms of conditional probabilities, one being true given the other is true. The vertical bar \(|\) is a conditioning symbol and means 'given'. \(I\) denotes relevant background information that is used to construct the probabilities. The product rule leads to the Bayes Theorem \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(H\|D,I)=,, where we identify \(H\) with the hypothesis and \(D\) with the data. The \(p(D|H,I)\) is the probability of observing the data \(D\) if the hypothesis is true and is known as the *likelihood*. The quantity \(p(H|I)\) is the *prior* and specifies our prior knowledge of \(H\) being true. The \(p(H|D,I)\), known as *posterior*, expresses our updated belief about the truth of the hypothesis in light of the data \(D\). The quantity \(p(D|I)\) is a constant and serves the purpose of normalizing \(\int p(H|D,I)\:{\rm d}H\) to 1. It is known as the *evidence*. Another important result that can be derived from the sum rule and the product rule is the marginalization equation, \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(X\|I)=p(X,Y\|I)dY=\_i p(X,Y_i\|I). First let us write the sum rule in an alternate form. Instead of considering just \(Y\) and \(\bar{Y}\), we consider a set of possibilities \(\{Y_i\}\) that are mutually exclusive. \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(Y_i\|I)=1, & [Extended Sum Rule]{.roman}. Now, making use of the product rule and the sum rule we get \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] \_i p(X,Y_i\|I) &= \_i p(Y_i\|X,I)p(X\|I) & [using product rule]{.roman}\
&= p(X\|I) \_i p(Y_i\|X,I) = p(X\|I) & [using sum rule]{.roman}.
## Fitting a model to data
Typically, we have some data and we want to use it for scientific inference. One of the most effective approaches to dealing with such problems is to develop a model that describes how the data were created. Let \(\theta\) be the set of parameters of the model and \(x^t\) a data point generated by the model according to \(f(x^t|\theta)\). The observed data points \(x\) can have some measurement errors, described by a parameter \(\sigma_x\). The probability of the observed value is then given by \(p(x|x^t,\sigma_x)\), which could be \(\mathcal{N}(x|x^t,\sigma_x^2)\) for Gaussian errors; hereafter, \(\mathcal{N}(.|\mu,\sigma^2)\) refers to a normal distribution with mean \(\mu\) and variance \(\sigma^2\). The probability of observed data point \(x\) given a model and an error is then \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(x\|,\_x)=f(x\^t\|)p(x\|x\^t,\_x) dx\^t. We have integrated over true values \(x^t\) which are unknown. If we have reason to believe that there are outliers in the data, e.g., a fraction of points are not described by the model, we can supplement a background model \(f_b(x^t|\theta_b)\) with probability \(P_b\) and parameters \(\theta_b\). The probability of the observed data points can then be written as, \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(x\|,\_b,P_b,\_x) & = & p(x\|x\^t,\_x) dx\^t\
& = & p(x\|\_b)P_b +p(x\|)(1-P_b). The total probability for a set of \(N\) data points \(X=\{x_1...,x_N\}\) is then \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(X\|,\_b,P_b,\_x) & = & \_i=1\^N p(x_i\|,\_b,P_b,\_x,i). To infer the model parameters, one uses the Bayes theorem and computes \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(,\_b,P_b\|X,\_x) & & p(X\|,\_b,P_b,\_x)p(,\_b,P_b). Here, \(p(\theta,\theta_b,P_b)\) represents our prior knowledge about the parameters. We discuss this in detail in the next section. We consider the problem of fitting a straight line with equation \(y=mx+c\) to some data points \(X=\{x_1...,N\}\) and \(Y=\{y_1...,N\}\), with uncertainty \(\sigma_{y,i}\) on the \(y\) ordinate. We generated 50 data points with \(m=2.0\) and \(c=10.0\); 20% of the data points were set as outliers and were sampled from \(\mathcal{N}(30,5^2)\). To simulate random uncertainty the \(y\) ordinate was scattered with a Gaussian function having dispersion in range \(0.25<\sigma_y<1.25\). The data along with the results of our fitting exercise are shown in . The image shows the outliers and data sampled from a straight line. We first fitted a simple model without taking the outliers into account (dashed line). Here, \(\theta=\{m, b\}\) and the generative model of the data is \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(y_i\|m,c,x_i,\_y,i)=(-) It can be seen that the "best fit" line is not a good description for the data points that were sampled from a straight line. Next, we extended the model by adding a model for the outliers as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(y_i\|\_b,\_b,x_i,\_y,i)= (-) The full model being \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(Y\|m,c,P_b,\_b,\_b,X,\_y)=\_i=1\^N \[p(y_i\|\_b,\_b,x_i,\_y,i)P_b+p(y_i\|m,c,x_i,\_y,i)(1-P_b)\] [\[equ:outliers\]]{#equ:outliers label="equ:outliers"} The best-fit line resulting from this model obtained by sampling the posterior distribution using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo scheme is shown in . The best-fit parameters of the model resemble well the true parameters that were used to create the synthetic data set (the example is implemented in the software that we provide).
## Priors
Priors are one of the most important ingredients of the Bayesian framework. Priors express our present state of knowledge about the parameters of interest, which we wish to constrain by analyzing new data. In a multi-dimensional parameter space, it is quite common to have degeneracies among the parameters. Here priors can play a crucial rule in restricting the posterior to a small region of the parameter space as compared to the much larger region allowed by the likelihood function. Priors can be broadly classified into two types, uninformative and informative. Uninformative priors express our state of ignorance and have very little restricting power. They are also known as ignorance prior. Typically their distributions are diffuse. Informative priors on the other hand By contrast, informative priors are typically very restricting. They might come from the analysis of some previous data. They are important when the data alone are not very informative and without external information the data cannot adequately constrain the parameters being investigated. Ignorance priors are used in cases where we have very little knowledge about the parameters we want to constrain, and we wish to express our ignorance by using uninformative priors. Certainly a prior with sudden jumps or oscillating features is too detailed for expressing ignorance! So smoothness is certainly an important criterion for an ideal uninformative prior. In fact, if the data are informative, almost any prior that is sufficiently smooth in the region of high likelihood will lead to very similar conclusions. Is there a formal and unique way to express our ignorance? A number of techniques exist for constructing ignorance priors. We here discuss a few simple and commonly used ones; for a detailed review see. The simplest is Laplace's principle of insufficient reason which assigns equal probability to all possible values of the parameter. If the parameter space consists of a finite set of points, then it is easy to apply this principle. However, for a continuous parameter space, the prior depends upon the chosen partitioning scheme. Ignorance priors can also be specified using the invariance of the likelihood function, \(p(x'|\theta'){\rm d}x'=p(x|\theta){\rm d}x\), under the action of a transformation group \((x',\theta')=h(x,\theta)\), e.g., translation, scaling or rotation of coordinates. If the priors are really uninformative, consistency demands that we should make the same Bayesian inference, which implies that the priors should also be invariant to the transformation and satisfy \(p(\theta'){\rm d}\theta'=p(\theta){\rm d}\theta\) . For two special types of parameters, this leads to unique choices for expressing ignorance. These are the *location parameters* and the *scale parameters*. An example is the mean \(\mu\) and dispersion \(\sigma\) of a normal distribution \(\mathcal{N}(x|\mu,\sigma^2)\) which are the location and the scale parameters respectively. The likelihood \(\mathcal{N}(x|\mu,\sigma^2)\) is invariant under transformation \((x',\mu')=(x+b,\mu+b)\), demanding invariance for the prior leads to \(p(\mu)={\rm constant}\). Similarly, \(\mathcal{N}(x|\mu,\sigma^2)\) is also invariant under \((x'-\mu',\sigma')=(a(x-\mu),a\sigma)\), which leads to \(p(\sigma) \propto 1/\sigma\). In general, \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\) are location and scale parameters if likelihood is of the form \(f((x-\mu)/\sigma)/\sigma\). Another commonly used technique to specify ignorance priors is the Jeffreys rule, \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p() (())\^1/2 \[()\]\_ij=p(x\|) p(x\|) dx is the Fisher information matrix and \(\theta\) a vector of parameters. It is based on the idea that the prior should be invariant to reparameterization of \(\theta\). Applying it to the case where the likelihood is a normal distribution \(\mathcal{N}(x|\mu,\sigma^2)\), gives \(p(\mu)= {\rm constant}\) (for a fixed \(\sigma\)) and \(p(\sigma)= 1/\sigma\) (for a fixed \(\mu\)). However, when applied to both \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\) together, it gives \(p(\mu,\sigma)=1/\sigma^2\). To avoid this contradiction the rule was modified to \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\_1..\_k,) (())\^1/2, where \(\mu_i\) are location parameters and \(\mathcal{I}(\theta)\) is calculated keeping them fixed. The principle of maximum entropy is also helpful for selecting priors. Suppose we are interested in knowing the pdf of a variable, e.g., the probability of a given face of a six-faced die landing up. Suppose we also have some macroscopic constraint available to us, e.g., the mean value obtained when the die is rolled a large number of times. Such a constraint cannot uniquely identify a pdf but can be used to rule out a number of pdfs. The principle says that out of all possible pdfs satisfying the constraint, the most likely one is the one having maximum entropy, where the entropy is defined as \(S=-\sum p_i\log p_i\). We now use this principle to derive the most likely distribution of a variable for two common cases.
- If for a variable \(x\) we know the expectation value \(\bar{x}\) and the fact that it lies in the range \([0,\infty]\) then the maximum entropy distribution of \(x\) is \(p(x|\bar{x}) = \exp(-x/\bar{x})/\bar{x}.\)
- If \(\bar{x}\) and variance \(\sigma^2=\langle (x-\bar{x})^2\rangle\) are known, then \(p(x|\bar{x},\sigma)=\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}\exp\left(-\frac{(x-\bar{x})^2}{2 \sigma^2}\right).\)
## Fitting a straight line
We now consider the Bayesian solution for fitting a straight line in detail. We first discuss the solution for the general case where we have uncertainties on both \(x\) and \(y\) coordinates and then discuss the case where the uncertainties are unknown. Suppose we have a collection of points \((X=\{x_1...,x_N\}\), \(Y=\{y_1...,x_N\})\), with uncertainties \(\mathbf{\Sigma}=\{\mathbf{\Sigma}_1...,\mathbf{\Sigma}_N\}\). Here \(\mathbf{\Sigma}_i\) is the covariance matrix defined as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] \_i= . We want to fit a line \(y=ax+b\) to these data. For the time being, we assume \(\mathbf{\Sigma}_i\) to be a diagonal matrix with \(\sigma_{xy,i}=0\). Let \((x,y)\) be the true values corresponding to the point \((x_i,y_i)\). Then the probability of measuring the point \((x,y)\) at \((x_i,y_i)\) is \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(x,y\|x_i,y_i,\_x,i,\_y,i) & = & (\--). Let us consider a generative model for the line. We consider the pdf of a line to be described by a Gaussian with width \(\sigma_p\) along a direction perpendicular to the line and width \(\sigma_h\) along the line. Here, \(\sigma_p\) can be thought of as an intrinsic scatter about the linear relation that we wish to investigate. In the limit \(\sigma_h \to \infty\), the probability of a point \((x,y)\) to be sampled from this generative model is \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(x,y\|a,b,\_p) & = & (-). Hence, the probability of \((x_i,y_i)\) being sampled from the generative model of the line is \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(x_i,y_i\|a,b,\_x,i,\_y,i,\_p) && = p(x,y\|a,b,\_p) p(x,y\|x_i,y_i,\_x,i,\_y,i) dxdy\
&& = (-) where \(\sigma_{\perp,i}=\sqrt{(\sigma_{y,i}^2+a^2\sigma_{x,i}^2)/(1+a^2)}\) is the component of the error vector perpendicular to the line, and \(d_i=(y_i-a x_i-b)/\sqrt{1+a^2}\) is the perpendicular distance of the point from the line. For a general matrix \(\mathbf{\Sigma}_i\), \(\sigma_{\perp,i}=\hat{\mathbf{u}}^T\mathbf{\Sigma}_i \hat{\mathbf{u}}\) for which \(\hat{\mathbf{u}}=(-a/\sqrt{1+a^2},1/\sqrt{1+a^2})\) is a unit vector perpendicular to the line. For the full sample, \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(X,Y\|,a,b,\_p) & = & \_i\^N (-). If we desire to compute \(a\) and \(b\), then \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(a,b\|X,Y,) & = & A p(a,b) p(X,Y\|,a,b). Henceforth, \(A\) is a normalization constant which may be different in different equations. The \(p(a,b)\) is the prior distribution of parameters of the line. The two common choices for the prior are the uniform (flat) and Jeffreys prior. Neither is appropriate. Given the rotational symmetry in the problem, a sensible choice is to have priors that are symmetric with respect to rotation. Let \(\theta=\tan^{-1}a\) be the angle made by the line with \(x\) axis, and \(b_{\perp}=b\cos(\theta)\) be the distance of the line from the origin. A uniform prior on \(\theta\) and \(b_{\perp}\) is symmetric with respect to rotation. This leads to \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(a,b)a d b== In , we graphically show how a prior uniform in \(a\) differs from a prior uniform in \(\theta=\tan^{-1}(a)\). In the left panel, we show straight lines uniformly spaced in \(a\). The lines tend to crowd at high value of \(a\), and this can bias the estimate of the slope \(a\). In the right panel, the lines are uniformly spaced in \(\theta\), and there is no crowding effect. The log-likelihood of the full solution after taking the prior into account is \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] L & =& p(a,b\|{x_i},{y_i},\_i,\_p)\
& = & K-(1+a\^2)-\_i=1\^N(\_,i\^2+\_p\^2)-\_i=1\^N. We now study the case where \(\mathbf{\Sigma_i}\) is unknown and \(\sigma_p=0\). For simplicity, we assume the uncertainty is the same for all data points, i.e., \(\sigma_{\perp,i}=\sigma_{\perp}\). \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(a,b,\_\|{x_i},{y_i}) & = & p(a,b,\_) p({x_i},{y_i}\|\_,a,b)\
& = & p(a,b)p(\_\|a,b) (-) and integrate over \(\sigma_\perp\) using Jeffreys prior \(p(\sigma_\perp|a,b)=1/\sigma_{\perp}\) to arrive at \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(a,b\|{x_i},{y_i}) & = & A p(a,b)(\_i d_i\^2)\^-N/2 So, if we ignore the prior factor, the best fit line is simply the line that minimizes the sum of the squared perpendicular distances of points from the line.
## Model comparison {#sec:modelcomp}
When we have multiple models to explain data, we are faced with the question of which model is better. There is no unique definition of better and depending upon what we mean by better we can come up with different criteria to compare models. We have two main schools of thought, a) to compare the probability of the model given the data and b) to compare the expected predictive accuracy of the model for the future data. The former is inherently a Bayesian approach and is known as Bayesian model comparison. The latter is inspired by frequentist ideas but can also be argued from a Bayesian perspective .
### Bayesian model comparison
In the Bayesian formulation, the usefulness of a model is indicated by the probability of a model \(M\) given the data \(D\), \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(M\|D)=. The prior model probability \(p(M)\) is generally assumed to be unity. Note in some cases it may not be so, and we might have more reason to believe one model over the other. The \(p(D)\) is the same for all models, so it is irrelevant when comparing models. Thus the main thing we need to compute is the evidence \(p(D|M)\) (also know as marginal likelihood). Hence, for two models \(M_1\) and \(M_2\), the odds ratio in favor of \(M_2\) compared to \(M_1\) is mainly determined by the ratio of their evidences, \(B_{21}\), also known as the "Bayes factor" [for a review and a guide to interpreting the Bayes factor, see @kass1995bayes]. \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] & = & ==B\_21 For some given data \(D\) and a model \(M\) parameterized by \(\theta\), we have \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\|D,M)=. [\[equ:bayesfac1\]]{#equ:bayesfac1 label="equ:bayesfac1"} The evidence \(p(D|M)\) appears as the denominator on the right hand side and can be obtained by integrating both sides of over all \(\theta\). For properly normalized quantities, the left hand side integrates to unity, leading to \(p(D|M)=\int p(D|\theta,M)p(\theta|M) {\rm d}\theta\). Note, the Bayes factor depends upon the adopted range of the prior which leads to some conceptual difficulties. The range of prior is not an issue for parameter estimation but it is for model selection; we cannot use improper priors. In most cases, we do have a reasonable sense of the range of priors and they are unlikely to extend to infinity. To better understand the role of priors, consider two models \(M_1\) and \(M_2\), where \(M_2\) has a free parameter \(\theta\), while \(M_1\) has no free parameter (with \(\theta\) being fixed to \(\theta_0\)). Let \(\Delta \theta_{\rm likelihood}\) be the characteristic width of the likelihood distribution and \(\Delta \theta_{\rm prior}\) the range of a uniform prior which encloses the likelihood peak. The Bayes factor in favor of model \(M_2\) as compared to \(M_1\) is then \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] B\_21 &=& = = = . The first term on the right hand side will in general be greater than one and will favor \(M_2\), as the simpler model \(M_1\) is a special case of \(M_2\). However, the second term penalizes \(M_2\) if it has a large range in priors. The conceptual difficulty associated with the dependence of the Bayes factor on the adopted prior range is alleviated if one thinks of hypothesis as a specification of a model as well as the prior on its parameters. A model \(M_2\) with a larger range in priors allows for a larger number of possible data sets consistent with the hypothesis as compared to a simpler model \(M_1\) with narrow range of prior. Hence \(p(D|M_2)\), being a normalized probability over possible data sets, will be lower as compared to \(p(D|M_1)\). Also, \(M_1\) is more precise as a hypothesis as compared with \(M_2\). If we have more free parameters in a model, the penalty term in the Bayes factor will be higher, being of the form \(\prod_{i=1}^{d} \Delta \theta_{\rm likelihood,i}/\Delta \theta_{\rm prior,i}\). In this sense, the Bayes factor has a built-in safeguard to prevent overfitting (a model with a large number of free parameters will fit a given set of data better but will perform poorly when presented with new data).
Computing the Bayes factor or the Bayesian evidence is computationally challenging. Generally, the likelihood is peaked and confined to a narrow region in the prior range, but has long tails whose contributions cannot be neglected. Some commonly employed numerical techniques are (1) simulated annealing, (2) nested sampling, (3) Laplace's approximation, (4) Lebesgue integration theory, and (5) the Savage-Dickey density ratio. Two useful approximations of the Bayes free energy \(\mathcal{F}=-\ln p(D|M)\) are \[\begin{aligned}
{\rm BIC}/2 =&-\ln p(Y|\hat{\theta})+(d \ln n)/2 &\textrm{}\\ {\rm WBIC}/2 =& \mathbb{E}_{\theta}^{\beta}[-\ln p(Y|\theta)] \mathrm{\ where\ } \beta=\frac{1}{\ln n} &\textrm{}, \end{aligned}\] Here, \({\rm E}_{\theta}^{\beta}\) denotes expectation taken over the posterior distribution \(p(\theta|Y) \propto p(Y|\theta)^{\beta}p(\theta)\) of \(\theta\). The case of \(\beta=1\) corresponds to the Bayesian estimation of the posterior. The posterior can be sampled using an MCMC algorithm Assuming weak priors and that the posterior is asymptotically normal we have \(\mathcal{F}=\mathrm{BIC} +O(1)\). WBIC is an improved version of BIC, which is also applicable for singular statistical models where BIC fails. A model is singular if the Fisher information matrix is not positive definite, which typically occurs when the model contains hierarchical layers or has hidden variables.
### Predictive methods for Model comparison
A statistical model \(p(x|\theta)\) can be thought of as an approximation of the true distribution \(q(x)\) from which the observed data \(Y=\{y_1,y_2...,y_n\}\) were generated. \(Y\) represents a set of independently observed data points such that \(p(Y|\theta)=\prod_{i=1}^{n}p(y_i|\theta)\). The Bayesian predictive distribution can then be defined as \(p(x|Y)={\rm E}_{\theta}[p(x|\theta)]\), while the maximum likelihood estimate is given by \(p(x|\hat{\theta}(Y))\). Predictive methods judge models by their ability to fit future data \(X=\{x_1,x_2...,x_n\}\), e.g., via the log-likelihood function \(-\ln p(X|Y)\). Given that we do not have future data, the idea is to measure out-of-sample-prediction error from the sample at hand. Cross validation is a natural way to do this, where we divide the current data set into training and testing samples. But this is computationally costly. Hence, alternate criteria have been developed. We start by computing the training error \(T_e = -\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln p(y_i|Y)\). However, this is a biased estimator of \(\mathbb{E}_x[-\ln p(x|Y)]\) as the data are used twice, once to estimate the model and once more to compute the log likelihood of the data. If we have more parameters in the model, it will certainly fit the given data better but will also give rise to larger variance in the estimator, and we need to penalize the model for this. This variance, which represents the effective degrees of freedom in the model, can be calculated from the data and the model. A list of some useful information criteria based on the above idea are given below. They can be easily computed using samples of \(\theta\) obtained by an MCMC simulation of the posterior \(p(\theta|Y)\).
\[\begin{aligned}
{\rm AIC}/2 =&-\ln p(Y|\hat{\theta})+d & \textrm{}\\ {\rm DIC}_{1}/2 =& -\ln p(Y|{\rm E}_{\theta}^{1}[\theta])+2\left( \ln p(Y| {\rm E}_{\theta}[\theta])-{\rm E}_{\theta}^{1}[\ln p(Y| \theta)] \right) &\textrm{} \\ {\rm DIC}_{2}/2 =& -\ln p(Y|{\rm E}_{\theta}^{1}[\theta])+2 {\rm Var}_{\theta}^{1}[\ln p(Y|\theta)] &\textrm{}\\ {\rm WAIC}_{1}/2 =&-\sum_i^{n} \ln {\rm E}_{\theta}^{1}[p(y_i|\theta)] +2\sum_i^{n} \ln {\rm E}_{\theta}^{1}[p(y_i| \theta)]-{\rm E}_{\theta}^{1}[\ln p(y_i| \theta)] &\textrm{}\\ {\rm WAIC}_{2}/2 =&-\sum_i^{n} \ln {\rm E}_{\theta}^{1}[p(y_i|\theta)] +\sum_i^{n} {\rm Var}_{\theta}^{1}[\ln p(y_i|\theta)] &\textrm{} \end{aligned}\] Here, \({\rm Var}_{\theta}^{1}\) denotes variance taken over the posterior distribution \(p(Y|\theta)p(\theta)\) of \(\theta\). The first term is a measure of how well the model fits the observed data while the second term is a penalty for the degrees of freedom \(d\) in the model. In general, the predictive criteria have a well-defined information-theoretic interpretation. Specifically, the expected value of AIC and WAIC, is equivalent to the expected Kullback-Leibler divergence \(\int q(x )\ln [(q(x)/ p(x|Y)] dx\) of the predictive distribution from the true distribution, the expectation is taken over the random realizations of the observed data set \(Y\), which samples the true distribution \(q(x)\). Also, in the asymptotic limit of large sample size, both AIC and WAIC are equivalent to leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). An extra parameter in a model need not necessarily contribute to extra variance in the predictive density, e.g., if we have informative priors on the parameter, the likelihood has a very weak dependence on the parameter or if the model is hierarchical then multiple parameters might be restricted. The use of AIC can be problematic in such cases. DIC and WAIC overcome this problem by estimating the effective degrees of freedom directly from the likelihood function of the data and samples of \(\theta\) obtained from the posterior \(p(\theta|Y)\). WAIC offers some additional advantages as compared to AIC and DIC. AIC and DIC use a point estimate for \(\theta\) when computing predictive density, whereas WAIC uses the Bayesian predictive density. If a model is singular, criteria such as AIC, DIC and BIC do not work well. In contrast, WAIC works for such cases, and in the asymptotic limit of large sample size, WAIC is always equivalent to Bayesian LOOCV. It is instructive to study the differences between BIC and AIC, as they represent two very different approaches to the problem of model selection . Due to the presence of the \(\ln n\) term, for \(n>7\) the BIC penalizes free parameters more heavily as compared to AIC. So BIC is more parsimonious or cautious when it comes to admitting new parameters in a model. In situations where two models can give rise to the same predictive distribution, BIC will favor the model with fewer degrees of freedom while AIC will treat them equally. An example is nested models, where a simpler model can be considered as a special case of a complex model but with few of its parameters being fixed. Interestingly, AIC can also be argued to be using the approach of Bayes factors, but with a prior whose variance decreases with sample size \(n\), whereas BIC would correspond to the choice of a weak prior with fixed variance. To conclude, the Bayesian and the predictive methods both have their strengths and weaknesses. If the choice of priors is well justified, then the methods based on Bayes factor are best suited for model selection. However, if our aim is best predictive accuracy for future data, predictive methods like WAIC are a better choice.
# Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian computations {#sec:mcmc}
Having discussed how to set up problems in the Bayesian framework, we now discuss methods to perform the inference, i.e., how to estimate the pdf of parameters given the data. Except for some simple cases, closed form analytical solutions are in general not available. So one makes use of Monte Carlo based methods to sample from the desired distribution. The most popular method to do this today is the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. MCMC is a class of methods for sampling a pdf using a Markov chain whose equilibrium distribution is the desired distribution. Once we have a sample distributed according to some desired distribution, we can compute expectation values and integrals of various quantities in a process analogous to Monte Carlo integration. The word Monte Carlo in MCMC comes from the use of random numbers to drive the Markov process and the close analogy to Monte Carlo integration schemes. Note in conventional Monte Carlo integration, the random samples are statistically independent whereas in MCMC they are correlated. We first broach the theory behind Markov chains and then discuss specific MCMC methods based on it.
## Markov Chain {#sec:markovchain}
A Markov chain is a sequence of random variables \(X_1,..., X_n\) such that, given the present state, the future and past are independent. It is formally written as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] Prob(X\_n+1=x\| X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2\...,X_n=x_n) & = & Prob(X\_n+1=x\| X_n=x_n) In other words, the conditional distribution of \(X_{n+1}\) in future, depends only upon the present state \(X_n\). If the probability of transition is independent of \(n\), it is a time-homogeneous chain. Such a chain is defined by specifying the probabilities of transitioning from one state to another. To simplify mathematical notation, we sometimes consider the state space to be continuous and sometimes discrete. But the presented results are equally valid for either type of spaces. For a continuous state space where a probability density can be defined we can write the transition probability as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] K(x,y)=Prob(X\_n+1=y\|X_n=x) For a discrete state space the transition probability is a matrix and is written as \(K_{xy}\). On a given state space, a time-homogeneous Markov chain has a stationary distribution (invariant measure) \(\pi\) if \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] (y)=dx (x) K(x,y) A Markov chain is irreducible if it can go from any state \(x\) of a discrete state space to any other state \(y\) in a finite number of steps, i.e., there exists an integer \(n\) such that \(K^n_{xy}>0\). If a chain having a stationary distribution is irreducible, the stationary distribution is unique, and the chain is positive recurrent. For an aperiodic, positive recurrent chain with stationary distribution \(\pi\), the distribution is limiting (equilibrium distribution). This means if we start with any initial distribution \(\lambda\) (a row vector specifying probability over states of a discrete state space) and apply the transition operator \(K\) (a matrix) many times, the final distribution will approach the stationary distribution \(\pi\) (a row vector), \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] \_n ̍K\^n-=̍0. For an irreducible Markov chain with a unique stationary distribution \(\pi\), there is a law of large numbers which says that the expectation value of a function \(g(x)\) over \(\pi\) approaches the average taken over the output of a Markov chain, \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] E\_\[g(x)\] = g(x) (x) dx = \_n \_i=1\^n g(x_i). This property allows one to compute Monte Carlo estimates of specific quantities of interest from a Markov chain. Techniques that do this are known as Markov chain Monte Carlo or MCMC. A chain having a stationary distribution is said to be reversible if the chain starting from a stationary distribution looks the same when run forward or backward in time. In other words, if \(X_n\) has distribution \(\pi\) then the pair \((X_{n},X_{n+1})\) has the same joint distribution as \((X_{n+1},X_{n})\). \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] Prob(X_n,X\_n+1)=Prob(X\_n+1,X\_n) For the transition kernel \(K\) this means \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] (X_n)K(X\_n,X\_n+1)=(X\_n+1)K(X\_n+1,X\_n) and is known as the *condition of detailed balance*. For a Markov chain, it is not necessary to satisfy reversibility in order to have a stationary distribution. However, reversibility guarantees the existence of a stationary distribution, and is thus a stronger condition. This is the reason that most MCMC algorithms are designed to satisfy detailed balance.
## Metropolis Hastings algorithm {#sec:mhalgo}
The most general MCMC algorithm is the Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithm . Suppose we are interested in sampling a distribution \(f(x)\) on a state space \(E\), with \(x \in E\). To construct a transition kernel \(K(x,y)\) to go from \(x\) to \(y\), MH algorithm uses a two step process:
- Specify a proposal distribution \(q(y|x)\).
- Accept draws from \(q(y|x)\) with acceptance ratio \(\alpha(x,y)= {\rm min}\left[1,\frac{f(y)q(x|y)}{f(x)q(y|x)}\right]\).
So the transition kernel is given by \(K(x,y)=q(y|x)\alpha(x,y)\). The full algorithm is as follows
The transition kernel of the MH algorithm is reversible and satisfies detailed balance, \(f(x)K(x,y)=f(y)K(y,x)\). Note the reversibility condition by itself does not lead to a unique form for the acceptance ratio \(\alpha(x,y)\) and alternatives exist. However, it has been shown that the acceptance ratio of the MH algorithm results in a chain with the fastest mixing rate. There are multiple ways to construct the proposal distribution \(q\) each leading to a new version of the MH algorithm.
- **Symmetric Metropolis:** \(q(y|x)=q(x|y)\) which simplifies the acceptance probability to \({\rm min}\left\{1,f(y)/f(x)\right\}\); this is the version that was proposed by Metropolis and colleagues.
- **Random walk Metropolis-Hastings (RWMH):** \(q(y|x)=q(y-x)\); the direction and distance of the new point from the current point is independent of the current point. Common choices are \(N(x,\sigma^2)\) and \({\rm Uniform}(x-\sigma,x+\sigma)\).
- **Independence sampler:** \(q(y|x)=q(y)\); i.e., the new state is drawn independent of the current state. The acceptance probability is given by \({\rm min}\left\{1,\frac{f(y)q(x)}{f(x)q(y)}\right\}\), a generalization of the accept-reject algorithm. The quantity \(q(x)\) should resemble \(f(x)\) but with longer tails.
- **Langevin algorithm:** \(q(y|x) \sim N(x+\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\nabla \log f(x),\sigma^2)\); this is useful when the gradient is available.
Except when \(f(y)=f(x)\) (uniform target density), the mean of the acceptance ratio \(\alpha\) is always less than unity. Decreasing \(\sigma\) in the RWMH algorithm increases \(\alpha\) but lowers the independence of the sampler. Increasing \(\sigma\) improves the independence but lowers \(\alpha\). In the Langevin algorithm, one makes use of the information in the gradient to allow faster mixing of the chain.
## Gibbs sampling {#sec:gibbs}
The Gibbs sampler introduced by is one of the most popular computational methods for doing Bayesian computations. Suppose we want to sample \(f(x)\) where \(x \in \chi \subseteq \mathcal{R}^d\). In Gibbs sampling, the transition kernel \(K(x,y)\) is split into multiple steps. In each step, one coordinate is advanced based on its conditional density with respect to other coordinates. The algorithm is as follows:
The full transition kernel is written as, \[} \def\eeq{\] \_1 d(x\_t+1\|x\_t)=\_i=1\^d f(x\^i\_t+1\|x\^1\_t+1\...x\^i-1\_t+1,x\^i+1\_t\...,x\^d\_t+1). Similarly one can define a reverse move, \[} \def\eeq{\] \_d (x_t\|x\_t+1)=\_i=d\^1 f(x\^i\_t\|x\^1\_t+1\...x\^i-1\_t+1,x\^i+1\_t\...,x\^d\_t+1). It can be easily shown that \[} \def\eeq{\] f(x\_t)\_1d(x\_t+1\|x\_t) = f(x\_t+1)\_d(x\_t\|x\_t+1). Integrating both sides leads to \[} \def\eeq{\] f(x\_t)\_1d(x\_t+1\|x\_t) dx= f(y). Thus, \(f\) is the stationary distribution of the Markov chain formed by the transition kernel \(\kappa_{1\to d}(x_{t+1}|x_{t})\). Note the Gibbs sampler as given above (*systematic* scan) is not reversible. However, the reversible ones can easily be produced, e.g., at each iteration picking a random component to update (random-scan). The random-scan Gibbs sampler can be viewed as a special case of MH sampler with acceptance ratio \({\rm min}(1,\frac{f(y)q(x|y)}{f(x)q(y|x)})=1\). It follows that \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] f(y)q(x\|y) &= & f(y\^i\|y\_-i)f(y\^-i)f(x\^i\|y\^-i) = f(y\^i\|x\^-i)f(x\^-i)f(x\^i\|x\^-i)\
& = & f(x\^i\|x\^-i)f(x\^-i)f(y\^i\|x\^-i) = f(x)q(y\|x). Here, \(x^{-i}=\{x^1...,x^{i-1},x^{i+1}...,x^{d}\}\) and \(y^{-i}=x^{-i}\), as only the \(i\)-th component is changed in each step.
## Metropolis within Gibbs {#sec:mwg}
One problem with the Gibbs sampler is that it requires one to sample from the conditional distributions which can be difficult. In such cases, one can replace the sampling of conditional densities with the MH step. This then becomes the Metropolis within Gibbs (MWG) scheme, which is shown in Algorithm [\[MWG\]](#MWG){reference-type="ref" reference="MWG"} (it is implemented in the code that we provide).
Rather than updating all the variables step by step, one can also choose to update a subset of variables together, leading to block updates. The fact that the full sampling of a complicated distribution can be broken up into a sequence of smaller and easier samplings, is the main strength of the Gibbs sampler and has resulted in its widespread use.
## Adaptive Metropolis {#sec:adapmetro}
The efficiency of the MH algorithm depends crucially upon the proposal distribution. By efficiency we typically mean how independent are the samples. If the samples are not independent then they have high correlation. For Markov chains, the correlation falls off with distance between samples. If the correlation is large, this means the mixing in the chain is slow. If the width of the proposal distribution is too small, the acceptance ratio is high but the chain mixes very slowly. If the width of the proposal distribution is too large, the acceptance ratio is too small and the chain again mixes slowly (see for an illustration of this effect). showed that optimal covariance matrix \(\Sigma\) for the RWMH algorithm using the multivariate normal distribution is \((2.38^2/\mathcal{D})\Sigma_{\pi}\), where \(\mathcal{D}\) is the dimensionality of the space and \(\Sigma_{\pi}\) is the covariance matrix of the target distribution \(\pi\). The optimal acceptance ratio \(\alpha_{\rm opt}\) is 0.44 for dimension \(\mathcal{D}=1\) and then falls off with increasing number of dimensions reaching an asymptotic value of \(0.23\) for \(\mathcal{D} \to \infty\). The convergence is quite fast (\(\alpha=\)\[0.441, 0.352, 0.316, 0.279, 0.275, 0.266\] for \(\mathcal{D}=\)\[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\]). The efficiency as compared to independent samples is \(0.331/\mathcal{D}\). These results suggest a possible way to choose the optimal proposal distribution. Estimate the covariance matrix \(\Sigma_{\pi}\) by a trial run and then use it for the actual run. Even doing this is cumbersome as it is unclear how long the trial run should be. To circumvent this, proposed an adaptive scheme in which \(\Sigma\) is updated on the fly using past values. Naively, any scheme that uses proposals that depend upon the full past history violates the Markovian property, i.e., the future should only depend on the present and should be independent of the past. The trick is to adapt the proposal distribution in such a way that it converges to the optimal one. The resulting chain then also converges to the target distribution. showed that such a scheme can be described as part of a more general adaptive framework. At the heart of most adaptive algorithms is the recursion. They proposed an iterative stochastic algorithm to find roots of functions that are stochastic, i.e., their algorithm solves \(M(x)=\alpha\), where instead of \(M(x)\) the function available is \(N(x)\), which is stochastic and is such that \(\langle N(x) \rangle=M(x)\). Starting with some initial value \(x_0\) the algorithm to get the \(n+1\)th iterate is \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] x\_n+1=x_n+\_n(-N(x_n)) Here \(\gamma_1,\gamma_2...\) is a sequence of positive steps. The \(x_n\) then converge to the true solution provided the sequence \(\gamma_n\) satisfies \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] \_n=0\^ \_n= [and]{.roman} \_n=0\^ \_n\^2 \< The first condition makes sure that irrespective of where we start, the solution can be reached in a finite number of steps. The second condition makes sure that we do converge. A possible choice of \(\gamma_n\) is \(\gamma_n=\gamma/n^{\beta}\) where \(0<\beta<1\). A nice description of various adaptive algorithms is given by. Below we discuss Algorithm 4 from their paper which is quite general and is implemented in the software that we provide.
If \(\beta\) is too small, the convergence is too slow; if \(\beta\) is too large the convergence is too fast and the simulation can quickly lean towards a wrong solution and will take a long time to get out of it. For adaptive MCMC, we find a choice of \(\beta=0.6\) to be satisfactory for most test cases. d shows an adaptive MCMC chain obtained using Algorithm [\[AMH1\]](#AMH1){reference-type="ref" reference="AMH1"}. The adaptive chain looks very similar to the ideal case shown in b, and this demonstrates the usefulness of the adaptive MCMC scheme.
## Affine invariant sampling {#sec:affine}
An elegant solution to the problem of tuning the proposal density is to use the idea of ensemble samplers. Here multiple chains (walkers) are run in parallel but allowed to interact in such a way that they can adapt their proposal densities. provide a general purpose algorithm to do this, known as the affine invariant sampler [see also @christen2010general]. A python implementation of this (emcee: the MCMC hammer, ) is provided by and is widely used in astronomy. We now describe this algorithm. We saw in the previous section that adapting the proposal density can violate the Markovian property of a chain. The trick lies in using the information available in the ensemble but in a way that does not violate the Markovian property. This is achieved by using the idea of partial resampling which is a generalized version of the Gibbs sampling procedure. Let us consider an ensemble of walkers \(X=(x_1,x_2...,x_L)\) and a Markov chain that walks on a product space with distribution \(\Pi(X)=\pi(x_1)\pi(x_2)...\pi(x_L)\). Then if \(x_i\) is updated conditional on other walkers \(x_{[-i]}=\{x_1...,x_{i-1},x_{i+1}...,x_L\}\) (complementary set of walkers), but satisfying detailed balance \(p(y_i|x_i,x_{[-i]})=p(x_i|y_i,x_{[-i]})\), then each walker samples from \(\pi(x)\). One way to do this is to choose a point \(x_j\) from \(x_{[-i]}\) and a scalar \(r\) with density \(g(r)\), and propose a new point \(y\) as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] y=x_i+(r-1)(x_i-x_j)=x_j+r(x_i-x_j). The inverse transformation is given by \(x_i=x_j+(y-x_j)/r\). Now if we want the proposal to be symmetric then \(q(y_i|x_i,x_{[-i]})=q(x_i|y_i,x_{[-i]})\), and this implies \(g(1/r)=rg(r)\). A good choice of such a function is \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] g(r)= [for]{.roman} r [and]{.roman} a\>1. To satisfy detailed balance, the acceptance probability is given by \(\textrm{min}\left[1,r^{n-1}\frac{\pi(Y)}{\pi(X_i)}\right]\). The factor \(r^{n-1}\) is because the proposal is restricted along a line and not the full hypersphere over the actual space. This means an appropriate Jacobian has to be calculated; for details see and (the proof is much easier when using the reversible jump MCMC formalism of ). Moves other than the stretch move can also be constructed, e.g. a proposal \(y=x_i+W\), where \(W\) has a covariance computed from a subset of walkers in the complementary sample. It is also possible to construct algorithms which use a combination of both the stretch and the walk move. Although the affine invariant algorithm elegantly solves the problem of choosing a suitable proposal distributions, it has one drawback. The computational cost of warm-up scales linearly with the number of walkers. Note, like most other MCMC algorithms, multimodal distributions (distributions with many well separated peaks) also pose a problem for this algorithm.
## Convergence Diagnostics {#sec:convergence}
Having studied MCMC methods in order to sample from distributions, we now discuss how to detect convergence; i.e., how long should we run an MCMC chain. Several convergence diagnostics have been proposed in the literature. provide a good review of 13 convergence diagnostics. Other reviews include and. Unfortunately, because there is no method to detect convergence, we can only detect failure to converge. So convergence diagnostics are necessary conditions but not sufficient. Below we present two schemes to monitor convergence. The first scheme makes use of the correlation length of the chain to compute the effective number of independent samples in a chain. The second scheme makes use of multiple chains to see if they are converging.
### Effective sample size
Let us begin by estimating how many independent samples we need to get reliable estimates of mean and variance of a quantity. For a posterior of some variable \(x\) with standard deviation \(\sigma_x\), the Monte Carlo standard error goes as \(\sigma_x/\sqrt{N}\) for sample of size \(N\). So to measure the mean of a quantity with about 3% error as compared to the overall uncertainty \(\sigma_x\) we need \(N=1000\). showed that to measure \(0.025\) quantile to within \(\pm0.005\) with probability 0.95 requires about 4000 independent samples. However, the MCMC is not an independent sampler. As we have seen, the points in an MCMC chain are correlated. Autocorrelation provides a measure of this. Autocorrelation \(\rho_{xx}(t)\) for a sequence is the correlation between two points separated by a fixed distance \(t\); i.e. \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] \_xx(t)= An automatic windowing procedure is discussed by for the computation of integrated autocorrelation. Typically the autocorrelation falls off exponentially as \(\sim \exp^{-t/\tau_{x}}\) and \(\tau_{x}\) is known as the correlation time (or correlation length). The integrated autocorrelation is defined as \(\tau_{\rm int,x}=(1/2) \sum_{t=-\infty}^{\infty} \rho_{xx}(t)\). The variance of the mean of \(x\) for a sample of size \(N\) can be shown to be \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] Var(\|x)=(2 \_int,x) So for correlated samples the variance is \(2 \tau_{\rm int,x}\) times larger than the variance of independent samples. Using \(\tau_{\rm int,x}\), one can measure the number of effective independent samples in a correlated chain \(-\) also known as the *effective sample size* (ESS) \(-\) as \(N/(2\tau_{\rm int,x})\) and then use it to decide if we have enough samples (e.g., \(1000<\:\)ESS\(\:<4000\)).
### Variance between chains
The most widely used criterion for studying convergence was first presented by. Let us suppose we have \(M\) chains each consisting of \(2N\) iterations out of which we use only the last \(N\) iterations. For any given scalar parameter of interest \(\theta\), let \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] \|\_j=\_i=1\^n\_i,j [ and ]{.roman} \|=\_j=1\^m\|\_j The index \(i\) runs over points in a chain, and the index \(j\) runs over the chains. Then the between chain variance and the mean within chain variance can be written as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] B=\_j=1\^m(\|\_j-\|)\^2 [ and ]{.roman} W=\_j=1\^m \_i=1\^n(\_i,j-\|\_j)\^2. The total variance \(\hat{\sigma}^2\) for the estimator \(\bar{\theta}\) can be written as a weighted average of \(W\) and \(B\), \(\hat{\sigma}^2=W(n-1)/n+B\). If we account for the sampling variability of the estimator \(\bar{\theta}\), then this yields a pooled variance of \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] V=\^2+=W+B for the mixture of chains. If the initial distribution is over-dispersed, then \(B>\sigma^2\) and \(V\) always overestimates the true variance \(\sigma^2\). For any finite \(n\), \(W\) is expected to be less than \(\sigma^2\), as individual sequences in a chain would not have had the time to explore the full target distribution. So, initially we expect \(V/W>1\). However, in the limit \(n\to \infty\), the variance \(B\) between chains, which is expected to fall off as \(1/n\), goes to 0 and \(W\) will approach the true variance \(\sigma^2\), making \(V/W\) approach 1. Therefore the ratio \(\hat{R}=\sqrt{V/W}\), also known as the potential scale reduction factor, can be used to monitor the convergence.
### Thinning
For making inferences from an MCMC chain, some algorithms use only the \(k\)-th iteration of each sequence such that successive draws are approximately independent, a process known as *thinning*. However, there is no additional advantage of thinning other than savings in storage. Since we are throwing away information, an estimate from a thinned chain can never be better than the original chain . Moreover, it is difficult to choose an appropriate \(k\) without studying the autocorrelation of the full chain. So thinning is useful only in situations where the autocorrelation is known a priori and is known to be large. Here again \(k\) should be chosen such that it is smaller than the autocorrelation length, to retain as much information as possible.
## Parallel Tempering {#sec:partemp}
Multimodal distributions in general pose problems for all MCMC algorithms. Parallel tempering is one way to address this problem. It is a type of ensemble sampler where multiple chains are simulated in parallel but are allowed to exchange information. Each chain has a target distribution different from the other and is controlled by a parameter \(T\) known as the temperature. Let \(\pi(x)=\exp(-H(x))\) be the actual target distribution, then a ladder of distributions \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] \_i(x)=(-H(x)/T_i), i=1\....n is created, controlled via the parameter \(T_i\), such that \(T_1>T_2>...>T_{n}\). \(T_n\) is set to 1. Hence, \(\pi_n\) represents the target distribution. The temperature broadens the target distribution and allows a wider exploration of the parameter space which makes it useful to explore multimodal distributions. To exchange information between the chains, a state swapping procedure is used. A swap is proposed between a randomly chosen chain \(i\) and its neighbors \(i-1\) and \(i+1\) with probability \(q_{i,i-1}=q_{i,i+1}=0.5\) and \(q_{1,2}=q(n,n-1)=1\). Naively, accepting the swap will violate the detailed balance condition. So the swap proposal is accepted with probability \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p\_ij= min(1,) =min(1,()) which satisfies detailed balance. In parallel tempering the temperature ladder needs to be chosen carefully. If the neighboring temperatures are too far apart, the acceptance rate will be diminished leading to slow mixing. If the neighboring temperatures are too close, a large number of elements in the ladder will be required to explore a wide range in parameter space, and this can increase the computational cost significantly. However, by exploiting the trial runs, a suitable ladder can be constructed. The idea of parallel tempering can be generalized to construct evolutionary algorithms that incorporate features of genetic algorithms into the framework of MCMC. The basic idea is to have parallel chains as in parallel tempering and allow exchange of information while satisfying detailed balance on the product space defined by the chains. The exchange of information is based on ideas of mutation and crossover from genetic algorithms .
## Monte Carlo Metropolis Hastings {#sec:mcmh}
[\[sec:MCMH\]]{#sec:MCMH label="sec:MCMH"}
In MCMC based Bayesian inference, we are concerned with simulating samples from some pdf \(p(\theta|x)=p(x|\theta)p(\theta)\). However, there are situations when \(p(x|\theta)\) cannot be easily evaluated or is not available in an analytically tractable form. In such situations one can make use of Monte Carlo based techniques to approximately evaluate \(p(\theta|x)\). More generally, the Metropolis Hastings ratio \(r=p(\theta'|x)/p(\theta|x)\) is used to update an MCMC chain. In such techniques, typically, one generates a set of auxiliary samples \(Y=\{y_1...,y_m\}\) conditioned on \(\theta\) and then uses them to compute \(\tilde{p}(\theta|x,Y)\) (an approximation of \(p(\theta|x)\)) or \(\tilde{r}\) (an approximation of the ratio \(r\)). However, Monte Carlo based estimates are stochastic and special care is needed when working with them in an MCMC scheme. An algorithm to make use of Monte Carlo based estimates inside a Metropolis Hastings algorithm is given in (it is implemented in the software that we provide). There are many variants of , depending upon how and at what stage the auxiliary sample is generated \(-\) see Chapter 4 in. The invariant stationary distribution of such Markov chains is not necessarily the target density \(p(\theta|x)\). The characteristics of such chains and their convergence properties are discussed by and. In , the auxiliary sample is refreshed in each iteration and the same sample \(Y\) is used to estimate both \(\tilde{p}(\theta'|x,Y)\) and \(\tilde{p}(\theta|x,Y)\). This makes more robust compared to other similar alternatives. In classical MCMC, one can reuse the previous estimate of \(p(\theta|x)\) when computing \(r\). However, when the Metropolis Hastings ratio \(\tilde{r}\) is stochastic, if \(\tilde{p}(\theta|x,Y)\) is not evaluated in each iteration using a fresh sample of \(Y\), then the MCMC chain tends to get stuck at a stochastic maxima of the estimated likelihood. The smaller the size of the auxiliary sample, or the more inaccurate the Monte Carlo estimate of \(\tilde{r}\), the worse is this problem. Using the same sample \(Y\) to estimate both \(\tilde{p}(\theta'|x)\) and \(\tilde{p}(\theta'|x)\) leads to lower noise in the estimated ratio of \(\tilde{r}\). This property was also noticed by in the context of fitting models of the gravitational potential of the Milky Way to spatio-kinematic data of stars orbiting inside it. Two specific cases where the above algorithm can be used are given below.
### Unknown normalization constant
In fitting a model to data, we are interested in sampling \(p(\theta|x)=p(x|\theta)p(\theta)\). To do this, the function \(p(x|\theta)\) should be properly normalized over the data space, in the sense that \(\int p(x|\theta)dx=1\). However, on many occasions, we have \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(x\|) =(-U(x,))=f(x\|), where \(f(x|\theta)\) is known but the normalization constant \(Z(\theta)\) is not known. An example is the problem of fitting a density profile \(\rho(r|\theta)\) (\(r\) being the Galactocentric distance) to a sample of stars with Galactic latitude \(b>30^{\circ}\), longitude \(l>30^{\circ}\) and heliocentric distance \(s<50\) kpc. Here we have \(Z(\theta)=\int_{b=\pi/6}^{\pi/2} db \int_{0}^{50} ds \int_{\pi/6}^{2\pi} dl \rho(l,b,s|\theta) s^2 cos(b)\). Our aim is to compute the Metropolis Hastings ratio \(r=p(\theta'|x)/p(\theta|x)=[Z(\theta)/Z(\theta')][f(x|\theta')/f(x|\theta)]\) that is used to advance an MCMC chain, and it is the ratio \(R=Z(\theta)/Z(\theta')\) that is unknown. If one can sample exactly from \(f(x|\theta)\), then it is possible to cancel the normalization constant using ingenious algorithms by and . However exact sampling is not always feasible. In such cases a Monte Carlo estimate of the ratio of the unknown normalization constant \(R=Z(\theta)/Z(\theta')\) can be done using samples \(Y=(y_1..., y_m)\) generated from density \(f(y|\theta)\), such that \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] (,';Y)=\_i=1\^m . This sampling can be done by various means, e.g., exact sampling, MCMC, and rejection sampling. If \(f(y|\theta')\) is difficult to sample from, one can use so-called "importance sampling" by drawing samples from a distribution \(g(y|\theta)\) that is easy to sample from. The required ratio of normalization constants is then given by \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] (,';Y)= , and the MH ratio is given by \(\tilde{r}=\tilde{R}(\theta,\theta';Y)[f(x|\theta')/f(x|\theta)]\).
### Marginal inference
Here we are interested in the marginal density \(p(\theta|x)=\int p(\theta,y|x) dy\), but the integral may not be analytically tractable and may also be difficult to do by deterministic schemes. In such situations, the integration can be done by Monte Carlo importance sampling, using auxiliary samples \(Y\) generated from some density \(g(y|\theta)\) that is easy to sample from. Thus we have \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] (\|x,Y)=\_i=1\^m .
## Hamiltonian Monte Carlo {#sec:hmc}
One of the attractive features of MCMC for sampling pdfs is its better performance for higher dimensions. However, for very large dimensions, traditional MCMC algorithms start running into problems. While for lower dimensions, a typical set of the posterior (e.g. region encompassing 99% of the total probability) lies close to the center, for higher dimensions, a typical set lies in a shell that has a very large volume. Since, a shell cannot be traversed with large step sizes, it takes a long time to explore the posterior. Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) tries to address this problem by introducing an auxiliary variable called momentum \(u\) for each real variable \(x\) called position. The log of posterior (target density) \(\pi(x)\) is assumed to define the potential energy \(U(x)=-\ln \pi(x)\), and the momenta define the kinetic energy \(K(u)\). Together they define the Hamiltonian \(H(x,u)=U(x)+K(u)\), where \(K(u)=u^2/2\). The distribution to be explored is \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(x,u)==Next, principles of Hamiltonian dynamics are used to advance a given point to a new location. The point is then accepted or rejected based on the MH algorithm. The use of Hamiltonian dynamics to advance a given point allows the point to travel to locations which are far from its current location. This allows faster exploration of the parameter space. There are two major obstacles involved with using HMC, and this has prevented its widespread use. First, it requires the gradient of the target density. Secondly, it requires two extra parameters to be tuned by the user: a step size \(\epsilon\) to advance from the current state and the number of steps over which to evolve the Hamiltonian system. Considerable progress has been made to address both these issues. The automatic/algorithmic differentiation can be used to accurately compute the derivatives of a given function without any user intervention. The idea is that any function written as a computer program can be described as a sequence of elementary arithmetic operations, and then by applying the chain rule of derivatives repeatedly on these operations, the derivatives can be computed. Alternatively, one can create analytical functions to approximate the target density and use these to compute the derivatives. This is because the exact Hamiltonian is only required when computing the acceptance probability and this does not require derivatives. For simulating the trajectory, one needs derivatives and here one can use an approximate Hamiltonian . An application of HMC for fitting cosmological parameters is given by and. provide additional algorithms for automatic tuning of step size \(\epsilon\) and the number of steps \(L\), known as the No-U-Turn Sampler. This is used in the open-source Bayesian inference package Stan (available at ).
## Population Monte Carlo
Population Monte Carlo is an iterative importance sampling technique that adapts itself at each iteration and produces a sample approximately simulated from the target distribution. The sample along with its importance weights can be used to construct unbiased estimates of quantities integrated over the target distribution. Suppose \(h(x)\) is a quantity of interest. One of the major applications for MCMC applications is to compute integrals like \(J = \int h(x) \pi(x) dx\). In importance sampling, this is replaced by \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] J = \_i=1\^N h(x_i) , where \((x_1...,x_n)\) are sampled from a distribution \(q(x)\) which is easier to sample than \(\pi(x)\). The closer the importance function to the target distribution, the better the quality of the estimate (lower variance). In practise it is difficult to guess a good importance function. The main idea in population Monte Carlo is to start with a reasonable guess of the importance function \(q_0\) and then iteratively improve \(q_t\) by making use of the past set of samples \((x_1^{t-1}...,x_N^{t-1})\). The importance function can adapt not only in time (with each iteration), but also in space, and can be written in general as \(q_{t}(.|x_{i}^{t-1})\). Suppose \(X^t=\{x_1^t...,x_N^t\}\) are the set of points at iteration \(t\). Let \(x_i^t\) be produced from importance distribution \(q_t(x|x_i^{t-1})\). An estimate of \(J\) is then given by \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] J\^t=\_i=1\^n w_i\^t h(x_i\^t) [where]{.roman} \_i\^t= [and]{.roman} w_i\^t=. Thus the expectation value of any function \(h(x)\) computed using importance sampling is unbiased, i.e. \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] & = & h(x) q_t(x\|y) g(y) dx dy = h(x) (x) dx Here \(g\) is distribution of \(X^{t-1}\) and the equality is valid for any \(g\). A simple choice for the importance function is to have set it as a mixture of normal or \(t\)-distributions, e.g., \(q^t(x)=\sum_{d=1}^{D} \alpha_d^t \mathcal{N}(x|\mu_d^t,\Sigma_d^t)\). This has been used for cosmological parameter estimation and model comparison.
## Nested Sampling {#sec:nested}
In , we saw that computing the evidence is computationally challenging. Nested sampling is designed to ease this computation. To compute the evidence, we are interested in computing quantities like \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] Z = L()() d=L() d (). Integration is basically chopping up the full space into small volume elements and summing the contribution of the integrand over these cells. We are free to chop up the volume and order or label the cells as we wish. So we divide the space by iso-likelihood contours and define a variable \(X\) to label them. A convenient choice is the prior probability mass enclosed by an iso-likelihood contour, i.e. \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] X(L)=\_L()\>L () dIf the the prior probability is normalized, then it ranges from 0 for the highest likelihood, to 1 for the lowest likelihood. Given the above definition, we can also define an inverse function \(L(X)\), which is the likelihood that encloses a probability mass of \(X\). So the integral for \(Z\) can now be written as \(Z=\int L(X)dX\). Suppose we generate \(N\) samples uniformly from the prior distribution. Next, we sort them in decreasing sequence of \(L\) to give prior mass \(X_i=i/N\). Then using trapezoidal rule, one can easily perform the numerical integration. However, a significant contribution to the integral comes from a region with small prior mass \(X\). So, the integral should be done in equal steps in \(\ln(X)\) rather than \(X\). This can be done using an iterative procedure. We start with a set \(A\) of \(N\) points drawn from the prior. At each iteration, let \(L_i\) be the point with lowest \(L\); we replace it in set \(A\) with a new point drawn uniformly from the prior but satisfying \(L>L_i\). This generates a sequence of \(L_{i}\) for which the expected \(X_i=\exp(-i/N)\). Nested sampling is widely used for cosmological model selection and parameter estimation. Three publicly available packages based on nested sampling are CosmoNest, MultiNest and DNEST.
# Bayesian hierarchical modelling (BHM) {#sec:bhm}
In the simplest setting, we have some observed data \(Y\) generated by some model having parameters \(\theta\) which can be inferred using the Bayes theorem as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\|Y) p(Y\|)p(), where \(p(\theta)\) denotes our prior knowledge or belief about \(\theta\). If the model parameters \(\theta\) depend upon another set of parameters \(y\) through \(p(\theta|\phi)p(\phi)\), then \(\theta\) and \(\phi\) can be inferred using \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(,\|Y) p(Y\|)p(\|)p(). The variable \(\phi\) is known as the hyperparameter and \(p(\phi)\), the distribution of the hyperparameter, as a hyperprior. Alternatively, the observed data \(Y\) may depend upon another set of hidden variables \(X\), which in turn depend on \(\theta\). The inference of \(\theta\) and \(X\) can then be established using \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(,X\|Y) p(Y\|X)p(X\|)p(). Such situations lead to hierarchies and Bayesian models of this type are known as hierarchical models. It turns out that hierarchies are quite common in real world applications, often where more than two levels exist, and Bayesian hierarchical modelling provides a framework for capturing this. Let us consider a simple example, for details see. Suppose we observe some data \(Y\) (a set of measurements of some variable \(y\)) with uncertainty \(\sigma\), and we are interested in the mean \(\alpha=\bar{y}\). Now suppose that the data \(Y=\{y_{ij}|0<j<J, 0<i<n_j\}\) are grouped into \(J\) independent groups, and we have reason to believe that the group mean \(\alpha_j\) varies from group to group. For observations within a group \(j\), our model is \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(y\_.j\|\_j,)=(y\_.j\|\_j,\^2), where we denote by \(y_{.j}\) an observation belonging to group \(j\). We now compute the group mean \(\bar{y}_{.j}\), instead of global mean \(\bar{y}\), to capture the variation of mean across groups. A global mean is certainly an inaccurate description of data, whenever the group mean is far away from the global mean. However, if the number of data points in a group is very small, e.g., \(n_j=2\), then the uncertainty in the group mean is large and it is much better to trust the global mean than the group mean. Bayesian hierarchical modelling provides a natural way to handle the above problem of group means. It can act like a middle ground between the two extremes, global mean versus group mean. To demonstrate this, we set up the above problem using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Suppose the group means are distributed according to a normal distribution \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\_j\|,)=(\_j\|,\^2) where \(\mu\) and \(\omega\) are unknown parameters of the model. The \(\mu\), \(\omega\) and the group means \(\alpha=\{\alpha_1...,\alpha_J\}\) can then be inferred from data \(Y\) using \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(,,\|Y) & & p(Y\|,)p(\|,)p(,) p(,) \_j=1\^J p(\_j\|,)\_i=1\^n_j p(y\_ij\|\_j,) We generated synthetic data with \(\mu=0\), \(\omega=1\), \(J=40\), \(\sigma=1\) and \(2<n_j<10\); we then estimated \(\alpha\), \(\mu\) and \(\omega\) (assuming flat priors for \(\mu\) and \(\omega\)). The results are shown in . The BHM based group mean estimates are systematically shifted with respect to standard group mean estimates ( computed from the data points in a group). The BHM estimates are closer to the global mean than the standard estimates. The shift between the two estimates is more for cases where the error bars are large. The BHM estimates also have smaller error bars. This is because, when estimating the group mean, in addition to points within a group the BHM model also makes use of information available from other groups.
## Expectation maximization, data augmentation and Gibbs sampling {#sec:gsem}
The easiest way to analyze a Bayesian hierarchical model is via Gibbs sampling, and the motivation for doing this was provided by the the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. In fact, the EM algorithm led to the development of the DA algorithm, which in turn provided the idea to use Gibbs sampling to solve Bayesian hierarchical models. Hence we begin by exploring the EM algorithm which is one of the most influential algorithm in the field of statistics. Let us suppose that we have some observed data \(x=\{x_1...,x_N\}\) generated by some model \(p(x|\theta)\) having parameters \(\theta\). We want to compute the most likely parameters of the model given the data, i.e., \(\hat{\theta} = {\rm argmax}_{\theta}[p(x|\theta)]\). The full model is specified by \(p(x,z|\theta)\) with \(p(x,z|\theta)=\prod_{i=1}^{N} p(x_i,z_i|\theta)\), where \(z\) are variables which are either missing or hidden or unobserved. The EM algorithm solves this problem as follows. The algorithm has two steps. It starts with a fiducial value of \(\theta_0\), then does the following at every iteration \(t\).
- E-step: Compute \(Q(\theta|\theta_t,x)= \int dz\ p(z|\theta_t,x) \log p(x,z|\theta)\). In other words, it computes the expectation of the log likelihood \(\log p(x,z|\theta)\) with respect to \(p(z|\theta_t,x)\).
- M-step: Find the value of \(\theta\) that maximizes \(Q(\theta|\theta_t,x)\) and set \(\theta_{t+1}={\rm argmax}_{\theta}[Q(\theta|\theta_t,x)]\).
These steps are repeated iteratively until \(\theta_{t+1} \sim \theta_{t}\). The proof that the EM algorithm increases the likelihood \(p(x|\theta)\) at each stage is as follows. The conditional density of the missing data \(z\) given the observed data \(x\) and the model parameter \(\theta\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(z\|,x)=. Taking the \(\log\) and then the expectation with respect to \(p(z|\theta_t,x)\), we get \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(x\|) & = & dz p(z\|\_t,x) p(x,z\|)-dz p(z\|\_t,x) p(z\|,x),\
& = & Q(\|\_t,x)+S(\|\_t,x), which is valid for any \(\theta\). Using this result, we can compute the difference \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(x\|\_t+1)-p(x\|\_t) = Q(\_t+1\|\_t)-Q(\_t\|\_t)+S(\_t+1\|\_t)-S(\_t\|\_t) Due to the M-step, \(Q(\theta_{t+1}|\theta_{t},x)-Q(\theta_{t}|\theta_{t},x) \geq 0\). Also, from Gibbs' inequality, \(S(\theta_{t+1}|\theta_{t})-S(\theta_{t}|\theta_{t})\geq 0\). This means that each EM iteration is guaranteed to increase the marginal likelihood \(p(x|\theta)\). This guarantees a convergence towards a maximum, but not necessarily a global maximum. The algorithm can still get stuck at a saddle point, or a local maximum. The EM algorithm as presented above is deterministic. In general, it is not always easy to compute the expectation value, as it involves integrals over high dimensions. A general way to compute the \(Q(\theta|\theta_t,x)\), would be to draw \(m\) random samples of \(z\) from distribution \(k(z|\theta_t,x)\) and take its mean. We label this stochastic estimate \(Q_S(\theta|\theta_t,x)\), which in the limit \(m \to \infty\) is same as \(Q(\theta|\theta_t,x)\). Having computed \(Q_S\), the M-step can proceed as usual to maximize it and compute a new \(\theta_{t+1}\). In fact \(m\) can be set to 1. This is the stochastic version of EM (SEM) as given by. Because of stochasticity, one does not get a unique answer but instead a distribution. In fact, SEM generates a Markov chain, which under mild regularity conditions converges to a stationary distribution. The algorithm has an additional advantage in that it is less likely to get stuck at a local maximum. If we now replace the M-step with a draw of \(\theta\) from the \(Q_S(\theta|\theta_t,x)\), this becomes a fully stochastic method; this is, as previously mentioned the DA algorithm of. This is equivalent to a two-step Gibbs Sampler for sampling from \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(,Z\|X) p(X,Z\|)p()
1. Sample \(Z_{t+1}\) from \(p(Z|\theta_{t},X)\).
2. Sample \(\theta_{t+1}\) from \(p(\theta|Z_{t+1},X)\).
From the properties of the Gibbs sampler, we know that the sequence of \((\theta_{t},Z_{t})\) forms a Markov chain that samples \(p(\theta,Z|X)\). Although Gibbs sampling requires sampling from the conditional distribution, the inner step can be replaced by MH sampling, leading to the Metropolis-within-Gibbs method as discussed in . This provides a completely general scheme for handling missing data. Finally, the DA algorithm is not limited to just missing variables of the data, but can also be applied to unknown parameters of the model, e.g., \(\alpha\) in \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(,\|X) p(X\|,)p()p() p(,\|X) p(X\|,)p(\|)p(). Such dependencies are common in Bayesian hierarchical modeling. In general, the Bayesian hierarchical modeling provides a framework for handling marginalization in Bayesian data analysis, i.e., handling parameters or variables that are either unknown or missing but are necessary to model the data.
## Handling uncertainties in observed data
Marginalization is not limited to handling missing data. It can also be used to handle data \(X=\{x_i| i=1...,N\}\) with uncertainty \(\sigma_X=\{\sigma_{x,i}| i=1...,N\}\). Consider \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\|X,\_X) & & p() \_i p(x\|)p(x_i\|x,\_x,i) dx [\[equ:pthetax1\]]{#equ:pthetax1 label="equ:pthetax1"}\
p(,X\^t\|X,\_X) & & p()\_i p(x\_i\^t\|)p(x\_i\|x_i\^t,\_x,i), [\[equ:pthetax2\]]{#equ:pthetax2 label="equ:pthetax2"} where \(X_t=\{x_{i}^t|i=1...,N\}\) is the true values of the observed data \(X\). Here again, instead of doing an integration, one treats the true values as unknowns and sample them using the Gibbs scheme. We demonstrate this with a simple example where \(p(x_i^t|\theta) \sim \mathcal{N}(x_i^t|\mu,\sigma^2)\) is the model that generates the data, and \(\theta=(\mu,\sigma)\) are the unknowns which we wish to evaluate. The data has uncertainty described by another Gaussian function \(p(x_i|x_i^t,\sigma_{x,i}) \sim \mathcal{N}(x_i|x_i^t,\sigma_{x,i}^2)\). For this simple case, the integral in leads to an analytical expression \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\|X,\_X) p() \_i (x_i\|,\_tot,i\^2), [where]{.roman} \_tot,i=. [\[equ:pthetax3\]]{#equ:pthetax3 label="equ:pthetax3"} We used \((\mu,\sigma)=(0.0,1.0)\) and \(\sigma_x=0.5\) to generate test data and then estimated \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\) using two schemes: (1) DA algorithm which uses and treats \(X_t\) as unknown and samples from it, and (2) explicit integration scheme which uses where the variable \(x_i^t\) has been integrated out of the equation. The Markov chain was run for 100,000 iterations. \(a,b\) shows the pdf of the estimates of the two parameters. Both schemes give identical results. The autocorrelation function for the two parameters are shown in \(c,d\). The DA algorithm has a slightly higher autocorrelation time \(\tau\) as it has to sample an extra parameter for each data point.
# Case studies in astronomy {#sec:casestudy}
In this section, we study a range of cases in astronomy where MCMC based Bayesian analysis is making a significant impact. The emphasis is on showing how to set up a diverse range of problems within the Bayesian framework and how to solve them using MCMC techniques. The examples are intentionally chosen from different areas of astronomy so as to demonstrate the ubiquity of the techniques reviewed here. There is a long history of applying such techniques in the field of cosmology, and excellent reviews and books already exist here:.
## Exoplanets and binary systems using radial velocity measurements
The presence of a planet or a companion star results in temporal variations in the radial velocity of the host star. By analyzing the radial velocity data, one can draw inferences about the ratio of masses between the host and the companion, and orbital parameters like the period and eccentricity. We now describe how to set up the above inference problem in a Bayesian framework. We begin by describing the predictive model for the radial velocity of a star in a binary system. The radial velocity of a star of mass \(M\) in a binary system with companion of mass \(m\) in an orbit with time period \(T\), inclination \(I\) and eccentricity \(e\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] v(t)=+v\_0, =. [\[equ:radial_vel\]]{#equ:radial_vel label="equ:radial_vel"} The true anomaly \(f\) is a function of time, but depends upon \(e\), \(T\), and \(\tau\) via, \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] (f/2)=(u/2), u-eu=(t-). An example of radial velocity data is shown in which shows the radial velocity for two binary systems (the green and the red line) that differ in \(e\) but have same values for all other parameters \(\kappa,T,\tau,\omega\) and \(v_0\). The figure demonstrates that the radial velocity is sensitive to the eccentricity of the orbit.
The actual radial velocity data will differ from the perfect relationship given in due to observational uncertainty (variance \(\sigma_v^2\)) and intrinsic variability of a star (variance \(S^2\)) and we can model this by a Gaussian function \(\mathcal{N}(.|v,\sigma_v^2+S^2)\). For radial velocity data \(D\) defined as a set of radial velocities \(\{v_1...,v_M\}\) at various times \(\{t_1...,t_M\}\), one can fit and constrain seven parameters, \(\theta=(v_{0}, \kappa, T, e, \tau, \omega, S)\), using the Bayes theorem as shown below \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\|D) p(D\|) p() p() \_i=1\^M (v_i\|v(t_i;),\_v\^2+S\^2). We generated test data using and then, using the above equation, we tried to recover the parameters \(\theta\) (available in the supplied software). The posterior distribution \(p(\theta|D)\) was sampled using MCMC, and the results are shown in . Panel \(a\) shows the test data along with the best fit curve. It also shows the radial velocity for the case with \(e=0\). Panel \(b\) shows the posterior distribution of the parameters \(\kappa, T\) and \(e\). If we have data for a large number of binary systems, we can use it to explore the distribution of orbital parameters. A naive way to do this would be to get a "maximum *a posteriori*" (MAP) estimate of the orbital parameters for each star and then study the population distribution by constructing histograms out of it. Such a scheme will give incorrect estimates of the population distribution as the uncertainty associated with the parameter estimates is ignored. In addition to this, as discussed by, the MAP estimates are in general biased. In the context of radial velocity data, the estimates of \(e\) are biased high. The problem is especially acute if the uncertainty associated with the parameters is large, which is often the case with radial velocity data from barycentric motions. All of these problems can be avoided by setting up the problem of estimation of population distributions as a hierarchical Bayesian model. Let us suppose we have radial velocity data for \(N\) binary star systems, and denote by \(y_i\) the radial velocity data set for the \(i\)-th system. Let \(x_i=(v_{0i}, \kappa_i, T_i, e_i, \tau_i, \omega_i, S_i)\) be the orbital parameters for the \(i\)-th system. Finally, let \(\alpha\) be the set of hyperparameters that govern the population distribution of the parameters \(x\). The problem to determine \(\alpha\) can be set up as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(,{x_i}\|{y_i}) p() p(y_i\|x_i) p(x_i\|) This is a BHM and can be sampled using the Metropolis-within-Gibbs scheme discussed in . The parameters \(x_i\) can be estimated alongside \(\alpha\), and to get the marginal distribution \(p(\alpha|\{y_i\})\), one can simply ignore the computed \(x_i\). However, the above scheme is not well suited to explore a variety of population models, especially if sampling from \(p(y_i|x_i) p(x_i|\alpha)\) is computationally demanding. We now show a computationally efficient scheme by that can in general be applied to BHMs of two levels. The marginal distribution of hyperparameters that we are interested in is given by \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\|{y_i}) p() dx_i p(y_i\|x_i) p(x_i\|) The integral on the right hand side can be estimated using a Monte Carlo integration scheme as follows: \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] dx_i p(y_i\|x_i) p(x_i\|) = dx_i p(y_i\|x_i) p(x_i) = \_k=1\^K , with \(x_{ik}\) sampled from \(p(x_i|y_i) \propto p(y_i|x_i) p(x_i)\), which can be done by an MCMC scheme.
## Data driven approach to estimation of stellar parameters from a spectrum
The spectrum of a star contains information about its properties like temperature, gravity and the abundance of different chemical elements that make up the star. Decoding information about stellar parameters from a stellar spectrum is a problem of great significance for astronomy. With the advent of large spectroscopic stellar surveys having several hundred thousand spectra, the need for fast and accurate methods to analyze the stellar spectra has gained prominence. Let us denote the stellar parameters (e.g., \(T_{\rm eff},\log g,{\rm [Fe/H]},\) and \({\rm [X/Fe]}\)) by label vector \({\bf x}=(x_1...,x_K)\) and the observed spectrum by vector \({\bf y}=\{y_1...,y_L\}\), denoting normalized flux at specific wavelengths indexed by \({\bf \lambda}=(1...,L)\) (see ). The problem is to find \({\bf x}\) given \({\bf y}\), which using the Bayes theorem can be written down as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(**x**\|**y**,) p(**y**\|**x**,)p(**x**). [\[equ:cannon_bayes\]]{#equ:cannon_bayes label="equ:cannon_bayes"} Here \(p({\bf y}|{\bf x},\theta)\) denotes a probabilistic generative model for the data, with \(\theta\) being the parameters of the model. If we denote by \(f_{\lambda}({\bf x},\theta_{\lambda})\) the flux predicted by the model at wavelength \(\lambda\) and by \(s_{\lambda}^2\) the variance or scatter about this relation (assuming Gaussian noise), then the probabilistic generative model for the full spectrum can be written as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(**y**\|**x**,)=\_\^L p(y\_\|**x**,\_,s\_)=\_\^L(y\_\|f\_(**x**,\_),s\_\^2) [\[equ:cannon_genmod\]]{#equ:cannon_genmod label="equ:cannon_genmod"} Traditionally, \(f_{\lambda}({\bf x},\theta_{\lambda})\) is calculated from first principles using a physical theory for the formation of spectral lines in a stellar atmosphere specified by stellar parameters \({\bf x}\). Frequently, \(f_{\lambda}({\bf x},\theta_{\lambda})\) is evaluated on a grid defined on \(x\) and then interpolation is used to get the spectrum for any arbitrary value of \({\bf x}\). The \(f_{\lambda}({\bf x},\theta_{\lambda})\) can also be computed by interpolating over a library of empirical spectra with predefined stellar parameters. A more refined data driven approach to the problem using machine learning techniques was presented in . In this approach, \(f_{\lambda}({\bf x},\theta_{\lambda})\) is approximated by a simple (linear or quadratic) function of label vector \({\bf x}\). Therefore \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] f\_(**x**,\_)=\_+\_i=1\^K \_ix\_i +\_i=1\^K\_j=1\^K \_ijx_ix_j. Let us consider a training set of \(N\) stars with label vectors \(X=\{{\bf x}^1...,{\bf x}^N\}\) and corresponding set of fluxes at wavelength \(\lambda\) by \(Y_{\lambda}=\{y_{\lambda}^1...,y_{\lambda}^N\}\). One can estimate \(\theta_{\lambda}\) by sampling within MCMC such that \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\_,s\_\|X,Y\_) p(Y\_\|X,\_,s\_)p(\_)p(s\_) p(\_)p(s\_)\_i=1\^N p(y\_\^i\|**x**\^i,\_s\_). Having obtained the model parameters \(\theta=\{\theta_1...,\theta_L,s_1...,s_L\}\), one can now estimate stellar parameters \({\bf x}\) of a new star with given spectrum \({\bf y}\) using . This is the basis of *The Cannon* algorithm (Ness et al. 2015) which is already widely used by the stellar community. The ability of the algorithm to model the spectra is demonstrated in which shows the spectra of fours stars along with the best-fit spectra for each of them.
## Solar-like oscillations in stars
Solar-like oscillations, which are excited and damped in the outer convective envelopes of a star, are seen in stars like the Sun and red giants. With the advent of space-based missions like *Kepler* and COROT that provide high quality photometric data over a long time series, it has now becomes feasible to detect solar-like oscillations in tens of thousands of stars. Typically, the power spectrum of a star with solar-like oscillations () shows a regular pattern of modes, characterized by a large frequency separation \(\Delta \nu\). The overall amplitude is modulated by a Gaussian envelope and this is characterized by the frequency of maximum oscillation \(\nu_{\rm max}\). Theory suggests that \(\Delta \nu\) for a given star is related to its density, whereas the \(\nu_{\rm max}\) is related to its surface gravity and temperature. Using the above two relations, the mass and the radius of a star can be constrained. The mass of a red giant is sensitive to its age and this makes asteroseismology very useful for understanding Galactic evolution. For further details on solar type oscillations see review by. Bayesian-MCMC based techniques are increasingly being adopted to extract seismic properties, e.g., \(\Delta \nu\) and \(\nu_{\rm max}\), by analyzing the power spectrum generated from the time series photometry of a star . The probability that an observed power spectrum \(\mathbf{\Gamma}=\{\Gamma_1...,\Gamma_N\}\) at frequencies \(\mathbf{\nu}=\{\nu_1...,\nu_N\}\) is produced by a model spectrum \(\Gamma(\nu;\theta)\) (specified by a set of parameters \(\theta\)), is given by \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\|)=\_i=1\^N (-) as shown by. This forms the basis for the Bayesian treatment of the problem of estimation of parameters \(\theta\) by \(p(\theta|\{\Gamma_i\})=p(\{\Gamma_i\}|\theta)p(\theta)\). The power density is modelled as a sum of super-Lorentzian functions \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] (;)=\_wn+\_k+P\_g() To fit the individual modes, one assumes Lorentzian profiles. Spherical harmonics are used to describe the oscillations; the modes are characterized by three wave numbers, \(n,l\) and \(m\). In , eight main modes are fitted (three \(l=0\) and \(l=2\) and two \(l=1\)), parameterized by the mode lifetime \(\tau\), the central frequency \(\nu_0\), three spacings \(\Delta \nu, \delta\nu_{01}\) and \(\delta\nu_{01}\), and the amplitudes \(A_i,A_j\) and \(A_k\). \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] ()&=&P\_wn+\_i=-1\^1 +\_j=-1\^1\
& & +\_k=-1,1 shows the result of fitting the above model to power spectra of fours stars observed by the *Kepler* mission.
## Extinction mapping and estimation of intrinsic stellar properties
Given the mass \(m\) and initial composition (e.g., metallicity \[M/H\]) of a star, we can use the theory of stellar evolution to predict its state and composition at a later time (age \(\tau\)). However, the intrinsic parameters like mass \(m\), \[M/H\] and \(\tau\) are not directly observable. For most stars we only have photometric information, apparent magnitudes in different photometric bands (for example \(J, Ks, u, g, r\) and \(i\)). The photometry of a star depends upon temperature \(T_{\rm eff}\), gravity \(g\), \[M/H\], distance \(s\) and extinction \(E\) (proportional to the dust density integrated along the line of sight to the location of the star). If we have spectroscopy, then we can get temperature \(T_{\rm eff}\), \(g\) and even composition, but with uncertainties. From asteroseismology, we can get average seismic parameters like \(\Delta \nu\) and \(\nu_{\rm max}\), which are sensitive to the mass, radius and temperature of a star. Given this state of affairs, it is quite common to ask the question that, given a certain set of observables of a star, what are the intrinsic parameters of a star or even some other set of observables. For example, given the photometry of a star, what is the distance, temperature and gravity of a star; or given photometry and distance, what is the temperature and gravity of a star; or given photometry and spectroscopy, what is the distance? And so on. Knowing the intrinsic parameters of a star is also important for understanding the formation and evolution of the Galaxy, for example, the star formation rate, the age-metallicity relation and the distribution of dust in the Galaxy. The problem of estimating intrinsic stellar parameters of a star given some observables can be formulated as follows. Let \({\bf y}=(J,J-Ks,J-H,T_{\rm eff},\log g,[M/H]_{\rm obs},l,b)\) be a set of observables associated with a star and \(\sigma_{\bf y}\) their uncertainties. Let us denote the intrinsic variable of a star that we are interested in by \({\bf x}=([M/H],\tau,m,s,l,b,E)\). To specify prior probabilities on \({\bf x}\) we need a Galactic model, and we denote by \(\theta\) the parameters of such a model. Typically, real catalogs have selection effects, e.g., stars selected to lie in some apparent magnitude and color range, or a set of stars with parallax error less than 10%, or stars with missing information in certain bands. To specify selection effects, we denote the event that a star exists in a catalog by \(S\). From theoretical isochrones we can predict \({\bf y}\) given \({\bf x}\), in other words a function \({\bf y(x)}\) exists. However, we are interested in the inverse problem of estimating \({\bf x}\) given \({\bf y}\). A Bayesian introduction to solving such a problem was given by and in the context of estimating ages. The method was further improved and refined by and in the context of the estimation of distances, with a better treatment of priors and selection effects. From the Bayes theorem we have \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(**x\| y,\_y**,S,) p(S,**y\| x,\_y**) p(**x**\|) p(S\|**y**)p(**y**\|**x,\_y**)p(**x**\|). We now explain each of the terms in detail.
1. \(p({\bf x|y ,\sigma_y},S,\theta)\) is the *posterior* distribution of intrinsic parameters given the observables, the selection function and a Galactic model.
2. \(p(S|{\bf y,x,\sigma_y})\) is the *selection function*. This says given the observables what is probability that a star was observed. Typically this can be expressed as \(p(S|{\bf y})p(S|{\bf x})\). The term \(p(S|{\bf x})\) enters in situations where the value of an observable \(y'\) is not known but constraints on it are. Then \(p(S|{\bf x})=\int p(S|y')p(y'|x)dy'\). For example, a parallax of a star is known to be greater than a certain limit, or the apparent magnitude of a star may be missing in a band because the star is too bright or faint .
3. \(p({\bf y|x,\sigma_y})\) is the *likelihood* of the data given the uncertainty and the intrinsic parameters. This can be described by a Gaussian function \(\mathcal{N}(y|y({\bf x}),\sigma_y^2)\) for each \(y\in {\bf y}\).
4. \(p({\bf x}|\theta)\) is the *prior*. This describes the distribution of mass, metallicity, age and spatial distribution of stars in the Galaxy. More specifically it can be written as \(p(x|\theta)=\sum_k p_k(m) p_k([M/H])p_k(\tau)p_k(r)\), where the sum is over different Galactic components, e.g., thin disc, thick disc, bulge and stellar halo.
We now focus on the problem of estimating distance and extinction. For simplicity, we ignore the selection effects; for an in depth discussion, see . By marginalizing over stellar parameters \(\tau,m\) and \([M/H]\) one obtains \(p(s,E|{\bf y,\sigma_y},\theta)\). If we have \(N\) stars along a line of sight, we can estimate the distance-extinction relationship \(E(s_i;\alpha)\) parameterized by \(\alpha\) as \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\|{**y**},) & & p() \_i=1\^N d E\_i ds_i p(s_i,E_i\|**y**\_i,\^i\_**y**,) p(E_i\|s_i,). The above method is used by , to construct three dimensional maps of interstellar dust reddening using Pan-STARRS 1 and 2MASS photometry (). To estimate \(p(s,E|{\bf y,\sigma_y},\theta)\), do a kernel density estimate over samples generated by MCMC, while present a method based on the Gaussian mixture model. As described in, we can also directly estimate \(\alpha\) and intrinsic parameters \({\bf x}\) of each star along a line of sight by setting up the problem as a BHM and sampling from the following posterior: \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(,{**x}\|{**y**},\_**y**,) & & p() \_i=1\^N p(**y**\_i\|**x**\_i,,\_**y**\^i,) p(**x**\_i\|) p(S\|**y**\_i). The Metropolis-within-Gibbs scheme is used to accomplish this sampling.**
## Kinematic and dynamical modelling of the Milky Way
Understanding the origin and evolution of the Milky Way has received significant boost due to the emergence of large data sets that catalog the properties of stars in the Milky Way [@2011Prama..77...39B; @2012MNRAS.419.2251M; @2013MNRAS.433.1411M; @2013A&ARv..21...61R; @2013NewAR..57...29B; @2016arXiv160207702B1]. Bayesian methods and MCMC based schemes are now playing a prominent role in the analysis and interpretation of such large and complex data sets from, e.g., the GCS survey, the SEGUE survey, the APOGEE survey , and the RAVE survey [@2014ApJ...793...51S; @2014MNRAS.445.3133P; @2015MNRAS.449.3479S]. We focus on the problem of determining the mass distribution, or equivalently the gravitational potential of the Milky Way, using halo stars and disc masers. The observational data of stars in the Milky Way is in heliocentric coordinates and is in the form of angular positions on sky (Galactic longitude \(\ell\) and latitude \(b\)), heliocentric distance (\(s\)), heliocentric line of sight velocity (\(v_{\rm los}\)), and proper motion (tangential motion on the sky, \(\mu_\ell\) and \(\mu_b\)). The velocity of halo stars can be described by a simple Gaussian model of the following form \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(**v**\|\_v,,b,s)=(v_r\|0,\_vr) (v\_r\|0,\_v) (v\_\|v\_rot,\_v) for which \(\theta_v\) is the set of parameters that govern the velocity dispersion profiles \(\sigma_{vr},\sigma_{v\theta}\) and \(\sigma_{v\phi}\). The coordinates \((r, \theta, \phi)\) are in the Galactocentric reference frame. The observed heliocentric coordinates can be converted to Galactocentric coordinates using prior estimates of the location and the motion of the sun. For the stellar halo stars, tangential velocities cannot be accurately determined. The distance also has some uncertainty, \(\sigma_s\). Hence we marginalize over unknown tangential velocities and true distance \(s'\), to obtain \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(v\_los\|\_v,,b,s,\_s) = p(v\_,v_b,v\_los\|\_v,,b,s') p(s'\|s,\_s) d v_d v_b d s' [\[equ:vlos_sh\]]{#equ:vlos_sh label="equ:vlos_sh"} The parameters \(\theta_v\) can now be estimated using the data \(D\) of multiple stars by \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\_v\|D) ( \_i p(v\_los\|\_v,\_i,b_i,s_i,\_s,i)) p(\_v) The marginalization in can be handled in various ways. One can make use of deterministic numerical integration techniques (Gaussian quadrature) or one can achieve marginalization via Monte Carlo schemes making use of importance sampling. For Monte Carlo based integration one can make use of the MCMH algorithm discussed in . Alternatively, one can treat \(v_\ell,v_b\) and \(s\) as unknowns by setting them up as a BHM and estimate them alongside \(\theta\) by making use of the Metropolis-within-Gibbs scheme discussed in . The radial velocity dispersion profile of halo stars computed using blue horizontal branch and red giant stars in the SEGUE survey is shown in . We now proceed to estimating the potential \(\Phi\). Given \(\Phi\), density of halo stars \(\rho\) and anisotropy \(\beta=1-(\sigma_{v \theta}^2+\sigma_{v \phi}^2)/(2 \sigma_{v r}^2)\) as function of distance \(r\) from the Galactic center, one can solve for \(\sigma_{vr}(r)\). Let \(\theta\) be the set of parameters used to define the above profiles. So for given \(\theta\), the model makes a prediction for radial velocity dispersion \(\sigma_{vr}(r_i;\theta)\) at a location \(r_i\). This can be compared with the \(\sigma_{vr}(r_i)\) estimated from the observed data. The probability of model parameters \(\theta\) is then given by \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\|D) p() \_i=1\^M (\_vr(r_i)\|\_vr(r_i;),\_i). The posterior distribution for the virial mass and the concentration parameter of the Milky Way halo using BHB and giant stars is shown in . We now discuss ways to incorporate prior information into the analysis. For example, the angular velocity of the Sun with respect to the Galactic Center \(\omega\) is well constrained to be within \(30.24\pm0.12\: {\rm km\ s}^{-1} {\rm kpc}^{-1}\). The vertical force at \(1.1\) kpc above the Sun, in terms of surface mass density, is given by \(\Sigma_{1.1,\odot}=72\pm6\). Let us denote such constraints by \(p(g_j(\theta)|\theta)\). Additional data sets \(D_k\), constraining a certain subset of parameters can also exist. For example, the tangent point velocities or terminal velocities as a function of Galactic longitude \(v_{\rm term}(\ell)\) help to constrain the shape of the circular velocity curve \(v_{\rm circ}(R)=\sqrt{|Rd\Phi/dR|}\). The additional priors and data all enter as multiplicative factors in the posterior, which is given by \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\|D_1\...,D_K) p() \_k=1\^K p(D_k\|) \_j=1\^Jp(g_j()\|). [\[equ:mass_post\]]{#equ:mass_post label="equ:mass_post"} The halo stars carry little information about the mass distribution close to the center and in the disc of the Milky Way. Galactic masers associated with high mass star forming regions are very good tracers of the Milky Way disc which makes them excellent candidates for studying the potential of the Milky Way. Due to extremely accurate astrometric information using very long baseline interferometry, one has very accurate parallax (\(\varpi\)) and proper motion measurements. When combined with line of sight velocities from Doppler shift of spectral lines, one ends up with full 6D phase space information for these sources. Maser sources, are young and have very little random motion which means their orbits are highly circularized. The distribution of velocities can be described by a simple three dimensional Gaussian function, i.e. \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(v_R,v\_,v\_z\|) = (v\_\|v\_circ(R;)+v\_,M,\_vM) (v\_R\|v\_R,M,\_vM) (v\_z\|v\_z,M,\_vM) [\[equ:maser_vel\]]{#equ:maser_vel label="equ:maser_vel"} Here, \({\bf v}_{\rm M}=(v_{R,{\rm M}},v_{\phi,{\rm M}},v_{z,{\rm M}})\) is any systematic streaming velocity associated with the masers and \(\sigma_{v{\rm M}}\) is the velocity dispersion about the mean motion. Now, we have \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(\_,\_,v\_los\|) &= & d ' p('\|) d\_' p(\_'\|\_) d\_' p(\_'\|\_)\
& & dv\_los' p(v\_los'\|v\_los)p(\_',\_',v\_los'\|,') The last term is evaluated using , by converting from heliocentric coordinates \((\mu_{\alpha}',\mu_{\delta}',v_{\rm los}',\alpha,\delta, \varpi')\) to Galactocentric coordinates \((v_R,v_{\phi},v_{z},R,\phi,z)\). Let \(D_1\) denote the full data of \(N\) stars then \[\begin{aligned}
} \def\ee{\end{aligned}\] p(D_1\|)=\_i=1\^N p(\_,i,\_,i,v\_los,i\|) This when put in gives the posterior distribution of model parameters.
# Concluding remarks
The power of the Bayesian probability theory lies in the fact that it is mathematically simple, being based on just two elementary rules, and yet it is broadly applicable. However, Bayesian calculations can be computationally demanding, and this has acted as a major bottleneck in the past. But with the increase of computational power, we have witnessed a sharp increase in the adoption of Bayesian techniques. More recently, free availability of black-box computer packages to efficiently sample from Bayesian posterior distributions has further accelerated the adoption of Bayesian techniques in astronomy. Robust algorithms are now available to sample multidimensional and complex pdfs. The MH algorithm is still the main workhorse of MCMC methods. Good solutions now exist for the issue of application specific tuning of the proposal distribution in the MH algorithm, e.g., adaptive Metropolis schemes and the affine invariant samplers. The MH algorithm when combined with parallel tempering allows one to sample a wide variety of commonly occurring distributions. Situations, in which the posterior is not analytically tractable, can also now be solved using the Monte Carlo version of the MH algorithm. Bayesian methods also provide a framework for model comparison via the use of Bayesian evidence. However, efficient computing of evidence still remains a challenge. Various alternate criteria for comparing models exist and importantly these can make use of the computed MCMC chain. Bayesian hierarchical models further increase the usefulness of the Bayesian framework. They can solve missing data problems, marginalization over variables, convolution with observational uncertainties and so on. This makes a wide class of complex problems suddenly solvable. We showed that the Metropolis-within-Gibbs scheme is ideally suited for sampling posteriors generated by Bayesian hierarchical models and also provide a software for doing this. Multimodal distributions still pose a problem for most MCMC algorithms. Parallel tempering can overcome them but requires more computational time and a careful choice of ladder. If dimensionality of the space being explored is very high and the distribution is complex, efficient exploration is not easy. Techniques are being developed to solve such problems that make use of derivatives of the posterior distribution, e.g., Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. However, more work is required in this area. Efficient exploration of multi-level hierarchical models will play an increasingly important role in future studies. Communication of Bayesian results is also an area where we anticipate improvements. Traditionally, the estimates are reported by means of confidence intervals. However, there is much more information in the MCMC chain, in particular, the correlation between different variables. Also, there is an increasing need to feed results of one MCMC simulation into another. Such requirements are best addressed by reporting the full pdfs or the thinned samples from it. Other alternatives that are economical in terms storage space are to approximate the pdf by analytical functions or to employ Gaussian mixture models. We also need better tools to visualize the Bayesian-MCMC output, specially for high dimensional and complex hierarchical models. Such tools will allow us to understand as to why a model fails and how we should improve it. There are key topics which we have not addressed here. Non-parametric Bayesian methods are becoming increasingly important, e.g., Gaussian processes and Dirichlet process mixture models. uses this method to estimate the gravitational potential of the Milky Way. Astronomy is no longer a data-starved science. With projects like the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope and the Square Kilometre Array, the quality and quantity of data are going to increase dramatically in the coming years. Better quality and larger quantity of data means that we can expect our data to answer more difficult questions, which in turn means more complex models (e.g. multi-level hierarchies and a higher dimensional parameter space). Given that MCMC is a computationally expensive scheme, there will be an increasing demand for such techniques that can make full use of the vast quantity of data on offer and deliver results in an affordable amount of time. Equivalently, MCMC schemes that make use of computing environments with multiple processor and graphic processor units would also be useful. An MCMC chain is serial by nature and it requires special care to parallelize an MCMC algorithm, e.g., use of an ensemble of chains or parallelizing the posterior computation by splitting up the data. Relaxing the condition of reversibility can lead to MCMC algorithms with faster mixing properties . Finally, the development of approximate methods, both application specific and general, that can reduce the computational cost without significantly compromising the quality of results also hold great promise for analyzing large data sets. Approximate Bayesian computation is one such framework; see for its use in astronomy to study the chemical homogeneity of stars in open clusters. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:03:53', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01629', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01629'} |
# Introduction
The study of roots and level lines of random functions is a central topic in mathematics, at the crossroad between Algebra, Analysis and Probability theory, which has been extensively studied since the mid 20th century. Being at the very definition of algebraic varieties, the investigation of the geometry of nodal sets associated to random algebraic or analytic functions is naturally of primer importance. In the pioneering work, the authors considered the expected number of real zeros of random univariate algebraic polynomials with uniform, Gaussian, and discrete entries. Since then, lots of developments were made to estimate the asymptotic behavior, as their degree goes to infinity, of the real/complex level sets associated to such polynomials, under various assumptions on the law of the random entries, see for example and the references therein. Among the class of random functions, of particular interest are random trigonometric polynomials of the form \(\sum_{k=1}^n a_k \cos (k t)\) or \(\sum_{k=1}^n a_k \cos (k t)+b_k\sin (k t)\), where \((a_k)_{k \geq 1}\) and \((b_k)_{k \ge 1}\) are random coefficients, since the distribution of the zeros of such polynomials occurs in a wide range of problems in science and engineering. The asymptotics of the mean number of real zeros of random trigonometric polynomials with independent standard and centered Gaussian coefficients was first explicited by Dunnage in, where it is shown that this number is asymptotically proportional to the degree \(n\) of the considered polynomial. Since then, the level sets of random trigonometric polynomials have been intensively investigated in various directions. For example, still in the case of independent standard and centered Gaussian entries, the variance and the fluctuations around the mean were studied in the serie of papers. Beyond the purely Gaussian case but still considering independent standard and centered entries, the universality of the asymptotic local/global behavior of the number of real zeros was recently established in.
To the best of our knowledge, the case of dependent Gaussian entries in trigonometric models has only been considered in which focus on the two particular and somehow "extreme" cases of a constant correlation \(\mathbb{E}(a_i a_j)=\rho \in ]0,1[\) and a geometric correlation \(\mathbb{E}(a_i a_j)= \rho^{|i-j|}\). In both cases, it is nonetheless shown that the expected number of real roots lying in \([0,2\pi]\) obeys the same asymptotics \[\label{Meanbehavior} \lim_{n \to +\infty} \frac{\mathbb E\left [N_n([0,2\pi])\right]}{n} = \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}.\] The latter result naturally raises the question of ascertaining the sharp conditions on the correlation function \(\rho\) of the random coefficients ensuring this universal asymptotic behavior. The main result of this article, i.e. Theorem 1 p. 9 below, provides a significant step in that direction by exhibiting mild conditions on the spectral density \(\psi_\rho\) guaranteeing that ([\[Meanbehavior\]](#Meanbehavior){reference-type="ref" reference="Meanbehavior"}) indeed holds. Our proofs exploit the Kac--Rice formula and more specifically the interpretation of its underlying integrand in terms of convolutions with respect to suitable trigonometric kernels. In a spirit close to, that is to say by investigating sign changes of piecewise linear approximations of the underlying random functions, the analoguous question for Kac polynomials (\(P_n(x)= \sum_{k\le n} a_k x^k\)) has been tackled in. Under some assumptions on the spectral density, yet not covering the case of the increments of a fractional Brownian motion, it is shown that \[\lim_{n \to +\infty} \frac{\mathbb E\left [N_n(\mathbb{R})\right]}{\log(n)} = \frac{2}{\pi}.\]
The plan of the article is the following. In the next Section 2, we introduce the considered model of random trigonometric polynomials with dependent coefficients and we explicit the hypotheses made on their correlation function. In Section 3, we introduce a suitable renormalization allowing us to express the covariance of the process and its derivative as convolutions with positive kernels which approximate unity. In the last Section 4, we use the celebrated Kac--Rice formula to express the expected number of real zeros and deduce its asymptotics.
# The model and the hypotheses
We consider here random trigonometric polynomials of the form \[f_n(t):=\sum_{1\le k \le n} a_{k} \cos(kt) + b_{k} \sin(kt), \quad t \in \mathbb R,\] where \((a_{k})_{k\ge 1}\) and \((b_{k})_{k\ge 1}\) are two independent sequences of standard centered Gaussian variables with correlation function \(\rho: \mathbb N \to \mathbb R\), namely \(\mathbb E[a_k a_{\ell} ]= \mathbb E[b_k b_{\ell}] =:\rho(|k-\ell|)\) and \(\mathbb E[a_k b_{\ell} ] =0\), \(\forall k, \ell \in \mathbb N^*.\) We will suppose that the spectral function \(\psi_{\rho}\) \[\psi_{\rho}(x) := \sum_{k \in \mathbb Z} \rho(|k|) e^{i k x}, \quad x \in ]0, 2\pi[,\] exists and satisfies the following hypotheses:
\[\label{eq.hypo} \psi_{\rho} \in \mathbb L^1([0, 2\pi],dx), \quad \psi_{\rho} \; \text{is continuous on} \; ]0, 2\pi[ \;\; \text{and} \;\; \gamma_{\rho}:=\inf_{t \in [0, 2\pi]} \psi_{\rho}(t) >0.\]
By Riemann--Lebesgue Lemma, the above integrability condition ensures that the correlation coefficient \(\rho(k)\) goes to zero as \(k\) goes to infinity, but no condition is required on the speed of the decay, allowing us in particular to consider long-range correlations. For instance, the assumptions [\[eq.hypo\]](#eq.hypo){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq.hypo"} are satisfied by the fractional Gaussian noise with Hurst index \(1/2<H<1\). Indeed, in this case, the correlation function \(\rho_H\) is defined as
\[\rho_H({{}k}) := \frac{1}{2} \left( |1+{{}k}|^{2H} +|1-{{}k}|^{2H}-2|{{}k}|^{2H} \right).\]
Setting \(c_H:=\sin(\pi H) \Gamma(2H+1)\) and as shown for example in Proposition 2.1 and Corollary 2.1 of, , the associated spectral function is then
\[{{}\psi}_{\rho_H}(x) := 2 c_H ( 1-\cos(x) ) \sum_{j \in \mathbb Z}^{+\infty} \frac{1}{(2\pi j +x)^{2H+1}}.\]
This function admits a pole at the origin in accordance with the long-range correlation feature, with \({{} \psi}_{\rho_H}(x) \sim c_H |x|^{1-2H}\), and it admits a global positive minimum at \(\pi\), as illustrated in Figure 1 below, for different values of the Hurst parameter \(H\).
# Normalization and convergence
Let us now introduce the following normalized version \(F_n(t)\) of the process \(f_n(t)\) \[F_n(t):=\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\, f_n(t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \left( \sum_{1\le k \le n} a_{k} \cos(kt) + b_{k} \sin(kt) \right),\] and its derivative \[F_n'(t):= \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \left( \sum_{1\le k \le n}-k a_{k} \sin(kt) + k b_{k} \cos(kt) \right).\] Naturally, the zeros of \(f_n\) and its normalized version \(F_n\) coincide. Moreover, the variance of \(F_n(t)\) and \(F_n'(t)\) have particularly nice expressions in terms of convolutions of the spectral function with non-negative kernels.
Let us now describe the behavior as \(n\) goes to infinity of the covariance between the process \(F_n(t)\) and its derivative \(F_n'(t)\).
# Asymptotics of the expected number of real zeros
Thanks to the estimates for the variance and covariance established in the last section, we can now explicit the asymptotic behavior of the expected number of real roots of our random trigometric polynomial. We first consider the real zeros at a positive distance from the origin. Here \(N_n(K)\) denotes the random number of real zeros of \(F_n\) in a set \(K\) whose volume i.e. Lebesgue measure is denoted by \(\mathrm{vol}(K)\).
The expected number of real zeros in the neighborhood of the origin is handled thanks to the following Lemma.
We can finally combine Lemma [\[lem.bulk\]](#lem.bulk){reference-type="ref" reference="lem.bulk"} and Lemma [\[lem.bord\]](#lem.bord){reference-type="ref" reference="lem.bord"} to deduce the asymptotic behavior of the expected number of real roots on the whole interval \([0, 2\pi]\). | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:04:33', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01654', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01654'} |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
# Introduction
Cognitive radio networks (CRNs) have shown great promise in alleviating the acute shortage of spectrum. In such networks, secondary (unlicensed) users are allowed to share the spectrum of the primary (licensed) users. Underlay CRNs in particular, have been shown to result in great improvement in spectral utilization efficiency. In these networks, the secondary transmitters transmit simultaneously with the primary transmitters in the same frequency band, but with powers carefully constrained to limit interference to the primary receiver below a specified interference temperature limit.
In the recent years, the use of energy harvesting (EH) is being studied to prolong battery life of nodes. Although energy can be harvested from natural sources, it is wireless EH that shows the greatest promise. In particular, the possibility of simultaneous wireless information and power transfer has spurred research interest in this area. Since practical circuits cannot simultaneously harvest energy and perform information processing, time-switching and power-splitting relaying protocols have been proposed. In the former, the relay is first charged by the source for a fraction of the signalling interval prior to two-hop relaying. In the latter, the received signal is split into two parts, with a fraction (referred to as the power-splitting parameter \(\rho\)) being used for energy harvesting, while the rest is used for information processing. It is well known that optimization of this parameter is crucial to maximize throughput.
While the use of EH relays in CRNs is well motivated, analysis of performance of such networks has attracted attention only over the past few years . Two types of EH methodologies have been proposed in the context of CRNs In the first type, energy is harvested from the primary signal [@Janghel2014; @Liu2015; @Bhowmick2016; @Miridakis2016; @Wang2016; @He2016]. Note that use the interweave cognitive radio principles, use the underlay signalling mode, while use overlay principles. In the second type, which is of primary interest in this paper, energy is harvested from the secondary source (this requires secondary EH nodes to be in close proximity to the secondary transmitter). Under these circumstances, even in the non-cognitive context, the importance of considering the direct channel from source to destination in addition to the signal relayed by the EH relay has been recognized by only a few authors. In *all existing literature* on two-hop EH relaying in underlay CRNs, the direct channel from source to destination has been ignored. In underlay cognitive radio, powers used at secondary transmitters is a random quantity. For this reason, the secondary nodes need to be in close proximity to each other to ensure any reasonable quality of service in the secondary links. In underlay signalling with EH relays, the nodes need to be even closer since energy harvested is typically small. Ignoring the direct channel from source to destination is therefore not reasonable in such situations. In this paper, we demonstrate this fact.
The contributions of this paper are as follows:
1. We derive closed-form expressions for the throughput of an incremental relaying scheme in which the destination combines the signal relayed by the EH relay with the direct signal from the source.
2. Using approximated throughput expressions, we derive an expression for the power-splitting parameter that maximizes throughput.
3. We demonstrate that relaying with an EH relay results in larger throughput than direct signalling only when the destination combines the direct and relayed signals.
*Notations*: \(\E_{\C}(\cdot)\) denotes the expectation over the condition/conditions \(\C\). \(\exp(\lambda)\) represents the exponential distribution with parameter \(\lambda\), and \({\cal CN}(0,a)\) denotes the circular normal distribution with mean \(0\) and variance \(a\). \(E_1(\cdot)\) and \(\text{Ei}(\cdot)\) represent the exponential integrals defined in and respectively.
# System Model {#sec:system_model}
We consider a two-hop decode-and-forward (DF) relay network as depicted in Fig. [\[fig:sys_model\]](#fig:sys_model){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:sys_model"}. The primary network consists of the primary transmitter (not depicted in the figure) and the primary receiver P. The secondary network (SN) consists of three nodes-a source (S), a relay (R) and a destination (D). Each node equipped with one antenna. Denote the channel between S and R by \(h_{sr}\sim {\cal CN}(0,\lambda_{sr}^{-1})\), and that between the R and D by \(h_{rd}\sim {\cal CN}(0,\lambda_{rd}^{-1})\). Similarly, denote the channel between S and P by \(g_{sp}\sim {\cal CN}(0,\lambda_{sp}^{-1})\), and that between R and P by \(g_{rp}\sim {\cal CN}(0,\lambda_{rp}^{-1})\). We assume that R is equipped with a super-capacitor, and acts as an EH node with EH factor \(\eta\). The energy harvested in the first phase is used by R to relay the signal to D. As in most literature on underlay CRN, we neglect the primary signal at R and D. This is reasonable because of the large distance between the primary transmitter and the secondary nodes (this assumption has been justified on information theoretic grounds ). All the channels are reversible and quasi-static.
# Transmission Protocol {#sec:transmission_protocol}
We assume fixed-rate transmission at rate \(R_s\) by all nodes. Signalling based on the incremental protocol is completed in two time-slots as depicted in Fig.[\[fig:transmission_schemeInc\]](#fig:transmission_schemeInc){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:transmission_schemeInc"}. Message transmission is based on the incremental relaying protocol, and EH is based on the power-splitting protocol.
In the first transmission time-slot, S transmits information symbols to D and R as depicted in Fig.[\[fig:transmission_schemeInc\]](#fig:transmission_schemeInc){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:transmission_schemeInc"}. R harvests energy from this signal using power splitting, and attempts to decode the information symbols. Meanwhile, D attempts to decode the symbols. If successful, it sends feedback to the source and the relay[^1]. The relay discards the decoded symbols, and the source re-transmits a new block of symbols to D as depicted in Fig.[\[fig:transmission_schemeInc\]](#fig:transmission_schemeInc){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:transmission_schemeInc"}a[^2]. Else, R relays the symbols using the energy harvested, and D combines the signals in the first and the second time-slots as depicted in Fig.[\[fig:transmission_schemeInc\]](#fig:transmission_schemeInc){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:transmission_schemeInc"}b.
In the first time-slot, S transmits a message signal \(x\) with power \(P_s\) in underlay mode to R and D. In PS-EH case, a component \(y_{d_1}\) of the received signal with \(\rho\) fraction of the power is utilized for EH, while the remaining signal with fraction \(1-\rho\) of the power is used to decode the symbols. Clearly, \(y_r\) at R and and \(y_{d_1}\) at D in the first phase are given by:
respectively, where \(n_r,n_{d_1}\sim{\cal CN}\left(0,N_o\right)\) are noise samples at R and D. Clearly, the SNR \(\Gamma_{d_1}\) at D in the first time-slot is \(\frac{P_s|h_{sd}|^2}{N_o}\). Energy harvested at R is \(\eta \rho\,P_s |h_{sr}|^2/2\) (ignoring noise) so that the power available for relaying is given by: \[^hP_{r}=\rho\,\eta P_s |h_{sr}|^2 = \beta\,P_s |h_{sr}|^2\,,\label{eq:Prh-PS}\] where \(\beta= \eta\, \rho\). Let \(I\) denote the interference temperature limit. In order to ensure that the interference caused to primary receiver P is limited to \(I\), the power \(P_s\) at S is chosen to be: \[P_s= {I}/{|g_{sp}|^2}\.\label{eq:PsOnlyInterference}\] We consider only the peak interference constraint at S, and ignore the peak power constraint for the following reason:
1. It is well known that performance of CRNs exhibits an outage floor, and does not improve with increase in peak power (it is in this low outage and high throughput region that CRNs are typically operated) (and references therein). In this paper, we discuss optimization of PS EH parameter, which is of interest in this high throughput regime.
2. Since performance of CRNs is typically limited by interference, and sufficient peak power is typically available, this assumption is quite reasonable.
In the second time-slot, R is used to forward the decoded symbol \(\hat{x}\) to D. In order to ensure that the interference at P is constrained to \(I\), the total transmit power \(P_{r}\) at R is chosen to be: \[P_{r} = \min\left(^hP_{r}, \frac{I}{|g_{rp}|^2} \right). \label{eq:Pr_PS}\] Received signal \(y_{d_2}\) at D can be expressed as \[y_{d_2} = \sqrt{P_{r}}\, \hat{x}\,h_{rd}+n_{d_2}\;, \label{eq:yd2_PS}\] where \(n_{d_2}\sim{\cal CN}\left(0,N_o\right)\) is the additive white Gaussian noise sample. We assume that D uses MRC to combine the signals obtained in the first phase ([\[eq:yd1_PS\]](#eq:yd1_PS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:yd1_PS"}) and second phase ([\[eq:yd2_PS\]](#eq:yd2_PS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:yd2_PS"}). Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at R and D are expressed using ([\[eq:yr_PS\]](#eq:yr_PS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:yr_PS"}), ([\[eq:yd1_PS\]](#eq:yd1_PS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:yd1_PS"}) and ([\[eq:yd2_PS\]](#eq:yd2_PS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:yd2_PS"}) as:
# Performance Analysis {#sec:perfromance}
In this section, we analyze throughput performance of the described incremental relaying protocol. When \(\Gamma_{d_1}\geq\gamma_{th}\), the direct link is successful, so that rate achieved is \(R_s\). When \(\Gamma_{d_1}<\gamma_{th}\), and the relay can decode successfully (\(\Gamma_r\geq\gamma_{th}\)), and the SNR at the destination after combining is sufficient (\(\Gamma_d=\Gamma_{d_1}+\Gamma_{d_2}\geq \gamma_{th}\)), signalling is completed in two hops (rate \(R_s/2\)). Clearly, throughput \(\tau\) is given by:
where \(\gamma_{th}=2^{R_s}-1\). We note that \(q_1\), the probability that the relayed link is successful while the direct link is not successful, can alternatively be represented as:
We evaluate each of the terms in what follows. From [\[eq:SNR_rps\]](#eq:SNR_rps){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:SNR_rps"}, \(p_1\) can be evaluated as: \[\begin{aligned}
p_1=\Pr\left(\Gamma_r< \gamma_{th}\right) = \Pr\left(\frac{(1-\rho) P_s|h_{sr}|^2}{N_o}< \gamma_{th}\right). \label{eq:p1} \end{aligned}\] Using \(P_s=I/|g_{sp}|^{2}\), it can be shown that: \[p_1=1-\frac{1}{1+{\lambda_{sr}\psi}/({\lambda_{sp}(1-\rho)})},\label{eq:p1Final}\] where \(\psi=\frac{\gamma_{th}}{I/N_o}\). Similarly, \(q_2\) is given by: \[\begin{aligned}
q_2=\Pr(\Gamma_{d_1}\geq\gamma_{th})=\frac{1}{1+{\lambda_{sd} \psi}/{\lambda_{sp}}}.\label{eq:q2} \end{aligned}\] We note that \(\Gamma_r\) and \(\Gamma_{d_1}\) are not independent due to their dependence on the random variable \(P_s=I/|g_{sp}|^{2}\). By first conditioning on \(|g_{sp}|^{2}\), exploiting the independence of \(\Gamma_{r\big||g_{sp}|^2}\) and \(\Gamma_{d\big||g_{sp}|^{2}}\), and then averaging over \(|g_{sp}|^{2}\), we can show that \(p_2\) can be written as:
After integrating over \(|h_{sr}|^2\) and \(|h_{sd}|^2\), \(p_2\) can be expressed in terms of \(|g_{sp}|^{2}\) as: \[p_2=\int_{0}^{\infty} \lambda_{sp} e^{\lambda_{sp}|g_{sp}|^2} e^{-\lambda_{sd}\psi |g_{sp}|^2-\frac{\lambda_{sr} \psi |g_{sp}|^2}{(1-\rho)}}d |g_{sp}|^2. \nonumber\] Now after averaging over \(|g_{sp}|^2\), the resultant expression can be found out to be: \[\begin{aligned}
p_2=\frac{1}{1+ \frac{\psi}{\lambda_{sp}}\left(\lambda_{sd}+\frac{\lambda_{sr}}{(1-\rho)}\right)}.\label{eq:p2Final} \end{aligned}\] An approximate closed-form expression for \(p_3\) is derived in Appendix-A. The final expression is presented in [\[eq:p3_Final\]](#eq:p3_Final){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p3_Final"}. Resultant expression of \(\tau\) can be found out by substituting for \(p_1\), \(p_2\), \(p_3\) and \(q_2\) into [\[eq:tauIn\]](#eq:tauIn){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:tauIn"}.\
## Value of EH-factor for optimal throughput
Throughput \(\tau\) is small for \(\rho=0\) (no energy harvested at the relay) and \(\rho=1\) (no decoding is possible at the relay). In both these cases, the relayed signal is not available. When \(0<\rho<1\), the throughput is larger since the relayed signal is not always in outage. It is clear that the following optimal value of EH parameter (\(\rho^{*}\)) that maximizes throughput is of interest: \[\begin{aligned}
\rho^* = \arg\displaystyle\max_{\rho} \quad \tau \label{eq:rhoOptimum}. \end{aligned}\] It is difficult to find an exact solution for \(\rho^*\) since the lengthy expression for \(\tau\) contains several nonlinear functions.
To obtain an expression for \(\tau\) in a simplified form (say \(\tau_{sim}\)), we use the high-SNR approximation \(\left({I\lambda_{sp}}/{N_o}\gg\gamma_{th}\right)\) and also neglect the R-P link[^3]. We show through simulations in Fig. [\[fig:TauVsRho\]](#fig:TauVsRho){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:TauVsRho"} of Section [5](#sec:simulations){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:simulations"} that throughput of a practical system that imposes the peak interference constraint at the relay is indistinguishable from one that neglects it. In other words, SN performance does not depend (or at best very loosely depends) on the statistical parameter (\(\lambda_{rp}\)) of the R-P channel for most practical range of parameters. Intuitively, this is because of the fact that the harvested energy is very small (less than \(I/|g_{rp}|^2\)) with very high probability.
From the above discussion, throughput can be represented in most simplified form as given in [\[eq:TauSimplified\]](#eq:TauSimplified){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:TauSimplified"} (please refer the Appendix-B for derivation). We omit proof of concavity due to space constraints. Solving \(\frac{d\tau_{sim}}{d\rho}=0\). results in a quadratic equation which has two roots, out of which the one between \(0\) to \(1\) is given by[^4]: \[\rho^* \approx \frac{1-\sqrt{\left(1+\frac{\lambda_{sp}}{\lambda_{sd}\psi}\right)}\frac{ \psi \lambda_{sr}\,}{ \lambda_{sp}}}{1+\sqrt{\left(1+\frac{\lambda_{sp}}{\lambda_{sd}\psi}\right)}\frac{ \eta}{\lambda_{rd}}}.\label{eq:OptRho}\]
As a special case, value of \(\rho\) which maximizes the throughput if the S-D link ignored [^5] (i.e \(\lambda_{sd}\rightarrow\infty\)) becomes: \[\begin{aligned}
\rho^*_{nd} \approx \lim\limits_{d_{sd}\rightarrow\infty} \rho^* = \frac{1-\frac{ \psi \lambda_{sr} \,}{ \lambda_{sp}}}{1+\frac{ \eta}{\lambda_{rd}}},\label{eq:OptRhoWSD} \end{aligned}\] where subscript \(nd\) is used to emphasize the fact that no direct path is present. In this case, the throughput is derived from [\[eq:tauIn\]](#eq:tauIn){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:tauIn"} by using \(\lambda_{sd}\rightarrow\infty\), and given by: \[\begin{aligned}
\tau_{nd} = \lim\limits_{\lambda_{sd}\rightarrow\infty} \, \tau.\label{eq:TauWSD} \end{aligned}\]
# Simulation Results {#sec:simulations}
In this section, we validate the derived expressions by computer simulations. The normalized S-R, R-D, and S-D distances are assumed to be \(1.2\), \(1.8\) and \(3\) respectively. The normalized S-P and R-P distances are assumed to be \(3\). Path loss exponent \(\epsilon\) is assumed to be \(4\). We assume \(\eta = 0.7\) and \(I/N_o=6\) dB unless stated otherwise.
The importance of optimizing \(\rho\) for maximizing throughput is clearly brought out in Fig.[\[fig:TauVsRho\]](#fig:TauVsRho){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:TauVsRho"} (concavity is clear from the plots). The graph depicts a plot of \(\tau\) versus \(\rho\) for \(R_s=3\) bpcu for different \(d_{sr}\).
The value of \(\rho^*\) indicated by [\[eq:OptRho\]](#eq:OptRho){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:OptRho"} for \(d_{sr}\) of \(1.2\), and \(1.7\) are \(0.87\) and \(0.62\) respectively, which are in close agreement with simulations. Similarly, in the absence of the direct link, \(\rho^*_{nd}\) of \(0.89\) and \(0.68\) are indicated by ([\[eq:OptRhoWSD\]](#eq:OptRhoWSD){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:OptRhoWSD"}), which are in close agreement with simulations. We note that \(\rho^*_{nd}>\rho^*\), as can be intuitively expected. It is clear that a) incremental relaying results in higher throughput than relay-less signalling from S to D, b) two-hop relaying that ignores the S-D link results in throughput that is quite poor as compared to direct S-D signalling without the relay, and c) a smaller \(d_{sr}\) results in larger throughput, especially for large \(\rho\) (note that \(d_{sr}+d_{rd}=d_{sd}\) so that a smaller \(d_{sr}\) implies a larger \(d_{rd}\)).
In Fig.[\[fig:TauVsRsConf\]](#fig:TauVsRsConf){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:TauVsRsConf"}, throughput is plotted versus \(R_s\) for two different values of \(I\). For each point, the optimum value of \(\rho^{*}\) is computed and used. The superiority of incremental relaying over direct point-to-point transmission is apparent. Moreover, the gap between the two is higher for larger value of \(I\). This happens because relayed signalling has a higher chance of non-outage for larger value of \(I\). It be observed that an optimum value of \(R_s\) exists which maximizes throughput. It is apparent from [\[eq:tauIn\]](#eq:tauIn){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:tauIn"}, that throughput is limited by \(R_s\) when it is small, and by outage when \(R_s\) is large. The optimum value needs to be obtained by numerical search.
# Conclusion {#sec:conclusion}
In this paper, we derived a closed-form expression for the throughput performance of an underlay two-hop network with a power-splitting based energy harvesting relay. We present a closed-form expression for the throughput maximizing power-splitting parameter.
# Appendix {#appendix .unnumbered}
## Derivation of \(p_3\) {#eq:p3Derivation}
In this Appendix, we derive an expression for \(p_3\). To this end, we first define \(X\) as: \[\begin{aligned}
X\triangleq \min\left(^hP, \frac{I}{|g_{rp}|^2}\right)|h_{rd}|^2 \label{eq:X} \end{aligned}\] Its Cumulative distribution function (CDF) conditioned on \(^hP\) can be derived as: \[\hspace{-0.04in}F_{X\big|_{^hP}}\hspace*{-0.3cm}(x)=1-e^{\frac{\lambda_{rd}x}{\beta\,P_s\,|h_{sr}|^2}}\Big(1-e^{-\frac{\lambda_{rp}I}{\beta\,P_s\,|h_{sr}|^2}}\Big(\frac{\frac{\lambda_{rd} x}{I\lambda_{rp}}}{1+\frac{\lambda_{rd}x}{I\lambda_{rp}}}\Big)\Big)\label{eq:CDFofX}\] From [\[eq:q\]](#eq:q){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:q"}, \(p_3\) can be expressed as:
We derive \(p_3\) by successive averaging over each random variable and keeping other r.vs. in terms of condition. We first average w.r.t. \(X\) by using [\[eq:CDFofX\]](#eq:CDFofX){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:CDFofX"} to get:
where the condition \(\C_1=\{\frac{(1-\rho) P_s |h_{sr}|^2}{N_o}>\gamma_{th},\, \frac{P_s |h_{sd}|^2}{N_o}\leq\gamma_{th}\}\). Unfortunately, averaging the above with respect to random variables \(|h_{sr}|^2\) and \(|g_{sp}|^2\) results in intractable expressions. We need to make use of the following fact: \(1\gg\frac{\lambda_{rd}}{I\lambda_{rp}}\left(\gamma_{th}N_o-P_s |h_{sd}|^2\right)\) (since \(P_s |h_{sd}|^2/N_o <\gamma_{th}\) and \(I\lambda_{rp}\gg\lambda_{rd}\)). Hence for tractability, \(\frac{\lambda_{rd}}{I\lambda_{rp}}\left(\gamma_{th}N_o-P_s |h_{sd}|^2\right)\) can be replaced by its mean i.e. \(\frac{\lambda_{rd}}{I\lambda_{rp}}\left(\gamma_{th}N_o-\E_{P_s|h_{sd}|^2\leq \gamma_{th}}(P_s |h_{sd}|^2)\right)\). \(\E_{P_s|h_{sd}|^2\leq \gamma_{th}}(P_s |h_{sd}|^2)\) can be derived as: \[\E_{\C_2}(P_s |h_{sd}|^2)=\frac{I \lambda_{sp}}{\lambda_{sd}} \Big(\log \Big(\frac{\gamma_{th} \lambda_{sd} N_o}{I \lambda_{sp}}+1\Big)+\frac{\frac{\gamma_{th} \lambda_{sd} N_o}{I \lambda_{sp}}}{\frac{\gamma_{th} \lambda_{sd} N_o}{I \lambda_{sp}}+1}\Big),\label{eq:EC2}\] where \(\C_2=\{P_s|h_{sd}|^2\leq N_o \gamma_{th}\}\). Now, \(p_3\) can further represented in approximated form as:
where \(t=1-1/({1+\frac{\lambda_{rd}}{I\lambda_{rp}}\left(\gamma_{th} N_o-\E_{\C_2}\left[P_s|h_{sd}|^2\right]\right)})\). The above approximation is tight for \(\lambda_{rd}<<I\lambda_{rp}\). This is true for general system settings in underlay-CRN.
Now averaging the above expression over \(|h_{sr}|^{2}\) and using the expression for \(P_s\) in [\[eq:PsOnlyInterference\]](#eq:PsOnlyInterference){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:PsOnlyInterference"}, results in the following expression for \(p_3\):
where condition \(\C_3=\{\frac{(1-\rho) |h_{sr}|^2}{\psi}>|g_{sp}|^2\}\). Now let \(\psi = \frac{\gamma_{th}}{I/N_o}\), \(p_3\) becomes:
Now averaging the above equation over \(|g_{sp}|^2\) and then using some straightforward manipulations, the resultant expression is presented in [\[eq:p3_hsr\]](#eq:p3_hsr){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p3_hsr"}. From [\[eq:p3_hsr\]](#eq:p3_hsr){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p3_hsr"}, \(p_3\) is now expressed as: \[p_3 = \int_{0}^{\infty} p_3\big|_{|h_{sr}|^2} \lambda_{sr} e^{-\lambda_{sr} |h_{sr}|^2} d|h_{sr}|^2\] The above integral can be simplified using the integral presented in:
We omit the manipulations due to space limitations and present the approximated \(p_3\) as in [\[eq:p3_Final\]](#eq:p3_Final){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p3_Final"} (top of page-4).
## Derivation of \(\tau_{sim}\) {#AppB:ApproxP3}
In the expression for \(p_3\) in [\[eq:p3_Final\]](#eq:p3_Final){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p3_Final"}, \(t=1-1/({1+\frac{\lambda_{rd}}{I\lambda_{rp}}\left(\gamma_{th} N_o-\E_{\C_2}\left[P_s|h_{sd}|^2\right]\right)})\) as defined in [\[eq:p3hSR\]](#eq:p3hSR){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p3hSR"}, with \(\E_{\C_2}\left[P_s|h_{sd}|^2\right]\) given by [\[eq:EC2\]](#eq:EC2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:EC2"}. Clearly, \(t=0\) when \(\lambda_{rp}\rightarrow\infty\), which enables us to simplify \(p_3\). Resultant expression is given in [\[eq:p3_WithoutLRP\]](#eq:p3_WithoutLRP){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p3_WithoutLRP"} (second equation on the top of the next page).
Further simplification is possible when \(\frac{I\lambda_{sp}}{N_o}\gg\gamma_{th}\), which is the commonly encountered situation. In this case, the arguments of \(e^{-x}\text{Ei}(x)\) and \(e^{x} E_1(x)\) terms in \(p_3\) increase and decrease respectively. Using the fact that \(e^{-x}\text{Ei}(x)\rightarrow 0\) for \(x\rightarrow\infty\) (here \(x\propto\frac{\lambda_{sp}}{\psi}\)), the term associated with \(\text{Ei}(x)\) vanishes from the expression for \(p_3\). We further use the fact that \(E_1(x)\gg E_1((x+A))\), for \(A>0\) when \(A\) is very large (as it is in this case since \((1-\rho) I\lambda_{sp}/(\gamma_{th} N_o)>0\)). The term with \(e^x E_1((x+A))\) can be neglected in the high SNR region. From [\[eq:p3_WithoutLRP\]](#eq:p3_WithoutLRP){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p3_WithoutLRP"}, the resultant approximated expression can be written as: \[\begin{aligned}
p^{d_{rp}\rightarrow\infty}_{3}\overset{A\gg0}{\approx}&\left(\frac{\psi \lambda_{rd} }{\beta \lambda_{sp}}\right)^2\frac{(\lambda_{sp} \lambda_{sr} )}{\frac{\psi \lambda_{rd} }{\beta}+\frac{\lambda_{rd} \lambda_{sp}}{\beta \lambda_{sd}}}e^{\frac{\psi \lambda_{rd} \lambda_{sr} }{\beta \lambda_{sp}}} E_1\left(\frac{\psi \lambda_{rd} \lambda_{sr} }{\beta \lambda_{sp}}\right)\nonumber\\ &+\frac{\lambda_{sr} }{\frac{\lambda_{sp} (1-\rho)}{\psi }+\lambda_{sr} } \left( e^{-\frac{ \lambda_{rd} (1-\rho)}{\beta}}-1\right). \label{eq:p3_HSNR} \end{aligned}\] By using the following very tight lower and upper bounds \(e^{x}E_1(x)\geq ({1+x})^{-1}\) and \(e^{-{\lambda_{rd} (1-\rho)}/{\rho}}\leq({1+{\lambda_{rd} (1-\rho)}/{\rho}})^{-1}\) respectively into [\[eq:p3_HSNR\]](#eq:p3_HSNR){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p3_HSNR"}, and from [\[eq:p1Final\]](#eq:p1Final){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p1Final"}, [\[eq:p2Final\]](#eq:p2Final){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:p2Final"} and [\[eq:q2\]](#eq:q2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:q2"}, \(\tau\) can be approximated as \(\tau_{sim}\) in [\[eq:TauApproxApp1\]](#eq:TauApproxApp1){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:TauApproxApp1"}.
It is worth noting that the above approximation is valid for \(\frac{I\lambda_{sp}}{N_o}\gg\gamma_{th}\). However, it continues to follow the throughput \(\tau\) in other cases. To get a closed form expression, we further approximate the above by utilizing the fact \(\frac{\lambda_{rd}}{\eta\rho}\gg 1-\frac{\lambda_{rd}}{\eta}\) (since \(\eta, \rho\leq 1\)) and \(\frac{I \lambda_{sp} (1-\rho)}{\gamma_{th} N_o\lambda_{sr}}\gg1\) except when \(\rho\approx1\) and represented in [\[eq:TauSimplified\]](#eq:TauSimplified){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:TauSimplified"} (top of the page-4). Please note that \(\rho\approx1\) is unlikely, since it results in outage of the relayed link.
[^1]: We assume that feedback time is extremely small and can be neglected in the analysis without loss of generality.
[^2]: The relay does not harvest energy in this phase. Energy stored in the super-capacitor is assumed to be lost since it lacks the ability to store charge over long intervals.
[^3]: We note that the R-P link is ignored only for the simplified analysis to obtain insights into the optimum power-splitting parameter. The relay needs to apply power control as in any other underlay system. We note that all computer simulations are performed with the interference channel from relay to primary receiver.
[^4]: Since \(\lambda_{sr}\ll\lambda_{sd}\), it can be shown that \(\rhoˆ{*}\in [0,1]\).
[^5]: In this case, there is no involvement of direct path and a case of two-hop transmission between nodes S to D via R. | {'timestamp': '2017-09-04T02:05:16', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01734', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01734'} |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
# **Introduction**
Some well known random fixed point theorems are stochastic generalizations of Banach's fixed point theorem and Banach's type fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces. In 1955, Spacek and Hans initiated to prove random fixed point theorems for random contraction mappings in separable complete metric spaces. In 1966, Mukherjee proved a random fixed point theorem in the sense of Schaduer's fixed point theorem in atomic probability measure spaces. Especially, in 1976, the work of Bharucha-Reid has been developed by various mathematicians. In 1979, Itoh extended some random fixed point theorems of Spacek and Hans to the setting of multi-valued contraction mappings and applied random fixed point theorems to solve some random differential equations in Banach spaces. In 1984, Sehgal and Waters proved some random fixed point theorems including classical results given by Rothe. Recently, Beg and Shahzad showed the existence of random common fixed points and random coincidence points of a pair of compatible random multi-valued mappings in Polish spaces. Especially, Kumam et al. proved many random fixed point theorems for multi-valued nonexpansive nonself-mappings satisfying the inwardness condition in Banach spaces (see ). Jung et al. proved random fixed point theorems for a certain class of mappings in banach spaces. Cho et al. proved random Ishikawa iterative sequence with errors for approximating random fixed points. Likewise, Kumam and Plubtieng showed the existence of a random coincidence point for a pair of reciprocally continuous and compatible single-valued and multi-valued mappings and Saha, Saha and Debnath established some random fixed point theorems in separable Hilbert spaces and separable Banach spaces, respectively. On the other hand, Padgett, Achari, Saha and Dey applied some random fixed point theorems to show the existence of solutions of random nonlinear integral equations in Banach spaces. Recently, Saha and Ganguly proved some random fixed point theorems for a class of contractive mappings in separable Banach spaces equipped with a complete probability measure. In fact, Banach's contraction principle () is very important to show the existence of solutions of some nonlinear equations, differential and integral equations, and other nonlinear problems. Since Banach's contraction principle, many authors have studied in several ways.
Note that the mapping \(T\) satisfying the Banach contraction condition is continuous, but the mappings \(T\) satisfying the following contractions conditions are not continuous. (1) In 1968, Kannan's contraction (): for some \(\beta \in [0, \frac{1}{2})\), \[\begin{aligned}
\label{IntroHardyRogerscontraction002} d(Tx, Ty) \leq \beta [d(x, Tx) + d(y, Ty)] \end{aligned}\] for each \(x, y \in X\); (2) In 1971, Reich's contraction (): for some \(\alpha, \beta, \gamma \geq 0\) with \(\alpha + \beta + \gamma < 1\), \[\begin{aligned}
\label{IntroHardyRogerscontraction003} d(Tx, Ty) \leq \alpha d(x, Tx) + \beta d(y, Ty) + \gamma d(y, Ty) \end{aligned}\] for each \(x, y \in X\); (3) In 1971, \(\acute{\text{C}}\)iri\(\acute{\text{c}}\)'s contraction (): for some \(\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta \geq 0\) with \(\alpha + \beta + \gamma + 2\delta < 1\), \[\begin{aligned}
\label{IntroHardyRogerscontraction004} d(Tx, Ty) \leq \alpha d(x, y) + \beta d(x, Tx) + \gamma d(y, Ty) + \delta [d(x, Ty) + d(y, Tx)] \end{aligned}\] for each \(x, y \in X\); (4) In 1972, Chatterjea's contraction (): for some \(\beta \in [0, \frac{1}{2})\), \[\begin{aligned}
\label{IntroHardyRogerscontraction005} d(Tx, Ty) \leq \beta [d(x, Ty) + d(y, Tx)] \end{aligned}\] for each \(x, y \in X\); (5) In 1972, Zamfirescu contractive conditions (): there exist real numbers \(\alpha, \beta, \gamma, 0 \leq \alpha < 1, 0 \leq \beta < 1, \gamma < \frac{1}{2}\), such that, for each \(x, y \in X\), at least one of the following is true:
1. \(d(Tx, Ty) \leq \alpha d(x, y)\);
2. \(d(Tx, Ty) \leq \beta [d(x, Tx) + d(y, Ty)]\);
3. \(d(Tx, Ty) \leq \gamma [d(x, Ty) + d(y, Tx)]\).
For each \(x, y \in X, x \neq y\), \[\begin{aligned}
\label{IntroHardyRogerscontraction005b} d(Tx, Ty) < \max \{ d(x, y), [d(x, Tx) + d(y, Ty)]/2, [d(x, Ty) + d(y, Tx)]/2 \}. \end{aligned}\] (6) In 1973, Hardy and Rogers's contraction (): for some \(\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta, \eta \geq 0\) with \(\alpha + \beta + \gamma + \delta + \eta < 1\), \[\begin{aligned}
\label{IntroHardyRogerscontraction006} d(Tx, Ty) \leq \alpha d(x, y) + \beta d(x, Tx) + \gamma d(y, Ty) + \delta d(x, Ty) + \eta d(y, Tx) \end{aligned}\] for each \(x, y \in X\): In 2000, \(\acute{\text{C}}\)iri\(\acute{\text{c}}\) dealt with a class of mappings (not necessarily continuous) satisfying Gregus type contraction in metric spaces () and proved the following fixed point theorem:
Moreover, Common fixed points under contractive conditions in cone metric spaces was studied by Radenovi\(\acute{\text{c}}\) (see in ). Recently, Saha and Ganguly proved some random fixed point theorems for a certain class of contractive mappings in a separable Banach space equipped with a complete probability measure as follows:
Note that, if \(\beta = 0\) or \(\gamma = 0\) and \(\delta = \eta\), then fixed point theorems for Hardy and Roger's contraction [\[IntroHardyRogerscontraction006\]](#IntroHardyRogerscontraction006){reference-type="eqref" reference="IntroHardyRogerscontraction006"} reduced to fixed point theorems for Gregus type contraction [\[IntroHardyRogerscontraction007\]](#IntroHardyRogerscontraction007){reference-type="eqref" reference="IntroHardyRogerscontraction007"}. The purpose of this paper is to prove some random fixed point theorems for random Hardy-Rogers self-mappings in separable Banach spaces and, by using our main results, we show the existence of solutions of random nonlinear integral equations.
# **Preliminaries**
Throughout this paper, X will denote a separable Banach over the real. Let \(\beta_X\) be a \(\sigma\)-algebra of Borel subsets of \(X\). Let \((\Omega, \beta, \mu)\) denote a complete probability measure space with the measure \(\mu\) and \(\beta\) be a \(\sigma\)-algebra of subsets of \(\Omega\). For more details, see Joshi and Bose.
In a separable Banach space \(X\), the notions of strong and weak random variables \(x: \Omega \rightarrow X\) () coincide and, in \(X\), \(x\) is termed as a random variable. Now, we recall the following:
Let \(Y\) be an another Banach space. We also need the following definitions (see Joshi and Bose ).
Also, we recall the following definitions (see Joshi and Bose ):
is called a *random solution* of the fixed point equation or a random fixed point of \(F\).
# **The main results**
Motivated and inspired by Theorem [\[MainMotivate\]](#MainMotivate){reference-type="ref" reference="MainMotivate"}, we proposed the definition as follows:
Now, for all \(s_1, s_2 \in S\), we have \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction002} && \|T(\omega, s_1(\omega))-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\|\nonumber\\ &\leq& \alpha_1(\omega) \|s_1(\omega)-s_2(\omega)\| + \alpha_2(\omega) \|s_1(\omega)-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_3(\omega) \|s_2(\omega)-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| + \alpha_4(\omega) \|s_1(\omega)-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_5(\omega) \|s_2(\omega)-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\|. \end{aligned}\] Since \(S\) is dense in \(X\), for any \(\delta_i(x_i) > 0\), there exist \(s_1, s_2 \in S\) such that \(\|x_i-s_i\| < \delta_i(x_i)\) for each \(i = 1, 2\). Note that, for any \(x_1, x_2 \in X\), \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction003} \|s_1(\omega)-s_2(\omega)\| \leq \|s_1(\omega)-x_1(\omega)\| + \|x_1(\omega)-x_2(\omega)\| + \|x_2(\omega)-s_2(\omega)\|, \end{aligned}\] \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction004} \|s_1(\omega)-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\| &\leq& \|s_1(\omega)-x_1(\omega)\| + \|x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, x_1(\omega)\| \\ \nonumber && + \|T(\omega, x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, s_1(\omega)\|, \end{aligned}\] \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction005} \|s_2(\omega)-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| &\leq& \|s_2(\omega)-x_2(\omega)\| + \|x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, x_2(\omega)\| \\ \nonumber && + \|T(\omega, x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, s_2(\omega)\|, \end{aligned}\] \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction006} \|s_1(\omega)-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| &\leq& \|s_1(\omega)-x_1(\omega)\| + \|x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, x_2(\omega)\| \\ \nonumber && + \|T(\omega, x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, s_2(\omega)\| \end{aligned}\] and \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction007} \|s_2(\omega)-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\| &\leq& \|s_2(\omega)-x_2(\omega)\| + \|x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, x_1(\omega)\| \\ \nonumber && + \|T(\omega, x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, s_1(\omega)\|. \end{aligned}\] Suppose that \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction008} && \|T(\omega, s_1(\omega))-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\|\nonumber\\ &\leq& \alpha_1(\omega) \|s_1(\omega)-s_2(\omega)\| + \alpha_2(\omega) \|s_1(\omega)-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_3(\omega) \|s_2(\omega)-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| + \alpha_4(\omega) \|s_1(\omega)-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_5(\omega) \|s_2(\omega)-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\|. \end{aligned}\] Since \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction009} &&\|T(\omega, x_1(\omega))-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\|\nonumber\\ &\leq& \|T(\omega, x_1(\omega))-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\| + \|T(\omega, s_1(\omega))-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \|T(\omega, s_2(\omega))-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\|, \end{aligned}\] substituting [\[HardyRogerscontraction008\]](#HardyRogerscontraction008){reference-type="eqref" reference="HardyRogerscontraction008"} in [\[HardyRogerscontraction009\]](#HardyRogerscontraction009){reference-type="eqref" reference="HardyRogerscontraction009"}, we have \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction010} &&\|T(\omega, x_1(\omega))-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\|\nonumber\\ &\leq& \|T(\omega, x_1(\omega))-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\| + \|T(\omega, s_2(\omega))-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_1(\omega) \|s_1(\omega)-s_2(\omega)\| + \alpha_2(\omega) \|s_1(\omega)-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_3(\omega) \|s_2(\omega)-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| + \alpha_4(\omega) \|s_1(\omega)-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_5(\omega) \|s_2(\omega)-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\|. \end{aligned}\] Thus, from [\[HardyRogerscontraction003\]](#HardyRogerscontraction003){reference-type="eqref" reference="HardyRogerscontraction003"}, [\[HardyRogerscontraction004\]](#HardyRogerscontraction004){reference-type="eqref" reference="HardyRogerscontraction004"}, [\[HardyRogerscontraction005\]](#HardyRogerscontraction005){reference-type="eqref" reference="HardyRogerscontraction005"}, [\[HardyRogerscontraction006\]](#HardyRogerscontraction006){reference-type="eqref" reference="HardyRogerscontraction006"}, [\[HardyRogerscontraction007\]](#HardyRogerscontraction007){reference-type="eqref" reference="HardyRogerscontraction007"}, [\[HardyRogerscontraction010\]](#HardyRogerscontraction010){reference-type="eqref" reference="HardyRogerscontraction010"}, it follows that \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction011} &&\|T(\omega, x_1(\omega))-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\|\nonumber\\ &\leq& \alpha_1(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-x_2(\omega)\| + \alpha_2(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, x_1(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_3(\omega)\|x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\| + \alpha_4(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_5(\omega)\|x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, x_1(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + (1 + \alpha_2(\omega) + \alpha_5(\omega))\|T(\omega, x_1(\omega))-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && +(1 + \alpha_3(\omega) + \alpha_4(\omega))\|T(\omega, x_2(\omega))-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && +(\alpha_1(\omega) + \alpha_2(\omega) + \alpha_4(\omega))\|s_1(\omega)-x_1(\omega)\| \\ \nonumber && +(\alpha_1(\omega) + \alpha_2(\omega) + \alpha_4(\omega))\|s_2(\omega)-x_2(\omega)\|. \end{aligned}\] For any \(\omega \in \Omega\), sice \(T(\omega, x(\omega))\) is a continuous function of \(x(\omega)\), for any \(\varepsilon > 0\), there exists \(\delta_i(x_i(\omega)) > 0 ~~~ (i = 1, 2)\) such that \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction012} \| T(\omega, x_1(\omega))-T(\omega, s_1(\omega))\| < \frac{\varepsilon}{8} \end{aligned}\] whenever \(\| x_1(\omega)-s_1(\omega) \| < \delta_1(x_1(\omega))\) and \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction013} \| T(\omega, x_2(\omega))-T(\omega, s_2(\omega))\| < \frac{\varepsilon}{8} \end{aligned}\] whenever \(\| x_2(\omega)-s_2(\omega) \| < \delta_1(x_2(\omega))\). Now, choosing \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction014} \delta_1 = \min\Big\{\delta_1(x_1(\omega)), \frac{\varepsilon}{8}\Big\} \end{aligned}\] and \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction015} \delta_2 = \min\Big\{\delta_2(x_2(\omega)), \frac{\varepsilon}{8}\Big\}, \end{aligned}\] by [\[HardyRogerscontraction011\]](#HardyRogerscontraction011){reference-type="eqref" reference="HardyRogerscontraction011"}, we have \[\begin{aligned}
&&\|T(\omega, x_1(\omega))-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\|\nonumber\\ &\leq& \alpha_1(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-x_2(\omega)\| + \alpha_2(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, x_1(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_3(\omega)\|x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\| + \alpha_4(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_5(\omega)\|x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, x_1(\omega))\| + (1 + \alpha_2(\omega) + \alpha_5(\omega)) \frac{\varepsilon}{8} \\ \nonumber && + (1 + \alpha_3(\omega) + \alpha_4(\omega))\frac{\varepsilon}{8} + (\alpha_1(\omega) + \alpha_2(\omega) + \alpha_4(\omega)) \frac{\varepsilon}{8} \\ \nonumber && + (\alpha_1(\omega) + \alpha_2(\omega) + \alpha_4(\omega))\frac{\varepsilon}{8} \end{aligned}\] and so \[\begin{aligned}
&&\|T(\omega, x_1(\omega))-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\|\nonumber\\ &\leq& (2 + 2\sum^5_{i=1}\alpha_i(\omega))\frac{\varepsilon}{8} + \alpha_1(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-x_2(\omega)\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_2(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, x_1(\omega))\| + \alpha_3(\omega)\|x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_4(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\| + \alpha_5(\omega)\|x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, x_1(\omega))\|. \\ \nonumber \end{aligned}\] Since \(\varepsilon > 0\) is arbitrary, it follows that \[\begin{aligned}
\label{HardyRogerscontraction015} &&\|T(\omega, x_1(\omega))-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\|\nonumber\\ &\leq& \alpha_1(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-x_2(\omega)\| + \alpha_2(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, x_1(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_3(\omega)\|x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\| + \alpha_4(\omega)\|x_1(\omega)-T(\omega, x_2(\omega))\| \\ \nonumber && + \alpha_5(\omega)\|x_2(\omega)-T(\omega, x_1(\omega))\|. \end{aligned}\] Thus we have \(\omega \in \bigcap_{x_1, x_2 \in X}(C_{x_1, x_2} \cap A \cap B)\), which implies that
Also, we have
Therefore, we have
Let \(N' = \bigcap_{s_1, s_2 \in S}(C_{s_1, s_2} \cap A \cap B)\). Then \(\mu(N') = 1\), which implies that \(T(\omega, x)\) is a deterministic mapping. Hence \(T\) has a unique random fixed point in \(X\). This completes the proof. ◻
If \(\alpha_1(\omega) = \alpha_4(\omega) = \alpha_5(\omega) = 0\) in Theorem [\[Maintheorem1\]](#Maintheorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="Maintheorem1"}, then we obtain the following random fixed point theorem for Kannan's contraction:
If \(\alpha_1(\omega) = \alpha_2(\omega) = \alpha_3(\omega) = 0\) in Theorem [\[Maintheorem1\]](#Maintheorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="Maintheorem1"}, then we obtain the following random fixed point theorem for Chatterjea's contraction:
# **Applications to random nonlinear integral equations**
In this section, we give an application of Theorem [\[Maintheorem1\]](#Maintheorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="Maintheorem1"} to show the existence and uniqueness of a solution of a nonlinear stochastic integral equation of the Hammerstein type (): \[\aligned x(t;\omega)=h(t;\omega)+\int_Sk(t;s;\omega)f(s;x(s;\omega))d\mu(s), \endaligned \eqno{(4.1)}\] where (a) \(S\) is a locally compact metric space with metric d defined on \(S\times S\) and \(\mu_0\) is a complete \(\sigma\)-finite measure defined on the collection of Borel subsets of \(S;\) (b) \(\omega\in \Omega\) where \(\omega\) is the supporting set of the probability measure space \((\Omega, \beta, \mu);\) (c) \(x(t; \omega)\) is the unknown vector-valued random variable for each \(t \in S;\) (d) \(h(t; \omega)\) is the stochastic free term defined for \(t \in S;\) (e) \(k(t, s; \omega)\) is the stochastic kernel defined for \(t\) and \(s\) in \(S;\) (f) \(f(t, x)\) is a vector-valued function of \(t \in S\) and \(x.\) Note that the integral in the equation (4.1) is interpreted as a Bochner integral (). Further, we assume that the union of a countable family \(\{C_n\}\) of compact sets with \(C_{n+1}\subset C_n\) is defined as \(S\) such that, for each other compact set in \(S\), there exists \(C_i\) which contains it (see ). We define \(C=C(S, L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu))\) as a space of all continuous functions from \(S\) into the space \(L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu)\) with the topology of uniform convergence on compact sets of \(S\), that is, \(x(t; \omega)\) is a vector-valued random variable for each fixed \(t \in S\) such that
Noted that \(C(S, L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu))\) is a space of locally convex () whose topology is defined by the countable family of semi-norms given by
for each \(n\geq 1\). Furthermore, since \(L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu)\) is complete, \(C(S, L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu))\) is complete relative to this topology. Next, we define \(BC=BC(S, L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu))\) as a Banach space of all bounded continuous functions from \(S\) into \(L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu)\) with the norm
The space \(BC \subset C\) is a space of all second order vector-valued stochastic processes defined on \(S\) which are bounded and continuous in mean-square. Now, we consider the functions \(h(t; \omega)\) and \(f(t, x(t; \omega))\) to be in the \(C(S, L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu))\) space with respect to the stochastic kernel and assume that, for each pair \((t, s)\), \(k(t, s; \omega) \in L_\infty(\Omega, \beta, \mu)\) and the norm denoted by
Also, we suppose that \(k(t, s; \omega)\in L_\infty(\Omega, \beta, \mu)\) is such that \[\|| k(t, s; \omega)|\| = \| x(s; \omega)\|_{L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu)}\] is \(\mu\)-integrable with respect to \(s\) for each \(t \in S\) and \(x(s; \omega) \in C(S, L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu))\) and there exists a real-valued function \(G\) \(\mu\)-a.e. on \(S\) such that \(G(S) \| x(s; \omega) \|_{L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu))}\) is \(\mu\)-integrable and, for each pair \((t, s) \in S \times S\), \[\|| k(t, u; \omega)-k(s, u; \omega)|\| \cdot \| x(u; \omega)\|_{L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu)} \leq G(u)\| x(u; \omega)\|_{L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu)} ~~~~ \mu-a.e.\] Forward, assume that, for almost all \(s \in S\), \(k(t, s; \omega)\) is continuous in \(t\) from \(S\) into \(L_\infty(\Omega, \beta, \mu)\). Now, we define the random integral operator \(T\) on \(C(S, L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu))\) by \[\aligned (Tx)(t; \omega) = \int_Sk(t, s; \omega)x(s; \omega)d\mu(s), \endaligned \eqno{(4.2)}\] where the integral is a Bochner integral. From the conditions on \(k(t, s; \omega)\), it follows that, for each \(t \in S\), \((Tx)(t; \omega) \in L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu)\) and \((Tx)(t; \omega)\) is continuous in mean square by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, that is, \((Tx)(t; \omega) \in C(S, L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu))\).
By a *random solution* of the equation (4.1), we mean a function \[x(t; \omega) \in C(S, L_2(\Omega, \beta, \mu))\] which satisfies the equation (4.1) \(\mu-a.e.\) Now, by using Theorem [\[Maintheorem1\]](#Maintheorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="Maintheorem1"}, we prove the following:
**Open Problem:** Can Theorems [\[MainMotivate\]](#MainMotivate){reference-type="ref" reference="MainMotivate"} and [\[Maintheorem1\]](#Maintheorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="Maintheorem1"} be generalized to non-separable Banach spaces?
# **Acknowledgements** {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
The authors are gratefully thankful for referee's valuable comments, which significantly improve materials in this paper. The first author was supported by Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna (RMUTL) for Ph.D. program at King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT). Yeol Je Cho was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and future Planning (2014R1A2A2A01002100). This work was carried out while the third author (YJ. Cho) was visiting Theoretical and Computational Science Center (TaCS), Science Laboratory Building, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Bangkok, Thailand, during 15 January-2 march, 2016. He thanks Professor Poom Kumam and the University for their hospitality and support. Moreover, Poom Kumam was supported by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) and the King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT) under the TRF Research Scholar Award (Grant No. RSA6080047). | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:04:05', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01634', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01634'} |
# Introduction {#sec:intro}
The normal assumption is the basis of statistical analyses in several fields, such as medicine and health sciences. Indeed, under this assumption, standard parametric estimation and testing procedures are simple and most efficient. However, it is well known that these procedures are not robust when the normal distribution is just an approximate parametric model or in the presence of outliers in the observed data. A challenging example, characterised by the possible presence of outliers, is given by the study of discussed in Section 2, which focuses on the role of a protein in the production of immunoglobines and cytokines. In particular, the study concerns repeated measures of moderate sample size, for which it is shown that the classical Bayesian analysis through the normal Linear Mixed Model (LMM) is strongly influenced by outliers. In this case, it may be preferable to base inference on procedures that are more resistant, which specifically take into account the fact that the assumed models is only approximate. In order to produce statistical procedures that are stable with respect to small changes in the data or to small model departures, robust statistical methods can be considered. The concept of robustness has been widely discussed in the frequentist literature; see, for instance, and. On the other hand, Bayesian robustness literature is also well developed, most of which is focused on sensitivity with respect to the prior distribution; we mention here the overviews in, and. Recently, Bayesian robustness with respect to model misspecification have attracted considerable attention. For instance,, and discuss approaches based on robust pseudo-likelihood functions, i.e. the quasi-likelihood and the empirical likelihood, derived from robust \(M\)-estimation functions, as replacement of the genuine likelihood in Bayes' formula. discuss an approach for building posterior distributions from robust \(M\)-estimators using constrained Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. Approaches based on tilted likelihoods can be found in, and, among others. Finally, approaches based on model embedding through heavy-tailed distributions or on weighted likelihoods are discussed by and, respectively. However, the aforementioned approaches are not without limitations. In particular, robust posterior distributions derived from robust estimating functions have two drawbacks: the empirical likelihood is not computable for very small sample sizes and for moderate sample sizes appears to have always heavy tails; posterior distributions based on the quasi-likelihood can be easily obtained only for scalar parameters. The restricted likelihood approach of, as well as the previous approaches based on estimating equations can be computationally cumbersome with robust \(M\)-estimating functions in the context of LMM (see Sect. [5](#sec:application){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:application"}). The solution of embedding in a larger structure has the cost of eliciting a prior distribution for the extra parameters introduced in the analysis. Moreover, the statistical procedures derived under an embedded model are not necessarily robust in a broad sense, since the larger model may still be too restricted in the space of all distributions. Finally, the tilted and the weighted likelihood approaches refer to concepts of robustness that are not directly related to the one considered in this paper. Concretely, we focus on the robustness approach based on the influence function (\(IF\)), extensively discussed in book-length treatments by, and, and on the derivation of robust posterior distributions that condition on, generally insufficient, statistics with bounded \(IF\). Such a conditioning is performed by appealing to the well-developed frequentist robust \(M\)-estimation theory, i.e. unbiased \(M\)-estimating equations with bounded \(IF\), which provides estimators that target the parameter of interest and satisfy the usual asymptotical properties such as unbiasedness and normality. \(M\)-estimating functions are general unbiased estimating functions that include as special case the score function and scoring rules. To overcome the previous difficulties with current approaches to Bayesian robustness based on unbiased estimating equations, we propose an alternative method based on Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC). The typical motivation for the use of ABC is the intractability of the likelihood. Here, instead, we couple ABC with robust unbiased \(M\)-estimating functions. The idea can be seen as an extension of the results of to Bayesian robustness with respect to misspecification. The method is easy to implement and computationally efficient, even when the \(M\)-estimating functions are cumbersome to evaluate for different parameter values. Theoretical properties, implementation details and simulations results are discussed. Section 2 describes a motivating dataset on the glucose regulated protein94 (`GRP94`). Section 3 sets the necessary background. Section 4 describes the proposed method and its theoretical properties. Section 5 investigates the properties of the proposed method in the context of LMM through simulations and applies it to the `GRP94` dataset. Concluding remarks are given in Section 6.
# The `GRP94` dataset {#sec:amotiv}
The `GRP94` dataset concerns the measurement of glucose-regulated protein94 in plasma or other biological fluids and the study of its role as a tumour antigen, i.e. its ability to alter the production of immunoglobines (IgGs) and inflammatory cytokines in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of tumour patients. The study involved 28 patients admitted to the division of General Surgery of the Civil Hospital of Padova for ablation of primary, solid cancer of the gastro-intestinal tract. For each patient, gender, age (expressed in years), type and stage of tumour (ordinal scales of four levels) are given. Patient with ID 15 was removed from the study afterwards, for clinical reasons. Patients' plasma and PBMCs were challenged with GRP94 complexes and the level of IgG and of the cytokines: interferon\(\gamma\) (IFN\(\gamma\)), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 10 (IL-10) and tumour necrosis factor \(\alpha\) (TNF\(\alpha\)) were measured. Owing to time and cost constraints, for patients IDs 17, 27 and 28 only the IgG were measured. The following five treatments were considered: GRP94 at the dose of either 10 ng/ml or 100 ng/ml, GRP94 in complex with IgG (`GRP94+IgG`) at the doses 10 ng/ml or 100 ng/ml and IgG a the dose 100 ng/ml. Finally, baseline measurements of IgG and of the aforementioned cytokines were taken from untreated PMBCs. Although fresh patient's plasma and PMBCs are taken for each treatment and patient, the resulting measures are likely to be correlated since plasma and PMBCs are taken from the same patient. Hence, a LMM is a suitable model for this data. Using paired Mann-Whitney tests showed that GRP94 in complex with IgG at the higher dose can significantly inhibit the production of IgG and stimulate the secretion of IL-6 and TNF\(\alpha\) from PBMCs of cancer patients. In addition, some of the differences between treatments were significant for a specific gender; see for full details. Another feature of these data is the presence of extreme observations, both at baseline and challenged PMBCs-based measurements, as it can be seen from the strip plots in Figure [\[fig:eda01\]](#fig:eda01){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:eda01"}. Such extreme observations induce high variability on the response measurements, especially for IFN\(\gamma\), IL-6, IL-10 and TNF\(\alpha\). Hence, one must be cautious when fitting a LMM to such data; see Section [5](#sec:application){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:application"} for the complete analysis of the `GRP94` data.
# Background {#sec:background}
The present section provides an overview on concepts and methods that are needed to make the paper as much self-contained as possible. In particular, Section 3.1 gives background on robust \(M\)-estimation, Section 3.2 provides an overview on pseudo-likelihoods and Section 3.3 gives background on ABC.
## Robust \(M\)-Estimation {#ssec:robustm}
Let \(y = (y_1,\ldots, y_n)\) be a random sample of size \(n\), having independent and identically distributed components, according to a distribution function \(F_\theta =F(y;\theta)\), with \(\theta \in \Theta \subseteq {\rm I}\negthinspace {\rm R}^d\), \(d \geq 1\). Let \(L(\theta;y)\) be the likelihood function based on model \(F_\theta\). Let \(\Psi_\theta = \Psi(y;\theta)= \sum_{i=1}^n \psi(y_i;\theta)\) be an unbiased estimating function for \(\theta\), i.e. such that \(E_\theta (\psi(Y; \theta)) = 0\) for every \(\theta\), with \(\psi(\cdot)\) known function and with \(E_\theta(\cdot)\) expectation with respect to \(F_\theta\). Typically, \(\Psi_\theta\) can be written as \[\Psi_\theta = b(\theta)^\T a(y, \theta)-c(\theta)\,,\label{eq:typicalPsi}\] where \(a(\cdot,\cdot)\) and \(c(\cdot)\) are known vector-valued functions and \(b(\theta)\) may be a known vector-or matrix-valued function of suitable dimensions. The function \(c(\cdot)\) is typically a consistency correction, i.e. it ensures that \(E_\theta(\Psi_\theta)=0\). Most of the robust M-estimating functions can be recast in this form. A general \(M\)-estimator (see, e.g., [@hampel1986], [@huber2009robust]) is defined as the root \(\tilde\theta\) of the estimating equation \[\Psi_\theta = 0 \.\] The class of \(M\)-estimators is wide and includes a variety of well-known estimators. For example, it includes the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), the maximum composite likelihood estimator and the scoring rule estimator (see [@basu1998robust], [@dawid2016minimum], and references therein). Under broad conditions assumed throughout this paper (see, e.g., [@hampel1986], [@huber2009robust]), an \(M\)-estimator is consistent and approximately normal with mean \(\theta\) and variance \[\begin{aligned}
K (\theta) = H(\theta)^{-1} J(\theta) H(\theta)^{-\T} \, \label{var} \end{aligned}\] where \(H(\theta) =-E_\theta (\partial \Psi_\theta/\partial \theta^{\T})\) and \(J(\theta) = E_\theta(\Psi_\theta \Psi_\theta^{\T} )\) are the sensitivity and the variability matrices, respectively. The matrix \(G(\theta)=K(\theta)^{-1}\) is known as the Godambe information and the form of \(K(\theta)\) is due to the failure of the information identity since, in general, \(H(\theta) \neq J(\theta)\). The \(IF\) of the estimator \(\tilde\theta\) is given by \[IF (x;\tilde\theta,F_\theta) = H(\theta)^{-1} \psi (x;\theta) \,\] and it measures the effect on the estimator \(\tilde\theta\) of an infinitesimal contamination at the point \(x\), standardised by the mass of the contamination. The supremum of the \(IF\), i.e. the gross-error sensitivity, measures the worst influence on \(\tilde\theta\) and a desirable robustness property for a statistical procedure is that the gross-error sensitivity is finite, i.e. that the \(IF\) is bounded (B-robustness). Note that the \(IF\) of the MLE is proportional to the score function; therefore, in general, MLE has unbounded \(IF\), i.e. is not B-robust. On the contrary, if \(\psi(x; \theta)\) is bounded, then the corresponding \(M\)-estimator \(\tilde\theta\) is B-robust. Finally, note that the \(IF\) can also be used to evaluate the asymptotic covariance matrix of \(\tilde\theta\), since \(K (\theta)=E_\theta (IF(x;\tilde\theta,F_\theta) IF(x;\tilde\theta,F_\theta)^{\T})\).
## Pseudo-likelihoods from unbiased estimating functions {#ssec:pseudolik}
In general, there is not a unique function which has first derivative equal to \(\Psi_\theta\), and many efforts have been made in order to derive pseudo-likelihood functions for \(\theta\) based on \(\Psi_\theta\). Pseudo-likelihoods are functions of the parameter \(\theta\) and the data, with properties similar to a genuine likelihood function. Here we focus on three possible pseudo-likelihoods derived from \(\Psi_\theta\). A first pseudo-likelihood may be defined in terms of the conditional density of \(\tilde{\theta}\) given \(\theta\). In particular, assume that the joint density of \(y\) is parametrized in terms of \(\theta\) and a nuisance parameter \(\lambda\) as \[f(y;\theta,\lambda) = g(\tilde{\theta};\theta) h(y|\tilde{\theta};\theta,\lambda)\.\] Then \(g(\tilde\theta;\theta)\) is a pseudo-likelihood for \(\theta\) and its use is justified provided the information contained in \(h(y|\tilde{\theta};\theta,\lambda)\) about \(\theta\), when \(\lambda\) is unknown, is small or irrelevant. In practice \(g(\tilde{\theta};\theta)\) is unknown, but an approximation can be obtained via the bootstrap method ([see, e.g., @davison1992bootstrap; @boos1986bootstrap], [@rubin1981bayesian]), or by saddle-point approximations. The restricted likelihood method of can be seen as a simulation-based approximation of \(g(\tilde\theta;\theta)\). Other pseudo-likelihoods, such as the quasi-likelihood and the empirical likelihood provide other means of building pseudo-likelihood function directly from \(\Psi_\theta\). The quasi-likelihood is defined as \[L_Q(\theta) = \exp \left( \int_k^\theta A(t) \Psi(y;t) \, dt \right) \,\] where the matrix \(A(\theta)\) is such that \(A(\theta)^{\T} = J(\theta)^{-1} H(\theta)\) and \(k\) is an arbitrary constant. When \(d = 1\), \(L_Q(\theta)\) is usually easy to derive, but when \(d > 1\) the integrals is path-dependent. The adjustment \(\Psi_\theta^a = A(\theta) \Psi(y;\theta)\) of \(\Psi_\theta\) is necessary in order to recover the information identity, and thus the correct curvature (see, e.g., [@pacesalvan97], Chap. 4). Since \(|A(\theta)| \neq 0\), \(\Psi_\theta^a=0\) leads to the same solution \(\tilde\theta\) of the original estimating equation \(\Psi_\theta=0\) and the robustness properties of \(\tilde\theta\) do not depend on \(A(\theta)\) because this matrix does not change its \(IF\). The empirical likelihood \(L_E(\theta)\) is defined through the empirical likelihood ratio statistic \(W_E(\theta)=-2 \log R (\theta)\), with \(R (\theta)=\max_{p_i} \prod_{i=1}^n n p_i\), where the \(p_i\) weights satisfy \(p_i \geq 0\), \(\sum_{i=1}^n p_i=1\) and \(\sum_{i=1}^n \psi(y_i;\theta)p_i=0\). A Lagrangian argument leads to \[W_E (\theta) = 2 \sum_{i=1}^n \log ( 1+\eta^{\T} \psi(y_i;\theta) )\,,\] if \(\theta=0\) is inside the convex hull of \(\psi(y_1; \theta),\ldots, \psi(y_n; \theta)\); otherwise, it is adequate to set \(W_E(\theta)=+\infty\). The Lagrangian multiplier \(\eta = \eta(\theta)\) satisfies \(\sum_{i=1}^n \psi(y_i; \theta)/(1 + \eta^{\T} \psi(y_i; \theta)) = 0\). show that, under suitable regularity conditions, the bootstrap likelihood is asymptotically equivalent to first-order to the empirical likelihood \(L_E(\theta)\). Moreover, under standard regularity conditions, it can also be shown that the quasi-likelihood ratio statistic \(W_Q(\theta)\) and \(W_E(\theta)\) are equivalent to the first term of their Taylor expansions. Lastly, investigate connections between \(L_E(\theta)\) and saddlepoint pseudo-likelihoods in the case of \(M\)-estimating functions. In the Bayesian framework, the use of \(L_Q(\theta)\) in place of the proper likelihood has been discussed by and, while the use of \(L_E(\theta)\) has been discussed by, though not for robustness purposes, and by. Since \(L_Q(\theta)\) and \(L_E(\theta)\), as well as the bootstrap and the saddle-point likelihoods, share most of the properties of the genuine likelihood, they can be used as a replacement of the latter in the Bayes' formula which, in the case of robust estimating functions, leads to the robust posterior distribution \[\pi_R(\theta|y) \propto \pi(\theta) \, L_R(\theta) \, \label{postR}\] where \(\pi(\theta)\) is a prior distribution for \(\theta\) and \(L_R(\theta)\) is a pseudo-likelihood based on a robust \(\Psi_\theta\), i.e. \(L_Q(\theta)\), \(L_E(\theta)\). The approach based on robust posterior distributions ([\[postR\]](#postR){reference-type="ref" reference="postR"}) derived from robust \(M\)-estimating functions has two main drawbacks: the empirical likelihood is not computable for very small values of the sample size and for moderate sample sizes appears to have always heavy tails; the posterior distribution based on the quasi-likelihood can be easily obtained only for scalar parameters. Lastly, efficient use of bootstrap, empirical saddle-point and of restricted likelihood methods requires \(M\)-estimating functions that are easy to evaluate at different parameter values, which is generally not the case, especially in the context of this paper.
## Approximate Bayesian Computation {#ssec:approximate}
Given a prior \(\pi(\theta)\) and assuming that simulation from \(F_\theta\), at a given \(\theta\), is possible, the ABC method ([@tavare1997inferring], [@pritchard1999population]) can provide an approximation of the posterior distribution \(\pi(\theta|y)\), by means, for instance, of the accept-reject ABC algorithm (see Algorithm [\[alg:abc-ar\]](#alg:abc-ar){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:abc-ar"} and [@tavare1997inferring]). The latter
samples from the joint distribution \[\pi_{\epsilon}(\theta,y^*|y) = \frac{ \pi(\theta)f(y^*;\theta)\mathbb{I}_{A_{\epsilon,y}(y^*)} }{ \int_{A_{\epsilon,y} \times\Theta }\pi(\theta)f(y^*;\theta)\,dy^* d\theta} \,\] where \(\mathbb{I}_{A_{\epsilon,y}(y^*)}\) is the indicator function of the set \(A_{\epsilon,y}(y^*) = \{y^*:\,\rho(y^*,y)\leq\epsilon\}\), \(\rho(\cdot)\) is a given distance and \(\varepsilon>0\) is a fixed tolerance level. The ABC method provides an approximation of the posterior distribution \(\pi(\theta|y)\), given by \[\pi_{\epsilon}(\theta|y) = \int \pi_{\epsilon}(\theta,y^*|y)\,dy^* \.\] If \(\epsilon\to 0\), then \(\pi_{\epsilon}(\theta|y) \to \pi(\theta|y)\). The threshold \(\epsilon\) is generally set to the \(\alpha\)th quantile of the distance among the simulated and observed data, with \(\alpha\) being typically very small. In practice, the distance among the raw data can be rather noisy and a dimensional reduction of \(y\) and \(y^*\) is often necessary. This can be performed by considering a low-dimensional set of summary statistics \(t(\cdot) = (t_1(\cdot), \ldots,t_q(\cdot))\), for some \(q<n\), such as the mean, the median, quantiles etc. If \(t(\cdot)\) is sufficient, then the ABC posterior \(\pi_\epsilon(\theta|t(y))\) converges to the exact posterior as \(\epsilon\to0\). However, sufficient statistics are generally available only for models belonging to the exponential families. The choice of the summary statistic is therefore a crucial point of ABC and this issue has been widely discussed in the statistical literature. In particular, show that, when a full computable likelihood is available, the standardised score function evaluated at the observed MLE \(\hat\theta\), is an ideal summary statistic in ABC for a general model. This ideal summary statistic is given by \[\eta(y;\hat\theta) = B(\hat\theta)^{-1} \ell_\theta(\hat\theta;y) \, \label{score}\] where \(\ell_\theta(\theta;y)=\partial \log L(\theta;y)/\partial \theta\) is the score function and \(B(\theta)\) is the square root of the expected information \(i(\theta)\), i.e. is such that that \(i(\theta)=B(\theta) B(\theta)^{\T}\). When considering the Mahalanobis distance we have \[\rho(\eta(y;\hat\theta),\eta(y^*;\hat\theta)) = \ell_\theta(\hat\theta;y^*)^{\T} i(\hat\theta)^{-1} \, \ell_\theta(\hat\theta;y^*) \,\] which is the score test statistic computed at \(\hat\theta\), based on data \(y^*\). In situations in which the likelihood function is intractable, and a composite likelihood is available, show that the corresponding (suitably standardised) composite score function can be used as a summary statistic in ABC. The resulting ABC procedure is shown to be invariant to reparameterisations and it automatically adjusts the curvature of the composite likelihood and of the corresponding posterior distribution. Lastly, note that in practice the ABC accept-reject algorithm is computationally inefficient and more advanced algorithms, such as ABC coupled with MCMC (ABC-MCMC), are preferred.
# Robust ABC Bayesian inference {#sec:bayesian}
## Methodology {#ssec:method}
One possibility to perform robust Bayesian inference is to resort to a pseudo-posterior distribution of the form [\[postR\]](#postR){reference-type="eqref" reference="postR"}. However, as discussed in Section [3.2](#ssec:pseudolik){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:pseudolik"}, this approach has several limitations. A further computational limitation is that robust estimating equations \(\Psi_\theta\) typically involve consistency corrections which are often intractable functions of \(\theta\), defined as suitable expectations under the assumed model. See Section [4.4](#ssec:atoy){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:atoy"} for a simple illustrative example. Here we propose an alternative method for computing posterior distributions based on robust \(M\)-estimating functions. The method resorts to the ABC machinery in which a standardised version of \(\Psi_\theta\) is used as summary statistic. The idea is an extension of to the context of general unbiased estimating functions, though from a different perspective. The rescaled \(M\)-estimating function is \[\tilde\eta_R(y^{*}) = \eta_R(y^{*};\tilde\theta) = B_R(\tilde\theta)^{-1} \Psi(y^{*};\tilde\theta) \, \label{etar}\] where \(B_R(\theta)\) is such that \(J(\theta)=B_R(\theta) B_R(\theta)^{\T}\) and \(\tilde\theta=\tilde\theta(y)\) is based on the observed sample \(y\). To generate posterior samples we propose to use the ABC algorithm with an MCMC kernel (see Algorithm [\[alg:abc-mcmc\]](#alg:abc-mcmc){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:abc-mcmc"}), similar to Algorithm 2 of; see also. In Algorithm 2, \(K_h(\cdot)\) denotes a density kernel with bandwidth \(h\). The latter controls discrepancy between the observed and simulated summary statistics; in particular, the lower is \(h\) the lower is the discrepancy.
The proposed method via Algorithm [\[alg:abc-mcmc\]](#alg:abc-mcmc){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:abc-mcmc"} gives Markov-dependent samples from the ABC-R posterior \[\begin{aligned}
\pi_{ABC}^R(\theta|\tilde\theta) = \frac{\int_{\mathcal{Y}^*} \pi(\theta) \, f(y^*;\theta)K_h(\tilde\eta_R(y^*))\,dy^*}{\int_{\mathcal{Y}^*\times\Theta} \pi(\theta) \, f(y^*;\theta)K_h(\tilde\eta_R(y^*))\,dy^*d\theta} \. \label{postABCR} \end{aligned}\] Using similar arguments to, it can be shown that, for \(h \to 0\), \(\pi_{ABC}^R(\theta|\tilde\theta)\) converges to \(\pi(\theta|\tilde{\theta})\) pointwise, in the sense that \(\pi_{ABC}^R(\theta|\tilde\theta)\) and \(\pi(\theta|\tilde{\theta})\) are equivalent for sufficiently small \(h\). Since in general ([\[etar\]](#etar){reference-type="ref" reference="etar"}) is not sufficient, then \(\pi(\theta|\tilde\theta)\) may differ from \(\pi(\theta|y)\) and information is lost by using ([\[etar\]](#etar){reference-type="ref" reference="etar"}) instead of \(y\). However such a loss of efficiency pays off in terms of robustness in the inference about \(\theta\). Posteriors conditional on partial information have been extensively discussed in the literature ([see, e.g., @doksum1990 and reference therein]). study the properties of the ABC posterior when the summary statistic is the MLE or the pseudo-MLE derived from a simplified parametric model. However, they do not treat the case with the summary statistic given by an estimating function. Indeed, an alternative version of the ABC-R algorithm could be based on \(\tilde{\theta}\) used as the summary statistic and a, possibly rescaled, distance among the observed and the simulated statistic as in. Apparently, these two versions of ABC, namely the one based on \(\tilde{\theta}\) and that based on ([\[etar\]](#etar){reference-type="ref" reference="etar"}) seem to be treated in the literature as two separate approaches (see, e.g., [@gleim2013; @drovandi2015]). However, both methods use essentially the same statistic \(\tilde{\theta}\), but through different distance metrics. In addition, for small tolerances \(\epsilon\) and \(h\), these two distances converge to zero, and both methods give a posterior distribution conditional on the same statistic \(\tilde{\theta}\). Indeed, let \(\tilde{\theta}\) be the summary statistic of the usual ABC posterior and let the tolerance threshold \(\epsilon\) be sufficiently small and consider the random draw \(\theta^{*}\) and its corresponding simulated summary statistics \(\tilde\theta^{*}\) taken with the ABC algorithm. Then, by construction \(\tilde\theta^{*}\) will be close to \(\tilde{\theta}\). This implies that also \(\tilde\eta_R(y^*) = \eta_R(y^*;\tilde{\theta})\) will be close to \(\eta_R(y^*;\tilde{\theta}^*)=0\), and hence \(\theta^{*}\) is also a sample from the ABC-R posterior which uses the summary statistic \(\tilde\eta_R\). The use of \(\tilde{\theta}\) as summary statistic in ABC requires the solution of \(\Psi_\theta=0\) at each iteration, which is clearly computationally cumbersome. Therefore, this alternative approach will not be pursued further. Moreover, the proposed approach, besides sharing the same invariance properties stated by, i.e. invariance with respect to both monotonic transformation of the data or with respect to reparametrisations, has the advantage of avoiding some computational problems related to the evaluation of \(\Psi_\theta\) as shown by the following lemma.
## Theoretical properties {#ssec:theoretical}
Theorem [\[th:theo1\]](#th:theo1){reference-type="ref" reference="th:theo1"} below shows that the proposed method gives a robust approximate posterior distribution with the correct curvature, even though \(\Psi_\theta\), unlike the full score function, does not satisfy the information identity.
The ABC-R algorithm delivers thus a robust approximate posterior distribution which does not need calibration. This is not the case with ([\[postR\]](#postR){reference-type="ref" reference="postR"}) for which a calibration is typically required. The following Theorem [\[th:theo2\]](#th:theo2){reference-type="ref" reference="th:theo2"} shows that the proposed ABC approximate posterior distribution is asymptotically normal. In the theorem, the regularity assumptions of are assumed, as well as the Euclidean distance in the ABC-R algorithm. Under these assumptions the density of \(\tilde\theta\) is, for large \(n\), equivalent to the normal density with mean vector equal to \(\theta\) and covariance matrix equal to \(K(\theta)\), and the density of \(\Psi_\theta\) is, for large \(n\), equivalent to the normal density with zero mean vector and covariance matrix equal to \(J(\theta)\).
In view of Theorem [\[th:theo2\]](#th:theo2){reference-type="ref" reference="th:theo2"}, the resulting point estimates and credible sets converge to their frequentist analogues. If \(\psi(y;\theta)\) is bounded in \(y\), i.e. if the estimator \(\tilde\theta\) is B-robust, then the ABC-R posterior is resistant with respect to slight violations of the model assumptions. The advantage of the ABC-R posterior with respect to a robust posterior distribution of the form ([\[postR\]](#postR){reference-type="ref" reference="postR"}) is that the former allows to easily deal with multidimensional parameters, and thus avoids the difficulties of the quasi-likelihood. Moreover, it is computable also for very small sample sizes, provided \(\tilde\theta\) is finite, and thus avoids the numerical instabilities of the empirical likelihood.
Notice that the ABC method can be seen as inherently robust since the resulting posterior conditions on a user-specified subset of the data instead of on the full data, as in the classical Bayesian setting. Nevertheless, through the ABC-R method we are able to obtain a B-robust posterior, that is a posterior having summaries with a bounded influence function.
## Implementation details {#ssec:implementation}
Provided simulation from \(F_\theta\) is fast, the main demanding requirement of the proposed method is essentially the computation of the observed \(\tilde{\theta}\) and the scaling matrix \(B_R(\theta)\) evaluated at \(\tilde{\theta}\). The ABC-R Algorithm [\[alg:abc-mcmc\]](#alg:abc-mcmc){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:abc-mcmc"} involves a kernel density \(K_h(\cdot)\), which is governed by the bandwidth \(h\) and a proposal density \(q(\cdot\vert\cdot)\). Given that, for large sample sizes, \[\tilde{\eta}_R (y) \sim N_d(0_d, I_d)\,,\] where \(0_d\) is a \(d\)-vector of zeros and \(I_d\) is the identity matrix of order \(d\), it is reasonable to replace \(K_h(\cdot)\) with the multivariate normal density centred at zero and with covariance matrix \(hI_d\). To choose the bandwidth \(h\) we consider several pilot runs of the ABC-R algorithm for a grid of \(h\) values, and select the value of \(h\) that delivers approximately 1% acceptance ratio. Contrary to other ABC-MCMC settings in which the proposal requires pilot runs, in our case a scaling matrix for the proposal \(q(\cdot|\cdot)\) can be readily build, almost effortlessly, by using the usual sandwich formula [\[var\]](#var){reference-type="eqref" reference="var"} evaluated at \(\tilde\theta\). Even in cases in which \(H(\theta)\) and \(J(\theta)\) are not analytically available, they can be straightforwardly estimated via simulation. Indeed, in our experience, 100-500 samples from the model \(F_\theta\), with \(\theta =\tilde\theta\), give estimates with reasonably low Monte Carlo variability. Throughout the examples considered we use the multivariate \(t\)-density with 5 degrees of freedom as the proposal density \(q(\cdot|\cdot)\) and the ABC-R is always started from \(\tilde{\theta}\). An `R` implementation of the proposed method for linear mixed effects models is also provided through the `robustBLME` package available on `CRAN`. As a final remark, we note that robust estimating functions are available for many models of practical interest; see, among others,, ,, and and references therein. Therefore, it is straightforward to exted the application of the proposed method in such model settings.
## An illustrative example {#ssec:atoy}
We consider an example in which we compare the numerical properties of the ABC-R posterior, with the classical posterior based on the assumed model and the pseudo-posterior [\[postR\]](#postR){reference-type="eqref" reference="postR"} based on the empirical likelihood. Scenarios with data simulated either from the assumed model or from a slightly misspecified model are considered. Let \(F_\theta\) be a location-scale distribution with location \(\mu\) and scale \(\sigma>0\), and let \(\theta = (\mu, \sigma)\). \(M\)-estimation through Huber's estimating function is a standard choice for the robust estimation of location and scale parameters. The \(M\)-estimating function is \[\Psi_\theta = (\Psi_{\mu}, \Psi_{\sigma}) \,,\] with \[\begin{aligned}
\Psi_\mu = \sum_{i=1}^n \psi_{c_1}(z_i)\,\quad\text{and}\quad \Psi_\sigma = \sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(\psi_{c_2}(z_i)^2-k(c_2)\right) \, \label{huber} \end{aligned}\] where \(z_i = (y_i-\mu)/\sigma\), \(i=1,\ldots,n\), \(\psi_{c_1}(z) = \min(1;c_1/|z|)\) is the Huber \(\psi\)-function, \(c_1>0\) and \(c_2>0\) are scalar parameters which control the desired degree of robustness of \(\tilde{\theta}\), and \(k(\cdot)\) is a known function. As an example let \(F_\theta\) be the normal distribution \(N(\mu, \sigma^2)\) and assume \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\) a priori independent with \(\mu\sim N(0,10^2)\) and \(\sigma\sim \text{halfCauchy}(5)\), where \(\text{halfCauchy}(a)\) is the half Cauchy distribution with scale parameter equal to \(a\). We consider random samples of sizes \(n=\{15, 30\}\) drawn from either the normal distribution with \(\theta=(0,1)\) and from a contaminated model. The latter is given by \(F_\epsilon = (1-\epsilon)N(0,1) + \epsilon N(0, \sigma_1^2)\), with \(\sigma_1^2>0\). For illustration purposes, we set the contamination to 10%, i.e. \(\epsilon=0.1\), and we set \(\sigma_1^2=10\). Moreover, we assume \(c_1=1.345\) and \(c_2=2.07\), which imply that \(\tilde{\mu}\) and \(\tilde{\sigma}\) are, respectively, 5% and 10% less efficient than the corresponding MLE under the central (normal) model. In the simulation study we compute the genuine posterior distribution, e.g. the posterior based on the likelihood function of the normal model, the pseudo-posterior ([\[postR\]](#postR){reference-type="ref" reference="postR"}) based on the empirical likelihood (EL) and the ABC-R posterior. The genuine and the EL posteriors are computed by numerical integration. The ABC-R posterior is obtained using Algorithm [\[alg:abc-mcmc\]](#alg:abc-mcmc){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:abc-mcmc"} (Section [4.3](#ssec:implementation){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:implementation"}). From the posterior distributions illustrated in Figure [\[fig:fig1\]](#fig:fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:fig1"} we note that, when the data come from the central model (panels (a)-(b)), i.e. for \(\epsilon=0\), all the posteriors are in reasonable agreement, even if the EL posterior behaves slightly worse, especially the marginal posterior of \(\sigma\) with \(n=15\). When the data are contaminated (panels (c)-(d)), the genuine posterior is less trustworthy as the bulk of the posterior drifts away from the true parameter value (vertical and horizontal straight lines). This is not the case however for the ABC-R posterior which remains centered around the true parameter value. The behavior of the EL posterior is less clear-cut here. In particular, it seems to have bimodal shape with the dominant mode laying around the true value and the secondary mode being located distantly. Consequently, the EL posterior has higher spread than the ABC-R posterior.\
To assess the robustness of the ABC-R posterior, we consider a sensitivity analysis. We simulate a sample \(y\) of size \(n=31\) from the central model and the contaminated data are given by \(y^c = (y_{(j)},y_{(n/2)}+c)\), \(j=1,\ldots,n/2-1,n/2+1,\ldots,n\), where \(y_{(j)}\) denotes the \(j\)th ordered value of \(y\) and \(c\) a contamination scalar with possible values \(\{-15,-14,\ldots,15\}.\) The results of the sensitivity analysis, illustrated by means of violin plots in Figure [\[fig:fig2\]](#fig:fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:fig2"}, highlight that the posterior median (the symbol \"\(\circ\)\") of the genuine posterior (panel (c)) is substantially driven by \(c\). The \(y\)-axis is left free in order to enhance the of readability of the plot. On the other hand, the ABC-R and the EL posteriors are more resistant. For all the posteriors, the behavior of the posterior median reflects the behavior of the influence function of the posterior mode. Finally, the EL posterior under contamination is much more dispersed than the ABC-R posterior. Hence, even in an example as simple as this, robust inference based on the ABC-R posterior appears to be more precise than inference based on the EL posterior.
# Application to LMM {#sec:application}
## Classical and Robust Estimation of LMM {#ssec:classical}
The linear mixed model is a popular framework for analysing datasets in the context of hierarchical, longitudinal or repeated measures. A general formulation of LMM is by the following regression equation \[y = X\alpha + \sum_{i= 1}^{c-1} Z_i\beta_i + \varepsilon\,, \label{eq:model}\] where \(y\) is a \(n\)-vector of the response observations; \(X\) and \(Z_i\) are known \(n\times q\) and \(n\times p_i\) design matrices respectively; \(\alpha\) is a \(q\)-vector of unknown fixed effects; the \(\beta_i\) are \(p_i\)-vectors of unobserved random effects \((1\leq i \leq c-1)\); and \(\varepsilon\) is an \(n\)-vector of unobserved errors. The \(p_i\) levels of each random effect \(\beta_i\) are assumed to be independent with mean zero and variance \(\sigma_i^2\). Moreover, each random error \(\varepsilon_i\) is assumed to be independent with mean zero and variance \(\sigma_c^2\) and \(\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_{c-1}\) and \(\varepsilon\) are assumed to be independent. In this paper we focus on the classical normal LMM, which assumes that \(\varepsilon \sim N_n(0_n,\sigma_c^2I_n)\) and \(\beta_i \sim N(0, \sigma_i^2)\), \(i=1, \dots, c-1\). Obviously, the validity and performance of this LMM requires strict adherence to the model assumption, which is usually chosen because it simplifies the analyses and not because it fits exactly the data at hand. The robust procedure discussed in this paper specifically takes into account the fact that the normal model is only approximate and then it produces statistical analyses that are stable with respect to outliers, deviations from the model or model misspecifications. Under [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} and the aforementioned assumptions, it follows that \(Y\) is multivariate normal with \[E(Y) = X\alpha\quad \text{and} \quad \text{var}(Y) = V = \sum_{i = 1}^{c-1}\sigma_{i}^2Z_iZ_i^\T\,,\] where \(Z_{c} = I_n\). We assume that the set of \(d = q + c\) unknown parameters \(\theta = (\alpha, \sigma^2) = (\alpha, \sigma_{1}^2,\ldots,\sigma_{c}^2)\) is identifiable. Although the \(n\) observations \(y\) are not independent, if the random effects are nested, then independent subgroups of observations can be found. Indeed, in many situations, \(y\) can be split into \(g\) independent groups of observations \(y_j\), \(j = 1, \ldots,g\). In this case the log-likelihood function is \[\ell(\theta) = (-1/2)\sum_{j = 1}^g \left\{\log\vert V_j\vert + (y_j-X_j\alpha)^\T V_j^{-1}(y_j-X_j\alpha)\right\}\,,\label{eq:lmmlik}\] where \((y_1,\ldots,y_g)\), \(X\) and \(V\) are partitioned conformably. Classical Bayesian inference for \(\theta\) is based on the posterior distribution \(\pi(\theta|y)\propto \exp\{\ell(\theta)\} \, \pi(\theta)\), where \(\pi(\theta)\) is a prior distribution for \(\theta\). However, \(\ell(\theta)\) in the Gaussian LMM [\[eq:lmmlik\]](#eq:lmmlik){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:lmmlik"} can be very sensitive to model deviations. This is because in the LMM framework a strict adherence to the multivariate normal model is required, and even a mild deviation from this model can have a great impact on the inferential results ([@richardson1995robust], [@richardson1997bounded], [@copt2006high]); see also results of the simulation study in Section [5.2](#ssec:simulation){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:simulation"}. There is a rich variety of robust inferential procedures for LMM in the presence of model misspecification: \(M\)-estimators, \(S\)-estimators, \(MM\)-estimators and multivariate \(t\) distributions. The \(M\)-, \(S\)-and \(MM\)-estimation in the LMM framework provide robust estimators derived from estimating equations which are unbiased under the central model. In particular, \(S\)-and \(MM\)-estimators provide robust estimators with high breakdown point, but they are generally available only for balanced designs. Robustness and efficiency in \(M\)-, \(S\)-and \(MM\)-type estimators is guided by tuning constants which in practice are fixed by choosing the desired amount of robustness or, equivalently, by setting the desired loss of efficiency with respect to the MLE. The multivariate \(t\) framework deals with robustness by replacing the normal model with the multivariate \(t\), but at the cost of introducing the degrees of freedom as an additional unknown parameter. Here we focus on robust inference in LMM through the \(M\)-estimation approach as pioneered by, and and extend it to the Bayesian framework through the ABC-R method. The aforementioned M-estimation approach is very general as it can deal with a wide variety of situations; for instance it can deal with unbalanced designs and robustness with respect to the design matrix. Motivated by the `GRP94` dataset of Section [2](#sec:amotiv){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:amotiv"}, in the present work we focus on robustness with respect to the response variable. Following , we focus on bounded of M-estimating functions of the form \[\begin{aligned}
\begin{dmath} X^\T V^{-1/2}\psi_{c_1}\left(V^{-1/2}(y-X\alpha)\right)=0\,, \label{eq:richalpha}\\ \end{dmath} \begin{dmath} (1/2)\left\{ \psi_{c_2}\left(V^{-1/2}(y-X\alpha)\right)^\T V^{-1/2} Z_iZ_i^\T V^{-1/2} \\ \times \psi_{c_2}\left(V^{-1/2}(y-X\alpha)\right)-\text{tr}(CPZ_iZ_i^\T)\right\}=0 \condition{for \(i = 1,\ldots,c\)} \label{eq:richsigma} \end{dmath} \end{aligned}\] where \(C = E(\psi_{c_2}(R)\psi_{c_2}(R)^\T)\), with \(R = V^{-1/2}(Y-X\alpha)\), \(P = V^{-1}-V^{-1}X(X^\T V^{-1}X)^{-1}X^\T V^{-1}\) and \(\text{tr}(\cdot)\) is the trace operator. The function \(\text{tr}(CPZ_iZ_i)\) is a correction factor needed to ensure consistency at the Gaussian model for each \(i=1,\ldots,c\). call [\[eq:richalpha\]](#eq:richalpha){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:richalpha"}-[\[eq:richsigma\]](#eq:richsigma){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:richsigma"} robust REML II estimating equations as they are bounded versions of restricted likelihood equations. shows that the estimator of \(\theta\) given by the solution of [\[eq:richalpha\]](#eq:richalpha){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:richalpha"}-[\[eq:richsigma\]](#eq:richsigma){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:richsigma"} is asymptotically normal with mean the true parameter \(\theta\) and variance matrix of the form [\[var\]](#var){reference-type="eqref" reference="var"}.
## Simulation study {#ssec:simulation}
Let us consider the following two-component nested model \[y_{ij} = \mu + \alpha_j + \beta_i + \varepsilon_{ij}\,,\label{eq:modsim}\] where \(\mu\) is the grand mean; \(\alpha_j\) are the fixed effects, constrained such that \(\sum_{j=1}^q \alpha_j=0\); \(\beta_i\sim N(0,\sigma_1^2)\) are the random effects and \(\varepsilon_{ij}\sim N(0,\sigma_2^2)\) is the residual term, for \(j = 1,\ldots,q\) and \(i = 1,\ldots,g\). This model is a particular case of [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"}, with \(c = 2\), a single random effect \(\beta = \beta_1\) with \(p_1 = g\) levels and \(Z_1\) being the unit diagonal matrix. Furthermore, the covariate is a categorical variable with \(q\) levels hence the design matrix is given by \(q-1\) dummy variables. We asses bias and efficiency of the proposed method via simulations with 500 Monte Carlo replications. For each Monte Carlo replication, the true values for the variance components \((\sigma_1^2,\sigma^2_2)\) and those of \(\alpha\) are drawn uniformly in \((1,10)\times(1,10)\) and \((-5,5)\), respectively. With these parameter values, two datasets each of size \(g\) are generated: one from the central model and one from the contaminated model \(F_\epsilon = (1-\epsilon)N(X_i^\T\alpha,V_i) + \epsilon N(X_i^\T\alpha, 15V_i)\), with \(\epsilon = 0.10\). We consider \(q = \{3, 5, 7\}\) and \(g = \{30, 50, 70\}\). Prior distributions are \(\alpha\sim N_q(0,10^2I_q)\) and \((\sigma_1^2,\sigma^2_2) \sim \text{halfCauchy}(7)\times\text{halfCauchy}(7)\). For each scenario, we fit model [\[eq:modsim\]](#eq:modsim){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:modsim"} in the classical Bayesian way, using an adaptive random walk Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The same model is fitted by the ABC-R method using the estimating equations [\[eq:richalpha\]](#eq:richalpha){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:richalpha"}-[\[eq:richsigma\]](#eq:richsigma){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:richsigma"}. As in, we set \(c_1 = 1.345\) and \(c_2 = 2.07\). To find \(\tilde{\theta}\), we solve [\[eq:richalpha\]](#eq:richalpha){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:richalpha"}-[\[eq:richsigma\]](#eq:richsigma){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:richsigma"} iteratively until convergence, as suggested by. The classical REML estimate, computed by the `lmer` function of the `lme4` package, is used as starting value. In our experiments, the convergence of the solution is quite rapid, i.e. \(\tilde{\theta}\) stabilises within 10 to 15 iterations. We assess the component-wise bias of the posterior median \(\tilde\theta_m\) by the modulus of \(\tilde{\theta}_m-\theta_0\) in logarithmic scale, where \(\theta_0\) is the true value. Moreover, the efficiency of the classical Bayesian estimator relative to the ABC-R estimator is assessed through the index \(MD_{MCMC}/MD_{ABC}\), where \(MD = \text{med}(\tilde{\theta}_m-\theta_0)\). A similar index is used also by . In addition, for each Monte Carlo replication we compute the Euclidean distance of \(\tilde\theta_m\) from \(\theta_0\), which can be considered as a global measure of bias. Contrary to, we consider a different \(\theta_0\) for each Monte Carlo replication. For this reason, instead of just summarising the distribution of bias and efficiency by simple statistics we find it more informative to depict them graphically. The bias and efficiency of the classical Bayesian posterior and of the ABC-R posterior for the 500 replications are illustrated in Figures [\[fig:fig3\]](#fig:fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:fig3"} and [\[fig:fig4\]](#fig:fig4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:fig4"}, respectively. Under the central model, inference with the ABC-R and the classical Bayesian posteriors is roughly similar, i.e. both bias (component-wise and global) and efficiency compare equally well across the two methods. This holds for both the fixed effects \(\alpha\) and for the variance components \((\sigma_1^2,\sigma^2_2)\). The latters present more bias than the formers. Under the contaminated model, we notice important differences among ABC-R and the classical Bayesian estimation. In particular, \(\tilde{\theta}_m\) based on ABC-R is less biased, both globally and on a component by component basis, and more efficient. The gain in efficiency is particularly evident for the variance components.
## Effects of GRP94-based complexes on IgG and cytokines {#sec:antitumour}
We fit the two-component nested LMM [\[eq:modsim\]](#eq:modsim){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:modsim"} with ABC-R using estimating equations [\[eq:richalpha\]](#eq:richalpha){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:richalpha"}-[\[eq:richsigma\]](#eq:richsigma){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:richsigma"} to each of the five response variables: IgG, IFN\(\gamma\), IL-6, IL-10 and TNF\(\alpha\). Since all measures are positive and some of them are highly skewed, a logarithmic transformation is used in order to alleviate distributional skewness. Furthermore, since highlight a possible gender effect (especially with respect to the cytokines) we check for gender effects by including an interaction with gender. In the multivariate form, the model with interaction can be written as \[y_{i} = X_{i}^\T\alpha + X_i^\T\times\text{w}_i\gamma +\beta_i{1}_6 + \varepsilon_{i}\,,\quad i = 1,\ldots, g\label{eq:modinteract}\] where \(X_i\) is the matrix of covariates for the \(i\)th unit, w\(_i\) is a dummy variable for gender, \(\gamma\) is the fixed effect of the treatment-gender interaction, \({1_6}\) is the unit vector of dimension 6. The number of statistical units \(g\) is equal to 27 for the response IgG and 24 for the other response variables. Notice that the interaction model [\[eq:modinteract\]](#eq:modinteract){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:modinteract"} has \(12\) unknown fixed effects \((\alpha,\gamma)\). As there is no extra-experimental information, we use relatively diffused priors. In particular, we assume \(\alpha_j\sim N(0,100)\) and \(\gamma_j\sim N(0,100)\), for \(j = 1,\ldots,6\). For the variance components, following the recommendation of, we assume \(\sigma_{1}^2\sim \text{halfCauchy}(7)\) and \(\sigma_{2}^2\sim \text{halfCauchy}(7)\) in both models. ABC-R posterior samples are drawn using Algorithm [\[alg:abc-mcmc\]](#alg:abc-mcmc){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:abc-mcmc"} and following the implementation details of Section [4.3](#ssec:implementation){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:implementation"}. For comparison purposes, we fit also a classical Bayesian LMM with the aforementioned prior; an adaptive random walk Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is used for sampling from this posterior. Figure [\[fig:lmmfit\]](#fig:lmmfit){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:lmmfit"} compares the ABC-R and the classical posterior for a subset of the fixed effects of models [\[eq:modsim\]](#eq:modsim){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:modsim"} and [\[eq:modinteract\]](#eq:modinteract){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:modinteract"} by means of kernel density estimations. The parameters shown are those referring to the treatments based on GRP94 at the dose of 10 ng/ml (`GRP94_10`), GRP94 at the dose of 100 ng/ml (`GRP94_100`) and GRP94 in complex with IgG at the dose of 100 ng/ml (`GRP94+IgG_100`), which according to are the most prominent. In Figure [\[fig:lmmfit\]](#fig:lmmfit){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:lmmfit"}, panels (a1) to (e1) report the marginal posteriors of the fixed effects of [\[eq:modsim\]](#eq:modsim){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:modsim"} (with `baseline` being the reference category), fitted to the five response variables, respectively; panels (a2) to (e2) give those of [\[eq:modinteract\]](#eq:modinteract){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:modinteract"} (with `baseline` and `female` being the reference categories). Numbers within parenthesis in the plot sub titles give the evidence in favour of the null hypothesis H\(_0\) that the parameter is equal to zero, computed under the Full Bayesian Significance Testing (FBST) setting of; inside the parenthesis, the first (last) value from left refers to the ABC-R (classical) posterior. The FBST in favour of \(H_0\) has been proposed by as an intuitive measure of evidence, defined as the posterior probability related to the less probable points of the parametric space. It favours the null hypothesis whenever it is large and it is based on a specific loss function and thus the decision made under this procedure is the action that minimises the corresponding posterior risk. The FBST solves the drawback of the usual Bayesian procedure for testing based on the Bayes factor (BF), that is, when the null hypothesis is precise and improper or vague priors are assumed, the BF can be undetermined and it can lead to the so-called Jeffreys-Lindleys paradox. In panel (a1), the first plot from left reports the marginal distributions of the expected difference in terms of IgG between treatment `GRP94_10` and baseline. It shows that such a treatment is quite different from baseline measurements, because under the classical Bayesian LMM the evidence is zero to three decimal places, wheres under the ABC-R posterior the evidence is as low as 0.002. In what follows, evidences greater than 0.15 are treated as not worth mentioning and are therefore omitted. From the plots we can conclude the following. There is a high posterior probability that the marginal treatments are different from the baseline, since the evidence of H\(_0\) is rather low. However, the interaction with gender seem not to be supported. Although the density plots reveal some qualitative differences between the classical and the proposed robust Bayesian LMM, the evidences in favour of H\(_0\) according to these posteriors, are rather low and in reasonable agreement, hence the message they convey is the same.\
No marginal nor interaction effects seem to be supported by the data for this variable according to both the classical and the proposed robust method.\
The classical Bayesian LMM suggests that there is a marginal effect of `GRP94_10` and of `GRP94_100` as in both cases the evidence is low, i.e. less than 0.05. Furthermore, there is also evidence of an interaction effect of the latter with gender. However, on the basis of the ABC-R posterior, only `GRP94_100` shows a marginal effect with respect to the baseline and no interaction effects are worth mentioning. These apparently contradictory results can be explained by the presence of few patients with extreme observations (see Figure [\[fig:eda01\]](#fig:eda01){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:eda01"}) which seem to drive the classical LMM posterior but not the ABC-R posterior.\
For both these variables we notice both marginal and interaction effects of `GRP94_100` under the classical Bayesian LMM. However, such effects disappear under the robust ABC-R procedure, which again signals that the classical LMM posterior is driven by few extreme observations (see Sect. [2](#sec:amotiv){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:amotiv"}).
# Final remarks | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:06:37', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01752', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01752'} |
null | null |
null | null |
# Introduction
The Ehrhart polynomial of a lattice polytope counts the number of lattice points in its integer dilates and is arguably the most fundamental arithmetic invariant of a lattice polytope. It is a cornerstone of geometric combinatorics and appears in various guises in other areas of mathematics such as commutative algebra, optimization, representation theory, or voting theory (see, e.g., ). Concepts from Ehrhart theory have been generalized in various directions; for example, \(q\)-analogs of Ehrhart polynomials, equivariant versions, multivariate extensions , and generalizations to valuations. Recently, Ludwig and Silverstein introduced Ehrhart tensor polynomials based on discrete moment tensors that were defined by Böröczky and Ludwig . Let \(\mathcal{P}({\Z^d})\) denote the family of convex polytopes with vertices in \(\mathbb{Z}^d\) called **lattice polytopes** and let \(\mathbb{T}^r\) be the vector space of symmetric tensors of rank \(r\) on \(\mathbb{R}^d\). For \(x,y \in \mathbb{R}^d\), we write \(xy\) for \(x\otimes y\). In particular, \(x^r=x\otimes \cdots \otimes x\) and we set \(x^0 :=1\). The **discrete moment tensor of rank \(r\)** of a polytope \(P\in\mathcal{P}({\Z^d})\) is \[\label{eq:discretemoment} \operatorname{L}^{r}(P) \ = \ \sum_{x\in P\cap\mathbb{Z}^d}x^{r}\] where \(r\in\mathbb{N}\) and \(\mathbb{N}\) denotes the set of nonnegative integers. Note that, for our convenience, this definition differs by a scalar from the original definition given in . A version of \(\operatorname{L}^{r}(P)\), the discrete directional moment, was studied in . For \(r=0\), the usual **discrete volume** or **lattice point enumerator** \(\operatorname{L}(P):=\operatorname{L}^0 (P) = |P\cap \mathbb{Z}^d|\) is recovered. For \(r=1\), \(\operatorname{L}^1(P)\) equals the discrete moment vector defined in . Based on results by Khovanskiı̆ and Pukhlikov and Alesker, it was identified in that \(\operatorname{L}^r (nP)\) is given by a polynomial, for any \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), extending Ehrhart's celebrated result for the lattice point enumerator .
The expansion of \(\operatorname{L}^r(nP)\) will be denoted as \(\operatorname{L}_P^r(n)\) and is called the **Ehrhart tensor polynomial** of \(P\) in commemoration of this result. Furthermore, the coefficients \(\operatorname{L}^r_1,\dots,\operatorname{L}^r_{d+r}\) are the **Ehrhart tensor coefficients** or **Ehrhart tensors**. A fundamental and intensively studied question in Ehrhart theory is the characterization of Ehrhart polynomials and their coefficients. The only coefficients that are known to have explicit geometric descriptions are the leading, second-highest, and constant coefficients for the classic Ehrhart polynomial (see, e.g., ). For the Ehrhart tensor polynomial, the leading and constant coefficients were given in and we give an interpretation for the second-highest coefficient (Proposition [\[prop:secondcoeff\]](#prop:secondcoeff){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:secondcoeff"}) as the weighted sum of moment tensors over the facets of the polytope; the descriptions of all are given in Section [2](#sec:discretemoment){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:discretemoment"}. Conversely, for lattice polygons, the coefficients of the Ehrhart polynomial are positive and well-understood. They are given by Pick's Formula . Let \(\partial P\) denote the boundary of the polytope \(P\), for any \(P\in\mathcal{P}({\Z^d})\).
In Section [4](#sec:pick){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:pick"}, we determine Pick-type formulas for the discrete moment vector and matrix. Our interpretation of the coefficients is given with respect to a triangulation of the respective polygon. The principal tool we use to study Ehrhart tensor polynomials are **\(h^r\)-tensor polynomials** which encode the Ehrhart tensor polynomial in a certain binomial basis. Extending the notion of the usual Ehrhart \(h^\ast\)-polynomial, we consider \[\operatorname{L}^r(nP) \ = \ h^{r}_0 (P){n+d+r \choose d+r}+h^{r}_1 (P){n+d+r-1 \choose d+r}+ \ \cdots \ + h^{r}_{d+r} (P){n \choose d+r} \,\] for a \(d\)-dimensional lattice polytope \(P\) and define the **\(h^r\)-tensor polynomial** of \(P\) to be \[h^{r}_P (t)\ = \ \sum _{i=0}^{d+r}h^{r}_i(P)t^i.\] We determine a formula for the \(h^r\)-tensor polynomial of half-open simplices (Theorem [\[prop:h_cone\]](#prop:h_cone){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:h_cone"}) by using **half-open decompositions of polytopes**; an important tool which was introduced by Köppe and Verdoolaege . From this formula and the existence of a unimodular triangulation, we deduce an interpretation of all Ehrhart vectors and matrices of lattice polygons. Stanley's Nonnegativity Theorem is a foundational result which states that all coefficients of the \(h^\ast\)-polynomial of a lattice polytope are nonnegative. Stanley moreover proved that the coefficients are monotone with respect to inclusion; that is, for all lattice polytopes \(Q \subseteq P\) and all \(0\leq i\leq d\), it holds that \(h^{\ast}_i(Q)\leq h^{\ast}_i(P)\). Using half-open decompositions, it was proven in that, with regard to translation invariant valuations, monotonicity and nonnegativity are equivalent. In Section [5](#sec:positivity){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:positivity"}, we discuss notions of positivity for Ehrhart tensors and investigate Ehrhart tensor polynomials and \(h^2\)-tensor polynomials with respect to **positive semidefiniteness**. In contrast to the usual Ehrhart polynomial, Ehrhart tensor coefficients can even be negative definite for lattice polygons (Example [\[ex:nonpositiveEhrharttensors\]](#ex:nonpositiveEhrharttensors){reference-type="ref" reference="ex:nonpositiveEhrharttensors"}). Moreover, the coefficients of \(h^2\)-tensor polynomials are not monotone which is demonstrated by Example [\[ex:counter_ex_monotonicity\]](#ex:counter_ex_monotonicity){reference-type="ref" reference="ex:counter_ex_monotonicity"}. Therefore, techniques such as irrational decompositions and half-open decompositions that have been used to prove Stanley's Nonnegativity Theorem (see ) can not immediately be applied to \(h^2\)-tensor coefficients. Nevertheless, considering an intricate decomposition of lattice points inside a polygon, we are able to prove positive semi-definiteness of the coefficients of \(h^2\)-tensor polynomial in dimension two (Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}). We remark here that the theorem holds true for lattice polygons in a higher dimensional ambient space. Furthermore, all of the results given in this article are independent of the ambient space. Based on computational results, we further conjecture positive-semidefiniteness of the \(h^2\)-tensor coefficients in higher dimensions (Conjecture [\[conj:pos\]](#conj:pos){reference-type="ref" reference="conj:pos"}). In Section [6](#sec:further){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:further"}, we prove a generalization of Hibi's Palindromic Theorem characterizing reflexive polytopes as having palindromic \(h^r\)-tensor polynomials for \(r\in\mathbb{N}\) of even rank and conclude by discussing possible future research directions.
# Discrete moment tensors {#sec:discretemoment}
We introduce some general notions we will use here yet assume basic knowledge of polyhedral geometry and, in particular, lattice polytopes. For further reference, we recommend . We work in \(d\)-dimensional Euclidean space, \(\mathbb{R}^d\), equipped with the scalar product \(u\cdot v\), for any \(u,v\in\mathbb{R}^d\). The vector space of symmetric tensors \(\mathbb{T}^r\) is then canonically isomorphic to the space of multi-linear functionals from \((\mathbb{R}^d)^r\) to \(\mathbb{R}\) that are invariant with respect to permutations of the arguments. We have \(\mathbb{T}^0=\mathbb{R}\) and can now identify \(\mathbb{T}^1\) with \(\mathbb{R}^d\). Given the standard orthonormal basis \(e_1,\dots,e_d\), any tensor \(T\in\mathbb{T}^r\) can be written uniquely as \[T\ = \ \sum_{1\leq i_j\leq d}T_{i_1\dots i_r}e_{i_1}\otimes\dots\otimes e_{i_r}.\] For \(r=2\), the bilinear form \(T\in\mathbb{T}^2\) can then be identified with a symmetric \(d\times d\) matrix \(T=(T_{ij})\). To that end, we will call the discrete moment tensor ([\[eq:discretemoment\]](#eq:discretemoment){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:discretemoment"}) of ranks 1 and 2 the **discrete moment vector** and **discrete moment matrix**, respectively. We will also regard their associated coefficients, their Ehrhart tensors, as **Ehrhart vectors** and **Ehrhart matrices**. Prior to describing the known Ehrhart tensors, we provide some properties of the discrete moment tensor that we will need. Considering \(\operatorname{L}^r\) with respect to its coordinates, for any \(P\in\mathcal{P}({\Z^d})\), gives \[\operatorname{L}^r(P) (e_{i_1}, \dots, e_{i_r})\ = \ \sum_{x\in P\cap\mathbb{Z}^n} (x\cdot e_{i_1}) \cdots (x\cdot e_{i_r}).\] Hence the action of \(\mathrm{GL} (\mathbb{Z}^d)\), the general linear group over the integers, on \(\operatorname{L}^r\) is observed to be \[\operatorname{L}^r(\phi P) (e_{i_1}, \dots, e_{i_r})\ = \ \operatorname{L}^r(P) (\phi^t e_{i_1}, \dots, \phi^t e_{i_r})\] for any \(P\in\mathcal{P}({\Z^d})\) and \(\phi\in\mathrm{GL} (\mathbb{Z}^d)\); we say that \(\operatorname{L}^r\) is **\(\mathrm{GL} (\mathbb{Z}^d)\) equivariant**. We let \(P^o\) denote the relative interior of \(P\) with respect to its affine hull, denoted by \(\aff (P)\), and for any \(P\in\mathcal{P}({\Z^d})\) and \(r\in\mathbb{N}\) we set \[\operatorname{L}^r(P^o)\ := \ \sum _{x\in P^o} x^r.\] For the discrete volume, the Ehrhart-Macdonald reciprocity was a fundamental result in Ehrhart theory that was established by Ehrhart and first proven by Macdonald .
A general version of this result was given for translation invariant valuations by McMullen . Unlike the discrete volume, the discrete moment tensor varies under translations by elements in \(\mathbb{Z}^d\). More precisely, for all \(r\in\mathbb{N}\), the discrete moment tensor of a translated polytope is \[\operatorname{L}^{r}(P+t) \ = \ \sum _{j=0} ^r {r\choose j}\operatorname{L}^{r-j}(P)t^j \,\] and we say that the discrete moment tensor is covariant with respect to translations or **translation covariant**. A **unimodular transformation** of a polytope \(P\in\mathcal{P}({\Z^d})\) is a \(\mathrm{GL} (\mathbb{Z}^d)\) transformation of \(P\) paired with a translation. Similar to McMullen, a reciprocity theorem was given for translation covariant valuations in . Extending the classical Ehrhart-Macdonald reciprocity, the following reciprocity theorem gives the special case of the discrete moment tensor.
We use this theorem in our characterization of the second-highest Ehrhart tensor. A complete characterization of the Ehrhart coefficients has been inaccessible up to this point. The coefficients can even be negative and, therefore, are difficult to describe combinatorially. However, it is known that the leading coefficient equals the volume, the second highest coefficient is related to the normalized surface area, and the constant coefficient is always \(1\). More generally, for Ehrhart tensors, it has been proven that the leading coefficient of the discrete moment tensor equals the **moment tensor of rank \(r\)** which is defined as \[\operatorname{M}^r (P) \ = \ \int _P x^r \, \diff x \,.\] It is also clear that, for \(r\geq 1\), the constant coefficient vanishes identically by its \(\mathrm{GL} (\mathbb{Z}^d)\) equivariance; that is, \(\operatorname{L}_0^r(P)=\operatorname{L}^r(0P)=0\) for any \(P\in\mathcal{P}({\Z^d})\) . We give an interpretation for the second coefficient (Proposition [\[prop:secondcoeff\]](#prop:secondcoeff){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:secondcoeff"}) as the weighted sum of moment tensors over the facets of the polytope. The coefficient \(\operatorname{L}_{d-1}(P)\), specifically, was shown to be equal to one half of the sum over the normalized volumes of the facets of \(P\) by Ehrhart . We extend this statement to Ehrhart tensor polynomials by proving the following.
# \(h^r\)-tensor polynomials {#chapter:h^r}
Let \(P\) be a \(d\)-dimensional lattice polytope. Since \(\operatorname{L} ^r(nP)\) is a polynomial of degree at most \(d+r\), it can be written as a linear combination of the polynomials \({n+d+r \choose d+r}, {n+d+r-1 \choose d+r},\ldots,{n \choose d+r}\), that is, \[\label{eq:expansion} \operatorname{L}^r(nP) \ = \ h^{r}_0 (P){n+d+r \choose d+r}+h^{r}_1 (P){n+d+r-1 \choose d+r}+ \ \cdots \ + h^{r}_{d+r} (P){n \choose d+r} \,\] for some \(h^{r}_0(P),\ldots,h^{r}_{d+r}(P)\in \mathbb{T}^r\). Equivalently, in terms of generating functions, \[\label{eq:h_cone} \sum _{n\geq 0} \operatorname{L}^r (nP)t^n \ = \ \frac{h^{r}_0(P)+h^r_1(P)t+\dots+h^r_{d+r}(P)t^{d+r}}{(1-t)^{d+r+1}} \,.\] We call \(h^{r}(P)=(h^{r}_0(P),h^{r}_1(P),\ldots,h^{r}_{d+r}(P))\) the **\(h^r\)-vector**, its entries the **\(h^r\)-tensor coefficients** or **\(h^r\)-tensors** of \(P\), and \[h^{r}_P (t)\ = \ \sum _{i=0}^{d+r}h^{r}_it^i\] the **\(h^r\)-tensor polynomial** of \(P\). Observe that for \(r=0\) we obtain the usual \(h^\ast\)-polynomial and \(h^\ast\)-vector of an Ehrhart polynomial. By evaluating equation [\[eq:expansion\]](#eq:expansion){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:expansion"} at \(n=0,1\), we obtain \(h_0^{r}=0\) for \(r\geq 1\) and \(h_1^{r}=\operatorname{L}^r (P)\) for \(r\geq 0\). Inspecting the leading coefficient, we obtain \[h_1^{r}(P)+h_2^{r}(P)+\ldots+h_{d+r}^{r}(P)\ = \ (d+r)!\int_Px^r\mathrm{d}x \,.\] Applying Theorem [\[thm:tensorreciprocity\]](#thm:tensorreciprocity){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:tensorreciprocity"} and evaluating at \(n=1\), we obtain \[h^r_{d+r} (P)\ = \ \operatorname{L}^r (P^o) \,.\]
## Half-open polytopes
We will not only consider relatively open polytopes, but also **half-open polytopes**. Let \(P\) be a polytope with facets \(F_1,\ldots,F_k\) and let \(q\) be a generic point in its affine span \(\aff (P)\). Then a facet \(F_i\) is **visible** from \(q\) if \((p,q]\cap P = \emptyset\) for all \(p\in F\). If \(I_q (P)=\{i\in [k] \colon F_i \text{ is visible from }q\}\) then the point set \[H_q (P) \ = \ P\setminus \bigcup_{i \in I_q (P)} F_i\] defines a half-open polytope. In particular, \(H_q (P)=P\) for all \(q\in P\). The following result by Köppe and Verdoolaege shows that every polytope can be decomposed into half-open polytopes, and is implicitely also contained in works by Stanley and Ehrhart (see ).
The discrete moment tensor naturally can be defined for half-open polytopes by setting \[\operatorname{L}^r (H_q (P)) \ := \ \operatorname{L}^r(P)-\sum _{J\subseteq I_q(P)} (-1)^{\dim P-\dim F_J} \operatorname{L}^r (F_J) \,\] where \(F_J := \bigcap _{i \in J} F_i\). Then, from Theorem [\[thm:half-open decomposition\]](#thm:half-open decomposition){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:half-open decomposition"} and the inclusion-exclusion principle, we obtain that \[\label{eq:halfopendec} \operatorname{L}^r (P) \ = \ \operatorname{L}^r (H_q (P_1)) \ + \ \operatorname{L}^r (H_q (P_2)) \ + \ \cdots \ + \ \operatorname{L}^r (H_q (P_m)) \,\] (Compare also ).
## Half-open simplices {#sec:half-open}
Let \(S\) be a \(d\)-dimensional lattice simplex with vertices \(v_1,\ldots, v_{d+1}\). Let \(F_1,\ldots, F_{d+1}\) denote the facets of \(S\) such that \(v_i \not \in F_i\). Let \(S^{\ast}=H_q (S)\) be a \(d\)-dimensional half-open simplex and let \(I=I_q (S)\). We define the half-open polyhedral cone \[C_{S^{\ast}} \ = \ \left\{ \sum _{i=1}^{d+1} \lambda _i \bar{v}_i: \lambda _i \geq 0\text{ for }i\in[d+1],\lambda_i\neq 0 \text{ if } i\in I\right\} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d+1}\] where \(\bar{v}_i := (v_i, 1)\in\mathbb{R}^{d+1}\) for all \(1\leq i\leq d+1\). Then, by identifying hyperplanes of the form \(\{x\in \mathbb{R}^{d+1}\colon x_{d+1}=n\}\) with \(\mathbb{R}^{d}\) via \(p\colon \mathbb{R}^{d+1}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^d\) which maps \(x\mapsto (x_1,\ldots, x_d)\), we have \(C_{S^{\ast}} \cap \{x_{d+1}=n\} = nS^{\ast}\). We consider the half-open parallelepiped \[\Pi _{S^{\ast}} \ = \ \left\{ \sum _{i=1}^{d+1} \lambda _i \bar{v}_i: 0< \lambda _i \leq 1 \text{ if } i\in I, 0\leq \lambda _i <1 \text{ if } i\not\in I\right\} \,.\] Then \[C_{S^{\ast}} \ = \ \bigsqcup _{u\in \mathbb{Z}^{d+1}}\Pi _{S^{\ast}} +u_1\bar{v}_1+\cdots +u_{d+1}\bar{v}_{d+1} \,.\] Let \(S_i = \Pi _{S^{\ast}} \cap \{x_{d+1}=i\}\). Then \(S_i\) is a *partially open* hypersimplex; that is, a hypersimplex with certain facets removed. Our next result shows that \(\operatorname{L}^r (nS^{\ast})\) is given by a polynomial in \(n\) by determining its generating series. We follow the line of argumentation in . Observe that, together with equation [\[eq:halfopendec\]](#eq:halfopendec){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:halfopendec"}, this reproves the polynomiality result of \(\operatorname{L}^r(nP)\).
We remark that the results and proofs of this section immediately carry over to general translative polynomial valuations (see for a definition). In particular, Theorem [\[prop:h_cone\]](#prop:h_cone){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:h_cone"} can be generalized to give a new proof of.
# Pick-type formulas {#sec:pick}
Pick's Theorem gives an interpretation for the coefficients of the Ehrhart polynomial of a lattice polygon which establishes a relationship between the area of the polygon, the number of lattice points in the polygon and on its boundary. An analogue in higher dimensions can not exist (see, e.g., ) as it is crucial that every polygon in dimension two has a unimodular triangulation; that is, a triangulation into simplices of minimal possible area \(1/d!\). We offer interpretations for the coefficients of the Ehrhart tensor polynomial in the vector and the matrix cases by taking the route over the \(h^r\)-tensor polynomial. Given a polygon \(P\in\mathcal{P}({\Z^2})\), we will consider unimodular triangulations of \(P\) where such a triangulation will always be denoted by \(\mathcal{T}\). The triangulation will be described by the edge graph \(G=(V,E)\) of \(\mathcal{T}\) where \(V\) are the lattice points contained in \(P\) and \(E\) the edges of \(\mathcal{T}\). Furthermore, the notation \(x\) will be reserved for elements of \(V\) and \(y,z\) for endpoints of the edge \(\{y,z\}\in E\). We define \(V^o=P^o\cap\mathbb{Z}^2\), \(\partial V=\partial P\cap\mathbb{Z}^2\), \(E^o=\{\{y,z\}\in E: (y,z)\not\subset\partial P\}\), and \(\partial E=\{\{y,z\}\in E: (y,z)\subset\partial P\}\). Up to unimodular transformations, there are three types of half-open unimodular simplices in \(\mathbb{R}^2\) that we will consider; these are \(T_0\), \(T_1\), and \(T_2\) as given in Figure [\[figure:threesimplices\]](#figure:threesimplices){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:threesimplices"}.
## A Pick-type vector formula
To determine the \(h^1\)-tensors from Theorem [\[prop:h_cone\]](#prop:h_cone){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:h_cone"}, note that the Eulerian polynomial has a closed form \[\label{eq:A_j} A_j(t)\ = \ \sum_{n=0}^j\sum_{i=0}^n(-1)^i\binom{j+1}{i}(n-i)^jt^n\] (see, e.g., ). We then observe that \(A_0(t)=1\), \(A_1(t)=t\), and \(A_2(t)=t^2+t\). A comparison of coefficients of the numerator of ([\[eq:h_cone\]](#eq:h_cone){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:h_cone"}) and that in Theorem [\[prop:h_cone\]](#prop:h_cone){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:h_cone"} yields the formula \[\begin{aligned}
h_{S^{\ast}}^1(t)\ = \ \sum_{i=0}^2\operatorname{L}^1(S_i)t^{i}(1-t)+\operatorname{L}(S_i)t^{i+1}(v_1+v_2+v_3) \end{aligned}\] implying that \[\label{eq:hi_vector} h_i^1(S^{\ast})\ = \ \operatorname{L}^1(S_i)-\operatorname{L}^1(S_{i-1})+\operatorname{L}(S_{i-1})(v_1+v_2+v_3)\] for a half-open simplex \(S^{\ast}\) where \(S_i\) are defined as in Section [3.2](#sec:half-open){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:half-open"}. By Theorem [\[thm:half-open decomposition\]](#thm:half-open decomposition){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:half-open decomposition"}, any lattice polygon can be partitioned into unimodular transformations of half-open simplices. Therefore, to calculate \(h^r\)-tensors, we will need to understand the half-open parallelepipeds \(\Pi_{T_0}\), \(\Pi_{T_1}\), and \(\Pi_{T_2}\). For ease, we provide skeletal descriptions of these here. By setting \(S^{\ast}\) to \(T_0\), \(T_1\), and \(T_2\) with the vertices given in Figure [\[figure:threesimplices\]](#figure:threesimplices){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:threesimplices"}, we obtain: \[\begin{aligned}
{5}\label{eq:piped} T_0 &\: \ S_0\cap\mathbb{Z}^2=\{ 0 \};\nonumber \\ T_1 &\: \ S_1\cap\mathbb{Z}^2=\{v_1\} ;\\ T_2 &\: \ S_2\cap\mathbb{Z}^2=\{v_2+v_3\} \nonumber \end{aligned}\] where \(S_i\cap\mathbb{Z}^2=\varnothing\) for any combination of \(S_i\), \(T_j\) not given.
From Proposition [\[h\* r=1\]](#h* r=1){reference-type="ref" reference="h* r=1"}, we can deduce formulas for the Ehrhart vectors.
## A Pick-type matrix formula
We now determine the \(h^2\)-tensors in order to find a Pick-type formula for the discrete moment matrix. Similar to the vector case, by comparing coefficients of the numerator of ([\[eq:h_cone\]](#eq:h_cone){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:h_cone"}) and that in Theorem [\[prop:h_cone\]](#prop:h_cone){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:h_cone"}, we obtain the formula \[\begin{aligned}
h_{S^{\ast}}^2(t)\ = \ \sum_{i=0}^2&\operatorname{L}^2(S_i)t^i(1-t)^2+2(v_1+v_2+v_3)\operatorname{L}^1(S_i)t^{i+1}(1-t)\\ &+(v_1^2+v_2^2+v_3^2)\operatorname{L}(S_i)t^{i+1}+(v_1+v_2+v_3)^2\operatorname{L}(S_i)t^{i+2} \end{aligned}\] for a half-open simplex \(S^{\ast}\) where \(S_i\) are defined as in Section [3.2](#sec:half-open){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:half-open"}. The \(h^2\)-tensors of a half-open simplex are then found to be \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:hi_matrix} \begin{split} h_i^2(S^{\ast})\ = \ &\operatorname{L}^2(S_i)-2\operatorname{L}^2(S_{i-1})+\operatorname{L}^2(S_{i-2})+2(v_1+v_2+v_3)\left(\operatorname{L}^1(S_{i-1})-\operatorname{L}^1(S_{i-2})\right)\\ &+(v_1^2+v_2^2+v_3^2)\operatorname{L}(S_{i-1})+(v_1+v_2+v_3)^2\operatorname{L}(S_{i-2})\,. \end{split} \end{aligned}\]
From Proposition [\[h\* r=2\]](#h* r=2){reference-type="ref" reference="h* r=2"}, we can now deduce formulas for the Ehrhart matrices.
# Positivity for \(h^2\)-vectors {#sec:positivity}
A fundamental theorem in Ehrhart theory is Stanley's Nonnegativity Theorem that states that the \(h^\ast\)-vector of every lattice polytope has nonnegative entries. While positivity of real numbers is canonically defined up to sign change, there are many different choices for higher dimensional vector spaces such as \(\mathbb{T}^r\); one for every pointed cone (compare, e.g., ). An important and well-studied cone inside the vector space of symmetric matrices is the cone of positive semidefinite matrices. A matrix \(M\in \mathbb{R}^{d\times d}\) is called **positive semidefinite** if \(x^tMx\geq 0\) for all \(x\in \mathbb{R}^d\). By the identification of \(\mathbb{T}^2\) with \(\mathbb{R}^{d\times d}\), we call a tensor \(T\in \mathbb{T}^2\) **positive semidefinite** if its corresponding symmetric matrix \((T_{ij})\) is positive semidefinite. By the spectral theorem, \(T\) is a **sum of squares**; more precisely, if \(T\) has eigenvalues \(\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_d \geq 0\) and corresponding normalized eigenvectors \(u_1,\dots,u_d\) then \[(T_{ij})\ = \ \sum_{k=1}^d\lambda_ku_ku_k^t\,\] which is equivalent to \(T=\sum_{k=1}^d\lambda_ku_k^2\in \mathbb{T}^2\). Therefore, a tensor is positive semidefinite if and only if it is a sum of squares. As is the case for usual Ehrhart polynomials, the coefficients of Ehrhart tensor polynomials can be negative. However, in contrast to Ehrhart polynomials, this phenomenon appears already in dimension \(2\). For segments, it can be seen that the linear coefficient of the Ehrhart tensor polynomial is \(\sum _E (y-z)^2\). Furthermore, by and Proposition [\[prop:secondcoeff\]](#prop:secondcoeff){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:secondcoeff"}, all coefficients for line segments are positive semidefinite. The following example demonstrates negative definiteness in the plane.
Our main result is the following analogue to Stanley's Nonnegativity Theorem for the \(h^2\)-tensor polynomial of a lattice polygon.
Before proving Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}, we make a few more observations. Positive semidefiniteness of \(h^2\)-tensors is preserved under unimodular transformations since, from Equation [\[eq:expansion\]](#eq:expansion){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:expansion"} and comparing coefficients, we have \[h^r _i (\phi P)(v,v)=h^r_i (\phi^t v, \phi ^t v)\] for all \(P\in \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Z}^d)\), \(\phi \in \mathrm{GL} (\mathbb{Z}^d)\), and \(v\in \mathbb{R}^d\). However, as the next example shows, positive semidefiniteness of the \(h^2\)-vector is in general not preserved under translation.
Since Example [\[ex:counter_ex_monotonicity\]](#ex:counter_ex_monotonicity){reference-type="ref" reference="ex:counter_ex_monotonicity"} shows that \(h^2\)-tensors of half-open polytopes can be negative, it follows that \(h^2\)-tensors are not monotone with respect to inclusion in contrast to the coefficients of the \(h^\ast\)-polynomial . Therefore, techniques such as irrational decomposition or half-open decomposition that succesfully helped prove Stanley's Nonnegativity Theorem (see ) cannot immediately be applied with Theorem [\[thm:half-open decomposition\]](#thm:half-open decomposition){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:half-open decomposition"}; we will have to take a different route. To prove Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}, we decompose a lattice polygon into lattice polygons with few vertices for which the \(h^2\)-vectors can easily be calculated. For the remainder of this article, allow a lattice polygon to always mean a full-dimensional in \(\mathbb{R}^2\) although the argument is independent from the chosen ambient space. A **sparse decomposition** of \(P\in\mathcal{P}({\Z^d})\) is a finite set \(\mathcal{D}=~\{P_1,P_2,\ldots, P_m\}\) of lattice polygons such that
i) \(\operatorname{L}(P_i)\in\{3,4\}\) for each \(i\in[m]\),
ii) \(P_i \cap P_j = \emptyset\) or is a common vertex of \(P_i\) and \(P_j\) for all \(i\neq j\), and
iii) \(P\cap\mathbb{Z}^2 = \bigcup_{i=1}^m P_i\cap\mathbb{Z}^2\).
The following lemma ensures that every lattice polygon has a sparse decomposition.
We will need the following geometric observation in our proof of Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}.
We are now equipped to give the proof of our nonnegativity theorem.
# Further results and outlook {#sec:further}
It is natural to ask whether Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"} holds true in higher dimensions. Using the software package polymake we have calculated the \(h^2\)-tensor polynomials of several hundred randomly generated polytopes in dimension \(3\) and \(4\). Based on these computational results, we offer the following conjecture.
For our proof of Theorem [\[thm:main\]](#thm:main){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:main"}, it was crucial that every lattice polygon has a unimodular triangulation. Since this no longer holds true in general for higher dimensional polytopes, a proof of Conjecture [\[conj:pos\]](#conj:pos){reference-type="ref" reference="conj:pos"} would need to be conceptually different. Finding inequalities among the coefficients of the \(h^\ast\)-polynomial of a lattice polytope, beyond Stanley's Nonnegativity Theorem, is currently of great interest in Ehrhart theory. The ultimate goal is a classification of all possible \(h^\ast\)-polynomials: a classification of all \(h^\ast\)-polynomials of degree \(2\) can be found in. Another fundamental inequality is due to Hibi who proved that \(h_i(P)-h_1(P)\geq 0\) for all \(1\leq i<d\) and full-dimensional lattice polytopes that have an interior lattice point. Calculations with polymake again suggest that there might be a version for matrices motivating the following conjecture.
In recent years, additional inequalities for the coefficients of the \(h^\ast\)-polynomial have been shown (see e.g. ) which raises the question as to whether there are analogous results for Ehrhart tensors.
An answer would depend on the notion of positivity that is chosen. A natural choice for higher rank \(h^r\)-tensors, extending positive semidefiniteness of matrices, is to define \(T\in\mathbb{T}^r\) to be positive semidefinite if and only if \(T(v,\dots,v)\geq 0\) for all \(v\in\mathbb{R}^d\). However, assuming this definition of positivity, there can not be any inequalities that are valid for all polytopes if the rank \(r\) is odd since \(T(v,\ldots, v) = (-1)^rT(-v,\ldots,-v)\). In the case that \(r\) is even, we are able to extend another classical result, namely Hibi's Palindromic Theorem characterizing reflexive polytopes. A lattice polytope \(P\in \mathcal{P}(Z^d)\) is called **reflexive** if \[P = \{x\in \mathbb{R}^d \colon Ax \leq 1\}\] where \(A\in Z^{d\times d}\) is an integral matrix.
A crucial step in the proof of Theorem [\[thm:hibioriginal\]](#thm:hibioriginal){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:hibioriginal"} is to observe that a polytope \(P\) is reflexive if and only if \[nP\cap \mathbb{Z}^d =(n+1)\interior P \cap \mathbb{Z}^d\] for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\) (see ). We use this fact to give the following generalization.
Note that the proof of Proposition [\[thm:hibiext\]](#thm:hibiext){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:hibiext"} shows that for odd rank \(r\) palindromicity of the \(h^r\)-tensor polynomial of a reflexive polynomial is still necessary, but not sufficient, since all centrally symmetric polytopes have a palindromic \(h^r\)-tensor polynomial; namely the constant zero polynomial. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:06:14', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01738', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01738'} |
# Introduction
It is believed that betting house always makes money in long run irrespective of their short term loss or gain. In this paper, we make an attempt to understand this phenomenon with the concept of simple 'expectation' and 'variance' of probability theory. First, we will discuss what is **fair game**. Let's consider a simple game of English Premier League (EPL) where Manchester United (ManU) is playing against Liverpool. Suppose a betting house offers a game that if ManU wins with probability 0.606, then the player will receive \\(0.65 from the betting house. On the other hand, if ManU loses with probability 0.394 then the player has to pay \\)1 to the betting house. Now player's revenue scheme \(R_p\) is defined as follows: \[\begin{aligned}
R_{p}=\bigg\{\begin{array}{cc} 0.65 & \mbox{with probability }0.606,\\ -1 & \mbox{with probability }0.394, \end{array} \end{aligned}\] and player's expected revenue is \[E(R_p)=0.65\times 0.606-0.394=0.\] More about expectation and moments can be found in \[1,2\]. Now, we will look at the revenue scheme and expected revenue for the betting house for the same game. \[\begin{aligned}
R_{b}=\bigg\{\begin{array}{cc} -0.65 & \mbox{with probability }0.606,\\ 1 & \mbox{with probability }0.394. \end{array} \end{aligned}\] Expected revenue for betting house is, \[E(R_b)=-0.65\times 0.606 + 0.394=0.\] If we compare \(R_p\) and \(R_b\), then we can see player's loss is the gain of the betting house and vice-versa. This type of game is known as 'zero-sum' game. Also, \(E(R_b)=E(R_p)=0\) means if the player and betting house play this game several times, then 'on-average' neither betting house nor the player will make or lose money. This is called 'fair-game.' Now we know that the betting house has an establishment cost and most of the time these betting houses are the for-profit organization. Here the question is how they are making money. An easy way of doing it, if the betting house pays the player less than what they suppose to pay. That means, in the fair game, if they think to pay the player \\(0.65, but to make money, they will pay the player less than \\)0.65. For example, if they pay the player \$0.6 then the revenue scheme for the betting house is, \[\begin{aligned}
R_{b}=\bigg\{\begin{array}{cc} -0.6 & \mbox{with probability }0.606,\\ 1 & \mbox{with probability }0.394, \end{array} \end{aligned}\] and the expected revenue for betting house is, \[E(R_b)=-0.6\times 0.606 + 0.394=0.0304.\] It means if the player and betting house play this game several times, the on-average betting house will make \$0.03 or 3 cents from the player and the player will lose the same amount because it is a zero-sum game. So to earn money, in the long run, the betting house offers the player less than what is fair. Rest of the paper is organized as follows. In section [2](#sec_betting_strategy_prob_th){reference-type="ref" reference="sec_betting_strategy_prob_th"}, we present the strategy of betting houses using probability theory. In section [3](#sec_strategy_league_football_match){reference-type="ref" reference="sec_strategy_league_football_match"}, we discuss the strategy for league football match. In section [4](#sec_data_analysis){reference-type="ref" reference="sec_data_analysis"}, we presented the data analysis and showed how imputed cost of a betting house could be estimated numerically.
# Betting Strategy with Probability Theory {#sec_betting_strategy_prob_th}
In this section, we present the strategy of the betting house. Suppose \(A\) is an event with \(P(A)=p\). If \(A\) happens then, the betting house will pay \\[r\(. Otherwise, the betting house will receive \\)1. So the revenue scheme for the betting house is \]R_{b}=\bigg\{ \begin{array}{cc} -r & \mbox{with probability }p,\\ 1 & \mbox{with probability }(1-p), \end{array}\[ and the expected revenue for betting house is, \]E(R_b)=-rp+(1-p).\[ Now this game is fair game if \(E(R_b)=0\), that is \(r=\frac{1}{p}-1\), and \(\frac{1}{p}\) is known as '*decimal odds*'. The variance of the revenue scheme is generally considered as risk of a game. So for a fair game \(Var(R_b)=E(R_b^2)-[E(R_b)]^2=E(R_b^2)\). Now \]\begin{aligned}
E(R_b^2)&=& p \Big(\frac{1}{p}-1\Big)^2+ (1-p)\\ &=& (1-p)\Big[\frac{1-p}{p}+1\Big]\\ &=&\frac{1-p}{p}=\frac{1}{p}-1=r. \end{aligned}\[ Interestingly, for the fair game, \(r\) is the amount which betting house pays for each dollar they receive. It turns out that \(r\) is also the measure of risk for the same strategy as \(Var(R_b)=r\), which is known as '*fractional odds*.' To make a profit, in the long run, betting house pays \\](r-\epsilon)\(, where \)\epsilon>0$. The revenue scheme is \[R_{b}=\bigg\{ \begin{array}{cc} -\{(\frac{1}{p}-1)-\epsilon\} & \mbox{with probability }p,\\ 1 & \mbox{with probability }(1-p), \end{array}\] and the expected revenue of betting house is, \[\begin{aligned}
E(R_b)&=&-(\frac{1}{p}-1)p+\epsilon p+ (1-p)\\ &=&-(1-p)+\epsilon p + (1-p)\\ &=&\epsilon p. \end{aligned}\] After simplification \(Var(R_{b})=E(R_b^2)-[E(R_b)]^2= r(1-p\epsilon)^2\).
# Strategy for League Football Match {#sec_strategy_league_football_match}
There are three mutually exclusive outcomes in a league football match. The outcomes are (i) Hometeam win, (ii) Away team win, (iii) Draw. Let us consider the EPL match between ManU Vs. Liverpool, where ManU is Hometeam. Suppose for this match betting house calculates the probabilities 0.6, 0.15 and 0.25 for three outcomes, namely Hometeam wins, Away team wins and draw respectively. The corresponding decimal odds are \(1/0.6=1.66\), \(1/0.15=6.66\) and \(1/0.25=4.00\). In the previous section, we noticed that the betting house would never reveal these fair odds. They will always announce odds which are less than the fair value so that they can stay in profit. For instance, if the betting house offers odds of 1.57, 6.57 and 3.87 against the respective events of Hometeam wins, Away team wins and draw, then the revised revenue scheme for ManU to win the match with announced odds of 1.57 is, \[R_{b}^H=\bigg\{ \begin{array}{cc} -(1.57-1) & \mbox{with probability }0.6,\\ 1 & \mbox{with probability }0.4. \end{array}\] The expected revenue for the betting house is, \[E(R_b^H)=-0.57\times 0.6 + 0.4=0.058.\] Similarly, the revised revenue scheme for the Liverpool to win the match with announce odds of 6.57 is, \[R_{b}^A=\bigg\{ \begin{array}{cc} -(6.57-1) & \mbox{with probability }0.15,\\ 1 & \mbox{with probability }0.85, \end{array}\] and the expected revenue for betting house is, \[E(R_b^A)=-5.57\times 0.15 + 0.85=0.0145.\] Likewise, the revised revenue scheme that match will be draw with announce odds of 3.87 is, \[R_{b}^D=\bigg\{ \begin{array}{cc} -(3.87-1) & \mbox{with probability }0.25,\\ 1 & \mbox{with probability }0.75, \end{array}\] and the expected revenue for betting house is, \[E(R_b^D)=-2.87\times 0.25 + 0.75=.0325.\] Expected revenue of betting house for all events are positive. Mathematically, we can show when the announce odds are converted to probabilities; they usually add up to more than 1 to keep the house on benefit. Let us assume, \(\Big(\frac{1}{P_H}-\epsilon\Big)=\frac{1}{P_{H}^*},\) \(\Big(\frac{1}{P_A}-\epsilon\Big)=\frac{1}{P_{A}^*}\) and \(\Big(\frac{1}{P_D}-\epsilon\Big)=\frac{1}{P_{D}^*}\) Therefore, \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{1-\epsilon P_H}{P_H}=\frac{1}{P_H^*}\\ \frac{P_H}{1-\epsilon P_H}={P_H^*}\\ {P_H}<{P_H^*} \end{aligned}\] In the same way we can show \({P_A}<{P_A^*}\) and \({P_D}<{P_D^*}\). Now adding both sides we can conclude, \({P_H}+{P_A}+{P_D}<{P_H^*}+{P_A^*}+{P_D^*}\). Of course probabilities of a fair game sums up to 1 i.e. \({P_H}+{P_A}+{P_D}=1\), hence evidently \({P_H^*}+{P_A^*}+{P_D^*}>1\).
# Data Analysis {#sec_data_analysis}
Let us discuss the former analysis above with EPL data. Data is accessible on **http://www.football-data.co.uk/englandm.php**. In the table ([\[table_B365\]](#table_B365){reference-type="ref" reference="table_B365"}) we present the decimal odds of 10 different EPL matches from the popular betting house Bet365. First three columns, 'B365H', 'B365D' and 'B365A' represent the decimal odds (i.e. \(1/p\)) of three events that are (i) home team wins, (ii) draw and (iii) away team wins; from the betting house Bet365. It is visible that total probability of the three mutually exclusive events of a given match is greater than one which violates the thumb rule that probabilities add up to one. It is inevitable that sum of the probabilities will be greater than one from our results described in the previous section. However, if there are two betting houses, we can say that one house is offering better odds to the players if its sum of probabilities is closer to one. Let us consider a match held on 8th August 2015, between Bournemouth and Aston Villa where the former team is Hometeam and later one is Away team. We look at the betting houses for this match, the following table [\[table_compare_odds\]](#table_compare_odds){reference-type="ref" reference="table_compare_odds"} (for the six betting houses, namely Bet365 (B365), Bet&Win (BW), Interwetten (IW), Ladbrokes (LB), William Hill (WH), VC Bet (VC) ). Here we can compare the announce odds whichever is near to 1 that betting the house is offering fair. As per the table [\[table_compare_odds\]](#table_compare_odds){reference-type="ref" reference="table_compare_odds"}, B365 is offering fair odds compared with others. The betting house Interwetten is offering worst odds for this match.
## Imputed Cost of a Betting House
We can show different ways of calculating Imputed cost of the betting house. Here we are using additive model for the same. In this model, revenue of betting house is described as, \[R_{b}=\bigg\{ \begin{array}{cc} -\{(\frac{1}{p}-1)-\epsilon\} & \mbox{with probability }p,\\ 1 & \mbox{with probability }(1-p). \end{array}\] As discussed earlier, to make a profit, betting houses will always offer an amount which is less than what they suppose to pay. Here \(\epsilon\) is that profitable amount. Suppose the betting houses announce odds are \({P_{H}^*}\), \({P_{A}^*}\) and \({P_{D}^*}\) respectively for Hometeam, Away team and Draw of a match. These announce odds can be defined as below: \[\Big(\frac{1}{P_H}-\epsilon\Big)=\frac{1}{P_{H}^*},~~ \Big(\frac{1}{P_A}-\epsilon\Big)=\frac{1}{P_{A}^*},~~ \Big(\frac{1}{P_D}-\epsilon\Big)=\frac{1}{P_{D}^*}\] Now we all know that probabilities of three mutually exclusive events add up to 1 for fair game, i.e. \(P_{H}+P_{A}+P_{D}=1\). But \({P_{H}^*}+{P_{A}^*}+{P_{D}^*}>1\). Let us say \(\delta\) is the difference between sum of these two probabilities. Then \[\begin{aligned}
&&{P_H^*}+{P_A^*}+{P_D^*}-({P_H}+{P_A}+{P_D})=\delta\\ &\Rightarrow &{P_H^*}+{P_A^*}+{P_D^*}-(\frac {P_H^*}{1+\epsilon P_H^*}+\frac {P_A^*}{1+\epsilon P_A^*}+ \frac {P_D^*}{1+\epsilon P_D^*})=\delta\\ &\Rightarrow &{P_H^*}-\frac {P_H^*}{1+\epsilon P_H^*}+{P_A^*}-\frac {P_A^*}{1+\epsilon P_A^*}+{P_D^*}-\frac {P_D^*}{1+\epsilon P_D^*}=\delta\\ &\Rightarrow &{P_H^*}(1-\frac{1}{1+\epsilon{P_H^*}})+{P_A^*}(1-\frac{1}{1+\epsilon{P_A^*}})+{P_D^*}(1-\frac{1}{1+\epsilon {P_D^*}})=\delta\\ &\Rightarrow &\frac {\epsilon (P_H^*)^2}{1+\epsilon P_H^*} + \frac {\epsilon (P_A^*)^2}{1+\epsilon P_A^*} + \frac {\epsilon (P_D^*)^2}{1+\epsilon P_D^*}= \delta. \end{aligned}\] Clearly we can estimate \(\epsilon\) from the above equation as \({P_H^*},{P_A^*},{P_D^*}\) and \(\delta\) are already known to us. Let us solve the equation for \(\epsilon\) using the given EPL data. Considering the first match for B365 betting house where \(\{P_H^*\}=0.50\), \(\{P_A^*\}\)=0.25, \(\{P_D^*\}\)=0.28 and \(\delta\)=1.03-1=0.03. Now solving the above equation with the help of this numerical values, \[\begin{aligned}
&\epsilon(\frac {0.50^2}{1+\epsilon (0.50)} + \frac {0.25^2}{1+\epsilon (0.25)} + \frac {0.28^2}{1+\epsilon (0.28)})=0.03. \end{aligned}\] Here we can see the equation is cubic in \(\epsilon\). Instead solving analytically which is complicated, we are introducing `R` programming to optimise \(\epsilon\). Therefore calculate the value of \(\epsilon\) is 0.065 or following the revenue model we can say \$0.065 per dollar is the profitable amount for the betting house.
## Comparative study of Imputed cost among different betting houses:
Let us consider the result presented in Table ([\[table_imputed_cost\]](#table_imputed_cost){reference-type="ref" reference="table_imputed_cost"}) and figure ([\[fig_imputed_cost\]](#fig_imputed_cost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_imputed_cost"}).
1. All betting houses are limited to \$0.10 seems like there is some regulatory policy
2. For \(95\%\) of the matches B365 charges between \\(.04 to \\).06.
3. For majority games and approximately for all matches BW and IW respectively charge \$0.10.
4. Same behavior we can see for LB also.
5. But VC never charges greater than \\(.09. Moreover, for majority matches, they charge between \\).04 to \$.06.
6. B365 and VC has similar kind of behavior.
# Conclusion
In this paper, we presented how the strategy of the betting houses can be explained with the probability odds. From the real data, it is visible that for all betting houses considered here, the sum of the probability for the win, loss, and draw of a match are greater than one. We also presented how the cost of a game can be imputed numerically. Therefore, with this understanding, one realizes how the betting houses are consistently making money and accordingly decides whether to invest one's money on the betting house. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:03:40', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01625', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01625'} |
# Introduction
In this note, we want to contribute towards the extension theory of dissipative operators \(A\) of the form \(A=S+iV\), where \(S\) and \(V\geq 0\) are both symmetric but neither of them needs to be selfadjoint or essentially selfadjoint. In this sense, we will obtain a more general result than that of Crandall and Phillips, who considered dissipative operators \(A\) that were of the form[^1] \(A=S+iV\), where \(S\) is symmetric, but \(V\geq 0\) is assumed to be selfadjoint. However, we have stricter conditions on the domains of our extensions.
## Dissipative operators and extension theory
The study of non-selfadjoint operators has proven itself to be a very fruitful field of mathematical research. For an introduction into the many new phenomena and problems that arise if one gives up the condition of selfadjointness, we refer the interested reader to the classic monograph and the references therein. We mention in particular the work of Brodskii and Livšic who addressed questions such as the completeness of root vectors and introduced characteristic matrix functions and triangular models of non-selfadjoint operators. In what follows, we will call a densely defined operator \(A\) on a Hilbert space \(\mathcal{H}\) *dissipative* if and only if its numerical range is confined to the upper complex plane, i.e. if and only if \[{\mbox{Im}}\langle \psi,A\psi\rangle\geq 0\] for any \(\psi\in\mathcal{D}(A)\). Note that we have defined the sesquilinear form \(\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle\) to be antilinear in the first and linear in the second component. Moreover, we call a dissipative operator \(A\) *maximally dissipative* if it has no non-trivial dissipative operator extension, i.e. \(A\) being maximally dissipative and \(B\) being a dissipative operator extension of \(A\) implies that \(A=B\). Maximally dissipative operators possess various interesting features, e.g. they generate strongly continuous semigroups of contractions and always have a selfadjoint dilation. Thus, the theory of dissipative extensions of a given operator is an extensively studied problem (for an overview, we recommend the surveys and all the references therein). Besides the classical results of von Neumann on the theory of selfadjoint extensions of a given symmetric operator and of Kreı̆n, Birman, Vishik and Grubb on positive selfadjoint and maximally sectorial extensions of a given symmetric operator with positive numerical range, let us also mention the results of authors like Arlinskiı̆, Belyi, Derkach, Kovalev, Malamud, Mogilevskii and Tsekanovskiı̆ who have made many contributions using form methods and boundary triples in order to determine maximally sectorial and maximally accretive extensions of a given sectorial operator.[^2] Let us also mention examples, where explicit computations of maximally dissipative (resp. accretive) extensions for positive symmetric differential operators, and for sectorial Sturm-Liouville operators have been made. For the general problem of finding dissipative extensions of truly dissipative operators, Phillips showed that--via the Cayley-transform and its inverse--this is equivalent to finding contractive extensions of a non-densely defined contraction. This problem has been solved by Crandall who therefore has provided a full solution to the extension problem (note also the results in ). Crandall established that if \(C\) is a contraction defined on a closed subspace \(\mathcal{C}\) of a Hilbert space \(\mathcal{H}\) and mapping to \(\mathcal{H}\), all contractive extensions \(\widetilde{C}\) of \(C\) can be described via \[\widetilde{C}=CP_\mathcal{C}+({\mathbbm{1}}-CP_\mathcal{C}(CP_\mathcal{C})^*)^{1/2}B({\mathbbm{1}}-P_\mathcal{C})\:,\] where \(P_\mathcal{C}\) is the orthogonal projection onto \(\mathcal{C}\) and \(B\) is an arbitrary contraction on \(\mathcal{H}\). However, for concrete applications, the operators involved in this construction are often very difficult to compute. Thus, in, Crandall and Phillips made extra assumptions on the structure of the considered dissipative operator \(A\) and required that it could be written in the form \[\label{eq:crandallrequire} A=S+iV\:,\] where \(S\) is symmetric, \(V\geq 0\) is selfadjoint and \(\mathcal{D}(A)=\mathcal{D}(S)=\mathcal{D}(V)\). Let us briefly describe their approach in the next section.
## The construction of Crandall and Phillips
For the case [\[eq:crandallrequire\]](#eq:crandallrequire){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:crandallrequire"} considered by Crandall and Phillips, it follows from non-negativity and selfadjointness of \(V\) that the operator \(({\mathbbm{1}}+V)\) is a boundedly invertible bijection from \(\mathcal{D}(V)\) onto \(\mathcal{H}\). They then introduce the weighted Hilbert space \(\mathcal{H}_{+1}\) which is the linear space \(\mathcal{D}(V^{1/2})\) equipped with the inner product \(\langle f,g\rangle_{+1}:=\langle ({\mathbbm{1}}+V)^{1/2}f,({\mathbbm{1}}+V)^{1/2}g\rangle\). Using standard ideas of the construction of Gel'fand triples, they associate every element \(f\) of \(\mathcal{H}\) with an element \(\ell_f\) of the dual space \(\mathcal{H}_{+1}^*\) of \(\mathcal{H}_{+1}\) via \[\ell_f(g):=\langle f,g\rangle\quad\text{for any}\quad g\in\mathcal{H}_{+1}\:,\] which has norm equal to \[\begin{aligned}
\|\ell_f\|&=\|({\mathbbm{1}}+V)^{-1/2}f\|=:\|f\|_{-1}\:. \end{aligned}\] The space \(\mathcal{H}_{-1}\) is then obtained as the completion of \(\mathcal{H}\) in \(\mathcal{H}_{+1}^*\) with respect to \(\|\cdot\|_{-1}\). Since for any \(f\in\mathcal{D}(V^{1/2})\) and for any \(g\in\mathcal{H}\) we have that \(\|f\|\leq\|({\mathbbm{1}}+V)^{1/2}f\|=\|f\|_{+1}\) and \(\|g\|\geq \|({\mathbbm{1}}+V)^{-{1/2}}g\|=\|g\|_{-1}\), we obtain the following inclusions: \[\mathcal{H}_{+1}\subset\mathcal{H}\subset\mathcal{H}_{-1}\:.\] In particular, this implies that \(V\) is bounded as an operator from \(\mathcal{H}_{+1}\) to \(\mathcal{H}_{-1}\)---a feature which Crandall and Phillips use in order to determine all maximally dissipative extensions of \(A\) as an operator from \(\mathcal{H}_{+1}\) to \(\mathcal{H}_{-1}\). Having obtained a maximally dissipative operator \(\widehat{A}\) from \(\mathcal{H}_{+1}\) to \(\mathcal{H}_{-1}\), they then construct a dissipative extension \(\widehat{A}^0\) of \(A\) (as an operator in \(\mathcal{H}\)) via \[\begin{aligned}
\widehat{A}^0:\quad\mathcal{D}(\widehat{A}^0)=\{f\in\mathcal{D}(\widehat{A}): \widehat{A}f\in\mathcal{H}\},\quad\widehat{A}^0f:=\widehat{A}f\:. \end{aligned}\] If \(V\) is bounded, this provides a full characterization of all maximally dissipative extensions of \(A\), since the spaces \(\mathcal{H}_{+1},\mathcal{H}\) and \(\mathcal{H}_{-1}\) are equivalent in this case. For the unbounded case, this construction yields dissipative extensions of \(A\) that have domain contained in \(\mathcal{D}(V^{1/2})\), which does not always provide a full description of all maximally dissipative extensions of \(A\) (cf. ). Also, even if \(\widehat{A}\) is a maximally dissipative operator from \(\mathcal{H}_{+1}\) to \(\mathcal{H}_{-1}\), it is possible that \(\widehat{A}^0\) is not a maximally dissipative operator in \(\mathcal{H}\). However, Crandall and Phillips prove a necessary and sufficient condition for when all maximally dissipative extensions \(\widehat{A}\) from \(\mathcal{H}_{+1}\) to \(\mathcal{H}_{-1}\) induce also a maximally dissipative extension \(\widehat{A}^0\) in \(\mathcal{H}\).
## Our approach
In a previous note, we considered so called dual pairs of operators \((A,\widetilde{A})\), where \(A\) and \((-\widetilde{A})\) were assumed to be dissipative and to possess a common core, which means that there exists a linear space \(\mathcal{D}\subset\mathcal{D}(A)\cap\mathcal{D}(\widetilde{A})\) such that \(A=\overline{A\upharpoonright_\mathcal{D}}\) and \(\widetilde{A}=\overline{\widetilde{A}\upharpoonright_\mathcal{D}}\). Given \(A=S+iV\), we will define \(\widetilde{A}:=S-iV\) and show that \((A,\widetilde{A})\) is such a dual pair (with common core). We then show that considering such dual pairs is an equivalent point of view to assuming that \(A\) is of the form \(A=S+iV\) (Lemma [\[thm:ccore\]](#thm:ccore){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:ccore"}). In this sense, our results are going to be an extension of, where we gave a criterion to determine whether an extension \(\widehat{A}\) with the property that \(A\subset\widehat{A}\subset\widetilde{A}^*\) is dissipative, since we will drop the requirement that \(\widehat{A}\subset\widetilde{A}^*\), while keeping the condition that \(\mathcal{D}(\widehat{A})\subset\mathcal{D}(\widetilde{A}^*)\), i.e. the restrictions on the domain of \(\widehat{A}\) remain but the action of the extensions \(\widehat{A}\) may differ from that of \(\widetilde{A}^*\). As it turns out, the square-roots of the selfadjoint Friedrichs and Kreı̆n-von Neumann extensions of \(V\)--denoted by \(V_F^{1/2}\), respectively by \(V_K^{1/2}\), will play an important part in the presentation of our main result (Theorem [\[thm:alter\]](#thm:alter){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:alter"}). In particular, we will single out three cases in which it will be possible to simplify the result of Theorem [\[thm:alter\]](#thm:alter){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:alter"} and express the necessary and sufficient condition for an extension \(\widehat{A}\) to be dissipative in terms that only involve \(V_F^{1/2}\) and \(V_K^{1/2}\) in terms of the quadratic forms \(\psi\mapsto\|V_*^{1/2}\psi\|^2\), where \(*\in\{F,K\}\)--a feature which makes it accessible to direct calculation. These three cases are given by (i) an additional restriction on the action of \(\widehat{A}\), (ii) \(V\geq \varepsilon > 0\), and (iii) \(V\) has only one non-negative selfadjoint extension (i.e. \(V_F=V_K\)). We will also discuss the interplay between boundary conditions (determined by the choice of \(\mathcal{D}(\widehat{A})\)) and the "deviation\" of \(\widehat{A}\) from being a "proper\" extension of \((A,\widetilde{A})\)--(determined by \((\widetilde{A}^*-\widehat{A})\upharpoonright_{\mathcal{D}(\widehat{A})}\)). We will show that there is a fundamentally different behavior between the case that \(V\) has only one non-negative selfadjoint extension \(V_F=V_K\) (Corollary [\[coro:ausmachen\]](#coro:ausmachen){reference-type="ref" reference="coro:ausmachen"}) and the case that \(V_F\neq V_K\) (Example [\[ex:1493\]](#ex:1493){reference-type="ref" reference="ex:1493"}).
# Some definitions and previous results
We start with a few basic definitions and results on dissipative operators. Firstly, let us state a lemma on by how many linearly independent vectors the domain of a given closed dissipative operator with finite defect index has to increase in order to obtain a maximally dissipative extension.
Next, let us introduce some convenient notation for complementary subspaces:
Finally, we will need the characterization of the Kreı̆n-von Neumann extension of a given non-negative symmetric operator \(V\), which has been shown by Ando and Nishio.
For our purposes, it will be more convenient to use the following characterization of \(\mathcal{D}(V_K^{1/2})\) and \(\|V_K^{1/2}h\|\):
# The common core property
Given any bounded operator \(A\), the decomposition into its selfadjoint real part \(S:=(A+A^*)/2\) and selfadjoint imaginary part \(V:=(A-A^*)/(2i)\) allows us to always write \(A\) as \(A=S+iV\). For the unbounded case, this is generally not possible as one has to be careful with the domains. However, in the case that it is possible to decompose \(A\) as \[\label{eq:decomp} A=S+iV\:,\] where both \(S\) and \(V\geq 0\) are symmetric and \(\mathcal{D}(A)=\mathcal{D}(S)= \mathcal{D}(V)\), one can use the framework of dual pairs \((A,\widetilde{A})\) of operators to decompose \(A\) analogously as in the bounded case. To this end, let us firstly recall their definition (see also for more details):
It is then not hard to see that with the choice \(\widetilde{A}:=S-iV\) (\(\mathcal{D}(\widetilde{A})=\mathcal{D}(S)=\mathcal{D}(V)\)), we have that \((A,\widetilde{A})\) is a dual pair since \[\label{eq:kirchedorf} \langle f,\widetilde{A}g\rangle=\langle f, (S-iV)g\rangle=\langle (S+iV)f,g\rangle=\langle Af,g\rangle\] for any \(f\in\mathcal{D}(S+iV)\) and any \(g\in\mathcal{D}(S-iV)\). For the presentation of our results in, the notion of dual pairs \((A,\widetilde{A})\) satisfying the so called common core property was particularly useful. Let us restate the definition.
We are now prepared to show the link between dual pairs \((A,\widetilde{A})\) satisfying the common core property and dissipative operators \(A\) that can be decomposed according to [\[eq:decomp\]](#eq:decomp){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:decomp"}.
# The main result
We are now prepared to prove our main result. Before we proceed, we need to show the following two lemmas:
Given a dual pair \((A,\widetilde{A})\), let us introduce the following convenient way of parametrizing all extensions of \(A\) which have domain contained in \(\mathcal{D}(\widetilde{A}^*)\):
Note that the operator \(\mathcal{L}\) can be interpreted as the deviation of \(A_{\mathcal{L,V}}\) from \(\widetilde{A}^*\), since for any \(v\in\mathcal{V}\), we get that \[(\widetilde{A}^*-A_{\mathcal{V,L}})v=\mathcal{L}v\:.\] Let us now show the main theorem:
Note that for the proof of Theorem [\[thm:alter\]](#thm:alter){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:alter"}, we have assumed that \[v\in\mathcal{D}(V_K^{1/2}) \qquad\text{and}\qquad \mathcal{L}v\in \text{\emph{ran}}(V_F^{1/2})=\mathcal{D}(V_F^{-1/2})\:.\] Let us now show that given either condition, the other is necessary for (we will comment on the case that neither condition is satisfied after the proof of the following theorem).
# Applications of the main theorem
Despite its theoretical merit, Theorem [\[thm:alter\]](#thm:alter){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:alter"} does not seem to be very useful for practical applications, since it is in general very difficult to explicitly compute the square-roots \(V_K^{1/2}\) and \(V_F^{-1/2}\) as they occur in the statement of the theorem. Moreover, we do not have explicit knowledge of the partial isometry \(\mathcal{U}\). In this section, we are therefore going to single out three situations in which Condition [\[eq:gstinkert\]](#eq:gstinkert){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:gstinkert"} can be simplified and made accessible to direct computations.
## An additional restriction on \({\mbox{ran}}(\mathcal{L})\) {#subsec:additionalreq}
For the statement of Theorem [\[thm:alter\]](#thm:alter){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:alter"}, we have assumed that \({\mbox{ran}}(\mathcal{L})\subset{\mbox{ran}}(V_F^{1/2})\). If we make the even stricter assumption that \({\mbox{ran}}(\mathcal{L})\subset{\mbox{ran}}(V_F)\), we can simplify the result of Theorem [\[thm:alter\]](#thm:alter){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:alter"}:
## The strictly positive case {#subsec:strictly}
Next, let us consider the case when the imaginary part \(V\) is strictly positive, i.e. when there exists a positive number \(\varepsilon>0\) such that \(\langle f,Vf\rangle\geq \varepsilon\|f\|^2\) for all \(f\in\mathcal{D}(V)\). We introduce the notation \(V\geq\varepsilon>0\) in this case.
## The case of coinciding Friedrichs and Kreı̆n-von Neumann extension {#subsec:essentials}
Let us now consider the case that the Friedrichs and Kreı̆n-von Neumann extensions of \(V\) coincide: \(V_F=V_K=:\widehat{V}\). Before we simplify Theorem [\[thm:alter\]](#thm:alter){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:alter"} with the help of this extra assumption, let us prove that in this case, both conditions, \(\mathcal{V}\subset\mathcal{D}(\widehat{V}^{1/2})\) and \({\mbox{ran}}(\mathcal{L})\subset{\mbox{ran}}( \widehat{V}^{1/2})\) are *independently* necessary for \(A_{\mathcal{V,L}}\) to be dissipative.
Let us now simplify Theorem [\[thm:alter\]](#thm:alter){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:alter"} for the case that the Friedrichs and Kreı̆n-von Neumann extension \(V_F\) and \(V_K\) of \(V\) coincide: \(V_F=V_K=:\widehat{V}\). Note that the situation of \(V\) being essentially selfadjoint is a special case of this. We also want to show that \(A_{\mathcal{V,L}}\) can only be dissipative if \(A_{\mathcal{V}}\) already is, i.e. there necessarily needs to be a dissipative boundary condition--described by a suitable choice of \(\mathcal{V}\)--before one can consider deviations from the action of \(\widetilde{A}^*\) via non-zero operators \(\mathcal{L}\). This is fundamentally different to the case \(V_F\neq V_K\), where we have found an example of an extension \(A_{\mathcal{V,L}}\), which was dissipative while \(A_\mathcal{V}\) was not (Example [\[ex:1493\]](#ex:1493){reference-type="ref" reference="ex:1493"}).
Next, let us show that for *any* dissipative extension of \(S+iV\), it is necessary that its domain is contained in \(\mathcal{D}(S^*)\). Since \(V\) is assumed to be bounded, note that \(A=S+iV\) is closed if and only if \(S\) is closed. Also note that we are describing general extensions of \(A\) that need *not* be of the form \(\widehat{S}+iV\), where \(\widehat{S}\) is a symmetric extension of \(S\).
We are now able to describe all dissipative extensions of \(A=S+iV\):
Let us now investigate the relation between the choice of \(\mathcal{V}\) and \(\mathcal{L}\): | {'timestamp': '2018-01-24T02:01:01', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01904', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01904'} |
#
# Introduction
The celebrated singularity theorems in general relativity suggest that the complete description of a black hole requires a quantum theory of gravity that can treat singularities in a consistent manner. One would expect that singularities in classical general relativity are cured by quantum gravity in much the same way that the classical singularity is resolved in a simplified model of the quantized hydrogen atom. This suggests a number of natural questions about properties of quantum black holes, such as their mass spectrum and interior structure, that are related to the end state of Hawking radiation. Apart from the important theoretical issues it raises, black-hole evaporation provides one of the few possible ultra-high-energetic astrophysical events that might one day be used to test a given quantum theory of gravity. Unfortunately, we do not as yet have a complete quantum theory of gravity to provide us with precise answers to such questions. Suggestive results may none the less be obtained using a midi-superspace approach in which one quantizes only a restricted class of highly symmetric spacetimes . There are two different canonical methods for quantizing general relativity as a constrained dynamical system: Dirac quantization and reduced phase-space quantization. In the former method, the constraints in the Einstein field equations become operators acting on the wave function(al) of spacetime. The resulting Wheeler-DeWitt equation provides the basis for Dirac quantized gravity. In reduced phase-space quantization, on the other hand, one first chooses a gauge, solves the classical constraint equations, and then puts the solutions to the constraints and gauge fixing conditions back into the action, which is then quantized on the resulting reduced phase space. One variation of this approach is to first do a suitable canonical transformation to a set of phase space coordinates that separate out the gauge invariant modes and decouple them from the modes that are "pure gauge\". The gauge fixing procedure then becomes straightforward. This is the approach that we take in the following. Although reduced phase-space quantization is a very natural way to quantize constrained dynamical systems, it is technically hopeless to implement with full generality in Einstein's theory. It is nonetheless possible, and highly instructive, to carry out the reduced phase-space quantization of spherically symmetric vacuum spacetimes . Classically, the Birkhoff theorem guarantees that the Schwarzschild solution is the unique one-parameter family of solutions in this system. Following Kuchař , we take the Misner-Sharp quasi-local mass \(M\) , the areal radius \({R}\), and their conjugate momenta, \(P_M\) and \(P_R\), respectively, as canonical variables. The resulting constraint equations are trivial to solve: \({M}={\bf m}(t)\) is independent of the spatial coordinate, and \(P_R= 0\) on the constraint equations. In particular, they solve the constraint equations, resulting in a two-dimensional reduced phase space. The resulting reduced action is simply \[\begin{aligned}
I[{\bf m},{\bf p}]=\int {\rm d} t \biggl({\bf p}(t) \dot{{\bf m}}(t)-(N_+-N_-){\bf m}(t)\biggl), \label{intro} \end{aligned}\] where a dot denotes a derivative with respect to \(t\) . Here the dynamical variable is the spatially constant mode \({\bf m}(t)\) of the Misner-Sharp mass; i.e., its value on the constraint surface. Its conjugate momentum \({\bf p}\) is the Schwarzschild time separation between the two ends of the spatial slices at fixed time \(t\), and the Hamiltonian is the mass \({\bf m}\) itself . The prescribed functions \(N_\pm(t)\) are the values of the lapse at either end of the spatial slice and are not varied. The Hamilton equation for \({\bf m}\) is simply \({\dot {\bf m}}=0\), which requires the spatially constant mode of the Misner-Sharp mass, \({\bf m}\), to be constant in time as well. This Kuchař reduction has been generalized in arbitrary dimensional spacetime with spherical, plane, or hyperbolic symmetry in the presence of a cosmological constant , and also in vacuum spherically symmetric Lovelock gravity , the most general metric theory of gravity yielding second-order field equations in arbitrary dimensions . The Kuchař action ([\[intro\]](#intro){reference-type="ref" reference="intro"}) in fact provides a firm geometrical foundation for studying the quantum mechanics of the Schwarzschild-Tangherlini-type vacuum black holes in any theory admitting a Birkhoff's theorem. Based in part on Kuchař' work, Louko and Mäkelä pioneered the method of throat quantization of the Schwarzschild black hole . They performed a canonical transformation from the Kuchař action ([\[intro\]](#intro){reference-type="ref" reference="intro"}) with \(N_+=1\) and \(N_-=0\) to a new action that describes the dynamics of the radius of the wormhole throat on a maximal slicing of the maximally extended Schwarzschild black-hole spacetime. While \(t\) is interpreted in the new action as the proper time on the wormhole throat, as pointed out by Louko and Mäkelä, one can choose the slicings so that \(t\) is equal to the proper time in one of the asymptotically flat regions in the Schwarzschild spacetime. Because the Hamiltonian for the throat dynamics is the Misner-Sharp mass, they quantized this system and identified its energy eigenvalues as mass eigenvalues of the Schwarzschild black hole . In a previous paper , we generalized results of Ref. to arbitrary-dimensional vacuum black holes with spherical, planar, or hyperbolic symmetry, with or without a cosmological constant. As in standard quantum mechanics, there are ambiguities in the choice of the operator ordering and boundary conditions. In our study, we adopted Laplace-Beltrami operator ordering as a natural choice and imposed boundary conditions that preserve unitarity. As expected, we obtained discrete mass spectra for Schwarzschild-Tangherlini-type black holes in the stationary state . While the spectrum was obtained in the WKB approximation in most of the cases, we obtained an exact mass spectrum with a positive lower bound for asymptotically AdS toroidal black holes. This exact spectrum was bounded below by a positive Planck scale number, suggesting that the final state after the Hawking radiation of a toroidal black hole in a system with less symmetry would also be a Planck mass relic. In quantum mechanics, it is natural to expect that an isolated system settles down to a stationary state in the far future due to dissipation of energy to the surroundings. Nonetheless, for suitably isolated systems, non-stationary exact quantum states also can have physical relevance. The coherent states of the simple harmonic oscillator are a prime example. In quantum gravity, which is as yet not well understood at a fundamental level, the study of such exact dynamical states is particularly useful because it may shed insight into the expected semi-classical behaviour. One key difference between the stationary and non-stationary states is that, while the expectation value of the mass is constant for both, mass uncertainty exists only in the non-stationary case. This raises the following questions:
- How does the mass uncertainty change in time?
- Does it have a maximum or minimum value?
- How do we define the horizon of a quantum black hole in the dynamical case?
- Once defined, how large are the fluctuations of the quantum horizon, and how far from the classical value is it located?
- In the large-mass limit, do the quantum and classical horizons coincide, and do the quantum fluctuations become small?
We will address these questions in the framework of throat quantization of toroidal AdS black holes using two families of exact time-dependent wave functions. One interesting result is that for highly non-stationary states of large-mass black holes, quantum fluctuations are not negligible in one family, while they are greatly suppressed in the other. Such states therefore provide candidates for describing the dynamics of semi-classical black holes. The outline of the present paper is as follows. In Sec. [3](#sec:throat){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:throat"}, we review the throat quantization method and summarize our previous results for stationary states. We also introduce the concepts of classical and quantum horizons as well as the semi-classical limit. In Sec. [4](#sec:wave){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:wave"} the wave functions for the toroidal black hole are presented. In Secs. [5](#sec:exact1){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:exact1"} and [6](#sec:exact2){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:exact2"}, we study the properties of quantum toroidal black holes described by two distinct families of wave functions. Our conclusions and discussions are summarized in Sec. [7](#sec:summary){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:summary"}. Integral formulae involving Hermite polynomials that are used in the main text are given in Appendix A, while the details of computations are presented in Appendices B and C. Our basic notation follows . The convention for the Riemann curvature tensor is \([\nabla _\rho ,\nabla_\sigma]V^\mu ={R^\mu }_{\nu\rho\sigma}V^\nu\) and \(R_{\mu \nu }={R^\rho }_{\mu \rho \nu }\). The Minkowski metric is taken as diag\((-,+,\cdots,+)\), and Greek indices run over all spacetime indices. We use a symbol \(\kappa_n:=\sqrt{8\pi G_n}\), where \(G_n\) is the \(n\)-dimensional Newton constant. The Planck length and the Planck mass are defined by \(\ell_{\rm p}:=(\hbar\kappa_n^2/c^3)^{1/(n-2)}\) and \(m_{\rm p}:=(\hbar^{n-3}/\kappa_n^2c^{n-5})^{1/(n-2)}\), respectively. We will use the Planck area and the Planck volume defined by \(A_{\rm p}:=V_{n-2}^{(0)}\ell_{\rm p}^{n-2}\) and \(V_{\rm p}:=V_{n-2}^{(0)}\ell_{\rm p}^{n-1}/(n-1)\), respectively, where \(V_{n-2}^{(0)}\) represents volume of the \((n-2)\)-dimensional subspace with toroidal symmetry. Here we have kept the speed of light \(c\) explicitly, but in the main text we set \(c=1\). In these units, we have \(\hbar\kappa_n^2=\ell_{\rm p}^{n-2}\) and \(\hbar=m_{\rm p}\ell_{\rm p}\).
# Throat quantization of vacuum symmetric black holes {#sec:throat}
## Preliminaries
We consider general relativity with a cosmological constant \(\Lambda\) in arbitrary \(n(\ge 3)\) dimensions. The action is given by \[\begin{aligned}
I=&\frac{1}{2\kappa_n^2}\int {\rm d} ^nx\sqrt{-g}(R-2\Lambda)+I_{\partial{\cal M}},\label{action} \end{aligned}\] where \(I_{\partial{\cal M}}\) is the York-Gibbons-Hawking boundary term. The above action gives the following vacuum Einstein field equations: \[\begin{aligned}
R_{\mu\nu}-\frac12 g_{\mu\nu}R+\Lambda g_{\mu\nu}=0. \label{beqL} \end{aligned}\] We assume an \(n\)-dimensional warped product spacetime \(({\cal M}^n,g_{\mu\nu}) \approx ({M}^2,g_{AB})\times ({K}^{n-2},\gamma_{ab})\), of which the most general metric is given by \[\begin{aligned}
g_{\mu\nu}(x){\rm d} x^\mu {\rm d} x^\nu=g_{AB}({\bar y}){\rm d} {\bar y}^A {\rm d} {\bar y}^B+r({\bar y})^2\gamma_{ab}(z){\rm d} z^a{\rm d} z^b, \label{eq:structure} \end{aligned}\] where indices run as \(A,B=0,1\) and \(a,b=2,3,\cdots,n-1\). Here \(({M}^2,g_{AB})\) is the most general two-dimensional Lorentzian manifold, and \(({K}^{n-2},\gamma_{ab})\) is the \((n-2)\)-dimensional maximally symmetric space with its curvature \(k=1, 0,-1\); namely, the Riemann tensor \({}^{(n-2)}R^{ab}_{~~cd}\) on \(({K}^{n-2},\gamma_{ab})\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
{}^{(n-2)}R^{ab}_{~~cd}=k(\delta^a_c \delta^b_d-\delta^a_d \delta^b_c). \end{aligned}\] Note that, in three dimensions, \(({K}^{n-2},\gamma_{ab})\) is one-dimensional and \(k=0\) necessarily holds. We assume that \(({K}^{n-2},\gamma_{ab})\) is compact. \(r({\bar y})\) is a scalar on \(({M}^2,g_{AB})\), called the areal radius because \(r^{n-2}\) is proportional to the area of a symmetric \((n-2)\)-surface generated by the spatial Killing vectors on \(({K}^{n-2},\gamma_{ab})\). The generalized Misner-Sharp quasi-local mass in this system is defined by \[\begin{aligned}
M:=& \frac{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}}{2\kappa_n^2}r^{n-3}\biggl(\frac{r^2}{l^2}+(k-(Dr)^2)\biggl),\label{qlm} \end{aligned}\] where \(D_A\) is the covariant derivative on \(({M}^2,g_{AB})\), \((Dr)^2:=(D_A r)(D^A r)\), and the AdS radius \(l\) is defined by \[\begin{aligned}
l^2:=&-\frac{(n-1)(n-2)}{2\Lambda}. \label{lambdatil} \end{aligned}\] The constant \(V_{n-2}^{(k)}\) represents the volume of \(({K}^{n-2},\gamma_{ab})\). \(M\) reduces to the ADM mass at spacelike infinity in the asymptotically flat spacetime .
## Throat dynamics of vacuum black holes {#sec:ClassicalThroatDynamics}
In the vacuum case, the Einstein equations show that the mass function \(M\) is constant. Then, in the case of \(k\Lambda \le 0\), the general vacuum solution is the following generalized Schwarzschild-Tangherlini solution: \[\begin{aligned}
{\rm d} s^2=&-f(r){\rm d} t^2+f(r)^{-1}{\rm d} r^2+r^2\gamma_{ab}{\rm d} z^a {\rm d} z^b, \label{f-vacuum} \\ f(r) =&k-\frac{2\kappa_n^2M}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}r^{n-3}}+\frac{r^2}{l^2}. \end{aligned}\] For \(k\Lambda > 0\), by contrast, the general vacuum solution consists of the solution ([\[f-vacuum\]](#f-vacuum){reference-type="ref" reference="f-vacuum"}) and the Nariai (\(k=1\)) or anti-Nariai (\(k=-1\)) direct product solution in which the areal radius \(r\) is constant. In the generalized Schwarzschild-Tangherlini spacetime ([\[f-vacuum\]](#f-vacuum){reference-type="ref" reference="f-vacuum"}), there is a central curvature singularity at \(r=0\) and a Killing horizon located at \(r=r_{\rm h}\) such that \(f(r_{\rm h})=0\). Hence, the mass-horizon relation is given by \[\begin{aligned}
M=\frac{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}r_{\rm h}^{n-3}}{2\kappa_n^2}\biggl(k+\frac{r_{\rm h}^2}{l^2}\biggl). \label{mass-horizon} \end{aligned}\] The Penrose diagrams for the generalized Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black hole ([\[f-vacuum\]](#f-vacuum){reference-type="ref" reference="f-vacuum"}) with a single horizon are drawn in Fig. [\[SingleBH\]](#SingleBH){reference-type="ref" reference="SingleBH"}. (The black hole does not possess multiple horizons in the case of \(k=1\) or \(k=0\).) The maximally extended black-hole spacetime drawn in Fig. [\[SingleBH\]](#SingleBH){reference-type="ref" reference="SingleBH"} has the structure of a wormhole whose throat is located inside the event horizon \(r=r_{\rm h}\). The areal radius of this wormhole throat evolves with time. We represent it by \(r=a(\tau)\), where \(\tau\) is the proper time on the throat. Its time evolution is generated by the following Hamiltonian \(H[a(\tau),p_a(\tau)]\): \[\begin{aligned}
H=&\frac{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}a^{n-3}}{2\kappa_n^2}\biggl\{\biggl(\frac{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}}{\kappa_n^2}\biggl)^{-2}p_a^2a^{-2(n-3)}+k+\frac{a^2}{l^2}\biggl\}, \label{hamiltonian} \end{aligned}\] where \(p_a\) is the momentum conjugate of \(a\). The behaviour of the throat radius as described by the resulting solutions \(a(\tau)\) is as follows: the throat radius starts to increase from the white-hole singularity at \(a=0\) until it reaches its turning point at the bifurcation \((n-2)\)-surface \(a=r_{\rm h}\). The throat radius then decreases from its maximum value \(a=r_{\rm h}\), and finally reaches the black-hole singularity at \(a=0\). The maximum value \(r_{\rm h}\) of \(a\) coincides with the horizon radius for any given value of \(M\). Since the horizon radius as given in Eq. ([\[mass-horizon\]](#mass-horizon){reference-type="ref" reference="mass-horizon"}) increases indefinitely as \(M\) increases, the domain of \(a\) is \(0\le a <\infty\), while the domain of \(p_a\) is \(-\infty<p_a<\infty\). Incidentally, this provides a fundamental motivation for quantization using throat variables, rather than the Misner-Sharp mass, as done by Kuchař. As described above, the physics prescribes the range of the phase-space variables \(a\) and \(p_a\), which in turn determine the spectrum of the energy. If one tries to quantize the energy directly, its conjugate variable is effectively time, which presumably is a continuous variable in \((-\infty,+\infty)\), so that one would naturally obtain a continuous spectrum of plane wave solutions with mass unbounded below. In this context, a continuous spectrum \((-\infty,+\infty)\) for the mass \(M\) is natural also, because the Kuchař reduced action ([\[intro\]](#intro){reference-type="ref" reference="intro"}) does not retain any information about the fact that the spacetime is that of a black hole. Moreover, if one tries to restrict the range of \(M\) to \({\mathbb R}^+\), then as with a free particle on the half line, its conjugate would not exist as a self-adjoint operator. A fundamental feature of throat quantization is that, as shown for Schwarzschild black holes in Ref. , the corresponding Hamiltonian ([\[hamiltonian\]](#hamiltonian){reference-type="ref" reference="hamiltonian"}) can be obtained by a canonical transformation from the Kuchař action ([\[intro\]](#intro){reference-type="ref" reference="intro"}) with \(N_+=1\) and \(N_-=0\), in which the Hamiltonian is the mass \(M\) of the black hole and the time \(t\) coincides with the proper time \(\tau\) of an observer at rest on the throat of the wormhole. One then quantizes the throat dynamics, whose action is given by \[\begin{aligned}
I=\int {\rm d} t\biggl(p_a{\dot a}-H[a,p_a]\biggl). \label{newaction} \end{aligned}\] We emphasize that \(t\) in the new action ([\[newaction\]](#newaction){reference-type="ref" reference="newaction"}) is originally the Kuchař' asymptotic time variable, which is the proper time of an observer at spacelike infinity in the spacetime ([\[f-vacuum\]](#f-vacuum){reference-type="ref" reference="f-vacuum"}), so the expectation values of physical quantities are those measured by such an observer. The existence of such a canonical transformation provides the required connection between the throat variables and the geometrodynamics of the full diffeomorphism invariant spacetime that underlies the Kuchař action.
## Hamiltonian operator
We now proceed to quantize ([\[newaction\]](#newaction){reference-type="ref" reference="newaction"}) using Schrödinger quantization. Replacing \(p_a\) in the Hamiltonian ([\[hamiltonian\]](#hamiltonian){reference-type="ref" reference="hamiltonian"}) by \({\hat p}_a=-i\hbar \partial/\partial a\), we obtain the Schrödinger equation for the wave function \(\Psi(t,a)\): \[\begin{aligned}
{\hat H}\Psi =i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t}. \label{Schro} \end{aligned}\] Adopting Laplace-Beltrami operator ordering , we obtain the following Hamiltonian operator : \[\begin{aligned}
{\hat H} =&\frac{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}}{2\kappa_n^2}\biggl\{\frac{a^{n-1}}{l^2}+ka^{n-3}-\biggl(\frac{\kappa_n^2}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}}\biggl)^2\frac{\hbar^2}{a^{(n-3)/2}}\frac{\partial}{\partial a}\biggl(\frac{1}{a^{(n-3)/2}}\frac{\partial }{\partial a}\biggl)\biggl\}. \label{H_LB} \end{aligned}\] This operator is Hermitian symmetric with respect to the inner product defined by \[\begin{aligned}
\langle \Psi|\Phi\rangle:=\int^\infty_0\Psi^*\Phi\mu(a){\rm d} a. \end{aligned}\] for two arbitrary wave functions \(\Psi\) and \(\Phi\), with measure \(\mu(a)=a^{(n-3)/2}\). Louko and Mäkelä considered the more general measure \(\mu(a) = a^\beta\) , and corresponding Hermitian ordering of the momentum term in the Hamiltonian. Defining \(x:=a^{(n-1)/2}\), we rewrite \({\hat H}\) as \[\begin{aligned}
{\hat H} =&\frac{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}}{2\kappa_n^2}\biggl\{\frac{x^2}{l^2}+kx^{2(n-3)/(n-1)}-\hbar^2\biggl(\frac{(n-1)\kappa_n^2}{2(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}}\biggl)^2\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}\biggl\}. \label{H-x} \end{aligned}\] Note that \(x^2 = a^{n-1}\) is proportional to the Euclidean (or special relativistic) volume of a throat with radius \(a\). Comparing Eq. ([\[Schro\]](#Schro){reference-type="ref" reference="Schro"}) with \[\begin{aligned}
\biggl(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}+V(x)\biggl)\psi=i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t}, \label{Schro-eq} \end{aligned}\] we identify the effective mass and potential as \[\begin{aligned}
V(x)\equiv &\frac{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}}{2\kappa_n^2}\biggl(\frac{x^2}{l^2}+kx^{2(n-3)/(n-1)}\biggl),\label{p-potential}\\ m\equiv &\frac{4(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(k)}}{(n-1)^2\kappa_n^2}. \label{p-mass} \end{aligned}\] In terms of \(x\), the inner product becomes simple: \[\begin{aligned}
\langle \Psi|\Phi\rangle:=\int^\infty_0\Psi^*\Phi{\rm d}{x}. \end{aligned}\] It is important to note that since the exponent in the second term of ([\[p-potential\]](#p-potential){reference-type="ref" reference="p-potential"}) is less than 2 for all values of \(n\), the potential \(V(x)\) is bounded below for \(k=-1\) with \(\Lambda<0\).
## Self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian operator
We require the quantum system to obey unitarity: \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{{\rm d}}{{\rm d} t}\langle \Psi|\Phi\rangle=0\. \end{aligned}\] This requires the Hamiltonian operator \({\hat H}\) to be self-adjoint on the domain of \(0 \le x<\infty\) or to have a self-adjoint extension, which guarantees reality of the eigenvalues. In our previous paper , we showed that the Hamiltonian operator ([\[H-x\]](#H-x){reference-type="ref" reference="H-x"}) on the half line \(x\in [0,\infty)\) admits an infinite number of self-adjoint extensions. We now summarize the arguments that lead to this conclusion. (See Ref. for general discussions of self-adjoint extensions of operators.) Starting with Eqs. ([\[Schro\]](#Schro){reference-type="ref" reference="Schro"}) and ([\[H-x\]](#H-x){reference-type="ref" reference="H-x"}) and integrating by parts with fall-off condition \(\Psi\to 0\) as \(x\to \infty\), one obtains \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{{\rm d}}{{\rm d} t}\langle \Psi|\Phi\rangle=\frac{i\hbar}{2m} \biggl(\frac{\partial\Psi^*}{\partial x}\Phi-\Psi^*\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial x}\biggl)\biggl|_{x=0}. \end{aligned}\] The right-hand side of the above equation must vanish for all states in the Hilbert space in order to ensure unitarity of the system. Thus, the wave functions must obey the following boundary condition: \[\begin{aligned}
\Psi(t,0)+L\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x}(t,0)=0, \label{eq:robin bc} \end{aligned}\] where \(L\) is a real constant. \(L=0\) and \(L=\infty\) correspond to Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions, respectively. The remaining values of \(L\) correspond to Robin boundary conditions . Since one obtains inequivalent but well-defined quantum theories for different real values of \(L\), the Hamiltonian operator ([\[H-x\]](#H-x){reference-type="ref" reference="H-x"}) on the half line \(x\in [0,\infty)\) admits an infinite number of self-adjoint extensions. We note that in the case of quantization on the whole line \(x\in (-\infty,\infty)\), Ehrenfest's theorem holds; \[\begin{aligned}
m\frac{{\rm d}^2\langle x\rangle}{{\rm d} t^2}=-\biggl\langle \frac{{\rm d} V}{{\rm d} x}\biggl\rangle, \end{aligned}\] so that \(\langle x\rangle\) follows quantum corrected classical orbits (since \(\langle \frac{{\rm d} V}{{\rm d} x}\rangle\neq \left.\frac{{\rm d} V}{{\rm d} x}\right|_{x=\langle x\rangle}\)). The above equation is modified in the case of the half-line \(x\in [0,\infty)\). Under the assumption that the surface terms at infinity vanish, and again using the Schrödinger equation ([\[Schro-eq\]](#Schro-eq){reference-type="ref" reference="Schro-eq"}) and integration by parts, we obtain \[\begin{aligned}
m\frac{{\rm d}^2\langle x\rangle}{{\rm d} t^2}=&-\frac{\hbar^2}{4m} \biggl(\frac{\partial^2\Psi^*}{\partial x^2}\Psi+\Psi^*\frac{\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2}-2\frac{\partial\Psi^*}{\partial x}\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x}\biggl)\biggl|_{x=0}-\biggl\langle \frac{{\rm d} V}{{\rm d} x}\biggl\rangle. \end{aligned}\] Therefore, in general, the expectation value of \(x\) does not follow classical orbits due to possible boundary effects[^1]. (See Ref. for the case of \(\langle x^q\rangle\), where \(q\) is a positive constant.) We note, however, that for \(q=2\), one has \[\begin{aligned}
m\frac{{\rm d}^2\langle x^2\rangle}{{\rm d} t^2}=& \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \biggl\{x\biggl( \frac{\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2}\Psi + \Psi^* \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} \biggl)-2\biggl(\frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial x}\Psi + \Psi^*\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x}\biggl)\biggl\}\biggl|_{x=0}\nonumber\\ & + \int^\infty_0 {\rm d} x\biggl(\frac{2\hbar^2}{m} \frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial x}\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} -2 x \Psi^* \frac{{\rm d} V}{{\rm d} x}\Psi\biggl). \end{aligned}\] Assuming that the wave function and its first and second derivatives are finite at \(x=0\), the boundary terms vanish for Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. These are the two boundary conditions that we consider in what follows.
## Stationary states of the quantum black hole
While the classical relation between the mass parameter \(M\) and the horizon radius \(r_{\rm h}\) is given by Eq. ([\[mass-horizon\]](#mass-horizon){reference-type="ref" reference="mass-horizon"}), the mass spectrum of the quantum black hole is discrete in throat quantization. In a previous paper , we studied the mass spectrum for asymptotically flat and AdS black holes in stationary states. An intriguing result in Ref. is that the presence of a negative cosmological constant \(\Lambda\) drastically changes the spectrum: While the mass of the black hole is equally spaced in the asymptotically AdS case, entropy is equally spaced in the asymptotically flat case. In this analysis, the entropy spectrum is obtained from the classical relation between the mass \(M\) and entropy \(S\) of a black hole, which is \[\begin{aligned}
S=\frac{2\pi}{\kappa_n^2}V_{n-2}^{(1)}\biggl(\frac{2\kappa_n^2\langle M\rangle_N}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(1)}}\biggl)^{(n-2)/(n-3)} \label{entropy-k=1} \end{aligned}\] for \(k=1\) and \(\Lambda=0\), and \[\begin{aligned}
S=&\frac{2\pi}{\kappa_n^2}V_{n-2}^{(0)}\biggl(\frac{2\kappa_n^2l^2\langle M\rangle_N}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}}\biggl)^{(n-2)/(n-1)} \label{entropy-k=0} \end{aligned}\] for \(k=0\) and \(\Lambda<0\). The relation ([\[entropy-k=0\]](#entropy-k=0){reference-type="ref" reference="entropy-k=0"}) also holds for black holes with \(k=\pm 1\) and \(\Lambda<0\) in the large-mass limit. In the following subsections, we will summarize the results in Ref. .
### Asymptotically flat black hole
For asymptotically flat black holes (\(k=1\)) with \(\Lambda=0\), the WKB approximation yields a mass spectrum that is not equally spaced. Instead, it is the entropy that is equally spaced : \[\begin{aligned}
S\simeq &4\pi^{3/2}\hbar \frac{\Gamma(\frac{n-1}{2(n-3)}+\frac12)}{\Gamma(\frac{n-1}{2(n-3)})}N=:S_N,\label{spectrum-flat} \end{aligned}\] where \(N\) is a large integer. This is independent of the extension parameter \(L\) in the boundary condition ([\[eq:robin bc\]](#eq:robin bc){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:robin bc"}). Some particular cases of the above are \[\begin{aligned}
S_N= \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 4\pi^{3/2}\hbar N\frac{\Gamma(2)}{\Gamma(3/2)}=4\pi \hbar N~~(n=4)\\ 4\pi^{3/2}\hbar N\frac{\Gamma(3/2)}{\Gamma(1)} =\pi^2 \hbar N~(n=5)\\ 4\pi^{3/2}\hbar \frac{\Gamma(1)}{\Gamma(1/2)}N=2\pi\hbar N~~(n\to \infty). \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}\] The relation ([\[entropy-k=1\]](#entropy-k=1){reference-type="ref" reference="entropy-k=1"}) with the result ([\[spectrum-flat\]](#spectrum-flat){reference-type="ref" reference="spectrum-flat"}) means that for large \(N\) the mass spectrum behaves as \[\begin{aligned}
\langle M\rangle_N\propto N^{(n-3)/(n-2)}. \label{spectrum-mass-flat} \end{aligned}\]
### Asymptotically AdS black hole
In the presence of negative \(\Lambda\), the mass spectrum for toroidal black holes (\(k=0\)) under the Dirichlet or Neumann boundary condition can be obtained exactly as \[\begin{aligned}
\langle M\rangle_N=\frac{(n-1)\hbar}{2l}\biggl(N+\frac12\biggl) \quad (N=0,1,2,\cdots), \label{EN:toroidal} \end{aligned}\] where even (odd) \(N\) corresponds to the Neumann (Dirichlet) boundary condition [^2]. On the other hand, the spectrum for black holes with \(k=\pm 1\) has only been obtained in the WKB approximation: \[\begin{aligned}
\langle M\rangle_N \simeq \frac{(n-1)\hbar}{2l}N, \label{spectrum-AdS} \end{aligned}\] where \(N\) is a large integer. The spectrum ([\[spectrum-AdS\]](#spectrum-AdS){reference-type="ref" reference="spectrum-AdS"}) for large \(N\) is independent of the extension parameter \(L\) in the boundary condition ([\[eq:robin bc\]](#eq:robin bc){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:robin bc"}). At first glance, the two results ([\[spectrum-mass-flat\]](#spectrum-mass-flat){reference-type="ref" reference="spectrum-mass-flat"}) and ([\[spectrum-AdS\]](#spectrum-AdS){reference-type="ref" reference="spectrum-AdS"}) appear to be inconsistent in the limit of vanishing cosmological constant \(\Lambda\to0\) (\(l\to\infty\)) for spherical AdS black holes (\(k= 1\)). However, this apparent discrepancy can easily be understood by noting the presence of two different length scales, namely the Planck length \(\ell_{\rm p}\) and the AdS radius \(l\). The mass-horizon relation ([\[mass-horizon\]](#mass-horizon){reference-type="ref" reference="mass-horizon"}) shows that a spherical AdS black hole is approximated by an asymptotically flat black hole if the horizon radius \(r_{\rm h}\) is much smaller than the AdS radius \(l\), while it is approximated by the toroidal AdS black hole (\(k=0\)) if \(r_{\rm h}\) is much larger than \(l\). Thus, the spectrum of the spherical AdS black hole is given by Eq. ([\[spectrum-flat\]](#spectrum-flat){reference-type="ref" reference="spectrum-flat"}) in the region of \(\ell_{\rm p}\ll r_{\rm h}\ll l\) and by Eq. ([\[spectrum-AdS\]](#spectrum-AdS){reference-type="ref" reference="spectrum-AdS"}) in the region of \(r_{\rm h}\gg l\). (See Fig. [\[fig-AdSspectrum\]](#fig-AdSspectrum){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-AdSspectrum"}.) In the limit of zero cosmological constant (\(l\to\infty\)), the black-hole spacetime becomes asymptotically flat so that the region \(r_{\rm h}\gg l\) disappears in Fig. [\[fig-AdSspectrum\]](#fig-AdSspectrum){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-AdSspectrum"} and the mass spectrum ([\[spectrum-flat\]](#spectrum-flat){reference-type="ref" reference="spectrum-flat"}) is valid in the region of \(r_{\rm h}\gg \ell_{\rm p}\)[^3].
## Horizons of the quantum toroidal black hole
Now let us focus on the toroidal black hole (\(k=0\)). Classically, the horizon radius \(r=r_{\rm h}\) with mass \(M\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
r_{\rm h}=&\biggl(\frac{2\kappa_n^2l^2M}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}}\biggl)^{1/(n-1)} =l_{\rm p}\biggl(\frac{2l^2M}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}l_{\rm p}^2m_{\rm p}}\biggl)^{1/(n-1)}. \label{c-horizon} \end{aligned}\] How, then, does one define the location of the "horizon" for a quantum black hole?
### "Classical\" horizon
One option is simply to use Eq. ([\[c-horizon\]](#c-horizon){reference-type="ref" reference="c-horizon"}) with \(M\) replaced by the mass expectation value, namely \[\begin{aligned}
r_{\rm C}:=l_{\rm p}\biggl(\frac{2l^2\langle M\rangle_N}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}l_{\rm p}^2m_{\rm p}}\biggl)^{1/(n-1)}. \label{q-horizon1} \end{aligned}\] In the stationary state, there is no mass fluctuation, so that \(r_{\rm C}\) is fixed without ambiguity. For this reason, we call \(r_{\rm C}\) the areal radius of the "classical" horizon. The surface area of the classical horizon is then defined by \[\begin{aligned}
A_{\rm C}:=V_{n-2}^{(0)}r_{\rm C}^{n-2}=A_{\rm p}\biggl(\frac{2l^2\langle M\rangle_N}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}l_{\rm p}^2m_{\rm p}}\biggl)^{(n-2)/(n-1)}.\label{def-Ac} \end{aligned}\] However, in non-stationary states, mass fluctuations \(\delta \langle M\rangle_N\) cause the fluctuations of the radius \(\delta r_{\rm C}\) and the surface area \(\delta A_{\rm C}\) of the classical horizon.
### Quantum horizon
Another option to define the location of the horizon for a dynamical quantum black hole comes from the throat dynamics. As explained in Sec. [3.2](#sec:ClassicalThroatDynamics){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ClassicalThroatDynamics"}, the classical throat radius \(a(t)\) starts to grow from zero corresponding to the white-hole singularity, turns to decrease after reaching the maximum value at the bifurcation \((n-2)\)-surface, and finally becomes zero again at the black-hole singularity. (See Fig. [\[SingleBH\]](#SingleBH){reference-type="ref" reference="SingleBH"}(b).) Because the maximum value of \(a(t)\) at the bifurcation \((n-2)\)-surface corresponds to the horizon radius classically, one may identify the location of the horizon of a quantum black hole by the maximum value of \(\langle a\rangle_N(t)\), namely \[\begin{aligned}
r_{\rm Q}:=\max_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\langle a\rangle_N(t). \end{aligned}\] We call \(r_{\rm Q}\) the areal radius of the "quantum" horizon. Note that such an option is not available for stationary states, since of course the expectation values do not change with time. One can instead identify the quantum turning point in the semi-classical limit with the value of \(a\) (far from the origin in the case of the half line) where the probability density is greatest, since for the classical system the probability of finding the particle is greatest near the point where the velocity vanishes. However, using the above arguments, one may also choose to define the size of the black hole by the maximum value, not of the areal radius \(a(t)\), but instead of the surface area \(A(t):=V_{n-2}^{(0)}a^{n-2}\). Then, the surface area of the quantum black hole is defined by \[\begin{aligned}
A_{\rm Q}:=\max_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\langle A\rangle_N(t), \end{aligned}\] where \(A_{\rm Q}\ne V_{n-2}^{(0)}r_{\rm Q}^{n-2}\) holds in general. The fluctuations of \(r_{\rm Q}\) and \(A_{\rm Q}\) are, respectively, given by \[\begin{aligned}
\delta r_{\rm Q}:=&\sqrt{|\langle a^2\rangle_N-\langle a\rangle_N^2|}\biggl|_{\langle a\rangle_N=r_{\rm Q}}, \\ \delta A_{\rm Q}:=&\sqrt{|\langle A^2\rangle_N-\langle A\rangle_N^2|}\biggl|_{\langle A\rangle_N=A_{\rm Q}}. \end{aligned}\] In terms of \(x(:=a^{(n-1)/2})\), \(\langle a\rangle_N\) and \(\langle A\rangle_N\) are written as \[\begin{aligned}
\langle a\rangle_N=&\langle x^{2/(n-1)}\rangle_N, \label{<a>0} \\ \langle A\rangle_N=&V_{n-2}^{(0)}\langle x^{2(n-2)/(n-1)}\rangle_N. \label{<A>0} \end{aligned}\] In fact, the "quantum\" horizon can in principle be defined using the maximum value of any power of \(x\). They should all agree in the semi-classical limit, if it exists.
### Euclidean volume of the horizon
The surface area is proportional to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, and hence is a natural geometrical quantity characterizing a black hole. However, because of the rational powers in the expressions ([\[\<a\>0\]](#<a>0){reference-type="ref" reference="<a>0"}) and ([\[\<A\>0\]](#<A>0){reference-type="ref" reference="<A>0"}), it is difficult to obtain \(\langle a\rangle_N\) or \(\langle A\rangle_N\) in a closed form. In contrast, the Euclidean volume (or special relativistic volume), which we define as \(V_{\rm E}:= V_{n-2}^{(0)} a^{n-1}/(n-1)\), has a computable form in terms of \(x\): \[\begin{aligned}
\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N=\frac{V_{n-2}^{(0)}}{n-1}\langle x^{2}\rangle_N(t). \end{aligned}\] In the black-hole spacetime, \(V_{\rm E}\) does not represent the volume inside a spacelike hypersurface with constant \(r\) because \(r\) becomes a timelike coordinate inside the horizon[^4]. In order to obtain clear, analytic versions of the main results, we will use the Euclidean volume \(V_{\rm E}\) to measure the size of a quantum black hole instead of the surface area \(A\) in the present paper. The Euclidean volume of the classical horizon and its fluctuation are given, respectively, by \[\begin{aligned}
V_{\rm C}:=&\frac{V_{n-2}^{(0)}r_{\rm C}^{n-1}}{n-1}=\frac{2V_{\rm p}l^2\langle M\rangle_N}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}l_{\rm p}^2m_{\rm p}},\label{VC-def} \\ \delta V_{\rm C}:=&\frac{2V_{\rm p}l^2\delta \langle M\rangle_N}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}l_{\rm p}^2m_{\rm p}}=V_{\rm C}\frac{\delta \langle M\rangle_N}{\langle M\rangle_N},\label{deltaVC-def} \end{aligned}\] while the Euclidean volume of the quantum horizon and its fluctuation are \[\begin{aligned}
V_{\rm Q}:=&\max_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t)=\frac{V_{n-2}^{(0)}}{n-1}\max_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\langle x^{2}\rangle_N(t),\\ \delta V_{\rm Q}:=&\sqrt{|\langle V_{\rm E}^2\rangle_N-\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N^2|}\biggl|_{\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N=V_{\rm Q}}. \end{aligned}\]
### Semi-classical limit
For a standard quantum harmonic oscillator in the stationary state on the whole line \(x\in(-\infty,\infty)\), the energy expectation value \(\langle E\rangle_N\) and the uncertainty relation between \(x\) and its momentum conjugate \(p\) are given by \[\begin{aligned}
\langle E\rangle_N=&\hbar\omega\biggl(N+\frac12\biggl),\\ \delta\langle x\rangle_N \delta\langle p\rangle_N=&\hbar\biggl(N+\frac12\biggl), \end{aligned}\] where \(\omega\) is the angular frequency and \(N=0,1,2,\cdots\). The classical limit is formally defined by \(\hbar\to 0\) in which canonical pairs of physical quantities become commutable and the spectrum becomes continuous as the energy spacing \(\Delta\langle E\rangle_N:=\langle E\rangle_{N+1}-\langle E\rangle_N=\hbar\omega\) converges to zero. Independently, and somewhat more practically, the limit of large \(N\) is also often called the semi-classical limit since the relative energy spacing reduces to zero, namely \[\begin{aligned}
\lim_{N\to\infty}\frac{\Delta\langle E\rangle_N}{\langle E\rangle_N}\to 0. \end{aligned}\] However, this limit does not reproduce a purely classical behaviour, since the uncertainty relation still remains valid. In fact, the uncertainty in the unit of the Planck constant \(\delta\langle x\rangle_N\delta\langle p\rangle_N/\hbar\) is diverging for \(N\to \infty\). We illustrate this point using the quantity \(\langle x^2\rangle_N\) because \(\delta \langle E\rangle_N=0\) and \(\langle x\rangle_N=\langle p\rangle_N=0\) are satisfied in the stationary state. \(\langle x^2\rangle_N\) and its fluctuation are given by \[\begin{aligned}
\langle x^2\rangle_N=&\biggl(N+\frac12\biggl)\ell_0^2,\\ \delta \langle x^2\rangle_N:=&\sqrt{\langle x^4\rangle_N-\langle x^2\rangle_N^2}=\sqrt{\frac{2(N^2+N+1)}{(2N+1)^2}}\langle x^2\rangle_N. \end{aligned}\] Note that \(\ell_0:=\sqrt{\hbar/m\omega}\) is the only length scale in the system, where \(m\) is the mass of the oscillator. These expressions show \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\Delta\langle x^2\rangle_N}{\ell_0^2}=1,\qquad \frac{\delta \langle x^2\rangle_N}{\ell_0^2}=\sqrt{\frac{N^2+N+1}{2}}, \end{aligned}\] where as before \(\Delta\langle x^2\rangle_N:= \langle x^2\rangle_{N-1}-\langle x^2\rangle_N\) denotes the spacing between levels. Hence, the quantum fluctuation \(\delta \langle x^2\rangle_N\) increases as \(N\) increases and cannot be negligible in comparison with the scale \(\ell_0^2\) even for \(N=0\). Alternatively, one may use the following ratios to evaluate the fluctuations: \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\Delta\langle x^2\rangle_N}{\langle x^2\rangle_N}=&\frac{2}{2N+1},\\ \frac{\delta \langle x^2\rangle_N}{\langle x^2\rangle_N}=&\sqrt{\frac{2(N^2+N+1)}{(2N+1)^2}}. \end{aligned}\] While the relative spacing \(\Delta\langle x^2\rangle_N/\langle x^2\rangle_N\) converges to zero for large \(N\), the relative fluctuation \(\delta\langle x^2\rangle_N/\langle x^2\rangle_N\) reduces to \(1/\sqrt{2}\simeq 0.7071\) for \(N\to\infty\). Of course, for the simple harmonic oscillator on the whole line, the semi-classical behaviour is verified by observing, for example, the shape of the probability amplitude for the position operator \(x\). In the large-\(N\) limit the quantum probability of finding the particle in an finite segment of the \(x\)-axis coincides with the corresponding classical property obtained by calculating how much time the oscillating particle spends in that region. In both cases, the probability of finding the particle at the turning points, for example, is greatest, whereas the probability of finding it near the equilibrium point is small. In the context of quantum gravity, one expects classical behaviour for black holes that are sufficiently large. For dynamical quantum black holes, one may therefore define the "semi-classical limit\" by requiring that the quantum fluctuations to be negligible--namely that \(\delta \langle X\rangle/\langle X\rangle\ll 1\) for any physical quantity \(X\) associated with the black hole. In such a limit, both \(A_{\rm Q}/A_{\rm C}\to 1\) and \(V_{\rm Q}/V_{\rm C}\to 1\) are also expected to hold, so that the classical and quantum horizons coincide. One of the main purposes of the present paper is to identify such a limit for the dynamical quantum black holes described by exact wave functions.\
# Exact time-dependent wave functions for toroidal black holes {#sec:wave}
In the previous section, we summarized our main results for stationary quantum black holes. In this section, we will present exact time-dependent wave functions describing quantum black holes in non-stationary states. We focus on the case of toroidal black holes (\(k=0\)) whose Schrödinger equation ([\[Schro-eq\]](#Schro-eq){reference-type="ref" reference="Schro-eq"}) reduces to that of the simple harmonic oscillator. By the coordinate transformations \(x=\sqrt{(n-1)^2\hbar \kappa_n^2/4(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}}{\bar x}\), the Schrödinger equation ([\[Schro-eq\]](#Schro-eq){reference-type="ref" reference="Schro-eq"}) with \(k=0\) is cast into the following standard form: \[\begin{aligned}
\biggl(-\frac12\frac{\partial^2}{\partial{\bar x}^2}+\frac12\omega^2{\bar x}^2\biggl)\Psi=&i\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t},\label{tosolve} \end{aligned}\] where \[\begin{aligned}
\omega:=\frac{n-1}{2l}.\label{def-omega} \end{aligned}\] As anticipated, this equation is precisely that of a quantum harmonic oscillator on the half line \({\bar x}\in [0,\infty)\). In a previous paper , we obtained the exact stationary-state mass spectrum ([\[EN:toroidal\]](#EN:toroidal){reference-type="ref" reference="EN:toroidal"}) for the Dirichlet or Neumann boundary condition at \({\bar x}=0\). We now take advantage of the fact that for this system exact time-dependent solutions of the Schrödinger equation are also available.
## Time-dependent wave function on the whole line: A review {#sec:harmonic-review}
There is a six-parameter family of exact solutions to the Schrödinger equation ([\[tosolve\]](#tosolve){reference-type="ref" reference="tosolve"}) [^5]: \[\begin{aligned}
\Psi({\bar x},t)=&\Psi_N({\bar x},t) \nonumber \\ :=&\frac{e^{i\left(\alpha(t){\bar x}^2+\delta(t){\bar x}+\kappa(t)\right)+i(2N+1)\gamma(t)}}{\sqrt{2^NN!\mu(t)\sqrt{\pi}}} e^{-(\beta(t){\bar x}+\varepsilon(t))^2/2}H_N(\beta(t){\bar x}+\varepsilon(t)). \label{six-solution} \end{aligned}\] In the above, \(H_N\) are the Hermite polynomials with integer \(N(=0,1,2,\cdots)\) and \[\begin{aligned}
\mu(t)=&\mu_0\sqrt{{\bar\beta}_0^4\sin^2\omega t/\omega ^2+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2}, \label{six-sol1}\\ \alpha(t)=&\frac{\omega \alpha_0\cos 2\omega t+(\sin 2\omega t/\omega )({\bar\beta}_0^4+4\omega ^2\alpha_0^2-\omega ^2)/4}{{\bar\beta}_0^4\sin^2\omega t/\omega ^2+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2},\\ \beta(t)=&\frac{{\bar\beta}_0}{\sqrt{{\bar\beta}_0^4\sin^2\omega t/\omega ^2+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2}},\\ \gamma(t)=&\gamma_0-\frac12\arctan\biggl(\frac{{\bar\beta}_0^2\sin \omega t/\omega }{2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t}\biggl),\\ \delta(t)=&\frac{{\bar\delta}_0(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)+\varepsilon_0{\bar\beta}_0^3\sin \omega t/\omega }{{\bar\beta}_0^4\sin^2\omega t/\omega ^2+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2},\\ \varepsilon(t)=&\frac{\varepsilon_0(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)-{\bar\beta}_0{\bar\delta}_0\sin \omega t/\omega }{\sqrt{{\bar\beta}_0^4\sin^2\omega t/\omega ^2+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2}},\\ \kappa(t)=&\kappa_0+\frac{\sin^2 \omega t}{\omega ^2}\frac{\varepsilon_0{\bar\beta}_0^2(\omega \alpha_0\varepsilon_0-{\bar\beta}_0{\bar\delta}_0)-\omega \alpha_0{\bar\delta}_0^2}{{\bar\beta}_0^4\sin^2\omega t/\omega ^2+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2} \nonumber \\ &+\frac14\frac{\sin 2\omega t}{\omega }\frac{\varepsilon_0^2{\bar\beta}_0^2-{\bar\delta}_0^2}{{\bar\beta}_0^4\sin^2\omega t/\omega ^2+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2},\label{six-sol2} \end{aligned}\] where \(\mu_0,{\alpha}_0,{\bar \beta}_0,\gamma_0,{\bar\delta}_0,\kappa_0,\varepsilon_0\) are constants. Among them, \(\gamma_0\) and \(\kappa_0\) are phase constants. In order to verify that the solution ([\[six-solution\]](#six-solution){reference-type="ref" reference="six-solution"}) solves the Schrödinger equation ([\[tosolve\]](#tosolve){reference-type="ref" reference="tosolve"}), the following relations are useful: \[\begin{aligned}
& {\dot \mu}=2\mu \alpha,\quad {\dot \alpha}=\frac12(\beta^4-4\alpha^2-\omega^2),\label{t-derivative1} \\ & {\dot \beta}=-2\beta\alpha,\quad {\dot \gamma}=-\frac12\beta^2,\quad {\dot \delta}=\beta^3\varepsilon-2\alpha\delta, \label{t-derivative4}\\ & {\dot \varepsilon}=-\beta \delta,\quad {\dot \kappa}=\frac12(\beta^2\varepsilon^2-\delta^2),\label{t-derivative7} \end{aligned}\] where a dot denotes differentiation with respect to \(t\). Using the orthogonality condition ([\[Hermite-orthogonal\]](#Hermite-orthogonal){reference-type="ref" reference="Hermite-orthogonal"}) of the Hermite polynomials, we compute the squared norm of \(\Psi_N\) on the whole line: \[\begin{aligned}
\langle \Psi_N|\Psi_N \rangle=\int_{-\infty}^\infty|\Psi_N({\bar x},t)|^2{\rm d} {\bar x}=\frac{1}{\mu(t) \beta(t)}=\frac{1}{\mu_0{\bar \beta}_0}. \end{aligned}\] Since normalization requires \(\mu_0{\bar\beta}_0=1\), the number of independent parameters is six, of which two (\(\kappa_0\) and \(\gamma_0\)) are pure phase. The physical properties of the solution are therefore characterized by four continuous parameters \({\alpha}_0\), \({\bar \beta}_0\), \({\bar\delta}_0\), and \(\varepsilon_0\) in addition to the quantum number \(N\). Within this class of solutions, stationary states are realized as special cases for which \({\alpha}_0={\bar\delta}_0=\varepsilon_0=0\) and \({\bar \beta}_0=\sqrt{\omega}\). In this case we have \[\begin{aligned}
\mu(t)=&\mu_0,\quad \alpha(t)=0,\quad \beta(t)=\sqrt{\omega},\\ \gamma(t)=&\gamma_0-\frac12\omega t, \quad \delta(t)=\varepsilon(t)=0,\quad \kappa(t)=\kappa_0. \end{aligned}\] We will use this time-dependent solution ([\[six-solution\]](#six-solution){reference-type="ref" reference="six-solution"}) to construct exact wave functions on the half line, but first we will review some properties of the solution on the whole line. The details of computations are presented in Appendix [\[app:wholeline\]](#app:wholeline){reference-type="ref" reference="app:wholeline"}.
### Energy expectation value and uncertainty relation
The energy expectation value is given by \[\begin{aligned}
\langle E \rangle_N=&\frac{\langle \Psi_N|{\hat H}\Psi_N \rangle}{\langle \Psi_N|\Psi_N \rangle}=\biggl(N+\frac12\biggl)\hbar\Omega+\frac12\hbar\eta, \label{Energy-wholeline} \end{aligned}\] where \({\hat H}=i\hbar\partial/\partial t\) is the Hamiltonian operator and \[\begin{aligned}
\Omega:=&\frac{{\bar\beta}_0^4+4\alpha_0^2\omega^2+\omega^2}{2{\bar\beta}_0^2}, \label{Omega-def}\\ \eta:=&\frac{(2\alpha_0\varepsilon_0\omega-{\bar\beta}_0{\bar \delta}_0)^2+\varepsilon_0^2\omega^2}{{\bar\beta}_0^{2}}.\label{eta-def} \end{aligned}\] Hence, the expectation value of the energy is time independent and equally spaced, with \(\Delta \langle E\rangle_N:=\langle E\rangle_{N-1}-\langle E\rangle_N=\hbar\Omega\). On the other hand, the fluctuation of the energy \(\delta \langle E\rangle_N:=\sqrt{\langle E^2\rangle_N-\langle E\rangle_N^2}\) is in general given by a complicated expression that is time dependent. However, there is a subclass of states for which both the energy expectation value and the energy fluctuation are constant. These are the so-called "shape-preserving states", which as the name suggests are time-dependent states whose probability amplitudes move without deformation. They include as a special case the usual coherent state of the simple harmonic oscillator and will be discussed in full in Sec. [6](#sec:exact2){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:exact2"}. It turns out that the energy expectation value ([\[Energy-wholeline\]](#Energy-wholeline){reference-type="ref" reference="Energy-wholeline"}) can in general be written as \[\begin{aligned}
\langle E \rangle_N=&\biggl(N+\frac12\biggl)\hbar\Omega+\frac{\hbar}{2}\biggl(\omega^2\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N^2+\hbar^{-2}\langle p\rangle_N^2\biggl), \end{aligned}\] where \(\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N\) and \(\langle p\rangle_N\) are expectation values of the position \({\bar x}\) and the momentum \({\hat p}=-i\hbar\partial/\partial{\bar x}\), respectively, given by \[\begin{aligned}
\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N=&-\frac{\varepsilon}{\beta} \nonumber \\ =&\frac{1}{\omega}\biggl\{\biggl({\bar \delta}_0-\frac{2\alpha_0\varepsilon_0\omega}{{\bar \beta}_0}\biggl)\sin\omega t-\frac{\varepsilon_0\omega}{{\bar \beta}_0}\cos\omega t\biggl\},\label{exp-x-full}\\ \langle p\rangle_N=&\hbar\biggl(\delta-\frac{2\alpha\varepsilon}{\beta}\biggl) \nonumber \\ =&\hbar\biggl\{\biggl({\bar \delta}_0-\frac{2\alpha_0\varepsilon_0\omega}{{\bar \beta}_0}\biggl)\cos\omega t+\frac{\varepsilon_0\omega}{{\bar \beta}_0}\sin\omega t\biggl\}.\label{exp-p-full} \end{aligned}\] Thus, the constant \(\eta\) represents the sum of the kinetic and potential energies. The fluctuations of the position and momentum are given by \[\begin{aligned}
\delta \langle {\bar x}\rangle_N:=&\sqrt{\langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N-\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N^2}=\sqrt{\frac{2N+1}{2\beta^2}} \nonumber \\ =&\sqrt{\frac{(2N+1)}{2{\bar\beta}_0^2}\biggl\{\frac{{\bar\beta}_0^4}{\omega^2}\sin^2\omega t+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2\biggl\}},\\ \delta \langle p\rangle_N:=&\sqrt{\langle p^2\rangle_N-\langle p\rangle_N^2}=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar^2(2N+1)}{2\beta^2}(4\alpha^2+\beta^{4})} \nonumber \\ =&\sqrt{\frac{\hbar^2(2N+1)}{2{\bar\beta}_0^2}\biggl\{{\bar\beta}_0^4\cos^2\omega t+\omega^2(\sin\omega t-2\alpha_0\cos\omega t)^2\biggl\}}. \end{aligned}\] Hence, the uncertainty relation is given by \[\begin{aligned}
&\delta \langle {\bar x}\rangle_N\delta \langle p\rangle_N \nonumber \\ &~~=\frac{\hbar(2N+1)}{4{\bar\beta}_0^2\omega}\biggl\{(4\alpha_0^2\omega^2+{\bar\beta}_0^4+\omega^2)^2-\biggl((4\alpha_0^2\omega^2+{\bar\beta}_0^4-\omega^2)\cos2\omega t-4\alpha_0\omega^2\sin2\omega t\biggl)^2\biggl\}^{1/2}, \label{uncertainty-full} \end{aligned}\] where the expression inside the square root is positive definite.
### Shape-preserving state {#sec:ShapePreserving}
The shape-preserving states are realized for \(\alpha_0=0\) and \({\bar\beta}_0=\sqrt{\omega}\), in which case one has: \[\begin{aligned}
\mu(t)=&\mu_0,\quad \alpha(t)=0,\quad \beta(t)=\sqrt{\omega},\quad \gamma(t)=\gamma_0-\frac12\omega t, \label{eq:SPmu}\\ \delta(t)=&{\bar\delta}_0\cos \omega t+\varepsilon_0\sqrt{\omega}\sin \omega t=\sqrt{\omega\zeta}\sin (\omega t+\theta_1),\label{eq:SPdelta}\\ \varepsilon(t)=&\varepsilon_0\cos \omega t-{\bar\delta}_0\sin \omega t/\sqrt{\omega}=\sqrt{\zeta}\sin (\omega t+\theta_2),\label{eq:SPepsilon}\\ \kappa(t)=&\kappa_0-\frac{\varepsilon_0{\bar\delta}_0\sin^2 \omega t}{\sqrt{\omega}} +\frac{(\varepsilon_0^2\omega-{\bar\delta}_0^2)\sin 2\omega t}{4\omega }, \label{eq:SPkappa} \end{aligned}\] where \(\theta_1:=\arctan({\bar\delta}_0/\varepsilon_0\sqrt{\omega})\), \(\theta_2:=\arctan(-\varepsilon_0\sqrt{\omega}/{\bar\delta}_0)\), and \[\begin{aligned}
\zeta:=\varepsilon^2+\frac{\delta^2}{\beta^2}=\varepsilon_0^2+\frac{{\bar\delta}_0^2}{\omega}. \label{zeta-def} \end{aligned}\] \(\Omega=\omega\) and \(\eta=\omega\zeta\) hold in this shape-preserving state and \(\langle E\rangle_N\), \(\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N\), and \(\langle p\rangle_N\) reduce to \[\begin{aligned}
\langle E\rangle_N=&\biggl(N+\frac12\biggl)\hbar\omega+\frac12\hbar\omega\zeta,\label{energy-shapepreserving}\\ \langle {\bar x}\rangle_N=&-\frac{\varepsilon}{\sqrt{\omega}},\quad \langle p\rangle_N=\hbar\delta. \end{aligned}\] A characteristic property of the shape-preserving states is that the uncertainty relation ([\[uncertainty-full\]](#uncertainty-full){reference-type="ref" reference="uncertainty-full"}) becomes constant: \[\begin{aligned}
\delta \langle {\bar x}\rangle_N\delta \langle p\rangle_N=\hbar\biggl(N+\frac12\biggl). \end{aligned}\] For shape-preserving states, the relative fluctuation of \(\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\delta \langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}{\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}=&\frac{\sqrt{\langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N-\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N^2}}{\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}=-\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\sqrt{\frac{2N+1}{2}}. \end{aligned}\] The absolute value of this quantity diverges for large \(N\) as \[\begin{aligned}
\lim_{N\to \infty}\biggl|\frac{\delta \langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}{\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}\biggl|\simeq |\varepsilon|^{-1}N^{1/2}\to \infty. \end{aligned}\] Because the range of \(\varepsilon(t)\) is \(-\sqrt{\zeta}\le \varepsilon\le \sqrt{\zeta}\), we obtain \[\begin{aligned}
\min_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\biggl|\frac{\delta \langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}{\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}\biggl|=\sqrt{\frac{2N+1}{2\zeta}},\qquad \max_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\biggl|\frac{\delta \langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}{\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}\biggl|=\infty \end{aligned}\] for a given value of \(N\), where the minimum and maximum are realized when \(|\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N|=\max_{t\in\mathbb{R}}|\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N|=\sqrt{\zeta/\omega}\) and \(\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N=0\) hold, respectively. The minimum of the relative fluctuation reduces to zero for \(\zeta\to \infty\) as \[\begin{aligned}
\lim_{\zeta\to \infty}\min_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\biggl|\frac{\delta \langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}{\langle {\bar x}\rangle_N}\biggl|\simeq \sqrt{\frac{N}{\zeta}}\to 0. \end{aligned}\] Actually, the limit \(\zeta\to \infty\) is unphysical since it gives infinite energy; however, the minimum of the relative fluctuation becomes very small in the situation of \(\zeta\gg N\). Equation ([\[energy-shapepreserving\]](#energy-shapepreserving){reference-type="ref" reference="energy-shapepreserving"}) shows that, for \(\zeta\gg N\), the energy of the shape-preserving state is much larger than the energy in the stationary state. For later reference, we also present the relative fluctuation of \(\langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N\): \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\delta \langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N}{\langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N}=&\frac{\sqrt{\langle {\bar x}^4\rangle_N-\langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N^2}}{\langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N} \nonumber \\ =&\frac{\sqrt{2(N^2+N+1)+8(2N+1)\varepsilon^2}}{(2N+1)+2\varepsilon^2}.\label{deltax2-shape} \end{aligned}\] This quantity has a finite limit for \(N\to \infty\) as \[\begin{aligned}
\lim_{N\to \infty}\frac{\delta \langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N}{\langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}. \end{aligned}\] Figure [\[deltax2-coherent\]](#deltax2-coherent){reference-type="ref" reference="deltax2-coherent"} shows the shape of \(\delta \langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N/\langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N\) as a function of \(\varepsilon^2\) for \(N=0,1,\cdots,5\). It has a maximum at \(\varepsilon^2=3N(N+1)/2(2N+1)\). The relative fluctuation at \(\varepsilon=\pm\sqrt{\zeta}\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\delta \langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N}{\langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N}\biggl|_{\varepsilon^2=\zeta}=&\frac{\sqrt{2(N^2+N+1)+8(2N+1)\zeta}}{(2N+1)+2\zeta}, \end{aligned}\] which reduces to zero for \(\zeta\to \infty\) as \[\begin{aligned}
\lim_{\zeta\to \infty}\frac{\delta \langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N}{\langle {\bar x}^2\rangle_N}\biggl|_{t=t_{\rm max}}\simeq &\frac{\sqrt{2(2N+1)}}{\zeta^{1/2}}\to 0. \end{aligned}\]
## Time-dependent wave function on the half line
The wave function ([\[six-solution\]](#six-solution){reference-type="ref" reference="six-solution"}) is an exact solution of the Schrödinger equation ([\[tosolve\]](#tosolve){reference-type="ref" reference="tosolve"}) on the whole line \({\bar x}\in(-\infty,\infty)\). By symmetrizing or anti-symmetrizing this solution about \({\bar x}=0\), one can construct exact wave functions on the half line \({\bar x}\in[0,\infty)\) satisfying Neumann or Dirichlet boundary conditions, respectively, at the origin. This yields \[\begin{aligned}
\Psi^{(\pm)}_{N}({\bar x},t):=&\frac12\biggl(\Psi_N({\bar x},t)\pm \Psi_N(-{\bar x},t)\biggl) \nonumber \\ =&\frac{e^{i(\alpha{\bar x}^2+\kappa)+i(2N+1)\gamma}}{2\sqrt{2^NN!\mu\sqrt{\pi}}}\biggl\{e^{i\delta{\bar x}} e^{-(\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon)^2/2}H_N(\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon)\pm e^{-i\delta{\bar x}}e^{-(\beta{\bar x}-\varepsilon)^2/2}H_N(-\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon)\biggl\}, \label{SolHalfLine} \end{aligned}\] which satisfies Neumann (Dirichlet) boundary conditions at \({\bar x}=0\) for the upper (lower) sign. The square of the wave function is an even function given by \[\begin{aligned}
|\Psi^{(\pm)}_{N}|^2=&\frac{1}{2^{N+2}N!\mu\sqrt{\pi}}\biggl\{e^{-(\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon)^2}H_N(\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon)^2 \nonumber \\ &+e^{-(\beta{\bar x}-\varepsilon)^2}H_N(-\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon)^2\pm 2\cos(2\delta{\bar x}) e^{-\beta^2{\bar x}^2-\varepsilon^2}H_N(\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon)H_N(-\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon) \biggl\}. \label{SquareNormGeneral} \end{aligned}\] While the integral of the first two terms are easily evaluated to yield \[\begin{aligned}
&\int_{0}^\infty e^{-(\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon)^2}H_N(\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon)^2 {\rm d} {\bar x} \nonumber \\ =&\int_{0}^\infty e^{-(\beta{\bar x}-\varepsilon)^2}H_N(-\beta{\bar x}+\varepsilon)^2 {\rm d} {\bar x}=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}2^{N-1}N!}{\beta}, \end{aligned}\] it is difficult to compute the last term for general \(N\). Nevertheless, using the following integral and its derivatives with respect to \(q\), \[\begin{aligned}
\int_{0}^\infty \cos (2qy) e^{-y^2}{\rm d} y=&\frac12\int_{-\infty}^\infty \cos (2qy)e^{-y^2}{\rm d} y \nonumber \\ =&\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}e^{-q^2}, \end{aligned}\] one can compute the squared norm for each value of \(N\). Equation ([\[SolHalfLine\]](#SolHalfLine){reference-type="ref" reference="SolHalfLine"}) provides two families of dynamical solutions to the harmonic oscillator Schrödinger equation on the half line, one satisfying Neumann boundary conditions at the origin, the other satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions. Each family retains all the parameters of the solutions on the whole line. For the reasons given before, the physical parameters are \(\varepsilon_0\), \({\bar \delta}_0\), \(\alpha_0\), \({\bar \beta}_0\) and the integer \(N\). We have omitted \(\mu_0\) since it is determined in terms of \(\varepsilon_0\) and \({\bar \beta}_0\) via the normalization condition (cf. Eq. ([\[SquareNormGeneral\]](#SquareNormGeneral){reference-type="ref" reference="SquareNormGeneral"})). We emphasize that the two families live in distinct Hilbert spaces in which the Hamiltonian is self-adjoint. Given that there is such a large parameter space of solutions, it is difficult to analyze the dynamical behaviour in full generality. In the following, we will therefore focus on two different subclasses of solutions of particular interest. The subclasses retain two distinct pairs of parameters and are characterized by different dynamical behaviour.
### Wave function I
The first class of wave functions on the half line is obtained from ([\[SolHalfLine\]](#SolHalfLine){reference-type="ref" reference="SolHalfLine"}) by setting \({\bar\delta}_0=\varepsilon_0=0\) (and hence \(\delta(t)=\varepsilon(t)=0\)). It is interesting to note that making this substitution directly into the wave function ([\[six-solution\]](#six-solution){reference-type="ref" reference="six-solution"}) also yields Neumann or Dirichlet boundary conditions, without the need to (anti-)symmetrize first [^6]. One obtains \[\begin{aligned}
\Psi_{{\rm I}(N)}({\bar x},t):=&\frac{e^{i(\alpha(t){\bar x}^2+\kappa(t))+i(2N+1)\gamma(t)}}{\sqrt{2^NN!\mu(t)\sqrt{\pi}}}e^{-\beta(t)^2{\bar x}^2/2}H_N(\beta(t){\bar x}), \label{sol-first} \end{aligned}\] where \[\begin{aligned}
\mu(t)=&\mu_0\sqrt{{\bar\beta}_0^4\sin^2\omega t/\omega ^2+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2}, \\ \alpha(t)=&\frac{\omega \alpha_0\cos 2\omega t+(\sin 2\omega t/\omega )({\bar\beta}_0^4+4\omega ^2\alpha_0^2-\omega ^2)/4}{{\bar\beta}_0^4\sin^2\omega t/\omega ^2+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2},\\ \beta(t)=&\frac{{\bar\beta}_0}{\sqrt{{\bar\beta}_0^4\sin^2\omega t/\omega ^2+(2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t)^2}},\\ \gamma(t)=&\gamma_0-\frac12\arctan\biggl(\frac{{\bar\beta}_0^2\sin \omega t/\omega }{2\alpha_0\sin \omega t+\cos \omega t}\biggl),\\ \kappa(t)=&\kappa_0. \end{aligned}\] Neumann (Dirichlet) boundary conditions are satisfied for even (odd) \(N\). In this case, the normalization can be carried out explicitly: \[\begin{aligned}
\langle \Psi_{{\rm I}(N)}|\Psi_{{\rm I}(N)}\rangle=&\int_{0}^\infty|\Psi_{{\rm I}(N)}({\bar x},t)|^2{\rm d} {\bar x} \nonumber \\ =&\frac{1}{2\mu(t)\beta(t)}=\frac{1}{2\mu_0{\bar \beta}_0}. \label{s-norm-half} \end{aligned}\] As claimed previously, this class of solutions has two independent continuous physical parameters \(\alpha_0\) and \({\bar \beta}_0\) in addition to the quantum number \(N\). The parameters \(\gamma_0\) and \(\kappa_0\) are, as before, pure phase, while the parameter \(\mu_0\) is determined by normalization of \(\Psi_{{\rm I}(N)}\). Stationary states on the half line are realized for all \(N\) when \(\alpha_0=0\) and \({\bar\beta}_0=\sqrt{\omega}\).
### Wave function II
The second class of exact wave functions \(\Psi=\Psi^{(\pm)}_{{\rm II}(N)}({\bar x},t)\) on the half line is given by setting \(\alpha_0=0\) and \(\beta_0=\sqrt{\omega}\) into the (anti-)symmetrized wave functions ([\[SolHalfLine\]](#SolHalfLine){reference-type="ref" reference="SolHalfLine"}). One thereby obtains subclasses of (anti-)symmetric states \(\Psi^{(\pm)}_{{\rm II}(N)}\). These are the analogues from the state on the half line of the shape-preserving solutions described in Sec. [4.1.2](#sec:ShapePreserving){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ShapePreserving"}. They can also be obtained directly by (anti-)symmetrizing the shape-preserving solutions on the whole line. The wave function \(\Psi^{(\pm)}_{{\rm II}(N)}({\bar x},t)\) is given by Eq. ([\[SolHalfLine\]](#SolHalfLine){reference-type="ref" reference="SolHalfLine"}) with the functions ([\[eq:SPmu\]](#eq:SPmu){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SPmu"})--([\[eq:SPkappa\]](#eq:SPkappa){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SPkappa"}). It is useful to exhibit the first six squared norms: \[\begin{aligned}
\int_0^\infty|\Psi^{(\pm)}_{{\rm II}(0)}|^2{\rm d} {\bar x}=&\frac{1}{4\mu\beta}\biggl\{1\pm e^{-\zeta}\biggl\},\\ \int_0^\infty|\Psi^{(\pm)}_{{\rm II}(1)}|^2{\rm d} {\bar x}=&\frac{1}{4\mu\beta}\biggl\{1\pm \biggl(2\zeta-1\biggl)e^{-\zeta}\biggl\},\\ \int_0^\infty|\Psi^{(\pm)}_{{\rm II}(2)}|^2{\rm d} {\bar x}=&\frac{1}{4\mu\beta}\biggl\{1\pm \biggl(2\zeta^2-4\zeta+1\biggl)e^{-\zeta}\biggl\},\\ \int_0^\infty|\Psi^{(\pm)}_{{\rm II}(3)}|^2{\rm d} {\bar x}=&\frac{1}{12\mu\beta}\biggl\{3\pm \biggl(4\zeta^3-18\zeta^2+18\zeta-3\biggl)e^{-\zeta}\biggl\},\\ \int_0^\infty|\Psi^{(\pm)}_{{\rm II}(4)}|^2{\rm d} {\bar x}=&\frac{1}{12\mu\beta}\biggl\{3\pm \biggl(2\zeta^4-16\zeta^3+36\zeta^2-24\zeta+3\biggl)e^{-\zeta}\biggl\},\\ \int_0^\infty|\Psi^{(\pm)}_{{\rm II}(5)}|^2{\rm d} {\bar x}=&\frac{1}{60\mu\beta}\biggl\{15\pm \biggl(4\zeta^5-50\zeta^4+200\zeta^3-300\zeta^2+150\zeta-15\biggl)e^{-\zeta}\biggl\}, \end{aligned}\] where \[\begin{aligned}
\zeta:=\varepsilon(t)^2+\frac{\delta(t)^2}{\beta(t)^2}=\varepsilon_0^2+\frac{{\bar\delta}_0^2}{{\bar\beta}_0^2}. \label{eq:zeta} \end{aligned}\] It is interesting to note that the physical properties of these solutions depend only on the time-independent combination of \(\varepsilon(t)\) and \(\delta(t)\) given by \(\zeta\), which measures the difference from the stationary state (\({\bar \delta}_0=0\) and \({\varepsilon}_0=0\)) or a vanishing wave function \(\Psi^{(\pm)}_{{\rm II}(N)}\equiv 0\). The latter is realized for \(\zeta=0\) in the case of the upper sign with odd \(N\) or the lower sign with even \(N\). The evolutions of the (unnormalized) squared norm \(|\Psi^{(+)}_{{\rm II}(N)}|^2\) and \(|\Psi^{(-)}_{{\rm II}(N)}|^2\) with \(N=0,1,2\) are drawn in Figs. [\[fig-wave2(all-)\]](#fig-wave2(all-)){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-wave2(all-)"} and [\[fig-wave2(all+)\]](#fig-wave2(all+)){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-wave2(all+)"}, respectively. They show that, while the evolution is rather chaotic for \(\zeta=1\), the wave packet is shape preserving when it is away from the origin for \(\zeta=40\).
# Quantum toroidal black hole: Wave function I {#sec:exact1}
In this section, we will study quantum toroidal black holes described by the wave function ([\[sol-first\]](#sol-first){reference-type="ref" reference="sol-first"}). Hereafter we assume \({\bar \beta}_0\ge 0\) (hence \(\beta(t)\ge 0\)) without loss of generality. The details of computations are presented in Appendix [\[app:halfline\]](#app:halfline){reference-type="ref" reference="app:halfline"}.
## Dynamical singularity resolution
The solution ([\[sol-first\]](#sol-first){reference-type="ref" reference="sol-first"}) is a function in the Hilbert space \({\cal L}^2([0,\infty))\) with the Dirichlet or Neumann boundary condition at the origin and nonsingular for \(t\in (-\infty,\infty)\). Hence the classical initial singularity at \(r=0\) (hence at \(x={\bar x}=0\)) is avoided in the quantum system. The oscillatory evolution of the normalized squared norm \(|\Psi_{{\rm I}(N)}({\bar x},t)|^2\) is exhibited in Fig. [\[fig-wave1(all)\]](#fig-wave1(all)){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-wave1(all)"} for several values of the quantum number \(N\). We now examine the time evolution of the expectation value of the Euclidean volume constructed from the areal radius \(r(=a)\), given by \(V_{\rm E}=V_{n-2}^{(0)}x^2/(n-1)\). Classically, along the orbit of the wormhole throat in the maximally extended spacetime, \(V_{\rm E}(t)\) starts from zero at the white-hole singularity at \(x=0\), reaches the maximum value at the bifurcation \((n-2)\)-surface corresponding to the event horizon, and then turns to decrease toward \(x=0\) at the black-hole singularity. The volume expectation value is given by \[\begin{aligned}
\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t)=&\frac{(2N+1)(n-1)\hbar \kappa_n^2}{8(n-2)\beta(t)^2} \nonumber \\ =&V_{\rm p}\frac{(2N+1)(n-1)l}{4(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}\ell_{\rm p}}\frac{\Omega}{\omega}\biggl(1+\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}}\sin (2\omega t+\theta_0)\biggl),\label{V_E-0} \end{aligned}\] where \(\Omega\) is defined by Eq. ([\[Omega-def\]](#Omega-def){reference-type="ref" reference="Omega-def"}) and we use the following expression: \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{\beta(t)^2}=&\frac{\Omega}{\omega^2}\biggl(1+\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}}\sin (2\omega t+\theta_0)\biggl),\label{beta-inverse} \\ \theta_0:=&\arctan\biggl\{\frac{1}{2\alpha_0}\biggl(1-\frac{{\bar\beta}_0^2\Omega}{\omega^2}\biggl)\biggl\}. \end{aligned}\] (See Appendix [\[app:area\]](#app:area){reference-type="ref" reference="app:area"} for derivation of \(\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N\).) This shows that \(\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N\) is positive definite and oscillating, and hence the classical spacelike singularity at \(r=0\) is resolved quantum mechanically and replaced by a big-bounce. The classical description of the regularized black hole is presented in Fig. [\[SingleBH-bounce\]](#SingleBH-bounce){reference-type="ref" reference="SingleBH-bounce"}. Note that the combination of the parameters \(\Omega\) defined by Eq. ([\[Omega-def\]](#Omega-def){reference-type="ref" reference="Omega-def"}) provides a measure of the difference between the above states and the corresponding stationary state with the same \(N\). The expression \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\Omega}{\omega}=\frac{{\bar \beta}_0^4+4\alpha_0^2\omega^2+\omega^2}{2{\bar \beta}_0^2\omega} \end{aligned}\] shows that \(\Omega\ge \omega\) holds, with equality holding only in the stationary case (\(\alpha_0=0\) and \({\bar\beta}_0^2=\omega\)). On the other hand, the high-amplitude limit \(\Omega/\omega\to \infty\) is realized in two independent limits: \({\bar\beta}_0^2/\omega\to\infty\) or \(\alpha_0^2\omega/{\bar \beta}_0^2\to \infty\). In the next subsection, we will see that this high-amplitude limit \(\Omega/\omega\to \infty\) corresponds to infinite mass spacing, and therefore the limit is unphysical. The limit \(\Omega/\omega\to \infty\) should therefore be interpreted as \(\Omega\gg \omega\), as done in the following. In terms of the Planck length \(\ell_{\rm p}\) and the Planck volume \(V_{\rm p}\), the maximum and minimum values of \(\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t)\) are given by \[\begin{aligned}
\max_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t)=&\frac{(2N+1)(n-1)l}{4(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}\ell_{\rm p}}\frac{\Omega}{\omega}\biggl(1+\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}}\biggl)V_{\rm p},\\ \min_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t)=&\frac{(2N+1)(n-1)l}{4(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}\ell_{\rm p}}\frac{\Omega}{\omega}\biggl(1-\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}}\biggl)V_{\rm p}, \end{aligned}\] where we use \(\omega:=(n-1)/2l\). In the stationary case (\(\Omega=\omega\)), \(\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N\) is constant: \[\begin{aligned}
\lim_{\Omega/\omega\to 1}\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t)=\frac{(2N+1)(n-1)l}{4(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}\ell_{\rm p}}V_{\rm p}. \end{aligned}\] In the high-amplitude limit \(\Omega/\omega\to \infty\), on the other hand, we obtain \[\begin{aligned}
\lim_{\Omega/\omega\to \infty}\max_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t)\simeq& \frac{(2N+1)(n-1)l}{2(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}\ell_{\rm p}}\frac{\Omega}{\omega}\to \infty,\\ \lim_{\Omega/\omega\to \infty}\min_{t\in\mathbb{R}}\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t)\simeq& \frac{(2N+1)(n-1)l}{8(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}\ell_{\rm p}}\frac{\omega}{\Omega}\to 0. \end{aligned}\]
## Mass of the quantum black hole
The physical meaning of the parameter \(\Omega\) is made explicit by the following expression for the expectation value of the mass of the black hole: \[\begin{aligned}
\langle M\rangle_N:=&\frac{\langle \Psi_{{\rm I}(N)}|{\hat H}\Psi_{{\rm I}(N)}\rangle}{\langle \Psi_{{\rm I}(N)}|\Psi_{{\rm I}(N)}\rangle}=\biggl(N+\frac12\biggl)\hbar \Omega. \label{mass-spectrum-dynamical} \end{aligned}\] (See Appendix. [\[app:mass\]](#app:mass){reference-type="ref" reference="app:mass"} for derivation.) Equation ([\[mass-spectrum-dynamical\]](#mass-spectrum-dynamical){reference-type="ref" reference="mass-spectrum-dynamical"}) shows that \(\Omega\), defined by Eq. ([\[Omega-def\]](#Omega-def){reference-type="ref" reference="Omega-def"}), defines the mass step (i.e. spacing) between the neighboring states. Since we have \(\Omega\ge \omega\), with equality holding only for the stationary state, the mass step in the non-stationary state is larger than in the stationary state. The expression ([\[mass-spectrum-dynamical\]](#mass-spectrum-dynamical){reference-type="ref" reference="mass-spectrum-dynamical"}) also confirms that the strict high-amplitude limit \(\Omega/\omega\to \infty\) is unphysical. However, we will still consider the situation \(\Omega\gg \omega\) corresponding to a large black hole. Although both of the limits \(\Omega/\omega\to \infty\) and \(N\to \infty\) correspond to the large-mass limit of a black hole, they are independent. The mass spacing \(\Delta\langle M\rangle_N\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
\Delta\langle M\rangle_N:=\langle M\rangle_{N+1}-\langle M\rangle_N=\hbar \Omega \end{aligned}\] and hence \(N\to\infty\) is a semi-classical limit in the sense that the relative mass spacing reduces to zero: \[\begin{aligned}
\lim_{N\to\infty}\frac{\Delta\langle M\rangle_N}{\langle M\rangle_N}=&\lim_{N\to\infty}\biggl(N+\frac12\biggl)^{-1}=0. \end{aligned}\] On the other hand, the mass fluctuation \(\delta \langle M\rangle_N:=\sqrt{\langle M^2\rangle_N-\langle M\rangle_N^2}\) satisfies \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\delta \langle M\rangle_N}{\langle M\rangle_N}=\sqrt{\frac{2(N^2+N+1)}{(2N+1)^2}\biggl(1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}\biggl)}. \label{mass-uncertainty-dynamical} \end{aligned}\] (See Appendix [\[app:mass\]](#app:mass){reference-type="ref" reference="app:mass"} for the derivation of \(\delta \langle M\rangle_N\).) Clearly, there is no mass uncertainty in the stationary case (\(\Omega=\omega\)). In the non-stationary case, by contrast, the mass uncertainty is non-zero. In the two independent large-mass limits \(\Omega/\omega\to \infty\) and \(N\to 0\), we obtain \[\begin{aligned}
\lim_{\Omega/\omega\to \infty}\frac{\delta \langle M\rangle_N}{\langle M\rangle_N}=&\sqrt{\frac{2(N^2+N+1)}{(2N+1)^2}}\biggl(>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\biggl),\\ \lim_{N\to\infty}\frac{\delta \langle M\rangle_N}{\langle M\rangle_N}=&\sqrt{\frac12\biggl(1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}\biggl)}\biggl(<\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\biggl). \end{aligned}\] The relative mass fluctuations therefore are non-negligible even for large-mass quantum black holes with \(\Omega \gg \omega\). On the other hand, for large black holes for which \(N\to \infty\), the mass fluctuations can be small if the state is very close to the stationary state. If \(\delta \langle M\rangle_N/\hbar\Omega\ge 1\), the mass fluctuation is greater than the spacing of the mass expectation value between states. Its physical implications are still not clear. From the expression \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\delta \langle M\rangle_N}{\hbar\Omega}=\sqrt{\frac{N^2+N+1}{2}\biggl(1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}\biggl)}, \end{aligned}\] we see that \(\delta \langle M\rangle_N/\hbar\Omega<1\) is satisfied for \(N=0\), independent \(\Omega\). Also, the above expression shows that the condition \(\delta \langle M\rangle_N/\hbar\Omega \ge 1\) is satisfied for \(N\ge N_{\rm c}\), where the critical value \(N_{\rm c}\) is a positive solution of the following algebraic equation: \[\begin{aligned}
N_{\rm c}^2+N_{\rm c}+1=2\biggl(1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}\biggl)^{-1}. \end{aligned}\] If \(\Omega\) is close to \(\omega\), then \(\delta \langle M\rangle_N/\hbar\Omega<1\) is satisfied even for large \(N\). However, if the state is non-stationary, then \(\delta \langle M\rangle_N/\hbar\Omega>1\) is satisfied only for sufficiently large \(N\).
## Euclidean volume of the quantum black hole {#app:volumeBH}
From Eqs. ([\[VC-def\]](#VC-def){reference-type="ref" reference="VC-def"}) and ([\[mass-spectrum-dynamical\]](#mass-spectrum-dynamical){reference-type="ref" reference="mass-spectrum-dynamical"}), the Euclidean volume of the classical horizon \(V_{\rm C}\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
V_{\rm C}=&V_{\rm p}\frac{l^2(2N+1)\hbar\Omega}{(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}l_{\rm p}^2m_{\rm p}}. \label{Vh} \end{aligned}\] By Eqs. ([\[deltaVC-def\]](#deltaVC-def){reference-type="ref" reference="deltaVC-def"}) and ([\[mass-uncertainty-dynamical\]](#mass-uncertainty-dynamical){reference-type="ref" reference="mass-uncertainty-dynamical"}), the uncertainty \(\delta V_{\rm C}\) satisfies \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\delta V_{\rm C}}{V_{\rm C}}=\sqrt{\frac{2(N^2+N+1)}{(2N+1)^2}\biggl(1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}\biggl)}. \label{deltaVh} \end{aligned}\] On the other hand, the Euclidean volume of the quantum horizon \(V_{\rm Q}\) and its uncertainty \(\delta V_{\rm Q}\) are defined by \(V_{\rm Q}:=\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t_{\rm max})\) and \(\delta V_{\rm Q}:=\delta \langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t_{\rm max})\), respectively, where \(t_{\rm max}\) is the time when \(\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N\) has the maximum value. Equation ([\[V_E-0\]](#V_E-0){reference-type="ref" reference="V_E-0"}) can be written as \[\begin{aligned}
\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t)=&V_{\rm p}\frac{l^2(2N+1)\hbar\Omega}{2(n-2)V_{n-2}^{(0)}\ell_{\rm p}^2m_{\rm p}} \biggl(1+\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}}\sin (2\omega t+\theta_0)\biggl) \end{aligned}\] and its uncertainty is given by \[\begin{aligned}
\delta \langle V_{\rm E}\rangle_N(t)=&\sqrt{\frac{2(N^2+N+1)}{(2N+1)^2}}\langle V_{\rm E}\rangle(t) \label{deltaV} \end{aligned}\] (See in Appendix [\[app:area\]](#app:area){reference-type="ref" reference="app:area"} for derivation.) These expressions show \[\begin{aligned}
V_{\rm Q}=&\frac12V_{\rm C}\biggl(1+\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}}\biggl), \label{VQ} \\ \delta V_{\rm Q}=&V_{\rm Q}\sqrt{\frac{2(N^2+N+1)}{(2N+1)^2}} \nonumber \\ =&\frac12V_{\rm C}\sqrt{\frac{2(N^2+N+1)}{(2N+1)^2}}\biggl(1+\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}}\biggl). \label{deltaVQ} \end{aligned}\] Equations ([\[deltaVh\]](#deltaVh){reference-type="ref" reference="deltaVh"}), ([\[VQ\]](#VQ){reference-type="ref" reference="VQ"}), and ([\[deltaVQ\]](#deltaVQ){reference-type="ref" reference="deltaVQ"}) imply the following relations: \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{V_{\rm Q}}{V_{\rm C}}=&\frac12\biggl(1+\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}}\biggl),\\ \frac{\delta V_{\rm C}}{V_{\rm C}}=&\frac{\delta V_{\rm Q}}{V_{\rm Q}}\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}}, \label{V-relations} \end{aligned}\] which are independent of \(N\). \(\delta V_{\rm C}/V_{\rm C}\) and \(V_{\rm Q}/V_{\rm C}\) are drawn in Fig. [\[VQVC-deltaVC\]](#VQVC-deltaVC){reference-type="ref" reference="VQVC-deltaVC"} as functions of \(\omega/\Omega\) for \(N=0,1,\cdots,5\). We have \(1/2\le V_{\rm Q}/V_{\rm C}<1\) and hence the quantum horizon is located inside the classical horizon. The Euclidean volume of the quantum black hole is half that of the classical black hole in the stationary state (\(\omega/\Omega=1\)). As \(\omega/\Omega\) decreases, the ratio \(V_{\rm Q}/V_{\rm C}\) monotonically increases and \(V_{\rm Q}/V_{\rm C}=\delta V_{\rm Q}/\delta V_{\rm C}=1\) is satisfied, namely the quantum horizon coincides with the classical horizon, in the high-amplitude limit \(\omega/\Omega\to 0\) (and hence for large black holes with \(\Omega\gg \omega\)). Equation ([\[deltaVQ\]](#deltaVQ){reference-type="ref" reference="deltaVQ"}) shows that \(\delta V_{\rm Q}/V_{\rm Q}\) is independent of \(\omega/\Omega\) and is a monotonically decreasing function of \(N\) satisfying \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<\frac{\delta V_{\rm Q}}{V_{\rm Q}} \le \sqrt{2}, \end{aligned}\] where the lower and upper bounds correspond to \(N\to\infty\) and \(N=0\), respectively. Hence the relative volume fluctuation of the quantum horizon is not negligible even for large black holes described both by \(N\to \infty\) and by \(\Omega\gg\omega\). This implies that the quantum black hole described by wave function I does not have a semi-classical limit. On the other hand, Eq. ([\[deltaVh\]](#deltaVh){reference-type="ref" reference="deltaVh"}) shows that \(\delta V_{\rm C}/V_{\rm C}\) depends on \(\omega/\Omega\) and is also a monotonically decreasing function of \(N\) satisfying \[\begin{aligned}
\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}\biggl(1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}\biggl)}<\frac{\delta V_{\rm C}}{V_{\rm C}} \le \sqrt{2\biggl(1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}\biggl)}. \end{aligned}\] As \(\omega/\Omega\) becomes smaller, the properties of the classical horizon are more similar to the quantum horizon. In contrast, the fluctuation of the classical horizon gets smaller and finally becomes zero in the stationary limit \(\omega/\Omega\to 1\). In closing this section, we present physical quantities in terms of the surface area for comparison. By Eqs. ([\[def-Ac\]](#def-Ac){reference-type="ref" reference="def-Ac"}), ([\[beta-inverse\]](#beta-inverse){reference-type="ref" reference="beta-inverse"}), and ([\[mass-spectrum-dynamical\]](#mass-spectrum-dynamical){reference-type="ref" reference="mass-spectrum-dynamical"}) and the results in Appendix [\[app:area\]](#app:area){reference-type="ref" reference="app:area"}, we obtain \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{A_{\rm Q}}{A_{\rm C}}=&\frac{\int_{0}^{\infty} y^{2(n-2)/(n-1)} e^{-y^2}H_N(y)^2 {\rm d} y}{2^{N-1}N!\sqrt{\pi}}\biggl\{\frac{1}{2N+1}\biggl(1+\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}}\biggl)\biggl\}^{(n-2)/(n-1)}, \label{A-relations1}\\ \frac{\delta A_{\rm C}}{A_{\rm C}}=&\biggl\{\frac{2(N^2+N+1)}{(2N+1)^2}\biggl(1-\frac{\omega^2}{\Omega^2}\biggl)\biggl\}^{(n-2)/2(n-1)},\label{A-relations2}\\ \frac{\delta A_{\rm Q}}{A_{\rm Q}}=&\biggl(\frac{2^{N-1}N!\sqrt{\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty} y^{4(n-2)/(n-1)} e^{-y^2}H_N(y)^2 {\rm d} y}{(\int_{0}^{\infty} y^{2(n-2)/(n-1)} e^{-y^2}H_N(y)^2 {\rm d} y)^2}-1\biggl)^{1/2}. \label{A-relations3} \end{aligned}\]
:::
# Summary and future prospects {#sec:summary}
In this paper we have studied the quantum dynamics of toroidal AdS black holes in the framework of throat quantization pioneered by Louko and Mäkelä . The resulting Schrödinger equation is equivalent to that of a quantum harmonic oscillator on the half line. While the classical dynamics represented by the Hamiltonian is equivalent to the dynamics of the wormhole throat in the maximally extended black-hole spacetime, the time \(t\) is by construction the proper time at one AdS infinity in the spacetime. Therefore, all the expectation values of physical/geometrical quantities are for an observer at rest at AdS infinity. The Hamiltonian operator in the Hilbert space \({\cal L}^2([0,\infty))\) admits a one-parameter family of boundary conditions at the location of the classical singularity \(x=0\) with extension parameter \(L\). For any value of \(L\), the evolution of the wave function is unitary, and the classical curvature singularity at the center is resolved quantum mechanically and replaced by a big bounce. We were able to construct exact time-dependent wave functions that satisfy either Dirichlet (\(L=0\)) or Neumann (\(L=\infty\)) boundary conditions. The existence of such exact time-dependent solutions for this class of black-hole spacetimes provides a useful framework for studying conceptual issues surrounding the quantum mechanics of black holes, such as mass uncertainty and the definition of the quantum horizon in the dynamical setting. We presented two distinct classes of exact time-dependent quantum states. Both cases clearly exhibit dynamical singularity resolution: The probability amplitudes, \(|\Psi|^2\), oscillate between the origin and a maximum "near\" the classical turning point. We evaluated analytically the mass fluctuations and examined the dynamics and fluctuations of two definitions for the horizon of a quantum black hole, the first obtained from the classical expression in terms of the mass, and the second in terms of a suitably defined Euclidean volume. The first class, wave function I, is fully dynamical in that the shape of the probability amplitude changes with time throughout the evolution. It is generally spread out far from the origin and becomes more focused near the origin. As a result, the quantum fluctuations are large for most parameter values, and a semi-classical limit is not realized except in the stationary limit. The second class, wave function II, provides a generalization to the half line of coherent states of the harmonic oscillator on the whole line. The probability amplitudes are shape preserving far from the origin and, under the circumstances where the kinetic term energy dominates the potential energy (i.e., \(\zeta\ll N\)), quantum fluctuations become small, and the classical and quantum horizons coincide so that they are able to represent semi-classical black-hole states. As expected the semi-classical, shape-preserving nature of the solutions breaks down near the origin due to the boundary conditions that provide the mechanism for singularity resolution. We have shown that the stationary states are fully quantum even in the large-mass limit \(N\to\infty\), in the sense that the classical and quantum horizons do not coincide and quantum fluctuations do not become small. On the other hand, quantum effects are very much suppressed when the states are highly dynamical, i.e., far from the stationary states. This suggests that semi-classical configurations are realized in this limit. Since our results were obtained only within two subspaces of the full parameter space of the exact time-dependent wave functions, it is still an open question as to which of the properties we observed are generic. In addition, it would be interesting to study time-dependent states for asymptotically flat black holes. We will address these problems elsewhere. | {'timestamp': '2017-11-17T02:04:41', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01906', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01906'} |
# Introduction
The theoretical understanding of quantum critical phenomena is one of the cornerstones of modern theoretical physics. It has been known for some time that such phenomena, both classical and quantum, are characterized by universal laws described by conformal field theory (CFT). Conformal invariance is constraining enough as to fully determine the space-time dependence of two-and three-point functions of local fields, demonstrating that they must exhibit power-law decay, a defining feature of criticality. Conformal field theory is particularly powerful in two dimensions, where it is associated with the presence of infinite-dimensional symmetry algebras. Beyond criticality, universal behaviours subsist at large observation scales when correlation lengths are much larger than microscopic distances. These are described by non-conformal quantum field theory (QFT). One of the deepest ideas in this context is that of the renormalization group (RG). RG flows describe how, in parameter space, a QFT model varies with the scale, connecting an ultraviolet (small length scale) to an infrared (large length large scale) fixed-point CFT. These give rise to flows between CFT models, and one might wonder what structure such RG flows may take. In the eighties Alexander B. Zamolodchikov showed that the space of *unitary* CFT is partially ordered by unitary RG flows: an RG flow associated to a non-conformal unitary QFT may exist from an ultraviolet (UV) to an infrared (IR) fixed point only if the central charges of the corresponding CFTs are ordered, \[\label{ineq} c_{\rm UV} > c_{\rm IR}.\] This implies irreversibility of (nontrivial) RG flows. Specifically, he constructed for any 1+1 dimensional unitary QFT, a function \(c(s)\) (called \(c\)-function, or scaling function) of the renormalization group parameter \(s=2\log(mr)\), where \(m\) is a characteristic mass scale and \(r\) is the observation length scale, with the following properties: it is non-negative for all \(s\), it is monotonically strictly decreasing along the RG flow (from the UV to the IR) and it takes constant values at critical points, given by the central charges of the corresponding CFTs. Therefore, the function "flows\" between its ultraviolet (or high-energy) \(c_{\rm UV}=\lim_{s\rightarrow-\infty}c(s)\) and its infrared (or low-energy) \(c_{\rm IR}=\lim_{s\rightarrow \infty}c(s)\) values, which are the central charges of the two CFTs that are found at high and low energies. This implies the strict inequality [\[ineq\]](#ineq){reference-type="eqref" reference="ineq"}. This statement is known as the \(c\)-theorem and it constitutes one of the most fundamental results for 1+1 dimensional QFT. Several alternative proofs of the \(c\)-theorem exist which, for instance, employ finite-size field-theory methods and holographic arguments for the entanglement entropy. The function \(c(s)\) may be interpreted as counting degrees of freedom at a given energy scale[^1]. It also has the interpretation as an off-critical Casimir energy, since the Casimir energy of CFT on a cylinder is proportional to the central charge \(c\), and it characterizes the logarithmic growth of entanglement in one-dimensional quantum critical systems . The key role played by the central charge \(c\) in the description of critical phenomena has been nicely reviewed in John Cardy's Boltzmann Medal lecture. In higher dimensions, similar concepts arise. Starting with John Cardy's work, the existence in four dimensional theories of an \(a\)-function with similar properties to Zamolodchikov's \(c\)-function has been recently proven . The existence of a similar monotonic function of the RG flow in three dimensions, known as an \(F\)-function, was conjectured in and later proven by using concepts of holography. Similar holographic arguments were also employed in to provide an alternative proof of the \(a\)-theorem. Entropic proofs exploit the properties of the bi-partite entanglement entropy in unitary QFT (e.g. subadditivity), emphasizing its interpretation as counting the number of degrees of freedom. In Zamolodchikov also provided a precise construction procedure for the function \(c(s)\) which employs the following correlators: \[\begin{aligned}
&&F(z\bar{z}):= z^4 \langle T(z, \bar{z}) T(0,0) \rangle=\bar{z}^4 \langle \bar{T}(z, \bar{z}) \bar{T}(0,0) \rangle, \label{f}\\ &&G(z\bar{z}):=z^3 \bar{z}\langle T(z, \bar{z})\Theta(0,0) \rangle=\bar{z}^3 {z}\langle \bar{T}(z, \bar{z})\Theta(0,0) \rangle, \label{gg}\\ && H(z\bar{z}):= z^2 \bar{z}^2 \langle \Theta (z, \bar{z})\Theta(0,0) \rangle,\label{hhh} \label{fgh} \end{aligned}\] in terms of the usual complex coordinates \(z=x+iy, \bar{z}=x-iy\) (where \(y\) is imaginary time). The operators above are nothing but the various components of the energy-momentum tensor \(T_\mu^\nu\) in these variables, namely: \(T(z,\bar{z}):= T_{zz}(z,\bar{z})\), \(\bar{T}(z,\bar{z}):=T_{\bar{z}\bar{z}}(z,\bar{z})\) and the trace \(T^\mu_\mu(z,\b z) = \Theta(z,\bar{z})=4 T_{z\bar{z}}(z,\bar{z}) = 4T_{\bar{z}z}(z,\bar{z})\). Employing conservation of the energy-momentum tensor \(\bar{\partial}T(z,\bar{z})+\frac{1}{4}\partial \Theta(z,\bar{z})=0\) and \(\partial\bar{T}(z,\bar{z})+\frac{1}{4}\bar\partial\Theta(z,\bar{z})=0\), where \(\partial:=\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\) and \(\bar{\partial}:=\frac{\partial}{\partial \bar{z}}\) it then follows that the function \[c(s)=4\pi^2\left(2 F(r)-G(r)-\frac{3}{8}H(r)\right), \label{tada}\] with \(r=z\bar{z}\) and \(s=2\log(mr)\), satisfies the equation: \[\frac{dc}{ds}=-3\pi^2H(r).\] Since \(\Theta\) is a hermitian operator, the right-hand side is non-negative by reflection positivity of unitary theories. Thus \(c(s)\) is monotonically decreasing. It is well known that \(H(r)\) vanishes at critical points (where the trace of the stress-energy tensor is vanishing). In addition, it is also known that at critical points, \(\Theta\) vanishes and \[4\pi^2 \langle T(0) T(z) \rangle=\frac{c}{2z^4}, \label{7}\] where \(c\) is the central charge, and so \(4\pi^2 F(z\bar{z})=\frac{c}{2}\) at critical points. Note that the unusual \(4\pi^2\) factor is due to the normalization of the energy-momentum tensor chosen above, which differs from the standard normalization \(T(z,\bar{z})=-2\pi T_{zz}\) (see e.g. ). This means that \(c(s)\) as defined above satisfies all three requirements of Zamolodchikov's \(c\)-theorem. As powerful as this result is, one may wonder if a proof of existence of such an RG scaling function may be found under less stringent conditions. There is a wide class of QFTs in 1+1 dimensions which are non-unitary: in their usual CFT description in terms of Virasoro representations, negative-norm states exist. Yet in many cases the spectrum is real and bounded from below, and such QFTs describe *bona fide*, near-critical points of local quantum models with non-hermitian but positive-spectrum hamiltonian acting on a proper Hilbert space. A good example is the famous Lee-Yang model of CFT which describes the Lee-Yang edge singularity. It has an integrable massive QFT counterpart which leads to a perfectly reasonable QFT (a good discussion of non-unitarity and scattering theory in the context of massive integrable QFTs can be found in ). Several manifestly non-hermitian discrete implementations of the Lee-Yang model exist, such as the quantum spin chain studied in, which possesses an Ising critical point and a Lee-Yang critical line. A non-unitary QFT describing the near-critical region of this spin chain, including the Ising \(\mapsto\) Lee-Yang flow, was studied in. May we also define a \(c\)-function for these theories? If so, how can we establish that it is indeed a \(c\)-function without appealing to unitarity of the QFT? Non-unitary 1+1 dimensional CFTs abound (e.g. there are infinitely many examples within the minimal models of CFT) and much is known about their properties. A feature that has emerged in various contexts is that for such theories, the role of the central charge \(c\) is taken up by an effective central charge \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}:=c-24\Delta\) where \(\Delta\) is the smallest conformal dimension of the spectrum of local fields. For unitary theories \(\Delta=0\), corresponding to the identity field but for non-unitary models \(\Delta\) and \(c\) may both be negative in such a way as to give \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}\geq 0\). For instance, the ground state energy of a non-unitary CFT on the cylinder is proportional to \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}\) whereas for unitary theories it is proportional to \(c\). Similarly, the von Neumann entanglement entropy of connected sub-system in a 1+1 dimensional CFT diverges logarithmically with the size of the sub-system with a coefficient which is proportional to \(c\) in unitary theories and to \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}\) in non-unitary ones. These results all highlight the important role played by \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}\) at criticality for non-unitary CFTs. Furthermore, there are many known examples of RG flows between such CFTs with the property \[(c_{\mathrm{eff}})_{\rm UV}> (c_{\mathrm{eff}})_{\rm IR}, \label{order}\] hence generalising ([\[ineq\]](#ineq){reference-type="ref" reference="ineq"}) for non-unitary models.
:::
A particularly well-known family of non-unitary CFTs are the non-unitary minimal models, commonly denoted by \(\mathcal{M}_{p,q}\) with \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}=1-\frac{6}{pq}\), \(q>p+1\) and \(p, q\) coprime. RG flows between the non-unitary minimal models generated through perturbation by particular CFT fields have been investigated for a long time. Early examples of such flows were pointed out in. They proved that perturbation by a field \(\phi_{1,3}\) (the least relevant field of the theory), generates the family of flows \[\mathcal{M}_{p,q} + \phi_{1,3} \rightarrow \mathcal{M}_{2p-q,p}. \label{flow1}\] The proof relied on perturbation theory under the assumption that \(p/(q-p)\gg 1\). Further examples of RG flows amongst non-unitary minimal models have been found through the use of the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz (TBA) approach and its massless version. In particular, the families \[\begin{aligned}
&& \mathcal{M}_{p,2p-1} + \phi_{2,1} \rightarrow \mathcal{M}_{p-1,2p-1}\nonumber \\ && \mathcal{M}_{p,2p+1} + \phi_{1,5} \rightarrow \mathcal{M}_{p,2p-1} \label{flows2} \end{aligned}\] were proposed in and further studied in. As an example, the solid line in Fig. [\[typical\]](#typical){reference-type="ref" reference="typical"} shows the massless flow \(\mathcal{M}_{3,5} + \phi_{2,1} \rightarrow \mathcal{M}_{2,5}\) as presented in. A more general set of flows was proposed and explored in giving the following families: \[\begin{aligned}
&& \mathcal{M}_{p,q} + \phi_{2,1} \rightarrow \mathcal{M}_{q-p,q} \quad \mathrm{for} \quad p<q<2p \nonumber \\ && \mathcal{M}_{p,q} + \phi_{1,5} \rightarrow \mathcal{M}_{p,4p-q} \quad \mathrm{for} \quad 2p<q<3p \nonumber \\ && \mathcal{M}_{p,q} + \phi_{1,5} \rightarrow \mathcal{M}_{4p-q,p}\quad \mathrm{for} \quad 3p<q<4p. \label{flows3} \end{aligned}\] which contain some of the examples above but are more general. Within the TBA approach it is common to define a scaling function \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\mathrm{TBA}}(s)\) which for unitary theories has the same features as Zamolodchikov's \(c\)-function (even though they are distinct functions). The TBA scaling function has been evaluated for some of the flows listed above. In all cases the property ([\[order\]](#order){reference-type="ref" reference="order"}) is observed (and can be easily checked by simply evaluating \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}\) for the listed theories). Moreover, in many examples, such as the flows ([\[flows2\]](#flows2){reference-type="ref" reference="flows2"}), the TBA scaling function is monotonic, although this is not always the case. In addition to the massless flows ([\[flow1\]](#flow1){reference-type="ref" reference="flow1"})-([\[flows3\]](#flows3){reference-type="ref" reference="flows3"}) between nontrival non-unitary CFTs, there are also known examples of massless flows connecting unitary to non-unitary minimal models. An example is provided by the QFT studied in which may be described as implementing the flow \[\mathcal{M}_{3,4}+ \lambda_ 1\phi_{1,3}+i \lambda_2 \phi_{1,2} \mapsto \mathcal{M}_{2,5}\] with \(\lambda_{1,3}\in \mathbb{R}\). Here \(\mathcal{M}_{3,4}\) is the critical Ising model, \(\mathcal{M}_{3,4}+ \lambda_ 1\phi_{1,3}\) is the massive Ising model, \(i\lambda_2\phi_{1,2}\) represents an imaginary magnetic field, and the final theory (the IR point) is the critical Lee-Yang model. Finally, there are also examples of massive flows from a non-unitary minimal model to the trivial fixed point, \((c_{\mathrm{eff}})_{\mathrm{IR}}=0\). The dashed line in Fig. [\[typical\]](#typical){reference-type="ref" reference="typical"} shows the massive flow \[\mathcal{M}_{2,5}+i \lambda \phi_{1,2} \mapsto \{{\bf 1}\}\] with \(\lambda\in{\mathbb{R}}\), from the minimal Lee-Yang model described by its massive integrable QFT counterpart. The examples above make it reasonable to expect that a generalization of Zamolodchikov's \(c\)-theorem will give rise to a similar-looking "\(c_{\mathrm{eff}}\)-theorem". In this letter we show that a \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}\)-function exists with all the properties of Zamolodchikov's \(c\)-function. This is shown under the standard QFT properties of Poincaré invariance and locality, as well as *unbroken parity--time-reversal (\(\mathcal{PT}\)) symmetry*. At critical points, under certain additional natural assumptions which hold at least in rational models of CFT, this function equals the effective central charge. This thus shows that the space of \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetric CFTs is partially ordered by (\(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetric) RG flows, and that this order is characterized by [\[order\]](#order){reference-type="eqref" reference="order"}. Interestingly, there also exist examples of flows where the inequality ([\[order\]](#order){reference-type="ref" reference="order"}) is violated. We discuss how these may break some of the assumptions underlying our result in Section [5](#sectest){reference-type="ref" reference="sectest"}. The paper is organized as follows. In Section [2](#secgen){reference-type="ref" reference="secgen"} we recall some general facts about QFT in order to emphasize which results hold without unitarity, and we express the precise meaning of \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry we use in order to replace unitarity. In Section [3](#sechash){reference-type="ref" reference="sechash"} we derive some basic consequences including a reflection positivity statement, and we discuss aspects of locality. In Section [4](#secthm){reference-type="ref" reference="secthm"} we prove our main irreversibility theorem, following closely the steps of Zamolodchikov's original proof. Finally in Section [5](#sectest){reference-type="ref" reference="sectest"} we briefly discuss various examples, and we conclude in Section [6](#secconclu){reference-type="ref" reference="secconclu"}.
# Generalities and main assumptions {#secgen}
In this section, we establish the precise context in which we work, stating the assumptions and their immediate consequences. Except where otherwise stated, we work in real time with Minkowskian metric. There are three assumptions. The first two, Poincaré invariance and locality, are standard assumptions in relativistic QFT. The last one is \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry. If unbroken--that is, if there is a basis of states that are \(\mathcal{PT}\)-invariant--this symmetry guarantees the reality of the hamiltonian spectrum in non-hermitian quantum models. In our proof of irreversibility, we need both reality of spectra and the more dynamical statement of \(\mathcal{PT}\)-invariance of the stress-energy tensor.
## Poincaré invariance and locality
We consider a Hilbert space \({\cal H}\) on which we define a non-unitary quantum system. The Hilbert space has all appropriate structures, including a non-degenerate inner product which we denote with the usual Dirac bra-ket notation \(\langle v|w\rangle\), and an associated hermitian structure \({}^\dag\), with as usual \(|v\rangle^\dag = \langle v|\). The non-unitary quantum system is defined by its non-hermitian, diagonalizable hamiltonian \(H\), with \(H \neq H^\dagger\). Except for unitarity, other standard assumptions of relativistic QFT are made, which we review here for clarity. We assume translation invariance, with associated momentum operator \(P\) which satisfies \[=0.\] Space and time translations are effected as usual as \[{\cal O}(x,t) = e^{iHt-iPx}{\cal O} e^{-iHt+iPx}\] where we identify \({\cal O} = {\cal O}(0,0)\). As per the standard precepts of QFT, \(H\) and \(P\) are integrals of hamiltonian and momentum densities with locality properties: \[H=\int dx \, h(x,t), \quad P=\int dx \, p(x,t)\] with \[\label{hh} [h(x,t),h(y,t)] = [h(x,t),p(y,t)] = [p(x,t),p(y,t)]=0\quad \forall\;x\neq y,\quad \forall t\] A (homogeneous) local field \({\cal O}(x)={\cal O}(x,0)\) is an operator satisfying \([P,{\cal O}(x)]=i\partial_x{\cal O}(x)\), and such that \([h(x),{\cal O}(y)]=[p(x),{\cal O}(y)]=0\) for all \(x\neq y\). The usual locality arguments are assumed: let \({\cal O}(x)\) be local; then if \(\int \mathrm{d} x\,{\cal O}(x)=0\) then \({\cal O}(x) = \partial_x \t{\cal O}(x)\) for local \(\t{\cal O}(x)\); and if \(\partial_x {\cal O}(x) = 0\) then \({\cal O}(x)= a {\bf 1}\) for some constant \(a\in{\mathbb{C}}\). The above equations then imply the existence of local currents \(j(x,t)\) and \(k(x,t)\) such that \[\label{cur} \partial_t {h}(x,t)+\partial_x {j}(x,t)=0, \quad \partial_t {p}(x,t)+\partial_x {k}(x,t)=0.\] As usual, these hold inside correlation functions except at the space-time positions where other local fields are inserted, in which case \(\delta\)-type contact terms arise, see e.g. or any QFT textbook. We assume clustering of correlation functions, namely factorization of correlators of local fields at large space distances. We further assume Lorentz invariance. The basic condition of Lorentz invariance is the equality between the energy current and the momentum density, \[j=p.\] Then we can construct the boost operator \[B = \int \mathrm{d} x\,xh(x),\] which satisfies the correct relation for the (two-dimensional) Poincaré group, \[\label{bh} [B,H] = i\int \mathrm{d} x\,x \partial_th(x,t) =-i\int \mathrm{d} x\,x\partial_x p(x,t) = i\int \mathrm{d} x\,p(x,t) = iP\] and \[\label{bp} [B,P] =-i\int \mathrm{d} x\,x\partial_x h(x,t) = i H.\] These relations hold up to local densities at infinity. By the clustering property, such local densities at infinity do not contribute whenever the operators are appropriately exponentiated, for instance when acting on local observables by adjoint action, hence can be neglected. By using [\[bh\]](#bh){reference-type="eqref" reference="bh"}, [\[bp\]](#bp){reference-type="eqref" reference="bp"} as well as arguments based on locality, it is possible to deduce the following relations \(i[B,h] =-2p\), \(i[B,k]=-2p\) and \(i[B,p]=-h-k\), up to derivatives of local fields. In the standard form of the stress-energy tensor, these derivatives are assumed to be zero (see a discussion of the stress-energy tensor in ). Since such fundamental relations are not expected to be based on unitarity, here we assume that they hold. Let \(z=x-t\) and \(\bar{z}=x+t\). By the Poincaré algebra, in general we have \[e^{i\alpha B}{\cal O}(z,\b z)e^{-i\alpha B} = (e^{i\alpha B}{\cal O} e^{-i\alpha B}) (e^{-\alpha} z,e^{\alpha} \b z).\] Following the usual construction, consider the operators \[\begin{aligned}
{\tau}(z,\bar{z})&=&\frac{h(x,t)+k(x,t)+2p(x,t)}{4}\nonumber\\ \bar{\tau}(z,\bar{z})&=&\frac{h(x,t)+k(x,t)-2p(x,t)}{4}\nonumber\\ \theta(z,\bar{z})&=&k(x,t)-h(x,t). \label{operators} \end{aligned}\] These have spin 2,-2 and 0 respectively, \[\label{btau} i[B,\tau] =-2\tau,\quad i[B,\b \tau] = 2\b\tau,\quad i[B,\theta]=0,\] from which we find the standard transformation properties, \[\label{Btrans} e^{i\alpha B}\tau e^{-i\alpha B} = e^{-2\alpha}\tau,\quad e^{i\alpha B}\b\tau e^{-i\alpha B} = e^{-2\alpha}\b\tau,\quad e^{i\alpha B}\theta e^{-i\alpha B} = \theta.\] These operators satisfy \[\label{curb} \partial \bar{\tau}+\frac{1}{4}\bar{\partial}\theta=0 \quad\mbox{and} \quad \bar{\partial}\tau +\frac{1}{4}\partial \theta=0\] where \(\partial = \partial/\partial z\) and \(\b\partial = \partial/\partial\b z\).
## \(\mathcal{PT}\) symmetry and real spectra
The core of our derivation of the \(c_\mathrm{eff}\) theorem is the reality of the hamiltonian and momentum spectra, as well as \(\mathcal{PT}\)-invariance of the stress-energy tensor and of the ground state. For a \(\mathcal{PT}\)-invariant diagonalizable hamiltonian, the statement that all its eigenstates have real eigenvalues is equivalent to the statement that one can choose a basis of \(\mathcal{PT}\)-invariant eigenstates (that is, to the statement that \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry is not spontaneously broken)[^2]. The simple idea that unbroken \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry guarantees the reality of the energy spectrum even if a hamiltonian is non-hermitian is at the heart of an active area of research. The ideas underpinning this research go back to the early days of quantum mechanics when it was realized that hermiticity of the hamiltonian is not strictly required in order to define a meaningful quantum mechanical model. The area has been popularized more recently thanks to a great extent to the pioneering work in which a family of non-hermitian quantum mechanical hamitonians was shown to exhibit real energy spectrum. Various reviews of the field can be found in. More recent developments are covered in the special issue. Parity invariance is the transformation \(x\rightarrow-x\), equivalently \(z\leftrightarrow-\bar{z}\). Time reversal is the operation of complex conjugation of coefficients of states and operators as written in a chosen basis (the choice of the basis defines the time reversal operation). The combination is the operation \(\mathcal{PT}\), which we will see (by a slight abuse of notation) as acting on operators and on vectors and co-vectors. We understand this operation as an anti-linear involution of the operator algebra, which preserves the inner product up to complex conjugation, \(\mathcal{PT}(\langle v|)\mathcal{PT}(|w\rangle) = \langle v|w\rangle^*\), and which preserves the momentum operator, \[\label{PTP} \mathcal{PT}(P) = P.\] Our basic dynamical assumption is that *the stress-energy tensor is \(\mathcal{PT}\)-invariant*. That is, we assume \[\label{PTass} \mathcal{PT}(h(0,0)) = h(0,0),\quad \mathcal{PT}(p(0,0)) = p(0,0),\quad \mathcal{PT}(k(0,0)) = k(0,0).\] Thanks to [\[PTP\]](#PTP){reference-type="eqref" reference="PTP"} and anti-linearity this implies \(\mathcal{PT}(h(x,0)) = h(-x,0)\), hence \(\mathcal{PT}(H) = H\), and therefore \[\label{PTh} \mathcal{PT}(h(x,t)) = h(-x,-t),\quad \mathcal{PT}(p(x,t)) = p(-x,-t),\quad \mathcal{PT}(k(x,t)) = k(-x,-t).\] Consider the simultaneous right-eigenvalue equations for the hamiltonian and momentum operator, \(H|R_n\rangle = E_n|R_n\rangle\) and \(P|R_n\rangle = p_n|R_n\rangle\). We further assume that *all eigenvalues \(E_n\) and \(p_n\) are real*, or equivalently that *all eigenstates \(|R_n\rangle\) are \(\mathcal{PT}\)-invariant* (unbroken \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry). We also assume, as usual in QFT, the set \(\{E_n\}\) to be bounded from below, and the lowest-energy state \(|R_0\rangle\) to be unique; by appropriate identity-shift of \(H\) and \(P\), we choose it to have zero energy and momentum, \(E_0=p_0=0\). Note that by Lorentz invariance in QFT, we must have \(E_n \geq |p_n|\). Denoting by \(\langle L_n|\) the simultaneous left-eigenvectors for the hamiltonian and momentum operator, we therefore have \[\label{Heq} H \neq H^\dagger, \quad H |R_n\rangle= E_n |R_n\rangle \quad \mathrm{and} \quad \langle L_n|H= E_n \langle L_n|,\quad E_n\in{\mathbb{R}}\] and \[\label{Peq} P|R_n\rangle = p_n|R_n\rangle \quad \mathrm{and} \quad \langle L_n|P= p_n \langle L_n|,\quad p_n\in{\mathbb{R}}.\] It follows that \(H^\dagger |L_n\rangle= E_n |L_n\rangle\) and \(\langle R_n|H^\dagger= E_n \langle R_n|\). The vector \(|R_n\rangle\) and co-vector \(\langle L_n|\) are the right and left eigenvectors, respectively, of the hamiltonian \(H\). For \(H\) non-hermitian we have in general that \(|R_n \rangle^\dagger \neq \langle L_n|\), and the vectors \(|R_n\rangle\) and \(| R_m\rangle\) are not orthogonal under the Hilbert space structure, \(\langle R_m|R_n\rangle\neq \delta_{nm}\). However, we may construct our basis in such a way as to have \[\langle L_n| R_m\rangle =\delta_{nm}.\] In the context of non-hermitian quantum mechanics this is termed a biorthogonal basis. In particular, we have \[\label{decomp} {\bf{1}}=\sum_n |R_n \rangle \langle L_n|.\] We choose the vectors \(|R_m\rangle\) and \(|L_m\rangle\) as such. Note that both are \(\mathcal{PT}\)-invariant. That is, \[\mathcal{PT}(|R_n\rangle) = |R_n\rangle,\quad \mathcal{PT}(\langle L_n|) = \langle L_n|.\]
# The hash operation and reflection positivity {#sechash}
In unitary models, the hermitian conjugation of the Hilbert space guarantees a very important property, at the basis of the ordinary \(c\)-theorem: reflection positivity. For non-hermitian hamiltonians, this does not hold anymore. However, in the theory of \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetric quantum mechanics, it is known that when \(\mathcal{PT}\) symmetry is not broken, a similarity transformation exists which relates the hamiltonian to a hermitian counterpart[^3]. With this new hermitian structure, the usual results of quantum mechanics hold. In the present context, it is important to specify how this new hermitian structure interacts with locality and Poincaré invariance.
## Hash operation
Instead of exhibiting the explicit similarity transformation, we instead define the \({}^\#\) operation on \({\rm End}({\cal H})\), which plays the role of the new hermitian conjugation. Let \({\cal O}\in {\rm End}({\cal H})\) be an operator on the Hilbert space. Then \({\cal O}^\#\) is defined by the relation \[\label{hash} \langle L_m| {\mathcal{O}}^{\#} |R_n \rangle:= \langle L_n| {\mathcal{O}} |R_m \rangle^*= \langle R_m| {\mathcal{O}}^\dagger |L_n \rangle\] (where we recall that \({}^*\) is complex conjugation). It is a simple matter to see that the hash operation is an antilinear involution, and further that \[\label{o1o2} ({\cal O}_1 {\cal O}_2)^\# = {\cal O}_2^\# {\cal O}_1^\#.\] The latter is derived as follows: \[\begin{aligned}
\langle L_m| (\mathcal{O}_1\mathcal{O}_2)^{\#} |R_n \rangle &=& \langle L_n| \mathcal{O}_1 \mathcal{O}_2 |R_m \rangle^* = \lt(\sum_k \langle L_n| \mathcal{O}_1|R_k\rangle \langle L_k| \mathcal{O}_2 |R_m \rangle\rt)^* \nonumber\\ &=& \sum_k \langle L_k| \mathcal{O}_1^\#|R_n\rangle \langle L_m| \mathcal{O}_2^\# |R_k \rangle = \langle L_m| \mathcal{O}_2^\# \mathcal{O}_1^\# |R_n \rangle. \end{aligned}\] Also, thanks to reality of spectra, we find that \(\langle L_m| {H}^{\#} |R_n \rangle= \langle R_m| {H}^\dagger |L_n \rangle=E_n \delta_{m,n}=\langle L_m| {H} |R_n \rangle\) and similarly for \(P\), and thus \[\label{hphash} {H}^{\#}=H\quad\mathrm{and}\quad P^\# = P.\] In particular, \[\label{oxt} {\cal O}(x,t)^\# = (e^{iHt-iPx}{\cal O}(0,0)e^{-iHt+iPx})^\# = e^{iHt-iPx}{\cal O}(0,0)^\# e^{-iHt+iPx} = {\cal O}^\#(x,t).\] The hash operation may also be defined as an antilinear operation from \(\mathcal H\) to its dual \(\mathcal H^*\), and vice versa. Consistency with the above definition on operators implies \[|R_n\rangle^\# = \langle L_n|,\quad \langle L_n|^\# = |R_n\rangle.\] From this and the fact that the basis states \(|R_n\rangle\) and \(\langle L_n|\) are \(\mathcal{PT}\)-invariant, we see that \(^\#\), as acting on \(\mathcal H\) and as acting \(\mathcal H^*\), commutes with \(\mathcal{PT}\). Therefore, it does so as well as acting on \({\rm End}(\mathcal{H})\): \[\label{PThash} \mathcal{PT}({\cal O}^\#) = \mathcal{PT}({\cal O})^\#.\]
## Reflection positivity
Let us now consider a generic ground-state two-point function \(\langle L_0| {{\cal O}}_1(x_1,t_1) {\cal O}_2(x_2,t_2)|R_0\rangle\) of some operators \({\cal O}_1,\, {\cal O}_2\). Using the decomposition of the identity [\[decomp\]](#decomp){reference-type="eqref" reference="decomp"} as well as [\[Peq\]](#Peq){reference-type="eqref" reference="Peq"} and [\[Heq\]](#Heq){reference-type="eqref" reference="Heq"}, we find that it is a function of time and position differences only: \[\langle L_0| {{\cal O}}_1(x_1,t_1) {\cal O}_2(x_2,t_2)|R_0\rangle=\sum_n e^{-i(t_1-t_2)E_n + i(x_1-x_2)p_n} \langle L_0| {{\cal O}}_1| R_n\rangle \langle L_n| {\cal O}_2|R_0\rangle.\] Using [\[hash\]](#hash){reference-type="eqref" reference="hash"}, [\[o1o2\]](#o1o2){reference-type="eqref" reference="o1o2"} and [\[oxt\]](#oxt){reference-type="eqref" reference="oxt"}, we also see that \[\langle L_0| {{\cal O}}_1(x_1,t_1) {\cal O}_2(x_2,t_2)|R_0\rangle=\langle L_0| {{\cal O}}_2^{\#}(x_2,t_2) {\cal O}_1^{\#}(x_1,t_1)|R_0\rangle^*. \label{rel1}\] Finally, consider the time-dependent two-point function of \({\mathcal{O}}^{\#}\) and \(\mathcal{O}\) in imaginary time \(t=-iy,\;y\in{\mathbb{R}}\), in the ground state of the theory, \[\langle L_0|{\mathcal{O}}^{\#} (x,-iy) \mathcal{O}(x,0) |R_0\rangle=\langle L_0|e^{-y H}{\mathcal{O}}^{\#} (x,0)e^{y H} \mathcal{O}(x,0) |R_0\rangle=\langle L_0|{\mathcal{O}}^{\#}(x,0)e^{y H} \mathcal{O}(x,0) |R_0\rangle.\] Using [\[decomp\]](#decomp){reference-type="eqref" reference="decomp"} we write \[\langle L_0|{\mathcal{O}}^{\#}(x,-iy) \mathcal{O}(x,0) |R_0\rangle=\sum_n e^{y E_n} \langle L_0| {\mathcal{O}}^{\#}(x,0) |R_n \rangle \langle L_n| {\mathcal{O}}(x,0) |R_0 \rangle.\] Thanks to [\[hash\]](#hash){reference-type="eqref" reference="hash"}, this sum is *positive-(semi)definite*: \[\label{pos} \langle L_0|{\mathcal{O}}^{\#}(x,-iy) \mathcal{O}(x,0) |R_0\rangle \geq0\] (equality occurs for some value of \(y\), if and only if all correlation functions involving \({\cal O}(x,t)\) vanish). This is reflection positivity.
## Hash-locality and conserved currents
Since \(H\) and \(P\) are invariant under the hash operation, it is clear that the relations defining locality (see the discussion below [\[hh\]](#hh){reference-type="eqref" reference="hh"}) may be hashed, keeping invariant the position \(x\). We may therefore distinguish two classes of locality, both associated to the same real space parameterized by \(x\): *locality* and *hash-locality*, the first with respect to \(h(x)\) and \(p(x)\), the second to \(h^\#(x)\) and \(p^\#(x)\). Hashing [\[cur\]](#cur){reference-type="eqref" reference="cur"}, we have \[\label{curhash} \partial_t {h}^{\#}(x,t)+\partial_x {j}^{\#}(x,t)=0, \quad \partial_t {p}^{\#}(x,t)+\partial_x {k}^{\#}(x,t)=0,\] where all fields are hash-local. Relations [\[curhash\]](#curhash){reference-type="eqref" reference="curhash"} hold in correlation functions except at space-time positions \((x,t)\) at which other hash-local fields are inserted, where additional standard contributions in the form of \(\delta\)-function contact terms will arise. Passing to the \(\tau^\#\), \(\b\tau^\#\) and \(\theta^\#\) fields, these equations are \[\label{hashcurb} \partial \bar{\tau}^\#+\frac{1}{4}\bar{\partial} \theta^\#=0\quad\mbox{and} \quad \bar{\partial}\tau^\# +\frac{1}{4}\partial \theta^\#=0.\] It will be important below to consider mixed correlation functions, \(\langle L_0|{\cal O}_1^\#(x,t){\cal O}_2(0,0)|R_0\rangle\) for local \({\cal O}_2\) and hash-local \({\cal O}_1^\#\). Clearly, local fields are not necessarily hash-local, and can be hash-supported on extended regions. Yet, since conservations equations hold if the fields are time-separated, relations [\[curhash\]](#curhash){reference-type="eqref" reference="curhash"} still hold in correlation functions with insertion of local fields at times different from \(t\).
## Spin
By hashing [\[btau\]](#btau){reference-type="eqref" reference="btau"}, it is clear that the hash-local fields \(\tau^\#\), \(\b\tau^\#\) and \(\theta^\#\) have hash-spin 2, \(-2\) and 0. However, in order to determine the space-time dependence of two-point functions involving a mixture of local and hash-local fields, we need to have a common notion of spin for both types of locality. Thanks to \(H^\#=H\) and \(P^\#=P\), the Poincaré algebra implies \([H,B-B^\#]=[P,B-B^\#]=0\). It is in fact natural to assume hash-invariance of all Poincaré generators, imposing \(B^\#=B\) and thus a single notion of spin. In order to justify this assumption, we provide general arguments that indeed lead to \(B^\#=B\) for the boost operator. Let us parametrize the energy and momentum eigenvalues of a right eigenstate \(|R_n\rangle\) by \(m_n\cosh\theta_n\) and \(m_n\sinh\theta_n\) respectively[^4], for some \(m_n > 0\) and \(\theta_n\in{\mathbb{R}}\). This can always be done by positivity of the \(H\) spectrum and reality of the \(P\) spectrum if \(E_n>|p_n|\); in the case \(E_n=|p_n|\) ("massless states\"), an alternative parametrization can be used, without affecting the argument[^5]. Its boost \(e^{i\alpha B}|R_n\rangle\) by the rapidity \(\alpha\in{\mathbb{R}}\) also is a right eigenstate, with energy and momentum eigenvalues \(m_n\cosh(\theta_n+\alpha)\) and \(m_n\sinh(\theta_n+\alpha)\) respectively. Therefore, we may always bring its momentum to 0. The same holds for the boost of the left eigenstate \(\langle L_n|e^{-i\alpha B^\#}\). Let us change the labeling, and use the symbols \(|R_n,0\rangle\) in order to label a basis of independent center-of-momentum right eigenstates and \(\langle L_n,0|\) the corresponding orthogonal left eigenstates, \(\langle L_n,0|R_m,0\rangle = \delta_{m,n}\) and \(P|R_n,0\rangle = 0\), \(\langle L_n,0|P = 0\). Let us define the states \(|R_n,\alpha\rangle := e^{i\alpha B}|R_n,0\rangle\) and \(\langle L_n,\alpha|:=\langle L_n,0|e^{-i\alpha B^\#}\) for all \(n\) and all \(\alpha\in{\mathbb{R}}\). By the above discussion the set of states \(\{|R_n,\alpha\rangle\}\) span the Hilbert space, and \(\{\langle L_n,\alpha|\}\) spans its dual. Let us now consider the Fourier transforms \[|R_n,\omega\rangle\ket = \int d\alpha\,e^{-i\omega\alpha}|R_n,\alpha\rangle,\quad \langle\bra L_n,\omega| = \int d\alpha\,e^{i\omega\alpha}\langle L_n,\alpha|\] for \(\omega\in{\mathbb{R}}\). Note that, since real boosts \(\alpha\in{\mathbb{R}}\) are used, it is important that \(\omega\) be real for existence of the integrals[^6]. Since the Fourier transform is invertible, these states span the Hilbert space and its dual respectively, or at least dense subsets of these. Since \(B|R_n,\alpha\rangle =-i\partial_\alpha|R_n,\alpha\rangle\) and \(\langle L_n,\alpha|B^\# = i\partial_\alpha\langle L_n,\alpha|\), they right-and left-diagonalize \(B\) and \(B^\#\) respectively, \[B|R_n,\omega\rangle\ket = \omega |R_n,\omega\rangle\ket,\quad \langle\bra L_n,\omega| B^\# = \omega \langle\bra L_n,\omega|.\] Therefore, \[\langle\bra L_n,\omega|B|R_m,\nu\rangle\ket = \omega \langle\bra L_n,\omega|R_m,\nu\rangle\ket = \langle\bra L_n,\omega|B^\#|R_m,\nu\rangle\ket\] for all \(n,m\) and \(\omega,\nu\). Since the vectors and covectors span (dense subsets of) the Hilbert space and its dual, we conclude that \(B=B^\#\). As a consequence, \[\label{Btranshash} e^{i\alpha B}\tau^\# e^{-i\alpha B} = e^{-2\alpha}\tau^\#,\quad e^{i\alpha B}\b\tau^\# e^{-i\alpha B} = e^{-2\alpha}\b\tau^\#,\quad e^{i\alpha B}\theta^\# e^{-i\alpha B} = \theta^\#.\]
# Irreversibility theorem {#secthm}
The irreversibility theorem is composed of two parts. The first part is the proof that a certain function \(c_\mathrm{eff}(s)\) monotonically decreases along the RG flow (where \(s\) is the log of the RG distance scale). This follows very closely Zamolodchikov's proof. The function is defined in terms of two-point functions involving stress-energy tensor components and their hash counterparts. Reflection positivity, \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry, and the fact that the Poincaré group is hash-invariant (\(H^\#=H\), \(P^\#=P\) and \(B^\#=B\)) are used in a fundamental way. The function strictly decreases from its initial (UV) to its final (IR) point, unless the trace of the stress-energy tensor \(\theta(x,t)\) vanishes, in which case the function is constant. The second part aims at identifying \(c_\mathrm{eff}(s)\) at fixed points. This is based on an independent argument, using the critical specific free energy. It is known that, in many models of CFT including all rational models, the specific free energy is proportional to the CFT effective central charge \(c_\mathrm{eff} = c-24\Delta\), where \(c\) is the central charge and \(\Delta\) is the lowest dimension of the spectrum of local fields (in non-rational, non-compact models the choice of \(\Delta\) may be more delicate). Thus, we identify \[c(\infty) = c_\mathrm{IR}-24\Delta_\mathrm{IR}\qquad\mbox{and}\qquad c(-\infty) = c_\mathrm{UV}-24\Delta_\mathrm{UV}.\]
## A monotonic function
We first define the operation of taking the "real part", or hash-invariant part, of an operator: \[A^{\mathsf R} = \frc{A+A^\#}2.\] Clearly \((A^{\mathsf R})^\# = A^{\mathsf R}\). In the spirit of Zamolodchikov's original proof of the \(c\)-theorem, we then define the correlators: \[\begin{aligned}
&&f(z\bar{z}):= z^4 \langle L_0| \tau^{\mathsf R}(z, \bar{z}) \tau^{\mathsf R}(0,0)|R_0 \rangle,\qquad \,\, \,\,\,\bar{f}(z\bar{z}):= \bar{z}^4 \langle L_0| \bar{\tau}^{\mathsf R}(z, \bar{z}) \bar{\tau}^{\mathsf R}(0,0)|R_0 \rangle,\nonumber\\ &&g_1(z\bar{z}):=z^3 \bar{z}\langle L_0| \tau^{\mathsf R}(z, \bar{z})\theta^{\mathsf R}(0,0) |R_0\rangle, \qquad \bar{g}_1(z\bar{z}):=\bar{z}^3 {z}\langle L_0| \bar{\tau}^{\mathsf R}(z, \bar{z})\theta^{\mathsf R}(0,0) |R_0\rangle, \nonumber\\ && g_2(z\bar{z}):=z^3 \bar{z}\langle L_0| \theta^{\mathsf R}(z, \bar{z})\tau^{\mathsf R}(0,0) |R_0\rangle, \qquad \bar{g}_2(z\bar{z}):=\bar{z}^3 {z}\langle L_0| {\theta}^{\mathsf R}(z, \bar{z})\bar{\tau}^{\mathsf R}(0,0) |R_0\rangle, \nonumber\\ && q(z\bar{z}):= z^2 \bar{z}^2 \langle L_0| \theta^{\mathsf R} (z, \bar{z})\theta^{\mathsf R}(0,0) |R_0 \rangle. \label{fgh2} \end{aligned}\] The fact that all these functions depend on \(z\b z\) is a consequence of [\[Btrans\]](#Btrans){reference-type="eqref" reference="Btrans"} and [\[Btranshash\]](#Btranshash){reference-type="eqref" reference="Btranshash"}. Here and below we consider space-like distances \(z\b z>0\). Thanks to [\[curb\]](#curb){reference-type="eqref" reference="curb"} and [\[hashcurb\]](#hashcurb){reference-type="eqref" reference="hashcurb"}, there are various relations between the derivatives of these correlators, which hold for all \(z\neq \b z\): \[\bar{z}\bar{\partial} f+\frac{z}{4} \partial g_2=\frac{3}{4} g_2 \quad \mathrm{and} \quad {z}{\partial} \bar{f}+\frac{\bar{z}}{4} \bar\partial \bar{g}_2=\frac{3}{4} \bar{g}_2,\] as well as \[\bar{z}\bar{\partial} g_1+\frac{z}{4} \partial q=g_1+\frac{1}{2}q \quad \mathrm{and} \quad {z}{\partial} \bar{g}_1+\frac{\bar{z}}{4} \bar{\partial} q=\bar{g}_1+\frac{1}{2}q.\] These are identical to the relations found by Zamolodchikov if we identify \(g_{1}=\bar{g}_1=g_2=\bar{g}_2\) and \(f=\bar{f}\). However, in general these identifications do not all hold in the present case. We may combine the relations above to write: \[\bar{z}\bar{\partial} f+{z}{\partial} \bar{f}+\frac{z}{4} (\partial g_2-3\partial \bar{g}_1)+\frac{\bar{z}}{4} (\bar\partial \bar{g}_2-3\bar\partial {g}_1)-\frac{3}{16} (z\partial+\bar{z}\bar{\partial}) q=\frac{3}{4}(g_2-g_1+\bar{g}_2-\bar{g}_1-q).\] We may now use \(\mathcal{PT}\) symmetry to show that \(g_1=g_2\) and \(\bar{g}_1=\bar{g}_2\). By translation invariance, hash-invariance of \(\tau^{\mathsf R}\) and \(\theta^{\mathsf R}\), and [\[rel1\]](#rel1){reference-type="eqref" reference="rel1"}, it follows that \[\langle L_0| \tau^{\mathsf R}(z,\b z)\theta^{\mathsf R}(0,0) |R_0\rangle =\langle L_0| \tau^{\mathsf R}(0,0)\theta^{\mathsf R}(-z,-\bar{z}) |R_0\rangle=\langle L_0| \theta^{\mathsf R}(-z,-\bar{z})\tau^{\mathsf R}(0, 0) |R_0\rangle^*.\] Using \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry [\[PTh\]](#PTh){reference-type="eqref" reference="PTh"} and [\[PThash\]](#PThash){reference-type="eqref" reference="PThash"}, we have \[\begin{aligned}
\langle L_0| \theta^{\mathsf R}(-z,-\bar{z})\tau^{\mathsf R}(0, 0) |R_0\rangle^* &=& \mathcal{PT}(\langle L_0|)\,\mathcal{PT}(\theta^{\mathsf R}(-z,-\b{z}))\,\mathcal{PT}(\tau^{\mathsf R}(0, 0))\,\mathcal{PT}(|R_0\rangle) \nonumber\\ &=& \langle L_0|\theta^{\mathsf R}(z,\b{z})\tau^{\mathsf R}(0, 0)|R_0\rangle. \end{aligned}\] This implies \(g_1=g_2\). The same reasoning may be applied to \(\bar{g}_1\) to show that \(\bar{g}_1=\bar{g}_2\). Using this, the equation above simplifies to: \[\bar{z}\bar{\partial} f+{z}{\partial} \bar{f}+\frac{z}{4} (\partial g_1-3\partial \bar{g}_1)+\frac{\bar{z}}{4} (\bar\partial \bar{g}_1-3\bar\partial {g}_1)-\frac{3}{16} (z\partial+\bar{z}\bar{\partial}) q=-\frac{3}{4}q.\] We may now change variables to polar coordinates by writing \(z=r e^{\theta}\), \(\bar{z}=r e^{-\theta}\), with \(r>0\). We then have that \(2 z \partial = r\partial_r + \partial_\theta\) and \(2\bar{z}\bar\partial=r\partial_r-\partial_\theta\), and: \[\frac{1}{2} r\partial_r\left(f+\bar{f}-\frac{1}{2}(g_1+\bar{g}_1)-\frac{3}{8} q\right)-\frac{1}{2} \partial_\theta \left(\bar{f}-f +\bar{g}_1-g_1\right)=-\frac{3}{4}q.\] Given that all functions involved are functions of \(z\bar{z}=r^2\) only, it follows that the \(\theta\)-derivative must be zero, thus the equation simplifies to: \[r\partial_r\left(f+\bar{f}-\frac{1}{2}(g_1+\bar{g}_1)-\frac{3}{8} q\right)=-\frac{3}{2}q,\] or, introducing the standard RG parameter \(s=2\log(mr)\) (where \(m\) is an energy scale) we can write: \[\frac{d}{ds}\left(f+\bar{f}-\frac{1}{2}(g_1+\bar{g}_1)-\frac{3}{8} q\right)=-\frac{3}{4}q.\] This now takes almost exactly the same form as Zamolodchikov's \(c\)-theorem. We may now define a function \[c_{\mathrm{eff}}(s):= 4\pi^2\left( f(r)+\bar{f}(r)-\frac{1}{2}(g_1(r)+\bar{g}_1(r))-\frac{3}{8}q(r)\right), \label{defcef}\] which satisfies the equation \[\label{dc} \frac{dc_{\mathrm{eff}}}{ds}=-3\pi^2 q(r).\] The factor \((2\pi)^2\) in ([\[defcef\]](#defcef){reference-type="ref" reference="defcef"}) is introduced in order to reestablish the standard conformal normalization of the fields \(\tau, \bar{\tau}\) and \(\theta\) which, as shown in the paragraph before equation ([\[7\]](#7){reference-type="ref" reference="7"}), usually involves an extra factor \(-2\pi\). Consider the function \(q(r)\). Its values for all \(r>0\) may be obtained from the analytic continuation of the correlator \(\langle L_0|\theta^{\mathsf R}(z,\b z)\theta^{\mathsf R}(0,0)|R_0\rangle\) to purely imaginary times \(t=-iy\) (recall that \(z=x-t\) and \(\b z=x+t\)). The inequality \(q(r) \geq 0\) follows from reflection positivity [\[pos\]](#pos){reference-type="eqref" reference="pos"}. Thus, if \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}(s)\) is complex, then its imaginary part is in fact independent of \(s\), and its real part is strictly monotonically decreasing except when \(q(r)\) is zero. By [\[pos\]](#pos){reference-type="eqref" reference="pos"}, it is clear that \(q(r)\) vanishes for some \(r\) if and only if it does so for all \(r>0\), and this happens if and only if \(\langle L_n|\theta|R_0\rangle=0\) for all \(n\). In this case all vacuum correlation functions involving the trace of the stress-energy tensor vanish, and thus we may set it to zero. That is, either the real part of \(c_\mathrm{eff}(s)\) is strictly monotonically decreasing as \(s\) increases from \(-\infty\) to \(\infty\), or it is constant for all \(s\) and \(\theta(x,t)=0\). As usual, we assume that the limits \(\lim_{s\to\pm\infty}c_\mathrm{eff}(s)\) exist, and that these correspond to the UV and IR quantum critical points, at which scale invariance holds and thus the trace of the energy-momentum tensor vanishes. At these points, \(g_1=\b g_1=0\). By analytic continuation to imaginary times, one shows by similar arguments as above that \(f\) and \(\b f\) are real and non-negative. Therefore, \(c_\mathrm{eff}(\pm\infty)\geq 0\), and combining with [\[dc\]](#dc){reference-type="eqref" reference="dc"}, this implies that \(c_\mathrm{eff}(s)\geq 0\) Thus we have established the existence of a function \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}(s)\) of the renormalization group parameter \(s\) which is non-negative and monotonically decreasing along renormalization group flows, with \[c_\mathrm{eff}(-\infty) \geq c_\mathrm{eff}(\infty)\] (there is equality if and only if \(\theta(x,t)=0\), in which case \(c_\mathrm{eff}(s)\) is independent of \(s\)). This is irreversibility of the RG flow. The only missing bit of the puzzle is the determination of the values \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}(\pm\infty)\), at the IR and UV quantum critical points. From the definitions above these are given by the correlator \(4\pi^2(f(r_*)+\bar{f}(r_*))\) at \(r_*=0\) or \(r_*=\infty\). In contrast to the unitary case, however, we do not immediately know these values as we do not have explicit expressions for the operators \(\tau, \tau^\#\) within the standard CFT framework. We thus need to resort to a different strategy. In fact, even for unitary theories, the result above is slightly more general, as it does not assume that \(f=\bar{f}\) and \(g_1=\bar{g}_1\). Indeed, there exist CFTs (even unitary ones) where the left and right central charges may be different. In such cases \(f\neq \bar{f}\) and \(g_1\neq \bar{g}_1\). As expected even for those theories there is an irreversibility theorem, which, following the reasoning here, would be a "\(c+\bar{c}\)-theorem\" where the value of the scaling function at critical points would be \(\frac{c+\bar{c}}{2}\). Having \(c\neq \bar{c}\) means that the theory is not separately parity and time-reversal invariant, even if it is \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetric[^7]. Different choices of the functions \(f, \b f, g_i, \b g_i\) and \(q\) are possible. For instance, we could have used \(f(z\b z) = z^4 \langle L_0|\tau^\#(z,\b z)\tau(0,0)|R_0\rangle\), etc., with the same result. These may simply be different monotonic functions along the RG flow. For the argument presented in the next section, the choice used here is more convenient.
## Connection with the CFT effective central charge
In order to evaluate the values of \(c_\mathrm{eff}(\pm\infty)\), we need to calculate the function \(4\pi^2(f(r)+\bar{f}(r))\) in a CFT. The statement of scale invariance is the vanishing of the trace of the stress-energy tensor, \[\theta(x,t)=0.\] From this alone, it is possible to conclude that chiral factorization occurs, and that \(f(r)\) and \(\b f(r)\) are constant. In order to emphasize that these arguments do not depend on unitarity, we repeat them briefly here. First, equations [\[curb\]](#curb){reference-type="eqref" reference="curb"} and the similar relations for hash-fields imply that in any correlation function, \(\tau\) and \(\tau^\#\) are solely functions of \(z\), and \(\b\tau\) and \(\b\tau^\#\) functions of \(\b z\) (this is true, as usual, except at the space-time positions of other local or hash-local field insertions). Second, suppose a state \(\langle\cdots\rangle\) is space-time translation invariant and clustering at large distance. Then, \[\begin{aligned}
&& \langle \tau(x,0) \b\tau(x',0)\rangle = \lim_{t\to\infty} \langle\tau(x,t) \b\tau(x',t)\rangle \nonumber\\ && = \lim_{t\to\infty} \langle \tau(x-t,0) \b\tau(x'+t,0)\rangle = \langle \tau(0,0)\rangle\,\langle \b\tau(0,0)\rangle. \label{chiral} \end{aligned}\] This is (a part of) chiral factorization. Third, using the fact that \(\langle L_0|\tau^{\mathsf R}(z,\b z)\tau^{\mathsf R}(0)|R_0\rangle\) (resp. \(\langle L_0|\b \tau^{\mathsf R}(z,\b z)\b \tau^{\mathsf R}(0)|R_0\rangle\)) only depends on \(z\) (resp. \(\b z\)) for all \(z\neq\b z\), and that the ground state is Lorentz invariant, the unique one-parameter solutions to [\[Btrans\]](#Btrans){reference-type="eqref" reference="Btrans"} are \[\label{gsres} \langle L_0|\tau^{\mathsf R}(z,\b z)\tau^{\mathsf R}(0)|R_0\rangle = A z^{-4}, \quad \langle L_0|\b \tau^{\mathsf R}(z,\b z)\tau^{\mathsf R}(0)|R_0\rangle = \b A\b z^{-4}\] for some constants \(A\), \(\b A\). This shows that \(f(r)\) and \(\b f(r)\) are indeed constants. In the following, we will use the standard notation \(\tau(z) = \tau(z,\b z)\) and \(\b\tau(\b z) = \b \tau(z,\b z)\) (similarly for hashed fields) in order to emphasize chirality. We will also understand the variables \(z\) and \(\b z\) as complex variables (complex conjugate of each other), and use Euclidean, imaginary-time fields. Therefore \(\tau(z)\) is holomorphic and \(\b \tau(z)\) is anti-holomorphic, except at positions of other fields insertions, where singularities may occur. Consider the partition function of a CFT at finite temperature \(T=\beta^{-1}\) in a system of length \(\ell\), \[Z=\sum_n e^{-\beta E_n(\ell)}.\] It was shown in, and then generalized to non-unitary models that, at least for minimal models of CFT, the specific free energy is given by: \[\label{Z} \lim_{\ell \rightarrow \infty} \ell^{-1} \log Z=f_0\beta +\frac{\pi(c_{\mathrm{eff}}+\bar{c}_{\mathrm{eff}})}{12 \beta}\] where \(f_0\) is an energy per unit length, and \[\label{ceffcft} c_\mathrm{eff} = c-24\Delta,\quad \b c_\mathrm{eff} = \b c-24\b\Delta,\] with \(c\) (resp. \(\b c\)) the holomorphic (resp. antiholomorphic) central charge and \(\Delta\) (resp. \(\b\Delta\)) the lowest holomorphic (resp. antiholomorphic) dimension of the CFT. In fact, in it was assumed that \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}=\bar{c}_{\mathrm{eff}}\) as this holds for most CFTs, but the above is a simple generalization. More generally, relation [\[Z\]](#Z){reference-type="eqref" reference="Z"} is expected to hold simply based on scale invariance, and defines the quantity \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}+\bar{c}_{\mathrm{eff}}\), which in non-compact models might or might not be determined by [\[ceffcft\]](#ceffcft){reference-type="eqref" reference="ceffcft"}. For a non-unitary CFT we can write \[Z=\sum_n \langle L_n | e^{-\beta H}| R_n\rangle.\] Differentiating with respect to \(\beta\) twice we find \[\frac{\partial^2 Z}{\partial \beta^2}=\langle H^2 \rangle_\beta^\mathrm{c}\] where \(\langle AB\rangle_\beta^\mathrm{c} = \langle AB\rangle_\beta-\langle A\rangle_\beta\langle B\rangle_\beta\) and \[\langle \mathcal{O} \rangle_\beta= Z^{-1}{\sum_n\langle L_n|\mathcal{O}e^{-\beta H}|R_n\rangle}.\] At criticality, we have \(h = \tau + \b \tau\) and \(p=\tau-\b\tau\), and thanks to chiral factorization [\[chiral\]](#chiral){reference-type="eqref" reference="chiral"}, \[\begin{aligned}
&& \langle (\tau(z)+ \bar{\tau}(\bar{z}))(\tau(z')+\bar{\tau}(\bar{z}')) \rangle_\beta-\langle \tau(z)+ \bar{\tau}(\bar{z})\rangle_\beta\, \langle \tau(z')+\bar{\tau}(\bar{z}')\rangle_\beta\nonumber\\ &&= \langle \tau(z) \tau(z')\rangle_\beta-\langle \tau\rangle^2_\beta + \langle \bar{\tau}(\bar{z}) \bar{\tau}(\bar{z}')\rangle_\beta-\langle \b\tau\rangle_\beta^2. \end{aligned}\] Therefore, defining \(H_\pm = (H\pm P)/2\), \[\langle H^2\rangle_\beta^\mathrm{c} = \langle H_+^2\rangle_\beta^\mathrm{c} + \langle H_-^2\rangle_\beta^\mathrm{c}.\] Using the fact that \({H}^{\#}=H\) and \(P^\#=P\) we may also write \[\frac{\partial^2 Z}{\partial \beta^2}= \langle H_+^{\mathsf R} H_+^{\mathsf R} \rangle_\beta^\mathrm{c}+ \langle H_-^{\mathsf R} H_-^{\mathsf R} \rangle_\beta^\mathrm{c}\] and so \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \beta^2} \left(\lim_{\ell \rightarrow \infty} \ell^{-1}\log Z\right)&=&\int dx \, \left(\langle {\tau}^{\mathsf R}(x,t+i\epsilon) \tau^{\mathsf R} (0,t)\rangle_\beta^\mathrm{c}+\langle \b\tau^{\mathsf R} (x,t+i\epsilon) \b\tau^{\mathsf R} (0,t)\rangle_\beta^\mathrm{c}\right)\nonumber\\ &=&\frac{\pi(c_{\mathrm{eff}}+\bar{c}_{\mathrm{eff}})}{6\beta^3} \end{aligned}\] where we shift the time variable slightly to ensure that operators are time-ordered. In unitary CFT we may compute the correlators involved by identifying the CFT at finite temperature with a CFT on a cylinder of radius \(\beta^{-1}\), and then employing the transformation properties of the energy-momentum tensor under a conformal map from the plane to the cylinder. However, once more, we have not identified correlation functions of our fields \(\tau, \tau^\#, \bar{\tau}, \bar{\tau}^\#\) with those of the Virasoro-generated holomorphic and anti-holomorphic energy-momentum tensor of the standard formulation of CFT, hence we have not shown their transformation properites under conformal maps. We may instead use a more general QFT result, namely the Kubo-Martin-Schwinger relation \[\label{kms} \langle {\tau}^{{\mathsf R}}(z) \tau^{\mathsf R} ({z}')\rangle_\beta=\langle {\tau}^{\mathsf R} (z') \tau^{{\mathsf R}}(z-i\beta)\rangle_\beta.\] In order to go further, we need to argue that \[\label{comm} \langle {\tau}^{\mathsf R} (z') \tau^{{\mathsf R}}(z)\rangle_\beta =\langle \tau^{{\mathsf R}}(z){\tau}^{\mathsf R} (z')\rangle_\beta.\] Consider the function \(F(z,\beta) = \langle \tau^{\mathsf R}(z)\tau^{\mathsf R}(0)\rangle_\beta\). It is analytic in a neighborhood of the line \({\rm Im}(z)=0\), except possibly at \({\rm Im}(z)=0\). On the one hand, for \(z\approx 0\), by scaling one can use the ground-state result [\[gsres\]](#gsres){reference-type="eqref" reference="gsres"}, and thus there must be an isolated pole of order 4 at the origin. On the other hand, one can argue that the position of any other singularity, which might appear for instance due to the non-locality of \(\tau^\#\), cannot depend on the temperature, as it is a property of the operators, not of the state. Therefore, by scaling again, no other singularity should exist on the real line. By imaginary-time ordering, for \(z\in{\mathbb{R}}\setminus\{0\}\) we have \(F(z+i0) = \langle \tau^{\mathsf R}(z)\tau^{\mathsf R}(0)\rangle_\beta\) and \(F(z-i0) = \langle \tau^{\mathsf R}(0)\tau^{\mathsf R}(z)\rangle_\beta\). Since \(F(z)\) is analytic, hence continuous, on \({\mathbb{R}}\setminus\{0\}\), this implies [\[comm\]](#comm){reference-type="eqref" reference="comm"} on \(z-z'\in{\mathbb{R}}\setminus\{0\}\), and therefore for all \(z,z'\) by analytic continuation. Note that relation [\[comm\]](#comm){reference-type="eqref" reference="comm"} points to the equivalence, at least from the viewpoint of the stress-energy tensor and at criticality, of locality and hash-locality. Combining [\[kms\]](#kms){reference-type="eqref" reference="kms"} and [\[comm\]](#comm){reference-type="eqref" reference="comm"} we obtain the statement of periodicity for the analytic function \(F(z,\beta) = \langle \tau^{\mathsf R}(z)\tau^{\mathsf R}(0)\rangle_\beta\): \[\label{per} F(z,\beta) = F(z+i\beta,\beta).\] The function is in fact expected to be analytic within the full strip \({\rm Im}(z)\in(-\beta/2,\beta/2]\) except for the pole at \(z=0\). By general results in one-dimensional models at nonzero temperature, the two point function vanishes exponentially at large distances. The unique family of solutions to the periodicity [\[per\]](#per){reference-type="eqref" reference="per"}, the requirement of a singularity [\[gsres\]](#gsres){reference-type="eqref" reference="gsres"} at \(z=0\), and exponential vanishing at larges distances is \[\langle {\tau}^{{\mathsf R}}(z) \tau^{{\mathsf R}}({z}')\rangle_\beta=\frac{\pi^4 A}{\beta^4 \sinh^4\frac{\pi (z-z')}{\beta}},\] where \(A\) is a constant to be determined. Similarly: \[\langle \bar{\tau}^{{\mathsf R}}(\bar{z}) \bar{\tau}^{{\mathsf R}}(\bar{z}')\rangle_\beta=\frac{\pi^4 \bar{A}}{\beta^4 \sinh^4\frac{\pi (\bar{z}-\bar{z'})}{\beta}}.\] Performing the integral \[\frac{\pi^4}{\beta^4}\int dx \, \left(\frac{A}{\sinh^4\frac{\pi (x+i \epsilon)}{\beta}}+\frac{\bar{A}}{\sinh^4\frac{\pi (x-i\epsilon)}{\beta}}\right)=\frac{4\pi^3}{3\beta^3}(A+\bar{A}),\] and requiring that \[\frac{4\pi^3}{3\beta^3}(A+\bar{A})=\frac{\pi(c_{\mathrm{eff}}+\bar{c}_{\mathrm{eff}})}{6\beta^3},\] we find \[A+\b A=\frac{c_{\mathrm{eff}}+\bar{c}_{\mathrm{eff}}}{8\pi^2}.\] As argued earlier, we know that the function \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}(s)\) defined in ([\[defcef\]](#defcef){reference-type="ref" reference="defcef"}) has the value \(4\pi^2(f(r_{*})+\bar{f}(r_{*}))\) at conformal critical points characterized by a length scale \(r_*\). The correlators above show that this values is nothing but \(\frac{c_{\mathrm{eff}}+\bar{c}_{\mathrm{eff}}}{2}\). This completes our proof. The factor \(8\pi^2\) arises once more from the fact that our normalization of the operators ([\[operators\]](#operators){reference-type="ref" reference="operators"}) is not the standard "conformal normalization\" that is used when defining the energy-momentum tensor. In the latter context one normally works with operators \(\varepsilon:=-2\pi \tau\) and \(\bar{\varepsilon}:=-2\pi \bar{\tau}\) and similarly for the hashed operators. Employing such operators we have then that as \(\beta\rightarrow \infty\) we recover the results for CFT on the plane. In such a case the conformal correlators become: \[\langle L_0| {\varepsilon}^{{\mathsf R}}(z) \varepsilon^{\mathsf R}(0)|R_0 \rangle=\frac{c_{\mathrm{eff}}}{2 z^4} \qquad \mathrm{and} \qquad \langle L_0| \bar{\varepsilon}^{{\mathsf R}}(\bar{z}) \bar{\varepsilon}^{\mathsf R}(0)|R_0 \rangle=\frac{\bar{c}_{\mathrm{eff}}}{2 \bar{z}^4}.\]
# Testing the \(c_{\rm{eff}}\)-theorem: some examples {#sectest}
In order to illustrate the \(c_\mathrm{eff}\)-theorem, we now discuss a few interesting examples of RG flows where the conditions of the theorem are met, and some where they are not. Firstly, we would like to discuss a QFT studied in whose lagrangian density is \[\mathcal{L}_{FZ}=\psi\bar\partial{\psi}+\bar{\psi}\partial \bar{\psi}+ im \bar{\psi}\psi + ih \sigma, \label{fon}\] where \(\psi\), \(\bar{\psi}\) are the chiral components of the Majorana free Fermion field, \(\sigma\) is the corresponding spin field and \(m,h\in \mathbb{R}\) with \(m>0\). It was shown in that the theory ([\[fon\]](#fon){reference-type="ref" reference="fon"}) displays an RG flow from the critical Ising to the critical Lee-Yang model, provided the ratio \(\eta=m/|h|^{\frac{8}{15}}\) is fixed to a particular value. This describes the near-critical, universal region of a spin chain which was found earlier to be in the Ising criticality class at one point, and in the Lee-Yang class along a curve emanating from that point defined by an algebraic relation between the two coupling constants involved (corresponding to \(m\) and \(h\) in [\[fon\]](#fon){reference-type="eqref" reference="fon"}). Both in the QFT [\[fon\]](#fon){reference-type="eqref" reference="fon"} and in the quantum chain, this critical curve separates a \(\mathcal{PT}\)-broken phase, where some energy eigenvalues occur in complex conjugated pairs, from an unbroken phase, where all eigenvalues are real. Therefore, at the critical curve and more generally in the \(\mathcal{PT}\)-unbroken phase, the theory ([\[fon\]](#fon){reference-type="ref" reference="fon"}) is the type of non-unitary model where we expect the \(c_{\rm{eff}}\)-theorem to hold. The explicit \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry of the lagrangian in this case is: \[\sigma \mapsto-\sigma,\quad \psi\mapsto i\psi,\quad \b\psi \mapsto i\b\psi, \quad x\rightarrow-x,\quad i \rightarrow-i,\] which guarantees \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry of the stress-energy tensor as per [\[PTass\]](#PTass){reference-type="eqref" reference="PTass"}. The flow [\[fon\]](#fon){reference-type="eqref" reference="fon"} on the critical curve satisfies the condition [\[order\]](#order){reference-type="eqref" reference="order"}, because \((c_\mathrm{eff})_{\rm UV}=0.5\) and \((c_\mathrm{eff})_{\rm IR}=0.4\), thus confirming \(c_\mathrm{eff}\)-theorem. Further support for the existence of irreversible flows between non-unitary minimal models is the fact that, in some cases at least, it is possible to argue that they exhibit \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry themselves. This may be shown by employing an effective Landau-Ginzburg description. For the Lee-Yang minimal model, the corresponding lagrangian density is \[\label{lyl} \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{LY}}=\frac{1}{2} (\partial_\mu \phi)^2+ im \phi^3\] A natural realization of \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry in this case is the transformation \[\phi \mapsto-\phi, \quad i\mapsto-i \quad \mathrm{and} \quad x\mapsto-x, \label{ptre}\] under which the lagrangian is obviously invariant (this is a feature that is also well known from the study of the quantum-mechanical counterpart of this model ). More generally, it is known that unitary minimal models can be described by Landau-Ginzburg lagrangians with potentials which are even polynomials \(V(\phi)=V(-\phi)\) with real coefficients, where \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry in the sense of ([\[ptre\]](#ptre){reference-type="ref" reference="ptre"}) is also present. Unfortunately there is no known generic Landau-Ginzburg description of the non-unitary minimal models, as discussed in detail in , even if the Lee-Yang case is well understood. However, the presence of \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry in all theories where the potential \(V(\phi)\) either involves even powers of \(\phi\) with real coefficients and/or odd powers of \(\phi\) with imaginary coefficients, has been noted to hold quite generally, even in higher dimensions. Note that \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry has been argued to be sufficient to ensure the stability of [\[lyl\]](#lyl){reference-type="eqref" reference="lyl"}, guaranteeing the spectrum to be real and bounded from below. Secondly, there are known RG flows where the condition ([\[order\]](#order){reference-type="ref" reference="order"}) is violated. Some of these examples have been discussed in. These examples would deserve more attention as they can only be reconciled with our result if some of the properties required for a \(c_{\mathrm{eff}}\)-theorem are not met. In such theories a decreasing monotonic function flowing between the UV and IR fixed points cannot exist. This could be explained in two possible ways: either \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry is absent or broken, or the values of \(c_{\rm{eff}}(s)\) at critical points do not coincide with the effective central charge as defined in ([\[ceffcft\]](#ceffcft){reference-type="ref" reference="ceffcft"}). The latter point is relevant because some of these theories have non-compact target space. This is associated with non-compact CFTs for which the result ([\[Z\]](#Z){reference-type="ref" reference="Z"}) is not always guaranteed to hold. However, in some cases it is hard to determine which of these two conditions is broken, in particular it is not easy to determine if \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry is present or not. An example where the situation is simpler is the sine-Gordon model with purely imaginary coupling. This describes a non-unitary RG flow between two critical points, both with \(c=1\). The theory has lagrangian density of the form: \[\label{ish} \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{SG}}=\frac{1}{2} (\partial_\mu \phi)^2+ i\mu \cos\beta \phi,\] where \(\beta, \mu \in \mathbb{R}\) are coupling constants and \(\phi\) is a scalar field. Using \(p=\beta^2/(8\pi-\beta^2)\), it is natural to restrict to \(p\geq 2\). If we employ the \(\mathcal{PT}\) transformation ([\[ptre\]](#ptre){reference-type="ref" reference="ptre"}) it is clear that the cosine term in the lagrangian is not invariant. However, there are other possible realizations of \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry, such as \[\label{ptsG} \phi \mapsto \frc{\pi}\beta-\phi, \quad i\mapsto-i \quad \mathrm{and} \quad x\mapsto-x,\] which preserves the lagrangian. Thus, the theory possesses dynamical \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry as per [\[PTass\]](#PTass){reference-type="eqref" reference="PTass"}, yet the strict inequalty [\[order\]](#order){reference-type="eqref" reference="order"} is violated and thus the \(c_\mathrm{eff}\)-theorem does not hold. We speculate that \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry is in fact broken in this case: some of the energy eigenvalues are complex. This speculation is based on the following two observations. First, in, it was observed that, when a TBA analysis of the massless scattering matrix proposed to describe this model is performed, the wrong UV value of the central charge is obtained. For \(p> 3\) this was assumed to be due to technical difficulties, but seen to be more fundamental for \(2\leq p \leq 3\). At least in this region, the real-energy massless states associated to this \(S\)-matrix might not form the complete set of states necessary for a TBA analysis. Indeed, in, it was conjectured that a certain pole of the scattering matrix, for \(2\leq p < 3\), should be associated to a "monstron\" particle whose mass \(M_m=e^{i\pi(3-p)/4}M\) (where \(M\) is the "intercept scale\" of the massless spectrum) has positive imaginary part. This leads to exponentially growing amplitudes. The monstron particle provides energy eigenvalues with nonzero imaginary parts, thus breaking of \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry and making the \(c_\mathrm{eff}\)-theorem inapplicable. Beyond this range of \(p\), for instance for \(3<p<7\), a simple analytic continuation suggests that the monstron's mass gets a negative imaginary part. This would give rise to decaying amplitudes which supposedly have a vanishing influence on the TBA analysis. However, one may speculate that it still breaks \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry, and thus again makes the \(c_\mathrm{eff}\)-theorem inapplicable. In fact, by \(\mathcal{PT}\)-invariance of the hamiltonian, an "anti-monstron\" should also be present with complex conjugated mass. The transformation [\[ptsG\]](#ptsG){reference-type="eqref" reference="ptsG"} maps minima of the potential to maxima and *vice versa*. Thus, in a scattering theory whose particle spectrum is built with respect to a given supremum, only the monstron is visible; yet for \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry to be applicable, one also needs to consider the other suprema, and thus the anti-monstron. Second, quantum-group restrictions of the theory [\[ish\]](#ish){reference-type="eqref" reference="ish"} are known to correctly reproduce massless flows between unitary minimal models, lending support to the massless scattering matrix proposed. Something similar happens in the context of quantum-group invariant open XXZ chains, where boundary terms break hermiticity. These chains in general can be expected to possess states with complex eigenvalues, representing gain and loss processes. In this context, it is known that at "roots of unity\", diagonalizability does not hold and Jordan blocks appear (so that biorthogonality is broken), which quantum-group restrictions heal giving rise to minimal models. A possible scenario is that such Jordan blocks arise as conjugate pairs collapse into a single real eigenvalue (such collapses are called "exceptional points\"), indeed suggesting the presence, at generic parameters, of eigenvalues with nonzero imaginary parts. Finally, we note that there are known scaling functions, distinct from \(c_\mathrm{eff}(s)\), which flow between two conformal critical points satisfying the property ([\[order\]](#order){reference-type="ref" reference="order"}) but which do so in a non-monotonic fashion. All the examples we are aware of arise in the context of the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz approach, where a natural scaling function \(c^{\mathrm{TBA}}_\mathrm{eff}(s)\) can be defined which in unitary theories is known to encapsulate the same information as Zamolodchikov's \(c\)-function. Examples of such scaling functions have been presented in Fig. 1 and briefly discussed in the introduction. Examples of non-monotonic scaling functions have been presented in. Since these scaling functions are different from our \(c_{\rm{eff}}\)-function and they satisfy ([\[order\]](#order){reference-type="ref" reference="order"}) it is clear that they do not provide counterexamples to our theorem. Obviously there are infinitely many continuous functions flowing between two points that may be constructed, both monotonic and non-monotonic. Our claim is that the function defined by ([\[defcef\]](#defcef){reference-type="ref" reference="defcef"}) exists and is monotonic under certain conditions. The existence of other non-monotonic functions does not challenge this claim.
# Conclusions and Outlook {#secconclu}
In this letter we have shown that a function with all the properties of a \(c\)-function may be constructed for non-unitary 1+1-dimensional QFTs under certain conditions, including crucially *unbroken \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry* as expressed in [\[PTP\]](#PTP){reference-type="eqref" reference="PTP"}, [\[PTass\]](#PTass){reference-type="eqref" reference="PTass"}, and the ensuing positivity of the spectrum. Thus, the requirement of unitarity, in the sense of a hermitian hamiltonian, is not necessary for the irreversibility of RG flows to hold. Besides unbroken \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry, the properties we require (e.g. locality, Poincaré invariance etc.) are in fact very natural and routinely assumed to hold in QFT. Much of this paper is an effort to extricate some fundamental QFT concepts from unitarity and to show which properties are strictly necessary for the existence of a monotonic RG function and which are not. The resulting scaling function is monotonically decreasing along RG flows and it is constant at critical points where, at least in rational models of CFT, it takes the value \(\frac{c_{\mathrm{eff}}+\bar{c}_{\mathrm{eff}}}{2}\). In parity symmetric critical points this is the usual effective central charge introduced in. There exist massive perturbations of non-unitary minimal models of CFT. In these cases, the \(c_\mathrm{eff}\)-theorem provides an alternative understanding of the positivity of \(c_\mathrm{eff}\). It also guarantees that there cannot exist limit cycles with varying \(c_\mathrm{eff}\) in non-unitary RG flows with unbroken \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry. The proof relies on somewhat abstract considerations of the non-hermitian stress-energy tensor components \(\tau, \bar{\tau}\) and \(\theta\) acting on a *bona fide* Hilbert space. For practical purposes, a very important open question is how to explicitly construct these operators and their \({\,}^\#\) versions within the standard formulation of non-unitary CFTs (e.g. the non-unitary minimal series). In this standard formulation, the hamiltonian is hermitian, and one instead constructs the stress-energy tensor components in terms of generators of the Virasoro algebra of (possibly) negative central charge. These act on Verma modules, with an orthogonal basis (generated by the action of Virasoro operators on states created by primary fields) but with negative-norm states. Can we relate \(\tau, \bar{\tau}\) and \(\theta\) to such operators? Can we relate the states \(|R_0\rangle\) and \(\langle L_0|\) to the lowest-energy state \(|\Delta\rangle, \langle \bar{\Delta}|\) of standard CFT formulations? These are questions we would like to address in the future. We briefly discussed various examples where the assumptions and statement of the \(c_\mathrm{eff}\)-theorem can be checked, and an example where the statement does not hold, explaining how in this case \(\mathcal{PT}\)-symmetry appears to be broken. It would be important to provide more details on these examples, as well as other fully-worked cases, including a better understanding of the precise conditions of the \(c_{\rm{eff}}\)-theorem that are violated in those discussed in. Another interesting question is how the entropic arguments used in to prove Zamolodchikov's \(c\)-theorem can be generalized to give an alternative proof of the \(c_{\rm{eff}}\)-theorem. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:08:59', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01871', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01871'} |
null | null |
# Introduction
The radiation fields, winds and SNe of massive stars destroy and disperse molecular material. This eventually ends star formation in clusters, though before that happens, massive stars may trigger further star formation. The removal of mass from a cluster affects the cluster dynamics and plays a key role in cluster dissolution. Stellar feedback also sustains turbulence in the ISM and powers galactic fountains and winds. The mass, momentum, energy and ionizing radiation fluxes escaping a cluster into a galaxy, and beyond, depend on how stellar and supernova energy output regulates cluster gas. However, the coupling of stellar winds, SNe and ionizing radiation to clumpy, inhomogeneous molecular clouds surrounding a massive stellar cluster is not well constrained. Detections of diffuse X-ray emission from many young (pre-SN) massive star forming regions support the conjecture that winds play important roles in clusters. Cold molecular material sometimes confines X-ray emitting gas, but around other clusters, hot gas appears to shape and remove cold clouds. Direct evidence for large scale outflows from stellar clusters is provided by observations of stellar bowshocks in and near clusters. "Leakage" of the hot gas is also implied by the much lower mass of hot cluster gas than expected for the cluster ages and the mass-loss rates of stars, and by energy budget considerations. This leakage reduces the thermal pressure within the hot bubble enough that Hii gas pressure may drive the dynamics, at least for molecular clouds of \(\sim 10^{5}\) M\(_\odot\). Simulations of momentum-driven or isothermal winds give a lower limit to their impact. Pre-SN feedback enhances the impact of SNe, and, in whole galaxy models, clears dense gas from star forming regions, reducing the star formation rate. However, whole galaxy models remain very sensitive to assumptions in the feedback scheme. In our previous work we have examined the effect that winds and SNe have on surrounding molecular material. In, we explored the effect of mechanical feedback from a single 15 M\(_\odot\) star and a single 40 M\(_\odot\) star into a sheet-like molecular cloud formed by the action of the thermal instability under the influence of magnetic fields, that in projection appears remarkably filamentary. That cloud was one of three cases studied in @wareing16 [hereafter Paper I] which explored the formation of dense, cold, molecular clouds from quiescent diffuse thermally unstable clouds, under the influence of the thermal instability. There we considered the hydrodynamic case, the case of equal magnetic and thermal pressures and the case of dominating magnetic pressure (10\(\times\) greater than thermal pressure). Paper II explored feedback in the case of equal pressures. Here, we now explore the hydrodynamic case of feedback into a roughly spherical clumpy molecular cloud. We have presented a review of the relevant literature in Paper II and refer the interested reader back to that work. In the next section, we present our numerical method and define the initial conditions used in our model, as well as the basis for realistic input of mechanical energy from each star. In Section [3](#results){reference-type="ref" reference="results"} we present and discuss the resulting simulations, organised by results for the wind phase, the early SN phase and the late SN phase, rather than by each star. In Section [4](#analysis){reference-type="ref" reference="analysis"} we present the global evolution with time of energy, density, phase, mass-weighted temperature-density and pressure-density distribution, total mass and mixing behaviour in each of our simulations. In Section [5](#discussion){reference-type="ref" reference="discussion"} we compare our results to previous works and relevant observations. We summarise and conclude the work in Section [6](#conclusions){reference-type="ref" reference="conclusions"}.
# Numerical Methods and initial conditions {#numerical}
## Numerical methods
We present 3D, hydrodynamical (HD) simulations of stellar feedback with self-gravity using the established astrophysical code MG as recently used in Papers I and II. The code employs an upwind, conservative shock-capturing scheme and is able to employ multiple processors through parallelisation with the message passing interface (MPI) library. MG uses piece-wise linear cell interpolation to solve the Eulerian equations of hydrodynamics. The Riemann problem is solved at cell interfaces to obtain the conserved fluxes for the time update. Integration in time proceeds according to a second-order accurate Godunov method. A Kurganov Tadmor Riemann solver is again used in this work. Self-gravity is computed using a full-approximation multigrid to solve the Poisson equation. We reduce the Magneto-HD code to HD by setting all the magnetic field components to zero. For full details of the AMR method, please see Papers I and II. The simulations presented below employed 8 levels of AMR. The physical size of the computational volume and the physical resolutions are as detailed below. Continued care has been taken with the implementation of realistic heating and cooling in the same way as used in Papers I and II.
## Initial conditions
As well as creating filamentary molecular clouds through the effect of background magnetic fields and the influence of the thermal instability, Paper I also explored the formation of clumpy molecular clouds in the zero-field case. In that work, we examined the evolution of diffuse clouds varying \(\beta\), the ratio of thermal pressure to magnetic pressure. We examined three cases, \(\beta\) = 0.1, \(\beta\) = 1.0 and \(\beta\) = \(\infty\), equivalent to the hydrodynamic case of zero magnetic field and of further interest here. In Paper I, the initial condition consisted of a stationary cloud of radius 50 pc with a number density of hydrogen throughout the cloud of n\(_H\) = 1.1 cm\(^{-3}\) giving the cloud a total mass of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}16,500 M\(_\odot\). In the cloud, 10% density variations about the uniform initial density were introduced. The pressure was set according to the local density and thermal equilibrium between heating and cooling prescriptions at P\(_{eq}\)/k = \(4700\pm300\) K cm\(^{-3}\), resulting in an initial temperature T\(_{eq}\) = \(4300\pm700\) K (an unstable part of the equilibrium curve-for more details see Paper I). An advecting scalar, \(\alpha_{cloud}\), was set equal to 1 in the cloud material. The pressure of the lower density (n\(_H\) = 0.1 cm\(^{-3}\)) surroundings was set equal to that of the unperturbed cloud, with \(\alpha_{cloud}\) set equal to zero. No magnetic field was present in the simulation. The computational volume consists of a 150 pc\(^3\) box with free-flow boundary conditions (non-periodic for self-gravity) and AMR level G0 containing 4\(^3\) cells. Eight levels of AMR mean an effective resolution of 512\(^3\) cells on level G7, although by the time of the initial condition G2 with 16\(^3\) cells is the finest fully populated level (rather than the MG default of G1). Extra tests have shown we have resolved the action of the thermal instability. As previously noted in Papers I and II, such a large number of AMR levels is employed in order to efficiently compute the self-gravity on the coarsest levels and also fully resolve the structures formed in the molecular cloud. The finest physical resolution is 0.293 pc. The total number of cells across all eight AMR levels is \(13.9\times10^6\) grid cells, ten times less than that required by a fixed grid code with the equivalent 512\(^3\) cells. The large number of AMR levels is computationally costly. Each 3D HD simulation with stellar feedback and self-gravity presented here with 8 AMR levels took approximately 60,000 CPUhours (\(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10-12 48-hour cycles on 128 cores of the high performance computing facility at Leeds), so 240,000 CPUhours for the four runs presented. Supporting investigations included a parameter exploration of the initial condition (see Paper I) and a high resolution re-run of the purely hydrodynamic case which also explored clump-collapse to form pre-stellar cores. This cost more than the total CPUhours used by the simulations presented herein. Confidence in these simulations also comes from the results presented in Paper II. Each further level of AMR introduces a computational-cost-multiplier of between 6 and 8 for this model, given the spherical nature of the cloud, thus making complete higher resolution simulations prohibitively expensive at this time. Tests in Paper II showed the resolution used is appropriate for these simulations, though it is close to the cooling length at times. The influence of the thermal instability causes the cloud to evolve into multiple clumps. Specifically, molecular clumps form throughout the diffuse cloud. Self-gravity accelerates the contraction of the cloud. Besides exploring the importance of the thermal instability in molecular cloud evolution, the secondary aim of Paper I was to provide a more realistic initial condition for this work, by including more accurate heating and cooling, the effect of thermal instability, self-gravity and magnetic fields, as compared to our previous feedback studies where the clump structure was based upon the simulations of of turbulent and clumpy molecular clouds and contained 3240 M\(_{\odot}\) of material in a 4 pc radius. In this work, we take as our initial condition a repeat of a cloud simulation without magnetic field following the method of Paper I. Different random seeds result in a simulation that is qualitatively the same as the result in Paper I, but quantitatively different. After 27.1 Myrs of evolution, densities in the condensations formed in this new simulation have reached 100 cm\(^{-3}\)-the density threshold often used for injection of stars in similar simulation work. In this work, we have decided to inject stars at this time following the work of such other authors and also because of our own high-resolution simulations. We show snapshots of this initial condition in Figure [\[figure-initial\]](#figure-initial){reference-type="ref" reference="figure-initial"} and refer the interested reader to Paper I for a full description of the evolutionary process that led to the formation of this cloud. It is important to note though that this time-scale of 27.1 Myrs should not be considered as the 'age' of the parent molecular cloud-this is the length of time required to go from a diffuse cloud with an average density of n\(_H\) = 1.1 cm\(^{-3}\) to a structured molecular cloud where feedback can be introduced. Cold (less than 100 K) condensations in the cloud have only existed for a few Myrs, in reasonable agreement with observed ages of molecular clouds. In this paper, we consider four scenarios, each employing this initial condition, in order to examine the effect of stellar feedback in this cloud. We use the same method as Paper II, but repeat ourselves here for clarity in this work.
### Scenario 1-a 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star
In this scenario we introduce a 15 M\(_\odot\) star at the position (\(x\),\(y\),\(z\)) = (-0.025,-0.2351,-0.11) where the coordinates are given in scaled code units and the grid extends to \(3\times3\times3\) centred on (0, 0, 0). This is the location of the highest density condensation in the cloud, closest to the centre of the volume. We remove enough mass present in a spherical volume with a 5-cell radius centred at this point to form a 15 M\(_\odot\) star, assuming 100% conversion of cloud material to star. For this first investigation, the cloud mass in this spherical region is removed at the switch on of the stellar wind, t\(_{wind}\)=0, under the assumption that this material has formed the star. If the mass is left in the injection region, the stellar wind rapidly and unrealistically cools and hence the feedback effects are significantly underestimated. An advected scalar, \(\alpha_{wind}\), previously set to zero throughout the grid, is set to 1 in the wind injection region in order to track the movement and mixing of the wind material. For the stellar evolution, a 15 M\(_{\odot}\) non-rotating Geneva stellar evolution model calculated by is used in order to provide a realistic mass-loss rate over the lifetime of the star, as per the method used in Paper II. Detailed plots of this evolution can be found in Paper II. In this case, after 12 Myrs of stellar evolution, the cloud has also collapsed under the influence of gravity. Densities in the centre of the cloud have reached levels where the resolution is insufficient so the simulation was stopped at this point, close to the end of the star's lifetime of 12.5 Myrs. During the wind phase, the total mass and total energy injected by the star are 1.75 M\(_\odot\) and \(1.05\times10^{49}\) erg respectively. The location of the star remains constant throughout this simulation. The centre of cloud-collapse is not exactly at the location of the star though, so in this case of a 15 M\(_\odot\) star, a moving source is strictly required to accurately model this case. In future work, we plan to convert the mass into a 'star' particle following the method in MG of and. The star can then move through the computational volume whilst feeding back through winds and SNe and remain consistent with self-gravity in the simulation.
### Scenario 2-a 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star
In this scenario we introduce a 40 M\(_\odot\) star using the same method and at the same position as in Scenario 1, removing enough mass to form a 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star from the spherical injection region. A 40 M\(_{\odot}\) non-rotating stellar evolution model calculated by is used in order to provide a realistic mass-loss rate over the lifetime of the star. Detailed plots of this evolution can be found in Paper II. The total mass and total energy injected by the star prior to supernova explosion are 27.2 M\(_\odot\) and \(2.50\times10^{50}\) erg respectively. After 4.97 Myrs, the star explodes as a SN, injecting 10 M\(_\odot\) of stellar material and 10\(^{51}\) ergs of energy into the same wind injection volume. The SN mass and energy is injected over 500 yrs, roughly consistent with the time taken for a remnant to reach the size of the injection volume. An advected scalar, \(\alpha_{SN}\), previously set to zero throughout the grid, is set to 1 in the supernova injection region in order to track the movement and mixing of the SN material. At this time the wind scalar \(\alpha_{wind}\) is set to zero. The fraction of cloud material in any given cell is \(\alpha_{cloud}-\alpha_{wind}-\alpha_{SN}\). Gravity plays less of a role during this shorter stellar wind phase as compared to the 15 M\(_\odot\) star case and the early SN phase, partly due to the comparatively powerful dynamics and partly due to the shorter timescale, but we continue to include it for consistency within the cloud and to explore the evolution post-SN when it again plays more of a role.
### Scenario 3-a 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star
In this scenario we introduce a 60 M\(_\odot\) star using the same method and at the same position as in Scenario 1, removing enough mass to form a 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star from the spherical injection region. A 60 M\(_{\odot}\) non-rotating stellar evolution model calculated by is used in order to provide a realistic mass-loss rate over the lifetime of the star. The calculated mass-loss rate and wind velocity are shown in Fig. [\[60evolution\]](#60evolution){reference-type="ref" reference="60evolution"}. Also shown in Fig. [\[60evolution\]](#60evolution){reference-type="ref" reference="60evolution"} are the energy injection rate and total injected mass. The total mass and total energy injected by the star prior to supernova explosion are 47.5 M\(_\odot\) and \(8.9\times10^{50}\) erg respectively, almost equivalent to the energy introduced in the SN event and considerably more material. After 3.97 Myrs, the star explodes as a SN in the same manner as in Scenario 2.
### Scenario 4-a 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star
In this scenario we introduce a 120 M\(_\odot\) star using the same method and at the same position as in Scenario 1. In this case, we simply remove all the mass in a spherical region twice the size of the injection region in order to form the 120 M\(_\odot\) star. A 120 M\(_{\odot}\) non-rotating stellar evolution model calculated by is used in order to provide a realistic mass-loss rate over the lifetime of the star. The calculated mass-loss rate and wind velocity are shown in Fig. [\[120evolution\]](#120evolution){reference-type="ref" reference="120evolution"}. Also shown in Fig. [\[120evolution\]](#120evolution){reference-type="ref" reference="120evolution"} are the energy injection rate and total injected mass. The total mass and total energy injected by the star prior to supernova explosion are 89.1 M\(_\odot\) and \(2.44\times10^{51}\) erg respectively, considerably more than the amount of material and energy introduced in a SN event. After 3.01 Myrs, the star explodes as a SN in the same manner as in Scenario 2.
# Results
In this section we present our results. We present both 2D slices through the computational volume created within MG and 3D contour and volume visualisations, created using the VisIt software. Raw data for the all figures in this paper is available from the University of Leeds Repository at doi.org/10.5518/201.
## The wind phase {#windphase}
In Fig. [\[wnd-15M\]](#wnd-15M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-15M"} we show density slices through the computational volume during the evolution of the 15 M\(_\odot\) star up to the end of its life. The low mass-loss rate and corresponding low energy injection rate have minimal effect on the cloud structure, generating only a wind cavity that spreads away from the star into the cloud around the clumps for the first few Myrs, but is eventually confined by the gravitational contraction of the cloud itself. All three planes through the location of the star reveal similar structure for all timepoints. This structure is a result of the weak wind that is able to affect the inter-clump material, but is not able to affect the high-density clumps themselves. Examining the extent of the stellar wind material we see that very little wind material gets more than 10 pc away from the star. During the red super giant (RSG) phase of evolution, from t\(_{wind}\)=11.2 Myr until its SN explosion, the slow dense wind deposits considerable amounts of material into the cavity formed by the earlier wind and completely refills it. We do not show this stage of evolution here, as the cloud itself has collapsed and dominates the end stages of the stellar bubble's evolution. Neither do we trigger a supernova in this simulation, as the cloud collapses to a high density which is unrealistic given our resolution. In Fig. [\[wnd-40M\]](#wnd-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-40M"} we show the logarithm of density on all three planes through the location of the 40 M\(_\odot\) star at various times through the star's lifespan. By only 0.707 Myrs into the main sequence evolution of the star, the impact on the molecular cloud is significant and clearly different from the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, as shown in the first row of Fig. [\[wnd-40M\]](#wnd-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-40M"}. The stellar wind is expanding away from the star, streaming past the clumps and already forming clear channels through the cloud. The wind is also beginning to ablate material from the clumps into the wind flow along the channels. By 1.53 Myrs, as shown in the second row of Fig. [\[wnd-40M\]](#wnd-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-40M"}, the wind has continued to expand, establishing a distinct reverse shock at a radius of approximately 5 pc. The ablated clumps are losing further material and being pushed away from the star-the force of the stellar wind on the clumps is clearly overcoming the gravitational contraction of the cloud and the wind is now blowing the cloud apart. After 3.01 Myrs, the wind has reached the edge of the cloud material and can be seen in the \(x\)-plane expanding into the low-density surrounding medium. The wind has not yet escaped the cloud on the other planes, probably due to a combination of the centre-offset position of the star and the clump distribution in the cloud. A small number of low-density channels have now also become dominant in the structure, but by 4.42 Myrs, at the end of the Main Sequence evolution of the star, these channels have become less distinct on the x-plane, but more distinct on the \(y\)-plane. This structure, with its channels and clumps connected together is reminiscent of our previous work. The star now enters the LBV phase. The wind mass-loss rate increases by two orders of magnitude to \(\sim10^{-4}\) M\(_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\), and the terminal wind speed reduces to \(\sim100\) km s\(^{-1}\). This slow dense wind forms a high density environment around the location of the star, which eventually contains \(\sim20\) M\(_\odot\) of LBV wind material. This phase lasts approximately 200 kyrs and is followed by the WR phase of stellar evolution, where a variable, faster, less dense but more powerful wind sweeps up the LBV wind over the course of the final 400 kyrs of the star's life. The structure formed is presented in the next section. In Fig. [\[wnd-60M\]](#wnd-60M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-60M"} we show the logarithm of density on all three planes through the location of the 60 M\(_\odot\) star at various times through the star's lifespan. After only 1.5 Myrs, the impact on the molecular cloud is already almost equivalent to the total impact of the 40 M\(_\odot\) star. The wind has carved channels to allow the flow of wind material out of the cloud and is now breaking out into the surrounding medium. After 3.3 Myrs, at the end of the Main Sequence evolution, the structure is more extreme, with several deep channels carved through the cloud and considerable amounts of wind material flowing out of the cloud. The reverse shock is clear and very close to spherical, almost isolated from the parent cloud, at a radius of approximately 20 pc from the star. Many clumps towards the lower left of the star have been ablated and are mass-loading the wind flowing away from the star. However, towards the upper left of the star, many of the clumps are still distinct, intact and still comparatively close to the star, especially compared to the now close-to empty region towards the lower left of the x-plane. Clearly the distribution of clumps and the position of the star play a key role in defining the wind-blown structure around the star. After 2.74 Myrs, the star enters the LBV phase and again the mass-loss rate increases and terminal wind speed reduces. As we saw also for the 40 M\(_\odot\) scenario, this slow dense wind forms a high density environment around the location of the star. We show the nature of the environment after this LBV phase along the third row of Fig. [\[wnd-60M\]](#wnd-60M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-60M"}. After this, during the WR phase of stellar evolution, the variable, faster, less dense but more powerful wind is able to sweep the LBV and Main Sequence material out into the cloud creating the final environment into which the supernova will go off. By this time, the reverse shock is now up to 35 pc from the star and there are no traces of the high-density environment formed during the LBV phase. The large reverse shock structure dominates the cloud, outside which multiple channels will allow SN material to be transported rapidly out of the cloud. We note that some clumps have again survived this more extreme stellar evolution and remain relatively close to the star. In Fig. [\[wnd-120M\]](#wnd-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-120M"} we show the logarithm of density on all three planes through the location of the 120 M\(_\odot\) star at various times through the star's lifespan. The 120 M\(_\odot\) star evolves through the Main Sequence period in 2.24 Myrs. The first two rows of Fig. [\[wnd-120M\]](#wnd-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-120M"} show the extreme effect this star has on its environment. By the end of the Main Sequence, half the cloud has been blown away, as shown in the \(x\)-plane. The reverse shock, previously relatively small, now approaches half the radius of the original cloud. It is almost spherical-the molecular cloud material has been carried out by the force of the stellar wind. In the \(y\)-and \(z\)-planes, channels through the cloud are clear. In the \(z\)-plane, some molecular cloud material is still reasonably close to the star, just outside the reverse shock. During the following LBV phase, multiple non-spherical shells form around the star, as shown in the third row of Fig [\[wnd-120M\]](#wnd-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-120M"}, caused by the oscillatory changes in the mass-loss rate and wind speed (see Fig [\[120evolution\]](#120evolution){reference-type="ref" reference="120evolution"}). The structure of the cloud is quite different depending upon which plane is considered. Low-density empty voids exist to the left in the \(x\)-plane and clumpy structure surrounds the shells formed during the LBV phase in the \(y\)-plane. After the LBV phase, the variable, faster, less dense WR wind is able to evacuate the interior of the cloud in all directions, generating a strong reverse shock that in the empty void extends to more than 50 pc from the star. We show the final structure of the cloud at the end of the star's life, after 3.01 Myrs, across the fourth row of Fig. [\[wnd-120M\]](#wnd-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-120M"}. Much of the cloud has been swept away. Compared to the previous cases, the least amount of clumpy cloud material remains around the star-something we will study in more detail in the following Analysis section. In Fig. [\[wnd-proj\]](#wnd-proj){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-proj"} we show column density, naive emission (calculated from the radiative cooling energy source term) and 3D visualisations of the cloud-wind structure at the end of the life of the three most massive stars. In the 40 M\(_\odot\) star case, the blown-out side of the cloud is very clear in the column density plot. The radiative cooling plot highlights the 'emission' from the isolated LBV/WR shell very clearly, as discussed in more detail in the next sub-section. In the case of the 60 M\(_\odot\) star, the column density projected along the \(y\)-axis highlights the fact that whilst the wind has blown out a larger section of the cloud than in the previous case (as shown in Fig. [\[wnd-60M\]](#wnd-60M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-60M"}), the line-of-sight has strong effect on how obvious this blow-out is to the observer. The naive emission from the radiative cooling energy source term highlights the much greater extent of the more powerful WR wind in this case, reaching throughout the cloud. Column density shown collapsed along the \(z\)-direction for the 120 M\(_\odot\) star does show very clearly how much of the cloud has been dispersed from the original structure, as compared to how much is left in the top half of the cloud. Distinct in this plot and the plot for the 40 M\(_\odot\) star are the radially aligned 'spokes' of the cloud after sculpting by the stellar wind. The hot, fast WR wind has triggered 'emission' all over the structure in the case of the 120 M\(_\odot\) star. Of course the 'emission' assumes optically thin conditions and true estimates of emission require radiative transfer to be simulated alongside the hydrodynamic evolution of the cloud-wind interaction. In the third column of Fig. [\[wnd-proj\]](#wnd-proj){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-proj"} we show a complex 3D isosurface of the wind scalar on half the volume (indicated by the colour scale for the domain x\(\leq\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0) and a second isosurface of the high density clumpy cloud structure (indicated by the black isosurfaces at \(\rho\)=25 cm\(^{-3}\)). In all three star cases, the yellow core highlights the inner core of the wind-blown bubble as well as the increasing extent of the wind-carved channels with greater stellar mass, reaching off the domain in many places for the case of the 120 M\(_\odot\) star. Noticeable also from these 3D visualisations is the widening distribution of the high density structure (indicated by the black clumps), dispersed by the increasingly powerful stellar winds with increasing stellar mass.
## The early supernova phase {#snphase}
The environment into which the SN mass and energy from the 40 M\(_\odot\) star are injected is shown in Fig. [\[sn-40M\]](#sn-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-40M"}(a). The non-spherical high density shell structure formed during the WR stage of evolution is centred on the location of the star, distinct from, but strongly influenced by, the surrounding molecular cloud structure. In 4700 yrs the supernova remnant (SNR) has propagated far enough to fill the LBV/WR shell and after 7073 years the SNR has overrun the shell and is now expanding into the star's wind-blown bubble, as shown in panel (b) and (c) of Fig. [\[sn-40M\]](#sn-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-40M"}. After 10,000 yrs, shown in panel (d), the forward shock of the SNR can clearly be seen expanding out into the bubble. Meanwhile, internal shocks reflecting off the inner shell are refilling the SNR. Clump remnants that had survived the wind phase are compressed by the SNR over the next 10,000 years (panels (e) and (f)) and then accelerated outwards, towards the edge of the wind bubble. By 42,000 years, in the final panel of Fig. [\[sn-40M\]](#sn-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-40M"}, the internal shocks running back towards the location of the star from the edge of the wind bubble are acting to generate even more complex structure inside the SNR. The SNR now continues to expand, encompassing the wind bubble. The forward shock of the SNR reaches the edge of the grid after 69,000 years, at the point where the SNR is closest to the edge of the grid in this panel. In our previous work, studying the evolution of 40 M\(_\odot\) star in a sheet-like cloud, we found the stellar wind generated a tunnel through the cloud, through which the SNR was then able to escape the parent cloud in a matter of only 30,000 years. Here, the SNR is able to progress through the wind-blown bubble equally as quickly, going beyond the extent of the original parent cloud where the wind-blown bubble had swept up and then beyond the molecular cloud itself. In other directions though, the SNR has been rapidly deccelerated as it enters the parent molecular cloud-only in panel (e) of Fig. [\[sn-40M\]](#sn-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-40M"}, 13,000 years after the SN event, do we begin to clearly see the SNR progressing into clumpy cloud material. So in this case, as in the magnetically-influenced case of the 40 M\(_\odot\) star in Paper II, the wind-blown environment is the key to the evolution of the SNR. Progress in the hydrodynamic case is dramatically slowed by the denser clumps and the inter-clump material, as compared to progress through the low-density wind cavity. We now examine the same intra-cavity phase for the 60 M\(_\odot\) and 120 M\(_\odot\) stars. In Fig. [\[sn-60M\]](#sn-60M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-60M"} we show the logarithm of density on planes through the location of the 60 M\(_\odot\) star at times after the SN event corresponding approximately to those shown in Fig. [\[sn-40M\]](#sn-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-40M"}. Immediately clear in panel (a) is the larger size of the wind-blown bubble and also the lack of any LBV/WR shell. The late-stage wind has blown out through the entire cavity formed in the preceding phase. The reverse shock of the WR wind is visible above and to the right of the star's location, located at a stand-off against the remaining clumpy cloud material. In the other directions, the shock of the WR wind is not visible in this figure due to the scaling chosen to show the supernova evolution, but can be seen in the final row of Fig. [\[wnd-60M\]](#wnd-60M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-60M"}. The supernova explodes into this environment. For the first 4000 years the SNR expands into WR wind, unhindered by material from the preceding phases, or cloud material, as shown in panel (b). By 7000 years the SNR has passed the reverse shock of the WR wind in all directions and is now interacting with the remaining cloud material close to the star. Shocks are beginning to propagate down the channels between the network of clumps, whilst stand-off bow shocks are also forming ahead of the radial spokes of the network. Meanwhile, in the opposite direction, the SNR continues to expand into shocked LBV/WR wind material. This scenario of free expansion in one direction with interaction in the other now describes the next 20,000 years of SNR evolution as shown in the middle row of Fig. [\[sn-60M\]](#sn-60M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-60M"}. Compared to the case of the 40 M\(_\odot\) star, the wind structure is much larger and the channels off the grid have allowed the forward shock to leave the grid much earlier, specifically only 15,000 years after the SN event, propagating down the widest wind-blown channel shown on the left of these panels. By 50,000 years, the interactions of the SNR with this structure have setup multiple bow shocks which interact and form an even more complex structure. Channels allowing the early propagation of the SNR off the grid have now been filled with multiple wide bow-shock structures, as has the inside of the remnant. It is of particular interest here to note the survival of the spoke-like network of clumpy material to the left of the star. As the preceding wind rearranged the individual clumps into aligned spokes, the cold cloud material aligned in the spokes is self-shielded against the passage of the SNR (and the preceding WR wind). Thus, whilst the head of each spoke is ablated, the length of the structures at 10-20 pc means much of the structure survives beyond this early stage of the SNR-clearly until at least 80,000 years beyond the SN event, as shown in panel (i). We will explore the further evolution of these structures in the next sub-section and analyse the amount of cold cloud component remaining in the following Section. Some slight numerical artifacts can be seen in the interior of the SNR at times, caused by derefinements of the AMR scheme in the smooth but ballistic and expanding flow. These have no effect on the passage of strong internal shocks, reflected off the cloud-wind structure, as can be seen across the third row of the figure. In Fig. [\[sn-120M\]](#sn-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-120M"} we show the logarithm of density on planes through the location of the 120 M\(_\odot\) star at times after the SN event corresponding approximately to those shown in Figs. [\[sn-60M\]](#sn-60M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-60M"} and [\[sn-120M\]](#sn-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-120M"}. Clear again in panel (a) is the greater effect upon the cloud of the stellar wind-half the cloud has been blown away. Again there is no LBV/WR shell-the reverse shock of the WR wind is visible to the right of the star's location, located at a greater stand-off distance against the remaining clumpy cloud material than in the case of the 60 M\(_\odot\) star. In the other directions, the reverse shock of the WR wind is almost off the grid and far outside the original extent of the parent cloud (r\(_{cloud}\approx1\)). Panel (b) shows the SNR expanding into the undisturbed WR wind cavity for the first 5,000 years or so. After this time, the SNR passes the WR reverse shock boundary, creating internal structure at the edge of the SNR. It also begins to interact with the remaining 'spokes' of cold cloud material, ablating the inner end of the radially-aligned spoke structure. Over the next 10,000 years (second row of Fig [\[sn-120M\]](#sn-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-120M"}), the forward shock of the SNR continues to expand into shocked WR wind material in one direction, whilst interacting with remaining cloud material in the other. This makes it easy to see how the SNR evolves differently under almost unhindered expansion versus expansion into multiple cold molecular clumps. This also highlights, as with the previous cases, that it is possible to observe *both* scenarios in one supernova event. The forward shock leaves the grid after approximately 15,000 years, similarly to the 60 M\(_\odot\) star case. Across the third row of Fig. [\[sn-120M\]](#sn-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-120M"} it is possible to see the same SNR interaction behaviour as in the previous case of the 40 M\(_\odot\) star, in that the SNR expands along the free channels, only in this case the left side of the cloud is so dispersed that it is more like remnants of cloud material in a low-density shocked wind medium, than channels through shocked medium. For this reason the bow-shocks forming ahead of the remaining material against the SNR are not able to intersect to the extent that a reverse shock propagates back towards the explosion site. Indeed, the evolution of the bow-shocks over time shows the relatively rapid cooling of these structures, as they fall back onto the clumps they were initially detached from. A large void in the centre of the SNR now exists. Evolving rapidly into this void, launched off the remaining cloud material to the right, is an internal shock. This can clearly be seen moving across the grid with a negative \(y\)-velocity in the bottom row of Fig. [\[sn-120M\]](#sn-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="sn-120M"}. By 50,000 years, this structure has passed the original location of the SN event. This creates the observationally interesting scenario of an offset 'centre' of the SNR, compared to the original location of the star (and the current location of any remaining stellar remnant). This particular simulation demonstrates the case of the stellar remnant being close to the edge of the SNR within a comparatively short 50,000 years since the SN event.
## The late supernova phase {#latesnphase}
In Fig. [\[snlate-40M\]](#snlate-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="snlate-40M"} we show the late post-SN evolution of the 40 M\(_\odot\) star simulation on \(y\)-planes through the location of the star. We show \(y\)-planes in this figure (as opposed to the \(x\)-planes shown for the early SN stage), as the SNR leaves the computational volume later on in the \(y\)-plane (due to the position of the star and structure of the cloud) and hence boundary effects come into play later on this plane. After 98,000 years, as shown in panel (a), the SNR can be seen escaping the molecular cloud, having now swept up the wind material into the thin shell, punctured by the spokes of remaining cloud material. Over the next few hundred thousand years, internal shocks bounce back from the edge of the SNR, and the ablation of the remaining cloud material increases due to the passage of these shocks within the internal void of the SNR. The SNR has also expanded and cooled far enough to reach the radiative phase of evolution. In panel (b), the forward shock is becoming subject to Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities and beginning to break up into individual clumps, in the same way as noted previously in Paper II. The remnants of the molecular cloud survive this phase reasonably well. By 1.51 Myrs, the forward shock of the SNR has reached the edge of the computational volume and the simulation after this point should not be taken too literally, since boundary effects have come into play. Nevertheless, the later evolution can be used as a guide to the sort of behaviour one might expect to see. We are now particularly interested in the fate of the remaining cloud material. Considering the second row of panels, (d) at 2.1 Myrs, (e) at 3.28 Myrs and (f) at 4.46 Myrs post-SN, it is clear that the molecular cloud has been dispersed as all that is left are a few disparate high-density clumps. It's clear by looking at the temperature plots at equivalent times, as shown in the third row of the figure, that these are still cold (\(\leq\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100 K), even after the passage of the SNR and are the final remaining parts of the molecular cloud. The structure of the cloud is destroyed, but parts of the cold cloud material remain, much as occurred in the case of the 40 M\(_\odot\) star in a magnetically-collimated sheet-like cloud in Paper II. As also noted in Paper II, self-gravity in the dispersed clumps is now likely to dominate their evolution, possibly leading to further star formation. It is highly likely that the disruption of the molecular cloud is caused by the SN event and not influenced by any numerical effects, as the outward motion of the clumps can be traced back to before the SNR reached the edge of the computational volume. We will consider in the following cases whether this can be confirmed further, by examining the rate of cloud destruction in each case, but to be more confident of this result, future computationally-costly simulations with a larger volume are necessary. Further questions over the fate of the remaining molecular material and whether the SN triggers any further formation of cold material by disrupting the thermal stability of the wind/cloud material are addressed in Section [4](#analysis){reference-type="ref" reference="analysis"}. Some indications are given by the decreasing lower limit of the temperature range going from panels (h) to (i), indicating the presence of ever-colder material on this plane. Note also the 'turbulent' nature of the interior of the SNR, caused by the interaction of multiple shocks. Even after 2 Myrs, the temperature inside the SNR is still above 10\(^6\) K. The SNR cools noticeably over the next 2.5 Myrs. With a cooling and dispersing remnant, gravity plays an increasingly important role. We have simulated on to 6 Myrs post-SN, but are unable to confidently assess the balance in the simulation between the evolution caused by the SNR, by gravity and by the influence of any boundary effects. In Fig. [\[snlate-60M\]](#snlate-60M){reference-type="ref" reference="snlate-60M"} we show the late post-SN evolution of the 60 M\(_\odot\) star simulation. Whilst structural similarities to the 40 M\(_\odot\) case are apparent, it should be noted that the SNR is larger and has left the cloud at a much earlier time. Clearly the major reason is the enhanced disruption of the cloud by the wind during the preceding evolution. While the SNR transitions into the radiative phase at around the same time, comparing panel (b) in both this and Fig.[\[snlate-40M\]](#snlate-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="snlate-40M"}, it is clear that the rest of the remnant is much more dispersed. The same effects come into play as the star evolves into Myrs post-SN, but in this case it should be noted that the clumpy remains of the molecular cloud are fewer and further out from the star. We show the SNR at 5.64 Myrs post-SN to display the final turbulent state of the SNR. We analyse the evolution of the cold molecular material in the computational volume as a whole in the next Section. In Fig. [\[snlate-120M\]](#snlate-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="snlate-120M"} we show the late post-SN evolution of the 120 M\(_\odot\) star simulation. The effect of the preceding wind phase-to allow the SNR to have completely blown through the wind-cloud structure in the \(y\)-plane after only 100,000 years-is shown in panel (a). A slight "echo" of the edge of the cloud remains, but otherwise turbulent conditions dominate the interior of the SNR. This arc-like echo of the cloud breaks up after 300,000 years of SNR evolution. After 1.5 Myrs, the last few high-density cloud components are leaving the grid. After this, a low density SNR void is surrounded by average ISM conditions (densities ranging from 10\(^{-2}\) to 10\(^0\) particles per cm\(^3\)). There are no cloud components left on this plane-the cloud has been completely dispersed by the SNR.
# Analysis
## Energy
In Fig. [\[energy\]](#energy){reference-type="ref" reference="energy"} we show how the distribution of energy between kinetic, thermal and hot thermal (i.e. material above 10,000K) in the cloud, wind and SN material combined, varies over time following the introduction of stellar feedback, with reference to a simulation of the cloud evolution without feedback for each star. The thermal and kinetic energy fractions together sum to 1.0, i.e. we are ignoring gravitational energy in this figure. Note that the hot thermal profile indicates the fraction of the thermal energy which is "hot". In the second plot for each star, we show how the total energy in the cloud varies over time, with reference to the simulations of the cloud without feedback. The third plot for the 40, 60 and 120 M\(_\odot\) star cases shows the post-SN "radiated and escaped energy\", i.e. energy that is radiated away or leaves the grid dynamically-we do not differentiate between these two means of energy loss in the plot. For the first 10 Myrs of the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, the energy fractions do not change considerably during the wind phase, as compared to the reference case. This was expected from the minimal dynamic and structural impact the star has on the cloud. In fact the stellar wind introduces so little energy, that the overall energy in the cloud reduces over the first 10 Myr of the star's life, as compared to the 'no feedback' reference case. This likely arises due to relatively efficient radiative cooling of the predominantly thermal energy injected by the stellar wind, perhaps due to weakly compressing and heating neighbouring cloud material. From 10 Myr post star formation (37 Myrs in the figure), the collapse of the cloud dominates the evolution. The stellar wind has little effect on this and after 37 Myrs, these results contain no meaningful information. In the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, the stellar wind has a clear effect on the energy fractions during the wind phase. The stellar wind supplies and creates large amounts of kinetic and hot thermal energy, raising both fractions above the close-to-zero reference case. Given that the wind blows a hot bubble, it's likely that radiative losses are responsible for the drop in total energy approaching the end of the star's life, before the introduction of 10\(^{51}\) erg of thermal energy and 10 M\(_{\odot}\) of material in the SN event. The introduction of this thermalised SN kinetic energy is most obvious in the total energy plot, as the spike just after 32 Myrs. Since the SN energy is injected thermally, both the thermal energy and the 'hot thermal' phase rise sharply at this time. The third plot for the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star case shows that the SN energy is rapidly transported and radiated out of the simulation. Note that the forward shock of the SNR first reaches the edge of the computational volume approximately 69,000 years after the SN event. At approximately 1 Myr post-SN, the energy balances are most different from the reference case without feedback (apart from the first few thousand years of SN evolution, which we discuss in more detail later in this sub-section). After this, as the SNR escapes from the cloud/wind structure into the surroundings and then off the grid, the kinetic energy fraction falls and the thermal energy fraction rises. This behaviour continues, albeit at a decreasing rate, until the end of the simulation. The actual amount of thermal energy drops until approximately 2.5 Myrs post-SN and then plateaus, whereas the kinetic energy simply continues to drop during the simulation post-SN. The plateauing of thermal energy corresponds to when the hot thermal fraction of energy remaining on the grid has fallen to close to zero-much of the material on the grid has now dropped to temperatures below 10,000K and densities in the range 0.01-1 cm\(^{-3}\), with random motions at a range of velocities and scales (except for the last remaining gas in the hot, central void of the SNR, but this is at low density). This is fairly characteristic of the warm, neutral medium, formed in this case from evolution of an isolated single star, approximately 2.5 Myrs post-SN. In the 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, the wind effect upon the thermal and kinetic energy fraction is an amplified version of the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star case. During the Main Sequence wind phase, the amounts of both thermal and kinetic energy on the grid increase smoothly for 2.5 Myrs, then decrease smoothly, with the amount of kinetic energy increasing and decreasing more than thermal energy. In the final stages of the star's evolution, the total energy in the simulation is increased by a factor of 5 by the stellar wind, with a sharp increase in amounts of both thermal and kinetic energy. This corresponds closely with the increased energy injection rate of the stellar wind, as shown in Fig. [\[60evolution\]](#60evolution){reference-type="ref" reference="60evolution"}. The kinetic energy increases by a factor of 10, leading to the apparent drop in the thermal energy fraction, although there is no drop in the actual amount of energy. Just before the supernova, ten times more energy is present in the simulation than in the reference case, or the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star case (which is close to the reference case pre-supernova). One must bear in mind that a substantial amount of the total wind energy up to this point has already been transported off the grid, while some has also been radiated away. The SN event increases the amount of energy on the grid by a factor of 10. The post-SN evolution of the energy fraction and the total energy in the simulation evolves in a similar way to the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, with an initial peak in kinetic energy (and trough in thermal energy) as the SNR blows out of the cloud. In this case though, the forward shock leaves the grid along the wind-carved channels much more quickly, first reaching the edge of the computational volume after only 15,000 years. The initial peaks are followed by similar evolution between the thermal, hot thermal and kinetic energy fractions when compared to the 40 M\(_\odot\) star case. The thermal energy plateau of warm, neutral medium is reached on the same timescale. Whilst the detailed evolution of the cloud with feedback from a 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star is visibly very different to the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, as shown in the previous Section, the evolution of the energy fraction, total energy and radiated/escaped energy is not considerably different. The 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star case is similar to the case of the 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star. The wind introduces considerably more kinetic energy though, driving shock heating and a greater fraction of hot thermal energy. The late stages of stellar evolution are equally complex and track the variations in energy injection rate, but the post-SN evolution is remarkably similar. Most interestingly, the supernova from the 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star very rapidly loses thermal energy post-SN and the kinetic energy peaks at a higher fraction than both the 40 and 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star cases. Again, the forward shock leaves the grid in around 15,000 years, along the low density channels carved by the wind through the cloud and surroundings. Although the post-SN material in the 120 M\(_{\odot}\) case does briefly plateau in the warm, neutral phase between 2.5 to 3.5 Myrs post-SN, the thermal energy on the grid then continues to decrease. The grid is dominated by the hot, low-density void of the inner SNR, which is still cooling, leading to this effect. Any warm, netural medium would be outside the grid. This highlights the range upon which each star acts, increasing with the mass of the star (and hence strength of the wind). A larger computational volume is clearly necessary to capture the characteristics of the surrounding medium that the 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star creates post-SN. In Fig. [\[wndenergy\]](#wndenergy){reference-type="ref" reference="wndenergy"} we show the evolution of the energy fraction of stellar wind material for each star. The wind material injected by the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star is almost completely dominated by hot thermal energy, and has very little kinetic energy, until the end of the star's life (indicating that the wind is "bottled up"). The wind material from the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star has a greater fraction of kinetic energy, which increases steeply close to the supernova event as the star enters its WR phase. Post-SN, the energy of the wind material follows a similar trend to that of the total energy in the simulation, as shown in the last figure. The same trends are seen in the 60 and 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star cases. In Fig. [\[snenergy\]](#snenergy){reference-type="ref" reference="snenergy"} we show the evolution of the energy fractions of the supernova material for each star. Clearest in panel (a), showing the first few tens of thousands of years of the SNR evolution, is the initial conversion of thermal energy into the kinetic energy of expansion of the ejecta (causing the thermal energy to drop to only 10% of the total ejecta energy), followed by a rapid increase to 35% as the expanding ejecta passes through a reverse shock and is rethermalized to an 85% fraction. Over the next 4 Myr, the thermal energy fraction drops to 60% of the total (but since material is lost off the grid one cannot draw any further conclusions).
## Maximum density
In Fig. [\[maxrho\]](#maxrho){reference-type="ref" reference="maxrho"} we show the maximum densities reached in the simulations, compared to the maximum density at the same time in the reference case without stellar feedback. In the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, the maximum density during the wind phase follows the reference case. The maximum density is more than 10\(^6\) H cm\(^{-3}\) during the cloud collapse; realistic in the gravitational collapse of a molecular cloud, but beyond the accuracy of the resolution used in this simulation. In the other three cases, the stellar winds are able to create considerably higher densities than in the reference case during the wind phase, enough for the possibility of a second generation of star formation with densities over 10\(^3\) H cm\(^{-3}\). Variations are not due to the stellar wind-it is relatively steady with smooth variation over the majority of the star's lifetime-but instead must be due to the compressional effect the stellar wind has on the cloud, rearranging the structure and compressing "spokes". By the time of the supernova, the maximum density in all three cases is back to similar levels to the reference case, showing that whilst the final wind stages inject a considerable amount of mass, densities elsewhere reduce as the cause of increased density, compression by the wind, has reduced. The SN instantly raises the density in the injection location, but the spikes seen in the plots are instead associated with compression of surrounding LBV/WR material and then cloud material in the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, and the cloud material in the 60 and 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star cases. Later peaks in the maximum density plots, showing against the overall decreasing trend of maximum density, may be associated with the formation of new cold material after SN affected material returns to the thermally unstable phase. Localised star formation, according to our star formation rules, would occur in all these cases. Only in the case of the 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star is a late onset increase in maximum density apparent (post 34.5 Myrs). This must be associated with increasing amounts of cold molecular material, even in the warm, neutral medium. This is investigated further in the next sub-section.
## Phases
In Fig. [\[phases\]](#phases){reference-type="ref" reference="phases"} we show the phase fraction and total cloud mass for all four feedback simulations. At the injection of a star, 27 Myrs into the cloud's evolution, the cloud is in thermal equilibrium (i.e. on the equilibrium curve between heating and cooling processes) with 50% of its mass in the warm phase (5,000 K \(\leq\) T \(\leq\) 10,000 K), \(\approx 25\)% of its mass in the cold phase (T \(\leq\) 160 K) and \(\approx 25\)% of its mass in the unstable equilibrium part of the pressure-density distribution (160 K \(\leq\) T \(\leq\) 5,000 K). No material is in the hot thermal phase (T \(\geq\) 10,000 K). Once mechanical feedback starts the cloud material is shock heated out of thermal equilibrium and requires a cooling time to radiate away its excess energy. The low density shocked stellar wind gas has a comparatively long cooling timescale, while the denser and cooler swept-up gas has a much shorter cooling timescale. Later on, the hot SN ejecta and the gas it sweeps up have comparatively long cooling timescales. Fig. [\[phases\]](#phases){reference-type="ref" reference="phases"}(a) shows that during the wind phase of the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star case before the cloud collapses (beyond \(t=37\) Myrs), the fraction of cold material decreases during the first 0.5 Myr, with a corresponding increase in unstable material, then slowly increases very much like the reference case with no feedback-the molecular cloud continues to form around the stellar wind bubble. The introduction of stellar feedback has little effect upon the amount of warm thermally stable material, until close to the collapse of the cloud. The presence of a larger quantity of unstable material as compared to the reference case enables the condensation of slightly more cold material, allowing the fraction of cold material to increase above the reference case with feedback. One of the very few effects of the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star then, is to slightly increase the amount of cold molecular material in the cloud. In panel (b) of Fig. [\[phases\]](#phases){reference-type="ref" reference="phases"} we show the phase evolution of the material in the simulation of mechanical feedback from the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star. The effect upon the cloud is greater than that of the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star. Whilst the warm fraction remains reasonably constant for the first 2 Myrs, the stellar wind rapidly heats cold cloud material, moving it back into the unstable phase (from where it all originally began in the diffuse initial condition preceding the formation of the molecular cloud at t=0). The unstable phase fraction increases and the cold phase fraction decreases. Over the rest of the star's life though, both the cold and unstable phase fractions continue to grow, at the expense of the warm phase, which drops to below 20% by the time of the supernova, compared to 50% in the reference case at the same time. Clearly the star reduces the amount of cold material formed in the cloud (to 30%, rather than more than 40% in reference case), but is not able to stop the cloud continuing to form cold material. The SN then transports hundreds and eventually thousands of solar masses of SN, wind and then cloud material out of the cloud. The SN rapidly heats nearly 10% of the cloud material into the hot thermal phase (above 10,000 K), but the majority of this material radiatively cools quickly and the fraction of hot material drops back close to zero before the SNR leaves the cloud (from about 0.5 Myrs after the explosion). The major effect of the supernova is to transition nearly 70% of the material on the grid into the thermally unstable phase, mostly from the warm phase. The amount of cold material also decreases very rapidly post-SN, returns briefly to nearly 30% after 0.5 Myrs post explosion-the point at which the SN forward shock has progressed through the cloud-and then decreases as the remnant evolves. These changes can be understood as the sweeping up and ejection of material from the cloud by the SN, whilst the cold cloud material reacts much more slowly. Some of this behaviour is also due to the (SN) shock heating and subsequent cooling of dense material, as found by. The fraction of cold dense material remains at around 20% throughout the post-SN evolution, with a slight increase at late-time, matched by an increase in warm phase material, with the unstable phase feeding into both. Cold molecular components are still present in the simulation, albeit at a 20% fraction rather than the 50% fraction seen without feedback. They have not been destroyed by the supernova, even if the structure of the cloud has been disrupted. It should be noted though that this result is at the limit of applicability of these simulations, as numerical issues are present due to the forward SN shock having long since passed off the grid. In the case of the 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star, we observe many similarities to the case of the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star. The 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star also shows similar changes, though they are more extreme, during the stellar wind phase, with less than half the cold phase material present by the time of supernova, as compared to the reference case, and less than all the other cases. An appreciable fraction of hot thermal phase material is also present, around 5% by the time of supernova. After the SN, the first Myr is also similar to the preceding cases, but after that the evolution is markedly different to the preceding cases. There is no leveling off of the cold phase fraction, nevermind an increase. By the end of the simulation, less than 5% of the material in the computational volume is in the cold phase. The volume is completely dominated by warm phase material-nearly 80% of the total material present-with the remainder in the unstable phase. This is most likely because of the combined strength of the stellar wind and subsequent supernova which completely destroy the parent molecular cloud. Any remaining cold molecular material has been blown out of the computational volume. We can therefore state that it takes more than a 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star to completely disperse a molecular cloud by mechanical feedback under these conditions, but that a 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star is very efficient at this dispersal. In Fig. [\[wndphases\]](#wndphases){reference-type="ref" reference="wndphases"} we plot the mass-weighted temperature-density (in the left column) and pressure-density (in the right column) distributions for the four cases considered in this work, using 200 bins in log density and 200 bins in log temperature/pressure. We also over-plot the approximate thermal equilibrium curve for the heating and cooling prescriptions used in this work. In the first row, we show the distributions 10.97 Myrs through the wind phase for the case of the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star, shortly before complete cloud collapse. Most of the material remains in thermal equilibrium, tracing the equilibrium curve. The two distinct stable phases (warm and cold) are, as expected, in approximate pressure equilibrium with each other. A low density, higher temperature stellar wind bubble (as shown in the bottom row of Fig. [\[wnd-15M\]](#wnd-15M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-15M"}) is indicated by the branch stretching away from the equilibrium curve horizontally to the left at the same P/k \(\sim10^{3.8}\) K cm\(^{-3}\) in the pressure-density distribution. In the second row of Fig. [\[wndphases\]](#wndphases){reference-type="ref" reference="wndphases"}, we show the distributions for the case of the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star at the end of the wind phase. The distributions have the same components on the equilibrium curve that are present in the case of the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star, but there are also other considerable regions. We can identify branches from gas in the wind bubble and the LBV/WR shell. The lower pressure horizontal branch at P/k\(\sim10^{3}\) K cm\(^{-3}\) is the wind bubble, at notably lower pressure and temperature than the previous case. The LBV/WR shell that formed during the last stages of stellar evolution is responsible for the branch and arc of material out of equilibrium at higher pressure. Specifically, the diagonal line that spans from (log(P), log(\(\rho\))) = (6,-1) down toward the tunnel branch at (log(P), log(\(\rho\))) = (3,-3) is the wind injection region and region of undisturbed wind material up to the reverse shock. The reverse shock is indicated by the jump back up in pressure to the over-pressured (with respect to the cloud and other wind bubble tunnel) LBV/WR shell that is itself indicated by the horizontal branch at P/k \(\sim10^{5}\) K cm\(^{-3}\) that arcs back to the equilibrium curve, broadening as it cools and increases in density. The greater power of the wind has also driven a broadening of the distributions, with heated material above the equilibrium curve radiatively cooling towards the equilibrium curve. Cooling by expansion has led to low density, cool gas below the equilibrium curve. The distributions in this case are very similar to the case of the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star in Paper II, despite the marked difference in structures; a bubble in a clumpy cloud here, a tunnel through a filamentary sheet there. Common to both cases and responsible for much structure in these distributions is the LBV/WR shell structure. Looking at the distributions, it is impossible to discern the considerably different overall wind-cloud structure responsible for each. It may be possible to conclude that lower pressure wind branches are indicative of larger, less confined structures. The third and fourth rows of Fig. [\[wndphases\]](#wndphases){reference-type="ref" reference="wndphases"} show the distributions for the cases of the 60 and 120 M\(_{\odot}\) stars and are remarkably similar. Both contain isolated diagonal lines that are again indicative of the wind injection regions and regions of undisturbed WR wind material up to the reverse shock. In both cases, the jump back up in pressure at the reverse shock is at, or just off, the lower density axis boundary of each figure, as can in fact be seen at low density in Figs. [\[wnd-60M\]](#wnd-60M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-60M"} and [\[wnd-120M\]](#wnd-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-120M"}. The greater power of the winds and merger of the LBV/WR material with the whole wind bubble has created a single, broader distribution, pushing more and more material out of equilibrium, until in the case of the 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star, most of the material is out of equilibrium. In Fig. [\[snphases\]](#snphases){reference-type="ref" reference="snphases"} we show the distributions 30 kyrs after the SN for the three simulations with supernovae. Towards the upper left of each distribution is the low density, hot phase, which consists of SN shock heated gas. It is not yet in pressure equilibrium with the warm phase, but evolves towards this equilibrium as the simulation progresses beyond that shown here. The distribution at low density is reasonably wide in pressure and temperature and widens with increasing stellar mass. The reason for this is the presence of both shock heated and adiabatically cooled gas, as noted in a similar analysis of such distributions influenced by feedback simulated by. The SN has also shock-heated an appreciable amount of the cold dense material, spreading the distribution upwards at high density in all three plots. In Fig. [\[snlatephases\]](#snlatephases){reference-type="ref" reference="snlatephases"} we show the mass-weighted temperature-density and pressure-density distributions at late times after the SN for the case of the 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star. We can see the broad distribution is cooling (shifting downwards) in both plots. The material is also moving back towards thermal equilibrium, and by 4.5 Myrs post-SN essentially all the material is back in thermal equilibrium. The evolution of the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) and 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star cases is very similar, albeit with lower amounts of high density material and lower maximum densities in each case (i.e. less material on the right of equivalent plots to those shown in Fig. [\[snlatephases\]](#snlatephases){reference-type="ref" reference="snlatephases"}).
## Total cloud mass
In Fig. [\[cloudmass\]](#cloudmass){reference-type="ref" reference="cloudmass"} we show the variation of total mass in the computational volume with time for the case of each star. The reference case is not shown, as it overlaps the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, highlighting again the little influence of the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star. In the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, the total mass remains approximately the same until the supernova (at 32.1 Myrs), when the SN event drives mass out of the computational volume. The wind phase of the 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star drives a few hundred solar masses of material out of the computational volume, before the supernova (at 31.1 Myrs) expels considerably more mass. In both the 40 and 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star cases, the majority of mass remains on the grid post-SN until beyond the end of the simulations. Most of it is out of equilibrium in the thermally unstable temperature range, as revealed by the preceding plots in this sub-section. Even by the time of supernova (at 30.1 Myrs), the wind from the 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star has already driven nearly 2,000 M\(_{\odot}\) of material out of volume-more than 10% of the cloud's original 16,500 M\(_{\odot}\). Most of this expulsion occurred during the stellar evolution off the Main Sequence, during the final Myr or so of the star's life. The expulsion of mass continues during the SN phase, until 6 Myrs post-SN, only 20% of the initial mass remains in the simulation. As such, the cloud has been effectively dispersed and a larger simulation is required to track the final properties of this material. This would suggest that whilst the star has destroyed the cloud and replaced it with a tenuous warm-phase SNR surrounded by warm medium, some cold material may have survived the violent evolution of the 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star, but is now entirely separate from its origins in the parent molecular cloud. In Fig. [\[boundmass\]](#boundmass){reference-type="ref" reference="boundmass"} we show the variation of mass gravitationally bound to the potential of the cloud in the computational volume with time for the case of each star. That is, we show the amount of mass within the gravitational potential well of the original cloud that does not have enough kinetic energy to escape the gravitational potential of the cloud. Here is the only place the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star has an appreciable effect over the reference case, although by the end of the star's evolution, the amount of gravitationally bound mass has returned to the same level as the case without feedback. In the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, the main sequence evolution of the star provides enough energy for nearly half the mass of the cloud to overcome the gravitational energy and either leave the domain, or have enough kinetic energy to overcome the gravitational potential, but the late stages of evolution increase the amount of mass associated with the cloud. The effect of the supernova is to disperse the remainder of the cloud, although 2 Myrs after the SN, the amount of gravitationally bound mass is increasing again, indicating that the increasing levels of cold material noted previously are now bound to the cloud itself. The 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star shows a similar, but more disruptive pattern, with the cold molecular material formed more than 2 Myrs post-SN now associated with the cloud. There is considerably less material in this case. The 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star is able to completely disperse the cloud material during the star's lifetime (\(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}3 Myrs), confirming the conclusions drawn above. No increase post-SN is noted.
## Mixing
In Fig. [\[windmixing\]](#windmixing){reference-type="ref" reference="windmixing"} we show the mixing of the stellar wind material with cloud material. In the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star case, wind material is immediately well mixed and remains that way, since it is all at fractions of no higher than 20% with respect to the cloud material. Whilst an equivalent amount of material to the star's mass was taken out of the injection region to make the star, some cloud material remained in the injection region and the wind material was introduced as a source term adding to this, hence the wind material mixed very quickly. There is no brief period when the injection region is almost entirely wind material i.e. there is no transition observed from "no mixing\" (at 100%) down to well mixed. Therefore, the initial few thousand years of stellar wind may be quite effectively quenched, but this is a transitory period and outweighed by the benefit of using a source term rather than an imposed wind structure in those cells, which tests and previous experience has shown can impose grid-based structure upon the resulting wind. The wind from the main sequence phase of the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star is almost as well mixed as that of the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star. In this case, the brief initial period of mixing down from almost 100% in the injection region is indicated by a very small initial peak, due to the stronger stellar wind. However, the final 0.5 Myrs of stellar wind injection shows the isolated and unmixed nature of the LBV/WR shell, and also how much material is in the shell, given the height of the peak. At 32.08 Myrs, the SN explodes and in short time mixes the wind material down to concentrations of below 20% wind material. Both the 60 and 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star cases show peaks of unmixed material in the final stages of stellar evolution, but with decreasing levels, down to the 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star case where the majority of wind material remains efficiently well-mixed throughout the star's lifetime, albeit with larger fractions of other levels of mixing than in any of the other cases. Peaks and troughs in the final stages of stellar evolution can be attributed to the different phases of the stellar wind and transitory shells that arise during these stages. The effect of the supernova on the mixing of wind material is similar and is very efficient in all cases. In Fig. [\[snmixing\]](#snmixing){reference-type="ref" reference="snmixing"} we show the mixing of supernova material with cloud and wind material in the three supernova cases presented in this work. In panel (a) we focus upon the early mixing of the supernova ejecta, in the first few hundred thousand years following the explosion of the 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star. Initially all the SN material is unmixed (80-100%), remaining so for a few thousand years and then is slowly mixed down into the more mixed brackets in this figure. Within 0.1 Myrs though, the SN material is efficiently mixed down to 0-20% fractions within the cloud/wind material. At later times, the SN material continues to remain well mixed. Mixing is more efficient, taking less time to completely reach the 0-20% brackets for the more massive stars. For these simulations, as for those in Paper II, we have not quantitatively examined the nature of the material leaving the grid. In the three more massive cases, the SN drives material out of the cloud, as investigations of the phase fractions of material have shown. Further investigations may shed more light on mass-loading and the entrainment of material leaving the grid.
# Discussion
## Comparisons to previous work
Comparing the present work with our previous efforts in the hydrodynamic case is not straightforward due to the large differences in initial conditions. However, there are some clear similarities. In both, the later wind energy and SN energy is transferred to the wider surroundings through a multitude of porous channels. In Rogers & Pittard this was as a result of the imposed initial condition and was associated with a much higher density filamentary cloud in a smaller volume. Here, the early phases of the stellar wind result in similar channels and gaps, even though the initial condition is that of a clumpy cloud with no filamentary network. This finding, of clear gaps and channels carved out through parental molecular clouds, would appear to be a common evolutionary conclusion when mechanical feedback from stars is involved. Only when a magnetic field is present, effectively focussing the outflow from a massive star into a single channel as we found in Paper II, are the results morphologically and quantitatively different. Nevertheless, it is clear that winds are on the whole quite capable of breaking out of their confining clouds. Such 'leakage' of the hot gas is consistent with the much lower mass of hot cluster gas than expected for the cluster ages and the mass-loss rates of stars and by energy budget considerations. In common with Rogers & Pittard, the densest molecular regions are surprisingly resistant to ablation by the stellar/cluster wind. In both works this is partially due to shielding by other dense regions closer to the star/cluster. Pressure gradients within the flow appear to rearrange the molecular cloud structure into radially-aligned spokes or filaments, so that the head of the spoke closest to the star shields the remainder of the structure. Further simulations are required to investigate whether this behaviour extends to clumpy clouds of higher mass and density. In common with all our previous work, SNe are able to transport large amounts of energy directly out of the parent cloud, with existing channels and gaps allowing weaker coupling to the remaing dense material. Such channels are further carved out by the SN. The key factor is the shaping effect of the pre-SN stellar winds, which make the cloud highly porous, or as in Paper II where they are focussed by magnetic fields to open up large-scale channels directing SN energy out of the cloud. In all cases, the winds appear to be better at removing molecular material from the cloud/cluster environment, despite typically injecting less energy than the SN(e). The molecular material in all cases was found to be almost completely removed from the original cloud after 6 Myr post-SN. These works together demonstrate the complexity of the interaction of a stellar wind with an inhomogeneous environment. The results are far removed from simple spherically symmetric models and compare nicely with the simulations of who argue that strong pre-supernova (radiative) feedback is required to allow supernova blastwaves to propagate efficiently into the interstellar medium. A key common finding between this work and Paper II is that lower mass stars (15 M\(_{\odot}\) or less) have little global effect on the parent cloud. Here we find that the weak wind is unable to overcome the gravitational collapse of the cloud. In Paper II, the local small bipolar wind bubble is eventually refilled by the slow wind from the late stages of the star's evolution, as we also note here. The effect in both cases is as if the stellar wind had not been present at all. considered stellar wind feedback into an inhomogeneous environment and postulated that the non-uniform surrounding medium causes gaps in the swept-up shell surrounding the wind-blown bubble where some of the high-pressure gas in the bubble interior can leak out. We have simulated a scenario very similar to this, with a stellar wind expanding into a non-uniform, inhomogeneous clumpy cloud. For the intermediate mass cases (stars of mass 40 M\(_{\odot}\) and 60 M\(_{\odot}\)) we find exactly that-the wind shell is non-spherical and has gaps or channels through it which allow gas to vent or blow out of the parent cloud. In the case of the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star, this effect is far less pronounced-the bubble which forms remains close to the star (within 10 or so parsecs) and no gaps or channels are seen around or outside the bubble. At the other extreme, the wind-bubble around the 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star destroys half the cloud by the end of the wind phase, and channels are present through the remaining cloud. In this case, dramatic structural changes occur within the cloud near the end of the star's life due to the increasingly powerful wind blowing at this time. The effect of stellar winds on molecular clouds has also been considered by and. These simulations used either momentum driven or isothermal winds and so give a lower limit to their impact. With this is mind, concluded that stellar mass-loss rates for individual stars must be greater than 10\(^{-7}\) M\(_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\) in order to reproduce shell properties. As we noted in Paper II, the mass-loss rates for the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star are less than \(3 \times 10^{-7}\) M\(_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\) this limit for the entire MS evolution of the star (see figure 2 of Paper II). When the mass-loss rate exceeds this limit the star is in its RSG phase, so the wind is slow and has little power. On the other hand, the higher mass stars always have mass-loss rates above this limit (as shown in Figs. [\[60evolution\]](#60evolution){reference-type="ref" reference="60evolution"} and [\[120evolution\]](#120evolution){reference-type="ref" reference="120evolution"} of the current paper and figure 3 of Paper II). Therefore our findings are not in disagreement with, although we have not tested stars with masses between 15 M\(_{\odot}\) and 40 M\(_{\odot}\). The wind from the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star has little effect on the parent cloud, restricted to a 10 pc radius around the star. In contrast, the winds from higher mass stars strongly affect the parent molecular cloud. Numerous recent works have explored the effects of supernovae on the multi-phase ISM and parent molecular clouds. However, there is still much disagreement on the ability of supernovae to drive outflows. For instance, found that strong outflows were only generated when SNe were randomly positioned and had the opportunity to inject energy into relatively low density environments. SNe placed at density peaks instead radiate away too much energy to drive any noticeable outflow. However, they did not account for the effect of the SN-preceding stellar wind. In contrast,, who accounted for the production of cosmic rays in supernova events, showed that outflows can be driven from SNe placed at density peaks. They found their outflows have similar mass loading as obtained from random placement of SNe with no cosmic rays. find that single SNe disperse \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 pc-sized regions but do not disrupt entire clouds, which instead requires clustered, short-interval SNe to form large hot bubbles. This is in contrast to our findings, but in mitigation our simulations focus on feedback in a cloud of lower mass than the and studies, and also include the effect of the stellar wind, so it is not unexpected that our conclusions are somewhat different. Compared to these other works, our simulations clearly show that when stars are placed at high density locations, their stellar winds can create gaps and carve channels out of the clumps and the parent cloud, allowing wind material and SN material to escape easily from the cloud, mass-loaded with material stripped from clumps in the parent cloud ( also find that pre-SN feedback enhances the impact of SNe). Thus the prior influence of winds should be included in simulations involving SN feedback.
## Comparison to observations
support the scenario presented by, concluding that leakage through gaps in the swept-up wind-blown bubble may be occurring within 30 Doradus. They claim that the lower X-ray gas pressure relative to the direct radiation pressure suggests that the hot gas is only partially confined and is hence leaking out of "pores" in the Hii shell. They also conclude that the significant radiation pressure near the central star cluster indicates that direct stellar radiation pressure dominated the interior dynamics at earlier times, but this claim has proved far more controversial, and other works are in favour of the thermal pressure of hot X-ray emitting plasma shaping the large-scale structure and dynamics in 30 Doradus. For example, find that the dynamics and large-scale structure of 30 Doradus are set by a confined system of X-ray bubbles in rough pressure equilibrium with each other and with the confining molecular gas. In both the 60 and 120 M\(_{\odot}\) cases presented herein, we find a structure of wind and cloud material in rough pressure equilibrium, as shown in Fig. [\[wndphases\]](#wndphases){reference-type="ref" reference="wndphases"}. The existence of low-density channels carrying hot wind material is also clear from Figs. [\[wnd-40M\]](#wnd-40M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-40M"} and [\[wnd-120M\]](#wnd-120M){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-120M"}. The more powerful the wind, the larger the cavity, the quicker the channels form and the wider they are, implying that a cluster of stellar winds will rapidly form multiple wide channels through a low-mass parent molecular cloud such as studied here. However, to determine whether hot gas thermal pressure or direct radiation pressure is dominant requires simulations with both mechanical and radiative feedback included. further assessed the role of stellar feedback at intermediate scales of 10-100 pc. They studied a sample of 32 Hii regions (with ages from 3-10 Myr) in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds and found that warm ionized gas dominates the dynamics whilst the hot gas pressures are comparatively weak. They emphasize that younger, smaller Hii regions should be studied to elucidate the roles of hot gas and direct pressure in the early evolution of these regions. They also conclude that the hot gas is only partially confined in all of their sources, and suggest that hot gas leakage is common. Our simulations are by design influenced only by hot gas pressure, but nevertheless create the kind of structures observed by and others. It is also interesting to note the existence of structures within Hii regions. For example, in RCW 120 arcs of dust emission are clearly seen within the Hii region bubble in mid-IR *Spitzer* data. interpret this as the outer edge of the wind-blown-bubble. An alternative viewpoint is that dust arcs are waves induced by photo-evaporation flows inside Hii bubbles. Our simulations, although not able to define the extent of the Hii region, do show complex structure within the wind bubble itself, for example bow shocks and LBV/WR shells, which could perhaps also lead to such observed structures. Such arcs could also be related to the aligned radial structures formed in the simulation of the 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star. Photoionisation of the complex structures formed by the 60 and 120 M\(_{\odot}\) stars is bound to show one-sided Hii regions too, as the stellar wind has blown out the molecular cloud in unequal measure around the star, as shown in Figure [\[wnd-proj\]](#wnd-proj){reference-type="ref" reference="wnd-proj"}. Some Hii regions (e.g. RCW 79, RCW 82, RCW 120) show a central hole in the 24 \(\mu\)m emission, which may also be evidence of stellar winds. However, these holes could also have been produced by radiation pressure. Simulations by show that stellar winds can have important dynamical effects even when the ratio of the injected wind to ionizing photon energy is as low as 0.01, but it is not known if this remains true at still lower ratios. Two "smoking guns" which reveal strong evidence for the potential impact of stellar winds are bowshocks around stars on the periphery of stellar clusters, and diffuse X-ray emission within and around young pre-SN clusters. However, it is clear that further observational and theoretical work is needed for a better understanding of the dynamics of Hii regions and wind-blown-bubbles/cluster outflows.
# Summary and conclusions {#conclusions}
In this work we have explored the effects of mechanical stellar wind and supernova (SN) feedback on realistic molecular clouds without magnetic fields. Our initial condition has been based on the work of in which a diffuse atomic cloud was allowed to form structure through the action of the thermal instability, under the influence of gravity, but without injected turbulence. The resulting structure is best described as a clumpy near-spherical cloud of approximately 100 pc-diameter surrounded by a diffuse atomic cloud, when we introduce mechanical stellar feedback. The clumps are roughly equally distributed over the inner region of the cloud (r\(\leq\)`<!-- -->`{=html}50 pc) when the densities in some clumps reach 100 cm\(^{-3}\). A single massive star was then introduced at the highest density location closest to the centre of the cloud. We considered four cases: formation of a 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star, a 40 M\(_{\odot}\) star, a 60 M\(_{\odot}\) star and a 120 M\(_{\odot}\) star. Their stellar winds (based on realistic Geneva non-rotating stellar evolution models) subsequently affect the parent cloud, and at the end of life of the three highest mass stars a SN explosion is modelled. We do not model a SN explosion in the case of the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star as the cloud collapses under gravity before the end of the star's life and the simulation loses meaning at the resolution available. In the 15 M\(_{\odot}\) star case the stellar wind has very little effect on the molecular cloud, and forms only a small cavity around the star which reduces in size as the cloud collapses and the star enters the final stages of stellar evolution. The stellar wind is unable to support the wind-blown bubble against the surrounding gravitational collapse of the cloud. In the more massive star cases, the stellar wind has a significant effect on the molecular cloud, carving channels and gaps through the cloud which are reminiscent of the interaction seen in our previous work. Each star's wind halts the gravitational collapse of the cloud. The density, temperature, pressure and velocity of material in the cloud environment all span many orders of magnitude. The hottest gas typically occurs at the reverse shock of the stellar wind, and cools as it expands away from the cloud and mixes in with denser surrounding material. A multitude of weaker shocks form around the remaining dense clumps within the cloud and material is ablated from these into the stellar wind flow, as they also rearrange and form radially aligned spokes in the cloud. This change of structure allows self-shielding to occur and for cold molecular cloud material to survive for the lifetime of the star, both in these shielded spokes and entrained into the wind escaping the cloud along the channels. In the most massive (120 M\(_{\odot}\)) star case, nearly half the molecular cloud is dispersed and destroyed during the final stages of stellar evolution, before the SN occurs. The channels through the wind bubble allow the forward shock of the SN to leave the wind structure very quickly through these 'leaky gaps'. In the cases of both the 60 M\(_\odot\) and 120 M\(_\odot\) stars, along these wind-carved channels the forward shock leaves the computational volume after only 15,000 years, at an average speed of over 4,500 km s\(^{-1}\), efficiently transporting kinetic and thermal energy into surroundings beyond the parent molecular cloud. The SN subsequently continues this dispersal and destruction, overrunning the structures formed during the wind phase. In all three cases, by 2.5 Myrs after the SN, material with the characteristics of the warm neutral medium surrounds a low-density inner cavity (the central region of the SNR) at the original location of the isolated star. It can be concluded from this work that stellar winds from the lower mass end of the range of stars undergoing core-collapse have little effect on their parent cloud. In such cases, the cloud is likely to evolve subject to gravity, radiation pressure, and external influences, until the star explodes. In contrast, higher mass stars are able to disperse and destroy the cold molecular material of the parent cloud even before SNe occur. Massive stars of intermediate mass carve channels and gaps through their parent clouds, allowing SN material to remain fairly hot and energetic as it escapes [see also @rogers13; @rogers14; @wareing17]. In this work, as in, we have taken a single initial condition, realistically formed from the action of the thermal instability, but none-the-less in isolation and at the lower end of molecular cloud masses. Molecular cloud masses in the Milky Way reach 10\(^{5-6}\) M\(_{\odot}\), considerably more than the 16,500 M\(_{\odot}\) of material in the cloud investigated here. The nature and distribution of this material is key to how the stellar winds and SN affect the molecular cloud. In future work we will examine feedback into higher mass clouds and also account for radiative feedback effects. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:08:26', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01844', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01844'} |
# Introduction {#sec:intro}
The explosive growth of mobile traffic demand is the driving force behind the development of signal processing and communication technologies to significantly upgrade the high-end experiences of communication such as high throughput, high reliability, and ubiquitous access. It is widely believed that interference-limited techniques such as coordinated multipoint transmission (CoMP), which treat interference as noise cannot meet the edge throughput requirements for 5G. Dirty-paper coding (DPC), under which the interference is successively mitigated, can improve both the edge and sum throughput but is difficult to implement in practice and remains only as a theoretical concept due to its high computational complexity. Nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) has been recently recognized as an essential enabling technology for 5G systems due to its potential to improve the edge throughput. In NOMA, a base station (BS) transmits a signal superposition to all users. The users are paired so that in each pair there is one with a better channel condition and another with a poorer channel condition. The messages intended for each pair of users are sequentially decoded as follows. First, the message for the user with the poorer channel condition is decoded by both users. The message for the user with the better channel condition is then successively decoded by this user after canceling the interference from the other user . Thus, while the throughput at the users with poorer channel condition remains the same as that in interference-limited techniques, the throughput at the users with better channel condition is clearly improved, leading to a higher system throughput. Multi-input multi-output (MIMO) is widely known for its enormous potential in improving the capacity of wireless communication systems without requiring extra bandwidth or power. NOMA for MIMO communication (MIMO-NOMA) in single-cell systems for achieving higher throughput has been investigated in, and an extension to multi-cell cases has been considered in. In multi-cell systems, the effects of inter-cell interference are acute and unpredictable, limiting the quality-of-service (QoS) for cell-edge users. It is therefore challenging to realize the benefit that NOMA may bring to multi-cell systems.
## Related Works
In this subsection we discuss the state-of-the-art of signal processing techniques for NOMA downlink transmission. NOMA was mostly studied for single-cell multi-input single-output (MISO) systems known as MISO-NOMA, where the multiple-antenna BS broadcasts signal superpositions to single-antenna users. Under the assumption on low QoS requirement for the near user (with a good channel condition) and high QoS requirement for the far user (with a poor channel condition) in a two-user MISO-NOMA, proposed a heuristic computational procedure with neither convergence nor optimality guaranteed for the beamforming power minimization. Under similar users' QoS requirements in a \(2K\)-user MISO-NOMA, it used a particular zero-forcing beamformer to cancel the inter-pair interference, so the problem of \(2K\)-user MISO-NOMA beamforming is decomposed into \(K\) independent subproblems of two-user MISO-NOMA beamforming. A closed-form solution for minimization of beamforming power in two-user MISO-NOMA subject to natural users' QoS requirements was obtained in. In , users performed successive interference cancellation (SIC) based on the channel gain differences. Its proposed algorithm for beamforming is of high computational complexity. Regarding MIMO-NOMA, and derived the outage probability experienced by users in zero-forcing postcoding or signal alignment. Power allocation for achieving the ergodic capacity of two-user MIMO NOMA was considered in and. User-pairing to enhance the throughput of users of poor channel condition was proposed in. proposed two interference alignment based coordinated beamforming for a two-cell MIMO-NOMA, where the interference at all cell-center users and edge-center users is canceled.
## Motivation and Contributions
The paper considers the problem of designing linear precoders/beamformers at the BSs for MIMO-NOMA multi-cell systems to maximize their sum throughput while simultaneously meeting the users' QoS requirements. In general, such a design problem is very complicated as the objective function is nonlinear and nonsmooth, and the QoS constraints are highly nonconvex, for which even finding a feasible point is already challenging. The main contributions of the paper are three-fold:
- For MIMO-NOMA, two path-following optimization algorithms are proposed for computation, which at least converge to a locally optimal solution. At each iteration, the first algorithm invokes a convex quadratic program while the second algorithm invokes a semi-definite program (SDP). Both these convex programs are of moderate dimension so their computation is very efficient.
- Another path-following algorithm tailored for MISO-NOMA is proposed, which explores much simpler structures of the throughput functions in MISO systems for more efficient computation.
- The provided numerical results show the essential performance improvements of NOMA based systems compared to the conventional systems. The capability of NOMA to improve both edge and sum throughput is revealed.
## Paper Organization and Notation
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section [2](#sec:sys_model){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:sys_model"} presents the system model and formulates the problem. A convex quadratic programming based path-following algorithm for the MIMO-NOMA problem is developed in Section [3](#sec:CQBI){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:CQBI"}, while another SDP based path-following algorithm is developed in Section [4](#SDPBI){reference-type="ref" reference="SDPBI"}. Section [5](#sec:TL){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:TL"} devotes to computation for MISO-NOMA problem. Numerical results are provided in Section [6](#sec:simulation){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:simulation"}, and Section [7](#sec:conclusion){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:conclusion"} concludes the paper. *Notation.* Bold-faced upper-case letters are used for matrices, bold-faced lower-case letters are used for vectors, and lower-case letters are used for for scalars. \(\mathbf{I}_n\) is the identity matrix of size \(n\times n\). \(\mathbf{X}^{H}\), \(\mathbf{X}^{T}\), and \(\mathbf{X}^{*}\) are the Hermitian transpose, normal transpose, and conjugate of a matrix \(\mathbf{X}\), respectively. The inner product \(\langle{\mathbf{X}, \mathbf{Y}}\rangle\) of matrices \(\mathbf{X}\) and \(\mathbf{Y}\) is defined as \(\textrm{trace}(\mathbf{X}^H \mathbf{Y})\). Denote by \(\langle \mathbf{A}\rangle\) the trace of a matrix \(\mathbf{A}\), and by \(|\mathbf{A}|\) its determinant. \(\|\cdot\|\) stands for matrix's Frobenius norm or vector's Euclidean norm. For Hermitian symmetric matrices \(\mathbf{A}\succeq \mathbf{0}\) (\(\mathbf{A}\succ \mathbf{0}\), resp.) means that \(\mathbf{A}\) is a positive semidefinite (positive definite, resp.) matrix. Accordingly \(\mathbf{A} \succeq \mathbf{B}\) (\(\mathbf{A} \succ \mathbf{B}\), resp.) means \(\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{B}\succeq \mathbf{0}\) (\(\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{B}\succ \mathbf{0}\), resp.). \(\mathbb{C}\) is the set of all complex numbers, and \(\emptyset\) is an empty set. \(\Re\{x\}\) denotes the real part of a complex number \(x\). \(\mathbf{x}\sim\mathcal{CN}(\boldsymbol{\eta},\boldsymbol{Z})\) means that \(\mathbf{x}\) is a random vector following a complex circular Gaussian distribution with mean \(\boldsymbol{\eta}\) and covariance matrix \(\boldsymbol{Z}\). \(\nabla_{\mathbf{x}}f(\mathbf{x})\) is the gradient of function \(f(\cdot)\) with respect to its variable \(\mathbf{x}\). \(\mathbb{E}\{\cdot\}\) denotes the expectation operator.
# System Model and Problem Formulation {#sec:sys_model}
This section presents a system model for signal superposition in MIMO-NOMA multi-cell systems and formulates an optimization problem for the precoder design. Relations to CoMP and DPC are also briefly clarified.
## Signal Processing Model
Consider a downlink system consisting of \(N\) cells, where the BS of each cell is equipped with \(N_t\) antennas to serve \(2K\) users (UEs) within its cell as illustrated in Fig. [\[fig:SM:1\]](#fig:SM:1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SM:1"}. Each UE is equipped with \(N_r\) antennas. In each cell, there are \(K\) near UEs (cell-center UEs), which are located inside the circular area with radius \(r_n\) and the BS at its center, and \(K\) far UEs (cell-edge UEs), which are located within the ring area with inner radius \(r_n\) and outer radius \(r_o\). \(K\) far UEs in each cell are not only in poorer channel conditions than other \(K\) near UEs but also are under more intensified inter-cell interference from adjacent cells. Upon denoting \(\mathcal{I} \triangleq \{1, 2, \cdots, N\}\) and \(\mathcal{J} \triangleq \{1, 2, \cdots, 2K\}\), the \(j\)-th UE in the \(i\)-th cell is referred to as UE \((i,j)\in \mathcal{S}\triangleq \mathcal{I}\times\mathcal{J}\). The cell-center UEs are UE \((i,j)\), \(j\in\mathcal{K}_1\triangleq\{1,\cdots, K\}\) while the cell-edge UEs are UE \((i,j)\), \(j\in\mathcal{K}_2\triangleq\{K+1,\cdots, 2K\}\). Thus the set of cell-center UEs and the set of cell-edge UEs are \(\mathcal{S}_1\triangleq \mathcal{I}\times \mathcal{K}_1\) and \(\mathcal{S}_2\triangleq \mathcal{I}\times \mathcal{K}_2\), respectively. In NOMA each cell-center UE \((i,j)\in\mathcal{S}_1\) is randomly paired with cell-edge UE \((i,p(j))\in \mathcal{S}_2\) of the same cell to create a virtual cluster.[^1] The signal superpositions are precoded at the BSs prior to being transmitted to the UEs. Specifically, the message intended for UE \((i,j)\) is \(\mathbf{s}_{i,j} \in \mathbb{C}^L\) with \(\mathbb{E}\{\mathbf{s}_{i,j}(\mathbf{s}_{i,j})^H\}=\mathbf{I}_L\), which is precoded by matrix \(\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\in \mathbb{C}^{N_t\times L}\), where \(L\) is the number of concurrent data streams and \(L \leq \min\{N_t,N_r\}\). For notational convenience, let us define \(\mathbf{V} \triangleq [\mathbf{V}_{i,j}]_{(i,j)\in\mathcal{S}}\). The received signals at UE \((i,j)\) and UE \((i,p(j))\) are expressed as
and
where \(\mathbf{H}_{s,i,j} \in\mathbb{C}^{N_r \times N_t}\) is the MIMO channel from the BS \(s\in\mathcal{I}\) to UE \((i,j)\in\mathcal{S}\). The entries of the additive noise \(\mathbf{n}_{i,j}\in\mathbb{C}^{N_r}\) are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) noise samples with zero mean and variance \(\sigma^2\). The covariances of \(\mathbf{y}_{i,j}\) and \(\mathbf{y}_{i,p(j)}\) are thus \[\label{eqLMij} {\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}(\mathbf{V})= \displaystyle\sum_{(s,l)\in{\cal S}}\mathbf{H}_{s,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{s,l}\mathbf{V}_{s,l}^H \mathbf{H}_{s,i,j}^H + \sigma^2\mathbf{I}_{N_r},\] and \[\label{eqLMipj} {\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V})= \displaystyle\sum_{(s,l)\in{\cal S}}\mathbf{H}_{s,i,p(j)}\mathbf{V}_{s,l}\mathbf{V}_{s,l}^H \mathbf{H}_{s,i,p(j)}^H + \sigma^2\mathbf{I}_{N_r}.\] The purpose of the paper is to design complex-valued precoding matrices \(\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\) to maximize the overall spectral efficiency under a given pairing for NOMA. The MIMO channel states \(\mathbf{H}_{s,i,j}\) are assumed unchanged during message transmission but may change independently from one message to another and are perfectly known at all nodes.
## Problem Formulation
In NOMA, the message \(\mathbf{s}_{i,p(j)}\) intended for the cell-edge UE \((i,p(j))\) is decoded by both UE \((i, p(j))\) and UE \((i,j)\). Then message \(\mathbf{s}_{i,j}\) intended for the cell-center UE \((i,j)\) is decoded by itself only. The cell-edge UE \((i,p(j))\) decodes its own message \(\mathbf{s}_{i,p(j)}\) with the achievable rate
where \({\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,p(j)}^{p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\) is defined by
On the other hand, the cell-center UE \((i,j)\) decodes the message \(\mathbf{s}_{i,p(j)}\) with the achievable rate
where
Hence, the throughput by decoding the message \(\mathbf{s}_{i,p(j)}\) by UEs \((i,p(j))\) and \((i,j)\) is \[\label{noma1} {\cal R}_{i,p(j)}=\min \Bigl\{{\cal R}^{j}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V}), {\cal R}^{p(j)}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\Bigr\}.\] Next, the throughput by decoding the message \(\mathbf{s}_{i,j}\) by the cell-center UE \((i,j)\) after decoding the message \(\mathbf{s}_{i,p(j)}\) is \[\label{noma2} {\cal R}_{i,j}(\mathbf{V}) = \ln\Bigl| \mathbf{I}_L + (\mathbf{V}_{i,j})^H\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}^H{\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}^{p}(\mathbf{V})^{-1}\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j} \Bigl|\] where
Our goal is to maximize the total sum throughput of the system under QoS for each individual UE and power budget at each BS, which is mathematically formulated as
where \(P^{\max}_i\) in [\[Rmtgord\]](#Rmtgord){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgord"} is the transmit power budget of BS \(i\). The QoS constraints [\[Rmtgorc\]](#Rmtgorc){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgorc"} and [\[Rmtgord\]](#Rmtgord){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgord"} set a minimum throughput requirement \(r_{i,j}\) at the UE \((i,j)\) and \(r_{i,p(j)}\) at the UE \((i,p(j))\).
## Relations to CoMP and DPC
In CoMP, the problem of maximizing the sum throughput under QoS constraints is formulated as
where \({\cal R}_{i,j}^{'}(\mathbf{V})\) is given by \[\label{eq:Rij:CoMP} {\cal R}_{i,j}^{'}(\mathbf{V}) = \ln\Bigl|\mathbf{I}_L + (\mathbf{V}_{i,j})^H\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}^H{\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}^{j}(\mathbf{V})^{-1}\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\Bigl|\] with \[\begin{array}{lll} {\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}^{j}(\mathbf{V}) \triangleq \displaystyle\ds\sum_{(s,l)\in{\cal S}\setminus\{(i,j)\}}\mathbf{H}_{s,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{s,l}\mathbf{V}_{s,l}^H \mathbf{H}_{s,i,j}^H + \sigma^2\mathbf{I}_{N_r}. \end{array}\] Compared \({\cal R}_{i,j}^{'}(\mathbf{V})\) defined by \((\ref{eq:Rij:CoMP})\) to \({\cal R}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\) and \({\cal R}_{i,j}(\mathbf{V})\) defined by ([\[noma1\]](#noma1){reference-type="ref" reference="noma1"}) and ([\[noma2\]](#noma2){reference-type="ref" reference="noma2"}) one can see that
and \[{\cal R}_{i,j}^{'}(\mathbf{V})\leq {\cal R}_{i,j}(\mathbf{V}),\ \forall j\in\mathcal{K}_1,\label{com4}\] i.e., under the same precoder \(\mathbf{V}\), the throughput at cell-edge UEs is higher with CoMP while that at cell-center UEs is higher with NOMA. Thus, under the same precoder, NOMA does not need to perform better than CoMP in terms of the total throughput. The preference of NOMA now critically depends on its performance at its optimal precoder, which is sought in the next sections. On the other hand, DPC at the BS \(i\) with encoding order from UE \((i,2K)\) to UE \((i,1)\) enables UE \((i,j)\) view the massages intended for UEs \((i,j')\), \(j'>j\) as non-causually known and thus cancel them from its received signal. Hence, the throughput by decoding the message \(\mathbf{s}_{i,j}\) for UE \((i,j)\) is defined by \[\label{DPC1} {\cal R}_{i,j}^{''}(\mathbf{V}) = \ln\Bigl|\mathbf{I}_L + (\mathbf{V}_{i,j})^H\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}^H{\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}^{i}(\mathbf{V})^{-1}\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j} \Bigl|\] where
The problem of maximizing the sum throughput under QoS constraints is formulated as
Apparently, under DPC the intra-cell interference from UEs of better channel condition is canceled in decoding the messages intended for UEs of poorer channel condition resulting in much better edge throughput compared with CoMP. NOMA is advantageous over DPC in terms of ease of implementation. By increasing the QoSs' requirement in ([\[Rmtgorb\]](#Rmtgorb){reference-type="ref" reference="Rmtgorb"}), ([\[CoMPb\]](#CoMPb){reference-type="ref" reference="CoMPb"}) and ([\[DPCb\]](#DPCb){reference-type="ref" reference="DPCb"}), we will see that the NOMA's sum throughput is fully superior over CoMP's one and catches up DPC's one.
# Convex Quadratic Based Iterations {#sec:CQBI}
Note that the QoS constraints [\[Rmtgorb\]](#Rmtgorb){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgorb"} and [\[Rmtgorc\]](#Rmtgorc){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgorc"} in [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"}, and [\[CoMPb\]](#CoMPb){reference-type="eqref" reference="CoMPb"} in [\[CoMPobj\]](#CoMPobj){reference-type="eqref" reference="CoMPobj"} are set beforehand, which are dependent on the UEs' throughput requirements but independent on their channel condition. In maximizing the sum throughput objective [\[CoMPa\]](#CoMPa){reference-type="eqref" reference="CoMPa"}, most of CoMP techniques (see e.g. ) are unable to address the QoS constraints [\[CoMPb\]](#CoMPb){reference-type="eqref" reference="CoMPb"}. Without setting such QoS constraints, the UEs of poor channel condition are easily disconnected from the service because it is well known that almost all of transmit power will be allocated to a very few UEs of the best channel conditions in maximizing the sum throughput, causing almost zero throughput at other UEs. The weighted sum throughput maximization is only an ad hoc way to balance the UEs' throughput. Alternatively, the throughput satisfaction can be effectively handled via maximizing the users' worst throughput but the latter involves optimization of a nonsmooth objective function, for which these techniques are powerless. Both QoS constrained sum throughput maximization problem [\[CoMPobj\]](#CoMPobj){reference-type="eqref" reference="CoMPobj"} and UEs' worst throughput maximization problem could be addressed very recently in. Although the optimization problem [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"} is different from [\[CoMPobj\]](#CoMPobj){reference-type="eqref" reference="CoMPobj"} and [\[DPCobj\]](#DPCobj){reference-type="eqref" reference="DPCobj"}, all functions appearing in the former have a similar structure to that appearing in the latter. Therefore, a systematic approach to solve the latter is expected to be applicable to the former. In this section, we adopt the approach of to address [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"}. Unlike, which aims at expressing the nonsmooth function \({\cal R}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\) in [\[noma1\]](#noma1){reference-type="eqref" reference="noma1"} and then the nonsmooth objective function in [\[Rmtgorb\]](#Rmtgorb){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgorb"} as d.c. ([d]{.ul}ifference of two [c]{.ul}onvex functions) by using the universality of d.c. functions and leads to d.c. iterations of high computational complexity, we will see now that each below iteration invokes only a simple convex quadratic program of low computational complexity. Suppose that \(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}\triangleq [\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}_{i,j}]_{(i,j)\in\mathcal{S}}\) is a feasible point found at the \((\kappa-1)\)-th iteration. Define the following quadratic functions in \(\mathbf{V}\):
where \(a_{i,p(j)}^{j,(\kappa)}\), \(a_{i,p(j)}^{p(j),(\kappa)}\), \(a_{i,j}^{(\kappa)}\) are given as
and \({\cal A}_{i,p(j)}^{j,(\kappa)}\), \({\cal A}_{i,p(j)}^{p(j),(\kappa)}\), \({\cal A}_{i,j}^{(\kappa)}\) are given as
Note that all functions in ([\[eq:qdt\]](#eq:qdt){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:qdt"}) are concave due to [\[eq:Mij\]](#eq:Mij){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:Mij"}, [\[eq:Mijpj\]](#eq:Mijpj){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:Mijpj"}, and [\[eq:Mipjpj\]](#eq:Mipjpj){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:Mipjpj"}:
The following result shows that the complicated function defined by [\[noma1\]](#noma1){reference-type="eqref" reference="noma1"} and [\[noma2\]](#noma2){reference-type="eqref" reference="noma2"} is lower bounded by concave quadratic functions.
and
Based on these results, at the \(\kappa\)-th iteration, the following convex program, which is an inner approximation for the nonconvex optimization problem [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"}, is solved to generate the next feasible point \(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa+1)}\):
A pseudo-code of this quadratic programing (QP)-based path-following procedure is given by Algorithm [\[alg_SCALE_FW\]](#alg_SCALE_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_SCALE_FW"}. Note that \(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}\) is also feasible for [\[RmtgFWA\]](#RmtgFWA){reference-type="eqref" reference="RmtgFWA"} with \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)})= \mathcal{P}^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)})\) by the equalities in [\[main\]](#main){reference-type="eqref" reference="main"} and [\[mainbound\]](#mainbound){reference-type="eqref" reference="mainbound"}. It is then true that \(\mathcal{P}^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa+1)})>\mathcal{P}^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)})=\mathcal{P}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)})\) whenever \(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa+1)}\neq \mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}\). Together with \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa+1)})\geq \mathcal{P}^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)})\) and according to the inequalities in [\[main\]](#main){reference-type="eqref" reference="main"} and [\[mainbound\]](#mainbound){reference-type="eqref" reference="mainbound"}, we have \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa+1)})>\mathcal{P}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)})\), i.e., the optimal solution \(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa+1)}\) of the convex quadratic problem [\[RmtgFWA\]](#RmtgFWA){reference-type="eqref" reference="RmtgFWA"} is a better point for the nonconvex nonsmooth optimization problem [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"} than \(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}\). Therefore, once initialized from an feasible point \(\mathbf{V}^{(0)})\), the sequence \(\{\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}\}\) obtained by solving [\[RmtgFWA\]](#RmtgFWA){reference-type="eqref" reference="RmtgFWA"} is of improved feasible points for [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"}. By following the same arguments as those in, we can prove that Algorithm [\[alg_SCALE_FW\]](#alg_SCALE_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_SCALE_FW"} converges to a Karush-Kuh-Tucker (KKT) point of [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"}.
Initialized from a feasible point \(\mathbf{V}^{(0)}\) for the convex constraint [\[Rmtgord\]](#Rmtgord){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgord"}, the following iterations are invoked
till reaching a value more than or equal to \(1\) in satisfying [\[Rmtgorb\]](#Rmtgorb){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgorb"}-[\[Rmtgord\]](#Rmtgord){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgord"}. *Complexity Analysis*: Problem [\[RmtgFWA\]](#RmtgFWA){reference-type="eqref" reference="RmtgFWA"} is convex quadratic with \(m_{\text{QP}}=N(1+3K)\) quadratic constraints and \(n=KN(2N_tL+1)\) real decision variables. Its computational complexity is \(\mathcal{O}(n^2m_{\text{QP}}^{2.5}+m_{\text{QP}}^{3.5})\).
# Semi-Definite Programming Based Iterations {#SDPBI}
To further improve the convergence speed of solving [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"}, we need explore more partial convex structures of functions [\[noma1\]](#noma1){reference-type="eqref" reference="noma1"} and [\[noma2\]](#noma2){reference-type="eqref" reference="noma2"}. In this section, we propose a novel SDP-based path-following algorithm for [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"}. To this end, we will use the following matrix inequalities: \[\begin{aligned}
\mathbf{V}^H\mathbf{X}^{-1}\mathbf{V} &\succeq& \bar{\boldsymbol{V}}^H\bar{\boldsymbol{X}}^{-1}\mathbf{V}+ \mathbf{V}^H\bar{\boldsymbol{X}}^{-1}\bar{\boldsymbol{V}} \nonumber\\ &&-\; \bar{\boldsymbol{V}}^H\bar{\boldsymbol{X}}^{-1}\mathbf{X}\bar{\boldsymbol{X}}^{-1}\bar{\boldsymbol{V}}, \nonumber\\ &&\forall\ \mathbf{V}, \bar{\boldsymbol{V}}, \mathbf{X}\succ \mathbf{0}, \bar{\boldsymbol{X}}\succ \mathbf{0}, \label{in1} \end{aligned}\] and \[\begin{aligned}
\ln|\mathbf{X}|&\geq& \ln|\bar{\boldsymbol{X}}|-\bigl\langle \bar{\boldsymbol{X}}, \mathbf{X}^{-1}-\bar{\boldsymbol{X}}^{-1}\bigl\rangle, \nonumber\\ &&\forall\ \mathbf{X}\succ \mathbf{0}, \bar{\boldsymbol{X}}\succ \mathbf{0},\label{in2} \end{aligned}\] whose proofs are given by Appendix A and Appendix B. Let us treat the rate function \({\cal R}_{i,p(j)}^j(\mathbf{V})\) from ([\[eq:Rijpj\]](#eq:Rijpj){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Rijpj"}) first. Applying ([\[in1\]](#in1){reference-type="ref" reference="in1"}) yields
for
which also satisfies
For \({\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}^{p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\) defined from ([\[eq:Mijpj\]](#eq:Mijpj){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Mijpj"}), applying ([\[in1\]](#in1){reference-type="ref" reference="in1"}) again yields \[\begin{aligned}
{\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}^{p(j)}(\mathbf{V}) & \succeq & {\cal L}_{i,j}^{p(j),(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V})+\sigma^2\mathbf{I}_{N_r}\label{lmi1a} \end{aligned}\] over the trust region \[\label{tr1} {\cal L}_{i,j}^{p(j),(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V})\succeq \mathbf{0},\] for the linear mapping \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal L}_{i,j}^{p(j),(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V})\triangleq \displaystyle\sum_{(s,l)\in{\cal S}\setminus\{(i,p(j))\}}\mathbf{H}_{s,i,j} \Bigl[\mathbf{V}_{s,l}(\mathbf{V}_{s,l}^{(\kappa)})^H \nonumber\\ +\; \mathbf{V}_{s,l}^{(\kappa)}\mathbf{V}_{s,l}^H-\mathbf{V}_{s,l}^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V}_{s,l}^{(\kappa)})^H\Bigl] \mathbf{H}_{s,i,j}^H.\label{linear1} \end{aligned}\] It follows from ([\[lmi1\]](#lmi1){reference-type="ref" reference="lmi1"}) that \[\label{lmi1.1} \widetilde{{\cal Q}}^{j,(\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\preceq {\cal Q}^{j,(\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\] for
Therefore,
for
which is a concave function. Inequality ([\[lmi2\]](#lmi2){reference-type="ref" reference="lmi2"}) follows from ([\[lmi1\]](#lmi1){reference-type="ref" reference="lmi1"}) and the condition \[\ln|\mathbf{I}_L+\mathbf{X}|\geq \ln|\mathbf{I}_L+\mathbf{Y}|,\ \forall\ \mathbf{X}\succeq\mathbf{Y}\succeq \mathbf{0}.\] Inequality ([\[l1.0\]](#l1.0){reference-type="ref" reference="l1.0"}) follows by applying ([\[in2\]](#in2){reference-type="ref" reference="in2"}) and using equality \[\ln\bigl|\mathbf{I}_L +\widetilde{{\cal Q}}^{j,(\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}) \bigl|= {\cal R}_{i,p(j)}^j(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}).\] Inequality ([\[l1\]](#l1){reference-type="ref" reference="l1"}) follows from inequality ([\[lmi1\]](#lmi1){reference-type="ref" reference="lmi1"}), equality ([\[match1\]](#match1){reference-type="ref" reference="match1"}), and the condition \[\Bigl\langle \mathbf{M},\mathbf{X}^{-1}\Bigl\rangle \geq \Bigl\langle \mathbf{M},\mathbf{Y}^{-1}\Bigl\rangle, \ \forall\ \mathbf{M}\succeq \mathbf{0}, \mathbf{Y}\succeq \mathbf{X}\succ \mathbf{0}.\] Analogously, the rate function \({\cal R}_{i,p(j)}^{p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\) and throughput function \({\cal R}_{i,j}(\mathbf{V})\) defined from ([\[eq:Rijj\]](#eq:Rijj){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Rijj"}) and ([\[noma2\]](#noma2){reference-type="ref" reference="noma2"}) are lower bounded by
over the trust region \[\label{tr2} {\cal L}_{i,p(j)}^{p(j),(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V})\succeq \mathbf{0},\] and
over the trust region \[\label{tr3} {\cal L}_{i,j}^{p,(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V})\succeq \mathbf{0},\] for linear mappings
and
and for concave functions
and
with
and
We also define \[\label{l4} \widetilde{{\cal R}}^{(\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\triangleq \min\Bigl\{\widetilde{{\cal R}}^{j,(\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V}), \widetilde{{\cal R}}^{p(j),(\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\Bigl\}.\] In summary, at the \(\kappa\)-th iteration, the following SDP, which is an inner approximation of [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"}, is solved to generate the next feasible point \(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa+1)}\):
The proposed Algorithm [\[alg_SDP_FW\]](#alg_SDP_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_SDP_FW"} generates a sequence \(\{\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}\}\) of improved points of [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"}, which also converges to a KKT point.
to reach a value more than or equal to \(1\) in satisfying [\[Rmtgorb\]](#Rmtgorb){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgorb"}-[\[Rmtgord\]](#Rmtgord){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgord"}. *Complexity analysis:* The SDP [\[sdp1\]](#sdp1){reference-type="eqref" reference="sdp1"} involves \(N(1+3K)\) quadratic constraints, \(3NK\) semi-definite constraints with \(N_r\) rows and \(n=KN(2N_tL+1)\) real decision variables. For \(m_{\text{SDP}}\triangleq N(1+3K)+3NKN_r\), its computational complexity is \(\mathcal{O}(n^2m_{\text{SDP}}^{2.5}+m_{\text{SDP}}^{3.5})\), which is seen higher than that of the convex quadratic problem [\[RmtgFWA\]](#RmtgFWA){reference-type="eqref" reference="RmtgFWA"}.
# Tailored algorithm for MISO-NOMA {#sec:TL}
In this case, all channels are row vectors (\(\mathbf{H}_{s,i,j}\in\mathbb{C}^{1\times N_t}\)) and \(s_{i,j}\in\mathbb{C}\) (\(L=1\)). As observed first time in, for \[\label{varch} \bar{\mathbf{V}}_{i,j}=e^{-\jmath {\sf arg}(\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j})}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\] one has \(|\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}|=\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\bar{\mathbf{V}}_{i,j}=\Re\{ \mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\bar{\mathbf{V}}_{i,j}\}\geq 0\) and \(|\mathbf{H}_{i',i,j'}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}|=|\mathbf{H}_{i',i,j'}\bar{\mathbf{V}}_{i,j}|\) for \((i',j')\neq (i,j)\). Therefore, without loss of generality we can replace \[\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}^H\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}^H = \bigl|\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\bigr|^2, \ j=1,\dots, 2K\] by \[\bigl(\Re\{\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\}\bigr)^2, \ j=1,\dots, 2K\] with \[\label{positivereal} \Re\{\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\}\geq 0, \ j=1,\dots, 2K\] (including \(p(j)\) for \(j=K+1...,2K\)). Accordingly, write \[{\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}(\mathbf{V})= \displaystyle\sum_{(s,l)\in{\cal S}}\bigl|\mathbf{H}_{s,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{s,l}\bigr|^2+ \sigma^2.\] Then the message \(\mathbf{s}_{i,p(j)}\) intended for cell-edge UE \((i,p(j))\) is decoded by the cell-center UE \((i,j)\) with the achievable rate \[\label{t1} r_{i,p(j)}^j(\mathbf{V}) = \ln\Biggl(1 + \frac{\bigl|\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,p(j)}\bigr|^2}{{\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}^{p(j)}(\mathbf{V})}\Biggr),\] and is decoded by the cell-edge UE \((i,p(j))\) itself with the achievable rate \[\label{t2} r_{i,p(j)}^{p(j)}(\mathbf{V}) = \ln\Biggl( 1 + \frac{\bigl(\Re\{ \mathbf{H}_{i,i,p(j)}\mathbf{V}_{i, p(j)}\}\bigr)^2}{{\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,p(j)}^{p(j)}(\mathbf{V})} \Biggl)\] where
and
Also, the message \(\mathbf{s}_{i,j}\) intended for the cell-center UE \((i,j)\) is successively decoded by UE \((i,j)\) itself with the throughput \[\label{t3} r_{i,j}(\mathbf{V}) = \ln\Biggr( 1 + \frac{\bigl(\Re\{\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\}\bigr)^2}{ {\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}^{p}(\mathbf{V})} \Biggr)\] where
For \(r_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V}) \triangleq \min\bigl\{r^j_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V}), r^{p(j)}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\bigl\}\), the problem ([\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="ref" reference="Rmtgor"}) in this case is
Due to the above transforms ([\[t2\]](#t2){reference-type="ref" reference="t2"}) and ([\[t3\]](#t3){reference-type="ref" reference="t3"}) under condition ([\[positivereal\]](#positivereal){reference-type="ref" reference="positivereal"}), the nonconvex constraints ([\[beam1b\]](#beam1b){reference-type="ref" reference="beam1b"}) and ([\[beam1c\]](#beam1c){reference-type="ref" reference="beam1c"}) are expressed by the second-order cone (SOC) constraints
but the constraint ([\[beam1d\]](#beam1d){reference-type="ref" reference="beam1d"}) remains to be nonconvex. To approximate functions in ([\[beam1a\]](#beam1a){reference-type="ref" reference="beam1a"}) we use the inequality \[\label{zf8} \ln(1+z)\geq a(\bar{z})-b(\bar{z})\frac{1}{z},\quad \forall\ z>0, \bar{z}>0\] with \[\label{zf9} 0<a(\bar{z}) \triangleq \ln(1+\bar{z})+\displaystyle\frac{\bar{z}}{\bar{z}+1},\ 0<b(\bar{z}) \triangleq \frac{\bar{z}^2}{\bar{z}+1},\] whose proof is provided by Appendix C. Applying ([\[zf8\]](#zf8){reference-type="ref" reference="zf8"}) for \(\bar{z}=z^{j, (\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}\triangleq |\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}|^2/{\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}^{p(j)}(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)})\) and \(z= |\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,p(j)}|^2/{\mathbf{\mathcal{ M}}}_{i,j}^{p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\) yields
over the trust region
Analogously,
with
over the trust region \[\label{trb2} 2\Re\bigl\{\mathbf{H}_{i,i,p(j)}\mathbf{V}_{i,p(j)}\bigl\}-\Re\bigl\{\mathbf{H}_{i,i,p(j)}\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}\bigl\}\; > 0,\] and
with
over the trust region \[\label{trb3} 2\Re\bigl\{\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\bigl\}-\Re\bigl\{\mathbf{H}_{i,i,j}\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa)}_{i,j}\bigl\} > 0.\] In Algorithm [\[alg_Tailored_FW\]](#alg_Tailored_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_Tailored_FW"}, we propose an QP-based path-following algorithm to solve problem ([\[beam1\]](#beam1){reference-type="ref" reference="beam1"}). At the \(\kappa\)-th iteration it solves the following SOC program to generate the next feasible point \(\mathbf{V}^{(\kappa+1)}\):
where \(r_{i,p(j)}^{(\kappa)}(\mathbf{V}) \triangleq \min\Bigl\{r^{j, (\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V}), r^{p(j), (\kappa)}_{i,p(j)}(\mathbf{V})\Bigr\}\).
are invoked for reaching a value more or equal to \(1\) in satisfying constraints in ([\[beam1\]](#beam1){reference-type="ref" reference="beam1"}). *Complexity analysis:* The SOC program [\[beamk\]](#beamk){reference-type="eqref" reference="beamk"} involves \(m_{\text{SOC}}=N(1+6K)\) quadratic or SOC constraints and \(n=KN(2N_tL+1)\) real decision variables. Its computational complexity is \(\mathcal{O}(n^2m_{\text{SOC}}^{2.5}+m_{\text{SOC}}^{3.5})\), which is seen higher than that of the convex quadratic problem [\[RmtgFWA\]](#RmtgFWA){reference-type="eqref" reference="RmtgFWA"}.
# Numerical Results {#sec:simulation}
In this section we use numerical examples to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms. A system topology shown in Fig. [\[fig:SM:RatePerUE\]](#fig:SM:RatePerUE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SM:RatePerUE"} is set up. There are \(N=3\) macro cells and \(4\) UEs per cell with two cell-center UEs and two cell-edge UEs, which are located near to the boundaries with the two adjacent cells. Unless stated otherwise, \(N_t = 4\) and \(N_r = 2\) are set for MIMO-NOMA, for which \(L=N_r\) is set. Thus, the precoder-matrices \(\mathbf{V}_{i,j}\) are of dimension \(N_t\times N_r\). The channel matrix between a BS and a UE at a distance \(d\) (in kilometres) is generated as \(\mathbf{H}=\sqrt{10^{-\sigma_{\mathsf{PL}}/10}}\tilde{\mathbf{H}}\). Here, \(\sigma_{\mathsf{PL}}\) is the path loss (PL) in dB and the entries of \(\tilde{\mathbf{H}}\) are independent and identically distributed complex Gaussian variables with zero mean and unit variance. Without loss of generality, the requirement thresholds for all UEs are set as \(r_{i,j} = r_{i,p(j)}\equiv \bar{\mathsf{R}}\) and the same power budget \(P^{\max}_i = P^{\max},\, \forall i\in\mathcal{I}\) is given to all BSs. For the ease of reference, the other parameters given in Table [\[parameter\]](#parameter){reference-type="ref" reference="parameter"} including \(\bar{\mathsf{R}}\) are used. The error tolerance in the proposed Algorithms is set to \(\epsilon=10^{-3}\). The numerical results are obtained using the parser YALMIP. The achieved sum throughput results are divided by \(\ln(2)\) to arrive at the unit of bps/channel-use. Each simulation is run \(100\) times and the result are averaged to arrive at the final figures.
## Algorithms' Convergence
Fig. [\[fig:Convergencebehavior:Iteration\]](#fig:Convergencebehavior:Iteration){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Convergencebehavior:Iteration"} shows the typical convergence behavior of the proposed algorithms for a given set of channel realizations that are randomly generated for the two cases. According to Fig. [\[fig:Convergencebehavior:Iteration\]](#fig:Convergencebehavior:Iteration){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Convergencebehavior:Iteration"}(a), both Algorithm [\[alg_SCALE_FW\]](#alg_SCALE_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_SCALE_FW"} and [\[alg_SDP_FW\]](#alg_SDP_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_SDP_FW"} for MIMO-NOMA reach the almost optimal value of sum throughput in \(18\) and \(13\) iterations. As expected, Algorithm [\[alg_SDP_FW\]](#alg_SDP_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_SDP_FW"} converges faster than Algorithm [\[alg_SCALE_FW\]](#alg_SCALE_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_SCALE_FW"}. On the other hand, according to Fig. [\[fig:Convergencebehavior:Iteration\]](#fig:Convergencebehavior:Iteration){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Convergencebehavior:Iteration"}(b), Algorithm [\[alg_Tailored_FW\]](#alg_Tailored_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_Tailored_FW"} for NOMA-MISO converges very fast reaching the optimal value in 6 iterations.
## Numerical Results for MIMO-NOMA
For the ease of reference, the result achieved by [\[CoMPobj\]](#CoMPobj){reference-type="eqref" reference="CoMPobj"} is labeled by "Conventional MIMO-CoMP" whereas that achieved by [\[Rmtgor\]](#Rmtgor){reference-type="eqref" reference="Rmtgor"} is labeled by "Proposed MIMO-NOMA." Fig. [\[fig:SRMMIMO:PmaxRbar\]](#fig:SRMMIMO:PmaxRbar){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRMMIMO:PmaxRbar"}(a) plots the sum throughput versus the power budget \(P^{\max}\) under setting \(\bar{\sf R} = \{0,1\}\) bps/Hz. For \(\bar{\sf R}=0\) bps/Hz, i.e. there is no UEs' QoS requirement imposed, CoMP slightly outperforms MIMO-NOMA by achieving throughput concentrated at the cell-center UEs of good conditions. Table [1](#Table:RateperUENoQoS){reference-type="ref" reference="Table:RateperUENoQoS"} details the UEs's throughput distribution for \(P^{\max}=30\) dBm. The high ratio \(9.39/0.38=24.7\) between the best UE throughput and the worst UE throughput (BWR) implies that CoMP would perform wobbly in the QoS maximization problem ([\[qos\]](#qos){reference-type="ref" reference="qos"}) (with \(r_{i,j}\equiv 1\)), which also expresses the system ability to offer the uniform service to UEs. BWR for MIMO-NOMA is \(5.1=7.13/1.39\) so it is expected to outperform CoMP in maximizing ([\[qos\]](#qos){reference-type="ref" reference="qos"}). The low throughput \(1.46\) bps/Hz at UE \((3,4)\) by DPC is a result of a strong interference from an adjacent cell, which cannot be mitigated by DPC. For \(\bar{\sf R}=1\) bps/Hz, MIMO-NOMA of course offers a higher sum throughput than CoMP, where the BSs are seen spending a nearly full power budget \(P^{\max}\) in gaining the sum throughput. Increasing \(P^{\max}\) also leads to a remarkable gain in sum throughput by NOMA compared with CoMP. The sum throughput by the former also catches up that by DPC. The gain of MIMO-NOMA is a result of canceling interference from intra-cluster interference, as shown in [\[eq:Mipjpj\]](#eq:Mipjpj){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:Mipjpj"}. The cell-center UEs in CoMP experience intra-cluster interference that becomes stronger when transmit power increases. The plot of sum throughput versus QoS requirement threshold \(\bar{\mathsf{R}}\in[0.6,\,2.4]\) bps/Hz is shown by Fig. [\[fig:SRMMIMO:PmaxRbar\]](#fig:SRMMIMO:PmaxRbar){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRMMIMO:PmaxRbar"}(b) for \(P^{\max} = 30\) dBm. The sum throughput are nearly flat for \(\bar{\mathsf{R}} \leq 1.2\) bps/Hz and are degraded after that. The BSs in CoMP must allocate much more power to serve cell-edge UEs when QoS threshold increases. As a result, the system sum throughput is dropped quickly. In contrast, the sum throughput of MIMO-NOMA is still slightly sensitive to QoS requirement threshold because BSs can tune the power allocation in meeting cell-edge UEs' QoS requirements whenever the cell-center UEs' QoS requirement is easily met. Fig. [\[fig:SRMMIMO:KN\]](#fig:SRMMIMO:KN){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRMMIMO:KN"} shows the impact of the number of UEs per cell and the number of transmit antennas at the BS on the performance of the system. Fig. [\[fig:SRMMIMO:KN\]](#fig:SRMMIMO:KN){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRMMIMO:KN"}(a) shows that MIMO-NOMA can deliver an acceptable sum throughput for large \(K\). Again, MIMO-NOMA outperforms CoMP in all \(K\). The sum throughput of the both systems decreases from a certain value of \(K\) where there is not much degree-of-freedom (DoF) for leveraging multi-user diversity. Interestingly, MIMO-NOMA achieves its best sum throughput for \(K=3\) (6 UEs) while CoMP is peaked at \(K=2\) (4 UEs). Of course, these numbers are not magic and can be changed in other settings. Fig. [\[fig:SRMMIMO:KN\]](#fig:SRMMIMO:KN){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRMMIMO:KN"}(b) plots the sum throughput vs the number \(N_t\) of antennas at the BSs.
Table [2](#Table:RateperUE){reference-type="ref" reference="Table:RateperUE"} details the throughput at UEs under setting \(N_t=6\) and \(P^{\max}=30\) dBm. Under the same QoS requirement threshold for UEs, the CoMP's throughput is mostly contributed by the cell-center UEs, i.e. CoMP still tends to punish the cell-edge UEs, who are in poor channel condition. Raising the QoS requirement for the cell-edge UEs to counter this discrimination would lead to the risk of CoMP service feasibility. In contrast, in maximizing the system's throughput, MIMO-NOMA offers much fairer and balanced services without contrasting the QoS requirement thresholds so it is very suitable for new quality-of-experience (QoE) services for cell-edge UEs. By Fig. [\[fig:CDFMIMO\]](#fig:CDFMIMO){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CDFMIMO"}, the system's throughput achieved by the proposed precoder design is compared to that achieved by signal alignment MIMO-NOMA (SA MIMO-NOMA) and interfering channel alignment CoMP MIMO-NOMA (ICA-CoMP MIMO-NOMA) in the two-cell scenario with \(K = 4\) users, \(N_t = 5\), while \(N_r = 4\) is set to make the signal and channel alignment feasible. In SA MIMO-NOMA, the inter-cluster interference is canceled by detection vectors based SA technique at the UEs and zero-forcing (ZF) based precoder matrix at the BSs. In ICA-CoMP MIMO-NOMA, a receive beamformer is constructed at the cell-edge UEs to align the interfering channels, and then a transmit beamformer based on the null space at the BS is designed to ensure zero inter-cell and inter-cluster interference. For the cell-center UEs, a ZF decoder is designed to cancel the inter-cluster interference only. To ensure a fair comparison, it is additionally assumed that the cell-center UEs do not experience inter-cell interference as they are far away from the neighboring cell in practice. The two different settings of \(P^{\max}\) = (15 dBm, 30 dBm), according to 3GPP TR 36.942 v.9.0.1 with a 46-dBm maximum transmit power for the 20 MHz bandwidth are under consideration. Fig. [\[fig:CDFMIMO\]](#fig:CDFMIMO){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CDFMIMO"} plots the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the sum throughput. As expected, MIMO-NOMA outperforms both ICA-CoMP MIMO-NOMA and SA MIMO-NOMA. Specifically, by controlling the interference to the cell-edge UEs more efficiently, MIMO-NOMA reaches 1.5 bps/Hz and 5.9 bps/Hz higher than the ICA-CoMP MIMO-NOMA and SA MIMO-NOMA, respectively, in about \(60\%\) of the simulated trials with \(P^{\max}\) = 15 dBm (see Fig. [\[fig:CDFMIMO\]](#fig:CDFMIMO){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CDFMIMO"}(a)). With \(P^{\max}\) = 30 dBm, it is even more essential (see Fig. [\[fig:CDFMIMO\]](#fig:CDFMIMO){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CDFMIMO"}(b)).
## Numerical Results for MISO-NOMA
The performance of MISO-NOMA achieved by [\[beam1\]](#beam1){reference-type="eqref" reference="beam1"} is compared to that achieved by the two-stage beamforming in. The key idea of the two-stage beamforming is that ZF beamforming is employed at the BS first to cancel the inter-pair interference and then SIC is used for each pair of UEs. The optimal solution for two-stage beamforming can be easily found by using Algorithm [\[alg_Tailored_FW\]](#alg_Tailored_FW){reference-type="ref" reference="alg_Tailored_FW"}. Fig. [\[fig:SRMMISO:N\]](#fig:SRMMISO:N){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRMMISO:N"} plots the total sum throughput vs. the number of transmit antennas at the BS under setting \(N=3\), \(K=2\) and \(P^{\max} = 30\) dBm. Note that two-stage beamforming requires \(N_t\geq 2(K-1) + 2=4\). Unsurprisingly, MISO-NOMA achieves a better sum throughput than the two-stage beamforming. Two-stage beamforming achieves closer performance to MISO-NOMA as the number \(N_t\) of transmit antennas increases, providing more degrees of freedom to leverage multi-user diversity. Fig. [\[fig:SRMMISO:CDF\]](#fig:SRMMISO:CDF){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRMMISO:CDF"} plots the CDF of the sum throughput at \(N_t = 6\). The performance gap is narrower at a higher power budget.
## Comparison for Different Cluster Sizes
As the last numerical example, we investigate the system performance in a single-cell scenario of more than two UEs grouped to create a virtual cluster for NOMA. There are 6 UEs in total, which are randomly placed in three different areas, as shown by Fig. [\[fig:SRM3UE\]](#fig:SRM3UE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRM3UE"}(a). Two cell-center UEs are located inside the disc of radius \(r_n\) = 100 m, two cell-middle UEs are located inside the ring of inner radius \(100\) m and outer radius \(250\) m, and two cell-edge UEs are located inside the ring of inner radius \(250\) m and outer radius \(500\) m. Different cluster sizes are considered: two UEs per cluster, three UEs per cluster, and six UEs per cluster. For two-UE-per-cluster, a cell-center UE is randomly paired with a cell-middle UE, while the other is randomly paired with a cell-edge UE. The unpaired cell-middle UE and cell-edge are then paired to create the third cluster. There are two scenarios in grouping for three-UE-per-cluster.
- scenario-1 (*more distinct channel conditions*): each cluster consists of a cell-center UE, a cell-middle UE and a cell-edge UE;
- scenario-2 (*less distinct channel conditions*): each cluster consists of a cell-center UE.
The order of decoding messages for UEs in the same cluster of size three is as follows: the message for a cell-edge UE is decoded by all UEs, the message for a cell-middle UE is decoded by itself and the third UE by canceling the previously decoded message for the cell-edge UE from the intra-cluster, and the message for the third UE is decoded by itself only by canceling all previously decoded messages from the intra-cluster interference. Analogously, the messages for UEs \((1,1)\), \((1,2)\), \((1,3)\), \((1,4)\), \((1,5)\) and \((1,6)\) are successively decoded and canceled from the intra-cell interference in the case of six-UE-per-cluster, i.e. all UEs of the same cell have NOMA. The proposed algorithms are easily adapted for solution of the corresponding sum throughput maximization problems. Fig. [\[fig:SRM3UE\]](#fig:SRM3UE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRM3UE"}(b) and Fig. [\[fig:SRM3UE\]](#fig:SRM3UE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRM3UE"}(c) plot the sum throughput achieved by different clustering versus throughput threshold for MIMO-NOMA and MISO-NOMA under setting \(N_t = 12\) and \(P^{\max} = 30\) dBm. In general, the sum throughput achieved by the three-UE-per-cluster and six-UE-per-cluster based schemes are dropped less than that achieved by two-UE-per-cluster based one when the threshold \(\bar{\mathsf{R}}\) raises. Specifically, in Fig. [\[fig:SRM3UE\]](#fig:SRM3UE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRM3UE"}(b), the sum throughput of the three-UE scenario 2 and six-UE are worse than the two-UE for \(\bar{\mathsf{R}} < 2.4\) bps/Hz and vice versa. The BS will allocate a much higher transmit power to the UE of the worst channel condition in the three-UE and six-UE schemes than in the two-UE scheme to meet the QoS constraints. In other words, the cell-edge UEs' throughput is significantly improved in larger cluster sizes. Notably, the sum throughput by three-UE scenario 1 catches up that by DPC for larger \(\bar{\mathsf{R}}\) in both Fig. [\[fig:SRM3UE\]](#fig:SRM3UE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRM3UE"}(b) and Fig. [\[fig:SRM3UE\]](#fig:SRM3UE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SRM3UE"}(c). In addition, six-UE scheme cannot provide a good sum throughput since large UEs per cluster may have error propagation in SIC leading to drastically reduce NOMA performance. Another interesting observation is that the sum throughput of the three-UE scenario 1 outperforms that of the other schemes. Recalling that NOMA is more efficient by exploiting their channel condition differences, i.e. 3-UE scenario 1 with more distinct channel conditions. Consequently, a larger cluster size is recommended for more distinct channel conditions while a smaller cluster size is recommended for less distinct channel conditions.
# Conclusions {#sec:conclusion}
We have addressed the problem of sum throughput maximization in NOMA based systems by proposing new path-following optimization algorithms. Numerical examples with realistic parameters have confirmed their fast convergence to an optimal solution. They reveal that NOMA not only helps increase the cell-edge UEs' throughput substantially but also achieves much higher total sum throughput. The appropriate size of UE cluster with more distinctive channel gains has also been shown to achieve remarkable gains in NOMA systems.
# Appendix A: Proof for inequality ([\[in1\]](#in1){reference-type="ref" reference="in1"}) {#appendix-a-proof-for-inequality-in1 .unnumbered}
By
for all \(\alpha\geq 0\), \(\beta\geq 0\), \(\alpha+\beta=1\) and \(\mathbf{V}_1\), \(\mathbf{V}_2\), \(\mathbf{X}_1\succ \mathbf{0}\), \(\mathbf{X}_2\succ \mathbf{0}\). This means for all \(\mathbf{x}\), function
is convex. Then, for all \(\mathbf{V}\), \(\bar{\mathbf{V}}\), \(\mathbf{X}\succ \mathbf{0}\), \(\bar{\mathbf{X}}\succ \mathbf{0}\) it is true that
i.e.
proving ([\[in1\]](#in1){reference-type="ref" reference="in1"}).
# Appendix B: Proof for inequality ([\[in2\]](#in2){reference-type="ref" reference="in2"}) {#appendix-b-proof-for-inequality-in2 .unnumbered}
Since function \(\ln|\mathbf{X}|\) is concave on \(\mathbf{X}\succ \mathbf{0}\), it is true that
or equivalently
Then ([\[in2\]](#in2){reference-type="ref" reference="in2"}) follows by substituting \(\mathbf{X}=\mathbf{A}^{-1}\) and \(\bar{\mathbf{X}}=\mathbf{B}^{-1}\) into [\[proof28\]](#proof28){reference-type="eqref" reference="proof28"}.
# Appendix C: Proof for inequality ([\[zf8\]](#zf8){reference-type="ref" reference="zf8"}) {#appendix-c-proof-for-inequality-zf8 .unnumbered}
By function \(\ln (1+x^{-1})\) is convex on \(x>0\) so for all \(x>0\) and \(\bar{x}>0\), it is true that \[\label{proof61} \ln\bigl(1+x^{-1}\bigl) \geq \ln \bigl(1+\bar{x}^{-1}\bigl) + \bigl[(1+\bar{x})^{-1}-\bar{x}^{-1}\bigr](x-\bar{x}).\] Inequality ([\[zf8\]](#zf8){reference-type="ref" reference="zf8"}) then follows by substituting \(z=x^{-1}\) and \(\bar{z}=\bar{x}^{-1}\) into [\[proof61\]](#proof61){reference-type="eqref" reference="proof61"}.
[^1]: Using more sophisticated user-pairing strategies may improve the performance of MIMO-NOMA networks (see e.g. ) but it is beyond the scope of this paper. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:06:28', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01741', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01741'} |
# Introduction
Nematic liquid crystal phases are states of matter that possess long-range orientational order but are translationally invariant. Historically, they were discovered in systems of rod-like molecules with a \(D_{\infty h}\) symmetry and had a revolutionary impact on the display industry. However, it is generally accepted that the classification of nematic phases coincides with three-dimensional (\(3D\)) point groups. Since the early \(1970\)s there have been steady and tremendous efforts in the search for new nematic phases beyond uniaxial order. Indeed, \(D_{2h}\) biaxial nematics were proposed and their properties were discussed just shortly after theories of the uniaxial ones were established. There is now strong evidence of their existence and they are believed to be promising candidates for the next generation of liquid crystal displays (LCDs). Another remarkable example of unconventional nematic phases whose existence has been established is the twist-bent liquid crystals formed from bent-core constituents with \(C_{2v}\) symmetry. They exhibit intriguing optical and elastic properties and rich transition sequences, and are still subject to present studies. Moreover, there is also great interest in more complex polyhedral nematic phases classified by polyhedral groups. Attention has been focused on the search for those phases experimentally in various chemical and colloidal systems and numerically from packing shapes, classifying the associated order parameter tensors and topological defects, constructing theories supporting such orders and investigating their phase diagrams, and examining the consequential macroscopic properties. Nevertheless, in spite of considerable progress, we may have unveiled only a small corner of the rich landscape of the polyhedral phases. There are still many open questions on, e.g., their transition sequences and the nature of those phase transitions, the interactions of the associated topological defects and their influence on the thermodynamical, optical and mechanical properties of the system. From a theoretical point of view, the difficulty is closely tied to the complexity of those symmetries and their subgroup structure. These demand tensor order parameters of high rank and lead to rich patterns of phase transitions where dynamics of topological defects also plays a crucial role. Traditional Landau schemes and the associated lattice models are explicitly based on order parameters, and, hence, may become extremely involved and difficult to handle when dealing with complicated symmetries. They are also not convenient in accessing topological defects. Furthermore, the full classification of the explicit form of those order parameter tensors has been attained only recently. However, lattice gauge theory, adopted from high-energy physics, has opened up new avenues to address these issues. The application of this method to nematic orders dates back to the seminal works of Lammert, Rokshar, and Toner in the mid-\(1990\)s. The authors utilized a \(Z_2\) gauge theory to promote Heisenberg vectors to directors, and formulated their model in terms of vectors and \(Z_2\) gauge fields, instead of \(Q_{ab}\) tensors. They successfully capture the important statistical physics of uniaxial nematics, especially the first-order nematic-isotropic (NI) transition, and show the power of lattice gauge theory in controlling dynamics of topological defeccts. Variants of the Lammert-Rokshar-Toner model have also been applied to strongly correlated electron systems, for instance, in studies of charge fractionalization of superconductors and spin nematics. The works mentioned above have focussed exclusively on \(Z_2\) symmetries and uniaxial orders. Only recently has the gauge-theoretical description been extended to accommodate general point-group symmetries, in the studies of \(2+1 d\) quantum melting and \(3D\) thermal nematics by ourselves and collaborators. Its advantages have been proven both mathematically and practically, especially when dealing with \(3D\) point groups which are in general non-Abelian. First of all, it has been shown in solid mathematical terms that the gauge model fits all nematic orders into a uniform and efficient framework, regardless of their symmetry. This is in stark contrast to traditional order-parameter methods which are typically specific only for a single symmetry and often suffer from the complexity arising from high-rank ordering tensors. Moreover, the formulation of the gauge model requires no prior knowledge of the underlying order parameter which is an essential input for traditional methods. Instead, it acts as a machinery and generates a full classification of nematic ordering tensors which, to our knowledge, has never been done before, though remarkable results of a more narrow scope have been obtained previously by other means. Furthermore, in virtue of its generality, the gauge-theoretical method can also provide a global view over symmetries, which allows us to explore universal properties of different nematic orders. These include the insight of a relation between thermal fluctuations and symmetries, and the finding of a vestigial chiral phase that is reminiscent the chiral liquid reported in a recent experiment. Last but not least, the gauge model is also naturally compatible with anisotropic interactions. By allowing anisotropy, it has mathematically predicted and numerically verified rich patterns of biaxial-uniaxial transitions and new types of biaxial-biaxial\(^{\star}\) transitions , enriching our understanding of biaxial orders. In earlier works, we have focused on building the connection between generalized \(3D\) nematics and non-Abelian gauge theories, and on exploring the topology of their phase diagrams. In the present paper we study the nature of the NI transition for polyhedral orders by means of Monte Carlo simulations and a renormalization group analysis. This is not only important for physical properties of the system near the phase transition, but also relates to a fundamental question in statistical physics. That is, whether breaking \(O(3)\) in different manners can give rise to new universality classes. Moreover, it is worth pointing out that the gauge-theory model allows us to easily exclude irrelevant symmetries and focus on the most important degrees of freedom. Meanwhile, the model remains flexible enough to incorporate competing orders and disorders. The symmetries we are interested in are the \(7\) polyhedral subgroups of \(O(3)\), \(\{T, T_d, T_h, O, O_h, I, I_h\}\), requiring orientational tensors of rank higher than \(2\). Nematic phases of these symmetries are sometimes dubbed as octupolar or tetrahedral (\(T_d\)), cubic (\(O, O_h\)) or icosahedral (\(I, I_h\)) phases in literature. However, for convenience we will refer to them as generalized nematic phases when discussing general symmetries and \(G-\)nematics when discussing a specific instance of the symmetry \(G\). This convention was by no means invented by us, but already used in the textbook Ref. . These polyhedral nematic phases have not been clearly identified in experiments. Nevertheless, this does not mean that they are only of academical interest. Indeed, modern technologies in nano and colloid science are able to synthesize and manipulate mesoscopic particles with the desired symmetry to a high degree, hence providing essential building blocks for the realization of polyhedral phases. Moreover, it is also worth noting that these phases may emerge from systems of lower-symmetry constituents with suitable interactions or geometrical constraints, such as the proposed tetrahedral \(T_d\) phase from \(C_{2v}\)-shaped molecules and the cubic \(O_h\) phase from \(D_{\infty h}\)-components. This paper is organized as follows. In Section [2](#sec:model){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:model"}, we define the necessary degrees of freedom, and review the realization of generalized nematics in the language of lattice gauge theories. Section [3](#sec:results){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:results"} is devoted to Monte Carlo simulations. We first discuss the results of the chiral tetrahedral \(T\) nematics in detail, then present those for other polyhedral symmetries with a discussion on their general features. We compare our results with those from a renormalization scenario and other lattice models in Section [4](#sec:other_methods){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:other_methods"}. Finally, we conclude and provide an outlook in Section [5](#sec:done){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:done"}.
# Gauge-theory description of nematic phases {#sec:model}
## Degrees of freedom {#subsec:dof}
Instead of directly using physical order parameters, the fundamental degrees of freedom are nonphysical matter fields and gauge fields in the gauge theoretical description. The matter fields are \(O(3)\) rotors describing all possible rotations in \(3D\) real space. They can be parameterized by local orthonormal triads as \[R = (\mb{l}, \mb{m}, \mb{n} )^{\mr{T}} \in O(3),\] where \(\mb{n}^{\alpha} = \{\mb{l}, \mb{m}, \mb{n}\}\) with \(\alpha = 1, 2, 3\) are the three axes of a local triad. In concrete terms, they are defined by rotations that let \(R\) coincide with the fixed "laboratory" axes \(\mb{e}^{a} = \{\mb{e}_1, \mb{e}_2, \mb{e}_3 )\), and are parametrized by three Euler angles with respect to \(\mb{e}^{a}\). The three axes of \(R\) satisfy the relation \[\sigma = \mr{det}(R) = \mb{l} \cdot (\mb{m} \times \mb{n}) = \pm 1. \label{eq:handedness}\] This also defines the chirality or handedness, denoted by a pseudo-scalar \(\sigma\), of the triad. For \(\sigma = 1\), \(R\) describes rotations in \(SO(3)\) and is usually referred to as a proper rotation. For convenience later on, we also define triads formed by pseudo-vectors \(\tmb{n}^{\alpha} = \{\tmb{l}, \tmb{m}, \tmb{n}\}\), \[\widetilde{R} = (\tmb{l}, \tmb{m}, \tmb{n} )^{\mr{T}} \in SO(3), \label{SO3_triad}\] with \(\tmb{l} \cdot (\tmb{m} \times \tmb{n}) \equiv 1\), describing rotations of a rigid body. Correspondingly, a rotation in \(O(3)\) can be decomposed as \[R = \sigma \widetilde{R}.\] The gauge fields are defined as a connection between two neighboring triads. They are also rotations, but in contrast to the global \(O(3)\) rotations, they describe local rotations with respect to the axes of a triad. The introduction of gauge fields makes it is possible to compare two triads locally at different locations. The symmetry of the gauge fields is a point group by construction. In the simplest situation, when homogenous distributions of order parameters are preferred, it coincides with the symmetry of the "mesogens" of a liquid crystal. In terms of the terminology of Ref. , this symmetry is chosen to be the symmetry of the effective building blocks of the system, and can in turn represent the symmetry of the state in the fully symmetry-broken phase. In other words, the scheme works at a coarse-grained level by construction.
## The model {#subsec:model}
Having established the necessary information on the degrees of freedom, we now introduce the gauge-theoretic model. It is defined on an auxiliary cubic lattice, which is permitted by the continuous translational symmetry of nematic liquid crystals. It hence applies to both continuous and discrete point groups. The Hamiltonian takes the following form, \[H =-\sum_{\corr{i,j}} \mr{Tr}(R_i^{\mr{T}} \mathbb{J} U_{ij} R_j). \label{eq:model}\] \(R_i\) is the \(O(3)\) triad at a lattice site \(i\), \(U_{ij}\) is the gauge field of a point-group symmetry \(G\) mediating the interaction between two nearest-neighboring sites and lives on the link \(\corr{i,j}\). \(\mathbb{J}\) is a coupling matrix and can act as a tuning parameter. It is constrained by the symmetry of nematic mesogens, *i.e.* the gauge symmetry \(G\), in such a way that it has to be invariant under the transformation \(\Lambda \mathbb{J} \Lambda^{\mr{T}} = \mathbb{J}\), \(\forall \Lambda \in G\). It follows that \(\mathbb{J}\) is isotropic and takes the form \(\mathbb{J} = J \mathbbm{1}\) for all polyhedral groups, where \(J\) is positive for ferromagnetic (alignment) coupling. However, anisotropies of \(\mbb{J}\) are possible for nematics with axial symmetries, and are responsible to the generalized biaxial-uniaxial and biaxial-biaxial\(^{\star}\) transitions. The Hamiltonian Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} is invariant under gauge transformations \[R_i \rightarrow \Lambda_i R_i,\quad U_{ij} \rightarrow \Lambda_i U_{ij} \Lambda_j^{\mr{T}},\quad \forall \Lambda_i \in G. \label{eq:gauge_trans}\] This invariance identifies the orientation of a triad defined by \(R_i\) with that defined by \(\Lambda_i R_{i}\), and thus encodes the symmetry of the mesogens under consideration. To be more concrete, we define a local triad \(n^{\prime \beta}_i = U^{\beta\gamma}_{ij} n^{\gamma}_j\) at a site \(i\), and rewrite the Hamiltonian Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} in the following form, \[H =-\sum_{\corr{i,j}} J^{\alpha\beta} n^{\alpha}_i \cdot n^{\prime \beta}_j\label{eq:triad_form},\] where Greek letters in superscripts are associated with the axes of local triads, and \(J^{\alpha\beta} = J \delta_{\alpha, \beta}\) for polyhedral symmetries. By doing so, the triad \(n^{\gamma}_j\) has been brought to the same local gauge, namely the same body-fixed coordinate, as the site \(i\) by parallel transporting so that the orientation of the two triads can be compared. Then, considering the gauge transformations in Eq. [\[eq:gauge_trans\]](#eq:gauge_trans){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:gauge_trans"} running over \(G\) at a site \(j\), but letting other sites unchanged, \(\Lambda_{i \neq j} \equiv \mathbbm{1}\), this generates a set of \(n^{\prime \beta}_j\) which consists of all the equivalent definitions of the orientation of the underlying mesogen of the symmetry \(G\) at the site \(j\). Let us take a chiral cube with the symmetry \(O\) as an example. The orientation of the cube maps to \(24\) configurations of a local triad, corresponding to the \(24\) transformations of the group \(O\). When all these configurations are considered and identified, we are effectively describing the orientation of a cube via that of a set of local triads. The symmetry of the underlying mesogens is thus realized by the gauge symmetry. Note that the choice of \(\Lambda_{i \neq j} \equiv \mathbbm{1}\) in the above example is purely for simplifying the example. Gauge transformations Eq. [\[eq:gauge_trans\]](#eq:gauge_trans){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:gauge_trans"} can be performed independently to all the sites. Consequently, in the low-energy limit, the orientational interaction of physical mesogens (order parameter fields) is hence effectively encoded in the gauge model Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} of nonphysical degrees of freedom, as depicted by Fig. [\[fig:lattice\]](#fig:lattice){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:lattice"}. This procedure can also be shown in explicit mathematical terms by integrating out the gauge fields Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"}, and we refer to our earlier publications Refs. and for detailed proofs. However, though maybe less intuitive, it is advantageous to work with gauge degrees of freedom. As the symmetry of the order parameter fields is directly implemented by the gauge symmetry, the gauge model applies to all point group symmetries by simply choosing a desired \(G\).
## Discussion on the phases
It is well known that gauge symmetries cannot break spontaneously. As a consequence, the fully symmetry-broken phase of the gauge model, Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"}, features a ground state manifold \(O(3)/G\) which is just the order-parameter manifold of a \(G-\)nematic phase. This phase is usually referred to as the Higgs phase in the language of gauge theories, and corresponds to the aligned state of mesogens in the current context, i.e., a nematic phase of the symmetry \(G\). On the other hand, the disordered \(O(3)\) liquid phase is realized by the confinement phase of the gauge model Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"}. There are three comments to be made on the above statements to avoid confusion. First, the Higgs phase just mentioned corresponds to a situation where \(O(3)\) has been completely broken to the local symmetry \(G\). However, aside from this, there can also be an intermediate Higgs phase that breaks \(O(3)\) to a larger point group \(G^{\prime}\) satisfying \(G \subset G^{\prime} \subset O(3)\), featuring vestigial order. This could happen when fluctuations in some sectors of the degrees of freedom are more pronounced than in others. For instance, in case \(G\) is a finite axial group, the fully ordered Higgs phase is a biaxial nematic phase of the symmetry \(G\). When fluctuations in the plane perpendicular to the so-called primary axis are sufficiently strong or weak, upon changing temperature, the system may experience an intermediate uniaxial and/or biaxial\(^{\star}\) phase, respectively, before entering the disordered isotropic liquid phase, as discussed in detail in Ref. . As another example, an intermediate Higgs phase may also appear as a chiral liquid phase. Possible realizations of this phase are systems formed from mesogens of a chiral polyhedral symmetry, \(G \in \{T, O, I\}\). For these symmetries, fluctuations in orientations are much more pronounced than those in the chirality. Thus a phase that breaks real-space inversion and mirror symmetry but is invariant under \(SO(3)\) rotations can emerge between the nematic phase and the \(O(3)\) liquid phase. We will encounter this situation again in the next section and a systematic and detailed discussion can be found in Ref. . Second, the distinction between the Higgs phase and the confinement phase is only a property when \(G\) is a nontrivial subgroup of \(O(3)\). In the limit \(G = O(3)\), these two phases are continuously connected and indistinguishable, consistent with the fact that there is no symmetry breaking for \(O(3)/O(3)\). Last but no least, as mentioned earlier, we will focus on homogeneous distributions of order parameter fields, as is realized by the gauge model Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"}. However, inhomogeneous distributions may also lead to interesting phenomena. One example is the chiral-\(T\) phase with a helical structure of \(T_d\) molecules, owing to an explicit chiral elastic term in Landau free energy, as discussed in Ref. . We can also introduce a gauge invariant chiral term to Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} to incorporate such helical structure for general symmetries, but will leave it for future study. What is relevant to the current paper is that, as such a chiral term is independent to the additional quartic terms of high rank tensors, it is unlikely that they can change the nature of fluctuation-induced first-order phase transitions for the \(T\) and \(T_d\) symmetry which will be discussed in Sec. [4.1](#subsec:MF_FG){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:MF_FG"}.
## Topological defects
Before closing the section, let us briefly comment on the dynamics of gauge fields in the model Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} and its relation to topological defects of liquid crystals. From the point of view of gauge theories, the model Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} consists of a single Higgs term, in which form the dynamics of gauge fields \(U_{ij}\) arises purely from the interaction with the matter fields \(R_i\). In general, however, the gauge fields can have their own dynamics, which in the simplest case is described by a plaquette term in the following form, \[H_{\mr{YM}} =-\sum_{\square} K_{C_{\mu}} (U_{\square}) \mr{Tr}[U_{\square}]. \label{eq:K_term}\] This generalizes the defect suppression term in Refs. , and essentially is an analog of the Yang-Mills theory as the \(U_{ij}\)'s are in general non-Abelian. However, comparing to usual lattice Yang-Mills theories in high energy physics, here we are interested in discrete symmetries. \(U_{\square} \in G\) denotes the orientated product of the gauge fields around a minimal plaquette of the lattice, \(U_{\square} = \prod_{\corr{ij} \in \square} U_{ij}\). A plaquette of \(U_{\square} \neq \mathbbm{1}\) is frustrated and represents a gauge flux. The coupling strength \(K_{C_{\mu}}\) depends on the trace of \(U_{\square}\), so it is a function of the conjugation class \(C_{\mu}\) of \(G\), which means that gauge fluxes in the same conjugation class are physically equivalent. A gauge flux has the effect that after a triad travels around it in a closed circuit, the triad is rotated by \(U_{\square}\), just like circling a disclination. Furthermore, the classification of gauge fluxes coincides with the Volterra classification of disclinations. Even though this classification, as well as the Volterra classification, is in general not identical to the homotopy classification of topologically stable defects, it includes all the elementary topologically stable defects and can be used to construct the full homotopy classification. As we can easily tune \(K_{C_{\mu}}\) to suppress or prompt certain types of defects, the interaction in \(H_{\mr{YM}}\) provides a possible route to study the influence of topological defects on thermodynamical properties of nematic liquid crystals. As is known from the study of lattice gauge theory, this may qualitatively change both the topology of the phase diagrams and the nature of underlying phase transitions. Refs. also showed remarkable examples in this context, where the first-order uniaxial-isotropic transition is split into two continuous ones when the defect suppression is sufficiently large. For general symmetries, we expect rich physics to explore when treating the elastic term [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} and non-Abelian defect term [\[eq:K_term\]](#eq:K_term){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:K_term"} at equal footing. Nevertheless, this is beyond the scope of the current paper, and deserves a separate systematic study. Thus, for simplicity, we will set \(K_{C_{\mu}} \equiv 0\) and focus on Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} in the following. Physically, this means none of the topological defects are assigned a particular core energy.
# Numerical results {#sec:results}
As discussed in the last section, the gauge model Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} can act as an efficient and flexible framework for studying nematic order with arbitrary point-group symmetries. Moreover, it is readily accessible by Monte Carlo simulations. In light of this, we examined the nature of the nematic-isotropic transition for all \(3D\) polyhedral groups, *i.e.*, \(\{T, T_d, T_h, O, O_h, I, I_h\}\). For the convenience of the reader, generators of these symmetries are provided in Tables [1](#table:groups){reference-type="ref" reference="table:groups"} and [2](#table:generators){reference-type="ref" reference="table:generators"}, while more information can be found in textbooks, e.g., Refs. and . Schönflies notation is used thorough out the manuscript. We use the Metropolis algorithm and run simulations on cubic lattices with volume \(V = 8^3, 16^3, 24^3\). The simulations include three steps. In the first step, the transition temperatures are located as precise as possible by examining the peak position of the heat capacity and the nematic susceptibility (see below). Procedures of cooling random initial states and heating uniform states are compared. In the next step, we perform extensive simulations near the transition, histogramming the distribution of the observables of interest. The typical amount of *independent* samples used are of the order of \(10^5\) to \(10^7\). In the last step, the histograms are further improved by Ferrenberg-Swendsen reweighting, and the transition temperatures are estimated from the shape of the histograms. In the rest of the section, we first present the results for tetrahedral \(T\) nematics and discuss the general features of this phase transition in detail. Then we discuss other symmetries.
## \(SO(3)/T\) transition {#subsec:SO3_T}
The tetrahedral group \(T\) consists of \(12\) proper rotations leaving a tetrahedron invariant. Therefore, aside from the orientational order, a \(T\)-symmetric nematic phase also takes an intrinsic chiral order, breaks inversion and any kinds of mirror symmetries of real space. Note that the \(T\)-nematic phase we discuss here is different from the \(T\)-phase discussed by Fel in Ref. . In the later case the \(T\) symmetry arises from the helical structure of \(T_d\)-symmetric mesogens and is associated with a different order parameter (see below and also Sec. [4.1](#subsec:MF_FG){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:MF_FG"} for further discussion). It turns out that for nematics formed from constituents with a \(T\)-symmetry and a flexible handedness, as well as from those with an \(O\)-or \(I\)-symmetry, fluctuations in the orientation sector are in general much more pronounced than those in the chirality sector. Consequently, the system develops orientational order and chiral order sequentially. Furthermore, by comparing numerical results with a mean-field analysis, it is shown that the two phase transitions are well separated. This implies that the relevant degrees of freedom associated with the NI transition lie in the \(SO(3)\) sector in Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"}. In mathematical terms, we can rewrite the gauge model Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} as \[H =-J \sum_{\corr{i,j}} \sigma_i \sigma_j \mr{Tr}(\widetilde{R}_i^{\mr{T}} U_{ij} \widetilde{R}_j),\] by taking out the \(Z_2\) center of \(O(3)\), where \(\sigma_i\) denotes the handedness fields and \(\widetilde{R}_i\) are \(SO(3)\) triads, defined in Eq. [\[eq:handedness\]](#eq:handedness){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:handedness"} and Eq. [\[SO3_triad\]](#SO3_triad){reference-type="eqref" reference="SO3_triad"}. The handedness fields are frozen during the NI transition, thus simplifying the problem to a phase transition breaking \(SO(3)\), governed by a Hamiltonian \[H^{\prime} =-J \sum_{\corr{i,j}} \mr{Tr}(\widetilde{R}_i^{\mr{T}} U_{ij} \widetilde{R}_j). \label{eq:SO3}\] The orientational order parameter of \(T\)-nematic phases is a rank-\(3\) tensor taking the following form (note the difference to the \(T_d\) order parameter, see Sec. [4.1](#subsec:MF_FG){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:MF_FG"}), \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:op_T} \overline{\mbb{O}}^{T} &= \corr{\mbb{O}^{T}_i}_V \nonumber \\ &= \sum_{\mr{cyc}}\corr{\tmb{l} \otimes \tmb{m} \otimes \tmb{n}-\frac{1}{6}\varepsilon_{abc} \tmb{e}_a \otimes \tmb{e}_b \otimes \tmb{e}_c }_V, \end{aligned}\] where \(\mbb{O}^{T}_i\) denotes the local ordering tensor at a coarse-grained lattice site \(i\), \(\corr{...}_V\) denotes the average over the volume, and \(\sum_{\mr{cyc}}\) is the sum running over cyclic permutations of local axes \(\{\tmb{l}, \tmb{m}, \tmb{n}\}\). The Levi-Civita tensor is introduced to make the ordering tensor traceless, so \(\overline{\mbb{O}}^{T}\) becomes a zero tensor in the liquid phase. This term is only needed when working with \(SO(3)\) triads where the handedness of each local triad is fixed. If the handedness is allowed to fluctuate (*i.e*, the case of an \(O(3)\) triad) summing over the two kinds of chirality cancels this term. In case of homogenous distributions, instead of using the tensor form Eq. [\[eq:op_T\]](#eq:op_T){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:op_T"}, we can characterize a nematic order of symmetry \(G\) by its magnitude defined as \[q = \sqrt{\mr{Tr}(\mbb{O}^G \cdot \mbb{O}^G)}.\] This quantity is called the *nematicity* and generalizes the concept of magnetization. Consequently, we can further define the susceptibility of \(q\) in the standard way, \[\chi_{q} = \beta V \left( \corr{q^2}-\corr{q}^2 \right),\] and detect the NI transition by the peak of \(\chi_{q}\), where \(\beta\) is the inverse temperature. As confirmed in our simulations, the peak of \(\chi_{q}\) coincides with that of the heat capacity defined in the standard way, indicating that the nematicity \(q\) is indeed a valid scalar order parameter. We have measured the \(SO(3)/T\) NI transition with Eq. [\[eq:SO3\]](#eq:SO3){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:SO3"} by monitoring several quantities, including the energy, the nematicity, histograms of the two, the heat capacity and the susceptibility. As many of them reveal the same information, we present only those which are necessary for the following discussions. In Fig. [\[fig:Nematicity\]](#fig:Nematicity){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Nematicity"}, we show the behavior of the nematicity for a broad range of temperatures, and Figs. [\[fig:Histo_E\_T\]](#fig:Histo_E_T){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Histo_E_T"} and [\[fig:Histo_Nem_T\]](#fig:Histo_Nem_T){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Histo_Nem_T"} show the histograms of the energy density and the nematicity at phase transition, \(P(E)\) and \(P(q)\), respectively. As shown in the energy histogram Fig. [\[fig:Histo_E\_T\]](#fig:Histo_E_T){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Histo_E_T"}, a double-peak behavior emerges at sufficiently large lattice sizes, and appears more pronounced when the lattice size increases, indicating the occurrence two stable, co-existing phases, which is a hallmark of a first-order phase transition. The distance between the valley and peak of a histogram, measuring the difficulty for the system to tunnel between two phases, also increases with the lattice size, as expected. The physical meaning of the two peaks is revealed by the nematicity histogram from the same simulations, shown in Fig. [\[fig:Histo_Nem_T\]](#fig:Histo_Nem_T){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Histo_Nem_T"}. With increasing lattice size, aside from the behavior that the peaks become more pronounced, the first peak notably moves to the left. We expect it eventually goes to zero in the thermodynamical limit, indicating a disordered liquid phase. The other peak corresponds to the nematic phase.
## Other symmetries {#subsec:others}
We performed the same procedure as in the case of the \(SO(3)/T\) NI transition for all other polyhedral symmetries, *i.e.*, symmetries of \(\{T_d, T_h, O, O_h, I, I_h\}\). Similar to the \(T\)-nematics, the breaking of chiral and of rotational symmetry in case of the cubic \(O\) and the icosahedral \(I\) symmetry are separated, owing to huge fluctuations in orientation. Thus, they are also simulated in terms of Eq. [\[eq:SO3\]](#eq:SO3){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:SO3"}, resulting in a \(SO(3)/O\) and a \(SO(3)/I\) transition, respectively. On the other hand, the nonchiral symmetries \(\{T_d, T_h, O_h, I_h\}\) are studied via the original model Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"}, corresponding to a direct breaking of \(O(3)\). We find first-order behavior for all these transitions. Fig. [\[fig:Histo_others\]](#fig:Histo_others){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Histo_others"} shows the energy histogram of symmetries \(\{T_h, T_d, O, I\}\). The results of the \(SO(3)/O\) and \(SO(3)/I\) transition also represent those of the \(O(3)/O_h\) and \(O(3)/I_h\) transition, which have very similar behavior as the former two, with slightly higher \(T_c\)'s. This may be understood by the fact that the \(Z_2\) center in the latter two cases can be factorized as a trivial \(Z_2/Z_2\) theory, leading to the same order parameter manifold as the \(SO(3)/O\) and \(SO(3)/I\) cases, respectively. Indeed, \(O\)-nematics and \(O_h\) nematics, as well as \(I\)-and \(I_h\)-nematics, share the same orientational order parameter, only distinguished by a pseudo-scalar chiral order parameter. We also studied the behavior of the nematicity and its histogram for these symmetries. Although the curves corresponding to different symmetries are well separated (since the phase transitions occur at different temperature scales) in Fig. [\[fig:Histo_others\]](#fig:Histo_others){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Histo_others"}, the histograms of the nematicities overlap closely for these symmetries, especially in the disorder region where all the disordering peaks are located at some small nematicity value close to \(0\). Moreover, they show very similar features as seen in Figs. [\[fig:Nematicity\]](#fig:Nematicity){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Nematicity"} and [\[fig:Histo_T\]](#fig:Histo_T){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Histo_T"} for the \(SO(3)/T\) transition case. They are therefore not presented. One notable feature of Fig. [\[fig:Histo_others\]](#fig:Histo_others){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Histo_others"} is that the peaks of the histogram shift to lower energy scales as symmetries increase (the energy density is normalized via \(E_G =-9V\) which is the energy when all mesogens uniformly align up), indicating a decrease in the corresponding transition temperatures. This can be understood as a consequence of more pronounced orientational fluctuations for high symmetries, which in turn results in an increasing difficulty to stabilize the order. Note that this feature is manifest when using a common metric, the Higgs coupling strength \(J\), for all the symmetries. This metric is not a direct physical measure in the sense that it describes the interaction strength between the auxiliary gauge fields and matter fields, rather than that of physical order parameter fields. Although the latter one depends in principle on the Higgs coupling, the derivation of the relation is in general nontrivial. Nevertheless, this does not prevent us to obtain general insights on the nature of the phase transitions. Clearly, Fig. [\[fig:Histo_others\]](#fig:Histo_others){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Histo_others"} reveals the generic first-order nature of the NI transition for all these symmetries. It is not clear yet how the strength of these first-order transitions depends on their respective symmetries. However, this depends on microscopic details of a system and a universal conclusion might not exist.
# Relations and comparisons to other methods {#sec:other_methods}
We have numerically reached the conclusion of a generic first order NI transition from a particular framework. Moreover, this is consistent with existing results from other methods, including a general perspective from mean field theories, renormalization group (RG) analyses and other lattice models, as we elaborate below.
## Mean-field theories and RG {#subsec:MF_FG}
A significant difference between nematic order and spin or vector order is that in general the former requires a tensor order parameter due to nontrivial internal symmetries. In case of the \(D_{\infty h}\) uniaxial nematics, the order parameter is a rank-\(2\) tensor, \(Q_{ab}\), which gives rise to a third order term, \(Q_{ab} Q_{bc} Q_{ca}\), in the Landau-de Gennes theory and makes the NI transition discontinuous. For polyhedral symmetries \(\{T_h, O, O_h, I, I_h\}\) the nematic order parameters are also even rank tensors, which take the following form for nonchiral groups \(\{T_h, O_h, I_h\}\), \[\begin{aligned}
\mathbb{O}^{T_h} &= \mathbf{l}^{\otimes 2} \otimes \mathbf{m}^{\otimes 2} + \mathbf{m}^{\otimes 2} \otimes \mathbf{n}^{\otimes 2} + \mathbf{n}^{\otimes 2} \otimes \mathbf{l}^{\otimes 2} \nonumber \\ & \quad-\frac{2}{5} \delta_{ab} \delta_{cd}\bigotimes_{\substack{ \mu = a,b,c, d}} \mathbf{e}_{\mu} + \frac{1}{10} \bigg( \delta_{ac} \delta_{bd} \bigotimes_{\substack{ \mu = a,c,b, d}} \mathbf{e}_{\mu} \nonumber \\ & \quad + \delta_{ad} \delta_{bc}\bigotimes_{\substack{ \mu = a,d,b, c}} \mathbf{e}_{\mu} \bigg), \label{eq:op_Th}\\ \mathbb{O}^{O_h} &= \mathbf{l}^{\otimes 4} + \mathbf{m}^{\otimes 4} + \mathbf{n}^{\otimes 4} -\frac{1}{5}\sum_{\text{pairs}} \delta_{ab} \delta_{cd} \bigotimes_{\substack{ \mu = a,b,c, d}} \mathbf{e}_{\mu}, \label{eq:op_Oh} \\ \mathbb{O}^{I_h} &= \sum_{\rm{cyc}} \bigg[ \mathbf{l}^{\otimes 6} +\sum_{ \{+,-\}} \Big(\frac{1}{2} \mathbf{l} \pm \frac{\tau}{2} \mathbf{m} \pm \frac{1}{2\tau} \mathbf{n} \Big)^{\otimes 6} \bigg] \nonumber \\ & \quad-\frac{1}{7} \sum_{\text{pairs}} \delta_{ab} \delta_{cd} \delta_{ef} \bigotimes_{\substack{ \mu = a,b,c, \\ d,e,f}} \mathbf{e}_{\mu}, \label{eq:op_Ih} \end{aligned}\] and \(\mathbb{O}^{O} = \{\mathbb{O}^{O_h}, \sigma\}\) and \(\mathbb{O}^{I} = \{\mathbb{O}^{I_h}, \sigma\}\) for chiral groups \(\{O, I\}\), where \(\sum_{\text{cyc}}\) runs over the cyclic permutations of \(\{\mb{l}, \mb{m}, \mb{n}\}\), \(\sum_{\text{pairs}}\) sums over all nonequivalent pairings of the indices of the Kronecker delta functions, and \(\otimes\) denotes the tensor product. Similar to the \(D_{\infty h}\) uniaxial case, even in naive mean-field theories for these symmetries, there are third order terms of the form \(\mbb{O}_{abcd} \mbb{O}_{cdef} \mbb{O}_{efab}\) or \(\mbb{O}_{abcdef} \mbb{O}_{defghk} \mbb{O}_{ghkabc}\), giving rise to a first order phase transition. On the other hand, the tetrahedral \(T_d\) order requires a rank-\(3\) order parameter tensor, \(\mbb{O}^{T_d}\), where \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:op_Td} \mathbb{O}^{T_d} = \sum_{\mathrm{cyc}} (\mathbf{l} \otimes \mathbf{m} + \mathbf{m} \otimes \mathbf{l})\otimes \mathbf{n}. \end{aligned}\] This forbids the appearance of the third order term in a naive mean-field theory which has the following free energy density, \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:MF_Td} f_{T_d} = \frac{1}{2} (\partial_i \mbb{O}^{T_d}_{abc} \partial_i \mbb{O}^{T_d}_{abc}) + \frac{r}{2} \mbb{O}^{T_d}_{abc} \mbb{O}^{T_d}_{abc} + u (\mbb{O}^{T_d}_{abc} \mbb{O}^{T_d}_{abc})^2, \end{aligned}\] and predicts a continuous NI transition, where \(r\) and \(u\) are phenomenological coefficients. A further RG study by Radzihovsky and Lubensky in Ref. shows that Eq. [\[eq:MF_Td\]](#eq:MF_Td){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:MF_Td"} has a second order phase transitions, falling into the \(O(7)\) universality class, as the symmetric traceless tensor \(\mbb{O}^{T_d}\) can be mapped to a \(7\) dimensional vector. However, this transition is unstable against fluctuations. Following the general symmetry principles there exists another fourth order term, \(\mbb{O}^{T_d}_{abc} \mbb{O}^{T_d}_{ade} \mbb{O}^{T_d}_{bdf} \mbb{O}^{T_d}_{cef}\), representing fluctuations, which qualitatively modifies the nature of the NI transition and makes it first order. The tetrahedral \(T\) order faces a similar situation as the \(T_d\) one. Its order parameter \(\mbb{O}^T\) defined in Eq. [\[eq:op_T\]](#eq:op_T){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:op_T"} is also an odd rank and symmetric traceless tensor (The kernel of \(\mbb{O}^T\) is not symmetric, but becomes so after carrying out the trace). Therefore, the paradigm of Ref. for the \(T_d\) case equally applies to the \(SO(3)/T\) transition, with a different tensor representation for the \(O(7)\) vector. Consequently, the second order NI transition predicted by the MF theory is converted to a first order one, agreeing with our results from the gauge model. With this new perspective, let us look back to the symmetries \(\{T_h, O, O_h, I, I_h\}\). Although the first-order nature of their NI transitions can already be concluded from a naive mean-field treatment, we should not omit other quartic couplings for completeness. \(\mbb{O}^{O_h}\) and \(\mbb{O}^{I_h}\) are also symmetric and traceless tensors, and lead to \(5\) and \(7\) quartic terms (the number of independent terms may be reduced by one), respectively. It is more tricky in the \(T_h\) case. \(\mbb{O}^{T_h}\) is only partially symmetric (it is only invariant under switching the first or the last two indices), hence even the second and the third order coupling are not unique. Of course not all of those couplings are necessary to appear in a particular system. However, this implies that it requires very precise fine tuning to promote the NI transition for polyhedral symmetries to second order.
## Other lattice models {#subsec:other_lattice}
Next we compare our results with those from other lattice models. Remarkable examples are Refs. and for the \(T_d\) and \(O_h\) order. (Other examples have been mainly focused on uniaxial and biaxial orders.) They are typically constructed by an interaction potential between two rigid molecules or mesogens of a certain symmetry. The orientation of a mesogen is described by \(M\) (nonorthogonal) unit vectors, spanned from a common local origin and organized in a way that explicitly has the desired symmetry. The potential, \(V_{ij}\), is then defined in terms of Legendre polynomials of the inner product of those vectors at the lowest nontrivial order, \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:pair_potential} V_{ij} &= V(\mb{v}^{(m)}_i, \mb{v}^{(m^{\prime})}_j) \nonumber \\ & \sim-c_l \sum^M_{m,m^{\prime} = 1} P_l(\mb{v}^{(m)}_i \cdot \mb{v}^{(m^{\prime})}_j), \end{aligned}\] where the coefficient \(c_l\) is positive for ferromagnetic coupling, \(P_l(...)\) denotes the Legendre polynomial at the order \(l\), and \(\mb{v}^{(m)}_i\) are local unit vectors at the lattice site \(i\). For the cubic \(O_h\) order, the \(\mb{v}^{(m)}_i\) coincide with our local triads \(\mb{n}^{\alpha}_i\), and the Legendre polynomials are trivial for \(l < 4\). On the other hand, in case of the tetrahedral \(T_d\) order, the \(\mb{v}^{(m)}_i\) are the \(4\) three-fold axes of a regular tetrahedron and are nonorthogonal, whereas the Legendre polynomials become nontrivial only from \(P_3\) onwards. Following the same principle and given the expression Eq. [\[eq:op_Ih\]](#eq:op_Ih){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:op_Ih"}, one expects that this requires \(15\) vectors, which are the \(2\)-fold axes of a regular icosahedron, and sixth order Legendre polynomials. It is not hard to show that the interaction potential Eq. [\[eq:pair_potential\]](#eq:pair_potential){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:pair_potential"} can be understood as a counterpart of the Lebwohl-Lasher model for general symmetries, and is equivalent to the inner product between two order parameter tensors, \[\label{eq:effective_potential} V_{ij} \sim \mr{Tr}(\mbb{O}^G_i \cdot \mbb{O}^G_j).\] As shown in Refs. , this is exactly the leading order of the effective Hamiltonian of the gauge model Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"} after tracing out the gauge fields. Therefore, it is not a surprise that our results of the \(T_d\) and \(O_h\) NI transition agree with those in Refs. , and the agreements to other polyhedral symmetries, \(\{T, T_h, O, I, I_h\}\), can also be expected. However, lattice models for these symmetries in the type of the potential Eq. [\[eq:pair_potential\]](#eq:pair_potential){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:pair_potential"} are yet to be developed to the best of our knowledge. Unlike the gauge model Eq. [\[eq:model\]](#eq:model){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:model"}, which can readily be applied for all point-group symmetries, the potential Eq. [\[eq:pair_potential\]](#eq:pair_potential){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:pair_potential"} is symmetry-dependent and involves large amounts of vectors and high-order Legendre polynomials, whose high complexity in actual use can be anticipated. For instance, in case of the \(I_h\) order, it involves \(225\) Legendre polynomials of order \(6\). However, the potential Eq. [\[eq:pair_potential\]](#eq:pair_potential){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:pair_potential"} has advantages in a more straightforward connection with microscopic interactions of liquid crystal mesogens, as it is built directly on physical order parameter fields. Moreover, it is interesting to see how this method applies to the \(T\) and \(T_h\) symmetries, where the role of mirrors may be manifest, as well as the relation and difference of the resultant lattice models to those of the \(T_d\) and \(O_h\) case, which are the symmetry they halve, respectively.
# Summary {#sec:done}
Rotational symmetry breaking is ubiquitous and plays an important role in condensed matter physics and statistical physics. One of its intriguing features is that there is a multitude of ways to break a symmetry into its subgroups, leading to a large array of exotic phases. In this work, we have examined the nature of phase transitions breaking the rotational group \(O(3)\) to polyhedral point groups. Such phases are prime candidates in the search for unconventional nematic liquid crystals, in particular in the field of nano and colloidal science. We found that the transitions from the nematic phase to the isotropic liquid phase are generically first order for all polyhedral symmetries. Furthermore, the polyhedral NI transitions are robust in the sense that they require fine tuning of a high precision in order to achieve a second order phase transition. This feature is inherited from the complexity of the group structure of polyhedral symmetries. Moreover, along the lines of the discussion in Sec. [4.1](#subsec:MF_FG){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:MF_FG"}, we anticipate the NI transition of generalized uni-and bi-axial nematics, which breaks \(O(3)\) to axial point groups \(\{C_n, C_{nv}, C_{nh}, S_{2n}, D_{n}, D_{nh}, D_{nd} \}\), to be generically of first order as well. As discussed in detail in Ref., the order parameter of axial symmetries in general has the structure \(\mbb{O}^G = \{\mbb{A}^G, \mbb{B}^G, \sigma\}\), where \(\mbb{A}^G = \mbb{A}^G[\mb{n}]\) defines the order of the primary axis chosen to be \(\mb{n}\), \(\mbb{B}^G = \mbb{B}^G[\mb{l}, \mb{m}]\) or \(\mbb{B}^G[\mb{l}, \mb{m}, \mb{n}]\) defines the order in the perpendicular plane and is required for finite axial symmetries, and \(\sigma\) defines the chiral order as seen in Sec. [3.1](#subsec:SO3_T){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:SO3_T"} and is only relevant for the proper axial groups \(\{C_n, D_n\}\). For symmetries \(\{ C_{nh}, S_{2n}, D_{n}, D_{nh}, D_{nd} \}\), \(\mbb{A}^G\) is a rank-two tensor and coincides with the \(Q_{ab}\) director. Hence, following the Landau-de Gennes theory, it is immediately clear that regardless of the in-plane structure, the NI transition for these symmetries will be generically first order. For symmetries \(C_n\) and \(C_{nv}\), the primary order parameter \(\mbb{A}^G\) is a vector, and continuous phase transitions seem to be preferred. However, when \(n > 1\) but finite, the direct NI transition will be also first order, owing to the existence of an even and/or high rank \(\mbb{B}^G\) tensor, as in the cases of polyhedral symmetries. Even at \(n = 1\), where both \(\mbb{A}\) and \(\mbb{B}\) are vectorial, the order of the phase transition will depend on their coupling. Therefore, even though there are diverse patterns to break the \(O(3)\) symmetry, second-order transitions and corresponding universality classes may be quite rare. The familiar Heisenberg universality class related to the breaking of \(O(3)\) to \(O(2) \cong C_{\infty v}\) is a special case. Our results add new insights to the physics of exotic orientational phases and hopefully facilitate the understanding of future experiments. Finally, we would like to note that in the present work only a single symmetry is considered in the realization of each polyhedral nematic. Nevertheless, as has been discussed by many authors for \(T_d\) and \(O_h\) symmetries, polyhedral phases may emerge from systems formed from less-symmetric constituents. Although it is hard to imagine a second-order NI transition from this, it would be interesting to explore the general pattern of symmetry emergence in liquid crystal systems. Given the compatibility with competing orders and the potential power on controlling topological defects, we expect that the gauge-theory scenario will be suitable to achieve this aim without losing simplicity. **Acknowledgments** We would like to thank Leo Radzihovsky and Henk Blöte for stimulating discussions, and Jaakko Nissinen for useful discussions and related collaborations. This work is supported by FP7/ERC starting grant No. 306897. Our simulations made use of the ALPSCore library. | {'timestamp': '2018-01-29T02:08:36', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01811', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01811'} |
# Introduction
Inverse relations play an important role in combinatorics. The *binomial inversion formula*, which states that for sequences \(\{a_n\}\) and \(\{b_n\}\) (\(n=0,1, 2, \ldots\)), \[\label{b1} a_n=\sum_{k=0}^{n} {n \choose k}(-1)^k b_k \;\;\;\mbox{\rm if and only if}\;\;\; b_n=\sum_{k=0}^{n} {n \choose k}(-1)^k a_k,\] is a typical inverse relation of interest in. Specifically, ([\[b1\]](#b1){reference-type="ref" reference="b1"}) motivated Sun to investigate the following sequences.
Several examples of invariant sequences of the first kind can be found in, including \[\{\frac{1}{2^n}\}, \; \{ nF_{n-1}\}, \; \{L_n\},\; \{(-1)^nB_n\} \;\; (n\geq 0),\] where \(F_{-1}=0\) and \(\{F_n\}\), \(\{L_n\}\), and \(\{B_n\}\) are the Fibonacci sequence, Lucas sequence, and Bernoulli numbers, respectively. In this paper, we will establish (see Lemma [\[bf2proof\]](#bf2proof){reference-type="ref" reference="bf2proof"}) the *modified binomial inversion formula* such that \[\label{b2} a_n=\sum_{k=n}^{\infty} {k \choose n}(-1)^k b_k \;\;\;\mbox{\rm if and only if}\;\;\; b_n=\sum_{k=n}^{\infty} {k \choose n}(-1)^k a_k.\] Motivated by ([\[b2\]](#b2){reference-type="ref" reference="b2"}), we will introduce and consider the following sequences.
Naturally arising are the questions of existence, identification, and construction of (inverse) invariant sequences of the second kind, as well as the problem of characterizing such sequences and examining their relationship to their counterparts of the first kind. Invariant sequences, which are also called self-inverse sequences in, have indeed been studied by several authors [@Choi; @Donaghey; @Sun; @Wang]. They are naturally connected to involutory (also known as involution or self-invertible) matrices and to Riordan involutions. Involutory matrices find use in numerical methods for differential equations. They are also useful in cryptography, information theory, and computer security by providing convenient encryption and decryption methods. Motivated by Shapiro's open questions, Riordan involutions have been intensely investigated as a combinatorial concept. In this paper, we investigate invariant sequences by means of the eigenspaces of \(PD\) and \(P^TD\), where \(P\) is the Pascal matrix and \(D\) an infinite diagonal matrix with alternating diagonal entries in \(\{1, \,-1\}\) (see Sections 2, 3). In fact, \(PD\) and \(P^TD\) are involutory matrices and \(PD\) is a Riordan involution. Our investigation follows the ideas and connections of invariant sequences to the eigenspaces of \(PD\) and \(P^TD\) developed in Choi et al.. This will allow us to associate (inverse) invariant sequences of the first and second kinds, as well as identify and construct such sequences (Section 4).
# Notation and preliminaries
The following notation and conventions are used throughout the manuscript.
- The infinite matrices in this paper have infinite numbers of rows \(i\) and columns \(j\), with \(i,j\in\{0,1, 2, \ldots\}\).
- \(\mathbf{E}_\lambda (A)\) denotes the eigenspace of a (finite or infinite) matrix \(A\) corresponding to its eigenvalue \(\lambda\).
- For a matrix \(A\) with columns \(A_j\) (\(j=0,1, 2, \ldots\)) and with \({\mathbf 0}_j\) denoting the vector of zeros in \(\mathbb{R}^j\), \({A\hspace{0.01cm}^\downarrow}\) denotes the matrix whose \(j\)th column is \({\displaystyle \left[\begin{matrix} \mathbf 0_j\\ A_j \end{matrix} \right] }\) where \(\mathbf 0_0\) is vacuous.
- For a matrix \(A\), its (possibly infinite) row and column index sets are \(J\) and \(K\), respectively. For \(J_0 \subseteq J, K_0 \subseteq K\), let \(A(J_0|K_0)\) denote the matrix obtained from \(A\) by deleting rows in \(J_0\) and columns in \(K_0\), and let \(A[J_0|K_0]\) denote the matrix \(A(\bar{J_0}|\bar{K_0})\), where \(\bar{J_0}=J\setminus J_0, \bar{K_0}=K\setminus K_0\). For brevity, write \(A(\cdot|K_0)\) and \(A(J_0|\cdot)\) in place of \(A(\emptyset|K_0)\) and \(A(J_0|\emptyset)\), respectively. Further, for \(m,n\in\{0,1, 2, \ldots\}\), we let \(A_{m,n}=A[\{0,1, 2, \ldots, m\}|\{0,1, 2, \ldots, n\}]\); \(A_{m,m}\) is abbreviated by \(A_m\).
- The binomial coefficient ("\(i\) choose \(j\)\") is denoted by \(i\choose j\) with the convention that it equals \(0\) when \(i<j\) or \(j<0\).
- \(P=\left[\begin{matrix} {i}\choose{j} \end{matrix} \right]\) \((i,j=0, 1, 2, \ldots)\) denotes the (infinite) *Pascal matrix*.
- \(D={\rm diag}(1,-1, 1,-1, \ldots)\).
- Infinite real sequences \(\{x_n\}\) are identified with the infinite dimensional real vector space \(\mathbb{R}^\infty\) consisting of column vectors \(\mathbf{x}=[x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots ]^T\).
Notice that as a consequence of the binomial inversion formula ([\[b1\]](#b1){reference-type="ref" reference="b1"}), we have that \[P^{-1}=DPD= \left[ (-1)^{i-j} \begin{matrix} {i}\choose{j} \end{matrix} \right] \;\; (i,j=0, 1, 2, \ldots).\] Thus \((PD)^{-1}=PD\) and ([\[b1\]](#b1){reference-type="ref" reference="b1"}) can be converted into a vector equation for \(\mathbf{x}=[a_0,a_1, a_2, \ldots]^T\) and \(\mathbf{y}=[b_0,b_1, b_2, \ldots]^T \in \mathbb{R}^\infty\), as follows: \[\label{vbf} PD\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{y} \;\;\; \mbox{\rm if and only if} \;\;\; PD\mathbf{y}=\mathbf{x}.\]
Let \(\mathbf{F}=[F_0, F_1, F_2, \ldots ]^T\) and \(\mathbf{L}=[L_0, L_1, L_2, \ldots]^T\) denote the vectors in \(\mathbb{R}^{\infty}\) whose entries are the members of the Fibonacci and Lucas sequences, respectively; that is \[F_0=0, \; F_1=1, \; F_n=F_{n-1}+F_{n-2} \;\; (n\geq 2),\] \[L_0=2, \; L_1=1, \; L_n=L_{n-1}+L_{n-2} \;\; (n\geq 2).\] The generating functions of \(\mathbf{F}\) and \(\mathbf{L}\) are \(h_1(x)={x \over {1-x-x^2}}\) and \(h_2(x)={{2-x}\over {1-x-x^2}}\), respectively. The following fact is known, however we include a proof for completeness.
That is, \(-1\) and \(1\) are eigenvalues of \(PD\) and consequently of \(P^TD\). In fact, these are the only eigenvalues of \(PD\) and \(P^TD\); see. The corresponding eigenspaces are infinite dimensional. Indeed, if we consider the Pascal-type matrices \({P\hspace{0.01cm}^\downarrow}\) and \({Q\hspace{0.01cm}^\downarrow}\) constructed via the Pascal matrix \(P\) and the matrix \[Q=P+\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1 & {\mathbf 0}^T\\ {\mathbf 0}& P \end{array}\right],\] then, as shown in, the columns of \[\left[\begin{matrix} {\mathbf 0}^T\\ {P\hspace{0.01cm}^\downarrow} \end{matrix} \right]\quad \mbox{and} \quad {Q\hspace{0.01cm}^\downarrow}\] form bases for \(\mathbf{E}_{-1}(PD)\) and \(\mathbf{E}_{1}(PD)\), respectively. The following observation follows directly from the definitions and properties mentioned above.
Based on Observation [\[obs1\]](#obs1){reference-type="ref" reference="obs1"}, our goal is to study the eigenspaces \(\mathbf{E}_\lambda (PD)\) and \(\mathbf{E}_\lambda (P^TD)\) (\(\lambda \in \{ 1,-1\}\)) and discover their relationships. Our approach entails showing the existence of an infinite invertible matrix \(N\) such that \[\label{goal1} N(P^TD)N^{-1}=(P_1^TD_1)\bigoplus (P_1^TD_1)\bigoplus \cdots \bigoplus (P_1^TD_1)\bigoplus \cdots\] and \[\label{goal2} D(N^{-1})^TD\,(PD)\,DN^TD=(P_1D_1)\bigoplus (P_1D_1)\bigoplus \cdots \bigoplus (P_1D_1)\bigoplus \cdots,\] which are infinite direct sums of copies of \(P_1^TD_1\) and \(P_1D_1\), respectively. This result will be applied to characterize \(\mathbf{E}_\lambda(PD)\) and \(\mathbf{E}_\lambda(P^TD)\). Extending the work in, we will also show that the columns of \(P^{T\downarrow}\) and \({Q}^{T\downarrow}(0|0)\) form bases for \(\mathbf{E}_\lambda(P^TD)\). This will indeed allow us to investigate the relationships between invariant sequences of the first and second kinds.
# The Eigenspaces of \(P^TD\) and \(PD\)
Let \(A=[a_{ij}]\) \((i, j=0, 1, 2, \dots)\) be the matrix defined by \[a_{ij}=\left \{ \begin{array}{lr} (-1)^{j-i}, & {\rm if}~ i \leq j, \\ 0, & {\rm if}~ i>j, \end{array} \right.\] and let \(J(a)\) denote the infinite Jordan block of the form \[\left[ \begin{array}{ccccccc} ~~ a & 1 & & & & & \\ ~~ & a & 1 & & & O& \\ & & a & 1 & & & \\ & & & \ddots & \ddots & & \\ & & & & a & 1 &\\ & & O & & & a &\ddots\\ & & & & & & \ddots~~ \end{array} \right].\] It readily follows that \(A^{-1}=J(1)\). In the next two lemmas, we will construct an infinite matrix \(N\) and its inverse \(M=N^{-1}\), which will give rise to similarity transformations of \(P^TD\) and \(PD\) into direct sums as in ([\[goal1\]](#goal1){reference-type="ref" reference="goal1"}) and ([\[goal2\]](#goal2){reference-type="ref" reference="goal2"}).
The *difference sequence* \(\Delta \mathbf{a}=[\Delta a_0, \Delta a_1, \Delta a_2, \ldots]^T\) of a sequence \(\mathbf{a}=[a_0, a_1, a_2, \ldots ]^T\) is defined by \(\Delta a_i=a_{i+1}-a_i\) for each \(i=0, 1, 2, \ldots\) Let \(\Delta^k \mathbf{a}=[\Delta^k a_0, \Delta^k a_1, \Delta^k a_2, \ldots ]^T\) \((k=0, 1, 2, \ldots)\) be the \(k\)th difference sequence defined inductively by \(\Delta^k \mathbf{a}=\Delta(\Delta^{k-1} \mathbf{a})\), where \(\Delta^0 \mathbf{a}=\mathbf{a}\). The infinite matrix \[\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} a_0 & a_1 & a_2 & \cdots~\\ \Delta a_0 & \Delta a_1 & \Delta a_2 & \cdots~ \\ \Delta^2 a_0 & \Delta^2 a_1 & \Delta^2 a_2 & \cdots~ \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots \end{array}\right]\] is called the *difference matrix* of \(\mathbf{a}\). It is well known that for each \(n=0,1,2, \ldots\), \[a_n= a_0 {{n}\choose{0}} + \Delta a_0 {{n}\choose{1}} + \Delta^2 a_0 {{n}\choose{2}}+ \cdots + \Delta^n a_0 {{n}\choose{n}},\] which is used in the proof of the following lemma.
Let \(M_{(t)}=U_{(1)} U_{(2)}\cdots U_{(t)}\), where \(U_{(j)}=I_{2j-2}\bigoplus J(1)\) (\(j=1, 2, \ldots, t\)). Then, by Lemmas [\[lemma1\]](#lemma1){reference-type="ref" reference="lemma1"} and [\[lemma2\]](#lemma2){reference-type="ref" reference="lemma2"}, we have \(\lim_{t \to \infty}M_{(t)}=M\), which is the matrix in Lemma [\[lemma2\]](#lemma2){reference-type="ref" reference="lemma2"}. In fact we have \[N= \left[ \begin{array}{ccccccccc} ~ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 1 &-1 & 1 &-1 & 1 &-1 & 1 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 1 &-1 & 1 &-1 & 1 &-1 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 1 &-2 & 3 &-4 & 5 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 &-2 & 3 &-4 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 &-3 & 6 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 &-3 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 &0 & 0 & 1 & \cdots~\\ ~\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots &\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots~ \end{array} \right]\] and \[M=N^{-1} = \left[ \begin{array}{ccccccccc} ~ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 1 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 & 3 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & \cdots~\\ \vdots& \vdots&\vdots &\vdots&\vdots& \vdots &\vdots & \vdots& \ddots~ \end{array} \right].\] We can now state and prove the similarity transformations of \(PD\) and \(P^TD\) claimed in ([\[goal1\]](#goal1){reference-type="ref" reference="goal1"}) and ([\[goal2\]](#goal2){reference-type="ref" reference="goal2"}).
Let \(\mathbf e_i\) denote the \(i\)th column of the identity matrix \(I\) (\(i=0, 1, \ldots\)). Then \(\mathbf{E}_{\lambda} (P^TD)\) and \(\mathbf{E}_{\lambda} (PD)\) (\(\lambda \in \{ 1,-1\}\)) can be characterized via Theorem [\[similarity\]](#similarity){reference-type="ref" reference="similarity"} as follows:
Consider now \[{P^T\hspace{0.01cm}^\downarrow}=\left[\begin{array}{ccccccccc} ~ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 1 & 3 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 3 & 4 & 1 & 0 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 6 & 5 & 1 & 0 & \cdots~\\ ~0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 &10 & 6 & 1 & \cdots~\\ ~\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots &\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots~ \end{array}\right].\] The following is a matrix expression of Theorem [\[bases\]](#bases){reference-type="ref" reference="bases"}; the last two clauses appeared in.
# Invariant sequences of two kinds: Relations and examples
We begin by some basic examples of (inverse) invariant sequences.
In the following theorem, we provide a general mechanism for transforming invariant into inverse invariant sequences, and vice versa.
Let \(\tau_1={{1+\sqrt{5}}\over 2}\) and \(\tau_2={{1-\sqrt{5}}\over 2}\). It is well known that \(F_n={1 \over \sqrt{5}}\tau_1^{n}-{1 \over \sqrt{5}}\tau_2^{n}\) and \(L_n=\tau_1^{n}+\tau_2^{n}\) where \(F_n\) and \(L_n\) are the \(n\)th terms of \({\mathbf F}\) and \({\mathbf L}\), respectively (\(n=0, 1, 2, \ldots\)) . Since \(J(0){\mathbf F}\) is an invariant sequence of the second kind by ([\[fibo\]](#fibo){reference-type="ref" reference="fibo"}), it follows from Theorem [\[transform\]](#transform){reference-type="ref" reference="transform"} (a) that \[J(1)^TJ(0){\mathbf F}+J(0)^TJ(0){\mathbf F}=J(1)^TJ(0){\mathbf F}+{\mathbf F}\] is an inverse invariant sequence of the second kind. In fact, the \(n\)th term (\(n=0, 1, 2, \ldots\)) of \(J(1)^TJ(0){\mathbf F}+{\mathbf F}\) is \[{1 \over \sqrt{5}}\tau_1^{n+2}-{1 \over \sqrt{5}}\tau_2^{n+2}+ {1 \over \sqrt{5}}\tau_1^{n}-{1 \over \sqrt{5}}\tau_2^{n}=L_{n+1},\] which implies that \(J(1)^TJ(0){\mathbf F}+{\mathbf F}=J(0){\mathbf L}\). On the other hand, since for each \(i\) and \(j\) with \(i, j=0, 1, 2,\ldots\), \[J(2)^{-1}=\left \{ \begin{array}{lr} (-1)^{j-i}({1 \over 2})^{j-i+1}, & {\rm if}~ i \leq j, \\ 0, & {\rm if}~ i>j, \end{array} \right.\] and the \(n\)-th term of \(J(2)^{-1}J(0)^2{\mathbf L}\) is \[\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}(-1)^k(1/2)^{k+1}(\tau_1^{k+2+n}+\tau_2^{k+2+n})={1 \over \sqrt{5}}\tau_1^{n+1}-{1 \over \sqrt{5}}\tau_2^{n+1}=F_{n+1},\] we have \(J(2)^{-1}J(0)^2{\mathbf L}=J(0){\mathbf F}\), which is an invariant sequence of the second kind by Theorem [\[transform\]](#transform){reference-type="ref" reference="transform"} (b), as stated in Example [\[fibomat\]](#fibomat){reference-type="ref" reference="fibomat"}. It directly follows from Theorem [\[transform\]](#transform){reference-type="ref" reference="transform"} (d) that \((J(0)+J(-1)){\mathbf F}\), namely \(\,\mathbf L\), is an invariant sequence of the first kind. Since for each \(i\) and \(j\) with \(i, j=0, 1, 2,\ldots\), \[-J(-2)^{-1}=\left \{ \begin{array}{lr} ({1 \over 2})^{j-i+1}, & {\rm if}~ i \leq j, \\ 0, & {\rm if}~ i>j, \end{array} \right.\] we obtain \(\left(-J(-2)^{-1}\right)^T [0,{\mathbf L}^T]^T=\mathbf F\), which is an inverse invariant sequence of the first kind by Theorem [\[transform\]](#transform){reference-type="ref" reference="transform"} (c), because for \(n=0, 1, 2, \ldots\), \[\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(1/2)^{n-k}L_k=(1/2)^{n}~\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}((2\tau_1)^{k}+(2\tau_2)^{k}) ={1 \over \sqrt{5}}\tau^{n}-{1 \over \sqrt{5}}\tau_2^{n}=F_n.\] The sequence \(\mathbf B=(B_0, B_1, \ldots)^T\) defined by \(B_0=1\) and \(\sum_{k=0}^{n} {{n+1} \choose k}B_k=0~(n \geq 1)\) comprises the Bernoulli numbers and \(D \mathbf B\) is an invariant sequence of the first kind , which also follows directly from the fact that \(PDD \mathbf B=D \mathbf B\). A new inverse invariant sequence of the first kind from the Bernoulli numbers \(\mathbf B\) is provided next. See Table \(1\) for explicit members of these sequences.
By Theorem [\[transform\]](#transform){reference-type="ref" reference="transform"} (d), we get \(D \mathbf B=(J(0)+J(-1)){\mathbf K}\), since the first component of \((J(0)+J(-1)){\mathbf K}\) is clearly \((-1)^0B_0\), and for \(i=1, 2, \ldots\), \(i\)th component of \((J(0)+J(-1)){\mathbf K}\) is \[-\sum_{k=0}^{i-1}(1/2)^{i-k}(-1)^kB_k+2\sum_{k=0}^{i}(1/2)^{i+1-k}(-1)^kB_k=(-1)^iB_i.\] By Corollary [\[columns\]](#columns){reference-type="ref" reference="columns"} and Theorem [\[transform\]](#transform){reference-type="ref" reference="transform"}, we can directly get more (inverse) invariant sequences of the first and second kind as follows:
In the next two theorems, we obtain direct relationships among (inverse) invariant sequences of the first kind and (inverse) invariant sequences of the second kind.
The following lemma is a useful tool for proving the final theorem.
The following theorem is a form of converse of Theorem [\[new2\]](#new2){reference-type="ref" reference="new2"}. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:02:31', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01573', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01573'} |
# Introduction {#introduction .unnumbered}
The quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE) allows the resistance quantization and dissipationless edge states seen in the quantum Hall effect, but without the need for an applied magnetic field. The topologically-protected edge states of the QAHE are also chiral and spin-polarised, acting as a natural spin filter. Additional applications are starting to be explored, for example in spintronics as a pure spin current source or detector, and in topological quantum computing. In experimental devices, the QAHE is remarkably robust, and has been observed in chromium-and vanadium-doped (Bi, Sb)\(_2\)Te\(_3\) across a range of film thicknesses, and grown on multiple substrates. Quantization has been improved by reducing film thickness and doping with vanadium to suppress dissipative channels, but whether these variables affect the crystal structure and electronic band structure has largely been overlooked experimentally. To date, the *a*-axis parameter has only been determined for Cr-doped (Bi, Sb)\(_2\)Te\(_3\) grown on SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1) with or without a Te capping layer, with no systematic study of the role of thickness or doping level. This is despite the potential for uniaxial or biaxial strain in the films to either drive these materials into the topologically trivial (non-QAH) regime by altering the band structure, or affect the fabrication and performance of ferromagnetic/non-ferromagnetic topological insulator heterostructure devices due to lattice mismatch. Here, we conduct a comprehensive study of the effect of thickness, vanadium-doping and substrate choice on the crystal structure of MBE-grown (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_x\)Te\(_3\) thin films, and compare to existing results in the literature. We use high-resolution X-ray diffractometry (HRXRD) to determine the in-and out-of-plane lattice parameters, orientation relationships and epitaxial quality of the film, substrate, and Te capping layer. The HRXRD data is supported by information about the local structure and doping, provided by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX).
# Results {#results .unnumbered}
## Crystallinity and elemental composition {#crystallinity-and-elemental-composition .unnumbered}
We first demonstrate the quality of the films with symmetrical high-resolution X-ray diffraction measurements, probing planes parallel to the substrate. Figure [\[epitaxy\]](#epitaxy){reference-type="ref" reference="epitaxy"}a shows a 2\(\theta\)/\(\omega\) scan of a 4 QL (quintuple layer, each QL \(\approx\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1 nm) film of (Bi, Sb)\(_{1.89}\)V\(_{0.11}\)Te\(_3\) on a SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1) substrate, with a 10 nm Te capping layer. We observe (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) peaks at (0 0 3\(n\)), as expected for its space group \(R\bar{3}m\), and tellurium peaks at (\(m\) 0 0), echoing previous results on Cr-doped (Bi, Sb)\(_2\)Te\(_3\). Both layers grow epitaxially, as shown by the rocking curves in Figure [\[epitaxy\]](#epitaxy){reference-type="ref" reference="epitaxy"}b-[\[epitaxy\]](#epitaxy){reference-type="ref" reference="epitaxy"}d (rocking curves taken on the (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) (0 0 6), Te (1 0 0) and (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) (0 0 15) peaks, respectively). The (Bi, Sb)\(_{1.89}\)V\(_{0.11}\)Te\(_3\) (Figure [\[epitaxy\]](#epitaxy){reference-type="ref" reference="epitaxy"}b and [\[epitaxy\]](#epitaxy){reference-type="ref" reference="epitaxy"}d) has a smaller full-width at half-maximum (FWHM, Gaussian fit) than tellurium: \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.11\(^{\circ}\) as opposed to 0.65\(^{\circ}\). The (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_x\)Te\(_3\) (0 0 6) curve shows dual peaks \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.15\(^{\circ}\) from the expected value of \(\omega\), consistent with the observation of twinned crystal domains in Cr-doped films. These results hold for all samples grown on SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1), even with changes to doping and thickness. Figure [\[epitaxy\]](#epitaxy){reference-type="ref" reference="epitaxy"}e shows 2\(\theta\)/\(\omega\) scans of samples with \(x\) = 0.06-0.07 and thicknesses of 4, 10 and 20 QLs (black, red and blue, respectively). The plots are offset for clarity. The changes in doping and thickness do not affect the relative intensities of the peaks. The (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) *c*-axis appears to shorten as the thickness increases; this is clearly seen in the 2\(\theta\) position of the (0 0 24) peak as it changes relative to the Te (3 0 0) peak, which in turn stays constant with respect to SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1). However, averages of Gaussian fits to 3 reflections show that 4 and 10 QL films have approximately equal thickness (30.51 \(\pm\) 0.05 Åand 30.54 \(\pm\) 0.04 Årespectively, compared to *c* = 30.44 \(\pm\) 0.02 Åfor the 20 QL film). HRXRD measurements of 10 QL films grown on Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 0 0 1) and Si (1 1 1) show very similar epitaxial growth and out-of-plane lattice parameters (See Supplementary Figure S1). The (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) lattice constant *c* = 30.47 \(\pm\) 0.08 Å and 30.45 \(\pm\) 0.07 Å, respectively, a slight decrease compared to 30.54 \(\pm\) 0.03 Å on SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1) (10 QL film). On an Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 0 0 1) substrate, rocking curves on (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) (0 0 15) and Te (1 0 0) have a FWHM of 0.12\(^{\circ}\) and 0.77\(^{\circ}\), respectively, similar to the SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1) samples. Growth appears to be more disordered on Si (1 1 1), where the (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) (0 0 15) rocking curve has a larger FWHM of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.36\(^{\circ}\). We now investigate the local crystallinity and interfaces using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). The High Angle Annular Dark Field (HAADF) signal, generating the images shown in Figure [\[TEM\]](#TEM){reference-type="ref" reference="TEM"}, is proportional to the local thickness and atomic number. For a relatively homogeneous thickness, such as a TEM lamella, the brightness is proportional to the average Z for a given pixel such that brighter atomic columns correspond to heavier atoms. We observe regular growth of the QLs, with homogeneous thickness of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1 nm for each layer (Figure [\[TEM\]](#TEM){reference-type="ref" reference="TEM"}a and [\[TEM\]](#TEM){reference-type="ref" reference="TEM"}b). The Te capping layer is crystalline and appears to grow at an angle of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}7\(^{\circ}\) to the underlying quintuple layers. However, detailed HRXRD indicates that this is not the case (see Figure [\[inplane\]](#inplane){reference-type="ref" reference="inplane"} and discussion). While above the first QL we observe good epitaxial growth, the interface between STO and the QLs is relatively irregular, with the first QL being discontinuous and heavy atomic species coexisting with the lighter substrate. The SrTiO\(_3\) substrate also displays a change in contrast over a thickness of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1.5 nm at the substrate surface, where a lower HAADF signal suggests that only light elements are present. STEM-EDX (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy) elemental maps are reported in Figure [\[TEM\]](#TEM){reference-type="ref" reference="TEM"}c (non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) of the EDX data is shown in Supplementary Figure S2). The Pt signal originates from the protective layer deposited during focused ion beam (FIB) sample preparation. The QL region contains strong signals from Bi, Sb, V and Te, which are all homogeneous throughout the device thickness. Tellurium extends above the active region into the capping layer. As expected, Sr, Ti and O signals dominate the substrate region. However, Ti and O extend further towards the (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) compared to Sr, indicating that the interfacial region that appears darker in the STEM-HAADF images has a lower Sr concentration than the bulk SrTiO\(_3\). Having confirmed that the films are epitaxial and homogeneously doped, we use reciprocal space mapping of asymmetrical peaks (those whose corresponding atomic planes are not parallel to the substrate) to find the in-plane orientations of the substrate, ferromagnetic topological insulator, and capping layer. Figure [\[inplane\]](#inplane){reference-type="ref" reference="inplane"}a-[\[inplane\]](#inplane){reference-type="ref" reference="inplane"}c shows reciprocal space maps of a 10 QL, x = 0.07 sample, where \(S_x\) is the reciprocal of the in-plane d-spacing, and \(S_z\) is the reciprocal of the out-of-plane d-spacing. The three maps show equivalent areas of reciprocal space at three different azimuthal angles. The maps include the (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) (1 0 20) and Te (2 1 1) peaks (right-and left-hand side of the panels, respectively). Figure [\[inplane\]](#inplane){reference-type="ref" reference="inplane"}a also shows (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) (1 0 19) directly below (1 0 20). Whilst the higher-intensity (1 0 20) peak has the expected six-fold symmetry of a (Bi, Sb)\(_2\)Te\(_3\)-based compound, the appearance of the Te (2 1 1) peak at all three angles indicates that the capping layer is polycrystalline. Azimuthal angle scans confirm these findings (Figure [\[inplane\]](#inplane){reference-type="ref" reference="inplane"}d), and indicate the epitaxial relationship (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) \[0 1 0\] // SrTiO\(_3\) \[1 1 \(\bar{2}\)\]. Note that one of the Te peaks was not captured in this scan due to slight sample misalignment, and that the broader peaks visible on the thin-film scans are due to sample geometry, confirmed by repeating the measurement away from the peaks. We also observe a Te (2 1 0) peak at \(\Delta\phi \approx\) 53\(^{\circ}\) from Te (2 1 1), confirming that the \(a\)-and \(c\)-axes of the tellurium cap are in-plane (see Supplementary Figure S3), and an epitaxial relationship of (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) \[1 0 0\] // Te \[\(\bar{1}\) 2 2\]. Since the crystallographic axes are in-plane, we conclude that the \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}7.4\(^{\circ}\) tilt observed with STEM is not a tilt of the unit cell itself, but rather an alignment of Te atoms revealed by an off-axis cut.
## Thickness, doping and substrate dependence of lattice parameters {#thickness-doping-and-substrate-dependence-of-lattice-parameters .unnumbered}
To determine whether the unit cell of (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_{x}\)Te\(_3\) changes with doping level or film thickness, we repeat the reciprocal-space measurements detailed above. A longer counting time is used in order to precisely determine the in-and out-of-plane lattice parameters. Figure [\[doping\]](#doping){reference-type="ref" reference="doping"} is a comparison of 4 QL films with \(x\) = 0.06 and 0.11, and Figure [\[thickness\]](#thickness){reference-type="ref" reference="thickness"} shows reciprocal space maps for 4, 10 and 20 QL films on SrTiO\(_3\), and 10 QL films on Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 0 0 1) and Si (1 1 1). Table [1](#table){reference-type="ref" reference="table"} summarises the calculated lattice parameters, along with previous HRXRD results from the literature for comparison. Reciprocal-space maps (Figure [\[doping\]](#doping){reference-type="ref" reference="doping"}a and b, x = 0.06 and 0.11, respectively) and 2\(\theta\)/\(\omega\) scans (Figure [\[doping\]](#doping){reference-type="ref" reference="doping"}c, \(x\) = 0.11 data (grey) offset for clarity) indicate that the \(c\)-axis lengthens as the doping is increased. From the asymmetrical peaks (Figure [\[doping\]](#doping){reference-type="ref" reference="doping"}a and [\[doping\]](#doping){reference-type="ref" reference="doping"}b), \(c\) = 30.55 \(\pm\) 0.42 Å for \(x\) = 0.06 and 30.50 \(\pm\) 0.42 Å for \(x\) = 0.11, whereas from the symmetrical peak measurements (Figure [\[doping\]](#doping){reference-type="ref" reference="doping"}c), \(c\) = 30.51 \(\pm\) 0.05 Å and 30.62 \(\pm\) 0.06 Å. For both doping levels, *c* is still close to the bulk value of 30.60 Å. The in-plane lattice parameter is also close to the bulk value (\(a\) = 4.30 Å). For the \(x\) = 0.06 and 0.11 films, the \(a\)-axis parameter is 4.28 \(\pm\) 0.14 Å or 4.26 \(\pm\) 0.15 Å, respectively, and matches to the effective in-plane spacing of the substrate (3.565 Å) with a 30\(^{\circ}\) rotation (\(a^{TI}\cos 30^{\circ}\) = 3.71 Å). The slight discrepancy may be due to the Sr-deficient interfacial layer shown in Figure [\[TEM\]](#TEM){reference-type="ref" reference="TEM"}, which appears to have a larger lattice than the bulk of the substrate. The in-plane parameter also remains constant as a function of thickness (Figure [\[thickness\]](#thickness){reference-type="ref" reference="thickness"}a-[\[thickness\]](#thickness){reference-type="ref" reference="thickness"}c): the 10 and 20 QL samples (\(x\) = 0.07, Figure [\[thickness\]](#thickness){reference-type="ref" reference="thickness"}b and [\[thickness\]](#thickness){reference-type="ref" reference="thickness"}c) have \(a\) = 4.28 \(\pm\) 0.16 Å and 4.30 \(\pm\) 0.16 Å. Out-of-plane, the thickest (20 QL) film has a smaller \(c\), at 30.34 \(\pm\) 0.41 Å. The 10 and 4 QL films have similar unit cells, with \(c\) = 30.54 \(\pm\) 0.43 Å and 30.55 \(\pm\) 0.42 Å. Figure [\[thickness\]](#thickness){reference-type="ref" reference="thickness"}b, [\[thickness\]](#thickness){reference-type="ref" reference="thickness"}d and [\[thickness\]](#thickness){reference-type="ref" reference="thickness"}e shows data taken for 10 QL films grown on SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1), Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 0 0 1) and Si (1 1 1), respectively. There is very little difference between the in-plane parameters on the three substrates: \(a\) = 4.28 \(\pm\) 0.16, 4.29 \(\pm\) 0.04 and 4.30 \(\pm\) 0.20 Å, respectively. Out-of-plane, the film grown on Si (1 1 1) appears to have a shorter unit cell, 30.22 \(\pm\) 0.41 Å as opposed to 30.49 \(\pm\) 0.32 Å on Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) and 30.54 \(\pm\) 0.43 Å on SrTiO\(_3\). The Te (2 1 1) peak was not observed for the Si (1 1 1) sample; based on the relative peak breadths and intensities of symmetric 2\(\theta\)/\(\omega\) scans, the Te capping layer was too thin (2--5 nm) for the peak to be detected (see Supplementary Figure S1). The peaks measured on Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 0 0 1) and Si (1 1 1) were all less intense and broader than for the equivalent film grown on SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1), which indicates less well-defined crystallographic orientation in-plane. Whilst the thickness of the films contributes to the breadth and low intensity of the peaks, Scherrer fits to the symmetrical data show that the nominally 10 QL films on SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1), Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 0 0 1) and Si (1 1 1) are 9.9 \(\pm\) 1.9 nm, 10.8 \(\pm\) 0.1 nm and 7.2 \(\pm\) 0.8 nm, respectively, which does not correlate to the observed difference in intensity.
# Discussion {#discussion .unnumbered}
Our results, and those from previous HRXRD studies of ferromagnetic (Bi, Sb)\(_2\)Te\(_3\), are presented in Table [1](#table){reference-type="ref" reference="table"}. Figure [\[schematic\]](#schematic){reference-type="ref" reference="schematic"} is a schematic summarizing the results for 10 QL of (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_x\)Te\(_3\) on SrTiO\(_3\), with a Te capping layer. Surprisingly, measurements of the in-plane lattice constant of these quantum anomalous Hall insulators have only been made for Cr-doped films grown on SrTiO\(_3\) (see Table [1](#table){reference-type="ref" reference="table"}), even though the QAHE has also been observed in (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)Cr\(_x\)Te\(_3\) on InP (1 1 1), Si (1 1 1) and GaAs (1 1 1), and grown on Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 0 0 1). Vanadium-doped films have not previously been characterised in-plane. Although we do not observe significant differences in the (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_x\)Te\(_3\) unit cell between various doping levels, thicknesses or substrates, there are small trends in *c*, whereas *a* remains unchanged across all the samples measured. The latter indicates that (Bi, Sb)\(_{2}\)Te\(_3\) does not strongly match to the substrate, perhaps due to weak, Van der Waals bonding between quintuple layers and the substrate. Doping with vanadium or chromium slightly lengthens the unit cell along the *c*-axis, though asymmetrical measurements show no difference between our V-doped samples. Where data is available for comparison, 20 QL films have a shorter unit cell than 4--10 QL films. This could be due to changing conditions during growth, or perhaps a gradient in the doping after around 10 QL (up to at least 10 QL, V-doping is homogeneous, as shown by EDX). Finally, the unit cells of films grown on Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 0 0 1) and SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1) are almost identical, but the *c*-axis on Si (1 1 1) is consistently smaller. This may be because Si (1 1 1) is not as close a match to the (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_x\)Te\(_3\) lattice as Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 0 0 1) and SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1)---rocking curves on the latter samples also show far less disorder (see Supplementary Figure S1). Although small changes in the unit cell within the parameters used here indicate that strain engineering is not feasible, the lack of biaxial strain in particular is important for growth of doped/undoped heterostructures such as those in Reference .
:::
We also find that the crystal structure of the V-doped films is unchanged compared to Cr-doped (Bi, Sb)\(_2\)Te\(_3\), and that the Te capping layer is epitaxial and grows in three equivalent orientations on (Bi, Sb)\(_2\)Te\(_3\). For all our samples, we observe the epitaxial relationship (Bi, Sb)\(_2\)Te\(_3\) \[1 0 0\] // Te \[\(\bar{1}\) 2 2\]. The slight out-of-plane disorder in the Te capping layer (observed as a larger FWHM of the rocking curve than (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_x\)Te\(_3\)) is probably due to dislocations at monocrystalline domain boundaries or island formation on the top of the topological insulator during growth (as observed in STEM measurements). In summary, we have investigated the crystal structure of the ferromagnetic topological insulator (Bi, Sb)\(_{2-x}\)V\(_x\)Te\(_3\) as a function of doping level, thickness and substrate, using high-resolution X-ray diffractometry supported by STEM and EDX. Focusing on the range commonly used in devices, we find that the unit cell is largely unaffected by vanadium doping changes of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2 at.%, and remains unchanged over a thickness range of 4--10 quintuple layers (4--10 nm). Substrate choice does not affect the in-plane lattice parameter (*a*), however, out-of-plane the *c*-axis is weakly reduced in films grown on less closely lattice-matched substrates. These results are consistent with previous studies of ferromagnetic topological insulators. We also confirm the previous results of Park *et al.* regarding the Te capping layer growth and orientation, which grows epitaxially in three equivalent orientations on (Bi, Sb)\(_{2}\)Te\(_3\). Since the in-plane lattice parameter remains constant over this experimentally-relevant range, heterostructures of doped and undoped (Bi, Sb)\(_{2}\)Te\(_3\) (for example, References and ) are a more promising route to applications than devices which rely on inducing strain to tailor the electronic band structure (as in Reference ).
# Methods {#methods .unnumbered}
Vanadium-doped bismuth antimony telluride films were grown on SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1), Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 0 0 1) and Si (1 1 1) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy, and capped with 10 nm of tellurium (a detailed description is given in Chang et al. ). We performed high-resolution X-ray diffractometry on 4, 10 and 20 quintuple-layer films in a Panalytical Empyrean (Series 2) \(\theta\)-\(\theta\) diffractometer. Optics were optimised for intensity over resolution due to the film thickness. We used a Ge(2 2 0) hybrid monochromator (for Cu\(_{\kappa_{\alpha}}\)), and a 1/2\(^{\circ}\) divergence slit on the incident beam. Diffracted-beam optics comprised either a Xe proportional counter and 1 mm beam tunnel (for symmetrical 2\(\theta\)/\(\omega\) measurements and rocking curves), or a PIXcel\(^{3D}\) (Medipix2) detector in 1D frame grab mode (for asymmetrical reciprocal space measurements). Typically, a step time of at least 10s was required to detect the thin-film peaks, whereas the data shown in Figure [\[thickness\]](#thickness){reference-type="ref" reference="thickness"} has a step time of 20 minutes. Reciprocal-space maps are measured relative to the STO (1 1 2), Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) (0 1 -1 8) or Si (3 3 1) peak. A cross-sectional sample for TEM analysis was prepared using a dual beam FIB/SEM (FEI Helios Nanolab), from a 10 quintuple-layer film on SrTiO\(_3\) (1 1 1). STEM-EDX analysis was carried out in a FEI Osiris, operated at 200 kV, equipped with a set of four EDX detectors in a cross configuration (Super-X by Bruker). Elemental maps were denoised using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) routines integrated in Hyperspy, an open source toolkit for EM data analysis, and the maps shown in Figure [\[TEM\]](#TEM){reference-type="ref" reference="TEM"}c are 100x40 px, with a px size 0.5 nm x 0.5 nm and Gaussian blur 0.5 px for display. The High Resolution STEM images (HRSTEM) were acquired on a probe-corrected FEI Titan with an acceleration voltage of 300 kV. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:08:35', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01848', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01848'} |
null | null |
# Introduction
The need for search often arises from a person's need to achieve a goal, or a task such as booking travels, buying a house, etc., which would lead to search processes that are often lengthy, iterative, and are characterized by distinct stages and shifting goals. . Thus, identifying and representing these tasks properly is highly important for devising search systems that can help end users complete their tasks. It has previously been shown that these task representations can be used to provide users with better query suggestions, offer improved personalization, provide better recommendations, help in satisfaction prediction and search result re-ranking. Moreover, accurate representations of tasks could also be highly useful in aptly placing the user in the task-subtask space to contextually target the user in terms of better recommendations and advertisements, developing task specific ranking of documents, and developing task based evaluation metrics to model user satisfaction. Given the wide range of applications these tasks representations can be used for, significant amount of research has been devoted to task extraction and representation. Task extraction is quite a challenging problem as search engines can be used to achieve very different tasks, and each task can be defined at different levels of granularity. A major limitation in existing task-extraction methods lies in their treatment of search tasks as flat structure-less clusters which inherently lack insights about the presence or demarcation of subtasks associated with individual search tasks. In reality, often search tasks tend to be hierarchical in nature. For example, a search task like planning a wedding involves subtasks like searching for dresses, browsing different hairstyles, looking for invitation card templates, finding planners, among others. Each of these subtasks (1) could themselves be composed of multiple subtasks, and (2) would warrant issuing different queries by users to accomplish them. Hence, in order to obtain more accurate representations of tasks, new methodologies for constructing hierarchies of tasks are needed. As part of the proposed research, we consider the challenge of extracting hierarchies of search tasks and their associated subtasks from a search log given just the log data without the need of any manual annotation of any sort. In a recent poster we showed that Bayesian nonparametrics have the potential to extract a hierarchical representation of tasks ; we extend this model further to form more accurate representations of tasks. We present an efficient Bayesian nonparametric model for discovering hierarchies and propose a tree based nonparametric model to discover this rich hierarchical structure of tasks/subtasks embedded in search logs. Most existing hierarchical clustering techniques result in binary tree structures with each node decomposed into two child nodes. Given that a complex task could be composed of an arbitrary number of subtasks, these techniques cannot directly be used to construct accurate representations of tasks. In contrast, our model is capable of identifying task structures that can be composed of an arbitrary number of children. We make use of a number of evaluation methodologies to evaluate the efficacy of the proposed task extraction methodology, including quantitative and qualitative analyses along with crowdsourced judgment studies specifically catered to evaluating the quality of the extracted task hierarchies. We contend that the techniques presented expand the scope for better recommendations and search personalization and opens up new avenues for recommendations specifically targeting users based on the tasks they involve in.
# Related Work
Web search logs provide explicit clues about the information seeking behavior of users and have been extensively studied to improve search experiences of users. We cover several areas of related work and discuss how our work relates to and extends prior work.
## Task Extraction
There has been a large body of work focused on the problem of segmenting and organizing query logs into semantically coherent structures. Many such methods use the idea of a *timeout* cutoff between queries, where two consecutive queries are considered as two different sessions or tasks if the time interval between them exceeds a certain threshold. Often a 30-minute timeout is used to segment sessions. However, experimental results of these methods indicate that the timeouts are of limited utility in predicting whether two queries belong to the same task, and unsuitable for identifying session boundaries. More recent studies suggest that users often seek to complete multiple search tasks within a single search session with over 50% of search sessions having more than 2 tasks. At the same time, certain tasks require significantly more effort, time and sessions to complete with almost 60% of complex information gathering tasks continued across sessions. There have been attempts to extract in-session tasks, and cross-session tasks from query sequences based on classification and clustering methods, as well as supporting users in accomplishing these tasks. Prior work on identifying search-tasks focuses on task extraction from search sessions with the objective of segmenting a search session into disjoint sets of queries where each set represents a different task. Kotov et al. and Agichtein et al. studied the problem of cross-session task extraction via binary same-task classification, and found different types of tasks demonstrate different life spans. While such task extraction methods are good at linking a new query to an on-going task, often these query links form long chains which result in a task cluster containing queries from many potentially different tasks. With the realization that sessions are not enough to represent tasks, recent work has started exploring cross-section task extraction, which often results in complex non-homogeneous clusters of queries solving a number of related yet different tasks. Unfortunately, pairwise predictions alone cannot generate the partition of tasks efficiently and even with post-processing, the final task partitions obtained are not expressive enough to demarcate subtasks. Finally, authors in model query temporal patterns using a special class of point process called Hawkes processes, and combine topic model with Hawkes processes for simultaneously identifying and labeling search tasks. Jones et al. was the first work to consider the fact that there may be multiple subtasks associated with a user's information need and that these subtasks could be interleaved across different sessions. However, their method only focuses on the queries submitted by a single user and attempts to segment them based on whether they fall under the same information need. Hence, they only consider solving the task boundary identification and same task identification problem and cannot be used directly for task extraction. Our work alleviates the same user assumption and considers queries across different users for task extraction. Finally, in a recent poster, we proposed the idea of extracting task hierarchies and presented a basic tree extraction algorithm. Our current work extends the preliminary model in a number of dimensions including novel model of query affinities and task coherence based pruning strategy, which we observe gives substantial improvement in results. Unlike past work, we also present detailed derivation and evaluation of the extracted hierarchy and application on task extraction.
## Supporting Complex Search Tasks
There has been a significant amount of work on task continuation assistance, building task tours and trails, query suggestions, predicting next search action and notes taking when accomplishing complex tasks. The quality of most of these methods depends on forming accurate representations of tasks, which is the problem we are addressing in this paper.
## Hierarchical Models
Rich hierarchies are common in data across many domains, hence quite a few hierarchical clustering techniques have been proposed. The traditional methods for hierarchically clustering data are bottom-up agglomerative algorithms. Probabilistic methods of learning hierarchies have also been proposed along with hierarchical clustering based methods. Most algorithms for hierarchical clustering construct binary tree representations of data, where leaf nodes correspond to data points and internal nodes correspond to clusters. There are several limitations to existing hierarchy construction algorithms. The algorithms provide no guide to choosing the correct number of clusters or the level at which to prune the tree. It is often difficult to know which distance metric to choose. Additionally and more importantly, restriction of the hypothesis space to binary trees alone is undesirable in many situations-indeed, a task can have any number of subtasks, not necessarily two. Past work has also considered constructing task-specific taxonomies from document collections, browsing hierarchy construction, generating hierarchical summaries. While most of these techniques work in supervised settings on document collections, our work instead focused on short text queries and offers an unsupervised method of constructing task hierarchies. Finally, Bayesian Rose Trees and their extensions have been proposed to model arbitrary branching trees. These algorithms naively cast relationships between objects as binary (0-1) associations while the query-query relationships in general are much richer in content and structure. We consider a number of such existing methods as baselines and the various advantages of the proposed approach is highlighted in the evaluation section wherein the proposed approach in addition to being more expressive, performs better than state-of-the-art task extraction and hierarchical methods.
# Defining Search Tasks
Jones et al. was one of the first papers to point out the importance of task representations, where they defined a search task as:
Ahmed et al. later extended this definition to a more generic one, which can also capture task structures that could possibly consist of related subtasks, each of which could be complex tasks themselves or may finally split down into simpler tasks or atomic informational needs. Following Ahmed *et al.* , a complex search task can then be defined as:
[\[ComplexTask\]]{#ComplexTask label="ComplexTask"} The definition of complex tasks is much more generic, and captures all possible search tasks, that can be either complex or atomic (non-complex). Throughout this paper we adopt the definition provided in Definition [\[ComplexTask\]](#ComplexTask){reference-type="ref" reference="ComplexTask"}.2 as the definition for a search task. Hence, by definition a search task has a hierarchical nature, where each task can consist of an arbitrary number of, possibly complex subtasks. An effective task extraction system should be capable of accurately identifying and representing such hierarchical structures.
# Constructing Task Hierarchies
While hierarchical clustering are widely used for clustering, they construct binary trees which may not be the best model to describe data's intrinsic structure in many applications, for example, the task-subtask structure in our case. To remedy this, multi-branch trees are developed. Currently there are few algorithms which generate multi-branch hierarchies. Blundel *et al.* adopt a simple, deterministic, agglomerative approach called BRTs (Bayesian Rose Trees) for constructing multi-branch hierarchies. In this work, we adapt BRT as a basic algorithm and extend it for constructing task hierarchies. We next describe the major steps of BRT approach.
## Bayesian Rose Trees
BRTs are based on a greedy probabilistic agglomerative approach to construct multi-branch hierarchies. In the beginning, each data point is regarded as a tree on its own: \(T_i = \{x_i\}\) where \(x_i\) is the feature vector of i-th data. For each step, the algorithm selects two trees \(T_i\) and \(T_j\) and merges them into a new tree \(T_m\). Unlike binary hierarchical clustering, BRT uses three possible merging operations, as shown in Figure [\[fig4\]](#fig4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig4"}:
- **Join**: \(T_m = {T_i, T_j}\), such that the tree \(T_m\) has two children now
- **Absorb**: \(T_m = {children(T_i) \cup T_j}\), i.e., the children of one tree gets absorbed into the other tree forming an absorbed tree with \(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2 children
- **Collapse**: \(T_m = {children(T_i) \cup children(T_j)}\), all the children of both the subtrees get combined together at the same level.
Specifically, in each step, the algorithm greedily finds two trees \(T_i\) and \(T_j\) to merge which maximize the ratio of probability: \[\frac{p(D_{m}|T_m)}{p(D_{i}|T_i)p(D_{j}|T_j)}\] where \(p(D_m|T_m)\) is the likelihood of data \(D_m\) given the tree \(T_m\), \(D_m\) is all the leaf data of \(T_m\), and \(D_m = D_i \cup D_j\). The probability \(p(D_m|T_m)\) is recursively defined on the children of \(T_m\): \[p(D_m | T_m) = \pi_{T_m} f(D_m) + (1-\pi_{T_m}) \prod_{T_i \in ch(T_m)} p(D_i|T_i)\] where \(f(D_m)\) is the marginal probability of the data \(D_m\) and \(\pi_{T_m}\) is the \"*mixing proportion*\". Intuitively, \(\pi_{T_m}\) is the prior probability that all the data in \(T_m\) is kept in one cluster instead of partitioned into sub-trees. In BRT, \(\pi_{T_m}\) is defined as: \[\pi_{T_m} = 1-(1-\gamma)^{n_{T_m}-1}\] where \(n_{T_m}\) is the number of children of \(T_m\), and \(0 \geq \gamma \leq 1\) is the hyperparameter to control the model. A larger \(\gamma\) leads to coarser partitions and a smaller \(\gamma\) leads to finer partitions. Table [1](#symbols){reference-type="ref" reference="symbols"} provides an overview of notations & symbols used throughout the paper.
## Building Task Hierarchies
We next describe our task hierarchy construction approach built on top of Bayesian Rose Trees. A tree node in our setting is comprised of a group of queries which potentially compose a search task, i.e. these are the set of queries that people tend to issue in order to achieve the task represented in the tree node. We define the task-subtask hierarchy recursively: T is a task if either T contains all the queries at its node (an atomic search task) or if T splits into children trees as \(T = \{T_1,T_2...,T_{n_T}\}\) where each of the children trees (\(T_i\)) are disjoint set of queries corresponding to the \(n_T\) subtasks associated with task \(T\). This allows us to consider trees as a nested collection of sets of queries defining our task-subtask hierarchical relation. To form nested hierarchies, we first need to model the query data. This corresponds to defining the marginal distribution of the data \(f(D_m)\) as defined in Equation 2. The marginal distribution of the query data (\(f(D_m)\)) helps us encapsulate insights about task level interdependencies among queries, which aid in constructing better task representations. The original BRT approach assumes that the data can be modeled by a set of binary features that follow the Bernoulli distribution. In other words, features (that represent the relationship/similarities between data points) are not weighted and can only be binary. Binary (0/1) relationships are too simplistic to model inter-query relationships; as a result, this major assumption fails to capture the semantic relationships between queries and is not suited for modeling query-task relations. To this end, we propose a novel query affinity model and to alleviate the binary feature assumption imposed by BRT, we propose a conjugate model of query affinities, which we describe next.
## Conjugate Model of Query Affinities {#taskaffinity}
A tree node in our setting is comprised of a group of queries which *potentially* belong to the same search task. The likelihood of a tree should encapsulate information about the different relationships which exists between queries. Our goal here is to make use of the rich information associated with queries and their result set available to compute the likelihood of a set of queries to belong to the same task. In order to do so, we propose a query affinity model which makes use of a number of different inter-query affinities to determine the tree likelihood function. We next describe the technique used to compute four broad categories of inter-query affinity and later describe the Gamma-Poisson conjugate model which makes use of these affinities to compute the marginal distribution of the data.\
**Query-term based Affinity (\(r^1\)):**\
Search queries catering to the same or similar informational needs tend to have similar query terms. We make use of this insight and capture query level affinities between a pair of queries. We make use of cosine similarity between the query term sets, the normalized edit distances between queries and the Jaccard Coefficient between query term sets.\ | {'timestamp': '2017-06-08T02:03:14', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01574', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01574'} |
# Introduction {#sec:Intro}
In the past decades many theoretical methods have been developed in the attempt to predict and rationalise molecular electronic structures. Coupled cluster approaches are amongst the most widespread reference methods and are based on the exponential *Ansatz* for the molecule's wavefunction. The unfavourable scaling of these methods, however, makes them unsuitable for large scale calculations or predictive assessments for a large number of molecular systems. In contrast to these well-established methods, many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) has emerged as a computational alternative for molecules. The computational scheme first proposed by Hedin, and summarised in (a-b), involves several quantities: starting with an initial guess for the Green's function (\(G\)) one determines the system's irreducible polarizability (\(\chi_0\)) and the screened interaction \(W\). These quantities alone fully specify the self-energy operator \(\Sigma\) in the first iteration of the scheme, which then produces an updated Green's function, as shown in panel (b). For later iterations the inclusion of vertex effects is in principle required through the vertex function \(\Lambda\). The main difficulty in including the vertex is that it involves additional diagrams at each step, since the vertex is formally generated by the functional derivative of the self-energy with respect to the Green's function. Exploiting exact functional relations can simplify the calculations only to a certain extent, and no purely numerical scheme can be implemented for the original method of Hedin. It is understandable then that the \(GW\) approximation (GWA) completely neglects the vertex, thus iteratively applying the scheme in -b. This approximation is justified when exchange and correlation effects are completely absent in the reference state and only for the first iteration of the scheme, *i.e.* when \(\Sigma_{\mathrm{xc}}=0\), as for the Hartree case. However, it has been widely used also on Hartree-Fock (HF) or density functional theory (DFT) starting points. Actual GWA calculations vary significantly in details. The most common approximation is to create the starting orbitals using standard density functional theory and perform a single shot \(G_0W_0\) calculation. This works well for extended systems, but for small molecules this approximation tends to yield underbound highest molecular orbitals (HOMO). One way to cure this problem is to perform the calculations self-consistently. An update of the quasi-particle (QP) energies alone produces what is now often called the ev-\(G_nW_0\) or the ev-\(G_nW_n\) schemes, if the updated eigenvalues are included only in the Green's function or also in the screened interaction, respectively. Fully self-consistent \(GW\) calculations require the calculation of the interacting Green's function \(G(\omega) = (\omega-T-V_{\rm{ext}}-\Sigma)^{-1}\), with \(T\) the kinetic energy operator and \(V_{\rm{ext}}\) the external potential generated by the atomic nuclei and \(\Sigma\) being the self-energy. The resulting quasi-particle equations involve an energy dependent non-Hermitian self-energy. To make this problem more manageable, quasi-particle self-consistent \(GW\) approaches have been devised that disregard the non-Hermitian component of the self-energy and approximate its energy dependence. Recent studies on selected organic molecules have shown that self-consistency significantly improves the quasi-particle energies. However, the HOMO is now on average too negative; in other words self-consistent approaches tend to over-bind the electrons and yield a too large ionization potential (IP). As we will discuss below the inclusion of the vertex cures this shortcoming already in the first iteration of the scheme.
{#Fig:Hedin width="12.5cm"}
Apart from the overestimation of the binding energies, self-consistency is also computationally fairly expensive, and other simple means to improve the QP energies have been considered as well. One is the admixture of exact exchange in the reference mean-field ground state calculation. From a fundamental point of view, this should certainly improve the occupied orbitals, since for the standard local and semi-local density functionals that are commonly used as starting point the exchange-correction potential does not properly decay like one over the distance from the nuclei . Also the HF one electron energies are closer to the final \(GW\) QP energies, so that an iterative solution of the \(GW\) equations should not be necessary. An elegant mean to achieve the correct \(1/r\) decay of the nuclear-electron potential is using long-range hybrid functionals, but standard hybrid functionals as well as Hartree-Fock starting points have been used as well. In the present work, we have also decided to use the HF reference point to initiate the \(GW\) calculations. The reasons for this choice are summarized below. (i) From a practical point of view, this choice obviously allows for a rather straightforward comparison with wavefunction based methods that usually rely on the HF reference point. Accordingly, we will use CCSD(T) reference data taken from the literature. (ii) There is evidence that HF theory is a reasonably accurate starting point for small molecules: it is well known that, because of the Brillouin condition in HF theory, single excited configurations only contribute in second order in the perturbative expansion of the exact wavefunction, whereas for Brückner orbitals their contribution is exactly zero to all orders. From a diagrammatic standpoint this translates into an identical cancellation of single excited determinants in lowest order for the ground state energy evaluated using either the HF or the Brückner orbitals. Since in localised systems the contribution of correlated higher order excitations is small, one can reasonably expect that the HF determinant has a large overlap with the exact many-body wavefunction, similarly to the Brückner orbitals. (iii) The main point of the present work is to investigate how important vertex corrections are. For the HF starting point, the vertex corrections can be evaluated exactly, as they are give by the functional derivative of the exchange potential with respect to the Green's function. Hence we can unambiguously study the effect of vertex corrections. This brings us back to a point already alluded to above. \(G_0W_0\)\@HF, as well as self-consistent \(GW\) place the HOMO at too negative binding energies, or in other words, the IP is too large. The reason for this is fairly simple. In the GWA---which implies that the random phase approximation is used to calculate the polarizability ---particle-hole ladder diagrams are not included. The resulting \(W\) underscreens the interaction between electrons because the energy to create an electron-hole pair is too large. This largely explains why the IP is overestimated. The second issue affecting the GWA stems from the so-called self-screening error. In the \(GW\) self-energy, one state can be occupied by two particles, since direct and exchange interactions are not treated on the same footing. This situation is reminiscent of the self-interaction problem that appears at the mean-field level in the Hartree theory. The inclusion of the exact exchange in the Hartree-Fock theory completely cures this shortcoming on the mean-field level but neglects correlation. Including the functional derivative of the exchange with respect to the Green's function in Hedin's equations also eliminates the problem on the level of correlations. To set the stage, we now summarize our computational approach. The initial step is a HF calculation for a set of molecules. We then calculate the standard \(G_0W_0\)\@HF QP energies for this set, and find as expected that this approximation overestimates the IP. We then present post-\(GW\) calculations for the same set of molecules. In these calculations, the vertex corrections are included and given by the functional derivative of the exchange potential \(\Sigma_\mathrm{x}\) with respect to the HF Green's function \(G(\omega) =(\omega-T-V_{\rm{ext}}-V_H-\Sigma_\mathrm{x})^{-1}\) (here \(V_H\) is the Hartree potential). The vertex is included either only in the polarizability (\(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\)) or in the polarizability and in the self-energy (\(G_0W_0\Gamma\)). In present work, only the diagonal components of the self-energy are calculated, and changes of the orbitals are concomitantly not considered, nor do we perform the calculations self-consistently, since this would in principle require a consistent update of the vertex as already emphasized above. The inclusion of the vertex in the polarizability is equivalent to calculating the polarizabilty using time-dependent Hartree-Fock, and the computational cost is also similar with both methods scaling like \(O(N^6)\). There are also formal similarities to the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) performed on top of a \(GW\) reference state. The latter method is commonly adopted for solid state systems, but has also been used to study the optical properties of molecular systems. To the best of our knowledge, vertex corrections have been routinely considered only for extended systems. For finite systems, calculations have been performed for atoms, for very simple molecules (within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation), or with the SOSEX, which approximates the vertex only in second order. A local vertex \(\Lambda_{\rm{LDA}}\) has also been used for a set of aromatic molecules, however, this simple two-point vertex behaves quite differently than the four-point many-body vertex used here. Among other things, the local approximation breaks fundamental self-energy symmetries and, albeit these effects are small for extended solids, they might be more relevant for very inhomogeneous systems such as molecules. The work is structured in the following manner. In we derive simple equations for the vertex corrected \(GW\), reducing the set of equations to three equations that are reminiscent of the equation of motion. Contrary to Hedin's equation we use a four-point notation. In we report a diagrammatic analysis of the self-energy thus generated. The computational details are given in , and our results are finally presented and discussed in , where we apply the \(GW\Gamma\) method perturbatively to a set of molecules.
# Theory {#sec:Theo}
## Hedin's equations {#sec:Hedin}
In principle, there are at least two complementary routes to improve on the MBPT approaches: either a self-consistent evaluation of the standard GWA or the inclusion of sub-leading diagrammatic contributions. Practical implementations have been directed primarely towards self-consistency (see for a discussion), whereas vertex corrections remain largely unaddressed, because of the high implementational as well as computational complexity. To present our computational approach we will rely on a four point notation, for instance used by Starke and Kresse, although in the present work we have decided to rearrange the indices to more easily connect with the available standard literature. Also the specific succession of indices adopted here is easier to memorise. Using a four index notation Hedin's equations can be written as \[\begin{aligned}
G(1,2) & =& G_0(1,2) + G_0(1,3) \Sigma_{\mathrm{xc}}(3,4) G(4,2) \label{equ:h1} \\ \Sigma_{\mathrm{xc}}(1,2) &= & \mathrm{i} \,G(5,6) \Gamma(1,5,3,4) W(3,4,2,6) \label{equ:h2} \\ \Pi_0(1,2,3,4) & = &-G(1,5) G(6,2) \Gamma(5,6,3,4) \label{equ:h3} \\ W(1,2,3,4) & =& V(1,2,3,4) + \label{equ:h4} \\ & + &V(1,2,5,6) \Pi_0(5,6,7,8) W(7,8,3,4) \nonumber \\ \Gamma(1,2,3,4)& = &\delta(1,3)\delta(2,4) + \label{equ:h5} \\ &-& \mathrm{i} \, I(1,2,5,6) G(5,7) G(8,6) \Gamma(7,8,3,4) \nonumber \end{aligned}\] In these equations, integrals over repeated indices are assumed. We note that if two four-point quantities are multiplied, for instance, \(\Pi_0 W\) in Eq. ([\[equ:h4\]](#equ:h4){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:h4"}), then the integral is always over the two intermediate indices, in the equation below 5 and 6, and the order is easy to memorise: \[\label{equ:matrixmul} A(1,2,3,4) = \int \Pi_0(1,2,5,6) W(5,6,3,4) \, d5 \, d6.\] The advantage of using a four point notation is the following. In Hedin's equations a numeral, for instance \(1\), corresponds necessarily to a space-time and spin point \(1=({\bf r}_1, t_1, \sigma_1)\); Hedin's original equations do not apply in orbital space or momentum space. In the four point notation above, however, one can perform a unitary transformation of the position coordinate to reciprocal space or to any set of orthogonal orbitals without changing the equations. The slight disadvantage of the present ordering of the indices is that the first index and the fourth index in each four point object transform like covariant coordinates (transformed by say \(U\)), whereas the second and third indices transform like contra-variant coordinates (transformed by \(U^\dagger\)). Before continuing we briefly reiterate the meaning of the individual objects. The four-point Coulomb interaction in space-time coordinates is \(V(1,2,3,4)= \delta(1,2) \delta(3,4) \delta(t_1, t_4) v(\mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_4)\) generalising the usual two-point counterpart \(v(\mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_4)=\frac{1}{|\mathbf{r}_1-\mathbf{r}_4|}\). \(G_0(1,2)\) is the Hartree Green's function, generated by the corresponding Hartree self-energy: \(\Sigma_0(1,2)=\) \(V_H(1,2)=\) \(\mathrm{i} \delta(1,2) \delta(t_1,t_3) [v(\mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_3) G(3,3^+)]\) in space-time coordinates, \(\Sigma_{\mathrm{xc}}(1,2)\) is the self-energy including exchange as well as correlation terms. \(\Pi_0\) is the irreducible polarization (propagator); it can not be divided into two individual polarization propagators by cutting a single Coulomb line \(V\). \(W\) is the screened interaction summing the Coulomb interactions to infinite order. Finally \(\Gamma\) is the four-point vertex, which is completely specified by the kernel \(I\): \[\label{eq:kern} I(1,2,3,4) = \frac{\delta \, \Sigma_{\mathrm{xc}}(1,2) }{\delta\, G(3,4)}.\] There is an alternative way to write these equations that avoids the vertex altogether. We first introduce an auxiliary independent two-particle propagator \(L_0(1,2,3,4)=-G(1,3)G(4,2)\). This allows to rewrite Eqs. ([\[equ:h3\]](#equ:h3){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:h3"}) and ([\[equ:h5\]](#equ:h5){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:h5"}) as \[\begin{aligned}
\Pi_0(1,2,3,4) & = & L_0(1,2,5,6) \Gamma(5,6,3,4) \nonumber \\ \ \Gamma(1,2,3,4)& = &\delta(1,3)\delta(2,4) + \nonumber \\ &+& \mathrm{i} \, I(1,2,5,6) L_0(5,6,7,8) \Gamma(7,8,3,4). \nonumber \end{aligned}\] We can now combine both equations to a single equation \[\label{equ:pi0} \Pi_0 = L_0 + L_0 (\mathrm{i} \, I) \Pi_0 \quad\leftrightarrow \quad\Pi_0^{-1} = L_0^{-1}-\mathrm{i} \, I.\] Here we have suppressed the indices and the matrix multiplications need to be done according to the rule stated above (Eq. [\[equ:matrixmul\]](#equ:matrixmul){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:matrixmul"}). For the inversion, it is understood that the first two and last two indices of each four point quantity are combined to a super index and the matrices are inverted using the two super indices as row and column indices. Likewise, we can introduce the full polarization propagator \[\label{equ:pi} \Pi = \Pi_0 + \Pi_0 V \Pi \quad\leftrightarrow \quad\Pi^{-1} = \Pi_0^{-1}-V.\] It is a simple matter to see that these two equations can be further combined into a single equation, reading \[\label{equ:pifinal} \Pi = L_0 + L_0 (V+ \mathrm{i} \, I) \Pi \leftrightarrow\Pi^{-1} = L_0^{-1}-\mathrm{i} \, I-V.\] The proof is most easily done inspecting the right hand inverted Dyson like equations in the previous three equations. Eq. ([\[equ:pifinal\]](#equ:pifinal){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:pifinal"}) is precisely the polarization propagator as calculated by means of the "Bethe-Salpeter equation" (BSE) in most solid state codes. In fact, in the preceding lines, we have backtracked the calculations performed by Starke and Kresse, where Hedin's equations were derived from the equation of motion and the BSE. We can now proceed with \(W\) and the self-energy. By expanding the right hand side of Eq. ([\[equ:h4\]](#equ:h4){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:h4"}) to infinite order in \(V\) one can identify \(\Pi\) and rewrite Eq. ([\[equ:h4\]](#equ:h4){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:h4"}) as \[\label{eq:W} W = V + V \Pi V.\] The final issue is to rewrite Eq. ([\[equ:h2\]](#equ:h2){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:h2"}), specifically the four point term \(\Gamma W = \Gamma(1,2,3,4) W(3,4,5,6)\) such that it involves only the already calculated polarization propagators. Using Eq. ([\[eq:W\]](#eq:W){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:W"}) for \(W\) and inserting the vertex from Eq. ([\[equ:h5\]](#equ:h5){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:h5"}), we obtain: \[\begin{split} \Gamma W & = ( 1-(\mathrm{i} I) L_0-(\mathrm{i} I) L_0 (\mathrm{i} I) L_0 +...) (V + V \Pi V ) \nonumber \\ & = ( 1 + (\mathrm{i} I) \Pi_0) (V + V \Pi V ) \\ & = V + V \Pi V + (\mathrm{i} I) (\Pi_0 +\Pi_0 V \Pi ) V \\ & = V + V \Pi V + (\mathrm{i} I) \Pi V = V + (V +\mathrm{i} I) \Pi V. \end{split}\] From the first to the second line we have used Eq. ([\[equ:pi0\]](#equ:pi0){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:pi0"}), and from the third to the fourth line we have used Eq. ([\[equ:pi\]](#equ:pi){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:pi"}). In summary, we can rewrite Hedin's equation in the much more compact form \[\begin{aligned}
\Pi & = & L_0 + L_0 (V+ \mathrm{i} \, I) \Pi \label{eq:PiBSE} \\ \Sigma_{\mathrm{xc}} & =& \mathrm{i} \, G \Big( V + (V +\mathrm{i} I) \Pi V \Big ) \label{equ:GWGamma} \\ G & =& G_0 + G_0 \Sigma_{\mathrm{xc}} G, \label{equ:greens} \end{aligned}\] where the contraction of the two-point Green's function and a four-point quantity is here defined as \[\Sigma_\mathrm{x}(1,3) =\mathrm{i} (GV)(1,3) = \int G(2,4) V (1,2,3,4) d 2 \, d 4.\] In these equations the somewhat arbitrary distinction between the Coulomb kernel \(V\) and the remaining interaction kernel \(\mathrm{i} I\) has been dropped. These equations are essentially equivalent to the compact equations given by Starke and Kresse but have been derived here from Hedin's equations instead of the more fundamental equation of motion. We note that the same equation for the self-energy can be also found in Ref. (albeit without derivation) and is seemingly common knowledge in quantum field theoretical publications. A few comments are in place. As already emphasized, \(\Pi\) in Eq. ([\[eq:PiBSE\]](#eq:PiBSE){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PiBSE"}) is the polarization propagator (or polarizability) that many solid state BSE codes calculate. It describes how test charges are screened by the electronic system, hence it is often referred to as test-charge test-charge (tc-tc) polarizability. The self-energy Eq. ([\[equ:GWGamma\]](#equ:GWGamma){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:GWGamma"}) describes the effects of the many-body system on an added or removed electron, and Eq. ([\[equ:greens\]](#equ:greens){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:greens"}) is the related Green's function. The first term on the right hand side of Eq. ([\[equ:GWGamma\]](#equ:GWGamma){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:GWGamma"}) is just the exchange potential (\(GV\)), whereas the second term describes, in principle, all correlation effects. If \(iI\) is neglected in the self-energy ([\[equ:GWGamma\]](#equ:GWGamma){reference-type="ref" reference="equ:GWGamma"}) but included in ([\[eq:PiBSE\]](#eq:PiBSE){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PiBSE"}) the approximation is commonly referred to as \(GW^{\rm{tc-tc}}\). Although this set of equations is in principle exact, approximations need to be made for the interaction kernel \(I\) specified in . In our case, we perform calculations perturbatively on the Hartree-Fock reference state, *i.e.* we start the Hedin scheme with the sum of the Hartree (\(\Sigma_0\)) and exchange self-energy (\(\Sigma_\mathrm{x}\)): \(\Sigma= \Sigma_0 + \Sigma_\mathrm{x}\). Then the interaction kernel is simply the functional derivative of the the exchange self-energy \(\Sigma_\mathrm{x}\) and thus explicitly given by \[\mathrm{i} I(1,2,3,4) =-\delta(2,4) \delta(1,3) \delta(t_1, t_2) v(\mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_2),\] where \(v( \mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_2)\) is the bare Coulomb interaction between particles. The polarization propagator is then just the polarizability of time-dependent Hartree-Fock . The approximation employed in this study is also related to the random phase approximation with exchange (RPAx) first proposed by Szabo and Ostlund. There has been a recent revival in interest for the RPAx, however, previous studies have focused on the evaluation of correlation energies, rather than the self-energy considered here. Finally, we comment on the use of the \(GW\) reference state instead of the Hartree-Fock starting point employed here. For the \(GW\) reference state, the interaction kernel is given by the functional derivative of the \(GW\) self-energy with respect to the Green's function. This makes the interaction kernel more complicated. Specifically, (i) \(W\) is frequency dependent, and (ii) since \(W\) itself depends on the Green's function, the derivatives of \(W\) with respect to \(G\) should be accounted for. The resulting diagrams are sometimes refereed to as "butterfly" diagrams. A common approximation is to neglect the dependence of \(W\) on the Green's functions, and to approximate the frequency dependence of \(W\) by an instantaneous interactions. The most common approximation for the interaction kernel is \[\label{eq:BSEkern} \mathrm{i} I(1,2,3,4) =-\delta(2,4) \delta(1,3) \delta(t_1, t_2) w(\mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_2),\] with \(w(\mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_2)\) being the random phase approximation (RPA) screened Coulomb interaction at \(\omega=0\). These approximations are also commonly employed in solid state BSE codes, and our present \(GW\Gamma\) code can be adopted to this case. We will report on such calculations in forthcoming publications.
## Bethe-Salpeter equation {#sec:BSE}
As already emphasized above, we treat all the interactions as instantaneous in the present case. For the Hartree-Fock reference point this is exact, but it constitutes an approximation, if one were to start from the self-energy of the \(GW\) approximation. In full generality, the BSE can be Fourier transformed into the frequency domain and its kernel becomes a function of three independent frequency variables \(I=I(\omega,\omega',\tilde{\omega})\), with the screened interaction carrying a frequency dependence of \(\omega'-\tilde{\omega}\). Using an instantaneous interaction obviously yields a kernel \(I\) that does not depend on the frequency, since the Fourier transformation of a \(\delta\)-function in time is a constant in frequency space. More detailed discussions can be found in literature. Then, in an orbital representation the full kernel \(V +\mathrm{i} I\) is given by the matrix elements of the matrices \(\mathbf{A'}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\): \[\begin{aligned}
A'_{iajb}=& \langle aj|V|ib \rangle-\langle aj|V|bi \rangle, \label{eq:RR}\\ B_{iajb}=& \langle ab|V|ij \rangle-\langle ab|V|ji \rangle.\label{eq:RA} \end{aligned}\] The BSE reduces to a generalised eigenvalue problem , where the eigenvalues \(\Omega_{\lambda}\) correspond to the optical transition energies, and the matrix \(\mathbf{A}\) is formed from \(\mathbf{A'}\) adding the independent particle energy differences \(\Delta E_{ia}=\epsilon_a-\epsilon_i\) to the diagonal elements: \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:BSE} \begin{pmatrix} \mathbf{A} & \mathbf{B}\\ \mathbf{B}^* & \mathbf{A}^* \end{pmatrix} \left | \begin{matrix} \mathbf{X}_\lambda\\ \mathbf{Y}_\lambda \end{matrix} \right \rangle = \Omega_{\lambda} \left | \begin{matrix} \mathbf{X}_\lambda\\ \mathbf{Y}_\lambda \end{matrix} \right \rangle. \end{aligned}\] At the \(\Gamma-\)point the matrix elements of \(\mathbf{A}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) can be chosen to be real-valued and since the matrix \(\mathbf{A}\) is Hermitian and \(\mathbf{B}\) is symmetric, the generalised eigenvalue problem (EVP) above can be recast as an Hermitian EVP, for which standard solvers are available. A concise expression for the resulting polarisation propagator's spectral representation reads: \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:PiSR1} \mathbf{\Pi} (\omega) = \mathbf{Z} \left ( \omega-\mathbf{\Omega} \right )^{-1} \mathbf{\Delta}\mathbf{Z}^\dagger, \end{aligned}\] with the following definitions for the matrices: \[\begin{aligned}
\mathbf{Z}= \begin{pmatrix} \mathbf{X} & \mathbf{Y}^* \\ \mathbf{Y} & \mathbf{X}^* \end{pmatrix}, \mathbf{\Delta}= \begin{pmatrix} \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{0} \\ \mathbf{0} & \mathbf{-1} \end{pmatrix}, \mathbf{\Omega}= \begin{pmatrix} \mathrm{diag}\{\Omega_\lambda \} & \mathbf{0} \\ \mathbf{0} & \mathrm{diag}\{-\Omega_\lambda \} \end{pmatrix}. \end{aligned}\] The matrix \(\mathbf{Z}\) contains all the individual eigenvectors \(\mathbf{X}_{\lambda}\) and \(\mathbf{Y}_\lambda\), similarly the matrix \(\mathbf{\Omega}\) includes resonant and antiresonant transition energies; the transition energies for the resonant and antiresonant branch are identical (apart from a sign) as a consequence of the downfolding of the original BSE into an Hermitian EVP. For definitiveness we choose \(\Omega_\lambda >0\). Since the matrix \(\omega-\mathbf{\Omega}\) is diagonal in the orbital representation, it can be commuted across; the resulting product \(\mathbf{Z} \mathbf{\Delta} \mathbf{Z}^\dagger\) can be decomposed into the difference of two matrices: \[\begin{aligned}
\mathbf{Z \Delta Z}^\dagger = \begin{pmatrix} \mathbf{XX}^* & \mathbf{XY}^* \\ \mathbf{YX}^* & \mathbf{YY}^* \end{pmatrix}- \begin{pmatrix} \mathbf{Y^*Y} & \mathbf{Y^*X} \\ \mathbf{X^*Y} & \mathbf{X^*X} \end{pmatrix}. \end{aligned}\] The resonant and antiresonant contributions can be more easily singled out by re-writing the matrices above as an external product of the eigenstates of . The polarisation propagator then reads: \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:PiSR2} \Pi(\omega) = \sum_{\lambda} \frac{ \left |\begin{matrix} \mathbf{X}_\lambda \\ \mathbf{Y}_\lambda \end{matrix} \right \rangle \langle \mathbf{X}_\lambda^* \mathbf{Y}_\lambda^*| }{\omega-\Omega_\lambda}- \frac{\left |\begin{matrix} \mathbf{Y}_\lambda^* \\ \mathbf{X}_\lambda^* \end{matrix} \right \rangle \langle \mathbf{Y}_\lambda \mathbf{X}_\lambda| }{\omega + \Omega_\lambda}. \end{aligned}\] This expression can now be inserted into to give the greater and lesser components of the correlation self-energy, corresponding to the propagation of a particle (\(p\)) and a hole (\(h\)), respectively: \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:SigmaR} \langle n | \Sigma_p (\omega) | n \rangle & =\sum_\lambda \langle n |\mathbf{V} |\mathbf{X}_\lambda + \mathbf{Y}_\lambda \rangle \langle \mathbf{AX}_\lambda + \mathbf{BY}_\lambda| n \rangle \left ( f(\epsilon_n)-1 \right ) \delta \left ( \epsilon_n + \Omega_\lambda-\omega \right ) \\ \label{eq:SigmaA} \langle n | \Sigma_h (\omega)| n \rangle & =\sum_\lambda \langle n |\mathbf{V} |\mathbf{X}_\lambda + \mathbf{Y}_\lambda \rangle \langle \mathbf{AY}_\lambda + \mathbf{BX}_\lambda| n \rangle f(\epsilon_n) \delta \left ( \epsilon_n-\Omega_\lambda-\omega \right ). \end{aligned}\] \(f(\epsilon_n)\) in the previous equations is the occupancy for the energy level \(\epsilon_n\) and the summation goes over the set of particle-hole excitations \(\lambda\). The composite index \(\lambda\) is constructed by considering all possible combinations of the single particle indices \((i,a)\), with \(i\) and \(a\) belonging to the occupied and unoccupied orbital manifold; in the following \(n\) represents a generic orbital. The total correlation part of the self-energy is then obtained by taking the Hilbert transform of the two components: \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:Sigmac} \langle n | \Sigma_c (\omega) | n \rangle & = \int \frac{d\omega'}{2} \frac{\langle n | \Sigma_p (\omega')-\Sigma_h (\omega')| n\rangle }{\omega-\omega' +\mathrm{i} \eta ~\mathrm{sgn}(\omega-\mu)}. \end{aligned}\] Expressions in Eqs. ([\[eq:SigmaR\]](#eq:SigmaR){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SigmaR"}) and ([\[eq:SigmaA\]](#eq:SigmaA){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SigmaA"}) reduce to the usual RPA limit, if the exchange term in \(\mathbf{A'}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) is omitted.
## Diagrammatic analysis {#sec:2bleCounting}
We start our diagrammatic analysis with the lowest order expressions: these can be obtained by replacing the fully interacting polarisation propagator \(\Pi\) in with the non-interacting counterpart \(L_0\). The corresponding diagrams are shown in . In the top row of we are reporting the correlation contributions in that stem from the term labelled with \(V\), in the bottom row the terms generated by the kernel \(\mathrm{i} I\) are shown. The two columns portray the different orientations of the intermediate state \(n\) with respect to the incoming state \(n'\) (which in the diagram is represented by the external legs which have not been amputated for clarity): in the left column \(n\) and \(n'\) belong to the same manifold (they are both either occupied or unoccupied), in the right column \(n\) and \(n'\) belong to different manifolds. It is obvious, by inspecting the diagrams, that the two contributions (in the top and bottom row, called respectively bubble and exchange in the following) are non equivalent in lowest order and that by cutting a particle-hole pair the diagram does not break up into disjoint pieces. This lower order contribution results in the MP2 self-energy, evaluated for instance in Ref. for extended systems.
{#Fig:SE_2ndO width="7.5cm"}
If we now switch on the interaction between particles and holes in the polarisation propagator we obtain additional classes of diagrams, as shown in in third order in the interaction, *i.e.* setting \(\Pi=L_0 (V+\mathrm{i} I) L_0\). Two of the third order diagrams belong to the same class as their second order counterparts, these are shown in the left column of . Additionally, the \"mixed contributions\" shown in the right column represent the insertion of an exchange interaction in the bubble term (top) and the insertion of a bubble in the exchange diagram (bottom). The polarisation propagator, however, is obtained by a resummation to infinite order of the corresponding diagrams *via* the solution of the BSE. These are represented in , where we are showing both orientations for the intermediate particle for completeness. Starting from the top left diagram in it is easy to identify an infinite resummation of this class with the usual RPA approximation, where the so-called bubble diagrams are summed up; this translates into a screened interaction (denoted by a double wavy line) showing up in the corresponding diagram in . Likewise, an infinite number of bubble insertions in the exchange diagram of (bottom right) returns an additional screened line. The infinite resummation of the exchange contributions (top right and bottom left in ), on the other hand, takes into account the interaction between particles and holes in the polarisation propagator and this is represented in by a shaded triangle. We should now point out that in the final self-energy diagrams, the resummation to infinite order of the polarisation propagator generates a frequency dependent, dynamical screened interaction vertex (pictorially defined at the bottom of ). Considering the resulting diagrams it is easy to see that they result in proper, irreducible self-energy insertions: the presence of bubble and exchange contributions in the kernel assures that two topologically distinct classes are obtained (shown in the top and middle row of ) and that for either class there is no external polarisation insertion. As it was mentioned in the introduction, the iteration to self-consistency modifies the diagrammatic structure presented up to this point (see -a). This is one reason why we do not consider self-consistency in the present work. As explained at the end of Sec. [2.1](#sec:Hedin){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Hedin"}, by adopting some further approximations, it is however possible to maintain the simple algebraic structure and extend the present approach to \(GW\Gamma\) calculations on top of a \(GW\) reference state.
{#Fig:SE_3rdO width="7.5cm"}
{#Fig:SE_infO width="9.0cm"}
Finally, we mention that the exclusion of the exchange diagrams in the self-energy can be obtained by formally replacing the electron in the intermediate state \(n\) with a classical test-charge. In what follows we will refer to this level of theory as to the \(GW^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) approximation. This approximation neglects the \(\mathrm{i} I\) term in , but includes it in .
# Computational procedure {#sec:Comp}
Calculations were performed on a subset of molecules studied in Ref.. For consistency we adopted the same molecular geometries as obtained in Ref. at the MP2/6-31G(d) level of theory. The initial step was always a self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculation. Since the solution of the Bethe-Salpeter equation is very demanding if many virtual orbitals are included, we used natural orbitals to represent the unoccupied states. In our procedure we roughly followed the work of Grüneis *et al.*, but instead of using the MP2 density matrix, we calculated the RPA density matrix using the cubically scaling \(GW\) code. We then diagonalized the virtual-virtual sub-block and sorted the natural orbitals by their occupancy. In this step, the number of orbitals is reduced by a factor four compared to the plane wave basis set size specified by the cutoff \(E_c\) and reported in . We note that the occupied (\(N_{\rm{occ}}\)) as well as few unoccupied states are not modified but kept fixed at the level of the HF canonical orbitals. The number of unoccupied orbitals that are kept fixed at their Hartree-Fock level is set to 0.8\(\times N_{\rm{occ}}\). By comparing calculations using all canonical orbitals and natural orbitals for selected systems, we found that the reduction of the unoccupied states introduces errors that are smaller than about 10 meV. After determining the natural orbitals, the Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian is again diagonalized using the natural orbitals as basis [^1]. Using this basis, the Bethe-Salpeter equation is solved for the polarization propagator, and the diagonal elements of the self-energy are calculated in the orbital basis. The self-energy is evaluated on the real frequency axis sampled with a uniform grid of 0.1 eV spacing. The complex broadening is set to twice the frequency spacing and the resulting self-energy \(\langle n |\Sigma_c(\omega) |n \rangle\) (shifted by the kinetic, ionic, Hartree and Fock exchange energy contributions) is piecewise linearly interpolated in each interval to determine the quasi-particle energies as the intersection with the bisector line as shown in . The quasi-particle shifts (\(\delta(\varepsilon^{\rm{QP}})\) in the following) are then obtained by subtracting the corresponding mean-field single particle energies. To minimise the impact of image charges due to the finite simulation box, the Hartree-Fock calculations were repeated increasing the simulation cell up to 25 Å in each linear dimension and then correcting for the residual local potential present at the edge of the cell. The quasi-particle calculations were performed in a smaller simulation box (8 Å in size). The volume dependence of the quasi-particle energies has been carefully analysed in our previous publication and it was found to be neglible for the systems considered here. The quality of this approximation can be assessed for the case of \(G_0W_0\) for the HF reference state by comparison with the localised basis set calculations in Ref. and reported in . The final quasi-particle energies were obtained by adding to the cell size converged (HF) single particle energies the quasi-particle shifts and the basis set corrections, according to the expression: \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:eQP} \left. \varepsilon_n^{\rm{QP}} \right |_\infty = \left. \varepsilon_n^{\rm{HF}}\right |_N + \delta(\varepsilon_n^{\rm{QP}} ) + C_N(\varepsilon_n^{\rm{QP}}). \end{aligned}\] The basis set correction \(C_N\) is defined as: \(C_N(\varepsilon)=\left. \varepsilon \right |_\infty-\left. \varepsilon \right |_N\), where the subscripts indicate the number of natural orbitals (\(N\)) or the extrapolated value (\(\infty\)). In the next section it will be shown how the interplay of quasi-particle energy shift and the basis set correction affects the final quasi-particle levels. One of the advantages of plane wave basis sets is the full control of the basis set completeness by specifying their kinetic energy cutoff \(E_c\). [^2] To estimate the basis set convergence, we increased \(E_c\) by a factor 1.3 and 1.5 beyond the value specified in and extrapolated assuming that the QP shifts converge like one over the basis set size.
# Results and discussion {#sec:Res}
In this section, we apply the computational scheme presented above to a subset of the molecules considered in Refs.. As a first check on the accuracy of the computational procedure we compare in the HOMO quasi-particle energies at the \(G_0W_0\) level of theory with those obtained by Bruneval and Marques with Gaussian type orbitals (GTOs) using cc-pVQZ basis sets. We immediately point out that we expect differences of the order of 100 meV between PW and GTO \(GW\) results. First, pseudopotentials can introduce errors and second the GTO results were not extrapolated to the complete basis set limit. Concerning the pseudpotential error, we know from previous work that flourine containing compounds are affected most strongly with errors of about \(\approx\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100 meV, owing to the strong degree of localisation for 2\(p\) electrons. With the non-normconserving PAW potential used here, we somewhat underestimate the degree of localization for flourine, as explained elsewhere. Concerning the basis set extrapolation of the GTO results, its convergence was studied in Ref. up to the \"correlation-consistent\" pV5Z basis set for the specific case of CO; the HOMO energy difference between this basis set and the quadruple zeta employed for the calculations of all the remaining molecules is about \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}70 meV. Since the error decays like \(1/C_n^3\), where \(C_n\) is the cardinal number (*i.e.* four for quadruple basis sets), the quadruple zeta basis set results reported in Ref. are expected to have errors of the order of \(2 \times 70~\)meV\(\approx 140~\)meV. The difference between our plane-wave (PW) results and the GTO ones is typically comparable with this order of magnitude, with the exception of two outliers: CS and P\(_{\text{2}}\). For CS we observe that in going from the HF to the \(G_0W_0\) level there is a rearrangement of the orbital energies, with the HOMO-1 and the HOMO exchanging their positions. We can therefore speculate that the value reported in the literature refers to a lower lying quasi-particle level that corresponds to the HOMO orbital at the mean-field level. For this reason we have included also this quasi-particle energy in for comparison. On the other hand, for P\(_{\text{2}}\), we notice how the finite box effects are particularly strong in this case, with a downward shift exceeding 1 eV for the HF HOMO level as the cell edge is increased from 8 to 25 Å. It is, however difficult to draw a solid conclusion on the origin of the observed mismatch, also considering that in Ref. P\(_{\text{2}}\) fails to follow any of the trends observed for the remaining molecules.
We then consider the impact of the vertex on the self-energy and on the quasi-particle energy for the HOMO level. This level is defined as the highest occupied orbital in the (post-)\(GW\) approximation. This coincides with the HF HOMO level for all molecular systems except CS and N\(_{\text{2}}\), for which it corresponds to the HOMO-1 level in the HF approximation. Furthermore, the inclusion of the ladder diagrams only in the polarisation propagator produces the so-called \(G_0W_0\) with test charge-test charge interactions (labelled \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) in the following). In terms of the diagrams involved, the latter approximation can be obtained from the more general \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) by omitting the exchange diagrams in the self-energy (*e.g.* those in the bottom row in Figs. [2](#Fig:SE_2ndO){reference-type="ref" reference="Fig:SE_2ndO"}-[4](#Fig:SE_infO){reference-type="ref" reference="Fig:SE_infO"} above). For this level of theory we observe the same level alignment between the quasi-particle HOMO level and HF reference as in the \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) calculations, with the sole exception of SiO. For this molecule there is a level crossing as in the case of CS and N\(_{\text{2}}\). The inclusion of the ladder diagrams in the polarizability is reasonable from a physical standpoint: it introduces an interaction between the \"virtual\" particle and hole that are generated as a response of the many-body system to the introduction of a test charge (excitonic effects). In turn, ladder diagrams increase the screening in the many-body system, since an interacting electron-hole pair requires less energy to be generated than a non-interacting pair. This effect will be present in both the \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) and the \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\), and it shows on the resulting self-energy as a shift of its resonances to higher (lower) energies below (above) the Fermi level (conventionally located mid-gap between the HOMO and LUMO levels). contrasts the HOMO self-energy for all approximations considered in two representative systems (PH\(_\text{3}\) and CO): in both cases, there is a reduction of the frequency interval devoid of resonances when the polarizability includes ladder diagrams. Consistently the intersection with the bisector line \(y=\omega\) occurs in the \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) approximation at higher (less negative) energies, thus reducing the underscreening error of \(G_0W_0\), as shown in . Not surprisingly, the most sizable changes occur for molecules whose highest occupied orbital (HOMO) has a non-bonding or anti-bonding character, *i.e.* that has a larger overlap with the LUMO and higher unoccupied states. For instance: H\(_\text{2}\)O, H\(_\text{2}\)O\(_\text{2}\), HF, CO\(_\text{2}\), NH\(_\text{3}\), have quasi-particle \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) shifts more positive than the \(G_0W_0\) values by more than 600 meV as reported in .
:::
On the other hand, in the \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) approximation (shown in by dashed-dotted lines) there is another effect at play: the inclusion of exchange diagrams in the self-energy redistributes the spectral weight of its resonances across the frequency range. This effect, for the vast majority of systems considered here (the only exceptions being the unsaturated hydrocarbons C\(_{\text{2}}\)H\(_{\text{4}}\) and C\(_{\text{2}}\)H\(_{\text{2}}\)), counteracts the upshift of \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) in comparison with \(G_0W_0\) quasi-particle energies. In particular the effect is more pronounced for the set of molecules that showed larger quasi-particle shifts from \(G_0W_0\) to \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) (see ). This comparison can be systematically carried out as shown in for the whole range of molecules considered: the impact of vertex corrections in the self-energy, *i.e.* in going from the \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) to the \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) approximation, is system dependent. In particular, systems with a more ionic character (for instance fluorides and chlorides) or with unsaturated chemical bonds (*e.g.* N\(_{\text{2}}\), CO, CO\(_{\text{2}}\)) will have the electron density rather localised around the more electronegative element or in the bonding region respectively. As electrons become more localised correlations among them become pivotal and necessitate the inclusion of the vertex at the self-energy level for an accurate description. Comparison with previous literature is not straightforward. Our observations are in contrast with the well-established behaviour of the local vertex in the \(GW \Lambda_{\rm{LDA}}\) approximation, which results in a rigid shift of the quasi-particle energies, regardless of the system's details. \(GW\Gamma\) calculations have also been reported by Shirley and Martin for neutral atoms and ions. Specifically, it has been reported that in ionized atoms the importance of exchange effects in the polarisability exceeds that of correlation effects in the self-energy, whereas for (neutral) atoms correlation effects in the self-energy are more relevant. With the very diverse systems considered here, we can not substantiate this trend. Now we evaluate the basis set corrections for the various levels of theory. We notice these values are consistenly smaller for \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) than for the \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) level of theory (see the finite basis quasi-particle levels and the extrapolated counterparts in ). This observation can be rationalised with a similar diagrammatic analysis as carried out for the paramagnetic electron gas. The argument can be concisely restated as follows: in lowest order there is a cancellation between the bubble and the exchange diagrams in the self-energy (see top and bottom row in ) because of the sign rule for fermionic loops that assigns a different sign to the two classes of diagrams. This cancellation is only partial in second order because there are twice more ways to assign a spin variable to each propagator line in the bubble diagram than there are for the exchange diagram (this is a consequence of the spin conservation at each interaction line). From these considerations the linear extrapolation of the quasi-particle energy will have a smaller slope by a factor \(\frac{1}{2}\) if the exchange diagrams in the self-energy are included. The inclusion of higher order diagrams clearly partially invalidates the previous arguments, since already in third order there are exchange type diagrams that feature the same number of fermionic loops as the bubble diagram (see bottom right). In general terms, we can however still expect a faster convergence over the number of orbitals for the \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) level of theory in comparison with the \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) case. This turns out to be the case for the vast majority of the systems considered here. The faster convergence for the \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) results can be seen in for CO and PH\(_\textrm{3}\). Finally, we can compare the resulting basis set extrapolated quasi-particle energies with the CCSD(T) results provided in. We reiterate that this comparison is somewhat problematic, since basis set incompleteness errors were not included in the coupled cluster results, and they are estimated to be over the order of 100 to 150 meV, as already elaborated above. Since CCSD(T) calculations also include exchange diagrams (as all interactions are antisymmetrised) we expect CCSD(T) to have a similar convergence rate as \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) and not as \(G_0W_0\). Neglecting these corrections, it is clear that the standard \(G_0W_0\)\@HF yields much too large IP's. The \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) approximation significantly improves on these results, with only few outliers with an error exceeding 300 meV. These outliers are two polar molecules, with much too small IP, namely HF and LiH, as well as CS, CO and N\(_\text{2}\) where the IP is still way too large. However, the \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) approximation is not a systematic approximation, since it includes vertex correction in the polarizability only but neglects them in the self-energy. If we keep in mind, that basis set converged CCSD(T) calculations will result in more negative HOMO energies (about \(-100\) meV to \(-150\) meV), this could possibly improve agreement between \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) and CCSD(T) and worsen the \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) results. The effect of the vertex in the self-energy is to systematically bring the extrapolated IP again above the CCSD(T) reference values . Generally, the \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) IP's lie between the \(G_0W_0\) and \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) values, which is in agreement with the general assumptions in literature. Exceptions to this trend are the unsaturated hydrocarbons, SiH\(_\text{4}\) and HCN, whose IP's, accidentally, reproduce the CCSD(T) values quite well. It is interesting to comment on the biggest outliers in . These are N\(_\text{2}\), CO and CS. A previous study has established the strong dependence on the used orbitals for carbon monoxide and the nitrogen dimer. Indeed, if full self-consistency is achieved (with the update of the initial Hartree-Fock orbitals), the resulting IP's are reduced by an excess of 0.8 eV. Unfortunately, similar studies have not been carried out for CS, however we expect a similar behaviour for this system, given the similarities in electronic structures. Therefore, for these molecules we expect that an update of the orbitals, or at least of the orbital's energies, more than the inclusion of the vertex will be relevant for an estimate of their IP's. The mean absolute deviation from the coupled cluster values for the remaining molecules in the set is 0.21 eV for \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) and 0.15 eV for \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\), scoring a marked improvement in comparison with the \(G_0W_0\) deviation (0.46 eV). We believe that inclusion of basis set corrections in the CCSD(T) results would improve the agreement between \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) and CCSD(T) even further, since this would increase the CCSD(T) IP values by the already quoted 100-150 meV moving them closer to the \(G_0W_0\Gamma\). Obviously this correction would worsen the agreement between CCSD(T) and \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\), which is to be expected, since \(G_0W_0^{\rm{tc-tc}}\) is not a well balanced diagrammatic theory. In Ref. range-separated density functionals have been used as a starting point of the \(G_0W_0\) calculation, and these scored a similar improvement in quasi-particle energies as the one reported here by applying the vertex. In some sense, this starting point is constructed to reproduce the system's IP, whereas the method we employ is completely *ab initio* and, as such, does not require any previous information on the system's electronic structure. Another well established class of *ab initio* approaches is the algebraic diagrammatic construction (ADC). It offers a general framework to generate the self-energy diagrams at any order in perturbation theory. The two-particle one-hole Tamm-Dancoff approximation (2ph-TDA) is the simplest ADC method and it includes bubble and particle-hole ladder diagrams in its resummation. It is quite striking that, albeit this approximation is diagrammatically similar to the \(GW\Gamma\) method, its performance for small molecules is unsatisfactory with a mean absolute error (*vs* CCSD(T)) that exceeds 0.6 eV. The inclusion of all self-energy diagrams up to third order, as it is performed in the ADC(3) approximation, largely improves the IP's values. It is important to point out that in the 2ph-TDA approach the 2p-2h virtual excitations are not included, whereas these effects are implicitly accounted for by the coupling amplitudes in the full ADC(3). These excitations are responsible for introducing correlation effects in the HF ground state (which is obviously uncorrelated) and are explicitly built in the \(GW\) and \(GW\Gamma\) approximation thanks to the inclusion of the so-called resonant-antiresonant coupling. The comparison between our results and those obtained with the electron propagator methods cited above allows us to rationalise the poor performance of the 2ph-TDA. Specifically, the coupling between resonant and antiresonant virtual transistions is a key feature of \(GW\) (and \(GW\Gamma\)) that is implicitly accounted for in ADC(3). This coupling seems to be responsible for a dramatic improvement over the quasi-particle energies obtained at the 2ph-TDA level. On the other hand, the inclusion of other higher order particle-particle ladders in the ADC(3) method appear to have an overall modest impact (with the exceptions discussed above that are poorly described by the HF reference), since its performance on small molecules is comparable to that of the \(GW\Gamma\) method. The comparison with experimental data (, bottom panel) proceeds along similar lines as above, with the mean absolute error increasing slightly owing to the impact of adiabatic effects on the measurements for a number of systems considered (these are reported in as non-italicised entries).
# Conclusions
The main topic of this work is the inclusion of exchange diagrams in both the polarization propagator as well as the self-energy using Hedin's equations. Commonly this is referred to as the \(GW\Gamma\) approximation. In Hedin's equations the interaction kernel is strictly given by the functional derivative of the self-energy employed in the preceding step with respect to the Green's function. In the present work, we adopt the Hartree-Fock starting point. Then from the derivative of the Hartree-term \(V_\mathrm{H}\) with respect to the Green's function, one obtains the standard RPA bubble diagrams, and from the derivative of the exchange potential \(\Sigma_\mathrm{x}=V_\mathrm{x}\) one obtains the ladder diagrams. Hence, applying the common \(GW\) approximation---that includes bubbles only but neglects ladder diagrams---is from the outset a flawed prescription for the Hartree-Fock starting point. If it were successful, this could only be related to some sort of error cancellation. An important aspect of the present work is whether such a cancellation exists. To finally and concisely answer this question, we have performed quasi-particle calculations on top of the Hartree-Fock approximation for a set of 29 small molecules. As already alluded to above, we have included the ladder diagrams related to the derivative of the exchange potential, in both the polarization propagator and the self-energy. The applied equations have been derived from Hedin's equations and should be fairly easy to implement in any time-dependent Hartree-Fock, Casida or BSE code. We have also argued that, although the final equations ([\[eq:SigmaR\]](#eq:SigmaR){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SigmaR"}) essentially only rephrase the equation of motion for the Green's function, they have not yet been used in quantum chemistry or computational solid state physics. This is somewhat astounding, since the implementation is, in principle, straightforward. All one needs to know are the two-particle eigenstates of the TD-HF equation. Now let us turn to our results. The first, already often published, observation is that the \(G_0W_0\) approximation is not satisfactory when performed on top of HF. It systematically overestimates the IP's. This should come as no surprise. In the \(G_0W_0\) approximation, a non-physical polarizability is used, that is calculated without particle-hole ladder diagrams related to the variation of the exchange. Inclusion of the ladder diagrams in the polarization propagator (which is equivalent to using the polarizability from TD-HF) largely rectifies this issue and massively improves agreement with the CCSD(T) reference values. The mean absolute error decreases from about 400 meV in \(G_0W_0\) to 150 meV in this \(G_0W_0^{\mathrm{tc-tc}}\) approximation. Including the exchange diagrams in the polarizability only is, however, not an entirely well balanced approximation instead, one should include the exchange diagrams also in the self-energy (\(G_0W_0\Gamma\) approximation). The \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) values are always in between the standard \(G_0W_0\) and the \(G_0W_0^{\mathrm{tc-tc}}\) results, as discussed in more detail in the next paragraph. With a mean absolute deviation of 210 meV compared to the CCSD(T) reference results, \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) results are on average slightly worse than the \(G_0W_0^{\mathrm{tc-tc}}\) (MAE 150 meV). This is certainly somewhat unsatisfactory and requires further studies and, in particular, better reference values. With an error of roughly 100 meV for cc-pVQZ basis sets, CCSD(T) values without basis set extrapolation are not sufficiently accurate to allow for an unambigious comparison. In passing, we also emphasize a side result of our study, namely that \(G_0W_0\) converges differently with respect to basis set size than \(G_0W_0\Gamma\). This is a result of the inclusion of the exchange diagrams in the self-energy as shown in Fig. [\[Fig:QP_extrap\]](#Fig:QP_extrap){reference-type="ref" reference="Fig:QP_extrap"}. This also means that comparisons at finite basis sets (without basis set corrections) need to be done with caution, since one could observe fortuitous agreement at small basis sets that might not hold up at improved basis sets. A key result of this study is that changes from \(G_0W_0^{\mathrm{tc-tc}}\) to \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) are very system-dependent: in some cases, \(G_0W_0\Gamma\) recovers the \(G_0W_0\) values, in other cases the final values are closer to \(G_0W_0^{\mathrm{tc-tc}}\). As an example, one can consider the case of ammonia and phosphine: they have a comparable geometry and valence electron configuration, with the obvious difference that phosphorus is one period below nitrogen in the periodic table. In one case (PH\(_{\text{3}}\)) the introduction of the vertex in the self-energy has a marginal impact on the IP, whereas for NH\(_{\text{3}}\) the higher electronegativity of the central atom, as discussed in the previous section, leads to increased electron correlations and to a more pronounced difference between \(G_0W_0^{\mathrm{tc-tc}}\) and \(G_0W_0\Gamma\). Albeit these observations are in line with \"chemical intuition\", they are difficult to generalise, let alone if quantitative estimates are required. We conclude that there is simply no shortcut to \(GW\Gamma\) or general error cancellation; one needs to include the vertex consistently. All these results are in agreement with previous work on solids, where on average the vertex in the self-energy also compensated the effect of the vertex in the polarization propagator, and as for molecules, the results varied significantly between different solids and even different orbitals. Finally, let us comment on the future perspectives: to us it is clear that the effect of self-consistency on the Green's function needs to be studied. Unfortunately, this is not a simple matter. If one updates the self-energy and the Green's function, additional terms come into play in the interaction kernel \(I\), and ultimately one is then forced to make compromises between computational efficiency and accuracy. We plan to report a combination of self-consistency and vertex corrections in our forthcoming study. In summary, we have shown that \(G_0W_0\Gamma\)\@HF improves upon \(G_0W_0\)\@HF. This implies that the vertex in Hedin's equations is important and can not be neglected. Given the simplicity of the present approach, we are confident that it will draw interest in the computational quantum chemistry community, as it constitutes an important fundamental step towards accurate quasi-particle calculations. | {'timestamp': '2017-08-17T02:07:28', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01815', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01815'} |
null | null |
null | null |
# One-way definability in the sweeping case | {'timestamp': '2018-12-07T02:13:01', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01668', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01668'} |
null | null |
# Introduction {#Sec:Into}
Consider the Brownian excursion standardized to have length 1 and conditioned to be positive. This is also the Brownian bridge conditioned to stay positive, or the 3-dimensional Bessel process conditioned to hit zero at \(t=1\), and its | {'timestamp': '2018-01-15T02:11:54', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01578', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01578'} |
null | null |
# Introduction
It has been found recently that for any 4d \({\cal N}=2\) SCFT, there is a protected sector described by a 2d chiral algebra or more precisely a vertex operator algebra (VOA). The VOA corresponding to 4d \({\cal N}=2\) SCFT includes the operators in the Higgs branch chiral ring and more generally the so-called Schur operators. Correlation functions in this sector are meromorphic and do not change under exactly marginal deformations. The 2d chiral algebra[^1] is constructed from the 4d theory as follows. First, pick a two-dimensional slice in the four-dimensional space \(\mathbb{R}^2 \subset \mathbb{R}^4\) with complex coordinates \((z, \bar{z})\). Then choose a set of particular operators \({\cal O}(z, \bar{z})\) living on this plane \(\mathbb{R}^2\) annihilated by a combination of Poincare and conformal supercharges \(\mathfrak{Q} = Q + S\). At the origin these operators are the Schur operators. The operator product expansion (OPE) of these operators turns out to be meromorphic up to the \(\mathfrak{Q}\)-exact piece. Therefore by passing through the \(\mathfrak{Q}\)-cohomology, the operators \({\cal O}(z, \bar{z})\) form a meromorphic chiral algebra or VOA. Under this 4d \({\cal N}=2\) SCFT/VOA correspondence, the 2d Virasoro central charge is given in terms of 4d central charge as \[\begin{aligned}
c_{2d} =-12 c_{4d} \. \end{aligned}\] When there is a (non-R) global symmetry \(\mathfrak{g}\), the symmetry in 2d is enhanced to affine symmetry \(\hat{\mathfrak{g}}_{k_{2d}}\) with the level given by the 4d flavor central charge as \[\begin{aligned}
k_{2d} =-\frac{1}{2} k_{4d} \. \end{aligned}\] The (super)-character of the VOA gives the Schur limit of the superconformal index \[\begin{aligned}
{\rm Tr}_{{\cal V}} (-1)^F q^{L_0} = {\cal I}_{\mathrm{Schur}}(q) \, \end{aligned}\] where \({\cal V}\) denotes the VOA or the vacuum module of the corresponding chiral algebra. We review the definition of the superconformal index and its various limits in appendix [\[app:n2idx\]](#app:n2idx){reference-type="ref" reference="app:n2idx"}. Various aspects of the VOA corresponding to the 4d \({\cal N}=2\) SCFT has been studied. The topological field theory (TQFT) structure of the chiral algebra for the class \({\cal S}\) theory has been investigated in. The chiral algebra for the (generalized) Argyres-Douglas theory and also for the \({\cal N}=3\) theories has been identified. Bounds on the central charges have been obtained using the chiral algebra structure. The effect of the defect operators has been studied in. It has also been conjectured that it is possible to reconstruct the Higgs branch and also Macdonald index from the chiral algebra. Moreover, the Coulomb branch index is related to the modular transformation of the VOA. Our primary focus in this paper is to understand the Schur sector and the Higgs branch of the generalized Argyres-Douglas theory that can be engineered from M5-branes. They are interesting because the corresponding chiral algebra/VOA for a subset of such AD theories are particularly simple. In this paper, we focus on the subset of the AD theories, where 1) there is no mass parameters associated to the irregular singularity \(J^b[k]\), and 2) there is no exactly marginal deformations. It is widely believed that every exactly marginal operator in \(4d\) \({\cal N}=2\) SCFT comes from the gauge coupling. Therefore the existence of a marginal coupling signals that this theory can be decomposed into decoupled SCFTs by setting the gauge coupling to zero. We will focus on the "non-decomposable\" AD theories.[^2] The main tools we use are the conjectural vertex operator algebra and the topological field theory structure suggested by the M5-brane construction of the class \({\cal S}\) theory theories. The Schur index for any class \({\cal S}\) theory can be obtained by using the 4d/2d correspondence between 4d SCFT and 2d topological quantum field theory (TQFT). This correspondence has also been extended to the case with irregular punctures, which allows us to obtain the index for the AD theory. It has also been found to be consistent with the vacuum character of the chiral algebra for the AD theory. The result also agrees with the IR computation in the Coulomb branch done by using the BPS monodromy operator. The full superconformal index has been computed using the renormalization group flow from certain \({\cal N}=1\) gauge theory to the \({\cal N}=2\) AD theory, which gives a consistent result with the chiral algebra. We consider a class of AD theories labeled as \((J^b[k], Y)\).[^3] This class of SCFTs is engineered using 6d \({\cal N}=(2,0)\) theory of type \(J \in ADE\) on a Riemann sphere with one irregular singularity labeled by \(J^b[k]\), and one regular singularity labeled by \(Y\) which also specifies a nilpotent orbit[^4] of \(J\). When there is no regular puncture (or \(Y=\varnothing\)), we use the notation \(J^b[k]\equiv(J^b[k], \varnothing)\) to denote the corresponding theory. When the regular puncture is full (\(Y=F\)) or null (\(Y=\varnothing\)), the VOAs for the corresponding theories \((J^b[k], F)\) and \(J^b[k]\) have been conjectured in. On the other-hand, in it was shown that the associated VOA for the theories given by other type of punctures can be obtained via quantum Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction. Combining the two, we obtain the following:
- The VOA for the \((J^b[k], Y)\) theory is given by the W-algebra \({\cal W}^{k_{2d}}(J, Y)\), where \(k_{2d}=-h+{b\over b+k}\) with \(h\) being the dual Coxeter number of \(J\). Here \({\cal W}^{k_{2d}}(J, Y)\) is the W-algebra obtained via quantum Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction of the Kac-Moody algebra \(\widehat{J}_{k_{2d}}\) using the nilpotent orbit associated to \(Y\): \[\begin{aligned}
\widehat{J}_{k_{2d}}= {\cal W}^{k_{2d}}(J, F) \leadsto {\cal W}^{k_{2d}}(J, Y) \end{aligned}\] Here \(F\) denotes the full puncture carrying the flavor symmetry \(J\).
As was conjectured in, the VOA also allows us to extract the Higgs branch of the 4d theory. Therefore we have:
- The Higgs branch of theory \((J^b[k], Y)\) is identified with the associated variety \(X_{\cal V}\) of \({\cal W}^{k_{2d}}(J, Y)\):[^5] \[\begin{aligned}
\boxed{ {\cal M}_{\mathrm{Higgs}} = X_{\cal V} } \end{aligned}\] The associated variety \(X_{\cal V}\) is given in terms of the closure of a nilpotent orbit, which depends on the choice of \(k\) and \(Y\) as:
- If \(k>0\), the associated variety is \[\begin{aligned}
X_{{\cal V}}= N \cap S_Y \, \end{aligned}\] where \(N\) is the principal nilpotent cone, and \(S_Y\) is the Slodowy slice defined using the nilpotent orbit corresponding to \(Y\).
- If \(k<0\), the associated variety is given as \[X_{{\cal V}}=X_M \cap S_Y \,\] where \(X_M = \overline{\mathbb{O}[k]}\) is the closure of a certain nilpotent orbit which *depends on \(k\)*.
The goal of the current paper is to verify the conjectures above. We test them by computing the Schur and Hall-Littlewood indices of the \((J^b[k], Y)\) theory and comparing them with the character and the associated variety of the chiral algebra \({\cal W}^{k_{2d}}(J, Y)\). We also utilize the 3d mirror symmetry whenever it is available. One of the key result of the current paper is the following:
- The Schur index of the theory \((J^b[k], Y)\) is given by the vacuum character of algebra \({\cal W}^{k_{2d}}(J, Y)\). In particular, when \(b=h\) and \(Y=F\) (the full puncture), the character has a surprisingly simple formula in terms of plethystic exponential, \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:IdxFull} \boxed{ {\cal I}_{(J^h[k], F)} (q; \vec{z}) = \mathrm{PE} \left[ \frac{q-q^{h+k}}{(1-q)(1-q^{h+k})}\chi^F_{\textrm{adj}} (\vec{z}) \right] } \. \end{aligned}\] When there is no regular puncture, or equivalently \(Y=\varnothing\), the Schur index is given by \[\begin{aligned}
\boxed{ {\cal I}_{J^h [k]}(q) = \frac{1}{\prod_{i=1}^r (q^{d_i}; q)} \mathrm{PE} \left[-\frac{q^{h+k}}{1-q^{h+k}} \chi_{\textrm{adj}} (q^{\vec\rho}) \right] } \. \end{aligned}\] Here \(d_i\) are the degrees of the Casimirs of \(J\) and \(\vec{\rho}\) is the Weyl vector. The plethystic exponential is defined as \[\mathrm{PE}\left[x\right] = \exp\left(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}x^n\right).\] We also give a similar expression for the general puncture of type \(Y\) in section [4](#sec:Schur){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Schur"}.
It was proven that our formula for the Schur index [\[eq:IdxFull\]](#eq:IdxFull){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:IdxFull"} for the \((J_h[k], F)\) theory is indeed identical to the vacuum character of the corresponding VOA. This paper is organized as follows. In section [2](#sec:ADthy){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ADthy"}, we review some basic facts about the AD theories we consider. In section [3](#sec:ADVOA){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ADVOA"}, we describe the corresponding vertex operator algebras of our theories. In section [4](#sec:Schur){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Schur"}, we describe the TQFT approach to the Schur index and thereby giving a physical derivation of the character formula for the associated chiral algebra. In section [5](#sec:Higgs){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Higgs"}, we study the Higgs branch from three perspectives: the associated variety of the vertex operator algebra, the 3d mirror symmetry, and the TQFT approach. We find these different approaches give consistent results. Finally, we conclude with a remark in section [6](#sec:Conclusion){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Conclusion"}. In the appendix, we review the definition of the superconformal index and its limits and also list the nilpotent orbits which can appear as the Higgs branch of the AD theories considered in this paper.
# Generalized Argyres-Douglas theories from M5-branes {#sec:ADthy}
One can engineer four-dimensional \(\mathcal{N}=2\) Argyres-Douglas SCFT by putting six dimensional \({\cal N}=(2,0)\) theory of type \(J\) on a two-dimensional Riemann surface with the following configurations: a) Sphere with an irregular singularity; b) Sphere with one irregular singularity and one regular singularity. The regular singularity is classified in terms of the nilpotent orbits[^6] of the Lie algebra \(J\). The classification of the irregular singularity is related to the classification of positive grading of Lie algebra \(J\).
## Irreducible irregular singularity
**Irregular singularity** Let us start with the 6d \({\cal N}=(2,0)\) theory of type \(J\) and compactify it on a Riemann surface \(\Sigma\), to get a four dimensional \(\mathcal{N}=2\) theory. The Coulomb branch of the 4d theory is described by a Hitchin system defined on \(\Sigma\). The Hitchin system involves a holomorphic one-form \(\Phi\) which is called the Higgs field, and the irregular singularity is defined by the following singular boundary condition: \[\Phi={T_k\over z^{2+{k\over b}}}+\ldots\.\] Here \(T_k\) is a regular semi-simple element of \(J\). The allowed value of \(b\) has been classified in and summarized in table [1](#table:isolatedsingularitiesALEfib){reference-type="ref" reference="table:isolatedsingularitiesALEfib"}. We label these irregular singularities as \(J^b[k]\). The mass parameters are identified with the parameters appear as the coefficient of the first order pole. We list the type of irregular singularities that do not admit any mass parameter in table [2](#table:constraint){reference-type="ref" reference="table:constraint"}. We call them as irreducible irregular singularities. One can get an AD theory using a single irreducible irregular singularity of the above type, and the central charge for such theory is shown in table [3](#table:noflavor:centralcharges){reference-type="ref" reference="table:noflavor:centralcharges"}. One can also find the Coulomb branch spectrum by studying the Seiberg-Witten geometry.
Two extreme situations where \(Y\) being \(F\)(full) or \(\varnothing\)(null) have been considered in, and the corresponding VOAs are the affine Kac-Moody algebra \(\widehat{J}\) and the standard \(W\)-algebra associated with \(J\). For a general choice of \(Y\), we obtain the VOA for the corresponding theory via quantum Drinfeld-Sokolov (qDS) reduction. The central charge of the vertex operator algebra \({\cal W}^{k}(J, Y)\) is given as \[\begin{aligned}
c_{2d}=\textrm{dim}J_0-{1\over 2} \textrm{dim} J_{1/2}-{12\over k+h} \big|\rho-(k+h)x \big|^2 \, \label{2dcentral} \end{aligned}\] where \(h\) is the dual Coxeter number, and \(\rho\) is the longest root. Let us explain the notation: for a nilpotent orbit, one has a \(su(2)\) triple \((x,e,f)\) so that \([x,e]=e,~[x,f]=-f, [e,f]=x\). Here \(x\) is a semi-simple element of the Lie algebra \(J\), and \(f\) is a nilpotent element. This can be also obtained by choosing a \(su(2)\) embedding \(\Lambda_Y\) into \(J\) given by the choice of \(Y\). It gives \((x, e, f) = (\Lambda_Y(\sigma^3), \Lambda_Y(\sigma^+), \Lambda_Y(\sigma^-))\). Now, \(J\) has an eigenspace decomposition under the adjoint action of \(x\) as: \[\begin{aligned}
J=\bigoplus_{j\in {1\over 2}\mathbb{Z}} J_j \, \end{aligned}\] Let \(J^f\) be the centralizer of \(f\) in \(J\), which also has a grading by the adjoint action of \(x\): \[J^f= \bigoplus_{j \in \frac{1}{2} \mathbb{Z}} J_{-j}^f\] For us, \(f\) is an element of the nilpotent orbit associated to \(Y\). The algebra \({\cal W}^{k_F}(J, Y)\) is strongly generated by \(\textrm{dim}J^f\) fields \(X^a(z)\), where \(a\) runs over a basis of \(J^f\). The generator \(X^a(z)\) has a conformal weight \(1+j\) if \(X^a\in J_{-j}^f\). The level \(k_{2d}\) of an affine Kac-Moody algebra \(\widehat{J}_{k_{2d}}\) (for \(J=ADE\)) is called *admissible* if it can be written in the following way \[k_{2d} =-h+{p\over q},~~(p,q)=1,~~p\geq h.\] So only for \(b=h\), the level of our conjectural VOA is admissible. The vacuum character of the corresponding affine Kac-Moody algebra with admissible level and the \(W\)-algebra obtained from qDS are given in and respectively. There is one simple consistency check we can do: the 4d central charge can be computed using the method presented in and can be used to check with 2d central charge formula ([\[2dcentral\]](#2dcentral){reference-type="ref" reference="2dcentral"}).
#### Examples
Let us study several interesting class of examples. \((A_1, ADE)\)[^8] theories are a class of well studied Argyes-Douglas theories. The \((A_1, A_{2N})\) theory can be realized by the choice \(J=A_1, b=2, k=2N+1\) with \(Y=\varnothing\) being trivial. The \((A_1, D_{2N-1})\) theory can be realized from \(J=A_1, b=2, k=2N-3\) with \(Y=F\) being the full puncture. The \((A_1, E_6)\) theory can be realized from \(J=A_2, b=3, k=4\) with \(Y=\varnothing\), and the \((A_1, E_8)\) theory can be realized from \(J=A_2, b=3, k=5\) with \(Y=\varnothing\). The corresponding VOAs are listed in table [6](#A1ADE){reference-type="ref" reference="A1ADE"}. In the following, we will find VOAs for other AD theories in this class. **Example 1**: Consider the case with \(J=A_{N-1},~ b=N,~k=1\), and \(Y=[N-1,1]\). This theory is identical to the \((A_1, A_{2N-1})\) theory and has \(U(1)\) global symmetry (except for \(N=2\), which has enhanced \(SU(2)\) symmetry). The corresponding VOA is \({\cal W}^{-{N^2\over N+1}}(A_{N-1}, Y)\). **Example 2**: Consider the theory defined by data \(J=A_{N-1}, ~b=N,~k=-1\) and \(Y=[N-2,1,1]\). It gives the \((A_1, D_{2N-2})\) theory which has \(SU(2)\times U(1)\) flavor symmetry (except for \(N=3\), which has enhanced \(SU(3)\) symmetry). The corresponding VOA is \({\cal W}^{{-N^2+2N\over N-1}}(A_{N-1}, Y)\). **Example 3**: Choose \(J=A_{N-1}, ~b=N-1,~(k,b)=1\) and \(Y\) to be trivial. The same theory can be also obtained from \(J=A_{N-1},~b=N,~k=N-1\), and a simple puncture \(Y=[N-1,1]\). This also belongs to our list. The \((A_1, E_7)\) theory is identical to \((A_2^2[3], [2, 1])\). Using the other description, we find that the corresponding VOA is \({\cal W}^{-{13\over5}}(A_2, [2, 1])\). The complete results are summarized in table [6](#A1ADE){reference-type="ref" reference="A1ADE"}. We are able to recover what was found in. These theories can also be realized in other ways, for example \((A_1, A_{2N})\) theory can be realized using \(J=A_{2N}\). In general, there are many different M5-brane realizations of the identical 4d AD theory. Whenever this happens, we find isomorphisms between W-algebras.
For a general 4d \({\cal N}=2\) SCFT, the above relation has to be modified, since \(R_{\cal V}\) is in general (conjectured to be) given by the Hall-Littlewood (HL) chiral ring. The HL chiral ring is generated by the operators contributing to the HL index, which is not in general identical to the Higgs branch operators. But they are indeed identical when the 4d \({\cal N}=2\) SCFT is given by a quiver gauge theory with no loops. We conjecture this is also the case for the AD theories.
#### Examples
Let us consider some simple examples. The VOA \((A_1, A_{2n})\) theory is given by a simple Virasoro minimal model. For these theories, \(L_{-1}\ket{0}\) is a null state, therefore \(R_{\cal V}\) is trivial and \(X_{\cal V}\) is a point. The VOA for the \((A_1, D_{2n+1})\) theory, is given by \(\widehat{\mathfrak{su}}(2)_{-\frac{4n}{2n+1}}\). In this case, we have 3 generators \(J^+, J^0, J^-\). So \(R_{\cal V}\) is generated by \(J^+_{-1}, J^0_{-1}, J^-_{-1}\). But there is a relation \(L_{-2} \ket{0} \sim (J^+_{-1} J^-_{-1} +J^0_{-1}J^0_{-1})\ket{0}\) which is coming from the Sugawara construction of the Virasoro generators from the affine Lie algebra. Since \(L_{-2} \ket{0} \in F^1 {\cal V}\), it has to be modded out.[^10] This gives us \[\begin{aligned}
R_{\cal V} = \mathbb{C}[x, y, z]/\langle xy+z^2\rangle \. \end{aligned}\] We see that the associated variety \[\begin{aligned}
X_{\cal V} = \textrm{Spec}(R_{\cal V}) = \{x, y, z \in \mathbb{C} ~|~ xy+z^2=0 \} = \mathbb{C}^2/\mathbb{Z}_2 \end{aligned}\] is identical to the Higgs branch of the \((A_1, D_{2n+1})\) theory.
#### Non-maximal punctures
Now let us consider the VOA \(W^{k_{2d}}(J, Y)\) associated to our AD theories \((J^b[k], Y)\), where we partially close the puncture as the one labeled by \(Y\). We also assume that the level \(k_F\) is admissible, i.e. \(b=h\). The associated variety for this case has been already determined by Arakawa, and the answer takes the following form \[X_{\cal V}=X_M\cap S_Y.\] Here \(X_M\) is the associated variety of the Kac-Moody algebra \(\widehat{J}_{k_{2d}}\), and \(S_Y\) is the Slodowy slice defined using the nilpotent element of \(Y\). Recall that the Slodowy slice defined by \(Y\) is given by \(S_Y = \oplus_j R_j\) under the decomposition \(\mathrm{adj} \to \bigoplus_j R_i \otimes V_j\). The space \(X_{\cal V}\) is identical to the Higgs branch obtained by the partial closure of the puncture given by \(Y\), which is the commutant of the nilpotent element \(\Lambda_Y(\sigma^+)\) inside the Higgs branch \(X_{\cal V}\). The associated variety \(X_M\) is given by the closure of a nilpotent orbit \(\mathbb{O}[k_{2d}]\), depending only on the denominator of \(k_{2d} =-\frac{1}{2} k_F\). If the level is given in the following form \[k_{2d} =-h+{p\over q},~~(p,q)>1, p\geq h,\] the associated variety is given by \[\begin{aligned}
X_M = \overline{\mathbb{O}}_q \. \end{aligned}\] Here the nilpotent orbits \(\mathbb{O}_q\) for each \(J\) is given in tables [\[table:ADorbits\]](#table:ADorbits){reference-type="ref" reference="table:ADorbits"}, [\[table:E6orbits\]](#table:E6orbits){reference-type="ref" reference="table:E6orbits"}, [\[table:E7orbits\]](#table:E7orbits){reference-type="ref" reference="table:E7orbits"}, [\[table:E8orbits\]](#table:E8orbits){reference-type="ref" reference="table:E8orbits"}, reproduced from.
## Examples {#sec:HiggsEx}
In this subsection, we focus on theories with \(J=A_{N-1}\), \(b=N\). This gives the corresponding chiral algebra to be the Kac-Moody algebra \(\widehat{\mathfrak{su}}(N)_{k_{2d}}\) with level taking the following form \[k_{2d}=-N+{N\over N+k},~~(k,N)=1.\] If \(k>0\), then the associated variety is the principal nilpotent cone of the \(A_{N-1}\) Lie algebra. This is identical to the Higgs branch of the (3d \({\cal N}=4\)) quiver gauge theory \[\begin{aligned}
(1)-(2)-(3)-\ldots-(N-1)-[N] \. \end{aligned}\] Here, each nodes of \((n)\) means \(U(n)\) gauge group and \([N]\) refers to \(SU(N)\) flavor group. If \(k<0\), then the associated variety is the closure of the following nilpotent orbit labelled by a partition of \(N\) \[,~~s\leq q-1 \,\] where \(q=N+k\). The nilpotent orbit can be identified with the Higgs branch of a quiver gauge theory associated with the transpose of the partition above, which is \([\underbrace{r+1, \ldots, r+1}_s,\underbrace{r,\ldots, r}_{q-s}, ]\). The quiver is: \[\begin{aligned}
(r)-(2r)-\ldots-((q-s)r)-((q-s)r+r+1)-\ldots-(N-(r+1))-[N]. \end{aligned}\]
#### \(\mathbf{k>0}\)
According to Arakawa's result, the Higgs branch of these theories is identified with nilpotent cone of \(A_{N-1}\) Lie algebra.
#### \(\mathbf{k=-1}\)
For this case, \(k_{2d} =-N + \frac{N}{N-1}\) so that \(q=N-1 < h^\vee = N\). The associated variety for the VOA is given by the nilpotent orbit labelled by the partition \((N-1, 1)\). This gives the following quiver described by the transpose of the partition \((2, 1, 1, \ldots, 1)\): \[\begin{aligned}
(1)-(2)-(3)-\ldots-(N-2)-[N] \label{kequalminusone} \end{aligned}\] The Higgs branch of the above quiver gauge theory is the closure of sub-regular nilpotent orbit.
#### \(\mathbf{k=-N+2}\)
For this case, \(k_{2d} =-N +\frac{N}{2}\). We choose \(N=2n+1\) to be an odd number. Then the nilpotent orbit is given by the partition \((2, 2, \ldots, 2, 1)\). The transpose of the partition is given by \((2N+1, N)\), which gives the quiver \[\begin{aligned}
(N)-[2N+1] \. \label{mini} \end{aligned}\] The Higgs branch of the above quiver gauge theory is identical to the Higgs branch of the \((A_{N-1}^N[-N+2], F)\) theory.
#### Minimal nilpotent orbits
Let us consider some theories whose corresponding VOAs have non-admissible levels. The Higgs branch of the \((D_4^4[-3], F)\), \((E_6^9[-8],F)\), \((E_7^{14}[-13],F)\), \((E_8^{24}[-23],F)\) theories are given by the minimal nilpotent orbit \(D_4, E_6, E_7, E_8\). These are the same theories as the rank 1 SCFTs with \(D_4, E_{6, 7, 8}\) global symmetries. Affine vertex operator algebras with non-admissible levels have been studied recently, and the corresponding associated variety is exactly the minimal nilpotent orbit.
## Check using 3d mirror
It is possible to write down the 3d mirror quiver \(B\) for the class of theory \((J^b[k], Y)\) with \(J=A_{N-1}, b=N, (k,N)=1\) and \(Y=F\) being a full puncture (see section [2](#sec:ADthy){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ADthy"}). The Coulomb branch of this mirror quiver B (in the IR limit) should give the Higgs branch of the original 4d theory \(A\). It is often possible to find another 3d quiver \(C\) whose Higgs branch would be the same as the IR Coulomb branch of theory \(B\). In turn, the Higgs branch of the quiver \(C\) coincides with the Higgs branch of original 4d theory \(A\). Therefore, the quiver \(C\) can be very useful to check Arakawa's result. We will discuss several examples here, and leave the full check of Arakawa's result to an interested reader. Consider a theory given by \(\mathbf{J=A_{2N},~b=2N+1,~k=-2N+1}\), and a full regular puncture \(Y=F\). The 3d mirror of this theory is described by the following quiver (here we ungauge the \(U(1)\) gauge group, see figure [\[3dmirror\]](#3dmirror){reference-type="ref" reference="3dmirror"}): \[\begin{aligned}
\begin{split} &(1)-(2)-\ldots-(N)-(N)-\ldots-(2)-(1)\\ &~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ~~~~~~~~ | \\ &~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[1] ~~~~~~[1] \end{split} \end{aligned}\] The mirror of the above quiver can be found using the Hanany-Witten construction, and it is exactly as the one shown in [\[mini\]](#mini){reference-type="eqref" reference="mini"}. The Higgs branch of this quiver (which is identical to the Higgs branch of the original 4d theory) is exactly given by the closure of nilpotent orbit labelled as \([N+1, N]\). Let us now consider the theory with \(\bf{J=A_{N-1},~b=N,~k=1}\) and a full regular puncture (\(Y=F\)). Its 3d mirror is given as below (see also figure [\[3dmirror\]](#3dmirror){reference-type="ref" reference="3dmirror"}): \[\begin{aligned}
-(N-1)-\ldots-(2)-(1) \end{aligned}\] This quiver is self-mirror, and the Coulomb branch is given by the nilpotent cone of the \(\mathrm{su}(N+1)\) Lie algebra. This agrees with the associated variety of the corresponding VOA. Finally, Let's now consider the theory with \(\bf{(J=A_{N-1},~b=N,~k=-1)}\) and a full regular puncture, its 3d mirror is (see figure. [\[3dmirror\]](#3dmirror){reference-type="ref" reference="3dmirror"} and we ungauge the \(U(1)\) gauge group.) \[\begin{aligned}
\begin{split} &[N-2]-(N-2)-(N-2)-(N-3)-\ldots-(2)-(1)\\ &~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| \\ &~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[1] \end{split} \end{aligned}\] Using the Hanany-Witten construction, one can find its mirror as shown in [\[kequalminusone\]](#kequalminusone){reference-type="eqref" reference="kequalminusone"}.
## Check using TQFT
The Hall-Littlewood limit of the superconformal index is defined as \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal I}_{HL}(t) = {\rm Tr}_{{\cal H}_{HL}} (-1)^F t^{E-R} \, \end{aligned}\] where the trace is over the states satisfying \(E-2R-r=0\) and \(j_1=0\). The Hall-Littlewood (HL) index is conjectured to be the same as the Hilbert series on the Higgs branch for a large class of theories.[^11] We will use the TQFT description to compute the HL indices for the AD theories and verify against the direct computation for the nilpotent orbits for the possible cases. From the TQFT we also derive concise expressions for the Hilbert series of the Higgs branch for certain AD theories.
### Wave function for the irregular puncture
We follow similar strategy as in the case of Schur index. First, we come up with the wave function for the Gaiotto state (minimally irregular singularity) realizing the pure Yang-Mills (YM) theory. Second, we try to guess the wave functions for other irregular singularities. The Hall-Littlewood index for the pure YM theory with gauge group \(J\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal I}_{HL}^J = \oint [d\vec{z}] I_{\textrm{vec}} (\vec{z}) = \oint [d\vec{z}] \mathrm{PE} \left[-t \chi_{\textrm{adj}} (\vec{z}) \right] = (1-t)^r \oint [d\vec{z}] \prod_{\vec{\alpha} \in \Delta_J} (1-t \vec{z}^{\vec\alpha}) \. \end{aligned}\] We find a closed form expression for the \(G=SU(N)\) case as \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal I}_{HL}^{SU(N)} = \prod_{n=1}^{N-1} (1-t^{2n+1}) \. \end{aligned}\] From the TQFT structure of the index, we should be able to obtain the index from the sphere with two irregular punctures of the same type \(I_J \equiv I_J[-h+1]\). Therefore, we write the index as \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal I}_{HL}^{J} = \sum_{\vec\lambda} \psi_{\vec\lambda}^{I_{J}} \psi_{\vec\lambda}^{I_{J}} \, \end{aligned}\] where the wave function for the \(I_{J}\) puncture is given by \[\begin{aligned}
\psi_{\vec\lambda}^{I_{J}} =\oint [d\vec{z}] \mathrm{PE} \left[ -t \chi_{\textrm{adj}} (\vec{z}) \right] \psi_{\vec\lambda}(\vec{z}) = \oint [d\vec{z}] P^{HL}_{\vec\lambda} (\vec{z}) \. \end{aligned}\] And the wave function for the full regular puncture is given as \[\begin{aligned}
\psi_{\vec\lambda}(\vec{z}) = \mathrm{PE} \left[ t \chi_{\textrm{adj}} (\vec{z}) \right] P^{HL}_{\vec\lambda}(\vec{z}) \, \end{aligned}\] where \(P^{HL}_{\vec\lambda}(\vec z)\) is the (normalized) Hall-Littlewood polynomial. We have chosen our normalization of the Hall-Littlewood polynomial so that \[\begin{aligned}
\oint [d\vec{z}] I_{\textrm{vec}}(\vec{z}) \psi_{\vec{\lambda}}(\vec{z}) \psi_{\vec{\mu}}(\vec{z}) = \oint [d\vec{z}] \mathrm{PE} \left[ t \chi_{\textrm{adj}} (\vec{z}) \right] P^{HL}_{\vec\lambda}(\vec{z}) P^{HL}_{\vec\mu}(\vec{z}) = \delta_{\vec\lambda \vec\mu} \. \end{aligned}\] Using the orthonormality of the Hall-Littlewood polynomial under the vector multiplet measure, we get \[\begin{aligned}
\sum_{\vec \lambda} \psi_{\vec\lambda}^{I_J} \psi_{\vec\lambda}^{I_J} = \oint [d\vec{z}][d\vec{z'}] P^{HL}_{\vec\lambda}(\vec{z}) P^{HL}_{\vec\lambda}(\vec{z'}) = \oint [d\vec{z}]\mathrm{PE} \left[-t \chi_{\textrm{adj}} (\vec{z}) \right] = {\cal I}^J_{HL} \, \end{aligned}\] so that our wave function for the irregular puncture \(I_J\) is indeed consistent. Let us write some explicit examples. For \(J=A_1\), we get (\(I_{N, k} \equiv A_{N-1}^N[k]\)) \[\begin{aligned}
\psi_{\lambda}^{I_{2,-1}} = \begin{cases} \sqrt{1-t^2} & (\lambda = 0) \, \\ -t \sqrt{1-t} & (\lambda = 2) \. \end{cases} \end{aligned}\] When \(G=A_2\), we obtain \[\begin{aligned}
\begin{split} \psi_{(\lambda_1, \lambda_2)}^{I_{3,-2}} = \begin{cases} \sqrt{(1-t^2)(1-t^3)} & (\lambda_1, \lambda_2) = (0, 0), \\ -t (1-t^2) & (\lambda_1, \lambda_2) = (1, 1), \\ -t^3 (1-t) & (\lambda_1, \lambda_2) = (2, 2), \\ t^2 \sqrt{(1-t)(1-t^2)} & (\lambda_1, \lambda_2) = (3, 0), (0, 3), \\ 0 & \textrm{otherwise} \. \end{cases} \end{split} \end{aligned}\] We conjecture the wave function for \(k > 0\) to be \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:HLpsi0} \psi_{\vec\lambda}^{J^b[k]} = \prod_{i=1}^{r} (1-t^{d_i})^{\frac{1}{2}} \delta_{\vec{\lambda}, \vec{0}} \, \end{aligned}\] where \(r=\textrm{rank}(J)\) and \(d_i\) are the degrees of the Casimirs of \(J\). When \(k=-1\), we find the wave function to be \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:HLpsim1} \psi_{\vec{\lambda}}^{J^b[k]} = \begin{cases} \prod_{i=1}^r (1-t^{d_i})^{\frac{1}{2}} & \vec{\lambda} = \vec{0} \, \\ -t^{h-1}(1-t) \prod_{i=1}^{r-2} (1-t^{d_i})^\frac{1}{2} & \vec{\lambda} = \textrm{adjoint} \. \end{cases} \end{aligned}\] We have checked that the above expressions to be consistent with our previous results and known results. It is not obvious to us how to obtain the wave function (and thereby the index) for the general value of \(k\).
### AD theory of type \((J^h[k], Y)\)
From the TQFT structure, the Hall-Littlewood index for the \((J^b [k], F)\) theory can be written as \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal I}_{(J^b [k], F)} = \sum_{\vec \lambda} \psi_{\vec \lambda}^{J^b [k]} \psi_{\vec \lambda} (\vec{z}) \. \end{aligned}\] Plugging in the expression [\[eq:HLpsi0\]](#eq:HLpsi0){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:HLpsi0"} to above, it is straight-forward to obtain (for \(k>0\)) \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:HLidxA} {\cal I}_{(J^b [k], F)} = \frac{\prod_{i=1}^r (1-t^{d_i}) }{(1-t)^r \prod_{\vec{\alpha} \in \Delta_{J}} (1-t \vec{z}^{\vec{\alpha}})} \, \end{aligned}\] where we used the fact that \(P^{HL}_{\vec{\lambda} = \vec{0}} (\vec{z}) = \prod_{i=1}^r (1-t^{d_i})^\frac{1}{2}\). Here \(r = \textrm{rank}(J)\) and \(d_i\) are the degrees of the Casimirs of \(J\). Note that there is no dependence on \(k\), which reflects the fact that the Higgs branch for each \(k>0\) is the same. This agrees with the result of that the associated variety of the VOA for \(k>0\) is always given by a principal nilpotent cone. We claim that this expression is the closed-form expression for the Higgs branch (and equivalently the Coulomb branch since it is self-mirror) of the 3d \({\cal N}=4\) theory \(T[J]\) of with \(J \in ADE\). This result also agrees with that of.
#### Example: \((A_{N-1}^N[k], F) = (I_{N, k}, F)\) theory
From the TQFT structure, the Hall-Littlewood index for the \((A_{N-1}^N[k], F) = (I_{N, k}, F)\) theory for \(k>0\) can be written as \[\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:HLidxA} {\cal I}_{(A_{N-1}^N[k], F)} = \mathrm{PE} \left[ t \chi_{\textrm{adj}} (\vec{z}) \right] \prod_{n=2}^N (1-t^n) = \frac{\prod_{n=2}^N (1-t^n)}{(1-t)^{N-1} \prod_{\vec\alpha \in \Delta_{SU(N)}} (1-t \vec{z}^{\vec\alpha})} \. \end{aligned}\] This index is indeed the same as the Hilbert series of the Higgs branch of \(T[SU(N)]\) theory. This is also the same as the Hilbert series of the Coulomb branch because the \(T[SU(N)]\) theory is self-mirror.
#### Example: Non-principal orbits
Let us consider when the associated variety is given in terms of a non-principal orbit. For \(k=-1\), one can obtain the Hall-Littlewood index using [\[eq:HLpsim1\]](#eq:HLpsim1){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:HLpsim1"}. We find that when \(J\) is of \(A\) or \(D\) type, the index agrees with the Hilbert series of the sub-regular nilpotent orbit. For example, consider the \((A_2^3[-1], F) = (A_2, A_2) = (A_1, D_4)\) theory. The corresponding VOA is given by \(\widehat{\mathfrak{su}}(3)_{-\frac{3}{2}}\). The wave function for \(I_{3,-1}\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
\psi_{(\lambda_1, \lambda_2)}^{I_{3,-1}} = \begin{cases} \sqrt{(1-t^2)(1-t^3)} & (\lambda_1, \lambda_2) = (0, 0) \, \\ -t^2 (1-t) & (\lambda_1, \lambda_2) = (1, 1) \. \end{cases} \end{aligned}\] It reproduces the correct Hall-Littlewood index of the \((A_2, A_2)=(A_1, D_4)\) theory. We know that the Higgs branch of this theory is given by the minimal nilpotent orbit of \(SU(3)\), which is identical to the 1-instanton moduli space of \(SU(3)\).
#### Non-maximal punctures
As in the Schur case, it is straight-forward to obtain the theory for the general regular puncture \(Y\) via nilpotent Higgsing. The adjoint representation of \(J\) is now decomposed in terms of the commutant of the \(SU(2)\) embedding \(\Lambda_Y\) as \(\textrm{adj} \to \bigoplus_j R_j \otimes V_j\). Now, the wave function for the regular puncture of type \(Y\) is given by a concise closed form as \[\begin{aligned}
\psi^Y_{\vec \lambda} (\vec{a}) = \mathrm{PE} \left[ \sum_j t^{j+1} {\rm tr}_{R_j} (\vec{a}) \right] P^{HL}_{\vec\lambda} (\vec{a}t^{\Lambda_Y}) \, \end{aligned}\] where various symbols are the same as the ones defined around [\[eq:slodowy\]](#eq:slodowy){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:slodowy"}. Therefore, the index for the \((J^b[k], Y)\) theory with \(k>0\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal I}_{(J^b[k], Y)} = \mathrm{PE} \left[ \sum_j t^{j+1} {\rm tr}_{R_j} (\vec{a})-\sum_{i=1}^r t^{d_i}\right] = \frac{\prod_{i=1}^r (1-t^{d_i})}{\prod_j \prod_{\vec{w} \in R_j} (1-t^{j+1} \vec{a}^{\vec{w}})} \. \end{aligned}\] Here \(\vec{w} \in R_j\) denotes the weight vectors of the representation \(R_j\). This formula agrees with the one obtained in.
# Conclusion {#sec:Conclusion}
We systematically studied the chiral algebra/vertex operator algebra corresponding to a large class of Argyres-Douglas theories labeled as \((J^b[k], Y)\). Here \(J^b[k]\) denotes an irregular singularity carrying no mass parameters, and \(Y\) represents a regular singularity. We restricted to the case where there is no exactly marginal deformations. In particular, all the theories of the form \((A_1, \Gamma)\) with \(\Gamma \in ADE\) belongs to this class, so that we recover the result of. We found a surprisingly simple formula for the Schur index (which is equal to the vacuum character of the corresponding chiral algebra) when \(b=h\) utilizing the TQFT description of the index. The Higgs branch of a theory in this class is identified with the associated variety of the corresponding VOA, and we also found a concise formula for its Hilbert series or the Hall-Littlewood index. Various nilpotent orbits appear as the Higgs branch of an AD theory. However, not all of them appear. For the \(su(N)\) Lie algebra, only the nilpotent orbits of the form \([q,\ldots, q, s]\) appear. It would be interesting to find AD theories whose Higgs branch are given by other nilpotent orbits, or find some obstructions possibly along the line of. AD theories in our list can be used to construct various new SCFTs by gauging the flavor symmetry whenever available (they are called the AD matter in ). The Schur indices of these general SCFTs can be found using the Schur index of the AD matter. These indices can be used to check the S-duality of the Argyres-Douglas theory proposed in. However, not all of the AD theories can be constructed from the gluing of the AD theories considered in this paper, and it is interesting to find the indices of other AD matters used in. We derived many results for the theory \((J^b[k], Y)\) when \(b=h\), where the level of the corresponding chiral algebra is admissible. However, our results also suggests that similar results should also hold for \(b<h\) where the level for the corresponding VOA is not admissible. It would be interesting to study them further. Also, it would be interesting to find more refined partition functions, such as the Macdonald index, Lens space index and the full superconformal index for the AD theories in our class. We thank Chris Beem and Leonardo Rastelli for discussions and correspondence. JS and WY would like to thank the organizers of the workshop "Exact Operator Algebras in Superconformal Field Theories\" and Perimeter Institute for hospitality. JS also thanks Kavli IPMU for hospitality where this paper is finalized. The work of JS is supported in part by the US Department of Energy under UCSD's contract de-sc0009919 and also by Hwa-Ahm foundation. The work of DX and WY is supported by Center for Mathematical Sciences and Applications at Harvard University.
[^1]: We use the vertex operator algebra and chiral algebra interchangeably.
[^2]: For example, \(D_4^6[3] \equiv (D_4^6[3], \varnothing)\) theory has an exactly marginal operator. This theory can be decomposed into three copies of the \((A_1^2[1], F)\) theory (also called the \(H_1 = (A_1, A_3)\) theory in the literatures) coupled via \(SU(2)\) gauge group. The associated VOA is conjectured in.
[^3]: When \(b=h^\vee\) and \(Y=F\), this also is identical to the \(D_p(J)\) theory of with some value \(p\).
[^4]: In this paper, we use the Higgs branch label for a puncture, i.e. a full regular puncture corresponds to a trivial nilpotent orbit, while null regular puncture corresponds to the principal nilpotent orbit.
[^5]: This relation is not strictly true for a general 4d \({\cal N}=2\) SCFT, but we provide evidence for the examples we consider in this paper. See for more detail.
[^6]: We use the Higgs branch label, i.e. a trivial nilpotent orbit represents a full puncture.
[^7]: Here we use the normalized the flavor central charge \(k_F\) so that a free hypermultiplet has \(k_{SU(2)}=1\).
[^8]: Here \((G_1, G_2)\) means that the corresponding BPS quiver is a product of two Dynkin diagrams for \(G_1\) and \(G_2\).
[^9]: For \(J=A_{N-1}\), the character is already considered in.
[^10]: The vertex operator algebra or conformal vertex algebra contains an element called the conformal vector \(\omega = L_{-2} \ket{0}\), which is mapped to the stress tensor: \(Y(\omega, z) = L(z)\)
[^11]: This fails for the quiver gauge theory with loops. | {'timestamp': '2017-12-19T02:07:09', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01607', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01607'} |
null | null |
# Introduction
Clusters of galaxies, the most massive objects in the Universe, are continuously growing, both by the steady accretion of matter from their surrounding environment, and by occasional mergers with smaller sub-clusters. The diffuse intergalactic gas accreted by clusters is rapidly shock heated, giving rise to the hot (\(10^7\)--\(10^8\) K) X-ray emitting intra-cluster medium (ICM) that pervades clusters. The ICM is in approximate virial equilibrium, with the outer boundary of the virialized region-the virial radius-being approximately equal to \(1.3r_{200}\), where within \(r_{200}\) the mean enclosed mass density of the cluster is 200 times the critical density of the Universe at the cluster redshift. Galaxy clusters are also unique astrophysical laboratories that allow us to study nucleosynthesis and the chemical enrichment history of the Universe. The deep gravitational potential wells of galaxy clusters hold all of the metals ever produced by stars in member galaxies, making them archaeological treasure troves to study the integrated history of star formation. The dominant fraction of the metals in clusters currently resides within the hot ICM, which constitutes \(\gtrsim 70\)% of the baryonic mass content for systems above \(1.4\times10^{14}~M_{\odot}\). However, when and how these metals were injected into the intergalactic medium is not well understood. Most of the line emission from metals in the ICM arises from K-and L-shell transitions of highly ionized elements. Because the ICM is in collisional ionization equilibrium and is optically thin, the equivalent widths of the emission lines can be converted directly into elemental abundances. The strongest line emission in the X-ray band is produced by the K-shell transitions of helium-like iron, making it an excellent tracer of chemical enrichment. It has been known for about 40 years that a significant portion of the hot plasma in the central regions of galaxy clusters (the inner \(\sim0.3r_{200}\)) has been enriched by iron produced in stars to about one-third to one-half of the Solar value. In the central regions of clusters with strongly peaked ICM density distributions the abundance of iron is also peaked, but decreases with radius to about one-third Solar beyond about \(0.2r_{200}\). Due to the low X-ray surface brightness in the outskirts of clusters, metal abundance measurements beyond one-half of the virial radius of clusters remain sparse. The best measurements of the Fe abundance distribution at large radii were performed using the *Suzaku* Key Project data (1 Ms observation along 8 azimuthal directions) of the Perseus cluster, which provided 78 data points outside of the cluster core (\(r>0.25r_{200}\)). These data revealed a remarkably uniform iron abundance, as a function of radius and azimuth, that is statistically consistent with a constant value of \(Z_{\rm Fe} = 0.314 \pm 0.012\) Solar out to \(r_{200}\). Subsequent *Suzaku* observations of the Virgo cluster extended these measurements to elements other than iron indicating an uniform chemical composition throughout the cluster volume. The observed homogeneous distribution suggests that most of the metal enrichment of the ICM occurred before the cluster formed and its entropy distribution became stratified, preventing further efficient mixing. A key prediction of this early enrichment scenario is that the ICM in all massive clusters should be uniformly enriched to a similar level . In order to test these predictions, we have analysed all archival observations of nearby galaxy clusters observed with *Suzaku* for which data extend to \(r\sim r_{200}\) and robust measurements based on the Fe-K lines can be performed at \(r > 0.25r_{200}\). (Because the Fe-K complex is by far the strongest line complex in the X-ray spectrum, the word metallicity will in this paper refer to and will be used interchangeably with the Fe abundance.) Our sample spans a redshift range \(z=0.017\)--\(0.183\) and a temperature range of about \(2.5\)--\(9\) keV. The selected temperature range permits metallicity measurement using the Fe-K lines, allowing us to largely avoid multi-temperature biases arising from the measurements of the Fe-L complex. Sect. [2](#sect:metObsanal){reference-type="ref" reference="sect:metObsanal"} describes the data analysis, spectral modeling, and the treatment of the X-ray background. In Sect. [3](#sect:metResults){reference-type="ref" reference="sect:metResults"}, we present the results. Finally, in Sect. [4](#discussion){reference-type="ref" reference="discussion"} and [5](#sect:metConclusions){reference-type="ref" reference="sect:metConclusions"}, we briefly discuss the implications of these results and draw our conclusions.
# Observations and Data Analysis {#sect:metObsanal}
The details of the *Suzaku* observations for each of the 9 clusters analyzed in this study are shown in Tab. [1](#tab:metData){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:metData"}. For each cluster we analyzed the data from all available X-Ray Imaging Spectrometers (XIS 0, 1, 2[^1], 3).
## Data Reduction {#subs:metDataReduction}
We obtained the initial cleaned event lists using the standard criteria provided by the XIS team[^2]. There is a gradual increase in the number of flickering pixels in the XIS detectors with time, which may affect the measurements, if unaccounted for. We used maps provided by the XIS team[^3] to remove the flickering pixels from the cluster observations, as well as from the night Earth observations, which were later used to create the non-X-ray background (NXB) data products. We checked for likely solar wind charge-exchange (SWCX) emission contamination using the WIND Solar Wind Experiment data[^4], following the analysis of . In the case of affected pointings, marked in Tab. [1](#tab:metData){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:metData"}, we only used data above 1.5 keV, where no SWCX emission lines are expected. We filtered out times of low geomagnetic cut-off rigidity (COR\(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}6 GV). Ray-tracing simulations of spatially uniform extended emission were used to perform vignetting corrections. For the XIS 1 data obtained after the reported charge injection level increase on 2011 June 1st, we have excluded two adjacent rows on either side of the charge-injected rows. (The standard is to exclude one row on either side.)
## Image analysis {#subs:metImaging}
We extracted images from all XIS detectors in the \(0.7-7.0\) keV energy band, removing \(\sim30\) arcsec regions around the edges. We extracted instrumental background images in the same energy band from flickering-pixel-subtracted night Earth observations using the tool [xisnxbgen]{.smallcaps}. We subtracted the background images from the cluster images before applying the vignetting correction. The resulting mosaics for each cluster are shown in Figs. [\[fig:a262portrait\]](#fig:a262portrait){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:a262portrait"}--[\[fig:awm7portrait\]](#fig:awm7portrait){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:awm7portrait"}.
## Point Source Detection {#subs:metPsources}
The initial identification of the point sources was carried out using the [ciao]{.smallcaps} tool [wavdetect]{.smallcaps}. We used a single wavelet radius of 1 arcmin, which is approximately matched to the half-power radius of the X-ray telescopes on *Suzaku*. For each cluster we created a candidate set of point sources assuming a source with a radius of 1 arcmin at each of the positions identified by [wavdetect]{.smallcaps}. We then calculated X-ray surface brightness profiles centered on the coordinates in Tab. [\[tab:metClusters\]](#tab:metClusters){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:metClusters"}, excluding the candidate set of point sources, and fitted an isotropic \(\beta\)-model to the surface brightness profile of each cluster: \[S_X=S_0\left[1+\left(\frac{r}{r_c}\right)^2\right]^{(-3\beta+0.5)}+S_{X, \rm bkg}, \label{eqn:beta}\] where \(r\) is the distance from the cluster center and the free parameters are the normalization \(S_0\), the core radius \(r_c\) and \(\beta\). \(S_{X, \rm bkg}\) is the surface brightness of the X-ray background, which is assumed to be constant across the whole area of the cluster. The best-fit parameters for the individual clusters are shown in Tab. [2](#tab:metSx){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:metSx"}.
We divided the mosaic images of the individual clusters by the best-fit surface brightness models and used the resulting residual images to identify by eye sources with radii larger than 1 arcmin. In these cases, we manually increased the sizes of the sources in question by the appropriate amount. The resulting updated sets of point sources (including substructures and artifacts that can appear at chip edges), which were excluded from the subsequent spectral analysis, are shown with magenta circles in Figs [\[fig:a262portrait\]](#fig:a262portrait){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:a262portrait"}--[\[fig:awm7portrait\]](#fig:awm7portrait){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:awm7portrait"}.
## Spectral Analysis {#subs:metSpectral}
For each cluster, we extracted spectra from a series of concentric annular regions centered on the respective cluster's centre (see Tab. [\[tab:metClusters\]](#tab:metClusters){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:metClusters"}). The width of the annuli was set to be at least 3 arcmin, with each annulus containing at least 3500 cluster counts, allowing us, in principle, to measure the Fe abundance with a relative uncertainty of at most \(20\%\). The resulting annuli are shown in yellow in Figs. [\[fig:a262portrait\]](#fig:a262portrait){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:a262portrait"}--[\[fig:awm7portrait\]](#fig:awm7portrait){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:awm7portrait"}. Instrumental background spectra were created using Night Earth observations. We rebinned each spectrum to a minimum of one count per bin, employing the extended C-statistic in the fitting. For each spectrum, we constructed an individual response matrix with a resolution of 16 eV, spanning the \(0.2-9.5\) keV energy band[^5]. We used the task [xissimarfgen]{.smallcaps} (version 2010-11-05) to create ancillary response files (assuming uniform emission from a circular region with the radius of 20 arcmin). We used [xspec]{.smallcaps} to model the spectra. For each cluster we modeled all spectra simultaneously, using the \(0.7-7.0\) keV band for the front illuminated XIS 0, XIS 2 and XIS 3 detectors, and the \(0.6-7.0\) keV band for the back illuminated XIS 1, except for observations with possible SWCX contamination (see Tab. [1](#tab:metData){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:metData"}), where we used the \(1.5-7.0\) keV energy band. We modeled the ICM emission in each annulus as a single temperature plasma in collisional ionisation equilibrium using the absorbed [apec (ATOMDB 3.0.3)]{.smallcaps} model. For a given annulus, we used a single temperature and metallicity. Normalizations were allowed to vary among individual observations, but were tied among the detectors in a single observation; in other words, all spectra from a given observation were members of a single fitting group in [xspec]{.smallcaps}. We used the abundance table of in the analysis. Galactic absorption was set to the average column along the line of sight inferred from the Leiden/Argentine/Bonn Survey. The uncertainties in all derived parameters were determined using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations. After removing the burn in period and thinning each chain, we used the mean and the standard deviation as the value and the uncertainty of each derived parameter, respectively.
## Modeling the X-ray Foreground and Background {#subs:metCxfb}
At large clustercentric radii, the cosmic X-ray foreground/background (CXFB) makes up a dominant fraction of the total X-ray emission, requiring careful modeling. Our spectral model for the CXFB included four components--an absorbed power law (PL) due to the unresolved point sources, an absorbed thermal component modeling the Galactic halo emission, a potential 0.6 keV foreground component that we will from now on refer to as the hot foreground, and an unabsorbed thermal component modeling the emission from the local hot bubble. In order to better constrain the low-temperature CXFB components, we used the X-Ray Background Tool[^6], which calculates the average X-ray background spectra from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey diffuse background maps. For each cluster we obtained spectra from six independent circular regions with radii \(R=1.3r_{200}\) evenly surrounding the cluster so that each touches the outer edge of a circle with radius \(r=1.3r_{200}\) centered on the cluster core, as well as two neighbouring background regions. The distance from the cluster core ensures that the spectra are not significantly contaminated by emission from the ICM. This setup, as opposed to using a single annular region, allowed us to assign separate absorptions to each of the six regions, which can potentially significantly influence the modeling at *ROSAT* energies, \(0.7-2.0\) keV. As stated before, for each cluster we modeled all spectra simultaneously, including the CXFB model. To limit the systematic effects that might potentially influence the fit, we first separately determined the PL parameters, that were kept fixed during the subsequent modeling. To do this, we used the spectra from the outermost annulus in a given cluster in the high energy band, \(2.0-7.0\) keV, where the PL component is dominant at large clustercentric radii. For six of the clusters in our sample, A 133, A 1689, A 1795, A 2029, A 2142, and A 2204, the outermost annulus covers only regions outside \(r_{200}\). In these cases, we assumed no significant cluster emission to contribute to the spectrum and therefore the high energy fit included only the PL model. For the remaining clusters, A 262, AWM 7 and Hydra A, we accounted for potential cluster emission by including an [apec]{.smallcaps} component in the high energy fit, fixing its temperature to \(kT=2\) keV and keeping the normalizations in the individual observations free. The best-fit PL parameters are shown in the first two columns of Tab. [\[tab:metCxfb\]](#tab:metCxfb){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:metCxfb"}. In the subsequent spectral modeling, the remaining CXFB parameters were kept free and tied among all spectra from a given cluster, with the exception of the metallicity and the redshift of the three thermal components, which were fixed at unity and zero, respectively. For each cluster, we tied together the ICM temperatures and Fe abundances in the neighboring annuli where required in order to obtain a statistically significant constraint. The final CXFB model parameters for the individual clusters are listed in Tab. [\[tab:metCxfb\]](#tab:metCxfb){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:metCxfb"}.
## Criteria For Robust Metallicity Measurements {#subs:metTrimming}
In each cluster we formally obtained profiles of temperature and metallicity out to the outermost radii reached by the observations. However, due to the low surface brightness of the ICM, the measurements at large radii may be significantly influenced by systematic uncertainties, such as potential variations of the CXFB model throughout the cluster. To address our main scientific questions, it is therefore crucial to only use the metallicity measurements which we are confident about. We used the following criteria to identify these measurements:
- We only used the measurements at radii \(r>0.25r_{200}\) to avoid the central metallicity peak observed in most cool-core galaxy clusters. We used a similar radial range in the Perseus cluster, where metallicity measurements inside \(20'\) (\(r_{200}=82'\)) were discarded.
- We only used annuli with ICM-signal-to-background (ISB) ratios around the Fe-K lines higher than 10%. This is defined as the ratio of the total number of modeled counts received from the ICM to the sum of modeled counts from the CXFB and the instrumental background, in a 1 keV wide energy band centered on the appropriately redshifted Fe-K line (rest energy \(E=6.7\,\text{keV}\)). The top right panels in Figs. [\[fig:a262portrait\]](#fig:a262portrait){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:a262portrait"}--[\[fig:awm7portrait\]](#fig:awm7portrait){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:awm7portrait"} show the profiles of the ISB ratios for the individual annuli (in blue), as well as the ratios for the individual observations (in red). The 10% threshold is broadly consistent with the measurements in the outermost regions of the Perseus cluster.
- Finally, we only used the annuli where the contamination from the neighbouring regions due to the wings of the broad point spread function (PSF) of the telescopes is small. The half-power diameter (HPD) of the X-ray Telescopes (XRT) on board of *Suzaku* is \(\sim2'\), which causes a fraction of the emission from an object to be registered elsewhere on the detector. Addressing this issue is especially important in the cool core clusters at relatively large distances (\(z\gtrsim0.1\)), since the emission from the metal-rich X-ray surface brightness peak may bias spectral measurements out to larger radii. To test for this, we used *Chandra* surface brightness profiles with high spatial resolution relative to *Suzaku* (binned to \(\sim4''\)), which we convolved with a simple Gaussian model for the *Suzaku* point-spread function with a HPD of 2 arcmin. Using this model, for each of our annuli we calculated the fraction of emission that we expected to come from the other annuli, and removed those where it exceeded 10%. Only the two most distant clusters in our sample, A 2204 and A 1689, were affected. For both systems, we removed the measurements immediately outside \(0.25r_{200}\) from the subsequent analysis.
\
:::
\(^\dagger\) [\[metaltable\]]{#metaltable label="metaltable"}
# Results {#sect:metResults}
The best fit normalizations, temperatures and metallicities for the individual clusters are shown in the bottom panels of Figures [\[fig:a262portrait\]](#fig:a262portrait){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:a262portrait"}--[\[fig:awm7portrait\]](#fig:awm7portrait){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:awm7portrait"}. Most of the systems in our sample are so-called cooling core clusters with bright, relatively cool, metal-rich cores. To the iron abundance measurements in this work, we also added the iron abundances measured for the non-cool core Coma cluster by. Fig. [\[fig:radial\]](#fig:radial){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:radial"} shows all metallicity measurements in our cluster sample plotted as a function of radius scaled to \(r_{200}\). The average metallicity (shown with the solid blue line) peaks in the central region and decreases as a function of radius, flattening at radii \(r>0.25r_{200}\). We tested our results for biases associated with possible multi-temperature structure by fitting the data both in the full spectral band and above 2 keV. At radii \(r>0.25r_{200}\) the two fits provided consistent results, indicating that cooler temperature components do not contribute significantly to the observed emission in the cluster outskirts. After excluding the measurements at \(r<0.25r_{200}\) and using all criteria outlined in the previous section, we are left with 26 individual metallicity measurements from 10 different clusters. These measurements are shown in Table [3](#metaltable){reference-type="ref" reference="metaltable"} and Fig. [\[fig:metConservative\]](#fig:metConservative){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:metConservative"} where the clusters have been ordered by mass from the least to the most massive. There is no evidence for any trend in metallicity as a function of cluster mass. The measurements are consistent with being constant at \(Z_{\rm Fe}=0.316\pm0.012\) Solar, with \(\chi^2=28.85\) for 25 degrees of freedom. This best fit value is statistically consistent with \(Z_{\rm Fe}=0.314\pm0.012\) Solar reported for the Perseus cluster, shown as a dashed line in Fig. [\[fig:radial\]](#fig:radial){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:radial"}.
# Discussion
We find that across our sample of 10 clusters of galaxies the Fe abundances measured outside the central regions (\(r>0.25r_{200}\)) are consistent with a constant value, \(Z=0.316\pm0.012\) Solar (Fig. [\[fig:radial\]](#fig:radial){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:radial"}). The metallicity measurements also show no significant trend with temperature (Fig. [\[fig:metConservative\]](#fig:metConservative){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:metConservative"}). Based on the uniform iron abundance distribution in the Perseus cluster, both as a function of radius and azimuth, statistically consistent with a constant value of \(Z_{\rm Fe} = 0.314\pm0.012\) Solar out to \(r_{200}\), proposed that most of the metal enrichment of the intergalactic medium occurred before clusters formed, probably more than ten billion years ago (\(z>2\)), during the period of maximal star formation and black hole activity. A key prediction of the early enrichment scenario is that the ICM in all massive clusters should be uniformly enriched to a similar level. Previous indications for a uniform ICM enrichment include the small cluster to cluster scatter in the Fe abundance observed within \(r_{500}\) and the observed pre-enrichment of the ICM between the clusters Abell 399/401. Our observation of a constant iron abundance at large radii across a sample of 26 independent measurements for ten massive clusters further confirms this early enrichment scenario. This early enrichment could have been driven by galactic winds which would be strongest around the peak of star formation and AGN activity. Recent numerical simulations by and indicate that while star-formation and supernova feedback are unable to enrich the intergalactic medium uniformly, simulations which also include feedback from AGN produce remarkably homogeneous metallicity distribution in the ICM out to large radii. They show that the uniform metallicity is the result of a widespread displacement of metal-rich gas by powerful AGN outbursts that occure *before* the epoch of maximal star-formation and AGN activity. conclude that early AGN feedback acting on high-redshift (\(z > 2\)) small haloes, with shallow gravitational potential wells, was particularly efficient in spreading and mixing the metals. Given the complexity of the physics of the chemical enrichment processes, these simulation results should probably be considered tentative. However, our measurements provide an important anchor with which the results of these and future simulations can be compared, bringing more understanding into the process of chemical enrichment. The constant ratios of abundances of several elements observed throughout the Virgo cluster as well as in the radial profiles of 44 clusters observed out to intermediate radii with *XMM-Newton* reveal that, during the early period of metal enrichment, the products of core-collapse and type Ia supernovae were well mixed. The estimated ratio between the number of SN Ia and the total number of supernovae enriching the ICM is about 15--20%, generally consistent with the metal abundance patterns in our own Galaxy and only marginally lower than the SN Ia contribution estimated for the cluster cores. The most direct way to confirm the early enrichment scenario is to measure the core-excluded metallicity of clusters as a function of redshift. Contrary to initial findings, under the early enrichment scenario, there should be no substantial redshift evolution in the ICM metallicity outside the central regions of clusters, out to \(z \sim 2\). Recent results indicate that most metals in the ICM were already in place at \(z = 1\), consistent with the picture of an early enrichment. At various overdensities, the chemical enrichment might proceed on different time scales or with different initial mass functions, resulting in a trend with cluster mass. Within the mass range probed by our sample (factor of \(\sim10\)), there is no evidence for dependence of ICM metallicity on total cluster mass. A more thorough analysis of the mass dependence will require reliable measurements of absolute abundances in low mass clusters and groups of galaxies, which are often made difficult for current CCD instruments by multi-temperature structure in the ICM. A lack of trend with cluster mass would either indicate a rate of metal enrichment in the early Universe that is independent of the density contrast between different regions, or a very high efficiency of mixing on large scales. If the ICM at large radii is clumpy and multiphase then its best fit metallicity, derived using a single temperature model, might be biased. The best fit Fe abundance is the most significantly biased at temperatures around 1 keV, where its value is determined based on the Fe-L lines, which are very sensitive to the underlying temperature structure. The metallicities of the clusters in our sample are determined using the Fe-K lines and depending on the temperature structure could be biased by at most 30 per cent. The fact that the spectral fits in the full band and above 2 keV give consistent results (see Section [3](#sect:metResults){reference-type="ref" reference="sect:metResults"}) indicates that if substantially cooler, denser clumps are present in the ICM, they do not contribute significantly to the observed emission measure and the metal budget. In the near future, the metallicities of groups and cooler clusters could be further studied with the *Astrosat* satellite. The low earth orbit and the small inclination of the orbital plane of *Astrosat* provide a low and stable background environment that is required for cluster outskirts studies. The large field of view provides a sufficient grasp, enabling mapping the faint X-ray emission in the outskirts of nearby clusters that span large angular scales in the sky. Such observations will further test the possible mass-dependence of metallicity. Deep observations with *XMM-Newton* and *Chandra* will allow us to precisely determine the metallicity outside the cores of high redshift clusters, providing further constraints on the redshift evolution of metallicity. Observations with high spectral resolution obtained with the *X-ray Astronomy Recovery Mission (XARM)* will allow more accurately measured relative abundance ratios for clusters at low redshifts, testing our models of nucleosynthesis. In the further future, missions like *Athena* or *Lynx*[^7] will allow detailed studies of metal abundances in high redshift clusters, providing comprehensive understanding of the metal cycle in the Universe.
# Conclusions {#sect:metConclusions}
Here, we report 26 independent metallicity measurements in the outskirts (\(r>0.25r_{200}\)) of ten nearby galaxy clusters. These measurements are consistent with a constant value \(Z_{\rm Fe}=0.316\pm0.012\) Solar. No significant trend of metallicity versus temperature or mass is observed. Our results corroborate the conclusions drawn from previous metallicity measurements at large radii in the Perseus cluster. In particular, they confirm the predictions of an early enrichment scenario, where the majority of metal enrichment occurs before the cluster formation, at \(z>2\). | {'timestamp': '2017-06-16T02:02:34', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01567', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01567'} |
null | null |
# Introduction {#int}
The proper accounting for spectral lines is a keypoint of hot-plasma modelling, for radiative transfer (mostly through Rosseland mean opacities), and more generally for absorption and emission spectroscopy, where they are used as a diagnostic tool to infer the temperature (from ratios of line intensities) and density (from line widths) of plasmas. The applications range from inertial confinement fusion, magnetic confinement fusion (for the radiative losses in the W-coated tiles of divertor) and astrophysics. Heating by fusion reactions deep within stellar cores produces thermal X-ray radiation and models of stellar structure and evolution are very sensitive to radiative transfer and opacity. Matter at extreme densities and temperatures gives us a chance to study important and exotic physical processes: plasmon neutrinos as a test of electro-weak theory at low-energies, turbulent energy transport in high-gravity environments, dark matter in the form of axions and/or WIMPS, *etc.*. Exploration of extreme physics in star interiors is possible thanks to asteroseismology. The Cepheid stars (named after \(\delta\) Cephei) are known to be used to estimate the stellar distances. They have been better understood after a revision by a factor two of the opacity for species of atomic number \(Z>2\) confirmed by the first measurements of absorption coefficients. The \(\beta\) Cephei-type stars (which should not be confused with Cepheid variables), also known as \(\beta\) Cepheids and named after \(\beta\) Cephei (or Alfirk) are now of primary interest due to the correlation between the frequencies of the excited modes and the mass of these stars for a given age. Such stars are now used to estimate the age of several young open clusters. In \(\beta\) Cephei-type stars, the iron-group (chromium, iron and nickel) opacity peak (when plotting Rosseland opacity with respect to temperature) excites acoustic modes through the "kappa-mechanism". With the recent revision of solar chemical abundances, the standard stellar model fails to reproduce the helioseismic results. Among the possible explanations, an increase of 5 to 20 % of the opacity in the solar radiative zone would be sufficient to reconcile the modelling and the asteroseismic observations. Several absorption spectroscopy measurements were performed recently on the Z machine at Sandia National Laboratory by Bailey *e*t al. at conditions similar to those at the boundary between the convective and radiative zones of the Sun. In that region, iron is responsible for 25 % of the total opacity. One of those experiments, published in 2015 revealed that, in the spectral range between 7 and 12.7 Å, the opacity inferred from the measurements was higher than the opacity predicted by all the best codes in the world by 30 to 400 %. Highly charged iron produces some of the brightest X-ray emission lines from hot astrophysical objects, including galaxy clusters and stellar coronae, and dominates the emission of the Sun at wavelengths near 15 Å. The Fe XVII spectrum is, however, poorly fitted by the best astrophysical models. A particular problem has been that the strongest Fe XVII line is weaker than predicted. This has affected the interpretation of observations by the Chandra and XMM-Newton orbiting X-ray missions, fuelling a continuing controversy over whether this discrepancy is caused by an incomplete modelling of the plasma environment in these objects or by shortcomings in the treatment of the underlying atomic physics. Of course, iron is not the only element we are interested in. To explore the history of star formation in our galaxy, cosmochronology estimates the ages of the coolest white dwarf stars. Measuring relative line shapes of H\(_{\beta}\), H\(_{\gamma}\), and H\(_{\delta}\) enables one to determine white dwarf photospheric and atmospheric conditions. In Sec. [1.1](#rad){reference-type="ref" reference="rad"}, the different processes contributing to radiative opacity are introduced, and the detailed opacity code SCO-RCG is presented. Throughout the last years, the code was used to interpret several laser or Z-pinch experiments, as shown in Sec. [2](#exp){reference-type="ref" reference="exp"}. In Sec. [3](#env){reference-type="ref" reference="env"}, we discuss the role of opacities for the modelling of stellar envelopes, and present the kappa mechanism, responsible for the pulsations of particular stars. In Sec. [4](#bou){reference-type="ref" reference="bou"}, the importance of the opacity at the boundary between convective and radiative zones of the Sun (also named "tachocline" ) is outlined, and theoretical efforts dedicated to understanding the experiment performed recently on the Z machine at Sandia National Laboratory are detailed in Sec. [5](#bai){reference-type="ref" reference="bai"}. The enigma of the ratio between two important iron lines, characteristic of the corona of the Sun and of other stars such as \(\alpha\) Aurigae (Capella) or \(\beta\) Canis Majoris (Procyon), is briefly mentioned in Sec. [6](#3c3){reference-type="ref" reference="3c3"}, and the need for Stark-broadening modelling of hydrogen Balmer lines is recalled in Sec. [7](#whi){reference-type="ref" reference="whi"}.
## Radiative opacity {#rad}
The spectral opacity is the photo-absorption cross-section per mass unit, usually expressed in cm\(^2\)/g. The total frequency-dependent opacity can be calculated as the sum of the contributions of different processes: photo-excitation \(\kappa_{\mathrm{bb}}\), photo-ionization \(\kappa_{\mathrm{bf}}\), inverse Bremsstrahlung \(\kappa_{\mathrm{ff}}\) and photon scattering \(\kappa_{\mathrm{scat}}\). It is then given by the following expression: \[\kappa'(h\nu)=\kappa(h\nu)\left(1-e^{-\left(h\nu/k_BT\right)}\right)+\kappa_{\mathrm{scat}}(h\nu),\] where \(h\) the Planck constant, \(k_B\) the Boltzmann constant, \(T\) the temperature, \(\nu\) the photon frequency and \[\kappa(h\nu)=\kappa_{\mathrm{bb}}(h\nu)+\kappa_{\mathrm{bf}}(h\nu)+\kappa_{\mathrm{ff}}(h\nu).\] Photo-excitation and de-excitation can be described as \[X_i^{q+}+h\nu \leftrightharpoons X_j^{q+},\] where \(X_i^{q+}\) is an ion with charge \(q\) in an excitation state \(i\). The signature of the emitted or absorbed photon \(h\nu\) is a spectral line. The relevant atomic parameter for the direct and inverse processes is the oscillator strength (\(f\)), and one has \[\kappa_{\mathrm{bb}}(h\nu)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{\mathcal{N}_A}{A}\frac{\pi e^2h}{mc}\sum_{i\rightarrow j}\mathcal{P}_if_{i\rightarrow j}\Psi_{i\rightarrow j}(h\nu),\] where \(\mathcal{P}_i\) is the population of initial level \(i\), \(f_{i\rightarrow j}\) the oscillator strength and \(\Psi_{i\rightarrow j}\) the profile of the spectral line corresponding to the transition \(i\rightarrow j\), accounting for broadening mechanisms (Doppler, Stark,\...). \(\epsilon_0\) is the dielectric constant, \(\mathcal{N}_A\) the Avogadro number, \(e\) and \(m\) represent respectively the electron charge and mass, \(c\) the speed of light and \(A\) the atomic mass of the considered element. Photo-ionization is a process that occurs when a bound electron \(e^-\) is ejected after absorption of a photon \[X_i^{q+}+h\nu \leftrightharpoons X_j^{(q+1)+}+e^-.\] The inverse process is radiative recombination (RR), occuring when a free electron recombines with an ion along with emission of a photon. This can occur via an intermediate excited state as \[e^-+X_i^{q+}\leftrightharpoons \left(X_j^{(q-1)+*}\right)\leftrightharpoons \left\{\begin{array}{ll} e^-+X_k^{q+} & AI\\ X_m^{(q-1)+}+h\nu & DR \end{array}\right..\] A colliding electron excites the target and attaches to form the short-lived autoionizing state (\*), which may be doubly excited, but not necessarily: it is only required for it to lie above the first ionization limit, and to be able to decay radiatively to bound states. The intermediate state decays either by autoionization (AI) where the electron becomes free and the target drops to ground state, or by dielectronic recombination (DR) where the electron gets bound by emitting a photon. Photo-ionization resonances can be seen in absorption spectra and DR resonances in emission spectra. The opacity involves also two other processes, inverse Bremsstrahlung or free-free absorption, and photon-electron scattering. Bremsstrahlung refers to the radiation emitted by an electron slowing down in the electromagnetic field of an ion. The inverse process occurs when a free electron and an ion absorb a photon \[h\nu+\left[X_i^{q+}+e^-(\epsilon)\right]\rightarrow X_j^{q+}+e^-\left(\epsilon'\right),\] \(\epsilon\) and \(\epsilon'\) being the energies of the free electron before and after the photo-absorption. Calculations of the free-free cross-section involve quantities related to the elastic-scattering matrix elements for electron-impact excitation of ions. The detailed (fine-structure) opacity code SCO-RCG enables one to compute precise opacities for the calculation of accurate Rosseland means (see Sec. [3.2](#ross){reference-type="ref" reference="ross"}). The (super-)configurations are generated by the SCO code on the basis of a statistical fluctuation theory (see the details below) and a self-consistent computation of atomic structure is performed for all the configurations. In such a way, each configuration has its own set of wavefunctions. The latests are determined in a single-configuration approximation. One peculiarity of the code is that it does not rely on the "isolated atom" picture, but on a realistic atom-in-plasma modelling (equation of state). Relativistic effects are taken into account in the Pauli approximation. The DLA (Detailed Line Accounting) part of the spectrum is performed using an adapted version of the RCG routine from Cowan's suite of atomic-structure and spectra codes. The RCG source code was used for decades by spectroscopists, it has many available options and is well documented. In SCO-RCG, criteria are defined to select transition arrays that can be treated line-by-line. The data required for the calculation of the detailed transition arrays (Slater, spin-orbit and dipolar integrals) are obtained from SCO, providing in this way a consistent description of the plasma screening effects on the wavefunctions. Then, the level energies and the lines are calculated by RCG. The computation starts with an average-atom calculation in local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE), which provides the average populations of the subshells. We then build a list of super-configurations of the kind \[\label{sc} (1s)^{p_1}(2s)^{p_2}...\left(n_{k-1}\ell_{k-1}\right)^{p_{k-1}}\left(\prod_{i=k}^Nn_i\ell_i\right)^{p_k},\] each super-configuration containing \(k\) supershells and \(N\) subshells, where \(n_N\ell_N\) is the last highest-energy subshell found by the average-atom calculation at the given density and temperature. A super-configuration is made of supershells (a supershell being a group of subshells) populated by electrons. In Eq. ([\[sc\]](#sc){reference-type="ref" reference="sc"}), the first \((k-1)\) supershells are ordinary subshells and the last \((N-k+1)\) subshells are gathered in the same supershell. We use the LTE fluctuation theory around the average-atom non-integer populations in order to determine the range of variation of the populations \(p_k\), \(k\)=1, \(N\) and therefore the possible list of configurations (if \(p_N\) is equal to zero) or super-configurations (if \(p_N\) is strictly positive). The super-configurations are then sorted according to their Boltzmann weights, estimated using the average-atom wavefunctions. We only keep the \(N\) (super-)configurations having the highests weights. The strength of this approach is that it enables one to take into account many highly excited states and satellite lines. The populations of those states may be small, but their number is so huge that they can play a significant role in the opacity. The orbitals in the Rydberg supershell are chosen in a way so that they weakly interact with inner orbitals. A DLA calculation is performed if possible and necessary for all the transition arrays starting from the configuration; DLA computations are carried out only for pairs of configurations giving rise to less than 800,000 lines. In other cases, transition arrays are represented by Gaussian profiles in the UTA (Unresolved Transition Array ) or SOSA (Spin-Orbit Split Array ) formalisms. If the Rydberg supershell contains at least one electron, then transitions starting from the super-configuration are taken into account by the Super Transition Array (STA) model. The amount of detailed calculations performed in SCO-RCG is now largely dominant. The PRTA (Partially Resolved Transition Array) model was recently implemented. It enables one to replace many statistical transition arrays by small-scale DLA calculations. We have extended this approach to the STA formalism, consisting in omitting the Rydberg supershell in the computation, and adding its contribution to the widths of all lines. The contribution of the Rydberg supershell is included as a Gaussian "dressing function". We have also the possibility to replace this dressing function by a coarse grained configurationally resolved profile, following the CRSTA (Configurationally Resolved Transition Array) method.
# Interpretation of experiments {#exp}
In the experiment by Davidson *et al.*, the laser beams were produced by a neodymium-doped glass laser system, HELEN, delivering about 100 J of 1.06 \(\mu\)m radiation in 300 ps, which is converted to about 60 J of 0.53 \(\mu\)m light incident on a target, in each of its two beams. One beam is used to directly irradiate a thin layer of gold (500 Å) producing X-rays that serve as an heating source for an aluminum sample (0.2-0.5 \(\mu m\)). A layer of plastic is included (0.25 \(\mu m\)), which is largely transparent to these X rays but remains at a higher density than the critical density associated with the laser radiation, in order to ensure that the sample is heated entirely by X rays and not by laser light. The sample foil itself is clad in plastic (0.3 \(\mu\)m) to constrain the foil expansion and produce a more uniform density. The measured quantity is the transmisison of the sample, obtained from \[T(h\nu)=\frac{I(h\nu)}{I_0},\] where \(I(h\nu)\) is the attenuated intensity of the probe (backlighter) radiation and \(I_0\) the reference intensity. The transmission can be related to opacity, for an homogeneous plasma in which reabsorption processes can be neglected, by Beer-Lambert-Bouguer's law: \[T(h\nu)=e^{-\rho L\kappa(h\nu)},\] where \(\rho\) is the density of the material and \(L\) its thickness. Figure [\[Al_Eidmann2+davidson3\]](#Al_Eidmann2+davidson3){reference-type="ref" reference="Al_Eidmann2+davidson3"} (left) shows that the spectrum can be interpreted with a rather high accuracy (except maybe as concerns the main feature around 1530 eV) using SCO-RCG at a single temperature and a single density. The spectrally-resolved transmission of aluminum was measured in the range of 70 to 280 eV at \(\rho\)=0.01 g/cm\(^3\) and \(T\)=22 eV. For this purpose, the iodine laser ASTERIX IV (200 J energy with pulse duration 0.4 ns at 400 nm) was focused into a spherical gold cavity with a diameter of 3 mm. The generated radiation with a temperature \(T_R\approx\) 60 eV heated thin tamped absorber foils, which were probed by the radiation of a backlighter source. In contrast to the X-ray range (around 1 keV) in which many experiments were performed using crystal spectroscopy, the spectral range below 1 keV is much less explored. It requires reliable XUV diagnostics and sufficient suppression of self-emission of the heated sample. On the other hand, it is this spectral range, which determines the Rosseland and Planck mean opacities, *i.e.* the radiative transfer. As can be seen in Fig. [\[Al_Eidmann2+davidson3\]](#Al_Eidmann2+davidson3){reference-type="ref" reference="Al_Eidmann2+davidson3"} (right), the spectrum can be analyzed taking into account a temperature variation of 6 eV. X-ray transmission spectrum of copper was measured at "Laboratoire d'Utilisation des Lasers Intenses" (LULI) in France at the LULI2000 laser facility with an improved design of indirect heating. The sample is a thin foil of mid-Z material inserted between two gold cavities heated by two 300 J, frequency-doubled (*i.e.* the wavelength of the laser is \(\lambda\)=0.526 \(\mu\)m for a better X-ray conversion efficiency) nanosecond laser beams. A third laser beam irradiates a gold foil to create a spectrally continuous X-ray source (backlight) used to probe the sample. Figure [\[calculs_tir69\]](#calculs_tir69){reference-type="ref" reference="calculs_tir69"} shows an interpretation of the transmission of a multi-layer sample made of different materials: C (70 nm)/Al (38 nm)/Cu (12 nm)/Al (38 nm)/C (70 nm). There are several benefits in resorting to Z-pinch radiation for opacity measurements, including relatively large cm-scale lateral sample sizes and relatively long 3-5 ns experiments durations. Indeed, these characteristics enhance sample uniformity. The spectrally resolved transmission through a CH-tamped NaBr foil was measured by Bailey *et al.* at the Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) and published in 2003. The Z-pinch produced the X rays for both the heating and backlight sources. There is a good agreement between observed and synthetic (SCO-RCG) spectra in the region were the \(n\)=2 to 3, 4 transitions in bromine ionized into the M shell are exprected to occur (see Fig. [\[BaileyT2_new_fr_2bis\]](#BaileyT2_new_fr_2bis){reference-type="ref" reference="BaileyT2_new_fr_2bis"}). The ratio between the two main structures (\(2p_{1/2}\rightarrow 3d_{3/2}\) and \(2p_{3/2}\rightarrow 3d_{5/2}\)) is highly sensitive to relativistic configuration interaction (*i.e.* Coulomb interaction between relativistic subconfigurations of a non-relativistic configuration). In 2007, Bailey *et al.* reported on iron transmission measurements at inferred \(T\)= 156 eV and \(n_e\)=6.9\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{21}\) cm\(^{-3}\) over the photon energy range \(h\nu\approx\) 800-1800 eV. The samples consisted of an Fe/Mg mixture fully tamped on both sides by a 10 \(\mu m\) thick parylene-N (C\(_8\)H\(_8\)). The Fe/Mg mixture was fabricated by depositing 10 alternating Mg and Fe layers. The challenges of high-temperature opacity experiments were overcome here using the dynamic hohlraum X-ray source at the SNL Z facility (see Fig. [\[Z\]](#Z){reference-type="ref" reference="Z"}). The process entails accelerating an annular tungsten Z-pinch plasma radially inward onto a cylindrical low density CH\(_2\) foam, launching a radiating shock propagating toward the cylinder axis. Radiation trapped by the tungsten plasma forms a hohlraum and a sample attached on the top diagnostic aperture is heated during \(\approx\) 9 ns when the shock is propagating inward and the radiation temperature rises above 200 eV. The radiation at the stagnation is used to probe the sample. The experimental spectrum was well reproduced by many fine-structure opacity codes (see Fig. [\[fitBaileywithorwithoutSCO\]](#fitBaileywithorwithoutSCO){reference-type="ref" reference="fitBaileywithorwithoutSCO"} for the comparison with SCO-RCG). The features around 12.4 Å were not reproduced by any of the involved codes. Hot, solid density aluminum plasmas were generated using a 4\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{18}\) W/cm\(^2\), 350 fs laser pulse at ELFIE laser facility in LULI in France. Ultra-high intensity (UHI) laser pulses are efficient tools to reach states of matter associated with stellar opacities. The mechanisms whereby the laser-accelerated electrons propagate and deposit their energy through the target are different from those in the ns-pulse heating. The non-thermal, high-energy electron density is usually high enough so that, in addition to the direct collisions with the target particles, the dominant heating process is the ohmic dissipation of the inductive return current formed by collisional background electrons. Time-integrated K-shell spectra and time-resolved He\(_\beta\) line emission were used to infer the plasma parameters following the laser irradiation. A suite of simulation tools was employed to describe the laser-solid interaction and the subsequent radiative-hydrodynamic processes. The space-time integrated intensity spectrum is well reproduced by SCO-RCG for a mean temperature of 310 eV (see Fig. [\[fig_uhi\]](#fig_uhi){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_uhi"}). The intensity is computed here as \[I(h\nu)=B(h\nu)\times\left[1-e^{-\rho L_1\kappa(h\nu)}\right]\times S_e\times\Delta t/h,\] where \(B(h\nu)\) (erg/cm\(^2\)/sr) represents Planck's distribution function, \(\rho\) (g/cm\(^ 3\)) is the density of the material, \(L_1\) (cm) its reabsorption length, \(S_e\) (cm\(^3\)) the emissive surface, \(\Delta t\) (s) the emission duration and \(h\) the Planck constant expressed in eV.s. The structure around 1720 eV corresponds to Ly\(_{\alpha}\) and the structure around 1850 eV to He\(_{\beta}\).
# Stellar envelopes {#env}
## \(\kappa\) mechanism
The opacity of the "iron group" (Cr, Fe, Ni and Cu) for \(T\approx\) 2-3\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^5\) K and \(\rho\approx\) 10\(^{-7}\)-10\(^{-6}\) g/cm\(^3\) is particularly important for envelopes of \(\beta\) Cephei (\(\beta\) Canis Majoris) stars, such as \(\nu\) Eridani, \(\gamma\) Pegasi, \(\beta\) Crucis, \(\beta\) Centauri, *etc.*, which are hot blue-white stars of spectral class B. Their mass is from 8 to 20 M\(_{\odot}\) and their magnitude from +3.16 to +3.27. \(\beta\) Cephei are pulsating stars, progenitors of type II supernovae, and their period is about 4.57 hours. They pulsate through the \(\kappa\) mechanism, due to M-shell transitions in elements of the iron group, which induce, when plotting Rosseland mean opacity as a function of \(\log\)(temperature in K), an opacity bump. The shape and position of this bump are very sensitive to the mass, the metallicity (fraction of mass that is not in hydrogen or helium) and the age of the considered star, showing that a precise determination of these three parameters as well as the proper knowledge of the opacities are required to understand the structure and evolution of the star. The first difficulty in interpreting their oscillation spectrum comes from the fact that some modes are observed but not predicted by stellar models. Opacity drives the pulsations of many variable stars. In cases where the opacity increases with \(T\), the atmosphere becomes unstable against pulsations. The kappa mechanism proceeds in several steps: 1. The inward motion of a layer of the star tends to compress the layer and increase the density \(\rho\). 2. The layer becomes more opaque, the flux from the deeper layers gets stuck in the high opacity (\(\kappa\)) region. 3. This heat increase causes a build-up of pressure that pushes the layer back out again. 4. The layer expands, cools and becomes more transparent to radiation. 5. Energy and pressure beneath the layer diminish. 6. The layer falls inward and the cycle repeats. There is a renewal in the kappa mechanism studies since the launch of COROT (2006) which is the first satellite dedicated to the development of asteroseismology and search for exoplanets. This mechanism is responsible for the pulsational instability of stars between 1.5 and 20 M\(_{\odot}\). In the external optically thick layers, the diffusion approximation is justified and the variation of radiation flux \(F_R\) is related to luminosity \(L_r\) by \[\delta\mathrm{div}F_R=\frac{1}{4\pi r^2}\frac{d\delta L_r}{L_r},\] where \[\frac{\delta L_r}{L_r}=\frac{dr}{d\ln T}-\frac{d\kappa}{\kappa}+A\left(\frac{\delta T}{T}+\frac{\delta r}{r}\right).\] The first term describes the radiative dissipation and in fact stabilizes the star, the term \(\delta T/T\) (sometimes referred to as \(\gamma\) mechanism) describes the direct influence of the temperature variation on the luminosity (this effect is usually small), \(\kappa\) represents the Rosseland mean opacity, \(A\) is a constant, and the last term contributes to the instability because the radiating area is reduced in case of the compression. The \(\kappa\) mechanism will work if the opacity varies more quickly with radius than the other terms. Two kinds of excitation are possible: the opacity bump due to the ionization of He (He II or He III), this is the so-called Eddington valve, at \(\log T\approx\) 4.5 (\(T\) in K), excites the evolved Cepheids, RR Lyrae (low mass evolved stars) and the \(\delta\) Scuti stars (1.5-2.5 M\(_{\odot}\) main-sequence stars) or the opacity bump is due to the M shell of iron at \(\log T\approx\) 5.2, which excites the \(\beta\) Cephei (see Fig. [\[Alfirk\]](#Alfirk){reference-type="ref" reference="Alfirk"}) stars (7-20 M\(_{\odot}\) main-sequence stars), "Slowly Pulsating B" stars (SPB, 3-9 M\(_{\odot}\) main-sequence stars) and "B-type subdwarf" (sdB, helium core, 0.5-1.4 M\(_{\odot}\)). The latter are representative of a late stage in the evolution of some stars, caused when a red giant star looses its outer layer before the core begins to fuse helium. The sdB stars are expected to become white dwarfs without going through any more giant stages. Some of them pulsate with a period from 900 to 600 seconds (such as V361 Hydrae in the Hydra constellation), and others with a period 45 to 180 minutes. Their mass is from 2 to 6 M\(_{\odot}\). SPB stars are subject to gravity modes ("g" modes), also connected to iron opacity. SPB and \(\beta\) Cephei-type stars are interesting pulsators that might put important constraints on rotation and magnetic fields, two key actors for massive stars.
## Comparisons of Rosseland means {#ross}
The Rosseland mean opacity is the harmonic mean opacity averaged over the derivative of the Planck function with respect to the temperature: \[\frac{1}{\kappa_R}=\int_0^{\infty}\frac{W_R(u)}{\kappa'(u)}du,\] where \[u=\frac{h\nu}{k_BT}\;\;\;\; \mathrm{and}\;\;\;\; W_R(u)=\frac{15u^4e^{-u}}{4\pi^4\left[1-e^{-u}\right]^2}.\] The ATOMIC-code "full" calculations allow single-configuration fine-structure detail to be included in a relatively computationally inexpensive manner. They thus include intermediate coupling within a configuration but not complete interaction among the set of configurations. Such a simplification allows one to include the contributions from many thousands of configurations. A second set of ATOMIC semi-relativistic multi-configuration calculations was also performed using a reduced list of configurations. These calculations were designed to include the transitions in the photon range of current interest (\(h\nu\) lower than 250 eV), \(\Delta n\)=0,1, 2 and \(n_{\mathrm{max}}=5\) (\(n\) is the principal quantum number), referred to as ATOMIC n5. One observes that ATOMIC "full" and ATOMIC n5 agree within 20 % and that, in all cases, ATOMIC n5 values are smaller than those of ATOMIC "full". SCO-RCG, which is not limited to \(n\leq\) 5, is generally closer to ATOMIC "full" than to ATOMIC n5 (see Fig. [\[compa_2mg+compa_2mg_1\]](#compa_2mg+compa_2mg_1){reference-type="ref" reference="compa_2mg+compa_2mg_1"}, left and right, as well as tables [1](#atomic1){reference-type="ref" reference="atomic1"} and [2](#atomic2){reference-type="ref" reference="atomic2"}), which is consistent with the fact that configuration interaction plays a less important role than state completeness in the present case. The values of OP (Opacity Project), are usually lower. The Opacity Project, an international collaboration of about 25 scientists from 6 countries, started in response to a plea. The atomic data are available in the database TOPbase and the monochromatic opacities and Rosseland mean opacities are available at the OPServer at the Ohio Supercomputer Center.
[\[atomic1\]]{#atomic1 label="atomic1"}
[\[atomic2\]]{#atomic2 label="atomic2"}
The observed modes do not agree, as concerns their stability, with modes deduced from the OP or OPAL tables, which suggests that those opacities are underestimated. A recent study pointed out that as much as 50 % increase in astrophysical opacities was necessary to solve B star pulsation problems in the Magellanic cloud. Iglesias showed that an increase of population I stars (metallicity of 0.02) near the iron-group bump involves an order of magnitude multiplier on the nickel opacity and more than an overall doubling of the iron opacity. Although there are uncertainties in theoretical opacities (spectral-line models, configuration-interaction accounting, mixture models,\...), these errors seem unable to explain such large opacity increases. Furthermore, code comparisons do show differences in spectral details, but also suggest that current advanced implementations of photon-absorption theories are unlikely to produce large overall discrepancies in the iron-group opacities for matter conditions relevant to B stars. Moravveji produced new opacity tables with enhanced iron and nickel contributions to the Rosseland mean opacity by 75 % each, and computed, with the MESA (Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics) code, three dense grids of evolutionary models for Galactic O-and B-type stars covering from 2.5 to 25 M\(_{\odot}\) from zero-age main sequence until effective temperature \(T_{\mathrm{eff}}\)=10000 K after the core hydrogen exhaustion. The authors carried out non-adiabatic mode stability analysis and found that \(\approx\) 75 % enhancement, only in the iron opacity, is sufficient to consistently reproduce the observed position of late O-type \(\beta\) Cepheids and eight hybrid B-type pulsators on the Kiel diagram, *i.e.* \(\log T_{\mathrm{eff}}\) vs \(\log g\), where \(g\) represents the stellar surface gravity.
# The boundary of the radiative / convective zones of the Sun {#bou}
The Sun is our closest star and is thus used as a benchmark to study other stars. Its radius, luminosity and mass are known with a great accuracy. However, some doubts are raised on the relevance of the used microscopic physics. In the past decade, the photospheric abundances of the Sun have been revised several times by many observers. The standard solar models constructed with the new low-\(Z\)-metal abundances disagree with helioseismic results and detected neutrino fluxes. For instance, a discrepancy between helioseismic observations and predictions by standard solar models appeared in the solar sound speed profile (sound speed versus radius). This discrepancy, of about 20 times the vertical error bar, raises some questions on the solar radiative transfer. In addition, the Sun has an inner radiative heat conduction zone that gives way to a convective zone nearer the surface. The different contributions to the opacity of iron calculated with SCO-RCG at conditions of the boundary of the convective zone (BCZ) are displayed in Fig. [\[contrib_bcz+sco-rcg_bcz\]](#contrib_bcz+sco-rcg_bcz){reference-type="ref" reference="contrib_bcz+sco-rcg_bcz"} (left) as well as a comparison between our SCO-RCG and ATOMIC codes (right). The Rosseland means are rather close, although some differences exist around \(h\nu\)=800 eV (maximum of the derivative of Planck's distribution with respect to temperature). Solar models typically find a location of the boundary between these zones that differs significantly from the measured one (by more than 13 standard deviations ). Several hypotheses can explain this difference: \(\bullet\) macroscopic processes in the radiative zone are not taken into account in the energetic balance of the Sun. \(\bullet\) the radiative transfer calculations are not accurate, either as concerns the Rosseland mean value that could be underestimated or in the treatment of the radiative acceleration which limits the gravitational settling and could lead to incorrect internal abundances. The radiative acceleration of species \(k\) reads \[g(k)=\frac{F_R}{c}\frac{M}{M_k}\kappa_R\gamma(k),\] where \(F_R\) is the radiation flux, \(M\) the total mass of the star, \(M_k\) the mass of species \(k\) and \[\gamma(k)=\int\frac{\kappa_{\nu}(k)}{\kappa_{\nu}(\mathrm{total})}f_{\nu}d\nu,\] where \(\kappa_{\nu}(k)\) is the monochromatic opacity of species \(k\) and \(f_{\nu}\) is a function of the frequency and of the temperature. The unexplained discrepancies could also be due to all these effects simultaneously. The heavy elements significantly contribute to opacity even if they are present only at few percents in mass fraction in the solar mixture, which is mainly constituted of hydrogen and helium. The most important contributors are: \(\bullet\) iron, which contributes to the total opacity (including hydrogen and helium) at a level of 20 % in most of the radiative zone because it is always partially ionized; \(\bullet\) oxygen, which becomes partially ionized at 0.6 R\(_{\odot}\) and plays a major role at the basis of the convective zone. The increase of its opacity contribution triggers the convection; \(\bullet\) silicon, which contributes about 10 % at temperatures below 10 MK. Rotation, enhanced diffusion, convection overshoot and magnetic field contribute to explain the discrepancy. The too low helium subsurface abundance in enhanced diffusion models can be improved by the mixing caused by rotation and magnetic fields. The problem of the depth of the convective zone in rotating models can be resolved by accounting for convection overshoot. The latest phenomenon refers to convection carrying matter beyond and unstable region into a stratified, stable region. Overshoot is due to the momentum of the convective material, which carries the material beyond the unstable region. The heat of the Sun's thermonuclear fusion is carried outward by radiation in the deep interior radiation zone and by convective circulation in the outer convection zone. However, cool sinking matter from the surface penetrates farther into the radiative zone than theory would suggest. The Asplund-Grevesse-Sauval rotation model including overshooting reproduces the seismically inferred sound-speed and density profiles and the convection zone depth, but fails to reproduce the surface helium abundance and neutrino fluxes. More generally, the solar abundance controversy inspires many investigations in the microscopic physics. For instance, Mussack and Däppen examined the correction to the proton-proton reaction rate due to dynamic screening effects. Stars generate low-mass weakly interacting particles which are responsible for energy losses, such as the axions, emitted by the Primakoff effect. Axions are elementary particles postulated in 1977 to solve the strong CP problem in quantum chromodynamics. They are a possible component of cold dark matter. It was reported in 2014 that axions have been detected as a seasonal variation in observed X-ray emission that would be expected from conversion in the Earth's magnetic field of axions streaming from the Sun. In non-hadronic axion models, where axions couple to electrons, the solar axion flux is completely dominated by the ABC reactions (Atomic recombination and deexcitation, Bremsstrahlung and Compton). The ABC flux was computed from available libraries of monochromatic photon radiative opacities by exploiting the relations between axion and photon emission cross sections. These results turn to be \(\approx\) 30 % larger than previous estimates due to atomic recombination (free-bound electron transitions) and deexcitation (bound-bound), which where not taken into account. The spectra of silicon, in particular with high resolution, are helpful for deducing the abundance of silicon in stars. In the past decades, the K-shell absorption lines of silicon ions in various astrophysical objects have been extensively observed with high-resolution spectrometers of the XMM-Newton, Chandra, and Suzaku space missions. A typical example of a spectrometer is the High-energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (HETGS) on board the Chandra X-ray Observatory. With the HETGS, silicon absorption lines were observed in the spiral galaxy NGC 3783, in the black hole candidate Cygnus X-1, in the ultracompact X-ray Dipper 4U 1916-05, in the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 5548, in the bright Seyfert 1 galaxy MCG 6-30-15 and NGC 3516, in the Seyfert 1 active galactic nucleus NGC4051, *etc.*. Silicates are an important component of cosmic matter. They form in the winds of AGB (asymptotic giant branch) stars. The AGB is a region of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram populated by evolved cool luminous stars. This is a period of stellar evolution that is experienced by all low-to intermediate-mass stars (0.6-10 M\(_{\odot}\)) late in their lives. An AGB star appears, for a large part of its life, as a bright red giant with a luminosity thousands of times greater than the Sun. Silicates are processed in the diffuse interstellar medium. They are also present in dust of protoplanetary and debris disks where they help regulating thermal exchanges. In circumstellar environments, evidence for crystalline silicates is found both around AGB stars and in disks around Ae/Be stars, T Tauri stars and brown dwarfs. They are also found in cometary environments, in asteroid spectra and in interplanetary dust particles. Accurate interpretation of their absorption lines requires detailed theoretical models.
[\[radius\]]{#radius label="radius"}
Oxygen and magnesium are also important for the modelling of the Sun (their respective opacities are shown in Fig. [\[oxygen-magnesium\]](#oxygen-magnesium){reference-type="ref" reference="oxygen-magnesium"}). Reproducing the solar interior is a real challenge because one tries to reproduce the charge state distribution of the different elements together with the free-electron density \(n_e\) at the targeted conditions, that means density greater than that of a solid and high temperature (see table [3](#radius){reference-type="ref" reference="radius"}).
# Attempts to understand the enigmatic photo-absorption experiment on iron performed by Bailey *et al.* at Sandia National Laboratory {#bai}
As mentioned in Section [1](#int){reference-type="ref" reference="int"}, Bailey *et al.* published in 2007 a measurement, performed on the Z-pinch facility, of the iron transmission at conditions lower than those of the basis of the convective zone (\(T\)=156 eV and \(\rho\)=0.058 g/cm\(^3\)). This first measurement agrees well with most of the theoretical predictions. Then they have increased the temperature up to 196 eV and reached free-electron densities of several times 10\(^{21}\) cm\(^{-3}\). However, for this last measurement, an unexplained gap exists between the measurement and the theoretical calculations.
## Effect of density and temperature
Density and temperature were inferred by Nagayama *et al.*, in the experiment described in Ref., by analysis of Stark profiles of magnesium K-shell lines. As shown in Fig. [\[fig_Mg_tn\]](#fig_Mg_tn){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_Mg_tn"}, the line profiles (intensity, asymmetry, wings,\...) are very sensitive to the plasma conditions, and can therefore be used to diagnose the plasma temperature and density. In the SNL experiment, the analysis of the K-shell transmission spectra of Mg leads to \(T\)=182 eV and \(n_e\)=10\(^{22}\) cm\(^{-3}\) (which corresponds roughly to \(\rho\)=0.17 g/cm\(^3\)). Figure [\[fig1+2\]](#fig1+2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1+2"} displays the opacity computed by SCO-RCG in two different conditions: \(T\)=182 eV, \(n_e\)=3.1\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{22}\) cm\(^{-3}\) and \(T\)=195 eV, \(n_e\)=4\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{22}\) cm\(^{-3}\). The amplitude of the structures is better reproduced at \(T\)=182 eV, \(n_e\)=3.1\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{22}\) cm\(^{-3}\), but the predicted opacity level is much lower than the experimental one in both cases. However, the highest opacity values (peaks around 10.7 and 11.5 Å) at \(T\)=182 eV, \(n_e\)=3.1\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{22}\) cm\(^{-3}\) are consistent with the experimental ones. The dominant ions in the spectrum (see Fig. [\[ions\]](#ions){reference-type="ref" reference="ions"}) at \(T\)=182 eV and \(n_e\)=3.1\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{22}\) cm\(^{-3}\) are Fe XVII (24.9 %), Fe XVIII (33 %) and Fe XIX (21.7 %). The contributions to the total opacity (photo-excitation, photo-ionization, inverse Bremsstrahlung and scattering of a photon by a free electron) at \(T\)=182 eV and \(n_e\)=3.1\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{22}\) cm\(^{-3}\) are represented in Fig. [\[contributions\]](#contributions){reference-type="ref" reference="contributions"}. The most important processes are photo-excitation and photo-ionization. Figure [\[Fe_195eV+zoom\]](#Fe_195eV+zoom){reference-type="ref" reference="Fe_195eV+zoom"} shows the effect of density on the computed spectrum at \(T\)=195 eV. At the highest density (\(n_e\)=6\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{22}\) cm\(^{-3}\)), the gaps between the structures (for instance between the three F-like 2p-4d features around 11.5 Å), are less pronounced than at the lower electron density \(n_e\)=4\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{22}\) cm\(^{-3}\) and the wings of lines are broader, exhibiting shoulders. However, even at the highest density, the discrepancy between theory and experiment remains prominent.
## Effect of highly excited states
In multiply-charged ion plasmas, a significant number of electrons may occupy high-energy orbitals. These "Rydberg" electrons, when they act as spectators, are responsible for a number of satellites of X-ray absorption or emission lines, yielding an effective broadening of the resonance lines (red wings). The contribution of such satellite lines may be important, because of the high degeneracy of the relevant excited configurations which give a large Boltzmann weight. However, it is in general difficult to take those configurations into account since they are likely to give rise to a large number of lines. We proposed to model the perturbation induced by the spectators in a detailed way, inspired by the Partially Resolved Transition Array approach recently published by Iglesias, and extended to the STA theory. This approach, based on the additivity of the variances from active and spectator electrons in the STA theory, consists in a reduced detailed-line-accounting calculation, omitting these Rydberg electrons, the effect of the latests being included through an additional shift and broadening of the lines, expressed in terms of canonical partition functions, key-ingredients of the STA model. The resulting method can *a priori* be used in any detailed-configuration/line-accounting opacity code. In the case of an iron plasma at \(T\)=182 eV and \(n_e\)=10\(^{22}\) cm\(^{-3}\) (conditions of the recent experiment by Bailey *et al.* ), the statistical modelling of satellites \[Be\] \(2p^5(5s\cdots 8d)^1\rightarrow 2p^44d^1(5s\cdots 8d)^1\) fills significantly the gaps around 11.4 and 11.5 Å (see Fig. [\[figure_loisel2014_quad\]](#figure_loisel2014_quad){reference-type="ref" reference="figure_loisel2014_quad"}). The total contribution of satellites (blue curve) is very similar to the resonance transition (red curve), except that it is slightly shifted and broadened. These spectator electrons are very weakly bound to the ion, so that they do not interact much with the core electrons and perturb very weakly the transition. In our previous approach, the satellite lines due to the Rydberg electrons were treated in the STA theory, and yielded an overestimation of the opacity in the gap between the three main features of the F-like \(2p\rightarrow 4d\) lines.
## Comparison to cold opacity
Figure [\[cold_opacity\]](#cold_opacity){reference-type="ref" reference="cold_opacity"} displays a comparison betweeen the experimental spectrum and two cold opacities published by Henke *et al.* and Chantler. As was also pointed out by Iglesias, recalling that the oscillator strength density is conserved, a smoothed cross-section obtained by the following convolution is constrained to be smaller than the cold opacity: \[\kappa(\nu)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\nu'G\left(\nu-\nu'\right)\kappa\left(\nu'\right)\leq\kappa_{\mathrm{cold}},\] where \(G\) represents physical (Doppler, Stark, Van der Waals neutral-atom collisions, autoionization) and instrumental broadenings. The largest theoretical opacity is obtained from ions with a full L shell, which reproduces the cold data at small wavelength. The analysis revealed other puzzling aspects of the data: the integrated absorption suggests a full L shell, inconsistent with the measured spectrum, which displays strong spectral lines from F-and O-like configurations, and the average slope of the absorption disagrees with the one of the cold data \(\kappa_{\mathrm{cold}}\). Clearly, the Sandia data exceed \(\kappa_{\mathrm{cold}}\) at lower wavelengths.
## R-matrix photo-ionization
Recently, Nahar *et al.* reported extensive R-matrix calculations of unprecedented complexity for iron ion Fe XVII, with a wavefunction expansion of 99 Fe XVIII LS core states from \(n\leq 4\) complexes (equivalent to 218 fine-structure levels) and found a large enhancement in background photo-ionization cross-sections (up to orders of magnitude) in addition to strongly peaked photo-excitation-of-core resonances (see the black curve of Fig. [\[comp_1\]](#comp_1){reference-type="ref" reference="comp_1"}).
[\[rmatrix\]]{#rmatrix label="rmatrix"}
Figure [\[iglesias_wings\]](#iglesias_wings){reference-type="ref" reference="iglesias_wings"} displays total and photo-ionization opacities of ground \(1s^22s^22p^5\) and excited \(1s^22s^22p^53p\) configurations. As pointed out by Iglesias, it clearly illustrates the fact that the photo-ionization from \(3p\) is important and must absolutely be taken into account in the opacity. The point here is that the latest contribution is included in all opacity codes relying on a distorted-wave modelling of photo-ionization, but was not included in the previous R-matrix computations. It appears, that major opacity models already include cross-sections that are equivalent to the enhancements reported by the R-matrix method. The fact that the R-matrix calculations neglected important cross-sections (*e.g.* photo-ionization involving \(3p\) subshell, as mentioned above) explains why the resultant opacity is lower than other models in the spectral range measured in transmission experiments relevant to the solar interior (see table [4](#rmatrix){reference-type="ref" reference="rmatrix"}). The missing processes help understand the lower Fe XVII R-matrix opacity relative to other models making it discrepant with the SNL measurements. The opacities from all models are larger than R-matrix over the whole energy range of the experiment except for a few narrow features. Moreover, they all reasonably agree, except R-matrix, at higher energies corresponding to the L-shell photo-ionization continuum. The R-matrix calculations consider photo-absorption for 283 LS terms of Fe XVII corresponding to the configurations \[\begin{array}{l} 2s^22p^5n\ell\;\;\;\;\mathrm{for}\;\;\;\; n=2-10\\ 2s^22p^6n\ell\;\;\;\;\mathrm{for}\;\;\;\; n=3,4\;\;\;\;\mathrm{plus}\;\;\;\; n\ell=5s \end{array}\] excluding levels with \(J>8\). For the target ion, R-matrix calculations includes the Fe XVIII configurations \[\begin{array}{l} 2s^22p^5\\ 2s^22p^4n\ell\;\;\;\;\mathrm{for}\;\;\;\; n=3,4\\ 2s2p^6\\ 2s2p^5n\ell\;\;\;\;\mathrm{for}\;\;\;\; n=3 \;\;\;\;\mathrm{plus}\;\;\;\; n\ell=4s,4p\\ \end{array}\] which generate 99 LS-terms. It follows that Nahar and Pradhan omitted the photo-ionizations \[\begin{array}{ll} 2s^22p^5n\ell+h\nu\rightarrow 2s^22p^5n\ell\epsilon p, & n\ell=4p,4f \;\;\;\;\mathrm{and}\;\;\;\; n\ge 5\\ 2s2p^6n\ell+h\nu\rightarrow 2p^6n\ell\epsilon p, & \mathrm{all}\;\;\;\; n\\ 2s^22p^5n\ell+h\nu\rightarrow 2s2p^5n\ell\epsilon\ell', & n\ge 5\\ 2s2p^6n\ell+h\nu\rightarrow 2s2p^5n\ell\epsilon\ell', & n\ell=4p,4f \;\;\;\;\mathrm{and}\;\;\;\; n\ge 5. \end{array}\] with \(\ell'=s,d\). Opacity models like ours (relying on distorted-wave approximation) treat the absorption processes described by Nahar and Pradhan as inner-shell bound-bound transitions into discrete autoionizing levels or as bound-free transitions. It is emphasized that all approaches satisfying the \(f\)-sum rule yield the same total absorption strength but only if they use the same set of initial and final configurations. The Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule reads: \[\sum_{i,j}f_{ij}+\sum_i\int_{I_i}^ {\infty}\frac{df_{i,\epsilon}}{d\epsilon}d\epsilon=Z-Z^*,\] where \(I_i\) is the ionization potential of subshell \(i\) and \(Z^*\) the average ionization (\(Z-Z^*\) representing therefore the total number of bound electrons). Differences in the opacity can still occur due to several aspects of atomic-structure calculations, such as level populations, and/or details in broadening of spectral lines or photo-ionization resonances. Nahar and Pradhan's R-matrix calculations, however, did not include all target ion states consistent with their initial configurations and thus neglected important cross-sections. The R-matrix calculations also limited the initial configuration list compared with current opacity models. Some of the missing transitions impact the L-shell photo-ionization continuum and help explain the lower opacity from R-matrix relative to other models in the spectral range of the SNL experiments. Effects from other missing atomic data involve numerous weak features in spectral regions of low photo-absorption, such as PEC (photo-excitation-of-core) resonances. Proponents of close-coupling methods argue that such calculations are in principle better than other schemes (e.g.; distorted wave), but that may not be true in the plasma environment. In plasmas, fluctuating electric fields and collisions between ions and electrons may significantly impact, and even destroy, the coherence required for the interference effects included in close-coupling methods. It remains an open question if the improvements in cross-sections reported using R-matrix methods for isolated atoms are really relevant for the modelling of atomic processes in plasmas.
## Autoionization
The process of autoionization, described in Sec. [1.1](#rad){reference-type="ref" reference="rad"}, is likely to provide an additional broadening to spectral lines. The autoionization rate \[A_{if}^a=\sum_j\left|\langle\psi_f,j;J_T,M_T\left|\sum_{i<j}\frac{1}{r_{ij}}\right|\psi_i\rangle\right|^2,\] where \(J_T\) and \(M_T\) are the total angular momentum and its projection, \(j\) the quantum number of the free electron, \(\psi_i\) and \(\psi_f\) being the wavefunctions of the initial and final configurations respectively. The autoionization rate can be calculated as a configuration average. We developed such an approach in the Multi-Configuration Dirac-Fock (MCDF) code developed by Bruneau, and our results are very close to the ones obtained with the Flexible Atomic Code (FAC). High populations in metastable states can also contribute to a process called ladder ionization, which becomes important when the electron temperature is too small to support significant collisional ionization from the ground state but large enough to support ionization from excited states that lie much closer to the continuum limit. The collisional ionization flux and charge state distribution therefore depend on the degree of state detail. In addition, some mid-shell ions support excitation-ionization processes for states formed by single excitation from inner subshells, such as the \(1s^ 22s^22p^ 6n\ell\) states in F-like iron, which are autoionizing for \(n\ge 6\). The values of the autoionization rates for Fe XVII \(1s^ 22s^12p^6nd\) \(\rightarrow\) Fe XVIII \(1s^22s^22p^5\epsilon\ell\) and Fe XVIII \(1s^22s^12p^5nd\) \(\rightarrow\) Fe XIX \(1s^22s^22p^4\epsilon\ell\), for \(n\)=1 to 20, are plotted in figure [\[auger_hansen\]](#auger_hansen){reference-type="ref" reference="auger_hansen"}. The rates can reach several 10\(^ {13}\) s\(^ {-1}\), which is at maximum of the order of one tenth of collisional widths. This is not negligible, but clearly not sufficient to broaden significantly the main absorption features. Figure [\[figure_1s22s12p66d_bis_2\]](#figure_1s22s12p66d_bis_2){reference-type="ref" reference="figure_1s22s12p66d_bis_2"} represents transition \(1s^22s^12p^66d-1s^22s^12p^54d6d\) with and without broadening due to autoionization process \(1s^22s^12p^66d-1s^22s^22p^5\epsilon\ell\) computed using FAC code. The gap is slightly filled, but the initial configuration is a rather highly excited one, and its probability, and therefore its contribution to the spectrum, are not dominant. We checked that the effect of ionization/recombination is much smaller on the resonance transition \(1s^22s^22p^6\rightarrow 1s^22s^22p^54d^1\). We can see in Fig. [\[ato\]](#ato){reference-type="ref" reference="ato"} that the dispersion of autoionization rates between relativistic subconfigurations is likely to be rather important (see table [5](#tab_auto){reference-type="ref" reference="tab_auto"}).
[\[tab_auto\]]{#tab_auto label="tab_auto"}
## Breit interaction and QED corrections
The Breit operator includes Coulomb repulsion, magnetic interaction and retardation in the electron-electron interaction due to finite value of the speed of light. The Breit Hamiltonian reads \[h_B=\frac{1}{r_{12}}-\frac{\vec{\alpha}_1.\vec{\alpha}_2}{r_{12}}\cos\left(\omega_{12}r_{12}\right)+\left(\vec{\alpha}.\vec{\nabla}\right)_1\left(\vec{\alpha}.\vec{\nabla}\right)_2\frac{\cos\left(\omega_{12}r_{12}\right)-1}{\omega_{12}^2r_{12}},\] where \(\alpha_i\) are the 4\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}4 Dirac matrices, \(\omega_{12}\) is the frequency of the exchange photon and the electron-electron interaction is expressed in the Coulomb (velocity) gauge. In the present work, we consider two quantum electrodynamics (QED) corrections, responsible for the Lamb shift: vacuum polarization and self-energy (the corresponding Feynman diagrams are presented in Fig. [\[fd\]](#fd){reference-type="ref" reference="fd"}). Vacuum polarization is due to creation and annihilation of virtual electron-positron pairs in the field of the nucleus. The first term of order \(\alpha(\alpha Z)\) is evaluated as the expectation value of the Uehling's potential. The self-energy (SE) represents the interaction of the electron with its own radiation field. In quantum field theory, this interaction corresponds to an electron emitting a virtual photon, which is then reabsorbed by the electron. In the early 1970s, Mohr proposed an atomic self-energy formulation for hydrogenic atoms within the bound-state Furry formalism in a suitable form for numerical evaluation: \[\label{foncf} E_{n\ell j}^{\mathrm{SE}}\left(\alpha Z\right)=\frac{\left(\alpha Z\right)^4}{\pi n^3\alpha}F_{n\ell j}\left(\alpha Z\right),\] where \(F\) is a slowly varying function of \(\alpha Z\). For \(s\) and \(p\) orbitals, \(F\) is evaluated using a development in powers of \((Z\alpha)\) and \(\ln(Z\alpha)\) for \(Z\leq 10\) and an interpolation in the tabulated values of Mohr for \(Z>10\). For \(n\)=3 and 4 we take the fit published by Curtis and the results of Le Bigot *et al.*. Calculation of many-electron radiative corrections is still one of the most difficult problems to deal with for high-precision level prediction. There have been no generalization of the self-energy calculations to arbitrary \(N-\)electron systems. Without exact solutions, atomic-structure codes use an approximation to the self-energy that consists of evaluating the exact hydrogenic formulas of Mohr and successors for an effective charge \(Z_{\mathrm{eff}}\) in order to account for screening and multiple-electron interactions. The screening contribution to the self-energy is defined as \[E_{n\ell j}^{\mathrm{SE}}\left(\alpha Z_{\mathrm{eff}}\right)-E_{n\ell j}^{\mathrm{SE}}\left(\alpha Z\right)=\frac{\alpha^3}{\pi n^3}\left(Z_{\mathrm{eff}}^4F_{n\ell j}\left(\alpha Z_{\mathrm{eff}}\right)-Z^4F_{n\ell j}\left(\alpha Z\right)\right),\] where \(Z_{\mathrm{eff}}\) takes into account screening by the other electrons. Such an approach is not as accurate as Welton's approach, but provides satisfactory results, when the effective charges are deduced from the average radius of the \(n\ell j\) orbital. We can see in Fig. [\[mcdf_Fe_Breit_APS2016\]](#mcdf_Fe_Breit_APS2016){reference-type="ref" reference="mcdf_Fe_Breit_APS2016"} that the shift due to Breit and QED correction is of the order of 2 eV. Because of the width of the experimental structures, it seems difficult to assert that such a shift brings a significant improvement of the computed line energies.
# Diagnostic utility of the 3C/3D line ratio in Fe XVII: another issue about iron\... {#3c3}
Fe XVII X-ray emission is present in the coronae of the Sun, Capella (\(\alpha\) Aurigae, located at 42.2 light-years from the Earth in the Auriga (or Cocher) constellation, third brightest star in the north hemisphere after Sirius and Arcturus) and Procyon. The latest, also known as \(\alpha\) Canis Minoris, is the brightest star in the constellation of Canis Minor. It is a binary star, consisting of a white main-sequence star of spectral type F5 and a white dwarf companion named Procyon B, or NGC 4635. Two of the most distinct lines observed from Fe XVII are the resonance 3C \(1s^22s^22p^53d\) \(^1P_1\) \(\rightarrow\) \(1s^22s^22p^6\) \(^1S_0\) and intercombination 3D \(1s^22s^22p^53d\) \(^3D_1\) \(\rightarrow\) \(1s^22s^22p^6\) \(^1S_0\) lines. Values of the relative intensity \(r\) of these two lines between 1.6 and 2.8 have been measured in non-flaring active regions of the solar corona. Values in the range 2.6 to 2.8 have been measured from Capella and a value of 1.8 has been reported for Procyon. However, there is a large discrepancy between observations and theory. Table [6](#3c3d){reference-type="ref" reference="3c3d"} contains the values of the oscillator strengths of 3C and 3D lines calculated with our MCDF code in the "transition state" approximation within two different gauges: Coulomb (velocity) and Babushkin (length). The self-consistent-field MCDF equations are obtained by requiring that a particular functional is stationary with respect to radial wavefunctions. Such a functional involves elements of the Hamiltonian matrix weighted by coefficients, usually referred to as "generalized weights". In the "Average Level" (AL) mode, the generalized weights are chosen to be the same for all the Atomic State Functions (ASF). Therefore, resolution of the self-consistent-field equations and diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix can be performed separately. However, if the initial state of a transition has a much larger degeneracy than the final state, the wavefunctions will describe preferentially the initial state (and *vice versa*). In that case, orbital relaxation is not taken into account and transition energies may be inaccurate. The AL method can be improved using the Slater transition-state method, to equilibrate the weights between the initial and final configurations. In order to understand the discrepancy between experimental and theoretical values of \(r\), a number of effects have been investigated, such as blending with an inner shell satellite line from Fe XVI, cascades from higher levels, non-Maxwellian electron distributions or configuration interaction. The discrepancies between theory and these measurements prompted Bernitt *et al.* to combine X-ray Free-Electron Laser (XFEL) at the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) facility with an EBIT (Electron Beam Ion Trap). Well-defined X-ray pulses scanned the excitation energies of the associated states while simultaneously measuring the emission spectrum. The aim was to understand the discrepancies with the ratio measured in previous EBIT experiments. The LCLS experiment and the previous EBIT measurements are quite different in nature. The EBIT plasmas were electron-impact dominated, with many levels being simultaneously excited. The LCLS measurements were laser-driven and tuned to excite one transition at a time, producing a two-level system. The fluorescence intensity ratio of 3D and 3C was measured at \(r\)=2.61 \(\pm\) 0.23, averaged over two independent measurement periods, after accounting for the blending of 3D with the Fe XVI line 3C. Loch *et al.* performed a non-equilibrium modelling of the XFEL experiment and obtained a reduction of the predicted 3C/3D line ratio, but the discrepancy is still not fully understood.
[\[3c3d\]]{#3c3d label="3c3d"}
More generally, the emission arising from He-like iron lines and their dielectronic satellites, has been observed at low resolution in a number of clusters of galaxies. More precisely, using Gabriel's notation, the ratio \(G=(x+y+z)/w\) of the intercombination (\(x\) and \(y\)) and forbidden (\(z\)) to the resonance (\(w\)) lines arising from the \(n\)=2 level of the He-like ion, is a sensitive temperature diagnostics.
# Stark effect, white dwarfs and Balmer lines {#whi}
The diagnostic value of Stark-broadened lines such as H\(_{\beta}\) (\(n\)=2 to \(n\)=4) has long been investigated by the experimentalists. It is well known that these lines play also a significant role in inferring the plasma conditions at the photospheres of high-gravity astronomical objects. Particularly for the white dwarfs (WD), those gravities are \(\approx\) 10\(^4\) times higher than that of the Sun and their correspondingly higher electron densities (\(n_e\approx\) 10\(^{16}\)-10\(^{18}\) cm\(^{-3}\)) lead to significant Stark broadening of the lines. Exploiting this sensitivity, astronomers use the measured widths of these lines to infer the surface gravities of these WD and thereby determine their masses. Figure [\[AquariiSirius\]](#AquariiSirius){reference-type="ref" reference="AquariiSirius"} (left) represents an artist view of the cataclysmic variable binary star AE Aquarii, consisting of an ordinary star in close orbit around a magnetic white dwarf. The white dwarf has 63 % of the Sun mass, but a radius of only about 1 % of the Sun. The white dwarf in the AE Aquarii system is the first star of its type known to give off pulsar-like pulsations that are powered by its rotation and particle acceleration. It has the shortest known spin period of any white dwarf, completing a full revolution every 33.08 seconds. Figure [\[AquariiSirius\]](#AquariiSirius){reference-type="ref" reference="AquariiSirius"} (right) represents Sirius A and its white dwarf companion star Sirius B. The distance between Sirius A and Sirius B varies from 8.2 to 31.5 AU (1 AU=1.49597870\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{8}\) km). Sirius, also know as the "Dog star", reflecting its prominence in its constellation, Canis Major, is the brightest star in the Earth's night sky. The spectroscopic method is the most widely-used technique and is responsible for determining parameters for tens of thousands of WD. Obtaining high-accuracy estimates of those parameters is crucial for the use of WD, in order to determine the age of the universe, constrain the mass of supernovae progenitors and probe properties of dark matter axions. Wiese *et al.* measured the Balmer lines H\(_{\alpha}\), H\(_{\beta}\), H\(_{\gamma}\) and H\(_{\delta}\) in high-current, wall-stabilized arcs in hydrogen. In 2009, Tremblay and Bergeron developed a new treatment of line broadening including non ideal effects, using the Hummer-Mihalas equation of state. They found a revision of 500-1000 K in temperature and 5-10 % mass for the population of WD. More recently Falcon *et al.* developed a platform on the Z machine at SNL to measure H\(_{\beta}\) line shapes in photospheric conditions (\(T\approx\) 1 eV, \(n_e\approx\) 10\(^{17}\) cm\(^{-3}\)), using the powerful X-ray capability of the machine to drive plasma formation in a gas cell. They measured hydrogen Balmer lines in emission and, for the first time, in absorption. Up to now, SCO-RCG provided a precise Stark modeling only for hydrogen-and helium-like ions. As an example, the hydrogen \(H_{\beta}\) profile computed by SCO-RCG at the conditions of Wiese *et al.* is shown in Fig. [\[white_dwarf+hbeta\]](#white_dwarf+hbeta){reference-type="ref" reference="white_dwarf+hbeta"}, right. For more complex ions, a cruder approach is used. It is worth mentioning that the existence of white dwarfs with a carbon and oxygen atmospheres was reported. We can expect that several charge states are present (not only hydrogen-like oxygen). Therefore, it is important, in that case, to be able to compute accurate Stark profiles for ions with more than two electrons.
# Conclusion
The detailed opacity code SCO-RCG has a great potential for astrophysical applications. It is also able to provide accurate Rosseland mean opacities and we have shown the interpretation of several laser and Z-pinch spectroscopy experiments. Large changes in stellar opacities may make it necessary to consider new or overlooked physical phenomena absent in present opacity models. This stresses the importance of laboratory experiments to guide and validate theory. Recent measurements of the iron photo-absorption relevant to the solar interior show significant discrepancies with theoretical results. The data, in the absence of unidentified systematic experimental errors, reveal surprising unobserved photo-absorption phenomena in plasmas. A conjecture to reconcile the discrepancies is that some transitions are missing in the calculations. Another possibility is a redistribution of oscillator strengths not included in the models. A full configuration-interaction treatment, not performed in SCO-RCG calculations, may transfer oscillator strength to higher energies. As mentioned by Iglesias the observed enhanced absorption seems incompatible with theory since calculations satisfy the Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule and preserve oscillator strength density and particle number. In this work, the disagreement between experiment and theory was examined, and although none of our investigations provide an explanation (density effects, highly excited states, line broadening,\...), this enigmatic spectrum remains definitely an exciting mystery and stimulates many new developments in opacity modelling and computation. **Acknowledgments** The authors would like to thank all the authors of Refs. for the experimental spectra as well as J. Colgan for providing the ATOMIC spectra. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:06:43', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01761', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01761'} |
# Introduction
In the last few years, spintronics has emerged as a new field of research, utilizing spin currents, instead of electrons, as one of mediator for transport. It has proved to be quite promising for new types of fast electronic devices over conventional electrical charge-based semiconductor devices with advantages of high storage density, increased data processing speed and low power consumption. To enhance the efficiency of spintronic devices, the carrier for the concerned materials should be fully spin polarized. Half-metallic ferromagnets (HMFs) are great source for highly spin polarized current and thus are ideal materials for spintronic based applications. Half-metallicity is found in magnetic materials in which one of the spin-polarized sub band has a band gap and the other exchange-split sub band has a non zero density of states at the Fermi level(E\(_{F}\)), thus in these materials the electrical conduction takes place from one spin channel exclusively. The discovery of half-metallicity in half-Heusler alloy NiMnSb, by de Groot et al. in 1983 has intensified the interest in Heusler alloys for applications in the field of spintronics. Heusler family of compounds are usually of two types (i) a ternary material with stoichiometry 1:1:1 known as half-Heusler compounds (XYZ) (ii) also a ternary materials but with stoichiometry 2:1:1 known as full-Heusler compounds (\(\mathrm{X_2YZ}\)). There is another class of Heusler compounds which are discovered recently with stoichiometry 1:1:1:1, and are known as equiatomic quaternary Heusler alloys (XX'YZ), where X, X' and Y are transition metals and Z is a main group element. The half-Heusler alloys crystallize in \(C1_b\) structure (space group \#216, \(F\bar{4}3m\)) with prototype MgAgAs and the full Heusler alloys crystallize in the cubic space group \(Fm\bar{3}m\) (\#225), with \(\mathrm{Cu_2 MnAl}\) (\(L2_1\)) as prototype, whereas the "quaternary" Heusler alloys crystallize in cubic space group (\#216) with LiMgPdSn as prototype (Y-type). Among the full Heusler compounds, considerable attention has been paid to the Co based compounds because of their high spin polarization and high Curie temperature, which make them more suitable for applications in spintronics. According to Jullière model,[@JULLIERE1975225] the high spin polarization is very advantageous for getting high tunneling magneto-resistance ratios in magnetic tunnel junctions. The quaternary Heusler alloys CoRhMnZ (Z = Ga, Sn and Sb) have been studied in detail by both theoretical and experimental methods and were found to be HMF by ab-initio calculations. CoRhMnGe, however, has not been studied from experimental front. Hence keeping in view the increased interest and applications of Co-based Heusler alloys, we present a comprehensive study of electronic, structural, magnetic and transport properties of CoRhMnGe (CRMG) Heusler alloy. CRMG alloy is found to exist in the ordered cubic Heusler structure (Y-type) with space group \(F\bar{4}3m\) (\#216). We have done a detailed local structure analysis using extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy. The saturation magnetization value \(M_s\) at 5 K is found to be 4.9 \(\mu_{B}/f.u.\) which is in close agreement with the value predicted by Slater-Pauling rule (5 \(\mu_{B}/f.u.\)) for half-metallic materials. The Curie temperature (\(\mathrm{T_{C}}\)) was found to be \(\sim 760\) K which is highest among the reported CoRhMnZ (Z = Ga, Sn, Sb) alloy.[@0953] We have also performed a systematic ab-initio calculations to study the electronic structure, magnetism, mechanical and transport properties of the alloy. Ab-initio simulations also predict half-metallic nature for this alloy. Total energy and lattice dynamics calculations suggest that the alloy is chemically and mechanically stable against external pressure. Effect of pressure on magnetism and half metallicity is studied at length.
# Experimental Details
## Sample Synthesis
The polycrystalline alloy CRMG was prepared by arc melting the stoichiometric amounts of constituent elements (at least 99.9% purity) in water cooled copper hearth under high purity argon atmosphere. To further reduce the contamination a Ti ingot was used as an oxygen getter. 2% extra Mn was taken to compensate the weight loss due to Mn evaporation during melting. The ingot formed was flipped and melted several times for better homogeneity, The final weight loss was less than 1%.
## Characterization
X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was taken at room temperature using X"pert pro diffractometer with \(\mathrm{Cu-K\alpha}\) radiation to study the crystal structure of the sample. XRD analysis was done with the help of FullProf suite which uses the least square refinement between the experimental and calculated intensities. Rietveld method is used to optimize the \(\chi\)-square function given by: \[\chi^2= w_i\Sigma_i{(y_{iobs}-y_{ical})^2}\] where \(w_i\) is the inverse of the variance associated with the \(i^{th}\) observation i.e \(\sigma^2(y_{iobs})\) and \(y_{iobs}\) and \(y_{ical}\) are the observed and calculated scattering intensities for a diffraction angle \(2\theta_i\). It also contains GFourier program, which is used to calculate and visualize the electron density within the unit cell. EXAFS (Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure) measurements on CRMG were done to probe the local structure surrounding the Co, Ge and Mn sites. The X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurements have been carried out at the Energy-Scanning EXAFS beam-line (BL-9) in transmission mode at the INDUS-2 Synchrotron Source (2.5 GeV, 200 mA) at Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology (RRCAT), Indore, India. This beam-line operates in the energy range of 4-25 keV. The beam-line optics consists of a Rh/Pt coated collimating meridional cylindrical mirror and the collimated beam reflected by the mirror is monochromatized by a Si(111) (2d=6.2709 Å) based double crystal monochromator (DCM). The second crystal of the DCM is a sagittal cylinder used for horizontal focusing while a Rh/Pt coated bendable post mirror facing down is used for vertical focusing of the beam at the sample position. Three ionization chambers (300 mm length each) were used for data collection in the transmission mode; one for measuring incident flux (\(I_0\)), one for measuring transmitted flux (\(I_T\)) and the third for measuring EXAFS spectrum of a reference metal foil for energy calibration. Appropriate gas pressure and gas mixture have been chosen to achieve 10-20% absorption in first ionization chamber and 70-90% absorption in second one to improve the signal to noise ratio. Rejection of the higher harmonics content in the X-ray beam was performed by the second mirror. The absorption coefficient, \(\mu\) was obtained using the relation: \[I_T = I_0 e^{-\mu x}\] where, \(x\) is the thickness of the absorber. Powder samples of appropriate weight, estimated to obtain a reasonable edge jump, were taken and was mixed thoroughly with cellulose powder to obtain total weight of 100 mg. Subsequently, homogeneous pellets of \(15\) mm diameter were prepared using an electrically operated hydraulic press. However, the grain size of the particles was of the order of 50 micron, which resulted in very bad data. The sample was later grounded continuously using a mortar-pestle for 3 hours to reduce the particle size to less than 4 microns. This fine powder was dispersed on the scotch tape and larger particles are brushed out. A reasonable edge jump was obtained by folding the scotch tape. Magnetization isotherms at 5 K and 300 K were obtained using a vibrating sample magneto meter (VSM) attached to the physical property measurement system (PPMS) (Quantum design) for fields up to 50 kOe. Thermo-magnetic curves in the high temperature region (300 K-1000 K) were taken in VSM with attached high temperature oven under a field of 100 Oe. Electrical resistivity measurements were done using four-probe method in PPMS.
# Computational Details
Ab-initio calculations were performed to study the electronic structure, magnetic and mechanical properties using density functional theory (DFT) implemented within Vienna ab-initio simulation package (VASP) with a projected augmented wave (PAW) basis. The electronic exchange-correlation potential due to Perdew-Bueke-Ernzerhof (PBE) is used within generalized gradient approximation (GGA) scheme. A \(24^3\) **k**-mesh is used to perform the Brillouin zone integration within the tetrahedron method. A plane wave energy cut-off of \(269\) eV is used for all the calculations. ALL the structure are fully relaxed, with total energies (forces) converged to values less than 10\(^{-6}\) eV (\(0.01\) eV/Å). Transport properties are calculated using Boltzmann transport theory implemented within the BoltzTrap code under constant relaxation time approximation of the charge carriers. These calculations are performed using experimental lattice parameter to make a direct comparison with the measured resistivity. Simulating accurate transport properties usually require a much finer k-mesh as well as plane-wave energy cut-off. As such \(46^3\) k-mesh along with a plane wave cut-off of 500 eV are used for transport study. Because, simulated electrical conductivity within BoltzTrap are more reliable at relatively higher temperature (\(> 100\) K), we compared our calculated results with those of experiment between the range \(100-400\) K.
# Results and Discussion
## Structural stability {#struc-stability}
Quaternary Heusler alloys exhibit LiMgPdSn-type crystal structure (\# \(216\)) whose primitive cell contains four atoms at the Wyckoff positions, 4a(0, 0, 0), 4b(1/2, 1/2, 1/2), 4c(1/4, 1/4, 1/4) and 4d(3/4, 3/4, 3/4). The preferred occupation depends upon the electronegativities and sizes of individual atoms. Hence, we have calculated the total energies corresponding to different atomic configurations. We have found three non-degenerate atomic configurations, obtained by interchanging constituent atoms at various Wyckoff positions such as Type1, Type2 and Type3 with decreasing stability. The energetics and corresponding configurations are shown in Fig. [\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"}. The most stable configuration (Type1) corresponds to the occupation: Co at 4d, Rh at 4c, Mn at 4b and Ge at 4a Wyckoff sites. On the other hand in Type2 configuration, Co sits at 4b, Rh at 4d, Mn at 4c and Ge at 4a sites. The least stable structure, Type 3, is formed when Co occupies at 4d, Rh at 4b, Mn at 4c and Ge at 4a Wyckoff sites respectively.
## Electronic structure, magnetic and mechanical properties
In this section, spin polarized electronic structure, magnetic properties and the mechanical stability of CRMG alloy are presented using *ab-initio* simulations. Figure [\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"} shows spin polarized band structure and density of states calculated at theoretically relaxed lattice parameter (a\(_{rlp} = 5.92 \mathrm{\AA}\)). CRMG clearly shows an indirect band gap of \(0.23\) eV from \(\Gamma \rightarrow X\) in the minority spin channel and finite DoS at E\(_{F}\) in the majority spin channel leading to the ideal 100\(\%\) spin polarized current in the system. Experimental lattice parameter (a\(_{elp}\)) is measured to be 5.89 \(\mathrm{\AA}\) which is not very different from that of a\(_{rlp}\). Calculated band structure at a\(_{elp}\) looks very similar to that of Fig. [\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"} with a band gap of \(0.23\) eV. The calculated total magnetic moment (m\(_{tot}\)) is \(4.94\ \mu_{B}/f.u.\) at a\(_{rlp}\), which follows Slater-Pauling rule, [@PhysRevB.83.184428; @PhysRevB.66.174429; @Slat1; @Paul1] according to which, \(m = (N_v-24) \mu_B\), where \(N_v\) is the number of valence electrons per unit cell. Our experimentally measured total moment is \(4.9\ \mu_{B}/f.u.\). We have also calculated the Curie temperature (T\(_C\)) using the model presented in Refs. . The calculated T\(_C\) comes out to be \(915\) K (\(917\) K) with a\(_{elp}\) (a\(_{rlp}\)), which compares fairly well with those measured by us (\(\sim\) \(760\) K). We have also checked the mechanical stability of the alloy by performing lattice dynamics calculations. The linear response parameter e.g. elastic constants (C\(_{ij}\)) are nothing but the proportionality factor of stress and strain of the crystal under applied force. Calculated values of \(C_{ij}\) for CRMG at equilibrium lattice constant (a\(_{rlp}\)) are C\(_{11} = 259.83\), C\(_{12} = 167.41\), C\(_{44} = 98.00\) N/m\(^2\). The condition for mechanical stability of cubic crystals, the so called Born-Huang criteria, is defined as, \[C_{11} > 0, \; C_{44} > 0, \; C_{11} > C_{12}, \; (C_{11}+2C_{12}) > 0,\] These criteria very well hold in the present case and hence CRMG is mechanically stable. The other elastic moduli such as Bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Young's modulus (Y) and the anisotropy factor (A) are also calculated and are given by \(198.22\), \(72.83\), \(194.65\) and \(2.12\) respectively.
In the Fourier transformed EXAFS spectrum of Co K-edge (Fig. [\[fig:EXAFS3\]](#fig:EXAFS3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:EXAFS3"}(a)), the main peak near 2.1 \(\mathrm{\AA}\) has contribution from Co-Ge (2.40 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)), Co-Rh (2.40 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)) and Co-Mn (2.92 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)) paths. The small peak around 3.5 \(\mathrm{\AA}\) at Co K-edge spectrum is the contribution of Co-Co (4.05 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)) coordination and a small contribution of higher bond length paths. The third peak at 4.25 \(\mathrm{\AA}\) is the contribution from Co-Ge (4.60 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)) and Co-Rh (4.60 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)) coordination shells with multiple scattering paths. The use of multiple scattering paths does not include any further independent parameters as all the multiple scattering parameters are defined in terms of single scattering path parameters. In case of Ge K-edge (Fig. [\[fig:EXAFS3\]](#fig:EXAFS3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:EXAFS3"}c), the first peak has the contribution from Ge-Co (2.39 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)), Ge-Mn (2.39 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)) and Ge-Rh (2.92 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)) paths. The peak at 3 \(\mathrm{\AA}\) could not be fitted well as there is no coordination shell present at this distance. The peak at 3.6 \(\mathrm{\AA}\) is the contribution from Ge-Ge (4.11 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)) path. The double peak between 4 \(\mathrm{\AA}\) and 5 \(\mathrm{\AA}\) is fitted with Ge-Co (4.89 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)), Ge-Mn (4.89 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)) and multiple scattering paths. Similarly, in case of Mn K-edge (Fig. [\[fig:EXAFS3\]](#fig:EXAFS3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:EXAFS3"}(b)) the first peak has the contribution from Mn-Ge (2.40 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)), Mn-Rh (2.40 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)) and Mn-Co (2.89 \(\mathrm{\AA}\)). The region between 3.5 \(\mathrm{\AA}\) and 4.5 \(\mathrm{\AA}\) is fitted with Mn-Mn, Mn-Ge and Mn-Rh coordination shells with multiple scattering paths.
## Magnetic Properties
Figure [\[fig:CRMG_MH\]](#fig:CRMG_MH){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CRMG_MH"} shows the isothermal magnetization curves for the CRMG alloy at 5 K and 300 K. The absence of hysteresis shows the soft magnetic nature of the alloy. The saturation magnetization values (\(M_s\)) at 5 K and 300 K were found to be 4.9 \(\mu_B/f.u.\) and 4.7 \(\mu_B/f.u.\) respectively. The obtained \(M_s\) value (at 5 K) is in close agreement with those expected from Slater-Pauling rule (5 \(\mu_B/f.u.\) ) which gives a strong indication of the half-metallic nature of this alloy. Figure [\[fig:CRMGMT\]](#fig:CRMGMT){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:CRMGMT"} shows the temperature dependence of the magnetization at a constant field of 100 Oe. The Curie temperature (\(T_c\)) is found to be \(\sim760\) K.
## Transport properties
Figure [\[fig:Res-fits-final\]](#fig:Res-fits-final){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Res-fits-final"}(A) shows the measured temperature dependence of resistivity for CRMG at \(0\) kOe. The inset (b) of Fig. [\[fig:Res-fits-final\]](#fig:Res-fits-final){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Res-fits-final"}(A) presents the \(\rho\) versus T at two different fields \(0\) kOe and \(50\) kOe, indicating insignificant dependence of \(\rho\) on the field. To closely investigate the half-metallic nature of CRMG, we have used two different functions for fitting the zero field resistivity curve. The residual resistivity is found to be \(48.16\) \(\mu\Omega\) cm. In the first approach, we have fitted the resistivity data to a general power law, \[\rho(T) = \rho_0 + \rho_n T^n\] where \(\rho_0\) is the residual resistivity. The value of n, when fitted in temperature range 2-400 K is found to be 1.53. In the second approach, the resistivity curve was fitted using the equation \[\rho(T) = \rho_0+ \rho_{phonon} + \rho_{magnon} = \rho_0+ \rho_1 T + \rho_2 T^2\] where \(\rho_1\) and \(\rho_2\) are arbitrary constants, \(\rho_0\) is the residual resistivity which originates from the scattering of conduction electrons by the lattice defects, impurities etc., \(\rho_{phonon}\) and \(\rho_{magnon}\) arise due to scattering of phonons and magnons respectively. With the quadratic temperature dependence, the curve fits well for temperature \(\mathrm{T} > 35\) K as shown in the inset (a) of Fig. [\[fig:Res-fits-final\]](#fig:Res-fits-final){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Res-fits-final"}(A). At low temperatures, however, the electrical resistivity is found to be almost independent of temperature (2-35 K). Similar behavior was also observed for other half-metallic ferromagnets like CoRuFeSi and \(\mathrm{Co_2FeSi}\). The results of the fitting are given in Table [\[tab5\]](#tab5){reference-type="ref" reference="tab5"}. It can be seen that the dominant contribution is from the electron-phonon scattering (T-dependence). In a half-metallic ferromagnet, the states at E\(_{F}\) are completely spin-polarized, and hence spin-flip scattering is not possible due to absence of electrons in the minority band gap at E\(_{F}\). Thus, for a half-metallic ferromagnet, \(T^2\) term is expected to be absent in the resistivity. The insignificant contribution of \(T^2\) term in the resistivity data for CRMG alloy, indirectly supports the half-metallic nature. Figure [\[fig:Res-fits-final\]](#fig:Res-fits-final){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Res-fits-final"}(B)(top) shows a comparison of our theoretically simulated resistivity (solid circle) with those measured (red line). Within Boltztrap method, the resistivity (or the electrical conductivity) is calculated in units of the relaxation time (\(\tau\)). The bottom panel of Fig. [\[fig:Res-fits-final\]](#fig:Res-fits-final){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Res-fits-final"}(B) shows the temperature dependence of these relaxation time, which varies in the range \(1-2\) femtoseconds and hence lie in the typical range of \(\tau\) as for most other standard compounds. The comparison of resistivity (\(\rho\)) is shown only between \(100-400\) K, because Boltztrap method is based on a semiclassical theory and it relatively yields more accurate results at higher temperatures. This is mainly because for low temperatures, fewer bands are included in the summation for resistivity expression, and thus a much higher k-point mesh is necessary to obtain accurate estimations of the electrical properties.
# Summary and Conclusion
In summary, we have studied the structural, electronic, magnetic and transport properties of equiatomic quaternary Heusler alloy, CoRhMnGe by means of both theory and experiment. Experimentally prepared alloy crystallizes in Y-type structure with almost no signature of intrinsic disorder. Ab-initio simulation confirms the stability of the measured crystal structure. It also confirms the half-metallic nature of the alloy (leading to high spin polarization) which is supported by the experimentally observed (almost) integer moment (\(\sim\) 5.0 \(\mu_B\)) at 5K. In addition, measured electrical resistivity also indirectly supports the half-metallic behavior in the alloy. Electrical resistivity is also calculated theoretically, which compares fairly well with experiment. Carrier relaxation time (\(\tau\)) is shown to lie between \(1-2\) fs, which is the usual range of \(\tau\) in most compounds. Pressure studies reveal that half metallic nature of CRMG remains robust within a limited range of pressure (upto 30.27 GPa) beyond which it becomes metallic. There is, however, no evidence of magnetic phase transition. Electronic energy and lattice dynamics calculations show that the system is chemically as well as mechanically stable. Summarizing all these properties along with high spin polarization and relatively large value of T\(_{C}\) (\(\sim760\)K) makes CRMG a potential candidate for spintronic applications. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:03:40', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01624', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01624'} |
#
# Introduction [\[sec:Intro\]]{#sec:Intro label="sec:Intro"}
Simple nonlinear dynamical systems in which trajectories may escape through an artificial leak [^1] placed in the phase space play an important role in recent studies. Various fields of physics deal with either the escape dynamics of the particles or the decay rate of other physical quantities such as sound intensity, light rays, or fractal eigenstates. It has been pointed out that the escape dynamics strongly depends on the leak size, position, and orientation as well as on other pre-defined properties of the leak, for instance, the reflection coefficient. Probably the most interesting question is how the escape dynamics changes if the size of the leak varies. Altmann et al. presented numerical results about the relation between the escape rate and the leak size. In their study, however, the measure of the leak was adjusted manually in each case. Recently, Livorati et al. studied the escape in case of periodically driven holes. The main results of their work show parameter (amplitude, initial phases, and period of the oscillations) dependent fluctuations superimposed to the classical exponential decay. Although mathematicians are interested mostly in the limiting case of vanishing small leaks, in this work we present the decay dynamics through a continuously growing leak, where the size of the leak depends on a given physical property of the escaping particles. The motivation of this study comes from the application of leaky chaotic systems and crash tests in dynamical astronomy discussed in details below. The model of the growing leak introduced here results in a survival probability of non-escaped trajectories that is different from the well-known classical exponential decay. Moreover, we found a simple analytical solution describing the escape dynamics until the leak's expansion stops. A comprehensive numerical investigation is also performed to confirm our analytic results. The paper is organized as follows. After the Introduction, in Section [\[sec:model\]](#sec:model){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:model"}, the motivation as an astrophysical application is described. Then, we give a detailed description of the model of a growing leak and its simple numerical implementation to the standard map. The mathematical background is presented in Sections [\[sec:averaged_behaviour\]](#sec:averaged_behaviour){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:averaged_behaviour"}. Section [\[sec:num_res\]](#sec:num_res){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:num_res"} is devoted to numerical calculations in order to compare analytic results and simulations. Finally, we discuss our results and draw some conclusions in Section [\[sec:sum_disc\]](#sec:sum_disc){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:sum_disc"}.
# Model [\[sec:model\]]{#sec:model label="sec:model"}
## Motivation [\[sec:rtbp\]]{#sec:rtbp label="sec:rtbp"}
The motivation of the present study is the so-called planetary accretion process which is one of the two competing planet formation scenarios in these days. In this process the forming planetary embryo accretes particles from its vicinity until this region--the *feeding zone* [^2]--becomes empty. The increase of the planet depends on the mass of the particles hitting its surface. Obviously the smaller the embryo at the beginning of this process, the more significant the growth by the accretion. As a very simple model of this process one might consider the gravitational planar circular restricted three body problem (RTBP). In RTBP two point masses (star and planet) orbiting their barycenter on a circle and a third mass-less body (test particle) moves in their gravitational potential in the same plane. Although the planet (and also the star) is considered as a point mass, one can define the Hill radius (\(r_{\mathrm{H}}\)) in which its gravitational influence is dominant. The particles entering the Hill radius with an appropriate velocity, i.e. slower than the escape velocity from this domain, can be removed from the dynamics and marked as escaped. In addition, \(r_{\mathrm{H}}\) grows with the mass of the forming planet, see Eq. ([\[eq:rH\]](#eq:rH){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rH"}). Therefore, the growth of the planetary embryo can be considered as a growing leak in the phase space. Thus, from dynamical point of view, the accretion stage of the planet formation can be described via leaky chaotic systems. We give an estimate how the leak size depends on the mass in RTBP, see Appendix [\[appendix:size_mass\]](#appendix:size_mass){reference-type="ref" reference="appendix:size_mass"}. To illustrate the leaky RTBP, we plot the evolution of a large number of non-interacting test particles initially placed around the planet's orbit (see Figure [\[fig:rtbp\]](#fig:rtbp){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:rtbp"}). Different colors denote different end-states of particles. Trajectories starting from light gray (green online) points remain the part of the system during the whole integration (1000 orbits of the planet). Gray (red online) points represent test particles whose destination is the planet, more precisely, the half of the Hill radius with proper velocity [^3]. Dark gray (blue online) points indicate trajectories scattered out from the system by the planet. Although the effect of the planet's mass and size evolution in the RTBP is dominant only in very early stages of the planet formation, the idea of a growing leak, particularly when the size of the leak depends on a physical property of the leaving particles, might shed light on a new kind of escape dynamics generally in leaky chaotic systems.
## Growing leak model[\[sec:leak\]]{#sec:leak label="sec:leak"}
The discrete dynamical system we are to consider here consists a large number of particles and a leak, where under certain conditions, the particles can escape from the system. The particles are point masses with the same mass \(m\), their initial number is \(N_0\), while after \(i\) iterations we denote the number of surviving particles by \(N_i\). The leak also has an initial and an instantaneous mass, \(M_0\) and \(M_i\), respectively. When a particle falls into the leak, its mass is added to that of the leak, thus \[\begin{aligned}
M_i = M_0 + (N_0-N_i) \cdot m = \mathcal{M}-N_i \cdot m, \label{eq:leakmass} \end{aligned}\] where \(\mathcal{M} = M_0 + N_0 \cdot m\) is the total mass of the system. According to the RTBP (Appendix [\[appendix:size_mass\]](#appendix:size_mass){reference-type="ref" reference="appendix:size_mass"}) a reasonable choice is that the volume of the leak depends on its mass \(M_i\) in the form of \[\begin{aligned}
S_{\mathrm{leak}}(M_i) = C_{S} \cdot M_i^\gamma, \label{eq:T_leak} \end{aligned}\] where \(\gamma\) is a positive constant. The coefficient \(C_S\) can be written as \(C_S=C_P\cdot S_{\mathrm{total}}\). Here \(C_P>0\) denotes a normalization constant while \(S_{\mathrm{total}}\) is the volume of the ergodic part of the phase space. The factor \(C_P\) allows us to control the final size of the leak, (a leak of moderate size avoids excessive restructuring of the phase space). Let \(p\) be the escape probability that a particle leaves the system (through the leak) in the next iteration. We suppose that the escape probability is proportional to the actual size of the leak compared to the whole phase space, that is, \(p=S_{\mathrm{leak}}/S_{\mathrm{total}}.\) That is, the escape probability (see Eq. ([\[eq:T_leak\]](#eq:T_leak){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:T_leak"})) is given by \[\begin{aligned}
p(M_i) = C_p \cdot M_i^\gamma. \label{eq:escape_prob_M} \end{aligned}\] Generally, the escape probability is changing as the mass (and size) of the leak is increasing. At this point, it is useful to introduce some new constants and variables: \[\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{N} = \frac{\mathcal{M}}{m},\;\;\;\; \kappa_\infty = C_p \mathcal{M}^\gamma, \nonumber \label{eq:parameters} \end{aligned}\] \[\begin{aligned}
x_i = \frac{M_i}{\mathcal{M}},\;\;\;\;\; y_i = \frac{N_i}{\mathcal{N}} = N_i \frac{m}{\mathcal{M}}, \label{eq:norm_functs} \nonumber \end{aligned}\] where \(\mathcal{N}\) is the number of particles corresponding to the total mass \(\mathcal{M}\), \(\kappa_{\infty}\) is the asymptotic escape rate when all the mass of the system is in the leak, \(x\) is the ratio of the mass of the leak and the total mass (mass ratio), \(y\) is the ratio of the number of the particles which are outside the leak to the total number of the particles \(\mathcal{N}.\) It is obvious that \[\begin{aligned}
x_i + y_i = 1 \nonumber \end{aligned}\] for all time instant. We will use these dimensionless quantities through the rest of the paper. The assumption of a small leak in our model corresponds to the pure exponential survival probability, i.e. when the system shows strong chaotic properties. That is, if a static leak with size equal to the final size of the evolving leak (set by \(C_{\mathrm{P}}\)) produces exponential decay, we consider that this measure of the leak is small enough to our purposes and fits to the zero order approximation \(p=S_{\mathrm{leak}}/S_{\mathrm{total}},\) widely used in the literature, see for example. In addition, the exponential decay can also be observed in weakly chaotic systems for short times until the hyperbolic dynamics dominate. Furthermore, in case of weak chaos the growing leak in the model presented should avoid the quasiperiodic domain in the phase space. On the other hand, if the leak intersects the KAM tori during its growth, the survival probability will decay with lower different rate. In other words, since the regular domain behaves as a forbidden region for trajectories originating outside, the leak biting into it will have an unreachable part for those trajectories resulting in a different escape probability. However, this is no longer true when the leak originally contains islands or more precisely when the ratio of the regular islands inside and outside the leak remains constant.
## Simplified numerical experiment[\[sec:stmap\]]{#sec:stmap label="sec:stmap"}
In order to analyze the escape dynamics through a continuously growing leak defined by Eq. ([\[eq:escape_prob_M\]](#eq:escape_prob_M){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:escape_prob_M"}), we introduce a simple test system. Our numerical experiments are based on the standard map (\(\text{mod}\; 2\pi\)) which describes the Poincaré map of the kicked rotator. This choice makes it possible to check the leak's expansion in both co-ordinate and velocity directions, respectively. The standard map (SM) reads as follows \[\begin{split} I_{i+1}&=I_{i}+K\sin \Theta_{i},\\ \Theta_{i+1}&=\Theta_{i}+I_{i+1}. \end{split} \label{eq:SM}\] In Eq. ([\[eq:SM\]](#eq:SM){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:SM"}) \(K\) denotes the strength of the perturbation and allows to study either *fully hyperbolic dynamics* (\(K\)=5.19) or *mixed phase space* structure, e.g. \(K=2.7\). An other reason we consider the SM is that it allows us to mimic the conservative dynamics in the RTBP where regular islands are also embedded in the chaotic sea producing the well-known structure of the phase space similar to that in Fig. [\[fig:SM\]](#fig:SM){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SM"}. For simplicity, we presume that the leak grows equally in \(I\) and \(\Theta\) directions, i.e. it conserves its original shape. In order to avoid the early irregular effects in escape rate due to the location and density of the initial conditions, a threshold time is obtained before the leak is opened. Thus, we have a uniform distribution of the trajectories in the ergodic region of the phase space. The threshold time is set to be \(i=250\) in all simulations. Figure [\[fig:SM\]](#fig:SM){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SM"} shows the phase space portrait of the SM for \(K\)=2.7. We place a square-shaped leak centered at point \((I, \Theta)=\)(5,5) with initial size \((\Delta I,\Delta \Theta)=(0.01,0.01)\) (\(S_{leak}^{(0)}=10^{-4}\)) [^4] and store the number of escaped trajectories at every iteration step. The semi-diagonals indicate the expansion until the leak reaches its final size \((\Delta I,\Delta \Theta)\approx(0.316,0.316)\) (\(S_{leak}^{(\infty)}=0.1\)). Initial conditions are placed uniformly in the black square (\(3.2\leq \Theta\leq 3.7\), \(3.2\leq I\leq 3.7\)) far from KAM islands as well as the final leak. The result of a test run is displayed in Figure [\[fig:kappa_t\]](#fig:kappa_t){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:kappa_t"}. It is clearly visible that the well-known exponential decay of the non-escaped trajectories starts after \(\mathtt{\sim}\)`<!-- -->`{=html}3000 iterations (blue squares). Red triangles denote the instantaneous leak size, \(S_{\mathrm{leak}}\), which is growing rapidly until it reaches its final (\(\mathtt{\sim}\)`<!-- -->`{=html}90%) size. One can also observe that the exponential decay starts roughly when the expansion of the leak ceases. We can, thus, presume that the exponential behavior is a consequence of the stationary leak size with escape rate \(\kappa_{\infty}\). The semi-logarithmic plot of the non-escaped trajectories allows one to find the asymptotic escape rate, \(\kappa_{\infty}\) as \(t\to\infty\) (for strong chaotic regime). This simulation yields \(\kappa_{\infty}=0.00254\). Furthermore, the numerical investigation confirms the naive idea that until the leak's expansion is present, the instantaneous escape rate, \(\kappa(t),\) and also the escape probability is changing in time according to \(\mathrm{d}(\ln y_n)/\mathrm{d}t=-\kappa(t)\). However, when the growth slows down significantly \(\kappa(t)\) reaches the asymptotic escape rate \(\kappa_{\infty}\) (green asterisks), see Figure [\[fig:kappa_t\]](#fig:kappa_t){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:kappa_t"}. This behavior can be explained as follows. At the beginning of the simulation (\(t<2000\)) a very large number of escaping trajectories feed the small leak in one iteration step and, therefore, its mass (size) growth is accelerating. Beyond a certain limit the mass (or equivalently the number) of escaping particles in one iteration compared to the mass of the leak becomes small, i.e. escape is present with moderate increase of the leak size. In this case (\(2000\leq t\leq 5000\)), however, there are enough particles in the system to observe the exponential decay. The reason for the larger dispersion in \(\kappa(t)\) and its deviation from \(\kappa_{\infty}\) beyond \(t\approx 5000\) is twofold. On the one hand, the number of non-escaped trajectories, after 5000 iterations, becomes so small (\(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100) that the statistic is unreliable. On the other hand, Figure [\[fig:kappa_t\]](#fig:kappa_t){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:kappa_t"} shows the simulation for \(K\)=2.7, in which case KAM tori are responsible for stickiness and consequently a power-law decay of trajectories for longer escape times (not shown). In other words, \(\kappa(t)\) would follow the horizontal dashed line in case of the fully hyperbolic dynamics, for instance, \(K\ge\) 5.19, with an arbitrarily large \(N_0.\)
# Results [\[sec:results\]]{#sec:results label="sec:results"}
## Analytic solution [\[sec:averaged_behaviour\]]{#sec:averaged_behaviour label="sec:averaged_behaviour"}
After having some impression about the escape dynamics from numerical simulations, in this section, we show that a continuous approximation of the temporal behavior of the model can be described by analytic formulae. We consider the particle number \(N_i\) and all the other related discrete functions \(M_i\), \(x_i\), and \(y_i\) as being continuous functions \(N(t)\), \(M(t)\), \(x(t)\), and \(y(t)\). Practically, we can do that because the particle number and the typical timescale (number of iterations) of the process is also much higher than unity (\(N_0\gg1\)). The time derivative of \(N(t)\) is approximately the negative of the average number of escaping particles \(\Delta N\) during one iteration which is \(p \cdot N\), so we can write \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}t}\approx \Delta N =-p \cdot N =-C_p \cdot M^\gamma \cdot N \label{eq:N derivative} \end{aligned}\] where we used Eq. ([\[eq:escape_prob_M\]](#eq:escape_prob_M){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:escape_prob_M"}). As \(\Delta M =-\Delta N \cdot m\), the time derivative of \(M(t)\) is \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\mathrm{d}M}{\mathrm{d}t}\approx C_p \cdot M^\gamma \cdot N \cdot m. \label{eq:M derivative} \end{aligned}\] Combining Eq. ([\[eq:M derivative\]](#eq:M derivative){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:M derivative"}), \(M(t) = x(t) \cdot \mathcal{M}\), and \(N(t) = y(t) \cdot \mathcal{N}=(1-x(t)) \cdot \mathcal{M}/m\), we get a first-order separable ordinary differential equation for \(x(t)\): \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\mathrm{d}x}{\mathrm{d}t} = \kappa_{\infty} \cdot x^\gamma \cdot \left( 1-x \right), \label{eq:ode for x} \end{aligned}\] Derivation of the solution can be found in Appendix [\[appendix:solution_of_eq\]](#appendix:solution_of_eq){reference-type="ref" reference="appendix:solution_of_eq"}. Equation ([\[eq:ode for x\]](#eq:ode for x){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ode for x"}) is a continuous approximation of the recursive difference equation \[\begin{aligned}
x_{i+1}=x_i + \Delta x_i \label{eq_discrete} \end{aligned}\] where \(\Delta x_i = \kappa_\infty \cdot x_i^\gamma \cdot \left( 1-x_i \right)\), which gives the exact description of the discrete-time problem. The implicit solution of ([\[eq:ode for x\]](#eq:ode for x){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ode for x"}) can be given by \[\begin{aligned}
t(x)= \frac{x^{1-\gamma}}{\kappa_{\infty} \cdot (1-\gamma)}\; {}_2F_1\left(1-\gamma,1;2-\gamma;x\right)-\tau \label{eq:sol} \end{aligned}\] where the constant of integration \(\tau\) follows from the initial value \(x_0\) as \[\begin{aligned}
\tau = \frac{x_0^{1-\gamma}}{\kappa_{\infty} \cdot (1-\gamma)}\; {}_2F_1\left(1-\gamma,1;2-\gamma;x_0\right). \label{eq:int_const} \end{aligned}\] The solution of Eq. ([\[eq:ode for x\]](#eq:ode for x){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ode for x"}), \(x(t),\) has a point of inflection (PoI) for all \(\gamma>0.\) The second derivative of \(x\) from ([\[eq:ode for x\]](#eq:ode for x){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ode for x"}) \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{\mathrm{d}^2x}{\mathrm{d}t^2} = \kappa_{\infty} \cdot x^{\gamma-1} \cdot \frac{\mathrm{d}x}{\mathrm{d}t} \cdot \left[\gamma-( 1 + \gamma )\cdot x \right], \nonumber \end{aligned}\] from which the \(x\) coordinate of the inflection point (\(x_{\mathrm{PoI}}\)) can be obtained \[\begin{aligned}
x_{\mathrm{PoI}} = \frac{\gamma}{1 + \gamma}. \end{aligned}\] We further elaborate on the error properties of the above solution in Appendix [\[appendix:error\]](#appendix:error){reference-type="ref" reference="appendix:error"}. We can distinguish two parts of the leak-growing process. The separatrix is the point of inflection of the \(x(t)\) function. Figure [\[fig:analytical\]](#fig:analytical){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:analytical"} shows the functions \(x(t)\) for different \(\gamma\)s. For the sake of comparison the graphs are shifted leftward, thus, the inflection points are placed exactly above a row at \(t=0.\) The mass growth \(x(t)\) beyond the point \(x_{\mathrm{PoI}}\) (or \(t=0\)) has the same characteristic for different \(\gamma\)s. The reason is that in the limit \(t \rightarrow \infty\), \(x \rightarrow 1,\) Eq. ([\[eq:ode for x\]](#eq:ode for x){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ode for x"}) can be written as \(\mathrm{d}x/\mathrm{d}t \approx-\kappa_{\infty}x\) which means that function \(x(t)\) approximates 1 exponentially with exponent \(-\kappa_{\infty}\) and the process does not depend on \(\gamma.\) This is, however, not the case to the left of the point of inflection. In the limit of \(x\rightarrow 0\), Eq. ([\[eq:ode for x\]](#eq:ode for x){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ode for x"}) can be written as \(\mathrm{d}x/\mathrm{d}t \approx \kappa_{\infty}x^\gamma\) which means that the solution \(x(t)\approx\left[\kappa_{\infty} (1-\gamma) (t +\tau)\right]^{\frac{1}{1-\gamma}}\) follows a power-law and contains both \(\kappa_{\infty}\) and \(\gamma.\) Furthermore, in this regime \(\gamma\) defines two different behaviors. Considering the case of \(\gamma<1\) we have a point where \(x(-\tau)=0.\) That is, the integration constant \(\tau\) is suitable to determine a time instant in the past when the mass of the leak was zero, i.e. when the whole growing process began. While in the case of \(\gamma \ge 1\) the function \(x(t)\) approaches zero only in the limit of \(t \to-\infty.\) In summary \[\begin{aligned}
\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} t = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -\tau &\;\;\; \textrm{for \(0\le\gamma<1\),}\\ -\infty &\;\;\; \textrm{for \(1\le\gamma\).} \end{array} \right. \label{eq_limit_of_t} \end{aligned}\] Nevertheless, it is obvious from Eq. ([\[eq:ode for x\]](#eq:ode for x){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ode for x"}) that \(\kappa_{\infty}\) is inversely proportional to the timescale of the process. The condition that the timescale have to be much higher than unity is equivalent to \(1/\kappa_{\infty} \gg 1\). This fact is important to ensure that the continuous time approximation, Eqs. ([\[eq:N derivative\]](#eq:N derivative){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:N derivative"}) and ([\[eq:M derivative\]](#eq:M derivative){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:M derivative"}), is valid in our model. The adopted model of growing leak defines a stochastic process, whose complete description is possible only by using the probability theory. The question arises naturally, how the probability mass function of the particle number can be calculated after the \(i\)th iteration if the initial one is known? The question is important because if the standard deviations are considerable, then we need the probability mass functions in order to have a complete description. Otherwise, the averaged behavior, studied previously, describes the process well. In Appendix [\[appendix:distr\]](#appendix:distr){reference-type="ref" reference="appendix:distr"} we derive the probability mass functions, and study its properties this problem. We should mention that during the calculation we assumed that \(\gamma>0.\) However, it is obvious that solutions of Eq. ([\[eq:ode for x\]](#eq:ode for x){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ode for x"}) can also be found for negative exponents in a similar way. The discussion of the case \(\gamma<0\) is beyond the scope of the present study.
## Numerical tests [\[sec:num_res\]]{#sec:num_res label="sec:num_res"}
After discussing the analytic description of the survival probability, we confirm the validity of our calculations by running several numerical simulations. In order to demonstrate the general phenomenon of escape dynamics, we use different \(\gamma\) values in our calculations. First, the results of the hyperbolic and mixed dynamics are compared. In this calculation we show that for different system parameters \(K=2.7\text{ and }5.19\) the analytical solution works very well. Figure [\[fig:gamma1\]](#fig:gamma1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:gamma1"}(a) shows the ratio of non-escaping trajectories \(y(t)\) for the \(\gamma=1\) case, i.e. the leak size depends linearly on mass. One can easily see that the analytical solution (dashed and dotted dashed lines) fit the numerical data fairly accurately, especially for small iteration numbers, \(t<2000.\) In order to be able to compare the accuracy of the results quantitatively, we calculate the relative difference between the simulated data (S) and the analytic solution (C). The difference \(S-C\) in percentages is plotted in Figure [\[fig:gamma1\]](#fig:gamma1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:gamma1"}(b). It shows the same tendency what we can observe by naked eye in panel (a). The \(S-C\) diagram remains under 4% level until \(t\approx 2500.\) In addition, \(S-C\) shows that in the case of \(\gamma=1\) the analytic solution is more accurate for fully hyperbolic dynamics (\(K=5.19\)) than for mixed phase space (\(K=2.7\)) for \(t>2500\). The reason of that comes form Eq. ([\[eq:sol gamma 1\]](#eq:sol gamma 1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:sol gamma 1"}), since it turns to be purely exponential for \(t\gg 1\), that is \(y(t)\sim exp(-\kappa_{\infty} t)\). In addition, the decay of \(y(t)\) in the latter case starts to deviate from the exponential due to the sticky effect of the KAM tori. Physically more interesting cases are when \(\gamma\neq1\) but rational. Let us recall our motivation, the planet formation analogy in the planar RTBP. The size of the leak in the phase space in this particular case is proportional to \(m_p^{4/3},\) see Eq. ([\[eq:hole2D\]](#eq:hole2D){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:hole2D"}) in the Appendix. Figure [\[fig:gamma43\]](#fig:gamma43){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:gamma43"}(a) shows the number of surviving particles, \(x(t),\) and the mass growth of the leak, \(y(t),\) for \(\gamma=4/3\) (squares and triangles, respectively). The analytic solution goes together with the numerical simulation also for this value of \(\gamma.\) As is well seen in panel (b) the \(S-C\) diagram remains under the 5% level until the leak reaches its final mass, \(t\approx8000.\) This is not true, however, at the very beginning of the iteration, \(t<10\) after opening the leak. In this regime sudden changes in the number of escaping trajectories appear. Trajectories situated exactly 'above' the leak and its pre-images disappear immediately from the system. This rapid change in the number of particles is, however, not covered by the analytic solution and, consequently, large differences may show up in the first phase of the \(S-C\) diagram. In the previous two examples we considered particles with equal masses, \(m=1.\) A more realistic scenario is when the particles in various physical problems have different masses corresponding to a certain distribution. The log-normal distribution is a good choice to describe the particle size (and/or mass). We present a simulation for \(\gamma=2/3\) with different kind of mass distributions, see Figure [\[fig:logn\]](#fig:logn){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:logn"}. The numerical results in panel (a) show what can also be derived directly from Equations ([\[eq:N derivative\]](#eq:N derivative){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:N derivative"}) and ([\[eq:M derivative\]](#eq:M derivative){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:M derivative"}): *the mass growth of the leak does not depend on the mass of the individual particles but only on the mean value of the distribution.* Consequently, the leak's mass changes in time with the same rate for both equal mass particles (pink squares) and log-normal distribution (red triangles), and also for other distributions such as uniform and normal (stars and circles in Figure [\[fig:logn\]](#fig:logn){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:logn"}(a), respectively). The statistical fluctuations in leak's mass, smaller than 15%, disappear after 200 iterations, panel (b).
# Summary and Discussion[\[sec:sum_disc\]]{#sec:sum_disc label="sec:sum_disc"}
The model Equations ([\[eq:N derivative\]](#eq:N derivative){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:N derivative"}) and ([\[eq:M derivative\]](#eq:M derivative){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:M derivative"}) describe the escape dynamics in a leaky chaotic system when the size of the leak is growing in time and the expansion depends on the particles' mass. Consequently, the escape probability is time-dependent. The analytic solution to the problem provides a power-law behavior at the very early stage (\(x\approx 0\)) of the dynamical evolution. This phase depends on the exponent \(\gamma\) in Eq. ([\[eq:T_leak\]](#eq:T_leak){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:T_leak"}). However, for larger \(t,\) when the feeding of the leak diminishes, the survival decay turns to be exponential. Between these two limits the escape rate is time dependent. The qualitative picture is the following. After the leak reaches roughly the 90% of its final measure, or more precisely, beyond the point of inflection of \(x(t)\), the speed of the growth slows down. After this point the growth of the leak is so slow that it can be thought of as a static leak, and the decay rate turns to be exponential, see Figure [\[fig:holevelo\]](#fig:holevelo){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:holevelo"}(a). Numerical simulations verify that the escape rate \(\kappa_{\infty}\) (short thick solid line) for a static leak (red triangles) of size 0.1 is the same as in the case of a growing leak (blue squares) when it reaches 90% of its final size (also 0.1), panel (a). In addition, this behavior is in a very good agreement with the analytical solution describing the early stage escape dynamics. The effect is considerable for relatively short times only as long as enough number of particles are in the system, therefore, the presence of the well-known power-law decay of stickiness (tail of the distribution) in mixed phase space is not affected by the size variation of the leak. However, the crossover time, when the nonhyperbolic part of the chaotic saddle starts to dominate, can be updated. The crossover time \(t_{\mathrm{cross}}\) in weakly chaotic regime is written as follows (Eq. (89) in ) \[t_{\mathrm{cross}}\sim 1/\kappa_{\infty}\] with the assumption that the leak size is small. The growing leak model provides a simple generaliztion of this naive approximation in \(\gamma\leq 1\) case \[t_{\mathrm{cross}}\sim \frac{1}{\kappa_{\infty}}\left[1+\frac{x^{1-\gamma}}{1-\gamma}+\frac{(1+\gamma)^{1+\gamma}}{\gamma^{\gamma}}\frac{\gamma}{1+\gamma}\right],\] where the second and the third terms in the bracket define the shift (\(t_{\mathrm{shift}}\)) the crossover experiences, see the shematic view in Fig. [\[fig:holevelo\]](#fig:holevelo){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:holevelo"}b. The second term is the time of the growth until the leak mass is moderate, see the approximation of Eq. ([\[eq:ode for x\]](#eq:ode for x){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ode for x"}) when \(x\ll1\), while the third term can be derived from the slope of the function \(x(t)\) at point \(x_{\mathrm{PoI}}\), Fig. [\[fig:analytical\]](#fig:analytical){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:analytical"}. It can be easily obtained that \(t_{\mathrm{shift}}\to 0\) when \(\gamma\to 0\) and \(x\ll1\). Equation ([\[eq:sol_gamma0\]](#eq:sol_gamma0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:sol_gamma0"}) properly describes also the limit case \(m_{i}\to 0.\) Namely, if the mass of the particles tends to zero, i.e. the growth of the leak is fairly slow, one recovers the classical exponential decay for the surviving trajectories. We note that the same effect can be seen when the initial mass of the leak \(x_{0}\) is set so large that even the massive particles (\(m_{i}>0\)) falling into it do not have any effect on the leak's mass and, therefore, it can be considered as a static leak. Due to the leak expansion we can consider an instantaneous chaotic saddle in our model at every time step. This object is reducing as the leak is growing and converges to that invariant set which corresponds to the final leak size. This process results in a temporally changing chaotic saddle and a non-stationary exponent of the survival probability (escape rate \(\kappa(t)\)). A similar phenomenon can be found in where the exponent is also time dependent (see Eq. (1) in ). In contrast of the similarity, the temporarily changing chaotic saddle should not be confused with the transient chaotic saddle introduced in. In summary, we have presented an analytic description of the escape of the trajectories through a continuously growing leak both in fully hyperbolic and in mixed phase space. We stress, however, that during the whole calculation we did not utilize explicitely the fact that \(m\) is the mass of the particle, though the basic motivation is related to the mass growth of a planetary embryo. Therefore, one can reformulate the model in a more general way. Let us write Eqs. ([\[eq:leakmass\]](#eq:leakmass){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:leakmass"}), ([\[eq:T_leak\]](#eq:T_leak){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:T_leak"}), and ([\[eq:escape_prob_M\]](#eq:escape_prob_M){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:escape_prob_M"}) together as follows \[\begin{split} M_i &= M_0 + (N_0-N_i) m = \mathcal{M}-N_i m,\\ S_{\mathrm{leak},i}& = C_{S} M_i^\gamma,\\ p_i &= C_p M_i^\gamma, \label{eq:escape_prob_M_general} \nonumber \end{split}\] where now \(m\) is a physical property of the particles, \(M_n\text{ and } M_0\) are the evolved and initial additive property of the leak, and \(\mathcal{M} = M_0 + N_0 m.\) Other quantities are the same as given in the introduction of the model in Section [\[sec:leak\]](#sec:leak){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:leak"}. This means that the analytical method presented in this paper might be suitable to predict the characteristics of the escape dynamics in different kinds of systems where the leak size depends on some specific physical property of the particles (charge, spin, energy level, chemical composition, etc.). We also would like to draw the attention to the limitation of present model. In fact, the dynamics in the standard map does not depend on the size of the leak. In other words, the leak affects only the escape rate but not the individual survival trajectories themselves. This is not the case, for instance, in the restricted three body problem, where the growing planetary mass governs the dynamics of the surviving particles and, therefore, should also modify the escape dynamics. Considering such an extension in the SM, a natural choice could be the introduction of a variable nonlinearity parameter \(K(M)\) whose value could also depend on the leak mass/size. Studying this effect is postponed to future studies.
[^1]: Artificial means in this context that if the leak is not present, escape cannot occur at that part of the phase space.
[^2]: The planetary feeding zone is basically the basin of attraction of a given leak where the leak in phase space can be considered as the forming planetesimal.
[^3]: Since we consider the planet as a point mass, crash of the particles and the planetary embryo is difficult to calculate numerically. Consequently, half of the Hill radius is chosen as a region wherein the particles are thought to be accreted by the forming planet. This is, obviously, more rigorous criterion than one Hill radius.
[^4]: Note that the mass and the size of the leak are identical parameters of the problem. The instantaneous size can be obtained from the current mass and vice versa. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:06:42', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01759', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01759'} |
# Introduction
Deep Learning systems have surpassed other algorithms and even humans at several tasks . While their applications continue to grow, deep learning systems are still considered black-box optimization methods. One of the most vital features behind their success is their ability to extract relevant yet minimal information as it progresses into deeper and deeper layers. This is an extension of *Rate Coding Theory* presented as the *Information Bottleneck* principle . The information bottleneck principle has been primarily focused on systems that are (a) feedforward, and (b) in an open-loop, decoupled from their environment. Neuroscientists, on the other hand, have long been studying the principles behind encoding and representation of environmental information in neural activity using principles of information theory and rate distortion theory . Continuous variables from the environment are encoded as discrete spikes in the brain, which are then decoded to produce smooth continuous movement. Due to experimental limitations, an informational analysis of a closed-loop brain-body-environment behaviour system is not yet feasible. We take a radically different approach to understanding information flow in a behaviorally-functional agent. We artificially evolve embodied agents controlled by recurrent spiking neural networks to perform a task. For this paper, we focus on a non-Markovian version of the classical pole balancing task. Pole balancing has been explored quite extensively as a benchmark for control using neural networks . With continuous states and actions, this task serves as an ideal setting to study the transformation of the continuous input information into spikes and then back to continuous action. While the typical task is Markovian, and thus too trivial for an informational analysis, it can easily be transformed into a non-Markovian task by making the available information to the agent limited. Our approach to pole balancing incorporates an agent-centric "visual" interface to the pole. Therefore, information that is typically available, like the pole's angle and angular velocity, the agent's position and velocity, are not fed directly to the network. Ultimately, the minimal nature of the task makes it tractable for an investigation of a recurrent network in a closed-loop task. The parameters of the recurrent spiking neural network that balances the pole were optimized using an evolutionary algorithm. Evolving neural networks as opposed to hand-designing them allows maximum flexibility for exploring the parameter space. While evolutionary algorithms have been very commonly used in several fields , recently, they have been proven to be efficient for optimizing deep neural networks as well . Moreover, due to the stochastic nature of the optimization, running the algorithm several times provides us with an ensemble of solutions that solve the problem. This allows the analysis of not just one solution but several to evaluate consistency of results. The paper is organized as follows. In the first section we report on the agent, task, optimization technique, and analysis method. The section that follows presents an informational analysis for the best and top performing agents. In the last section we summarize the results.
# Methods
*Agent design.* The agent lives in a 1-dimensional world with the pole attached to its center. Seven equidistant rays of "vision" with overlapping receptive fields spanning 36provide it with sensory stimuli (Fig. [\[fig:setUp\]](#fig:setUp){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:setUp"}A,B). The control network of the agent has three primary components: sensory units, spiking interneurons, and motor units. There is one sensory units per ray, which merely pass on the signal received from the rays. Sensory units are fully connected to \(N\) interneurons (here \(N=2\)), modeled by Izhikevich spiking neuron model. The model has 4 parameters per neuron and is governed by a two-dimensional system of ordinary differential equations . Interneurons are recurrently connected (Fig. [\[fig:setUp\]](#fig:setUp){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:setUp"}C). Therefore, each interneuron receives weighted input from each sensory unit, \(S_i\), and from other spiking interneurons, \(I_i\), as follows: \[S_i+I_i = \sum_{j=1}^7 w_{ji}^s s_j + \sum_{j=1}^N w_{ji}^i o_i\] where \(s_j\) is the input at the \(j^{\text{\tiny th}}\) sensory unit, \(w_{ji}^s\) is the strength of the connection from the \(j^{\text{\tiny th}}\) sensory unit to the \(i^{\text{\tiny th}}\) spiking interneuron, \(w_{ji}^i\) is the strength of the recurrent connections from the \(j^{\text{\tiny th}}\) to the \(i^{\text{\tiny th}}\) spiking neuron, and \(o_i\) is the output of the neuron. The sign of all outgoing connections from an interneuron depends on its excitatory or inhibitory nature, as identified by a binary parameter. Finally, the layer of interneurons feeds into the two motor neurons, that has the following state equation: \[\tau_m \dot{m_i} =-m_i + \sum_{j=1}^N w_{ji}^m \bar{o}_j \quad i = 1,2\] \[\bar{o}_j(t)= \frac{1}{h_j} \sum_{k=0}^{h_j} o_j(t-k)\] where \(m_i\) represents the motor neuron state, \(w_{ji}^m\) is the strength of the connection from the \(j^{\text{\tiny th}}\) spiking interneuron to the \(i^{\text{\tiny th}}\) motor neuron, \(\bar{o}_j\) represents the firing rate code, the moving average over a window of length \(h_j\) for the output of spiking interneuron \(j\). Finally, the difference in output between the motor neurons results in a net force that acts upon the agent, moving it along the track. The network was simulated using Euler integration with step size 0.01. *Pole Balancing Task Design.* The agent can move left/right to balance a pole for as long as possible. The pole-balancing task was implemented based on published descriptions . The force from the agent, computed as the difference between motor unit outputs, affects the angular acceleration of the pole and acceleration of the agent. The physical parameters such as mass, length and coefficient of friction were all set as per the same reference. While typically pole-balancers receive as input the angle of the pole (\(\theta\)), its angular velocity (\(\omega\)), the agent's position (\(x\)) and velocity (\(v\)), our implementation was modified to only sense the pole through the sensory rays. *Evolutionary Algorithm.* The network was optimized using a real valued evolutionary algorithm. A solution was encoded by 38 parameters, including the intrinsic parameters of the Izhikevich neurons, the neuron-specific size of the window for estimating rate code, all connection weights (sensory-interneuron, interneuron-interneuron, interneuron-motor), and the time constant, bias and gain for the motor units. Parameters were constrained to certain ranges: connection strengths \(\in\) \([-50,50]\); motor unit biases \(\in\) \([-4,4]\); time-constants \(\in\) \([1,2]\). The range of intrinsic parameters and the polarity of the outgoing weights from the inter-neuron depended on a binary inhibitory/excitatory neuron flag parameter in the genotype . The population consisted of 100 individuals. *Fitness Function.* Performance was estimated by averaging over 16 trials, starting at pole angles \(\theta_0\) between \(\pm12\degree\), in increments of 3, and two initial angular velocities, \(\omega_0=\pm0.001\). The fitness function to be maximized was \(f=(\sum_{t=1}^{T} cos(\theta_t))/T\), where \(T=500s\) is the maximum duration of the run. The pole was considered balanced if it was within the sensory range of the agent. Also, the track length was fixed at \(45\) units, beyond which the trial was terminated. *Mutual Information.* The amount of information contained in one variable about another was estimated using Mutual Information (MI). We quantified the information that neurons contain about pole angle (\(\theta\)), angular velocity (\(\omega\)), agent position (\(x\)) and agent velocity (\(v\)) by calculating their probability distributions (using a binning method with each bin of width 0.01): \[MI(N,X) = \sum_{n \in N}\sum_{x \in X} p(x,n)log\frac{p(x,n)}{p(x) p(n)}\]
# Results
*Performance of evolutionary optimization.* While pole balancing is a well-known benchmark, it was also a relatively easy task to optimize. The evolutionary algorithm found fairly good solutions (around 75% performance) at the very first random draw of the population. Fig. [\[fig:bestAgent\]](#fig:bestAgent){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:bestAgent"}A shows the performance of the best agent in every generation over time. Out of the \(100\) evolutionary runs, \(99\) converged to over \(99\%\) fitness with only two spiking interneurons. *Network structure and performance of the best agent.* The network structure of the best agent from the \(100\) runs is shown in Fig. [\[fig:bestAgent\]](#fig:bestAgent){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:bestAgent"}B. The behavioral traces of this agent on the 16 trials specified in the previous section are shown in Fig. [\[fig:bestInfoArch\]](#fig:bestInfoArch){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:bestInfoArch"}A. This agent achieved a fitness of \(99.4\%\). To test for generalization, its performance was evaluated on a finer and broader range of conditions, post-optimization (Fig. [\[fig:bestAgent\]](#fig:bestAgent){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:bestAgent"}C): initial pole angle \(\theta_0\) in the range \([-45,45]\) and initial pole angular velocity \(\omega_0\) in the range \([-0.01,0.01]\). As can be seen, the agent generalizes well within and outside the region it was evolved on. Note that \(\theta_0\) that are beyond \(18\degree\) on either side are beyond the range of the sensory rays. *Encoding of environmental variables.* The different network elements that manipulate the input are shown in Fig. [\[fig:bestInfoArch\]](#fig:bestInfoArch){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:bestInfoArch"}B. Sensory signals first act on neurons' potential. The neuron fires based on dynamics in its potential, which is then interpreted by its rate. The motor units then convert this discrete spike rate to smooth continuous movement. Note that a single neuron has three levels of informational content-continuous valued potential, binary spikes, and discrete spike rate codes. Fig. [\[fig:bestInfoArch\]](#fig:bestInfoArch){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:bestInfoArch"}C shows traces for the highlighted trial in Fig. [\[fig:bestInfoArch\]](#fig:bestInfoArch){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:bestInfoArch"}A of the best agent. Although \(\theta\) is the most directly available information, unlike the standard practice of directly providing it, the sensory rays provide an agent-centric perspective of \(\theta\). MI between each of the network elements with \(\theta\), see Fig. [\[fig:bestInfoArch\]](#fig:bestInfoArch){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:bestInfoArch"}D, revealed that internal potential of neurons have relatively more information about \(\theta\) than the spike rate and so does the motor units. Albeit only for one trial in one agent, this shows that the bottleneck does not always become narrow in control tasks. MI also reveals that indirect encoding of \(\omega\), \(x\) and \(v\) all happen in the very first stage of the network, neuron potential (black bars in Fig. [\[fig:vrSignificance\]](#fig:vrSignificance){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:vrSignificance"}). This can be attributed to the recurrent nature of connections between the interneurons and also their rather complex non-linear internal dynamics. *Analysis of the Information Bottleneck.* All available information, as shown by MI in \(V\), is not necessarily used in controlling movement, as shown by relatively lower information in \(R\). To further study the bottleneck, we compared the amount of information contained in neuron potentials, \(V\), versus the rate coded outputs of the neurons, \(R\). Note that the spikes themselves do not have any information about the environment but, in fact, encode them in its rate. For each of the environmental variables a paired samples t-test was conducted with a significance threshold of \(p<0.05\). This revealed that there is a significant drop in the amount of information between \(V\) and \(R\) (Fig. [\[fig:vrSignificance\]](#fig:vrSignificance){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:vrSignificance"}) robustly across the top ten agents. This can be attributed to the loss due to the discretization of information available in \(V\) as spikes. However, the information in \(R\) is sufficient to perform the behavior with great accuracy and so this is in fact an efficient encoding of information. The minimal yet relevant information that is encoded in \(R\) is interpreted by the motor units. They integrate \(R\) from the interneurons and their outputs directly impact \(\theta\), \(\omega\), \(x\) and \(v\) and so this is where a deviation from the IB principle is expected. Statistical analyses of the MI between \(R\) and the motor units state, \(M\), using the paired samples t-test yielded highly significant (\(p\ll0.05\)) increase in information about all environmental variables in \(M\) (Fig. [\[fig:vrSignificance\]](#fig:vrSignificance){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:vrSignificance"}). This shows that the IB for control tasks is not always a filtering of information but is rather filtering followed by an expansion at the control layer. *Context sensitive information encoding.* From previous analysis, we know that components of the network encode information about the environment. But what information do they encode? Typically, when a neuron is said to encode information about a feature of the environment it is thought to be a consistent, context-independent code. To explore this idea further, we compared the MI the neuron potential has about the pole's angle \(I(V,\theta)\) on a trial by trial basis to the information that same neuron has across all trials about the same feature of the environment on the best agent (Fig. [\[fig:bestInfoArch\]](#fig:bestInfoArch){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:bestInfoArch"}E) and the top 10 agents. A one-sample t-test of the combined MI with the distribution of trial-by-trial MI values yielded a highly significant difference (\(p\ll0.05\)). This means that the combined information is significantly lower than trial-by-trial information, and therefore that encoding is highly context-dependent across all evolved pole-balancers.
# Discussion
In this paper, we have presented results from an information theoretic analysis of recurrent spiking neural networks that were evolved to perform a continuous control task: agent-centric non-Markovian pole balancing. Our results can be summarized as follows. First, networks with as few as two spiking neurons could be evolved to perform this task. Second, through the use of MI, we show that the spiking network encoded environmental variables of interest that were directly and indirectly available. Third, we show that the information bottleneck from the neuron potential to its firing rate is an efficient filtering/compression, which was followed by an increase in information at the control layer on account of their causal effect on the environment. This is a phenomenon that we expect to arise in control tasks in general, and plan to explore further with different tasks and types of networks. Perhaps, this can develop into an optimization method for neural network control. Finally, we show that the information encoded in the spiking neurons vary across trials, causing the across-trial combined information to be significantly lower. This can mean either that the same stimuli are encoded in different ways (redundancy) or that different stimuli are mapped on to the same encoding (generalization) or both. This warrants further analysis to understand the encoding in more detail and more interestingly, to understand how the context helps disambiguate the generalized representations during a trial. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:08:11', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01831', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01831'} |
# Introduction
A semi-quantitative relation between dynamical properties like diffusivity or relaxation times and the thermodynamics has been proposed by Rosenfeld and recently it has been extensively studied for different systems[@Goel_charu; @murari_charu_2010_jcp; @Ruchi_charu_2006; @manish_charu; @Murari_charu_jcp; @agarwal2009relationship; @dhabal2016comparison]. The relationship suggests that the fluid should follow \(X^*=C \exp [-K S_{ex}]\), where \(X^*\) is the dimensionless dynamical quantity and \(S_{ex}\) is excess entropy which is the difference between the total thermodynamic entropy (\(S_{tot}\)) and the corresponding ideal gas entropy (\(S_{id}\)) at the same temperature (\(T\)) and density (\(\rho\)). C and K are the constants in the Rosenfeld relation. In a liquid due to the structural correlation the total entropy is less than the corresponding ideal gas entropy. Thus, the excess entropy has a negative value. It can also be expanded in an infinite series, \(S_{ex}= S_2+S_3+....S_n\), where \(S_n\) is the entropic contribution due to n-particle spatial correlation. For a binary system, the entropic contribution due to the pair correlation (\(S_2\)) can be written in terms of the partial radial distribution functions, \[\frac{S_{2}}{k_{B}}=-\frac{\rho}{2} \sum_{\alpha,\beta}x_{\alpha} x_{\beta} \int_0^{\infty} \{g_{{\alpha}{ \beta}}(r) \ln g_{{\alpha} {\beta}}(r)-[g_{{\alpha}{\beta}}(r)-1]\} d {\bf r}, \label{s2_final}\] where \(g_{{\alpha}{ \beta}}(r)\) is the pair correlation between particles of type \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\), \(\rho\) is the density of the system, \(x_{\alpha}\) is the mole fraction of component \(\alpha\) in the mixture, and \(k_B\) is the Boltzmann constant. Thus the excess entropy can be written as a contribution from the pair, \(S_2\) and higher order terms, \(\Delta S\). The \(\Delta S\) contains all the contribution beyond two particles and is written as, \[\Delta S= S_{ex}-S_2=\sum_{n=3}^{ \infty}S_{n},\] where, \(S_n\) is the entropic contribution due to n-particle spatial correlation. In liquid state theory, the structure of a liquid is primarily described by radial distribution function and hence its entropic contribution plays a crucial role in predicting the dynamical quantities. For simple liquids the pair entropy \(S_{2}\) provides \(80\%-90\%\) contribution to the excess entropy [@Baranyai-cp; @murari_charu_2010_jcp]. Based on this microscopic picture, Dzugutov proposed a relationship between pair excess entropy \(S_2\) and dynamical quantity which is given by \(X^*=C_1 \exp [-K_1 S_{2}]\). Therefore, the Dzugutov scaling law is considered as a special case of the Rosenfeld scaling. Although the Rosenfeld relation is semi-empirical in nature, Bagchi and coworkers have derived it using the connection between excess entropy and Zwanzig's rugged energy landscape model of diffusion . Samanta *et al.* have found that the mode coupling diffusion coefficient can be fitted to the Rosenfeld scaling under certain approximations. In a recent study we find that mode coupling theory (MCT) vertex is related to pair excess entropy and higher order MCT calculation in the schematic limit can provide the phenomenological Rosenfeld relation. Thus, the scaling law has been derived using different theories. The Rosenfeld scaling relation is found to be valid for a wide variety of liquids including simple liquids, water, ionic melts, model polymeric melts and even for the data obtained in different experiments. However the Rosenfeld behaviour is not same for all the systems. For most of the systems like simple liquids and water the scaling breaks down in the low temperature regime. For ionic liquids, the Rosenfeld relationship is found to be valid up to much lower temperature and the value of the Rosenfeld exponents are different from that found for simple liquids. The ionic melts are known to be network forming liquids. Recently Coslovich and Pastore have proposed a new model of a simple liquid (NTW model) which mimics the properties like the structure and the dynamics of the network forming liquids. Since earlier studies have reported the Rosenfeld behaviour to be different for simple and network forming liquids, it will be interestingly to investigate the Rosenfeld scaling of the NTW model. In this present work, using molecular dynamics simulations we perform a comparative study of the validity of the Rosenfeld relation for a few simple liquids, the LJ system, its repulsive counterpart known as WCA (Weeks-Chandler-Andersen) system and the NTW model. The earlier study of the Rosenfeld relationship for the LJ and WCA systems have been performed in a moderate density range (\(1.05-1.25\)). Here we study a higher density range from 1.2 to 1.6 and find that the LJ and WCA systems follow the Rosenfeld and Dzugutov scaling laws only up to moderately high temperature. On the other hand, similar to that found for ionic melts the Rosenfeld relationship for the NTW model is valid upto a much lower temperature. However, the Rosenfeld exponent at high temperature appears to be similar to that found for simple liquids which is different from the value obtained for the ionic melts. Thus our result shows that the NTW model has mixed characteristics of simple liquids and ionic melts. We show a connection between the validity of the Rosenfeld relation and the Arrhenius behaviour. Our study predicts that for the NTW model the validity of the Rosenfeld relation at the low temperature is connected to it being a strong liquid. We also study the independent role of pair entropy and residual multiparticle entropy on the dynamics as function of fragility of the system. The paper is organized as follows: The simulation details are given in Sec. II. In Sec. III we describe the methods used for evaluating the various quantities of interest and provide other necessary background. Sec. IV contains a discussion of presented results and Sec. V contains a brief conclusion.
# Simulation Details
In this study, we perform extensive molecular dynamics simulations for three-dimensional binary mixtures in the canonical ensemble. The system contains \(N_A\) particles of type A and \(N_B\) particles of type B under periodic boundary conditions. The total number density is fixed at \(\rho=N/V\) with the total number of particles \(N = N_A + N_B\) and a system volume \(V\). The models studied here, are the well-known models of glass-forming liquids: the binary Kob-Andersen Lennard-Jones (KALJ) liquids and the corresponding WCA version (KAWCA) and a network-forming (NTW) liquid that mimics \(SiO_2\) with short-range spherical potentials. The molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been carried out using the LAMMPS package. For all state points, three to five independent samples with run lengths \(>\) 100\(\tau\) (\(\tau\) is the \(\alpha\)-relaxation time) are analyzed.
## KALJ and KAWCA: binary mixture of Kob Andersen Lennard-Jones particles and corresponding WCA version
The most frequently studied model for glass forming liquids is Kob-Andersen model which is a binary mixture (80:20) of Lennard-Jones (LJ) particles. The interatomic pair potential between species \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\), with \({ \alpha,\beta}= A,B\), \(U_{\alpha\beta}(r)\) is described by a shifted and truncated Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential, as given by: \[U_{\alpha\beta}(r)= \begin{cases} U_{\alpha\beta}^{(LJ)}(r;\sigma_{\alpha\beta},\epsilon_{\alpha\beta})-U_{\alpha\beta}^{(LJ)}(r^{(c)}_{\alpha\beta};\sigma_{\alpha\beta},\epsilon_{\alpha\beta}), & r\leq r^{(c)}_{\alpha\beta}\\ 0, & r> r^{(c)}_{\alpha\beta} \end{cases} \label{LJ_pot}\] where \(U_{\alpha\beta}^{(LJ)}(r;\sigma_{\alpha\beta},\epsilon_{\alpha\beta})=4\epsilon_{\alpha\beta}[({\sigma_{\alpha\beta}}/{r})^{12}-({\sigma_{\alpha\beta}}/{r})^{6}]\) and \(r^{(c)}_{\alpha\beta}=2.5\sigma_{\alpha\beta}\) for the LJ systems (KALJ) and \(r^{(c)}_{\alpha\beta}\) is equal to the position of the minimum of \(U_{\alpha\beta}^{(LJ)}\) for the WCA systems (KAWCA). Length, temperature and time are given in units of \(\sigma_{AA}\), \({k_{B}T}/{\epsilon_{AA}}\) and \(\tau = \surd({m_A\sigma_{AA}^2}/{\epsilon_{AA}})\), respectively. Here we have simulated Kob Andersen Model with the interaction parameters \(\sigma_{AA}\) = 1.0, \(\sigma_{AB}\) =0.8 ,\(\sigma_{BB}\) =0.88, \(\epsilon_{AA}\) =1, \(\epsilon_{AB}\) =1.5, \(\epsilon_{BB}\) =0.5, \(m_{A}\) = \(m_B\)=1.0. We have performed MD simulations in the canonical ensemble (NVT) using Nosé-Hoover thermostat with integration timestep 0.005\(\tau\). The time constants for Nosé-Hoover thermostat are taken to be 100 time steps. The sample is kept in a cubic box with periodic boundary condition. System size is \(N = 500\), \(N_A = 400\) (N \(=\) total number of particles, \(N_A\) \(=\) number of particles of type A) and we have studied a broad range of density \(\rho\) from 1.2 to 1.6 with different temperature ranges given in Table [1](#temp-ref){reference-type="ref" reference="temp-ref"}.
## NTW: tetrahedral network-forming liquids
We study a model of network-forming liquids interacting via spherical short-ranged potentials. This model is simple model and mimics \(SiO_2\) glasses, in which tetrahedral networks strongly dominate the dynamics. The interaction potentials are given as \[U_{\alpha\beta}(r)=\epsilon_{\alpha\beta}[(\frac{\sigma_{\alpha\beta}}{r})^{12}-(1-\delta_{\alpha\beta})(\frac{\sigma_{\alpha\beta}}{r})^6].\] Here \(\delta_{\alpha\beta}\) is the Kronecker delta function. The interaction is truncated and shifted at \(r=2.5\sigma_{\alpha\beta}\). The size, mass, and energy ratios are given as \(\sigma_{AB}/\sigma_{AA}=0.49, \sigma_{BB}/\sigma_{AA}=0.85, m_B/m_A=0.57, \epsilon_{AB}/\epsilon_{AA}=24, \epsilon_{BB}/\epsilon_{AA}=1\). System size is \(N = 500\), \(N_A = 165\) (N \(=\) total number of particles, \(N_A\) \(=\) number of particles of type A). The number density of NTW mixtures is \(\rho = 1.655\). These parameters are adjusted to reproduce the radial distribution functions of the \(SiO_2\) amorphous states which corresponds to the density \(\rho = 2.37g\AA{}^{-3}\) of the so-called van Beest-Kramer-van Santen (BKS) model for the silica glass.
To calculate the integral in the above equation, we use a standard technique used for supercooled liquid. We fit the temperature dependence of the potential energy using the functional form, \(U=a+bT^c\), where \(a,b,c\) are the fitting parameters. The low temperature trajectories have been averaged over \(500\tau\) (where \(\tau\) is the relaxation time defined in Sec 3A).
# Results
In case of simple liquids at the high temperatures, the dimensionless scaled relaxation time (\(\tau^*\)) follows the Rosenfeld relation which is given by, \[\tau^* =C \exp (-K S_{ex}),\] where, \(C\), \(K\) are the fitting parameters and \(S_{ex}\) is the excess entropy. The scaled relaxation time \(\tau^*\) can be written as \(\tau^*=\tau \rho^{-1/3}(k_B T/m)^{-1/2}\), where \(m\) is the mass of the particle. Note that, for NTW model we have used the mass as \(m=\sum_i x_i m_i\), where \(x_i\) is the mole fraction of the i-th particle. We plot the Rosenfeld behavior both for LJ and WCA systems at different densities and for the NTW model at \(\rho=1.655\) (Fig [\[scale_tau_vs_Sex\]](#scale_tau_vs_Sex){reference-type="ref" reference="scale_tau_vs_Sex"}). We find that the relationship is valid at high temperature regime. Interestingly all the systems show a master plot at high temperature and the Rosenfeld exponent (\(K\)) is close to \(0.8\). Note that earlier studies have reported that the Rosenfeld scaling is valid at high temperature both for LJ and WCA systems with the same value of the exponent \(K\). However the density range studied here is much higher, thus, predicting that the Rosenfeld relationship is valid over a wider range of densities. Our study also shows that although at low temperatures the WCA system does not follow any density-temperature scaling, at high temperatures it shows a master plot. The NTW model on the other hand, although is a model of a simple liquid, is known to show characteristics of ionic melts, to be specific the \(SiO_2\) system. However the value of the Rosenfeld scaling exponent (\(K\)) for NTW model is similar to that of the simple liquids and different from that reported for \(SiO_2\). Our next observation is that in the low temperature regime although the LJ and WCA systems show a breakdown of the scaling law, the NTW model follows the scaling law with higher value of the exponent (inset of Fig [\[scale_tau_vs_Sex\]](#scale_tau_vs_Sex){reference-type="ref" reference="scale_tau_vs_Sex"}). This behavior of the NTW model is similar to that reported for the ionic melts. Thus, our study reveals that although the NTW model follows the Rosenfeld behaviour up to a much lower temperature like other network forming liquids, its Rosenfeld exponent is similar to that found for simple liquids (\(K\sim0.8\)). Therefore, the NTW model appears to have mixed characteristics of network forming liquids and simple liquids. As mentioned in the introduction, the pair entropy \(S_2\) provides \(80\%-90\%\) contribution to the excess entropy [@Baranyai-cp; @murari_charu_2010_jcp; @unravel] and thus, the Rosenfeld relationship can be written in terms of \(S_2\) which is given by, \[\tau^* =C_1 \exp (-K_1 S_{2}),\] where, \(C_1\), \(K_1\) are the fitting parameters and \(S_{2}\) is the pair entropy and this scaling behavior is known as Dzugutov scaling law. In Fig [\[scale_tau_vs_S2\]](#scale_tau_vs_S2){reference-type="ref" reference="scale_tau_vs_S2"} we plot the Dzugutov scaling behavior and similar to the Rosenfeld relationship we find it to be valid at high temperature regime. The value of the exponent \(K_1 \sim 0.8\), this indicates that both the Rosenfeld and Dzugutov scaling follows an universal exponent. We also find that similar to the Rosenfeld relation, the Dzugutov scaling behavior is valid for NTW model upto a much lower temperature (inset of Fig [\[scale_tau_vs_S2\]](#scale_tau_vs_S2){reference-type="ref" reference="scale_tau_vs_S2"}) with a higher value of exponent. Next we explore the origin of validity of the Rosenfeld scaling for the network forming liquid even in the lower temperature regime. For any system at high temperatures, the temperature dependence of the relaxation time can be expressed in terms of Arrhenius law which is given by, \[\tau = \tau_0 \exp (E/T), \label{arh}\] where, E is the activation energy. Note that the ionic melts and NTW model are strong liquids which follow Arrhenius behaviour even in the lower temperature regime. In Fig [\[NTW-tau-rosen-linear\]](#NTW-tau-rosen-linear){reference-type="ref" reference="NTW-tau-rosen-linear"}a we plot the relaxation time for NTW model and find that both the high temperature and low temperature regimes can be fitted to two independent straight lines with the activation energies \(E (high)=1.50\) and \(E (low)=5.83\), respectively. The Rosenfeld scaling law can also be written in terms of unscaled relaxation time given by, \[\begin{aligned}
\tau = C^\prime \exp (-K^\prime S_{ex}). \label{rosenfeld-unscaled} \end{aligned}\] We plot the \(\tau\) vs \(-S_{ex}\) in Fig [\[NTW-tau-rosen-linear\]](#NTW-tau-rosen-linear){reference-type="ref" reference="NTW-tau-rosen-linear"}b and find that the Rosenfeld behavior is valid up to a low temperature regime with different values of the exponent which are given in Table [2](#parameters){reference-type="ref" reference="parameters"}. Note that the break in the Rosenfeld behaviour happens exactly at the same position where the break in the Arrhenius behavior is observed. Thus, these two plots show qualitatively similar behavior.
[\[parameters\]]{#parameters label="parameters"}
Now to establish a quantitative connection between the Arrhenius and the Rosenfeld relations, we equate Eq [\[arh\]](#arh){reference-type="ref" reference="arh"} and Eq [\[rosenfeld-unscaled\]](#rosenfeld-unscaled){reference-type="ref" reference="rosenfeld-unscaled"} and can write it as, \[\frac{E}{T}\sim-K^\prime S_{ex}. \label{equality}\] The above equation suggests that for strong liquids where E is independent of temperature if \(S_{ex} \propto 1/T\), the activation energy (E) is proportional to the Rosenfeld exponent (\(K^\prime\)). Next we show, that for NTW model the \(S_{ex}\) vs. \(1/T\) plot indeed shows a linear behavior (Fig [\[NTW-tau-rosen-linear\]](#NTW-tau-rosen-linear){reference-type="ref" reference="NTW-tau-rosen-linear"}c) for the whole temperature range. Thus, from Eq [\[equality\]](#equality){reference-type="ref" reference="equality"} we expect that \[\frac{E (low)}{E (high)} \sim \frac{K^\prime(low)}{K^\prime(high)}.\] We calculate the ratio of the activation energies and find that \(\frac{E (low)}{E (high)}=3.89\) which is close to the value of \(\frac{K^\prime(low)}{K^\prime(high)}=3.60\). Note that for most of the systems both the Rosenfeld relationship and the Arrhenius behaviour are known to be valid only in the high temperature regime. For the fragile systems, in the low temperature regime, the activation energy becomes temperature dependent and there is a breakdown of the Arrhenius behaviour. However, strong liquids like the NTW model follows an Arrhenius temperature dependence even in the low temperature regime (Fig [\[NTW-tau-rosen-linear\]](#NTW-tau-rosen-linear){reference-type="ref" reference="NTW-tau-rosen-linear"}a) and also follows the Rosenfeld scaling (Fig [\[NTW-tau-rosen-linear\]](#NTW-tau-rosen-linear){reference-type="ref" reference="NTW-tau-rosen-linear"}b). Thus we may conclude that the breakdown of the Rosenfeld relationship is connected to the temperature dependence of the activation energy, E. Next we explore the role of residual multi particle entropy (RMPE) in the dynamics. In Fig [\[scale_tau_vs_RMPE\]](#scale_tau_vs_RMPE){reference-type="ref" reference="scale_tau_vs_RMPE"} we plot the scaled relaxation time with RMPE, \(\Delta S\). Similar to that found earlier, for all the systems, there is initially a positive correlation between the relaxation time and \(\Delta S\) and as the temperature is lowered the correlation becomes negative. This role reversal of RMPE has been observed earlier where we have reported that the small positive value of RMPE speeds up the relaxation time. Although at moderately high temperatures, the data show a master plot, at low temperature the dependence of relaxation time on RMPE becomes system dependent. Similar observation is made in Fig [\[scale_tau_vs_S2\]](#scale_tau_vs_S2){reference-type="ref" reference="scale_tau_vs_S2"} where \(\tau^*\) vs. \(S_2\) also shows a deviation at low temperature. Note that these systems cover a wide range of fragility where the LJ system and WCA at high density are the most fragile systems and NTW model is the least fragile one (strongest). Thus, the \(S_2\) and \(\Delta S\) dependence of the scaled relaxation time \(\tau^*\) show a variation with fragility. It appears that for the strong liquid, there is a weaker dependence of \(\tau^*\) on \(S_2\) and \(\Delta S\). To understand this, in Fig [\[S2_vs_RMPE\]](#S2_vs_RMPE){reference-type="ref" reference="S2_vs_RMPE"} we plot \(\Delta S\) with pair entropy for all the systems and find a data collapse. The plot shows that at high temperatures, there is a positive correlation of \(S_2\) and RMPE up to a point where \(S_2=-2.5K_B\). Below \(S_2=-2.5 K_B\), \(S_2\) decreases with increasing \(\Delta S\) and the rate of the negative correlation is independent of fragility. Since the \(S_2\) and the \(\Delta S\) act in opposite directions, their combined effect which is seen in the \(S_{ex}\) and thus in the relaxation time is much weaker. This is precisely the reason behind the spread observed in Fig [\[scale_tau_vs_S2\]](#scale_tau_vs_S2){reference-type="ref" reference="scale_tau_vs_S2"} and Fig [\[scale_tau_vs_RMPE\]](#scale_tau_vs_RMPE){reference-type="ref" reference="scale_tau_vs_RMPE"}. Note that \(\tau^*\) vs. \(S_{ex}\) plot shows a less spread with fragility (Fig [\[scale_tau_vs_Sex\]](#scale_tau_vs_Sex){reference-type="ref" reference="scale_tau_vs_Sex"}).
# Conclusion
In this present work we find that both the Rosenfeld and Dzugutov scaling laws are valid at the high temperature regime for LJ and WCA systems (\(\rho=1.2-1.6\)) and for the NTW model (\(\rho=1.655\)). Interestingly, for all the systems the exponents of both the scaling laws are universal at high temperatures and different from the value predicted for the ionic melts. For the LJ and the WCA systems both the scaling laws break down in the low temperature regime. However, we show that like other network forming liquids (ionic melts), the scaling laws for the NTW model are valid even in the lower temperature regime. Thus, although in terms of validity of these semi-empirical relationships, the NTW model behaves like other network forming liquids, the value of the exponent appears to be similar to that found for the other simple liquids. Our study establishes that the Rosenfeld and the Arrhenius relations are correlated both qualitatively and quantitatively. Thus, for the NTW model, the validity of the Rosenfeld relationship at lower temperatures can be connected to it being a strong liquid following Arrhenius behaviour in this regime. We also study the independent role of pair entropy and residual multiparticle entropy on the dynamics for the systems with different fragilities. Our study reveals that for stronger liquids the dynamics has a weaker dependence on the \(S_2\) and \(\Delta S\). This weaker dependence can be traced back to the fact that the effect of \(S_2\) and \(\Delta S\) on the dynamics act in the opposite directions with a similar rate. | {'timestamp': '2017-06-07T02:05:37', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01715', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01715'} |
null | null |
null | null |
null | null |
# Introduction {#sec:intro}
The ATLAS and CMS collaborations have observed the Higgs boson . The measurements of the Higgs boson couplings to the standard model (SM) particles are essential tests of the SM. The Higgs boson couplings to the weak bosons, \(HZZ\) and \(HWW\), can be measured by studying the production cross sections times branching fractions , by studying the angular distribution in the decay processes \(H\to ZZ^*_{} \to 4l\) and \(H\to WW^*_{} \to l\nu l\nu\) and by studying kinematics of the production processes for instance the jet azimuthal angle correlation in the weak boson fusion production . The ATLAS and CMS collaborations have already performed measurements of \(HZZ\) and \(HWW\) interactions by using the above three approaches in refs. , in refs. and in refs. , respectively. The production processes \(pp \to ZH\) and \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\) provide direct access to the \(HZZ\) and \(HWW\) couplings, respectively. In these processes, not only the three approaches mentioned above, but also decay properties of the \(Z\) and \(W\) bosons can be used to study the \(HZZ\) and \(HWW\) interactions .\
An arbitrary polarised state of a massive particle with spin \(s\) is entirely described by a \((2s+1) \times (2s+1)\) polarisation density matrix; see e.g. refs. . When a particle with spin 1 is in an either completely or partially polarised state, it has 9 independent angular distributions of its decay products at its rest frame and the coefficients of these distributions are written in terms of all the elements of the polarisation density matrix; see e.g. refs. . An experimental determination of the complete decay angular distributions of a particle's decay products is, therefore, identical to an attempt to determine the polarisation density matrix, from which detailed information in reactions which produce that particle can be extracted; see e.g. ref. for a theoretical study and e.g. refs. for experimental studies [^1].\
As the \(Z\) boson in the process \(e^+_{}e^-_{} \to ZH\) can be in a polarised state , so the \(Z\) boson in the process \(pp \to ZH\) can be. The \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\) in the process \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\) can be also in polarised states. It would be, therefore, possible to study \(HZZ\), \(HZ\gamma\) and \(HWW\) interactions in detail from a careful analysis of these states of polarisation. As we mentioned in the previous paragraph, the polarisation density matrix of the \(Z\) (\(W\)) boson contains the complete information about a state of polarisation of the \(Z\) (\(W\)) boson. Hence all of the elements of the polarisation density matrix should be made use of in such a careful analysis. In this paper, we present a systematic approach to analyse the polarisation density matrices of the \(Z\) boson and \(W^{\pm}_{}\) in the processes \(pp \to ZH\) and \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\). With the aim of making maximum use of the information about states of polarisation, we relate all of the elements of the polarisation density matrices with observables which we can measure at the environment of proton-proton (\(pp\)) collisions. We discuss consequences of non-standard \(HZZ\), \(HZ\gamma\) and \(HWW\) interactions for these observables. A detailed analysis of the polarisation of the \(Z\) boson in the process \(e^+_{}e^-_{} \to ZH\) is present in ref. . Our approach in the process \(pp \to ZH\) is an extension of that work to \(pp\) collisions.\
The paper is organised as follows. In Section [2](#sec:helicityamp){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:helicityamp"}, we introduce all the ingredients needed for our analyses in the following sections. At first, we give non-standard \(HZZ\), \(HZ\gamma\) and \(HWW\) couplings. We present the complete helicity amplitudes for the sub-processes \(q\bar{q}\to ZH\), \(u\bar{d}\to W^+_{}H\) and \(d\bar{u}\to W^-_{}H\). These amplitudes are given for the non-standard couplings. We derive the relations between the helicity amplitudes imposed by the CP and \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) symmetries. In Section [3](#sec:densitymatrix){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:densitymatrix"}, we analyse the polarisation density matrices of the \(Z\) boson in the process \(pp \to ZH\) in detail. First of all, we define the polarisation density matrices consisting of the helicity amplitudes of the previous section. Then we derive the 4 different differential cross sections for the process \(pp \to ZH\) followed by \(Z \to f\bar{f}\) with respect to the \(Z\) decay angles. Among the \(36\) coefficients (\(=9 \times 4\)) of these 4 different differential angular distributions, only \(15\) coefficients can be non-zero. These coefficients are written in terms of the elements of the polarisation density matrices. The restrictions on these coefficients imposed by the CP and \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) symmetries are clarified. We focus on the coefficients which are strictly zero in the SM due to CP invariance or small in the SM due to the smallness of re-scattering effects, and study the influences of the non-standard \(HZZ\) and \(HZ\gamma\) couplings. In Section [4](#sec:polWboson){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:polWboson"}, we analyse the polarisation density matrices of the \(W^{+}_{}\) and \(W^{-}_{}\) in the process \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\) following the same procedure as the previous section. Section [5](#sec:summary){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:summary"} gives a summary.
# Constituents of the polarisation density matrices {#sec:helicityamp}
As the base vectors for the density matrices [^2], we choose the eigenfunctions of the helicity operator. The density matrices are, therefore, constructed of helicity amplitudes. In this section we derive the complete helicity amplitudes for the sub-processes \(q\bar{q}\to ZH\), \(u\bar{d}\to W^+_{}H\) and \(d\bar{u}\to W^-_{}H\).
## Effective Lagrangian with CP-odd operators
We derive non-standard \(HZZ\), \(HZ\gamma\) and \(HWW\) couplings from the following effective Lagrangian : \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal L}_{\mathrm{eff}}^{} = \bigl( 1 + a_Z^{} ) \frac{1}{2} g_Z^{}m_Z^{} HZ_{\mu}^{}Z^{\mu}_{} + \frac{g_Z^{}}{2 m_Z^{}} \sum_{V=Z,\gamma}^{} \Bigl\{ b_V^{} HZ_{\mu\nu}^{} V^{\mu\nu}_{} + c_V^{} \bigl[ (\partial^{\mu}_{}H) Z^{\nu}_{}-(\partial^{\nu}_{}H) Z^{\mu}_{} \bigr] V_{\mu\nu}^{} \nonumber \\ + \frac{1}{2}\widetilde{b}_V^{} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}_{} H Z_{\mu\nu}^{} V_{\rho\sigma}^{} \Bigr\} \nonumber \\ + \bigl( 1 + a_W^{} ) g m_W^{} HW^{\dagger}_{\mu}W^{\mu}_{} + \frac{g}{m_W^{}} \Bigl\{ b_W^{} HW_{\mu\nu}^{\dagger} W^{\mu\nu}_{} + c_W^{} \bigl[ (\partial_{\mu}^{}H) W_{\nu}^{\dagger} W^{\mu\nu}_{}-(\partial^{\nu}_{}H) W^{\mu}_{} W_{\mu\nu}^{\dagger} \bigr] \nonumber \\ + \frac{1}{2}\widetilde{b}_W^{} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}_{} H W_{\mu\nu}^{\dagger} W_{\rho\sigma}^{} \Bigr\}, \label{eq:lagrangian} \end{aligned}\] where \(V_{\mu\nu}^{} = \partial_{\mu}^{} V_{\nu}^{}-\partial_{\nu}^{} V_{\mu}^{}\), \(W_{\mu\nu}^{} = \partial_{\mu}^{} W_{\nu}^{}-\partial_{\nu}^{} W_{\mu}^{}\), \(W^{\mu}_{}\) is the \(W^-_{}\) field, \(g=e/\sin{\theta_w^{}}\), \(g_Z^{}=g/\cos{\theta_w^{}}\) with \(\theta_w^{}\) being the electroweak mixing angle and \(e\) being the proton charge, and \(\epsilon_{0123}^{}=+1\) in our convention. All of the eleven coefficients \(a_Z^{}\), \(a_W^{}\), \(b_V^{}\), \(c_V^{}\) and \(\widetilde{b}_V^{}\) (\(V=Z,\gamma,W\)) are real so that \({\cal L}_{\mathrm{eff}}^{} = {\cal L}_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\dagger}\) and zero at the tree level in the SM. The operators whose coefficients are \(a_Z^{}\), \(a_W^{}\), \(b_V^{}\) and \(c_V^{}\) (\(V=Z,\gamma,W\)) are CP-even and the operators whose coefficients are \(\widetilde{b}_V^{}\) (\(V=Z,\gamma,W\)) are CP-odd. The Lagrangian with only the CP-even operators indicates that \(H\) is a CP-even scalar field, while the Lagrangian with only the CP-odd operators indicates that \(H\) is a CP-odd scalar field. In both cases, the theory is CP invariant. If both the CP-even operator(s) and the CP-odd operator(s) exist, \(H\) is no longer a CP eigenstate and the theory is not CP invariant. We call \(a_Z^{}\), \(a_W^{}\), \(b_V^{}\) and \(c_V^{}\) (\(V=Z,\gamma,W\)) CP-even coefficients and \(\widetilde{b}_V^{}\) (\(V=Z,\gamma,W\)) CP-odd coefficients.\
If we assign the momenta as shown in Figure [\[figure:vertex\]](#figure:vertex){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:vertex"} [^3], Feynman rules for the \(HZV\) (\(V=Z,\gamma\)) vertex and the \(HWW\) vertex can be expressed as
where \(\delta_{ZV}^{}=1\) for \(V=Z\), \(\delta_{ZV}^{}=0\) for \(V=\gamma\), and \(\hat{s}=(p)^2_{}\). Terms proportional to \(k^{\nu}_{}\) vanish for the on-shell \(Z\) boson and the on-shell \(W\) boson, and terms proportional to \(p^{\mu}_{}\) also vanish in our processes where the intermediate off-shell vector boson (\(Z\), \(\gamma\) or \(W\)) couples to the four-vector consisting of the two massless quarks. These terms are, therefore, not included in the above formulae. All the form factors are constant and expressed in terms of the coefficients in the effective Lagrangian in eq. ([\[eq:lagrangian\]](#eq:lagrangian){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:lagrangian"}): \[\begin{aligned}
h_1^Z & = a_Z^{}+b_Z^{}-(b_Z^{}-c_Z^{}) \frac{m_H^2}{m_Z^2}, & h_1^{\gamma} & = \frac{1}{2} (b_{\gamma}^{}-c_{\gamma}^{}) \frac{m_Z^2-m_H^2}{m_Z^2}, & h_1^W & = a_W^{}+b_W^{}-(b_W^{}-c_W^{}) \frac{m_H^2}{m_W^2}, \nonumber \\ h_2^Z & = b_Z^{}, & h_2^{\gamma} & = \frac{1}{2} ( b_{\gamma}^{} + c_{\gamma}^{} ), & h_2^W & = b_W^{}, \nonumber \\ h_3^Z & =-2(b_Z^{}-c_Z^{}), & h_3^{\gamma} & =-(b_{\gamma}^{}-c_{\gamma}^{}), & h_3^W & =-2(b_W^{}-c_W^{}), \nonumber \\ \widetilde{h}_4^Z & =-2 \widetilde{b}_Z^{}, & \widetilde{h}_4^{\gamma} & =-\widetilde{b}_{\gamma}^{}, & \widetilde{h}_4^W & =-2 \widetilde{b}_W^{}. \end{aligned}\] The form factors \(h_i^V\) \((V=Z, \gamma, W)\) \((i=1,2,3)\) consist of the CP-even coefficients and \(\widetilde{h}_4^V\) \((V=Z, \gamma, W)\) consist of the CP-odd coefficients. We call \(h_i^V\) \((V=Z, \gamma, W)\) \((i=1,2,3)\) CP-even form factors and \(\widetilde{h}_4^V\) \((V=Z, \gamma, W)\) CP-odd form factors.
## Helicity amplitudes {#sec:helamp}
Feynman diagrams for the sub-processes \(q\bar{q}\to ZH\), \(u\bar{d}\to W^+_{}H\) and \(d\bar{u}\to W^-_{}H\) are shown in Figure [\[figure:diagrams\]](#figure:diagrams){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:diagrams"}. The circles denote the non-standard couplings derived in the previous section. We evaluate production helicity amplitudes in the following two frames. Let us assume that a direction of the \(z\)-axis is fixed along \(pp\) collisions. In one frame, which we call the \(q\overline{q^{(\prime)}_{}}\) centre-of-mass (c.m.) frame and is shown in the left picture of Figure [\[figure:frames\]](#figure:frames){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:frames"}, the quark (\(q\)) moves along the positive direction of the \(z\)-axis. In another frame, which we call the \(\overline{q^{(\prime)}_{}}q\) c.m. frame and is shown in the right picture of Figure [\[figure:frames\]](#figure:frames){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:frames"}, the antiquark (\(\overline{q^{(\prime)}_{}}\)) moves along the positive direction of the \(z\)-axis. In Figure [\[figure:frames\]](#figure:frames){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:frames"}, our notation for helicities and the polar angle \(\theta\) are also shown. We neglect the masses of \(q\) and \(\overline{q^{(\prime)}_{}}\), thus the helicity of \(\overline{q^{(\prime)}_{}}\) is always opposite to that of \(q\) in our sub-processes. Helicity amplitudes are, therefore, given for the quark helicity \(\sigma(=\pm1)\) and the weak boson helicity \(\lambda(=\pm1,0)\); the antiquark helicity is automatically fixed to \(-\sigma\) [^4]. We denote the helicity amplitudes evaluated in the \(q\overline{q^{(\prime)}_{}}\) c.m. frame by \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(q \overline{q^{(\prime)}_{}})\) and those evaluated in the \(\overline{q^{(\prime)}_{}}q\) c.m. frame by \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(\overline{q^{(\prime)}_{}}q)\). It should be emphasised that \(\sigma\) always denotes the helicity of the quark and \(\theta\) is the polar angle of the weak boson from the \(z\)-axis (not the quark momentum direction). The helicity amplitudes \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(q \bar{q})\) for the sub-process \(q\bar{q}\to ZH\) are
where \[\begin{aligned}
\hat{M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda=\pm} & = g_Z^{} m_Z^{} \sqrt{\hat{s}} \Biggl[ \frac{g_{Z \sigma}^{}}{\hat{s}-m_Z^2} \biggl( 1+ h_1^Z + h_2^Z \frac{\hat{s}}{m_Z^2} + i \lambda \widetilde{h}_4^Z \frac{k\sqrt{\hat{s}}}{m_Z^2} \biggr) + \frac{Q_q^{}e}{\hat{s}} \biggl( h_1^{\gamma} + h_2^{\gamma} \frac{\hat{s}}{m_Z^2} + i \lambda \widetilde{h}_4^{\gamma} \frac{k\sqrt{\hat{s}}}{m_Z^2} \biggr) \Biggr], \nonumber \\ \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda=0} & =-g_Z^{} w \sqrt{\hat{s}} \Biggl[ \frac{g_{Z \sigma}^{}}{\hat{s}-m_Z^2} \biggl( 1+h_1^Z + h_2^Z \frac{\hat{s}}{m_Z^2} + h_3^Z \frac{k^2_{}\sqrt{\hat{s}}}{m_Z^2w} \biggr) + \frac{Q_q^{}e}{\hat{s}} \biggl( h_1^{\gamma} + h_2^{\gamma} \frac{\hat{s}}{m_Z^2} + h_3^{\gamma} \frac{k^2_{}\sqrt{\hat{s}}}{m_Z^2w} \biggr) \Biggr]. \label{eq:Zsubamplitudes} \end{aligned}\] Here \(\sqrt{\hat{s}}\) is the \(q\bar{q}\) c.m. energy, \(w\) is the energy of the \(Z\) boson: \(w = (\hat{s}+m_Z^2-m_H^2)/(2\sqrt{\hat{s}})\), \(k\) is the momentum of the \(Z\) boson: \(k=\sqrt{w^2_{}-m_Z^2}\), \(Q_q^{}\) is the electric charge of the quark in units of \(e\), \(g_{Z+}^{} = g_Z^{} (-Q_q^{} \sin^2_{}{\theta_w^{}})\), and \(g_{Z-}^{} = g_Z^{} (T_q^3-Q_q^{} \sin^2_{}{\theta_w^{}})\) where \(T_u^3=1/2\) and \(T_d^3=-1/2\).\
Although the actual calculation of the helicity amplitudes \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(\bar{q}q)\) is easy, it is also possible to estimate them from \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(q\bar{q})\) as follows. If we denote the helicity of \(\bar{q}\) by \(\sigma\) and the helicity of \(q\) by \(-\sigma\) (this is opposite to our helicity notation), the angular part is the same as \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(q\bar{q})\) and the amplitudes are given by
where the helicity of each particle is explicitly shown in parenthesis. Because the helicity of a quark is equal to its chirality and the helicity of an antiquark is opposite to its chirality in the massless limit, \(q\) with helicity \(-\sigma\) has the chirality \(-\sigma\). Hence the coupling \(g_{Z \sigma}^{}\) must be replaced by \(g_{Z-\sigma}^{}\) in eq. ([\[eq:Zsubamplitudes\]](#eq:Zsubamplitudes){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Zsubamplitudes"}), and this replacement is expressed by \(\hat{M}_{-\sigma}^{\lambda}\) in eq. ([\[eq:ZampAll2-temp\]](#eq:ZampAll2-temp){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ZampAll2-temp"}). By the simple replacement \(\sigma \to-\sigma\) in eq. ([\[eq:ZampAll2-temp\]](#eq:ZampAll2-temp){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ZampAll2-temp"}), we obtain the helicity amplitudes \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(\bar{q}q)\) in our helicity notation:
We note that the relative sign among the amplitudes in eq. ([\[eq:ZampAll1\]](#eq:ZampAll1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ZampAll1"}) and that among the amplitudes in eq. ([\[eq:ZampAll2\]](#eq:ZampAll2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ZampAll2"}) are important, because they appear in the off-diagonal elements of the density matrices.\
Similarly, the helicity amplitudes for the sub-process \(u\bar{d}\to W^+_{}H\) are given by
and those for the sub-process \(d\bar{u}\to W^-_{}H\) are given by
where \[\begin{aligned}
\hat{N}_{}^{\lambda=\pm} & = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}g^2_{} m_W^{} \sqrt{\hat{s}} \frac{1}{\hat{s}-m_W^2} \biggl( 1 + h_1^W + h_2^W \frac{\hat{s}}{m_W^2} + i \lambda \widetilde{h}_4^W \frac{k\sqrt{\hat{s}}}{m_W^2} \biggr), \nonumber \\ \hat{N}_{}^{\lambda=0} & =-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}g^2_{} w \sqrt{\hat{s}} \frac{1}{\hat{s}-m_W^2} \biggl( 1 + h_1^W + h_2^W \frac{\hat{s}}{m_W^2} + h_3^W \frac{k^2_{}\sqrt{\hat{s}}}{m_W^2 w} \biggr). \label{eq:Wsubamplitudes} \end{aligned}\] Here \(w\) is the energy of the \(W\) boson: \(w = (\hat{s}+m_W^2-m_H^2)/(2\sqrt{\hat{s}})\), \(k\) is the momentum of the \(W\) boson: \(k=\sqrt{w^2_{}-m_W^2}\), and \(V_{ud}^{}\) is the element of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix.\
By looking at the helicity amplitudes, we can already discuss a difference between the \(Z\) boson and the \(W\) boson with regard to states of polarisation. Since the \(W\) boson couples to only a fermion with chirality \(-1\), the initial quark \(u\) or \(d\) always has the helicity \(\sigma=-1\). Therefore, while the \(Z\) boson is in a partially polarised state (often called a mixed state; see e.g. refs. ), the \(W\) boson (both the \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\)) is in a completely polarised state (often called a pure state).
## Requests from symmetries
Conditions imposed by symmetries lead to certain relations between the helicity amplitudes. The upper figures in Figure [\[figure:CP\]](#figure:CP){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:CP"} show the original states in the process \(q\bar{q} \to ZH\) (left), the states after CP transformation (middle) and the states after the rotation around the \(z\)-axis by \(\pi\) (right). From these figures, we find that the invariance under CP leads to the relation \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(q \bar{q}) (\theta) = {\cal M}_{\sigma}^{-\lambda}(q \bar{q}) (\pi-\theta), \label{eq:CPinvZ} \end{aligned}\] where \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(q \bar{q}) (\theta) = {\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(q \bar{q})\) given in eq. ([\[eq:ZampAll1\]](#eq:ZampAll1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ZampAll1"}), and \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{-\lambda}(q \bar{q}) (\pi-\theta)\) is obtained by setting \(\theta \to \pi-\theta\) in \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{-\lambda}(q \bar{q})\). It is easy to see that a non-zero value of the CP-odd form factors \(\widetilde{h}_4^Z\) and/or \(\widetilde{h}_4^{\gamma}\) violates this relation. Similarly, the lower figures in Figure [\[figure:CP\]](#figure:CP){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:CP"} show the original states in the process \(u\bar{d} \to W^+_{}H\) (left), the states after CP transformation (middle) and the states after the rotation around the \(z\)-axis by \(\pi\) (right). From these figures, we find that CP invariance requests the relation \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal M}_{-}^{\lambda}(u \bar{d}) (\theta) = {\cal M}_{-}^{-\lambda}(d \bar{u}) (\pi-\theta), \label{eq:CPinvW} \end{aligned}\] where \({\cal M}_{-}^{\lambda}(u \bar{d}) (\theta) = {\cal M}_{-}^{\lambda}(u \bar{d})\) given in eq. ([\[eq:WpampAll\]](#eq:WpampAll){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:WpampAll"}), and \({\cal M}_{-}^{-\lambda}(d \bar{u}) (\pi-\theta)\) is obtained by setting \(\theta \to \pi-\theta\) in \({\cal M}_{-}^{-\lambda}(d \bar{u})\) given in eq. ([\[eq:WmampAll\]](#eq:WmampAll){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:WmampAll"}). This relation is violated by the imaginary part of the element \(V_{ud}^{}\) of the CKM matrix, even when the CP-odd form factor \(\widetilde{h}_4^W\) is zero. However, this CP violation phase in \(V_{ud}^{}\) is always regarded as an overall common phase among the amplitudes. For instance, the phase in \(V^{}_{ud}\) is an overall common phase among \({\cal M}_{-}^{\lambda=+}(d \bar{u})\), \({\cal M}_{-}^{\lambda=-}(d \bar{u})\) and \({\cal M}_{-}^{\lambda=0}(d \bar{u})\). Therefore, the effect of the CP violation phase in the CKM matrix never appears even in the off-diagonal elements of the density matrices. Only a non-zero value of the CP-odd form factor \(\widetilde{h}_4^W\) violates the relation in eq. ([\[eq:CPinvW\]](#eq:CPinvW){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPinvW"}) *and* affects a state of polarisation of the \(W\) boson. We can write the relations in eqs. ([\[eq:CPinvZ\]](#eq:CPinvZ){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPinvZ"}) and ([\[eq:CPinvW\]](#eq:CPinvW){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPinvW"}) in the following convenient forms, respectively:
CPT invariance *and* the unitarity condition conclude that the following relations hold at the tree level approximation and violation of the relations indicates the existence of re-scattering effects:
It is easy to see that the relations hold if all of the form factors are real. Following ref. , we call the invariance which leads to these relations \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) invariance. We can write the relations in eq. ([\[eq:CPTinv\]](#eq:CPTinv){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPTinv"}) in the following convenient forms, respectively:
# Polarisation of the \(Z\) boson {#sec:densitymatrix}
## Polarisation density matrices of the \(Z\) boson {#sec:derivation}
In this section we define the density matrices of the \(Z\) boson by using our notation of the helicity amplitudes of the previous section. We consider the sub-process \[\begin{aligned}
q(\sigma) + \bar{q}(-\sigma ) & \to Z(\lambda) + H; \nonumber \\ Z(\lambda) & \to f(\tau) + \bar{f}(-\tau), \end{aligned}\] where the helicity of each particle is shown in parenthesis. We neglect the masses of the final fermion \(f\) and the final antifermion \(\bar{f}\), thus the helicity of \(\bar{f}\) is always opposite to that of \(f\). We express the full helicity amplitude as \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal T}_{\sigma}^{\tau}(q\bar{q}) = P_Z^{} \sum_{\lambda=\pm,0}^{} {\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(q \bar{q})\ D_{\lambda}^{\tau},\label{eq:fullampZ} \end{aligned}\] where the production amplitude \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(q \bar{q})\) is given in eq. ([\[eq:ZampAll1\]](#eq:ZampAll1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ZampAll1"}), \(D_{\lambda}^{\tau}\) is the decay helicity amplitude, and \[\begin{aligned}
P_Z^{} = ( Q^2_{}-m_Z^2 + i m_Z^{} \Gamma_Z^{} )^{-1}_{} \end{aligned}\] denotes the propagator factor of the \(Z\) boson. We evaluate the decay amplitude in the following four-momentum frame: \[\begin{aligned}
Z:&\ \ \bigl( m_Z^{}, 0, 0, 0 \bigr) \nonumber \\ f:&\ \ \frac{m_Z^{}}{2}\bigl( 1,\ \sin{\widehat{\theta}} \cos{\widehat{\phi}},\ \sin{\widehat{\theta}} \sin{\widehat{\phi}},\ \cos{\widehat{\theta}} \bigr) \nonumber \\ \bar{f} :&\ \ \frac{m_Z^{}}{2}\bigl( 1,\-\sin{\widehat{\theta}} \cos{\widehat{\phi}},\-\sin{\widehat{\theta}} \sin{\widehat{\phi}},\-\cos{\widehat{\theta}} \bigr). \label{eq:decaykinematics} \end{aligned}\] The decay amplitude is \[\begin{aligned}
D_{\lambda}^{\tau} = g_{Zf\bar{f}}^{\tau}\ m_Z^{}\ d_{\lambda}^{\tau}, \end{aligned}\] where
The explicit forms of the coupling \(g_{Zf\bar{f}}^{\tau}\) are, \(g_{Zl\bar{l}}^{+} = g_Z^{} \sin^2_{}{\theta_w^{}}\) and \(g_{Zl\bar{l}}^{-} = g_Z^{} (-1/2+\sin^2_{}{\theta_w^{}} )\) for a charged lepton pair, \(g_{Zu\bar{u}}^{+} = -(2/3)g_Z^{}\sin^2_{}{\theta_w^{}}\) and \(g_{Zu\bar{u}}^{-} = g_Z^{} (1/2-(2/3)\sin^2_{}{\theta_w^{}})\) for a up-type quark pair, \(g_{Zd\bar{d}}^{+} = (1/3)g_Z^{} \sin^2_{}{\theta_w^{}}\) and \(g_{Zd\bar{d}}^{-} = g_Z^{} (-1/2+(1/3)\sin^2_{}{\theta_w^{}})\) for a down-type quark pair. A straightforward manipulation gives \[\begin{aligned}
\sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl| {\cal T}_{\sigma}^{\tau}(q\bar{q}) \bigr|^2_{} & = \bigl|P_Z^{} m_Z^{} g_{Zf\bar{f}}^{\tau} \bigr|^2_{} \sum_{\sigma}^{}\sum_{\lambda^{\prime}_{}, \lambda} \bigl( d_{\lambda^{\prime}}^{\tau} \bigr)^*_{} \rho_{\sigma}^{\lambda^{\prime} \lambda}(q\bar{q}) d_{\lambda}^{\tau} \nonumber \\ & = \bigl|P_Z^{} m_Z^{} g_{Zf\bar{f}}^{\tau} \bigr|^2_{} d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) d_{}^{\tau}, \label{eq:ampsquaredZ} \end{aligned}\] where \[\begin{aligned}
\sum_{\sigma} \rho_{\sigma}^{\lambda^{\prime} \lambda}(q\bar{q}) = \sum_{\sigma} \bigl\{ {\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda^{\prime}_{}}(q \bar{q}) \bigr\}^{\ast}_{} {\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(q \bar{q})\label{eq:densityMqqbarZ} \end{aligned}\] represents the elements of the density matrix in the helicity basis of the \(Z\) boson in the \(q\bar{q}\) c.m. frame, and at the last equality the following \(3\times3\) matrix form is employed: \[\begin{aligned}
\rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} \rho_{\sigma}^{++}(q\bar{q}) & \rho_{\sigma}^{+-}(q\bar{q}) & \rho_{\sigma}^{+0}(q\bar{q}) \\ \rho_{\sigma}^{-+}(q\bar{q}) & \rho_{\sigma}^{--}(q\bar{q}) & \rho_{\sigma}^{-0}(q\bar{q}) \\ \rho_{\sigma}^{0+}(q\bar{q}) & \rho_{\sigma}^{0-}(q\bar{q}) & \rho_{\sigma}^{00}(q\bar{q}) \\ \end{array} \right) ,\ \ \ d^{\tau}_{} = \left( \begin{array}{c} d^{\tau}_{+} \\ d^{\tau}_{-} \\ d^{\tau}_{0} \\ \end{array} \right).\label{eq:matrixform} \end{aligned}\] The density matrix is a \(3\times3\) Hermitian matrix: \(\sum_{\sigma} \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) = ( \sum_{\sigma} \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) )^{\dagger}_{}\) [^5].\
The full helicity amplitude \({\cal T}_{\sigma}^{\tau}(\bar{q}q)\), in which the production amplitude is evaluated in the \(\bar{q}q\) c.m. frame shown in the right picture of Figure [\[figure:frames\]](#figure:frames){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:frames"}, can be treated in the same manner:
where \[\begin{aligned}
\sum_{\sigma} \rho_{\sigma}^{\lambda^{\prime} \lambda}(\bar{q} q) = \sum_{\sigma} \bigl\{ {\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda^{\prime}_{}}(\bar{q} q) \bigr\}^{\ast}_{} {\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(\bar{q} q)\label{eq:densityMqbarqZ} \end{aligned}\] represents the elements of the density matrix in the helicity basis of the \(Z\) boson in the \(\bar{q}q\) c.m. frame. The production amplitude \({\cal M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda}(\bar{q} q)\) is given in eq. ([\[eq:ZampAll2\]](#eq:ZampAll2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ZampAll2"}).
## Decay angular distributions of the polarised \(Z\) boson {#sec:crossZboson}
In terms of the density matrices defined in eqs. ([\[eq:densityMqqbarZ\]](#eq:densityMqqbarZ){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:densityMqqbarZ"}) and ([\[eq:densityMqbarqZ\]](#eq:densityMqbarqZ){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:densityMqbarqZ"}), the complete differential cross section for the process \(pp\to ZH\) followed by \(Z\to f\bar{f}\) in the narrow width approximation can be expressed as follows: \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{s}\ dy\ d\cos{\theta}\ d\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\ d\widehat{\phi} } = & \frac{m_Z^{}k}{ 12288 \pi^3_{} \Gamma_Z^{} s \hat{s}^{\frac{3}{2}}_{}} \sum_f \sum_{\tau} \bigl| g_{Zf\bar{f}}^{\tau} \bigr|^2_{} C_f^{} \nonumber \\ & \times \sum_{q} \biggl[ q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) d_{}^{\tau} + \bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) d_{}^{\tau} \biggr],\label{eq:differentialZH} \end{aligned}\] where \(s\) is the c.m. energy squared of the \(pp\) collisions, \(\hat{s}\) is the c.m. energy squared of the \(q\bar{q}\) collisions, \(y\) is the rapidity of the \(q\bar{q}\) c.m. frame and the \(\bar{q}q\) c.m. frame (see Figure [\[figure:frames\]](#figure:frames){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:frames"}) on the \(pp\) c.m. frame (i.e. the experimental frame), \(C_f^{}\) is an effective colour factor: \(C_f^{}=1\) for \(Z\) decays into a charged lepton pair and \(C_f^{}=3\) for \(Z\) decays into a quark pair, \(q(x_i^{})\) and \(\bar{q}(x_i^{})\) are the quark and antiquark parton distribution functions (PDFs) with energy fraction \(x_i^{}\). Summations are performed over the final fermion flavor \(f\), the helicity \(\tau\) of the final fermion, and the initial quark and antiquark flavor \(q\). Averages are performed over the helicity and colour of the initial quark, and those of the initial antiquark. Recall that \(k\) is the momentum of the \(Z\) boson and \(\theta\) is the polar angle of the \(Z\) boson in the \(q\bar{q}\) c.m. frame and the \(\bar{q}q\) c.m. frame. The decay angles \(\widehat{\theta}\) and \(\widehat{\phi}\) are defined in eq. ([\[eq:decaykinematics\]](#eq:decaykinematics){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:decaykinematics"}). Here \(x_1^{}\) (\(x_2^{}\)) denotes the energy fraction of the initial quark or antiquark in the proton that moves along the positive (negative) direction of the \(z\)-axis, once a direction of the \(z\)-axis is fixed along the \(pp\) collisions. The integration variables \(\hat{s}\) and \(y\) are related to \(x_1^{}\) and \(x_2^{}\): \[\begin{aligned}
\hat{s} = s x_1^{} x_2^{},\ \ \ y = \frac{1}{2}\ln{\frac{x_1^{}}{x_2^{}}}. \end{aligned}\] The allowed region is \[\begin{aligned}
(m_Z^{} + m_H^{})^2_{} < \hat{s} < s, \ \ \-\ln{\sqrt{\frac{s}{\hat{s}}}} < y < \ln{\sqrt{\frac{s}{\hat{s}}}}.\label{eq:allowedregion} \end{aligned}\]\
Now we derive the differential cross sections with respect to \(\hat{s}\), \(\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\) and \(\widehat{\phi}\) by integrating over \(y\) and \(\cos{\theta}\) in eq. ([\[eq:differentialZH\]](#eq:differentialZH){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:differentialZH"}). We consider the 4 different integration approaches summarised in Table [1](#table:integration){reference-type="ref" reference="table:integration"}. In the complete differential cross section of eq. ([\[eq:differentialZH\]](#eq:differentialZH){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:differentialZH"}), the polar angle \(\theta\) dependence appears only in \(\rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q})\) and \(\rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q)\). The \(\cos{\theta}\) integration in the approaches \({\cal A}\) and \({\cal B}\) results in
where \(c_i^{}\) \((i=1,2,3)\) are constant values depending on \(\epsilon\) and summarised in Table [2](#table:coefficients){reference-type="ref" reference="table:coefficients"}, and \(\hat{M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda=\pm,0}\) are defined in eq. ([\[eq:Zsubamplitudes\]](#eq:Zsubamplitudes){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Zsubamplitudes"}). Notice the difference between eq. ([\[eq:densqqbarint1\]](#eq:densqqbarint1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:densqqbarint1"}) and eq. ([\[eq:densqbarqint1\]](#eq:densqbarqint1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:densqbarqint1"}) that there is a minus sign in front of the elements that have the overall \(\sigma\) in eq. ([\[eq:densqbarqint1\]](#eq:densqbarqint1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:densqbarqint1"}). This result is actually obvious from the comparison between the amplitudes in eq. ([\[eq:ZampAll1\]](#eq:ZampAll1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ZampAll1"}) and those in eq. ([\[eq:ZampAll2\]](#eq:ZampAll2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ZampAll2"}). After integration over \(y\) and \(\cos{\theta}\) in the approach \({\cal A}\), the differential cross section can be expressed as \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{s}\ d\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\ d\widehat{\phi} }\biggr|_{{\cal A}}^{} & = {\cal T} \int_{-y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}}^{y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}} dy \biggl[ q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} + \bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} \biggr] \nonumber \\ & = {\cal T} \underbrace{\int_{0}^{y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}}}_{x_1^{}>x_2^{}} dy \biggl[ \underbrace{q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{})}_{A}\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} + \underbrace{\bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{})}_{B}\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} \biggr] \nonumber \\ & + {\cal T} \underbrace{\int^{0}_{-y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}}}_{x_2^{}>x_1^{}} dy \biggl[ \underbrace{\bar{q}(x_2^{}) q(x_1^{})}_B \ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} + \underbrace{q(x_2^{}) \bar{q}(x_1^{})}_{A}\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} \biggr] \nonumber \\ = {\cal T} \int_{0}^{y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}} & dy\ 2 \Bigl[ q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{}) + \bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{}) \Bigr] d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \left( \begin{array}{ccc} c_1^{} \bigl| \hat{M}_{\sigma}^+ \bigr|^2_{} & \frac{1}{2} c_2^{} \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} & 0 \\ \frac{1}{2} c_2^{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigr)^*_{} & c_1^{} \bigl| \hat{M}_{\sigma}^-\bigr|^2_{} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & c_2^{} \bigl| \hat{M}_{\sigma}^0 \bigr|^2_{} \\ \end{array} \right) d_{}^{\tau} ,\label{eq:PartdifferentialZH1} \end{aligned}\] where \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal T} =\frac{m_Z^{}k}{ 12288 \pi^3_{} \Gamma_Z^{} s \hat{s}^{\frac{3}{2}}_{}} \sum_f \sum_{\tau} \bigl| g_{Zf\bar{f}}^{\tau} \bigr|^2_{} C_f^{} \sum_q \label{eq:simplywriting} \end{aligned}\] is introduced to simplify our writing. The PDFs labelled \(A\) in the second equality (i.e. \(q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{})\) and \(q(x_2^{}) \bar{q}(x_1^{})\)) give the same numerical contribution after integration over \(y\), therefore they are combined in the third (i.e. last) equality. The same is done for the PDFs labelled \(B\). In the last equality, \(\bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle\) and \(\bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle\) are added, and the elements that have the overall \(\sigma\) vanish due to the sign difference in \(\bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle\) and \(\bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle\). The vanished elements in the approach \({\cal A}\) in eq. ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH1\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH1"}) revive by performing integration in the approach \({\cal B}\): \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{s}\ d\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\ d\widehat{\phi} }\biggr|_{{\cal B}}^{} & = {\cal T} \biggl( \int_{0}^{y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}}-\int^{0}_{-y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}} \biggr)dy \biggl[ q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} + \bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} \biggr] \nonumber \\ & = {\cal T} \underbrace{\int_{0}^{y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}}}_{x_1^{}>x_2^{}} dy \biggl[ \underbrace{q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{})}_{A}\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} + \underbrace{\bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{})}_{B}\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} \biggr] \nonumber \\ &-{\cal T} \underbrace{\int^{0}_{-y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}}}_{x_2^{}>x_1^{}} dy \biggl[ \underbrace{\bar{q}(x_2^{}) q(x_1^{})}_B \ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} + \underbrace{q(x_2^{}) \bar{q}(x_1^{})}_{A}\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle d_{}^{\tau} \biggr] \nonumber \\ = {\cal T} \int_{0}^{y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}} & dy\ 2 \Bigl[ q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{})-\bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{}) \Bigr] d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 0 & c_3^{} \sigma \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \\ 0 & 0 & c_3^{} \sigma \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \\ c_3^{} \sigma \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigr)^*_{} & c_3^{} \sigma \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigr)^*_{} & 0 \\ \end{array} \right) d_{}^{\tau},\label{eq:PartdifferentialZH2} \end{aligned}\] where, in the last equality, \(\bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle\) and \(\bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle\) are subtracted. As a result, in contrast to the approach \({\cal A}\), only the elements that have the overall \(\sigma\) survive.\
The \(\cos{\theta}\) integration in the approaches \({\cal C}\) and \({\cal D}\) results in
where the constant values \(c_i^{}\) \((i=4,5)\) are summarised in Table [2](#table:coefficients){reference-type="ref" reference="table:coefficients"}. Notice again that the sign in front of the elements that have the overall \(\sigma\) is different between \(\overline{ \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \rangle }\) and \(\overline{ \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \rangle }\). The integration over \(y\) and \(\cos{\theta}\) in the approaches \({\cal C}\) and \({\cal D}\) proceeds in the same manners as eq. ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH1\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH1"}) and eq. ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH2\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH2"}), respectively: \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{s}\ d\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\ d\widehat{\phi} }\biggr|_{{\cal C}}^{} & = {\cal T} \int_{-y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}}^{y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}} dy \biggl[ q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \overline{ \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle } d_{}^{\tau} + \bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \overline{ \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle } d_{}^{\tau} \biggr] \nonumber \\ = {\cal T} \int_{0}^{y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}} & dy\ 2 \Bigl[ q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{}) + \bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{}) \Bigr] d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 0 & c_4^{} \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \\ 0 & 0 &-c_4^{} \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \\ c_4^{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigr)^*_{} &-c_4^{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigr)^*_{} & 0 \\ \end{array} \right) d_{}^{\tau}, \label{eq:PartdifferentialZH3} \end{aligned}\] \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{s}\ d\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\ d\widehat{\phi} }\biggr|_{{\cal D}}^{} & = {\cal T} \biggl( \int_{0}^{y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}}-\int^{0}_{-y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}} \biggr)dy \biggl[ q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \overline{ \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(q\bar{q}) \bigr \rangle } d_{}^{\tau} + \bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \overline{ \bigl \langle \rho_{\sigma}^{}(\bar{q}q) \bigr \rangle } d_{}^{\tau} \biggr] \nonumber \\ = {\cal T} \int_{0}^{y_{\mathrm{cut}}^{}} & dy\ 2 \Bigl[ q(x_1^{}) \bar{q}(x_2^{})-\bar{q}(x_1^{}) q(x_2^{}) \Bigr] d_{}^{\tau \dagger} \sum_{\sigma}^{} \left( \begin{array}{ccc} c_5^{} \sigma \bigl| \hat{M}_{\sigma}^+ \bigr|^2_{} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 &-c_5^{} \sigma \bigl| \hat{M}_{\sigma}^-\bigr|^2_{} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right) d_{}^{\tau}.\label{eq:PartdifferentialZH4} \end{aligned}\] Only the elements that do not have the overall \(\sigma\) survive in eq. ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH3\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH3){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH3"}), while only the elements that have the overall \(\sigma\) survive in eq. ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH4\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH4){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH4"}).\
The differential cross sections with respect to \(\hat{s}\) and the decay angles \(\widehat{\theta}\) and \(\widehat{\phi}\) have 9 independent angular distributions and can be expressed as \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{s}\ d\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\ d\widehat{\phi} }\biggr|_{i(={\cal A, B, C, D})}^{} &= F_{i1}^{} \bigl(1+\cos^2_{}{\widehat{\theta}} \bigr) + F_{i2}^{} \bigl(1-3\cos^2_{}{\widehat{\theta}} \bigr) + F_{i3}^{} \cos{\widehat{\theta}} \nonumber \\ & + F_{i4}^{} \sin{\widehat{\theta}} \cos{\widehat{\phi}} + F_{i5}^{} \sin{2\widehat{\theta}} \cos{\widehat{\phi}} + F_{i6}^{} \sin^2_{}{\widehat{\theta}} \cos{2\widehat{\phi}} \nonumber \\ & + F_{i7}^{} \sin{\widehat{\theta}} \sin{\widehat{\phi}} + F_{i8}^{} \sin{2\widehat{\theta}} \sin{\widehat{\phi}} + F_{i9}^{} \sin^2_{}{\widehat{\theta}} \sin{2\widehat{\phi}},\label{eq:diffcrossgeneral} \end{aligned}\] where the coefficients \(F_{ia}^{}\) \((i={\cal A, B, C, D})\) \((a=1,2,\cdots,9)\) are functions of \(\hat{s}\) and written in terms of the non-vanishing elements in eqs. ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH1\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH1"}), ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH2\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH2"}), ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH3\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH3){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH3"}) and ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH4\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH4){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH4"}). Note that there are in total 36 (\(=4 \times 9\)) coefficients. It is straightforward to obtain the explicit form of the coefficients \(F_{ia}^{}\) \((i={\cal A, B, C, D})\) \((a=1,2,\cdots,9)\):
where
Among the 36 coefficients, only the 15 coefficients can be non-zero. It is easy to notice that there are the 10 combinations of the elements of the density matrix in total. However, only 9 of them are independent [^6]. Some of them are strictly zero, if the amplitudes satisfy the restriction in eq. ([\[eq:CPinvZ-2\]](#eq:CPinvZ-2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPinvZ-2"}) from CP invariance and/or the restriction in eq. ([\[eq:CPTinvZ-2\]](#eq:CPTinvZ-2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPTinvZ-2"}) from \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) invariance. These symmetry properties can be explicitly checked in the following way. By applying the restrictions in eqs. ([\[eq:CPinvZ-2\]](#eq:CPinvZ-2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPinvZ-2"}) and ([\[eq:CPTinvZ-2\]](#eq:CPTinvZ-2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPTinvZ-2"}) to the combination in \(f_{{\cal A}9}^{}\), we find \[\begin{aligned}
\mathrm{CP}\ \mathrm{invariance}:\ & {\it Im} \bigl[ \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigr] = {\it Im} \bigl[ | \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} |^2_{} \bigr] = 0, \nonumber \\ \mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\ \mathrm{invariance}:\ & {\it Im} \bigl[ \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigr] = {\it Im} \bigl[ ( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} )^2_{} \bigr] \ne 0, \end{aligned}\] where the former means that CP invariance requires it to be zero, while the latter means that \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) invariance does not require it to be zero. This indicates that observation of a nonzero value in \(F_{ {\cal A}9}^{}\) signals CP violation. Similarly, by applying the restrictions in eqs. ([\[eq:CPinvZ-2\]](#eq:CPinvZ-2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPinvZ-2"}) and ([\[eq:CPTinvZ-2\]](#eq:CPTinvZ-2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPTinvZ-2"}) to the combination in \(f_{{\cal B}8}^{}\) and \(f_{{\cal C}7}^{}\), we find \[\begin{aligned}
\mathrm{CP}\ \mathrm{invariance}:\ & {\it Im} \bigl[ \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0}-\bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigr] = {\it Im} \bigl\{ 2 i {\it Im}\bigl[ \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigr] \bigr\} \ne 0,\nonumber \\ \mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\ \mathrm{invariance}:\ & {\it Im} \bigl[ \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0}-\bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigr] = {\it Im} \bigl[ \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0}-\hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \bigr] = 0, \end{aligned}\] where \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) invariance requires it to be zero, while CP invariance does not. This indicates that observation of a nonzero value in \(F_{ {\cal B}8}^{}\) or \(F_{ {\cal C}7}^{}\) signals \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) violation. Finally, by applying the restrictions in eqs. ([\[eq:CPinvZ-2\]](#eq:CPinvZ-2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPinvZ-2"}) and ([\[eq:CPTinvZ-2\]](#eq:CPTinvZ-2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:CPTinvZ-2"}) to the combination in \(f_{{\cal B}5}^{}\) and \(f_{{\cal C}4}^{}\), we find \[\begin{aligned}
\mathrm{CP}\ \mathrm{invariance}:\ & {\it Re} \bigl[ \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0}-\bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigr] = {\it Re} \bigl\{ 2 i {\it Im}\bigl[ \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigr] \bigr\} = 0,\nonumber \\ \mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\ \mathrm{invariance}:\ & {\it Re} \bigl[ \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0}-\bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{-} \bigr] = {\it Re} \bigl[ \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0}-\hat{M}_{\sigma}^{0} \bigl( \hat{M}_{\sigma}^{+} \bigr)^*_{} \bigr] = 0, \end{aligned}\] where both CP invariance and \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) invariance require it to be zero. This indicates that observation of a nonzero value in \(F_{ {\cal B}5}^{}\) or \(F_{ {\cal C}4}^{}\) signals both CP violation *and* \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) violation. These symmetry properties of the 10 combinations are summarised in Table [3](#table:symproperty){reference-type="ref" reference="table:symproperty"}. The symbol \(+\) means that the symmetry does not require the combination to be zero, while \(-\) means that the symmetry requires the combination to be zero. We also show the coefficients \(F_{ia}^{}\) by measuring which the combinations of the density matrix elements can be determined. The symbol \(\circ\) in the column \"\(f\) charge\" means that observation of the coefficient \(F_{ia}^{}\) requires distinguishing the fermion \(f\) from the antifermion \(\bar{f}\). In other words, it requires identification of the charge (flavor) of the final fermion \(f\). This can be confirmed by performing a translation \(\widehat{\theta} \to \pi-\widehat{\theta}\) *and* \(\widehat{\phi} \to \widehat{\phi} + \pi\) in eq. ([\[eq:diffcrossgeneral\]](#eq:diffcrossgeneral){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:diffcrossgeneral"}) and observing the change of the sign. Among the 15 coefficients, only 9 of them do not require the charge identification of the final fermion \(f\). It should be emphasised that these 9 coefficients are necessary and sufficient to determine all of the 9 independent combinations of the density matrix elements.\
The coefficients \(F_{ia}^{}\) \((i={\cal A, B, C, D})\) \((a=1,2,\cdots,9)\) will be experimentally determined by measuring the decay angles \(\widehat{\theta}\) and \(\widehat{\phi}\) in the rest frame of the \(Z\) boson (see eq. ([\[eq:decaykinematics\]](#eq:decaykinematics){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:decaykinematics"})), since we completely know the differential angular distributions as eq. ([\[eq:diffcrossgeneral\]](#eq:diffcrossgeneral){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:diffcrossgeneral"}). We just do not know the coefficients \(F_{ia}^{}\) which uniquely depend on a state of polarisation of the \(Z\) boson. With appropriate integration over \(\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\) and \(\widehat{\phi}\), it is possible to isolate the angular distributions:
and
Here the index \(i(={\cal A, B, C, D})\) is omitted. By combining the 2 approaches in eq. ([\[eq:cosIntall\]](#eq:cosIntall){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:cosIntall"}) and the 5 approaches in eq. ([\[eq:phiIntall\]](#eq:phiIntall){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:phiIntall"}), we obtain the \(10\) (\(=2\times 5\)) combinations. The 2 of them simply give zero (i.e. eqs. ([\[eq:cosInt22\]](#eq:cosInt22){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:cosInt22"}) and ([\[eq:phiInt3\]](#eq:phiInt3){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:phiInt3"}), and eqs. ([\[eq:cosInt22\]](#eq:cosInt22){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:cosInt22"}) and ([\[eq:phiInt5\]](#eq:phiInt5){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:phiInt5"})). Each of the remaining 8 combinations gives one of \(F_a^{}\) \((a=1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9)\). For example, eqs. ([\[eq:cosInt22\]](#eq:cosInt22){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:cosInt22"}) and ([\[eq:phiInt2\]](#eq:phiInt2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:phiInt2"}) gives \(F_5^{}\). Only \(F_2^{}\) is not determined in this method. By a fitting procedure in the differential cross section with respect to \(\hat{s}\) and \(\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\) in eq. ([\[eq:phiInt1\]](#eq:phiInt1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:phiInt1"}), \(F_2^{}\) may be determined.
## Influences of non-standard \(HZZ\) and \(HZ\gamma\) interactions {#sec:angcoeff}
In the previous section, we have clarified the restrictions on the coefficients of the differential angular distributions imposed by the CP and \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) symmetries; see Table [3](#table:symproperty){reference-type="ref" reference="table:symproperty"}. Some of the coefficients are strictly zero in the SM due to CP invariance and some of them are small in the SM due to the smallness of re-scattering effects. These coefficients are in particular interesting as observables at the LHC, since observation of a non-zero or large value in these coefficients immediately signals the existence of physics beyond the SM. In this Section, we focus on these coefficients and study the influences of the non-standard \(HZZ\) and \(HZ\gamma\) couplings.\
Our numerical results are produced for the \(14\) TeV LHC. We set \(m_H^{}=125.5\) GeV, and \(\epsilon =0\) in the \(\cos{\theta}\) integration; see eqs. ([\[eq:cosInt1\]](#eq:cosInt1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:cosInt1"}) and ([\[eq:cosInt2\]](#eq:cosInt2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:cosInt2"}), and Table [2](#table:coefficients){reference-type="ref" reference="table:coefficients"}. As the final fermion flavor \(f\) summed in eq. ([\[eq:simplywriting\]](#eq:simplywriting){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:simplywriting"}), only the electron and the muon are considered when calculating the coefficients \(F_{ia}^{}\) \((i={\cal A, B, C, D})\) \((a=3,4,7)\) (Recall that observation of these coefficients requires the charge identification of \(f\)), and all the quark flavors but the top quark are additionally considered when calculating the other coefficients. MSTW PDFs are used. The phase space integration is performed with the program BASES .\
In Figure [\[figure:ZHplot1\]](#figure:ZHplot1){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:ZHplot1"}, the coefficients \(-F_{{\cal A} 9}^{}\) (left panel), \(F_{{\cal C} 8}^{}\) (middle panel) and \(F_{{\cal B} 7}^{}\) (right panel) divided by \(F_{{\cal A} 1}^{}\) are shown [^7]. For each result, the values in the 5 bins, from left to right, are obtained after integration over \(\hat{s}\) in the regions \((m_Z^{}+m_H^{}) < \hat{s}^{1/2}_{} < 300\), \(300 < \hat{s}^{1/2}_{} < 400\), \(400 < \hat{s}^{1/2}_{} < 600\), \(600 < \hat{s}^{1/2}_{} < 1000\) and \(1000 < \hat{s}^{1/2}_{} < 14000\) in units of GeV. In each panel, \(\Box\) points give predictions for the CP-odd form factor \(\widetilde{h}_4^Z=0.1\), and \(\times\) points give those for the CP-odd form factor \(\widetilde{h}_4^{\gamma}=0.1\). CP invariance requires these 4 coefficients to be identically zero, thus observation of a non-zero value signals CP violation.\
The coefficients \(F_{{\cal C} 8}^{}\) and \(F_{{\cal B} 7}^{}\) measure the same combination of the density matrix elements (see Table [3](#table:symproperty){reference-type="ref" reference="table:symproperty"}), thus show the same dependence on \(\hat{s}^{1/2}_{}\). However, \(F_{{\cal C} 8}^{}\)'s sensitivity to \(\widetilde{h}_4^Z\) is stronger than its sensitivity to \(\widetilde{h}_4^{\gamma}\), while \(F_{{\cal B} 7}^{}\)'s sensitivity to \(\widetilde{h}_4^Z\) is comparable to its sensitivity to \(\widetilde{h}_4^{\gamma}\). This difference originates from the overall \(\sigma\) in \(f_{{\cal B} 7}^{}\) and is explained as follows. Eq. ([\[eq:Zsubamplitudes\]](#eq:Zsubamplitudes){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Zsubamplitudes"}) shows that \(\hat{M}^{\lambda}_+\) and \(\hat{M}^{\lambda}_-\) can be written in the following simplified form as the sum of the \(Z\) boson contribution and the \(\gamma\) contribution:
By using this expression, we derive
The couplings \(g_{Z+}^{}\) and \(g_{Z-}^{}\) have opposite signs to each other, both for the up-type quarks and for the down-type quarks. The interference term between the \(Z\) boson contribution and the \(\gamma\) contribution in eq. ([\[eq:interfer1\]](#eq:interfer1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:interfer1"}) and that in eq. ([\[eq:interfer2\]](#eq:interfer2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:interfer2"}), therefore, have opposite signs to each other, too. Considering \(f_{\gamma}^{\lambda}=0\) at the tree level approximation in the SM, the interference terms may give a larger contribution than the \((f_{\gamma}^{\lambda^{\prime}_{}})^*_{} f_{\gamma}^{\lambda}\) term. The coefficient \(F_{{\cal C} 8}^{}\) has a structure that eq. ([\[eq:interfer1\]](#eq:interfer1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:interfer1"}) and eq. ([\[eq:interfer2\]](#eq:interfer2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:interfer2"}) are added and the interference terms tend to cancel to each other. On the other hand, \(F_{{\cal B} 7}^{}\) has a structure that eq. ([\[eq:interfer2\]](#eq:interfer2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:interfer2"}) and eq. ([\[eq:interfer1\]](#eq:interfer1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:interfer1"}) are subtracted due to the overall \(\sigma\) in \(f_{{\cal B} 7}^{}\), and the interference terms contribute in the same direction. Therefore, as long as \(f_{\gamma}^{\lambda}\) (i.e the \(HZ\gamma\) coupling) is small, the effects of it appear larger in \(F_{{\cal B} 7}^{}\) than in \(F_{{\cal C} 8}^{}\). Notice that this discussion is independent on explicit choices for \(\lambda\) and \(\lambda^{\prime}_{}\). The above finding is true not only in \(F_{{\cal B} 7}^{}\) but also in the other coefficients which have the overall \(\sigma\) in \(f_{{i}a}^{}\). These coefficients are indicated by the symbol \(\circ\) in the column \"\(HZ\gamma\)\" in Table [3](#table:symproperty){reference-type="ref" reference="table:symproperty"}.\
In Figure [\[figure:ZHplot2\]](#figure:ZHplot2){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:ZHplot2"}, the coefficients \(F_{{\cal B} 8}^{}\) (left panel) and \(F_{{\cal C} 7}^{}\) (right panel) divided by \(F_{{\cal A} 1}^{}\) are shown in the same manner as Figure [\[figure:ZHplot1\]](#figure:ZHplot1){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:ZHplot1"}. \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) invariance requires these 2 coefficients to be identically zero, hence observation of a non-zero value indicates the existence of re-scattering effects. Re-scattering effects can be approximately included by allowing imaginary parts in the form factors . In each panel, \(\Box\) points give predictions for \(h_3^Z=0+0.1i\), and \(\times\) points give those for \(h_3^{\gamma}=0+0.1i\).\
In Figure [\[figure:ZHplot3\]](#figure:ZHplot3){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:ZHplot3"}, the coefficients \(F_{{\cal A} 3}^{}\) (left panel), \(F_{{\cal D} 1}^{}\) (middle-left panel), \(-F_{{\cal B} 5}^{}\) (middle-right panel) and \(-F_{{\cal C} 4}^{}\) (right panel) divided by \(F_{{\cal A} 1}^{}\) are shown in the same manner as Figure [\[figure:ZHplot1\]](#figure:ZHplot1){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:ZHplot1"}. These 4 coefficients are doubly constrained to be identically zero by CP invariance *and* \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) invariance: they are strictly zero if CP is conserved, even if \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) is violated, for instance. Observation of a non-zero value indicates CP violation *and* the existence of re-scattering effects. In each panel, \(\Box\) points give predictions for the CP-odd from factor \(\widetilde{h}_4^Z=0+0.1i\), and \(\times\) points give those for the CP-odd form factor \(\widetilde{h}_4^{\gamma}=0+0.1i\).
# Polarisation of the \(W\) boson {#sec:polWboson}
In this section, we analyse the density matrices of the \(W^{+}_{}\) and \(W^{-}_{}\) in the process \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\) following the same procedure as Section [3](#sec:densitymatrix){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:densitymatrix"}. Because (1) a determination of the density matrix of the \(W\) boson is difficult in \(pp\) collisions when the \(W\) boson decays into a charged lepton and a neutrino and (2) we cannot distinguish \(W^+_{}\) from \(W^-_{}\) in view of the difficulty of flavor identification of both \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\) decay products when the \(W\) boson decays into two quarks, we consider the process \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\) (\(W^{\pm}_{} \to jj\)) as the sum of the process \(pp \to W^+_{}H\) (\(W^+_{} \to jj\)) and the process \(pp \to W^-_{}H\) (\(W^-_{} \to jj\)). Just as the process \(pp\to ZH\), only the \(15\) coefficients among the \(36\) coefficients of the 4 different differential angular distributions of the dijets can be non-zero. However only 9 coefficients among these \(15\) coefficients are actually measurable.
## Polarisation density matrices of the \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\) {#sec:densitymatrixW}
First of all, we define the density matrices of the \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\). We consider the sub-processes
where the helicity of each particle is shown in parenthesis. We neglect the masses of the quark and the antiquark from the \(W\) decay, hence the helicity of the antiquark is always opposite to that of the quark. We prepare the 4 full helicity amplitudes \({\cal T}(u\bar{d})\), \({\cal T}(d\bar{u})\), \({\cal T}(\bar{d}u)\) and \({\cal T}(\bar{u}d)\) in which the production amplitude is evaluated in the \(u\bar{d}\) c.m. frame, the \(d\bar{u}\) c.m. frame, the \(\bar{d}u\) c.m. frame and the \(\bar{u}d\) c.m. frame, respectively. Recall that these c.m. frames are shown in Figure [\[figure:frames\]](#figure:frames){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:frames"} and the production amplitudes are given in eqs. ([\[eq:WpampAll\]](#eq:WpampAll){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:WpampAll"}) and ([\[eq:WmampAll\]](#eq:WmampAll){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:WmampAll"}). These 4 full helicity amplitudes are given by
where \[\begin{aligned}
P_W^{} = ( Q^2_{}-m_W^2 + i m_W^{} \Gamma_W^{} )^{-1}_{} \end{aligned}\] denotes the propagator factor of the \(W\) boson, \(D^{}_{\lambda}\) is the helicity amplitude for the decay process \(W^+_{} \to u \bar{d}\) and \(\widetilde{D}^{}_{\lambda}\) is the helicity amplitude for the decay process \(W^-_{} \to d \bar{u}\):
where \(d^-_{\lambda}\) is given in eq. ([\[eq:decayamp\]](#eq:decayamp){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:decayamp"}). The decay amplitudes are evaluated in the following four-momentum frame: \[\begin{aligned}
W^+_{}\ (W^-_{}):&\ \ \bigl( m_W^{},0, 0, 0 \bigr) \nonumber \\ u \ \ (d):&\ \ \frac{m_W^{}}{2}\bigl( 1,\ \sin{\widehat{\theta}} \cos{\widehat{\phi}},\ \sin{\widehat{\theta}} \sin{\widehat{\phi}},\ \cos{\widehat{\theta}} \bigr) \nonumber \\ \bar{d}\ \ (\bar{u}) :&\ \ \frac{m_W^{}}{2}\bigl( 1,\-\sin{\widehat{\theta}} \cos{\widehat{\phi}},\-\sin{\widehat{\theta}} \sin{\widehat{\phi}},\-\cos{\widehat{\theta}} \bigr). \label{eq:decaykinematics-W} \end{aligned}\] Then we obtain
where
represent the elements of the density matrix in the helicity basis of the \(W^+_{}\) in the \(u\bar{d}\) c.m. frame and those in the \(\bar{d}u\) c.m. frame, respectively, and
represent the elements of the density matrix in the helicity basis of the \(W^-_{}\) in the \(d\bar{u}\) c.m. frame and those in the \(\bar{u}d\) c.m. frame, respectively. By looking at the amplitudes in eqs. ([\[eq:WpampAll\]](#eq:WpampAll){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:WpampAll"}) and ([\[eq:WmampAll\]](#eq:WmampAll){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:WmampAll"}), it is easy to find the relations
The relations indicate that the \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\) are always in the same state of polarisation. This fact makes our analysis in the next section simpler, because we do not have to distinguish the \(W^+_{}\) from the \(W^-_{}\) with regard to states of polarisation.
## Decay angular distributions of the polarised \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\) {#sec:corsspolW}
The complete differential cross section for the process \(pp \to W^+_{}H\) followed by \(W^+_{} \to jj\) in the narrow width approximation can be expressed in terms of the density matrices in eq. ([\[eq:densityMW12\]](#eq:densityMW12){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:densityMW12"}) as \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{d\sigma^{W^+_{}}_{}}{d\hat{s}\ dy\ d\cos{\theta}\ d\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\ d\widehat{\phi} } = & \frac{m_W^{}k}{ 8192 \pi^3_{} \Gamma_W^{} s \hat{s}^{\frac{3}{2}}_{}} g^2_{} \Bigl(\sum_{u, d} \bigl| V_{ud}^{} \bigr|^2_{} \Bigr)\nonumber \\ & \times \sum_{u,d} \biggl[ u(x_1^{}) \bar{d}(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{-\dagger} \rho_{}^{}(u\bar{d}) d_{}^{-} + \bar{d}(x_1^{}) u(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{-\dagger} \rho_{}^{}(\bar{d}u) d_{}^{-} \biggr],\label{eq:differentialWH1} \end{aligned}\] and that for the process \(pp \to W^-_{}H\) followed by \(W^-_{} \to jj\) can be expressed in terms of the density matrices in eq. ([\[eq:densityMW34\]](#eq:densityMW34){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:densityMW34"}) as \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{d\sigma^{W^-_{}}_{}}{d\hat{s}\ dy\ d\cos{\theta}\ d\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\ d\widehat{\phi} } = & \frac{m_W^{}k}{ 8192 \pi^3_{} \Gamma_W^{} s \hat{s}^{\frac{3}{2}}_{}} g^2_{} \Bigl(\sum_{u, d} \bigl| V_{ud}^{} \bigr|^2_{} \Bigr)\nonumber \\ & \times \sum_{u,d} \biggl[ d(x_1^{}) \bar{u}(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{-\dagger} \rho_{}^{}(d\bar{u}) d_{}^{-} + \bar{u}(x_1^{}) d(x_2^{})\ d_{}^{-\dagger} \rho_{}^{}(\bar{u}d) d_{}^{-} \biggr], \label{eq:differentialWH2} \end{aligned}\] where the \(3\times 3\) matrix form in eq. ([\[eq:matrixform\]](#eq:matrixform){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:matrixform"}) is used. For the definition of variables, see below eq. ([\[eq:differentialZH\]](#eq:differentialZH){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:differentialZH"}). As the quark flavors \(u\) and \(d\) summed in the above equations, we consider all the quark flavors but the top quark. As a result, the unitarity of the CKM matrix gives \(\sum_{u, d} | V_{ud}^{} |^2_{} = 2\). By using the relations in eq. ([\[eq:relationdensitymatrix\]](#eq:relationdensitymatrix){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relationdensitymatrix"}), we obtain the complete differential cross section for the process \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\) followed by \(W^{\pm}_{} \to jj\) as the sum of the above two cross sections in the following compact form: \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{d\sigma^{W^+_{}+W^-_{}}_{}}{d\hat{s}\ dy\ d\cos{\theta}\ d\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\ d\widehat{\phi} } & = \frac{m_W^{}k}{ 4096 \pi^3_{} \Gamma_W^{} s \hat{s}^{\frac{3}{2}}_{}} g^2_{} \nonumber \\ \times \sum_{u,d} \biggl[ \Bigl\{ u(x_1^{}) & \bar{d}(x_2^{}) + d(x_1^{}) \bar{u}(x_2^{}) \Bigr\}\ d_{}^{-\dagger} \rho(u\bar{d}) d_{}^{-} + \Bigl\{ \bar{u}(x_1^{}) d(x_2^{}) + \bar{d}(x_1^{}) u(x_2^{}) \Bigr\}\ d_{}^{-\dagger} \rho(\bar{d}u) d_{}^{-} \biggr].\label{eq:differentialWH} \end{aligned}\] As in Section [3.2](#sec:crossZboson){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:crossZboson"}, we derive the differential cross section with respect to \(\hat{s}\), \(\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\) and \(\widehat{\phi}\) by integrating over \(y\) and \(\cos{\theta}\) in eq. ([\[eq:differentialWH\]](#eq:differentialWH){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:differentialWH"}). It is straightforward to confirm that the integration over \(y\) and \(\cos{\theta}\) in the 4 different approaches summarised in Table [1](#table:integration){reference-type="ref" reference="table:integration"} can be performed in the same manner as eqs. ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH1\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH1"}), ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH2\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH2"}), ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH3\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH3){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH3"}) and ([\[eq:PartdifferentialZH4\]](#eq:PartdifferentialZH4){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:PartdifferentialZH4"}). The resulting differential cross sections are
where \[\begin{aligned}
{\cal T}^W_{} =\frac{m_W^{}k}{ 4096 \pi^3_{} \Gamma_W^{} s \hat{s}^{\frac{3}{2}}_{}} g^2_{} \sum_{u, d} \bigl| V_{ud}^{} \bigr|^2_{}, \end{aligned}\] the constant values \(c_i^{}\) \((i=1,2,3,4,5)\) are summarised in Table [2](#table:coefficients){reference-type="ref" reference="table:coefficients"}, and \(\hat{N}^{\lambda=\pm,0}_{}\) are defined in eq. ([\[eq:Wsubamplitudes\]](#eq:Wsubamplitudes){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Wsubamplitudes"}). By comparing the above 4 differential cross sections with eq. ([\[eq:diffcrossgeneral\]](#eq:diffcrossgeneral){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:diffcrossgeneral"}), we obtain the 36 coefficients \(F_{ia}^{W}\) \((i={\cal A, B, C, D})\) \((a=1,2,\cdots,9)\) in total:
where \(f_{ia}^{W}\) \((i={\cal A, B, C, D})\) \((a=1,2,\cdots,9)\) are obtained by the following replacements in those coefficients of the process \(pp \to ZH\) in eq. ([\[eq:observables-small\]](#eq:observables-small){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:observables-small"}): \[\begin{aligned}
\hat{M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda} \to \hat{N}_{}^{\lambda}, \ \ \sigma \to-1,\ \ \tau \to-1. \end{aligned}\] Table [3](#table:symproperty){reference-type="ref" reference="table:symproperty"} corresponding to the process \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\) is obtained by the following simple replacements in Table [3](#table:symproperty){reference-type="ref" reference="table:symproperty"}: \[\begin{aligned}
\hat{M}_{\sigma}^{\lambda} \to \hat{N}_{}^{\lambda}, \ \ F_{ia}^{} \to F_{ia}^{W}. \end{aligned}\] Just as the process \(pp\to ZH\), there are in total \(15\) coefficients which can be non-zero. Observation of the 6 coefficients \(F_{{\cal D} 3}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal A} 3}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal B} 4}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal C} 4}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal B} 7}^{W}\) and \(F_{{\cal C} 7}^{W}\) has difficulty, since it requires the charge (or flavor) identification of the parent quark of the jet. Only the remaining 9 coefficients \(F_{{\cal A} 1}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal A} 2}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal D} 1}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal C} 5}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal B} 5}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal A} 6}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal C} 8}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal B} 8}^{W}\) and \(F_{{\cal A} 9}^{W}\) are, therefore, actually measurable. We emphasise that these 9 coefficients are necessary and sufficient to determine all of the 9 independent combinations of the density matrix elements.
## Influences of non-standard \(HWW\) interaction {#sec:angcoeff-W}
In this Section, with the same motivation as Section [3.3](#sec:angcoeff){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:angcoeff"}, we focus on the measurable coefficients which are strictly zero or small in the SM, and study the influences of the non-standard \(HWW\) coupling. In the left panel of Figure [\[figure:WHplot\]](#figure:WHplot){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:WHplot"}, the 2 coefficients \(-F_{{\cal A} 9}^{W}\) (\(\Box\)) and \(F_{{\cal C} 8}^{W}\) (\(\times\)) divided by \(F_{{\cal A} 1}^{W}\) are shown for the CP-odd form factor \(\widetilde{h}_4^W=0.1\). CP invariance requires these 2 coefficients to be identically zero; observation of a non-zero value signals CP violation. In the middle panel of Figure [\[figure:WHplot\]](#figure:WHplot){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:WHplot"}, the coefficient \(F_{{\cal B} 8}^{W}\) divided by \(F_{{\cal A} 1}^{W}\) is shown for the CP-even form factor \(h_3^W=0+0.1i\). \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) invariance requires this coefficient to be identically zero; observation of a non-zero value indicates the existence of re-scattering effects. In the right panel of Figure [\[figure:WHplot\]](#figure:WHplot){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:WHplot"}, the 2 coefficients \(F_{{\cal D} 1}^{W}\) (\(\Box\)) and \(-F_{{\cal B} 5}^{W}\) (\(\times\)) divided by \(F_{{\cal A} 1}^{W}\) are shown for the CP-odd form factor \(\widetilde{h}_4^W=0+0.1i\). These 2 coefficients are doubly constrained to be identically zero by CP invariance *and* \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) invariance; observation of a non-zero value indicates CP violation *and* the existence of re-scattering effects. For each result, the values in the 5 bins, from left to right, are obtained after integration over \(\hat{s}\) in the regions \((m_W^{}+m_H^{}) < \hat{s}^{1/2}_{} < 300\), \(300 < \hat{s}^{1/2}_{} < 400\), \(400 < \hat{s}^{1/2}_{} < 600\), \(600 < \hat{s}^{1/2}_{} < 1000\) and \(1000 < \hat{s}^{1/2}_{} < 14000\) in units of GeV.\
We discuss the differences between the coefficients \(F_{ia}^{}\) in the process \(pp\to ZH\) and those \(F_{ia}^{W}\) in the process \(pp\to W^{\pm}_{}H\). From the comparisons between the results for the non-standard \(HZZ\) coupling in Figures [\[figure:ZHplot1\]](#figure:ZHplot1){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:ZHplot1"}, [\[figure:ZHplot2\]](#figure:ZHplot2){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:ZHplot2"} and [\[figure:ZHplot3\]](#figure:ZHplot3){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:ZHplot3"} and the results for the non-standard \(HWW\) coupling in Figure [\[figure:WHplot\]](#figure:WHplot){reference-type="ref" reference="figure:WHplot"}, we notice that \(F_{{\cal A} 9}^{W}\) and \(F_{{\cal C} 8}^{W}\) are comparable with \(F_{{\cal A} 9}^{}\) and \(F_{{\cal C} 8}^{}\), respectively, while \(F_{{\cal B} 8}^{W}\), \(F_{{\cal D} 1}^{W}\) and \(F_{{\cal B} 5}^{W}\) are consistently larger than \(F_{{\cal B} 8}^{}\), \(F_{{\cal D} 1}^{}\) and \(F_{{\cal B} 5}^{}\), respectively. As we have discussed at the last paragraph of Section [2.2](#sec:helamp){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:helamp"}, the \(Z\) boson is in a partially polarised state, while the \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\) are in a completely polarised state. The degree of polarisation affects the magnitudes of the coefficients, hence it is expected that the coefficients \(F_{ia}^{W}\) are always equal or larger than the coefficients \(F_{ia}^{}\). The existence of the overall \(\sigma\) in \(F_{{\cal B} 8}^{}\), \(F_{{\cal D} 1}^{}\) and \(F_{{\cal B} 5}^{}\) (see eq. ([\[eq:observables-small\]](#eq:observables-small){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:observables-small"})) indicates that these coefficients are weakened according to the degree of polarisation of the \(Z\) boson. These coefficients are denoted by the symbol \(\circ\) in the last column in Table [3](#table:symproperty){reference-type="ref" reference="table:symproperty"}.
# Summary {#sec:summary}
The measurements of the Higgs boson couplings to the SM particles are essential tests of the SM. The \(Z\) boson in the process \(pp\to ZH\) and the \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\) in the process \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\) can be in polarised states, and it would be possible to study the Higgs boson couplings to the weak bosons (\(HZZ\), \(HZ\gamma\) and \(HWW\)) in detail from a careful analysis of these states of polarisation. A density matrix contains the complete information about a state of polarisation, and all of the elements of the density matrix should be made use of in such a careful analysis. In this paper, such an analysis approach has been presented.\
Determination of the density matrix of the \(Z\) (\(W\)) boson requires measurements of the angular distributions of the \(Z\) (\(W\)) decay products. In \(pp\) collisions, this is difficult when the \(W\) boson decays into a charged lepton and a neutrino. When the \(W\) boson decays into two quarks, we cannot distinguish \(W^+_{}\) from \(W^-_{}\) in view of the difficulty of flavor identification of both \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\) decay products. Therefore, we have considered the process \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\) (\(W^{\pm}_{} \to jj\)) as the sum of the process \(pp \to W^+_{}H\) (\(W^+_{} \to jj\)) and the process \(pp \to W^-_{}H\) (\(W^-_{} \to jj\)). We have found that the \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\) are always in the same state of polarisation (i.e. the density matrix of the \(W^+_{}\) is always the same as that of \(W^-_{}\)). By using this fact, we have developed an analysis approach which can be applied both to \(pp \to ZH\) (\(Z \to f\bar{f}\)) and to \(pp \to W^{\pm}_{}H\) (\(W^{\pm}_{} \to jj\)) in the same manner.\
We have derived the 4 different differential cross sections with respect to \(\hat{s}\) (the invariant mass squared of the \(Z\) (\(W\)) boson and the Higgs boson) and \(\cos{\widehat{\theta}}\) and \(\widehat{\phi}\) (the \(Z\) (\(W\)) decay angles), by integrating the complete differential cross section over the other phase space variables in the 4 different approaches. Among the 36 coefficients (\(=9 \times 4\)) of these 4 differential angular distributions, only 15 coefficients can be non-zero (these coefficients are summarised in Table [3](#table:symproperty){reference-type="ref" reference="table:symproperty"}). These 15 coefficients are written in terms of the elements of the density matrices, and there exist 9 independent combinations of the elements of the density matrices. Observation of the 9 coefficients among the 15 coefficients does not require the charge (or flavor) identification of the \(Z\) (\(W\)) decay products. In the analysis of the \(W^+_{}\) and \(W^-_{}\), only these 9 coefficients are measurable. We have found that these 9 coefficients are necessary and sufficient to determine all of the 9 independent combinations of the density matrix elements (i.e. one coefficient corresponds to one combination). We have clarified the restrictions on the 15 coefficients imposed by the CP and \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) symmetries. Some of the coefficients are required to be identically zero by CP invariance; observation of a non-zero value in these coefficients signals CP violation. Similarly, some of the coefficients are required to be identically zero by \(\mathrm{CP\widetilde{T}}\) invariance; observation of a non-zero value in these coefficients indicates the existence of re-scattering effects. These coefficients are in particular interesting as observables at the LHC, since observation of a non-zero or large value in these coefficients immediately signals the existence of non-standard \(HZZ\), \(HZ\gamma\) and/or \(HWW\) interactions. | {'timestamp': '2017-11-22T02:10:27', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01816', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01816'} |
null | null |
# Abstract {#abstract .unnumbered}
**We propose using smeared boundary states \(e^{-\tau H}|\cal B\rangle\) as variational approximations to the ground state of a conformal field theory deformed by relevant bulk operators. This is motivated by recent studies of quantum quenches in CFTs and of the entanglement spectrum in massive theories. It gives a simple criterion for choosing which boundary state should correspond to which combination of bulk operators, and leads to a rudimentary phase diagram of the theory in the vicinity of the RG fixed point corresponding to the CFT, as well as rigorous upper bounds on the universal amplitude of the free energy. In the case of the 2d minimal models explicit formulae are available. As a side result we show that the matrix elements of bulk operators between smeared Ishibashi states are simply given by the fusion rules of the CFT.**
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
# Introduction {#sec1}
Conformal field theories (CFTs) are supposed to correspond to the non-trivial renormalization group (RG) fixed points of relativistic quantum field theories (QFTs). Such theories typically contain a number of scaling operators of dimension \(\Delta<d\) (where \(d\) is the space-time dimension), which, if added to the action, are relevant and drive the theory to what is, generically, a trivial fixed point. The points along this trajectory then correspond to a massive QFT. In general there is a multiplicity of such basins of attraction of the RG flows, but enumerating them and determining which combinations of relevant operators lead to which basins, and therefore to what kind of massive QFT, in general requires non-perturbative methods. This problem is equivalent to mapping out the phase diagram in the vicinity of the critical point corresponding to the CFT. Another way of characterizing these massive theories is through the analysis of the possible boundary states of the CFT. Imagine the scenario in which the relevant operators are switched on in only a half-space, say \(x_0<0\). This will then appear as some boundary condition on the CFT in \(x_0>0\). However the boundary conditions themselves undergo RG flows, with fixed points corresponding to so-called conformal boundary conditions. Therefore on scales \(\sim M^{-1}\), where \(M\) is the mass scale of the perturbed theory, the correlations near the boundary should be those of a conformal boundary condition, deformed by *irrelevant *boundary operators. A similar question is raised through recent work on the spectrum of the entanglement hamiltonian in massive QFTs. If the theory is defined in \({\bf R}^D\) and is in its ground state, and we study the entanglement between the degrees of freedom in the half-space \(A: x_1>0\) and its complement, then the entanglement, or modular, hamiltonian \(K_A=-(1/2\pi)\log\rho_A\), where \(\rho_A\) is the reduced density matrix of \(A\), takes the form K_A=\_x_1\>0x_1T\_00(x)d\^Dx , which is nothing but the generator of rotations in euclidean space, or of boosts in lorentzian signature. In 1+1 dimensions we may consider a conformal transformation \(z=x_1+ix_0=\epsilon e^w\) which sends the euclidean \(z\)-plane, punctured at the origin by a disc of radius \(\epsilon\) representing the UV cutoff, to an semi-infinite cylinder of circumference \(2\pi\). \(K_A\) is then simply the generator of translations around this cylinder. However, if the QFT corresponds to a perturbed CFT, it is not conformally invariant, but rather the couplings transform as \^2-e\^(2-)Re w , where \(\Delta<2\) is the scaling dimension of the perturbing operator. Thus the dimensionless coupling \(g=\lambda\epsilon^{2-\Delta}\) is effectively switched on over a length scale \(O(1)\) near \({\rm Re}\,w\sim\log(1/g)\). If we are interested the low-lying spectrum of \(K_A\), corresponding to the Rényi entropies \({\rm Tr}\,\rho_A^n\) with \(n\gg1\), the effective circumference of the cylinder is \(2\pi n\) and we are then in a similar situation to the above, where the massive theory for \({\rm Re}\,w>\log(1/g)\) acts as an effective boundary condition on the CFT in \({\rm Re}\,w<\log(1/g)\). As concluded in, the low-lying spectrum of \(K_A\) should therefore be that of the (boundary) CFT, with an appropriate boundary condition depending on the bulk perturbation. The same question arises in the context of quantum quenches. In this case we are interested in the real time evolution of an initial state \(|\Psi_0\rangle\) under a hamiltonian \(H\) of which it is not an eigenstate. An example is the case where \(H=H_{CFT}\) and \(|\Psi_0\rangle\) is the ground state of the massive perturbed CFT. This is a difficult problem, and in the step was taken of replacing this ground state by a conformal boundary state perturbed by irrelevant operators.[^1] This allows the explicit computation of the imaginary time evolution and the continuation to real time, which would be very difficult for the exact ground state of the massive theory. Thus an important problem in all these cases is to determine to which conformal boundary condition a particular combination of bulk operators should correspond. For simple examples this is apparent by physical inspection. For example, the CFT corresponding to the critical Ising model has two relevant operators, coupling to the magnetic field \(h\) and the deviation \(t\) of the reduced temperature from its critical value. There are three stable RG fixed points at \((h=0,t\to+\infty)\) and \(h\to\pm\infty\), respectively the sinks for the disordered and the two ordered phases, and corresponding to the three conformal boundary conditions when the Ising spins are respectively free and fixed, either up or down. One way to make this identification is to think of the boundary condition as defining a state \(|\cal B\rangle\) when the theory is quantized on a time slice \(x_0=\) constant. In that language we may regard the perturbed CFT as described by a hamiltonian operator H=H\_CFT+\_j_j\_j(x)d\^d-1x , where the \(\{\hat\Phi_j\}\) are relevant operators. We then ask which \(|\cal B\rangle\), suitably deformed by boundary irrelevant operators, is closest in some sense to the ground state of \(\hat H\) at strong coupling. Conformal boundary states by themselves contain no scale, and therefore cannot be good candidates for the ground state of \(\hat H\). Indeed, they must have infinite energy compared to this state. In known examples in 2d (and, for example, for free theories in higher dimensions) they are also non-normalizable. We must therefore deform them by irrelevant boundary operators in order to give them a scale. The simplest such operator is the stress tensor \(\hat T_{00}\), which has scaling dimension \(d\) and therefore boundary RG eigenvalue \((d-1)-d=-1\). Since its space integral is the CFT hamiltonian, including only this operator is tantamount to considering boundary states 'smeared' by evolution in imaginary time: [\[smeared\]]{#smeared label="smeared"} e\^-H\_CFT\|B , where \(\tau>0\) is parameter with the dimensions of length. Such states have finite energy and correlation length \(\propto\tau^{-1}\), and also finite norm. Such smeared boundary states may be thought of as a continuum version of matrix product states (MPS). Indeed, a lattice discretization of the euclidean path integral, illustrated in Fig. [\[MPS\]](#MPS){reference-type="ref" reference="MPS"}, suggests that such states correspond to matrices with internal dimension \(\sim N^{\tau/\delta\tau}\), where \(N\) is the number of states on each lattice edge and \(\delta\tau\) is the time step. However, unlike discrete MPS states, the smeared boundary state ([\[smeared\]](#smeared){reference-type="ref" reference="smeared"}) automatically has the correct short-distance behavior of the CFT. From this point of view it is therefore natural to regard ([\[smeared\]](#smeared){reference-type="ref" reference="smeared"}) as a variational *ansatz*, with \(\tau\) and the choice of boundary state \(|\cal B\rangle\) as variational parameters. In this paper we explore this idea further and show that this program can be carried through explicitly for the \(A_m\) (diagonal) series of unitary minimal 2d CFTs. It should be extendable to the other non-diagonal minimal models, and in principle to other rational 2d CFTs, and indeed to higher dimensional theories if enough information is available about the CFT. More specifically, given a set of physical conformal boundary states \(\{|a\rangle\}\), (whose definition is recalled in Sec. [2](#sec2){reference-type="ref" reference="sec2"}) we take as a variational ground state \|{\_a},{\_a}=\_a_a e\^-\_aH\_CFT\|a , and compute the variational energy per unit volume \_L , minimizing this with respect to the \(\{\alpha_a\}\) and \(\{\tau_a\}\). An important general consequence of the analysis is that, in the limit \(L\to\infty\), the minimizing states are always purely physical, that is all but one \(\{\alpha_a\}\) vanishes. This is because both \(H_{CFT}\) and the perturbing operators turn out to be diagonal in this basis. This is reassuring, as in principle the minimizers could be non-physical linear combinations of these, for example the Ishibashi states in 1+1 dimensions. Specializing now to the case of 1+1 dimensions, for the minimal models, the precise values of these diagonal matrix elements are related to the elements of the modular \(S\)-matrix of the CFT, and, with these in hand, it is straightforward, for a fixed set of couplings \(\{\lambda_j\}\) to determine which values of \(\tau_a\) and \(a\) minimize the variational energy, and thus to map out a rudimentary phase diagram of the theory in the vicinity of the CFT. It then turns out that although this approach yields correct results in some aspects, for example in determining which combination of bulk couplings \(\{\lambda_j\}\) best matches a given boundary state \(a\), it is not capable of reproducing some of the finer details of the phase boundaries between different states \(a\). In this approximation these are always first-order, and 'massless' RG flows to other non-trivial CFTs are not properly accounted for. This can be seen as a limitation of the particular trial state, which could be remedied by including other operators acting on the boundary state, but at the cost of the loss of analytic tractability. However, an amusing side result of the analysis is that matrix elements of primary bulk operators \(\hat\Phi_j\) between Ishibashi states \(\langle\langle i|\), \(|k\rangle\rangle\) (which are boundary states within a single Virasoro module) are simply proportional to the fusion rule coefficients: i\|e\^-H \_j e\^-H\|kN\_ijk̇This is a consequence of the Verlinde formula, and to our knowledge has not been previously observed. Although this matrix element should be proportional to the OPE coefficient \(c_{ijk}\) which governs the matrix element \(\langle i|\hat\Phi_j|k\rangle\) between highest weight states, it is rather surprising that the contributions of all the descendent states should conspire to give the integer-valued fusion rule coefficient. The outline of this paper is as follows. In Sec. [2](#sec2){reference-type="ref" reference="sec2"} we set up the formalism and prove some general results. In Sec. [3](#sec3){reference-type="ref" reference="sec3"} we apply this to the case of the diagonal minimal models, with the \(A_3\) and \(A_4\) cases as specific examples, and finally in Sec. [4](#sec4){reference-type="ref" reference="sec4"} give a summary and some further remarks. After this paper was completed, I was made aware of Ref. , in which similar ideas are explored. However that paper is based on comparing ratios of overlaps between different boundary states and numerical approximations to the exact ground state of the deformed theory, rather than the variational method adopted here. The overlap method is shown to work well for the case of the perturbed Ising model, but is computationally more intensive.****
# General formalism. {#sec2}
As described in the Introduction, we consider a \(d\) \((=D+1)\)-dimensional CFT perturbed by its bulk primary operators \(\{\Phi_j\}\) with coupling constants \(\{\lambda_j\}\), so the hamiltonian is: [\[Hp\]]{#Hp label="Hp"} H=H\_CFT+\_j_j\_j(x)d\^DẋThe theory is quantized on a spatial torus of volume \(L^{D}\), where \(L\) is much larger than any other scale in the theory. We assume for simplicity that the \(\{\Phi_j\}\) are all scalars and that they have their CFT normalization [\[norm\]]{#norm label="norm"} \_j(x)\_j(0)\_CFT=\|x\|\^-2_j , where \(\Delta_j\) is the scaling dimension of \(\Phi_j\). Although we are interested in relevant perturbations with \(\Delta_j<d\), these will in general lead to a finite number of primitive UV divergences up to some finite order in the couplings (as for a super-renormalizable deformation of a free theory), in particular in the ground state energy which we are trying to approximate. These divergences may be subtracted by adding a finite number of counter-terms to \(\hat H\) determined the OPEs of the \(\{\Phi_j\}\). We assume this has been done. For example, if \(2\Delta_j\geq d\) there is a UV divergence in the ground state energy at \(O(\lambda_j^2)\). This is subtracted by a term in \(\hat H\) proportional to the unit operator. This does not affect the variational procedure in general. The case \(2\Delta_j=d\) is special and leads to a logarithmic anomaly in the energy. This will be discussed for the 2d Ising model in Sec. [3.1.1](#seclog){reference-type="ref" reference="seclog"}. Conformal boundary states \(|\cal B\rangle\) are defined by the condition [\[T0k\]]{#T0k label="T0k"} T\_0k(x)\|B ,(k=1,...,D) , where \(\hat T_{ij}\) is the energy-momentum tensor of the CFT. That is, they are annihilated by the momentum density operator, and so are invariant under local time reparametrizations. (For boundaries with a space-like normal there is no energy flow across the boundary.) Although in higher dimensions these states, and their classification, are poorly understood except for free or weakly coupled CFTs, in 2d much more is known. The Hilbert space is acted on by two copies \(({\cal V}\otimes\overline{\cal V})\) of the Virasoro algebra, generated by L_n=L2e\^2nix/L T(x)dx ,\_n=L2e\^-2nix/L (x)dx , where, as usual, \(T\equiv T_{zz}=-T_{00}+T_{11}-2iT_{01}\) and \(\overline T\equiv T_{\bar z\bar z}=-T_{00}+T_{01}+2iT_{01}\), in euclidean signature. It is spanned by states \(|i,N\rangle\otimes\overline{|i',N'\rangle}\), where \(N\) labels the states of a module of \(\cal V\) with highest weight state labelled by \(i\), and similarly for \(\overline{\cal V}\). For CFTs with central charge \(c\geq1\), this is a Virasoro module, while for the minimal models with \(c<1\) it is a Kac module with the null states projected out. The condition ([\[T0k\]](#T0k){reference-type="ref" reference="T0k"}) then corresponds to (T(x)-(x))\|ḂIn terms of the Virasoro generators this becomes (L_n-\_-n)\|B , whose solution is the span of the Ishibashi states [\[Ishi\]]{#Ishi label="Ishi"} \|i=\_N\|i,N , where the sum is over all the orthonormalized states in the module. However, the Ishibashi states are not physical, in the sense that, when they are chosen as boundary states on the opposite edges \(x_0=\pm\tau\) of an annulus, the partition function \(Z={\rm Tr}\,e^{-L\hat H'}\) evaluated in terms of the generator \(\hat H'\) of translations around the annulus does not have the form of a sum over eigenstates with non-negative integer coefficients, as it must if periodic spatial boundary conditions are imposed. For the diagonal minimal \(A_m\) models, the physical states which do have this property are linear combinations of the Ishibashi states [\[phys\]]{#phys label="phys"} \|a=\_j \|i , where \(S^i_k\) is the matrix by which the Virasoro characters transform under modular transformations. The multiplicities of the eigenstates \(j\) of \(\hat H'\) which do propagate are then given by the fusion rule coefficients \(N^j_{ab}\). In particular the vacuum state propagates only if \(a=b\), that is \(N^0_{ab}=\delta_{ab}\). While similar results are available for the non-diagonal minimal models, wider results for general CFTs are not available, which is why we mainly restrict to the \(A_m\) models in explicit calculations. In higher dimensions, the boundary states satisfying ([\[T0k\]](#T0k){reference-type="ref" reference="T0k"}) also form a linear space, and we assume that the physical states may be identified analogously. Consider the partition function in the slab \({\mathbb T}^D\times\{-\tau,\tau\}\) (where \({\mathbb T}^D\) is a \(D\)-dimensional torus of volume \(L^D\)) with boundary states \(|a\rangle\), \(|b\rangle\) at \(x_0=\pm\tau\): Z\_ab=b\|e\^-2H\_CFT\|a , (where \(\hat H_{CFT}\) is the generator of translations in \(x_0\)) and, similarly to the 2d case, demand that when evaluated by quantizing in one of the spatial directions, it has the form of a trace over intermediate states whose energies all scale like \(\tau^{-1}\). However this is difficult to implement since this spectrum on the torus is not related to the conformal spectrum for \(d>2\). In fact, we shall need only a weaker condition: that physical states \(\{a,b,\ldots\}\) should satisfy [\[gap\]]{#gap label="gap"} Z\_ab/(Z\_aaZ\_bb)\^1/2=O(e\^-const.(L/2)\^D)for \(L/\tau\to\infty\)̇This may be understood as follows: when the boundary conditions are the same, we expect that Z\_aa\~e\^\_a(L/2)\^D , where the exponent is (minus) the Casimir energy of a system between two identical plates. In this geometry this is always attractive, thus \(\sigma_a>0\). It must scale as \(L^D\), and, since the boundary conditions and the bulk theory are scale-invariant, also as \(\tau_a^{-D}\). The quantity \(-\sigma_a L^{D-1}/(2\tau)^D\) is the ground state energy of the generator of translations around one of the spatial cycles of the torus. On the other hand the exponent on the right hand side of ([\[gap\]](#gap){reference-type="ref" reference="gap"}) is the gap to the lowest-energy state in the sector with \(ab\) boundary conditions. It is the interfacial energy from the point of view of \(d\)-dimensional classical statistical mechanics. Thus the physical boundary states may in principle be determined by diagonalizing the partition functions in the slab in the limit \(L\gg\tau\). We assume that this has been done. As discussed in the introduction, we use as variational states for the ground state of the perturbed hamiltonian ([\[Hp\]](#Hp){reference-type="ref" reference="Hp"}), the ansatz \|{\_a},{\_a}=\_a_a e\^-\_aH\_CFT\|ȧWe first discuss the inner product of these states a\|e\^-\_aH\_CFTe\^-\_bH\_CFT\|ḃThis is the partition function \(Z_{ab}\) in slab of width \(\tau_a+\tau_b\) with boundary conditions \(a,b\) on opposite faces. As discussed above, for physical boundary states in the limit \(L\gg\tau_a+\tau_b\) [\[Zab\]]{#Zab label="Zab"} Z\_ab\~\_ab e\^\_a(L/(2_a))\^ḊThe matrix elements of the unperturbed hamiltonian \(\hat H_{CFT}\) are, for the same reason, diagonal in this basis as long as \(L\gg\tau_{a,b}\), and may be found by differentiating ([\[Zab\]](#Zab){reference-type="ref" reference="Zab"}) a\|H\_CFT e\^-2_aH\_CFT\|a\~\_ab e\^\_a(L/(2_a))\^ḊFinally we need the matrix elements of the perturbation a\|e\^-\_aH\_CFT \_j(x) e\^-\_bH\_CFT\|b , which is a one-point function in the slab. Once again, if we evaluate this by inserting a complete set of eigenstates of a generator of translations around the torus, this is dominated by its ground state if \(L\gg\tau_{a,b}\), but this contributes only if \(a=b\). So the perturbation is also diagonal in the basis of physical states (but not in the Ishibashi basis: see Sec. [3.3](#sec33){reference-type="ref" reference="sec33"}). When \(a=b\) the one-point functions in the mid-plane of the slab have the form \_j(x)= , where the amplitudes \(A_a^j\) are universal given the normalization ([\[norm\]](#norm){reference-type="ref" reference="norm"}) of the operator. Since the perturbed hamiltonian is diagonal in the physical basis of variational states, the problem becomes much simpler: for each \(a\) we should minimize the variational energy per unit volume [\[Ea\]]{#Ea label="Ea"} E_a=+\_j_j , with respect to \(\tau_a\), and then choose the \(a\) which gives the absolute minimum. Note that having found this minimum \(a\) for a particular set of couplings \(\{\lambda_j\}\), since \(E_a\) transforms multiplicatively under \_je\^(D+1-\_j)\_j ,\_ae\^-\_a ,E_ae\^(D+1)E_a , the absolute minimum will occur for the same value of \(a\) along an RG trajectory. This is reassuring, since each point on the trajectory should be described by the same massive QFT up to a rescaling of the mass, which is proportional to \(1/\tau_a^{\rm min}\). Since the \(\{\Phi_j\}\) are relevant, \(\Delta_j<D+1\), so that the behavior of \(E_a\) as \(\tau_a\to0\) (but still \(\gg\epsilon\)) is dominated by the first term and is positive if \(\sigma_a>0\) (which corresponds to the physically reasonable case of an attractive Casimir force.) As \(\tau_a\to\infty\) it approaches zero, dominated by the term with smallest \(\Delta_j\) and \(\lambda_j\not=0\). If the sign is negative this implies that \(E_a\) has a negative minimum at some finite value of \(\tau_a\). At least for the 2d minimal models we can show that there is always some \(a\) for which \(\lambda_jA_a^j<0\), so this minimum always exists.
## Trace of the energy-momentum tensor.
We may infer a general result about the trace \(\langle\Theta\rangle=\langle T^i_i\rangle\) of the energy-momentum tensor in the perturbed theory as approximated by this method. For given set of relevant perturbations \(\{\lambda_j\}\) this is given by the response of the action to a scale transformation (x)=-\_j(D+1-\_j)\_j_j(x)̇Differentiating ([\[Ea\]](#Ea){reference-type="ref" reference="Ea"}) we see that at the minimum +\_j_j\_j_j , and so E=-(D+1)\^-1\_j_j\_j_j+\_j_j\_j=-(D+1)\^-1̇Once again, this is reassuring, as we expect that in the ground state of a relativistic theory \(\langle T_{00}\rangle=-\langle T_{kk}\rangle\) for \(k\not=0\), and so =-T\_00+\_k=1\^DT\_kk=-(D+1)T\_00=-(D+1)ĖThe variational method therefore gives a lower bound on \(\langle\Theta\rangle\).
# 2d minimal models {#sec3}
We now specialize to the case of the 2d \(A_m\) minimal models. In 2d, the Casimir amplitude \(\sigma_a=\pi c/24\), independent of \(a\), where \(c\) is the central charge. When \(a=b\) the expectation values of the one-point functions in a long strip of width \(2\tau_a\) may be found by a conformal mapping from the half-plane to have the form [\[strip\]]{#strip label="strip"} \_j(x,)\_ = , where the amplitude governs the behavior of the one-point function in the upper half-plane \(y>0\) with boundary condition \(a\) on the real axis: \_j(y)\_=̇In ([\[strip\]](#strip){reference-type="ref" reference="strip"}) we should set \(\tau=\tau_a\), whence we read off that \(A_a^j=\pi^{\Delta_j}\widetilde A_a^j\). If the operator \(\Phi_j\) has its standard CFT normalization ([\[norm\]](#norm){reference-type="ref" reference="norm"}), the amplitudes \(\widetilde A_a^j\) are universal. In they were computed in terms of the overlap between the boundary state \(|a\rangle\) and the highest weight state \(|j\rangle\) corresponding to the primary operator \(\Phi_j\): A\^j_a=̇This follows by conformally mapping the upper half plane to a semi-infinite cylinder \(x>0\) with a boundary condition \(a\) at \(x=0\), and comparing the result for \(x\to\infty\) with the result of inserting a complete set of eigenstates of the generator of translations along the cylinder. For the \(A_m\) minimal models, inserting the expression ([\[phys\]](#phys){reference-type="ref" reference="phys"}) for \(|a\rangle\) we then find [\[At\]]{#At label="At"} A\^j_a=()\^1/2̇To summarize, the variational energy ([\[Ea\]](#Ea){reference-type="ref" reference="Ea"}) in this case is given by E_a=+\_j_j()\^1/2̇It is useful to rescale the couplings by positive constants \(\tilde\lambda_j=\pi^{\Delta_j}(S_0^0/S^j_0)^{1/2}\lambda_j\) so that this simplifies to E_a=+\_j̇Note that that sum over \(j\) excludes \(j=0\) which corresponds to adding the unit operator and therefore a constant shift in the energy. There are two general statements which follow from the fact that \(S\) is a symmetric orthogonal matrix, and that the elements \(S_0^j\) are all positive. First, since all its rows are orthogonal and non-zero it follows that, for \(j\not=0\), some of the elements \(S_a^j\) are positive and some negative. Therefore, if \({j^*}\) corresponds to the smallest value of \(\Delta_j\) such that \(\lambda_j\not=0\), and therefore dominates the behavior of \(E_a\) as \(\tau_a\to\infty\), no matter what the sign of \(\lambda_{j^*}\) we may always find at least one \(a\) such that \(\lambda_{j^*}S_a^j<0\), and so \(E_a\) approaches zero from below. Since \(E_a\to+\infty\) as \(\tau_a\to0\), this implies that, for these \(a\), \(E_a\) has a negative minimum at finite \(\tau_a\), corresponding to a finite correlation length. This rules out the possibility that this variational ansatz can describe massless flows to another non-trivial CFT. Second, we may ask whether there is a combination of couplings \(\{\lambda_j\}\) which will lead to a prescribed \(b\) as overall minimum. The answer is affirmative. For, suppose we choose [\[combo\]]{#combo label="combo"} \_j=-g(2)\^\_j-2 S\^j_b , where \(g\) is a positive constant and \(\mu\) is some fixed scale \(>\epsilon\). Then the second term in ([\[Ea\]](#Ea){reference-type="ref" reference="Ea"}) is, when \(\tau_a=\mu\), -gS\^0_a\^2\_jS\^j_aS\^j_b=-gS\^0_a\^2(\_ab-S_a\^0S_b\^0)̇Since \(0<S^0_a<1\), this is \(<0\) if \(a=b\) and \(>0\) otherwise. Thus, at this scale, the boundary state \(b\) will correspond to the lowest trial energy[^2]. Note that ([\[combo\]](#combo){reference-type="ref" reference="combo"}) implies including some irrelevant couplings in the mix of deformations. Further results depend on the detailed form of the modular \(S\)-matrix for the \(A_m\) models. In particular, we may ask what happens if a single \(\lambda_j\) is non-zero. Depending on whether \(\lambda_j>0\) or \(<0\), we have to determine which value of \(a\) minimizes (maximizes) the ratio \(S^j_a/S^0_a\). Label the positions of the bulk operators in the Kac table by \(j=(r,s)\), with \(1\leq r\leq m-1\) and \(1\leq s\leq m\), and \((r,s)\) identified with \((m-r,m+1-s)\). The label \(j=0\) corresponds to \((r,s)=(1,1)\)). Similarly label the boundary states \(a\) by \((\alpha,\beta)\). The \(A_m\) minimal series of CFTs is conjectured to be the scaling limit of the critical lattice RSOS \(A_m\) models. These models are defined on a square lattice. At each node \(R\) there is an integer-valued height variable \(h(R)\) satisfying \(1\leq h(R)\leq m\), with the RSOS constraint that \(|h(R)-h(R')|=1\) if \(R\) and \(R'\) are nearest neighbors. The heights may be thought of as living at the nodes of the Dynkin diagram \(A_m\), so each configuration is a many-to-one embedding of the diagram into the square lattice. The critical Boltzmann weights of the lattice model are specified in terms of the elements \(s_h^0(m)\) of the Perron-Frobenius eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix of \(A_m\). The general eigenvector has the form s_h\^j(m)̇The microscopic interpretation of the conformal boundary states ([\[phys\]](#phys){reference-type="ref" reference="phys"}) for these models has been given in . The simplest boundary states are when the boundary lies at 45\(^{\circ}\) to the principal lattice vectors, and the heights on the boundary are all fixed to the same particular value \(h\), say. These have been identified with the conformal boundary conditions with the Kac labels \((\alpha,\beta)=(1,h)\). The second simplest type of microscopic boundary condition is when the boundary heights are fixed to \(h\) and on the neighboring diagonal they are fixed to \(h+1\). These have been identified with \((\alpha,\beta)=(h,1)\). In a complete set of microscopic boundary conditions was identified for each Kac label \((\alpha,\beta)\) but these become increasingly complicated. In general the microscopic boundary states corresponding to labels near the center of the Kac table are increasingly disordered. The ratios of elements of the modular \(S\)-matrix for the diagonal \(A_m\) models are [\[ratio\]]{#ratio label="ratio"} = =(-1)\^(r+s)(+) =(-1)\^(r+s)(+) ̇Locating the global maximum and minimum of this expression for general \((r,s)\) is simplified by the fact that, for fixed \((r,s)\), it factorizes into expressions depending only on \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) respectively. Thus we can restrict to the four possible products of the maximum and minimum of each factor, and compare these values. In each factor the numerator is an oscillating function which is modulated by the positive denominator, which itself has minima at \(\alpha=1,m-1\) (and \(\beta=1,m\)), which for the lattice \(A_m\) models correspond to the most ordered states. The most relevant bulk operator corresponds to \((r,s)=(2,2)\), when ([\[ratio\]](#ratio){reference-type="ref" reference="ratio"}) becomes ṁThe extrema of each factor are at \(\alpha=1, m-1\) and \(\beta=1,m\). Thus for \(\lambda_{2,2}>0\) the minimum energy corresponds to \((\alpha,\beta)=(1,m)=(m-1,1)\), and, for \(\lambda_{2,2}<0\), \((\alpha,\beta)=(1,1)=(m-1,m)\). These correspond to the most ordered states, at the ends of the Dynkin diagram. This is to be expected as, in the Landau-Ginzburg correspondence, \(\Phi_{2,2}\) is the most relevant Z\(_2\) symmetry breaking operator. Similarly, the most relevant Z\(_2\) even operator is \(\Phi_{3,3}\), when ([\[ratio\]](#ratio){reference-type="ref" reference="ratio"}) becomes (2m+1)(2+1)̇If \(m\) is even, the first factor varies between \(2\cos\frac{2\pi}m+1\) at \(\alpha=1,m-1\), and \(-1\) at \(\alpha=\frac12m\), and the second factor varies between \(2\cos\frac{2\pi}{m+1}+1\) at \(\beta=1,m\), and \(2\cos\frac{\pi m}{m+1}+1\) at \(\beta=\frac12m, \frac12m+1\). Thus for \(\lambda_{3,3}<0\) there are degenerate minima for \((\alpha,\beta)=(1,1)=(m-1,m)\) and \((\alpha,\beta)=(1,m)=(m-1,1)\) (the most ordered states, which break the Z\(_2\) symmetry.). On the other hand for \(\lambda_{3,3}>0\) we need to compare the quantities (-1)(2+1) , (2+1)(2m+1)̇Numerically, the first is more negative, so the minimum energy in this case corresponds to \(\alpha=\frac12m\), \(\beta=1,m\). These are Z\(_2\)-symmetric states. For odd \(m\) the same story holds, with \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) interchanged. Another interesting special case is \(\Phi_{1,3}\). This is a perturbation which, with the correct sign, is supposed to flow to the \(A_{m-1}\) minimal CFT, and for the other sign to a state with large degeneracy. As we have seen, such massless flows cannot be accounted for within this set of trial states. In this case ([\[ratio\]](#ratio){reference-type="ref" reference="ratio"}) simplifies to +1 , independent of \(\alpha\). Depending on the sign of the coupling, this picks out the boundary states either with \(\beta=1,m\) or with \(\beta\approx\frac12m\). In both cases, however, there is an \((m-1)\)-fold degeneracy of candidate ground states. This reflects a flow towards a true first-order transition, as expected for one sign of the coupling, or the best attempt of this approximation to reproduce the critical point of the \(A_{m-1}\) model, as expected for the other sign. This is an important check on the effectiveness of our approach. These somewhat cryptic general remarks are best illustrated with some simple examples.
## The Ising model.
This corresponds to \(A_3\). The perturbed hamiltonian is [\[HIsing\]]{#HIsing label="HIsing"} H=H\_CFT+tdx+hdx , where \(\varepsilon=\Phi_{2,1}=\Phi_{1,3}\) and \(\sigma=\Phi_{1,2}=\Phi_{2,2}\) are the energy density and magnetization operators respectively. In this case, the bulk operators are \(\{\Phi_j\}=(1,\epsilon,\sigma)\), and the boundary states in the same labeling are \((+,-,f)\), corresponding to fixed\((+)\), fixed\((-)\) and free boundary conditions on the Ising spins. The \(S\)-matrix in this ordering of the basis is S=(
)̇After rescaling the couplings as above, we find that \[\begin{aligned}
E_+&=&\frac\pi{48(2\tau_+)^2}+\frac t{2\tau_+}+\sqrt2\frac h{(2\tau_+)^{1/8}}\,,\label{Eaa}\\ E_-&=&\frac\pi{48(2\tau_-)^2}+\frac t{2\tau_-}-\sqrt2\frac h{(2\tau_-)^{1/8}}\,,\label{E2a}\\ E_f&=&\frac\pi{48(2\tau_f)^2}-\frac t{2\tau_f}\.\label{Ef} \end{aligned}\] For \(h=0\), \(t>0\), corresponding to the disordered state, it is clear that the minimizer is \(E_f\). For the opposite sign of \(t\) with \(h>0\), the minimizer is \(E_-\), corresponding to negative magnetization (recall the definition of the sign of the couplings in ([\[HIsing\]](#HIsing){reference-type="ref" reference="HIsing"})), and vice versa. As \(h\to0\) from either side with \(t<0\), we remain in one or the other of these states, corresponding to spontaneous symmetry breaking. However, for \(t>0\) and \(0<h\ll t^{15/8}\) there is a problem. The minimum of \(E_-\) is found by balancing the last two terms in ([\[E2a\]](#E2a){reference-type="ref" reference="E2a"}), and therefore occurs when \(\tau_-=O((t/h)^{7/8})\) at a value \(E_-=-O(h^{8/7}/t^{1/7})\). On the other hand the minimum of \(E_f=-O(t^2)\) is much lower in this limit. This would suggest, incorrectly, that the magnetization is zero in the ground state. As we increase the ratio \(h/t^{15/8}\), eventually these levels cross, but there is no reason for \(\tau_-\) and \(\tau_f\) to be equal at this point. This appears to be an inherent problem of using a variational ansatz which is not sufficiently complex. It could presumably be overcome by using a trial state of the form e\^-H\_CFT e\^-h_s\_s dx \|f , where \(\hat\sigma_s\) is the boundary magnetization coupling to a boundary magnetic field \(h_s\), at the cost of loss of analytic tractability.
### Logarithmic anomaly. {#seclog}
When \(h=0\) it follows from ([\[Eaa\]](#Eaa){reference-type="ref" reference="Eaa"},[\[E2a\]](#E2a){reference-type="ref" reference="E2a"},[\[Ef\]](#Ef){reference-type="ref" reference="Ef"}) that the minimum energy scales like \(t^2\). Yet it has been known since Onsager that the correct behavior is \(t^2\log t\). The origin of this logarithmic anomaly is a cancellation between the scaling term \(t^{2/(2-\Delta_\varepsilon)}\) and the analytic background \(\propto t^2\), both of which occur with amplitudes which diverge as \(\Delta_\varepsilon\to1\). This may be accounted for within the variational approach by adding a counter-term as before, proportional to the space-time integral of the 2-point function, which will now also have a logarithmic dependence on the IR cutoff \(\tau\). Thus, for example, ([\[Ef\]](#Ef){reference-type="ref" reference="Ef"}) becomes E_f=-t2_f-At\^2(\_f/) , where \(\epsilon\) is the short-distance cutoff and \(A\) is a (calculable) \(O(1)\) constant. The minimum still occurs at \(\tau_f\sim t^{-1}\), but the last term now contributes the desired logarithm at the minimum.
## The tricritical Ising model.
This corresponds to the \(A_4\) lattice model with heights \(h(R)\in\{1,2,3,4\}\). The RSOS condition means that \(h\) is even on even sites odd \(s\) on odd sites, or vice versa. In the Landau-Ginzburg picture it corresponds to a scalar field \(\phi\) with a \(\phi^6\) interaction, and a Z\(_2\) symmetry under \(\phi\to-\phi\). Note that in the lattice model this Z\(_2\) symmetry is implemented by reflecting the Dynkin diagram *and *a sublattice shift. The Kac table with bulk operators labelled by Landau-Ginzburg is shown in Fig. 2. Note that odd \(r\) is Z\(_2\) odd and vice versa. However another model in the same universality class is the spin-1 (Blume-Capel) Ising model, which may be thought of as an Ising model with vacancies. The usually accepted phase diagram and RG flows of the tricritical Ising model near the tricritical fixed point are quite complex. (See for example Fig. 4.2 of.) In the Z\(_2\)-even sector, turning on the most relevant operator \(\Phi_{3,3}\sim\phi^2\) gives flows either to the high-temperature disordered phase, or to the 2 coexisting low-temperature ordered phases. Turning on the \(\Phi_{1,3}\sim\phi^4\) operator gives flows either to a first-order transition between these ordered phases and a disordered phase with vacancies, or to the \(A_3\) Ising fixed point. As for the Ising model, turning on the \(\Phi_{2,2}\sim\phi\) operator leads to broken-symmetry phases. However, at low temperatures there may be coexistence between two such phases with different densities of vacancies. These persist to finite temperature, giving 'wings' in the phase diagram which end in lines of Ising-like transitions. These lines meet in the tricritical point and correspond to flows generated by the non-leading but relevant Z\(_2\)-odd operator \(\Phi_{2,1}\sim\phi^3\). According to Behrend and Pearce, the labelling of the boundary states in the \(A_4\) lattice model is as shown in Fig. 3. On the same diagram we have indicated their interpretation in the Blume-Capel model, due to Chim and Affleck, which is perhaps more intuitive. Here \((\pm)\) label totally ordered states, \((0)\) is a vacancy-rich state, and \((0\pm)\) are partially ordered states. \((d)\) is a multicritical point separating these in the boundary RG flows. Note that the \(\alpha=2\) states are Z\(_2\) even while the Z\(_2\) symmetry interchanges \(\alpha=1\) and \(\alpha=3\) (keeping \(\beta\) the same.) Let us see how well the variational approach reproduces this picture. According to the earlier analysis, turning on the \(\Phi_{2,2}\) operator corresponds to the boundary states at the corners of the Kac table in Fig. [\[A4\]](#A4){reference-type="ref" reference="A4"}. These are the most ordered states. Again, turning on the \(\Phi_{3,3}\) perturbation corresponds to the boundary states which extremize \(\big(2\cos(\pi\alpha/2)+1\big)\big(2\cos(2\pi\beta/5)+1\big)\). This gives \(\beta=1,4\), and, depending on the sign of the coupling, either \(\alpha=2\) or \(\alpha=1,4\). These correspond to the disordered and ordered Ising-like phases, respectively, as expected. Turning on \(\Phi_{1,3}\) corresponds to maximizing only the second factor \(\big(2\cos(2\pi\beta/5)+1\big)\), and so, depending on the sign of the coupling gives either \(\beta=1,4\), corresponding to coexistence between these Ising-like phases (instead of a second order critical point as it should), or \(\beta=2,3\) coexistence between partially ordered phases and a disordered, vacancy-rich phase. Turning on \(\Phi_{2,1}\), on the other hand, corresponds to extremizing \((-1)^{\alpha+\beta}\cos(\pi\alpha/4)\). For one sign of the coupling we get coexistence between the strongly ordered phase \((-)=(1,2,1,2)\) and the partially ordered phase \((0+)=(3,2/4,3,2/4)\), and for the other sign we get coexistence between their Z\(_2\) partners. This is once again in general agreement with the wings of the phase diagram, except that the approximation suggests a first-order rather than an Ising-like continuous transition. We conclude that for this model the boundary states roughly reproduce the expected RG flows when a single relevant operator is turned on, with the exception that flows to non-trivial CFTs are approximated by first-order rather than continuous transitions.**
## Matrix elements between Ishibashi states and the fusion rules. {#sec33}
As an aside, we mention a curiosity which follows from the result ([\[At\]](#At){reference-type="ref" reference="At"}) for the matrix element of a bulk primary field between physical states in the limit \(L\to\infty\): a\|e\^-H\_je\^-H\|b=\_ab()\^\_j ()\^1/2 and the definition of these states in terms of the Ishibashi states ([\[phys\]](#phys){reference-type="ref" reference="phys"}), which, on inverting becomes: \|i=\_aS\^i_a(S\^i_0)\^1/2 \|ȧHence i\|e\^-H\_je\^-H\|k= ()\^\_j()\^1/2(S\^i_0)\^1/2(S\^k_0)\^1/2 \_ȧWe recognize the sum over \(a\) as the Verlinde formula for the fusion rule coefficient \(N_{ijk}\). Taking into account the normalization of the states, we have [\[fusion\]]{#fusion label="fusion"} (i\|e\^-2H\|ik\|e\^-2H\|k)\^1/2 =()\^\_j()\^1/2 N\_ijk̇Note that the first factor could be absorbed into a redefinition of the normalization of \(\hat\Phi_j\). This result is somewhat surprising, and, to our knowledge, has not been noticed before. If we insert the definition ([\[Ishi\]](#Ishi){reference-type="ref" reference="Ishi"}) of the Ishibashi states into the numerator, the leading term for \(\tau\gg L\) is proportional to the OPE coefficient \(c_{ijk}\), which certainly vanishes whenever \(N_{ijk}\) does. The contributions of all the descendent states are all proportional to \(c_{ijk}\), with coefficients which could, in principle, be computed from the Virasoro algebra. However, it is remarkable that they all conspire to sum to the integer-valued fusion rule coefficient \(N_{ijk}\). If there were an independent way of establishing ([\[fusion\]](#fusion){reference-type="ref" reference="fusion"}) this would give an alternative derivation of the Verlinde formula. It would be interesting to see whether this result extends to non-diagonal minimal models and to other rational CFTs. Although it has been derived here only for the Virasoro minimal models, there seems to be no obstacle in principle to its generalization to other rational CFTs, and it then suggests that the 1-point functions of bulk fields between suitable boundary states are determined by purely topological data of the fusion algebra. It also gives a possible way to *define *(at least ratios of) the fusion rules for non-rational CFTs.**
# Conclusion. {#sec4}
We have proposed using smeared boundary states as trial variational states for massive deformations of CFTs. This is motivated by the uses of these states in quantum quenches and entanglement studies. In the case of the 2d minimal models we can perform explicit calculations which show this method gives a qualitative picture of the phase diagram in the vicinity of the CFT. Its main failing is that it cannot correctly predict a flow to a non-trivial CFT. In this case it appears to suggest phase coexistence rather than a continuous transition. In addition, the boundaries between different states corresponding to different renormalization group sinks are always first-order transitions. This is a necessary consequence of the variational method. However the method, by its nature, always gives the correct scaling of the energy with the coupling constants. From a numerical point of view it cannot be competitive with earlier methods such as the truncated conformal space approach, but it is much simpler and moreover gives new insight into the physical relationship between conformal boundary states and ground states of gapped theories. Since it gives a bound on the universal term in the free energy, it would be interesting to make a detailed comparison with exact results available for integrable perturbations. | {'timestamp': '2017-07-31T02:01:24', 'yymm': '1706', 'arxiv_id': '1706.01568', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01568'} |
Subsets and Splits