Datasets:

kilian-group
/

arxiv-classifier

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Subset (4)

default · ~99.6k rows (showing the first 120k)

Split (2)

train · ~72.4k rows (showing the first 93.1k)

paper_id stringlengths 9 16	version stringclasses 26 values	yymm stringclasses 311 values	created timestamp[s]	title stringlengths 6 335	secondary_subfield sequencelengths 1 8	abstract stringlengths 25 3.93k	primary_subfield stringclasses 124 values	field stringclasses 20 values	fulltext stringlengths 0 2.84M
1805.07415	1	1805	2018-05-18T19:44:56	Effects of dissociation/recombination on the day-night temperature contrasts of ultra-hot Jupiters	[ "astro-ph.EP", "physics.ao-ph" ]	Secondary eclipse observations of ultra-hot Jupiters have found evidence that hydrogen is dissociated on their daysides. Additionally, full-phase light curve observations of ultra-hot Jupiters show a smaller day-night emitted flux contrast than that expected from previous theory. Recently, it was proposed by Bell & Cowan (2018) that the heat intake to dissociate hydrogen and heat release due to recombination of dissociated hydrogen can affect the atmospheric circulation of ultra-hot Jupiters. In this work, we add cooling/heating due to dissociation/recombination into the analytic theory of Komacek & Showman (2016) and Zhang & Showman (2017) for the dayside-nightside temperature contrasts of hot Jupiters. We find that at high values of incident stellar flux, the day-night temperature contrast of ultra-hot Jupiters may decrease with increasing incident stellar flux due to dissociation/recombination, the opposite of that expected without including the effects of dissociation/recombination. We propose that a combination of a greater number of full-phase light curve observations of ultra-hot Jupiters and future General Circulation Models that include the effects of dissociation/recombination could determine in detail how the atmospheric circulation of ultra-hot Jupiters differs from that of cooler planets.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version May 22, 2018 Typeset using LATEX RNAAS style in AASTeX62 8 1 0 2 y a M 8 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 5 1 4 7 0 . 5 0 8 1 : v i X r a Effects of dissociation/recombination on the day-night temperature contrasts of ultra-hot Jupiters Thaddeus D. Komacek1 and Xianyu Tan1 1Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721 [email protected] Keywords: methods: analytical - planets and satellites: atmospheres MAIN BODY Recent observations of ultra-hot Jupiters have revealed new physical processes at play that do not occur in the atmospheres of cooler planets. Secondary eclipse observations (Arcangeli et al. 2018; Kreidberg et al. 2018; Mansfield et al. 2018) have found spectra that appear featureless throughout the 1.1 − 1.7µm region, likely caused by the continuum opacity due to dissociated hydrogen (Bell et al. 2017; Lothringer et al. 2018; Parmentier et al. 2018). Recently, it was shown by Bell & Cowan (2018) that when atomic hydrogen is transported from the hot dayside to the relatively cold nightside of these planets, recombination of atomic H into H2 releases a significant amount of heat that can warm up the nightside of the planet. Interestingly, recent phase curve observations of the ultra-hot Jupiters WASP-103b (Kreidberg et al. 2018) and WASP-33b (Zhang et al. 2018) showed relatively small amplitudes, indicative of processes reducing their day-night temperature contrast. In this work, we predict the day-night temperature differences of ultra-hot Jupiters using an analytic theory updated from that developed in Komacek & Showman (2016); Zhang & Showman (2017); Komacek et al. (2017). This theory scales the primitive equations of meteorology to solve for characteristic day-night temperature contrasts in hot Jupiter atmospheres. We include the effects of hydrogen dissociation/recombination, including cooling/heating and the change in mean molecular weight. Specifically, we add the following energy source to the scaled thermodynamic energy equation (Equation 24 in Komacek & Showman 2016): Qrecomb cp = U qbondηH (T ) cp(T )a , (1) where U is the wind speed (solved for consistently using the scaled momentum equation), a is the planetary radius, qbond = 2.14 × 108 J kg −1 is the hydrogen dissociation energy (Bell & Cowan 2018), ηH (T ) is the mass mixing ratio of atomic hydrogen calculated from the molar mixing ratio χH (given by the approximation in Equation 5 of Bell & Cowan 2018) as ηH = χH /(2 − χH ), and cp(T ) is the specific heat capacity of the combined hydrogen molecular and atomic gas mixture. Additionally, hydrogen dissociation decreases the day-side mean molecular weight, which increases the day-night pressure gradient. We include this effect by modifying the horizontal geopotential difference to take into account the difference between the dayside specific gas constant Rday(T ) = R0(1 + ηH (T )) and the nightside gas constant Rnight = R0, where R0 is the gas constant of H2. As in Komacek et al. (2017), we solve for the dayside-nightside temperature difference as a function of its two incident stellar flux and frictional drag timescale. Figure 1 shows our predictions for the key control parameters: day-night brightness temperature difference, A = (Tb,day − Tb,night)/Tb,day, both including and ignoring the effects of dissociation/recombination. Dissociation and recombination cause the day-night temperature contrast to decrease in the ultra-hot Jupiter regime, in contrast to the case ignoring this effect that shows the opposite trend. Note that for even hotter planets than that considered here (e.g., KELT-9b), the nightside may begin to be partially dissociated, potentially breaking our theoretical assumption that the nightside is constituted of purely molecular hydrogen. We also show observations of the phase curve amplitude in Figure 1, updated from Komacek et al. (2017) to include WASP-33b and WASP-103b. These two phase curve observations do not show evidence for an increase in phase curve amplitude at high temperatures. We find that hydrogen dissociation/recombination provides a mechanism to explain the relatively small observed phase curve amplitudes of these ultra-hot Jupiters, as predicted by Bell & Cowan (2018). 2 Komacek & Tan Figure 1. Theoretically predicted dayside-nightside temperature contrast at a pressure of 100 mbars for a planet with the radius, gravity, and rotation rate of HD 209458b (lines, dotted lines do not include dissociation/recombination) and observations (points, lines without a point show lower limits), plotted as a function of equilibrium temperature. This theory provides a basic estimate for how dissociation/recombination of hydrogen affects the day-night tem- perature contrasts of ultra-hot Jupiters as a function of planetary parameters. However, it does not provide details about the feedback of dissociation/recombination on dynamics, which is crucial for interpreting observed phase curves. Dissociation of hydrogen on the dayside should cause a strong cooling effect that could affect dynamics near the sub- stellar point. Additionally, because the hydrogen recombination timescales in hot Jupiter atmospheres are extremely short (Parmentier et al. 2018), the majority of recombination might occur in localized regions with large temperature contrasts (e.g., the limb). As a result, the recombination heating may occur at the limb rather than throughout the nightside as assumed here. Dynamics could then transport heat from the limb toward the nightside of the planet. General Circulation Models that include the effects of hydrogen dissociation/recombination can test our theory, and would provide more detailed comparisons to phase curve observations of ultra-hot Jupiters. We thank Nick Cowan and Taylor Bell for a careful reading of the manuscript and Josh Lothringer for helpful discussions. 10001500200025003000Equilibrium temperature0.00.20.40.60.81.0Normalized day-night temperature contrastdrag=drag=104 sNo dissociation3.6m4.5m8m24mWFC3REFERENCES 3 Arcangeli, J. et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Komacek, T., Showman, A., & Tan, X. 2017, The Letters, 855, L30 Bell, T.J. et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 847, L2 Bell, T.J. & Cowan, N.B. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 857, L20 Komacek, T. & Showman, A. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 821, 16 Astrophysical Journal, 835, 198 Kreidberg, L. et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints:1805.00029 Lothringer, J.D., Barman T., & Koskinen T. 2018, arXiv e-prints:1805.0038 Mansfield, M. et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints:1805.00424 Parmentier, V. et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints:1805.00096 Zhang, M. et al. 2018, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 83 Zhang, X. & Showman, A. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 836, 73
1612.06920	1	1612	2016-12-20T23:27:13	Non-Gravitational Acceleration of the Active Asteroids	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Comets can exhibit non-gravitational accelerations caused by recoil forces due to anisotropic mass loss. So might active asteroids. We present an astrometric investigation of 18 active asteroids in search of non-gravitational acceleration. Statistically significant (signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) $> 3$) detections are obtained in three objects: 313P/Gibbs, 324P/La Sagra and (3200) Phaethon. The strongest and most convincing detection ($>$7$\sigma$ in each of three orthogonal components of the acceleration), is for the $\sim$1 km diameter nucleus of 324P/La Sagra. A 4.5$\sigma$ detection of the transverse component of the acceleration of 313P/Gibbs (also $\sim$1 km in diameter) is likely genuine too, as evidenced by the stability of the solution to the rejection or inclusion of specific astrometric datasets. We also find a 3.4$\sigma$ radial-component detection for $\sim$5 km diameter (3200) Phaethon, but this detection is more sensitive to the inclusion of specific datasets, suggesting that it is likely spurious in origin. The other 15 active asteroids in our sample all show non-gravitational accelerations consistent with zero. We explore different physical mechanisms which may give rise to the observed non-gravitational effects, and estimate mass-loss rates from the non-gravitational accelerations. We present a revised momentum-transfer law based on a physically realistic sublimation model for future work on non-gravitational forces, but note that it has little effect on the derived orbital elements.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Accepted by the Astronomical Journal Non-Gravitational Acceleration of the Active Asteroids Man-To Hui (許文韜)1 and David Jewitt1,2 1Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, UCLA, 595 Charles Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, 430 Portola Plaza, Box 951547, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547 [email protected] ABSTRACT Comets can exhibit non-gravitational accelerations caused by recoil forces due to anisotropic mass loss. So might active asteroids. We present an astrometric in- vestigation of 18 active asteroids in search of non-gravitational acceleration. Sta- tistically significant (signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) > 3) detections are obtained in three objects: 313P/Gibbs, 324P/La Sagra and (3200) Phaethon. The strongest and most convincing detection (>7σ in each of three orthogonal components of the acceleration), is for the ∼1 km diameter nucleus of 324P/La Sagra. A 4.5σ detection of the transverse component of the acceleration of 313P/Gibbs (also ∼1 km in diameter) is likely genuine too, as evidenced by the stability of the so- lution to the rejection or inclusion of specific astrometric datasets. We also find a 3.4σ radial-component detection for ∼5 km diameter (3200) Phaethon, but this detection is more sensitive to the inclusion of specific datasets, suggesting that it is likely spurious in origin. The other 15 active asteroids in our sample all show non-gravitational accelerations consistent with zero. We explore different physi- cal mechanisms which may give rise to the observed non-gravitational effects, and estimate mass-loss rates from the non-gravitational accelerations. We present a revised momentum-transfer law based on a physically realistic sublimation model for future work on non-gravitational forces, but note that it has little effect on the derived orbital elements. Subject headings: asteroids: general comets: general -- methods: data analysis -- minor planets, -- 2 -- 1. INTRODUCTION Active asteroids have the dynamical characteristics of asteroids but exhibit transient mass loss, resulting in the production of comet-like appearance (Hsieh and Jewitt 2006). A working definition is that they are bodies which present evidence of mass loss, have semimajor axes, a, smaller than Jupiter's semimajor axis, and have Tisserand parameter with respect to Jupiter, TJ ≥ 3.08. There are currently ∼20 known active asteroids. A number of mechanisms drive the mass loss, including the likely sublimation of exposed ice, asteroid-asteroid impact, and rotational disruption probably driven by radiation torques (Jewitt 2012; Jewitt et al. 2015). The dynamics of active asteroids are of particular interest. Numerical simulations have been conducted to study the dynamical stability of some of these objects (c.f. Jewitt et al. 2015 and citations therein). Recent work by Hsieh & Haghighipour (2016) investigated orbital evolution of test particles dynamically close to the TJ ≃ 3 boundary between asteroids and comets. They found that, due to gravitational interactions with terrestrial planets and temporary trapping by mean-motion resonances with Jupiter, the fraction of the Jupiter- family comets fortuitously evolved into main-belt like orbits on Myr timescales could be as large as ∼0.1 -- 1%. However, most such main-belt captures would be transient, and long-term stable orbits with both small eccentricities and inclinations should be much more rare. Non-gravitational accelerations, if present, might significantly influence the dynamics of small bodies. Fern´andez et al. (2002) and Levison et al. (2006) found that capture into comet 2P/Encke's orbit is possible when assisted by plausible non-gravitational forces from outgassed material, but takes much longer than the expected outgassing lifetimes of comets. They suggested that 2P/Encke might have completed this capture while spending most of its time in a dormant state. Forces due to photon momentum (the Yarkovsky effect (e.g., Chesley et al. 2003; Vokrouhlick´y et al. 2008; Chesley et al. 2012; Nugent et al. 2012; Farnocchia et al. 2014) and radiation pressure) are expected to be tiny compared to forces resulting from protracted anisotropic mass loss but have been detected in small asteroids. To date, the only independently reported measurement of non-gravitational acceleration due to outgassing in an active asteroid is a 3σ detection for 133P/(7968) Elst-Pizarro (Chesley et al. 2010a). In order to develop a better understanding of the active asteroids, we attempt to measure their non-gravitational accelerations. -- 3 -- 2. DATA ANALYSIS AND METHOD Marsden et al. (1973) developed a standard orbit determination technique with non- gravitational effects. The non-gravitational acceleration of a small body, in terms of its radial (i.e., in the antisolar direction), transverse, and normal components AR, AT, and AN, is related to three non-gravitational parameters Aj (j = 1, 2, 3), which are expressed in the same right-handed Cartesian orthogonal coordinates system by   AR AT AN   =  A1 A2 A3   · g (r) , (1) where g (r) is the dimensionless standard momentum-transfer law at heliocentric distance, r, in AU. Marsden et al. (1973) defined g(r) as: g (r) = α(cid:18) r r0(cid:19)−m(cid:20)1 +(cid:18) r r0(cid:19)n(cid:21)−k , (2) in which m = 2.15, n = 5.093, k = 4.6142, the scaling distance r0 = 2.808 AU, and the normalisation factor α = 0.111262, such that g = 1 at r = 1 AU. Accelerations Aj and Aj are traditionally expressed in AU day−2. The momentum-transfer law comes from the assumption by Marsden et al. (1973) that the non-gravitational acceleration of a small body is proportional to the rate of sublimation of water-ice on an isothermal nucleus, with the momentum-transfer law reflecting the proportionality, such that the non-gravitational parameters Aj are always constant. (Sublimation of other materials such as sodium and forsterite can be approximated by the same formalism with different parameters (c.f. Sekan- ina & Kracht 2015), but the sublimation rates of these much less volatile materials are negligible compared to that of water.) In keeping with previous work, we proceed by assum- ing that the momentum-transfer law due to isothermal water-ice sublimation gives rise to the non-gravitational effects of the active asteroids. We downloaded astrometric observations of all the active asteroids from the Minor Planet Center (MPC) Database Search1, and then employed Find Orb by B. Gray for orbit determination. The code uses numerical ephemeris DE431, and includes relativistic effects due to the gravity of the Sun, and perturbations by the eight major planets. Pluto and the 1http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/db_search -- 4 -- thirty most massive asteroids2 are also included. Astrometric observations were debiased and weighted as described in Farnocchia et al. (2014) and Chesley et al. (2010b) before orbit determination. We first calculated purely gravitational orbital solutions for each of the active asteroids, assuming Aj = 0 (j = 1, 2, 3). Weights would be relaxed to be comparable with correspond- ing ad hoc astrometric residuals. We next rejected astrometric observations whose residuals were greater than ±3′′.0 from ad hoc osculating solutions, in an iterative manner. For main- belt objects, such residuals are large compared to systematic errors from the timing or plate constant solutions. They may result from centroiding errors possibly due to the faintness or non-stellar appearance of the object, from interference with background sources or adjacent cosmic rays or from other, unspecified errors. The threshold was chosen to exclude bad out- liers while keeping as many data points as possible. Next, we included Aj (j = 1, 2, 3) as free parameters to be obtained from the best fit orbital solutions. The procedures for filtering outliers and relaxing weights were applied iteratively until convergence was achieved. This normally took three to five runs, somewhat dependent upon the quality of data. We finally recorded the converged orbital solutions along with Aj (j = 1, 2, 3). 3. RESULTS We summarize the resulting non-gravitational parameters of the active asteroids in Table 1. Included are statistically confident detections (SNR > 3) of non-gravitational accelerations for 324P/La Sagra in all the three components, for (3200) Phaethon in the radial direction, and for 313P/Gibbs in the transverse direction. The other active asteroids show no statistically significant evidence (SNR ≤ 3) for non-gravitational effects. Our non-detection of the radial component of non-gravitational acceleration in 133P/(7968) Elst-Pizarro contradicts a 3σ detection reported by Chesley et al. (2010a). However, if only observations prior to 2011 are considered, our result becomes similar to that of Chesley et al. (2010a). Therefore, we conclude that the reported detection is tied to the specific astromet- ric dataset employed, and cannot be trusted as real. Likewise, active asteroid 259P/Garradd shows marginal evidence of a radial non-gravitational acceleration with SNR = 2.97 (see Table 1). However, the result is found to change wildly depending on the particular as- trometric observations selected. Moreover, the fit to 259P/Garradd relies on the smallest number of observations (40, compared to hundreds or thousands for other objects in Table 2The masses of the 30 most massive asteroids range from ∼7 × 1018 kg (375 Ursula) to 9 × 1020 kg (1 Ceres). The values are based on the BC-405 asteroid ephemeris by Baer et al. (2011). 1). Therefore, we do not regard it as a significant detection. -- 5 -- 3.1. 313P/Gibbs Hui & Jewitt (2015) previously discussed the non-gravitational motion of this ∼1 km diameter object. We did not debias the astrometric observations and simply set equal weights to all the data. Nevertheless, the result is consistent with the one in the present work in which we employed more stringent techniques to weight the data. In this sense, the detection of A2, at 4.5σ confidence (Table 1) is relatively insensitive to the method by which the astrometric observations are handled. We thus conclude that it is likely a genuine detection of the transverse non-gravitational acceleration. Admittedly, in order to strengthen this conclusion, more observations of the object are desirable. 3.2. 324P/La Sagra 324P/La Sagra shows the strongest non-gravitational acceleration of all the active aster- oids, with detections >7σ in all three components (see Table 1). The solutions are unlikely to be caused by contamination from undetected systematics in the astrometry because random exclusions of large subsets of the astrometric data hardly change the result. For example, discarding all the data from 2015 leads to no change in the significance of the Aj parameters. Other tests, including arbitrary assignment of equal weights to all the data, have been made, without materially changing the result. While the detection of non-gravitational accelera- tion appears to be secure, the solution is nevertheless somewhat puzzling. In particular, the radial component, A1, is negative (radial non-gravitational acceleration towards the Sun), which seems physically unrealistic in the context of sublimation from the hot day-side of the nucleus. This may indicate that the applied momentum-transfer law by Marsden et al. (1973) is inappropriate to this case, because the mass-loss rate does not vary symmetrically with heliocentric distance (or, equivalently, perihelion time) as described by Equation (2) (see Figure 6 in Jewitt et al. (2016)). Another possibility is that it suggests a circumpolar or high-latitude active source and certain combinations of the spin-axis orientation of its nucleus (Yeomans et al. 2004). -- 6 -- 3.3. (3200) Phaethon Since the discovery in 1983, asteroid (3200) Phaethon had never been observed to show any signs of activity until 2009, 2012 and 2016 when it brightened by a factor of two around perihelion detected by the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft (Jewitt & Li 2010; Li & Jewitt 2013; Hui & Li 2016). Intriguingly, we have a SNR = 3.4 detection for its radial non-gravitational parameter A1, which is statistically significant. Tests such as discarding all observations prior to 1990, or applying an equal weight scheme do affect the SNR slightly, but always leave SNR ∼ 3. However, we can destroy the significance of the detection by, for instance, discarding all the data from the discovery epoch to the mid-1990s. Alternatively, if a much stricter cutoff for astrometric residuals is employed (e.g. . 1′′.5), resulting in removing observations overwhelmingly from the 1980s and early 1990s, the SNR shrinks to ∼2 and thus A1 becomes insignificant. We therefore take the conservative position that the radial non-gravitational component is likely spurious. This is supported by the observation that (3200) Phaethon remains inactive until it is close to the Sun, where the activity is likely triggered by some process (thermal fracture, desiccation?) other than the sublimation of water ice (Jewitt & Li 2010). 4. DISCUSSION 4.1. Test of the Procedure We conducted another test of the algorithms used by the orbit determination code Find Orb to be sure that the software does not introduce false detections of non-gravitational motion. For this purpose, we selected a dozen asteroids ∼10 km in diameter and having apparent magnitudes, orbits and observational histories similar to the majority of the active asteroids. The 10 km asteroids, being ∼103 times more massive than the mostly ∼1 km scale active asteroids (Table 3), are unlikely to exhibit any measurable non-gravitational acceleration and thus serve as tests of the orbital fitting. A list of candidates was generated by the JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine3. We applied the same procedures and techniques described in Section 2 to obtain orbital solutions including Aj (j = 1, 2, 3) as free parameters. The results are summarized in Table 2. As expected, none of the asteroids show significant (>3σ) non-gravitational parameters. Some of the active asteroids have fewer observations than have the selected moderate sized 3http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb_query.cgi. Data retrieved on 2016 July 14. -- 7 -- asteroids. We therefore truncated all the observations prior to 2010 for each of these asteroids and re-performed orbit determination. Again none shows detections on the non-gravitational parameters with SNR > 3. This confirms past work done with Find Orb (e.g., Micheli et al. 2014) independently showing the reliability of the code. The validity of our cutoff set at SNR = 3 is justified as well. 4.2. Mass-Loss Estimates The mass-loss rate needed to provide a given non-gravitational acceleration can be estimated thanks to momentum conservation, using M (t) = − M (t) g (r (t))pA2 κ (t) v (t) 1 + A2 2 + A2 3 , (3) where M is the mass of the body, v is the outflow speed of the ejecta, and κ is a dimensionless factor which accounts for the collimation efficiency. The latter lies in the range 0 ≤ κ ≤ 1, with κ = 0 for isotropic ejection and κ = 1 for perfectly collimated mass loss. We approximate the outflow speed as a function of heliocentric distance by mean thermal speed vth = p8kBT / (πµmH), where µ = 18 is the molecular mass for the water-ice sublimation scenario, mH = 1.67 × 10−27 kg is the mass of the hydrogen atom and kB = 1.38 × 10−23 J K−1 is the Boltzmann constant. We solve for the surface temperature, T , using the energy balance equation (1 − A) S⊙ r2 cos ζ = ǫσT 4 + L (T ) Z (T ) (4) in combination with the Clausius-Clapeyron relation for water ice. Here, A is the Bond albedo, S⊙ = 1361 W m−2 is the solar constant, cos ζ is the effective projection factor for the surface, r is expressed in AU, ǫ is the emissivity, σ = 5.67 × 10−8 W m−2 K−4 is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, L (T ) in J kg−1 is the latent heat of vaporization, and Z (T ) in molecules per unit time per unit area is the gas production rate per unit area of surface. In this study, we assume ǫ = 1, and cos ζ = 1/4, the latter corresponding to an isothermal nucleus, while L(T ) is documented in Huebner et al. (2006). The Bond albedos of the active asteroids are computed according to their geometric albedos by following the method by Bowell et al. (1989). The choice of cos ζ = 1/4 is made to remain consistent with the isothermal assumption by Marsden et al. (1973) (but see Appendix A). The collimation efficiency remains observationally unconstrained, although observations showing that cometary emissions are largely sunward suggest that small values of κ are -- 8 -- unrealistic. We choose κ ≡ 0.8 for the sake of definiteness. Combined with Equation (4), the time-average mass-loss rate around the orbit can be numerically estimated by transforming Equation (3) to πρD3pA2 1 + A2 6κP 2 + A2 3 M ≃ − Z P 0 g (r (t)) vth (r (t)) dt, (5) where ρ is the bulk density, D is the diameter of the body, and P is the orbital period. We assume nominal density ρ = 103 kg m−3 for all the active asteroids, while D is extracted from either the JPL Small-Body Database Browser or Table 2 in Jewitt et al. (2015). The M solely from the covariance results are listed in Table 3. We calculated the uncertainty of matrix of Aj (j = 1, 2, 3) based upon error propagation. For cases where objects have SNR ≤ 3 for M , we list 5σ upper limits to the values. The upper limits to mass-loss rates inferred dynamically are consistent with, but less stringent than, published mass-loss rates inferred from physical observations. Although A2 is formally significant for 313P/Gibbs, large uncertainties in A1 and A3 degrade the total SNR M is given in the table. The dynamical to < 3, and therefore only a 5σ upper limit for its estimate for the mass-loss rate of 324P/La Sagra (36 ± 3 kg s−1), however, exceeds values obtained from physical observations (∼0.2 -- 4 kg s−1; Moreno et al. (2011), Hsieh et al. (2012), Jewitt et al. (2016)) by at least an order of magnitude. Notably, while 324P/La Sagra was active, it exhibited the highest ratio of the ejected dust mass to the nucleus mass amongst the active asteroids currently known (Hsieh 2014), suggesting an inherently higher water-ice content. Intriguingly, it is one of the active asteroids identified by Hsieh & Haghighipour (2016) as a potential captured Jupiter-family comet. This is likely correlated to our finding that 324P/La Sagra has the most significant detection in the non-gravitational acceleration. For (3200) Phaethon, since the detection of its radial non-gravitational acceleration is likely spurious, we only present a 5σ upper limit (< 200 kg s−1) in Table 3. This weak limit is consistent with the perihelion value (∼3 kg s−1; Jewitt et al. 2013), as well as the average rate needed to sustain the Geminid stream over its lifetime (Jewitt et al. 2015). In neither case, however, is a firm physical interpretation possible, because it is not known how well the adopted momentum-transfer law represents mass loss that may be highly stochastic in nature. -- 9 -- 4.3. Change in Orbital Elements The presence of a non-zero non-gravitational force results in a change of the orbit. Here we proceed to study changes in the semimajor axis, a, and eccentricity, e, due to the non- gravitational effect, which can be calculated by means of Gauss' form of Lagrange's planetary equations e sin θ √1 − e2 P π (cid:20)AR P√1 − e2 2πa a = e = a√1 − e2 r (cid:21) , + AT [AR sin θ + AT (cos θ + cos E)] , (6) (7) where θ is the true anomaly, and E is the eccentric anomaly (Danby 1992). We consider their time-average values by g (r) A2a√1 − e2 Z P A2√1 − e2 g (r)(cid:20)cos θ + Z P 2πa dt, π r 0 0 ¯a ≃ ¯e ≃ 1 e(cid:16)1 − r a(cid:17)(cid:21) dt, (8) (9) Here we have assumed that all of the orbital elements are changing very slowly, such that only θ-dependent functions cannot be taken out of the integral. All the terms containing sin θ in the right-hand side of Equations (6) and (7) are eliminated thanks to the orbital symmetry. By substituting time t with the eccentric anomaly θ (see Appendix B), we obtain P A2 π2a Z π 2π2a3 Z π P A2 0 0 ¯a ≃ ¯e ≃ rg (r) dθ, r2g (r)(cid:20)cos θ + 1 e(cid:16)1 − r a(cid:17)(cid:21) dθ, (10) (11) Note that Equations (10) and (11) are only applicable to objects not in strong mean-motion resonances with Jupiter, the most massive planet in the solar system, because the gravita- tional influence from Jupiter is simply ignored. Indeed, none of the active asteroids are in strong mean-motion resonances with Jupiter. We list the results in Table 3. 324P/La Sagra -- 10 -- has the most interesting result, with astoundingly large ¯a and ¯e. The trend indicates that its heliocentric orbit is rapidly becoming smaller and more circular. The timescale to drift ∼1 AU, if the non-gravitational effect is persistent, would be ∼105 yr. Sustained dynamical evolution on this timescale means that we cannot be sure of the origin of this body, either as a short-period comet trapped from the Kuiper belt or as an icy asteroid from another part of the main-belt. On the other hand, however, its huge A2 suggests a very short active lifetime, limited by the availability of volatiles. Using only physical observations, Jewitt et al. (2016) reported a lifetime to mass loss of ∼105 yr and concluded that, to survive for the expected ∼0.4 Gyr collisional lifetime, the body must lie dormant for all but 0.02 -- 0.08% of the time. In this regard, the inferences from the orbit and from physical observations are concordant. 4.4. Other Physical Mechanisms We are aware that several mechanisms other than sublimation account for mass-loss from some of the active asteroids (Jewitt et al. 2015). While the Yarkovsky effect and the solar radiation pressure force can impart non-gravitational accelerations on an active asteroid in a continuous manner similar to sublimation activity, non-gravitational forces due to rotational instability and impacts obviously cannot be described by the momentum- transfer law in the formalism by Marsden et al. (1973). In particular, mass shedding from rotational instability is believed to be extremely stochastic, as evidenced by distinguishing differences in morphologies between active asteroids possibly experiencing rotational instabil- ity (311P/PANSTARRS, 331P/Gibbs, P/2010 A2, and P/2013 R3; Jewitt et al. 2015). We should not expect any detection in non-gravitational effects for these objects, because, first, there is no preference on directions of mass shedding, and second, astrometry from relatively low-resolution observations normally contains larger errors in centroiding optocenters, once there are other fragments apparently close to the primary. Indeed, we have no detections in non-gravitational effects for the active asteroids undergoing suspected rotational instability (see Table 1). The momentum-transfer law by Marsden et al. (1973) also fails for active asteroids suffering from collision-induced mass loss, including (493) Griseldis (Tholen et al. 2015) and (596) Scheila (Ishiguro et al. 2011a,b). The momentum-transfer law for impacts should instead be a Dirac delta function at the time of collision. We investigate changes in the orbital elements for these two active asteroids, considering gravity alone, by comparing the results before and after the impact for each object. No statistically significant detection of orbital change is made. We think that this is in agreement with Ishiguro et al. (2011a) that -- 11 -- the impactor (∼10 m) was much smaller than (596) Scheila (∼102 km). For (493) Griseldis, there is unfortunately no size estimate for the impactor. 4.4.1. Solar Radiation The non-gravitational acceleration of a spherical body subjected to solar radiation pres- sure is given by (AR)rad = 3 (1 + A) S⊙ 2cρDr2 , (12) where g (r) remains unchanged from Equation (2). B) for each active asteroid. If its source is regarded as from water-ice sublimation, the cor- where c = 3×108 m s−1 is the speed of light, and r is expressed in AU. We examine the time- average radiation acceleration at mean heliocentric distance hri = a 4√1 − e2 (see Appendix responding radial non-gravitational parameter is then given by (cid:16) A1(cid:17)rad ≃ (cid:0)AR(cid:1)rad /g (hri), We present the results in Table 3, where we can see that the observed A1 is at least an order of magnitude larger than (cid:16) A1(cid:17)rad . It therefore suggests that either this effect is too small among the active asteroids, or the uncertainty from the observations is too large to enable such a detection. So far only some near-earth asteroids of ∼10 m size have been observed to show measurable acceleration due to solar radiation pressure (e.g. Micheli et al. 2014). Therefore, we think that the influence of the solar radiation pressure on the (much larger) active asteroids is negligible. 4.4.2. Yarkovsky Effect The other important physical mechanism which can give rise to a non-gravitational Its transverse acceleration of a sub- or kilometer-sized asteroid is the Yarkovsky effect. acceleration is given by (AT)Y = CY ≤ CY ǫσT 3 cρD ∆T cos ψ ǫσT 3 cρD ∆T (13) -- 12 -- where CY is a dimensionless parameter which is related to the object's shape, ∆T is the temperature difference between the morning and evening hemispheres, and ψ is the obliquity of the object. Thanks to the normalisation to r = 1 AU, the relationship (A2)Y ∝ D−1, where (A2)Y is the transverse non-gravitational parameter due to the Yarkovsky effect, is then roughly satisfied. We therefore use (A2)Y,Bennu, the transverse non-gravitational parameter due to the Yarkovsky effect of asteroid (101955) Bennu, hitherto the most reliable and strongest detection, as a reference to assess expected values for the active asteroids (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(A2)Y,exp(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) =(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(A2)Y,Bennu(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) DBennu D , (14) where (A2)Y,Bennu = −4.5 × 10−14 AU day−2, and DBennu = 0.49 km is Bennu's diameter (Farnocchia et al. 2013). The semimajor-axis drift due to the Yarkovsky effect can be computed by Equation (10), with g(r) = r−m, where the exact value of m depends upon thermal properties of the asteroid which are, unfortunately, poorly known. However, the choice of m has little effect in a typical range of 2 < m < 3 in the computation (Farnocchia et al. 2013), and thus we adopt m = 2. Consequently, the expected drift in the semimajor axis can be simplified as P(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(A2)Y,Bennu(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) DBennu πa2 (1 − e2) D . (15) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(¯a)Y,exp(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ≃ If the non-gravitational effect of the active asteroid is purely due to the Yarkovsky effect, the criterion ¯a .(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(¯a)Y,exp(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) must be satisfied, where ¯a is listed in Table 3. By comparison, we notice that (2201) Oljato, and (3200) Phaethon are the only two4 potential candidates whose motions might be influenced by the Yarkovsky effect, and we proceed to calculate their (A2)Y, by utilising the same procedures as described in Section 2. The results are summarized in Table 4. Unfortunately, neither of the active asteroids show statistically significant detections. We therefore conclude that no Yarkovsky effect is detected amongst the active asteroids. It is noteworthy that we failed to reproduce (A2)Y of (3200) Phaethon reported by Chernetenko (2010) and Galushina et al. (2015) even though observations after 2015 were discarded as a means to use a similar shorter observing arc. A possible explanation is that they might have assigned too aggressive weights to some of the observations and thus the 4Active asteroid (62412) 2000 SY178 seemingly satisfies the criterion as well, but it is disqualified by the huge uncertainty in A2 (see Table 1). -- 13 -- uncertainty decreases while the nominal (A2)Y may increase. Instead, our finding of (A2)Y of (3200) Phaethon is in good match with D. Farnocchia (2016, private communication). 5. SUMMARY We examined 18 active asteroids in search of evidence for non-gravitational accelerations caused by anisotropic mass-loss, with the following results: 1. Three active asteroids (313P/Gibbs, 324P/La Sagra and (3200) Phaethon), exhibit non-gravitational accelerations with at least one component having formal signal- to-noise ratio SNR > 3. We are confident in the non-gravitational detections of 313P/Gibbs and, especially, 324P/La Sagra, both kilometer-scale objects with orbital semi-major axes near 3 AU. However, the derived non-gravitational acceleration of (3200) Phaethon, although formally significant, is influenced by systematic uncertain- ties of measurement, and we do not regard it as real. 2. Upper limits to the mass-loss rates implied by our non-detections of non-gravitational acceleration are less sensitive than, but broadly consistent with, rates inferred inde- pendently from physical observations. However, the rate inferred for 324P/La Sagra (∼36 kg s−1) is an order of magnitude larger than values based on physical observations (0.2 -- 4 kg s−1). The reason for this disagreement is not known, but may relate to the poor approximation to impulsive mass loss given by the use of the non-gravitational force law by Marsden et al. (1973). 3. The momentum-transfer law devised by Marsden et al. (1973) assumes sublimation from an isothermal surface and is logically inconsistent with the existence of non- gravitational acceleration (Appendix A). Anisothermal surface temperature distribu- tions are physically more plausible and should replace the law by Marsden et al. (1973). Except in special cases, the law proposed here (Table 5) will give similar results for the derived non-gravitational parameters. 4. We find no evidence for radiation pressure acceleration or the Yarkovsky effect in our sample. We thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions. This work used the Find Orb code by Bill Gray, for whose assistance we are extremely grateful. We are indebted to Aldo Vitagliano, Davide Farnocchia, and Quan-Zhi Ye for insightful discussions. -- 14 -- We also thank all observers who submitted astrometric data to the Minor Planet Center, except the ones who submitted really bad astrometry and thus tortured us. This work is funded by a grant from NASA to DJ. -- 15 -- A. THE MARSDEN MOMENTUM TRANSFER LAW The momentum-transfer law by Marsden et al. (1973) has been widely used to calculate non-gravitational accelerations of comets. It assumes that sublimation proceeds at a rate appropriate for a uniform, isothermal, spherical nucleus in instantaneous equilibrium with sunlight. However, an isothermal, spherical nucleus would sublimate isotropically, producing no recoil force. Therefore, the law by Marsden et al. (1973) is logically inconsistent with the presence of non-gravitational acceleration. We briefly examine the significance of this inconsistency. As limiting cases, we compare in Figure (1) the model by Marsden et al. (1973) (solid black line) with three different solutions to Equation (4). Our approximation to isothermal sublimation (labeled cos ζ = 1/4 and shown by a red dash-dot line in the figure) essentially reproduces that by Marsden et al. (1973). Models in which sunlight heats only the day- side of the nucleus (cos ζ = 1/2, dashed green line) and in which heat is deposited only at the sub-solar point (cos ζ = 1, dotted blue line) both show substantially higher specific sublimation rates at r & 2.5 AU as a result of the higher average temperatures. The revised non-gravitational parameters for these models are listed in Table 5. To test the effect of the differences shown in Figure (1), we computed new orbits of selected short-period and Halley-type comets with nonzero non-gravitational effects5 using astrometric data from the MPC Database Search with the parameters in Table 5. We found that, even when using the two most extreme scenarios (namely, the isothermal (cos ζ = 1/4) and subsolar (cos ζ = 1) models), the derived orbital solutions and time-average non- gravitational accelerations are unchanged, within the uncertainties. Specifically, the RMS of best fits computed using the different momentum transfer laws of Table 5 are basically the same. Physically, this is because the differences between the sublimation curves in Figure (1) are significant only at r & 2.5 AU, where the momentum flux driven by water- ice sublimation is already very low. Nevertheless, our suggestion is for future work to use the best-fit parameters given in Table 5 for cos ζ = 1/2. This case is physically the most plausible, since cometary nuclei are observed to sublimate primarily from the dayside (Keller et al. 2004), and it is also logically consistent with a net force acting on the nucleus. Of course in reality, non-gravitational effects due to mass-loss activity are strongly dependent on, for instance, the shape, topography, spin, and thermal properties of individual nuclei, as well as the distribution of volatiles. It is impractical to devise a model which can 5This was checked through the JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine. Only comets with >10σ detections on non-gravitational effects were selected. -- 16 -- universally satisfy all the cases of such complexity. Besides, little is known about the nuclei of the majority of comets. Therefore, adopting the aforementioned simplistic model is still appropriate and necessary for most cases. B. DERIVATION OF TIME-AVERAGE VALUES Let us consider a continuous function of time t which is symmetric about axes of a body's elliptical orbit, denoted as f (t). The elliptical orbit has semimajor axis a and eccentricity e. Now the task is to find its time-average value ¯f = 1 P Z P 0 f (t) dt, (B1) where P is the orbital period. Because f (t) is symmetric about the axes of the ellipse, i.e., f (P − t) = f (t), Equation (B1) is therefore equivalent to ¯f = 2 P Z P 2 0 f (t) dt. (B2) It is often the case where f is explicitly a function of true anomaly θ, i.e., f = f (θ), and henceforth we need to find a way which connects θ and t. From orbital mechanics we know the following relationships: P 2π M, t − t0 = M = E − sin E, E = arccos(cid:18) e + cos θ 1 + e cos θ(cid:19) , (B3) (B4) (B5) where M is the mean anomaly, and E is the eccentric anomaly. Differentiating both sides from Equation (B3) to (B5) yields dt = P 2π dM, dM = (1 − cos E) dE, dθ. dE = √1 − e2 1 + e cos θ (B6) (B7) (B8) -- 17 -- We then apply the chain rule to Equation (B2) and obtain dM dE dt dM f ¯f = = 2 P Z π dE dθ dθ (1 − e2)3/2 0 π Z π 0 dθ f (θ) (1 + e cos θ)2 . (B9) Under polar coordinates with one of the foci at the origin, which represents the Sun, and the other focus on the negative x-axis, the elliptical orbit is expressed by r = a (1 − e2) 1 + e cos θ . Combining Equations (B9) with (B10), we derive ¯f = 1 πa2√1 − e2 Z π 0 dθf (θ) r2. (B10) (B11) In this study we need mean temperatures of the active asteroids, whose orbits are approximately elliptic, by ignoring perturbations from other bodies and non-gravitational effects. In accordance with Equation (4), we have f = r−2 in this scenario. Immediately, we obtain r2(cid:19) = (cid:18) 1 1 a2√1 − e2 . (B12) The equivalent mean heliocentric distance under this definition is thereby hri = a 4√1 − e2. Interestingly, the time-average heliocentric distance is ¯r = a (1 + e2/2), given by Equation (B9) with f = r. -- 18 -- REFERENCES Baer, J., Chesley, S. R., & Matson, R. D. 2011, AJ, 141, 143 Bowell, E., Hapke, B., Domingue, D., et al. 1989, Asteroids II, eds. R. Binzel, T. Gehrels & M. Matthews, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 524 Chernetenko, Y. A. 2010, Protecting the Earth against Collisions with Asteroids and Comet Nuclei, Proceedings of the International Conference "Asteroid-Comet Hazard 2009", eds. A. M. Finkelstein, W. F. Huebner, & V. A. Shor (St. Petersburg: Nauka), p.289 Chesley, S. R., Ostro, S. J., Vokrouhlick´y, D., et al. 2003, Science, 302, 1739 Chesley, S. R., Kaluna, H., Kleyna, J., et al. 2010, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 42, 950 Chesley, S. R., Baer, J., & Monet, D. G. 2010, Icarus, 210, 158 Chesley, S. R., Nolan, M. C., Farnocchia, D., et al. 2012, Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 2012, 1667, 6470 Danby, J. M. A. 1992, Fundamentals of Celestial Mechanics (Richmond, VA, U.S.A.: Willman-Bell, Inc., 2003. 2nd ed., revised & enlarged ) Farnocchia, D., Chesley, S. R., Vokrouhlick´y, D., et al. 2013, Icarus, 224, 1 Farnocchia, D., Chesley, S. R., Chodas, P. W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 114 Galushina, T. Y., Ryabova, G. O., & Skripnichenko, P. V. 2015, Planet. Space Sci., 118, 296 Hsieh, H. H. 2014, Icarus, 243, 16 Hsieh, H. H., & Jewitt, D. 2006, Science, 312, 561 Hsieh, H. H., Yang, B., Haghighipour, N., et al. 2012, AJ, 143, 104 Hsieh, H. H., & Haghighipour, N. 2016, Icarus, 277, 19 Huebner, W. F., Benkhoff, J., Capria, M.-T., et al. 2006, Heat and Gas Diffusion in Comet Nuclei, by Walter F. Huebner, Johannes Benkhoff, Maria-Theresa Capria, Angioletta Coradini, Christina De Sanctis, Roberto Orosei, and Dina Prialnik. SR-004, June, 2006. ISBN 1608-280X. Published for The International Space Science Institute, Bern, Switzerland, by ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2006., Hui, M.-T., & Jewitt, D. 2015, AJ, 149, 134 -- 19 -- Hui, M.-T., & Li, J. 2016, arXiv:1611.07061 Ishiguro, M., Hanayama, H., Hasegawa, S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, L11 Ishiguro, M., Hanayama, H., Hasegawa, S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, L24 Jewitt, D. 2012, AJ, 143, 66 Jewitt, D., & Li, J. 2010, AJ, 140, 1519 Jewitt, D., Li, J., & Agarwal, J. 2013, ApJ, 771, L36 Jewitt, D., Hsieh, H., & Agarwal, J. 2015, Asteroids IV, eds. P. Michel, F. DeMeo, & W. Bottke, University of Arizona Space Science Series, 895 pp, p. 221 Jewitt, D., Agarwal, J., Weaver, H., et al. 2016, arXiv:1606.08522 Keller, H. U., Britt, D., Buratti, B. J., & Thomas, N. 2004, Comets II, eds. M. C. Festou, H. U. Keller, & H. A. Weaver, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 745 pp., p. 211 Levison, H. F., Terrell, D., Wiegert, P. A., Dones, L., & Duncan, M. J. 2006, Icarus, 182, 161 Li, J., & Jewitt, D. 2013, AJ, 145, 154 Marsden, B. G., Sekanina, Z., & Yeomans, D. K. 1973, AJ, 78, 211 Micheli, M., Tholen, D. J., & Elliott, G. T. 2014, ApJ, 788, L1 Moreno, F., Lara, L. M., Licandro, J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 738, L16 Nugent, C. R., Margot, J. L., Chesley, S. R., & Vokrouhlick´y, D. 2012, AJ, 144, 60 Sekanina, Z., & Kracht, R. 2015, ApJ, 801, 135 Stevens, B. L., Sarneczky, K., Wainscoat, R. J., et al. 2016, Minor Planet Electronic Circu- lars, 2016-G72, Tholen, D. J., Sheppard, S. S., & Trujillo, C. A. 2015, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, 47, #414.03 Tubbiolo, A. F., Bressi, T. H., Wainscoat, R. J., et al. 2015, Minor Planet Electronic Circu- lars, 2015-X180, Vokrouhlick´y, D., Chesley, S. R., & Matson, R. D. 2008, AJ, 135, 2336 -- 20 -- Yeomans, D. K., Chodas, P. W., Sitarski, G., Szutowicz, S., & Kr´olikowska, M. 2004, Comets II, eds. M. C. Festou, H. U. Keller, & H. A. Weaver, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 745 pp., p.137 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. Table 1. Non-Gravitational Parameters of Active Asteroids Object A1 SNR(A1) A2 SNR(A2) A3 SNR(A3) Data arc # obs† # opp‡ RMS (AU day−2) −1.15 × 10−11 +5.09 × 10−10 −4.83 × 10−10 −4.18 × 10−8 −2.88 × 10−8 −1.26 × 10−10 +2.28 × 10−9 +3.27 × 10−8 −2.96 × 10−7 −1.09 × 10−7 +6.71 × 10−11 +7.53 × 10−12 +4.67 × 10−13 +6.97 × 10−12 +5.20 × 10−10 −1.76 × 10−7 −6.52 × 10−6 +1.65 × 10−6 107P 133P 176P 238P 259P 288P 311P 313P 324P 331P 493 596 2201 3200 62412 P/2010 A2 P/2012 T1 P/2013 R3 (AU day−2) −3.56 × 10−14 +3.63 × 10−12 −1.04 × 10−11 −3.40 × 10−8 +5.17 × 10−9 +4.69 × 10−12 +3.12 × 10−11 +2.13 × 10−8 −1.47 × 10−7 +5.16 × 10−10 −2.47 × 10−12 −1.16 × 10−12 +2.95 × 10−14 −1.44 × 10−15 −1.53 × 10−14 +7.97 × 10−8 −1.06 × 10−6 +6.80 × 10−7 (AU day−2) +1.64 × 10−11 −1.14 × 10−10 −9.12 × 10−11 +6.12 × 10−12 +1.10 × 10−8 −5.31 × 10−10 −6.36 × 10−10 −4.82 × 10−9 −3.75 × 10−8 +6.58 × 10−9 +1.74 × 10−12 −1.85 × 10−10 −3.36 × 10−12 +8.88 × 10−13 +1.02 × 10−9 −1.10 × 10−7 +2.22 × 10−7 −5.23 × 10−8 2.58 0.33 0.42 2.13 0.70 0.09 2.23 4.45 10.50 0.87 1.80 1.75 2.29 0.92 < 1% 2.21 1.58 1.40 2.03 2.62 2.64 1.13 2.97 0.20 1.85 1.75 10.46 2.24 0.73 0.22 0.15 3.40 0.83 1.56 1.42 1.04 1.97 0.33 0.18 < 1% 2.61 1.38 1.10 1.83 7.41 0.96 0.01 2.14 0.32 0.59 1.08 1.34 1.27 2.19 1949 -- 2016 1979 -- 2016 1999 -- 2016 2005 -- 2011 2008 -- 2012 2000 -- 2015 2005 -- 2015 2003 -- 2014 2010 -- 2015 2004 -- 2015 1902 -- 2016 1908 -- 2016 1931 -- 2015 1983 -- 2016 1999 -- 2016 2010 -- 2012 2012 -- 2013 2013 -- 2014 909 (17) 716 (13) 568 (2) 141 (0) 40 (6) 160 (0) 158 (3) 94 (3) 421 (2) 148 (10) 1388 (29) 3418 (71) 823 (23) 3161 (60) 737 (2) 127 (95) 165 (1) 316 (5) 18 18 14 4 4 9 5 3 4 6 27 41 25 30 13 2 1 1 (′′) 0.57 0.50 0.48 0.59 0.73 0.52 0.45 0.63 0.48 0.86 0.51 0.40 0.51 0.46 0.54 1.23 0.45 0.63 -- 2 1 -- †Total number of observations of all types (optical and radar) used in fit. Number of discarded data bracketed. ‡Number of observed oppositions Note. -- The non-gravitational parameters are calculated based on the isothermal water-ice sublimation model devised by Marsden et al. (1973). SNR(Aj ) (j = 1, 2, 3) is the ratio of Aj over its 1σ uncertainty. All of the astrometric observations were retrieved on 2016 July 14 -- 15. Table 2. Non-Gravitational Parameters of Some Moderate-Size Asteroids Object A1 SNR(A1) A2 SNR(A2) A3 SNR(A3) Data arc # obs† # opp‡ RMS (AU day−2) −2.73 × 10−11 −3.29 × 10−12 +1.86 × 10−11 +6.59 × 10−12 −7.85 × 10−12 −9.26 × 10−11 +2.52 × 10−11 −6.45 × 10−12 +3.16 × 10−11 +6.32 × 10−13 −1.36 × 10−11 +4.64 × 10−11 3818 7916 9344 11313 13426 16392 18333 20099 20293 23059 25343 26662 (AU day−2) +2.31 × 10−13 +1.72 × 10−13 +1.93 × 10−12 −1.48 × 10−12 −2.37 × 10−13 −2.37 × 10−13 −1.20 × 10−13 −5.11 × 10−12 −9.05 × 10−13 −3.62 × 10−13 −1.66 × 10−12 −4.82 × 10−13 1.65 0.23 0.58 0.09 0.45 1.84 1.02 0.05 2.09 0.05 0.50 1.08 (AU day−2) +3.19 × 10−11 +2.56 × 10−11 +1.12 × 10−10 +1.67 × 10−10 +1.97 × 10−11 +5.85 × 10−11 +3.83 × 10−11 +2.97 × 10−11 +6.33 × 10−11 +1.97 × 10−11 +7.86 × 10−11 +7.31 × 10−11 0.62 0.61 2.59 1.69 0.86 0.13 0.09 0.51 1.66 0.76 2.54 0.62 1.16 1.03 2.45 1.90 0.71 0.57 0.71 0.14 1.94 0.80 1.95 2.09 1979 -- 2015 1978 -- 2015 1991 -- 2016 1976 -- 2016 1975 -- 2015 1977 -- 2016 1987 -- 2016 1991 -- 2015 1980 -- 2016 1991 -- 2016 1992 -- 2015 1974 -- 2015 1166 (16) 1080 (5) 1222 (6) 1219 (3) 792 (2) 1085 (2) 1100 (4) 852 (1) 1099 (5) 1240 (1) 866 (6) 636 (1) 20 18 16 18 14 19 16 17 15 15 16 17 (′′) 0.49 0.53 0.54 0.52 0.54 0.50 0.54 0.49 0.52 0.47 0.56 0.56 †Total number of observations of all types (optical and radar) used in fit. Number of discarded data bracketed. ‡Number of observed oppositions -- 2 2 -- Note. -- All of the asteroids have diameters ∼10 km. The non-gravitational parameters are calculated based on the isothermal water-ice sublimation model devised by Marsden et al. (1973). All of the astrometric observations were retrieved on 2016 July 14 -- 15. -- 23 -- Table 3. Physical and Derived Properties Object D(1) A(2) (km) − M (3) (kg s−1) (cid:0)AR(cid:1)rad (AU day−2) (4) (cid:16)eA1(cid:17)rad (AU day−2) (5) ¯a(6) (AU yr−1) ¯e(7) (yr−1) < 0.5 3.5 3.8 4.0 0.8 0.6 3 107P 133P 176P 238P 259P 288P 311P 313P 324P 331P 493 596 2201 3200 62412 P/2010 A2 P/2012 T1 P/2013 R3 < 0.4 1.0 1.1 1.8 46.4 113.3 1.8 5.1 7.8 0.12 2.4 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.11 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 < 5 < 4 < 5 < 13 < 32 < 8 < 1 < 12 36 ± 3 . 77 . 103 . 105 < 2 < 200 < 70 < 1 . 104 < 141 1.82 × 10−14 9.26 × 10−15 8.68 × 10−15 4.48 × 10−14 8.25 × 10−14 1.26 × 10−14 3.59 × 10−14 3.31 × 10−14 2.13 × 10−14 7.81 × 10−16 3.60 × 10−16 6.68 × 10−14 9.36 × 10−14 4.51 × 10−15 5.65 × 10−13 1.49 × 10−14 5.06 × 10−13 −1.9 × 10−9 −2.7 × 10−10 1.14 × 10−11 +3.2 × 10−9 +6.5 × 10−10 1.24 × 10−11 −1.2 × 10−8 −2.5 × 10−9 4.76 × 10−11 −9.9 × 10−5 −2.0 × 10−5 8.35 × 10−12 +6.7 × 10−5 +1.3 × 10−5 +2.0 × 10−9 8.14 × 10−12 +9.5 × 10−9 > 1.59 × 10−13 > 2.56 × 10−12 +3.1 × 10−7 +4.1 × 10−8 3.76 × 10−11 +5.4 × 10−5 +1.1 × 10−5 2.95 × 10−11 −1.4 × 10−4 −2.8 × 10−5 1.28 × 10−11 +2.1 × 10−7 +2.0 × 10−8 7.84 × 10−13 −2.7 × 10−9 −5.5 × 10−10 1.30 × 10−13 −2.2 × 10−9 −4.5 × 10−10 3.81 × 10−13 +2.8 × 10−9 +3.8 × 10−10 6.66 × 10−14 −9.4 × 10−10 −2.6 × 10−10 5.87 × 10−12 −4.6 × 10−12 −7.3 × 10−13 1.29 × 10−11 +6.5 × 10−4 +9.8 × 10−5 −5.2 × 10−4 1.57 × 10−11 −2.5 × 10−3 > 9.77 × 10−14 > 5.09 × 10−11 +3.3 × 10−3 +6.7 × 10−4 (1)Diameter (2)Bond albedo (3)Time-average mass-loss rate estimated from Equation (5) (4)Computed non-gravitational acceleration due to the solar radiation force (5)Radial non-gravitational parameter due to the solar radiation force but computed with the momentum- transfer law by Marsden et al. (1973) (6)Time-average drift in semimajor axis (7)Time-average drift in eccentricity Note. -- The significance levels of an orbital drift in a and e are predominantly determined by the ones of the non-gravitational parameters, which are the most uncertain parameters compared to the rest orbital elements. See Equations (10) and (11). Therefore, the SNRs of ¯a and ¯e are both given by SNR(A2), listed in Table 1. -- 24 -- Table 4. Transverse Non-Gravitational Parameters Due to the Yarkovsky Effect Object (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(A2)Y,exp(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)† (AU day−2) (A2)Y ‡ (AU day−2) Data arc # obs∗ # opp⋆ RMS (′′) 0.51 0.46 2201 3200 1.2 × 10−14 4.4 × 10−15 (+2.89 ± 1.28) × 10−14 (−1.39 ± 1.56) × 10−15 1931 -- 2015 1983 -- 2016 824 (22) 3161 (60) 25 30 †Value of expected transverse non-gravitational parameter due to the Yarkovsky effect estimated from the one of (101955) Bennu through Equation (14). ‡Transverse non-gravitational parameter due to the Yarkovsky effect computed from orbit determination. ∗Total number of observations of all types (optical and radar) used in fit. Number of discarded data bracketed. ⋆Number of observed oppositions. Note. -- The same technique as used for obtaining the non-gravitational parameters in Table 1 is applied, with the modified momentum-transfer law g(r) = r−2. Table 5. Parameters in the Momentum-Transfer Law Parameter cos ζ = 1/4 (Isothermal) cos ζ = 1/2 (Hemispherical) cos ζ = 1 (Subsolar) Unit α m n k r0 0.1258295 2.13294 5.30728 4.19724 2.67110 0.0337694 2.08782 4.04051 11.4543 5.10588 0.0003321 2.04680 3.06682 2752.35 50.4755 -- -- -- -- AU Note. -- Each least-squares fit was performed for heliocentric dis- tance r ≤ 5 AU, beyond which the contribution from the water-ice sublimation is negligible. See Figure 1 for comparison. -- 25 -- Fig. 1. -- Comparison of our best fits in the formalism by Equation (2) for three different sublimation scenarios, i.e., cos ζ = 1/4 (isothermal sublimation), 1/2, and 1 (subsolar), and the best fit by Marsden et al. (1973). The actual normalised water-ice sublimation functions are indistinguishable from our best fits correspondingly, were they plotted in the figure, and therefore are omitted. Different fits are discriminated by line styles.
1504.04379	2	1504	2015-09-25T02:52:58	The K2-ESPRINT Project. I. Discovery of the Disintegrating Rocky Planet K2-22b with a Cometary Head and Leading Tail	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present the discovery of a transiting exoplanet candidate in the K2 Field-1 with an orbital period of 9.1457 hr: K2-22b. The highly variable transit depths, ranging from $\sim$0\% to 1.3\%, are suggestive of a planet that is disintegrating via the emission of dusty effluents. We characterize the host star as an M-dwarf with $T_{\rm eff} \simeq 3800$ K. We have obtained ground-based transit measurements with several 1-m class telescopes and with the GTC. These observations (1) improve the transit ephemeris; (2) confirm the variable nature of the transit depths; (3) indicate variations in the transit shapes; and (4) demonstrate clearly that at least on one occasion the transit depths were significantly wavelength dependent. The latter three effects tend to indicate extinction of starlight by dust rather than by any combination of solid bodies. The K2 observations yield a folded light curve with lower time resolution but with substantially better statistical precision compared with the ground-based observations. We detect a significant "bump" just after the transit egress, and a less significant bump just prior to transit ingress. We interpret these bumps in the context of a planet that is not only likely streaming a dust tail behind it, but also has a more prominent leading dust trail that precedes it. This effect is modeled in terms of dust grains that can escape to beyond the planet's Hill sphere and effectively undergo `Roche lobe overflow,' even though the planet's surface is likely underfilling its Roche lobe by a factor of 2.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE Astrophysical Journal, 2015 SEPTEMBER 1 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 THE K2-ESPRINT PROJECT. I. DISCOVERY OF THE DISINTEGRATING ROCKY PLANET K2-22B WITH A COMETARY HEAD AND LEADING TAIL. R. SANCHIS-OJEDA1, 2, S. RAPPAPORT3, E. PALLÈ4, 5, L. DELREZ6, J. DEVORE7, D. GANDOLFI8,9, A. FUKUI10, I. RIBAS11, K. G. STASSUN12,13, S. ALBRECHT14, F. DAI3, E. GAIDOS15, M. GILLON5, T. HIRANO16, M. HOLMAN17, A. W. HOWARD18, H. ISAACSON1, E. JEHIN6, M. KUZUHARA16, A. W. MANN19, 20, G. W. MARCY1, P. A. MILES-PÁEZ4, 5, P. MONTAÑÉS-RODRÍGUEZ4, 5, F. MURGAS21, 22, N. NARITA23, 24, 25, G. NOWAK4, 5, M. ONITSUKA23, 24, M. PAEGERT12, V. VAN EYLEN14, J. N. WINN3, L. YU3. Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal, 2015 September 1 ABSTRACT We present the discovery of a transiting exoplanet candidate in the K2 Field-1 with an orbital period of 9.1457 hr: K2-22b. The highly variable transit depths, ranging from ∼0% to 1.3%, are suggestive of a planet that is disintegrating via the emission of dusty effluents. We characterize the host star as an M-dwarf with Teff ≃ 3800 K. We have obtained ground-based transit measurements with several 1-m class telescopes and with the GTC. These observations (1) improve the transit ephemeris; (2) confirm the variable nature of the transit depths; (3) indicate variations in the transit shapes; and (4) demonstrate clearly that at least on one occasion the transit depths were significantly wavelength dependent. The latter three effects tend to indicate extinction of starlight by dust rather than by any combination of solid bodies. The K2 observations yield a folded light curve with lower time resolution but with substantially better statistical precision compared with the ground-based observations. We detect a significant “bump” just after the transit egress, and a less significant bump just prior to transit ingress. We interpret these bumps in the context of a planet that is not only likely streaming a dust tail behind it, but also has a more prominent leading dust trail that precedes it. This effect is modeled in terms of dust grains that can escape to beyond the planet’s Hill sphere and effectively undergo ‘Roche lobe overflow,’ even though the planet’s surface is likely underfilling its Roche lobe by a factor of 2. Subject headings: planetary systems—planets and satellites: detection, atmospheres 1 Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; [email protected] 2 NASA Sagan Fellow 3 Department of Physics, and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA, [email protected] 4 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 5 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 6 Août 17, B-4000 Liège, Belgium 6 Institut d’Astrophysique et Géophysique, Université de Liège, allée du 7 Visidyne, Inc., 111 South Bedford St., Suite 103, Burlington, MA 01803, USA; [email protected] 8 Dipartimento di Fisica, Universitá di Torino, via P. Giuria 1, I-10125, Torino, Italy 9 Landessternwarte Königstuhl, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Königstuhl 12, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany 10 Okayama Astrophysical Observatory, National Astronomical Obser- vatory of Japan, Asakuchi, Okayama 719-0232, Japan 11 Institut de Ciències de l’Espai (CSIC-IEEC), Campus UAB, Facultat de Ciències, Torre C5, parell, 2a pl., E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain 12 Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 13 Fisk University, Nashville, TN 37208 14 Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 15 Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Hawaii, 1680 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA and Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility at the University of Hawaii. 16 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Tech- nology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan 17 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cam- bridge, MA 02138 18 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 19 Harlan J. Smith Fellow 20 Department of Astronomy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA 21 Univ. Grenoble Alpes,IPAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France 22 CNRS, IPAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France 23 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 24 SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), 2-21- 1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 25 Astrobiology Center, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 2 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 1. INTRODUCTION The Kepler mission (Borucki et al. 2010) has revolutionized the field of exoplanets, with some 4000 planet candidates dis- covered to date (Mullally et al. 2015), of which at least 1000 have been confirmed (Lissauer et al. 2014, Rowe et al. 2014). With the original objective of discovering Earth-size planets in the habitable zone of their host stars, the telescope was bound to also improve our understanding of close-in rocky planets (Jackson et al. 2009; Schlaufman et al. 2010). In- deed, the first Kepler rocky planet, Kepler-10b, had an orbital period of only 20 hr (Batalha et al. 2011). The smallest planet with a well measured mass and radius, Kepler-78b, also has a very short orbital period of 8.5 hr (Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2013), which was instrumental in measuring its small mass of 1.7 Earth masses (Howard et al. 2013, Pepe et al. 2013). In spite of the falloff in the numbers of Kepler exoplanet candidates at short periods, there are 106 well vetted candidates with or- bital periods shorter than one day (hereafter “USPs”; Sanchis- Ojeda et al. 2014), and most of them seem to be smaller than twice the size of Earth. Not included among the above lists are two special transit- ing exoplanets that are thought to be disintegrating via dusty effluents (Rappaport et al. 2012; Rappaport et al. 2014). In both cases it is inferred that the planets are trailed by a dust tail whose dynamics are influenced by radiation pressure on the dust grains. This leads to transit profiles characterized by a pronounced depression in flux after the planet has moved off of the stellar disk (i.e., a post-transit depression). In the case of KIC 12557548b (Rapapport et al. 2012; hereafter ‘KIC 1255b’) the transit depths range from ∼1.2% down to . 0.1% in an highly erratic manner, while for KOI 2700b (KIC 8639908; Rappaport et al. 2014) the transit depths are observed to be slowly decreasing in depth over the course of the fours years of Kepler observations. The fact that these ‘disintegrating’ planets are relatively rare (2 of 4000 Kepler planets) is likely due to the conditions required for their ex- istence and detection, namely high surface equilibrium tem- peratures and very low surface gravity, and a possibly short disintegration lifetime of only 10-100 Myr (see, e.g., Rappa- port et al. 2012; Perez-Becker & Chiang 2013). The main Kepler mission had an abrupt ending when two reactions wheels failed by March 2013. The reaction wheels are very important to maintain the telescope pointing in a given direction, and the telescope could no longer point to- ward the original Kepler field. The problem was partially by- passed by designing a new mission, called “K2”, in which the telescope would point toward a different field of view along the ecliptic plane every three months (Howell et al. 2014); the spacecraft stability is improved by equalizing the Sun’s radiation pressure forces on the solar panels. The unfortunate demise of the reaction wheels that put an end to the main mis- sion, also opened the possibility for new discoveries of planets orbiting brighter stars since thousands of new bright stars are observed in each field. In the short lifespan of this new mission, there have been several papers describing techniques to produce light curves (Vanderburg & Johnson 2014; Aigrain et al. 2015; Foreman- Mackey et al. 2015), and planet discoveries like a super- Earth transiting a bright host star (HIP 116454, Vanderburg et al. 2015), a triple planet system orbiting a bright M-dwarf (K2-3, Crossfield et al. 2015), and a pair of gas giants near a 3:2 mean motion resonance (EPIC 201505350, Armstrong et al. 2015b), with almost 20 confirmed K2 planets discovered to date (Montet et al. 2015). There have also been several catalogs of variable stars and eclipsing binaries (Armstrong et al. 2015a; LaCourse et al. 2015). This paper is the first in a series describing our discoveries using the K2 public data releases. The name of the project, “ESPRINT”, stands for "Equipo de Seguimiento de Planetas Rocosos INterpretando sus Tránsitos", which in English means "Follow-up team of rocky planets via the interpretation of their transits". In this work we focus on the surprising discovery of another one of these candidate disintegrating planets, this one in the K2 Field 1 which contains only 21,647 target stars (close to an order of magnitude fewer than in the prime Kepler field). Even more impressive, this particular short-period exoplanet appears to have a dominant leading dust tail and possibly an additional trailing one, a phenomenon not seen before in as- trophysics. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we summarize the observations taken with the K2 mission and describe how this particular object was found. In Sec- tion 3 we describe the variable transit depths, the timing anal- ysis, and the unusual transit profile that cannot be explained by a solid body. We present and discuss 15 transit measure- ments that were made in follow-up ground-based observations in Section 4. We analyze the properties of the host star based on a number of ground-based imaging and spectral observa- tions in Section 5. In Section 6 we set significant constraints on the radial velocity variations in the host star. We discuss the wavelength dependence of the transits observed with the GTC in Section 7. We summarize why the host of the transits is the bright target star and not its much fainter companion in Section 8. In Section 9 we interpret all the observations in terms of a model in which the planet is disintegrating, and discuss why the different characteristics and environment of K2-22b could lead to a dominant leading dust tail. Finally, in Section 10 we present a summary and conclusions and point toward new lines of research that could improve our under- standing of how disintegrating planets form and evolve. 2. K2 DATA PROCESSING The target star, with EPIC number 201637175 (from now on named K2-22), was selected as one of the 21,647 stars in Field 1 to be observed in the long cadence mode of the K2 mission (Howell et al. 2014). During the period from 2014 May 30 to 2014 August 20, a total of 3877 images of 15 × 15 pixels were recorded by the Kepler telescope, with a typi- cal cadence of 29.42 minutes. The data were sent to NASA Ames, subsequently calibrated, including cosmic ray removal (Howell et al. 2014), and uploaded to the public K2 MAST archive in late 2014 December. The data were then down- loaded from the MAST archive and utilized for the analysis presented in this work. The discovery of K2-22b is part of the larger ESPRINT col- laboration to detect and quickly characterize interesting plan- etary systems discovered using the K2 public data. In this sec- tion we highlight the way in which we produce light curves for all the observed stars, how this object was identified as part of the survey, and how we produced a better quality light curve for this particular object once the transits had been detected. 2.1. ESPRINT Photometric Pipeline Our photometric pipeline follows the steps of similar ef- forts published to date (Vanderburg & Johnson 2014; Cross- field et al. 2015; Aigrain et al. 2015; Foreman-Mackey et al. 2015; Lund et al. 2015) that describe how to efficiently ex- tract light curves from the calibrated pixel level data archived K2-22b 3 on MAST. The ingredients to generate the light curves, with our own choice described, are: • Aperture selection: Our apertures have irregular shapes, which are based on the amount of light that a certain pixel receives above the background level. We selected this type of aperture to capture as much light as possible while reducing the number of pixels used, which in turn reduces the noise induced by a large background correction. Based on experiments we car- ried out on the engineering data release, selected pixels must be 30% higher than the background level (esti- mated from an outlier corrected median of all the pix- els in the image) in 50% of the images in the case of a star brighter than Kepler magnitude Kp = 11.5. For stars fainter than magnitude Kp = 14, the selected pix- els must be 4% higher than the background. For stars of intermediate magnitudes, a linear interpolation of these two thresholds is used. A simple algorithm groups con- tiguous pixels in different apertures , and the target star aperture is selected to be the one that contains the tar- get star pixel position (obtained from the FITS head- ers). This type of aperture is similar to the ones used by Lund et al. (2015), and quite different from the circular apertures used in many of the other pipelines. • Thruster event removal: As highlighted in Vanderburg & Johnson (2014), every 6 hours the telescope rolls to maintain the targets on the defined set of pixels that are downloaded, in what is known as a ‘thruster event’. We recognized these events by calculating the cen- troid motion of a particularly well behaved star (EPIC 201918073), and selected those moments where the po- sition of the star jumps much more than usual (in the case of these stars, 0.1 pixels in the x direction). The images obtained during thruster events are removed from the analysis. • Data slicing: We split our dataset into eleven differ- ent segments chosen to have a length of approximately 7 days, but also to contain an integer number of tele- scope roll cycles. The first segment and the one after a large gap (in the middle of the dataset) are not used in the global search since they are poorly behaved in some cases, with systematic effects induced by thermal changes that appear after reorienting the telescope. • Systematics removal: We calculate the centroid po- sitions and obtain a fourth-order polynomial that de- scribes the movement of the star in the x and y coordi- nates. This polynomial fit is used to determine a new set of coordinates, in which the star moves only along one direction. The fluxes are then decorrelated first against time and then against this moving coordinate, using a fourth-order polynomial in each case. This process is repeated 3 times, and the results are very robust against problems caused by the presence of low-frequency as- trophysical sources of noise (see Vanderburg & John- son 2014 for a more detailed description on how this process works). This recipe was followed to generate the light curves of the 21,647 stars in Field-1. Among them, the light curve for EPIC 20163717 can be seen in the top panel of Fig. 1. It is interest- ing to note that since our apertures depend on the amount of background light, which is increasing over the course of the observations, the number of pixels in the aperture decreases with time. This is a desired effect, since it tends to balance the increase of background light in the aperture by reducing the number of pixels, and therefore changes in the flux scatter are less severe. These light curves are generally analyzed using two differ- ent search algorithms: a more standard BLS routine (Kovács et al. 2002; Jenkins et al. 2010; Ofir 2014) to search for plan- ets with orbital periods longer than 1 day, and a more special- ized FFT pipeline used to detect planets with orbital periods shorter than 1-2 days (Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2014). In this case, due to the short orbital period of the signal, we describe only the FFT search. 2.2. Detection via the FFT technique Our target star K2-22 was detected as part of our search for ultra-short period planets in the K2 Field-1 dataset using the FFT technique. The routine automatically identifies those objects for which a main frequency and at least one harmonic can be distinguished above the level noise in the FFT power spectrum (see Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2014 for details). A total of 2628 objects were identified in that way, but a large fraction of them were caused by improper corrections of the 6-hour roll of the Kepler telescope. These false detections are easy to remove since their main frequency is always related to the fundamental roll frequency of 4.08 rolls per day, although this simple removal clearly affects the completeness of our search. A total of 390 objects were selected for visual inspection, and among them K2-22 was selected as the most promising ultra- short orbital period planet candidate. The FFT by which this object was discovered is shown in Fig. 2. Note the prominent peak at 2.62 cycles/day which is the base frequency corresponding to the 9.1457-hour period, as well as the next 8 higher harmonics which lie below the Nyquist limit. The overall slowly decaying Fourier ampli- tudes with harmonic number is characteristic of short-period planet transits. 2.3. Individualized aperture photometry Our method for generating the light curves relies on a one- to-one relationship between the raw flux counts and the posi- tion of the star on the CCD chip. Any source of astrophysical variability could distort this relationship, and this is the case for both stellar activity induced signals and transits. A closer inspection of the raw light curve of K2-22 shows long-term trends that do not correlate with the centroid motion, and are likely due to the slow rotation of the host star. These trends are removed automatically as we fit a fourth-order polynomial in time to each of the 7-day segments, which effectively re- moves variability on scales longer than approximately 2 days (see upper panel of Fig. 1). In order to remove the effects of the transits, we first folded the original light curve given the period obtained from the FFT, after which we identified those orbital phases where no transit is expected. We then ran our photometric pipeline again, using the same aperture (see Fig. 3) but only using the out-of-transit flux measurements to find the best fit polynomi- als to correct for both temporal and telescope motion varia- tions. This process reduced the photometric scatter, and en- couraged us to try different approaches to continue improving the light curve. We tried different combinations of polynomial orders and also different approaches to defining the apertures, 4 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 FIG. 2.— Discovery Fourier transform of the flux data showing strong peaks at the 9.147-hour period and all 8 harmonics that are below the Nyquist limit- ing frequency. The arrows mark two additional harmonics aliased around the Nyquist limit. FIG. 1.— Lightcurve of K2-22 in time bins equal to the half-hour Kepler long-cadence sampling time. Top panel: Light curve of the form used in our global search for USP planets. Middle panel: Light curve processed with a modified algorithm that better preserves stellar activity. Lower panel: Au- tocorrelation function, with a vertical line representing the inferred rotation period of the star. but none of them improved the quality of the light curve (see top panel of Fig. 1). After all the corrections, the final scatter per 30 minute cadence is 650 ppm, which is near the mean un- certainty obtained with our photometric pipeline for the typi- cal K2 15th magnitude star. We also tried to produce a light curve in which other astro- physical signals would be preserved (e.g., starspot rotation). During the process of detrending each of the 11 segments of data, we saved the coefficients of the fourth-order polynomial in time, and used them to reconstruct the signal again after removing the centroid motion artifact. Since the aperture is FIG. 3.— K2 image of the object K2-22. A customized aperture is defined based on the amount of light of each pixel, and level of background light. The blue star represents the expected position of the target star, and the Kepler magnitude obtained from the EPIC catalog. individually defined for each segment, we had to adjust the mean flux level of each segment to create a continuous light curve. This astrophysically more accurate light curve is also shown in Fig. 1, and exhibits a clear signal of starspots with a rotation that could either be 7-8 days or twice this value. The shorter quasi-periodicity would typically arise when the star has two active longitudes separated by 180 degrees in lon- gitude. We used an autocorrelation function to confirm this suspicion (see lower panel of Fig. 1), and measured a rota- tion period of 15.3 days, following the techniques described in McQuillan et al. (2013). 3. TRANSIT PARAMETERS AND DEPTH VARIABILITY In this section we describe the transits of K2-22b as ob- served by K2, with particular emphasis on the characteristics that deviate from the transits of a more typical planet. K2-22b 5 those cases, we were left with a reduced sample of 60 well detected transits. In addition to the best fit transit time, we es- timated the formal uncertainty by finding the interval of times where the standard χ2 function is within 1 of its minimum value, where a constant value of 650 ppm is used for the un- certainties in the flux. The transit times (including uncertain- ties) obtained in this manner are fit to a linear function, and the O- C (‘observed minus calculated’) residuals of that fit are displayed in Fig. 5. A clear excess of scatter (above the formal statistical uncertainties) is detected, with a best-fit standard χ2 of 480 for 60 transit times. Formal uncertainties, however, un- derestimate the true uncertainties when the model parameters are correlated, as could be the case here since we have re- moved a local linear trend for each transit which is known to be correlated with the transit time. We further examine this excess scatter below with simulations of the data train. We now use the new orbital ephemeris to fix the time of each transit, and repeat the process but now fitting for the transit depths. These transit depths are significantly differ- ent from one transit to the next, and the depths range from a maximum of 1.3% to 0.27% which is close to the photometric detectability limit of our time series for individual flux points. We can also see in Fig. 5 that the transit depths do not strongly correlate with the O - C timing residuals. These erratic tran- sit depth variations are quite reminiscent of those exhibited by KIC 1255b (Rappaport et al. 2012; Croll et al. 2014), and cover much the same range in depths. We checked for periodicities in the measured transit depths and timing residuals using a Lomb-Scargle periodogram, but no significant peak was detected with a false alarm probability smaller than 1%. We also attempted to constrain the true size of the planet by studying the shallowest K2 transits. We revis- ited the discarded transits, and selected the 6 shallowest cases in which the transit observations were complete (no thruster events). The mean depth of these transits is 0.14 ± 0.03%, which, given the radius of the star (see section 5.2), translates into an upper bound of 2.5 ± 0.4 R⊕ on the planet radius. Even though the transit depth variations described above are later confirmed by ground-based observations, there is a potential concern that the variability could have been caused by the relatively comparable transit and sampling timescales. In this same regard, it is also possible that some or all of the excess variations in the O - C scatter (see Fig. 5) over those expected from statistical fluctuations are due to the relatively short transit duration compared with the LC integration time. We have therefore carried out extensive numerical simulations of these effects. The simulations of the depth and transit-time variations are based on a model that has a simple box transit profile which is integrated over the 30 minute LC time, and includes a sinu- soid (and its first harmonic) to represent the rotating starspot activity. The amplitude of the sinusoids and the rotation pe- riod are fixed at 1% and 15 days, respectively. The duration of the model transit is fixed at 50 min (see Sect. 4). The model is evaluated at the same times as the K2 observations, and only the same 60 transit windows are analyzed to ensure that the simulations represent a similar dataset to the one used in this paper. There are a total of four different numerical ex- periments, each one repeated many times, in which we either include starspots or not, and we either have a constant transit depth or depths drawn from a Gaussian distribution of a given variance, but always with a mean of 0.5%. In all cases a fixed orbital ephemeris is used. White noise of 700 ppm per LC FIG. 4.— Zoomed version of Fig. 1 where the variability of the transit depths in much easier to see. Each vertical red line represents an expected transit time. 3.1. Individual transit times and depths The top panel of Fig. 1 shows the full data set from the K2 Field-1 observations covering an interval of ∼80 days. It is apparent that there are sharp dips in intensity whose depths are highly and erratically variable. In Fig. 4 we can see a zoom in on two weeks of observations. The individual transits are now quite apparent, and the depth variations are dramatically evident. In order to analyze these variations, we first folded the light curve with the period obtained from the FFT, after removing any long-period signals. We did this by fitting for local lin- ear trends using a total of 5 hours of observations right before and after each transit. We then fit the folded light curve with a simple idealized transit profile comprised of 3 straight-line segments: a flat bottom and sloping ingress and egress with the same slope magnitudes, hereafter referred to as the “three- segment (symmetric) model”. This is very similar to the sim- pler ‘box model’, but with non-zero ingress and egress times. We forced the fit to have a duration of at least 5 minutes on the lowest part of the transit, to make sure that the final fit did not look like a triangle. This fit gave a mean transit depth of 0.5%, and a total duration of 1 hour and 10 minutes. Given that the cadence of the observations is approximately 30 min- utes, the real mean duration of the K2 transits must be close to 40 minutes, in agreement with what is expected of an USP planet orbiting an M-dwarf. This is confirmed by our follow- up ground-based observations with their better temporal reso- lution (see Sect. 4). With the mean transit profile and a good estimate for the or- bital ephemeris, we fit each of the 190 individual K2 transits with the same three-segment model, allowing only the tran- sit time to vary. In the process, we evaluated the robustness of the detection of each of the individual transits. In some cases, the depth is so low that the transit cannot be detected, whereas on other occasions the transit occurs during a thruster event, so there are no data. In rare cases, the transit consists of only a single flux point, which does not allow for a clear determination of the transit time or depth. After removing all 6 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 FIG. 5.— In depth analysis of individual K2 transits. Upper left panel: Residuals of the K2 transit times with respect to a linear ephemeris, where the error bars reflect only the formal uncertainties. The best solution has a final χ2 of 480 for 60 transit times. Our simulations show that this excess of scatter comes from systematic uncertainties induced by the poor time resolution compared to the duration of the K2 transits. Lower left: The individual transit depths with time; these confirm the erratic variations in the transit depths. Upper right: Scatter plot showing that there is no significant correlation between the timing residuals and the transit depths. Lower right: the distribution of the 60 well-measured transit depths. This distribution is biased towards deeper transits, as transits shallower than 0.2% were not analyzed due to the low S/N. sample is added. The simulated datasets are then processed with the same pipeline used as was used in this work for the K2 data. The main conclusions from these simulations are: (i) The formal uncertainties in the ‘measured’ transit depths (∼0.05%) are indeed underestimates of the actual uncertain- ties. The simulations using a constant depth have recovered depths with a scatter of 0.1%. This is likely the result of a combination of systematic effects induced by the short dura- tion of the transits and the white noise terms. The simulations show that an actual scatter in the depths greater than 0.15% is easily recoverable. The scatter of our K2 depths is 0.2%, so we conclude that it is real. The ground based observations confirm this. (ii) The formal uncertainties also underestimate the true uncertainties of the transit times (defined as the scat- ter of measured times after removing a best linear trend). This effect is worse in the presence of starspots, but it does not de- pend on the transit depth variations. The effect can be large enough to explain all the scatter observed in the K2 timing analysis and therefore this scatter is not significant. We have added a systematic uncertainty in quadrature to the timings of 3 minutes, chosen to provide a best-fit reduced χ2 of 1. (iii) Our treatment of stellar spots does not induce detectable depth variations (see Kawahara et al. 2013; Croll et al. 2015), as ex- pected, mostly because we do not have the precision to detect them. 3.2. Deviation from a standard transit profile A fold of the activity corrected data (see section 2.3) about the period we determined of 9.145704 hours is presented in Fig. 6. The overall crudely triangular shaped transit profile is the result of a convolution of the intrinsic shape and the LC sampling time (see also Sects. 4 and 7). The depth of the folded profile is 0.6%, and of course, this represents an aver- age of the highly variable depths. The red curve is the mean out-of-transit normalized flux (averaged for orbital phases be- tween - 0.5 to - 0.25, and from 0.25 to 0.5). Note the clear positive “bump” in flux just after the transit egress and the smaller, but still marginally significant, bump just prior to ingress. These are significant at the 6-σ and 2-σ confidence limits, respectively. These “bumps”, which are not normal features of exoplanet transits, will be important for understanding the basic nature of the transits (see Sect. 9). We call these features the “pre- ingress bump” and the “post-egress bump”. Even in the cases of KIC 1255b and KOI 2700b, the other two exoplanets which appear to have dusty tails, the main distinguishing feature of their transit profiles is a post-transit depression (Rappaport et al. 2012; Rappaport et al. 2014) which is attributed to a trailing comet-like dust tail. In addition, KIC 1255b exhibits a pre-ingress “bump” which has been attributed to forward scattering in the dust tail near the head of the dust cloud (see, e.g., Rappaport et al. 2012; Brogi et al. 2012; Budaj 2013; van Werkhoven et al. 2014). By contrast, the transit profile of K2-22b 7 K2-22b has no post-egress depression, and the most promi- nent bump comes after the egress, rather than before. These features will be crucial to the interpretation of the dust “tail” in this system. impact parameter of b = 0.68 ± 0.06 (see Table 4) and a mean depth of (R′ p can be understood as the mean effective radius of the dust grains. p/R∗)2 = 0.55%, where R′ 3.3. Verification With Independently Processed K2 Data We have also used the Vanderburg & Johnson (2014) flux time series data set for K2-22 to check against the results of our own pipeline. With the application of a simple high-pass filter, this independently processed light curve looks nearly identical to the one shown in the upper panel of Fig. 1. A fold of the data about the period we have determined yields a transit profile that is essentially the same as that shown in Fig. 6, including the appearance of a convincing post-egress bump, and a somewhat less significant pre-eclipse bump. To the extent that our pipeline and that of Vanderburg & John- son (2014) are independent, this is a satisfying test that our processing has introduced no artifacts into the lightcurve. 4. GROUND-BASED TRANSIT OBSERVATIONS A total of 12 transits were obtained from the ground using 1-m class telescopes, and the observations are summarized in Table 1. The first observations were taken with the 1.2- meter telescope at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory (FLWO) on Mt. Hopkins (AZ) using the KeplerCam instru- ment, which has a single 4K × 4K Fairchild 486 CCD with a 23′.1 × 23′.1 field of view. We successfully observed three different transits with photometry in the Sloan i’ filter. We also conducted a follow-up transit observation with the Okayama 1.88-m telescope using the NIR camera ISLE (Yanagisawa et al. 2006), and adopting a similar observing scheme to that described in Fukui et al. 2014, we studied the transit of the target in J-band. We only slightly defocused the stellar images, but due to the faintness of the target and refer- ence star, the raw counts were well within the detector’s linear range. The typical FWHM of the target star’s PSF was ∼ 14 pixels, which corresponds to ∼ 3.5′′. We obtained two additional transits with the IAC-80 (80- cm) telescope at the Observatorio de IzaÃ´sa, in the Canary Islands. We used the wide field CAMELOT camera, with a FOV of 10.4′ × 10.4′, with observations taken in the i-band. No defocussing was applied. Weather conditions were clear and stable through the two nights. A total of six transits were observed with the 0.6-m TRAP- PIST robotic telescope (TRAnsiting Planets and PlanetesI- mals Small Telescope), located at ESO La Silla Observatory (Chile). TRAPPIST is equipped with a thermoelectrically- cooled 2K × 2K CCD, which has a pixel scale of 0.65′′ that translates into a 22′ × 22′ field of view. For details of TRAP- PIST, see Gillon et al. (2011) and Jehin et al. (2011). The ob- servations were obtained through a blue-blocking filter26 that has a transmittance of > 90% from 500 nm to beyond 1000 nm, without any additional defocus due to the faintness of the target star. The procedures for the observation and data reduc- tion are similar to those described by Gillon et al. (2013) and we refer to this paper for further details. Finally, additional observations were taken in queue mode with OSIRIS@GTC on three different nights (see Table 1), covering three complete transits of K2-22b. A spectroscopic time series was taken in staring mode, starting ≈ 1 h before the ingress, and finishing ≈ 1 h after the egress. The observing logs are summarized in Table 1. Even though the GTC data 26 http://www.astrodon.com/products/filters/exoplanet/ FIG. 6.— Folded light curve of K2-22b for an orbital period of 9.14570 hours. The folded data have been averaged into 3.7-minute bins. The em- pirical out of transit rms variations in the flux are 195 ppm. As explained in the text there is a positive “bump” in flux just after the transit egress and a smaller, but still marginally significant, bump just prior to ingress. The red horizontal lines represent the mean out-of-transit normalized flux. The black horizontal bar indicates the LC time of 29.4 minutes, and gives an indication of the inherent temporal resolution of the light curve Finally, even though we believe the transit is due to a dust tail, as a baseline reference model we attempted to fit a stan- dard transit profile of a solid planet over a limb-darkened star (Mandel & Agol 2002) to our folded light curve. The high distortion of the transit light curve due to the 30 minute sam- pling precludes obtaining precise transit parameters, but we were able to constrain the scaled semi-major axis from the transit itself to be d/R∗ = 4.2+0.15 - 0.5 , with the uncertainties es- timated from an MCMC analysis. In fact, from the stellar properties obetained in section 5.2, and Kepler’s 3rd law, we can make a better direct estimate of d/R∗ = 3.3 ± 0.2, which is compatible with the transit fit. We ran a final transit model with a Gaussian prior on d/R∗ based on the inferred stellar density, with mean value of 3.3 and a standard deviation of 0.2. This, in turn, allowed us to estimate a mean K2 total transit duration (first to fourth contact) of 46 ± 1 minutes, an 8 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 were taken in low-resolution spectral mode, for the purpose of transit timing, we used the data integrated over wavelength (i.e., an effective white light transit). The spectral dependence of the transits is discussed in detail in Sect. 7. In all, 15 transits were measured from the ground. A log of these 15 observations is given in Table 1. Each of the above instruments has a different procedure for reducing the light curves, and we refer to the corresponding literature for a more detailed explanation (Okayama: Fukui et al. 2011; TRAPPIST: Gillon et al. 2013; FLWO: Holman et al. 2006; IAC80: Lázaro et al. 2015; GTC: see Sec. 7). All transit light curves were obtained by comparing the fluxes of the host star to a reference light curve made by combining up to several comparison stars. They were all adjusted for dif- ferential airmass corrections and a second-order polynomial was fitted to the out-of-transit part of the light curves to re- move long-term trends. The times of observation for all light curves were transformed into BJD (TDB format, see Eastman et al. 2010) to compare them with the K2 observations. The 15 transit profiles measured from the ground are pre- sented in Fig. 7. The profiles were fit with the same simple three-segment transit model used in the K2 data analysis. The parameters were transit depth, time of transit, transit dura- tion, and ingress time. We also added two parameters to fit for any fiducial linear trends with time. In several cases a transit fit barely represents an improvement over a straight- line fit, whereas in some cases a deep transit is detected, con- firming the depth variations (see Fig. 7). We first scaled the uncertainties in the flux measurements to be equal to the stan- dard deviation of the flux residuals with respect to the best fit model. Correlated noise was taken into account using the time-averaging method, in which the ratio of the standard de- viation of the time-averaged residuals and the standard devia- tion expected assuming white noise is calculated over a range of timescales (Pont et al. 2006; Winn et al. 2008). In our case, we obtained the final values of this β parameter as the mean of the ratios with timescales from 10 to 30 minutes (see Table 1), and multiplied the initial uncertainty by β when es- timating the standard χ2 function. In those 9 cases where the transit fit improves the minimum χ2 by at least 35, an MCMC routine was used to estimate the uncertainties in the transit pa- rameters. The 9 new transit times obtained from the ground based observations are summarized in Table 2. We combined the K2 transit times with the new 9 transit times to obtain the final orbital ephemeris. The new transit times also show a high level of scatter (χ2 = 30 for 9 O-C determinations). The O-C values for all the well measured K2 and ground- based transits are summarized in Fig. 8 (left panel). We used these data to determine a best fit orbital period and its uncer- tainty (after multiplying by the square root of the reduced χ2). We repeated the process of fitting the O-C points, but this time with a quadratic function, to set upper bounds on the deriva- tive of the orbital period. The period and period derivative results are summarized in Table 4. The extra source of scatter in the ground-based transit tim- ings could be caused by changes in the shape of the transit light curve (see Croll et al. 2015). In principle these tim- ing variations should be accompanied by transit duration or shape variations, but our light curves are not precise enough to allow the detection of such correlated variations (see right panel of Fig. 8). We cannot discard the possibility that part of the scatter is due to the use of a symmetric transit profile to compute transit times, when indeed some of the transits appear slightly asymmetric. From this set of 9 high-quality ground-based transit measurements we obtained a weighted total transit duration average of 50 ± 2 min, slightly longer than the duration obtained from the K2 photometry. This dif- ference of 4 ± 2 minutes, can be explained by the non-zero ca- dence of the ground-based observations, which has not been taken into account in these fits. A final value of 48 ±3 minutes is quoted for the total transit duration in Table 4. 5. PROPERTIES OF THE HOST STAR 5.1. Imaging and color information An early inspection of the SDSS images of the target star, K2-22, showed that it is quite cool and likely an M star. The image also indicated the presence of a faint companion at a distance ∼2′′ in the South-West direction. We observed the target star and its companion with Hyper- Suprime Cam (HSC, Miyazaki et al. 2012) on the Subaru 8.2- m telescope on 25 January, 2015 (UT). The sky condition on that night was clear and photometric. The HSC is equipped with 116 fully-depleted-type 2048 × 4096 CCDs with a pixel scale of 0.17′′. We took images of 3 s and 60 s exposures through g-, i-, and z-band filters (see Fig. 9). The host star is saturated in i- and z-band with 60-s exposures, while the companion star is not clearly seen in the g-band image with 3- s exposure. We thus use the 60-s exposure images for g-band and 3-s exposure images for i- and z-band for the analysis presented here. The presence of a stellar companion can be problematic, particularly when the distance between the stars is smaller than the pixel size of Kepler. We measure the flux ratios of the companion to the host star in the HSC g-, i-, and z-band images (see Fig. 9) by using the DoPHOT program (Schechter et al. 1993), which performs PSF-fitting photometry while de- blending stars. The background star is situated at a distance of 1.91′′, with a position angle of 134 degrees west from north (see Table 3 for the coordinates). We obtain flux ratios of 4.0 ± 0.5%, 8.6 ± 0.5%, and 11.7 ± 0.5% for the g, i, and z bands, respectively, where the uncertainties have been in- creased to take into account systematic sources of noise. The contribution of the background star points toward a cooler and fainter companion. The bright star has been char- acterized as part of the K2-TESS catalog, in which effective temperatures are obtained from the colors of the stars (Stassun et al. 2014). The temperature reported there for the brighter target star is ∼ 3700 K, which means that both stars are likely to be dwarfs stars (see Sect. 5.2). The colors used in that anal- ysis could have been blended due to the proximity of the com- panion. We also obtained the ugriz SDSS magnitudes and the J 2MASS magnitude for both stars, confirming that the col- ors used in Stassun et al. (2014) were correct. We re-derived the flux ratios in g, i and z band (5.4%, 6.5% and 12% re- spectively) confirming the measurements obtained using the Subaru images. The minimum uncertainties used in the fits are 0.05 magnitudes to take into account systematic effects. Adopting the full line-of-sight extinction of AV = 0.17 based on the expected distance to the objects, and a log g of 5 due to their red colors and dwarf nature (see Sect. 5.2), we ob- tained temperatures of 3800 ± 150 K for the bright star and 3150 ± 200 K for its fainter companion. The magnitudes and colors of the two stars based on a com- bination of the SDSS, Subaru, and 2-MASS photometry are summarized in Table 3. K2-22b 9 GROUND BASED TRANSIT OBSERVATIONS OF K2-22B TABLE 1 Date [UT] Start End Epoch Telescope Instrument or filter Number of data points Median time between points [min] Airmassa σb [ppm] βb Sloan i’ J-band Sloan i’ Sloan i R1000R 07:30 14:40 07:13 02:33 03:15 03:24 02:16 02:32 00:10 03:24 05:22 03:27 02:27 04:38 02:00 12:45 18:23 12:06 05:55 06:45 09:35 07:06 06:28 03:30 06:42 12:30 07:39 05:24 08:48 05:37 2015 Jan 15 2015 Jan 17 2015 Jan 23 2015 Jan 27 2015 Jan 29 2015 Feb 02 2015 Feb 04 2015 Feb 12 2015 Feb 14 2015 Feb 15 2015 Feb 18 2015 Feb 23 2015 Feb 25 1 2015 Feb 26 1 2015 Mar 21 1 a The airmass range is shown as z0 → zmin → zfin, where z0 and zfin represent the airmass at the beginning and at the end of the night, respectively, and zmin represents the minimum airmass. b σ refers to the flux scatter respect to the best fit model, whereas β represents the level of correlated noise (see section 4). 1.89 → 1.15 → 1.25 2.32 → 1.18 → 1.69 1.78 → 1.15 → 1.24 1.22 → 1.13 → 1.28 1.12 → 1.11 → 1.53 2.34 → 1.18 → 1.42 1.18 → 1.11 → 1.79 2.60 → 1.18 → 1.18 1.45 → 1.11 → 1.12 1.12 → 1.12 → 2.07 1.88 → 1.15 → 1.90 1.50 → 1.18 → 1.30 1.71 → 1.18 → 1.18 1.23 → 1.18 → 1.69 1.43 → 1.18 → 1.26 1.2 m FLWO Okayama 1.2 m FLWO IAC-80 GTC TRAPPIST IAC-80 TRAPPIST GTC GTC 1.2 m FLWO TRAPPIST TRAPPIST TRAPPIST TRAPPIST 2800 3000 3500 4070 570 5500 4300 4070 920 690 2270 2600 3230 2760 2800 Blue blocking Blue blocking Blue blocking Blue blocking 136 102 126 117 44 314 260 207 40 38 188 213 137 202 182 595 601 616 626 634 642 647 668 673 676 684 697 702 705 765 2.3 2.1 2.3 1.7 4.6 1.1 1.1 1.1 5.4 5.4 2.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 1 1 1.24 1.13 1.15 1.00 1.52 1.46 1.26 1.50 1.38 Blue blocking Sloan i Blue blocking R1000R R1000R Sloan i’ TABLE 2 GROUND BASED TRANSIT TIMES Epoch Time of transit (BJD) Uncertainty (days) 595 626 634 647 673 676 684 697 705 2457037.8608 2457049.6705 2457052.7269 2457057.6831 2457067.5839 2457068.7295 2457071.7778 2457076.7327 2457079.7805 See section 4 for details. 0.0007 0.0022 0.0008 0.0021 0.0015 0.0005 0.0018 0.0012 0.0012 PROPERTIES OF THE HOST STAR AND COMPANION TABLE 3 Parameter (units) Host star Companion 11:17:55.763 +02:37:05.48 21.68 ± 0.17 19.61 ± 0.05 18.79 ± 0.05 17.34 ± 0.05 16.34 ± 0.05 14.87 ± 0.05 14.27 ± 0.05 13.93 ± 0.05 3290 ± 120 11:17:55.856 +02:37:06.79 19.07 ± 0.05 16.44 ± 0.05 15.01 ± 0.05 14.38 ± 0.05 14.05 ± 0.05 12.74 ± 0.05 12.09 ± 0.05 11.91 ± 0.05 3830 ± 100 4.65 ± 0.12 0.03 ± 0.08 0.60 ± 0.07 0.57 ± 0.06 0.063+0.008 - 0.007 M0V ±1 225 ± 50 RA (J2000) DEC (J2000) u-mag (SDSS) g-mag (SDSS) r-mag (SDSS) i-mag (SDSS) z-mag (SDSS) J (2MASS) H (2MASS) KS (2MASS) Teff (K) log g [Fe/H] M∗ (R⊙) R∗ (M⊙) L∗ (L⊙) Spec Type Distance (pc) The magnitudes and colors are taken from a combination of the SDSS and 2-MASS photometry. The stellar parame- ters are inferred from the combined analyses of the Keck- HIRES, IRTF-SpeX, and UH88-SNIFS spectra. See sec- tion 5 for details. 0.06 ± 0.20 0.27 ± 0.05 0.30 ± 0.08 0.010+0.007 - 0.005 M4V ±1 225 ± 50 ... TABLE 4 PROPERTIES OF K2-22B b Parameter Orbital Perioda (days) Orbital Period (hr) Transit centera (BJD) Porb/Porb (yr- 1)a Total transit durationa (min) d/R∗ Impact parameter, bc d (AU) Rp (R⊕)d Mp (MJ)e θ∗ Mdust (g s- 1)g ℓ2 (leading tail only; units of R∗)h agrain (µm)h Impact parameter, bh ρ1/ρ2 (two-tail model, ℓ1 = ℓ2)h f Value 0.381078 ± 0.000001 9.145872 ± 0.000024 2456811.1208 ± 0.0006 . 3.5 × 10- 7 48 ± 3 3.3 ± 0.2 0.68 ± 0.06 0.0088 ± 0.0008 < 2.5 ± 0.4 < 1.4 17◦ ± 1.5◦ ≈ 2 × 1011 0.19 - 0.48 0.3 - 0.5 0.42 - 0.78 < 0.5 a Derived from the K2 and ground-based observations. b Based on the mass and radius of the host star given in Table 3 and Kepler’s 3rd law. c Derived from the K2 observations using a standard Mandel & Agol (2002) fit to a hard-body transit. d Based on the shallowest K2 transits. e 2-σ limit based on the Keck RVs. f Estimate of the half angle subtended by the star at the position of the planet. g Following the type of estimate made in Appendix D of Rap- paport et al. (2014) h 90% confidence limits based on the models of section 9. The leading and trailing tails are assumed to have exponential scale lengths and maximum optical thicknesses, ℓ2, ℓ1, ρ2, and ρ1, respectively. 5.2. Spectral Studies 5.2.1. NOT-FIES spectrum An exploratory spectrum was obtained on 13 Feb 2015 with the FIbre-fed Échelle Spectrograph (Frandsen & Lind- berg 1999, Telting et al. 2014) mounted at the 2.56-m Nordic Optical Telescope of Roque de los Muchachos Observatory (La Palma, Spain). We used the 1.3′′ Med-Res fibre which provides a resolving power of R = 46000 over the spectral 10 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 FIG. 7.— Fifteen transits of K2-22b observed from the ground, plotted to the same vertical scale. The transit models are each vertically offset by 0.02 for clarity in presentation. When necessary, the observations are binned to have a cadence close to 5 minutes. In spite of the weaker statistics for some of these, it is apparent that the transit depths vary considerably. FIG. 8.— Left panel: Timing residuals after removing the best fit linear orbital ephemeris. The uncertainties on the K2 timings have been increased to take into account systematic effects. Right panel: The uncertainties in the transit durations are too high to allow for a detection of a possible correlation between transit duration and transit time. K2-22b 11 ination from the calibration lamp. The photospheric parameters of the template stars were ho- mogeneously derived from the SOPHIE spectra using the pro- cedure described in Maldonado et al. (2015), which relies on the ratios of pseudo-equivalent widths of different spec- tral features. Unfortunately, the low S/N ratio prevented us from directly applying this technique to the co-added HIRES spectrum of the target. Prior to the fitting procedure, the resolution of the tem- plate spectra was somewhat degraded to match that of the HIRES spectrograph (R = 60 000) – by convolving the SO- PHIE spectra with a Gaussian function mimicking the dif- ference between the two instrument profiles. A corrective radial velocity shift was estimated by cross-correlating the observed and template spectra. We restricted the spectral range over which the fit is performed to 5500–6800 Å and masked out the regions containing telluric lines. We se- lected the 5 best fitting templates and adopted the weighted means of their spectroscopic parameters as the final esti- mates for the target star. We found that the target star has an effective temperature of Teff = 3780 ± 90 K, surface grav- ity of log g = 4.65 ± 0.12 (log10 cm s- 2), and iron abundance of [Fe/H] = 0.05 ± 0.08 dex. We also set an upper limit of 1.5 km s- 1 on the projected rotation velocity v sin i⋆ by fitting the profile of several clean and unblended metal lines to the PHOENIX model spectrum (Husser et al. 2013) with the same parameters as the target star. Figure 10 shows the co-added HIRES spectrum in the spectal region around the Hα line, along with the best fitting SOPHIE template. FIG. 9.— Subaru/HSC+z image of K2-22 shows a secondary companion star ∼ 2′′ away, with a position angle of 134 degrees west from north. In this band, the flux ratio between the faint and bright star is 12%. range 3640–7360 Å. The FIES data revealed a single-lined spectrum. Although the low signal-to-noise ratio does not al- low us to perform a reliable spectral analysis, a comparison with a grid of stellar templates from (Valdes et al. 2004) and (Bochanski et al. 2007) confirmed that the host is a cold dwarf star. 5.2.2. Keck-HIRES spectra 5.2.3. IRTF-SpeX spectrum We also acquired five spectra of the host star with the Keck Telescope and HIRES spectrometer using the standard setup of the California Planet Search (CPS, Howard et al. 2010). Over the course of four nights, (5-8 Feb 2015) we observed under clear skies and average seeing (∼1.2′′). Exposure times of less than 5 minutes resulted in SNRs of 5-10 per pixel. Extensive scattered light and sky emission were unavoidable for exposures on 5 Feb 2015 due to the close proximity of the nearly full moon to the target star.All spectra were taken using the C2 decker, which is 0.87′′ wide by 14′′ long, resulting in a spectral resolution of R=60,000. The slit was oriented to minimize the amount of contamination from the companion star. We estimated the effective temperature Teff, surface gravity log g, iron abundance [Fe/H], and projected rotation veloc- ity v sin i⋆ of the host star from the co-added HIRES spec- trum, which has a S/N ratio of about 20 per pixel at 6000 Å. We used a modified version of the spectral analysis tech- nique described in Gandolfi et al. (2008), which is based on the use of stellar templates to simultaneously derive spectral type, luminosity class, and interstellar reddening from flux- calibrated, low-resolution spectra. We modified the code to fit the co-added HIRES spectrum to a grid of templates of M dwarfs recorded with the SOPHIE spectrograph (Bouchy et al. 2008). We retrieved from the SOPHIE archive27 the high-resolution (R = 75 000), high S/N ratio (>80) spectra of about 50 bright red dwarfs encompassing the spectral range K5–M3 V. The stars were selected from the compilation of (Lepine et al. 2013). We downloaded spectra with no simulta- neous thorium-argon observations, to avoid potential contam- 27 Available at http://atlas.obs-hp.fr/sophie/ A near-infrared spectrum of the star was also obtained using the updated SpeX (uSpeX) spectrograph (Rayner et al. 2003) on the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF). SpeX ob- servations were taken using the short cross-dispersed mode and the 0.3′′ × 15′′ slit, which provides simultaneous cover- age from 0.7 to 2.5 µm at R ≃ 2000. The slit was aligned to capture both the target and companion spectrum. The pair was nodded between two positions along the slit to subse- quently subtract the sky background. Ten spectra were taken following this pattern, which provided a final S/N of ≃ 100 per resolving element in the K-band for the primary, and ≃ 25 for the companion. The spectra were flat fielded, extracted, wavelength calibrated, and stacked using the SpeXTool pack- age (Cushing et al. 2004). An A0V-type star was observed immediately after the target, which was used to create a tel- luric correction using the xtellcor package (Vacca et al. 2003). We analyzed the SpeX spectra obtained for both the bright and faint star, and both show strong atomic and weak CO absorption, as is expected for dwarf stars. Comparison with dwarf and giant NIR templates from the IRTF library (Rayner et al. 2009) rule out the possibility of either component being evolved. Metallicity was derived from the SpeX data using the procedures from Mann et al (2013), who provide empirical re- lations between atomic features and M dwarf metallicity, cal- ibrated using wide binaries. Teff was calculated using the em- pirical calibration from Mann et al. (2013), which is based on stars with Teff determined from long-baseline optical interfer- ometry (Boyajian et al. 2012). This analysis yielded a metal- licity of 0.00±0.08 and a Teff of 3880±85 K for the primary; and a metallicity of 0.06±0.20 and a Teff of 3290±120 K for the companion. Both the metallicity and Teff determinations for the primary star are consistent with those derived from the 12 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 spread in rotation periods of stars in clusters (e.g., Reiners & Mohanty 2012). However, the observed rotation period of the target star, 15.3 days (see Sect. 2.3), sits slightly above the main period distribution of M dwarfs in the Hyades and Praesepe clusters (Delorme et al. 2011), possibly indicating an older age. On the other hand, McQuillan et al. (2013) finds a bimodal distribution of the rotation periods of field M dwarfs, likely associated with two populations with differ- ent median ages. K2-22 belongs to the shorter period (10-25 days), younger stellar population group. Both observations suggest that the age of the system could be between 1 and a few Gyrs. The overall best-determined physical properties of the two stars, based on the spectroscopic observations and analyses, including M∗, R∗, L∗, Teff, log g, metallicity, and distance, are given in Table 3. 6. RADIAL VELOCITIES The five Keck HIRES spectra obtained can also be used to place constraints on the mass of the putative planet. The standard CPS pipeline is used to convert from raw spectra to two-dimensional spectra. Each of the three HIRES CCDs are independently reduced with flat fields, sky subtraction, and cosmic-ray removal. The pixel columns at each wavelength are then summed, resulting in flux as a function of wavelength for each pixel. Consistent wavelength solutions are insured by aligning a carefully chosen set of Thorium-Argon emission lines onto the same pixels at the beginning of each night’s observations. The systemic radial velocity of each star is measured using the A-band and B-band telluric line features. Using the tel- luric lines as the wavelength fiducial, the relative placement of the stellar absorption lines is measured, and referenced to stars of known radial velocity (Chubak et al. 2012). These radial velocity measurements are made relative the Earth’s barycenter and are accurate to ±0.3 km/s. No RV variabil- ity in phase with the orbit of the target is detected, and the radial velocities have an rms of 0.3 km/s, compatible with the expected uncertainties. We used these five Keck HIRES points to set a formal 1-σ upper limit on the RV amplitude of the host star of 280 m/sec, yielding a 2 - σ upper limit on the planet mass of 1.4 MJ. This is not highly constraining in the context of a small rocky planet, but it does rule out non-planetary scenarios (assuming that the source of the photometric dips is the brighter star). 7. GTC MULTICOLOR OBSERVATIONS 7.1. Wavelength Dependent Transits Spectro-photometric observations for 3 complete transits were obtained with OSIRIS on the GTC (see also Sect. 4). The GTC instrument OSIRIS consists of two CCD detectors with a field of view (FOV) of 7.8′ × 7.8′ and a plate scale of 0.127′′ per pixel. For our observations, we used the 2 × 2 binning mode, a readout speed of 200 kHz with a gain of 0.95 e-/ADU and a readout noise of 4.5 e-. We used OSIRIS in its long-slit spectroscopic mode, selecting the grism R1000R which covers the spectral range of 520-1040 nm with a res- olution of R = 1122 at 751 nm. The observations and results we present here were taken using a custom built slit of 12′′ in width, with the target and a comparison star both located in the slit. The use of a wider slit has the advantage of re- ducing the possible systematic effects that can be introduced by light losses due to changes in seeing and/or imperfect tele- scope tracking (Murgas et al. 2014). FIG. 10.— HIRES co-added spectrum of K2-22 (black line) encompassing the Hα line. The best fitting template spectrun is overplotted with a thick red line. analysis of the HIRES spectra. 5.2.4. UH88 SNIFS spectra Finally, spectra of both K2-22 and its companion star were obtained with the SNIFS integral field spectrograph on the UH88 telescope on Mauna Kea during the night of UT 31 March 2015. The two stars were spatially resolved in the im- age cubes. SNIFS spectra cover 3200-9700 Å with R ≈ 1000, do not suffer from slit effects, and have been precisely cali- brated by extensive observations of spectrophotometric stan- dards (Lantz et al. 2004; Mann et al. 2011; Mann et al. 2013). The wavelength coverage and resolution of SNIFS is more than adequate for measuring the strength of key molecular bands and atomic lines as indicators of Teff and gravity for M dwarf stars. SNR > 100 was obtained for the primary. The effective temperature of the target star was derived in- dependently from the SNIFS spectrum by comparing it to Dartmouth Stellar Evolution model predictions in a man- ner that has been calibrated to retrieve the bolometrically- determined temperatures of nearby stars with measured an- gular radii (Boyajian et al. 2012; Mann et al. 2013). Radius and mass were then derived from empirical relations based on an expanded set of calibrator stars (Mann et al. 2015), with masses obtained from the Delfosse et al. (2000) sam- ple. These yield Teff = 3780 ± 60 K, R∗ = 0.55 ± 0.03 R⊙, M∗ = 0.57 ± 0.06 M⊙, and log g = 4.72 ± 0.05, in quite good agreement with the other determinations of these parameters discussed above. Adopting the mean [Fe/H] and Teff derived from SpeX and HIRES we derived R∗, M∗, and L∗ for the primary star, and we did the same with the SpeX parameters for the secondary star. To this end we utilized empirical Teff-[Fe/H]-R∗, Teff-[Fe/H]- M∗, and Teff-[Fe/H]-L∗ relations derived from the Mann et al. (2015) sample. Accounting for errors in Teff, [Fe/H] and the Mann et al. (2015) relations we computed physical pa- rameters that are listed in Table 3. We also derived independent estimates of the distance to the stars, based on the colors and also on the spectroscopic param- eters, reaching similar values with different methods and for both stars. We conclude that both stars are likely bound and at a distance of 225 ± 50 pc. Constraints on the age of the system can be derived from the stellar rotation period using gyrochronology (see, e.g., Barnes 2007). It has been suggested that the classical rela- tionships may not work for M dwarfs because of the large K2-22b 13 During the first transit observed with the GTC (29 Jan) we took as a reference a very close comparison star to the east of the target. However, for the two last transits (13 and 14 Feb) we took a reference star with a similar brightness to K2-22 and located at a distance of 2.7′ from the target. The posi- tion angle of the reference star with respect to the target was - 79.2◦. The two stars were positioned equidistantly from the optical axis, close to the center of CCD#1, while CCD#2 was turned off to avoid crosstalk. The basic data reduction of the GTC transits was per- formed using standard procedures. The bias and flat field images were produced using the Image Reduction and Anal- ysis Facility (IRAF28) and were used to correct the images before the extraction of the spectra. The extraction and wave- length calibration was made using a PyRAF29 script written for GTC@OSIRIS long-slit data. This script automated some of the steps to produce the spectra such as: extraction of each spectrum, extraction of the corresponding calibration arc, and wavelength calibration (using the HgAr, Xe, Ne lamps pro- vided for the observations). All spectra were aligned to the first spectrum of the series to correct for possible shifts in the pixel/wavelength solution during the observations caused by flexures of the instrument. Several apertures were tested dur- ing the reduction process, and the one that delivered the best results in terms of low scatter (measured in rms) in the points outside of transit for the white light curve was selected. The results presented here were obtained using apertures of 28, 40, and 44 pixels in width for the three transit observations, respectively. Final spectra were not corrected for instrumen- tal response nor were they flux calibrated. Fig. 11 shows the extracted spectrum of K2-22. FIG. 11.— Visual explanation of our different choices for splitting the GTC observations into several different broad color bands. These are centered at 652.5 nm and 820 nm for the ‘red’ and ‘blue’ colors, and 625 nm, 735 nm, and 850 nm respectively, for the 3-color bands. The universal time of data acquisition was obtained using the recorded headers of the spectra indicating the opening and closing time of the shutter in order to compute the time of mid exposure. We then used the code written by Eastman et 28 IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astron- omy (AURA) under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foun- dation. 29 Python environment for IRAF MULTICOLOR OBSERVATIONS SUMMARY TABLE 5 Date δ570- 680nm δ680- 790nm δ790- 900nm α Jan 29 0.50 ± 0.06% 0.47 ± 0.05% 0.46 ± 0.05% 0.13 ± 0.55 Feb 14 0.48 ± 0.04% 0.49 ± 0.03% 0.44 ± 0.03% 0.11 ± 0.37 Feb 15 0.95 ± 0.04% 0.83 ± 0.03% 0.72 ± 0.04% 0.83 ± 0.23 These transit depths are measured from the data alone, and do not take into account contamination from the faint companion or airmass corrections. The calculated Angström exponent, α, is, however, corrected for the small dilution factor of the faint companion star. al. (2010)30 to compute the BJD time using the mid-exposure time for each of the spectra to produce the light curves ana- lyzed here. We constructed light curves over several spectral ranges to search for color dependencies of the transit shape and depth. In the case of the white light curve, the flux was integrated over almost the entire wavelength range of the observed spec- tra, between 570 and 900 nm, but avoiding the blue and red ends of the spectra where the SNR is lower. This step is particularly important, because observations at redder wave- lengths suffer from fringing31 whereas using the data at bluer wavelengths not only did not improve the quality of the light curves, but increased the occurrence of outliers. Three nar- rower color light curves were created from the raw spectra for each star, by integrating all counts over the spectral ranges 570-680 nm, 680-790 nm, and 790-900 nm (see Fig. 11). The final light curves used in the analyses were created by dividing the K2-22 light curves by the comparison star light curves. The scatter (std) for the relative white light curves can be found in Table 1. The white light transit profiles of the three separate GTC transits were shown earlier in Fig. 7. It is obvious that the depth of the transits change from one night to the next, con- firming the rapidly varying nature of this object. Note that between transits 2 and 3, only 27.44 hours had passed and the transit depth nearly doubled. To further investigate the nature of these changes in the GTC transit curves, in Fig. 12 we plot the three color light curves for each transit separately. Transit 3 (bottom panel) is the deepest and shows a clearly increasing transit depth to- wards the blue. The SNR is lower in the other two sets of color light curves and the transits are shallower, and thus there is no clear trend in transit depth with wavelength. In order to interpret quantitatively the color dependence of the depths in the third GTC transit, we fit our standard three-segment transit profile model to the data from each of the nights, with three different transit depths to evaluate how the transit depth changes with color. We also fit each transit with five addi- tional parameters, to construct a polynomial that reaches sec- ond order in time from mid-transit and it linearly depends on the mean-subtracted airmass and full-width half maximum of the images of the host star. The total number of parameters is 21 for each observation, with a total 120, 132 and 114 data points in each of the three nights. After finding the best-fit model, we set the error of the flux measurements of each light curve to provide a best-fit standard χ2 value equal to the num- ber of degrees of freedom. We then took correlated noise into account computing the β factors for each light curve and each night (see section 4), and multiplying the errors by their cor- 30 http://astroutils.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/time/ 31 http://www.gtc.iac.es/instruments/osiris/osiris.php#Fringing 14 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 FIG. 12.— GTC observations split among three color bands. On the left panels we show the raw light curves, which have been median-normalized. The observations shown on the right hand side have been corrected for time, airmass and seeing effects. The first two transits were shallower, and depth variations are hard to notice, but during the third night, when the white light transit is deepest, color variations are clearly observed. responding β factor. We use an MCMC routine to obtain pos- terior distributions for the transit depths, which are marginal- ized respect to all the other 18 model parameters (see Table 5). From the marginalized posterior distributions we compute a quantity called the “Angström exponent”, α, which is de- fined as - d ln σ/d ln λ , where σ is the effective extinction cross section. Here we take the transit depth (on each night) at wavelength, λ, to be proportional to the effective cross sec- tion at λ (under the assumption that the dust tail is optically thin). In order to use the transit depths, we first multiply each individual transit depth by (1 + Di) to apply a dilution correc- tion, where each Di is the flux ratio between the faint com- panion and the host star evaluated at the flux weighted center of each selected band. These Di values are obtained from our SED models (see Sect. 5.1), and have values of 4.4%, 6.6% and 8.9% with increasing wavelength, with uncertainties of 0.2%. We then find α = 0.83 ± 0.23, for the transit observed on February 15. For the other two transits, the values of α are 0.11 ± 0.37 and 0.13 ± 0.55, both slightly positive, but not statistically significantly different from zero. We made no corrections for the wavelength-dependent limb darkening properties, but utilized the quadratic limb darkening coeffi- cients of Claret & Bloemen (2011) to estimate that the val- ues of α would be lowered by between 0.15 and 0.02, for an equatorial transit (which is unlikely) and an impact parameter of b = 0.7, respectively. For higher impact parameters, up to 0.85 (see Table 4), the value of α could actually be raised by up to 0.15, and become even more significantly different from zero. 7.2. Interpretation in Terms of Dust We interpret the value of the Angström exponents in terms of Mie scattering (for spherical dielectric dust particles) with a variety of different compositions. We computed the Angström exponent, α, over the range 630-840 nm for a set of power-law distributions for the dust particle sizes, with dN/da ∝ a- Γ. In order to guarantee that the total cross section converges, we also need to specify a maximum grain size, amax. For the sake of specificity we adopted an illustrative dust composition of corundum, but the conclusions we draw are the same for a number of other common refractory materials, and in fact, for any material with real and imaginary indices of refrac- tion of n ≃ 1.6 and 0.001 . k . 0.03. We plot the computed Angström exponent in Fig. 13 as a function of amax for five different power-law exponents, Γ. As can be seen from the figure, values of α in the range of ∼0 - 1, as indicated in Ta- ble 5, correspond to non-steep power-law indices of Γ ≃ 1 - 3 and maximum particle sizes of ∼0.4 - 0.7 µm. In turn, these correspond to “effective particle sizes” of 0.2 µm to 0.4 µm, where the effective radius is the average grain radius weighted by both the size distribution and the cross section, i.e., aeff =Z amax 0 a1- Γ σ(a, λ) da /Z amax 0 a- Γ σ(a, λ) da (1) where σ(a, λ) is the wavelength dependent Mie extinction cross section for a particle of radius a. FIG. 13.— The Angström exponent computed from Mie scattering over the wavelength range 0.63 - 0.84 µm as a function of the maximum particle size, for five different indices, Γ, of the power-law grain size distribution, i.e., dN/da ∝ a- Γ. We adopted an illustrative particle material of corundum. 8. WHY THE BRIGHTER STAR IS THE SOURCE OF THE TRANSITS Here we summarize why we are confident that it is the brighter star that is the source of the observed transits. First, the fainter star is redder than the bright star (see Sect. 5.1); in K2-22b 15 particular the contribution from the faint star to the total flux increases by a factor of 2 from r to i band and a factor of 4 from r to z band. If we assume that the faint star is the host, and assume an achromatic mean transit depth, the changes in flux ratio should translate into correspondingly larger transit depths toward the red due to the dilution effect. In section 7 we showed simultaneous GTC transit observations in bands similar to r and a combination of the i and z bands. The tran- sit depth, at least on one occasion, is actually considerably shallower in the latter redder band, strongly suggesting that the bright star is the one being transited. From another line of argument, we note that the transit depths are sometimes as large as 1.3%, and if the fainter star (5% of the flux in g-band) were the source of the transits, it would have to be attenuated by 24% of its flux. Since the transits are highly variable in depth, and the transit profile is not that due to a conventional hard-body transit, it is almost certainly due to a ‘soft’ attenuator such as a dust tail. But, the fainter star has a radius of 0.3 R⊙, and therefore an occulting dust tail would have to either cover the entire star with an op- tical depth, τ, of ∼0.25, or cover ∼25% of the star (i.e., a tail thickness of ∼0.08 R⊙) with τ ≃ 1. Simulations of the dust tail in KIC 1255b (Rappaport et al. 2012) and this object (see Sect. 9.2) indicate that the vertical thickness of the dust tail is only ∼0.03 R⊙. This would make the scenario of a dust tail covering over 1/4 of the area of the fainter star highly unlikely. 9. THE DISINTEGRATING PLANET HYPOTHESIS 9.1. Evidence for a Disintegrating Planet When taken together, all these observational results point clearly toward a planet in a 9-hour orbit that is disintegrat- ing via the emission of dusty effluents. The lines of evi- dence pointing in this direction include: (1) erratically and highly variable transit depths (see Sect. 3); (2) transit profile shapes from ground-based observations that are likely vari- able (though with lesser confidence that the depth changes; see Sects. 4 and 7); and (3) an average transit profile from the K2 data that exhibits clear evidence for a post-transit “bump” and also weaker evidence for a pre-transit “bump” (Sect. 3.2). The first of these is highly reminiscent of the dis- integrating planet KIC 1255b (Rappaport et al. 2012), while the variable transit shapes are also detected in KIC 1255b from ground-based studies (R. Alonso et al. private communi- cation; Bochinski et al. 2015). The transit profile of K2-22b, with a post-transit “bump”, is different from the transit pro- files of KIC 1255b and KOI 2700b which show a post-transit depression as opposed to a post-transit bump. The first two of the above listed features point to obscuration by dusty ef- fluents coming from a planet, while the third property needs to be explained in this same context. In the following sec- tions we explore the significance and the interpretation of the transit profile. 9.2. Quantitative Model for the Leading Dust Tail A dust tail emanating from a planet, as inferred in the cases of KIC 1255b and KOI 2700b, trails the planet as is illustrated in Fig. 6 of Rappaport et al. (2012; see also the middle panel of our Fig. 15). Such dust tails are the way they would be seen in the reference frame of the planet, and note that the motion of the planet is implicitly in the opposite direction from the tail. In this case we would say that the tail “trails the planet”. The reason for this is that the radiation pressure acting on the dust forces it into an eccentric orbit with its periastron located at the point where the particle was released. This orbit has a larger semimajor axis than that of the planet (see Appendix B of Rappaport et al. 2014). In turn, the larger orbit has a lower orbital frequency, and the particles appear to trail behind the planet in a comet-like tail. An observer viewing this system is effectively moving counterclockwise. Thus, the ingress to the transit is sharp as the “comet head” moves onto the stellar disk (see Fig. 6 in Rappaport et al. 2012). The trailing tail would lead to a de- pression upon egress as the tail slowly moves off of the stellar disk. In that case, the pre-transit “bump” is caused by forward scattering by the densest regions of the dust which have not yet reached the stellar disk. This is the case we believe we see in KIC 1255b (Rappaport et al. 2012; Brogi et al. 2012; Bu- daj 2013; van Werkhoven et al. 2014). If the tail of the planet is sufficiently short (i.e., compared to the radius of the host star) then there would be both a pre-transit and a post-transit “bump”, the latter of which would dominate over the rela- tively shallow post-transit depression (see also Budaj 2013). In this case, the pre-transit bump would be somewhat larger due to the asymmetry in the direction of the tail. A logical first guess as to how to produce a post-transit “bump” on the transit curve would be to reverse the direction of the comet-like tail. However, as we have seen, substan- tial radiation pressure forces inevitably lead to a trailing tail. Then, the question becomes how to produce a “leading dust tail” to the planet. One way to have dusty material lead the planet, i.e., moving faster, would be to have it overflow its Roche lobe (or, Hill sphere of influence) and fall in toward the host star. At first consideration this doesn’t seem to work since a rocky planet in a 9-hour orbit will not be close to filling its Roche lobe. Rappaport et al. (2013) showed that the criti- cal density for Roche-lobe overflow is largely a function of its orbital period, and is nearly independent of the properties of the host star. In particular, Eqn. (5) in Rappaport et al. (2013) suggests that critical density for a planet to be filling its Roche lobe is Porb (cid:19)2 ρcrit ≃(cid:18) 11.3 hr g/cm3 ≃ 1.5 g/cm3 (2) where the right-hand value is for a 9-hour planet. It seems very unlikely that a planet with this low a mean density would be disintegrating via dusty effluents. Turning the problem around, we can ask what fraction of the Roche-lobe radius would be occupied by a planet with a mean density in the range of 5-8 g/cc, which might be more appropriate for a dust emitter (see, e.g., Rappaport et al. 2013). It is then evident that for densities which are ∼3 - 5 times higher than their critical densities, their radii are not even factors of ∼2 times smaller than their Roche lobes. Therefore, we come to the conclusion that planets with rocky compositions in a 9-hour orbit are underfilling their Roche lobes by only a factor of ∼2. This is more than suffi- cient to prevent the planet from directly overflowing its Roche lobe. However, the potential difference between the planet’s surface and the Roche lobe is about half the potential differ- ence to infinity. Thus, if the mechanism that drives off the dust or the heavy metal vapors that condense into dust, e.g., via a Parker-type wind (Rappaport et al. 2012; Perez-Becker & Chiang 2013) imparts the full escape velocity of the planet or more, then the material can certainly reach the surface of its Roche lobe. If the material reaching the Roche surface feels a substantial 16 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 FIG. 14.— Calculated values of β, the ratio of radiation pressure to grav- itational forces, as a function of particle size. The blue and green curves (nearly superposed) are for KIC 1255b and KOI 2700b, respectively. The red curves are values of β for EPIC 201673175, for different materials. For KIC 1255b and KOI 2700b we adopted n = 1.65 and k = 0.01 for the real and imaginary parts of the index of refraction. The solid red curve is for the same indices. The dot-dashed curve is for the same real index but with k = 0.02, while the dotted, dashed, and dot-dot-dashed curves are specifically for iron, corundum and forsterite, respectively. The horizontal black dotted line indi- cates the value of β = 0.02 below which most dust particles would go into a leading tail. radiation pressure, it will still be blown back into a comet-like tail. By “substantial” we mean that β, the ratio of radiation pressure forces to gravitational forces, exceeds a certain value such as β & 0.05. For sufficiently small values of β, however, particles initially directed toward the host star (which seems reasonable since the gas or dust emission should commence on the heated hemisphere) will largely fall toward the host star until the grains are pushed into orbit by coriolis forces. These particles will form a “leading tail” in the sense that the motion will be in front of the planet. The values of β for the particles are computed according to β ≃ L∗σ 4πcGM∗µ ≡ 3 L∗ h σ(a, λ)i 16πcGM∗ρa (3) where L∗ and M∗ are the luminosity and mass of the host star, a is the particle radius, σ is the particle cross section at wave- length λ, h σi is the dimensionless cross section in units of πa2 averaged over the stellar spectrum (see, e.g., Kimura et al. 2002), and µ and ρ are the mass and material density of the dust grains. Since, for low-mass main-sequence stars the luminosity scales roughly as M4 ∗, we find that for a fixed ma- terial in the grains, β scales as M3 ∗ h σ(a, λ)i (4) β ∝ a We evaluate the dimensionless spectrum-averaged cross sec- tion with a Mie scattering code (Bohren & Huffman 1983) for different assumed material indices of refraction (see Croll et al. 2014). Plots of β(a) for several different assumed compo- sitions are shown in Fig. 14. They are also compared against representative β(a) curves for KIC 1255b and KOI 2700b. The latter two systems have β(a) curves that are essentially a factor of 2 higher than for K2-22b, largely due to the lower luminosity per unit mass of the latter host star. Expression (4) raises the interesting prospect that for low mass stars, the value of β will be sufficiently small that out- flowing particles passing through their Roche lobes will be immune to radiation forces and act much in the same way as FIG. 15.— Simulated dust tails. The dust particles are launched with some- what more than the escape speed from the planet within a 30◦ cone centered on the direction of the host star. The particle sizes are chosen via Monte Carlo means from a power-law distribution, and the value of β for each particle is calculated from the system parameters (see text). There are 50,000 particles in each simulation, and each one is assumed to have an exponentially decay- ing cross section (see App. C of Rappaport et al. 2014) with a time constant of 104 s. Only radiation and gravitational forces are included. The color coding is proportional to the logarithm of the dust particle density with white-red the largest to blue-purple the lowest. The dust tails are shown in the rest frame of the orbiting planet (implicitly moving downward in the frame). The top panel is a view of the orbit and dust tail from the orbital pole, and clearly shows both a leading and a trailing tail. The bottom panel is a view from the orbital plane as the dust emitting planet crosses the disk of the host star. The middle panel results from arbitrarily multiplying each calculated value of β by a factor of 4, the net effect of which is to eliminate the leading tail. K2-22b 17 Roche-lobe overflowing material. We next carried out a large number of simulations of dust particles ejected from a planet and initially moving in vari- ous directions with different speeds. For most of our simu- lations, we took the direction of the particles to be uniformly distributed within a cone of 30◦ radius and centered in the direction of the host star. The velocities were somewhat arbi- trarily taken to be one half the escape speed from the surface of the planet’s Roche lobe to infinity in the absence of the host star, i.e.,pGMp/2RL where Mp is the planet’s mass and RL is its Roche-lobe radius. This is the minimum that can be con- templated for a Parker-wind type outflow. For each dust grain, a radius, a, is chosen from an assumed particle size distribu- tion via Monte Carlo methods. We considered a power-law differential size distribution for the dust grains with a slope of - 2, as illustrative, with the maximum and minimum sizes in this distribution taken to be 1 µm and 1/20 µm, respectively. The luminosity of the host star is taken to be that of a main- sequence M-K star of 0.6 M⊙ (see Table 3). For purposes of the numerical calculations of the particle dynamics only, we used a simple analytic fit to the plots shown in Fig. 14 of the form: β ∝ (5) h σ(a, λ)i a c1 + c2a3 1 + c3a4 ∝ where the c’s are constants to be fit, and which depend on L∗, M∗, and the dust composition. The results of our particle dynamics simulations are shown in Fig. 15. The top panel represents the trajectories of all par- ticles regardless of their size or corresponding value of β. The dust density is assumed to decay exponentially in time, with a time constant of 104 sec. Note that there is a forward moving “leading tail” in addition to a bifurcated trailing tail. The inner of the two trailing tails arises from particles with small values of β that are launched with a substantial velocity component in the forward direction. In the bottom panel of Fig. 15 we see the two tails from the perspective of an observer viewing an equatorial transit; there are far more particles in the lead- ing tail. For comparison, we show in the middle panel a case where the computed value of β was arbitrarily multiplied by a factor of 4; all other parameters remained the same. Note that the result is a purely trailing dust tail as one would have in a solar system comet. This latter exercise ensures that all the particles have a β that exceeds a critical value of ∼0.02, guar- anteeing that the particles will go into a trailing tail. The bot- tom line is that dust-emitting planets around luminous stars should have predominantly trailing tails while the reverse is true for low-luminosity stars. In all of these calculations, we have ignored possible ram pressure forces on the dust grains due to a stellar wind from the host star. For a justification of why this may be a good approximation, see Appendix A of Rappaport et al. (2014). 9.3. Model Transits 9.3.1. Idealized Transit Models The transit profiles expected for a planet with a trailing comet-like tail are already sufficiently complicated compared to a conventional hard-body planet transit. They include such issues as the attenuation caused by the (unknown) absorp- tion profile, typically characterized by an exponential scale length32; possible forward scattering which is influenced by 32 For a discussion of why the dust tail may fall off approximately expo- nentially, including the effects of dust sublimation on a timescale of hours, FIG. 16.— Schematic transit profiles for a range of dust tail parameters. θ is the orbital phase of the planet, and θ∗ is the half angle subtended by the host star as seen from the planet. Top panel: Trailing dust tail only. The exponential tail length, ℓ, is color coded and is expressed in units of the radius of the host star. No forward scattering is included. Note how the shorter the tail length, the smaller is the post-transit depression. Middle panel: Same as for the top panel, but in this case a contribution from forward scattering has been included. There is now a noticeable pre-transit bump due to the forward scattering, but only for the case of short dust tails is there a barely perceptible post-transit bump; it is typically suppressed by the post-transit depression. Bottom panel: Here, there is both a trailing and a leading dust tail. The exponential scale lengths, ℓ, of both dust tails are assumed to be the same, but the leading tail is taken to have twice the dust density, ρ, at every corresponding angular distance, as the trailing tail. For long tail lengths there are no pre- or post-transit bumps due to forward scattering, as they are pulled below the discernible level by the corresponding depressions caused by direct attenuation from the tails. By contrast, for the case of short tail lengths, i.e., . 0.2 Rstar, there is both a pre- and a post-transit bump, with the latter being slightly larger. 18 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 star as seen from the planet. In that case, the effective angular scattering pattern from a single grain is somewhat larger than that of the angular size of the host star (i.e., ∼17◦). In the bot- tom panel of Fig. 16 the transit profiles are for the case where there is both a trailing and a leading dust tail. The exponen- tial lengths of both dust tails have been taken to be the same (i.e., ℓ1 = ℓ2), but the leading tail is taken to have twice the op- tical thickness everywhere as the trailing tail. For large ℓ there are no pre- or post-transit bumps, as they are pulled below the discernible level by the corresponding depressions caused by the tails. By contrast, for the case of short tail lengths, i.e., ℓ . 0.2 R∗, there is both a pre- and a post-transit bump, with the latter being slightly larger. 9.3.2. Model Fit to the K2-22b Transit FIG. 17.— Best fitting model transit profile. The black histogram represents the observed transit (see Fig. 6). The red curve is the best fitting model. The green and blue curves represent the direct absorption and forward scattering components, respectively. Note how the forward scattering causes the peaks on either side of the transit (see also Budaj 2013). the grain size and composition (which may be changing along the tail as different materials sublimate at different rates); con- volution of the scattering phase function with the finite angu- lar profile of the host star; and another convolution with the density profile of the tail. When adding the possibility of both a trailing and leading tail, as we have postulated in this work, the situation quickly becomes even more complicated. In an attempt to keep the numbers of free parameters to a minimum, we have adopted the following seven-parameter model: an ex- ponential attenuation profile of the tail in both directions, each with its own scale length, ℓ; a relative density between the two tails, ρ1/ρ2; the size of the dust grains, a; and an overall nor- malization factor that yields the correct mean transit depth. In addition to these parameters associated with the dust tails, there is also an impact parameter for the transiting planet, and the time of orbital phase zero. We assume that the hard body of the planet itself does not make a significant contribution to the transit profile. We illustrate in Fig. 16 what some of the possible transit profiles might look like with just two of these parameters varying. First, we consider only a trailing dust tail, and we vary the exponential scale length (ℓ, in units of the host star’s radius). These transit profiles are shown in the top panel of Fig. 16. The tails’ exponential scale length, ℓ, is color coded to help in distinguishing the different curves. No forward scattering is included in this case. Note how the shorter ℓ is, the smaller is the post-transit depression. The latter becomes quite noticeable when ℓ for the tail becomes greater than about 30% of the radius of the star. In the middle panel of Fig. 16 the contribution from forward scattering by relatively large particles (∼0.5 µm) has been included. In all cases there is a noticeable pre-transit bump due to the forward scattering, but only for the case of short dust tails (i.e., small ℓ) is there a perceptible post-transit bump; it is typically suppressed by the post-transit depression as the dust tail is in the process of moving off the stellar disk. The grain sizes assumed here are sufficiently large so that λ/2πa, the characteristic Mie scat- tering angle, is comparable with the angular size of the host see Appendix C of Rappaport et al. (2014). Finally, we have attempted to fit a simple two-tail dust model to the observed transit profile of K2-22b. Once the model and its free parameters were selected, we computed the scattering pattern for the dust particles (taken to be of a sin- gle fixed size throughout both tails) via a Mie scattering code (Bohren & Huffman 1983). Then the scattering pattern was convolved numerically via a 2D integral with the radiation profile coming from the host star (including limb-darkening). In turn, this net effective scattering profile was convolved in 1D with the assumed exponential tails to produce the scatter- ing pattern as a function of orbital phase. The attenuation of the beam from the host star was simply computed by placing a double-sided exponential profile in front of a limb-darkened stellar disk in different longitudinal locations (i.e., as a func- tion of orbital phase) and at different vertical locations to get a best estimate of the impact parameter b (in units of the stel- lar radius). The sum of the absorption and forward scattering contributions was then added and convolved with the Kepler long cadence integration time. We first explored a wide range of parameter space, espe- cially focusing on the physically interesting parameters: b, the impact parameter, ℓ1, ℓ2, ρ1/ρ2, the exponential scale lengths and ratios of optical thickness of the two tails, respec- tively, and a, the grain size. We also considered models with a power-law distribution of grain sizes, but these produced no better fits than using a single grain size. To simplify the search, we fixed ℓ1 = ℓ2 under the assumption that the dust sublimation time and the speed away from the planet is sim- ilar in the two tails. However, we allowed ρ1/ρ2 to be a free parameter since the amount of dust in the two tails could be quite different. From this broad search, we were able to draw several interesting conclusions. (1) The best fits, by only a small margin, are found for the single (leading) tail models, i.e., no trailing tail is needed. (2) For single-leading tail mod- els, the impact parameter is constrained to be 0.42 < b < 0.78 and 0.19 < ℓ2 < 0.48 R∗ (both 90% confidence limits). (3) For two-sided tail models the allowed ratio of optical thicknesses is constrained to be ρ1/ρ2 < 0.5 (assuming ℓ1 = ℓ2). (4) The best-fitting single grain-size models have 0.3 < a < 0.5 µm. The final parameter search and error estimation were done with an MCMC routine. These results are summarized in Ta- ble 4. The overall best-fitting model is for b = 0.65 and ℓ2 = 0.32 R∗. The results are shown in Fig. 17. The black his- togram is the same average transit profile as is shown in Fig. 6. The red curve is the overall fit to the transit profile, includ- ing the convolution with the LC integration time. The overall model transit profile is comprised of two components: the di- rect attenuation of the flux from the host star (green curve) K2-22b 19 and the forward scattering from the dust tail back into the beam directed toward the observer (blue curve). Note how the forward scattering produces small bumps both before and after the transits, with the larger bump following the egress. 9.4. Inferred Dust Sublimation Timescale The dust sublimation timescale depends on the equilibrium temperature (Teq), the mineral composition, and the size of the dust grains (see, e.g., Kimura et al. 2002; Appendix C of Rappaport et al. 2014). Teq for the dust grains in K2-22b is necessarily somewhat uncertain, ranging between ∼1500 K and 2100 K, depending on exactly how it is computed (to within unknown factors of order unity). However, if we take Teq = 1700 K as a typical grain equilibrium temperature, then the lifetime of a 1 micron grain composed of Fe, SiO, or fayalite is a matter of a few tens of seconds. On the other hand, minerals such as enstatite, forsterite, quartz, and corun- dum, would have sublimation lifetimes of 1/2, 3, 15, and 30 hours, respectively. SiC and graphite could last for a very much longer time than any of these. (All the dust parame- ters for the above estimates, including the heat of sublima- tion, are taken from the conveniently tabulated values of van Lieshout et al. 2014). Thus, there is no one “expected” dust sublimation timescale that we can anticipate. If on the other hand, we believe that the dust tail is only a few degrees of the orbit in length (see Table 4), and that β ≈ 0.05, then the “inferred” lifetime is ∼ 1 hour (see Eqn. (4) and (6) of Rap- paport et al. 2014 for an explanation), and therefore the dust composition might resemble enstatite or forserite. However, one should not draw too many conclusions from this since the actual tail length depends on a combination of numerous (uncertain) parameters such as the particle sizes (and indeed the size distribution), the parameter β, the actual equilibrium temperature, and so forth. Nonetheless, we can say that min- erals such as enstatite or forsterite do seem consistent with the observations. 9.5. Dust-on-Dust Collisions We note that there is an interesting possibility for the dust streaming from the planet to interact with dust that has already been orbiting for a substantial while – provided that the subli- mation lifetime will allow the dust to survive for a sufficiently long time. The time required for orbiting dust in a trailing dust tail (i.e., ‘outer-track orbits’ with 0.05 & β & 0.02) to meet up again with the planet is approximately Porb/(2β) (see Eqn. (4) of Rappaport et al. 2014); for K2-22b this amounts to 10 - 25 Porb (or ∼4 - 10 days). For particles with β . 0.02 the orbits likely lie inside the planet’s orbit (‘inner-track orbits’) with radii between ∼94% and 98% of d. This leads to synodic orbital periods for those dust particles of between ∼10 and 30 Porb, fairly similar to the outer-track orbits. Thus, any orbit- ing dust that might collide with newly emitted dust must last for 4 - 10 days. The dust grains on the inner-track orbits have speeds in the rest frame of the planet that range from 0 - 6 km s- 1 (prograde), while the corresponding range of outer-track orbits is 0 - 25 km s- 1 (retrograde). Thus, the inner track par- ticles would catch up to, and collide with, newly emitted dust grains with only a few km s- 1 relative velocity. By contrast, the outer track particles could collide with newly emitted dust at relatively high speeds of more than 10 km s- 1. At such speeds, a collision would deposit a mean energy of ∼1 eV per atomic mass unit within the dust grain. This seems likely to completely destroy most dust particles that happen to collide on the outer track. Additionally, any orbiting dust grains which are moving quickly may catch up, and collide, with other more slowly orbiting dust. Again, the relative speeds of any colliding dust particles on the inner track would likely be of order a km s- 1 and would not necessarily destroy the dust, whereas the re- verse is true for the outer-track dust grains. We can make a crude estimate of the collision frequency of a dust grain that is orbiting the host star. Take the mean grain number density along the observer’s line of sight during a typical transit to be n0, and the collision cross section to be σ. In that case, the collision mean free path is ℓ = 1/(n0σ). If we take the radial thickness of the dust tail that is causing the transits to be ∆r, then ∆r ≃ 1/(n0σ) if both the optical cross section for extinction and the collision cross section are approximately equal (i.e., the geometric cross section appro- priate for larger particles), and if the optical depth of the dust cloud during transits is of order unity. (The latter is necessary since the dust tail is thin in the vertical direction and covers only a small fraction of the disk of the host star (see middle panel of Fig. 15). Using the above expression, we can esti- mate the mean collision time, τcoll, for particles orbiting in the dust disk τcoll ≈ 1 2π ∆r d vorb vrel n0 hni Porb (6) where vorb and vrel are the mean orbital speed in inertial space and the mean relative speeds of the particles in a dust disk, and hni is the mean density in dust grains around the azimuth of the dust disk. These factors are extremely uncertain, but as an illustrative example, if we take ∆r/d ≈ 0.05, vorb/vrel ≈ 10, and n0/hni ≈ 100, then τcoll is of order several times Porb. What is the fate of dust particles that collide but are not destroyed in the collision? There could be locations in the dust disk where the dust is slowed down by the collisions and the density builds up. In principle, these regions of enhanced density could be approximately fixed in the rotating frame of the planet and host star. However, since we see only a single transit-like feature during an orbital period, we conclude that such pile-up of dust is not significant anywhere, with the pos- sible exception of near the planet where the dust density is the highest. A careful examination of what the effects are of dust-dust collisions in this system or, for that matter, KIC 1255b and KOI 2700b are much beyond the scope of this paper, and we leave that study to another work. 10. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS We have reported the discovery in the K2 Field-1 data of a new planet that is likely the third example of a planet dis- integrating via the emission of dusty effluents. The planet is in an ultrashort 9.1457 hour orbit about an M star. The ev- idence we presented for the presence of a dust tail includes erratically and highly variable transit depths ranging from . 0.14% to 1.3% in both the K2 data as well as in follow-up ground-based observations from five different observatories. The folded orbital light curve from the K2 data exhibits a clear post-egress ‘bump’ and a much less significant, but plausible, pre-ingress ‘bump’, that are not found in conventional hard- body transits. There is no post-egress depression in the flux as was seen in KIC 1255b or in KOI 2700b. On at least one observation with the GTC, the transit depths were distinctly wavelength dependent with the transits ∼25% shallower at 840 nm than at 630 nm. While this goes in the same direc- 20 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 tion as limb-darkening effects (see, e.g., Knutson et al. 2007; Claret & Bloemen 2011), we argue that the magnitude of the limb-darkening effect explains only a small fraction of what is observed. Furthermore, the variable behavior of the color- dependent transit depths strongly suggests an origin in dust scattering. This requires relatively non-steep power-law par- ticle size distributions with Γ ≃ 1 to 3 with maximum sizes in the range of 0.4 - 0.7 µm. The host star is an M star with Teff ≃ 3800 K. There is a companion star 1.9′′ away with Teff ≃ 3300 K. We infer a dis- tance to the system of 225 ± 50 pc, which, in turn, implies a projected physical separation of the two stars of ∼430 AU. At this distance, the companion star may have been incidental to the formation of the planet, but perhaps was instrumental in driving it toward the host star via Kozai-Lidov cycles with tidal friction (Kozai 1962, Lidov 1962; Kiseleva et al. 1998; Fabrycky & Tremaine 2007). The minimum transit depth of . 0.14% sets an upper limit to the size of the underlying hard-body planet of 2.5 R⊕ for an assumed radius of the host star of 0.57 ± 0.06 R⊙. This is consistent with the low surface gravity that is required to drive off metal vapors that could condense into dust (Rappa- port et al. 2012; Perez-Becker & Chiang 2013). In fact, it seems likely if the dust-emitting scenario we report for K2- 22b is correct then Mars, Mercury, or even lunar sized bodies with surface gravities of 1/6 to 1/3 that of Earth are to be pre- ferred. We find that the dust tail of K2-22b has two properties that are distinct from those of KIC 1255b33 or KOI 2700b: (1) a leading dust tail (as opposed to a trailing one); and (2) a characteristic (e.g., exponential) scale length for the dust tail that is . 1/2 R∗. The former requires dust transported to about twice the planet’s radius in the direction of the host star until it effectively overflows its Roche lobe, thereby going into an orbit that is faster than that of the planet. It is also necessary to have β (the ratio of radiation pressure forces to gravity) be . 0.02 which would be the case for very low luminosity host stars in combination with very small (. 0.1 µm) or very large (& 1 µm) dust particles (see Fig. 14). The shorter dust tails could result from a combination of very low values of β and a short dust-grain sublimation time of . an hour. Mass loss rates in the form of high-Z material from this planet are likely to be ≈ 1.5 × 1011 g s- 1 implying a lifetime of 20 - 70 Myr, for planet masses in the range of the moon’s to Mercury’s mass. The scenario described above for explaining the various features of the transit light curve and its variability is not en- tirely self-consistent. The requirement for particles to enter a leading tail is β . 0.02 µm which implies particle sizes of ei- ther a . 0.1 µm or a & 1 µm. At the same time, the post-transit bump requires a forward scattering peak that is comparable to the angular size of the host star. This corresponds to particle sizes of ∼ 1/2 µm. Finally, the color dependence of the tran- sits observed with the GTC implies a non-steep power-law size distribution with a maximum size of ∼1/2 µm. Thus, larger particles could account for all three of these observa- tional pieces of evidence—but only if a substantial fraction of the particles are large (e.g., ∼ 1 µm). This requirement for such large particles seems somewhat unusual in comparison 33 We note that Bochinski et al. (2015) were able to measure a small dif- ference in transit depths in KIC 1255b between g’ and z’ bands, and thereby concluded that the dusty effluents in this object contained a component of larger grains in the range of 0.25 - 1 µm. TABLE 6 COMPARISON OF DUSTY PLANETS Parameter (units) EPIC 2016371 KIC 1255b2 KOI 2700b3 21.84 0.031 - 0.053 13 yes no slowly 5.9 ± 0.4 9.146 0 - 1.3 highly 3.3 ± 0.2 15.68 0 - 1.4 highly 4.3 ± 0.4 Porb (hr) Depth (%) Variability d/R∗ θ∗ (deg) Pre-bump Post-bump θtail (deg)4 θtail/θ∗ Thost (K) Teq (K)5 βmax Mdust (1010 g/s) 1 Results from this work. 2 Values from Rappaport et al. (2012); Brogi et al. (2012); Budaj (2013); van Werkhoven et al. (2014). 3 Values from Rappaport et al. (2014). 4 Approximate exponential tail length in degrees of orbital phase. 5 Teq ≡ TeffpR∗/d. 17 weak yes . 8 . 0.5 3830 2100 0.05 20 10 ... no ∼24 ∼2.4 4435 1850 0.07 0.15 ∼10 - 15 ∼0.77 - 1.1 4300 2100 0.1 20 with other known astrophysical collections of dust such as in the ISM (e.g., Mathis et al. 1977; Bierman & Harwitt 1980), Solar-system comet tails (e.g., Kelley et al. 2013), Io (e.g., Krüger et al. 2003a; 2003b), and the Earth’s atmosphere (e.g., Liou 2002; Holben et al. 1998). The host star K2-22 shows photometric modulations with an amplitude of approximately 1% and a timescale of 15 days. It is interesting to note that the other two host stars to disin- tegrating planets also display photometric modulations at the several percent level, likely associated with star spots. It has been suggested that stellar activity may play an important role in modulating the process that generates the dust (Kawahara et al. 2013; Croll et al. 2015). The large spot modulations for the host stars of the candidate disintegrating planets is sugges- tive and warrants further investigation. Finally, we summarize in Table 6 some comparative prop- erties of the three known ‘disintegrating planets’. Hopefully, further patterns of similarity will emerge as more of these ob- jects are discovered. Discoveries of new disintegrating planets in the upcoming K2 fields could be potentially quite important. If found, these candidates are likely to orbit brighter stars than the host stars of the examples discovered to date. It would also be inter- esting to discover them orbiting a richer variety of host stars, especially since we have inferred from K2-22b that the low lu- minosity of the host star plays an important role in determin- ing the trajectories of the dust flowing from these very special planets. Future follow-up observations with ground-based telescopes, both in photometric and spectroscopic modes, are likely to provide us with further information about the pro- cess that generates the dust emission, and give us better in- sights into the relevant physical processes in these extreme- environment systems. We thank Joshua Pepper and Smadar Naoz for helpful com- ments and an anonymous referee for suggestions that greatly improved the presentation of the material. We thank Allyson Bieryla and Dave Latham for helping us with the FLWO ob- servations of the object. We are grateful to Evan Sinukoff, Erik Petigura, and Ian Crossfield for observing this target with Keck/HIRES. We thank Yi Yang for helping with the HSC images, and Takuya Suenaga for volunteering his time K2-22b 21 to do so. The help from the Subaru Telescope staff is greatly appreciated. We acknowledge Tsuguru Ryu for his support on the Okayama transit observations. T.H. is supported by Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) Fellowship for Research (No. 25-3183). I.R. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) through grant ESP2013-48391-C4-1-R. We extend special thanks to those of Hawaiian ancestry on whose sa- cred mountain of Mauna Kea we are privileged to be guests. Without their generous hospitality, the Keck observations pre- sented herein would not have been possible. This work was performed, in part, under contract with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) funded by NASA through the Sagan Fel- lowship Program executed by the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute. This article is partly based on observations made with the Nordic Optical Telescope operated by the Nordic Op- tical Telescope Scientific Association and the Gran Telesco- pio Canarias operated on the island of La Palma by the IAC at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos. This research has been supported by the Spanish MINECO grant number ESP2013-48391-C4-2-R. The Infrared Telescope Fa- cility is operated by the University of Hawaii under contract NNH14CK55B with the National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration. FM acknowledges the support of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), under the program ANR-12-BS05-0012 Exo-atmos. REFERENCES Aigrain, S., Hodgkin, S.T., Irwin, M.J., Lewis, J.R., & Roberts, S.J. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 2880 Armstrong, D. J., Kirk, J., Lam, K. W. F., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A19 Armstrong, D. J., Santerne, A., Veras, D., et al. 2015, arXiv:1503.00692 Barnes, S. A. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1167 Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 27 Bierman, P. & Harwit, M. 1980, ApJ, 241, L105 Bochanski, J. J., West, A. A., Hawley, S. L., & Covey, K. R. 2007, AJ, 133, Bochinski, J.J., Haswell, C.A., Marsh, T.R., Dhillon, V.S, & Littlefair, S.P. 531 2015, ApJ, 800, L21 Bohren, C. F., & Huffman, D. R. 1983, New York: Wiley, 1983. Borucki, W.J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010, Sci, 327, 977 Bouchy, F., Queloz, D., Deleuil, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 482, 25 Boyajian, T.S., von Braun, K., van Belle, G. et al. 2012, ApJ, 757, 112 Brogi, M., Keller, C. U., de Juan Ovelar, M., Kenworthy, M. A., de Kok, R. J., Min, M., & Snellen, I. A. G. 2012, A&A, 545, L5 Budaj, J. 2013, A&A, 557, A72 Chubak, C., Marcy, G., Fischer, D.A., Howard, A.W., Isaacson, H., Johnson, J.A., & Wright, J.T. 2012, arXiv: 1207.6212 Claret, A. & Bloemen, S. 2011, A&A, 529, A75 Croll, B., Rappaport, S., & DeVore, J. 2014, ApJ, 786, 100 Croll, B., Rappaport, S., & Levine, A. M. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1408 Crossfield, I. J. M., Petigura, E., Schlieder, J. E., et al. 2015, ApJ, 804, 10 Cushing, M.C., Vacca, W.D., & Rayner, J.T. 2004, PASP, 116, 362 Delfosse, X., Forveille, T., & Ségransan, D. et al. 2000, A&A 364, 217 Delorme, P., Collier Cameron, A., Hebb, L., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 2218 Eastman, J., Siverd, R., & Gaudi, B. S. 2010, PASP, 122, 935 Fabrycky, D., & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298 Foreman-Mackey, D., Montet, B. T., Hogg, D. W., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 215 Frandsen, S., & Lindberg, B. 1999, Astrophysics with the NOT, 71 Fukui, A., Narita, N., Tristram, P.J., et al. 2011, PASJ, 63, 287 Fukui, A., Kawashima, Y., Ikoma, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 108 Gandolfi, D., Alcalá, J. M., Leccia, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 687, 1303 Gillon, M., Jehin, E., Magain, P., et al. 2011, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, Vol. 11, European Physical JournalWeb of Conferences, 6002 AA82 381 Holben, B., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., et al. 1998, Rem. Sens. Environ., 66, 1 Holman, M. J., Winn, J. N., Latham, D. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1715 Howard, A.W., Johnson, J.A., Marcy, G.W. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1467 Howard, A. W., Sanchis-Ojeda, R., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2013, Nature, 503, Howell, S.B., Sobeck, C., Haas, M., et al. 2014, PASP, 126, 398 Husser, T.-O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., Homeier, D., Reiners, A., Barman, T., & Hauschildt, P.H. 2013, A&A, 553, 6 Jackson, B., Barnes, R., & Greenberg, R. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1357 Jehin, E., Gillon, M., Queloz, D., et al. 2011, The Messenger, 145, 2 Jenkins, J.M., Caldwell, D.A., Chandrasekaran, H., et al. 2010, ApJ Lett, Kawahara, H., Hirano, T., Kurosaki, K., Ito, Y., & Ikoma, M. 2013, ApJ, 713, L 87 776, LL6 529 Kovács, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 2002, A&A, 391, 369 Krüger, H., Horányi, M. & Gün, E., 2003a, GeoRL, 30.1058 Krüger, H., Geissler, P. & Horányi, M. et al. 2003b, GeoRL, 30.2101 Knutson, H.A., Charbonneau, D., Noyes, R.W., Brown, T.M., & Gilliland, R.L. 2007, ApJ, 655, 564. Kozai, Y., 1962, AJ, 67, 591 LaCourse, D. M., Jek, K. J., Jacobs, T. L., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3561 Lantz, B., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al., 2004, SPIE 5249, 146 Lázaro, C., Arévalo, M. J., & Almenara, J. M. 2015, ??jnlNew A, 34, 139 Lépine, S., Hilton, E. J., Mann, A. W., et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 102 Lissauer, J.J., Marcy, G.W., Bryson, S.T., et al. 2014, ApJ Lett, 784, L44 Lidov, M. L., 1962, PlanSS, 9, 719 Liou. K.N. 2002, An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation, Second Edition, Academic Press, San Diego, CA Lund, M. N., Handberg, R., Davies, G. R., Chaplin, W. J., & Jones, C. D. 2015, ApJ, 806, 30 Maldonado, J., Affer, L., Micela, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A132 Mandel, K., & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, L171 Mann, A.W., Gaidos, E., & Aldering, G. 2011, PASP 123, 1273 Mann, A.W., Gaidos, E., & Ansdell, M. 2013, ApJ, 779, 188 Mann, A. W., Feiden, G. A., Gaidos, E., Boyajian, T., & von Braun, K. 2015, ApJ, 804, 64 Mathis, J. S., W. Rumpl, & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425 McQuillan, A., Aigrain, S., & Mazeh, T. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 1203 Miyazaki, S., Komiyama, Y., Nakaya, H., et al. 2012, Proc. SPIE, 8446, 84460Z Montet, B. T., Morton, T. D., Foreman-Mackey, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 25 Mullally, F., Coughlin, J. L., Thompson, S. E., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 31 Murgas, F., Pallé, E., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, AA41 Ofir, A. 2014, A&A, 561, AA138 Pepe, F., Cameron, A. C., Latham, D. W., et al. 2013, Nature, 503, 377 Perez-Becker, D., & Chiang, E. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 2294 Pont, F., Zucker, S., & Queloz, D. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 231 Rappaport, S., Levine, A., Chiang, E., et al. 2012, ApJ, 752, 1 Rappaport, S., Sanchis-Ojeda, R., Rogers, L. A., Levine, A., & Winn, J. N. 2013, ApJ, 773, L15 Rappaport, S., Barclay, T., DeVore, J., Rowe, J., Sanchis-Ojeda, R., & Still, Rayner, J.T., Toomey, D.W., Onaka, P.M., Denault, A.J., Stahlberger, W.E., Vacca, W.D., Cushing, M.C., & Wang, S. 2003, PASP, 115, 362 Rayner, J. T., Cushing, M. C., & Vacca, W. D. 2009, ApJS, 185, 289 Reiners, A., & Mohanty, S. 2012, ApJ, 746, 43 Rowe, J.F., Bryson, S.T., Marcy, G.W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 45 Sanchis-Ojeda, R., Rappaport, S., Winn, J. N., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 54 Sanchis-Ojeda, R., Rappaport, S., Winn, J. N., et al. 2014, ApJ, 787, 47 Schechter, P.L., Mateo, M., & Saha, A. 1993, PASP, 105, 1342 Schlaufman, K. C., Lin, D. N. C., & Ida, S. 2010, ApJ, 724, L53 Stassun, K.G., Pepper, J.A., Paegert, M., De Lee, N., & Sanchis-Ojeda, R. Telting, J. H., Avila, G., Buchhave, L., et al. 2014, Astronomische 2014, arXiv: 1410.6379 Nachrichten, 335, 41 Vacca, W. D., Cushing, M. C., & Rayner, J. T. 2003, PASP, 115, 389 Valdes, F., Gupta, R., Rose, J. A., Singh, H. P., & Bell, D. J. 2004, ApJS, van Werkhoven, T. I. M., Brogi, M., Snellen, I. A. G., & Keller, C. U. 2014, Gillon, M., Anderson, D. R., Collier-Cameron, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, M., 2014, ApJ, 784, 40 Kelley, M.S., Lindler, D.J., Bodewits, D., et al. 2013, Icarus, 222, 634. Kimura, H., Mann, I., Biesecker, D.A., & Jessberger, E.K. 2002, Icarus, 159, 152, 251 A&A, 561, 3 Kiseleva, L. G., Eggleton, P. P., & Mikkola, S, 1998, MNRAS, 300, 292 Vanderburg, A., & Johnson, J. A. 2014, PASP, 126, 948 22 Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2015 Vanderburg, A., Montet, B. T., Johnson, J. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 59 van Lieshout, R., Min, M., & Dominik, C. 2014, A&A, 572, 76 Winn, J. N., Holman, M. J., Torres, G., et al. 2008, ApJ, 683, 1076 Yanagisawa, K., Shimizu, Y., Okita, K., et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6269, 62693Q
1509.02522	1	1509	2015-09-08T20:03:19	NEOWISE Reactivation Mission Year One: Preliminary Asteroid Diameters and Albedos	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present preliminary diameters and albedos for 7,959 asteroids detected in the first year of the NEOWISE Reactivation mission. 201 are near-Earth asteroids (NEAs). 7,758 are Main Belt or Mars-crossing asteroids. 17% of these objects have not been previously characterized using WISE or NEOWISE thermal measurements. Diameters are determined to an accuracy of ~20% or better. If good-quality H magnitudes are available, albedos can be determined to within ~40% or better.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	NEOWISE Reactivation Mission Year One: Preliminary Asteroid Diameters and Albedos C. R. Nugent1, A. Mainzer2, J. Masiero2, J. Bauer2, R. M. Cutri1, T. Grav3, E. Kramer2, S. Sonnett2, R. Stevenson, and E. L. Wright4 Received ; accepted 1Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA 3Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 5 1 0 2 p e S 8 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 2 2 5 2 0 . 9 0 5 1 : v i X r a ABSTRACT We present preliminary diameters and albedos for 7,959 asteroids detected in the first year of the NEOWISE Reactivation mission. 201 are near-Earth asteroids (NEAs). 7,758 are Main Belt or Mars-crossing asteroids. 17% of these objects have not been previously characterized using WISE or NEOWISE thermal measurements. Diameters are determined to an accuracy of ∼ 20% or better. If good-quality H magnitudes are available, albedos can be determined to within ∼ 40% or better. 1. Introduction Sizes and albedos of asteroids are basic quantities that can be used to answer a range of scientific questions. A significant number of diameter measurements produce a size-frequency distribution, which can constrain models of asteroid formation and evolution (Zellner 1979; Gradie & Tedesco 1982; Tedesco et al. 2002; Bus & Binzel 2002; Masiero et al. 2011). Asteroid albedos aid the identification of collisional family members (Masiero et al. 2013; Walsh et al. 2013; Carruba et al. 2013; Milani et al. 2014; Masiero et al. 2015), and allow for basic characterization of asteroid composition (Mainzer et al. 2011c; Grav et al. 2012b; Masiero et al. 2014). Most observations of asteroids are made in visible wavelengths, where flux is dependent on both size and albedo. Observations in other wavelengths, such as the infrared (e.g. Hansen 1976; Cruikshank 1977; Lebofsky et al. 1978; Morrison & Lebofsky 1979; Delb´o et al. 2003, 2011; Matter et al. 2011; Muller et al. 2012, 2013; Wolters et al. 2005, 2008) or radio (e.g. Ostro et al. 2002; Benner et al. 2015), are needed to determine these quantities precisely. At present, well-determined diameters and albedos have been measured for less than a quarter of known asteroids. 2 The infrared NEOWISE project (Mainzer et al. 2011a) has measured diameters and albedos for ∼ 20% of the known asteroid population, the majority of these measurements to date (Mainzer et al. 2011b, 2012, 2015; Masiero et al. 2011, 2012; Grav et al. 2011, 2012a; Bauer et al. 2013). Here, we expand the number of asteroids characterized by NEOWISE, deriving diameters and albedos for asteroids detected by NEOWISE between December 13, 2013, to December 13, 2014 during the first year of the Reactivation mission. The NEOWISE mission uses the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) spacecraft, which images the entire sky using freeze-frame scanning from a sun-synchronous polar orbit (Wright et al. 2010; Cutri et al. 2012). WISE is equipped with a 50 cm telescope and four 1024x1024 pixel focal plane array detectors that simultaneously image the same 47x47 arc minute field-of-view in 3.4, 4.6, 12 and 22 µm bands, all originally cooled by solid hydrogen cryogen. WISE scans the sky between the ecliptic poles continuously during its 95 minute orbit. A tertiary scan mirror freezes the sky on the focal planes for 11 seconds while the detectors are read out, producing a sequence of adjacent images with 7.7 sec exposure times in 3.4 and 4.6 µm bands and 8.8 sec in 12 and 22 µm bands. The orbit precesses at an average rate of approximately one degree per day, so that the full sky is covered in six months. WISE was launched on December 14, 2009, and began surveying on January 7, 2010. WISE scanned the sky 1.5 times during the 9.5 months while it was cooled by its hydrogen cryogen. After the hydrogen was depleted, the survey continued as NEOWISE until February 1, 2011 using the 3.4 and 4.6 µm detectors that operated at near full sensitivity with purely passive cooling. During the additional four months of “post-cryo” operations, coverage of the entire inner Main Asteroid Belt was completed, along with a second complete coverage of the sky. WISE/NEOWISE was placed into hibernation in mid-February 2011. In this mode, the solar panels were held facing the Sun and the telescope pointed towards the north ecliptic pole. The telescope viewed the Earth during 3 half of each orbit, resulting in some heating. The WISE spacecraft was brought out of hibernation in September 2013 and renamed NEOWISE to continue its mission to discover, track and characterize asteroids through ∼ 2017 (Mainzer et al. 2014). The telescope was restored to near zenith pointing, which enabled the optics and focal planes to cool passively back to ∼ 74K. Survey operations resumed on December 13, 2013, with the 3.4 and 4.6 µm detectors operating at a sensitivity comparable to that during the original WISE cryogen survey (Cutri et al. 2015). The NEOWISE moniker, the acronym of Near-Earth Object WISE, encompasses both the archiving of individual images, to allow for the detection of transient objects, and the extensions of the mission beyond WISE’s original 9-month lifetime. NEOWISE uses the same survey and observing strategy as the original WISE mission (Wright et al. 2010). The majority of each orbit is devoted to observations, with only brief breaks for data transmission and momentum unloading. The spacecraft carries a body-fixed antenna, and therefore must reorient itself to communicate with the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS), which relays the data to Earth. Data transmission is timed to only interrupt survey coverage near the ecliptic poles, which are observed frequently. Momentum unloading, which can result in streaked images, is also completed at this time. Data processing for NEOWISE uses the WISE Science Data System (Cutri et al. 2015) that performs instrumental, photometric and astrometric calibration for each individual set of 3.4 and 4.6 µm exposures obtained by the spacecraft, and detects and characterizes sources on each exposure. The calibrated images and the database of positions and fluxes of sources extracted from those images for the first year of NEOWISE survey observations were released in March 2015 (Cutri et al. 2015). The WISE Moving Object Pipeline System (WMOPS; Cutri et al. 2012) identifies 4 sources that display motion between the different observations of the same region on the sky. WMOPS uses the extracted source lists from sets of images to first identify and filter out sources that appear stationary between individual exposures, and then links non-stationary detections into sets that exhibit physically plausible motion on the sky. Generally, objects within 70 AU of the sun move quickly enough to be detected by WMOPS (Mainzer et al. 2011a, see also Bauer et al. 2013). Those candidate moving objects that are not associated with known asteroids, comets, planets or planetary satellites are verified individually by NEOWISE scientists. A minimum of five independent detections are required for a tracklet (a set of position/time pairs) to be considered reliable. Tracklets for each verified new candidate object and previously known solar system objects are reported to the IAU Minor Planet Center (MPC) three times per week. The MPC performs initial orbit determination, associates the NEOWISE tracklets with known objects, and archives the NEOWISE astrometry and times in its observation database. Candidates confirmed by the MPC to be possible new near-Earth objects (NEOs) are posted to their NEO Confirmation page for prompt follow-up observations by ground-based observers. Rapid follow-up is essential for NEOWISE NEO candidates because the NEOWISE arcs are usually short, and the asteroid’s projected positional uncertainties grow quickly, making reliable recovery difficult after 2-3 weeks. To ensure prompt follow-up, NEOWISE observations are reported to the MPC less than three days after observations on board the spacecraft. A NEOWISE candidate discovery has a minimum of 5 observations over ∼ 3 hours, although typical objects have ∼ 12 observations spanning ∼ 1.5 days. Targets observed by NEOWISE can pose unique challenges to ground based follow-up observers. NEOWISE’s orbit allows observations to be made at all declinations, and observing is independent of lunar phase. Ground-based observers are limited to a fixed declination range, and must sometimes deal with light from the moon and terrestrial weather, which can preclude observations. Moreover, NEOWISE discoveries are frequently 5 extremely dark (see Figure 5), often requiring 2-4 m class telescopes to detect them at low solar elongations. Observers around the globe (including both amateurs and professionals) have contributed essential follow-up observations, which are defined here as an observation of an object within 15 days of its first observation on board the spacecraft. Significant contributors of follow-up observations are given in Figure 1. The Spacewatch Project (McMillan 2007) contributes a large share of recoveries in the northern hemisphere. The Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope (LCOGT) Network of robotically operated queue-scheduled telescopes (Brown et al. 2013) has been an extremely useful resource for securing detections when weather is poor at a particular site. Additionally, the group led by D. Tholen using the University of Hawaii 2.2 m and Canada-France-Hawaii 4 m telescopes has successfully detected the targets with the faintest optical magnitudes in the northern hemisphere (e.g. Tholen et al. 2014). The NEOWISE team was awarded time with the DECam instrument on the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) 4m telescope, which has proven invaluable for the recovery of low albedo objects at extreme declinations in the southern hemisphere. We present diameters and albedos for 201 near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) and 7,758 Main Belt and Mars-crossing asteroids detected in the first year of reactivation, between December 13, 2013, and December 13, 2014. This includes the 38 NEAs discovered by NEOWISE during those dates. 6 Fig. 1.— Number of follow-up observations by observatories that contributed > 5 observa- tions during the Year 1 Reactivation. Spacewatch, LCOGT, and Catalina employ multiple telescopes; their observatory codes have been grouped together. Observatory code 568, Mauna Kea, is frequently used by the Tholen group. 2. Methods 2.1. Observations The MPC is responsible for verifying and archiving asteroid astrometry. To obtain the verified record of objects found by the WMOPS pipeline in the NEOWISE data, we queried 7 the MPC observations files ‘NumObs.txt’ and ‘UnnObs.txt’ for NEOWISE (observatory code C51) observations between December 13, 2013 and December 13, 2014. This returned the list of object identifications, along with the observation times and NEOWISE measured astrometry. This included known objects and WMOPS asteroid discoveries made during that time. The NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive (IRSA, at http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu) NEOWISE-R Single Exposure Source Table was then queried for the fluxes of sources detected in the NEOWISE data. The list of detections extracted from the MPC files was con- verted into GATOR format (see http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/Gator/GatorAid/irsa/QuickGuidetoGator.htm), and uploaded into the IRSA interface using a cone search radius of 2 arcsec and a restriction that times match the MPC-archived observation time to within 2 seconds. This two-step process of querying both the MPC archive and the NEOWISE-R Single Exposure (L1b) Source Table ensures that only detections verified both by the NEOWISE object identification routines and the MPC are used for thermal modeling. While there may be additional objects in the database that were detected fewer than 5 times, or are just below the single-frame detection threshold, this method of extracting moving object detections ensures high reliability, since WMOPS actively works to exclude fixed sources such as stars and galaxies from tracklets. Sources with fewer than 5 detections or those that fall just below the single-frame detection threshold will be extracted in future processing. NEOWISE detections were further filtered using several measurement and image quality flags. We required detections to have “ph qual” values of “A”, “B”, or “C”, “cc flag” values of “0”, and “qual frame” values of “10”. The ‘ph qual” flag represents photometric quality, accepting a value of “C” or higher ensures that the sources was detected with a flux signal-to-noise ratio > 2. The “cc flag”, or contamination and confusion flag, indicates whether the source measurement may be compromised due to a nearby image artifact. By filtering for “cc flag”= 0, we select for sources unaffected by known artifacts. Finally, 8 “qual frame” is an overall quality grade for the entire image in which the source was detected. We accepted only the best-quality images, those with a score of “10”. The filtered data from the NEOWISE Single Exposure Source Table are high-quality source measurements that were found at the times and locations of NEOWISE WMOPS detections submitted to the MPC. To further guard against the possibility of confusing a minor planet with fixed background sources such as stars and galaxies, we uploaded the filtered data to the IRSA catalog query engine, referencing the WISE All-Sky Source Catalog to determine if any single-frame detections fell within 6.5 arcsec of an Atlas source. The WISE Source Catalog is generated using multiple independent single exposure images. Fast-moving solar system objects are suppressed during the construction of the catalog. A search radius of 6.5 arcsec was chosen as it is the approximate size of the WISE beam in the 3.4 and 4.6 µm bands. We required at least three observations with magnitude errors σmag ≤ 0.25 in one band. The largest main-belt asteroids (MBAs) can saturate the NEOWISE detectors, resulting in reduced photometric accuracy. Following the prescription laid out in Cutri et al. (2012) (Section IV.4), we did not consider objects that were brighter than 8.0 mag at 3.4µm and 7.0 mag at 4.6µm. The NEA measurements used in this work are given in Table 1. 9 Table 1. NEOWISE magnitudes for the NEAs modeled in this paper. Given are the time of the observation in modified Julian date (MJD), and the magnitude in the 3.4µm (W1) and 4.6µm bands (W2). Non-detections at a particular wavelength represent 95% confidence limits (Cutri et al. 2012). The aperture radius in arcsec used for aperture photometry is given under “Aperture”; “0” indicates that the pipeline profile fit photometry was used. Observations for the first three objects only are shown; the remainder are available in electronic format through the journal website. Name MJD W1 (mag) W2 (mag) Aperture 01566 56795.5373147 01566 56795.668982 01566 56795.8005219 01566 56795.8663555 01566 56795.9321892 01566 56796.1295626 01566 56796.2612299 >16.339 15.340 ± 0.132 15.270 ± 0.133 15.268 ± 0.137 15.590 ± 0.200 14.904 ± 0.097 15.829 ± 0.192 01580 56955.905682 >16.484 01580 56956.037222 01580 56956.431715 01580 56956.5631277 01580 56956.6289614 01580 56956.6946677 01580 56956.7603741 01580 56956.8262078 01580 56956.8919142 01580 56956.9576205 01580 56957.0891606 01580 56957.4179471 01620 56993.9087248 01620 56994.3030911 01620 56994.434504 01620 56994.5659171 01620 56994.5660444 01620 56994.6317509 01620 56994.7631639 01620 56994.8945768 01620 56994.8947042 01620 56994.9604107 01620 56995.0918237 01620 56995.2890705 01620 56995.4204835 >16.124 17.100 ± 0.538 16.951 ± 0.474 >16.168 16.178 ± 0.252 16.442 ± 0.316 >17.166 16.944 ± 0.523 16.206 ± 0.291 16.795 ± 0.397 >17.009 15.427 ± 0.137 15.463 ± 0.154 15.420 ± 0.144 15.596 ± 0.171 16.012 ± 0.212 15.754 ± 0.198 15.513 ± 0.145 15.794 ± 0.216 15.843 ± 0.488 15.241 ± 0.129 15.203 ± 0.109 15.354 ± 0.124 15.411 ± 0.161 10 13.317 ± 0.086 13.287 ± 0.104 13.255 ± 0.157 13.226 ± 0.125 13.395 ± 0.166 13.348 ± 0.102 13.467 ± 0.196 14.033 ± 0.171 14.230 ± 0.156 13.972 ± 0.136 14.158 ± 0.198 14.159 ± 0.157 14.312 ± 0.187 13.976 ± 0.154 13.988 ± 0.209 14.050 ± 0.134 14.282 ± 0.186 14.271 ± 0.180 13.987 ± 0.145 14.075 ± 0.156 14.049 ± 0.200 13.556 ± 0.102 14.375 ± 0.205 14.305 ± 0.221 13.846 ± 0.169 13.807 ± 0.132 14.203 ± 0.228 14.106 ± 0.155 13.988 ± 0.155 13.637 ± 0.140 13.483 ± 0.115 13.768 ± 0.175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.2. NEATM We used the Near-Earth Thermal Model (NEATM) of Harris (1998), following the implementation of Mainzer et al. (2011b, 2012) for NEAs and Masiero et al. (2011, 2012) for MBAs and Mars crossers. These results supersede those published in Mainzer et al. (2014). NEATM is a simple but effective method for determining effective spherical diameters and albedos (when corresponding visible light observations are available). This model makes several assumptions, including a spherical, non-rotating body, with a simple temperature distribution: T (θ) = Tmax cos1/4(θ) for 0 ≤ θ ≤ π/2 where θ is the angular distance from the sub-solar point. Tmax is the subsolar (cid:18)(1 − A)S (cid:19)1/4 temperature, defined as: Tmax = ησ (1) (2) where A is the bolometric Bond albedo, S is the solar flux at the asteroid, η is termed the beaming parameter, is the emissivity, and σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The beaming parameter η accounts for any deviation between the actual asteroid and the model. Changes in η can account for a host of factors including non-spherical shapes, the presence of satellites, variations in surface roughness or thermal inertia, uncertainties in emissivity, high rates of spin, changes in surface temperature distributions due to spin pole location, or the imprecise assumption that the object’s night-side has zero thermal emission (a factor Table 1—Continued Name MJD W1 (mag) W2 (mag) Aperture 01620 56995.8147225 15.912 ± 0.223 14.289 ± 0.205 0 11 that is most relevant for objects observed at high phase angles). Some of these factors accounted for in the beaming parameter are degenerate. For example, a slow-rotating object will have a heat distribution similar to a faster rotating object that has a lower thermal inertia. For this simple model, beaming accounts for the changes in temperature distribution due to these effects that cannot be otherwise separated. Observations were divided into apparitions of 10 days, and the NEATM model was fitted to each individual apparition. These shorter apparitions allowed for fits to widely-spaced apparitions or, for NEAs, over changing phase angles. Given that the NEOWISE observational cadence generally results in an object being detected over ∼ 1.5 days, sometimes with an additional epoch of observations ∼ 3 − 6 months later, we chose to divide observations separated by > 10 days for separate fitting to account for large changes in object distances and viewing geometries. NEATM spheres were approximated by a faceted polygon with 800 facets. Individual facet temperature was determined following Equation 1, and then color corrected following Wright et al. (2010). Observed thermal flux for each facet was computed, as was flux from reflected sunlight. The integrated flux from the object was determined, accounting for viewing geometry, to produce a model magnitude. A least-squares fitting routine compared modeled to observed magnitudes, and iterated on diameter, albedo, and beaming parameter until a best fit was found. Geometric optical albedo pV was computed using absolute magnitude H and slope parameter G, using values supplied in MPCORB.dat by the MPC. Inaccurate H and G values will result in inaccurate pV fits. Work by Williams (2012) and Pravec et al. (2012) found systematic H offsets that vary as a function of H magnitude in data reported to the MPC. As albedo measurements depend on H and G values, errors in measurement of those values will propagate to derived albedos. 12 NEATM requires at least one of the NEOWISE wavelengths to be dominated by thermally emitted light. Some outer main-belt objects observed by NEOWISE were too cold to have thermally dominated emission at 3.4 or 4.6 µm, and therefore diameters and albedos for those objects are not reported in this paper. The proportion of reflected vs. thermally emitted light for NEAs and inner MBAs can be seen in the spectral energy distribution plots shown in Figure 2. The proportion of thermally emitted flux depends on albedo, which means that for colder, outer MBAs it is unclear if a wavelength is thermally dominated until after the fit was performed. Comparison of those results to NEOWISE fits using 12 micron images and radar data confirmed that the thermal fits were poor, so we did not include results that had more than 25% reflected light in the 4.6µm band. We assumed that η was equal to the average value for the object’s population, as determined by Mainzer et al. (2011b) or Masiero et al. (2011), respectively. For NEAs, this meant η = 1.4 ± 0.5; for all other asteroids in this paper, η = 0.95 ± 0.25. As shown in Masiero et al. (2011), although the average η for the main belt is 1.0, the peak of the histogram is located closer to 0.95, so this value was adopted in this work. Following the average values determined by Mainzer et al. (2011b) and Masiero et al. (2011), the ratio of infrared to visible albedo pIR/pV was initially set to 1.6 ± 1.0 for NEAs and 1.5 ± 0.5 for Mars-crossers and MBAs. Additionally, it was assumed that the albedos of each band were equal, or p3.4µm = p4.6µm. Although this may be a poor assumption for objects with red slopes (Grav et al. 2012c), it is necessary to prevent over fitting of the data. 2.3. Uncertainties Uncertainties on d, pV , and η (when η was a free parameter) were determined using a Monte Carlo method. Measured NEOWISE magnitudes, H and G were randomly adjusted 13 Fig. 2.— Comparison of spectral energy distribution for a simulated NEO and inner main- belt asteroid, each with albedos ranging from pV = 0.06 to pV = 0.5. Thick lines show the flux from the asteroid as a function of wavelength, which is composed of both thermally emitted (dashed) and reflected sunlight (dotted) components. NEOWISE bands centered at 3.4 and 4.6 µm are shown as shaded cyan and purple bars, respectively. For NEAs (left), the 3.4 and 4.6 µm bands are both thermally dominated. For objects in the inner Main Belt (right), the 3.4 µm band is dominated by reflected light, and the 4.6 µm band is dominated by thermally emitted light, though the ratio between these components varies with albedo. within their errors, and the resultant model values of d, pV , and (in appropriate cases) η, were compared to the best-fit values. This process was repeated 25 times for each object, and the resultant errors are the weighted standard deviation of the Monte Carlo trials. The errors quoted in the tables below only include the random component measured through this MC method, not the systematic offset. Systematic errors were computed by comparing the match between diameters derived in this work to radar-derived diameters for the same objects. Albedos were derived from the radar diameters using the equation d = 10−H/5 1329√ pV 14 (3) where d is the diameter in kilometers (for more information, see Harris & Lagerros 2002). 2.4. Objects without visible-wavelength detections Some MBA and Mars-crossing asteroids had no visible-wavelength measurements available from the MPC. Unlike NEAs, objects determined to have these orbits by the MPC are not added to the MPC’s NEO Confirmation Page. Therefore, optical follow-up of these objects is rare, and usually serendipitous. For objects without reported optical detections, the H values in MPCORB.dat represent estimates, not measurements, and pV could not be derived. Since thermally emitted light weakly depends on albedo, d measurements are reported for these objects. However, lacking targeted follow-up, these objects have short arcs and relatively large position uncertainties, which can add additional systematic errors to the derived diameters. 2.5. NEAs NEAs were examined with particular care. Objects with bad matches between observed and modeled H values were refitted with a parameter that tightened the constraints between modeled and observed H. Finally, in some cases an assumption of fixed η = 1.4 produced a poor result. For NEAs with poor fits, beaming was varied between 1.0 and 2.0, to see if a statistically significant improvement in fit to the observed NEOWISE magnitudes could be achieved. 3. Results Results are divided into four tables. As diameters were calculated using different parameters for the NEAs vs the MBAs and Mars-crossing asteroids, results for these two 15 groups are presented separately. Results are further subdivided between objects that were characterized previously by the NEOWISE team, and objects that were not. This is because previously published values likely used the fully cryogenic 12 and 22 µm wavelengths, and therefore can derive diameters more accurately, to within 10%. Researchers looking for the best-constrained diameter and albedo measurements should consult previously published work (Mainzer et al. 2011b; Masiero et al. 2011; Mainzer et al. 2012; Masiero et al. 2012). However, for those researchers who are interested in diameters and albedos derived from additional epochs of data provided by the Year One Reactivation results, we also include the diameters derived for objects using these new data. Tables 2 and 3 contain the fit diameters and albedos for 173 new and 28 previously characterized NEAs, respectively. Tables 4 and 5 contain the fit diameters and albedos for 1,176 new and 6,579 previously characterized MBAs and Mars crossing asteroids, respectively. Several objects were observed at multiple apparitions; in these cases, results are presented for each apparition. 16 Table 2. Measured diameters (d) and albedos (pV ) of near-Earth objects not previously characterized using NEOWISE data. Magnitude H, slope parameter G, and beaming η used are given. The numbers of observations used in the 3.4 µm (nW 1) and 4.6 µm (nW 2) wavelengths are also reported, along with the amplitude of the 4.6 µm light curve (W2 amp.). Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 1566 1580 1620 1862 1862 1917 1943 1943 1943 2062 3288 4954 5381 5381 6053 7025 7889 8567 13651 35107 35107 39572 39796 53430 54686 55532 68063 68267 68348 68548 68548 85182 01566 16.90 0.15 01580 14.50 0.15 01620 15.60 0.15 01862 16.25 0.09 01862 16.25 0.09 01917 13.90 0.15 01943 15.75 0.15 01943 15.75 0.15 01943 15.75 0.15 02062 16.80 0.15 03288 15.20 0.15 04954 12.60 0.15 05381 16.50 0.15 05381 16.50 0.15 06053 14.90 0.15 07025 18.30 0.15 07889 15.20 0.15 08567 15.30 0.15 13651 17.60 0.15 35107 16.80 0.15 35107 16.80 0.15 39572 16.50 0.15 39796 15.70 0.15 53430 16.60 0.15 54686 16.50 0.15 55532 16.10 0.15 68063 15.50 0.15 68267 16.90 0.15 68348 14.20 0.15 68548 16.50 0.15 68548 16.50 0.15 85182 17.10 0.15 1.03 ± 0.04 8.55 ± 5.23 1.87 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.04 1.26 ± 0.04 4.99 ± 0.14 2.34 ± 0.05 2.30 ± 0.04 2.28 ± 0.05 0.80 ± 0.03 2.49 ± 0.07 9.56 ± 0.24 0.91 ± 0.05 0.94 ± 0.04 3.72 ± 0.08 0.50 ± 0.17 1.68 ± 0.07 2.93 ± 0.07 0.56 ± 0.02 0.91 ± 0.03 1.10 ± 0.28 1.55 ± 0.66 2.13 ± 0.59 1.23 ± 0.32 1.35 ± 0.46 1.31 ± 0.04 2.30 ± 0.07 0.88 ± 0.04 3.51 ± 0.13 1.18 ± 0.04 1.24 ± 0.04 1.03 ± 0.37 0.29 ± 0.05 0.04 ± 0.08 0.29 ± 0.04 0.29 ± 0.04 0.35 ± 0.05 0.20 ± 0.03 0.16 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.03 0.52 ± 0.10 0.24 ± 0.04 0.18 ± 0.03 0.54 ± 0.07 0.51 ± 0.06 0.14 ± 0.02 0.34 ± 0.23 0.52 ± 0.06 0.16 ± 0.03 0.51 ± 0.11 0.41 ± 0.05 0.28 ± 0.16 0.18 ± 0.16 0.20 ± 0.20 0.27 ± 0.15 0.24 ± 0.19 0.38 ± 0.06 0.21 ± 0.04 0.40 ± 0.05 0.30 ± 0.05 0.32 ± 0.04 0.29 ± 0.03 0.24 ± 0.19 17 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.52 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.52 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.37 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.39 1.40 ± 0.37 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.49 0.24 0.34 0.89 0.41 0.84 0.58 0.22 0.29 0.54 0.82 1.40 1.06 0.49 0.17 0.21 0.58 0.45 0.42 1.22 0.25 0.45 0.42 0.69 1.14 1.02 0.22 0.38 0.29 0.46 0.24 0.55 0.69 5 0 14 10 10 14 30 7 12 14 10 10 14 31 171 172 14 32 11 8 10 13 11 0 8 25 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 13 12 8 23 0 15 36 11 8 10 13 11 4 8 26 11 10 14 8 16 5 10 6 24 15 12 10 24 9 Table 2—Continued Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 85774 86819 86829 87309 88213 89355 90075 99248 99248 85774 19.20 0.15 86819 17.40 0.15 86829 15.90 0.15 87309 17.60 0.15 88213 19.70 0.15 89355 15.60 0.15 90075 15.20 0.15 99248 16.30 0.15 99248 16.30 0.15 137099 D7099 18.20 0.15 138127 D8127 17.10 0.15 138947 D8947 18.70 0.15 142781 E2781 16.10 0.15 142781 E2781 16.10 0.15 142781 E2781 16.10 0.15 143624 E3624 15.90 0.15 143624 E3624 15.90 0.15 154276 F4276 17.60 0.15 159454 F9454 17.90 0.15 159560 F9560 17.00 0.15 159560 F9560 17.00 0.15 159857 F9857 15.40 0.15 162058 G2058 17.80 0.15 162058 G2058 17.80 0.15 162080 G2080 19.80 0.15 162080 G2080 19.80 0.15 162116 G2116 19.30 0.15 162567 G2567 19.90 0.15 162741 G2741 17.30 0.15 162980 G2980 16.70 0.15 163818 G3818 18.40 0.15 172034 H2034 17.80 0.15 0.94 ± 0.01 0.80 ± 0.27 1.43 ± 0.05 0.57 ± 0.16 0.91 ± 0.42 2.04 ± 0.05 2.23 ± 0.08 1.12 ± 0.04 1.14 ± 0.37 0.56 ± 0.02 0.75 ± 0.02 0.45 ± 0.12 1.59 ± 0.05 2.01 ± 0.74 2.03 ± 0.77 2.14 ± 0.04 2.23 ± 1.08 1.06 ± 0.35 0.58 ± 0.02 1.10 ± 0.47 1.16 ± 0.30 3.07 ± 1.32 0.85 ± 0.01 0.85 ± 0.28 0.78 ± 0.06 0.82 ± 0.33 0.54 ± 0.17 0.33 ± 0.01 3.95 ± 0.04 0.79 ± 0.04 0.39 ± 0.02 0.63 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.51 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.48 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.40 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.53 1.40 ± 0.43 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.54 1.40 ± 0.39 1.40 ± 0.45 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.11 1.40 ± 0.49 1.40 ± 0.40 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 0.04 ± 0.01 0.30 ± 0.22 0.37 ± 0.05 0.50 ± 0.23 0.03 ± 0.03 0.25 ± 0.03 0.29 ± 0.04 0.43 ± 0.06 0.41 ± 0.28 0.29 ± 0.04 0.45 ± 0.06 0.29 ± 0.28 0.25 ± 0.04 0.16 ± 0.15 0.16 ± 0.09 0.17 ± 0.03 0.15 ± 0.17 0.14 ± 0.17 0.37 ± 0.04 0.24 ± 0.23 0.21 ± 0.21 0.13 ± 0.16 0.19 ± 0.02 0.19 ± 0.14 0.04 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.07 0.12 ± 0.08 0.17 ± 0.03 0.01 ± 0.00 0.66 ± 0.13 0.52 ± 0.06 0.34 ± 0.05 18 0.90 0.79 0.33 0.67 0.66 1.19 0.73 0.29 0.48 0.65 0.17 0.46 0.15 0.85 0.45 0.32 0.82 0.29 0.30 1.16 0.53 0.34 0.34 0.87 1.39 0.99 0.47 0.20 0.22 0.40 0.33 1.05 11 0 14 0 0 30 12 7 0 6 7 0 14 0 0 9 0 0 6 0 0 0 26 0 4 0 0 6 6 8 7 11 7 14 10 6 31 12 8 8 6 7 9 14 15 9 9 8 5 6 87 13 5 27 31 4 13 7 6 6 8 7 16 16 Table 2—Continued Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 190166 J0166 17.10 0.15 190166 J0166 17.10 0.15 209924 K9924 16.10 0.15 211871 L1871 18.80 0.15 214088 L4088 15.20 0.15 215588 L5588 19.50 0.15 215757 L5757 17.70 0.15 235086 N5086 17.50 0.15 235086 N5086 17.50 0.15 235086 N5086 17.50 0.15 242450 O2450 14.70 0.15 242450 O2450 14.70 0.15 250620 P0620 18.00 0.15 267337 Q7337 18.00 0.15 269690 Q9690 18.40 0.15 271480 R1480 17.50 0.15 274138 R4138 17.80 0.15 275976 R5976 16.30 0.15 275976 R5976 16.30 0.15 276274 R6274 17.20 0.15 276468 R6468 17.90 0.15 285944 S5944 16.50 0.15 285944 S5944 16.50 0.15 297418 T7418 18.60 0.15 299582 T9582 18.00 0.15 303174 U3174 16.70 0.15 304330 U4330 18.90 0.15 304330 U4330 18.90 0.15 322763 W2763 16.90 0.15 326388 W6388 18.20 0.15 334673 X4673 17.90 0.15 349219 Y9219 18.20 0.15 1.01 ± 0.03 1.05 ± 0.02 1.86 ± 0.71 0.41 ± 0.01 2.42 ± 0.06 0.49 ± 0.16 0.78 ± 0.27 1.02 ± 0.40 1.02 ± 0.32 1.08 ± 0.33 2.54 ± 0.10 2.91 ± 0.08 0.65 ± 0.14 0.44 ± 0.10 0.89 ± 0.43 0.71 ± 0.22 0.75 ± 0.02 1.86 ± 0.04 2.38 ± 0.03 1.53 ± 0.71 1.03 ± 0.37 1.04 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.43 0.41 ± 0.02 0.62 ± 0.02 1.50 ± 0.03 0.61 ± 0.01 0.78 ± 0.01 1.25 ± 0.03 1.26 ± 0.57 0.57 ± 0.22 0.58 ± 0.15 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.48 1.40 ± 0.51 1.40 ± 0.38 1.40 ± 0.38 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.33 1.40 ± 0.43 1.40 ± 0.59 1.40 ± 0.48 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.52 1.40 ± 0.42 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.41 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.52 1.40 ± 0.60 1.40 ± 0.41 0.25 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.03 0.19 ± 0.12 0.32 ± 0.05 0.25 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.12 0.24 ± 0.17 0.17 ± 0.18 0.17 ± 0.11 0.15 ± 0.12 0.36 ± 0.13 0.27 ± 0.04 0.26 ± 0.13 0.58 ± 0.25 0.10 ± 0.11 0.35 ± 0.22 0.24 ± 0.03 0.15 ± 0.03 0.09 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.17 0.11 ± 0.14 0.41 ± 0.03 0.23 ± 0.19 0.39 ± 0.05 0.29 ± 0.03 0.16 ± 0.03 0.13 ± 0.02 0.08 ± 0.01 0.20 ± 0.04 0.06 ± 0.12 0.38 ± 0.25 0.27 ± 0.23 19 0.92 0.68 0.40 0.28 0.63 0.57 0.47 1.04 1.64 0.85 0.41 0.83 0.29 0.21 0.31 0.82 0.48 1.01 1.11 0.91 0.36 0.16 0.51 0.93 0.31 0.65 0.13 0.23 0.27 0.33 0.67 0.58 6 12 0 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 11 13 0 0 0 0 7 5 15 0 0 10 0 5 7 21 11 12 12 0 0 0 7 12 7 7 8 5 11 60 32 29 11 14 4 4 7 6 7 5 16 5 5 10 29 5 7 23 11 12 13 8 11 14 Table 2—Continued Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 363505 a3505 18.10 0.15 368184 a8184 19.50 0.15 369264 a9264 16.30 0.15 377732 b7732 17.00 0.15 377732 b7732 17.00 0.15 381677 c1677 18.40 0.15 381677 c1677 18.40 0.15 387733 c7733 18.90 0.15 387733 c7733 18.90 0.15 387746 c7746 20.00 0.15 388838 c8838 19.50 0.15 388838 c8838 19.50 0.15 389694 c9694 18.20 0.15 391211 d1211 18.50 0.15 393359 d3359 19.20 0.15 393569 d3569 20.20 0.15 399433 d9433 18.60 0.15 399433 d9433 18.60 0.15 406952 e6952 17.10 0.15 408751 e8751 19.00 0.15 409256 e9256 18.20 0.15 409836 e9836 18.10 0.15 410088 f0088 18.10 0.15 410778 f0778 18.10 0.15 411201 f1201 17.80 0.15 411611 f1611 18.80 0.15 413038 f3038 16.90 0.15 413038 f3038 16.90 0.15 413192 f3192 16.80 0.15 413421 f3421 18.30 0.15 413820 f3820 19.80 0.15 414286 f4286 18.60 0.15 1.90 ± 0.05 0.38 ± 0.12 1.51 ± 0.47 0.95 ± 0.03 0.99 ± 0.03 0.47 ± 0.01 0.44 ± 0.16 0.34 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.09 0.37 ± 0.01 0.36 ± 0.01 0.38 ± 0.01 0.45 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.09 0.77 ± 0.33 0.55 ± 0.01 1.34 ± 0.56 1.76 ± 0.89 0.77 ± 0.21 0.40 ± 0.01 1.89 ± 0.68 0.55 ± 0.19 1.03 ± 0.01 1.46 ± 0.57 0.66 ± 0.01 0.36 ± 0.10 1.24 ± 0.03 1.01 ± 0.04 3.96 ± 1.84 1.90 ± 0.78 0.66 ± 0.26 0.37 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.42 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.54 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.38 1.40 ± 0.52 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.49 1.40 ± 0.53 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.40 1.40 ± 0.49 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.41 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.43 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.41 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.38 0.03 ± 0.01 0.19 ± 0.19 0.23 ± 0.20 0.31 ± 0.05 0.29 ± 0.03 0.35 ± 0.05 0.40 ± 0.21 0.41 ± 0.06 0.47 ± 0.25 0.13 ± 0.02 0.21 ± 0.04 0.20 ± 0.02 0.46 ± 0.06 0.42 ± 0.23 0.06 ± 0.11 0.05 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.09 0.02 ± 0.05 0.43 ± 0.23 0.28 ± 0.03 0.03 ± 0.04 0.33 ± 0.25 0.10 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.03 0.31 ± 0.05 0.41 ± 0.21 0.20 ± 0.04 0.30 ± 0.04 0.02 ± 0.05 0.02 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.04 0.47 ± 0.19 20 0.66 0.54 0.65 0.62 0.16 0.92 0.47 0.22 0.37 0.23 0.61 0.24 0.22 0.85 0.51 0.22 0.24 0.16 0.64 0.84 0.84 1.78 0.14 0.38 1.45 0.81 1.19 1.79 0.62 1.39 0.97 0.54 12 0 0 5 5 19 0 11 0 5 18 12 4 0 0 13 0 0 0 68 0 0 9 0 12 0 22 23 0 0 0 0 12 25 7 5 5 19 5 11 5 6 18 12 5 17 30 14 10 9 5 69 4 14 10 6 15 31 23 25 18 23 36 27 Table 2—Continued Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 414286 418797 418929 419624 419624 419880 f4286 18.60 0.15 f8797 19.40 0.15 f8929 17.00 0.15 f9624 20.50 0.15 f9624 20.50 0.15 f9880 19.60 0.15 2000 AG205 K00AK5G 19.70 0.15 2002 XS40 K02X40S 20.10 0.15 2003 CC11 K03C11C 19.10 0.15 2003 SS214 K03SL4S 20.10 0.15 2004 BZ74 K04B74Z 18.10 0.15 2004 MX2 K04M02X 19.30 0.15 2004 TG10 K04T10G 19.40 0.15 2005 LS3 K05L03S 19.50 0.15 2006 BB27 K06B27B 20.00 0.15 2007 BG K07B00G 19.50 0.15 2007 RU10 K07R10U 19.10 0.15 2008 QS11 K08Q11S 19.90 0.15 2009 ND1 K09N01D 17.10 0.15 2010 OQ1 K10O01Q 19.00 0.15 2011 CQ4 K11C04Q 18.40 0.15 2012 DN K12D00N 18.10 0.15 2013 PX6 K13P06X 18.40 0.15 2013 WT44 K13W44T 19.30 0.15 2013 WU44 K13W44U 21.00 0.15 2013 YZ13 K13Y13Z 19.60 0.15 2013 YP139 K13YD9P 21.60 0.15 2014 AA33 K14A33A 19.30 0.15 2014 AQ46 K14A46Q 20.10 0.15 2014 AA53 K14A53A 19.80 0.15 2014 BG60 K14B60G 20.10 0.15 2014 BE63 K14B63E 23.20 0.15 0.40 ± 0.09 0.70 ± 0.29 1.43 ± 0.02 0.34 ± 0.14 0.36 ± 0.13 0.98 ± 0.06 0.95 ± 0.01 0.76 ± 0.03 1.13 ± 0.51 0.86 ± 0.25 0.96 ± 0.02 1.26 ± 0.08 1.32 ± 0.61 0.38 ± 0.10 0.22 ± 0.05 0.31 ± 0.11 0.92 ± 0.37 0.45 ± 0.01 2.50 ± 0.95 0.54 ± 0.21 0.66 ± 0.02 2.77 ± 1.05 1.65 ± 0.03 0.65 ± 0.01 0.29 ± 0.13 0.31 ± 0.10 0.40 ± 0.03 0.79 ± 0.04 0.59 ± 0.29 0.70 ± 0.27 0.67 ± 0.25 0.36 ± 0.13 0.40 ± 0.24 0.06 ± 0.07 0.14 ± 0.03 0.09 ± 0.17 0.09 ± 0.14 0.03 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.00 0.03 ± 0.00 0.03 ± 0.10 0.02 ± 0.02 0.11 ± 0.02 0.02 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.04 0.19 ± 0.12 0.38 ± 0.21 0.24 ± 0.19 0.05 ± 0.06 0.09 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.04 0.15 ± 0.14 0.18 ± 0.02 0.01 ± 0.03 0.03 ± 0.00 0.08 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.19 0.27 ± 0.19 0.03 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.11 0.04 ± 0.06 0.04 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.40 1.40 ± 0.50 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.50 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.53 1.40 ± 0.35 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.09 1.40 ± 0.51 1.40 ± 0.38 1.40 ± 0.38 1.40 ± 0.51 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.39 1.40 ± 0.51 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.38 1.40 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.61 1.40 ± 0.46 1.09 ± 0.07 1.40 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.60 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.46 0.71 0.32 0.54 0.57 0.46 0.20 0.79 0.18 0.49 0.75 0.65 0.35 0.64 0.64 0.98 0.38 0.31 0.33 0.70 0.47 0.29 0.42 0.19 0.31 0.26 0.07 0.25 0.19 0.47 0.50 1.30 0.42 0 0 48 0 0 6 12 14 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 0 5 0 9 6 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 29 7 49 18 6 6 14 14 16 16 5 9 8 7 5 5 9 11 11 8 7 7 10 6 8 6 6 4 17 13 163 5 21 Table 2—Continued Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 2014 CY4 K14C04Y 21.10 0.15 2014 DC10 K14D10C 20.10 0.15 2014 ED K14E00D 19.30 0.15 2014 EN45 K14E45N 21.20 0.15 2014 EZ48 K14E48Z 18.80 0.15 2014 EZ48 K14E48Z 18.80 0.15 2014 EQ49 K14E49Q 21.80 0.15 2014 ER49 K14E49R 18.60 0.15 2014 HE3 K14H03E 19.90 0.15 2014 HQ124 K14HC4Q 18.90 0.15 2014 HF177 K14HH7F 19.70 0.15 2014 JL25 K14J25L 23.00 0.15 2014 JH57 K14J57H 16.60 0.15 2014 JH57 K14J57H 16.60 0.15 2014 JN57 K14J57N 20.70 0.15 2014 KX99 K14K99X 18.20 0.15 2014 LQ25 K14L25Q 20.00 0.15 2014 LR26 K14L26R 18.50 0.15 2014 MQ18 K14M18Q 15.60 0.15 2014 NB39 K14N39B 19.50 0.15 2014 NE52 K14N52E 17.90 0.15 2014 NC64 K14N64C 20.50 0.15 2014 NM64 K14N64M 22.60 0.15 2014 OY1 K14O01Y 19.10 0.15 2014 OZ1 K14O01Z 21.00 0.15 2014 PC68 K14P68C 20.40 0.15 2014 PF68 K14P68F 18.20 0.15 2014 QK433 K14Qh3K 18.30 0.15 2014 RH12 K14R12H 23.50 0.15 2014 RL12 K14R12L 17.90 0.15 2014 RL12 K14R12L 17.90 0.15 2014 SR339 K14SX9R 18.60 0.15 0.57 ± 0.25 0.89 ± 0.01 0.49 ± 0.13 0.37 ± 0.13 0.45 ± 0.01 0.44 ± 0.11 0.38 ± 0.13 0.46 ± 0.15 0.56 ± 0.15 0.41 ± 0.17 0.25 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.06 4.61 ± 0.03 6.79 ± 3.81 0.27 ± 0.10 1.72 ± 0.68 0.94 ± 0.32 2.08 ± 0.90 5.27 ± 3.50 1.08 ± 0.15 0.70 ± 0.22 0.50 ± 0.19 0.33 ± 0.12 0.60 ± 0.21 0.73 ± 0.29 0.56 ± 0.20 3.33 ± 2.06 1.78 ± 0.75 0.09 ± 0.04 0.69 ± 0.02 0.61 ± 0.17 0.97 ± 0.37 0.02 ± 0.04 0.02 ± 0.00 0.14 ± 0.14 0.04 ± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.04 0.27 ± 0.21 0.02 ± 0.03 0.30 ± 0.26 0.06 ± 0.04 0.29 ± 0.22 0.36 ± 0.06 0.02 ± 0.03 0.02 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.10 0.03 ± 0.05 0.02 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.03 0.04 ± 0.07 0.02 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.27 0.04 ± 0.02 0.01 ± 0.02 0.11 ± 0.09 0.01 ± 0.03 0.04 ± 0.04 0.01 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.06 0.09 ± 0.11 0.25 ± 0.03 0.33 ± 0.19 0.07 ± 0.07 1.40 ± 0.52 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.39 0.75 ± 0.24 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.38 1.40 ± 0.42 1.40 ± 0.49 1.40 ± 0.34 1.40 ± 0.57 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.34 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.37 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.52 1.40 ± 0.18 1.40 ± 0.47 0.82 ± 0.29 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.43 1.40 ± 0.49 1.40 ± 0.43 1.20 ± 0.48 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.54 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.42 1.40 ± 0.46 0.35 0.90 0.57 0.16 1.10 0.47 0.42 0.51 0.18 0.80 0.39 0.68 0.11 0.30 0.69 0.43 0.48 0.65 0.54 0.08 0.66 0.64 0.82 0.30 0.38 0.39 0.60 0.79 0.75 0.31 0.83 0.69 0 9 0 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 10 6 12 6 6 5 9 5 10 12 5 6 5 4 9 5 6 8 7 9 6 25 6 21 8 12 10 10 5 6 13 22 Table 2—Continued Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 2014 TW57 K14T57W 20.10 0.15 2014 TF64 K14T64F 20.10 0.15 2014 TJ64 K14T64J 21.30 0.15 2014 TJ64 K14T64J 21.30 0.15 2014 UG176 K14UH6G 21.50 0.15 2014 US192 K14UJ2S 18.70 0.15 2014 UF206 K14UK6F 18.80 0.15 2014 UH210 K14UL0H 21.10 0.15 2014 VP35 K14V35P 22.70 0.15 2014 WJ70 K14W70J 17.60 0.15 2014 XQ7 K14X07Q 20.60 0.15 2014 XX7 K14X07X 19.80 0.15 2014 XX31 K14X31X 17.60 0.15 0.47 ± 0.01 0.70 ± 0.20 0.52 ± 0.20 0.52 ± 0.23 0.42 ± 0.12 0.87 ± 0.01 1.63 ± 0.79 0.40 ± 0.16 0.12 ± 0.05 2.92 ± 1.21 0.65 ± 0.29 1.20 ± 0.38 1.35 ± 0.49 0.07 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.03 0.02 ± 0.02 0.02 ± 0.03 0.03 ± 0.03 0.08 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.04 0.04 ± 0.06 0.10 ± 0.10 0.02 ± 0.04 0.02 ± 0.05 0.01 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.15 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.35 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.54 1.40 ± 0.39 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.49 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.53 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.55 1.40 ± 0.36 1.40 ± 0.43 0.76 0.33 0.46 0.55 0.17 0.25 0.62 0.76 0.36 0.62 0.83 0.43 0.42 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 31 14 8 5 17 5 6 27 8 6 8 23 Table 3. Measured diameters (d) and albedos (pV ) of near-Earth asteroids. Objects in this table have previously reported measurements by the NEOWISE team (Mainzer et al. 2011b, 2012). Previous measurements use detections in 12 µm and 22 µm bands, and therefore are better constrained. Magnitude H, slope parameter G, and beaming η used are given. The numbers of observations used in the 3.4 µm (nW 1) and 4.6 µm (nW 2) wavelengths are also reported, along with the amplitude of the 4.6 µm light curve (W2 amp.). Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 2102 2102 2102 3554 4183 4183 6050 25916 27346 40263 40267 85628 90367 90367 137062 138847 162181 162483 162566 163691 243566 262623 276049 277616 395207 395207 397237 02102 16.00 0.15 02102 16.00 0.15 02102 16.00 0.15 03554 15.82 0.15 04183 14.40 0.15 04183 14.40 0.15 06050 14.80 0.15 25916 13.60 0.15 27346 15.90 0.15 40263 17.70 0.15 40267 15.40 0.15 85628 17.00 0.15 90367 17.70 0.15 90367 17.70 0.15 D7062 16.60 0.15 D8847 16.90 0.15 G2181 18.20 0.15 G2483 17.50 0.15 G2566 15.70 0.15 G3691 17.00 0.15 O3566 17.40 0.15 Q2623 18.50 0.15 R6049 16.80 0.15 R7616 17.40 0.15 d5207 19.60 0.15 d5207 19.60 0.15 d7237 16.70 0.15 1998 SB15 J98S15B 20.90 0.15 2009 UX17 K09U17X 21.50 0.15 2010 LF86 K10L86F 17.30 0.15 2010 LO97 K10L97O 18.70 0.15 2010 NG3 K10N03G 17.20 0.15 1.68 ± 0.05 1.65 ± 0.05 1.69 ± 0.06 1.56 ± 0.07 2.94 ± 0.12 3.54 ± 0.12 2.88 ± 0.07 5.96 ± 0.13 1.80 ± 0.07 0.92 ± 0.35 2.39 ± 0.09 0.78 ± 0.03 1.76 ± 0.79 2.00 ± 0.89 0.99 ± 0.06 0.94 ± 0.28 0.73 ± 0.02 0.69 ± 0.20 6.00 ± 2.42 3.06 ± 1.55 0.88 ± 0.02 0.49 ± 0.15 4.03 ± 1.85 1.28 ± 0.01 0.60 ± 0.20 0.73 ± 0.30 1.73 ± 0.66 0.36 ± 0.12 0.39 ± 0.13 2.30 ± 0.89 1.40 ± 0.57 1.45 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.04 0.26 ± 0.04 0.25 ± 0.03 0.34 ± 0.06 0.36 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.04 0.26 ± 0.04 0.18 ± 0.03 0.24 ± 0.04 0.17 ± 0.18 0.21 ± 0.04 0.46 ± 0.08 0.05 ± 0.13 0.04 ± 0.03 0.41 ± 0.05 0.35 ± 0.19 0.17 ± 0.03 0.37 ± 0.21 0.03 ± 0.04 0.03 ± 0.06 0.25 ± 0.04 0.29 ± 0.18 0.02 ± 0.04 0.12 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.03 0.05 ± 0.10 0.12 ± 0.16 0.06 ± 0.09 0.03 ± 0.03 0.04 ± 0.04 0.03 ± 0.06 0.11 ± 0.02 24 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.48 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.51 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.40 1.40 ± 0.54 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.40 1.40 ± 0.49 1.40 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 0.44 1.40 ± 0.40 1.40 ± 0.41 1.40 ± 0.47 1.40 ± 0.00 0.23 0.18 0.67 0.49 1.04 0.62 1.51 0.63 0.43 0.71 1.06 0.64 0.54 0.49 0.89 1.01 0.32 0.62 1.02 0.30 0.29 0.48 0.54 0.28 0.32 0.50 0.40 0.66 0.86 0.21 0.57 0.64 13 5 8 19 12 17 57 24 9 0 4 7 0 0 6 0 25 0 0 0 11 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 13 5 9 20 12 18 57 29 9 14 4 10 12 13 6 26 25 9 24 5 11 4 6 4 8 19 4 11 15 7 15 17 Table 3—Continued Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 2010 NG3 K10N03G 17.20 0.15 2014 HJ129 K14HC9J 21.10 0.15 1.74 ± 0.94 0.59 ± 0.21 0.08 ± 0.18 0.02 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.59 1.40 ± 0.42 0.80 0.50 0 0 17 9 25 Table 4. Measured diameters (d) and albedos (pV ) of MBAs and Mars crossers. Objects in this table do not have previously published diameters and albedos by the NEOWISE team. Beaming η, H, G, the amplitude of the 4.6 µm light curve (W2 amp.), and the numbers of observations used in the 3.4 µm (nW 1) and 4.6 µm (nW 2) wavelengths are also reported. For a small (< 1%) fraction of objects, diameter fits could not reproduce optical magnitudes for a realistic range of albedos. This may be due to a large light curve amplitude, uncertainty in G slope values used to derive H magnitudes, or other reasons noted in Mainzer et al. (2011b); Masiero et al. (2011); Mainzer et al. (2012); Masiero et al. (2012). These objects are marked with a † in the name column. Objects without reported albedos did not have measured H values, see text for details. Only the first 15 lines are shown; the remainder are available in electronic format through the journal website. Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 21 65 69 74 74 140 144 147 147 160 212 212 253 284 00021 7.35 0.11 00065 6.62 0.01 00069 7.05 0.19 00074 8.66 0.15 00074 8.66 0.15 00140 8.34 0.15 00144 7.91 0.17 00147 8.70 0.15 00147 8.70 0.15 00160 9.08 0.15 00212 8.28 0.15 00212 8.28 0.15 00253 10.30 0.15 00284 10.05 0.11 99.47 ± 27.12 276.58 ± 74.49 131.07 ± 32.19 111.87 ± 46.38 105.13 ± 29.95 82.63 ± 20.19 131.36 ± 33.30 144.68 ± 47.63 119.59 ± 37.39 69.62 ± 13.23 132.58 ± 48.48 129.09 ± 40.48 50.35 ± 17.16 54.47 ± 20.59 0.16 ± 0.12 0.06 ± 0.04 0.19 ± 0.07 0.04 ± 0.03 0.05 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.07 0.05 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.04 0.05 ± 0.03 0.05 ± 0.04 0.04 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.03 0.95 ± 0.19 0.95 ± 0.17 0.95 ± 0.18 0.95 ± 0.23 0.95 ± 0.16 0.95 ± 0.18 0.95 ± 0.17 0.95 ± 0.19 0.95 ± 0.18 0.95 ± 0.14 0.95 ± 0.20 0.95 ± 0.19 0.95 ± 0.24 0.95 ± 0.23 0.27 0.09 0.09 0.26 0.24 0.37 0.31 0.11 0.20 0.58 0.16 0.17 0.43 0.21 10 8 14 3 9 7 10 6 9 20 5 7 16 11 10 10 14 4 9 7 10 6 9 21 5 7 16 11 26 27 Table 5. Measured diameters (d) and albedos (pV ) of MBA and Mars crossing asteroids. Objects in this table have previously reported measurements by the NEOWISE team (Masiero et al. 2011, 2012). Previous measurements use detections in 12 µm and 22 µm bands, and therefore are better constrained. H, G, beaming η, the amplitude of the 4.6 µm light curve (W2 amp.), and the numbers of observations used in the 3.4 µm (nW 1) and 4.6 µm (nW 2) wavelengths are also reported. For a small (< 1%) fraction of objects, diameter fits could not reproduce optical magnitudes for a realistic range of albedos. This may be due to a large light curve amplitude, uncertainty in G slope values used to derive H magnitudes, or other reasons noted in Mainzer et al. (2011b); Masiero et al. (2011); Mainzer et al. (2012); Masiero et al. (2012). These objects are marked with a † in the name column. Only the first 15 lines are shown; the remainder are available in electronic format through the journal website. Name Packed H G d (km) pV η W2 amp. nW 1 nW 2 13 24 30 33 34 35 36 36 38 40 40 41 45 47† 48† 00013 6.74 0.15 00024 7.08 0.19 00030 7.57 0.15 00033 8.55 0.33 00034 8.51 0.15 00035 8.50 0.15 00036 8.46 0.15 00036 8.46 0.15 00038 8.32 0.15 00040 7.00 0.15 00040 7.00 0.15 00041 7.12 0.10 00045 7.46 0.07 00047 7.84 0.16 00048 6.90 0.15 202.64 ± 50.08 151.82 ± 49.32 93.51 ± 23.53 48.78 ± 9.98 114.12 ± 43.76 143.02 ± 55.51 102.44 ± 31.81 92.34 ± 39.98 114.16 ± 28.20 95.55 ± 17.94 107.07 ± 19.23 198.74 ± 61.71 181.92 ± 59.39 107.18 ± 33.79 165.38 ± 41.80 0.06 ± 0.03 0.08 ± 0.04 0.26 ± 0.15 0.25 ± 0.13 0.04 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.03 0.05 ± 0.02 0.06 ± 0.05 0.05 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.09 0.29 ± 0.10 0.05 ± 0.07 0.05 ± 0.03 0.07 ± 0.03 0.06 ± 0.03 0.95 ± 0.16 0.95 ± 0.20 0.95 ± 0.21 0.95 ± 0.19 0.95 ± 0.24 0.95 ± 0.21 0.95 ± 0.19 0.95 ± 0.25 0.95 ± 0.16 0.95 ± 0.16 0.95 ± 0.16 0.95 ± 0.20 0.95 ± 0.21 0.95 ± 0.20 0.95 ± 0.15 0.32 0.20 0.39 0.41 0.17 0.34 0.21 0.30 0.13 0.26 0.25 0.13 0.14 0.28 0.42 9 15 13 15 21 11 10 6 14 12 23 19 11 14 11 9 15 13 15 22 11 10 6 14 12 23 19 11 14 11 28 29 Results were compared to previous work by the NEOWISE team (Mainzer et al. 2011b; Masiero et al. 2011; Mainzer et al. 2012; Masiero et al. 2012). Figure 3 shows the comparison between diameter and albedo measurements of MBAs. As observed in Masiero et al. (2011), asteroids in the Main Belt group into bright and dark types, with a greater fraction of bright objects found in the inner regions of the belt. Objects that were also modeled with the thermophysical model of Wright (2007) are given in Table 6. When possible, derived diameters were compared to diameter measurements made from radar data. Radar-derived diameters are ideal for this purpose, as they are derived via an independent method (Benner et al. 2015). This comparison is shown in Figure 4. Although the histograms in the figure are not perfectly Gaussian, a best-fit Gaussian to their forms gives fitted σ values, which indicates a 14% relative accuracy in diameter, and a 29% relative accuracy in albedo. These values are consistent with previous NEOWISE 3-band data results (Mainzer et al. 2012; Masiero et al. 2012). From this comparison to radar-derived diameters and previous work, we conclude that diameters are determined to an accuracy of ∼ 20% or better. If good-quality H magnitudes are available, albedos can be determined to within ∼ 40% or better. Roughly 3% of objects in this work have significantly different derived diameters than previously published NEOWISE values. It is possible that some of these objects are elongated. NEOWISE collects a sparsely-sampled lightcurve for each object, and for Table 6. Measured diameters and albedos for three objects using the model of Wright (2007). Name D (km) pV 68267 138127 285944 0.89 ± 0.27 0.94 ± 0.15 1.37 ± 0.23 0.38 ± 0.32 0.35 ± 0.08 0.34 ± 0.08 30 Fig. 3.— Histogram of MBA diameters (top) and albedos (bottom) measured in this work (blue), and values for the same objects measured by the NEOWISE team previously (green). The two albedo peaks are due to the predominance of bright S-type (pV = 0.25) and dark C-type (pV = 0.06) objects in the Main Belt. example, it is possible that the prime mission happened to observe these objects in a more edge-on shape, whereas the reactivation observations tended to observe a wider side of the object. Alternatively, changes in viewing geometry between epochs could result in different 31 diameter measurements; a pole-on viewing geometry could have a larger cross section than a geometry aligned with the plane of the equator. For a small (< 1%) fraction of objects, diameter fits could not reproduce optical magnitudes for a realistic range of albedos. This may be due to a large light curve amplitude (see column W2 amp. for the amplitude of the 3.4 µm band light curve, though note that this is a sparsely sampled light curve), uncertainty in G slope values used to derive H magnitudes, or other reasons noted in Mainzer et al. (2011b); Masiero et al. (2011); Mainzer et al. (2012); Masiero et al. (2012). Poor-quality H values can drive albedo fits to extremes; therefore very low (∼ 0.01) measurements may be signs of this phenomenon. We have plotted the diameters and albedos of NEOWISE Year One Reactivation discoveries, along with all NEAs detected by NEOWISE (Figure 5). The trend observed in Mainzer et al. (2014) is also present here: NEOWISE tends to discover darker NEAs than optical surveys. This is a direct consequence of the infrared wavelengths that NEOWISE employs. 3.1. NHATS Targets Five objects in this paper meet the NEO Human Space Flight Accessible Targets Study qualifications (Barbee et al. 2013). These objects are listed in Table 7. If an object was observed over multiple epochs, values of d and pV in this table are the averages of the values and associated errors derived at each of those epochs. Asteroid 419624 was discovered in 2010 by NEOWISE. 32 4. Conclusion We present preliminary diameters and albedos for 7,959 asteroids observed in the first year of the NEOWISE Reactivation mission. Five of these objects are NHATS targets. Future work by the NEOWISE team includes preliminary characterization results from the continuing mission. Uncertainties on d and pV are consistent with the errors measured during the initial post-cryo mission. NEOWISE is expected to maintain this pace of detection and NEO discovery for the extent of its mission, currently expected to run through 2017. These results demonstrate the power of infrared survey telescopes to characterize basic physical parameters for large numbers of small bodies. 5. Acknowledgments CRN was partially supported by an appointment to the NASA Postdoctoral Program at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), administered by Oak Ridge Associated Universities through a contract with NASA. This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and JPL/California Institute of Technology, funded by NASA. This publication also makes use of data products from NEOWISE, which is a project of the JPL/California Institute of Technology, funded by the Planetary Science Division of NASA. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive. The JPL High-Performance Computing Facility used for our simulations is supported by the JPL Office of the CIO. This project used data obtained with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam), which was constructed by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) collaboration. Funding for the DES Projects has been provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. National Science Foundation, 33 the Ministry of Science and Education of Spain, the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom, the Higher Education Funding Council for England, the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, the Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago, the Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University, the Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas A&M University, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos, Funda¸cao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo `a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient´ıfico e Tecnol´ogico and the Minist´erio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and the Collaborating Institutions in the Dark Energy Survey. The Collaborating Institutions are Argonne National Laboratory, the University of California at Santa Cruz, the University of Cambridge, Centro de Investigaciones En´ergeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnol´ogicas- Madrid, the University of Chicago, University College London, the DES-Brazil Consortium, the University of Edinburgh, the Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the Institut de Ci`encies de l’Espai (IEEC/CSIC), the Institut de F´ısica d’Altes Energies, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen and the associated Excellence Cluster Universe, the University of Michigan, the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, the University of Nottingham, the Ohio State University, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Portsmouth, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, the University of Sussex, and Texas A&M University. This work makes use of observations from the LCOGT network. Follow-up included observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States), the National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), 34 the Australian Research Council (Australia), Ministrio da Cincia, Tecnologia e Inovao (Brazil) and Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologa e Innovacin Productiva (Argentina). We thank the anonymous referee for their thoughtful and thorough consideration of our manuscript. 35 Fig. 4.— Top: Comparison of radar-derived diameters and albedos to the values derived in this paper. Dashed red line is shows a 1:1 relation. Bottom: %∆d (left) and %∆pV (right) are the fractional differences between the NEOWISE Reactivation radar-derived diameters and albedos, respectively. Dashed red line is best-fit Gaussian, with the fitted σ given in the legends. 36 Fig. 5.— NEOWISE detects large NEAs, and discoveries tend to be dark. Cyan circles are measured diameters and albedos of objects detected in the first year of NEOWISE’s Reactivation mission; black squares indicate NEAs discovered by NEOWISE. Error bars on detected objects omitted for clarity. Table 7. Measured diameters and albedos for objects that meet NHATS criteria. Also included are the minimum round trip time in days, as determined by the Barbee et al. (2013) study. Name D (km) pV Minimum round trip (days) 1943 Anteros 35107 363505 387733 419624 2.30 ± 0.05 1.00 ± 0.15 1.90 ± 0.05 0.33 ± 0.05 0.35 ± 0.13 0.17 ± 0.02 0.34 ± 0.10 0.03 ± 0.01 0.44 ± 0.15 0.09 ± 0.15 354 354 314 354 362 37 REFERENCES Barbee, B. W., Abell, P. A., Adamo, D. R., et al. 2013, 2013 IAA Planetary Defense Conference Proceedings Bauer, J. M., Grav, T., Blauvelt, E., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 773, 22 Benner, L., Busch, M. B., Giorgini, J. D., Taylor, P. A., & Margot, J. L. 2015, Asteroids IV Brown, T. M., Baliber, N., Bianco, F. B., et al. 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 1031 Bus, S. J. & Binzel, R. P. 2002, Icarus, 158, 146 Carruba, V., Domingos, R. C., Nesvorn´y, D., et al. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 433, 2075 Cruikshank, D. P. 1977, Icarus, 30, 224 Cutri, R. M., Mainzer, A., Conrow, T., et al. 2015, 1, explana- tory Supplement to the NEOWISE Data Release Products, http://wise2.ipac.caltech.edu/docs/release/neowise/expsup Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2012, 1, http://wise2.ipac.caltech.edu/docs/release/allsky/expsup/sec8 1.html Delb´o, M., Harris, A. W., Binzel, R. P., Pravec, P., & Davies, J. K. 2003, Icarus, 166, 116 Delb´o, M., Walsh, K., Mueller, M., Harris, A. W., & Howell, E. S. 2011, Icarus, 212, 138 Gradie, J. & Tedesco, E. 1982, Science, 216, 1405 Grav, T., Mainzer, A. K., Bauer, J., et al. 2012a, The Astrophysical Journal, 744, 197 —. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 742, 40 38 Grav, T., Mainzer, A. K., Bauer, J. M., Masiero, J. R., & Nugent, C. R. 2012b, The Astrophysical Journal, 759, 49 —. 2012c, The Astrophysical Journal, 759, 49 Hansen, O. L. 1976, The Astronomical Journal, 81, 74 Harris, A. W. 1998, Icarus, 131, 291 Harris, A. W. & Lagerros, J. S. V. 2002, Asteroids III, 205 Lebofsky, L. A., Veeder, G. J., Lebofsky, M. J., & Matson, D. L. 1978, Icarus, 35, 336 Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Cutri, R. M., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 792, 30 Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Grav, T., et al. 2011a, The Astrophysical Journal, 731, 53 Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Bauer, J., et al. 2011b, The Astrophysical Journal, 743, 156 Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Masiero, J., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 760, L12 —. 2011c, The Astronomical Journal, 736 Mainzer, A., Usui, F., & Trilling, D. E. 2015, Asteroids IV Masiero, J. R., DeMeo, F., Kasuga, T., & Parker, A. H. 2015, Asteroids IV Masiero, J. R., Grav, T., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 791, 121 Masiero, J. R., Mainzer, A. K., Bauer, J. M., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 770, 7 Masiero, J. R., Mainzer, A. K., Grav, T., et al. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 741, 68 —. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 759, L8 Matter, A., Delb´o, M., Ligori, S., Crouzet, N., & Tanga, P. 2011, Icarus, 215, 47 39 McMillan, R. S. 2007, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 236, IAU Symposium, ed. G. B. Valsecchi, D. Vokrouhlick´y, & A. Milani, 329–340 Milani, A., Cellino, A., Knezevi´c, Z., et al. 2014, Icarus, 239, 46 Morrison, D. & Lebofsky, L. 1979, Radiometry of asteroids, ed. T. Gehrels, 184–205 Muller, T. G., Miyata, T., Kiss, C., et al. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 558, A97 Muller, T. G., O’Rourke, L., Barucci, A. M., et al. 2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 548, A36 Ostro, S. J., Hudson, R. S., Benner, L. A. M., et al. 2002, Asteroids III, 151 Pravec, P., Harris, A. W., Kusnir´ak, P., Gal´ad, A., & Hornoch, K. 2012, Icarus, 221, 365 Tedesco, E. F., Noah, P. V., Noah, M., & Price, S. D. 2002, The Astronomical Journal, 123, 1056 Tholen, D. J., Mainzer, A. K., Bauer, J. M., et al. 2014, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 145 Walsh, K. J., Delb´o, M., Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlick´y, D., & Lauretta, D. S. 2013, Icarus, 225, 283 Williams, G. V. 2012, PhD thesis, Open University UK Wolters, S. D., Green, S. F., McBride, N., & Davies, J. K. 2005, Icarus, 175, 92 —. 2008, Icarus, 193, 535 Wright, E. L. 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, The Astronomical Journal, 140, 1868 40 Zellner, B. 1979, Asteroid taxonomy and the distribution of the compositional types, ed. T. Gehrels, 783–806 This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. 41 E1 E1NOTE TO EDITOR: Complete Tables 1, 4, and 5 should appear in online supplementary material. 42
1110.3935	1	1110	2011-10-18T11:09:37	Variation of Area-to-Mass-Ratio of HAMR Space Debris Objects	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	An unexpected space debris population has been detected in 2004 Schildknecht et al. (2003, 2004) with the unique properties of a very high area-to-mass ratio (HAMR) Schildknecht et al. (2005a). Ever since it has been tried to investigate the dynamical properties of those objects further. The orbits of those objects are heavily perturbed by the effect of direct radiation pressure. Unknown attitude motion complicates orbit prediction. The area-to-mass ratio of the objects seems to be not stable over time. Only sparse optical data is available for those objects in drift orbits. The current work uses optical observations of five HAMR objects, observed over several years and investigates the variation of their area-to-mass ratio and orbital parameters. A normalized orbit determination setup has been established and validated with two low and two of the high ratio objects, to ensure, that comparable orbits over longer time spans are determined even with sparse optical data.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 -- 10 (2011) Printed 31 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Variation of Area-to-Mass-Ratio of HAMR Space Debris Objects C. Fruh1 ⋆† and T. Schildknecht1 1Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland Accepted 2011 October 12. Received 2011 October 11; in original form 2011 August 5, the definitve version is available at www.blackwell- synergy.com ABSTRACT An unexpected space debris population has been detected in 2004 Schildknecht et al. (2003, 2004) with the unique properties of a very high area-to-mass ratio (HAMR) Schildknecht et al. (2005a). Ever since it has been tried to investigate the dynamical properties of those objects further. The orbits of those objects are heavily perturbed by the effect of direct radiation pressure. Unknown attitude motion complicates orbit prediction. The area-to-mass ratio of the objects seems to be not stable over time. Only sparse optical data is available for those objects in drift orbits. The current work uses optical observations of five HAMR objects, observed over several years and investigates the variation of their area-to-mass ratio and orbital parameters. A normalized orbit determination setup has been established and validated with two low and two of the high ratio objects, to ensure, that comparable orbits over longer time spans are determined even with sparse optical data. Key words: analysis celestial mechanics -- catalogues -- space debris -- observational data 1 INTRODUCTION The Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern (AIUB) detected high area-to-mass ratio (HAMR) objects in GEO-like orbits in 2004 Schildknecht et al. (2003, 2004, 2005a). Since then, the AIUB observes HAMR objects on a regular basis and keeps a small catalog of HAMR and other space debris objects, which are not listed in the USSTRATCOM catalog. The observations are performed with the one meter ESA Space Debris Telescope (ESASDT), located on Tenerife, Spain, and the one meter Zimmerwald Laser and Astrometry Telescope (ZIMLAT), located in Zimmerwald, Switzerland. Additional observations for some objects, which were detected by the AIUB, are provided by courtesy of the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Moscow, via the ISON network. Maintaining a catalogue of HAMR objects is especially challenging due to the unique properties of these objects; the orbits are highly perturbed by direct radiation pressure. Regular observations on short time intervals are mandatory. In routine orbit determination for catalogue maintenance, ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] (TS) † corresponding author [email protected] (CF); variations in the value of the effective area-to-mass ratio (AMR) were detected, first investigations were performed Musci et al. (2010). For the investigations presented in this paper orbits are determined with an enhanced version of the CelMech tool Beutler (2005). The area-to-mass (AMR) value is determined as a scaling parameter of the direct radiation pressure. The acceleration due to the direct radiation pressure is calculated as: ~arad = C 2 · S c · AU 2 ~r − ~r⊙2 · A m · ~r − ~r⊙ ~r − ~r⊙ , (1) where ~r is the geocentric position of the satellite, ~r⊙ the geocentric position vector of the sun, AU the as- tronomical unit, A the effective cross section exposed to the radiation, m the mass of the satellite, and c the speed of light. C is the reflection coefficient. The direct radiation pressure is determined under the assumption of a spherically shaped object. In contrast to the calculation of the radiation pressure acceleration by other sources (compare e.g. Vallado & McCain (2001)), the coefficient C is divided by two in the formula above. A value for C has to be chosen, by default, 2.0 is selected in the standard processing. This corresponds to an assumption of full absorption. All AMR values presented in this paper have 2 C. Fruh and T. Schildknecht Table 1. Internal name, eccentricity, inclination (deg), semi-major axis (km), area-to-mass ratio (m2/kg) and apparent magnitude (mag) of the selected objects of the AIUB catalogue observations are allowed per set. An observation set may consist of more than one tracklet. But the observations within the sets should not be distributed over more than three days. NAME Epoch a e i AMR Mag E03174A 55208.0 E06321D 55275.9 E06327E 54470.1 E08241A 55213.0 41900 41400 40000 41600 0.001 0.035 0.067 0.041 10.1 7.00 12.31 13.26 0.01 2.29 0.20 1.24 14.6 15.3 17.2 16.1 to be interpreted as the effective area-to-mass ratio scaled with C/2 = 1; the AMR values of other sources may be scaled with a different factor. It is assumed that the AMR is constant over the orbital fit interval. A default value of 0.02 m2kg−1 is selected, which corresponds to an AMR value of a standard GPS satellite, in case the AMR parameter is not estimated but kept fixed in the orbit determina- tion. For HAMR objects always an AMR value is estimated. The shadow paths of the orbit are modeled, under the assumption of a spherical earth on a mean circular orbit; the boundary between sunlit and eclipsed part is assumed to be cylindrical, no distinction between penumbra and umbra is made, earth atmosphere is neglected. For a long term investigation of the orbits and the AMR values, different comparable orbits have to be deter- mined. Only sparse observations are available, which are unequally spaced in time. A normalized setup is developed, tested with two low AMR objects and two of the HAMR objects of the AIUB catalog and applied for the creation of comparable orbits for the investigation of the HAMR objects. 2 NORMALIZED SPARSE DATA SETUP 2.1 The Method Four representative GEO objects from the internal cata- logue of the AIUB were chosen, they have been followed over longer time periods and are not listed in the USSTRAT- COM catalogue. Those objects are clearly space debris, since no maneuvers could be detected in the data. The AIUB did not have information what those objects actually were before becoming debris. From the apparent magnitude it can be concluded that those are all fragmentation pieces. They represent typical objects found in GEO surveys. Their properties are listed in Tab. 1. Orbits were determined for different spacings of two observation sets stemming a) from one observation site only and b) from different sites. In the first case, the observations either stem from ZIMLAT or from ESASDT only. In the second case, not only the observations of ZIMLAT and ESASDT were combined but also observations of the ISON network, if available. When observations from different sites are used in orbit determination, the distribution is either that the first set of observations stems from one site and the second from another, or that there are observations from different sites at similar epochs used within the first and/or the last set of observations or a mixture of those options. In the figures the label ALL is applied, when observations of ZIMLAT (labeled ZIM ), the ESASDT and of the ISON network are combined; the label SDT-ZIM is applied, if only the observations of ZIMLAT and the ESASDT are used. The distances between the observations and the ephemerides of the predicted orbits of the four objects for a prediction interval of 50 days after the last observation used for orbit determination were determined. The distances were averaged and a mean value and standard deviation was calculated. Between six and 50 single distances between ephemerides and observations were averaged. The predicted ephemeris positions are compared to the optical angle-only observations, which were not used in orbit determination. Angular distances are determined on the celestial sphere. The observation used for the comparison stem from ZIMLAT and ESASDT and serve as ground truth. Calibration measurements with high accuracy ephemerides of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) satellites provided by International GNSS Service (IGS) showed an accuracy of the measurements of ZIMLAT and ESASDT of below one arcsecond. That the further observations in fact belong to the same object is validated via an orbit determination with both the observations used in the original sparse data orbit determination and the observations, which they were compared to. An orbit deter- mination with a root-mean-square of below two arcseconds is a reliable tool to associate observations of this accuracy of the same object to each other, as shown with cluster observations in Musci et al. (2005). 2.2 Results Two of the objects have low area to mass ratios, two objects qualify as HAMR objects with an AMR value larger than 1m2/kg. The optical angle-only observations are obtained with ZIMLAT (Zimmerwald, Switzerland), and ESASDT (Tenerife, Spain), supplemented by some observations of the ISON network provided by the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Moscow, Russia. The latter observations were obtained from different sites of the ISON network, in these particular cases, all located in Eastern Europe. In Fig. 1 the angular distance between predicted and observed position are displayed as a function of the time interval between the first and the last observation, which were used in orbit determination. Displayed are the mean values and the standard deviations of the angular distances of the single orbits. The mean value and standard devia- tions are determined with the single angular distances of predicted position to observed ones, all within 50 days since orbit determination. All orbits were determined from two observation sets only, using a priori orbital elements. A maximum of eight Figure 1 shows that the angular distances are in gen- eral very small. The vast majority of the determined orbits Variation of Area-to-Mass-Ratio of HAMR Space Debris Objects 3 [ht] (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 1. Angular distances as a function of the time interval between the first and the last observation of the fit interval of orbit determination for object (a) E03174A, (b) E06321D, (c) E06327E and (d) E08241A. [h] (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 2. Root mean square of orbit determination as a function of the arc length of observations for object (a) E03174A, (b) E06321D, (c) E06327E and (d) E08241A. [h] (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 3. Angular distances as a function of the number of observations used for orbit determination for object (a) E03174A, (b) E06321D, (c) E06327E and (d) E08241A. [h] (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 4. Angular distances as a function of anomaly distribution factor for object (a) E03174A, (b) E06321D, (c) E06327E and (d) E08241A. 4 C. Fruh and T. Schildknecht [h] (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 5. Angular distance as a function of time interval covered by observations used for orbit determination for object (a) E03174A, (b) E06321D, (c) E06327E and (d) E08241A. [h] (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 6. Time interval covered by the observations within the sets as a function of the number of observations used for orbit determination for object (a) E03174A, (b) E06321D, (c) E06327E and (d) E08241A. even produce distances smaller than 0.6 degrees. Except for the first object, each object also shows some outliers, with larger angular distances. These larger distances also tend to show larger standard deviations. The value of the angular distances seems to be, at least in this setup, quite independent of how large the difference between the first and the last observations of the fit interval is. Moreover, Figure 1 also shows that there is no significant difference in using observations only from one observation site for orbit determination or using observations from different sites. It could not be shown that the latter approach is more advantageous for orbit determination. Different observation sites still have advantages in terms of availability, weather conditions, which results in a larger amount of observations, which are available. In Fig. 2, the root mean square of the orbit determinations is shown, which were used for the prediction, as a function of the angular distance. No trend is visible, all orbits, which were determined had a small root mean square of below three arcseconds. In Fig. 3, the angular distances are displayed as a function of the actual number of single observations that entered orbit determination. It can be seen that no strong correlation is visible between the actual number of observa- tions used and the value for the distances. To find a measure for the true anomaly distribution, an anomaly distribution measure fano was defined: It would be ideal to distribute all n observations equally spaced with an angle of 2π/n between each observation. The deviation from this ideal distribution is determined and normalized with the number of observations. The smaller fano, the better distributed are the observations in anomaly. fano = 1 n vuut n−1 X i=1 (cid:0) 2π n − (ai+1 − ai)(cid:1)2 + (cid:0) 2π n − (a1 + 2π − an)(cid:1)2 , (2) where as n is the number of observations and ai with i = 1, .., n are the anomalies of the single observations, in ascending anomaly order. The angular distances as a function of fano are displayed in Fig. 4. There is no clear correlation between the fano and the distances, as it is expected for objects with small eccentricities. Object E06327E, with the highest eccentricity of e=0.06, has the strongest correlation with fano. The crucial factor however, seems to be the time in- terval covered by observations itself within the sets. In Fig 5, the angular distances are displayed as a function of the time interval covered within the two sets used in the beginning and the end of the fit interval, without the time gap in between the two sets. A strong correlation is visible. Fig. 6 shows that there is no strong correlation between the number of used observations and the time interval covered within the sets. For example for the ESASDT observation strategy, primarily densely spaced observations are available. The investigation of the data displayed in Fig. 6 showed that a coverage of at least 1.2 hours for both sets together seems to be necessary, in order to gain an orbit which allows to safely re-detect the investigated objects in more than Variation of Area-to-Mass-Ratio of HAMR Space Debris Objects 5 [ht] (a) (b) (c) Figure 7. Inclination as a function of time for orbits of the object (a)E08241A, (b) E06321D, (c) E07194A, (d) E07308B, (e) E06293A. (d) (e) [h] (a) (b) (c) Figure 8. Eccentricity as a function of time for orbits of the object (a) E08241A, (b) E06321D, (c) E07194A, (d) E07308B, (e) E06293A. (d) (e) 90 percent of all cases with a field of view of one square degree, that is to have an accuracy of below 0.5 degrees. 3 INVESTIGATION OF HAMR OBJECTS IN SPARSE DATA SETUP The dynamical properties of HAMR objects were studied in the normalized sparse data setup established in the previous section. Orbits are determined with two observation sets only. The sets consist of four to eight observations each. The observations are required to span at least a time interval of 1.2 hours within the sets and need to be well spread over the anomaly for the objects in orbits with a high eccentricity. The total fit interval for orbit determination ranges between 10 and 120 days. As shown in the previous section the comparability of the orbits do not seem to be dependent on these ranges. The orbits were first determined with observations from one observation site only, then with observations from different sites in the setup mentioned above. The observations used in this investigation stem from the ESASDT, ZIMLAT, and from several telescopes of the ISON network. 6 C. Fruh and T. Schildknecht [ht] (a) (b) (c) Figure 9. AMR as a function of time for orbits of the object (a) E08241A, (b) E06321D, (c) E07194A, (d) E07308B, (e) E06293A. (d) (e) [h] (a) (b) Figure 10. Relative variation of AMR value as a function of the absolute AMR value of (a) 47 HAMR and (b) LAMR objects. 3.1 Selected Objects Five objects were selected for a detailed investigation. All objects were discovered and first detected by the AIUB and are not listed in the USSTRATCOM catalogue. All objects are faint debris objects. They were tracked successfully over several years, and no maneuvers were detected. A set of osculating orbital elements and an average value for the apparent magnitudes are listed in Tab. 2. The two objects with the lowest AMR values, E08241A and E06321D, which were used in the investigation of the sparse data orbit determination, are used here again. 3.2 Evolution of Orbital Elements The evolution of the orbital elements over time is in- spected in a first step. Figure 7 shows the development of the inclination and its errors in inclination, of the five objects. The error bars are too small, to be visible in the plot in most cases. The inclination values of the Table 2. Investigated HAMR objects: Internal name, epoch (MJD), eccentricity, inclination (deg), semi-major axis (km), area to mass ratio (m2/kg) and apparent mag- nitude (mag). NAME Epoch a e i AMR Mag E08241A 55213.0 E06321D 55275.9 E07194A 54877.0 E07308B 54416.0 E06293A 54951.0 41600 41400 40900 35600 40200 0.041 0.035 0.005 0.264 0.245 13.26 7.00 7.31 7.63 11.06 1.24 2.29 3.37 8.83 15.41 16.1 15.3 16.8 15.8 16.8 different orbits are closely aligned to each other and mark a consistent evolution, only in the case of object E08241A in Fig. 7 a wider spread in the inclination values can be observed. The orbits determined with observations from the different observation sites produce almost identical results. For object E07308B and E06293A, which have the highest AMR values, the inclination seems not to follow a steady increase over time, but some smaller periodic substructure seems to be superimposed. These may very well be the perturbations with a period of one nodal Variation of Area-to-Mass-Ratio of HAMR Space Debris Objects 7 [h] (a) (b) (c) Figure 11. Angular distances of predicted orbits on the celestial sphere as a function of AMR for orbits of the object (a) E08241A, (b) E06321D, (c) E07194A, (d) E07308B, (e) E06293A. (d) (e) [h] (a) (b) (c) Figure 12. Error of the AMR value as a function of AMR as estimated in orbits of the object (a) E08241A, (b) E06321D, (c) E07194A, (d) E07308B, (e) E06293A. (d) (e) year, which are well known for objects with high AMR, see e.g., Liou & Weaver (2005), Schildknecht et al. (2005b). 3.3 Evolution of Area to Mass Ratio Value Figure 8 shows the evolution of the eccentricity values and its errors estimated in orbit determination for the different objects. Periodic variations can be observed for all objects. The different orbits with observations from one site only or from different sites result in the same eccentricities. Figure 9 shows the AMR values as a function of time for the objects listed in Tab. 2. In all cases, the values for the AMR do not show clear and obvious common trends, see Fig. 7 and 8. For object E08241A, the AMR values vary around a mean value of 1.4 m2kg−1 with no obvious trend or periodic signal, see Fig. 9a. For object E06321D (see Fig. 9b), the AMR value seems to vary periodically with a period of about one year around 8 C. Fruh and T. Schildknecht [h] (a) (b) (c) Figure 13. Absolute values and standard deviations of the angular distances as a function of the error of the AMR value as found in orbit determination of the object (a) E08241A, (b) E06321D, (c) E07194A, (d) E07308B, (e) E06293A. (d) (e) a value of 2.5 m2kg−1, but also values of 2.35 m2kg−1 and 2.65 m2kg−1 occur. Similar results were obtained by Musci et al. (2010), for the same object, in different orbit determination setups. The AMR value of object E07194A (see Fig. 9c) varies around 3.5 m2kg−1, but in the orbits determined with combined observations from all the sites, so-called outliers of 4.5 m2kg−1 and 2.3 m2kg−1 occur as well. These have, however large error values. to generally in- Object E07308B (see Fig. 9d) crease its AMR value over time from a value of 8.5 m2kg−1 up to 9.0 m2kg−1. But single orbits also show AMR values of i.e. 10 m2kg−1. seems that object E06293A, which is the Figure 9e shows object with the largest AMR value regarded here, has significant data gaps. A general trend of the AMR value in time, increasing from 15.5 m2kg−1 to 16.5 m2kg−1 cannot be excluded. But one orbit determined with ESASDT data also shows a value of 18.2 m2kg−1, with a small formal error. No general correlation between the AMR value itself and the variations of the AMR value could be determined, no general trend is visible. A study on the variation of AMR values was conducted by Schildkecht et al. (to be published 2011). The variations of the AMR values of 47 HAMR objects were investigated and compared to the AMR variations of orbits of 40 low AMR (LAMR) value objects. No normalized or sparse data setup orbit determination setup was chosen. The AMR values in that analysis were determined in the standard orbit determina- tion procedure at the AIUB, with fit arcs as long as possible for a successful, that is defined as leading to a small rms error, orbit determination. The results are illustrated in Fig. 10. No general trend in the AMR variations could be determined for either HAMR or LAMR objects. The relative variations of the AMR values of the LAMR objects were larger, than the AMR variations of the HAMR values. The AMR variations of the LAMR objects were of the order of several 100 percent. All orbits were predicted and compared to additional observations of the same object, which were not used for orbit determination. The additional observations were all checked via orbit determination, to ensure that they belong to the same object. Figure 11 shows the angular distances between the predicted ephemeris and observations. The values are averaged over all distances 50 days after orbit determination and their standard deviations serve as error bars. Figure 11a shows that for object E08241A, one orbit produces the largest distances of one degree. This orbit does not show up prominently in the orbital parameter plots (see Fig. 8a and 7a) or AMR value plots (see Fig. 9a). The orbit with ZIMLAT data, which produced the outlier AMR value of 0.82m2kg−1, does not show up prominently in the distance plot (Fig. 11a). The mean value of all angular distances of object E06321D are well below 0.2 degrees, but four orbits show large standard deviations in the angular distance, as Fig. 11b shows. All of them have been determined with combined observations from ZIMLAT, ESASDT, and ISON obser- vations. Their AMR values are 2.36 m2kg−1, 2.50 m2kg−1, 2.57 m2kg−1, and 2.66 m2kg−1. The orbits with the AMR value of 2.36 m2kg−1 does show up also in a group of outlier AMR values, which do not seem to follow the periodic variation in the evolution of the AMR values. The other orbits, with large standard variations in the angular distance do not show up prominently (Fig. 9b). Those orbits with the largest standard variation in angular distance do not show the largest error in the AMR values either, as Fig. 13 shows. Variation of Area-to-Mass-Ratio of HAMR Space Debris Objects 9 shows Figure 11c for object E07194A three angular distances with large standard deviations. The orbits were determined with observations from all sites. They have AMR values of 2.12 m2kg−1, 2.21 m2kg−1, and 4.46 m2kg−1. Those are the smallest and largest AMR values in the deter- mined orbits for E07194A. These three values do also show up as outliers in Fig. 9c. For objects E07308B and E06293A, the angular distances with a large standard variation (see Fig. 11d and e), do not show significant outlier AMR values in Fig. 9d and e. For object E07308B, the orbit with an AMR value of 10.15 m2kg−1 shows the largest mean value in the angular distance of almost 0.7 degrees but has a small standard deviation in this distance (Fig. 11d). This value is significantly different compared to the other determined AMR values, see Fig. 9d. The dependency of the AMR value on the error of the AMR, as it was found in orbit determination, is investigated in the final step. No clear correlation could be determined between the AMR value and its rms value (Fig. 12). Figure 13 shows the angular distance distances on the celestial sphere as a function of the error of the AMR value. As expected, for none of the objects a clear correlation between the error of the AMR value and the absolute value of the distances or the standard deviation of the distances could be determined. All investigated objects show variations in the AMR value, but not a common characteristic in these variations. It has to be noted that the result may be affected by the relatively simple shadowing model that was used in orbit determination; as it was shown Pardini & Anselmo (2008), Valk & Lemaıtre (2008), shadowing effects have a signifi- cant influence on the long term evolution of orbits of HAMR objects. Investigation of simulated orbits with numerical and semi-analytical methods, e.g. by Valk & Lemaıtre (2008), Valk et al. (2008) also showed the existence of irregular chaotic orbits and the significant influence of secondary resonances on the orbits of HAMR objects. However, these simulations did assume a constant AMR value. Complex attitude motion, irregular shapes, and/or deformation of the actual objects, could lead to an actual change in the AMR value itself over time, which may not be averaged out over the fit interval of orbit determination. 4 CONCLUSIONS A sparse data setup was established to create compa- rable orbits over longer time intervals. Orbits with two data sets only do produce small differences between the propagated ephemerides and further observations, as long as 1.2 hours are covered within the sets. Other factors, such as that the observations stem from different sites or the time interval between the sets, are found to be negligible. The orbits of high area-to-mass ratio (HAMR) objects were analyzed in this setup. The AMR value, that is the scaling factor of the direct radiation pressure (DRP) parameter, varies over time. The order of magnitude of the variation of the area-to-mass ratio (AMR) value was not correlated with the order of magnitude of its error. The variation of the AMR is not averaged out in the fit interval of orbit determination. In the evolution of the AMR value over time, no common characteristic could be determined for different HAMR objects. Further work on the orbits of HAMR objects is needed, to improve the radiation pressure model, to determine possible attitude motion or deformations and to understand also resonance effects and the existence of chaotic regions. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Special thank goes to ISON and the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Moscow, for the supplementary observations. The work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation through grants 200020-109527 and 200020- 122070. The observations under ESA/ESOC contracts 17835/03/D/HK. The authors thank the reviewer for useful hints. from the ESASDT were acquired 15836/01/D/HK and REFERENCES Beutler, G. 2005. Methods of Celestial Mechanics. Two Vol- umes. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. ISBN: 3-540-40749-9 and 3-540-40750-1. Liou, J.-C., & Weaver, J.K. 2005. Orbital Dynamics of High Area-to-Mass Ratio Debris and Their Distribution in the Geosynchronos Region. In: Proceedings of the Forth Eu- ropean Conference on Space Debris, pp. 119-124, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany, 18-20 April 2005. Musci, R., Schildknecht, T. Flohrer, T. & Beutler, G. 2005. Concept for a Catalogue of Space Debris in GEO. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Space Debris, pp. 601-606, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany, 18-20 April 2005. Musci, R., Schildknecht, T. & Ploner, M. 2010. Analyzing long Observation Arcs for Objects with high Area-to-Mass Ratios in Geostationary Orbits. In: Acta Astronautica, vol. 66, pp 693-703. Pardini, C., & Anselmo, L. 2008. Long-Term Evolution of Geosynchronous Orbital Debris with High Area-to-Mass Ratios. Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci., 51, 22 -- 27. Schildkecht, T., Fruh, C. Hinze, A. & Herzog, J.to be pub- lished 2011. Dynamical Properties of High Area to Mass Ratio Objects in GEO-Like Orbits. Advances in Space Research. Schildknecht, T., Musci, R. Ploner, M. Flury, W. Kuusela, J. de Le´on Cruz, J. & de Fatima Dom´ınguez Palmero, L. 2003. An Optical Search for Small-Size Debris in GEO and GTO. In: Proceedings of the 2003 AMOS Technical Conference, 9-12 September 2003, Maui, Hawaii, USA. Schildknecht, T., Musci, R. Ploner, M. Beutler, G. Kuusela, J. de Le´on Cruz, J. & de Fatima Dom´ınguez Palmero, L. 2004. Optical Observations 10 C. Fruh and T. Schildknecht of Space Debris in GEO and in Highly-Eccentric Orbits. Advances in Space Research, 34(5), 901 -- 911. Schildknecht, T., Musci, R. Flury, W. Kuusela, J. de Le´on Cruz, J. & de Fatima Dom´ınguez Palmero, L. 2005a. Optical Observations of Space Debris in High- Altitude Orbits. In: Proceedings of the Forth European Conference on Space Debris, pp. 113-118, ESOC, Darm- stadt, Germany, 18-20 April 2005. Schildknecht, T., Musci, R. Flury, W. Kuusela, J. de Le´on Cruz, J. & de Fatima Dom´ınguez Palmero, L. 2005b. Properties of the High Area-to-Mass Ratio Space Debris Population in GEO. In: Proceedings of the 2005 AMOS Technical Conference, 5-9 September 2005, Maui, Hawaii, USA. Valk, S., & Lemaıtre, A. 2008. Semi-Analytical Investiga- tions of High Area-to-Mass Ratio geosynchronous Space Debris Including Earth's Shadowing Effects. Advances in Space Research, 42(8), 1429 -- 1443. Valk, S., Delsate, N. Lemaıtre, A. & Carletti, T. 2008. Semi-Analytical Investigations of High Area-to-Mass Ra- tio geosynchronous Space Debris Including Earth's Shad- owing Effects. Advances in Space Research, 43(10), 1509 -- 1526. Vallado, D., & McCain, W. 2001. Fundmentals of Astrody- namics and Applications. Microcosm Press, El Segundo, California. ISBN 0-7923-6903-3.
1211.6365	1	1211	2012-11-27T17:25:46	AKARI/IRC 18 Micron Survey of Warm Debris Disks	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	Context. Little is known about the properties of the warm (Tdust >~ 150 K) debris disk material located close to the central star, which has a more direct link to the formation of terrestrial planets than the low temperature debris dust that has been detected to date. Aims. To discover new warm debris disk candidates that show large 18 micron excess and estimate the fraction of stars with excess based on the AKARI/IRC Mid-Infrared All-Sky Survey data. Methods. We have searched for point sources detected in the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey, which show a positional match with A-M dwarf stars in the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue and exhibit excess emission at 18 micron compared to that expected from the Ks magnitude in the 2MASS catalogue. Results. We find 24 warm debris candidates including 8 new candidates among A-K stars. The apparent debris disk frequency is estimated to be 2.8 +/- 0.6%. We also find that A stars and solar-type FGK stars have different characteristics of the inner component of the identified debris disk candidates --- while debris disks around A stars are cooler and consistent with steady-state evolutionary model of debris disks, those around FGK stars tend to be warmer and cannot be explained by the steady-state model.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy&Astrophysicsmanuscript no. ms November 1, 2018 c(cid:13) ESO 2018 AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks Hideaki Fujiwara1, Daisuke Ishihara2, Takashi Onaka3, Satoshi Takita4, Hirokazu Kataza4, Takuya Yamashita5, Misato Fukagawa6, Takafumi Ootsubo7, Takanori Hirao8, Keigo Enya4, Jonathan P. Marshall9, Glenn J. White10,11, Takao Nakagawa4, and Hiroshi Murakami4 2 1 0 2 v o N 7 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 5 6 3 6 . 1 1 2 1 : v i X r a 1 Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 650 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA e-mail: [email protected] 2 Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan 3 Department of Astronomy, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 4 Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5210, Japan 5 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan 6 Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan 7 Astronomical Institute, Tohoku University, 6-3 Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan 8 Research Institute of Science and Technology for Society, Japan Science and Technology Agency, K's Gobancho Bldg, 7, Gobancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0076, JAPAN 9 Departmento F´ısica Te´orica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Aut´onoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain 10 Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK 11 Space Science & Technology Department, The Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0QX, UK Received 19 June 2012 / Accepted 21 November 2012 ABSTRACT Context. Little is known about the properties of the warm (Tdust & 150 K) debris disk material located close to the central star, which has a more direct link to the formation of terrestrial planets than the low temperature debris dust that has been detected to date. Aims.To discover new warm debris disk candidates that show large 18 µm excess and estimate the fraction of stars with excess based on the AKARI/IRC Mid-Infrared All-Sky Survey data. Methods. We have searched for point sources detected in the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey, which show a positional match with A-M dwarf stars in the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue and exhibit excess emission at 18 µm compared to that expected from the KS magnitude in the 2MASS catalogue. Results. We find 24 warm debris candidates including 8 new candidates among A-K stars. The apparent debris disk frequency is estimated to be 2.8 ± 0.6%. We also find that A stars and solar-type FGK stars have different characteristics of the inner component of the identified debris disk candidates -- while debris disks around A stars are cooler and consistent with steady-state evolutionary model of debris disks, those around FGK stars tend to be warmer and cannot be explained by the steady-state model. Key words. circumstellar matter -- zodiacal dust -- infrared: stars 1. Introduction Some main-sequence stars are known to have dust disks around them. Primordial dust grains that originally exist in protoplane- tary disks around T Tauri stars or Herbig Ae/Be stars are dissi- pated before their central stars reach the main-sequence phase. Therefore the circumstellar dust grains around main-sequence stars should be composed of second generation dust grains re- plenished during the main-sequence phase, rather than primor- dial dust from protoplanetary disks. These second generation dust grains are thought to have originated from collisions of planetesimals, or during the destruction of cometary objects (e.g. Backman & Paresce 1993; Lecavelier Des Etangs et al. 1996), giving a reason why circumstellar dust disks around main- sequence stars are named "debris disks." Debris disks are ex- pected to be related to the stability of minor bodies, and poten- tially the presence of planets around stars (e.g. Wyatt 2008). Debris disks are identified from the spectral energy distri- butions (SEDs) of stars that show an excess over their expected photospheric emission at infrared (IR) wavelengths, since cir- cumstellar dust grains absorb the stellar light and re-emit mainly in the IR region. The first example of the debris disk, around Vega, was discovered through its excess emission at wavelengths of & 60 µm by Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) in 1980s (Aumann et al. 1984). After the discovery of the Vega debris disk, more than 100 other debris disks were identified from the IRAS catalogue. A number of new debris disk candidates have been discovered recently, even though the IRAS mission flew more than 20 years ago (Rhee et al. 2007). The power of a next generation all-sky survey satellite mission like AKARI (Murakami et al. 2007) to take forward the debris disk search is evident. Most of the known debris disks only show excess far-infrared (FIR) emission at wavelengths longer than 25 µm. This excess comes from the thermal emission of dust grains with low tem- peratures (Tdust ∼ 100 K), and is an analogue of Kuiper belt objects in the Solar System. Recently Herschel (Pilbratt et al. 2010) has provided FIR data for debris disks with high sensitiv- ity and high spatial resolution and is opening a new horizon of research on cold debris disks (e.g. Thompson et al. 2010). For example, Eiroa et al. (2011) discovered cold (Tdust . 20 K), faint debris disks towards three GK stars, which might be in a 1 Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks new class of coldest and faintest disks discovered so far around mature stars and which cannot easily be explained by invoking classical debris disk models. In addition, some cold debris disks have been spatially resolved by Herschel (e.g. Lohne et al. 2012; Liseau et al. 2010). On the other hand, little is known to date about the warm (Tdust & 150 K) debris disk material located close to the star, which should be an analogue of the asteroid belt in the Solar System. Warm dust grains in the inner region of debris disks should have a more direct link to the formation of terrestrial planets than the low temperature dust that has been previously studied (Meyer et al. 2008). Recent high-sensitivity surveys at 10 − 20 µm allow us to investigate the properties of this inner debris disk material. AKARI is a Japanese IR satellite dedicated primarily to an IR all-sky survey (Murakami et al. 2007). It was launched in February 2006. The Mid-Infrared (MIR) All-Sky Survey was performed using 9 and 18 µm broad band filters with the InfraRed Camera (IRC; Onaka et al. 2007) onboard AKARI un- til August 2008 (Ishihara et al. 2010), and a complementary FIR survey at 65 -- 160 µm was performed with the Far-Infrared Surveyor (Yamamura et al. 2010). We show that the data from the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey is very powerful to identify warm debris disks and to contribute to increase the number of sample with its higher sensitivity and spatial resolution than those of IRAS. Here we report initial results of survey of warm debris disks around main-sequence stars based on the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey. 2. 18 µm Excess Search with AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey 2.1. InputCatalogue:Tycho-2SpectralTypeCatalogue In this work, we use the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue (Wright et al. 2003) as an input catalogue. The Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue lists spectral types for 351864 of the Tycho- 2 stars by cross-referencing Tycho-2 to several catalogues that have spectral types (the Michigan Catalogue for the HD Stars, Volumes 1-5 (Houk & Cowley 1975; Houk 1978, 1982; Houk & Smith-Moore 1988; Houk & Swift 1999); the Catalogue of Stellar Spectra Classified in the Morgan-Keenan System (Jaschek et al. 1964); the MK Classification Extension (Kennedy 1996); the Fifth Fundamental Catalogue (FK5) Part I (Fricke et al. 1988) and Part II (Fricke et al. 1991); and the Catalogue of Positions and Proper Motions (PPM), North (Roeser & Bastian 1988) and South (Bastian & Roser 1993)), using the VizieR astronomical database1. We selected stars whose luminosity classes were labeled as "V" (dwarf) from the catalogue to remove giant stars from the sample, since we focus our search for debris disks around main- sequence stars. Since young and massive main-sequence stars, which are commonly known as classical Be stars, sometimes exhibit significant IR excess resulting from free-free emission from circumstellar gas disks, stars whose spectral types were la- belled as "O" or "B" in the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue were excluded from our sample. The selection of A-M dwarfs from the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue left 64209 stars as an input catalogue for further investigation. Since the V-band limiting magnitude in the Tycho-2 Catalogue is about V = 11.5 (Hog et al. 2000), the distance limit for A0, F0, G0, K0, and M0 dwarfs probed by the Tycho-2 Catalogue is estimated as 1500, 1 URL: http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR/. 2 580, 260, 130, and 35 pc, respectively, by assuming no extinction at the V-band. The spatial distributions of the A-M dwarf stars from the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue in equatorial coordinates are shown in Figure 1. Since the information on luminosity classes in the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue has been adopted mainly from the Michigan Catalogue, which was based on the observa- tions taken at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory with the Michigan Curtis Schmidt telescope, the spatial distribution of the A-M dwarf stars used in this study is unevenly distributed in the southern hemisphere. 2.2. AKARI/IRCPointSourceCatalogue In the AKARI All-Sky Survey, the IRC was operated in the scan mode with a scan speed of 215′′ s−1 and the data sampling time of 0.044 s, which provided a spatial sampling of ∼ 9.′′4 along the scan direction. The pixel scale along the cross-scan direction was ∼ 9.′′4 by binning 4 pixels in a row to reduce the data downlink rate (Ishihara et al. 2010). The positional accuracy is improved to ∼ 5′′ in both bands by combining the dithered data from multi- ple observations using the standard AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey pipeline software (Ishihara et al. 2010). The 5 σ sensitivity for a point source per scan is estimated to be 50 mJy in the S9W band and 90 mJy in the L18W band. The distance limit at which the stellar photosphere can be detected in the L18W band of the AKARI/IRC Point Source Catalogue (PSC) is estimated as 74, 40, 26, 17, and 10 pc for A0, F0, G0, K0, and M0 dwarfs, re- spectively. The first version of the AKARI/IRC PSC contains more than 850000 sources detected at 9 µm and 195000 sources at 18 µm. The quoted flux density and its uncertainty for a single source were calculated as average and deviation (root-mean-square) of photometry of multiple detections. Details of the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey and its data reduction process are described in Ishihara et al. (2010). 2.3. Cross-correlation The selected dwarfs from the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue were cross-correlated against the AKARI/IRC PSC positions. A search radius of 5′′ was adopted to take account of the posi- tional uncertainty in the AKARI/IRC PSC. After the results of the cross-correlation, 873 stars out of the input 64209 stars were de- tected at 18 µm. For the detected stars, we searched for the near- est near-infrared (NIR) counterparts within a search radius of 5′′ in the 2MASS All-Sky Catalogue of Point Sources (Cutri et al. 2003) and found 856 stars with 2MASS counterparts. The num- bers of stars that were detected with both of AKARI/IRC 18 µm and 2MASS are summarised in Table 1. 2.4. 18 µm ExcessCandidateSelection We made a histogram of the KS−[18] colours of the stars de- tected at 18 µm for each spectral type and set the KS−[18] colours as an indicator of 18 µm excess. The histograms of the KS−[18] colour are shown in Figure 2 for each spectral type. Gaussian fitting was performed for the distribution of the KS−[18] colour to determine the thresholds for 18 µm ex- cess detection. The peak position µKS −[L18W] and profile width σKS −[L18W] of the KS−[18] colour in each of the spectral types derived by Gaussian fitting are listed in Table 2. The peak posi- tion (µKS −[L18W]) corresponds to the empirical KS−[18] colours Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks Table 1. Summary of debris disk survey at 18 µm. Spectral Type Input Sources 18 µm-Detected Sources Excess Sources Debris Candidates A F G K M Total 18232 29766 14013 2122 76 64209 196 324 173 144 19 856 21 12 3 2 4 42 11 10 2 1 0 24 Apparent Frequency (%) 5.6 ± 1.6 3.1 ± 1.0 1.2 ± 0.8 0.7 ± 0.7 0.0 2.8 ± 0.6 18 µm Sources Debris Candidates Debris Disk w/ Detectable Frequency Photoshpere w/ Detectable Photoshpere (%) 178 311 169 144 19 830 4 3 2 0 0 9 2.1 ± 1.1 1.0 ± 0.6 1.2 ± 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 ± 0.4 of normal stars. The scatter in the KS−[18] colours (σKS−[L18W]) are between 0.14 and 0.19 mag. This scatter can be accounted for by the photometric uncertainties in AKARI/IRC and 2MASS. For faint stars with KS & 4 mag, the scatter is dominated by the uncertainty in the AKARI/IRC L18W band photometry, which is mainly by the background noise (< 0.2 mag), while the uncer- tainty in the 2MASS KS-band photometry is smaller than 0.02 mag and does not contribute significantly. For bright stars with KS . 4 mag, the uncertainty in the AKARI/IRC L18W band photometry is small (. 0.05 mag) and the scatter is dominated by the uncertainty in the 2MASS KS-band photometry, which is ∼ 0.1 − 0.2 mag, since those stars are in the range of partial saturation in the 2MASS observations (Cutri et al. 2003). We set a 2σ-threshold for a positive 18 µm excess de- tection for each spectral type as defined in Table 2. Sources whose KS−[18] colour is larger than the 2σ-thresholds are se- lected as 18 µm excess candidates. In the selection of the 18 µm excess candidates, the photometric uncertainties of the individual stars are also taken into account. A visual inspec- tion of the excess candidates was conducted by comparing AKARI/IRC images with 2MASS and DSS images to con- firm that there were no nearby IR sources. During visual in- spection, HD 68256 and HD 68257, whose separation is 6′′, HD 24071 and HD 24072, whose separation is 4′′, HD 94602 and HD 94601, whose separation is 7′′, and HD 72945 and HD 72946, whose separation is 10′′, and HD 147722 and HD 147723, whose separation is 2′′, were found to be unre- solved in the AKARI/IRC All-Sky image and could be contam- inated by each other. Thus they were excluded from considera- tion as 18 µm excess candidates. BD+213825 is also found to be contaminated by 2MASS J19334644+2130586, whose separa- tion is 7′′, and thus excluded. It should be noted that the contam- inating star 2MASS J19334644+2130586 has a significant MIR excess, which was confirmed by our follow-up observations us- ing Subaru/COMICS and Spitzer/IRS. The rejected sources due to the nearby star contamination are listed in Table 3. Although HD 89125 and HD 15407 might be contaminated by the nearby star GJ 387 (separation is 7′′) and HIP 11962 (separation is 20′′), respectively, the observed excess flux densities at 18 µm are much larger that the expected flux densities of the contaminating sources. We conclude that the 18 µm excesses of HD 89125 and HD 15407 are secure, and we select a final catalogue of 42 stars with 18 µm excess in the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue. The 9 µm flux densities of HD 166191, HD 39415, and HD 145263, which were selected from the KS−[18] colours, are not available in the latest version of AKARI/IRC PSC since they were observed by AKARI at 9 µm during a South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) passage, and thus rejected from the PSC. However the reliable detections are confirmed in the 9 µm im- ages. We measured the 9 µm flux densities in the images man- ually. Mouri et al. (2011) investigated the behavior of signals Table 2. Obtained Parameters from Gaussian Fit. SpT A F G K M µKS −[L18W] (mag) 0.187 0.160 0.158 0.212 0.341 σKS −[L18W] (mag) 0.142 0.174 0.192 0.149 0.179 Threshold(2σ)a (mag) 0.470 0.545 0.542 0.511 0.700 a Threshold(2σ) = µKS −[L18W] + 2σKS −[L18W]. Table 3. List of Rejected Sources. Name HD 24071 HD 94602 HD 68256 HD 68257 HD 72945 HD 147722 BD+213825 IRC ID 0348356-373717 1055371+244457 0812129+173850 0812129+173850 0835509+063714 1624398-294215 1933467+213057 Contamination Source HD 24072 HD 94601 HD 68257 HD 68256 HD 72946 HD 147723 2MASS J19334644+2130586a a 2MASS J19334644+2130586 shows IR excess. from the MIR detector onboard AKARI in the SAA regions. They found that ionising particle hits affected the detector, leading to changes in the output offset. Therefore the SAA does not signif- icantly affect measurements of point sources in the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey data, and therefore the measured flux densities at 9 µm of HD 166191, HD 39415, and HD 145263 are reliable. 2.5. KnownYSOsandlate-typestars Since we focus on debris disks in this paper, we need to dis- tinguish debris disks from other types of excess emission such as those often seen in young stellar objects (YSOs) or late-type stars. We searched for the attributes of the 42 stars exhibiting 18 µm excess in the SIMBAD database2 and find that 12 and 6 stars were classified as YSOs and late-type stars in the liter- ature, respectively. The known YSOs and late-type stars in the 18 µm excess sample are listed in Table 4. The spectral type and luminosity classes in Table 4 were taken from the SIMBAD database, which is supposed to contain the latest information. For stars whose stellar information was revised after the Tycho- 2 Spectral Type Catalogue, the spectral type and luminosity class listed in Table 4 may differ from those in the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue. Thus stars other than luminosity class V have been included. 24 main-sequence stars remain as candidates for debris disks after excluding the known YSOs and late-type stars. 2 URL: http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/. 3 Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks r e b m u N 25 20 15 10 5 0 A stars -1 0 1 3 2 4 Ks-[L18W] 5 6 7 r e b m u N 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 F stars -1 0 1 3 2 4 Ks-[L18W] 5 6 7 r e b m u N 25 20 15 10 5 0 G stars -1 0 1 3 2 4 Ks-[L18W] 5 6 7 M stars r e b m u N 20 15 10 5 0 K stars -1 0 1 3 2 4 Ks-[L18W] 5 6 7 r e b m u N 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ks-[L18W] Fig. 2. Histogram of the KS−[18] colour of the stars detected at 18 µm for each spectral type star. The results of Gaussian fitting of the histograms are indicated by the dashed lines. The three vertical dotted lines indicate the peak position µKS −[L18W] (middle), and 2σ positions (left and right) of the distribution of the KS−[18] colour. Table 4. List of known YSOs and late-type stars detected at 18 µm. Name IRC ID Fobs,9 (Jy) HD 2326 HD 23937 HD 37258 HD 37357 HD 38238 HD 68695 HD 100453 HD 107439 HD 120806 HD 135344 HD 139614 HD 142666 HD 144432 HD 152404 HD 155555 HD 157045 HD 158643 HD 223075 0027064-063616 0348475-070053 0536592-060916 0537471-064230 0544187+000840 0811445-440508 1133055-541928 1221125-491240 1351516-034033 1515484-370915 1540463-422953 1556400-220140 1606579-274310 1654448-365318 1717255-665704 1727235-711715 1731250-235745 2346235+032912 99.943 ± 0.725 37.028 ± 0.144 1.749 ± 0.004 1.513 ± 0.001 1.221 ± 0.004 0.722 ± 0.010 5.518 ± 0.077 4.724 ± 0.422 58.500 ± 0.627 1.727 ± 0.063 2.386 ± 0.057 5.152 ± 0.355 2.032 ± 0.025 0.816 ± 0.025 80.030 ± 0.106 -- -- 174.197 ± 4.056 Fobs,18 (Jy) 58.287 ± 0.641 13.536 ± 0.217 1.622 ± 0.046 1.671 ± 0.060 1.690 ± 0.059 1.275 ± 0.061 18.744 ± 0.248 3.556 ± 0.132 29.671 ± 0.085 3.285 ± 0.114 10.568 ± 0.118 6.578 ± 0.007 7.326 ± 0.259 2.870 ± 0.029 0.282 ± 0.027 85.198 ± 0.310 9.241 ± 0.111 44.205 ± 0.808 KS−[9] (mag) 0.86 0.47 3.92 3.44 2.69 3.35 3.08 4.07 0.97 2.06 3.32 3.48 -- 2.90 0.11 3.18 -- 0.72 KS−[18] (mag) 1.95 1.05 5.53 5.23 4.72 5.65 6.08 5.44 1.91 4.44 6.61 5.42 5.35 4.95 0.63 4.92 4.01 0.91 Spectral Type M7 M3 A2V A0e A7IIIe A0V A9Ve G4Vp M A0V A7Ve A8Ve A9/F0V F5Ve G7IV M3III A0V CII Stellar Type Ref.a O-rich AGB O-rich AGB Herbig Ae Herbig Ae Herbig Ae Herbig Ae Herbig Ae post-AGB O-rich AGB Herbig Ae Herbig Ae Herbig Ae Herbig Ae T Tauri T Tauri O-rich AGB Herbig Ae Carbon Star 8 9 2 2 3 4 2 6 8 2 1 2 2 2 7 10 1 5 a References. (1) Montesinos et al. (2009); (2) Acke et al. (2009); (3) Hern´andez et al. (2005); (4) Manoj et al. (2006); (5) Abia et al. (2009); (6) Gielen et al. (2008); (7) Schutz et al. (2009); (8) Winters et al. (2003); (9) Sloan & Price (1998); (10) Josselin et al. (1998). 2.6. PhotosphericSEDFittingandExtinctionDetermination The photospheric flux densities of the KS−[18]-selected candi- dates were estimated from the Kurucz model (Kurucz 1992) fit- ted to the 2MASS JHKS-band photometry of the stars taking account of the extinction in the NIR. We by Fitzpatrick & Massa (2009), which is a generalization of the NIR reddening adopt curve given 4 the analytic formula given by Pei (1992). For λ ≥ λ0, it has a form of E(λ − V) E(B − V) ≡ RV Aλ AV − 1! = 0.349 + 2.087RV 1 + (λ/λ0)α − RV , (1) ) e e r g e d ( C E D ) ) e e e e r r g g e e d d ( ( C C E E D D ) ) e e e e r r g g e e d d ( ( C C E E D D ) ) e e e e r r g g e e d d ( ( C C E E D D ) ) e e e e r r g g e e d d ( ( C C E E D D 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 -20 -20 -40 -40 -60 -60 -80 -80 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 -20 -20 -40 -40 -60 -60 -80 -80 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 -20 -20 -40 -40 -60 -60 -80 -80 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 -20 -20 -40 -40 -60 -60 -80 -80 0 0 50 50 100 100 150 200 150 200 RA (degree) RA (degree) 250 250 300 300 350 350 K stars (#=2122) G stars (#=14013) 0 0 50 50 100 100 200 150 150 200 RA (degree) RA (degree) 250 250 300 300 350 350 M stars (#=76) K stars (#=2122) 0 0 50 50 100 100 150 200 150 200 RA (degree) RA (degree) 250 250 300 300 350 350 Fig. 1. Spatial distributions of A-M dwarf stars from the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue (Wright et al. 2003). Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks A stars (#=18232) where λ0 = 0.507 µm. Thus, the absolute extinction Aλ/AV is given by 0 50 100 150 200 RA (degree) 250 300 350 F stars (#=29766) A stars (#=18232) 0 0 50 50 100 100 150 200 150 200 RA (degree) RA (degree) 250 250 300 300 350 350 Aλ AV = 0.349 + 2.087RV 1 + (λ/λ0)α · 1 RV . (2) The ratio of the total to selective extinction, RV ≡ A(V)/E(B−V), and α are free parameters. NIR observations show that these pa- rameters can vary from one sight line to another. In this work, we use a curve defined by α = 2.05 and RV = 3.11. These parame- ters provide a good representation of the mean curve determined by Fitzpatrick & Massa (2009) and also of the extinction data taken from the literature for the diffuse interstellar medium in the Milky Way. In our photospheric SED fitting, the scaling factor of lumi- nosity with varying distance and extinction, and the extinction AV are free parameters, while the effective temperature and the surface gravity are inferred from the spectral type. The derived photospheric flux densities at 9 and 18 µm for each star are listed in Table 5. G stars (#=14013) F stars (#=29766) 2.7. SelectedDebrisDiskCandidates The final catalogue contains 24 AKARI-identified debris disk candidates showing 18 µm excesses. Among these, we iden- tify 8 stars (HD 64145, HD 75809, HD 89125, HD 106797, HD 113457, HD 165014, HD 175726, and HD 176137) are new debris disk candidates, and the excess emission of 2 stars (HD 15407 and HD 39415), which have never been confirmed following their tentative discovery with IRAS (Oudmaijer et al. 1992), is confirmed by our AKARI survey. The SEDs of the 24 identified debris disk candidates are shown in Figure 3. We sum- marise the observed and photospheric flux densities (Fobs and F∗, respectively) and excess significance (χ ≡ (Fobs − F∗)/σ) at 9 and 18 µm of all the candidates in Table 5, where σ is the uncertainty of the excess level calculated from the errors of the AKARI/IRC PSC photometry and in the estimation of the photo- spheric emission from the 2MASS photometry for each source. 13 stars out of the 24 identified debris disk candidates also show excess at 9 µm. It should be noted that since the uncertainty in the flux density for a single source is calculated as deviation of photometry of multiple detections in the AKARI/IRC PSC, the uncertainty may possibly be too small in case the number of detections is small, such as the cases of 18 µm photometry of HD 165014 and HD 166191. The median value of the un- certainty at 18 µm in our debris disk candidates is 0.022 Jy. Therefore the 18 µm excess towards HD 165014 and HD 166191 will still be significant even if we assume the median values as the photometric uncertainties for the two stars. We list the stellar parameters (spectral type, stellar mass, lu- minosity, age, and distance) of all the candidates in Table 6. The spectral type of the stars is all taken from the SIMBAD database. For HD 3003, HD 9672, HD 15407, HD 39060, HD 89125, HD 98800, HD 106797, HD 109573, HD 110058, HD 145263, and HD 181296, we take stellar masses and luminosities from literatures. For the other stars whose stellar masses and lumi- nosities are unavailable from the literature, we estimate them from their spectral types according to Cox (2000). 5 Table 5. List of debris disk candidates with 18 µm excess. Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks Name IRC ID HD 3003 HD 9672 HD 15407 HD 39060 HD 39415 HD 64145 HD 75809 HD 89125 HD 98800 HD 105209 HD 106797 HD 109573 HD 110058 HD 113457 HD 113766 HD 121617 HD 123356 HD 145263 HD 165014 HD 166191 HD 167905 HD 175726 HD 176137 HD 181296 0032440-630153 0134378-154035 0230506+553254 0547170-510359 0554415+443007 0753297+264556 0850454-381440 1017143+230621 1122052-244639 1206526-593529 1217062-654135 1236009-395211 1239461-491156 1305023-642630 1306357-460201 1357411-470035 1407340-210437 1610551-253121 1804432-205643 1810303-233401 1818182-232819 1856371+041553 1858451+020707 1922512-542526 Fobs,9 (Jy) 0.586 ± 0.010 0.368 ± 0.008 0.960 ± 0.031 3.216 ± 0.009 0.244 ± 0.017 0.762 ± 0.005 0.397 ± 0.012 0.975 ± 0.003 1.083 ± 0.028 0.392 ± 0.006 0.266 ± 0.017 0.360 ± 0.025 0.065 ± 0.016 0.146 ± 0.010 1.308 ± 0.065 0.103 ± 0.008 1.392 ± 0.046 0.236 ± 0.017 1.362 ± 0.043 1.816 ± 0.127 2.364 ± 0.007 0.433 ± 0.005 5.870 ± 1.112 0.622 ± 0.016 F∗,9 (Jy) 0.639 0.395 0.295 2.384 0.085 0.852 0.399 0.988 0.357 0.274 0.236 0.291 0.055 0.128 0.149 0.078 1.133 0.042 0.150 0.101 0.250 0.419 1.319 0.626 χ9 -1.7 -2.5 20.9 1.6 9.2 -0.8 -0.1 -0.1 25.0 14.9 1.6 2.6 0.6 1.7 17.8 3.0 4.7 11.4 28.0 13.5 231.8 1.2 4.1 -0.1 Excess at 9 µm Fobs,18 (Jy) Yes Yes Yes Yes Marginal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.238 ± 0.016 0.199 ± 0.014 0.497 ± 0.021 4.799 ± 0.042 0.274 ± 0.015 0.303 ± 0.041 0.152 ± 0.021 0.368 ± 0.025 6.153 ± 0.325 0.236 ± 0.013 0.148 ± 0.017 1.371 ± 0.022 0.084 ± 0.006 0.107 ± 0.025 1.428 ± 0.050 0.324 ± 0.027 0.567 ± 0.033 0.486 ± 0.013 0.959 ± 0.004 2.466 ± 0.002 1.771 ± 0.078 0.215 ± 0.034 4.995 ± 0.600 0.340 ± 0.021 F∗,18 (Jy) 0.137 0.084 0.064 0.511 0.018 0.183 0.088 0.214 0.077 0.060 0.050 0.062 0.012 0.027 0.032 0.017 0.248 0.009 0.033 0.022 0.055 0.090 0.299 0.134 χ18 5.9 8.2 20.6 35.1 17.1 2.5 3.0 3.1 18.7 13.5 5.7 59.4 12.0 3.2 27.9 11.4 9.5 36.7 224.1 1133.5 22.0 3.7 7.8 9.3 Excess at 18 µm Marginal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3. Additional Photometric Measurements of Debris Disk Candidates 3.1. Subaru/COMICSandGemini/T-ReCSFollow-up Observations HD 15407, HD 165014, and HD 175726 were observed with the COoled Mid-Infrared Camera and Spectrometer (COMICS; Kataza et al. 2000; Okamoto et al. 2003; Sako et al. 2003) mounted on the 8 m Subaru Telescope during 2007 June and July. Imaging observations at the 8.8 µm (∆λ = 0.8 µm), 9.7 µm (∆λ = 0.9 µm), 10.5 µm (∆λ = 1.0 µm), 11.7 µm (∆λ = 1.0 µm), 12.4 µm (∆λ = 1.2 µm), and 18.8 µm (∆λ = 0.9 µm) bands were carried out. The pixel scale was 0.′′13 pixel−1. To cancel out the background radiation, a secondary mirror chopping method was used. We used standard stars from Cohen et al. (1999) as a flux calibrator, and determined the reference point-spread functions (PSFs) from the observations. We observed standard stars before or after the observations of the target star in the same manner as the target stars. The parameters of the COMICS observations are summarised in Table A.1. HD 106797, HD 105209, and HD 110058 were ob- served with the Thermal-Region Camera Spectrograph (T- ReCS; Telesco et al. 1998), mounted on the 8 m Gemini South Telescope during 2007 June and July. Imaging observations at the 8.8 µm (∆λ = 0.8 µm; Si2), 9.7 µm (∆λ = 0.9 µm; Si3), 10.4 µm (∆λ = 1.0 µm; Si4), 11.7 µm (∆λ = 1.1 µm; Si5), 12.3 µm (∆λ = 1.2 µm; Si6), and 18.3 µm (∆λ = 1.5 µm; Qa) bands were carried out. The pixel scale was 0.′′09 pixel−1. Procedures for the observations were basically the same as for the COMICS observations. The parameters of the T-ReCS ob- servations are summarised in Table A.2. For the data reduction, we used our own reduction tools and IRAF3. The standard chop-nod pair subtraction and the shift- and-add method in units of 0.1 pixel were employed. We ap- plied an air mass correction by estimating the difference be- tween the target and standard stars in atmospheric absorption using ATRAN (Lord 1992). The difference in the air masses be- tween the target and standard stars was small (. 0.1) in general and the correction factor in each band was less than 5 %. The derived flux densities are summarised in Tables 7 and 8 for the COMICS and T-ReCS targets, respectively. All of them are in good agreement with the flux densities of the AKARI ob- servations taking account of the narrow band widths of filters of the ground-based observations and possible dust features in these spectral ranges (Fujiwara et al. 2009, 2010, 2012b). 3.2. IRAS,MSX,Spitzer and WISE Photometry We searched for counterparts whose positional offsets were smaller than 1′ in IRAS (Beichman et al. 1988) Point Source Catalogue (PSC) and Faint Source Catalogue (FSC), and MSX6C Infrared Point Source Catalogue (Egan et al. 2003) of the Midcourse Space Experiment (MSX; Price et al. 2001) via VizieR for each debris disk candidate. The results are shown in Tables 9 and 10 for IRAS and MSX, respectively. We also searched for Spitzer/MIPS data from published literatures and found those of HD 3003 (Smith et al. 2006) and HD 181269 (Su et al. 2006; Rebull et al. 2008), as shown in Table 11. Recent all-sky observations in the MIR by Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) have provided the All- Sky Source Catalogue (Cutri et al. 2012), which is similar to AKARI/IRC PSC and is worth comparing. We searched for coun- terparts of our MIR excess stars whose positional offsets were smaller than 5′′ in the WISE All-Sky Source Catalogue for com- parison. The results are shown in Table 12. All of our debris 3 IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. 6 Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks 100 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 10 1 0.1 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 100 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 10 1 0.1 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 0.01 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.001 1 100 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 10 1 0.1 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 HD3003 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=185K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD39415 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=321K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD98800 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=190K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD110058 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=104K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD123356 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=365K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD167905 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=467K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 100 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 10 1 0.1 0.01 1 100 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 10 1 0.1 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 HD9672 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T= 73K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD64145 HD64145 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=170K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD105209 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=332K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD113457 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=170K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD145263 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=272K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD175726 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=170K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 100 HD15407 HD39060 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 10 1 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=553K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD75809 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=170K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD106797 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=170K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD113766 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=369K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD165014 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=488K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD176137 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=401K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 0.1 1 100 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 10 1 0.1 0.01 1 100 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 10 1 0.1 0.01 1 10 1 0.1 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 0.01 1 100 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 10 1 0.1 0.01 1 100 ) y J ( y i t i s n e D x u F l 10 1 0.1 0.01 1 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=106K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD89125 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=170K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD109573 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=158K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD121617 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=173K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD166191 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=340K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 HD181296 Kurucz Mmodel Inner Disk (T=123K) Kurucz + Inner Disk 10 Wavelength (micron) 100 Fig. 3. NIR -- FIR SED of our debris disk candidates with 18 µm excess. The pluses, filled squares, open circles, crosses, open diamonds, open triangles, and filled circles indicate the photometry with the 2MASS, AKARI/IRC, IRAS, MSX, WISE, ground-based observations (Subaru/COMICS and Gemini/T-ReCS), and Spitzer/MIPS, repectively. We also plot contributions of the photosphere (dashed lines) and those of inner disk component (dotted lines) fitted with AKARI/IRC, IRAS, and Spitzer/MIPS measurements by assuming that the debris dust emits blackbody emission. Table 8. Summary of Gemini/T-ReCS photometry. Object HD 105209 HD 106797 HD 110058 Si2 8.8 (mJy) 271 ± 27 201 ± 20 -- Si3 9.7 (mJy) 280 ± 28 165 ± 17 -- Si4 10.4 (mJy) 292 ± 29 159 ± 15 -- Si5 11.7 (mJy) 331 ± 33 180 ± 14 39 ± 4 Si6 12.3 (mJy) 299 ± 30 160 ± 13 -- Qa 18.8 (mJy) 238 ± 31 119 ± 59 -- 7 Table 9. IRAS photometry of the debris disk candidates with 18 µm excess. Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks Name HD 3003 HD 9672 HD 15407 HD 15407 HD 39060 HD 39415 HD 64145 HD 75809 HD 89125 HD 98800 HD 105209 HD 109573 HD 110058 HD 113766 HD 121617 HD 123356 HD 145263 HD 166191 HD 167905 HD 176137 HD 181296 IRAS12 (Jy) IRAS25 (Jy) 0.48 ± 0.06 0.33 ± 0.03 1.05 ± 0.06 1.05 ± 0.06 3.46 ± 0.21 0.30 ± 0.03 0.72 ± 0.07 0.35 ± 0.10 0.78 ± 0.10 1.98 ± 0.14 0.49 ± 0.04 < 0.43 < 0.38 1.59 ± 0.08 < 0.25 1.36 ± 0.10 0.43 ± 0.07 2.35 ± 0.75 4.14 ± 0.25 4.91 ± 0.79 0.54 ± 0.08 0.32 ± 0.04 4.06 ± 0.07 0.43 ± 0.04 0.43 ± 0.04 9.05 ± 0.45 0.27 ± 0.09 < 0.64 < 0.25 < 0.25 9.28 ± 0.74 0.37 ± 0.40 3.38 ± 0.30 0.22 ± 0.05 1.76 ± 0.12 0.72 ± 0.09 0.61 ± 0.07 0.52 ± 0.08 3.80 ± 0.57 2.67 ± 0.27 4.01 ± 0.76 0.48 ± 0.04 IRAS60 (Jy) < 0.40 IRAS100 (Jy) < 1.00 2.00 ± 0.20 1.91 ± 0.19 19.9 ± 1.4 11.3 ± 0.90 7.28 ± 0.80 4.46 ± 0.54 < 25.0 3.81 ± 0.42 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.41 < 0.40 < 1.78 7.36 ± 0.96 0.45 ± 0.06 0.66 ± 0.05 1.95 ± 0.18 7.18 ± 1.29 < 0.40 < 1.62 < 2.76 < 11.6 0.53 ± 0.04 < 1.14 < 1.14 < 1.23 < 1.03 < 5.28 < 1.00 < 1.04 < 1.00 < 1.45 < 1.00 < 3.49 < 208 < 59.2 < 127 < 1.00 IRAS ID Catalogue 00304-6318 01321-1555 02272+5519 02272+5519 05460-5104 05510+4429 07504+2653 08488-3803 10144+2321 11195-2430 12043-5919 12333-3935 12369-4855 13037-4545 13545-4645 14047-2050 16078-2523 18074-2334 18152-2329 18562+0202 19188-5431 PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC PSC FSC PSC PSC PSC PSC Table 10. MSX photometry of the debris disk candidates with 18 µm excess. Band C (12.13 µm) Band D (14.65 µm) Name HD 105209 HD 106797 HD 113457 HD 165014 HD 166191 HD 167905 HD 175726 HD 176137 Band A (8.28 µm) (Jy) 0.347 ± 0.018 0.272 ± 0.013 0.140 ± 0.010 1.077 ± 0.045 2.028 ± 0.081 2.772 ± 0.114 0.439 ± 0.020 5.497 ± 0.236 (Jy) < 0.952 < 0.449 < 0.601 0.783 ± 0.074 1.863 ± 0.117 2.912 ± 0.163 < 0.573 6.102 ± 0.305 (Jy) < 0.728 < 0.354 < 0.466 0.764 ± 0.065 1.953 ± 0.129 2.279 ± 0.148 < 0.450 4.517 ± 0.276 Band E (21.3 µm) (Jy) MSX ID < 2.082 < 1.039 < 1.349 -- 3.166 ± 0.212 1.487 ± 0.126 < 1.262 3.601 ± 0.230 G297.3128+02.7932 G299.4048-03.0570 G304.3984-01.6086 G009.0807+00.3009 G007.4400-02.1430 G008.3752-03.6697 G037.3180+00.7938 G035.6512-00.6602 disk candidates with 18 µm excesses have a counterpart in the the WISE All-Sky Source Catalog. 4. Results and Discussion 4.1. DebrisDiskFrequency The derived apparent debris disk frequency (the fraction of the debris disk candidates in those stars detected at 18 µm in the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey) in our sample is summarised in Table 1. We find an overall apparent debris disk frequency of 2.8 ± 0.6% (24/856). The apparent debris disk frequency for A, F, G, K, and M stars is estimated to be 5.6 ± 1.6% (11/196), 3.1 ± 1.0% (10/324), 1.2 ± 0.8% (2/173), 0.7 ± 0.7% (1/144), 0.0% (0/19), respectively. Since it is limited by the sensitivity of the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey, the sample is biased towards stars exhibiting MIR excess. To estimate the debris fraction properly, we count only the excess sample whose photosphere would be detectable at 18 µm with the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey (i.e. F∗,18 & 90 mJy; HD 3003, HD 39060, HD 64145, HD 75809, HD 89125, HD 123356, HD 175726, HD 176137, and HD 181296) among 18 µm-detected sources with detectable photosphere, and calculate the "real" debris disk frequency rela- tive to those with F∗,18 & 90 mJy. We find an overall debris disk frequency of 1.1±0.4% (9/856). The debris disk frequency for A, F, G, K, and M stars is derived as 2.2 ± 1.1% (4/178), 1.0 ± 0.6% (3/311), 1.2 ± 0.8% (2/169), 0.0% (0/144), 0.0% (0/19), respec- tively, suggesting a possible tendency of an increase in the debris disk frequency towards earlier type stars. The statistics of the de- bris disk frequency is summarises in Table 1. The excess rates at 24 µm by Spitzer/MIPS observa- tions for A stars and solar-type FGK stars are 32% (52/160) (Su et al. 2006) and 6% (5/82) (Beichman et al. 2006), respec- tively. Therefore the debris disk frequency derived in this work is much smaller than those estimated by Spitzer/MIPS obser- vations both for A and FGK stars. It should be noted that the uncertainty in Spitzer/MIPS pointed observations is smaller than the present catalogue of the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey and thus Spitzer/MIPS observations detect fainter excess than this work. Our thresholds for 18 µm excess detection for the AKARI/IRC sample in this study are shown in Table 2, which can potentially detect a debris disk star with 18 µm excess of Fobs,18/F∗,18 & 1.4. If we take a debris disk sample with 24 µm excess from the Spitzer/MIPS sample with the same threshold (Fobs,24/F∗,24 & 1.4) as set for the AKARI/IRC sample in this work, the frequency becomes 14% (22/160) and 1% (1/82) for A and FGK stars, respectively. The debris disk frequency of FGK stars in this work is derived as 0.8 ± 0.3% (5/624), being consis- tent with the Spitzer/MIPS work (Beichman et al. 2006). On the other hand, the frequency of A stars in this work is still smaller than that of the Spitzer/MIPS work (Su et al. 2006) even after considering the difference in the excess detection threshold. The difference might come from a selection effect of the input stars; 8 Table 12. WISE photometry of the debris disk candidates with 18 µm excess. Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks Name HD 3003 HD 9672 HD 15407 HD 39060 HD 39415 HD 64145 HD 75809 HD 89125 HD 98800 HD 105209 HD 106797 HD 109573 HD 110058 HD 113457 HD 113766 HD 121617 HD 123356 HD 145263 HD 165014 HD 166191 HD 167905 HD 175726 HD 176137 HD 181296 W1 (3.4 µm) (Jy) 3.066 ± 0.198 2.026 ± 0.115 1.721 ± 0.093 10.603 ± 1.023 0.463 ± 0.013 4.182 ± 0.328 1.819 ± 0.096 5.611 ± 0.429 1.976 ± 0.116 1.086 ± 0.051 1.217 ± 0.048 2.028 ± 0.119 0.298 ± 0.007 0.697 ± 0.021 0.896 ± 0.039 0.435 ± 0.013 4.624 ± 0.358 0.241 ± 0.005 1.010 ± 0.036 0.787 ± 0.026 1.938 ± 0.086 2.467 ± 0.176 3.055 ± 0.203 3.184 ± 0.209 W2 (4.6 µm) (Jy) 2.356 ± 0.084 1.311 ± 0.033 1.376 ± 0.040 10.808 ± 0.406 0.279 ± 0.005 3.010 ± 0.113 0.966 ± 0.023 4.530 ± 0.235 1.273 ± 0.038 0.715 ± 0.016 0.731 ± 0.014 1.143 ± 0.029 0.162 ± 0.003 0.384 ± 0.008 0.660 ± 0.015 0.239 ± 0.004 3.747 ± 0.169 0.153 ± 0.003 1.083 ± 0.026 0.879 ± 0.020 3.100 ± 0.125 1.593 ± 0.055 4.868 ± 0.239 2.369 ± 0.078 W3 (12 µm) (Jy) 0.363 ± 0.005 0.232 ± 0.003 0.699 ± 0.010 2.698 ± 0.017 0.220 ± 0.003 0.416 ± 0.006 0.249 ± 0.003 0.522 ± 0.007 1.807 ± 0.020 0.301 ± 0.004 0.159 ± 0.002 0.278 ± 0.004 0.047 ± 0.001 0.104 ± 0.002 1.265 ± 0.011 0.076 ± 0.001 0.932 ± 0.012 0.292 ± 0.004 0.851 ± 0.011 2.157 ± 0.028 2.052 ± 0.025 0.236 ± 0.003 3.369 ± 0.044 0.405 ± 0.006 W4 (22 µm) (Jy) 0.258 ± 0.005 0.268 ± 0.006 0.404 ± 0.009 7.972 ± 0.081 0.279 ± 0.006 0.128 ± 0.004 0.112 ± 0.003 0.139 ± 0.003 6.995 ± 0.065 0.212 ± 0.004 0.162 ± 0.003 2.714 ± 0.035 0.228 ± 0.005 0.099 ± 0.003 1.672 ± 0.015 0.588 ± 0.010 0.497 ± 0.009 0.468 ± 0.009 0.703 ± 0.012 3.271 ± 0.046 1.516 ± 0.027 0.106 ± 0.006 2.691 ± 0.050 0.418 ± 0.007 WISE ID J003244.02-630154.0 J013437.83-154034.8 J023050.75+553253.3 J054717.01-510357.5 J055441.52+443007.5 J075329.80+264556.5 J085045.44-381439.9 J101714.20+230621.6 J112205.23-244639.4 J120652.71-593529.7 J121706.26-654134.7 J123600.95-395210.8 J123946.17-491155.6 J130501.99-642629.8 J130635.77-460202.0 J135741.10-470034.4 J140734.01-210437.5 J161055.09-253121.9 J180443.14-205644.6 J181030.32-233400.6 J181818.22-232819.7 J185637.17+041553.6 J185845.10+020706.9 J192251.21-542527.0 we select only dwarf A stars from the Tycho-2 Spectral Type Catalogue, while the Su et al. (2006) sample includes a number of very young star (age<10 Myr) and late B stars, which show excess more frequently. The frequency of debris disks around M stars in this work is derived as 0.0% (0/19). Although the only known M-type debris disk AU Mic is detected with IRC with 1.08 ± 0.01 and 0.25 ± 0.02 Jy at 9 and 18 µm, respectively, no MIR excess is found towards the star. The non-detection of excess at 9 and 18 µm around AU Mic is consistent with MIR observations with Spitzer (e.g. Chen et al. 2005). 4.2. CharacteristicsofSelectedDebrisDiskCandidates 4.2.1. MIR colour, Inner Temperature, and Inner Radius Estimate of the dust temperature is important to infer the radial structures of debris disks. MIR observations are particularly use- ful to trace the temperature of the inner hottest region of de- bris disks. We derived the dust temperature from the 9 to 18 µm colours of the observed excess emission for each star by assum- ing that the debris dust emits blackbody emission. This temper- ature is supposed to correspond to the dust temperature (Tin) at the inner radius (Rin) of the debris disk. In the case where excess emission at 9 µm was not detected with AKARI/IRC, the dust temperature should be lower than the temperature for those which show excess at 9 µm. For the sources whose 9 µm excess was not detected with AKARI/IRC and excess at the wavelengths of λ & 24 µm was reported by IRAS or Spitzer observations, we derived the dust tempera- ture from blackbody fitting to the observed excess emission at λ & 24 µm. In the case that excesses at 9 µm and at & 24 µm were not detected with AKARI/IRC, IRAS, and Spitzer, we set an upper limit of Tin at 170 K, which is the highest possible tem- perature of the coldest debris disk with 9 and 18 µm excess in the sample (Tin = 158+11 −13 for HD 109573). We also derived the inner radius of debris disk (Rin) as Rin = r L∗ 16πσSB T −2 in , (3) where L∗ and σSB is the stellar luminosity and the Stefan- Boltzmann constant, respectively. The derived MIR colour, Tin, and Rin are listed in Table 13. The inner temperature Tin and inner radius Rin of A stars range from . 100 K to ∼ 330 K and from ∼ 5 AU to > 20 AU, respectively. The median value of the inner temperature among A stars is . 170 K. On the other hand, Tin and Rin of solar-type FGK stars ranges from . 170 K to ∼ 500 K and from < 1 AU to & 5 AU, respectively. The median value of the inner temperature among FGK stars is ∼ 350 K, much higher than that of A stars. This suggests that the origin of the observed MIR excess is dif- ferent between A and FGK stars: while the MIR excess emission of A stars in our sample is typically contributed from the Wien- side tail of the emission from the cool debris material, that of FGK stars originates in the emission from the inner warm debris material. 4.2.2. Lack of Cooler Material in Outer Region The flux contributed from the inner dust for each star is shown in Figure 3. The excess component of our samples except for HD 109573, HD 121617, and HD 166191 can be fitted fairly well only with the inner dust component of a single black- body. This implies the lack of cooler material in the outer re- gion around those stars and truncation of the disk at inner radii, although FIR and sub-mm observations with high sensitivity are required to accurately investigate the presence of the outer mate- rial. Only one object (HD 166191) shows a rising SED towards 60 µm among our 13 FGK-type samples, while about half of the samples of 11 A-type stars show FIR excess, suggesting that solar-type stars in our sample tend to have less cooler material in the outer region than A stars. 9 Table 13. Inner temperature and radius of debris disk candidates with 18 µm excess. Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks Ldust/L∗ Cooler Material Yes Yes Yes L−0.5 ∗ t−1 age (4) fmax = 0.16 × 10−3 R7/3 dust M−5/6 ∗ for the fixed model parameters (belt width: dr/r = 0.5; plan- etesimal strength: Q∗ D = 200 J/kg; planetesimal eccentricity: e = 0.05; and diameter of the largest planetesimal in cascade: Dc = 2000 km). The values of fmax were calculated using the parameters of the central star listed in Table 6 and the estimated parameters for the inner disk component in Table 13. The ratios of the observed fractional luminosities to the the- oretical maximum fractional luminosities ( fobs/ fmax) are sum- marised in Table 14. Some debris disks show fractional lumi- nosities of fobs/ fmax ≫ 100, suggesting that these debris disks cannot be accounted for by simple models of the steady-state debris disks, and that transient events likely play a significant role, even taking account of the uncertainties in the models (Wyatt et al. 2007a). One of the transient phenomena producing a large amount of debris dust around a star is a dynamical instability that scatters planetesimals inward from a more distant planetesimal belt. Dust is released from unstable planetesimals following collisions and sublimation. This is akin to the late heavy bombardment (LHB) in the solar system, the cataclysmic event that occurred about 700 Myr after the initial formation of the solar system, as implied by Moon's cratering record (e.g. Hartmann et al. 2000). To develop a LHB-like event around a star, a newly born planet would have to migrate and stir up planetesimals. Since planet formation is expected to last for several hundred Myr around solar-type stars, LHB-like events could be the cause of dense warm debris disks around the young (age . Gyr) FGK sys- tems of HD 113766, HD 145263, and HD 98800. On the other hand, HD 89125, HD 15407, and HD 175726 are older than one Gyr and planet formation is expected to have already been finished. Therefore another dust production mechanism would be required to account for the large fractional luminosities of Tin (K) 185+21 −21 73+4 −4 553+34 −31 106+5 −5 321+17 −17 (< 170) (< 170) (< 170) 190+3 −3 332+13 −13 (< 170) 158+11 −13 104+1 −1 (< 170) 369+13 −13 173+12 −14 365+38 −38 272+8 −9 488+12 −13 340+11 −12 467+15 −15 (< 170) 401+67 −61 123+5 −5 Rin (AU) 10.4+2.8 −2.0 69.5+8.3 −7.0 0.5+0.1 −0.1 20.4+2.1 −1.8 1.6+0.2 −0.2 (> 16.9) (> 5.6) (> 4.0) 1.8+0.1 −0.1 5.8+0.5 −0.4 (> 17.5) 15.3+2.9 −1.9 22.7+0.4 −0.4 (> 22.2) 1.2+0.1 −0.1 21.5+3.9 −2.7 0.7+0.2 −0.1 2.1+0.1 −0.1 0.9+0.0 −0.0 1.4+0.1 −0.1 0.7+0.0 −0.0 (> 2.9) 1.0+0.4 −0.3 24.1+2.1 −1.8 written by 7 × 10−5 7 × 10−4 6 × 10−3 2 × 10−3 6 × 10−3 (> 9 × 10−5) (> 2 × 10−4) (> 3 × 10−4) 8 × 10−2 4 × 10−4 (> 2 × 10−4) 2 × 10−3 2 × 10−3 (> 3 × 10−4) 2 × 10−2 2 × 10−3 8 × 10−4 1 × 10−2 2 × 10−2 5 × 10−2 2 × 10−2 (> 6 × 10−4) 9 × 10−3 2 × 10−4 Name HD 3003 HD 9672 HD 15407 HD 39060 HD 39415 HD 64145 HD 75809 HD 89125 HD 98800 HD 105209 HD 106797 HD 109573 HD 110058 HD 113457 HD 113766 HD 121617 HD 123356 HD 145263 HD 165014 HD 166191 HD 167905 HD 175726 HD 176137 HD 181296 Fexc,9 (Jy) -- -- 0.665 -- 0.159 -- -- -- 0.726 0.118 -- 0.069 -- -- 1.160 0.025 0.258 0.194 1.212 1.715 2.114 -- 4.552 -- Fexc,18 (Jy) 0.101 0.115 0.434 4.288 0.256 0.120 0.064 0.154 6.076 0.177 0.097 1.309 0.072 0.080 1.396 0.308 0.319 0.477 0.927 2.445 1.717 0.125 4.696 0.206 Fexc,9/Fexc,18 -- -- 1.53 ± 0.10 -- 0.62 ± 0.08 -- -- -- 0.12 ± 0.01 0.67 ± 0.06 -- 0.05 ± 0.02 -- -- 0.83 ± 0.06 0.08 ± 0.03 0.81 ± 0.17 0.41 ± 0.04 1.31 ± 0.05 0.70 ± 0.05 1.23 ± 0.06 -- 0.97 ± 0.27 -- Rhee et al. (2007) suggest that the dust temperature in typi- cal debris disks discovered with IRAS observations is less than 100 K and the peak of the excess flux density comes to around 60 − 100 µm. However, most of the debris disks detected by AKARI/IRC in this work have abundant warm dust, while cooler material in the outer regions is not conspicuous, suggesting that we detect a sub-group of the debris disks, in which warm dust grains are more abundant than in debris disks detected by IRAS. Special mechanisms, such as dust trapping by the resonance per- turbation of planets or generation of a large amount of warm dust, might play significant roles in the inner region of disk in these systems. 4.2.3. Fractional Luminosity of Inner Disk Estimating the amount of dust is important to characterise the debris disk. One of the observable indicators of the dust abun- dance is its fractional luminosity, f = Ldust/L∗, i.e., the IR lumi- nosity from the disk divided by the stellar luminosity. We derive the fractional luminosities ( fobs) of the inner debris disk by in- tegrating the intrinsic stellar emission and the observed excess emission of the inner debris component. The derived fractional luminosities are shown in Table 13. It should be noted that the fractional luminosities for the inner disks with the cold dust com- ponent should be regarded as upper limits, since we do not take account of the contribution from the cold dust. The derived frac- tional luminosities range from ∼ 10−4 to ∼ 10−1. The fractional luminosity of our own zodiacal cloud is estimated to be of the or- der ∼ 10−7 (Backman & Paresce 1993). Thus the debris disks in our sample are typically by more than 1000 times brighter than our own zodiacal cloud. Wyatt et al. (2007a) developed a simple model for the steady-state evolution of debris disks produced by collisions and suggested that the maximum fractional luminosity ( fmax) can be 10 Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks Table 6. Stellar parameters of debris disk candidates with 18 µm excess. Name HD 3003 HD 9672 HD 15407 HD 39060 HD 39415 HD 64145 HD 75809 HD 89125 HD 98800 HD 105209 HD 106797 HD 109573 HD 110058 HD 113457 HD 113766 HD 121617 HD 123356 HD 145263 HD 165014 HD 166191 HD 167905 HD 175726 HD 176137 HD 181296 Spectral Type A0V A1V F3V A6V F5V A3V F3V F8Vbw K5V A1V A0V A0V A0V A0V F4V A1V G1V F0V F2V F4V F3V G5 F5 A0Vn M∗ (M⊙) 2.9 2.7 1.4 1.8 1.4 2.5 1.4 0.98 0.67 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 1.4 2.9 1.05 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.01 1.4 2.9 L∗ (L⊙) 21.0 22.8 3.9 8.7 4.3 39.8 4.3 2.19 0.7 68.7 42.4 24.3 10.0 68.7 4.3 68.7 1.4 4.1 7.2 4.3 4.3 1.2 4.3 22.0 Age (Myr) 50 20 80 -- 2100 12+8 −4 -- -- -- 6457 10 -- 10 -- 20 8 10 10 -- 20 10 -- 20 8 -- 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4800 ± 3500 12+8 −4 d (pc) 47 61 55 19 -- 78 -- 23 47 -- 96 67 100 95 123 120 -- 116 -- -- 53 27 -- 48 Ref.a 1 1 8,9 6 5 5 5 11 13 5 3,4 1 1 4,5 10 5 5 7 5 5 5 12 5 2 (2007b); a References. (1) Wyatt et al. (2) Zuckerman & Webb (2000); (3) Fujiwara et al. (2009); (4) de Zeeuw et al. (1999); (5) Cox (2000); (6) Crifo et al. (1997); (7) Honda et al. (2004); (8) Holmberg et al. (10) Uzpen et al. (2007); (11) Takeda (2007); (12) Bruntt (2009); (13) Wyatt et al. (2007a). (9) Melis et al. (2010); (2009); Table 7. Summary of Subaru/COMICS photometry. Object HD 15407 HD 165014 HD 175726 N8.8 (mJy) 904 ± 90 927 ± 93 -- N11.7 (mJy) 644 ± 64 894 ± 89 214 ± 20 Q18.8 (mJy) 486 ± 73 838 ± 126 -- Table 11. Spitzer/MIPS photometry of the debris disk candidates with 18 µm excess. Name HD 3003 HD 181296 MIPS24 MIPS70 MIPS160 Ref.a (mJy) 224 ± 9 382 ± 7 (mJy) 62 ± 5 409 ± 42 1 2,3 (mJy) -- 68 a References. (1) Smith et al. (2006); (2) Su et al. (2006); (3) Rebull et al. (2008). HD 89125, HD 15407, and HD 175726. It is worth noting that recent FIR observations of HD 15407 by Herschel and AKARI revealed the absence of cold dust around the star, not supporting an LHB-like event as the origin of the bright debris disk around the star (Fujiwara et al. 2012a). 4.2.4. Difference between A and FGK stars To investigate the relationship between the debris disks and the spectral type of the central stars, we plot the distributions of Tin, Table 14. Comparison of observed ( fobs) and theoretical frac- tional luminosities ( fmax) for our debris disk sample whose age is available. Name HD 3003 HD 9672 HD 15407 HD 39060 HD 89125 HD 98800 HD 106797 HD 109573 HD 110058 HD 113457 HD 113766 HD 145263 HD 175726 HD 181296 fobs 7 × 10−5 7 × 10−4 6 × 10−3 2 × 10−3 (> 3 × 10−4) 8 × 10−2 (> 2 × 10−4) 2 × 10−3 2 × 10−3 2 × 10−2 1 × 10−2 2 × 10−4 fmax 7 × 10−5 2 × 10−3 (300 -- 1) ×10−8 3 × 10−3 (> 7 × 10−7) 6 × 10−5 (> 1 × 10−3) 5 × 10−5 2 × 10−3 7 × 10−6 4 × 10−5 1 × 10−3 (> 3 × 10−4) (> 2 × 10−3) (> 6 × 10−4) (> (40 -- 1) ×10−7) fobs/ fmax 1 0.4 20000 -- 600000 0.9 (> 500) 1000 (> 0.2) 40 0.7 (> 0.2) 3000 300 (> 200 -- 6000) 0.2 Rin, fractional luminosity and fobs/ fmax sorting by the spectral types in Figure 4. It is seen that all of the debris disks inves- tigated here change their characteristics appreciably around the spectral type F0; Tin . 200 K for A stars while Tin & 300 K for FGK stars; Rin & a few AU for A stars while Rin . a few AU for FGK stars; the fractional luminosities for A stars are distributed around 10−5 − 10−3 while those for FGK stars are in a range 10−3 − 10−1, and fobs/ fmax for A stars is distributed around unity while that for FGK stars is & 100. In other words, the properties of the inner disks of A and FGK stars are different from each other. Most of our debris disk samples around FGK stars possess warm dust without an appreciable amount of cooler dust, while those debris disks with 18 µm excesses around A stars show lit- tle excess at 9 µm. Our debris disk samples around FGK stars may belong to a sub-group of the debris disks in which violent dust supply is taking place in the inner region (. a few AU) of the disk. Radiation pressure is capable of removing dust grains and changing the radial distribution of dust. When the radiation- pressure-to-gravity ratio β = Frad/Fgrav becomes larger than unity, the outward force dominates and the dust grains are blown out. The ratio β can be approximated by β = (0.4 µm/D)(2.7 g/cm3/ρ)(L∗/M∗), (5) where D is the grain size, ρ is the grain density, and L∗ and M∗ are in units of L⊙ and M⊙ (Burns et al. 1979). For µm-sized (D ∼ 1 µm) silicate (ρ ∼ 2.7 g/cm3) grains, β becomes about unity around a F0 star (M∗ = 1.6M⊙ and L∗ = 4.1L⊙). Therefore µm-sized grains may be blown out by radiation pressure in the vicinity of A stars, while they can survive in FGK stars. Morales et al. (2009) observed 52 main-sequence A and late B type stars with the Spitzer/IRS that showed excess emission at 24 µm in the Spitzer/MIPS observations. They found no promi- nent spectral features evident in any of the spectra, suggesting that fine particles that show spectral features are absent around early-type stars. By taking the estimated β value and the absence of small dust grains around early-type stars into account, it is suggested that µm-sized grains are blown out by radiation pressure from A stars and that the difference of the disk characteristics between A and FGK stars seen in our sample may be driven by the radiation pressure on grains. 11 Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks e p y T l a r t c e p S A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A1 A1 A1 A3 A6 F0 F2 F3 F3 F3 F4 F4 F5 F5 F8 G1 G6 K5 (a) HD105209 HD3003 HD181296 HD109573 HD106797 HD113457 HD110058 HD9672 HD121617 HD64145 HD39060 HD145263 HD165014 HD15407 HD167905 HD75809 HD113766 HD176137 HD166191 HD39415 HD89125 HD123356 HD175726 HD98800 e p y T l a r t c e p S A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A1 A1 A1 A3 A6 F0 F2 F3 F3 F3 F4 F4 F5 F5 F8 G1 G6 K5 (b) HD3003 HD181296 HD109573 HD106797 HD113457 HD110058 HD9672 HD105209 HD121617 HD64145 HD39060 HD145263 HD165014 HD15407 HD167905 HD75809 HD113766 HD166191 HD176137 HD39415 HD89125 HD123356 HD175726 HD98800 e p y T l a r t c e p S A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A1 A1 A1 A3 A6 F0 F2 F3 F3 F3 F4 F4 F5 F5 F8 G1 G6 K5 HD3003 HD181296 (c) HD109573 HD106797 HD113457 HD110058 HD9672 HD105209 HD121617 HD64145 HD39060 HD145263 HD165014 HD15407 HD167905 HD75809 HD113766 HD166191 HD176137 HD39415 HD89125 HD123356 HD175726 HD98800 e p y T l a r t c e p S A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A1 A6 F0 F3 F4 F8 G6 K5 HD3003 HD181296 (d) HD109573 HD106797 HD113457 HD110058 HD9672 HD39060 HD145263 HD15407 HD113766 HD89125 HD175726 HD98800 100 200 300 400 500 600 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 10-1100101102103104105106 Tin (K) Rin (AU) Fractional Luminosity fobs/fmax Fig. 4. Distributions of Tin (a), Rin (b), fractional luminosity (c) and fobs/ fmax (d). Filled and open squares indicate the stars with and without 9 µm excess, respectively. We set Tin at 170 K for the stars without 9 µm excess and photometric information at λ & 24 µm. 4.3. IndividualStar Here we present notes about the individual debris disk candi- dates with 18 µm excess discovered with AKARI or confirmed in this work for the first time after the report by Oudmaijer et al. (1992). 4.3.1. HD 15407 HD 15407 is an F3V star at d = 55 pc, whose IR excess was originally suggested by Oudmaijer et al. (1992) and confirmed with our present AKARI study. The SIMBAD database indi- cates HD 15407 is a star in double system with the nearby K2V star HIP 11692 (HD 15407B) with the apparent separation of 21.′′2. In this paper we refer the primary star (frequently called as HD 15407A) simply as HD 15407. HD 15407 star may be mature and the age is estimated as 2.1 Gyr by Holmberg et al. (2009). On the other hand, a recent paper (Melis et al. 2010) suggests a much younger age (∼ 80 Myr) based on the lithium 6710 Å absorption and the motion in the Galaxy. This star is one of the most peculiar debris disk candidates in our sample since the fractional luminosity is much larger than the steady- state evolution model of planetesimals ( fobs/ fmax > 105). In ad- dition, abundant silica (SiO2) dust, which is rare dust species in the universe, is seen in the Spitzer/IRS spectrum (Fujiwara et al. 2012b; Olofsson et al. 2012). Special mechanisms to generate a large amount of peculiar dust play a significant role around the star. 4.3.2. HD 39415 HD 39415 is an F5V star, whose IR excess was originally suggested by Oudmaijer et al. (1992) and confirmed with our present AKARI study. No age information is available at present. Holmes et al. (2003) report non-detection of sub-mm emission at 870 and 1300 µm (3σ limits are 18.75 and 10.68 mJy at 870 and 1300 µm, respectively) with the Heinrich Hertz Telescope at the Submillimeter Telescope Observatory, suggesting that the amount of cool material around the star, if any, is quite small. 4.3.3. HD 64145 HD 64145 is an A3V star at d = 78 pc, whose 18 µm excess is found in this AKARI sample. No age information is avail- able at present. This star is reported as a binary system with a secondary on a 582-day orbit (e.g. Abt 2005). Although no excess at 9 µm is detected with the AKARI/IRC measurements, the IRAS 12 µm flux density is slightly higher than the photo- spheric level. Since the inner radius of the disk is derived as Rin ∼ 17 AU and thus an apparent separation of 0.′′22 is ex- pected, an extended disk structure might be resolved spatially in the scattered light with a high contrast coronagraph with adap- tive optics on 8 -- 10-m class ground-base telescopes. It should be noted that this star is contained in the WISE All-Sky Source Catalogue (Cutri et al. 2012) as J075329.80+264556.5. The flux density at 22 µm (W4 band) is estimated as ∼ 130 mJy in the WISE All-Sky Source Catalogue and is consistent with the ex- pected photoshperic level, suggesting no significant excess at 22 µm. Photometries with narrow/intermediate filters at around 20 µm are required for examination of the inconsistency in the flux density between AKARI and WISE. 4.3.4. HD 75809 HD 75809 is an F3V star, whose 18 µm excess is found in this AKARI sample. No age information is available at present. No 9 µm excess is found with the AKARI observations, suggest- ing that the temperature of the debris disk is at the lowest end amongst our samples. 4.3.5. HD 89125 HD 89125 is a nearby F8V star at d = 23 pc, whose 18 µm ex- cess is found in this AKARI sample. This star is mature and the age is estimated as 6.5 Gyr (Takeda 2007). The fractional lumi- 12 Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks nosity of the star is much larger than the steady-state evolution model of planetesimals ( fobs/ fmax > 500), suggesting that tran- sient dust production events might play a significant role around the star. It should be noted that the star is reported as being metal poor ([Fe/H]= −0.39) and one of the most metal-poor debris sys- tems among the known sample (Beichman et al. 2006). This star is contained in the WISE All-Sky Source Catalogue (Cutri et al. 2012) as J101714.20+230621.6. The flux density at 22 µm (W4 band) is estimated as ∼ 140 mJy in the WISE All-Sky Source Catalogue and is consistent with the expected photoshperic level, suggesting no significant excess at 22 µm. Photometry with nar- row/intermediate filters at around 20 µm is required for exami- nation of the inconsistency. 4.3.6. HD 106797 HD 106797 is an A0V star at d = 99 pc, whose 18 µm excess is found in this AKARI sample. de Zeeuw et al. (1999) classified HD 106797 as a member of Lower Centaurus Crux group, whose age is estimated as 10 −20 Myr. Fujiwara et al. (2009) suggested the presence of narrow spectral features between 11 and 12 µm, which is attributable to (sub-)µm-sized crystalline silicates based on the multi-band photometric data collected in the follow-up observations with Gemini/T-ReCS. 4.3.7. HD 113457 HD 113457 is an A0V star at d = 95 pc, whose 18 µm excess is found in this AKARI sample. de Zeeuw et al. (1999) classifies HD 113457 as a member of Lower Centaurus Crux group, whose age is estimated as 10−20 Myr. Since the inner radius of the disk is estimated to be Rin ∼ 22 AU and thus an apparent separation of 0.′′23 is expected, an extended disk structure might be resolved spatially in the scattered light with a high contrast coronagraph with adaptive optics. 4.3.8. HD 165014 HD 165014 is an F2V star, whose 9 and 18 µm excesses are found in this AKARI sample. No age information is available at present. This star was also detected at 8 -- 14 µm with MSX and possible excesses at the wavelengths have been suggested by Clarke et al. (2005). Strong dust features attributable to crys- talline enstatite (MgSiO3) are seen in its Spitzer/IRS spectrum (Fujiwara et al. 2010) while crystalline forsterite (Mg2SiO4) fea- tures, which is typically more abundant around young stars, are not seen. Possible formation of enstatite dust from differentiated parent bodies is suggested according to the solar system analog. Special mechanisms to generate a large amount of crystalline enstatite dust must play a role around the star (Fujiwara et al. 2010). 4.3.9. HD 175726 HD 175726 is a nearby G6V star at d = 27 pc, whose 18 µm ex- cess is found in this AKARI sample. The stellar age is estimated as 4.8 ± 3.5 Gyr by Bruntt (2009). The fractional luminosity is larger than the steady-state evolution model of planetesimals ( fobs/ fmax > 103), suggesting that some transient dust produc- tion events play a role around the star. Since the stellar age is in a range during which LHB took place in the solar system, the bright debris disk around HD 175726 might be produced by a LHB-like phenomenon. It should be noted that this star is con- tained in the WISE All-Sky Source Catalogue (Cutri et al. 2012) as J185637.17+041553.6. Although the flux density at 22 µm (W4 band) is estimated as ∼ 110 mJy in the WISE Catalogue and suggests excess at the wavelength, it is considerably lower than the AKARI measurement at 18 µm. The discrepancy may suggest temporal variability of MIR excess towards HD 175726 over a few years. A recent study reveals a dramatic decrease in the infrared excess seen in one of the warm dust debris can- didates, the young Sun-like star TYC 8241-2652-1, in several years, which suggests removal of warm debris from the system in a very short time scale (Melis et al. 2012). Monitoring obser- vations of HD 175726 around 20 µm could reveal the nature and evolution of its debris system. The star is a CoRoT asteroseismic target and the presence of weak solar-like oscillations is reported (Mosser et al. 2009) while no hint of planets orbiting the star is so far suggested. 4.3.10. HD 176137 HD 176137 is an F5 star, whose 18 µm excess is found in this AKARI sample. No age information is available at present. This star is located in the direction towards a highly obscured re- gion in the Galaxy, whose interstellar extinction is estimated as AV = 27.1 by "Galactic Dust Reddening and Extinction" at the IRSA4. The extinction towards the star derived from our fitting procedure of photosphere is Av = 13.0, much smaller than the es- timated extinction, suggesting that the star is located near to us. HD 176137 is a double star system with a separation of 0.′′5 -- 1′′ (at the epoch of 1910-2009) as resolved by speckle interferom- etry (Douglass et al. 2000). The nature of the nearby star is not known enough. Ground-based MIR observations of the star with high spatial resolution are needed for further discussion on the possible confusion in the excess from the nearby star. 5. Summary We report the results of a systematic survey of warm (T & 150 K) debris disks based on photometric measurements at 18 µm take from the AKARI/IRC All-Sky Survey data. We have found 24 debris disk candidates with bright MIR excess emis- sion above the stellar photospheric emission out of 856 sources that were detected at 18 µm. Among them 8 stars are newly dis- covered in this work. We found that 13 stars of the 24 debris disk candidates also show excess emission at 9 µm. The over- all apparent debris disk frequency is derived as 2.8 ± 0.6% for our sample. We have identified a tendency for the frequency to increase towards earlier type stars. The temperature, radius, and fractional luminosity of the in- ner disk component of the candidates are derived from the 9 to 18 µm flux densities of the excess emission sources. We find that A stars and solar-type FGK stars have different characteris- tics of their debris disks; most of those around FGK stars pos- sess warm dust without any cool dust component, while the de- bris disks around A stars show little evidence for excess at 9 µm and appear to have lower temperature (T . 200 K) debris dust. In addition, considering only the objects for which the age in- formation is available, we find that the fractional luminosities of the inner debris disks around FGK stars cannot be explained by steady-state evolutionary models of debris disks that are sus- tained by collisions of planetesimals. On the other hand, the de- bris disks we have detected around A stars are found to fit well with the steady-state model. We propose that the debris disks 4 URL: http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/DUST/. 13 Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks around FGK stars belong to a sub-group of debris disks, in which violent dust supply and processing are taking place in the inner region (. a few AU) of the disk. The suggested difference in the debris disk characteristics between A and solar-type FGK stars can be explored by the next version of the AKARI/IRC PSC and the data from WISE, which will dramatically improve the sensi- tivity of MIR photometry and should allow us to study a larger population of these very interesting objects. Acknowledgements. This research is based on observations with the AKARI, a JAXA project with the participation of ESA and on data collected at the Subaru Telescope and the Gemini Observatory. It has made use of the SIMBAD database and the VizieR catalogue access tool, CDS, Strasbourg, France and the data products from 2MASS. H.F. and S.T. was financially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This research was supported by KAKENHI (07J02823 and 23103002). References Abia, C., de Laverny, P., Recio-Blanco, A., et al. 2009, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 26, 351 Abt, H. A. 2005, ApJ, 629, 507 Acke, B., Min, M., van den Ancker, M. E., et al. 2009, A&A, 502, L17 Aumann, H. H., Beichman, C. A., Gillett, F. C., et al. 1984, ApJ, 278, L23 Backman, D. E. & Paresce, F. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, ed. E. H. Levy & J. I. Lunine, 1253 -- 1304 Bastian, U. & Roser, S. 1993, Catalog of Positions and Proper Motions: South (Heidelberg: Astron. Rechen Inst.), ed. S. Bastian, U. & Roser Beichman, C. A., Bryden, G., Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1674 Beichman, C. A., Neugebauer, G., Habing, H. J., Clegg, P. E., & Chester, T. J., eds. 1988, Infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS) catalogs and atlases. Volume 1: Explanatory supplement, Vol. 1 Bruntt, H. 2009, A&A, 506, 235 Burns, J. A., Lamy, P. L., & Soter, S. 1979, Icarus, 40, 1 Chen, C. H., Patten, B. M., Werner, M. W., et al. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1372 Clarke, A. J., Oudmaijer, R. D., & Lumsden, S. L. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 1111 Cohen, M., Walker, R. G., Carter, B., et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 1864 Cox, A. N. 2000, Allen's astrophysical quantities, ed. A. N. Cox Crifo, F., Vidal-Madjar, A., Lallement, R., Ferlet, R., & Gerbaldi, M. 1997, A&A, 320, L29 Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources., ed. Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., Beichman, C. A., Carpenter, J. M., Chester, T., Cambresy, L., Evans, T., Fowler, J., Gizis, J., Howard, E., Huchra, J., Jarrett, T., Kopan, E. L., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Light, R. M., Marsh, K. A., McCallon, H., Schneider, S., Stiening, R., Sykes, M., Weinberg, M., Wheaton, W. A., Wheelock, S., & Zacarias, N. Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2012, Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products, Tech. rep. de Zeeuw, P. T., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., & Blaauw, A. 1999, AJ, 117, 354 Douglass, G. G., Mason, B. D., Rafferty, T. J., Holdenried, E. R., & Germain, M. E. 2000, AJ, 119, 3071 Egan, M. P., Price, S. D., Kraemer, K. E., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 5114, 0 Eiroa, C., Marshall, J. P., Mora, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 536, L4 Fitzpatrick, E. L. & Massa, D. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1209 Fricke, W., Schwan, H., Corbin, T., et al. 1991, Veroeffentlichungen des Astronomischen Rechen-Instituts Heidelberg, 33, 1 Fricke, W., Schwan, H., Lederle, T., et al. 1988, Veroeffentlichungen des Astronomischen Rechen-Instituts Heidelberg, 32, 1 Fujiwara, H., Onaka, T., Ishihara, D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, L152 Fujiwara, H., Onaka, T., Takita, S., et al. 2012a, ApJ, 759, L18 Fujiwara, H., Onaka, T., Yamashita, T., et al. 2012b, ApJ, 749, L29 Fujiwara, H., Yamashita, T., Ishihara, D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 695, L88 Gielen, C., van Winckel, H., Min, M., Waters, L. B. F. M., & Lloyd Evans, T. 2008, A&A, 490, 725 Hartmann, W. K., Ryder, G., Dones, L., & Grinspoon, D. 2000, The Time- Dependent Intense Bombardment of the Primordial Earth/Moon System, ed. R. K. . e. a. Canup, R. M., 493 -- 512 Hern´andez, J., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 856 Holmberg, J., Nordstrom, B., & Andersen, J. 2009, A&A, 501, 941 Holmes, E. K., Butner, H. M., Fajardo-Acosta, S. B., & Rebull, L. M. 2003, AJ, 125, 3334 Honda, M., Kataza, H., Okamoto, Y. K., et al. 2004, ApJ, 610, L49 Houk, N. 1978, Michigan Catalog of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for HD Stars, Vol. 2 (Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Dept. Astron.), ed. N. Houk 14 Houk, N. 1982, Michigan Catalog of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for HD Stars, Vol. 3 (Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Dept. Astron.), ed. N. Houk Houk, N. & Cowley, A. P. 1975, Michigan Catalog of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for HD Stars, Vol. 1 (Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Dept. Astron.), ed. A. P. Houk, N. & Cowley Houk, N. & Smith-Moore, M. 1988, Michigan Catalog of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for HD Stars, Vol. 4 (Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Dept. Astron.), ed. J. Warren, W. H. Houk, N. & Swift, C. 1999, Michigan Catalog of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for HD Stars, Vol. 5 (Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Dept. Astron.), ed. C. Houk, N. & Swift Ishihara, D., Onaka, T., Kataza, H., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A1 Jaschek, C., Conde, H., & de Sierra, A. C. 1964, Observatory Astronomical La Plata Series Astronomies, 28, 1 Josselin, E., Loup, C., Omont, A., et al. 1998, A&AS, 129, 45 Kataza, H., Okamoto, Y., Takubo, S., et al. 2000, in Presented at the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference, Vol. 4008, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. M. Iye & A. F. Moorwood, 1144 -- 1152 Kennedy, P. M. 1996, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 3078, 0 Kurucz, R. L. 1992, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 149, The Stellar Populations of Galaxies, ed. B. Barbuy & A. Renzini, 225 -- + Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Vidal-Madjar, A., & Ferlet, R. 1996, A&A, 307, 542 Liseau, R., Eiroa, C., Fedele, D., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L132 Lohne, T., Augereau, J.-C., Ertel, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A110 Lord, S. D. 1992, A new software tool for computing Earth's atmospheric trans- mission of near- and far-infrared radiation, Tech. rep. Manoj, P., Bhatt, H. C., Maheswar, G., & Muneer, S. 2006, ApJ, 653, 657 Melis, C., Zuckerman, B., Rhee, J. H., & Song, I. 2010, ApJ, 717, L57 Melis, C., Zuckerman, B., Rhee, J. H., et al. 2012, Nature, 487, 74 Meyer, M. R., Carpenter, J. M., Mamajek, E. E., et al. 2008, ApJ, 673, L181 Montesinos, B., Eiroa, C., Mora, A., & Mer´ın, B. 2009, A&A, 495, 901 Morales, F. Y., Werner, M. W., Bryden, G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1067 Mosser, B., Michel, E., Appourchaux, T., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 33 Mouri, A., Kaneda, H., Ishihara, D., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 561 Murakami, H., Baba, H., Barthel, P., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, 369 Okamoto, Y. K., Kataza, H., Yamashita, T., et al. 2003, in Presented at the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference, Vol. 4841, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. M. Iye & A. F. M. Moorwood, 169 -- 180 Olofsson, J., Juh´asz, A., Henning, T., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A90 Onaka, T., Matsuhara, H., Wada, T., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, 401 Oudmaijer, R. D., van der Veen, W. E. C. J., Waters, L. B. F. M., et al. 1992, A&AS, 96, 625 Pei, Y. C. 1992, ApJ, 395, 130 Pilbratt, G. L., Riedinger, J. R., Passvogel, T., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L1 Price, S. D., Egan, M. P., Carey, S. J., Mizuno, D. R., & Kuchar, T. A. 2001, AJ, 121, 2819 Rebull, L. M., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Werner, M. W., et al. 2008, ApJ, 681, 1484 Rhee, J. H., Song, I., Zuckerman, B., & McElwain, M. 2007, ApJ, 660, 1556 Roeser, S. & Bastian, U. 1988, A&AS, 74, 449 Sako, S., Okamoto, Y. K., Kataza, H., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 1407 Schutz, O., Meeus, G., Sterzik, M. F., & Peeters, E. 2009, A&A, 507, 261 Sloan, G. C. & Price, S. D. 1998, ApJS, 119, 141 Smith, P. S., Hines, D. C., Low, F. J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, L125 Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Stansberry, J. A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, 675 Takeda, Y. 2007, PASJ, 59, 335 Telesco, C. M., Pina, R. K., Hanna, K. T., et al. 1998, in Presented at the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference, Vol. 3354, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. A. M. Fowler, 534 -- 544 Thompson, M. A., Smith, D. J. B., Stevens, J. A., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L134 Uzpen, B., Kobulnicky, H. A., Monson, A. J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 1264 Winters, J. M., Le Bertre, T., Jeong, K. S., Nyman, L., & Epchtein, N. 2003, A&A, 409, 715 Wright, C. O., Egan, M. P., Kraemer, K. E., & Price, S. D. 2003, AJ, 125, 359 Wyatt, M. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 339 Wyatt, M. C., Smith, R., Greaves, J. S., et al. 2007a, ApJ, 658, 569 Wyatt, M. C., Smith, R., Su, K. Y. L., et al. 2007b, ApJ, 663, 365 Yamamura, I., Makiuti, S., Ikeda, N., et al. 2010, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2298, 0 Zuckerman, B. & Webb, R. A. 2000, ApJ, 535, 959 Table A.1. Log of Subaru/COMICS observations. Fujiwara et al.: AKARI/IRC 18 µm Survey of Warm Debris Disks Object HD 15407 5 Lac HD 15407 HD 15407 γ Aql γ Aql γ Aql HD 165014 HD 165014 HD 165014 ǫ Sco ǫ Sco HD 175726 γ Aql Filter (µm) 18.8 18.8 11.7 8.8 8.8 11.7 18.8 18.8 11.7 8.8 11.7 8.8 11.7 11.7 Date (UT) 16 July 2008 16 July 2008 17 July 2008 17 July 2008 17 July 2008 17 July 2008 16 July 2008 16 July 2008 17 July 2008 17 July 2008 17 July 2008 17 July 2008 17 July 2008 17 July 2008 Table A.2. Log of Gemini/T-ReCS observations. Object HD 105209 HD 110458 HD 105209 HD 105209 HD 105209 HD 105209 HD 105209 HD 110458 HD 110458 HD 110458 HD 110458 HD 110458 HD 106797 HD 110458 HD 106797 HD 106797 HD 106797 HD 106797 HD 106797 HD 110458 HD 110458 HD 110458 HD 110458 HD 110458 HD 110058 HD 110458 HD 110058 HD 110458 Filter (µm) 18.3 18.3 12.3 11.7 10.4 9.7 8.8 8.8 9.7 10.4 11.7 12.3 18.3 18.3 12.3 11.7 10.4 9.7 8.8 8.8 9.7 10.4 11.7 12.3 11.7 11.7 18.3 18.3 Date (UT) 10 June 2008 10 June 2008 11 June 2008 11 June 2008 11 June 2008 11 June 2008 11 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 10 June 2008 10 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 12 June 2008 26 June 2008 26 June 2008 Integ. (s) 2172 116 116 116 116 116 116 58 58 58 58 58 811 116 174 116 58 174 58 58 58 58 58 58 869 58 260 116 Integ. Comment (s) 2400 100 300 100 20 20 400 20 200 100 10 50 300 20 Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Comment Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Appendix A: Logs of Subaru/COMICS and Gemini/T-ReCS Follow-up Observations Here we show the logs of follow-up MIR observations of some debris disk candidates by Subaru/COMICS (Table A.1) and Gemini/T-ReCS (Table A.2). 15
1109.0582	2	1109	2011-10-26T19:45:07	The Optical and Near-Infrared Transmission Spectrum of the Super-Earth GJ1214b: Further Evidence for a Metal-Rich Atmosphere	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present an investigation of the transmission spectrum of the 6.5 M_earth planet GJ1214b based on new ground-based observations of transits of the planet in the optical and near-infrared, and on previously published data. Observations with the VLT+FORS and Magellan+MMIRS using the technique of multi-object spectroscopy with wide slits yielded new measurements of the planet's transmission spectrum from 0.61 to 0.85 micron, and in the J, H, and K atmospheric windows. We also present a new measurement based on narrow-band photometry centered at 2.09 micron with the VLT+HAWKI. We combined these data with results from a re-analysis of previously published FORS data from 0.78 to 1.00 micron using an improved data reduction algorithm, and previously reported values based on Spitzer data at 3.6 and 4.5 micron. All of the data are consistent with a featureless transmission spectrum for the planet. Our K-band data are inconsistent with the detection of spectral features at these wavelengths reported by Croll and collaborators at the level of 4.1 sigma. The planet's atmosphere must either have at least 70% water by mass or optically thick high-altitude clouds or haze to be consistent with the data.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	ApJ in press Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 THE OPTICAL AND NEAR-INFRARED TRANSMISSION SPECTRUM OF THE SUPER-EARTH GJ 1214B: FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR A METAL-RICH ATMOSPHERE Jacob L. Bean1,8, Jean-Michel D´esert1, Petr Kabath2, Brian Stalder1, Sara Seager3, Eliza Miller-Ricci Kempton4,8, Zachory K. Berta1, Derek Homeier5, Shane Walsh6, & Andreas Seifahrt7 ApJ in press ABSTRACT We present an investigation of the transmission spectrum of the 6.5 M⊕ planet GJ 1214b based on new ground-based observations of transits of the planet in the optical and near-infrared, and on previously published data. Observations with the VLT + FORS and Magellan + MMIRS using the technique of multi-object spectroscopy with wide slits yielded new measurements of the planet's transmission spectrum from 0.61 to 0.85 µm, and in the J, H, and K atmospheric windows. We also present a new measurement based on narrow-band photometry centered at 2.09 µm with the VLT + HAWKI. We combined these data with results from a re-analysis of previously published FORS data from 0.78 to 1.00 µm using an improved data reduction algorithm, and previously reported values based on Spitzer data at 3.6 and 4.5 µm. All of the data are consistent with a featureless transmission spectrum for the planet. Our K-band data are inconsistent with the detection of spectral features at these wavelengths reported by Croll and collaborators at the level of 4.1 σ. The planet's atmosphere must either have at least 70% H2O by mass or optically thick high-altitude clouds or haze to be consistent with the data. Subject headings: planets and satellites: atmospheres -- planets and satellites: individual: GJ 1214b -- techniques: photometric 1. INTRODUCTION Recent results from the Kepler mission indicate that exoplanets intermediate in size between the terrestrial and the ice giant planets in the Solar System are common at small orbital separations from main sequence stars (Borucki et al. 2011; Howard et al. 2011). However, de- spite the wealth of knowledge of the sizes and masses for these planets that will be obtained from the Kepler data and follow-up efforts, there will still be a substan- tial gap in our understanding of these objects. This is because knowledge of only the mass and radius of plan- ets in this regime is not sufficient to determine their bulk composition due to degeneracies that exist in theoreti- cal models (Adams et al. 2008; Rogers & Seager 2010a). Specifically, most planets with masses and radii in the intermediate-size range can be modeled equally well by substantially different combinations of mass and compo- sition for the interior and surrounding atmosphere. Fortunately, there is a way to break the degen- [email protected] 1 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Casilla 19001, Santiago, Chile 3 Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences and Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 4 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 5 Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon, UMR 5574, CNRS, Universit´e de Lyon, ´Ecole Normale Sup´erieure de Lyon, 46 All´ee d'Italie, F-69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France 6 Magellan Fellow, Australian Astronomical Observatory and Curtin Institute of Radio Astronomy, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. 7 Department of Physics, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA 8 Sagan Fellow eracies between different models for a planet when a unique solution for the bulk composition can not be found. The method is to obtain constraints on the planet's atmospheric composition (Miller-Ricci et al. 2009; Miller-Ricci & Fortney 2010). This information provides a boundary condition to further constrain both rigorous physical models and also cosmogonical argu- ments about likely origin and evolutionary scenarios. Therefore, detailed characterization of representative ob- jects to further constrain their bulk compositions is an important complement to the statistical study of the oc- currence rate of populations that is being enabled by Kepler. The transiting planet GJ 1214b (Charbonneau et al. 2009) is one object that is potentially a key to unlocking the mystery of the bulk compositions of intermediate- size planets using atmospheric studies. Its determined mass (6.5 M⊕) and radius (2.65 R⊕) put it firmly in the degenerate region of parameter space for interior and at- mosphere mass and compositions. The only thing that can be said with a high degree of confidence based on just the mass and radius of the planet is that it must have a substantial atmosphere because it is too large to be composed solely of solid material (Rogers & Seager 2010b; Nettelmann et al. 2011). Rogers & Seager (2010b) identified three possible ori- gins for the gas layer on GJ 1214b and they presented dis- tinct interior structure models based on these scenarios that are consistent with its measured mass and radius. The model scenarios are (1) a "Mini-Neptune" planet that is composed mainly of solid rock and ice and that has a significant primordial atmosphere accreted from the protoplanetary nebula and with a composition roughly similar to that of the Sun (i.e., hydrogen-dominated), (2) a "Water World" planet composed primarily of water ice and having a secondary gas envelope formed by sub- 2 Bean et al. limation and dominated by water vapor, and (3) a true "Super-Earth" planet composed of purely rocky material with a secondary atmosphere formed by outgassing and probably composed mainly of hydrogen. Distinguish- ing between these competing models for GJ 1214b would have important consequences because they each imply a very different formation and evolutionary history for the planet. Constraining the formation and evolution- ary history for this planet would be an important step in our quest to obtain a general understanding of the intermediate-size planets for which this object appears to be an archetype. The most interesting characteristic of GJ 1214b is that it orbits a very small M dwarf, and thus the system has a planet-to-star radius ratio comparable to a Jupiter-size planet transiting a Sun-like star. This quality makes it the most feasible known intermediate-size planet for at- mospheric studies using transit spectroscopy techniques. The three models proposed for the planet would also exhibit very different transmission spectrum features. Mini-Neptune and true Super-Earth planets with their hydrogen-dominated, and thus large scale height, atmo- spheres would exhibit relatively large spectral features in transmission owing to absorption by trace gases like wa- ter and methane, and scattering by molecular hydrogen and cloud or haze particles. On the other hand, a Water World planet with a primarily water vapor atmosphere, and thus small scale height, would exhibit relatively small spectral features in transmission. We recently obtained measurements of GJ 1214b's transmission spectrum in the red optical (0.78 -- 1.00 µm) with the FORS instrument on the VLT using a new ground-based technique to constrain the planet's atmo- spheric composition (Bean et al. 2010). This remark- ably featureless spectrum is consistent with a model for a metal-rich atmosphere with a small scale height, and inconsistent with a model for cloud-free hydrogen- dominated atmospheres, which would have a large scale height. Clouds or haze in a hydrogen-dominated at- mosphere could conceivably also yield a flat spectrum consistent with the observations. Subsequently, we pre- sented broadband photometric measurements obtained at 3.6 and 4.5 µm with Spitzer that provided addi- tional constraints on the composition of the atmosphere (D´esert et al. 2011). These data were also consistent with a featureless transmission spectrum when analyzed in isolation and in combination with the FORS data, but the overall interpretation of the flat spectrum remained uncertain due to the possibility of clouds or haze pro- viding a gray opacity source, and non-equilibrium abun- dances of methane, which is the primary expected opac- ity source at 3.6 µm. In contrast to the results showing a featureless spectrum, Croll et al. (2011a) presented ground-based near-infrared photometry observations that indicated GJ 1214b's transmission spectrum has a large feature in the Ks-band (bandpass approximately 2.0 -- 2.3 µm) based on the measurement of a substantially deeper tran- sit in that band as compared to the observations at other wavelengths. The main interpretation of the observations in this case is unambiguous; the large scale height of a hydrogen-dominated atmosphere is required for such a feature to be observed. Crossfield et al. (2011) presented high-resolution spec- troscopy of GJ 1214b between 2.1 -- 2.4 µm. They de- tected no spectral features, but could not comment on the absolute depth of the transit at these wave- lengths due to the purely differential nature of their data. Crossfield et al. (2011) came to similar conclusions as D´esert et al. (2011) did based on the Spitzer data be- cause methane is also the expected source of wavelength- dependent opacity in the their observational window. The observational results showing a featureless trans- mission spectrum for GJ 1214b and the result from Croll et al. (2011a) indicating large spectral features in the near-infrared are not strictly in conflict because they either were obtained at different wavelengths [i.e., the Bean et al. (2010) and D´esert et al. (2011) studies] or have different sensitivities [i.e., the Crossfield et al. (2011) investigation]. Also, there is a plausible qualita- tive explanation for all the observations: a hyrodgen- dominated atmosphere depleted in methane and with clouds or haze opaque at optical wavelengths. However, there is some tension because, for all the plausibility of the qualitative model, it is not supported by physical cal- culations at this point, and it has to be finely tuned to match the observations. Given the outstanding issues in our understanding of GJ 1214b's atmosphere, we were motivated to conduct further observational studies of its transmission spectrum to improve our understanding of this important world. In particular, we aimed to make independent measurements of the planet's transmission spectrum in the K-band re- gion using a different technique than Croll et al. (2011a) used, and also to make measurements further in the blue part of the optical to search for the signature of scatter- ing from cloud, haze, or gas particles. We present here the results of these investigations. In §2 we describe our observations and data reduction. In §3 we describe our analysis of the data. We compare our new measurements of the planet's transmission spectrum to previous mea- surements and theoretical models in §4. We conclude in §5 with a summary of the results. 2. DATA 2.1. Magellan + MMIRS 2.1.1. Observations We observed transits of GJ 1214b on 2011 May 15 and 18 using the MMIRS instrument (McLeod et al. 2004) on the Magellan (Clay) telescope at Las Campanas Ob- servatory. We used the same multi-object spectroscopy approach for the MMIRS observations as was used for the FORS observations of GJ 1214b that we presented previously (Bean et al. 2010). We gathered time-series spectra for GJ 1214b and three other reference stars of similar brightness within 6′ using slits with lengths of 30′′ and widths of 12′′. The off-axis guide and wavefront sen- sor of the instrument, which is sensitive to wavelengths between 0.6 and 0.9 µm, was used to feed corrections to the telescope control and active optics systems. We used an HK grism as the dispersive element and an HK filter to isolate the first order spectra. Complete spectra from 1.23 to 2.48 µm with a dispersion of 6.6 A pixel−1 were obtained for all the objects. As described below, only the data obtained on the sec- ond night are reliable. The observations for this transit spanned 2.63 h from UT 06:15 to 08:53. Exposure times 3 Fig. 1. -- An example spectrum extracted from the MMIRS data for GJ 1214. The broad bandpasses in the J, H, and K atmospheric windowns are indicated by the grey boxes. were 25 s, and the overhead per exposure including the read and reset time of the detector was 14 s. A total of 239 exposures were obtained, 79 of which were in tran- sit. The observations began when the field was at an airmass of 1.20, and by the end the field had set to an airmass of 1.58. Conditions were clear and the seeing varied between 0.5 and 0.9′′ as estimated by the width of the spatial profiles of the obtained spectra. 2.1.2. Data reduction The MMIRS data were recorded using the "up-the- ramp" sampling mode of the detector in which non- destructive reads were obtained every 5 s and stored in a data cube. In the first step of the data reduction, we subtracted the first of these reads from the others on a pixel-by-pixel basis in each frame to remove the bias and persistence from previous exposures. The estimated dark current of the detector is 0.06 e− s −1 pixel−1, which is negligible for this experiment. After subtracting the first read in the data cube for an exposure, we then fit a slope to the up-the-ramp samples for each pixel to deter- mine the count rate. We arrived at the final estimate of the total pixel counts by multiplying the count rate by the total exposure time. The reduction of the MMIRS data cubes gave reason- able results for the second data set, but we noticed a re- peating pattern of discontinuities in the residuals when fitting the up-the-ramp samples for the first data set. The origin of this effect is likely a problem in the detec- tor electronics. We chose not to include the first data set in the final analysis because of this problem; in what follows we focus only on the analysis of the data set ob- tained on the 18th. After the data processing to collapse the data cubes, we applied spectroscopic flat-field corrections, subtracted the background, and extracted one-dimensional spectra for the objects using the same algorithms as for our previ- ous multi-object spectroscopy observations (Bean et al. 2010). We established the wavelength scale of the ex- tracted stellar spectra based on spectra of an Ar emission lamp obtained following the transit observation using a copy of the science mask with the slit widths set to 0.5′′. We adopted a third-order polynomial form for the wave- length solution. The wavelength calibration was done independently for each of the four slits, and the maxi- Fig. 2. -- The MMIRS K-band raw time-series data for GJ 1214 (filled circles) and the composite reference (open diamonds). mum dispersion from the fits was 0.3 A. After applying the wavelength solution to the data, we noticed offsets between the positions of telluric absorption lines in the spectra extracted from the first image. These offsets are consistent with a misalignment in the rotation angle be- tween the science mask and the calibration mask. We de- termined and applied offset corrections to the zero point of the wavelength scale of each object. The maximal correction size was 38 A, which is equivalent to approxi- mately six pixels. The positions of the spectra on the detector varied in both the spatial and spectral directions during the time- series due to imperfect guiding and instrument flexure, and this led to apparent shifts in the extracted 1d spec- tra relative to each other. We cross-correlated the spec- tra for each object relative to the first spectrum in the time-series, and then shifted them by this amount to cor- rect for the effect of the drift. The position of the spec- tra drifted by 2.5 pixels over the course of the first 25 exposures, and then there was a sudden shift of approx- imately 3 pixels. The position of data after the large jump remained relatively stable with a rms of 0.15 pix- els and only a small long-term drift totaling 0.13 pixels. We removed the first 30 points from the time-series to avoid problems caused by the large instability at the be- ginning. There is still sufficient out-of-transit baseline (45 minutes) with these points removed, and the model fits are substantially better for the trimmed light curves. An example spectrum of GJ 1214 is shown in Figure 1. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the GJ 1214 spectra estimated from photon counting statistics reaches up- wards of 475 pixel−1 in the H-band atmospheric window where the maximum number of counts were recorded. We estimate that the resolution of the stellar spectra is approximately 50 A (7.5 pixels). This estimate is based on the intrinsic resolving power of the grism (R ≡ λ/∆λ ≈ 560 for a 1.0′′ slit), the atmospheric seeing, errors in the correction for the motion of the stars on the slits dur- ing the observations, and the uncertainty in the absolute wavelength scale. 2.1.3. Extraction of the photometric time-series 4 Bean et al. Fig. 3. -- Normalized residuals (circles) from the MMIRS broadband K-band light curve fits without the airmass (left panel) and the spatial spectrum position (right panel) decorrelations as a function of those parameters. The decorrelation fits are indicated by the solid lines. We created broadband photometric time-series from the extracted spectra in the J, H, and K atmospheric windows, and four spectroscopic time-series in the K- band of width 0.1 µm by summing the obtained spectra within a bandpass. As discussed in §3, both the broad- band and spectroscopic data provide insight to the com- position of the planet's atmosphere. We do not feel that the J- and H-band data are of sufficient quality to justify subdividing them into spectroscopic channels. The definitions of the utilized bands and the deter- mined planet-to-star radius ratios (Rp/R⋆) from the light curve modeling (see §3) are given in Table 1. The limits of the broad bandpasses were chosen to match standard near-infrared filter curves1 as closely as possible to avoid regions with significant telluric water absorption and to enable quick comparison with other results, in partic- ular the Ks-band measurement of Croll et al. (2011a). However, our data do not include the entire range of the standard J-band, and the combination of the grism and order-blocking filter we used has substantially different transmission properties than broadband filters. The ex- act locations of the bandpass edges were also set so that the spectra were not cut in the middle of strong absorp- tion lines. Therefore, appropriately weighted integration of the atmospheric models for the planet are necessary for robust comparison of results even at similar wavelengths. The time-series data for GJ 1214 in each bandpass were corrected by dividing out the sum of the data for the ref- erence stars. In the subsequent light curve modeling, we found that including all of the reference stars in this step yielded a worse correction than when one of them was excluded. A possible explanation for this is that the spectra for the problematic reference star fell along the boundary between different read-out channels in the detector. The motion of the spectra during the time- series resulted in the spectra for this object moving back and forth across the boundary and this could have intro- duced additional noise in the data. For the final analysis, Photometric Bandpasses & Transit Depths for the MMIRS Data TABLE 1 Band Wavelength (µm) Rp/R⋆ a Broadband analysis J H K Spectroscopic analysis channel 1 channel 2 channel 3 channel 4 1.25 -- 1.33 1.50 -- 1.77 1.98 -- 2.31 0.1158 ± 0.0024 0.1146 ± 0.0014 0.1158 ± 0.0006 1.98 -- 2.08 2.08 -- 2.18 2.18 -- 2.28 2.28 -- 2.38 0.1156 ± 0.0007 0.1163 ± 0.0007 0.1158 ± 0.0006 0.1163 ± 0.0011 a From an analysis with the transit parameters a/R⋆ and i fixed to 14.97 and 88.94◦, respectively. we excluded the data for the bad reference star, and we used only the data for the other two reference stars to correct the GJ 1214 time-series. The estimated photon- limited uncertainties in the photometry for the reference star were propagated through to the final uncertainties in the GJ 1214 data. An illustration of the reference star correction to the broadband K-band data is shown in Figure 2. After correcting the time-series for GJ 1214 using the reference star data, we identified additional systematics correlated with the airmass of the observations and the positions of the spectra in the spatial dimension on the detector. We fit for linear decorrelations against these two parameters simultaneously with the light curve mod- eling described in §3 to remove these effects (two free parameters in addition to the normalization). Adding higher-order terms and decorrelating against airmass and spatial pixel position for the individual stellar fluxes (i.e., GJ 1214 and the reference stars) did not improve the results. The correlations between the reference star- corrected light curve residuals and the resulting linear fits for these two parameters are shown in Figure 3. 1 See http://www.cfht.hawaii.edu/Instruments/Filters/wircam.html for the properties of the filters used by Croll et al. (2011a). The MMIRS broadband light curves for GJ 1214 after all corrections and decorrelations exhibit residuals from 5 Fig. 4. -- An example spectrum extracted from the FORS blue data for GJ 1214 a best-fit model with rms of 1532, 887, and 706 ppm in the J-, H-, and K-bands, respectively. These values are factors of 3.9, 6.0, and 3.4 higher than expected from the photon-limited uncertainties. The H-band data exhibit an especially larger-than-expected scatter of unknown origin. We experimented with changing the bandpasses to investigate this issue. Shifting the bandpasses and also using smaller and larger windows did not significantly affect the results. We speculate that perhaps the trans- parency of the Earth's atmosphere varies on different spa- tial scales among the near-infrared atmospheric windows; and that this scale, along with the number, color, and spatial distribution of reference stars, sets the fundamen- tal limit when working in the . 1000 ppm photon-limited regime in the near-infrared. When binned over 60 s, the rms of the K-band residuals is 443 ppm. These are the highest-precision ground-based near-infrared transit light curve data that we are aware of. The rms of the residuals for the K-band spectroscopic channels range from 923 ppm to 1552 ppm, and the scaling from the ex- pected levels of noise range from 2.3 to 2.8. 2.2. VLT + FORS We observed one transit of GJ 1214b on 2011 July 3 using the multi-object spectroscopy mode of the FORS instrument (Appenzeller et al. 1998) on UT1 of the VLT facility at Paranal Observatory. The instrument setup and data reduction were very similar to the previous FORS observations described in Bean et al. (2010) and Berta et al. (2011), and we limit our discussion here to the unique aspects of the current study. We used the 600RI grism with the GG435 filter to ob- tain spectra over the range 610 -- 850 nm for GJ 1214 and five reference stars. Observations began at UT 02:04 and continued for 3.12 h to UT 05:11. The field was at an air- mass of 1.20 at the beginning, rose to an airmass of 1.15, and then set to an airmass of 1.33 by the end. The ex- posure times were 18 s, which gave a total duty cycle of 55 s including 37 s of overhead. A total of 194 exposures were obtained, 57 of which were during the transit. Our approach for the data reduction, spectral extrac- tion, and wavelength calibration were the same as for the previous FORS observations (Bean et al. 2010), with one exception. During the wavelength calibration step, we identified a few lamp lines in the FORS atlas that must have inaccurate assigned wavelengths because they Fig. 5. -- The broadband FORS blue raw time-series data for GJ 1214 (filled circles) and the composite reference (open dia- monds). were significantly discrepant from a low-order polyno- mial dispersion model. When we did not include these lines in the solution, it became clear that a third-order polynomial model for the dispersion was justified instead of the linear model we had used previously and that is also advocated in the instrument manual. The residuals from the third-order dispersion fit with the bad lines ig- nored are typically 0.005 nm, whereas the residuals are typically 0.5 nm from a linear model with the bad lines included. This new insight to the wavelength scale of FORS grism data prompted us to re-analyze the previous data for the two transits of GJ 1214b from Bean et al. (2010), and we present the new results below. We believe that the resolution of the data can be reliably increased now that the wavelength solution has been significantly im- proved, and we re-bin the old spectroscopic data to 10 nm instead of the 20 nm used before. The reduction and correction of the data are otherwise unchanged. The basic properties of the data remain the same after the re-analysis, and the conclusions from Bean et al. (2010) are strengthened. In the rest of the paper we refer to the new FORS data as the FORS "blue" data, and the re-analyzed old data as the FORS "red" data. An example spectrum of GJ 1214 extracted from the FORS blue data is shown in Figure 4. The signal-to- noise ratio in the GJ 1214 spectra estimated from pho- ton counting statistics reaches upwards of 300 pixel−1 at 900 nm, but only 50 pixel−1 at 600 nm due to GJ 1214's extremely red spectral energy distribution. We created both a broadband and spectroscopic light curves from the FORS blue data by summing over the full wavelength range and over twelve channels with widths of 20 nm, which is the lowest we feel that we can go without systematic errors given the quality of the data. We combined the data for four of the reference stars and divided the composite from the GJ 1214 time-series to correct it. The fifth reference star was found to yield a worse correction to the photometry of GJ 1214 and was not included in our final analysis. An illustration of the reference star correction to the broadband data is shown in Figure 5. 6 Bean et al. TABLE 2 Mid-transit Times Instrument Epocha Tc (BJDTDB)b O - C (s)c MMIRS FORS HAWKI 464 493 517 2455699.832866 ± 6.9E-5 -7.6 ± 5.9 2455745.664729 ± 6.0E-5 +3.1 ± 5.2 2455783.59440 ± 1.1E-4 -0.4 ± 9.5 a Integer number of orbital periods since the transit on 2009 May 15. b BJDTDB is the the Barycentric Julian Date in the Barycentric Dynamical Time standard (Eastman et al. 2010). c Residuals form the ephemeris given in §3. in the field-of-view within the linearity range of the de- tector. To improve the duty cycle, six separate exposures were averaged on the chip to produce a single recorded image. The total time to integrate the exposures, read out the data, and reset the detector was 28 s. A total of 337 images were obtained, 110 of which were during transit. The maximum counts for GJ 1214, which was the brightest star in the field-of-view, ranged from 9,000 to 25,000 e−. This is well below the the 1% non-linearity level for the HAWKI detectors (approximately 60,000 e−) and no non-linearity corrections were applied to the data. The seeing reported by the observatory atmospheric sta- tion varied from 0.9 to 3.2′′ during the observations, but we recall that the guide probe of the telescope never reg- istered more than 1.6′′ (this information is not included in the image headers). After bias subtraction and flat fielding the HAWKI images, we measured aperture photometry for GJ 1214 and 11 other stars. The photometric aperture and sky annulus sizes were optimized to give the lowest dispersion in the light curve for GJ 1214. We settled on a stellar aperture radius of 26 pixels, and a sky annulus inner radius of 31 pixels and outer radius of 41 pixels for the final analysis. We corrected the time-series photometry of GJ 1214 by dividing out the sum of a number of the reference stars. We experimented with different combinations of the reference stars for the correction, and we ultimately used a composite of four of them for the final analysis. A plot of the raw time-series for GJ 1214 and the composite reference is shown in Figure 6. After the reference star correction, we noticed a slow and smooth variation in the corrected GJ 1214 relative flux values with time superimposed on the expected tran- sit light curve morphology. This trend is potentially re- lated to the large color difference between GJ 1214 and the reference stars, although the bandpass of the utilized filter is relatively narrow. Similar trends are regularly seen in ground-based near-infrared transit photometry (e.g., Croll et al. 2010a,b, 2011a,b; Sada et al. 2010), so this probably arises from a property of Earth's atmo- sphere. We found that the trend in our data was best modeled by a second order polynomial with time, and we fit for such a function simultaneously with the transit modeling (see §3, two free parameters in addition to the normalization). Similar results, but with higher disper- sion in the light curve residuals and larger determined parameter uncertainties, are obtained when decorrelat- ing the data with a linear trend as a function of airmass. The data from three of the images were found to deviate by more than five times the standard deviation of the Fig. 6. -- The HAWKI raw time-series data for GJ 1214 (filled circles) and the composite reference (open diamonds). As with our previous study of FORS data, we identified a slow and smooth variation in the corrected relative flux values with time superimposed on the expected transit light curve morphology. This effect is probably due to the smudges on the FORS atmospheric dispersion corrector described by Moehler et al. (2010). We fit for a second- order polynomial as a function of time simultaneously with the transit modeling (see §3) to account for this (two free parameters in addition to the normalization). The FORS blue broadband light curve for GJ 1214 af- ter all corrections and decorrelations exhibits residuals from a best-fit model with a rms of 457 ppm. This is a factor of 2.5 larger than expected from the estimated photon noise. The rms of the residuals for the spectro- scopic channels range from 665 ppm to 1785 ppm, and the scaling from the expected levels of noise range from 1.2 to 1.4. 2.3. VLT + HAWKI We observed one transit of GJ 1214b on 2011 August 10 using the standard imaging mode of the HAWKI instru- ment (Kissler-Patig et al. 2008) on UT4 of the VLT facil- ity at Paranal Observatory. The observations were done using the NB2090 filter (λc = 2095 nm, width = 20 nm). In contrast to previously reported HAWKI observa- tions of exoplanet transits (e.g., Gillon et al. 2009; Anderson et al. 2010; Gibson et al. 2010), we chose to maintain a single pointing throughout the observations instead of using a dither pattern. This "staring" ap- proach has been used for observations with a similar in- strument to obtain the highest-precision ground-based transit light curves in the near-infrared up to now (ap- proximately 700 ppm minute−1; e.g., Croll et al. 2010a,b, 2011b). We reach a similar level of precision in our data using the staring approach, and this suggests that the single pointing method is indeed the best technique to use for exoplanet transit observations with HAWKI. Observations began at UT 01:03 and continued for 2.68 h to UT 03:44. The field was at an airmass of 1.15 at the beginning, and it set to an airmass of 1.64 by the end. The exposure times were 1.6762 s, which is the minimum possible for the normal mode of HAWKI. The telescope was defocussed slightly to keep the counts for all the stars 7 Fig. 7. -- Upper panels Normalized broadband (left panel) and K-band spectroscopic (right panel) light curves from the MMIRS data (circles). The best-fit models are shown as the solid lines. Bottom panels Residuals from the fits (circles). residuals from a best-fit model. These discrepant points were removed for the final analysis. The HAWKI light curve for GJ 1214 after all correc- tions, decorrelations, and trimming of discrepant points exhibits residuals from a best-fit model with a rms of 1259 ppm. The rms of the residuals is 732 ppm when the data are binned to 60 s. The dispersion of the per-image residuals in the un-binned data is a factor of 1.3 larger than expected from the estimated photon noise. 3. ANALYSIS We fit the broadband and spectroscopic light curves for GJ 1214 with a transit model multiplied by a nor- malization factor and systematic decorrelation functions to investigate the transmission spectrum of its transiting planet. We used the exact analytic formulas including quadratic limb darkening given by Mandel & Agol (2002) for the transit model. The transit model was parameter- ized by the planet-to-star radius ratio (Rp/R⋆), system scale (a/R⋆), orbital inclination of the planet (i), mid- transit time of the planet (Tc), and the stellar quadratic limb darkening coefficients (γ1 and γ2). The orbital pe- riod of the planet was fixed to the revised value given below, and the eccentricity was fixed to zero. The nor- malization factor for each data set was always a free pa- rameter. The decorrelation functions described in §2 re- quire two additional free parameters for each wavelength bin. We estimated limb darkening coefficients appropriate for transits of GJ 1214b using spherically symmetric stel- lar model atmospheres calculated with the PHOENIX code (Hauschildt et al. 1999). We adopted the stellar parameters for the baseline model Tef f = 3026 K, [M/H] = 0.0, log g = 5.0, and R⋆ = 0.21 R⊙. We also computed models at the baseline effective temperature ± 130 K. For the MMIRS and FORS spectroscopic data, the model intensities at each wavelength were scaled to the actual counts in the utilized spectra for GJ 1214 to account for the unique bandpass and flux weighting of the resulting photometry. For the HAWKI photometric data, we es- timated the effective observed stellar spectrum by mul- tiplying the baseline theoretical stellar spectrum by a theoretical model for the transmission of Earth's atmo- sphere and by the transmission curve of the utilized fil- ter. The theoretical model for the transmission of Earth's atmosphere was calculated for the line of sight through atmosphere above the observatory on the night of the ob- servations using the method described by Seifahrt et al. (2010). After integrating over the effective bandpasses, we fit a quadratic function to the intensities to determine the limb darkening coefficients. We limited our fits to the range µ ≡ cos θ < 0.1, where θ is the angle between the emergent intensity and the line of sight. We allowed the limb darkening coefficients to be free parameters in the light curve modeling, and we used the estimated theoretical values as priors. That is, the differences between the coefficients used for the light- curve modeling and the coefficients calculated from the 8 Bean et al. Fig. 8. -- Left panel Normalized light curves from the FORS blue data (circles) and best-fit models (lines). Right panel Residuals from the fits (circles). PHOENIX models were included in the tabulation of the goodness-of-fit metric (see below). The adopted uncer- tainties for the priors were set by the spread in the values for the coefficients at the three different temperatures considered for GJ 1214. We also tested the effects of using the Claret (2000) non-linear limb darkening law. While this functional form yielded better fits at µ < 0.1 for the MMIRS data, it did not yield better light curve fits and the final determined transmision spectrum val- ues for the planet are not significantly affected by using it instead of the quadratic law. The best-fit limb darkening coefficients were in all cases within 2 σ of the theoretical values estimated from the Tef f = 3026 K model atmo- sphere. We first analyzed the broadband light curves (MMIRS J, H, and K; FORS blue and red; and HAWKI) to de- termine values for all the transit parameters. We ana- lyzed the MMIRS, FORS, and HAWKI data separately. We assumed the system scale, inclination, and transit time are the same for the J-, H-, and K-band MMIRS data because they were obtained simultaneously for the same transit. Each of the MMIRS bands were allowed to have a unique transit depth. We used a non-linear least- squares algorithm (Markwardt 2009) to identify the best- fit parameters, and a residual permutation bootstrap al- gorithm to asses the uncertainties on the parameters. The standard χ2 metric was used throughout to asses the quality of the model fits. The determined transit times from analysis of the TABLE 3 Photometric Bandpasses & Transit Depths for the FORS Blue Data Band Wavelength (nm) Rp/R⋆ a broadband channel 1 channel 2 channel 3 channel 4 channel 5 channel 6 channel 7 channel 8 channel 9 channel 10 channel 11 channel 12 610 610 630 650 670 690 710 730 750 770 790 810 830 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 850 630 650 670 690 710 730 750 770 790 810 830 850 0.1178 ± 0.0007 0.1173 ± 0.0018 0.1195 ± 0.0012 0.1167 ± 0.0011 0.1194 ± 0.0011 0.1169 ± 0.0009 0.1164 ± 0.0009 0.1182 ± 0.0007 0.1187 ± 0.0008 0.1172 ± 0.0008 0.1172 ± 0.0007 0.1183 ± 0.0006 0.1168 ± 0.0007 a From an analysis with the transit parameters a/R⋆ and i fixed to 14.97 and 88.94◦, respectively. broadband data with all parameters free are given in Table 2. Combining these times with the previously reported times from D´esert et al. (2011), Carter et al. (2011), and Berta et al. (2011), we can calculate a re- vised period P = 1.58040481 ± 1.2E-7 d, and reference transit time Tc = 2454966.525123± 0.000032 BJDTDB. The new transit times in this paper deviate by less than 1.3σ from the predictions of this ephemeris, and none of other transit times exhibit deviations greater than 2.4 σ. The best-fit values of the system scale and the planet's TABLE 4 Photometric Bandpasses & Transit Depths for the FORS Red Data Band Wavelength (nm) Rp/R⋆ a broadband channel 1 channel 2 channel 3 channel 4 channel 5 channel 6 channel 7 channel 8 channel 9 channel 10 channel 11 channel 12 channel 13 channel 14 channel 15 channel 16 channel 17 channel 18 channel 19 channel 20 channel 21 channel 22 780 780 790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 890 900 910 920 930 940 950 960 970 980 990 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1000 790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 890 900 910 920 930 940 950 960 970 980 990 1000 0.1168 ± 0.0006 0.1167 ± 0.0009 0.1160 ± 0.0007 0.1156 ± 0.0007 0.1176 ± 0.0008 0.1176 ± 0.0007 0.1162 ± 0.0007 0.1172 ± 0.0007 0.1151 ± 0.0008 0.1168 ± 0.0007 0.1171 ± 0.0007 0.1171 ± 0.0007 0.1159 ± 0.0007 0.1167 ± 0.0006 0.1175 ± 0.0007 0.1178 ± 0.0006 0.1165 ± 0.0009 0.1168 ± 0.0008 0.1176 ± 0.0009 0.1172 ± 0.0009 0.1161 ± 0.0010 0.1165 ± 0.0011 0.1168 ± 0.0011 a From an analysis with the transit parameters a/R⋆ and i fixed to 14.97 and 88.94◦, respectively. orbital inclination for the broadband data are consistent with previously determined values (e.g., Carter et al. 2011; Berta et al. 2011). We fixed these parameters to the values used by Bean et al. (2010, a/R⋆ = 14.9749, i = 88.94◦) to measure the transit depth as a function of wavelength in the subsequent analyses. These values were also adopted by D´esert et al. (2011) and Croll et al. (2011a) in their studies, so we can directly compare our results with theirs. We also fixed all the transit times to the predicted values (not best-fit) from the ephemeris given above. This is justified because there is no evidence of transit timing variations for this system. We performed two types of analyses to measure the planet's transmission spectrum. We used non-linear least-squares fitting with a residual permutation boot- strap to analyze the broadband light curves. For the spectroscopic data sets, we used a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm to find the most likely param- eter values and their uncertainties. The adopted photo- metric errors for the MCMC analysis were the photon- limited errors adjusted upwards to yield a reduced χ2 = 1 for the best fit. The free parameters for each wavelength bin in the two analyses were Rp/R⋆, quadratic limb- darkening coefficients (with priors), flux normalization, and decorrelation parameters. There were a total of six free parameters for each wavelength bin, and two "obser- vations" per bin in addition to the light curves (the limb darkening priors). The motivation for the different analyses between the broadband and spectroscopic data sets is that they are used in different ways to investigate the planet's trans- mission spectrum. The broadband data are useful when compared to theoretical models in aggregate because they span a wide range of wavelengths. For this kind of study, the correlated, or red, noise in each data set must be considered because the observations were ob- tained for different transits with different instruments 9 Fig. 9. -- Upper panel The normalized HAWKI light curve (cir- cles) and best-fit model (line). Lower panel Residuals from the best-fit model (circles). over the course of years. On the other hand, the spectro- scopic data sets each tightly constrain the planet's trans- mission spectrum on their own. These measurements were obtained simultaneously with the same instrument for the same transit and over a limited wavelength range. In this case, the major sources of correlated noise, vari- ations in Earth's atmospheric transparency and stellar spot crossing, are quite similar from channel to channel within a data set. Therefore, a full correlated noise anal- ysis is not appropriate when the resulting planet trans- mission spectra for each spectroscopic data set are only examined in isolation, as we do in §4. The determined Rp/R⋆ values for the MMIRS, FORS blue, and FORS red data are given in Tables 1, 3, and 4, respectively. The determined Rp/R⋆ for the HAWKI data is 0.1179 ± 0.0012. The normalized light curves with systematics removed along with the best-fit transit mod- els and residuals from the models are shown in Figures 7 (MMIRS data), 8 (FORS blue data), and 9 (HAWKI data). The re-analyzed FORS red data do not look sub- stantially different than those data shown by Bean et al. (2010, spectroscopic data) and Berta et al. (2011, broad- band data). There is some indication of the planet crossing spots on the surface of GJ 1214 in the FORS blue data. We per- formed tests to investigate the influence of masking the possible spot crossing events from the light curves. The determined depths of the light curves changed depend- ing on which points were masked, but the variation was always less than the quoted uncertainties on the Rp/R⋆ values, and the relative values of the FORS blue trans- mission spectrum were unchanged. The results presented here are from an analysis with none of the light curve points masked. 4. DISCUSSION We compare our newly measured transit depths to previous results and the predictions of theoretical mod- els to investigate the nature of GJ 1214b's atmosphere in this section. We utilize the models presented by Miller-Ricci & Fortney (2010) throughout. The goals of our investigation are to determine the composition of the planet's atmosphere, and to provide an independent as- 10 Bean et al. Fig. 10. -- Broadband measurements of the transmission spectrum of GJ 1214b (filled points) compared to theoretical models (lines). The models were binned over the bandpasses of the measurements (open circles) and scaled to give the best fit to the data. The WIRCAM J- and K-band points from (Croll et al. 2011a, grey asterisks) were not included in the fitting. All calculations were done with high-resolution models; the models shown are smoothed for clarity. sessment of the transit depth in the K-band to test the claim from Croll et al. (2011a) that the transit is signif- icantly deeper at these wavelengths. We look at the broadband, and the optical and K- band spectroscopic data sets separately. The spectro- scopic data enable a search for spectral features within the different regions they cover. The strength of these data sets is that they yield extremely precise measure- ments on an internal scale, and each one tightly con- strains the planet's transmission spectrum. However, there are offsets between the different spectroscopic data sets with sizes that are on the order of the uncertain- ties of the respective broadband points. The FORS blue and red data can be combined because the offset between the data sets can be determined from the values at the wavelengths where they overlap. The FORS and MMIRS spectroscopy can not be combined because the offset be- tween the data sets is uncertain. The broadband data cover a wide span of wavelengths, and thus probe different sources of opacity and dif- ferent atmospheric pressures. These data were taken at different epochs and with different instruments, but can be combined because we considered the correlated noise in each of the data sets, and because the activity- related photometric variability of GJ 1214 itself should only cause variations in the transit depth that are much smaller than the measurement uncertainties (Berta et al. 2011). The excellent agreement between the FORS blue and red observations, which were separated by a year in time, at the wavelengths the data sets have in common (see §4.3) is additional evidence that stellar activity is not a significant problem for this investigation. 4.1. Broadband photometry The broadband measurements of GJ 1214b's transmis- sion spectrum from D´esert et al. (2011, Spitzer data), Croll et al. (2011a, ground-based near-infrared), and this paper are shown compared to theoretical models for the planet's atmosphere in Figure 10. The broadband trans- mission spectrum from the combination of the FORS blue and red, MMIRS, HAWKI, and Spitzer data does not exhibit any significant features. The maximum devi- ation from the weighted mean of the points is 1.7 σ. Up until now, the only candidate detection of spectral features in GJ 1214b's transmission spectrum has been in the K-band by Croll et al. (2011a). Our HAWKI data point in a narrow window of the K-band does not have the precision to provide a strong test of the Croll et al. (2011a) measurement on its own. However, the broad K-band data point created from the combination of the MMIRS spectroscopic data has excellent precision and can provide this test. The MMIRS K-band point is 4.1 σ (∆ Rp/R⋆ = 0.0041 ± 0.0010) lower than the Croll et al. (2011a) K-band point, and is consistent with all of our group's measurements at other wavelengths. Therefore, we do not confirm the detection of spectral features by Croll et al. (2011a). The theoretical models for the planet's atmosphere we compare to the observations were scaled to give the best-fit to the FORS blue and red, MMIRS, HAWKI, and Spitzer points. There are eight data points and one free parameter, and thus seven degrees of freedom for the model fits. A model for the planet's atmo- sphere with a 100% water composition, which is essen- tially flat at the level of the precision of the measure- ments, yields χ2 = 10.1. On the other hand, a model for the planet's atmosphere with a solar composition (i.e., hydrogen-dominated) and assuming chemical equi- librium gives χ2 = 83.9. This suggests that the simple solar composition model is ruled out at 7.9 σ confidence. This strengthens the conclusions we reached previously using subsets of the current data set (Bean et al. 2010; D´esert et al. 2011). Methane is an important opacity source for solar com- position models of GJ 1214b's cool atmosphere, partic- ularly in the K-band and at 3.6 µm. However, the predicted abundance of this molecule is subject to sig- nificant uncertainty because it could be affected by non-equilibrium processes (e.g., photochemistry, ther- mal chemistry, and mixing). Miller-Ricci Kempton et al. 11 the data (χ2 = 0.9), while the solar composition model in equilibrium is ruled out at 4.3 σ confidence using these data alone (χ2 = 24.5). The main opacity source in this window is methane, and the solar composition model with methane artificially removed is consistent with the data (χ2 = 2.0). The conclusion we draw from these data is that the planet's atmosphere must either be metal- enhanced or methane-depleted. 4.3. Optical spectroscopy The optical spectroscopic measurements from the new FORS blue data and the re-analyzed FORS red data are shown with theoretical models in Figure 12. We examine these data in isolation, and adjust the models to give the best fit without consideration for the measurements at other wavelengths. We find that the FORS blue values are on average 0.0007 larger (indicating a deeper transit) than the FORS red data for the wavelength range the two data sets have in common. This is less than the 1 σ uncertainty (0.0011) between the broadband points for each data set. We subtracted this determined offset from the FORS blue data for display in Figure 12 and the calculation of the fit quality for the different models. The FORS optical data include 34 measurements, and there are 33 degrees of freedom for the examination of the model fit quality. The maximum deviation from the weighted mean of the FORS spectroscopic points is 2.3 σ, which suggests that no spectral features are detected in these data. The solar composition model in equilibrium is ruled out at 6.6 σ confidence (χ2 = 115.7) using these data alone. The solar composition model with methane re- moved is discrepant from the FORS data at the 5.2 σ level (χ2 = 91.2). The 100% water composition model is consistent with the data (χ2 = 32.4). Water mass frac- tions of 70% are needed to bring the models within 3 σ of the data, suggesting a highly metal-rich atmosphere. This conclusion is the same as we found before using only the FORS red data at lower resolution (Bean et al. 2010). The higher resolution and precision for the FORS red data enabled by our improved data reduction, and the addition of the blue data tightens the constraints on the planet's optical transmission spectrum. 5. CONCLUSIONS We have obtained new ground-based measurements of the transmission spectrum of the 6.5 M⊕ planet GJ 1214b in the optical between 0.61 and 0.85 µm, and in the J, H, and K near-infrared windows. We have also re-analyzed our previously reported red optical spectroscopy for the planet between 0.78 and 1.00 µm. We were able to push to higher resolution transmission spectrum mea- surements with these data because of improvements in the data reduction algorithm. We combined the new data with previously reported measurements for GJ 1214b's transmission spectrum that were obtained with Spitzer (D´esert et al. 2011). The combined data set spans the visible to the infrared (0.6 to 4.5 µm), which makes it one of the most com- plete exoplanet transmission spectra obtained to date. We compared the combined data set to the previously reported measurements of Croll et al. (2011a) and to theoretical models for the planet's atmosphere from Miller-Ricci & Fortney (2010). Our main conclusion is Fig. 11. -- The derived transmission spectrum of GJ 1214b from the MMIRS K-band spectroscopy (filled triangles) compared to theoretical models (lines). The models were binned over the band- passes of the measurements (open circles) and scaled to give the best fit to the data. All calculations were done with high-resolution models; the models shown are smoothed for clarity. (2011) studied this possibility and concluded that methane depletion can at most only reach atmospheric pressure levels of 10−4 bar, which is far above the al- titude probed by transmission spectroscopy (approxi- mately 0.01 to 1 bar). Similar conclusions have been reached about the difficulty of photochemistry to sig- nificantly alter the methane abundance at observable depths in the atmosphere of the warmer planet GJ 436b (Line et al. 2011). Comparing a solar-composition model with methane artificially removed to our group's broad- band data for GJ 1214b gives χ2 = 43.8, which is dis- crepant at 5.2 σ. A grey broadband optical opacity source is needed for hydrogen-dominated models of the planet's atmosphere to be consistent with the data. Such a source could be high-altitude clouds or haze. The data constrain the al- titude of clouds or haze in GJ 1214b's atmosphere to be at least above a level corresponding to pressures of ap- proximately 0.1 bar. If methane is depleted down to a similar level, then the clouds or haze would only have to be optically thick for wavelengths less than 1 µm. 4.2. K-band spectroscopy In addition to providing broadband measurements, the MMIRS data also yield a low-resolution spectrum of GJ 1214b in the K-band. These data are shown com- pared to theoretical models in Figure 11. We examine these data in isolation, and adjust the models to give the best fit without consideration for the measurements at other wavelengths. There are three degrees of freedom for the model comparisons. The MMIRS K-band spectrum is featureless and flat like the broadband data. The maximum deviation from the weighted mean of the points is 0.5 σ. So not only do we not confirm in our broadband data the deeper K- band transit suggested by Croll et al. (2011a), we also do not detect any spectral features in the planet's at- mosphere at these wavelengths using differential spec- troscopy. Crossfield et al. (2011) previously presented a non-detection of spectral features in this region based on high-resolution differential spectroscopy, and we confirm their results at lower resolution. The 100% water atmosphere model is consistent with 12 Bean et al. Fig. 12. -- The derived transmission spectrum of GJ 1214b from the FORS blue data (filled stars) and FORS red data (filled circles) spectroscopy compared to theoretical models (lines). The FORS blue were adjusted downward by 0.0007 to match the red data in the region where the data sets overlap. The models were binned over the bandpasses of the measurements (open circles) and scaled to give the best fit to the data. All calculations were done with high-resolution models; the models shown are smoothed for clarity. that there is no evidence of features in the planet's trans- mission spectrum, and we do not confirm the detec- tion of a significantly deeper transit in the K-band by Croll et al. (2011a). Our current knowledge of GJ 1214b's mass and ra- dius indicates that the planet must have an atmosphere (Rogers & Seager 2010b; Nettelmann et al. 2011). Our interpretation of the featureless transmission spectrum for the planet is that its atmosphere must either have at least 70% H2O by mass or optically thick high-altitude clouds or haze. A simple cloud- and haze-free model for the planet's atmosphere with solar composition gas in chemical equilibrium is ruled out at high confidence. Alternatively, our knowledge of the planet's radius could be wrong. If the planet were actually significantly smaller (approximately 2 R⊕, or 6.5 σ from the current best estimate), then it would not necessarily need to have a substantial atmosphere. The estimate of GJ 1214b's radius depends on the assumed distance to the system, which is used to estimate the mass of GJ 1214 itself, and this is the link in the chain with the biggest question mark above it because the most recent estimate is based on photographic plate measurements (van Altena et al. 1995). If the parallax were approximately 131 mas (10 σ greater than the current estimate), the radius of the planet determined from the light curves would be con- sistent with the planet having no atmosphere. A new measurement of the system's trigonometric parallax us- ing modern technology would further our knowledge of this important planet. We thank Bryce Croll and Bjorn Benneke for discus- sions pertaining to this work. We thank Brian McCleod and Warren Brown for sharing their knowledge about the MMIRS instrument, and Brice-Olivier Demory for infor- mation about the HAWKI instrument. J.L.B. and E.K. acknowledge funding from NASA through the Sagan Fel- lowship Program. B.S. acknowledges supoort from NSF- MRI grant 0723073. A.S. acknowledges support from NSF grant AST-1108860. The results presented are based on observations made with ESO Telescopes at the Paranal Observatories under program 087.C-0505; and on observations made with the 6.5 m Magellan telescopes located at Las Campanas Observatory. Facilities: VLT:Antu (FORS), VLT:Yepun (HAWKI), Magellan:Clay (MMIRS) REFERENCES Adams, E. R., Seager, S., & Elkins-Tanton, L. 2008, ApJ, 673, Croll, B., Jayawardhana, R., Fortney, J. J., Lafreni`ere, D., & 1160 Anderson, D. R., et al. 2010, A&A, 513, L3+ Appenzeller, I., et al. 1998, The Messenger, 94, 1 Bean, J. L., Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., & Homeier, D. 2010, Nature, 468, 669 Berta, Z. K., Charbonneau, D., Bean, J., Irwin, J., Burke, C. J., D´esert, J.-M., Nutzman, P., & Falco, E. E. 2011, ApJ, 736, 12 Borucki, W. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 19 Carter, J. A., Winn, J. N., Holman, M. J., Fabrycky, D., Berta, Z. K., Burke, C. J., & Nutzman, P. 2011, ApJ, 730, 82 Charbonneau, D., et al. 2009, Nature, 462, 891 Claret, A. 2000, A&A, 363, 1081 Croll, B., Albert, L., Jayawardhana, R., Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., Fortney, J. J., Murray, N., & Neilson, H. 2011a, ApJ, 736, 78 Croll, B., Albert, L., Lafreniere, D., Jayawardhana, R., & Fortney, J. J. 2010a, ApJ, 717, 1084 Albert, L. 2010b, ApJ, 718, 920 Croll, B., Lafreniere, D., Albert, L., Jayawardhana, R., Fortney, J. J., & Murray, N. 2011b, AJ, 141, 30 Crossfield, I. J. M., Barman, T., & Hansen, B. M. S. 2011, ApJ, 736, 132 D´esert, J.-M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, L40+ Eastman, J., Siverd, R., & Gaudi, B. S. 2010, PASP, 122, 935 Gibson, N. P., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, L114 Gillon, M., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 359 Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., Ferguson, J., Baron, E., & Alexander, D. R. 1999, ApJ, 525, 871 Howard, A. W., et al. 2011, ApJ in press, arXiv:1103.2541 Kissler-Patig, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 491, 941 Line, M. R., Vasisht, G., Chen, P., Angerhausen, D., & Yung, Y. L. 2011, ApJ, 738, 32 Mandel, K., & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, L171 Markwardt, C. B. 2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Moehler, S., Freudling, W., Møller, P., Patat, F., Rupprecht, G., Conference Series, Vol. 411, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII, ed. D. A. Bohlender, D. Durand, & P. Dowler, 251 -- + McLeod, B. A., Fabricant, D., Geary, J., Martini, P., Nystrom, G., Elston, R., Eikenberry, S. S., & Epps, H. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5492, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. A. F. M. Moorwood & M. Iye, 1306 -- 1313 Miller-Ricci, E., & Fortney, J. J. 2010, ApJ, 716, L74 Miller-Ricci, E., Seager, S., & Sasselov, D. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1056 Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., Zahnle, K., & Fortney, J. J. 2011, ApJ submitted, arXiv:1104.5477 & O'Brien, K. 2010, PASP, 122, 93 Nettelmann, N., Fortney, J. J., Kramm, U., & Redmer, R. 2011, ApJ, 733, 2 Rogers, L. A., & Seager, S. 2010a, ApJ, 712, 974 -- . 2010b, ApJ, 716, 1208 Sada, P. V., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, L215 Seifahrt, A., Kaufl, H. U., Zangl, G., Bean, J. L., Richter, M. J., & Siebenmorgen, R. 2010, A&A, 524, A11+ van Altena, W. F., Lee, J. T., & Hoffleit, E. D. 1995, The general catalogue of trigonometric [stellar] parallaxes, ed. van Altena, W. F., Lee, J. T., & Hoffleit, E. D. 13
1903.12116	1	1903	2019-03-28T17:01:33	An intense thermospheric jet on Titan	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Winds in Titan's lower and middle atmosphere have been determined by a variety of techniques, including direct measurements from the Huygens Probe over 0-150 km, Doppler shifts of molecular spectral lines in the optical, thermal infrared and mm ranges, probing altogether the ~100-450 km altitude range, and inferences from thermal field over 10 mbar - 10 -3 mbar (i.e. ~100-500 km) and from central flashes in stellar occultation curves. These measurements predominantly indicated strong prograde winds, reaching maximum speeds of ~150-200 m/s in the upper stratosphere, with important latitudinal and seasonal variations. However, these observations provided incomplete atmospheric sounding; in particular, the wind regime in Titan's upper mesosphere and thermosphere (500- 1200 km) has remained unconstrained so far. Here we report direct wind measurements based on Doppler shifts of six molecular species observed with ALMA. We show that unlike expectations, strong prograde winds extend up to the thermosphere, with the circulation progressively turning into an equatorial jet regime as altitude increases, reaching ~340 m/s at 1000 km. We suggest that these winds may represent the dynamical response of forcing by waves launched at upper stratospheric/mesospheric levels and/or magnetospheric-ionospheric interaction. We also demonstrate that the HNC distribution is restricted to Titan's thermosphere above ~870 km altitude.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	An intense thermospheric jet on Titan E. Lellouch1, M.A. Gurwell2, R. Moreno1, S. Vinatier1, D.F. Strobel3, A. Moullet4, B. Butler5, L. Lara6, T. Hidayat7, E. Villard8 1. LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France 2. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 3. Departments of Earth & Planetary Sciences and Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 4. SOFIA / USRA, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 5. National Radio Astronomical Observatory, Socorro, NM 87801, USA 6. 7. 8. Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia -- CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomia, E-18008 Granada, Spain Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia Joint ALMA Observatory, Alonso de Cordova, 3107 Vitacura, Santiago, Chile Winds in Titan's lower and middle atmosphere have been determined by a variety of techniques, including direct measurements from the Huygens Probe1 over 0-150 km, Doppler shifts of molecular spectral lines in the optical, thermal infrared and mm ranges2-4, probing altogether the ~100-450 km altitude range, and inferences from thermal field over 10 mbar - 10-3 mbar (i.e. ~100-500 km)5-6 and from central flashes in stellar occultation curves7-9. These measurements predominantly indicated strong prograde winds, reaching maximum speeds of ~150-200 m/s in the upper stratosphere, with important latitudinal and seasonal variations. However, these observations provided incomplete atmospheric sounding; in particular, the wind regime in Titan's upper mesosphere and thermosphere (500- 1200 km) has remained unconstrained so far. Here we report direct wind measurements based on Doppler shifts of six molecular species observed with ALMA. We show that unlike expectations, strong prograde winds extend up to the thermosphere, with the circulation progressively turning into an equatorial jet regime as altitude increases, reaching ~340 m/s at 1000 km. We suggest that these winds may represent the dynamical response of forcing by waves launched at upper stratospheric/mesospheric levels and/or magnetospheric-ionospheric interaction. We also demonstrate that the HNC distribution is restricted to Titan's thermosphere above ~870 km altitude. Observations of Titan were conducted on July 22 and August 18/19, 2016 with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA). The period corresponded to Titan's Northern late Spring (solar longitude~ 80°). Observations altogether covered a fraction of the 329-364 GHz range, by means of three scheduling blocks, each associated with a frequency setup (see details in Supplementary Information). ALMA was at that time in a moderately extended configuration (C40-5), providing angular resolutions of ~0.16-0.23" ("natural weighting"), to be compared to 1.0"-1.05" for Titan and its ~1000 km thick atmosphere. The spectra, taken at spectral resolutions of 1-2 MHz, include the rotational signatures of nine molecular species (CO, HCN, HNC, HC3N, CH3CN, C2H5CN, C2H3CN, CH3CCH and C3H8, some of them with several isotopologues), mostly present in emission due to their being formed in Titan's stratosphere. As expected based on radiative-transfer model calculations, spectral signatures (see examples in Supplementary Figure 2) are 1 best apparent at the limb, in relation with the gain in path and the decrease of the N2 continuum. In addition, as already seen in previous ALMA and other datasets4,10-11, most molecular emissions show non-uniform distributions across the disk. This results from the combined effects of latitudinal variations of temperature5-6 and composition and of the observing geometry. In this manner our data bear information of the 3D temperature and composition fields, complementing the Cassini results12-13 for some of the molecules (CO, HCN, HC3N, CH3CCH) and providing new information for the others. Six molecules (HCN, DCN, HNC, HC3N, CH3CN, and CH3CCH) were further observed at a high spectral resolution of ~60 kHz (~280 kHz for CH3CCH) in order to map their precise line-of-sight (LOS) central frequencies. As exemplified on Fig. 1 for HNC and CH3CN, strong blue (red) shifts are evident at beam positions centered on Titan's east (west) equatorial limbs at 425 km altitude. These shifts correspond to a beam-integrated limb- to-limb speed difference of ~490 m/s for HNC and ~400 m/s for CH3CN. This is much larger than Titan's solid rotation (16 m/s at 1000 km altitude) and implies very fast prograde winds. Maps of these Doppler winds are shown in Fig. 2 for all six species (including separate fits for the components of the HCN hyperfine triplet), based on Gaussian fits of the line central frequencies at all beam positions with sufficient line signal (see details in Supplementary Information). For most molecules, wind information is restricted to regions at or beyond the Titan limb, as emission features are too weak in nadir geometry. A prominent exception is CH3CN, for which the strong extended emission and the availability of three lines enable LOS wind measurements over the entire disk with an accuracy of ~6-8 m/s. For other molecules, LOS wind errors (at/beyond limb) are 6-8 m/s for HC3N and HCN, 12-20 m/s for HNC, and 30-50 m/s for the CH3CCH and DCN that exhibit weaker and broader lines. Very strong prograde winds are seen in all species, with maximum measured LOS winds of 250-350 m/s, and even the less precise CH3CCH and DCN winds confirm this picture. Fig. 2 reveals however differences in the wind regime from the different species. HNC LOS speeds are strongest at equator, forming a jet, with no hint for latitudinal asymmetry. In contrast, CH3CN winds are enhanced in the Southern (winter) hemisphere, as seen by the "widening" of the iso-wind contours when moving from South to North. None of the studied molecules shows convincing evidence for meridional or day-to-night flows, with upper limits estimated to be 25-30 m/s. Assigning altitudes/pressure levels to these wind measurements relies on the so-called contribution functions, themselves dependent on the local vertical distributions of temperature and abundances and the pointing geometry. Ultimately, this would require analyzing our entire dataset in terms of the atmospheric thermal/composition 3D field. For now, we calculated typical contribution functions for equatorial nadir and limb conditions. Details on the procedure, involving inversion techniques for temperatures and abundances, are given in Methods and Supplementary Information. Note that for species whose lines are mostly Doppler-broadened (HNC and HC3N), the classical inversion technique based on line profile was complemented by the limb sounding capabilities offered by the data. This novel approach provides us with the first determination of the HNC profile in Titan's atmosphere, found to be essentially restricted to thermospheric levels above ~870 km altitude. This has important implications for models14; in particular, the lack of HNC in the stratosphere suggests that Galactic Cosmic Rays play at most a minor role for Titan's HNC chemistry. 2 Equatorial profiles for all six species and the associated contribution functions are shown in Fig. 3. Together the various molecules probe the entire atmosphere above 150 km, encompassing the mesosphere (300-800 km) and thermosphere (> 800 km). The latter is best sounded by HNC which probes 900-1100 km, providing the first direct zonal wind measurement in that part of Titan's atmosphere. CH3CN, DCN and CH3CCH sound the upper stratosphere/lower mesosphere at 150-400 km, while, in relation with their steep slope and large thermospheric abundance, HCN (main line at 354.505 GHz) and HC3N sound a broad region roughly centered at ~700 km and extending 200-300 km above and below, as detailed in Methods. The difference in the sounded altitudes is consistent with the similarities/differences in the structure of the winds for the different molecules. Supplementary Figure 6 shows LOS winds as a function of projected distance from Titan's rotation axis. In spite of their larger uncertainties, winds inferred from DCN and CH3CCH have a similar structure as those from CH3CN. In contrast, HNC data show a distinct signature of high speed winds at large projected distances from the polar axis, corresponding to the equatorial jet outlined above. Winds derived from HC3N and HCN bear similar structures, that appear intermediate between the previous ones (i.e. stronger winds than those from CH3CN, but with a less prevalent jet compared to HNC). Simple fits of the LOS winds that assume solid-body rotation indicate that winds increase with altitude, from ~200 m/s equatorial at ~350 km to ~280-300 m/s at 600 km and above. The Richardson number associated with this wind profile remains comfortably above the Ri < ¼ limit for turbulence. Assuming purely zonal flow, we used our forward model and a trial-and-error approach to de-convolve the LOS winds measured in CH3CN, HNC and HC3N in terms of latitudinal wind profiles at the associated altitudes (see Supplementary Information). Results for CH3CN, which pertain to 345+60-140 km (0.01-0.7 mbar with peak sensitivity at 0.035 mbar) indicate a maximum 220 m/s speed at 15°S with, as expected from qualitative data inspection, a much more gradual decline in the Southern vs. Northern hemisphere. This result agrees within error bars with pioneering measurements4 using the same species (160±60 m/s equatorial at 300±100 km, assuming solid-body rotation). The north/south asymmetry that is evident in our CH3CN data also confirms the well-trusted but still indirect inferences based on temperature fields and the use of the thermal wind equation. Those consistently indicate a strong, broad mid-latitude (~20°-50°) jet in the winter hemisphere with peak velocities in excess of 190 m/s, extending over ~1 decade in pressure centered at 0.1 mbar, while significant winds (up to 100 m/s) are still present at mid-latitudes of the opposite hemisphere5-6. Note that the thermal wind approach is valid only outside an altitude-dependent (but typically ± [10°-30°]) equatorial band, a limitation that does not hold in direct wind measurements. Analyses of stellar occultation central flashes in 2001-2003 (Northern winter solstice) also indicate maximum winds of ~200 m/s at 250 km, but disagree on their latitudinal extent7-9. For HC3N and HNC, the de-convolved equatorial speeds are 310-345 m/s, rapidly decreasing with latitude in both hemispheres and with no clear latitudinal asymmetry. For HC3N, results are sharply different from Ref. [4], both in the estimate in the probed altitude (710+190-260 km here vs 450±100 km in [4]) and in the wind velocities (310 m/s equatorial here, vs 60±20 m/s in [4]). As the data from [4] refer to 2003-2004 (solar longitude L =268°-280°), the contradiction -- if taken at face value -- would imply a temporal variation of the mesospheric circulation, with winds decreasing (resp. 3 increasing) with altitude at southern (resp. northern) summer solstice, or near perihelion (resp. aphelion). Based on INMS and CAPS/IBS data, ion winds at 1000-1400 km in the range 30-260 m/s (vector component along the spacecraft trajectory) were reported15. Above 1200 km, ions and neutrals are collisionally-coupled16, so these speeds represent neutral winds, but the measured range was broad and the other wind components unconstrained. Our HNC data reveal that the circulation regime over 900-1100 km is characterized by a relatively broad (±30-35° latitude extent at half maximum) equatorial jet with ~350 m/s maximum speed, i.e. ~1.4 times the speed of sound. Such a regime was previously unexpected. Pre-Cassini models17-18 predicted subsolar to anti-solar (SSAS) winds of ~50 m/s. Early Cassini/INMS density profiles were used19 to construct an empirical altitude-latitude temperature model; solving the momentum equations, a circulation pattern with a zonal jet of ~50 m/s and very strong meridional winds (~150 m/s) at 70°N latitude was inferred. A more complete analysis of 32 Cassini/INMS passes20 indicated that while mean temperatures over 1050-1500 km vary over 112-175 K, there is a conspicuous lack of correlation between temperatures, latitude, longitude, local time, and solar zenith angle, indicating that the thermospheric thermal structure and dynamics are not primarily controlled by the absorption of solar EUV. Some correlations were found between atmospheric temperatures and the local plasma environment21,20, but appear to be of ambiguous interpretation. An analysis of thermospheric energetics22 demonstrated that particle sources (magnetospheric ions, pick-up ions, and auroral electron precipitation) and Joule heating contribute lower power than EUV input -- typically by a factor 10 below 1100 km, and solar EUV also dominates ionospheric production23. But Saturn's co-rotation electric field that drives magnetospheric plasma convection past Titan at 120 km/s also likely drives ~1 km/s ion convection in the ionosphere24. Collisionally-coupled ion/neutral winds of ~350 m/s would appear sufficient to power perpendicular electric fields E⟂ = - v x B of order 1.5 µV/m, as inferred25. Vertically propagating waves seem capable of depositing energy fluxes comparable to solar UV [Ref. 22]. Evidence for waves in Titan's mesosphere and thermosphere is abundantly present in stellar occultation profiles9, in the Huygens/HASI profile26 above 500 km, and in the INMS density/temperature profiles22,27, and maybe in vertical molecular profiles. Gravitational tides28 are not promising for explaining the strong wind speeds we measure, due to their small phase velocities (0 and ± 5.9 m/s equatorial) and inability to penetrate regions where their phase speed equals the zonal velocity (i.e. between 0-5 km and the 70-80 km region of minimum wind1). Above 300 km altitude where the radiative time constant becomes shorter than a Titan day29 (= 16 Earth days), other gravity waves, in particular thermal tides generated by solar heating, diurnal and especially semi-diurnal with large vertical wavelength30,31, will propagate vertically. They can deposit eddy momentum fluxes by viscous dissipation, interact with the weak solar- induced SSAS thermospheric circulation and produce a strong equatorial flow. Solar forcing of tides will be complex as a solar day for a parcel advecting with zonal winds is 16 days at the surface, approximately one day at 350 km and ~ 3/4 day at 1000 km. Detailed models are needed to assess the plausibility of the mechanism, but an analogy may hold with Venus' upper atmosphere, where gravity waves are thought to be responsible for the variable retrograde super-rotating zonal flow that superimposes to the strong SSAS regime32. 4 References 1. Folkner, W.M., et al. Winds on Titan from ground-based tracking of the Huygens probe. J. Geophys. Res. 111, E07S02 (2006). 2. Luz, D., et al. Characterization of the zonal winds in Titan's stratosphere of Titan with UVES: 2. Observations coordinated with the Huygens Probe entry. J. Geophys. Res. 111, E08S90 (2006). 3. Kostiuk, T. et al. High spectral resolution infrared studies of Titan: winds, temperature and composition. Planet. Space Sci 58, 1715-1723 (2010). 4. Moreno, R., Marten, A. & Hidayat T. Interferometric measurements of zonal winds on Titan. Astron. Astrophys. 437, 319-328 (2005). 5. Achterberg, R. K. et al. Titan's middle atmospheric temperatures and dynamics observed by the Cassini Composite Infrared Spectrometer. Icarus 194, 263-277 (2008). 6. Achterberg, R. K. et al. Temporal variations of Titan's middle atmospheric temperatures from 2004 to 2009 observed by the Cassini/CIRS. Icarus 211, 686-698 (2011). 7. Hubbard, W.B. et al. The occultation of 28Sgr by Titan. Astron. Astrophys. 269, 541-563 (2005). 8. Bouchez, A.H. Seasonal trends in Titan's atmosphere: haze, winds, and clouds. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology (2004) 9. Sicardy, B. et al. The two Titan stellar occultations of 14 November 2003. J. Geophys. Res. 111, E11S91 (2006). 10. Cordiner, M. et al. ALMA measurements of the HNC and HC3N distributions in Titan's atmosphere. Astrophys. J. Lett. 795, L30, 6 pp. (2014) 11. Lai, J. C.-Y. et al. Mapping vinyl cyanide and other nitriles in Titan's atmosphere using ALMA Astronomical J. 154, L206, 10 pp. (2017). 12. Vinatier, S. et al. Vertical abundance profiles of hydrocarbons in Titan's atmosphere at 15°S and 80°N retrieved from Cassini/CIRS spectra. Icarus 188, 120-138 (2007). 13. Teanby, N. et al. Vertical profiles of HCN, HC3N and C2H2 in Titan's atmosphere derived from Cassini/CIRS data. Icarus 186, 364-384 (2007). 14. Dobrijevic, M., Loison, J.-C., Hickson, K. M. & Gronoff, G. 1D-coupled photochemical model of neutrals, cations and anions in the atmosphere of Titan. Icarus 268, 313-339 (2016). 15. Crary, F. J., Magee, B. A., Mandt, K., Waite, J. H., Westlake, J., Young, D. T. Heavy ions, temperatures and winds in Titan's ionosphere: Combined Cassini CAPS and INMS observations. Planet. Space Sci. 57, 1847-1856 (2009). 16. Cravens, T. et al. Dynamical and magnetic field time constants for Titan's ionosphere: Empirical estimates and comparisons with Venus. J. Geophys. Res. 115, A08319 (2010). 17. Rishbeth, H., Yelle, R.V. & Mendillo, M. Dynamics of Titan's thermosphere. Planet. Space Sci 48, 51-58 (2000). 18. Müller-Wodarg, I.C.F., Yelle, R. V., Mendillo, M. & Aylward, A.D. On the global distribution of neutral gases in Titan's upper atmosphere and its effect on the thermal structure. J. Geophys. Res. 108, A12, id 1453 (2003). 19. Müller-Wodarg, I. C. F., Yelle, R. V., Cui, J. & Waite, J. H. Horizontal structures and dynamics of Titan's thermosphere J. Geophys. Res. 113, E10, id 10005 (2008). 20. Snowden, D., Yelle, R. V., Cui, J., Wahlund, J.-E., Edberg, N. J. T., Ågren, K. The thermal structure of Titan's upper atmosphere, I: Temperature profiles from Cassini INMS observations. Icarus 226, 552-582 (2013). 21. Westlake, J. H. et al. Titan's thermospheric response to various plasma environments. J. Geophys. Res. 116, A3, id A03318 (2011). 22. Snowden, D. & Yelle, R. V. The thermal structure of Titan's upper atmosphere, II: Energetics. Icarus 228 64-77 (2014). 23. Ågren, K., Wahlund, J.-E., Garnier, P., Modolo, R., Cui, J., Galand, M., Müller-Wodarg, I. On the ionospheric structure of Titan. Planet. Space Sci. 57, 1821-1827 (2009). 24. Ulusen, D et al. Comparisons of Cassini flybys of the Titan magnetospheric interaction with an MHD model: evidence for organized behavior at high altitudes. Icarus, 217, 43-54 (2012). 25. Ågren, K, et al. Detection of currents and associated electric fields in Titan's ionosphere from Cassini data. J. Geophys. Res. 116, A04313 (2011). 26. Aboudan, A., Colombatti, G., Ferri, F. & Angrilli, F. Huygens probe entry trajectory and attitude estimated simultaneously with Titan's atmospheric structure by Kalman filtering. Planet. Space Sci. 56, 573-585 (2008). 27. Müller-Wodarg I. C. F., Yelle, R. V., Borggren, N. & Waite, J. H. Waves and horizontal structures and dynamics of Titan's thermosphere J. Geophys. Res. 111, A12, id A12315 (2006). 5 28. Strobel, D.F. Gravitational tidal waves in Titan's upper atmosphere. Icarus 182, 251-258 (2006). 29. Bézard, B., Vinatier, S., & Achterberg, R. Seasonal radiative transfer modeling of Titan's stratospheric temperatures at low latitudes. Icarus 302, 437-450 (2018). 30. Fels, S.B. & Lindzen, R.S. The interaction of thermally excited gravity waves with mean flows. Geophys. Fluid Dyn. 6, 149-191. (1974) 31. Zhu, X. Maintenance of equatorial superrotation in the atmosphere of Venus and Titan. Planet Space Sci. 54, 761-773 (2006) 32. Hoshino, N., Fujiwara, H., Takagi, M. & Kasaba, Y. Effects of gravity waves on the day-night difference of the general circulation in the Venusian lower thermosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 118, 2004-2015 (2013). 33. Thelen, A. et al. Abundance measurements of Titan's stratospheric HCN, HC3N, C3H4 and CH3CN from ALMA observations. Icarus 319, 417-432 (2019). Corresponding author: Emmanuel Lellouch. LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France. [email protected]; 33-1-45077672. Acknowledgements E.L., R.M., and SV acknowledge support from the Programme National de Planétologie (PNP-INSU). We thank Agustín Sánchez-Lavega and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments. The paper is dedicated to the memory of Daniel Lellouch, deceased on February 13, 2019. Author Contributions M.G. wrote the ALMA proposal. M.G. and R.M. reduced the ALMA data. E.L. analyzed and modelled the data (with contribution from R.M.) and wrote most of the manuscript. S.V. provided initial thermal profiles as well as insight in the general science context. D.F.S. led the interpretative part. All authors discussed the manuscript. Materials requests & Correspondence should be addressed to the corresponding author. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. 6 Fig. 1. Evidence for zonal winds. CH3CN (left) and HNC (right) line profiles at Titan East (+0.425", 0" from disk center) and West (-0.425",0" from disk center) limbs, observed on August 18, 2016. These pointings correspond to a radial distance of ±3000 km from disk center (i.e. a limb tangent altitude of 425 km above the surface). The reference zero frequencies are the rest frequencies of the CH3CN J, K=18,1 line (349.44699 GHz) and HNC (4-3) line (362.63030 GHz) respectively. The left panel also includes the CH3CN J, K=18,0 line at 349.45370 GHz. The limb-to-limb velocity difference is ~400 m/s for CH3CN and ~490 m/s for HNC. 7 Fig. 2. Doppler wind maps. Line-of-sight Doppler shifts (m/s) measured in CH3CN, CH3CCH, DCN, HCN (main line of the hyperfine triplet at 354.5055 GHz and satellite lines at 354.5039 and 354.5075 GHz), HC3N, and HNC. Right Ascensions (RA) and declinations are shown in terms of Titan's apparent radius. Ellipses show the synthetized beams. White areas correspond to regions where emission signals are too faint for reliable measurements to be performed. Only CH3CN emission makes it possible to measure winds throughout the disk. Some measurements within the disk are also possible using the main HCN 354.5055 GHz line, that appears in absorption in nadir geometry (see Supplementary Figure 2). Doppler shifts in the various species clearly indicate a prograde wind regime, but with different structure for CH3CN vs HNC, HCN and HC3N. Winds in CH3CCH are mostly measurable outside of the low-latitude regions. Winds are only marginally detected from DCN emission, with 30-50 m/s error bars. See Supplementary Information for details. 8 Fig. 3. Molecular abundance profiles and probed altitudes. Left: Equatorial vertical profiles for the six species used for the wind measurements (solid lines, with error bars indicated in the altitude ranges where information is available). As explained in Supplementary Information, uncertainties on HNC and on the upper part of the HC3N distribution are best described by a vertical shift of their altitude profile (dashed lines). For HCN, HC3N and CH3CCH, characteristic profiles from Cassini/CIRS, UVIS and INMS, and from previous 2012-2015 ALMA observations (Thelen et al. 2019, Ref. [33]) are indicated. See Methods and Supplementary Information for details. Right: Wind contribution functions (WCF) in limb (solid lines) and nadir (dashed lines) geometries. For HCN, WCF are shown separately for the main line at 354.5055 GHz and for the satellite lines at 354.5039 and 354.5075 GHz (averaging the two). For HC3N, to avoid the contribution from the nearby HCN (4-3) line, a WCF calculated with zero HC3N has been subtracted from the WCF before plotting. For other species, the peak below 100 km is due to the continuum. See Methods for details. 9 Methods 1) Radiative transfer models Spectral calculations were based on a home-made radiative transfer model in full spherical geometry, inherited from [4, 34, 35]. Line opacities are calculated using spectroscopic parameters from the Cologne Database for Molecular Spectroscopy (CDMS, https://www.astro.uni-koeln.de/cdms). As a consequence of small particle size and sharply decreasing absorption coefficients beyond 100 µm36, thermal emission and scattering by haze are neglected, as in all previous studies of Titan at mm/submm wavelengths. Pencil-beam radiances are calculated on a grid of impact parameters (distance to Titan center) ranging from 0 to 4120 km (1.6 Titan radius). For each beam position under study, line-of-sight radiances as a function of impact parameter from Titan's center are re-interpolated over the Titan + atmosphere disk, and integrated over portions of the disk intercepted by the ALMA synthesized beam. At this step, we took into account the beam's elliptical shape and its orientation, and the precise apparent radius of Titan for each individual observation. This resulted in synthetic spectra expressed in Jy/beam which could then be directly compared to the data, after applying whenever needed minor (< 10 %) model-based calibration corrections to the data fluxes. 2) Temperature and abundance retrievals Temperature profile information was derived from modelling of the CO (3-2) and HCN (4- 3) lines and their isotopic variants, using a home-made inversion code35 and based on optimal estimation methods principles37-38. For the purpose of this task, which is mainly to assign altitude levels to the wind measurements, we focused on the equatorial region, leaving the study of the thermal and compositional field for future work. For the a priori, we used an equatorial profile derived from Cassini/CIRS measurements in May 2016 (T119 flyby), extended above 700 km at a 153 K temperature, typical of the upper atmosphere according to Cassini / INMS measurements, and shown in Supplementary Figure 1 (black line). While CO lines constrain atmospheric temperatures below ~350 km, HCN probes much higher altitudes (up to ~1000 km), with the difficulty that the temperature profile and the HCN profile are poorly constrained above the top of the sensitivity range of CIRS (~520 km). To alleviate the ambiguity between abundance and temperature effects in the core of the HCN (4-3) line, we inverted simultaneously the equatorial HCN (4-3) and H13CN (4-3) lines near the central meridian and at the limb. Indeed, the characteristic absorption / emission appearance of the HCN hyperfine structure in nadir / limb geometry provides complementary information on temperature and abundance sensitivity. In doing so, we used the HCN profile from Ref. [39] (extended above 400 km to reach HCN = 10-4 at 800 km and above) as a priori. The best fit equatorial thermal profile retrieved in this manner is shown in Supplementary Figure 1 (blue line), and the associated fits of the CO, HCN and H13CN lines in nadir and limb geometry are shown in Supplementary Figure 2. The temperature profile shows a marked mesopause at 140 K near 800 km. The occurrence of such a cold temperature somewhere above the stratopause is in fact directly implied by the depth of the main component of the HCN (4-3) hyperfine structure, with a brightness 10 temperature of 143 K in the line core in nadir geometry. Note also that the best fit temperature / HCN profile permits a good match of the HCN v2=1 emission at 354.460 GHz (Supplementary Figures 2 and 3). The retrieved profile is also warmer than the a priori (CIRS) profile by up to ~3 K at 250 km and colder by ~6 K at 400-600 km. Differences between CIRS- and ALMA CO-derived thermal profiles of up to 5 K below 300 K have already been noted40. Error bars on the retrieved HCN/temperature retrievals are a combination of (i) uncertainties due to measurement noise and (ii) uncertainties due to the a priori used in the inversion process. Noise-related uncertainties were calculated using the formalism described in Ref. [37] (their eq. 23 and 24). The associated temperature errors are formally very small (0.2-0.3 K) in relation to the high S/N and high spectral-resolution of the data. Uncertainties due to the a priori were evaluated by repeating the temperature/HCN inversion process using several a priori temperature and HCN profiles, as detailed in Supplementary Information. These modelling variants yielded a suite of solution profiles, whose dispersion is a good indicator on the actual error bars on the retrieved temperature and HCN profile (Supplementary Figure 4). Beyond the well- known characteristics of Titan's middle atmosphere thermal structure such as the stratopause near 270 km, robust new features of all retrieved profiles are (i) the existence of a quasi-isothermal region over 450-600 km (already apparent in the CIRS-based a priori) and (ii) the existence of a ~140 K mesopause, located at 800±50 km altitude depending on the a priori. Error bars on the retrieved temperatures remain below 2-3 K up to 800 km; above this level they increase with the progressive lack of sensitivity of the measurements to ultimately reflect the a priori errors. The HCN profile (Fig. 3) is also very well defined (to within ~10-20 %) over 100-850 km, before error bars progressively increase. The nominal HCN mixing profile we determine reaches a 6.3 x 10-4 mixing ratio at 1000 km, in agreement with results from both Cassini/INMS41 and Cassini/UVIS42, respectively above and below 950 km (see Fig. 3). The retrieved thermal profile shows a quasi-isothermal part at 156 K over 450-600 km and a 140 K minimum near 800 km. Although the resulting oscillatory structure may be reminiscent of the temperature perturbations seen in the Huygens/HASI data26, its attribution to a wave is doubtful because (1) our data sample broad regions (beam size ~1000 km), and nadir and limb data inverted simultaneously are distant by ~2500 km (2) the resulting wave amplitude and vertical wavelength would be ~5-10 K and ~300 km, respectively smaller and larger than in the HASI data (~10-20 K and ~100 km). Instead, the temperature profile, and in particular the 800 km temperature minimum, may be mostly radiatively-controlled. A pioneering non-LTE model43 of Titan's upper atmosphere predicted a 135-140 K mesopause (but at 600 km), primarily due to C2H6 cooling. Revising such a model in the light of new distributions derived from Cassini and the present work (especially for HCN, C2H6, HC3N and CH3CN) and with updated spectroscopic databases would shed further light on this issue. The retrieved thermal profile was then used to derive the other molecular profiles, again for the equatorial region. The DCN profile was taken as the retrieved HCN profile, multiplied by a constant DCN/HCN ratio of (2.5±0.2) x 10-4 [44], i.e. assuming that the DCN profile follows that of HCN at all altitudes. CH3CN and CH3CCH were inverted using a priori profiles respectively based on ground-based data39 (extended to 10-5 at 1000 km and above) and CIRS observations45. For these three species, best fits of the (west) limb 11 equatorial emission are presented in Supplementary Figure 3. Error bars on CH3CN and CH3CCH reflect the combined effects of noise, temperature profile uncertainty and a priori errors. The Doppler-limited line-shape of HNC J=4-3 line (Supplementary Figure 5) contains limited information on the HNC vertical profile, except for the fact that this precludes HNC to be present at too deep atmospheric levels. Based on HNC J=6-5, ref. [34] found that for constant mixing profiles above some level, the cutoff altitude cannot be lower than 300 km. Using HNC data averaged over a concentric ring 2000-3350 km from Titan center, and testing photochemical profiles14 for HNC, we found that several of these HNC profiles overestimate the amount of HNC in the lower stratosphere. In contrast, the model in which the production of HNC by Galactic Cosmic Ray impact is omitted is essentially in agreement with the observed spectrum. While this line shape-based approach does not constrain the distribution of HNC at altitudes above the pressure-broadening levels, the latter can be determined from the observed variation of the line-integrated intensities with radial distance. Comparing the latter with model calculations for constant HNC profiles above some cutoff altitudes, we found that the bulk of HNC is located above 870±40 km altitude, implying that HNC is mostly a thermospheric species. The photochemical model from Ref. [14] without GCR also provides the correct radial dependence for the HNC emission, and was adopted as nominal profile, allowing for a vertical shift of ±40 km in its altitude scale. The situation is similar for the HC3N J=39-38 emission at 354.697 GHz, which -- except in the high-northern and southern latitude regions where it is strongly enhanced -- does not show Lorentzian wings. We performed the same study as for HNC on the radial distance variation of the HC3N emission (using the slightly stronger J=38-37 line at 345.609 GHz observed along with CO (3-2)), restricting ourselves to low-latitude regions. Considering piecewise profiles, this approach yielded a best fit cutoff altitude of 630±30 km (Supplementary Figure 5), implying that HC3N too is mostly present in Titan's upper atmosphere, albeit less so than HNC. This is not surprising given that HC3N, as measured by CIRS12-13 has also a measurable abundance in Titan's stratosphere and lower mesosphere, with mixing ratios increasing from 6x10-11 -- 1x10-7 over 150-450 km. Initializing the HC3N profile at these values and a large abundance at z > 800 km, we determined an equatorial HC3N profile fitting both the shape of the J=39-38 line and the radial variation of the J=38-37 lines fluxes. In contrast, the nominal HC3N profile from Ref. [14] does not fit well any of either constraint, indicating that this profile is overabundant at lower altitudes and under-abundant in the upper atmosphere. Our HC3N solution profile has a 1000 km abundance as high as ~5 x 10-5. This agrees rather well with the global value reported from Cassini/INMS46 and with the Cassini/UVIS HC3N abundance over 850-950 km [42]. We reiterate that our conclusions pertain to the equatorial HC3N profile only. Fig. 3 summarizes the retrieved profiles for all six molecules used to probe the winds. Error bars are indicated in the range where information is available. For HNC and HC3N, uncertainties are best expressed as a vertical shift of ±40 km and ±30 km in the profiles, for reasons explained above. These profiles are compared to characteristic profiles locally derived from Cassini/UVIS at 6°S (T41I, Ref. [42]), INMS41,46, and CIRS. For the latter, we show HCN and CH3CCH profiles at 9°S from May 2016 (T119, Ref. [45]); for HC3N, not clearly detected in the latter observations, we use instead a 5°N profile from Jan. 2007 12 (T23, Ref. [47]). Also shown in Fig. 3 are disk-averaged HCN and HC3N profiles derived from 2012- 2015 ALMA observations (Ref. [33], their Fig. 10). Fig. 3 highlights the overall agreement between these profiles, giving in particular great confidence in our HCN and HC3N profiles in the middle/upper atmosphere. A noteworthy difference is that "local" molecular profiles (from Cassini CIRS and UVIS) show small-scale vertical variations (see e.g. Figs. 3- 4 of Ref. [47], and Fig. 26 of Ref. [42]), not predicted in photochemical models14 and presumably of dynamical origin; those are particularly visible in Fig. 3 for the HCN and HC3N profiles derived from UVIS. 3) Contribution functions and wind altitudes The retrieved profiles for all six molecules used to probe the winds are shown in Fig. 3 (left panel). Based on these profiles, "wind contribution functions" were calculated to estimate the range of altitudes probed by the wind measurements in each molecule. For this, we first calculated "traditional" contribution functions B(T) ∂exp(-τ) / ∂ln(p), both monochromatically (over a spectral interval matching the one used for the wind measurements), and for every pencil-beam line-of-sight. At each frequency, these contributions functions were then convolved with the synthetized beam associated to each observation. To estimate how the probed altitude may vary with the observing geometry, these spatially-convolved -- but still monochromatic -- contribution functions were calculated both in nadir view (i.e. pointing to Titan's disk center) and in limb view, defined here as a position distant from Titan's center by 1.3 Titan radius (i.e. 772.5 km above the solid planet limb). This corresponds typically to the distance where we measure strongest winds before signals get too faint. Finally, these spatially-convolved contribution functions were spectrally convolved, using a weight proportional to the local spectral slope of the synthetic spectrum48,4. For each species, these wind contribution functions (WCF) for the nadir and limb geometries are shown in the right panel of Fig. 3. For HCN, we show separately the WCF for the main line at 354.5055 GHz and for the two satellite lines at 354.5039 and 354.5075 GHz (averaging their two very similar WCF). Wind contribution functions highlight three regions: (i) a narrow (900-1100 km) thermospheric region probed by HNC (ii) another relatively narrow region, encompassing the upper stratosphere / lower mesosphere (200-400 km) probed by CH3CN, CH3CCH, and DCN (iii) a much broader zone, straddling from ~400 to ~1000 km (in limb geometry), probed by HCN and HC3N. In limb geometry, the mean probed altitudes (i.e. the WCF-weighted mean altitude) are: 345+60 -140 km for CH3CN; 315+90 -160 km for CH3CCH; 340+90 -155 km for DCN; 745+365 -320 km for the main HCN line; 540+120 -185 km for the HCN satellite lines; 710+190 -260 km for HC3N; and 990+100 -120 km for HNC, where the "error bars" mark the vertical extent of each WCF, i.e. the range in which it exceeds ½ of its maximum value. The impact of the thermal profile and abundance uncertainties (see Supplementary Information) on the wind contribution function (WCF) are small. Specifically, the mean probed altitude, as defined above, shifts by ±45 km for HNC, ±20 km for HC3N, ±25 km (resp. ±15 km) for the main (resp. the satellite) HCN line, and ±10 km for CH3CN, CH3CCH and DCN. Thus, except to some degree for HNC, the associated error bar appears dwarfed by the broad vertical extent of the WCF, from which we conclude that the vertical scale associated with our wind measurements is robust. 13 Wind contributions functions calculated by [4] for Plateau de Bure interferometer observations of CH3CN and HC3N lines at 220 GHz indicated sounding altitudes of 300±150 km for CH3CN and 450±100 km for HC3N. This compares well with our computation for CH3CN but is rather different for HC3N. This stems from the combination of three factors, all of which "pushing" the contribution function to higher levels in our case: (i) a higher HC3N abundance in the upper atmosphere compared to the profile39 adopted in Ref. [4] (ii) the fact that we calculated the WCF for pointing towards a distance of 1.3 Titan radius (vs 1.0 Titan radius in [4]), and (ii) the ~3 times smaller synthesized beam in our observations (~0.2" vs 0.6"), which enhances the contribution of limb with respect to nadir, thereby tending to probe higher altitudes. Data availability The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the ALMA archive (http://almascience.nrao.edu/aq/) and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Code availability Novel methods developed for this research and not available from previous studies are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Additional references 34. Moreno, R. et al. First detection of hydrogen isocyanide (HNC) in Titan's atmosphere. Astron. Astrophys. 536, id. L12, 4 pp. (2011). 35. Lellouch, E. et al. Detection of CO and HCN in Pluto's atmosphere with ALMA. Icarus 286, 289-307 (2017). 36. Anderson, C.M. & Samuelson, R.E. Titan's aerosol and stratospheric ice opacities between 18 and 500 μm: Vertical and spectral characteristics from Cassini CIRS. Icarus 212, 762-778 (2011). 37. Conrath, B.J., Gierasch, P.J., Ustinov, E.A. Thermal structure and para hydrogen fraction on the outer planets from voyager IRIS measurements. Icarus 135, 501 -- 517 (1998). 38. Rodgers, C.D. Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding: theory and practice. Vol. 2. World Scientific, Singapore (2000). 39. Marten, A., Hidayat, T., Biraud, Y., Moreno, R. New millimeter heterodyne observations of Titan: vertical distributions of nitriles: HCN, HC3N, CH3CN, and the isotopic ratio 15N/14N in its atmosphere. Icarus 158, 532 -- 544 (2002). 40. Thelen, A. E. et al. Spatial variations in Titan's atmospheric temperature: ALMA and Cassini comparisons from 2012 to 2015. Icarus 307, 380-390 (2018). 41. Cui, J., Cao, Y.-T., Lavvas, P. P., Koskinen, T. T. The variability of HCN in Titan's upper atmosphere as implied by the Cassini Ion-Neutral Mass Spectrometer measurements. Astrophys. J. Lett. 826, L5, 6pp (2016). 42. Koskinen, T. T., Yelle, R. V., Snowden, D. S., Lavvas, P., Sandel, B. R., Capalbo, F. J., Benilan, Y., West, R. A. The mesosphere and lower thermosphere of Titan revealed by Cassini/UVIS stellar occultations. Icarus 207, 511-534 (2011). 43. Yelle, R.V. Non-LTE models of Titan's upper atmosphere. Ap. J. 383, 380-400 (1991). 44. Molter, E.M. et al. ALMA observations of HCN and its isotopologues on Titan. Astron. J. 152, id. 42, 7 pp. (2016). 45. Vinatier, S. et al. Seasonal variations in Titan's stratosphere observed with Cassini/CIRS during northern spring. American Astronomical Society, DPS meeting #49, id.304.03 (2017). 46. Cui, J., et al. Analysis of Titan's neutral upper atmosphere from Cassini Ion Neutral Mass Spectrometer measurements Icarus 200, 581-615 (2009). 47. Vinatier, S. et al. Analysis of Cassini/CIRS limb spectra of Titan acquired during the nominal mission. I. Hydrocarbons, nitriles and CO2 vertical mixing ratio profiles. Icarus, 205, 559-570 (2010). 48. Lellouch, E., Goldstein, J.J., Rosenqvist, J., Bougher, S.W., Paubert, G. Global circulation, thermal structure, and carbon monoxide distribution in Venus' mesosphere in 1991. Icarus 110, 315-339 (1994). 14 Supplementary Information for: An intense thermospheric jet on Titan E. Lellouch, M.A. Gurwell, R. Moreno, S. Vinatier, D.F. Strobel, A. Moullet, B. Butler, L. Lara, T. Hidayat, E. Villard correspondence to: [email protected] 1) Observations and data reduction We observed Titan as the focus of Cycle 3 program 2015.1.01023.S (PI. M. Gurwell). Titan was observed in three scheduling blocks (SB) named (A-C), one of them being scheduled on July 22, 2016 and the other two consecutively on August 18/19, 2016. The quasars J1634-2058 and J1626-2951 were used for phase calibration and flux calibration. All three scheduling blocks made use of Band 7 receiver sets, altogether covering large portions of the 329-364 GHz range. We employed a range of spectral resolutions. Typically, moderate 1-2 MHz resolutions were used to capture profiles of broad lines such as CO and HCN, while being also well suited to weak emissions. Higher resolutions (61 -- 282 kHz) were also used, to study narrow yet strong lines, in particular, HNC, HC3N, and the HCN hyperfine structure core, and with the intent of measuring winds from Doppler shifts. The on-source time was 49 min for each of the scheduling blocks. 38 antennas were active in July 2016 and 39 in August. Observing conditions were good (H2O = 0.44-0.66 mm) resulting in rms noise of 2.0 mJy/beam/MHz. Observing details are given in Supplementary Table 1. Data reduction was initially carried out under CASA. Once calibrated visibilities were produced, deconvolution and imaging were performed under both the CASA and GILDAS environments. Self-calibration was performed to improve imaging quality, and the data were finally re-gridded on 0.02" or 0.05" pixel grids, expressing the spectral axis in Titan's rest frame. The achieved angular resolution ("natural weighting") varies from almost circular ~0.17" to more elongated 0.29" x 0.20" beams, as detailed in Supplementary Table 1. Titan's 5150-km diameter subtended 0.7594" and 0.7283" in the sky for the July and August observations respectively, and coordinate scales for maps were expressed in units of Titan's radius. For both periods, the sub-earth latitude was 26.0° and the North polar angle 3.45°. 15 Supplementary Table 1: Observational summary Date (UT) at start Tint (min) ∆ (au)1 Sub- earth long. Spectral range (GHz) Spectral resolution (MHz) 1.13 Synthesized beam (major, minor, orientation2) 0.29"x 0.20" PA=-85° 0.29"x 0.20" PA=-86° 0.26"x 0.19" PA=-81° 0.28"x 0.19" PA=-81° 0.23"x0.16", PA=91° 0.23"x0.16", PA=91° 0.22"x0.15", PA=90° 0.22"x0.15", PA=90° 0.22"x0.15", PA=90° 0.18"x0.16", PA=80° 0.18"x0.16", PA=80° 0.17"x0.16", PA=74° 0.17"x0.16", PA=75° 0.17"x0.16", PA=72° 329.063-330.937 330.826-332.700 1.13 341.448-341.917 (CH3CCH J=19-18) 342.263-343.196 0.282 0.98 349.161-349.626 0.25 349.419-349.474 (CH3CN J=19-18) 362.018-362.073 (DCN J=4-3) 362.602-362.657 (HNC J=4-3) 361.948-363.815 0.0625 0.0625 0.0625 1.0 342.363-344.136 1.13 344.063-345.936 1.13 354.477-354.534 (HCN J=4-3) 354.260-356.125 354.677- 354.737 (HC3N J=39-38) 0.061 1.95 0.061 SB C July 2:23 22 9.3508 319° 49 B August 9.7504 230° 49 18 23:48 A August 19 1:16 9.7512 230° 49 1 Geocentric distance 2 Polar angle of beam major axis Entries in bold face indicate data used for wind measurements 16 2) Doppler wind measurements Wind measurements were obtained from inspection of Doppler shifts on each individual spectra in the maps. For this, we performed Gaussian fits (the sum of a Gaussian and a 1st or 2nd degree polynomial) of the line profiles in their central parts, over ranges depending on the linewidth for each species. The fitting interval was ± [1.875 MHz] for HNC and HC3N and ± [3.75 MHz] for DCN. For HCN, which shows hyperfine structure, the spectrum was fit over ± [3.6 MHz] from the main component at 354.5055 GHz, by the sum of three Gaussians, in order to independently determine Doppler shifts for both the main component and for the two satellite lines at 354.5039 and 354.5075 GHz. For CH3CN, we performed separate fits for the three lines at 349.427, 349.447 and 349.454 GHz, considering each time a ± [2.5 MHz] interval. Results were very similar for each line, and then averaged over the three lines. For CH3CCH, due to lower line contrasts, we first created at each beam position a fictitious "total" line, by realigning the spectra successively on the five strongest lines of the 341.7 GHz multiplet (i.e., the 341.637, 341.682, 341.715, 341.735, and 341.741 GHz lines), and averaging them with weights proportional to the individual line strengths. The resulting "total" line was then fit for its position over a ± [8.5 MHz] interval. Wind measurements were obtained in this manner at all points of the map where the spectra showed sufficient emission signals for the Gaussian fits to be meaningful. Depending on the species, this was possible when the line signal exceeded 10 to 35 % of its maximum value on the map. As a result, wind measurements are usually reliable on a more or less extended region centered on the limb, an exception being CH3CN for which emission is also strongly detected at all nadir (disk-intercepting) beam positions, enabling wind maps on the entire Titan disk. For HCN, we also obtained some wind measurements within the disk using the main component of the hyperfine triplet, that appears in absorption against the disk (Supplementary Figure 2). To attribute error bars on the winds, we used a simple Monte-Carlo approach48. Residuals between the observed spectra and the Gaussian fits were used to estimate a rms noise level. Random noise at this level was then superimposed on the Gaussian model, which was then refit. Repeating this procedure 300 times, the dispersion in the fitted positions provided an estimate of the error bars on the LOS wind measurements. In the case of CH3CN, the error bars were further decreased by averaging the results on the three components. Wind maps for the 6 species are shown in Fig. 2. Typical error bars for measurements at/beyond the limb are 12-20 m/s on HNC, 6-8 m/s on HC3N, CH3CN, and the HCN main line, 10-12 m/s for the two HCN satellite lines, and 30-50 m/s on DCN and CH3CCH. Errors bars for LOS winds based on the HCN main line within the disk are ~20 m/s. 3) Temperature and abundance retrievals Temperature profile information was derived from modelling of the CO (3-2) and HCN (4- 3) lines and their isotopic variants, using a home-made inversion code35 and based on optimal estimation methods principles36-37. For the purpose of this task, which is mainly to assign altitude levels to the wind measurements, we focused on the equatorial region, leaving the study of the thermal and compositional field for future work. For the a priori, we used an equatorial profile derived from Cassini/CIRS measurements in May 2016 (T119 flyby), extended above 700 km at a 153 K temperature, typical of the upper atmosphere according to Cassini / INMS measurements, and shown in Supplementary 17 Figure 1 (black line). We first used the 12CO (3-2) and 13CO (3-2) lines observed at Equator and near the central meridian to retrieve the CO mixing ratio (48±1 ppm) and an intermediate-step thermal profile. The latter (red line in Supplementary Figure 1) deviates from the a priori only below ~350 km, marking the top of the sensitivity layer to CO. HCN probes much higher altitudes, however (up to ~1000 km), but the difficulty is that the temperature profile and the HCN profile are poorly constrained above the top of the sensitivity range of CIRS (~520 km). Thus in a second step, keeping the temperature profile fixed below 350 km, we performed a simultaneous inversion of the HCN (4-3) and H13CN (4-3) lines in terms of temperature and HCN profiles. We assumed a telluric-like HCN / H13CN ratio of 89, consistent with other measurements of carbon isotopes in Titan's atmosphere, and took the HCN profile from [39] (extended above 400 km to reach HCN = 10-4 at 800 km and above) as a priori. When doing so, to alleviate the ambiguity between abundance and temperature effects in the core of the HCN (4-3) line, we inverted simultaneously the equatorial HCN (4-3) and H13CN (4-3) lines near the central meridian and at the limb. Indeed, the characteristic absorption / emission appearance of the HCN hyperfine structure in nadir / limb geometry provides complementary information on temperature and abundance sensitivity. In practice, we used the west limb spectrum centered at RA, DEC = (0", -0.42") from Titan center, i.e. 400 km above Titan's solid surface limb, correcting for the wind Doppler shift before performing the inversion. The best fit equatorial thermal profile retrieved in this manner is shown in Supplementary Figure 1 (blue line), and the associated fits of the CO, HCN and H13CN lines in nadir and limb geometry are shown in Supplementary Figure 2. The temperature profile shows a marked mesopause at 140 K near 800 km. The occurrence of such a cold temperature somewhere above the stratopause is in fact directly implied by the depth of the main component of the HCN (4-3) hyperfine structure, with a brightness temperature of 143 K in the line core in nadir geometry. Note also that the best fit temperature / HCN profile permits a good match of the HCN v2=1 emission at 354.460 GHz (Supplementary Figures 2 and 3). The retrieved profile is also warmer than the a priori (CIRS) profile by up to ~3 K at 250 km and colder by ~6 K at 400-600 km. Understanding of these differences is deferred to future work, but we note for the time being that differences between CIRS- and ALMA CO-derived thermal profiles of up to 5 K below 300 K have been noted40. 18 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 A priori (Cassini T119, latitude = 1 N) A priori (Cassini T119, latitude = 1 N) A priori (Cassini T119, latitude = 1 N) A priori (Cassini T119, latitude = 1 N) A priori (Cassini T119, latitude = 1 N) A priori (Cassini T119, latitude = 1 N) A priori (Cassini T119, latitude = 1 N) After CO inversion After CO inversion After CO inversion After CO inversion After CO inversion After CO inversion After CO inversion 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 After CO and HCN inversion After CO and HCN inversion After CO and HCN inversion After CO and HCN inversion After CO and HCN inversion After CO and HCN inversion After CO and HCN inversion ) ) ) ) ) ) ) m m m m m m m k k k k k k k ( ( ( ( ( ( ( e e e e e e e d d d d d d d u u u u u u u t t t t t t t i i i i i i i t t t t t t t l l l l l l l A A A A A A A 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Temperature (K) Temperature (K) Temperature (K) Temperature (K) Temperature (K) Temperature (K) Temperature (K) Supplementary Figure 1. Thermal profiles. Equatorial thermal profiles used in this study. Black: a priori profile, based on Cassini/CIRS measurements. Error bars indicate the adopted a priori errors (see text). They are shown in dotted lines above the region constrained by Cassini/CIRS. Red: temperature profile retrieved from inversion of 12CO and 13CO. Blue: thermal profile retrieved from inversion of the HCN and H13CN limb and nadir data, using the red profile as a priori. Error bars on the retrieved profile include the propagation of the a priori errors on temperature and HCN (see text). This profile is then used to determine other molecular profiles and calculate contribution functions. Error bars on the retrieved HCN/temperature retrievals are a combination of (i) uncertainties due to measurement noise and (ii) uncertainties due to the a priori used in the inversion process. Noise-related uncertainties were calculated using the formalism described in Ref. [37] (their eq. 23 and 24). The associated temperature errors are formally very small (0.2-0.3 K) in relation to the high S/N and high spectral-resolution of the data. 19 ) ) m m a a e e b b / / y y J J ( ( x x u u F F l l ) ) m m a a e e b b / / y y J J ( ( x x u u F F l l 0.5 0.5 0.45 0.45 0.4 0.4 0.35 0.35 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.45 0.45 0.4 0.4 0.35 0.35 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.15 0.5 0.5 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.48 0.47 0.47 0.46 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.41 0.4 0.4 345.76 345.8 345.76 345.8 Nadir Nadir H13CN, HC3N, CO H13CN, HC3N, CO 345.3 345.3 345.5 345.5 345.7 345.7 345.9 345.9 Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) 0.52 0.52 0.5 0.5 0.48 0.48 0.46 0.46 0.44 0.44 0.42 0.42 0.4 0.4 0.38 0.38 0.36 0.36 354.5 354.5 354.52 354.52 Nadir Nadir HCN, HC3N HCN, HC3N 354.4 354.6 354.8 354.4 354.6 354.8 355 355 Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.4 0.4 0.35 0.35 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.26 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.2 0.2 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.14 345.76 345.8 345.76 345.8 Limb Limb H13CN, HC3N, CO H13CN, HC3N, CO 345.3 345.3 345.5 345.5 345.7 345.7 345.9 345.9 Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) Limb Limb HCN, HC3N HCN, HC3N 0.4 0.4 0.35 0.35 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.15 354.5 354.5 354.52 354.52 354.4 354.4 354.8 354.8 354.6 354.6 Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) 355 355 Supplementary Figure 2. Spectral fits for CO and HCN. Fits of the CO (3-2), HCN (4-3), and H13CN (4-3) lines at the equator and in nadir and limb geometries. The insets show the cores of CO (3-2) and HCN (4-3). Note also, mostly visible in limb geometry, the HCN v2 line at 354.460 GHz and the HC3N J=38-37 and J=39-38 lines at 345.609 and 354.697 GHz. The associated retrieved profile for HCN is shown in Fig. 3. 20 ) ) m m a a e e b b / / y y J J ( ( x x u u F F l l ) ) m m a a e e b b / / y y J J ( ( x x u u F F l l 0.32 0.32 0.3 0.3 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.2 0.2 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 Limb Limb HCN v2, HCN HCN v2, HCN Limb Limb CH3CN CH3CN 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05 354.4 354.4 354.45 354.45 354.5 354.5 354.55 354.55 349.2 349.2 349.3 349.3 349.4 349.4 349.5 349.5 Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) Limb Limb DCN DCN Limb Limb CH3CCH CH3CCH 0.15 0.15 0.145 0.145 0.14 0.14 0.135 0.135 0.13 0.13 0.125 0.125 0.12 0.12 0.115 0.115 0.11 0.11 362.03 362.03 362.04 362.04 362.05 362.05 362.06 362.06 341.5 341.5 341.6 341.6 341.7 341.7 341.8 341.8 Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) Supplementary Figure 3. Spectral fits for other species. Zoom of the HCN v2 line at 354.460 GHz and fits of CH3CN, DCN, and CH3CCH equatorial limb data. The associated retrieved profiles are shown in Fig. 3. To evaluate uncertainties due to the a priori, we repeated the temperature/HCN inversion process by using several a priori temperature and HCN profiles. For this, the first step was to construct a realistic range of initial temperatures profiles. As indicated above, we nominally used an equatorial profile derived from Cassini/CIRS measurements45 in May 2016. The formal uncertainty on this profile is < 1 K over 7.5 mbar - 0.025 mbar (100-350 km), increasing to ~ 2 K over 5 x 10-3 -- 1 x 10-3 mbar (430 - 520 km). As there are further systematic uncertainties on the CIRS-retrieved profile (e.g. related to the precise position of the CIRS detectors on the sky) at the level of ~1 K over 250-350 km, we conservatively adopted uncertainties increasing from 1 K at 100 km to 4 K at 630 km. Above this altitude, we adopted an a priori error that increases as log(pressure) to ~20 K at 1000 km and above. This choice was guided by (i) the observed dispersion in the INMS isothermal temperature measurements at 1050 -1500 km, which overall range from 112 K to 175 K around a mean temperature of 150 K over this altitude range (Ref. [20], Fig. 11), and by (ii) a similar dispersion in the few available temperature profiles from Cassini / UVIS (Ref.[42], Fig. 29). We note finally that temperatures at 1000 km from UVIS and HASI cluster around 180 K, vs 140 K for INMS; therefore, adopting a 153±20 K a priori temperature at 1000 km is reasonable. These a priori errors defined a set of three initial temperatures profiles for which the combined CO/HCN retrievals were performed (Supplementary Figure 1, black line with error bars). 21 We also studied the impact of using different a priori profiles for HCN. In practice, we used (a) HCN profiles enhanced or depleted from the nominal a priori39 by constant factor-of- 3 (b) an alternative a priori profile in which the HCN kept increasing with altitude up to 5x10-4 at 1000 km (matching the INMS41 and UVIS42 measurements near this altitude), allowing for a further factor-of-2 uncertainty in this profile. Altogether this provided six a priori HCN profiles which were also used (along with the nominal a priori temperature) for the inversion. Supplementary Figure 4. Sensitivity of retrievals to a priori temperature and HCN conditions. Retrieved temperature and HCN profiles for a suite of a priori temperature profiles (shown as the dashed lines in panel a) and a priori HCN profiles (dashed lines in panel d). The retrieved profiles are shown as solid lines with color codes corresponding to the a priori. The HCN (resp. temperature) a priori is also shown in panels (b) (resp. (c)) as a grey dashed line. These modelling variants yielded a suite of solution profiles, whose dispersion is a good indicator on the actual error bars on the retrieved temperature and HCN profile (Supplementary Figure 4). Beyond the well-known characteristics of Titan's middle atmosphere thermal structure such as the stratopause near 270 km, robust new features of all retrieved profiles are (i) the existence of a quasi-isothermal region over 450-600 km (already apparent in the CIRS-based a priori) and (ii) the existence of a ~140 K mesopause, located at 800±50 km altitude depending on the a priori. Error bars on the retrieved temperatures remain below 2-3 K up to 800 km; above this level they increase with the progressive lack of sensitivity of the measurements to ultimately reflect the a priori errors. The HCN profile (Fig. 3) is also very well defined (to within ~10-20 %) over 100-850 km, before error bars progressively increase. The robustness of the retrieved 22 HCN in previous ALMA observations to even factor >10 changes in the a priori was noted by [44] (their Fig. 2). The nominal HCN mixing profile we determine reaches a 6.3 x 10-4 mixing ratio at 1000 km, in agreement with results from both Cassini/INMS41 and Cassini/UVIS42, respectively above and below 950 km (see Fig. 3). The retrieved thermal profile was then used to derive the other molecular profiles, again for the equatorial region. The DCN profile was taken as the retrieved HCN profile, multiplied by a constant DCN/HCN ratio of (2.5±0.2) x 10-4 [44], i.e. assuming that the DCN profile follows that of HCN at all altitudes. CH3CN and CH3CCH were inverted using a priori profiles respectively taken from ground-based data39 (extended to 10-5 at 1000 km and above) and CIRS observations45. For these three species, best fits of the (west) limb equatorial emission are presented in Supplementary Figure 3. Error bars on CH3CN and CH3CCH reflect the combined effects of noise, temperature profile uncertainty and a priori errors. They were estimated by allowing for factor-of-2 variations in the a priori, and using also the warmest / coldest temperature profile when performing the inversion. The HNC J=4-3 line exhibits a purely Doppler-broadened profile (Supplementary Figure 5), and as such contains limited information on the HNC vertical profile, except for the fact that this precludes HNC to be present at too deep atmospheric levels. Based on HNC J=6- 5, Ref. [34] found that for constant mixing profiles above some level, the cutoff altitude cannot be lower than 300 km. We refined this conclusion by testing photochemical profiles14 for HNC. As the spatial distribution of HNC J=4-3 shows only mild latitudinal variations, we averaged the data over a concentric ring (0.285"-0.475", i.e. 2000-3350 km from Titan center) to improve S/N. We found (Supplementary Figure 5, top right) that several of the HNC models from Ref. [14], in particular the nominal one, overestimate the amount of HNC in the lower stratosphere, producing unobserved spectral wings. In contrast, the model in which the production of HNC by Galactic Cosmic Ray impact is omitted is essentially in agreement with the observed spectrum, requiring only a modest rescaling by a factor 1.15. Nonetheless, this line shape-based approach does not constrain the distribution of HNC at altitudes above the pressure-broadening levels. The latter can be determined by inspecting the observed variation of the line-integrated intensities with radial distance. Specifically, we compared the latter with model calculations for constant HNC profiles above some cutoff altitudes, using the nominal retrieved temperature profile (blue profile in Supplementary Figure 1). Supplementary Figure 5 (top left) shows the result, with cutoff altitudes of 600, 800, 1000, 1200 km, considering together all the HNC data. Too low (resp. too high) cutoff altitudes lead the models to predict an emission maximum at too small (resp. too large) radial distances. Part of the dispersion of the observational points in this panel is due to the spatial variation of the HNC emission. Repeating the exercise, both by (i) generating synthetic datasets with similar dispersion as the observed and (ii) splitting the HNC measurements in angular bins of 30° across the disk, provides a robustness test of the method and indicates that the bulk of HNC is located above 870±40 km altitude, implying that HNC is mostly a thermospheric species. Furthermore, Supplementary Figure 5 (top left) shows that the photochemical model from Ref. [14] without GCR also provides the correct radial dependence for the HNC emission. As this profile has more physical basis than a piecewise distribution, we adopt it as nominal profile, allowing for a vertical shift of ±40 km in its altitude scale (see Fig. 3). Using extreme temperature profiles does not change the altitude distribution of HNC by more than 10 km. 23 The situation is similar for the HC3N J=39-38 emission at 354.697 GHz, which -- except in the high-northern and southern latitude regions where it is strongly enhanced -- does not show Lorentzian wings. We performed the same study as for HNC on the radial distance variation of the HC3N emission (using the slightly stronger J=38-37 line at 345.609 GHz observed along with CO (3-2)), restricting ourselves to points of the maps having a declination offset within [± 0.2"], i.e. [± 0.55 Titan's radius] from disk center, in order to focus on the low-latitude regions. Fitting models in which HC3N is assumed to be uniformly mixed above some cutoff altitudes and again refitting synthetic datasets with an appropriate noise level indicates a best fit cutoff altitude of 630±30 km (Supplementary Figure 5, bottom left), implying that HC3N too is dominantly present in Titan's upper atmosphere, albeit less so than HNC. This is not surprising given that HC3N, as measured by CIRS12-13 has also a measurable abundance in Titan's stratosphere and lower mesosphere, with mixing ratios increasing from 6x10-11 -- 1x10-7 over 150-450 km. Initializing the HC3N profile at these values and a large abundance (2x10-4) at z > 800 km, we determined from inversion an equatorial HC3N profile fitting both the shape of the J=39-38 line at equatorial west limb and the radial variation of the line-integrated J=38- 37 lines fluxes. In contrast (Supplementary Figure 5, bottom right), the nominal HC3N profile from Ref. [14] does not fit any either of the two observables, indicating that this profile is overabundant at lower altitudes and under-abundant in the upper atmosphere. Our HC3N solution profile has a 1000 km abundance as high as ~5 x 10-5. This agrees rather well with the global value reported from Cassini/INMS46 (3.2 x 10-5 at 1025 km, after correction for possible effects of wall adsorption/desorption), and with the Cassini/UVIS HC3N abundance over 850-950 km [42]. We reiterate that our conclusions pertain to the equatorial HC3N profile only. 24 Supplementary Figure 5. Determination of the vertical profile of HNC and HC3N from combination of line shape (right panels) and radial dependence (left panels) information. Left panels: line-integrated fluxes (Jy-MHz per beam) for HNC (4-3) and HC3N (38-37) as a function of distance (in Titan radius) from Titan's center. For HNC, all points on the map are considered, while for HC3N, only low-latitude regions are considered (see text). These radial profiles are compared both with piecewise profiles (HNC or HC3N assumed to be uniformly mixed above some cutoff altitudes) and with inverted (HC3N) or physically-based profiles (models from Dobrijevic et al.14 for HNC and HC3N). HNC: For HNC, the piece-wise profiles have the following abundances: 1.6x10-7 above 600 km, 5.6x10-6 above 800 km, 1.25x10-4 above 1000 km and 2.0x10-3 above 1200 km. The models are shifted upwards by 0.05 units for clarity, and the "noise" in the models results from the non-circular beam. The best fit for piecewise models is achieved for q HNC = 1.7x10-5 above 870 km. The HNC profile in which the dissociation by Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) is turned off (black profile in Fig. 26 of Ref. [14]), when multiplied by a modest factor of 1.15, also provides an excellent match to the radial dependence of the emission. Top right panel: HNC J = (39-38) line, extracted on an annulus ranging from 2000-3350 km from Titan center. The previous model with no GCR contribution matches the line shape; in contrast, other models from Ref. [14] (red and blue profiles in their Fig. 26) have too much HNC in the lower mesosphere below 600 km and produce unobserved line- wings. HC3N: For HC3N, the piecewise profiles have the following abundances: 1.05x10-7 above 400 km, 4.4x10-6 above 600 km, and 1.4x10-4 above 800 km. The models are shifted upwards by 0.07 units for clarity. The best fit for piecewise models is achieved for q HC3N = 7x10-6 above 630 km. Due to the selection criterion for the HC3N data, the associated profile pertains to the equatorial region only. Bottom right panel. HC3N J=39-38 line on the equatorial west limb, compared to best fit model (light blue) resulting from inversion of the line profile and including constraints from the radial dependence of the line- integrated HC3N (38-37) fluxes at low latitude. In contrast, the nominal HC3N profile of 25 Ref. [14] (their Fig. 10, red line) fails at matching both observables (yellow symbols in the two bottom panels), indicating that that profile has too much HC3N at low altitudes and not enough at high altitudes. Figure 3 summarizes the retrieved profiles for all six molecules used to probe the winds. Error bars are indicated in the range where information is available. For HNC and HC3N, uncertainties are best expressed as a vertical shift of ±40 km and ±30 km in the profiles, for reasons explained above. These profiles are compared to characteristic profiles locally derived from Cassini/UVIS at 6°S (T41I, Ref. [42]), INMS41,46, and CIRS. For the latter, we show HCN and CH3CCH profiles at 9°S from May 2016 (T119, Ref. [45]); for HC3N, not clearly detected in the latter observations, we use instead a 5°N profile from Jan. 2007 (T23, Ref. [47]). Also shown in Fig. 3 are disk-averaged HCN and HC3N profiles derived from 2012-2015 ALMA observations ([33], their Fig. 10). Figure 3 highlights the overall agreement between these profiles, giving in particular great confidence in our HCN and HC3N profiles in the middle/upper atmosphere. A noteworthy difference is that "local" molecular profiles (from Cassini CIRS and UVIS) show small-scale vertical variations (see e.g. Figs. 3-4 of Ref. [47], and Fig. 26 of Ref. [42]), not predicted in photochemical models14 and presumably of dynamical origin; those are particularly visible in Fig. 3 for the HCN and HC3N profiles derived from UVIS. 4) Wind structure and wind models In Supplementary Figure 6, the line-of-sight wind velocities are plotted as a function of the "algebraic" projected distance to Titan's axis -- by definition, the latter is positive (resp. negative) sky-east (resp. west) of the polar axis, and the distance is expressed in units of Titan's "effective" radius, i.e. the (species-dependent) radial distance at the altitude of the wind contribution function (WCF)-weighted mean probed altitude. (Given the strong variation of the HCN WCF between nadir and limb, HCN LOS winds within the disk are not included). In this type of representation (and ignoring for now beam convolution effects), a solid-body rotation appears as a straight line with slope equal to veq cos(β), where β = 26°N is the sub-Earth latitude. (In contrast, such plots do not permit one to investigate latitudinal dependences). Best fit and error bars for veq were obtained from error-bar weighted fits of the individual measurements. In Supplementary Figure 6, LOS winds from different molecules are compared two-by-two, and linear fits are over-plotted with best fit veq values indicated. This figure highlights several facts: (i) wind values from CH3CN, CH3CCH, and DCN show excellent consistency (despite the larger uncertainties on the latter two species), both in their structure and in the veq value (191-206 m/s) (ii) HNC winds are clearly different in speed and structure; although a solid-body rotation model leads to a best fit veq = 297 m/s, they do not align well on a straight line, instead showing a deviation from the solid body rotation to higher velocities at large distances, i.e. an equatorial jet (iii) The veq values for the HCN main line and HC3N winds are virtually identical (287-290 m/s), and the structures seen in their maps seem intermediate between those of CH3CN and HNC (although HCN exhibits a stronger "tongue" at large distances than HC3N) (iv) although the HCN main line nominally probes the atmosphere 26 ~200 km higher than the satellite lines (see Fig. 3), the associated veq values are only marginally different. The last panel of Supplementary Figure 6 shows the variation of the fitted equatorial velocity with altitude, as indicated by the WCF for each molecule. These findings are consistent with the three altitude regions outlined above and with a general increase of winds with altitude, with a marked gradient over 350-600 km. Still, the vertical shear du/dz (using u = veq) is small enough that the Richardson number Ri = N2 / (du/dz)2, where N is the Brunt -- Väisälä frequency, rises from ~20 at 300 km to ~1000 at 1000 km. This is safely above the threshold Ri < ¼ for turbulence. The above description is approximate, especially because it ignores beam-convolution effects. In addition, the data indicate more complex structure than solid-body rotation, with a progressive onset of the jet regime above ~600 km. To estimate the wind regime indicated by the data, we simulated the expected LOS Doppler shifts, testing various cases for the latitudinal distribution of winds. The expected Doppler shifts were calculated locally by considering a globe with radius defined by the mean probed altitude and projecting the zonal winds accordingly, accounting for the viewing geometry with sub- earth latitude at 26°N. In doing so, we also included the minor effect of Titan's solid body rotation with orbital period of 15.95 days (giving e.g. a 16 m/s equatorial speed at 990 km altitude, the nominal altitude probed by HNC). Only purely zonal winds were considered, e.g. no meridional components were included. The modelled local LOS Doppler shifts were then weighted by the local line intensity -- i.e. the line emission signal integrated over the spectral interval used to measure the winds in the data -- and finally convolved by the instrumental beam. We performed this exercise for winds measured in CH3CN, HNC and HC3N, noting that this is still an approximate way of modelling the data. Indeed, given the vertical extent of the wind contribution functions, especially for HC3N and HCN, the only completely rigorous approach would consist of testing 2D (latitude, altitude) wind fields and generate the associated synthetic line profiles, incorporating the altitude-dependent Doppler shifts in the absorption coefficients before performing the radiative transfer. Such synthetic profiles would finally be refit for Doppler shifts in the same manner as the actual data. This complex task, particularly needed for HC3N and HCN, is left for the future. With this caveat in mind, Supplementary Figure 7 shows synthetic wind models for CH3CN, HNC and HC3N that provide a satisfactory match to the data shown in Fig. 2. As is clear from the first panel of Supplementary Figure 7, the zonal wind magnitude and its latitudinal dependence are different between the three species, indicative of an evolution of the wind regime with altitude. Meridional winds are not obviously present in the data. Assuming equator-to-pole or pole-to-pole circulation, a meridional circulation would be best visible at mid-latitudes along the central meridian. Only the CH3CN data are suited for that, and based on the wind contours in Fig. 2, we estimate an upper limit of ~25 m/s for such winds. Similarly, day- to-night flows would be best captured from Doppler shifts in the polar region (e.g. receding winds at the poles for SSAS winds). Our data do not give any consistent evidence for this either, with an upper limit estimated to ~30 m/s. 27 Supplementary Figure 6. Line-of-sight wind velocities as a function of projected distance from polar axis. The distance is expressed in units of "Titan effective radius", defined as the radial distance at the WCF-weighted mean probed altitude (e.g. 3565 km for HNC). By convention, the distance is positive (resp. negative) for points located sky- east (resp. west) from the polar axis. Straight lines show simple linear fits to the data assuming solid-body rotation (see text) with the corresponding equatorial velocities indicated. The fit for CH3CN (black line) is repeated on all panels for comparison. The last panel shows the variation of the fitted equatorial velocity with altitude. In that panel, the color code is used consistently with the other panels, and the vertical error bars indicate the extent of the wind contribution functions (see Fig. 3). 28 Supplementary Figure 7. Modelled wind structure. Simulated Doppler shifts for HNC, HC3N and CH3CN, using the respective latitude profiles of the zonal wind shown in the first panel. Local line-of-sight winds are weighted by line intensities and convolved by the instrumental beam. Titan's solid-body rotation is included. These figures approximate the observed maps for these species (see Fig. 2). 29
0908.1672	2	0908	2009-08-21T19:34:38	HAT-P-7: A Retrograde or Polar Orbit, and a Third Body	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	We show that the exoplanet HAT-P-7b has an extremely tilted orbit, with a true angle of at least 86 degrees with respect to its parent star's equatorial plane, and a strong possibility of retrograde motion. We also report evidence for an additional planet or companion star. The evidence for the unparalleled orbit and the third body is based on precise observations of the star's apparent radial velocity. The anomalous radial velocity due to rotation (the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect) was found to be a blueshift during the first half of the transit and a redshift during the second half, an inversion of the usual pattern, implying that the angle between the sky-projected orbital and stellar angular momentum vectors is 182.5 +/- 9.4 degreees. The third body is implicated by excess radial-velocity variation of the host star over 2 yr. Some possible explanations for the tilted orbit are a close encounter with another planet, the Kozai effect, and resonant capture by an inward-migrating outer planet.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	DRAFT VERSION NOVEMBER 2, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 HAT-P-7: A RETROGRADE OR POLAR ORBIT, AND A THIRD BODY ANDREW W. HOWARD4,5, GEOFFREY W. MARCY4, IAN J. CROSSFIELD6, MATTHEW J. HOLMAN7 JOSHUA N. WINN1, JOHN ASHER JOHNSON2,3, SIMON ALBRECHT1, Draft version November 2, 2018 ABSTRACT We show that the exoplanet HAT-P-7b has an extremely tilted orbit, with a true angle of at least 86◦ with respect to its parent star's equatorial plane, and a strong possibility of retrograde motion. We also report evidence for an additional planet or companion star. The evidence for the unparalleled orbit and the third body is based on precise observations of the star's apparent radial velocity. The anomalous radial velocity due to rotation (the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect) was found to be a blueshift during the first half of the transit and a redshift during the second half, an inversion of the usual pattern, implying that the angle between the sky- projected orbital and stellar angular momentum vectors is 182.◦5 ± 9.◦4. The third body is implicated by excess radial-velocity variation of the host star over 2 yr. Some possible explanations for the tilted orbit are a close encounter with another planet, the Kozai effect, and resonant capture by an inward-migrating outer planet. Subject headings: planetary systems -- planetary systems: formation -- stars: individual (HAT-P-7) -- stars: rotation 1. INTRODUCTION In the Solar system, the planetary orbits are well-aligned and prograde, revolving in the same direction as the rotation of the Sun. This fact inspired the "nebular hypothesis" that the Sun and planets formed from a single spinning disk (Laplace 1796). One might also expect exoplanetary orbits to be well- aligned with their parent stars, and indeed this is true of most systems for which it has been possible to compare the direc- tions of orbital motion and stellar rotation (Fabrycky & Winn 2009, Le Bouquin et al. 2009). However, there are at least 3 exoplanets for which the orbit is tilted by a larger angle than any of the planets in the Solar system: XO-3b (Hébrard et al. 2008, Winn et al. 2009a), HD 80606b (Moutou et al. 2009, Pont et al. 2009, Winn et al. 2009b), and WASP-14b (Johnson et al. 2009). Still, all of those systems are consistent with prograde or- bits, with the largest minimum angle between the stellar- rotational and orbital angular momentum vectors of about 37◦, for XO-3b (Winn et al. 2009a). The reason why only the minimum angle is known is that the evidence for misalign- ment is based on the eponymous effect of Rossiter (1924) and McLaughlin (1924), an anomalous Doppler shift observed during planetary transits that is sensitive only to the angle be- tween the sky projections of the two vectors. The true spin- orbit angle may be larger, depending on the unknown inclina- tion angle of the stellar rotation axis with respect to the line of sight. In this Letter we present evidence of a very large spin-orbit misalignment for HAT-P-7b, a planet of mass 1.8 MJup and 1 Department of Physics, and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 2 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 3 NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow 4 Department of Astronomy, University of California, Mail Code 3411, Berkeley, CA 94720 geles, CA 90095 bridge, MA 02138 5 Townes Postdoctoral Fellow, Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 6 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los An- 7 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cam- radius 1.4 RJup in a 2.2-day orbit around an F6V star with mass 1.5 M⊙ and radius 1.8 R⊙ (Pál et al. 2008). We find the angle between the sky-projected angular momentum vectors to be 182.◦5 ± 9.◦4. Furthermore we show that the true angle ψ between those vectors is likely greater than 86◦, indicating that the orbit is either retrograde (ψ > 90◦) or nearly polar (ψ ≈ 90◦). We also present evidence for a third body in the system, which may be an additional planet or a companion star. We present spectroscopic data in § 2, photometric data in § 3, a joint analysis of both types of data in § 4, and a discussion of the results in § 5. 2. RADIAL VELOCITIES We observed HAT-P-7 with the High Resolution Spectro- graph (HIRES) on the Keck I 10m telescope, and the High Dispersion Spectrograph (HDS) on the Subaru 8m telescope. The planet's discoverers (Pál et al. 2008; hereafter, P08) ob- tained 8 HIRES spectra in 2007, to which we add 9 spectra from 2009. All but one of the HIRES spectra were acquired outside of transits. Of the 49 HDS spectra, 9 were obtained on 2009 June 17 and 40 were obtained on 2009 July 1. The second of these nights spanned a transit. The instrument settings and observing procedures in both 2007 and 2009 were identical to those used by the California Planet Search (CPS; Howard et al. 2009). We placed an io- dine gas absorption cell into the optical path, to calibrate the instrumental response and wavelength scale. The radial ve- locity (RV) of each spectrum was measured with respect to an iodine-free template spectrum, using the algorithm of Butler et al. (2006) with subsequent improvements. Measurement errors were estimated from the scatter in the fits to individual spectral segments spanning a few Angstroms. The RVs are given in Table 1. 2.1. Evidence for a third body Fig. 1 shows the RVs over the 2 yr span of the observations. Fig. 2 shows the RVs as a function of orbital phase, fitted with 2 different models. The first model is a single Keplerian orbit, representing the signal of the known planet. The sec- ond model has an additional parameter γ representing an ex- tra radial acceleration. The second model gives a better fit to 2 Winn, Johnson, Albrecht, et al. 2009 FIG. 1. -- Long-term radial velocity variation of HAT-P-7. (a) Measured RVs. (b) Residuals (observed - calculated) be- tween the data and the best-fitting single-planet model. Light blue and dark blue points are HIRES data from 2007 and 2009, respectively. the data, with a root-mean-squared (rms) residual of 7 m s- 1 as compared to 21 m s- 1 for the first model. The RVs from 2009 are systematically redshifted by approximately 40 m s - 1 compared to RVs from 2007, as evident from the residuals shown in Figs. 1(b) and 2(b). This shift is highly significant, as the CPS has demonstrated a long-term stability of 2 m s- 1 or better using HIRES and the same reduction codes used here (Howard et al. 2009). A transiting planet in a well-aligned prograde orbit would first pass in front of the blueshifted (approaching) half of the star, causing an anomalous redshift of the observed starlight. Then, the planet would cross to the redshifted (receding) half of the star, causing an anomalous blueshift. In contrast, Fig. 3(a) shows a blueshift followed by a redshift: an inver- sion of the effect just described. We may conclude, even with- out any modeling, that the orbital "north pole" and the stellar "north pole" point in nearly opposite directions on the sky. 3. PHOTOMETRY For a quantitative analysis of the RM effect we wanted to model both the photometric and spectroscopic transit signals. For this purpose we supplemented the RV data with the most precise transit light curve available to us, shown in Fig. 3(c). This light curve is based on observations on UT 2008 Sep 22 in the Sloan i bandpass, with the Fred L. Whipple 1.2m tele- scope and Keplercam detector, under the auspices of the Tran- sit Light Curve project (Holman et al. 2006, Winn et al. 2007). Reduction of the CCD images involved standard procedures for bias subtraction and flat-field division. Differential aper- ture photometry was performed for HAT-P-7 and 7 compari- son stars. No evidence was found for time-correlated noise us- ing the "time-averaging" method of Pont et al. (2006), as im- plemented by Winn et al. (2009c). The data shown in Fig. 3(c) were corrected for differential extinction as explained in § 4. 4. JOINT ANALYSIS We fitted a model to the photometric and RV data in or- der to derive quantitative constraints on the angle λ between the sky projections of the orbital and stellar-rotational angu- lar momentum vectors. This angle is defined such that λ = 0◦ when the sky-projected vectors are parallel and λ = 180◦ when they are antiparallel. Our model for the RM effect was based on the technique of Winn et al. (2005): we simulated spectra exhibiting the RM effect at various transit phases, and then measured the apparent RV of the simulated spectra using the This RV trend is evidence for an additional companion. Given the limited time coverage of our observations (two clus- ters of points separated by 2 yr), the data are compatible with nearly any period longer than a few months. A constant ac- celeration is the simplest model that fits the excess RV vari- ability, and under that assumption we may give an order-of- magnitude relation relating γ to some properties of the com- panion, Mc sin ic a2 c ∼ γ G = (0.121 ± 0.014) MJup AU- 2, (1) where Mc is the companion mass, ic its orbital inclination rel- ative to the line of sight, ac its orbital distance, and the numer- ical value is based on our model-fitting results (see § 4). 2.2. Evidence for a spin-orbit misalignment Fig. 3(a) shows the RV data spanning the transit, after sub- tracting the orbital RV as computed with the best-fitting model including γ. We interpret the "anomalous" RV variation dur- ing the transit as the Rossiter-McLaughlin (RM) effect, the asymmetry in the spectral lines due to the partial eclipse of the rotating photosphere. In the context of eclipsing binary stars, the RM effect was predicted by Holt (1893) and observed definitively by Rossiter (1924) and McLaughlin (1924). For exoplanets, the RM effect was first observed by Queloz et al. (2000), and its use in assessing spin-orbit alignment has been expounded by Ohta et al. (2005) and Gaudi & Winn (2007). Outlandish orbit of HAT-P-7b 3 FIG. 2. -- Phased radial velocity variation of HAT-P-7. (a) Assuming a single Keplerian orbit. (b) Residuals. (c) With an extra parameter γ representing a constant radial acceleration. (d) Residuals. The circles are HIRES data (light blue from 2007, dark blue from 2009), the green triangles are HDS data from 2009 June 17, and the red squares are HDS data from 2009 July 01. same Doppler code that is used on actual data. This allowed us to relate the anomalous RV to the parameters and positions of the star and planet. The RV model was the sum of the Keplerian RV and the anomalous RV due to the RM effect. The photometric model was based on the analytic equation for the flux of a quadrati- cally limb-darkened disk with a circular obstruction (Mandel & Agol 2002). As a compromise between fixing the limb- darkening coefficients u1 and u2 at theoretically calculated values, and giving them complete freedom, we fixed u1 - u2 at the tabulated value of 0.3846 (Claret 2004) and allowed u1 + u2 to be a free parameter. We also included a free pa- rameter for the coefficient of differential airmass extinction between HAT-P-7 and the ensemble of comparison stars. We determined the best values of the model parameters and their 68.3% confidence limits using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, as described in our previous works (see, e.g., Winn et al. 2009a). The likelihood function was given by exp(- χ2/2) with (cid:20) fi(obs) - (cid:20) vi(obs) - vi(calc) fi(calc) (cid:21)2 (cid:21)2 χ2 = , + Nv Xi=1 N f Xi=1 σ f ,i σv,i (2) in a self-explanatory notation, with σ f ,i chosen to be 0.00136, and σv,i chosen to be the quadrature sum of the RV measure- ment error and a "stellar jitter" term of 9.3 m s- 1. These choices led to χ2 = Ndof for the minimum-χ2 model. A Gaus- sian prior constraint was imposed upon the orbital period based on the precise measurement of P08. Table 2 gives the results for the model parameters. In par- ticular, the result for λ is 182.5 ±9.4 deg, close to antiparallel, 4 Winn, Johnson, Albrecht, et al. 2009 FIG. 3. -- The spectroscopic and photometric transit of HAT-P-7b. (a) The anomalous RV, defined as the output of the Doppler code minus the orbital RV. We observed a blueshift in the first half of the transit, and a redshift in the second half of the transit, demonstrating that the sky projections of the orbital and stellar angular momentum vectors point in opposite directions. (b) Residuals. Red squares are HDS data from 2009 July 1, and blue circles are HIRES data obtained on various nights in 2007 and 2009. (c) The relative flux, observed in the Sloan i band with the FLWO 1.2m telescope and Keplercam. (d) Residuals. In panels (a) and (b), the gray line shows the best fitting model. as anticipated from the qualitative discussion of § 2. 5. DISCUSSION Our finding for λ is strongly suggestive of retrograde mo- tion, in which the orbital motion and stellar rotation are in opposite directions. However, it must be remembered that λ refers to the angle between the sky-projected angular momen- tum vectors. The true angle ψ between the vectors is given by (3) where i and i⋆ are the line-of-sight inclinations of the or- bital and stellar angular momentum vectors, respectively. Al- though i is known precisely from the transit data, i⋆ is un- cos ψ = cosi⋆ cosi + sini⋆ sin icos λ, known. Supposing i⋆ to be drawn from an "isotropic" distribu- tion (uniform in cosi⋆), the data demand that ψ > 86.◦3 with 99.73% confidence. Thus, under this assumption, a retrograde orbit is strongly favored, although a nearly-polar and barely- prograde orbit cannot be ruled out. In fact there is circumstantial evidence that i⋆ is small and consequently the orbit of HAT-P-7b is nearly polar (ψ ≈ 90◦). The star's projected rotation rate is unusually low for such a hot star: vsin i⋆ = 4.9+1.2 - 0.9 km s- 1 in our model, or 3.8 ± 0.5 km s- 1 based on the line profile analysis of P08; and Teff = 6350 ± 80 K according to P08. In the SPOCS catalog of dwarf stars with well-determined spectroscopic Outlandish orbit of HAT-P-7b 5 properties (Valenti & Fischer 2005), only 2 of 37 stars with Teff = 6350 ± 100 K have vsin i⋆ < 4.9 km s- 1. Based on this catalog, the mean rotation rate v for such hot stars is about 15 km s- 1. As an alternate approach to con- straining ψ, we assumed the rotation velocity v is drawn from a Gaussian distribution with mean 15 km s- 1 and standard de- viation 3 km s- 1. The result is ψ = 94.6+5.5 - 3.0 deg with 68.3% confidence, and ψ > 86.◦1 with 99.73% confidence. This anal- ysis favors nearly-polar and retrograde orbits. However, one wonders whether HAT-P-7 should be expected to have a "typi- cal" rotation rate, given the existence of its short-period planet on a bizarre orbit. Another caveat is that we found the scaled semimajor axis a/R⋆ to be about 1σ smaller than the find- ing of P08, suggesting the star is somewhat larger and more evolved, which would correspond to a slower expected rota- tion rate. Determining i⋆ directly may be possible by measuring and interpreting asteroseismological oscillations (Gizon & Solanki 2003), or photometric modulations produced by starspots (see, e.g., Henry & Winn 2008). By good fortune, HAT-P-7 is in the field of view of the Kepler satellite, which is capable of precise long-term photometry and may be able to accomplish these tasks (Borucki et al. 2009). The extraordinary orbit of HAT-P-7b presents an extreme case for theories of planet formation and subsequent orbital evolution. HAT-P-7b is a "hot Jupiter" and presumably mi- grated inward toward the star after its formation. A prevail- ing migration theory involves tidal interactions with the proto- planetary disk, but such interactions would probably not per- turb the initial coplanarity of the system, and might even bring the system into closer alignment (Lubow & Ogilvie 2001, Cresswell et al. 2007). More promising to explain HAT-P-7b are scenarios involving few-body dynamics, as those scenar- ios are expected to produce misalignments. In one scenario, close encounters between planets throw a planet inward, where its orbit is ultimately shrunk and circularized by tidal dissipation (Chatterjee et al. 2008, Juri´c & Tremaine 2008). Another idea is based on the Kozai (1962) effect, whereby the gravitational force from a distant body on a highly inclined orbit strongly modulates an inner planet's orbital eccentricity and inclination (Fabrycky & Tremaine 2007). Recent calcu- lations showed that a combination of planet-planet scattering, the Kozai effect, and tidal friction can lead to nearly-circular retrograde orbits (Nagasawa et al. 2008). A third proposed scenario involves an inward-migrating outer planet that cap- tures an inner planet into a mean motion resonance; if the inner planet avoids being ejected or consumed by the star, it may be released on a nearly-circular retrograde orbit (Yu & Tremaine 2001). The prospect of explaining HAT-P-7b's orbit through few- body dynamics lends extra importance to measuring the mass and orbital parameters of the third body. If it turns out to be a planet, then HAT-P-7b will be only the second known case of a transiting planet accompanied by another planet, the first being HAT-P-13b (Bakos et al. 2009). Such systems are highly desirable because the unusually precise measure- ments enabled by transit observations can be used to deter- mine whether the orbits are coplanar and give clues about the system's dynamical history (Fabrycky 2009). Note added after submission. -- Narita et al. (2009) report independent evidence for a retrograde or polar orbit of HAT- P-7b, based on Subaru/HDS spectra spanning the transit of 2008 May 30. We are grateful to Yasushi Suto and Ed Turner for stimu- lating our interest in this subject; Norio Narita and his team for sharing their data in advance of publication; Dan Fab- rycky, Guillaume Hébrard, András Pál, Darin Ragozzine, Scott Tremaine, Bill Welsh, and the anonymous referee for helpful comments on the manuscript; Akito Tajitsu, Tae-Soo Pyo, Mark Everett, Howard Isaacson, and Zach Gazak for as- sistance with observing; Gáspár Bakos and Joel Hartman for help obtaining telescope time; Eric Gaidos and Debra Fischer for trading telescope time on short notice; and Hector Balbon- tin for hospitality at Las Campanas Observatory where this manuscript was written. Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and was made possible by the gener- ous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation. We ex- tend special thanks to those of Hawaiian ancestry on whose sacred mountain of Mauna Kea we are privileged to be guests. Without their generous hospitality, the Keck observations pre- sented herein would not have been possible. J.A.J. grate- fully acknowledges support from the NSF Astronomy and As- trophysics Postdoctoral Fellowship program (grant no. AST- 0702821). S.A. acknowledges the support of the Nether- lands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). J.N.W. gratefully acknowledges support from the NASA Origins pro- gram through awards NNX09AD36G and NNX09AB33G, and from an MIT Class of 1942 Career Development Profes- sorship. Facilities: Subaru (HDS), Keck:I (HIRES), FLWO:1.2m (Keplercam) REFERENCES Bakos, G. A., et al. 2009, arXiv:0907.3525 Borucki, W. J., et al. 2009, Science, 325, 709 Butler, R. P., et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 505 Chatterjee, S., Ford, E. B., Matsumura, S., & Rasio, F. A. 2008, ApJ, 686, Holt, J. R. 1893, Astronomy and Astro-Physics, 12, 646 Howard, A. W., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 75 Johnson, J. A., Winn, J. N., Albrecht, S., Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., & Gazak, J. Z. 2009, arXiv:0907.5204 Juri´c, M., & Tremaine, S. 2008, ApJ, 686, 603 Kozai, Y. 1962, AJ, 67, 591 Laplace, P. S. 1796, Exposition du système du monde (Paris: Cercle-Social) Le Bouquin, J.-B., Absil, O., Benisty, M., Massi, F., Mérand, A., & Stefl, S. 2009, A&A, 498, L41 Lubow, S. H., & Ogilvie, G. I. 2001, ApJ, 560, 997 Mandel, K., & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, L171 McLaughlin, D. B. 1924, ApJ, 60, 22 Moutou, C., et al. 2009, A&A, 498, L5 Nagasawa, M., Ida, S., & Bessho, T. 2008, ApJ, 678, 498 Narita, N., Sato, B., Hirano, T., & Tamura, M. 2009, arXiv:0908.1673 Ohta, Y., Taruya, A., & Suto, Y. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1118 580 Claret 2004, A&A, 428, 1001 Cresswell, P., Dirksen, G., Kley, W., & Nelson, R. P. 2007, A&A, 473, 329 Fabrycky, D., & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298 Fabrycky, D. C., & Winn, J. N. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1230 Fabrycky, D. C. 2009, in Proc. IAU Symposium 253, eds. F. Pont, D.D. Sasselov, & M.J. Holman (Cambridge: CUP), 173 Gaudi, B. S. & Winn, J. N. 2007, ApJ, 655, 550 Gizon, L., & Solanki, S. K. 2003, ApJ, 589, 1009 Hébrard, G., et al. 2008, A&A, 488, 763 Henry, G. W., & Winn, J. N. 2008, AJ, 135, 68 Holman, M. J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1715 6 Winn, Johnson, Albrecht, et al. 2009 Pál, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1450 Pont, F., Zucker, S., & Queloz, D. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 231 Pont, F., et al. 2009, A&A, 502, 695 Queloz, D., Eggenberger, A., Mayor, M., Perrier, C., Beuzit, J. L., Naef, D., Sivan, J. P., & Udry, S. 2000, A&A, 359, L13 Rossiter, R. A. 1924, ApJ, 60, 15 Valenti, J. A., & Fischer, D. A. 2005, ApJS, 159, 141 Winn, J. N., et al. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1215 Winn, J. N., Holman, M. J., & Fuentes, C. I. 2007, AJ, 133, 11 Winn, J. N., et al. 2009a, ApJ, 700, 302 Winn, J. N., et al. 2009b, ApJ, in press [arXiv:0907.5205] Winn, J. N., et al. 2009c, ApJ, 693, 794 Yu, Q., & Tremaine, S. 2001, AJ, 121, 1736 RELATIVE RADIAL VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS OF HAT-P-7 TABLE 1 HJD RV [m s- 1] Error [m s- 1] Spec.a 2454336.73960 2454336.85367 2454337.76212 2454338.77440 2454338.85456 2454339.89886 2454343.83180 2454344.98805 2454983.99020 2454985.02095 2454987.01053 2454988.00940 2455014.95322 2455016.05508 2455042.03696 2455042.98594 2455044.07369 2455000.03550 2455000.07080 2455000.07507 2455000.07933 2455000.08361 2455000.08787 2455000.09214 2455000.09641 2455000.10068 2455013.75919 2455013.76487 2455013.77030 2455013.77573 2455013.78114 2455013.78703 2455013.79245 2455013.79787 2455013.80330 2455013.80871 2455013.81412 2455013.81955 2455013.82496 2455013.83039 2455013.83580 2455013.84121 2455013.84664 2455013.85206 2455013.85748 2455013.86290 2455013.86832 2455013.87374 2455013.88433 2455013.88976 2455013.89518 2455013.90060 2455013.90603 2455013.91145 2455013.92034 2455013.92575 2455013.93118 2455013.93660 2455013.94201 2455013.94744 2455013.95286 2455013.95829 2455013.96372 2455013.96913 2455013.97456 2455013.98000 111.08 58.89 - 236.06 151.06 131.12 - 256.42 - 162.19 84.42 - 77.44 110.41 189.80 - 221.82 - 41.51 4.10 189.91 - 228.74 191.34 196.69 184.21 210.15 195.95 193.11 225.66 210.55 224.15 195.24 74.13 81.76 55.46 44.87 53.93 61.60 42.35 36.87 30.06 25.86 29.68 11.37 5.68 15.44 13.27 3.74 12.79 5.91 - 4.64 0.95 - 10.16 - 3.95 - 7.40 - 1.91 - 22.65 5.42 - 5.14 - 13.89 - 14.44 - 9.34 2.95 - 37.18 - 22.51 - 35.31 - 11.12 5.23 - 59.30 - 63.07 - 55.50 - 64.15 1.72 1.78 1.70 1.54 1.57 1.83 1.75 2.15 2.20 1.96 2.23 2.28 2.08 2.23 2.53 2.40 2.55 12.26 11.29 11.25 11.94 13.30 12.45 11.67 12.23 11.97 8.47 7.53 8.11 7.60 7.71 7.50 6.83 7.31 7.10 6.95 7.44 6.86 6.69 6.63 5.85 5.69 6.91 6.67 6.31 6.07 6.26 5.32 5.70 6.11 5.91 6.32 5.87 6.19 5.90 5.80 5.79 5.53 5.80 5.01 6.17 5.75 5.56 6.04 5.88 5.92 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 Outlandish orbit of HAT-P-7b TABLE 1 -- Continued HJD RV [m s- 1] Error [m s- 1] Spec.a 2455013.98542 2455013.99086 2455013.99627 2455014.00486 2455014.01029 2455014.01572 2455014.02114 2455014.02656 2455014.03199 2455014.03742 2455014.04285 2455014.04828 2455014.06427 2455014.06971 2455014.07514 2455014.11226 2455014.11769 2455014.12312 2455014.12855 2455014.13397 - 60.13 - 55.52 - 69.24 - 76.79 - 80.53 - 73.56 - 90.86 - 81.24 - 109.25 - 100.31 - 107.39 - 107.15 - 114.12 - 110.83 - 114.67 - 146.78 - 137.88 - 143.30 - 136.48 - 111.90 5.24 4.96 4.86 5.51 5.47 5.96 5.19 6.44 5.29 5.77 6.12 5.91 5.32 5.39 5.97 5.93 5.84 6.07 5.96 7.02 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 NOTE. -- The RV was measured relative to an arbitrary template spectrum specific to each spectrograph; only the differences among the RVs from a single spectrograph are significant. The uncertainty given in Column 3 is the internal error only and does not account for any possible "stellar jitter." a (1) Keck/HIRES, (2) Subaru/HDS. TABLE 2 MODEL PARAMETERS FOR HAT-P-7B Parameter Value Orbital period, P [d] Midtransit time [HJD] Transit duration (first to fourth contact) [hr] Transit ingress or egress duration [hr] Planet-to-star radius ratio, Rp/R⋆ Orbital inclination, i [deg] Scaled semimajor axis, a/R⋆ Transit impact parameter Velocity semiamplitude, K [m s- 1] Upper limit on eccentricity (99.73% conf.) e cos ω e sin ω Velocity offset, Keck/HIRES [m s- 1] Velocity offset, Subaru/HDS [m s- 1] Constant radial acceleration γ [m s- 1 yr- 1] Projected stellar rotation rate, v sin i⋆ [km s- 1] Projected spin-orbit angle, λ [deg] 2.2047304 ± 0.0000024 2, 454, 731.67929 ± 0.00043 0.039 - 0.0019 ± 0.0077 0.0037 ± 0.0124 4.006 ± 0.064 0.474+0.061 - 0.093 0.0834+0.0012 - 0.0021 80.8+2.8 - 1.2 3.82+0.39 - 0.16 0.618+0.039 - 0.149 211.8 ± 2.6 - 51.2 ± 3.6 - 4.8 ± 2.5 21.5 ± 2.6 4.9+1.2 - 0.9 182.5 ± 9.4
1812.06150	2	1812	2018-12-20T23:11:05	Synergy between asteroseismology and exoplanet science: an outlook	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	Space-based asteroseismology has been playing an important role in the characterization of exoplanet-host stars and their planetary systems. The future looks even brighter, with space missions such as NASA's TESS and ESA's PLATO ready to take on this legacy. In this contribution, we provide an outlook on the synergy between asteroseismology and exoplanet science, namely, on the prospect of conducting a populational study of giant planets around oscillating evolved stars with the TESS mission.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	PHOST "Physics of Oscillating Stars" -- a conference in honour of Prof. H. Shibahashi, 2-7 Sept. 2018, Banyuls-sur-mer (France) Edited by J. Ballot, S. Vauclair, & G. Vauclair 8 1 0 2 c e D 0 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 0 5 1 6 0 . 2 1 8 1 : v i X r a Synergy between asteroseismology and exoplanet science: an outlook Tiago L. Campante1,2, Susana C. C. Barros1,2, Olivier Demangeon1, Hugo J. da Nóbrega2,3, James S. Kuszlewicz4,5, Filipe Pereira1, William J. Chaplin6,5, and Daniel Huber7 1 Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, PT4150-762 Porto, Portugal Email: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, PT4169-007 Porto, Portugal 3 CAP -- Centre for Applied Photonics, INESC TEC, Porto, Portugal 4 Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany 5 Stellar Astrophysics Centre (SAC), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 6 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK 7 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai'i, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA Abstract Space-based asteroseismology has been playing an important role in the characterization of exoplanet-host stars and their planetary systems. The future looks even brighter, with space missions such as NASA's TESS and ESA's PLATO ready to take on this legacy. In this contribution, we provide an outlook on the synergy between asteroseismology and exoplanet science, namely, on the prospect of conducting a populational study of giant planets around oscillating evolved stars with the TESS mission. 1 Introduction The asteroseismology revolution initiated by Kepler (Borucki et al., 2010) is set to continue over the coming decades with the launches of TESS (Ricker et al., 2015), PLATO (Rauer et al., 2014), as well as WFIRST (Spergel et al., 2013), with these missions expected to raise the number of solar-like oscillators to a few million stars (Huber, 2018). Note that over 90 % of all detections are expected to be for evolved stars, with PLATO by far contributing the most de- tections for dwarfs and subgiants (∼ 80,000). If we combine this with dedicated ground-based e(cid:29)orts, such as the SONG network (Grundahl et al., 2017) of 1-meter telescopes, we are then positive that the synergy between asteroseismology and exoplanet science can only continue to grow (Campante et al., 2018). Synergetic studies of evolved stars are made possible by even moderate photometric cadences, which can be used to simultaneously detect transits and stellar oscillations. A very exciting prospect is that of conducting asteroseismology of red-giant hosts using the 30-minute cadence of TESS full- frame images (FFIs). Based on an all-sky stellar and plan- etary synthetic population (Sullivan et al., 2015), we predict that solar-like oscillations will be detectable in up to 200 low- luminosity red-giant branch (LLRGB) stars hosting close-in giant planets (Campante et al., 2016). The population of transiting planets around evolved stars is so far largely unexplored (Huber, 2018). And although radial-velocity surveys are mostly complete for planets near or above 1 MJup at > 0.2 AU, there is a dearth of plan- ets with orbital periods P < 80 d. Nonetheless, Kepler/K2 have discovered several close-in giant planets around LL- RGB stars (e.g., Grunblatt et al., 2016, 2017), hinting at a population of warm sub-Jovian planets around evolved stars that would be accessible to TESS. Kepler/K2 mainly targeted main-sequence stars, and observed too few LLRGB stars to detect enough planets for robust statistics. TESS will increase the number of LLRGB stars with space-based photometry by one order of magnitude over Kepler/K2, providing an un- precedented opportunity to address a number of key ques- tions in exoplanet science, namely: • The role of stellar (cid:30)ux on hot-Jupiter in(cid:30)ation; • Giant-planet occurrence as a function of stellar mass and evolution; • Correlation between metallicity and giant-planet oc- currence around evolved stars. In this work, we start by characterizing the parent popu- lation of LLRGB stars to be searched for transits based on a galaxia (Sharma et al., 2011) simulation (Sect. 2). We focus on the southern ecliptic hemisphere, which will be surveyed during year 1 of TESS's primary mission. We next imple- ment a software tool for planetary-transit search based on a Box-(cid:27)tting Least Squares (BLS) algorithm (Sect. 3). The tool is tested both for statistical false positive rates and de- tection sensitivity using arti(cid:27)cial TESS light curves. The for- mer involves running the code on a su(cid:28)ciently large num- ber of light curves containing only instrumental/shot noise and stellar (correlated) signals, namely, granulation and os- cillations. The latter involves running the code on the same light curves, although now with injected transits. We con- clude with a few considerations regarding the use of TESS photometry alone in candidate vetting (Sect. 4). 2 Parent stellar population 2.1 Synthetic population We start with an all-sky, magnitude-limited synthetic stel- lar population generated with galaxia. Output absolute 1 Tiago L. Campante et al. to an astrophysical false positive. For b < 10◦, the density of background stars is very high, meaning that any observed eclipse is more likely to be from a background eclipsing bi- nary, whereas for b > 20◦ planets should represent a ma- jority over false positives2 (Sullivan et al., 2015). Panel (a) of Fig. 3 shows the V -band magnitude distribu- tion of the parent population (peaking at V ∼ 13 -- 14), while panel (b) shows a luminosity-color diagram that may be used to inform target selection. We will likely need to apply a stricter magnitude cut depending on the actual oscillations detectability limit. We also assessed the fraction of stars in the parent population observed over a median of 1 TESS sec- tor (78 %) and 1 or 2 TESS sectors (93 %). Furthermore, we note that for 26 % of the stars νmax is above the Nyquist fre- quency. 3 Automated transit detection: perfor- mance assessment 3.1 Arti(cid:27)cial light curves We generated arti(cid:27)cial light curves for the ∼ 30,000 unique, bona (cid:27)de LLRGB stars in our parent (synthetic) stel- lar population (see Sect. 2). Generation of the light curves is performed originally in the frequency domain, after which an inverse Fourier transform is applied (Kuszlewicz et al., sub- mitted). We consider only the 30-minute cadence of TESS FFIs and apply a window function to account for the data downlink occurring every spacecraft orbit. We used a photometric noise model for TESS (Sullivan et al., 2015; Campante et al., 2016) to predict the rms noise per exposure time. A systematic term of 20 ppm hr1/2 was included in this calculation. To model the granulation power spectral density, we adopted a scaled version (to predict TESS granulation amplitudes) of model F of Kallinger et al. (2014), which contains two Harvey-like components. No aliased granulation power was considered. Individual radial, (mixed) dipole and quadrupole modes were also modeled whenever νmax < νNyq. Panels (a) and (b) of Fig. 4 respectively dis- play the power spectral density (PSD) and corresponding light curve of a V = 10.3 star observed for 27.4 days (or 1 TESS sector). The oscillation bump can be seen around νmax≈ 167 µHz. We generated model transit light curves using the Python package batman3. Assuming circular planetary orbits, we seeded one planet per star. We next drew orbital periods and planet radii from uniform distributions spanning the param- eter space of interest (0.5 to 27.4 days and 4 to 22 R⊕, re- spectively). Orbital periods were redrawn until no systems were left within the Roche limit or the stellar envelope. We assume that all planets transit and draw the impact param- eter from a uniform distribution de(cid:27)ned over the half-open interval [0, 1[. Input to batman includes the time of inferior conjunction, orbital period, planet radius, semi-major axis, and orbital inclination. A quadratic limb darkening law is used and its coe(cid:28)cients set to (cid:27)xed values (see Barclay et al., 2015). We further account for the long integration time by su- persampling the model 11 times per cadence then integrating over these subsamples. 2Note that these remarks were made with reference to planet detections around TESS target stars. 3https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~lkreidberg/ batman/ Zenodo, 2018 Figure 1: Contamination of RC stars in the initial sample. magnitudes were converted to apparent magnitudes and ex- tinction applied. We ended up only retaining stars down to magnitude 13 in the Johnson -- Cousins IC band. Although somewhat optimistic, this magnitude cut is used to ensure that all detectable oscillating LLRGB stars are captured (Cam- pante et al., 2016). Note that the simulation is undersampled by a factor of 10 to ease up on the data handling. We made an initial selection of putative LLRGB stars from this synthetic population by applying the following cuts on log g and Teff: 2.7 < log g < 3.5 and Teff < 5500 K. The upper log g cut ensures that stars are evolved enough to os- cillate with frequencies detectable with 30-minute-cadence data (Chaplin et al., 2014). The lower log g cut is purely em- pirical (Hekker et al., 2011) and leads to contamination of the sample by red clump (RC) stars (on which more below). This step was followed by selecting only those stars located in the southern ecliptic hemisphere. Finally, we determined the median number of sectors (by considering a number of di(cid:29)er- ent initial pointings) over which each star would be observed with TESS using the Python package tvguide1 (each sector corresponds to a 27.4-day coverage), having discarded stars that fall o(cid:29) silicon. The (cid:27)nal tally amounts to ∼ 6.8 × 105 stars (after applying the factor-of-10 correction). We now come back to the issue of the sample contamina- tion by RC stars. Indeed, 34 % of stars in the above sample are RC stars (see Fig. 1). We apply an additional cut on the as- teroseismic observable ∆ν, namely, ∆ν > 10 µHz, in order to mitigate this contamination e(cid:29)ect. This e(cid:29)ectively leads to the removal of all RC stars and is the equivalent to raising the lower log g cut to log g (cid:38) 2.9. We take the resulting sam- ple of bona (cid:27)de LLRGB stars as our (cid:27)nal, parent (synthetic) stellar population, which comprises ∼ 3.0 × 105 stars (after applying the factor-of-10 correction). 2.2 Population characteristics We now look at the main characteristics of this parent (synthetic) stellar population. Figure 2 shows the overall stel- lar radius, mass and metallicity distributions (light red). Dis- tributions are also shown for a subset of stars lying farther away from the Galactic plane, i.e., b > 10◦ (light blue; com- prising 68 % of the parent population). The Galactic latitude of a target strongly in(cid:30)uences the likelihood of it giving rise 1https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/tess/ proposal-tools.html#tvguide 2 2.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.5log g (dex)010002000300040005000CountAllRCLLRGBPHOST "Physics of Oscillating Stars" conference (a) (b) Figure 3: V -band magnitude distribution (a) and luminosity-color diagram (b) of the parent stellar population. The luminosity-color diagram of the parent stellar population (red) is superimposed on that of the initial sample (gray; see Sect. 2.1). 3.2 BLS algorithm We search for transits using an updated version of the pipeline presented in Barros et al. (2016), which makes use of a Python implementation4 of the BLS algorithm originally introduced by Kovács et al. (2002). The search is made over periods ranging from 1 day to 70 % of the light curve dura- tion and over fractional transit durations ranging from 0.001 to 0.3 with nb = 200 phase bins. Frequency sampling is op- timized according to δν = 1/(Pmax · nb), where Pmax is the maximum period searched for. Using the periods and epochs found by the BLS algorithm, each light curve is phase-folded and the signal detection e(cid:28)ciency (SDE; Kovács et al., 2002) computed. The pipeline searches npass transits per light curve and sorts them according to the SDE. Results for all the light curves are also sorted according to the maximum SDE re- ported for each light curve. It also tests for the following features: possibility of a secondary transit/eclipse, sinusoidal behavior, and mono transit (or an e(cid:29)ective number of tran- sits that is less than the total number of transits). Provided 4https://github.com/dfm/python-bls 3 (a) (b) (c) Figure 2: Stellar (a) radius, (b) mass and (c) metallicity distributions of the parent stellar population. Zenodo, 2018 34567Radius (R_Sun)0500100015002000CountAllb>10º0.81.01.21.41.61.82.02.22.4Mass (M_Sun)0100020003000CountAllb>10º-3-2-10[Fe/H] (dex)01000200030004000CountAllb>10º6789101112131415V (mag)010002000300040005000Count0.50.60.70.80.91.01.11.21.31.41.5J-K0.81.01.21.41.61.82.0log (L/L_Sun)Tiago L. Campante et al. Table 1: SDE threshold as a function of the statistical false positive rate. SDE (All) SDE (1 sector) SDE (2 sectors) Rate 0.1 % 1 % 5 % 7.29 6.34 5.61 6.75 5.98 5.33 7.22 6.39 5.73 (a) (b) Figure 4: Power spectral density (a) and corresponding light curve (b) of a V = 10.3 star observed for 27.4 days (or 1 TESS sector). The star has νmax ≈ 167µHz. The resolution of the truncated spectrum (red) is de(cid:27)ned by the duration of the light curve, whereas the orig- inal spectrum (black) is oversampled. No window function has yet been applied to the light curve to account for the data downlink. the (cid:27)tted depth is positive, the pipeline produces a series of plots for each candidate. Figure 5 shows the pipeline output for the same arti(cid:27)cial star considered in Fig. 4 (after transit injection). The two injected transits are correctly recovered. Another example can be found in Fig. 6, where the pipeline output is shown for a V = 13.1 star observed for 54.8 days (or 2 TESS sectors). All three injected transits are correctly recovered. 3.3 Statistical false positives We began by running the pipeline on the ∼ 30,000 gen- erated arti(cid:27)cial light curves (prior to transit injection) in or- der to assess the rate of statistical false positives. Results are shown in Fig. 7. From panel (a), we (cid:27)nd that an SDE threshold of 8.88 produces approximately one statistical false positive over the ∼ 30,000 light curves or a rate of 0.003 %. Table 1 provides SDE thresholds as a function of the statistical false positive rate (0.1 %, 1 % and 5 %). Panels (b) and (c) of Fig. 7 emphasize the dependence of the SDE on the sample's lim- iting magnitude and light curve duration, respectively. The dependence on the latter is particularly obvious, with shorter light curves giving rise to lower SDE values (cf. Kovács et al., 2002). Therefore, Table 1 also provides SDE thresholds when only 27.4- (1 sector) and 54.8-day-long (2 sectors) light curves 4 are considered. 3.4 Detection sensitivity We now run the pipeline on the same ∼ 30,000 arti(cid:27)cial light curves after transit injection in order to assess the de- tection sensitivity (or survey completeness). Figure 8 shows the relative di(cid:29)erence between the injected (Pin) and recov- ered (Pout) orbital periods as a function of the SDE. Vertical dashed lines mark (from right to left) the SDE thresholds cor- responding to 0.1 %, 1 % and 5 % statistical false positive rates when considering 1 TESS sector. The pipeline sometimes recovers half (0.5 ordinate) or double (−1 ordinate) the injected period, which tends to hap- pen close to the aforementioned thresholds. The former sub- set mostly corresponds to the case of two injected transits with an orbital period exceeding 70 % of the light curve du- ration, whereas the latter, less numerous subset mostly cor- responds to those injected transits with periods shorter than 1 day. These injected periods are out of bounds with respect to the search parameters of the algorithm. The remaining, rarer cases seem to be genuine statistical misidenti(cid:27)cations prompted by the low SDE. Figure 9 shows the transit detection sensitivity based on 27.4 days of data and a minimum of two transit events, where we have assumed a statistical false positive rate of 5 %. The resulting contours demonstrate that even for the most pes- simistic case of 27.4 days coverage it will be possible to detect close-in, in(cid:30)ated Jupiters for over 80 % of stars, Jupiter-size planets for 70 -- 80 % of stars, and large Neptunes only in the most favorable cases. 3.4.1 Out-of-transit (cid:30)ux modulation We test for the presence of sinusoidal behavior in the light curve by (cid:27)rst (cid:27)tting a sine function to the binned, folded light curve (on the best period). We then perform a linear regres- sion (after linearization) to obtain the coe(cid:28)cient of determi- nation, r2. Here, we apply this procedure to an arti(cid:27)cial sys- tem resembling the con(cid:27)rmed Kepler-91 planetary system, for which ellipsoidal variations have been measured that are caused by a close-in giant planet (Lillo-Box et al., 2014; Bar- clay et al., 2015). We injected a sine function with period Pin/2 and phase 0 at minimum into the light curve (Pfahl et al., 2008), having varied its amplitude. The star is observed for 27.4 days only (or 1 TESS sector). A notional amplitude of 100 ppm of the ellipsoidal modulation (see Fig. 10) leads to r2 = 0.22, above the r2 = 0.1 threshold adopted within the pipeline to (cid:30)ag potential sinusoidal behavior. This am- plitude is slightly higher than the approximate upper limit of 75 ppm measured for Kepler-91. We conclude by noting that it is usually necessary to remove instrumental trends and rotational modulation due to spots/plages prior to any tran- sit search. Such detrending of the light curve may (depend- ing on the period) also remove part of the out-of-transit (cid:30)ux modulation, thus making detection of ellipsoidal variations more challenging. Zenodo, 2018 PHOST "Physics of Oscillating Stars" conference Figure 5: Pipeline output for the same arti(cid:27)cial star considered in Fig. 4. The light curve is shown in the top left panel with both (correctly) recovered transits in red. Notice the gap at ≈ 13.7 d due to the data downlink. The BLS periodogram is shown in the top right panel with the vertical dashed line indicating the best period, as determined by the algorithm. The bottom left panel displays the phase-folded light curve using the best period (blue) and a binned version of it (red). The bottom middle and right panels simply zoom in on the phase-folded light curve at the locations of the primary and possible secondary, respectively. Figure 6: Pipeline output for a V = 13.1 star observed for 54.8 days (or 2 TESS sectors). Panels are the same as in Fig. 5. 3.4.2 Secondary transit/eclipse We test for the presence of a secondary transit/eclipse by (i) looking for two closely spaced periods (at most 0.5 days apart) and (ii) assessing whether the corresponding depths di(cid:29)er by at least 10 % (relative to the larger of the two depths). The former step also involves checking if a newly detected period matches the 1st overtone of the primary (i.e., /2). Figure 11 illustrates this procedure. The light P primary out Zenodo, 2018 curve has nine injected primary transits. These are easily re- covered during the (cid:27)rst period search despite the clear pres- ence of a secondary at phase 0.5 (see top panel). A planet-to- star (cid:30)ux ratio of 5× 10−4 was assumed when simulating the secondary. Such an arbitrarily large planet-to-star (cid:30)ux ratio -- as a term of comparison, the occultation depth of Kepler- 91b is ∼ 50 ppm -- is employed here for illustrative purposes only and no attention has been paid to determine whether or 5 0.20.00.20.40.60.8Phase0.99850.99900.99951.00001.0005Relative fluxPhase folding for trial period-0.10-0.050.000.050.10Phase0.99850.99900.99951.00001.0005Zooming in for primary search05101520Period [days]0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.4BLS power1e4Periodogram0.400.450.500.550.60Phase0.00050.00100.00150.0020+9.99e1Zooming in for secondary search051015202530Time [days]0.99850.99900.99951.00001.0005Relative fluxLight curvePeriod: 16.89565 SDE: 6.26246Duration: 0.75211 Depth: 0.00067Epoch: 0.33791 Rp/Rs: 0.02579STAR art_231980 MAG 10.2924 PER. SEARCH NO. 10.20.00.20.40.60.8Phase0.9970.9980.9991.0001.0011.002Relative fluxPhase folding for trial period-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.020.000.020.040.060.08Phase0.9970.9980.9991.0001.0011.002Zooming in for primary search0510152025303540Period [days]0.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0BLS power1e4Periodogram0.400.450.500.550.60Phase0.0010.0020.0030.0040.005+9.97e1Zooming in for secondary search0102030405060Time [days]0.9970.9980.9991.0001.0011.002Relative fluxLight curvePeriod: 19.30344 SDE: 9.19455Duration: 0.73683 Depth: 0.00098Epoch: 12.54723 Rp/Rs: 0.03129STAR art_2514657 MAG 13.1009 PER. SEARCH NO. 1Tiago L. Campante et al. Figure 8: Relative di(cid:29)erence between injected (Pin) and recovered (Pout) orbital periods as a function of the SDE. Only systems with two or more detected transits and measured positive depths have been displayed. Vertical dashed lines mark (from right to left) the SDE thresholds corresponding to 0.1 %, 1 % and 5 % statistical false positive rates when considering 1 TESS sector (see Table 1). Systems observed over 1 (gray) or more (green) TESS sectors are identi(cid:27)ed. Figure 9: Transit detection sensitivity based on 27.4 days of data and a minimum of two transit events. We assume a statistical false positive rate of 5 % (or an SDE threshold of 5.33; see Table 1). not it is physically sound. When performing the second pe- riod search (after masking out all primary transits from the light curve), we notice how the BLS power associated with the true period is brought down relative to that of its 1st over- tone (see bottom panel). Detection of the 1st overtone of the primary (after its removal) is a telltale sign of the presence of a secondary transit/eclipse. 4 Candidate ve(cid:29)ing We will be using TESS photometry alone in a (cid:27)rst attempt to separate the expected transit-like signals from (the notion- ally many) astrophysical false positives (due, e.g., to EBs and BEBs) and systematic false alarms. A clear distinction will not always be possible, of course, but this will aid retaining those cases we think are due to genuine transits of short- Zenodo, 2018 (a) (b) (c) Figure 7: Statistical false positive rates. Panel (a): Number of sta- tistical false positives as a function of the SDE. Horizontal dashed lines indicate 1, 10, and 100 false positives. Panels (b) and (c): Nor- malized histograms of the SDE depicting its dependence on limiting magnitude and light curve duration, respectively. 6 24681012140.40.60.81.01.21.41.62468101214Orbital Period (Days)0.40.60.81.01.21.41.6Planet Radius (Jupiter Radii)0.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.924681012140.40.60.81.01.21.41.60.00.30.61.0Fraction of SDE>5.33 DetectionsPHOST "Physics of Oscillating Stars" conference Acknowledgments The project leading to this publication has received fund- ing from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 792848 (PULSATION). This work was supported by FCT -- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnolo- gia through national funds and by FEDER through COM- PETE2020 -- Programa Operacional Competitividade e Inter- nacionalização by these grants: UID/FIS/04434/2013 & POCI- 01-0145-FEDER-007672 and PTDC/FIS-AST/28953/2017 & POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028953. S.C.C.B. acknowledges Inves- tigador FCT contract IF/01312/2014/CP1215/CT0004. The re- search leading to the presented results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007- 2013) / ERC grant agreement no. 338251 (StellarAges). References Barclay, T., Endl, M., Huber, D., Foreman-Mackey, D., Grundahl, F., 2010, Science, 327, 977. Cochran, W. D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 46. 594, A100. Grunblatt, S. K., Huber, D., Gaidos, E., Lopez, E. D., Howard, Chaplin, W. J., Elsworth, Y., Davies, G. R., Campante, T. L., Campante, T. L., Scho(cid:27)eld, M., Kuszlewicz, J. S., Bouma, L., Barros, S. C. C., Demangeon, O., & Deleuil, M. 2016, A&A, Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., Batalha, N., Brown, T., et al. Campante, T. L., Santos, N. C., & Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G. 2018, Asteroseismology and Exoplanets: Listening to the Stars and Searching for New Worlds, 49. Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 138. Handberg, R., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 946. A. W., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 254. B. J., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 185. Fredslund Andersen, M., Christensen- Dalsgaard, J., Antoci, V., Kjeldsen, H., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 142. Hekker, S., Gilliland, R. L., Elsworth, Y., Chaplin, W. J., De Ridder, J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 2594. to the Stars and Searching for New Worlds, 49, 119. et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A41. Huber, D. 2018, Asteroseismology and Exoplanets: Listening Grunblatt, S. K., Huber, D., Gaidos, E. J., Lopez, E. D., Fulton, Kallinger, T., De Ridder, J., Hekker, S., Mathur, S., Mosser, B., Kovács, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 2002, A&A, 391, 369. Lillo-Box, J., Barrado, D., Moya, A., Montesinos, B., Montal- bán, J., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A109. Pfahl, E., Arras, P., & Paxton, B. 2008, ApJ, 679, 783. Rauer, H., Catala, C., Aerts, C., Appourchaux, T., Benz, W., et al. 2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249. Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., Latham, D. W., Bakos, G. Á., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Tele- scopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003. Sharma, S., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Johnston, K. V., & Binney, J. Spergel, D., Gehrels, N., Breckinridge, J., Donahue, M., 2011, ApJ, 730, 3. Dressler, A., et al. 2013, ArXiv e-prints. neau, D., Deming, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 77. Sullivan, P. W., Winn, J. N., Berta-Thompson, Z. K., Charbon- 7 (a) (b) Figure 10: Light curve (a) and phase-folded light curve (b) of an arti(cid:27)cial system resembling the Kepler-91 system. The star is ob- served for 27.4 days (or 1 TESS sector). A sine function with pe- riod Pin/2 and phase 0 at minimum has been injected into the light curve. Its amplitude was set to 100 ppm. An ellipsoidal modulation is clearly seen in the right panel. period gas giants around LLRGB stars. Housekeeping operations such as retaining only those systems with two or more detected transits as well as mea- sured positive depths will be implemented. An SDE threshold will be adopted, its value depending on the number of TESS sectors (cf. Sect. 3.3). Any measured transit depth in excess of 1 % will be attributed to an eclipsing binary (a 2 RJ planet transiting an LLRGB will at most cause a ∼0.5 % (cid:30)ux reduc- tion). As illustrated in the previous section, the pipeline tests for a number of additional features, namely, the presence of a secondary transit/eclipse and sinusoidal behavior. Although not decisive with respect to the vetting procedure, these (cid:30)ags provide useful information that can be used during the de- tailed transit (cid:27)tting. We will pay particular attention, at low SDE, to possible period misidenti(cid:27)cations (due to an out-of- bounds true period or else statistical in nature) by carefully inspecting the light curve and associated BLS periodogram. We also advocate for the independent (cid:27)tting -- as part of the detailed transit (cid:27)tting -- of the phase-folded odd and even primary transits, since a signi(cid:27)cant di(cid:29)erence in their depths may indicate we are dealing with an eclipsing binary. Zenodo, 2018 Tiago L. Campante et al. (a) (b) Figure 11: Pipeline output for a V = 13.0 star observed for 109.6 days (or 4 TESS sectors). A primary (at phase 0) and a secondary (at phase 0.5) were injected into the light curve. Panels refer to the (cid:27)rst (a) and second (b) period search. Notice that all primary transits have been masked out from the light curve prior to the second period search. 8 Zenodo, 2018
1802.07725	2	1802	2018-04-09T15:12:09	Increased Heat Transport in Ultra-Hot Jupiter Atmospheres Through H$_2$ Dissociation/Recombination	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	A new class of exoplanets is beginning to emerge: planets whose dayside atmospheres more closely resemble stellar atmospheres as most of their molecular constituents dissociate. The effects of the dissociation of these species will be varied and must be carefully accounted for. Here we take the first steps towards understanding the consequences of dissociation and recombination of molecular hydrogen (H$_2$) on atmospheric heat recirculation. Using a simple energy balance model with eastward winds, we demonstrate that H$_2$ dissociation/recombination can significantly increase the day$-$night heat transport on ultra-hot Jupiters (UHJs): gas giant exoplanets where significant H$_2$ dissociation occurs. The atomic hydrogen from the highly irradiated daysides of UHJs will transport some of the energy deposited on the dayside towards the nightside of the planet where the H atoms recombine into H$_2$; this mechanism bears similarities to latent heat. Given a fixed wind speed, this will act to increase the heat recirculation efficiency; alternatively, a measured heat recirculation efficiency will require slower wind speeds after accounting for H$_2$ dissociation/recombination.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version April 10, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 8 1 0 2 r p A 9 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 5 2 7 7 0 . 2 0 8 1 : v i X r a Increased Heat Transport in Ultra-Hot Jupiter Atmospheres Through H2 Dissociation/Recombination Taylor J. Bell1, ∗ and Nicolas B. Cowan1, 2, ∗ 1Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 rue University, Montr´eal, QC H3A 2T8, Canada 2Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 rue University, Montr´eal, QC H3A 0E8, Canada (Received 2018 January 30; Revised 2018 April 04; Accepted 2018 April 07) Submitted to ApJL ABSTRACT A new class of exoplanets is beginning to emerge: planets whose dayside atmospheres more closely resemble stellar atmospheres as most of their molecular constituents dissociate. The effects of the dissociation of these species will be varied and must be carefully accounted for. Here we take the first steps towards understanding the consequences of dissociation and recombination of molecular hydrogen (H2) on atmospheric heat recirculation. Using a simple energy balance model with eastward winds, we demonstrate that H2 dissociation/recombination can significantly increase the day–night heat transport on ultra-hot Jupiters (UHJs): gas giant exoplanets where significant H2 dissociation occurs. The atomic hydrogen from the highly irradiated daysides of UHJs will transport some of the energy deposited on the dayside towards the nightside of the planet where the H atoms recombine into H2; this mechanism bears similarities to latent heat. Given a fixed wind speed, this will act to increase the heat recirculation efficiency; alternatively, a measured heat recirculation efficiency will require slower wind speeds after accounting for H2 dissociation/recombination. Keywords: planets and satellites: atmospheres - planets and satellites: gaseous planets - methods: analytical - methods: numerical 1. INTRODUCTION Most gas giant exoplanets have atmospheres domi- nated by molecular hydrogen (H2). However, on planets where the temperature is sufficiently high, a significant fraction of the H2 will thermally dissociate; one may call these planets ultra-hot Jupiters (UHJs). Only a handful of known planets have dayside temperatures this high, but the TESS mission is expected to discover hundreds more as it includes many early-type stars (George Zhou, private communication 2017). These UHJs are an in- teresting intermediate between stars and cooler planets, and they will allow for useful tests of atmospheric mod- els. Corresponding author: Taylor J. Bell [email protected] ∗ McGill Space Institute; Institute for Research on Exoplanets; Centre for Research in Astrophysics of Quebec At these star-like temperatures, the H− bound-free and free-free opacities should play an important role in the continuum atmospheric opacity which has recently been detected in dayside secondary eclipse spectra (Bell et al. 2017; Arcangeli et al. 2018). These recently re- ported detections of H− opacity provide evidence that H2 is dissociating in the atmospheres of gas giants at this temperature range. However, the thermodynamical effects of H2 dissociation/recombination have yet to be explored. Both theoretically (e.g. Perez-Becker & Showman 2013; Komacek & Showman 2016) and empirically (e.g. Zhang et al. 2018; Schwartz et al. 2017), we expect the day–night temperature contrast on hot Jupiters to increase with increasing stellar irradiation; temper- ature gradients (cid:38) 1000 K can be expected for UHJs. As temperatures vary drastically between day and night, the local thermal equilibrium (LTE) H2 disso- ciation fraction will also vary. The recombination of H into H2 is a remarkably exothermic process, releasing 2 Bell & Cowan "Top-Down" View advanced circulation models to explore this problem in a more rigorous and quantitative manner. 2. ENERGY TRANSPORT MODEL 2.1. Heating Terms First, let be the energy per unit area of a parcel of gas. Ignoring H2 dissociation/recombination and any internal heat sources, and assuming the gas parcel cools radiatively, energy conservation gives Figure 1. A cartoon showing a "top-down" view of the expected dissociation and recombination of H2 on an ultra- hot Jupiter (UHJ). The orbital direction and the direction of winds on the planet are indicated with black arrows. q = 2.14×108 J kg−1 (Dean 1999); this is 100× more po- tent than the latent heat of condensation for water. For reference, latent heat is responsible for approximately half of the heat recirculation on Earth (L/(cp∆T ) ∼ 1), while the effect of H2 dissociation/recombination should be even stronger for UHJs (q/(cp∆T ) ∼ 102). Building on this intuition, we might expect that H will recombine into H2 as gas carried by winds flows eastward from the sub-stellar point, significantly heating the east- ern hemisphere of the planet. As the gas continues to flow around to the dayside, the H2 will again dissoci- ate and significantly cool the western hemisphere. A cartoon depicting this layout is shown in Figure 1. If unaccounted for while modelling a phasecurve, this may manifest itself as an "unphysically" large eastward offset as was previously reported for WASP-12b (Cowan et al. 2012). A large number of circulation models have been devel- oped for studying exoplanet atmospheres, ranging from simple energy balance models (e.g. Cowan & Agol 2011) to more advanced general circulation models (e.g. Show- man et al. 2009; Rauscher & Menou 2010; Amundsen et al. 2014; Zhang & Showman 2017; Heng & Kitzmann 2017; Dobbs-Dixon & Cowan 2017). To our knowledge, however, no published general circulation models ac- count for the cooling/heating due to the energies of H2 dissociation/recombination (although some planet for- mation models do account for this, e.g. Berardo et al. 2017). Here we aim to qualitatively explore the effects of H2 dissociation/recombination using a simple energy balance model adapted from that described by Cowan & Agol (2011), using code based on that implemented by Schwartz et al. (2017). We leave it to those with more d dt = Fin − Fout, with Fin and Fout given by Fin = (1 − AB)F∗ sin θ max Fout = σT 4. (cid:16) (cid:17) cos Φ(t), 0 , The planet's Bond albedo is given by AB, θ is the co- latitude of the gas parcel, T is the temperature of the gas parcel, and σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The incoming stellar flux is given by F∗ = σT 4∗,eff (R∗/a)2, where T∗,eff is the stellar effective temperature, R∗ is the stellar radius, and a is the planet's semi-major axis. The stellar hour angle, Φ(t), incorporates both advection and planetary rotation. In order to include H2 dissociation/recombination, we add a new term accounting for the energy flux from these effects. This can be done with d dt = Fin − Fout − dQ dt , (1) where the energy per unit area stored by H2 dissociation is given by Q = qχHΣ, where Σ is the mass per unit area of H and H2 in the parcel of gas (in kg m−2), q = 2.14×108 J kg−1 is the H2 bond dissociation energy per unit mass at 0 K, and χH is the dissociation fraction of the gas. χH = 1 means the gas is completely dissociated (all atomic). Assuming the gas parcel is in hydrostatic equilibrium, we can use (cid:90) ∞ Σ = z0 ρ(z)dz = (P0/g) where z0 is some reference height, P0 is the atmospheric pressure corresponding to z0, and ρ is the density of the gas. This then allows us to rewrite Q as Q = (P0/g)qχH. The time derivative of Q is then dQ dt = (P0/g)q dχH dt = (P0/g)q (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)T dχH dT dT dt , (2) OrbitalDirectionHH2DissociationRecombinationH2 Dissociation/Recombination in UHJs 3 where we have assumed the gas parcel's P0/g remains constant, and where we have made use of the chain rule to expand dχH/dt. We model the LTE H2 dissociation fraction by solving the Saha equation as stated in Appendix A of Berardo et al. (2017) for χH, assuming the atmosphere consists of only H and H2: χH(P, T ) = nH nH + nH2 = 2 1 + √1 + 4Y , (3) where nH and nH2 are the number densities of H and H2, Y = T −3/2 exp(q/2mHkBT )P B h−3Θrot 2(πmH)3/2k5/2 , where mH is the mass of the hydrogen atom, kB is the Boltzmann constant, h is the Planck constant, Θrot = 85.4 K is rotational temperature of H2 (Hill 1986), P is the gas pressure, and T is the tempera- ture of the gas (in K). The LTE dissociation fraction is plotted in the top panel of Figure 2. We can then find dχH/dT using the chain rule: dχH dT = dχH dY dY dT . After some simplification, we then determine (cid:18) 3 2 χ2 HY dχH dT = To a good degree of accuracy, Equations (3) and (4) can be approximated at P = 0.1 bar using T −1 + (q/2mHkB)T −2 √1 + 4Y (cid:32) 1 + erf 1 2 (cid:19)(cid:33) (cid:18) T − µ σ√2 (cid:19) . (4) (5) (6) χH(0.1 bar, T ) = and dχH(0.1 bar, T ) dT = 1 σ√2π e−(T−µ)2/2σ2 where σ = 471 K and µ = 3318 K, and erf is the error function; this approximation offers a 70% increase in computation speed. It should be noted that we assume that this H2 dissociation/recombination occurs instan- taneously since the timescale in the temperature regime of UHJs at 0.1 bar is ∼10−3 s (Rink 1962; Shui 1973). 2.2. Thermal Energy We assume that the planet's energy is stored entirely as thermal energy, as is done in other simple energy balance models (e.g. Cowan & Agol 2011; Pierrehumbert 2010). This assumption means (cid:16) d dt (cid:17) (cpT Σ) = (P0/g)cpT d dt = d dt (cid:18) dT dt (cid:18) = (P0/g) cp + T = (P0/g) dT dt cp + T (cid:19) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)T dcp dt dcp dT (cid:19) . (7) where cp is the specific heat capacity of the gas, we have again assumed the gas parcel's P0/g remains constant, and we have used the chain rule to expand dcp/dt. The specific heat capacity of the gas will change as a function of temperature due to the slightly different val- ues for H and H2 as well as the variations in the specific heat capacity of H2 as a function of temperature (Chase 1998); any model properly accounting for H2 dissoci- ation should account for this effect. In our model, we assume the atmosphere is made entirely of hydrogen and model the specific heat capacity of the gas by assuming it is well mixed so that cp = cp,HχH + cp,H2(1 − χH), where both χH and cp,H2 are functions of temperature. The temperature derivative of cp is then given by (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)T dcp dT = (cp,H − cp,H2 ) dχH dT 2.3. Putting Everything Together Putting together Equations (1), (2) and (7), we get Fin − Fout − (P0/g) = (P0/g) dT dt dT dt q dχH dT cp + T dcp dT (cid:19) . (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)T After solving for dT /dt, we find dT dt = (Fin− Fout)(P0/g) −1 cp + T dcp dT (cid:18) Finally, a gas cell can then be updated using (cid:18) ∆T = (P0/g) ∆t(Fin − Fout) cp + T + q dcp dT dχH dT (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)T (cid:19)−1 . (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)T + q dχH dT (cid:19) . (8) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)T Note that the entire sum in the denominator can instead be thought of as the specific heat capacity of a gas com- prised of a mixture of H and H2 in thermal equilibrium. The relative importance of the terms in this sum are shown in the bottom two panels of Figure 2. (cid:18) (cid:18) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)T . (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)T (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)T (cid:19) 4 Bell & Cowan T∗,eff = 6360 K, R∗ = 1.657 R(cid:12), P = 1.0914203 days (Collins et al. 2017) and AB = 0.27 (Schwartz et al. 2017). We have also assumed a photospheric pressure of 0.1 bar, the approximate pressure probed by NIR ob- servations of WASP-12b (Stevenson et al. 2014), which gives a radiative timescale of a few hours (similar to the observed timescales for eccentric hot Jupiters, e.g. Lewis et al. 2013; de Wit et al. 2016). Wind speeds for WASP-12b have not been directly measured, but typical values for hot Jupiters are on the order of 1 km s−1 (e.g. Koll & Komacek 2017); for that reason, we focus on wind speeds around this order of magnitude. First, let's explore the effects of H2 dissociation/ recombination at a spatially resolved scale. Figure 3 shows temperature and H2 dissociation maps for three different wind speeds. In the limit of infinite wind speeds, there will be no temperature gradients and H2 dissociation/recombination will not play a role. In the limit of an atmosphere in radiative equilibrium (wind speed = 0), there will be no variation in the tempera- ture of a parcel and H2 dissociation/recombination will play no role. Outside of these two unphysical limits, H2 dissociation/recombination will always be occurring somewhere on UHJs. We now consider phasecurve observations - this re- quires that we convolve the planet map with a visibil- ity kernel at each orbital phase (Cowan et al. 2013), which acts as a low-pass filter. Figure 4 shows model phasecurves for three wind speed; this figure shows that H2 dissociation/recombination can have a signifi- cant effect. At a constant wind speed, the first obvi- ously affected observable when accounting for dissoci- ation/recombination is the increased offset of the peak in the phasecurve towards the east (the same direction as the prescribed wind). Another affected observable is the amplitude of the phase variations which is re- duced when H2 dissociation/recombination is included. Also, a Fourier decomposition shows that nearly all of the power in the phasecurves accounting for H2 disso- ciation/recombination is in the first and second order Fourier series terms (1forb and 2forb). Finally, Figure 5 shows the trends in phase offset and nightside temper- ature for two wind speeds, both accounting for and ne- glecting H2 dissociation/recombination. 4. MODEL ASSUMPTIONS With simplistic models, many important effects are necessarily swept under the rug. Here we aim to lift up the rug and shine a light on our assumptions to aid future work. While many of these assumptions will change the quantitative effects of H2 dissociation/ recombination, we expect that the overall qualitative im- Figure 2. Top: The LTE dissociation fraction of H2 in a parcel of gas. Middle: A demonstration of the relative im- portance of the H2 dissociation/recombination term in Equa- tion (8). For 2300 (cid:46) T (cid:46) 4300, the energy absorbed by H2 dissociation is greater than the energy stored as heat. Typ- ical hot Jupiters are too cool to be affected by H2 dissocia- tion/recombination, but these processes should dominate on UHJs. Bottom: An inset showing the specific heat capac- ity of a gas composed of H and H2 in LTE (the same black line from the middle panel), the specific heat capacities of H and H2 where they are able to exist in equilibrium, and the additional T (dcp/dT ) term. All panels assume a pressure of 0.1 bar. 3. SIMULATED OBSERVATIONS AND QUALITATIVE TRENDS We now explore the effects of this new term in the differential equation governing the temperature of a gas cell. For this purpose, we create a latitude+longitude HEALPix grid where each parcel's temperature is up- dated using Equation (8) with code based on that de- veloped by Schwartz et al. (2017). While Cowan & Agol (2011) were able to explore their model using dimensionless quantities, our up- dated model requires that we use dimensioned variables. We therefore adopt the values of the first discovered UHJ, WASP-12b (Hebb et al. 2009). In particular, we set Rp = 1.90 RJ , a = 0.0234 AU, Mp = 1.470 MJ , 0.000.250.500.751.00χ05101520104JK−1kg−1H2Diss.cpTdcpdT100020003000400050006000T(K)012104JK−1kg−1cpcp,H2cp,HTdcpdTH2 Dissociation/Recombination in UHJs 5 0.1 km s−1 Equatorial Zonal Wind Speeds 1.0 km s−1 10 km s−1 Temperature Maps H2 Dissociation Maps Figure 3. Planetary maps, showing temperature and H2 dissociation fraction, assuming different eastward zonal wind speeds. The dayside hemisphere is shown on the left side of each map with north at the top. Figure 4. Model bolometric phasecurves assuming different eastward zonal wind velocities, ignoring eclipses and tran- sits. The thick, red lines show the expected phasecurve ac- counting for H2 dissociation/recombination, while the thin- ner, black models neglect these processes. Secondary eclipse would occur at a phase of 0.0, while a transit would occur at 0.5. (cid:112)R∗/a), given theoretical bolomet- Figure 5. A figure showing the trends in nightside appar- ent temperature and phase offset as a function of irradiation temperature (T0 ≡ T∗,eff ric phasecurve measurements. Thick, red lines show mod- els including H2 dissociation/recombination for WASP-12b, while thin, black lines show models neglecting these effects. Models sharing the same wind speed share linestyles, and all models assume a Bond albedo of 0.3 (which is typical for hot Jupiters; Zhang et al. 2018; Schwartz et al. 2017). A vertical dotted line shows the location of WASP-12b. 500150025003500T(K)500150025003500T(K)500150025003500T(K)0.00.51.0χ0.00.51.0χ0.00.51.0χ0200400600800Fp/F∗(ppm)0.1kms−10200400600800Fp/F∗(ppm)1.0kms−10.00.20.40.60.81.0OrbitalPhase0200400600800Fp/F∗(ppm)10kms−1050010001500200025003000Tnight(K)vwind=10kms−1vwind=1kms−120003000400050006000T0(K)0◦10◦20◦30◦40◦50◦60◦BolometricPhaseOffset6 Bell & Cowan pact of increased heat recirculation will be robust to these assumptions. One important piece of physics that we have ignored (beyond a simple assumption of a 0.1 bar photosphere) is atmospheric opacity. As Dobbs-Dixon & Cowan (2017) demonstrated, variations in opacity sources as a function of longitude can change the depth of the photosphere by an order of magnitude or more. Changing the H2 dis- sociation fraction will change the importance of H− as an opacity source, and other standard opacity sources (e.g. H2O and CO) will also likely be important, es- pecially towards the cooler nightside. The insignificant detection of H2O on the dayside of WASP-12b (Steven- son et al. 2014) but significant detection in the planet's transmission spectrum (Kreidberg et al. 2015) clearly demonstrates that opacity sources should be expected to change on UHJs. Several of the standard molecular opacity sources will also overlap with the far broader H− absorption, which complicates a definitive detec- tion of H− using broadband photometry, such as with Spitzer /IRAC. The formation of clouds on the nightside of the planet would further complicate the interpreta- tion of observed phasecurves, increasing the albedo of the west terminator while also insulating the nightside. While we have accounted for variations in the radiative timescale as a function of temperature, we have not ac- counted for changes due to varying opacity sources. Additionally, as we have assumed all photons are emit- ted at a 0.1 bar photosphere, the effects of the atmo- sphere's T-P profile have been neglected. As the H2 dissociation fraction has a fairly weak dependence on gas pressure, the bulk of vertical variations in the H2 dissociation fraction will likely be controlled by the ver- tical temperature gradient. Due to the lower density of the dissociated gas, one may expect vertical advection on UHJs where temperature decreases with altitude. In- terestingly, however, observations of most UHJs are best explained by atmospheres with thermal inversions (Ar- cangeli et al. 2018; Evans et al. 2017) or at least approx- imately isothermal profiles on the dayside (Crossfield et al. 2012; Cowan et al. 2012). Any non-isothermal T-P profile will alter the specifics of how efficiently heat is re- distributed across the planet as different layers in a gas column will dissociate/recombine at different locations. Also, as we have neglected atmospheric opacity, we have assumed that each gas parcel emits as a blackbody with a single temperature. Further, due to the changing scale height of the at- mosphere at different latitudes and longitudes due to changes in temperature and H2 dissociation fraction, there will likely be a tendency for gas to flow away from the sub-stellar point both zonally and meridionally. This is not accounted for in our toy model and would re- quire a general circulation model. Instead, we have cho- sen eastward winds as they are predicted, and seen, for most hot Jupiters (e.g. Showman & Guillot 2002; Zhang et al. 2018), although there are some exceptions (e.g. Dang et al. 2018). Similarly, our assumption of solid- body atmospheric rotation is clearly an over simplifica- tion which will need to be addressed in future work. Our model is also unable to predict the wind speeds of UHJs which would require the implementation of various drag sources, such as magnetic drag which Menou (2012) sug- gests will dominate at these high temperatures. Also, we have assumed all heating is due to H2 dis- sociation and radiation from the host star, neglecting other heat sources such as residual heat from formation (which should be negligible for planets older than 1 Gyr; Burrows et al. 2006) as well as tidal, viscous, and ohmic heating. We have also neglected the presence of helium which will partially dilute the strength of H2 dissoci- ation/recombination as only ∼80% of the atmosphere will be hydrogen. Finally, we have assumed that the planet has a uniform albedo which will not be the case in general (e.g. Esteves et al. 2013; Demory et al. 2013; Angerhausen et al. 2015; Parmentier et al. 2016). 5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS A new class of exoplanets is beginning to emerge: planets whose dayside atmospheres resemble stellar at- mospheres as their molecular constituents thermally dis- sociate. The impacts of this dissociation will be var- ied and must be carefully accounted for. Here we have shown that the dynamical dissociation and recombina- tion of H2 will play an important role in the heat re- circulation of ultra-hot Jupiters. In the atmospheres of ultra-hot Jupiters, significant H2 dissociation occurs on the highly irradiated dayside, absorbing some of the incident stellar energy and transporting it towards the nightside of the planet where the gas recombines. Given a fixed wind speed, this will act to increase the heat recirculation efficiency; alternatively, a measured heat recirculation efficiency will require slower wind speeds once H2 dissociation/recombination has been accounted for. Both theoretically and observationally, it has been shown that increasing irradiation tends to lead to poorer heat recirculation (e.g. Komacek & Showman 2016; Schwartz et al. 2017). However, there are a few no- table exceptions to this rule at high temperatures. Re- cently, Zhang et al. (2018) reported a heat recirculation efficiency of ε ∼ 0.2 for the UHJ WASP-33b which is far higher than would be predicted by theoretical and observational trends. WASP-12b may also possess an H2 Dissociation/Recombination in UHJs 7 unusually high heat recirculation efficiency and exhibit a greater phase offset than would be expected from sim- ple heat advection1 (Cowan et al. 2012). However, the power in the second order Fourier series terms from H2 dissociation/recombination seems to make the phase- curve more sharply peaked and does not seem to be able to explain the double-peaked phasecurve seen for WASP-12b by Cowan et al. (2012). Also, while Ar- cangeli et al. (2018) find evidence of H2 dissociation/ recombination in the atmosphere of WASP-18b, Maxted et al. (2013) finds the planet has minimal day–night heat recirculation. Given the expected increase in heat recir- culation due to H2 dissociation/recombination, this sug- gests that WASP-18b has only moderate winds and/or is too cool for these processes to play a strong role in the heat recirculation of this planet. Finally, near-infrared observations of KELT-9b, the hottest UHJ currently known (Gaudi et al. 2017), could provide a fantastic test of this theory in the very high temperature regime. T.J.B. acknowledges support from the McGill Space Institute Graduate Fellowship and from the FRQNT through the Centre de recherche en astrophysique du Qu´ebec. The atmospheric model we use in this work is based upon code originally developed by Diana Jovmir and Joel Schwartz. We also thank Gabriel Marleau and Ian Dobbs-Dixon for their helpful insights. We have also made use of free and open-source software provided by the Python, SciPy, and Matplotlib communities. REFERENCES Amundsen, D. S., Baraffe, I., Tremblin, P., et al. 2014, de Wit, J., Lewis, N. K., Langton, J., et al. 2016, ApJL, A&A, 564, A59 820, L33 Angerhausen, D., DeLarme, E., & Morse, J. A. 2015, PASP, 127, 1113 Dean, J. 1999, Langes handbook of chemistry, 36 Demory, B.-O., de Wit, J., Lewis, N., et al. 2013, ApJL, Arcangeli, J., Desert, J.-M., Line, M. R., et al. 2018, ArXiv 776, L25 e-prints, arXiv:1801.02489 Bell, T. J., Nikolov, N., Cowan, N. B., et al. 2017, ApJL, Dobbs-Dixon, I., & Cowan, N. B. 2017, ApJL, 851, L26 Esteves, L. J., De Mooij, E. J. W., & Jayawardhana, R. 847, L2 2013, ApJ, 772, 51 Berardo, D., Cumming, A., & Marleau, G.-D. 2017, ApJ, Evans, T. M., Sing, D. K., Kataria, T., et al. 2017, Nature, 834, 149 Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., & Hubeny, I. 2006, ApJ, 650, 1140 Chase, M. W. 1998, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Monograph 9, 1 Collins, K. A., Kielkopf, J. F., & Stassun, K. G. 2017, AJ, 153, 78 Cowan, N. B., & Agol, E. 2011, ApJ, 729, 54 Cowan, N. B., Fuentes, P. A., & Haggard, H. M. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2465 Cowan, N. B., Machalek, P., Croll, B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 82 548, 58 Gaudi, B. S., Stassun, K. G., Collins, K. A., et al. 2017, Nature, 546, 514 Hebb, L., Collier-Cameron, A., Loeillet, B., et al. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1920 Heng, K., & Kitzmann, D. 2017, ApJS, 232, 20 Hill, T. L. 1986, An Introduction to Statistical Thermodynamics (Dover, New York) Koll, D. D. B., & Komacek, T. D. 2017, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1712.07643 Komacek, T. D., & Showman, A. P. 2016, ApJ, 821, 16 Kreidberg, L., Line, M. R., Bean, J. L., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 66 Crossfield, I. J. M., Barman, T., Hansen, B. M. S., Tanaka, I., & Kodama, T. 2012, ApJ, 760, 140 Lewis, N. K., Knutson, H. A., Showman, A. P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 95 Dang, L., Cowan, N. B., Schwartz, J. C., et al. 2018, ArXiv Maxted, P. F. L., Anderson, D. R., Doyle, A. P., et al. e-prints, arXiv:1801.06548 2013, MNRAS, 428, 2645 1 Depending on the decorrelation method used to reduce the Spitzer /IRAC data for WASP-12b, the planet either has ε ∼ 0 or ε ∼ 0.5 (Cowan et al. 2012; Schwartz et al. 2017); although the former is the preferred model, further observations are critical to definitively choose between these values and test the predictions made in this article. Menou, K. 2012, ApJ, 745, 138 Parmentier, V., Fortney, J. J., Showman, A. P., Morley, C., & Marley, M. S. 2016, ApJ, 828, 22 Perez-Becker, D., & Showman, A. P. 2013, ApJ, 776, 134 Pierrehumbert, R. T. 2010, Principles of Planetary Climate Rauscher, E., & Menou, K. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1334 8 Bell & Cowan Rink, J. P. 1962, JChPh, 36, 262 Schwartz, J. C., Kashner, Z., Jovmir, D., & Cowan, N. B. 2017, ApJ, 850, 154 Showman, A. P., Fortney, J. J., Lian, Y., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 564 Showman, A. P., & Guillot, T. 2002, A&A, 385, 166 Shui, V. H. 1973, JChPh, 58, 4868 Stevenson, K. B., Bean, J. L., Madhusudhan, N., & Harrington, J. 2014, ApJ, 791, 36 Zhang, M., Knutson, H. A., Kataria, T., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 83 Zhang, X., & Showman, A. P. 2017, ApJ, 836, 73
1806.09160	1	1806	2018-06-24T14:58:22	Evolution of Titan s high-altitude aerosols under ultraviolet irradiation	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The Cassini-Huygens space mission revealed that Titan s thick brownish haze is initiated high in the atmosphere at about 1000 km of altitude, before a slow transportation down to the surface. Close to the surface at altitudes below 130 km, the Huygens probe provided information on the chemical composition of the haze. So far we do not have insights on a possible photochemical evolution of the aerosols composing the haze during their descent. We address here this atmospheric aerosol aging process, simulating in the laboratory how solar vacuum-ultraviolet (VUV) irradiation affects the aerosol optical properties as probed by infrared spectroscopy. An important evolution is found, which could explain the apparent contradiction between the nitrogen-poor infrared spectroscopic signature observed by Cassini below 600 km of altitude in Titan s atmosphere, and a high nitrogen content as measured by the Aerosol Collector and Pyroliser of Huygens probe at the surface of Titan.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Evolution of Titan's high-altitude aerosols under ultraviolet irradiation Authors: Nathalie Carrasco1,2, Sarah Tigrine1,3, Lisseth Gavilan1, Laurent Nahon3, Murthy S. Gudipati4 Affiliations 1LATMOS/IPSL, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, CNRS, Guyancourt, France. 2Institut Universitaire de France, France. 3SOLEIL, l'Orme des Merisiers, St Aubin, BP48, F-91192 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France. 4Science Division, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Science Division, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109, USA. Correspondence to [email protected] Abstract: The Cassini-Huygens space mission revealed that Titan's thick brownish haze is initiated high in the atmosphere at about 1000 km of altitude, before a slow transportation down to the surface. Close to the surface at altitudes below 130 km, the Huygens probe provided information on the chemical composition of the haze. So far we do not have insights on a possible photochemical evolution of the aerosols composing the haze during their descent. We address here this atmospheric aerosol aging process, simulating in the laboratory how solar vacuum-ultraviolet (VUV) irradiation affects the aerosol optical properties as probed by infrared spectroscopy. An important evolution is found, which could explain the apparent contradiction between the nitrogen-poor infrared spectroscopic signature observed by Cassini below 600 km of altitude in Titan's atmosphere, and a high nitrogen content as measured by the Aerosol Collector and Pyroliser of Huygens probe at the surface of Titan. Introduction: Only one natural satellite in the solar system hosts a dense atmosphere, Titan the largest satellite of Saturn. With a pressure of about 1.5 bars at the surface, the atmosphere is mainly composed of molecular nitrogen and methane. The photochemistry of these two molecules produces a multitude of heavy organic molecules leading to solid aerosols, responsible for the brownish haze surrounding Titan. The methane concentration is close to 2 % in the stratosphere1 (40-320 km) which contains most of the mass of the organic haze. NASA's Cassini space mission enabled to observe the aerosols up to 1000 km in Titan's atmosphere thanks to the UVIS spectrometer 2, revealing that Titan's aerosols are created in the ionosphere, a sub-layer of the thermosphere where positive and negative ions are produced through solar ultraviolet radiations and magnetospheric electrons from Saturn 3,4. The large negative ions have been identified as embryos of aerosols 5. These nanoparticles aggregate and sediment6 leading to the haze observed by the Cassini Imaging Science Subsystem7 and close to the surface by the Descent Imager and Spectral Radiometer of the Huygens probe 8. Pre-Cassini modeling studies suspected a possible aging of the aerosols through UV radiation or particle impact9,10 without knowing at that time that aerosols embryos were initiated at altitudes as high as a thousand of kilometers. Yet in the thermosphere highly energetic photons are present: solar Vacuum-UltraViolet (VUV) flux with wavelengths lower than 200 nm. These photons could affect the chemical composition of the aerosols since their formation and as a result the aerosol albedo, impacting the radiative budget of Titan's atmosphere. Our aim is to address experimentally the key issue of the photochemical aging of the aerosols in the thermosphere where VUV photons still reach, knowing that the aerosols descent in the thermosphere, between 1000 and 600 km, lasts one Titanian day (that is about 11 terrestrial days) 6. We will focus on the evolution of their infrared signatures as a sensitive probe of bond breaking and chemical rearrangement. Those signatures will be compared to the spectra gathered by the Cassini-VIMS instrument in atmospheric layers below the thermosphere. 2 Results: The goal of this work is to determine if irradiation at wavelengths representative of the thermosphere may impact the chemical composition of the aerosols. The photochemical aging process is simulated in our laboratory experiments by exposing Titan's aerosol analogs to VUV synchrotron radiation (see Fig. 1). Several analogues of Titan's aerosols can be considered with different properties and chemical structures11. In this founding work, we focussed on one type of sample for consistency. The exploration of the same irradiation process on other possible analogues will be valuable in the future. We have therefore synthesized a set of samples similar in size and composition to investigate the effect of the VUV-radiation processing on the freshly formed aerosols. Twenty film samples with 440 ± 20 nm thicknesses have been prepared during the same experiment on Si substrates following the protocol detailed in the Methods section. In the thermosphere aerosols are submitted to solar energetic VUV photons. The absorption by the atmospheric components leads to an altitude dependent VUV spectrum. Depending on the altitude where the interaction occurs during their descent, the aerosols will be irradiated with photons of different major wavelengths. We have chosen two irradiation wavelengths to experimentally simulate the evolution of the aerosols in the thermosphere: 95 nm representative of hard photons at about 1000 km and 121.6 nm (Lyman-α) a major VUV contribution in the solar spectrum penetrating down to 600 km 12. We have obtained these wavelengths at the VUV DESIRS beamline of SOLEIL synchrotron 13. The total VUV-UV solar flux density at Titan is about 1014 photons cm-2 s-1 (solar irradiance reference spectra at 1 A.U. 14, attenuated by 0.011 due to the distance from the Sun), whereas the DESIRS beamline provides a photon flux density of 1016 photons cm-2 s-1. We have therefore chosen irradiation times of a few hours to simulate the irradiation occurring during one Titan-day. The evolution of the infrared signatures of the organic films was characterized by ex-situ infrared absorption spectroscopy in the 1200-3500 cm-1 wavenumber range. The non-irradiated films have been characterized in earlier publications15. Vibration modes of double bonds C=C and C=N are found in the 1500-1600 cm-1 range. Triple bonds nitrile -C≡N and isonitrile -N≡C have their vibration modes peaked at about 2200 cm-1. N-H amine functions show a large absorption band in the 2700-3700 cm-1 range. And stretching modes of C-H alkyl signatures leads to sharp bands between 2700 and 3000 cm-1 (-CH3 symmetric and asymmetric and -CH2- asymmetric). Initial spectra preceding the irradiation experiments were taken for each organic thin film and normalized at about 1550 cm-1 where the highest absorption value is observed. They are given in Fig 2 as an envelope capturing the dispersion (twice the standard deviation), and. We focus on the evolution of three main chemical functions: nitrile bonds R-CN (and isonitrile R-NC) at ~2200 cm-1 (2100-2300 cm-1), C-H bonds at ~2950 cm-1 (2800-3050 cm-1), and amine N-H bonds at ~3200 cm-1 (3050-3500 cm-1). We find an absorbance dispersion for these three regions of 5% for nitrile bonds, 15% for C-H bonds, and 10% for N-H bonds. The effect of VUV irradiation is illustrated in Fig. 2 with the comparison of the absorbance spectra of a single sample before and after 24 hours irradiation at 121.6 nm. We observe a general decrease of the targeted signatures, nitrile functions, C-H bonds and N-H bonds. The time-evolution of this effect is reported in Fig. 3 (upper panel). Given the variability of these three absorption features, the decrease becomes significant for only 2 hours of irradiation for the 3 nitrile functions, while more than 20 hours of irradiation are needed to induce a modification of the C-H and N-H bonds. The samples irradiated at 95 nm evolve similarly, with significant changes observed at shorter irradiation durations only for the nitrile functional group. The kinetics data of the nitrile decrease are compared for the two wavelengths irradiations (95 nm and 121.6 nm) in Fig.3. As expected with the higher energy dose provided at 95 nm, absorption of the nitrile group decreases faster and more significant with 95 nm irradiation than with 121.6 nm. A loss of 17 ± 5% is obtained at 95 nm after 2 hours of irradiation, which is about twice compared to the one observed at 121.6 nm. Depending on the wavelength, photons penetrate differently the solid sample. This effect is quantified by the penetration depth, D(λ). At this layer thickness, the initial radiation intensity is attenuated by a factor 1/e. The penetration depth of our organic sample is not precisely known. An approximation can be obtained from the imaginary part k of the VUV refractive index obtained for another similar material 16. Given the equation , penetration depths of D(λ) = λ 4πk 26 nm and 11 nm are thus expected for radiation at Lyman-α and 95 nm respectively. The effective layer thickness affected by the radiation is considered at four times the penetration depth with a residual radiation of 2%. The short penetration depth of VUV photons means that these photons are effective up to 100 nm of the 440 nm thick sample during VUV irradiation. Due to the short VUV penetration depth, the material is composed after radiation of two components: ~20% of the total thickness, which has been irradiated and ~80% which did not receive VUV photons. Both components contribute to the total infrared transmission signal of the material after VUV radiation. The experimental 15-20% IR signature attenuation observed on Figure 3 is similar to the thickness contribution of the irradiated layer, showing that the irradiated layer possesses totally different IR properties from the non-irradiated layer. The 95 nm wavelength has been chosen as a typical wavelength below 100 nm simulating the hard irradiation occurring at about 1000 km of altitude 17. Yet at about 1000 km, the aerosols initiate their production and reach nanometer-scale dimensions 6,18. The effect observed with aerosol analogs irradiated at 95 nm will therefore involve a photochemical aging of the aerosols since the very beginning of their formation process. Below 1000 km, we have shown that the evolution process is still active by lower energy radiation such as Lyman-α. A strong modification of Titan aerosol infrared signature is therefore expected through solar VUV aging all along the aerosols sedimentation in Titan's thermosphere. 4 If we focus on the 2100-2300 cm-1 wavenumber range, an evolution of the shape of the structure is detected in addition to a change in the intensity. A deconvolution into four gaussian components enables to characterize this evolution (Fig. 4). Peak spectral position are considered as free parameters during the gaussian fit procedure in order to take into account possible changes in the chemical arrangement from the irradiation. They are found centered at 2110, 2140, 2180 and 2240 cm-1 in both cases, with a limited spectral shift between the initial and the irradiated sample (Table 1). According to previous studies 19,20, these components can be attributed to aromatic isonitrile (Ar-NC) at 2110 cm-1, aliphatic isonitrile (R-NC) at 2140 cm-1, conjugated nitrile (C=C-CN) at 2180 cm-1 and aliphatic nitrile (R-CN) at 2240 cm-1. There was a debate on the component at 2180 cm-1 with a first attribution by Mutsukura and Akita 21 to isonitrile R-NC structures but, since this wavenumber was found at the upper limit of the isonitrile region, it is more compatible with a conjugated nitrile signature 19,20. A component for aromatic nitriles is found at about 2230 cm-1 for similar materials in the literature 19,21, but is negligible in our case, implying that nitrile termination functions are rarely supported by aromatic rings. The integrated areas of the 2110, 2140 and 2240 cm-1 components evolve upon irradiation at Lyman-α during 24 hrs (see Table 1). The difference observed in the 2100-2300 cm-1 region is based on a significant decrease of the single component centered at 2180 cm-1, by about 30%. This component attributed to conjugated nitriles is singularly affected by the VUV irradiation at Lyman-α and 95 nm. This result is to be compared with the spectral evolution observed after soft X-ray irradiation of similar aerosol analogs reported in Gavilan et al. 22. The same conjugated nitrile component at 2180 cm-1 decreased after X-ray exposure, but an aromatization was simultaneously observed with an important increase of the aromatic nitrile component at 2230 cm-1. This is an important difference between the respective effects of VUV and X-ray irradiations: aromatization of the conjugated nitriles is much smaller under VUV irradiation. A decrease of the conjugate nitrile contribution with minimal effect on the other nitrile or isonitrile signatures in the material involves a loss of this specific nitrile component through a possible breakage of the C-C bond between the double C=C bond and the nitrile termination function. CN and/or HCN losses are expected through this process. Note that in the context of Titan's atmospheric photochemistry, the contribution of X-rays can be neglected, in terms of flux and absorption cross sections, compared to the photochemistry driven by the VUV photons reaching the upper atmosphere of Titan. 5 The large 2700-3700 cm-1 signature of the N-H stretching modes of primary and secondary amine functions decreases after VUV irradiation. This decay is explained by VUV photodissociation of amines (primary and secondary), initiated by Rydberg excitations. Tertiary amines are less photolysed as they stabilise by fluorescence. Primary and secondary amines are therefore depleted, leading to new N-containing functions such as tertiary amines and/or imine. The production of imine functional groups, C=N, is also consistent with the absorbance increase in the 1500 cm-1 region. In this process, hydrogen atoms are lost. The consequence is that N-H amine functions are actually consumed, but with no nitrogen loss. After VUV aging, the samples remain nitrogen-rich, but amine-poor. The sharper bands of the C-H signatures in the 2800-3050 cm-1 region show a change in their distribution after irradiation. To characterise the C-H absorption intensities alone, the underlying amine absorption band is substracted after interpolation by a linear model in the 2800-3200 cm-1 wavenumber range (Fig. 5). The C-H feature is composed of three main components centered at 2881 cm-1 (CH3 symmetric stretching), 2938 cm-1 (CH2 asymmetric stretching) and 2965 cm-1 (CH3 asymmetric stretching) 19. After 24hrs of irradiation the intensities of the three components decrease by about 20-30%. This evolution is in agreement with a H-loss of the organic material through VUV photolysis 23. The decrease is more pronounced for the CH2 groups than the CH3 ones inferring an increase of the CH3/CH2 ratio. This evolution of the CH3/CH2 ratio after irradiation is relevant to the aerosol signature in Titan atmosphere as measured by the Cassini Visible and Imaging Mapping spectrometer 24 at altitude ~ 200 km. A slight shift of a few cm-1 also appears for the three components after irradiation typical of a change in the chemical environment of the C-H bonds. A similar positive shift has been observed in the C-H stretching signatures of series of molecules, either through steric effects increasing hydrogen-hydrogen interactions within the material 25 or by the substitution of the adjacent carbon by a nitrogen atom 26. The interactions with both an opposing hydrogen atom or an adjacent nitrogen lone electron pair hinder the C-H stretch, which requires more energy to occur. The cross-linking of our N-rich material under VUV irradiation would be consistent with both steric and nitrogen effects. Before and after irradiation we note the absence of C-H stretching modes supported by aromatic rings around 3000 cm-1 20. The presence of signatures above 3000 cm-1 in the VIMS data measured at about 200 km (Fig. 5) is therefore not explained by the VUV processing of the aerosols in Titan's thermosphere. Other processes should be invoked to explain this feature such as an aromatic component already present before VUV processing in Titan's thermosphere. Finally, in the 1500 cm-1 region we find an increase in the absorption of the peak at 1570 cm-1, as seen in Fig. 2. In this region absorption is due to -C=C- or –C=N- functional groups. We interpret the increase in this absorption as due to radiation-induced cross-linking of polymers in the film. This is the only spectral region that showed an increase in the absorption, indicative of formation of new bonds. 6 Discussion: The evolution highlighted in this work may also reconcile the contradictory observations on Titan aerosols made by instruments on Cassini and Huygens at different altitudes in the atmosphere. At the surface, the organic haze has been chemically probed by the ACP instrument during the descent of Huygens (Aerosol Collector and Pyrolyzer). ACP reveals a refractory nucleus rich in nitrogen 27. The nucleus has been initiated high in the atmosphere: it originates from the nanometric-scale aerosol embryos produced in the ionosphere. The exact chemical composition of the embryos is not given by any direct Cassini measurements in Titan ionosphere, but consistent data support a nitrogen-rich composition involving amine functions. First the fast ion- driven chemistry occuring in Titan ionosphere builds large nitrogen-rich positive and negative ions 28-30. Then ammonia is an abundant molecule in Titan ionosphere 31 and a possible important gas-phase contributor to the formation of amine functions in the aerosols 32. And finally analogs of Titan ionospheric aerosols produced with plasma discharge in N2-CH4 gas mixtures also confirm an important amine signatures 15,19. This aerosol nitrogen content observed at the surface and strongly suspected in the upper atmosphere seems to disagree with observations in the stratosphere made by infrared spectroscopy. The aerosols as seen by Cassini-VIMS in the 2900-3000 cm-1 wavenumber region have mainly a signature of aliphatic C-H bonds 33 and the underlying amine contribution expected for N-rich aerosols in this wavenumber range remains hardly detectable. The experimental evidence of the VUV effect on analogs of Titan upper atmospheric aerosols enables to resolve this apparent contradiction. Chemical growth processes in the upper atmosphere lead to nitrogen-rich species, as revealed by Cassini INMS 30. The embryos of aerosols produced in this environment are therefore expected to be N-rich, also in agreement with our laboratory analogs showing various nitrogen-containing functions: imines, nitriles and isonitriles, and amines. This work provides evidence that VUV photochemistry with wavelengths below 150 nm could deplete the sensible primary and secondary amine functions of aerosols in the upper atmosphere. This would be consistent with the VIMS and CIRS measurements in the stratosphere, which show no evidence of these functions. The irradiation effect does preserve nitrogen-bearing functionalities that are more strongly bound in the aerosol skeleton, such as tertiary amines, imines and nitriles (except conjugated nitriles). This chemical transformation of the aerosol composition would thus allow the CIRS and VIMS results to agree with the high nitrogen content reported by the Huygens-ACP instrument close to the surface. 7 References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Niemann, H. B. et al. The abundances of constituents of Titan's atmosphere from the GCMS instrument on the Huygens probe. Nature 438, 779-784 (2005). Koskinen, T. T. et al. The mesosphere and lower thermosphere of Titan revealed by Cassini/UVIS stellar occultations. Icarus 216, 507-534 (2011). Lavvas, P. et al. Aerosol growth in Titan's ionosphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2013). Waite Jr., J. H. et al. The Process of Tholin Formation in Titan's Upper Atmosphere. Science 316, 870-875 (2007). Coates, A. J. et al. Discovery of heavy negative ions in Titan's ionosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L22103 (2007). Lavvas, P., Sander, M., Kraft, M. & Imanaka, H. Surface Chemistry and Particle Shape: Processes for the Evolution of Aerosols in Titan's Atmosphere. The Astrophysical Journal 728, 80 (2011). Porco, C. C. et al. Imaging of Titan from the Cassini spacecraft. Nature 434, 159-168 (2005). Tomasko, M. G. et al. A model of Titan's aerosols based on measurements made inside the atmosphere. Planetary and Space Science 56, 669-707 (2008). Dimitrov, V. & Bar-Nun, A. Aging of Titan's Aerosols. Icarus 156, 530-538 (2002). Dimitrov, V. & Bar-Nun, A. Hardening of Titan's aerosols by their charging. Icarus 166, 440-443 (2003). Cable, M. L. et al. Titan Tholins: Simulating Titan Organic Chemistry in the Cassini-Huygens Era. Chem. Rev. 112, 1882-1909 (2012). Hörst, S. M. Titan's atmosphere and climate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 122, 432- 482 (2017). Nahon, L. et al. DESIRS: a state-of-the-art VUV beamline featuring high resolution and variable polarization for spectroscopy and dichroism at SOLEIL. J. Synchrotron Rad. 19, 508-520 (2012). Thuillier, G. et al. Solar irradiance reference spectra for two solar active levels. Advances in Space Research 34, 256-261 (2004). Gautier, T. et al. Mid- and far-infrared absorption spectroscopy of Titan's aerosols analogues. Icarus 221, 320-327 (2012). Khare, B. N. et al. Optical constants of organic tholins produced in a simulated Titanian atmosphere: From soft x-ray to microwave frequencies. Icarus 60, 127-137 (1984). Lavvas, P. et al. Energy deposition and primary chemical products in Titan's upper atmosphere. Icarus 213, 233-251 (2011). López-Puertas, M. et al. Large Abundances of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Titan's Upper Atmosphere. The Astrophysical Journal 770, 132 (2013). Imanaka, H. et al. Laboratory experiments of Titan tholin formed in cold plasma at various pressures: implications for nitrogen-containing polycyclic aromatic compounds in Titan haze. Icarus 168, 344-366 (2004). Quirico, E. et al. New experimental constraints on the composition and structure of tholins. Icarus 198, 218-231 (2008). Mutsukura, N. & Akita, K.-i. Infrared absorption spectroscopy measurements of amorphous CNx films prepared in CH4/N2 r.f. discharge. Thin Solid Films 349, 115-119 (1999). Gavilan, L. et al. X-Ray-induced Deuterium Enrichment of N-rich Organics in Protoplanetary Disks: An Experimental Investigation Using Synchrotron Light. The Astrophysical Journal 840, 35 (2017). Skurat, V. Vacuum ultraviolet photochemistry of polymers. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 208, 27-34 (2003). Kim, S. J. et al. Retrieval and tentative indentification of the 3 µm spectral feature in Titan's haze. Planetary and Space Science 59, 699-704 (2011). 8 Mattioda, A. L. et al. Infrared vibrational and electronic transitions in the dibenzopolyacene family. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 130, 639-652 (2014). Mattioda, A. L. et al. Infrared spectroscopy of matrix-isolated neutral polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles: The acridine series. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 181, 286-308 (2017). Israel, G. et al. Complex organic matter in Titan's atmospheric aerosols from in situ pyrolysis and analysis. Nature 438, 796-799 (2005). Carrasco, N., Westlake, J., Pernot, P. & Waite Jr, H. in The Early Evolution of the Atmospheres of Terrestrial Planets 145-154 (Springer New York, 2013). Vuitton, V. et al. Negative ion chemistry in Titan's upper atmosphere. Planetary and Space Science 57, 1558-1572 (2009). Vuitton, V., Yelle, R. V. & McEwan, M. J. Ion chemistry and N-containing molecules in Titan's upper atmosphere. Icarus 191, 722-742 (2007). Yelle, R. V. et al. Formation of NH3 and CH2NH in Titan's upper atmosphere. Faraday Discussions 147, 31-49 (2010). He, C. & Smith, M. A. A comprehensive NMR structural study of Titan aerosol analogs: Implications for Titan's atmospheric chemistry. Icarus 243, 31-38 (2014). Rannou, P. et al. Titan haze distribution and optical properties retrieved from recent observations. Icarus 208, 850-867 (2010). 9 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Acknowledgments: We are grateful to the general SOLEIL staff for running the facility and providing beamtime under project number 20120579. J.F. Gil is acknowledged for his technical support and the development and design of the sample holder. N. Carrasco and L. Gavilan thank the European Research Council for funding via the ERC PrimChem project (grant agreement No. 636829). We are grateful to B. Fleury for the preliminary IR spectroscopic measurements, as well as P. Pernot helpful discussions. We thank M. Béchard for his help and commitment during his short visit in the team. S. Tigrine acknowledges the University of Paris-Saclay for her thesis funding. MSG's work at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology was done under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and funded through NASA- SSW grant "Photochemical Processes in Titan's Atmosphere". L. Nahon acknowledges the support of the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-07-BLAN-0293). Contribution of the authors: NC supervised the study, participated to the irradiation experiments, treated the infrared spectroscopic data and drafted the article. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. LG characterized the sample thickness by ellipsometric measurements. ST participated to the irradiation experience. LN conceived the irradiation set-up, prepared the beamline for the irradiation conditions, and took part in the irradiation experiment. MG was involved in the analysis of the data, its interpretation, reaction mechanisms, and applications to Titan's atmosphere. 10 Figures Fig. 1: Sketch of the experiment where the synchrotron VUV beam irradiates Titan's aerosol analogs synthesized as thin organic films of 440 ± 20 nm thickness deposited on Si substrates. Each experiment corresponds to the irradiation of a specific sample at a chosen wavelength and for a given duration. The 11 mm² surface dimension of the films was chosen to ensure a flux density of about 1016 ph/sec/cm2 along with a homogenous irradiation of the sample by the synchrotron beam at the position of the sample holder, without irradiating the adjacent samples. 11 Fig. 2 : Infrared absorption spectra normalized to the highest absorption value at ~1550 cm-1. The grey envelope shows the dispersion (twice the standard deviation) among the twenty non-irradiated samples in the 1200-3500 cm-1 range. The red spectrum was recorded after irradiation for 24h by VUV photons at 121.6 nm on a single sample. 12 Fig. 3: (Above) Irradiation experiments at Lyman-α. Relative decrease with respect to the original intensity of several infrared band maximum intensities versus irradiation-time. Hatched boxes indicate the dispersion for non-irradiated samples. Error bars on the data points correspond to twice the standard deviation. Relative decrease becomes significant when larger than the dispersion of the non-irradiated samples. (Below) Decrease of the nitrile intensity at 2182 cm-1 under irradiation at 95 and 121.6 nm versus irradiation-time. Hatched boxes indicate the dispersion for non-irradiated samples. Error bars on the data points correspond to twice the standard deviation. Relative decrease becomes significant when larger than the dispersion of the non-irradiated samples. 13 Fig. 4: Deconvolution into four Gaussian components of the 2050-2300 cm-1 region (above) before irradiation, (below) after 24 hours of irradiation at Lyman-α. The black line corresponds to the raw spectrum, the red one to the result from the fitting procedure, the green lines to the four Gaussian components, and in dotted black line the residual. 14 Fig. 5: Zoom on the aliphatic carbon band after subtraction of the amine contribution: (Black) before irradiation, (Red) after 24 hrs of irradiation at Lyman-α. (Green) Data from the Cassini Visible and Imaging Mapping spectrometer (VIMS 24) of Titan's atmosphere at altitude ~ 200 km. 15 Integrated areas (arbitrary units) Gaussian component Shift (cm-1) Ar-NC @2110 cm-1 R-NC @2140 cm-1 C=C-CN @2180 cm-1 R-CN @2240 cm-1 -1.7 -4,7 -1,2 +3,9 Non-irradiated 0.55±0.03 3.00±0.15 Irradiated 0.65±0.03 3.42±0.17 14.84±0.74 10.84±0.54 2.27±0.11 2.16±0.11 Evolution +0.1±0.1 +0.4±0.3 -4.0±1.3 -0.1±0.2 Table 1: Effect of the Lyman-alpha irradiation on the integrated areas of the various vibrational structures of the nitrile bands (see deconvolution in Figure 4). Uncertainties on integrated areas of the non-irradiated and irradiated samples correspond to the 5% spectral variability determined in this wavelength range. 16 Methods: Titan's aerosol analogues Titan's haze analogs are produced by plasma deposition as thin films onto Silicon windows with a surface of 11 mm² and a thickness of 0.5 mm. In the thermosphere the methane density profile varies between 2 and 10% 1. Our synthesis has therefore been done by subjecting a 95-5% N2- CH4 gas mixture, representative of Titan's average atmospheric composition in the thermosphere to a radio-frequency electric discharge 2. The organic film production results from the chemistry induced by electron impact in a N2-CH4 gas mixture using a low pressure of 0.9 mbar radiofrequency capacitively coupled plasma discharge at room temperature 3,4. The plasma discharge generates electrons that ionize and dissociate CH4 and N2 similarly to the magnetospheric charged particles from Saturn 5 and the VUV photons reaching the atmosphere of Titan 2. The radicals and ions thus produced react allowing for an efficient macromolecular growth that leads to the production of an organic condensate, which is the laboratory analog of Titan's atmospheric (or thermosphere) aerosols. These analogs produced with a cold-plasma technique are the one simulating best the limited results obtained by the ACP instrument on ESA-Huygens when analyzing the refractory nucleus of the aerosols close to Titan surface 6,7. This result suggests the importance of reproducing in the laboratory analogs the nitrogen content detected in Titan's aerosols. Previous analysis by UV/VUV spectroscopies 8,9 and solid NMR 10 characterized the chemical structure of our analogs. Those are mainly based on C-N unsaturated bonded units, of which triazine (C3N3) is an important present component. The samples are considered as analogs of Titan's atmospheric aerosols in terms of replication of the energy source and gas phase composition, but were produced with a higher pressure and temperature than on Titan. The general relevance of laboratory simulations is described in detail in a review paper by Cable et al. 5. The samples are slightly contaminated by oxygen (~2% of the total elementary composition 11), in spite of the strict cleaning protocol described in 4 and based on baking under vacuum followed by a pure N2 plasma cleaning. This contamination occurs on the surface of the sample when exposed to ambient air 12. However this contamination is not an issue here, as the samples infrared spectra treated here are not modified by the small oxygen content, considering the intense signatures of the C-C and C-N bands in the samples. Another source of contamination could be considered during the irradiation process in the vacuum chamber. Radicals and ions released from a sample during its irradiation could interact at the surface of the non-irradiated samples adjacent on the sample holder. No significant thickness evolution is observed after irradiation, showing a negligible quantitative loss or addition of solid material after irradiation. If occurring, a superficial nanometer-scale contamination would not be detected by the infrared transmission spectroscopy diagnosis and is neglected in the present study. A film thickness of 440 ± 20 nm is found by spectroscopic ellipsometry in the 370–1000 nm spectral range (M-2000V ellipsometer, J.A. Woollam Co) 13. We verify that the films are similar in size and composition prior the irradiation experiment by comparing their IR signatures. We also make sure that they are homogeneous by recording the IR signatures on different 400 µm ×400 µm spots of the same sample. 17 VUV irradiation of the samples Considering a solar irradiance reference spectra at 1 A.U. 14, attenuated by 0.011 due to the distance from the Sun, the total VUV-UV solar flux density reaching Titan is about 1014 photons cm-2 s-1, and the photon flux density at Lyman-α is 3×109 photons cm-2 s-1. The irradiation duration of the aerosols in the thermosphere corresponds to the fraction of time spent by the aerosols between 1000 and 600 km during which the aerosols are irradiated by the sun. Microphysical models predict that the residence time of the aerosols in Titan thermosphere is about 11 days (106 s), between their formation at 1000 km and their aggregation in fractal dimensions triggered at 600 km 15. As a Titan-day lasts about 16 days (1.4 x 106 s), the aerosols are irradiated most of the time during their sedimentation in Titan thermosphere. Considering Titan's rotation and the variation of insolation over Titan's disk, the irradiation time over one day on Titan has to be divided by about a factor of four. During their descent in Titan thermosphere corresponding to about one Titan-day, aerosols receive therefore a total VUV irradiation dose of about 3.5×1019 photons cm-2. In our experiments, the 11 mm² sample surface is entirely illuminated by the beam spot of the quasi-monochromatic DESIRS-synchrotron beamline 16. The samples are positioned vertically on a sample holder at 107 cm from the DESIRS beamline focal point. A high precision manipulator enables to translate from one sample to another. Each sample on the sample holder is irradiated with a specific wavelength (95 or 121.6 nm) and a chosen irradiation-duration. The samples are submitted to the irradiation of the DESIRS monochromator at SOLEIL synchrotron. A gas filter, filled with xenon or argon according to the irradiation wavelength, eliminates the high harmonics of the undulator 17. In order to maximize the irradiation dose, the grating mirror is settled at the 0th order position, where it behaves as a mirror. At a given energy E, the pseudo- Gaussian spectral band of the undulator is transmitted with a spectral resolution ΔE/E = 7% at half maximum height. With this configuration, the photon flux density is two orders of magnitude larger than the corresponding UV solar flux density. The photon flux density remains low enough to ensure single-photon interactions with the material. The dose is adjusted by choosing shorter irradiation times of typically a few hours in our experiments. For example during a 24h synchrotron experiment, samples are exposed to a total irradiation dose of 8.6×1020 photons cm-2, comparable to the total VUV irradiation dose received by the thermospheric aerosols during one Titan-day. The total allocated synchrotron time (4 days) has been distributed in order to measure time-dependent evolutions of the samples under irradiation at both wavelengths. Three samples were irradiated at Lyman-α during 3, 10 and 24h respectively, whereas four samples were irradiated at 95 nm during 30 min, 1, 3 and 24h respectively. Infrared absorption spectroscopy The evolution of the infrared signatures of the samples was characterized by ex-situ mid-IR absorption spectroscopy in the 1200-3500 cm-1 wavenumber range. Initial spectra preceding the irradiation experiments were taken for each organic thin film. All pre- and post-irradiation infrared measurements were performed with the Thermo Scientific Nicolet iN10 MX spectrometer at the SMIS beamline of the synchrotron SOLEIL facility. We used a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector for a transmission analysis and spectral resolution of 4 cm-1. 18 Data availability The data that support the plots within the paper and other findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Additional references 1 Waite Jr, J. H. et al. Ion Neutral Mass Spectrometer Results from the First Flyby of Titan. Science 308, 982-986 (2005). Szopa, C., Cernogora, G., Boufendi, L., Correia, J.-J. & Coll, P. PAMPRE: A dusty plasma experiment for Titan's tholins production and study. Planet. Space Sci. 54, 394-404 (2006). Gautier, T. et al. Mid- and far-infrared absorption spectroscopy of Titan's aerosols analogues. Icarus 221, 320-327 (2012). Sciamma-O'Brien, E., Carrasco, N., Szopa, C., Buch, A. & Cernogora, G. Titan's atmosphere: An optimal gas mixture for aerosol production? Icarus 209, 704-714 (2010). Cable, M. L. et al. Titan Tholins: Simulating Titan Organic Chemistry in the Cassini-Huygens Era. Chem. Rev. 112, 1882-1909 (2012). Coll, P. et al. Can laboratory tholins mimic the chemistry producing Titan's aerosols? A review in light of ACP experimental results. Planetary and Space Science 77, 91–103 (2013). Israel, G. et al. Complex organic matter in Titan's atmospheric aerosols from in situ pyrolysis and analysis. Nature 438, 796-799 (2005). Quirico, E. et al. New experimental constraints on the composition and structure of tholins. Icarus 198, 218-231 (2008). Cunha de Miranda, B. et al. Molecular Isomer Identification of Titan's Tholins Organic Aerosols by Photoelectron/Photoion Coincidence Spectroscopy Coupled to VUV Synchrotron Radiation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 120, 6529-6540 (2016). Derenne, S. et al. New insights into the structure and chemistry of Titan's tholins via 13C and 15N solid state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Icarus 221 844–853 (2012). Fleury, B. et al. Influence of CO on Titan atmospheric reactivity. Icarus 238, 221-229 (2014). Carrasco, N., Jomard, F., Vigneron, J., Etcheberry, A. & Cernogora, G. Laboratory analogues simulating Titan's atmospheric aerosols: Compared chemical compositions of grains and thin films. Planetary and Space Science 128, 52-57 (2016). Mahjoub, A. et al. Influence of methane concentration on the optical indices of Titan's aerosols analogues. Icarus 221, 670-677 (2012). Thuillier, G. et al. Solar irradiance reference spectra for two solar active levels. Advances in Space Research 34, 256-261 (2004). Lavvas, P., Sander, M., Kraft, M. & Imanaka, H. Surface Chemistry and Particle Shape: Processes for the Evolution of Aerosols in Titan's Atmosphere. The Astrophysical Journal 728, 80 (2011). Nahon, L. et al. DESIRS: a state-of-the-art VUV beamline featuring high resolution and variable polarization for spectroscopy and dichroism at SOLEIL. J. Synchrotron Rad. 19, 508-520 (2012). Mercier, B. et al. Experimental and theoretical study of a differentially pumped absorption gas cell used as a low energy-pass filter in the vacuum ultraviolet photon energy range. J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 18, 2533-2541 (2000). 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19
1803.06069	1	1803	2018-03-16T03:41:30	A Preliminary Analysis of the Shangri-La Bolide on 2017 Oct 4	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	At 12:07 UT (8:07 pm China Standard Time) on 2017 Oct 4, a bright bolide was widely observed in the Shangri-La region in the Province of Yunnan, China (Figure 1). The event was well observed by the general public as it took place on the night of the Mid Autumn Festival which associates with moon gazing. Sonic booms and ground shaking were reported in an area about a thousand square kilometers wide to the northwest of the Shangri-La City. Data from the U.S. government sensor suggested that the impact energy of the event is approximately 0.54 kt TNT equivalent, with the terminus of the bolide positioned at $28.1^\circ$ N, $99.4^\circ$ E. This is the largest observed bolide event overland since the bolide event took place in Mauritania on 2016 Jun 27 (1.2 kt). In this Research Note we present a preliminary analysis of this event.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version March 19, 2018 Typeset using LATEX RNAAS style in AASTeX62 8 1 0 2 r a M 6 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 9 6 0 6 0 . 3 0 8 1 : v i X r a A Preliminary Analysis of the Shangri-La Bolide on 2017 Oct 4 Quan-Zhi Ye (叶泉志)1, 2 1Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, U.S.A. 2Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, U.S.A. (Received –; Revised –; Accepted –) Keywords: meteorites, meteors, meteoroids At 12:07 UT (8:07 pm China Standard Time) on 2017 Oct 4, a bright bolide was widely observed in the Shangri-La region in the Province of Yunnan, China (Figure 1). The event was well observed by the general public as it took place on the night of the Mid Autumn Festival which associates with moon gazing. Sonic booms and ground shaking were reported in an area about a thousand square kilometers wide to the northwest of the Shangri-La City. Data from the U.S. government sensor suggested that the impact energy of the event is approximately 0.54 kt TNT equivalent, with the terminus of the bolide positioned at 28.1◦ N, 99.4◦ E. This is the largest observed bolide event overland since the bolide event took place in Mauritania on 2016 Jun 27 (1.2 kt). International Meteor Organization and American Meteor Society operates fireball report programs that col- lect world-wide observations of fireballs and bolides (https://www.imo.net/observations/fireballs/fireballs/ and https://www.amsmeteors.org/fireballs/, see Hankey et al. 2014; Hankey & Perlerin 2015). However, very few (2) reports of the Shangri-La event have been archived in either database. Here we collect various of accounts from Weibo users, forum posts, and media reports, tabulated in Table 1. Table 1. Compilation of the visual and video accounts of the Shangri-La bolide. Some accounts are extracted from the post by Liu Wenjieb. Site Coordinate Concurrent Delayed Shaking? Source Note boom? boom? Balagezong National Park (巴拉格宗国家公园) Baoshan City (保山) Benzilan (奔子栏) Dali City (大理) .. Hongpo Village (红坡村) Lijiang City (丽江) Niding Village (尼丁村) Nixi Township (尼西县城) Nujiang City (怒江) Ramwok, Tibet (然乌) Shusong Village (书松村) Tangman Village (汤满村) Xiaruo Township (霞若乡) Xingfu Village (幸福村) Shangri-La City (Zhongdian/中甸) 28.285◦ N, 99.432◦ E 25.1◦ N, 99.2◦ E 28.24◦ N, 99.30◦ E 25.6◦ N, 100.3◦ E 25.535◦ N, 100.330◦ E 27.81◦ N, 99.81◦ E 25.964◦ N, 100.157◦ E 28.19◦ N, 99.24◦ E 28.1◦ N, 99.5◦ E 25.8◦ N, 98.9◦ E 29.317◦ N, 96.990◦ E 28.27◦ N, 99.19◦ E 28.02◦ N, 99.49◦ E 27.80◦ N, 99.30◦ E 28.14◦ N, 99.43◦ E 27.8◦ N, 99.7◦ E X X X X X X X X X X X X Media report "Passing overhead and heading E, red" X X Witness report "Sonic boom and shaking like a landslide is taking place" Media report Multiple accounts X X X X X X X X X X X X Media report Multiple accounts Dashcam G56 freeway facing NW Media report Dashcam Liu's post G5611 freeway facing NW House shaking, like a gas explosion Media report "Pigs run out of barn" Media report Multiple accounts S201 highway facing E Dashcam Liu's post Media report Liu's post Liu's post Witness report ahttp://bbs.tianya.cn/post-travel-821029-1.shtml, in Chinese. Retrieved 2017 Dec 19. bhttp://bbs.tianya.cn/post-travel-821029-1.shtml, in Chinese. Retrieved 2017 Dec 19. Figure 2 shows that moderate ground shaking was limited to an area about 30 × 30 km2 around Hongpo Village, ∼ 40 km northwest of the Shangri-La City (labeled as Deqen/迪庆藏族自治州in the figure). Curiously, reports from Corresponding author: Quan-Zhi Ye [email protected] 2 Ye Figure 1. Location of the Shangri-La bolide. Hongpo Village did not indicate ground shaking. It is not clear whether this was the case or the information was simply omitted. According to the local government agency, no significant property damage or loss has so far been reported1. We also collected 3 dashboard camera footages that the shooting locations are precisely known: two from freeways near the cities of Lijiang and Dali in Yunnan, approximately 100 and 300 km to the south, one from Rawu, Tibet, ∼300 km to the northwest (Figure 3). Initial analysis shows that the trajectory and motion of the bolide broadly agree the U.S. government sensor data. The Rawu footage included the full moon in the field of view, which appeared to be much less bright than the bolide at its peak brightness (Figure 3, frame b). The event was also detected seismically and infrasonically. China Earthquake Agency has reported positive detection by two seismic stations, Zhongdian (27.824◦ N, 99.707◦ E) and Gongshan (27.740◦ N, 98.665◦ E), registered at a Richter scale of 2.12. The CTBTO Kunming station and an infrasound array deployed in western Yunnan also detected the event (W. Su, private communication). Both datasets are not yet publicly available. After the termination of ablation, meteorites decelerate to a speed of a few km/s and will typically spend a few minutes airborne before reaching the ground (Ceplecha et al. 1998). Atmospheric sounding data obtained by the nearby Xichang Station in Sichuan, ∼250 km to the east3, revealed that the local atmosphere was dominated by westerly wind, largely parallel to the travel direction of the bolide. Therefore, we expect that any surviving meteorites would show little transverse motion. We estimate that the possible strewn field to be ∼ 100 km northeast of the bolide terminus near the Yunnan–Sichuan border (Figure 4). This is in line with independent calculation carried out by R. Matson (R. Matson, private communication). 1 http://news.chinaxiaokang.com/dujiazhuangao/2017/1006/260312.html, in Chinese. Retrieved 2017 Dec 19. 2 http://news.xinhuanet.com/tech/2017-10/06/c 1121765328.htm, in Chinese. Retrieved 2017 Dec 19. 3 Available from an archive maintained by the Department of Atmospheric Science at the University of Wyoming, http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html, retrieved 2018 Jan. 4. A Preliminary Analysis of the Shangri-La Bolide on 2017 Oct 4 3 Figure 2. Bolide witness and ground shaking reports in the Shangri-La area. Shangri-La City is labeled as Deqen/迪庆藏族自治州in the figure. Also marked is the fireball detection reported by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) sensor. We also attempted to use the Doppler weather radar data to look for micrometeorites deposits in the atmosphere. However, the predicted region is not covered by the Chinese weather radar network; the closest Doppler radar at Lijiang is about 200 km to the south with an effective observing range of 150 km. It was reported that "several hundreds of" meteorite hunters had arrived on the scene to search for meteorites4. Many chose to search in the northwest of Shangri-La City where most of the shock wave reports surfaced. Both this region and our estimated strewn field is very mountainous, but the latter is more so and is sparsely populated. At the time of this writing, the searches are ceased5 and there is no credible successful recovery of the Shangri-La meteorite. Unlike the U.S. and Europe, China is yet to establish a dedicated government-level body that oversees the research of near-Earth objects. Bolides that are energetic enough to be recorded by the U.S. government sensor occur in the country about once per year, with the last ones being the 2014 Xilin Gol event and the 2015 Gansu event. The Xilin Gol event, took place in the early morning of 2014 Nov 5 over the Gobi desert ∼ 300 km north of Beijing, was of similar magnitude to the Shangri-La event and had also caught considerable public attention. It was believed that multi-kilogram meteorites from the Xilin Gol event had reached the ground. Efforts (mostly led by amateurs) were launched to recover these meteorites but no successful recovery has been reported so far. In a global scale, meteorite-dropping events are quite frequent. Using the event rate derived by Halliday et al. (1984) we estimate that event with > 1 kg meteorite fall occurs once per week on average over the entire Chinese territory. Amateur astronomers in several parts of China have recently begun to build video camera networks, in the hope to better constrain the trajectory of the next meteorite-dropping events. As of early 2018, camera networks in Beijing, Shandong, Guangdong, northern Xinjiang and northwestern Tibet are operational (Ye 2018). 4 http://news.sina.com.cn/o/2017-10-10/doc-ifymrcmm9945166.shtml, in Chinese. Retrieved 2018 Jan 3. 5 http://news.sina.com.cn/s/wh/2017-10-22/doc-ifymyyxw4058501.shtml, in Chinese. Retrieved 2018 Jan 3. 4 Ye Figure 3. Footage of the dashboard camera provided by Tan Kaixin, who was then traveling on an eastbound vehicle on Highway S201 near Rawu, Tibet. The clock of the camera was not calibrated and the timings on the lower-right corner are likely inaccurate. I thank Peter Brown and Rob Matson for helpful discussions, as well as all the witnesses for sharing their videos and accounts on the internet. The author is supported by the GROWTH project (National Science Foundation Grant No. 1545949). A Preliminary Analysis of the Shangri-La Bolide on 2017 Oct 4 5 Figure 4. Estimated strewn field of the Shangri-La meteorites. REFERENCES Ceplecha, Z., Borovicka, J., Elford, W. G., et al. 1998, Hankey, M., & Perlerin, V. 2015, in International Meteor SSRv, 84, 327, doi: 10.1023/A:1005069928850 Halliday, I., Blackwell, A. T., & Griffin, A. A. 1984, Science, 223, 1405, doi: 10.1126/science.223.4643.1405 Conference Mistelbach, Austria, ed. J.-L. Rault & P. Roggemans, 192–196 Hankey, M., Perlerin, V., Lunsford, R., & Meisel, D. 2014, in Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, Poznan, Poland, 22-25 August 2013, ed. M. Gyssens, P. Roggemans, & P. Zoladek, 115–119 Ye, Q.-Z. 2018, Astronomical Research & Technology. https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00139
1702.08618	1	1702	2017-02-28T03:05:41	A Volcanic Hydrogen Habitable Zone	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The classical habitable zone is the circular region around a star in which liquid water could exist on the surface of a rocky planet. The outer edge of the traditional N2-CO2-H2O habitable zone (HZ) extends out to nearly 1.7 AU in our Solar System, beyond which condensation and scattering by CO2 outstrips its greenhouse capacity. Here, we show that volcanic outgassing of atmospheric H2 on a planet near the outer edge can extend the habitable zone out to ~2.4 AU in our solar system. This wider volcanic hydrogen habitable zone (N2-CO2-H2O-H2) can be sustained as long as volcanic H2 output offsets its escape from the top of the atmosphere. We use a single-column radiative-convective climate model to compute the HZ limits of this volcanic hydrogen habitable zone for hydrogen concentrations between 1% and 50%, assuming diffusion-limited atmospheric escape. At a hydrogen concentration of 50%, the effective stellar flux required to support the outer edge decreases by ~35% to 60% for M to A stars. The corresponding orbital distances increase by ~30% to 60%. The inner edge of this HZ only moves out by ~0.1 to 4% relative to the classical HZ because H2 warming is reduced in dense H2O atmospheres. The atmospheric scale heights of such volcanic H2 atmospheres near the outer edge of the HZ also increase, facilitating remote detection of atmospheric signatures.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Accepted in The Astrophysical Journal Letters A VOLCANIC HYDROGEN HABITABLE ZONE Ramses M. Ramirez1,2, and Lisa Kaltenegger1,3 1Carl Sagan Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 2Cornell Center of Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 3Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Corresponding author - Ramses Ramirez email: [email protected], phone 480-296-6477 ABSTRACT The classical habitable zone is the circular region around a star in which liquid water could exist on the surface of a rocky planet. The outer edge of the traditional N2-CO2-H2O habitable zone (HZ) extends out to nearly ~1.7 AU in our Solar System, beyond which condensation and scattering by CO2 outstrips its greenhouse capacity. Here, we show that volcanic outgassing of atmospheric H2 on a planet near the outer edge can extend the habitable zone out to ~2.4 AU in our solar system. This wider volcanic hydrogen habitable zone (N2-CO2-H2O-H2) can be sustained as long as volcanic H2 output offsets its escape from the top of the atmosphere. We use a single- column radiative-convective climate model to compute the HZ limits of this volcanic hydrogen habitable zone for hydrogen concentrations between 1% and 50%, assuming diffusion-limited atmospheric escape. At a hydrogen concentration of 50%, the effective stellar flux required to support the outer edge decreases by ~35% to 60% for M - A stars. The corresponding orbital distances increase by ~30% to 60%. The inner edge of this HZ only moves out ~0.1 to 4% relative to the classical HZ because H2 warming is reduced in dense H2O atmospheres. The atmospheric scale heights of such volcanic H2 atmospheres near the outer edge of the HZ also increase, facilitating remote detection of atmospheric signatures. Key words: planets - habitable zones - atmospheres - hydrogen - carbon dioxide -volcanism 1 1. INTRODUCTION The habitable zone (HZ) is the circular region around a star(s) in which liquid water could be stable on a rocky planet's surface (e.g. Kasting et al., 1993, Kaltenegger & Haghighipour 2013, Haghighipour & Kaltenegger 2013) and possible atmospheric biosignatures may be detected (e.g. Kaltenegger et al. 2010). The classical N2- CO2-H2O HZ is defined by the greenhouse effect of CO2 and H2O vapor. The outer edge, the CO2 maximum greenhouse limit, is defined as the distance beyond which condensation and scattering by CO2 outstrips its greenhouse capacity. The inner edge is defined where mean surface temperatures exceed the critical point of water (~647 K, 220 bar), triggering a runaway greenhouse that leads to rapid water loss to space on very short timescales (see Kasting et al. 1993 for details). Additional greenhouse gases could further extend the HZ. It had been suggested that young orphan planets unbound to their host stars could accrete massive primordial hydrogen envelopes (Stevenson 1999). Models show that a super-Earth with a 40 bar primordial hydrogen atmosphere could maintain surface temperatures out to 10 AU from a solar-type G-star (Pierrehumbert and Gaidos 2011). The potency of this greenhouse effect arises from collision-induced absorption (CIA) caused by self-broadening from H2-H2 collisions, allowing H2 to function noncondensibly out to great distances (Pierrehumbert and Gaidos, 2011). For comparison, condensation and scattering effects at high CO2 partial pressures limit the outer edge of the classical HZ in our solar system to ~1.7 AU (e.g. Kasting et al., 1993). above-freezing mean However, maintaining large amounts of primordial hydrogen over geological timescales is difficult (Pierrehumbert and Gaidos, 2011). Hydrogen is a very light greenhouse gas, and without a continuous source, hydrodynamic escape to space would strip a 5 Earth-mass habitable zone rocky planet with 50 bars of primordial atmospheric H2 within just a few million years. Primordial hydrogen lifetimes in atmospheric models only extend to ~100 million years at H2 partial pressures of several hundred bar (Wordsworth, 2012). partial pressures Another way to generate atmospheric hydrogen on terrestrial planets is through volcanism. Paleoclimate studies of early Earth and Mars show that volcanism could have outpaced escape of H2 on both planets, maintaining clement conditions with modest H2 bar (Wordsworth and Pierrehumbert, 2013; Ramirez et al., 2014). Reduced mantle conditions could have favored enhanced outgassing of H2 over longer timescales. In these models hydrogen is not the major atmospheric constituent and is continuously replenished by volcanism that offsets losses to space. these volcanic hydrogen atmospheres, it is foreign-broadening by the remaining background atmosphere that excites roto-translational bands within the hydrogen, increasing greenhouse warming in spectral regions where CO2 and H2O absorb poorly (Ramirez et al. 2014). below 1 In In this work, we assess the impact that foreign broadening of volcanic hydrogen in a planet's atmosphere has on the classical N2- CO2-H2O habitable zone (Kasting et al., 1993; Kopparapu et al., 2013). We derive the limits of this volcanic-hydrogen HZ (N2- CO2-H2O-H2) for host stars with Teff ranging from 2,600K to 10,000 K. 2 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Climate modeling procedures 2014; Ramirez 10,000K (Ramirez As in previous studies of the HZ (e.g. Kopparapu et al., 2013; Ramirez and Kaltenegger, and Kaltenegger, 2016) we used a 1-D radiative- convective climate model to compute habitable zone boundaries for stars of stellar effective temperatures (Teff) ranging from 2,600K and Kaltenegger, 2016). The model uses correlated-k coefficients to parameterize absorption by H2O and CO2 across 38 solar intervals and 55 infrared intervals (e.g. Kopparapu et al. 2013 for details). We model CO2-H2 collision-induced absorption (CIA) using initio calculations (Wordsworth et al., 2017), CO2- CO2 CIA using established parameterizations (Gruszka and Borysow, 1997; Gruszka and Borysow, 1998; Baranov et al., 2004), self- broadening of H2-H2 pairs (Borysow, 2002) and N2 foreign-broadening (see Ramirez et al. 2014 for details). computed to recently ab it flux required the mean calculations, to maintain We use inverse calculations, where the surface temperature is specified and the solar is calculated, to determine the limits of the HZ (following e.g., Kasting et al., 1993; Kopparapu et al., 2013). For the outer edge HZ surface temperature is fixed at 273 K, above which liquid water is stable on a planetary surface. Stratospheric temperatures are fixed at 154 K, which is representative for a planet near the outer edge of the habitable zone (e.g. Kopparapu et al. 2013). For the inner edge, the stratospheric temperature is 200 K and the surface temperature is gradually increased from a starting temperature of 200 K, which simulates pushing the planet closer and closer to the star until a runaway greenhouse is triggered (e.g. Kasting et al., 1993). 3 conditions The input of hydrogen from volcanic sources in our models is balanced by its escape to space. Actual hydrogen escape rates will be planet-specific, therefore we assume that hydrogen escapes at the diffusion limit, which is the fastest that H can escape at the concentrations considered (e.g Walker, 1977). Thus, our results may overestimate hydrogen escape and thus provide a lower bound on H concentrations. As with previous HZ studies, we assume planets support plate tectonics, including a carbonate-silicate cycle capable of maintaining habitability over long timescales (e.g. Kasting et al., 1993, Ramirez & Kaltenegger 2016). We also assume on highly-reduced mantle terrestrial planets, as from meteoritic evidence from early Mars (e.g. Grott et al., 2011). Hydrogen sources and sinks need to balance to support a continuous hydrogen concentration. Our model planet has the same outgassing rates per unit area as those on our present day planet based on the inference that the heat flux of early Mars could have been similar to that of modern Earth (Montési and Zuber, 2003; Ramirez et al., 2014). This allows us to constrain typical H2 concentrations for reducing mantles of outer edge planets to ~ 1 – 30% (Ramirez et al., 2014; Batalha et al., 2015). For comparison we extreme concentration of 50% (assuming even higher outgassing rates or less efficient hydrogen escape) intended to simulate potentially higher outgassing rates (e.g. on hypothetical planets with unusually high geothermal fluxes). include one suggested Each of our model atmospheres contains 1 bar of N2 and H2 concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50%, respectively, of the dry (N2+CO2+H2) atmosphere. Oxygen has only a weak greenhouse effect and is replaced by N2 these calculations (following Kasting et al. 1993). For the outer edge calculations we vary the CO2 partial pressure in from 1x10-2 to 34.7 bar, the saturation CO2 partial pressure at 273K. CH4 is not expected to build up to appreciable concentrations in CO2-H2 atmospheres because of its short photochemical lifetime when H2 is not the major constituent (Bains et al. 2014). Recent work shows that CH4 would likely oxidize to CO2 in warm CO2-H2 atmospheres (Batalha et al., 2015). At the inner edge, our volcanic-H2 atmospheres contain 1 bar of N2 and 330 ppm CO2 (following Kasting et al., 1993). As in the case of the outer edge, we model H2 concentrations that are 1, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 50% of the dry (N2+CO2+H2) atmosphere. We gradually increase planetary surface temperatures from 200K to the critical point of water (647.1K, 220.6 bars H2O), which leads to the runaway greenhouse and rapid evaporation of the surface water inventory (e.g., Kasting et al., 1993). The high atmospheric H2O mole fraction at the inner edge reduces the warming effect of H2. Note that the H2 amount is scaled to the dry atmosphere because volcanism is not expected to increase as H2O vapor mixing ratios increase. In keeping with previous work (see e.g. Kopparapu et al. 2013) all model atmospheres are fully-saturated: A moist CO2 adiabat is followed in the upper atmosphere for the outer edge calculations. A moist H2O adiabat is followed in the upper atmosphere for the inner edge model calculations. We also employ six solar zenith angles and a surface albedo of 0.31 to mimic the combined clouds and reflection, which reproduces the mean surface temperature for present Earth (ibid). Because there is no self- consistent cloud model for 1D HZ studies (see Zsoms et al. 2012), surface and cloud albedo are held constant for all simulations (following previous 1-D HZ studies, see e.g. Kasting et al., 1993; Kopparapu et al., 2013), even though cloud feedback is expected to surface 4 for atmospheric compositions change different from those of present-day Earth. However, our understanding of clouds is still evolving and their applicability to water-rich atmospheres (i.e. inner edge of the HZ) is not fully understood yet. Note that overall planetary albedo changes as the atmospheric composition is varied. 3. RESULTS Adding volcanic hydrogen moves both the inner and the outer edges of the classical HZ outward and widens it. The incident stellar fluxes (Seff) corresponding to the outer edges of the classical and new volcanic-H2 HZ, are shown in fig.1. For comparison, an alternative HZ limit that is not based on atmospheric models (i.e. classical HZ), but on empirical observations of our solar system, is also shown in figs. 1-2. The inner edge of this empirical HZ is defined by the stellar flux received by Venus when we can exclude the possibility that it had standing water on the surface (about 1Gyr ago), equivalent to a stellar flux of Seff=1.77 (Kasting et al.1993). The outer edge is defined by the stellar flux that Mars received at the time that it may have had stable water on its surface (about 3.8 Gyr ago), which corresponds to Seff=0.32 (ibid). The incident flux in both figures is normalized to that received by Earth's orbit (~1360 W/m2), S0. The incident stellar flux that is needed to maintain liquid water surface temperatures at the outer edge of our solar system decreases from 0.3576 to 0.267 (25% decrease) and to 0.201 (44% decrease) with 5% and 30% H2, respectively (fig.1). This corresponds to increases in the orbital distance of the maximum greenhouse limit of CO2 at the outer edge HZ from 1.67 AU to 1.94 AU and 2.23 AU, respectively (16% and 34% increases, respectively; fig.2). With 50% H2 the limits extend farther, corresponding to an Seff of 0.172 (52% increase) and an outer edge distance of 2.4 AU (44% increase) in our own Solar System. Overall, the Seff required to support the outer edge decreases by a maximum of ~35 – 60% (at 50% H2) for M - A star types, resulting in respective distance increases of ~30 to 60% (fig. 2). Figure 1: Effective stellar temperature versus incident stellar flux (Seff) for the outer edge. The CO2 maximum greenhouse limit (dashed) is shown along with the empirical outer edge (solid black) and outer edge limits containing 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 50% H2 (red solid) 5 Figure 2: Effective stellar temperature versus (left) incident stellar flux (Seff) and (right) orbital distance for the classical (dashed), empirical (solid black), and volcanic hydrogen (solid red) habitable zone. The red curves contain 30% and 50% H2, respectively. As shown in Kopparapu et al. (2013), Earth appears near the classical inner edge because of the generic model assumption of 100% relative humidity. With subsaturation, Earth is well within the classical HZ (e.g., Leconte et al. 2013) The volcanic hydrogen HZ boundaries can be calculated using equation 1 with constants from Table 1 and Table 2: (1) where T* is equal to Teff – 5780K and Seff(sun) are the fluxes computed for our solar system (see Tables 1-2). The corresponding orbital distances of the HZ can be calculated using equation 2 (fig.2): (2) where L/Lsun is the stellar luminosity in solar units and d is the orbital distance in AU. Planetary mass that is linked to planetary model surface pressure via gravity and planetary radius have only a small effect on the HZ limits (Kopparapu et al. 2014). 6 Although the inner edge of the HZ is also affected by the addition of H2, the runaway greenhouse limit distance (e.g. Kasting et al., 1993) only moves outward by ~0.1% to 4% for 1% H2 and 50% H2 (fig. 2), respectively, because of the dense water vapor atmosphere at the inner edge. At temperatures above ~300 K water vapor absorption begins to mask hydrogen collision-induced absorption, decreasing its effectiveness. The greenhouse effect of CO2 increases with higher pCO2 to a maximum value (fig. 3), corresponding to the maximum greenhouse effect. However, as the hydrogen concentration increases, the CO2 partial pressures associated with the outer edge occur at larger orbital distances. This occurs because cooling from both CO2 condensation and scattering eventually outpace the combined greenhouse effect of CO2 and H2 farther from the host star. lower Seff and Seff=Seff(sun)+aT+bT2+cT3+dT4d=LLsunSeff Figure 3: Dependence of the incident stellar flux (Seff) on atmospheric CO2 partial pressure (pCO2) for the solar system outer edge. The pCO2 values corresponding to the maximum greenhouse for atmospheres with hydrogen (red curves) and without (dashed curve) are shown as vertical lines for 0% to 50% H2 (see text). to is added About 8 bars of CO2 are required to sustain surface temperatures above freezing at the CO2 maximum greenhouse limit of the classical HZ in our solar system (Kasting et al., 1993; Kopparapu et al., 2013). When hydrogen the planetary atmosphere, the CO2 partial pressure required at the outer edge of the volcanic-H2 HZ decreases to 6 bar with 1% H2, and to 1 bar at 30% H2 (fig. 3). The corresponding H2 partial pressures (with 1 bar N2) are 0.071 bar and 0.857 bar respectively. At 50% H2, the CO2 and H2 partial pressures at the outer edge of the volcanic-hydrogen HZ are 0.5 and 1.5 bars, respectively. The stellar energy distribution of host stars also determines what CO2 concentration 7 the maximum CO2 greenhouse effect is reached. For cooler stars, increased near- infrared absorption and reduced scattering lower this CO2 concentration (e.g. Kasting et al., 1993). For a cool M6 star (Teff ~ 3000 K), the CO2 partial pressure at the outer edge of the classical HZ is 15 bar. Adding H2 reduces the required amount of CO2 at the outer edge to 9 bar and 1 bar for 1% and 30% H2, respectively. The corresponding H2 partial pressures are 0.1 bar and 0.857 bar. Atmospheric scale height increases with the addition of hydrogen. For example, adding 30% H2 to the atmosphere of a habitable planet located in our solar system's outer edge (1 bar N2 and 8 bar CO2) increases its atmospheric scale height by over a factor a assuming of 1.5 due to the decreased atmospheric mean molecular mass, similar temperature structure. In addition, such H2- rich planets at the outer edge of the HZ also have less CO2 in their atmospheres, reducing the optical density as compared to those CO2 atmospheres that do not contain hydrogen. These the detection of atmospheric spectral features with the next generation of telescopes, making such planets very interesting targets for JWST and the E-ELTs in the search for life. two effects could facilitate 4. DISCUSSION in the mantles Although the present day mantle of Earth is relatively oxidized, it is generally assumed that terrestrial planets, including Earth, start reduced (i.e. oxygen- poor), which may lead to conditions that promote high levels of H2 outgassing. One of the main arguments for a reduced early mantle is that Earth (and possibly other terrestrial planets) must have entered a magma ocean stage during accretion, which would have acted as a surficial oxygen sink (e.g., Scaillet 2011). Afterwards, planetary mantles are thought to become oxidized over time, either gradually or in a stepwise fashion (Wood et al., 2006). Mantle oxidation on Earth may have occurred rather quickly, perhaps only ~100 million core-mantle differentiation (Trail et al., 2011). and Gaillard, years after Mantle oxidation may have taken longer on Mars though. High H2 outgassing on early Mars is inferred from Martian meteorites suggesting a highly reduced ancient Martian mantle (Stanley et al., 2011; Grott et al., 2011). If early Mars was kept warm by atmospheric H2 up until ~3.6 Ga, this would suggest reducing mantle conditions had persisted for ~1 billion years. Supporting this view, geochemical results from the ~4 billion 8 year old meteorites, ALH84001 and NWA Black Beauty, infer a reduced mantle for at least ~0.5 billion years (e.g. Grott et al., 2011). These solar system examples warrant some discussion of how mantle oxidation may generally proceed on planets. One idea suggests lower mantle pressures of larger terrestrial bodies (e.g. Earth) are sufficiently high to convert iron(II) oxide to iron metal and iron(III) oxide, oxidizing the mantle during accretion (Wade and Wood, 2005). According to this notion, smaller planets like Mars would not have generated internal pressures sufficiently high for mantle oxidation, in agreement with the meteorite evidence. This may suggest that atmospheric H2 may not easily build up on more massive planets. However, this may happen in a number of ways. First, these calculations assume that H2 escapes at the diffusion limit, but H2 concentrations can potentially build up if escape rates (including hydrodynamic and Jean's) are lower than this limit, as had been suggested for the early Earth (Tian et al. 2005). Hydrogen retention will also be favored on planets with stronger magnetic fields or on those with higher outgassing rates per unit area. Moreover, it is possible that H2- rich atmospheres may be longer-lived on super- Earths. First, their enhanced gravity results in reduced H2 escape rates, promoting hydrogen retention (e.g. Pierrehumbert and Gaidos, 2011). Secondly, mantle oxidation may be slowed as a result, increasing the lifetime of reduced mantle conditions. Larger planets may have higher outgassing rates, possibly leading to a feedback in which higher outgassing rates enhance weathering rates and vice versa (e.g. Heller 2015). Plus, interior heat is retained longer on super- Earths, ensuring that plate tectonics and volcanism both last (ibid). Hydrogen retention is also favored for outer edge planets. Hamano et al. (2013) suggest that selective hydrodynamic escape of H over O during accretion could lead to early mantle oxidation. However, outer edge planets would be less susceptible to this effect because corresponding EUV fluxes are much lower than in the inner solar system. Given that hydrodynamic escape rates are ∝ 1/(d(AU)2), and assuming energy-limited escape (e.g. Ramirez and Kaltenegger, 2014), H escape rates (all else equal) on a young accreting Earth-mass planet orbiting the early Sun at 1.7 AU would have been ~ a factor of ~3 – 6 lower than on early Earth or Venus. These loss rates would decrease further by 1/30 – 1/60 on a 10-Earth mass super-Earth. It is also possible that accreting planets incorporate more hydrogen because the protoplanetary disk itself is enriched in the element. In addition, because stellar fluxes are lower for these distant planets, magma ocean durations should decrease as well, further weakening escape (Hamano et al. 2013). All of these factors could more than offset the factor of ~15 – 40 relatively higher H2 outgassing rates inferred for a highly reduced mantle (Ramirez et al., 2014). Thus, sizeable hydrogen larger terrestrial planets located near the outer edge may be sustainable as long as mantle conditions support conditions that favor hydrogen retention over escape to space. inventories on Certain atmospheric spectral features, including N2O and NH3, which can, but do not have to be produced biotically, could be detected in H2-dominated atmospheres (Seager et al., 2013; Baines et al., 2014). Such volcanic-hydrogen atmospheres may also be able to evolve methane-based photosynthesis al., 2014). (Bains Distinguishing biosignatures from abiotic sources in such atmospheres will be challenging. NH3 can be formed abiotically through in reaction of N2 and H2 et 9 hydrothermal vents on planets with reducing mantles (Kasting et al., 2014). N2O can be formed a number of ways including through atmospheric shock from meteoritic fall-in, lightning, UV radiation (e.g. Ramirez, 2016) and through solar flare interactions with the magnetosphere (Airapetian et al., 2016). Thus, future biosignature studies should focus on modeling biotic and abiotic sources for these gases in thin volcanic-hydrogen atmospheres. Lastly, earlier studies suggesting that backscattering from CO2 clouds could move the outer edge beyond 2 AU (Mischna et al., 2000) is challenged by new work indicating that the greenhouse effect of CO2 clouds may be greatly overstated (Kitzmann et al., 2016; 2017). Even should warming from CO2 clouds be relatively ineffective, volcanically outgassed H2 in some stellar systems may compensate and keep the HZ similarly wide for geologically significant timescales. 5. CONCLUSION We have calculated the limits of the volcanic-H2 HZ for H2 concentrations ranging from 1% to 50%. We find that the addition of 30% H2 can extend the outer edge in our solar system to ~2.23 AU (2.4 AU with 50% H2). The orbital distance of the outer edge of the volcanic-hydrogen HZ moves outward by as much as ~60% as compared to the classical HZ for A to M type main sequence Stars. The inner edge only moves out by ~0.1% to 4%. Reduced mantle conditions that promote hydrogen outgassing on small terrestrial planets may be maintained long timescales (>0.5 Gyr). Atmospheric H2 may be retained on larger terrestrial planets, including through higher gravity and potentially stronger magnetic fields. H retention is also generally favored in super-Earths, for planets with higher outgassing rates, and if H2 escapes more slowly than the diffusion limit. Hydrodynamic escape rates are also lower for planets farther away from the host star, mitigating the selective escape of H over O. Generally, hydrogen-rich atmospheres composed of N2, CO2 and H2O can be maintained as long as volcanic outgassing of H2 outpaces its escape. Moreover, the addition of H2 increases the atmospheric scale height making super- Earths near the volcanic-H2 HZ outer edge interesting observational targets. Near-future missions like JWST and the ELTs could potentially detect atmospheric features, including biosignatures, on such planets. Table 1. Coefficients to calculate the outer edge of the volcanic hydrogen HZ Constant 1% H2 5% H2 10% H2 20% H2 30% H2 50% H2 Seff(Sun) 0.3129 0.2671 0.2452 0.2271 0.2009 0.1723 A B C D 4.6597x10-05 3.4301x10-5 2.9373x10-5 2.5976x10-5 1.7821x10-5 1.4029x10-05 3.7621x10-10 1.2999x10-10 2.3132x10-10 -1.0703x10-9 -6.9474x10-11 -3.2318x10-10 -9.332x10-13 -6.6514x10-13 -5.1625x10-13 -6.8630x10-13 -3.1860x10-13 -2.8689x10-13 9.4571x10-17 6.3759x10-17 4.9119x10-17 1.1099x10-16 3.3181x10-17 4.2926x10-17 Table 2. Coefficients to calculate the inner edge of the volcanic hydrogen HZ Constant 1% H2 5% H2 10% H2 20% H2 30% H2 50% H2 Seff(Sun) 0.9975 0.9946 0.9884 0.9775 0.9655 0.9377 a b c d 1.0708x10-4 1.0644x10-4 1.0613x10-4 1.0501x10-4 1.0383x10-4 1.0123x10-4 8.5594x10-9 7.4458x10-9 8.4633x10-9 8.3633x10-9 8.2456x10-9 7.9833x10-9 -2.3600x10-12 -2.4365x10-12 -2.3376x10-12 -2.3106x10-12 -2.2837x10-12 -2.2204x10-12 1.2683x10-16 2.0284x10-16 1.2619x10-16 1.2447x10-16 1.2364x10-16 1.2098x10-16 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Robin Wordsworth for kindly providing his CO2-H2 collision- induced absorption data. We also thank James F. Kasting for the helpful discussions. The authors acknowledge support by the Simons Foundation (SCOL # 290357, Kaltenegger) and the Carl Sagan Institute. REFERENCES Airapetian, V. S., Glocer, A., Gronoff, G., Hébrard, E., & Danchi, W. 2016, NatGe., 9, 452- 455 Bains, W., Seager, S., & Zsom, A. (2014). Life, 4(4), 716-744. Baranov, Y. I., Lafferty, W. J., & Fraser, G. T. 2004, Journal of molecular spectroscopy, 228,2, 432-440. Batalha, N., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Ramirez, R., & Kasting, J. F. 2015, Icarus, 258, 337-349. Borysow, A. 2002, A&A, 390, 2, 779-782. Grott, M., Morschhauser, A., Breuer, D., & Hauber, E. 2011, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 308, 3, 391-400. Gruszka, M., & Borysow, A. 1997, Icarus, 129, 1, 172-177. Gruszka, M. Borysow, A. Molecular physics 93.6 (1998): 1007-1016. Haghighipour N. & Kaltenegger, L, Habitability of Binary Systems II: P-type binaries, ApJ, 777, 2, 166, 13 pp., 2013 Hamano, K., Abe, Y., & Genda, H. 2013, Natur, 497, 7451, 607-610. Heller, René, 2015. Scientific American 312,1, 32-39. Kaltenegger, L. & Haghighipour N., Habitability of Binary Systems I: S-type binaries, ApJ, 777, 2, 165, 11 pp., 2013 Kaltenegger, L., Selsis, F., Fridlund, M. et al. (2010). AsBio, 10(1), 89-102 Kasting, J. F., Kopparapu, R., Ramirez, R. M., & Harman, C. E. 2014, PNAS, 111, 35, 12641- 12646. Kasting, J.F., Whitmire, D.P., Reynolds, R.T., 1993, Icarus 101 108-128 Kitzmann, D. 2016, ApJL, 817, 2, L18. 11 Kitzmann, D. (2017). arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07513. Kopparapu, R. K., Ramirez, R., Kasting, J. F., Eymet, V., Robinson, T. D., Mahadevan, S., ... & Deshpande, R. 2013, ApJ, 765, 2, 131. Kopparapu, R. K., Ramirez, R. M., SchottelKotte, J., Kasting, J. F., Domagal-Goldman, S., & Eymet, V. 2014, ApJL ,787, 2, L29. Leconte, J., Forget, F., Charnay, B., Wordsworth, R., & Pottier, A. (2013). Nature, 504(7479), 268-271. Mischna, M. A., Kasting, J. F., Pavlov, A., & Freedman, R. 2000, Icarus, 145, 2, 546-554. Montési, L. G., & Zuber, M. T. (2003). JGR:Planets, 108(E6). Pierrehumbert, R., & Gaidos, E. 2011, ApJL, 734, 1, L13. Ramirez, R. M., Kopparapu, R., Zugger, M. E., Robinson, T. D., Freedman, R., & Kasting, J. F. 2014, NatGe, 7, 1, 59-63. Ramirez, R. M., & Kaltenegger, L. 2014, ApJL, 797, 2, L25. Ramirez, R. M., & Kaltenegger, L. 2016, ApJ, 823, 1, 6. Ramirez, R.M. 2016, NatGe,9, 6, 413-414. Scaillet, B., & Gaillard, F. 2011, Nature, 480, 7375, 48-49. Seager, S., Bains, W., & Hu, R. 2013, ApJ, 777, 2, 95. Stanley, B. D., Hirschmann, M. M., & Withers, A. C. 2011, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 75, 20, 5987-6003. Tian, F., Toon, O. B., Pavlov, A. A., & De Sterck, H. 2005, Science, 308, 5724, 1014-1017. Trail, D., Watson, E. B., & Tailby, N. D. 2011, Natur, 480, 7375, 79-82. Stevenson, D. J. 1999, Natur, 400, 6739, 32-32. Wade, J., & Wood, B. J. 2005, E&PSL, 236, 1, 78-95. 12 Walker, J. C. 1977, New York: Macmillan, and London: Collier Macmillan, 1977, 318 pp. Wood, B. J., Walter, M. J., & Wade, J. 2006, Natur, 441, 7095, 825-833. Wordsworth, R. 2012, Icarus, 219, 1, 267-273. Wordsworth, R., & Pierrehumbert, R. 2013, Science, 339, 6115, 64-67. Wordsworth, R., Kalugina, Y., Lokshtanov, S., et al. (2017). GeoRL. doi: 10.1002/2016GL071766 Zsom, A., Kaltenegger, L., & Goldblatt, C. (2012). Icarus, 221(2), 603-616. 13
0902.3999	1	0902	2009-02-23T21:01:14	The Two Modes of Gas Giant Planet Formation	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	I argue for two modes of gas giant planet formation and discuss the conditions under which each mode operates. Gas giant planets at disk radii $r>100$ AU are likely to form in situ by disk instability, while core accretion plus gas capture remains the dominant formation mechanism for $r<100$ AU. During the mass accretion phase, mass loading can push disks toward fragmentation conditions at large $r$. Massive, extended disks can fragment into clumps of a few to tens of Jupiter masses. This is confirmed by radiation hydrodynamics simulations. The two modes of gas giant formation should lead to a bimodal distribution of gas giant semi-major axes. Because core accretion is expected to be less efficient in low-metallicity systems, the ratio of gas giants at large $r$ to planets at small $r$ should increase with decreasing metallicity.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The Two Modes of Gas Giant Planet Formation Aaron C. Boley Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, Zurich, CH-8057, Switzerland; [email protected] ABSTRACT I argue for two modes of gas giant planet formation and discuss the conditions under which each mode operates. Gas giant planets at disk radii r > 100 AU are likely to form in situ by disk instability, while core accretion plus gas capture remains the dominant formation mechanism for r < 100 AU. During the mass accretion phase, mass loading can push disks toward fragmentation conditions at large r. Massive, extended disks can fragment into clumps of a few to tens of Jupiter masses. This is confirmed by radiation hydrodynamics simulations. The two modes of gas giant formation should lead to a bimodal distribution of gas giant semi-major axes. Because core accretion is expected to be less efficient in low-metallicity systems, the ratio of gas giants at large r to planets at small r should increase with decreasing metallicity. Subject headings: planetary systems: planetary disks — hydrodynamics — instabilities — radiative transfer formation — planetary systems: proto- 1. Introduction Both core accretion plus gas capture (e.g., Pollack et al. 1996) and direct formation by disk instability (Cameron 1978; Boss 1997) can form gas giant planets in principle. In order for gravitational instabilities (GIs) to form gas giants directly, the Toomre (1964) Q = csκ/πGΣ, where cs is the sound speed, κ is the epicyclic frequency, and Σ is the surface density, must approach unity and the local cooling time must be (cid:46) the local orbit period (Gammie 2001; Rice et al. 2005; Rafikov 2005, 2007). An isothermal, low-Q is strongly susceptible to fragmentation (e.g., Tomley et al. 1994; Boss 1998; Nelson et al. 1998; Mayer et al. 2002; Pickett et al. 2003). Analytical work (e.g., Rafikov 2007) and radiation hydrodynamics simulations (Nelson et al. 2000; Cai et al. 2006, 2008; Boley et al. 2006, 2007b; Stamatellos & Whitworth 2008a; Boley & Durisen 2008) find that disk fragmentation inside r ∼ tens of AU is unlikely because – 2 – regions with high cooling rates and low Q are rare (cf, most recently, Boss 2008 and Mayer et al. 2007). When Q is low, the gas is cool, so cooling times are typically long. When cooling times are short, the gas is hot, so Q is typically high. In contrast, Boss (2004) argues that convection can increase the cooling rates enough to cause fragmentation. Likewise, Mayer et al. (2007) report convection-induced fragmentation in their simulations when the mean molecular weight is increased from 2.4 to 2.71. Boley et al. (2006) and Boley & Durisen (2008) argue in return that the reported convective motions are likely shock bores along the spiral shocks (Boley & Durisen 2006) or an artifact of suddenly changing the mean molecular weight. Moreover, Rafikov (2007) and Boley et al. (2006, 2007b) find that convection does not decrease cooling times enough to trigger fragmentation because sustained convection is regulated by the entropy gradient and energy must be radiated away at the disk’s surface. Core accretion seems to be the only option for gas giant formation inside r ∼ 100 AU. However, the recently-discovered substellar companions with wide semi-major axes a ∼ 100 AU and masses M ∼ few to tens MJ (e.g., Luhman et al. 2006; Lafreniere et al. 2008; Kalas et al. 2008) challenge the interpretation that core accretion is the sole formation mechanism for gas giants. The susceptibility of disks to fragmentation at large r remains an open question. Stamatellos et al. (2007; hereafter SHW2007) and Stamatellos & Whitworth (2009; hereafter SW2009) find that extended, massive disks can fragment under realistic conditions (cf Boss 2006); but, their results are based on running simulations with highly unstable initial conditions, which as argued here, can significantly change the outcome of disk evolution. of the flux, where ∇ · F = 4ρκpσT 4 for low optical depth τ =(cid:82) ∞ Consider a disk where the sound speed becomes constant with radius for large r. For Σ ∼ r−q, Q ∼ rqΩ ∼ rq−1.5. As long as q < 1.5, the stabilizing shear contribution to Q falls off faster than the destabilizing self-gravity contribution, and the disk can become susceptible to GIs. Now consider the radiative cooling time for some fluid element trad = /∇·F, where is the internal energy density of the gas. Using the free-streaming limit for the divergence −∞ ρκP dz, the cooling time can be approximated by trad ∼ Σc2 s/(4τ σT 4), where ρ is the mass density at temperature T and κP is the Planck mean opacity. For τ (cid:28) 1, radiative cooling becomes extremely inefficient. Because cooling in the optically thick disk is also inefficient, the τ ∼ 1 transition region may be the most conducive regime for disk fragmentation (e.g., Rafikov 2005). The cooling time in a disk with Σ ∼ 1 g cm−2, τ ∼ 0.1, and T ∼ 10 K, is trad ∼ 600 yr, which is less than the orbital period around a 1 M(cid:12) star at r ∼ 100 AU. What if the τ ∼ 1 and Q ∼ 1 regions do not coincide? Mass loading, i.e., mass accretion 1Boley et al. (2006) simulated a disk with a µ ∼ 2.7; they did not see fragmentation. – 3 – onto the disk, is crucial for driving fragmentation at r > 100 AU. Numerical fragmentation studies have focused mainly on thermal energy balance arguments. However, there are additional considerations when evaluating the stability of a disk against fragmentation. The rate that Q changes in a local region of a disk is d ln Q dt = 1 2 d ln c2 s dt + d ln κ dt − d ln Σ dt . (1) When GIs are in a self-regulating phase, the effective Shakura & Sunyeaev (1973) α tends toward a few hundredths or less (e.g., Gammie 2001; Lodato & Rice 2004; Mejia et al. 2005; Boley et al. 2006), so the timescale for Σ and κ to change due to mass transport should be much larger than the local dynamical time. For fragmentation criteria studies of isolated disks, the thermal energy term is the most relevant. In order to avoid fragmentation, the local cooling time for the gas tcool > f (γ)td, where td is the local gas orbital period and f (γ) is some function of the adiabatic index of order unity. In the local model formalism, the tcool criterion is associated with a critical effective αc ∼ 0.06 (Gammie 2001; Rice et al. 2005). This α-limit indicates the point at which local energy dissipation by GIs cannot balance cooling, and as a result, the disk fragments. Mc ≈ 3αcc3 In addition to energy transport, αc can be related to a critical mass flux Mc ≈ 3παcc2 sΣ/Ω. s/(GQ) (see also Goodman 2003; Matzner Substituting Q into this relation gives & Levin 2005). At large r, where the temperature of the disk approaches the envelope tem- perature, the ratio Mc/ Me ∼ 3αc/Q, where Me ∼ c3 s/G is the mass accretion onto the disk Me ∼ 2 × 10−5M(cid:12) yr−1. from the envelope. For an envelope temperature of T = 30 K, Because αc ∼ 0.06, mass loading can operate at multiple times the maximum local transport flux. Episodes of non-local transport and/or disk fragmentation should occur for realistic envelope accretion rates. I present results from radiative hydrodynamics simulations that show mass loading can drive a disk toward fragmentation at large r. The fragments form clumps with masses greater than a few MJ . Throughout this Letter, I refer to the inner disk as the region inside r ∼ 100 AU and the extended disk as the region outside this boundary. This transition radius is illustrative, but represents a reasonable estimate for where fragmentation becomes possible (e.g, Matzner & Levin 2005). 2. Methodology I use CHYMERA (Boley 2007) to model the formation of massive extended disks. CHYMERA is an Eulerian code that solves for the equations of hydrodynamics with self- gravity on an evenly spaced, cylindrical grid. The rotational states of molecular hydrogen – 4 – are taken into account (Boley et al. 2007a), and the radiative transfer scheme has passed a series of analytic tests. The radiative transfer algorithm and test results are presented in Boley et al. (2007b). D’Alessio et al. (2001) opacity tables are used for calculating optical depths, with a maximum grain radius amax = 1µm. In the following simulations, an equilib- rium ortho:parahydrogen ratio (O:P) is used. The gas is assumed to have a mixture of 0.73, 0.25, and 0.02 for hydrogen, helium, and metals, respectively. Preliminary simulations using the CHYMERA radiative transfer scheme show that the radiative cooling time is shorter than the local orbital time and that the disk is effectively isothermal, in agreement with the estimate in §1. For modeling spiral waves, the normal radiative transfer scheme is stable in these simulations because the gas temperature is never far from the incident irradiation temperature. However, for some preliminary simulations, the cooling algorithm became numerically unstable immediately after clump formation due to the sudden increase in temperature, creating highly disparate radiative transfer and hy- drodynamics timescales. In order to study fragmentation at large r, the following radiative cooling algorithm is used for the simulations presented here. The divergence of the flux ∇ · F = −(A/V )σ(T 4 − T 4 irr)f−1 τ , (2) where A/V is the cell area-to-volume ratio, Tirr is the incident irradiation on the disk at r, and fτ = ∆τ + 1/∆τ . The local optical depth across a cell is calculated by ∆τ = ρ(κRosseland(1− exp[−2∆τPlanck]) + κPlanck exp[−2∆τPlanck])V 1/3, where ∆τPlanck is an initial estimate using the Planck mean opacity. This cooling approximation goes to the free-streaming limit for small ∆τ and to zero for large ∆τ . In order to ensure that the algorithm is stable for large hydrodyamic time steps, the divergence of the flux is adjusted such that ∇ · F adjusted = ∇ · F exp[−(∆thydo/∆trad)2] + ρ(eequil − e)/∆thydro(1 − exp[−(∆thydro/∆trad)2]). (3) Here, e is the specific internal energy of the gas, eequil is the internal energy of the gas if it were at Tirr, ∆thydro is the Courant time step, and ∆trad = ρe/∇ · F is the radiative timescale. The irradiation temperature for these simulations is set to 30 K for all r. The central protostar’s position is integrated self-consistently with a softened potential, where Φstar = GMstar/(r− r(cid:48)2 + s2)1/2 for softening parameter s. In order to treat the force on the star, the mass in each cell is treated as a point mass at the cell’s center, with the same softening parameter used for the star. The star’s position is integrated from step i to i + 1 by the following: vi = vi−1/2 + 0.5ai∆ti−1, vi+1/2 = vi + 0.5ai∆ti, and xi+1 = xi + vi+1/2∆ti. This algorithm is sufficient for maintaining, on average, the system’s center of mass at the grid center. – 5 – Each disk is evolved on an r, φ , z = 256, 512, 64 grid, with a spatial resolution of ∆r, r∆φ, and ∆z = 2, 2πr/512, 2 AU. Mirror symmetry is assumed about the midplane, and the outer grid boundaries are outflow boundaries. There is an outflow boundary near the star, but negligible mass passes through it in these simulations. Mass is added to the grid near the top of the z outflow boundary between r = 60 and 300 AU. The added mass is given a density profile of ρ ∼ r−p, a specific angular momentum (GMstarr3/(r2 + s2))1/2, an initial vr = 0, and an initial vz = −(2GMstar/r)1/2. Upon reaching a disk mass of 0.1 M(cid:12), a random density perturbation is imposed with a maximum variation of ±10%. For all simulations, the disk is stable against GIs when the noise is added. For two of the simulations (see below) a softening of s = 20 AU was applied. This softening causes an error in the epicyclic frequency of just under 10% at r ∼ 50 AU when compared with the Keplerian frequency and 3% at r ∼ 100 AU. 3. Simulations and Results Four simulations (SIMA, SIMB, SIMC, and SIMD) are shown in Figure 1. All disks except for SIMC fragment, and all disks evolve isothermally except in very high-density regions. Because the vertically integrated midplane τ never becomes larger than a few, except in clumps, the above radiative transfer approximation is reasonable. Clumps reach temperatures in excess of 100 K. (1) SIMA: The protostar is set to 0.3 M(cid:12). The initial mass loading Md ∼ 10−4M(cid:12) yr−1 until the disk mass Md = 0.1M(cid:12), after which Md is reduced to 10−5M(cid:12) yr−1. The infall density profile is set to p = 1.5. A softening s = 20 AU is used because the accretion rate is less than what is used in the other simulations, requiring a longer evolution. The simulation is evolved for 16400 yr (3 P200, orbital periods at r ∼ 200 AU), and reaches a disk mass of 0.21 M(cid:12) before the simulation is stopped. Dense spiral waves develop, and a condensation forms near r ∼ 70 AU. Fragmentation appears to be near wave corotation, in agreement with Durisen et al. (2008). By the end of the simulation, the clump has grown to 20 MJ and is located at r ∼ 110 AU. As a cautionary check, a portion of this simulation was rerun with CHYMERA’s normal radiative transfer algorithm. The disk behaved isothermally. (2) SIMB: The protostar is set to 1 M(cid:12), and Md ∼ 10−4M(cid:12) yr−1 for the duration of the simulation. The simulation is evolved for 5000 yr (∼ 1.8 P200), and the disk grows to 0.52 M(cid:12). The infall density profile p = 1.5, and no softening is applied. Mass loading drives Q below unity outside r ∼ 100 AU, and the disk fragments into 11 condensations by the time the simulation is stopped, ranging in mass from ∼ 4 to 14 MJ . – 6 – (3) SIMC: Similar to SIMB, but the mass accretion is halted when Md = 0.33M(cid:12). At this mass, Q in a region near r ∼ 90 AU drops below unity. This simulation investigates whether the disk can recover from the initial mass loading and avoid fragmentation. When GIs did set in, they rapidly transported mass both away and toward the star, so a softening of s = 20 AU was applied and the inner disk boundary was moved from r ∼ 20 AU to r ∼ 6 AU. The initial simulation without softening shows a similar behavior, but was not evolved beyond the initial burst of GIs. The burst transports mass efficiently and Q reaches a mass- weighted average Q ∼ 1.3 between r ∼ 100 and 200 AU. This simulation is evolved for 9200 yr (∼ 3.3 P200). Although a longer integration may be required to ascertain whether the disk will eventually fragment, the simulation does indicate that fragmentation is not guaranteed in the outer disk. (4) SIMD: The protostar is set to 1 M(cid:12), and the mass accretion rate is 10−4M(cid:12) yr−1. As in SIMC, the mass accretion is halted once Md = 0.33M(cid:12). The density profile for the infalling material p = 0.5. This choice for p places the minimum Q further out in the disk, such that Q first drops below unity near r ∼ 140 AU. Unlike SIMC, the spiral waves are unable to redistribute the mass enough to avoid fragmentation. The disk forms a 6 MJ clump at r ∼ 140 AU, which is subsequently transported to just inside r ∼ 100 AU and grows to 11 MJ by the end of the simulation. The disk is evolved for 8600 yr (∼ 3 P200). Wide semi-major axis, a, gas giants (WaGGs) and at least one brown dwarf (BD) are formed in these simulations. All disks go through strong burst-like phases, consistent with the arguments in §1. Although a high M is used for SIMB, SIMC, and SIMD, disk fragmentation M ∼ 10−5M(cid:12) yr−1, as seen in SIMA. The local Jeans length is resolved is still expected for by at least four cells throughout the simulations (Truelove et al. 1997; Nelson 2006), where the local cell size is taken to be the geometric mean of the cell dimensions. These results indicate that fragmentation at large disk radii should be common and that WaGGs can be explained by in situ formation. These simulations demonstrate that the number or fragments and the fragment masses depend on how the disk is assembled. Studies investigating the clump mass spectrum of extended, massive protoplanetary disks, e.g., SW2009, are very sensitive to initial conditions. Although the fate of these clumps is unknown, the results of Mayer et al. (2004) and SW2009 indicate that some condensations can survive. Radiative feedback, which is ne- glected in the current radiative cooling algorithm, should limit clump growth. Detailed simulations that can resolve the photosphere of a fragment are required to address this concern, which is beyond the resolution limit in these simulations. These disks are evolved through only one burst. Vorobyov & Basu (2005; hereafter VB2005) found in their 2D simulations that several bursts can occur during the disk accretion – 7 – phase. Whether a system forms WaGGs/BDs and retains them may be dependent on the details of the last GI burst. Because these simulations suggest that disks should be susceptible to fragmentation during their formation, they also support the possibility of a clump-driven outburst mechanism for FU Orionis objects (VB2005). The FU Orionis phenomenon is characterized by a rapid increase in the optical brightness of a young T Tauri object, typically 5 magnitudes over a few to tens of years. Accretion from the inner disk onto the star is estimated to be as high as 10−4M(cid:12) yr−1 (Hartmann & Kenyon 1996). Because FU Ori objects have decay timescales of ∼ 100 yr, an entire minimum mass solar nebula (∼ 0.01 M(cid:12)) can be accreted onto the protostar during an event. The best explanation for the optical outburst is a thermal instability (TI) (Bell & Lin 1994). However, prodigious mass flux through r ∼ 0.1 AU seems to be required to drive the TI. A tidally-disrupted WaGG could supply the inner disk with 0.01 M(cid:12) mass, even when only the extended disk is gravitationally unstable. Helled et al. (2006) calculated the contraction time for a Jupiter-mass clump, and found that such a clump takes 3 × 105 yr to reach a central temperature of 2000 K, i.e., the temperature required to dissociate enough H2 to lead to rapid collapse. This suggests that a WaGG has sufficient time to be transported inside r ∼ 1 AU before it reaches mean densities that are high enough to avoid tidal disruption, where the disruption radius rt ∼ 8 × 10−3(¯ρ/g cm−3)−1/3(M/M(cid:12))1/3 AU. The Helled et al. model remains at a mean density of ¯ρ ∼ 2× 10−7 g cm−3 for ∼ 105 yr. This density corresponds to a disruption radius rt ∼ 1 AU for a 0.3 M(cid:12) star. An immediate observational signature of this mechanism would be a large shift in the radial velocity of the protostar just before an outburst. 4. The Two Modes of Planet Formation Boss’s (1997) advancement of the disk instability mechanism has spawned a decade’s worth of work examining GIs as a formation mechanism for gas giant planets (see Durisen et al.’s 2007 review). One of the principal reasons for the mechanism remaining contested for so long is that, like core accretion, the mechanism works under the right conditions. Rafikov (2005, 2007), Boley et al. (2006, 2007b), Stamatellos & Whitworth 2008, and Boley & Durisen (2008) argue that radiative cooling timescales are too long for fragmentation out to r ∼ 40 AU and that sustained convection does not cause fragmentation. This is also consistent with Nelson et al.’s (2000) 2D radiative hydrodynamics simulations, who assumed a polytropic vertical density structure in order to calculate a photosphere temperature. Con- vection pushes the entropy gradient toward zero, so a vertical polytropic density stratification assumes efficient convection. Observationally, the planet-metallicity relationship (Valenti & Fischer 2005) indicates that planet formation favors a high-metallicity environment, which is strong evidence for core accretion (cf Boss 2005). The estimated core masses of Jupiter and – 8 – Saturn (Saumon & Guillot 2004; Militzer et al. 2008), along with the ice giants, support the core accretion mechanism. This evidence suggests that the dominant formation mechanism for gas giants inside r ∼ 100 AU is core accretion. In contrast to the conditions inside r ∼ 100 AU, optical depths should approach unity for a substantial ∆r in the extended disk, as occurs in these simulations. Efficient radiative cooling, long orbital periods, and an equilibrium O:P ratio combine to favor fragmentation in the extended disk. WaGG formation as a result of mass loading represents the first mode of planet formation, and takes place in the first 105 yr of the disk’s lifetime. Core accretion, which can continue after the main disk formation phase, represents the slower, second mode of gas giant formation. The survival of WaGGs will likely depend on the disk and mass accretion conditions during the last burst of GI activity. Both core accretion and disk instability are able to form gas giants under suitable In the inner disk, conditions favor core accretion, and in the extended disk, conditions. conditions favor disk instability. Scattering and planet-disk interactions should wash out any strict desert between the two formation regimes, but a bimodal population of gas giant planet semi-major axes should still be present. Because core accretion is expected to be less efficient in low-metallicity systems, the ratio of WaGGs to planets at small r should increase with decreasing metallicity. I would like to thank the referee for pointing out a complementary study by Rafikov (2009, astro-ph/0901.4739), which was posted during the review of this manuscript. Rafikov’s work discusses fragmentation conditions and the stability of disks against high M ’s, while the study presented here demonstrates that a disk can be pushed realistically toward frag- mentation. I thank R. H. Durisen, L. Mayer, G. Lake, R. Teyssier, O. Agertz, D. Stamatellos, and the referee for comments that improved this manuscript. This research was supported by a Swiss Federal Grant and the University of Zurich. The presented simulations were run on NASA Advanced Supercomputing facilities. – 9 – REFERENCES Bell, K. R., & Lin, D. N. C. 1994, ApJ, 427, 987 Boley, A. C. 2007, Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University Boley, A. C., & Durisen, R. H. 2006, ApJ, 641, 534 –. 2008, ApJ, 685, 1193 Boley, A. C., Durisen, R. H., Nordlund, A, & Lord, J. 2007b, ApJ, 665, 1254 Boley, A. C., Hartquist, T. W., Durisen, R. H., & Michael, S. 2007a, ApJ, 656, L89 Boley, A. C., Mej´ıa, A. C., Durisen, R. H., Cai, K., Pickett, M. K., & D’Alessio, P. 2006, 651, 517 Boss, A. P. 1997, Sci, 276, 5320, 1836 –. 1998, ApJ, 503, 923 –. 2004, ApJ, 610, 456 –. 2005, ApJ, 629, 535 –. 2006, ApJ, 637, L137 –. 2008, ApJ, 677, 607 Cai, K., Durisen, R. H., Michael, S., Boley, A. C., Mej´ıa, A. C., Pickett, M. K., & D’Alessio, P. 2006, ApJ, 636, L149 Cameron, A. G. .W. 1978, M&P, 18, 5 D’Alessio, P., Calvet, N., & Hartmann, L. 2001, ApJ, 553, 321 Durisen, R. H., Boss, A., Mayer, L., Nelson, A., Quinn, T., & Rice, K. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 607 Durisen, R. H., Hartquist, T. W., & Pickett, M. K. 2008, Ap&SS, 317, 3D –. 2001, ApJ, 553, 174 Goodman, J. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 937 – 10 – Hartmann, L., & Kenyon, S. J. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 207 Helled, R., Podolak, M., & Kovetz, A. 2006, Icarus, 185, Issue 1, 64 Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Chiang, E., Fitzgerald, M. P., Clampin, M., Kite, E. S., Stapelfeldt, K., Marois, C., Krist, J. 2008, arXiv:0811.1994 Lafreniere, D., Jayawardhana, R., & van Kerkwijk, M. H. (2008), ApJ, 689, L153 Lodato, G., & Rice, W. K. M. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 630 Luhman, K. L., Wilson, J. C., Brandner, W., Skrutskie, M. F., Nelson, M. J., Smith, J. D., Peterson, D. E., Cushing, M. C., & Young, E. 2006, ApJL, 649, 894 Matzner, C. D., & Levin, Y. 2005, ApJ, 628, 817 Mayer, L., Lufkin, G., Quinn, T., & Wadsley, J. 2007, ApJ, 661, 77 Mayer, L., Lufkin, G., Quinn, T., & Wadsley, J. 2002, Sci, 298, 1756 Mayer, L., Quinn, T., Wadsley, J., & Stadel, J. 2004, ApJ, 609, 1045 Militzer, B., Hubbard, W. B., Vorberger, J., Tamblyn, I., & Bonev, S. A. 2008, ApJ, 688, L45 Mej´ıa, A. C., Durisen, R. H., Pickett, M. K., & Cai, K. 2005, ApJ, 619, 1098 Nelson, A. F. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1039 Nelson, A. F., Benz, W., Adams, F. C., & Arnett, D. 1998, ApJ, 502, 342 Nelson, A. F., Benz, W., & Ruzmaikina, T. V. 2000, ApJ, 529, 357 Pickett, B. K., Mej´ıa, A. C., Durisen, R. H., Cassen, P. M., Berry, D. K., & Link, R. P. 2003, ApJ, 590, 1060 Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. 1996, Icarus, 124, 63 Rafikov, R. R. 2005, ApJ, 621, L69 –. 2007, ApJ, 662, 642 Rice, W. K. M, Lodato, G., & Armitage, P. J. 2005, MNRAS, 364, L56 Saumon, D., & Guillot, T. 2004, ApJ, 609, 1170 – 11 – Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337 Stamatellos, D., Hubber, D. A., & Whitworth, A. P. 2007, MNRAS, 382, L30 Stamatellos, D., & Whitworth, A. P. 2008, A&A, 480, 879 Stamatellos, D., & Whitworth, A. P. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 413 Tomley, L., Steiman-Cameron, T. Y., Cassen, P. 1994, ApJ, 422, 850 Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217 Truelove, J. K., Klein, R. I., McKee, C. F., Holliman, J. H., II, Howell, L. H., Greenough, J. A. 1997, ApJ, 489, L179 Valenti, J. A., & Fischer, D. A. 2005, ApJS, 159, 141 Vorobyov, E. I., & Basu, S. 2005, ApJ, 633, 137 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. – 12 – Fig. 1.— Surface density snapshots at the end of each simulation. Strong bursts of GI activity occur in each disk. For three of the simulations, these bursts lead to fragmentation and clump formation. Movies of these simulations can be viewed at http://www.aaroncboley.net under the Movies tab.
1712.00437	1	1712	2017-12-01T18:38:41	Tumbling motion of 1I/'Oumuamua reveals body's violent past	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Models of the Solar System evolution show that almost all the primitive material leftover from the formation of the planets was ejected to the interstellar space as a result of dynamical instabilities. Accordingly, minor bodies should also be ejected from other planetary systems and should be abundant in the interstellar space. The number density of such objects, and prospects for their detection as they penetrate through the Solar System, were speculated about for decades, recently rising high hopes with the Pan-STARRS and LSST surveys. These expectations materialized on 18 October 2017 with the Pan-STARRS's discovery of 1I/'Oumuamua. Here we report homogeneous photometric observations of this body from Gemini North, which densely cover a total of 8 hr over two nights. A combined ultra-deep image of 1I/'Oumuamua shows no signs of cometary activity, confirming the results from earlier, less sensitive searches. Our data also show an enormous range of brightness variations > 2.5 mag, larger than ever observed in the population of Solar System objects, suggesting a very elongated shape of the body. But most significantly, the light curve does not repeat exactly from one rotation cycle to another and its double-peaked periodicity of 7.5483 $\pm$ 0.0073 hr from our data is inconsistent with earlier determinations. These are clear signs of a tumbling motion, a remarkable characteristic of 1I/'Oumuamua's rotation, consistent with a catastrophic collision in the distant past. This first example of an impacted minor body of exosolar origin indicates that collisional evolution of minor body populations in other planetary systems is not uncommon.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Tumbling motion of 1I/'Oumuamua reveals body's violent past* M. Drahus1, P. Guzik1, W. Waniak1, B. Handzlik1, S. Kurowski1, S. Xu2 1 Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland ([email protected]) 2 Gemini Observatory, Hilo, HI, USA Models of the Solar System evolution show that almost all the primitive material leftover from the formation of the planets was ejected to the interstellar space as a result of dynamical instabilities1. Accordingly, minor bodies should also be ejected from other planetary systems and should be abundant in the interstellar space2. The number density of such objects, and prospects for their detection as they penetrate through the Solar System, were speculated about for decades3,4, recently rising high hopes with the Pan-STARRS5,6 and LSST7 surveys. These expectations materialized on 18 October 2017 with the Pan-STARRS's discovery of 1I/'Oumuamua8. Here we report homogeneous photometric observations of this body from Gemini North, which densely cover a total of 8 hr over two nights. A combined ultra-deep image of 1I/'Oumuamua shows no signs of cometary activity, confirming the results from earlier, less sensitive searches9–12. Our data also show an enormous range of brightness variations > 2.5 mag9, larger than ever observed in the population of Solar System objects, suggesting a very elongated shape of the body. But most significantly, the light curve does not repeat exactly from one rotation cycle to another and its double-peaked periodicity of 7.5483±0.0073 hr from our data is inconsistent with earlier determinations9,10,13–15. These are clear signs of a tumbling motion, a remarkable characteristic of 1I/'Oumuamua's rotation, consistent with a catastrophic collision in the distant past. This first example of an impacted minor body of exosolar origin indicates that collisional evolution of minor body populations in other planetary systems is not uncommon. Based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States), the National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva (Argentina), and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (Brazil). 1 1I/'Oumuamua8 is a newly discovered minor body on a strongly hyperbolic trajectory, which starkly contrasts with even the most extreme cometary orbits bound to the Sun (Figure 1) and can only be explained by having origin far in the interstellar space8,16,17. Unsurprisingly, the Galactic velocity vector of this object is consistent with the median velocity vector of nearby stars17. 1I/'Oumuamua entered the Solar system from the direction of the Solar apex with a large hyperbolic excess speed of 26 km s-1, then reached perihelion at 0.26 au from the Sun on 9 September 2017, approached the Earth to 0.16 au on 16 October 2017, and is currently on its way back to the interstellar space. Previous studies have not detected any signs of cometary activity9–12, found optical colors consistent with Solar System's C-type and D-type asteroids10,13,14 and reported an average V-band absolute magnitude of 22.8 to 23.010,12. Such an intrinsically faint body could be discovered only thanks to the close Earth flyby in October 2017, which created a tremendous opportunity for the first detailed characterization of a minor object of exosolar origin. We were awarded Director's Discretionary Time on the 8.1 m Gemini North telescope (program GN- 2017B-DD-7) to observe this unique object. On 27 and 28 October 2017 we obtained a total of 442 r'-band18 images using a 30 sec integration time. The sky was photometric and median seeing close to 0.6 arcsec in FWHM throughout the observations. We took data with the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS), which consists of three adjacent Hamamatsu CCDs, providing imaging over a 5.5×5.5 arcmin field of view19. The instrument was configured to provide 2×2 binning and 0.1614 arcsec effective pixels. The images were corrected for overscan, bias, and flatfield in the standard manner. Then, using our established technique20, we subtracted background stars and galaxies interfering with 1I/'Oumuamua as they moved across the field of view. As a result, we obtained uncontaminated images of the target 2 on a very clean and uniform background, suitable for accurate time-resolved photometry (see Methods). The frames were then visually inspected for artifacts, such as cosmic ray hits and residual signal from imperfect subtraction of very bright background objects at a location of 1I/'Oumuamua. This procedure resulted in the rejection of 11 images, a small number compared to the remaining 431 images available for analysis. The restricted dataset was photometrically measured using the Aperture Photometry Tool21 configured in median sky subtraction mode. Brightness of 1I/'Oumuamua was determined from a circular aperture of a constant 2.26 arcsec (14 pixels) diameter, which ensured negligible influence of seeing variations and acceptable level of background noise contribution. We also made similar measurements of brighter background stars, employing this time a larger aperture of 4.8 arcsec (30 pixels) to account for the elongation of stellar profiles caused by rapid non-sidereal tracking of the target. Differential photometry of 1I/'Oumuamua was then reduced to the observing geometry on the first night and absolute calibrated through the background stars available in the SDSS Photometric catalog22. In Figure 2 we present a mean combined image of 1I/'Oumuamua, having an effective integration time of 214.5 min. No signs of cometary activity can be seen, consistent with earlier reports9–12, however, the sensitivity of our image is a factor of 2.6 to 9.5 higher than those achieved by the previous searches. Our light curve of 1I/'Oumuamua densely covers a total of 8 hr over two nights. The median flux corresponds to an observed r'-band magnitude of 22.25 and an absolute magnitude of 22.02, the latter calculated in the standard way assuming the asteroidal photometric phase function23 with a parameter G = 0.15 characteristic of solar-system C-types24. Our absolute magnitude is broadly consistent with the absolute magnitudes reported before10,14. More interestingly, the range of brightness variations is enormous, at least a factor of ten, or > 2.5 mag, which exceeds even the largest rotational variations observed in the entire population of 16,419 solar-system asteroids with measured light curves (Figure 1). The light curve of 1I/'Oumuamua was 3 scrutinized for periodicity using the classical Phase Dispersion Minimization algorithm25 with implemented inverse-variance weighting of the data points26. Periodograms (see example in Figure 3) systematically show the best data phasing for a frequency of 0.13248±0.00013 hr-1, or 7.5483±0.0073 hr period, implying a double-peaked phased light curve (Figure 4), most easily explained by shape-dominated brightness variations. Though not as good, a corresponding single- peaked phasing, consistent with albedo-dominated brightness variations, is also clearly indicated by the periodograms at approximately twice the double-peaked frequency, 0.26596±0.00026 hr-1, or half the double-peaked period, 3.7599±0.0037 hr. Other periodicities offer implausible data phasings and can be safely excluded. We proceed assuming shape-dominated brightness variations and, consequently, adopt the double-peaked periodicity as 1I/'Oumuamua's synodic rotation period. From Hapke modeling of the light curve27 we find the long-to-short axis ratio of > 4.63 and the effective radius of about 80 m (see Methods). The very large elongation together with the measured moderate rotation rate require a density of > 1034 kg m-3 to prevent the body from falling apart. This limit is calculated under the assumption that the tensile strength is negligible, which may or may not be true for 1I/'Oumuamua. Nonetheless, our estimate shows that the body may be strengthless and still have a density within the ranges of typical Solar System asteroids28, in contrast with the previous revelations9,10,14. While the light curve of 1I/'Oumuamua is clearly periodic, it does not repeat exactly from one rotation cycle to another. As we cannot explain this behavior by instrumental effects, we conclude that it is a real feature of the light curve, intrinsic to the object. Furthermore, the light curve does not appear to have a single, unique periodicity because the rotation periods reported by other studies9,10,13–15 differ from one another and are inconsistent with our data (Figure 5). We recognize these peculiarities as the characteristic signatures of non-principal-axis (or excited) rotation, also 4 often referred to as tumbling29,30, which has significant consequences for understanding the distant history of this object. Although the vast majority of Solar System minor bodies do not show any measurable deviations from simple rotation, a small fraction of asteroids29,31 and a few comets32,33 have been identified as tumblers. In particular, comet 1P/Halley was the first minor body found in non-principal-axis rotation state32 and, subsequently, asteroid (4179) Toutatis was identified as the first tumbler among asteroids34. Rotational excitation occurs mainly through collisions and, restricted to comets, sublimation torques. A tumbler then dissipates rotational energy due to stresses and strains resulting from complex rotation, and returns to simple, minimum-energy rotation state on a certain timescale. The damping timescale depends on the object's size, shape, density, stiffness, and rotation rate, and ranges from hundreds years to hundreds of billions years for the known Solar System asteroids35. Detailed quantification of 1I/'Oumuamua's complex rotation state is beyond the scope of this paper. Here we explore the fundamental fact that the body was once excited and has not fully relaxed yet. Evidently, the excitation is not easily explainable by sublimation torques. First, 1I/'Oumuamua does not show any signs of active outgassing despite a superb sensitivity of our combined image (Figure 2) and exceptionally favorable orbital circumstances, and second, it is unlikely that the body was active in the past because the sublimation levels required to excite its rotation would also generate enormous changes in the rotation rate, quickly leading to rotational instability and disruption. Instead, the complex rotation state of 1I/'Oumuamua most probably originates from an impact. Collisional excitation of this body in our Solar System is hardly possible, though, because of the rarity of collisions even in the (not so) dense main asteroid belt36 and because 1I/'Oumuamua missed the belt at a safe distance and spent very little time close to the ecliptic plane due to the 5 highly inclined orbit and the large orbital speed. A sensitive non-detection of a body's debris trail (Figure 2), starkly contrasting with the prominent trail of the similarly-sized impacted asteroid P/2010 A237, is also not in favor of a very recent collision. Rather, we believe that 1I/'Oumuamua was excited in another planetary system – presumably its home system – in the distant past. A damping time scales of typical rubble pile asteroids having the same effective size and rotation rate as 1I/'Oumuamua, and body's minimum allowable axis ratio, is of about 1 Gyr38. This appears to be long enough to preserve the signs of collisional excitation over the timescale of a typical interstellar exile11, supporting our conclusion. Whether 1I/'Oumuamua was excited via a giant collision, giving birth to this object, or impacted by another small body, is unclear, but both scenarios lead to the same conclusion that collisional processing of minor body populations in exoplanetary systems is not uncommon. Supposedly, 1I/'Oumuamua was ejected from its home system with a large number of similar bodies during a period of dynamical instability1 when frequent collisions are expected. References 1. Woolum, D. S. & Cassen, P. M. The origin of the Solar System. in Encyclopedia of the Solar System (eds. Weissman, P. R., McFadden, L.-A. & Johnson, T. V.) 27–28 (1999). 2. Moro-Martín, A., Turner, E. L. & Loeb, A. Will the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Detect Extra- Solar Planetesimals Entering the Solar System? Astrophys. J. 704, 733–742 (2009). 3. Sekanina, Z. A probability of encounter with interstellar comets and the likelihood of their existence. Icarus 27, 123–133 (1976). 4. Stern, S. A. On the number density of interstellar comets as a constraint on the formation rate of planetary systems. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 102, 793–795 (1990). 5. Jewitt, D. Project Pan-STARRS and the Outer Solar System. Earth Moon Planets 92, 465–476 (2003). 6 6. Francis, P. J. The Demographics of Long-Period Comets. Astrophys. J. 635, 1348–1361 (2005). 7. Cook, N. V., Ragozzine, D., Granvik, M. & Stephens, D. C. Realistic Detectability of Close Interstellar Comets. Astrophys. J. 825, 51 (2016). 8. Williams, G. MPEC 2017-U181: COMET C/2017 U1 (PANSTARRS). Available at: https://www.minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K17/K17UI1.html. (Accessed: 18th November 2017) 9. Meech, K. J. et al. A brief visit from a red and extremely elongated interstellar asteroid. Nature (2017). 10. Jewitt, D. et al. Interstellar Interloper 1I/2017 U1: Observations from the NOT and WIYN Telescopes. ArXiv171105687 Astro-Ph (2017). 11. Ye, Q.-Z., Zhang, Q., Kelley, M. S. P. & Brown, P. G. 1I/2017 U1 (`Oumuamua) is Hot: Imaging, Spectroscopy and Search of Meteor Activity. ArXiv171102320 Astro-Ph (2017). 12. Knight, M. M. et al. The rotation period and shape of the hyperbolic asteroid A/2017 U1 from its lightcurve. ArXiv171101402 Astro-Ph (2017). 13. Bolin, B. T. et al. APO Time Resolved Color Photometry of Highly-Elongated Interstellar Object 1I/'Oumuamua. ArXiv171104927 Astro-Ph (2017). 14. Bannister, M. T. et al. Col-OSSOS: Colors of the Interstellar Planetesimal 1I/2017 U1 in Context with the Solar System. ArXiv171106214 Astro-Ph (2017). 15. Feng, F. & Jones, H. R. A. `Oumuamua as a messenger from the Local Association. ArXiv171108800 Astro-Ph (2017). 16. Marcos, C. de la F. & Marcos, R. de la F. Pole, Pericenter, and Nodes of the Interstellar Minor Body A/2017 U1. Res. Notes AAS 1, 5 (2017). 17. Mamajek, E. Kinematics of the Interstellar Vagabond A/2017 U1. ArXiv171011364 Astro-Ph (2017). 7 18. Hook, I. M. et al. The Gemini-North Multi-Object Spectrograph: Performance in Imaging, Long-Slit, and Multi-Object Spectroscopic Modes. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 116, 425–440 (2004). 19. Fukugita, M. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System. Astron. J. 111, 1748 (1996). 20. Drahus, M. et al. Fast Rotation and Trailing Fragments of the Active Asteroid P/2012 F5 (Gibbs). Astrophys. J. Lett. 802, L8 (2015). 21. Laher, R. R. et al. Aperture Photometry Tool. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 124, 737 (2012). 22. Eisenstein, D. J. et al. SDSS-III: Massive Spectroscopic Surveys of the Distant Universe, the Milky Way, and Extra-Solar Planetary Systems. Astron. J. 142, 72 (2011). 23. Bowell, E., Hapke, B. & Domingue, D. Application of photometric models to asteroids. in Asteroids II (eds. Binzel, R. & Gehrels, T.) 524 (Univ. Arizona Press, 1989). 24. Luu, J. & Jewitt, D. On the relative numbers of C types and S types among near-earth asteroids. Astron. J. 98, 1905–1911 (1989). 25. Stellingwerf, R. F. Period determination using phase dispersion minimization. Astrophys. J. 224, 953–960 (1978). 26. Drahus, M. & Waniak, W. Non-constant rotation period of Comet C/2001 K5 (LINEAR). Icarus 185, 544–557 (2006). 27. Hapke, B. Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy. (Cambridge University Press, 2012). 28. Hilton, J. L. Asteroid Masses and Densities. in Asteroids III 103–112 (2002). 29. Pravec, P. et al. Tumbling asteroids. Icarus 173, 108–131 (2005). 30. Samarasinha, N. H. Rotational excitation and damping as probes of interior structures of asteroids and comets. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 43, 1063–1073 (2008). 8 31. Warner, B. D., Harris, A. W. & Pravec, P. The asteroid lightcurve database. Icarus 202, 134–146 (2009). 32. Belton, M. J. S., Julian, W. H., Jay Anderson, A. & Mueller, B. E. A. The spin state and homogeneity of comet Halley's nucleus. Icarus 93, 183–193 (1991). 33. Belton, M. J. S. et al. The complex spin state of 103P/Hartley 2: Kinematics and orientation in space. Icarus 222, 595–609 (2013). 34. Hudson, R. S. & Ostro, S. J. Shape and Non-Principal Axis Spin State of Asteroid 4179 Toutatis. Science 270, 84–86 (1995). 35. Pravec, P. et al. The tumbling spin state of (99942) Apophis. Icarus 233, 48–60 (2014). 36. Bottke, W. F. et al. Linking the collisional history of the main asteroid belt to its dynamical excitation and depletion. Icarus 179, 63–94 (2005). 37. Kim, Y., Ishiguro, M., Michikami, T. & Nakamura, A. M. Anisotropic Ejection from Active Asteroid P/2010 A2: An Implication of Impact Shattering on an Asteroid. Astron. J. 153, 228 (2017). 38. Breiter, S., Rożek, A. & Vokrouhlický, D. Stress field and spin axis relaxation for inelastic triaxial ellipsoids. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 427, 755–769 (2012). Acknowledgements M.D., P.G. and B.H. are grateful for support from the National Science Centre of Poland through a SONATA BIS grant no. 2016/22/E/ST9/00109. We thank the staff of the Gemini Observatory for assistance and are indebted to the Director of Gemini Observatory for allocating Gemini North time for this program. 9 Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests. Methods Image cleaning. In order to obtain accurate time-resolved photometry of 1I/'Oumuamua, it was necessary to carefully subtract a dense background of stars and galaxies along its trajectory. To remove the background from a given image, we mean combined up to six background-equalized and flux-normalized images taken around the same time and subtracted the result of this operation from the reference image. We did not use the nearest images from a consecutive series to avoid contaminating the photometric background annulus with the object's signal. An example of the application of this technique to our 1I/'Oumuamua data is presented in Figure S1. Light curve modeling. We synthesized the light curve of 1I/'Omuamua with the Hapke approach27, using MIMSA (modified isotropic multiple scattering approximation) with SHOE (shadow-hiding opposition effect) and macroscopic roughness influencing reflectance properties. Colorimetric and spectroscopic observations have revealed that the reflectance spectrum of this object is close to those of the Solar System C- or D-type asteroids, Trojans, or comets10,11,13,39. We adopted in our model a set of reasonable literature values for the reflectance parameters of C-type asteroids40, such as a single scattering albedo of 0.037, an opposition surge amplitude and width of 0.20 and 0.025, respectively, the asymmetry factor in the Henyey-Greenstein particle phase function equal to -0.47, as well as an average topographic slope angle of macroscopic roughness of 20°. For simplicity, we assumed that 10 1I/'Oumuamua has a shape of a prolate spheroid. To test how the solution depends on the spin axis orientation we probed a number of directions with respect to the line of sight (aspect angle θ) and the Sun-object-observer plane (polar angle φ measured counterclockwise from the object-Sun direction as seen from observer position). This orientation has been taken for the geometry of sight on 28 October 2017, 00:00 UT and fixed in the external, inertial frame for our whole observing run. We have checked how the peak-to-peak amplitude of the light curve depends on the axial ratio for different orientations of the spin pole. A dependency of the flux ratio versus the axial ratio is presented in Figure S2. Even an enormous amplitude of the light curve does not necessarily mean a huge axial ratio. We found that to generate a 2.5-mag amplitude, an axial ratio can be as low as 4.63, inconsistent with the recently published values9,10,13. Large axial ratios were reported with the assumption that the brightness variation comes purely from cross-section changes. Our lower limit is a consequence of the assumed reflectance properties of the asteroid surface and partial shadowing due to over 20° phase angle. When a phase angle is far from 0° and the body is elongated, shadowing effects as well as asymmetry of the phase function have a strong influence on an observed light curve. Moreover, for aspect angles smaller than 60° it is virtually impossible to obtain a peak-to-peak amplitude consistent with 1I/'Oumuamua in spite of blowing up the axial ratio to abnormal values. Thus we conclude that aspect angle must be larger than 60°. 11 Figures Figure 1. 1I/'Oumuamua in the context of known minor Solar System bodies. Top: Distribution of the original reciprocal semi-major axes of the near-parabolic comets41. Middle: Distribution of the light curve amplitudes of small (left) and all (right) asteroids31. Bottom: Distribution of the rotation periods of small (left) and all (right) asteroids31. Small asteroids are defined as objects with diameters < 200 m. 12 Figure 2. Deep stack of our r'-band time series, having an effective integration time of 214.5 min. The negative images of the target to the left and right of the actual positive image were produced by our background subtraction algorithm and do not affect the photometry. The presented region is 5.5×5.5 arcmin, North is to the top and East to the left. Despite having a very high surface brightness sensitivity of 28.1 mag arcsec-2 measured in a 1 arcsec2 region, the image does not show any signs of cometary activity. 13 Figure 3. Phase Dispersion Minimization periodogram calculated with 25 bins and 5 covers for our time series25,26. Red indicates the best periodicity solution for a frequency of 0.13248±0.00013 hr-1, or 7.5483±0.0073 hr period, consistent with a double-peaked phased light curve. 14 Figure 4. Our data phased for the best periodicity solution, Prot = 7.5483 hr. It is evident that the light curve does not repeat exactly from one night (27 October 2017 UT) to another (28 October 2017 UT). 15 Figure 5. The same as before but phased for 6.96 hr found by Feng et al.15 (top-left), 7.34 hr found by K. Meech et al.9 (top-right), 8.10 hr found by B. Bolin et al.13 and M. Bannister et al.14 (bottom-left), and D. Jewitt et al.10 (bottom-right). None of these four periodicity solutions phase our data, showing that 1I/'Oumuamua does not have a unique rotation period, as expected from tumbling motion. 16 Figure S1. Demonstration of our background cleaning algorithm. Top: example of an original image, corrected only for overscan, bias, and flatfield. Bottom: clean version of the image above, with stars and galaxies accurately removed. 17 Figure S2. Flux ratio versus axial ratio for aspect angle θ from 90° to 30°. For each angle two different trajectories are presented, one for minimum and one for maximum flux ratios over a series of polar angles φ for a given aspect angle θ. Supplementary References 39. Masiero, J. Palomar Optical Spectrum of Hyperbolic Near-Earth Object A/2017 U1. (2017). 40. Helfenstein, P. & Veverka, J. Physical characterization of asteroid surfaces from photometric analysis. in 557–593 (1989). 41. Królikowska, M. Warsaw Catalogue of cometary orbits: 119 near-parabolic comets. Astron. Astrophys. 567, A126 (2014). 18
1612.08635	2	1612	2017-01-07T08:27:03	Collisional parameters of planetesimal belts, precursor of debris disks, perturbed by a nearby giant planet	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Planetesimal belts are invoked to explain the prolonged existence of debris disks. Important parameters to model their collisional evolution and to compute the dust production rate are the intrinsic probability of collision $P_i$ and the mean impact velocity $U_c$. If a planet orbits close to the belt, the values of both these parameters are affected by its secular perturbations yielding a strong correlation between eccentricity $e$ and pericentre longitude $\varpi$. We adopt a new algorithm to compute both $P_i$ and $U_c$ in presence of various levels of secular correlation due to different ratios between proper and forced eccentricity. We tested this algorithm in a standard case with a Jupiter--sized planet orbiting inside a putative planetesimal belt finding that it is less collisionally active compared to a self--stirred belt because of the $e - \varpi$ coupling. The eccentricity of the planet is an important parameter in determining the amount of dust production since the erosion rate is 10 times faster when the planet eccentricity increases from 0.1 to 0.6. Also the initial conditions of the belt (either warm or cold) and its average inclination strongly affects $P_i$ and $U_c$ and then its long term collisional evolution in presence of the planet. We finally apply our method to the planetesimal belts supposedly refilling the dust disks around HD 38529 and $\epsilon$ Eridani. In the most collisionally active configurations, only a small fraction of bodies smaller than 100 km are expected to be fragmented over a time--span of 4 Gyr.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 -- 17 (.....) Printed 14 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Collisional parameters of planetesimal belts, precursor of debris disks, perturbed by a nearby giant planet. F. Marzari1 and A. Dell'Oro2 1Dept. of Physics, University of Padova, 35131 Italy 2INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, I-50125, Firenze, Italy Accepted .....; Received ..... ; in original form ........ ABSTRACT Planetesimal belts are invoked to explain the prolonged existence of debris disks. Important parameters to model their collisional evolution and to compute the dust production rate are the intrinsic probability of collision Pi and the mean impact ve- locity Uc. If a planet orbits close to the belt, the values of both these parameters are affected by its secular perturbations yielding a strong correlation between eccentricity e and pericentre longitude . We adopt a new algorithm to compute both Pi and Uc in presence of various levels of secular correlation due to different ratios between proper and forced eccentricity. We tested this algorithm in a standard case with a Jupiter -- sized planet orbiting inside a putative planetesimal belt finding that it is less collisionally active compared to a self -- stirred belt because of the e − coupling. The eccentricity of the planet is an important parameter in determining the amount of dust production since the erosion rate is 10 times faster when the planet eccentricity increases from 0.1 to 0.6. Also the initial conditions of the belt (either warm or cold) and its average inclination strongly affects Pi and Uc and then its long term collisional evolution in presence of the planet. We finally apply our method to the planetesimal belts supposedly refilling the dust disks around HD 38529 and ǫ Eridani. In the most collisionally active configurations, only a small fraction of bodies smaller than 100 km are expected to be fragmented over a time -- span of 4 Gyr. Key words: planetary systems; planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and sta- bility 1 INTRODUCTION Debris disks, mostly detected in thermal infrared, are ob- served around 10 -- 20% of solar type stars (Hillenbrand et al. 2008; Trilling et al. 2008; Sibthorpe et al. 2013). The micron -- sized grains populating these disks are short lived mostly because of radiation related forces and collisional ero- sion. As a consequence, their refilling requires the presence of a reservoir of planetesimals whose collisions constantly produce new dusty debris. Indeed debris disks are the only signature of these belts whose properties like size distribu- tion, mechanical strength and dynamical excitation cannot be constrained by observations. The only way to link plan- etesimals and dust is through numerical models reproducing the SED and resolved images of debris disks. However, these models not always give unique solutions. Analogues of the solar system asteroid or Kuiper belt, planetesimal belts are leftovers from the planet forma- tion process and they eventually continue to evolve un- der mutual collisions. The frequency of debris disks as well as the infrared excess strength decline with the stel- lar age (Krivov 2010) suggesting that the collisional pro- cess slowly grinds down the initial planetesimal population. Different mechanisms have been invoked to stir up a plan- etesimal swarm igniting mutual destructive collisions like self -- stirring by larger planetesimals (Chambers & Wetherill 2001; Kenyon & Bromley 2004) and perturbations by plan- ets (Mustill & Wyatt 2009). Concerning this last mecha- nism, it is still controversial from an observational point of view if there is any significant correlation between stars with dust emission and the presence of known planets (Bryden et al. 2009; Moro-Mart´ın et al. 2007a) even if some of such systems are already known like that in ǫ Eridani (Benedict et al. 2006a), Fomalhaut (Kalas et al. 2008) and HD 38529 (Moro-Mart´ın et al. 2007b). From a theoretical point of view, it is expected that debris disks and plan- ets coexist in a large number of systems being both the outcome of dust coagulation and planetesimal accumulation even if debris disks appear to be more common than mas- sive planets (Moro-Mart´ın et al. 2007a). This may be due to 2 the presence of debris disks even in systems where the plan- etesimals were not able to form the core of giant planets. In this scenario, the dust would be produced in mutual colli- sions possibly triggered by self -- stirring. There are significant observational problems in statistically assessing the proba- bility of finding giant planets and debris disks coexisting in the same system. Young stars have a higher percentage of debris disks but radial velocity surveys for planets around them are difficult because of the noise due to stellar activity. On the other hand, planets can be easily detected around old stars where debris disks may have been eroded away by collisional evolution and are expected to be less common. It is also difficult to precisely locate the debris belts in radial distance in order to asses the potential detectability of close- by planets. Finally, it should be noted that the inventory of giant exoplanets is still poor for semimajor axes larger than a few AU. Assuming that in some systems different dynamical mechanisms lead to a configuration with a massive planet in an inside orbit respect to a debris disk, this would be a particularly interesting architecture since the disk struc- ture is very sensitive to the planet gravitational perturba- tions potentially driving the formation of arcs, gaps, warps and asymmetric clumps in the disk (Moro-Mart´ın et al. 2005, 2007b). Even the gap between two components debris disks is suspected to be carved by intervening planets scat- tering away the remnant planetesimals (Su & Rieke 2014; Shannon et al. 2016) and a survey based on direct imag- ing is searching for planets in systems with double debris disks (Meshkat et al. 2015). In addition to these direct ef- fects, a planet also perturbs the planetesimal belt stirring up their orbits and affecting the collision probability and impact velocity (Mustill & Wyatt 2009). The level of stir- ring depends on the planet mass, vicinity to the belt, either inside or outside, and orbital eccentricity. An excited plan- etesimal belt may give origin to a brighter debris disk at start (Wyatt et al. 2007), but its lifetime will be significantly shorter due to the collisional erosion. We can envisage different scenarios related to the co- existence of planets and debris disks. A single giant planet, which had a limited amount of inward migration, can clear part of the leftover planetesimal population leaving an inner cavity in the planetesimal disk. In this case we would find a low eccentricity planet secularly perturbing an external planetesimal belt. This configuration does not exclude the presence of additional planets in the system moving in inside orbits. More complex dynamical configurations are expected when a multi -- planet system undergoes a period of extended chaotic evolution characterised by planet -- planet scattering. In extreme cases this dynamical evolution may lead to a complete clearing of local planetesimal belts because of the intense perturbations of the planets on highly eccentric or- bits (Bonsor et al. 2013; Marzari 2014). However, less vio- lent evolutions may lead to a final architecture where a giant planet on an eccentric orbit is located inside, or outside, the surviving belt and it affects its evolution via secular pertur- bations. The two different mechanisms may lead to a wide range of possible eccentricities for the planet perturbing the belt. When a planetesimal belt is accompanied by a close- by planet, the relative impact velocity and frequency of collisions of the perturbed belt, used to predict its long term collisional evolution, cannot be calculated with the Opik/Wetherill analytic formulation (Opik 1951; Wetherill 1967) even in the improved formulations developed to study the evolution of the asteroid belt (see Davis et al. (2002) for a review). In presence of a massive planet, in particular if on a highly eccentric orbit, the forced component in the secular evolution of the planetesimal orbits may lead to a strong correlation between eccentricity and perihelion longi- tude. This correlation invalidates the Opik/Wetherill meth- ods based on a uniform distribution of the orbital angles (perihelion longitude and node longitude) derived under the assumption of periodic circulation of the two angles. These methods work properly when describing the evolution of the asteroid or Kuiper belt in the solar system where the forced eccentricity is significantly smaller than the proper one, but in dynamical configurations where the planetesimal ring is perturbed by a giant planet on a highly eccentric orbit they fail. A first attempt to overcome this problem is described in Mustill & Wyatt (2009) where they first derive refined val- ues of the forced eccentricity from which they compute an average value of the impact velocity between the planetes- imals multiplying the forced eccentricity by the local Kep- lerian velocity and a constant value c ∼ 1.4. In this paper we apply an innovative semi-analytic method to estimate both the intrinsic probability of collision Pi i.e. the collision rate per unit cross -- section area of target and projectile per unit time, and the average collision speed Uc, derived from a detailed statistical frequency distribution of the relative velocities, in a planetesimal belt perturbed by an eccentric giant planet. This method is designed in order to fully ac- count for the different levels of correlation between eccentric- ity and perihelion longitude of the planetesimals caused by the secular dynamics. Both Pi and Uc are needed to prop- erly model the collisional evolution of a planetesimal disk and predict the dust production rate refilling the related de- bris disk. In particular, Pi is more relevant in establishing the amount of erosion of the belt. We consider two distinct plausible scenarios where, prior to the evolution of the per- turbing planet close to the belt, the planetesimal disk was either dynamically non -- excited (cold population) or excited (warm population). In the former case (cold population), when the planet approaches the belt during its evolution, the proper eccentricity of the planetesimals is immediately excited to a value approximately equal to the secular forced one (Th´ebault et al. 2006). This is also the scenario explored by Mustill & Wyatt (2009) and it is the dynamical configu- ration where the correlation between e and is maximised. If instead the eccentricities of the planetesimal population were already significantly excited when the planet sets in and begins to perturb the belt (warm belt) a different dynam- ical configuration is achieved where the proper and forced eccentricities may significantly differ. We will consider cases where the eccentricity, prior to the onset of the secular per- turbations, is an increasing fraction of the forced eccentric- ity. In these cases after the onset of the secular perturbations the degree of correlation between e and will be less robust within the belt and pseudo -- librator states will appear in the population influencing the values of both Pi and Uc. While modelling a warm belt, it is reasonable to expect that also the inclination is excited as well so we will explore the ef- fect of a high planetesimal inclination on both the collisional parameters. If a belt is densely populated by planetesimals, a sig- nificant collisional damping of the eccentricity may occur (Stewart & Wetherill 1988) leading it to a state of cold belt before the planet approaches. After the planet sets into a perturbing orbit, the collisional damping may still be effi- cient in reducing the eccentricity, but in this case it will affect only the proper term causing its progressive decrease. We explore also this scenario and estimate the values of the collisional parameters to compare with non -- damped cold and warm belts. In Section 2 we briefly summarise the expected dynam- ical behaviour of a planetesimal belt perturbed by a planet. In Section 3 we outline the method developed to compute the average values of intrinsic probability of collision Pi and impact velocity Uc for a belt characterised by the above men- tioned secular dynamics. In Section 4 we apply the method to a 'standard' case to illustrate the effects of the secular dy- namics and compare the predicted values of Uc with those derived by Mustill & Wyatt (2009). We also derive and com- pare the values of the collisional parameters in cold and warm belts with and without inclination excitation. In Sec- tion 5 we model the collisional evolution of a putative belt with the previously estimated collisional parameters while in Section 6 we model a real system, HD 38529, and com- pare its evolution with that of ǫ Eridani. Finally, in Section 7 we summarise and discuss our results. 2 SECULAR EVOLUTION AND CORRELATION BETWEEN ECCENTRICITY AND PERIHELION LONGITUDE The dynamical evolution of a minor body population per- turbed by a planet is classically described by the linear secu- lar theory of Laplace -- Lagrange (Murray & Dermott 1999). For a mass -- less planetesimal population, the evolution with time of the non -- singular variables h = e sin ω and k = e cos ω, where e and ω are the eccentricity and longitude of the pericentre of the osculating orbit, respectively, is given by h = epsin(At + B) + ef k = epcos(At + B) (1) where B is a constant determined by the initial condi- tions of the system, ep is termed proper eccentricity while ef is the forced one. In our case we consider the simpli- fied situation in which the planet is not perturbed by ad- ditional bodies so that ef is constant. In Eq. 1 we assume that the reference frame for the computation of the orbital elements is aligned with the apsidal line of the planet or- bit. Approximate values for the proper frequency A and the forced eccentricity ef can be derived from the simplified lin- ear disturbing function (Murray & Dermott 1999) and are given in Mustill & Wyatt (2009) Collisional parameters of planetesimal belts 3 ef ∼ 5 4 A ∼ n αepl 3 4 mpl ms α2 ¯α (2) where ms is the mass of the central body (the star), epl the eccentricity of the planet and n is the mean motion of the test body. For a configuration in which the planet is interior to the planetesimal orbit α = apl a and ¯α = 1 while α = a and ¯α = α for an exterior planet. a is the semimajor apl axis of the planetesimal and apl the semimajor axis of the planet (Murray & Dermott 1999; Mustill & Wyatt 2009). This classical perturbation theory works far from mean mo- tion and secular resonances and, as a consequence, some values of α lead to incorrect predictions. In addition, the theory has been developed to second order in the eccentric- ity and inclination of the bodies and it is a good approx- imation only for small values of these orbital parameters. Among known extrasolar planets, a significant fraction have high orbital eccentricities for which either semi -- numerical approaches (Michtchenko & Malhotra 2004) or higher or- der theories (Libert & Henrard 2005) are preferable. How- ever, a numerical exploration of the reliability of the for- mulas of the linear theory even for large values of epl by Mustill & Wyatt (2009) has shown that the precession rate can be well described by the disturbing function developed by Heppenheimer (1978) for binary stars: A ∼ 2πn 3 4 mpl ms α2 ¯α 4(1 − e2 pl)3/2 (3) for values of epl beyond 0.2 even if the correction proposed by Th´ebault et al. (2006) was not tested. This last is a more accurate prescription for the frequency of the secular os- cillations induced by a binary companion empirically de- rived from several numerical simulations. In our context, a very precise value of the frequency A is not strictly required since what matters is that the randomisation of the angles is achieved. A constant frequency of circulation is the only assumption about θ = At + B used in our statistical model. The forced eccentricity ef is instead well approximated by the linear secular theory even for large values of epl. To test the reliability of the linear secular theory in dealing with the main dynamical features of a planetesimal belt perturbed by an eccentric planet, we have compared the outcome of a short term numerical simulation with the pre- dictions of the theory. In Fig.1 we show the evolution with time of a population of planetesimals orbiting between 15 and 20 AU on initially circular orbits and perturbed by a planet at 5 AU with an eccentricity epl = 0.5. The 15th order RADAU integrator (Everhart 1985) has been used for this short term simulation. In the upper panel we show the h and k variables after about 10 Myr of evolution. The pericentre longitude is randomised since the period of the secular cir- culation is lower than 1 Myr and the integration time -- span is also significantly longer than the 'crossing time' defined in Mustill & Wyatt (2009) for an internal perturber. This time is given by: 4 tcross ∼ 1.53 × 103 (1 − e2 epl M⊙(cid:19)−1 ×(cid:18) mpl (cid:18) M∗ M⊙(cid:19) 1 2 yr, (4) pl)3/2 2 × 9 (cid:16) a 10AU (cid:17) ×(cid:16) apl 1AU(cid:17)−3 and, for our test belt, the longest tcross is about 3.6 × 105 yr. The theoretical evolution for e and predicted by the linear secular theory can be derived combining the two vec- tors drawn in the plot representing the forced ef and proper ep eccentricities. In the bottom panel the planetesimal ec- centricity is shown as a function of the perihelion longi- tude and compared to the theoretical curve. The ana- lytic curves are computed for a single value of semimajor axis and, as a consequence, they only match the evolution of the planetesimals with initial semimajor axis similar to that used in the computation of the curves. The agreement between the linear theory and the numerical results is really good apart from a few scattered points which are due to the effects of mean motion resonances with the planet and can be neglected. In the figures, we have assumed that ep ∼ ef , condi- tion which is based on the premise that, before being per- turbed by the planet, the planetesimals were initially on unperturbed almost circular orbits with ep0 ∼ 0. The ap- proximation ep ∼ ef is common when exploring the pertur- bations of a massive body on an initially cold planetesimal belt (Heppenheimer 1978; Whitmire et al. 1998). In partic- ular, if the planet is injected on a highly eccentric orbit after a period of dynamical instability, the belt of planetesimals will suddenly feel the strong secular perturbations of the planet. If we assume that as 'time 0' of the secular pertur- bations the belt was cold with ep0 ∼ 0, then the condition ep ∼ ef is naturally imposed in the subsequent evolution. We term here ep0 the proper eccentricity before the onset of the planet perturbations. In this case it would not be correct to call it a 'proper' eccentricity since it is just the average eccentricity of the cold belt. However, since it will determine the subsequent value of the proper eccentricity once the planet begins to perturb the belt, hereinafter we will use ep0 to indicate it. A scenario different from that of an initial cold belt is produced by a belt which has been excited before the arrival of the perturbing planet, a warm belt. Various mechanisms may contribute to the dynamical excitation like stellar flybys, self -- stirring and planet stirring related to an extended period of planet -- planet scattering (see Matthews et al. (2014) for a review). This last mechanism, due to its large variety of possible outcomes, may activate the planetesimal belt inducing high eccentricities and incli- nations before a planet is deposited on a finally stable orbit close to the belt (Bonsor et al. 2013; Marzari 2014). In a warm belt the initial planetesimal eccentricity ep0 is signifi- cantly higher than 0 at the time of the planet approach. The secular modelling of an initially warm belt is more complex respect to that of a cold belt since in the former case the initial conditions for the secular evolution are different from the simple assumption ep ∼ ef . In Fig.2 we show how the new proper eccentricity ep of each planetesimal in the belt, after the planet perturbations are switched on, can be com- h y t i c i r t n e c c E 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 ep θ ef -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 k 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Per. Long. (deg) Figure 1. Secular evolution of a population of planetesimals mov- ing in a ring with semimajor axis ranging from 15 to 20 AU and initially circular orbits. They are perturbed by a Jupiter -- size planet with apl = 5 AU and eccentricity epl = 0.5. In the top panel the evolution of the non -- singular h and k variables is illustrated (h = e cos(), k = e sin()). The arrows show the forced ef and proper ep eccentricities for a = 15 AU (in blue) and a = 20 AU (in black), which, once combined, give the eccentricity of the planetesimals. The blue and black dashed lines show the curves obtained by combining proper and forced eccentricity. On the bottom panel the correlation between and e is highlighted. puted from ep0 (initial average eccentricity of the belt before the approach of the planet) and how the secular theory can be used to predict the subsequent dynamical evolution. In the upper panel of Fig.2 we sketch the mode of operation of the secular theory using vector formalism. The blue circle marks the location of the tips of all the initial proper ec- centricity vectors ep0's of the warm belt. All these vectors have the same modulus (we assume that all planetesimals have the same initial ep0 equal to the average of the belt) while their orientation is random depending on . When the planet begins to perturb the belt, a common forced ec- centricity vector ef appears in the secular evolution. As a consequence, each body will acquire a new proper eccen- tricity vector ep which depends on the the initial proper eccentricity vector ep0 through the relation ef + ep = ep0. The new proper eccentricity vector ep = ep0 − ef will mark the secular evolution of each planetesimal from then on. The modulus of the new ep ranges from ef − ep0 and ef + ep0 with all intermediate values being possible, if the belt is h e ep e f e ep0 ep ep0 k 0.6 0.4 h 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.2 0 k 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 e 0 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 w (deg) Figure 2. In the upper panel the secular dynamics is sketched. The blue circle describes the location of the tip of the proper eccentricity vector ep0 in an unperturbed warm belt. When the planet perturbs the belt, new initial proper vectors ep are com- puted joining the tip of ef with the tip of ep0. Once the initial eps are computed in this way, the secular evolution can be pre- dicted following the circle centred on the tip of ef and depicted by the tip of ep. In the middle and lower panels the secular be- haviour is compared to the outcome of numerical integrations. We select 5 orbits with semimajor axis equal to 15 AU, initial values ep0 = 0.5 · ef and 5 different values of the initial pericentre longitude 0o, 45o, 90o, 135o, and 180o. The analytic predictions are given by the dashed continuous lines and they match closely the numerical results drawn by different colours depending on the initial value of . In both panels, for small values of ep, pseudo -- librations around 0o are observed (red and green points). Collisional parameters of planetesimal belts 5 enough crowded. The ep's will be used, together with ef , to compute the subsequent secular evolution featured by circles centred on the tip of ef and with radius equal to ep. In the middle and lower panels of Fig.2 we compare the analytic predictions of the secular theory with numerical integration of five different planetesimal orbits. They are all started with semimajor axis a = 15 AU and all have the same value of initial eccentricity ep0 = 0.5 · ef . The pericentre longitude is set to 0o, 45o, 90o, 135o, and 180o, respectively. In this way we cover the most relevant secular behaviours typical of an initially warm belt perturbed by a planet. For small values of ep a pseudo -- libration around 0o is observed while for larger values circulation is restored. In all cases there is a significant correlation between eccentricity and pericentre longitude. In modelling warm belts we will sample three different initial ratios between ep0 and ef i.e. 0.25, 0.5, and 1. Link- ing ep0 to ef is an arbitrary choice but it is adopted to give an idea of how higher initial values of ep0 influence both Pi and Uc and it appears more robust than selecting random values of ep0. It is less arbitrary, it can be easily replicated and, in addition, it includes a radial dependence which may be present in the initial belt. At present we do not have the means to reconstruct the past history of a warm belt and of the dynamical mechanisms which may have stirred it (planet formation, protoplanets roaming around, a phase of planet-planet scattering etc...) and, as a consequence, many different initial distributions of the planetesimal proper ec- centricities are conceivable. We focus in this paper on those where the proper eccentricity does not exceed the forced one and decreases with radial distance. For warm belts we will explore a scenario where the dynamical excitation involves also the inclination modelling, together with the case with i = 3o, one with i = 15o. If the planetesimal belt is densely populated, a strong collisional damping may occur even after the planet reached its close-by orbit. This damping is due to the loss of orbital energy after each collision and, on average, it causes a reduc- tion of the proper eccentricity ep. Any crowded belt might be drag to a condition similar to that illustrated in Fig. 3 even in presence of a perturbing planet. The proper eccen- tricity is smaller than the forced one and all planetesimals evolve in pseudo -- librating orbits with a degree of alignment which depends on the ratio between proper and forced ec- centricity. We will model also this dynamical configuration and compute values of Pi and Uc in this scenario. We have to point out that our estimates of Pi and Uc cannot be applied to very young belts, since our model re- quires a full randomisation of the pericentre of the planetesi- mals. This occurs on a timescale of some tens of Myrs when the perturber is a Jovian -- type planet limiting the appli- cability of our computations to older disks. From Eq. (3) we can deduce that smaller size planets need more time to randomise the pericentre since the secular period is in- versely proportional to the planet mass mpl. For example, a Neptune -- size planet would lead to pericentre randomisation on a timescale approximately 20 times longer i.e. about half of a Gyr. Our estimates of Pi and Uc will be valid only after that time. 6 Figure 3. If the planetesimal belt is densely populated, a signif- icant collisional damping may occur reducing the proper eccen- tricity even after the planet ignited its secular perturbations. In this case the secular evolution will lead to pseudo -- librations of the pericentre of all bodies and the secular evolution is described by the dashed circle. 3 THE METHOD An essential prerequisite to model the collisional evolution of a population of minor bodies, like planetesimals, is a quantitative estimate of two parameters: the average im- pact velocity Uc and the intrinsic probability of collision Pi. The impact velocity appears in all basic steps determin- ing the outcome of a collision and it discriminates between accumulation, cratering or shattering events. Together with semi-empirical scaling laws describing the strength of a body suffering a collision, Uc determines the mass of the largest remnant body and the size distribution of the escaping frag- ments. The intrinsic probability of collision Pi is related to the frequency of collisions between the bodies of the given population. It is a property related to the orbital distribution and defined independently from the number or size distribu- tion of the bodies populating the belt. For example, for two given orbits, Pi is defined as the mean number per year of close encounters with minimum distance less than 1 km oc- curring between two points moving along the two orbits. If two bodies with radius RT ("target") and Rp ("projectile") move along the above mentioned orbits, the mean number of collisions per unit of time is Pi(RT + Rp)2. In wider terms, if the orbit of a target body with radius RT moves within a swarm of Np projectiles with radius Rp, and Pi,k is the in- trinsic probability of collision between the target orbit and the orbit of the k-th projectile, the mean number of collisions per unit of time suffered by the target is Pk Pi,k(RT +Rp)2, or: dn dt = hPii(RT + Rp)2Np (5) where hPii = (Pk Pi,k)/Np is the mean intrinsic probability of collision (Farinella & Davis 1992; Davis et al. 2002). In this paper we will treat only cases of targets impacted by populations of projectiles, so hereinafter we use the symbol Pi always with the meaning of mean intrinsic probability of collision. It has been computed for different populations of minor bodies in the solar system and, for instance, its mean value for the asteroid belts is Pi ∼ 2.9 × 10−18 km−2 yr−1 (Bottke et al. 2002). The important aspect of Pi is that it is not simply a particle -- in -- a -- box model where the bodies move freely between collisions, but it accounts for the Keplerian dynamics of the bodies even when they are on perturbed orbits. In the case of planetesimal belts perturbed by a planet in a close-by orbit, the classical Opik/Wetherill approach for the computation of Pi and Uc cannot be used if the forced eccentricity is not significantly smaller than the proper ec- centricity. The Opik/Wetherill statistics, hereinafter termed "canonical" statistics, is based on the following assumptions: (1) the semimajor axes a, eccentricities e and inclinations I of the osculating orbits are fixed; (2) the rate of variation of the node longitudes Ω and peri- centre arguments ω of the osculating orbits are constant. In other words, the osculating orbits circulate uniformly; (3) the motion of the planetesimals along their osculating orbits is fully described by the second Kepler's law; 1998); Dell'Oro et al. The first attempt to overcome the assumptions of the canonical statistics has been done by Dell'Oro & Paolicchi (1997, particular (1998) developed a mathematical Dell'Oro & Paolicchi formalism for the study of the statistics of collisions among asteroids provided that the following more general assumptions are fulfilled: (1998). In (1) the orbital parameters a, e and I of the osculating orbits are fixed (4) none of the osculating elements a, e and I is correlated with one of the angular elements Ω, ω or mean anomaly M Indeed, thanks to its numerical implementation, the method of Dell'Oro & Paolicchi (1998) can be used even if condition (1) is not fulfilled by simply substituting the ensemble of fixed values of a, e and I with a ficti- tious list of "child" elements a, e and I whose distribu- tions fit ad-hoc parent distributions. So, in general, in all cases where condition (4) is fulfilled, the method proposed by Dell'Oro & Paolicchi (1998) can be employed. Unfortu- nately, the dynamical behaviour of a planetesimal belt per- turbed by a planet strongly violates condition (4) because of the strong correlation between eccentricity and perihelion longitude, entailing a correlation among e, Ω and ω. To ac- count for this correlation, we envisioned a different technique described here below. Our new algorithm adopts a Monte Carlo approach con- sisting in a random exploration of the phase space of posi- tions and velocities of the bodies in order to derive their rate of collision and impact velocity distribution. It can be summarised in four consecutive steps. In the first step, a numerical model of the disk is pre- pared by generating a list of bodies with semimajor axis randomly and uniformly chosen in an interval [amin, amax]. Different radial distributions can be implemented, but in this paper we adopt this simple assumption which implies a decrease of the planetesimal superficial density as r−1. The forced eccentricity for each body is computed from Eq. 2 (Mustill & Wyatt 2009) while the inclination I is ran- domly generated from a uniform distribution in the inter- val [0, Imax]. Finally, a value of proper eccentricity ep is computed for all bodies which is derived from the initial assumed value of proper eccentricity ep0 of each planetes- imal in the belt before it is perturbed. In all our models, the average number of bodies (orbits) used in the Monte Carlo statistics is of the order of 10, 000. Our final goal is to compute the statistical parameters Pi and Uc for collisions occurring between all bodies belonging to our list, consid- ered representative of the structure of the disk, and some selected target bodies (tracers) whose orbits have inclina- tion IT = Imax/2, semimajor axes aT chosen at fixed steps between [amin, amax], and values of ep, ef computed with the same rules for the disk bodies. In this way, Pi and Uc are functions of the semimajor axis of the target only and can be evaluated at different locations on the disk. In the case of a warm belt, since the tracers may have different values of ep, 1000 tracers are used for each semimajor axis and the values of Pi and Uc are computed as average over all of them. The second step consists of a random sampling of the mean anomaly M and of the secular angle θ, the angle be- tween the vectors describing the proper and forced eccentric- ity, respectively (see Fig. 1). Both samplings are performed assuming a uniform distribution of the angles since we know from the secular theory that θ precesses at a regular pace, at least as a first approximation, while the mean anomaly M circulates with the constant frequency n. From the val- ues of ef , ep and θ we can derive the osculating eccentricity completing the set of orbital elements. From the long list of orbital elements sampled for each body of the disk and tracers we can compute the list of positions and velocities (rt, vt, rp, vp) of projectiles and targets. This two-steps sam- pling allows to reproduce in the phase space, described by positions and velocities, the distribution of the orbital ele- ments of projectiles and targets imposed by the secular per- turbations of the planet. This distribution is characterised by different levels of correlation between e and ω which de- pend on the initial choice of ep0. At this point we have a model disk reflecting the secular dynamics in Cartesian co- ordinates. The third step consists in computing, from the distri- bution of the positions and velocities of both projectiles and targets, the rate of close approaches and the distribution of impact velocities. For each target the number ν(R) of close encounters within a given distance R per unit time is, by definition, the ratio: ν(R) = N (R, T ) T (6) where N (R, T ) is the number of close encounters occurred during an interval of time T and within a distance R. It is noteworthy that, in the context of the above equation, R is the distance between the centres of the two bodies during the approach and it is not the radius of either of the two bodies. Assuming a general dynamical stability of the system and choosing T long enough, the number ν(R) no longer depends either on the initial conditions of the system or on the value of T . We can rewrite this ratio as: ν(R) = N (R, T ) S(R, T ) S(R, T ) T (7) Collisional parameters of planetesimal belts 7 where S(R, T ) is the sum of the durations of all close en- counters occurred during the interval of time T and within the distance R. The ratio: τ (R) = S(R, T ) N (R, T ) (8) is the mean value of the durations of the close encounters within a distance R, while: p(R) = S(R, T ) T (9) is the probability to find a projectile within a distance R from the target at a randomly chosen instant of time. The mean close encounter duration τ (R) is related to the prop- erties of the relative motion between projectile and target. Assuming that the relative trajectory of the bodies can be approximated as a rectilinear motion with constant veloc- ity v = vt − vp, the average (expected) duration of a close encounter is (4/3)(R/v), taking into account that the projec- tile can pass anywhere inside the sphere of radius R around the target. This rectilinear motion approximation is valid only for values of the close approach distance R significantly smaller than the size of the orbits of the planetesimals. The probability p(R) is directly derived from the (rt, vt, rp, vp) list by computing the ratio between the number of samples for which rt − rp < R and the total number of samples. In this way the rate of the close encounters can be expressed in terms of the sampled quantities as: ν(R) = 3 4 1 N R Xk vk (10) where vk is the relative velocity of the k-th sample of target- projectile pairs. The sum includes only those cases for which rt − rp < R while N is the total number of samples (Dell'Oro 2016). The rate ν(R) is derived as a function of the close ap- proach distance R. By definition of intrinsic probability of collision, Pi = ν(R) if R = 1 km. On the other hand, due to the numerical limitations of the Monte Carlo approach, it is not possible to evaluate the rate ν(R) directly for R = 1 km, since it requires an excessive computational effort. Neverthe- less, for values of R small compared to the linear dimensions of the orbits, the rate ν is expected to be proportional to the geometric cross section, that is ν(R) ∝ R2 (the effect of the gravitational focusing is negligible due to the small sizes of the planetesimals). For all the cases investigated in this work we have verified that ν(R) is really proportional to R2 when R is small enough. For this reason, we extrapolate the function ν(R) down to R = 1 km by assuming that the R2 trend is maintained. In short, within the interval of values of R for which ν(R) results to be proportional to R2, the ratio ν(R)/R2 provides the value of Pi directly. Together with Pi, we also compute the mean v(R) of the relative velocity for all close encounters with rt − rp < R. The parameter v(R) is correctly evaluated on the basis of the (rt, vt, rp, vp) list as: where again vk is the relative velocity of the k-th target- (11) k v(R) = Pk v2 Pk vk 8 projectile pair and the sum includes only those cases for which rt − rp < R. From Eq. 10 it can be deduced that each of the target-projectile pairs contributes to the final evaluation of the frequency ν(R) with a term vk/R. This comes from the fact that each orbital geometry has its own probability to occur, as outlined by Bottke et al. (1994). In other words, each value of the relative velocity vk of the planetesimal ensemble has to be weighted by vk itself in order to obtain the correct probability distribution of the relative velocities. The same holds true for any other pa- rameter related to close encounters. But unlike ν(R), the value of v(R) is expected to tend asymptotically to a finite value for R smaller and smaller. This limit is the mean value Uc of the impact velocity. In general, for the cases under in- vestigation in this work, we have verified that the function v(R) decreases for lower R and it becomes constant from a certain value onward, providing our estimation of Uc. The procedure described above leads to an accurate es- timate of both Pi and Uc (Dell'Oro 2016). The algorithm has been extensively validated on different sets of test cases and, in particular, it provides values of Pi and Uc for Main Belt asteroids and Kuiper belt objects which are in agreement with those previously reported in literature. The direct source of uncertainty in the computation of Pi and Uc is due to the casual fluctuations in the random sampling of the phase space, depending on the total number of samples (and so the total duration of the computation). Another, but indirect, error is introduced by the fluctuations in the construction of the ring model. The list of planetesi- mal orbits is generated randomly and not all the particles in the ring intersect the orbit of the target, but only a fraction of them within a more or less wide range of semimajor axes. This means that, depending of the details of the random generation of the orbits, the number of bodies intersecting the orbit of the target can change a little, impacting on the evaluation of Pi and Uc. The total number of random sam- ples has been tuned in order to constrain the uncertainties within few percents of Pi and Uc. 4 THE "STANDARD" CASE As a first test, we apply our algorithm to compute the intrinsic probability of collision and average impact ve- locity to a "standard" case similar to that explored by Mustill & Wyatt (2009). In this model, a planetesimal belt extends from 10 to 20 AU and it is perturbed by a Jupiter -- sized planet with mass mp = 0.001 m⊙ on an orbit with semimajor axis apl = 5 AU while the eccentricity can be either epl = 0.1 or epl = 0.6. We consider two distinct con- figurations: a cold belt that, before the arrival of the planet in a perturbing orbit, had a very low proper eccentricity (ep0 ∼ 0). In this case, when the planet turns on its secular perturbations, the value of ep becomes approximately equal to ef (see Fig.1). We also explore the evolution of warm belts that, prior to the planet arrival, had already a high value of proper eccentricity ep0, possibly excited by other mechanisms like an extended period of planet -- planet scat- tering or the formation of large embryos. In this scenario we assume that ep0 is a significant fraction of ef and we test three cases, one with ep0 = 0.25 · ef , one with ep0 = 0.5 · ef and one, the most excited, with ep0 = ef . This is just an arbitrary choice to show the effects of an initial value of ep0 > 0 and it is not dictated by any particular scenario. It appears a better choice than a random selection of ep0 val- ues. As soon as the planet begins to perturb the warm belt, the eccentricity values will be encompassed between ef − ep and ef + ep where ep is derived from the initial value of ep0 as described in Sect. 2 (see Fig.2). 4.1 Initially cold belt In an initial cold belt the correlation between e and that the planet establishes when approaching the belt is the strongest due to the assumption that ep0 = 0. The secular dynamics is well described by the plots of Fig.1. Both Pi and Uc are shown in Fig. 4 as a function of the semimajor axis of the tracers which well approximate the average radial dis- tance from the star of each body. In this figure we illustrate the case with epl = 0.1, a configuration in which the plan- etesimal belt is less perturbed (compared to epl = 0.6). The green full squares are the impact velocity values computed assuming there is no secular correlation between the eccen- tricity and perihelion longitude (hereinafter the 'canonical' case) while the empty red squares show the probability and velocity values when the secular correlation is taken into account. The dotted line in the lower panel of Fig. 4 gives the average relative velocity computed as Uc = 1.4ef vkep where vkep is the local Keplerian velocity (Mustill & Wyatt 2009). This relation leads to a simple r−3/2 scaling of the velocity with the radial distance r. The correlation between eccentricity and perihelion longitude reduces both Pi and, in particular, the relative impact velocity Uc respect to the case without secular correlation. This is due to two effects which are manifest in Fig. 1: there is a consistent fraction of orbits with very low eccentricity while the high eccentric or- bits have their pericentres almost aligned around 0o leading to low velocity impacts. The analytic prediction of Mustill & Wyatt (2009) for Uc appears to slightly overestimate the impact speed at 10 AU by about 10% and underestimate it at 20 AU by approx- imately the same amount. The r−3/2 scaling does not appear to fully account for the dynamical evolution of the belt pos- sibly because it does not properly account for the spatial distribution of the encounters radial locations related to the secular dynamics. For Pi, it is difficult to derive a proper scaling with the radial distance since two different effects come into play in determining Pi as a function of r. On one side there is a pure dynamical dependence of the probability of collision of a planetesimal pair on r related to their or- bital elements. A typical equation giving such a probability can be found in Wetherill (1967) (eq. 20). However, we are computing the Pi not of a single pair, but for an entire pop- ulation of planetesimals and their radial distribution comes strongly into play. This radial distribution does not only de- pend on the planetesimal superficial density distribution but it is significantly influenced by the distribution of all orbital elements of the population. As a consequence, it cannot be predicted a priori with an easy power law distribution, in particular for highly eccentric belts. Close to the inner edge of the belt, the value of Pi de- creases due to the inner truncation of the belt and to a re- duction in the number of crossing orbits. This effect will dis- appear for higher eccentricities since the perihelion -- aphelion Collisional parameters of planetesimal belts 9 3.0 2.0 1.0 0 2 - 0 1 x ) 1 - r y 2 - m k ( i P ) s / m k ( c U 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Corr No-Corr 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) Corr No-Corr 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) 0 2 - 0 1 x ) 1 - r y 2 - m k ( i P ) s / m k ( c U 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 6.4 5.6 4.8 4 3.2 2.4 1.6 Corr No-Corr 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) Corr No-Corr 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) Figure 4. Intrinsic probability of collision Pi (top panel) and impact velocity Uc (bottom panel) for a planetesimal belt per- turbed by a Jupiter -- size planet with ap = 5 and ep = 0.1. The belt is assumed to have been initially cold so that ep = ef . The green filled squares mark the predictions of the canonical model where no secular correlation is assumed between e and while the empty red squares are the values computed with the model that include the secular correlation. The dashed line in the bot- tom panel outlines the values derived from the analytic formula Uc = 1.4ef vkep (Mustill & Wyatt 2009). radial distance is larger for the planetesimals and the orbital crossing is more extended. In Fig. 5 we show both Pi and Uc when the eccentricity of the planet is increased to 0.6, a significantly more per- turbed configuration for the planetesimal belt. The value of Pi is increased by about a factor 4 leading to a very ac- tive belt in terms of collisions while the impact velocity Uc is five times higher compared to the case with epl = 0.1 and comparable to the value of the present asteroid belt. The vast majority of collisions are expected to be highly en- ergetic and both fragmentation and cratering are possibly dominant leading to a high rate of dust production. These results show that a higher eccentricity of the planet not only leads to higher impact speeds but it substantially increases the impact rate (larger Pi) which is possibly more important in producing brighter debris disks. Figure 5. Same as Fig. 4 but for ep = 0.6. Our numerical algorithm allows to compute the contri- bution to the average Pi and Uc coming from a restricted arc of the trajectory of the target, or, more precisely, from a given range of values of the true anomaly f . Thanks to this feature, we can evaluate the frequency of collision and impact velocity around the pericentre and apocentre, respec- tively. We have selected a range of ±15o around both f = 0o and f = 180o for each target in order to underline different values of Pi and Uc in these restricted ranges. The results are shown in Fig. 6 for the models in which the eccentricity of the planet is set to ep = 0.1 and ep = 0.6, respectively. When ep = 0.1, the difference between Pi and Uc at pericentre and apocentre is small. However, when ep = 0.6 a significantly higher value of Pi is observed when the target is at the apocentre and hence in the inner regions of the belt. Beyond 17 AU the trend reverses and Pi becomes larger at pericentre. This behaviour is due to the high forced (and then proper) eccentricity induced by the secular perturba- tions of the planet. When the target is close to the inner border of the belt its pericentre is located where the density of potential projectiles is significantly lower due to the over- all eccentricity distribution ranging from 0 and 2 ef . On the other hand, when the target orbits around the apocentre, it 10 0 2 - 0 1 x ) 1 - r y 2 - m k ( i P ) s / m k ( c U 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 8 7.2 6.4 5.6 4.8 4 3.2 2.4 1.6 0.8 0 ep = 0.1, per ep = 0.1, apo ep = 0.6, per ep = 0.6, apo 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) ep = 0.1, per ep = 0.1, apo ep = 0.6, per ep = 0.6, apo 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) Figure 6. Intrinsic probability of collision Pi (top panel) and im- pact velocity Uc (bottom panel) computed around the pericentre (−15o < f < 15o) and apocentre (165o < f < 195o) of all targets. The eccentricity of the planet is set to ep = 0.1 and ep = 0.6. is well within the belt where the density of the projectiles is the highest and Pi is large. Moving towards the outer bor- der of the belt, it is now the apocentre of the targets that is located in low density regions while the pericentre is well within the belt and this leads to higher values of Pi. Super- imposed to this effect there is also the decreasing trend of Pi for larger values of a due to a reduction of both the forced eccentricity and radial density of the planetesimal popula- tion. The values of Pi shown in Fig. 6 are only a fraction of the total impact probability illustrated in Fig. 5 since we are considering only a portion of the total range of the true anomaly f and, as a consequence, they are substantially smaller than the values in Fig. 5. Significantly different values of Uc are also found at peri- centre and apocentre when ep = 0.6. At apocentre the values of the impact speed are comparable with the average values shown in Fig. 5 but at pericetre Uc is much higher since the target has a higher orbital velocity compared to the po- tential projectiles. Due to the correlation between e and , a significant number of impacts when the target is at the pericentre occurs with circular orbits having radius approx- imately equal to a(1 − e). By comparison, at apocentre the target will frequently encounter projectiles on circular or- bits with radius a(1 + e). As a consequence, at pericentre the impact velocity Uc is higher. 4.2 Initially warm belt In a scenario where the planet is injected in an orbit perturb- ing an already heated planetesimal belt, the values of Pi and Uc are different respect to those of a cold belt because of the changes in the secular dynamics (Fig. 2). Here we consider three test cases where the proper eccentricity ep0, before the onset of the planet perturbations, is 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 that of the forced eccentricity (the value that will be established once the planet approaches the belt). Different values of ep0 can be encountered in real systems and our choice to link ep to ef is arbitrary, but it is impossible to explore all possible initial distributions of ep0, so we consider only three refer- ence cases, where ep0 is linearly related to ef , which give clues on how to deal with any general scenario. In Fig. 7 we compare Pi and Uc when epl = 0.1 for all the different initial configurations corresponding to dis- tinct dynamical states of the belt prior to the onset of the planet perturbations, i.e. cold and warm belts. This compar- ison highlights the effects on Pi and Uc of different degrees of correlation between e and related to the distinct ini- tial values of ep0. Both the intrinsic probability of collision and impact velocity increase for higher values of ep0 (ini- tially warm belts) until, for ep0 = ef , values comparable to those of the uncorrelated case (the canonical one) are obtained. This increase is due to the complex interplay of dynamical effects which can be deduced from Fig.2. First of all in warm belts higher eccentricity values are achieved since ep ranges from ef − ep0 to ef + ep0 respect to the cold scenario where ep = ef . In addition, when the pericentre is around 180o the planetesimal eccentricities are not all small as illustrated in Fig.1 but they may reach significant values (Fig.2). Finally, pseudo -- librators, whose fraction de- pends on the initial value of ep0, impact with non -- librators leading to geometrical configurations where the trajectories at the crossing are more bent and favour larger collisional velocities. All these mechanisms contribute to increase both Pi and Uc up to values similar to those of the canonical case also when epl = 0.6, as illustrated in Fig. 8. Our numerical models show that initial warm belts have a more intense collisional activity due to higher values of both Pi and Uc. This leads to a greater production of dust and a brighter debris disk associated to the belt but also to a faster erosion rate with a shorter lifetime. The value of impact velocity Uc shown in the previous plots is indeed an average over a large number of computed impact speeds. The velocity distribution in the standard case with epl = 0.6 for the target with aT = 15 AU is displayed in Fig. 9. The black dashed line shows the impact velocity distribution in absence of e -- correlation (a warm belt not perturbed by a planet) while the red continuous line illus- trates the distribution when such correlation is included in the computation of Uc for an initially cold belt. The high velocity tail of the distribution is cut off and this explains the reduction in the average impact speed observed in Fig.5. In the warm case with ep0 = 0.5ef the cut off at high impact speeds is reduced compared to the case with ep0 = 0 due to the contribution of pseudo -- librators impacting circulators. 3.0 2.0 1.0 0 2 - 0 1 x ) 1 - r y 2 - m k ( i P 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 ) s / m k ( c U Collisional parameters of planetesimal belts 11 ep0 = 0 ep0 = 0.25 ef ep0 = 0.5 ef ep0 = 1.0 ef 0 2 - 0 1 x ) 1 - r y 2 - m k ( i P 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 ep0 = 0 ep0 = 0.25 ef ep0 = 0.5 ef ep0 = 1.0 ef 10 12 14 16 18 20 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) ep0 = 0 ep0 = 0.25 ef ep0 = 0.5 ef ep0 = 1.0 ef 6.4 5.6 4.8 4 3.2 2.4 ) s / m k ( c U a (AU) ep0 = 0 ep0 = 0.25 ef ep0 = 0.5 ef ep0 = ef 10 12 14 16 18 20 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) a (AU) Figure 7. Pi (upper panel) and Uc (lower panel) for initially warm and cold belts. For the warm belts we assume three different values of ep0, i.e. 0.25 (green empty squares), 0.5 (blue empty squares) and 1 times ef (magenta empty squares). The red filled squares mark the values of Pi and Uc for a cold belt while the black empty circles show the case with ep = ef without secular perturbations. The eccentricity of the perturbing planet is set to epl = 0.1. However, the peak is located at lower impact speeds and the average value of Uc is still lower compared to the case without e -- correlation. n o i t c a r F 4.3 Initially warm and inclined belt: i = 15o In presence of a strong dynamical excitation, due to possi- ble different mechanisms like self -- stirring, the presence of large planetary embryos, resonance sweeping etc., even the osculating inclinations may be significantly pumped up. We explore in this section the effects of increasing the average value of inclination on the values of Pi and Uc. Intuitively, one would expect an increase in the relative impact velocity due to the presence of an additional out -- of -- plane compo- nent in the difference between the velocity vectors of two planetesimals. At the same time, due to an expansion of the available space for orbital motion, a significant decrease of the impact probability is expected. Both these predictions Figure 8. Same as Fig. 7 but for epl = 0.6. 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 ep0 = 0 No-Corr ep0 = 0 Corr ep0 = ef/2 Corr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 v (km/s) Figure 9. Normalised impact velocity distribution for ep = ef without the secular correlation between e and (black dashed line) and for the case in which such correlation is included in the computations (red continuous line). The blue dotted line illus- trates the velocity distribution for a warm belt with ep0 = 0.5· ef . 0.25 -- 3o 0.5 -- 3o 1.0 -- 3o 0.25 -- 15o 0.5 -- 15o 1.0 -- 15o 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) 0.25 -- 3o 0.5 -- 3o 1.0 -- 3o 0.25 -- 15o 0.5 -- 15o 1.0 -- 15o 12 0 2 - 0 1 x ) 1 - r y 2 - m k ( i P 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 6.4 5.6 4.8 4 3.2 2.4 ) s / m k ( c U 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) Figure 10. Intrinsic probability of collision Pi and impact ve- locity Uc for a small body belt with ep0 = 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 ef and i = 15o, compared to the values computed for i = 3o. The perturbing planet has an eccentricity epl = 0.6. While Pi is signifi- cantly reduced, the impact velocity Uc is approximately increased by 40%. are confirmed by the outcome of our algorithm and in Fig. 10 we show the computed values of Pi and Uc for initially warm belts with ep0 = 0.25, 0.5, 1 · ef and an average inclination of 15o (the perturbing planet has epl = 0.6). The explo- ration of larger values of inclination would require a more detailed secular approach where the inclination is coupled to the node longitude and this will be done in a forthcoming paper. In the case of inclined belts, the value of Pi in the inner regions of the belt is reduced by about a factor of 4 compared to the case with i = 3o (see Fig.10). On the other hand, the impact velocity Uc is higher for more inclined planetesimals due to the out -- of -- plane component in the relative velocity, reaching a maximum value of 8 km/s at 10 AU from the star when ep0 = 1 · ef (magenta empty squares in the bottom panel of Fig. 10). However, a higher inclination appears to be not as important as a higher values of ep0 in leading to higher impact speed. In general, according to our modelling, an inclined belt is expected to be less collisionally active due to the strong decrease in Pi, in spite of an increase of Uc. This will be confirmed by the collisional evolution models of the next section. 4.4 Collisionally damped belt We consider here the case of a densely populated belt whose proper eccentricity distribution, after the approach of the planet, has been collisionally damped. In this scenario most of the orbital excitation is dissipated and the proper ec- centricity is reduced to values smaller than the forced one. This would lead to the dynamical state illustrated in Fig.3 where all the planetesimals are in pseudo -- libration. We com- pute the intrinsic probability of collision and impact veloc- ity when the damped configuration is reached. To model this kind of belt we select a value of proper eccentricity, after the damping, which is half the value of the forced one. Even in this case, the choice is made to give an idea of the influence of this secular configuration on the collisional evolution of the belt, i.e. on the values of Pi and Uc, and it is not related to any particular scenario. For a damped belt both Pi and Uc are reduced (see Fig.11) and this has to be ascribed to the pseudo -- libration of all planetesimals. oscillates within a limited range around 0o leading to a significant level of pericentre alignment of all orbits. This dynamical configuration leads to collisions where the trajectories of the approaching planetesimals are almost parallel at the orbital crossing. As a consequence, there is a consistent reduction of the impact velocity and impact rate. A damped belt is then expected to be less col- lisionally active and it will give rise to debris disks which are less bright. 5 COLLISIONAL EVOLUTION collisional To explore the implications of different values of Pi and Uc on the evolution of a planetesimal belt we have run a simple one-dimensional evolu- tion code (Campo Bagatin et al. 1994; Marzari et al. 1995; Bottke et al. 2005). We start from an initial planetesimal population extending from 10 to 500 km in diameter and distributed in a series of discrete logarithmic diameter bins following a slope equal to -3.5. The population is centred at 15 AU and it is 10 AU wide. The code computes the col- lisional interactions of each size bin with every other one during a given time -- step. At the end of the time -- step, all the outcomes of the interactions are summed up to find the net change in the population as a function of size. The up- dated population is then used in the next time -- step until the whole time -- span, that we assume to be 4 Gyr, is covered. These calculations are performed under the assumption that the orbital element distribution of the planetesimals is not significantly altered by the collisions so that both Pi and Uc remain constant during the entire evolution of the belt. Two different scaling laws for the computation of the fragments size distribution after a catastrophic impact are tested: a simple energy scaling like that proposed in Davis & Farinella (1997) to study the collisional evolution of Kuiper Belt ob- jects and the more recent one given in Stewart & Leinhardt (2009) for weak aggregates (their Eq. 2). The results are not significantly different so we report only those obtained with the scaling law of Stewart & Leinhardt (2009). 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0 2 - 0 1 x ) 1 - r y 2 - m k ( i P ) s / m k ( c U 4.8 4 3.2 2.4 1.6 0.8 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) ep = ef/2 ep = ef 10 12 14 16 18 20 a (AU) Figure 11. Intrinsic probability of collision Pi and impact ve- locity Uc for a small body belt collisionally damped after the onset of the planet perturbations. The eccentricity of the planet is set to 0.6 and the proper eccentricity is assumed to have been damped to a value ep = 0.5 · ef . Both Pi and Uc are compared to the values computed for a non -- damped cold belt (filled green squares). There is a significant decrease of both Pi and Uc due to the pseudo -- libration of all planetesimals. We have run four different models: two for cold belts with epl = 0.1 and epl = 0.6, one for an initially warm belt where epl = 0.6 and ep0 = 0.5 · ef , and the last case for epl = 0.6, ep0 = 0.5 · ef and i = 15o. The evolved planetesi- mal populations in the four different cases are shown in Fig. 12. When epl = 0.6, the erosion of the belt leads to a signifi- cant reduction in the number of planetesimals even at large sizes. Compared to the case with epl = 0.1, the simulation with epl = 0.6 shows an erosion rate about 10 times faster over 4 Gyr. A significant larger amount of dust is then ex- pected to be produced when the eccentricity of the planet is higher, at least in the initial phases of evolution of the belt, as it could have been argued by the larger values of both Pi and Uc. However, old belts may have been signifi- cantly depleted by the the initial fast collisional erosion and show at present a dust production rate comparable or even lower than that of young and less depleted belts around low eccentricity planets. The collisional evolution of an initial warm belt with Collisional parameters of planetesimal belts 13 ep = ef/2 ep=ef 1e+10 1e+08 1e+06 10000 100 n b i r e t e m a d i r e p s e d o b i f o . N IP 0.1c 0.6c 0.6w 0.6i 1 0.1 1 10 D(KM) 100 1000 Figure 12. Collisional evolution over 4 Gyr of a putative plan- etesimal belt, centred at 15 AU and 5 AU wide, for two different values of the planet eccentricity epl, i.e. 0.1 and 0.6, and for a warm and inclined population. The values of Pi and Uc used in the collisional evolution code are taken from the previous compu- tations. The initial size distribution (red line), divided in a series of discrete bins, is truncated at 10 and 500 km in diameters. The erosion of the belt is faster in the case labelled 0.6w (magenta circles) where epl = 0.6 and ep0 = 0.5 · ef , i.e. a warm belt. The initial cold belt with the same planet eccentricity (0.6c) (blue filled circles) differs only slightly from the 0.6w case. When the inclination of the warm belt is increased to 15o the collisional evolution is reduced, as expected by the strong decrease of Pi (see Fig.10). The case with epl = 0.1, labelled 0.1c, illustrates the evolution of a cold belt perturbed by a low inclination planet and it is the less collisionally active case. ep0 = 0.5 · ef and epl = 0.6 is only slightly faster compared to an initial cold belt (ep0 = 0) and a similar dust production rate is expected. This shows that, in spite of an increase of the impact velocity Uc in the warm case, the two dynamical configurations lead to a similar collisional evolution because Pi is almost equal. This is confirmed also by the inclined case where a lower value of Pi leads to a less eroded belt in spite of a higher collisional velocity (see Fig.10). This suggests that the intrinsic probability of collision is decisive in determining the erosion of a small body belt notwithstanding different values of impact velocity. The previous modelling must be considered only as in- dicative since additional information are needed in particu- lar about the structural strength and porosity of the plan- etesimals since these physical aspects are heavily involved in the computation of the outcome of mutual collisions. In addition, this code is limited in the size range that it can cover and it does not possess spatial resolution. It cannot be compared with codes like DyCoSS and LIDT-DD (Th´ebault 2012; Kral et al. 2013) describing the evolution of a de- bris disk both in time and space, including effects like the Poynting -- Robertson drag and creating a coupling between dynamics and collisions. The only advantage of our simpli- fied code is that it can predict on the long term (timescale of the order of Gyrs) how the dust production rate will decline and establish a potential correlation between the age of the star and the luminosity of the belt. It can also be used in a reverse approach allowing to determine the size distribution 14 of the primordial belt from the present belt around an aged star, as it is usually done for the asteroid belt in the solar system. 6 THE BELT IN HD 38529: COMPARISON WITH ǫ ERIDANI HD 38529 is a complex system where two massive plan- ets have been found to orbit the central body, a 3.5 Gyr old G8 type star. Their masses are 0.8 and 12.2 MJ and their orbital elements are a1 = 0.13 AU , a2 = 3.74 AU, e1 = 0.25 and e2 = 0.35, respectively (Butler et al. 2006). Moro-Mart´ın et al. (2007b) found from Spitzer data an in- frared excess that interpreted as due to the presence of a debris disk. From dynamical constraints they located the dust -- producing long -- lived planetesimals in three regions. A small inner ring orbiting between the two planets from 0.4 to 0.8 AU, a wider outer belt extending from 20 to 50 AU and an even outer one beyond 60 AU. The two outer belts are separated from a strong secular resonance located at about 55 AU. We focus our study on the belt extending from 20 to 50 AU where Moro-Mart´ın et al. (2007b) constrain the loca- tion of the dust -- producing planetesimals. They in fact find that the debris disk is collision -- dominated implying that the planetesimals approximately share the same orbits as the emitting dust. We compute for this system the intrin- sic probability of collision and impact velocity at different radial distances within 20 and 50 AU. In Fig. 13 we show Pi and Uc for this belt. We consider only the outer more massive planet as perturber and we neglect the influence of the smaller inner one. Compared to the Kuiper Belt in the solar system, the intrinsic probability of collision appears to be larger in particular in the inner regions of the belt. According to Dell'Oro et al. (2001), Pi in the Kuiper Belt ranges from 3.14 to 4.44 ×10−22 yr−1 km−2 while from Fig. 13 for 38529 Pi is at least three times larger in between 20 to 30 AU. On the other hand, the impact velocity in the HD 38529 debris disk appears to be smaller than that in the Kuiper belt whose value is about 1.23 -- 1.44 km/s. In short, in HD 38529 collisions are expected to be more frequent but less energetic. By using the values of Pi and Uc at the centre of the belt (35 AU) (see Fig. 13) we run the collisional evolution code. In Fig. 14 the evolution with time of the size distri- bution of an initial planetesimal belt equal to that used for Fig. 12 is shown. Compared to Fig. 12, the shattering events are significantly reduced and only a limited amount of bod- ies smaller than 100 km in diameter are catastrophically disrupted. This must be ascribed to the lower value of Pi which is about 30 times smaller for the HD 38529 belt com- pared to the Pi of our standard case. The dust production rate is then expected to be significantly lower. The difference observed between the cold and warm case at small sizes is due to the slightly larger number of big bodies disrupted in the warm belt, phenomenon which can barely be seen in Fig. 12 in between 10 and 40 km. The fragments produced in these breakups refill the size distribution at smaller di- ameters explaining the larger number of small bodies in the warm belt. Together with HD 38529, also ǫ Eridani has a de- bris disk identified by dust emission (Greaves et al. 1998; ep0 = 0 ep0 = 0.25 ef ep0 = 0.5 ef ep0 = 1.0 ef ep = 0.5 ef 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 a (AU) ep0 = 0 ep0 = 0.25 ef ep0 = 0.5 ef ep0 = 1.0 ef ep = 0.5 ef 2 2 - 0 1 x ) 1 - r y 2 - m k ( i P ) s / m k ( c U 18.0 15.0 12.0 9.0 6.0 3.0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 a (AU) Figure 13. Pi (upper panel) and Uc (lower panel) for the belt observed in the HD 38529 system. We consider three different models: an initial cold belt with ep = ef (ep0 = 0), an initial warm belt with different values of ep0 and a collisionally damped belt with ep = 0.5 · ef . MacGregor et al. 2015). The belt is supposed to extend from approximately 53 to 80 AU from the central star and it is perturbed by a giant planet with a mass approximately 1.66 times the mass of Jupiter and on an orbit with semimajor axis equal to 3.39 AU and eccentricity of 0.7 (Benedict et al. 2006b). This belt has approximately the same radial exten- sion of that around HD 38529 (about 30 AU) but it is located farther out from the star. The mass in the dust estimated in the ǫ Eridani debris disk is about 2 × 10−5M⊙, according to Li et al. (2003). This value is significantly higher compared to that inferred for HD 38529 by Moro-Mart´ın et al. (2007b) of 1−5×10−10 even if this was obtained for particles of 10 µm in size. A higher dust mass for ǫ Eridani can only partially be explained by the younger age of the system (about 800 Myr for ǫ Eridani vs. 3.28 Gyr for HD 38529). We have computed the intrinsic probability of collision and impact velocity for the putative planetesimal belt precursor of the debris disk in ǫ Eridani. At the centre of the belt around 67 AU we find Pi ∼ 2 × 10−23 km−2yr−1 and an average impact velocity of about Uc ∼ 0.1km/s while for HD 38529 in the centre of the belt at 35 AU (see Fig. 13) we have Pi ∼ 4.5 × 10−22 Initial pop. ep0 = 0 ep0 = 0.5 ef 1e+10 1e+08 1e+06 10000 100 n b i r e t e m a d i r e p s e d o b i f o . N 1 0.1 1 10 D(KM) 100 1000 Figure 14. Collisional evolution of a planetesimal belt in the HD 38529. The erosion rate is much slower compared to that of the standard case shown in Fig. 12 due to the lower values of both Pi and Uc. The warm belt is slightly collisionally more active since a larger number of bodies are disrupted in between 10 and 40 km in diameter. These breakups produce smaller fragments which refill the population at small sizes. km−2yr−1 and Uc ∼ 0.35km/s (assuming in both cases an initial cold belt). The collisional activity is then expected to be at least 20 times faster in HD 38529 respect to ǫ Eridani. However, as shown in Fig.14, the collisional evolution in HD 38529 cannot have led to a significant erosion of the belt even after 3.28 Gyr. Why is then the dust in the debris disk around ǫ Eridani more dense than that around HD 38529? The only possible explanation is that the planetesimal belt in ǫ Eridani is significantly more populated respect to that of HD 38529. The star of ǫ Eridani is less massive compared to that of HD 38529 (0.83 vs. 1.39 M⊙) so it is difficult to imagine that the protoplanetary disk around ǫ Eridani was much more dense than that around HD 38529. One possibil- ity is that the dynamical history of HD 38529 has been more turbulent with extended periods of planet -- planet scattering. This behaviour might have depleted the belt, as suggested by (Bonsor et al. 2013; Marzari 2014), leaving a lighter belt that subsequently evolved under mutual collisions. This evo- lution might explain the present difference between the two systems. 7 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The dust production rate in a debris disk, and then its brightness, strongly depends on the collisional evolution of the parent planetesimal belt. Since planetesimals are rem- nants of the planet formation process it is then reasonable to expect that one or more planets formed in the system, notwithstanding any significant correlation between stars with dust emission and the presence of known planets is still under scrutiny. The collisional evolution of planetesimals and the dust production rate can be determined once both the physical structure of the bodies (in particular strength and porosity) and two fundamental dynamical parameters, the intrinsic probability of collision Pi and the mutual im- pact velocity Uc, are known. While the physical structure Collisional parameters of planetesimal belts 15 of planetesimals depends on the dust accumulation process in the early phases of the circumstellar disk evolution, the values of the two parameters Pi and Uc are uniquely de- termined by the orbital architecture of the system. This in turn depends on planetesimal accumulation and planet formation but it is possibly influenced also by other evolu- tionary processes like planet migration by tidal interaction with the gaseous disk and phases of planet -- planet scatter- ing. This last mechanism is expected to have occurred in a significant fraction of systems due to the large number of exoplanets found in highly eccentric orbits. Planet -- planet scattering not only excites eccentricity but it also moves planets around during the chaotic period characterised by mutual close encounters between the planets prior to the ejection of one (or more) out of the system. A planetesimal belt can be affected by the dynami- cal behaviour of the planets and we can envision different scenarios in which planets and planetesimal belts interact, evolve and finally coexist. We are interested in a scenario where a planet perturbs the belt from an inside eccentric orbit. This configuration can be achieved via a smooth path where the planet, after its formation, evolved close to the belt without dramatic dynamical events and in a low ec- centricity orbit. In this case the belt is expected to be ini- tially cold before the onset of the secular perturbations of the planet. If instead the planet is involved in a period of planet -- planet scattering, its present location close to the belt would be the outcome of a chaotic past and its eccen- tricity is expected to be high. In this second scenario, the belt may have been affected by a period of planet -- planet scattering at different levels. It may have been spared by most of the chaotic evolution of the planets and, when one planet ends up in a close orbit, be directly affected by its sec- ular perturbations starting from a non -- excited state (initial cold belt). In alternative, it may have been stirred up by the planets evolving on highly eccentric orbits induced by the mutual close encounters before a quiet state is established following the ejection of one or more bodies. In this case a warm belt with excited eccentricities and, possibly, inclina- tions would interact with the planet which finally ends up in an orbit close to the belt at the end of the chaotic phase. Intermediate states can also be envisioned where the belt is warmed either by self -- stirring induced by the formation of large embryos or by resonance sweeping by a migrating planet or other possible mechanisms before being perturbed by an incoming planet. In this paper we apply a semi-analytic method specifi- cally designed to compute both Pi and Uc for belts perturbed by a nearby planet. Its secular perturbations force a strong correlation between the eccentricity e and perihelion longi- tude of the planetesimal orbits significantly affecting the values of both Pi and Uc. The knowledge of these two dy- namical parameters allow to model the collisional evolution of a belt and quantitatively predict its erosion over the star age. With suited collisional models these parameters can also be used to infer the early planetesimal population that led to the present belt whose properties are deduced by the re- lated debris disk. From an observational point of view, they can be used to relate the star age to the brightness of the debris disk, taking of course into account the uncertainties on the initial planetesimal population, its physical proper- ties and the planet orbital parameters. It can also predict 16 the frequency of large breakup events in the belt which can lead to a sudden significant enhancement of the brightness of the related debris disk. The parameters we compute can also be used in more refined codes predicting the luminosity of a debris disk for a given planetesimal belt. We consider distinct dynamical configurations in which the planet perturbs either an initial cold or warm belt. In the case of a warm belt, we also contemplate the case in which there is a significant inclination excitation. In addi- tion, we compute the values of Pi and Uc for crowded belts where a significant collisional damping may occur. We focus on a standard case with a Jupiter -- sized planet orbiting at about 5 AU from the star and a planetesimal belt extending beyond 10 AU. We show that the secular perturbations of the planet and, in particular, the correlation between e and typical of these perturbations, cause a reduction of both Pi and Uc respect to a non -- correlated case. This last case may occur, in absence of a close perturbing planet, if the planetesimal belt self -- stirred for example via the formation of large planetary embryos, or if it was perturbed by planets roaming around during a chaotic phase and, when finally a quiet state is reached, it is located far away from any po- tentially perturbing bodies. This finding suggests that the presence of a perturbing planet not always leads to a higher dust production rate and that self -- stirred planetesimal belts might give origin to brighter debris disks. We have tested dif- ferent values of the planet eccentricity finding higher values of both Pi and Uc in presence of more eccentric planets. We also explore as Pi and Uc change when a belt was warm before being secularly perturbed by a planet. In this case, the approximation ep = ef cannot be adopted and the proper eccentricity, after the onset of the planet per- turbations, can assume a range of values from ef − ep0 to ef + ep0 where ep0 is the average eccentricity of the warm planetesimal belt before the planet begins to perturb it. In our modelling we assume that ep0 is a fixed fraction of the forced eccentricity, an arbitrary choice simply dictated by the need of avoiding a random selection of initial values. We do not consider scenarios where ep0 is initially larger than ef . For warm belts we find an increase in the collisional activity respect to initially cold belts but they are still less colli- sionally eroded compared to the 'self -- stirred' belts, at least until ep0 6 ef . A warm belt is then expected to be gradually depleted on shorter timescales. A dynamically excited belt may also have high inclinations. In this configuration an in- crease of the relative velocity and a decrease of the intrinsic probability of collision are found. However, the two effects do not compensate and the reduction of Pi leads to a lower erosion rate compared to a small body belt with low inclina- tion. This proves the dominating role of Pi in determining the collisional evolution of a minor body population. We have applied our formalism to model the case of the debris disk detected in HD 38529. The collisional activ- ity in the putative belt hosting the leftover planetesimals is low compared to the standard case we have studied in this paper and after 4 Gyr of collisional evolution only a low percentage of bodies smaller than 100 km are expected to have been disrupted by collisions. However, the planetesi- mal belt appears to be more collisionally active compared to that detected around ǫ Eridani. This finding is at odds with the observations of the debris disks around the two stars with that around ǫ Eridani being more dense respect to that around HD 38529. One possible explanation is that a turbulent dynamical past depleted the belt around HD 38529 reducing the number density of planetesimals. On the basis of the secular theory, we can envisage the following evolution of the brightness of a debris disk associ- ated with an initially cold belt. At the beginning, when the planet approaches the belt, the dust production rate will slowly increase during the progressive randomisation of the pericentre. When the s are still in phase, low impact veloc- ities are expected but at subsequent times the progressively different values of pericentre longitudes will lead to more energetic collisions and a higher dust production rate. The debris disk will become brighter. When the full randomisa- tion is reached, from then on the dominant mechanism will be the slow erosion of the planetesimal belt due to mutual collisions and the brightness of the associated debris disk will slowly decrease with time. The rate of luminosity de- crease can be estimated on the basis of Pi and Uc which are the basic parameters to determine the collisional evolution of the belt. The situation appears slightly more complex for an ini- tially warm belt. At the beginning, just after the arrival of the planet, the pericentre evolution quickly leads pseudo -- librators to cross the orbits of circulators causing a fast rise in the collisional rate and an increase in the luminosity of the associated debris disk. However, at subsequent time this initial highly collisional state will develop into a dynamical configuration where the the secular perturbations are fully developed and the erosion with follow the same path as in a cold belt even if with different speed due to the higher values of Pi and Uc. In presence of a strong collisional damping, like in a very crowded belt, the dynamics is dominated by the pseudo -- libration of all planetesimals and the collisional activity is strongly reduced with values of both Pi and Uc significantly smaller respect to both the cases of cold and warm non -- damped belts. It is clear that, on the basis of the values of Pi and Uc we can derive different relations between the brightness of a disk and the age of the star, since the erosion of the belt will be faster or slower depending on the orbital parameters of the planet and the dynamical state of the belt at the onset of the secular perturbations. In this paper we have focused on the perturbations of a single planet on a planetesimal belt, but systems of mul- tiple giant planets perturbing coexisting belts can be found as well. In this last case a more complex secular evolu- tion is expected. However, our algorithm for computing Pi and Uc can be easily applied to these systems once the the frequencies of perihelion precession of all planets are com- puted. If the eccentricities of the planets are high, the linear secular theory may be a rough approximation for comput- ing the real frequencies and higher order theories may be needed (Michtchenko & Malhotra 2004; Libert & Henrard 2005). This problem will be faced in a subsequent paper. Concerning the contribution from mean motion reso- nances to the collisional evolution of a belt, it can be con- sidered negligible in a configuration where a single planet perturbs a wide belt considering the tiny resonance width even for highly eccentric planets. Together with secular reso- nances, mean motion resonances may cause local differences in the brightness of the debris disk associated to the belt but they are not expected to cause significant differences in the overall collisional evolution of wide belts. For narrow belts a dedicated dynamical exploration may be necessary to evaluate the contribution of resonances. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank an anonymous referee for his/her useful comments and suggestions that helped to significantly improve the pa- per. REFERENCES Collisional parameters of planetesimal belts 17 Kral, Q., Th´ebault, P., & Charnoz, S. 2013, A&A, 558, A121 Krivov, A. V. 2010, Research in Astronomy and Astro- physics, 10, 383 Li, A., Lunine, J. I., & Bendo, G. J. 2003, ApJL, 598, L51 Libert, A.-S. & Henrard, J. 2005, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 93, 187 MacGregor, M. A., Wilner, D. J., Andrews, S. M., Lestrade, J.-F., & Maddison, S. 2015, APJ, 809, 47 Marzari, F. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1419 Marzari, F., Davis, D., & Vanzani, V. 1995, Icarus, 113, 168 Matthews, B. C., Krivov, A. V., Wyatt, M. C., Bryden, G., & Eiroa, C. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 521 Meshkat, T., Bailey, V. P., Su, K. Y. L., et al. 2015, ApJ, Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Gatewood, G., et al. 800, 5 2006a, Aj, 132, 2206 Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Gatewood, G., et al. 2006b, AJ, 132, 2206 Michtchenko, T. A. & Malhotra, R. 2004, Icarus, 168, 237 Moro-Mart´ın, A., Carpenter, J. M., Meyer, M. R., et al. 2007a, ApJ, 658, 1312 Bonsor, A., Raymond, S. N., & Augereau, J.-C. 2013, MN- Moro-Mart´ın, A., Malhotra, R., Carpenter, J. M., et al. RAS, 433, 2938 Bottke, W. F., Broz, M., B'Brien, D. P., et al. 2002, The Collisional Evolution of the Main Asteroid Belt, 701 -- 725 Bottke, W. F., Durda, D. D., Nesvorn´y, D., et al. 2005, Icarus, 175, 111 2007b, Apj, 668, 1165 Moro-Mart´ın, A., Wolf, S., & Malhotra, R. 2005, Apj, 621, 1079 Murray, C. D. & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar system dy- namics Bottke, W. F., Nolan, M. C., Greenberg, R., & Kolvoord, R. A. 1994, Icarus, 107, 255 Mustill, A. J. & Wyatt, M. C. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 1403 Opik, E. J. 1951, Proc. R. Irish Acad. Sect. A, vol. 54, Bryden, G., Beichman, C. A., Carpenter, J. M., et al. 2009, p. 165-199 (1951)., 54, 165 Apj, 705, 1226 Shannon, A., Bonsor, A., Kral, Q., & Matthews, E. 2016, Butler, R. P., Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2006, Apj, MNRAS, 462, L116 646, 505 Sibthorpe, B., Ivison, R. J., Massey, R. J., et al. 2013, Campo Bagatin, A., Cellino, A., Davis, D. R., Farinella, P., MNRAS, 428, L6 Stewart, G. R. & Wetherill, G. W. 1988, Icarus, 74, 542 Stewart, S. T. & Leinhardt, Z. M. 2009, ApjL, 691, L133 Su, K. Y. L. & Rieke, G. H. 2014, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 299, Exploring the Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems, ed. M. Booth, B. C. Matthews, & J. R. Graham, 318 -- 321 Th´ebault, P. 2012, A&A, 537, A65 Th´ebault, P., Marzari, F., & Scholl, H. 2006, Icarus, 183, 193 Trilling, D. E., Bryden, G., Beichman, C. A., et al. 2008, Apj, 674, 1086 Wetherill, G. W. 1967, JGR, 72, 2429 Whitmire, D. P., Matese, J. J., Criswell, L., & Mikkola, S. 1998, Icarus, 132, 196 Wyatt, M. C., Smith, R., Greaves, J. S., et al. 2007, Apj, 658, 569 This paper has been typeset from a TEX/ LATEX file prepared by the author. & Paolicchi, P. 1994, PSS, 42, 1079 Chambers, J. E. & Wetherill, G. W. 2001, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 36, 381 Davis, D., Durda, D., Marzari, F., Campo Bagatin, A., & Gil-Hutton, R. 2002, Collisional Evolution of Small-Body Populations, ed. W. F. Bottke, Jr., A. Cellino, P. Paolic- chi, & R. P. Binzel, 545 -- 558 Davis, D. R. & Farinella, P. 1997, Icarus, 125, 50 Dell'Oro, A. 2016, MNRAS, submitted, 183 Dell'Oro, A., Marzari, F., Paolicchi, P., & Vanzani, V. 2001, A&A, 366, 1053 Dell'Oro, A., Paolicchi, F., Marzari, P., Dotto, E., & Van- zani, V. 1998, A&A, 339, 272 Dell'Oro, A. & Paolicchi, P. 1997, PSS, 45, 779 Dell'Oro, A. & Paolicchi, P. 1998, Icarus, 136, 328 Everhart, E. 1985, in Dynamics of Comets: Their Ori- gin and Evolution, Proceedings of IAU Colloq. 83, held in Rome, Italy, June 11-15, 1984. Edited by Andrea Carusi and Giovanni B. Valsecchi. Dordrecht: Reidel, As- trophysics and Space Science Library. Volume 115, 1985, p.185, ed. A. Carusi & G. B. Valsecchi, 185 Farinella, P. & Davis, D. R. 1992, Icarus, 97, 111 Greaves, J. S., Holland, W. S., Moriarty-Schieven, G., et al. 1998, ApJL, 506, L133 Heppenheimer, T. A. 1978, A&A, 65, 421 Hillenbrand, L. A., Carpenter, J. M., Kim, J. S., et al. 2008, Apj, 677, 630 Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Chiang, E., et al. 2008, Science, 322, 1345 Kenyon, S. J. & Bromley, B. C. 2004, Aj, 127, 513
1611.09236	1	1611	2016-11-28T16:50:58	An Overabundance of Low-density Neptune-like Planets	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present a uniform analysis of the atmospheric escape rate of Neptune-like planets with estimated radius and mass (restricted to $M_{\rm p}<30\,M_{\oplus}$). For each planet we compute the restricted Jeans escape parameter, $\Lambda$, for a hydrogen atom evaluated at the planetary mass, radius, and equilibrium temperature. Values of $\Lambda\lesssim20$ suggest extremely high mass-loss rates. We identify 27 planets (out of 167) that are simultaneously consistent with hydrogen-dominated atmospheres and are expected to exhibit extreme mass-loss rates. We further estimate the mass-loss rates ($L_{\rm hy}$) of these planets with tailored atmospheric hydrodynamic models. We compare $L_{\rm hy}$ to the energy-limited (maximum-possible high-energy driven) mass-loss rates. We confirm that 25 planets (15\% of the sample) exhibit extremely high mass-loss rates ($L_{\rm hy}>0.1\,M_{\oplus}{\rm Gyr}^{-1}$), well in excess of the energy-limited mass-loss rates. This constitutes a contradiction, since the hydrogen envelopes cannot be retained given the high mass-loss rates. We hypothesize that these planets are not truly under such high mass-loss rates. Instead, either hydrodynamic models overestimate the mass-loss rates, transit-timing-variation measurements underestimate the planetary masses, optical transit observations overestimate the planetary radii (due to high-altitude clouds), or Neptunes have consistently higher albedos than Jupiter planets. We conclude that at least one of these established estimations/techniques is consistently producing biased values for Neptune planets. Such an important fraction of exoplanets with misinterpreted parameters can significantly bias our view of populations studies, like the observed mass--radius distribution of exoplanets for example.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) Preprint 29 November 2016 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 An overabundance of low-density Neptune-like planets Patricio Cubillos1⋆, Nikolai V. Erkaev2, Ines Juvan1, Luca Fossati1, Colin P. Johnstone3, Helmut Lammer1, Monika Lendl1, Petra Odert1, and Kristina G. Kislyakova1 1 Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstrasse 6, A-8042 Graz, Austria. 2 Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center" SB RAS, "Institute of Computational Modelling". 3 University of Vienna, Department of Astrophysics, Turkenschanzstrasse 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT We present a uniform analysis of the atmospheric escape rate of Neptune-like plan- ets with estimated radius and mass (restricted to Mp < 30 M⊕). For each planet we compute the restricted Jeans escape parameter, Λ, for a hydrogen atom evalu- ated at the planetary mass, radius, and equilibrium temperature. Values of Λ . 20 suggest extremely high mass-loss rates. We identify 27 planets (out of 167) that are simultaneously consistent with hydrogen-dominated atmospheres and are expected to exhibit extreme mass-loss rates. We further estimate the mass-loss rates (Lhy) of these planets with tailored atmospheric hydrodynamic models. We compare Lhy to the energy-limited (maximum-possible high-energy driven) mass-loss rates. We confirm that 25 planets (15% of the sample) exhibit extremely high mass-loss rates (Lhy > 0.1 M⊕Gyr−1), well in excess of the energy-limited mass-loss rates. This con- stitutes a contradiction, since the hydrogen envelopes cannot be retained given the high mass-loss rates. We hypothesize that these planets are not truly under such high mass-loss rates. Instead, either hydrodynamic models overestimate the mass-loss rates, transit-timing-variation measurements underestimate the planetary masses, optical transit observations overestimate the planetary radii (due to high-altitude clouds), or Neptunes have consistently higher albedos than Jupiter planets. We conclude that at least one of these established estimations/techniques is consistently producing biased values for Neptune planets. Such an important fraction of exoplanets with misin- terpreted parameters can significantly bias our view of populations studies, like the observed mass–radius distribution of exoplanets for example. Key words: planets and satellites: atmospheres – planets and satellites: fundamental parameters – hydrodynamics 1 INTRODUCTION The Kepler Space Telescope mission has enabled the first estimations of the abundance and size distribution of ex- trasolar planets in our galaxy (e.g., Fressin et al. 2013; Dressing & Charbonneau 2015). A large fraction of these worlds have sizes intermediate between that of Earth and Neptune, having no analog in our solar system. Further follow-up studies have yielded mass estimates for a large sample of Neptune-like planets (hereafter, considered as those planets with Mp < 30M⊕ ≈ 2MNep), allowing us to study the physical properties of exoplanets in a statistically robust manner. The planetary radius is inferred from optical tran- typically corresponding to light-curve observations, sit ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] c(cid:13) 2016 The Authors level for a clear the ∼ 20 − 100 mbar atmo- sphere (e.g., Lopez & Fortney 2014; Lammer et al. 2016; Lecavelier des Etangs et al. 2008). The planetary mass, in turn, is inferred either from measurements of the stellar ra- dial velocity (RV) or from transit timing variations (TTV) due to interplanetary perturbations. By combining the mass and radius constraints, we can infer bulk densities and com- positions. For a given mass, the planetary radius does not significantly depend on the interior composition, since it is made of very incompressible materials. On the contrary, for a given mass, the hydrogen envelope fraction strongly cor- relates with the planetary radius (Lopez & Fortney 2014). The mass–size distribution shows that a considerable fraction of Neptune-like planets have significant envelopes (a few percent of the core mass). Noteworthy, a couple dozen of sub Neptunes show bulk densities far lower than that of the solar-system giant planets. While it is plausi- 2 P. Cubillos et al. ble that solid cores of a few M⊕ can accrete significant gas envelopes before the protoplanetary disk dissipation (Lee et al. 2014; Inamdar & Schlichting 2015; Stokl et al. 2016; Ginzburg et al. 2016), several studies find that after the disk dispersal these gas envelopes endure significant mass loss due to different mechanisms. Cooling and photoevaporation, driven by the high- energy stellar irradiation (XUV), produce moderate mass- loss rates and atmospheric contraction. These mechanisms act over timescales larger than ∼ 108 yr (e.g., Lopez et al. 2012; Owen & Wu 2013; Ginzburg et al. 2016). Hydrody- namic and photochemical processes determine the composi- tion of the upper atmosphere of these planets, and therefore of the escaping particles Koskinen et al. (e.g., 2013a,b) Using hydrodynamic simulations, Owen & Wu (2016) found that during the first ∼Myr after the disk dispersal, low-density planets exhibit extremely high thermally driven mass-loss rates, dubbed "boil-off" (see also Lammer et al. 2016; Fossati et al. 2016). This mechanism consists of hy- drodynamic thermal evaporation (Parker wind), driven by the internal heat from the planet, and fueled by the stellar continuum irradiation. During this regime, the atmosphere quickly cools and contracts as it releases energy through the escaped particles. In other words, the thermal energy ex- ceeds the gravitational energy in atmospheric layers where the density is high enough to lead to high mass-loss rates. Consequently, the mass-loss rate exponentially decays until the XUV-driven photoevaporation becomes the dominant mass-loss mechanism (Stokl et al. 2015). The extremely high mass-loss rates of this regime are unsustainable for the atmospheres of Neptune-like planets over Gyr timescales. Therefore, only young systems are ex- pected to show thermally driven mass-loss rates in excess of the XUV-driven mass-loss rates (Lammer et al. 2016). Ultraviolet transit observations provide Fossati et al. loss on exoplanets Linsky et al. 2010; evidence (e.g., Vidal-Madjar et al. of mass 2003; 2010; Ben-Jaffel & Ballester 2013). For example, Ly-α transit observations (e.g., Vidal-Madjar et al. 2003; Kulow et al. 2014; Ehrenreich et al. 2015; Bourrier et al. 2016) show transit depths much larger than in the optical. These ob- servations are interpreted as absorption from an extended region of escaping gas beyond the Roche lobe of the planet. However, the translation from observations into mass- loss rates is very model-dependent. Ly-α observations show large offsets between the absorption features and the center of the line (±100 km s−1), requiring addi- tional assumptions to explain the observations. Among the proposed mechanisms there are: natural broadening from large-scale confinement of material into a higher- density region (Stone & Proga 2009; Owen & Adams 2014), a combination of stellar radiation pressure and wind in- teractions, where particles accelerate by charge exchange in the wind-wind interaction region (Holmstrom et al. 2008; Tremblin & Chiang 2013; Kislyakova et al. 2014; Christie et al. 2016), or inhomogeneities of the stellar disc at Ly-α light (Llama et al. 2013). Chamberlain & Hunten 1987). They generalized the Jeans escape parameter for a hydrodynamic atmosphere subjected to the gravitational perturbation from the host star. They studied the upper atmosphere, between the 100 mbar level and the Roche-lobe radius, using hydrodynamic models. By deriving the generalized Jeans escape parameter across the atmospheric layers, they were able to determine how stable a planetary atmosphere is against evaporation. Fossati et al. (2016) further defined the restricted Jeans escape parameter: Λ ≡ GMpmH kBTeqRp , (1) the Jeans escape parameter for a hydrogen atom evaluated at the planetary mass (Mp), radius (Rp), and equilibrium temperature (Teq), where mH is the mass of the hydrogen atom, G is the gravitational constant, and kB is the Boltz- mann constant. For hydrogen-dominated atmospheres, Λ is an easy-to-calculate parameter that allows one to estimate when the hydrodynamic mass-loss rate exceeds the XUV- driven photoevaporation. We note that, whereas the classical Jeans escape param- eter is a variable as function of altitude in an atmosphere, our definition of Λ is a particular value of it that works as a global parameter for a given planet (no altitude de- pendence). This is similar to the definition of Guillot et al. (1996), but evaluated at the planetary equilibrium tempera- ture. Using this specific definition, we empirically found the boil-off threshold at Λ ∼ 20 (Fossati et al. 2016), equivalent to the threshold of R = 0.1RBondi of Owen & Wu (2016). Fossati et al. (2016) determined that planets with Λ . 20–40 should be experiencing extreme mass-loss rates by comparing the hydrodynamic escape rate, Lhy, to the max- imum XUV-driven escape rate, Len (estimated through the energy-limited formula, Watson et al. 1981), over a range of Λ scenarios with varying stellar type, planetary mass, and planetary radius. In this paper we follow up the studies of atmospheric escape, modeling and estimating the present-day mass-loss rates for a sample of known exoplanets. We compile a list of the exoplanets with estimated masses and radii, and calcu- late their restricted Jeans escape parameter, Λ (Section 2). Then, we compute hydrodynamic models tailored for planets suspected of being in the boil-off regime (Section 3). Finally we discuss the observational and physical implications of our findings (Section 4). 2 SAMPLE OF KNOWN NEPTUNES We compiled our sample by collecting and crosschecking the lists of exoplanets from the Nasa Exoplanet Archive1 the Ex- oplanets Data Explorer2 (Han et al. 2014), and The Extra- solar Planets Encyclopaedia3 (Schneider et al. 2012). We se- lected the targets with measured planetary radii and masses, whose mass is less than ∼ 2 Neptune masses (Mp < 30 M⊕). We adopted stellar rotational angular velocity (Ωrot) from 1.1 Restricted Jeans Escape Parameter Fossati et al. (2016) described the thermal escape in terms of the classical Jeans escape parameter (see e.g., 1 http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/ 2 http://exoplanets.org/ 3 http://exoplanet.eu/ MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) McQuillan et al. (2013) and ages from Morton et al. (2016). Our final sample consists of 167 planets (Table A1). Fig. 1 shows the mass–radius–T eq distribution for the planets in this sample. We calculated the equilibrium tem- perature assuming zero Bond albedo and efficient day–night energy redistribution. We split this figure into temperature bins to show representative Λ contours for the planets. This is a heterogeneous sample of planets. The large majority of these planets (90% of the sample) were discov- ered using the transit method from the Kepler Space Tele- scope. The masses of these planets were estimated using the TTV and RV methods (70% and 30% of the sample, respec- tively), with only a few systems having both TTV and RV constraints: Kepler-18, Kepler-89, K2-19, and WASP-47. The distribution of planets in Fig. 1 reflects the selec- tion biases from each observing method. Most RV planets fall into the two panels with higher T eq because the RV method favors planets orbiting closer to their host stars. Furthermore, for a given planet size, the RV method tends to find planets with higher mass while the sensitivity of TTVs is more uniform (Weiss & Marcy 2014; Steffen 2016). Jontof-Hutter et al. (2014) argued that larger planets have deeper transits yielding more precise transit times. Table A1 lists the observed and derived parameters for each planet. We selected the planets consistent with an enve- lope mass fraction larger than 1% (88 planets) by comparing the observed radii to the models of Lopez & Fortney (2014), for the given planetary masses, stellar ages, and incident fluxes. From this sub sample, we identify 28 planets (17% of the sample) with Λ < 20, and thus should exhibit extreme mass-loss rates. We note that all of these systems are old (>1 Gyr). We observe some exceptional cases in system param- eters, extremely low-bulk-density planets (ρp < 0.2 g cm−3) like Kepler-33, Kepler-51, Kepler-79, Kepler-87, or Kepler- 177; and extremely unstable atmospheres (Λ < 5) like Kepler-33 c or Kepler-51 b. 3 HYDRODYNAMIC RUNS In this section we present hydrodynamical models of the upper atmosphere of selected Neptune-like planets, which allow us to directly estimate the present-day hydrodynamic mass-loss rate. We further determine whether their mass- loss rate is higher than the upper-limit XUV-driven mass- loss rate. We covered a range of Λ from 0 to 50, including all hydrogen-dominated atmospheres with Λ < 20, some higher- density planets, and some planets with larger Λ. To compute Lhy, we applied the one-dimensional upper- atmosphere hydrodynamic model of Erkaev et al. (2016). This model solves the hydrodynamic system of equations for mass, momentum, and energy conservation, considering the absorption of stellar XUV flux and accounting for the particles' ionization, dissociation, recombination, and Ly-α cooling4. For the XUV absorption we assume a spherically sym- metric distribution of density, deviations from this symme- try do not seem to be essential. One could expect that differ- ence between 1D and 3D models would be more pronounced 4 See the appendix in Erkaev et al. (2016) for a detailed descrip- tion. MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) An overabundance of low-density Neptunes 3 for cases of larger Jeans escape parameter, when the hy- drodynamic flow is driven mainly by the XUV flux, which may have strong asymmetries. But in such case the mass- loss rate is rather close to the energy-limited escape value, as observed in existing 2D (Khodachenko et al. 2015) and 3D (Tripathi et al. 2015) simulations. For hot Jupiters, our model produces similar mass-loss rates as most other hydrodynamic models (Erkaev et al. 2016). For the Neptune-like planet GJ 436 b, our model pre- dicts a mass-loss rate of 2×10−9 g s−1, consistent with the values from Ehrenreich et al. (2015). As in Tu et al. (2015) and Johnstone et al. (2015), we calculate the stellar X-ray and EUV luminosities using the scaling laws of Wright et al. (2011) to convert the stel- lar rotation rates and masses into X-ray luminosities, and Sanz-Forcada et al. (2011) to convert the X-ray luminosi- ties into EUV luminosities. When the stellar rotation rate is not known, we use the gyrochronological relation of Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008) to convert stellar age into rotation rate. We calculate the upper-limit XUV-driven escape using the energy-limited formula (Watson et al. 1981; Erkaev et al. 2007): Len = πηRp(Reff XUV)2FXUV GMpmHK , (2) with η = 15% the net heating efficiency (Shematovich et al. 2014), Reff XUV the radius where the bulk of the XUV energy is absorbed, and K the potential energy reduction factor due to stellar tides, which depends on the Roche-lobe boundary radius. It is important to remark that both the stellar flux and the planetary parameters vary over their respective lifespan, inducing a variation in the planetary mass-loss rate with time (see, e.g., Lecavelier des Etangs et al. 2004; Lecavelier Des Etangs 2007). In particular, for the boil-off regime, Owen & Wu (2016) argue that the mass-loss rate is exponentially sensitive to the planetary radius at small Λ. Thus, during boil-off, strong cooling and contraction quickly reduce Rp (and hence Lhy) in timescales of ∼ 1 Myr until Λ ∼ 20. The XUV stellar fluxes we compute take into ac- count the age of the star, whereas the planetary radii and masses are taken directly from the reported values. There- fore, the mass-loss rates we compute should be considered as a present-day snapshot of their values. Table A1 and Fig. 2 show the hydrodynamic and energy-limited mass-loss rates for each modeled planet. Note that the estimated Lhy is the total mass-loss rate, including photoevaporation. Thus, we can infer whether photoevapo- ration (Lhy ≈ Len) or boil-off (Lhy ≫ Len) is the dominant mass-loss mechanism. Given the variability of Lhy and Len with the adopted model parameters (FXUV and η), we con- sider that planets with Lhy/Len > 2.5 are in the boil-off regime (Lammer et al. 2016). We confirm that Λ is a good indicator of extreme mass- loss rates (Fig. 2, top panel). For Λ < 15, Lhy/Len is strongly correlated with Λ, exponentially increasing with decreasing Λ. In the intermediate range 15 < Λ < 25, there is a tran- sition from boil off to photoevaporation-dominated mass- loss rate. Then, for Λ > 25, Lhy/Len remains constant as the mass-loss rate is dominated by the XUV-driven pho- toevaporation. We find no significant correlation of Λ with 4 P. Cubillos et al. 0 . 5 5 . 1 10 ) ⊕ R ( i s u d a R 8 6 4 2 0 10 5 . 1 ) ⊕ R ( i s u d a R 8 6 4 2 0 10 ) ⊕ R ( i s u d a R 8 6 4 5 . 1 2 0 0 0.0 1 20.0 30.0 300 K < T < 550 K 0 . 5 0.0 1 550 K < T < 650 K 3 0.0 20.0 0.0 5 0 . 7 0 . 0 8 1 . 6 5 . 1 5.5 1 5 0 . 0 0 . 0 5 0 . 7 1 . 6 8 0 . 0 5.5 1 5 0 . 0 20.0 650 K < T < 800 K 20.0 800 K < T < 950 K 0 . 5 0.0 1 0 . 5 0.0 1 3 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 7 5 1 . 6 8 0 . 0 5.5 1 5 0 . 0 5 . 1 0 . 0 3 0 . 7 0 . 0 5 1 . 6 5.5 8 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 10.0 950 K < T < 1100 K 2 0.0 5.0 5 . 1 5.0 10.0 1100 K < T < 2300 K 0 . 0 3 5.5 0 . 7 1 . 6 5 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 7 1 . 6 0 . 0 3 150.0 5.5 5 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Mass (M⊕) Mass (M⊕) Figure 1. Mass–radius–T eq distribution of the known Neptune-like planets. The blue and green markers denote RV- and TTV-measured masses, respectively. From top to bottom, the brown solid lines denote constant-density curves corresponding to Saturn's, Neptune's, and Earth's bulk density in g cm−3, respectively. The background color contour denotes the value of Λ for the mean equilibrium temperature of the planets in each panel: 455, 600, 715, 870, 1025, and 1440 K. Note that the Λ-contours work only as a guideline, Table A1 gives the specific values for each planet. MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) 102 2e6 n e L / y h L 101 100 10-1 0 104 2e7 102 ) 1 − r y G ⊕ M ( 100 y h L 10-2 10 20 30 40 50 60 20.0 17.5 15.0 12.5 10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 ) ⊕ M ( s s a M 0 10 20 40 50 60 30 Λ Figure 2. Top: Ratio between the hydrodynamic and energy- limited mass-loss rate vs. Λ. The color scale denotes the planetary mass. The background color marks the regions with dominant ex- treme thermal mass-loss rate (gray) and XUV-driven photoevap- oration (white). The labeled triangle denotes the mass-loss values for the extreme case of Kepler-33 c. Bottom: Hydrodynamic mass- loss rate vs. Λ. other observed parameters. Furthermore, 19 of the 27 pre- viously identified planets with hydrogen-dominated atmo- spheres and Λ < 20 satisfy Lhy/Len > 2.5. Six additional low-density planets with Λ ≤ 25 also present an excess mass- loss rate. The bottom panel of Fig. 2 shows the computed hydrodynamic mass-loss rates. All planets with excess mass- loss rates (Lhy/Len > 2.5) show hydrodynamic mass-loss rates above 0.1 M⊕Gyr−1. At this rate, these planets should have already lost their hydrogen atmospheres. The scatter in Lhy (Fig. 2, bottom panel) seems to be mainly correlated with the planetary mass: at a given Λ more massive planets have higher mass-loss rates. On the contrary, the main source for the scatter in Lhy/Len (Fig. 2, top panel) is unclear; these variations seem to be a more complex combination of several factors, e.g., Roche-lobe ra- dius, incident stellar flux, XUV absorption radius, etc. 4 DISCUSSION The observed low bulk densities of many Neptune-like plan- ets require a significant hydrogen envelope fraction. How- ever, their estimated restricted Jeans escape parameter, Λ, and further hydrodynamic modeling indicate that 25 plan- ets in our sample (15%) should be experiencing extremely high mass-loss rates (Lhy > 0.1 M⊕Gyr−1) in excess of the maximum XUV-driven photoevaporation (Lhy/Len > 2.5). Considering the age of the systems (& Gyr), it is im- probable that these Neptunes have retained their hydro- gen envelopes until the present day. In addition, the short timescale of the boil-off regime (. Myr) makes it unlikely that we are observing a transient phenomenon by chance. This contradiction leads us to consider biases on the mass- loss model estimations, the measured physical parameters, or the physical interpretation of the observations. MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) An overabundance of low-density Neptunes 5 4.1 Hydrodynamic-model Bias? Validating model mass-loss rates is challenging because to date there are no direct observational measurements. UV transit observations depend as much on the hydrodynamic models inside the planetary Roche lobe as in the particle dynamics after. This would require a treatment of a number of physical processes that are largely unconstrained (e.g., magnetic fields, stellar radiation pressure, wind-wind inter- action). The heating efficiency rate η is one of the least con- strained parameters in our model, for which we assume a value of 0.15. A detailed calculation of η is complicated, as it varies with altitude and it requires a kinetic approach consid- ering many chemical reactions. Shematovich et al. (2014) es- timated values of η between 0.1 and 0.2 for hot Jupiters. As- suming larger heating efficiency one can increase the mass- loss rates; however, Owen & Jackson (2012) discarded values larger than η = 0.4. Salz et al. (2016) found little variation of the heating efficiency (η ≈ 0.1–0.3) with gravitational potential, except for the most compact and massive planets. One process that we do not consider is magnetic fields. Owen & Adams (2015) found that magnetic fields can suppress mass-loss rates by approximately an order of magnitude by confining the out- flowing material into smaller opening angles around the poles. (2014) and Khodachenko et al. 4.2 Planetary-mass Bias? One explanation to this contradiction is that TTV analy- ses are underestimating the planetary masses, a possibility already considered by Weiss & Marcy (2014). A more mas- sive planet would have a stronger gravitational pull, decreas- ing the mass-loss rate. Steffen (2016) argues that the mass measurements derived from RV and TTV are comparably reliable since the physics behind TTV measurements (grav- ity) is well understood. However, given the complexity and rapid-pace development of exoplanet RV and TTV analy- ses, as data-reduction techniques improve, their mass esti- mations continuously get overturned or refined. For example, TTV-estimated masses for Kepler-114 c (Xie 2014), Kepler- 231 c (Kipping et al. 2014), and Kepler-56 b (Huber et al. 2013) differ by a factor of ten from a nearly contempora- neous estimation (Hadden & Lithwick 2014). Cases of ex- tremely high densities (e.g., Kepler-327 c, ρp ≈ 70 g cm−3 Hadden & Lithwick 2014) or even negative RV-estimated masses (e.g., Marcy et al. 2014) serve as reminders to use the data-reduction and statistical tools with caution. One should incorporate all available prior information (e.g., in a Bayesian posterior sampling) to avoid results at odds with physical principles. In our sample, with the exception of Kepler-94 b, all boil-off planets have TTV-determined masses. Ideally, com- paring the TTV and RV results for a given system would test the reliability of these techniques. However, due to the observing limitations of each method, only a couple of sys- tems have allowed for independent TTV and RV analyses. For example, for the Kepler-89 system, Masuda et al. (2013) found discrepancies between the TTV and RV-mass esti- mations. On the contrary, for the Kepler-18 and WASP- 6 P. Cubillos et al. 47 systems, TTV and RV analyses return consistent results (Cochran et al. 2011; Dai et al. 2015). If we adopted masses such that Λ ≡ 20 (M20, keeping all other parameters fixed), 13 of the 19 low-density extreme- mass-loss planets with Λ < 20.0 would have a mass cor- rection larger than 1σM, with a mean of 5.0σM (see Table 1). 4.3 Planetary-radius Bias? Another possibility is that we are misinterpreting the ob- served transit radius. For clear atmospheres in Neptune- like planets, the observed optical transit radius corre- sponds to the ∼20–100 mbar level (Lopez & Fortney 2014; Lammer et al. 2016). However, if a planet has high-altitude, optically thick clouds/hazes, the transit radius would be overestimating the planetary radius. If this is the case, then the true 100 mbar altitude would correspond to a smaller radius than the observed radius, yielding moder- ate mass-loss rates. Spectroscopic analyses already indicate that many Neptune and sub-Neptune sized planets show flat transmission spectra, consistent with gray opacity hazes or clouds (e.g., Kreidberg et al. 2014; Knutson et al. 2014; Ehrenreich et al. 2014). If we adopted radii such that Λ ≡ 20 (R20, keeping all other parameters fixed), 18 of the 19 low-density boil- off planets with Λ < 20.0 would have a radius correc- tion larger than 1σR, with a mean of 8.5σR (see Table 1). Adopting R20 as the 100 mbar pressure level, we computed hydrostatic-equilibrium pressure–radius profiles to calculate the observed transit photospheric pressure, pphot = p(Rp). Table 1 shows that a third of the planets could have photo- spheres at pressures between 10−3 bar and 10−7 bar, com- patible with the location of cloud decks on exoplanets. When we plot the planetary surface gravity, log g, vs. equilibrium temperature for the planets in our sample (Fig. 3, top panel), we see that all boil-off planets are grouped in the log g < 3.0 region. While it is not surprising that these planets are concentrated at low log g values (given the sim- ilarity in mass and radius dependency of log g ∝ Mp R−2 and Λ ∝ Mp R−1 p ), it is interesting that this region limits closely to the boundary beweeen strong and weak J-band H2O features observed in hot Jupiters, associated to cloudy vs. clear atmospheres, respectively (Stevenson 2016). Re- gardless of whether there is a link between cloud processes on hot Jupiters and Neptune-like planets -two completely different samples-, this graph helps to identify planets with a higher prominence of clouds/hazes. Note that the derived surface gravity of these planets is also affected by the obser- vational biases. Fig. 3 (bottom panel) shows the corrected log g–T eq position of the boil-off planets if we assumed R20 as the 100 mbar radius. p An important remark to highlight is that, while our analysis suggests that boil-off planets can have instead mod- erate mass-loss rates if they have cloudy atmospheres, we cannot claim that the remaining planets have clear atmo- spheres. They can either host clear or cloudy atmospheres. This occurs because our analysis is based on the domi- nant effect of hydrogen in the observed planetary radius. There can be cloudy planets with secondary atmospheres, or even hydrogen-dominated atmospheres hosting lower- Unmodeled Lhy/Len <2.0 Lhy/Len >2.0 Hot-super-Earth desert 2000 ) K ( q e T 1500 1000 500 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 ) K ( q e T 1200 1050 900 750 600 450 300 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 log g (cm s−2 ) 3.5 4.0 Figure 3. Planetary surface gravity vs. equilibrium-temperature. The orange, white, and blue circles (top panel) denote the extreme mass-loss rate, moderate mass-loss rate, and unmodeled planets, respectively. The gray and white background colors denote the region where planets have clear and cloudy-atmospheres, respec- tively, derived by Stevenson (2016) for hot Jupiters. The horizon- tal dashed line denotes the lowest incident-stellar-flux boundary (650 F⊕) of the hot-super-Earth desert (Lundkvist et al. 2016). The bottom panel shows the expected log g of the boil-off plan- ets if their radii were corrected to have Λ ≡ 20.0 (brown circles) relative to their initial position (orange circles). altitude clouds that do not alter much the observed transit radius. 4.4 Bond-albedo Bias? The cloudy-atmospheres scenario has a second consequence on the properties of these planets. The high-altitude cloud/haze layer would reflect a larger fraction of the in- cident stellar irradiation, decreasing the amount of energy deposited in the atmosphere, and consequently decreasing the estimated mass-loss rates. Low-density sub Neptunes (on average) would then differ from hot Jupiters. Studies of the aggregate sample of hot Jupiters show low geometric opti- cal albedos (Ag ≈ 0.1) and somewhat higher Bond albedos (AB = 0.4 ± 0.1, Schwartz & Cowan 2015), suggesting that hot Jupiters have a layer of optical absorbers above an infra- red reflective cloud deck. Our cloudy-atmosphere case aligns well with the higher geometric albedos (Ag ≈ 0.16 − 0.3) found on super-Earth planets (Rp < 2.5R⊕, Demory 2014). Table 1 shows the required values of the Bond albedo such that Λ ≡ 20.0 (A20, keeping all other parameters fixed). Most of the planets in this list would require Bond albedos higher than any observed value from solar or extrasolar gas- giant planet. If we confirm the cloudy nature of these atmo- MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) Table 1. Low-density boil-off planet parameters. Λ, Mp, Rp, and T eq are as in Table A1. M20, R20, and A20 are the modified mass, radius, and bond albedo such that Λ = 20. pphot is the photospheric pressure corresponding to Rp when we adopt R20 as the 100 mbar pressure level. An overabundance of low-density Neptunes 7 Planet name Λ Kepler-11 c Kepler-11 f Kepler-114 d Kepler-177 b Kepler-177 c Kepler-254 c Kepler-29 b Kepler-29 c Kepler-305 c Kepler-307 b Kepler-307 c Kepler-33 c Kepler-33 d Kepler-51 b Kepler-51 c Kepler-51 d Kepler-79 d Kepler-79 e Kepler-87 c 8.8 10.3 18.1 7.6 13.7 13.7 11.7 12.0 17.2 8.5 5.2 1.7 7.1 4.2 7.7 15.1 10.1 16.4 17.7 Mp M⊕ 2.86+2.86 −1.59 1.91±0.95 3.81±1.59 1.91+0.64 −0.32 7.63+3.50 −3.18 3.20+3.70 −2.70 4.50±1.50 4.00±1.30 6.04+2.54 −2.22 3.18±0.64 1.59+0.64 −0.32 0.80+2.50 −0.70 4.70±2.00 2.22+1.59 −0.95 4.13±0.32 7.63±0.95 6.04+2.10 −1.59 4.13+1.21 −1.11 6.40±0.80 M20 M⊕ 6.5 3.7 4.2 5.0 11.1 4.7 7.7 6.6 7.0 7.4 6.1 9.4 13.3 10.5 10.8 10.1 12.0 5.0 7.2 Rp R⊕ 2.87+0.04 −0.06 2.49+0.04 −0.07 2.54±0.28 2.91+1.53 −0.30 7.10+3.71 −0.72 2.09+0.84 −0.16 3.35±0.22 3.14±0.20 3.30+0.82 −0.33 3.20+1.20 −0.46 2.81+1.05 −0.42 3.20±0.30 5.35±0.49 7.10±0.30 9.01+2.81 −1.71 9.71±0.50 7.17+0.13 −0.16 3.49±0.13 6.15±0.09 R20 R⊕ 1.26 1.29 2.30 1.10 4.87 1.44 1.95 1.89 2.83 1.36 0.74 0.27 1.89 1.50 3.45 7.34 3.61 2.87 5.46 pphot bar 6.8 × 10−13 2.4 × 10−11 1.4 × 10−03 4.7 × 10−14 5.5 × 10−08 5.5 × 10−08 5.0 × 10−10 1.2 × 10−09 1.4 × 10−04 4.1 × 10−13 2.3 × 10−16 6.7 × 10−20 1.3 × 10−14 2.3 × 10−17 5.3 × 10−14 1.3 × 10−06 1.4 × 10−11 2.7 × 10−05 5.1 × 10−04 T eq K 859 562 628 655 594 845 872 802 808 883 818 1113 941 561 453 394 633 546 444 A20 0.96 0.93 0.32 0.98 0.78 0.78 0.88 0.87 0.46 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.67 0.94 0.54 0.38 spheres, this analysis places strong constraints on the at- mospheric properties of the ensemble of low-density sub Neptunes. These planets would present high-altitude opaque clouds/hazes that increase the observed radii. Observation- ally, the value of their restricted Jeans escape parameter Λ, and also their position in the log g–T eq plane, would be sim- ple and direct indicators of the cloud/haze prominence on the atmospheres of these planets. On a different but still interesting topic, the dis- tribution of planets in the log g–T eq plane (Fig. 3 top panel) agrees well with the proposed hot-super-Earth desert (Lundkvist et al. 2016). The boundary at 650 times the in- cident flux on Earth (F⊕) directly translates into an equilib- rium temperature of ∼ 1400 K. From the planets with known mass and radius, we observe a dearth of planets above this line. Unlike the Rp–F⊕ figure from Lundkvist et al. (2016), this figure further constrains the parameter space of the planetary physical properties of the desert by adding infor- mation from the masses (through the surface gravity). Furthermore, by considering the boil-off mass-loss regime, our results (Fig. 3 bottom panel) suggest that the exoplanet desert extends even further. Be it the mass or the radius of the planets being misinterpreted, boil-off planets should have a higher surface gravity, further depleting a re- gion below the Teq = 1400 K boundary, down to ∼ 600 K. 5 CONCLUSIONS We studied the mass-loss rates of the sample of 167 con- firmed planets with masses Mp < 30M⊕. For 15% of the planets in this sample, we found that their planetary MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) mass, radius, and equilibrium temperature lead to para- doxical results. Their observed low bulk densities imply hydrogen-dominated atmospheres. However, hydrodynami- cal models indicate extremely high mass-loss rates (Lhy > 0.1 M⊕Gyr−1), thus being unable to retain their hydrogen envelopes (boil-off regime). Our hydrodynamical models' mass-loss rates agree well with state-of-the-art models from the literature. Unfortu- nately, current observations do not offer a direct, model- independent validation of escape rates. Magnetic fields (how- ever largely unknown) could offer a solution of this paradox by decreasing the predicted mass-loss rates (Owen & Adams 2014; Khodachenko et al. 2015). Alternatively, the boil-off timescales of ∼ 106 yr (Owen & Wu 2016) could have been grossly underestimated. We need more detailed studies of the mass-loss time evolution during the boil-off regime. If the model mass-loss estimations are correct, we hy- pothesize that either the TTV studies are underestimat- ing the planetary masses or that these planets have high- altitude clouds/hazes producing overestimated transit radii, high albedos, or both. The cloudy/hazy scenario is further supported by the higher albedo found for super Earths, and a similar correlation as that between log g–T eq and clear/cloudy atmospheres for hot Jupiters. Whether we are misinterpreting their observed tran- sit radii or underestimating their TTV masses, a fraction of ∼10–20% Neptunes with biased parameters will have a large impact on the population studies of the mass–radius relationship. Both empirical laws and physically motivated models tracing the observed mass-radius distribution of Nep- tunes would be disrupted by this sub-sample, simply because the observed values are not representative of the underlying 8 P. Cubillos et al. properties of exoplanets. This could explain, for example, why studies like Wolfgang & Lopez (2015) do not find a di- rect mass–radius relationship for sub Neptune planets. In the future, population studies should consider the added com- plexity introduced by this rather large sub-sample of planets. Conclusively solving this puzzle involves a multitude of studies, from the confirmation of low-densities with RV measurements, to the consistent modeling of high-altitude clouds/hazes. This study generates many open questions for the future, for example, can clouds/hazes form and remain at such high altitudes and under strong stellar irradiation con- ditions? Or how do reflective clouds affect the atmospheric albedo, and hence mass loss? ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank contributors to SciPy, Matplotlib (Hunter 2007), the Python Programming Language, and contributors to the free and open-source community. We thank the anonymous referee for comments that significantly improved the qual- ity of the paper. This research has made use of the Ex- oplanet Orbit Database and the Exoplanet Data Explorer at exoplanets.org and the NASA Exoplanet Archive, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology, un- der contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration under the Exoplanet Exploration Program. We acknowledge the Austrian Forschungsforderungsgesellschaft FFG projects "RASEN" P847963 and "TAPAS4CHEOPS" P853993, the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) NFN projects S11607-N16 and S11604-N16, and the FWF project P27256- N27. N.V.E. acknowledges support by the RFBR grant No. 15-05-00879-a and No. 16-52-14006 ANF-a. REFERENCES Almenara J. M., et al., 2015, A&A, 581, L7 Alonso R., et al., 2014, A&A, 567, A112 Bakos G. ´A., et al., 2010, ApJ, 710, 1724 Barros S. C. C., et al., 2014, A&A, 569, A74 Barros S. C. C., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 454, 4267 Becker J. C., Vanderburg A., Adams F. C., Rappaport S. A., Schwengeler H. M., 2015, ApJ, 812, L18 Ben-Jaffel L., Ballester G. E., 2013, A&A, 553, A52 Berta-Thompson Z. K., et al., 2015, Nature, 527, 204 Biddle L. I., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1810 Borucki W. J., et al., 2010, ApJ, 713, L126 Bourrier V., Lecavelier des Etangs A., Ehrenreich D., Tanaka Y. A., Vidotto A. A., 2016, A&A, 591, A121 Carter J. A., et al., 2012, Science, 337, 556 Chamberlain J. W., Hunten D. M., 1987, Theory of planetary atmospheres. An introduction to their physics andchemistry. Christie D., Arras P., Li Z.-Y., 2016, ApJ, 820, 3 Cochran W. D., et al., 2011, ApJS, 197, 7 Dai F., et al., 2015, ApJ, 813, L9 Demory B.-O., 2014, ApJ, 789, L20 Demory B.-O., et al., 2011, A&A, 533, A114 Dressing C. D., Charbonneau D., 2015, ApJ, 807, 45 Dressing C. D., et al., 2015, ApJ, 800, 135 Ehrenreich D., et al., 2014, A&A, 570, A89 Ehrenreich D., et al., 2015, Nature, 522, 459 Erkaev N. V., Kulikov Y. N., Lammer H., Selsis F., Langmayr D., Erkaev N. V., Lammer H., Odert P., Kislyakova K. G., John- stone C. P., Gudel M., Khodachenko M. L., 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1300 Espinoza N., et al., 2016, ApJ, 830, 43 Fossati L., et al., 2010, ApJ, 714, L222 Fossati L., Erkaev N. V., Lammer H., Cubillos P., Juvan I., Kislyakova K. G., Lendl M., Odert P., 2016, A&A, Submitted. Fressin F., et al., 2013, ApJ, 766, 81 Gautier III T. N., et al., 2012, ApJ, 749, 15 Gettel S., et al., 2016, ApJ, 816, 95 Gilliland R. L., et al., 2013, ApJ, 766, 40 Ginzburg S., Schlichting H. E., Sari R., 2016, ApJ, 825, 29 Guillot T., Burrows A., Hubbard W. B., Lunine J. I., Saumon D., 1996, ApJ, 459, L35 Hadden S., Lithwick Y., 2014, ApJ, 787, 80 Hadden S., Lithwick Y., 2016, ApJ, 828, 44 Han E., Wang S. X., Wright J. T., Feng Y. K., Zhao M., Fakhouri O., Brown J. I., Hancock C., 2014, PASP, 126, 827 Harpsøe K. B. W., et al., 2013, A&A, 549, A10 Hartman J. D., et al., 2011, ApJ, 728, 138 Holmstrom M., Ekenback A., Selsis F., Penz T., Lammer H., Wurz P., 2008, Nature, 451, 970 Huber D., et al., 2013, Science, 342, 331 Hunter J. D., 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90 Inamdar N. K., Schlichting H. E., 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1751 Johnstone C. P., et al., 2015, ApJ, 815, L12 Jontof-Hutter D., Lissauer J. J., Rowe J. F., Fabrycky D. C., 2014, ApJ, 785, 15 Jontof-Hutter D., Rowe J. F., Lissauer J. J., Fabrycky D. C., Ford E. B., 2015, Nature, 522, 321 Jontof-Hutter D., et al., 2016, ApJ, 820, 39 Khodachenko M. L., Shaikhislamov I. F., Lammer H., Prokopov P. A., 2015, ApJ, 813, 50 Kipping D. M., Nesvorn´y D., Buchhave L. A., Hartman J., Bakos G. ´A., Schmitt A. R., 2014, ApJ, 784, 28 Kislyakova K. G., Holmstrom M., Lammer H., Odert P., Kho- dachenko M. L., 2014, Science, 346, 981 Knutson H. A., Benneke B., Deming D., Homeier D., 2014, Nature, 505, 66 Koskinen T. T., Harris M. J., Yelle R. V., Lavvas P., 2013a, Icarus, 226, 1678 Koskinen T. T., Yelle R. V., Harris M. J., Lavvas P., 2013b, Icarus, 226, 1695 Kreidberg L., et al., 2014, Nature, 505, 69 Kulow J. R., France K., Linsky J., Loyd R. O. P., 2014, ApJ, 786, 132 Lammer H., et al., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1605.03595) Lecavelier Des Etangs A., 2007, A&A, 461, 1185 Lecavelier des Etangs A., Vidal-Madjar A., McConnell J. C., H´ebrard G., 2004, A&A, 418, L1 Lecavelier des Etangs A., Pont F., Vidal-Madjar A., Sing D., 2008, A&A, 481, L83 Lee E. J., Chiang E., Ormel C. W., 2014, ApJ, 797, 95 Linsky J. L., Yang H., France K., Froning C. S., Green J. C., Stocke J. T., Osterman S. N., 2010, ApJ, 717, 1291 Lissauer J. J., et al., 2013, ApJ, 770, 131 Llama J., Vidotto A. A., Jardine M., Wood K., Fares R., Gombosi T. I., 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2179 Lopez E. D., Fortney J. J., 2014, ApJ, 792, 1 Lopez E. D., Fortney J. J., Miller N., 2012, ApJ, 761, 59 Lundkvist M. S., et al., 2016, Nature Communications, 7, 11201 Maciejewski G., Niedzielski A., Nowak G., Pall´e E., Tingley B., Errmann R., Neuhauser R., 2014, Acta Astronomica, 64, 323 Mamajek E. E., Hillenbrand L. A., 2008, ApJ, 687, 1264 Marcy G. W., et al., 2014, ApJS, 210, 20 Masuda K., 2014, ApJ, 783, 53 Masuda K., Hirano T., Taruya A., Nagasawa M., Suto Y., 2013, Jaritz G. F., Biernat H. K., 2007, A&A, 472, 329 ApJ, 778, 185 MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) An overabundance of low-density Neptunes 9 McQuillan A., Mazeh T., Aigrain S., 2013, ApJ, 775, L11 Morton T. D., Bryson S. T., Coughlin J. L., Rowe J. F., Ravichan- dran G., Petigura E. A., Haas M. R., Batalha N. M., 2016, ApJ, 822, 86 Motalebi F., et al., 2015, A&A, 584, A72 Moutou C., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2783 Nesvorn´y D., Kipping D., Terrell D., Hartman J., Bakos G. ´A., Buchhave L. A., 2013, ApJ, 777, 3 Ofir A., Dreizler S., Zechmeister M., Husser T.-O., 2014, A&A, 561, A103 Owen J. E., Adams F. C., 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3761 Owen J. E., Jackson A. P., 2012, MNRAS, 425, 2931 Owen J. E., Wu Y., 2013, ApJ, 775, 105 Owen J. E., Wu Y., 2016, ApJ, 817, 107 Pepe F., et al., 2013, Nature, 503, 377 Petigura E. A., et al., 2016, ApJ, 818, 36 Salz M., Schneider P. C., Czesla S., Schmitt J. H. M. M., 2016, A&A, 585, L2 Sanchis-Ojeda R., et al., 2012, Nature, 487, 449 Sanz-Forcada J., Micela G., Ribas I., Pollock A. M. T., Eiroa C., Velasco A., Solano E., Garc´ıa- ´Alvarez D., 2011, A&A, 532, A6 Schmitt J. R., et al., 2014, ApJ, 795, 167 Schneider J., Le Sidaner P., Savalle R., Zolotukhin I., 2012, in Ballester P., Egret D., Lorente N. P. F., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 461, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXI. p. 447 Schwartz J. C., Cowan N. B., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 4192 Shematovich V. I., Ionov D. E., Lammer H., 2014, A&A, 571, A94 Steffen J. H., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4384 Stevenson K. B., 2016, ApJ, 817, L16 Stokl A., Dorfi E., Lammer H., 2015, A&A, 576, A87 Stokl A., Dorfi E. A., Johnstone C. P., Lammer H., 2016, ApJ, 825, 86 Stone J. M., Proga D., 2009, ApJ, 694, 205 Tremblin P., Chiang E., 2013, MNRAS, 428, 2565 Tripathi A., Kratter K. M., Murray-Clay R. A., Krumholz M. R., 2015, ApJ, 808, 173 Tu L., Johnstone C. P., Gudel M., Lammer H., 2015, A&A, 577, L3 Van Grootel V., et al., 2014, ApJ, 786, 2 Vanderburg A., et al., 2015, ApJ, 800, 59 Vidal-Madjar A., Lecavelier des Etangs A., D´esert J.-M., Ballester G. E., Ferlet R., H´ebrard G., Mayor M., 2003, Nature, 422, 143 Watson A. J., Donahue T. M., Walker J. C. G., 1981, Icarus, 48, 150 Weiss L. M., Marcy G. W., 2014, ApJ, 783, L6 Weiss L. M., et al., 2013, ApJ, 768, 14 Weiss L. M., et al., 2016, ApJ, 819, 83 Wolfgang A., Lopez E., 2015, ApJ, 806, 183 Wright N. J., Drake J. J., Mamajek E. E., Henry G. W., 2011, ApJ, 743, 48 Xie J.-W., 2013, ApJS, 208, 22 Xie J.-W., 2014, ApJS, 210, 25 APPENDIX A: PARAMETERS OF THE KNOWN NEPTUNE PLANETS Table A1 list the observed and derived parameters for the known sample of Neptune-like planets. This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author. MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) 10 P. Cubillos et al. Table A1. Observed and derived parameters for the sub-Neptune planet sample. This table only includes planets with estimated mass (Mp) and transit radius (Rp), with Mp < 30M⊕. The equilibrium temperature (T eq) assumes zero Bond albedo and efficient day–night energy redistribution. The restricted Jeans escape parameter (Λ) comes from Eq. (1). The planetary mean density (ρp) assumes the observed mass and transit radius. FXUV (section 3) is the stellar XUV-flux received by the planet for the given orbital semi-major axis (a), stellar mass (Ms), age, and rotational angular velocity (Ωrot). Lhy and Len (section 3) are the hydrodynamic and energy-limited XUV-driven (Len) mass-loss rates of the selected hydrodynamic-modeled planets (mostly low-density planets with Λ < 20). 305 180.8 545 101.6 Λ 15.6 18.6 60.8 15.6 36.1 42.7 18.4 35.3 38.5 62.9 47.6 22.6 20.6 34.0 50.8 34.1 61.3 26.0 8.9 78.8 32.9 35.0 50.3 23.4 45.5 11.6 26.8 36.8 56.5 8.6 8.8 24.9 22.6 10.3 58.1 18.9 18.1 45.5 Name 55 Cnc e CoRoT-22 b CoRoT-24 c Mp M⊕ Rp R⊕ Teq K 2.08±0.16 1957 8.38±0.39 4.88+0.17 12.08+13.99 −0.39 −8.90 27.97±11.12 4.94±0.45 1007 706 CoRoT-7 b 5.72±0.95 1.58±0.07 1760 EPIC 2037 b 21.01±5.40 5.69±0.56 EPIC 2037 c 27.00±6.90 7.83±0.72 GJ 1132 b GJ 1214 b 1.62±0.54 1.16±0.11 6.36±0.95 2.28±0.08 GJ 3470 b 13.67±1.59 3.88±0.33 GJ 436 b 22.25±2.22 4.17±0.17 776 612 578 599 692 642 HAT-P-11 b 25.75±2.86 HAT-P-26 b 18.75±2.22 K2-3 b K2-19 c HD 97658 b HD 219134 b 4.46±0.47 7.63+0.95 −0.64 HIP 116454 b 11.76±1.27 15.90+7.70 −2.80 8.40±2.10 2.10+2.10 −1.30 11.10±3.50 16.30+6.00 −6.10 3.72±0.42 Kepler-10 b K2-56 b K2-3 d K2-3 c Kepler-10 c 13.98±1.79 Kepler-100 b 7.31±3.18 866 994 4.74±0.16 6.34+0.81 −0.36 1.61±0.09 1022 2.24+0.10 −0.09 2.54±0.18 758 691 500 371 783 4.51±0.47 2.08+0.18 −0.09 1.65+0.16 −0.07 1.53±0.11 2.23+0.14 −0.11 1.48+0.04 −0.03 2.36+0.09 −0.04 1.32±0.04 1271 2129 570 Kepler-102 d 3.81±1.91 1.18±0.04 Kepler-102 e 8.90±1.91 2.22±0.07 701 604 Kepler-103 b 9.85±8.58 Kepler-104 b 19.60+14.50 −12.40 3.70±2.00 Kepler-105 b 946 3.38±0.09 3.13+0.52 −0.70 2.22±0.11 1088 1043 993 863 583 931 859 714 636 562 844 714 628 613 Kepler-105 c 4.60±0.90 1.31±0.07 Kepler-106 c 10.49±3.18 2.50±0.33 Kepler-106 e Kepler-11 b Kepler-11 c Kepler-11 d Kepler-11 e Kepler-11 f 11.12±5.72 1.91+1.27 −0.95 2.86+2.86 −1.59 7.31+0.95 −1.59 7.95+1.59 −2.22 1.91±0.95 Kepler-113 b 11.76±4.13 2.56±0.33 1.81+0.03 −0.04 2.87+0.04 −0.06 3.12+0.06 −0.07 4.20+0.07 −0.09 2.49+0.04 −0.07 1.82±0.04 Kepler-114 c 2.86±0.64 1.60±0.18 Kepler-120 b Kepler-114 d 3.81±1.59 8.50+9.70 −7.50 27.70+11.40 −9.80 Kepler-131 b 16.21±3.50 Kepler-122 e Kepler-131 c 8.26±6.04 Kepler-136 b 19.80+11.70 −10.40 0.07+0.06 Kepler-138 b −0.04 1.97+1.91 −1.12 0.64+0.67 −0.39 Kepler-138 d Kepler-138 c 2.54±0.28 2.31±0.37 2.02+0.70 −0.19 2.41±0.20 0.84±0.07 1.80+0.35 −0.17 0.53±0.03 1.20±0.07 1.21±0.08 ρp a Ms Age Ωrot FXUV g cm-3 AU M⊙ Gyr Ω⊙ erg s-1 cm-2 Lhy s−1 Len s−1 Lhy/Len Ref.a,b 5.14 0.015 0.91 10.2 0.57 0.092 1.10 3.3 1.28 0.098 0.91 11.0 7.97 0.017 0.91 0.63 0.154 1.12 0.31 0.247 1.12 5.79 0.015 0.18 2.97 0.014 0.18 1.29 0.031 0.51 1.69 0.029 0.47 1.34 0.053 0.81 0.41 0.048 0.82 1.3 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 2.5 6.0 6.5 9.0 5.94 0.038 0.79 12.5 3.72 0.080 0.77 3.98 0.091 0.78 0.96 0.100 0.95 5.18 0.077 0.61 2.58 0.141 0.61 17.22 0.209 0.61 8.11 0.241 0.96 6.31 0.017 0.91 5.89 0.240 0.91 17.37 0.073 1.08 12.86 0.086 0.81 4.47 0.117 0.81 1.41 0.128 1.09 3.53 0.094 0.81 1.87 0.060 0.96 11.28 0.072 0.96 3.69 0.111 1.00 3.66 0.243 1.00 1.78 0.091 0.96 0.67 0.107 0.96 1.33 0.155 0.96 0.59 0.195 0.96 0.68 0.250 0.96 10.80 0.050 0.75 3.82 0.065 0.56 1.29 0.083 0.56 3.80 0.055 0.59 6.0 2.0 · · · 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 9.1 9.1 6.9 4.1 4.1 6.0 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.3 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 3.2 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.9 3.7 3.7 2.8 4.7 4.7 4.7 1.4 1.9 1.3 2.3 0.4 0.4 5.2 5.2 · · · 0.3 1.1 1.2 0.3 0.4 1.5 0.5 · · · · · · · · · 1.9 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.4 0.4 0.9 · · · 1.6 1.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.9 · · · · · · 0.2 0.2 · · · 1.4 1.4 1.4 · · · 173333.5 10959.0 3.4×1035 1.4×1035 2429.9 · · · · · · · · · 293392.3 231.6 90.0 156736.6 181777.4 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 5353.9 699.6 1.3×1033 8.9×1033 5944.9 2.7×1034 2.4×1034 12237.8 4.4×1035 2.4×1035 926.6 485.1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 4879.7 540.3 6.4×1033 3.2×1033 1232.2 · · · · · · · · · 374.9 170.1 1517.7 124224.8 639.6 14282.2 302.8 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 166.5 2165.8 3.1×1034 9.0×1033 5720.3 17615.2 3.8×1035 2.1×1035 12198.6 · · · · · · · · · · · · 68.5 · · · · · · · · · · · · 14.3 175.8 2.2×1035 8.7×1033 127.2 4.0×1035 1.5×1034 60.6 3.6×1032 3.5×1032 38.3 2.0×1033 4.9×1032 23.3 8.4×1034 2.8×1033 635.2 · · · · · · · · · 4657.9 2796.6 6.1×1034 1.8×1034 1524.5 · · · · · · · · · 1104.9 79.2 42.9 12210.7 2705.8 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1838.5 924.8 8.4×1034 1.2×1034 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · De11R · · · 2.3 Mou14R · · · Alo14R Ba14R · · · Pet15R Pet15R BT15R Ha13R Bi14R · · · 0.1 Mac14R 1.1 Bak10R Ha11R 1.8 · · · Mot15R · · · VG14R V15R · · · 2.0 Ba15R,T · · · Alm15R · · · Alm15R · · · Alm15R E16R · · · · · · W16R · · · W16R · · · Mar14R · · · Mar14R · · · Mar14R 3.4 Mar14R HL14T · · · 1.8 JH15bT JH15bT · · · · · · Mar14R · · · Mar14R L13T 25.3 L13T L13T L13T L13T 30.0 · · · Mar14R X14T · · · X14T HL14T HL14T · · · · · · Mar14R · · · Mar14R HL14T · · · JH15aT JH15aT · · · 7.1 JH15aT 26.7 3.4 1.0 4.1 · · · · · · MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) 676 153.8 18.53 0.227 0.99 785 64.9 6.37 0.126 1.02 673 110.6 76.46 0.171 1.02 1060 78.6 18.72 0.106 1.20 449 408 343 2.1 30.5 11.6 2.51 0.075 0.52 6.28 0.090 0.52 1.98 0.128 0.52 Table A1 – continued Sub-Neptune Planet Parameters. An overabundance of low-density Neptunes 11 ρp FXUV g cm−3 AU M⊙ Gyr Ω⊙ erg s-1 cm-2 a Ms Age Ωrot Λ 50.1 56.6 91.4 79.2 7.6 13.7 20.7 23.9 22.6 49.4 9.28 0.054 0.77 9.95 0.068 0.77 7.56 0.102 0.83 5.56 0.163 0.83 0.43 0.222 1.07 0.12 0.270 1.07 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.4 4.84 0.045 0.97 10.7 0.57 0.075 0.97 10.7 0.27 0.117 0.97 10.7 6.55 0.141 0.87 990 793 693 1197 836 898 590 121.5 9.06 0.137 0.84 32.0 28.5 47.8 63.1 15.71 0.090 0.92 6.82 0.045 0.91 3.08 0.093 0.91 6.86 0.062 0.97 652 117.1 10.16 0.185 0.77 652 942 88.4 45.3 6.66 0.272 1.15 4.33 0.059 0.72 1108 105.3 34.86 0.047 0.86 47.5 61.1 44.1 26.5 79.8 77.6 12.22 0.075 1.11 9.12 0.124 1.11 4.48 0.074 0.51 2.51 0.114 0.51 9.24 0.272 1.06 6.71 0.140 0.88 993 462 372 635 640 489 101.1 3.28 0.202 0.80 20.6 34.8 13.7 29.9 41.6 49.0 64.4 75.4 30.6 45.9 40.8 23.2 11.7 12.0 36.7 56.4 23.8 17.2 8.5 5.2 72.7 53.2 65.1 48.5 25.3 2.65 0.070 1.19 0.96 0.113 1.19 1.93 0.105 0.97 1.31 0.085 0.54 1.70 0.107 0.54 0.32 0.191 0.65 3.71 0.203 1.10 4.05 0.269 1.10 1.93 0.062 0.75 2.83 0.081 0.75 4.03 0.210 1.08 1.18 0.330 1.08 0.66 0.092 0.98 0.71 0.109 0.98 1.05 0.186 0.99 0.19 0.534 0.99 1.24 0.056 0.76 0.93 0.073 0.76 0.54 0.093 0.98 0.40 0.108 0.98 1.56 0.260 1.21 4.55 0.050 0.54 5.15 0.090 0.54 4.42 0.051 0.98 2.72 0.066 0.98 Name Mp M⊕ Rp R⊕ Teq K 948 Kepler-161 b 12.10+7.40 −6.30 Kepler-161 c 11.80+10.50 −7.50 Kepler-176 c 23.00+13.50 −8.00 Kepler-176 d 15.20+10.40 −5.80 1.91+0.64 Kepler-177 b −0.32 7.63+3.50 −3.18 6.99±3.50 2.00±0.10 1284 1.93+0.31 −0.14 1.87+0.30 −0.14 2.56+0.93 −0.26 2.47+0.90 −0.25 2.91+1.53 −0.30 7.10+3.71 −0.72 Kepler-177 c Kepler-18 b 655 594 589 745 844 1.90±0.06 1277 1.23±0.04 1021 Kepler-18 c 17.16±1.91 5.50±0.26 −0.34 −1.09 −0.18 Kepler-20 b Kepler-18 d 16.53±1.27 6.99±0.33 1.95+0.84 8.80+7.40 Kepler-184 c −0.19 −5.70 −10.60 2.40+0.52 Kepler-189 c 22.70+17.10 5.30+3.30 Kepler-197 c −2.90 8.58±2.22 1.91+0.12 −0.21 3.07+0.20 16.21+3.18 Kepler-20 c −0.31 −3.81 Kepler-211 c 18.30+22.40 −17.00 2.45+1.62 −11.90 2.34+0.44 Kepler-215 d 23.60+17.30 −17.70 2.51+0.63 Kepler-219 d 19.10+29.90 −0.40 2.68+0.61 Kepler-221 c 15.10+10.10 −0.26 −6.70 −10.10 1.56+0.58 Kepler-226 b 24.00+11.80 15.20+3.20 Kepler-23 b −2.90 17.60+13.70 −11.90 2.20±0.07 1.82+0.26 4.90+1.80 −0.25 −1.30 2.20+1.50 1.69+0.24 Kepler-231 c −0.23 −1.10 2.00+0.85 Kepler-238 f 13.35+2.86 −0.17 −2.54 −13.00 2.32+0.83 Kepler-244 d 15.20+20.00 −12.10 3.31+1.40 Kepler-245 d 21.60+16.60 Kepler-25 b Kepler-231 b Kepler-23 d −0.18 −0.37 −0.12 9.60±4.20 2.71±0.05 1305 Kepler-25 c Kepler-254 c Kepler-26 b 24.60±5.70 5.21±0.09 1029 2.09+0.84 3.20+3.70 −0.16 −2.70 5.10±0.70 2.78±0.11 845 465 Kepler-26 c 6.20±0.70 2.72±0.12 7.17+0.38 21.20+3.20 Kepler-27 c −0.27 −3.70 2.91+1.27 Kepler-276 c 16.53+4.45 −0.28 −3.50 2.81+1.23 Kepler-276 d 16.21+5.09 −0.27 −4.45 8.80+3.80 Kepler-28 b 2.93±0.46 −3.10 10.90+6.10 −4.50 7.31±6.67 2.15±0.10 Kepler-289 b Kepler-28 c 2.77±0.44 Kepler-289 d 4.13±0.95 2.68±0.17 Kepler-29 b 4.50±1.50 3.35±0.22 Kepler-29 c 4.00±1.30 3.14±0.20 Kepler-30 b 11.30±1.40 3.90±0.20 Kepler-307 c Kepler-307 b 23.10±2.70 8.79±0.50 Kepler-30 d 3.60+0.90 Kepler-305 b 10.49+2.54 −0.36 −1.91 6.04+2.54 3.30+0.82 Kepler-305 c −2.22 −0.33 3.18±0.64 3.20+1.20 −0.46 2.81+1.05 1.59+0.64 −0.42 −0.32 29.50+9.60 4.71+2.23 −7.00 −0.57 9.40+3.60 2.25±0.11 −3.10 7.70+5.00 Kepler-32 c −3.80 Kepler-326 c 17.40+15.40 6.90+8.50 Kepler-326 d −5.90 2.02±0.11 −10.70 2.79+1.96 −1.31 2.41+1.70 −1.13 Kepler-32 b Kepler-31 c MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) 415 457 669 581 743 650 630 502 872 802 599 353 927 808 883 818 653 595 443 974 856 Lhy s−1 · · · · · · · · · Len s−1 · · · · · · · · · 7681.3 4844.0 1567.5 · · · 613.8 962.8 4.1×1036 2.0×1035 651.5 5.8×1035 1.0×1035 · · · · · · · · · 46258.8 16344.6 3.3×1035 2.1×1035 6729.1 3.5×1035 1.9×1035 1017.7 · · · · · · 497.7 3777.0 732.8 174.6 12588.9 2352.6 1158.9 70313.6 7076.1 8385.5 3067.7 2185.7 921.0 507.0 720.1 987.3 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 92614.7 35845.4 1.6×1035 1.7×1035 2984.8 9.1×1034 2.9×1034 5260.6 2.7×1034 2.8×1034 3338.5 5.8×1033 1.7×1034 222.8 · · · · · · 1237.2 704.2 7830.8 4587.9 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 4490.4 1818.4 4.1×1034 1.9×1034 13666.1 1.3×1036 4.0×1035 9778.1 8.9×1035 2.8×1035 718.8 7.5×1033 4.3×1033 86.7 · · · · · · 3742.0 5.1×1034 2.4×1034 2158.9 8.0×1034 2.5×1034 11054.6 3.9×1036 9.5×1035 8159.4 9.8×1037 1.2×1036 1108.1 · · · · · · 2232.3 689.0 · · · · · · · · · · · · 34240.8 20445.5 4.7×1034 6.1×1034 · · · · · · Lhy/Len Ref.a,b 20.5 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · HL14T HL14T HL14T HL14T X14T X14T 5.8 · · · Co11R,T 1.6 Co11R,T 1.8 Co11R,T HL14T · · · HL14T HL14T Ga12R Ga12R HL14T HL14T HL14T HL14T HL14T HL14T HL14T K14T K14T X14T HL14T HL14T · · · · · · Mar14R 0.9 Mar14R 3.1 HL14T 1.0 JH15bT 0.3 JH15bT HL14T · · · X14T X14T HL14T HL14T S14T S14T 2.2 3.3 JH15bT 3.2 JH15bT SO12T 1.7 SO12T X14T X14T X14T X14T HL14T HL14T HL14T HL14T · · · 0.8 HL14T 3.2 2.1 4.1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 81.7 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 · · · · · · 1.9 1.9 1.9 · · · · · · · · · 0.2 0.2 2.0 · · · 1.6 2.9 · · · · · · · · · 1.2 1.2 · · · · · · 1.4 3.9 3.9 1.1 2.0 2.0 0.5 · · · · · · 1.5 1.5 3.0 3.0 2.3 2.3 1.1 1.1 · · · · · · 2.0 2.0 · · · 0.8 0.8 2.8 2.8 4.5 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.2 1.6 1.6 4.6 4.6 4.4 6.6 6.6 3.5 3.5 6.8 4.8 3.6 2.9 2.9 4.0 3.0 3.0 1.6 3.8 3.8 2.2 2.2 3.8 3.8 · · · · · · 1.6 1.6 4.4 4.4 6.6 6.6 4.2 2.7 2.7 4.7 4.7 12 P. Cubillos et al. Table A1 – continued Sub-Neptune Planet Parameters. Name Mp M⊕ Rp R⊕ Teq K Λ ρp FXUV g cm−3 AU M⊙ Gyr Ω⊙ erg s-1 cm-2 a Ms Age Ωrot Lhy s−1 Len s−1 Lhy/Len Ref.a,b −0.24 4.03±0.38 Kepler-33 e Kepler-33 d 941 830 762 3.20±0.30 1113 −17.70 1.18±0.11 −12.40 2.30+0.97 Kepler-327 c 20.30+27.10 Kepler-328 b 28.61+13.03 0.80+2.50 Kepler-33 c −0.70 4.70±2.00 5.35±0.49 6.70+1.20 −1.30 11.50+1.80 Kepler-33 f 4.47±0.42 −2.10 Kepler-333 b 28.20+29.00 −24.10 1.61±0.17 8.50+7.20 Kepler-338 e −6.30 7.30+7.80 Kepler-339 c −6.20 Kepler-339 d 14.70+14.10 Kepler-350 c Kepler-350 d 14.94+5.40 −4.77 4.80+5.70 Kepler-351 b −4.70 Kepler-351 c 11.10+9.90 −7.60 4.46+0.33 Kepler-36 b −0.27 8.10+0.60 Kepler-36 c −0.46 Kepler-385 b 12.80+11.40 −6.80 Kepler-385 c 13.20+16.80 −9.00 Kepler-396 c 17.80+2.86 −1.27 Kepler-4 b 1.56±0.07 1258 1.16+0.45 −0.09 −10.00 1.18+0.46 −0.09 6.04±3.18 3.11+1.43 −0.61 2.81+1.28 −0.54 3.03+1.33 −0.24 3.16+1.38 −0.25 1.48±0.03 1069 3.68±0.05 1014 2.79+1.62 −0.35 3.10+1.81 −0.39 5.31+1.95 −0.99 24.47±3.81 4.01±0.21 1614 1009 1041 924 888 542 468 909 440 Kepler-406 b 6.36±1.27 1.44±0.03 1452 Kepler-406 c 2.86±1.91 0.85±0.03 1171 Kepler-454 b 6.84±1.40 2.37±0.13 916 Kepler-48 b 3.94±2.10 1.92±0.10 1024 Kepler-48 c 14.61±2.30 2.71±0.14 809 Kepler-60 c 3.90±0.80 1.90±0.15 1092 Kepler-48 d Kepler-49 b Kepler-49 c Kepler-51 b Kepler-51 c Kepler-51 d Kepler-54 b Kepler-54 c Kepler-56 b Kepler-57 c Kepler-60 b Kepler-60 d Kepler-65 c Kepler-68 b Kepler-68 c Kepler-78 b Kepler-79 b Kepler-79 c Kepler-79 d Kepler-79 e Kepler-80 b Kepler-80 c Kepler-81 b Kepler-81 c Kepler-82 c 561 492 546 627 2.72±0.12 2.55±0.13 7.95±4.61 2.04±0.11 7.80+15.40 −3.90 7.90+15.60 −3.90 2.22+1.59 7.10±0.30 −0.95 4.13±0.32 9.01+2.81 −1.71 7.63±0.95 9.71±0.50 21.50+5.60 −4.90 19.80+6.60 −4.40 22.25+3.81 −3.50 9.30+25.20 −3.00 4.20±0.60 1.71±0.13 1177 1.32±0.08 6.52+0.29 −0.28 1.55±0.67 2.19±0.07 1496 453 394 705 992 −18.50 2.61±0.04 1363 1252 4.20±0.80 1.99±0.16 26.60+20.40 2.31+0.06 8.26+2.22 −0.09 −2.54 4.77+2.54 0.95+0.03 −0.04 −3.50 1.91±0.32 1.18+0.16 −0.09 10.90+7.31 3.48±0.07 −6.04 6.04+1.91 −2.29 6.04+2.10 −1.59 4.13+1.21 −1.11 5.70+7.40 −4.10 7.00+8.90 −5.50 16.40+27.00 −9.90 4.00+6.70 −2.40 19.10+55.50 −4.90 3.73±0.08 7.17+0.13 −0.16 3.49±0.13 2.65±0.11 2.79±0.13 2.42±0.38 2.37±0.37 5.35±2.45 1033 2217 992 784 633 546 700 633 707 559 500 591 220.6 68.14 0.047 0.55 627 150.3 12.96 0.219 1.15 1.7 7.1 15.2 25.6 0.13 0.119 1.29 0.17 0.166 1.29 0.57 0.214 1.29 0.71 0.254 1.29 506 262.1 37.27 0.087 0.54 32.8 51.6 12.35 0.090 1.10 25.79 0.069 0.84 804 117.4 49.34 0.091 0.84 1.11 0.134 1.00 3.73 0.172 1.00 0.95 0.214 0.89 1.94 0.287 0.89 7.52 0.115 1.07 0.90 0.128 1.07 3.25 0.097 1.09 2.44 0.127 1.09 0.66 0.368 0.85 2.10 0.046 1.22 11.83 0.036 1.07 25.43 0.056 1.07 2.83 0.095 1.03 3.07 0.053 0.88 4.05 0.085 0.88 5.14 0.230 0.88 2.14 0.060 0.55 2.63 0.079 0.55 0.03 0.251 1.04 0.03 0.384 1.04 11.29 0.063 0.51 47.48 0.082 0.51 0.44 0.103 1.32 13.77 0.092 0.76 4.63 0.073 1.04 3.14 0.085 1.04 2.94 0.103 1.04 8.25 0.068 1.25 3.69 0.062 1.08 30.30 0.091 1.08 6.43 0.009 0.76 1.43 0.117 1.17 0.64 0.187 1.17 0.09 0.287 1.17 0.54 0.386 1.17 1.69 0.065 0.72 1.77 0.079 0.72 6.35 0.055 0.64 1.66 0.089 0.64 0.69 0.257 0.85 14.6 45.4 22.2 56.9 21.3 16.5 33.4 35.5 57.7 28.7 23.1 21.7 23.9 15.2 50.5 59.9 34.7 43.0 4.2 7.7 17.3 64.5 15.8 14.2 16.1 56.7 21.7 36.7 5.5 24.0 15.7 10.1 16.4 23.3 30.0 72.5 22.9 54.0 15.1 0.05 0.509 1.04 605 122.9 530 214.3 3.0 2.6 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 3.2 4.8 4.4 4.4 3.2 3.2 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 3.3 3.3 4.4 6.8 2.1 2.1 4.3 6.2 6.2 6.2 2.9 2.9 3.4 3.4 3.4 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.1 5.1 3.3 6.3 6.3 0.8 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.9 2.9 3.6 3.6 4.7 1.1 · · · 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 · · · 1.6 1.6 8.5 8.5 · · · · · · 1.6 1.6 · · · · · · 2.0 0.8 0.2 0.2 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.5 1.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 0.8 0.8 · · · 0.8 · · · · · · · · · 4.0 0.2 0.2 1.7 · · · · · · · · · · · · 1.1 1.1 2.0 2.0 · · · 243252.4 1.6×1036 1.8×1036 146470.2 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 321.0 758.8 759.5 296.8 9535.9 4731.3 4051.6 1032.9 7871.5 4264.3 10799.4 13691.2 356.0 5.6×1033 3.6×1033 197.9 10334.7 8348.0 2.5×1035 1.2×1035 8110.4 · · · HL14T X14T 1487.0 · · · 2707.6 2.2×1042 1.4×1036 1.6×106 HL16T 24.0 HL16T 1385.8 1.8×1037 7.5×1035 1.2 HL16T 837.4 3.3×1034 2.8×1034 3.0 HL16T 595.6 1.8×1034 6.1×1033 · · · HL14T 2381.1 · · · HL14T · · · HL14T · · · HL14T X14T 0.9 X14T · · · 1.6 HL14T · · · HL14T · · · Ca12T 2.1 Ca12T · · · HL14T · · · HL14T X14T · · · Bo10R · · · · · · Mar14R · · · Mar14R · · · Ge15R · · · Mar14R · · · Mar14R · · · Mar14R X13T · · · X13T 180.0 Mas14T 11.8 Mas14T 3.4 Mas14T · · · HL14T · · · HL14T H13T 1.9 X13T · · · · · · JH15bT · · · JH15bT · · · JH15bT · · · HL14T Gi13R · · · Gi13R · · · · · · Pep13R JH14T 1.2 JH14T JH14T JH14T X13T X13T X13T X13T X13T 6920.5 7.6×1034 6.3×1034 2709.1 1.7×1035 7.4×1034 1150.1 1.3×1037 6.1×1035 635.8 6.8×1034 2.0×1034 3568.7 3.6×1034 1.6×1034 2391.0 1.3×1034 9.6×1033 17772.7 6948.7 6.6×1034 3.0×1034 265.2 5074.4 3724.8 1.8×1039 1.0×1037 1596.5 5.3×1037 4.5×1036 908.7 1.3×1036 3.8×1035 2727.7 1610.1 18720.8 7.8×1035 4.2×1035 1761.3 96951.2 5999.3 4082.8 8833.6 8080.2 441.3 204.7 21.3 40.7 2.3 3.4 2.3 1.4 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 2.2 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 731021.4 · · · · · · MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016) Table A1 – continued Sub-Neptune Planet Parameters. An overabundance of low-density Neptunes 13 Name Mp M⊕ Rp R⊕ Teq K ρp FXUV g cm−3 AU M⊙ Gyr Ω⊙ erg s-1 cm-2 a Ms Age Ωrot 2.37±0.35 7.50+13.80 Kepler-83 c 485 −3.60 Kepler-84 b 21.20+32.00 −13.80 2.23±0.10 1092 Kepler-85 b 15.30+22.10 −10.80 1.97±0.10 884 Kepler-85 c 24.00+34.40 −16.70 2.18±0.10 6.40±0.80 6.15±0.09 Kepler-87 c 8.58±2.54 3.78+0.39 −0.36 Kepler-88 b 444 801 Kepler-89 b 10.49±4.45 1.72±0.16 1624 771 108.3 9.40+2.40 Kepler-89 c −2.10 Kepler-89 e 13.00+2.50 −2.10 Kepler-92 c 6.04±1.91 2.60±0.08 4.41±0.42 1154 6.70±0.63 665 856 Kepler-93 b 4.02±0.68 1.48±0.02 1138 Kepler-94 b 10.81±1.27 3.51±0.15 1095 Kepler-95 b 13.03±2.86 3.42±0.09 1019 Kepler-96 b 8.58±3.50 2.67±0.22 782 Kepler-97 b 3.50±1.91 1.48±0.13 1451 Kepler-98 b 3.50±1.59 2.00±0.22 1743 Kepler-99 b 6.15±1.30 1.48±0.08 WASP-47 d 15.20±7.00 3.64±0.13 880 983 Λ 49.5 65.9 66.4 17.7 21.5 28.5 14.0 22.1 20.5 18.1 21.3 28.3 31.2 12.3 7.6 35.8 32.2 3.12 0.126 0.66 10.50 0.083 1.00 10.95 0.078 0.92 12.83 0.103 0.92 0.15 0.671 1.10 0.88 0.095 0.96 11.43 0.051 1.28 0.60 0.101 1.28 0.24 0.305 1.28 1.89 0.186 1.21 6.82 0.053 0.91 1.38 0.034 0.81 1.79 0.102 1.08 2.48 0.125 1.00 5.93 0.036 0.94 2.42 0.026 0.99 10.46 0.050 0.79 3.1 9.6 4.0 4.0 7.2 2.2 3.3 3.3 3.3 5.9 5.2 2.5 8.7 3.7 4.6 8.3 4.3 1.74 0.086 1.04 · · · 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.1 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.7 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.4 Lhy s−1 · · · · · · · · · Len s−1 · · · · · · · · · 2880.2 11252.1 4726.9 · · · · · · · · · · · · 2738.9 178.9 9.6×1034 2.5×1034 2566.9 6.2×1034 2.2×1034 78217.2 20126.4 7.7×1035 4.3×1035 2227.5 1.7×1035 7.7×1034 3067.7 4.3×1034 1.6×1034 942.4 1815.1 3.5×1034 1.2×1034 281.0 2.6×1033 2.8×1033 128.8 · · · · · · · · · · · · 1966.4 2774.0 · · · · · · · · · · · · 883.3 6812.1 3.6×1034 2.8×1034 · · · · · · Lhy/Len Ref.a,b · · · · · · · · · · · · 3.8 X13T X13T X13T X13T O14T N13T 2.8 · · · W13R 1.8 Mas13T 2.2 Mas13T X14T 2.8 · · · Dr15R 2.9 Mar14R 0.9 Mar14R · · · Mar14R · · · Mar14R · · · Mar14R · · · Mar14R 1.3 Be15T a References for Planetary Masses and Radii. Alm15: Almenara et al. (2015), Alo14: Alonso et al. (2014), BT15: Berta-Thompson et al. (2015), Ba14: Barros et al. (2014), Ba15: Barros et al. (2015), Bak10: Bakos et al. (2010), Be15: Becker et al. (2015), Bi14: Biddle et al. (2014), Bo10: Borucki et al. (2010), Ca12: Carter et al. (2012), Co11: Cochran et al. (2011), De11: Demory et al. (2011), Dr15: Dressing et al. (2015), E16: Espinoza et al. (2016), Ga12: Gautier et al. (2012), Ge15: Gettel et al. (2016), Gi13: Gilliland et al. (2013), H13: Huber et al. (2013), HL14: Hadden & Lithwick (2014), HL16: Hadden & Lithwick (2016), Ha11: Hartman et al. (2011), Ha13: Harpsøe et al. (2013), JH14: Jontof-Hutter et al. (2014), JH15a: Jontof-Hutter et al. (2015), JH15b: Jontof-Hutter et al. (2016), K14: Kipping et al. (2014), L13: Lissauer et al. (2013), Mac14: Maciejewski et al. (2014), Mar14: Marcy et al. (2014), Mas13: Masuda et al. (2013), Mas14: Masuda (2014), Mot15: Motalebi et al. (2015), Mou14: Moutou et al. (2014), N13: Nesvorn´y et al. (2013), O14: Ofir et al. (2014), Pep13: Pepe et al. (2013), Pet15: Petigura et al. (2016), S14: Schmitt et al. (2014), SO12: Sanchis-Ojeda et al. (2012), V15: Vanderburg et al. (2015), VG14: Van Grootel et al. (2014), W13: Weiss et al. (2013), W16: Weiss et al. (2016), X13: Xie (2013), X14: Xie (2014). b The 'R' and 'T' superscripts indicate RV- and TTV-estimated mass, respectively. MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2016)
1604.05191	2	1604	2016-05-13T12:03:37	Giant planet formation in radially structured protoplanetary discs	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Our recent N-body simulations of planetary system formation, incorporating models for the main physical processes thought to be important during the building of planets (i.e. gas disc evolution, migration, planetesimal/boulder accretion, gas accretion onto cores, etc.), have been successful in reproducing some of the broad features of the observed exoplanet population (e.g. compact systems of low mass planets, hot Jupiters), but fail completely to form any surviving cold Jupiters. The primary reason for this failure is rapid inward migration of growing protoplanets during the gas accretion phase, resulting in the delivery of these bodies onto orbits close to the star. Here, we present the results of simulations that examine the formation of gas giant planets in protoplanetary discs that are radially structured due to spatial and temporal variations in the effective viscous stresses, and show that such a model results in the formation of a population of cold gas giants. Furthermore, when combined with models for disc photoevaporation and a central magnetospheric cavity, the simulations reproduce the well-known hot-Jupiter/cold-Jupiter dichotomy in the observed period distribution of giant exoplanets, with a period valley between 10-100 days.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) Preprint 16 May 2016 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Giant planet formation in radially structured protoplanetary discs Gavin A. L. Coleman(cid:63) & Richard P. Nelson Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, U.K. 6 1 0 2 y a M 3 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 1 9 1 5 0 . 4 0 6 1 : v i X r a ABSTRACT Our recent N-body simulations of planetary system formation, incorporating models for the main physical processes thought to be important during the building of plan- ets (i.e. gas disc evolution, migration, planetesimal/boulder accretion, gas accretion onto cores, etc.), have been successful in reproducing some of the broad features of the observed exoplanet population (e.g. compact systems of low mass planets, hot Jupiters), but fail completely to form any surviving cold Jupiters. The primary rea- son for this failure is rapid inward migration of growing protoplanets during the gas accretion phase, resulting in the delivery of these bodies onto orbits close to the star. Here, we present the results of simulations that examine the formation of gas giant planets in protoplanetary discs that are radially structured due to spatial and tempo- ral variations in the effective viscous stresses, and show that such a model results in the formation of a population of cold gas giants. Furthermore, when combined with models for disc photoevaporation and a central magnetospheric cavity, the simulations reproduce the well-known hot-Jupiter/cold-Jupiter dichotomy in the observed period distribution of giant exoplanets, with a period valley between 10–100 days. Key words: planetary systems, planets and satellites: formation, planets-disc inter- actions, protoplanetary discs. 1 INTRODUCTION Ever since the discovery of the first extrasolar giant planet around a main sequence star (Mayor & Queloz 1995), ques- tions have been asked as to the formation and evolution of giant exoplanets. To date over 1640 confirmed extraso- lar planets have been discovered, displaying a broad range of orbital and physical properties, and approximately 600 of these are believed to be gas giants (Han et al. 2014). Explain- ing the origins of the broad diversity of exoplanets remains a formidable challenge to planet formation theory, and even the more restricted challenge of explaining the orbital period distribution of giant exoplanets has not yet been addressed satisfactorily. Observational biases, in particular the fact that ground based transit surveys are only sensitive to detecting giant planets with orbital periods (cid:46) 10 days, and that radial ve- locity searches have surveyed stars that are more metal-rich than the average, give the impression that hot Jupiters are common. Recent studies that have examined data from the Kepler spacecraft and follow-up radial velocity measure- ments (Fressin et al. 2013; Santerne et al. 2015) find that hot Jupiters are expected to orbit only 1% of main sequence stars, while cold Jupiters have a higher occurrence rate of (cid:63) Email: [email protected] c(cid:13) 0000 The Authors 17% (Cassan et al. 2012). The occurrence rate between the two populations does not increase linearly, however, as a 'pe- riod valley' exists between 10–85 days where there is a dearth of giant planet detections when accounting for observational biases. This period valley was first observed in radial veloc- ity surveys (Udry et al. 2003; Cumming et al. 2008), and its existence has been supported by the aforementioned re- cent analysis of combined Kepler and radial velocity obser- vations (Santerne et al. 2015). Individual theories have been put forward to explain this period valley (Hasegawa & Pu- dritz 2011; Alexander & Pascucci 2012; Ercolano & Rosotti 2015), but none have been incorporated into ab initio models of planet formation to examine whether or not it is possi- ble to explain this, and other features in the giant planet distribution, from first principles. Competing theories of giant planet formation, including the core-accretion and pebble-accretion models (e.g. Ida & Lin 2004; Alibert et al. 2006; Mordasini et al. 2009; Bitsch et al. 2015b), and the tidal-downsizing model (e.g. Nayak- shin 2015), have been used to make predictions about the giant planet population for comparison with observations, and to examine the formation of giant planets in our So- lar System (Levison et al. 2015). The fact that many mul- tiplanet systems have been discovered, containing various combinations of super-Earths, Neptunes and Jovian mass bodies (Muirhead et al. 2012; Neveu-VanMalle et al. 2016; 2 G. A. L. Coleman and R. P. Nelson Becker et al. 2015), often in compact systems (e.g. Lissauer et al. 2011; Becker et al. 2015), suggests that gravitational interactions, and perhaps competitive accretion, are essen- tial components of the planet formation process. Further- more, the fact that many giant planets appear to be on ec- centric orbits suggests that dynamical instabilities involving initially compact giant planet systems, either during or after formation, are common and important for shaping planetary system architectures (e.g. Rasio & Ford 1996). For this rea- son, we have adopted the approach of using N-body simu- lations, combined with prescriptions for the major physical processes thought to occur during planet formation, to sim- ulate the building and early evolution of planetary systems. In recent work (Coleman & Nelson 2014, 2016), we have examined the formation of planets in irradiated, viscous disc models that have adopted the standard α prescription (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973; Lynden-Bell & Pringle 1974). Ex- cept for a small region close to the star where the temper- ature exceeds 1000 K, we have assumed that α is constant, leading to smooth temperature and surface density profiles in the discs. The models have been successful in forming systems containing hot Jupiters, multiple super-Earths and Neptunes in compact configurations, and numerous terres- trial planets with a variety of compositions, but the mod- els fail completely to form any surviving cold Jupiters. The main reason for this is that giant planet cores undergo rapid inward migration as they accrete gas, because the corota- tion torques that are needed to counteract the Lindblad torques become saturated (e.g. Paardekooper et al. 2011). These planets then end up as hot planets orbiting close to the star. Coleman & Nelson (2014) undertook a detailed ex- amination of the conditions required for giant planet forma- tion and survival, and showed that a Jovian mass planet that settles into a final orbit at 5 au must have initiated runaway gas accretion and type II migration when at an orbital radius ∼ 15 au, and this should have occurred late in the disc life- time so that the gas disc disperses before the planet type II migrates all the way to the central star (or into the magneto- spheric cavity if one is present). In this paper, we address the question of whether or not radial structuring of a protoplan- etary disc, because of spatial and temporal variations in the viscous stress, can prevent accreting giant planet cores from migrating inwards rapidly because of the 'planet traps' cre- ated by the surface density variations (Masset et al. 2006). Although we adopt a simple, proof-of-concept 'toy model' for the generation of radial structuring of the disc, our re- sults suggest that this may provide an effective means of allowing the formation of surviving cold Jupiters, and point the way to an avenue of potentially fruitful future research. The paper is organised as follows. We describe the up- dates to our physical model and numerical methods in sect. 2. We present our results in sect. 3, and draw our conclusions in sect. 4. 2 PHYSICAL MODEL AND NUMERICAL METHODS The N-body simulations presented here were performed us- ing the Mercury-6 symplectic integrator (Chambers 1999), adapted to include the additional physical processes de- scribed below. Some of these are updated versions of those described in Coleman & Nelson (2016), and some of the pro- cesses are new to this paper. 2.1 Recap of the physical model The disc and planet formation models from Coleman & Nel- son (2016) contain the following elements: (i) The N-body component computes the gravitational inter- action between numerous planetary embryos and a swarm of orbiting planetesimals/boulders. The planetary embryos ex- perience gravitational forces from each other and from the planetesimals/boulders, whereas the planetesimals/boulders experience gravitational forces from the embryos only, and not from the other small bodies. The planetesimals/boulders are treated as "super-planetesimals" that are supposed to represent a large collection of actual small bodies. The masses of these super-planetesimals are therefore much larger than the mass of an individual small body, but also significantly smaller than the embryo mass. The super- planetesimals experience gas drag, and are therefore as- signed a physical radius in the range 10 m ≤ R ≤ 10 km. (ii) The gas disc is evolved by solving the diffusion equation for a 1D viscous α-disc model (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973; Lynden-Bell & Pringle 1974). Temperatures are calculated by balancing viscous heating and stellar irradiation with black-body cooling. We use two values of the background α value in our simulations, 2 × 10−3 and 6 × 10−3. We as- sume that solar metallicity corresponds to a gas-to-solids ratio of 100:1, and that half of the grains in the disc remain small and contribute to the opacity, and half of them grow to form larger planet-building bodies. When a giant planet is present, tidal torques from the planet are applied to the disc leading to the opening of a gap (Lin & Papaloizou 1986). (iii) We mimic the presence of fully-developed MHD turbu- lence in the inner disc, when the disc temperature exceeds 1000 K (Umebayashi & Nakano 1988; Desch & Turner 2015), by increasing the viscosity parameter there by a factor of 5 above the background values of α = 2 × 10−3 or 6 × 10−3. (iv) We incorporate models for the photoevaporation of the disc. We have implemented a standard photoevaporative wind model (Dullemond et al. 2007), where the wind is as- sumed to be launched thermally from the disc upper and lower surfaces beyond a critical radius that corresponds ap- proximately to the thermal velocity being equal to the es- cape velocity. We have also implemented a direct photoe- vaporation model that can be switched on, in addition to the standard model, if the inner gas disc becomes depleted and optically thin such that the stellar radiation acts di- rectly on the disc inner edge that faces the star (Alexan- der & Armitage 2009). The influence of including, or not including, the direct photoevaporation component on the fi- nal outcomes of the simulations is one of the issues that we investigate in this paper, along with the effect of neglecting photoevaporation altogether. (v) Boulders and planetesimals orbiting in the disc expe- rience aerodynamic drag, with the drag law (Stokes or Ep- stein) depending on the objects size and the molecular mean free path (Weidenschilling 1977). For reference, we note that the drag-induced migration time scales associated with the different sized bodies are as follows (assuming a disc mass equivalent to the minimum mass solar nebula). A 10 m boul- der migrates from 1 au into the central magnetospheric cav- MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) ity at 0.04 au in approximately 103 yr, and from 20 au in approximately 106 yr. A 100 m planetesimal migrates from 1 au within approximately 5 × 105 yr, and within the disc lifetime it migrates from 10 au to 6 au. The 1 km and 10 km planetesimals display very small amounts of migration over the disc lifetime. (vi) Torque formulae from Paardekooper et al. (2010, 2011) are used to simulate type I migration due to Lindblad and corotation torques, and our model accounts for the possible saturation of the corotation torque. The influences of eccen- tricity and inclination on the disc forces are also included (Cresswell & Nelson 2008; Fendyke & Nelson 2014). (vii) Type II migration of gap forming planets is simu- lated using the impulse approximation of Lin & Papaloizou (1986), where we use the gap opening criterion of Crida et al. (2006) to determine when to switch between type I and II migration. Thus, when a planet is in the gap opening regime, the planet exerts tidal torques on the disc to open a gap, and the disc back-reacts onto the planet to drive type II migra- tion in a self-consistent manner. (viii) The accretion of gaseous envelopes on to solid cores occurs once a planet's mass exceeds 3 M⊕, and the gas ac- cretion rate is obtained from analytic fits to the detailed 1D models based on solving the planetary structure equations in the presence of prescribed rates of planetesimal accretion presented by Movshovitz et al. (2010). Gas that is accreted onto a planet is removed from the surrounding disc, such that the accretion scheme conserves mass. (ix) The effective capture radius of a protoplanet that ac- cretes boulders/planetesimals is enhanced by atmospheric drag using the prescription from Inaba & Ikoma (2003). We adopt an inner boundary to our simulation domain at 0.04 au, which we assume to represent the outer edge of an inner magnetospheric cavity. Any planet that enters this region no longer evolves, unless another planet enters the cavity, in which case the latter body is retained and the for- mer one is assumed to have been pushed into the star. This is repeated for all subsequent planets that pass through the inner boundary (note that no sub-Neptune mass planets en- tered the cavity and pushed any giants into the star). When presenting our results in Figs. 6, 8, 9 and 10, we reassign the final semimajor axes of these inner planets to straddle the stopping radius at 0.04 au, in order to mimic our expecta- tion that the inner cavities will have a range of radii. This reassignment assumes that the distribution of cavity edges is Gaussian with standard deviation of 0.01 au. 2.2 Model improvements 2.2.1 Gas envelope accretion A planet undergoes runaway gas accretion once the enve- lope and core are of comparable mass, and during this phase the planet rapidly accretes the material occupying its feed- ing zone, until it reaches its 'gas isolation mass', where the feeding zone is now empty and a gap has formed in the disc. Coleman & Nelson (2014) obtained fits to the runaway gas accretion rates from 2D hydrodynamic simulations, but they only considered the migration of the rapidly accret- ing planet after it had reached its 'gas isolation mass'. We have improved on the fits of Coleman & Nelson (2014) by allowing the planet to migrate while undergoing runaway MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) Giant planet formation in structured discs 3 gas accretion. Including migration in the determination of the fits makes them more consistent with the hydrodynamic models. Once a planet enters the runaway gas accretion phase prior to reaching the gap forming mass, we apply the follow- ing steps: (i) Calculate the gas isolation mass, miso, according to: miso = 2πrpΣg(rp)∆r (1) where Σg(rp) is the gas surface density taken at the planet's location, and ∆r is given by √ ∆r = 6 3RH (2) where RH is the planet's Hill radius. (ii) Recalculate miso at each time step to account for the drop in Σg as the material in the planet's feeding zone di- minishes. (iii) Allow the planet to grow rapidly to miso by removing gas from the disc around the planet and adding it to the planet, using gas accretion rates obtained from the fits to the Movshovitz et al. (2010) models. Once the planet reaches miso, it transitions to type II migration and begins accreting at the viscous rate. dt ≥ 2 M⊕ per 1000 yr. When the gas isola- When implementing the above prescription, we define the point at which the planet enters runaway gas accretion to be when dm tion mass is calculated we assume a maximum gas isolation mass of 400 M⊕, which accounts for when a planet enters the runaway gas accretion phase in a massive disc, where tidal torques from the planet would evacuate the feeding zone before the gas isolation mass was reached. We note that a planet that does not reach the runaway gas accretion mass prior to reaching the local gap forming mass would instead transition directly to type II migration without accreting the material within its feeding zone, and will begin accreting at the smaller of the rate obtained from the fits to Movshovitz et al. (2010), or the viscous supply rate. 2.2.2 Migration during runaway gas accretion Until the planet reaches the mass required for runaway gas accretion, it undergoes type I migration using the torque formulae of Paardekooper et al. (2010, 2011). Once it un- dergoes runaway gas accretion, the planet begins to carve a gap in the disc by rapidly accreting the surrounding ma- terial. To account for this change in conditions, the planet stops undergoing type I migration and begins to migrate at a rate with a timescale equal to the local viscous evolution time: τν = 2rp 3ν . (3) Migration at this rate continues until the planet reaches the gas isolation mass, where it transitions to self-consistent type II migration driven by the coupling to the viscous evolution of the disc via the impulse approximation (Lin & Papaloizou 1986). We note that recent hydrodynamic simulations have indicated that the migration of gap forming planets does not necessarily occur at exactly the viscous flow rate of the gas in the disc (Duffell et al. 2014; Durmann & Kley 2015), due to residual gas in the gap adding to the migration torque. For the disc and planet masses that we consider in 4 G. A. L. Coleman and R. P. Nelson this work, however, the migration rates provided by the im- pulse approximation are in reasonable agreement with those obtained in hydrodynamic calculations (Coleman & Nelson 2014). 2.3 Disc radial structures Our recent simulations failed to form any surviving gas gi- ant planets, other than hot Jupiters that are only prevented from migrating into their host stars by the presence of a cen- tral magnetospheric cavity (Coleman & Nelson 2014, 2016). An analysis of the conditions required for gas giants to form and survive outside of the central cavity presented in Cole- man & Nelson (2014) demonstrated that runaway gas ac- cretion and the transition to type II migration needs to oc- cur when the planets are distant from their stars. For ex- ample, for a Jovian mass planet to form and settle into a final orbit at ∼ 1 au, requires type II migration to be ini- tiated at ∼ 6 au. A Jovian planet orbiting at ∼ 5 au needs to initiate runaway gas accretion and type II migration at ∼ 15 au. The time of formation also provides a constraint: form too early in the disc life time and a planet migrates all the way into the central cavity; form too late and there is insufficient gas available to build a gas giant. It is notewor- thy that population synthesis simulations produce a large number of surviving cold gas giants (e.g. Mordasini et al. 2009). Coleman & Nelson (2014) examined the planet mass and orbital evolution obtained using the following three ap- proaches: 1D disc models similar to those presented in this paper; 2D hydrodynamic simulations that were designed to match the conditions in the 1D models; the prescriptions for mass growth and migration used in population synthesis models. They showed that the discrepancy obtained in gi- ant planet survival rates between the modelling approaches arises because a migration-slowing factor is included in the population synthesis models when in the so-called planet- dominated regime, and this results in too much slowing of type II migration compared to that observed in the 2D hy- drodynamic simulations or in the 1D viscous disc models. Retaining the cores of gas giants at large orbital radii is difficult, especially late in the disc life time. The corotation and Lindblad torques need to balance, such that the core or- bits in a "zero-migration zone" (Bitsch & Kley 2011; Hellary & Nelson 2012; Cossou et al. 2013). The corotation torque has entropy-related and vortensity-related components, and it is the entropy-part that is normally strongest and able to balance the Lindblad torque when the temperature pro- file decreases outwards steeply. In a viscous, irradiated disc, the inner regions of the disc, where the viscous dissipation dominates the heating, have steep temperature gradients, and early in the disc life time the zero-migration zone can extend out to ∼ 10 au for planet masses (cid:38) 10 M⊕ (Bitsch & Kley 2011; Hellary & Nelson 2012; Cossou et al. 2013; Coleman & Nelson 2014; Bitsch et al. 2015a). As the disc evolves, however, the viscous heating rate decreases and the zero-migration zone moves into the inner 1–2 au and only prevents the migration of lower mass planets. Although the details of the evolution depend on input parameters such as the viscous stress and the opacity, it would seem to be dif- ficult to maintain strong entropy-related corotation torques in the outer disc regions during the later phases of disc evo- lution. One alternative for maintaining cores at large radii might be for the vortensity-part of the corotation torque to be strengthened in regions where the surface density in- creases with radius, such as may occur if the disc surface density contains undulations . These regions might act as planet traps (Masset et al. 2006), as well as being regions where small sized bodies such as dust, pebbles, boulders and small planetesimals could concentrate (e.g. Pinilla et al. 2012). The main focus of this paper is to examine the conse- quences of allowing protoplanetary discs to be radially struc- tured because of radial variations in the viscous stress. Our approach is to employ a very simple "toy model" for simulat- ing these radial structures, but we derive motivation from re- cent observations of protoplanetary discs, and from the long history of MHD simulations showing that discs which sup- port magnetorotational turbulence (Balbus & Hawley 1991) often demonstrate radial structuring in the form of zonal flows. 2.3.1 Observed structures Recent observations of the young class I T Tauri star, HL Tau, have shown the presence of a number of quasi- axisymmetric rings, corresponding to maxima and minima in the emitted intensity as a function of radius. The sys- tem of rings extends between 13–100 au (ALMA Partnership et al. 2015). A number of suggestions have been put forward to explain the rings, included embedded planets (Dipierro et al. 2015; Picogna & Kley 2015), pressure bumps that trap dust (Flock et al. 2015), enhanced dust growth near ice lines (Zhang et al. 2015), and sintering of dust aggregates (Okuzumi et al. 2015). Even more recent ALMA observa- tions of the disc around TW Hydra have also uncovered a series of rings (Andrews et al. 2016), suggesting that these really are common phenomena that arise during the evolu- tion of protoplanetary discs. The closer proximity of TW Hydra to the Solar System allows regions of the disc that lie closer to the central star to be probed by the ALMA observations, and these have uncovered rings between or- bital radii 1 – 40 au. Furthermore, although high resolution ALMA images of other protoplanetary discs have not yet been released, existing ALMA data for a number of other discs indicate that ring structures are present in the disc outer regions (Zhang et al. 2016), suggesting that these fea- tures are common phenomena that arise during the evolution of protoplanetary discs. Although we do not attempt to fit our simulations to these observations, we simply note that a plausible scenario for the origin of these rings is radial varia- tion in the effective viscous/turbulent stresses that give rise to variations in the surface density. 2.3.2 Zonal flows in MHD simulations Over a number of years, both global (Steinacker & Pa- paloizou 2002; Papaloizou & Nelson 2003; Fromang & Nelson 2006) and local (Johansen et al. 2009) simulations of magne- tised discs have demonstrated the occurrence of persistent density/pressure maxima and minima as a function of ra- dius, arising from localised magnetic flux concentration and associated enhancement of magnetic stresses. More recent simulations incorporating non-ideal MHD effects have also reported the existence of these features in local (Bai & Stone MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) Giant planet formation in structured discs 5 stresses may be a common feature of planet forming discs. In addition to the zonal flows described above, similar features may also arise in regions where there is a transition from one non-ideal MHD process being dominant to another becom- ing dominant (e.g. a transition between Hall and ambipolar dominated regimes), or at the interface between magneti- cally active and dead zones. In the presence of these transi- tions, the disc may not be able to maintain a constant mass flux through all radii at all times, and radial structuring may occur. For simplicity, in this paper we just consider a rather crude model for disc structuring that is intended to mimic the growth and decay of zonal flows, but we note that radial structuring may also occur because of other physical pro- cesses that influence the local rate of mass flow through the disc. 2.3.3 A simple model for radial structuring We incorporate radial structuring in our models by intro- ducing a spatially and temporally varying viscous stress. At any one time, four structures are present in our simu- lations. While this number is arbitrary, it is similar to the number of rings observed in HL Tau and TW Hydra. Each one exists between specific, predefined radii (Rmin, Rmax), where the values are given in Table 1. Each structure has a finite life time (see the final column of Table 1), and as it decays a new structure grows within the same range of radii Rmin < R < Rmax. We initiate the structures 50,000 years after the start of the simulations, once the disc has reached a quasi-steady state, by increasing the viscosity pa- rameter α up to a maximum strength of 1.5× that of the background value. This value was chosen to approximately match the ∼ 50% variation in the surface density due to the zonal flows obtained in the MHD simulations of Bai & Stone (2014). For each structure, the maximum value of α is located at the centre of that structure, whilst we transi- tion α to its background value over a distance of 3.5 local scale heights using a Gaussian kernel, giving each structure a width of 7 local scale heights. Once each of the structures begins to form, it does so over 100 local orbital periods by increasing α from the background value up to the required value, as described below: α(r, t) = αb + αb 2 Rnewtnew (4) where αb is the background value, and Rnew and tnew are the radial and time factors defined by (cid:19) (cid:18)−(R − Rstruc)2 (cid:18) 2H 2 struc (cid:18) 6(t − tstart − 0.5(t100 − tstart)) t100 − tstart Rnew = exp tnew = 0.5 × tanh (cid:19) (5) (cid:19) + 1 (6) where the subscript 'struc' denotes the radial location of the centre of the structure, tstart is the structure formation time, t100 − tstart represents the time interval of 100 orbital periods after the structure begins to form, evaluated at the structure's centre, and H is the local disc scale height. The shape and time evolution of the locally varying viscous α parameter associated with an individual structure as it forms Figure 1. Plot showing the time variation of the viscous α asso- ciated with the formation of a radial structure over a time of 100 local orbits. Structure Rmin Rmax (au) label (au) Lifetimes (×103 local orbits) 1 2 3 4 4.25 9.25 14.25 19.25 5.75 10.75 15.75 20.75 10, 50, 100 10, 50, 100 10, 50, 100 10, 50, 100 Table 1. Radial structure parameters 2014) and global (Zhu et al. 2014; B´ethune et al. 2016) sim- ulations. Density variations with amplitudes up to ∼ 50% of the background have been reported (Bai & Stone 2014). Being in geostrophic balance, these pressure bumps are of- ten referred to as zonal flows (Johansen et al. 2009). Simon et al. (2012) have recently observed long-lived zonal flows in simulations with radial domains up to 16 scale heights, and in these large shearing boxes they find that the outer radial scale of the zonal flows is ∼ 6H, although they stress that simulations in larger domains are required to demonstrate convergence. Dittrich et al. (2013) ran shearing box simu- lations with radial domains up to 21H and also found the radial sizes of the axisymmetric zonal flows to be between 5 and 7H. The study by (Bai & Stone 2014) noted that zonal flows in radially-narrow shearing boxes tended to be intermittent, but runs in large shearing boxes of width 16H persisted for the full duration of the simulations, which had total run times of 400 orbits. Zonal flows are clearly able to live for long times, but at present it is not clear what their characteristic life times are. Although we do not try to fit a model to these MHD simulations, and instead take the approach of employing a simple prescription to demonstrate "proof of concept", we note that global MHD simulations which display dust concentration in pressure bumps have been used to com- pare theoretical calculations with the observed structures in protoplanetary discs (Flock et al. 2015). Density and pres- sure bumps arising from variations in magnetic or turbulent MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) 6 G. A. L. Coleman and R. P. Nelson Figure 2. Surface density profiles at t = 0.1, 1, 2, 3 Myr for a 1 × MMSN disc (total lifetime ∼ 5.5 Myr) without (left panel) and with (right panel) radial structuring. is shown in Fig. 1, where the α parameter gradually increases to the required value, while maintaining a smooth profile. Our structures have specific lifetimes, and this is a pa- rameter that we vary in the simulations described below. When a structure comes to the end of its lifetime it quickly disappears over 100 local orbital periods. As one structure disappears, another one forms at a randomly chosen location within the range of allowed radii given in Table 1. When the structure starts to disappear, α evolves according to: α(r) = αb + Rold(1 − told), where told is given by told = 0.5 × tanh (cid:18) 6(t − tend − 0.5(t100 − tend)) t100 − tend αb 2 (cid:18) (cid:19) (7) (cid:19) + 1 . (8) Here, tend is the time at which the structure begins to dissi- pate and t100 represents 100 orbital periods after this time. Rold is equal to equation 5 but with values taken for the old structure instead of a new one, as shown by this expression (cid:18)−(R − Roldstruc)2 (cid:19) 2H 2 oldstruc Rold = exp . (9) To account for a new structure being influenced by a dissi- pating older structure, equation 4 becomes (Rnewtnew + Rold(1 − told)) α(r, t) = αb + (10) αb 2 This allows a smooth transition between two adjacent form- ing/dissipating structures. Below we discuss the main effects of radial structures on the disc profile and migration of embedded low mass planets. 2.3.4 Effects on disc and planet evolution Fig. 2 shows the surface density evolution for a 1 × MMSN disc in simulations without (left panel) and with (right panel) radial structuring. The drop in surface density in the inner regions of the discs arises because both models include an increase in α by a factor of 5 from the background values of either 2 × 10−3 or 6 × 10−3 where the disc temperature exceeds 1000 K (Coleman & Nelson 2016). The presence of the radial structures arising from the variations in α in the outer disc are evident in the right panel. While these surface density dips have little influence on the global disc evolution, they have a dramatic effect on planet migration. Fig. 3 shows contours that illustrate the direction and speed of type I planet migration as a function of planet mass and semimajor axis at different times in a 1 × MMSN disc with solar metallicity. The left panel shows a simula- tion without radial structuring, and the right panel is for a run with structuring switched on. Red regions correspond to rapid inward migration, blue regions correspond to rapid outward migration, and white contours interspersed between the red and blue contours represent zero-migration zones where Lindblad and corotation torques cancel. The white contours at the top of the panels correspond to planets reach- ing the gap opening mass and undergoing type II migration. The planet trap arising from the inner fully-developed tur- bulent region is represented by the innermost blue contour, apparent in the first three frames of each simulation. As the surface density decreases, the zero-migration zones and ex- tended regions of outward migration associated with strong entropy-related corotation torques slowly move in towards the star on the disc evolution time scale in both runs, but the run with radial structures maintains four zero-migration zones in the outer disc for the duration of the simulation, leading to the possibility of long-term trapping of planetary cores with masses up to ∼ 30 M⊕. If a planet core was to migrate to the edge of one of the four structures, then it would be trapped for the life- time of the structure. The core is released from the structure when it comes to the end of its life, and the planet starts to migrate inwards. A new structure is formed locally to re- place the old one, and this has some probability of being located inside the old one (that depends on the location of the old structure within its allowed range of radii). If the new structure sits inside the old one then the planet core can be trapped by it, but if it sits outside the planet lo- cation then the planet migrates inwards, either into one of the other three structures, or in towards the star if it has just escaped from the innermost structure. Furthermore, a MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) Giant planet formation in structured discs 7 Figure 3. Contour plots showing regions of inwards (red) and outwards (blue) migration) in a 1 × MMSN disc at t = 0.1 (top left), 1 (top right), 2 (bottom left) and 3 Myr (bottom right) for discs without (left panel) and with radial structuring (right panel). The white contours at the top of each panel corresponds to the planet reaching the local gap forming mass, at which point the planet will undergo type II migration. The contours represent values of γΓ/Γ0, where γ is the ratio of specific heats, Γ is the torque experienced by a planet and Γ0 is a normalisation factor defined in Paardekooper et al. (2010) rapidly migrating planet core can escape from a structure while it is decaying and before the next structure has devel- oped fully. This shows that the long term orbital evolution of a planetary core has a stochastic element that depends on the detailed evolutionary histories of the radial structures in the disc. Some cores remain trapped at large radius over the disc lifetime, whereas other cores escape from the planet traps and migrate into the disc inner regions. Gas accretion can occur onto a core that is trapped if its mass exceeds mp ≥ 3 M⊕, and if it remains in the outer disc for an extended period of time then runaway gas ac- cretion can occur and a giant planet can form. The planet would then open a gap in the disc, and begin to undergo type II migration as the planet traps are not effective for gap forming planets. The process of building planets at the planet traps is enhanced by the concentration of boulders and planetesimals at these locations, which can then be ac- creted efficiently by the growing planets. In general, we find that accretion of solids by planetary embryos occurs during an early burst, prior to the onset of the main gas accretion phase. Gas accretion is then accompanied by modest plan- etesimal accretion at rates that are similar to or below those prescribed in the Movshovitz et al. (2010) models that deter- mine gas accretion rates in our simulations. Approximately 20% of the giant planets in our runs experience an episode of rapid and short-lived solids accretion, normally during the runaway gas accretion phase when the growth of the giant acts to destabilise the system. This burst of accretion can either arise from an impact with a low mass protoplanet, or through accretion of a local swarm of planetesimals over a time period that is less than ∼10,000 years. Our fits to the Movshovitz et al. (2010) models do not allow the gas accretion rate to respond to this time-varying planetesimal accretion, and this is one area for future improvement of our model. In summary, we have introduced a simple model for the radial structuring of protoplanetary discs that includes assumptions about the number of surface density features MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) (planet traps) that are formed and their lifetimes. We present this model as a simple proof-of-concept in this paper, and do not include an extensive analysis of what happens when the model parameters are modified. It is reasonable to suppose, however, that reducing the number of planet traps and their lifetimes will result in less efficient trapping of planet cores, and hence less efficacious giant planet forma- tion. Precisely how the formation of giant planets is affected by variation of model parameters will be examined in future work. 2.4 Initial conditions Table 2 gives an overview of the parameters used in our simu- lations. All simulations were initiated with 44 planetary em- bryos, of mass 0.2 M⊕, with semimajor axes between 1 and 20 au and separated by 10 mutual Hill radii. These were em- bedded in a swarm of thousands of planetesimals/boulders, that were distributed with semimajor axes between 0.5 and 25 au, with masses either 10, 20 or 50 times smaller than the embryos, depending on the metallicity of the system. (This varying mass ratio between embryos and planetesi- mals was implemented to obtain a planetesimal number that allowed the simulations to run on reasonable time scales. Be- tween 1000 and 5000 planetesimals/boulders were used and run times for individual simulations varied between 2 and 6 months.) The total mass of solids ranges between 12.5– 109 M⊕ depending on the disc mass and metallicity. The effective physical radii of planetesimals were set to 10 m, 100 m, 1 km or 10 km, such that the primary feedstock of the accreting protoplanets ranged from being boulders to large planetesimals whose evolution differed principally be- cause of the strengths of the gas drag forces that they experi- enced. Initial eccentricities and inclinations for protoplanets and planetesimals/boulders were randomized according to a Rayleigh distribution, with scale parameters e0 = 0.01 and i0 = 0.25◦, respectively. 8 G. A. L. Coleman and R. P. Nelson Parameter Disc mass Disc metallicity Total solids mass Background viscous α Planetesimal radii Planetesimal mass Planetesimal number Gas disc lifetimes Values/Ranges 1, 2 ×MMSN 0.5, 1, 2 × Solar 12.5–109 M⊕ 2 × 10−3, 6 × 10−3 10 m, 100 m, 1 km, 10 km 0.004, 0.01, 0.02 M⊕ 1000 – 5000 3.5 – 8.4 Myr Table 2. Values, and the ranges of values, adopted for various simulation parameters. Collisions between protoplanets and other protoplanets or planetesimals resulted in perfect sticking, which probably results in a slight overestimate of accretion rates in the sim- ulations. We neglect planetesimal-planetesimal interactions and collisions in our simulations for reasons of computational speed. The gas disc masses simulated were 1 and 2 times the mass of the minimum mass solar nebula (MMSN Hayashi 1981). We also vary the metallicity so that the initial solids- to-gas mass ratios in the discs are equal to 0.5, 1 and 2 times the solar value for the different models. We define the solar metallicity to be equivalent to the solids-to-gas ratio intro- duced by Hayashi (1981). We smoothly increase the mass of solids exterior to the snow line by a factor of 4 by increasing the numbers of planetesimals, and the initial surface den- sity of solids follows the initial gas surface density power law, as described in Hellary & Nelson (2012). The factor of four increase in solids implies a larger increase in water content than obtained by Lodders (2003) for the solar neb- ula, but is consistent with the widely used Hayashi model (Hayashi 1981). We adopt this model to maintain continuity with our earlier work (Hellary & Nelson 2012; Coleman & Nelson 2014, 2016). We track the changes in planetary com- positions throughout the simulations, as planets can accrete material originating either interior or exterior to the snow line. We use two different values for the background α value, α = 2 × 10−3 and 6 × 10−3. These values of α correspond to disc lifetimes of 5.5 and 3.5 Myr respectively for a disc with mass equal to 1 × MMSN. We examine the effect of varying the lifetimes of the radial structures in the disc, with the three values assumed being 104, 5 × 104 and 105 local orbital periods. We ran two instances of each parameter set, where only the random number seed used to generate initial particle positions and velocities was changed, meaning that a total of 288 simulations have been run. The simulations were run for 10 Myr, or until no protoplanets remained. 2.5 Planet classification scheme To assist in the discussion of simulation outcomes, we have developed a classification system for the different bodies that are formed. As there are no formal IAU definitions for ex- oplanet classes relating to their masses and compositions, there is freedom of choice in how planets should be classi- fied. We have chosen a scheme that uses mass as the pri- mary discriminant and composition as a secondary one. We use the labels "Earth", "Neptune" and "Jupiter", along with the prefix "super" to define six mass-based classes, and sub- classes are defined according to the volatiles content, either in the form of ice or gas, of the planets. Definitions of the different planet classes are given in Table 3. Note that when we use the term "gas giant" we are referring to Jupiters or super-Jupiters. 3 RESULTS We now present the results for our simulations. We begin by discussing a representative run in which multiple giant planets were able to form and survive. We then present an overview of all the simulation outcomes, before examining how modifying parameters such as the disc mass, metallicity, photoevaporation model etc. changes the results. 3.1 Run CJ120.1210A Run CJ120.1210A had a disc mass of 1 × MMSN, 2× solar metallicity, and contained planetesimals with radii Rp = 100 m. The total mass in planetesimals was 43.2 M⊕ and that in protoplanets was 8.8 M⊕. The background α = 2 × 10−3, and radial structures had a lifetime of 10,000 local orbits. The direct photoevaporation model was used. The evolution of protoplanet masses, semimajor axes and eccentricities are shown in Fig. 4, and the final state of the system is also represented in Fig. 10 (the case with the label CJ120.1210A). We also show the mass versus orbital period evolution of all protoplanets in Fig. 5, where filled black circles represent surviving planets, and the evolution of the labelled planets is described below. The end state af- ter 10 Myr consists of: an inner compact system comprising 3 super-Earths/Neptunes; a cool Neptune and Earth-mass planet orbiting between 2.5–3.4 au; two cold Jupiters orbit- ing between 6–12 au; a collection of low mass planets ('de- bris'), that failed to grow during the simulation, orbiting out beyond 20-30 au. We ignore the long period 'debris' in our discussion below, and just concentrate on the other planets that form. 3.1.1 Cold Jupiters The cores of the two Jupiters (see planet labels 1 and 2 in Figs. 4 and 5) begin to form at orbital radii 15-25 au within the first 0.5 Myr of the simulation, through a combination of planetesimal accretion and mutual collisions between em- bryos. Migration and trapping of planetesimals in the radial structures helps concentrate material which is then accreted by the embryos, stimulating rapid growth above 3 M⊕ such that gas accretion onto the growing cores can start. These proto-giant planets remain trapped at large radii by the ra- dial structures, and continue to accrete gas steadily until runaway gas accretion is initiated at times just before and after 3 Myr, respectively (see the top panel of Fig. 4). The rapid burst of gas accretion takes the planet masses up to ∼ 100 M⊕, after which gap opening ensues. Initially both planets accrete at the viscous supply rate, but 'planet 1' truncates the disc exterior to it and prevents further gas accretion on to 'planet 2', which lies interior to 'planet 1'. The onset of gap formation allows the planets to type II migrate inwards until the gas disc is completely removed MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) Classification Mass Rock % Ice % Gas % Final Number Giant planet formation in structured discs 9 Rocky Earth Water-rich Earth Rocky super-Earth Water-rich super-Earth Gas-rich super-Earth Gas-poor Neptune Gas-rich Neptune Gas-poor super-Neptune Gas-rich super-Neptune Jupiter Super-Jupiter mp < 3 M⊕ mp < 3 M⊕ 3 M⊕ ≤ mp < 10 M⊕ 3 M⊕ ≤ mp < 10 M⊕ 3 M⊕ ≤ mp < 10 M⊕ 10 M⊕ ≤ mp < 35 M⊕ 10 M⊕ ≤ mp < 35 M⊕ 35 M⊕ ≤ mp < 100 M⊕ 35 M⊕ ≤ mp < 100 M⊕ 100 M⊕ ≤ mp < 1000 M⊕ mp ≥ 1000 M⊕ > 70 < 70 > 60 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A < 30 > 30 < 30 > 30 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 < 10 < 10 > 10 < 10 > 10 < 50 > 50 > 50 > 50 1563 4625 12 83 69 5 79 29 147 120 12 Table 3. Planetary classification parameters based on their mass and composition. Note that water-rich planets are so-called because they accrete water ice in solid form that originates from beyond the snow-line. Characteristics that play no role in the classification of a planet are denoted by "N/A" in the relevant columns. Note all Jupiters and Super-Jupiters formed in the simulations had gas mass fractions ≥ 50%. Figure 4. Evolution of masses, semimajor axes and eccentricities of all protoplanets in simulation CJ120.1210A, where the disc lifetime ∼ 4.5 Myr. Note that formation histories of selected surviving planets are indicated by the labels on the right side of the mass and semi-major axis subplots. after ∼ 4.5 Myr, although we note that the migration of 'planet 2' is slowed by the truncation of the disc by 'planet 1'. The gas giants have masses 306 M⊕ and 222 M⊕, gas mass fractions of 98%, semimajor axes 6.3 au and 11.4 au, orbital periods 15.8 yr and 38.5 yr and eccentricities ∼ 0, respec- tively. While this pair of planets are far from being a perfect analogue to the Jupiter-Saturn system, there is an obvious MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) similarity in terms of gross characteristics that is worthy of note (i.e. mass of inner planet > mass of outer planet and semimajor axis ratio ∼ 1.8). 10 G. A. L. Coleman and R. P. Nelson Figure 5. Evolution of planet mass versus orbital period for all protoplanets in simulation CJ120.1210A. Filled black circles rep- resent final masses and orbital periods for surviving planets. Note that formation histories of selected surviving planets are indicated by the labels adjacent to the filled black circles. The dotted black line at ∼ 4d represents the inner edge of our simulated proto- planetary disc. The arrows above the x-axis indicate the average positions of the four radial structures. 3.1.2 Cool Neptune and Earth These planets are labelled as 3 and 4 in Figs. 4 and 5. The cool Neptune begins its formation out beyond 10 au at the same time as the giant planet cores are forming, but interior to these two proto-giants. It also begins to accrete gas within the first 0.5 Myr, but at a slightly slower rate than the two proto-giants, and remains trapped by the radial structures during the first 3 Myr. The cool Neptune is nudged inwards when the innermost gas giant undergoes runaway gas ac- cretion and starts type II migrating, and this allows the Neptune to escape the radial structures and migrate in to- wards the central star. Gas accretion onto the Neptune and its migration halt when the gas disc disperses after 4.5 Myr, leaving it with a mass of 28.6 M⊕, gas mass fraction of 86%, semimajor axis ∼ 3.5 au, orbital period 6.5 yr, and eccentric- ity ∼ 0. As this gas-rich Neptune escaped the radial struc- tures and migrated inwards it shepherded a 1 M⊕ water-rich terrestrial planet ahead of it, which had a final semimajor axis ∼ 2.7 au and orbital period ∼ 4.4 yr. 3.1.3 Compact inner system of super-Earths/Neptunes The planets we discuss here have labels 5-7 in Figs. 4 and 5. This compact system forms from a combination of bodies that are initially orbiting interior to the radial structures and one dominant body that originates from larger radii. This more massive body grows through planetesimal accre- tion and collisions with neighbouring embryos out beyond 10 au, where it starts to accrete gas and remains trapped by the radial structures until 2 Myr. At this point its mass is 5 M⊕, and it is able to escape from the radial structures by migrating through them as they switch on and off, after which it undergoes rapid inward type I migration while con- tinuing to accrete gas (becoming a gas-rich Neptune in the process). The gas-rich Neptune shepherds a large number of interior embryos in a resonant convoy as it migrates, and when the gas disc starts to disperse after ∼ 3.5 Myr this convoy breaks up and mutual collisions between the numer- ous embryos lead eventually to the formation of a compact inner system comprised of 3 planets: a gas-poor Neptune with mass 11.6 M⊕, gas mass fraction 7%, semimajor axis ∼ 0.07 au, orbital period 6 days and eccentricity 0.11; an icy super-Earth with mass 8.4 M⊕, gas mass fraction 6.5%, semimajor axis ∼ 0.15 au, orbital period 16.2 days and ec- centricity 0.2; a gas-rich Neptune with mass 27.6 M⊕, gas mass fraction 56%, semimajor axis ∼ 0.2 au, orbital period 33.2 days and eccentricity 0.07. We note that the eccentrici- ties of the these planets were pumped up to the values shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 4 during a late scattering event at 5.2 Myr. 3.2 Ensemble results We now discuss the results of the simulations as a whole, focusing first on the masses and periods of the planets that form, and then on the eccentricity distribution. 3.2.1 Masses and periods Considering the results of the simulations as a whole, 132 surviving giant planets are formed with masses ranging from 0.3 MJupiter to 4 MJupiter, with periods from 5 days up to 24000 days (the smaller period being determined by our boundary conditions). The majority of these giant planets formed at the outer edges of radial structures, whilst a hand- ful of less massive giant planets accreted the majority of their gas envelopes after escaping from the radial structures and type I migrating towards the central star. Fig. 6 shows a mass versus period diagram for all of the surviving planets from the simulations, along with all confirmed exoplanets (Han et al. 2014). The known exoplanets form three apparently distinct groups in the mass-period diagram: cold Jupiters with or- bital periods (cid:38) 100 days; hot Jupiters with orbital periods (cid:46) 10 days; super-Earths/Neptunes with periods between 2 (cid:46) P (cid:46) 100 days. These features are affected by a number of observational biases, including the fact that ground based transit surveys are only sensitive to Jupiters with periods (cid:46) 10 days. Nonetheless, analysis of the period distribution of planets detected only by radial velocities seems to con- firm that there is a real valley in the distribution between 10–100 days (Udry et al. 2003; Cumming et al. 2008). More recently, Santerne et al. (2015) have presented an analysis of giant planets discovered by the Kepler spacecraft that were followed-up using radial velocity measurements over 6 years, and they confirm that the period-valley also exists within this data set. One of the most striking features when comparing the results of the simulations with the observa- tional data in Fig. 6 is the fact that the giant planets formed in the simulations are almost all hot Jupiters (periods < 10 days) and cold Jupiters (periods > 100 days), with only a few massive bodies being located in the region that corre- sponds to the observed period valley. Furthermore, the sim- ulations produce numerous planets with masses in the range MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) Giant planet formation in structured discs 11 Figure 6. Left panel: Mass vs period plot, comparing observed exoplanets (red squares) with our simulation results (blue circles) and the Solar System planets (black diamonds). Right panel: Same as left panel but data taken from Coleman & Nelson (2016). The grey zones indicate the habitable zone (Kasting et al. 1993). The arrows at the bottom of the left panel indicate the average positions of the four radial structures. 0.5 M⊕ (cid:46) mp (cid:46) 30 M⊕ and periods between 2 (cid:46) P (cid:46) 100 days, that correspond to the observed super-Earths and Nep- tunes. Some of these lower mass planets are in systems that contain giant planets, as described in the previous section for run CJ120.1210A, and some are devoid of any giants. Comparing the left panel of Fig. 6 with the right panel (a reproduction of Fig. 12 in Coleman & Nelson (2016)), where similar N-body simulations, but without the inclusion of disc radial structures, were presented, we see that the agreement between the observed and simulated planet distributions is much improved in this work. In the simulations, the origin of the two distinct popula- tions of hot and cold Jupiters, and the period valley between them, can be explained as follows. Giant planets that form early in the disc lifetime migrate all the way into the mag- netospheric cavity, and become hot Jupiters. Giant planets that are destined to not become hot Jupiters must form near the end of the disc lifetime, when photoevaporation plays an important role in the disc evolution. Photoevap- oration, combined with viscous evolution, causes the disc to disperse from the inside out. There is a high probability that a giant forming towards the end of the disc lifetime will migrate towards the star when the disc interior to the critical radius for photoevaporation has been fully or par- tially evacuated, preventing it from migrating close to the star, and ensuring that it remains as a cold Jupiter. Hence, the observed giant planet period distribution may arise as a combination of forming giant planets at large radius, hav- ing a stopping mechanism for migration at the inner edge of the disc (i.e. a magnetospheric cavity) and the inclusion of photoevaporation, which occurs outside a well-defined ra- dius corresponding roughly to where a thermal wind can be launched. The influence of different models of photoevapo- ration on the results are discussed in more detail below, but we note that Alexander & Pascucci (2012) have suggested that disc clearing due to photoevaporation can be responsi- ble for a pile-up of giant planets at 1 au, as planet migration is slowed when photoevaporation begins to dominate disc evolution. More recently Ercolano & Rosotti (2015) showed that different models of photoevaporation influence the pile- MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) up location, with a thermal-wind launching inner radius of 1–2 au being preferred. Low mass, compact systems that formed and migrated to the inner regions of the disc are seen in a number of simulations. The formation of these compact systems occurs similarly to those described in Coleman & Nelson (2016), but some compact systems within this work contained giant planets with large orbital periods, as shown in sect. 3.1. The co-existence of long period giant planets and low mass com- pact systems in the simulation results seems to be in accord with the recent analysis of Kepler data indicating the pres- ence of long period giant planets around stars known to host compact multi-systems (Uehara et al. 2016; Kipping et al. 2016). 3.2.2 Eccentricities of giant planets The eccentricity distribution of observed giant (mp sin i ≥ 100 M⊕) exoplanets is shown in Fig. 7 for bodies with orbital periods > 10 days, along with the eccentricity distribution for planets in the same mass and period range that form in the simulations. It is clear that the eccentricity distribu- tion associated with observed exoplanets is much broader than that generated in the simulations. The maximum ec- centricity for a giant planet obtained in the simulations was ep = 0.13, whereas significant numbers of exoplanets are observed to have eccentricities > 0.3. We note that those simulated systems that resulted in modestly eccentric giants did so because the giant planets underwent strong gravita- tional scattering with other planets in the system, where the scattered bodies typically had masses (cid:39) 20 M⊕. Scattering between more massive bodies is required to obtain the larger eccentricities observed in the exoplanet data (e.g. Rasio & Ford 1996). Given that our simulations end after 10 Myr, it is pos- sible that dynamical instabilities could occur on longer time scales in systems containing multiple giant planets, changing the statistics shown in Fig. 7. We have examined the distri- bution of mutual semimajor axis separations, expressed as a function of mutual Hill radii, to determine whether or not 12 G. A. L. Coleman and R. P. Nelson Figure 7. Distribution of observed giant exoplanet eccentricities (blue) and the distribution arising from the simulations (red). this is possible. We note that Marzari & Weidenschilling (2002) examined the dynamical stability of three Jovian- mass planets on initially circular orbits, and demonstrated that the instability time scale for such a system scales with the mutual Hill radius separation, with systems separated by ∼ 6 mutual Hill radii having instability times of ∼ 109 yr. All of our systems are at least as separated as this, with approx- imately half of the systems having semimajor axis separa- tions between 6 and 12 mutual Hill radii, and the other half being more separated. This suggests that some of the simu- lated systems may undergo dynamical instabilities on time scales longer than 10 Myr, but it seems highly unlikely that running the simulations for Gyr time scales would result in an eccentricity distribution that matches the observed one. Assuming that the observed eccentricity distribution of giant exoplanets arises primarily because of dynamical in- stabilities in multiplanet systems, and using the observed distribution as a constraint on viable formation scenarios, the data suggest that giant planets must often form in com- pact configurations, and do so more frequently than occurs in our simulations. Finally, we note that our simulations adopt a highly simplified prescription for the eccentricity damping experi- enced by gap forming planets, namely that the eccentricity is damped on a time scale of ∼ 10 planet orbits. This is applied independently of the mass remaining in the gas disc, and so acts to bias our final systems towards having low eccentrici- ties by reducing the likelihood of instabilities occurring while the gas disc is present. It is clear that a more sophisticated model will need to be adopted in future simulations if a more realistic assessment of the ability of the models to generate high eccentricity systems is to be undertaken. 3.3 Different photoevaporation models 3.3.1 Direct photoevaporation Simulation CJ120.1210A, presented in sect. 3.1, was one of a group of simulations that allowed direct photoevaporation Figure 8. Normalised cumulative distribution functions of giant planet periods for radial velocity (black dashed line) and Kepler observed giant planets (black dot-dash line), and simulations with different photoevaporation regimes; direct (blue line), standard (green line), and none (red line). We define a giant planet in both simulations and observations as a planet with mass mp ≥ 100 M⊕. to impact the disc when the gas disc interior to the critical radius had accreted onto the central star. This can occur when a gap forming planet forms exterior to the critical photoevaporation radius, and the inner disc drains onto the star. In this scenario, the giant planet assists its own survival against migration by stimulating the onset of direct photo- evaporation and reducing the disc lifetime. Fig. 8 compares the cumulative distributions of giant planet periods from simulations with different photoevaporation models (colored lines) and observations (black lines). When comparing the observations, it is evident that for giant planets observed by Kepler, the ratio of hot Jupiters to cold Jupiters is lower than that found by radial velocity surveys. One possible reason for this is that the average of the metallicities of the Kepler stars is -0.18 dex (Huber et al. 2014), and this is lower than for stars in the solar neighbourhood where the average is -0.08 dex (Sousa et al. 2008). Comparing the observations with our simulations, it is clear that the blue line, repre- senting simulations with direct photoevaporation, compares very reasonably with the observations, albeit with a higher fraction of hot Jupiters. Given that the simulations shown here have an average metallicity of 0.3 dex, the increased ratio is perhaps unsurprising, given that the boost in solid material can allow more rapid planet formation and there- fore more time for migration. The period valley discussed above is also evident here, as is the good agreement between the simulated and observed cold Jupiter distributions. Having observed the effect that direct photoevapora- tion has on the survival of giant planets with long orbital periods, we ran a further two sets of simulations with the same parameters as described in sect. 2.4, but with differ- ent photoevaporation models, the standard one (obtained by just switching off direct photoevaporation) and no photoe- vaporation, in order to examine their effects on giant planet formation. The results of all simulations with disc mass 1× MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) MMSN, metallicity 2× solar and α = 2× 10−3 are shown by the red (no photoevaporation) and green (standard) lines in Fig. 8 and are discussed in the following sections. 3.3.2 Standard photoevaporation Given that only a modest number of our simulations contain- ing large (cid:38) 1 km planetesimals formed giant planets, we only ran simulations with 10 m boulders or 100 m planetesimals to examine the influence of switching off direct photoevapo- ration and retaining the standard photoevaporation model. We note that when comparing the results of simulations that employed standard and direct photoevaporation mod- els, evolution of the disc and planets are identical until the time that direct photoevaporation is activated. This means that the formation pathways of giant planets is similar, and significant differences only arise for those cases where giant planet formation and migration occurs near to the end of the disc lifetime, when photoevaporation is strongly influ- encing the disc evolution. Direct photoevaporation causes the disc to be removed more rapidly, and so is more effec- tive at stranding migrating planets at larger orbital radii. Planets that form and migrate in discs with standard pho- toevaporation are therefore more likely to form hot Jupiters, as indicated in Fig. 8. 3.3.3 No photoevaporation In this set of simulations, we neglect photoevaporation en- tirely, such that the only processes that can deplete the gas disc are viscous evolution and accretion onto planets, signif- icantly increasing disc lifetimes and the time periods over which migration can occur. We consider only models con- taining 10 m boulders and 100 m planetesimals. The early formation and evolution of giant planets is similar to that seen in simulations with photoevaporation. Once a giant planet forms, however, the lack of an effective disc removal mechanism means that it will almost always migrate all the way to becoming a hot Jupiter, as shown by the red line in Fig. 8, where 95% of the giant planets formed are hot Jupiters. The giant planets that remain as cold Jupiters only did so because they formed late in the disc lifetime, where they survived migration by accreting the majority of the remaining gas disc. This ratio of hot Jupiters to cold Jupiters is not consistent with observations, and shows that recreating the observed distributions of giant planets is extremely difficult without a mechanism for disc dispersal. 3.4 Evolution as a function of model parameters We now discuss the effects that varying the model param- eters have on the formation and evolution of giant planets in the simulations. Since these effects are consistent across all photoevaporation models employed, we will only discuss the simulations that include direct photoevaporation. Fig. 9 shows the cumulative distributions for simulated planets as a function of the different parameters considered. MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) Giant planet formation in structured discs 13 3.4.1 Disc mass and metallicity The simulation results show a strong dependence on the ini- tial mass and metallicity of the disc. Simulations with small disc masses and sub-solar metallicities (e.g. 1× MMSN and 0.5× solar metallicity) are unable to form any giant planets, due to the quantity of solid material in the disc being insuf- ficient to form a massive planet core capable of accreting a massive gas envelope during the disc life time. Increasing the inventory of solids by increasing the total disc mass, or by increasing the metallicity, leads to the formation of giants. We see from Fig. 9 that the 1× MMSN, 2× solar metallicity runs form moderate numbers of hot Jupiters, with 90% of the giant planets having periods > 100 days. This is for the following reasons: the planet cores form quite late in the disc lifetime; the disc lifetime is shorter than for heavier discs; the low disc mass leads to slower type I migration. Increas- ing the disc mass and metallicity can be seen to dramatically increase the numbers of hot Jupiters, as planet cores form earlier, type I migration is faster and the disc lifetime is longer. Models with disc mass 2× MMSN and metallicity 2× solar form numerous giant planets, and 80% of these are hot Jupiters. 3.4.2 Planetesimal radii The cumulative distributions for the giant planet orbital pe- riods formed in simulations with different planetesimal radii are shown in the top-right panel of Fig. 9. No giant plan- ets formed in simulations where the planetesimal size was 10 km, in agreement with the very anaemic growth found in Coleman & Nelson (2016) for models with 10 km planetes- imals. Large planetesimals do not migrate very far through the disc during its lifetime, and the relatively weak damping means that their accretion rate onto planetary embryos re- mains small because of their large velocity dispersion. Accre- tion rates are slightly higher for 1 km planetesimals, leading to 12 giant planets forming in these runs. Overall, only ∼ 5% of all giant planets formed do so in simulations with 1 or 10 km sized planetesimals (half of all runs). When the plan- etesimal radius is decreased to 100 m, or we consider 10 m boulders, then giant planets form easily. Coleman & Nelson (2016) found that planetary growth is efficient in the pres- ence of small bodies that experience strong gas drag, since they can migrate over large distances (helping growing em- bryos to exceed their local isolation masses), and maintain a relative modest velocity dispersion due to strong eccentricity and inclination damping. Our inclusion of radial structures allows small planetesimals and boulders to concentrate, and growing embryos to avoid rapid inward migration. Hence, the simulations form surviving giant planets with a broad range of orbital periods. Similar numbers of giant planets formed in simulations with 10 m and 100 m small bodies, while their orbital period distribution (i.e. number of hot Jupiters versus cold Jupiters) was also similar, as is shown by the cumulative distributions in the top-right panel of Fig. 9. 3.4.3 α viscosity The bottom-left panel of Fig. 9 shows that a lower viscosity (i.e. mass accretion rate through the disc for a given disc 14 G. A. L. Coleman and R. P. Nelson Figure 9. Normalised cumulative distributions of simulated giant planets as a function of different parameters. Top-left panel: Disc mass and metallicity. Top-right panel: Planetesimal radii. Bottom-left panel: α parameter. Bottom-right panel: Radial structure lifetimes. Bracketed values represent the number of giant planets in those cumulative distributions. We define a giant planet in both simulations and observations as a planet with mass mp ≥ 100 M⊕. mass) gives rise to a larger ratio of hot to cold Jupiters. This is an effect of the shorter disc lifetimes associated with more viscous discs, by approximately 2 Myr in our simulations. A closely related effect is that the numbers of giant planets that form in higher viscosity discs is lower than in lower viscosity discs: 88 formed in the α = 6 × 10−3 runs versus 106 in the α = 2 × 10−3 simulations. 3.4.4 Radial structure lifetime The cumulative distributions of orbital period for runs with different assumed lifetimes for the disc radial structures are shown in the bottom-right panel of Fig. 9. It is clear that varying these lifetimes between 104 and 105 local orbit pe- riods has very little influence on the results. We expect that shorter lifetimes than those considered in the runs would reduce the numbers of giant planets that form, since more growing cores could escape from the outer disc regions and migrate rapidly into the inner magnetospheric cavity before becoming giants. It is also likely that the mass distribution of the giants would be skewed towards lower masses, and the ratio of hot to cold Jupiters would increase. By decreasing the lifetimes of the radial structures to very short values we would eventually converge towards the results presented in Coleman & Nelson (2016), where all surviving giant planets were hot Jupiters and had sub-Jovian masses. 3.5 Planetary system architectures We find a diversity in the planetary system architectures arising from the simulations. An ensemble of simulated planetary systems displaying different architectures are shown in Fig. 10, where the different architectures are represented by different simulation label prefixes. Below we describe the different architectures, and the general physical conditions and modes of evolution associated with each of them: (i) Low-mass planetary systems – These form in simulations where protoplanet growth rates are insufficient to form giant planets. In some cases these are compact planetary systems, with similar formation histories to those discussed in Coleman & Nelson (2016). The systems with the prefix 'CS' (compact system) in Fig. 10 show the final configu- rations from these runs, where the lack of massive planets is evident along with their compactness. Generally, these systems arose in metal-poor low-mass discs with small planetesimals/boulders, or in more massive discs with large planetesimals (i.e. Rpl ≥ 1 km). (ii) Lonely hot Jupiters – Systems containing only hot Jupiters formed in massive metal-rich discs. Typically multiple giant planets form in the outer regions of the disc and migrate to become hot Jupiters, where only the last hot Jupiter survives. Often accompanying these hot Jupiters are low-mass planets on long period orbits (Pp ≥ 100d), as shown by systems with prefixes 'HJ' (hot Jupiters) in Fig. MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) Giant planet formation in structured discs 15 Figure 10. Plot comparing different architectures arising from the simulations, with the Solar System and Kepler-167 included for comparison. Orbital period is indicated on the x-axis and planet masses are indicated by the symbol size (radius scales with the square- root of the planet mass). The symbol colours indicate the classification of each planet: red = Earths (mp < 3 M⊕); green = super-Earths (3 M⊕ ≤ mp < 10 M⊕); blue = Neptunes (10 M⊕ ≤ mp < 35 M⊕); orange = super-Neptunes (35 M⊕ ≤ mp < 100 M⊕); black = Jupiters and super-Jupiters (mp > 100 M⊕). See Table 3 for definitions of planet types. MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) 16 G. A. L. Coleman and R. P. Nelson 10. From an observational perspective, the low mass and long orbital periods of these companions would make the hot Jupiters appear singular. (iii) Hot Jupiters with cold Jupiter companions – Similar to the lonely hot Jupiters, planetary systems that contain both hot and cold Jupiters tend to arise from solids-rich discs. Hot Jupiters form early in the disc lifetime and migrate close to the central star, whilst late forming giant planets have insufficient time to migrate into the inner system, retaining long orbital periods as cold Jupiters. Typically, lower mass planets are found to occupy the space between the hot and cold Jupiters. Examples of these systems are shown in Fig. 10 by the prefix 'MJ' (multiple Jupiters), showing the diversity in planetary compositions in these systems. (iv) Cold Jupiters with low-mass companions – When there is sufficient solid material in the disc, we find that giant planets can form simultaneously with inner systems of low mass planets. The late formation of giant planets enables them to remain as cold Jupiters at the end of the disc lifetime, whilst interior low-mass planets slowly accrete and migrate into the inner disc regions, becoming an inner system of low-mass planets, occasionally in a compact configuration. This architecture is similar to that found in the Solar System, and we note that recent analysis of Kepler light-curves indicates the existence of long period giant planets orbiting stars with known compact low mass systems, similar to our simulated cold Jupiters with short period low mass companions (Uehara et al. 2016; Kipping et al. 2016). This planetary system architecture is shown by systems with the prefix 'CJ' (cold Jupiters) in Fig. 10. 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS We have presented the results of N-body simulations cou- pled with prescriptions for planetary migration, accretion of gaseous envelopes, self-consistent evolution of a viscous disc with an inner magnetospheric cavity and disc removal by a photoevaporative wind on multi-Myr time scales. A new ad- dition, not considered in our previous simulations (Coleman & Nelson 2014, 2016), is radial structuring of the disc due to variations in the viscous stresses, leading to the forma- tion of persistent planet traps at large orbital radii from the star. The main results from our study can be summarised as follows: (i) Radial structuring of the disc allows gas giant planets to form. Protoplanets and planetesimals become trapped at the outer edges of the radial structures, due to strong corotation torques and positive pressure gradients, respec- tively. Giant planet cores capable of accreting gaseous en- velopes are able to form due to efficient accretion of plan- etesimals/boulders by planetary embryos. Out of 288 simu- lations, 132 surviving giant planets were formed by having their cores trapped by radial structures. The final periods de- pend on the time and location of formation, as discussed in Coleman & Nelson (2014), where early forming giant planets became hot Jupiters, and late forming giant planets remain as cold Jupiters. (ii) When analysing the effects of changing specific parame- ters, we identify the following trends: – In solid-poor simulations (low disc mass and metallicity) no giant planets are formed, as there is insufficient solid ma- terial to form giant planet cores. This is in agreement with the observations of Fischer & Valenti (2005) and Santos et al. (2004), where giant planets are preferentially found around metal-rich stars. – When the planetesimal radii are large (≥ 1km), giant plan- ets are unable to form except in the most solids-rich envi- ronments. Giant planet formation is strongly favoured in models where the primary feedstock of planetary growth is in the form of small 100 m sized planetesimals or 10 m sized boulders. 95% of the giant planets that formed did so in simulations with small boulders/planetesimals. None were formed in models with 10 km planetesimals. – We find that discs with higher viscosity form fewer giant planets than low viscosity discs, and the ratio of hot to cold Jupiters in higher viscosity discs is smaller than in lower viscosity discs. These effects are entirely due to the shorter disc lifetimes associated with higher viscosity. (iii) Multiple giant planets are able to form when there is sufficient solid material. This occurred in numerous simu- lations with high disc masses and metallicities, resulting in systems with multiple cold Jupiters, or a hot Jupiter with cold Jupiter companions. The survival rate of warm Jupiters (those with periods between 10–100 d) also depends on the presence of outer giant companions. Outer giant planet com- panions can stem the flow of gas into the inner system, re- ducing the migration rate of planets in the inner system and allowing them to survive at longer periods than if there were no exterior giant planets. (iv) Our simulations reproduce the giant planet period valley between 10 and 100 days that is seen in the observed period distribution of giant planets. Our analysis shows that this arises because of the inclusion of disc removal by photoevap- oration in our simulations. The launching of a photoevapo- rative wind causes the disc to empty from the inside out at the end of its lifetime, causing the migration of planets to stall at periods > 100 days, an effect that has been discussed previously by Alexander & Pascucci (2012) and Ercolano & Rosotti (2015). (v) Our simulations do not reproduce the broad eccentricity distribution of the observed giant exoplanets, and this is ap- parently because our multiple giant planet systems are too well separated to undergo dynamical instabilities that lead to the formation of eccentric orbits. We note, however, that our use of a simple model for damping the eccentricity of gap forming planets in the presence of the gas disc may also bias the simulations towards producing low eccentricity systems. A definitive conclusion about the ability of our models to form a population of eccentric giants can only be made once an improved prescription for this has been implemented. A further point that is worth making is that systems of mul- tiple giant planets form in the simulations when the system metallicity is high (as described above). Assuming that the primary mechanism leading to the observed giant exoplan- ets attaining their eccentric orbits was dynamical instability in multiplanet systems (possibly on time scales much longer than the formation time scales that we have considered), we note that this (not unexpected) correlation between metal- licity and the multiplicity of giant planets that form in the simulations may also explain the positive correlation that exists between eccentricity and stellar metallicity for giant MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) exoplanets discovered by radial velocity surveys. 1 We note that this correlation has also been pointed out by Dawson & Murray-Clay (2013). (vi) Numerous compact systems of super-Earths and Nep- tunes were formed in the simulations, with formation histo- ries similar to those discussed in Coleman & Nelson (2016). If there was sufficient solid material, long period giant planets also formed in the same simulations as the compact systems of super-Earths/Neptunes. The simulations we have presented here show that giant planets can form in discs containing radial structures that act as planet traps, while the combination of magnetospheric cavities and photoevaporative winds creates two populations of giant planets: hot Jupiters and cold Jupiters. It is likely that in more realistic discs, the location, size and evolution of radial structures will be quite different from what we have examined in this work. Running a full parameter study on the effects of radial structures in protoplanetary discs, how- ever, goes beyond the scope of this study, which is intended to be a proof of concept rather than an exhaustive survey of parameter space. Whilst this and recent work (Coleman & Nelson 2016) can more or less explain some of the diversity observed in exoplanetary system architectures, it is by no means com- plete. Further improvements to the model are required to enhance the accuracy and realism currently provided by sim- ple assumptions. In future work we will aim to include the following improvements: (i) A full collision and fragmentation model, so that the outcomes of planet-planet and planet-planetesimal collisions can be accurately modelled, instead of the current assump- tion of perfect mergers. In addition to accounting for effects arising from impacts between solid bodies, it will also be important to incorporate a model for the post-collision evo- lution of gaseous envelopes (Liu et al. 2015a,b). (ii) Incorporating a more realistic migration model that takes into account 3D effects (Fung et al. 2015), the in- fluence of planet luminosity (Ben´ıtez-Llambay et al. 2015) and dynamical torques arising from the planet's migration (Paardekooper 2014; Pierens 2015). (iii) Calculation of gas envelope accretion using self- consistent calculations that include the effects of changing local disc conditions and planetesimal accretion rates, rather than using fits to the Movshovitz et al. (2010) models that strictly apply only to planets at fixed locations in a non- evolving disc with specifically prescribed planetesimal ac- cretion rates. (iv) Incorporating fits to MHD simulations so that disc ra- dial structures arising from zonal flows and transitions be- tween magnetically active and dead zones can be included in a more realistic fashion. (v) Incorporating an improved model for the eccentricity evolution of gap forming planets. At present the model sim- ply assumes eccentricity damping on a time scale of ∼ 10 orbital periods, independent of the mass contained in the disc (although the damping is removed after disc removal). This biases our systems towards low eccentricity, and pre- 1 This correlation may be seen by plotting eccentricity versus stellar metallicity using the data on radial velocity planets avail- able at exoplanets.org MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) Giant planet formation in structured discs 17 vents us from properly assessing whether or not the sim- ulations that we have presented are able to reproduce the eccentricity distribution of the observed giant exoplanets. Finally, it is important to emphasise that this study is not an exercise in population synthesis, as we have not cho- sen initial conditions (e.g. disc masses, disc lifetimes) from observationally motivated distribution functions. Instead we have simply sought to examine what conditions are required to form giant planets whose gross orbital characteristics are similar to the observed distribution. Once our model be- comes more sophisticated we will examine whether or not it is capable of reproducing the observed distribution of exo- planets with appropriate choices of initial conditions. REFERENCES ALMA Partnership et al., 2015, ApJ Letters, 808, L3 Alexander R. D., Armitage P. J., 2009, ApJ, 704, 989 Alexander R. D., Pascucci I., 2012, MNRAS, 422, 82 Alibert Y., et al., 2006, A&A, 455, L25 Andrews S. M., et al., 2016, ApJ Letters, 820, L40 Bai X.-N., Stone J. M., 2014, ApJ, 796, 31 Balbus S. A., Hawley J. F., 1991, ApJ, 376, 214 Becker J. C., Vanderburg A., Adams F. C., Rappaport S. A., Schwengeler H. M., 2015, ApJ Letters, 812, L18 Ben´ıtez-Llambay P., Masset F., Koenigsberger G., Szul´agyi J., 2015, Nature, 520, 63 B´ethune W., Lesur G., Ferreira J., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1603.02475) Bitsch B., Kley W., 2011, A&A, 536, A77 Bitsch B., Johansen A., Lambrechts M., Morbidelli A., 2015a, A&A, 575, A28 Bitsch B., Lambrechts M., Johansen A., 2015b, A&A, 582, A112 Cassan A., et al., 2012, Nature, 481, 167 Chambers J. E., 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793 Coleman G. A. L., Nelson R. P., 2014, MNRAS, 445, 479 Coleman G. A. L., Nelson R. P., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 2480 Cossou C., Raymond S. N., Pierens A., 2013, A&A, 553, L2 Cresswell P., Nelson R. P., 2008, A&A, 482, 677 Crida A., Morbidelli A., Masset F., 2006, Icarus, 181, 587 Cumming A., Butler R. P., Marcy G. W., Vogt S. S., Wright J. T., Fischer D. A., 2008, PASP, 120, 531 Dawson R. I., Murray-Clay R. A., 2013, ApJ Letters, 767, L24 Desch S. J., Turner N. J., 2015, ApJ, 811, 156 Dipierro G., Price D., Laibe G., Hirsh K., Cerioli A., Lodato G., 2015, MNRAS, 453, 73 Dittrich K., Klahr H., Johansen A., 2013, ApJ, 763, 117 Duffell P. C., Haiman Z., MacFadyen A. I., D'Orazio D. J., Farris B. D., 2014, ApJ Letters, 792, L10 Dullemond C. P., Hollenbach D., Kamp I., D'Alessio P., 2007, Protostars and Planets V, pp 555–572 Durmann C., Kley W., 2015, A&A, 574, A52 Ercolano B., Rosotti G., 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3008 Fendyke S. M., Nelson R. P., 2014, MNRAS, 437, 96 Fischer D. A., Valenti J., 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102 Flock M., Ruge J. P., Dzyurkevich N., Henning T., Klahr H., Wolf S., 2015, A&A, 574, 68 Fressin F., et al., 2013, ApJ, 766, 81 Fromang S., Nelson R. P., 2006, A&A, 457, 343 Fung J., Artymowicz P., Wu Y., 2015, ApJ, 811, 101 Han E., Wang S. X., Wright J. T., Feng Y. K., Zhao M., Fakhouri O., Brown J. I., Hancock C., 2014, PASP, 126, 827 Hasegawa Y., Pudritz R. E., 2011, MNRAS, 417, 1236 Hayashi C., 1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 70, 35 Hellary P., Nelson R. P., 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2737 18 G. A. L. Coleman and R. P. Nelson Huber D., et al., 2014, ApJS, 211, 2 Ida S., Lin D. N. C., 2004, ApJ, 616, 567 Inaba S., Ikoma M., 2003, A&A, 410, 711 Johansen A., Youdin A., Mac Low M.-M., 2009, ApJ Letters, 704, L75 Kasting J. F., Whitmire D. P., Reynolds R. T., 1993, Icarus, 101, 108 Kipping D. M., et al., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1603.00042) Levison H. F., Kretke K. A., Duncan M. J., 2015, Nature, 524, 322 Lin D. N. C., Papaloizou J., 1986, ApJ, 309, 846 Lissauer J. J., et al., 2011, Nature, 470, 53 Liu S.-F., Agnor C. B., Lin D. N. C., Li S.-L., 2015a, MNRAS, 446, 1685 Liu S.-F., Hori Y., Lin D. N. C., Asphaug E., 2015b, ApJ, 812, 164 Lodders K., 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220 Lynden-Bell D., Pringle J. E., 1974, MNRAS, 168, 603 Marzari F., Weidenschilling S. J., 2002, Icarus, 156, 570 Masset F. S., Morbidelli A., Crida A., Ferreira J., 2006, ApJ, 642, 478 Mayor M., Queloz D., 1995, Nature, 378, 355 Mordasini C., Alibert Y., Benz W., 2009, A&A, 501, 1139 Movshovitz N., Bodenheimer P., Podolak M., Lissauer J. J., 2010, Icarus, 209, 616 Muirhead P. S., et al., 2012, ApJ, 747, 144 Nayakshin S., 2015, MNRAS, 454, 64 Neveu-VanMalle M., et al., 2016, A&A, 586, A93 Okuzumi S., Momose M., Sirono S.-i., Kobayashi H., Tanaka H., 2015, preprint, (arXiv:1510.03556) Paardekooper S.-J., 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2031 Paardekooper S.-J., Baruteau C., Crida A., Kley W., 2010, MN- RAS, 401, 1950 Paardekooper S.-J., Baruteau C., Kley W., 2011, MNRAS, 410, 293 Papaloizou J. C. B., Nelson R. P., 2003, MNRAS, 339, 983 Picogna G., Kley W., 2015, preprint Pierens A., 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2003 Pinilla P., Birnstiel T., Ricci L., Dullemond C. P., Uribe A. L., Testi L., Natta A., 2012, A&A, 538, A114 Rasio F. A., Ford E. B., 1996, Science, 274, 954 Santerne A., et al., 2015, preprint, (arXiv:1511.00643) Santos N. C., Israelian G., Mayor M., 2004, A&A, 415, 1153 Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, A&A, 24, 337 Simon J. B., Beckwith K., Armitage P. J., 2012, MNRAS, 422, 2685 Sousa S. G., et al., 2008, A&A, 487, 373 Steinacker A., Papaloizou J. C. B., 2002, ApJ, 571, 413 Udry S., Mayor M., Santos N. C., 2003, A&A, 407, 369 Uehara S., Kawahara H., Masuda K., Yamada S., Aizawa M., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1602.07848) Umebayashi T., Nakano T., 1988, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 96, 151 Weidenschilling S. J., 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57 Zhang K., Blake G. A., Bergin E. A., 2015, ApJ Letters, 806, 7 Zhang K., Bergin E. A., Blake G. A., Cleeves L. I., Hogerheijde M., Salinas V., Schwarz K. R., 2016, ApJ Letters, 818, L16 Zhu Z., Stone J. M., Rafikov R. R., Bai X.-n., 2014, ApJ, 785, 122 MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)
1210.4827	2	1210	2013-01-31T19:25:33	A Possible Divot in the Size Distribution of the Kuiper Belt's Scattering Objects	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Via joint analysis of a calibrated telescopic survey, which found scattering Kuiper Belt objects, and models of their expected orbital distribution, we measure the form of the scattering object's size distribution. Ruling out a single power-law at greater than 99% confidence, we constrain the form of the size distribution and find that, surprisingly, our analysis favours a very sudden decrease (a divot) in the number distribution as diameters decrease below 100 km, with the number of smaller objects then rising again as expected via collisional equilibrium. Extrapolating at this collisional equilibrium slope produced enough kilometer-scale scattering objects to supply the nearby Jupiter-Family comets. Our interpretation is that this divot feature is a preserved relic of the size distribution made by planetesimal formation, now "frozen in" to portions of the Kuiper Belt sharing a "hot" orbital inclination distribution, explaining several puzzles in Kuiper Belt science. Additionally, we show that to match today's scattering-object inclination distribution, the supply source that was scattered outward must have already been vertically heated to of order 10 degrees.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	A Possible Divot in the Size Distribution of the Kuiper Belt's Scattering Objects C. Shankman, B. J. Gladman, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1 N. Kaib Department of Physics and Astronomy, Queens University, Canada Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, National Research Council of Canada, Victoria, BC, J.J. Kavelaars Canada and J.M. Petit Institut UTINAM, CNRS-Universit´e de Franche-Comt´e, Besan¸con, France Received ; accepted 3 1 0 2 n a J 1 3 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 7 2 8 4 . 0 1 2 1 : v i X r a -- 2 -- ABSTRACT Via joint analysis of a calibrated telescopic survey, which found scattering Kuiper Belt objects, and models of their expected orbital distribution, we explore the scattering-object size distribution. Although for D >100 km the number of objects quickly rise as diameters decrease, we find a relative lack of smaller ob- jects, ruling out a single power-law at greater than 99% confidence. After study- ing traditional "knees" in the size distribution, we explore other formulations and find that, surprisingly, our analysis is consistent with a very sudden decrease (a divot) in the number distribution as diameters decrease below 100 km, which then rises again as a power-law. Motivated by other dynamically hot populations and the Centaurs, we argue for a divot size distribution where the number of smaller objects rises again as expected via collisional equilibrium. Extrapolation yields enough kilometer-scale scattering objects to supply the nearby Jupiter-Family comets. Our interpretation is that this divot feature is a preserved relic of the size distribution made by planetesimal formation, now "frozen in" to portions of the Kuiper Belt sharing a "hot" orbital inclination distribution, explaining sev- eral puzzles in Kuiper Belt science. Additionally, we show that to match today's scattering-object inclination distribution, the supply source that was scattered outward must have already been vertically heated to of order 10◦. Subject headings: comets: general -- Kuiper belt: general -- 3 -- 1. Introduction Measurements of the Kuiper Belt's size distribution (number at each diameter D) constrain accretional processes at planet formation and, potentially, subsequent collisional or physical evolution. Because astronomers observe brightnesses rather than D, object absolute magnitudes H are tabulated as the observable proxy for the size distribution. Collisional and accretional theories suggest exponential forms for the N(H) distribution. A differential number distribution of the form dN/dH ∝ 10αHg with a logarithmic 'slope' α corresponds to a power-law D distribution dN/dD ∝ D−(5α+1). Although power-law D distributions provide acceptable fits to Kuiper Belt surveys over spans of a few magnitudes in H, departures from single power-laws are necessary over larger H ranges (Jewitt et al. 1988; Gladman et al. 2001; Bernstein et al. 2004; Fuentes & Holman 2008; Fraser & Kavelaars 2008). For the steep (α=0.8 -- 1.2) distributions seen in the Kuiper Belt, detections are dominated by objects near the largest H magnitude (smallest size) visible in a given survey. An α > 0.6 slope cannot continue as H → ∞ (D → 0 km) or the total mass diverges; thus a slope change (generically called a break) is required. Evidence of such a break now exists for trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) in the main Kuiper Belt (at distances d ≃ 38 -- 46 AU), both near the sensitivity limit of ground-based telescopic surveys (Fraser & Kavelaars 2008; Fuentes & Holman 2008) (reaching Hg ∼9 -- 10 at 40 AU) and from deeper HST (Bernstein et al. 2004) observations (Hg ∼13 at 40 AU). This break has been modelled as a gradual transition to a smaller value of α, a "knee". Probing a break is difficult because small TNOs are faint. This problem is reduced when observing the scattering objects (SOs); these are mostly TNOs with perihelia q ≤ 35 AU (see below) and thus smaller objects are detectable while near the Sun. At any time some SOs are only d = 20 -- 30 AU away, allowing a 4-m telescope, in excellent conditions, to detect objects down to Hg ∼ 12. For a monotonically increasing -- 4 -- number distribution N(Hg), the abundant small objects at the observable volume's innermost edge should dominate the detected sample. This is not what our survey found (Fig. 1), necessitating a relative lack of small SOs. We discarded a sudden (ad-hoc) albedo change, as it would produce a gap in H-space, not a drop, which does not match the observations; the needed change is a sudden lack of Hg > 9 (and therefore small) SOs. 2. Models Several models of the SO orbital element distribution were exposed to the calibrated observational biases of the Canada France Ecliptic Plane Survey (CFEPS) in order to quantitatively constrain the intrinsic N(Hg) distribution. Drawing SOs from an orbital distribution model, and selecting Hg from a candidate N(Hg) distribution, the CFEPS survey simulator (Jones et al. 2006) determines each object's observability and produces a set of "simulated detections" expected from the model. Two different SO orbital models are from a modified version of Kaib et al. (2011b) (henceforth KRQ11). KRQ11 focuses on the effects of solar migration in the Milky Way on Oort Cloud structure. While this is not the focus of the current work, we can use the KRQ11 control calculations, which assume an unchanging local galactic environment. To test the sensitivity of our results to the dynamical context, we performed the same analysis on an independent model. Gladman & Chan (2006) modelled the scattering of objects in an initial Solar System having an additional planet of order Earth mass. As previously reported (Petit et al. 2011) this model also (perhaps surprisingly) satisfactorily represents the current SO (a, q) distribution, although too "cold" in inclinations. In fact, this model and the cold KRQ11 model produced very similar results, showing that our -- 5 -- conclusions are mostly insensitive to the assumed Solar System history. Objects currently in the Centaur and detectable SO region (mostly a <200 AU) have, unsurprisingly, almost forgotten their initial state except for the the inclination distribution; the current SO orbital distribution is not diagnostic of the number and position of the planets early in the Solar System's history. 3. Observations CFEPS provided a set of detections of outer Solar System objects in a precisely calibrated survey (Jones et al. 2006; Kavelaars et al. 2009) whose pointing history, detection efficiency, and tracking performance were recorded. The final set of TNO detections (with full high-precision orbits) and the fully calibrated pointing history make up the L7 release (Petit et al. 2011). This absolute calibration of CFEPS allows a model of the present orbital (and size) distribution of to be passed through the CFEPS Survey Simulator, yielding a set of simulated detections whose orbital and Hg distributions can be compared to the real detections. The three models provide orbital distributions of all TNOs. The "scattering" TNOs are then selected out of the final 10 Myr stage of the model integrations using the criteria: variation of a >1.5 AU in semimajor axis during 10 Myr, with a < 1000 AU (Morbidelli et al. 2004; Gladman et al. 2008). Historically, a simple q cut was used to isolate the "scattered disk" (Duncan & Levison 1997; Luu et al. 1997; Trujillo et al. 2000), which has serious disadvantages when trying to discuss the cosmogony, as there is a nearly impossible distinction between implanted (and thus scattered) and the original Kuiper Belt population (if any). Perihelion divisions also undesirably includes resonant objects and most inner main-belt TNOs. -- 6 -- The CFEPS SO sample consists of 9 objects (Table 1), supplemented by two SOs discovered in a high-latitude extension survey (covering ≃ 470 sqdg in 2007 -- 2008, extending up to 65◦ ecliptic latitude), which was fully calibrated in the same way as CFEPS. To characterize the form of the N(Hg), we introduce a novel formulation, allowing for the exploration of distributions with knees and divots (a sudden drop in the differential number of objects followed by a recovery). We parameterised the Hg distribution (Fig. 2A) with the fixed slope αb = 0.8 (see below) for SOs brighter than a break at Hg = 9 (D ≃100 km), allowed an adjustable slope αf for fainter objects, and an adjustable contrast c ≥ 1. The Hg-magnitudes are drawn from one of three types of distributions: (1) a single exponential of logarithmic slope α, (2) N(Hg) with a knee (contrast c =1). That is, one slope αb for SOs with Hg < Hknee and αf for Hg > Hknee, where N(Hg) is continuous across the knee at Hknee and negative slopes αf are allowed as suggested (Bernstein et al. 2004), and (3) one slope αb to a divot at Hdivot, which is a sudden drop in differential number by a factor c, with a potentially different slope αf beyond the cliff at H = Hdivot. Although in reality the discontinuity is unlikely to be an instantaneous drop, our data do not merit trying to constrain the values of the expected steep negative slope and small extent over which it drops; collisional models (Fraser 2009; Campo Bagatin & Benavidez 2012) do show collisional divots where the drop occurs over D ranges of factors < 2 (a few tenths of magnitude in Hg). In principle there are four parameters: αb, αf , Hdivot, and c (Fig. 2). For Hg < 9 a single power-law of αb ≃ 0.8 does indeed match our detections; we elected to fix this slope at that value with the unifying philosophy that all the hot transneptunian populations share this same hot slope; αb = 0.8 matches both the hot Classical belt measured down to Hg ≃ 8.0 (Petit et al. 2011; Fraser & Kavelaars 2008; Fuentes & Holman 2008), and to the -- 7 -- 3:2 resonators measured down to Hg ≃ 9.0 (Gladman et al. 2012). Our detections require a transition around Hg =9 -- 10 to explain the relative lack of small detections; we thus fixed the knee/divot for our analysis at Hg = 9 (slightly larger than D=100 km for 5% g-band albedo). This leaves only two free parameters: the contrast c at the divot and the slope αf for absolute magnitudes fainter than the divot/knee. To assess a match, the Anderson-Darling (AD) statistic is calculated between our 11-object sample and the distribution of simulated detections from the model, for each orbital parameter. An AD significance level of < 5% rejects the hypothesis that the real SO observations could be drawn from the simulated detections at the 95% confidence level (for that orbital parameter). To retain a model, we required that none of the q, d, i, and Hg distributions are rejectable at > 95% confidence. 4. Absolute Magnitude Distribution The observational bias is strong (Fig. 1) , but when accurately calibrated allows us to constrain the Hg distribution's form. Single power-laws predict significantly more close-in detections than were seen by CFEPS; for a slope of α = 0.8, roughly half of the expected detections (Fig. 1 D's blue dashed curve) should have a distance at detection d < 23 AU, which is the closest real SO in our sample. The observationally biased models predict that the majority of detected SOs would have orbits with q <20 AU at d = 20 -- 25 AU and be small (Hg > 9 or D ≤ 100 km) objects, in contrast to our detections, which demonstrates that our observations are sensitive beyond the break. When confined to q > 25AU (where objects must be large to be seen) the orbital models provide good matches, however extensions to smaller distance fail when using a single power-law, pointing to a breakdown arising from the the assumed N(Hg). -- 8 -- We rule out a single power-law of slope 0.8 at 99% confidence, and can rule out all single power-laws with slope between 0 and 1.2 at 95% confidence. Slopes of 0.5 and 0.6 are not rejectable across the whole distribution, but are rejectable (95% confidence) when the distribution is considered in both Hg > 9 and Hg < 9 subsets; we demand these work because the steep slopes measured for other hot populations match our Hg < 9 detections well, and a shallower slope is erroneously found by measuring across a divot feature when requiring a single slope (see below). Our relatively small sample is powerful because our detected SOs span the break and, when coupled with the precise CFEPS calibration, allows the non-detection of Hg =10-12 SOs (several magnitudes past the divot) to provide a strong constraint on N(Hg). Down to this limit, CFEPS detected moving objects as close as 20 AU with no rate of motion dependence. Because our orbits are accurate, we can separate the SOs from the other hot populations, and use a dynamical model specific to the SOs. All of our N(Hg) cases have the obvious and previously-known problem that the model's orbital inclinations are mostly lower than the true population's (Petit et al. 2011; Gladman et al. 2012), even for the cases where the N(Hg) otherwise provides a good match. For example, Fig. 1 shows a divot (c ≃ 6, αf = 0.5) producing a good match between the model's expected detections (green curve) and the real SO sample (red), excepting the i problem. Models (Levison et al. 2008) which scatter out a cold TNO population (from d < 30 AU with initial inclination distribution widths σi ≤ 6◦) to eventually form today's hot population produce current TNO populations where too many low-i detections are expected in observational surveys (Fig. 1B). This is part of growing evidence that the original planetesimal disk supplying today's high-i objects must have already been vertically excited before being scattered out (Petit et al. 2011; Gladman et al. 2012; Brasser & Morbidelli 2012), which has strong cosmogonic implications for an extended -- 9 -- quiescent phase of the early Solar System (Levison et al. 2008). We therefore computed a new SO model with a hotter (σi ≃ 12◦) initial disk; this provides an excellent match with today's SO i-distribution (see Fig. 3) and we constrain N(Hg) below using this model. To constrain the size distribution, a grid of possible divot contrasts and post-divot slopes was explored. Fig. 4 shows acceptability levels for the range of explored parameter pairs (c, αf ). A single power-law of α = 0.8 (blue star Fig. 4) has < 1% probability. We are left with a range of acceptable parameter space, including knee (c=1) and divot (c >1) scenarios; we further constrain N(Hg) by looking to other Kuiper Belt populations. The so-called hot Kuiper Belt populations (the hot main belt, inner belt, resonant, and detached TNOs) share an i distribution half-width of roughly 15◦ (Petit et al. 2011) with the SOs, suggesting a cosmogonic link. In analyses of deep luminosity functions dominated by hot main-belt detections, the common conclusion (Bernstein et al. 2004; Fuentes et al. 2010) was that for magnitude g > 25 the slope must break to a faint αf < 0.3 value or even become negative in order to explain the lack of detections in the following few magnitudes; beyond this no data exists for the main Kuiper Belt. For SOs and their companion objects (Centaurs), however, many Hg ≫ 9 objects are known from wide-field surveys, mostly detected at d < 20 AU. In fact, measurements of Jupiter Family Comets (JFCs) in the Hg ≈14 -- 17 range give slopes αf ≃ 0.5 ± 0.1 (see Table 6 of Solontoi et al. (2012)). These two arguments mean the SO distribution cannot remain at αf < 0.3. leading us to discard knees to negative slopes. A divot can explain both a relative lack of objects beyond the break and the eventual recovery necessary to provide the JFCs. A divot also motivates the negative slopes measured, as a realistic divot will take the form of a decrease at the break, rather than the sharp discontinuity we use. We prefer the divot solution with αf =0.5 and c ≃6 (green star Fig. 4) which matches the observations and allows for a single slope αf = 0.5 from the divot out to the Hg >14 Jupiter Family comets whose slope is near the -- 10 -- collisional equilibrium value (O'Brien & Greenberg 2005). 5. External Arguments As the hot populations have similar colours and D > 100-km size distributions, it seems likely that they were all transplanted to join a pre-existing cold Kuiper Belt (Petit et al. 2011) during a common event early in the Solar System's history, and would thus logically share the same divot and small D distribution. Such a transplant process can successfully implant TNOs in the stable Kuiper Belt (Levison et al. 2008; Batygin et al. 2011), although the resonant population ratios and i distribution are problematic (Gladman et al. 2012). We thus look for evidence of such a feature in other hot populations. 5.1. The Neptune Trojans A search for Neptune Trojans (Sheppard & Trujillo 2010) provided significant evidence that an α ∼ 0.8 power-law cannot continue for D < 100-km Trojans; a divot was not apparent because Trojans significantly smaller were not detected. The dispersed Trojan inclination distribution (Sheppard & Trujillo 2006), although not yet precisely measured, links these objects to all the other resonant populations (Gladman et al. 2012). Sheppard & Trujillo (2010) used Neptune Trojan searches to argue that beyond mR ≃23 (corresponding to Hg ≃ 9) there was an absence of Trojans due to non-detections, and thus smaller Trojans were missing. Assuming that the Trojans and other resonant TNOs were implanted from a scattering population, and thus share the same size distribution, we confirmed that our divot N(Hg) matches the lack of D <100 km Neptune Torjan detections in the Sheppard & Trujillo (2010) surveys. Given our analysis, the conclusion would not be that small Neptune Trojans are -- 11 -- "missing", but rather that the sudden drop results in the population fainter than the divot not recovering in on-sky surface density until at least Hg > 11, by which point the deepest survey lacked the sensitivity to detect them. If correct, detection of several small (Hg > 11) Trojans requires surveying ∼ 100 square degrees to 26th magnitude at the correct elongation. 5.2. Hot Populations A recent deep telescopic survey (Fraser et al. 2010) estimated α ≃ 0.40 ± 0.15 (within error of our preferred αf = 0.5) from the apparent-magnitude distribution for "close" (30 < d < 38) TNOs (orbits were not obtained). These distances are dominated by several hot populations, but the measurement is shallower than the usual hot population slope of 0.8. We calculated Hg magnitudes for the Fraser et al. (2010) detections and find that due to the survey's depth, this sample is dominated by Hg > 9 TNOs and thus would measure the post-divot slope. 6. Feasibility of a Divot A primordial size-distribution wave at small sizes (D = 2 km) could propagate (Fraser 2009) to D ∼100 km in a dynamically hot (∆v = 2 km/s) collisional environment after 500 Myr. Alternately, recent modeling of planetesimal creation (Johansen et al. 2007; Morbidelli et al. 2009), suggests that the protosolar nebula may only have produced planetesimals larger than a certain critical diameter, in which case the αb = 0.8 slope and the D ∼ 100 km divot size are set by planetesimal formation physics; smaller objects appear only later due to collisional fragmentation. These scenarios match our results, where one interprets the hot population's N(Hg) to have been "frozen" when suddenly -- 12 -- transplanted (scattered) from a denser region nearer the Sun to the large volume it now occupies, ending the collisional evolution. An exciting prospect is that the divot directly records a preferential D that planet building produced in the solar-nebula region where the hot TNOs originally formed, and that the divot's depth (which could easily range from c=2 -- 30) measures the integrated collisional evolution (depending on both the duration of the pre-scattering phase and the random speeds present). An initial distribution with no D <100 km TNOs was shown (Campo Bagatin & Benavidez 2012) to evolve into a divot with c ∼ 20 and αf ≃ 0.5, in the dynamical environment of the Nice model; such a 500-Myr quiescent phase (Gomes et al. 2005) allows a divot to form but the evidence we find for a higher-i early phase may argue instead for a much shorter and more intense collisional environment. Our divoted N(Hg) produces a cumulative distribution (Fig. 2 B) with a shallow plateau for Hg=9 -- 12, similar to that deduced for the hot population and SOs in deep HST observations (Bernstein et al. 2004; Volk & Malhotra 2008) and estimated for scattering impactors of the saturnian moons (Minton et al. 2012). Our estimate of 2 × 106 SOs with Hg < 13 and a slope of αf = 0.5 extrapolates to ∼ 2 × 109 SOs with Hg <18, providing a sufficient number (Duncan & Levison 1997; Volk & Malhotra 2008) of SOs to feed the Jupiter Family Comets, while satisfying the observed plateau. Single power-laws that fit the Hg < 9 SOs fail when extended to smaller objects. Our novel divot parameterisation (Fig. 2) matches our data and would simultaneously explain the puzzles of the JFC source, the "missing" Neptune Trojans, and the known rollover in the Kuiper Belt's luminosity function. To better constrain the form of the break, a new survey must find and determine orbits for ∼10 SOs from 10 -- 30 AU; this requires discovery (and tracking over several degrees of arc) targets moving up to 15"/hr by observing ∼200 sq. deg. to 24th magnitude. -- 13 -- Facilities: CFHT, NRC (HIA) -- 14 -- REFERENCES Bernstein, G.M. et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1364 Brasser, R. & Morbidelli, A. 2012 Asteroids, Comets, and Meteors meeting, abstract. Batygin, K., Brown, M. & Fraser, W. 2011, ApJ, 13, 738 Campo Bagatin & A.,Benavidez, P. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 1254 Duncan, M. & Levison, H.F. 1997, Science, 276, 1670 Elliot, J., Kern, S.D. & Clancy, K.B. 2005, AJ, 129, 1117 Fraser, W. 2009, ApJ, 706, 119 Fraser, W., Brown, M. & Schwamb, M. 2010, Icarus, 210, 944 Fraser, W. & Kavelaars J.J. 2008, Icarus, 198, 452 Fraser, W. & Kavelaars, J.J. 2009, AJ, 137, 72 Fuentes C., & Holman, M. 2008, AJ, 136, 83 Fuentes, C., Holman, M., Trilling, D. & Protopapas, P. 2010, ApJ, 722, 1290 Gladman, B. et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 1051 Gladman, B. & Chan, C. 2006, ApJ, 643, L135 Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J.J., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, L91 Gladman, B., Lawler, S., Petit, J.-M, et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 23 Gladman, B., Marsden, B.G. & Vanlaerhoven, C. 2008, in The Solar System Beyond Neptune 43 -- 15 -- Gomes, R., Levison,H.F., Tsiganis & K., Morbidelli, A. 2005, Nature, 435, 466 Jewitt, D., Luu, J., & Trujillo, C. 1988, AJ115, 2125 Johansen, A., Oishi, J., Mac Low, M.-M., et al. 2007, Nature, 448, 1022 Jones, R.L., Gladman, B., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2006, Icarus, 185, 508 Kaib, N., Quinn, T. & Brasser, R. 2011, ApJ, 141, 3 Kaib, N., Roskar, R. & Quinn, T. 2011, Icarus, 215, 491 Kavelaars, J.J., Jones, R.L, Gladman, B., et al. 2009, AJ, 137, 491 Levison, H.F., Dones, L. & Duncan, M. 2001, AJ, 121, 2253 Levison, H., Morbidelli, A., Van Laerhoven, C., Gomes, R. & Tsiganis, K. 2008, Icarus, 196, 258 Luu, J., Marsden, B., Jewitt, D., et al. 1997, Nature, 387, 573 Minton, D., Richardson, J., Thomas, P., Kirchoff, M. & Schwamb, M. 2012, in ACM Conf. Sess 551 Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W.F., Nesvorn´y, D. & Levison, H. 2009, Icarus, 204, 448 Morbidelli, A., Emel'yanenko, V. & Levison, H.F. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 935 O'Brien, D. & Greenberg, R. 2005, Icarus, 178, 179 Petit, J.-M, Kavelaars, J.J., Gladman, B., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 131 Sheppard, S. & Trujillo, C. 2006, Science, 313, 511 Sheppard, S. & Trujillo, C. 2010, ApJ, 723, L233 -- 16 -- Solontoi, M., Ivezi´c, Z., Juri´c, M. et al. 2012, Icarus, 218, 571 Volk, K. & Malhotra, R. 2008, ApJ, 687, 714 Trujillo, C., Jewitt, D., & Luu, J. 2000, ApJ, 529, 103 This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. -- 17 -- A 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Semimajor axis a(AU) D B E 10 20 30 Inclination i( ◦ ) C F 40 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 q a 15 20 25 30 Zoom-in a,q(AU) 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Perhelion q(AU) 20 25 30 35 40 45 Detection distance d(AU) 7 8 9 10 11 Absolute H-magnitude Hg n o i t c a r f e v i t a u m u c l n o i t c a r f e v i t a u m u c l 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Fig. 1. -- Cumulative distributions for 5 quantities, comparing the observed objects (red staircase) with the initially cold model's simulated detections. The black dash-dot curves show the orbital model's intrinsic a, i, q, and d distributions. When coupled to two different N(Hg) distributions, the biases produce the differing predictions for the detections. A single power-law slope of α = 0.8 (blue dashed) is rejectable at > 99% confidence in d, q and Hg. Contrastingly, our preferred divot N(Hg) (green curve, see Fig. 2) provides vastly better matches, although both produce too many low-i detections. -- 18 -- Fig. 2. -- Histograms of the N(Hg) distribution for our preferred divot solution. The vertical axes show the total SO numbers using the absolute CFEPS calibration (Petit et al. 2011). A: The differential distribution (solid green), with an extrapolated α = 0.8 beyond Hg = 9 (dashed blue). The contrast c ≃ 6 is the ratio of differential number on either side of the divot. B: The cumulative version. For Hg >13 the cumulative N(< Hg) has reached slope αf after the flattened region following the divot. -- 19 -- AD = 77.1 io ≃12 ◦ AD = 0.28 io ≃1 ◦ 10 20 30 40 orbital inclination i (degrees) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 i < n o i t c a r f e v i t a u m u c l Fig. 3. -- The hot (black dashed) and cold (light blue dashed) KRQ11 intrinsic i distributions produce the biased distributions (solid lines) from our preferred model for comparison with the CFEPS sample (red). The hot model significantly improves the match because it has a relative lack (at the current epoch) of low-i SOs to be detected by the survey; the eleven CFEPS SOs have < 1% probability of being drawn from the initially cold simulation. -- 20 -- 50 35 30 25 15 l e v e L y t i l i b a t p e c c A 5 1 10.0 contrast c 100.0 αf 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.4 1.0 Fig. 4. -- Contour values (colours) computed from a grid (points) in (c, αf ) space, giving the Anderson-Darling probability of drawing the most rejectable of the d, q, i, and Hg distributions from the hot KRQ model of today's SOs. White areas indicate when the (c,αf ) pair had <1% probability of coming from the model, and the black contour bounds <5%. A single power-law (blue, darker star) is rejected. Our favoured model (green, lighter star) satisfies both (a) αf ≃ 0.5 like known JFCs, (b) α ≤ 0.6 which prevents the extrapolated mass of small SOs from diverging. -- 21 -- Designation a (AU) q (AU) i (deg) d (AU) Hg L4k09 HL8a1 L4m01 L4p07 L3q01 L7a03 L4v11 L4v04 L4v15 L3h08 HL7j2 30.19 32.38 33.48 39.95 50.99 59.61 60.04 64.10 68.68 159.6 24.60 13.586 26.63 22.33 42.827 44.52 28.73 8.205 31.36 26.31 23.545 29.59 33.41 22.26 6.922 4.575 38.17 46.99 9.5 7.3 8.9 7.7 8.1 7.1 31.64 11.972 26.76 10.0 38.10 13.642 31.85 36.81 14.033 22.95 20.26 15.499 38.45 9.1 9.0 8.0 8.4 133.25 20.67 34.195 37.38 Table 1: CFEPS + extension SO sample
1301.2741	2	1301	2013-01-15T07:45:37	The HARPS search for southern extrasolar planets: XXXIII. New multi-planet systems in the HARPS volume limited sample: a super-Earth and a Neptune in the habitable zone	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The vast diversity of planetary systems detected to date is defying our capability of understanding their formation and evolution. Well-defined volume-limited surveys are the best tool at our disposal to tackle the problem, via the acquisition of robust statistics of the orbital elements. We are using the HARPS spectrograph to conduct our survey of ~850 nearby solar-type stars, and in the course of the past nine years we have monitored the radial velocity of HD103774, HD109271, and BD-061339. In this work we present the detection of five planets orbiting these stars, with m*sin(i) between 0.6 and 7 Neptune masses, four of which are in two multiple systems, comprising one super-Earth and one planet within the habitable zone of a late-type dwarf. Although for strategic reasons we chose efficiency over precision in this survey, we have the capability to detect planets down to the Neptune and super-Earth mass range, as well as multiple systems, provided that enough data points are made available.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. finalarx August 15, 2018 c(cid:13) ESO 2018 3 1 0 2 n a J 5 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 1 4 7 2 . 1 0 3 1 : v i X r a The HARPS search for southern extrasolar planets (cid:63) XXXIII. New multi-planet systems in the HARPS volume limited sample: a super-Earth and a Neptune in the habitable zone. (cid:63)(cid:63) G. Lo Curto1, M. Mayor2, W. Benz3, F. Bouchy2,5, G. H´ebrard5,6, C. Lovis2, C. Moutou4, D. Naef2, F. Pepe2, D. Queloz2, N.C. Santos7,8, D. Segransan2, and S. Udry2 1 ESO - European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, 85748 Garching bei Munchen, Germany 2 Observatoire de Gen`eve, Universit´e de Gen`eve, 51 ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland 3 Physikalisches Institut Universitat Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland 4 Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, Traverse du Siphon, 13376 Marseille 12, France 5 Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, UMR7095 CNRS, Universit´e Pierre & Marie Curie, 98bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France 6 Observatoire de Haute-Provence, CNRS/OAMP, 04870 Saint-Michel-l'Observatoire, France 7 Centro de Astrofisica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal 8 Departamento de F´ısica e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciencias, Universidade do Porto, Portugal ABSTRACT The vast diversity of planetary systems detected to date is defying our capability of understanding their formation and evolution. Well-defined volume-limited surveys are the best tool at our disposal to tackle the problem, via the acquisition of robust statistics of the orbital elements. We are using the HARPS spectrograph to conduct our survey of ≈ 850 nearby solar-type stars, and in the course of the past nine years we have monitored the radial velocity of HD103774, HD109271, and BD-061339. In this work we present the detection of five planets orbiting these stars, with m sin(i) between 0.6 and 7 Neptune masses, four of which are in two multiple systems, comprising one super-Earth and one planet within the habitable zone of a late-type dwarf. Although for strategic reasons we chose efficiency over precision in this survey, we have the capability to detect planets down to the Neptune and super-Earth mass range, as well as multiple systems, provided that enough data points are made available. Key words. extra-solar planets -- multiple planetary systems -- radial velocity -- HD103774 -- HD109271 -- BD-061339 1. Introduction After more than 15 years of exo-planets detections (Mayor 1995, Schneider 2012), we have witnessed an extreme diversity of planetary systems, but we have not yet detected a system that could be considered a twin to our own solar system, not even limited to the giant (and easier to detect) planets. We are left with the question of whether our system, and with it our planet, are the norm, or rather the exception in planet formation and evo- lution. To date, only about one third of the detected planets are found in confirmed multi-planet systems (Schneider 2012). This fraction is steadily rising with the increasing amount of available high-quality data, indicating that we are fighting against a detec- tion bias. Multi-planet systems are more challenging to detect because they require many data points to permit the identifica- tion of the individual signals and because, as is revealed from the data collected so far, often they involve low-mass planets in the super-Earth to Neptune mass range (e.g. Lo Curto 2010, H´ebrard 2010, Lovis 2011, Fischer 2012). The combination of the low amplitude of these signals with the more complex mo- Send offprint requests to: G. Lo Curto e-mail: [email protected] (cid:63) Based on observations made with the HARPS instrument on the ESO 3.6 m telescope at La Silla (Chile), under the GTO program ID 072.C-0488 and the regular programs: 085.C-0019, 087.C-0831 and 089.C-0732. (cid:63)(cid:63) RV data are only available in electronic form at the CDS tion induced on the parent star by the systems requires a substan- tial observational effort both in terms of observing time and of the measurement precision. time at Our survey is using the HARPS spectrograph, which is mounted full the 3.6m ESO telescope in La Silla and is optimized for precise radial velocity measurements (Mayor 2003). To date, it has discovered more than 150 exo- planets, most of them (through the high-precision program) with masses in the super-Earth range; this definitely changed our view on the field. Since the start of HARPS operations we are monitoring about 850 stars with moderate radial velocity precision (≈ 2 − 3ms−1), searching for Jupiter and Neptune planets orbiting solar- type stars (Lo Curto 2010), while the HARPS high-precision program (Mayor 2003), which routinely achieves precision bet- ter than 1ms−1, targets lower mass planets, mostly in the super- Earth mass regime. The goals of our program are the acquisi- tion of accurate orbital elements of Jupiter and Neptune-mass planets in the solar neighborhood (within 57.5pc) and the search for Jupiter twins, which might reveal solar system twins. Of the 43 planets discovered so far by this program, 17 have periods longer than 1000 days (Moutou 2009, Naef 2010, two more are presented in a paper in preparation), but their eccentricities are significantly higher than that of Jupiter. The program has de- tected three systems with two planets and one triple planetary system so far (H´ebrard 2010, Lo Curto 2010). Out of the nine planets in multiple systems we have discovered so far, only two 1 G. Lo Curto et al.: The HARPS search for southern extrasolar planets have masses larger than or equal to Jupiter, which is consistent with the observed trend of low-mass planets being detected pri- marily in multiple systems. In this paper we report three stars with multiple Keplerian- like signals. In section 2 we discuss the stars' properties, and in section 3 the orbital solutions. In section 4 we briefly discuss the encountered systems. 2. The stars The three stars belong to our volume-limited sample and were selected to be low-activity, non-rotating, solar-type stars on the main sequence (Lo Curto 2010). We have used the magnitude estimates by Hog (2000), and the one by Koen (2011) for the redder star BD-061339. They originate from the Tycho and HIPPARCOS catalogs, respectively (ESA-1997, Van Leeuwen 2007). The color indices and the parallaxes are from Van Leeuwen 2007, and the bolometric corrections are ex- tracted from a calibration to the data presented by Flower (1996), with uncertainties generally below 0.1 mag. 2.1. HD103774 The star HD103774 is a young, metal-rich, main-sequence star with spectral type F5V (Pickles 2010, Sousa 2011). Its average activity level is low, but it varied considerably during the time span of our observations (see figure 4), going from a more "ac- tive" state with log(RHK) = −4.72 to a more "quiet" state with log(RHK) = −5.00 (see Noyes 1984 for a definition of the ac- tivity indicator). We therefore expect to measure some level of radial velocity jitter. Using the online data service VizieR, we found measure- ments of this star in the mid- and far-infrared, from the IRC (in- strument onboard the AKARI satellite, Ishihara 2010) and IRAS (Moshir 1990) catalogs (see figure 1). The data points at 25, 60, and 100 µm are upper limits. The solid line in figure 1 reproduces the black body corresponding to the star's photospheric tempera- ture of 6489K. The uncertainty on the temperature (77K) would not be noticed on the scale of this graph. The point at 12µm is deviating from the black body and might seem to indicate an infrared excess. Circum-stellar dust is indeed quite common around early-type young stars. While the evidence for infrared excess at 12 µm is only marginal (1 sigma) and calls for more precise measurements, no excess is measured up to 9 µm, giv- ing an indication on the minimum size of the grains that could possibly be present in the disk. 2.2. HD109271 This old and quiet G5V star does not show infrared excess (Ishihara 2010, IRAS data are not available), and has a near- solar metallicity (Sousa 2011). Its basic parameters, as for the other stars, are shown in table 1. 2.3. BD-061339 BD-061339 is a late-type dwarf (spectral type K7V/M0V), with no obvious infrared excess (Moshir 1990, IRAS Faint Source Reject Catalog, Version 2.0). The estimation of the metallicity in late-type dwarfs is com- plicated by the abundance of molecular bands of various metal oxides in the spectra (e.g. TiO, VO). Neves et al. (2012) have discussed various calibrations present in the literature and pre- 2 Fig. 1. Spectral flux density for HD103774 measured in Jy. The solid line is a black body with the temperature of the star: 6489K. The arrows indicate that the three data points are only upper lim- its. sented an improved photometric calibration for the metallicity. We adopted their prescription to estimate the metallicity of BD- 061339, and used the dispersion around their calibration as an estimate of the uncertainty. This value is well above the mea- surement uncertainty computed via error propagation from their formula, and is limited by the quality of the calibration. index log R(cid:48) in table 1. Owing to the red color of the star the estimate of the activity HK is considered unreliable and no value is included 3. Orbital solutions We studied the radial velocity (RV) variation of our target stars via the analysis of the periodograms of the RV data following the generalized Lomb-Scargle periodogram method outlined by Zechmeister and Kuerster (2009) and via the use of genetic al- gorithm as described in the work by Segransan et al. (2011). In all cases we verified whether the RV was correlated with the bi- sector span of the cross correlation function (CCF), the activity indicator RHK (Noyes 1984), and the FHWM of the CCF be- fore claiming a companion. In addition to this, we also studied the periodogram of these indicators. When attempting a fit with more degrees of freedom (e.g., using a model with more planets or adding a long-term drift to the model), we verified with an F-test that the new fit brings a significant improvement over the fit with fewer degrees of freedom. We ran an F-test and obtained a false-alarm probability (FAP) for which we used a threshold of 10−4 to identify significant peaks. The orbital elements are finally displayed in table 2. 3.1. HD103774 We acquired 103 radial velocity measurements for this star in about 7.5 years. The average uncertainty is ≈ 2.6ms−1, while the standard deviation of the radial velocity over the entire data set is ≈ 26ms−1, a clear indication of variability. The periodogram of the radial velocities (Fig. 2) indicates an excess of power at ≈ 5.9 days, while no other significant peak is visible. The one-year and the two-year aliases (at 5.79d and 5.84d) are also present in the periodogram, but at half the power of the main signal. In figure 3 we show the Keplerian fit as a function of phase together with the data. The orbit is evident, although noisy. structures ("bumps" at ≈ 11d, 13d, 15d, 470d, 740d), they are not signifi- Although the periodogram shows various G. Lo Curto et al.: The HARPS search for southern extrasolar planets Table 1. Observed and inferred stellar parameters of the three stars of this study. π: parallax, d: distance, MV: absolute magnitude in V, Bol. corr.: bolometric correction, L: luminosity, Te f f : effective stellar temperature, M∗: stellar mass, log g : gravity at the star's surface, vsin i: projected rotational velocity of the star, log R(cid:48) HK): star's rotation period estimated via the activity indicator. HK : activity indicator (Noyes 1984), Prot(log R(cid:48) Parameter Hipparcos name HIP Spectral type V B − V π d MV Bol. Corr. L Teff [Fe/H] M∗ log g age vsin i log R(cid:48) Prot(log R(cid:48) [mag] [mag] [mas] [pc] [mag] [mag] [L(cid:12)] [K] [dex] [M(cid:12)] [cgs] [Gyr] [km s−1] [days] HK HK) HD 103774 58263 F5V 7.12 ± 0.01 0.503 ± 0.014 18.03±0.52 55±2 3.40 ± 0.06 -0.013 3.5 ± 0.3 6489 ± 77 0.28 ± 0.06 1.335±0.03 4.26 ±0.13 1.05 ± 0.64 8.1 -4.85 ± 0.07 7 HD 109271 61300 G5V 8.05 ± 0.01 0.658±0.002 16.21±0.75 62±3 4.1 ± 0.1 -0.097 2.0 ± 0.3 5783 ± 62 0.10 ± 0.05 1.047± 0.024 4.28 ± 0.10 7.3 ± 1.2 2.7 -4.99 ± 0.08 24 BD-061339 27803 K7V / M0V 9.69 ± 0.01 1.321 ± 0.001 49.23±1.65 20±1 8.15 ± 0.07 -0.782 0.095 ± 0.01 4324 ± 100 -0.14±0.17 0.7 4.74 ± 0.02 4.4 ± 4.0 0.57 - - (Hog 2000, Koen 2010) (Van Leeuwen 2007) (Van Leeuwen 2007) (Flower 1996) (Sousa 2011, Ammons 2006) (Sousa 2011, Neves 2012) (Girardi 2000) (Girardi 2000, Sousa 2011) (Girardi 2000) (Glebocki 2005, CORAVEL) (Noyes 1984) Fig. 2. Periodogram of the RV data for HD103774. A significant peak is visible at ≈ 5.9 days. The topmost dashed line is the 10−4 false-alarm probability, the lower dotted lines correspond to 10−3, 10−2, and 10−1 false-alarm probabilities. Fig. 3. Keplerian fit of the radial velocity data of HD103774 as a function of orbital phase. cant, and we see no correlation of the radial velocities with the activity indicators S MW (Baliunas 1995) or log(RHK) (Pearson coefficient < 0.1), nor with the bisectors or the FWHM. The time series of the activity index log(RHK) shows strong vari- ations of the index with time (Fig. 4), indicating that the star activity level might increase considerably. Fig. 4. Variation of the radial velocity (upper panel) and the ac- tivity index (lower panel) of HD103774 with time. Because we have enough data points, we separately analyzed three groups of RV data in three disjoint Julian date bins. From orbital fitting we have obtained the same periods for the three groups of data within the experimental uncertainty of ≈ 10−3 days. The same is true for the phase of the orbit, although in this case the uncertainties are larger (≈ 2 days). Therefore the detected period is constant within the time span of the measure- ment, i.e., 7.5 years. The period of ≈ 5.9 days is quite close to the estimated ro- tation period of the star (Noyes 1984) of ≈ 7 days. However, the lack of periodicity of the bisector span, together with the lack of correlation between bisector and radial velocity, and the fact that the orbital period is strictly constant along the 7.5 years of data gives us confidence that the most likely cause of the radial velocity variation with the period of ≈ 5.9 days is a low-mass companion. When looking at the residuals we still notice a significant scatter of the data. Moreover, the periodogram of the resid- uals shows an excess of power corresponding to a period of ≈ 750 days, jointly with its one-year alias at ≈ 250 days. We significantly improved the overall fit to the data by fitting two 3 10.0100.01000.2.20.200.2000.5.50.500.5000. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Period [days]Normalized power . . . .−0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.1−60−40−20 0 20 40HD103774harpsmeanfRV [m/s] . . . .G. Lo Curto et al.: The HARPS search for southern extrasolar planets Fig. 5. Activity index log(RHK) of HD103774 as a function of the residuals from the single-Keplerian fit. A strong correlation is evident. The value of the Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.6. Keplerians. However, we detected a strong correlation between the radial velocity residuals to the single-Keplerian fit and the activity index log(RHK) (Fig. 5) with the value of the Pearson correlation coefficient which is equal to 0.6, and found a peak in the periodogram of the activity index corresponding to this pe- riod. For these reasons we attribute the variation of the residuals to the one-Keplerian fit to stellar magnetic cycles (Santos 2010). The highly varying log(RHK) reaches values as high as −4.7, lending further support to the suggestion that the activity of this early-type, relatively young star could be responsible for the large χ2 and the scatter of the residuals around the one-planet fit. 3.2. HD109271 We measured the radial velocity of the star HD109271 95 times in 7.5 years. The RV varies by 6ms−1 RMS, well in excess of the average RV error, which is below 1ms−1. The periodogram of the observed data is shown in the top panel of figure 6, and two peaks are clearly visible, one of which is above the 10−4 FAP level. We fit a Keplerian to this signal and obtained a good fit for a period of ≈ 7.85 days. After fitting the first period, looking at the periodogram of the residuals (figure 6, middle panel) we notice a second peak, corresponding to the second-highest peak in the periodogram of the observations, above our FAP limit. This signal corresponds to a variation with a period of ≈ 30.98 days. The phased radial velocity curves of the two planets result- ing from a two-Keplerians (simultaneous) fit and after subtrac- tion of the RV signal of the other planet are shown in figure 7. Neither of the signals is correlated with the bisector, with the activity index, or the FWHM of the CCF; we also verified that the periodograms of these parameters have no power at periods corresponding to the identified orbital periods. Moreover, both signals were identified using the entire data set and also using three disjoint subgroups of the entire data set, indicating that they are present during the whole time span of our observations. Therefore we consider the origin of the two signals to be two low-mass companions orbiting the star HD109271. After the two-planets fit to the HD109271 RV data, the pe- riodogram of the residuals shows two signals above our FAP threshold at P≈ 198d and P≈ 430d (figure 6, bottom panel). Within the uncertainties, these periods are the one year alias 4 Fig. 6. Periodograms of HD109271. From top to bottom: peri- odogram of the data, the residuals after the one-planet fit, and the residuals after the two-planets fit. The dashed line marks the 10−4 FAP, the dotted lines, from top to bottom, the 10−3, 10−2, and 10−1 FAP. of each other. When constraining the analysis to consider time spans shorter than one year but longer than 200 days, both peaks disappear, and they reappear together only when the time span is longer than ≈ 600 days, an indication that the signal could be the peak at ≈ 430 days, and the one at ≈ 198 days could be the alias. The third signal, which could be associated to a 1.3 Neptune-mass planet on a 1 AU eccentric (e≈ 0.36) or- bit, is very noisy and at the limit of detectability by our survey (K1 < 2ms−1, < δRV >≈ 1ms−1). Although we cannot asso- ciate this signal to stellar activity, we need a larger data set and a higher precision to eventually confirm it as a companion to HD109271. 3.3. BD-061339 We collected 102 radial velocity measurements of the star BD- 061339 in about eight years . The average RV uncertainty is 2.7 ms−1. Figure 8 shows the periodogram of the observations, clearly indicating an excess of power at ≈ 125 days, well above the 10−4 FAP level. A Keplerian fit to the data allowed us to reconstruct an or- bit whose RV variation as function of the orbital phase is shown in Figure 9. The orbital fit is very robust, no correlation is seen between the radial velocities and the activity index, the bisector span or the FWHM of the CCF, and subsamples of the data se- lected in Julian date show a periodic RV variation with the same period within the uncertainties. -5.00 -4.95 -4.90 -4.85 -4.80 -4.75 -4.70 -40.0 -30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0log10(RHK)Residuals from single keplerian fit (m/s)!!10.0100.01000.2.20.200.2000.5.50.500.5000. 0 5 10 15 20 25Period [days]Normalized power . . . .10.0100.01000.2.20.200.2000.5.50.500.5000. 0 5 10 15 20Period [days]Normalized power . . . .10.0100.01000.2.20.200.2000.5.50.500.5000. 0 2 4 6 8 10Period [days]Normalized power . . . .G. Lo Curto et al.: The HARPS search for southern extrasolar planets Fig. 10. Periodogram of the residuals to the first Keplerian fit to the of BD-061339 RV data. A signal at P≈ 3.9 days is visible just above the 10−4 FAP level. Fig. 7. Radial velocity curves of planets HD109271b (top panel) and HD109271c (bottom panel) as a function of phase. Fig. 8. Periodogram of the observations of BD-061339. The pe- riod at ≈ 125 days is clearly visible well above the 10−4 FAP level. Fig. 9. Orbital fit of the 125-day signal to the BD-061339 RV data. days with the signal just above the 10−4 FAP level. The periodogram of the residuals shows an excess at P≈ 3.9 The peak in the periodogram at ≈ 3.9 days is well defined, and the fit with a two-planets model converges and significantly improves the χ2. The F-test gives a 99% probability of improve- ment of a two-Keplerian simultaneous fit over a one-Keplerian. The uncertainty on the period from the fit is less than 10−3 Fig. 11. Evolution in time of the integrated flux in the Ca II H line of BD-061339. The star appears much less active during the last observation campaigns. The red points (darker) represent the amplitude of the Ca II H re-emission normalized at 6540Å, while the green points (lighter) represent the S MW index. The latter one is heavily affected by the low S/N in the blue side of the spectrum. days due to the many periods covered through the entire ob- servations campaign. Because of the quite red color of the star (B − V = 1.321), the activity indicator log(RHK) is not reliable. In an attempt to study the activity of this evolved star, we ob- served the evolution of the re-emission in the Ca II H and K lines with time. To quantify the re-emission we normalized the spec- tra to the continuum. As suggested by Mould (1976), the region around 6540Å is only weakly affected by TiO bands. By direct inspection we verified that the contribution of the TiO bands at this wavelength for this star is indeed negligible, and that the width of the Hα line is such that it does not affect the region we planned to use to estimate the continuum. The normalized inte- grated flux of the Ca II H line as function of time is shown in figure 11. It drops by a factor ≈ 2 between JD 2454000 and JD 2456000. In figure 11 we also show the time dependence of the S MW index: this index drops as well as a function of time, al- though the slope is significantly smaller. The S MW index is nor- malized to the continuum much closer to the re-emission line, but the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) is very low in this region, and the substantial photon noise strongly influences the measure- ment. For this reason we attempted the normalization at 6540Å. The star is becoming less active in recent times. Figure 12 shows the re-emission in the Ca II H line in April 2007 (JD = 2454200) and September 2012 (JD = 2456200). The intensity of the line almost halved during this period. 5 !!−0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.1−5 0 5HD109271harpsmeanφRV [m/s] . . . .−0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.1−5 0 5HD109271harpsmeanφRV [m/s] . . . .10.0100.01000.2.20.200.2000.5.50.500.5000. 0 5 10 15Period [days]Normalized power . . . .−0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.1−10−5 0 5 10BD−061339harpsmeanfRV [m/s] . . . .10.0100.01000.2.20.200.2000.5.50.500.5000. 0 5 10 15Period [days]Normalized power . . . .G. Lo Curto et al.: The HARPS search for southern extrasolar planets Fig. 12. Ca II H re-emission from two spectra of BD-061339 acquired in April 2007 and September 2012. The intensity of the line of the more recent spectrum is reduced almost by half. Fig. 14. Mass-period distribution of the RV-detected planets. The crosses represent all detected planets, the filled triangles the planets from this program, the asterisks the solar system plan- ets, and the filled circles the planets presented in this work. activity, at other times detection of planets around these stars may become possible. Fig. 13. Radial velocity as function of the orbital phase of the short-period planet of the star BD-061339. Because of the variation of the activity level of the star with time, we divided our data set into two subsamples: one contain- ing data acquired before JD = 2454500 and the other being its complement. These subsamples contain about the same number of measurements, therefore our ability to identify the periodic variation induced by the potential second planet should be the same in both of them (the sampling is roughly similar). The nor- malized power at the peak in the periodogram goes from 3.9 (arbitrary units) for observations taken before JD=2454500 to 10.1 for observations taken after this date, the power increases for each new added data point. The period stays constant within one sigma in the two datasets. It is worth underlining that the uncertainty on the period is small also for the two separate sub- samples: less than 10−2 days. Adding the fact that we see no correlation between the RV residuals to the one-planet fit and the FWHM of the CCF or the bisector span, nor do we see significant power in the peri- odogram of these parameters around the ≈ 3.9 days period, we gain confidence that the second signal, which is becoming more evident as the star becomes less active, is indeed a planet. The RV as a function of the orbital phase is shown in figure 13. This case is nice and instructive, and clearly shows how a planetary signal emerges from the noise of an active star when the activity level drops. It also reminds us that "active" stars are not necessarily always active, and that if at some time they are inappropriate for a planet search because of their high level of 6 4. Discussion We have identified five planetary signals with m sin(i) going from 0.6 to 7 times the mass of Neptune. Assuming they lie in the same region of the radius-mass space as the confirmed transiting planets (Schneider 2012), we can estimate their radius and there- fore their density. With this assumption, we obtain a maximum density for these newly discovered planets that is comparable to Neptune's or Jupiter's mean density, making them most likely gaseous planets. Observing the current detections in the mass-period diagram (figure 14), we see that the planets presented in this paper are close to the detection limit of our survey, of about ≈ 3ms−1, and that two of them fall in the low-populated region of intermediate periods, between ≈ 10 and ≈ 200 days. This region is indeed mostly occupied by planets detected in multiple planetary sys- tems. It makes us wonder whether the presence of more than one planet breaks a certain symmetry that then allows the planet to occupy a range of otherwise "forbidden" orbital periods. The periods of the two Neptune-mass planets orbiting the star HD109271 are near a 1:4 resonance, but this would require a thorough dynamical analysis to be confirmed. The planetary system orbiting the star HD109271 is very similar to the HD69830 system (Lovis 2006): the periods of the planets b and c differ only by 10% and 2% respectively, while the planet masses differ by less than a factor of two, which is an indication that there seem to be some "preferred architectures" among planetary systems. Whether this is real or an effect of our limited understanding of the reality is an open question. The outer planet of the system orbiting the star BD-061339 is particularly interesting because it falls right in the middle of the habitable zone (HZ) of its star. Following the method out- lined by Kane (2012), we estimate the habitable zone of the star to extend from 0.5 to 0.9 AU. The orbit of planet c, even consid- ering its relatively high eccentricity of 0.31, lies entirely within −0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.1−10−5 0 5 10 15BD−061339harpsmeanfRV [m/s] . . . . 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1 10 100 1000 10000Period (days)M2 sin (i) (MEarth)Time span limit (9 years)1m/s limit3m/s limit10m/s limit All discovered exoplanets Solar system planets HARPS planets from this program HARPS planets from this workG. Lo Curto et al.: The HARPS search for southern extrasolar planets Table 2. Orbital parameters for the planets. P: period, T: time at periastron passage, e: eccentricity, ω: argument of periastron, K: semi-amplitude of the radial velocity curve, m sin i : projected planetary mass, a: semi-major orbital axis, V: average radial velocity, Nmeas: number of measurements, < δ RV>: average uncertainty on the radial velocity measurements, σ (O-C) : root mean square of the residuals from the Keplerian fit. Parameter P T e ω K m sin i m sin i a V Nmeas Time span < δ RV> σ (O-C) χ2 red [days] [JD-2400000] [deg] [m s−1] [MJup] [MEarth] [AU] [km s−1] [days] [ms−1] [ms−1] HD 103774b 5.8881 ± 0.0005 55675.4 ± 2.0 0.09 ± 0.04 -42±64 34.3 ± 1.8 0.367 ± 0.022 116 ± 7 0.070 ± 0.001 -3.049±0.003 102 2734 2.6 11.43 15.7 ± 0.6 HD 109271b 7.8543 ± 0.0009 55719.1 ± 3.6 0.25 ± 0.08 -64±20 5.6 ± 0.5 0.054 ± 0.004 17 ± 1 0.079 ± 0.001 -4.903±0.001 87 2683 0.9 2.05 4.6 ± 0.3 HD 109271c 30.93 ± 0.02 55733 ±8 0.15 ±0.09 4± 120 4.9 ± 0.4 0.076 ± 0.007 24 ± 2 0.196 ± 0.003 -4.903± 0.001 87 2683 0.9 2.05 4.6 ± 0.3 BD−061339b 3.8728 ± 0.0004 55220.50 ± 0.10 0.0 (fixed) 0.0 (fixed) 4.4 ± 0.6 0.027 ± 0.004 8.5 ± 1.3 0.0428 ± 0.0007 23.625 ± 0.003 102 2955 2.7 4.3 2.47 ± 0.23 BD−061339c 125.94 ± 0.44 55265.2 ± 17.6 0.31 ± 0.11 41 ± 55 9.1 ±2.9 0.17 ± 0.03 53 ± 8 0.435±0.007 23.625 ± 0.003 102 2955 2.7 4.3 2.47 ± 0.23 the HZ. Depending on the albedo (in the range 0.4 - 0.9) and on the atmospheric model (efficient / inefficient heat transport) the surface temperature of the planet can be between 0 oC and 100 oC. Although suggestive, this is a simplistic approach however, because it does not take into account that the albedo as well as the stellar flux vary with wavelength. Moreover, due to its mass, the planet is likely to be a gas planet, making conditions for life probably more difficult. rence is generally low. Interestingly, most of the planets with periods in this range belong to multiple planetary systems. Owing to the small amplitude of the signals and to the prox- imity of their amplitudes, approximately 100 data points per sys- tem were necessary to achieve the current detections, which sup- ports ample time coverage and high-cadence monitoring as the key elements to access some of the most interesting planetary detections. 5. Conclusions We have presented new results from our nine-year low-precision (2 − 3ms−1) survey of a volume-limited sample of the solar neighborhood with HARPS. We detected five exo-planets orbit- ing three low-activity, slowly rotating solar-type stars. Four of the detected planets are in two multi-planet systems. The planets have m sin(i) ranging from 0.6 to 7 Neptune masses, the lightest being in the super-Earth mass range, underlining that our survey, albeit limited in precision because of a strategical choice, has the capability to detect Neptune-mass and in some cases even super- Earth planets. The star BD-061339 hosts two planets: in the case that sin(i) = 1, they would be a super-Earth, possibly in a tidally locked configuration due to its proximity to the host star, and a planet of ≈ three Neptune masses in the habitable zone. The case presented by this star is particularly instructive because it shows how one of the signals became more clear with time, as the stellar activity was diminishing. The star HD103774, hosting one planet with m sin(i) roughly the mass of Neptune, has also shown signs of varying activity during the nine years of our monitoring campaign. A reminder that the stellar activity changes with time, and stars that at one time are unsuitable for high-precision RV measurements, might become more quiet at another time and offer the possibility to acquire precise RV data. The star HD109271 hosts two planets with m sin(i) approxi- mately the mass of Neptune and with orbital periods and m sin(i) very similar to planets b and c around the star HD698430 (Lovis 2006). This fact suggests that some planetary architec- tures might be "preferred" in Nature. Two out of the five planets we detected have periods in the range between 10 and 200 days, a region where planet occur- Acknowledgements. We thank the staff of the La Silla Observatory at ESO in Chile for their passionate and professional support. This research has made use of the VizieR catalogue access tool, CDS, Strasbourg, France. The original description of the VizieR service was published in A&AS 143, 23. NCS support acknowledges European Research Council/European Community under the FP7 through Starting Grant agreement number 239953, as well as from Fundac¸ao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) through program Ciencia 2007 funded by FCT/MCTES (Portugal) and POPH/FSE (EC), and in the form of grants reference PTDC/CTE-AST/098528/2008 and PTDC/CTE-AST/098604/2008. the by the We thank the referee Martin Kurster for the helpful comments which con- tributed to improve this paper. References Ammons, S.M., et al., 2006, ApJ, 638, 1004A Baliunas, S.L. et al., 1995, ApJ, 438, 269 ESA, 1997, ESA-SP 1200 "The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO catalogue" Fischer, D. et al., 2012, ApJ, 745, 21 Flower, P.J., 1996, ApJ, 469, 355 Girardi, L. et al., 2000, A&AS, 141, 371 Glebocki R, et al., Vizier online data catalog, 2005, ESA SP-560, 571 H´ebrard, G. et al., 2010, A&AS, 512, A46 Hog, E. et al., 2000, A&A, 355, L27 Ishihara, D. et al., 2010, A&A, 514A, 1I Kane, S. et al., 2012, PASP, 124, 914 Koen, C. et al., 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1949K Lo Curto, G. et al., 2010, A&A, 512,A48 Lovis, C. et al., 2006, Nature, 441, 305 Lovis, C. et al., 2011, A&A, 528, A112 Mayor, M., Queloz, D., 1995, Nature, 378, 355 Mayor, M. et al., 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20 Moshir, M. et al., 1990, IRASF.C, 0M Mould, J. R., 1976, ApJ, 207, 535 Moutou, C. et al., 2009, A&A, 496,513 Naef, D. et al., 2007, A&A, 470,721 Naef, D. et al., 2010, A&A, 523, A15 Neves, V. et al., 2012, A&A, 538,A25 Noyes, R.W. et al., 1984, ApJ, 279, 763 7 G. Lo Curto et al.: The HARPS search for southern extrasolar planets Pickles, A., De Pagne, E., 2010, PASP, 122, 898, 1437 Santos, N.C. et al., 2010, A&A, 511, A54 Schneider, J., http://exoplanet.eu, 15 October 2012 Segransan, D. et al., 2011, A&A, 535, A54 Sousa, S. et al., 2011, A&A, 533A, 141S Van Leeuwen, F. et al., 2007,"Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction", 2007, A&A, 474, 653 Zechmeister, M., Kuerster, M., 2009, A&A, 496, 577Z 8
1602.03204	1	1602	2016-02-09T21:51:50	Identifying False Alarms in the Kepler Planet Candidate Catalog	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present a new automated method to identify instrumental features masquerading as small, long period planets in the \kepler\ planet candidate catalog. These systematics, mistakenly identified as planet transits, can have a strong impact on occurrence rate calculations because they cluster in a region of parameter space where Kepler's sensitivity to planets is poor. We compare individual transit-like events to a variety of models of real transits and systematic events, and use a Bayesian Information Criterion to evaluate the likelihood that each event is real. We describe our technique and test its performance on simulated data. Results from this technique are incorporated in the \kepler\ Q1-17 DR24 planet candidate catalog of \citet{Coughlin15}.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version February 11, 2016 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 6 1 0 2 b e F 9 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 4 0 2 3 0 . 2 0 6 1 : v i X r a IDENTIFYING FALSE ALARMS IN THE Kepler PLANET CANDIDATE CATALOG F. Mullally1, Jeffery L. Coughlin1, Susan E. Thompson1, Jessie Christiansen2, Christopher Burke1, Bruce D. Clarke1, Michael R. Haas3 Draft version February 11, 2016 ABSTRACT We present a new automated method to identify instrumental features masquerading as small, long period planets in the Kepler planet candidate catalog. These systematics, mistakenly identified as planet transits, can have a strong impact on occurrence rate calculations because they cluster in a region of parameter space where Kepler's sensitivity to planets is poor. We compare individual transit-like events to a variety of models of real transits and systematic events, and use a Bayesian Information Criterion to evaluate the likelihood that each event is real. We describe our technique and test its performance on simulated data. Results from this technique are incorporated in the Kepler Q1-17 DR24 planet candidate catalog of Coughlin et al. (2015). Subject headings: planetary systems, eclipses 1. INTRODUCTION their sample (see Figure 14 in Burke et al.). One of the major goals of the Kepler mission (Koch et al. 2010) is to estimate the frequency of Earth-size planets in the habitable zones of solar-type stars. To that end, the spacecraft collected 4 years of near-continuous data on ∼150,000 stars, searching for the faint signal of small transiting planets. The Q1-Q16 catalog of Kepler planet candidates (Mul- lally et al. 2015) reported 554 new candidate planets. They noted an excess of candidates at periods longer than 100 days over what would be expected if planets were evenly distributed in orbital period. They iden- tified two large populations of long-period false alarm Threshold Crossing Events (TCEs, or the statistically significant periodic events in a lightcurve that are vetted to produce the planet candidate catalog). One narrow peak centered around 372 days (the orbital period of the spacecraft), and a larger, broader peak spanning 200- 600 days (see their § 3.1). While their vetting process fil- tered out most of the false alarm events from the narrow peak (leaving no excess of candidates at this orbital pe- riod), they concluded the observed excess of long-period planet candidates was more likely due to incomplete fil- tering of the broader peak than any super abundance of small planets in this period range (see their § 9.1). Burke et al. (2015) computed the occurrence rates of planets as a function of radius and period around solar analogs using the catalog of Mullally et al. (2015). They found a sharp rise in the computed frequency of Earth analogs for periods longer than 300 days. They traced the excess to 5 planet candidates with radii < 1.2 R⊕ and periods of 450–550 days, a region of parameter space where such planets could only be detected around 1% of [email protected] 1 SETI/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 2 NASA Exoplanet Science Instititute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 3 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA It is clear that understanding the reliability of the Ke- pler catalog (the fraction of candidates actually due to transiting planets) is an important precondition to mea- suring terrestrial planet occurrence rates. Much work has been done identifying astrophysical false positives due to eclipsing binaries and stellar multiplicity scenarios (e.g. Torres et al. 2011; Morton 2012; Col´on et al. 2015; San- terne et al. 2012; Bryson et al. 2013; D´esert et al. 2015), but less on instrumental artifacts. The statistical val- idation techniques used on Kepler planets (e.g. Torres et al. 2011; Rowe et al. 2014) compare the probability that a transit was due to a planet to various eclipsing binary type scenarios. However, small, long period Ke- pler candidates have a non-negligible probability of being caused by an instrumental or processing artifact. Rowe et al. (2014) explicitly avoided low signal to noise cases for this reason. In this paper we report on a new method to identify and reject false alarm candidates at long periods. This method, which we dub Marshall4,5, fits the individual transit events for candidates with models of transits and commonly found artifacts, and evaluates which one is more probable based on a Bayesian Information Crite- rion. Based on simulations, we find that known artifact types are rejected ≈ 60–70% of the time, while transits are preserved at the 95%, level as discussed in § 3. Marshall is one component of the Kepler Robovetter, an automated process for vetting planet candidates in Kepler data, which includes the Flux Robovetter (Cough- lin et al. 2015), the Centroid Robovetter (F. Mullally 2015 in prep), the ephemeris matching of Coughlin et al. (2014), and the machine learning technique of (Thomp- son et al. 2015) that identifies short period variable stars mistakenly identified as planets. The Robovetter re- places the manual vetting approach of previous catalogs 4 After a character in the animated series Paw Patrol. 5 Never let a three year old name your algorithms. 2 Mullally et al. with an automatic, rules-based technique. In addition to removing some of the inevitable subjectivity of the man- ual process, the performance of the Robovetter can be tested against large numbers of simulated transits. Marshall can be easily applied to any transit search where short duration signals (such as instrumental ar- tifacts) are misidentified as transits. In any matched filter approach, such as Box Least Squares (Kov´acs et al. 2002), or the TPS algorithm used by the Ke- pler pipeline (Seader et al. 2015), non-transit signals will be occasionally mistaken for transits. If the false alarm signals can be modeled, the Marshall approach can be used separate true transits from the false alarms. The Marshall algorithm will be useful analyzing data from the upcoming TESS and PLATO missions. We make a reference implementation in Python available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/marshall. 2. METHOD The key insight of our technique is that long period candidates have few enough events that there is sufficient signal-to-noise in an individual event to discriminate be- tween valid and invalid transit shapes. By looking at individual events we have access to information about the transit shape that can be lost in the folded transit event. For each Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) in the Q1- Q17 DR24 catalog (Coughlin et al. 2015) we extract a snippet of data 1.5 times the reported transit duration ei- ther side of the midpoint of each individual transit event (i.e. once per orbital period of the candidate planet). We use the transit parameters (orbital period, epoch, tran- sit duration) from Seader et al. (2015). We obtain the publicly available lightcurves from MAST6 and use the co-trended lightcurve which corrects for many instrumen- tal features (available in the PDCSAP FLUX column of the lightcurve file; see Fraquelli & Thompson 2014 and Smith et al. 2012). We then fit each event with the following set of models: 1. A parabola. 2. A parabola with a negative-going step-wise discon- tinuity (i.e. a step down) at the reported time of ingress. 3. A parabola with a positive-going step-wise discon- tinuity at the reported time of egress. 4. A parabola plus a Sudden Pixel Sensitivity Dropout event (SPSD; an SPSD is typically caused by a cosmic ray hit on the ccd). We model the SPSD shape as (cid:26) 0 −Ae−τ (t−tingress) : : t < tingress t > tingress (1) where A and τ are free parameters, and tingress is the reported transit ingress time. 6 http://archive.stsci.edu/kepler Figure 1. An example instrumental feature from Kepler data (Kepler Id 4575824, alias K06428.01), showing the functional forms of the models fit to the event, offset vertically for clarity. The model in each case includes a parabola to describe the shape of the continuum. 5. A parabola plus a box shaped transit, defined as tingress < t < tegress otherwise (2) (cid:26) −d : 0 : where d is a free parameter, while tingress and tegress are constrained so that the transit mid-point is fixed. We include a parabolic term in each model to describe the continuum flux (i.e the flux we would expect if the proposed transit were not present). The algorithm used for co-trending (PDC, Smith et al. 2012) tries to preserve stellar variability, so the continuum is often not flat even on the short time scales of interest here. We show representative examples of the various mod- els in Figure 1. Models 2-4 represent the most com- mon kinds of artifacts we see in the data. Model 1 (the parabola) catches the case where a single strong artifact triggers a detection of a possible planet, and the other reported events show no strong signal. A box (Model 5) is the crudest possible model for the transit shape, but the second order details of ingress shape or limb darken- ing are not expected to be visible in the low SNR case of a single transit of a small planet. The discontinuities in our models present a chal- lenge for many optimization algorithms. We chose the Amoeba, or Nelder-Mead method (Nelder et al. 1965), which does not require the first derivative of the model to be well behaved. We found the Amoeba often con- verged on a local minimum, so we repeated the fit for each model with a variety of initial conditions, and se- lected the best fitting result. We occasionally found transits that lie very close to gaps in the data. The fit is often poor when some of the expected data is missing, so we imposed a stringent Kepler False Alarms 3 requirement that no more than 25% of the expected ca- dences in the selected snippet be missing or gapped be- fore running the algorithm on that event. We select the preferred model using the Bayesian In- formation Criterion (Schwarz 1978). This metric rewards models that fit the data with fewer parameters, and is given by BIC = −2 lnL + k ln N (3) where k is the number of free parameters in the model and N is the number of data points fit. L is likelihood of the fit, defined as L ∝(cid:89) (cid:34) (cid:18) yi − f (tiθ) (cid:19)2(cid:35) exp − 1 2 σ (4) where yi is the value of the ith data point, and f (tiθ) is the value of the model given a set of parameters θ and evaluated at the time of the ith data point. σ is the uncertainty assigned to each data point, calculated in a manner that is robust to outliers in the data √ σ = 1.4826/ 2 × median(abs(yi+1 − yi)) (5) The normalization ensures the computed value of σ is consistent with the value expected if the values of the data points were drawn from a Gaussian distribution. The Gaussian assumption is frequently invalid for Ke- pler lightcurves, but any mismeasurement of σ affects all model fits equally. The model with the lowest value of the BIC is the pre- ferred model. We define the fit score as the difference between the BIC value of the transit fit and the best fit- ting artifact model. Positive scores mean that the arti- fact model is preferred over the box model. Kepler cata- logs adopt the principle of "innocent until proven guilty", erring on the side of including suspected false positives instead of incorrectly rejecting planet candidates. We therefore only reject events as false alarms if they have a score ≥ +10. Kass et al. (1995) argue that a difference in BIC value of 10 or more means the evidence against the disfavored model is very strong, However, the choice of threshold is arbitrary; in the next section we describe how we tuned our algorithm on simulated transits to achieve the desired completeness (fraction of valid tran- sits passed by the algorithm) at the chosen threshold, at the expense of high reliability (fraction of false alarms detected). 3. PERFORMANCE To evaluate the performance of our algorithm we ran it on the simulated transit set used to evaluate the com- pleteness of the Kepler planet finding pipeline as de- scribed by J. L. Christiansen (2016 in prep) and based on the technique of Christiansen et al. (2015). They in- jected a range of physically realistic transits for a range of planet sizes, orbital periods etc. into the pixel level time- series data of all Kepler target stars using the method described in Christiansen et al. (2015). This end-to-end Figure 2. Performance of the algorithm on simulated data. The thick black line shows the percentage of simulated individual tran- sit events passed by Marshall as a function of the chosen threshold. The thin lines show the fraction of simulated artifacts failed at that same score. The more positive the score, the more the transit model is favored. We set a threshold of score > +10 (vertical magenta line) to mark an event as a false alarm. modeling means that the effects on transit shape of the lightcurve generation (PA, Twicken et al. 2010), and sys- tematic removal (PDC, Smith et al. 2012) modules of the pipeline are properly accounted for in our simulation. We selected for our study 104 individual simulated transit events for planets with periods > 200 days and radii < 5 R⊕ that were recovered by the pipeline. We tuned our algorithm until > 95% of these individual events were passed. We then measured the performance of this tuned algorithm against simulated artifacts. As J. L. Christiansen (2016 in prep) did not inject ar- tifact signals in their simulations, we perform our own. We add an artifact model to the lightcurves before co- trending, as produced by the PA module of the pipeline (the SAP FLUX column of the MAST lightcurve file). We cotrend the simulated signal by fitting and removing the appropriate Covariant Basis Vectors produced by the PDC module of the pipeline (Stumpe et al. 2012). These vectors represent the coarse systematic signals in Kepler lightcurves. They are available at MAST7, are described in § 2.3.4 of the Archive Manual, and a tutorial on their use is given in Kinemuchi et al. (2012). PDC uses ad- vanced techniques (Smith et al. 2012; Stumpe et al. 2014) to apply the vectors to the data in an effort to prevent over-fitting of stellar variability. For our purposes, we capture the important behavior of PDC with the compu- tationally simpler direct fits, so we apply those instead. We run 104 simulations over a range of targets and model parameters for each of the discontinuity and SPSD mod- els. We show our results in Figure 2. The thin blue and orange lines show our performance at identifying and rejecting systematic events in our simulations (discon- 7 http://archive.stsci.edu/missions/kepler/cbv 4 Mullally et al. 2. Count Nskip, the number of events where some data, but less than 75% of the expected cadences, were collected. These events are not tested, be- cause the gaps often severely bias the fits leading to inaccurate results. They frequently contain le- gitimate events so are assumed to pass by default. 3. If Ngood +Nskip ≥ 3 then the KOI passes, otherwise it fails. This rule is consistent with the mission requirement of needing at least three transits to claim the transit detection. We apply this test to KOIs in the Q1-Q17 DR24 cata- log with orbital periods > 150 days. We seed our fits with the transit parameters (period, epoch, duration etc.) from Seader et al. (2015) and available at the NASA Exo- planet Archive (Akeson et al. 2013). Although Marshall is tuned for low SNR events, and ignores second order effects on transit shape (such as ingress shape and limb darkening) we find it correctly identifies high SNR events as transits. Our treatment of Nskip has a small effect on our results. From the set of 228 TCEs with periods > 150 days, and not already marked as false positives in the Q1-Q17 DR24 catalog, only 3 additional TCEs are marked as false positive if we require Ngood ≥ 3. We show our results in Figure 3 and Table 1. Of the 228 KOIs tested that were not otherwise failed by the Robovetter, 20 fail our test of having fewer than three valid transits (i.e Ngood + Nskip < 3) mostly at periods > 400 days and radii < 3 R⊕. Visual inspection con- firms the artifact nature of all but two of these KOIs (K05805.01 and K02758.01). False positive identifica- tion in the Q1-Q17 DR24 catalog is made entirely by rule, so these KOIs are marked as false positive in the final catalog in Coughlin et al. (2015) even though visual inspection identifies them as legitimate candidates. 5. DISCUSSION One limitation of our technique is that we must make an assumption as to how the lightcurve would look in the absence of a transit at a given epoch. We choose a simple model of a parabola fit to a small portion of the out-of- transit lightcurve that we find works well in practice, but there are cases of stars that exhibit such rapid variabil- ity that we have difficulty measuring an accurate contin- uum. This causes some of our events to be misidentified. A more sophisticated estimate of the continuum would likely improve performance, but would have to account for impulsive (i.e. short duration) spacecraft events, as well as the variability of the star itself. For the 4% of injected transits that were rejected, we inspected the data to understand why they failed. We show an example in Figure 4. The top panel shows the in- jected event, while the bottom panel shows the lightcurve after long term trends were removed by PDC. In this case, the shape of the transit was deformed to make it look more like a systematic effect. For stars with- out rapid variations in the lightcurve, this is the most common reason why simulated planet candidates were misidentified. However, attempts to use the lightcurves without the detrending from PDC had significantly worse Figure 3. Long period KOIs that pass (open circles) and fail (filled circles) our test. KOIs that fail are clustered at long period and small radius, corresponding to low SNR detections. Almost all are detected with only three transits. Two KOIs detected at low SNR and large radii are not shown on this plot. tinuities and SPSDs respectively) as a function of the threshold value. The vertical magenta line indicates the adopted threshold value of 10 (i.e the transit model has a BIC score at least 10 points higher than the most favored artifact model). At a threshold of 10 we reject 60-70% of the injected events. The thick black line shows the num- ber of injected transits that are preserved by the tech- nique, which is > 96%. These results give us confidence that we can identify many of the false alarm events in the real data, while preserving the signal of most of the real planets. 4. APPLICATION TO THE Q1-Q17 DR24 CATALOG The Q1-Q17 DR24 catalog of KOIs (Coughlin et al. 2015) incorporates results from Marshall. The KOI cre- ation process is described in detail in Rowe et al. (2015). Briefly, a KOI number is assigned to a periodic signal in the lightcurve of a Kepler target that appears to be due to the transit or eclipse of an astrophysical body. KOI numbers are assigned based on a preliminary analy- sis and are sometimes assigned to other phenomena such as stellar variability or instrumental artifacts. Further vetting identifies some more of these artifacts as well as false positive signals due to eclipsing binaries. Any KOI is marked as a planet candidate unless there is conclusive evidence that it is not. A KOI incorporates at least three events equally spaced in time, and Marshall deals with individual events. To apply Marshall to KOIs, we need to choose a disposition (planet candidate or false positive) based on the com- bined scores of individual events. We adopt the following rules: 1. Count Ngood, the number of transit events where > 75% of the expected cadences in the appropriate interval were collected, and where the computed score is < +10. Kepler False Alarms 5 decides if the shape of that event is more likely a transit or one of a few known artifacts. We apply the algorithm to the DR24 planet catalog of Coughlin et al. (2015) and find it rejects 20 small, long period KOIs otherwise marked as planet candidates by the Robovetter. Funding for this Discovery mission is provided by NASAs Science Mission Directorate. All of the data pre- sented in this paper were obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astron- omy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HST data is provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant NNX13AC07G and by other grants and contracts. This research has made use of the NASA Exoplanet Archive, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration un- der the Exoplanet Exploration Program. Facilities: Kepler REFERENCES Akeson, R. L., Chen, X., Ciardi, D., et al. 2013, PASP, 125, 989 Bryson, S. T., Jenkins, J. M., Gilliland, R. L., et al. 2013, PASP, 125, 889 Burke, C. J., Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., et al. 2015, ArXiv:1506.04175 Christiansen, J. L. 2016 in prep Christiansen, J. L., Clarke, B. D., Burke, C. J., et al. 2015, ArXiv:1507.05097 Col´on, K. D., Morehead, R. C., & Ford, E. B. 2015, ArXiv:1506.07057 Coughlin, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., et al. 2015, ArXiv:1512.06149 Coughlin, J. L., Thompson, S. E., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 119 D´esert, J.-M., Charbonneau, D., Torres, G., et al. 2015, ApJ, 804, 59 Fraquelli, D., & Thompson, S. E. 2014, Kepler Archive Manual (KDMC-10008-005) http://archive.stsci.edu/kepler/documents.html Kass, Robert E., & Raftery, Adrian E. 1995, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773 Kinemuchi, K., Barclay, T., Fanelli, M., et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 963 Koch, D. G., Borucki, W. J., Basri, G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L79 Kov´acs, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 2002, A&A, 391, 369 Morton, T. D. 2012, ApJ, 761, 6 Mullally, F. 2015 in prep Mullally, F., Coughlin, J. L., Thompson, S. E., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 31 Nelder J., A., & Mead, R. 1965, , 7, 308 Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 45 Rowe, J. F., Coughlin, J. L., Antoci, V., et al. 2015, ArXiv:1501.07286 Santerne, A., D´ıaz, R. F., Moutou, C., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A76 Schwarz, Gideon 1978, Ann. Statist., 6, 461 Seader, S., Jenkins, J. M., Tenenbaum, P., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 18 Smith, J. C., Stumpe, M. C., Van Cleve, J. E., et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 1000 Figure 4. An example of how PDC can deform the shape of a transit. The top panel shows the lightcurve of Kepler Id 6520870 with a simulated transit (highlighted by the gray bar). The lower panel shows this same data after co-trending by PDC against data from other nearby stars to remove coarse trends. performance due to the more complicated structure in the out-of-transit flux. Although the artifact types we test for create most of the artifacts we are aware of for small, long period planet candidates, there are presumably other sources of systematics not yet accounted for that decrease the sample of planet candidates still further. In addition, our simulations suggest we only find two thirds of our injected false alarms This suggests as many as 10 more false alarms of the kind we tested for remain in the Q1- Q17 DR24 catalog. There are 37 planet candidates with periods longer than 300 days in the catalog. If, similar to the identified false alarms, the uncaught systematics also have periods > 300 days, then we expect no more than 27 (or 73%) of these long period candidates are actually transits. This places a rough upper bound on the reliability of the catalog for small, long period planets. The Kepler Robovetter emphasizes completeness over reliability. Ensuring that as many planets as possible are included as candidates in the catalog is a higher priority than removing as many false positives as possible. Users of the catalog who place a higher value on reliability may prefer to set their rejection threshold at at lower BIC score, at the expense of a decrease in the completeness of their sample. To this end we provide the Marshall score for each KOI tested in Table 1. Finally, we note that the score given in Table 1 is not the probability a KOI is due to a transit. Even KOIs with strong BIC scores may be due to non-planetary sig- nals, such the highly diluted signal of an eclipsing binary system with small angular separation from the target. 6. CONCLUSION We present a new technique to identify systematic sig- nals in Kepler data masquerading as planet candidates. The algorithm looks at each individual transit event and 6 Mullally et al. Table 1 KOIs examined by Marshall KOI Kepler Id TCE NTrans. Period (days) K00998.01 K01099.01 K01788.02 K03549.01 K03674.01 K03681.01 K03709.01 K04959.01 K06254.01 K06295.01 1432214 2853093 2975770 2307206 2446623 2581316 2576107 2987433 1433531 2856960 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 9 4 7 8 7 7 4 3 7 161.788000(36) 161.52800(34) 369.0790(26) 204.029000 0 175.066000(66) 217.832000(77) 205.58300(16) 420.92900(10) 567.676(13) 204.30400(66) Radius (R⊕) 30.140(49) 5.97(76) 2.7(2.4) 44.140000 0 28.6(7.1) 11.410(19) 21.0(2.6) 49.4(1.7) 4.27(46) 13.730(62) Score −2.1 × 104 −5.5 × 101 +2.7 × 101 −1.4 × 105 −4.2 × 103 −8.0 × 104 −2.8 × 103 −5.0 × 105 +3.1 × 101 −1.4 × 103 Note. - Summary of planet candidate KOIs from Q1-Q17 DR24 with periods greater than 150 days examined by Marshall. Kepler Id is the unique identifier of the target star in the Kepler input catalog. TCE indicates the order in which this KOI was found around the target star by the Kepler pipeline in Q1-Q17. NTrans. refers to the number of observed transits as measured by the pipeline. The uncertainty in the last two digits of period and radius are given in parentheses. Period and radius values are taken from Seader et al. (2015) and may differ slightly from the final values in Coughlin et al. (2015). Score represents the confidence Marshall assigns to a KOI. Negative scores indicate high confidence that a KOI is due to a transit while positive scores indicate lower confidence. KOIs with scores >10 are deemed to be false positives. The score given in the table is equal to the score of the 3rd strongest individual event for the KOI, which indicates how close the KOI is to being marked as a false positive. (This table in available in its entirety in the on-line supplementary materials. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.) Stumpe, M. C., Smith, J. C., Catanzarite, J. H., et al. 2014, Torres, G., Fressin, F., Batalha, N. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, PASP, 126, 100 727, 24 Stumpe, M. C., Smith, J. C., Van Cleve, J. E., et al. 2012, Twicken, J. D., Clarke, B. D., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2010, in PASP, 124, 985 Thompson, S. E., Mullally, F., Coughlin, J., et al. 2015, SPIE Ser. 7740, 23 ApJ, 812, 46
1312.4329	1	1312	2013-12-16T12:05:26	The Ginger-shaped Asteroid 4179 Toutatis: New Observations from a Successful Flyby of Chang'e-2	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	On 13 December 2012, Chang'e-2 conducted a successful flyby of the near-Earth asteroid 4179 Toutatis at a closest distance of 770 $\pm$ 120 meters from the asteroid's surface. The highest-resolution image, with a resolution of better than 3 meters, reveals new discoveries on the asteroid, e.g., a giant basin at the big end, a sharply perpendicular silhouette near the neck region, and direct evidence of boulders and regolith, which suggests that Toutatis may bear a rubble-pile structure. Toutatis' maximum physical length and width are (4.75 $\times$ 1.95 km) $\pm$10$\%$, respectively, and the direction of the +$z$ axis is estimated to be (250$\pm$5$^\circ$, 63$\pm$5$^\circ$) with respect to the J2000 ecliptic coordinate system. The bifurcated configuration is indicative of a contact binary origin for Toutatis, which is composed of two lobes (head and body). Chang'e-2 observations have significantly improved our understanding of the characteristics, formation, and evolution of asteroids in general.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The Ginger-shaped Asteroid 4179 Toutatis: New Observations from a Successful Flyby of Chang'e-2 Jiangchuan Huang1 , 3∗, Jianghui Ji2∗, Peijian Ye1, Xiaolei Wang4, Jun Yan5, Linzhi Meng3, Su Wang2, Chunlai Li5, Yuan Li6, Dong Qiao7, Wei Zhao8, Yuhui Zhao2, Tingxin Zhang1, Peng Liu8, Yun Jiang2, Wei Rao3, Sheng Li9, Changning Huang10, Wing-Huen Ip6 , 11, Shoucun Hu2, Menghua Zhu6, Liangliang Yu2, Yongliao Zou5, Xianglong Tang8, Jianyang Li12, Haibin Zhao2, Hao Huang3, Xiaojun Jiang5, & Jinming Bai13 1China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100094, China. 2Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. 3Institute of Space System Engineering, Beijing 100094, China. 4Beijing Institute of Control Engineering, Beijing 100190, China. 5National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China. 6Space Science Institute, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau. 7Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China. 8Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China. 9School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. 10Beijing Institute Of Space Mechanics and Electricity, Beijing 100076, China. 11Institute of Astronomy, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. 12Planetary Science Institute, AZ 85719, USA. 13Yunnan Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650011, China. ∗ The authors contribute equally to this work. To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:[email protected] 1 On 13 December 2012, Chang'e-2 conducted a successful flyby of the near- Earth asteroid 4179 Toutatis at a closest distance of 770 ± 120 meters from the asteroid's surface. The highest-resolution image, with a resolution of better than 3 meters, reveals new discoveries on the asteroid, e.g., a giant basin at the big end, a sharply perpendicular silhouette near the neck region, and direct evidence of boulders and regolith, which suggests that Toutatis may bear a rubble-pile structure. Toutatis' maximum physical length and width are (4.75 × 1.95 km) ±10%, respectively, and the direction of the +z axis is estimated to be (250±5◦, 63±5◦) with respect to the J2000 ecliptic coordinate system. The bifurcated configuration is indicative of a contact binary origin for Tou- tatis, which is composed of two lobes (head and body). Chang'e-2 observations have significantly improved our understanding of the characteristics, forma- tion, and evolution of asteroids in general. Introduction Chang'e-2, the second Chinese probe dedicated to the exploration of the Moon, was launched on 1 October 2010 at 10:59:57 UTC. After it accomplished its primary objective, an extended mission was designed for Chang'e-2 to travel to the Sun-Earth Lagrangian point (L2) and then to an asteroid. On 9 June 2011, Chang'e-2 departed its lunar orbit and headed directly to L2, where it arrived on 25 August 2011 and began to perform space-environment exploration. The asteroid's subsequent flyby mission remained under consideration, and eventually, asteroid 4179 Toutatis was selected as the primary target for the flyby after considering the leftover fuel of the spacecraft, the capability of the tracking and control network, and the fact that the asteroid's closest approach to Earth would occur on 12 December 2012. An undisclosed story is that Chang'e-2 was intentionally controlled to move near L2 for more than 230 days to favor 2 the Toutatis-flyby injection maneuvers. On 15 April 2012, Chang'e-2 left L2. On 1 June 2012, the spacecraft began its mission to Toutatis. Chang'e-2 implemented the flyby on 13 December 2012 at 8:29:58.7 UTC at a closest distance of 770 ± 120 (3σ) meters from Toutatis' surface at a high relative velocity of 10.73 km s−1, with highest-resolution images of better than 3 meters per pixel1 . As of 14 July 2013, Chang'e-2 is still traveling into outer space over 50 million kilometers away from Earth, and it is the first successful multiple-type-objective probe in history that has ever visited the Moon, a Lagrangian point, and an asteroid. Asteroids are remnant building blocks of the formation of the Solar System. They provide key clues to understanding the process of planet formation, the environment of the early Solar nebula, and even the occurrence of life on Earth. Toutatis, as an Apollo near-Earth asteroid in an eccentric orbit that originates from the main belt, was a good target for Chang'e-2's flyby mission because this asteroid is full of fascinating puzzles. The 3-D shape of Toutatis has been well reconstructed, and its spin state has been determined, from extensive radar measurements taken at Arecibo and Goldstone2 -- 9 since 1992 during its closest approaches to Earth, once every four years. The results indicate that Toutatis is characterized as a non-principal-axis rotator; this tumbling asteroid rotates about its long axis with a period of 5.4 days, and the long-axis precession period is 7.4 days7 ; this precession may be induced by the Earth's tides during each close-in flyby10 and the Yarkovsky-O'Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack (YORP) effect11 . Moreover, detailed geological features, such as complex linear structures and concavities, have been re- vealed in Hudson et al.'s model5 at an average spatial resolution of ∼ 34 m. Hence, the primary issue of concern is whether the derived radar models accurately represent the real appearance of Toutatis. Furthermore, some features such as boulders and regolith on its surface have been speculated to exist in previous radar models5, 6 . It was hoped that this mystery could be solved by obtaining optical images during a spacecraft's close flyby. Furthermore, small asteroids at the km scale are believed to have a so-called rubble-pile structure, which means that they consist 3 of a loose collection of fragments under the influence of gravity. Therefore, the second major question arises -- whether Toutatis is also an agglomeration of gravitationally bound chunks with such a fragile structure. The optical images of Toutatis were obtained using one of the onboard engineering cameras, which were originally designed to monitor the deployment of solar panels on the spacecraft and to photograph other objects (such as the Earth and Moon) in space. The camera that is capable of color imaging has a lens with a focal length of 54 mm and a 1024-by-1024-pixel CMOS detector, and it has a field of view (FOV) of 7.2◦ by 7.2◦. A solar panel shields the camera from sunlight to help minimize stray light. The FOV was partly occulted by the solar panel, and thus some of the images were cut off from the early gallery. As part of the imaging strategy, Chang'e- 2 maneuvered to adjust the camera's optical axis to lie antiparallel to the direction of the relative velocity vector between the probe and Toutatis. Imaging during the inbound trajectory was not ideal because there was a large Sun-Toutatis-Chang'e-2 phase angle of ∼ 143.6◦. Therefore, Chang'e-2 completed an attitude adjustment approximately an hour ahead of the flyby epoch to prepare for the outbound imaging. The overall imaging time was approximately 25 minutes, and the interval for each snapshot was 0.2 seconds. During the mission, the spacecraft collected more than 400 useful images totaling 4.5 GB of data. Figure 1 shows several outbound images of Toutatis. Panel e, which was the first panoramic image, was taken at a distance of ∼ 67.7 km at a resolution of ∼ 8.30 m (see Supplementary Figure 1), whereas panel a, which was the third in a sequence of images, corresponds to an imaging distance of ∼ 18.3 km at a local resolution of ∼ 2.25 m, as shown in Fig. 1. The present highest-resolution optical image has a resolution that is significantly finer than the 3.75 m resolution of the known radar model8, 9 , although the radar images cover nearly the entire surface of Toutatis, whereas the optical images cover only one side of Toutatis' surface. 4 Results We tested several methods to directly establish the 3-D model of Toutatis based on the opti- cal images collected by Chang'e-2. However, there is no satisfactory outcome because of the narrow viewing angle and the local high-resolution images. Therefore, 3-D models developed based on delay-Doppler radar measurements5, 8, 9 were adopted to discern the attitude of Toutatis in the approaching epoch. Based on the attitude of the probe and its camera, the relative position between the asteroid and the probe, and optical images, in combination with the models of Hudson et al. and Busch et al.5, 8, 9 , which were utilized to match the spin state of Toutatis (see Supplementary Figure 2), the direction of the principal axis was measured to be (250 ± 5◦, 63 ± 5◦) with respect to the J2000 ecliptic coordinate system5, 12 , and the fundamental parameters are summarized in Table 1. Our result is in good agreement with the previous prediction8 , which indicates that Toutatis' spin status was greatly changed because of tidal interaction with the Earth during the 2004 flyby, which had a closest distance of ∼ 0.01 AU8, 10 . Furthermore, we again measured Toutatis' physical size from the images, and its maximum length and width were estimated to be (4.75 × 1.95 km) ±10%, respectively (see Supplementary Section 3). New Geological Features from Chang'e-2 Observation The shape of Toutatis resembles that of a ginger root (Fig. 1), where the bifurcated asteroid mainly consists of a head (small lobe) and a body (large lobe). The two major parts are not round in shape, and their surfaces have a number of large facets. In particular, at the end of the body, there appears to be a huge square concavity, which could be of large-impact origin. Regarding the asteroid's appearance, craters are more prominent on Toutatis than on Itokawa. In contrast, we clearly see fewer boulders on Toutatis, although many smaller blocks may have been missed because of the resolution of Chang'e-2 flyby images. 5 In comparison with the radar models3 -- 5 , the proximate observations from Chang'e-2's flyby have revealed several remarkable discoveries concerning Toutatis, among which the presence of the giant basin at the big end appears to be one of the most compelling geological features, and the sharply perpendicular silhouette in the neck region that connects the head and body is also quite novel. A large number of boulders and several short linear structures (Fig. 1) are also apparent on the surface, although the lack of sharp contact in the radar model may be an effect of the SHAPE software13 . Concavities The giant basin at the big end of Toutatis has a diameter of ∼ 805 m, and we surmise that one or more impactors may have collided with the asteroid in this region, thereby gouging out such an enormous basin. Judging by the contrast of its relatively subdued relief with large impact basins on other asteroids, Mathilde and Eros, this large-end depression may be attributable to the internal structure of the large lobe, with smaller impact features overlying it. The most sig- nificant feature is the ridge around the largest basin. The wall of this basin exhibits a relatively high density of lineaments, some of which seem to be concentric to the basin. There are also several linear structures outside the basin that are roughly parallel to the basin rim (Fig. 2a). These ridges are indicative of an internal structure on small bodies14, 15 . Most of the ridges near the largest basin at the big end are most likely related to the huge stress energy during impact. The interior material in the deep region would have been scattered across Toutatis' surface by the large impact that formed the basin, leading to the fracturing of the asteroid. Hence, one may speculate that the asteroid most likely has a rubble-pile internal structure. More than fifty craters have been identified from the flyby images, and they have diameters ranging from 36 to 532 m (with an average of ∼ 141 m). ∼ 44% of the craters exceed 100 m in diameter, which is consistent with Hudson et al.'s model. From the close-up image, a crater 6 of high morphological integrity (with a diameter of ∼ 62 m) can be clearly observed, whereas tens of boulders (with lengths of ∼ 20-30 m) are randomly distributed nearby (Fig. 2b). Two concavities are closely carved into the surface: the larger (with a diameter of ∼ 368 m) has a relatively vague outline, whereas the smaller (with a diameter of ∼ 259 m) has a relatively clear edge. Based on their appearance, we suspect that the relatively smaller, young crater (marked with the letter B) is superimposed on the larger, ancient crater (marked with the letter A) (Fig. 2a). Although the images show that parts of the observed surface areas have a high degree of exposure, the topographical features of the craters were identified based on visual inspection and automatic annotation. Therefore, we identified craters on the large and small lobes individually, including vaguely shaped candidate craters on the highly exposed areas, for the investigation of the cumulative and relative size-frequency distributions (see Supplementary Section 4)16 . Figure 3 indicates that the surfaces of the two lobes are very likely to share a similar cratering history because their relative size-frequency profiles for craters17 look alike throughout a range of diameters. Furthermore, the craters on the two lobes are not in saturation equilibrium, as the two profiles do not tend toward stability with increasing crater diameter (Fig. 3a). An abundance of craters would suggest that Toutatis suffered from many impacts of interplanetary projectiles in the past. Boulders From the flyby images, more than thirty boulders can be clearly discerned. They have lengths that range from 12 to 81 m, with an average of ∼ 32 m. Approximately 90% of the boulders are less than 50 m in diameter. The largest boulder, along with other large boulders, is located near the neck region (Fig. 2a). It is believed that a large ejected fragment is empirically associated with a large crater18, 19 . The boulders are suggested to be those non-escaping ejecta that re- 7 impact onto the asteroid's surface within a short timescale20 . Recently, the Goldstone radar images of 12 December 2012 have also suggested that several 10-m-scale bright features may be boulders8 . However, the optical images, although they were collected on only one side of the asteroid, have an advantage over the radar models5, 8 in uncovering local fine features on the surface of Toutatis. Regolith Two craters in the neck area are indicative of the granular flows in the inner flanks. The upper regolith near the craters is fine grained, whereas the lower is relatively coarse, and very many fragments are present (Fig. 2a). Such a structure may indicate the redistribution of regolith via downslope or resurfacing processes, which may be related to the inclined terrain and the orienta- tion of gravity20 . The results are in good agreement with those of polarimetric observations21, 22 , thereby indicating that Toutatis is covered with fine regolith made up of light-transmitting materials. The same features have also been reported on Lutetia's surface23 . Furthermore, the characteristics once again suggest that Toutatis' surface may consist of a fine granular or regolith layer with the porosity of lunar soils4 . The latest results imply that this asteroid may bear an undifferentiated L-chondrite surface composition24 . There is additional evidence that supports the existence of regolith on Toutatis' surface. The average thermal inertia for Toutatis may have a low profile, according to an empirical relation between the thermal inertia and the effective diameter25 . For a non-principal-axis rotator such as Toutatis, the global redistribution of regolith that results from lofting may also be one of the factors that contributes to the low surface thermal inertia25 . A considerable number of mm- sized grains may constitute Toutatis' regolith (Fig. 2b), and the regolith depth on the surface might range from several centimeters to several meters. Clearly, Toutatis' thermal inertia seems to be much less than that of Itokawa26 ; thus, the terrain of Toutatis is a bit smoother than that 8 of Itokawa, and the boulders on Toutatis' surface are less numerous than those on Itokawa's surface, which is mostly embedded with numerous pebbles and gravel in all regions. Linear Structures Several types of linear structures, which are primarily composed of troughs and ridges that appear to be common for small asteroids27, 28 , can be easily observed on Toutatis' surface. Notable linear structures are apparent in the radar models5 ; however, the flyby images do not identify any linear features that have been previously reported because the relevant part of the surface was invisible to Chang'e-2. The present linear structures, which are similar to the short linear structures of Itokawa, are clearly observed29 to have a length of 120-330 m in the visible regions of the images. The troughs, which are similar in appearance to groove-like features, are primarily scattered over the small lobe; they have an average length of ∼ 170 m, and they are approximately orientated along the long axis of the asteroid (Fig. 2a). Generally, troughs are related to extensions resulting from tensile stress in the plane of the surface15 . Consequently, they may be produced by the tensile stresses that arise from nearby impact cratering or other geological processes. Discussion As mentioned above, the existence of the giant basin and its surroundings provides direct ev- idence that Toutatis is likely to be a rubble-pile asteroid. In this case, the asteroid could re- assemble itself into a weak aggregate of large fragments via a heavy impact or many smaller impacts; in this manner, the large interior voids could absorb the collision energy and further resist huge collisions in the formation process. Furthermore, a vast majority of S-type asteroids appear to possess rubble-pile structures with an average porosity of ∼ 15% - 25%30 . Recent investigations have demonstrated that the typical bulk density of L ordinary chondrites is ∼ 3.34 9 g cm−3 24, 30 . Assuming a density of 2.1 - 2.5 g cm−3 20 , Toutatis may have a porosity in the range ∼ 25% to ∼ 37%, thereby implying that it may be an intermediate body between Eros (∼ 20%30) and Itokawa (∼ 41%26) with respect to surface features. Moreover, strong evidence from N-body simulations indicates that two km-sized objects with rubble-pile structures would produce Toutatis-like objects31 . In summary, we may conclude that Toutatis is not a monolith but most likely a coalescence of shattered fragments. The bifurcated configuration means that Toutatis is comprised of two major lobes, similar to Itokawa, thereby implying that Toutatis is a contact binary, which is an asteroid type that may constitute more than 9% of the NEA population. Km-sized contact binaries, such as 4486 Mithra and 4769 Castalia, share an irregular, significantly bifurcated shape32 . The following question then arises: how do these contact binaries form? Several formation mechanisms have been proposed to produce such bifurcated configura- tions. The first scenario supposes that the two major lobes were two separate objects, which were moving at a sufficiently low relative speed to yield a contact binary26 . The difference in the orientations of head and body may be indicative of their diverse origins and further suggests that the two parts were once detached. The second scenario includes the YORP and binary YORP (BYORP) effects, which are likely to form contact binaries33 , especially for those ob- jects with slow rotational periods. In this scenario, two components, which may be major fragments of a parent body, suffer re-impact and recombination, thereby leading to the forma- tion of a bifurcated configuration. The third scenario suggests that catastrophic collisions may have gouged out the giant basin and a number of craters on Toutatis' surface. The boulders near three potential arc depression terrains (Figure 2a) imply that the head may have experienced severe impacts. Last but not least, tidal disruption from a close encounter with a terrestrial planet is also likely to play a role in the formation of such a contact binary. In short, the above- mentioned scenarios may have actually occurred during Toutatis' history. Hence, we infer that 10 Toutatis may be a reconstituted contact binary. The Chang'e-2 flyby has revealed several new discoveries regarding Toutatis, e.g., the giant basin at the big end, the sharply perpendicular profile about the neck region, and direct images of distributed boulders and surface regolith. It is the first time that geological features on Toutatis' surface have been observed so clearly. All these observations suggest that Toutatis may bear a rubble-pile structure, similar to other S-type asteroids, such as Itokawa. Moreover, the close-up imaging results for the asteroid provide further indication that the bifurcated configuration that is related to the formation of contact binaries appears to be quite common among the NEA population. The observations of Chang'e-2 have significantly improved our understanding of the formation and evolution of these building blocks of the Solar System. Methods To adapt to Chang'e-2's characteristics of high control accuracy and the wide FOV of 7.2◦ by 7.2◦ of the engineering camera, a close-approach strategy and a specific imaging design were developed. As shown in Supplementary Figure 1, L, S, and ∆t represent the minimum distance of rendezvous, the imaging distance, and the time interval between two sequential images, respectively. The camera optical axis pointed in the direction of the relative velocity between the probe and Toutatis, which remained nearly unchanged during the flyby. After a short time at the closest approach, the camera captured Toutatis; the asteroid was contained in the FOV, but the imaging size decreased as the departure distance increased. By solving the geometric relation between Image 2 and Image 3, the distances L and S and the resolution of each image were determined for the Chang'e-2 observations. Taking into account the various characteristics of the specific approach design and imaging strategy for the flyby, a physical size of (4.75 × 1.95 km) ±10% for the illuminated region of the asteroid surface was statistically estimated from the sequence of images recorded by the 11 CMOS detector during the flyby. The determined size is in good agreement with that of the radar model5 (see Supplementary Sections 1 and 3). The attitude of a rigid body in space is determined by its rotations around three axes of an orthogonal coordinate system. To define the attitude of Toutatis in each optical image (Supple- mentary Figure 2a), the three axes l1, l2, and l3 are defined as follows: l1 and l2 extend through Toutatis' centroid in the images along the directions of the long axis and short axis, respectively, and are perpendicular to each other. l3 is perpendicular to the imaging plane and constitutes a right-handed coordinate system with l1 and l2. To match its shape to the optical images, we rotated the model of Busch et al. in intervals of 5◦ for each Euler angle around the three axes of the body-fixed coordinate system in space. Next, we chose three criteria of the orientation of the asteroid's long-axis, the ratio of length to width, and the obvious topographical feature at the joint of the two lobes of Toutatis -- to ensure that the radar model agreed with the optical images from Chang'e-2, as shown in Supplementary Figure 2a. The most approximate attitude was finally obtained by rotating the radar model and comparing it with the optical image, as shown in Supplementary Figure 2b. The coordinate transformation from the asteroid's body-fixed system to the J2000.0 equatorial coordinate system were expressed in terms of three components of Euler angles. The directions of the principal axes were then obtained according to the attitude of the radar model. The craters and other geological features were identified via both visual inspection and auto- matic annotation. In this case, dozens of low-lying regions were noted, and their positions, con- tours, and sizes were obtained using surface-structure-analysis techniques. The feature points on the edge of each crater were labeled manually based on the treatment of the imaging process and the radar model. After the points were marked, a piecewise-quadratic curve was fitted to them, and closed curves were obtained as contour profile. The sizes of the craters (and boulders) were calculated based on the resolution for each image and the fitted contour profiles. 12 References [1] Huang, J. C. et al. The engineering parameters analysis of (4179) Toutatis flyby mission of Chang'e-2. Science China Technological Sciences 43, 596-601 (2013). [2] Hudson, R. S. & Ostro, S. J. Shape and non-principal axis spin state of Asteroid 4179 Toutatis.Science 270, 84-86 (1995). [3] Ostro, S. J. et al. Radar images of Asteroid 4179 Toutatis. Science 270, 80-83 (1995). [4] Ostro, S. J. et al. Asteroid 4179 Toutatis: 1996 radar observations. Icarus 137, 122-139 (1999). [5] Hudson, R. S., Ostro, S. J. & Scheeres, D. J. High-resolution model of Asteroid 4179 Toutatis. Icarus 161, 346-355 (2003). [6] Busch, M. W. et al. Determining asteroid spin states using radar speckles. Icarus 209, 535- 541 (2010). [7] Busch, M. W. et al. Twenty years of Toutatis. EPSC-DPS2011 6, 297 (2011). [8] Busch, M. W. et al. Internal structure of 4179 Toutatis. 2012 AGU Fall Meeting, P31A-1873 (2012). [9] Takahashi, Y., Busch, M. W. & Scheeres, D. J. Spin State and Moment of Inertia Charac- terization of 4179 Toutatis, AJ 146, 95 (2013). [10] Scheeres, D. J. Rotational fission of contact binary asteroids. Icarus 189, 370-385 (2007). [11] Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlicky, D., Rubincam, D. P. & Broz, M. in Asteroids III (eds. Bottke, W. F. et al.)(Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, 2002). 13 [12] Scheeres D. J., Ostro S. J., Werner R A, et al. Effects of gravitational interactions on asteroid spin states. Icarus 147, 106-118 (2000). [13] Magri, C. et al. Radar observations and a physical model of Asteroid 1580 Betulia Icaurs 186, 152-177 (2007) [14] Prockter, L. et al. Surface expressions of structural features on Eros. Icarus 155, 75-93 (2002). [15] Thomas, N. et al. The geomorphology of (21) Lutetia: Results from the OSIRIS imaging system onboard ESA's Rosetta spacecraft. Planet. Space Sci. 66, 96-124 (2012). [16] Zou, X.D. et al. Preliminary analysis of the 4179 Toutatis snapshots of the Chang'e-2 fly-by. Icarus, in press (2013). [17] Arvidson, R. E. et al. Standard techniques for presentation and analysis of crater size- frequency data. Icarus 37, 467-474 (1979). [18] Gault, D. E., Shoemaker, E. M. & Moore, H. J. Spray ejected from the lunar surface by meteoroid impact. NASA Technical Document TND-1767, 1-39 (1963). [19] Thomas, P. C., Veverka, J., Robinson, M. S. & Murchie, S. Shoemaker crater as the source of most ejecta blocks on the asteroid 433 Eros. Nature 413, 394-396 (2001). [20] Scheeres, D. J., Ostro, S. J., Hudson, R. S., DeJong, E. M. & Suzuki, S. Dynamics of orbits close to Asteroid 4179 Toutatis. Icarus 132, 53-79 (1998). [21] Mukai, T. et al. Polarimetric observations of 4179 Toutatis in 1992/1993. Icarus 127, 452- 460 (1997). 14 [22] Hudson, R. S. & Ostro, S. J. Photometric properties of Asteroid 4179 Toutatis from lightcurves and a radar-derived physical model. Icarus 135, 451-457 (1998). [23] Vincent, J. B., Besse, S., Marchi, S., Sierks, H. & Massironi, M. Physical properties of craters on asteroid (21) Lutetia. Planet. Space Sci. 66, 79-86 (2012). [24] Reddy, V. et al. Composition of near-Earth Asteroid (4179) Toutatis. Icarus 221, 1177- 1179 (2012). [25] Delbo', M., dell'Oro, A., Harris, A. W., Mottola, S. & Mueller, M. Thermal inertia of near-Earth asteroids and implications for the magnitude of the Yarkovsky effect. Icarus 190, 236-249 (2007). [26] Fujiwara, A. et al. The rubble-pile asteroid Itokawa as observed by Hayabusa. Science 312, 1330-1334 (2006). [27] Thomas, P. C. & Prockter, L. M. in Planetary Tectonics(eds. Watters, T. R & Schultz, R. A.) (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010). [28] Robinson, M. S., Thomas, P. C., Veverka, J., Murchie, S. L. & Wilcox, B. B. The geology of 433 Eros. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 37, 1651-1684 (2002). [29] Demura, H. et al. Pole and global shape of 25143 Itokawa. Science 312, 1347-1349 (2006). [30] Britt, D. T., Yeomans, D., Housen, K. & Consolmagno, G. in Asteroids III(eds. Bottke, W. F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., & Binzel, R. P.)(Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, 2002). [31] Richardson, D. C., Leinhardt, Z. M., Melosh, H. J., Bottke, W. F. Jr. & Asphaug, E. in Asteroids III(eds. Bottke, W. F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., & Binzel, R. P.)(Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, 2002). 15 [32] Benner, L. A. M. et al. Near-Earth Asteroid 2005 CR37: radar images and photometry of a candidate contact binary. Icarus 182, 474-481 (2005). [33] Steinberg, E. & Sari, R. Binary YORP effect and evolution of binary asteroids. AJ 141, 55 (2011). [34] Krivova, N. V., Yagudina, E. I, & Shor, V. A. The orbit determination of (4179) Toutatis from optical and radar data. Planet. Space Sci. 42, 741-745 (1994). [35] Milani, A., & Gronchi, G. Theory of orbit determination. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010). Supplementary Information is available in the online version of the paper. Acknowledgements The authors thank Michael W. Busch for his constructive comments that greatly helped to improve the original content of this manuscript. We thank the whole Chang'e- 2 team to make the mission a success. We appreciate B. Yang for target observations before the flyby mission. We are grateful to R.P. Butler for English improvement of this manuscript. This research was supported by National Science and Technology Major Project, National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Innovative and Interdisciplinary program by CAS, and Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences (2013DP173302), CAS. JYL's contribution to this work is not supported by any funds. 16 Authors Contributions J. C. H. was the leader of the asteroid mission. J. H. J. wrote the manuscript with contributions from other co-authors. J.C.H., P.J.Y. and T.X.Z. were responsible for the overall project design of the flyby mission to Toutatis, imaging strategy, and proposed the method of fundamental parameter analysis. H.B.Z., J.H.J., S.C.H., S.W., Y.H.Z., Y.J. and L.L.Y. contributed to ground-based observation, refined the trajectory solution for Toutatis, completed data analysis, prepared for figures and wrote the manuscript. L.Z.M, H.H. and W.R. took charge of overall design of probe system and data analysis. X.L.W. was responsible for controlling the attitude and the spacecraft's orbit, and contributed to the engineering parameters analysis. J.Y., C.L.L., Y.L.Z. and X.J.J. took charge of data collection, data pretreatment and the ground- based observation. Y.L. and M.H.Z. partly contributed to contents and prepared for figure. D.Q. contributed to the target selection and the design of transfer orbit. W.Z., P.L. and X.L.T. were in charge of the algorithm of optical images and obtained the image information. S.L. was responsible for imaging process. C.N.H. developed the optical camera and determined the parameters of the camera. W.H.I and J.Y.L. contributed ideas and discussions in preparation for the manuscript. J.M.B. partly participated in the target observation. All authors contributed to the manuscript. Authors information The authors declare no competing financial interests. To whom corre- spondence should be addressed. E-mail:[email protected]. 17 Figure 1 Outbound images of Toutatis acquired on 13 December, 2012 during Chang'e-2 flyby, indicative of the spacecraft being away from the asteroid (from a to e). The left side of Toutatis is blocked by the solar panel in images a-d.The imaging distance (D), epoch of flyby (T, UTC) and resolution of each image (R) are shown for each snapshot, where the distance error for a is 1.1 km. The resolution of each image is linear with the distance. . 18 Figure 2 All kinds of geological features on the Toutatis' surface. (a) All craters (blue profiles) and boulders (red squares) are outlined in the panoramic image of Toutatis. Two craters are closely distributed: the smaller crater (B) seemed to superimpose on the larger one (A). Green lines indicate the lineaments. Black arrows point the flow direction of the fine-grained regolith. (b) The enlarged portion shown (white box) in the left panel (a). A morphological- integrity crater can be observed. Tens of boulders are randomly distributed around. 19 Figure 3 (a)The relative size-frequency distribution for craters on Toutatis. (b) The cumu- lative size-frequency distribution for craters on Toutatis. In panel (a) R plot was devised by the Crater Analysis Techniques Working Group17 to better show the size distribution of craters and crater number densities for determining relative ages. The vertical position of the curve is a measure of crater density or relative age on the Toutatis: the higher the vertical position, the higher the crater density and the older the surface. In panel (b) x-axis stands for the crater diameter and y-axis represents the crater number larger than corresponding diameter on the investigated area. CSFD would easily inform that the size of craters distribute as diameters increase. 20 Table 1. Parameters for Toutatis. Property Osculating Orbital elements a=2.5336 AU, e=0.6301 Value Special type Size (diameter) Major axes Rotational properties Rotation Precession Pole position in the space Density Ω=124.3991◦ i=0.4466◦ , ω=278.6910◦ , M=6.7634◦ S (IV)5 (x=4.60±0.10 km, y=2.29±0.10 km, z=1.92± 0.10 km)5 (x=4.46±0.10 km, y=2.27±0.10 km, z=1.88± 0.10 km)9 5.4 day2, 5 7.4 day2, 5 β = 250 ± 5◦, λ = 63 ± 5◦ λ = 60.6◦8, 9 β = 54.6◦, α = 258 ± 5◦, δ = 40 ± 5◦ 2.5 g cm−3 20 Using the data released by the Minor Planet Center34, 35 and optical data from the ground- based observational campaign sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, we determined Toutatis' orbit with uncertainties on the order of several kilometers. Osculating orbital elements were calculated for the flyby epoch of 13 December 2012 at 8:30 UTC, where a, e, i, Ω, ω, and M are the semi-major axis, the eccentricity, the inclination, the longitude of the ascending node, the argument of perihelion, and the mean anomaly, respectively. β, λ and α, δ are the longitudes and latitudes of the long axis of the asteroid in the J2000.0 ecliptic and equatorial coordinate systems, respectively. 21
1806.06089	1	1806	2018-06-15T18:34:22	An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Broad absorption signatures from alkali metals, such as the sodium (Na I) and potassium (K I) resonance doublets, have long been predicted in the optical atmospheric spectra of cloud-free irradiated gas-giant exoplanets1,2,3. However, observations have only revealed the narrow cores of these features rather than the full pressure-broadened profiles4-6. Cloud and haze opacity at the day-night planetary terminator are considered responsible for obscuring the absorption-line wings, which hinders constraints on absolute atmospheric abundances7-9. Here we present an optical transmission spectrum for the 'hot-Saturn' WASP-96b obtained with the Very Large Telescope, which exhibits the complete pressure-broadened profile of the sodium absorption feature. The spectrum is in excellent agreement with cloud-free, solar-abundance models assuming chemical equilibrium. We are able to measure a precise, absolute sodium abundance of log\epsilon_Na=6.9+0.6-0.4, and use it as a proxy to the planet's atmospheric metallicity relative to the solar value (Z_p/Z_\star=2.3+8.9/--1.7). This result is consistent with the mass-metallicity trend observed for solar-system planets and exoplanets10-12.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet Nikolay Nikolov1, David K. Sing1,2, Jonathan J. Fortney3, Jayesh M. Goyal1, Benjamin Drummond1, Tom M. Evans1, Neale P. Gibson4, Ernst J. W. De Mooij5,6, Zafar Rustamkulov3, Hannah R. Wakeford7, Barry Smalley8, Adam J. Burgasser9, Coel Hellier8, Christiane Helling10,11, Nathan J. Mayne1, Nikku Madhusudhan12, Tiffany Kataria13, Josef Baines4, Aarynn L. Carter1, Gilda E. Ballester14, Joanna K. Barstow15, Jack McCleery4 & Jessica J. Spake1 1 Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QL, UK. 2 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA 3 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 4 Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK. 5 School of Physical Sciences, and Centre for Astrophysics & Relativity, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. 6 Centre for Astrophysics & Relativity, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Ireland 7 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA. 8 Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Keele, UK. 9 Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.. 10 Centre for Exoplanet Science, SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS, UK. 11Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 12 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, CB3 0HA Cambridge, UK. 13 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, USA. 14 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. 15 Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, UK. e-mail: [email protected] Broad absorption signatures from alkali metals, such as the sodium (Na I) and potassium (K I) resonance doublets, have long been predicted in the optical atmospheric spectra of cloud-free irradiated gas-giant exoplanets1,2,3. However, observations have only revealed the narrow cores of these features rather than the full pressure-broadened profiles4-6. Cloud and haze opacity at the day-night planetary terminator are considered responsible for obscuring the absorption-line wings, which hinders constraints on absolute atmospheric abundances7-9. Here we present an optical transmission spectrum for the 'hot-Saturn' WASP-96b obtained with the Very Large Telescope, which exhibits the complete pressure-broadened profile of the sodium absorption feature. The spectrum is in excellent agreement with cloud-free, solar-abundance models assuming chemical equilibrium. We are able to measure a precise, absolute sodium abundance of 𝐥𝐨𝐠 𝛆𝐍𝐚=𝟔.𝟗,𝟎.𝟒/𝟎.𝟔, solar value (𝐙𝐩/𝐙⨀=𝟐.𝟑,𝟏.𝟕/𝟖.𝟗). This result is consistent with the mass- and use it as a proxy to the planet's atmospheric metallicity relative to the metallicity trend observed for solar-system planets and exoplanets10-12. WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 We observed two transits of the hot Saturn WASP-96b (planetary mass 𝑀:= (0.48±0.03) 𝑀B, 𝑅:= (1.20±0.06) 𝑅B, 𝑇HI=1285±40K)13 on 2017 combined cover the wavelength range 3600 to 8200 Å. We used a mask brightness. Broad slits spanning 22″ along the dispersion and 120″ along the July 29th and August 22nd UT in photometric conditions, using the 8.2-metre Unit Telescope 1 of the Very Large Telescope, with the FORS2 spectrograph. Data were collected in the multi-object-spectroscopy mode using grisms 600B (blue) and 600RI (red) on the first and second nights, respectively, which consisting of two broad slits centred on the target and on a reference star of similar spatial (perpendicular) axis were used in order to minimise slit losses due to seeing variations and guiding imperfections. 0.120 ) s R / p 0.118 a clear, Burrows profile, χ2=49 clear, Allard profile, χ2=50 cloud deck, χ2=69 haze, χ2=76 Na Li K 10 R ( o i t a r s u d a r r a i t t s − o − e n a P t l ) s R / p R ( o i t i a r s u d a r r a t t s − o − e n a P t l b 0.116 0.114 0.112 0.110 0.120 0.120 0.118 0.118 0.116 0.116 0.114 0.114 0.112 0.112 Na Na Li K Figure 1 Transmission spectrum of WASP-96b compared to models. a: Comparison of the FORS2 observations (black dots with 1𝜎 vertical error bars; the horizontal bars indicate spectral bin widths) with clear3,16, cloudy and hazy one-dimensional forward atmospheric models at solar abundance14 (continuous lines). The two best-fit models assume a clear atmosphere with different line broadening shapes for Na and K (see text for details). Models with hazes or clouds (magenta and blue) predict much smaller and narrower absorption features. b: Similar to the upper panel, but showing the best-fit model obtained from the retrieval analysis (red line) binned to the data resolution (red dots), with the 1s, 2s and 3s confidence intervals (blue regions). 8 6 4 2 0 i l t h g e H e a c S e r u s s e r P −2 10 8 6 4 2 0 t i l h g e H e a c S e r u s s e r P 0.110 0.110 .3 .3 H2 Rayleigh .4 .4 .5 .5 .6 .6 .7 .7 Wavelength (µm) −2 .8 .8 .9 .9 For each transit, we produced wavelength-integrated "white" and spectroscopic light curves for WASP-96 and the reference star by integrating the flux of each spectrum along the dispersion axis. We corrected the light curves for extinction caused by the Earth's atmosphere by dividing the flux of the target by the flux of the reference star. We modelled the transit and systematic effects of the white-light curves by treating the data as a Gaussian Process (GP) and assuming quadratic limb darkening for the star. The transit parameters: mid-time (𝑇OPQ), 2 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet orbital inclination (𝑖), normalised semi-major axis (𝑎/𝑅), planet-to-star radius ratio (𝑅:/𝑅) and the two limb-darkening coefficients (𝑢U and 𝑢V), were allowed to vary in the fit to each of the two white-light curves, while the orbital period was held fixed to the previously determined value. The white-light curves and results from the modelling are shown in Extended Data Figure 1 and Table 1. are the elemental abundances with the uncertainties of the host star (dotted lines and blue regions) and the Sun (dash-dotted lines in grey regions from ref.25). Figure 2 Retrieved atmospheric properties for WASP-96b. Histograms of the marginalized posterior distributions from a free retrieval. a, b, Negligible opacity from clouds and hazes comprises the evidence for a clear atmosphere at the limb of the planet. c-e, Retrieved elemental abundances in the scale of ref.23, which ranges from 0 to 12 with the abundance of hydrogen log𝜀[=12. The abundance of Na, log𝜀\]=6.9,_.'/_.a is the only constrained quantity (c). The vertical continuous and dotted lines indicate the mean abundances and 1𝜎 uncertainties, respectively. Shown width of 160 Å. Wavelength-independent systematics were corrected following standard practices, as detailed in Methods. We allowed only 𝑅:/𝑅* and 𝑢U to darkening coefficients (𝑢V) were fixed to their theoretical values. To account for vary. The rest of the system parameters were fixed to their weighted mean values from the analysis of the two white-light curves, while the quadratic limb- To obtain the transmission spectrum, we produced 28 and 35 spectroscopic light curves, from the blue and red grisms, respectively, with a systematics, we marginalised over a grid of polynomials, where the latter consisted of terms up to second order in air mass and drift of the spectrum across the detector along both the dispersion and cross-dispersion axes. The resulting time series are shown in Extended Data Figure 2 and 3. 3 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 The measured wavelength-dependent relative planet radii are shown in Figure 1, which comprises the transmission spectrum of WASP-96b. The spectrum reveals the absorption signature of the pressure-broadened sodium D line with wings covering ~6 atmospheric pressure scale heights (1 scale height corresponds to ~610 km, assuming 𝑇HI=1285K), in a wavelength range from ~5000 to ~7500 Å, and a slope at near-UV wavelengths due to Rayleigh scattering by molecular hydrogen. The radius measurements around the potassium feature show no obvious broadened line wing shape or larger absorption at the line cores. To interpret the measured transmission spectrum, we first compare it with clear, cloudy and hazy atmospheric models with solar abundances from ref. 14. We find that cloud-free models assuming chemical equilibrium best fitted the 49 data points, giving 𝜒V=49 and 𝜒V=50 for a total of 48 degrees of freedom. Models with clouds and hazes, i.e. 100× enhanced-Rayleigh scattering cross- section (haze) and 100× enhanced wavelength-independent (cloud) opacity, give 𝜒V of 69 and 76 respectively, and are disfavoured at ~3𝜎 and ~5𝜎 confidence, respectively (Figure 1). Further details are provided in Methods. 1000.0 100.0 10.0 1.0 0.1 l ) r a o s × ( y t i c i l l a t e M ⛢♆ WASP−39b HST+VLT ♃ ♄ WASP−96b VLT Constraining constituent: Na H2O CH4 0.10 1.00 0.01 Mass (× Jupiter) 10.00 Figure 3 Mass-metallicity diagram for Solar System planets and exoplanets. Figure 3 Mass-metallicity diagram for solar system planets and exoplanets. Methane (CH4) and water (H2O) are the two absorbing constituents used to constrain the Methane (CH4) and water (H2O) are the two absorbing constituents used to constrain atmospheric metallicity of solar system planets (blue bars) and hot gas-giant exoplanets the atmospheric metallicity of solar system planets (blue bars) and hot gas-giant (orange squares with grey error bars), respectively. Absorption lines from atomic Na (red exoplanets (orange squares with grey error bars), respectively. Absorption lines triangles) can provide another proxy to exoplanet atmospheric metallicity, which has been from atomic Na (red triangles) can provide another proxy to exoplanet atmospheric done by combining three HST and two VLT transits for WASP-39b. With detected and metallicity, which has been done by combining three Hubble Space Telescope (HST) resolved pressure-broadened Na line wings, WASP-96b is the first transiting exoplanet for and two Very Large Telescope (VLT) transits for WASP-39b. With its detected and which high-precision atmospheric metallicity has been constrained using data only from resolved pressure-broadened Na line wings, WASP-96b is the first transiting exoplanet the ground. for which high-precision atmospheric metallicity has been constrained using data line indicates a fit to the Solar System gas giants (pale blue symbols indicate Solar System planets). only from the ground. Each error bar corresponds to the 1𝜎 uncertainty. The blue The wing shape of atomic absorption lines is a result of the combined contribution of the quantum mechanical (natural), thermal (or Doppler) and collisional (or pressure) broadening mechanisms15. Measurements of the shape of 4 6 7 8 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet pressure-broadened line wings can provide important constraints on the interaction potentials used in the theory of stellar and sub-stellar atmospheres16,17. While, such constraints have been obtained from Na and K absorption lines in the spectra of brown dwarfs18,19, the actual shape of the profiles for exoplanets remain unconstrained. To assess the detection of sodium line-broadening we compared the spectrum to models with no broadened lines. Compared to the best-fit clear-atmosphere model, the narrow-line model is found to be rejected at the 5.8𝜎 confidence level. This is in contrast to WASP-39b, WASP-17b and HD209458b, which have previously been classified as having the clearest atmospheres of the known exoplanets. The latter transmission spectra are well-explained with narrow alkali features, implying that the broad absorption wings are masked by clouds and hazes4,5,20,21. The broad sodium feature measured for WASP-96b therefore provides a unique opportunity to constrain the pressure-broadened line shape for an exoplanet atmosphere. We compared the observed spectrum to two cloud-free models, assuming alkali line-wing shapes from refs. 3 and 16. We find each of them to be statistically consistent with the data, although the wing profile of ref. 3 is marginally preferred (Figure 1, red and orange models). covered by three of our measurements. Throughout this letter, we adopt the or haze opacity, which indicates that the atmosphere of WASP-96b is free of clouds and hazes at the pressures being probed at the limb. The best-fit transmission spectrum includes opacity from Na, Li, K and Rayleigh scattering To further interpret the physical properties of WASP-96b's atmosphere, we performed a retrieval analysis of the data using the 1D radiative-convective ATMO model22. We assumed an isothermal atmosphere and allowed the temperature, radius, opacity from clouds and hazes and elemental abundances of Na and K to vary. In addition, Li is expected to add opacity at ~6650 Å, which is astronomical scale of logarithmic abundances of ref. 23, where hydrogen (H) is defined to be 𝑙𝑜𝑔 𝜀[=12. The abundance of a particular element X is defined as log𝜀m=log(𝑁m/𝑁[)+12, where 𝑁m and 𝑁[ are the number densities of elements X and H. Our retrieval analysis finds negligible contributions from cloud (Figure 1). We obtain a tight constrain of log 𝜖\]= 6.9,_.'/_.a on the sodium model gives 𝜒V=39 for 42 degrees of freedom. 𝜒V value when excluding the two species is only slightly higher than when they are included (∆𝜒V=2). However, we include the two species in our retrieval atmospheric temperature of T= 1710,V__/Us_K, which is somewhat higher, compared with the planet's equilibrium temperature of THI=1285±40K under model to marginalise the Na abundance over the possibility of their presence and estimate upper-limits on their abundances. The abundances of K and Li are also found to depend on the assumed profile shape of the Na feature. We find an abundance, which is in agreement with the solar abundance as well as with the measured sodium abundance in the WASP-96 host star (Figure 2). The best-fit The current data does not support detections of K or Li, as the minimum the assumption of zero albedo and uniform day-night heat redistribution 13. 5 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 GRIS600B GRIS600RI Orbital period (day) eccentricity TOPQ (JD) i (°) a/R* R:/R* uU uV A (ppm) h(cid:135)(cid:136)[(cid:137) (arbitrary normalisation) hm (arbitrary normalisation) c_ h(cid:140) (arbitrary normalisation) cU TOPQ (JD) i (°) a/R* R:/R* uU uV A (ppm) h(cid:141)(cid:142)(cid:143) (arbitrary normalisation) hm (arbitrary normalisation) c_ h(cid:140) (arbitrary normalisation) cU i (°) a/R* uU uV uU uV R:/R* R:/R* Weighted mean: GRIS600RI 3.4252602 (fixed) 0 (fixed) 4013 – 6173 Å 57963.33672,_.___(cid:129)(cid:129) /_.___(cid:129)' 85.21,_.U(cid:130)/_.U(cid:131) 8.93,_.U(cid:131)/_.U(cid:131) 0.1141,_.__U' /_.__Us 0.399,_._(cid:129)_ /_._sa 0.148,_._'_ /_._(cid:130)s 501,(cid:130)V/U_(cid:130) 1.01,_.(cid:138)(cid:138)/U.V −3.45,_.s(cid:130)/_.(cid:130)_ −1.86,U._U/_.(cid:131)(cid:131) 0.9992,_.___Ua /_.___U(cid:130) −0.00068,_.___UV /_.___UV 5268 – 8308 Å 57987.31195,_.___V(cid:138) /_.___V(cid:138) 85.11,_.UV/_.UV 8.80,_.UV/_.UU 0.1172,_.__U(cid:130) /_.__U(cid:130) 0.26,_._(cid:131)/_.UU 0.23,_._(cid:138)/_.UV 2301,(cid:130)'U/Ua(cid:138)_ 0.50,_.a(cid:138)/_.(cid:131)(cid:130) 2.81,_.(cid:130)a/_.(cid:138)' 8.08,V.s/(cid:129).s 0.9980,_.__U(cid:129) /_.__Ua 0.00018,_.___V(cid:131) /_.___V(cid:138) 85.14±0.10 8.84,_.U_/_._(cid:138) (fixed i, a/R* and TOPQ) 0.1147,_.__U' /_.__U' 0.435,_._V_ /_._(cid:129)s 0.173,_._VV /_._'U (fixed i, a/R* and TOPQ) 0.1168,_.__U' /_.__Us 0.282,_._(cid:129)V /_._s(cid:129) 0.250,_._(cid:129)V /_._s(cid:129) Extended Data Table 1 System parameters Parameter Value GRIS600B Heavy element abundance measurements are important to constrain formation mechanisms of gas-giant exoplanets. Under the core-accretion paradigm, as the planet mass decreases the atmospheric metallicity increases24,25. As giant planets accrete H/He-dominated gas as they form, they also accrete planetesimals26 that enrich their H/He envelopes in metals. A low-mass H/He envelope has smaller amount of gas for these metals to be mixed into, leading to a higher metal enrichment compared to the parent star. This is also the scenario for solar system gas-giants, where metallicity has been constrained from methane (CH4) abundance from in-situ or infrared-spectroscopy27-30, showing increasing 6 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet enrichment of heavy elements with decreasing mass (Figure 3). Measurements of H2O abundances have been used to constrain atmospheric metallicities for a small sample of exoplanets10-12. The measured molecular abundances are used as proxies to atmospheric metallicities, assuming chemical equilibrium conditions. Using our measurement of the absolute sodium abundance of WASP-96b, we estimate an atmospheric metallicity of 𝑍:/𝑍⊙= 2.3,U.(cid:130)/(cid:131).(cid:138), i.e. log (𝑍:/𝑍⊙) =0.4,_.s/_.(cid:130). This is consistent with the heavy element abundance of the host star 𝑍∗/𝑍⊙ =1.4±0.7 which we estimate using the relation 𝑍∗/𝑍⊙ =10[(cid:135)H/[] , where [Fe/H] = 0.14±0.19. While our WASP-96b measurement is consistent with the solar system mass-metallicity trend (see Figure 3), we note that additional high- precision constraints would be necessary to further support or refute a trend for exoplanets. WASP-96b is the first exoplanet for which the pressure-broadened wings of an atomic absorption line (Na I) have been observed, probing deeper layers of the atmosphere at the limb. This observation has also enabled a precise atmospheric abundance constraint, using ground-based data alone. Our result demonstrates that combined with near-UV data, the ~5890Å Na absorption feature is a valuable probe of exoplanet metallicities accessible to ground-based telescopes over a wavelength region largely free of contamination by telluric lines. WASP-96b is the first gas-giant with a detected broad atomic absorption feature out of approximately 20 exoplanets so far characterized in transmission. This demonstrates the significant role a future ground-based optical spectrograph, optimized for transmission spectroscopy, could play. With the clearest atmosphere of any exoplanet characterized so far, WASP-96b will be an important target for the upcoming James Webb Space Telescope. Online Content Any Methods, including any statements of data availability and Nature Research reporting summaries, along with any additional references and Source Data files, are available in the online version of the paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586- 018-0101-7. Received: 27 November 2017; Accepted: 30 January 2018; Published online: 07 May 2018 1. Seager, S. & Sasselov, D. Theoretical transmission spectra during extrasolar giant planet transits. Astrophys. J. 537, 916–921 (2000). 2. Sudarsky, D. et al. Albedo and reflection spectra of extrasolar giant planets, Astrophys. J. 538, 885-903 (2000). 3. Burrows, A. et al. The near-infrared and optical spectra of methane dwarfs and brown dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 531, 438-446 (2000). 4. Charbonneau, D. et al. Detection of an extrasolar planet atmosphere. Astrophys. J. 568, 377-384 (2002). 5. Sing, D. K. et al. A continuum from clear to cloudy hot-Jupiter exoplanets without primordial water depletion. Nature 529, 59-62 (2016). 6. Wyttenbach, A. et al. Hot exoplanet atmospheres resolved with transit spectroscopy (HEARTS). I. Detection of hot neutral sodium at high altitudes on WASP-49b, Astron. Astrophys. 602, 36-50 (2017). 7. Fortney, J. J. et al. On the indirect detection of sodium in the atmosphere of the planetary companion to HD 209458. Astrophys. J. 589, 615-622 (2003). 7 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 8. Line, M. R. & Parmentier, V. The influence of nonuniform cloud cover on transit transmission spectra. Astrophys. J. 820, 78-89 (2016). 9. Benneke, B. & Seager, S. Atmospheric retrieval for super-Earths: uniquely constraining the atmospheric composition with transmission spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. 753, 100-122 (2012). 10. Kreidberg, L. et al. A precise water abundance measurement for the hot Jupiter WASP-43b. Astrophys. J. 793, 27-33 (2014). 11. Line, M. R. et al. No thermal inversion and a solar water abundance for the hot Jupiter HD 209458b from HST/WFC3 spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. 152, 203-217 (2016). 12. Wakeford, H. et al. HAT-P-26b: A Neptune-mass exoplanet with a well- constrained heavy element abundance. Science 356, 628-631 (2017). 13. Hellier, C. et al. Transiting hot Jupiters from WASP-South, Euler and TRAPPIST: WASP-95b to WASP-101b. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 440, 1982 (2014). 14. Fortney, J. J., Lodders, K., Marley, M. S. & Freedman, R. S. A unified theory for the atmospheres of the hot and very hot Jupiters: two classes of irradiated atmospheres. Astrophys. J. 678, 1419–1435 (2008). 15. Collins, G. W. The Fundamentals of Stellar Astrophysics. New York, W.H. Freeman and Co. 512p. (1989). 16. Allard, N. F. et al. A new model for brown dwarf spectra including accurate unified line shape theory for the Na I and K I resonance line profiles. Astron. Astrophys. 411, 473-476 (2003). 17. Burrows, A. & Volobuyev, M. Calculations of the far-wing line profiles of sodium and potassium in the atmospheres of substellar-mass objects. Astrophys. J., 583, 985-995 (2003). 18. Johnas, C. M. S. The effects of new Na I D line profiles in cool atmospheres. Astron. Astrophys. 466, 323-325, (2007). 19. Burgasser, A. J. The spectra of T dwarfs. II. Red optical data. Astrophys. J. 594, 510-524 (2003). 20. Nikolov, N. et al. VLT FORS2 comparative transmission spectroscopy: detection of Na in the atmosphere of WASP-39b from the ground. Astrophys. J. 832, 191-200 (2016). 21. Helling, Ch. et al. The mineral clouds on HD 209458b and HD 189733b. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460, 855-883 (2016). 22. Tremblin, P. Fingering convection and cloudless models for cool brown dwarf atmospheres. Astrophys. J. 804, 17-23 (2015). 23. Asplund, M. et al. The Chemical composition of the Sun. Ann. Rev. of Astron. Astrophys. 47, 481-522 (2009). 24. Fortney, J. J., et al. A Framework for characterizing the atmospheres of low- mass low-density transiting planets. Astrophys. J. 775, 80-93 (2013). 25. Pollack, J. B. et al. Formation of the giant planets by concurrent accretion of solids and gas. Icar. 124, 62-85 (1996). 26. Mordasini, C. et al. Extrasolar planet population synthesis. IV. Correlations with disk metallicity, mass, and lifetime. Astron. Astrophys. 541, 97-120 (2012). 27. Wong, M. H. et al. Updated Galileo probe mass spectrometer measurements of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur on Jupiter. Icar. 171, 153-170 (2004). 28. Fletcher, L. N. et al. Methane and its isotopologues on Saturn from Cassini/CIRS observations. Icar. 199, 351-367 (2009). 29. Karkoschka, E. & Tomasko, M. G. The haze and methane distributions on Neptune from HST-STIS spectroscopy. Icar. 211, 780-797 (2011). 8 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet 30. Sromovsky, L. A. et al. Methane on Uranus: The case for a compact CH 4 cloud layer at low latitudes and a severe CH 4 depletion at high-latitudes based on re- analysis of Voyager occultation measurements and STIS spectroscopy. Icar. 215, 292-312 (2011). Acknowledgements. This work is based on observations collected at the European Organization for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere under European Southern Observatory programme 199.C-0467(H). The research leading to these results received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement number 336792. A.J.B. is a US/UK Fulbright Scholar. J.M.G. and N.J.M. acknowledge support from a Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant. J.K.B. is a Royal Astronomical Society Research Fellow. Author Contributions N.N. led the design of the VLT FORS2 Large Programme and the scientific proposal (with contributions from N.P.G., D.K.S. and T.M.E.). N.N. led the observations, analysis, comparison with forward models and the interpretation of the result. D.K.S. led the atmospheric retrievals (with contributions from J.M.G.). J.J.F. and Z.R. provided forward atmospheric models for comparative analysis. B.S. and C.H. provided elemental abundances of the host star. N.N. wrote the manuscript (with contributions from D.K.S. and T.M.E.). J.B. and J.McC. performed independent tests on various parts of the data reduction and analysis as part of their final-year undergraduate projects under supervision from N.P.G. All authors discussed the results and commented on the draft. Author Information Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests. Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of the paper. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to [email protected] 9 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 Extended Data Table 2 Transmission spectrum 𝒖𝟏 0.484 ± 0.059 0.553 ± 0.059 0.539 ± 0.053 0.493 ± 0.052 0.458 ± 0.054 0.464 ± 0.049 0.479 ± 0.043 0.522 ± 0.039 0.415 ± 0.043 0.422 ± 0.042 0.404 ± 0.038 0.385 ± 0.040 0.337 ± 0.041 0.367 ± 0.044 0.410 ± 0.038 0.288 ± 0.043 0.336 ± 0.040 0.260 ± 0.039 0.349 ± 0.047 0.299 ± 0.042 0.330 ± 0.046 0.303 ± 0.050 0.284 ± 0.044 0.263 ± 0.044 0.270 ± 0.041 0.236 ± 0.049 0.242 ± 0.050 0.169 ± 0.053 0.316 ± 0.044 0.235 ± 0.041 0.194 ± 0.045 0.185 ± 0.046 0.267 ± 0.043 0.250 ± 0.040 0.192 ± 0.038 0.155 ± 0.044 0.087 ± 0.042 0.100 ± 0.052 0.129 ± 0.051 0.104 ± 0.044 0.156 ± 0.048 0.277 ± 0.038 0.102 ± 0.050 0.263 ± 0.046 0.147 ± 0.042 0.190 ± 0.049 0.189 ± 0.049 0.175 ± 0.053 0.214 ± 0.059 𝒖𝟐 0.207 0.219 0.223 0.227 0.231 0.235 0.239 0.242 0.246 0.251 0.255 0.256 0.258 0.262 0.269 0.273 0.275 0.277 0.278 0.283 0.287 0.290 0.291 0.295 0.296 0.296 0.297 0.302 0.313 0.314 0.314 0.314 0.313 0.313 0.313 0.314 0.314 0.314 0.314 0.315 0.315 0.315 0.316 0.316 0.315 0.315 0.315 0.314 0.314 10 𝑹𝒑/𝑹* 0.11479 ± 0.00152 0.11447 ± 0.00182 0.11382 ± 0.00167 0.11554 ± 0.00167 0.11459 ± 0.00205 0.11321 ± 0.00163 0.11505 ± 0.00129 0.11466 ± 0.00123 0.11462 ± 0.00125 0.11361 ± 0.00116 0.11282 ± 0.00100 0.11324 ± 0.00130 0.11440 ± 0.00104 0.11451 ± 0.00138 0.11326 ± 0.00112 0.11318 ± 0.00101 0.11317 ± 0.00096 0.11444 ± 0.00089 0.11365 ± 0.00095 0.11361 ± 0.00089 0.11322 ± 0.00102 0.11541 ± 0.00095 0.11499 ± 0.00095 0.11653 ± 0.00084 0.11685 ± 0.00092 0.11648 ± 0.00086 0.11607 ± 0.00086 0.11545 ± 0.00081 0.11487 ± 0.00096 0.11648 ± 0.00099 0.11457 ± 0.00096 0.11499 ± 0.00091 0.11553 ± 0.00100 0.11284 ± 0.00089 0.11532 ± 0.00081 0.11442 ± 0.00117 0.11189 ± 0.00078 0.11311 ± 0.00090 0.11483 ± 0.00096 0.11428 ± 0.00085 0.11463 ± 0.00097 0.11572 ± 0.00094 0.11357 ± 0.00081 0.11405 ± 0.00096 0.11473 ± 0.00075 0.11312 ± 0.00109 0.11341 ± 0.00096 0.11336 ± 0.00123 0.11287 ± 0.00117 𝝀 (Å) 3500−4013 4013−4093 4093−4173 4173−4253 4253−4333 4333−4413 4413−4493 4493−4573 4573−4653 4653−4733 4733−4813 4813−4893 4893−4973 4973−5053 5053−5133 5133−5213 5213−5293 5293−5373 5373−5453 5453−5533 5533−5613 5613−5693 5693−5773 5773−5853 5853−5933 5933−6013 6013−6093 6093−6173 6173−6253 6253−6333 6333−6413 6413−6493 6493−6573 6573−6653 6653−6733 6733−6813 6813−6973 6973−7053 7053−7133 7133−7213 7213−7293 7293−7373 7373−7453 7453−7533 7533−7693 7693−7773 7773−7853 7853−7933 7933−8013 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet METHODS Observations. We observed two transits of WASP-96b with the FOcal Reducer and Spectrograph (FORS2)31 attached on the Unit Telescope 1 (UT1, Antu) of the Very Large Telescope (VLT) at the European Southern Observatory (ESO) on Cerro Paranal in Chile as part of Large Program 199.C-0467 (PI: Nikolov). We used similar observing setup and strategy to our VLT FORS2 Comparative Transmission Spectroscopy of WASP-39b and WASP-31b22,32. During the two transits, we monitored the flux of WASP-96 and one detector (MIT), which is a mosaic of two chips. We positioned the instrument field of view such that each detector imaged one source. The field of view was monitored without guiding interruptions during the full observing campaigns. To reference star at photometric conditions. The reference star, known as 2MASS 00041885-4716309 is the only bright source in the FORS2 field of view and is located at an angular separation of 5'.3 away from the target. Fortunately, the reference is of similar colour and brightness, which reduced the effect of differential colour extinction. For example, the magnitude differences (target minus reference) from the PPMXL33 catalogue are ΔB=−0.46, ∆R=−0.49, ∆I=−0.5. We observed both transits with the same slit mask and the red improve the duty cycle, we made use of the fastest available read-out mode (200 kHz, ~30s). During both nights, we ensured that the Longitudinal Atmospheric (hereafter blue and 600B), which covers the spectral range from 3600 to 6200 Å at a resolving power of R ~ 600. The field of view rose from an airmass 1.43 to 1.08 and set to an airmass of 1.16. The seeing oscillated around 0.5" during the first 3.5 hours and gradually increased to 1.2" at the end of the observation. We GRIS600RI (hereafter red and 600RI), which covers the range from 5400 to 8200 Å, in combination with the GG435 filter to isolate the first order. The field of view rose from an air mass of 1.23 to 1.08 and set at an airmass of 1.36. The seeing varied between 0.3" and 0.5" as measured from the cross-dispersion collected a total of 89 exposures for ~5h with an integration times adjusted between 120 and 230s. Dispersion Corrector (LADC) is in its neutral position, i.e. inactive. During the first night, we used the dispersive element GRIS600B During the second night, we exploited the dispersive element profiles of the spectra. We monitored WASP-96 and the reference star for ~5h20m and collected a total of 233 spectra with integration times between 30 and 80s. Calibrations and data reduction. We performed data reduction and analysis using a customized IDL pipeline22. We started by subtracting a bias frame and by applying a flat field correction to the raw images. We computed a master bias and flat field by obtaining the median of 100 individual frames. Cosmic rays were identified and corrected following the routine detailed in ref. 34. We extracted 1D spectra using IRAF's APALL task. To trace the stars, we used a fit of a Chebyshev polynomial of two parameters. We performed background correction by subtracting the median 11 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 located away from the spectral trace. We found that aperture radii of 14 and 12 pixels and sky regions 21:72 and 23:74 minimize the dispersion of the out-of- background from the stellar spectrum for each wavelength, computed from a box transit flux of the band-integrated white light curves for the blue and red observations, respectively. 4000 4500 5000 5500 Wavelength (Å) 6000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 100 10 1 1.04 1.02 1.00 0.98 1.00 WASP−96 Reference star 2017/07/29 GRIS600B Raw light curves A: WASP−96/Reference best−fit GP model (transit+systematics) WASP−96 Reference star 2017/08/22 GRIS600RI 3 0 1 × s n o r t c e e o t o h P l t n a t s n o c + x u l f w a r d e z i l a m r o N t n a t s n o c + x u l f e v i t l a e r d e s i l a m r o N ) m p p ( l i a u d s e R 100 10 1 1.01 1.00 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.97 500 0 −500 detrended light curve 0.99 B: best−fit transit model 0.98 0.97 500 0 −500 A/B: common−mode correction −3 −2 −1 0 1 Time since mid−transit (hr) Time since mid−transit (hr) −2 2 −3 −1 0 1 2 Extended Data Figure 1 VLT FORS2 stellar spectra and white-light curves. Left and right column panels show the GRIS600B (blue) and GRIS600RI (red) data sets, respectively. First row: example stellar spectra used for relative spectrophotometric calibration. The dashed lines indicate the wavelength region used to produce the white-light curves. Second row: normalised raw light curves of both sources. Third row: Normalised relative target-to-reference raw flux along with the marginalized GP model (A), detrended transit light curve and model (B), and the common-mode correction (A/B), Fourth row: Best-fit light curve residuals and 1𝜎 error bars, obtained by subtracting the marginalized transit and systematics models from the relative target-to-reference raw flux. The two light curve residuals show dispersion of 78 and 201 parts-per-million (ppm), respectively. 12 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet We performed a wavelength calibration of the extracted stellar spectra using spectra of an emission lamp, obtained after each of the two transit observations with a mask identical to the science mask, but with slit widths of 1". We established a wavelength solution for each of the two stars with a low-order Chebyshev polynomial fit to the centres of a dozen lines, which we identified by performing a Gaussian fit. To account for displacements during the course of each observation and relative to the reference star, we placed the extracted spectra on a common Doppler-corrected rest frame through cross-correlation. All spectra were found to drift in the dispersion direction to no more than 2.5 pixels, with instrument gravity flexure being the most likely reason. Example spectra of WASP-96 and the reference star are shown in Extended Figure 1. We achieved typical signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) of 315 and 280 per pixel for the central wavelength of the blue grism and 313 and 257 for We produced white light curves from 4013 to 6173 and from 5293 to 8333 Å the red grism, respectively. We then used the extracted spectra to produce band- integrated white and spectroscopic light curves for each source and transit by summing up the flux along the dispersion axis in each bandpass. White light curve analysis. systematics) in the data: for the blue and red observations, respectively. We corrected the raw flux of the target by dividing by the raw flux of the reference star. This correction removes the contribution of Earth's atmospheric transparency variations, as demonstrated in Extended Data Figure 1. We modelled the white light transits and instrumental systematics simultaneously by treating the data as a Gaussian process (GP)35-37. We performed the GP analysis using the Python GP library George38-41. Under the GP assumption, the data likelihood is a multivariate normal distribution with a mean function 𝜇 describing the deterministic transit signal and a covariance matrix Κ that accounts for stochastic correlations (i.e. poorly-constrained 𝑝( 𝑓 𝜃,𝛾) = 𝒩 (𝜇,Κ), where 𝑝 is the probability density function, 𝑓 is a vector containing the flux measurements, 𝜃 is a vector containing the mean function parameters, 𝛾 is a function containing the covariance parameters, 𝒩 is a multivariate normal distribution. We defined the mean function 𝜇 as follows: 𝜇(𝑡,𝑡;𝑐_,𝑐U,𝜃)= 𝑐_+𝑐U𝑡Τ(𝑡;𝜃), where 𝑡 is a vector of all central exposure time stamps in Julian Date (JD), 𝑡 is a and divided by the standard deviation, 𝑐_ and 𝑐U describe a linear baseline trend, Τ(θ) is an analytical expression describing the transit and 𝜃=(𝑖,𝑎/ 𝑅,𝑇‹›fi,𝑅fl/𝑅,𝑢U,𝑢V), where 𝑖 is the orbital inclination, 𝑎/𝑅, is the normalized semi-major axis, 𝑇‹›fi is the central transit time, 𝑅fl/𝑅 is the planet- to-star radius ratio, 𝑢U and 𝑢V are the linear and quadratic limb darkening coefficients. To obtain an analytical transit model Τ, we used the formulae found vector containing all standardized times, i.e. with subtracted mean exposure time in ref. 42. We fixed the orbital period to its value from ref. 13 and fitted for the remaining system parameters. 13 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 Extended Data Figure 2 Spectrophotometric light curves from grism 600B offset by a constant amount for clarity. First panel: raw target-to-reference flux. Second panel: common-mode corrected light curves and the transit and systematics models, with the highest evidence. Third panel: detrended light curves and the transit model with the highest evidence. Fourth panel: residuals with the 1-s error bars. The dashed lines indicate the median residual level, with dotted lines indicating the dispersion and the reached percentage of the theoretical photon noise limit (blue). 14 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet parameter (𝑢U,𝑢V) quadratic law and computed the values of the coefficients We accounted for the stellar limb-darkening by adopting the two- using a three-dimensional stellar atmosphere model grid43. In these calculations, we adopted the closest match to the effective temperature, surface gravity and metallicity of the exoplanet host star found in ref. 13. The choice of a quadratic versus a more complex law, e.g. the four-parameter non-linear law of ref. 44 was motivated by the study of refs. 45 and 46, where the two-parameter law has been demonstrated to introduce negligible bias on the measured properties of transiting systems similar to WASP-96. In addition, the quadratic law requires much shorter computational time for the relevant transit light curve. We computed the theoretical limb-darkening by fitting the limb-darkened intensities of the 3D stellar atmosphere models, factored by the throughputs of the blue and red grisms. Κ=𝜎›V𝛿›–+𝑘›–, where 𝜎› are the photon noise uncertainties, 𝛿›– is the Kronecker delta function and 𝑘›– is a covariance function. We assumed the white noise term was the same for all data points and allowed it to vary as a free parameter, 𝜎‡. For the covariance function, we choose to use the Matérn 𝜈 = 3/2 kernel with the spectral dispersion and cross-dispersion drifts 𝑥 and 𝑦, respectively as input and the speed of the rotation angle 𝑧 (see Extended Data Figure 4). As with the variables, FWHM, measured from the cross-dispersion profiles of the 2D spectra The covariance matrix is defined as linear time term, we also standardised the input parameters prior to the light curve fitting. We chose to use the dispersion and cross-dispersion drifts for both observations, and combined them with the FWHM for the blue data and the speed of the rotation angle for the red data, respectively. Our choice was justified based on the fact that those combinations of input parameters gave well-behaved residuals. The covariance function then was defined as: 𝑘›–=ΑV(1+ 3𝐷›–) exp ( − 3𝐷›–), where Α is the characteristic correlation amplitude and +(𝑧›−𝑧–)V +(𝑦›−𝑦–)V 𝐷›–= (𝑥›−𝑥–)V 𝜏(cid:190)V 𝜏‰V 𝜏…V where 𝜏…, 𝜏‰ and 𝜏(cid:190) are the correlation length scales and the hatted variables are standardised. We allowed parameters 𝑋= (𝑐_,𝑐U,𝑇‹›fi,𝑖,𝑎/𝑅,𝑅fl/𝑅,𝑢U,𝑢V) and 𝑌= (Α,𝜏…,𝜏‰,𝜏(cid:190)) to vary and fixed the orbital period 𝑃 to its literature value13. We adopted uniform priors for 𝑋 and log-uniform priors for 𝑌. To marginalise the posterior distribution 𝑝 (𝜃,𝛾 𝑓) ∝ 𝑝 (𝑓 𝜃,𝛾) 𝑝 (𝜃,𝛾) we made use of the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) software package emcee40. We identified the maximum likelihood solution using the Levenberg–Marquardt least-squares algorithm47 and initialised three groups of 150 walkers close to that maximum. We run groups one and two for 350 samples and the third group had 4500 samples. Before running for the second group we re-sampled the positions of the walkers in a narrow space around the 15 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 We computed the weighted mean values of the orbital inclination and semi-major axis and repeated the fits. In the second fit we allowed only the position of the best walker from the first run. This extra re-sampling step was useful because otherwise some of the walkers can start in a low likelihood area of parameter space and would require more computational time to converge. Transit models for each of the two observations computed using the marginalized posterior distributions are shown in Extended Data Figure 1 and the relevant parameter values are reported in Extended Data Table 1. We find residual dispersion of 79 and 203 parts-per-million for the blue and red light curves, respectively. Both values are found to be within 80% of the theoretical the photon noise limit. to the weighted mean values and the central times were fixed to the values determined from the first fit. Spectroscopic light curve analysis. We produced spectroscopic light curves by summing the flux of the target and planet-to-star radius ratio (𝑅fl/𝑅*) and the two limb darkening coefficients (𝑢U and 𝑢V) to vary, while the orbital inclination and semi-major axis were held fixed reference star in bands with a width of 160Å. The sodium D lines at 5890 and 5896Å fall inside the spectral range of each grism, within their overlapping region from 5300 to 6200Å. We centred the set of bins for each night on the pairs of bins, covering the O2 A and B bands from 7594 to 7621 and from 6867 to 6884 Å, respectively to increase the signal to noise ratio of the corresponding sodium line, which gave the advantage of obtaining two radius measurements identical in wavelength coverage within that overlapping region. We merged two light curves. The very first band in the blue grism was also enlarged with the same motivation. With these customizations at hand we produced a total of 63 light curves. Common mode factors The FORS2 spectroscopic light curves are known to exhibit wavelength independent (common mode) systematic, as demonstrated from our Comparative Transmission Spectroscopy studies22,32 and other FORS2 results48-50. This makes the instrument outstanding for transmission spectroscopy, with enormous potential to explore the diversity of exoplanet atmospheres. We established the wavelength independent systematic using the band-integrated white light curves for each of the two nights. We simply divided the white-light transit light curves by a transit model. We computed the transit model using the weighted mean values of the orbital inclination and normalized semi-major axis from both nights and assumed the central times found from the white light analysis. The values for the relative radius and the limb darkening coefficients were identified by repeating the GP fit where the transit central time, orbital inclination and semi- major axis were held fixed to the weighted-mean values. The fitted relative radii and limb-darkening coefficients are reported at the end of Extended Data Table 1. The common mode factors for each night are shown in Extended Data Figure 1 along with a schematic explanation of the full white-light curve analysis. 16 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet Extended Data Figure 3 Same as Extended Data Figure 2 but for grism 600RI. 17 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 Spectroscopic light curve fits We modelled the spectroscopic light curves using a two-component function that takes into account the systematics and transit simultaneously. The transit model was computed using the analytical formulae of ref. 42, as for the white light curve, but we allowed in the fits only the relative planet radius (𝑅fl/𝑅∗) and the linear limb darkening coefficient (𝑢U) to vary. Fitting only for the linear limb- uncertainty of 𝑢V is large and consistent with the theoretical prediction. We significantly change we chose to fix 𝑢V and to fit only for 𝑢U. Prior to fitting the darkening coefficient is a standard practice for ground-based observations that has been proven to generally perform well51-56. Similar to our WASP-39b study with FORS222, we also fit for both limb-darkening coefficients and found that the interpret this as an indication for insufficient constraining power of the data for the non-linear coefficient. However, as the transmission spectra did not spectroscopic light curves, we removed the common mode factors from each night by dividing each of the spectroscopic light curves to the corresponding common-mode light curve of the same night. We accounted for the systematics using a low-order polynomial (up to a second degree with no cross terms) of dispersion and cross-dispersion drift, air mass, FWHM variations and the rate of change of the rotator angle (Extended Data Figure 4). We produced all possible combinations of detrending variables and performed separate fits with each combination with the systematics function included in the two-component model. For each attempted function, we computed the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)57 to estimate statistical weight of the model depending on the number of degrees of freedom. We marginalized the resulting relative radii and linear limb- darkening coefficient following ref. 58. We chose to rely on the AIC instead of other information criteria, e.g. the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)59, because the AIC selects more complex models, resulting in more conservative error estimates. We note that a marginalization over multiple systematics functions relies on the assumption of equal prior weights for each tested model. This assumption is valid for simple polynomial expansions of basis parameters, as the ones in our study. We found systematics models, parameterized with a linear air mass, dispersion drift and FWHM terms to result in the highest evidence. Prior to each fit, we set the uncertainties of each spectrophotometric channel to values that are based on the expected photon noise with additional component from readout noise. We determined best-fit models using a Levenberg-Marquardt least-squares algorithm and rescaled the uncertainties of the fitted parameters with the dispersion of the residuals. All residual outliers larger than 3𝜎 were excluded from the analysis. We found that for each spectroscopic light curve ≤3 data points were removed. We also assessed the modelling the binned variance with 𝜎V= (𝜎‡)V/𝑁 +(𝜎)V relation, where 𝜎‡ is the uncorrelated white noise component, N is the number of measurements in the bin and 𝜎 is the red noise component. We find white and red noise dispersion in the range from 400 to 1000 and from 20 to 80 ppm, respectively. levels of correlated residual red noise, following the methodology of ref. 60 by 18 12 s s a m r i A 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 −0.2 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.4 ) x p ( t n e m e c a l p s i d n o i s r e p s i d − s s o r C ) x p ( t n e m e c a l p s i d n o i s r e p s i D 9 8 7 6 5 4 ) x p ( M H W F ) n i m / g e d ( d e e p S e l g n A n o i t a t o R 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet GRIS600B −2 −1 1 Time since mid−transit (hr) 0 −2 −1 1 Time since mid−transit (hr) 0 −2 −1 1 Time since mid−transit (hr) 0 −2 −1 1 Time since mid−transit (hr) 0 a) c) e) g) i) 2 2 2 2 GRIS600RI −2 −2 −2 −2 −1 Time since mid−transit (hr) 0 1 −1 Time since mid−transit (hr) 0 1 −1 Time since mid−transit (hr) 0 1 −1 Time since mid−transit (hr) 0 1 b) d) f) h) j) 2 2 2 2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 −0.1 −0.2 s s a m r i A ) x p ( t n e m e c a l p s i d n o i s r e p s i d − s s o r C ) x p ( t n e m e c a l p s i d n o i s r e p s i D 0.10 0.05 0.00 −0.05 −0.10 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 ) x p ( M H W F ) n i m / g e d ( d e e p S e l g n A n o i t a t o R −2 −1 1 Time since mid−transit (hr) 0 2 Extended Data Figure 4 Light curve auxiliary variables. Shown are air mass (a, b), drifts along the cross-dispersion (c, d) and dispersion axes (e, f), full width at half maximum (g, h) and the rate of change of the rotation angle (i, j) of the VLT FORS2 observations. Left and right columns refer to the GRIS600B and GRIS600RI observations, respectively. Extended Data Figure 4 Light curve auxiliary variables. Shown are air mass (a, b), drifts along the cross- dispersion (c, d) and dispersion axes (e, f), full width at half maximum (g, h) and the rate of change of the rotation angle (i, j) of the VLT FORS2 observations. Left and right columns refer to the GRIS600B and GRIS600RI observations, respectively. −2 −1 Time since mid−transit (hr) 1 0 2 13 19 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 The measured wavelength dependent relative radii and corresponding light curves are plotted in Figure 1 and Extended Data Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, Table 2 and comprise the transmission spectrum of WASP-96b. We used the overlapping wavelength region to combine the two observations together and computed the weighted mean of both datasets. We detect a marginally significant 1.4𝜎 7.2±5.2 × 10,'. This level of variation is consistent with the photometric of 𝜎<9.2 × 10,' (ref. 13). variability, associated with the active regions on the star surface with variability difference in the transit depths of the light curves from the two observations of clear, Burrows profile, χ2=65 clear, Allard profile, χ2=66 cloud deck, χ2=85 haze, χ2=92 Na Li K 4 2 0 t i l h g e H e a c S e r u s s e r P −2 −4 600B 600RI −6 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Wavelength (µm) measurements from grism 600B (blue dots) and 600RI (red dots) along with the 1𝜎 uncertainties, Extended Data Figure 5 Transmission spectrum of WASP-96b with indicated relative Extended Data Figure 5 Transmission spectrum of WASP-96b. Indicated are the relative radius radius measurements from grism 600B (blue dots) and 600RI (red dots) compared to the same set of models as in Figure 1. compared to the same set of models as in Figure 1. Modelling of the atmosphere of WASP-96b. 14 ) s R / p R ( o i t i a r s u d a r r a t t s − o − e n a P t l 0.120 0.118 0.116 0.114 0.112 0.110 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 First we compare the observed transmission spectrum to the models based on ref. 16, which included a self-consistent treatment of radiative transfer and chemical equilibrium of neutral and ionic species. Chemical mixing ratios and opacities were computed assuming solar metallicity and local chemical equilibrium, accounting for condensation and thermal ionization but not photoionization61-63. Transmission spectra were also calculated using 1D T-P profiles for the dayside, as well as an overall cooler planetary-averaged profile. In addition to the atmospheric models of a clear atmosphere, a simplified treatment of the scattering and absorption have been incorporated in those models to simulate the effect of small particle haze aerosols and large particle cloud condensates at optical and near-infrared wavelengths. In the case of haze, 20 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet cloud deck we included a wavelength-independent cross-section, which was a Rayleigh scattering opacity (𝜎 = 𝜎_(𝜆/𝜆_),') has been assumed with a cross- section which was 1,000× the cross-section of molecular hydrogen gas (𝜎_ = 5.31 × 10,V(cid:130)cmV at 𝜆_ = 3500Å; ref. 61). To include the effects of a flat factor of 100× the cross-section of molecular hydrogen gas at 𝜆_ = 3500Å; with a single parameter responsible for their vertical offset5,22,34. The 𝜒Vand BIC freedom for each model determined by 𝜈=𝑁−𝑚, where 𝑁 is the number of measurements and 𝑚 the number of free parameters in the fit. statistic quantities were computed for each model with the number of degrees of models within the wavelength bins and fitted these theoretical values to the data Similar to our previous studies, we obtained the average values of the (see Fig. 1). y t i s n e D m a r g o i t s H d e z i l a m r o N 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 log(Na/K) respectively. The solar value is indicated with the blue continuous line. Extended Data Figure 6 Na/K ratio Histogram of the marginalized posterior distribution of the Na to K ratio for WASP-96b. Shown are Extended Data Figure 6 Na/K ratio Histogram of the marginalized posterior distribution of the Na to K ratio for WASP-96b. Shown are the median and 1 sigma levels with orange continuous and dotted lines, respectively. The solar value is indicated with the blue continuous line. the median and 1𝜎 levels with orange continuous and dotted lines, line from 4500 to 6800 Å with cloud free atmosphere models, assuming two 26. We find no statistically significant difference between the two with 𝜒V=22 and 𝜒V=30 for 35 d.o.f. Further observations at higher signal to noise and individual shapes of the pressure broadened profile. The first profile had the shape detailed in ref. 3 and the second line shape from the formalism of ref. 18, We also compared the observed transmission spectrum around the Na D resolution will be necessary to distinguish between the two line-wing shapes. Retrieval analysis We performed a retrieval8,9,64 analysis using the 1D radiative-convective equilibrium ATMO model24,65-68. The code includes isotropic multi-gas Rayleigh scattering, H2-H2 and H2-He collision-induced absorption, as well as opacities for all major chemical species taken from the most up-to-date high-temperature 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 sources, including: H2, He, H2O, CO2, CO, CH4, Na, K, Li, Rb and Cs 66,69. Hazes and clouds are respectively treated as parameterized enhanced Rayleigh scattering and grey opacity70, which is similar to the approach of ref. 16 and is detailed in ref. 69. ATMO uses the correlated-k approximation with the random overlap method to compute the total gaseous mixture opacity, which has been shown to agree well with a full line-by-line treatment66. We first performed a free retrieval analysis, allowing a fit to the abundances of Na, K and Li, cloud and haze opacity, the planet's radius and atmospheric temperature. Na, K and Li were included as these elements are expected to add significant opacity in the wavelength region of our observations. We assumed that these gasses are well-mixed vertically in the atmosphere. 1000.0 100.0 10.0 1.0 0.1 r a t s Z / t e n a p Z l ⛢♆ WASP−39b HST+VLT ♄ WASP−96b VLT ♃ Constraining constituent: Na H2O CH4 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 Mass (× Jupiter) For all free parameters in our model we adopted uniform priors with the error bar represents the 1𝜎 uncertainty. The blue line indicates a fit to the Solar System gas giants (pale blue following ranges: 250−3000K for the temperature, 1−1.5𝑅B for the radius, 10,U_ to 10(cid:129) for the cloud and 10,U_ to 10(cid:129) for the haze opacity. For the between −2 and 12. Our retrieval analysis proceeded by first identifying the minimum 𝜒V solution using nonlinear least-squares optimization and then the Gelman-Rubin statistic for each free parameter was within 1% of unity, chains had found a 𝜒V below the median 𝜒V value of the chain. Finally, we Extended Data Figure 7 Heavy element enrichment of exoplanets relative to their stars as a function of Extended Data Figure 7 Heavy element enrichment of exoplanets relative to their stars mass. Plotted are the solar system planets (blue bars) and gas-giant exoplanets (grey and orange symbols). Each as a function of mass. The blue line indicates a fit to the solar system gas giants. symbols indicate Solar System planets). mixing ratios of chemical species other than H and He we adopted uniform priors marginalizing over the posterior distribution using differential-evolution Markov chain Monte Carlo71. A total of 12 chains for 30,000 steps each, were ran until showing that the chains were well-mixed and had reached a steady state. We discarded a burn-in phase from all chains corresponding to the step at which all 22 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet combined the remaining samples into a single chain, forming our posterior distributions. We summarize the results from the free retrieval in Figure 2. Elemental abundances of Na and Li were obtained for the host star from high-resolution optical spectroscopy with typical S/N of ∼100:1, as detailed in ref. 13. Because the potassium resonance doublet is located outside of the red limit of the high-resolution spectra, it was not possible to obtain abundance measurement. the limb with precise sodium abundance consistent with the solar value at ~1𝜎. measurement at ~0.73𝜇m shows a slightly larger radius, though it is only ~1.8𝜎 the solar value at the ~2𝜎 confidence (Figure 1 and 2). This most likely is a above our best-fit model. Our retrieval analysis shows a marginalized posterior distribution bounded only on the upper bound with median value consistent with The best-fitting retrieved spectrum suggests a cloud-free atmosphere at The spectrum shows no definitive evidence of the potassium feature. A consequence of the limited wavelength range, covering only ~2/3 of the potassium feature, as well as the diluting effect of the O2-A band, which partially covers this wavelength regime. The limited constraining power of the K feature allows for a three-case scenario for the abundance of K in the atmosphere of WASP-96b. In both cases the atmosphere of the planet is clear at the limb with sodium at solar abundance. In the first scenario, the abundance of potassium is sub-solar, leading to a missing potassium feature in the transmission spectrum. In chemical equilibrium, Na and K can form condensates (e.g Na2S and KCl) at temperatures lower that ~1300 and 1000 K, respectively. However, given that ~1300 to 1700 K this is unlikely. the retrieved temperature in the region probed by our observation lies between In the second scenario, the potassium can be ionized by the UV radiation of the host star, which would also lead to missing potassium line cores. The pressure-broadened line wings would still be present, because they would originate from deeper layers, where the UV radiation would be able to penetrate. We estimate the relative sodium-to-potassium ratio from our free retrieval analysis, finding highly uncertain value, which prevents definitive conclusion (Extended Data Figure 6). Future observations of multiple transits could help resolve the two-case scenario. A third scenario would require stratified atmosphere consisting of a low- altitude potassium layer followed by a cloud cover on top, above which is located a clear atmosphere consisting sodium at solar abundance. The sodium layer would need to be deep enough to allow for pressure-broadened line wings in the transmission spectrum. We note a large degeneracy between the aerosol clouds/hazes and the Na abundance, as higher cloud opacity levels can be fit with increased Na abundances. This degeneracy can be seen in the posterior distribution of the retrieval (see Extended Data Figure 8), and the marginalized posterior distributions are shown in Figure 2 (i.e. the distribution shown in Extended Data Figure 8 integrated along each axis). The degeneracy is accounted for in our retrieval modelling by marginalizing the Na abundance over the other fit model 23 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 parameters, which includes the effects of clouds and hazes. An aerosol-free model where the near-UV transmission spectra is dominated by H2 Rayleigh scattering helps determine the lower limit to the Na abundance. The upper limit for the Na abundance is sensitive to the line profile shape, as very high aerosol opacity levels probe significantly lower pressure levels, which affects the line profile. For example, for a clear atmosphere the transmission spectra at 4000 Å probes pressures of 20 mbar and is dominated by molecular hydrogen at that wavelength. In a model where the haze opacity is 1000x stronger than molecular hydrogen (the pink haze model shown in Figure 1), the pressure probed is ~1000x lower or ~0.02 mbar. These lower pressures affect the calculation of the pressure-broadened sodium line profile. As described in ref. 3, using semi- classical impact theory the half-width of the Lorentzian sodium line core is determined by the effective collision frequency, which itself is a product of the H2- perturber density (among other factors). We find that in the described scenario with very high sodium abundances and high cloud/haze opacities, very low pressures (such as 0.02 mbar) are probed and the sodium line profile becomes too narrow to be able to fit the wide profile as seen in the data, even at arbitrarily high abundances. Extended Data Figure 8 Posterior distribution of the retrieved cloud opacity versus the sodium abundance. VMR, vertical mixing ratio. The median and 1𝜎 measured parameters are indicated with continuous lines and the red dot marks the intercept for clarity. The colour scale shows the normalized density of the samples in the MCMS run. (cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1), (cid:6)(cid:1)(cid:1) (cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:1) (cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:6)(cid:9)(cid:10) We acknowledge that the 1D model does not account for horizontal advection which may affect the composition. This can break the chemical equilibrium conditions, leading to horizontally-constant non-equilibrium abundances of various species e.g., CH4 (ref. 72), which could potentially affect the observed transmission spectrum. However, an analysis of such effects is beyond the scope of the present letter. The presence of sodium and potassium in the atmospheric spectra of irradiated gas giant exoplanets has proved puzzling, with some of the spectra showing both or either of the two features without a clear trend with the planetary properties5. Primordial abundance variation along with atmospheric processes, such as condensation, photochemistry and photoionisation have been hypothesized to be responsible for the observed alkali variation. Elemental abundance constraints with ground-based instruments such as FORS2 could help 24 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet identify the role of some of those processes from statistically large samples of exoplanet spectra. relation of atmospheric metallicity with abundance of detected absorption features. Currently, such estimations have been obtained using the 1.4 µm water Exoplanet atmospheric metallicities have been estimated using scaling absorption feature. Recently, ref. 73 have obtained such measurement from a combined HST + VLT spectroscopy. We performed a retrieval analysis assuming chemical equilibrium in the atmosphere and determine the metallicity of WASP- 96b's atmosphere, finding consistency with the metallicity of the host star and the mass-metallicity trend established for solar system giant planets (Figure 3). We acknowledge that such estimations can largely be inaccurate due to the scaling metallicity assumption with elemental abundance and round-off the precision of the WASP-96b's metallicity to one significant figure. The current census of exoplanet metallicity measurements exhibits a large scatter across the full mass-metallicity diagram, which hampers definitive conclusion regarding a trend. Similar to ref. 74 we plot the relative planet to star heavy element enrichment as a function of the planet mass instead of the planet metallicity alone (Extended Data Figure 7). We convert 𝑍:/𝑍⨀ to 𝑍:/𝑍∗ assuming a scaling approximation with the parent star iron abundance of the form 𝑍:/𝑍∗=10[(cid:135)H/[], where 𝑍⨀=0.014 and propagate the uncertainty of [Fe/H]. It remains a future work to improve the statistics on the mass versus metallicity diagram with additional precise measurements. We therefore, consider it pre-mature to claim hypothetical trends or emerging patterns and relevant interpretation. Code availability. Publicly available custom codes were used for the Gaussian process modelling george (http://dfm.io/george/current/user/gp/) and emcee code (http://github.com/ dfm/emcee). The MCMC retrieval analyses were performed using the publicly available package exofast (http://astroutils.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/exofast). The ATMO code used to compute the atmosphere models is currently proprietary. We have opted not to make the customized IDL codes used to produce the spectra publicly available owing to their undocumented intricacies. Data availability. The data is within standard proprietary period of one year and will become publicly available on ESO archive (July and August) in 2018. Reduced data products and models used in this study are available Supplementary Information. 31. Appenzeller, I. et al. Successful commissioning of FORS1 - the first optical instrument on the VLT. Msngr. 94, 1-6 (1998). 32. Gibson, N. P. et al. VLT/FORS2 comparative transmission spectroscopy II: Confirmation of a cloud deck and Rayleigh scattering in WASP-31b, but no potassium? MNRAS, 467, 4591-4605 (2017). 33. Roeser, S. et al. The PPMXL catalogue of positions and proper motions on the ICRS. combining USNO-B1.0 and the two micron all sky survey (2MASS). AJ, 139, 2440-2447 (2010). 34. Nikolov, N. et al. Hubble Space Telescope hot Jupiter transmission spectral survey: a detection of Na and strong optical absorption in HAT-P-1b. MNRAS, 437, 46-66 (2014). 25 WASP-96b Nikolov et al. 2018 35. Gibson, N. P. et al. A Gaussian process framework for modelling instrumental systematics: application to transmission spectroscopy. MNRAS, 419, 2683- 2694 (2012). 36. Evans, T. M. et al. An ultrahot gas-giant exoplanet with a stratosphere. Natur. 548, 58-61 (2017). 37. Nikolov N. et al. Hubble PanCET: An isothermal day-side atmosphere for the bloated gas-giant HAT-P-32Ab. MNRAS 474, 1705-1717 (2018). 38. Ambikasaran, S. et al. Fast direct methods for Gaussian processes. ITPAM, 38, 252-265 (2015). 39. Foreman-Mackey, D. George: Gaussian process regression, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl.soft11015 (2015). 40. Foreman-Mackey, D. et al. emcee: The MCMC hammer. PASP, 125, 306-312 (2013). 41. Foreman-Mackey, D., corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python. Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 24 (2016). 42. Mandel, K. & Agol, E. Analytic lightcurves for planetary transit searches, Astrophys. J. 580, L171-175 (2002). 43. Magic, Z. et al. The Stagger-grid: A grid of 3D stellar atmosphere models. IV. Limb darkening coefficients. Astron. & Astrophys., 573, 90-100 (2015). 44. Claret, A. A new non-linear limb-darkening law for LTE stellar atmosphere models II K at several surface gravities. Geneva and Walraven systems: Calculations for -5.0<=log[M/H]<=+1 2000K<=Teff<=50,000 K at several surface gravities. Astron. & Astrophys. 401, 657-660 (2003). 45. Espinoza, N. & Jordan, A. Limb darkening and exoplanets: testing stellar model atmospheres and identifying biases in transit parameters. MNRAS, 450, 1879- 1899 (2015). 46. Espinoza, N. & Jordan, A. Limb darkening and exoplanets - II. Choosing the best law for optimal retrieval of transit parameters. MNRAS, 457, 3573-3581 (2016). 47. Markwardt, C. B. Non-linear least-squares fitting in IDL with MPFIT. ASPC, 411, 251-254 (2009). 48. Sedaghati, E. et al. Detection of titanium oxide in the atmosphere of a hot Jupiter. Natur. 549, 238-241 (2017). 49. Sedaghati, E. et al. Potassium detection in the clear atmosphere of a hot-Jupiter. FORS2 transmission spectroscopy of WASP-17b. Astron. Astrophys., 596, 47- 61 (2016). 50. Lendl, M. FORS2 observes a multi-epoch transmission spectrum of the hot Saturn-mass exoplanet WASP-49b. Astron. Astrophys. 587, 67-81 (2016). 51. Southworth, J. Homogeneous studies of transiting extrasolar planets - I. Light- curve analyses. MNRAS, 386, 1644-1666 (2008). 52. Mallonn, M. et al. Transmission spectroscopy of the inflated exo-Saturn HAT-P- 19b. Astron Astrophys, 580, 60-71 (2015). 53. Stevenson, K. B. A Search for water in the atmosphere of HAT-P-26b using LDSS-3C. Astrophys. J., 817, 141-151 (2016). 54. Nikolov, N. et al. HST hot-Jupiter transmission spectral survey: haze in the atmosphere of WASP-6b. MNRAS, 447, 463-478 (2015). 55. Rackham, B. et al. ACCESS I: An optical transmission spectrum of GJ 1214b reveals a heterogeneous stellar photosphere. Astrophys. J., 834, 151-172 (2017). 56. Huitson, C. M. Gemini/GMOS transmission spectral survey: complete optical transmission spectrum of the hot Jupiter WASP-4b. Astron J., 154, 95-113 (2017). 26 An absolute sodium abundance for a cloud-free 'hot Saturn' exoplanet 57. Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification. ITAC, 19, 716-723 (1974). 58. Gibson, N. P. Reliable inference of exoplanet light-curve parameters using deterministic and stochastic systematics models. MNRAS, 445, 3401-3414 (2014). 59. Schwarz, G. Estimating the dimension of a model. AnSta, 6, 461-464 (1978). 60. Pont, F. et al. The effect of red noise on planetary transit detection. MNRAS, 373, 231-242 (2006). 61. Lodders, K., Alkali element chemistry in cool dwarf atmospheres. Astrophys J., 519, 793-801 (1999). 62. Lodders, K. & Fegley, B. Atmospheric chemistry in giant planets, brown dwarfs, and low-mass dwarf stars. i. carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. Icar. 155, 393-424 (2002). 63. Freedman, R. S. et al. Line and mean opacities for ultracool dwarfs and extrasolar planets. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 174, 504-513 (2008). 64. Madhusudhan, N. & Seager, S. A temperature and abundance retrieval method for exoplanet atmospheres. Astrophys. J. 707, 24-39 (2009). 65. Amundsen, D. S. et al. Accuracy tests of radiation schemes used in hot Jupiter global circulation models. Astron. Astrophys., 564, 59-75 (2014). 66. Amundsen, D. S. et al. Treatment of overlapping gaseous absorption with the correlated-k method in hot Jupiter and brown dwarf atmosphere models. Astron. Astrophys., 598, 97-107 (2017). 67. Tremblin, P. et al. Advection of potential temperature in the atmosphere of irradiated exoplanets: a robust mechanism to explain radius inflation. Astrophys. J., 841, 30-38 (2017). 68. Drummond, B. The effects of consistent chemical kinetics calculations on the pressure-temperature profiles and emission spectra of hot Jupiters. Astron. Astrophys., 594, 69-84 (2016). 69. Goyal, J. M. A library of ATMO forward model transmission spectra for hot Jupiter exoplanets. MNRAS, 474, 5158-5185 (2017). 70. Lecavelier des Etangs, A. et al. Rayleigh scattering in the transit spectrum of HD 189733b. Astron. Astrophys. 481, L83–L86 (2008). 71. Eastman, J., Gaudi, B. S. & Agol, E. EXOFAST: a fast-exoplanetary fitting suite in IDL. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 125, 83–112 (2013). 72. Drummond, B. et al. Observable signatures of wind-driven chemistry with a fully consistent three-dimensional radiative hydrodynamics model of HD 209458b. Astrophys. J. Let. (in rev.). 73. Wakeford, H. et al. The Complete transmission spectrum of WASP-39b with a precise water constraint. Astron. J., 155, 29-43 (2018). 74. Thorngren, Daniel P. et al. The mass-metallicity relation for giant planets. Astrop. J., 831, 64-78, (2016). 27
1005.1633	2	1005	2010-05-22T03:56:53	Observations of Mass Loss from the Transiting Exoplanet HD 209458b	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	Using the new Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) on the {\it Hubble Space Telescope (HST)}, we obtained moderate-resolution, high signal/noise ultraviolet spectra of HD 209458 and its exoplanet HD 209458b during transit, both orbital quadratures, and secondary eclipse. We compare transit spectra with spectra obtained at non-transit phases to identify spectral features due to the exoplanet's expanding atmosphere. We find that the mean flux decreased by $7.8\pm 1.3$% for the C II 1334.5323\AA\ and 1335.6854\AA\ lines and by $8.2\pm 1.4$% for the Si III 1206.500\AA\ line during transit compared to non-transit times in the velocity interval --50 to +50 km s$^{-1}$. Comparison of the C II and Si III line depths and transit/non-transit line ratios shows deeper absorption features near --10 and +15 km s$^{-1}$ and less certain features near --40 and +30--70 km s$^{-1}$, but future observations are needed to verify this first detection of velocity structure in the expanding atmosphere of an exoplanet. Our results for the C II lines and the non-detection of Si IV 1394.76\AA\ absorption are in agreement with \citet{Vidal-Madjar2004}, but we find absorption during transit in the Si III line contrary to the earlier result. The $8\pm 1$% obscuration of the star during transit is far larger than the 1.5% obscuration by the exoplanet's disk. Absorption during transit at velocities between --50 and +50 km s$^{-1}$ in the C II and Si III lines requires high-velocity ion absorbers, but models that assume that the absorbers are high-temperature thermal ions are inconsistent with the COS spectra. Assuming hydrodynamic model values for the gas temperature and outflow velocity at the limb of the outflow as seen in the C II lines, we find mass-loss rates in the range (8--40)$\times 10^{10}$ g s$^{-1}$.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft November 8, 2018 OBSERVATIONS OF MASS LOSS FROM THE TRANSITING EXOPLANET HD 209458b 1 Jeffrey L. Linsky JILA, University of Colorado and NIST, 440 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0440 [email protected] Hao Yang JILA, University of Colorado and NIST, 440 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0440 [email protected] Kevin France CASA, University of Colorado, 593 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0593 [email protected] Cynthia S. Froning CASA, University of Colorado, 593 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0593 [email protected] James C. Green CASA, University of Colorado, 593 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0593 [email protected] John T. Stocke CASA, University of Colorado, 593 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0593 [email protected] Steven N. Osterman CASA, University of Colorado, 593 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0593 -- 2 -- [email protected] ABSTRACT Using the new Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), we obtained moderate-resolution, high signal/noise ultraviolet spectra of HD 209458 and its exoplanet HD 209458b during transit, both orbital quadra- tures, and secondary eclipse. We compare transit spectra with spectra obtained at non-transit phases to identify spectral features due to the exoplanet's expand- ing atmosphere. We find that the mean flux decreased by 7.8± 1.3% for the C II 1334.5323 A and 1335.6854 A lines and by 8.2 ± 1.4% for the Si III 1206.500 A line during transit compared to non-transit times in the velocity interval -- 50 to +50 km s−1. Comparison of the C II and Si III line depths and transit/non- transit line ratios shows deeper absorption features near -- 10 and +15 km s−1 and less certain features near -- 40 and +30 -- 70 km s−1, but future observations are needed to verify this first detection of velocity structure in the expanding atmosphere of an exoplanet. Our results for the C II lines and the non-detection of Si IV 1394.76 A absorption are in agreement with Vidal-Madjar et al. (2004), but we find absorption during transit in the Si III line contrary to the earlier result. The 8 ± 1% obscuration of the star during transit is far larger than the 1.5% obscuration by the exoplanet's disk. Absorption during transit at velocities between -- 50 and +50 km s−1 in the C II and Si III lines requires high-velocity ion absorbers. Assuming hydrodynamic model values for the gas temperature and outflow velocity at the limb of the outflow as seen in the C II lines, we find mass-loss rates in the range (8 -- 40)×1010 g s−1. These rates assume that the carbon abundance is solar, which is not the case for the giant planets in the solar system. Our mass-loss rate estimate is consistent with theoretical hydrodynamic models that include metals in the outflowing gas. Subject headings: planets and satellites: atmospheres -- planets and satellites: individual (HD 209458b) -- planets and satellites: physical evolution -- stars: individual (HD 209458) -- ultraviolet: stars 1Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained from the Data Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute. STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. These observations are associated with the HST GTO program #11534. -- 3 -- 1. INTRODUCTION Mazeh et al. (2000) monitored the radial velocities of the G0 V star HD 209458 to de- rive the orbital parameters and minimum mass of its transiting planet HD 209458b. Very shortly thereafter, accurate measurements of the mass and radius of HD 209458b were ex- tracted from radial velocity and photometric transit observations by Henry et al. (2000) and Charbonneau et al. (2000). Table 1 lists the presently accepted properties of HD 209458 and HD 209458b cited by Knutson et al. (2007). HD 209458b is likely the best-studied Jupiter- like exoplanet located very close to its host star. As a result of its proximity, HD 209458b receives very strong incident radiation (see estimate in Table 1) and stellar wind flux from its host star. HD 209458b is the first transiting planet for which atmospheric absorption was observed in the resonance lines of Na I (Charbonneau et al. 2002) and subsequently in lines of H I, C II, O I, and others. Using the G140M grating of Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) on the Hubble Space Telescope HST with its resolution of ∼ 30 km s−1, Vidal-Madjar et al. (2003) found that the Lyman-α line flux was reduced by 15 ± 4% during transit at velocities between -- 130 and +100 km s−1. Based on this first detection of H I absorption at or above the planet's Roche lobe, they concluded that hydrogen is escaping from the planet. Vidal-Madjar et al. (2004) then used the low-resolution G140L grating of STIS to detect an absorption depth at midtransit of 5 ± 2% for the unresolved Lyman-α line, 13 ± 4.5% for the O I 1304 A multiplet, and 7.5 ± 3.5% for the C II 1335 A doublet. Their detection of absorption in the O I and C II lines at or above the Roche lobe confirmed significant mass loss from the planet by hydrodynamic outflow. They argued that reduction in the Lyman- α line flux at ≈ 100 km s−1 from line center indicates high velocities of neutral hydrogen atoms. Additionally, more absorption on the blue side of the Lyman-α emission line than the red side indicates outflow towards the observer and away from the planet. A subsequent observation of HD 209458 using the HST Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) showed a reduction in the unresolved Lyman-α line flux of (8.0 ± 5.7)% during transits, consistent with the STIS G140L and G140M results, thereby confirming mass loss from the planet's large exosphere (Ehrenreich et al. 2008). There have been a number of reanalyses of the data and futher discussions of the STIS transit G140M observations by Ben-Jaffel (2007), Ben-Jaffel (2008), Vidal-Madjar et al. (2008) and others. There is a consensus that HD 209458b has an extended exosphere and is losing mass, but important details are not yet understood. Such questions as: whether the exosphere size is larger or smaller than the projected Roche lobe, what are the outflow speed and mass-loss rate, and whether or not the mass loss from the planet produces a cometlike tail are not yet answered with the existing STIS and ACS observations. While -- 4 -- the STIS G140M Lyman-α spectrum obtained by Vidal-Madjar et al. (2003) provides some velocity information, higher spectral resolution and signal/noise (S/N) are needed to obtain the velocity structure and optical depth of the outflowing gas in Lyman-α and other spectral lines. The large abundance of hydrogen and large flux in the Lyman-α line make this line a prime candidate for studying exoplanet outflows, but there are uncertainties (many of them unique) in measuring the exoplanet's mass-loss rate only from this line. These include the modest S/N of the existing STIS G140M grating data, possible variability of the stellar Lyman-α profile at the time of transit that cannot be directly measured, broad interstellar absorption in the core of the line that prevents measurements of low velocity absorption during transit, and the time-varying geocoronal and interplanetary emission in the line core that cannot be completely corrected for. Absorption of Lyman-α photons during transit over the velocity range -- 130 to +100 km s−1 raises the question of the origin of the high-velocity hydrogen that is difficult to ex- plain by a thermal plasma at moderate temperature. Holmstrom et al. (2008) proposed that the high-velocity neutral hydrogen can be produced by charge exchange between stellar wind protons and neutral hydrogen in the planet's outflow. Such energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) are seen in the solar system and likely occur where the stellar and planetary winds interact between HD 209458b and its host star. If this were the only possible explanation, then the Lyman-α profile during transit provides useful information on the stellar wind but ambiguous information on mass loss from the planet (Holmstrom et al. 2008; Murray-Clay et al. 2009). However, Lecavelier des Etangs et al. (2008b) argued that the observed Lyman-α profile and the high-velocity hydrogen atoms can be simply explained by stellar radiation pressure and the ENA explanation required a peculiar stellar wind model. The Lyman-α transit observations by Vidal-Madjar et al. (2003, 2004) stimulated a number of interpretive papers concerning the mechanisms for mass loss and lifetime of a Jupiter-like planet close to its host star [e.g., Vidal-Madjar et al. (2003); Baraffe et al. (2004); Koskinen et al. (2007); Holmstrom et al. (2008); Koskinen et al. (2010)] and hy- drodynamic models [e.g., Lammer et al. (2003); Lecavelier des Etangs et al. (2004); Yelle (2004); Jaritz et al. (2005); Tian et al. (2005); Garcia Munoz (2007); Schneiter et al. (2007); Murray-Clay et al. (2009)]. As discussed below, the theoretical models differ in their treat- ment of the amount of available radiative energy input (photoionization and otherwise) to drive the hyrdodynamic blow-off, the location of the heating, the presence of metals in the outflow, and the relative amount of cooling by expansion, thermal conduction, and radiation. These models predict very different mass-loss rates. Which of these models are consistent with the spectrally resolved metal lines observed during transit? -- 5 -- With the objectives of measuring an accurate mass-loss rate from the planet and testing different physical models for the mass loss, one needs far better data, which requires a new scientific instrument. One needs higher S/N spectra with higher spectral resolution and sufficient sensitivity to study many spectral lines formed in the extended atmosphere and wind of the exoplanet. In particular, it is important to use spectral lines other than Lyman-α to avoid unique difficulties in the analysis of this line. As we describe below, the new Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) on HST is well designed for this task. 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION Installed on the HST during Servicing Mission 4 in 2009 May, COS is a high-throughput ultraviolet (UV) spectrograph optimized for point sources. Descriptions of the on-orbit performance characteristics of COS will be presented by Green et al. (2010, in preparation) and Osterman et al. (2010, in preparation). During GTO Program 11534, we observed HD 209458 with both the G130M and G160M gratings of the COS far-UV channel to obtain moderate-resolution spectra covering the 1140 -- 1790 A spectral region. In this paper, we analyze the spectra obtained with the G130M grating, which includes the spectral range 1140 -- 1450 A. The G160M observations are presented by France et al. (2010). The COS line- spread function (LSF) in the far-UV is not a simple Gaussian, but it can be approximated by a Gaussian with a resolution of 17,000-18,000 (16.7-17.6 km s−1) with extended wings (Ghavamian et al. 2010). We have tested for the effects of the extended wings by comparing the C II 1335.6854 A emission line of α Cen A (G2 V) observed with the STIS E140H grating (3 km s−1 resolution) convolved with a Gaussian (17 km s−1 resolution) and with the COS LSF. In the line wings at 50 -- 70 km s−1, the Gaussian broadens the profile by less than 1 km s−1, but the COS LSF broadens the profile by 2 -- 6 km s−1. Since both the transit and non-transit line profiles are broadened in the same way, their ratio is not changed by the broad wings of the COS LSF. The broadening of the intrinsic spectral lines by the COS LSF (compared to the Gaussian profile) is less than 1/3 of the spectral resolution element and thus not significant. Table 2 summarizes the individual G130M exposures obtained at transit (near orbital phase 0.00), first quadrature (phase 0.25), secondary eclipse (phase 0.50), and second quadra- ture (phase 0.75). The total exposure times for these phases are 4946.8 s, 7941.7 s, 4956.7 s, and 7796.0 s, respectively. The orbital phases listed in Table 2 are computed using the ephemeris of Knutson et al. (2007). Transit occurs between orbital phases 0.982 and 0.018 (Wittenmyer et al. 2005) as indicated by the optical light curve. Since the duration of transit is about 3.22 hours, HST could observe HD 209458 during the same transit on two sequential -- 6 -- spacecraft orbits. The S/N in the COS spectra can be lower than predicted by photon statistics as a result of two instrumental effects. The hex pattern formed at the intersection of the microchannel plate pores imposes a ±4% pattern on the spectral signal, and shadows of the wire grid on the detector decrease the signal as much as 20% at certain locations on the detector faceplate. We checked the locations of the known wire grid shadows and found that the spectra of the C II, Si III, and Si IV lines studied in this paper are not affected by the wire grids. Both effects, which are fixed at the detector, were mitigated by moving the grating and the resultant spectrum to different positions on the detector. In this program, we observed at four different grating offset positions identified by the beginning and ending wavelengths of the gap between the two detector faceplate elements listed in the last column of Table 2. In principle, division of a transit spectrum by an non-transit spectrum at the same grating position should cancel the signal errors introduced by both instrumental effects to show the true spectral difference produced by the planet in front of the star. In practice, the cancellation will not be perfect because of possible time variations in the stellar spectrum and grating mechanisms that do not return to the same position every time. The grating mechanism positioning errors are not fully understood at this time. We found that the wavelength solutions for spectra observed at different grating offset positions are not identical and could be off by 1 -- 2 pixels. We registered each observed spectrum with others at the same grating setting by cross-correlating the interstellar feature in the C II 1334.5323 A line. These registrations typically involved displacements by only 1 -- 2 pixels, far less than a resolution element with no significant degradation in the spectral resolution. We then co-added the summed spectra for the four grating offset positions using the same cross- correlation technique. Also, within 500 pixels of the end of each detector segment (about 5 A for G130M), there are additional instrumental artifacts in the spectrum. For this reason, we did not analyze portions of the spectrum near the ends of a detector faceplate. The data were processed with the COS calibration pipeline, CALCOS2 v2.11b (2009-09-08) and combined with a custom IDL coaddition procedure. Figure 1 shows a portion of the G130M spectra obtained during transit and all non- transit phases (secondary eclipse and both quadratures). The spectra are very similar, but there are subtle differences that provide information on the exoplanet's atmosphere and mass-loss rate. In this paper, we compare transit and non-transit spectra of lines of C II, Si III, and Si IV. The H I Lyman-α line cannot be analyzed because geocoronal emission through the large aperture of COS completely dominates any stellar componant. The O I 2We refer the reader to the cycle 18 COS Instrument Handbook for more details: http://www.stsci.edu/hst/cos/documents/handbooks/current/cos cover.html. -- 7 -- lines at 1302, 1304, and 1306 A were also not analyzed because time-varying geocoronal emission in these lines renders comparison of transit and non-transit spectra uncertain and because the lines were located close to the end of a detector faceplate. 3. RESULTS 3.1. Si IV Line A critical question is whether the emission line fluxes of the host star were significantly different at the times when the transit and non-transit spectra were obtained, since late-type stars like the Sun often show time-variable emission in lines formed in their outer atmospheres (e.g., Rottman 2006). Figure 2 shows the co-added transit and non-transit spectra for the Si IV resonance line (1393.76 A). Since the Si IV line is formed in highly ionized gas which is not likely to be in the atmosphere or extended wind of the exoplanet, the very similar Si IV fluxes during times of transit and non-transit indictate that the average flux in the stellar emission lines during our observations was nearly constant. The difference spectrum panel in Figure 2 confirms that the transit and non-transit spectra of the Si IV line are identical to within the noise level. To make the comparison of the transit and non-transit Si IV line profiles more quantita- tive, we compute the mean transit/non-transit flux ratio over the velocity range -- 50 to +50 km s−1. Beyond this velocity range, the fluxes are less than 15% of the peak flux, and the S/N in each spectral resolution element is small. For the 100 km s−1 wide velocity interval centered on 0 km s−1, the mean flux ratio is 0.998. To estimate the error in the mean flux ratio, we have computed flux ratios for many velocity intervals contained within the -- 50 to +50 km s−1 velocity range that are between 60 and 95 km s−1 wide. The dispersion of these flux ratios indicates that the standard deviation in the mean flux ratio for the -- 50 to +50 km s−1 velocity range is ±0.014. We therefore conclude that the mean stellar fluxes in the other emission lines were the same during transit and non-transit times, and do not rescale the transit and non-transit fluxes. At positive velocities, there are regions where the transit/non-transit ratio may differ from unity at or above one standard deviation. We discuss this in Section 3.4. 3.2. C II Lines The C II lines at 1334.5323 A and 1335.6854 A are bright emission lines formed in the chromospheres of solar-type stars like HD 209458. On October 2, 2009, we observed the C II -- 8 -- lines during transit with the G130M grating at four grating positions specified by the gap wavelengths listed in Table 2. For each of these grating positions, there are corresponding observations at both quadratures and a secondary eclipse obtained at different times. Figure 3 shows the co-added spectra of the C II 1334.5323 A resonance line and the C II 1335.6854 A line. The spectra were smoothed with a 5-pixel boxcar, which is somewhat smaller than the on-orbit G130M spectral resolution element of 7 -- 8 pixels. The transit and non-transit spectra are plotted separately and ratioed. The deep minimum observed in the C II 1334.5323 A line at -- 6.60 km s−1 (heliocentric) is interstellar absorption due to the Eri cloud located within 3.5 pc of the Sun (Redfield & Linsky 2008). Since the radial velocity of HD 209458 is -- 14.8 km s−1, the -- 6.6 km s−1 interstellar absorption is centered to the red of the centroid of the stellar emission line. Both C II lines show less flux during transit than non-transit times, although there are small velocity intervals where the transit/non-transit ratio exceeds unity. To test whether the ratios in these velocity intervals are real or noise, we have co-added the profiles of the two C II lines (including the portion of the 1334 A line with interstellar absorption) to get transit and non-transit profiles with twice the signal and higher S/N. The co-added C II profiles are included in Figure 3, together with difference and ratio profiles for each C II line and the co-added line. The co-added C II line shows absorption during transit at all velocities between -- 50 and +50 km s−1, except at zero velocity. The deep absorption features for the co-added C II line are interesting and will be discussed in Section 3.4. Using the same method that we used for the Si IV line, we find that the mean flux ratio in the -- 50 to +50 km s−1 velocity interval is 0.924 ± 0.022 for the C II 1334.53 A line and 0.921 ± 0.015 for the C II 1335.69 A line. For the co-added C II line, the mean flux ratio is 0.922 ± 0.013. 3.3. Si III Line Figure 2 shows the co-added transit and non-transit spectra for the Si III resonance line at 1206.500 A. The difference and ratio spectra show absorption at all velocities between -60 and +60 km s−1. There are also deep absorption features which we will discuss in Section 3.4. Using the same method that we used in analyzing the Si IV and C II lines, we find that the mean flux ratio in the -- 50 to +50 km s−1 band is 0.918 ± 0.014, the same within errors as previously seen for the C II lines. Our result for the mean absorption depth during transit of 8.2 ± 1.4% is very different from the non-detection absorption depth of 0.0+2.2 −0.0% -- 9 -- obtained by Vidal-Madjar et al. (2004) from the STIS G140L spectrum and confirmed by Ben-Jaffel & Sona Hosseini (2010). We suspect that the difference between our detection of Si III absorption during transit and the previous non-detection is due to time variability. Charge transfer between protons and Si+ ions leads to a substantially higher abundance of Si++ than is the case for collisional ionization equilibrium. Baliunas & Butler (1980) found that Si++ is the dominant ionization stage in coronal plasmas at temperatures above 20,000 K and is important at 15,000 K. Thus, we are not surprized to see a substantial amount of Si++ at the limb of the exoplanet's outflow where protons from the solar wind and planetary escape are present to ionize Si+, but the amount of Si++ could vary appreciably with changes in the stellar wind, planetary mass-loss rate, and temperature of the gas escaping from the planet's exosphere. 3.4. Is There Velocity Structure in the Planet's Mass Loss? Until now we have discussed the mean transit/non-transit flux ratios for the entire line cores between -- 50 and +50 km s−1, but there are indications of departures from these mean ratios which indicate that the absorption in the planet's mass loss depends on velocity. To test this idea, we compare in Figure 4 the difference and ratio profiles for the Si III and co-added C II lines. We find deep absorption features near -- 10 and +15 km s−1 in both lines that are larger than the indicated errors shown in Figures 2 and 3. Since the C II and Si III lines are likely formed in the same region of the exosphere, we include in Figure 4 the co-addition of the two profiles with typical error bars for comparison with theoretical models. The increase in S/N with the co-addition of the C II and Si III spectra allows us to make more definitive statements about the velocity structure. The dips near -- 10 and +15 km s−1 are more than twice as large as the errors per spectral resolution element (about 17 km s−1) and are most likely real. In addition, the ratios near -- 40 and +30 -- 70 km s−1 are also low, but the line fluxes decrease rapidly away from line center and these low ratios are less certain. Future observations with higher S/N are needed to confirm this first detection of velocity structure in the expanding atmosphere of an exoplanet. We also note that there are absorption features near +20 and +40 km s−1 in the transit/non-transit ratio for the Si IV line which are greater than the noise level. Future observations are also needed to test the reality of these features. -- 10 -- 3.5. Does HD 209458b have a Comet-like Tail? Schneider et al. (1998) proposed that giant exoplanets located close to their host star will have comet-like tails of ionized gas produced by the interaction of the stellar wind and ions excaping from the planet's exosphere, and that these tails could produce absorption when observed in front of the star. Vidal-Madjar et al. (2003) then predicted that stellar Lyman-α radiation pressure on hydrogen atoms escaping from the planet's exosphere would form a comet-like tail trailing the planet. The presence of gas in an extended tail should produce more absorption at and beyond egress than during ingress phases. Schneiter et al. (2007) calculated possible cometary wakes and the time evolution of Lyman-α absorption from ingress to beyond egress. We searched our C II and Si III spectra for line profile differences between the ingress and egress phases to see whether these ions could be present in significant amounts in a tail, but we found no differences larger than the noise level. Future observations with higher S/N are required to verify the predictions of comet-like tails. 4. MASS-LOSS RATE IN A THERMAL PLASMA OUTFLOW The ≈ 8 ± 1% obscuration of the star in the C II and Si III lines during transit far exceeds the 1.5% obscuration by the exoplanet's disk, indicating absorption by an extended atmosphere or mass loss that is optically thick in the C II and Si III lines. Our result for the C II lines is consistent with the 7.5+3.6 −3.4% absorption depth that Vidal-Madjar et al. (2004) obtained for the unresolved C II lines, but very different from the absorption depth of 0.0+2.2 −0.0% for the Si IV line is consistent with our result. −0.0% that they obtained for the Si III line. Their absorption depth of 0.0+6.5 Since the size of the obscuring material (optically thick in these lines) is similar to the size of the exoplanet's Roche lobe (Ben-Jaffel & Sona Hosseini 2010), one possible explanation for the transit data is that the Roche lobe is filled by mass loss from the planet. Another possible explanation is that the exoplanet's escaping gas forms an extended cometary tail blown out by the stellar wind, as suggested by hydrodynamical simulations (Schneiter et al. 2007). We estimate the mass-loss rate from the planet's atmosphere by assuming that the outflow forms a spherically symmetric envelope around the planet which is optically thick in the C II resonance line covering about 8% of the stellar surface. The spherical symmetry assumption is a good approximation because the shape of the tidally induced Roche lobe as seen during transit is close to a sphere (Lecavelier des Etangs et al. 2004). The envelope becomes optically thin at its "limb" because gas expansion and mass flux conservation reduce -- 11 -- the gas density with increasing radial distance (r) from the planet. We define the envelope "limb" to be at the radial distance from the planet for which the absorption area is the same as that of an opaque sphere of the same size. We consider a line of sight from the star that passes through the envelope with p the point of closest approach to the planet. The quantity x measures the distance along this line of sight from point p back to the star. The optical depth to the observer in the C II resonance line along this line of sight at the apparent limb of the envelope is, τ (p, ∆ν) = 2kZ ∞ 0 nC II(x)dx = 0.69, (1) √πe2 mc f ∆νD lines of sight passing outside of p, R ∞ where nC II is the number density of C+ ions, k = is the line opacity, f = 0.128 is the oscillator strength, m is the electron mass, and ∆νD is the Doppler width. The value of p depends somewhat on the displacement from line center, ∆ν, because for expanding gas, most of the absorption occurs near the frequency corresponding to the line-of-sight component of the expansion velocity. The limb occurs at τ = 0.69, where as much stellar flux is transmitted through the envelope for lines of sight passing inside of p as for those e−tdt, where t is the optical depth through the envelope for lines of sight with different values of p. Since the gas density and thus optical depth increase along lines of sight inside of p, the limb will occur at somewhat smaller optical depths depending on details the density and outflow velocity. For example, Lecavelier des Etangs et al. (2008a) calculated τ = 0.56 for an atmosphere in hydrostatic equilibrium, which has a density that decreases exponentially outward but does not have an outflow or heating in the outer layers. If the density decreases with radial position according to a power law, then τ could be smaller than 0.69 by a factor of 2 or 3. The resulting mass loss rates would also be smaller by this factor. We call attention to this uncertainty that should be with resolved by realistic models based on physical principles that predict transit line profiles consistent with the COS data. 0.69 e−tdt = R 0.69 0 Since the gas density decreases with increasing radial distance from the planet r (thus increasing x along the line of sight), p should decrease slightly with increasing ∆ν. We compute ∆νD = 2.7 × 1010 s−1, assuming a gas temperature of 10,000 K (Garcia Munoz 2007; Ballester et al. 2007). If the outflow is turbulent or some absorbers have superthermal velocities (see below), then ∆νD will be larger. For a spherical outflow with constant mass flux, the mass flux of C+ ions from the planet is MC II = 4πr2mCvnC II(r), (2) -- 12 -- where v is the outflow speed at r, mC is the mass of a carbon atom, and r2 = x2 + p2. We estimate MC II by requiring that the gas in the exosphere obscure 8% of the stellar disk within ∆νD of line center, corresponding to ±3.7 km s−1. This condition will occur when the optical depth is about 0.69 at p2 = 0.08R2 ⋆, i.e., τ (p = 0.284R⋆, ∆ν) = 2√πe2f MC II mc∆νD4πmCv Z ∞ 0 dx r2 = 0.69. The integral has an analytical solution by setting u = x/p of Z ∞ 0 dx r2 = 1 p Z ∞ 0 du u2 + 1 = π 2p . (3) (4) We adopt v = 10 km s−1 at p = 0.284R⋆ = 2.36Rplanet from the theoretical models of Tian et al. (2005), Garcia Munoz (2007), and Murray-Clay et al. (2009). We then find that MC II = 2.1 × 107g s−1 = 6.8 × 1014g yr−1. (5) In his model for the exosphere of HD 209458b, Garcia Munoz (2007) found that essentially all of the carbon is singly ionized. If we assume that the carbon abundance is solar, 2.7 × 10−4 that of hydrogen (Asplund et al. 2009), the total mass-loss rate from the planet for only thermal broadening of the C II lines is Mtotal = 8.0 × 1010g s−1 = 2.4 × 1018g yr−1. (6) Since the planet's mass is 1.2 × 1030 g (Knutson et al. 2007), the fractional mass-loss rate per year is very small, as shown by Mtotal Mplanet = 2.0 × 10−12yr−1. (7) This calculation assumes that the mass-loss rate and planetary orbit do not change with time. Since additional line broadening is required to explain the broad absorption in the MCII and Mtotal are at the lower end of their realistic ranges (see C II lines, these values of Section 5). -- 13 -- 5. DISCUSSION We now compare our empirical mass-loss rate with those of various theoretical models. All theoretical models of which we are aware assume hydrodynamical outflow driven by high temperatures and pressures near the base of the outflow. The important questions are the amount and location of energy absorbed from the star, the important cooling mechanisms, and the location of the sonic point in these transonic (Parker-like) winds relative to the location of the exoplanet's Roche lobe. Vidal-Madjar et al. (2003) demonstrated that neu- tral hydrogen must be escaping from a volume larger than the planet's Roche lobe by an unspecified mass-loss mechanism and that stellar radiation pressure further accelerates the M > 1010 outflow and shapes a comet-like tail. They proposed that the mass-loss rate is g s−1, but they added that "owing to saturation effects in the [Lyman-α] absorption line, a flux larger by several orders of magnitude would produce a similar absorption signature." Murray-Clay et al. (2009) computed models with and without radiation pressure and con- M, but it can change the location of the cluded that radiation pressure does not increase mass loss from the day side to the night side of the exoplanet. Tidal forces also do not change M appreciably, but they move the sonic point closer to the exoplanet and increase the flow velocity (Garcia Munoz 2007; Murray-Clay et al. 2009). All of the theoretical models assume that HD 209458 is a main sequence star like the Sun with ultraviolet and extreme ultraviolet radiative output similar to the Sun at low or high activity. Since mass-loss rates are proportional to the energy input (the so-called energy- In all of the models, limited escape rate), the critical question is the energy input rate. expansion (PdV work) is the dominant cooling mechanism, although radiation by H+ 3 at the base of the flow must be included (Yelle 2004), and radiation in the Lyman-α line can be important for T Tauri star radiative input rates. Many models assume that only the energy remaining after stellar Lyman continuum (E> 13.6 eV) photons ionize neutral hydrogen is available to energize the outflow, so that the assumed fraction of this radiation (83% or 100% M is a few times 1010 g s−1. For in different models) controls the outflow. For such models, M = 4.7 × 1010, Tian et al. (2005) example, Yelle (2004), as corrected in Yelle (2006), finds M = 6.1 × 1010 for EUV flux similar to the find M < 6 × 1010, Garcia Munoz (2007) finds M = 1.5 × 1011 for EUV flux like the active Sun. Murray-Clay et al. low activity Sun but (2009) find that M ∼ 2 × 1010 g s−1. The inclusion of atoms and molecules other than H, H+, and H2 can significantly change the outflow, in particular by increasing the mass-loss rate, because more of the stellar UV radiation is available to heat the outflow and drive the mass loss. For example, the Lyman- α line contains more flux than the entire Lyman continuum (Ribas et al. 2005), and other UV emission lines and continuum radiation in the wavelength range 912 -- 2000 A can be -- 14 -- absorbed in the bound-free continua of atomic species (e.g., CNO) and molecules including M increased H2. When Garcia Munoz (2007) added solar abundances of CNO to his models, by a factor of 4.5 (see his Table 6). Including partial absorption of the 1000 -- 2000 A stellar M to 6.3 × 1011 g s−1. Metals flux by atoms and molecules with solar abundances increases must exist in the distant outflow since we see absorption during transit in the C II and Si III lines. By equating the energy input of both Lyman continuum and Lyman-α with stellar fluxes estimated from the rotation rate of HD 209458, Lecavelier des Etangs (2007) found M ∼ 3×1011 g s−1. Using a similar energy balance argument, Lammer et al. (2003) obtained M ∼ 3 × 1011 g s−1, but Yelle (2004) suggested that this result could be an overestimate as a result of not including H+ 3 cooling and ionization of H. A critical question is whether line absorption during transit is produced entirely by the outflowing thermal plasma or whether high-velocity atoms and ions (either at higher temperatures or nonthermal) are required to explain the broadest part of the absorption line profiles. Ben-Jaffel & Sona Hosseini (2010) show that neutral hydrogen absorption by scaled hydrodynamic outflow models may explain the flux decrease during transit even at ±100 km s−1 from the center of the Lyman-α line, but such models predict much less absorption during transit than is detected in the unresolved O I and C II line flux measure- ments (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2004). Additional high-velocity absorbers are needed to explain the O I, C II, and probably also the Lyman-α data, but there is no agreement concern- ing the source of the high-velocity absorbers. One possibility is radiation pressure, but Murray-Clay et al. (2009) argue that the observed absorption near +100 km s−1 from the center of the Lyman-α line is difficult to explain by stellar radiation pressure as originally pro- posed by Vidal-Madjar et al. (2003). However, radiation pressure on neutral hydrogen atoms must be present, and Lecavelier des Etangs et al. (2008b) argue that radiation pressure by it- self can explain the Lyman-α observations. Holmstrom et al. (2008) and Murray-Clay et al. (2009) argue that the observed decrease in Lyman-α flux near and beyond ±100 km s−1 during transit requires high-velocity H atoms that could be explained by charge exchange between stellar wind protons and neutral H atoms in the exoplanet's outflow. These high- velocity H atoms are called ENAs (energetic neutral atoms). Ben-Jaffel & Sona Hosseini (2010) have tested whether the presence of high-velocity atoms and ions could explain the flux reduction observed in the unresolved O I and C II line transit data. They assume that a portion of the gas has an effective temperature (either thermal or nonthermal) many times larger than the thermal temperature in outflow models. For the unresolved C II 1334, 1335 A multiplet, they can explain the observed flux reduction by C+ ions with effective temperatures 5.5 -- 107 times larger than the background gas temperature (TB) in typical hydrodynamic models depending on the properties of the outflow models and the assumed location of the C+ ions. In Figure 9 of their paper, they -- 15 -- show examples of predicted C II 1334 A line profiles during transit with TCII/TB ∼ 16 and ∼ 28 that can explain the total decrease in unresolved line flux during transit, but these particular examples are either too narrow or triangular in shape, unlike the observed C II line profiles which show significant flux reduction between -- 50 and +50 km s−1 with probable enhanced absorption near -- 10 and +15 km s−1. Ben-Jaffel (private communication) informs us that other models with somewhat larger TCII/TB ratios can explain the flat reduction in C II line flux between -- 50 and +50 km s−1. However these models have ad hoc velocity distributions and they do not explain the observed velocity structure. In their paper, they conclude that COS spectra are needed to "...reveal the true balance between thermal and non-thermal populations...". We encourage the development of new models, preferably based on plausible physical mechanisms, to explain the observed line profiles. Our analysis of the C II line absorption during transit assuming only thermal absorption Mtotal = 8.0× 1010 g s−1. by 10,000 K gas and solar carbon abundance led to our estimate of This mass-loss rate is somewhat larger than the theoretical estimates mentioned above that assume an outflow with no metals. The assumption of no metals in the outflow is clearly unrealistic as we observe absorption by C II and Si III at 2.36Rplanet. At the same time, our analysis of the C II lines assuming only thermal line broadening (at 10,000 K) is unrealistic as the thermal velocity is only 3.7 km s−1, and we observe absorption out to ±50 km s−1. Since we measure the mass flux at the limb of the outflow where the C II optical depth is small (τ = 0.69), we cannot invoke optical thickness to explain the broad profile. Note that the same is true for the Lyman-α line, but (as the referee has called to our attention) Ben-Jaffel & Sona Hosseini (2010) and other authors include opacity and Lorentzian line shapes at the limb as a possible mechanism for absorption line broadening. Equation 3 shows that MCII is proportional to the Doppler broadening parameter ∆νD. To obtain 8% absorption at ±50 km s−1 from line center requires either turbulent broadening with velocity of about 50 km s−1 or superthermal C+ ions with similar velocities. If turbulent broadening is responsible, then the mass-loss rate increases by a factor of 13 to Mtotal = 1 × 1012 g s−1. However, 50 km s−1 turbulent velocities are highly supersonic and unlikely. We estimate that a sensible upper limit to the turbulent velocity would be twice the flow speed or 20 km s−1, for which Mtotal ≈ 4 × 1011 g s−1. This would increase Mtotal/Mplanet to ≈ 4 × 10−11 yr−1. If high-velocity C+ ions are responsible for the broad absorption, then the mass-loss rate could be closer to the thermal value because only a small fraction of the C+ ions are Mtotal = (8 -- 40)×1010 g s−1 is consistent likely to have high velocities. We conclude that with the C II line profiles. We find it interesting that when Garcia Munoz (2007) includes metals with solar abundances in his hydrodynamic mass outflow models, the mass-loss rate -- 16 -- increases from M = 1.4 × 1011 to M = 4.95 × 1011 g s−1, a value near the top end of our empirical mass-loss rate estimate. Thus high-velocity C+ ions are required to explain the C II absorption during transit. Similar arguments would likely explain the broad Si III transit absorption. 6. CONCLUSIONS The high sensitivity and moderate spectral resolution of COS allowed us to obtain the first measurements of gas absorption in the exosphere of a transiting exoplanet in lines of C II and Si III with velocity resolution. During transits of HD 209458, we found that the mean flux in these lines is reduced by 7.8 ± 1.3% for the co-added C II lines and 8.2 ± 1.4% for the Si III line in the velocity range -- 50 to +50 km s−1. The 8% absorption constraint sets the location of the outflow limb (2.36Rplanet) where the C II lines become optically thin. Theoretical hydrodynamic models show that the outflow velocity is about 10 km s−1 and gas temperature about 10,000 K at this location. If we assume that the outflow is purely thermal, then Mtotal = 8 × 1010 g s−1, somewhat larger than theoretical estimates based on outflows with no metals. Since absorption in the C II lines is much broader than indicated by Doppler broadening with a thermal velocity of 3.7 km s−1, the lines must be broadened by large turbulence or high-velocity C+ ions. If turbulent broadening dominates, then the 8% absorption seen out to ±50 km s−1 would require mass-loss rates as large as 1 × 1012 g s−1, but such highly supersonic velocities are not likely. Instead, absorption by high-velocity C+ and Si++ ions formed by the interaction of the stellar wind and planetary mass loss or some other mechanism broadens the C II and Si III lines. We conclude that the mass-loss rate in the exoplanet's outflow is in the range (8 -- 40)×1010 g s−1. These rates assume that the carbon abundance is solar, which is not the case for the giant planets in the solar system. We note that mass-loss rates predicted by hydrodynamic models that include solar abundant metals in the outflow lie at the upper limit of this range. Comparison of the C II and Si III line depths and transit/non-transit line ratios shows deep absorption features near -- 10 and +15 km s−1 in both lines. Since the C II and Si III lines are likely formed in the same region of the exosphere, we include in Figure 4 the co- addition of the two profiles with typical error bars for comparison with theoretical models. The increase in S/N with the co-addition of the C II and Si III spectra allows us to make more definitive statements about the velocity structure. The dips near -- 10 and +15 km s−1 are more than twice as large as the errors per spectral resolution element (about 17 km s−1) and are most likely real. In addition, the ratios near -- 40 and +30 -- 70 km s−1 are also low, but the line fluxes decrease rapidly away from line center and these low ratios are less certain. -- 17 -- Future observations with higher S/N are needed to confirm this first detection of velocity structure in the expanding atmosphere of an exoplanet. The COS transit observations of the absorption velocity structure in these lines demon- strate the need for including high-velocity C+ and Si++ ions in models of the exosphere of HD 209458b and presumably other close-in exoplanets. It remains to be seen whether the inclusion of a simple distribution of ions with high effective temperature as proposed by Ben-Jaffel & Sona Hosseini (2010) is adequate to explain the data. The new COS data provide the opportunity to test a range of absorption models based on such physical mecha- nisms as radiation pressure, charge exchange, and interactions between the stellar wind and the planet's outflow to understand mass-loss processes in the exospheres of close-in planets. This work is supported by NASA through grants NNX08AC146 and NAS5-98043 to the University of Colorado at Boulder. We thank the many people at the Space Telescope Science Institute, Goddard Space Flight Center, Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. and CASA at the University of Colorado for the excellent hardware and software that has made COS a great success. We particularly wish to thank the referee for his many thoughtful and thorough comments and his bringing to our attention important publications that have led to significant modifications in the paper. We thank Dr. J. Schneider for encouraging us to look for an assymetry between ingress and egress. We also thank Dr. Lofti Ben-Jaffel for clarifying our understanding of the Ben-Jaffel & Hosseini (2010) paper. We thank Dr. Alain Lecavelier for calling our attention to the different values of τ at the limb that depend on the density structure in the envelope. REFERENCES Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481 Baliunas, S. L. & Butler, S. E. 1980, ApJ, 235, L45 Ballester, G. E., Sing, D. K., & Herbert, F. 2007, Nature, 445, 511 Baraffe, I., Selsis, F., Chabrier, G., Barman, T. S., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., & Lammer, H. 2004, A&A, 419, L13 Ben-Jaffel, L. 2007, ApJ, 671, L61 Ben-Jaffel, L. 2008, ApJ, 688, 1352 Ben-Jaffel, L. & Sona Hosseini, S. 2010, ApJ, 709, 1284 -- 18 -- Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D., & Mayor, M. 2000, ApJ, 529, L45 Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Noyes, R. W., & Gilliland, R. L. 2002, ApJ, 568, 377 Ehrenreich, D. et al. 2008, A&A, 483, 933 Garcia Munoz, A. 2007, Planet. Space Sci., 55, 1426 France, K., Stocke, J. T., Yang, H., Linsky, J. L., Froning, C. S., Green, J. C., & Osterman, S. N. 2010, ApJ, to appear Ghavamian, P. et al. 2010 BAAS, 42, 499 Henry, G. W., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., & Vogt, S. S. 2000, ApJ, 529, L41 Holmstrom, M., Ekenback, A., Selsis, F., Penz, T., Lammer, H., & Wurz, P. 2008, Nature, 451, 970 Jaritz, G. F., Endler, S., Langmayr, D., Lammer, H., Griessmeier, J.-M., Erkaev, N. V., & Biernat, H. K. 2005, A&A, 439, 771 Koskinen, T. T., Aylward, A. D., & Miller, S. 2007, Nature, 450, 845 Koskinen, T. T., Yelle, R. V., Lavvas, P., & Lewis, N. K. 2010, arXiv:1004.1396 Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Noyes, R. W., Brown, T.M., & Gilliland, R. L. 2007, ApJ, 655, 564 Lammer, H., Selsis, F., Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., Bauer, S. J., & Weiss, W. W. 2003, ApJ, 598, L121 Lecavelier des Etangs, A. 2007, A&A, 461, 1185 Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Vidal-Madjar, A., McConnell, J. C., & H´ebrard, G. 2004, A&A, 418, L1 Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Pont, F., Vidal-Madjar, A., & Sing, D. 2008a, A&A, 481, L83 Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Vidal-Madjar, A., & Desert, J.-M. 2008b, Nature, 458, E1 Mazeh, T. et al. 2000, ApJ, 532, L55 Murray-Clay, R. A., Chiang, E. I., & Murray, N. 2009, ApJ, 693, 23 Redfield, S. & Linsky, J. L. 2008, ApJ, 673, 283 -- 19 -- Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., Gudel, M., & Audard, M. 2005, ApJ, 622, 680 Rottman, G. 2006, Space Sci. Rev., 125, 39 Schneider, J., Rauer, H., Lasota, J. P., Bonazzola, S., & Chassefi`ere, E. 1998, in ASP Conf. Series 134, Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Planets, ed. R. Rebolo, E. L. Mart´ın, & M. R. Zapatero Osorio (San Francisco, ASP), 241 Schneiter, E. M., Vel´azquez, P. F., Esquivel, A., Raga, A. C., & Blanco-Cano, X. 2007 ApJ, 671, 57 Tian, F., Toon, O. B., Pavlov, A. A., & De Sterck, H. 2005, ApJ, 621, 1049 Wittenmyer, R. A. et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, 1157 Vidal-Madjar, A. et al. 2003, Nature, 422, 143 Vidal-Madjar, A. et al. 2004, ApJ, 604, L69 Vidal-Madjar, A., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., D´esert, J.-M., Ballester, G. E., Ferlet, R., H´ebrard, G., & Mayor, M. 2008, ApJ, 676, L57 Yelle, R. V. 2004, Icarus, 170, 167 Yelle, R. V. 2006, Icarus, 183, 508 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. -- 20 -- Transit Non−Transit Si IV Cl I O I O I 1360 1380 Wavelength (Å) Si IV O IV] O IV] 1400 C II C II ) 1 − Å 2 − m c 1 − s g r e 5 1 − 0 1 ( x u F l 5 4 3 2 1 0 1340 Fig. 1. -- A portion of the COS G130M spectrum of HD 209458. The lower (black) plot is the sum of four spectra obtained during transit. The upper (red) plot (displaced upward) is the sum of the ten quadrature and four secondary eclipse spectra. -- 21 -- Si III 1206.50 Å Si IV 1393.76 Å 8 6 4 2 0 −100 0.4 0.0 ) 1 − Å 2 − m c 1 − s g r e 5 1 − 0 1 ( x u F l −0.4 −0.8 −1.2 −100 −50 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 o i t a R Transit coaddition of 4 exposures Non−transit coaddition of 14 exposures −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) Si III 1206.50 Å. Difference: black−red 50 100 Transit coaddition of 4 exposures Non−transit coaddition of 14 exposures −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) Si IV 1393.76 Å. Difference: black−red 50 100 4 3 2 1 0 −100 0.4 0.0 ) 1 − Å 2 − m c 1 − s g r e 5 1 − 0 1 ( x u F l −0.4 0 Velocity (km s−1) Si III 1206.50 Å. Ratio: black/red 50 100 −100 −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) Si IV 1393.76 Å. Ratio: black/red 50 100 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 o i t a R −100 −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) 50 100 0.4 −100 −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) 50 100 Fig. 2. -- Upper panels: Comparison of the four co-added spectra obtained during transit (black) with the co-added non-transit spectra (red) for the Si III and Si IV lines. Repre- sentative error bars per pixel are included. Middle panels: difference spectra (transit minus non-transit) with representative error bars. Lower panels: flux ratio (transit/non-transit) spectra. The ratios are not plotted beyond ±50 km s−1 as the errors are large at low flux levels. The velocity scale is relative to the -- 14.8 km s−1 radial velocity of the star. -- 22 -- C II 1334.53 Å C II 1335.69 Å Transit coaddition of 4 exposures Non−transit coaddition of 14 exposures ISM −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) 50 100 C II 1334.53 Å. Difference: black−red 3 2 1 0 −100 0.4 0.0 ) 1 − Å 2 − m c 1 − s g r e 5 1 − 0 1 ( x u F l Transit coaddition of 4 exposures Non−transit coaddition of 14 exposures −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) 50 100 C II 1335.69 Å. Difference: black−red 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 −100 0.4 0.0 −0.4 −0.8 −1.2 Coaddition of both C II lines Transit Non−transit −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) Difference: black−red 50 100 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 −100 0.4 0.0 −0.4 −0.8 −1.2 −0.4 −0.8 −100 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 o i t a R −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) 50 100 −100 −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) 50 100 −100 −50 C II 1334.53 Å. Ratio: black/red C II 1335.69 Å. Ratio: black/red 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0 Velocity (km s−1) Ratio: black/red 50 100 −100 −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) 50 100 −100 −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) 50 100 −100 −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) 50 100 Fig. 3. -- Upper panels: Comparison of the four co-added spectra obtained during transit (black) with the co-added non-transit spectra (red) for the C II 1334.53 A and 1335.69 A lines. The upper right panel show a co-addition of both C II lines on the same velocity scale. Representative error bars per pixel are included. Middle panels: difference spectra (transit minus non-transit) with representative error bars for each C II line and the combined C II line. Lower panels: flux ratio (transit/non-transit) spectra. The ratios are not plotted beyond ±50 km s−1 as the errors are large at low flux levels. The velocity scale is relative to the -- 14.8 km s−1 radial velocity of the star. 0.4 0.0 −0.4 −0.8 −1.2 −100 −50 C II lines coaddition Si III 1206 line −50 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 −100 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 −100 -- 23 -- Difference 0 Ratio 0 Ratio C II lines coaddition Si III 1206 line 50 100 50 100 Coaddition of C II and Si III lines −50 0 Velocity (km s−1) 50 100 Fig. 4. -- Upper and middle panels: Comparison of the difference spectra (transit minus non- transit) and ratio spectra (transit/non-transit) for the co-addition of the C II Lines (black) and the Si III line (red). Lower panel: Co-addition of the C II and Si III ratio spectra with typical errors per spectral resolution element (about 17 km s−1). The horizontal line at 0.92 is the mean ratio for the velocity interval -- 50 to +50 km s−1. The dips near -- 10 and +15 km s−1 are each more than 2σ and likely real. The low ratio features near -- 40 and +30 -- 70 km s−1 occur where the line fluxes are low and are thus less certain. -- 24 -- Table 1. Propertiesa of HD 209458 and HD 209458b Spectral type Distance (pc) M⋆/M⊙ R⋆/R⊙ Porbit (days) Rplanet/RJup Mplanet/MJup ρplanet/ρJup Semimajor axis (AU) Stellar flux at planet/Jupiter Escape speed (km/s) Orbital Velocity ampl. (km/s) Transit duration (hr) Transit depth for Rplanet Transit depth for RRoche G0 V 47 1.101+0.066 −0.062 1.125+0.020 −0.023 3.52474859(38) 1.320+0.024 −0.025 0.64 ± 0.06 0.26 ± 0.04 0.045 13,400 42 ± 4 146 3.22 1.5% 10% aData from Knutson et al. (2007). -- 25 -- Table 2. COS G130M Observations of HD 209458 (Program 11534) Exp. Time (s) Phase Day Start Stop 2340.2 0955.2 1851.2 0560.0 2235.1 2340.2 0945.2 1787.2 0925.2 1798.2 1045.2 1096.2 1400.2 1405.2 1057.2 1093.1 1401.2 1405.2 0.2516 -- 0.2593 0.2684 -- 0.2716 0.2722 -- 0.2782 0.2873 -- 0.2891 0.2898 -- 0.2971 0.7059 -- 0.7136 0.7229 -- 0.7260 0.7266 -- 0.7324 0.7417 -- 0.7448 0.7454 -- 0.7513 0.9913 -- 0.9947 0.9954 -- 0.9990 0.0077 -- 0.0123 0.0129 -- 0.0175 0.4880 -- 0.4915 0.4921 -- 0.4957 0.5043 -- 0.5089 0.5095 -- 0.5141 19 Sep 19 Sep 19 Sep 19 Sep 19 Sep 24 Sep 24 Sep 24 Sep 24 Sep 24 Sep 02 Oct 02 Oct 02 Oct 02 Oct 18 Oct 18 Oct 18 Oct 18 Oct 10:10:15 11:35:37 11:54:40 13:11:29 13:24:06 13:12:09 14:38:04 14:56:57 16:13:54 16:32:36 14:32:10 14:52:52 15:55:28 16:21:56 10:57:04 11:17:49 12:19:37 12:46:06 10:49:15 11:51:32 12:25:31 13:20:49 14:01:21 13:51:09 14:53:49 15:26:44 16:29:19 17:02:34 14:49:35 15:11:08 16:18:48 16:45:21 11:14:41 11:36.02 12:42:58 13:09:31 Gapa (A) 1278 -- 1290 1288 -- 1299 1296 -- 1306 1288 -- 1299 1306 -- 1316 1278 -- 1290 1288 -- 1299 1296 -- 1306 1288 -- 1299 1306 -- 1316 1278 -- 1290 1288 -- 1299 1296 -- 1306 1306 -- 1316 1278 -- 1290 1288 -- 1299 1296 -- 1306 1306 -- 1316 aThe gap is the wavelength interval between the two detector faceplate el- ements. No data are available for the gap region, and there are instrumental artifacts at wavelengths close to the gap.
1508.04795	1	1508	2015-08-19T21:00:28	Jupiter's Deep Cloud Structure Revealed Using Keck Observations of Spectrally Resolved Line Shapes	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Technique: We present a method to determine the pressure at which significant cloud opacity is present between 2 and 6 bars on Jupiter. We use: a) the strength of a Fraunhofer absorption line in a zone to determine the ratio of reflected sunlight to thermal emission, and b) pressure-broadened line profiles of deuterated methane (CH3D) at 4.66 microns to determine the location of clouds. We use radiative transfer models to constrain the altitude region of both the solar and thermal components of Jupiter's 5-micron spectrum. Results: For nearly all latitudes on Jupiter the thermal component is large enough to constrain the deep cloud structure even when upper clouds are present. We find that Hot Spots, belts, and high latitudes have broader line profiles than do zones. Radiative transfer models show that Hot Spots in the North and South Equatorial Belts (NEB, SEB) typically do not have opaque clouds at pressures greater than 2 bars. The South Tropical Zone (STZ) at 32 degrees S has an opaque cloud top between 4 and 5 bars. From thermochemical models this must be a water cloud. We measured the variation of the equivalent width of CH3D with latitude for comparison with Jupiter's belt-zone structure. We also constrained the vertical profile of water in an SEB Hot Spot and in the STZ. The Hot Spot is very dry for P<4.5 bars and then follows the water profile observed by the Galileo Probe. The STZ has a saturated water profile above its cloud top between 4 and 5 bars.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Jupiter's Deep Cloud Structure Revealed Using Keck Observations of Spectrally Resolved Line Shapes G. L. Bjoraker NASA/GSFC Code 693, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA [email protected] Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA M. H. Wong Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA I. de Pater and M. ´Ad´amkovics Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA ABSTRACT Technique: We present a method to determine the pressure at which significant cloud opacity is present between 2 and 6 bars on Jupiter. We use: a) the strength of a Fraunhofer absorption line in a zone to determine the ratio of reflected sunlight to thermal emission, and b) pressure- broadened line profiles of deuterated methane (CH3D) at 4.66 µm to determine the location of clouds. We use radiative transfer models to constrain the altitude region of both the solar and thermal components of Jupiter's 5-µm spectrum. Results: For nearly all latitudes on Jupiter the thermal component is large enough to constrain the deep cloud structure even when upper clouds are present. We find that Hot Spots, belts, and high latitudes have broader line profiles than do zones. Radiative transfer models show that Hot Spots in the North and South Equatorial Belts (NEB, SEB) typically do not have opaque clouds at pressures greater than 2 bars. The South Tropical Zone (STZ) at 32◦S has an opaque cloud top between 4 and 5 bars. From thermochemical models this must be a water cloud. We measured the variation of the equivalent width of CH3D with latitude for comparison with Jupiter's belt-zone structure. We also constrained the vertical profile of H2O in an SEB Hot Spot and in the STZ. The Hot Spot is very dry for P<4.5 bars and then follows the H2O profile observed by the Galileo Probe. The STZ has a saturated H2O profile above its cloud top between 4 and 5 bars. Subject headings: planets and satellites: individual (Jupiter) -- planets and satellites: atmospheres 1. INTRODUCTION The abundance of H2O in Jupiter's atmosphere is of fundamental importance in understanding the origin of Jupiter, the composition of its clouds, and Jovian dynamics beneath the upper cloud layers. Water was first detected on Jupiter by Larson et al. (1975) using the Kuiper Airborne Observatory (KAO). Bjoraker et al. (1986a,b) an- alyzed both KAO and Voyager IRIS spectra in Jupiter's 5-µm spectral window to the deep at- 1 mosphere, finding a deep water abundance highly depleted with respect to the solar abundance. The spectrum between 4.5 and 5.4 µm provides a wealth of information about the gas composi- tion and cloud structure of the troposphere of this giant planet. Jupiter's 5-µm spectrum is a mix- ture of scattered sunlight and thermal emission that changes significantly between belts and zones. Jupiter exhibits remarkable spatial structure at 5 µm. Chemical models of Jupiter's cloud struc- ture predict three distinct layers: an NH3 ice cloud near 0.5 bars, an NH4SH cloud formed from a re- action of NH3 and H2S at 2 bars, and a massive water ice/liquid solution cloud near 5 or 6 bars, de- pending on assumptions of composition and ther- mal structure (see Weidenschilling & Lewis (1973) and Wong et al. (2015)). Thermal emission from the deep atmosphere is attenuated by the variable opacity of one or more of these three cloud lay- ers. Hot Spots, located primarily in the North and South Equatorial Belts (NEB, SEB), exhibit 5- µm radiances up to 70 times larger than surround- ing regions due to a minimum of cloud opacity. They also appear brighter than their surroundings at microwave wavelengths due to a low ammonia abundance (Sault et al. 2004). The interpretation of 5-µm spectra of Jupiter, and the H2O abundance in particular, has been hampered by uncertainties in the pressure level of the lower boundary of the emitting region. Two different models have been proposed. Bjoraker et al. (1986a,b) suggested that thermal radiation at 5 µm originates from levels as deep as 8 bars, 310 K where unit optical depth in H2 occurs. In contrast, Carlson et al. (1992) proposed a model in which a massive water-ice cloud establishes the lower boundary near 5 bars, 273 K. Bjoraker et al. fitted KAO and Voyager IRIS spectra of H2O in Jupiter's Hot Spots with a small abun- dance (4-30 ppm) distributed along a long path (60 km) between 2 and 8 bars. They also mea- sured H2O abundances in the low-flux zone regions using Voyager spectra. The NEB hot spots were found to be depleted in H2O between 2 and 4 bars, but belts, zones, and hot spots could all be fitted by the same H2O profile (4-30 ppm) between 4 and 8 bars. In marked contrast, Carlson et al. fit- ted Voyager Hot-Spot spectra using a much larger mixing ratio (up to 3000 ppm, equivalent to 3× the solar O/H measured by Asplund et al. (2009)) 2 confined to a narrow layer (10 km) between 4 and 5 bars immediately above an opaque water cloud. Carlson et al. also examined Voyager spectra of the Equatorial Zone (EQZ) and other regions away from hot spots. All regions required a saturated H2O profile that increased from 300 ppm at 4 bars to 3000 ppm at 5 bars, although NEB hot spots were sub-saturated in the 2 to 4 bar region. The Galileo Probe measured water vapor in situ at a single location on Jupiter, but unan- swered questions remain about its global abun- dance. The probe entered Jupiter's atmosphere at 6.5◦N planetocentric latitude near the south- ern portion of an NEB hot spot. The Galileo Probe Mass Spectrometer (Niemann et al. 1992) found water increasing with depth, from an up- per limit of 0.8 ppm at 2.7 bar, to measured mole fractions of 40±13 ppm at 11.0-11.7 bar and 420±140 ppm at 18-21 bar (Niemann et al. (1998) and Wong et al. (2004b)). The deepest value cor- responds to 0.45× solar O/H. Ground-based imag- ing has shown that 5-µm hot spots, such as the one entered by the Galileo probe, cover less than 1% of the surface area of Jupiter (Orton et al. 1996). Thus, the H2O abundances observed by the probe may be characteristic of all or most hot spots, but they are probably not representative of Jupiter as a whole, especially since a range of other indirect studies (lightning flash depths, the tropospheric CO abundance, and discrete clouds at P ≥ 4 bar) point to solar or supersolar water abundances (Wong et al. 2008). Since the Galileo probe found that carbon, sulfur, and nitrogen were enriched by ∼4× solar (Wong et al. 2004b), oxy- gen may also be enhanced by the same amount. Some formation models require ∼10× solar O/H in order to trap Jupiter's volatiles inside cages of water ice clathrates (Hersant et al. 2004). The Juno mission, scheduled to begin orbiting Jupiter in July 2016, should answer many of these ques- tions. The Microwave Radiometer will measure water vapor below Jupiter's clouds to determine the O/H ratio (Janssen et al. 2005). Interpreta- tion of these data may not be straightforward, however, due to e.g., the small microwave ab- sorptivity of H2O gas compared with NH3 (see de Pater et al. (2005) for details). A complemen- tary way to determine the deep H2O abundance, therefore, is highly desirable. The Jovian In- frared Auroral Mapper (JIRAM) will acquire near- infrared spectra of Jupiter, including the 5-micron window (Adriani et al. 2014). (2001) Water ice has been detected in isolated regions where active convection lofted the ice well above its condensation level (Simon-Miller et al. 2000), but water clouds are generally hidden by overlying NH3 and NH4SH clouds (e.g. Sromovsky & Fry (2010)). Only very thin clouds were found in the Galileo Probe Hot Spot (Ragent et al. 1998), consistent with condensation via weak turbu- lent updrafts within the descending branch of an equatorially-trapped Rossby wave (Friedson (2005), Wong et al. (2015)). Models of NIMS spectra by Nixon et al. include water clouds in at least some Hot Spots, and Roos-Serote et al. (2004) showed that NIMS spectra of Hot Spots cannot rule out water clouds whose opacity is entirely restricted to P > 5 bar. Evidence for water clouds in Jupiter's zones is also ambigu- ous. Drossart et al. (1998) compared dayside and nightside NIMS spectra of low-flux regions in the EQZ. A saturated H2O profile above an opaque water cloud at 5 bars provides a satisfactory fit to these data. At the spectral resolution of IRIS (4.3 cm−1) and NIMS (10 cm−1) we can only retrieve a column abundance of H2O above an assumed lower boundary, which can be either a water cloud or opacity due to H2. Thus, we sim- ply cannot tell whether or not Hot Spots or zones have water clouds. This problem will also affect the interpretation of 5-µm spectra from JIRAM on Juno, which has the same spectral resolution as Voyager/IRIS (Adriani et al. 2014). In Section 2 we present ground-based observa- tions of Jupiter's belts and zones that have suffi- cient spectral resolution to resolve line shapes. We demonstrate that we can derive the cloud struc- ture at P > 2 bars even when higher-altitude clouds greatly attenuate the thermal flux from the deep atmosphere. We used line shapes to detect water clouds and to determine the pres- sure at which these clouds become optically thick. This resolves the ambiguity of whether the lower boundary of the 5-µm line formation region is due to H2 or due to opaque clouds. This, in turn, will yield more accurate gas abundances for use in con- straining models of Jupiter's origin and in under- standing the dynamics of the atmosphere beneath the upper clouds. 2. OBSERVATIONS Five-micron spectra of Jupiter were acquired using NIRSPEC on the Keck 2 telescope on March 11, 2014. NIRSPEC is an echelle spectrograph with 3 orders dispersed onto a 1024x1024 InSb ar- ray at 5 µm at our selected grating/cross-disperser settings of 60.48 / 36.9 (McLean et al. 1998). A 0.4′′× 24′′slit was aligned north-south on the cen- tral meridian of Jupiter, resulting in spectra with a resolving power of 20,000. NIRSPEC has an ad- vantage over instrumentation on other telescopes (for example CSHELL on the IRTF) due to the fact that 3 echelle orders at 5 µm are placed on the detector array. Thus, each pixel along the slit corresponding to different latitudes on Jupiter has simultaneous spectra at 4.6, 5.0, and 5.3 µm. In this paper we will focus on Order 16 covering 2131- 2165 cm−1 (4.62-4.69 µm) and Order 15 which covers 1999-2031 cm−1 (4.92-5.00 µm). Jupiter subtended 41′′ and the geocentric Doppler shift was 26.3 km/sec. The water vapor column above Mauna Kea was 2 precipitable mm derived from fitting telluric lines in the Jupiter spectra. We did not use stellar spectra for flux calibration or at- mospheric transmission because the humidity dou- bled between the time of the Jupiter and stellar observations. The flux calibration is described in Section 3. Fig. 1 shows an image of Jupiter us- ing the SCAM guide camera on NIRSPEC. Al- though the spectroscopy was performed at 5-µm, the guide camera works at shorter wavelengths. A K-prime filter centered at 2.12 µm was used to obtain sufficient contrast to separate the bands of variable haze reflectivity overlying Jupiter's belts and zones. Two slit positions were required to ob- tain pole-pole spectra of Jupiter. In Fig. 1 spatial pixels that exhibit maxima in flux at 4.66 µm are shown in red, locations that exhibit narrow line profiles at 4.66 µm are shown in blue, and regions that have broad pressure-broadened line profiles are shown in green. We focus on two spatial loca- tions with characteristically different spectra: Re- gion A in the South Tropical Zone (STZ) at 32◦S, and Region B, a Hot Spot in the SEB at 17◦S. We developed radiative transfer models to calculate synthetic spectra for regions A and B, as described below. The band pass at 4.66 µm contains absorption lines of deuterated methane (CH3D), phosphine 3 Variation in CH3D Line Profiles Equivalent Width Integration 1.0 0.8 Solar 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 PH3 EQZ NTZ 56oN 52oN NEB Hot Spot CH3D H2O T i e c n a d a R d e z i l a m r o N 2142.0 2143.0 2144.0 2145.0 2146.0 Wavenumber Fig. 2. -- Jupiter spectra at 4.66 µm (NIRSPEC order 16) show dramatic variation with latitude in the strength and width of CH3D lines. Four absorption features are de- noted by vertical lines. Narrow CH3D lines are observed in the Equatorial and North Tropical Zones (EQZ, NTZ), but they are much broader in Hot Spots and at high northern latitudes. A phosphine (PH3) line and a Doppler-shifted H2O line are shown. Fraunhofer lines (CO in the Sun) are only observed in low-flux zones. T denotes telluric lines. NIRSPEC order 16) of 5 regions in Jupiter's north- ern hemisphere that exhibit either a maximum in flux (an NEB Hot Spot at 8.5◦N), minima in the equivalent width of CH3D (the EQZ at 0.5◦N and NTZ at 23◦N), or local maxima in CH3D equivalent width. A horizontal bar indi- cates the limits that we chose for numerical in- tegration of the equivalent width that includes six absorption lines of CH3D (blended into four at this spectral resolution). All spectra are nor- malized to 1.0 at 2141.6 cm−1 to facilitate com- parison of line shapes, since the radiance of the NEB Hot Spot is 70 times that of the NTZ. A tel- luric H2O line, its Doppler-shifted counterpart, a PH3 feature, and a Fraunhofer line due to CO in the Sun are also shown. Note that the Fraun- hofer line is observed only in low-flux zone regions such as the EQZ and NTZ. In Sections 3 and 4 we describe how the strength of this feature can be used to constrain cloud models. The equivalent width of the set of CH3D lines at 2144 cm−1 varies dramatically from belt to zone. Hot Spots and belts exhibit broad pressure-broadened line pro- files, while zones have much narrower features that are resolved as 4 distinct CH3D absorption lines. Note that an isolated CH3D line would be spectrally resolved at a resolving power of 20,000 SEB Hot Spot STZ B A Fig. 1. -- Keck/SCAM image of Jupiter at 2.12 µm shows 2 NIRSPEC slit positions, one in the northern, and one in the southern hemisphere. Curvature is due to navigating positions onto an image taken a few minutes earlier. Red pixels denote Hot Spots. Blue pixels denote positions of minima in deuterated methane (CH3D) equivalent width and thus candidates for opaque clouds. Green regions de- note maxima in CH3D equivalent width and thus regions without opaque clouds. Radiative transfer models were used to calculate synthetic spectra for the zone marked A and the SEB Hot Spot labeled B. (PH3), and H2O. Methane and its isotopologues do not condense, and they are not destroyed pho- tochemically, in Jupiter's troposphere. We there- fore assume that CH4 and CH3D have a con- stant mixing ratio with respect to H2 in Jupiter's troposphere, which means that variations in the strength and shape of CH4 and CH3D lines be- tween belts and zones on Jupiter should be due to changes in cloud structure, not gas concentration. Bjoraker et al. (2002) measured the spatial varia- tion of the weak ν 3- ν 4 band of CH4 at 5.18 µm in an attempt to derive cloud structure. Unfortu- nately, they were unable to calculate synthetic spectra that fit this feature. This is possibly due to inaccurate or incomplete spectroscopic parameters such as line strengths and broadening parameters. Spectroscopic parameters for the much stronger ν 2 fundamental band of CH3D at 2200 cm−1, or 4.5 µm, are well known (Nikitin et al. 1997) and as shown below we now are able to derive cloud structure and spatial variations therein. Fig. 2 shows spectra at 4.66 µm (2144 cm−1, 4 (0.11 cm−1 resolution). This is because molecules such as CH3D typically have broadening coeffi- cients of 0.06 cm−1/atm and the line formation region on Jupiter at 4.66 µm takes place at pres- sures greater than 2 bars. 3. DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS Absolute flux calibration was performed for both NIRSPEC orders 15 and 16 by smoothing the spectrum of the NEB Hot Spot at 8.5◦N to 4.3 cm−1 resolution, dividing by the transmittance of the Earth's atmosphere above Mauna Kea, and scaling the radiance of the resulting spectrum to an average of the 4 hottest spectra of Jupiter's NEB observed by Voyager IRIS in 1979. In addition to pressure-broadened line pro- files, the spectrum at 4.66 µm provides valu- able information on the ratio of reflected sun- light to thermal emission on Jupiter, which is critical for understanding Jupiter's cloud struc- ture. We compared the equivalent width of the Fraunhofer line at 2141.8 cm−1 with its measured value in the Sun using data from the Atmospheric Trace Molecule Spectroscopy (ATMOS) experi- ment which flew on the space shuttle Challenger in 1985 (Farmer & Norton 1989; Farmer 1994). Solar Fraunhofer lines in spectra of Jupiter arise from regions with a significant fraction of reflected sunlight, such as locations with thick high clouds. Fraunhofer lines are not observed in regions that are dominated by thermal emission, such as Hot Spots. We selected a zone at 32◦S (marked"A" on Figures 1, 4, and 5) for further study based on the strength of this particular Fraunhofer line. It is 43% as strong as in the Sun; thus, 57% of the flux consists of thermal emission originating in the deep atmosphere that has been attenu- ated by one or more cloud layers before escaping to space. This thermal flux preserves the broad line profiles of CH3D caused by collisions with H2 and He in its line formation region at the deepest levels probed. We excluded the spectrum of the NTZ shown in Fig. 2 for studies of the deep atmosphere because the Fraunhofer line is 95% as strong as in the Sun; thus, there is insufficient thermal flux to constrain the deep cloud structure at 23◦N. We also modeled the SEB Hot Spot at 17◦S and 208◦W (marked "B" on Figures 1, 4, and 5), which had the highest radiance in our entire dataset. The noise level was measured using the standard deviation of the number of counts in the spectral pixel corresponding to a saturated telluric water line in each order. This was evaluated over 11 spatial pixels over the lowest flux region (the STZ) and also for 11 spatial pixels off of Jupiter. Both gave the same result. In Order 16 the sig- nal to noise ratio (S/N) of the SEB Hot Spot at 2141.6 cm−1 was 2500; the S/N of the zone at 32◦S was 48. In Order 15 where strong H2O lines occur, the S/N of the same Hot Spot was 1900 at 2012.2 cm−1 ; the S/N of the STZ was 35. Synthetic spectra were calculated using the Spectrum Synthesis Program (SSP) radiative transfer code as described in Kunde & Maguire (1974). The input temperature profile was ob- tained from the Galileo Probe (Seiff et al. 1998). Line parameters for CH3D and other 5-µm ab- sorbers are from GEISA 2003 (Jacquinet-Husson et al. 2005). Parameters for CH3D-H2 and CH3D- He broadening have been measured in the lab (Boussin et al. 1999; Lerot et al. 2003; F´ejard et al. 2003). We used a broadening coefficient of 0.0613 cm−1 /atm (296/T)0.5 for CH3D colliding with a mixture of 86.3% H2 and 13.6% helium, as measured by the Galileo Probe (von Zahn et al. 1998). Pressure-induced H2 coefficients were ob- tained using laboratory measurements at 5 µm by Bachet et al. (1983) and the formalism developed by Birnbaum & Cohen (1976). The base of the model was set to 20 bars, 416K for the SEB Hot Spot to ensure that the base was well below the level where Jupiter's atmosphere becomes optically thick due to pressure-induced H2 opacity. For the zone at 32◦S, we investigated lower boundaries at 2, 4, 5, and 20 bars to simu- late opaque NH4SH clouds, H2O clouds, and no deep clouds in the troposphere. For the Hot Spot, we calculated a spectrum free of deep clouds for an emission angle of 18.7◦ and for an H2O mole frac- tion of 47 ppm for P > 4.5 bars as shown in Fig. 3, consistent with results from the Galileo Probe (Wong et al. 2004b). The model was iterated to fit CH3D (0.18 ppm) and PH3 (0.45 ppm). Our fit to CH3D in the Hot Spot is very close to the value (0.16±0.04 ppm) derived by Lellouch et al. (2001) using spectra at 8.6 µm from the In- frared Space Observatory. We then convolved the Jupiter spectrum to 0.02 cm−1 , doppler- shifted it by 25.2 km/sec, multiplied by the calcu- 5 lated transmittance above Mauna Kea, convolved it to 0.14 cm−1 to match the NIRSPEC data, and multiplied the spectrum by 0.332 to simu- late the transmission of upper cloud layers on Jupiter to match the observed continuum. As shown in Fig. 4, the synthetic spectrum fits Re- gion B, the SEB Hot Spot spectrum without any deep cloud opacity (P > 2 bars). All 4 CH3D fea- tures, including the wing between 2143.2 and 2143.6 cm−1 are matched. The zone model is more complicated. A ra- diative transfer model was used to calculate spec- tra for an emission angle of 33.4◦. Above each lower boundary, the gas composition was set to 0.18 ppm CH3D. For the zone model with no deep clouds, the Galileo Probe H2O profile was used. For models with opaque clouds at 2, 4, and 5 bars, a saturated profile of H2O was used (see Fig. 3). The mole fraction of PH3 was iterated to a value of 0.7 ppm to match the absorption fea- ture at 2143 cm−1 for lower boundaries at 4 and 5 bars. For the zone model without deep clouds, the PH3 abundance in the STZ was iterated to a value of 0.45 ppm. Thus, PH3 can also be used to discriminate between deep cloud models, as we describe below. A larger PH3 mole frac- tion (0.7 ppm) above an opaque cloud layer at 4 bars yields the same PH3 absorption as a smaller mole fraction (0.45 ppm) above the (deeper) level where the atmosphere becomes opaque due to H2- H2 opacity. The synthetic spectrum was split into two parts. The reflected solar component was cal- culated using the transmittances above a reflect- ing layer at 300 mbar and for an upper cloud re- flectance of 9%. It was convolved to 0.02 cm−1 res- olution, doppler-shifted, and multiplied by the ATMOS solar spectrum. The thermal component was convolved, doppler-shifted, and multiplied by transmittances of 0.393, 0.0269, 0.016, and 0.0038 for models with a base of 2, 4, 5, and 20 bars, re- spectively, and added to the reflected spectrum. This, in turn, was multiplied by the transmis- sion above Mauna Kea and finally convolved to 0.14 cm−1 resolution. Due to the numerous parameters in this model, we illustrate the parameter sensitivity of the model for the reflected solar and thermal com- ponents of the zone model separately in Fig. 5. We treat the reflective upper cloud as spectrally grey. Ice components such as NH3, NH4SH, 6 and H2O have been seen at other wavelengths (e.g., Brooke et al. (1998), Simon-Miller et al. (2000), Baines et al. (2002), Wong et al. (2004a), Sromovsky & Fry (2010)). However, our spec- tral windows do not include significant ice ab- sorption features. The imaginary indices of re- fraction of NH3 (Martonchik et al. 1984) and NH4SH (Howett et al. 2007) are on the order of 10−3 at the wavelengths studied here, much lower than values closer to unity at the ν3 vibra- tion transitions for these ices (at 3.0 and 3.4 µm, respectively). Thus, the spectral features in the reflected solar component are due to CH3D ab- sorption lines in the upper troposphere of Jupiter or Fraunhofer lines in the Sun. In the top panel of Fig. 5 we show 4 Fraunhofer lines, marked S. The strength of the strongest Jo- vian feature at 2141.8 cm−1 when compared with the spectrum of the Sun acquired by the ATMOS investigation yields the relative fractions of re- flected sunlight (0.43) and thermal emission (0.57) for this portion of Jupiter's South Tropical Zone. The fraction of reflected sunlight combined with the calibrated continuum level allows us to derive an upper cloud reflectance of 9%. There are 5 CH3D absorption features in this spectral range. Ammonia clouds and hazes limit the penetration of reflected sunlight to the upper troposphere. We investigated the pressure of the reflecting layer by calculating spectra at 100, 300, and 600 mbars. We adopted a value of 300 mbars for the STZ. Note that in order to match the narrow absorption cores of CH3D in a model that consists of the sum of two components, there are a family of solutions for the pressure level of the solar reflecting layer and for the thermal cloud top pressure. Increasing the pressure of the reflecting layer from 300 to 600 mbars may be compensated by, for example, de- creasing the (deep) cloud top pressure from 4 bars to 2 bars in the thermal component. However, we can exclude this possibility by studying the wing of the CH3D feature between 2143.2 and 2143.6 cm−1. The top panel shows that the reflected solar spectrum is flat over this range. In contrast, each thermal model has a different CH3D wing line slope. We now return to Fig. 4 which compares the sum of the reflected and thermal components of each model to the observed STZ spectrum. We can exclude models with an opaque NH4SH cloud at 2 bars (blue curve) as well as the model with no deep cloud (red curve). Note that the calculated radiances for both of these models lie well outside the error bars of the zone spectrum. The model with a deep cloud at 5 bars fits portions of the spectrum but the model with an opaque cloud at 4 bars (green curve) provides a better overall fit to the spectrum. The NIRSPEC spectral bandpass for Order 16 covers more than just this particular CH3D ab- sorption feature. In Fig. 6 we compare the STZ spectrum with the same zone models for a spec- tral region adjacent to the one displayed in Figs. 4 and 5. Here there are three telluric H2O lines. To the left of each telluric line is a Jovian water line red-shifted by 0.18 cm−1 due to the relative velocity of Jupiter with respect to the Earth. The wings of these water lines permit us to discrim- inate between models. The best fit requires an opaque cloud between 4 and 5 bars. Next, we compare our retrieved PH3 abun- dances in the 4 to 8-bar level of the STZ with measurements of PH3 at 1 bar from the Cassini flyby of Jupiter in January 2001. Irwin et al. (2004) retrieved PH3 mole fractions on Jupiter ranging from 0.9 to 1.5 ppm using zonal aver- ages of CIRS spectra at 9 µm between 60◦S and 60◦N. The retrieved PH3 mole fraction at 32◦S was 1.0±0.2 ppm. Phosphine falls off with height in the upper troposphere due to ultraviolet pho- tolysis, but its mole fraction is not expected to change between 1 and 8 bars. There remain dis- crepancies between PH3 retrievals at 5 and 9 µm (Fletcher et al. 2009). Nevertheless, better agreement for the abundance of PH3 at 32◦S is achieved for a model with opaque clouds near 4 to 5 bars (0.7 ppm) than for a zone model with no deep cloud (0.45 ppm). Thus, using three independent arguments that are based on: a) the slope of the CH3D line wings, b) the slope of the H2O line wings, and c) the derived mole fractions of PH3, we conclude that there must be significant cloud opacity between 4 and 5 bars in the STZ at 32◦S. Based on the tem- peratures at these pressure levels (257K to 275K), thermochemical models predict that this is a water cloud. In Fig. 7 we compare the spectrum of the SEB Hot Spot marked B at 2016 cm−1 (4.96 µm) with 3 different models calculated using the vertical pro- files of H2O shown in Fig. 3. The parameters 7 are the same as those used to fit the spectrum at 2144 cm−1 except for H2O and NH3. We initially used a vertical profile of NH3 derived from ab- sorption of the radio signal from the Galileo Probe (Folkner et al. (1998) as modified by Hanley et al. (2009)). We found that a scaling factor of 2 was required to fit the NH3 absorption features shown in Fig. 7. This corresponds to NH3 mole frac- tions ranging from 240 ppm at 2 bars to 600 ppm at 4.5 bars. This is significantly larger than val- ues derived from ground-based microwave observa- tions (see Sault et al. (2004)). However, we have not used the much stronger absorption features in Order 14 (5.3 µm) to constrain the NH3 ver- tical profile. Thus, the NH3 mole fractions re- ported here should be regarded as preliminary. The three different vertical profiles of H2O in Fig. 3, and used in our calculations, were based on the mass spectrometer data on the Galileo Probe. Niemann et al. (1998) reported an upper limit to H2O of 0.8 ppm at 2.7 bars. Wong et al. (2004b) reported a mole fraction of H2O of 40±13 ppm at 11.0-11.7 bars on Jupiter. The only adjustable pa- rameter in our model was the pressure at which the H2O mole fraction increased from 0.8 to 47 ppm, as shown in Fig. 3. The best fit is for a pressure of 4.5 bars. Assuming that the SEB Hot Spot is similar to the one that Galileo entered, this data point provides a useful measurement of the depth at which dynamical processes have dried out Hot Spots on Jupiter. This depth compares well with the depth determined by Sault et al. (2004) for the NH3 abundance in hot spots from microwave ob- servations. We next modeled the zone marked A at 2016 cm−1. We used the same procedure as was used to model the zone spectrum at 2144 cm−1. We explored the same set of models with cloud tops at 2, 4, and 5 bars, as well as the model with no deep cloud. This portion of Jupiter's spectrum is not sensitive to the deep cloud structure. Using the results from fitting CH3D, we adopted a model with an opaque cloud top at 4.0 bars and a satu- rated H2O profile above. The NH3 mole fraction was iterated until a rough fit was achieved using a value of 250 ppm between 0.75 and 4.0 bars and a saturated value for P < 0.75 bars. Without any obvious Fraunhofer lines in this spectral re- gion to constrain the reflected solar component, we assumed the same upper cloud reflectance of 9% as at 2144 cm−1 and we obtained an upper cloud transmittance of 0.0542. The transmittance is therefore less certain than the value derived at 2144 cm−1. The principal conclusion from this spectral region is that the observed H2O line profiles in the STZ are slightly broader than the telluric H2O features, but narrower than H2O fea- tures in the SEB Hot Spot. A saturated H2O pro- file for P < 4.0 bars provides a satisfactory fit to the observed spectrum. 1.0 2.0 ) s r a b ( e r u s s e r P 5.0 10.0 Water Vapor Vertical Profiles Galileo Upper Limit Saturated Profile SEB Hot Spot Profiles Galileo Probe 20.0 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 H2O mole fraction Fig. 3. -- Vertical profiles of H2O used to calculate syn- thetic spectra in Figures 4 and 5. 8 Sensitivity to Cloud Top Pressure Level 1.4 10-7 1.2 10-7 ) 1 - m c / 1 - r s 2 - m c t t a W ( e c n a d a R i t o p S t o H 6.0 10-8 4.0 10-8 2.0 10-8 1.0 10-7 8.0 10-8 0.0 S PH3 Zone 32oS A Cloud 2 bars Cloud 4 bars Cloud 5 bars No deep cloud B Hot Spot 17oS No deep cloud Mauna Kea Trans 2142.0 2143.0 H2O T 2145.0 2146.0 CH3D 2144.0 Wavenumber (cm-1) 2.5 10-9 2.0 10-9 1.5 10-9 1.0 10-9 5.0 10-10 Z o n e 0.0 Fig. 4. -- The pressure level of deep clouds on Jupiter as constrained by CH3D line profiles observed in Order 16. An SEB Hot Spot (gray curve) at 17◦S (labeled B in Fig. 1) is fitted without any clouds at pressures greater than 2 bars (pink curve). Hot Spot error bars would be smaller than the thickness of the gray curve. The spectrum of the STZ at 32◦S (points with error bars, and labeled A in Fig. 1) was modeled using opaque clouds at 2, 4, 5 bars and a model without any deep clouds. We may exclude an opaque NH4SH cloud at 2 bars due to the poor fit of the blue curve to the observed spectrum. The best fit requires an opaque cloud between 4 and 5 bars. Thermochemical models predict that cloud opacity at this pressure level is due to a water cloud. Note the factor of 50 difference in radiance scales between the Hot Spot and the zone spectra. The calculated transmittance above Mauna Kea for 2 mm precip H2O is shown as a dashed blue line. T denotes a telluric H2O line and S denotes a solar (Fraunhofer) line. 9 Reflected Solar Component of South Tropical Zone PH3 S S S S CH3D CH3D CH3D CH3D CH3D Zone 32oS A Reflect 100 mbar Reflect 300 mbar Reflect 600 mbar T H2O 2142.0 2143.0 2144.0 2145.0 2146.0 Wavenumber (cm-1) Thermal Component of South Tropical Zone PH3 CH3D CH3D CH3D CH3D T H2O Zone 32oS A Cloud Top 2 bars Cloud Top 4 bars Cloud Top 5 bars No Deep Cloud 1.0 10-9 5.0 10-10 0.0 R e f l e c t e d R a d i a n c e 1.5 10-9 1.0 10-9 5.0 10-10 0.0 T h e r m a l i R a d a n c e i e c n a d a R e n o Z l a c i p o r T h t u o S i e c n a d a R e n o Z l i a c p o r T h t u o S 2.5 10-9 2.0 10-9 1.5 10-9 1.0 10-9 5.0 10-10 0.0 2.5 10-9 2.0 10-9 1.5 10-9 1.0 10-9 5.0 10-10 0.0 2142.0 2143.0 2144.0 2145.0 2146.0 Wavenumber (cm-1) Fig. 5. -- Top: The reflected solar component of a radiative transfer model of the STZ at 32◦S. Four Fraunhofer lines are marked as S. A telluric H2O line is marked as T. A reflecting layer is placed at 100, 300, and 600 mbars in Jupiter's upper troposphere. One PH3 and five CH3D lines are shown. The narrow cores of the CH3D lines are sensitive to the solar component. Bottom: The thermal component is shown for models with cloud tops at 2, 4, and 5 bars, and for a model with no deep cloud. The wing of CH3D between 2143.2 and 2143.6 cm−1 and the PH3 line at 2143.0 cm−1 are due to the thermal component. Radiance scales are offset to match the continuum of the observed spectrum. 10 2.5 10-9 2.0 10-9 1.5 10-9 1.0 10-9 5.0 10-10 0.0 ) 1 - m c / 1 - r s 2 - m c t t a W ( e c n a d a R i Sensitivity to Cloud Top Pressure Level S H2O H2O T H2O H2O T H2O A Zone 32oS Cloud Top 2 bars Cloud Top 4 bars Cloud Top 5 bars No Deep Cloud T H2O 2137.0 2138.0 2139.0 2140.0 2141.0 2142.0 Wavenumber (cm-1) Fig. 6. -- The spectrum of the STZ at 32◦S and radiative transfer models with opaque clouds at 2, 4, and 5 bars, and a model without any deep clouds are shown for a spectral region adjacent to the CH3D features. T denotes telluric H2O lines and S denotes a solar (Fraunhofer) line. Note the 3 Jovian H2O lines red-shifted by 0.18 cm−1 from their telluric counterparts. The wings of these water lines permit us to discriminate between models. The best fit requires an opaque cloud between 4 and 5 bars. 11 Sensitivity to Water Vapor Vertical Profile A Zone 32oS H2O Sat P<4.0 bars 1.6 10-7 ) 1 - m c / 1 - r s 2 - m c t t a W 1.2 10-7 8.0 10-8 ( e c n a d a R i 4.0 10-8 t o p S t o H 0.0 NH3 H2O H2O H2O B NH3 Hot Spot 17oS H2O Gal P>3.5 bars H2O Gal P>4.0 bars H2O Gal P>4.5 bars Mauna Kea Trans 2012.0 2014.0 2016.0 2018.0 2020.0 Wavenumber (cm-1) 3.5 10-9 3.0 10-9 2.5 10-9 PH3 2.0 10-9 1.5 10-9 1.0 10-9 5.0 10-10 0.0 Z o n e R a d Fig. 7. -- Vertical profiles of water vapor mixing ratio as constrained by H2O line profiles observed in Order 15. An SEB Hot Spot (Region B, gray curve) at 17◦S is fitted without any deep clouds. Hot Spot error bars would be smaller than the thickness of the gray curve. Three vertical profiles of H2O were calculated for the Hot Spot. The best fit used the Galileo Probe value for H2O for pressures greater than 4.5 bars (see also Fig. 3). The spectrum of the STZ at 32◦S (Region A, points with error bars) was fitted using an opaque cloud at 4 bars and a saturated H2O profile above it (purple curve). The H2O lines in the zone are slightly broader than the telluric features, but much narrower than in the Hot Spot. 12 Latitudinal Variation 4.66 µm Flux CH3D Eq Width Fraction Reflected Solar Possible Water Clouds Possible Water Clouds Possible Water Clouds No Opaque Water Clouds Thick Upper Clouds No Opaque Water Clouds NEB Hot Confirmed No Opaque Water Clouds SEB Hot B A Confirmed Water Cloud Thick Upper Clouds Possible Water Clouds Possible Water Clouds No Opaque Water Clouds 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 -20.0 -40.0 -60.0 e d u t i t a L c i h p a r g o t e n a l P 0.0 0.2 0.4 Normalized Quantity 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Fig. 8. -- The flux at 4.66 µm (red curve), the equivalent width of CH3D (black curve), and the the ratio of the equivalent width of the Fraunhofer line at 2141.8 cm−1 on Jupiter to that in the Sun is shown for each latitude along the central meridian on Jupiter. Hot Spots are present at 8.5◦N and 17◦S. Latitudes exhibiting minima in CH3D equivalent widths are candidates for water clouds. Radiative transfer models were used to match a zone spectrum at 32◦S (marked "A") and a Hot Spot spectrum at 17◦S (marked "B"). The gold curve indicates the fraction due to reflected sunlight. Large values imply thick upper clouds that attenuate thermal radiation from below and reflect sunlight above. The bar on the right denotes haze reflectivity variation with latitude obtained from 2.12 µm SCAM images, roughly similar to belt-zone structure seen at visible wavelengths. 13 4. DISCUSSION This paper describes a technique to determine water cloud heights using spectrally-resolved line shapes of CH3D. We have demonstrated with a set of spectra from characteristic spatial regions that variation in the water cloud height manifests as a variation in the equivalent width of CH3D. This technique can be applied to all regions covered by the spectrometer slit. We show the CH3D equiv- alent width as a function of latitude (black curve) in Fig. 8, highlighting the latitude regions which may have water clouds. The observations are ex- tremely valuable both for understanding Jupiter's atmospheric circulation, as well as its bulk water abundance (a constraint on planetary formation scenarios). However, the equivalent width of CH3D alone In order to map H2O clouds is not sufficient. on Jupiter, we need to measure the latitudinal profile of both CH3D line shapes as well as the strength of the Fraunhofer line at 2141.8 cm−1. In Fig. 8 we plot three quantities as a function of latitude on Jupiter. First is the radiance inte- grated over the 4.6-µm bandpass and normalized to 1.0 as a function of spatial pixel and converted to planetographic latitude. This is shown in red. The next quantity is the equivalent width of our set of CH3D absorption lines integrated between 2143.21 and 2145.04 cm−1(denoted by the hori- zontal bar in Fig. 2). This is shown in black. The last quantity plotted in Fig. 8 is the fraction of reflected sunlight as a function of latitude. This was obtained by measuring the equivalent width of the Fraunhofer line at 2141.8 cm−1 as a func- tion of latitude and dividing it by the value in the Sun as measured by ATMOS. At latitudes such as 23◦N where this value is close to 1.0, there is in- sufficient thermal flux to constrain the deep cloud structure. However, by using adjacent latitudes where CH3D equivalent widths are also small, and where the fraction of reflected solar flux < 0.6, we can infer the presence of water clouds. Thus, we have indicated "possible water clouds" for the en- tire region where values of CH3D equivalent width are small. The vertical bar on the right denotes the brightness of Jupiter in reflected sunlight at 2.12 µm obtained from SCAM images navigated onto a planetographic latitude grid. This wave- length sounds hazes in the upper troposphere and illustrates Jupiter's belt-zone structure. The equivalent width of CH3D is sensitive to two parameters: the fraction of reflected sunlight and the pressure level of the deep cloud. Consider two regions on Jupiter. They both lack an opaque water cloud, but one has thin upper clouds so that the 5-µm spectrum is 100% thermal. The other has a thick, reflective upper cloud that attenuates the thermal component yielding a spectrum that is 50% thermal and 50% reflected solar. In the latter case, the contribution of the reflected solar continuum will significantly reduce the equivalent width of the CH3D absorption features that are present in the thermal component. A low value of CH3D equivalent width might be interpreted as due to a deep water cloud, whereas in this case the small equivalent width was due solely to the presence of the solar component from an upper reflective layer. Thus, we have to be cautious in using the equivalent width of CH3D alone to in- fer deep cloud structure. Nevertheless, the data plotted in Figure 8 show interesting structure at latitudes where the fraction of reflected solar radi- ation is essentially zero. High latitudes, southward of 55◦S and northward of 35◦N show interesting variations in CH3D equivalent widths that can- not be attributed to reflected sunlight and thus are related to deep cloud structure. With the caveat that radiative transfer mod- eling is required to verify the presence of wa- ter clouds in regions with small CH3D equiva- lent widths and significant fractions of reflected sunlight, we can make the following conclusions: Where thick water clouds are present at pres- sures in the 3-5 bar range, the CH3D equiva- lent width is small, and the black curve (Fig. 8) tends toward lower values. Regions with thick, high-altitude (P ≤ 4 bars) water clouds can be associated with widespread upwelling, since down- welling would provide the opposite effect of clear- ing cloud opacity via sublimation. We find the smallest CH3D equivalent widths in the three low- latitude zones: the equatorial zone and the north and south tropical zones. This implies a large ver- tical extent to the upwelling responsible for form- ing the thick white clouds observed in zones at optical wavelengths. Thick water clouds in zones specifically con- tradict models of inverted two-layer circulation within the tropospheric cloud decks. Ingersoll et al. 14 (2000) and Showman & de Pater (2005) suggested inverted two-layer circulation schemes to explain widespread ammonia gas depletion even in zones. In this type of circulation model, regions of up- welling (thick clouds) in the visible upper levels (NH3+ NH4SH cloud decks) corresponds to down- welling at the deeper, hidden water cloud level. Our results suggest that mass flux into the upper cloud layers of zones is not dominated by hori- zontal transport, as in the Showman & de Pater scenario, but is driven by vertical transport from below. Jupiter's circulation in zones therefore maintains the same sign of upwelling/downwelling across the full 0.5-5 bar weather layer. The same sign of upwelling/downwelling over this large an extent was also derived by de Pater et al. (2010) from 5-micron bright rings around vortices. These authors suggested that vortices must extend ver- tically from at least the 4-7 bar level up to the tropopause. Large CH3D equivalent width requires low wa- ter cloud opacity. Subsidence of dry upper-level air provides the simplest mechanism. Figure 8 shows that at low latitudes, the clearest deep at- mosphere (high values of the black curve) occur where the 5-µm flux is highest (red curve). The very highest flux levels correspond to an atmo- sphere largely devoid of clouds of all three types, H2O, NH3, and NH4SH, again suggesting down- welling circulation that spans the full 0.5-5 bar range at least. However, the width (in latitude) of the 5-µm flux peak is very narrow, compared to the width of the NEB/SEB regions with low water cloud opacity. Thus, over a broad latitude range with little or no water cloud opacity, the atmo- sphere is characterized by both cloudy and cloud- free conditions at the upper levels. Perhaps a two- layer circulation model with a vertical flow reversal layer between the water and NH3/ NH4SH clouds can be relevant on these regional scales, if not for the entire planet. The rapid "fading" or whitening of the South Equatorial Belt between 2008 and 2010 was in- terpreted by Fletcher et al. (2011) as due to en- hanced upwelling of ammonia-rich air followed by condensation. Using CH3D line profiles and ab- sorption lines of NH3 and H2O in the 5-µm win- dow, we now have the capability of measuring cloud structure and volatile abundances in the NEB and SEB at the 4 to 8 bar level. Any fu- ture changes in the appearance of the belts can now be investigated over the full 0.5 to 8-bar range of Jupiter's troposphere using spectroscopy at 4.6 and 8.6 µm. By studying changes in each cloud layer separately we will have a much better un- derstanding of the dynamics below Jupiter's visi- ble clouds. The high latitudes also show high CH3D equiv- alent widths. Here, more detailed modeling will be needed to disentangle geometric effects caused by viewing geometry, as well as changes in at- mospheric scale height in a rapidly-rotating non- spherical planet. But the data do suggest a differ- ent paradigm in deep cloud structure at high lat- itudes (polewards of 40◦). We note, though, that 5-micron images at high spatial resolution show a lot of structure at these latitudes (de Pater et al. 2011), and microwave images show an overall low NH3 abundance (de Pater 1986). A combination of 5-µm imaging, microwave imaging, and 5- µm spectroscopy of Jupiter's polar regions would be extremely useful to investigate these interesting cloud features. We now return to the interpretation of 5- µm spectra of Jupiter acquired by the KAO, Voyager/IRIS, and Galileo/NIMS. It now seems clear that the airborne observations of Jupiter were flux-weighted by Hot Spots. The abun- dances of H2O and other molecules derived by Bjoraker et al. (1986a,b) pertain to Hot Spots, but not to Jupiter as a whole. The lower bound- ary for Hot Spots is in fact due to pressure-induced H2 opacity, rather than an opaque water cloud, as proposed by Carlson et al. (1992). However, the model proposed by Carlson et al. does ap- pear to apply to Jupiter's zones, at least in the regions marked in Fig. 8 as candidates for wa- ter clouds. Similarly, models of Galileo/NIMS spectra of the Equatorial Zone by Drossart et al. (1998) are probably accurate while models of Hot Spots that included water clouds (e.g. Nixon et al. (2001)) will need to be revised. This technique provides a constraint on Jupiter's deep water abundance and therefore its O/H ra- tio. The base of the water cloud is sensitive to the abundance of water because higher abundances lead to condensation at deeper levels. The data provide the level of the cloud top, not the cloud base. Since the top is at higher altitude than the base, cloud top constraints provide lower limits to 15 the pressure of the cloud base, or, lower limits to the deep abundance of water. A spectrum requir- ing a water cloud at P ≥ 5 bar would establish a supersolar enrichment of water in Jupiter, better constraining planetary formation models (Wong et al. 2008). Figure 4 shows the effect of water cloud pres- sure level on model fits to a cloudy zone spec- trum at 32◦S. The spectrum is best fit by a water cloud with a top between 4-5 bars. The cloud base is therefore found at P > 4 − 5 bar. Fol- lowing Fig. 1 in Wong et al. (2008), a cloud base at 4-5 bar corresponds to O/H ratios 0.33-1.1× solar (corrected to the new solar O/H ratio of As- plund et al. 2009). Our observations thus pro- vide a lower limit to Jupiter's water abundance of 0.33-1.1× solar. This result is consistent with the Galileo Probe lower limit of 0.48±0.16× solar (Wong et al. 2004), and therefore does not provide any new constraint on the water abundance. In fu- ture work, we will search for spectra that require an even deeper water cloud. Knowledge of the deep cloud structure permits us to retrieve abundances of H2O, NH3, and other 5-µm absorbers more accurately. This will enable studies of dynamics below Jupiter's visible cloud layers. Additional observations will permit us to observe discrete cloud features such as the Great Red Spot and Oval BA. The data presented were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a sci- entific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administra- tion. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. The authors extend special thanks to those of Hawaiian ancestry on whose sacred mountain we are privileged to be guests. Without their generous hospitality, none of the observa- tions presented would have been possible. We also would like to thank Linda Brown for steering us to the latest broadening coefficients for CH3D. This research was supported by the NASA Plan- etary Astronomy (PAST) Program grant number NNX11AJ47G, NNX14AJ43G, NNX15AJ41G, and NASA Outer Planets Research Program grant number NNX11AM55G. Facilities: Keck Observatory, Voyager (IRIS). 16 REFERENCES Adriani, A., Filacchione, G., Di Iorio, T., et al. 2014, Space Sci. Rev., doi:10.1007/s11214-014- 0094-y Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481 Bachet, G., Cohen, E. R., Dore, P., & Birnbaum, G. 1983, Canadian Journal of Physics, 61, 591 Baines, K. H., Carlson, R. W., & Kamp, L. W. 2002, Icarus, 159, 74 Birnbaum, G., & Cohen, E. R. 1976, Canadian Journal of Physics, 54, 593 Bjoraker, G. L., Hewagama, T., & Orton, G. S. 2002, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 34, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #34, 874 Bjoraker, G. L., Larson, H. P., & Kunde, V. G. 1986a, ApJ, 311, 1058 -- . 1986b, Icarus, 66, 579 Boussin, C., Lutz, B. L., Hamdounia, A., & de Bergh, C. 1999, J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf., 63, 49 Brooke, T. Y., Knacke, R. F., Encrenaz, T., et al. 1998, Icarus, 136, 1 Carlson, B. E., Lacis, A. A., & Rossow, W. B. 1992, ApJ, 388, 648 de Pater, I. 1986, Icarus, 68, 344 de Pater, I., DeBoer, D., Marley, M., Freedman, R., & Young, R. 2005, Icarus, 173, 425 de Pater, I., Wong, M. H., de Kleer, K., et al. 2011, Icarus, 213, 559 de Pater, I., Wong, M. H., Marcus, P., et al. 2010, Icarus, 210, 742 Drossart, P., Roos-Serote, M., Encrenaz, T., et al. 1998, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 23043 Farmer, C. B. 1994, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 154, Infrared Solar Physics, ed. D. M. Rabin, J. T. Jefferies, & C. Lindsey, 511 Farmer, C. B., & Norton, R. H. 1989, A high- resolution atlas of the infrared spectrum of the sun and the earth atmosphere from space. A compilation of ATMOS spectra of the region from 650 to 4800 cm−1 (2.3 to 16 µm). Vol. I. The sun. F´ejard, L., Gabard, T., & Champion, J.-P. 2003, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 219, 88 Fletcher, L. N., Orton, G. S., Teanby, N. A., & Irwin, P. G. J. 2009, Icarus, 202, 543 Lerot, C., Walrand, J., Blanquet, G., Bouanich, J.-P., & Lep`ere, M. 2003, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 219, 329 Martonchik, J. V., Orton, G. S., & Appleby, J. F. 1984, Appl. Opt., 23, 541 McLean, I. S., Becklin, E. E., Bendiksen, O., et al. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumenta- tion Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3354, Infrared Astronomical Instrumentation, ed. A. M. Fowler, 566 -- 578 Fletcher, L. N., Orton, G. S., Rogers, J. H., et al. Niemann, H. B., Harpold, D. N., Atreya, S. K., 2011, Icarus, 213, 564 et al. 1992, Space Sci. Rev., 60, 111 Folkner, W. M., Woo, R., & Nandi, S. 1998, Niemann, H. B., Atreya, S. K., Carignan, G. R., J. Geophys. Res., 103, 22847 et al. 1998, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 22831 Friedson, A. J. 2005, Icarus, 177, 1 Hanley, T. R., Steffes, P. G., & Karpowicz, B. M. 2009, Icarus, 202, 316 Hersant, F., Gautier, D., & Lunine, J. I. 2004, Planet. Space Sci., 52, 623 Howett, C. J. A., Carlson, R. W., Irwin, P. G. J., & Calcutt, S. B. 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America B Optical Physics, 24, 126 Ingersoll, A. P., Gierasch, P. J., Banfield, D., Vasavada, A. R., & Galileo Imaging Team. 2000, Nature, 403, 630 Irwin, P. G. J., Parrish, P., Fouchet, T., et al. Nikitin, A., Champion, J. P., Tyuterev, V. G., & Brown, L. R. 1997, Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy, 184, 120 Nixon, C. A., Irwin, P. G. J., Calcutt, S. B., Tay- lor, F. W., & Carlson, R. W. 2001, Icarus, 150, 48 Orton, G., Ortiz, J. L., Baines, K., et al. 1996, Science, 272, 839 Ragent, B., Colburn, D. S., Rages, K. A., et al. 1998, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 22891 Roos-Serote, M., Atreya, S. K., Wong, M. K., & Drossart, P. 2004, Planet. Space Sci., 52, 397 2004, Icarus, 172, 37 Sault, R. J., Engel, C., & de Pater, I. 2004, Icarus, Jacquinet-Husson, N., Scott, N. A., Chedin, A., et al. 2005, Journal of Quantitative Spec- troscopy and Radiative Transfer, 95, 429 168, 336 Showman, A. P., & de Pater, I. 2005, Icarus, 174, 192 Janssen, M. A., Hofstadter, M. D., Gulkis, S., Simon-Miller, A. A., Conrath, B., Gierasch, P. J., et al. 2005, Icarus, 173, 447 & Beebe, R. F. 2000, Icarus, 145, 454 Kunde, V. R., & Maguire, W. C. 1974, Jour- nal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 14, 803 Sromovsky, L. A., & Fry, P. M. 2010, Icarus, 210, 230 Weidenschilling, S. J., & Lewis, J. S. 1973, Icarus, Larson, H. P., Fink, U., Treffers, R., & Gautier, 20, 465 III, T. N. 1975, ApJ, 197, L137 Lellouch, E., B´ezard, B., Fouchet, T., et al. 2001, A&A, 370, 610 Wong, M. H., Atreya, S. K., Kuhn, W. R., Ro- mani, P. N., & Mihalka, K. M. 2015, Icarus, 245, 273 17 Wong, M. H., Bjoraker, G. L., Smith, M. D., Flasar, F. M., & Nixon, C. A. 2004a, Planet. Space Sci., 52, 385 Wong, M. H., Lunine, J., Atreya, S. K., et al. 2008, in Oxygen in the Solar System, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, ed. MacPher- son, G. J., Mittlefehldt, D. W., Jones, J. & Si- mon, S. B., Vol. 68, 219 -- 246 Wong, M. H., Mahaffy, P. R., Atreya, S. K., Nie- mann, H. B., & Owen, T. C. 2004b, Icarus, 171, 153 This 2-column preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. 18
1910.04720	1	1910	2019-10-10T17:24:52	Doubly Synchronous Binary Asteroid Mass Parameter Observability	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The full two-body problem (F2BP) is often used to model binary asteroid systems, representing the bodies as two finite mass distributions whose dynamics are influenced by their mutual gravity potential. The emergent behavior of the F2BP is highly coupled translational and rotational mutual motion of the mass distributions. A large fraction of characterized binary asteroids appear to be at, or near, the doubly synchronous equilibrium, which occurs when both bodies are tidally-locked and in a circular co-orbit. Stable oscillations about this equilibrium can be shown, for the nonplanar system, to be combinations of seven fundamental frequencies of the system and the mutual orbit rate. The fundamental frequencies arise as the linear periods of center manifolds identified about the equilibrium which are heavily influenced by each body's mass parameters. We leverage these eight dynamical constraints to investigate the observability of binary asteroid mass parameters via dynamical observations. This is accomplished by deriving a relationship between the fundamental frequencies and mass parameters for doubly synchronous systems. This relationship allows us to show the sensitivity of the dynamics to changes in the mass parameters, first for the planar dynamics, and then for the nonplanar dynamics. In so doing we are able to predict the idealized estimation covariance of the mass parameters based on observation quality and define idealized observation accuracies for desired mass parameter certainties. We apply these tools to 617 Patroclus, a doubly synchronous Trojan binary and flyby target of the LUCY mission, as well as the Pluto and Charon system in order to predict mutual behavior	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Doubly Synchronous Binary Asteroid Mass Parameter Observability$ Alex B. Davisa,∗, Daniel J. Scheeresa aDepartment of Aerospace Engineering Science, University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309, United States Abstract The full two-body problem (F2BP) is often used to model binary asteroid sys- tems, representing the bodies as two finite mass distributions whose dynamics are influenced by their mutual gravity potential. The emergent behavior of the F2BP is highly coupled translational and rotational mutual motion of the mass distributions. A large fraction of characterized binary asteroids appear to be at, or near, the doubly synchronous equilibrium, which occurs when both bodies are tidally-locked and in a circular co-orbit. Stable oscil- lations about this equilibrium can be shown, for the nonplanar system, to be combinations of seven fundamental frequencies of the system and the mutual orbit rate. The fundamental frequencies arise as the linear periods of cen- ter manifolds identified about the equilibrium which are heavily influenced by each body's mass parameters. We leverage these eight dynamical con- straints to investigate the observability of binary asteroid mass parameters via dynamical observations. This is accomplished by deriving a relationship between the fundamental frequencies and mass parameters for doubly syn- chronous systems. This relationship allows us to show the sensitivity of the dynamics to changes in the mass parameters, first for the planar dynamics, and then for the nonplanar dynamics. In so doing we are able to predict the idealized estimation covariance of the mass parameters based on obser- $This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grad- uate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE 1650115. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. ∗Corresponding author Email addresses: [email protected] (Alex B. Davis), [email protected] (Daniel J. Scheeres) Preprint submitted to Icarus October 11, 2019 vation quality and define idealized observation accuracies for desired mass parameter certainties. We apply these tools to 617 Patroclus, a doubly syn- chronous Trojan binary and flyby target of the LUCY mission, as well as the Pluto and Charon system in order to predict mutual behaviors of these doubly synchronous systems and to provide observational requirements for these systems mass parameters. Keywords: Asteroids, dynamics, Asteroids, rotation, Satellites of asteroids, 1. Introduction In the past three decades binary asteroids have been discovered through- out the solar system and are believed to make up a significant portion of many small body populations. Observers have identified 48 transneptunian binaries and place binaries at approximately 16% of near-Earth asteroids (NEAs); the majority of equal mass binaries in these populations are ex- plected to be doubly synchronous[1][2][3]. Radar observations of Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs), such as 1999 KW4 and 65803 Didymos, have generated shape models for a number of these bodies. Such information provides a basis for the application of the full two-body problem (F2BP) to study the behavior of these systems[4][5]. The F2BP describes the dynamical inter- actions of two mass distributions, which result in coupled translational and rotational motion due to the mutual gravity potential between asymmet- ric mass distributions. The dynamics, stability and the effects of mass and spin for the F2BP have been studied extensively by Maciejewski, Tricario, Scheeres, and Boue and Laskar amongst others[6][7][8][9]. Work by Fahne- stock and Scheeres implemented a polyhedral formulation of the F2BP dy- namics to simulate the behavior of 1999 KW4 based on a series of radar observations[4]. Later work by Naidu adapted the inertia integral implemen- tation of the F2BP developed by Ashenberg to study the spin behavior of a sampling of 10 well-observed binary NEAs[5][10]. Both studies provided valuable insight into the dynamical behavior of binaries, however they were limited by the computational burden or limited expansion order inherent to their implementation of the F2BP. Recently Hou et al. derived a recursive approach to the F2BP which enables much more computationally efficient simulation of the F2BP[11]. The improvements in computationally efficiency also open the door to study mass distribution sensitivity of binary system dynamics. 2 As observers continue to study binary systems in more detail it is impor- tant to understand how their mass parameters may influence the observed dynamics and affect assumptions made about the system behavior. We ana- lyze these effects by applying estimation techniques based on idealized obser- vations of the translational and rotational coupling inherent in a doubly syn- chronous binary system. Such an approach, while unprecedented for binary asteroids, has been leveraged during missions to small bodies and asteroid flybys of the Earth. Most notably, Takahashi and Scheeres used observations of the spin state of 4179 Toutatis during several Earth flybys to estimate its moments of inertia[12]. At Vesta the Dawn mission was able to use the spacecraft's orbital behavior to place constraints on the interior structure and mass distribution of Vesta and similar plans have been made for the OSIRIS-Rex mission to Bennu[13][14]. Development of these capabilities for binaries would enable more reliable measurements and more robust mission planning for upcoming missions to binary asteroids, such as the LUCY mis- sion which will fly by the 617 Patroclus binary system and the AIDA mission which will impact and observe 65803 Didymos. In this paper we leverage a new formulation of the F2BP dynamics devel- oped in Hou et al. to explore the ideal observability of binary asteroids mass parameters from observations of the dynamics. The Hou formulation of the F2BP is selected because its recursive form provides improved computation speed and ease of manipulation[11]. To understand the sensitivity of the binary systems to mass parameters we study the observability of each mass parameter. To maintain simplicity of the investigation the simulated binary system is assumed to be in or oscillating near a doubly synchronous equilib- rium, meaning both bodies are near tidally locked in a relaxed orbit about their mutual center of mass. We also assume knowledge of the center of mass and principal axes of the target bodies so as to better study the direct effects of the mass parameters themselves on the observable dynamics. Thus, this paper provides ideal limits on the observability of the mass parameters based purely on observations of a binary system's mutual motion. Our analysis is primarily applied to the 617 Patroclus system, a Trojan asteroid believed to be a near equal mass doubly synchronous binary system made up of two nearly ellipsoidal bodies. 617 Patroclus thus represents a realistic manifestation of the doubly synchronous assumptions made in this dynamical analysis. Additionally as a flyby target for the LUCY mission, this binary has been the target of a number of recent observation campaigns. The physical parameters describing 617 Patroclus implemented for this study 3 Table 1: Physical Properties of The Doubly Synchronous 617 Patroclus modeled in this study Density ρ [kg/m−3] 881 Primary Secondary Orbit a [km] b [km] 63.5 58.5 c [km] 49 a [km] b [km] 58.5 54 c [km] 45 r [km] Period [days] 664.6 4.41 are listed in Table 1 and based on the results of the 2013 stellar occultation study performed by Buie et al. In line with the analysis of Buie et al. we as- sume the system to be homogenous of constant density[15]. Additionally, we apply this technique to the Pluto-Charon system, exploring its applicability to near-spherical systems. In this paper, we will first rigorously define the F2BP, the mutual gravity potential and the doubly synchronous equilibrium. With this information we explore the dynamics of the planar form of the F2BP; analyzing the fun- damental frequencies of the planar dynamics and their observability. This analysis is then expanded to the nonplanar form of the dynamics and an ide- alized mass parameter estimation method is developed and explored. Finally, we examine the case of near-spherical binaries by applying our methods to the Pluto-Charon system. Throughout the paper we refer to observations of a binary system's fun- damental frequencies, which we assume come from an idealized fictitious observer. The fictitious observer is imagined to receive regular resolved im- ages of the system of interest, such that the dynamics associated with each fundamental frequency can be explicitly measured. The reasons for this ap- proach are twofold. Firstly, this approach allows us to perform a best-case analysis and provide an upper bound of what is achievable with the described methodology. Secondly, it allows us to avoid systemic and stochastic errors from a given measurement type, such as the effect of uncertainty in shape and surface properties on light curve data, which we view to be outside the scope of this work. 2. The Full Two-Body Problem In order to model the dynamics of binary asteroids we implement a simu- lation of the F2BP. The F2BP describes the mutual gravitational interactions between two arbitrary mass distributions, as illustrated in Fig. 1. To model the mutual gravity of the mass distributions the influence of each infinitesi- 4 mal mass element of both bodies on all other mass elements in the opposing body must be accounted for. The self gravitational potential is ignored in this implementation of the F2BP as both bodies are assumed to be rigid for the time scales of interest and thus their self potentials are constant. The generic form of the mutual gravity potential is a double volume integral over both mass distributions, where d is the the distance between an finite mass element of the primary, dmA, and the secondary, dmB. 1 d dmAdmB (1) A B (cid:90) (cid:90) U = −G Figure 1: Diagram of initial system geometry. x represents the principal frame of the primary, A, x(cid:48) is the principal frame of the secondary, B, and n is the inertial frame. The finite mass elements dmA and dmB must be integrated over the full body using their locations relative to the body centers of mass, (cid:126)ρ and (cid:126)ρ(cid:48), to compute the mass parameters and mutual gravity potential. In the Hou et al. reformulation the mutual gravity potential is expressed as a function of the relative separation magnitude, R, and the attitude of the two approximately modeled asteroids, C A and C B; where the attitude matrices represent a mapping from the indicated body's principal frame into the inertial frame. At the second degree and order of the mass distribution, the mutual potential is: 5 𝒙"𝒙"′𝒗𝑨𝑩𝝎𝝎′𝒏"𝟏𝒏"𝟐𝒏"𝟑𝒓𝝆𝝆′𝒅𝒎1𝒅𝒎2𝒅(cid:16) − G 2R3 U = −GMAMB 2R5 (cid:126)r •(cid:16) 3G R + MBTr(I A) + MATr(I B) (2) MBC AI AC T A + MAC BI BC T B The second order mass distribution terms are the principally aligned in- ertia tensors, I A and I B, expressed as linear combinations of the inertia integrals: (cid:17) (cid:17) • (cid:126)r  T 0,2,0 i I i = Mi i + T 0,0,2 0 0 T 2,0,0 i 0 + T 0,0,2 0 i 0 T 2,0,0 i + T 0,2,0 i (3) The inertia integrals capture the mass distributions up to a truncation order N, here selected as the second order. In their generic form the inertia integrals are analogous to spherical harmonics while more similar in structure to the moments and products of inertia[7]. (cid:90) (cid:104) T l,m,n = 1 M Rl+m+n B xlymzndm, where l + m + n = N (4) A more general form of the mutual gravity potential may be found in the 2016 Hou et al. paper. 2.1. Equations of Motion Given the form of the mutual gravity potential the equations of motion (EOMs) for the F2BP can be generated. The inertial form of the F2BP has 12 degrees of freedom, however, using the relative dynamics it can be reduced to 9 degrees of freedom[6]. (cid:126)X = (cid:126)r (cid:126)θ1 (cid:126)θ2 (cid:126)r (cid:126)ω1 (cid:126)ω2 (5) where (cid:126)r is the relative separation vector measured from the primary to sec- ondary, the vectors (cid:126)θ1 and (cid:126)θ2 are Euler 123 angle sets defining the inertial orientation of the primary and the orientation of the secondary relative to the primary, the vectors (cid:126)ω1 and (cid:126)ω2 are the angular velocities corresponding to the Euler angles such that 6 (cid:105)T  (cid:126)θi = B i(cid:126)ωi cos θi,3 − sin θi,3 cos θi,2 sin θi,3 − sin θi,2 cos θi,3 cos θi,2 cos θi,3 sin θi,2 sin θi,3  0 0 cos θi,2 B i = 1 cos θi,2 The rotation matrix corresponding to the Euler angle sets are C i = C ((cid:126)θi) (6) (7) (8) where the Euler angle set is the standard Euler 123 body set. Although non-singular attitude representations are used to numerically integrate the binary system, we use Euler angles to describe the attitude because they have well-behaved and intuitive linearization properties for analysis later in this paper. The rotation matrices corresponding to the two Euler angle sets, (cid:126)θ1 and (cid:126)θ2, are then C A = C ((cid:126)θ1) C B/A = C ((cid:126)θ2) = C T AC B (9) (10) Where (cid:126)θ2 is selected as the mapping from the secondary's frame into the primary's frame for convenience of later analysis. Following the implementation of Maciejewski, the F2BP EOMs can be derived from Newton's second law and Euler's EOMs as [6]. (cid:16) (cid:126)ω2 = C B/AI −1 (cid:16) C B/AI BC T B C T + (cid:17) (cid:16) (cid:16) (cid:16) 7 (cid:126)r = −I −1 A I A(cid:126)ω1 ω1 + (cid:126)MA r − 2ω1 (cid:126)r − ω1 ω1(cid:126)r − 1 m ∂U ∂(cid:126)r (cid:126)ω1 = I −1 A I A(cid:126)ω1 ω1 + (cid:126)MA (cid:17) (cid:16) (cid:17) ·(cid:16) (cid:17) (cid:17) (cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 B/A C B/AI BC T B/A (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 ω1 + (cid:126)MB C B/A B/A + C B/AI B −I −1 I A(cid:126)ω1 ω1 + (cid:126)MA A (11) (12) (13) Where the (−) operator describes the skew-symmetric matrix transform on a vector in R3  0 −f3 f3 −f2 f2 0 −f1 0 f1 f =  (14) To fully implement the F2BP EOMs the mutual gravitational torques, (cid:126)MA and (cid:126)MB, must be accounted for, this is accomplished by taking the partials of the mutual gravity with respect to the relative states of the system. (cid:126)MB = −(cid:126)α × ∂U ∂(cid:126)α − (cid:126)β × ∂U ∂ (cid:126)β − (cid:126)γ × ∂U ∂(cid:126)γ (cid:126)MA = (cid:126)r × ∂U ∂ (cid:126)R − (cid:126)MB Where (cid:126)α, (cid:126)β, and (cid:126)γ are columns of the rotation matrix (cid:104) (cid:105) C B/A = (cid:126)α (cid:126)β (cid:126)γ (15) (16) (17) The derivation of this formulation of the gravity torques is further de- scribed in Maciejewski[6]. We choose not to include the effects of external perturbers, such as the Sun and planets, because their influence on the relative dynamics is small and would be mostly averaged out of the dynamics as the asteroids repeat their orbit. 2.2. Doubly Synchronous Equilibrium The high dimensionality of the nonplanar form of the F2BP makes dy- namical analysis of the general system complex and unwieldy; we thus turn to the doubly synchronous equilibrium for use as a simplified dynamical sand- box. For the F2BP the doubly synchronous equilibrium occurs when the bodies are aligned with their long axes facing each other, tidally locked and co-orbiting. Two such equilibria exist in the F2BP, an inner and outer so- lution, however only the outer solution is stable and seen in nature[8]. For the remainder of this paper only the outer stable equilibrium will be referred 8 IH = H •(cid:16) (cid:104) (cid:105)(cid:17) • H R2I 3x3 − (cid:126)r(cid:126)r to as the doubly synchronous equilibrium. In order to compute the doubly synchronous equilibrium for a given system the amended potential and its partials with respect to the degrees of freedom must be analyzed[16]. The amended potential is defined as E = H 2 2IH + U (18) Where H is the angular momentum magnitude and I H is the moment of inertia about the angular momentum axis, (19) the matrix ¯¯U denotes the identity matrix and • denotes the dot product. The scalar m is the reduced mass I A + I B + m Where H defines the unit direction of the angular momentum . m = MAMB MA + MB  cos δ sin δ sin λ sin δ cos λ  H = (20) (21) Where δ is an offset angle from the x-axis and λ acts as a clocking angle about the x-axis. In the equilibrium state angle δ is π/2 radians and angle λ is 0. Based on knowledge of the doubly synchronous equilibrium orientation for a second degree and order gravity field, we can simplify IH to IH = IA,z + IB,z + mr2 (22) The subscript z denotes the z-axis moment of inertia, or the polar moment of inertia for the body. For a given angular momentum of the system and set of mass parame- ters for the system, the zeroes of the partials of the amended potential with respect to the system degrees of freedom can be used to identify an equilib- rium. E(cid:126)r,E (cid:126)r,E(cid:126)θ,E (cid:126)θ ,Eδ,Eλ = 0 (23) 9 The detailed formulation of the amended potential partials used to find the extrema are (cid:104) ∂E ∂(cid:126)r = −H 2 I 2 H I3x3 − H H m (cid:105) • (cid:126)r + ∂U ∂(cid:126)r ∂E ∂(cid:126)θ 2 H •(cid:16) (cid:104) ∂E ∂ξ = − H 2 2I 2 H = − H 2 2I 2 H ∂IH ∂(cid:126)θ ∂U ∂(cid:126)θ + (cid:104) I A + I B + m R2I 3x3 − (cid:126)r(cid:126)r (24) (25) (26) (cid:105) (cid:105)(cid:17) • ∂ H ∂ξ Where ξ is either λ or δ To be stable, the Hessian of the amended potential evaluated at the equi- librium point must be positive definite. E (cid:126)X (cid:126)Xeq > 0 (27) Through this approach it can be shown that only the outer equilibrium point is energetically stable[8]. We thus conclude that the outer equilibrium is the only equilibria of interest when observing natural systems and focus on this configuration as the doubly synchronous equilibrium of interest. 3. Planar Dynamics Analysis To understand the system behavior at a fundamental level, we first sim- plify it further by applying a planar and second-order assumption. These assumptions reduce the system to four degrees of freedom, as illustrated in Fig. 2, such that it can be described as an inertial orbit angle θ, a relative separation magnitude R, and the phase angle of each body relative to the separation line φ1 and φ2. The equations of motion for this simplified system can be derived from a Lagrangian analysis of the dynamics[8]. The Lagrangian for the planar problem is L = 1 2 IA,zz φ2 1 + 1 2 IB,zz φ2 2 + 1 2 +(IA,zz φ1 + IB,zz 1 2 (IA,zz + IB,zz + mR2) θ2 m R2 + φ2) θ − Upl(R, φ1, φ2) (28) 10 Figure 2: Diagram of the planar and second-order F2BP. The system states are an inertial orbit angle θ, a relative separation magnitude R, and the phase angle of each body relative to the separation line φ1 and φ2. Where we define the term Ii,jj to be the mass normalized moment of inertia of body i about axis j. Application of Lagrange's equation yields the following EOMs R = θ2R − 1 m 1 1 θ = mR2 mR2 IA,zz mR2 IB,zz 1 + 1 + φ1 = −(cid:16) φ2 = −(cid:16) (cid:26) + mR2 ∂Upl ∂φ1 (cid:17) 1 (cid:17) 1 (cid:20) (cid:16)¯I A mR2 Tr − 2 ∂Upl ∂R ∂Upl ∂φ2 − 1 mR2 − 1 mR2 R θ R ∂Upl ∂φ2 ∂Upl ∂φ1 mR2 ∂Upl ∂φ1 ∂Upl ∂φ2 (cid:17) (cid:16) (cid:16)¯I B (cid:17) − 3 (cid:16) (cid:17) − cos 2φ2 + Tr + 2 + 2 R θ R R θ R Where Upl is the planar simplification of Eq. 2 Upl = −GMAMB 1 + R 2R2 1 (cid:16) +IB,xx + IB,yy − cos 2φ1 IA,yy − IA,xx (cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:21)(cid:27) IA,xx + IA,yy 2 IB,yy − IB,xx (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) Where we define ¯I i to be the mass normalized inertia tensor of body i For this realization of the system, the conditions for the doubly syn- chronous equilibrium can be can restated using the system states to specify axial alignment and a circular mutual orbit[17]. 11 𝑨𝑩𝑹𝝓𝟏𝝓𝟐𝜽φ1 = φ2 = φ1 = φ2 = R = 0 (34) From inspection it is clear that Uφi under these conditions is equal to zero, such that (35) Thus the necessary equilibrium rotation rate, θ∗, for an equilibrium sep- φ1 = φ2 = θ = 0 aration, R∗ is (cid:104) 1 + θ∗2 = G(MA + MB) R∗3 (cid:104) θ∗2 = 3 2R∗2 ∂Upl ∂R 1 mR∗ (cid:16) (cid:17) Tr I A + Tr (cid:16) (cid:17) − 3IA,xx − 3IB,xx (36) (cid:105)(cid:105) I B (37) The separation still must be selected to ensure the stability of the equi- librium as defined by the second partial of the amended potential in Eq. 27. With the planar and second-order assumption the relative separation can be reduced to a scalar value which allows us to identify the condition for stability[8]. (cid:114) R∗ > 3(MAIA,zz + MBIB,zz) m (38) 3.1. Linear System Manifolds Because the doubly synchronous equilibrium is an energetically stable ar- rangement, oscillations about the equilibrium will move along closed cycles, referred to as center manifolds. In their linear form each center manifold has an associated and unique frequency, this results from the purely imag- inary eigenvalue associated with the given center manifold[18]. Because of the dynamical coupling of the F2BP and its relation to the mass parame- ters, analysis of oscillations about the doubly synchronous equilibrium may provide insight into the observability of the mass parameters. To begin this analysis, we first must identify the eigenvalues of the dynamical system. This 12 is accomplished by computing the characteristic equation of the linearized system. The linearized dynamics are described by (cid:126)X = A (cid:126)X = (39)  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ∂ R ∂ R ∂R 0 ∂φ1 ∂ θ ∂ θ ∂R 0 ∂φ1 ∂ φ1 ∂R 0 ∂ φ1 ∂R 0 ∂ φ2 ∂ φ2 ∂φ1 ∂φ1 0 0 0 0 ∂ R ∂φ2 ∂ θ ∂φ2 ∂ φ1 ∂φ2 ∂ φ2 ∂φ2 1 0 0 0 0 ∂ θ ∂ R ∂ φ1 ∂ R ∂ φ2 ∂ R 0 1 0 0 ∂ R ∂ θ ∂ θ ∂ θ ∂ φ1 ∂ θ ∂ φ2 ∂ θ   0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  R θ φ1 φ2 R θ φ1 φ2 The eigenvalues of the system are roots of the characteristic equation A − λI 8x8 = 0 (40) which can be related to a period of motion of the linearized oscillations Pβi = 2π Im(λi) (41) Here βi specifies the imaginary component of the corresponding root or eigenvalue, λi. The described periodic behavior moves along a linear manifold defined by a deviation vector from the equilibrium δ (cid:126)Xλi = Re((cid:126)ui) Re((cid:126)ui)2 cos θi + Im((cid:126)ui) Im((cid:126)ui)2 sin θi (42) Where (cid:126)ui are the eigenvectors corresponding to a given eigenvalue. For the planar system we have already identified one fundamental frequency in the form of the equilibrium orbit rate constraint, θ∗. The eigen decompo- sition provides an additional three oscillations, or fundamental frequencies. Each is associated with one of the planar states; that is the relative separa- tion R, and the primary and secondary phase angles, φ1 and φ2. Because the orbit angle θ is an ignorable coordinate it has a zero eigenvalue and thus no associated frequency from the eigen decomposition. In Table 2 the linear periods for the 617 Patroclus system are listed. In the linear form, the center manifolds each form an elliptic oscillation of arbitrary amplitude about their associated state with a unique linear period 13 Table 2: Linear periods of manifolds about the planar doubly synchronous equilibrium evaluated for the 617 Patroclus system. Manifold Linear Period [days] r φ1 φ2 Orbit 3.93 13.60 12.12 4.41 (Table 2). Of interest in the linear system is the influence of the mass pa- rameters on the linear periods of each manifold. To explore this we evaluate the linear periods of the system as the density, volume and axes of each body are scaled, shown in Fig. 3-5. Figure 3: Behavior of planar doubly synchronous manifold linear periods as the density of the system is scaled. As the density is scaled upwards in Fig. 3 the periods each decrease in length implying a link between the system mass and the speed of its motion. The two phase angle periods also show very similar behavior with a roughly constant gap between their periods, a unique behavior associated with den- sity scaling. In the case of volumetric scaling, Fig. 4, the separation and secondary phase angle periods show a muted response, while the behavior of the primary phase angle period shows a high sensitivity. In this figure, and the axis scaling figure, Fig. 5, there is an apparent switching of the pri- mary and secondary phase angle periods near the unity scaling factor. This 14 Figure 4: Behavior of planar doubly synchronous manifold linear periods as the volume of each body is scaled. results from the secondary becoming more massive as one of the bodies is scaled resulting in the gravitational dominance switching from the primary to the secondary. It is also of note that the scaling of the minor and in- termediate axes is truncated near the scaling factor of one, this is done to avoid degeneration of the system by scaling the body to a oblate spheroidal shape. In the axial scaling analysis, Fig. 5, as each of the three axes is independently scaled, regardless of the body, a unique response occurs in the periods for each axis scaling; implying unique behavior associated with each moment of inertia. While this analysis does not provide a definite method of determining the observability of the mass parameters, it does point towards unique behaviors of the system as different aspects of the mass distribution are scaled. We thus conclude that oscillations about the equilibrium likely will impact observations of binary systems to a significant degree. 3.2. Planar Observability To understand the influence of the mass parameters on the fundamental frequencies, we continue with analysis of the planar and second-order F2BP. The periods of the fundamental frequencies are considered as idealized mea- surements made by observers. While direct observations of these frequencies would require extensive observations in close proximity, the frequencies more succinctly contain the same information content as direct observations of the dynamics and help to provide a best case analysis. We approximate the sensitivity of the fundamental frequencies to the mass parameters as 15 Figure 5: Behavior of planar doubly synchronous manifold linear periods as the length of each ellipsoid axis is scaled. δ(cid:126)Ω = • δ (cid:126)T ∂(cid:126)Ω ∂ (cid:126)T (43) Where the vector (cid:126)Ω is the set of fundamental frequencies derived from the eigen decomposition and the doubly synchronous orbit rate with βi representing the linearized manifold periods, Pβi. The vector (cid:126)T is the set of second order principal-axis inertia integrals (44) (45) (cid:3) (cid:126)Ω =(cid:2)(cid:126)Λ, θ(cid:3) , where (cid:126)Λ =(cid:2)βR, βφ1, βφ2 (cid:126)T =(cid:2)T 2,0,0 , T 0,0,2 , T 2,0,0 , T 0,2,0 A B A A , T 0,2,0 , T 0,0,2 B B (cid:3) 16 It is assumed that knowledge about the mass of each body is gained from its relative separation and the reflex motion of the system about its center of mass. We define ∂ (cid:126)Ω as the sensitivity matrix, with which a least norm ∂ (cid:126)T differential corrector can be used to estimate the mass parameters based on the observed frequencies. The three frequencies arising from the manifold analysis are not analytically derived because of the complexity of the dynamics matrix and instead were computed numerically. Because of this, the partials of these frequencies could not be derived in closed form. Instead we leverage properties of the characteristic equation A − λiI = 0 0 = anλn i + an−1λn−1 i + ... + a1λi + a0 (46) (47) Where the coefficients an represent coefficients found from the determinant computation. We then take the partial of the characteristic equation in its polynomial form with respect each element j of the mass parameter vector, (cid:126)T 0 = ∂an ∂ (cid:126)T (j) λn i + an ∂λi ∂ (cid:126)T (j) λn−1 i + ∂an−1 ∂ (cid:126)T (j) λn−1 i + an−1 ∂λi ∂ (cid:126)T (j) λn−2 i + ... (48) + ∂a1 ∂ (cid:126)T (j) λi + a1 ∂λi ∂ (cid:126)T (j) ∂λi ∂ (cid:126)T (j) by substituting the numerically We can then solve for the the partial generated values of λ. Using the imaginary component of this partial, we can compute the matrix ∂ (cid:126)β ∂ (cid:126)T for use in the sensitivity matrix. For the planar and second-order realization of the problem the sensitivity matrix is rank deficient at rank 4 while having 6 columns from vector (cid:126)T . As a result the differential corrector will find a solution lying in a two dimensional solution plane, defined by two nullspace vectors of the sensitivity matrix. Because the mass parameters of interest are the second order principal-axis inertia integrals, we can utilize the definition of the inertia ellipsoid Izz ≤ Ixx + Iyy Izz ≥ Iyy ≥ lxx (49) (50) and thus constrain the valid area on the solution plane. 17 If such an estimation scheme were to be used, then other system observa- tions and measurements would need to be gathered to find an exact solution. For instance flybys of either asteroid measuring the spherical harmonics or other mass tracking techniques. In the case of spherical harmonics measure- ments, constraints can be derived from the relationship[19] Ix − Iy = −4M r2 Iy − Iz = r2 sC22 s(C20 − 2C22) (51) (52) Where rs is an arbitrary scaling length. The projection of these constraint lines onto the solution plane provides the information necessary to reduce the estimated solution from a two dimensional space to a single point. We illustrate the planar estimation approach in Fig. 6 by computing a set of initial mass parameter guesses with a Gaussian perturbation up to 5% from the "truth" mass parameter values. These are then projected onto the solution plane, shown as the red points, where the axes are the two nullspace vectors. We then project the inertia ellipsoid constraints onto the solution plane as the sets of magenta and green lines, for the primary and secondary respectively. Finally, the spherical harmonics constraints are projected onto the solution plane as the blue and black lines for the primary and red and cyan lines for the secondary.Because of the similarity in shape between Patroclus and the secondary Menoetius, the constraint lines appear to be overlapping in the figure. For a more dissimilar binary pair the spherical harmonics constraint lines would be more distinct. With all of these bounds and constraints in the figure, the different steps of this estimation process are clear; resulting in the final green truth at the crossing of the spherical harmonics constraints. 4. Nonplanar Mass Parameter Observability 4.1. Expansion To Nonplanar Manifolds The restrictions of the planar system enable a simple, but limited, ap- proach to detailed analysis of the observability. However understanding the impact of out-of-plane motion on the number of manifolds and their behav- ior is vital for a full understanding of the mass parameter observability. We thus expand our dynamics model to the more general model with the mutual gravity potential truncated at order two, recalling Eq. 11-13. The increased 18 Figure 6: Projection of planar mass parameter estimates onto the solution nullspace plane. The inertia constraints illustrate the bounds caused by the inertia ellipsoid projected onto the plane. The C20 and C22 constraints illustrate the knowledge added by measurement of either bodies second order spherical harmonics terms; because of the similar shape of the two bodies simulated the spherical harmonics constraints overlap. The axes represent unitless perturbations along each nullspace vector. dimensionality of the nonplanar system results in seven system center mani- folds from the eighteen states, as opposed to the three system manifolds from eight states in the planar problem. There are also two ignorable coordinates associated with zero-valued eigenvalues as opposed to the single ignorable coordinate of the planar case. Because of the complexity of developing the mutual gravity potential and torques as well as the equations of motion we choose not to reduce the state representation to a minimal set. Because the doubly synchronous behavior does not change from the planar to nonplanar dynamics the θ constraint remains unchanged. The behaviors of each of these eight fundamental frequencies are illustrated in Fig. 7. 19 Figure 7: Diagram of the nonplanar doubly synchronous equilibrium. The perturbations associated with each system center manifold are illustrated to visualize their behavior. We see that the three manifolds from the planar case remain for the non- planar case, now being referred to as β3, β4, and β5. Two of the new manifolds are associated with precession and nutation of the primary and secondary, respectively β2 and β7. The remaining two new manifolds are associated with a relative axial twist about the radial axis, β1, and the precession and nutation of the orbit plane, β6. The periods of the linear manifolds for these fundamental frequencies are shown for the 617 Patroclus system in Table 3. As with the planar case, for observations of the nonplanar system, we make the assumption that the reflex motion has been well characterized, providing constraints on the relative separation and the mass ratio, defined here as µ = MB MA + MB (53) Thus the mass of each body can be evaluated based on an estimate of the total mass As a result our estimated mass parameters can be the total mass and the MT = MA + MB (54) 20 1𝝎1𝝎2ሶ𝜃Table 3: Linear periods of manifolds about the nonplanar doubly synchronous equilibrium evaluated for the 617 Patroclus system. Manifold Linear Period [days] β1 β2 β3 β4 β5 β6 β7 Orbit 18.97 15.67 13.65 12.13 4.41 3.86 2.91 4.41 second order inertia integrals for both bodies. (cid:126)T =(cid:2)MT , T 2,0,0 A , T 0,2,0 A , T 0,0,2 A , T 2,0,0 B , T 0,2,0 B , T 0,0,2 B (cid:3) (55) Given the increase in the number of system manifolds the system frequency vector, (cid:126)Ω, for the nonplanar estimation becomes (cid:126)Ω =(cid:2)β1, β2, β3, β4, β5, β6, β7, θ(cid:3) (56) For this estimation we now have more observables than estimated values, thus the problem is overconstrained and can provide a full solution for the mass parameters from a theoretical standpoint. The process of estimation will again apply Eq. 43, however the larger and more complex dynamics matrix for the nonplanar problem requires a new approach to computing the partials of the fundamental frequencies with respect to the mass parameters. Properties of the left and right eigenvectors are leveraged to compute the frequency partials. The left eigenvectors are defined as λi(cid:126)vi = AT ( (cid:126)T )(cid:126)vi while the right eigenvectors are defined as λi(cid:126)ui = A( (cid:126)T )(cid:126)ui (57) (58) where the i indicates the specific eigenvalue-vector pair. To begin the deriva- tion, the partial of the right eigenvalue equation is taken with respect to the 21 jth mass parameter ∂λi ∂ (cid:126)T (j) (cid:126)ui + λi ∂(cid:126)ui ∂ (cid:126)T (j) = ∂A ∂ (cid:126)T (j) (cid:126)ui + A ∂(cid:126)ui ∂ (cid:126)T (j) (59) Left multiplying this partial by the transpose of the left eigenvectors, (cid:126)vT equation becomes i , the ∂λi ∂ (cid:126)T (j) i (cid:126)ui + λi(cid:126)vT (cid:126)vT i ∂(cid:126)ui ∂ (cid:126)T (j) = (cid:126)vT i ∂A ∂ (cid:126)T (j) (cid:126)ui + (cid:126)vT i A ∂(cid:126)ui ∂ (cid:126)T (j) (60) in which the ∂(cid:126)ui ∂ (cid:126)T (j) Rearranging to solve for the partial of the frequency, βi only terms cancel based on the definition of the left eigenvector. (cid:16) 1 (cid:17) ∂βi ∂ (cid:126)T (j) = Im (cid:126)vT i ∂A ∂ (cid:126)T (j) (cid:126)ui (cid:126)vT i (cid:126)ui ∂(cid:126)Ω ∂ (cid:126)P = diag(cid:0)(cid:126)Ω(cid:1)2 2π 22 Thus the sensitivity matrix for the nonplanar problem can be computed element by element, iterating over this equation. Given the complete solution generated by the estimation process, we can now analyze the uncertainties of the estimated mass parameters. The covari- ance and correlation of the mass parameters generated from this approach help to quantify the influence of the mass parameters on dynamical observa- tions. To begin this analysis the covariance matrix for the mass parameters, PT T , is formulated by relating the pseudo-inverse of the sensitivity matrix and the observational covariance of the fundamental frequencies, P ΩΩ (cid:17)−1 ∂(cid:126)Ω (cid:16) ∂(cid:126)Ω ∂ (cid:126)T T ∂(cid:126)Ω ∂ (cid:126)T T • P ΩΩ • ∂(cid:126)Ω ∂ (cid:126)T ∂ (cid:126)T (cid:17)−1 (cid:16) ∂(cid:126)Ω ∂ (cid:126)T T ∂(cid:126)Ω ∂ (cid:126)T P T T = δ (cid:126)T δ (cid:126)T T = (62) Because the frequencies are not an intuitive measurement the covariance of the fundamental frequencies is converted to the covariance of fundamental periods P ΩΩ = T ∂(cid:126)Ω ∂ (cid:126)P • P P P • ∂(cid:126)Ω ∂ (cid:126)P (63) This conversion is simply the derivative of the frequency and period relation- ship. (61) (64) Table 4: Allowable observational variance of observations for 10% certainty of mass pa- rameter estimates of the 617 Patroclus system. Mass Parameter Observational Accuracy Requirement [sec] A MT T 200 T 020 T 002 T 200 T 020 T 002 B B A A B 10584.0 25.3 25.3 25.3 15.0 15.0 15.0 To define the covariance of the fundamental periods it is assumed that all periods would be independently measured using the same observation tech- nique. P P P = σ2 P • I (65) where there is a single period observational variance, σP , that is applied to the observations of each period. This observational variance can be considered to be a temporal resolution of the period measurements or the precision of each measurement. 4.2. An Idealized Estimation Method This formulation of the covariance allows us to treat the sensitivity anal- ysis approach as an idealized estimation approach. Here the observational variance, σP , would act as an observational accuracy requirement to constrain the mass parameter estimates to a specific accuracy level. In Table 4 this is leveraged to predict the observational variance necessary in order to gain 10% knowledge of each of the seven mass parameters of the 617 Patroclus system. To provide further insight, we compute the mass parameter variance for 617 Patroclus, given a 1 second observation variance ¯σT =(cid:2)9.45 × 10−6 3.95 × 10−3 3.94 × 10−3 3.95 × 10−3 6.64 × 10−3 6.64 × 10−3 6.64 × 10−3(cid:3)T (66) 23 and the correlation matrix  (67) 1.  ρT T = 1. 0.99 0.99 0.99 1. 0.99 −0.27 −0.27 −0.27 −0.64 −0.64 −0.64 0.99 −0.55 −0.55 −0.55 0.99 −0.55 −0.55 −0.55 −0.55 −0.55 −0.55 1. 0.99 0.99 1. −0.27 −0.27 −0.27 −0.64 −0.55 −0.55 −0.55 −0.64 −0.55 −0.55 −0.55 −0.64 −0.55 −0.55 −0.55 1. 0.99 0.99 0.99 1. 0.99 The values for the variance and correlation in Eq. 66 and 67 are generated from the covariance matrix, which is not included for the sake of brevity and clarity. The bar used with variance values are normalized by the mass parameters corresponding to each element, such that they represent fractional covariances and variances ¯P T T (i, j) = ¯σT (i) = ρT T (i, j) = PT T (i, j) (cid:126)T (i) (cid:126)T (j) σT (i) (cid:126)T (i) ¯P T T (i, j) ¯σT (i)¯σT (j) (68) (69) (70) 4.3. Mass Parameter Scaling Effects on Observability While these results show the mass parameters to be well estimated based on their variances, the observational requirement of 1 second variance on each frequency is highly restrictive. Likewise, the observational requirements to achieve 10% knowledge of the inertia integrals in table 4 further illustrates the accuracy of observations necessary for second order parameter measure- ments. In combination with the high correlation on the second order param- eters, it becomes clear that without further constraints, via in-situ gravity measurement or other methods, such an estimation approach is not feasible even with these idealized observations. To better understand the observability of binary systems as a whole we now investigate the effects of scaling the mass parameters on the correlation and covariance matrices. Specifically we scale the mass ratio and second order principal inertia integrals of Menoetius, the 617 Patroclus secondary. This is done as a means to explore the effects of mass ratio and differing asteroid mass 24 distributions on the mass parameter observability. We do not simultaneously scale the second order asteroid inertia integrals as this would merely scale the correlation and covariance as opposed to changing their structure. Likewise only the secondary is scaled as the system is nearly symmetric such that scaling either body will show the same observability behavior. The scaling of the inertia integrals is limited such that the asteroid remains a triaxial ellipsoid as opposed to an oblate spheroid; this is to avoid the degeneration of the manifolds of the system caused by symmetric semi-axes. For simplicity the second order principal axis inertia integrals of the sec- ondary are refered to here as Tx, Ty, and Tz. The study performed scales the mass ratio by .1 and .55, Tx by .88 and .94, Ty by .7 and .85, and Tz by .01 and .51. The scaling floor for Tx and Ty is selected to avoid the the inertia integral dropping below the next smallest inertia integral which would cause an spherical degeneracy, thus Tz has no floor. Fig. 8 and 9 illustrate the covariance and correlation with the covariance elements colored by their log value and the correlation elements colored by their linear value from -1 to 1. The key point of interest in this case is whether the scaling of these mass parameters can lower the correlation between the each body's second order inertia integrals. What both results show is that outside of the case of an extremely flattened body, the second order inertia integrals remain highly correlated. Even in the case of an extremely flattened body only the Tz correlation changes significantly while the Tx and Ty relationship remains very coupled. This implies that the dynamical effects of these unknown mass parameters can be significant for most shapes and configurations. 5. Near-Spherical Doubly Synchronous Systems For a number of observed doubly synchronous binaries current shape knowledge is limited to a mean radius value or spherical shape estimate. However, for a binary system to remain in a stable doubly synchronous or- bit, dynamical analysis has shown that the mass distribution of the bodies must be elongated such that the bodies mutual gravity torques exist to en- force the tidal locking. One result of this is that for a sphere-sphere doubly synchronous system four of the manifolds become zero eigenvalues due to the lack of attitude interaction between the bodies, described in Table 5 for the Pluto-Charon system. In addition, for a nearly spherical body the effects of any elongation will be so low that the periods of these four manifolds will be functionally immeasurable. 25 Figure 8: Effects of secondary mass parameter scaling on mass parameter covariance matrix with magnitude of matrix elements shown in log color. To better analyze these near spherical systems we perform a linearization about the spherical shape of the bodies using an elongation factor which perturbs the bodies as triaxial ellipsoids defined such that a = R(1 + ), abc = R3 b = R, Ix = 2M R2 5 (1 − ), Iy = 2M R2 5 26 c = R(1 − ) 2M R2 5 , Ix = (71) (72) (73) (1 + ) 246=.1246-10-9-8-7-6-5Mass Ratio Scaling Covariance246=.55246-9-8-7-6-5-4246=s246-10-9-8-7-6-5246Tx=.88Tx246-9-8-7-6-5Secondary Tx Scaling Covariance246Tx=.94Tx246-10-8-6-4246Tx=Tx246-10-9-8-7-6-5246Ty=.7Ty246-10-9-8-7-6-5Secondary Ty Scaling Covariance246Ty=.85Ty246-10-9-8-7-6-5246Ty=Ty246-10-9-8-7-6-5246Tz=.01Tz246-10-9-8-7-6-5Secondary Tz Scaling Covariance246Tz=.51Tz246-10-9-8-7-6-5246Tz=Tz246-10-9-8-7-6-5Figure 9: Effects of secondary mass parameter scaling on mass parameter correlation matrix with magnitude of matrix elements shown in linear color. where a, b, and c are the semi-axes. Using these definitions of the near-spherical mass distributions we can linearize the dynamics as δ(cid:126)Ω = (cid:104) ∂(cid:126)Ω (cid:105) δ(cid:126) (74) ∂(cid:126) sphere 27 246=.1246-0.500.51Mass Ratio Scaling Correlation2468=.552468-0.500.51246=246-0.500.51246Tx=.88Tx246-0.500.51Secondary Tx Scaling Correlation246Tx=.94Tx246-0.500.51246Tx=Tx246-0.500.51246Ty=.7Ty246-0.500.51Secondary Ty Scaling Correlation246Ty=.85Ty246-0.500.51246Ty=Ty246-0.500.51246Tz=.01Tz246-0.500.51Secondary Tz Scaling Correlation246Tz=.51Tz246-0.500.51246Tz=Tz246-0.500.51(cid:104) ∂(cid:126)Ω ∂ (cid:126)T (cid:105) ∂ (cid:126)T ∂(cid:126) δ(cid:126)Ω = δ(cid:126) sphere ∂ (cid:126)T ∂(cid:126) =  −2R2 P 5 0 0 −2R2 C 5 0 0 0 0 2R2 P 5 0 0 2R2 C 5  (75) (76) where (cid:126)Ω represents the remaining system frequenciess, (cid:126)T again represents the vector of only the second-order principal-axis inertia integrals, and (cid:126) rep- resents the elongation factors applied to the primary and secondary body independently. It is of note that this linearization assumes that the equilib- rium separation remains constant as the bodies are elongated. This means that the equilibrium orbit rate must scale as the bodies are elongated while maintaining the observed separation. This effect on the orbit rate is analo- gous to the effect on the other three periods of the elongation, however they are not as simply expressed as the orbit rate, whose change can be directly computed. By analyzing the linearized effects of the deformation on the four remaining periods and observing the behavior of these measurable manifold periods, we provide a different approach to understand the effects of the mass distributions of near-spherical systems. 5.1. Application to Pluto-Charon System To illustrate the use of this approach we apply it to the Pluto-Charon system, a doubly synchronous binary for which only mean radius information has been reliably measured. The density and shape results of Nimmo et al.'s analysis of New Horizons images report the density of Pluto and Charon m3 and the mean radii to be 1188.3±1.6 km and to be 1854 kg 606.0±1.0 km respectively[20]. Applying our analysis to these parameters the system periods can be computed for the spherical system, Table 5. m3 and 1701 kg Beginning from the spherical system periods we apply the linearization in three ways to understand what information can be gained from this anal- ysis. The first approach is to perturb only the shape of Pluto, next only the shape of Charon is perturbed, and finally the shape of both bodies are 28 Table 5: Linear periods of manifolds about the nonplanar doubly synchronous equilibrium evaluated for the spherical Pluto-Charon system. Manifold Linear Period [days] β1 β2 β3 β4 β5 β6 β7 Orbit DNE DNE DNE DNE 6.39 6.39 6.39 6.39 identically perturbed. This is to say that the vector (cid:126) can be expressed as [1, 0] · P luto, [0, 1] · Charon, and [1, 1] · system respectively. From these three approaches, illustrated in Fig. 10, we see that the relative behavior of the pe- riods differs uniquely for deformation of each body. This implies that through measurement of the relative lengths of the periods, information on the mass distribution could be gathered to help constrain each body's mass distribu- tion. As is clear from these results however, the deformation of the bodies would need to be sufficiently large to be detected by realistic measurement methods. For a comparison point we also compute the complete set of nonplanar periods associated with an ellipsoidal mass distribution for both Pluto and Charon generated with a value of =.0008. This value of is selected because it lies in the middle of the certainty bounds on the mean radius values re- ported by Nimmo et al; representing roughly a 1 km deformation in Pluto's semi-axes and a .5 km change in Charon's semi-axes. This is reported in Ta- ble 6 and further confirms the difficulty of applying our approach to a system so near to the spherical case. The four short periods would not be feasible to distinguish or measure with sufficient accuracy. The four long periods on the other hand would require logistically impossible measurement efforts to be accurately and precisely observed, due to their length. 6. Conclusions and Future Work In this paper we have shown that the influence of mass parameters on the observable dynamics of binary asteroids, up to the second order, in the dou- 29 Figure 10: Linearized change in Pluto-Charon manifold periods as shape is modified by parameter. From left to right the figures show and elongation of only Pluto, elongation of only Charon, and equal elongation of both Pluto and Charon bly synchronous equilibrium will affect dynamical observations significantly. The use of the doubly synchronous assumption allowed for a relatively sim- ple differential corrector method to elucidate fundamental frequencies of the system as a target binary oscillates near the equilibrium. In order to accom- plish this we analyzed the manifolds of the planar problem and investigated the influence of mass parameters on the linear behavior of these manifolds to understand how they may affect observations of these systems. For the planar case we found that the mass parameters were not fully observable based purely on observations of the dynamics and would require other in- situ or remote observations to constrain a system's mass parameters. For the nonplanar F2BP we were able to show that the mass parameters were fully observable using only observations of the system dynamics, although the observational requirements are demanding. For the nonplanar differen- 30 Table 6: Linear periods of manifolds about the nonplanar doubly synchronous equilibrium evaluated for the =.0008 Pluto-Charon system. Manifold Linear Period [days] β1 β2 β3 β4 β5 β6 β7 Orbit 4659.25 1442.06 393.35 96.37 6.39 6.39 6.33 6.39 tial corrector estimation we were able to investigate the achievable covariance of the estimated mass parameters based on the accuracy of observations of the system dynamics. This provides an understanding of the information quality requirements for the proposed mass parameter estimation approach to be effective. From this analysis we can conclude that more robust mea- surements, likely from an in-situ spacecraft, would be necessary for mass parameter estimation. Finally, a limited approach to the application of this analysis to near-spherical systems was presented and applied to the Pluto- Charon system. Appendix A. The Hou Mutual Gravity Potential The general order Hou et al. reformulation of the mutual gravity potential begins from the double integral description of the mutual gravity potential. N(cid:88) U = −G 1 Rn+1 n=0 Un (A.1) A binomial expansion and Legendre polynomial expansion are then per- formed to approximate the mass distribution to order N with the inertia 31 integrals in a recursive summation. (cid:88) 0(cid:88) Un = tn k ×bn−k ak (i1,i2,i3)(i4,i5,i6) (A.2) k(2)=n (i1,i2,i3)(i41,i5,i6)(j1,j2,j3)(j4,j5,j6) (j1,j2,j3)(j4,j5,j6)ei1+i4 ×MBT x ei2+i5 y (cid:48)(i4+j4),(i5+j5),(i6+j6) B A z MAT (i1+j1),(i2+j2),(i3+j3) ei3+i6 Where k(2) implies stepping by 2 as opposed to 1 Here the recursive coefficient is represented by tn k . k+2 = −(n − k)(n + k + 1) (k + 2)(k + 1) tn (A.3) While the binomial expansion coefficients are ak (i1,i2,i3)(i4,i5,i6) and bn−k (j1,j2,j3)(j4,j5,j6). (A.4) (A.5) (i1,i2,i3)(i4,i5,i6) = ak−1 ak (i1,i2,i3−1)(i4,i5,i6) − ak−1 +ak−1 −ak−1 (i1−1,i2,i3)(i4,i5,i6) + ak−1 (i1,i2,i3)(i4−1,i5,i6) − ak−1 (i1,i2,i3)(i4,i5,i6−1) (i1,i2−1,i3)(i4,i5,i6) (i1,i2,i3)(i4,i5−1,i6) (j1,j2,j3)(j4,j5,j6) = bk−2 bk (j1−2,j2,j3)(j4,j5,j6) + bk−2 +bk−2 (j1,j2,j3−2)(j4,j5,j6) + bk−2 −2bk−2 (j1−1,j2,j3)(j4−1,j5,j6) − 2bk−2 (j1,j2,j3)(j4−2,j5,j6) + bk−2 (j1,j2−1,j3)(j4,j5−1,j6) − 2bk−2 (j1,j2−2,j3)(j4,j5,j6) (j1,j2,j3)(j4,j5−2,j6) + bk−2 (j1,j2,j3)(j4,j5,j6−2) (j1,j2,j3−1)(j4,j5,j6−1) For these coefficients the superscripts and subscripts serve as indices. The i and j expansion indices are constrained by and summation over these indices sums over the possible combinations of these indices based on the values of k and n and the constraint equations. k = i1 + i2 + i3 + i4 + i5 + i6 n − k = j1 + j2 + j3 + j4 + j5 + j6 (A.6) (A.7) The variables R and ex, ey, and ez represent the magnitude and unit direction of the relative separation. The variables TA and T (cid:48) B are the mass-normalized inertia integral sets for the primary and secondary bodies, where the prime denotes that the inertia integrals of the secondary are rotated into the frame of the primary. 32 Appendix A.1. Inertia Integrals Central to this reformulation of the mutual potential is the use of inertia integrals to describe the mass distribution. This aspect of the reformulation is accomplished by the application of a Legendre polynomial expansion to describe the mass distributions, where the Legendre coefficients are referred to as inertia integrals. T l,m,n = 1 M Rl+m+n B xlymzndm, where l + m + n = N (A.8) In this way the inertia integrals can be considered analogous in use to spher- ical harmonics[7]. The mathematical form of the inertia integrals is similar to that of the moments and products of inertia for a rigid body wherein each term represents the mass distribution about some axis, however the inertia integrals are expanded to order N whereas moments of inertia are linear combinations of second order inertia integrals. Here we provide the mass and length normalized form of an inertia integral along with the 0th and 2nd order coefficients in terms of the normalized moments and product of inertia. (cid:90) (cid:90) T l,m,n = 1 M Rl+m+n B xlymzndm, where l + m + n = N 1 = T 0,0,0 Ixx = T 0,2,0 + T 0,0,2 Iyy = T 2,0,0 + T 0,0,2 Izz = T 2,0,0 + T 0,2,0 Ixy = −T 1,1,0 Ixz = −T 1,0,1 Iyz = −T 0,1,1 (A.9) (A.10) (A.11) (A.12) (A.13) (A.14) (A.15) (A.16) It is of note that the 0th order inertia integral is equal to the mass for the non-normalized form, thus it is equal to one in the normalized form. Appendix B. Planar Dynamics Matrix (cid:126)X =(cid:2)r θ φ1 φ2 (cid:3)T r θ φ1 φ2 (B.1) 33  0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 ∂ r ∂r ∂ θ ∂r ∂ φ1 ∂r ∂ φ2 ∂r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ∂ r 0 ∂φ1 ∂ θ 0 ∂φ1 0 ∂ φ1 ∂φ1 0 ∂ φ2 ∂φ1 0 0 0 0 ∂ r ∂φ2 ∂ θ ∂φ2 ∂ φ1 ∂φ2 ∂ φ2 ∂φ2 1 0 0 0 0 ∂ θ ∂ r ∂ φ1 ∂ r ∂ φ2 ∂ r 0 1 0 0 ∂ r ∂ θ ∂ θ ∂ θ ∂ φ1 ∂ θ ∂ φ2 ∂ θ (cid:126)X = A (cid:126)X = ∂r ∂r = θ2 − Vrr m ∂r ∂φ1 = −Vrφ1 m ∂r ∂φ2 = −Vrφ2 m ∂r ∂ θ = 2 θr ∂ θ ∂r = −2 Vφ1 mr3 + Vφ1 mr2 − 2 Vφ2 mr3 + Vφ2 mr2 + 2 r θ r2 ∂ θ ∂φ1 ∂ θ ∂φ2 = Vφ1φ1 mr2 = Vφ2φ2 mr2 ∂ θ ∂ r ∂ θ ∂ θ = −2 = −2 θ r r r 34   r θ φ1 φ2 r θ φ1 φ2 (B.2) (B.3) (B.4) (B.5) (B.6) (B.7) (B.8) (B.9) (B.10) (B.11) (cid:0)Vφ1 + Vφ2 (cid:1) mr3 − (cid:0)Vrφ1 + Vrφ2 (cid:1) mr2 ∂ φ1 ∂r = 2 − Vrφ1 MAIA,zz − 2 r θ r2 ∂ φ1 ∂φ1 = −Vφ1φ1 mr2 − Vφ1φ1 MAIA,zz ∂ φ1 ∂φ2 = −Vφ2φ2 mr2 ∂ φ1 ∂ r = 2 θ r (cid:0)Vφ1 + Vφ2 (cid:1) mr3 − ∂ φ2 ∂r = 2 ∂ φ1 ∂ θ = 2 r r (cid:0)Vrφ1 + Vrφ2 mr2 (cid:1) − Vrφ2 MBIB,zz − 2 r θ r2 ∂ φ2 ∂φ1 = −Vφ1φ1 mr2 ∂ φ2 ∂φ2 = −Vφ2φ2 mr2 − Vφ2φ2 MBIB,zz ∂ φ2 ∂ r ∂ φ2 ∂ θ = 2 = 2 θ r r r 35 (B.12) (B.13) (B.14) (B.15) (B.16) (B.17) (B.18) (B.19) (B.20) (B.21) GMAMB Vr = r2 −3 2 Vrr = 2 GMAMB GMAMB − 6 r3 r5 −3 2 For second order inertia tensor formulation of mutual potential, partials of the potential are as follows: (B.23) (B.24) (B.25) (B.22) 3 2r2 Vφ2 = 3 Vφ1 = 3 (cid:1) (cid:1) GMAMB 2r3 GMAMB 2r3 (cid:0)IA,xx + IA,yy + IA,zz + IB,xx + IB,yy + IB,zz (cid:0)1 + (cid:1)(cid:0)IA,yy − IA,xx (cid:1) + IB,xx + IB,yy (cid:0)IA,xx + IA,yy − cos(cid:0)2φ1 (cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) (cid:1)(cid:0)IB,yy − IB,xx −cos(cid:0)2φ2 (cid:1)(cid:0)IA,yy − IA,xx sin(cid:0)2φ1 sin(cid:0)2φ2 (cid:1)(cid:0)IB,yy − IB,xx (cid:0)IA,xx + IA,yy + IA,zz + IB,xx + IB,yy + IB,zz (cid:1)(cid:0)IA,yy − IA,xx (cid:1) + IB,xx + IB,yy (cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) (cid:1)(cid:0)IB,yy − IB,xx sin(cid:0)2φ1 (cid:1)(cid:0)IA,yy − IA,xx (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1)(cid:0)IB,yy − IB,xx sin(cid:0)2φ2 (cid:1) (cid:1)(cid:0)IA,yy − IA,xx cos(cid:0)2φ1 (cid:1) (cid:1)(cid:0)IB,yy − IB,xx cos(cid:0)2φ2 (cid:0)IA,xx + IA,yy − cos(cid:0)2φ1 −cos(cid:0)2φ2 Vrφ1 = −9 Vrφ2 = −9 Vφ1φ1 = 3 GMAMB 2r4 GMAMB 2r4 GMAMB GMAMB Vφ2φ2 = 3 r3 r3 (B.26) (B.27) (B.28) (B.29) 36 Appendix C. Nonplanar Dynamics Matrix Within this section we add the notation to denote a skew-symmetric matrix operator in addition to the previous tilde notation. (cid:16)−(cid:17)s  03 03 03 (cid:126)R ∂ ∂(cid:126)r ∂ (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)r ∂ (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)r 03 (cid:126)θ1 ∂ ∂(cid:126)θ1 03 03 03 03 03 03 (cid:126)θ2 ∂ ∂(cid:126)θ2 ∂ (cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)θ2 ∂ (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)θ2 ∂ (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)θ2 03 03 03 B1 03 03 03 ∂ (cid:126)r ∂ (cid:126)r 03 03 03 B2 ∂ (cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)ω1 ∂ (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)ω1 ∂ (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)ω1 03 03 ∂ (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)ω2 (cid:17)s ∂(cid:126)γ ∂(cid:126)θ2 (cid:126)β = −α ∂2U ∂(cid:126)α∂(cid:126)r + ∂(cid:126)α ∂(cid:126)θ2 (cid:16)∂U (cid:17)s ∂(cid:126)α (cid:16)(cid:126)α (cid:16)(cid:126)α (cid:16)(cid:126)α = −(cid:16) ∂U ∂2U ∂(cid:126)α2 + ∂2U ∂ (cid:126)β∂(cid:126)α ∂2U ∂(cid:126)γ∂(cid:126)α + + −(cid:126)α − (cid:126)β −(cid:126)γ ∂(cid:126)r (cid:17)s − β (cid:16)∂U ∂2U ∂ (cid:126)β∂(cid:126)r (cid:17)s ∂ (cid:126)β ∂(cid:126)θ2 + (cid:126)γ + (cid:126)γ ∂ (cid:126)β ∂2U ∂(cid:126)α∂ (cid:126)β ∂2U (cid:126)β ∂ (cid:126)β2 ∂2U ∂(cid:126)γ∂ (cid:126)β (cid:126)β + (cid:126)γ − γ ∂2U ∂(cid:126)γ∂(cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)γ (cid:16)∂U (cid:17) (cid:17) (cid:17) + ∂2U ∂(cid:126)α∂(cid:126)γ ∂2U ∂ (cid:126)β∂(cid:126)γ ∂2U ∂(cid:126)γ2 + r ∂2U ∂(cid:126)r2 − ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)r (cid:17) − ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)θ2 α ∂2U ∂(cid:126)α∂(cid:126)r + β ∂2U ∂ (cid:126)β∂(cid:126)r + γ ∂2U ∂(cid:126)γ∂(cid:126)r (cid:126)θ1 ∂ ∂(cid:126)θ1 = ∂B1 ∂(cid:126)θ1 (cid:126)ω1 37  A = ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)r ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)θ2 = ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r (cid:16) = r ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 (C.1) (C.2) (C.3) (C.4) (C.5) (C.6) −(cid:16) I −1 A (cid:16) ∂(cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)r = rI −1 A ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)θ2 = rI −1 A ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 −(cid:16) (cid:126)θ2 ∂ ∂(cid:126)θ2 = ∂B2 ∂(cid:126)θ2 (cid:126)ω2 I A(cid:126)ω1 ω1 + MA (cid:17)(cid:17)s − ω1 ω1 − 1 m α ∂2U ∂(cid:126)α∂(cid:126)r + β ∂2U ∂ (cid:126)β∂(cid:126)r + γ ∂2U ∂(cid:126)γ∂(cid:126)r ∂2U ∂(cid:126)r2 (cid:17) (C.7) (C.8) (C.9) (C.10) = −2ω1 ∂(cid:126)r ∂ (cid:126)r (cid:16)(cid:16) I A(cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)ω1 = rI −1 A (cid:17)s − ω1I A (cid:17) (cid:17)s (cid:16) ω1(cid:126)r + 2 r + + ω1r (C.11) ∂ (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)r ∂ (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)θ2 = I −1 A ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r = I −1 A ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 (cid:16) ∂ (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)ω1 = I −1 A I A(cid:126)ω1 ω1I A (cid:17)s (cid:16) (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 (cid:17) ω1 ∂ (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)θ2 = I B ∂ (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)r ∂I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2 B = I −1 B + I −1 B −(cid:16) (cid:16) ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 − I B (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 38 + (cid:126)MB ∂I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2 B (C.12) (C.13) (C.14) (C.15) + (C.16) (cid:17) ∂I B ∂(cid:126)θ2 ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)r (cid:16) − ω1 (cid:16) (cid:17) ∂ I B (cid:17)∂I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2 B ∂(cid:126)θ2 (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 (cid:17) − I −1 A ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 (cid:16) I B ∂ (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)ω1 = I −1 B (cid:16) (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 (cid:17)s(cid:17) I A(cid:126)ω1 (cid:17)s − ω1I B − I B (cid:16) − ω1I B − I B + (cid:17) + I −1 A (cid:16) (cid:16) (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 ω1I A −(cid:16) (cid:17) (cid:17)∂ I B ∂(cid:126)ω2 ∂ (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)ω2 = I −1 B Appendix C.1. Total Mass Partials of Dynamics Matrix Partials of A with respect to MT −(cid:16)∂I −1 A ∂MT = r ∂2(cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)r∂MT I A(cid:126)ω1 ω1 + I −1 ∂I −1 A ∂MT ∂I A ∂MT MT (µ − µ2) + 1 A ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r (cid:126)ω1 ω1 A + I −1 ∂I −1 A ∂MT ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r∂MT (cid:126)MA + I −1 ∂3U A (cid:17)s ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂MT ∂2U ∂(cid:126)r2 − 1 m ∂(cid:126)r2∂MT (C.17) (C.18) (C.19) (C.20) (cid:16)∂I −1 A ∂MT ∂2(cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT = r 1 + MT (µ − µ2) (cid:17) ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 + I −1 A ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT ∂3U ∂2U ∂(cid:126)r∂(cid:126)θ2 + I −1 A (cid:17)s − 1 m (cid:16) ∂I −1 (cid:17) A ∂MT −I −1 A ω1 ∂I A ∂MT ∂(cid:126)r∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT (cid:17)s − ∂I −1 A ∂MT (cid:126)ω1 (cid:16) (cid:16)∂I −1 A ∂MT = r I A(cid:126)ω1 ∂2(cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)ω1∂MT ∂2 (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)r∂MT ∂2 (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT = = ∂I −1 A ∂MT ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r + I −1 A ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r∂MT ∂I −1 A ∂MT ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 + I −1 A ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT 39 ω1I A (C.21) (C.22) (C.23) ∂2 (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)ω1∂MT = ∂I −1 A ∂MT −∂I −1 A ∂MT (cid:16) I A(cid:126)ω1 (cid:17)s + I −1 A (cid:16) ∂I A ∂MT (cid:17)s (cid:126)ω1 ω1I A − I −1 A ω1 ∂I A ∂MT ∂2 (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)r∂MT = ∂I −1 B ∂MT ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)r + I −1 B ∂2 (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)r∂MT − ∂I −1 A ∂MT ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r − I −1 A ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r∂MT ∂2 (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT = ∂I B ∂MT ((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2)ω1 ∂I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2 B ∂2I B ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT + ∂2 (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT ω1((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2) − ∂I B ∂MT −∂I −1 B ∂MT ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)θ2 − I B((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2) B − I −1 ∂2I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT B + I B((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2)ω1 B ∂I −1 ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)θ2 ∂MT − ∂ I B ∂MT ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 + (cid:126)MB B B ∂2I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT ∂2I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT ∂I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2 ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT ∂2 I B ∂(cid:126)θ2∂MT B A ((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2) − I −1 − ∂I −1 A ∂MT − I −1 −∂I −1 B ∂MT ((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2) B ((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2) (C.24) (C.25) (C.26) ∂ I B ∂(cid:126)θ2 (cid:16)(cid:16) (cid:17)s(cid:17) ∂I −1 B ∂MT ∂2 (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)ω1∂MT +I −1 = (cid:16)(cid:16) ∂I B ω1I A −(cid:16) ∂MT B (cid:16) I A(cid:126)ω1 I B((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2) (cid:17)s − ω1 (cid:16) + I −1 A ω1 ((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2) ∂I −1 A ∂MT + (cid:16) − ω1I B − I B + ((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2) ∂2 (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)ω2∂MT ∂I −1 B ∂MT = (cid:17) (cid:126)ω1 (cid:17)s − ω1I B − I B (cid:17) −(cid:16) ∂I A (cid:17) ∂I B ∂MT ∂I A ∂MT − ∂ I B ∂MT ∂MT ∂ I B ∂(cid:126)ω2 ∂2 I B ∂(cid:126)ω2∂MT −I −1 B ω1 ∂I B ∂MT − ∂ I B ∂MT + ((cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2) 40 (C.27) (cid:17)s(cid:17) (C.28) Partials of A with respect to T jkl Appendix C.2. Second Order Inertia Integral Partials of Dynamics Matrix , where i represents body A or B and j, k, l = 0 or 2 with only one index set to 2, are needed to compute the sensitivity of the eigenvalues to the mass parameters of interest. i ∂2(cid:126)r = r i ∂(cid:126)r∂T jkl I A(cid:126)ω1 ω1 + I −1 A −(cid:16) ∂I −1 A ∂T jkl i ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r∂T jkl (cid:126)MA + I −1 i A A + I −1 ∂I −1 A ∂T jkl i (C.29) (cid:17)s ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂T jkl i (cid:17) (cid:16) ∂I −1 A ∂T jkl i ∂I A ∂T jkl − 1 m i (cid:126)ω1 ω1 + ∂3U ∂ (cid:126)R2∂T jkl i (cid:16) ∂I −1 A ∂T jkl ∂2(cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl i = r ∂2(cid:126)r ∂(cid:126)ω1∂T jkl i m (cid:17) − 1 (cid:16) ∂I A (cid:17) A i ∂T jkl ∂3U 2∂T jkl ∂(cid:126)θ2 i (cid:17)s (cid:126)ω1 ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 + I −1 A ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl i (cid:17)s (cid:16) i = r (cid:16) ∂I −1 − ∂I −1 A ∂T jkl i i I A(cid:126)ω1 A ∂T jkl ω1I A − I −1 A ω1 + I −1 ∂I A ∂T jkl i ∂2 (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)r∂T jkl i = ∂I −1 A ∂T jkl i ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r + I −1 A ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r∂T jkl i ∂2 (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl i = ∂I −1 A ∂T jkl ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 + I −1 A ∂2 (cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)ω1∂T jkl i = ∂I −1 A ∂T jkl − ∂I −1 A ∂T jkl i i i (cid:16) (cid:17)s I A(cid:126)ω1 + I −1 A ω1I A − I −1 A ω1 ∂I A ∂T jkl i ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl i (cid:16) ∂I A (cid:126)ω1 ∂T jkl i (cid:17)s 41 (C.30) (C.31) (C.32) (C.33) (C.34) ∂2 (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)r∂T jkl i = ∂I −1 B ∂T jkl i ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)r + I −1 B (cid:16) (cid:16) ∂2 (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl i = ∂I B ∂T jkl − ∂I −1 B ∂T jkl i ω1 i ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r i − ∂I −1 A (cid:16) ∂T jkl (cid:16) + I B i ∂2 (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)r∂T jkl ∂I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2 (cid:17) (cid:17)∂I B ω1 B ∂(cid:126)θ2 i A − I −1 ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)r∂T jkl ∂2I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl (cid:17) (cid:17) ∂2I B ω1 B i ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl i (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 (C.35) (C.36) + ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂T jkl ∂2 (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl − ∂I −1 B ∂T jkl i i i B (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 ∂I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2 − ∂ I B (cid:16) ∂T jkl (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 i + (cid:126)MB (cid:16) (cid:17)∂ I B (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 B − I −1 B ω1 ∂2I −1 ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl (cid:17)∂I −1 (cid:16) ∂(cid:126)θ2 − I −1 B i B − ∂I −1 A (cid:16) (cid:16) ∂T jkl i ∂(cid:126)θ2 ∂ (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2 − I −1 (cid:17)(cid:17)s I B (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 +I −1 B ∂2 (cid:126)ω2 i = ∂I −1 B ∂T jkl − ∂I −1 (cid:16) B ∂T jkl i I A(cid:126)ω1 ∂(cid:126)ω1∂T jkl i − ∂I −1 A ∂T jkl i ∂2 (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)ω2∂T jkl i ∂I B ∂T jkl i ω1I B − I −1 (cid:17)s − I −1 B ω1 (cid:16) ∂I A A (cid:126)ω1 ∂T jkl i (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 ∂I −1 B ∂T jkl + − I B i ∂ (cid:126)MB ∂(cid:126)θ2 (cid:16) (cid:17) ∂2 I B (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl i (cid:17) ∂2I −1 B ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl i i A B ∂2 (cid:126)MA ∂(cid:126)θ2∂T jkl (cid:16) ∂I B + I −1 − ∂I −1 (cid:17)s B ∂T jkl I −1 ∂T jkl − ∂I −1 (cid:16) B ∂T jkl + A i i i (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 (cid:16) (cid:17)(cid:17)s (C.37) (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 i ∂T jkl I B − I −1 B ∂ I B ∂T jkl ω1I A + I −1 A ω1 i ∂I A ∂T jkl i ∂ I B ∂T jkl i (C.38) = − ∂I −1 (cid:16) B ∂T jkl − ∂I −1 B ∂T jkl i i ω1I B − I −1 B ω1 (cid:17)∂ I B ∂I B ∂T jkl − I −1 i B ∂(cid:126)ω2 (cid:126)ω1 + (cid:126)ω2 I B − I −1 (cid:17) ∂2 I B B ∂(cid:126)ω2∂T jkl i Appendix D. General Use Binary Asteroid Simulator As a part of the analysis for this paper we developed a tool for dynamical propagation of binary asteroids of arbitrary shape and expansion order using 42 Eq. 11-13 and the Hou mutual gravity potential described in Appendix A[11]. We have provided the software tool for free use at https://github.com/alex- b-davis/gubas. The tool, referred to as the General Use Binary Asteroid Simulator, is intended to provide the planetary science community with an easily used, fast, and high fidelity simulation tool for the numerical inte- gration of binary asteroid dynamics. It does not include the tools for the fundamental frequency analysis performed in this paper. The software was designed and implemented to be highly modular to en- able a wide set of uses and allow for easy integration into larger tool sets. For this reason the architecture was centered around a C++ executable wrapped in a Python shell. The C++ executable performs the numerical integra- tion and calculation of the inertia integrals while the Python wrapper pre- processes user input from a configuration file to initialize the executable and post-processes the results. This approach allows the user to easily modify the Python shell script to fit their needs. In the standard architecture all interactions are handles through the configuration file and a single command line call to initialize the process. While the software and a detailed user guide can be found by following the github link, Fig. B.11 shows a basic flowchart of the software process. Figure D.11: General Use Binary Asteroid Simulator Software Flowchart 43 References [1] K. S. Noll, W. M. Grundy, E. I. Chiang, J.-L. Margot, S. D. Kern, Binaries in the kuiper belt, arXiv preprint astro-ph/0703134. [2] J.-L. Margot, M. Nolan, L. Benner, S. Ostro, R. Jurgens, J. Giorgini, M. Slade, D. Campbell, Binary asteroids in the near-earth object pop- ulation, Science 296 (5572) (2002) 1445 -- 1448. [3] P. Pravec, P. Scheirich, P. Kusnir´ak, L. Sarounov´a, S. Mottola, G. Hahn, P. Brown, G. Esquerdo, N. Kaiser, Z. Krzeminski, et al., Photometric survey of binary near-earth asteroids, Icarus 181 (1) (2006) 63 -- 93. [4] E. G. Fahnestock, D. J. Scheeres, Simulation of the full two rigid body problem using polyhedral mutual potential and potential derivatives ap- proach, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 96 (3-4) (2006) 317 -- 339. [5] S. P. Naidu, J.-L. Margot, Near-earth asteroid satellite spins under spin -- orbit coupling, The Astronomical Journal 149 (2) (2015) 80. [6] A. J. Maciejewski, Reduction, relative equilibria and potential in the two rigid bodies problem, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 63 (1) (1995) 1 -- 28. [7] P. Tricarico, Figure -- figure interaction between bodies having arbitrary shapes and mass distributions: a power series expansion approach, Ce- lestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 100 (4) (2008) 319 -- 330. [8] D. Scheeres, Stability of the planar full 2-body problem, Celestial Me- chanics and Dynamical Astronomy 104 (1-2) (2009) 103 -- 128. [9] G. Bou´e, J. Laskar, Spin axis evolution of two interacting bodies, Icarus 201 (2) (2009) 750 -- 767. [10] J. Ashenberg, Mutual gravitational potential and torque of solid bod- ies via inertia integrals, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 99 (2) (2007) 149 -- 159. [11] X. Hou, D. J. Scheeres, X. Xin, Mutual potential between two rigid bodies with arbitrary shapes and mass distributions, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy (2016) 1 -- 27. 44 [12] Y. Takahashi, M. W. Busch, D. J. Scheeres, Spin state and moment of inertia characterization of 4179 toutatis, The Astronomical Journal 146 (4) (2013) 95. [13] A. I. Ermakov, M. T. Zuber, D. E. Smith, C. A. Raymond, G. Balmino, R. R. Fu, B. A. Ivanov, Constraints on vestas interior structure using gravity and shape models from the dawn mission, Icarus 240 (2014) 146 -- 160. [14] D. Scheeres, S. Hesar, S. Tardivel, M. Hirabayashi, D. Farnocchia, J. McMahon, S. Chesley, O. Barnouin, R. Binzel, W. Bottke, et al., The geophysical environment of bennu, Icarus 276 (2016) 116 -- 140. [15] M. W. Buie, C. B. Olkin, W. J. Merline, K. J. Walsh, H. F. Levi- son, B. Timerson, D. Herald, W. M. Owen Jr, H. B. Abramson, K. J. Abramson, et al., Size and shape from stellar occultation observations of the double jupiter trojan patroclus and menoetius, The Astronomical Journal 149 (3) (2015) 113. [16] D. Scheeres, Minimum energy configurations in the n-body problem and the celestial mechanics of granular systems, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 113 (3) (2012) 291 -- 320. [17] D. Scheeres, Relative equilibria for general gravity fields in the sphere- restricted full 2-body problem, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical As- tronomy 94 (3) (2006) 317 -- 349. [18] G. G´omez, Dynamics and Mission Design Near Libration Points. Vol. 1. Fundamentals: the Case of Collinear Libration Points (World scientific monograph series in mathematics; vol. 2), World Scientific, 2001. [19] D. J. Scheeres, Orbital motion in strongly perturbed environments: ap- plications to asteroid, comet and planetary satellite orbiters, Springer, 2016. [20] F. Nimmo, O. Umurhan, C. M. Lisse, C. J. Bierson, T. R. Lauer, M. W. Buie, H. B. Throop, J. A. Kammer, J. H. Roberts, W. B. McKinnon, et al., Mean radius and shape of pluto and charon from new horizons images, Icarus 287 (2017) 12 -- 29. 45
1907.00571	1	1907	2019-07-01T06:55:02	New constraints on the dust and gas distribution in the LkCa 15 disk from ALMA	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We search a large parameter space of the LkCa 15's disk density profile to fit its observed radial intensity profile of $^{12}$CO (J = 3-2) obtained from ALMA. The best-fit model within the parameter space has a disk mass of 0.1 $M_{\odot}$ (using an abundance ratio of $^{12}$CO/H$_2$ $=$ 1.4 $\times 10^{-4}$ in mass), an inner cavity of 45 AU in radius, an outer edge at $\sim$ 600 AU, and a disk surface density profile follows a power-law of the form $\rho_r \propto r^{-4}$. For the disk density profiles that can lead to a small reduced $\chi^2$ of goodness-of-fit, we find that there is a clear linear correlation between the disk mass and the power-law index $\gamma$ in the equation of disk density profile. This suggests that the $^{12}$CO disk of LkCa 15 is optically thick and we can fit its $^{12}$CO radial intensity profile using either a lower disk mass with a smaller $\gamma$ or a higher disk mass with a bigger $\gamma$. By comparing the $^{12}$CO channel maps of the best-fit model with disk models with higher or lower masses, we find that a disk mass of $\sim$ 0.1 $M_{\odot}$ can best reproduce the observed morphology of the $^{12}$CO channel maps. The dust continuum map at 0.87 mm of the LkCa 15 disk shows an inner cavity of the similar size of the best-fit gas model, but its out edge is at $\sim$ 200 AU, much smaller than the fitted gas disk. Such a discrepancy between the outer edges of the gas and dust disks is consistent with dust drifting and trapping models.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version July 2, 2019 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX62 9 1 0 2 l u J 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 1 7 5 0 0 . 7 0 9 1 : v i X r a New constraints on the dust and gas distribution in the LkCa 15 disk from ALMA Sheng Jin,1 Andrea Isella,2 Pinghui Huang,1, 2, 3, 4 Shengtai Li,3 Hui Li,3 and Jianghui Ji1 1CAS Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA 3Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, Peoples Republic of China (Received March 25, 2019) Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT We search a large parameter space of the LkCa 15's disk density profile to fit its observed radial intensity profile of 12CO (J = 3-2) obtained from ALMA. The best-fit model within the parameter space has a disk mass of 0.1 M(cid:12) (using an abundance ratio of 12CO/H2 = 1.4 ×10−4 in mass), an inner cavity of 45 AU in radius, an outer edge at ∼ 600 AU, and a disk surface density profile follows a power-law of the form ρr ∝ r−4. For the disk density profiles that can lead to a small reduced χ2 of goodness-of-fit, we find that there is a clear linear correlation between the disk mass and the power-law index γ in the equation of disk density profile. This suggests that the 12CO disk of LkCa 15 is optically thick and we can fit its 12CO radial intensity profile using either a lower disk mass with a smaller γ or a higher disk mass with a bigger γ. By comparing the 12CO channel maps of the best-fit model with disk models with higher or lower masses, we find that a disk mass of ∼ 0.1 M(cid:12) can best reproduce the observed morphology of the 12CO channel maps. The dust continuum map at 0.87 mm of the LkCa 15 disk shows an inner cavity of the similar size of the best-fit gas model, but its out edge is at ∼ 200 AU, much smaller than the fitted gas disk. Such a discrepancy between the outer edges of the gas and dust disks is consistent with dust drifting and trapping models. Keywords: stars: individual (LkCa 15) -- protoplanetary disks -- radiative transfer -- submillimeter: planetary systems 1. INTRODUCTION Recently, a large number of protoplanetary disks were spatially resolved by the Atacama Large Millime- ter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and the Next Generation Very Large Array (ngVLA)(ALMA Partnership et al. 2015; Fedele et al. 2017; Andrews et al. 2018; Isella et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2018). These high-resolution observations of protoplanetary disks in dust continuum and molecular line emissions provide us the morphology of dust and gas distributions in a wide variety of protoplanetary disks. Such information places fundamental constraints for the theo- retical studies on dust properties and dust-gas interaction, which is an important building block of planet formation theory (Dong et al. 2015; Isella et al. 2016; Jin et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2018; Dong et al. 2018; Huang et al. 2018; Ricci et al. 2018; Huang et al. 2019). LkCa 15 is a 2-5 Myr old K5 star with L(cid:63) ∼ 0.74 L(cid:12) and M(cid:63) ∼ 1.0 M(cid:12) (Kenyon & Hartmann 1995; Simon et al. 2000). It is located in the Taurus-Auriga star-forming region at a distance of 140 pc from the Earth(van den Ancker et al. 1998). LkCa 15 is an interesting target due to its partially dust-depleted disk (Pi´etu et al. 2006; Espaillat et al. 2007; Thalmann et al. 2010; Andrews et al. 2011; Isella et al. 2012, 2014; Thalmann et al. 2014) and the probability of harboring a planet candidate inside its inner cavity (Kraus & Ireland 2012; Sallum et al. 2015; Thalmann et al. 2016; Corresponding author: Sheng Jin [email protected] 2 Jin et al. Currie et al. 2019). The depleted inner region shown in the dust continuum image is about 50 AU in radius (Pi´etu et al. 2006; Andrews et al. 2011; Isella et al. 2012, 2014), and it has a mass accretion rate of about 10−9 M(cid:12)yr−1(Hartmann et al. 1998). The outer edge of the dust disk inferred from continuum emission is at ∼ 150 AU(Pi´etu et al. 2007; Isella et al. 2012). The dust mass estimated from 1.3 mm continuum observation is about 5 × 10−4 M(cid:12)(Isella et al. 2012). Recent images of scattered light suggest a warped inner disk component inside the inner gap, providing a clear picture details of the inner gap region of the LkCa 15 disk (Thalmann et al. 2015, 2016; Oh et al. 2016). As a young star, LkCa 15 is a luminous source of X-ray and EUV emission(Skinner & Gudel 2013), indicating that the LkCa 15 disk could still be undergoing the active evolution phase of disk physics and chemistry. Consequently, the protoplanetary disk of LkCa 15 has been found to be especially chemically rich and has been detected in several molecular transitions(Thi et al. 2004; Pi´etu et al. 2007; Chapillon et al. 2008; Oberg et al. 2010; Punzi et al. 2015). Molecular line emission shows that the gas disk around LkCa 15 is in size of ∼ 900 AU(Pi´etu et al. 2007; Isella et al. 2012). It is highly optically thick in the emission of 12CO, but optically thin in 13CO emission(Punzi et al. 2015; van der Marel et al. 2015). The discrepancy between the outer disk radii shown in the dust continuum and molecular line emissions (∼ 150 AU versus 900 AU) suggests that the mm-size dust is depleted in the outer part of the LkCa 15 disk, which is in consistence with dust drifting and trapping models(Birnstiel et al. 2010; Pinilla et al. 2012). Being a protoplanetary disk that may have a young planet candidate, the LkCa 15 system serves as a unique laboratory to study the dust evolution models under planet-disk interaction(Zhu et al. 2011; Pinilla et al. 2012). The distribution of dust and gas in the LkCa 15 disk provides an important constraint on theoretic models. Here, we fit the gas and dust surface density profiles based on the high-resolution dust continuum image and CO 3-2 line maps obtained from the ALMA. We study how the goodness-of-fit changes along with different key parameters used in the disk density profile, which is related with different physics. Our disk model and the parameter grid is described In Section 4, we show the best-fit model with respect to the observed 12CO image. We discuss the in Section 3. dependence of parameters in Section 5. 2. OBSERVATION The LkCa 15 was observed at August 17 and August 29, 2014 with ALMA Band 7 (345 GHz, 880 µm) in ALMA program 2012.1.00870.S (PI P´erez, L. M.). The 12CO, 13CO and C18O 3-2 line maps and 0.87 mm dust continuum image were taken with two different tunings. The 12CO 32 data were obtained with a spectral window centered on 345.796 GHz, with 1885 channels of 122.06 kHz (0.106 km s−1) channel width. The angular resolution of the 12CO image is 0.36.(cid:48)(cid:48)×0.23.(cid:48)(cid:48) (50 AU x 32 AU). The 13CO 32 data were centered on 330.588 GHz, with 1967 channels of 122.06 kHz (0.11 km s−1) channel width. The angular resolution of the 13CO image is 0.28.(cid:48)(cid:48)×0.21.(cid:48)(cid:48) (40 AU x 30 AU). The C18O 32 data were centered on 329.331 GHz, with 1967 channels of 122.06 kHz (0.111 km s−1) channel width. The angular resolution of the C18O image is 0.30.(cid:48)(cid:48)×0.23.(cid:48)(cid:48) (41 AU x 32 AU). The dust continuum observation consists of four spectral windows(334.01∼335.99 GHz, 339.02∼341.00 GHz, 341.02∼343.00 GHz, 346.01∼347.99 GHz). Each spectral window has 64 channels of 31248.22kHz (3527.09 km s−1) channel width. The angular resolution of the dust continuum image is 0.23.(cid:48)(cid:48)×0.17.(cid:48)(cid:48) (32 AU x 23 AU). This is the first comprehensive observation of the CO 3-2 line emission of 12CO, 13CO and C18O in the LkCa 15 disk. Previous observations revealed the line emission of various molecules in the LkCa 15 disk, including the 12CO 6-5(van der Marel et al. 2015), CO 2-1 and HCO+(Qi et al. 2003; Pi´etu et al. 2007; Punzi et al. 2015), S-bearing molecules(Dutrey et al. 2011), and ethynyl radical (CCH)(Henning et al. 2010). The 12CO 2-1 line emission shows that the LkCa 15 disk is highly optically thick in 12CO(Punzi et al. 2015), and the 12CO 6-5 emission show that gas is still present inside the observed dust cavity(van der Marel et al. 2015). The dust continuum image has also been obtained by several former millimeter observations(Pi´etu et al. 2006; Espaillat et al. 2007; Isella et al. 2012, 2014), and all these observations show an inner dust cavity of ∼ 40-50 AU in size. 2.1. Dust continuum and line maps Figure 1 shows the dust continuum and the 12CO zero-moment maps of the LkCa 15 system. We will extract an azimuthal averaged flux from these zero-moment maps along the radial direction, and use the derived 12CO radial intensity profile as a reference to judge the goodness-of-fit of our disk models. The dust continuum map shows an inner hole of ∼ 65 AU in radius, and the full width at half maximum of this dust cavity is at ∼ 40 AU. This is in agreement with previous millimeter observations(Andrews et al. 2011; Isella et al. 2012, 2014). Such a large inner cavity disappears in the zero-moment map of 12CO. For the optically thin 13CO and C18O emissions, the inner disk show an LkCa 15 manuscript 3 obvious decrease in the azimuthal averaged flux. The zero-moment maps of 12CO, 13CO and C18O are consistent with previous findings that the LkCa 15 disk is optically thick in 12CO emission, while optically thin in 13CO and C18O. Figure 2 shows the observed channel maps of 12CO, 13CO and C18O of the LkCa 15 disk. The channel maps of 12CO clearly show the near and far halves of a double cone structure, which is the feature resulted from a circular Keplerian rotational disk(Rosenfeld et al. 2013). However, we do not observe such a feature in the channel maps of the optically thin 13CO and C18O due to lower masses of these two isotopes. 3. MODELING 3.1. surface density profile and parameter grid Our primary goal here is to find a gas disk surface density profile that can best reproduce the observed zero-moment 12CO map. First, we create a parameter space by parameterizing the surface density equation of an analytical disk model. Then, we search the parameter space to obtain the best-fit model that has the least reduced χ2 of the radial intensity profile of 12CO emission. The observed radial intensity profiles of CO isotopes and dust continuum emission in the LkCa 15 disk were obtained by extracting the azimuthal averaged intensity of the zero-moment maps shown in Figure 1. The radial intensity profiles of CO are extended to ∼ 600 AU, while the dust continuum emission shows a ring-shape structure and ends at ∼ 200 AU. The dust continuum and the CO line emissions cannot be fitted using a single surface density profile. Thus we use two separate equations to describe the surface density profiles of dust and gas in the LkCa 15 disk. We employ parameterized analytical disk surface density profiles to model the gas and dust in the LkCa 15 disk. For the gas, we adopt a surface density profile that is described by Σg(r) = Σ0 arctan(r/RCarctan)γarctan , (1) (cid:16) r (cid:17)−γ RC which is a simple power-law density profile combined with an inner cavity described by an arctangent function. We turn off the exponential decay term that are typically used to describe the surface density of protoplanetary disks (e.g., Andrews et al. 2009) because the intensity of CO line emissions decrease slowly at larger radii. Moreover, we fix the RC at 12500 AU to slow down the decrease of the gas density at the outer part of the disk. There are four free parameters in Equation 1: Σ0 that determines the disk mass, γ the power-law decay of the surface density in the radial direction, RCarctan the size of the inner cavity, and γarctan the slope of the junction region between the inner cavity and the outer disk. We set up a four-dimensional parameter space of these four free parameters. The parameter grids at each dimension are listed in Table 1. The dust surface density profile is described by Σd(r) = Σ0 exp[−(r/RC)2−γ] arctan(r/RCarctan)γarctan (2) (cid:16) r (cid:17)−γ RC Compared with the surface density profile of the gas disk, there is an exponential decay term in the dust density profile to simulate the disappearance of the dust intensity at larger radii. Since we have to subtract the dust continuum emission in generating the 12CO images for all the models in the parameter space listed by Table 1, we adopt a fixed dust density profile of RC = 66 AU, γ = −0.15, RCarctan = 66 AU, γarctan = 5.35, and a total dust mass of Mdust = 9.8 × 10−5M(cid:12). These values are determined by fitting the azimuthal averaged radial intensity profile of the observed dust continuum map, and they are used for all the 4096 runs in the parameter space. 3.2. physical model The first step to derive the 12CO intensity from a specific gas surface density profile is to calculate the three- dimensional disk temperature structure. For each gas surface density profile in the parameter space, We use an iterative approach to obtain a self-consistent three-dimensional disk temperature structure. We assume the disk temperature structure is controlled by micron-size dust particles that are well coupled with gas. Since the vertical distribution of micron-size dust is in turn determined by the disk temperature structure, this is a circular dependency problem. To solve this problem, first we generate an initial three-dimensional micron-size dust distribution, and calculate an initial disk temperature based on this dust distribution. Using the calculated disk temperature, we produce a new micron-size dust distribution by solving the differential equation of hydrostatic equilibrium: − ∂ ln ρgas ∂z = ∂ ln Tgas ∂z + 1 2 cs (cid:20) GM∗z (cid:21) (r2 + z2)3/2 , (3) 4 Jin et al. 2 = kBTgas/µmh is the sound speed. We then run Monte Carlo radiation transfer simulation to calculate a new where cs disk temperature structure using the updated dust distribution. We repeat this process until the three-dimensional disk temperature structure used in generating a dust distribution and the disk temperature structure calculated by the same dust distribution converge (the difference between two temperature structures is within 3% everywhere). The disk temperature structure and the dust continuum and CO line maps are calculated using the Monte Carlo radiative transfer code RADMC-3D(Dullemond 2012). We assume the host star of LkCa 15 is a black-body radiator with an effective temperature of 4350 K. The surface density of micron-size dust in the calculation of the disk tem- perature profile is obtained by a dust-to-gas ratio of 0.001. Compared to the Milky Way average ratio of 0.01 (Bohlin et al. 1978), by setting such a small dust-to-gas ratio we assume that substantial grain growth has occurred in the LkCa 15 disk and the micron-size dust is about 10% in mass of the total dust. Submillimeter and dust continuum observations show that dust grain growth to mm-size particles is completed within less than 1 Myr for the majority of circumstellar disks(Rodmann et al. 2006; Draine 2006; Ricci et al. 2010a,b, 2011; Ubach et al. 2012), and simulation of dust evolution also shows mm-size dust can form at the age of ∼ 1 Myr at high density region in protoplanetary disk(Ormel et al. 2009). As aforementioned, the LkCa 15 disk is about 2-5 Myr in age(Kenyon & Hartmann 1995; Simon et al. 2000), thus a large fraction of dust can appear to be in large sizes at this stage. The dust opacities used in this work were calculated similar to that of Isella et al. (2009). We assume the dust grains are compact spheres made of astronomical silicates (Weingartner & Draine 2001), organic carbonates (Zubko et al. 1996), and water ice, with fractional abundances described in Pollack et al. (1994). Single grain opacities were averaged on a grain size distribution to obtain the mean opacity. We adopt a typical MNR power-law size distribution (Mathis et al. 1977), n(a) ∝ a−3.5, between a minimum grain size of 5× 10−6 mm and a maximum grain size of 1× 10−2 mm. The resulting dust opacity at the wavelength of 1 µm is 5.2 × 103 cm2 g−1. After we have obtained a self-consistent three-dimensional disk temperature structure, we calculate the dust con- tinuum and 12CO line emission. We interpolate the surface density profile of mm-size dust given by Equation 2 on a three-dimensional spherical grid with a scale height profile of hmm−dust(r) = 0.1 × 1.0AU × (r/20AU)1.25, where 0.1 is a parameter that accounts for the settling of 0.15 millimeter size dust towards the mid-plane. This results in a scale height of ∼ 0.75 AU at 100 AU for relatively large dust particles. Such a scale height is consistent with the findings by Pinte et al. (2015). The dust opacity adopted for mm-size dust is calculated using the same model of the opacity for micron-size dust, the only difference is that here the maximum grain size is 1 mm. The resulting dust opacity at the wavelength of 1 mm is 13.2 cm2 g−1. We convolve the dust continuum map in each model with the PSF of the ALMA observation and extract an azimuthal averaged radial intensity profile. Then we calculate the reduced χ2 for dust continuum emission between the radial intensity profiles of the model and the ALMA observation. For different models in our parameter space, the goodness-of-fit of the dust continuum emission changes due to the variation of disk temperature. But we find that the influence of dust continuum map on the zero-moment 12CO map is limited, because the dust continuum image has a ring-like structure that located at the optically thick region of the 12CO emission. To calculate the line emission of 12CO, we assume the abundance ratio of 12CO/H2 to be 1.4 ×10−4 in mass, and this value is consistent with the canonical ratio of 104 for the disk initial conditions(Lacy et al. 1994; France et al. 2014). Then we create a three-dimensional density structure of 12CO based on the gas surface density profile of each run by solving the Equation 3. We include the freeze-out effect of CO by setting the number density of 12CO to zero at the region where temperature is below 20 K. Photodissociation by stellar UV and/or X-ray radiation is another important factor as it can destroy the CO in the surface layers of the disk(Visser et al. 2009). We follow the same procedure as in that of Qi et al. (2011) and Rosenfeld et al. (2013), in which we calculate a photodissociation boundary by vertically integrating the H nuclei density to a threshold density of 2.0 ×1020. This is a mild threshold compared to the value of 5.0 ×1020 used in Rosenfeld et al. (2013). We find that it is hard to fit the 12CO intensity beyond ∼ 400 AU using a larger photodissociation threshold like 5.0 ×1020 in H nuclei, because with such a strong photodissociation rate there are little 12CO in the outer disk. The photodissociation threshold turns out to be an alternative free parameter in the fitting of the 12CO radial intensity profile, as it is a critical parameter for the 12CO intensity in the outer disk. In this work, we fix the photodissociation threshold of 2.0 ×1020 for all the 4096 runs. We first calculate the self-consistent disk temperature. Then we calculate the dust continuum map and the channel maps of 12CO, and convolve these images with the corresponding ALMA PSFs. Afterwards we subtract the dust continuum map from each channel map, and integrate all the channel maps to generate a zero-moment map of 12CO. Finally, we subtract an azimuthal averaged radial intensity profile from the zero-moment 12CO map and calculate the corresponding reduced χ2 of 12CO emission. LkCa 15 manuscript 5 In addition, once we obtain the best-fit parameter sets for the 12CO emission, we tentatively adjust the abundance ratio of 12CO/13CO to fit the radial intensity profile of 13CO, using the same disk temperature profile given by the best-fit 12CO model. The observed 13CO radial intensity profile shows a peak at ∼ 45 AU, although there is no such a peak in the radial intensity profile of 12CO (the radial intensity profiles of 12CO and 13CO can be found in Section 4). Hence, we have to adopt different abundance ratios of 12CO/13CO for the disk region inside or outside of 45 AU. Although the fitting process of 13CO is not a self-consistent approach, the result can at least be an estimation of the number density of 13CO. We do not model the C18O disk because the signal-to-noise ratio is low and no flux are detected outside of 200 AU. 4. THE BEST-FIT MODEL 4.1. 12CO intensity profile The best-fit model in our parameter space has the following parameters: Mdisk = 0.1M(cid:12), γ = 4.0, RCarctan = 45 AU, and γarctan = 10. Although the fitted disk mass is relatively large, it agrees with previous findings(Isella et al. 2012; Huang et al. 2017). Figure 3 shows the gas surface density profile of this best-fit model, which is related to a power-law disk without an exponential decay term usually used in the description of protoplanetary disks (e.g., Andrews et al. 2009). Figure 4 gives the self-consistent temperature structure as calculated by our iterative approach that was described in Section 3.2. It shows a typical two-layer vertical structure of passive irradiated circumstellar disks (Dullemond et al. 2002). In the surface layer, the temperature decreases from ∼ 51 K at 100 AU to ∼ 29 K at 500 AU. In the mid-plane, the temperature decreases from ∼ 15 K at 100 AU to ∼ 11 K at 500 AU. The top panel of Figure 5 compares the azimuthal averaged radial intensity profiles extracted from the zero-moment 12CO maps of our best-fit model with the ALMA observation. The best-fit model results in a reduced χ2 of 2.51. Its gas surface density profile has an inner cavity of 45 AU in size. However, we do not see such a cavity in the resulting radial intensity profile, since most of the inner cavity is optically thick in 12CO emission. In fact, for a majority part of the gas density profiles in our parameter space, the inner disk region is optically thick in 12CO emission and its intensity only depends on the calculated disk temperature. Although the very inner part of the disk cavity can become optically thin due to the arctangent function used in the surface density equation, this inner optically thin region did not show up in the radial intensity profile because of the large PSF of the ALMA observation, which is of ∼ 50 AU in major axis and ∼ 32 AU in minor axis. The observed 12CO intensity decreases slowly in the outer optically thin part of the disk. We find that it is hard to fit the slope of the 12CO radial intensity profile in the entire disk using a simple power-law surface density. Our best-fit model has a large γ of 4.0. It fits the inner ∼ 400 AU very well, but beyond ∼ 400 AU it shows lower intensity compared to the ALMA observation. Note that the photodissociation threshold can be another free parameter in our model that can affect the intensity in the outer part of the disk. In order to slow down the decrease of the 12CO intensity beyond ∼ 400 AU, we set a photodissociation threshold of 2.0 ×1020 in H nuclei to keep more 12CO in the outer disk, which is a mild threshold compared to the value of 5.0 ×1020 used in Rosenfeld et al. (2013). Different photodissociation thresholds will result in different best-fit parameter sets. In Figure 6 and 7 we show the dust continuum map, the 12CO zero-moment map, and the 12CO channel maps of our best-fit model. Rather than interpolating the Fourier transformation of our model images to the actual observation dataset and cleaning the dataset to get exactly the same PSF of ALMA, we simply convolve a Gaussian function of the same sizes of major and minor axes with the ALMA observation to speed up our fitting process. Thus, compared to Figure 1 and 2, our model images are more smooth than the ALMA observation. For the calculation of reduced χ2, we only use the azimuthal averaged intensity profile. We notice that the channel maps provide important constraints on the goodness of fitting. In the 12CO channel maps shown in Figure 7, we can clearly see the near and far halves of a double cone structure of a Keplerian disk, and the relative angle and magnitude of the near and far halves share similarities with the observed structure shown in Figure 2. These similarities between the channel maps of our best-fit model and the observed channel maps suggest that the mass of LkCa 15 disk is around 0.1 M(cid:12) under the assumption that the abundance ratio of 12CO/H2 is ∼ 1.4 ×10−4 in mass. The fitting of the outer disk is not good as the disk size is smaller in the channel maps shown in Figure 7, while the observed channel maps in Figure 2 exhibits more extended images. This difficulty is due to the simple power-law surface density profile and the identical radial photodissociation threshold used in our model. We will investigate the effect of different disk masses in Section 5.2. Note that the fitted disk mass depends on the abundance ratio of 12CO/H2 in our model. If we adopt a larger abundance ratio of 12CO/H2 of ∼ 3.0 ×10−4 in mass, the fitted mass of the LkCa 15 disk should be around 0.05 M(cid:12). 6 Jin et al. The bottom panel of Figure 5 compares the azimuthal averaged radial intensity profile of the dust continuum emission of our best-fit model with the ALMA observation. The observation bias for dust continuum image is small, as shown by the small error-bar in the observed radial intensity profile. As a result, the radial intensity profile extracted from the dust continuum image of our best-fit model has a large reduced χ2 of 255. But the two intensity profiles of the best-fit model and the ALMA observation generally match. The χ2 of dust continuum emission can be largely reduced by further fine tuning the dust surface density profile. 4.2. 13CO image Based on the surface density profile and the temperature structure of the best-fit model of 12CO, we manually adjust the abundance ratio of 12CO/13CO to fit the observed 13CO intensity. This actually exhibits the 13CO emission at the temperature profile given by the gas density profile obtained by the fitting of 12CO, and it is not a self-consistent way as compared to the fitting of 12CO intensity. We adopt this simplified approach only to estimate the mass of 13CO needed to reproduce the observed 13CO image based on the disk properties of the fitted 12CO disk. We use a power-law function to describe the radius-dependent abundance ratios of 12CO/13CO: (cid:16) r (cid:17)α η(r) = n0 45AU , (4) where η(r) is the abundance ratio at r, and n0 is the abundance ratio at 45 AU. We separately fit the α for the inner and outer disk regions by manually adjusting n0 and α. We obtained a n0 of 6360, α = -4.0 for the disk region inside of 45 AU, and α = 1.7 outside of 45 AU. This leads to 12CO/13CO = 1, 248, and 6360 at 5, 20, and 45 AU, and 12CO/13CO = 1640, 500, 155 and 78 at 100, 200, 400 and 600 AU. Since the γ in the best-fit 12CO disk is 4, we can infer that the number density profile of 13CO is of the form r−2.3 outside of 45 AU. This could partly explain why it is difficult to fit the 12CO intensity in the outer disk using a surface density profile that is of the form r−4, given that the number density profile fitted from the optically thin 13CO is of r−2.3. But if we use a surface density profile that is of the form r−2.3, the fitted disk mass will be around 10−3 to 10−2 M(cid:12) (see Section 5.1 for details). Such a low mass can not reproduce the morphology of the observed 12CO channel maps as shown in Section 5.2. Thus it is difficult to fit the 12CO intensity in the inner and outer disk regions using a simple power-law radial density profile. Figure 5 shows the radial intensity profile of 13CO compared with the ALMA observation. The reduced χ2 of 13CO is derived to be 0.33. The zero-moment and channel maps of 13CO obtained from the aforementioned fitted abundance ratios are shown in Figure 6 and 7. The fitted zero-moment map of 13CO has an inner cavity, which means the disk becomes optically thin at the wavelengths of 13CO line emissions. The observed zero-moment map of 13CO does not show a distinct inner cavity, but we can see an obvious decrease of the intensity in the inner disk region. For the channel maps, since the mass of 13CO is much lower than the 12CO, we do not see the near and far halves of a double cone structure as shown in the channel maps of 12CO. The morphology of the 13CO channel maps agrees well with the observation. 5. A PARAMETER STUDY 5.1. dependence of parameters We aim to investigate how the fitting of the 12CO intensity changes with different parameters. For this, we plot in Figure 8 the heat maps of the reduced χ2 of the models that have at least two equal parameters with our best-fit model. For example, The top left panel shows the 64 models that have the same RCarctan and γarctan as the best-fit model (marked with a green circle). We see that for the models that have relatively lower reduced χ2, where they show a clear linear correlation between the Mdisk and γ. This means that we can find a reasonable fit of the observed 12CO intensity using either a low disk mass with a small γ or a high disk mass with a large γ. This relation can be explained as follows. For most of our 4096 models, the inner part of the disk (inside of ∼ 300 AU) is optically thick for the line emission of 12CO. As a result, the disk temperature profile determines the observed intensity in the inner part of the disk. Since all 64 runs in this panel have the same RCarctan and γarctan, they will have similar disk temperature structures in the inner part of the disk. Thus the key factor to obtain a good fit for these 64 runs is to derive the right intensity in the outer disk region. This means that in the case of a high mass disk, we only need to reduce the mass at the outer disk region to obtain low intensity there to fit the observed 12CO emission. According to Equation 1, to achieve this point, we can set a large γ to decrease the disk surface density quickly at large radii. In Figure 5 we also plot the intensity profiles of two disks that has a higher disk mass of of 0.33 M(cid:12) or a lower disk mass of 0.033 LkCa 15 manuscript 7 M(cid:12), as compared to the best-fit model. The intensity profiles of these three models in the inner 100 AU overlap each other. The high-mass model result in a reduced χ2 of 14.6, and the low-mass model result in a reduced χ2 of 6.7. The difference between three models is the goodness-of-fit at the outer disk region. We will show in Section 5.2 that the goodness of these three models can also be clearly observed in the morphology of the 12CO channel maps. The top right panel of Figure 8 shows the 64 models that have the same γ and γarctan with our best-fit model. This panel shows that for the disks that have a small inner cavity (with size < 10 AU), they cannot reproduce the observed 12CO intensity. Only models that have an inner cavity of ∼ 30-60 AU can possibly obtain a small reduced χ2. Furthermore, we can see in the case that the γ, γarctan and Mdisk are fixed, the goodness-of-fit shows weak correlation to the size of the inner cavity (RCarctan). On the other hand, when the γ, γarctan and RCarctan are fixed, the goodness of fitting shows weak correlation to the disk mass, since the 12CO emission is optically thick. The middle left panel of Figure 8 shows the 64 models that have the same Mdisk and γarctan with the best-fit model. The row with γ = 4 shows again that the size of the inner cavity plays a less important role in the goodness of fitting. The essential part in the fitting of the 12CO intensity is to find a combination of γ and Mdisk that can fit the outer part of the disk. If this goal is achieved, then we can obtain a model that fit the observation, regardless small changes in γarctan and RCarctan. The middle right panel of Figure 8 shows how the reduced χ2 depends on γarctan and RCarctan, i.e., the size of the inner cavity and the slope of the connection region between the inner cavity and outer disk. It confirms that these two parameters have weak effect on the goodness-of-fit of the 12CO intensity. However, there should be a large inner cavity. As it shows that an inner cavity of size < 20 AU do not reproduce the observed 12CO intensity. The bottom two panels of Figure 8 shows how the reduced χ2 changes in the γ versus γarctan space and the Mdisk versus γarctan space. The left panel shows that if the Mdisk is fixed, then the γ determines the goodness-of-fit. On the contrary, the right panel shows that if the γ is fixed, the Mdisk determines the goodness-of-fit. For the γarctan, here we see again that it has a very limited effect on the goodness-of-fit. Therefore, we may conclude that the most important part in obtaining a good fit is to find a combination of Mdisk and γ. 5.2. Constraint on the disk mass The best-fit model in our parameter space has a disk mass of 0.1 M(cid:12), a γ of 4.0, and an inner cavity of 45 AU. We have seen in Section 5.1 that the goodness-of-fit is affected by different combination of parameters, as the top left panel in Figure 8 shows that by adjusting the γ, we can obtain reasonable fits with higher or lower disk masses. Here we investigate how much our model constrains the mass of the LkCa 15 disk. We choose three models from the top left panel in Figure 8, the best-fit model, a high-mass disk model of 0.33 M(cid:12) and a low-mass model of 0.033 M(cid:12) (these three models are marked with a green, brown and blue circle respectively). The radial intensity profiles of three models shown in Figure 5, and the high-mass or low-mass model either over-produce or under-produce the intensity out of ∼ 100 AU. Since the radial intensity profile is extracted from the zero-moment map that is actually a degenerated image obtained by combining all the channel maps in an actual observation, we expect the difference of these models can also be observed in the channel maps. In Figure 9 we compare the three models' channel maps with the ALMA observation, where all the channel maps are plotted in the same colorbar. The most apparent difference between three models is the size of the channel maps. Since we have seen in Figure 5 that the high-mass and low-mass model result in either higher or lower intensity in the outer part of the disk, they either show larger or smaller size in the channel maps compared with the best-fit model. There is another feature that can be used as an effective criteria for the goodness-of-fit of the disk mass, i.e., the morphology of the near and far halves of a double cone structure of a Keplerian disk. For example, in the channel map at the velocity of ± 1.05km/s, the high-mass model shows a too much intense far halve in the double cone structure compared to the observation, while the low-mass model shows a much smaller double cone structure since it under-produce the intensity at the out disk region. In the channel maps at the velocity of ± 0.63 and ± 0.42km/s, the two short wings of the double cone structure in the high-mass model are too strong compared to the observation. Thus, the inability of the high-mass and low-mass model in fitting the intensity in the outer disk region also exhibits in the morphology of the double cone structure in the channel maps. They show a double cone structure that is either too strong or too weak compared to the observed channel maps. The mm-size dust surface density profile that can reproduce the observed dust continuum map is significantly different compared to the fitted gas surface density profile, and this is a reliable result because of the small observational bias of the dust continuum emission. The mm-size dust density profile has a peak at ∼ 65 AU, indicating a pressure bump Jin et al. 8 exists at the same location in the gas disk. The full width at half maximum of this dust cavity is at ∼ 40 AU, similar as the inner cavity of the fitted gas disk. The mm-size dust disk has an outer edge at ∼ 200 AU, which is much smaller compared to the fitted gas disk of ∼ 600 AU in size. Such a discrepancy between the gas and dust disks provides an important constraint of the dust drifting models in the LkCa 15 system. Our mm-size dust disk is of ∼ 1.0 ×10−4 M(cid:12) in mass. According to our dust opacity model, the opacity at mm wavelength is mainly contributed by dust of ∼ 0.15 mm is size. This suggests a dust-to-gas ratio of ∼ 0.001 for dust of ∼ 0.15 mm in size. But this is a weak constraint because we adopt a uniform opacity model for dusts at different distances. In reality, the species and the size distribution of dust should change at different radii, and this will affect the calculated dust opacity and consequently the fitted dust masses at different radii. 6. CONCLUSIONS In this work, we analyze the dust continuum and 12CO 3-2 line emission maps of the LkCa 15 disk that are obtained from ALMA observation. We parameterize an analytical surface density profile of the LkCa 15 disk and search through the parameter space to find the best-fit gas surface density model that leads to the least reduced χ2 of the 12CO intensity. Our key findings are summarized as follows: 1. The best-fit model of the gas disk based on 12CO 3-2 line emission is a disk of 0.1 M(cid:12) in mass. The gas disk has an inner cavity of 45 AU in size, and its outer edge is at ∼ 600 AU. The surface density profile of this best-fit model follows a power-law of the form ρr ∝ r−4. But such a steep power-law density profile results in lower 12CO intensity at outer part of the disk beyond ∼ 400 AU compared to the observation. 2, The dust continuum map can be reproduced by a dust disk which has an inner cavity of ∼ 65 AU in size, and the full width at half maximum of this cavity is ∼ 40 AU. The size of the dust cavity is similar to the size of the fitted gas cavity. Unlike the gas disk, the mm-size dust disk ends at ∼ 200 AU. The discrepancy between the outer edges of the gas and dust disks can be used to study the dust drifting models in the LkCa 15 disk. 3, The heat maps of the reduced χ2 of different models show a linear correlation between the Mdisk and γ for the models that have a reasonable goodness-of-fit of the radial intensity profile of 12CO. This means that we can fit the observed 12CO intensity using either a lower disk mass with a smaller γ or higher disk mass with bigger γ. Because the inner disk region is optically thick, and the key factor to derive a good fit is to adjust the density profile in the outer disk region to obtain consistent intensity there. 4, The morphology of the 12CO channel maps are important constraints of the disk mass. In our parameter space, although there are some models with higher or lower disk masses that can result in a reasonable reduced χ2, their channel maps show a double cone structure that is either too strong or too weak compared to the ALMA observation. The best-fit model with a disk mass of ∼ 0.1 M(cid:12) can best reproduce the observed channel maps. This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#2012.1.00870.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. S.J. and J.J. acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 11503092, 11773081, 11661161013, 11573073, 11633009), the CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team, the Strategic Priority Research Program on Space Science, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. XDA15020302 and the Foundation of Minor Planets of Purple Mountain Observatory. A.I. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation through grant No. AST-1715719 and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration support from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through grant No. 80HQTR18T0061 and the Center for Space and Earth Science at LANL. We thank the referee for comments that helped to improve the manuscript. Software: RADMC-3D v0.41(Dullemond 2012), CASA ALMA pipeline 5.4.0 ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C. L., P´erez, L. M., et al. Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., Qi, C., & 2015, ApJL, 808, L3 Dullemond, C. P. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1502 REFERENCES LkCa 15 manuscript 9 Andrews, S. M., Rosenfeld, K. A., Wilner, D. J., & Bremer, M. 2011, ApJL, 742, L5 Kraus, A. L., & Ireland, M. J. 2012, ApJ, 745, 5 Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., P´erez, L. M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 217, 425 869, L41 Oberg, K. I., Qi, C., Fogel, J. K. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., & Brauer, F. 2010, A&A, 480 513, A79 Ormel, C. W., Paszun, D., Dominik, C., et al. 2009, A&A, Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 502, 845 224, 132 Oh, D., Hashimoto, J., Tamura, M., et al. 2016, PASJ, 68, Chapillon, E., Guilloteau, S., Dutrey, A., & Pi´etu, V. 2008, L3 A&A, 488, 565 Currie, T., Marois, C., Cieza, L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 877, L3 Dong, R., Zhu, Z., & Whitney, B. 2015, ApJ, 809, 93 Dong, R., Li, S., Chiang, E., & Li, H. 2018, ApJ, 866, 110 Draine, B. T. 2006, ApJ, 636, 1114 Dullemond, C. P., van Zadelhoff, G. J., & Natta, A. 2002, Pi´etu, V., Dutrey, A., & Guilloteau, S. 2007, A&A, 467, 163 Pi´etu, V., Dutrey, A., Guilloteau, S., Chapillon, E., & Pety, J. 2006, A&A, 460, L43 Pinilla, P., Benisty, M., & Birnstiel, T. 2012, A&A, 545, A81 Pinte, C., Dent, W. R. F., Menard, F., et al. 2016, ApJ, A&A, 389, 464 816, 25 Dullemond, C. 2012, Astrophysics Source Code Library Dutrey, A., Wakelam, V., Boehler, Y., et al. 2011, A&A, Pollack, J. B., Hollenbach, D., Beckwith, S., et al. 1994, ApJ, 421, 615 535, A104 Punzi, K. M., Hily-Blant, P., Kastner, J. H., Sacco, G. G., Espaillat, C., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., et al. 2007, ApJL, & Forveille, T. 2015, ApJ, 805, 147 670, L135 Qi, C., Kessler, J. E., Koerner, D. W., et al. 2003, ApJ, Fedele, D., Carney, M., Hogerheijde, M. R., et al. 2017, 597, 986 A&A, 600, A72 France, K., Herczeg, G. J., McJunkin, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, Qi, C., D'Alessio, P., Oberg, K. I., et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, 84 Rodmann, J., Henning, T., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2006, 794, 160 A&A, 446, 211 Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., & D'Alessio, P. Rosenfeld, K. A., Andrews, S. M., Hughes, A. M., Wilner, 1998, ApJ, 495, 385 D. J., & Qi, C. 2013, ApJ, 774, 16 Henning, T., Semenov, D., Guilloteau, S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1511 Huang, J., Oberg, K. I., Qi, C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 231 Huang, P., Isella, A., Li, H., Li, S., & Ji, J. 2018, ApJ, 867, 3 Huang, P., Dong, R., Li, H., Li, S., & Ji, J. 2019, in prep Jin, S., Li, S., Isella, A., Li, H., & Ji, J. 2016, ApJ, 818, 76 Isella, A., Carpenter, J. M., & Sargent, A. I. 2009, ApJ, 701, 260 Isella, A., P´erez, L. M., & Carpenter, J. M. 2012, ApJ, 747, Ricci, L., Testi, L., Natta, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 512, A15 Ricci, L., Testi, L., Natta, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, A66 Ricci, L., Mann, R. K., Testi, L., et al. 2011, A&A, 525, A81 Ricci, L., Liu, S.-F., Isella, A., & Li, H. 2018, ApJ, 853, 110 Sallum, S., Follette, K. B., Eisner, J. A., et al. 2015, Nature, 527, 342 Simon, M., Dutrey, A., & Guilloteau, S. 2000, ApJ, 545, 1034 Skinner, S. L., & Gudel, M. 2013, ApJ, 765, 3 Thalmann, C., Grady, C. A., Goto, M., et al. 2010, ApJL, 136 718, L87 Isella, A., Chandler, C. J., Carpenter, J. M., P´erez, L. M., Thalmann, C., Janson, M., Garufi, A., et al. 2016, ApJL, & Ricci, L. 2014, ApJ, 788, 129 828, L17 Isella, A., Guidi, G., Testi, L., et al. 2016, Physical Review Thalmann, C., Mulders, G. D., Hodapp, K., et al. 2014, Letters, 117, 251101 A&A, 566, A51 Isella, A., Huang, J., Andrews, S. M., et al. 2018, ApJL, Thalmann, C., Mulders, G. D., Janson, M., et al. 2015, 869, L49 ApJL, 808, L41 Kenyon, S. J., & Hartmann, L. 1995, ApJS, 101, 117 Lacy, J. H., Knacke, R., Geballe, T. R., & Tokunaga, A. T. Thi, W.-F., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, A&A, 425, 955 1994, ApJL, 428, L69 Ubach, C., Maddison, S. T., Wright, C. M., et al. 2012, Liu, Y., Dipierro, G., Ragusa, E., et al. 2018, A&A, 622 A75 Liu, S.-F., Jin, S., Li, S., Isella, A., & Li, H. 2018, ApJ, 857, 87 MNRAS, 425, 3137 van den Ancker, M. E., de Winter, D., & Tjin A Djie, H. R. E. 1998, A&A, 330, 145 10 Jin et al. van der Marel, N., van Dishoeck, E. F., Bruderer, S., P´erez, Zhu, Z., Nelson, R. P., Hartmann, L., Espaillat, C., & L., & Isella, A. 2015, A&A, 579, A106 Calvet, N. 2011, ApJ, 729, 47 Visser, R., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Black, J. H. 2009, A&A, Zubko, V. G., Mennella, V., Colangeli, L., & Bussoletti, E. 503, 323 Weingartner, J. C., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 548, 296 1996, MNRAS, 282, 1321 LkCa 15 manuscript 11 Parameter Mdisk (M(cid:12)) γ RCarctan γarctan Table 1. Four-dimensional parameter grids [1.0e-4, 3.3e-4, 1.0e-3, 3.3e-3, 1.0e-2, 3.3e-2, 1.0e-1, 3.3e-1] Grids [0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0] [1, 5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65] [2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16] Figure 1. ALMA observations of the dust continuum, zero-moment 12CO, 13CO and C18O maps of the LkCa 15 system. Top left: the dust continuum map. Top right: the zero-moment 12CO map. Bottom left: the zero-moment 13CO map. Bottom right: the zero-moment C18O map. 12 Jin et al. Figure 2. The observed channel maps of 12CO, 13CO and C18O of the LkCa 15 system. LkCa 15 manuscript 13 Figure 3. Gas surface density profile of the best-fit run (top panel) and the surface density profile of mm-size dust used in all the 4096 runs (bottom panel). Figure 4. The vertical disk temperature structure of the best-fit model as calculated by our iterative approach. 10-210-1100101102Σ [ g/cm2 ]Gas10-510-410-310-210-1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600Σ [ g/cm2 ]r [ AU ]Dust14 Jin et al. Figure 5. Comparison of the azimuthal averaged radial intensity profiles that are extracted from the zero-moment maps of 12CO, 13CO and the dust continuum map. The error-bars show the ALMA observation, and the solid green lines show our our best-fit model. The brown and blue lines show the intensity profiles of the high-mass and low-mass model in the parameter study at 5.2. 100101102103I (mJy/beam • km/s)ALMA 12COBest-fit modelLow-mass ModelHigh-mass Model100101102I (mJy/beam • km/s)ALMA 13COManually fit 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 100 200 300 400 500 600I (mJy/beam)r [ AU ]ALMA ContinuumBest-fit modelLkCa 15 manuscript 15 Figure 6. The dust continuum and zero-moment 12CO of our best-fit model and the zero-moment map of the fitted 13CO. Left: the dust continuum map. Middle: zero-moment 12CO map. Right: zero-moment 13CO map. Figure 7. The channel maps of 12CO of the best-fit model and the channel maps of the fitted 13CO. 16 Jin et al. Figure 8. Heat maps of the reduced χ2 of 12CO in different combinations of parameters. LkCa 15 manuscript 17 Figure 9. The 12CO channel maps of the low-mass, best-fit, high-mass model and the ALMA observation.
1604.04116	1	1604	2016-04-14T11:37:27	Population synthesis of planet formation using a torque formula with dynamic effects	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Population synthesis studies into planet formation have suggested that distributions consistent with observations can only be reproduced if the actual Type I migration timescale is at least an order of magnitude longer than that deduced from linear theories. Although past studies considered the effect of the Type I migration of protoplanetary embryos, in most cases they used a conventional formula based on static torques in isothermal disks, and employed a reduction factor to account for uncertainty in the mechanism details. However, in addition to static torques, a migrating planet experiences dynamic torques that are proportional to the migration rate. These dynamic torques can impact on planet migration and predicted planetary populations. In this study, we derived a new torque formula for Type I migration by taking into account dynamic corrections. This formula was used to perform population synthesis simulations with and without the effect of dynamic torques. In many cases, inward migration was slowed significantly by the dynamic effects. For the static torque case, gas giant formation was effectively suppressed by Type I migration; however, when dynamic effects were considered, a substantial fraction of cores survived and grew into gas giants.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Population synthesis of planet formation using a torque formula with dynamic effects Takanori Sasaki1 and Toshikazu Ebisuzaki2 1Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan 2RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan [email protected] Received ; accepted 6 1 0 2 r p A 4 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 6 1 1 4 0 . 4 0 6 1 : v i X r a -- 2 -- ABSTRACT Population synthesis studies into planet formation have suggested that distri- butions consistent with observations can only be reproduced if the actual Type I migration timescale is at least an order of magnitude longer than that deduced from linear theories. Although past studies considered the effect of the Type I migration of protoplanetary embryos, in most cases they used a conventional formula based on static torques in isothermal disks, and employed a reduction factor to account for uncertainty in the mechanism details. However, in addition to static torques, a migrating planet experiences dynamic torques that are pro- portional to the migration rate. These dynamic torques can impact on planet migration and predicted planetary populations. In this study, we derived a new torque formula for Type I migration by taking into account dynamic corrections. This formula was used to perform population synthesis simulations with and without the effect of dynamic torques. In many cases, inward migration was slowed significantly by the dynamic effects. For the static torque case, gas giant formation was effectively suppressed by Type I migration; however, when dy- namic effects were considered, a substantial fraction of cores survived and grew into gas giants. Keywords: Planetary formation -- Population synthesis -- Type I migration -- 3 -- 1. Introduction The population of extrasolar planets (Baruteau and Papaloizou 2013), and perhaps even the solar system (Walsh et al. 2011), provide strong evidence that migration has played a role in shaping planetary systems. Low-mass planets (i.e., those with masses up to that of Neptune) migrate through the excitation of linear density waves in the disk, and through a contribution from the corotation region (i.e., Type I migration). Early analytical work (Tanaka et al. 2002) focused on isothermal disks, in which the temperature was prescribed and fixed. These studies found that migration was always directed inward for reasonable disk parameters, and that migration time scales were much shorter than the disk life time; therefore, according to migration theory, all the planets should end up very close to the central star. While Type I migration has always been linked to linear interactions with the disk, Paardekooper and Papaloizou (2009) showed that corotation torque (or horseshoe drag) in isothermal disks show nonlinear behavior and can be much larger than previous linear estimates, which works against fast inward migration. However,the corotation tends to be prone to saturation and fail to prevent rapid inward migration for most of the cases, since in the absence of a diffusive process, the corotation region is a closed system; therefore, it can only provide a finite amount of angular momentum to a planet. Several well-established theoretical models of planet formation based on the core accretion scenario adopted a population synthesis approach (e.g., Ida and Lin 2004, 2008; Ida et al. 2013; Mordasini et al. 2009a,b). Ida and Lin (2004) focused on the influence of Type I migration on planetary formation processes and found that when the effects of Type I migration are taken into account, planetary cores have a tendency to migrate into their host stars before they acquire adequate mass to initiate efficient gas accretion. In order to preserve a sufficient fraction of gas giants around solar-type stars, they introduced a Type I -- 4 -- migration reduction factor, where factor magnitudes of smaller than unity work to lengthen the Type I migration timescale relative to those deduced from linear theories. With a range of small factors (∼ 0.01), it was possible to produce a planetary Mp-a distribution that was qualitatively consistent with observations from a radial velocity survey. While several suppression mechanisms for Type I migration under various circumstances have been suggested (e.g., Paardekooper et al. 2011), the origin of the extremely small reduction factor values remains unknown. Recently, it was proposed that dynamic corotation torque can also play a role for low-mass planets, especially where static corotation torques saturate. Paardekooper (2014) presented an analysis of the torques on migrating, low-mass planets in locally isothermal disks. They found that planets experience dynamic torques whenever there is a radial gradient in vortensity in addition to static torques, which do not depend on the migration rate. These dynamic torques are proportional to the migration rate and can have either a positive or a negative feedback on migration, depending on whether the planet is migrating with or against the static corotation torque. Moreover, they showed that in disks a few times more massive than the minimum mass solar nebula (MMSN), the effects of dynamic torques are significant to reduce inward migration. In this study, we deduced a torque formula for Type I migration by taking into account dynamic corrections. Using this formula, we performed population synthesis simulations with and without the dynamic corrections in order to evaluate the migration velocity quantitatively. We found that the effective torques with dynamic correction were much smaller than the simple static torques when applied to disks of the MMSN model. We used dynamic torques based on the theory of Paardekooper (2014) and estimated actual Type I migration, and then simulated various sets of planetary systems based on the observed range of disk properties. Finally, we compared the simulated results with observational data. -- 5 -- 2. Dynamic Correction of Type I Migration Formula According to Paardekooper et al. (2011; hereafter Pa11) and Colman & Nelson (2014; hereafter CN14), new static torque formula for Type I migration can be derived (see Appendix). When developing the dynamic correction formula, we considered the work of Paardekooper (2014), who showed that Γdynamic, the term proportional to drp/dt, must be included in the torque formula, or in other words: which is given by (Pa14 eq18): Γ = Γstatic + Γdynamic, Γdynamic = 2π(1 − wc/w(rp))Σr2 pxsΩvp, (1) (2) where Σ is the surface density of the disk, rp is the semimajor axis of the protoplanet, xs is the thickness of the horseshoe region, Ω = (GM∗/r3 p)1/2 (G is the gravitational constant, and M∗ is the stellar mass), and vp = drp/dt is the radial velocity of the protoplanet. Here, 1 − wc/w(rp) was calculated by (Pa14 eq28, modified by TE): x2 s 6rpν 1 − wc/w(rp) = (3/2 + p) min(cid:18)1, vp(cid:19) , (3) where p = d ln Σ/d ln r and ν is the viscosity of the disk. Assuming a circular orbit of the protoplanet, vp can be calculated by the equation: τlib dvp dt = −vp + 2qd πqr3 pΩΣ (Γstatic + Γdynamic), (4) where τlib = 4πrp/(3Ωxs) is the liberation timescale of gas in the disk, q = Mp/M∗, and qd = πr2 pΣ/M∗. For the case of slow migration (i.e., τlib ≪ 4πrp/(3Ωxs) ≪ rp/vp), we were able to assume a steady state for equation 4 to determine vp, or in other words: − vp + 2qd πqr3 pΩΣ (Γstatic + Γdynamic) = 0. (5) -- 6 -- 2.1. Inviscid case: x2 6rpν vp > 1 s We derived vp by substituting equations 2 and 3 into equation 4 as: Γinviscid = 1 1 − (3/2 + p)mc Γstatic, where, mc is given by (Pa14 eq20): mc = 4qd ¯xs/q, where ¯xs = xs/rp. (6) (7) 2.2. Viscid case: x2 6rpν vp < 1 s We derived a quadratic equation of vp by substituting equations 2 and 3 into equation 4 as: where A = Av2 p + Bvp + C = 0, 2qd ¯x3 s rp 3qν (cid:18) 3 2 + p(cid:19) τν 6rp (8) (9) (10) (11) + p(cid:19) = mc(cid:18)3 2 B = −1 2qdq πh2 rpΩγstatic = C = rp τmig γstatic, where h is the scale height of the disk, γstatic = Γstatic/Γ0 (Γ0 = (q/h)2Σr4Ω2), and τν and τmig are the timescales of diffusion and migration, respectively, as given by (Pa14 eq10 and 23): τν = τmig = r2 p ¯x2 s ν πh2 2qdqΩ (12) (13) -- 7 -- The quadratic formula gives the total torque after dynamic correction: Γviscid = Θ(k)Γstatic, where the function Θ(k) is defined by (Pa14 eq30): Θ(k) = 1 − √1 − 2k k , where k is the coefficients given by (Pa14 eq31-32): k = 8 3π(cid:18)3 2 d ¯x3 s + p(cid:19) γstaticq2 h2 rpΩ ν =(cid:18) 3 2 + p(cid:19) mcτνγstatic 6τmig . (14) (15) (16) The function Θ(k) takes a critical value of 2 at k = 1/2, but for k > 1/2 it does not take any value, since the inside of the square root of Θ(k) becomes negative. This suggests that runaway migration takes place for the case k > 1/2. Paardekooper (2014) suggested that the time scale of migration for runaway case would be mcτmig, and in such a case, torque for the runaway migration would be: Γrw = q 4qd Γ0 (17) The results are consistent with the numerical results of Paardekooper et al. (2011). In their simulation, vp rapidly converged to the values obtained here, after a short transient phase (Figs. 7, 8, and 9 in Paardekooper (2014)). In summary, our new torque formula of Type I migration, taking into account dynamic effects, is given as: ΓI = Γstatic min(cid:18) 1 1 − mc(2/3 − α) = q 4qd Γ0 k > 0.5 , Θ(k)(cid:19) k < 0.5 (18) (19) Figure 1 shows the dynamic correction factor at each semimajor axis for embryos with masses of 0.01 M⊕, 0.1 M⊕, 1.0 M⊕, and 10 M⊕. The masses of the disks were -- 8 -- Fig. 1. -- Dynamic correction factor at each semimajor axis for 0.01 M⊕ (M⊕ = ME), 0.1 M⊕, 1.0 M⊕, and 10 M⊕ from top to bottom in each panel. The mass of the disks are (a) 1/√10×MMSN, (b) 1.0×MMSN, (c) √10×MMSN, and (d) 10×MMSN. -- 9 -- (a) 1/√10×MMSN, (b) 1.0×MMSN, (c) √10×MMSN, and (d) 10×MMSN. Except for a close-in small protoplanet, most protoplanets had correction factors of significantly less than 0.1; therefore, Type I migration was generally significantly slowed by dynamic effects. 3. Planet Formation and Migration Model In our model, we adopted the models of Ida and Lin (2004, 2008) and Ida et al. (2013) for (1) planetesimals' growth through cohesive collisions, (2) the evolution of planetesimal surface density, (3) embryos' Type I migration and their stoppage at the disk inner edge (except for a modification of the Type I migration formula to include dynamic correction; see Section 2), and for the gas giants, (4) the onset, rate, and termination (through gap opening and/or global depletion) of efficient gas accretion, and (5) their Type II migration. 3.1. Disk models We adopted the MMSN model (Hayashi 1981) as a fiducial set of initial conditions for planetesimal surface density (Σd) and introduced a multiplicative factor (fd). For the gas surface density (Σg), we adopted the r-dependence of steady accretion disk with constant viscosity (Σg ∝ r−1) scaled by that of the MMSN at 10 AU with a scaling factor (fg). Following Ida and Lin (2008), we set: Σd = Σd,10ηicefd(r/10AU)−1.5, Σg = Σg,10fg(r/10AU)−1.0, (20)   where normalization factors Σd,10 = 0.32 g cm−2 and Σg,10 = 75 g cm−2, and the step function was ηice = 1 inside the ice line at aice and 4.2 for r > aice. Neglecting the detailed energy balance in the disk (Chiang and Goldreich 1997), we adopted the equilibrium temperature distribution of optically thin disks given by Hayashi -- 10 -- (1981), such that: T = 280(cid:16) r 1AU(cid:17)−1/2(cid:18) L∗ L⊙(cid:19)1/4 K, (21) where L∗ and L⊙ are stellar and solar luminosity. We set the ice line to be that determined by an equilibrium temperature in optically thin disk regions: aice = 2.7(cid:18) L∗ L⊙(cid:19)1/2 AU. Owing to viscous diffusion and photoevaporation, fg decreases with time. For simplicity, we adopted: where fg,0 is the initial value of fg and τdep is the gas depletion timescale. fg = fg,0 exp(cid:18)− t τdep(cid:19) , (22) (23) 3.2. From oligarchic growth to isolation On the basis of the oligarchic growth model (Kokubo and Ida 1998, 2002), the growth rate of embryos/cores at any location, a, and time t, in the presence of disk gas, was described by: where dMc dt = Mc τc,acc (24) yr, (25) τc,acc = 3.5 × 105η−1 ice f −1 d f −2/5 g 1AU(cid:17)5/2(cid:18) Mc (cid:16) a M⊕(cid:19)1/3(cid:18) M∗ M⊙(cid:19)−1/6 where Mc is the mass of the embryo/core. Furthermore, we set the mass of typical field planetesimals to be m = 1020 g. We computed the evolution of Σd distribution due to accretion by all emerging embryos in a self-consistent manner. The growth and migration of many planets were integrated simultaneously with the evolution of the Σd-distribution. -- 11 -- During the early phase of evolution, embryos are embedded in their natal disks. Despite their mutual gravitational perturbation, embryos preserve their circular orbits owing to gravitational drag from disk gas (Ward 1993) and dynamic friction from residual planetesimals (Stewart and Ida 2000). After the disk gas is severely depleted, the efficiency of the eccentricity damping mechanism is reduced, and the embryos' eccentricity grow until they cross each other's orbits (i.e., giant impact). However, in this study, growth via the giant impact process was not considered. Moreover, we also ignored dynamic interaction between planets, with the growth of individual planets integrated independently. 3.3. Type I migration Type I migration of an embryo is caused by the sum of tidal torque from disk regions that are both interior and exterior to the embryos. The rate and direction of embryos' migration are determined by the differential Lindblad and corotation torques. While a conventional formula of Type I migration, which assumes locally isothermal disks (Tanaka et al. 2002), shows that the migration is always inward, recent developments have shown Type I migration of isolated embryos in non-isothermal disks; therefore, the magnitude and sign of tidal torque can be changed. Ida and Lin (2008) used the conventional formula of Type I migration in isothermal disks derived by Tanaka et al. (2002) with a scaling factor C1 of: dr dt ≃ C1 × 1.08(p + 0.80q − 2.52) Mp M∗ Σgr2 cs (cid:19)2 M∗ (cid:18)rΩK rΩK, (26) where p = d log Σg/d log r, q = d log T /d log r, cs is the sound speed, and ΩK is the Keplerian angular velocity. The expression of Tanaka et al. (2002) corresponds to C1 = 1, and for slower migration, C1 < 1. While we derived a new torque formula for Type I migration that included dynamic corrections (see Section 2), for comparison we also used the conventional formula with the scaling factor C1 = 1.0. -- 12 -- We assumed that Type I migration ceases inside the inner boundary of the disk, because at this point fg is locally zero. For computational convenience, we set the disk inner boundary to be the edge of the magnetospheric cavity at 0.04 AU. 3.4. Formation of gas giant planets Models for the formation of gas giant planets were the same as those used in Ida et al. (2013). Embryos were surrounded by gaseous envelopes when their surface escape velocities became larger than the sound speed of the surrounding disk gas. When their mass grew (through planetesimal bombardment) above a critical mass: Mc,hydro ≃ 10 Mc 10−6M⊕yr−1!0.25 M⊕, (27) both the radiative and convective transport of heat became sufficiently efficient to allow their envelope to contract dynamically (Ikoma et al. 2000). In the above equation, we neglected the dependence on opacity in the envelope (Hori and Ikoma 2010). In regions where cores have already acquired isolation mass, their planetesimal-accretion rate ( Mc) would be much diminished (Ikoma et al. 2000) and Mc,hydro would be comparable to an Earth-mass, M⊕. However, gas accretion also releases energy and its rate is still regulated by the efficiency of radiative transfer in the envelope, such that: dMp dt ≃ Mp τKH , (28) where Mp is the planet mass including gas envelope. According to Ida and Lin (2008), we approximated the Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction timescale, τKH, of the envelope using: τKH ≃ 109(cid:18) Mp M⊕(cid:19)−3 , (29) Equation 28 shows that dMp/dt rapidly increases as Mp grows; however, this is limited -- 13 -- by the global gas accretion rate throughout the disk and by the process of gap formation near the protoplanets' orbits. The disk accretion rate can be expressed as: Mdisk ≃ 3 × 10−9fg(cid:16) α 10−3(cid:17) M⊙yr−1, (30) where α is a parameter of alpha prescription for turbulent viscosity (Shakura and Sunyaev 1973). During the advanced stage of disk evolution, we assumed that both Mdisk and Σg evolved in proportion to exp(−t/τdep). The rate of accretion onto the cores cannot exceed Mdisk. A gap, or at least a partial gap, is formed when a planet's tidal torque exceeds the disk's intrinsic viscous stress (Lin and Papaloizou 1985). This viscous condition for gap formation is satisfied for planets with: Mp > Mg,vis ≃ 30(cid:16) α 10−3(cid:17)(cid:16) a 1AU(cid:17)1/2(cid:18) L∗ L⊙(cid:19)1/4 M⊕. (31) In this case, Type I migration transitions to Type II migration. Fluid dynamic simulations (D'Angelo and Kley 2003; D'Angelo and Lubow 2008) show that some fraction of gas still flows into the gap. Following the results of Dobbs-Dixon et al. (2007), we completely terminated gas accretion when a planet's Hill radius became larger than two times the disk scale height, which corresponded to the thermal condition of (Lin and Papaloizou 1985), that is: Mp > Mg,th ≃ 0.95 × 103(cid:16) a 1AU(cid:17)3/4(cid:18) L∗ L⊙(cid:19)3/8(cid:18) M∗ M⊙(cid:19)−1/2 M⊕. (32) In general, our models for gas accretion rates onto the cores were: dMp dt = fgap Mp,nogap, (33) when in the absence of any feedback on the disk structure. Therefore, without the effect of gap opening: Mp,nogap = min(cid:18) Mp τKH , Mdisk(cid:19) , (34) -- 14 -- and fgap is a reduction factor due to gap opening: 1 [for Mp < Mg,vis] log Mp − log Mg,vis log Mg,th − log Mg,vis 0 [for Mg,vis < Mp < Mg,th], (35) [for Mp > Mg,th]. fgap =   3.5. Type II migration During gap formation, embedded gas giants adjust their positions in the gap to establish a quasi equilibrium between the torque applied on them from disk regions both interior and exterior to their orbits. Subsequently, as the disk gas undergoes viscous diffusion, this interaction leads to Type II migration. We assumed that planets undergo Type II migration after they have accreted a sufficient mass to satisfy the viscous condition (Mg,vis < Mp) for gap formation. While Mp increases, the disk mass declines owing to stellar and planetary accretion and photoevaporation. While disk mass exceeds Mp (during the disk-dominated regime), planets' Type II migration is locked, with the viscous diffusion of the disk gas. During the advanced stages of disk evolution, when the mass becomes smaller than Mp (during the planet-dominated regime), embedded planets carry a major share of the total angular momentum content. For the disk-dominated regime, the migration timescale is given by: τmig2,disk ≃ 0.7 × 105(cid:16) α 10−3(cid:17)−1(cid:16) a 1AU(cid:17)(cid:18) M∗ M⊙(cid:19)−1/2 yr. (36) For the planet-dominated regime, the migration timescale is given by: τmig2,pl ≃ 5 × 105f −1 g (cid:18) C2α 10−4(cid:19)−1(cid:18) Mp MJ(cid:19)(cid:16) a 1AU(cid:17)1/2(cid:18) M∗ M⊙(cid:19)−1/2 yr, (37) -- 15 -- where C2 is an efficiency factor associated with the degree of asymmetry in the torques between the inner and outer disk regions. If the inner disk is severely depleted, C2 = 1. We treated the factor C2 as a model parameter, and we set C2 = 0.1. 4. Population Synthesis of Planetary Systems Using our new torque formula for Type I migration, we modeled the formation of planetary systems using Monte Carlo simulations. The predicted mass and period distributions were compared with those from a conventional Type I migration model. 4.1. Numerical settings We first generated a set of 1000 disks with various values of fg,0 (the initial value of fg) and τdep. We adopted a range of disk model parameters that represented the observed distribution of disk properties and assigned them to each model with an appropriate statistical weight. For the gaseous component, we assumed that fg,0 had a lognormal distribution centered on fg,0 = 1 with a dispersion of 1 and an upper cutoff at fg,0 = 30, independent of the stellar metallicity. For heavy elements, we choose fd,0 = 10[Fe/H]dfg,0, where [Fe/H]d is the metallicity of the disk. We assumed that these disks had the same metallicities as their host stars. We also assumed that τdep had log-uniform distributions in the range 106 − −107 yr. For each disk, 15 values of a for the protoplanetary seeds were selected from a long-uniform distribution in the range 0.05 -- 30 AU, assuming that the mean orbital separation between planets was 0.2 on a logarithmic scale. Constant spacing in the logarithm corresponded to the spacings between the cores, which were proportional to a. This represented the simplest choice and a natural outcome of dynamic isolation at the end -- 16 -- of oligarchic growth. In all simulations, the values α = 10−3 and M∗ = 1M⊙ were assumed. Since ongoing radial velocity surveys are focused on relatively metal-rich stars, we presented our results with [Fe/H] = 0.1. We artificially terminated Type I and Type II migration near the disk inner edge at 0.04 AU. We did not specify a survival criterion for the close-in planets because we lacked adequate knowledge about planets' migration and their interaction with host stars near the inner edge of their nascent disks. Hence, we recorded all of the planets that migrated to the vicinity of their host stars. In reality, a large fraction of the giant planets that have migrated to small disk radii were either consumed (Sandquist et al. 1998) or tidally disrupted (Trilling et al. 1998) by their host stars. Cores that migrate to the inner edge of the disk may also coagulated and form super-Earths (Ogihara and Ida 2009); however, this was not considered in our simulations. 4.2. Simulated individual systems We compared the time evolution of planetary masses and semimajor axes for the new torque formula model (Fig. 2a; Fig. 3a) and the conventional torque formula model with C1 = 1.0 (Fig. 2b; Fig. 3b). We choose a disk a few times more massive (fg,0 = 6.0 and 8.0) than the minimum solar nebula, and with τdep = 3 × 106 yr. The results showed that inward migration of planet embryos was slowed significantly by dynamic effects. When dynamic effects were considered, some cores survived and grew into gas giants; however, when considering only static torque, all cores migrated to the vicinity of their central star before growing enough to accrete the nebula gas. -- 17 -- Fig. 2. -- Growth and migration of planets for scaling factor fg,0 = 3.0. Units of mass (Mp) and semimajor axis (a) are Earth masses (M⊕ = ME) and AU. (a) Mass evolutions obtained from simulations with the new torque formula for Type I migration. (b) Evolutions using the conventional formula (C1 = 1.0). Fig. 3. -- Growth and migration of planets for scaling factor fg,0 = 8.0. Units of mass (Mp) and semimajor axis (a) are Earth masses (M⊕ = ME) and AU. (a) Mass evolutions obtained from simulations with the new torque formula for Type I migration. (b) Evolutions using the conventional formula (C1 = 1.0). -- 18 -- Fig. 4. -- Evolution of the dynamic correction factor for a scaling factor of (a) fg,0 = 3.0, and (b) fg,0 = 8.0. Units of mass (Mp) are Earth masses (M⊕ = ME). Figure 4 shows the evolution of the dynamic correction factor (see equation 18), ΓI/Γstatic = min(cid:18) 1 1 − mc(3/2 + p) , Θ(k)(cid:19) , (38) with the mass of each planet embryo. The correction factors remained small (≤ 0.1) throughout the simulation; therefore, the dynamic correction of Type I migration effectively prevented embryos from migrating to the central star. 4.3. Distributions of mass and semimajor axes We compared the predicted Mp-a distributions using the new torque formula (Fig. 5a) and the conventional formula with C1 = 1.0 at t = 2 × 107 yr. In order to directly compare the theoretical predictions with the observed data, we plotted values of Mp that were 1.27 times the values of Mp sin i, as determined from radial velocity measurements (Fig. 5c). This correction factor corresponded to mean values of 1/hsin ii = 4/π for a sample of planetary systems with randomly oriented orbital plants. To compare the theoretical results -- 19 -- with M∗ = 1M⊙, we plotted only the data of planets around stars with M∗ = 0.8 − 1.2M⊙ that have been observed by radial velocity surveys 1. For the conventional models, the formation probability of gas giants dramatically changed with C1 (Ida and Lin 2008). Within the limits of Type I migration with an efficiency comparable to that deduced from the traditional linear torque analysis (i.e., with C1 = 1; Fig. 5b), all cores were cleared prior to gas depletion, such that gas giant formation was effectively suppressed. However, when considering the dynamic effects, a substantial fraction of the cores survived and grew into large gas giants (Fig. 5a). We carry out a Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test for statistical similarity between the predicted Mp-a distributions and the observed data for the parameter domain of 0.1 AU < a < 5 AU and Mp > 100M. While the conventional model produces no giant planets (Fig. 5b), the predicted Mp-a distribution using the new torque formula (Fig. 5a) is statistically similar to the observed data (Fig. 5c) within a significance level of p-value > 0.05 for both the semimajor axis and mass cumulative distribution functions. Without considering the dynamic correction for Type I migration, when a planet's mass exceeded that of Earth, the corotation torque became smaller owing to saturation. At this point, static torque affected the planet more efficiently so that its inward migration was rapid. However, when the dynamic correction was included, the migration timescale was short, and the saturation of the corotation torque was less effective. Under these conditions, inward migration slowed, which allowed for the formation of gas giants before migration to the central star. In summary, population synthesis simulations using our new torque formula with dynamic correction (Fig. 5a) can explain the gas giants (> 100M⊕) observed in exoplanetary 1See http://exoplanet.eu/. -- 20 -- systems (Fig. 5c). In contrast, simulations using a conventional formula (C1 = 1.0; Fig. 5b) cannot explain the observed data. These results show that planet populations consistent with observations can be reproduced naturally (i.e., without considering the reduction factor) if we take into account dynamic corrections for Type I migration torque. 5. Conclusions We derived a new torque formula for Type I migration by taking into account dynamic corrections. Using this formula, we performed population synthesis simulations with and without the effects of dynamic torques. In most cases, inward migration was significantly slowed by the dynamic effects. Considering just static torques, gas giant formation was effectively suppressed by Type I migration of cores; however, when dynamic effects were considered, a substantial fraction of cores survived and grew into gas giants. Acknowledgments We thank an anonymous reviewer for the helpful comments. This research was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT; Grant Number 26106006). T.S. was supported by a Grand-in-Aid for Young Scientists (KAKENHI B) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS; Grant Number 24740120). -- 21 -- Fig. 5. -- Planetary mass and semimajor axis distribution. Units of mass (Mp) and semimajor axis (a) are Earth masses (M⊕ = ME) and AU. (a) Distribution obtained from Monte Carlo simulations with the new torque formula for Type I migration. (b) Distributions using the conventional formula (C1 = 1.0). (c) Observational data of extrasolar planets around stars with M∗ = 0.8−1.2M⊙ detected by radial velocity surveys. The determined value of Mp sin i is multiplied by 1/hsin ii = 4/π ≃ 1.27, where a random orientation of the planetary orbital planes is assumed. -- 22 -- REFERENCES Baruteau, C., Papaloizou, J.C.B., 2013. Disk-planets interactions and the diversity of period ratios in Kepler's multi-planetary systems. Astrophysical Journal 778, 7 (15 pp). Chiang, E.I., Goldreich, P., 1997. Spectral energy distributions of T Tauri stars with passive circumstellar disks. Astrophysical Journal 490, 368 -- 376. Coleman, G.A.L., Nelson, R.P., 2015. On the formation of planetary systems via oligarchic growth in thermally evolving viscous discs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 445, 479 -- 499. Cresswell, P., Nelson, R.P., 2008. Three-dimensional simulations of multiple protoplanets embedded in a protostellar disc. Astronomy & Astrophysics 482, 677 -- 690. D'Angelo, G., Kley, W., 2003. Orbital migration and mass accretion of protoplanets in three-dimensional global computations with nested grids. Astrophysical Journal 586, 540 -- 561. D'Angelo, G., Lubow, S.H., 2008. Evolution of migrating planets undergoing gas accretion. Astrophysical Journal 685, 560 -- 583. Dobbs-Dixon, I., Li, S.L., Lin, D.N.C., 2007. Tidal barrier and the asymptotic mass of proto gas-giant planets. Astrophysical Journal 660, 791 -- 806. Hayaschi, C., 1981. Structure of the solar nebula. Growth and decay of magnetic fields, and effect of magnetic and turbulent viscosities on the nebula. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 70, 35 -- 53. Hori, Y., Ikoma, M., 2010. Critical core masses for gas giant formation with grain-free envelopes. Astrophysical Journal 714, 1343 -- 1346. -- 23 -- Ida, S., Lin, D.N.C., 2004. Toward a deterministic model of planetary formation. I. A desert in the mass and semimajor axis distributions of extrasolar planets. Astrophysical Journal 604, 388 -- 413. Ida, S., Lin, D.N.C., 2008. Toward a deterministic model of planetary formation. IV. Effects of type I migration. Astrophysical Journal 673, 487 -- 501. Ida, S., Lin, D.N.C., Nagasawa, M., 2013. Toward a deterministic model of planetary formation. VII. Eccentricity distribution of gas giants. Astrophysical Journal 775, 42 (25 pp). Ikoma, M., Nakazawa, K., Emori, H., 2000. Formation of giant planets: Dependences on core accretion rate and grain opacity. Astrophysical Journal 537, 1013 -- 1025. Kokubo, E., Ida, S., 1998. Oligarchic growth of protoplanets. Icarus 131, 171 -- 178. Kokubo, E., Ida, S., 2002. Formation of protoplanet systems and diversity of planetary systems. Astrophysical Journal 581, 666 -- 680. Lin, D.N.C., Papaloizou, J.C.B., 1985. On the dynamical origin of the solar system. In: Black, D.C., Matthew, M.S. (Eds.), Protostars and Planets II. Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 981 -- 1072. Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Benz, W., 2009. Extrasolar planet population syntehsis. I. Method, formation tracks, and mass-distance distribution. Astronomy & Astrophysics 501, 1139 -- 1160. Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Benz, W., Naef, D., 2009. Extrasolar planet population syntehsis. II. Statistical comparison with observations. Astronomy & Astrophysics 501, 1161 -- 1184. -- 24 -- Ogihara, M., Ida, S., 2009. N-body simulations of planetary accretion around M dwarf stars. Astrophysical Journal 699, 824 -- 838. Paardekooper, S.-J., Papaloizou, J.C.B., 2009. On corotation torques, horseshoe drag and the possibility of sustained stalled or outward protoplanetary migration. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 394, 2283 -- 2296. Paardekooper, S.-J., Baruteau, C., Kley, W., 2011. A torque formula for non-isothermal type I planetary migration - II. Unsaturated horseshoe drag. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 410, 293 -- 303. Paardeokooper, S.-J., 2014. Dynamical corotation torque on low-mass planets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 444, 2031 -- 2042. Sandquist, E., Taam, R.E., Lin, D.N.C., Burkert, A., 1998. Planet consumption and stellar metallicity enhancements. Astrophysical Journal 506, L65 -- L68. Shakura, N.I., Sunyaev, R.A., 1973. Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. Astronomy & Astrophysics 24, 337 -- 355. Stewart, G.R., Ida, S., 2000. Velocity evolution of planetesimals: Unifield analytical formulas and comparisons with N-body simulations. Icarus 143, 28 -- 44. Tanaka, H., Takeuchi, T., Ward, W.R., 2002. Three-dimensional interaction between a planet and an isothermal gaseous disk. I. Corotation and Lindblad torques and planet migration. Astrophysical Journal 565, 1257 -- 1274. Trilling, D.E., Benz, W., Guillot, T., Lunine, J.I., Hubbard, W.B., Burrows, A., 1998. Orbital evolution and migration of giant planets: Modeling extrasolar planets. Astrophysical Journal 500, 428 -- 439. -- 25 -- Walsh, K.J., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S.N., O'Brien, D.P., Mandel, A.M., 2011. A low mass for Mars from Jupiter?s early gas-driven migration. Nature 475, 206 -- 209. Ward, W.R., 1993. Density waves in the solar nebula: Planetesimal velocities. Icarus 106, 274 -- 287. A. Static Torque Formula Static torque (Pa11 and CN14) is given by Γstatic = FLΓLR + (cid:20)ΓVHSF (pν)G(pν) + ΓEHSF (pν)F (pχ)qG(pν)G(pχ) + ΓLVCT(1 − K(pν)) +ΓLECTq(1 − K(pν))(1 − K(pχ))(cid:21) FeFi, (A1) (A2) (A3) where ΓLR, ΓVHS, ΓEHS, ΓLVCT, and ΓLECT are the Lindblad torque, vortensity and entropy related horseshoe drag torques, and linear vortensity and entropy related corotation torques, respectively, as given by equation 3 -- 7 in Paardekooper et al. (2011): ΓLR = (−2.5 − 1.7β + 0.1α)Γ0/γeff, ΓVHS = [1.1(3/2 − α)]Γ0/γeff, ΓEHS = 7.9(ξ/γeff)Γ0/γeff, ΓLVCT = [0.7(3/2 − α)]Γ0/γeff, ΓLECT = [(2.2 − 1.4/γeff)]Γ0/γeff, (A4) (A5) (A6) (A7) (A8) where α = d ln Σ/d ln r, β = d ln Tm/d ln r, and ξ = β − (γeff − 1)α. Here, Γ0 = (q/h)2Σr4Ω2. This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. -- 26 -- The functions F (pν), F (pχ), G(pν), F (pχ), K(pν), and K(pχ) are related to the ratio between the viscous/thermal diffusion time scale and horseshoe liberation/horseshoe U-turn time scales, given by equations 23, 30, and 21 in Paardekooper et al. (2011): F (p) = 1 1 + (p/1.3)2 G(p) = 16 8 (cid:1)3/4 p3/2 25(cid:0) 45π 45π(cid:1)4/3 1 − 9 25(cid:0) 8 p−8/3 45π p <q 8 p >q 8 45π K(p) = 16 28 (cid:1)3/4 p3/2 25(cid:0) 45π 45π(cid:1)4/3 p−8/3 25(cid:0) 28 1 − 9 45π p <q 28 p >q 28 45π . The pν and pχ are given by (Pa11 eq19 and eq40): s 2 pν = 3r r2Ω¯x3 pχ = sr2Ω¯x3 2πχ 2πν , s where (Pa11 eq48-49) ¯xs = xs/r is given by and (Pa11 eq34) 1.1 γ1/4 ¯xs = Cpq/h, b/h(cid:19)−1/4 eff (cid:18) 0.4 4γ(γ − 1)σT 4 3κρ2H 2Ω2 . , C = χ = (A9) (A10) (A11) (A12) (A13) (A14) (A15) (A16) (A17) (A18) -- 27 -- The effective adiabatic index γeff is given by (Pa11 eq45-46): γeff = 2Qγ γQ + 1 2q2p(γ2Q2 + 1)2 − 16Q2(γ − 1) + 2γ2Q2 − 2 taking into account of the photon diffusion in a disk. Here, , (A19) Q = 2χ 3h3r2Ω (A20) Fe and Fi are the reduction factor due to eccentricity and inclination of the planets, which are give by (CN15 eq16-20): Fe = exp(cid:18)− e ef(cid:19) , where e is the plane's eccentricity and ef is defined as: ef = h/2 + 0.01 Fi = 1 − tanh(i/h), (A21) (A22) (A23) where i is the inclination of the planet. The factor FL is the reduction in Lindblad torques when planets are on eccentric or inclined orbits, and is given by Cresswell and Nelson (2008): FL ="Pe + where Pe is defined as Pe = Pe Pe × 0.07(cid:18) i e(cid:19)4 h(cid:19) + 0.085(cid:18) i h(cid:19)2!#−1 h(cid:17)(cid:18) i − 0.08(cid:16) e 2.25h(cid:1)1/2 +(cid:0) e 2.84h(cid:1)6 2.02h(cid:1)4 1 −(cid:0) e 1 +(cid:0) e , (A24) (A25)
1607.06686	2	1607	2016-08-05T18:10:29	The analemma criterion: accidental quasi-satellites are indeed true quasi-satellites	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	In the Solar system, a quasi-satellite is an object that follows a heliocentric path with an orbital period that matches almost exactly with that of a host body (planetary or not). The trajectory is of such nature that, without being gravitationally attached, the value of the angular separation between host and quasi-satellite as seen from the Sun remains confined within relatively narrow limits for time-spans that exceed the length of the host's sidereal orbital period. Here, we show that under these conditions, a quasi-satellite traces an analemma in the sky as observed from the host in a manner similar to that found for geosynchronous orbits. The analemmatic curve (figure-eight-, teardrop-, ellipse-shaped) results from the interplay between the tilt of the rotational axis of the host and the properties of the orbit of the quasi-satellite. The analemma criterion can be applied to identify true quasi-satellite dynamical behaviour using observational or synthetic astrometry and it is tested for several well-documented quasi-satellites. For the particular case of 15810 (1994 JR1), a putative accidental quasi-satellite of dwarf planet Pluto, we show explicitly that this object describes a complex analemmatic curve for several Plutonian sidereal periods, confirming its transient quasi-satellite status.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MNRAS 000, 1 -- 6 (2016) Preprint 13 October 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 The analemma criterion: accidental quasi-satellites are indeed true quasi-satellites C. de la Fuente Marcos⋆ and R. de la Fuente Marcos Apartado de Correos 3413, E-28080 Madrid, Spain Accepted 2016 July 22. Received 2016 July 22; in original form 2016 July 1 ABSTRACT In the Solar system, a quasi-satellite is an object that follows a heliocentric path with an orbital period that matches almost exactly with that of a host body (planetary or not). The trajectory is of such nature that, without being gravitationally attached, the value of the angular separation between host and quasi-satellite as seen from the Sun remains confined within relatively nar- row limits for time-spans that exceed the length of the host's sidereal orbital period. Here, we show that under these conditions, a quasi-satellite traces an analemma in the sky as observed from the host in a manner similar to that found for geosynchronous orbits. The analemmatic curve (figure-eight-, teardrop-, ellipse-shaped) results from the interplay between the tilt of the rotational axis of the host and the properties of the orbit of the quasi-satellite. The analemma criterion can be applied to identify true quasi-satellite dynamical behaviour using observa- tional or synthetic astrometry and it is tested for several well-documented quasi-satellites. For the particular case of 15810 (1994 JR1), a putative accidental quasi-satellite of dwarf planet Pluto, we show explicitly that this object describes a complex analemmatic curve for several Plutonian sidereal periods, confirming its transient quasi-satellite status. Key words: methods: numerical -- celestial mechanics -- minor planets, asteroids: general -- minor planets, asteroids: individual: 15810 (1994 JR1) -- minor planets, asteroids: individual: 63252 (2001 BL41). 1 INTRODUCTION Objects trapped in a 1:1 mean motion resonance with a host (plan- etary or not) are classified as co-orbitals of the host, independently of the shape and orientation of their paths (Morais & Morbidelli 2002); in other words, to be classed as co-orbitals their orbits do not have to resemble that of the host as long as the ratio of their orbital periods equates to almost exactly one. In general, co-orbital configurations are not identified observationally but as a result of the statistical analysis of large sets of numerical integrations. There is, however, a potential exception to this standard approach; a par- ticular type of co-orbital configuration that can be confirmed obser- vationally, the quasi-satellite dynamical state. Here, we study the apparent motion in host-centric equato- rial coordinates of known quasi-satellites to show that they trace an analemmatic curve in the sky as observed from the host in a manner similar to that found for geosynchronous orbits. This paper is orga- nized as follows. Section 2 discusses the so-called analemma crite- rion for quasi-satellites and it includes an extensive exploration of the known quasi-satellite population. The particular case of 15810 (1994 JR1), a putative accidental quasi-satellite of Pluto, is anal- ysed in Section 3 to show that according to the analemma criterion ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] c(cid:13) 2016 The Authors it is a true transient quasi-satellite of Pluto. Results are discussed in Section 4 and conclusions are summarized in Section 5. 2 THE ANALEMMA CRITERION Minor bodies are confirmed as co-orbitals after statistical analysis of their simulated orbital evolution. Here, we show that there is a particular type of co-orbital configuration that may be confirmed observationally: the quasi-satellite state. 2.1 Quasi-satellites: a short review and a lost specimen Minor bodies engaged in quasi-satellite behaviour with a host move near the host for the duration of the quasi-satellite episode although each pair minor-body -- host is not gravitationally bound. In the Solar system and from a frame of reference centred at the Sun but coro- tating with the host, the quasi-satellite appears to go around the host like a regular retrograde satellite but the physical distance between the two bodies is always greater than the radius of the Hill sphere of the host (see e.g. fig. 1 in Mikkola et al. 2004). The quasi-satellite state is one of the dynamical epitomes of the 1:1 mean motion or co-orbital resonance, the other two being the Trojan or tadpole and the horseshoe resonant states (see e.g. Murray & Dermott 1999; Mikkola et al. 2006). 2 C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente Marcos Dynamical classification within the 1:1 mean motion reso- nance is based on the study of a critical angle, the relative mean longitude, λr, or difference between the mean longitude of the ob- ject and that of its host. If λr librates or oscillates over time, then the object under study is a co-orbital. In principle, this can only be con- firmed via N-body simulations. Quasi-satellites exhibit libration of λr about 0◦(for additional details, see e.g. Mikkola et al. 2006; de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2014, 2016a,b). The existence of quasi-satellites was predicted more than a century ago (Jackson 1913), but the first bona fide quasi-satellite was not identified until much later -- 2002 VE68 was confirmed as quasi-satellite of Venus by Mikkola et al. (2004). However, the first quasi-satellite may have been identified in 1973 although it was apparently lost shortly after. Using numerical integrations, Cheb- otarev (1974)1 showed that the so-called minor planet 7617 (see his fig. 5 and table 5) was a quasi-satellite of Jupiter although he regarded this object as a distant Jovian satellite. This minor planet 7617 is clearly (see table 5 in Chebotarev 1974) not aster- oid 7617 (1996 VF30), as Chebotarev (1974) followed the number- ing scheme in van Houten et al. (1970). The orbital elements (1950 equinox) of the mysterious minor planet 7617 in van Houten et al. (1970) -- a = 5.0785 au, e = 0.6179, i = 4.◦080, Ω = 68.◦81 and ω = 209.◦23 -- do not match those of any known asteroid or comet; therefore, it is pressumed lost. 2.2 Theoretical expectations When observed from a celestial object (planetary or not) true satel- lites (not following synchronous orbits), co-orbitals of the Trojan or horseshoe type, and passing objects describe roughly sinusoidal paths in the sky over a sidereal orbital period. In sharp contrast, quasi-satellites appear to orbit the host when viewed in a heliocen- tric frame of reference that rotates with the host. As their orbital periods are very close to the sidereal period of the host, the stan- dard sinusoidal trace becomes compressed longitudinally turning into an analemmatic curve. The analemma or analemmatic curve -- the figure-eight loop -- has been traditionally linked to graphic depictions of the changing of the seasons and the equation of time (see e.g. Heath 1923; Raisz 1942; Oliver 1972; di Cicco 1979; Irvine 2001; Hol- brow 2013). In addition, the trajectories of geosynchronous satel- lites as observed from the ground have the appearance of an analemma (Chalmers 1987). From the host, the apparent motion of a quasi-satellite during a sidereal orbital period is not too different from that of true satellites moving in synchronous orbits. In order to show that a given quasi-satellite traces an analem- matic curve, we proceed as follows. We perform full N-body sim- ulations in ecliptic coordinates; at time t, for a given host of co- ordinates, (xh, yh, zh), and axial tilt or obliquity, ǫ, and a certain quasi-satellite located at (xqs, yqs, zqs) we can define the host-centric equatorial coordinates, (α∗, δ∗): r cos α∗ cos δ∗ = xqs − xh r sin α∗ cos δ∗ = (yqs − yh) cos ǫ − (zqs − zh) sin ǫ r sin δ∗ = (yqs − yh) sin ǫ + (zqs − zh) cos ǫ , (1) where r is the distance between host and quasi-satellite at time t. For the particular case of the Earth, (α∗, δ∗) become (α, δ), the usual geocentric equatorial coordinates. Over one sidereal period, there is a north-south oscillation of δ∗ that is responsible for the lengthwise extension of the analemma pattern. Such libration is induced by the fact that the orbital plane of the quasi-satellite and the celestial equator at the host are, in general, tilted by a certain amount. In addition, the relative motion of a quasi-satellite with respect to its host is not uniform because, in a typical case, their orbital eccen- tricities are different although their semimajor axes are nearly equal and this tends to distort the analemma. The observed apparent mo- tion results from the interplay between the two effects; when both have comparable strengths, the familiar figure-eight is obtained. In the particular case of the Earth and for an ideal quasi-satellite bright enough to be observed year-round with standard ground-based tele- scopes, regular astrometric observations should make it possible to plot the associated analemmatic curve without any help from numerical computations. Unfortunately, no such quasi-satellite is known to exist and N-body simulations are needed to produce syn- thetic astrometry to confirm the theoretical expectations. The apparent motion of the objects studied here and plotted in Figs 1 and 2 has been computed using the Hermite scheme (Makino 1991; Aarseth 2003).2 The Cartesian state vectors of the integrated bodies at the epoch 2457600.5 JD TDB (2016-July-31.0) have been retrieved from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's (JPL) horizons3 sys- tem (Giorgini et al. 1996); this epoch is the t = 0 instant in the simulations. Full details of these calculations can be found in de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos (2012b, 2014, 2016a,b). 2.3 The case of Venus Asteroid 2002 VE68 was confirmed as quasi-satellite of Venus by Mikkola et al. (2004). The orbital evolution of this object was fur- ther studied in de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos (2012b). Its orbit is quite eccentric (e = 0.4103) and moderately inclined (i = 9.◦0070). Fig. 1, top left-hand panel, shows the results of equa- tions (1) from t = 0 until 10 yr later, i.e. over 16 orbital sidereal periods of Venus. Over 16 analemmatic loops are displayed and, consistent with its significant eccentricity, one of the lobes of the analemma is very small, each loop resembling an inverted teardrop. 2.4 The case of the Earth Our calculations show that our planet hosts the largest known pop- ulation of quasi-satellites in the Solar system; however, their dy- namical origin appears to be rather heterogeneous (de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2014, 2016a,b). There are five con- firmed quasi-satellites of the Earth: 164207 (2004 GU9) (Connors et al. 2004; Mikkola et al. 2006; Wajer 2010), 277810 (2006 FV35) (Wiegert et al. 2008; Wajer 2010), 2013 LX28 (Connors 2014), 2014 OL339 (de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2014, 2016a) and 469219 (2016 HO3)4 (de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2016b). Fig. 1, top right-hand panel, shows the ap- parent motion of these five objects over 10 sidereal periods; a wide range of behaviours, from a very symmetric figure-eight to very distorted teardrop shapes, is observed. Asteroid 164207 (purple) has both moderate eccentricity (e = 0.1362) and inclination (i = 13.◦6491), and it traces a somewhat symmetric figure-eight that slowly shifts, keeping the position of 1 Originally published in Russian, Astron. Zh., 50, 1071-1075 (1973 September -- October). 2 http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/∼sverre/web/pages/nbody.htm 3 http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?horizons 4 http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=6537 MNRAS 000, 1 -- 6 (2016) The analemma criterion for quasi-satellites 3 20 10 0 -10 -20 ) o ( * δ -30 24 20 16 12 α* (o) 8 4 0 ) o ( * δ 40 20 0 -20 -40 ) o ( δ ) o ( * δ 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 24 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 164207 (2004 GU9) 2014 OL339 469219 (2016 HO3) 2013 LX28 277810 (2006 FV35) 20 16 12 α (o) 8 4 0 2004 AE9 Comet 295P/LINEAR (2002 AR2) 241944 (2002 CU147) 8 4 0 12 α* (o) 24 20 16 12 α* (o) 8 4 0 24 20 16 ) o ( * δ 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 24 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 ) o ( * δ 20 16 12 α* (o) 8 4 0 24 20 16 12 α* (o) 8 4 0 Figure 1. Apparent motion in host-centric equatorial coordinates of known quasi-satellites. Asteroid 2002 VE68 from Venus (top left-hand panel), 164207 (2004 GU9), 277810 (2006 FV35), 2013 LX28, 2014 OL339 and 469219 (2016 HO3) from the Earth (top right-hand panel), 76146 (2000 EU16) from Ceres (middle left-hand panel), comet 295P/LINEAR (2002 AR2), 241944 (2002 CU147) and 2004 AE9 from Jupiter (middle right-hand panel), 63252 (2001 BL41) from Saturn (bottom left-hand panel), and 309239 (2007 RW10) from Neptune (bottom right-hand panel). the node almost fixed. Asteroid 277810 (gold) has significant ec- centricity (e = 0.3776), but low orbital inclination (i = 7.◦1041); consistently, its apparent motion describes a very distorted teardrop as the effect of the eccentricity dominates. Asteroid 2013 LX28 (green) follows a quite eccentric (e = 0.4520) and very inclined (i = 49.◦9754) path that translates into an apparent motion that traces an elongated teardrop-shaped curve. Asteroid 2014 OL339 (blue) describes a somewhat elliptic analemma which suggests that one of the effects is nearly negligible; consistently, it follows a very eccentric (e = 0.4608) but moderately inclined (i = 10.◦1868) orbit. Finally, the orbit pursued by 469219 (red) has both low eccentric- ity (e = 0.1041) and inclination (i = 7.◦77140); consistently, the analemma described in the sky resembles that of 164207 with a rather symmetric shifting figure-eight. 2.5 The case of Ceres Planets are not the only possible hosts of quasi-satellite bodies, dwarf planet Ceres also has one of these interesting companions (Christou 2000; Christou & Wiegert 2012), 76146 (2000 EU16). Fig. 1, middle left-hand panel, shows the results of nearly 11 sidereal periods. Asteroid 76146 follows a low-eccentricity (e = 0.1674), low-inclination (i = 8.◦8475) orbit; surprisingly, its rela- tively low eccentricity is high enough to induce a rather distorted teardrop shape to the resulting analemma. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 6 (2016) 2.6 The case of Jupiter Jupiter is often regarded as the host of the largest known popu- lation of quasi-satellites with at least six, including asteroids and comets (Kinoshita & Nakai 2007; Wajer & Królikowska 2012). However, we failed to confirm several of the proposed candidates as present-day quasi-satellites of Jupiter. We have found three con- firmed quasi-satellites of Jupiter: comet 295P/LINEAR (2002 AR2) (Kinoshita & Nakai 2007; Wajer & Królikowska 2012), 241944 (2002 CU147) (Wajer & Królikowska 2012) and 2004 AE9 (Ki- noshita & Nakai 2007; Wajer & Królikowska 2012). Fig. 1, mid- dle right-hand panel, shows the results of 8.4 sidereal periods of apparent motion for these objects. Comet 295P/LINEAR (red) fol- lows a very eccentric orbit (e = 0.6460) that is only moderately inclined (i = 14.◦6912); consistently, a rather asymmetric figure- eight is observed. This object is unlikely to be the mysterious mi- nor planet 7617 in van Houten et al. (1970), the angular elements being too different. Asteroid 241944 (blue) pursues a relatively ec- centric orbit (e = 0.3136) that is also quite inclined (i = 32.◦8906); the relatively rapidly shifting analemma exhibits somewhat sym- metric lobes. In sharp contrast, 2004 AE9 follows a very eccentric (e = 0.6459) but nearly ecliptic (i = 1.◦6521) orbit and its apparent motion as seen from Jupiter traces a very squashed teardrop. Again, the angular elements of 2004 AE9 are very different from those of the mysterious minor planet 7617. 4 C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente Marcos 2.7 The case of Saturn Gallardo (2006) indicated that 15504 (1999 RG33) could be a quasi- satellite of Saturn. Our calculations show that it is indeed a tran- sient co-orbital of Saturn, but not a quasi-satellite like the objects previously discussed. Its apparent motion somewhat resembles that of Molniya-type artificial satellites of the Earth (the apocentre of the very eccentric orbits occurs at a large declination). However, 63252 (2001 BL41) that was discovered by Gehrels et al. (2001) is currently a short-lived quasi-satellite of Saturn that will change its current dynamical status in about 130 yr from now. Asteroid 63252 follows an eccentric (e = 0.2948) but moderately inclined (i = 12.◦5163) orbit. Fig. 1, bottom left-hand panel, shows the ap- parent motion of this object as seen from Saturn for about 4.4 side- real periods, prior to leaving its current quasi-satellite state. The analemmatic loops described by this object are very distorted as a result of its unstable dynamical behaviour and the lobes have some- what different sizes because the effect derived from eccentricity is stronger than that of inclination. Although its orbital evolution is rather chaotic, 63252 -- an organic rich D-type asteroid (Dores- soundiram et al. 2003) -- has been pre-selected by NASA for an in situ exploration mission (Ryan et al. 2009). 2.8 The case of Neptune Asteroid 309239 (2007 RW10) is so far the only confirmed quasi- satellite of Neptune (de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2012a) and it is one of the largest known co-orbital companions in the Solar system with a diameter of about 250 km. It follows an eccentric (e = 0.3004) and rather inclined (i = 36.◦1755) orbit. Fig. 1, bottom right-hand panel, shows 7.3 sidereal periods of a very regular analemma of the figure-eight type with both lobes of nearly the same size which confirms that the effects derived from eccentricity and inclination have very similar strength in this case. 3 ACCIDENTAL QUASI-SATELLITES: THE CASE OF PLUTINO 15810 (1994 JR1) Quasi-satellites are not exclusive of planetary hosts as the case of 76146 (2000 EU16) and Ceres confirms. Yu & Tremaine (1999) and Tiscareno & Malhotra (2009) used numerical simulations to predict the existence of minor bodies experiencing quasi-satellite behaviour with respect to dwarf planet Pluto. Plutino 15810 (1994 JR1) was identified as an accidental quasi-satellite of Pluto by de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos (2012c). It was termed ac- cidental because, for this object, λr circulates with a superimposed libration resulting from the oscillation of the orbital period induced by the 2:3 mean motion resonance with Neptune. Such libration plays a role in triggering and terminating the quasi-satellite phase. Porter et al. (2016) have used astrometry acquired by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft to improve the already robust orbital solution available for this object (see Appendix A) and revisit its quasi- satellite status. The new data have been used to argue that the quasi- satellite nature of 15810 must be rejected.5 Fig. 2 clearly shows that although the orbital solution of 15810 has been indeed greatly improved using New Horizons data (see Appendix A), its orbital evolution still matches the one described in de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos (2012c). In black, 5 http://www.nasa.gov/feature/new-horizons-collects-first-science-on-a- post-pluto-object ) o ( * δ 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 24 20 16 12 α* (o) 8 4 0 Figure 2. Apparent motion in Pluto-centric equatorial coordinates of 15810 (1994 JR1). The black curve shows the shifting analemma resulting from the dynamical evolution of the latest version of the orbit that includes data from NASA's New Horizons spacecraft (third orbital solution in Table A1). The green curve is equivalent to the black one but using the second orbital solution in Table A1. we have the apparent motion resulting from the latest orbit avail- able for 15810 (third orbital solution in Table A1). The figure displays the time interval of interest -- the one showing analem- matic behaviour -- that goes from 1200 years prior to t = 0 to 200 years afterwards or about 5.6 sidereal orbital periods of Pluto. The analemma shifts rapidly and it is quite distorted because the orbits of both Pluto and 15810 are eccentric and there is a chaotic inter- action between the two bodies. Within the context of the analemma criterion, the behaviour observed in Fig. 2 is not very different from that of some of the objects in Fig. 1. The apparent motion of 15810 closely resembles that of comet 295P/LINEAR (2002 AR2) or 63252 (2001 BL41). If the pre-NASA's New Horizons distant en- counter orbit (second orbital solution in Table A1) is used (green curve), the differences are minimal. Porter et al. (2016) argue that, for 15810, instead of transient quasi-satellite behaviour we should speak of periodic (every 2.4 Myr) scattering conjunctions; how- ever, Fig. 2 suggests that 15810 is not different from comet 295P or 63252 in dynamical terms when the analemma criterion is applied during one of its encounters with Pluto. Therefore, Pluto has at least one present-day (transient and recurrent) quasi-satellite, 15810. 4 DISCUSSION Our analysis so far argues in favour of a conjecture: objects that follow a quasi-satellite path with respect to a host trace an analem- matic curve in the sky as observed from the host over a sidereal or- bital period. Conversely, any object tracing an analemmatic curve in the sky as observed from the host over a sidereal year must be a quasi-satellite of the host. Unfortunately, a rigorous mathematical or even a numerical proof of the assumed theorem and its inverse is out of the scope of this work because (1) a complete theory of quasi-satellite motion still remains elusive (see e.g. Mikkola et al. 2006) and (2) the relevant volume of the orbital parameter space to be explored is simply too large. Intuitively, the truthfulness of our conjecture can hardly be argued. The position of the quasi-satellite as seen from the host is subjected to two periodic librations. At some point during the sidereal year, the quasi-satellite is east of the host, very nearly half an orbital period later it is west from the host. As the quasi-satellite bean-shaped loop (see e.g. fig. 1 in Mikkola et al. 2004) drifts back and forth, the peri-host shifts from eastwards to westwards from the host (this causes the loop drift). This behaviour is mainly the result of the difference in eccentricity between host and quasi-satellite and drives the oscillation in host- centric right ascension. The relative inclination between the equa- MNRAS 000, 1 -- 6 (2016) torial plane of the host and the orbital plane of the quasi-satellite drives the oscillation in host-centric declination. These two oscil- lations have (nearly) commensurable frequencies because host and quasi-satellite have very similar orbital periods and generate the analemma. Co-orbitals have been traditionally classified as such after the statistical analysis of numerical simulations. However, an algo- rithm to decide whether an object is a quasi-satellite of a given host, not based on N-body simulations, is described in detail in section 4 of Mikkola et al. (2006). The analemmas or analemmata in Figs 1 and 2 show that, in the particular case of quasi-satellites, astrom- etry can be readily used to perform a reliable classification. Figs 1 and 2 also show that both very regular -- 164207 (2004 GU9), 469219 (2016 HO3) or 309239 (2007 RW10) -- and rather irregular -- comet 295P/LINEAR (2002 AR2), 63252 (2001 BL41) or 15810 (1994 JR1) -- short-term evolutions are possible. The analemma traced by the quasi-satellite encodes relevant orbital information. Distorted, rapidly shifting analemmas are characteristic of quasi- satellites moving in strongly perturbed orbits. Our calculations show that, if a suitable quasi-satellite is found, it can be used as a permanent platform to install instru- mentation that may be used to monitor permanently the host body and enable a relatively stable communications relay for subsequent missions (e. g. landing quasi-autonomous vehicles on the host) at zero fuel cost because the quasi-satellite behaves like a geosyn- chronous satellite from the point of view of the host body. For this task, the smaller its average distance from the host the better (see e.g. the case of 469219 as discussed in de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2016b). Artificial quasi-satellites are also possible (see e.g. Kogan 1989 for the Phobos mission). For quasi-satellites sufficiently close to a host, substantial parallax may occur; there- fore, and depending on the location of the observer on the surface of the host, different analemmas may be observed. This issue to- gether with the shift of the analemma loop induced by orbital evo- lution requires robotic tracking of the quasi-satellite yearly move- ment around its analemma. The use of quasi-satellite trajectories in astrodynamics has been frequently discussed (see e.g. Kogan 1989; Lidov & Vashkov'yak 1993, 1994; Mikkola & Prioroc 2016). It could be the case that the analemmatic behaviour described here had been found before within the context of astrodynamical studies (see e.g. Kogan 1989). 5 CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we have explored a new criterion to identify quasi- satellites. In sharp contrast with the numerical strategies customar- ily applied in the study of co-orbital bodies, the criterion described here can make direct use of observational astrometric data. Our conclusions can be summarized as follows. (i) Bona fide quasi-satellites trace paths in the sky which repeat every sidereal period when observed from their hosts. These paths can be described as analemmatic curves similar to those found for geosynchronous orbits. The analemma shifts as the orbit of the quasi-satellite changes over time. (ii) The existence of this analemmatic behaviour turns quasi- satellites, natural or artificial, into potentially interesting plat- forms for the future of space exploration. (iii) The Earth has the largest known number of present-day quasi-satellites, five. Jupiter comes in second place with three. Venus, Saturn, Neptune and dwarf planet Ceres have one each. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 6 (2016) The analemma criterion for quasi-satellites 5 (iv) Applying the analemma criterion, Plutino 15810 (1994 JR1) is as good a quasi-satellite as it may get. Therefore, dwarf planet Pluto hosts at least one quasi-satellite at present. (v) Asteroid 63252 (2001 BL41) is a present-day transient quasi- satellite of Saturn. (vi) Historically, the first object identified as quasi-satellite (in this case of Jupiter) was an asteroid moving in a comet-like orbit. Unfortunately, this object appears to have been lost since its announcement back in 1973. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the referee, S. Mikkola, for his prompt reports, S. J. Aarseth for providing the code used in this research, and S. B. Porter for discussing the results of his group with us prior to pub- lication. In preparation of this paper, we made use of the NASA Astrophysics Data System, the ASTRO-PH e-print server, and the MPC data server. REFERENCES Aarseth S. J., 2003, Gravitational N-body simulations. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p. 27 Chalmers J. S., 1987, Am. J. Phys., 55, 548 Chebotarev G. A., 1974, SvA, 17, 677 Christou A. A., 2000, A&A, 356, L71 Christou A. A., Wiegert P., 2012, Icarus, 217, 27 Connors M., 2014, MNRAS, 437, L85 Connors M., Veillet C., Brasser R., Wiegert P., Chodas P., Mikkola S., In- nanen K., 2004, Meteoritics Planet. Sci., 39, 1251 de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2012a, A&A, 545, L9 de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2012b, MNRAS, 427, 728 de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2012c, MNRAS, 427, L85 de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2961 de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2016a, MNRAS, 455, 4030 de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2016b, MNRAS, in press (arXiv:1608.01518) di Cicco D., 1979, Sky Telescope, 57, 536 Doressoundiram A., Tozzi G. P., Barucci M. A., Boehnhardt H., Fornasier S., Romon J., 2003, AJ, 125, 2721 Gallardo T., 2006, Icarus, 184, 29 Gehrels T., Gleason A. E., McMillan R. S., Montani J. L., Larsen J. A., Marsden B. G., 2001, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2001-B44 Giorgini J. D. et al., 1996, BAAS, 28, 1158 Heath W., 1923, The Observatory, 46, 286 Holbrow C. H., 2013, e-print arXiv:1302.0765 Irvine S., 2001, J. R. Astron. Soc. Can., 95, 273 Jackson J., 1913, MNRAS, 74, 62 Kinoshita H., Nakai H., 2007, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 98, 181 Kogan A. Y., 1989, Cosmic Res., 26, 705 Lidov M. L., Vashkov'yak M. A., 1993, Cosmic Res., 31, 187 Lidov M. L., Vashkov'yak M. A., 1994, Astron. Lett., 20, 188 Makino J., 1991, ApJ, 369, 200 Mikkola S., Brasser R., Wiegert P., Innanen K., 2004, MNRAS, 351, L63 Mikkola S., Innanen K., Wiegert P., Connors M., Brasser R., 2006, MN- RAS, 369, 15 Mikkola S., Prioroc C.-L., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 1137 Morais M. H. M., Morbidelli A., 2002, Icarus, 160, 1 Murray C. D., Dermott S. F., 1999, Solar System Dynamics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p. 97 Oliver B. M., 1972, Sky Telescope, 44, 20 Porter S. B. et al., 2016, ApJL, submitted (arXiv:1605.05376) Raisz E., 1942, Sky Telescope, 1, 11 Ryan E. L. et al., 2009, Am. Astron. Soc. -- DPS meeting, 41, 16.26 6 C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente Marcos Tiscareno M. S., Malhotra R., 2009, AJ, 138, 827 van Houten C. J., van Houten-Groeneveld I., Herget P., Gehrels T., 1970, A&AS, 2, 339 Wajer P., 2010, Icarus, 209, 488 Wajer P., Królikowska M., 2012, Acta Astron., 62, 113 Wiegert P. A., DeBoer R., Brasser R., Connors M., 2008, J. R. Astron. Soc. Can., 102, 52 Yu Q., Tremaine S., 1999, AJ, 118, 1873 APPENDIX A: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PRE- AND POST-NEW HORIZONS DATA ORBITAL SOLUTIONS Table A1 shows three orbital solutions for 15810 (1994 JR1). The third column corresponds to the one currently available and in- cludes astrometry acquired by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft and discussed in Porter et al. (2016). As pointed out by Porter et al. (2016), the New Horizons data have improved the orbital solu- tion of 15810 very significantly. However, numerical simulations equivalent to those in de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos (2012c) but making use of the second and third orbital solutions in Table A1 still produce the same basic results; the differences are simply too small to claim any dramatic change in the nature of the orbital evolution of 15810 as a result of the new and indeed im- proved orbit. The original description in de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos (2012c) is certainly still valid. Nevertheless, the astrometry discussed in Porter et al. (2016) confirms beyond any doubt the role that NASA's New Horizons spacecraft may play in improving the orbital solutions of many trans-Neptunian objects over the next decade or so. This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 6 (2016) The analemma criterion for quasi-satellites 7 Table A1. Heliocentric Keplerian orbital elements of 15810 (1994 JR1) from JPL's Small-Body Database and horizons On-Line Ephemeris System; values include the 1σ uncertainty. The orbit in the left-hand column was the one available back in 2012 and it was used by de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos (2012c); this orbit is referred to the epoch 2456200.5 JD CT (2012-September-30.0) and it was computed using 43 observations with an arc-length of 2236 d. The orbital solution in the column next to it was computed on 2015 October 05 13:55:21 ut and it is referred to the epoch 2457600.5 JD TDB (2016-July-31.0) TDB; it was computed using 49 observations with an arc-length of 7701 d. The third orbit is the one currently available and it was computed on 2016 June 21 15:49:21 ut. This new and improved orbital solution includes astrometry acquired by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft and is referred to the same epoch as the previous one; it was computed using 78 observations with an arc-length of 8002 d. Semimajor axis, a (au) Eccentricity, e Inclination, i (◦) Longitude of the ascending node, Ω (◦) Argument of perihelion, ω (◦) = = = = = 39.24±0.02 0.1143±0.0003 3.8032±0.0002 144.753±0.011 102.1±0.2 39.427±0.011 0.1196±0.0002 3.80801±0.00005 144.6859±0.0011 101.55±0.03 39.4224±0.0009 0.119501±0.000010 3.80802±0.00005 144.6854±0.0007 101.535±0.012 MNRAS 000, 1 -- 6 (2016)
1607.03602	1	1607	2016-07-13T06:26:13	Non-thermal production and escape of OH from the upper atmosphere of Mars	[ "astro-ph.EP", "physics.chem-ph" ]	We present a theoretical analysis of formation and kinetics of hot OH molecules in the upper atmosphere of Mars produced in reactions of thermal molecular hydrogen and energetic oxygen atoms. Two major sources of energetic O considered are the photochemical production, via dissociative recombination of O$_{2}^{+}$ ions, and energizing collisions with fast atoms produced by the precipitating Solar Wind (SW) ions, mostly H$^+$ and He$^{2+}$, and energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) originating in the charge-exchange collisions between the SW ions and atmospheric gases. Energizing collisions of O with atmospheric secondary hot atoms, induced by precipitating SW ions and ENAs, are also included in our consideration. The non-thermal reaction O + H$_2(v,j) \rightarrow$ H + OH$(v',j')$ is described using recent quantum-mechanical state-to-state cross sections, which allow us to predict non-equilibrium distributions of excited rotational and vibrational states $(v',j')$ of OH and expected emission spectra. A fraction of produced translationally hot OH is sufficiently energetic to overcome Mars' gravitational potential and escape into space, contributing to the hot corona. We estimate the total escape flux from dayside of Mars for low solar activity conditions at about $5\times10^{22}$ s$^{-1}$, or about 0.1\% of the total escape rate of atomic O and H. The described non-thermal OH production mechanism is general and expected to contribute to the evolution of atmospheres of the planets, satellites, and exoplanets with similar atmospheric compositions.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Non-thermal production and escape of OH from the upper atmosphere of Mars M. Gacesaa, N. Lewkowb, V. Kharchenkoc,b aNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 bDepartment of Physics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268 cInstitute for Theoretical Atomic and Molecular Physics, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138 Abstract We present a theoretical analysis of formation and kinetics of hot OH molecules in the upper atmosphere of Mars produced in reactions of thermal molecu- lar hydrogen and energetic oxygen atoms. Two major sources of energetic O considered are the photochemical production, via dissociative recombina- tion of O+ 2 ions, and energizing collisions with fast atoms produced by the precipitating Solar Wind (SW) ions, mostly H+ and He2+, and energetic neu- tral atoms (ENAs) originating in the charge-exchange collisions between the SW ions and atmospheric gases. Energizing collisions of O with atmospheric secondary hot atoms, induced by precipitating SW ions and ENAs, are also included in our consideration. The non-thermal reaction O + H2(v, j) → H + OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) is described using recent quantum-mechanical state-to-state cross sections, which allow us to predict non-equilibrium distributions of excited rotational and vibrational states (v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) of OH and expected emission spec- tra. A fraction of produced translationally hot OH is sufficiently energetic to overcome Mars' gravitational potential and escape into space, contributing to the hot corona. We estimate the total escape flux from dayside of Mars for low solar activity conditions at about 5× 1022 s−1, or about 0.1% of the total escape rate of atomic O and H. The described non-thermal OH production mechanism is general and expected to contribute to the evolution of atmo- spheres of the planets, satellites, and exoplanets with similar atmospheric compositions. Email addresses: [email protected] (M. Gacesa), [email protected] (N. Lewkow), [email protected] (V. Kharchenko) Preprint submitted to Icarus October 11, 2018 Keywords: 1. Introduction The escape of volatile atmospheric species to space is important for un- derstanding the evolution of Mars' atmosphere and climate as it transi- tioned from the conditions that supported liquid water into the cold, dry, low-pressure climate that we witness today (McElroy and Donahue, 1972; Johnson et al., 2008; Lammer et al., 2013; Lillis et al., 2015). While it is well established that the evaporation of the martian atmosphere is driven by the interaction with the solar radiation and interplanetary plasma, with the absence of an intrinsic planetary magnetic field and Mars' lower mass ac- celerating the process (Chassefi`ere and Leblanc, 2004; Johnson et al., 2008), detailed physical mechanisms and their mutual interactions are still not fully understood and 3D global atmospheric models cannot simultaneously ex- plain all observed effects (Lillis et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2015a,b). Attempting to resolve the remaining unanswered questions and shed light on water in- ventory in the early history of Mars is the main scientific objective of the ongoing NASA's Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN) mission (Jakosky et al., 2015; Bougher et al., 2015). At the present time, the atmospheric escape from Mars is comprised of thermal (Jeans) escape and various non-thermal mechanisms, including photo-chemical escape of neutrals (Chassefi`ere and Leblanc, 2004; Johnson et al., 2008; Lammer et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2015b) and escape of ions gov- erned by the interplay of the solar wind with the induced martian magne- tosphere and crustal magnetic fields (Acuna et al., 1999; Nagy et al., 2004; Dong et al., 2015; Rahmati et al., 2015). Major escaping species include atomic hydrogen, oxygen, and carbon, of which the first two directly affect the estimates of water abundance on primordial Mars (Lammer et al., 2013). A major photochemical process responsible for escape of neutrals heavier than hydrogen is dissociative recombination (DR) of O+ 2 , which serves as a major source of hot O atoms that either directly escape to space or form a hot oxygen corona (Ip, 1988; Fox, 1993; Krest'yanikova and Shematovich, 2005; Lee et al., 2015b; Deighan et al., 2015). The nascent suprathermal O atoms can collide with thermal background gases in the upper atmosphere and transfer sufficient kinetic energy to eject them to space. This non-thermal escape mechanism of light elements, also known as a collisional ejection, 2 was studied for He atoms (Bovino et al., 2011), and H2 and HD molecules (Gacesa et al., 2012), which were found to produce significant fluxes and possibly affect the H/D ratio in Mars' upper atmosphere by 5-10%. One of the major goals of our research, reported in this article, is to de- velop a consistent model of production of non-thermal atoms and molecules in the Martian atmosphere and describe non-equilibrium atmospheric reactions caused by hot particles. In this study, we explore reactive collisions of hot O atoms with H2 molecules, leading to formation of rotationally-vibrationally (RV) excited OH molecules in Mars' upper atmosphere. The description of the reaction is based on quantum-mechanical state-to-state reactive cross sections at high temperatures (Gacesa and Kharchenko, 2014), while kinetic theory is used to calculate the energy transfer to translational and internal degrees of freedom of the products. We use a 1D model of the martian atmo- sphere to estimate altitude profiles of the total formation and escape rates of OH molecules and non-thermal RV distributions for a selected orbital ge- ometry and solar activity. In addition to the DR, secondary hot O atoms energized in collisions with energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) (Lewkow and Kharchenko, 2014) are considered as an efficient source of hot O atoms in our model. 2. Methods 2.1. Hot atom sources We consider dissociative recombination (DR) of oxygen molecular ions 2 + e → O + O + ∆E, as the main source of hot O with electrons, O+ atoms. This process is widely accepted as the dominant source of O in the martian ionosphere in the current epoch (Ip, 1988; Fox, 1993; Krest'yanikova and Shematovich, 2005). The DR of O+ 2 is an exothermic process that can proceed via five dissociation pathways and produce energetic O(3P), O(1D), and O(1S) with excess kinetic energy between 0.84 eV and 6.99 eV per a pair (Guberman, 1988; Fox and Ha´c, 2009). Since the state-to-state cross sections are available only for the reaction of O(3P) + H2, we assume that all reactive collisions involve hot O(3P). This approximation is further justified by the fact that the lifetime of energetic metastable O(1D) atoms is short before they relax into their ground state via spontaneous emission or collisional quenching with atmospheric gases (Kharchenko et al., 2005). To evaluate the contribution of the photo-chemical production mecha- nism of energetic O atoms, we followed the approach of Bovino et al. (2011) 3 Figure 1: Energy distributions of hot O(3P ) produced by DR of O+ 2 and in collisions with energetic neutral H and He atoms. The distributions are normalized to unity and calculated at 200 km. to construct the energy distribution and rate of production of hot O atoms, fDR(Ei, h), as a function of the altitude h and the initial energy Ei of the O atoms dissociated via i-th channel. Four significant dissociation channels were considered with branching ratios and exothermicities given by Guber- man (1988) and Fox and Ha´c (2009). We constructed fDR(Ei, h) distributions of nascent O atoms below 400 km for conditions of low solar activity (Fox and Ha´c, 2009) and adopted the atmospheric model by Krasnopolsky (2010) with extrapolated hot O source functions from Fox and Ha´c (2009). As a secondary source of hot O atoms we considered elastic collisions of precipitating ENAs, namely energetic H and He, with thermal atmo- spheric oxygen, leading to production of secondary hot O atoms (SHOAs) (Krest'yanikova and Shematovich, 2005; Wang et al., 2013; Lewkow and Kharchenko, 2014). Incoming ENAs decelerate in the martian atmosphere by transferring a fraction of its kinetic energy to thermal atmospheric gases 4 012345Energy (eV)00.511.52Probability Density (1/eV)DR of O2+He ENAH ENAtypically in thousands of collisions dominated by small scattering angles. The SHOAs are produced mainly at altitudes lower than 250 km, where the atmo- spheric density sharply increases, and are predicted to have kinetic energies up to 4 eV (Lewkow and Kharchenko, 2014). We carried out a 3D Monte Carlo simulation of thermalization of ENAs in the martian atmosphere for average solar wind activity and constructed altitude-dependent SHOA source function fENA(h). A distinct feature of our MC approach are energy transfer cross sections given as functions of both collision velocity and angle, resulting in strongly forward-peaked anisotropic distributions. The simulation is de- scribed in detail in Lewkow and Kharchenko (2014). In this work we adopted similar physical parameters, including the ensemble sizes, as in the article. The energy distributions (normalized to unity) of hot O and its volume production rates as a function of altitude are given for DR and ENA produc- tion mechanisms in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, respectively. The total source function f (Ei, h), given in the units of volume production rate, was constructed as a sum of distributions produced by considering both non-thermal processes, f (Ei, h) = fDR(Ei, h) + fENA(Ei, h). For the altitudes higher than 250 km and lower than 130 km (in case of DR of O+ 2 ), the production rate distribu- tions were smoothly extrapolated with descending exponential functions to avoid unphysical discontinuities. The final results were not found to be de- pend much on the exact functional forms due to the fact that the production rates in the extrapolated regions are very small. The energy distributions given in Fig. 1 were calculated for the altitude of 200 km and do not change significantly for the altitudes at which majority of thermalization processes take place (Zhang et al., 2009; Fox and Ha´c, 2009). 2.2. Cross sections and kinetics of non-thermal OH production We use quantum-mechanical state-to-state reactive cross sections and dif- ferential cross sections (DCSs) (Gacesa and Kharchenko, 2014) to model the chemical reaction O(3P)+H2(v, j) → H + OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)), where (v, j) and (v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) are the initial and final RV levels of H2 and OH, respectively. The cross sec- tions of Gacesa et al. (2012) are adopted for elastic scattering. Both sets of cross sections were constructed in an extended collision energy range for pur- poses of modeling non-thermal atmospheric processes and high-temperature combustion. Momentum transfer reactive cross sections are evaluated according to 5 Figure 2: Altitude profile of the rate of production of secondary hot O(3P ) atoms by DR of O+ 2 and collisions of precipitating H and He ENAs with atmospheric O. Mean solar activity is assumed. (Parker and Pack, 1978) σmt vj,v(cid:48)j(cid:48)(E) = 2π (cid:90) ∞ 0 Qvj,v(cid:48)j(cid:48)(E, θ) (cid:32) 1 − cos θ (cid:33) (cid:114) E(cid:48) E sin θdθ, (1) where Qvj,v(cid:48)j(cid:48)(E, θ) are reactive differential cross sections (DCSs) and E(cid:48) = E − (Ev(cid:48)j(cid:48) − Evj) is the final energy of the product OH. Here, the internal RV energies of H2(v, j) and OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) are given by Evj and Ev(cid:48)j(cid:48), respectively. The RV energies Evj and Ev(cid:48)j(cid:48) were found using a mapped Fourier Grid Method (Kokoouline et al., 1999) in the asymptotic limits (corresponding to diatomic H2 and OH) of the potential energy surfaces used in Gacesa and Kharchenko (2014). The kinetic energy transfer rate from hot O atoms to the product OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) is determined using kinetic theory with quantized internal molecular degrees 6 10-310-210-1100101102103Production rate of hot O atoms by DR and ENAs (cm-3s-1)100200Altitude (km)H (ENA)He (ENA)O (DR)Figure 3: Fraction Γv(cid:48)j(cid:48) vj (E) of the OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) molecules produced in the reaction O+H2(v = 0, j = 0) having sufficient kinetic energy to escape from Mars given as a function of O atom kinetic energy. Selected rotationally (left panel) and vibrationally (right panel) excited states of OH are shown. of freedom and anisotropic cross sections as (Johnson, 1982) (cid:0)1 + γv(cid:48)j(cid:48) − 2 √ γv(cid:48)j(cid:48) cos θ(cid:1) E, (2) Tv(cid:48)j(cid:48) = mO mOH (mO + mOH)2 where mO and mOH are masses of O and OH, respectively, E is the collision energy in the laboratory frame (LF), γv(cid:48)j(cid:48) = v(cid:48)j(cid:48)/, is the ratio of and v(cid:48)j(cid:48), the translational kinetic energies before and after the reaction in the center- of-mass (CM) frame, respectively, and θ is the scattering angle in the CM frame. Following the reaction, the fraction of OH molecules sufficiently energetic to escape is given by Γv(cid:48)j(cid:48) vj (E) = (cid:82) π (cid:82) π Qvj,v(cid:48)j(cid:48)(E, θ) (1 − cos θ) sin θdθ 0 Qvj,v(cid:48)j(cid:48)(E, θ) (1 − cos θ) sin θdθ θmin , (3) where the critical angle θmin was determined by solving Eq. (2) for the angle, while requiring that the translational part of the transferred kinetic 7 234Energy of O atom (eV)00.20.40.60.81Γvjv'j'(E)j'=010203035234Energy of O atom (eV)v'=0123456energy, Tv(cid:48),j(cid:48) is equal to the escape energy of OH from Mars, EOH esc = 2.08 eV. The resulting fractions Γv(cid:48)j(cid:48) vj (E) for the vibrational states up to vmax = 6 and jmax = 36 were calculated and illustrated in Fig. 3 for selected values of (v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) states. According to the kinetic model, the OH molecules could be produced in the reaction in higher RV levels but they would not receive sufficient kinetic energy to be able to escape. 2.3. 1D transport model To determine the transport of non-thermal atoms and molecules, includ- ing altitude profiles of OH, we use a 1D model built upon analogous as- sumptions used in the study of escape of neutral He atoms and H2 molecules from Mars (Bovino et al., 2011; Gacesa et al., 2012). In our model, we use altitude-dependent rates of production of hot oxygen, f (E, h) by both DR of O+ 2 and precipitating ENAs, as described in the previous section. The atten- uation of fluxes of hot O and OH is estimated based on their mean free path in thermal atmospheric gases. Such an approach is a compromise between a simple exobase approximation and more complex Monte Carlo simulation. In comparison, our multi-species 3D Monte Carlo simulation of the ENA- induced escape of hydrogen predicted about 40% higher escape rates than a 1D model (Lewkow and Kharchenko, 2014). With the above assumptions, the volume production rate of hot OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) at the altitude h can be written as Pv(cid:48)j(cid:48)(h) = 1 2 × (cid:90) ∞ (cid:90) h 0 hmin 2 dE TOH(h, E)nH2(h)Γv(cid:48)j(cid:48) vj (E)σmt vj,v(cid:48)j(cid:48)(E) dh2f (E, h2)TO(h2, h, E), (4) where f (E, h) is the total hot O source function, Γv(cid:48)j(cid:48) vj (E) is the fraction of the OH molecules energetically allowed to escape, σmt vj,v(cid:48)j(cid:48)(E) is the momentum transfer reactive cross section, and nH2(h) is the density of atmospheric H2 gas taking part in reactions. The prefactor 1/2 implies that one half of the produced energetic OH molecules are scattered towards the planet and cannot escape regardless of the energy transferred. The transparencies TOH and TO are defined as (cid:35) TOH(h, E) = exp OH,i (E)ni(h(cid:48)) σel,mt (cid:34) − (cid:90) hmax dh(cid:48)(cid:88) i h 8 TO(h2, h, E) = exp (cid:34) − (cid:90) h h2 dh(cid:48)(cid:88) i (cid:35) O,i (E)ni(h(cid:48)) σel,mt , (5) and describe the loss of flux due to the collisions with thermal atmospheric species. Specifically, TOH is equal to the escape probability of hot OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) produced in collisions with the incident hot O of energy E at the altitude h, while the TO is defined as the probability that the hot O atoms, produced at the altitude h2, reach the altitude h without the energy loss in collisions with other atmospheric constituents. The sums describe the loss of O and OH flux in collisions with major constituents of the martian upper atmosphere, where, for the i-th atmospheric species, ni(h) is the density, and σel,mt H2,i (E) and σel,mt O,i (E) are elastic momentum transfer cross sections. Eight species were included in the summation: CO2, CO, N2, O2, H2, H, Ar, and H. We use only the elastic cross sections, which are about an order of magnitude larger than reactive or inelastic cross sections, to evaluate the transparencies. The integrals were evaluated using hmin and hmax as practical integration limits, taken to be 130 km and 800 km, respectively. We used the momentum transfer cross sections for OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48))+H scatter- ing calculated in our previous work (Gacesa and Kharchenko, 2014). For collisions with the other species we approximated the cross sections by mass- scaling from known species: OH-He (from Ar-H2), OH-N2, OH-O2, OH-CO (from O-H2), and OH-CO2 (from O-N2 (Balakrishnan et al., 1998)). Simi- larly, the cross sections for O-N2, O-O2, O-He, and O-H were adopted from Balakrishnan et al. (1998), Brunetti et al. (1981), Bovino et al. (2011), and Zhang et al. (2009), respectively. As an additional simplification, we did not include O-O collisions in the flux attenuation since they do not reduce the total kinetic energy in the upward flux of hot O atoms. We also assume that all reactive collisions of O+H2 take place with molecular hydrogen in its ground state, (v = 0, j = 0), while at T = 280 K, first three rotational states (j = 0, 1, 2) will be significantly populated. We do not expect this approximation to introduce significant errors since the differences in reactive cross sections between these states are smaller than 3%. 2 3. Altitude profile of hot OH Using Eq. (4) we have calculated volume production rate of hot OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) molecules in the reaction H2(v = 0, j = 0) + O at the altitudes ranging from hmin = 130 km to hmax = 700 km, for all energetically-allowed target RV 9 Figure 4: Altitude profiles of volume production rates of vibrationally excited OH(v(cid:48) = 0 . . . 6) produced in reactions with non-thermal O atoms. The rates are summed over rotational states j(cid:48) = 0 . . . 36 of OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)). states, v(cid:48) = 0 . . . 6 and j(cid:48) = 0 . . . 36. We have included both sources of hot O, DR and collisions with H and He ions and atoms, and performed the calcula- tion with and without (by setting the escaping fraction factor Γv(cid:48)j(cid:48) vj (E) = 1) the constraint on the kinetic energy of the product OH. The resulting al- j(cid:48) Pv(cid:48)j(cid:48)(h), are shown in Figs. 4 and 5, for the total and escaping volume production rate, respectively. titude profiles of vibrationally excited hot OH, Pv(cid:48)(h) = (cid:80) The volume production rates of hydroxyl molecules are very dependent on density of the atmosphere and availability of hot oxygen. They peak at about 210-220 km and remain significant below the exobase, up to about 170 km, below which the martian atmosphere becomes sufficiently dense to allow more efficient diffusive mixing and fast thermalization of hot oxygen. The production rates due to the ENA sources of hot O are about 500 times smaller than due to the DR, which is understood to be the dominant process 10 10-610-510-410-310-2Volume production rate of OH molecules (cm-3s-1)200300400500600700Altitude (km)TOTALv' = 0v' = 1v' = 2v' = 3v' = 4v' = 5v' = 6Figure 5: Altitude profiles of volume production rates of vibrationally excited nascent OH(v(cid:48) = 0 . . . 6) sufficiently energetic to escape produced in reactions with non-thermal O atoms. The rates are summed over rotational states j(cid:48) = 0 . . . 36 of OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) and shown for both sources of hot oxygen (thin lines for ENA). of non-thermal escape. Our model predicts that the non-thermal reaction will mostly produce OH in v(cid:48) = 0 vibrational state, followed by higher vibra- tional states up to v(cid:48) = 6, which comprises less than 1% of the population. A similar range of excited vibrational states is predicted for the OH ener- getically capable of escaping from Mars, even though the ratios between the individual excited states are somewhat different. This is particularly the case in enhanced rates for escaping OH(v(cid:48) = 2), which are comparable to those for OH(v(cid:48) = 1) state. We calculated the total production rates and the production rates of OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) capable of escaping as the product of the surface area of the dayside of Mars and the non-thermal flux φv(cid:48)j(cid:48) given by: φv(cid:48)j(cid:48) = Pv(cid:48)j(cid:48)(h)dh (6) (cid:90) hmax hmin 11 10-910-810-710-610-510-410-310-2Volume production rate of escaping OH molecules (cm-3s-1)200300400500600700Altitude (km)TOTALv' = 0v' = 1v' = 2v' = 3v' = 4v' = 5v' = 6DR + ENAENA onlyFigure 6: Top: Total production rates of OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) as a function of its rotational and vibrational states. Bottom: As above, for escaping OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)). The total production rates of OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) are shown in Fig. 6, where we also show distributions of rotational states j(cid:48) for each vibrational state v(cid:48). In case of the OH molecules sufficiently energetic to escape, the rates correspond to the number of OH molecules in a state (v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) potentially escaping from Mars at hmax = 700 km and can be compared with other escape processes. On the other hand, the total production rate, unconstrained with respect to the kinetic energy, gives an indication of the total number of excited OH(v(cid:48), j(cid:48)) molecules distributed according to the altitude profiles given in Fig. 4 on the dayside of the planet and can be used to evaluate the brightness of the emission spectra and Meinel bands of OH (Meinel, 1950). The total escape rates of OH, summed over all internal states and compared with the rates for Jeans and non-thermal escape of O, H, and H2 from literature, are given in Table 1. The produced hydroxyl molecule will decay mostly by predissociation, followed by direct photo-destruction, while interactions with solar wind ions are not expected to play a major role. The predissociation rates vary up 12 101910201021Prod. rate of OH (s-1)0102030Rotational state j'101910201021Prod. rate of OH (s-1)v' = 0v' = 1v' = 2v' = 3v' = 4v' = 5v' = 6Total rate (Γ = 1)Escaping OH onlyJeans (×1023 s−1) NT (×1023 s−1) OH H2 5.8a 1.0a 0.53 O H 530b 170-410c Table 1: Total non-thermal (NT) escape rates of OH from the ideal dayside of Mars calculated at 700 km, assuming Mars' volumetric mean radius equal to 3389.5 km and an ideal dayside. Published escape rates for H2, O, and H are shown for comparison (aGacesa and Kharchenko (2014), bJohnson et al. (2008), cLee et al. (2015b)). to about 30% with solar activity, and give a range of OH lifetimes of (1.13- 1.68)×105 sec for solar minimum conditions, considered in our calculation, and (1.04 − 1.49) × 105 sec for the solar maximum, with uncertainties of up to 20% (Budzien et al., 1994). The most important processes responsible for destruction of OH in the lower atmosphere of Mars include reactions with O, N, C, and H2, with the reaction rates of the order of (1 − 7) × 10−10 cm3s−1. The collisions with O will be a dominant mechanism of destruction at lower altitudes, where we can estimate the lifetime of OH to be of the order of 10-100 seconds, depending mainly on the atomic oxygen densities. This does not limit the escaping flux significantly. The lifetime of excited OH in the v(cid:48) = 2 and v(cid:48) = 1 is about 12 and 24 ms (van Dishoeck and Dalgarno, 1984), respectively, which allows the OH formed in the upper atmosphere to travel between 60-75 km (v = 1) or 115-150 km (v = 2) before decaying, mainly by spontaneous emission. Higher vibrational states will decay faster, resulting in faint Meinel emission bands localized at the regions where the OH production rates are the largest. 4. Conclusions We report the first theoretical model of non-thermal formation of excited OH molecules in the upper atmosphere of Mars in reactions of translation- ally hot O atoms and atmospheric H2. The produced OH is very energetic, capable of escaping into space, and expected to contribute a small fraction of rotationally and vibrationally excited hydroxyl molecules to the Martian hot corona. These OH molecules are expected to have lifetimes up to several hours providing they are not destroyed in collisions. We estimate that the process contributes up to about 0.1% of the total rate of escape of the Martian atmosphere to space. Our model is based on state-to-state energy dependent reactive cross sections for O+H2 reaction and a 1D model of transport in the Martian atmosphere. The hot O atoms produced by photo-dissociative 13 recombination of O+ 2 and collisions of thermal oxygen atoms with H and He ENAs were considered. The ENAs are found to contribute less than 1% to the total formation rates for the present-day solar flux. This non-thermal process could be identified by its characteristic emission profile from high rotational and vibrational states of OH (vibrational states up to v(cid:48) = 6 could be excited). Recently, Meinel emission bands up to (3 − 2) and (3 − 1) were detected in limb observations of Mars' atmosphere with MRO CRISP instrument and taken as a signature of presence of OH in the Martian atmosphere (Clancy et al., 2013). The emissions are likely to originate from the altitudes between 45 and 55 km, where the concentration of the OH is the highest, and are described well by the existing models that include relevant chemical processes in middle atmosphere. While low densities of OH in the upper atmosphere present a significant difficulty for observations, identification of emissions from high Meinel OH bands, with the intensities following the predicted altitude profile, would confirm the presence of this non-thermal process. Moreover, the described non-thermal mechanism and detailed information about populated excited states may be helpful in interpreting high-resolution spectra of neutrals in the upper atmosphere of Mars, leading to more accurate estimates of total escape rates of H2 and O from Mars. We expect that the developed model can be adapted to other planetary atmospheres where the described high-temperature reactions can take place, including comets. 5. Acknowledgments M.G.'s research was supported by an appointment to the NASA Postdoc- toral Program at the NASA Ames Research Center, administered by Univer- sities Space Research Association under contract with NASA. References Acuna, M., Connerney, J., Lin, R., Mitchell, D., Carlson, C., McFadden, J., Anderson, K., R`eme, H., Mazelle, C., Vignes, D., et al., 1999. Global dis- tribution of crustal magnetization discovered by the Mars Global Surveyor MAG/ER experiment. Science 284 (5415), 790 -- 793. 14 Balakrishnan, N., Kharchenko, V., Dalgarno, A., Oct. 1998. Slowing of en- ergetic O(3P) atoms in collisions with N2. J. Geophys. Res. 1032, 23393 -- 23398. Bougher, S. W., Cravens, T. E., Grebowsky, J., Luhmann, J., Dec. 2015. The Aeronomy of Mars: Characterization by MAVEN of the Upper Atmosphere Reservoir That Regulates Volatile Escape. Space Sci. Rev. 195, 423 -- 456. Bovino, S., Zhang, P., Gianturco, F. A., Dalgarno, A., Kharchenko, V., Jan. 2011. Energy transfer in O collisions with He isotopes and Helium escape from Mars. Geophys. Rev. Lett. 38, L02203. Brunetti, B., Liuti, G., Pirani, F., Vecchiocattivi, F., Luzzatti, E., Jun. 1981. Study of the interactions of atomic and molecular oxygen with O2 and N2 by scattering data. J. Chem. Phys. 74, 6734 -- 6741. Budzien, S. A., Festou, M. C., Feldman, P. D., Jan. 1994. Solar flux variabil- ity and the lifetimes of cometary H2O and OH. Icarus 107, 164. Chassefi`ere, E., Leblanc, F., Sep. 2004. Mars atmospheric escape and evolu- tion; interaction with the solar wind. Planet. Space Sci. 52, 1039 -- 1058. Clancy, R., Sandor, B. J., Garc´ıa-Munoz, A., Lef`evre, F., Smith, M. D., Wolff, M. J., Montmessin, F., Murchie, S. L., Nair, H., Sep. 2013. First detection of Mars atmospheric hydroxyl: CRISM Near-IR measurement versus LMD GCM simulation of OH Meinel band emission in the Mars polar winter atmosphere. Icarus 226, 272 -- 281. Deighan, J., Chaffin, M. S., Chaufray, J.-Y., Stewart, A. I. F., Schnei- der, N. M., Jain, S. K., Stiepen, A., Crismani, M., McClintock, W. E., Clarke, J. T., Holsclaw, G. M., Montmessin, F., Eparvier, F. G., Thie- mann, E. M. B., Chamberlin, P. C., Jakosky, B. M., Nov. 2015. MAVEN IUVS observation of the hot oxygen corona at Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 9009 -- 9014. Dong, C., Bougher, S. W., Ma, Y., Toth, G., Lee, Y., Nagy, A. F., Tenishev, V., Pawlowski, D. J., Combi, M. R., Najib, D., Sep. 2015. Solar wind interaction with the Martian upper atmosphere: Crustal field orientation, solar cycle, and seasonal variations. J. Geophys. Res. 120, 7857 -- 7872. 15 Fox, J. L., Sep. 1993. On the escape of oxygen and hydrogen from Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 1747 -- 1750. Fox, J. L., Ha´c, A. B., Dec. 2009. Photochemical escape of oxygen from Mars: A comparison of the exobase approximation to a Monte Carlo method. Icarus 204, 527 -- 544. Gacesa, M., Kharchenko, V., Oct. 2014. Quantum reactive scattering of O(3P)+H2 at collision energies up to 4.4 eV. J. Chem. Phys. 141 (16), 164324. Gacesa, M., Zhang, P., Kharchenko, V., May 2012. Non-thermal escape of molecular hydrogen from Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L10203. Guberman, S. L., Jan. 1988. The production of O(1D) from dissociative re- combination of O+ 2 . Planet. Space Sci. 36, 47 -- 53. Ip, W.-H., Oct. 1988. On a hot oxygen corona of Mars. Icarus 76, 135 -- 145. Jakosky, B. M., Lin, R. P., Grebowsky, J. M., Luhmann, J. G., Mitchell, D. F., Beutelschies, G., Priser, T., Acuna, M., Andersson, L., Baird, D., Baker, D., Bartlett, R., Benna, M., Bougher, S., Brain, D., Carson, D., Cauffman, S., Chamberlin, P., Chaufray, J.-Y., Cheatom, O., Clarke, J., Connerney, J., Cravens, T., Curtis, D., Delory, G., Demcak, S., De- Wolfe, A., Eparvier, F., Ergun, R., Eriksson, A., Espley, J., Fang, X., Folta, D., Fox, J., Gomez-Rosa, C., Habenicht, S., Halekas, J., Holsclaw, G., Houghton, M., Howard, R., Jarosz, M., Jedrich, N., Johnson, M., Kasprzak, W., Kelley, M., King, T., Lankton, M., Larson, D., Leblanc, F., Lefevre, F., Lillis, R., Mahaffy, P., Mazelle, C., McClintock, W., McFad- den, J., Mitchell, D. L., Montmessin, F., Morrissey, J., Peterson, W., Pos- sel, W., Sauvaud, J.-A., Schneider, N., Sidney, W., Sparacino, S., Stewart, A. I. F., Tolson, R., Toublanc, D., Waters, C., Woods, T., Yelle, R., Zurek, R., Dec. 2015. The Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution ( MAVEN) Mission. Space Sci. Rev. 195, 3 -- 48. Johnson, R. E., 1982. Introduction to atomic and molecular collisions. Plenum Press, 1982, New York. Johnson, R. E., Combi, M. R., Fox, J. L., Ip, W.-H., Leblanc, F., McGrath, M. A., Shematovich, V. I., Strobel, D. F., Waite, J. H., Aug. 2008. Exo- spheres and Atmospheric Escape. Space Sci. Rev. 139, 355 -- 397. 16 Kharchenko, V., Dalgarno, A., Fox, J. L., Dec. 2005. Thermospheric distri- bution of fast O(1D) atoms. J. Geophys. Res. 110, A12305. Kokoouline, V., Dulieu, O., Kosloff, R., Masnou-Seeuws, F., May 1999. Mapped Fourier methods for long-range molecules: Application to per- +) photoassociation spectrum. J. Chem. Phys. turbations in the Rb2(0u 110, 9865 -- 9876. Krasnopolsky, V. A., Jun. 2010. Solar activity variations of thermospheric temperatures on Mars and a problem of CO in the lower atmosphere. Icarus 207, 638 -- 647. Krest'yanikova, M. A., Shematovich, V. I., Jan. 2005. Stochastic models of hot planetary and satellite coronas: a photochemical source of hot Oxygen in the upper atmosphere of Mars. Sol. Syst. Res. 39, 22 -- 32. Lammer, H., Chassefi`ere, E., Karatekin, O., Morschhauser, A., Niles, P. B., Mousis, O., Odert, P., Mostl, U. V., Breuer, D., Dehant, V., Grott, M., Groller, H., Hauber, E., Pham, L. B. S., Jan. 2013. Outgassing History and Escape of the Martian Atmosphere and Water Inventory. Space Sci. Rev. 174, 113 -- 154. Lee, Y., Combi, M. R., Tenishev, V., Bougher, S. W., Deighan, J., Schneider, N. M., McClintock, W. E., Jakosky, B. M., Nov. 2015a. A comparison of 3-D model predictions of Mars' oxygen corona with early MAVEN IUVS observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 9015 -- 9022. Lee, Y., Combi, M. R., Tenishev, V., Bougher, S. W., Lillis, R. J., Nov. 2015b. Hot oxygen corona at Mars and the photochemical escape of oxygen: Improved description of the thermosphere, ionosphere, and exosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 120, 1880 -- 1892. Lewkow, N. R., Kharchenko, V., Aug. 2014. Precipitation of Energetic Neu- tral Atoms and Induced Non-thermal Escape Fluxes from the Martian Atmosphere. Astrophys. J. 790, 98. Lillis, R. J., Brain, D. A., Bougher, S. W., Leblanc, F., Luhmann, J. G., Jakosky, B. M., Modolo, R., Fox, J., Deighan, J., Fang, X., Wang, Y. C., Lee, Y., Dong, C., Ma, Y., Cravens, T., Andersson, L., Curry, S. M., Schneider, N., Combi, M., Stewart, I., Clarke, J., Grebowsky, J., Mitchell, 17 D. L., Yelle, R., Nagy, A. F., Baker, D., Lin, R. P., Dec. 2015. Charac- terizing Atmospheric Escape from Mars Today and Through Time, with MAVEN. Space Sci. Rev. 195, 357 -- 422. McElroy, M. B., Donahue, T. M., Sep. 1972. Stability of the Martian Atmo- sphere. Science 177, 986 -- 988. Meinel, I. A. B., May 1950. OH Emission Bands in the Spectrum of the Night Sky. Astrophys. J. 111, 555. Nagy, A. F., Winterhalter, D., Sauer, K., Cravens, T. E., Brecht, S., Mazelle, C., Crider, D., Kallio, E., Zakharov, A., Dubinin, E., Verigin, M., Kotova, G., Axford, W. I., Bertucci, C., Trotignon, J. G., Mar. 2004. The plasma Environment of Mars. Space Sci. Rev. 111, 33 -- 114. Parker, G. A., Pack, R. T., Feb. 1978. Rotationally and vibrationally inelastic scattering in the rotational IOS approximation. Ultrasimple calculation of total (differential, integral, and transport) cross sections for nonspherical molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 68, 1585 -- 1601. Rahmati, A., Larson, D. E., Cravens, T. E., Lillis, R. J., Dunn, P. A., Halekas, J. S., Connerney, J. E., Eparvier, F. G., Thiemann, E. M. B., Jakosky, B. M., Nov. 2015. MAVEN insights into oxygen pickup ions at Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8870 -- 8876. van Dishoeck, E. F., Dalgarno, A., Sep. 1984. The dissociation of OH and OD in comets by solar radiation. Icarus 59, 305 -- 313. Wang, X.-D., Barabash, S., Futaana, Y., Grigoriev, A., Wurz, P., Dec. 2013. Directionality and variability of energetic neutral hydrogen fluxes observed by Mars Express. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 7635 -- 7642. Zhang, P., Kharchenko, V., Jamieson, M. J., Dalgarno, A., Jul. 2009. Energy relaxation in collisions of hydrogen and deuterium with oxygen atoms. J. Geophys. Res. 114, A07101. 18
1809.01629	1	1809	2018-09-05T17:13:33	Magma oceans as a critical stage in the tectonic development of rocky planets	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Magma oceans are a common result of the high degree of heating that occurs during planet formation. It is thought that almost all of the large rocky bodies in the Solar System went through at least one magma ocean phase. In this paper, we review some of the ways in which magma ocean models for the Earth, Moon, and Mars match present day observations of mantle reservoirs, internal structure, and primordial crusts, and then we present new calculations for the oxidation state of the mantle produced during the magma ocean phase. The crystallization of magma oceans likely leads to a massive mantle overturn that may set up a stably stratified mantle. This may lead to significant delays or total prevention of plate tectonics on some planets. We review recent models that may help partly alleviate the mantle stability issue and lead to earlier onset of plate tectonics.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. doi:10.1098/not yet assigned Magma oceans as a critical stage in the tectonic development of rocky planets Laura Schaefer1,2,* and Linda T. Elkins-Tanton1 1School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA 2ORCID: 0000-0003-2915-5025 Keywords: magma oceans, planet formation, differentiation, accretion Summary Magma oceans are a common result of the high degree of heating that occurs during planet formation. It is thought that almost all of the large rocky bodies in the Solar System went through at least one magma ocean phase. In this paper, we review some of the ways in which magma ocean models for the Earth, Moon, and Mars match present day observations of mantle reservoirs, internal structure, and primordial crusts, and then we present new calculations for the oxidation state of the mantle produced during the magma ocean phase. The crystallization of magma oceans likely leads to a massive mantle overturn that may set up a stably stratified mantle. This may lead to significant delays or total prevention of plate tectonics on some planets. We review recent models that may help partly alleviate the mantle stability issue and lead to earlier onset of plate tectonics. Magma oceans are common Magma oceans appear to be a common outcome of formation processes for large rocky bodies [1,2]. Small planetesimals and embryos can form on very short timescales in the protoplanetary disk, so that they incorporate significant amounts of short-lived radionuclides such as 26Al and 60Fe that can produce enough heat to at least partially melt many of these objects [3,4]. Models suggest that the asteroid 4 Vesta, which is the source of the howardite-eucrite-diogenite (HED) meteorites, went through a magma ocean stage due to such short-lived heating [5-7]. Many iron meteorites, which are likely the remnants of differentiated planetesimals, have ages of only ~1 Myr after Solar System formation, indicating very early, short-lived magma oceans [8,9]. *Author for correspondence ([email protected]). 2 Larger objects like the Earth take long enough to assemble that short-lived radionuclides cannot provide sufficient heating to melt them. For these larger, later-assembling bodies, substantial heating can come from accretionary impacts [e.g. 10,11] and gravitational segregation of metallic iron into the centre of the planet. Giant impacts also appear to be common in N-body simulations of rocky planet formation [12], and are likely to cause wide-spread melting that can lead to differentiation in both silicates and metals [13]. In this paper we will discuss several ways in which forward magma ocean models do a good job of matching real-world observations of the Earth, Moon, and Mars. Magma ocean models can produce large, low-shear velocity provinces (LLSVPs) at the base of Earth's mantle through cumulate overturn and predict that these structures are stable over billions of years. Lunar magma ocean models can produce the internal differentiation of the Moon, including the anorthositic crust, the source regions for the picritic glasses and mare basalts, and the KREEP component, rich in incompatible elements. Models of the magma ocean on Mars can produce early crust, some of which may be preserved to the present day, and which could be hydrated by the earliest atmosphere to produce primordial clays. We also introduce new calculations that show that magma ocean models can produce the present-day mantle oxidation state of the Earth through metal-silicate equilibration within the magma ocean, with no additional mechanisms required. We will then discuss the mantle state at the end of the magma ocean period and discuss whether it can hinder or allow early onset of plate tectonics. Magma ocean models match observations Magma ocean models have been applied to all of the terrestrial planets, as well as the Earth's Moon. These models match observable properties of the present-day planets. The case for magma oceans on the Moon and Mars are easier to make because of the lack of active tectonic processing over most of the Solar System history. For the Earth, models can match deep mantle structures and the chemical properties of the mantle, including the abundances of trace elements and the present-day oxidation state. We review these model predictions below and present new calculations of the oxidation state of the magma ocean during core formation on the Earth. Differentiation of the Lunar Interior Magma ocean models were first fully developed to explain observations and measurements of Apollo returned samples from the Moon indicating that there was abundant plagioclase feldspar in the lunar crust [14-16]. The feldspar found in the lunar crust is nearly pure (> 98%) anorthosite, containing trace amounts of Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 3 mafic phases [15,17,18]. Lunar meteorites, remote spectroscopy and gravity field studies all support the wide- spread distribution of anorthosite in the lunar crust [19-21]. This widespread occurrence has led to the hypothesis that the Moon was at least partially molten and that anorthite plagioclase buoyantly segregated from the melt to form the crust [14-16]. This early silicate differentiation event is widely believed to have been a lunar magma ocean, which would be a natural consequence of the Moon-forming impact. In addition to the anorthositic crust, the existence of the highly incompatible element enriched KREEP (K, Rare Earth Element and P -rich) component, as well as the positive Eu anomalies in the highlands anorthosites and complementary negative Eu anomalies in mare basalts [e.g., 22-24] provide additional evidence in favour of a global lunar magma ocean. Models of metal-silicate partitioning during lunar core formation are also consistent with equilibration occurring at the lunar CMB, indicating a fully molten Moon [25]. Numerous authors have modelled the crystallization of the lunar magma ocean [e.g., 13, 26-33]. The lunar magma ocean would initially be fully molten at the surface and could rapidly cool and solidify by ~80% by volume in the first 1 ky [33]. The first solids would include Mg-rich olivine followed by orthopyroxene in the lower lunar mantle. Above 70-80% solidification, plagioclase begins to crystallize, and since it is lower in density than the magma ocean liquid, it should have floated to the surface to form a thermally conductive lid. Expulsion of trapped liquid by compaction and other processes would limit the amount of mafic minerals that could have formed in the crust, in agreement with observations [e.g., 34,35]. The magma ocean melt becomes more Fe-rich as crystallization proceeds, with a very dense ilmenite-bearing layer forming after about 95% crystallization. The residual liquids are very enriched in incompatible elements and have compositional characteristics similar to those found in the KREEP component [30]. Thermal models show that the conductive anorthositic crust (~40-50 km) would have delayed the solidification of the remaining magma ocean by ∼10 My [33]. However, ages for lunar crustal materials, discussed below, suggest that magma ocean crystallization was not complete until ~150 -- 200 Myrs. Recent models have shown, however, that tidal heating may extend the crystallization of this final magma ocean liquid out to 200 Myr [36,37]. Gravitationally driven cumulate overturn could produce later episodes of volcanism that would explain the ages and compositions of the Mg- suite of lunar crustal rocks [33]. Magma ocean crystallization experiments [32, 38, 39] reproduce many aspects of the numerical magma ocean models, including increasing density of the cumulates with crystallization, but some discrepancies remain. In particular, although liquid evolution trends are broadly similar between experiments Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 4 and models, the late stage liquid composition can differ significantly [Gaffney et al. in prep]. Recent experiments suggest that a dry lunar magma ocean would produce much thicker anorthositic crust than observed by the GRAIL mission, but a wet lunar magma ocean containing 270-1650 ppm of water would produce a thinner crust [38,39]. This water abundance is consistent with recent measurements of water abundances in lunar anorthosites [40]. Additional models including the effect of water on the crystallization time will be needed to compare with lunar geochronology measurements discussed below in order to confirm a wet lunar magma ocean. The age of lunar crustal anorthosites provides a constraint on the crystallization age of the lunar magma ocean, but measured ages cover a large span, from 4.47 to 4.29 Gyr [e.g., 41-46]. Kleine et al. [47] reviewed the isotopic ages for lunar samples available at the time and concluded that the combined constraints from the Hf-W and 147Sm-143Nd systems indicated that the lunar magma ocean reached ~70% crystallization, at which point anorthosite flotation should begin, no earlier than 60 Myrs and no later than 150 Myrs. Borg et al. [48] reported a very young age of crystallization of a ferroan anorthosite of 4360 +/- 3 million years from combined analysis of the 207Pb-206Pb, 147Sm-143Nd and 146Sm-142Nd isotopic systems, making this the most reliable FAN age, and suggested that the lunar crust was produced by non-magma ocean processes such as serial magmatism. Boyet et al. [49] measured Sm-Nd systematics in several lunar ferroan anorthosite samples and found that they did not form a single isochron, which the authors suggest indicates that all but one of these samples formed through later magmatism or processing after the lunar magma ocean crystallization. The one sample with the largest deficit in 142Nd gave a crystallization age of 60-125 Myr after Solar System formation for lunar crust formation. Recent results from Pb-isotopic evolution in lunar basalts has suggested a large differentiation event at 4376 ± 18 Myrs, which could coincide with the last stages of lunar magma ocean crystallization [50], consistent with the 142Nd ages for FAN 60025 [48]. Ages determined for lunar zircons indicate a younger age of 4.51 Gyrs for lunar crustal formation [51], which is significantly older than ages from ferroan anorthosites. This age, which is closer to Moon-formation ages of ~ 60 Myr from Hf-W [47], may instead simply represent the time of zircon formation in the initially rapidly cooling lunar magma ocean [52]. Modelling by Meyer et al. [36] suggests that prolonged cooling of the crust due to tidal heating could explain the late ages determined for the lunar anorthosites relative to the much shorter expected cooling times [e.g. 33]. One significant observation that cannot readily be explained by lunar serial magmatism, and therefore requires a deep magma ocean, is the apparent ubiquity of an orthopyroxene+olivine melting source region for Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 5 the picritic glasses between ~250 and ~500 km depth on the lunar nearside (data summary in [33], Figure 6). This thick deep layer of uniform mineralogy has to have been created by a deep, fractionating magma ocean: Serial diapirs will not leave behind a uniform cumulate pile, and the heterogeneities from between the putative melting regions would be enriched and therefore melt at lower temperatures later, producing melt products different from the picritic glasses, and not sampled on the Moon. Further, the lunar crust's thickness is smoothly varying from the nearside to the far side, excepting the effects of large impacts. To produce a smoothly varying crustal thickness via serial magmatism, the wavelength of the diapirs must not be more than a few multiples of the crustal thickness, or relaxation of the rapidly-cooling and high-viscosity anorthosites would not produce a smoothly varying crustal thickness. Such ubiquity of melting around the Moon must be virtually indistinguishable from a global magma ocean. Many aspects of the lunar magma ocean remain to be investigated, including the depth of the magma ocean, partial equilibrium vs fully fractional crystallization [30,33], the cooling times of the crust and the possible formation of a crustal dichotomy between near and far-side of the Moon [53, 54]. While many details of the chronology of lunar geology remain to be explained, the lunar magma ocean model is very successful in producing many of the observed properties of the Moon's internal structure and surface composition. Martian crust and clay formation An early Martian magma ocean is supported by measurements of short-lived radioactive isotopes that indicate early differentiation of Mars and generation of enriched and depleted mantle reservoirs [9, 55-57]. Young core formation ages for Mars (>~4-10 Myrs) [58] are further argument for a magma ocean because short-lived radioactive isotopes such as 26Al would still have been present to provide additional heat and core segregation requires at least partial melting of the silicate mantle. However, it remains uncertain how deep the magma ocean on Mars would have been. Physical models of the accretion and differentiation of Mars have attempted to determine the degree of melting with variable results. Models using impact heating and cooling but no other heat source find only partial melting of the near surface and a cold interior [59]. A multiphase model including radioactive and gravitational heating found that core formation may be a catastrophic, early event that can lead to additional heating of Mars-sized objects, although full silicate melting is not required [60]. The blanketing effect of a hybrid proto-atmosphere (both outgassed and nebular components) could also help to sustain a global magma ocean throughout accretion, depending on the accretion rate of proto-Mars Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 6 [61]. No model including all of the physical processes controlling the heating and cooling of proto-Mars (impact heating & cooling, radioactive decay, atmospheric blanketing, gravitational segregation, thermal convection, etc.) exist, and the physical partitioning of energy of those processes remains largely unknown, so the depth of the martian magma ocean remains uncertain. The magma ocean stage may have produced silicate reservoirs enriched and depleted in incompatible elements during fractional crystallization, which remain today due to incomplete mantle mixing. The ages of these reservoirs as measured with short-lived radioactive isotope systems have been used to infer the duration of the magma ocean stage and timing of crust formation, although interpretations within the community can vary. Measurements of Sm-Nd isotope systematics in shergottites by [62] suggest that the magma ocean stage on Mars lasted for ~100 Myrs, with a depleted reservoir forming by 4.535 Gyr and an enriched reservoir, plausibly either the crust of late stage magma ocean liquids, forming by 4.457 Myrs. Lead-lead ages of zircons in the polymict breccia NWA 7034/7355, which formed through melting of primary crust, give maximum crustal formation times of 4.428 Gyr [63]. Whole rock Sm-Nd ages of the same meteorite give similar ages of 4.42 - 4.46 Gyr [64]. Co-existing variations of ε182W and ε142Nd have been attributed to multiple episodes of silicate differentiation [9]. These authors find formation times of the depleted reservoir of ~25 Myrs, with ongoing formation of the enriched reservoir (thought to be the crust), extending to at least 40 Myrs after Solar System formation. This is ~60 Myrs younger than [62] and ~100 Myrs younger than [63, 64] but is more consistent with results from martian crust formation models [65]. In comparison, magma ocean thermal models predict crystallization timescales < 5 Myr for Mars [66, 67]. Additional analyses of Sm-Nd isotope systematics in shergottites and nahklites found a silicate differentiation time of 4504 Myr (~60 Myrs after Solar System formation) [68]. Given the discrepancy with magma ocean thermal models [66, 67], these authors suggest that this age could be explained by a giant impact and heterogeneous mixing of the martian mantle, rather than a global silicate differentiation event. However, recent high-precision isotopic work on zircons by [69] shows that the Martian magma ocean was solidified in less than 10 Myr after planetary formation, a result that indicates that a solid Mars existed within 20 Myr of CAIs. This result supports the rapid solidification of the Martian magma ocean and indicates that later reservoir disruptions were likely due to giant impacts and remixing. Elkins-Tanton et al. [65] modelled early crust formation on Mars at 30-50 Myrs after accretion arising during cumulate overturn by melting of the hot cumulates rising into the upper mantle. Measurements of potentially ancient crust in crater central peaks find primarily dunite and pyroxenite-dominated lithologies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 7 Compositional variations are suggestive of high degrees of fractional crystallization in a slowly cooling magma body, potentially generated by the overturn of the mantle following magma ocean solidification [70]. However, [71] find that stagnant lid convection models beginning from a thermal and density state derived from fractional crystallization cannot reproduce the later long-term thermal evolution of the planet (e.g. 1-2 long-lived mantle plumes). Therefore, more work is still needed in understanding the depth and longevity of the martian magma ocean, and the post-overturn thermal state. Clays are relatively common on the surface of Mars [72], suggesting the widespread presence of water on the surface (or near-surface) throughout the Noachian. Their presence has been used to try to constrain the climate history of early Mars, with models ranging from 'warm and wet' to 'cold and transiently wet' [73,74]. However, magma ocean models provide another possible source for clay minerals. Magma ocean outgassing would result in a thick atmosphere, of which a large or primary component, is water vapor [e.g. 66]. Primitive clays found on the surface of Mars could have formed through rapid reaction of a supercritical steam atmosphere or hot early ocean during the late magma ocean stage with the earliest magma ocean crust [75]. Although this clay layer would later be buried by new crust [66], this model may account for the presence of a thick clay layer at large depths within the Martian crust observed in crater central peaks [76] and the abundance of clay minerals within the regolith. The clay formation model assumes the long-term stability of the crust against the overturn, which should be further investigated. Early clays would likely have lower D/H ratios, since they would have formed before significant water escape from the planet, which provides a testable prediction of the primordial clay model. Chemical Heterogeneities in the Earth's Lower Mantle Seismic studies have long noted large scale heterogeneities in the lower mantle from variations in seismic velocities [77,78]. Both seismically fast and slow regions have been identified. While the seismically fast regions seem to be associated with regions of subduction, the seismically slow regions --called large low shear velocity provinces, or LLSVPs -- are found in regions associated with hot spot volcanism [79,80]. Seismic tomography suggests that the LLSVPs are associated with chemical heterogeneity in the lower mantle, and that these regions have higher densities than the surrounding lower mantle [81,82]. Within the LLSVPs are small (5-40 km thick) regions of even lower seismic velocity (ultralow-velocity zones, ULVZs), that have been associated with partial melting of silicates directly above the core or with significant compositional differences [83 -86]. Geodynamics simulations suggest that the LLSVPs could have been stable throughout Earth's history Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 8 if they are higher in density and/or viscosity than the surrounding lower mantle [87-89], suggesting a potential primordial origin. Chemical heterogeneities within the mantle suggest the existence of a small enriched mantle reservoir in the deep mantle [43, 90]. This suggestion is based on the Earth's 142Nd/144Nd ratio, which is higher than measured in chondrites and suggests that an early silicate differentiation event occurred in the first 160 Myrs [91]. Other recent measurements [92] suggest that the Earth has the same 142Nd/144Nd ratio as enstatite chondrites, obviating the need for an enriched reservoir. Other arguments in favour of a primordial chemical reservoir in the mantle come from noble gases. Mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORBs) and ocean island basalts (OIBs) appear to tap different chemical reservoirs, with the MORB source being depleted in primordial noble gas components and the OIB source being enriched and potentially undegassed [93-97]. Fractional crystallization of a magma ocean produces an unstable density stratification due to the enrichment of Fe in late stage melts [1, 66, 98-100]. These models predict mantle overturn following the crystallization of the magma ocean, with the final iron-rich residues sinking to the core mantle boundary of the planet. Since they are denser than the overlying mantle, these overturned cumulates might be stable at the CMB on long time scales [e.g. 101], so models suggest that these could be responsible for the modern day LLSVPs [102]. Alternative primordial origins for the LLSVPs have been suggested, including a primary basal magma ocean [103], partial melting of the Archaean mantle and sinking of dense, Fe-rich melts [104], or subduction of early crust enriched with late delivered chondritic material [94105 A primary basal magma ocean is produced if the liquidus and the magma ocean adiabat first intersect in the middle of the mantle, with crystallization proceeding towards the surface rapidly, and more slowly towards the core. The basalt melt would represent an un-depleted primordial chemical reservoir, which could generate denser crystallization products as Fe becomes enriched in the melt [103]. Zhang et al. [106] alter the basal magma ocean model to suggest that the higher density of the LLSVPs is due to the trapping of Fe-Ni-S metallic liquids within the basal magma ocean cumulates. However, recent analysis of mantle melting curve [107 ] suggests the mantle liquidus should increase smoothly from surface to core-mantle boundary (CMB). If this is verified by further experiments, magma ocean crystallization would initiate at the CMB, and a primary basal magma ocean could likely be ruled out. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 9 Figure 1 Oxidation state of Earth's mantle through geologic time from redox proxy measurements. See text for source details. The two data points at ~ 0 Myrs are values for present day MORBs. We plot historical oxygen fugacity relative to the fayalite-magnetite-quartz buffer (FMQ). At 1200C and 1 GPa, NNO = FMQ + 0.7, IW = FMQ -- 3.69. Mantle oxidation state The oxidation state of the upper mantle of the present-day Earth is near the FMQ buffer [108]. Various estimates are of the mantle redox state through time are shown in Figure 1. Measurements of ancient redox proxies, Cr and V whole-rock abundances in ancient volcanics and the composition of Cr-rich spinels in ancient volcanics indicate that the oxygen fugacity of the mantle has been at or above the present-day value (±0.5 log fO2) since ~3900 Ma [109]. Canil [110] used partitioning of V between komatiitic liquids and olivine in 6 well-characterized komatiite flows to estimate Archaean fO2 and found values from ΔNNO -2 to +1. Li & Lee [111] looked at V/Sc ratios in basalts and find that Archaean basalts have V/Sc ratios only slightly smaller than Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 10 that of modern MORBS, indicating only a minor decrease of ~0.3 log fO2 units relative to FMQ. Recent measurements of 3.5 -- 2.4 Ga komatiites used V partitioning behaviour to constrain the fO2 of the mantle, and found a range of -0.11 to +0.43 FMQ, consistent with a relatively constant mantle fO2 through time [112]. Aulbach & Stagno [113] used V/Sc ratios in metamorphosed mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORBs) and picrites from 3.0 -- 0.55 Ga as redox proxies and found a slightly larger decrease in mantle fO2, down to -1.5 FMQ, during the Archean. They note that the increase of the mantle fO2 to the present-day value appears coincident with the atmospheric Great Oxidation Event (GOE). Analysis of Ce abundances in detrital Hadean-aged Jack Hills zircons suggest oxygen fugacities consistent with the present day back to 4.3 Ga [114]. Taken together, the present measurements are consistent with a constant oxygen fugacity within the mantle over the entire history of the Earth. However, models of core formation, which occurs within the magma ocean of the forming Earth, require much more reducing conditions in order to match trace element partitioning behaviour between the mantle and the core [e.g. 115-117]. Therefore, oxidation of the mantle to the present-day state had to occur contemporaneously with core formation or shortly thereafter and operate on a relatively short timescale. Several models have been proposed to increase the oxidation state of the mantle through the post-production of Fe3+ in the mantle. These include gradual H escape from accreted water [118], and the production of Fe3+ through disproportionation of Fe2+ in the lower mantle by crystallization of bridgmanite [119,120]. Trace element partitioning models [e.g. 117, 121] match the present-day mantle FeO abundance by allowing the composition of accreting material to become more oxidized through time (IW-5 to IW-2), but these models fail to predict Fe3+/ΣFe, which governs present-day oxidation state. These models typically end with a mantle at IW-2, about 5 log fO2 units below the present day. We propose an alternative mechanism: that disproportionation of Fe2+ occurs in the silicate melt phase in the magma ocean during equilibration with the core forming metal delivered by accreting impactors, rather than during crystallization. This allows immediate separation of the metallic liquid, avoiding the remixing problem of [119,120]. The equilibrium amongst the different Fe valence states will be given by the reaction 3FeO(melt) -> 2FeO1.5(melt) + Fe (liquid metal). The metal will sink through the magma ocean to join the core, leaving the oxidized mantle material behind, without requiring complicated scenarios of melting and recrystallizing of bridgmanite that would be difficult to quantify. To reproduce the present day upper mantle, metal-silicate equilibration in the melt at high pressures must produce Fe3+/ΣFe ~ 0.01 -- 0.05 [108]. As in [122], we assume that equilibrium will be controlled at the level of metal-silicate equilibration and the magma ocean Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 11 Figure 2 Fe3+/ΣFe in the magma ocean produced by equilibration of liquid silicate and core-forming metal as a function of pressure along the mantle liquidus of [123]. See Table 1 for thermodynamic data sources. The grey shaded region highlights the Fe3+/ΣFe values in the Earth's present day upper mantle [108]. composition would be rapidly homogenized by convection. In Figure 2, we show the amount of Fe3+ produced through this reaction as a function of temperature along the mantle liquidus [123], using different data sets for partial molar volumes of the molten iron oxides [124, 125]. The low-pressure model data [124, 126] was measured at 1 bar, whereas for the higher-pressure model, we use data from new measurements of the Fe3+/ΣFe ratio in high pressure melts [125] of up to 7 GPa to refit the partial molar volume of the Fe3+ oxide. We use the equation of state of liquid Fe metal from [127] for all calculations and include partitioning of oxygen and silicon into the metal phase using the partitioning model of [128]. The thermodynamic data used for these calculations are given in Table 1. We calculate the Fe3+/ΣFe ratio as a function of pressure up to 50 GPa, which is close to average conditions of core formation determined for the Earth from trace element partitioning studies [117,121]. The updated equation of state for the liquid iron oxide from [125] predicts much larger Fe3+ abundances are produced at high pressures than the 1 bar data of [124] do. This is consistent with new, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 12 Table 1. Fit parameters used to calculate the Fe3+/ΣFe ratio as a function of pressure (see Figure 2). We refit the data of [125] to a Murnaghan equation of state for FeO1.5 (liq), while taking values from [124] and [126] for FeO(liq). For both models, we take the standard Gibbs energy of formation of the liquid oxides from [148] and calculate activity coefficients for the liquid oxides from [149]. For both models, we take a value of κ' = 4 for both oxides. Low P model Reference High P model Reference 𝑉 FeO (cm3/mole) 𝑉 FeO1.5 (cm3/mole) 𝜅𝐹𝑒𝑂(GPa) 𝜅𝐹𝑒𝑂1.5 (GPa) 13.65 21.065 30.33 16.6 [124] [124] [126] [126] 13.65 18.9 30.33 10.8 [124] Fit to [125] [126] Fit to [125] unpublished measurements of Fe3+/ΣFe in silicate melts from [129], which go up to pressures of ~25 GPa. The stabilization of Fe3+ in the melt phase at high pressure was predicted by [122], partially on the basis of the stability of Fe3+ in the crystalline phase at high pressures. As Fig. 2 shows, the equilibration of the different Fe valences at high pressure during the separation of core forming metal can easily produce the observed present day Fe3+ abundances in the Earth's upper mantle, shown by the grey shaded region. Therefore, no additional oxidation mechanisms are required to produce the present-day oxidation state, which implies that there has been limited oxidation of the Earth's upper mantle over geologic time. The calculations with the new data also suggest that the mantles of larger planets should in general be more oxidized than smaller planets once the metallic phase has separated, given that more Fe3+ is produced at higher pressures. This is corroborated by the low initial oxygen fugacity of the depleted martian mantle (~IW) [130], in comparison to the Earth's much higher oxygen fugacity. This has significant implications for the compositions of outgassed atmospheres we should expect on rocky exoplanets of different sizes. Magma oceans set the initial conditions for planetary tectonics Density stratification and magma ocean overturn Models of fractional crystallization of magma oceans result in unstable density structures due to the enrichment of late-stage melts in iron. These crystallization models predict whole-mantle overturn at the end of magma ocean crystallization, which results in a stably stratified density structure in the earliest solid mantle. This stable stratification is predicted to inhibit the onset of whole mantle convection, which may result Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 13 in an early stagnant lid tectonic regime on rocky planets [131, 132]. Recent models [133, 134] investigate the possibility of solid state convection beginning within the cumulate pile before the magma ocean has fully crystallized. Ballmer et al. [133] investigate incremental overturns within the solidifying cumulate pile using 2D numerical convection simulations and find that the majority of the mantle becomes well mixed. However, the final Fe-rich cumulate melt layer sinks to the CMB during the final overturn and remains stable as a highly dense layer for geologic time, which may be related to present day LLSVPs. Maurice et al. [134] similarly find that early onset of solid state convection while the magma ocean is still crystallizing will more efficiently homogenize the mantle than late stage overturn. However, their model fails to produce a LLSVP-like zone at the base of the mantle, and they instead prefer the basal magma ocean model of [103]. Tikoo & Elkins-Tanton [135] show that water within the late-stage melt may be expelled during mantle overturn, which would cause a large influx of water into the upper mantle. The large abundance of water in the early upper mantle would have allowed partial melting and lowered the viscosity, possibly allowing the early initiation of whole mantle convection. These models show that the mantle structure at the end of magma ocean phases remains uncertain. Tectonics after the magma ocean Recent work in scaling theory, steady-state simulations, and numerical evolutionary models show that the initial conditions of a solid-state mantle convection simulation can strongly influence the tectonic style of the simulated planet [136-138]. For instance, [136] demonstrate that tectonic models show a history dependence, i.e. the tectonic mode of a system is determined by its specific geologic and climatic history. Therefore, the density and thermal structure at the end of the magma ocean stage and following cumulate overturn sets the stage for the future tectonic evolution of the planet. As discussed in the previous section, a number of parameters remain poorly constrained by the end stage of magma ocean models, which influences the later tectonic models. The uncertain parameters include the mantle potential temperature and heat flux, the degree of mantle hydration, the thickness of the lithosphere, and the planetary climate. After discovering remnant magnetism on Mars, models predicting early plate tectonics were popular to explain rapid core cooling needed for magnetic field generation [139]. However, evidence of significant mantle heterogeneities on Mars suggest that significant convective mixing has not occurred. There is also little evidence of crustal recycling, indicating that Mars likely entered a stagnant or sluggish-lid phase following the magma ocean [71, 132], with heat fluxes out of the mantle dominated by a few long-lived mantle plumes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 14 It remains uncertain if plate tectonics on the Earth can initiate immediately after the magma ocean stage, or if the magma ocean is more likely to be followed by a stagnant-lid mode [140] or alternative tectonic regime (e.g. squishy lid [141], heat pipe model [142], etc.). Foley et al. [143] investigate onset of subduction during the Hadean using a model including grain-damage and find that a period of stagnant lid convection follows the initial mantle overturn, and that sluggish subduction can initiate relatively rapidly, due to damage build-up in the cold, dense lid material. Recent models have highlighted the potential role of triggers for initiating subduction, including external impacts that punch through the lithosphere and mantle plumes [144, 145]. Numerical models of core-formation suggest that metal diapirs may set up conduits to permit early onset of mantle plumes, either purely thermal or thermochemically driven [146, 147], which is particularly effective if the magma ocean is restricted to the upper mantle. These early mantle plumes could then play a role in triggering onset of early subduction. This discussion highlights the uncertainty in the tectonic state of planets following the magma ocean stage and the need for additional modelling. Magma ocean models must in future be more coupled with petrologic data from short-lived isotopic systems to help us better understand the early evolution of the terrestrial planets and the requirements for the onset of plate tectonics. Plate tectonics is often thought to be essential for the sustainability of life, and therefore such work has implications for the search for life on exoplanets as well as in our own Solar System. Additional Information Data Accessibility The dataset necessary to reproduce Figure 2 have been uploaded as part of the Supplementary Material. Sources of data shown in Figure 1 are given in the text. Authors' Contributions LS and LTET conceived of and designed the study, and LS drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript. Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Funding Statement The authors acknowledge funding from Arizona State University's Interplanetary Initiative, the NASA Psyche mission and the NSF CSEDI program. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 15 References [1] Solomatov, V 2000. Fluid dynamics of a terrestrial magma ocean. In:Origin of the Earth and Moon. Ed. Canup, RM, Righter, K. Univ. AZ Press, 323-338. [2] Elkins-Tanton, LT 2012. Magma oceans in the Inner Solar System. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 40, 113-39. [3] Miyamoto M, Fujii N, Takeda H. 1981. Ordinary chondrite parent body: an internal heating model. Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 12, 1145 -- 52. [4] Hevey, PJ, Sanders, IS 2006. A model for planetesimal meltdown by 26Al and its implications for meteorite parent bodies. Met. Planet. Sci. 41, 95-106. [5] Papanastassiou DA, Wasserburg GJ. 1969. Initial strontium isotopic abundances and the resolution of small time differences in the formation of planetary objects. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 5, 361 -- 76 [6] Neumann, W, Breuer, D, Spohn, T 2014. Differentiation of Vesta: implications for a shallow magma ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 395, 267-280. [7] Mandler, BE, Elkins-Tanton, LT 2013. The origin of eucrites, diogenites, and olivine diogenites: magma ocean crystallization and shallow magma chamber processes on Vesta. Met. Planet. Sci. 48, 2333-2349. [8] Scherstén A, Elliott T, Hawkesworth C, Russell S, Masarik J. 2006. Hf-W evidence for rapid differentiation of iron meteorite parent bodies. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 241, 530 -- 42 [9] Kruijer, TS, Kleine, T., Borg, LE, Brennecka, GA, Irving, AJ, Bischoff, A, Agee, CB. 2017. The early differentiation of Mars inferred from Hf-W chronometery. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 474, 345-354. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.047) [10] Matsui, T, Abe, Y 1986. Formation of a 'magma ocean' on the terrestrial planets due to the blanketing effect of an impact-induced atmosphere. Earth, Moon, Planets 34, 223-230. [11] Abe, Y 2011. Protoatmospheres and surface environment of protoplanets. Earth Moon Planets 108, 9-14. [12] Quintana, EV, Barclay, T, Borucki, WJ, Rowe, JF, Chambers, JE 2016. The frequency of giant impacts on Earth-like worlds. Astrophys. J. 821, 126. [13] Tonks, WB, Melosh, HJ 1993. Magma ocean formation due to giant impacts. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 5319-5333. [14] Smith, J.V., Anderson, A.T., Newton, R.C., Olsen, E.J., Wyllie, P.J., Crewe, A.V., Isaacson, M.S., Johnson, D., 1970. Petrologic history of the moon inferred from petrography, mineralogy and petrogenesis of Apollo 11 rocks. Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 897 -- 925. [15] Warren, PH. 1985. The magma ocean concept and lunar evolution. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 13, 201-240. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 16 [16] Wood, J.A., Dickey, J.S.J., Marvin, U.B., Powell, B.N., 1970. Lunar anorthosites and a geophysical model of the moon. Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf., 965 -- 988. [17] Donaldson-Hanna, KL, Cheek, LC, Pieters, CM, Mustard, JF, Greenhagen, BT, Thomas, IR, Bowles, NE. 2014. Global assessment of pure crystalline plagioclase across the Moon and implications for the evolution of the primary crust. J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 119, 1516-1545. [18] Ohtake, M and 37 others. 2009. The global distribution of pure anorthosite on the Moon. Nature, 461, 236- 240. [19] Korotev, RL, Jolliff, BL, Zeigler, RA, Gillis, JJ, Haskin, LA. 2003. Feldspathic lunar meteorites and their implications for compositional remote sensing of the lunar surface and the composition of the lunar crust. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 4895-4923. [20] Hawke, BR, Peterson CA, Blewett, DT, Bussey, DBJ, Lucey, PG, Taylor, GJ, Spudis, PD 2003. Distribution and modes of occurrence of lunar anorthosite. J. Geophys. Res Planets 108, 5050. (10.1029/2002JE0018900) [21] Besserer, J, Nimmo, F, Wieczorek, MA, Weber, RC, Kiefer, WS, McGovern, PJ, Andrews-Hanna, JC, Smith, DE, Zuber, MT. 2014. GRAIL gravity constraints on the vertical and lateral density structure of the lunar crust. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 5771-5777. [22] Haskin, LA, Lindstrom, MM, Salpas, PA, Lindstrom, D, 1981. On compositional variations among lunar anorthosites. Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 12, 41 -- 66. [23] Morse, SA, 1982. Adcumulus growth of anorthosite at the base of the lunar crust. Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 13, A10 -- A18. [24] Ryder, G, 1982. Lunar anorthosite 60025, the pertrogenesis of lunar anorthosites, and the bulk composition of the Moon. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 46, 1591 -- 1601. [25] Rai, N, van Westrenen, W. 2014. Lunar core formation: new constraints from metal-silicate partitioning of siderophile elements. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 388, 343-352. [26] Longhi, J, 1980. A model of early lunar differentiation. Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 289 -- 315. [27] Longhi, J, 2003. A new view of lunar ferroan anorthosites: postmagma ocean petrogenesis. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2-1 -- 2-15. [28] Longhi, J, 2006. Petrogenesis of picritic mare magmas: Constraints on the extent of early lunar differentiation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 5919 -- 5934. [29] Taylor, SR, Jakes, P, 1974. The geochemical evolution of the Moon. Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 5, 1287 -- 1305. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 17 [30] Snyder, GA, Taylor, LA, Neal, CR, 1992. A chemical model for generating the sources of mare basalts: combined equilibrium and fractional crystallization of the lunar magmasphere. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 3809 -- 3823. [31] Longhi J, Durand SR, Walker D. 2010. The pattern of Ni and Co abundances in lunar olivines. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 784 -- 798. [32] Elardo, SM, Draper, DS, Shearer, CK, 2011. Lunar Magma Ocean crystallization revisited: Bulk composition, early cumulate mineralogy, and the source regions of the highlands Mg-suite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 3024 -- 3045 [33] Elkins-Tanton, LT, Burgess, S, Yin, QZ. 2011. The lunar magma ocean: reconciling the solidification process with lunar petrology and geochronology. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 304, 326-336. [34] Piskorz, D, Stevenson, DJ. 2014. The formation of pure anorthosite on the Moon. Icarus 239, 238-243. [35] Dygert, N, Lin, J-F, Marshall, EW, Kono, Y, Gardner, JE. 2017. A low viscosity lunar magma ocean forms a stratified anorthitic flotation crust with mafic poor and rich units. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 11282-11291. [36] Meyer J, Elkins-Tanton LT, Wisdom J. 2010. Coupled thermal-orbital evolution of the early Moon. Icarus 208, 1 -- 10 [37] Chen, EMA, Nimmo, F. 2013. Tidal dissipation in the lunar magma ocean and its effect on the early evolution of the Earth-Moon system. Icarus 275, 132-142. [38] Lin, Y, Tronche, EJ, Steenstra, ES, van Westrenen, W. 2016. Evidence for an early wet Moon from experimental crystallization of the lunar magma ocean. Nat. Geosci. 10, 14-18. [39] Lin, Y, Tronche, EJ, Steenstra, ES, van Westrenen, W. 2017. Experimental constraints on the solidification of a nominally dry lunar magma ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 471, 104-116. [40] Hui, H, Peslier, AH, Zhang, Y, Neal, CR. 2013. Water in lunar anorthosites and evidence for a wet early Moon. Nat. Geosci. 6, 177-180. (DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1735) [41] Borg, LE, Norman, M, Nyquist, LE, Bogard, D, Snyder, GA, Taylor, L, Lindstrom, M. 1999. Isotopic studies of ferroan anorthosite 62236: a young lunar crustal rock from a light rare-earth-element-depleted source. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 63, 2679 -- 2691. [42] Borg, LE, Shearer, CK, Nyquist, LE, Norman, M, 2002. Isotopic constraints on the origin of lunar ferroan anorthosites. Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 33, 1396. [43] Boyet, M., Carlson, RW. 2005. 142Nd evidence for early (>4.53 Ga) global differentiation of the silicate Earth. Science 309, 576-581. (DOI: 10.1126/science.1113634) Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 18 [44] Carlson RW, Lugmair GW 1988. The age of ferroan anorthosite 60025: oldest crust on a young Moon? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 90, 119 -- 130. [45] Nyquist LE, Wiesmann H, Bansal B, Shih C Y, Keith JE, Harper CL. 1995. 146Sm -- 142Nd formation interval for the lunar mantle. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59, 2817 -- 2837. [46] Nyquist, LE, Shih, C-Y, Reese, YD, Park, J, Bogard, D, Garrison, D, Yamaguchi, A. 2010. Lunar crustal history recorded in lunar anorthosites. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 41, 1383. [47] Kleine, T, Touboul, M, Bourdon, B, Nimmo, F, Mezger, K, Palme, H, Jacobsen, SB, Yin, Q-Z, Halliday, A. 2009. Hf-W chronology of the accretion and early evolution of asteroids and terrestrial planets. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 5150-5188. [48] Borg, LE, Connelly, J, Boyet, M, Carlson, R, 2011. The age of lunar ferroan anorthosite 60025 with implications for the interpretation of lunar chronology and the magma ocean model. Proc. Lunar and Planet. Sci. Conf., 42, 1608. [49] Boyet, M, Carlson, RW, Borg, LE, Horan, M. 2015. Sm-Nd systematics of lunar ferroan anorthositic suite rocks: Constraints on lunar crust formation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 148, 203-218. [50] Snape, JF, Nemchin, AA, Bellucci, JJ, Whitehouse, MJ, Tartèse, R, Barnes, JJ, Anand, M, Crawford, IA, Joy, KH. 2016. Lunar basalt chronology, mantle differentiation and implications for determining the age of the Moon. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 451, 149-158. [51] Barboni, M, Boehnke, P, Keller, B, Kohl, IE, Schoene, B, Young, ED, McKeegan, KD. 2017. Early formation of the Moon 4.51 billion years ago. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602365. [52] Morbidelli, A, Nesvorny, D, Laurenz, V, Marchi, S, Rubie, DC, Elkins-Tanton, L, Wieczorek, M, Jacobson, S. 2018. The timeline of the lunar bombardment: revisited. Icarus 305, 262-276. [53] Hartung, JB. 1979. On the Global Asymmetry of the Lunar Crust Thickness. LPI Contribution 394, 45. [54] Pernet-Fisher, J, Joy, K. 2016. The lunar highlands: old crust, new ideas. Astron. Geo. 57, 1.26-1.30. [55] Blichert-Toft, J, Gleason, JD, Télouk, P, Albarède, F. 1999. The Lu-Hf isotope geochemistry of shergottites and the evolution of the Martian mantle-crust system. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 173, 25-39. [56] Borg, LE, Connelly, JN, Nyquist, LE, Shih, C-Y, Wiesmann, H, Reese, Y. 1999. The age of the carbonates in martian meteorite ALH84001. Science 286, 90-94. [57] Bouvier, LC, and 14 others. 2018. Evidence for extremely rapid magma ocean crystallization and crust formation on Mars. Nature, in press. [58] Dauphas, N. & Pourmand, A. 2011. Hf -- W -- Th evidence for rapid growth of Mars and its status as a planetary embryo. Nature 473, 489 -- 492. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 19 [59] Senshu, H, Kuramoto, K, Matsui, T. 2002. Thermal evolution of a growing Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 5118. Doi:10.1029/2001JE001819. [60] Ricard, Y, Sramek, O, Dubuffet, F. 2009. A multi-phase model of runaway core-mantle segregation in planetary embryos. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 284, 144-150. [61] Saito, H, Kuramoto, K. 2017. Formation of a hybrid-type proto-atmosphere on Mars accreting in the solar nebula. Month. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 475, 1247-1287. [62] Debaille, V, Brandon, AD, Yin, QZ, Jacobsen, B. 2007. Coupled 142Nd/143Nd evidence for a protracted magma ocean in Mars. Nature 450, 525-528. Doi:10.1038/nature06317. [63] Humayun, M, et al. 2013. Origin and age of the earliest Martian crust from meteorite NWA 7533. Nature 503, 513 -- 516. doi:10.1038/nature12764 [64] Nyquist, LE, Shih, CY, McCubbin, FM, Santos, AR, Shearer, CK, Peng, ZX, Burger, PV, Agee, CB. 2016. Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd isotopic and REE studies of igneous components in the bulk matrix domain of Martian breccia Northwest Africa 7034. Met. Planet. Sci. 51, 483-498. [65] Elkins-Tanton, LT, Hess, PC, Parmentier, EM. 2005. Possible formation of ancient crust on Mars through magma ocean processes. J. Geophys. Res. 110, E12S01. (doi:10.1029/2005JE002480) [66] Elkins-Tanton, LT. 2008. Linked magma ocean solidification and atmospheric growth for Earth and Mars. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 271, 181-191. [67] Lebrun, T., Massol, H, Chassefiere, E, Davaille, A, Marcq, E, Sarda, P, Leblanc, F, Brandeis, G. 2013. Thermal evolution of an early magma ocean in interaction with the atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res.: Planets 118, 1155-1176. [68] Borg, LE, Brennecka, GA, Symes, SJK. 2016. Accretion timescale and impact history of Mars deduced from the isotopic systematics of martian meteorites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 175, 150-167. [69] Bouvier, LC, et al. 2018. Evidence for extremely rapid magma ocean crystallization and crust formation on Mars. Nature, 558, 586-589. [70] Skok, JR, Mustard, JF, Tornabene, LL, Pan, C, Rogers, D, Murchie, SL. 2012. A spectroscopic analysis of Martian crater central peaks: formation of the ancient crust. J. Geophys. Res. 117, E00J18. Doi: 10.1029/2012JE004148 [71] Plesa, AC, Tosi, N, Breuer, D 2014. Can a fractionally crystallized magma ocean explain the thermo- chemical evolution of Mars? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 403, 225-235. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 20 [72] Ehlmann, BL, Edwards, CS. 2014. Mineralogy of the martian surface. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 42, 291- 315. [73] Ramirez, R. 2017. A warmer and wetter solution for early Mars and the challenges with transient warming. Icarus 297, 71-82. [74] Wordsworth, R, Kalugina, Y, Lokshtanov, S, Vigasin, A, Ehlmann, B, Head, J, Sanders, C, Wang, H. 2013. Transient reducing greenhouse warming on early Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 665-671. [75] Cannon, KM, Parman, SW, Mustard, JF. 2017. Primordial clays on Mars formed beneath a steam supercritical atmosphere. Nature 552, 88-91. (doi:10.1038/nature24657) [76] Sun, VZ, Milliken, RE. 2015. Ancient and recent clay formation on Mars as revealed from a global survey of hydrous minerals in crater central peaks. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 120, 2293-2332. [77] Dziewonski, AM, Hager, BH, O'Connell, RJ. 1977. Large-scale heterogeneities in the lower mantle. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 239 -- 55 [78] Su, W-J, Woodward, RL, Dziewonski, AM, 1994.Degree 12 model of shear velocity heterogeneity in the mantle. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 6945 -- 6980. [79] Garnero EJ, McNamara AK. 2008. Structure and dynamics of Earth's lower mantle. Science 320, 626 -- 28 [80] Thorne MS, Garnero EJ. 2004. Inferences on ultralow-velocity zone structure from a global analysis of SPdKS waves. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B08301 [81] Ishii, M, Tromp, J. 1999. Constraining large-scale mantle heterogeneity using mantle and inner-core sensitive normal modes. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 146, 113-124. [82] Trampert, J, Deschamps, F, Resovsky, J, Yuen, D. 2004. Probabilistic tomography maps chemical heterogeneities throughout the lower mantle. Science 306, 853-856 [83] Williams Q, Garnero EJ. 1996. Seismic evidence for partial melt at the base of Earth's mantle. Science 273, 1528 -- 30 [84] Lay, T, Garnero, EJ, Williams, Q. 2004. Partial melting in a thermo-chemical boundary layer at the base of the mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 146, 441 -- 67 [85] Rost, S, Garnero, EJ, Williams, Q, Manga, M. 2005. Seismological constraints on a possible plume root at the core-mantle boundary. Nature 435, 666 -- 69 [86] McNamara AK, Garnero EJ, Rost S. 2010. Tracking deep mantle reservoirs with ultra-low velocity zones. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 299, 1 -- 9 [87] Jellinek, AM, Manga, M 2002. The influence of a chemical boundary layer on the fixity, spacing and lifetime of mantle plumes. Nature 418, 760-763. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 21 [88] McNamara, AK, Zhong, S. 2005. Thermochemical structures beneath Africa and the Pacific ocean. Nature 437, 1136-1139. [89] Becker, TW, Kellogg, JB, O'Connell, R. 1999. Thermal constraints on the survival of primitive blobs in the lower mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 171, 351-365. [90] Rizo, H, Walker, RJ, Carlson, RW, Touboul, M, Horan, MF, Puchtel, IS, Boyet, M, Rosing, MT. 2016. Early Earth differentiation investigated through 142Nd, 182W, and highly siderophile element abundances in samples from Isua, Greenland. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 175, 319-336. [91] Morino, P, Caro, G, Reisberg, L, Schumacher, A. 2017. Chemical stratification in the post-magma ocean Earth inferred from coupled 146,147Sm-142,143Nd systematics in ultramafic rocks of the Saglek block (3.25-3.9 Ga; northern Labrador, Canada). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 463, 136-150. [92] Bouvier, A, Boyet, M 2016. Primitive Solar System materials and Earth share a common initial 142Nd abundance. Nature 537, 399-402. (doi:10.1038/nature19351) [93] Kurz, MD, Jenkins, WJ, Hart, SR. 1982. Helium isotopic systematics of oceanic islands and mantle heterogeneity. Nature 297, 43-47. [94] Kellogg, LH, Wasserburg, GJ 1990. The role of plumes in mantle helium fluxes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 99, 276-289. [95] Honda, R, Mizutani, H, Yamamoto, T. 1993. Numerical simulation of Earth's core formation. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 2075-2089. [96] Graham, DW 2002. Noble gas isotope geochemistry of midocean ridge and ocean island basalts: characterization of mantle source reservoirs. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 47, 247 -- 317. [97] Tucker, JM, Mukhopadhyay, S. 2014. Evidence for multiple magma ocean outgassing and atmospheric loss episodes from mantle noble gases. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 393, 254-265. [98] Hess, P, Parmentier, E, 1995. A model for the thermal and chemical evolution of the Moon's interior: implications for the onset of mare volcanism. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 134, 501 -- 514. [99] Ringwood, AE, Kesson, SE, 1976. A dynamic model for mare basalt petrogenesis. Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 7, 1697 -- 1722. [100] Spera, FJ, 1992. Lunar magma transport phenomena. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 56,2253 -- 2265. [101] Debaille, V, Brandon, AD, O'Neill, C, Yin, QZ, Jacobsen, B. 2009. Early martian mantle overturn inferred from isotopic composition of nakhlite meteorites. Nat. Geosci. 2, 548-552. Doi:10.1038/ngeo579 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 22 [102] Brown, SM, Elkins-Tanton, ET, Walker, RJ. 2014. Effects of magma ocean crystallization and overturn on the development of 142Nd and 182W isotopic heterogeneities in the primordial mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 408, 319-330. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.10.025) [103] Labrosse, S, Hernlund, JW, Coltice, N. 2008. A crystallizing dense magma ocean at the base of the Earth's mantle. Nature 450, 866-869. (doi:10.1038/nature06355) [104] Lee, CA, Luffi, P, Höink, T, Li, J, Dasgupta, R, Hernlund, J. 2010 Upside-down differentiation and generation of a 'primordial' lower mantle. Nature 463, 930-933. (doi:10.1038/nature08824) [105] Tolstikhin, I, Hofmann, AW 2005. Early crust on top of the Earth's core. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 148, 109- 130. [106] Zhang, Z, Dorfman, SM, Labidi, J, Zhang, S, Li, M, Manga, M, Stixrude, L, McDonough, WF, Williams, Q. 2016. Primordial metallic melt in the deep mantle. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 3693-3699. (doi:10.1002/2016GL068560) [107] Andrault, D, Bolfan-Casanova, N, Bouhifd, MA, Boujibar, A, Garbarino, G, Manthilake, G, Mezouar, M, Monteux, J, Parisiades, P, Pesce, G. 2017. Toward a coherent model for the melting behaviour of the deep Earth's mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 265, 67-81. (doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2017.02.009) [108] Frost, DJ & McCammon, CA 2008. The redox state of Earth's mantle. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 389- 420. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124322 [109] Delano, JW 2001. Redox history of the Earth's interior since ~3900 Ma: implications for prebiotic molecules. Origins Life Evol. Biosphere 31, 311-341. [110] Canil, D 1997. Vanadium partitioning and the oxidation state of Archaean komatiite magmas. Nature, 389, 842-845. [111] Li, ZXA & Lee, CTA 2004. The constancy of upper mantle fO2 through time inferred from V/Sc ratios in basalts. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 228, 483-493. [112] Nicklas, RW, Puchtel, IS, Ash, RD 2018. Redox state of the Archean mantle: Evidence from V partitioning in 3.5-2.4 Ga komatiites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 222, 447-466. [113] Aulbach, S & Stagno, V 2016. Evidence for a reducing Archean ambient mantle and its effects on the carbon cycle. Geology 44, 751-754. [114] Trail, D, Watson, EB, Tailby, ND 2011.The oxidation state of Hadean magmas and implications for early Earth's atmosphere. Nature 480, 79-82. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 23 [115] Badro, J., Brodholt, JP, Piet, H, Siebert, J, Ryerson, FJ. 2015. Core formation and core composition from coupled geochemical and geophysical constraints. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 112, 12310-12314. Doi:10.1073/pnas.1505672112. [116] Rubie, DC, Frost, DJ, Mann, U, Asahara, Y, Nimmo, F, Tsuno, K, Kegler, P, Holzheid, A, Palme, H 2011. Heterogeneous accretion, composition and core-mantle differentiation of the Earth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 301, 31-42. [117] Rubie, DC, Jacobson, SA, Morbidelli, A, O'Brien, DP, Young, ED, de Vries, J, Nimmo, F, Palme, H, Frost, DJ 2015 Accretion and differentiation of the terrestrial planets with implications for the compositions of early- formed Solar System bodies and accretion of water. Icarus 248, 89-108. [118] Sharp, ZD, McCubbin, FM, Shearer, CK 2013. A hydrogen-based oxidation mechanism relevant to planetary formation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 380, 88-97. [119] Frost, DJ, Liebske, C, Langenhorst, F, McCammon, CA, Tronnes, RG, Rubie, DC 2004. Experimental evidence for the existence of iron-rich metal in the Earth's lower mantle. Nature 428, 409-412. [120] Wade, J, Wood, BJ 2005. Core formation and the oxidation state of the Earth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 236, 78-95. [121] Fischer, RA, Nakajima, Y, Campbell, AJ, Frost, DJ, Harries, D, Langenhorst, F, Miyajima, N, Pollock, K, Rubie, DC 2015. High pressure metal-silicate partitioning of Ni, Co, V, Cr, Si, and O. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 167, 177-194. [122] Hirschmann, M 2012. Magma ocean influence on early atmosphere mass and composition. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 341-344, 48-57. [123] Andrault, D, Bolfan-Casanova, N, Nigro, GL, Bouhifd, MA, Garbarino, G, Mezouar, M. 2011. Solidus and liquidus profiles of chondritic mantle: implication for melting of the Earth across its history. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 304, 251-259. [124] Lange, RA, Carmichael, ISE 1989. Ferric-ferrous equilibria in Na2O-FeO-Fe2O3-SiO2 melts: effects of analytical techniques on derived partial molar volumes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53, 2195-2204. [125] Zhang, HL, Hirschmann, MM, Cottrell, E, Withers, AC 2017. Effect of pressure on Fe3+/ΣFe ratio in a mafic magma and consequences for magma ocean redox gradients. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 204, 83-103. [126] Kress, VC, Carmicheal, ISE. 1991. The compressibility of silicate liquids containing Fe2O3 and the effect of composition, temperature, oxygen fugacity and pressure on their redox states. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 108, 82- 92. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 24 [127] Komabayashi, T 2015. Thermodynamics of melting relations in the system Fe-FeO at high pressure: implications for oxygen in the Earth's core. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 119, 4164-4177. [128] Ricolleau, A, Fei, Y, Corgne, A, Siebert, J, Badro, J. 2011. Oxygen and silicon contents of Earth's core from high pressure metal-silicate partitioning experiments. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 310, 409-421. [129] Armstrong, K, Frost, DJ, McCammon, CA, Rubie, DC, Boffa Ballaran, T. 2017. The effect of pressure on iron speciation in silciate melts at a fixed oxygen fugacity: the possibility of a redox profile through a terrestrial magma ocean. Am. Geophys. Un. 2017, abstract MR54A-04. [130] Wadhwa, M. 2008. Redox conditions on small bodies, the Moon and Mars. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 68, 493- 510. [131] Zaranek, SE, Parmentier, EM 2004. The onset of convection in fluids with strongly temperature- dependent viscosity cooled from above with implications for planetary lithospheres. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 224, 371-386. [132] Scheinberg, A, Elkins-Taton, LT, Zhong, SJ. 2014. Timescale and morphology of Martian mantle overturn immediately following magma ocean solidification. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 119, 454-467. Doi:10.1002/2013JE004496 [133] Ballmer, MD, Lourenco, DL, Hirose, K, Caracas, R, Nomura, R. 2017. Reconciling magma-ocean crystallization models with the present-day structure of the Earth's mantle. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 18, 2785- 2806. (doi:10.1002/2017GC006917) [134] Maurice, M, Tosi, N, Samuel, H, Plesa, AC, Hüttig, C, Breuer, D. 2017. Onset of solid-state mantle convection and mixing during magma ocean solidification. J. Geophys. Res. 122, 577-598. (doi:10.1002/2016JE005250.) [135] Tikoo, SM, Elkins-Tanton, LT. 2016. The fate of water within Earth and super-Earths and implications for plate tectonics. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. A 375, 20150394. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0394) [136] Lenardic, A, Crowley, JW. 2012. On the notion of well-defined tectonic regimes for terrestrial planets in this solar system and others. Astrophys. J. 755, 132. [137] Weller, MB, Lenardic, A, O'Neill, C. 2015. The effects of internal heating and large scale climate variations on tectonic bi-stability in terrestrial planets. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 420, 85-94. [138] O'Neill, C, Lenardic, A, Weller, M, Moresi, L, Quenette, S, Zhang, S. 2016. A window for plate tectonics in terrestrial planet evolution? Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 255, 80-92. [139] Nimmo, F, Stevenson, DJ 2000. Influence of early plate tectonics on the thermal evolution and magnetic field of Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 11969-11979. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 25 [140] Debaille, V, O'Neill, C, Brandon, AD, Haenecour, P, Yin, QZ, Mattielli, N, Treiman, A. 2013. Stagnant-lid tectonics in early Earth revealed by 142Nd variations in late Archaen rocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 373, 83-92. Doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2013.04.016 [141] Lourenco, DL, Rozel, AB, Gerya, T, Tackley, PJ. 2018. Efficient cooling of rocky planet by intrusive magmatism. Nat. Geosci. 11, 322-327. [142] Moore, WB, Simon, JI, Webb, AAG. 2017. Heat-pipe planets. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 474, 13-19. [143] Foley, BJ, Bercovici, D, Elkins-Tanton, LT. 2014. Initiation of plate tectonics from post-magma ocean thermochemical convection. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119, 8538-8561. (doi:10.1002/2014JB011121) [144] O'Neill, C, Marchi, S, Zhang,S, Bootke, W. 2017. Impact-driven subduction on the Hadean Earth. Nat. Geosci. 10, 793-797. [145] Gerya, TV, Stern, RJ, Baes, M, Sobolev, SV, Whattam, SA. 2015. Plate tectonics on the Earth triggered by plume-induced subduction initiation. Nature 527, 221-225. [146] King, C, Olson, P. 2011. Heat partitioning in metal-silicate plumes during Earth differentiation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 304, 577-586. [147] Fleck, JR, Rains, CL, Weeraratne, DS, Nguyen, CT, Brand, DM, Klein, SM, McGehee, JM, Rincon, JM, Martinez, C, Olson, PL. 2018. Iron diapirs entrain silicates to the core and initiate thermochemical plumes. Nat. Comm. 9, 71. [125] Kowalski, M, Spencer, PJ 1995. Thermodynamic reevaluation of the Cr-O, Fe-O, and Ni-O systems: remodelling of the liquid, bcc, and fcc phases. Calphad 19, 229-243. [126] Matousek, J 2003. Thermodynamics of iron oxidation in metallurgical slags. J. Min. Metal Mater. Soc..64, 1314-1320. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.
1306.2654	1	1306	2013-06-11T20:41:03	Spatially-Resolved Millimeter-Wavelength Maps of Neptune	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present maps of Neptune in and near the CO (2-1) rotation line at 230.538 GHz. These data, taken with the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA) represent the first published spatially-resolved maps in the millimeter. At large (~5 GHz) offsets from the CO line center, the majority of the emission originates from depths of 1.1-4.7 bar. We observe a latitudinal gradient in the brightness temperature at these frequencies, increasing by 2-3 K from 40 degrees N to the south pole. This corresponds to a decrease in the gas opacity of about 30% near the south pole at altitudes below 1 bar, or a decrease of order a factor of 50 in the gas opacity at pressures greater than 4 bar. We look at three potential causes of the observed gradient: variations in the tropospheric methane abundance, variations in the H2S abundance, and deviations from equilibrium in the ortho/para ratio of hydrogen. At smaller offsets (0-213 MHz) from the center of the CO line, lower atmospheric pressures are probed, with contributions from mbar levels down to several bars. We find evidence of latitudinal variations at the 2-3% level in the CO line, which are consistent with the variations in zonal-mean temperature near the tropopause found by Conrath et al. (1998) and Orton et al. (2007).	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Accepted to Icarus: 17 May 2013 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 SPATIALLY-RESOLVED MILLIMETER-WAVELENGTH MAPS OF NEPTUNE S. H. Luszcz-Cook12, I. de Pater13, M. Wright 1 Accepted to Icarus: 17 May 2013 ABSTRACT We present maps of Neptune in and near the CO (2-1) rotation line at 230.538 GHz. These data, taken with the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA) represent the first published spatially-resolved maps in the millimeter. At large (∼ 5 GHz) offsets from the CO line center, the majority of the emission originates from depths of 1.1 -- 4.7 bar. We observe a latitudinal gradient in the brightness temperature at these frequencies, increasing by 2 -- 3 K from 40◦N to the south pole. This corresponds to a decrease in the gas opacity of about 30% near the south pole at altitudes below 1 bar, or a decrease of order a factor of 50 in the gas opacity at pressures greater than 4 bar. We look at three potential causes of the observed gradient: variations in the tropospheric methane abundance, variations in the H2S abundance, and deviations from equilibrium in the ortho/para ratio of hydrogen. At smaller offsets (0 -- 213 MHz) from the center of the CO line, lower atmospheric pressures are probed, with contributions from mbar levels down to several bars. We find evidence of latitudinal variations at the 2-3% level in the CO line, which are consistent with the variations in zonal-mean temperature near the tropopause found by Conrath et al. (1998) and Orton et al. (2007). NOTICE: this is the authors' version of a work that was accepted for publication in Icarus. Changes resulting from the publishing process may not be reflected in this document. 1. INTRODUCTION Neptune's millimeter continuum originates in the tro- posphere, from pressures of 1 -- 5 bar. While collision- induced absorption of H2 with hydrogen, helium and methane dominates the opacity at these wavelengths, several trace species also contribute, particularly H2S, PH3 and NH3. The abundances of these trace species have yet to be uniquely determined, though good fits to centimeter-wavelength disk-integrated spectra, which probe depths of several bars down to 10's of bars, are obtained using an H2S abundance that represents a 30 -- 50 times enrichment above the protosolar S/H value (de Pater et al. 1991; DeBoer and Steffes 1996) and a pro- tosolar abundance or less of nitrogen in NH3 (Romani et al. 1989; de Pater et al. 1991). Another trace atmospheric species, carbon monoxide (CO), produces strong rotational lines at (sub)millimeter wavelengths. CO is present in Neptune's upper atmo- sphere at a level several orders of magnitude greater than expected under thermochemical equilibrium conditions (Marten et al. 1991). Two major pathways have been identified for enriching Neptune's atmosphere in CO, and these pathways result in different vertical CO abundance profiles. The first of these is upward mixing of CO from warm, deep layers of the atmosphere where CO is ther- mochemically stable (Lodders and Fegley 1994); CO sup- plied in this fashion will be well-mixed throughout the upper atmosphere and therefore will exhibit a uniform 1 Astronomy Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 2 Astrophysics Department, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA; [email protected] 3 SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, 3584 CA Utrecht, and Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands vertical profile. Alternatively, CO may be produced in the stratosphere of the planet as a result of the infall of oxygen-bearing material; in this case, downward trans- port will act as a sink and the CO abundance will fall below observable levels in the troposphere, where the dif- fusion rate increases dramatically (Moses 1992). To differentiate between these scenarios, models of Neptune's disk-integrated vertical CO profile have been produced using observations of the CO (1-0) (Luszcz- Cook and de Pater 2013), (2-1) (Lellouch et al. 2005; Luszcz-Cook and de Pater 2013) and (3-2) (Hesman et al. 2007) rotation lines at high spectral resolution (1.25-4 MHz) over a wide (8-20 GHz) frequency range. As illus- trated in Fig. 1 for the CO (2-1) line at 230.538 GHz, such observations are necessary to characterize the full vertical CO profile, detecting emission from pressures be- low 0.1 mbar at line center, up to several bars in the far wings. From their respective studies, Lellouch et al. (2005) and Hesman et al. (2007) find substantial tropo- spheric CO abundances of 0.5±0.1 and 0.6±0.4 parts per million (ppm). The analysis of Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013), which favors a warmer temperature profile than Lellouch et al. (2005) and Hesman et al. (2007), produces a lower best-fit tropospheric CO abundance of 0.1+0.2−0.1 ppm. As first described by Prinn and Barshay (1977), the observed tropospheric CO mole fraction represents the equilibrium abundance at the CO 'quench level', which is defined as the depth at which the timescale for vertical mixing is equal to the timescale for chem- ical conversion of CO into CH4. The equilibrium CO mole fraction is directly proportional to the equilibrium abundance of H2O, and under the conditions of Nep- tune's deep atmosphere, nearly all the gas phase oxygen is contained in water. Therefore, the CO abundance of tropospheric CO acts as a probe of Neptune's global oxy- 2 S. H. Luszcz-Cook, I. de Pater, M. Wright Fig. 1. -- Contribution functions for the CO (2 -- 1) line, illustrating the altitudes contributing to the observed intensity for a selection of offsets from 0 to 5 GHz from line center. Contribution functions have been produced from the radiative transfer model, for disk center (selected to be where the viewing angle µ (the cosine of the emission angle) is greater than 0.9, shown left), and near the limb (µ < 0.45, right). The model was produced assuming a CO profile with 1.1 ppm CO in the stratosphere (at pressure less than 0.16 bar) and no CO in the troposphere. CO opacity is greatest near line center; and emission at this frequency comes from the highest altitudes in the atmosphere (black line). The cutoff in the CO abundance is responsible for the sharp decrease in the contribution functions near the tropopause. Neptune's thermal profile has been plotted for reference (grey, see Section 3 for more information). gen abundance. Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013) find that a tropospheric CO mole fraction of 0.1 ppm implies a global oxygen enrichment of at least 400, and likely more than 650 times the protosolar O/H value. Note, though, that the Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013) data are also consistent with 0.0 ppm of CO in the troposphere, in which case they do not constrain the global oxygen abun- dance. In addition to the CO abundance measured in the troposphere, Lellouch et al. (2005), Hesman et al. (2007), and Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013) all find that the CO line shape is best fit by a CO abundance profile that increases in the stratosphere, which suggests that infall must also contribute to Neptune's observed CO abundance. Based on the atmospheric CO/H2O ra- tio, Lellouch et al. (2005) proposed that a recent large cometary impact could be responsible for Neptune's ob- served stratospheric CO abundance; however, comets of the necessary size are expected to be exceedingly uncom- mon. Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013) find that a con- stant influx of (sub)kilometer-sized comets could supply the observed stratospheric abundance of CO. Spatially resolved maps of Neptune at centimeter wavelengths have been obtained by several authors (de Pater et al. 1991; Martin et al. 2006, 2008; Hofstadter et al. 2008). Martin et al. (2006, 2008) and Hofstadter et al. (2008) find a substantial (tens of K) increase in the 1.3-2 cm brightness temperature near the south pole. Such a temperature enhancement would result if dry air subsides at this location, which would cause a decrease in the atmospheric gas opacity so that warmer, deeper lay- ers of the planet are probed. This observation is therefore consistent with a global circulation pattern in which air rises at mid- southern and northern latitudes and sub- sides near the equator and south pole. Recently, Butler et al. (2012) presented maps at 1 cm obtained with the upgraded VLA, with a resolution of better than 0.1": they observe that Neptune's bright polar cap extends from the pole to 70◦S. They also see evidence for equa- torial brightening, which would be consistent with the circulation pattern outlined above. In this paper, we present the first spatially-resolved measurements of Nep- tune at millimeter wavelengths, originally reported by Luszcz-Cook et al. (2010). Our data set spans a range of frequencies, from the center of the CO (2-1) line at 230.538 GHz (1.3 mm) to a maximum offset of 6 GHz from line center, where continuum emission is detected. The motivation behind these observations was to look for latitudinal variations in the CO abundance, which would provide additional information about the pattern of CO infall/production. This was observed in the case of Jupiter after the impact of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 (SL9); Moreno et al. (2003) estimated that for SL9, lati- 0.00.20.40.60.81.0Contribution function10210010−210−410−6Pressure (bar)disk center050100150200250300Temperature (K)center5 MHz10 MHz20 MHz70 MHz200 MHz1 GHz5 GHzcenter5 MHz10 MHz20 MHz70 MHz200 MHz1 GHz5 GHz0.00.20.40.60.81.0Contribution function10210010−210−410−6Pressure (bar)limb050100150200250300Temperature (K)3 Fig. 2. -- Spectral coverage of our observations; for reference the model disk-integrated spectrum is shown in black. The short baseline D-array data windows are indicated in red. The long baseline B-array bands are shown in pink (prior to 2011) and cyan (2011). For each correlator setup, the narrow band is shown as a thicker line than the wide bands. As described in Section 2, our analysis focuses on the frequencies where we have the most data, which are those spanned by the B-array data prior to 2011 (pink). The plot on the right is zoomed in on line center. tudinal variations in the CO abundance would persist for roughly a decade. Furthermore, the CO abundance at a given latitude depends on the rate of vertical and merid- ional mixing, and could therefore act as a tracer of the large-scale circulation. The spectrum in the CO line is also affected by the temperature profile; therefore maps in the CO line will be affected by horizontal variations in temperature. In the 1.3 mm continuum, the intensity depends on the gas opacity at depths of 1.1-4.7 bar which may vary with latitude due to the large-scale circulation pattern. 2. OBSERVATIONS We observed Neptune with the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA), lo- cated in the Inyo Mountains of eastern California 4. CARMA consists of eight 3.5-meter antennas, nine 6- meter antennas and six 10-meter antennas; our obser- vations were performed with the 6- and 10-meter an- tennas only, for a total of 105 baselines and 725 m2 of collecting area. CARMA can be configured in 5 stan- dard patterns 'A -- E', with the 'A' configuration being the most extended and therefore producing the highest angular resolution; and the 'E' configuration being the most compact (lowest resolution). In order to spatially resolve Neptune's 2.2" disk yet still 'see' the object and have enough signal per synthesized beam, we observed in the 'B' configuration, which has baselines of 82-946 meters and a synthesized beam of approximately 0.35" at 230 GHz. Projected antenna separations ranged from 30 to 670 kλ. Observations were carried out over a total of 13 days: one test observing block, or 'track', was taken in De- cember 2008, followed by eight tracks in the winter of 2009-2010 and four in January 2011. Of these, two of the datasets from 2011 were of poor quality and were not included in the analysis. Each dataset consists of a 15- minute observation of the bright quasar 3C454.3 for pass- band calibration, followed by a series of observing cycles of 8 minutes on Neptune and 2 minutes (prior to 2011) or 3 minutes (in 2011) on a nearby quasar (2229-085 in December 2008 and January 2011; 3C446 in winter 2009- 2010) to be used for calibration of the atmospheric and instrumental gains 5. The weather conditions during the observations were generally fair, with root mean square (rms) path errors ranging from 100 to 325 µm on a 100- m baseline, and an average zenith optical depth of 0.18. The total time on source in the B-array configuration was 28 hours. To provide information at shorter base- lines, we combined our B-array data with 15 hours on source in the more compact D-array configuration from spring 2009; these data have projected antenna separa- tions of 5 -- 84 kλ and are described in Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013). Prior to upgrades in 2010, the CARMA correlator of- fered three dual bands, or spectral windows, with config- urable width of 500, 62, 31, 8 or 2 MHz. Each band could be placed independently anywhere within the 4 GHz IF bandwidth, and appears symmetrically in the upper and lower sidebands of the first local oscillator. For our B- array observations, we configured one correlator band to 62-MHz bandwidth and centered on the CO (2 -- 1) line at 230.538 GHz; the channel spacing in this 'narrow' band was 0.9766 MHz. The remaining two bands were con- figured to maximum (500 MHz) bandwidth and placed at offsets from line center; the channel spacing in each of these 'wide' bands was 31.25 MHz. The configuration of the correlator during our 2008-2010 B-array observa- tions is described in Table 1. Due to upgrades to the 4 CARMA is located at Cedar Flat, CA, at elevation 2200 m; latitude 37.3; longitude -118.1 5 phase calibrators were typically located at a separation of 10 -- 15 deg from Neptune. For more information on these calibrators, see http://carma.astro.umd.edu/cgi-bin/calfind.cgi 220225230235frequency (GHz)810121416Flux density (Jy)B array, new correlatorB array, old correlatorD array229.54230.19230.84frequency (GHz)810121416Flux density (Jy)4 S. H. Luszcz-Cook, I. de Pater, M. Wright B-array correlator setup, prior to 2011. This setup corresponds to configuration 'd' as specified in Table 1 of Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013). In this paper only data within the frequencies spanned by this correlator setup are considered. TABLE 1 Band center frequency Nominal bandwidtha Final bandwidthb Start frequencyb,c End frequencyb,c Channel spacing 224.387 GHz 225.537 GHz 229.538 GHz 230.688 GHz 230.538 GHz 224.247 GHz 225.397 GHz 229.397 GHz 230.547 GHz 230.517 GHz 281 MHz 281 MHz 281 MHz 281 MHz 42.0 MHz 500 MHz 500 MHz 500 MHz 500 MHz 62 MHz 224.528 GHz 225.678 GHz 229.679 GHz 230.829 GHz 230.559 GHz 31.25 MHz 31.25 MHz 31.25 MHz 31.25 MHz 0.9766 MHz aCARMA correlator bands labeled as having a nominal width of 500 MHz bands actually have a total width of 468.75 MHz bafter flagging of edge channels cfrequency of band edge, NOT frequency at the center of the edge channel correlator in late 2010, the channel spacing decreased in both the 62-MHz and 500-MHz bands, and five addi- tional dual bands were available during our 2011 obser- vations. These additional bands were all configured to maximum bandwidth mode, allowing for more continu- ous coverage of the wide CO line. Figure 2 illustrates the location of the correlator bands for the B-array observa- tions prior to and after the correlator upgrade, as well as the frequency coverage of the D-array data. In this pa- per, we restrict our analysis to the frequencies spanned by the original correlator setup (Table 1), where we have the most data and therefore the greatest sensitivity. We perform editing and calibration on each raw visi- bility dataset using the Multichannel Image Reconstruc- tion, Image Analysis and Display (MIRIAD; Sault et al. 2011) software package. After flagging edge channels and poor quality data, we perform passband calibra- tion. Then we correct for atmospheric and instrumen- tal effects on the observed visibilities. We determine the time-dependent antenna-based gains by self-calibrating the wide-band data and then applying the gain solutions to the full dataset. The absolute flux scale of each dataset is set by scaling the antenna gains for each day of B-array data so that the amplitudes of the visibilities match the amplitudes of the D-array data at overlapping (u,v) dis- tances6. A complete description of the data reduction is provided in Appendix A. 3. MODEL A series of model image cubes were created using the line-by-line radiative transfer code described in Luszcz- Cook and de Pater (2013), and using Neptune's atmo- spheric properties as described therein. We adopt the thermal profile of Fletcher et al. (2010) in the upper at- mosphere, and an H2S abundance corresponding to 50 times the protosolar S/H abundance. As our nominal case, we model the CO (2-1) absorption assuming that the CO abundance is vertically distributed according to the best-fit solution of Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013) for the above-mentioned atmosphere 7: 1.1 ppm of CO at altitudes above 0.16 bar and 0.0 ppm of CO deeper than this level. At each of 155,575 locations on the disk (0.005" pixels), we integrate the equation of radiative transfer for the appropriate viewing angle µ (the cosine 6 The u and v coordinates describe the East-West and North- South components of the projected interferometer baseline. The (u,v) distance is defined as the projected baseline length. 7 Several of the atmospheric models in Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013) do not include any H2S; here, we adopt the best-fit solution for the model which has a 50 times solar abundance of H2S. of the emission angle), accounting for the Doppler shift due to the planet's rotation (Moreno et al. 2001). These high-resolution models can be converted from brightness temperature units into Jy/pixel, to be used as starting models for the deconvolution process (Section 4, Ap- pendix B). They can also be rebinned to the coarser map resolution and convolved with a Gaussian beam, and directly compared with the data (Section 5). For the latter purpose, alternative models are also produced by assuming the same vertical CO structure (the same transition pressure, and no tropospheric CO), but vary- ing the stratospheric CO abundance; or alternatively by maintaining the nominal CO structure and abundance but varying the temperature or composition (other than CO) with latitude. 4. IMAGING After combining all tracks of B- and D-array visibility data, we produce images of Neptune in four steps: first we use our visibility data to make a set of maps of the estimated sky intensity distribution. The FWHM (full width at half maximum) of the image point spread func- tion, or synthesized beam, is in the range of 0.33 -- 0.37" x 0.37 -- 0.39", depending on frequency; the pixel size used in the maps is 0.09". Next, we estimate the noise in our maps due to calibration errors and atmospheric fluc- tuations. We find that the noise level is approximately three times greater than one would expect from thermal noise from the atmosphere and receiver system, likely because of the unfavorable weather during observations. We then perform deconvolution to remove the response to source structure in the side lobes of the synthesized TABLE 2 Characteristics of final maps. Noise in each final map is calculated as the root mean square of the noise in the input maps, divided by the square root of the number of input images. See Appendix B.2 for a discussion of noise estimation in the original (imaging) maps. Average frequency offset from line center 0.0 MHz 4.6 MHz 9.2 MHz 13.8 MHz 18.4 MHz 66 MHz 213 MHz 1.00 GHz 5.58 GHz frequency Effective widtha (MHz) 4.6 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 125 125 250 500 Noise in averaged map (mJy/beam) 28.3 19.9 20.2 19.7 19.3 8.13 7.62 6.01 3.71 aTotal frequency width averaged to create the map. beam. Finally, we average deconvolved images that are at similar frequency offsets from the CO (2-1) line center, in order to increase signal-to-noise without compromis- ing our sensitivity to the vertical structure in Neptune's atmosphere, i.e., we combine channels which have sim- ilar contribution functions (Fig. 1). We also bin the data according to latitude to look for meaningful latitu- dinal trends in Neptune's observed brightness. Table 2 lists the central frequency and total frequency width of each final image, along with our estimate of the noise in units of mJy/beam. The details of the imaging process are presented in Appendix B; this description includes a discussion of the final error estimates and the binning technique. A comparison of deconvolution methods is given in Appendix C. The images and latitude-binned plots are presented in Figs. 3 -- 5. The top panel within each column is the fi- nal, averaged map at the indicated frequency offset (δν) from line center. The FWHM of the center of the synthe- sized beam, which denotes the spatial resolution of the map, is indicated by the filled red ellipse in the lower left corner. The arrow points in the direction of Neptune's north pole. Below each map, we also present two 'resid- ual maps', which illustrate the variations between the data and a 'flat' (uniform brightness) disk; and from the nominal, horizontally uniform model described in Section 3 (second and third from the top, respectively). The first of these residual maps emphasizes the variations across the disk due to changes in emission angle (limb bright- ening/darkening); the latter highlights horizontal varia- tions in the composition and/or thermal profile. Below each set of images, we present the latitude-binned data, as compared to the latitude-binned flat disk and model. To look for spatial variations in the observed atmospheric properties, we also show the residuals between the hor- izontally uniform nominal model and the data. These figures are discussed further in the following section. 5. RESULTS 5.1. Continuum variations The image at an average offset of 5.6 GHz from line center (Fig. 3) is representative of the millimeter contin- uum. The most noticeable spatial variation we observe in the data is significant limb-darkening, as is predicted by the radiative transfer mode. We also observe arti- facts induced by calibration errors and atmospheric fluc- tuations, which create a noticeable 'ringing' pattern in the images. Averaging the data with respect to latitude mitigates this issue, but higher-quality observations are necessary to produce images without these artifacts. Additionally, the data in Fig. 3 show two trends in latitude with respect to the nominal (horizontally con- stant composition and temperature) model. The first is an overall offset in the brightness between the contin- uum data and nominal model. We compare the inte- grated flux density of the data and model and find that the difference is −0.41 ± 0.02 Jy, or −2.9 ± 0.1 K. This 3% continuum offset could be due to issues in calibration as well as real deficiencies in our model of the contin- uum; this is discussed more thoroughly in Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013). Here we concentrate on the second observed trend in the data: latitudinal variations in the continuum brightness. We observe that Neptune's south 5 Fig. 3. -- Average of the four maps with frequency offsets from line center of 5 -- 6 GHz. Emission at these frequencies is primarily millimeter continuum. Top image is the final, deconvolved and av- eraged map. The average beam is indicated by the red circle in the bottom left corner of the image. Second image from the top shows the same data with a (beam-convolved) uniform brightness disk subtracted. The white circle indicates the location of the planet's limb, and the red arrow indicates the direction of the rotation axis. The third image from the top has the beam-convolved nominal (horizontally uniform composition and temperature) model sub- tracted. In the plot (bottom) we zonally average the image (red points) and nominal model (black) as described in Section 3. For reference, we also show the average of the beam-convolved uniform brightness disk as a function of latitude (blue). The differences between the nominal model and the data (and between the nomi- nal model and a uniform brightness disk) are shown in the bottom part of the plot. pole appears to be brighter than mid- and northern lati- tudes; this is highlighted in panel (a) of Fig. 6, which is a scaled version of Fig. 3. To determine the significance of this result, we calculate χ2: M−1(cid:88) χ2 = δy2 m σ2 meas,m m=0 (1) where M is the number of data points in the fit, the pa- 6 S. H. Luszcz-Cook, I. de Pater, M. Wright Fig. 4. -- Same as Fig. 3, except for δν = 66, 213, and 1000 MHz. rameter δym is the difference between the data and model values for point m, and σmeas,m is the measurement er- ror for point m. We use the latitude-binned data for this calculation, so that δym is the difference between the av- erage flux density of the data and the model in bin m (in Jy/beam); and σmeas,m is 3.71 mJy/beam (the noise es- timate in the map within a single beam), divided by the square root of the number of beams in bin m, as shown by the error bars in Fig. 6. Since points from neighbor- ing latitude bins are correlated (the width of each bin is roughly equal to one beam), we include only every other point in the statistical fit, starting with the data point nearest the south pole, such that M = 4. The model that we use in calculating χ2 is the nominal model scaled by a constant factor of 0.97 to best match the data. We then compare the value of χ2 to the probability p of measur- ing that value for a set of experiments with a degree of freedom DOF = M − N (2) where N is the number fit parameters (in this case, N = 1). We find that for these data compared to the scaled, horizontally uniform nominal model, the calcu- lated χ2 = 8.8. For a fit of 3 degrees of freedom there is a probability p = 0.03 of a χ2 value this high occurring due to chance. We therefore conclude that real spatial variations in Neptune's millimeter continuum are likely, and we explore the mechanisms that could cause such variations. The contribution function at an offset of 5 GHz from the CO line center peaks at a depth of 4 bar, with most of the emission originating from depths of 1.1-4.7 bar. We expect that variations at these frequencies are likely due to opacity variations, as opposed to horizontal tem- perature variations, as the temperature profile is likely adiabatic in the troposphere. A decrease in gas opacity near the south pole would mean that warmer, deeper lay- ers are probed. To estimate the magnitude of change in optical depth that is required produce the observed flux densities, we first match the data by scaling the total optical depth in the model at the relevant pressures. We find that decrease of about 30% in the south at pressures greater than 1 bar is sufficient to match the observed lati- tudinal gradient. If we vary the opacity only at pressures greater than 2 bar, we require the opacity to be lower by a factor of 2 in the south (e.g. from the nominal opacity at 40◦N to 0.5 times nominal near the south pole). If we restrict the opacity variations to pressures greater than 3 7 Fig. 5. -- Same as Fig. 3, except for δν = 0 -- 18 MHz. These images average over the smallest frequency interval (4.6 MHz for δν = 0, 9.2 MHz for the others), and therefore have the highest level of noise, as indicated by the error bars in the plots. bar, we require a factor of 5-10 decrease in the opacity in the south and if variations are only at pressures greater than 4 bar, the opacity must be of order 50 times lower in the south than at 40◦N to match the observations. Therefore, the total opacity change across the disk im- plied by our data depends on the pressures at which the opacity changes, which is determined by what opacity source is responsible. We investigate how variations in three atmospheric properties might cause the observed trend: the H2S abundance, the CH4 abundance and the H2 ortho/para ratio. The dominant opacity sources in our model at pres- sures of 1.1-4.7 bar are H2S opacity and H2 collision- induced absorption (CIA). For an H2S abundance of 50 times solar, H2S opacity begins to dominate over CIA at pressures greater than 3.3 bar. The precise value and variation of the H2S abundance in Neptune's tro- posphere is poorly constrained, though cm-wavelength observations suggest it may vary with latitude accord- ing to the meridional circulation pattern (Martin et al. 2008; Hofstadter et al. 2008; Butler et al. 2012). We find that we can reproduce the latitudinal behavior observed in our data by varying the H2S opacity by a factor of ∼30 from the south pole to 40◦N. Figure 6b shows the expected residuals for a case where the H2S opacity has the nominal value from 10◦N to 40◦N, 0.3 times the nom- inal value from 40◦S to 10◦N, and 0.03 times the nominal value between 90◦S and 40◦S. This model has also been scaled by a factor of 0.95 to match the integrated flux of the data. A decrease or increase in CH4 can also affect the bright- ness temperature, even though methane on its own does not contribute directly to the opacity (de Pater and Mitchell 1993). CH4 condensation can change the adi- abatic profile; however, we adopt a dry adiabat in the upper atmosphere (Luszcz-Cook and de Pater 2013), so CH4 does not affect our models in this way. Although the CH4 mole fraction in the troposphere is only 2.2% (Baines et al. 1995), the collision-induced absorption co- efficient for H2-CH4 pairs is roughly 20 times higher than for H2-H2 pairs under the relevant conditions. As a re- sult, H2-CH4 CIA accounts for as much as 35% of the total optical depth in the 1-4 bar region. As for H2S, we determine the magnitude of variations that are re- quired to reproduce the observed intensity gradient: we find that the south polar region must be depleted in tro- 8 S. H. Luszcz-Cook, I. de Pater, M. Wright Fig. 6. -- Latitude variations in the continuum map. Panel (a) is adapted from Fig. 3, with a different scaling of the color bar and y plot axis. The image is the δν = 5.6 GHz data with the beam-convolved, horizontally uniform composition and temperature model subtracted. The plot shows the latitude-binned residuals of the data−model. The filled white circle in the bottom left corner represents the full width at half maximum of the beam. The black circle indicates the location of Neptune's limb, and the black arrow indicates the direction of the rotation axis. Panel (b) shows a (scaled) model in which the H2S opacity has the nominal value from 10◦N to 40◦N, 0.3 times the nominal value from 40◦S to 10◦N, and 0.03 times the nominal value between 90◦S and 40◦S. The nominal model has been subtracted as in (a). The plot beneath the image shows the same data, binned in latitude (black diamonds). The data points from (a) are in grey. Panels (c) and (d) are the same as (b), with different models: (c) shows a model where the tropospheric CH4 mole fraction is 0.044 (twice the nominal value of 0.022) from 10◦N to 40◦N, .022 from 40◦S to 10◦N, and 0.0055 (25% of nominal) between 90◦S and 40◦S, is shown; (d) shows a (scaled) model where the equilibrium hydrogen fraction is 0.6 from 10◦N to 40◦N, 0.8 from 40◦S to 10◦N, and 1.0 between 90◦S and 40◦S. pospheric CH4 by a factor of order 10 relative to 40◦N. Figure 6c shows the expected residuals for a case where the tropospheric CH4 mole fraction is 0.044 (twice the nominal value of 0.022) from 10◦N to 40◦N, 0.022 from 40◦S to 10◦N, and 0.0055 (25% of nominal) between 90◦S and 40◦S. The disk-averaged CH4 mole fraction for this example is 0.021, which is close to the expected nominal value. As in Fig. 6b, a scale factor (in this case, 0.97) has been applied to the model to match the data. assumes 'intermediate' hydrogen as the nominal case. That is, the ortho and para states of hydrogen are in equilibrium at the local temperature, but the specific heat is near that of 'normal' hydrogen. This situation is described in Massie and Hunten (1982). Fast verti- cal mixing from the deep interior, however, could bring the ortho/para ratio closer to the 3:1 ratio expected for normal hydrogen. We investigate the effect of variations in the fraction of para-H2 on the opacity, while assum- ing the adiabatic profile for normal hydrogen everywhere. We find that normal hydrogen has a higher opacity than 'equilibrium' hydrogen. The average intensity is 5-6 K Finally, we consider variations in the H2 ortho/para ra- tio as a source of continuum intensity variations. As in Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013), our nominal model lower when we assume normal hydrogen rather than equi- librium hydrogen. This implies that variations in the or- tho/para ratio are more than capable of causing intensity variations of the magnitude observed in our data. We can match the observed latitudinal variations by decreasing the fraction of hydrogen in the equilibrium state from 1.0 at the south pole to 0.6 at 40◦N (Fig. 6d), and scaling this model by a factor of 0.98. 5.2. Variations near the tropopause The images at frequency offsets of 0 -- 1000 MHz sense lower pressures than the continuum map, due to a con- tribution from CO to the opacity. Therefore these maps include information on altitudes near and above the tropopause at ∼0.1 bar (Fig. 1). Since observations to- wards the limb sense higher altitudes, we expect maps further from line center to be limb-darkened, whereas at line center, where the emission originates in the strato- sphere, we expect limb-brightening. This is indicated in Figs. 4 and 5, which show the data relative to the nomi- nal radiative transfer model and to a uniform brightness ('flat') disk. We find that the limb-darkening can be ob- served above the noise in maps at offsets of 14-1000 MHz; the limb-brightening signal is marginally detected in the middle map (flat disk subtracted) at line center (δν = 0). Latitudinal trends in the data are more difficult to observe in these maps than in the continuum map, since these data are averaged over smaller frequency windows and therefore have lower signal-to-noise. This is partic- ularly true for the images in Fig. 5 which are typically averaged over only 9.2 MHz. We concentrate our anal- ysis on the latitude-binned data at offsets of 0-213 MHz from line center, as shown in Fig. 7. Interpretation of the 1000-MHz data is complicated by substantial contri- butions from continuum opacity sources; therefore these data are excluded from further analysis. We note that the plots in Fig. 7 show a consistent lat- itudinal behavior: the south pole appears bright relative to our nominal model, southern mid-latitudes are rela- tively dark, and additional brightening occurs near the equator before the intensity falls off again at northern mid-latitudes. Variations at these frequencies could be due to variations in the CO abundance, variations in the temperature, or a combination of the two. We there- fore compare these data to three sets of models with the following properties: horizontally uniform CO and temperature profiles; a meridionally varying CO profile and horizontally uniform temperature profile; and a hor- izontally uniform CO profile and meridionally varying temperature profile. For each model of interest, we cal- culate χ2 as in Section 5.1, using every other data point to avoid correlations between data. We determine χ2 for each frequency separately (DOF = 4), as well as for the data from all seven mapping frequencies simultaneously (DOF = 28). The results are presented in Table 3 and discussed below. For a fit with 4 degrees of freedom, a single measured value of χ2 4 has a probability p = 0.05 of being greater than 9.5. For a fit with 28 degrees of free- dom, χ2 28 > 41.3 with a probability p = 0.05. Therefore, we reject fits with χ2 4 > 9.5 and χ2 28 > 41.3. 5.2.1. Horizontally uniform CO and temperature We find that for the maps 0-18 MHz from line center, the nominal model, which maintains a uniform abun- 9 dance of 1.1 ppm of CO in the stratosphere, is consis- tent with the data. At larger offsets from line center (66 and 213 MHz) the nominal model is rejected; at these wavelengths the total frequency width averaged to pro- duce the images is greater, resulting in smaller error bars; therefore the deviations are more statistically significant. When we consider the full dataset, we find that the nom- inal model has an acceptable value of χ2 of 32.6. In addition to our nominal model, we produce mod- els with 0.5, 0.8, 1.2 and 1.5 times the nominal CO abundance, with no latitudinal variation. Again we find that at large offsets from line center these models are inconsistent with the data. Figure 7 shows that, for these frequencies, and increase or decrease of more than 20% in the CO abundance produces models that are too high/low to match the data at δν = 66 and 213 MHz, for the given spatial resolution. At smaller offsets, the effect of changing the CO abundance becomes more com- plex. At an offset of 5 MHz, for example, an increase or decrease in the CO abundance will lead to an over- all brighter model: increasing the CO abundance would increase the limb brightening, while decreasing the CO abundance would increase the intensity at disk center. We conclude that models of this form (with no latitu- dinal variations in the CO abundance or temperature) are not capable of reproducing the observed trend in the CO abundance with latitude, and models with higher and lower CO abundances significantly decrease the goodness of fit of the full dataset. 5.2.2. Meridionally varying CO, horizontally uniform temperature An interesting possibility is that the observed varia- tions in Neptune's brightness could be due to latitudinal variations in the CO abundance, related to localized in- fall or circulation effects. We compare the data to several simple models. First, we increase the CO abundance by 20% over the nominal value in the northern hemisphere and decrease it by 20% in the south, and vice versa. A southern hemisphere increase in the CO abundance is the better match of the two, but does not reproduce the brightening we observe near the south pole and causes an increase in χ2 for the 66 MHz, 213 MHz, and com- bined datasets. We also try three slightly more complex models. In the first case, we increase the CO abundance by 20% at high latitudes (above 60◦), and decrease it by 20% elsewhere. We repeat this for an increase at mid-latitudes (between 30 and 60◦N and S) and near the equator (30◦S to 30◦N). We find that an increase in the CO at mid-latitudes provides a qualitatively good match to the data at 66 and 213 MHz and decreases the value of χ2 for the full dataset. However, for frequency offsets less than 66 MHz, the quality of the fit generally decreases. Despite this, we do not rule out a model in which the CO abundance is higher at mid-latitudes. 5.2.3. Horizontally uniform CO, meridionally varying temperature Variations in the zonal mean temperature have been observed near Neptune's tropopause in infrared images from the Voyager 2 spacecraft (Conrath et al. 1998) and the Very Large Telescope (VLT) (Orton et al. 2007). The latitude coverage of the Voyager IRIS data extend from 80◦S to 30◦N: Conrath et al. (1998) find a 100-mbar 10 S. H. Luszcz-Cook, I. de Pater, M. Wright Fig. 7. -- Comparison of the zonally-averaged data and models, for frequency offsets of 0 -- 213 MHz. First two columns are the CLEAN maps and nominal-model subtracted maps. The full width at half maximum of the beam is shown by a filled red circle. In the difference maps, the limb is indicated by a white circle and the direction of the rotation axis is shown by a red arrow. For each set of data−model comparisons, the top portion of each plot shows the binned data (red squares) with errors and several comparison models (identified at the top of each column). Below each plot is a difference plot, showing the same data and models with the nominal model subtracted, highlighting spatial variations in brightness due to variations in opacity and/or temperature. The first column of plots shows a selection of horizontally uniform CO, uniform temperature models (Section 5.2.1). The second column of plots presents horizontally uniform temperature, meridionally varying CO models (Section 5.2.2). The final column presents three horizontally uniform CO, meridionally varying temperature models (Section 5.2.3). temperature minimum (4-5 K cooler than the equator) near 45◦S, as well as a decrease in temperature at the northernmost extent of their data. The measurements of Orton et al. (2007) extend all the way to the south pole. These authors find similar latitudinal behavior of the temperature from their 17.6 (Orton model 'A') and 18.7 µm VLT (Orton model 'B') images. Near the south pole, they observe 100-mbar temperatures that are 7-10 K higher than elsewhere on the planet. To test the impact of these temperature variations on our models, we adjust the Fletcher et al. (2010) tem- perature profile with latitude to match the temperature variations reported by Conrath et al. (1998) and Orton et al. (2007) at 100 mbar. For simplicity, the tempera- ture profile is modified by the same temperature offset at all altitudes above 1 bar. We acknowledge that this paradigm is most likely overly simplistic: the 2D tem- perature cross sections of Conrath et al. (1998) show that temperature variations appear to be located pri- marily near the tropopause, with a gradual decrease in the meridional variations with altitude to nearly uniform within a few scale heights. However, Fig. 1 illustrates that much of the emission at 5-200 MHz from line center originates from near the tropopause, and from contin- uum opacity sources well below the tropopause (where the temperature should not vary and is not adjusted). We expect that models of this form are adequate for a first test of the effects of temperature variations on our maps. We find that these varying temperature models provide a good match to the data overall, and decrease the value of χ2 at all frequencies (Fig. 7 and Table 3). The Orton models of the zonal mean temperature pro- file are in general a better match to the data than the Conrath et al. (1998) solution; this is partially because the Conrath et al. (1998) model does not extend to the south pole. The frequency at which the least improvement is ob- served is 213 MHz from line center. Figure 7 shows that the varying temperature models do qualitatively repro- duce the latitudinal behavior seen at this frequency; how- ever, there appears to be an overall offset between the data and these models. Of the wavelengths considered, the data at δν =213 MHz has the greatest contribution from continuum emission (Fig. 1), and therefore we con- sider the possibility that such an offset exists due to the continuum issues discussed in Section 5.1. To test this, we refit each of the models for δν = 213 MHz, allow- ing for an overall scaling of the models to best match the data. We find that the fit improves dramatically for the varying temperature models when we allow for such a scale factor. We note that the fit also improves for several other models when we allow a scale factor in the fitting process; however we caution that in several instances the scale factors found in the fit have a value greater than 3%, which seems unlikely given the results of Section 5.1. These cases are indicated in Table 3. To summarize, we find that the following models are not rejected by our χ2 analysis: the nominal model, in which the CO and thermal profiles are horizontally uni- form; the model in which the stratospheric CO abun- dance is increased at mid-latitudes and decreased else- where; and the three models in which the temperature profile varies with latitude to match the results of Or- ton et al. (2007) and Conrath et al. (1998). Of these models, the nominal model appears to be ruled out as a fit to either the δν =66 MHz or the δν =213 MHz data when considered alone; furthermore, the four indicated test models all offer an improvement in the fit quality to the full dataset over the nominal model, with the greatest improvement for the varying temperature models. This improvement is even more dramatic when we allow the models at 213 MHz to have an applied scale factor to account for continuum opacity issues. 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Maps of Neptune are presented at frequency offsets of δν = 0 MHz -- 5.6 GHz from the center of the CO (2-1) line at 230.538 GHz. Far from the CO line, the observed emission is primarily from the continuum, and the opac- ity is dominated by H2S absorption and H2 CIA. Our observations show that the region near the south pole is brighter than other latitudes. Similarly, centimeter- 11 wavelength observations have shown that the south pole (Martin et al. 2006, 2008; Hofstadter et al. 2008) and equator (Butler et al. 2012) are bright compared to the rest of the planet. This has been attributed to a global circulation pattern in which air rises at mid- southern and northern latitudes and subsides near the equator and south pole; the subsidence of dry air would decrease the gas opacity allowing thermal emission from deeper levels to be observed. We model the potential effects of three opacity sources on Neptune's millimeter continuum: the H2S abundance, the tropospheric methane abundance, and deviations from equilibrium in the ortho/para ratio of hydrogen. We find that our observations can be re- produced by latitudinal variations in the H2S opacity; a good match to the data is found by a model in which the H2S opacity has the nominal value from 10◦N to 40◦N, 0.3 times the nominal value from 40◦S to 10◦N, and 0.03 times the nominal value between 90◦S and 40◦S. Such a decrease in the H2S opacity near the south pole could cause an increase in the brightness temperature in this location at longer wavelengths as well. For opacity sources that dominate at higher altitudes in the atmosphere, such as H2 CIA, a smaller change in the opacity would be enough to produce the latitudinal trend in brightness observed in our continuum data. We can alternatively model the observed latitudinal varia- tions by decreasing the CH4 mole fraction from 0.044 at 10◦N -- 40◦N to 0.022 at 40◦S -- 10◦N and 0.0055 be- tween 90◦S and 40◦S. While most previous studies (e.g. Roe et al. 2001; Gibbard et al. 2002; Irwin et al. 2011) assume that Neptune's methane mole fraction is con- stant in the troposphere with latitude, Karkoschka and Tomasko (2011) find that CH4 is depressed between 1.2 and 3.3 bar at high southern latitudes, compared to its abundance at low latitudes. While we estimate some- what larger variations in the CH4 mole fraction (a to- tal change of a factor of 8 rather than a factor of ∼3 found by Karkoschka and Tomasko (2011)), the similar- ities between our estimated latitudinal CH4 profile and that derived by Karkoschka and Tomasko (2011) are con- spicuous. Variations in the ortho/para ratio of hydrogen can also cause variations in the continuum intensity, and we find that a decrease from an equilibrium hydrogen fraction of 1.0 at the south pole to 0.6 at 40◦N produces the observed latitudinal trend. Baines et al. (1995) deter- mined that the hydrogen in Neptune's upper troposphere is near equilibrium; however, Conrath et al. (1998) mea- sured a decrease in the para hydrogen fraction from equi- librium at latitudes of 0◦ -- 60◦S, and an increase in the para fraction over the equilibrium value near the south pole and in the northern hemisphere. This result qualita- tively agrees with the pattern we observe near the south pole and equator, although we do not see a rise in the intensity in the northern hemisphere in our data, which we would expect from an increase in the para fraction at these latitudes. We note that we do not investigate the effects of changing the adiabatic profile. This has been studied previously: de Pater and Mitchell (1993) show the effect of equilibrium, normal and intermediate hydrogen on Neptune's microwave spectrum between 0.1 and 10 mm by changing both the adiabatic profile and the CIA opacity. They show that the brightness tem- perature is highest for intermediate H2, and lowest for equilibrium H2. 12 S. H. Luszcz-Cook, I. de Pater, M. Wright TABLE 3 Calculated χ2 values for the latitude-binned data and a set of test models. See Section 5.2 for a description of each model. Every other bin, starting with the bin centered at 80◦S, is used in calculated χ2, since data from neighboring bins are correlated. For individual maps (unscaled models), DOF = 4 and the probability p of obtaining χ2 > χ2 4 > 9.5. For the scaled models at δν = 213 4 due to chance is less than 0.05 for χ2 3 > 7.8. When considering all frequency offsets simultaneously, DOF = 28 and p ≤ 0.05 for χ2 28 > 41.3 MHz, DOF = 3 and p ≤ 0.05 for χ2 (DOF = 27 and p ≤ 0.05 for χ2 27 > 40.1 for all data when the δν = 213 MHz data are scaled.) Frequency offset χ2 0.0 MHz 4.6 MHz 9.2 MHz 13.8 MHz 18.4 MHz 66 MHz 213 MHz nominal model 1.9 2.8 2.0 2.8 2.1 10.8 10.2 50% CO 80% CO 0.9 3.9 3.9 7.6 7.3 33.0 15.3 2.9 10.4 15.8 30.0 33.5 206.5 145.1 213 MHz, scaled 6.3 all all, scaled 213 MHz 32.6 28.7 4.5a 444.2 303.6 5.7 71.9 62.3 120% CO 5.9 2.8 1.5 1.4 1.1 29.6 49.7 6.7a 91.9 49.0 150% CO 18.8 4.5 1.4 1.4 2.5 97.5 165.1 6.9a 291.3 133.1 +CO in N 1.6 4.6 3.9 6.5 6.3 31.7 20.6 +CO in S 4.3 2.2 1.3 1.7 0.9 14.6 25.3 +CO high lat 2.0 3.7 3.9 7.6 7.0 34.0 19.4 19.4 75.2 74.0 5.3 50.3 30.3 14.2 77.5 72.2 +CO mid-lat 2.9 3.1 2.1 4.2 2.7 3.0 1.5 1.2 19.5 19.2 +CO equator 1.3 3.6 3.0 3.7 4.5 37.5 34.9 Orton 2007 'A' 1.2 1.2 0.9 1.9 0.9 4.3 8.9 Orton 2007 'B' 1.2 1.2 0.8 1.8 0.8 2.6 7.3 Conrath 1998 0.9 1.3 1.5 2.5 0.9 3.1 8.7 31.2 88.5 84.9 0.7 19.3 11.2 0.7 15.7 9.1 2.2 18.9 12.4 aBest-fit scale factor is greater than 3%, which is considered unlikely given the results for the continuum data. which is located on the Chajnantor plateau at an altitude of 5000m and will consist of 66 7- and 12-m antennas when completed, will provide unprecedented sensitivity and resolution for such observations. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The data presented in this work were obtained with CARMA. Support for CARMA construction was derived from the states of California, Illinois, and Maryland, the James S. McDonnell Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation, the University of Chicago, the As- sociates of the California Institute of Technology, and the National Science Foundation. Ongoing CARMA development and operations are supported by the Na- tional Science Foundation under a cooperative agree- ment, and by the CARMA partner universities. This work was supported by NASA Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship program - Grant NNX10AT17H; and by NSF Grant AST-0908575. The authors would like to thank L. Fletcher for provid- ing his temperature and CH4 profiles, and G. Orton for providing his H2 CIA absorption coefficients. The au- thors would also like to acknowledge R.L. Plambeck and A. Bauermeister for many helpful discussions. At frequency offsets δν =0 -- 213 MHz from line center, where we are sensitive to the CO abundance and temper- ature in the lower stratosphere, we find that the south pole and equator are relatively bright compared to the region near 45◦S and 40◦N. Maps at δν =66 MHz or the δν =213 MHz are inconsistent with the nominal model, which has a horizontally uniform CO and thermal pro- file. Introducing the temperature variations derived by Conrath et al. (1998) or Orton et al. (2007) into our mod- els successfully reproduces the observed latitudinal vari- ations. As discussed by Conrath et al. (1998) and Martin et al. (2008), the low temperatures at mid-latitudes are consistent with upward motion and adiabatic cooling, as suggested by the centimeter and millimeter continuum data. The increase in temperature near the south pole is likely due to increased solar insolence in this region (Hammel et al. 2007; Orton et al. 2007) and/or subsi- dence and adiabatic heating (Martin et al. 2008). We also compare the data to models in which the CO abundance varies with latitude; we find that a model in which the stratospheric CO abundance is increased at mid-latitudes and decreased elsewhere is also consistent with the data. We expect that any variations in the CO abundance must be less than 20%, at the resolution of our observations. These data suggest the utility of measurements in and near CO rotation lines for constraining latitudinal vari- ations in the thermal profile and opacity in Neptune's lower stratosphere and upper troposphere. Future ob- servations can improve on these results in several ways. First of all, poor weather during our observations in- creased the noise level and introduced ripples into the final maps, limiting the power of the dataset for ruling out alternative models. Secondly, in addition to being interesting in its own right, a better characterization of Neptune's continuum opacity is critical to better model- ing data within the CO line. For example, our analysis from Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013) indicates that H2S opacity has a small but non-negligible effect on the re- trieved vertical CO profile. Finally, in order to disentan- gle the effect of temperature and CO variations, spatial maps of several CO transitions are required. The At- acama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array (ALMA), REFERENCES 13 Baines, K. H., Mickelson, M. E., Larson, L. E., and Ferguson, D. W. (1995). The abundances of methane and ortho/para hydrogen on Uranus and Neptune: Implications of New Laboratory 4-0 H2 quadrupole line parameters. Icarus, 114:328 -- 340. Briggs, D. S. (1995). High Fidelity Interferometric Imaging: Robust Weighting and NNLS Deconvolution. In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, volume 27 of Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, page 112.02. Butler, B. J., Hofstadter, M., Gurwell, M., Orton, G., and Norwood, J. (2012). The Deep Atmosphere of Neptune From EVLA Observations. In AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, volume 44 of AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, page 504.06. Clark, B. G. (1980). An efficient implementation of the algorithm 'CLEAN'. A&A, 89:377. Conrath, B. J., Gierasch, P. J., and Ustinov, E. A. (1998). Thermal Structure and Para Hydrogen Fraction on the Outer Planets from Voyager IRIS Measurements. Icarus, 135:501 -- 517. de Pater, I. and Mitchell, D. L. (1993). Radio observations of the planets - The importance of laboratory measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 98:5471 -- 5490. de Pater, I., Romani, P. N., and Atreya, S. K. (1991). Possible microwave absorption by H2S gas in Uranus' and Neptune's atmospheres. Icarus, 91:220 -- 233. DeBoer, D. R. and Steffes, P. G. (1996). Estimates of the Tropospheric Vertical Structure of Neptune Based on Microwave Radiative Transfer Studies. Icarus, 123:324 -- 335. Fletcher, L. N., Drossart, P., Burgdorf, M., Orton, G. S., and Encrenaz, T. (2010). Neptune's atmospheric composition from AKARI infrared spectroscopy. A&A, 514:A17. Gibbard, S. G., Roe, H., de Pater, I., Macintosh, B., Gavel, D., Max, C. E., Baines, K. H., and Ghez, A. (2002). High-Resolution Infrared Imaging of Neptune from the Keck Telescope. Icarus, 156:1 -- 15. Hammel, H. B., Sitko, M. L., Lynch, D. K., Orton, G. S., Russell, R. W., Geballe, T. R., and de Pater, I. (2007). Distribution of Ethane and Methane Emission on Neptune. AJ, 134:637 -- 641. Hesman, B. E., Davis, G. R., Matthews, H. E., and Orton, G. S. (2007). The abundance profile of CO in Neptune's atmosphere. Icarus, 186:342 -- 353. Hofstadter, M. D., Butler, B. J., Gurwell, M. A., Hesman, B. E., and Devaraj, K. (2008). The Tropospheres of Uranus and Neptune as seen at Microwave Wavelengths. In AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #40, volume 40 of Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, page 488. Irwin, P. G. J., Teanby, N. A., Davis, G. R., Fletcher, L. N., Orton, G. S., Tice, D., Hurley, J., and Calcutt, S. B. (2011). Multispectral imaging observations of Neptune's cloud structure with Gemini-North. Icarus, 216:141 -- 158. Karkoschka, E. and Tomasko, M. G. (2011). The haze and methane distributions on Neptune from HST-STIS spectroscopy. Icarus, 211:780 -- 797. Lellouch, E., Moreno, R., and Paubert, G. (2005). A dual origin for Neptune's carbon monoxide? A&A, 430:L37 -- L40. Lodders, K. and Fegley, Jr., B. (1994). The origin of carbon monoxide in Neptune's atmosphere. Icarus, 112:368 -- 375. Luszcz-Cook, S. H. and de Pater, I. (2013). Constraining the origins of Neptune's carbon monoxide abundance with CARMA millimeter-wave observations. Icarus, 222:379 -- 400. Luszcz-Cook, S. H., de Pater, I., and Plambeck, R. L. (2010). Spatially Resolved Observations of CO in the Atmosphere of Neptune. In AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #42, volume 42 of AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, page 11.33. Marten, A., Gautier, D., Owen, T., Sanders, D., Tilanus, R. T., Deane, J., and Matthews, H. (1991). First Detections of CO and HCN in the Atmosphere of Neptune. In Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, volume 23 of Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, page 1164. Martin, S., de Pater, I., and Kloosterman, J. andHammel, H. B. (2008). Multi-wavelength observations of neptune's atmosphere. In EPSC Abstracts, pages EPSC2008 -- A -- 00277. Martin, S., de Pater, I., Kloosterman, J., Gibbard, S., and Hammel, H. B. (2006). Multi Wavelength imaging of Neptune at High Spatial Resolution. In AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #38, volume 38 of Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, page 502. Massie, S. T. and Hunten, D. M. (1982). Conversion of para and ortho hydrogen in the Jovian planets. Icarus, 49:213 -- 226. Moreno, R., Marten, A., Biraud, Y., B´ezard, B., Lellouch, E., Paubert, G., and Wild, W. (2001). Jovian stratospheric temperature during the two months following the impacts of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. Planet. Space Sci., 49:473 -- 486. Moreno, R., Marten, A., Matthews, H. E., and Biraud, Y. (2003). Long-term evolution of CO, CS and HCN in Jupiter after the impacts of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. Planet. Space Sci., 51:591 -- 611. Moses, J. I. (1992). Meteoroid ablation in Neptune's atmosphere. Icarus, 99:368 -- 383. Orton, G. S., Encrenaz, T., Leyrat, C., Puetter, R., and Friedson, A. J. (2007). Evidence for methane escape and strong seasonal and dynamical perturbations of Neptune's atmospheric temperatures. A&A, 473:L5 -- L8. Prinn, R. G. and Barshay, S. S. (1977). Carbon monoxide on Jupiter and implications for atmospheric convection. Science, 198:1031 -- 1034. Rich, J. W., de Blok, W. J. G., Cornwell, T. J., Brinks, E., Walter, F., Bagetakos, I., and Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. (2008). Multi-Scale CLEAN: A Comparison of its Performance Against Classical CLEAN on Galaxies Using THINGS. AJ, 136:2897 -- 2920. Roe, H. G., Gavel, D., Max, C., de Pater, I., Gibbard, S., Macintosh, B., and Baines, K. H. (2001). Near-Infrared Observations of Neptune's Tropospheric Cloud Layer with the Lick Observatory Adaptive Optics System. AJ, 122:1636 -- 1643. Romani, P. N., de Pater, I., and Atreya, S. K. (1989). Neptune's deep atmosphere revealed. Geophys. Res. Lett., 16:933 -- 936. Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., and Wright, M. C. H. (2011). MIRIAD: Multi-channel Image Reconstruction, Image Analysis, and Display. In Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1106.007, page 6007. APPENDIX DATA REDUCTION We perform editing and calibration on the raw visibility data using the Multichannel Image Reconstruction, Image Analysis and Display (MIRIAD; Sault et al. 2011) software package. We flag 10 edge channels in the narrow band centered on the CO line and three edge channels in the wide bands; the narrow window in the opposite sideband from the CO line is flagged entirely. Poor quality data are also flagged. After performing passband calibration, we correct for atmospheric and instrumental effects on the observed visibilities by determining the time-dependent antenna-based gains using the wide-band data. An initial self calibration is performed in two steps using the phase calibrator: a record-by-record phase solution is found for the phase calibrator to remove short-term variations. This is followed by a phase and amplitude self calibration on the phase calibrator using a time interval corresponding to one observing cycle; these gain solutions are then applied to the Neptune data to correct for slow variations in the antenna gains. Finally, a record-by-record phase-only self calibration is performed on Neptune itself to remove short-term phase variations in the Neptune data. We find that since the rms path errors are a large fraction of the wavelength of the observations, the phase coherence is too poor for self calibration to successfully determine the phase solutions for isolated remote antennas. This ultimately causes systematic errors in the final maps; we discuss this further in Appendix B.2. The absolute flux scale of CARMA visibility data is typically set using observations of a calibrator of 'known' flux, usually a planet. Flux calibration using this method is expected to be accurate to roughly 20%. During our D-array observations, only a single dataset contained observations of a primary flux calibrator (MWC3498). As described in Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013) we flux-calibrated this dataset in the standard way using an assumed value of 1.86 Jy for MWC349 at 230 GHz. Then, we binned the Neptune visibility data for each D-array dataset into 8 (u,v) bins between 0 and 80 kλ, and adjusted the flux calibration to align the binned visibilities between tracks as much as possible. Finally, during the analysis of Neptune's disk-integrated spectrum, we determined an overall correction factor to the 8 http://cedarflat.mmarray.org/fluxcal/primary_sp_index. htm 14 S. H. Luszcz-Cook, I. de Pater, M. Wright flux calibration that optimizes the match between the data and our best-fit model. As discussed in Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013), the continuum slope of our best-fit model is not a perfect match to the data, resulting in model fluxes that are systematically too high by ∼ 2% near 225 GHz and too low by ∼ 2% near 236 GHz as compared to the disk-integrated measurements. For the present analysis, we scale the D-array visibilities by the flux correction factor determined from the fit to our nominal model (Section 3). We then bin the Neptune visibility data for each individual B-array dataset in intervals of 10 kλ at (u,v) distances for which both B- and D-array data are present (40 -- 80 kλ). Finally, we adjust the overall flux scale for each B-array track to align the binned visibility data with the D-array data. The real parts of the calibrated visibilities from the B and D configurations are plotted as a function of projected baseline length in Fig. 8, where each point is the average over one observing cycle. For reference, the shape of the visibility function corresponding to a circularly symmetric, uniform disk is a Bessel function. After flux calibration, Neptune's measured disk-integrated flux density is 12.3 Jy at 225 GHz and 12.2 Jy at 229.5 GHz. Fig. 8. -- The real part of the visibilities, shown as a function of projected baseline length. Each data point is the average over a single observing cycle (8 minutes in the B configuration, 15 minutes in the D configuration). The purple points are the short baseline, D-array data, which sample large angular scales. The B-array data (blue/green/orange for data taken in the winter of 2008/2009 -- 2010/2011, respectively) measure smaller-scale structure. Both arrays have some baselines with projected lengths of 40-80 kλ; the D-array data at these baseline lengths are used to flux-calibrate the B-array data as described in Appendix A. IMAGING AND DECONVOLUTION We produce maps of Neptune's flux in four steps: first we convert our visibility data into a set of maps of the sky intensity distribution. Then, we estimate the noise in the maps due to atmospheric and instrumental effects. Using this estimate, we perform deconvolution to remove the response to source structure in the side lobes of the synthesized beam. Finally, we average images to increase signal-to-noise, and bin the data according to latitude to look for trends in Neptune's observed brightness. Imaging We use the Common Astronomy Software Applications (CASA) data reduction package9 to convert our visibility data into maps of the sky intensity distribution. The frequency resolution of these maps is selected to be lower than the original channel spacing of the visibility data in order to improve the signal-to-noise in the images: from the 62 MHz band centered on the CO line, we define 9 frequency intervals of width 4.6 MHz. From the 500 MHz bands, we select eight 125 MHz frequency windows for mapping. The original channels are combined in the imaging step using multi-frequency synthesis mode. As mentioned in Section 2, the imaging windows are chosen to cover the frequencies where we have the most data. The frequencies of these imaging windows are listed in Table 4. We apply intermediate weighting to the visibilities with a Briggs visibility weighting robustness parameter (Briggs 1995) of 0.0. We use the mosaic option to properly handle the three different primary beam patterns of the heterogeneous CARMA array. The pixel size used in the maps is 0.09"; the shape of the synthesized beam varies between images, with a FWHM in the range of 0.33 -- 0.37" x 0.37 -- 0.39". Calibration errors and atmospheric fluctuations introduce complex-valued multiplicative errors into the data. As noted in Section 2, the rms path errors in our data are as high as 350 µm, which is roughly 1/3 of the observing wavelength and well above CARMA's 150 µm Error determination 9 http://casa.nrao.edu 15 criterion for good 1-mm observing conditions. We are able to correct for these errors on some baselines using self calibration (Appendix A); however the phase coherence is too poor for this technique to be successful on isolated remote antennas, which results in increased errors in our final maps above the value expected from thermal noise from the atmosphere and receiver system. We can estimate the noise by subtracting a model from the data and making an image. The average rms in the 4.6 MHz model-subtracted images is 28 mJy/beam, 2.7 times the value expected from thermal noise. The rms in the 125 MHz images is on average 7.8 mJy/beam, 3.3 times the value expected from thermal noise. Another estimate of the noise can be be obtained by making an imaginary image from the non-Hermitian part of the data. For a real valued sky brightness intensity, the visibility function is Hermitian. An image of the non-Hermitian part of the data is a direct measure of the errors in the visibility data. The imaginary images show Gaussian distributions of pixel values with rms values that are in agreement with the noise estimate found by the previous method. The noise estimates from these two methods are presented for the individual maps in Table 4. Imaging frequencies, listed in order of increasing distance from line center. The imaging frequency resolution is coarser than the original channel spacing of the data. The image noise is estimated in two ways: method 1 involves measuring the rms in an image made from model-subtracted data. Method 2 is to find the rms in an imaginary image made from the data. TABLE 4 Center frequency Frequency offset from line center 0.00 MHz −4.62 MHz 4.62 MHz -9.23 MHz 9.23 MHz −13.8 MHz 13.9 MHz −18.4 MHz 18.5 MHz 66.0 MHz 213 MHz −0.937 GHz −1.06 GHz −4.94 GHz −5.06 GHz −6.09 GHz −6.21 GHz 230.538 GHz 230.533 GHz 230.543 GHz 230.529 GHz 230.547 GHz 230.524 GHz 230.552 GHz 230.520 GHz 230.556 GHz 230.604 GHz 230.751 GHz 229.601 GHz 229.476 GHz 225.600 GHz 225.475 GHz 224.450 GHz 224.325 GHz Image frequency width 4.6 MHz 4.6 MHz 4.6 MHz 4.6 MHz 4.6 MHz 4.6 MHz 4.6 MHz 4.6 MHz 4.6 MHz 125 MHz 125 MHz 125 MHz 125 MHz 125 MHz 125 MHz 125 MHz 125 MHz RMS, method 1 (mJy/beam) 28.2 28.6 27.8 27.9 28.7 26.7 29.1 27.7 26.9 8.13 7.64 8.39 8.57 7.58 7.21 7.41 7.44 RMS, method 2 (mJy/beam) 28.3 28.5 27.8 28.2 28.8 26.6 29.0 27.5 26.7 8.01 7.59 8.43 8.53 7.59 7.21 7.44 7.37 Deconvolution The imaging step is followed by deconvolution, which attempts to reconstruct the true sky brightness distribution from the observed image using the synthesized beam. Two different deconvolution algorithms are commonly used: an iterative point source subtraction algorithm, CLEAN which is well-matched for deconvolving compact source structures, and maximum entropy, a gradient search algorithm, which maximizes the fit to an a-priori image, in a least squares fit to the (u,v) data. After investigating both deconvolution strategies and several variations of CLEAN (Appendix C), we deconvolve our synthesized maps using the Clark CLEAN algorithm (Clark 1980) with a gain factor of 0.05, cleaning down to the rms noise level of the image. A starting CLEAN model is provided based on the radiative transfer solution for the nominal CO profile from Luszcz-Cook and de Pater (2013) (Section 3). We note that the resulting maps do not appear to be affected by the details of the starting CLEAN model. For a more complete comparison of the imaging and deconvolution strategies tried, see Appendix C. Averaging After the initial mapping procedure, we average deconvolved images where possible to further improve the signal-to-noise: the contribution function (Fig. 1) shows that at an offset of 5 GHz from line center, the maps are almost entirely due to continuum emission from pressures of 1-5 bar. We therefore average the four maps at offsets of 5-6 GHz from line center to produce a single continuum image (Fig. 3). We also combine the maps at 229.48 and 229.60 GHz (1.04 and 0.96 GHz from line center, respectively), giving us three high signal-to-noise images at offsets of 66 MHz, 213 MHz and 1 GHz from line center (Fig. 4). In the core of the CO line where we have an imaging resolution of 4.6 MHz, we average maps with the same absolute frequency offset from line center (Fig. 5). The contribution functions for these image pairs are very similar, so this allows us to increase our signal to noise while maintaining sensitivity to emission from different atmospheric pressures. The noise in each of these averaged maps is approximated as the root mean square sum of the errors in the original maps, divided by the square root of the number of input images. The higher of the two noise estimates for each input image (Table 4) is used. We note that averaging of images takes place after cleaning, which is a non-linear process. We also caution that systematic errors, for example those caused by gain calibration errors, will not decrease with more averaging. This can cause our errors to underestimate the true noise in the images. Therefore, the noise values derived for the final, averaged maps should be taken as best estimates. These values are presented in Table 2. Longitudinal brightness variations due to changes in the atmospheric properties should be averaged out in the long data integrations, but latitudinal variations may reflect meridional trends in the composition and/or temperature. To look for meaningful trends and further increase signal to noise, we bin the data in each map in bins of latitude. We use the ephemeris data from JPL Horizons10 to get the value of the latitude that each pixel location in the image would have if it were not convolved with the synthesized beam. To determine the variation of the intensity in the maps with physical location on the planet, we select 7 non-overlapping latitude bins; the width of each bin is approximately equal to one beam, such that data separated by at least one bin will be largely uncorrelated. For each latitude bin, we make a model mask: a pixel in the mask is set to 1 if the latitude at that pixel location is within the latitude bin range; otherwise it is set to 0. We then convolve the mask with the synthesized beam, and multiply this mask by the data. The total of this masked image divided by the number of pixels in the mask gives a weighted average of the data over the desired latitude range. The error for each binned point 10 http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?horizons 16 S. H. Luszcz-Cook, I. de Pater, M. Wright is estimated as the image noise in mJy/beam divided by the square root of the number of beams within the binned region, which varies from just over 1 beam for the bins centered at 80◦S and 40◦N, to nearly 6 beams in the bin centered at 20◦S. For direct comparison with the models, we convolve the models with the CLEAN beam and multiply by the same masks. COMPARISON OF DECONVOLUTION TECHNIQUES Neptune, with its smooth, bright disk and sharply defined edges, presents a challenge for imaging and deconvolution. In order to evaluate the effect and significance of our weighting function and deconvolution technique, we perform a series of comparisons using a subset of our data that spans 437.5 MHz in frequency, centered at 225.74 GHz (nearly 5 GHz from the center of the CO (2-1) line). These data represent an instance where there is overlap between the D-array data and all epochs of B-array data. To determine the importance of the short-spacing (D-array) data in the final maps, we imaged the B-array data separately, in addition to imaging the full combined data set. The synthesized maps from both data subsets are shown in Figs. 9 and 10, with three different weighting functions (natural, uniform and intermediate) applied. Natural weighting (top), which weights each visibility by the inverse of its noise variance, gives the best sensitivity, at the expense of the shape of the synthesized beam and sidelobe levels. Uniform weighting (middle) adjusts the weight of each visibility so that the density of visibilities is uniform across the (u,v) plane. This minimizes sidelobe levels, but increases the noise level in the map. Robust weighting with a Briggs visibility weighting robustness parameter (Briggs 1995) of 0.0 (bottom) is a good compromise between the two; maintaining a well-behaved beam shape with less increase to the noise level. Fig. 9. -- Synthesized images, B-array (long baseline) data only. Made using natural weighting (top), uniform weighting (middle) and robust weighting with a Briggs visibility weighting robustness parameter (Briggs 1995) of 0.0 (bottom). On the left we show the full maps; on the right we zoom in on the planet. The beam is indicated by the red oval in the bottom left corner of each image. We experimented with several deconvolution techniques; six of them are presented here. The results are summarized in Table 5 and shown in Figs. 11 - 14. f (a) Classical CLEAN no clean region: We used the CASA implementation of the Clark CLEAN routine with a gain factor of 0.05. A maximum of 100,000 iterations were permitted, unless a clean threshold of 8.6 mJy/beam was reached. This threshold was selected to be twice the measured rms for the synthesized map. We find that a significant amount of noise is cleaned, particularly in the case of the B-array data subset, for which a strong negative "clean bowl" is present due to the missing short spacing information. As a result, the residual map is artificially low, and only 3/4 of the total flux from the planet is recovered when only B-array data are included. (b) Classical CLEAN, inside a circle of radius 1.5": We restrict CLEAN to a circular region of radius 1.5", just outside of the planet. Since most of the flux within this region is source (not noise), we use a lower clean threshold of 4.3 mJy, equal to the measured rms of the map. This technique recovers more than 95% of the expected (model) flux from Neptune, even when the D-array data are not included. However, the noise outside of the CLEAN region is higher than in many of the other test methods, and the disk appears very 'lumpy' in the final CLEAN map, presumably because the flux is being reproduced by a set of point sources, which is unrealistic in the case of Neptune. 17 Fig. 10. -- Synthesized images, using all data (B and D arrays). Made using natural weighting (top), uniform weighting (middle) and robust weighting with a Briggs visibility weighting robustness parameter (Briggs 1995) of 0.0 (bottom). On the left we show the full maps; on the right we zoom in on the planet. The beam is indicated by the red oval in the bottom left corner of each image. TABLE 5 Comparison of deconvolution strategies. Algorithm Region Input model Threshold (a) CLEAN - (b) CLEAN 1.5" circle squared (c) CLEAN squared (d) CLEAN (e) MSCLEAN 2.5" circle (f) Max. entropy 1.5" circle - - nominal flat - - (mJy/beam) 8.6 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 B-array data only Fluxa RMSb (Jy) 9.10 11.56 12.62 10.88 13.34 12.44 (mJy/beam) 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.9 5.5 Full dataset NITERc Fluxa RMS NITERc 6810 8451 6477 11344 680 88 (Jy) 12.26 12.25 12.24 12.24 12.24 12.50 (mJy/beam) 2.0 2.0 1.4 1.6 2.0 6.2 2180 2579 9918 8168 628 71 aTotal flux recovered; nominal clean model gives a total flux of 12.740 Jy bstandard deviation of the full residual map cnumber of CLEAN or maximum entropy iterations performed dsquare extends just beyond the Neptune model disk- approximately 2.3" on a side (c) Classical CLEAN, starting with best-guess clean model: CLEAN is given a starting model, which is taken from our radiative transfer model described in Section 3. The input model uses 0.005" pixels that cover a square region that extends just beyond Neptune's limb. CLEAN then proceeds in the same way as before, adding additional point source components (both positive and negative) within the spatial range the starting model until the CLEAN threshold is reached. In general, we find this approach gives a good result: the noise is low across the map (even beyond the CLEAN region), and the disk appears far smoother than for the previous two techniques. (d) Classical CLEAN, starting with a flat clean model: To address the possibility that our choice of input model has an unexpected effect on the output map (perhaps forcing the data to match our nominal model), we repeat case (c) using a flat input model, which is a disk of constant intensity, equal to the lowest intensity value of the best guess model in (c). We find that without including the D-array data, some of the negative bowl from the missing short-spacing data remains with this technique, so that the measured flux from Neptune is low. However, when the D-array data are included, a flat input starting model produces a very similar map to the more detailed model in (c), and the noise properties of the map are similar for the two starting model cases. (e) Multiscale CLEAN: As an alternative to classical CLEAN we try the CASA implementation of multi-scale CLEAN. Rather than modeling the sky brightness with a set of point-sources, multi-scale CLEAN models the sky with components of several different size scales. For a 18 S. H. Luszcz-Cook, I. de Pater, M. Wright Fig. 11. -- Comparison of deconvolution techniques, for the B-array data only. Discussion of techniques (a)-(f) is given in Appendix C. For each technique, the deconvolved map (top) residual map (middle) and deconvolution model (bottom) are shown. The image size is the same as in Fig. 10, right. The deconvolution model is the model of the sky that includes any input (starting) model component plus the components determined by the deconvolution. The deconvolved map is the synthesized map, less the model convolved by the synthesized beam, plus the model convolved by a gaussian fit to the synthesized beam. The residual map is the synthesized map, less the model convolved by the synthesized beam. Fig. 12. -- Comparison of maps from deconvolution techniques (a)-(f), for the B-array data only. Plots are made by slicing horizontally through the center of the maps, and shown as relative pixel numbers, where the center pixel is at 0 (each pixel has a width of 0.09"). Also shown is our nominal model (black) for the data. In the bottom plot, we subtract the nominal model from each of the map slices. detailed comparison of the multi-scale CLEAN and traditional CLEAN algorithms, see Rich et al. (2008). We use a gain of 0.3; the threshold is set to 4.3 mJy. Five size scales are specified, ranging from a point source up to the diameter of Neptune. Since multi-scale CLEAN will only place model components such that they are entirely contained within the cleaning region, we specify a larger cleaning radius of 2.5". We find that multi-scale CLEAN is able to recover Neptune's flux even when the short spacing data were omitted. Multi-scale CLEAN also requires significantly fewer iterations to converge than classical CLEAN , and agrees well with (c) without depending at all on an input CLEAN model. However, the noise level outside of the cleaning region is somewhat higher than in (c) and (d). (f) Maximum Entropy: We use the mosmem routine in MIRIAD, which is an implementation of the Maximum Entropy Method (MEM). This algorithm, which is an alternative to CLEAN produces a smooth positive image which maximizes the fit to an a-priori image, in a least squares fit to the (u,v) data. We restrict the deconvolution to a circle of radius 1.5", and specify the total flux based on the expected value from the model. We allow for as many as 5000 iterations to reduce the image residuals to 4.3 mJy/beam. We found that mosmem converged quickly; however, this approach had the highest residual level of any of the methods we tried. From this comparison, we conclude that when the D-array (short baseline) data are included, there is no significant difference in the final maps from the different deconvolution methods. In particular, while a starting input CLEAN model appears to improve the appearance of the final maps, it does not artificially force the resulting maps to agree with the starting model, as long as the short baseline data are included. Table 5 lists the total flux densities in the maps. The maps produced using the full dataset produce a final flux density that is consistently lower than the model predicts. This result is consistent with the disk-integrated spectrum described in Luszcz-Cook and de 0200400600 mJy/beammodel(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)−40−2002040relative pixel #−100−5005019 Fig. 13. -- Same as Fig. 11, except for all data (B and D arrays). Fig. 14. -- Same as Fig. 12, except for all data (B and D arrays). Pater (2013), which indicates that at 225 GHz the model over-predicts Neptune's total flux. When we image only the B-array data, the use of a starting model is more influential, reducing the CLEAN bowl and increasing the total flux. As discussed in Appendix B.2, calibration errors and atmospheric fluctuations introduce amplitude and phase errors into the visibility data. The 'ringing' in the final maps is not an artifact of deconvolution, but is a result of these errors. This is supported by the fact that the rippling is observed in maps produced using both CLEAN and Maximum Entropy deconvolution methods, and is in fact observable in the synthesized images (prior to deconvolution). These ripples have an amplitude as high as 1 mJy/pixel, and the average deviation between map (c) and a smooth model (scaled to the data amplitude) is 5.7 mJy/beam. Since the maps are not overly influenced by the inclusion of an input model, the appearance of map (c) is best, and the residuals in case (c) are the lowest, we select method (c) for our image deconvolution. 0200400600 mJy/beammodel(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)−40−2002040relative pixel #−100−50050
1905.06035	1	1905	2019-05-15T08:59:12	Ground-based follow-up observations of TRAPPIST-1 transits in the near-infrared	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	The TRAPPIST-1 planetary system is a favorable target for the atmospheric characterization of temperate earth-sized exoplanets by means of transmission spectroscopy with the forthcoming James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). A possible obstacle to this technique could come from the photospheric heterogeneity of the host star that could affect planetary signatures in the transit transmission spectra. To constrain further this possibility, we gathered an extensive photometric data set of 25 TRAPPIST-1 transits observed in the near-IR J band (1.2 $\mu$m) with the UKIRT and the AAT, and in the NB2090 band (2.1 $\mu$m) with the VLT during the period 2015-2018. In our analysis of these data, we used a special strategy aiming to ensure uniformity in our measurements and robustness in our conclusions. We reach a photometric precision of $\sim0.003$ (RMS of the residuals), and we detect no significant temporal variations of transit depths of TRAPPIST-1 b, c, e, and g over the period of three years. The few transit depths measured for planets d and f hint towards some level of variability, but more measurements will be required for confirmation. Our depth measurements for planets b and c disagree with the stellar contamination spectra originating from the possible existence of bright spots of temperature 4500 K. We report updated transmission spectra for the six inner planets of the system which are globally flat for planets b and g and some structures are seen for planets c, d, e, and f.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Preprint 16 May 2019 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Ground-based follow-up observations of TRAPPIST-1 transits in the near-infrared A. Y. Burdanov,1(cid:63) S. M. Lederer2, M. Gillon1, L. Delrez3, E. Ducrot1, J. de Wit4, E. Jehin5, A. H. M. J. Triaud6, C. Lidman7, L. Spitler8,9, B.-O. Demory10, D. Queloz3 and V. Van Grootel5 1Astrobiology Research Unit, Universit´e de Li`ege, All´ee du 6 Aout 19C, 4000 Li`ege, Belgium 2NASA Johnson Space Center, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, TX 77058, USA 3Cavendish Laboratory, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0H3, UK 4Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 5Space Sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute, Universit´e de Li`ege, All´ee du 6 Aout 19C, 4000 Li`ege, Belgium 6School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK 7The Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, ACT 2601, Australia 8Research Centre for Astronomy, Astrophysics & Astrophotonics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 9Department of Physics & Astronomy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 10University of Bern, Center for Space and Habitability, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland Accepted 2019 May 14. Received 2019 May 9; in original form 2019 April 3 ABSTRACT The TRAPPIST-1 planetary system is a favorable target for the atmospheric charac- terization of temperate earth-sized exoplanets by means of transmission spectroscopy with the forthcoming James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). A possible obstacle to this technique could come from the photospheric heterogeneity of the host star that could affect planetary signatures in the transit transmission spectra. To constrain further this possibility, we gathered an extensive photometric data set of 25 TRAPPIST-1 transits observed in the near-IR J band (1.2 µm) with the UKIRT and the AAT, and in the NB2090 band (2.1 µm) with the VLT during the period 2015-2018. In our analysis of these data, we used a special strategy aiming to ensure uniformity in our measurements and robustness in our conclusions. We reach a photometric precision of ∼ 0.003 (RMS of the residuals), and we detect no significant temporal variations of transit depths of TRAPPIST-1 b, c, e, and g over the period of three years. The few transit depths measured for planets d and f hint towards some level of variability, but more measurements will be required for confirmation. Our depth measurements for planets b and c disagree with the stellar contamination spectra originating from the possible existence of bright spots of temperature 4500 K. We report updated transmis- sion spectra for the six inner planets of the system which are globally flat for planets b and g and some structures are seen for planets c, d, e, and f. techniques: methods: data analysis -- techniques: photometric -- stars: Key words: individual: TRAPPIST-1 -- planets and satellites: atmospheres -- infrared: planetary systems -- infrared: stars. 9 1 0 2 y a M 5 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 5 3 0 6 0 . 5 0 9 1 : v i X r a 1 INTRODUCTION TRAPPIST-1 is a ∼ 0.09M(cid:12) ultracool dwarf star 12.4 pc away in the Aquarius constellation (Gizis et al. 2000; Van Grootel et al. 2018). Photometric monitoring revealed that it (cid:63) E-mail: [email protected] © 2019 The Authors hosts a compact resonant system composed of seven transit- ing Earth-sized planets (Gillon et al. 2016; Gillon et al. 2017; Luger et al. 2017). Dynamical modeling of this system based on timing variations of its planets' transits resulted in strong constraints on the planetary masses which, when combined with the radii measured from transits, point toward rocky compositions with sizable volatile contents (Grimm et al. 2 A. Burdanov et al. 2018). With stellar irradiations ranging from 0.1 to 4 times solar, these seven planets can be qualified as "temperate", and three of them (planets e, f, and g) orbit within the "hab- itable zone" of the host star (Gillon et al. 2017). Due to the combination of relatively large infrared brightness (J ∼ 11.4, H ∼ 10.7, K ∼ 10.3) and the small size (∼ 0.12R(cid:12)) of their host star, the TRAPPIST-1 plan- ets are especially favorable targets for the detailed explo- ration of their atmospheres with the future ground-based extremely large telescopes and James Webb Space Tele- scope (JWST) (Rodler & L´opez-Morales 2014; Barstow & Irwin 2016; Gillon et al. 2017; Morley et al. 2017; Lincowski et al. 2018). First reconnaissance observations with the Hub- ble Space Telescope (HST) by de Wit et al. (2016, 2018) showed no hint of clear H/He dominated atmospheres for the six inner planets. Further studies reassessed these findings: Moran et al. (2018) supported the presence of secondary volatile-rich atmospheres for planets d, e and f using revised masses (while not entirely ruling out a cloud-free H-rich at- mosphere for TRAPPIST-1 e and f) and Wakeford et al. (2019) ruled out a clear solar H2/He dominated atmosphere for TRAPPIST-1 g. A possible obstacle on the way for a proper and ro- bust characterization of the atmospheres of the TRAPPIST- 1 planets was presented by Apai et al. (2018) and Rackham et al. (2018), who argue that the photospheric heterogeneity of the host star, and specifically spots and faculae, could al- ter, hide, or even mimic planetary signatures in the transit transmission spectra. Taking into account this possible stel- lar contamination, and basing their re-analysis on existing HST near-IR data, Zhang et al. (2018) predicted consider- able changes of the transit depths of TRAPPIST-1 planets with wavelength. Work by Ducrot et al. (2018) disproved these predictions by producing featureless broadband trans- mission spectra for the planets in the 0.8-4.5 µm spectral range, and showing an absence of significant temporal varia- tions of the transit depths in the visible. Furthermore, Delrez et al. (2018) showed that the 3.3 d periodic 1% photometric modulation detected in the K2 optical data set (Luger et al. 2017) is not present in Spitzer 4.5 µm observations, and that transit depth measurements do not show any hint of a significant stellar contamination in this spectral range. The same conclusion was reached by Morris et al. (2018b) using a "self-contamination" approach based on the measurement of transit egress and ingress durations from the same Spitzer data set. Based on the presence of a 3.3 d photometric variability in K2 data and its absence in Spitzer mid-IR data, Mor- ris et al. (2018a) proposed that the photospheric inhomo- geneities of TRAPPIST-1 could be dominated by a few fac- ulae (i.e. bright spots) with characteristic temperatures in excess of ∼ 1800 K relative to the effective temperature of the star (∼ 2500 K). This is globally consistent with the analysis of Rackham et al. (2018) and Zhang et al. (2018) who inferred whole-disk spot and faculae coverage fractions of ∼10 and ∼ 50% respectively, but with a much lower tem- perature excess of (∼ 500K) for the faculae. According to Ducrot et al. (2018), their analyses favor two scenarios of TRAPPIST-1 photosphere: with a prevalence of a several high-latitude cold and large spots, or alternatively, a few hot and small spots. Globally, all these studies do not yet present a consis- tent picture of the photospheric properties of TRAPPSIT-1, even at the observational level. For instance, the 1.1-1.7 µm combined transmission spectra presented by Ducrot et al. (2018) do not show any significant features, while the spec- tra obtained by Zhang et al. (2018) from the very same HST data set shows a drop around 1.4 µm attributed by the authors to an inverted water absorption feature caused by stellar contamination. Both studies agree that the HST transit depths are globally deeper than those measured at other wavelengths. Nevertheless, as outlined by Ducrot et al. (2018), the origins of these larger transit depths could be in- strumental, as the HST/WFC3 systematic effects combined with the low-Earth orbit of HST make it very difficult to nor- malize transit light curves as short as those of TRAPPIST-1 planets (see Subsection 3.2 in Ducrot et al. 2018). The uncer- tainties affecting the absolute values of the transits measured by HST in the near-IR is unfortunate, as this spectral range encompasses the peak of the spectral energy distribution of TRAPPIST-1 (see Fig. 3 in Morris et al. 2018a) and could bring strong constraints on the photospheric properties of TRAPPIST-1 and on the impact of stellar contamination to be expected for upcoming JWST observations of the planets. As Earth's atmosphere is partially transparent in near-IR, it is therefore highly desirable to observe as many transits of TRAPPIST-1 planets as possible in this spectral range at high precision with ground-based telescopes. In this paper, we present an extensive photometric data set of 25 TRAPPIST-1 transits gathered in the near-IR J band (1.2 µm) with the 3.8-m United Kingdom Infra-Red Telescope (UKIRT) and the 3.9-m Anglo-Australian Tele- scope (AAT), and in the NB2090 band (2.1 µm) with the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT) during the period 2015- 2018. In our analysis of these data, we used a special strat- egy (see Subsections 3.2 and 3.3) aiming to ensure unifor- mity in our measurements and robustness in our conclusions. This special attention is motivated by the inherent com- plexity of ground-based near-IR data reduction appearing as correlations of deduced transit depths with photometric aperture sizes and comparison stars (for a comprehensive review of this topic see Croll et al. 2015). We also report precise timings of each transit that should further constrain the masses of the planets via the transit-timing variations method (Gillon et al. 2017; Grimm et al. 2018). The rest of the paper is divided into four sections. First, we describe our observational data set in Section 2. Section 3 is devoted to the reduction and analysis of these data. We present and discuss our results in Section 4, and we outline our findings in the Conclusions section. 2 INSTRUMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS We acquired more than 30 transits of TRAPPIST-1 planets with UKIRT, VLT, and AAT in the period from December 2015 to July 2018 through different observing programs (see Acknowledgements section for a full list of programs). For our analysis, we considered only 25 transits which satisfied the following two conditions: (1) isolated transits, i.e. not blended with the transit of another planet, and (2) taken under relatively good observing conditions, meaning trans- parency variations in the Earth's atmosphere were less than MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Ground-based follow-up of TRAPPIST-1 in the near-IR 3 2.2 VLT/HAWK-I We used the HAWK-I cryogenic wide-field imager installed on Unit Telescope 4 (Yepun) of the ESO VLT at Paranal observatory to observe transits of TRAPPIST-1 b and c in 2015 and 2017. The HAWK-I imager is composed of four 2048 × 2048 Hawaii 2RG chips (Siebenmorgen et al. 2011). Each chip provides an image scale of 0.106 arcsec pixel−1 re- sulting in a 217× 217 arcsec2 FoV. TRAPPIST-1 was placed in the corner of the quadrant Q3 (chip #79) to allow three additional stars to be simultaneously imaged on the chip for use as comparison stars. Non-Destructive Read (NDR) was used with a 3 second exposure time and 12 sub-integrations. All transits were observed in narrow-band filter NB2090 which has a central wavelength of 2.095 µm and width of 0.020 µm. The small width of this filter minimizes the effect of differential extinction, while the combination of its central wavelength and bandwidth eliminates large absorption and emission bands present in the K band2. 2.3 AAT/IRIS2 We observed two transits of TRAPPIST-1 b with the IRIS2 IR-imager installed on the AAT 4-m telescope at the Sid- ing Spring Observatory. IRIS2 IR-imager consists of one 1024 × 1024 Rockwell Hawaii-II detector which has a FoV of 7.7 × 7.7 arcmin2 and a pixel scale of 0.45 arcsec pixel−1 (Tinney et al. 2004). We used 9 second exposure times and observations were done in the J band. The telescope was pointed in such a way as to prevent TRAPPIST-1 and com- parison stars from falling in the upper right quadrant of IRIS2, which had excessive noise. 3 DATA REDUCTION AND ANALYSIS In this section, we describe the entire data handling pro- cess which consisted of a preliminary reduction of the im- ages, photometric extraction of the stellar fluxes, perform- ing differential photometry, and deducing transit parame- ters with the use of an adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) code (Gillon et al. 2012, 2014). Each transit was first analysed individually to obtain its parameters and to search for possible temporal variability (subsection 3.3). For each planet, global MCMC analyses of all the transits were then performed (section 3.4), although separately for each filter. 3.1 Image calibrations 3.1.1 UKIRT/WFCAM All images obtained with the UKIRT telescope were pre-processed by the Cambridge Astronomy Survey Unit (CASU) and then were downloaded from the WFCAM Sci- ence Archive (WSA). Reduction steps completed by CASU include: dark-correction, flat-fielding, gain-correction and 2 https://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/paranal/ instruments/hawki/inst.html Figure 1. Distribution of the TRAPPIST-1 planet transits ana- lyzed in this work. 30%. The distribution of these 25 transits among the differ- ent TRAPPIST-1 planets is shown in Fig. 1. All transits were observed in "staring mode", i.e. with- out dithering of the telescope. However, before and af- ter the scientific sequence, sky flat images were acquired with dithering to construct a proper master sky flat image. An observing log is presented in Table 1, and we outline instrument-specific information below. 2.1 UKIRT/WFCAM The WFCAM near-IR imager of the UKIRT 3.8-meter tele- scope located on the summit of Mauna Kea was used to ob- serve transits of TRAPPIST-1 b, c, d, e, f and g in the broad- band J filter1. Those observations occurred between 2015 and 2018. The WFCAM imager consists of four 2048 × 2048 Rockwell Hawaii-II detectors with a field of view (FoV) of 13.65 × 13.65 arcmin2 each and image scale of 0.4 arc- sec pixel−1 (Casali et al. 2007). TRAPPIST-1 was placed in quadrant 3 (array ID number #76) as this is the cleanest of the four detectors. Observations were made in Correlated Double Sampling (CDS) mode which is the default read mode used for all broad-band observations. These observations comprised co- adding five x 1-second exposures throughout the undithered scientific sequence. The sequence was extended long enough - 1 to 2.5 hours on each side of the transit, depending upon how well known the orbital period of the target planet's transit was known - to ensure that a pre- and post-transit, star-only baseline was acquired. For example, a 1 h tran- sit of planet f, plus 1.5 h to capture the baseline out-of- transit prior to and following the transit, resulted in a 4 h total undithered scientific sequence. The dithered sky flat se- quence before and after each full scientific transit sequence was composed of capturing five x 1-second co-added expo- sures throughout the 2.5 min sequence. 1 http://casu.ast.cam.ac.uk/surveys-projects/wfcam/ technical/filter-set MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) bcdefghPlanet0246810Number of transits4 A. Burdanov et al. Table 1. Observing log: observations are grouped by planets and sorted chronologically in each group. ID Date of start of the night Planet Telescope/Instrum. Filter Duration 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2015 Nov 07 2015 Dec 05 2015 Dec 08 2016 Jul 29 2016 Aug 01 2016 Oct 17 2016 Oct 20 2017 Jul 07 2017 Nov 30 2018 Jul 06 2015 Dec 06 2016 Jul 18 2016 Jul 30 2017 Nov 21 2017 Aug 16 2017 Aug 20 2017 Oct 28 2017 Sep 11 2018 Jul 13 2017 Jul 31 2017 Sep 15 2017 Oct 22 2017 Sep 02 2017 Dec 10 2018 Jun 13 b b b b b b b b b b c c c c d d d e e f f f g g g VLT/HAWK-I NB2090 UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM AAT/IRIS2 AAT/IRIS2 UKIRT/WFCAM J J J J J J J VLT/HAWK-I NB2090 UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM J J J J VLT/HAWK-I NB2090 UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM J J J J J J J J J J J ∼ 4.0 h ∼ 3.5 h ∼ 3.6 h ∼ 5.6 h ∼ 3.2 h ∼ 3.7 h ∼ 3.4 h ∼ 2.0 h ∼ 2.8 h ∼ 1.8 h ∼ 3.8 h ∼ 4.9 h ∼ 3.3 h ∼ 3.1 h ∼ 3.0 h ∼ 3.0 h ∼ 2.9 h ∼ 2.4 h ∼ 2.9 h ∼ 3.8 h ∼ 3.2 h ∼ 3.9 h ∼ 5.0 h ∼ 3.5 h ∼ 2.6 h Exposure time (N×EXP)b 12×3.0 s 3×2.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 1×9.0 s 1×9.0 s 5×1.0 s 12×3.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 12×3.1 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s 5×1.0 s Sky transparencya Remarks Clear Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Photometric Thin cirrus Photometric Thin cirrus Photometric Photometric Photometric - - Partial - - 9 min gap during bottom Airmass >2 from 7682.13 Short OOTc , gap during egress - Short OOT, gap before engress - - - - Short gaps during egress and bottom Short gap during bottom - Short gap after egress - - Short gap before ingress - - - Short OOT, gap during ingress a According to the ESO definitions (https://www.eso.org/sci/observing/phase2/ObsConditions.html) b N is the number of exposures and EXP is the individual exposure times c out-of-transit observations decurtaining (a specific correction for WFCAM3 data). No linearity correction was applied as the system is linear to < 1% up to the saturation regime4 (∼ 40 000 counts/pixel) and maximum counts on TRAPPIST-1, which was the brightest star in the FoV, never exceeded 15 000 counts. Then the values of the bad pixels (deviating by 3σ when classified as background sky values and 40σ for stars, where σ is sky background noise) were replaced with the median values of the neighbouring pixels. 3 http://casu.ast.cam.ac.uk/surveys-projects/wfcam/ technical/decurtaining 4 http://casu.ast.cam.ac.uk/surveys-projects/wfcam/ technical/linearity 3.1.2 VLT/HAWK-I Raw scientific images and corresponding processed calibra- tion images were downloaded from the ESO archive. Be- fore preliminary data reduction, sub-images from quadrant Q3 were extracted, and all subsequent steps were performed only for quadrant Q3. We used only one quadrant as using reference stars located on other chips reduces photometric precision (Lendl et al. 2013). This also minimized compu- tational time for data reduction. Processed calibration files from the ESO archive were used for dark and flat field correc- tions with the PyRAF/ccdproc5 module. Then we followed 5 http://stsdas.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/gethelp.cgi?ccdproc MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Ground-based follow-up of TRAPPIST-1 in the near-IR 5 the same procedure outlined for the UKIRT data to deal with the bad pixels. As with UKIRT data, no linearity cor- rection was applied because the detector is linear to < 1% below 30 000 counts and maximum counts on TRAPPIST-1 were below 20 000. 3.1.3 AAT/IRIS2 All the images from AAT were treated similarly to the data from VLT except for the manual creation of the master dark and flat images. 3.2 Photometric extraction After the preliminary reduction steps described above, we applied the subsequent procedures to the data from all the telescopes. All images of each observing run were aligned with respect to the first image of the run (typical X and Y shifts were less than 1-2 pixels). Then we created a me- dian stacked image from all the aligned images to run a star identification algorithm. Positions of the stars on the stacked image were identified with intensity-weighted cen- troids. Then we extracted fluxes of the stars on each image with eight different circular apertures, sky buffers, and sky annuli using DAOPHOT (Tody 1986). Aperture sizes were defined as 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6× FWHM, where FWHM is the mean full width at half maximum of the star's point spread function (PSF) in the image. For each star, the sky back- ground was measured in an annulus beyond the stellar aper- ture using the median sky fitting algorithm implemented in PyRAF/DAOPHOT. Radius of the annulus was defined as 3× FWHM, and its width as 5× FWHM. At that stage, differential photometry was carried out using a custom-made code: for all apertures, a given target star T and a list of comparison stars (C1, C2,, etc...), we computed the ratio FT/(FC1 +FC2 +...) for each image, where F is the flux of a star corrected for the sky background. We derived photometric uncertainties with the use of a "CCD equation" (Howell 2006) taking into account dark current, read-out noise, stellar scintillation and sky Poisson noise. At first, we followed the approach to differential pho- tometry and transit light curve analysis that is generally used for ground-based transit photometry obtained in the visible (Ducrot et al. 2018). The best aperture size and com- bination of comparison stars were selected on the basis of the minimization of the out-of-transit (OOT) scatter of the light curve. Similar to other scientists dealing with near-IR ground-based observations, we found out that this approach is not optimal as it appears to induce correlations of tran- sit depths deduced from the MCMC analysis with aperture size and with the used comparison stars (see Croll et al. 2015 and Clark et al. 2018). While the exact sources of these correlations are unknown, we suspect that more likely they are coming from a combination of these factors: brightness and color differences of the TRAPPIST-1 and reference stars (the target star is the brightest and the reddest star in the FoV while reference stars are fainter and much bluer); spa- tial separation of the target and reference stars on the sky and on the detector, which make effects of the detector sys- tematics and of the Earth's atmosphere display themselves differently for the target and reference stars. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) We found that different combinations of the reference stars and aperture sizes can be equally good in terms of the OOT scatter, but give significantly different transit depths for a given observing run. Thus, if such an approach is ap- plied to the entire TRAPPIST-1 data set, then one can not truly discriminate temporal variations of the transit depths caused by this near-IR photometry effect, or caused by phys- ical stellar contamination coming from the star, e.g., from unocculted star spots, or caused by some other astrophysi- cal process. Therefore, selection of the photometric aperture size and suitable comparison stars is a non-trivial and impor- tant step. In the next section, we describe how we rigorously approached our analysis to yield credible and robust tran- sit depths, as well as transit timings, durations and impact parameters. 3.3 Individual analysis One way to robustly determine output metrics is to begin by producing a large set of differential light curves for each transit, based on different combinations of apertures and comparison stars. Each light curve within this set is then analyzed with the MCMC code and the metric RMS× β2 r (proposed by Croll et al. 2015) calculated for each. Only those combinations whose output metric meet the criteria of RMS× β2 the minimum metric) are selected. r]min (less than 15% above r < 1.15 × [RMS × β2 Here RMS is the root mean square of the photometric residuals after the subtraction of the transit best-fit model and βr is a quantitative factor used to assess the amount of red (correlated) noise in our time-series (Winn et al. 2008). After this selection is done, posterior probability distribu- tion functions (PDFs) from the MCMC runs of the selected light curves are combined for each transit parameter. Use of this metric allows us to find a proper balance between small aperture radii, which tend to produce the smallest RMS, and large aperture radii, which minimizes the time- correlated noise (βr ∼ 1). For our MCMC analyses, we used the quadratic limb- darkening (LD) law coefficients u1 and u2 with a normal prior distributions. LD coefficients values and corresponding uncertainties were interpolated from the paper by Claret et al. (2012). Respective values for J band were u1 = 0.19 ± 0.04 and u2 = 0.50 ± 0.12, and for the NB2090 band -- u1 = 0.23 ± 0.05 and u2 = 0.33 ± 0.08. Each transiting light curve was modeled using the model by Mandel & Agol (2002) multiplied by a baseline polyno- mial model aiming to account for the correlation of the mea- sured fluxes with the variations of external parameters such as the x- and y-drift of the stars on a chip due to imperfect telescope tracking, FWHM, time, airmass, sky background values, etc. For each observing run, we first selected a base- line model by running a relatively short chain of MCMC with 10 000 steps with different combinations of external parame- ters on a limited set of light curves which were, in their turn, obtained with varying combinations of comparison stars and aperture sizes. A model giving the minimum Bayesian Infor- mation Criterion (BIC, Schwarz 1978) was selected, and this model worked efficiently for all the light curves within one observing night. Typically, accounting for the drift of the positions of the stars, for sky background variations, and FWHM changes decreased the BIC significantly. Selected 6 A. Burdanov et al. Table 2. Details of TRAPPIST-1 transit light curve analyses. Baseline function is a polynomial of time (t), mean FWHM of the star's PSF in the image ( f whm), position of the star on the CCD (xy), airmass (A) and/or sky background (sky). The epoch is calculated using the transit ephemeris reported in Delrez et al. (2018) ID Planet Telescope/Instrum. Filter Number of points Epoch Baseline . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 b b b b b b b b b b c c c c d d d e e f f f g g g VLT/HAWK-I NB2090 UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM AAT/IRIS2 AAT/IRIS2 UKIRT/WFCAM J J J J J J J VLT/HAWK-I NB2090 UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM J J J J VLT/HAWK-I NB2090 UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM UKIRT/WFCAM J J J J J J J J J J J 195 880 1107 1558 898 1211 1916 584 152 516 1148 1451 1003 169 832 866 886 697 832 1123 822 950 1468 1057 715 8 26 28 183 185 236 238 410 507 651 33 126 131 329 77 78 95 57 107 32 37 41 27 35 50 t2 + f whm2 + xy2 t3 + sky2 + xy1 t1 + f whm1 + sky3 + xy1 t2 + f whm1 + xy2 t2 + f whm3 + xy1 t2 + f whm3 + xy3 t2 + f whm3 + sky1 + xy3 t2 + f whm4 + sky1 + xy1 t3 + f whm2 + sky1 + xy2 t1 + f whm1 + xy1 + sky2 t2 + f whm2 + xy1 + sky1 t2 + f whm2 + sky2 + xy2 t4 + f whm2 + xy1 t2 + f whm2 + sky2 + xy4 t2 + f whm2 + xy2 t2 + A2 + f whm1 + xy1 + sky1 t2 + f whm2 + xy1 + sky2 t2 + f whm2 + xy2 + sky1 t2 + f whm3 + xy2 t3 + f whm3 + xy2 f whm1 + xy2 t2 + f whm2 + xy2 + sky2 t2 + f whm2 + xy2 t2 + f whm4 + xy2 A2 + f whm3 + xy2 baseline functions for each observing run are presented in Table 2. For each light curve of every observing run, we allowed the following parameters to vary (jump parameters): the mid-transit time T0; the ratio of the planet's and star's areas (Rp/R(cid:63))2, where the planetary radius is Rp and the stellar radius is R(cid:63); the transit width W (duration from the first to last contact); the impact parameter b(cid:48) = a cos ip/R(cid:63) as- suming circular orbit, where a is the semi-major axis and ip is the orbital inclination; the combinations c1 = 2u1 + u2 and c2 = u1 − 2u2 where u1 and u2 are the quadratic limb- darkening coefficients. The orbital period for each planet was kept fixed to the values presented in Delrez et al. (2018). Uniform non-informative prior distributions were assumed for all jump parameters. TRAPPIST-1's effective tempera- ture Teff = 2516 ± 41 K, its mass M(cid:63) = 0.089 ± 0.006 M(cid:12) and its metallicity [Fe/H]= 0.04 ± 0.08 were applied from Van Grootel et al. (2018) with normal prior distributions. For every transit observation, we formed differential light curves using all possible combinations of the compari- son stars and aperture sizes. Typically, there were 5-6 suit- able comparison stars, and with eight apertures, it produced 400-500 individual light curves for a given transit. However, in the case of VLT data, we had just two suitable reference stars. For each light curve, we ran MCMC with 40 000 steps to estimate a best-fit value for the metric RMS× β2 r , to se- lect light curves and to compute correction factors CF to rescale photometric error bars (see Gillon et al. 2012 for the details). Then for each best light curve, an MCMC model with two chains of 100 000 steps were executed with cor- rection factors. We controlled the convergence of the chains by applying the statistical test of Gelman & Rubin (1992) and checking that it was less than 1.11 for each jump pa- rameter. Posterior PDFs derived from the analysis of these selected light curves were combined afterward for each tran- sit parameter. Our MCMC simulations were parallelized and were done with the use of the Consortium des ´Equipements de Calcul Intensif (C´ECI) computing center. Transit depths, timings, durations and impact param- eters deduced from our analysis are shown in Table 3 and transit depths are discussed in the Results and Discussion section. We plot individual transit depths in Fig. 2. By using the approach of combining PDFs of the light curves selected basing on the RMS× β2 r metric for every transit, our errors on transit depths tend to increase com- pared to the analysis of a single 'best' light curve. But this approach gave robust estimates of the transit depths, which is critical in the assessment of their temporal variability and associated possible stellar contamination. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Ground-based follow-up of TRAPPIST-1 in the near-IR 7 Table 3. Results of the individual analyses: median values of the posterior PDFs and their respective 1-σ limits derived for the timing T0 , depth dF, duration W and impact parameter b for each transit. ID Planet Epoch Filter T0 (BJDTDB -- 2450000) σT0 dF σd F (per cent) W (min) σW b σb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 b b b b b b b b b b c c c c d d d e e f f f g g g 8 26 28 183 185 236 238 410 507 651 33 126 131 329 77 78 95 57 107 32 37 41 27 35 50 NB2090 J J J J J J J NB2090 J J J J NB2090 J J J J J J J J J J J 7334.59940 7361.79958 7364.82184 7599.00621 7602.02813 7679.08274 7682.10451 7941.97621 8088.53133 8306.10046 7362.72643 7587.95740 7600.06699 8079.58054 7981.98734 7986.03382 8054.87480 8008.03130 8313.02465 7966.01321 8012.04130 8048.86235 7998.88349 8097.72511 8283.05268 0.00062 0.00041 0.00076 0.00052 0.00036 0.00019 0.00022 0.00038 0.00056 0.00025 0.00034 0.00050 0.00047 0.00045 0.00085 0.00050 0.00048 0.00062 0.00035 0.00042 0.00081 0.00026 0.00056 0.00031 0.00093 0.696 0.710 0.717 0.707 0.698 0.733 0.703 0.648 0.691 0.725 0.653 0.625 0.612 0.606 0.499 0.316 0.408 0.522 0.555 0.722 0.572 0.807 0.746 0.774 0.771 0.074 0.063 0.065 0.063 0.046 0.037 0.034 0.049 0.074 0.042 0.037 0.056 0.070 0.106 0.058 0.039 0.044 36.56 37.38 35.68 36.34 37.00 36.87 34.46 35.49 35.67 36.02 41.69 41.94 42.20 42.28 48.99 47.88 50.18 0.052 0.034 56.03 56.80 0.046 0.053 0.038 0.048 0.037 0.111 61.76 62.08 62.04 69.96 70.57 69.14 1.38 1.11 1.84 1.20 1.00 0.61 0.72 0.43 1.28 0.38 1.00 0.98 1.24 1.16 0.42 1.33 1.28 0.42 1.04 1.29 0.42 0.39 1.51 1.10 0.43 0.17 0.18 0.26 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.28 0.32 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.18 0.22 0.23 0.15 0.20 0.18 0.41 0.31 0.35 0.32 0.29 0.37 0.12 0.11 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.12 3.4 Global analysis For each planet, we ran a global MCMC analysis of all the transits to check the consistency of the transits depths from the individual MCMC analysis. We used only one light curve from the set of all light curves selected for each transit obser- vation. Said light curve's median value of the posterior PDF for the transit depth was the closest to the median value ob- tained from the combination of all the PDFs deduced from the set of best light curves for a particular transit. These light curves are presented in Appendix A1 along with cor- responding RMS versus bin size plots made with the MC3 software (Cubillos et al. 2017) to assess the amount of corre- lated (red) noise in our time-series. The global analysis was performed for each planet in each filter -- TRAPPIST-1 b-g in J band and TRAPPIST-1 b in NB2090 band. We note that there is only one transit of planet c in NB2090 band. Jump parameters were the same as for the individual analyses (see Subsection 3.3), but with an addition of a Tran- sit Timing Variation (TTV) for each transit. Period P and initial transit epoch T0 were fixed to the values from Delrez et al. (2018). Thus there were seven common parameters for all transits (stellar parameters including LD coefficients + transit impact parameter b) and two individual parameters for each transit (dF and TTV). We used the same photo- metric baselines that were applied in the individual analy- ses. First, we ran MCMC with 10 000 steps to estimate the MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) correction factors, CF, and then two chains of 100 000 steps with 20% burn-in phase were executed to derive the transit parameters. Their convergence was checked as well with the test of Gelman & Rubin. Deduced transit depths are pre- sented in Table 4 and detrended phase-folded light curves for each planet and bandpass are presented in Fig. 3. 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Transit depths variability To assess how transit depths change from epoch to epoch, for each planet we compared the depths inferred from the indi- vidual analyses with the one measured from the global anal- ysis of all transits (see Table 3 and Table 4, respectively). We conclude that the individual transit depths of TRAPPIST- 1 b, c, e, and g are consistent with the values deduced from the global analysis at better than 1-σ, and that the maxi- mum standard deviation of the measured individual transit depth does not exceed 260 ppm (the case of TRAPPIST-1 b, where the depth inferred from light curve #8 could deviate the most because of a data gap during the egress and a short OOT baseline which prevents us from properly mod- elling the systematic effects during the observing run). We note that our initial standard deviation of the measured in- dividual transit depth of planet b, which was obtained using 8 A. Burdanov et al. Figure 2. Transit depths measured individually for each transit. Values are displayed chronologically, but not linearly in time. The horizontal black line shows the median value of the transit depth posterior PDF inferred from the global analysis with 1-σ and 2-σ intervals shown in shades of grey with numerical values on the right. The dotted line represents the same transit depth from the global Spitzer data analysis in the thermal-IR 4.5 µm range (Delrez et al. 2018). a classical approach to differential photometry by minimiza- tion of the OOT RMS, was 1000 ppm. However, even with a rigorous approach, transit depths of TRAPPIST-1 d and f show temporal variations from epoch to epoch, with peak- to-peak values of 1800 ppm, and 2400 ppm, respectively, and standard deviations are larger than the mean errors. We note that there are only three transits for planets d and f, the two that appear to have noticeable temporal vari- ations (Ducrot et al. (2018) also reports temporal variations of planet d basing on 10 transits from K2 ). In the case of planet d, all transit observations were done in photometric conditions, but the first transit (light curve #15) has larger error bars than the others, most likely because of a data gap during an egress. Another transit of TRAPPIST-1 d suffered from a short data gap in the bottom part (light curve #16). In each case, after resuming the observations, the telescope pointing held, holding all the stars within 1 pixel from their initial positions, but gaps during the ingress/egress could affect transit shapes, which could affect our deduced transit depths. A similar situation can be seen during a transit of planet b (above-mentioned light curve #8), where a data gap is also present during an egress. However in the case of a transit of planet g (light curve #25) data gap during ingress and short OOT baseline are also present, but the deduced transit depth is consistent with previous measure- ments (light curves #23 and #24). In the case of planet f, the first transit was observed in thin cirrus conditions (light curve #20), the second transit shows a possible spot-crossing event (light curve #21) and the third transit suffered from thin cirrus before the ingress (light curve #22). All tran- sits of TRAPPIST-1 d and f were observed with UKIRT in J band with the same instrumental setup. As precipitable water vapour (PWV) has drastic influence on the opacity of Earth's atmosphere in the near-IR and thus impacts near-IR photometry, we checked each observing night for the amount of PWV6 and we could not find any correlations between deduced transits depths and the amount of PWV. Besides possible effect of thin cirrus clouds, we could not attribute transit variations in depth to other external factors, such as the position of the star on the chip, mean FWHM, time, air- mass or sky background values or any combination of these. Thus we conclude that for now our apparent high scatter of transit depths for planets d and f likely originate from the effects of the data gaps, thin cirrus or the spot-crossing event. Interestingly, all transits of TRAPPIST-1 d and f in the near-IR were obtained in one observing season dur- ing Summer and Autumn of 2017. Some of the transits of TRAPPIST-1 b, c, e, and g were also obtained in the same season, but their values are consistent with observa- tions made in other seasons. In Fig. 4 we display the ratio of an individual transit depth to the average transit depth inferred from the global analysis for each planet as a func- tion of Julian Date. If the scatter noticed for planets d and f originated from a maximum of the star's magnetic cycle in 2017, we would expect the transits of the other planets to have been affected too. The fact that it was not the case argues against this hypothesis. All our observations were centered only on transit win- dows with the longest observing window lasting 5 h which makes it hard to properly sample the rotational period of the star, reported to be ∼3.3 d basing on the K2 data (Luger et al. 2017). However, this period could be a characteris- tic timescale of active regions (Morris et al. 2018a). In any case, more transit observations of TRAPPIST-1 planets, es- pecially of planets d and f, and frequent photometric mon- itoring of the host star are needed to confirm astrophysical origin and understand the real cause of transit depth varia- tions of TRAPPIST-1 d and f. 6 http://www.eao.hawaii.edu/weather/watervapor/mk/ archive/ MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Ground-based follow-up of TRAPPIST-1 in the near-IR 9 Table 4. Transit depths from the global analyses: median values of the posterior PDFs and their respective 1-σ limits. Planet TRAPPIST-1 b TRAPPIST-1 c TRAPPIST-1 d TRAPPIST-1 e TRAPPIST-1 f TRAPPIST-1 g dFJ (per cent) 0.700 ± 0.023 0.641 ± 0.034 0.387 ± 0.029 0.550 ± 0.029 0.759 ± 0.031 0.758 ± 0.030 dFNB2090 (per cent) 0.688 ± 0.05 0.618 ± 0.04 - - - - Table 5. Standard deviations and mean errors of the transit depths from the individual analyses. Planet Filter σ (per cent) Mean error (per cent) J TRAPPIST-1 b TRAPPIST-1 b NB2090 TRAPPIST-1 c TRAPPIST-1 d TRAPPIST-1 e TRAPPIST-1 f TRAPPIST-1 g J J J J J 0.026 0.004 0.021 0.091 0.023 0.119 0.015 0.050 0.074 0.054 0.047 0.043 0.046 0.066 Figure 3. Period-folded transits of TRAPPIST-1 b-g planets multiplied by the baseline polynomials, and corrected for TTVs. Individual measurements are presented in colored circles and white circles are 7 min binned values. The solid black line repre- sents the best-fit model. 4.2 Updated transmission spectra and stellar contamination We updated the transmission spectra of TRAPPIST-1 b-g planets presented in Ducrot et al. (2018) by adding transit depths deduced from our global analysis in J and NB2090 bands. Our data set only includes two NB2090 band tran- sits of TRAPPIST-1 b and one of TRAPPIST-1 c which is a cleaner, narrower bandpass (see Subsection 2.2). Additional transit depth measurements are especially needed with this MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Figure 4. Ratio of the individual transit depth to the average depth from the global MCMC analysis as a function of time (JD). 0.040.030.020.010.000.010.020.030.04Time since mid-transit (d)0.770.790.810.830.850.870.890.910.930.950.970.991.01Relative fluxTRAPPIST-1b, J bandTRAPPIST-1b, NB2090 bandTRAPPIST-1c, J bandTRAPPIST-1c, NB2090 bandTRAPPIST-1d, J bandTRAPPIST-1e, J bandTRAPPIST-1f, J bandTRAPPIST-1g, J band10 A. Burdanov et al. bandpass to improve the precision. The updated transmis- sion spectra is presented in Fig. 5. We note that transit depths of planet b in the near-IR are consistent with previously published non-HST transit depth measurements. They lie in most cases within ∼ 1-σ of the HST results, but are consistently shallower in depth. HST measurements in their turn could be affected by the telescope orbit-dependent systematic effects, which could re- sult in much deeper transit depths (see de Wit et al. (2016), Subsection 3.2 in Ducrot et al. (2018) and Zhang et al. (2018) for details). For TRAPPIST-1 c our deduced transit depths also disagree somewhat with HST measurements and show, like TRAPPIST-1 b, shallower transits comparing to Spitzer 4.5 µm depths, but lie within the 3-σ interval. Transit depths of TRAPPIST-1 d are in agreement with HST data, and show excellent agreement for g. For planets e and f our de- duced depths in 1.2 µm are deeper than all published depths in other spectral ranges. But these findings are based on just two transits of TRAPPIST-1 e, and transits of TRAPPIST- 1 f show considerable temporal variations. Though there is a certain difficulty in obtaining ab- solute near-IR transit depths, it may be mitigated by us- ing different instruments with partially overlapping wave- length bands. This mitigation procedure requires spec- tra taken with different instruments requires simultaneous multi-instruments observations in order to avoid compen- sating for time- and wavelength-dependent effects that may contaminate a planetary transmission spectrum, such as the epoch-dependent brightness distribution of the host star. We also added our depth measurements for planets b and c to the stellar contamination spectra proposed by Mor- ris et al. (2018a), which originate from the possible existence of bright spots of temperature 4500 K. We find that the prediction implies a flat contamination spectrum for wave- lengths redder than 0.7 µm and that this model disagrees with what we see in near-IR (see Fig. 6). Since the real distri- bution of the spots and their temperatures are unknown, the TRAPPIST-1 system would benefit from additional moni- toring in the near-IR to put better constraints on contami- nation models. In addition, current contamination models only account for spots or faculaes or their combinations, but the atmosphere of TRAPPIST-1 could contain dust. Miles-P´aez et al. (2019) using linear polarization photom- etry in the near-IR J band finds hints that the atmosphere of TRAPPIST-1 is quite dusty. Likely, this should also be included for proper accounting of stellar contamination. 5 CONCLUSIONS We presented here an extensive photometric data set of 25 transits of TRAPPIST-1 observed in the near-IR with UKIRT and AAT in J band (1.2 µm) and with the VLT in the NB2090 band (2.1 µm) from 2015 to 2018. We deduced individual transit depths for each transit taking into account inherent to ground-based near-IR observations correlations of transit parameters with the selected sets of comparison stars and photometric aperture sizes to obtain results as ro- bust and uniform as possible. We reach a photometric precision of ∼ 0.003 (RMS of the residuals), and we detect no significant temporal varia- tions of transit depths of TRAPPIST-1 b, c, e, and g, while Figure 5. Transmission spectra of TRAPPIST-1 b-h planets. The solid black line is the weighted mean of all measurements exclud- ing HST presented in Ducrot et al. (2018) with corresponding 1-σ confidence intervals in shades of gray and numerical values on the right. HST measurements are presented as grey points. Measure- ments in the near-IR (1.2 µm and 2.1 µm) from this study are presented as colored circles with white center. Each point is a median value of the posterior PDF and its respective 1-σ from the global analysis at the effective wavelength of corresponding instrument. transit depths of planets d and f show hints of variability with peak-to-peak values of 1800 and 2400 ppm, respec- tively. Besides thin cirrus observing conditions, we could not link these depth variations to any external parameters, including the amount of precipitable water vapour, the po- sition of the star on the detector, the mean FWHM, etc. We deduce that they likely originate from a few abnormal transits that were affected by thin cirrus, data gaps or, for MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) T1b 0.719 0.714 0.725T1c 0.692 0.687 0.698T1d 0.360 0.354 0.366T1e 0.481 0.473 0.489T1f 0.639 0.629 0.648T1g 0.760 0.750 0.770T1h 0.332 0.320 0.3441.02.5.Wavelength [µm]Transit Depth [%] . . . .Ground-based follow-up of TRAPPIST-1 in the near-IR 11 gique (F.R.S.-FNRS) under Grant No. 2.5020.11 and by the Walloon Region. PyRAF is a product of the Space Telescope Science In- stitute, which is operated by AURA for NASA. Authors would like to thank Mike Road and Mike Irwin from CASU for their help with access to the UKIRT data at WSA; Staff Scientists Drs. Tom Kerr and Watson Varricatt, Telescope Operators Sam Benigni, Tim Carroll, Eric Moore, and Michael Pohlen for scheduling and performing observa- tions with the UKIRT ; NASA, University of Arizona, Uni- versity of Hawai'i, Lockheed Martin, and the US Naval Ob- servatory for support and granting time for the above noted observing programs; Duncan Wright and Tayyaba Zafar for performing observations with the AAT ; Evgeny Ivanov for his advises on (C´ECI) computations. The research leading to these results have received fund- ing from the ARC grant for Concerted Research Actions, financed by the Wallonia-Brussels Federation, and by the NASA K2 Cycle 4 program. V.V.G. is a F.R.S.-FNRS Research Associate, M.G. and E.J. are F.R.S.-FNRS Senior Research Associates. Authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for the constructive comments, which helped us to improve the quality of the paper. REFERENCES Apai D., et al., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1803.08708) Barstow J. K., Irwin P. G. J., 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 461, L92 Casali M., et al., 2007, A&A, 467, 777 Claret A., Hauschildt P. H., Witte S., 2012, A&A, 546, A14 Clark B. J. M., Anderson D. R., Madhusudhan N., Hellier C., Smith A. M. S., Collier Cameron A., 2018, A&A, 615, A86 Croll B., et al., 2015, ApJ, 802, 28 Cubillos P., Harrington J., Loredo T. J., Lust N. B., Blecic J., Stemm M., 2017, AJ, 153, 3 Delrez L., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 475, 3577 Ducrot E., et al., 2018, AJ, 156, 218 Gelman A., Rubin D. B., 1992, Statistical Science, 7, 457 Gillon M., et al., 2012, A&A, 542, A4 Gillon M., et al., 2014, A&A, 563, A21 Gillon M., et al., 2016, Nature, 533, 221 Gillon M., et al., 2017, Nature, 542, 456 Gizis J. E., Monet D. G., Reid I. N., Kirkpatrick J. D., Liebert J., Williams R. J., 2000, AJ, 120, 1085 Grimm S. L., et al., 2018, A&A, 613, A68 Howell S. B., 2006, Handbook of CCD Astronomy Lendl M., Gillon M., Queloz D., Alonso R., Fumel A., Jehin E., Naef D., 2013, A&A, 552, A2 Lincowski A. P., Meadows V. S., Crisp D., Robinson T. D., Luger R., Lustig-Yaeger J., Arney G. N., 2018, ApJ, 867, 76 Luger R., et al., 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0129 Mandel K., Agol E., 2002, ApJ, 580, L171 Miles-P´aez P. A., Zapatero Osorio M. R., Pall´e E., Metchev S. A., 2019, MNRAS, 484, L38 Moran S. E., Horst S. M., Batalha N. E., Lewis N. K., Wakeford H. R., 2018, AJ, 156, 252 Morley C. V., Kreidberg L., Rustamkulov Z., Robinson T., Fort- ney J. J., 2017, ApJ, 850, 121 Morris B. M., Agol E., Davenport J. R. A., Hawley S. L., 2018a, ApJ, 857, 39 Morris B. M., et al., 2018b, ApJ, 863, L32 Rackham B. V., Apai D., Giampapa M. S., 2018, ApJ, 853, 122 Figure 6. Stellar contamination spectra proposed by Morris et al. (2018a) originating from possible existence of bright spots of tem- perature 4500 K (gray continuous line) with plotted observed depth variations displayed as red points (depths from HST are presented as grey points). The gray horizontal bars are the band- integrated value for stellar contamination spectra where the inte- grals are weighted uniformly in wavelength. one, by a possible spot-crossing event. Considering the small number of observed transits for TRAPPIST-1 d and f, the system would benefit from more transit observations and from frequent monitoring in the near-IR to probe photomet- ric activity of the host star, to better characterize its photo- spheric homogeneity and to understand if hints of temporal variability are of astrophysical origin. We did not detect any flare nor transit that could be attributed to other undetected planets. One possible clear spot crossing event of TRAPPIST-1 f is presented in light curve #21 with an amplitude of 200 ppm. We also computed transit timings which will be helpful for further mass and densities updates of the planets via TTV studies. Our depth measurements for planets b and c disagree with the stellar contamination spectra proposed by Morris et al. (2018a), which originate from the possible existence of bright spots of temperature 4500 K. Finally, updated transmission spectra are presented for the six inner planets of the system. We conclude that spectra of TRAPPIST-1 b and g are globally flat, but some structures are seen for planets c, d, e and f what could be epoch-dependent and coming from the stellar origin. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TRAPPIST-1 observations in NB2090 band are based the European Southern on observations collected at Observatory under ESO programmes 296.C-5010(A) and 598.C-0347(A). Observations with UKIRT were taken projects U/15B/NA05A, U/16A/NA04, U/16B/NA03, U/17A/NA01, U/17B/NA01, U/18A/NAV05, and U/18B/NAV03. Observations with the AAT are based on programmes A/2016B/109 and A/2017B/104. non-survey through Computational resources have been provided by the Consortium des ´Equipements de Calcul Intensif (C´ECI), funded by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique de Bel- MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) 1.02.0.55.0.00.51.01.51.52.01.21.31.41.51.6 . . . .Wavelength [µm]Transit Depth [%]TRAPPIST−1 b+c12 A. Burdanov et al. Rodler F., L´opez-Morales M., 2014, ApJ, 781, 54 Schwarz G., 1978, Annals of Statistics, 6, 461 Siebenmorgen R., Carraro G., Valenti E., Petr-Gotzens M., Bram- mer G., Garcia E., Casali M., 2011, The Messenger, 144, 9 Tinney C. G., et al., 2004, in Moorwood A. F. M., Iye M., eds, Proc. SPIEVol. 5492, Ground-based Instrumentation for As- tronomy. pp 998 -- 1009, doi:10.1117/12.550980 Tody D., 1986, in Crawford D. L., ed., Proceedings of the Meet- ing, Tucson, AZ, March 4-8, 1986 Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Bellingham, WA, p. 733 Van Grootel V., et al., 2018, ApJ, 853, 30 Wakeford H. R., et al., 2019, AJ, 157, 11 Winn J. N., et al., 2008, ApJ, 683, 1076 Zhang Z., Zhou Y., Rackham B., Apai D., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1802.02086) de Wit J., et al., 2016, Nature, 537, 69 de Wit J., et al., 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 214 APPENDIX A: LIGHT CURVES AND RESPECTIVE BINNED RESIDUALS RMS VERSUS BIN SIZE PLOTS MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Ground-based follow-up of TRAPPIST-1 in the near-IR 13 MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Figure A1. light curves (LC) #1-6. See Tables 1,2, and 3 for the details. 14 A. Burdanov et al. Figure A2. light curves (LC) #7-12. See Tables 1,2, and 3 for the details. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Ground-based follow-up of TRAPPIST-1 in the near-IR 15 MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Figure A3. light curves (LC) #13-18. See Tables 1,2, and 3 for the details. 16 A. Burdanov et al. Figure A4. light curves (LC) #19-24. See Tables 1,2, and 3 for the details. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Ground-based follow-up of TRAPPIST-1 in the near-IR 17 Figure A5. light curve (LC) #25. See Tables 1,2, and 3 for the details. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) 18 A. Burdanov et al. Figure A6. Binned residuals RMS versus bin size plots for light curves (LC) #1-12. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) Ground-based follow-up of TRAPPIST-1 in the near-IR 19 Figure A7. Binned residuals RMS versus bin size plots for light curves (LC) #13-24. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) 20 A. Burdanov et al. Figure A8. Binned residuals RMS versus bin size plots for light curves (LC) #25. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019) This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author. Ground-based follow-up of TRAPPIST-1 in the near-IR 21 MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2019)
1706.06609	1	1706	2017-06-20T18:07:44	Evaluating the Dynamical Stability of Outer Solar System Objects in the Presence of Planet Nine	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We evaluate the dynamical stability of a selection of outer solar system objects in the presence of the proposed new Solar System member Planet Nine. We use a Monte Carlo suite of numerical N-body integrations to construct a variety of orbital elements of the new planet and evaluate the dynamical stability of eight Trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) in the presence of Planet Nine. These simulations show that some combinations of orbital elements ($a,e$) result in Planet Nine acting as a stabilizing influence on the TNOs, which can otherwise be destabilized by interactions with Neptune. These simulations also suggest that some TNOs transition between several different mean-motion resonances during their lifetimes while still retaining approximate apsidal anti-alignment with Planet Nine. This behavior suggests that remaining in one particular orbit is not a requirement for orbital stability. As one product of our simulations, we present an {\it a posteriori} probability distribution for the semi-major axis and eccentricity of the proposed Planet Nine based on TNO stability. This result thus provides additional evidence that supports the existence of this proposed planet. We also predict that TNOs can be grouped into multiple populations of objects that interact with Planet Nine in different ways: one population may contain objects like Sedna and 2012 VP$_{113}$, which do not migrate significantly in semi-major axis in the presence of Planet Nine and tend to stay in the same resonance; another population may contain objects like 2007 TG$_{422}$ and 2013 RF$_{98}$, which may both migrate and transition between different resonances.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version April 29, 2019 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 7 1 0 2 n u J 0 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 9 0 6 6 0 . 6 0 7 1 : v i X r a EVALUATING THE DYNAMICAL STABILITY OF OUTER SOLAR SYSTEM OBJECTS IN THE PRESENCE OF PLANET NINE Juliette C. Becker1, Fred C. Adams1,2, Tali Khain2, Stephanie J. Hamilton2, David Gerdes1,2 Draft version April 29, 2019 ABSTRACT We evaluate the dynamical stability of a selection of outer solar system objects in the presence of the proposed new Solar System member Planet Nine. We use a Monte Carlo suite of numerical N-body integrations to construct a variety of orbital elements of the new planet and evaluate the dynamical stability of eight Trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) in the presence of Planet Nine. These simulations show that some combinations of orbital elements (a, e) result in Planet Nine acting as a stabilizing influence on the TNOs, which can otherwise be destabilized by interactions with Neptune. These simulations also suggest that some TNOs transition between several different mean-motion resonances during their lifetimes while still retaining approximate apsidal anti-alignment with Planet Nine. This behavior suggests that remaining in one particular orbit is not a requirement for orbital stability. As one product of our simulations, we present an a posteriori probability distribution for the semi-major axis and eccentricity of the proposed Planet Nine based on TNO stability. This result thus provides additional evidence that supports the existence of this proposed planet. We also predict that TNOs can be grouped into multiple populations of objects that interact with Planet Nine in different ways: one population may contain objects like Sedna and 2012 VP113, which do not migrate significantly in semi-major axis in the presence of Planet Nine and tend to stay in the same resonance; another population may contain objects like 2007 TG422 and 2013 RF98, which may both migrate and transition between different resonances. 1. INTRODUCTION In our solar system, a large population of small, rocky objects resides beyond the orbit of Neptune, and the collective structure of this population is anomalous, ex- hibiting trends unexplained by random chance. Many of these objects appear to occupy a region close to the plane containing the eight known planets, leading to this region being called the Kuiper Belt. The existence of these objects has implications for the formation mecha- nism of our solar system; however, we have yet discovered only a small fraction of the objects orbiting beyond Nep- tune. Since the turn of the century, many new objects have been discovered in the Kuiper Belt. The subset of objects orbiting outside of Neptune's orbit are called Trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), and they often have dynamically interesting orbits. In particular, some of these objects have large semi-major axes and large per- ihelion distances, including, for example, Sedna (Brown et al. 2004), 2004 VN112 (Becker et al. 2008), 2010 GB174 (Chen et al. 2013), and 2012 VP113 (Trujillo & Sheppard 2014). When Trujillo & Sheppard (2014) reported the discov- ery of 2012 VP113, they also noted a curious clustering in argument of perihelion for the population of TNOs with high-a, high-q orbits. The authors proposed that the high-q orbits could be generated in three ways: first, by the ejection of a solar system body that left behind the observed clustering as a signature of its ejection; sec- ond, through a stellar fly-by encounter that perturbed the orbits of some TNOs into their current configura- [email protected] 1 Astronomy Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 2 Physics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA tions (Morbidelli & Levison 2004), where such interac- tions are relatively common in the birth cluster (Li & Adams 2015); third, through the presence of an addi- tional planet in the solar system. Notably, this third mechanism could also explain the clustering of this pop- ulation of TNOs, as the proposed ninth planet's repeated secular interactions with the shorter-period TNOs could force the TNOs to keep their ω confined to be near either 0 degrees or 180 degrees (for example, this could occur via the Kozai mechanism). Batygin & Brown (2016a) also suggested the existence of an additional planet (Planet Nine), which is differen- tiated from the potential planet discussed in Trujillo & Sheppard (2014) in the way it interacts with the TNOs. The Batygin & Brown (2016a) version of Planet Nine functions by explaining both the apsidal and ascending node alignment of a selection of objects in the Kuiper Belt. The objects under consideration in Batygin & Brown (2016a) were two overlapping sets of objects: first, those that have perihelion distance q > 30 AU and semi- major axis a > 150 AU, while being dynamically stable in the presence of Neptune; second, any objects which have q > 30 AU and semi-major axis a > 250 AU, all of which exhibit clustering in (when is defined as the longitude of perihelion, = ω + Ω). The orbit for Planet Nine presented in Batygin & Brown (2016a) was a rough estimate, with semi-major axis a = 700 AU, eccentricity e = 0.6, inclination i = 30 degrees, longi- tude of ascending node Ω = 113 degrees, and argument of perihelion ω = 150 degrees. The authors estimated the planet to have a mass of roughly 10 Earth masses, but all of these orbit predictions were noted as approxi- mate. This mass estimate was supported in a follow-up effort by the predicting authors (Brown & Batygin 2016), which placed constraints on the orbital elements of the 2 Becker et al. potential Planet Nine by using N-body simulations to de- termine which Planet Nine realizations lead to clustered TNOs in simulations. In this work, the authors deter- mined that a 10 Earth mass Planet Nine was more likely to recreate the observed clustering than a 20 Earth mass Planet Nine. The possibility of a new planet has led to a great deal of recent work, e.g., to evaluate the likelihood of Planet Nine's existence given the known properties of the Solar System. For example, Fienga et al. (2016) and Holman & Payne (2016) examined the measured Earth-Saturn distance, and determined that Planet Nine is likely to have a true anomaly near 117 degrees (based on the upper limit to the amplitude of the residuals for that distance measurement). In complementary work, Mal- hotra et al. (2016) evaluated the potential resonant be- havior that Planet Nine could invoke in the population of long-period TNOs, and predicted that Planet Nine should have a semi-major axis of a = 665 AU in order to support stability-boosting resonances. Other authors (Lawler et al. 2016; de la Fuente Marcos et al. 2016) have examined the dynamical effects that Planet Nine would have on the populations of objects that exist in the So- lar System. Finally, additional work was carried out to explain how Planet Nine would fit into our existing pic- ture of the Solar System. For example, multiple groups found that the existence of such a ninth planet can be in- voked to explain the six-degree obliquity of the sun (Bai- ley et al. 2016; Lai 2016; Gomes et al. 2017). Several pre- vious works have also suggested that the mechanism by which Planet Nine shapes the orbits of the TNOs may be orbital resonances (Batygin & Brown 2016a; Beust 2016; Malhotra et al. 2016; Millholland & Laughlin 2017). The conclusion in Batygin & Brown (2016a) was based only on six of the (at the time) thirteen discovered ex- treme TNOs. These six TNOs (2004 VN112, 2007 TG422, 2010 GB174, 2012 VP113, 2013 RF98, and Sedna) were chosen because they exhibit clustering in and have a > 250 AU, meaning they are expected to be influ- enced by Planet Nine. Sheppard & Trujillo (2016) also announced the discovery of two new objects (2014 SR349 and 2013 FT28) that also fit into the class of objects used by Batygin & Brown (2016a) to predict the existence of Planet Nine. In order for Planet Nine to be capable of forcing the orbits of the TNOs into aligned configura- tions, the TNOs must remain dynamically stable on sec- ular timescales, to allow apsidal alignment to occur. Ob- jects whose orbital elements are affected by short-period scattering events can be used to understand the scatter- ing event itself, but not the long-period, secular effects in the system. Numerical simulations in Batygin & Brown (2016a) and Sheppard & Trujillo (2016) determined that some of the high semi-major axis (a > 250) objects' or- bits change significantly over 1 Gyr timescales. They used numerical simulations to evaluate the stability of these bodies in the presence of the four giant planets, and found that some objects were not dynamically stable. If two of the six objects used to infer the existence of Planet Nine are dynamically unstable (for example, being sus- ceptible to scattering events) in the presence of Neptune, it is less likely that those objects could reside in their cur- rent orbits long enough to be influenced by Planet Nine and become apsidally aligned via that mechanism. de la Fuente Marcos et al. (2016) also found that the six aforementioned extreme TNOs can become dynamically unstable on relatively short timescales in the presence of both Neptune and the nominal Planet Nine, which could potentially prevent the observed apsidal alignment from occurring on secular timescales. Of course, dynamical stability is a function of timescale. The objects with perihelion distances in the range 30-40 AU can be termed a part of the scattered disk (Lykawka & Mukai 2007). The objects in this population are characterized by repeated (potentially scattering) in- teractions with Neptune (Nesvorn´y & Roig 2001). An in- tegration of the solar system run for an indefinite amount of time (without the presence of Planet Nine) will even- tually lead to all objects in the scattered disk leaving the solar system. However, our solar system is only 4.5 Gyr old, and it does not take this long for Planet Nine to align the TNOs into the pattern reported in Batygin & Brown (2016a). For this reason, 'dynamical stability' in this work refers to objects which remain in orbits com- parable to their current orbits for 4.5 Gyr. Sheppard & Trujillo (2016) reported two new TNOs in the regime of interest for consideration of Planet Nine, and the population of discovered TNOs and Kuiper Belt Objects is rapidly growing. The Canada-France Ecliptic Plane Survey (Petit et al. 2011), which ran from 2003 -- 2007, detected 169 TNOs with a preference for larger TNOs (size R > 100 km). A 32-square-degree survey running from 2011 -- 2012 by Alexandersen et al. (2014) detected 77 TNOs. The Outer Solar System Origins Sur- vey (Bannister et al. 2016), which is currently in progress, has thus far detected 85 TNOs. The Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) is intended to discover comets and asteroids (particularly near-Earth objects), but has also found Kuiper Belt Ob- jects (Chen et al. 2016) and giant planet Trojans (Horner et al. 2012; Guan et al. 2012; Lin et al. 2016). In addi- tion to these dedicated Solar System searches, cosmolog- ical searches also allow for the serendipitous discovery of foreground TNOs. For example, the Dark Energy Survey has experienced great success in discovering TNOs and other solar system objects (Gerdes et al. 2016; Dark En- ergy Survey Collaboration et al. 2016), including a new dwarf planet (Gerdes et al. 2017). This ever-growing population of TNOs will allow for increasingly stronger constraints on the possible orbital elements of Planet Nine and its current location in the Solar System. These objects will also provide a clearer picture of the dynamical regimes of bodies in the outer Solar System, where these orbits are sculpted by Neptune on the inside and could be influenced by Planet Nine from the outside. In this paper, we use as our sample the TNOs with a > 250 AU from Batygin & Brown 2016a and two newly discovered objects (announced in Sheppard & Trujillo 2016) expected to be dynamically stable in the presence of the solar system objects. We use N-body techniques to simulate the behavior of these objects in the presence of Planet Nine to place limits on the possible orbital ele- ments (a, e) of Planet Nine. In Section 2, we describe the sets of simulations carried out in this work and present some results. Our treatment uses a Monte Carlo sample of 1500 Planet Nine realizations, and thus extends most previous work, which generally considered only a single nominal orbit or small number (generally N ≤ 3) of po- Planet Nine Stability Survey 3 tential orbits. The simulations enable us to estimate the mean lifetime of each TNO in the presence of each of the Planet Nine realizations under consideration. In Section 3, we develop and provide a posterior probability dis- tribution for the most likely values (a, e) for the Planet Nine orbit, given that we observe the eight TNOs in their current orbits. In Section 4, we discuss the different dy- namical instability mechanisms contributing to the po- tentially shortened lifetimes for the TNOs, and identify some interesting differences between objects in our sam- ple. In Section 5, we explore the relationship between the period of our injected Planet Nine and the period of each TNO, and show that TNOs living in dynamically stable configurations tend to attain integer period ratios with Planet Nine. Remarkably, some TNOs do not remain in the same commensurability for their entire lifetimes; instead, they transition between multiple near-resonant locations. The paper concludes, in Section 6, with a sum- mary of our main results and a discussion of avenues for future study. 2. NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF TNO ORBITAL EVOLUTION IN THE PRESENCE OF PLANET NINE Brown & Batygin (2016) provided a relative poste- rior probability distribution for the (a, e) of Planet Nine. This posterior was constructed using clustering argu- ments of the same type that were used in Batygin & Brown (2016a) to predict the existence of Planet Nine. The logic used in both these works can be summarized as follows: the observed TNOs' orbits are aligned in physi- cal space (the longitudes of perihelion and longitudes of ascending node Ω are confined to a narrow range in angles instead of uniformly populating all allowed an- gles), and the probability of this occurring by chance is low, even accounting for potential bias in the observa- tions. Numerical N-body simulations of a selection of test-particles at varying orbital radii do not recreate the observed clustering unless Planet Nine is included in the simulations; even then, some orbits of Planet Nine are more likely to recreate the observed clustering than oth- ers. From a suite of numerical integrations, Brown & Batygin (2016) predicted the combinations of (a, e) that were most likely to allow a population of test particles that exhibited the observed clustering in longitude of per- ihelion. The physical orientation of orbits is not the only ob- served physical property that can be measured from the known TNOs. The most basic property that the ob- served TNOs share is orbital stability: although merely seeing the TNO orbits today does not ensure that they are dynamically stable in those current orbits, the ob- served (Trujillo & Sheppard 2014; Batygin & Brown 2016a) physical clustering of the orbit directions suggests that the orbits have been dynamically stable for a long enough time for this alignment to develop. Whether or not the aligning agent is the theorized Planet Nine, this alignment would have to have taken place over secular timescales, suggesting that these TNOs must have been dynamically stable over such timescales. The dynamical stability of these objects is thus a fun- damental and necessary property. As such, any allowable Planet Nine would have to allow the continued dynami- cal stability of the TNOs over secular and solar system lifetimes. To evaluate the likelihood of any particular re- alization of Planet Nine, we must evaluate the lifetimes of the TNOs in the presence of said Planet Nine. 2.1. Numerical Methods To determine how the lifetimes of the TNOs vary in the presence of different combinations of the semi-major axis and eccentricity of Planet Nine, we run a large num- ber of numerical N-body integrations, each including one potential realization of Planet Nine and the population of TNOs we are testing. This population includes the six TNOs considered in Batygin & Brown (2016a) (2004 VN112, 2007 TG422, 2010 GB174, 2012 VP113, 2013 RF98, and Sedna) and two additional objects discovered by Sheppard & Trujillo (2016) (2014 SR349 and 2013 FT28) that appear to fit in the same dynamical class as the pre- vious six. The orbital elements of all eight objects in our sample are reported in Table 1. The objects we consider in this work are those with semi-major axis a > 250 AU and perihelion distance q > 30 AU. This is a different sample, with a stricter semi-major axis cut, than was originally used in Trujillo & Sheppard (2014) to iden- tify the clustering effect (Trujillo & Sheppard 2014, used a > 150 AU). We limited the objects considered in this paper to those with a > 250 AU for three reasons: first, these are the objects which are found in Batygin & Brown (2016a) to exhibit both confinement in the longitude of perihelion and in the longitude of ascending node; sec- ond, these large-a objects exhibit a variability in semi- major axis (Batygin & Brown 2016a) that can poten- tially lead to dynamical instability; third, we expect the dynamics of these long period orbits to be dominated by Planet Nine rather than by Neptune (Sheppard & Tru- jillo 2016). We choose to explore the effect of Planet Nine's a and e because the orbital angles of Planet Nine are directly oppositional to those of (all but one of) the discovered ETNOs, and the current location of Planet Nine can be estimated using other methods (for example, Fienga et al. 2016; Holman & Payne 2016). For this work, the inclination and orbital angles of Planet Nine were taken to be the nominal values presented in Batygin & Brown (2016a). The robust consideration of a wider range of angles is beyond the scope of this work, but we report a basic reproduction of the experiments of this work while allowing the orbital angles to vary in Appendix B. We choose to fix these angles for the remainder of the main manuscript for two reasons: first, to examine the effect of (a, e), we take a cross section in the other angles in order to remove the degeneracies that would be imposed by allowing these angles to vary; second, considering all orbital angles would be too computationally intensive, so we choose the best values we can and proceed under the assumption that altering these angles will not change the broad trends of the results. To evaluate the dynamical stability (and thus, ex- pected mean orbital lifetimes) of these eight TNOs in the presence of Planet Nine, we ran 1500 numerical N-body integrations using the hybrid symplectic and Bulirsch- Stoer (B-S) integrator built into Mercury6 (Chambers 1999), and conserved energy to 1 part in 1010. We re- placed the three inner giant planets (Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus) with a solar J2 (as done in Batygin & Brown 2016a). We included Neptune as an active particle be- cause the orbital motion of Neptune may induce scatter- 4 Becker et al. ing or resonant effects on the TNOs, potentially leading to dynamical instabilities (rapid, drastic orbital evolu- tion for the TNOs). For each realization, we included each TNO with orbital elements drawn from observa- tional constraints, sampling each orbital element from reported 1σ errors. Then, we integrated each of the 1500 realizations forward for 4.5 Gyr using computational re- sources provided by Towns et al. (2014). For data man- agement, we used the pandas python package (McKinney 2010). Some of the TNOs (2013 RF98, for example) have very rough observational priors. Since we are sampling from observational priors in the orbital elements we assign to these small bodies, the lifetimes of these objects (com- pared to Sedna, whose orbital properties are much better constrained) include the degeneracy of both Planet Nine and also of the TNO itself. This leads to smoothed dis- tributions, which are effectively convolutions of the true lifetimes with an uncertainty kernel including the errors of the measured orbital properties of the object. The final result of these simulations is 1500 measures of dynamical lifetime for each object, which can be plot- ted on a (a, e) grid as shown in the top panel of Figure 1 (which shows the points for 2012 VP113). We do not expect the lifetimes to form a smooth function for several reasons: first, for each object, we draw orbital parame- ters from observational priors, resulting in some expected scatter in results for even a single Planet Nine realization; second, chaotic effects will cause scatter in outcomes be- tween realizations. For that reason, we must run enough simulations that we can treat the averaged value from all results near a Planet Nine (a, e) point as a good average of the behavior that a given Planet Nine would engender. We construct the contour plots in Figure 2 and Fig- ure 4 by using a polyharmonic spline (from Jones et al. 2001) to smooth and interpolate between the points gen- erated by our Monte Carlo simulations. We investigated the effects of different interpolation methods, and found that for our sample size (N ∼ 1500 realizations), the in- terpolation scheme does not drastically affect the final result. However, it is important to note that when we attempted to use N ∼ 100 realizations, the results var- ied drastically between different interpolation schemes. Since our sample size does not show such variations be- tween methods, we consider the (a, e) parameter space well-sampled. Figure 1 demonstrates the smoothed two- dimensional lifetime function and provides a comparison to the raw points for one object (2012 VP113) in our sam- ple. Analogous plots (not presented) can be constructed for each of the eight objects in our sample. 2.2. Numerical Results The results of the simulations are plotted in Figure 2, which presents contour plots for the expected orbital lifetimes of the eight TNOs in the presence of various realizations of Planet Nine. The main results that we get from this experiment fit into three categories: we affirm the potential stability of all eight TNOs in the presence of Neptune and Planet Nine, we find that different TNOs prefer different parameter spaces of Planet Nine, and we examine the fate of the TNOs that do go dynamically unstable. Stability of TNOs. For all objects in our sample, there are realizations of Planet Nine that allow them to Fig. 1. -- (Top panel) The points for one object in our sample, 2012 VP113, which are color coded by the amount of time the system remained dynamically stable. (Bottom panel) The same points, turned into a contour plot by use of a polyharmonic spline. The contour plot allows for easier comparison of the posterior for each object, and visualizes the interpolation up for the Monte Carlo sampling. remain dynamically stable for the lifetime of the solar system. Here, dynamical stability requires that a TNO remain within 100 AU of its starting orbit, and not ex- perience collisions with the planets or central body. This value of 100 AU was chosen from examination of the time-evolution of the bulk set of TNOs. We find that when orbits vary by less than 100 AU, the objects are generally confined to a network of mean motion reso- nances (MMRs), an outcome that we describe in Section 5. When orbits change by more than 100 AU, they po- tentially change dynamical class. The criteria in Batygin & Brown (2016a) included the cut that aT N O > 250 AU, polyharmonic spline Planet Nine Stability Survey 5 Fig. 2. -- Individual contour plots of the lifetimes of each of the eight TNOs considered. The lifetime plots do not exhibit the same general trends, indicating that the different objects may be members of different dynamical classes of objects. Table 1 presents the complete list of their orbital properties; the title of each subplot here is the short name of the object it portrays. and 100 AU of migration inwards would change this dy- namical classification of 5 of the 8 TNOs considered in this work. Since this choice of cutoff is somewhat arbi- trary, we present in Table 2 the frequency of final dynam- ical outcome for each TNO in our sample. Migration is in outcome in between 7%-30%, depending on the TNO under consideration, so future work that uses a different criterion for migratory instability can expect variation from our results of this magnitude. Table 1 provides a 'Percent Stable' column, which gives for each object the percentage of our 1500 realizations (which all have different a, e for Planet Nine) which al- lowed that object to remain dynamically stable for the entire 4.5 Gyr simulation. Since our simulations also include Neptune as an active particle, all of these ob- jects can be dynamically stable in the presence of both Neptune and Planet Nine. Notably, 18 of our 1500 real- izations of Planet Nine allowed all eight TNOs to remain dynamically stable for 4.5 Gyr. The 18 trials that allowed all tested TNOs to survive had semi-major axes varying between 600 AU and 800 AU and eccentricities between 0.35 and 0.55. The small sample (N ∼ 18) that allowed all TNOs to survive limits any further conclusions based on their orbital parameters. Sheppard & Trujillo (2016) found that 2007 TG422 and 2013 RF98 were both dynam- ically unstable in the presence of Neptune, but they did not include a potential Planet Nine in their integrations. We find that 2007 TG422 and 2013 RF98 have stability percentages of less than 20%, making them less stable on average than, for example, 2012 VP113. However, with a dynamically favorable realization of Planet Nine, both of these objects can remain dynamically stable for a solar system lifetime. This result, combined with the result from Sheppard & Trujillo (2016) that these two objects are not dynamically stable in the presence of Neptune alone, suggests that Planet Nine can boost the orbital stability of these objects. Variations between behavior of different TNOs. For each object in our sample, different realizations of Planet Nine lead to differing object lifetimes. This is shown in Figure 2, which plots the lifetime of each TNO as a function of the semi-major axis and eccentricity of Planet Nine. These stability maps look very different for different objects. For example, large-a, low-e orbits lead to a longer lifetime for 2012 VP113. For this object, shorter object lifetimes occur if Planet Nine has a shorter perihelion distance (lower a or higher e). This is intu- itive. In contrast, 2007 TG422 is dynamically unstable in the presence of these same long perihelion-distance ob- jects that 2012 VP113 preferred. Since different objects prefer different regions of Planet Nine's possible parame- ter space, a better understanding of the constraints they provide can be obtained by considering all objects simul- taneously. We will discuss how this can be done, as well as find constraints using our results thus far, in Section 3. Fate of the TNOs. To construct the lifetime con- tours in Figure 2, we defined the lifetime of an object as the length of time it lived in our simulation without significant alterations in its orbit. We defined significant alterations in orbit to be any of the following: (1) mi- gration in semi-major axis by more than 100 AU from the starting orbit of the object, (2) collisions or a close encounter (defined as passing within 3 Hill radii of the larger body) with Planet Nine or Neptune, (3) collision with the central body, and (4) ejection from the solar sys- tem. It is clear that each of these criteria have different thresholds for importance, as well as different outcomes for the object. In particular, while ending methods (2-4) result in a violent end for the TNO, method (1) does not necessarily remove the TNO from the solar system: in- stead, the TNO's orbit is significantly altered, but the TNO may continue to be a part of the solar system, merely in a different location. Numerical simulations al- low these effects to be disentangled. In particular, we find that the two objects (2007 TG422 and 2013 RF98) that do not prefer the high-a, low-e realizations of Planet Nine tend to exhibit the migratory end in those realiza- 50070090011000.10.30.50.70.9Eccentricity of Planet NineGB17450070090011000.10.30.50.70.9RF9850070090011000.10.30.50.70.9SEDNA50070090011000.10.30.50.70.9TG4225007009001100Semi-major axis of Planet Nine (AU)0.10.30.50.70.9Eccentricity of Planet NineVN1125007009001100Semi-major axis of Planet Nine (AU)0.10.30.50.70.9VP1135007009001100Semi-major axis of Planet Nine (AU)0.10.30.50.70.9SR3495007009001100Semi-major axis of Planet Nine (AU)0.10.30.50.70.9FT280.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.5Lifetime (Gyr)6 Becker et al. TABLE 1 Stability of ETNOs in presence of Neptune and Planet Nine Object Name a (AU) e i (degrees) ω (degrees) Ω (degrees) Percent Stable 2003 VB12 (Sedna) 2004 VN112 2007 TG422 2010 GB174 2012 VP113 2013 RF98 2013 FT28 2014 SR349 499 318 482 371 261 325 310 288 0.85 0.85 0.93 0.87 0.69 0.88 0.86 0.84 11.92 25.56 18.59 21.54 24.06 29.61 17.3 18.0 311.5 327.1 285.8 347.8 292.8 316.5 40.2 341.3 144.5 66.0 113 130.6 90.8 67.6 217.8 34.8 45.3% 28.4% 14.6% 17.9% 56.5% 18.7% 19.9% 18.1% ¯δt1 300 Myr 625 Myr 1.24 Gyr 1.03 Gyr 9 Myr 1.01 Gyr 709 Myr 917 Myr Note. -- A list of the TNOs used for the dynamical survey. The dynamical stability of each object was evaluated using a suite of numerical N-body simulations. The orbital elements of each object provided in this table are the best fit observational values. In the simulations, the orbital elements were drawn from the 1σ distribution for each realization of each object. Also provided in this table is the percentage of realizations of each object that are dynamically stable. It is important to note that this percentage reported (which is the percentage of realizations of each object that are dynamically stable) is marginalized over all realizations of Planet Nine included in the simulations, and thus the exact percentage is not meaningful. What is meaningful is that the percentages are all non-zero, indicating that for a selection of orbital parameters and Planet Nine realizations, each object in our sample can be dynamically stable. 1: ¯δt is the difference in median lifetime (over all Planet Nine realizations) between two cases: case one being when the definition of dynamical instability does not include migration, and case two being when migration of more than 100 AU constitutes dynamical instability. Larger values indicate that TNOs are susceptible to significant (δa > 100) migrations in semi-major axis. tions, rather than experiencing a violent instability. We will further discuss this effect in Section 4. 3. DERIVING CONSTRAINTS ON THE ORBITAL ELEMENTS OF PLANET NINE Given the predicted lifetime distributions constructed in the previous section, we can constrain the orbital prop- erties of Planet Nine by determining which (a, e) combi- nations allow the continued dynamical stability of the observed clustered TNOs. We make an assumption here that in order for the TNOs to attain their observed clustering, they must have remained in their currently observed orbits for at least secular timescales. This would require those orbits being dynamically stable in the presence of Planet Nine. The process of constructing these constraints will be detailed in this section. 3.1. Bayesian inference towards a posterior probability distribution for the orbital elements of Planet Nine The ultimate goal of our dynamical stability analysis is to determine the posterior probability distribution for the orbital elements (a, e) of Planet Nine. This will serve as a check and supplement to previous orbital posteriors in the literature, which were estimated using different techniques. We define A to be the orbital elements of Planet Nine, Ti to be the expected dynamical lifetime of the ith TNO, and I to be all prior information that we can incorporate into our models (for example: the fact that Planet Nine exists is a prior we impose, as are the observational errors of the discovered TNOs, which lead to uncertainties on their orbits). With these definitions, the property we wish to measure is P (ATi, I), the prob- ability of A (Planet Nine's orbital elements), given the lifetimes of the observed TNOs and our other knowledge. This posterior probability function can be represented using Bayes' Theorem as follows: However, upon inspection of this expression, there is one clear problem: P (Ti, IA) requires knowledge of Ti, the actual lifetimes of the observed TNOs in our solar sys- tem. This is not a property that can be measured. As an added difficulty, the prior information encapsulated in I includes large uncertainties on the orbital elements of the observed TNOs. To overcome this difficulty, we define a new parame- ter, Di. Di is defined to be the computed lifetimes of the observed TNOs, where these lifetimes are marginal- ized over the observational priors of the TNOs' orbital elements and our other uncertainties that were before folded into I. Although we cannot measure the true life- times Ti, we have constructed TNO lifetime estimates Di as they depend on our priors by using numerical N-body simulations. These simulations are described in the pre- vious section, and a visualization of the derived lifetimes is presented in Figure 2. Now, we can rewrite the Bayesian statement of our posterior in terms of this new variable: P (DiA)P (A) P (ADi) = P (Di) (2) when P (DiA) is the probability of getting the numer- ically measured lifetimes conditional on the orbital ele- ments of Planet Nine, P (A) is our priors on Planet Nine's orbital elements, and P (Di) is the occurrence probability of our computed lifetimes. Of course, we have N TNOs to consider in this analysis, so what we really need to compute is the posterior probability distribution as it depends on the numerically estimated lifetimes of all N objects: P (AD1, D2...DN ) = P (D1, D2...DNA)P (A) P (D1, D2...DN ) , P (ATi, I) = P (Ti, IA)P (A) P (Ti, I) (1) which, using the definition of Bayes' theorem, reduces Planet Nine Stability Survey 7 Outcomes of ETNOs in presence of Neptune and Planet Nine TABLE 2 Object Migration (a > 100 AU) Close Encounter Collision with Central Body Ejection Survive to 4.5 Gyr 2003 VB12 (Sedna) 2004 VN112 2007 TG422 2010 GB174 2012 VP113 2013 RF98 2013 FT28 2014 SR349 16.0% 14.9% 29.3% 17.8% 7.1% 14.0% 17.2% 22.0% 19.3% 30.6% 32.9% 31.2% 21.1% 40.6% 30.7% 39.5% 0.1% 0.7% 0.0% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 19.3% 25.4% 23.1% 32.7% 14.8% 26.7% 32.2% 19.8% 45.3% 28.4% 14.6% 17.9% 56.5% 18.7% 19.9% 18.1% Note. -- For each TNO used in the dynamical simulations, the percentage of integrations that ended in each major instability outcome. into the form: P (AD1, D2...DN ) = P (D1) × P (D2) × ...P (DN ) × P (D1A) × P (D2A) × ...P (DNA) P (D1, D2...DN ) P (A)N−1 (3) We can say that D1, D2...DN are conditionally inde- pendent, since we treated all TNOs as test particles in the simulations used to generate {Di}. Since each TNO has zero mass in the simulations, removing one will not alter the lifetime maps for the other objects. As a result, the first term of the right-hand side of Equation 3 can be treated as a normalization coefficient, which is needed only when comparing different versions of P (AD1, D2...DN ) constructed with different numbers N of TNOs. We need only a relative posterior probability distribution, which will identify the most likely realiza- tion of Planet Nine and identify the parameter space in which it is likely to reside. (cid:81)n=N The final result we need to compute, then, is: n=1 P (DiA) P (A)N−1 P (AD1, D2...DN ) = a (4) when D denotes the lifetime of a TNO in the presence of Planet Nine as measured from simulations, i denotes the TNO considered, A denotes the orbital elements (a, e) of Planet Nine. P (A) is a known quantity, and P (DiA) can be measured from the stability maps constructed using the N-body integrations. 3.2. Converting TNO lifetime maps to probability distributions Equation 4, which can be used to construct our goal posterior probability distribution, requires P (DiA) for each TNO in the sample. P (DiA) is the probability of the TNOs' lifetimes as they depend on the orbital ele- ments of Planet Nine. To compute this term, we must convert the lifetime maps presented in Figure 2 into prob- ability distributions. Each realization of Planet Nine will lead to a differ- ent time of dynamical instability (defined as the time at which an object experiences one of the four instability mechanisms described in Section 2.2), with some objects never experiencing dynamical instability. In Figure 3, we plot a histogram of the object lifetimes for 2013 RF98, as derived from the 1500 numerical integrations run with varying realizations of Planet Nine. Fig. 3. -- A histogram of lifetimes (measured from time t = 0 at the start of the N-body simulation) for 2013 RF98. Barring a pile-up at lifetimes of t = 4.5 Gyr (corresponding to realizations that were stable for the duration of the simulation; these were not included in the fit), the decay appears to have an approximately exponential trend. Although the longer object lifetimes can intuitively be interpreted as corresponding to more likely realizations of Planet Nine, we would like to convert these lifetimes into a relative probability function. Since an exponential decay trend appears to be a good, empirical fit for the lifetimes of an object marginalized over all integrations (regardless of the fact that the realization of Planet Nine varies between the different trials), we can fit a decay constant λ from the lifetime histogram for all decaying realizations of a single TNO: fdecay(t) = C0e−λt (5) when fdecay(t) is the fraction of realizations decaying at each time t, C0 a normalization constant, and λ the de- cay constant to be fit. For each object in our sample, the histogram of instability times was fit with exponential curve using a simple Levenburg-Marquardt optimization scheme, with all objects that do not experience dynam- ical instability (which have lifetimes t = 4.5 Gyr) ex- cluded from the fit. The results of this fit for 2013 RF98 are plotted in Figure 3. For this particular object, if we extend the exponential curve to infinite time, we ex- pect only 0.4% of these dynamically stable objects to become dynamically unstable, indicating that the ma- jority of objects that have not decayed after 4.5 Gyr are truly dynamically stable. 8 Becker et al. (cid:26)Ns/N To construct a final probability distribution, we need to account for the fact that for each object, some fraction of trials were dynamically stable for the entire 4.5 Gyr integration length. For this reason, we construct a piece- wise probability function for P (DiA), the probability we get these lifetimes from our simulation given a particular set of A, Planet Nine's orbital elements: P (DiA) = if Di=4.5 Gyr else C1 × e−λDi (6) when P (DiA) is the probability of computing the ob- ject lifetime Di for the ith TNO in the presence of a Planet Nine with orbital elements A, Ns the number of integrations for which the object did not experience dy- namical instability, N the total number of integrations, λ the decay constant determined from the previous fit, and C1 is a normalization constant of the form: (cid:34)(cid:90) 4.5 Gyr (cid:35)−1 e−λtdt (7) C1 = N − Ns N × 0 The substitution of Equation 6 into Equation 4 results in a final expression of the posterior probability distribu- tion P (AD1, D2...DN ). For the eight objects considered in this work, this final distribution is plotted in Figure 4. It is important to note that this process required mul- tiple steps of normalization, which depend on P (A), the priors, and the populations of TNOs used to derive con- straints. Since we (by necessity) treated the objects used in this analysis as conditionally independent, the poste- rior presented in Figure 4 provides relative, rather than absolute, measures of the likelihood of each (a, e) real- ization of Planet Nine. The derived decay constant must be re-derived if different populations of TNOs or differ- ent orbits of Planet Nine are tested in the future; the values used in this work are particular to our sample of eight TNOs in the presence of our particular population of Planet Nines. For this reason, we do not provide the decay constants in this work, as they cannot be used for these objects in general but only for our particular choices of Planet Nine's priors. 3.3. The posterior probability distribution for Planet Nine's orbital elements Figure 4 presents the final posterior probability dis- tribution for Planet Nine's orbital elements (a, e), based on the observed dynamical stability of the eight TNOs considered in this work. This distribution provides a relative measure of the likelihood of differing combina- tions of Planet Nine's semi-major axis and eccentricity. The nominal orbit of Planet Nine (700 AU, 0.6 eccen- tricity) appears to lie in a less preferred region, with slightly smaller eccentricities (0.3-0.4) being preferred. Remarkably, the large-a, low-e orbits appear to be ex- cluded based on our dynamical stability arguments. This is roughly consistent with the posterior generated us- ing clustering arguments, provided in Brown & Batygin (2016), which also preferred a middling eccentricity and excluded large-a, low-e iterations of Planet Nine. 3.4. Comparing our prediction of Planet Nine's Orbit with constraints derived via different methods Fig. 4. -- The overall stability posterior for the semi-major axis and eccentricity of Planet Nine. This posterior was constructed by taking a summation of the posteriors for each individual object, including the six objects used in Batygin & Brown (2016a) and the two new high-a, low-e objects from Sheppard & Trujillo (2016). The posterior probability distribution we present in Figure 4 was generated using dynamical stability argu- ments. Specifically, Planet Nine realizations that allow the observed TNOs to remain dynamically stable are con- sidered to be more likely than those that cause dynami- cal instabilities. Brown & Batygin (2016) also provided a probability map showing the most likely regions for Planet Nine based on the observed orbital alignment of the TNOs. In Figure 5, we compare the two probability distributions presented in Brown & Batygin (2016) to the distribution derived in this work (along with additional contours described below). For these distributions, we plot a single contour in Figure 5 using the value 1σ be- low the maximum probability of the distribution. The level of this contour is chosen so that the single contours visually reflect the highest probability regions for each posterior type. The choice of the (maximum - 1σ) level is representative, but by no means the only way to visu- alize the comparisons between the posterior types. The regions showing the most overlap between the 10 M⊕ alignment result from Brown & Batygin (2016) and our dynamical stability result are those with a semi- major axis between 525 -- 675 AU and an eccentricity of 0.40 -- 0.55, and the region with a semi-major axis be- tween 700 -- 800 AU and an eccentricity of 0.25 -- 0.35. A recent paper by Millholland & Laughlin (2017) also used dynamical stability arguments and resonance considera- tions to choose a best-fit (a, e) of (654 AU, 0.45). This point is also plotted in Figure 5 and appears to be con- sistent with the region showing overlap between both the dynamical stability results of this work and those of (Brown & Batygin 2016). The posteriors plotted in Figure 5 include four curves based on N-body simulations and one analytical curve. The analytical curve encompasses the regime where the equation of motion dω/dt ≈ 0. It is important to note that this analytic approximation is not a true analysis of the dynamics of the system, as the derivation (the com- plete form of which is presented in Appendix A) assumes all bodies are coplanar, and solves for alignment rather Planet Nine Stability Survey than anti-alignment. Thus, this analytic model is more an order-of-magnitude estimate of the effect we expect to see, rather than a true prediction. The functional form for dω/dt is derived from the sec- ular Hamiltonian, and assumes the form: mia2 4(cid:88) i (e2 − 1)−2a−2 (cid:19)4 √ (cid:18) a (cid:19)3 √ 1 − e2 9)5/2 a9 i=1 (1 − e2 1 − e2 9)3/2 , (1 − e2 a9 dω dt ∝ 3 4Mc m9 Mc e9 e (cid:18) a − 15 16 − 3 4 m9 Mc (1 − 9e2/4) cos(ω − ω9) 9 about 2 × 10−5 (for alignment among all eight TNOs). As a result, the numerical simulations show an overabun- dance of alignment in certain, preferred regions (denoted by the green contour of Figure 5). The constraints provided by the three methods in this work and the two literature results show rough agree- ment: the region of Planet Nine parameter space look- ing most attractive extends over the range 500 -- 700 AU in semi-major axis, and 0.3-0.6 in eccentricity. Notably, low eccentricities are disfavored. Notice also that the contours preferred for TNO stability are somewhat par- allel to those for orbital alignment. In order for Planet Nine to be close enough to the TNOs to enforce align- ment, it must be close enough that the TNO orbit is close to instability. As a result, the preferred region is given by the boundary between the stablity contours and the alignment contours in Figure 5. 4. END STATES FOR TRANS-NEPTUNIAN OBJECTS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF PLANET NINE The numerical simulations that we use to create distri- butions of TNO lifetime in the presence of Planet Nine evaluate the long-term evolution of these TNOs. As dis- cussed in Section 2, there are five main outcomes for these TNOs: (1) migration in semi-major axis, which is defined in the simulations as the orbit's semi-major axis attaining a value more than 100 AU from the starting orbit; (2) a close encounter (defined as passing within 3 Hill radii of the larger body) with Planet Nine or Nep- tune, which would result in the TNO being captured by or colliding with the large planet; (3) collision with the central body; (4) ejection from the solar system, where the ejection radius is taken to be 10,000 AU3; and fi- nally, (5) dynamical stability, where none of the afore- mentioned effects occur over the 4.5 Gyr timescale of the simulation. This final result (5) corresponds to scenarios that are consistent with observations, where the TNO can remain in its orbit over solar system lifetimes. This scenario allows the secular alignment of the TNOs' lon- gitude of perihelion by Planet Nine. However, if this last result does not occur, then the TNO will experience one of the first four (1-4) outcomes. Within these four dynamical instability outcomes, there is further stratification in the effects of each mecha- nism. The violent ends (collision with a planet, the star, or ejection from the system) generally remove the TNO from the solar system entirely, while the migratory out- come is more nuanced. TNOs that are in the process of migrating cannot necessarily be used as evidence of the Planet Nine hypothesis, since their orbital elements are in flux and may not have had sufficient time in their current orbits to attain the alignment that serves as a hallmark of Planet Nine's influence. 2007 TG422 was one of the more interesting objects in the sample of TNOs considered in this work. Although found in Sheppard & Trujillo (2016) to be dynamically unstable in the presence of Neptune, we reevaluated the stability of 2007 TG422 in the presence of Planet Nine in Section 2, and found that adding Planet Nine to the 3 This choice in ejection radius will remove objects which become unbound; it is important to note that there may be second order ef- fects due to stellar encounters (see, for example, Li & Adams 2016). The effect on TNO motion due to these external perturbations is expected to be small, and is neglected in this work. (8) where the subscript 9 denotes the orbital elements of Planet Nine, the subscript i within the summation in the first term denotes the four giant planets, c denotes the central body, and a lack of subscript denotes the TNO for which the equation of motion is written. This equation of motion can be split into two parts: dωSS/dt, which denotes precession due to the effect of the gas giants, and dω9/dt, which denotes the precession due to the effect of Planet Nine. The magnitudes of these terms can be written in the form 4(cid:88) i=1 m9 Mc dωSS dt dω9 dt ∝ 3 4Mc ∝ 15e9 16e + 3 4 m9 Mc mia2 (cid:18) a (cid:18) a a9 i (e2 − 1)−2a−2 (cid:19)4 √ 1 − e2 (cid:19)3 √ (1 − e2 9)5/2 1 − e2 9)3/2 (1 − e2 a9 (1 − 9e2 4 ) cos(ω − ω9) (9) where dωT N O/dt = dωSS/dt − dω9/dt. At the point where dωSS/dt ≈ dω9/dt, the precession rates due to Planet Nine and the inner solar system cancel each other out, and the TNO orbit is not expected to precess. For each TNO, we can construct a curve in the (a, e) plane for which these precession rates cancel. The region pre- sented in Figure 5 is the superposition of these curves for all eight TNOs, and it encompasses the range of Planet Nine realizations which will allow alignment by prevent- ing precession. Figure 5 also presents (in green) a posterior based on alignment of the TNOs, as derived from our set of nu- merical simulations. Our simulations were intended to test dynamical stability, but one output of the N-body simulation is the orbital elements ω and Ω of the TNOs over time. Using a similar technique to that used to construct the dynamical stability posterior in Figure 4, we tested how well aligned the TNOs were for each re- alization of Planet Nine. Alignment was measured by looking at the fraction of time for which all eight TNOs were aligned with each other (and thus anti-aligned with Planet Nine: we counted dispersions of less than 94 de- grees in = ω + Ω between all eight TNOs as aligned). We constructed a contour plot of the percentage of the integrations during which alignment was visible for all eight TNOs, which exhibited between near 0% alignment to a maximum of ∼10% alignment in the green regions. The alignment rate expected for pure chance would be 10 Becker et al. Fig. 5. -- A comparison between the preferred regions for Planet Nine's orbit, as computed using a variety of different methods. Bold In red, we plot the region that maximizes the survival probability for the labels indicate that the posterior was derived in this work. TNOs in our N-body simulations (based on their dynamical stability; see Figure 4). In green, we plot the realizations of Planet Nine orbital parameters in our N-body simulations that allowed the TNOs to be aligned as observed in nature. In black, we plot the analytic approximation for the region where we expect the observed alignment to occur (see Equation 8 and its derivation in the Appendix B). In blue, we plot the region reported in Brown & Batygin (2016) that allows the alignment of TNOs in a suite of numerical N-body simulations (unlike the green curve, these simulations used randomized test particles). The purple point denotes the best-fit orbit as reported by Millholland & Laughlin (2017), which was found by optimizing the resonant behavior of the TNOs in the presence of Planet Nine. Each method prefers somewhat different regimes of parameter space, with the dynamical stability argument allowing the largest region. There is significant overlap between the results derived from the different methods. The optimal orbital elements for Planet Nine exist in the overlap region, which corresponds to eccentricity in the range e9 = 0.4 -- 0.6 and semimajor axis in the range a9 = 500 -- 700 AU. solar system can actually stabilize the orbit of this ob- ject. 2007 TG422 has a particularly high semi-major axis and eccentricity, suggesting that its dynamical instabil- ity might be due to orbit crossing with other planets. However, this is not the case. The most common dy- namical instability mechanism for 2007 TG422 is actually migration, leading this object to remain present in the solar system but wander from its starting orbit. This migratory outcome is likely what Sheppard & Trujillo (2016) found in their work, and we reproduce this insta- bility in the case of large-a, low-e realizations of Planet Nine (which is dynamically very similar to the case of no Planet Nine, as considered in Sheppard & Trujillo (2016)). The top panels of Figure 6 show the instability life- time map for 2007 TG422 when only violent instability methods are considered (top panel) and when migratory instabilities are also considered (middle panel). The sig- nificantly shortened lifetimes present in this middle panel show that migration is the main explanation for 2007 TG422's dynamical instability in the presence of Planet Nine. The bottom panel of Figure 6 shows the difference in expected dynamical stability lifetime for this object between the cases depicted in the top two panels: when this difference is low, migration does not have a large effect in ending the integrations, and when it is high, migration is a very common outcome for 2007 TG422 in the presence of that particular Planet Nine realization. This difference plot highlights the regions where migra- tion acts as the main cause of dynamical instability. The large-a, low-e realizations of Planet Nine tend to cause migration of 2007 TG422, but not violent dynamical in- stabilities. The susceptibility of an object to migration in the pres- ence of Planet Nine can also be summarized as ¯δt, the difference in median lifetime (over all Planet Nine re- alizations) for an object between the case when migra- tion is considered to be a dynamically unstable outcome and when it is ignored. Larger values of ¯δt indicate that the TNO is more susceptible to significant migration in semi-major axis (δa > 100 AU), and that such migra- tions significantly change the dynamical stability map of that object. The choice of δa > 100 AU as the threshold criterion for migration is somewhat arbitrary. It is cho- sen to represent the condition for which an object has drifted significantly from its observed orbit. Migration Planet Nine Stability Survey 11 in semi-major axis with deviations greater than 100 AU generally results in an orbit with significantly different orbital elements, rather than oscillation of the orbital el- ements around well-defined central values. As a result, objects that migrate by more than 100 AU are unlikely to remain part of the same dynamical class of object. For 2007 TG422 , ¯δt = 1.07 Gyr, meaning that Planet Nine incites migration in this object often enough to de- crease its dynamically stable lifetime by more than one In contrast, 2012 VP112 has a ¯δt = 32 billion years. Myr, indicating that migration does not play a large role in its outcomes. The values of ¯δt for each object in our sample are reported in Table 1, which presents in its last two columns both ¯δt and the percentage of trials out of all our simulations that are dynamically stable. As the percentage increases (or, as an object is more stable in the presence of any considered Planet Nine realization), the value of ¯δt tends to decrease (or, the TNO experi- ences migration as an instability outcome with a lower frequency). This suggests that susceptibility to migra- tion is a major factor leading to differences in orbit life- times between different TNOs in the presence of Planet Nine. In this work, we have made the assumption that since the eight TNOs in our sample exhibit alignment in lon- gitude of perihelion attributable to Planet Nine, these objects by necessity have lived in their current orbits for a significant length of time. In constructing the sta- bility posterior presented in Figure 4, we assumed that since significant, unbounded migration alters orbits and potentially disrupts this alignment, a migratory insta- bility provides equal information against Planet Nine's orbital elements as does a violent dynamical instability. In this way, we used migratory instabilities (such as those caused by large-a, low-e realizations of Planet Nine for 2007 TG422) as evidence against the iterations of Planet Nine that excited the migration. The TNOs affected by Planet Nine appear to fall into two categories: some of them (Sedna, 2012 VP113) are generally stable against this migratory process, while others (2007 TG422, 2013 RF98) can be easily caused to migrate in semi-major axis with an improperly cho- sen realization of Planet Nine. The best orbit of Planet Nine can be determined not only from the orbit-crossing constraint that rules out small-a, large-e orbits for all TNOs, but also by the constraint from this second pop- ulation of objects, which are unstable in the presence of large-a, low-e Planet Nine orbits (and are additionally unstable in the presence of no Planet Nine at all). These two populations explain the unintuitive structure of the posterior probability distribution given in Figure 4. Even though we require a Planet Nine iteration that does not cause the aligned TNOs to migrate significantly (more than 100 AU) over secular timescales, we expect there is a further population of objects that do migrate in the presence of Planet Nine. Indeed, some popula- tions of objects in our solar system can be explained by this process. Batygin & Brown (2016b) uses the nomi- nal Planet Nine orbit from Batygin & Brown (2016a) to explain the existence of a population of highly inclined KBOs with a ≤100: these objects can be explained as a migratory end-state of objects that started as members of the extreme TNO populations. The fact that some TNOs appear to experience migratory instabilities un- der the influence of Planet Nine is not inconsistent with our assumptions, but it does engender further questions. Clearly, some degree of migration is acceptable and will not alter the orbital alignment of the TNOs - the 100 AU threshold we use allows significant movement in semi- major axis without declaring objects dynamically unsta- ble. However, the fact that objects can migrate in semi- major axis but remain confined to a comparably narrow range (disallowing above 100 AU of migration does not allow objects to move into entirely different object pop- ulations as seen in Batygin & Brown 2016b) begs the question: how are objects moving when they migrate in what we have defined as a dynamically stable way? The answer to this question will be addressed in the following section. 5. PROXIMITY OF THE TNO ORBITS TO RESONANCES WITH PLANET NINE In the previous section, we identified that for some TNOs, migration in semi-major axis is an outcome for a significant fraction of integrations. In this section, we delve deeper into the nature of that migration and consider the question of resonance between the TNOs and Planet Nine. Specifically, if the TNOs migrate in semi-major axis, they are likely to pass through the lo- cations of mean-motion commensurabilities with Planet Nine, and one might expect the TNOs to fall into the stable configurations afforded by resonances, and stop migrating. The fact that proximity to resonance boosts dynami- cal stability can be directly applied to the Planet Nine - TNO system. In particular, Malhotra et al. (2016) con- sidered the possibility that Planet Nine should be at an orbital radius that would allow it to be closest to low- order resonances for several TNOs, based on the cur- rently measured orbits of those TNOs. The benefit to this configuration is that Planet Nine could stabilize the orbits of TNOs such as 2007 TG422, which might other- wise migrate in semi-major axis. Similarly, Millholland & Laughlin (2017) used numerical N-body simulations to determine the best orbit of Planet Nine by testing which locations close to resonances allow the observed alignment of the TNOs. Millholland & Laughlin (2017) found the best semi-major axis of Planet Nine to be a9 ∼ 654 AU (with a e9 ∼ 0.45), and Malhotra et al. (2016) found the best-fit orbit to have a semi-major axis of a9 ∼ 665 AU. Clearly, resonance is an important aspect of the Planet Nine problem, as suggested by Batygin & Brown (2016a), Beust (2016), Malhotra et al. (2016), and Millholland & Laughlin (2017). In Figure 7, we plot two histograms of the orbital period ratio (P9/PT N O) for each of the eight TNOs in our sample. In the top panel, we plot random draws from our initial conditions that were used to initialize the N-body simulations described in Section 2. The total number of draws in the top histogram was chosen to match the number of dynamically stable time- steps for each individual TNO, but the draws are from a raw distribution of the ratio P9/PT N O for all numerical trials, including those that are not dynamically stable. This top panel does not include the effect of certain ra- tios becoming more common due to gravitational inter- actions. In the bottom panel, we plot the dynamically 12 Becker et al. stable trials for each TNO, with the period ratio sam- pled every million years. The sharp peaks in this second histogram demonstrate clear overabundances of partic- ular period ratios P9/PT N O. These values occur near resonances -- in the trials where dynamical stability is found -- and is markedly different from the continuum of period ratios shown in the upper panel. Keep in mind that the initial conditions of our simulations were chosen independently of resonance locations, unlike the set of simulations in Millholland & Laughlin (2017). As a re- sult, the behavior shown in the figure indicates that sys- tems found to be dynamically stable in the simulations also show a clear preference for near-resonant locations. The results of this work show an important departure from the assumptions used previously (Malhotra et al. 2016; Millholland & Laughlin 2017). This earlier work assumes that the TNOs remain in a single resonant con- figuration over the lifetime of the Solar System. For ex- ample, Sedna might live in either the 9:8 or 6:5 mean motion commensurability, depending on the semi-major axis of Planet Nine, but it is considered to remain in a single resonance. In this approximation, the orbits of the extreme TNOs that we observe today are consistent with their past orbits. This assumption allows for the estimate found in Malhotra et al. (2016) to be carried out: if the TNOs reside in the same orbits over their en- tire lifetimes, and if they must be near resonance, then their current orbital properties can be used to compute the expected orbital elements of Planet Nine. However, our simulations show that TNOs do not always remain in the same orbits: Although they often remain near some resonance with Planet Nine, the TNOs change orbits and hence change resonances. In Figure 8, we plot time series for 2004 VN112 (top), 2007 TG422 (middle), and Sedna (bottom) to demon- strate the potential resonant outcomes. The behavior of 2004 VN112 is consistent with the assumption made by Malhotra et al. (2016) and Millholland & Laughlin (2017): that TNOs would live in a single resonance for the age of the solar system. The other two TNOs plot- ted in Figure 8 show behavior we call 'resonance hop- ping,' where a TNO attains multiple mean-motion com- mensurabilities over the course of the simulation. When liberated from one mean-motion commensurability, both TNOs are captured into another resonance instead of be- ing ejected from the system entirely. Planet Nine's semi- major axis did not change over the course of a single simulation, so all the change in P9/PT N O within a single integration is due to migration by the TNO. As illustrated in Figure 2, each TNO has a different dynamically stability map, preferring different regions of Planet Nine's potential parameter space. Similarly, when we take the subset of dynamically stable integrations for each TNO, each TNO has a different behavior relating to resonance. In this work, we take the definition of be- ing 'in' resonance to be living close to a resonant period ratio; as with the exoplanetary systems near resonance, the boost in dynamically stability provided by proximity to resonance applies even when systems are not in a per- fect resonance. Malhotra et al. (2016) and Millholland & Laughlin (2017) use a criterion for the proximity to Fig. 6. -- The lifetime of 2007 TG422 in the presence of realiza- tions of Planet Nine with semi major axis between 450 and 1200 AU, and eccentricities between 0 and 1. (top panel) Stability life- times when dynamical instability is only caused by violent ends for 2007 TG422, including collision with a solar system planet, collision with the sun, or ejection from the solar system (the outer bound- ary of which is defined to be 10000 AU). (middle panel) Stability lifetimes, when dynamical instability is caused by the violent end depicted in the top panel and also migration in semi-major axis by more than 100 AU. (bottom panel) The difference δt in stability lifetimes between the two cases, demonstrating which realizations of Planet Nine are most likely to cause 2007 TG422 to change its orbit significantly. Planet Nine realizations with low eccentricity and large semi-major axis cause 2007 TG422's orbit to migrate, but not meet with a violent end. 2007 TG422 Planet Nine Stability Survey 13 Fig. 7. -- (top panel) A sample of period ratios P9/PT N O, drawn from the initial conditions of the N-body simulations. This histogram shows the period ratio distribution that we would expect to see from the simulations if no period ratio were more dynamically stable than any other period ratio. This set serves as the control, and does not have the condition of dynamical stability imposed. (bottom panel) Period ratios P9/PT N O for the dynamically stable integrations at time-steps of one million years, demonstrating a peaked distribution, as some period ratios are preferred to others. In both panels, colors correspond to the values for each TNO, and the area of histograms was normalized. resonance that is close enough to afford such benefits: ∆ares ≈ 0.007aTNO m9aTNOA 3M(cid:12)a9 1/2 (10) when ∆ares is the width, in AU, of the band of space close enough to a resonance to count as being 'near' said res- onance, subscript T N O denotes the TNO's semi-major axis a and the subscript 9 denotes Planet Nine's semi- major axis a9 and mass m9. A is a unitless coefficient. We choose to use A = 3 as done in Malhotra et al. (2016) and Millholland & Laughlin (2017). The numerical value of ∆ares tends to be close to 5-10 AU for the TNOs in our sample, meaning that the simulation results allow us to determine the nearest resonance and identify TNOs that 'hop' between resonances. Figure 8 shows three ex- amples from our set of simulations: 2004 VN112 does not change resonances during the integration, 2007 TG422 changes resonances three times, and Sedna changes res- onance once. For two objects in our sample (2004 VN112 and 2012 VP113), we see no hopping behavior. However, it is important to note that the simulations used to construct Figure 7 and the curves in Figure 8 are the set run for this paper, which uses the quadrupole moment of the central part of the system (J2) to replace the active motions of Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus (JSU). This approximation allows the simulations in this work to be completed in a total of roughly 100,000 total CPU hours, rather than the nearly 2 million CPU hours that would be required to run the full integrations with all ac- tive giant planets. This approximation is appropriate for the tests of dynamical stability and alignment considered thus far in this work, but when considering the question of resonance, some discrepancies arise. In Figure 9, we present a comparison between a few test simulations run with the J2 approximation and the JSU case of active particles for Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus. The test sim- ulations were run for 1 Gyr each, with a single realization of Planet Nine (a = 700 AU, e = 0.5) and otherwise iden- tical to the cases run in the previous set of simulations. For the JSU set of simulations, we lowered the time-step to 20 days. When active JSU particles are included in the integra- tions, two major differences occur as compared to the J2 approximation: (1) the period ratios are not as tightly 024681012Period Ratio (P9/PTNO)02000400060008000100001200014000FrequencyInitial conditionsFT28GB174RF98SEDNASR349TG422VN112VP113123456Period Ratio (P9/PTNO)02000400060008000100001200014000Frequency311131147217452175225545141125236Dynamically stableFT28GB174RF98SEDNASR349TG422VN112VP11314 Becker et al. Fig. 8. -- For three integrations (top curve: 2004 VN112; middle curve: 2007 TG422; bottom curve: Sedna), we plot the period ratio P9/PT N O as function of simulation time. The numbers denote resonances within ∆ares of the semi-major axis of each TNO, at each time-step. The top time series, showing the evolution of 2004 VN112 during a typical integration, demonstrates how an object might remain in a single mean-motion commensurability for the entire lifetime of the solar system. The middle series, for 2007 TG422, shows the behavior we call 'resonance hopping,' where a TNO attains multiple mean-motion commensurabilities over the course of the simulation. The bottom series shows a less extreme version of this 'resonance hopping,' where Sedna switches between two commensurabilities during the solar system lifetime. In all cases, the period of Planet Nine does not change over the course of the simulation: it is the motion of the TNO that leads to changing values of P9/PT N O. confined, experiencing a larger degree of scatter even while living in a single apparent resonance; (2) the num- ber of times objects hop between resonances can be both increased (due to repeated accelerations from Uranus) and decreased (as shown in the top panel of Figure 9, hops we resolve in the J2 case are un-physical in the JSU case). Regarding point (1), the second panel of Figure 9 il- lustrates a case where in both the J2 and JSU cases, a TNO lives close to the 8/5 mean motion resonance. In the J2 case, the TNO stays within 0.3% of its average period ratio. In the JSU case, the TNO stays within 5% of its averege period ratio (this value is larger than in the J2 case due to the inclusion of accelerations from the inner three giant planets). Due to this complication, we have chosen the bin size in Figure 7 to be commensurate with the period ratio confinement experienced by TNOs in the JSU case, which is typically around 8%. Regarding point (2), it is unclear without running a large suite of JSU integrations how the hopping fre- quency changes with the inclusion of the giant planets. For this reason, we do not present in this work detailed results of the resonance hopping in our simulations. In order to accurately assess this behavior, a complete set of simulations with active giants planets (JSU) should be carried out. Our simulations show that dynamically stable integra- tions of the TNOs tend to attain mean-motion commen- surabilities. Depending on the TNO, it may attain a single resonant location and stay there, or it may hop between resonant locations. This 'resonance hopping' is an important effect, and for TNOs that exhibit this be- havior, their past semi-major axis may be different than the current values. The numerical computation of the Fig. 9. -- A check of our integrations (which used solar J2 in place of the inner three giant planets) and integrations run with active Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus (JSU) show that although both sets exhibit the same hopping behavior, the J2 approximation under- estimates the noise in period ratio and overestimates the degree to which the resonances can be differentiated. specifics of this behavior should be a fruitful avenue for future work. 6. CONCLUSIONS In this work, we have evaluated the dynamical sta- bility and orbital alignment of eight TNOs (Sedna, 2004 VN112, 2007 TG422, 2010 GB174, 2012 VP113, 2013 RF98, 2013 FT28, and 2014 SR349) in the presence of a Monte Carlo assortment of Planet Nine realizations with vary- ing semi-major axis and eccentricity. We used the results to predict the most probable (a, e) of Planet Nine by de- riving the posterior probability distributions for Planet Nine's orbital elements (a, e). The distribution based on dynamical stability considerations for the TNOs is pre- sented in Figure 4. We have also constructed an anal- ogous probability distribution based on the requirement that the orbits of the TNOs remain aligned. Both of these posterior distributions demonstrate that the pre- ferred orbits for Planet Nine have intermediate values of eccentricity (0.3 < e < 0.5) and semi-major axis (650 < a < 900 AU), as shown in Figure 5. Moreover, 0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.5Time (Gyr)1.01.52.02.53.03.5Period Ratio (P9/PTNO)2004 VN1123/12007 TG42217/87/311/52/1Sedna9/86/50.00.20.40.60.81.0Time (Gyr)3.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.9Period ratio (P9/PTNO)2013 FT28J-S-U active planetsJ2 approximation0.00.20.40.60.81.0Time (Gyr)1.351.401.451.501.551.601.651.701.751.80Period ratio (P9/PTNO)SednaJ-S-U active planetsJ2 approximation0.00.20.40.60.81.0Time (Gyr)1.52.02.53.03.54.0Period ratio (P9/PTNO)2010 GB174J-S-U active planetsJ2 approximationPlanet Nine Stability Survey 15 these values are roughly consistent with the regime sug- gested in Brown & Batygin (2016), which constructed its probability map using clustering arguments only. Our stability posterior and that from Brown & Batygin (2016) were constructed based on different fundamental orbital properties (dynamical stability and secular evolution pat- terns, respectively). Despite this significant difference in construction, the two results are consistent, in that they both prefer non-zero eccentricities and a similar range in semi-major axis for Planet Nine. The comparison be- tween our results and those of Brown & Batygin (2016) is shown in Figure 5. Notably, similar dynamical stabil- ity arguments in Millholland & Laughlin (2017) produce a best-fit Planet Nine of 654 AU and 0.45 eccentricity, which is consistent with the overlap region between the results of this work and of Brown & Batygin (2016). Using numerical N-body simulations, we also demon- strated that 2007 TG422 and 2013 RF98, while found in the past to be dynamically unstable in the presence of Neptune alone, can attain dynamically stable states in the presence of Planet Nine. Our simulation results sup- port the prediction of Sheppard & Trujillo (2016) that since 2007 TG422 and 2013 RF98 exhibit the same orbital clustering as the dynamically stable TNOs, Planet Nine likely dominates over Neptune interactions. In addition, we find that different TNOs exhibit very different sta- bility maps, with some objects (such as Sedna and 2012 VP113) contributing relatively little unique information to the stability posterior and others (such as 2007 TG422 and 2013 RF98) exhibiting unintuitive preference against large-a, low-e orbits of Planet Nine. These two categories suggest that there may be two dynamical classes of ob- jects in this TNO sample, which interact differently with Planet Nine. However, we have considered in this work only a small (N = 8) number of objects that fit into the desired high-a, trans-Neptunian-q, apsidally aligned category identified in Batygin & Brown (2016a). The dis- covery of additional objects in this population (expected in the near future) will allow for a more robust test of this two-population hypothesis. We have also evaluated the different dynamical out- comes for these extreme TNOs in the presence of Planet Nine. The objects that are dynamically unstable in the presence of large-a, low-e orbits of Planet Nine (2007 TG422 and 2013 RF98) tend to experience migration rather than violent collisions or ejections as their main outcome in dynamically unstable cases. These objects are also dynamically unstable in the presence of only Neptune and the other giant planets, i.e., in the absence of Planet Nine. In Table 1, we present the difference ¯δt in average dynamical lifetime between the case where mi- gration is considered to be a dynamical instability mech- anism and when it is not. Table 2 presents the relative occurrence rates for each type of outcome. For cases where the TNOs are not stable over the lifetime of the Solar System, the fraction of trials that lose objects to migration (with a > 100 AU), close encounters with giant planets, and ejection from the system are roughly com- parable. A small minority of the simulations end with accretion onto the Sun (less than 1%). Next, we suggest a generalized description for the inter- actions between the TNOs and Planet Nine. We propose that the paradigm is neither that (1) mean motion reso- nance is unimportant, nor (2) TNOs reside in a single res- onance with Planet Nine for the age of the solar system. Instead, while some TNOs (such as 2004 VN112 and 2012 VP113) can sometimes live in a single resonance for solar system lifetimes, others exhibit a behavior that we call 'resonance hopping.' This term means that the TNO is near-continually in close proximity to a mean motion res- onance (Figure 7), but it is not necessarily near the same resonance for the age of the Solar System (Figure 8). In- stead, the TNOs can transition between closely-spaced resonances, often those described by relatively large in- teger ratios. The long-term effect of this process is that the orbital anti-alignment caused by Planet Nine is able to persist, but the TNO is protected against small kicks in energy provided by interactions with Neptune. In this paradigm, an interaction with Neptune might lead to the movement of a TNO into a new resonance, but not to its ejection from the solar system (see also Malhotra et al. 2016; Millholland & Laughlin 2017). A useful avenue for future work would be the full numerical computation of this effect, as the J2 approximation used in this work precludes an accurate calculation of the true frequency of resonance hopping. Another important avenue for future work exists in our prediction that the eight TNOs considered in this work populate two distinct dynamical classes: first, a class of objects such as 2012 VP113 or Sedna, which are more dynamically stable in the presence of large a, low e real- izations of Planet Nine (which reduce closely to the case of having no ninth planet); second, a class of objects that are dynamically unstable in the presence of only Neptune and no Planet Nine (and also in the case of a high-a, low- e Planet Nine). This second class of objects may have higher e and a than the first, and require a stabilizing influence in the form of an eccentric Planet Nine to pre- vent destabilizing interactions with Neptune. To truly understand if this is a valid division, it is hoped that a large number of high-a, trans-Neptunian-q, apsidally aligned TNOs will be discovered in the next few years. The classification of these objects, and exploration of the mechanism by which Planet Nine may stabilize their or- bits, should be explored in the future. We thank Konstantin Batygin for a thorough review of the manuscript and many useful suggestions. We thank Andrew Vanderburg, Sarah Millholland, Jaehan Bae, Marina Kounkel, and Ellen Price for useful con- versations. We thank Michael Dieterle and Clara Eng for helpful suggestions on how to effectively visualize the simulation results. We also thank Gary Bernstein for re- viewing the manuscript and suggesting several improve- ments. Finally, we thank the referee for many useful comments that improved the paper. This work was sup- ported by NSF Grant AST-1515015. J.C.B and S.J.H. are also supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fel- lowship Grant No. DGE 1256260. The computations for this work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), which is supported by National Science Foundation grant number ACI-1053575. This research was done using resources provided by the Open Science Grid, which is supported by the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science. 16 Becker et al. REFERENCES Alexandersen, M., Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J. J., et al. 2014, Holman, M. J., & Payne, M. J. 2016, ArXiv e-prints, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1411.7953 arXiv:1604.03180 Bailey, E., Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. 2016, ArXiv e-prints, Horner, J., Lykawka, P. S., Bannister, M. T., & Francis, P. 2012, arXiv:1607.03963 MNRAS, 422, 2145 Bannister, M. T., Kavelaars, J. J., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2016, AJ, Jones, E., Oliphant, T., Peterson, P., et al. 2001, SciPy: Open 152, 70 Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. 2016a, AJ, 151, 22 -- . 2016b, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1610.04992 Becker, A. C., Arraki, K., Kaib, N. A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, L53 Beust, H. 2016, A&A, 590, L2 Brown, M. E., & Batygin, K. 2016, ApJ, 824, L23 Brown, M. E., Trujillo, C., & Rabinowitz, D. 2004, ApJ, 617, 645 Chambers, J. E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793 Chen, Y.-T., Kavelaars, J. J., Gwyn, S., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, L8 Chen, Y.-T., Lin, H. W., Holman, M. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 827, L24 source scientific tools for Python, [Online; accessed 2016-10-24] Lai, D. 2016, AJ, 152, 215 Lawler, S. M., Shankman, C., Kaib, N., et al. 2016, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1605.06575 Li, G., & Adams, F. C. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 344 -- . 2016, ApJ, 823, L3 Lin, H. W., Chen, Y.-T., Holman, M. J., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 147 Lykawka, P. S., & Mukai, T. 2007, Icarus, 189, 213 Malhotra, R., Volk, K., & Wang, X. 2016, ApJ, 824, L22 Mardling, R. A. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2187 McKinney, W. 2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, Abbott, T., Abdalla, F. B., Conference, ed. S. van der Walt & J. Millman, 51 -- 56 et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1270 de la Fuente Marcos, C., de la Fuente Marcos, R., & Aarseth, S. J. 2016, MNRAS, 460, L123 Fienga, A., Laskar, J., Manche, H., & Gastineau, M. 2016, A&A, Millholland, S., & Laughlin, G. 2017, AJ, 153, 91 Morbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. 2004, AJ, 128, 2564 Nesvorn´y, D., & Roig, F. 2001, Icarus, 150, 104 Petit, J.-M., Kavelaars, J. J., Gladman, B. J., et al. 2011, AJ, 587, L8 142, 131 Gerdes, D. W., Jennings, R. J., Bernstein, G. M., et al. 2016, AJ, Sheppard, S. S., & Trujillo, C. 2016, ArXiv e-prints, 151, 39 arXiv:1608.08772 Gerdes, D. W., Sako, M., Hamilton, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 839, L15 Gomes, R., Deienno, R., & Morbidelli, A. 2017, AJ, 153, 27 Guan, P., Zhou, L.-Y., & Li, J. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Towns, J., Cockerill, T., Dahan, M., et al. 2014, Computing in Science and Engineering, 16, 62 Trujillo, C. A., & Sheppard, S. S. 2014, Nature, 507, 471 Astrophysics, 12, 1549 A. APPENDIX: PRECESSION EQUATIONS OF MOTION FOR TNOS To consider the secular motion of the TNOs in the presence of Planet Nine, we can treat the problem with a coplanar approximation, as done in Batygin & Brown (2016a). It is important to note that this is a very rough approximation, as the TNOs and Planet Nine are expected to be inclined relative to the inner solar system and each other. The Hamiltonian for this system, as used in Batygin & Brown (2016a), is: H = − 1 4 GM a (1 − e2)−3/2 (cid:19) (cid:18) mia2 i M a2 4(cid:88) i=1 (cid:20) 1 (cid:18) a (cid:19)2 1 + 3e2/2 − Gm9 a9 4 a9 (1 − e2 9)3/2 − 15 16 (cid:18) a (cid:19)3 a9 ee9 1 + 3e2/4 (1 − e2 9)5/2 cos (ω9 − ω) (11) when M is the mass of the central body, the subscript 9 denotes the properties of Planet Nine, the subscript i within the summation in the first term denotes the four giant planets, and a lack of subscript denotes the TNO for which the Hamiltonian is being written. 1 − e2, we can find the equation of motion for the argument of perihelion ω by taking Using canonical variable = the derivative of Equation 11, such that dω/dt ∝ dH/d. The result of this yields √ (cid:21) (cid:21) ∝ dω dt mia2 i (e2−1)−2a−2− 15 16 m9 e9 e (1−9e2/4) cos(ω−ω9)− 3 4 m9 (cid:19)4 √ (cid:18) a a9 1 − e2 9)5/2 (1 − e2 (cid:19)3 √ (cid:18) a a9 1 − e2 9)3/2 (1 − e2 , (12) (cid:20) 3 4(cid:88) 4 i=1 when leading constants have been dropped, since in this work we care only about the relative contributions of the terms of the equation of motion. The first term of Equation 12 represents the apsidal precession of a TNO with orbital elements (a, e, ω) that is caused by the inner solar system (where the outer four giant planets are treated as a solar oblateness and the terrestrial planets ignored). The latter two terms of Equation 12 include dependences on the mass of Planet Nine (m9), eccentricity of Planet Nine (e9), semi-major axis of Planet Nine (a9), and argument of perihelion of Planet Nine (e9). These two terms represent the apsidal precession of the TNO due to Planet Nine's influence. Alone, the influence of Planet Nine or of the inner solar system would lead to precession of each TNO's ω. Taken together, the two precession terms can either boost precession rates or slow them. With the proper choice of orbital elements for Planet Nine, dω/dt can be set to be zero, leading to no net precession relative to the Katti-Range vector of Planet Nine's orbit. Such a situation could result in a selection of TNOs exhibiting orbits that remain in roughly the same regime of parameter space over time, potentially leading to alignment like that observed in the TNOs in our solar system. For completeness, we note that Equation 12 can also be derived from the disturbing function using Lagrange's planetary equations. We use the disturbing function as formulated in Mardling (2013), which is written to work in the dimensions of energy. The disturbing function can be written as R = − 1 4 GM m a (1− e2)−3/2 + Gm9m a9 1 4 (cid:19) (cid:18) mia2 i M a2 4(cid:88) i=1 Planet Nine Stability Survey (cid:34) (cid:18) a (cid:19)2 1 + 3/2e2 a9 (1 − e2 9)3/2 (cid:18) a a9 − 15 e e9 16 (cid:19)3 1 + 3e2/4 (1 − e2 9)5/2 17 (cid:21)(cid:35) , cos(ω − ω9) (13) This equation has been simplified under the assumption m << mp << M . We can use Lagrange's planetary equations to find the equation of motion analogous to that in Equation 12. Specifically: dω dt = mνa2e dR de (cid:19)4 √ (cid:18) a a9 1 − e2 9)5/2 (1 − e2 (14) (cid:21) , (cid:19)3 √ (cid:18) a a9 1 − e2 9)3/2 (1 − e2 (cid:20) 3 4(cid:88) 4 i=1 when ν is the orbital frequency of the TNO. Substituting Equation 13 into the relevant Lagrange equation (Equation 14) yields the full equation of motion: dω dt = m9ν M mia2 i (e2 − 1)−2a−2 − 15 16 m9 e9 e (1− 9e2/4) cos(ω − ω9)− 3 4 m9 (15) which is equivalent to the result presented in Equation 12. It is very important to note that the preceding derivation makes several major approximations: • We assume a coplanar system and neglect orbital inclination of all bodies, • In the construction of the Hamiltonian and the disturbing function, we ignore all short-order, resonant terms4 For all of these reasons, this analytic result should be treated as approximate. To do the problem properly, it is important to use numerical N-body simulations. B. APPENDIX: EFFECTS OF ALLOWING ORBITAL ELEMENTS TO VARY IN N-BODY SIMULATIONS In the set of N-body simulations that we describe in Section 2 and use to construct the posterior probability distribution given in Section 3, we use a population of Planet Nine realizations with fixed inclination i = 30 degrees, argument of perihelion ω = 150 degrees, and longitude of the ascending node Ω = 113 degrees. This was done because the amount of uncertainty in each of these measurements would require a computationally unfeasible number of integrations to well-sample the parameter space. Instead, we chose the approximate best values for each angle, as reported and used in prior literature. However, we can recreate the probability posterior presented in Figure 4 for an additional set of 1500 N-body integrations, while allowing these orbital angles to vary, and examine the amount of difference between this new posterior and the old one as a first test. To do this, we ran 1500 more numerical N-body integrations with the same numerical properties as our other set (hybrid symplectic and Bulirsch-Stoer (B-S) integrator in Mercury6 (Chambers 1999), conserving energy to 1 part in 1010, replacing the three inner giant planets with a solar J2, including each TNO with orbital elements drawn from observational constraints). In this set of integrations, we sampled a9 from a uniform range between (400, 1200) AU, and e9 between (0,1). However, instead of fixing the orbital angles, we sampled from normal distributions centered on the Batygin & Brown (2016a) estimates (i9 = 30 degrees, ω9 = 150 degrees, Ω9 = 113 degrees) with widths of 30 degrees in each case. Then, we integrated each of the 1500 realizations forward for 4.5 Gyr. The results of this new, second suite of integrations is presented in Figure 10, which can be directly compared to Figure 4 (which was constructed with our original set of simulations). Comparing the two figures presents three major conclusions: [1] The main parameter space preferred in each set is similar, with high eccentricities being less preferred and the range from 0.3-0.5 eccentricity, 600-1000 AU being good in both sets. [2] The overall survival probabilities are lower for the case where Planet Nine's orbital angles are allowed to vary, which indicates that altering these values too much decreases dynamical stability of the TNOs overall. [3] The posterior presented in Figure 10, with varying orbital angles, has less variation between peaks and valleys, which is the danger of adding additional layers of variation (which we did by allowing three orbital angles to vary). The reason that we do not use this set of simulations that allow initial orbital angles of Planet Nine to vary as the main set in this paper is that the parameter space is not well-sampled. Additionally, the three additional free parameters bring with them three additional sources of variations. The robust exploration of this parameter space is outside the scope of this work. 4 and as shown in Section 5, this is probably dangerous to do 18 Becker et al. Fig. 10. -- The overall stability posterior for the semi-major axis and eccentricity of Planet Nine, when Planet Nine's orbital angles were allowed to vary over a normal distribution centered on the best-guess values. This posterior was constructed by taking a summation of the posteriors for each individual object, including the six objects used in Batygin & Brown (2016a) and the two new high-a, low-e objects from Sheppard & Trujillo (2016). As compared to Figure 4, which did not allow the orbital angles to vary, the survival probability is lower when orbital angles are allowed to vary, suggesting that the best-guess values leading to more probable alignment also lead to more dynamically stable configurations.
1802.05034	2	1802	2018-07-03T14:14:37	Cometary impactors on the TRAPPIST-1 planets can destroy all planetary atmospheres and rebuild secondary atmospheres on planets f, g, h	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The TRAPPIST-1 system is unique in that it has a chain of seven terrestrial Earth-like planets located close to or in its habitable zone. In this paper, we study the effect of potential cometary impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets and how they would affect the primordial atmospheres of these planets. We consider both atmospheric mass loss and volatile delivery with a view to assessing whether any sort of life has a chance to develop. We ran N-body simulations to investigate the orbital evolution of potential impacting comets, to determine which planets are more likely to be impacted and the distributions of impact velocities. We consider three scenarios that could potentially throw comets into the inner region (i.e within 0.1au where the seven planets are located) from an (as yet undetected) outer belt similar to the Kuiper belt or an Oort cloud: Planet scattering, the Kozai-Lidov mechanism and Galactic tides. For the different scenarios, we quantify, for each planet, how much atmospheric mass is lost and what mass of volatiles can be delivered over the age of the system depending on the mass scattered out of the outer belt. We find that the resulting high velocity impacts can easily destroy the primordial atmospheres of all seven planets, even if the mass scattered from the outer belt is as low as that of the Kuiper belt. However, we find that the atmospheres of the outermost planets f, g and h can also easily be replenished with cometary volatiles (e.g. $\sim$ an Earth ocean mass of water could be delivered). These scenarios would thus imply that the atmospheres of these outermost planets could be more massive than those of the innermost planets, and have volatiles-enriched composition.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–28 (2002) Printed 4 July 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Cometary impactors on the TRAPPIST-1 planets can destroy all planetary atmospheres and rebuild secondary atmospheres on planets f, g, h Quentin Kral,1(cid:63) Mark C. Wyatt,1 Amaury H.M.J. Triaud,1,2 Sebastian Marino, 1 Philippe Th´ebault, 3 Oliver Shorttle, 1,4 1Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 2School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK 3LESIA-Observatoire de Paris, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris-Diderot, France 4Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK Accepted 1928 December 15. Received 1928 December 14; in original form 1928 October 11 ABSTRACT The TRAPPIST-1 system is unique in that it has a chain of seven terrestrial Earth-like planets located close to or in its habitable zone. In this paper, we study the effect of potential cometary impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets and how they would affect the primordial atmospheres of these planets. We consider both atmospheric mass loss and volatile delivery with a view to assessing whether any sort of life has a chance to develop. We ran N-body simulations to investigate the orbital evolution of potential impacting comets, to determine which planets are more likely to be impacted and the distributions of impact velocities. We consider three scenarios that could potentially throw comets into the inner region (i.e within 0.1au where the seven planets are located) from an (as yet undetected) outer belt similar to the Kuiper belt or an Oort cloud: Planet scattering, the Kozai-Lidov mechanism and Galactic tides. For the different scenarios, we quantify, for each planet, how much atmospheric mass is lost and what mass of volatiles can be delivered over the age of the system depending on the mass scattered out of the outer belt. We find that the resulting high velocity impacts can easily destroy the primordial atmospheres of all seven planets, even if the mass scattered from the outer belt is as low as that of the Kuiper belt. However, we find that the atmospheres of the outermost planets f, g and h can also easily be replenished with cometary volatiles (e.g. ∼ an Earth ocean mass of water could be delivered). These scenarios would thus imply that the atmospheres of these outermost planets could be more massive than those of the innermost planets, and have volatiles- enriched composition. Key words: accretion, accretion discs atmospheres low mass stars (TRAPPIST-1) circumstellar matter Planetary Systems. 8 1 0 2 l u J 3 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 4 3 0 5 0 . 2 0 8 1 : v i X r a 1 INTRODUCTION (d=12pc) M8V ultra-cool dwarf The nearby star TRAPPIST-1 (2MASS J23062928-0502285) is now known to be surrounded by at least seven terrestrial-like planets (Gillon et al. 2016, 2017; Luger et al. 2017). This old (7.6±2.2 Gyr, Burgasser & Mamajek 2017), close-by, multi-planetary system may offer one of our best chances to study the chemistry, and structure of terrestrial planet atmospheres outside our Solar System (de Wit et al. 2016; Morley et al. 2017). Moreover, several of the TRAPPIST-1 (cid:63) E-mail: [email protected] c(cid:13) 2002 RAS f and g, Gillon et al. planets (most likely planets e, 2017) lie within the liquid water habitable zone (HZ, e.g. O'Malley-James & Kaltenegger 2017). However, the presence of liquid water and possible life strongly depends on the atmospheric content of these planets, the presence of oceans, the vegetation coverage, etc. (e.g. Wolf 2017; Alberti et al. 2017; Ehlmann et al. 2016; Carone et al. 2016; Godolt et al. 2016). This system being very close-by, we may soon be able to start characterising the atmospheres of the seven plan- ets with new telescopes such as JWST (Barstow & Irwin 2016; O'Malley-James & Kaltenegger 2017) and the E-ELT (Rodler & L´opez-Morales 2014; Turbet et al. 2016) and 2 Q. Kral et al. search for tracers of life. Such detailed spectral characterisa- tion may eventually allow us to infer the presence of biologi- cal activity via the detection of gases such as ozone (Barstow & Irwin 2016), or via the spectral signatures of pigmented micro-organisms (Poch et al. 2017). Regardless, such ob- servations will inform on the atmospheric compositions of these planets that is necessary to study the possibility that life may develop. For now, little is known about the atmospheres of these seven planets. The two innermost planets b and c have been observed using transmission spectroscopy (de Wit et al. 2016). This showed that the combined spectrum of both planets (obtained when transiting at the same time) is featureless, which favours atmospheres that are tenous (composed of a variety of chemical species), not hydrogen- dominated, dominated by aerosols or non-existent. Similar conclusions have been made for planets d, e, f (and poten- tially g) by de Wit et al. (2018). Also, from the combined measurement of planet radii (transit) and masses (transit timing variations), the derived planets' densities show that TRAPPIST-1 b, d, f, g, and h may require envelopes of volatiles in the form of thick atmospheres, oceans, or ice (Grimm et al. 2018). We thus do not know yet information that would be important for considering the habitability of the planets such as whether these planets' atmospheres are primordial or created later, for instance by cometary im- pacts, although current observations suggest that current atmospheres may not be primordial due to a lack of hydro- gen signatures in the observed spectra (de Wit et al. 2018). Previous theoretical studies of the atmospheric compo- sition of the TRAPPIST-1 planets have shown that they may vary with time and be affected by the early evolution of the star. Indeed, ultra-cool dwarfs such as TRAPPIST-1 take up to 1Gyr to cool down (Baraffe et al. 2015) and reach the main-sequence after the planets formed. This means that planets that are today in the HZ would have undergone a very hot pre-main-sequence era (with potentially a runaway greenhouse phase) and may have lost all (or part) of their initial water content (Bolmont et al. 2017). Moreover, Bour- rier et al. (2017) find that the total XUV emission from the star might be strong enough to entirely strip the primordial atmospheres of the planets over a few Gyr. One could then expect that a few of the TRAPPIST-1 planets are devoid of atmospheres, or left with a gas layer too tenuous for life to persist over long timescales (Roettenbacher & Kane 2017). Here we consider another process that can strongly in- fluence the atmospheres, both positively and negatively for life: exocomets. Impacting exocomets can influence planetary atmospheres in multiple ways: a) they can provide an energy source that depletes primordial atmospheres. b) They might also deliver volatiles that subsequently replenish a secondary atmosphere (i.e., dry, depleted atmospheres from impacts or XUV irradiation could be replenished by later impacts, and surviving primordial atmospheres could see their ele- mental abundances significantly transformed via exocomet impacts). c) Impacting exocomets may also act as catalysts for the development of life. Indeed, these impacts may ini- tiate a cascade of chemical reactions, some of which can produce the necessary precursors to nucleobases on these planets (Saladino et al. 2012; Ferus et al. 2015; Patel et al. 2015; Sutherland 2017; Ranjan et al. 2017). For now, there is no evidence of exocomets in the TRAPPIST-1 system, however, this does not mean they are not present and part of the motivation of this work is to de- termine if evidence for such a population may be imprinted on the planets' atmospheres. Many stars have large outer reservoirs of planetesimals that produce a detectable infrared excess due to collisional production of dust (Wyatt 2008; Eiroa et al. 2013). Detec- tions of CO gas in several systems are used to infer that these planetesimals are icy with a composition that is simi- lar to Solar System comets (e.g. Kral et al. 2016; Marino et al. 2016; Matr`a et al. 2017a). These planetesimal belts are harder to detect around low mass stars such as TRAPPIST- 1 due to their low luminosity but this does not mean they are not present (Plavchan et al. 2009; Theissen & West 2014). Some stars also have evidence that comets from these outer regions are being scattered into the inner regions. For exam- ple, CO detected at 20au in η Corvi is inferred to originate in the sublimation of such an exocomet population(Marino et al. 2017). In addition, high-velocity metallic gas absorption lines in some systems (Montgomery & Welsh 2012; Kiefer et al. 2014; Eiroa et al. 2016) are inferred to originate in very eccentric comets passing very close to their host star (called falling evaporating bodies, e.g. Beust et al. 1990). Thus, it is not unreasonable that TRAPPIST-1 has (or indeed may have had) comets at some level. In this study, we hypothesize that such comets exist in the TRAPPIST-1 system and use previous studies that looked at the effect of impacts onto planetary atmospheres (e.g. de Niem et al. 2012; Schlichting et al. 2015), and espe- cially hydrodynamical simulations (Shuvalov 2009) to derive some constraints on the TRAPPIST-1 planets' atmospheres in the presence of impacting comets. We start by estimating the possible mass of a planetes- imal belt that could have survived around TRAPPIST-1. In Sec. 3, we then study the dynamics of comets in the TRAPPIST-1 system that come close to the seven plan- ets, i.e within 0.1au. Notably, we look into which planet will receive most impacts, at which velocity and derive the timescales on which impacts happen. In Sec. 4, we describe three plausible scenarios that can potentially scatter many exocomets over the lifetime of the system. In Sec. 5, we show the results of our model, i.e how much atmospheric mass is removed from the primordial atmospheres of the seven plan- ets by a continuous series of impacts and evaluate whether those impacts increase or reduce the amount of volatiles in the planets' atmospheres, and what kind of atmosphere each planet is likely to end up with. We then discuss our results in terms of their implications for the development of life in Sec. 6 before concluding. 2 THE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF A DISC AROUND TRAPPIST-1 This paper is based on the potential presence of a yet unde- tected debris disc around TRAPPIST-1. To consider what this debris disc might look like, we construct a minimum mass extrasolar nebula for the TRAPPIST-1 system sim- ilar to Hayashi (1981), or Chiang & Laughlin (2013) who used 1925 extrasolar planets to constrain the minimum sur- face densities at different distances from the star assuming planets formed in situ. c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 Effects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 3 yr (Wyatt 2008). This gives tc ∼ 4 × 103(r/1au)4.3yr by as- suming typical values (as in Wyatt 2008; Kral et al. 2017c, i.e e = 0.05, Q(cid:63) D = 500J/kg, Dc=100km). In other words, a belt at 1au would be significantly depleted after 7Gyr (the age of the system) of collisional evolution and we expect any belt this close in to have been significantly depleted. How- ever, a belt at >28au could survive over 7Gyr. At shorter radii, the mass that remains after collisional evolution for 7Gyr would be expected to have a radial profile that scales ∝ r7/3 (Kennedy & Wyatt 2010) as shown by the red dotted line in Fig. 1. While this formula depends on many uncertain parameters, it shows that we expect any potential surviving belt to be located at (cid:38) 10au. Using the extrapolation in Eq. 1, we expect such a left- over belt between 10 and 50au to have a mass of ∼20M⊕, which is compatible with the predicted large initial mass of the protoplanetary disc around TRAPPIST-1 required to have formed the seven planets (Haworth et al. 2018). While this is at least two orders of magnitude more massive than the Kuiper belt (Fraser & Kavelaars 2009; Vitense et al. 2010), note that the Kuiper belt is thought to have formed much more massive, with a solid mass of 20-40M⊕ com- patible with the MMSN (e.g. Weidenschilling 1977; Hayashi 1981; Nesvorn´y & Morbidelli 2012, but see Shannon et al. 2016 for a dissenting view). The left-over belt is not ex- pected to extend much farther than 50-100au because pro- toplanetary discs around low-mass stars are less extended than around T-Tauri stars (Hendler et al. 2017). One caveat to this estimate is that our approach is only accurate for an in situ formation of the seven planets. For planets that formed further out close to the water iceline as suggested by Ormel et al. (2017), the surface density would go down by a factor 10 at most and so would the belt mass leading to an estimate of (cid:38)2M⊕. The only observation of TRAPPIST-1 in the infrared is by WISE at 22µm (Patel et al. 2017), which shows no signs of infrared excess. However, any belt that is warm enough to emit at 22µm would have to be inside 10au and so, as noted above, would be expected to be collisionally depleted. The only region where significant mass is expected to re- main at 7Gyr is beyond 10au, where such a belt would be < 15K (assuming a black body) and therefore its emission would peak at λ > 340µm. This WISE observation is thus not constraining and observations at longer wavelengths are required to constrain such a cold belt, for instance using the ALMA interferometer. 3 DYNAMICS OF IMPACTS FOR COMETS COMING FROM AN OUTER BELT There are many possible origins for the comets that may impact planets b to h. Rather than studying the details of the specific evolution for each scenario, we will start by as- suming that very eccentric comets are produced and we will study their dynamics and look at their interactions with the seven planets. This framework is therefore general as soon from the collisional cascade have a large enough collision velocity that they can fragment after an impact. Depending on the level of stirring, using this formula for radii (cid:38)50au is therefore not accurate and only gives a lower limit on the timescale tc. Figure 1. Surface density in the TRAPPIST-1 system assuming a minimum mass extrasolar nebula and extrapolating to tens of au to obtain a plausible mass that would be left in a potential, yet undetected, belt. In red, we show the predicted profile after 7Gyr of collisional evolution. To get a surface density for each planet, we take the planet mass and divide it by the area of the annulus around the planet. For planets c to g, we define the annulus as being between the two midpoints to the neighbouring planets. For planets b and h, we work out the half width using the centres between planets b and c and between planets g and h and multiply that width by two. This gives the following surface density (in solids) after fitting the data (see Fig. 1) (cid:16) r (cid:17)−1.97 1au Σ ∼ 122 kg/m2, (1) where r is the distance to the star. Our fit of Σ provides values a factor 4 smaller than Chiang & Laughlin (2013) at 1au (who used a large sample of Kepler planets around earlier-type stars) but steeper in r and very close to the fit by Gaidos (2017) who did it specifically for M-dwarf Kepler planets. It is less than a factor 2 from the minimum mass solar nebula (MMSN) in solids for terrestrial planets at 1au (Hayashi 1981). The H2O iceline during planetesimal formation is es- timated to have been close to ∼0.1au in the TRAPPIST-1 system (Ormel et al. 2017). It could as well have been slightly closer-in (by a factor ∼2) based on the (still not-well con- strained) gradient of water compositions of the 7 planets (Unterborn et al. 2018). We assumed that beyond 0.1au, the solid {rock+ice} surface density is a factor 4 higher fol- lowing Hayashi (1981). We can now extrapolate the mass that may be present at several au and potentially form a disc of planetesimals rather than planets. A planetesimal belt at a radius r with dr/r ∼ 0.5 would have a mass of ∼ 12.6(r/1au)0.03M⊕. The collisional life- time of the biggest planetesimals in such a belt is given by1 tc = 1.4 × 10−3 r13/3(dr/r)DcQ(cid:63)5/6 /Mtot D e−5/3M −4/3 (cid:63) 1 We note that this formula can be used when the largest bodies c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 10−210−1100101102Distancetothestar(au)10−210−1100101102103104105106107Surfacedensity(kg/m2)dataFitExtrapolationAfter7Gyr4 Q. Kral et al. as eccentric comets are produced and will be tied to spe- cific scenarios (planet scattering, Kozai-Lidov mechanism or Galactic tides) in Sec. 4. The pericentre q of the eccentric comets we model can reach a few tenths to hundredths of au where they can collide with one of the seven detected planets around TRAPPIST- 1. The apocentre Q can vary from a few au (for comets that originate in close-in belts) to > 100s of au for comets coming from very cold outer belts or exo-Oort clouds. We perform N-body simulations of these very eccentric orbits assuming that the evolution is dominated by perturbations from the known TRAPPIST-1 planets to understand how their fate depends on the comet's orbital parameters q (pericentre) and Q (apocentre). That is, for each of these different comet families (i.e for a given set of {q,Q}) we determine the frac- tion that is accreted onto the different planets and the frac- tion that is ejected. We also compute impact velocities for each family of comets, which are used in Sec. 5 to assess if cometary impacts are able to destroy planetary atmospheres and if delivery of volatiles from these comets is possible. 3.1 N-body simulations of impacts with the seven planets The N-body simulations are run with REBOUND (Rein & Liu 2012) with the Hermes integrator which combines the IAS15 integrator for close encounters within a few Hill radii of the planets (Rein & Spiegel 2015) and uses the WHFast integrator otherwise (Rein & Tamayo 2015). The simulations include the seven planets orbiting around the central star TRAPPIST-1 (see Tab. 1 for the parameters used). We use a timestep of 5% of planet b's orbital timescale. We assumed zero eccentricities for the planets as the 2σ upper limits are low (< 0.09 as implied by tidal forces and orbital stability, Gillon et al. 2017; Tamayo et al. 2017; Quarles et al. 2017). The planets gravitationally interact with each other, but their orbits do not evolve significantly over the course of all our simulations. We start each simulation with 2000 test particles that all have a similar pericentre and apocentre {q,Q} spread in a narrow range defined by a grid (see Fig. 2). We run the sim- ulations until all test particles have either been ejected from the system (i.e., if their positions go beyond 100 times the initial comet's apocentre) or accreted onto the planets or the star. We note however that almost no particles collide with the central star. This is because for high-eccentricity orbits the pericentres will be locked and for low-eccentricity orbits, we notice that there are very few scattering events that could potentially send the comets onto the star. Rather, the parti- cles tend to be accreted or ejected by the planet close to their pericentres. We assumed zero inclination, which we expect to be unrealistic but leads to much faster simulations and can be scaled a posteriori to give results for a comet-like inclination distribution (see subsection 3.5). Running the simulations assuming a zero inclination angle was necessary to allow the simulations to be performed in a reasonable timescale (i.e., not exceeding two months). The whole set of 900 simulations took ∼2 months on 20 CPUs, whereas inclined comets would have taken almost two years to com- pute. This is because we ran each simulation until there are no particles left. As the time to accrete/eject particles is much smaller in the zero inclination case, we gain a factor greater than 10 in overall computational time. We note that of the results we derive in this section, the probability map as well as the accretion/ejection timescales are affected (in a quantifiable way) by a change in inclination but not the impact velocities (subsection 3.4). We ran a grid of 900 N-body simulations for a wide range of {q,Q} values, with 90 logarithmically-spaced bins in pericentre covering 10−3au < q < 10−1au and 10 logarithmically-spaced bins in apocentre covering 10−1au < Q < 102au, which form the grid seen in Fig. 2. The grid is defined by the pericentres and apocentres at the start of the simulations. The TRAPPIST-1 planets are located between 0.01 and 0.06au (white vertical lines in Fig. 2) so that the chosen range of pericentres is large enough to follow what happens when the comets' orbits cross those of the planets. 3.2 Probability to impact the different planets or to be ejected for comet-like orbits Fig. 2 shows a map of the probability to impact the differ- ent planets (each inset is for a given planet, planet b to h from left to right), while Fig. 3 shows the probability to be ejected for each given {q,Q} of our parameter space. Some of the large scale features in these figures can be readily understood. For example, the extended black regions in Fig. 2 at large pericentres are because in order for a comet to collide with a given planet, the comet's pericentre must be smaller than the planet's semi-major axis apla. Since the pericen- tre and apocentre of comets do not evolve significantly from their starting values, this means that the region of the pa- rameter space with q > apla appears in black. Comets with such pericentres collide with the more distant planets. Another large scale feature is that the probability to im- pact one of the planets is higher for smaller cometary apoc- entres. This can be explained by looking at Fig. 3 which shows that the ejection rate goes up with increasing Q, not- ing that the sum of the impact probabilities over the seven planets and the ejection probability equals 1. The increased ejection probability seen in Fig. 3 with Q (for all pericentres) is because the comet's energy (∼ GM(cid:63)/Q) is lower for these larger apocentres and so a comet is ejected by a smaller kick when passing by a planet. The biggest kick in velocity that the comet can receive from a planet (without colliding onto it) is roughly equal to vesc (Wyatt et al. 2017), where vesc is the escape velocity of the planet. The resulting increase in the comet's orbital energy can be enough to unbind the comet if vorbvesc > GM(cid:63)/Q, where the comet's orbital velocity vorb close to a planet is (cid:115) vcom ∼ 2GM(cid:63) apla , (2) which leads to the apocentre value Q where ejections start becoming dominant (cid:18) M(cid:63) (cid:19)1/2(cid:18) Mpla 0.08M(cid:12) 1M⊕ Q (cid:29) 0.2 (cid:19)−1/2(cid:18) Rpla (cid:16) apla 1R⊕ (cid:19)1/2 (cid:17)1/2 0.03au au, (3) c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 Table 1. Table describing the parameters used for the N-body simulations of the TRAPPIST-1 system (from Gillon et al. 2017; Luger et al. 2017). Effects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 5 Star mass (M(cid:12)) Star radius (R(cid:12)) 0.0802 0.117 Planets Semi-major axis apla (10−3 au) Radius Rpla (R⊕) Mass Mpla (M⊕) b c d e f g h 11.11 1.086 0.85 15.21 1.056 1.38 21.44 0.772 0.41 28.17 0.918 0.62 37.1 1.045 0.68 45.1 1.127 1.34 59.6 0.755 0.411 1 The mass of planet h is not well constrained (Luger et al. 2017) and as its radius is similar to that of planet d, we assume the same mass as planet d. Figure 2. Map showing the probability to impact (from left to right) planets b to h for each family of orbits defined by a given pericentre q and apocentre Q. The vertical white lines show the positions of planets b to h. The white background colour is used to show the part of the parameter space that have pericentres too far from the planets to either collide or be ejected. On the contrary, the black colour is for orbits that collide with a low probability (cid:54) 10−2. where Mpla, Rpla and apla are the planet mass, radius and semi-major axis, respectively. This calculation explains why Fig. 3 shows that for Q (cid:38) 1au, ejection is the more likely outcome. Another feature in Fig. 2 is that for pericentres inside planet b, the accretion probability is higher for planets closer to the star. In fact, the accretion probability decreases as pla from planet b to h for a fixed {q, Q} in this regime. −1 a This can be explained by the different accretion timescales of each planet as showed in Sec. 3.3. Finally, another noticeable feature is that the high- est probabilities of impacts (the narrow yellow regions) are for comet orbits that have pericentres close to but slightly smaller than the positions of the planets. For instance, on the planet d inset, we see that the yellow region is concen- trated in a narrow region of the parameter space between 0.015−0.021au (planets c and d positions). This can be read- ily explained because comets with such a pericentre cannot collide with planets b, c so increasing the rate of collisions with planets d, e, f, g, h. The most extreme case is for comets that have pericentres just below planet h, thus ensuring that they can only collide with planet h and explaining the very narrow yellow region in the planet h inset. c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 3.3 Accretion/ejection timescales It is important to consider the timescale on which particles are accreted (or ejected) in the simulations, because we will later be considering how these outcomes compete with other processes that may be acting to modify the particles' orbits (such as the processes that brought them onto comet-like orbits in the first place). In Fig. 4, we plot the loss timescale tloss which is the timescale for half of the 2000 test particles to be lost from the simulation (through accretion or ejection) as a function of the apocentre Q. Since there is little dependence on the pericentre of the comets' orbits (because the comet velocity is almost independent of q), this shows that for Q (cid:28) 1au, the loss timescale scales as Q3/2 and as Q1/2 for larger Q. For Q (cid:28) 1au, the loss of particles is dominated by accre- tion onto the planets. For a 2D geometry, the rate of colli- sions between a given comet and planet is proportional to Rcol = nσσ2Dvrel, where nσ is the fraction of the comet's orbit per unit cross-section spent in a region dr around the planet's orbit, vrel is the relative velocity at encounter and σ2D is the collisional cross section. Considering the fraction of the orbit spent in an annulus dr around the planet's orbit we find that nσ (per cross-sectional area) is ∝ Q−3/2a −1/2 . pla In practice, the velocity at encounter vrel is the same as 10−310−210−110−1100101102ApocentreQ(au)b10−310−210−110−1100101102c10−310−210−110−1100101102d10−310−210−1Pericentreq(au)10−1100101102e10−310−210−110−1100101102f10−310−210−110−1100101102g10−310−210−110−1100101102h10−210−1100ProbabilitytoimpactPlanet6 Q. Kral et al. Figure 3. Map showing the probability to be ejected for an orbit with a given pericentre and apocentre {q,Q}. The vertical green lines show the positions of planets b to h. The white colour is used to show the part of the parameter space that have pericentres too far from the planets to either collide or be ejected. The black colour is for orbits that collide and eject particles but with a very low ejection probability (cid:54) 10−2. Figure 4. Plot showing the removal timescale (in yr) for a comet as a function of the apocentre Q (in au) for an i = 0◦ (crosses) and a realistic comet-like inclination distribution (filled dots, see subsection 3.5). Figure 5. Accretion timescale tacc = R−1 col as a function of the semi-major axes of the planets apla for an i = 0◦ (crosses) and a realistic comet-like inclination distribution (filled dots). We show the analytically predicted tacc (blue line) for an inclined distri- bution of comets from the i = 0◦ case (see subsection 3.5). Here, tacc is plotted for planet b for Q ∼ 1au and it scales as Q3/2. the impact velocity vimp, and we show in Sec. 3.4 that vimp is close to the comet's velocity (see Eq. 2), which is large enough for gravitational focusing to be ignored such that σ2D = 2Rpla. Therefore, we find that Rcol ∝ Q−3/2a −1 pla, so that the accretion timescale is tacc ∝ R col ∝ Q3/2apla, ex- −1 plaining why the loss timescale scales as Q3/2 for small Q. It also shows that the accretion timescale scales as apla as shown in Fig. 5, where we plot tacc for planet i by computing tloss/pi, where pi is the probability to be accreted on planet i (that we have for every {q, Q} cell in Fig. 2). This also explains why the accretion probability (∝ t−1 acc) decreases as −1 a pla from planet b to h as noted in Sec. 3.2. For Q (cid:29) 1au, the loss is dominated by ejections. In that case, the cross section σej used to calculate the rate of ejection is proportional to the impact parameter bej at which encounters are just strong enough to cause ejection. The kick ∆v that the comet receives from a planet after a close encounter scales with 1/b, and for the ejection to happen vcom∆v > GM(cid:63)/Q (see Sec. 3.2). This means that for a flat geometry σej ∝ Q and so tej ∝ (nσσejvrel)−1 ∝ Q1/2, explaining the dependencies. 3.4 Impact velocities for the different planets An important parameter to determine the effects of a cometary impact onto the atmosphere of a planet is the im- pact velocity. In Fig. 6, we show histograms of impact velocities for the different planets. We computed the impact velocities for each simulation (i.e. for specific pericentres and apocentres), c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 10−310−210−1Pericentreq(au)10−1100101102ApocentreQ(au)10−210−1100Probabilitytobeejected10−1100101102Q(au)100101102103104tloss(yr)∝Q3/2∝Q1/2i=0◦comet-likeinclination10−2apla(au)102103104105106107108tacc(yr)∝a2pla∝aplai=0◦comet-likeinclinationPredictionEffects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 7 but find that the distributions of impact velocity do not de- pend significantly on the comet's pericentre. To get Fig. 6, we therefore average the vimp distributions over the pericen- tres in the grid, assuming that comet orbits are uniform in log q (keeping a fixed apocentre). Averaging in this way re- sults in more accurate histograms of impact velocities. To do so, the impact velocities from the different simulations are weighted by the probability to impact the different planets (using Fig. 2). Furthermore, Fig. 7 shows that the medians of the impact velocity distributions for each planet also do not depend significantly on apocentre. Thus while Fig. 6 shows the distributions for an apocentre of ∼1au, these dis- tributions are also representative of that of a large range of apocentres. We see that the impact velocity distribution is peaked at a different location for each planet from ∼ 15 to ∼110km/s from planet h to b. A much smaller secondary peak can also be seen for each planet. This is because there are two extreme types of impacts. Collisions can occur when the comet is on a near radial orbit approaching or receding from pericentre. They may also occur when the planet and comet velocities are parallel (i.e when the comet encoun- ters the planet near its pericentre). As shown by Eq. 2, the comet velocity at impact is ∼(cid:112)2GM(cid:63)/apla (for apla (cid:28) a), locity of (cid:112)GM(cid:63)/apla (which varies from ∼35km/s for the (cid:112)GM(cid:63)/apla( maximal for radial encounters at (cid:112)3GM(cid:63)/apla. We note which is thus always higher than the planet's Keplerian ve- farthest to ∼80km/s for the closest planet). Therefore, we find that the impact velocity distributions should peak at 2 − 1) (33, 29, 24, 21, 18, 16, 14km/s, for planet b to h) for parallel orbits at impact and would be √ that the impact velocities are much greater than the escape velocities of the planets (∼10km/s) and therefore gravita- tional focusing is not important. Thus the high velocity peaks correspond to comets col- liding on radial orbits and the low velocity peaks to comets falling on the planets at their pericentres (i.e., parallel col- lision). By looking at Fig. 2, we see that for planet h, the highest impact probability region (the yellow region) is very narrow and restricted to comets whose pericentres are close to planet h's position so that most collisions are going to be parallel. This explains why the low velocity peak is higher for this planet. For planet b, however, the yellow region is large and not peaked close to planet b's semi-major axis. Therefore, most impacts will happen with comets on nearly radial orbits and the high velocity peak is therefore higher than the low velocity peak. Histograms for the other planets can be understood following the same procedure. The non-dependence of impact velocities on apocentres shown in Fig. 7 also derives from the velocity at impact, which, as shown by Eq. 2, only depends on apla and not a. We notice that the median velocities are close to the Keple- rian velocities of the corresponding planets (Fig. 7). 3.5 Simulations for realistic inclinations The simulations assumed comets with zero inclination. To check how our results change for different inclinations, we ran a set of 30 additional simulations (spread across the {q, Q} parameter space) with more realistic comet-like in- clinations. The chosen inclination distribution follows a Rayleigh distribution peaking at 10 degrees, i.e close to the c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 Figure 6. Histogram of impact velocities (cut in 100 bins) for each planet weighted by the impact probability from Fig. 2. The y-axis shows the percentage of impacts per velocity bin. distribution of JFC2 comets (Levison & Duncan 1997; Di Sisto et al. 2009). We find that the loss timescale (see Fig. 4, filled dots) and the timescale for accretion onto the differ- ent planets are affected (see Fig. 5, filled dots), but that the impact velocities are unaffected. The difference in tacc between the inclined and flat cases in Fig. 5 can be explained by generalising the analytics in subsection 3.3. The ratio of the rates at which comets col- lide with a planet is expected to be (nvσ3D)/(nσσ2D) = πRpla/(4Imaxapla), where nv is now number per unit vol- ume in the vicinity of the planet and Imax the median incli- nation of the comets in the 3D case. We plot this analytical prediction (blue line) together with some numerical simula- tions for a distribution of inclinations (filled dots) in Fig. 5. A similar comparison shows that the dependence in Q re- mains the same for tacc for the two types of simulations. We thus conclude that the zero inclination simulation collisional rates can be scaled to account for the inclined case. To recover the probability map shown in Fig. 2 for the case of an inclined distribution, we also need to rescale the loss timescale tloss shown in Fig. 4 because the probability pi to be accreted on a given planet i is equal to tloss/tacc. The results for tloss from the inclined numerical simulations are shown in Fig. 4 (filled dots). We can predict the change in ejection timescale (which dominates tloss at Q (cid:29) 0.2au) for the 3D case from the 2D simulations in the same way as for the timescales for accretion onto the planets. This prediction is that ejection timescale should be longer by 0.8(M(cid:63)/Mpla)(aplaImax)/Q. This is reasonably accurate but 2 The Jupiter-family comets are short period comets that orbit part of the time in inner regions of our Solar System and whose orbits are primarily influenced by Jupiter's gravity. 020406080100120140Impactvelocity(km/s)0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0PercentageofimpactspervelocitybinHistogramofimpactvelocitiesPlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlaneth8 Q. Kral et al. Figure 7. Median velocity of the distributions shown in Fig. 6 for different apocentres Q. The thin horizontal lines show the Keplerian velocity of each planet for comparison. we prefer to use the numerical ratio of tloss for the inclined and zero-inclination cases which is best fit by a power law equal to 63 (Imax/10◦) Q−0.61. Using these different scalings, we calculate the new probability map (see Fig. 8) and use that the sum of the probabilities to be accreted onto each of the planets and to be ejected equals 1 to compute a new ejection map (see Fig. 9). Comparing the predictions from our scalings to the different results from the inclined distribution simulations, we find that we are accurate within a factor 2. 4 DIFFERENT SCENARIOS TO MAKE ECCENTRIC COMETS We have studied the dynamics of highly eccentric comets in the presence of the seven TRAPPIST-1 planets in the previ- ous section. Here, we consider three different scenarios that can send comets from the outer regions of the TRAPPIST-1 system onto such eccentric orbits (see Fig. 10); 1) A plan- etesimal disc is perturbed by a nearby planet and comets are scattered inwards by this single planet or through a chain of planets (similar to comets scattered in our Solar System, e.g. Duncan & Levison 1997; Bonsor et al. 2012; Marino et al. 2018). 2) A distant companion to TRAPPIST-1 forces comets in a Kuiper belt-like disc to undergo Kozai-Lidov oscillations (e.g. Nesvold et al. 2016), which can bring the comets to very close pericentres. 3) Galatic tides perturb a far away exo-Oort-cloud and send comets to decreasing pericentres. We assume that the evolution of comets' orbits in these three scenarios can be approximated as an evolution in which their apocentres Q remain constant and their peri- centres q decrease at a constant rate q. This approximation allows us to use the results of Sec. 3 to consider the outcome for comets scattered into the inner regions without having to consider the detailed dynamics of the comets' origin. The simplified dynamics allows us to study a wide range of dif- ferent possible scenarios. Owing to this simplification, the results are expected to give order of magnitude correct esti- mates, which is justified by the uncertainties on the presence of a belt in this system and its yet unknown properties. We explore expectations for the different q values for each of these three scenarios below. 4.1 Impacts from comets scattered by a single or a series of planets In our Solar System, comets from the Kuiper belt are thrown into the inner Solar System thanks to a series of scattering by different planets. This planet scattering scenario has been invoked multiple times (Nesvorn´y et al. 2010; Booth et al. 2009; Bonsor et al. 2014) to try to explain the presence of hot dust around many stars (see Kral et al. 2017a, for a review). More recently, Marino et al. (2018) studied the ef- fect of scattering by a chain of planets for a large parameter space so as to understand which planetary systems are more suited to create large hot dust levels or maximise impacts on the chain of planets. They ran simulations for 1Gyr for dif- ferent chains of planets with semi-major axes ranging from 1 to 50au and planet masses ranging from a few to 100M⊕. In our case, we consider that interactions with the innermost planet of the chain dominate the comets' dynamical evolu- tion as they reach to the very small pericentres considered here. However, we also have to consider that some fraction of comets would have been ejected or accreted by the other planets before reaching the innermost planet of the chain. Marino et al. (2018) show that for a wide range of planet chain architectures, fin = 1 − 7% of comets originating in an outer belt end up reaching the inner system. For a close- in belt similar to the debated (see MacGregor et al. 2018) belt recently invoked around the M-dwarf Proxima Centauri (Anglada et al. 2017), a single planet at 1au could be enough to scatter comets into the inner regions (but we note that we showed in Sec. 2 that such a close-in belt is not likely to have survived around TRAPPIST-1 unless it formed re- cently). In that case, no comets are lost on the way through the chain and fin = 1. We only consider the case of a planet coplanar to the 7 planets as this system seems well-aligned. A non-coplanar configuration would lead to an increased in- clination distribution, which effect could be quantified using the analytics from Sec. 3.5. Conservation of the Tisserand parameter3 (Murray & Dermott 1999) means that comets being scattered by an innermost planet that is on a circular orbit can only reach down to a minimum pericentre (see Bonsor et al. 2012). Thus to scatter comets to small enough pericentres to reach the TRAPPIST-1 planets' locations, we consider that the innermost planet must be on an eccentric orbit, since in that case there is no minimum pericentre constraint (see also Frewen & Hansen 2014). We also consider that this planet 3 This parameter is a constant in the circular three-body prob- lem, which constrains the orbit of a comet after being scattered by a planet. c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 10−1100101102ApocentreQ(au)050100150200Impactvelocity(km/s)PlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlanethEffects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 9 Figure 8. New probability map: similar to Fig. 2 but for an inclined distribution of comets (see Sec. 3.5 for more details). Figure 9. New ejection map: similar to Fig. 3 but for an inclined distribution of comets (see Sec. 3.5 for more details). should not be too massive, so as not to eject the comets before they can reach the innermost parts of the system. Guided by the results of Frewen & Hansen (2014) we consider 1 and 10M⊕ planets with a 0.4 eccentricity orbiting at 1au to be representative of the kind of planets that are able to put comets on orbits that are capable of colliding with the seven known TRAPPIST-1 planets. We note that such planets are not massive enough and not close enough to gravitationally disturb the orbits of the seven currently known planets as can be checked directly from Read & Wy- att (2016), so that the system of the seven inner planets stays stable even in the presence of such an additional planet (see also Quarles et al. 2017). We also note that these planet masses agree with current mass upper limits by Boss et al. c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 Figure 10. Schematic of the different scenarios tested that could potentially scatter comets in the inner regions of the TRAPPIST- 1 system. (2017) (i.e < 4.6MJup within a 1 yr period, and < 1.6MJup within a 5 yr period). While an eccentricity of 0.4 is above the median eccentricity found for Earth to Super-Earth mass planets, such eccentric planets are observed. We also note that our scenario would still work for lower eccentricities as described in Frewen & Hansen (2014) but the q value would vary. Moreover, we find that the outermost planet interact- 10−310−210−110−1100101102ApocentreQ(au)b10−310−210−110−1100101102c10−310−210−110−1100101102d10−310−210−1Pericentreq(au)10−1100101102e10−310−210−110−1100101102f10−310−210−110−1100101102g10−310−210−110−1100101102h10−310−210−1100ProbabilitytoimpactPlanet10−310−210−1Pericentreq(au)10−1100101102ApocentreQ(au)10−210−1100Probabilitytobeejected0.06au0.01au1au100auSingle planetPlanetscatteringTRAPPIST-1 planetsPlanet chainKozaimechanismOuter companion10000auGalactic tides10 Q. Kral et al. ing with the belt and causing the scattering could migrate outwards if it has a mass (cid:46) 10M⊕ (see Eq. 58 in Ormel et al. 2012, where we used the surface density of the potential surviving belt shown in Fig. 1) and stall if it is more mas- sive. Such a migration is beneficial to sending more comets inwards as shown in Bonsor et al. (2014) because more time is available for the scattering process and it can access more material to scatter from. However, for a planet mass (cid:46)0.1M⊕, the scattering would not be efficient anymore as shown by Eq. 52 of Ormel et al. (2012). Too massive an outer planet would also prevent material from being scattered in- wards as it would be more likely ejected but disc evolution models find that having another Jupiter in the TRAPPIST- 1 system is unlikely (Haworth et al. 2018). Marino et al. (2018) show that for planet masses (cid:46)100M⊕, (cid:38) 2% of the scattered comets still reach the inner region. More massive planets such as a Jupiter would more likely eject most of the material (see Wyatt et al. 2017). We ran N-body simulations to follow the evolution of test particles initially randomly located in the chaotic zone (where resonances overlap, as classically defined in Wisdom 1980) of such an eccentric planet. The planet is located at 1au and simulations are run until the planet runs out of material to scatter among the initial 5000 particles in the chaotic zone. Fig. 11 shows the evolution of the distribu- tion of pericentres of particles that have their apocentres at the 10M⊕ planet location, which decreases steadily with time. Quantifying the rate of this decrease by looking at the evolution of the median of the distribution, we find that qP ∼ 5 × 10 −5au/yr, (4) over many orbits for the 10M⊕ case. Running another simu- lation for an Earth mass planet with similar eccentricity at the same location, we find that qP ∼ 10−5au/yr. While the path of an individual comet could be some- what stochastic through the parameter space (jumping in individual scattering events), the effect for an ensemble of comets is that of a slow inward migration of q. Therefore, we model this population, and how it is depleted due to in- teractions with the seven inner planets, by assuming that comets have an apocentre Q that is fixed at the position of the innermost planet of the chain (1au), and considering the various depletion pathways as the comets cross the param- eter space in Figs. 2 and 3 at a constant rate q. That rate depends on the mass of the planet, so we keep this as a free parameter, noting that Eq. 4 gives realistic values. That rate has a strong influence on the outcome (see Sec. 5). 4.2 Impacts from comets undergoing Kozai-Lidov oscillations due to an outer companion The incidence of binaries around M-dwarfs is around 27% (Janson et al. 2012). Comets located at tens of hundreds of au (either in a disc or a more spherical Oort-cloud like distribution) could be perturbed by such distant compan- ion stars. If the mutual inclination i0 of some comets with this companion is greater than 39.23 degrees, the so-called Kozai-Lidov cycle can start and the mutual inclination starts decreasing while the eccentricity of the comet increases to reach a maximum (Kozai 1962; Lidov 1962). Figure 11. Distribution of pericentres at 3 epochs (80, 1180 and 4980yr) due to perturbations of an eccentric (e=0.4), 10M⊕ planet located at 1au. Particles are initially placed in the planet's chaotic zone and the ones with apocentres at the planet get pe- riodic kicks that push their pericentres q inwards. The median of distributions are shown as vertical lines. The median of q goes inward with time and we find q = 5 × 10−5au/yr for this case. (cid:112)1 − (5/3) cos2(i0) (Innanen et al. 1997). This means that For the case of a circular outer companion, the max- imum eccentricity reached by the comets is given by to reach a pericentre q < q1 = 10−2au (to be able to reach the seven planets), the initial mutual inclination should be (cid:16)(cid:113) 3 (cid:17) 5 (1 − (1 − q1/a)2) greater than i0 > arccos , where a is the semi-major axes of the comets. If the belt is really close- in, i.e a = 0.1au, this corresponds to i0 > 70.3 degrees, and at 100au, it gives i0 > 89.4 degrees (i.e., an almost perpen- dicular orbit is necessary in this latter case). We note that this inclination is between the perturber and comets and the latter can be inclined compared to the planets. Therefore, finely tuned companions would be needed to send comets to the right location. However, for an eccentric outer companion, the comets' eccentricity can reach values arbitrarily close to 1 (e.g. Lith- wick & Naoz 2011; Teyssandier et al. 2013). While the peri- astron precession (due to GR) can dominate the dynamics (Liu et al. 2015) and stop the Kozai mechanism from work- ing when the eccentricity comes close to 1, this occurs only for pericentres interior to the known TRAPPIST-1 planets (see Eq. 50 and Fig. 6 of Liu et al. 2015). The Kozai oscillations will occur even if the perturbing companion is very distant and/or not very massive, only the timescale to achieve the eccentricity change will be longer in that case. Assuming the initial eccentricities e0 of comets in a disc are small then the timescale TK to reach the maximum eccentricity given an eccentric perturber is (Antognini 2015; Naoz 2016) c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 10−310−210−1100Pericentre(au)01020304050607080Distributionofpericentres(%)Evolutionofpericentresfora10M⊕eccentricplanetat1auTime=80yrTime=1180yrTime=4980yrEffects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 11 (cid:18) 1 + M(cid:63) Mc (cid:19)(cid:18) P 2 c P (cid:19)(cid:0)1 − e2 c (cid:1)3/2 , TK ∼ 2.7√ oct (5) where ac, ec, Mc and Pc are, respectively, the semi-major axis, eccentricity, mass and orbital period of the companion and P is the orbital period of the comet being perturbed (i.e P = 2π(cid:112)a3/(GM(cid:63))). The parameter oct = ec(a/ac)/(1 − e2 c) quantifies the relative size of the octupole term of the Hamiltonian compared to the quadrupole term and is not equal to zero for an eccentric perturber (the timescale for a circular orbit can be found by substituting oct ∼ 259, see Antognini 2015). Then, we can determine an order of magnitude for the rate of pericentre evolution given by qK ∼ (a(1 − e0) − q1)/TK ∼ a(1 − e0)/TK , so that qK ∼ 2 × 10 (cid:16) ec 0.4 −4(cid:16) a (cid:17)1/2(cid:18) 1 − e2 100au 1 − 0.42 1 − 0.1 (cid:17)3(cid:18) 1 − e0 (cid:19)(cid:16) ac (cid:19)−2(cid:18) 1 + M(cid:63)/Mc (cid:18) M(cid:63) (cid:19)1/2 1 + 0.08/0.01 150au c (cid:17)−7/2 (cid:19)−1 0.08M(cid:12) au/yr. (6) Therefore, considering a belt at 100au perturbed by an ec- centric companion of mass 0.01M(cid:12) at 150au4, we find that qK ∼ 2× 10−4au/yr. While a much farther companion could decrease that value and a farther exo-Kuiper belt would in- crease qK , we consider in Sec. 5.1 how evolution at typical q might affect the planetary atmospheres of TRAPPIST-1 planets. We have also checked that for such a configuration the Kozai mechanism cannot be suppressed by the precession induced by unknown planets in the system. Imagining the worst case scenario of the presence of a Jupiter-mass planet at 10au in this system, the Kozai dynamics remains dom- inated by the outer companion if the belt is located fur- ther than ∼30au (Petrovich & Munoz 2017), which is as- sumed here. We also looked at the effect of the seven known TRAPPIST-1 planets on the Kozai mechanism. The bodies that can reach these planets must be very eccentric and to take that into account properly, we model the effect of these planets as being an effective J2 (quadrupole moment) and check whether the precession rate due to J2, i.e. ωJ2 is able to counteract the precession due to Kozai. Using Eq. 35 in Fabrycky & Tremaine (2007), we find that the effective J2 of the 7 TRAPPIST-1 planets starts contributing and reduce the maximum Kozai eccentricity for J2 > 105(cid:16) a (cid:18) Mc 100au 0.01M(cid:12) (cid:17)−3(cid:18) 1 − e2 (cid:19)−1(cid:16) a7 1 − 0.42 (cid:17)5(cid:16) ac (cid:19)(cid:18) M(cid:63) (cid:18) (cid:112) 150au ( 0.08M(cid:12) 1 − e2 + c (cid:19)−3/2 (cid:17)−2 (cid:19)(cid:0)1 − e2(cid:1)2 0.06au 1 2 )2 − 1 4 , (7) where a7 is the semi-major axis of the outermost 4 We note that such a low mass companion at large distances is not yet ruled out (Howell et al. 2016; Boss et al. 2017). c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 TRAPPIST-1 planet, and e is the eccentricity of the comet, which for a belt of semi-major axis a should be 1− 0.01/a to be able to reach the innermost planet or 1− 0.06/a to reach the outermost one. Using Batygin & Morbidelli (2017), we find that the J2 due to the 7 TRAPPIST-1 planets would be ∼ 2 × 10−5. Therefore, from Eq. 7, we estimate that for a 0.01M(cid:12) at 150au, the belt of planetesimals should be at (cid:38) 10au to be able to reach the outermost planet or at (cid:38) 70au to reach the innermost one. We acknowledge that the change in inclination while undergoing Kozai oscillations is not taken into account in our previous general simulations shown in Sec. 3. However, depending on the exact inclination of the companion com- pared to the belt, we can quantify using the equations given in Sec. 3.5 how it will affect the probability to be accreted onto the planets, which scales as I−1 max. 4.3 Impacts from Oort-cloud comets perturbed by Galactic tides TRAPPIST-1 may have an Oort cloud, either because comets were captured from their neighbouring stars' belts at the cluster stage (Levison et al. 2010), or because comets were scattered out by its planetary system (Tremaine 1993). In our Solar System, Duncan et al. (1987) propose that left- over comets between Uranus and Neptune would be thrown onto more extended orbits by the two planets until they reach a semi-major axis of ∼ 5000au where Galactic tides change their angular momentum, therefore moving their pe- riastron from reach of the planets. While planets that are ef- ficient at forming Oort clouds need to have the right ranges of mass and semi-major axis, which does not include the known TRAPPIST-1 planets (e.g. Wyatt et al. 2017), other (as yet unseen) planets in the system could have scattered material into such an Oort cloud. Moreover, an Oort-cloud forming planet does not necessarily need to be at this exact location now as it could have migrated. The same mechanism, i.e. Galactic tides, which in- creased angular momentum of leftover comets pumped up by Uranus and Neptune and thus detaching the comet or- bits from the planets can also decrease angular momentum and bring back an outer Oort-cloud comet to the planetary system. For an Oort cloud, the Galactic tidal force (due to the Galactic disc potential) will slowly make the comets lose angular momentum resulting in a slow drift inwards of peri- centre (because e increases, a is constant) at a rate qG (e.g. Heisler & Tremaine 1986; Matese & Whitman 1992; Veras & Evans 2013). The eccentricity reaches a maximum that is given by Breiter & Ratajczak (2005), which is greater for comets perpendicular to the orbital plane. It is usually as- sumed that when a comet reaches a few au, it is lost from the Oort cloud due to planetary perturbations (e.g. Heisler & Tremaine 1986; Fouchard et al. 2006). The value of qG can be estimated from the mean square change in angular momentum per orbit (cid:104)∆J 2(cid:105) = 1.2 × 10−29ρ2 0 a7/M(cid:63) (in au4/yr2, Eq. A4 of Wyatt et al. 2017), with ρ0 the stellar mass density in units of 0.1M(cid:12)/pc3 (lo- cal stellar mass density), a in au and M(cid:63) in M(cid:12). Thus, since qG = (cid:112)(cid:104)∆J 2(cid:105) q/(2a3)/π, we estimate that (Duncan et al. 1987) 12 Q. Kral et al. qG ∼ 7 × 10 −8 ρ0 (cid:18) (cid:16) (cid:19)(cid:16) a (cid:17)1/2(cid:18) M(cid:63) (cid:17)2 (cid:19)−1/2 0.1M(cid:12)/pc3 104au q 0.06au 0.08M(cid:12) au/yr. (8) We note that this qG value is very small but it varies strongly with a. Therefore, for the case of the TRAPPIST-1 planets, it means that if the location of the Oort cloud is closer than a few 103au, the time for moving the bulk of Oort-cloud bod- ies down to small pericentres close to the planet positions (i.e., < 0.06au) would be greater than the age of the system. However, for an Oort-cloud at 105au, it only takes ∼5Myr to reach the inner region but an origin at such a large distance becomes unlikely given that such comets would have been stripped by passing stars (Tremaine 1993). Given the age and low-mass of TRAPPIST-1, comets with a semi-major axis beyond 2000au should be strongly depleted by passing stars but some may still remain. We also note that the pres- ence of massive Jupiter-like planets in the outer regions of the TRAPPIST-1 system would have strong effects on the dynamics of the system (e.g. Kaib & Quinn 2009) and our prescription would need to be revised if this type of planet is discovered. 5 RESULTS 5.1 Fraction of comets that impact onto each planet 5.1.1 For a general q Here we use the results from sections 3.1 and 3.5 to deter- mine how much material will be accreted on the different planets depending on how fast comets move inwards, which is assumed to be set by a constant rate of change of pericen- tre q. For a given q and apocentre Q, each (pericentre) q cell of our parameter space is progressively crossed as the comet moves inwards to smaller q values. Taking into account the timescales shown in Fig. 4 and scalings from Sec. 3.5 (as we consider realistic inclined comets), we can use Figs. 2 and 3 (or their counterparts Figs. 8 and 9) to work out the fraction of comets that are accreted onto the different plan- ets or ejected along the way. Hereafter we only consider the inclined case using the results from Sec. 3.5. Fig. 12 shows the fraction accreted on the different plan- ets facc for Q = 1 and 100au. For small q (i.e < 10−5au/yr for the Q = 1au case) most comets end up on planets g (yellow curve) and h (brown), while for large q each planet gets a fraction of comets accreted. We also show the frac- tion ejected as grey lines for Q = 1 and 100au, which is close to 1 for very small q and decreases for larger values, meaning that comets can go past the planets without be- ing ejected nor accreted onto the planets for q > 10−5au/yr. These comets may end up on the star or collisionally deplete before reaching it. We see that the fraction of comets accreted5 facc onto the different planets varies significantly from 0.05 to < 10−8 for 10−6 < q < 1au/yr. For small q, the fraction accreted is dominated by planets h and g because q decreases so slowly that these outermost planets catch all impacting comets be- fore they reach further in. On the other hand, for large q, the comets cannot efficiently accrete on the planets (as the loss timescale is long compared to q/ q, see Fig. 4) and end up at small radii (where they either accrete onto the star or deplete collisionally). In between these two regimes, each planet accretes a fraction of the scattered comets. The frac- tion of comets accreted facc is also higher for smaller apoc- entres, as expected from Fig. 2. We find that for large q, facc ∝ q−1Q−1. The fraction accreted by the different plan- ets vary by one order of magnitude in this regime (with b and h representing the extremes). This is due to both the difference in collisional cross sections and positions (since tacc ∝ a2 pla, see Fig. 5). In subsection 5.1.2, we assess the outcome for the specific values of q that have been derived in Sec. 4 for the different scenarios. 5.1.2 For q derived from specific scenarios In Fig. 12, we see that for a planet scattering scenario (both for a single planet or a chain) in which Q = 1au and q = 10−5au/yr (i.e. corresponding to a 1M⊕ planet in Sec. 4.1), we end up in the regime where a fraction of comets is accreted onto each planet. The fraction accreted is rather high in this case (between 0.01 and 0.03 for planets b to g) because the probability to be accreted for comets with Q = 1au is rather high (as expected from Fig. 3). This frac- tion accreted is valid for a single eccentric planet scattering material from a close-in belt at ∼ 1au similar to the debated belt potentially found around Proxima Cen (Anglada et al. 2017). However, comets coming from tens of au belts would have to be scattered through a planet chain before making it to the innermost planet of the chain and some will be lost on the way. Here we assume that fin ∼ 5% of the comets will make it to the innermost planet (see Sec. 4.1), which reduces the fraction accreted on the different planets from the initial reservoir (the Kuiper-belt like disc) to ∼ 5×10−4. For the Kozai scenario, we consider that Q represents the disc location from which the comets are perturbed by an outer companion and we take a typical distance of 100au as being representative. Considering the typical qK value de- rived (2 × 10−4 au/yr), Fig. 12 shows that we are in the second regime where a fraction of comets (∼ 10−5) is ac- creted onto each of the seven planets. This is close to two orders of magnitude smaller than the chain of planets case. Here, we do not have to reduce the number of comets that arrives on to the seven planets (i.e fin = 1) as Kozai oscil- lations operate directly from the outer belt. For the Galactic tide scenario, from Fig. 12, we eval- uate that an Oort cloud at a few 104au (that has a fast enough qG to send comets to small pericentres within a fraction of the age of the system), i.e with large apocen- tres, the probability to be accreted is always (cid:46) 10−6 (for all the plotted q, i.e more than order of magnitude smaller than for the Kozai mechanism). Therefore, the fraction of 5 Here, we use accreted to say that a comet was not ejected but instead impacted onto a planet. It does not mean that the entirety of the accreted comet's material will stay in the atmosphere as we will show later. c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 Effects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 13 Figure 12. Fraction of comets accreted facc onto each planet as a function of q for Q = 1au (solid lines) and Q = 100au (dashed). For large q, facc scales approximately as ∝ Q−1 so this plot can be used for all Q values. The Y-axis shows the fraction of comets that hits the different planets (i.e., accretion regime). The grey lines show the ejected fraction of comets. The vertical black lines are typical q values for two scenarios: planet scattering (with Q = 1au) and Kozai oscillations from a 100au belt (see the text in Sec. 5.1). comets accreted is very low, which will not have any im- pacts on the atmospheres. Therefore, we rule out Galactic tides as being an efficient mechanism6 to modify the atmo- spheres of the TRAPPIST-1 planets. We also note that the same forces driving particles with high pericentres to low pericentres could also drive back these low pericentre orbits to high values, sometimes before they had time to reach the 7 inner planets (e.g. Emel'Yanenko et al. 2007; Rickman et al. 2008), and thus makes this scenario even more unlikely. We are, thus, left with two plausible mechanisms to throw comets on the seven planets, namely, scattering by planets and Kozai oscillations due to an outer companion. 6 We note that we could fine tune the position of the Oort cloud to be in a narrow range in between 104 and 105au to maximise the fraction accreted while allowing enough time for the comets to reach the planetary system but this would always result in an order of magnitude less efficient mechanism than Kozai. More- over, it is not likely that an Oort cloud around a low mass star such as TRAPPIST-1 forms farther out than in our Solar System (Wyatt et al. 2017) as required here for maximising Galactic tide effects. And as shown in Sec. 4.3, such distant belts should be depleted owing to passing stars. c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 5.2 The relative effect of different impactor sizes on the atmospheres of the different planets In the previous subsection, we analysed the fraction of comets accreted facc by each planet. However, we want to quantify the effect of these impacts on the atmospheres of the seven planets. For example, we have seen in Fig. 7 that impact velocities are much higher for planet d compared to further planets, so even if the fraction accreted is the same as that of the more distant planets in the planet scattering scenario, the effect on atmospheric mass loss may still be more important. Here, we quantify the atmospheric mass loss, and projectile mass accreted in the atmosphere (rela- tive to impactor masses), i.e., the impactor mass that does not escape the atmosphere after impact, for the different planets and for different impactor sizes. We use the numerical study of the effect of impacts on atmospheres by Shuvalov (2009) to derive some conclusions for the TRAPPIST-1 planets. We first present the set of equations from Shuvalov (2009) that we use to derive the atmospheric mass loss and projectile mass accreted after a given impact. The outcome depends on the dimensionless variable η (Shuvalov 2009) 10−610−510−410−310−210−1100q(au/yr)10−810−710−610−510−410−310−210−1100AccretedfractiononPlanetsfaccQ=100auQ=1auPlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlanethEjection14 Q. Kral et al. Figure 13. Left: Atmospheric mass loss to impactor mass ratio (Matmloss/Mimp)facc for a comet scattered from an outer belt for the different planets as a function of impactor sizes D. It shows how much atmospheric mass is lost after a given comet is thrown in, taking into account that the fraction of comets that hit the different planets is not equal to 1 as already seen in Fig. 12. Right: Accreted projectile mass to impactor mass ratio (Mimpacc/Mimp)facc as a function of D. It shows how much projectile mass is accreted after a given comet is thrown in. The different lines are for Q = 1 (solid lines) and 100au (dashed lines) with q = 10−5au/yr and for Q = 1au and q = 10−1au/yr (dotted line). (cid:18) D (cid:19)3 ρprρt imp − V 2 esc) (V 2 H ρatm0(ρpr + ρt) V 2 esc η = , (9) where D is the impactor diameter, H the atmosphere scale height (H = kT /(µmH g) for an isothermal atmosphere with g = GMp/R2 p) and ρt, ρpr, ρatm0 are the densities of the target (planet), projectile (exocomet), and atmosphere at the surface, respectively. We assumed ρt = 5000 (terrestrial planet-like), ρpr = 1200 (comet-like), ρatm0 = 1.2kg/m3, µ = 28.97 (we assume an Earth-like atmosphere for now) and T is taken to be the equilibrium temperature of the planets (assuming a null Bond albedo as calculated in Gillon et al. 2016). We note that recent observations suggest that some of the TRAPPIST-1 planet densities may be slighlty lower because of the potential presence of ice layers. Grimm et al. (2018) find that water mass fractions < 5% can largely explain the observed mass-radius relationship of the less dense planets. Therefore, we can expect densities that are 10s of percent lower than assumed here, which would trans- late as a small uncertainty on η, which is however much lower than the uncertainties on the dynamics (see Sec. 4), and is thus not considered here in details. Vimp is the impact velocity and Vesc =(cid:112)2GMpla/Rpla is the escape velocity for the different planets. We have seen in Sec. 3.4 that Vimp is much greater than Vesc, which simplifies the previous and following equations for most cases. The atmospheric mass loss per impactor mass is then defined as (Shuvalov 2009) Matmloss Mimp = imp − V 2 esc) (V 2 V 2 esc χa(η), (10) is χa = where Mimp −6.375 + 5.239 log10 η − 2.121(log10 η)2 + 0.397(log10 η)3 − 0.037(log10 η)4 + 0.0013(log10 η)5. the impactor mass and log10 To get meaningful results, we compare the atmospheric mass loss Matmloss to the impactor mass (of size D) that makes it to the inner regions and that is accreted on to the planet. Therefore, using the previous notations, we are in- terested in (Matmloss/Mimp)finfacc where we recall that fin is the proportion of comets that are scattered from an outer belt and make it to the inner regions and facc is the accreted fraction onto a given planet. This ratio can therefore be un- derstood as the atmospheric mass that is removed by one comet scattered from an outer belt, where only "a fraction" of the comet makes it to the inner regions and a fraction of that is accreted onto a specific planet. In Fig. 13 (left), we plot (Matmloss/Mimp)facc keeping in mind that we should multiply that value by fin (if it is different than 1, see Ta- ble 2) to get the real value of accreted comets that make it to the inner regions. Fig. 13 (left) shows (Matmloss/Mimp)facc as a func- tion of impactor diameter D for Q = 1 and 100au (and q ∼ 10−5au/yr) and for a higher q (10−1au/yr) and Q = 1au, using the impact velocity distributions shown in Fig. 6. The overall shape of the curves in Fig. 13 (left) is explained in Shuvalov (2009). Impactors of size a few kms are the most harmful at removing atmospheric mass. Impactors smaller than 100m do not create large impact plumes and cannot accelerate large atmospheric mass to high latitudes. For im- pactors larger than a few 10s of kms, atmospheric erosion continues to grow very slowly but the mass an impact re- moves cannot be greater than the total local atmospheric mass available. Therefore, for large impactors the atmo- spheric mass removed per increasing impactor mass becomes smaller. The most harmful impactor size shifts along the x-axis for the different planets mainly because of the change in im- pactor velocity and the different properties of the planets through H (the atmosphere scale height) with the relative scalings given in Eq. 9. The variations along the y-axis are mainly due to the different fraction accreted facc for each different planet (see Fig. 12) and the different impact veloc- ities (see Fig. 6) and scale as shown in Eq. 10. For example, we see that even though planets d, e, f, g accrete at the same level (see Fig. 12), the atmospheric mass loss is greater for c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 10−1100101102ImpactordiameterD(km)10−810−710−610−510−410−310−210−1100101102faccMatmloss/Mimp[q=10−5,Q=100][q=10−5,Q=1][q=10−1,Q=1][q=10−5,Q=100][q=10−5,Q=1][q=10−1,Q=1]PlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlaneth10−1100101102ImpactordiameterD(km)10−810−710−610−510−410−310−210−1100101102faccMimpacc/Mimp[q=10−5,Q=100][q=10−5,Q=1][q=10−1,Q=1][q=10−5,Q=100][q=10−5,Q=1][q=10−1,Q=1]PlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlanethEffects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 15 planet d because impact velocities are higher for the closer in planets (see Fig. 6). The effect of increasing Q from 1 to 100au (solid to dashed lines) is to shift all the lines down by a factor 100 because facc decreases by a factor 100. Changing q from 10−5 (solid) to 10−1au/yr produces a shift downwards of four orders of magnitude since facc decreases by a factor 104 between these two cases. Fig. 13 (left) can therefore be used to work out the relative effectiveness of comets at removing mass from the atmosphere of each planet for any given q and Q, even though we show the results for only two different Q (i.e., it is a general plot, not tied to a specific scenario from Sec. 4, and only facc ∝ q−1Q−1 changes for different values of q and Q, making it easy to compute results for different q and Q). The simulations of Shuvalov (2009) also showed that the projectile mass accreted per impactor is given by of ice by mass. For an asteroid-like body, the water mass fraction is lower and is found to vary between 10−3 and 0.1 (Abe et al. 2000). We will assume an intermediate value of 1% for asteroid-like bodies7, which is typical of ordinary chondrites in our Solar System (but we note that carbona- ceous chondrites can reach 10% of water by mass, Raymond et al. 2004). This gives us two extreme volatile delivery sce- narios to consider with our model. The CO or H2O content of exocomets can be probed for the most massive belts and are found to be similar to Solar System comets (e.g. Kral et al. 2016; Marino et al. 2016; Matr`a et al. 2017a). The potential to detect gas in debris disc systems will improve with new missions (see Kral et al. 2017b) and the assumptions used in this study could be refined with future estimates of the volatile content of exo- comets in the TRAPPIST-1 system to get a better handle on the final atmospheric composition. Mimpacc = 1 − χpr(η), Mimp (11) where χpr = min{1, 0.07(ρt/ρpr)(Vimp/Vesc)(log10 η − 1)}. Similarly to atmospheric mass loss, Fig. 13 (right) shows the accreted projectile mass per comet (Mimpacc/Mimp)facc as a function of impactor diameter D for Q = 1 and 100au (and q ∼ 10−5au/yr) and for a higher q (10−1au/yr) and Q = 1au. The shape of the curves in Fig. 13 (right) is already known from Shuvalov (2009). The ejecta from impacting bodies that are (cid:46) 1km does not have enough energy to es- cape after impact and is stranded in the atmosphere (though some material may condense on the planet surface at a later point, see Sec. 6.3). For more massive bodies, the ejecta after impact is increasingly more energetic until the airless limit is reached (i.e., when atmospheric drag can be neglected before the after-impact plume expansion) where all the projectile material escapes. This cut-off happens for bodies larger than a few km. In Fig. 13 (right), the variations along the x-axis (e.g. of the cut-off position) are due to different impact velocities (for instance a larger planetesimal can deliver material onto planet h because impacts happen at lower velocities) and it can also vary with the planets' properties through H and the atmospheric density (assumed constant for now) with the scalings given by Eq. 9. Planets g and h can therefore get volatiles delivered from larger comets than further in planets. The variations along the y-axis are mainly due to the fraction of comets accreted onto the planets and the different impact velocities and scale as depicted by Eq. 11. The effect of increasing Q from 1 to 100au (solid to dashed lines) or increasing q from 10−5 to 10−1au/yr is the same as explained when describing Fig. 13 (left), i.e., due to the change in facc. This plot is therefore also general and can be used to compute the outcome of an impact for any values of q and Q, and is not tied to any of the specific scenarios explained in Sec. 4. The volatile mass that ends up in the atmospheres is a fraction fvol of the mass delivered. We assume that volatiles are delivered to the atmospheres in proportion to their frac- tion of the mass of the parent body. For a comet-like body, we assume a rock-to-ice mass ratio of 4 based on recent mea- surements in the 67P comet (Rotundi et al. 2015), i.e 20% c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 5.3 The integrated effect of these impacts over the age of the system 5.3.1 Total incoming mass over the system's age We now work out the effect of impacts on the TRAPPIST- 1 planets over the age of the system and more specifically, how much atmospheric mass is lost and how much projec- tile/volatile mass is accreted for a given total incoming mass of comets. To do so, we assume a typical N (D) ∝ Dγ size distribution with γ = −3.5 for the comets that are expelled from the belt (e.g. Dohnanyi 1969; Th´ebault & Augereau 2007) up to a maximum size of 10km8. Indeed, integrating over the assumed size distribution for the total atmospheric mass loss (or accreted material) shows that > 10km im- pactors are unimportant (as already concluded by Schlicht- ing et al. 2015) because Matmloss ∝ D−2 for large bodies as seen from Fig. 13 (left), which decreases faster than the gain in mass of these larger bodies (∝ D0.5). Very massive giant impacts (e.g. Kral et al. 2015) of bodies with radius > 1000km (i.e Pluto-sized or greater) can have a devastat- ing effect on the atmosphere of a planet (Schlichting et al. 2015), which is not modelled in Shuvalov (2009), but these impacts are rare and thus neglected in this study. We consider an incoming mass of comets Minc that reaches and can potentially hit the TRAPPIST-1 planets after a mass Msca of comets has been scattered from this outer belt over the system's age. Taking into account the ef- ficiency to reach inner regions, Minc = Mscafin (see Fig. 14). The integrated amount of mass scattered from a belt Msca over the system's age can be evaluated. In Sec. 2, we predicted that a potential planetesimal belt of 20M⊕ could potentially have survived around TRAPPIST-1 at tens of 7 We assume that the bulk of the volatile mass is in water so that this value is representative of the total volatile mass, though a lower limit. 8 We note that the size distribution of the Kuiper belt for the largest bodies is complicated and best-fitted by two shallow power laws and a knee or a divot between the two (Lawler et al. 2018), which would imply that most of the cross section would be in the biggest bodies. This is not representative of what is observed in general for the debris disc population, for which a -3.5 slope all the way through the largest bodies is able to explain the observations. 16 Q. Kral et al. Table 2. Table describing the parameters used for the different scenarios we tested. We list the rate of change of pericentre q, the apocentre Q, the mean fraction accreted facc on each planet, the fraction of comets that makes it to the inner regions fin, the mass fraction of volatiles on the exocomets/exoasteroids fvol, the minimum scattered mass Mscadestroy to destroy all 7 primordial atmospheres (Msca = Minc/fin), the mass of delivered volatiles Mvolmin and water Mwatmin (assuming Solar-System comet-like compositions) for a belt scattering at the low scattering rate of the current Kuiper belt (i.e Minc ∼ 10−2M⊕ fin) for each of the planets f, g, h, and MvolT, MwatT for a belt of 20M⊕ (close to the expected mass for a potential leftover belt around TRAPPIST-1, see section 2) scattering 5% (i.e Minc ∼ 1M⊕ fin) of its mass over 7Gyr. For the case of exoasteroids, fvol = 0.01, and Mvolmin as well as MvolT should be divided by 20, and Mwatmin, MwatT by 10. Meo means 1 Earth ocean (i.e 2.5 × 10−4M⊕). Scenarios Single planet (1M⊕) Single planet (10M⊕) Planet chain (1M⊕) Planet chain (10M⊕) Kozai mechanism q au/yr 10−5 10−5 5 × 10−5 5 × 10−5 2 × 10−4 Q au 1 1 1 1 100 facc fin fvol Mscadestroy Mvolmin,Mwatmin M⊕ M⊕,Meo 7 × 10−2 4 × 10−2 7 × 10−2 4 × 10−2 1.5 × 10−4 1 1 0.05 0.05 1 0.2/0.01 0.2/0.01 0.2/0.01 0.2/0.01 0.2 5 × 10−4 3 × 10−3 5 × 10−2 10−2 1 4 × 10−6,8 × 10−3 8 × 10−7,2 × 10−3 2 × 10−7,4 × 10−4 4 × 10−8,4 × 10−5 2 × 10−9,4 × 10−6 5.3.2 Atmospheric mass loss MvolT,MwatT M⊕,Meo 4 × 10−4,0.8 8 × 10−5,0.2 2 × 10−5,4 × 10−2 4 × 10−6,4 × 10−3 2 × 10−7,4 × 10−4 The total atmospheric mass loss for a given planet over the system's age is (cid:90) Dmax Mtotatmloss = N (D)Matmloss(D)facc dD, (13) Dmin where N (D) is the number of bodies in each impactor di- ameter bin D that make it to the inner regions. Fig. 15 shows Mtotatmloss/Minc, i.e the total atmospheric mass loss compared to the incoming mass Minc of comets injected into the inner regions over the lifetime of the star. Once again, this figure is general (and can be used for any q and Q) and is not tied to a specific scenario (only the black vertical lines are scenario dependent). We show the atmo- spheric mass removed for specific values of apocentres Q = 1 and 100au but values for other Q can also be estimated (as Mtotatmloss ∝ facc ∝ Q−1). Atmospheric mass loss remains lower for planets g and h because impacts happen at lower velocities (see also Fig. 13 left). The mean total atmospheric mass loss for the seven planets can be approximated as (cid:18) (cid:19)−1(cid:18) Q (cid:19)−1 Mtotatmloss Minc ∼ 2 × 10 −3 q 10−5au/yr , (14) 1au where we note that this ratio is accurate for planets d, e and f but can be a factor 10 more or less for a specific planet (e.g. 10 times higher for planet b and 10 times lower for planet h), and Fig. 15 should be used to get more accurate values. To assess whether the impact process is capable of de- stroying an entire primordial atmosphere, we first estimate the primordial atmospheric masses of the different planets. These primordial atmopsheric masses are not known and so for reference we asssume an Earth-like composition and den- sity. Computing the scale height for each planet (as in Eq. 9) and assuming an isothermal atmosphere of temperature T (the equilibrium temperature of the planets), we integrate over the height of the planet atmospheres to get their masses Matm = 4πρatm0H(R2 pla +2HRpla +2H 2). This gives primor- dial atmospheric masses of 2, 0.9, 0.7, 0.9, 1.1, 0.7, 0.4 × 10−6 M⊕ for planets b to h. This is shown on Fig. 15 as horizontal lines, where this mass has been divided by 1M⊕ to show the effect of an incoming mass of 1M⊕. Therefore, a primordial Earth-like density atmosphere (12) on the TRAPPIST-1 planets could be destroyed if c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 Figure 14. Schematic showing the main variables used to parametrise comet scattering (here, for the planet chain case but this is general) in the inner regions of the TRAPPIST-1 system. au. By the action of a nearby planet, many planetesimals may have been scattered inwards over the lifetime of the system. Assuming that 5% of the belt mass is scattered over 7 Gyrs (using results by Marino et al. 2018), we get that Msca ∼ 1M⊕ leading to Minc ∼ fin M⊕. In our Solar System, ∼ 0.27 comet/yr leave the Kuiper belt towards the inner regions (Levison & Duncan 1997). The typical mass of comets in Levison & Duncan (1997)'s study is ∼ 4 × 1013kg so that the rate of scattered incom- Msca ∼ 2 × 10−3M⊕/Gyr. Therefore, a sim- ing comets is ilar Kuiper belt around TRAPPIST-1 would give Msca ∼ 10−2M⊕ over 7Gyr leading to Minc ∼ 10−2fin M⊕. However, the Kuiper belt is thought to have been a lot more massive in its youth (e.g. Levison et al. 2011, and see Sec. 2) and in general, debris discs that are observed can have fractional luminosities of up to 104 greater than this low-mass belt (Wyatt 2008), which is an indicator of them being more massive. We note that the Kuiper belt is so light (∼ 0.1M⊕, Fraser & Kavelaars 2009; Vitense et al. 2010) that current instruments could not even detect it around another star (Vitense et al. 2012; Kral et al. 2017b). From an MMSN-like calculation, the initial Kuiper belt mass may have been of several 10s of Earth masses (Hayashi 1981; Morbidelli et al. 2003), meaning that Msca could have been of the order of a few 10M⊕ owing to the depletion of the belt to reach its current mass. In other words, we expect −2fin M⊕ (cid:46) Minc (cid:46) 30fin M⊕. 10 PlanetscatteringQ=1au (apocentre)q<0.06au (pericentre) (pericentre evolution over time)Msca (comet mass scattered from belt)Minc= finMsca (comet mass that reaches inner region)Effects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 17 Figure 15. Total atmospheric mass loss for a given incoming mass of comets that reach the inner region, i.e Mtotatmloss/Minc (assuming a -3.5 size distribution) as a function of q for Q = 1 (solid lines) and 100au (dashed). The vertical black lines are typical q values for each scenario (see the text in Sec. 5.1). The primordial atmospheric masses of each planet are plotted as horizontal lines for an incoming mass of 1M⊕, assuming an Earth-like atmospheric density and composition. Minc > 5 × 10 −4 (cid:18) (cid:19)(cid:18) Q (cid:19) 1au q 10−5au/yr M⊕. (15) For the specific physical scenarios from Sec. 4 (see vertical black lines on Fig. 15 for the planet scattering and Kozai sce- narios), Table 2 shows the minimum scattered mass needed Mscadestroy from an outer belt (the minimum incoming mass would be finMscadestroy) to destroy the primordial atmo- spheres of the seven planets. For example, for the planet scattering scenario with a single Earth-mass planet at 1au (i.e q ∼ 10−5au/yr, Q = 1au and fin = 1, see Table 2), using Eq. 15 we find that Minc (cid:38) 5 × 10−4M⊕ can destroy the primordial atmo- spheres of the seven planets. This corresponds to a belt that is being depleted for 7Gyr at a rate ten times lower than that at which the current Kuiper belt is being depleted. If the comets had to be passed in through a planetary sys- tem before reaching the planet at 1au, the inefficiency in the inward scattering process results in an additional fac- tor fin = 0.05. This means that even with this factor, the current Kuiper belt scattering rate is enough to destroy the atmospheres of the seven TRAPPIST-1 planets. c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 For the Kozai scenario q values are higher ( q ∼ 2 × 10−4au/yr) and Q is at larger distances (100au), meaning that interactions with planets are much more likely to re- sult in ejections rather than accretions (see Fig. 3). We find that Minc > 1M⊕ is needed to destroy the primordial atmo- spheres, i.e two orders of magnitude larger than in the planet chain case. For a 1M⊕ incoming mass (i.e. 100 times the cur- rent Kuiper-belt like incoming mass rate), Fig. 15 shows that the atmospheric mass loss is ∼ 2× 10−5M⊕ for planet b and a factor 10 less for planets c, d, e, and f, and about another factor 5-10 less for planets g, h (all of which are higher than the primordial Earth-like atmospheric masses assumed here except for planets g and h that are a factor 2 too small). Given that the exo-Kuiper belts detected around F, G, K stars are much more massive than the Kuiper belt, and that the possible belt mass we derive for the TRAPPIST- 1 belt in Sec. 2 is ∼ 20M⊕), the scattering may be even higher than assumed here (i.e., up to a factor of a few 103 the Kuiper-belt incoming mass), and we conclude that if a scattering belt is around TRAPPIST-1, the primordial at- mospheres would not survive impacts over the system's life- time for both a planet scattering and a Kozai scenario. 10−610−510−410−310−210−1100q(au/yr)10−910−810−710−610−510−410−310−210−1Mtotatmloss/MincQ=100auQ=1auMatm/1M⊕PlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlaneth18 Q. Kral et al. 5.3.3 Water mass loss In Table 3, we also quantify the maximum water mass loss for the single and planet chain scenarios. The water mass loss MwatLossT is given for each planet for a belt of 20M⊕, which is close to the expected mass for a potential leftover belt around TRAPPIST-1 (see section 2) scattering 5% (i.e., Minc ∼ 1M⊕ fin) of its mass over 7Gyr. For the planet chain scenario, the planets can lose up to 4, 1.2, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.12, 0.06 Meo (Earth ocean mass), for b, c, d, e, f, g, h, respec- tively, and 20 times more for the single planet case. These values can be compared to the water mass loss from hy- drodynamic escape due to XUV irradiation during the run- away greenhouse phase, for which they found upper limits of (Bourrier et al. 2017), 80, 40, 2.9, 1.5, 0.9, 0.4, 0.1 Meo, for b, c, d, e, f, g, h, respectively. These values are, however, to be taken as strict upper limits because it is uncertain that hydrogen can reach the very top layers at the base of the hydrodynamic wind, which is needed for it to escape (Bol- mont et al. 2017). Also, this hydrodynamic escape works well to eject hydrogen but other atoms are difficult to drag along (Bolmont et al. 2017). For the impact case, not only hydrogen would escape but the whole fluid in the ejected plume. Bearing these caveats in mind, we can now compare the water mass loss from hydrodynamic escape to the im- pact scenario. For the planet chain case, the water mass loss due to impacts seems to be less efficient than hydrodynamic escape for planets b and c and both scenarios are within a factor of a few for the other planets. For the most optimistic case of the single planet case, impacts could produce the same water loss as hydrodynamic escape for planets b and c and be an order of magnitude higher for planets d to h. 5.3.4 Delivery of volatiles We now evaluate the total mass of material and volatiles that can be delivered from the impactors over the system's life- time. We derive the total accreted projectile mass Mtotimpacc by integrating the mass accreted per impactor (Fig. 13 right) over the assumed size distribution. This accreted mass is as- sumed to be deposited in the planets' atmospheres. Fig. 16 shows Mtotimpacc/Minc, the total accreted pro- jectile mass compared to mass of comets injected into the inner regions over the lifetime of the star. The overall shape is similar to Fig. 15, but note that planet h is far better for delivery of mass into its atmosphere than having its at- mosphere depleted because impacts are at lower velocities (which means material from larger planetesimals can be ac- creted, see Fig. 13 right). This means that the mass delivered on planet h (and planets with similar impact velocities) may be greater than that lost after each impact. To quantify this, Fig. 17 shows the ratio of the accreted projectile mass and atmospheric mass lost, which does not significantly depend on q, instead only depending on the size distribution of comets and slightly on Q. Thus, this ratio is plotted as a function of the slope in the size distribution γ for two different values of Q (1 and 100au). For γ = −3.5, this ratio is greater than one for planets g and h and close to 1 for planet f but lower for the other planets. This means that even if all of the accreted mass ends up in the atmosphere, the total atmospheric mass must be decreasing for the inner planets and can only increase for the outer three planets if all mass ends up in the atmospheres. Regardless, all planets will have their atmospheres enriched by the planetesimals' composition and the situation is similar for all Q. Consider now the fraction of this delivered projectile mass that will be in volatiles, i.e Mtotvolacc = Mtotimpaccfvol, which could be delivered to planets from comets. To assess the amount of volatiles that are delivered to the planets we consider two types of material that impact on to these planets (presented in Sec. 5.2); 1) Cometary-like material with 20% of ice by mass (fvol = 0.2), and 2) Asteroid-like material with ∼1% of volatiles by mass (fvol = 0.01). One important question is whether the icy material will have dissappeared through sublimation before impact- ing the planets. Marboeuf et al. (2016) show that a 1km comet survives sublimation for ∼ 560 orbits around a 0.1L(cid:12) star. TRAPPIST-1 is 200 times less luminous and so the comets will survive much longer. Extrapolating Marboeuf et al. (2016)'s formula to TRAPPIST-1 luminosity, we get that a 1km comet passing at small pericentres (0.1au) would need more than 105 orbits to sublimate. As it only takes a few 100s of orbits for the comets to be accreted on the plan- ets (see Fig. 4), we assume that most of the icy content of the comets will not have sublimated and so will be available to be delivered at impact. We note that during the q evolu- tion, the sublimation will start happening only in the very last phase, i.e when the pericentre is close to the planets already (because for larger pericentres the mass loss from comet sublimation is very slow and the timescale of evolu- tion of the pericentre is much faster, Marboeuf et al. 2016). Thus, the impact timescale of 100s of orbits is a good in- dicator of the number of orbits before impact during which sublimation could happen. Therefore, we estimate the mean of the total volatile mass delivered on each of the seven planets as (cid:18) (cid:19)−1(cid:18) Q (cid:19)−1 , 1au Mtotvolacc Minc ∼ 2 × 10 −3fvol q 10−5au/yr (16) which is, for all planets, within a factor 3 of that from Fig. 16. For all planets, we can also estimate the incoming mass needed to deliver more volatiles than the primordial atmospheric mass (cid:18) (cid:19)(cid:18) Q (cid:19) 1au Minc > 5 × 10 −4f −1 vol q 10−5au/yr M⊕, (17) where we assumed primordial atmospheres of Earth-like den- sities. Thus, for the planet scattering scenario, we find that only a small incoming mass is needed to deliver enough volatiles to potentially replenish an atmosphere with an Earth-like density (e.g., Minc > 3 × 10−3M⊕ for comet-like bodies scattered from an outer belt to a 1M⊕ planet at 1 au). The incoming mass needed for the Kozai scenario is larger, 5M⊕, but not implausible to reach as shown by Eq. 12. From Fig. 17, we have shown that only planets g and h (and possibly f) would be able to retain the largest part of the delivered volatiles. This means that for the planet- scattering and Kozai scenarios, the new atmospheric compo- sitions of planets f, g and h could be entirely set by the comet volatile content, which would replenish the atmospheres over the system's age. However, the absolute level of the volatile c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 Table 3. Amount of water lost due to impacts for the planet scenario (single and chain). The water mass loss MwatLossT is given for each planet for a belt of 20M⊕ (close to the expected mass for a potential leftover belt around TRAPPIST-1, see section 2) scattering 5% (i.e Minc ∼ 1M⊕ fin) of its mass over 7Gyr. Meo means 1 Earth ocean (i.e 2.5 × 10−4M⊕). Effects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 19 Scenarios q (au/yr) Q (au) MwatLossT (Meo) Single planet (10M⊕) Planet chain (10M⊕) 5 × 10−5 5 × 10−5 1 1 b 80 4 c 24 1.2 d 16 0.8 e 12 0.6 f 8 0.4 g h 2.4 0.12 0.12 0.06 Figure 16. Total accreted projectile mass for a given incoming mass of comets sent to inner regions, i.e Mtotimpacc/Minc (assuming a -3.5 size distribution) as a function of q for Q = 1 (solid lines) and 100au (dashed). The vertical black lines are typical q values for each scenario (see the text in Sec. 5.1). The primordial atmospheric masses of each planet are plotted as horizontal lines for an incoming mass of 1M⊕, assuming an Earth-like density and composition. content that will remain in the atmosphere is difficult to con- strain as some fraction of the volatile mass will be ejected by later impacts or end up on the planet's surface and some other sources of volatiles could be present (see Sec. 6.2). We can, however, estimate the amount of volatiles that will sur- vive after each impact assuming that a fraction fr of the accreted material remains in the atmosphere rather than condensing on the planet. Therefore, after a given impact frMtotimpacc of material will be added to the atmosphere and the next impact could remove a maximum of Mtotatmloss from this added material. Assuming that fr = 1 (if impacts are frequent enough, e.g. LHB-like, material does not have c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 time to condense back on the surface), we compute the frac- tion of volatiles that would accumulate from subsequent im- pacts in Fig. 18. We note that some additional volatiles could be added by degassing of the planets' interiors but that fr may also be smaller so that the exact volatile mass that can accumulate depends on complex physics that cannot be modelled in this paper. We see that indeed, only planets f, g, and h have positive values (i.e. they gain volatiles over time) and therefore appear9 in Fig. 18 showing Mvol/Mincvol, 9 However, for fr < 0.2, the atmospheric mass loss takes over 10−610−510−410−310−210−1100q(au/yr)10−910−810−710−610−510−410−310−210−1Mtotimpacc/MincQ=100auQ=1auMatm/1M⊕PlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlaneth20 Q. Kral et al. and h might be more massive than that of the innermost planets of the TRAPPIST-1 system if cometary bombarde- ment has happened, and that a fraction of their composition should reflect the cometary abundances in this system. We note that the build-up of secondary atmospheres for planets f, g and h is mainly allowed by the impact velocities that are low enough on these outermost planets to both reduce the atmospheric mass loss after each impact and allow to deliver more volatiles (from larger bodies). 5.3.5 Delivery of water Figure 17. Ratio of accreted projectile mass over atmospheric mass lost for Q = 1 (solid) and 100au (dashed) for the different planets as a function of the slope of the size distribution. Mwater ∼ 2 × 10 −4 (cid:18) fvol (cid:19)(cid:18) fwat 0.2 0.5 (cid:19)−1 Water on Solar System comets makes up more than fwat = 50% of the volatiles (Mumma & Charnley 2011). Depending on fwat for exocomets, the amount of water Mwater delivered on the seven planets can be approximated by (cid:19)(cid:18) (cid:18) Q 10−5au/yr q (cid:19)−1 1au Minc, (18) where fvol ∼ 0.2 for exocomets (∼0.01 for asteroids) and fwat ∼ 0.5 (∼1 for asteroids). For example, for the single Earth-mass planet scattering scenario (i.e q ∼ 10−5au/yr, Q = 1au, and fin = 1), we find that a belt scattering at the same low rate as the current Kuiper-belt would result in the planets accreting ∼ 8 × 10−3 Earth oceans of water (or 10 times less for asteroid-like bodies), assuming that one Earth ocean equals 1.5×1021kg (see Mwatmin in Table 2). We note that for the planet chain case (where fin = 0.05), these values would be a factor 20 smaller and for a larger incoming mass Minc these values could go up by a factor more than 103 (see Eq. 12). We find that a belt of 20M⊕ (similar to the plausible belt mass we predict around TRAPPIST-1 in Sec. 2) that would scatter 5% of its mass over 7Gyr (i.e., Minc ∼ 1M⊕ fin) would deliver ∼ 1 Earth ocean of water to the planets for the single planet case and ∼ 0.04 Earth ocean for a planet chain (see MwatT in Table 2). For the Kozai scenario, we find that between ∼ 10−5 (pessimistic case with a Kuiper belt scattering rate) and ∼ 0.01 (optimist case with Minc ∼ 20M⊕) Earth oceans of water could be delivered to the planets. This delivered water will presumably recondense as ice on the surface of planet h (but when the star was younger this planet was in the HZ and water could have been in liquid form for a long period, see Sec. 6.1.2), but for warmer planets such as planets f and g, we expect that a rain cycle would create liquid water on these planets that would then be reinjected into the atmospheres cyclically (see Sec. 6.3). The temporal evolution of the build up of the amount of water in these secondary atmospheres can be obtained from Fig. 18 or from the coming Eq. 21 for planets f, g, and h. 6 DISCUSSION Figure 18. Volatile mass that can accumulate Mvol in the atmo- sphere impact after impact for a given incoming mass of cometary volatiles Mincvol with Mincvol = Mincfvol as a function of q for Q = 1 (solid lines) and 100au (dashed). The vertical black lines are typical q values for each scenario (see the text in Sec. 5.1). The primordial atmospheric masses of each planet are plotted as horizontal lines for an incoming mass in volatiles of 0.2M⊕ (i.e. Minc = 1M⊕ for fvol = 0.2), assuming an Earth-like density and composition. where Mincvol = Mincfvol is the incoming mass of volatiles. We can also derive a general formula as a function of q and Q (similar to Eq. 16) that gives the mass of volatiles that can accumulate Mvol rather than the total volatile mass de- livered. We do that in Sec. 6.1.2 and give the temporal evo- lution (assuming a constant rate of impact) of the build up of the secondary atmospheres that are created for planets f, g, and h (see Eq. 21). We thus conclude that the atmospheres of planets f, g for planets g and h (and for fr < 0.8 for planet f) so that no secondary atmospheres would accumulate in this case, but this neglects outgassing which would add more volatiles and would make it harder to not build up secondary atmospheres on these three planets. 6.1 Comparison between timescales of the different processes The consideration of timescales is important because it con- strains the duration over which atmosphere loss/gain occurs c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 −4.0−3.8−3.6−3.4−3.2−3.0Slopeofsizedistributionγ0246810Mtotimpacc/MtotatmlossQ=1auQ=100auPlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlaneth10−610−510−410−310−210−1100q(au/yr)10−910−810−710−610−510−410−310−210−1Mvol/MincvolQ=100auQ=1auMatm/0.2M⊕PlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlanethEffects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 21 This shows that the timescales over which the primordial atmospheres can be destroyed are much shorter than the age of the system. Therefore, we confirm the previous conclusion (see Sec. 5.3.2) that cometary impacts may have entirely stripped all planets of their primordial atmospheres by 7Gyr, even if the scattering rate is smaller by a factor more than 10 than assumed here (i.e., close to the Kuiper-belt scattering rate level). 6.1.2 Timescale to regenerate secondary atmospheres from impacts for planets f, g, and h We also compute the temporal evolution of the volatiles Mvol that are deposited and accumulate after each impact (i.e we take into account that subsequent impacts remove part of the volatiles delivered by the preceding impact as in Fig. 18). For planets g and h, Mvol is given by (for any q and Q) and is a factor 5 smaller for planet f. The amount of wa- ter delivered is simply Mwater = fwatMvol. Now, we work out the timescale to replenish the secondary atmospheres of planets g and h in cometary volatiles at the level of a 10−6M⊕ atmospheric mass treplenish ∼ 7Myr f −1 in f −1 vol 10−5au/yr 1au (cid:18) (cid:19)(cid:18) Q (cid:19) (cid:19)−1 q (cid:18) Msca 0.1M⊕/Gyr , (22) and a factor 5 longer for planet f. The replenishment timescale shows that in most physically motivated cases planets f, g, and h will have had time (over the age of the system) to rebuild secondary atmospheres with masses of at least 10−6M⊕, i.e., equal or greater than an Earth-like pri- mordial atmosphere. We note that most of the volatiles de- livered by the comets have low condensation temperatures and thus would remain in the atmosphere rather than go on the planet's surface but water could condense as ice on planet h and cycle from the surface to the atmosphere on planets f, g owing to rain (see Sec. 6.3). Therefore, we ex- pect Mvol to be a good estimate of the amounts of volatiles that can accumulate for planets f and g and note that up to 50% of the volatiles (to account for water) could transform into ice on planet g and thus reduce Mvol by a factor 2 (but this ice could outgas at a later stage because of the planet activity). Fig. 20 shows an example for the planet chain scenario with q = 10−5au/yr, Q = 1au, fin = 0.05 and fvol = 0.2 assuming Msca = 0.1M⊕/Gyr. We see that only planets f, g and h can accumulate volatiles over time (see section 5.3.4). For this planet chain scenario, planets g and h can get their atmospheres replenished by cometary volatiles at the level of their primordial atmospheres over a timescale of 500-700Myr and ∼6Gyr for planet f. We now compare the replenishment timescale to the evolution of the position of the HZ. Luger & Barnes (2015) Mvol(t) ∼ 10 −3finfvol (cid:18) (cid:18) t 10−5au/yr q (cid:19)(cid:18) (cid:19)−1(cid:18) Q 1au (cid:19)−1 (cid:19) Msca 7Gyr 0.1M⊕/Gyr M⊕, (21) Figure 19. Atmospheric mass loss Matmlossc as a function of time for a belt scattering at a constant rate Msca = 0.1M⊕/Gyr for 7Gyr. We assume the planet chain scenario with q = 10−5au/yr, Q = 1au, fin = 0.05. The primordial atmospheric mass of each planet is plotted as a horizontal line assuming an Earth-like density. compared with other processes which may be taking place, but which are beyond the scope of this manuscript to con- sider in detail. 6.1.1 Timescale to lose primordial atmospheres from impacts Assuming a constant rate of scattering Msca over 7Gyr, we compute the atmospheric mass lost as a function of time Matmlossc(t) ∼ 2 × 10 −3fin (cid:18) t q 10−5au/yr Msca (cid:18) (cid:19)(cid:18) (cid:19)−1 (cid:19)−1(cid:18) Q (cid:19) 1au 7Gyr 0.1M⊕/Gyr M⊕, (19) Msca = 0.1M⊕/Gyr corresponds to a where we note that belt with a total incoming mass of ∼1M⊕ fin, i.e similar to what would be expected for a 20M⊕ belt scattering 5% of its material over the age of the star. Matmlossc(t) becomes greater than an atmospheric mass of 10−6M⊕ for (cid:18) tdestroy ∼ 4Myr f −1 in q 10−5au/yr (cid:19) (cid:19)(cid:18) Q (cid:18) 1au Msca 0.1M⊕/Gyr (cid:19)−1 . (20) Now, we consider the planet chain scenario (i.e with q = 10−5au/yr, Q = 1au, and fin = 0.05) with a scattering rate Msca = 0.1M⊕/Gyr and look at the temporal evolution of the atmospheric mass loss Matmlossc(t) due to the series of impacts over the system's age as shown by Fig. 19. By com- paring to the primordial atmospheric masses of the planets (horizontal lines in Fig. 19), we see that for this scenario, it takes between 10 and 400Myr to destroy the primordial atmospheres of all seven planets (assuming an Earth-like at- mospheric density). This is very fast compared to the age of the system. c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 105106107108109Time(yr)10−810−710−610−510−410−3Matmlossc(M⊕)MatmPlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlaneth22 Q. Kral et al. Figure 20. Volatile mass that accumulates impact after impact Mvol as a function of time. We assume the planet chain scenario with q = 10−5au/yr, Q = 1au, fin = 0.05 and fvol = 0.2 and Msca = 0.1M⊕/Gyr. a constant comet input rate over 7Gyr of The primordial atmospheric mass of each planet is plotted as a horizontal line assuming an Earth-like density. show that for a 0.08M(cid:12) star, the HZ location moves inwards to its present-day position after ∼ 1Gyr. This means that planet h will be the first to enter the liquid water HZ, which it will do at a point when the closer-in planets are still in a runaway greenhouse state (assuming they have retained any atmospheres). According to the Luger & Barnes (2015) model, planet h crosses into the empirical habitable zone at ∼30Myr. Coupled with our results, this scenario indicates that planet h could have received significant volatile deliv- ery at a point in its history (i.e., between 30Myr and 1Gyr) when liquid water was stable at its surface (Fig. 20). This raises the prospect for an early carbon cycle being estab- lished on this planet, stabilising climate through water-rock interaction as is inferred for Earth (Walker et al. 1981). 6.2 Additional sources of volatiles 6.2.1 Volatiles created by vapourised material from the planet's surface during impact The volatile fraction that ends up in the atmospheres of the TRAPPIST-1 planets does not only build up from the im- pactor material but also from the vapourised material from the planet surface, as was probably the case for the Chicx- ulub impact that may have released large quantities of gas and dust contributing to the environmental stress that led to the demise of dinosaurs on Earth (Pope et al. 1997). From Okeefe & Ahrens (1977), we can estimate the vol- ume of material Vvap vapourised from a given meteoritic impact (with a volume Vpr). They find that Vvap = 0.4SVpr, where S = (ρpr/ρt)(Vimp/Cp)2, using the same notations as in previous sections and Cp being the bulk sound speed of planetary surface, which varies depending on the planet ground composition (Melosh 1989). We assume an Earth- like composition for which Cp ∼ 7km/s. We thus find that the vapour mass Mvap produced for a given impactor of mass Mimp is Mvap = 0.4Mimp(Vimp/(7km/s))2. However, some of the vapour ejecta will escape and only a fraction will have a low enough velocity to be retained in the atmosphere. Once again, using results from Shuvalov (2009), we get that the maximum ejected fraction of target material after impact is Mtaresc ∼ 0.02Mimp(Vimp/Vesc)2. This maximum is reached for bodies that are larger than ∼1km and for smaller bodies, the planet retains almost all of the target material created at impact. Of course, above a certain threshold it means that the whole target mass es- capes (as Mtaresc becomes greater than the total atmospheric mass), which is similar to the projectile mass behaviour (where volatiles from bodies larger than ∼10km cannot be retained in the atmosphere). We thus find that Mvap is a good indicator of the vapourised mass that will remain in the atmosphere (as Mtaresc (cid:28) Mvap). From Eq. 11, we notice that the mass delivered from the projectile quickly tends to Mimp for bodies smaller than about 10km. Thus, for planets g and h that have median impact velocities of ∼ 25 and 20km/s, Mvap will be slightly higher but of the same order of magnitude as Mimpacc. This means that some volatiles such as SO2, CO2 or water could also be formed from the vapourised planets' crust (see Pope et al. 1997). However, we note that the typically low con- centration of volatiles in planetary basalts that would form the bulk of a crust would not release as many volatiles as for the Chicxulub impact (e.g. Dreibus & Wanke 1987; Saal et al. 2002). 6.2.2 Outgassing on the planets Degassing may happen early during accretion when form- ing the planets but this is not a concern in our study as we expect the primordial atmospheres to be totally destroyed. Degassing from tectonic activity may also happen at a later stage that could affect the amount of volatiles in the atmo- spheres. Another way of producing degassing is from stellar induction heating. A recent study that focused on the effect of this mechanism on the TRAPPIST-1 planets finds that induction heating could create strong outgassing on planets b, c, d that are very close to their host star but it should not affect the outermost planets e, f, g, and h (Kislyakova et al. 2017). For the plate-tectonic degassing, we take the degassing on Earth as an upper bound because plate tectonics is very active on Earth and may be less efficient/active on other planets10. Earth produces ∼ 22km3 of basaltic magmas each year (Crisp 1984). Given a magma density of 2600kg/m3, we estimate a total degassing rate of ∼ 6×1013kg/yr. Assuming a typical water content of 0.3wt% and the extreme case of perfectly efficient degassing with no subduction recycling of water to the planet's mantle, we find that an upper bound on the tectonically driven water degassing rate is ∼ 3 × 10−5 M⊕/Gyr (0.11 Earth oceans per Gyr). Therefore, if the tectonic activity on planets f, g and h were as active as on Earth, degassing of water could occur at a similar rate to the water delivered from impacting comets (see Table 2), thus enhancing the amount of water on planets f, g and h. 10 We note that a recent study shows that even for planets in the stagnant lid regime (i.e., without plate-tectonics), volcanic outgassing rates suitable for habitability could possibly be main- tained (Foley & Smye 2017). c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 107108109Time(yr)10−810−710−610−510−410−3Mvol(M⊕)MatmPlanetbPlanetcPlanetdPlanetePlanetfPlanetgPlanethEffects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 23 6.2.3 Volatiles that are ejected of the atmosphere and reaccreted later The material that escapes the planetary atmospheres after each impact because they have velocities greater than the escape velocity will end up in an eccentric torus around the star close to the given planet location (e.g. Jackson et al. 2014; Cataldi et al. 2017). The eccentricity will vary depend- ing on the ejection velocity of the material. While we expect that high-velocity ejecta may reach neighbouring planets (e.g. in a Panspermia-manner, Krijt et al. 2017; Lingam & Loeb 2017), most of the material in the torus would interact with the planet it has been ejected from. We note that for an Earth-like planet on a slightly wider orbit than planet h, the escape velocity (of about 10km/s) could become greater than the planet's Keplerian velocity and thus the material would not form a torus but rather be ejected on unbound orbits. The fate of the material in the torus is not straightfor- ward to model. The material could deplete collisionally due to high-velocity collisions in the elliptic torus and be ground down to dust, which would be blown out from the system by stellar wind radiation pressure (Wyatt 2008) and at the same time eject the ices or volatiles present on the grains. While the ejecta is also partly made up of gas, one could also expect that the gas material (at least the fraction that is not blown out by radiation pressure) in the torus will viscously spread (maybe dragging dust with it) and end up on more distant planets. The fate of the material that would be able to interact with a planet for a long enough timescale is to be reaccreted onto the progenitor planet (Wyatt et al. 2017). The exact outcome depends on the exact chemico-physical conditions in the TRAPPIST-1 planets environment, which is not known, and thus goes beyond the scope of this paper. 6.3 Composition of the atmospheres at the end of the impact process Thanks to our model, we are able to retrieve the amount of volatiles that is delivered to the different planets as well as the atmospheric mass removed by a long-term series of im- pacts. For the outermost planets, we find that the volatiles delivered by impacts may accumulate and be abundant, which could give us a way to constrain the atmospheric composition of planets f, g, h, the former two being in the HZ. However, we need to understand how these delivered volatiles would evolve in their new atmospheres to predict the current atmospheric compositions of these planets. They could chemically react to form new species, condense on the surface as ice and some additional volatiles may be produced as seen in the previous Sec. 6.2. For instance, the delivered water will presumably con- dense as ice on the surface of the colder planet h (when it finishes being in the HZ, see Sec. 6.1.2) but for warmer plan- ets in the HZ (e.g. planets f and g), a rain cycle could create liquid water on the planets that is then reinjected into the atmospheres cyclically. Volatiles such as CO, CO2, or CH4 have a low condensation temperature and will remain in the atmosphere along with other similar volatiles delivered by the comets. However, when liquid water is on the planet, this can draw the CO2 content down by silicate weathering c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 that fixes CO2 in the planet's surface (forming carbonates) as shown in Siever (1968). Over longer timescales, these volatiles can further chem- ically react to form new molecules. However, the exact com- position of the delivered volatiles depends on the composi- tion of exocomets in our scenario. The latter has been found to be consistent with the composition of comets in our Solar System (e.g. Matr`a et al. 2017a) but there is still a wide range of observed compositions amongst the Solar System's comets (e.g. Mumma & Charnley 2011). Another complication is that, as discussed in the pre- vious subsection 6.2, volatiles may also be formed from the vapourised planet's crust during impact, from outgassing and even by reaccretion of previously ejected material, which would mix with the volatiles delivered by impacts. All of these factors (active chemistry, potential addi- tional volatiles, exocomet composition) makes it hard to pre- dict the exact final compositions of the atmospheres after a few Gyr of evolution. An atmosphere model that would make assumptions about what happens without impacts could be fed by our impact predictions to come up with a plausible likely composition, but this goes beyond the scope of the present paper. We note however that these extra sources of volatiles do not change our conclusion that in the presence of a belt scattering comets, the atmospheres of the outermost planets f, g, h should be more massive. 6.4 Impacts in very dense Venus-like atmospheres We note that our model is not valid for very massive atmo- spheres. If the atmospheres of planets f, g, h become mas- sive enough (Venus-like, i.e., 200bars) due to impacts (or if the primordial atmospheres were Venus-like), 1-10km im- pactors do not create craters anymore but rather decelerate and get fragmented before touching the ground and create big aerial bursts that are very effective at removing atmo- spheric mass (Shuvalov et al. 2014). The amount of accreted projectile material is also very high (close to 100%) for these aerial burst type of impacts (Shuvalov et al. 2014). There- fore, for very dense atmospheres, we expect an increased delivery of volatiles from the impactors and less from the vapourised crust. We also expect that Venus-like primordial atmospheres would still be destroyed, since those impacts are more effective at removing mass, therefore not changing our conclusions. 6.5 Implications for life on these planets One of the prime motives in searching for planets orbiting very low mass stars is to study the chemical composition of their atmospheres, and discover whether they contain large quantities of gas of a likely biological origin (e.g. Seager et al. 2016). Here, we consider the implications of our results concerning impacts towards creating the first forms of life. Many elements can affect the emergence of life, most of which currently remain unconstrained empirically. We chose to apply our study to the TRAPPIST-1 system because its seven planets mark an important milestone. In addition to the multiple advantages of having a very low-mass host star for atmospheric characterisation (e.g. He et al. 2017), these seven worlds allow us to compare each to one another. All 24 Q. Kral et al. seven have followed a similar history in terms of UV irradi- ation for instance (modulo their distance to the star). Here we have tried to quantify whether all planets would receive a similar impact history, which may be important to kick start life as explained further. UV irradiation has often been seen as prejudicial to hab- itability. Its main disadvantages are: 1) to photodissociate water molecules, of which the hydrogen is then lost to the space, depleting its oceans (e.g. Bourrier et al. 2017), and 2) to break complex molecules on the surface, and affect replication (e.g. O'Malley-James & Kaltenegger 2017). The situation is particularly sensitive for planets orbiting very low-mass stars like TRAPPIST-1, since these spend a long time contracting onto the main-sequence, in a 1 Gyr stage of particularly heightened far UV activity (e.g. Rugheimer et al. 2015). However, these issues might be mitigated by several effects: 1) Ocean loss depends on the initial water reser- voir (e.g. Ribas et al. 2016; Bolmont et al. 2017), and the TRAPPIST-1 planets might have been initially rich in wa- ter, having possibly assembled beyond the snow-line (Alib- ert & Benz 2017; Ormel et al. 2017) and/or accreted water at a later stage owing to impacts (as shown in this study); 2) UV photons do not penetrate water well, and organisms can protect themselves under a few metres of water (e.g. Es- trela & Valio 2017); 3) UV irradiation accelerates mutations, leading to Darwinian evolution; 4) the non-illuminated side of a tidally synchronised planet is protected; and 5) UV ir- radiation, impacts, and a hard surface might be required to kick-start life (abiogenesis). The literature contains much debate on many of the points above, except on the very last one, which we describe in more detail here as it is related to the outcome of this paper. Recent advances in biochemistry (summarised in Sutherland 2017) have shown a prebiotic chemical path lead- ing from hydrogen cyanide (HCN) to formaldehyde (CH2O), a known precursor to ribonucleotides (the building block to biologically relevant molecules such as ATP, RNA and DNA), amino acids (required for proteins) and lipids (Patel et al. 2015). Hydrogen cyanide, the initial molecule needed to inititate the process, can be produced in the plasma cre- ated when impactors enter in contact with an atmosphere (Ferus et al. 2015). In the presence of UV radiation, hy- drogen cyanide can then react with other compounds that can be found concentrated on a planetary surface to cre- ate the building blocks of life. The impactor itself may have another role to play, which is to excavate underground ma- terial, and reveal chemically interesting strata (Patel et al. 2015), thereby acting as a chemical reactor. We show in this paper that, if a belt scattering comets is present in the system, numerous impacts with different ener- gies will happen throughout the history of the TRAPPIST-1 planets. From these impacts, we expect to create a subse- quent amount of HCN in the impactor plasma (Ferus et al. 2015). We also note that as HCN is found in comets (e.g. Mumma & Charnley 2011), it may also be present on the potential exocomets of TRAPPIST-1 and be delivered along with the other volatiles (e.g. see Matr`a et al. 2017b). We also emphasise that if the planets are tidally locked, it does not affect the emergence of life in this scenario as we predict that about half of the impacts would happen on the night side and the other half on the day side so that the UV photons from the star necessary for reactions to happen will be able to play their role. Thus, our scenario offers the seed to create the first building blocks of life and more detailed modelling is needed to quantify how many ribonucleotides, amino acids and lipids could be created from the impact properties (e.g. im- pact velocities, rate of impacts) we predict. This is beyond the scope of this paper but should give birth to new inter- esting studies in the near future. Panspermia may also be viable to transport some potential life forms to other plan- ets, which can enhance the probability of life spreading in the system (Krijt et al. 2017; Lingam & Loeb 2017). To conclude, we cannot be certain yet that such a path is where biology originated, however, it provides a different narrative, one that requires UV irradiation, impacts and a limited amount of water. Ultraviolet, in this context, be- comes beneficial by removing excess liquid water and trans- forming hydrogen cyanide into formaldehyde, whereas im- pacts would bring in energy to create hydrogen cyanide, and replenish the planet in volatiles such as water, much like what happened in the LHB (e.g. Court & Sephton 2014; Nesvorn´y et al. 2017) after a desiccating moon-forming im- pact (e.g. Canup 2014). 7 CONCLUSION In this paper, we have studied the effects of impacts on the seven TRAPPIST-1 planets in terms of atmospheric mass loss and delivery of volatiles and water. We derive general results for any scenario where the comet pericentres slowly migrate inwards at a rate q. We also specifically test three scenarios for the delivery of comets from an outer belt to the inner planets (located within 0.1au): 1) Planet scattering by a single or a chain of planets, 2) An outer companion forcing Kozai oscillations on comets leading them to small pericen- tres, 3) Galactic tides on an exo-Oort cloud. We model these three scenarios by a steadily decreasing pericentre (constant q) that is quantified in Sec. 4 for each of the scenarios. The results can be summed up as follows: • We find that applying a minimum mass TRAPPIST- 1 nebula approach lead to a surface density Σ ∼ 122 (r/1au)−1.97 kg/m2. We show that a potential belt around TRAPPIST-1 could not survive within 10au because of collisional erosion (if it was created at the end of the proto- planetary disc phase). Assuming that such a belt is between 10 and 50au, and extrapolating the derived minimum sur- face density, we infer that this belt would have mass of at least 20M⊕ and may be observable in the far-IR or sub-mm with ALMA (see Sec. 2). • We ran a suite of N-body simulations to understand the dynamics of comets that impact onto the seven different planets. We find the impact and ejection probabilities for each comet's orbit (see Figs. 2 and 3). We also provide the accretion timescales for these different comet families (see Fig. 4). We analytically explain the main dependencies for these probabilities and timescales. • We give the impact velocity distributions for each planet, and we find that they typically have double-peaked profiles (see Fig. 6). The median impact velocity for planet b is close to 100km/s, whilst for planet h, it is close to 20km/s c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 Effects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 25 (see Fig. 7). These impact velocities are always much above the escape velocities of the planets and gravitational focus- ing is not important. • We find that the fraction of comets accreted on each planet depends on the decreasing rate of pericentres ( q) and apocentre Q (scaling as q−1Q−1). We find two regimes, for small q, most of the impacts end up on planets g and h and for higher q, each planet gets a fraction of comets accreted (see Fig. 12). • The atmospheric removal is dominated by comets of a few km in diameter (see Fig. 13 left). • The delivery of volatiles is only possible for comets (cid:46) 3km in size (see Fig 13 right). For bigger comets, the projectile material escapes and no delivery is possible. • We find that the higher impact velocities for the inner- most planets lead to a higher atmospheric removal rate for a given cometary impact rate and a lower amount of volatile delivered. • In general, we find that if the incoming mass of regions Minc > 5 × (cid:1) M⊕, the primordial atmospheres of 10−4(cid:16) (cid:17)(cid:0) Q reach the inner comets that q 10−5au/yr 1au q −1 vol (cid:16) 10−5au/yr (cid:17)(cid:0) Q (cid:1) M⊕ (where fvol is the seven planets would be totally destroyed (see Fig. 15), i.e a belt with a low scattering rate similar to the current Kuiper belt is enough to destroy all primordial planetary at- mospheres. • We quantify the amount of water lost owing to impacts and find that it is similar (possibly higher) to the amount of water lost through hydrodynamic escape (see Sec. 5.3.3 and Table. 3). • As for the delivery of volatiles to the comets (see Fig. 16), we find that planets g and h (and most likely f) may retain volatiles from the impacting comets in their at- mospheres and the conclusion holds for any size distribution of incoming comets between -3 and -4 (see Fig. 17). • We thus predict that if the planets were hit by comets, the atmospheres of planets f, g, and h would be more massive, which could be checked by future missions in the next decade. • We also show that for an incoming mass of comets Minc > 5 × 10−4f the volatile fraction on solids), the volatile mass delivered by comets is greater than Earth-like atmospheric masses (as- suming Earth-like densities for the 7 planets). • We provide a prescription for the amount of water or volatiles that can accumulate as a function of time (see Eq. 21) that could be used to feed an atmospheric model to check the actual composition of atmospheres dominated by the delivery of comets. • We find that a large quantity of volatiles may have been delivered to planet h while it was still in the liquid water habitable zone. • We find that a planet chain that would scatter comets from an exo-Kuiper belt or an outer companion that would force Kozai oscillations on a comet belt are two plausible mechanisms to throw an important number of comets on the seven planets over the system's lifetime (see Secs. 4.1 and 4.2). • On the other hand, we rule out a potential Oort-cloud around TRAPPIST-1 as being a significant source of im- pacting comets (see Sec. 5.1.2). • For the planet-scattering scenario, we find that even a belt with a low scattering rate similar to the current Kuiper- 1au c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 belt is enough to destroy typical Earth-like primordial at- mospheres for the seven planets. Taking into account that typically observed debris belts are much more massive than the Kuiper belt, we find that the Kozai (slightly less effi- cient) scenario can also strip primordial atmospheres even if the impact process only lasts a fraction of the system's age. • As for the volatile delivery, we find that for the planet- scattering scenario, planets f, g, and h can get (more than) an Earth ocean mass of water (and other volatiles) delivered, which can accumulate impact after impact. We find that the primordial atmospheres are gradually replaced by cometary material and may lead to subsequent build up of new sec- ondary atmospheres with exocomet-like compositions. These new secondary atmospheres may become more massive than the initial primordial atmospheres. • Table 2 summarises the results for the different scenar- ios as for the minimum scattered (incoming) mass needed to destroy the primordial atmospheres and the volatile/water masses that can be delivered onto each planet. • We also discuss the implications of impacts to create the building blocks of life. We detail new emerging pathways that can lead to life showing that UV irradiation, impacts and a hard planetary surface might be enough to kick start biological reactions and form ATP, RNA, DNA, amino acids and lipids that are essential to life (see Sec. 6.5). In brief, we find that the primordial atmospheres of the seven planets orbiting around TRAPPIST-1 would not sur- vive over the lifetime of the system if a belt scattering comets at a similar low rate than the Kuiper belt (or faster) were around TRAPPIST-1. According to our calculations based on applying a minimum mass extrasolar nebula approach for the TRAPPIST-1 system, we expect a potential 20M⊕ belt may have survived around TRAPPIST-1 that would be ob- servable with ALMA. We also show that a large fraction of the delivered cometary volatiles remains in the atmospheres of the outermost planets f, g and h, which gradually replace their primordial atmospheres. We predict that the new sec- ondary atmospheres of planets f, g and h may be more mas- sive than that of the innermost planets (which may soon be checkable/observable with the JWST) and their compo- sition might be dominated by the composition of exocomets in this system (i.e., impacts leave an imprint). We also pre- dict that more than an Earth ocean mass of water could be delivered to planets f, g, and h owing to impacts that may be in liquid form on planets f and g. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is dedicated to Mila. We thank the two refer- ees for comments that greatly improved the quality of the paper. QK and MCW acknowledge funding from STFC via the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge Consolidated Grant. QK thanks J. Teyssandier for interesting discussions about the Kozai mechanism. Simulations in this paper made use of the REBOUND code which can be downloaded freely at http://github.com/hannorein/rebound. 26 Q. Kral et al. REFERENCES Abe, Y., Ohtani, E., Okuchi, T., Righter, K., & Drake, M. 2000, Origin of the Earth and Moon, 413 Alberti, T., Carbone, V., Lepreti, F., & Vecchio, A. 2017, arXiv:1706.06005 Alibert, Y., & Benz, W. 2017, A & A, 598, L5 Anglada, G., Amado, P. J., Ortiz, J. L., et al. 2017, ApJ, 850, L6 Antognini, J. M. O. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3610 Baraffe, I., Homeier, D., Allard, F., & Chabrier, G. 2015, A & A, 577, A42 Barstow, J. K., & Irwin, P. G. J. 2016, MNRAS, 461, L92 Batygin, K., & Morbidelli, A. 2017, AJ, 154, 229 Beust, H., Vidal-Madjar, A., Ferlet, R., & Lagrange-Henri, A. M. 1990, A & A, 236, 202 Bolmont, E., Selsis, F., Owen, J. E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3728 Bonsor, A., Augereau, J.-C., & Th´ebault, P. 2012, A & A, 548, A104 Bonsor, A., Raymond, S. N., Augereau, J.-C., & Ormel, C. W. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2380 Booth, M., Wyatt, M. C., Morbidelli, A., Moro-Mart´ın, A., & Levison, H. F. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 385 Boss, A. P., Weinberger, A. J., Keiser, S. A., et al. 2017, arXiv:1708.02200 Bourrier, V., Ehrenreich, D., Wheatley, P. J., et al. 2017, A & A, 599, L3 Breiter, S., & Ratajczak, R. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1222 Burgasser, A. J., & Mamajek, E. E. 2017, arXiv:1706.02018 Canup, R. M. 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 372, 20130175 Carone, L., Keppens, R., & Decin, L. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 1981 Cataldi, G., Brandeker, A., Th´ebault, P., et al. 2017, As- trobiology, 17, 721 Chiang, E., & Laughlin, G. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3444 Court, R. W., & Sephton, M. A. 2014, GCA, 145, 175 Crisp, J. A. 1984, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 20, 177 Fabrycky, D., & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298 Ferus, M., Nesvorn´y, D., Sponer, J., et al. 2015, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Science, 112, 657 Foley, B. J., & Smye, A. J. 2017, arXiv:1712.03614 Fouchard, M., Froeschl´e, C., Valsecchi, G., & Rickman, H. 2006, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 95, 299 Fraser, W. C., & Kavelaars, J. J. 2009, AJ, 137, 72 Frewen, S. F. N., & Hansen, B. M. S. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2442 Gaidos, E. 2017, MNRAS, 470, L1 Gillon, M., Jehin, E., Lederer, S. M., et al. 2016, Nature, 533, 221 Gillon, M., Triaud, A. H. M. J., Demory, B.-O., et al. 2017, Nature, 542, 456 Godolt, M., Grenfell, J. L., Kitzmann, D., et al. 2016, A & A, 592, A36 Grimm, S. L., Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., et al. 2018, arXiv:1802.01377 Haworth, T. J., Facchini, S., Clarke, C. J., & Mohanty, S. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 5460 Hayashi, C. 1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supple- ment, 70, 35 He, M. Y., Triaud, A. H. M. J., & Gillon, M. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2687 Heisler, J., & Tremaine, S. 1986, Icarus, 65, 13 Hendler, N. P., Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., et al. 2017, ApJ, 841, 116 Howell, S. B., Everett, M. E., Horch, E. P., et al. 2016, ApJ, 829, L2 Innanen, K. A., Zheng, J. Q., Mikkola, S., & Valtonen, M. J. 1997, AJ, 113, 1915 Jackson, A. P., Wyatt, M. C., Bonsor, A., & Veras, D. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 3757 Janson, M., Hormuth, F., Bergfors, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 44 Kaib, N. A., & Quinn, T. 2009, Science, 325, 1234 Kennedy, G. M., & Wyatt, M. C. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1253 Kiefer, F., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Boissier, J., et al. 2014, Nature, 514, 462 de Niem, D., Kuhrt, E., Morbidelli, A., & Motschmann, U. Kislyakova, K. G., Noack, L., Johnstone, C. P., et al. 2017, 2012, Icarus, 221, 495 de Wit, J., Wakeford, H. R., Gillon, M., et al. 2016, Nature, 537, 69 arXiv:1710.08761 Kozai, Y. 1962, AJ, 67, 591 Kral, Q., Th´ebault, P., Augereau, J.-C., Boccaletti, A., & de Wit, J., Wakeford, H. R., Lewis, N., et al. 2018, Charnoz, S. 2015, A & A, 573, A39 arXiv:1802.02250 Kral, Q., Wyatt, M., Carswell, R. F., et al. 2016, MNRAS, Di Sisto, R. P., Fern´andez, J. A., & Brunini, A. 2009, 461, 845 Icarus, 203, 140 Dohnanyi, J. S. 1969, J. Geophys. Res. , 74, 2531 Dreibus, G., & Wanke, H. 1987, Icarus, 71, 225 Duncan, M. J., & Levison, H. F. 1997, Science, 276, 1670 Duncan, M., Quinn, T., & Tremaine, S. 1987, AJ, 94, 1330 Ehlmann, B. L., Anderson, F. S., Andrews-Hanna, J., et al. 2016, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 121, 1927 Kral, Q., Krivov, A. V., Defr`ere, D., et al. 2017, The As- tronomical Review, 13, 69 Kral, Q., Clarke, C., & Wyatt, M. 2017, Handbook of Ex- oplanets, Edited by Hans J. Deeg and Juan Antonio Bel- monte. Springer Living Reference Work, ISBN: 978-3-319- 30648-3, 2017, id.165, 165 Kral, Q., Matr`a, L., Wyatt, M. C., & Kennedy, G. M. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 521 Eiroa, C., Rebollido, I., Montesinos, B., et al. 2016, A & Krijt, S., Bowling, T. J., Lyons, R. J., & Ciesla, F. J. 2017, A, 594, L1 ApJ, 839, L21 Eiroa, C., Marshall, J. P., Mora, A., et al. 2013, A & A, Lawler, S. M., Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J. J., et al. 2018, 555, A11 AJ, 155, 197 Emel'Yanenko, V. V., Asher, D. J., & Bailey, M. E. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 779 Levison, H. F., & Duncan, M. J. 1997, Icarus, 127, 13 Levison, H. F., Duncan, M. J., Brasser, R., & Kaufmann, Estrela, R., & Valio, A. 2017, arXiv:1708.05400 D. E. 2010, Science, 329, 187 c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 Effects of impacts on the TRAPPIST-1 planets 27 Levison, H. F., Morbidelli, A., Tsiganis, K., Nesvorn´y, D., Quarles, B., Quintana, E. V., Lopez, E., Schlieder, J. E., & Gomes, R. 2011, AJ, 142, 152 & Barclay, T. 2017, ApJ, 842, L5 Lidov, M. L. 1962, Planet. Space Sci. , 9, 719 Lingam, M., & Loeb, A. 2017, Proceedings of the National Ranjan, S., Wordsworth, R., & Sasselov, D. D. 2017, ApJ, 843, 110 Academy of Science, 114, 6689 Raymond, S. N., Quinn, T., & Lunine, J. I. 2004, Icarus, Lithwick, Y., & Naoz, S. 2011, ApJ, 742, 94 Liu, B., Munoz, D. J., & Lai, D. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 747 Luger, R., & Barnes, R. 2015, Astrobiology, 15, 119 Luger, R., Sestovic, M., Kruse, E., et al. 2017, Nature As- tronomy, 1, 0129 MacGregor, M. A., Weinberger, A. J., Wilner, D. J., Kowal- 168, 1 Read, M. J., & Wyatt, M. C. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 465 Rein, H., & Liu, S.-F. 2012, A & A, 537, A128 Rein, H., & Spiegel, D. S. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 1424 Rein, H., & Tamayo, D. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 376 Ribas, I., Bolmont, E., Selsis, F., et al. 2016, A & A, 596, ski, A. F., & Cranmer, S. R. 2018, ApJ, 855, L2 A111 Marboeuf, U., Bonsor, A., & Augereau, J.-C. 2016, Planet. Space Sci. , 133, 47 Marino, S., Matr`a, L., Stark, C., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 2933 Rickman, H., Fouchard, M., Froeschl´e, C., & Valsecchi, G. B. 2008, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astron- omy, 102, 111 Rickman, H. 2014, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 49, Marino, S., Wyatt, M. C., Pani´c, O., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 8 465, 2595 Marino, S., Bonsor, A., Wyatt, M. C., & Kral, Q. 2018, MNRAS, Rodler, F., & L´opez-Morales, M. 2014, ApJ, 781, 54 Roettenbacher, R. M., & Kane, S. R. 2017, arXiv:1711.02676 Matese, J. J., & Whitman, P. G. 1992, Celestial Mechanics Rotundi, A., Sierks, H., Della Corte, V., et al. 2015, Sci- and Dynamical Astronomy, 54, 13 ence, 347, aaa3905 Matr`a, L., Wilner, D. J., Oberg, K. I., et al. 2017, subm. Matr`a, L., MacGregor, M. A., Kalas, P., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 9 Melosh, H. J. 1989, Research supported by NASA. New York, Oxford University Press (Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, No. 11), 1989, 253 p., 11, Montgomery, S. L., & Welsh, B. Y. 2012, PASP , 124, 1042 Morbidelli, A., Brown, M. E., & Levison, H. F. 2003, Earth Rugheimer, S., Segura, A., Kaltenegger, L., & Sasselov, D. 2015, ApJ, 806, 137 Saal, A. E., Hauri, E. H., Langmuir, C. H., & Perfit, M. R. 2002, Nature, 419, 451 Saladino, R., Crestini, C., Pino, S., Costanzo, G., & Di Mauro, E. 2012, Physics of Life Reviews, 9, 84 Schlichting, H. E., Sari, R., & Yalinewich, A. 2015, Icarus, 247, 81 Moon and Planets, 92, 1 Seager, S., Bains, W., & Petkowski, J. J. 2016, Astrobiol- Morley, C. V., Kreidberg, L., Rustamkulov, Z., Robinson, ogy, 16, 465 T., & Fortney, J. J. 2017, arXiv:1708.04239 Mumma, M. J., & Charnley, S. B. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 471 Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar system dynam- ics by C.D. Murray and S.F. McDermott. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), ISBN 0-521-57295-9 (hc.), ISBN 0-521-57297-4 (pbk.)., Naoz, S. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 441 Nesvold, E. R., Naoz, S., Vican, L., & Farr, W. M. 2016, Shannon, A., Wu, Y., & Lithwick, Y. 2016, ApJ, 818, 175 Shuvalov, V. 2009, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 44, 1095 Shuvalov, V., Kuhrt, E., de Niem, D., & Wunnemann, K. 2014, Planet. Space Sci. , 98, 120 Siever, R. 1968, Sedimentology, 11, 5 Sutherland, J. D. 2017, Nature Reviews Chemistry, , 1, 0012 ApJ, 826, 19 Tamayo, D., Rein, H., Petrovich, C., & Murray, N. 2017, Nesvorn´y, D., Jenniskens, P., Levison, H. F., et al. 2010, ApJ, 840, L19 ApJ, 713, 816 Teyssandier, J., Naoz, S., Lizarraga, I., & Rasio, F. A. 2013, Nesvorn´y, D., & Morbidelli, A. 2012, AJ, 144, 117 Nesvorn´y, D., Roig, F., & Bottke, W. F. 2017, AJ, 153, 103 O'Keefe, J. D., & Ahrens, T. J. 1977, Science, 198, 1249 O'Malley-James, J. T., & Kaltenegger, L. 2017, MNRAS, 469, L26 Ormel, C. W., Ida, S., & Tanaka, H. 2012, ApJ, 758, 80 Ormel, C. W., Liu, B., & Schoonenberg, D. 2017, A & A, 604, A1 Patel, R. I., Metchev, S. A., Heinze, A., & Trollo, J. 2017, AJ, 153, 54 ApJ, 779, 166 Th´ebault, P., & Augereau, J.-C. 2007, A & A, 472, 169 Theissen, C. A., & West, A. A. 2014, ApJ, 794, 146 Tremaine, S. 1993, Planets Around Pulsars, 36, 335 Turbet, M., Leconte, J., Selsis, F., et al. 2016, A & A, 596, A112 Unterborn, C. T., Desch, S. J., Hinkel, N. R., & Lorenzo, A. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 297 Veras, D., & Evans, N. W. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 403 Vitense, C., Krivov, A. V., & Lohne, T. 2010, A & A, 520, Patel, B. H., Percivalle, C., Ritson, D. J., Duffy, C. D., & A32 Sutherland, J. D. 2015, Nature Chemistry, 7, 301 Petrovich, C., & Munoz, D. J. 2017, ApJ, 834, 116 Plavchan, P., Werner, M. W., Chen, C. H., et al. 2009, ApJ, Vitense, C., Krivov, A. V., Kobayashi, H., & Lohne, T. 2012, A & A, 540, A30 Walker, J. C. G., Hays, P. B., & Kasting, J. F. 1981, J. Geo- 698, 1068 Poch, O., Frey, J., Roditi, I., et al. 2017, Astrobiology, 17, 231 Pope, K. O., Baines, K. H., Ocampo, A. C., & Ivanov, B. A. 1997, J. Geophys. Res. , 102, 21645 phys. Res. , 86, 9776 Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, Ap&SS , 51, 153 Wisdom, J. 1980, AJ, 85, 1122 Wolf, E. T. 2017, ApJ, 839, L1 Wyatt, M. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 339 c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28 28 Q. Kral et al. Wyatt, M. C., Bonsor, A., Jackson, A. P., Marino, S., & Shannon, A. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3385 c(cid:13) 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–28
1111.5621	1	1111	2011-11-23T21:00:56	The Flat Transmission Spectrum of the Super-Earth GJ1214b from Wide Field Camera 3 on the Hubble Space Telescope	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.IM" ]	Capitalizing on the observational advantage offered by its tiny M dwarf host, we present HST/WFC3 grism measurements of the transmission spectrum of the super-Earth exoplanet GJ1214b. These are the first published WFC3 observations of a transiting exoplanet atmosphere. After correcting for a ramp-like instrumental systematic, we achieve nearly photon-limited precision in these observations, finding the transmission spectrum of GJ1214b to be flat between 1.1 and 1.7 microns. Inconsistent with a cloud-free solar composition atmosphere at 8.2 sigma, the measured achromatic transit depth most likely implies a large mean molecular weight for GJ1214b's outer envelope. A dense atmosphere rules out bulk compositions for GJ1214b that explain its large radius by the presence of a very low density gas layer surrounding the planet. High-altitude clouds can alternatively explain the flat transmission spectrum, but they would need to be optically thick up to 10 mbar or consist of particles with a range of sizes approaching 1 micron in diameter.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version December 20, 2013 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateap j v. 11/10/09 1 1 0 2 v o N 3 2 ] P E . h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 1 2 6 5 . 1 1 1 1 : v i X r a THE FLAT TRANSMISSION SPECTRUM OF THE SUPER-EARTH GJ1214B FROM WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3 ON THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE Zachory K. Berta1 , David Charbonneau1 , Jean-Michel D´esert1 , Eliza Miller-Ricci Kempton2,8 , Peter R. McCullough3,4 , Christopher J. Burke5 , Jonathan J. Fortney2 , Jonathan Irwin1 , Philip Nutzman2 , Derek Homeier6,7 Draft version December 20, 2013 ABSTRACT Capitalizing on the observational advantage offered by its tiny M dwarf host, we present HST/WFC3 grism measurements of the transmission spectrum of the super-Earth exoplanet GJ1214b. These are the first published WFC3 observations of a transiting exoplanet atmosphere. After correcting for a ramp-like instrumental systematic, we achieve nearly photon-limited precision in these observations, finding the transmission spectrum of GJ1214b to be flat between 1.1 and 1.7 µm. Inconsistent with a cloud-free solar composition atmosphere at 8.2σ , the measured achromatic transit depth most likely implies a large mean molecular weight for GJ1214b’s outer envelope. A dense atmosphere rules out bulk compositions for GJ1214b that explain its large radius by the presence of a very low density gas layer surrounding the planet. High-altitude clouds can alternatively explain the flat transmission spectrum, but they would need to be optically thick up to 10 mbar or consist of particles with a range of sizes approaching 1 µm in diameter. Subject headings: planetary systems: individual (GJ 1214b) — eclipses — techniques: spectroscopic 1. INTRODUCTION With a radius of 2.7 R⊕ and a mass of 6.5 M⊕ , the transiting planet GJ1214b (Charbonneau et al. 2009) is a member of the growing population of exoplanets whose masses and radii are known to be between those of Earth and Neptune (see L´eger et al. 2009; Batalha et al. 2011; Lissauer et al. 2011; Winn et al. 2011). Among these exoplanets, most of which exhibit such shallow transits that they require ultra-precise space-based photometry simply to detect the existence of their transits, GJ1214b is unique. The diminutive 0.21 R(cid:12) radius of its M dwarf stellar host means GJ1214b exhibits a large 1.4% tran- sit depth, and the system’s proximity (13 pc) means the star is bright enough in the near infrared (H = 9.1) that follow-up observations to study the planet’s atmosphere are currently feasible. In this work, we exploit this ob- servational advantage and present new measurements of the planet’s atmosphere, which bear upon models for its interior composition and structure. According to theoretical studies (Seager et al. 2007; Rogers & Seager 2010; Nettelmann et al. 2011), GJ1214b’s 1.9 g cm−3 bulk density is high enough to [email protected] 1 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 3 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 4 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 5 SETI Institute/NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 244-30, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 6 Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon, UMR 5574, CNRS, Universit´e de Lyon, ´Ecole Normale Sup´erieure de Lyon, 46 All´ee d’Italie, F-69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France 7 Institut fur Astrophysik, George-August-Universitat, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Gottingen, Germany 8 Sagan Fellow require a larger ice or rock core fraction than the solar system ice giants but far too low to be explained with an entirely Earth-like composition. Rogers & Seager (2010) have proposed three general scenarios consistent with GJ1214b’s large radius, where the planet could (i) have accreted and maintained a nebular H2 /He envelope atop an ice and rock core, (ii) consist of a rocky planet with an H2 -rich envelope that formed by recent outgassing, or (iii) contain a large fraction of water in its interior sur- rounded by a dense H2 -depleted, H2O-rich atmosphere. Detailed thermal evolution calculations by Nettelmann et al. (2011) disfavor this last model on the basis that it would require unreasonably large bulk water-to-rock ratios, arguing for at least a partial H2/He envelope, al- beit one that might be heavily enriched in H2O relative to the primordial nebula. By measuring GJ1214b’s transmission spectrum, we can empirically constrain the mean molecular weight of the planet’s atmosphere, thus distinguishing among these possibilities. When the planet passes in front of its host M dwarf, a small fraction of the star’s light passes through the upper layers of the planet’s atmosphere be- fore reaching us; the planet’s transmission spectrum is then manifested in variations of the transit depth as a function of wavelength. The amplitude of the transit depth variations ∆D(λ) in the transmission spectrum scale as nH × 2H Rp/R2 (cid:63) , where nH is set by the opacities involved and can be 1-10 for strong absorption features, H is the atmospheric scale height, Rp is the planetary radius, and R(cid:63) is the stellar radius (e.g. Seager & Sas- selov 2000; Brown 2001; Hubbard et al. 2001). Because the scale height H is inversely proportional to the mean molecular weight µ of the atmosphere, the amplitude of features seen in the planet’s transmission spectrum places strong constraints on the possible values of µ and, in particular, the hydrogen/helium content of the atmo- sphere (Miller-Ricci et al. 2009). 2 Berta et al. Indeed, detailed radiative transfer simulations of GJ1214b’s atmosphere (Miller-Ricci & Fortney 2010) show that a solar composition, H2 -dominated atmo- sphere (µ = 2.4) would show depth variations of roughly 0.1% between 0.6 and 10 µm, while the features in an H2O-dominated atmosphere (µ = 18) would be an order of magnitude smaller. While the latter of these is likely too small to detect directly with current instruments, the former is at a level that has regularly been measured with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) in the transmission spectra of hot Jupiters (e.g. Charbonneau et al. 2002; Pont et al. 2008; Sing et al. 2011). Spectroscopic observations by Bean et al. (2010) with the Very Large Telescope found the transmission spec- trum of GJ1214b to be featureless between 0.78-1.0 µm, down to an amplitude that would rule out cloud-free H2 - rich atmospheric models. Broadband Spizer Space Tele- scope photometric transit measurements at 3.6 and 4.5 µm by D´esert et al. (2011a) showed a flat spectrum con- sistent with Bean et al. (2010), as did high-resolution spectroscopy with NIRSPEC between 2.0 and 2.4 µm by Crossfield et al. (2011). Intriguingly, the transit depth in K -band (2.2 µm) was measured from CFHT by Croll et al. (2011) to be 0.1% deeper than at other wavelengths, which would imply a H2 -rich atmosphere, in apparent contradiction to the other studies. These seemingly incongruous observations could po- tentially be brought into agreement if GJ1214b’s at- mosphere were H2 -rich but significantly depleted in CH4 (Crossfield et al. 2011; Miller-Ricci Kempton et al. 2011). In such a scenario, the molecular features that remain (predominantly H2O) would fit the CFHT mea- surement, but be unseen by the NIRSPEC and Spitzer observations. Explaining the flat VLT spectrum in this context would then require a broadband haze to smooth the spectrum at shorter wavelengths (see Miller-Ricci Kempton et al. 2011). New observations by Bean et al. (2011) covering 0.6-0.85 µm and 2.0-2.3 µm were again consistent with a flat spectrum, but they still could not directly speak to this possibility of a methane-depleted, H2 -rich atmosphere with optically scattering hazes. Here, we present a new transmission spectrum of GJ1214b spanning 1.1 to 1.7 µm, using the infrared slit- less spectroscopy mode on the newly installed Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) aboard the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Our WFC3 observations directly probe the pre- dicted strong 1.15 and 1.4 µm water absorption features in GJ1214b’s atmosphere (Miller-Ricci & Fortney 2010) and provide a stringent constraint on the H2 content of GJ1214b’s atmosphere that is robust to non-equilibrium methane abundances and hence a definite test of the CH4 -depleted hypothesis. The features probed by WFC3 are the same features that define the J and H band win- dows in the telluric spectrum, and cannot be observed from the ground. Because this is the first published analysis of WFC3 ob- servations of a transiting exoplanet, we include a detailed discussion of the performance of WFC3 in this observa- tional regime and the systematic effects that are inherent to the instrument. Recent work on WFC3’s predecessor NICMOS (Burke et al. 2010; Gibson et al. 2011a) has highlighted the importance of characterizing instrumen- tal systematics when interpreting exoplanet results from HST observations. Figure 1. A 512x100 pixel cutout of a typical WFC3 G141 grism exposure of the star GJ1214. The 0th and 1st order spectra are labeled, and the start of the 2nd order spectrum is visible on the right. The location of the star in the direct images (not shown here) is marked with a circle. This paper is organized as follows: we describe our ob- servations in §2, our method for extracting spectropho- tometric light curves from them in §3, and our analy- sis of these light curves in §4. We present the resulting transmission spectrum and discuss its implications for GJ1214b’s composition in §5, and conclude in §6. 2. OBSERVATIONS We observed three transits of GJ1214b on UT 2010 October 8, 2011 March 28, and 2011 July 23 with the G141 grism on WFC3’s infrared channel (HST Proposal #GO-12251, P.I. = Z. Berta), obtaining simultaneous multiwavelength spectrophotometry of each transit be- tween 1.1 and 1.7 µm. WFC3’s IR channel consists of a 1024 × 1024 pixel Teledyne HgCdTe detector with a 1.7 µm cutoff that can be paired with any of 15 filters or 2 low-resolution grisms (Dressel et al. 2010). Each expo- sure is compiled from multiple non-destructive readouts and can consist of either the full array or a concentric, smaller subarray. Each visit consisted of four 96 minute long HST orbits, each containing 45 minute gaps due to Earth occulta- tions. Instrumental overheads between the occultations are dominated by serial downloads of the WFC3 image buffer, during which all science images are transferred to the telescope’s solid state recorder. This buffer can hold only two 16-readout, full-frame IR exposures before re- quiring a download, which takes 6 minutes. Exposures cannot be started nor stopped during a buffer download, so parallel buffer downloads are impossible for short ex- posures. Sub ject to these constraints and the possible readout sequences, we maximized the number of photons detected per orbit while avoiding saturation by gathering expo- sures using the 512 × 512 subarray with the RAPID NSAMP=7 readout sequence, for an effective integration time of 5.971 seconds per exposure. With this setting, four 12-exposure batches, separated by buffer downloads, were gathered per orbit resulting in an integration effi- ciency of 10%. Although the brightest pixel in the 1st or- der spectrum reaches 78% of saturation during this expo- sure time, the WFC3’s multiple non-destructive readouts enable the flux within each pixel to be estimated before the onset of significant near-saturation nonlinearities. A sub-region of a typical G141 grism image of GJ1214 is shown in Fig. 1. The 512 × 512 subarray allows both the 0th and 1st order spectra to be recorded, and the 1st order spectrum to fall entirely within a single ampli- fier quadrant of the detector. The 1st order spectrum spans 150 pixels with a dispersion in the x-direction of 4.65 nm/pixel and a spatial full-width half maximum in the y -direction of 1.7 pixels (0.2”). The 0th order spec- trum is slightly dispersed by the grism’s prism but is nearly a point source. Other stars are present in the 1st order0th orderdirectimageWFC3 Observations of GJ1214b 3 that calwf3 does not apply flat-field corrections when calibrating grism images; proper wavelength-dependent flat-fielding for slitless spectroscopy requires wavelength- calibrating individual sources and calwf3 does not per- form this task. 3.1. Interpolating over Cosmic Rays calwf3 identifies cosmic rays that appear partway through an exposure by looking for deviations from a linear accumulation of charge among the non-destructive readouts, but it can not identify cosmic rays that appear between the zeroth and first readout. We supplement calwf3’s cosmic ray identifications by also flagging any pixel in an individual exposure that is > 6σ above the median of that pixel’s value in all other exposures as a cosmic ray. Through all three visits (576 exposures), a total of 88 cosmic rays were identified within the extrac- tion box for the 1st order spectra. For each exposure, we spatially interpolate over cos- mic rays. Near the 1st order spectrum, the pixel-to-pixel gradient of the point spread function (PSF) is typically much shallower along the dispersion direction than per- pendicular to it, so we use only horizontally adjacent pixels when interpolating to avoid errors in modeling the sharp cross-dispersion falloff. 3.2. Identifying Continuously Bad Pixels We also mask any pixels that are identified as “bad detector pixels” (DQ=4), “unstable response” (DQ=32), “bad or uncertain flat value” (DQ=512). We found that only these DQ flags affected the photometry in a pixel by more than 1σ . Other flags may have influenced the pixel photometry, but did so below the level of the pho- ton noise. In the second visit, we also identified one col- umn of the detector (x = 625 in physical pixels9 ) whose light curve exhibited a dramatically different systematic variation than did light curves from any of the other columns. This column was coincident with an unusually low-sensitivity feature in the flat-field, and we hypothe- size that the flat-field is more uncertain in this column than in neighboring columns. We masked all pixels in that column as bad. We opt not to interpolate over these continuously bad pixels. Because they remained flagged throughout the duration of each visit, we simply give these pixels zero weight when extracting 1D spectra from the images. This allows us to keep track of the actual number of photons recorded in each exposure so we can better assess our predicted photometric uncertainties. 3.3. Background Estimation In addition to the target, WFC3 also detects light from the diffuse sky background, which comes predominantly from zodiacal light and Earth-shine, and must be sub- tracted. We draw conservative masks around all sources that are visible in each visit’s median image, including GJ1214 and its electronics cross-talk artifact (see Viana & Baggett 2010). We exclude these pixels, as well as all 9 For ease of comparison with future WFC3 analyses, through- out this paper we quote all pixel positions in physical units as interpreted by SAOImage DS9, where the bottom left pixel of a full-frame array would be (x, y) = (1,1). Figure 2. The mean out-of-transit extracted spectrum of GJ1214 (black line) from all three HST visits, shown before (top) and af- ter (bottom) flux calibration. Individual extracted spectra from each visit are shown with their 1σ uncertainties (color error bars). For comparison, the integrated flux from the PHOENIX model at- mosphere used to calculate the stellar limb darkening (see §4.2) is shown (gray lines) offset for clarity and binned to the WFC3 pixel scale (gray circles). subarray’s 68(cid:48) × 61(cid:48) field of view, but are too faint to provide useful diagnostics of systematic trends that may exist in the data. For wavelength calibration, we gath- ered direct images in the F130N narrow-band filter; the direct images’ position relative to the grism images is also shown in Fig. 1. To avoid systematics from the detector flat-fields that have a quoted precision no better than 0.5% (Pirzkal et al. 2011), the telescope was not dithered during any of the observations. We note that a technique called “spatial scanning” has been proposed to decrease the overheads for bright targets with WFC3, where the tele- scope nods during an exposure to smear the light along the cross-dispersion direction, thus increasing the time to saturation (McCullough & MacKenty 2011). We did not use this mode of observation as it was not yet tested at the time our program was initiated. 3. DATA REDUCTION The Python/PyRAF software package aXe was devel- oped to extract spectra from slitless grism observations with WFC3 and other Hubble instruments (Kummel et al. 2009), but it is optimized for extracting large num- bers of spectra from full frame dithered grism images. To produce relative spectrophotometric measurements of our single bright source, we opted to create our own ex- traction pipeline that prioritizes precision in the time domain. We outline the extraction procedure below. Through the extraction, we use calibrated 2- dimensional images, the “flt” outputs from WFC3’s calwf3 pipeline. For each exposure, calwf3 performs the following steps: flag detector pixels with the appropriate data quality (DQ) warnings, estimate and remove bias drifts using the reference pixels, subtract dark current, determine count rates and identify cosmic rays by fitting a slope to the non-destructive reads, correct for photo- metric non-linearity (properly accounting for the signal accumulation before the initial “zeroth” read), and apply gain calibration. The resulting images are measured in e− s−1 and contain per pixel uncertainty estimates based on a detector model (Kim Quijano et al. 2009). We note 4 Berta et al. a simple mean of the unmasked pixels; the results were unchanged. 3.4. Inter-pixel Capacitance The normal calibration pipeline does not correct for the inter-pixel capacitance (IPC) effect, which effectively couples the flux recorded in adjacent pixels at about the 1% level (McCullough 2008). We correct this ef- fect with a linear deconvolution algorithm (McCullough 2008; Hilbert & McCullough 2011), although we find it makes little difference to the final results. 3.5. Extracting the Zeroth Order Image The 0th order image can act as a diagnostic for tracking changes in the telescope pointing and in the shape of the instrumental PSF. We select a 10 × 10 pixel box around the 0th order image and fit a 2D Gaussian to it with the x position, y position, size in the x direction, size in the y direction, and total flux allowed to vary (5 parameters). Time series of the 0th order x and y positions, sizes in both directions, and total flux are shown for all three visits in Fig. 3 (panels c-g). Thanks to the dispersion by the grism’s prism, the Gaussian is typically 20% wider in the x direction than in the y direction. Even though the throughput of the 0th order image is a factor of 60 lower than the 1st order spectrum, the transit of GJ1214b is readily apparent in the 0th -order flux time series. 3.6. Extracting the First Order Spectrum To extract the first order spectra, we first determine the position of GJ1214 in the direct image, which serves as a reference position for defining the trace and wave- length calibration of the 1st order spectrum. We adopt the mean position GJ1214 in all of the direct images as the reference position, which we measure using the same method as in extracting the 0th order image in §3.5. The measured (x, y) reference positions for the first, second, and third visits are (498.0, 527.5), (498.6, 531.1), and (498.9, 527.1) in physical pixels. Once the reference pixel for a visit is known, we use the coefficients stored in the WFC3/G141 aXe configu- ration file10 (Kuntschner et al. 2009), to determine the geometry of the 1st order trace and cut out a 30 pixel tall extraction box centered on the trace. Within this extraction box, we use the wavelength calibration coeffi- cients to determine the average wavelength of light that will be illuminating each pixel. We treat all pixels in the same column as having the same effective wavelength; given the spectrum’s 0.5◦ tilt from to the x axis, errors introduced by this simplification are negligible. Kuntschner et al. (2008) used flat-fields taken through all narrow-band filters available on WFC3/IR to con- struct a flat-field “cube” where each pixel contains 4 polynomial coefficients that describe its sensitivity as a function of wavelength11 . We use this flat-field cube to construct a color-dependent flat based on our estimate of the effective wavelength illuminating each pixel, and di- vide each exposure by it. WFC3 wavelength calibration and flat-fielding is described in detail in the aXe manual (Kummel et al. 2010). 10 The aXe configuration file WFC3.IR.G141.V2.0.conf is avail- able through http://www.stsci.edu/hst/wfc3/ 11 WFC3.IR.G141.flat.2.fits, through the same URL Figure 3. Extracted properties of the 0th and 1st order spectra as a function of time, including (a) the summed 1st order photometric light curves; (b) the estimated sky background level; (c-g) the total flux, x and y position (measured relative to the reference pixel), and Gaussian widths in the x and y directions of the 0th order image; and (h-j) the y offset, cross-dispersion width, and slope of the 1st order spectrum. All three visits are shown and are denoted by the color of the symbols. The 45 minute gaps in each time series are due to Earth occultations, the 6 minute gaps are due to the WFC3 buffer downloads. pixels that have any DQ warning flagged. Then, to es- timate the sky background in each exposure, we scale a master WFC3 grism sky image (Kummel et al. 2011) to match the remaining 70-80% of the pixels in each expo- sure and subtract it. We find typical background levels of 1 − 3 e− s−1 pixel−1 , that vary smoothly within or- bits and throughout visits as shown in Fig. 3 (panel b). As a test, we also estimated the background level from WFC3 Observations of GJ1214b 5 To calculate 1D spectra from the flat-fielded images, we sum all the unmasked pixels within the extraction box over the y -axis. To estimate the uncertainty in each spectral channel, we first construct a per-pixel uncer- tainty model that includes photon noise from the source and sky as well as 22 e− of read noise, and sum these uncertainties, in quadrature, over the y -axis. We do not use the calwf3-estimated uncertainties; they include a term propagated from the uncertainty in the nonlinearity correction that, while appropriate for absolute photome- try, would not be appropriate for relative photometry. In each exposure, there are typically 1.2 × 105 e− per single- pixel spectral channel and a total of 1.5 × 107 e− in the entire spectrum. Fig. 3 (panel a) shows the extracted spectra summed over all wavelengths as a function of time, the “white” light curve. For diagnostics’ sake, we also measure the geometri- cal properties of the 1st order spectra in each exposure. We fit 1D Gaussians the cross-dispersion profile in each column of the spectrum and take the median Gaussian width among all the columns as a measurement of the PSF’s width. We fit a line to the location of the Gaus- sian peaks in all the columns, taking the intercept and the slope of that line as an estimate of the y -offset and tilt of the spectrum on the detector. Time series of these parameters are shown in Fig. 3 (panels h-j). 3.7. Flux Calibration For the sake of display purposes only (see Fig. 2), we flux calibrate each visit’s median, extracted, 1D spec- trum. Here we have interpolated over all bad pixels within each visit (contrary to the discussion in the §3.2), and plotted the weighted mean over all three visits. The calibration uncertainty for the G141 sensitivity curve (Kuntschner et al. 2011) is quoted to be 1%. 3.8. Times of Observations For each exposure, we extract the EXPSTART keyword from the science header, which is the Modified Julian Date at the start of the exposure. We correct this to the mid-exposure time using the EXPTIME keyword, and convert it to the Barycentric Julian Date in the Barycen- tric Dynamical Time standard using the code provided by Eastman et al. (2010). 4. ANALYSIS In this section we describe our method for estimating parameter uncertainties (§4.1) and our strategy for mod- eling GJ1214’s stellar limb darkening (§4.2). Then, af- ter identifying the dominant systematics in WFC3 light curves (§4.3) and describing a method to correct them (§4.4), we present our fits to the light curves, both summed over wavelength (§4.5) and spectroscopically re- solved (§4.6). We also present a fruitless search for tran- siting satellite companions to GJ1214b (§4.7). 4.1. Estimating Parameter Distributions Throughout our analysis, we fit different WFC3 light curves with models that have different sets of parame- ters, and draw conclusions from the inferred probability distributions of those parameters; this section describes our method for characterizing the posterior probability distribution for a set of parameters within a given model. = (1) We use a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm to explore the posterior probability density function (PDF) of the model parameters. This Bayesian technique allows us to sample from (and thus infer the shape of ) the prob- ability distribution of a model’s parameters given both our data and our prior knowledge about the parameters (for reviews, see Ford 2005; Gregory 2005; Hogg et al. 2010). Briefly, the algorithm starts a chain with an ini- tial set of parameters (Mj=0 ) and generates a trial set of parameters (M(cid:48) j+1 ) by perturbing the previous set. The ratio of posterior probability between the two parameter sets, given the data D, is then calculated as j+1 D) P (DM(cid:48) P (M(cid:48) × P (M(cid:48) j+1 ) j+1 ) P (DMj ) P (Mj D) P (Mj ) where the first term (the “likelihood”) accounts for the information that our data provide about the parameters and the second term (the “prior”) specifies our externally conceived knowledge about the parameters. If a random number drawn from a uniform distribution between 0 and 1 is less than this probability ratio, then Mj+1 is set to M(cid:48) j+1 ; if not, then Mj+1 reverts to Mj . The process is iterated until j is large, and the resulting chain of parameter sets is a fair sample from the posterior PDF and can be used to estimate confidence intervals for each parameter. To calculate the likelihood term in Eq. 1, we assume that each of the N flux values di is drawn from a uncorre- lated Gaussian distribution centered on the model value mi with a standard deviation of sσi , where σi is the the- oretical uncertainty for the flux measurement based on the detector model and photon statistics and s is a pho- tometric uncertainty rescaling parameter. Calculation of the ratio in Eq. 1 is best done in logarithmic space for numerical stability, so we write the likelihood as ln P (DM) = −N ln s − 1 2s2 χ2 + constant (cid:18) di − mi (cid:19)2 N(cid:88) σi i=1 where χ2 = (2) (3) and we have only explicitly displayed terms that depend on the model parameters. Including s as a model pa- rameter is akin to rescaling the uncertainties by exter- nally modifying σi to achieve a reduced χ2 of unity, but enables the MCMC to fit for and marginalize over this rescaling automatically. Unless otherwise stated for spe- cific parameters, we use non-informative (uniform) priors for the second term in Eq. 1. We use a Jeffreys prior on s (uniform in ln s) which is the least informative, although the results are practically indistinguishable from prior uniform in s. When generating each new trial parameter set M(cid:48) j+1 , we follow Dunkley et al. (2005) and perturb every pa- rameter at once, drawing the parameter jumps from a multivariate Gaussian with a covariance matrix that ap- proximates that of the parameter distribution. Doing so allows the MCMC to move easily along the dominant lin- ear correlations in parameter PDF, and greatly increases the efficiency of the algorithm. While this procedure may 6 Berta et al. Table 1 White Light Curves from WFC3/G141 Timea (BJDTDB ) 2455478.439980 2455478.440270 2455478.440559 2455478.440848 2455478.441138 Relative Fluxb Uncertainty 0.99381 0.99713 0.99787 0.99958 0.99989 0.00031 0.00031 0.00031 0.00032 0.00032 Sky (e− /s) 1.9546 1.9938 1.9718 1.8808 1.9379 0th -Xc (pix) 0th -Yc (pix) 0th -Ad (pix) 0th -Bd (pix) 1st -Yc (pix) -187.830 -187.839 -187.846 -187.827 -187.844 ... -0.474 -0.481 -0.484 -0.490 -0.490 0.790 0.792 0.789 0.792 0.785 0.613 0.616 0.615 0.614 0.612 -0.075 -0.082 -0.076 -0.087 -0.085 1st -Bd (pix) 0.7484 0.7490 0.7486 0.7476 0.7492 1st -Slopee Visit (pix/pix) 0.00921 0.00925 0.00914 0.00917 0.00921 1 1 1 1 1 Note. — This table is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the Astrophysical Journal. A portion is shown here for guidance concerning its form and content. a Mid-exposure time. b Normalized to the median flux level of the out-of-transit observations in each visit. c Position measured relative to the Gaussian center of each visit’s direct image. d Gaussian width of the 0th or 1st order spectra in the horizontal (A) or vertical (B) direction. e Slope of the 1st order spectrum. seem circular (if we knew the covariance matrix of the pa- rameter distribution, why would we need to perform the MCMC?), the covariance matrix we use to generate trial parameters could be a very rough approximation to the true shape of the parameter PDF but still dramatically decrease the computation time necessary for the MCMC. To obtain an initial guess for parameters (Mj=0 ), we use the MPFIT implementation (Markwardt 2009) of the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) method to maximize ln P (MD). This would be identical to minimizing χ2 in the case of flat priors, but it can also include con- straints from more informative priors. The LM fit also provides an estimate of the covariance matrix of the pa- rameters, which is a linearization of the probability space near the best-fit. We use this covariance matrix esti- mate for generating trial parameters in the MCMC, and with it, achieve parameter acceptance rates of 10-40% throughout the following sections. As expected, when fitting models with flat priors and linear or nearly-linear parameters (where the PDF should well-described by a multivariate Gaussian), the LM covariance matrix is identical to that ultimately obtained from the MCMC (see Sivia 1996, for further discussion). MCMC chains are run until they contain 1.25 × 105 points. The first 1/5 of the points are ignored as “burn- in”, leaving 1×105 for parameter estimation. Correlation lengths for the parameters in the MCMC chains are indi- cated throughout the text; they are typically of order 10 points. A chain with such a correlation length effectively contains 1 × 105/10 = 1 × 104 independent realizations of the posterior PDF. We quote confidence intervals that exclude the upper and lower 16% of the marginalized dis- tribution for each parameter (i.e. the parameter’s central 68% confidence interval), using all 1×105 points in each chain. 4.2. Modeling Stel lar Limb Darkening Accurate modeling of the WFC3 integrated and spec- troscopic transit light curves requires careful consid- eration of the stellar limb-darkening (LD) behavior. GJ1214b’s M4.5V stellar host is so cool that it exhibits weak absorption features due to molecular H2O. Because inferences of the planet’s apparent radii from transit light curves depend strongly on the star’s limb-darkening, which is clearly influenced by H2O as an opacity source, inaccurate treatment of limb-darkening could potentially introduce spurious H2O features into the transmission spectrum. If they were sufficiently precise, transit light curves alone could simultaneously constrain both the star’s mul- tiwavelength limb-darkening behavior and the planet’s multiwavelength radii (e.g. Knutson et al. 2007b). For less precise light curves, it is common practice to fix the limb-darkening to a theoretically calculated law, even if this may underestimate the uncertainty in the planetary parameters (see Burke et al. 2007; Southworth 2008). Given the quality of our data, we adopt an intermediate solution where we allow the limb-darkening parameters to vary in our fits, but with a Gaussian prior centered on the theoretical values (e.g. Bean et al. 2010). We model the star GJ1214’s limb-darkening behav- ior with a spherically symmetric PHOENIX atmosphere (Hauschildt et al. 1999), assuming stellar parameters of Teff = 3026K , log g = 5, and [M/H] = 0 (Charbonneau et al. 2009). As shown in Fig. 2, the integrated flux from the PHOENIX model is in good qualitative agree- ment with the low-resolution, calibrated WFC3 stellar spectrum of GJ1214. From this model, we calculate photon-weighted average intensity profiles for the inte- grated spectrum and for each of the individual wave- length bins, using the WFC3 grism sensitivity curve and the PHOENIX model to estimate the photon counts. In the spherical geometry of the PHOENIX atmospheres the characterization of the actual limb (defined as µ = 0, see below) is not straightforward, as the model extends beyond the photosphere into the optically thin outer at- mosphere. The result is an approximately exponentially declining intensity profile from the outermost layers, that Claret & Hauschildt (2003) found not to be easily repro- duced by standard limb darkening laws for plane-parallel atmospheres. These authors suggest the use of “quasi- spherical” models by ignoring the outer region. In an extension of this concept, we set the outer surface of the star to be where the intensity drops to e−1 of the central intensity, and measure µ = cos θ (where θ is the emission angle relative to the line of sight) relative to that outer radius. We derive coefficients for a square-root limb-darkening WFC3 Observations of GJ1214b 7 sures between buffer downloads. To the eye, the ramps are very repeatable; the flux at the end of all batches asymptotes to nearly the same level. The amplitude of the ramp is 0.4% from start to finish for most batches, except for the first batch of each orbit, where the ramp is somewhat less pronounced. These ramps are reminiscent of those seen in high- cadence Spitzer light curves at 8 and 16 µm (e.g. Dem- ing et al. 2006; Knutson et al. 2007a; Charbonneau et al. 2008) which Agol et al. (2010) recently proposed may be due to “charge trapping” within the detector pixels. In their toy model, charge traps within each pixel be- come filled throughout an exposure and later release the trapped charge on a finite timescale, thereby increasing the pixel’s dark current in subsequent exposures. The model leads to exponential ramps when observing bright sources as the excess dark current increases sharply at first but slows its increase as the population of charge traps begins to approach steady state. We note this model also leads to after-images following strong expo- sures, i.e., persistence. WFC3 has been known since its initial ground-testing to exhibit strong persistence behavior (McCullough & Deustua 2008; Long et al. 2010). Smith et al. (2008a) have proposed that persistence in 1.7 µm cutoff HgCdTe detectors like WFC3 is likely related to charge trapping. Measurements (McCullough & Deustua 2008) indicate that WFC3’s persistence may be of the right order of magnitude (on < 1 minute timescales) to supply the roughly 50 e− s−1 pixel−1 in the brightest pixels that would be necessary to explain the observed several mil- limagnitude ramp, although persistence levels and de- cay timescales can depend in complicated ways on the strength of previous exposures (see Smith et al. 2008b). We were aware of this persistence issue before our ob- servations and made an effort to control its effect on our light curves. When we planned the timing of the expo- sures, we attempted to make the illumination history of each pixel as consistent as possible from batch to batch and orbit to orbit. In practice, this means we gathered more direct images than necessary for wavelength cali- bration to delay some of the grism exposures. Whether or not the ramps are caused by the charge trapping mechanism, they are definitely dependent on the illumination that a pixel receives. To demonstrate this, we construct light curves for each individual pixel over the duration of every out-of-transit 12-exposure batch that follows a buffer download and normalize each of these pixel light curves to the first exposure in the batch. Fig. 4 shows the normalized pixel light curves, grouped by their mean recorded fluence. Because it takes a finite time to read the subarray (0.8 seconds) and reset the full array (2.9 seconds), we note that each exposure actually collects 60% more electrons than indicated by these nominal, recorded fluences (see Long et al. 2011). The appearance of the ramp clearly becomes more pro- nounced for pixels that are more strongly exposed. Buried beneath the ramp features, the summed light curve exhibits subtler trends that appear mostly as orbit- long or visit-long slopes with a peak-to-peak variation of about 0.05%. These are perhaps caused by slow drifts in pointing and focus (telescope “breathing”) interacting with sensitivity variations across the detector that are Figure 4. Single-pixel light curves within each 12-exposure batch following a buffer download (gray points), shown for different mean pixel illuminations. Pixel light curves have been normalized to the first exposure within each batch, and plotted with small random horizontal offsets for clarity. Only data from the first HST visit, which exhibited the smallest pointing drifts (see Fig. 3), are shown. Error bars show the mean and its standard error for each time point and each illumination. An exponential ramp begins is present in pixels with a mean recorded fluence greater than 30,000 and 40,000 e− (50% of the detector full well). Note, the nominal fluences quoted here do not include charge accumulated during detector flushing and initial readout (see text). law for each of these average intensity profiles using least- squares fitting. In this law, the intensity relative to the center of the star is given by = 1 − c(1 − µ) − d(1 − √ (4) I (µ) I (1) µ), where c and d are the two coefficients of the fit. We chose a square-root law over the popular quadratic law because it gave noticeably better approximations to the PHOENIX intensity profiles, while still having few enough free parameters that they can be partially inferred from the data. Indeed, van Hamme (1993) found the square- root law to be generally preferable to other 2-parameter limb-darkening laws for late-type stars in the near-IR. The square-root law matches the theoretical intensity profile nearly as well as the full nonlinear 4-parameter law introduced by Claret (2000) for the models we use here. 4.3. Light Curve Systematics The summed light curve shown in Fig. 3 (panel a) ex- hibits non-astrophysical systematic trends. The most ob- vious of these are the sharply rising but quickly saturat- ing “ramp”-like features within each batch of 12 expo- 8 Berta et al. not perfectly corrected by the flat field. 4.4. Correcting for Systematics Fortunately, these systematics are extremely repeat- able between orbits within a visit; we harness this fact when correcting for them. We divide the in-transit orbit of any photometric timeseries, either the white light curve or one of the spectroscopically resolved light curves, by a systematics correction template constructed from the two good out-of-transit orbits. This template is simply the weighted average of the fluxes in the out-of- transit orbits, evaluated at each exposure within an orbit. It encodes both variations in the effective sensitivity of the detector within an orbit and the mean out-of-transit flux level. When performing the division, we propagate the tem- of (cid:112)1 + 1/2 = 1.22. This factor, although it may seem plate uncertainty into the photometric uncertainty for each exposure, which typically increases it by a factor like an undesired degradation of the photometric preci- sion, would inevitably propagate into measurements of the transit depth whether we performed this correction or not, since Rp/R(cid:63) is always measured relative to the out-of-transit flux, which must at some point be inferred from the data. Throughout to this pro- refer this work, we cess of dividing by the out-of-transit orbits as the divide-oot method. Because each point in the sin- gle in-transit orbit is equally spaced in time between the two out-of-transit exposures being used to correct it, the divide-oot method also naturally removes the 0.05% visit-long slope seen in the raw photometry. As we show in §4.5, when applied to the white light curves, the divide-oot treatment produces uncorrelated Gaus- sian residuals that have a scatter consistent with the pre- dicted photon uncertainties. Unlike decorrelation techniques that have often been used to correct systematics in HST light curves, the divide-oot method does not require knowing the re- lationship between measured photometry and the phys- ical state of the camera. It does, however, strictly re- quire the systematics to repeat over multiple orbits. The divide-oot method would not work if the changes in the position, shape, and rotational angle of the 1st -order spectrum were not repeated in the other orbits in a visit or if the cadence of the illumination were not nearly iden- tical across orbits. In such cases, the Gaussian process method proposed by Gibson et al. (2011b) may be a use- ful alternative, and one that would appropriately account for the uncertainty involved in the systematics correc- tion. 4.5. White Light Curve Fits Although the main scientific result of this paper is de- rived from the spectroscopic light curves presented in §4.6, we also analyze the light curve summed over all wavelengths between 1.1 and 1.7 µm. We use these white light curves to confirm the general system prop- erties found in previous studies and quantitatively inves- tigate the instrumental systematics. We fit an analytic, limb-darkened transit light curve model (Mandel & Agol 2002) to the divide-oot- corrected white light curves. Only the in-transit orbits were fit; after the divide-oot correction, the two out- of-transit orbits contain no further information. Also, because the in-transit orbit’s flux has already been nor- malized, we fix the out-of-transit flux level to unity in all the fits. Throughout, we fix the planet’s pe- riod to P = 1.58040481 days and mid-transit time to Tc = 2454966.525123 BJDTDB (Bean et al. 2011), the orbital eccentricity to e = 0, and the stellar mass to 0.157M(cid:12) (Charbonneau et al. 2009). 4.5.1. Combined White Light Curve First, we combine the three visits into a single light curve, as shown in Fig. 5, and fit for the following pa- rameters: the planet-to-star radius ratio (Rp/R(cid:63) ), the total transit duration between first and fourth contact (t14 ), the stellar radius (R(cid:63) ), and the two coefficients c and d of the square-root limb-darkening law12 . Previous studies have found no significant transit timing variations for the GJ1214b system (Charbonneau et al. 2009; Sada et al. 2010; Bean et al. 2010; Carter et al. 2011; D´esert et al. 2011a; Kundurthy et al. 2011; Berta et al. 2011; Croll et al. 2011), so we fix the time of mid-transit for each visit to be that predicted by the linear ephemeris. As in Burke et al. (2007), we use the parameters t14 and R(cid:63) to ensure quick convergence of the MCMC be- cause correlations among these parameters are more lin- ear than for the commonly fit impact parameter (b) and scaled semi-ma jor axis (a/R(cid:63) ). Because nonlinear trans- formations between parameter pairs will deform the hy- pervolume of parameter space, we include a Jacobian term in the priors in Eq. 1 to ensure uniform priors for the physical parameters Rp , R(cid:63) , and i (see Burke et al. 2007; Carter et al. 2008, for detailed discussions). For the combined light curves, the influence of this term is practically negligible, but we include it for completeness. In the MCMC chains described in this section, all pa- rameters have correlation lengths of 6-13 points. Initially, we perform the fit with limb-darkening coeffi- cients c and d without any priors from the PHOENIX atmo- sphere model, enforcing only that 0 < c + d < 1, which ensures that the star is brighter at its center (µ = 1) than at its limb (µ = 0). Interestingly, the quantity (c/3 + d/5), which sets the integral of I (µ) over the stellar surface, defines the line along which c and d are most strongly correlated in the MCMC samples (see also Irwin et al. 2011). For quadratic limb-darkening, the commonly quoted 2u1 + u2 combination (Holman et al. 2006) has the same physical meaning. The integral of I (µ) can be thought of as the increase in the central transit depth over that for a constant-intensity stellar disk, so it makes sense that it is well-constrained for nearly equatorial transiting systems like GJ1214b. Plan- ets with higher impact parameters do not sample the full range of 0 < µ < 1 during transit, leading to correspond- ingly weaker limb-darkening constraints that can be de- rived from their light curves (see Knutson et al. 2011). We quote confidence intervals for the linear combination (c/3 + d/5) and one orthogonal to it in Table 2, along with rest of the parameters. Heartened by finding that when they are allowed to vary freely, our inferred white-light limb-darkening coef- 12 The square-root law is a special case of the 4-parameter law and straightforward to include in the Mandel & Agol (2002) model. WFC3 Observations of GJ1214b 9 Figure 5. The white light curve of GJ1214b’s transits before (top panels) and after (midd le panels) removing the instrumental systematics using the divide-oot (left) and model-ramp (right, with offsets for clarity) methods described in §4.4 and §4.5.4. A transit model that was fit to the divide-oot-corrected light curve, constrained to the values of a/R(cid:63) and b used by Bean et al. (2010), is shown (gray lines), along with residuals from this model (bottom panels). In the left panels, the out-of-transit orbits are not shown after the correction has been applied, because they contain no further information. ficients agree to 1σ to those derived using the PHOENIX stellar model, we perform a second fit that includes the PHOENIX models as informative priors. For this prior, we say P (M) in Eq. 1 is proportional to a Gaussian with (c/3 + d/5) = 0.0892 ± 0.018 and (c/5 − d/3) = −0.431 ± 0.032, which is centered on the PHOENIX model. To set the 1σ widths of these priors, we start by vary- ing the effective temperature of the star in the PHOENIX model by its 130K uncertainty in either direction, and then double the width of the prior beyond this, to ac- count for potential systematic uncertainties in the atmo- sphere model. The results from the fit with these LD priors are shown in Table 2. The photometric noise rescaling parameter s is within 10% of unity, implying that the 376 ppm achieved scat- ter in the combined white light curve can be quite well- explained from the known sources of uncertainty in the measurements, predominantly photon noise from the star. As shown in Fig. 6, for the divide-oot-corrected light curves, the autocorrelation function (ACF) of the residuals shows no evidence for time-correlated noise. Likewise, the scatter in binned divide-oot residuals de- creases as the square-root of the number of points in a bin, as expected for uncorrelated Gaussian noise. If there are uncorrected systematic effects remaining in the data, they are below the level of the photon noise over the time-scales of interest here. 4.5.2. Individual White Light Curves To test for possible differences among our WFC3 vis- its, we fit each of the three divide-oot-corrected white light curves individually. In addition to Rp/R(cid:63) , t14 , and R(cid:63) , we also allow ∆Tc (the deviation of each visit’s mid- transit time from the linear ephemeris) to vary freely. We allow c and d to vary, but enforce the same PHOENIX- derived priors described in §4.5.1. Table 3 shows the results, which are consistent with each other and with other observations (Charbonneau et al. 2009; Bean et al. 2010; Carter et al. 2011; Kun- Figure 6. For the transit model in Fig. 5 and both types of sys- tematics treatments, the autocorrelation function of the residuals (ACF; top) and the scatter in binned residuals as a function of bin size (bottom). The residuals from the combined light curve are shown (black points), as well as the individual visits (colorful √ points). The expectations from uncorrelated Gaussian noise (0 in the top, ∝ 1/ N in the bottom) are overplotted (dashed lines). durthy et al. 2011; Berta et al. 2011). The three mea- sured ∆Tc ’s show no evidence for transit timing varia- tions. The uncertainties for the parameters t14 , R(cid:63) , and ∆Tc are noticeably largest in the first visit; this is most likely because the first visit does not directly measure the timing of either 1st or 4th contact, on which these parameters strongly depend. Additionally, whereas the correlation lengths in the MCMC chains for these pa- rameters in the two visits that do measure 1st/4th con- tact and for Rp/R(cid:63) , c, and d in all three visits are small (10-30 points), the correlation lengths for t14 , R(cid:63) , and ∆Tc in the first visit are very large (300-400 points), in- dicating these weakly constrained parameters are poorly approximated by the MPFIT-derived covariance matrix. On account of the large correlation lengths for these pa- rameters, we ran the MCMC for the first visit with a factor of 10 more points. In each of the three visits, the 10 Berta et al. Table 2 Transit Parameters Inferred from the Combined White Light Curve Parameter t14 (days) R(cid:63) (R(cid:12) ) a/R(cid:63) i (◦ ) b Rp /R(cid:63) c/3 + d/5 c/5 − d/3 b predicted RMS achieved RMS s No LD Prior 0.03624 ± 0.00013 0.2014+0.0038 −0.0025 15.30+0.19−0.29 89.3 ± 0.4 0.18+0.09−0.11 0.1158+0.0007 −0.0006 0.096 ± 0.008 −0.52+0.22−0.14 337 ppm 373 ppm 1.12 ± 0.07 LD Priora 0.03620 ± 0.00012 0.201+0.004 −0.003 15.31+0.21−0.29 89.3+0.4−0.3 0.19+0.08−0.11 0.1160 ± 0.0005 0.095 ± 0.007 −0.433 ± 0.032 337 ppm 376 ppm 1.12 ± 0.07 a The Gaussian limb-darkening priors of (c/3 + d/5) = 0.0892 ± 0.018 and c/5 − d/3 = −0.4306 ± 0.032 were derived from PHOENIX stellar atmospheres, as described in the text. b Confidence intervals on Rp/R(cid:63) do not include the ∆Rp/R(cid:63) = 0.0006 systematic uncertainty due to stellar variability (see text). Table 3 Transit Parameters Inferred from Individual White Light Curves Parameter ∆Tc (days)a t14 (days) R(cid:63) (R(cid:12) ) a/R(cid:63) i (◦ ) b Rp /R(cid:63) Visit 3 Visit 2 Visit 1 −0.0020 0.00028 ± 0.00031 0.0002 ± 0.0004 −0.0001+0.0012 0.0357 ± 0.0007 0.0369 ± 0.0010 0.037+0.004 −0.003 0.211+0.021 0.200+0.008 0.214+0.015 −0.014 −0.006 −0.011 14.4 ± 0.9 14+1−1 15.4+0.5−0.6 89.2 ± 0.6 88.9 ± 0.7 88.5+0.8−0.7 0.21 ± 0.15 0.27 ± 0.17 0.38+0.13−0.20 0.1164+0.0009 0.1159+0.0011 0.1175+0.0011 −0.0008 −0.0009 −0.0012 predicted RMS acheived RMS s 337 ppm 343 ppm 1.07+0.13−0.11 337 ppm 360 ppm 1.12+0.13−0.11 337 ppm 366 ppm 1.14+0.14−0.11 a Offset between the observed mid-transit time and that cal- culated from the linear ephemeris with P = 1.58040481 and Tc=2454966.525123 BJDTDB . uncertainty rescaling parameter s is slightly above but consistent with unity, indicating the photometric scatter is quite well explained by known sources of noise. 4.5.3. Stel lar Variability GJ1214 is known to be variable on 50-100 day timescales with an amplitude of 1% in the MEarth band- pass (715-1000 nm; see Charbonneau et al. 2009; Berta et al. 2011). To gauge the impact of stellar variability in the wavelengths studied here, we plot in Fig. 7 the rela- tive out-of-transit flux as measured by our WFC3 data. For each HST visit, we have three independent measure- ments of this quantity: the F130N narrow-band direct image, the 0th -order spectrum, and the 1st -order spec- trum. Consistent variability over these measurements that sample different regions of the detector within each visit would be difficult to reproduce by instrumental ef- fects, such as flat-fielding errors. In Fig. 7, GJ1214 ap- Figure 7. The relative out-of-transit (O.o.T.) flux for each HST visit, measured independently from three different groups of im- ages: the summed 1st -order spectrum, the 0th -order image, and the narrow-band direct image, each normalized to its mean. Error bars denote the standard deviation of the out-of-transit measure- ments within each visit; they do not include the 0.5% uncertainty in the detector flat-field. The narrow-band measurements sample fewer photons, thus their larger uncertainties. pears brighter in the first visit than in the last two visits, with an overall amplitude of variation of about 1%. This 1% variability, if caused by unocculted spots on the stellar surface, should lead to variations in the inferred planet-to-star radius ratio on the order of ∆Rp/R(cid:63) = 0.0006 (Berta et al. 2011). This is larger than the formal error on Rp/R(cid:63) from the combined white light curve (Tab. 2), and must be considered as an important systematic noise floor in the measurement of the abso- lute, white-light transit depth. We do not detect this variability in the individually measured transit depths (Tab. 3) because it is smaller than the uncertainty on each. Most importantly, while the spot-induced variabil- ity influences the absolute depth at each epoch, its effect on the relative transit depth among wavelengths will be much smaller and not substantially bias our transmission spectrum estimate. 4.5.4. Modeling Instrumental Systematics Before calculating GJ1214b’s transmission spectrum, we detour slightly to use the white light curves’s high photometric precision to investigate the characteristics of WFC3’s instrumental systematics. Rather than cor- recting for the instrumental systematics with the simple non-parametric divide-oot method, in this section we describe them with an analytic model whose parameters illuminate the physical processes at play. We refer to this treatment as the model-ramp method. In this model, we treat the systematics as consisting of an exponential ramp, an orbit-long slope, and a visit- (cid:16) 1 − Re−(tbat−Db )/τ (cid:17) long slope. We relate the observed flux (Fobs ) to the systematics-free flux (Fcor ) by where tvis is time within a visit (= 0 at the middle of each visit), torb is time within an orbit (= 0 at the middle of (cid:26) D for the 1st batch of an orbit each orbit), tbat is time within a batch (= 0 at the start of each batch), τ is a ramp timescale, and the term 0 for the other batches allows the exponential ramp to be delayed slightly for the first batch of an orbit. The exponential form arises out of the toy model pro- posed by Agol et al. (2010), where a certain volume of the detector pixels has the ability to temporarily trap = (C + V tvis + B torb ) Fobs Fcor (5) (6) Db = WFC3 Observations of GJ1214b 11 charge carriers and later release them as excess dark cur- rent. In quick series of sufficiently strong exposures, the population of charge traps approaches steady state, cor- responding to the flattening of the exponential. Judging by the appearance of the ramp in the 2nd -4th batches of each orbit, the release timescale seems to be short enough that the trap population completely resets to the same baseline level after each 6 minute buffer download (dur- ing which the detector was being continually flushed each 2.9 seconds). Compared to these batches, the 1st batch of each orbit appears to exhibit a ramp that is either weaker, or as we have parameterized it with the Db term, delayed. We do not explain this, but we hypothesize that it relates to rapid changes in the physical state of the detector coming out of Earth occultation affecting the pixels’ equilibrium charge trap populations. The visit-long and orbit-long slopes are purely descrip- tive terms (as in Brown et al. 2001; Carter et al. 2009; Nutzman et al. 2011), but relate to physical processes in the telescope and camera. The orbit-long slope probably arises from the combination of pointing/focus drifts (see Fig. 3) with our imperfect flat-fielding of the detector. This effect of this orbital phase term could be equally well-achieved, for instance, by including a linear func- tion of the 0th order x and y positions (see Burke et al. 2010; Pont et al. 2007; Swain et al. 2008). The visit-long slope is not mirrored in any of the measured geometri- cal properties of the star on the detector, and is more difficult to associate with a known physical cause. In order to determine the parameters C , V , B , R, D , and τ , we fit Eq. 6 multiplied by a transit model to the last three orbits of each visit’s uncorrected white light curve. The transit parameters are allowed to vary exactly as in §4.5.2, including the use of the informative prior on the limb-darkening coefficients. The white light curves with the best model-ramp fit are shown in Fig. 5, and the properties of the residuals from this model are shown in Fig. 6. The transit parameters from this independent systematics correction method are consistent with those in Tab 3. We do not quite achieve the 280 ppm predicted scatter in the model-ramp light curves, and the residuals show slight evidence for correlated noise (Fig. 6). More complicated instrumental correction models could almost certainly improve this, but we only present this simple model for heuristic purposes. In all sections except this one, we use the divide-oot-corrected data exclusively for drawing scientific conclusions about GJ1214b. Fig. 8 shows the inferred PDF’s of the instrumental systematics parameters for all three HST visits, graphi- cally demonstrating the striking repeatability of the sys- tematics. As expected from the nearly identical cadence of illumination within each of the three visits, the ramp has the same R = 0.4% amplitude, τ = 30 second timescale, and D = 20 second delay time across all ob- servations. The values of τ and D are similar to the time for a single exposure, 25 seconds (including overhead). While the visit-long slope V is of an amplitude (fading by 0.06% over an entire visit) that could conceivably be consistent with stellar variability, the fact that it is iden- tical across all three visits argues strongly in favor of it being an instrumental systematic. B is the only pa- rameter that shows any evidence for variability between orbits; we would expect this to be the case if this term arises out of flat-fielding errors, since the 1st order spec- Figure 8. The a posteriori distribution of the instrumental sys- tematics parameters from the analytic model, in each of the three visits. The MCMC results for single parameters (diagonal; his- tograms) and pairs of parameters (off-diagonal; contours encom- passing 68% and 95% of the distribution) are shown, marginalized over all other parameters (including c and d with priors, t14 , and R(cid:63) ). V is measured in units of relative flux/(3 × 96 minutes), B in relative flux/(96 minutes), R in relative flux, and both τ and D in seconds. All visits are plotted on the same scale; for quanti- tative comparison, the median values and 1σ uncertainties of each parameter are quoted along the diagonal. The systematics param- eters are remarkably repeatable from visit to visit; also, they are largely uncorrelated with Rp /R(cid:63) (left column). trum falls on different pixels in the three visits. 4.6. Spectroscopic Light Curve Fits We construct multiwavelength spectroscopic light curves by binning the extracted first order spectra into channels that are 5 pixels (∆λ = 23 nm) wide. We esti- mate the flux, flux uncertainty, and effective wavelength of each bin from the inverse-variance (estimated from the noise model) weighted average of each quantity over the binned pixels. For each of these binned spectroscopic light curves, we employ the divide-oot method to cor- rect for the instrument systematics. To measure the transmission spectrum of GJ1214b, we fit each of these 24 spectroscopic light curves from each of the three visits with a model in which Rp/R(cid:63) , c, d, and s are allowed to vary. We hold the remaining parameters fixed so that a/R(cid:63) = 14.9749 and b = 0.27729, which are the values used by Bean et al. (2010), D´esert et al. (2011a), and Croll et al. (2011). For limb-darkening pri- ors, we use the same sized Gaussians on the same linear combinations of c and d as in §4.5.1, but center them on the PHOENIX-determined best values for each spec- troscopic bin (see §4.2). The correlation length of all parameters is < 10 in the MCMC chains. For most spectroscopic bins, the inferred value of s is within 1σ of unity, indicating that the flux residuals show scatter commensurate with that predicted from photon noise (1400 to 1900 ppm across wavelengths). No evi- dence for correlated noise is seen in any of the bins, as 12 Berta et al. judged by the same criterion as for the white light curves (see Fig. 6). Fig. 9 shows the transmission spectra inferred from each of the three visits, as well as the divide-oot- corrected, spectrophotometric light curves from which they were derived. For the final transmission spectrum (shown as black points in Fig. 9), we combine the three values of Rp/R(cid:63) , and σRp /R(cid:63) in each wavelength bin by averaging them over the visits with a weighting propor- tional to 1/σ2 . Table 4 gives this average trans- Rp /R(cid:63) mission spectrum, as well as the central values of the limb-darkening prior used in each bin. The wavelength grids in the three visits are offset slightly (by less than a pixel) from one another; in Table 4 we quote the average wavelength for each bin. In §4.5.2 we found that GJ1214’s 1% variability at WFC3 wavelengths causes ∆D = 0.014% or ∆Rp/R(cid:63) = 0.0006 variations in the absolute transit depth. The starspots causing this variability would have a similar effect on measurements of the transmission spectrum, but unless GJ1214’s starspot spectrum is maliciously be- haved, the offsets should be broad-band and the influence on the wavelength-to-wavelength variations within the WFC3 transmission spectrum should be much smaller. Each visit’s transmission spectrum is a differential mea- surement made with respect to the integrated stellar spectrum at each epoch; by averaging together three es- timates to produce our final transmission spectrum, we average over the time-variable influence of the starspots. Importantly, if GJ1214 is host to a large population of starspots that are symmetrically distributed around the star and do not appear contribute to the observed flux variability over the stellar rotation period, their effect on the transmission spectrum will not average out (see D´esert et al. 2011b; Carter et al. 2011; Berta et al. 2011). If we fix the limb-darkening coefficients to the PHOENIX values instead of using the prior, the uncertainties on the Rp/R(cid:63) measurements decrease by 20%. If we use only a single pair of LD coefficients (those for the white light curve) instead of those matched to the individual wave- length bins, the transmission spectrum changes by about 1σ on the individual bins, in the direction of showing stronger water features and being less consistent with an achromatic transit depth. These tests confirm that the presence of the broad H2O feature in the stellar spectrum (see Fig. 2) makes it especially crucial that we employ the detailed, multiwavelength LD treatment. As a test to probe the influence of the divide-oot sys- tematics correction, we repeat this section’s analysis us- ing the analytic model-ramp method to remove the in- strumental systematics; every point in the transmission spectrum changes by much less than 1σ . We also exper- imented with combining the three visits’ spectroscopic light curves and fitting for them jointly, instead of averag- ing together the transmission spectra inferred separately from each visit. We found the results to be practically identical to those quoted here. Because the transmission spectrum is conditional on the orbital parameters we held fixed (a/R(cid:63) , b), we under- estimate the uncertainty in the absolute values of Rp/R(cid:63) ; the quoted σRp /R(cid:63) are intended for relative comparisons only. Judging by the Rp/R(cid:63) uncertainty in the uncon- strained white light curve fit (Table 2), varying a/R(cid:63) could cause the ensemble of Rp/R(cid:63) measurements in Ta- ble 4 to move up or down in tandem with a systematic un- certainty that is comparable to the statistical uncertainty on each. This is in addition to the ∆Rp/R(cid:63) = 0.0006 off- sets expected from stellar variability (Berta et al. 2011). 4.7. Searching for Transiting Moons Finally, we search for evidence of transiting satellite compansions to GJ1214b in our summed WFC3 light curves. The light curve morphology of transiting exo- moons can be complicated, but they could generally ap- pear in our data as shallow transit-shaped dimmings or brightenings offset from the planet’s transit light curve (see Kipping 2011, for a detailed discussion). While the presence of a moon could also be detected in tempo- ral variations of the planetary transit duration (Kipping 2009), we only poorly constrain GJ1214b’s transit dura- tion in individual visits due to incomplete coverage. Based on the Hill stability criterion, we would not ex- pect moons to survive farther than 8 planetary radii away from GJ1214b so their transits should not be offset from GJ1214b’s by more than 25 minutes, less than the dura- tion of an HST Earth occultation. We search only the data in the in-transit visit, using the divide-oot method to correct for the systematics. Owing to the long buffer download gaps in our light curves (see §2), the most likely indication of a transiting moon in the WFC3 light curve would be an offset in flux from one 12-exposure batch to another. Given the 376 ppm per-exposure scat- ter in the divide-oot corrected light curve, we would have expected to be able to identify transits of 0.4 R⊕ (Ganymede-sized) moons at 3σ confidence. We see no strong evidence for such an offset. Also, we note that starspot occultations could easily mimic the light curve of a transiting exomoon in the time coverage we achieve with WFC3, and such occultations are known to occur in the GJ1214b system (see Berta et al. 2011; Carter et al. 2011; Kundurthy et al. 2011). Due to the many possible configurations of transiting exomoons and the large gaps in our WFC3 light curve, our non-detection of moons does not by itself place strict limits on the presence of exo-moons around GJ1214b. 5. DISCUSSION The average transmission spectrum of GJ1214b from our three HST visits is shown in Fig. 9. To the precision afforded by the data, this transmission spectrum is flat; a simple weighted mean of the spectrum is a good fit, with χ2 = 20.4 for 23 degrees of freedom. 5.1. Implications for Atmospheric Compositions We compare the WFC3 transmission spectrum to a suite of cloud-free theoretical atmosphere models for GJ1214b. The models were calculated in Miller-Ricci & Fortney (2010), and we refer the reader to that paper for their details. To compare them to our transmission spec- trum, we bin these high-resolution (R = 1000) models to the effective wavelengths of the 5-pixel WFC3 spectro- scopic channels (R = 50 − 70) by integrating over each bin. Generally, to account for the possible suppression of transmission spectrum features caused by the overlap of shared planetary and stellar absorption lines, this bin- ning should be weighted by the photons detected from WFC3 Observations of GJ1214b 13 Figure 9. Top panels: Spectroscopic transit light curves for GJ1214b, before and after the divide-oot correction, rotated and offset for clarity. Bottom panel: The combined transmission spectrum of GJ1214b (black circles with error bars), along with the spectra measured for each visit (colorful circles). Each light curve in the top panel is aligned to its respective wavelength bin in the panel below. Colors denote HST visit throughout. the system at very high resolution, but this added com- plexity is not justified for our dataset. The normalization of the model spectra is uncertain (i.e. the planet’s true Rp ), so we allow a multiplicative factor in Rp/R(cid:63) to be applied to each (giving 24-1=23 degrees of freedom for all models). Varying the bin size between 2 and 50 pixels wide does not significantly change any of the results we quote in this section. A solar composition atmosphere in thermochemical equilibrium is a terrible fit to the WFC3 spectrum; it has a χ2=126.2 (see Fig. 9) and is formally ruled out at 8.2σ confidence. Likewise, the same atmosphere but enhanced 50× in elements heavier than helium, a quali- tative approximation to the metal enhancement in the Solar System ice giants (enhanced 30 − 50× in C/H; Gautier et al. 1995; Encrenaz 2005; Guillot & Gautier 2009), is ruled out at 7.5σ (χ2 = 113.2). Both models assume equilibrium molecular abundances and the ab- sence of high-altitude clouds; if GJ1214b has an H2 -rich atmosphere, at least one of these assumptions would have to be broken. Suggesting, along these lines, that photochemistry might deplete GJ1214b’s atmosphere of methane, D´esert et al. (2011a), Croll et al. (2011), and Crossfield et al. (2011) have noted their observations to be consistent with a solar composition model in which CH4 has been artificially removed. With the WFC3 spectrum alone, we can rule out such an H2 -rich, CH4 -free atmosphere at 6.1σ (Fig. 10). This is consistent with Miller-Ricci Kempton et al. (2011)’s theoretical finding that such thorough methane depletion cannot be achieved through photochemical processes, even when making extreme as- sumptions for the photoionizing UV flux from the star. Previous spectroscopic measurements in the red opti- cal (Bean et al. 2010, 2011) could only be reconciled with a H2 -rich atmosphere if such an atmosphere were to host a substantial cloud layer at an altitude above 200 mbar (see Miller-Ricci Kempton et al. 2011). How far the flat- tening influence of such a cloud layer would extend be- yond 1 µm to WFC3 wavelengths would depend on both the concentration and size distribution of the scattering particles. As such, we explore possible cloud scenarios consistent with the WFC3 spectrum in an ad hoc fash- ion, using a solar composition atmosphere and arbitrarily cutting off transmission below various pressures to emu- late optically thick cloud decks at different altitudes in the atmosphere. Fig. 11 summarizes the results. A cloud deck at 100 mbar, which would be sufficient to flatten the red optical spectrum, is ruled out at 5.7σ (χ2 = 82.8). Due to higher opacities between 1.1 and 1.7 µm, WFC3 probes higher altitudes in the atmosphere than the red optical, requiring clouds closer to 10 mbar to match the data (χ2 = 23.4). Note, with the term “clouds” we refer to all types of particles that cause broad-band extinction, whether they scatter or absorb, and whether they were formed through near-equilibrium condensation (such as Earth’s water clouds) or through upper atmosphere pho- tochemistry (such as Titan’s haze). Fortney (2005) and Miller-Ricci Kempton et al. (2011) identified KCl and ZnS as condensates that would be likely to form in GJ1214b’s atmosphere, but found they would condense deeper in the atmosphere (200-500 mbar) than required by the WFC3 spectrum and would proba- bly not be optically thick. While winds may be able to 14 Berta et al. Figure 10. The WFC3 transmission spectrum of GJ1214b (black circles with error bars) compared to theoretical models (colorful lines) with a variety of compositions. The high resolution models are shown here smoothed for clarity, but were binned over each measured spectroscopic bin for the χ2 comparisons. The amplitude of features in the model transmission spectra increases as the mean molecular weight decreases between a 100% water atmosphere (µ = 18) and a solar composition atmosphere (µ = 2.36). a large mean molecular weight. We test this possibility with H2 atmospheres that contain increasing fractions of H2O. This is a toy model, but including molecules other than H2 or H2O in the atmosphere would serve prin- cipally to increase µ without substantially altering the opacity between 1.1 and 1.7 µm, so the limits we place on µ are robust. We find that an atmosphere with a 10% water by number (50% by mass) is disfavored by the WFC3 spectrum at 3.1σ (χ2 = 47.8), as shown in Fig. 9. All fractions of water above 20% (70% by mass) are good fits to the data (χ2 < 25.5). The 10% wa- ter atmosphere would have a minimum mean molecular weight of µ = 3.6, which we take as a lower limit on the atmosphere’s mean molecular weight. For the sake of placing the WFC3 transmission spec- trum in the context of other observations of GJ1214b, we also display it alongside the published transmission spec- tra from the VLT (Bean et al. 2010, 2011), CFHT (Croll et al. 2011), Magellan (Bean et al. 2011), and Spitzer (D´esert et al. 2011a) in Fig. 12. Stellar variability could cause individual sets of observations to move up and down on this plot by as much as ∆D = 0.014% for mea- surements in the near-IR (Berta et al. 2011); we indicate this range of potential offsets by an arrow at the right of the plot. We display the measurements in Fig. 12 with no relative offsets applied and note that their general agreement is consistent with the predicted small influ- ence of stellar variability. Depending on the temperature contrast of the spots, however, the variability could be larger by a factor of 2 − 3× in the optical, and we cau- tion the reader to consider this systematic uncertainty when comparing depths between individual studies. For instance, the slight apparent rise in Rp/R(cid:63) toward 0.6 µm, that would potentially be consistent with Rayleigh scattering in a low-µ atmosphere, could also be easily ex- plained through the poorly constrained behavior of the star in the optical. Indeed, Bean et al. (2011) found a significant offset between datasets that overlap in wave- length (near 0.8 µm) but were taken in different years, suggesting variability plays a non-negligible role at these wavelengths. Finally, we note that any model with µ > 4, such as one with a > 50% mass fraction of water, would be con- sistent with the measurements from Bean et al. (2010), D´esert et al. (2011a), Crossfield et al. (2011), Bean et al. Figure 11. The WFC3 transmission spectrum of GJ1214b (black circles with error bars) compared to a model solar composition atmosphere that has thick clouds located at altitudes of 100 mbar (pink lines) and 10 mbar red lines). We treat the hypothetical clouds in an ad hoc fashion, simply cutting off transmission through that atmosphere below the denoted pressures. loft such clouds to higher altitudes, it is not clear that the abundance of these species alone would be sufficient to blanket the entire limb of the planet with optically thick clouds. The condensation and complicated evo- lution of clouds has been studied within the context of cool stars and hot Jupiters (e.g Lodders & Fegley 2006; Helling et al. 2008), but further study into the theoretical landscape for equilibrium clouds on planets in GJ1214b’s gravity and temperature regime is certainly warranted. The scattering may also be due to a high altitude haze formed as by-products of high-altitude photochemistry; Miller-Ricci Kempton et al. (2011) found the conditions on GJ1214b to allow for the formation of complex hy- drocarbon clouds through methane photolysis. However such clouds might form, they would either need to be optically thick up to a well-defined altitude or consist of a substantial distribution of particles act- ing in the Mie regime, i.e. with sizes approaching 1 µm. Neither the VLT spectra nor our observations give any definitive indications of the smooth falloff in transit depth toward longer wavelengths that would be expected from Rayleigh scattering by molecules or small particles. This is unlike the case of the hot Jupiter HD189733b, where the uniform decrease in transit depth from 0.3 to 1 µm (Pont et al. 2008; Lecavelier Des Etangs et al. 2008; Sing et al. 2011) and perhaps to as far as 3.6 µm (see Sing et al. 2009; D´esert et al. 2009) has been convincingly at- tributed to a small particle haze. As an alternative, the transmission spectrum of GJ1214b could be flat simply because the atmosphere has WFC3 Observations of GJ1214b 15 Table 4 GJ1214b’s Transmission Spectrum from WFC3/G141 Wavelength (µm) 1.123 1.146 1.169 1.192 1.215 1.239 1.262 1.285 1.308 1.331 1.355 1.378 1.401 1.425 1.448 1.471 1.496 1.517 1.541 1.564 1.587 1.610 1.633 1.656 Rp /R(cid:63) 0.11641 ± 0.00102 0.11707 ± 0.00099 0.11526 ± 0.00098 0.11589 ± 0.00093 0.11537 ± 0.00091 0.11574 ± 0.00090 0.11662 ± 0.00088 0.11565 ± 0.00088 0.11674 ± 0.00085 0.11595 ± 0.00087 0.11705 ± 0.00089 0.11664 ± 0.00088 0.11778 ± 0.00088 0.11693 ± 0.00091 0.11772 ± 0.00090 0.11663 ± 0.00092 0.11509 ± 0.00100 0.11635 ± 0.00104 0.11626 ± 0.00091 0.11681 ± 0.00091 0.11443 ± 0.00091 0.11631 ± 0.00091 0.11620 ± 0.00092 0.11581 ± 0.00096 c −0.372 −0.397 −0.404 −0.410 −0.406 −0.403 −0.407 −0.403 −0.411 −0.390 −0.368 −0.371 −0.338 −0.295 −0.319 −0.322 −0.345 −0.305 −0.330 −0.351 −0.372 −0.399 −0.399 −0.415 d 1.068 1.088 1.089 1.090 1.075 1.063 1.064 1.045 1.042 1.068 1.101 1.110 1.075 1.029 1.056 1.061 1.084 1.013 1.042 1.059 1.072 1.082 1.075 1.081 (2011), and WFC3. The only observation it could not explain would be the deep Ks -measurement from Croll et al. (2011). Of the theoretical models we tested, we could find none that matched all the available measure- ments. We are uncertain of how to interpret this appar- ent incompatibility but hopeful that future observational and theoretical studies of the GJ1214b system may clar- ify the issue. In the meantime, we adopt an atmosphere with at least 50% water by mass as the most plausible model to explain the WFC3 observations. 5.2. Implications for GJ1214b’s Internal Structure If GJ1214b is not shrouded in achromatically optically thick high-altitude clouds, the WFC3 transmission spec- trum disfavors any proposed bulk composition for the planet that relies on a substantial, unenriched, hydrogen envelope to explain the planet’s large radius. Both the ice-rock core with nebular H/He envelope and pure rock core with outgassed H2 envelope scenarios explored by Rogers & Seager (2010) would fall into this category, re- quiring additional ingredients to match the observations. In contrast, their model that achieves GJ1214b’s large radius mostly from a large water-rich core, would agree with our observations. Perhaps most compellingly, a high µ scenario would be consistent with composition proposed by Nettelmann et al. (2011), who found that GJ1214b’s radius could be explained by a bulk composition consisting of an ice-rock core surrounded by a H/He/H2O envelope that has a wa- ter mass fraction of 50-85%. Such a composition would be intermediate between the H/He- and H2O-envelope limiting cases proposed by Rogers & Seager (2010). The H/He/H2O envelope might arise if GJ1214b had origi- nally accreted a substantial mass of hydrogen and helium from the primordial nebula but then was depleted of its lightest molecules through atmospheric escape. 5.3. Prospects for GJ1214b Future observations with the James Webb Space Tele- scope (Deming et al. 2009; Kaltenegger & Traub 2009), one of the immense next generation ground-based tele- scopes (GMT, TMT, ELT; see Ehrenreich et al. 2006), or possibly even a dedicated campaign with current fa- cilities, could detect the 0.01% transmission spectrum features of a 100% water atmosphere on GJ1214b, and potentially distinguish between clear H2 -poor and cloudy H2 -rich atmospheres. Along another front, simulations by Menou (2011) show that observations of GJ1214b’s thermal phase curve, such as those for HD189733b by Knutson et al. (2007a), would probe the ratio of radiative to advective timescales in GJ1214b’s outer envelope and provide an independent constraint on the atmospheric composition. Detecting the thermal emission from this 500K exoplanet is currently very difficult, and will likely have to wait until the launch of JWST. In the meantime, we advocate further study of the GJ1214 system in general. Confirming and refining the parallax for the system (van Altena et al. 1995) will im- prove our knowledge of the stellar mass, and in turn, the planet’s mass and radius. Likewise, further radial veloc- ity observations will empirically constrain the hypothe- sis by Carter et al. (2011) that a significantly non-zero orbital eccentricity could be biasing GJ1214b’s inferred density. 6. CONCLUSIONS In this work, we made new measurements of the GJ1214b’s transmission spectrum using HST/WFC3. Reaching a precision of σRp /R(cid:63) = 0.0009 in 24 simultane- ously measured wavelength bins, we found the transmis- sion spectrum to be completely flat between 1.1 and 1.7 µm. We saw no evidence for the strong H2O absorption features expected from a range of H2 -rich model atmo- spheres. Given the lack of a known source for clouds or hazes that could create a truly achromatic transit depth across all wavelengths, we interpret this flat WFC3 transmission spectrum to be best explained by an atmosphere with a high mean molecular weight. Based on our observations, this atmosphere would likely consist of more than 50% water by mass or a mean molecular weight of µ > 4. Such an atmosphere would be consistent with observations of GJ1214b’s transmission spectrum by Bean et al. (2010), D´esert et al. (2011a), Crossfield et al. (2011), and Bean et al. (2011) although it would be difficult to reconcile with those by Croll et al. (2011). Such a constraint on GJ1214b’s upper atmosphere serves as a boundary condition for models of bulk com- position and structure of the rest of the planet. It sug- gests GJ1214b contains a substantial fraction of water throughout the interior of the planet in order to obviate the need for a completely H/He- or H2 -dominated enve- lope to explain the planet’s large radius. A high bulk volatile content would point to GJ1214b forming beyond the snow line and migrating inward, although any such statements about GJ1214b’s past are sub ject to large uncertainties in the atmospheric mass loss history (see Rogers et al. 2011). Finally, this paper is the first published study using WFC3 for observing a transiting exoplanet. Aside from several instrumental systematics that were straightfor- ward to correct and did not require a detailed instrumen- 16 Berta et al. Figure 12. GJ1214b’s transmission spectrum from WFC3 in the context of observations from the VLT (0.6-1 µm; Bean et al. 2010, 2011), CFHT (1.25 + 2.15 µm; Croll et al. 2011), Magellan (2.0-2.3 µm Bean et al. 2011), and Spitzer (3.6 + 4.5 µm; D´esert et al. 2011a). While they do not measure an absolute transit depth, observations from NIRSPEC on Keck (2.1-2.3 µm Crossfield et al. 2011) disfavor models they tested that had amplitudes larger than 0.05% in their wavelength range; we represent these constraints with the dashed rectangular boxes. Two extremes of the models explored in this paper are shown, normalized to the MEarth-measured transit depth (see Miller-Ricci & Fortney 2010). It is important to note that stellar variability could cause individual data sets to shift up or down on this plot as much as ∆D = 0.014% in the near-IR or 2 − 3× more in the optical, depending on the stellar spot spectrum. tal model, the camera delivered nearly photon-limited performance both in individual spectrophotometric light curves and in summed white light curves. We are con- fident that WFC3 will serve as a valuable tool for exo- planet atmospheric characterization in the years to come. We thank Jacob Bean, Bryce Croll, Ian Crossfield, Ernst de Mooij, Leslie Rogers, Drake Deming, Avi Man- dell, Martin Kummel, Ron Gilliand, Tom Wheeler, and the CfA Summer Statistics Club for valuable discus- sions regarding this work. We are extremely grateful to our Program Coordinator Patricia Royle, Contact Sci- entist Howard Bushhouse, the WFC3 instrument team, the entire staff at STScI and NASA, and the crew of STS-125 for their crucial roles in enabling these obser- vations. We thank the anonymous referee for a thor- ough reading and thoughtful comments that improved the manuscript. E.K. acknowledges funding from NASA through the Sagan Fellowship Program. P.R.M. thanks CfA director Charles Alcock for enabling a sabbatical at SAO. We gratefully acknowledge funding from the David and Lucile Packard Fellowship for Science and Engineer- ing (awarded to D.C.), the National Science Founda- tion (grant AST-0807690, awarded to D.C.), and NASA (grant HST-GO-12251). This work is based on obser- vations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Tele- scope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. These observations are associated with program #GO-12251. This research has made use of NASA’s As- trophysics Data System. Facilities: HST (WFC3) REFERENCES Agol, E., Cowan, N. B., Knutson, H. A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1861 Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 27 Bean, J. L., D´esert, J.-M., Kabath, P., et al. 2011, accepted to ApJ, (arXiv:1109.0582) Bean, J. L., Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., & Homeier, D. 2010, Nature, 468, 669 Berta, Z. K., Charbonneau, D., Bean, J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 12 Brown, T. M. 2001, ApJ, 553, 1006 Brown, T. M., Charbonneau, D., Gilliland, R. L., Noyes, R. W., & Burrows, A. 2001, ApJ, 552, 699 Burke, C. J., McCullough, P. R., Bergeron, L. E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 1796 Burke, C. J., McCullough, P. R., Valenti, J. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 2115 Carter, J. A., Winn, J. N., Gilliland, R., & Holman, M. J. 2009, ApJ, 696, 241 Carter, J. A., Winn, J. N., Holman, M. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 82 Carter, J. A., Yee, J. C., Eastman, J., Gaudi, B. S., & Winn, J. N. 2008, ApJ, 689, 499 Charbonneau, D., Berta, Z. K., Irwin, J., et al. 2009, Nature, 462, 891 Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Noyes, R. W., & Gilliland, R. L. 2002, ApJ, 568, 377 Charbonneau, D., Knutson, H. A., Barman, T., et al. 2008, ApJ, 686, 1341 Claret, A. 2000, A&A, 363, 1081 Claret, A., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2003, A&A, 412, 241 Croll, B., Albert, L., Jayawardhana, R., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 78 Crossfield, I. J. M., Barman, T., & Hansen, B. M. S. 2011, ApJ, 736, 132 Deming, D., Harrington, J., Seager, S., & Richardson, L. J. 2006, ApJ, 644, 560 Deming, D., Seager, S., Winn, J., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 952 D´esert, J.-M., Bean, J., Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., et al. 2011a, ApJ, 731, L40+ D´esert, J.-M., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., H´ebrard, G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 478 D´esert, J.-M., Sing, D., Vidal-Madjar, A., et al. 2011b, A&A, 526, A12+ Dressel, L., Wong, M., Pavlovsky, C., Long, K., et al. 2010, ”Wide Field Camera 3 Instrument Handbook”, Version 2.1, (Baltimore: STScI) Dunkley, J., Bucher, M., Ferreira, P. G., Moodley, K., & Skordis, C. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 925 Eastman, J., Siverd, R., & Gaudi, B. S. 2010, PASP, 122, 935 Ehrenreich, D., Tinetti, G., Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Vidal-Madjar, A., & Selsis, F. 2006, A&A, 448, 379 Encrenaz, T. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 116, 99 Ford, E. B. 2005, AJ, 129, 1706 Fortney, J. J. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 649 Gautier, D., Conrath, B. J., Owen, T., de Pater, I., & Atreya, S. K. 1995, in Neptune and Triton, ed. D. P. Cruikshank, M. S. Matthews, & A. M. Schumann, 547–611 Gibson, N. P., Pont, F., & Aigrain, S. 2011b, MNRAS, 411, 2199 Gibson, N. P., Aigrain, S., Roberts, S., et al. 2011a, accepted to MNRAS, (arXiv:1109.3251) WFC3 Observations of GJ1214b 17 Gregory, P. C. 2005, Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: A Comparative Approach with ‘Mathematica’ Support, ed. Gregory, P. C. (Cambridge University Press) Guillot, T., & Gautier, D. 2009, arXiv:0912.2019 Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., & Baron, E. 1999, ApJ, 512, 377 Helling, C., Woitke, P., & Thi, W.-F. 2008, A&A, 485, 547 Hilbert, B., & McCullough, P. 2011, WFC3 Instrument Science Report 2011-10 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Hogg, D. W., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. 2010, arXiv:1008.4686 Holman, M. J., Winn, J. N., Latham, D. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1715 Hubbard, W. B., Fortney, J. J., Lunine, J. I., et al. 2001, ApJ, 560, 413 Irwin, J. M., Quinn, S. N., Berta, Z. K., et al. 2011, accepted to ApJ, (arXiv:1109.2055) Kaltenegger, L., & Traub, W. A. 2009, ApJ, 698, 519 Kim Quijano, J., et al. 2009, “WFC3 Mini-Data Handbook”, Version 1.0, (Baltimore: STScI) Kipping, D. M. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 181 Kipping, D. M. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 689 Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Allen, L. E., et al. 2007a, Nature, 447, 183 Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Noyes, R. W., et al. 2007b, ApJ, 655, 564 Knutson, H. A., Madhusudhan, N., Cowan, N. B., et al. 2011, accepted to ApJ, (arXiv:1104.2901) Kummel, M., Kuntschner, H., Walsh, J. R., & Bushouse, H. 2011, Instrument Science Report WFC3-2011-01 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Kummel, M., Walsh, J. R., & Kuntschner, H. 2010, ”aXe User Manual”, Version 2.1, (Baltimore: STScI) Kummel, M., Walsh, J. R., Pirzkal, N., Kuntschner, H., & Pasquali, A. 2009, PASP, 121, 59 Kundurthy, P., Agol, E., Becker, A. C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, 123 Kuntschner, H., Bushouse, H., Kummel, M., & Walsh, J. R. 2009, ST-ECF Instrument Science Report WFC3-2009-17 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Kuntschner, H., Bushouse, H., Walsh, J. R., & Kummel, M. 2008, ST-ECF Instrument Science Report WFC3-2008-16 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Kuntschner, H., Kummel, M., Walsh, J. R., & Bushouse, H. 2011, ST-ECF Instrument Science Report WFC3-2011-05 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Pont, F., Vidal-Madjar, A., & Sing, D. 2008, A&A, 481, L83 L´eger, A., Rouan, D., Schneider, J., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 287 Lissauer, J. J., Fabrycky, D. C., Ford, E. B., et al. 2011, Nature, 470, 53 Lodders, K., & Fegley, Jr., B. 2006, Chemistry of Low Mass Substellar Ob jects, ed. Mason, J. W. (Springer Verlag), 1–+ Long, K. S., Baggett, S., Deustua, S., & Riess, A. 2010, WFC3 Instrument Science Report 2010-17 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Long, K. S., Wheeler, T., & Bushouse, H. 2011, WFC3 Instrument Science Report 2011-09 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Mandel, K., & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, L171 Markwardt, C. B. 2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 411, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII, ed. D. A. Bohlender, D. Durand, & P. Dowler, 251–+ McCullough, P. 2008, Instrument Science Report WFC3 2008-26 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) McCullough, P., & Deustua, S. 2008, Instrument Science Report WFC3 2008-33 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) McCullough, P. R., & MacKenty, J. W. 2011, WFC Space Telescope Analysis Newletter 6 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Menou, K. 2011, submitted to ApJL, (arXiv:1109.1574) Miller-Ricci, E., & Fortney, J. J. 2010, ApJ, 716, L74 Miller-Ricci, E., Seager, S., & Sasselov, D. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1056 Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., Zahnle, K., & Fortney, J. J. 2011, submitted to ApJ, (arXiv:1104.5477) Nettelmann, N., Fortney, J. J., Kramm, U., & Redmer, R. 2011, ApJ, 733, 2 Nutzman, P., Gilliland, R. L., McCullough, P. R., et al. 2011, ApJ, 726, 3 Pall´e, E., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., & Garc´ıa Munoz, A. 2011, ApJ, 728, 19 Pirzkal, N., Mack, J., Dahlen, T., & Sabbi, E. 2011, Instrument Science Report WFC3-2011-11 (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Pont, F., Gilliland, R. L., Moutou, C., et al. 2007, A&A, 476, 1347 Pont, F., Knutson, H., Gilliland, R. L., Moutou, C., & Charbonneau, D. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 109 Rogers, L. A., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., & Seager, S. 2011, ApJ, 738, 59 Rogers, L. A., & Seager, S. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1208 Sada, P. V., Deming, D., Jackson, B., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, L215 Seager, S., & Sasselov, D. D. 2000, ApJ, 537, 916 Seager, S., Kuchner, M., Hier-Ma jumder, C. A., & Militzer, B. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1279 Sing, D. K., D´esert, J.-M., Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 891 Sing, D. K., Pont, F., Aigrain, S., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 1159 Sivia, D. S. 1996, Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial (Oxford University Press), xi, 189 p. Smith, R. M., Zavodny, M., Rahmer, G., & Bonati, M. 2008a, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7021, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Smith, R. M., Zavodny, M., Rahmer, G., & Bonati, M. 2008b, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7021, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Southworth, J. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 1644 Swain, M. R., Vasisht, G., & Tinetti, G. 2008, Nature, 452, 329 van Altena, W. F., Lee, J. T., & Hoffleit, E. D. 1995, The general catalogue of trigonometric [stellar] parallaxes, ed. van Altena, W. F., Lee, J. T., & Hoffleit, E. D. van Hamme, W. 1993, AJ, 106, 2096 Viana, A. C., & Baggett, S. 2010, WFC3 TV3 Testing: IR Crosstalk, Tech. rep. Winn, J. N., Matthews, J. M., Dawson, R. I., et al. 2011, ApJ, 737, L18+
1801.07707	4	1801	2018-07-30T13:33:52	Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. I. Adiabatic and convective models	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present nested-grid, high-resolution hydrodynamic simulations of gas and particle dynamics in the vicinity of Mars- to Earth-mass planetary embryos. The simulations extend from the surface of the embryos to a few vertical disk scale heights, with \rev{a spatial} dynamic range \rev{of} $\sim\! 1.4\times 10^5$. Our results confirm that "pebble"-sized particles are readily accreted, with accretion rates continuing to increase up to metre-size "boulders" for a 10\% MMSN surface density model. The gas mass flux in and out of the Hill sphere is consistent with the Hill rate, $\Sigma\Omega R_\mathrm{H}^2 = 4\, 10^{-3}$ M$_\oplus$ yr$^{-1}$. While smaller size particles mainly track the gas, a net accretion rate of $\approx 2\,10^{-5}$ M$_\oplus$ yr$^{-1}$ is reached for 0.3--1 cm particles, even though a significant fraction leaves the Hill sphere again. Effectively all pebble-sized particles that cross the Bondi sphere are accreted. The resolution of these simulations is sufficient to resolve accretion-driven convection. Convection driven by a nominal accretion rate of $10^{-6}$ M$_\oplus$ yr$^{-1}$ does not significantly alter the pebble accretion rate. We find that, due to cancellation effects, accretion rates of pebble-sized particles are nearly independent of disk surface density. As a result, we can estimate accurate growth times for specified particle sizes. For 0.3--1 cm size particles, the growth time from a small seed is $\sim$0.15 million years for an Earth mass planet at 1 AU and $\sim$0.1 million years for a Mars mass planet at 1.5 AU.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Preprint 31 July 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. I. Adiabatic and convective models Andrius Popovas,1,3(cid:63) Ake Nordlund,1† Jon P. Ramsey,1‡ and Chris W. Ormel,2 1Center for Star and Planet Formation, the Niels Bohr Institute and the Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark 2Anton Pannekoek Institute, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, C4.149, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3Rosseland Centre for Solar Physics, Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway Accepted 2018 June 27. Received 2018 June 14; in original form 2018 January 26 ABSTRACT We present nested-grid, high-resolution hydrodynamic simulations of gas and particle dynamics in the vicinity of Mars- to Earth-mass planetary embryos. The simulations extend from the surface of the embryos to a few vertical disk scale heights, with a spatial dynamic range of ∼ 1.4 × 105. Our results confirm that "pebble"-sized parti- cles are readily accreted, with accretion rates continuing to increase up to metre-size "boulders" for a 10% MMSN surface density model. The gas mass flux in and out H = 4 10−3 M⊕ yr−1. While of the Hill sphere is consistent with the Hill rate, ΣΩR2 smaller size particles mainly track the gas, a net accretion rate of ≈ 2 10−5 M⊕ yr−1 is reached for 0.3 -- 1 cm particles, even though a significant fraction leaves the Hill sphere again. Effectively all pebble-sized particles that cross the Bondi sphere are accreted. The resolution of these simulations is sufficient to resolve accretion-driven convection. Convection driven by a nominal accretion rate of 10−6 M⊕ yr−1 does not significantly alter the pebble accretion rate. We find that, due to cancellation effects, accretion rates of pebble-sized particles are nearly independent of disk surface density. As a result, we can estimate accurate growth times for specified particle sizes. For 0.3 -- 1 cm size particles, the growth time from a small seed is ∼0.15 million years for an Earth mass planet at 1 AU and ∼0.1 million years for a Mars mass planet at 1.5 AU. Key words: planets and satellites: formation, terrestrial planets -- protoplanetary discs -- hydrodynamics (HD) -- methods: numerical 1 INTRODUCTION We now know that the majority of stars in our galaxy host at least one planet (Cassan et al. 2012). We also know that planets form inside the gaseous and dusty protoplanetary disks (PPDs) that orbit stars during their youth. As it is now possible to spatially resolve the structure of young PPDs (e.g., with the Atacama Large Millimetre/sub-millimetre Array; ALMA), it is becoming apparent that the major- ity of PPDs have a rich sub-structure of rings, gaps, vor- tices and spirals (e.g. van der Marel et al. 2013; Isella et al. 2013; Casassus et al. 2013; ALMA Partnership et al. 2015; Andrews et al. 2016; Meru et al. 2017). Recent, spatially resolved observations of young disks with ALMA (ALMA Partnership et al. 2015; Andrews et al. 2016), as well as meteoritic evidence (Bizzarro et al. 2017), furthermore in- (cid:63) E-mail: [email protected] (AP) † E-mail: [email protected] (AN) ‡ E-mail: [email protected] (JPR) © 2018 The Authors dicate that planet formation starts early. What remains to be answered, however, is how planets grow efficiently enough under realistic conditions to agree with the astronomical ob- servations and meteoritic evidence. There are currently two scenarios for planet growth which are popular in the literature: First, the planetesimal accretion scenario, in which a planetary embryo is impacted by kilometre-size bodies and their mass is added to the em- bryo (e.g. Pollack et al. 1996; Hubickyj et al. 2005). Even- tually, the embryo becomes massive enough that gravita- tional focusing (Greenberg et al. 1978) becomes important and the embryo enters what is commonly called the 'runaway growth' phase. Planetesimal accretion ends when there is no remaining solid material in an embryo's 'feeding zone', e.g., when the embryo grows massive enough to gravitationally stir up nearby planetesimals, enhancing their eccentricities and effectively kicking them out of the feeding zone (Ida & Makino 1993). The growth of the, now somewhat iso- lated, protoplanet transitions to the much slower 'oligarchic growth' phase (Kokubo & Ida 1998). In this phase, the 8 1 0 2 l u J 0 3 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 4 v 7 0 7 7 0 . 1 0 8 1 : v i X r a 2 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel few, largest mass protoplanets grow oligarchically, while the remaining planetesimals mostly remain small. The critical time scale in this context is the lifetime of the PPD, which is of the order of several million years (e.g. Bell et al. 2013). However, numerical simulations of the planetesimal accre- tion hypothesis have the problem that they predict that it takes much longer than a PPD lifetime for cores to grow to observed planetary masses (e.g. Levison et al. 2010; Bitsch et al. 2015b). K , where ΩK =(cid:112)GM∗/r3 is the Keplerian frequency, The "pebble accretion" scenario has, meanwhile, demon- strated promise in being able to accelerate the protoplanet growth process significantly (Ormel & Klahr 2010; Johansen & Lacerda 2010; Nordlund 2011; Lambrechts & Johansen 2012; Morbidelli & Nesvorny 2012; Lambrechts & Johansen 2014; Bitsch et al. 2015b; Chatterjee & Tan 2014; Visser & Ormel 2016; Ormel et al. 2017, etc.). "Pebbles", in the astro- physical context, are millimetre to centimetre-sized particles with stopping times, ts, comparable to their orbital period, ts ∼ Ω−1 G is the gravitational constant, M∗ and r are the mass of and the distance to the central star. Pebbles are likely to form a significant part of the solid mass budget in PPDs, as indicated by both dust continuum observations (e.g. Testi et al. 2003; Lommen et al. 2009) and by the mass frac- tion of chondrules in chondritic meteorites (Johansen et al. 2015; Bollard et al. 2017). In this scenario, the combined effects of gas drag due to the difference in speed between the slightly sub-Keplerian dust (and gas) and the Keplerian embryo, and gravity ensure that pebbles are captured and settle to the planet. As the embryo grows, the efficiency of gravitational focusing of pebbles increases, and the effective accretion cross section becomes larger than the embryo it- self. The radius of dominance of the gravitational force of a planet relative to the central star is approximately given by the Hill radius: (cid:115) RH = a 3 Mp 3M∗ , (1) where a is the semi-major axis of the embryo's orbit, Mp and M∗ are the masses of the embryo and the central star, respectively. Particles of suitable size, passing the embryo even as far away as the Hill radius may be accreted, as has been shown analytically by Ormel & Klahr (2010), using test particle integrations on top of hydrodynamical simulations by Morbidelli & Nesvorny (2012) and using numerical sim- ulations with particles by Lambrechts & Johansen (2012). According to these works, pebble accretion is so efficient that it can reduce planet growth time scales to well within the lifetime of a PPD, even at large orbital distances from the host star. Herein, we present the first-ever high resolution simula- tions of gas and pebble dynamics in the vicinity of low-mass, "rocky" planetary embryos (for simplicity, often referred to only as 'embryos' in what follows) and report on the mea- sured accretion efficiency of pebbles. We consider three em- bryo masses: 0.95 M⊕, 0.5 M⊕, and 0.096 M⊕, and we specif- ically choose to study conditions expected for pressure traps associated with inside-out-scenarios of planet formation (e.g. Tan et al. 2016). The embryos are thus assumed to be em- bedded in disks that have a local pressure maximum at the orbital radius of the embryo. The presence of a pressure bump instead of a flat density distribution provides three advantages: (i) It eliminates the head wind otherwise associated with the slightly sub-Keplerian motion of the gas; (ii) It helps to trap particles drifting inwards from larger orbital radii (Whipple 1972; Paardekooper & Mellema 2006); (iii) High resolution observations (e.g. ALMA Partner- ship et al. 2015; Andrews et al. 2016) show disks with rings and gaps, which affect the distribution of solids in the disk. Having the pressure bump allows particles to drift into the pressure maximum, thus mimicking the observed behaviour. The structure of the paper is as follows. In Section 2 we describe the simulation set up, including initial conditions and their dynamic relaxation to a quasi-stationary state. We then describe, in Section 3, our treatment of particles, their equations of motion and how they are injected into the simulation domain. In Section 4 we describe the gas dy- namics that develops in our simulations and compare our results to other studies. In Section 5 we present our main results regarding particle dynamics and accretion efficiency onto planetary embryos. In Section 6 we present the first results of simulations of accretion-driven convection in the primordial atmospheres of rocky planets. Finally, in Section 7, we summarize our main results, discuss their implications and indicate future work. 2 SIMULATION SET UP This study is carried out using the new DISPATCH frame- work (Nordlund et al. 2018) in a three-dimensional, Carte- sian (shearing box) domain, with a set of static, nested patches. We employ a variation of the finite-difference STAGGER solver (Nordlund et al. 1994; Kritsuk et al. 2011) that, apart from the effects of transformation to a rotating coordinate system detailed below, solves the following set of partial differential equations: = −∇ · (ρu); = −∇ · (ρuu + τ = −∇ · (su), = ∂ ρ ∂t ∂ ρu ∂t ∂s ∂t ) − ∇(p + pa) − ρ∇Φ; (2) (3) (4) on a staggered mesh, where ρ is the gas density, u is the gas velocity, p is the gas pressure, pa is a stabilis- ing artificial pressure term, τ is a viscous stress tensor, = s = ρ log(p/ργ)/(γ − 1) is the entropy density per unit vol- ume, γ is the ratio of specific heats and Φ is the gravitational potential. The viscous stress tensor is taken to be = τi, j = ν1∆x(cs + u)ρ (cid:18) ∂ui (cid:19) (5) + ∂uj ∂xi , ∂xj τ = where ∆x is the grid resolution, cs is the sound speed, and the coefficient ν1 is a small fraction of unity. The artificial pressure is computed as: pa = ν2 ρ min(0, ∆x(∇ · u))2, where ν2 is a coefficient ∼ 1 (Kritsuk et al. 2011). (6) This allows a discretisation that explicitly conserves MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 3 mass, momentum and entropy. The viscous stress tensor sta- bilizes the code in general, while the artificial pressure term ensures that shocks are marginally resolved. The equation of state (EOS) considered herein is that of an ideal gas with adiabatic index γ = 1.4 and molecular weight µ = 2. Although not considered here, in a forthcoming paper we include radiative energy transfer and adopt a more realistic, table-based EOS (Popovas et al., in prep.). We use code units where length is measured in Earth radii, mass is measured in Earth masses, and velocity is mea- sured in units of 1 km s−1. Hence our time unit is R⊕/1km s−1 = 6371 seconds, corresponding to roughly 5,000 time units per year. Partly because the time step is determined locally in each patch, and partly because of the small number of cells per patch (333 in this case), the hydro solver operates near its optimal speed -- updating on the order of 1.4 million cells per core per second -- we performed these simulations using only a single, 20-core Intel Ivy Bridge node for each experi- ment. 2.1 Grid set up We use nested sets of Cartesian patches centred on the em- bryo. With the embryo as the origin of our coordinate sys- tem, the x-axis is parallel to the cylindrical radial direction and points away from the central star, while the y- and z- axes are oriented along the azimuthal and vertical directions, respectively. The +y-axis lies along the direction of orbital rotation. The embryo is assumed to move in a circular or- bit. Patches are arranged in a nested, hierarchical 'Rubik's Cube' arrangement,with 216 patches arranged into a 6×6×6 cube. The central 8 patches are then split recursively into 6 × 6 × 6 child patches, which have a three times finer reso- lution than the previous level. This is repeated for up to 7 levels of refinement (8 levels for the smallest embryo mass), while the coarsest set is duplicated 5 times in the y-direction. The size of the innermost, central, patch, exceeds the em- bryo radius RP by 10-30%. With 7 levels in the hierarchy, the outer scale in the vertical and radial directions is then ∼ 5000RP, which is about 4 times a typical disk scale height for an Earth-mass planet, and ∼20x larger than the Hill ra- dius. In the y-direction, the model extends to ∼ 25000RP. Each patch contains 33×33×33 cells, leading to a maximum resolution in our simulations, near the embryo's surface, of ≈ 3%RP. This resolution is higher than has been used in pre- vious works (e.g. D'Angelo & Bodenheimer 2013; Cimerman et al. 2017; Lambrechts & Lega 2017). Since the numerical viscosity is proportional to the cell size (cf. Eq. 5), the nu- merical viscosity in our simulations is also correspondingly smaller than in these previous studies1. 2.2 Initial conditions We consider a local shearing flow in the reference frame that co-moves with the embryo at the local Keplerian frequency, ΩK. We ignore the slight curvature of the partial orbit but include the Coriolis force resulting from the orbital motion. The origin of the co-moving frame is, depending on the simu- lation run, placed at either 1 or 1.5 astronomical units (AU). The initial gas velocity is then given by: u(t = 0) = − (cid:18) 3 (cid:19) (7) + ζp ΩKxy, 2 where ζp is a pressure trap parameter, defined below. In this study, we do not consider a systematic accretion flow towards the central star, nor the headwind that an embryo experiences when the gas is slightly sub-Keplerian. In ana- lytically constructed accretion disks, with pressure decreas- ing systematically with radius, the headwind is typically on the order of one percent of the Keplerian velocity, but when an embryo is embedded in a local pressure bump there is no headwind. A systematic accretion flow would allow the smallest size particles to escape the pressure trap, and would thus tend to increase the fraction of large size particles, but since we are mainly concerned with measuring the accretion efficiency of different size particles, the possible evolution of the grain size distribution is not of direct importance for our study. The background vertical density stratification is set by the balance between the stellar gravity and the gradient of the gas pressure: (cid:32) (cid:33) ρ(z) = ρ0 exp − Ω2 Kz2 + 2ζp x2 2p0/ρ0 , (8) where ρ0 and p0 are the disk midplane density and pres- sure, respectively, and are estimated from the 2D radiative disk models of Bitsch et al. (2015a). The ζp term gives rise to a pressure gradient that balances the extra shear intro- duced in Eq. 7 above. A pressure bump produces a more self-contained region in the vicinity of the embryo's orbit, which retains the density wake produced by the embryo, preventing it from causing a forceful numerical bounce at the boundaries. This is also mitigated by the wave-killing boundaries that we use (see below), but a less forceful wake means a smaller region at the boundaries needs to be artifi- cially damped. With typical dust opacities2 on the order of 0.1 - 1 cm2 g−1, disks with surface densities similar to the Minimum Mass Solar Nebula (MMSN; Hayashi 1981) are optically thick in the vertical direction, since the MMSN nominally has 1700 g/cm2 at 1 AU. If early hydrostatic atmospheres that surround planetary embryos are assumed to be nearly adiabatic one can predict their approximate vertical struc- ture from knowledge of only the density, ρ0, and tempera- ture, T0, at the outer boundary. The pressure at the outer boundary of the atmosphere is assumed to match the local pressure of the surrounding disk. Therefore, for reasonable initial conditions, we approximate an adiabatic atmosphere profile outside-in to the embryo. From the EOS we have the 1 As demonstrated in Kritsuk et al. (2011), the effects of numer- ical viscosity are generally not larger in codes that use explicit numerical viscosity than in codes that rely on viscous effects im- plicit to the methods. 2 Chondritic meteorites typically have a fair fraction of "matrix", which corresponds to essentially unprocessed dust. This demon- strates that, at least during the epoch when chondritic parent bodies formed, dust provided substantial opacity per unit mass in the proto-Solar disk. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) 4 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel and the Bondi radius, , RB = GMp c2 iso where c2 iso is the isothermal sound speed. In fluid dynamics, the Bondi radius has no particular dynamical significance, other than being the radius where the pressure scale height of the atmosphere becomes comparable to the distance from the embryo, and the radius where trans-sonic bulk gas speeds would become unbound. (13) Note that the mass in such an adiabatic atmosphere is completely determined (apart from the equation of state) by the pressure and temperature at the outer boundary, and that if the external pressure is reduced the resulting mass is smaller. This implies that mass must be lost from such atmo- spheres when the disk evolves to lower densities (Nordlund 2011; Schlichting et al. 2015; Ginzburg et al. 2016; Ruba- nenko et al. 2017). 2.2.1 Parameter space In this study, we consider 8 cases: 3 different embryo masses (Mp = {0.95, 0.5, 0.096} M⊕) at 2 distances from the central star (a = {1.0, 1.5} AU), with different disk midplane densi- ties (ρ0 = {1 10−10, 4 10−11} g cm−3) and temperatures (T0 = {230, 300} K), as well as with/without a pressure bump (ζp = {0.0, 0.05, 0.1}). The basic parameters for all cases are summarised in Table 1. The radii of the embryos are estimated using the mass- radius formula from Zeng et al. (2016): = (1.07 − 0.21 CMF) M⊕ R⊕ where CMF stands for core mass fraction. We take CMF = 0.325, although the exact value is not important; taking CMF = 0.0 only changes the radius of the embryo on the order of 5%. (14) (cid:18) M (cid:19)1/3.7 , (cid:18) RP (cid:19) Figure 1. Radial temperature profile for a planetary embryo at- mosphere using an ideal gas EOS (γ = 1.4, blue curve) and a realistic, tabular EOS (red curve). pressure at the outer boundary: P0 = ρ0kBT0 µmu , (9) where kB is the Boltzmann constant and mu is the atomic mass unit. For each layer of the atmosphere, ri, we iterate over the set of equations: , ∆ ln Ti = ∆ ln Pi (12) where ∆ ln ri = 2(ri+1 − ri)/(ri+1 + ri). The temperature and pressure for each layer are then simply Ti = Ti+1e∆ ln Ti and Pi = Pi+1e∆ ln Pi , respectively. We use 500 logarithmically- spaced layers between half the embryo radius and the Hill radius. We then do a polynomial interpolation between these layers to map the density, pressure and temperature to each cell in the simulation box in order to construct the initial conditions in the vicinity of the embryo. ρi = Pi µmu kBTi ∆ ln Pi = ∆ ln ri (cid:18) ; GMp 2 γ − 1 γ (cid:19) ; (10) (11) ρi+1 Pi+1ri+1 + ρi Piri For the purposes of this study, an ideal gas EOS (γ = 1.4) is sufficient. As demonstrated by Fig. 1, the thermal profiles of the atmosphere surrounding an M = 0.95M⊕ em- bryo given by an ideal gas EOS and a realistic, tabular EOS (Tomida et al. 2013, updated by Tomida & Hori 2016) are only significantly different close to the surface of the embryo. Gas flows in the vicinity of the Hill sphere, as well as embryo particle accretion rates, are insensitive to these differences. With constant opacities and an internal heating source (due to the accretion of solids) such an atmosphere is convec- tive, and hence has a nearly adiabatic structure (Stevenson 1982). The atmosphere might have a radiative outer shell -- cf. the works by Piso et al. (2015) on giant planets and by In- aba & Ikoma (2003) for a terrestrial mass planet -- but this shell would not substantially change the physical structure of the atmosphere, and ignoring it is a reasonable approx- imation when constructing the initial conditions. In forth- coming work, however, we include radiative energy transfer in our simulations, and there the initial conditions take this radiative shell into account. The effective, dynamical boundary between the disk and the embryo atmosphere occurs at distances from the plane- tary embryo somewhere in the range between the Hill radius 2.3 External forces (accelerations) r3 + 3Ω2 = − GMp(xx + yy + zz) External forces, arising from the transformation to a rotat- ing coordinate system, and from linearising the force of grav- ity due to the central star, are added to the hydrodynamics as source terms: ∂u Kzz − 2ΩKz× u, (15) ∂t where r is the distance from the embryo. The first term in Eq. 15 is the two-body force from the embryo. The second term is the tidal force and has two contributions: the cen- trifugal force and the differential change of the stellar grav- ity with radius. Vertically, there is a contribution from the projection of the force of gravity onto the z-axis (the third term). The last term is the classical Coriolis force. Kxx − Ω2 To avoid the singularity of the two-body force, rather than using a 'softening' of the potential (e.g. Ormel et al. 2015a; Lambrechts & Lega 2017; Xu et al. 2017), we truncate it via r = max(r, 0.1RP). Truncation is better than softening, since the gas outside the radius of the embryo feels the cor- rect force, and the spherical boundary conditions (described below) negates the effect of truncation for the innermost MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 5 Table 1. Basic parameters for the different simulation runs. See the text for more details. Run m095t00 m095t05 m095t10 m05t00 m05t05 m05t10 m01t00 m01t10 m095t10-conv Mp [M⊕] Rp [R⊕] a [AU] T0 [K] 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.096 0.096 0.95 0.988 0.988 0.988 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.532 0.532 0.988 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 300 300 300 300 300 300 230 230 300 ρ0 [g cm−3] 1 10−10 1 10−10 1 10−10 1 10−10 1 10−10 1 10−10 4 10−11 4 10−11 1 10−10 ΩK 2π [yr−1] ζp xdamp ∆xmin [R⊕] box [R⊕] 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5433 0.5433 1.0 0.0 0.05 0.1 0.0 0.05 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 700 700 700 500 500 500 400 400 700 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.031 0.031 0.031 0.023 0.023 0.037 5186 x 5186 x 25930 5186 x 5186 x 25930 5186 x 5186 x 25930 4360 x 4360 x 21801 4360 x 4360 x 21801 4360 x 4360 x 21801 9773 x 9773 x 48866 9773 x 9773 x 48866 5186 x 5186 x 25930 cells, well within the radius of the spherical boundary con- dition/embryo. 2.4 Boundary conditions Using test simulations, we have ensured that our boundary conditions remain stable over long periods of integration time and under rather extreme conditions (e.g. highly su- personic flows, low densities). The "azimuthal" y-boundaries are set to be periodic, whereas the vertical z- and "radial" x-boundaries are set as follows: • Zero-gradient conditions for the entropy per unit mass. • The x- and z-velocity components are set symmetric with respect to the boundaries, while the y-component is extrapolated in the x-direction and z directions. • The density boundary conditions in the x-direction is constructed from assuming hydrostatic balance: ρx = ρxi exp − Ω2 Kζp T0 (x2 − x2 i ) , (16) (cid:32) (cid:32) (cid:33) (cid:33) where ρx is the density in the boundary at location x and ρxi is the density at location xi, which corresponds to the last cell inside a patch's active domain. • If a pressure trap is not present we assume a vanishing • In the vertical direction, we apply a similar condition: derivative of the density in the x-direction. ρz = ρz0 exp − Ω2 K 2T0 (z2 − z2 0) , (17) where ρz is the density in the boundary at location z and ρz0 is the density at location z0, which again corresponds to the last cell inside the active domain. We additionally apply the "wave-killing" prescription of de Val-Borro et al. (2006) to reduce reflections at the x- boundaries. It is only applied over a specific range, given by xdamp (column 9 in Table 1). 2.4.1 Spherical boundaries In these simulations we use "jagged", no-slip boundaries to approximate the embryo surface. Fig. 2 shows a 2D repre- sentation of these boundary conditions on a staggered mesh. Density and entropy are allowed to evolve freely everywhere; only the mass flux is constrained. We deem a set of cell MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Figure 2. Treatment of spher- ical boundary conditions on a staggered mesh. Blue and red squares represent horizon- tal and vertical mass fluxes outside the boundary, which evolve freely, whereas turquoise and magenta squares represent mass fluxes inside the bound- ary, which are set to zero. Green squares represent den- sity points that are subject to change, while yellow squares show density points that re- main constant throughout the simulation. faces that approximate the spherical surface to belong to the boundary. If the cell face is inside the spherical boundary, the mass flux is set to zero, otherwise it is allowed to evolve freely. Hence, density cannot change inside the boundary and cells that have faces belonging to the boundary react exactly as they should: inflows towards the boundary pro- duce a positive ∂ ρ/∂t at the boundary. The corresponding increase in pressure causes an increase in the outward di- rected pressure gradient at the last 'live' mass flux point, as expected at a solid boundary. This permits the system to find an equilibrium and react to perturbations from it, and since there are never any inflows and outflows through the boundary, mass is conserved. 2.5 Relaxation of initial conditions We allow the system to relax for 30 000 time units (which corresponds to about 6 years), in order to ensure that dy- namically consistent conditions are attained. Indeed, as dis- cussed below, tests demonstrate that it takes on the order of only one orbit for the initial conditions to relax. The density stratification well inside the Hill sphere is almost hydrostatic, but with deviations and fluctuations on short time scales, and it is thus not necessary to include the detailed dynamics of this region while larger structures are relaxing. Therefore, we begin our experiments by fixing the hydrostatic structure there, and set the spherical bound- ary to a radius of 27 embryo radii. We then 'release' layers (add an extra level of refinement, reduce the radius of the 6 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel spherical boundary, turn on the dynamics outside of the new spherical boundary) at successively smaller radii (9, 3 and finally, 1 embryo radii). The 'releases' are typically done at times = 10 000, 20 000 and 26 000 in code units. Successive releases are increasingly more expensive due to the smaller cell size and larger sound speeds, but need less time in code units to adjust to the surrounding environment (for essen- tially the same reasons, i.e., smaller scales and larger sound speeds). This procedure saves significant amounts of com- puting time during the initial relaxation phase. After the last release, the simulations are allowed to relax for an additional 4000 time units before they are deemed ready for the next phase. Figures 3 and 4 show large- scale and zoomed-in density slices at the midplane for run m095t00 at t = 0 and after a relaxed state is reached at t = 30 000. Panels on the right show the relaxed state with well established horseshoe orbits, density wakes, and slight den- sity perturbations ahead/behind of the embryo at the same orbital distance (discussed in more detailed below). Fig. 4 is a zoom-in of the same run with the Bondi ra- dius more clearly visible (largest red circle); the Rubik's cube nesting of grids is also visible. The dashed lines indicate the successive releases of the radius of the embryo (green - 27, yellow - 9, light red - 3 embryo radii). The tiny black circle corresponds to one embryo radii. The right panel shows the simulation when fully relaxed and, via streamlines, demon- strates that the disk gas penetrates deeply into RB, down to ≈ 20RP. At even smaller radii the atmosphere is nearly static, with motions that have a weak rotational tendency (see below). Fig. 5 shows the physical structure of the primordial atmosphere at both time = 0 and 30 000. The cuts are done along the x-axis in the midplane and along the z-axis at x = y = 0. As can be seen, the initial state is very close to the final state of the atmosphere, and there are only negli- gible variations for different cuts. Although the density and temperature profiles have changed slightly, the changes are minimal and the use of these initial conditions thus saves a lot of relaxation time (compared to, e.g., a sudden insertion of the planet's gravitational potential, which would require waiting tens of orbits with the maximum level of refinement for the dynamics to relax). Although the indnermost parts of the atmosphere still retain some weak random motions, by time = 30 000, the run has nearly reached a steady- state, when injection of particles can commence. Note that, as has been pointed out by Ormel et al. (2015b), a com- pletely steady, static state will likely never be reached in the vicinity of the embryo. 3 PARTICLES After relaxation of the fluid motions and density distribution for 30,000 time units (about 6 years) we add particles for the purpose of tracing the motions of selected sub-samples and reveal, for example, the typical paths of different physical size particles and to be able to measure the rate of accre- tion onto the planetary embryos. In these simulations, we consider macro-particles (sometimes called super-particles; Rein et al. 2010; Ebisuzaki & Imaeda 2017), each of which represents a swarm of real particles, with a given size and mass. We follow the particle motions, taking into account ex- ternal forces and gas drag, until they are accreted onto the planet embryo, or exit the domain through the x-boundaries. We consider particles as 'accreted' when their radial distance to the centre of the planet is smaller than the radius of the embryo. In order to have statistical coverage everywhere, the initial spatial distribution of macro-particles is chosen to be proportional to the local gas density. The actual dust-to-gas ratio is likely characterized by a strong settling towards the midplane, while the dust-to-gas surface density ratio should be essentially constant in the upstream flow entering the Hill sphere. However, rather than having to make assumptions about the settling, we instead analyse sub-populations of our initial distribution, tagging and following for example only the particles that initially reside within a given distance from the midplane. We use macro-particles with corresponding real particle sizes normally ranging from 10 µm to 1 cm, with a constant number of macro-particles per logarithmic size bin. However, note that we never integrate over size. The constant number per bin was chosen to provide good statistical coverage for all sizes when investigating the transport of particles in narrow size bins. We include 1 cm particles for completeness, even though such large particles are typically found only in CB chondrites (Friedrich et al. 2015), partly because there is no guarantee that the size distribution of chondrules in chondrites spans the entire size range that was available at the time of pebble accretion onto planet embryos. We also made complemen- tary experiments with even larger size particles (up to 1 m), to explore saturation of accretion rates with size. The shape of the relative size distribution will be mod- ified near the embryo, because large particles accrete more rapidly onto the embryo, while being replenished at the same rate as smaller size particles. The resulting change of the rel- ative size distribution is a result of this study, and does not need to be anticipated in the initial conditions. Note that, since we do not consider particle growth and destruction in this study, nor the back reaction of the par- ticles on the gas, we are free to renormalise the the actual size distribution of particles a posteriori by changing the interpretation of the statistical weight factors of the macro- particles. We can thus match any given initial actual size distribution, and derive what the final distribution would be. We also note that since the span in space and time of our models is very limited (relative to disk extents and life- times), ignoring coagulation and shattering is an excellent approximation; such effects may instead be taken into ac- count by modifying -- a posteriori as per the remarks above -- the initial particle distribution. 3.1 Equations of motion = aG + ad, The acceleration of macro-particles, dup (18) dt is governed by aG, the differential forces originating from the planet, the star and the Coriolis force, which, in analogy with Eq. 15, are aG = − GMp(xx + yy + zz) r3 + 3Ω2 Kxx − Ω2 Kzz − 2ΩKz × u, (19) MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 7 (a) Initial conditions at time = 0. (b) Relaxed simulation at time = 30 000 Figure 3. Relaxation of initial conditions for the m095t00 run. The panels show density slices and velocity streamlines at the midplane, with almost the entire extent of the simulation box in the x-direction and 1/5 of the way in the y-direction. Horseshoe orbits are clearly visible in panel (b). Panel (b) is plotted with a highly enhanced contrast (the colour scale spans only 20% in density) to show the wakes and density increase at the orbital radius in the y-direction. The white and red circles (barely visible in these figures) denote the Hill radius and the isothermal Bondi radius of the embryo, respectively. The embryo itself is smaller than a pixel. (a) Initial conditions at time = 0. (b) Relaxed simulation at time = 30 000 Figure 4. Relaxation of initial conditions for the m095t00 run. Intermediate scale density slices at the midplane. The large red circle is the Bondi radius. The solid green circle in panel (a) shows the current 'active' radius, while subsequent dashed circles show where future 'releases' will place a temporary embryo surface. The tiny black circle shows the actual radius of the embryo, which is reached after the final release. and the acceleration from the gas drag, ad = ugas − upart ts , (20) which is a product of the relative velocity of the particle, upart, with respect to that of the gas, ugas, and the inverse of the stopping time, ts, which, in the Epstein regime is: ρ•s ρvth , ts = where ρ• is the solid density (taken to be 3 g cm−3) and vth (21) is the mean thermal velocity of the gas. We further assume that particles are spherical. For simplicity and speed, we parametrise the stopping MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) time as: (cid:18) ts (cid:19) (cid:16) = s 1cm (cid:17)(cid:18) cd (cid:19) , (22) ρ 1 yr where cd = 10−12 g cm−3 is a normalisation constant, de- fined such that in the sub-sonic Epstein regime, the stopping time is 1 year for a 1 cm particle in a gas density of 10−12 g cm−3. This estimates the stopping time in the disk and outer parts of the Hill sphere sufficiently well, while ignor- ing the additional decrease of the stopping time due to the higher temperature near the surface of the embryo. Parti- cles that reach such depths of the potential well are in any case doomed to accrete, so nothing is lost by ignoring the 8 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel with solution: ∆t/ts ∆v = − (1 + ∆t/ts) (v − vg(t + ∆t)) . (25) In the limit ∆t/ts (cid:29) 1, the velocity ends up very close to the gas velocity (as it should), but without the need to take very short time steps, resulting in a much more efficient time integration. In the limit ∆t/ts (cid:28) 1, one recovers the normal kick-drift-kick behaviour. We thus advance the velocity in the first (kick) step with: v1 = v0 + ∆t (1 + ∆t/ts) (aG(r0, t0) + ad(r0 + v0∆t, t0 + ∆t)) . (26) Figure 5. Physical structure of the primordial atmosphere for run m095t00 at t = 0 (initial conditions; IC) and t = 30 000 = 6.1 years (fully relaxed). The horizontal and vertical cuts overlay each other nearly perfectly. temperature dependence, and doing so reduces the cost to compute the stopping time. Although this approximation may overestimate the stopping time slightly, the precise value is not critical, since there is in any case an uncertain factor that depends on the shape and porosity of the particles, and a different value can be compensated for by a corresponding shift of the assumed particle distribution. In a similar vein, there is no need to expand the pa- rameter space with different assumed disk densities, since that too corresponds to a rescaling of the particle stopping time, and a corresponding rescaling of the disk and adiabatic atmospheric structures with a constant factor in density. Because of its dependence on gas density and particle size, the stopping time can vary over many orders of mag- nitude. Given the time step, ∆t, that is necessary based on the velocity and acceleration of gravity, aG, one can thus have both ∆t (cid:28) ts and ∆t (cid:29) ts. The latter case means that the differential equation governing the particle path becomes stiff. To handle this, particle positions and velocities are up- dated with a modified kick-drift-kick leapfrog scheme (e.g. Dehnen & Read 2011), reformulated to give the correct rela- tive speed also in the asymptotic limit when the time step is much larger than the stopping time. Instead of sub-cycling, which is computationally expensive, we use the method that is commonly referred to as "forward time differencing", which ensures that the solution has the correct asymptotic be- haviour, both when the stopping time is very long and very short, and that the behaviour is also nearly the correct one in intermediate cases. With forward time differencing, the velocity update, as- suming for now only an acceleration due to the drag force, ad, may be written: v(t + ∆t) = v(t) + ∆v = v(t) + ∆t ad(t + ∆t) , where the acceleration is time-centred at t +∆t. The resulting update relation is: ∆v = ∆t ad(t + ∆t) = −(∆t/ts)(v + ∆v − vg(t + ∆t)) , (23) (24) The particle position and time are then updated (drift step) with: r2 = r0 + v12∆t , and t2 = t0 + 2∆t . Finally, the third step (kick) advances the velocity using the acceleration at the end of the full time step, with (28) (27) v2 = v1 + ∆t (1 + ∆t/ts) [aG(r2, t2) + ad(t2)] . (29) We have tested this formulation on particle drift in disks with known solutions (Weidenschilling 1977), recovering be- haviour sufficiently accurate for our purposes for arbitrary values of Stokes numbers St = Ωts. The particle update procedure is computationally ef- ficient, with the average update cost per cell on an Intel Ivy Bridge core increasing from 0.65 µs without particles to 0.72 µs with one particle per cell, indicating an average up- date cost of about 70 nanoseconds per particle. Most of that time is spend looking up properties needed to calculate the particle-gas drag force. 3.2 Injection of pebbles Once the simulations are considered to be fully relaxed, peb- bles are injected into the system. The probability that a particular cell in a particular patch will spawn a macro- particle is proportional to Nppc, the number of particles per cell (which need not be an integer). We set Nppc to 0.05 in most runs, but increase it to 1.0 in a few runs to improve the statistics when studying the distribution of particles in small volumes. The mass carried by a macro-particle is encoded in a 'weight factor', w = ρ∆V/Nppc, where ∆V is the cell volume. The weight factor is thus proportional to the mass of gas in the cell where the macro-particle originates divided by Nppc. An advantage of this approach is that the sum over all particles (or a subset defined by particle size or initial particle location) results in the total mass of those particles (to be renormalized by a preferred initial dust-to-gas ratio). However, because the mass contained in any given cell can vary substantially, particles may need to be split to avoid the situation where the particle mass in a patch is represented by too few particles. For purposes of efficiency, the need for splitting is only checked when a particle passes from one patch to another. If an inbound particle carries more weight than, e.g., five times the initial average in the MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) ρ (g cm-3)10−1010−910−810−7T (K)102103104r (RP)100101102100101102Density IC horizontal cut vertical cutTemperature IC horizontal cut vertical cutPebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 9 (a) Midplane. (b) z = 10 RP. (c) z = 25 RP. (d) z = 75 RP. (e) Vertical component of the vorticity in the midplane. (f) xz slice of uz at y = 0. Figure 6. Gas flows around the M = 0.95 M⊕ embryo in the m095t00 run. Panels (a-d) show the velocity magnitude at different heights above the midplane. The scale of the colour bar is deliberately held constant. Panel (e) shows the vertical component of the vorticity in the midplane and panel (f) shows uz in a xz slice at y = 0. Velocity streamlines are also shown. patch, it is split into a number of "child particles". The child particles continue to carry, also after any additional splits, a memory of their initial identity, which is needed for iden- tifying sub-populations based on initial physical location. When a macro-particle is created, it is assigned a ran- dom position inside a cell and a randomly chosen size: s = 10−3R cm, (30) where R ⊆ [0,1] is a random number. The spawned macro- particles are initially given the gas velocity of the cell. We spawn ≈ 2.6 million macro-particles in most runs, with 53 million in a few runs with Nppc = 1. We save a complete set of particle data when a snapshot of the gas dynamics is taken, but, for visualization purposes, we also separately save tra- jectory information for a smaller subset of macro-particles (∼15 000) at every particle time step. These 'tracer parti- cles' are used to accurately track the trajectories of accreting particles and correspondingly to show the escape routes of particles that enter the Hill sphere and then leave again. 4 RESULTS: GAS FLOWS We begin by investigating the gas flow patterns around the different mass cores. In the last several years, a number of authors have studied the hydrodynamics in the vicinity of embedded planetary embryos (e.g. D'Angelo & Bodenheimer 2013; Ormel et al. 2015b; Fung et al. 2015; Masset & Ben´ıtez- Llambay 2016; Cimerman et al. 2017; Lambrechts & Lega MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) 2017; Xu et al. 2017, etc.) across a broad range of different conditions (e.g. different core masses, orbital distances from the parent star, disk structures), physical processes (isother- mal/adiabatic/realistic EOS, with/without radiative energy transfer, magnetic fields, etc.). As illustrated below, our sim- ulations are consistent with these previous studies, while of- fering both a higher resolution and a larger domain around the embryo. Fig. 6 shows the details of the gas flow in the m095t00 run for the M = 0.95 M⊕ planetary embryo. For clarity, we zoom-in to the Hill radius (234 embryo radii, white circle). The red circle denotes the nominal Bondi radius, RB, which is ≈ 50RP. The embryo is marked by a black circle, but is too small to be visible in these figures. The first four panels show the velocity magnitude in the disk midplane (z=0), and at z = 10, 25, and 75 RP. As expected, the perturbation of the gas due to the embryo decreases with increasing height above the midplane, as indicated by the streamlines3. The velocity magnitude in the horizontal plane 75 planet radii above the midplane is nearly uniform along the y-direction, indicating that, at that height, there are no substantial perturbations where the embryo is located, consistent with Ormel et al. (2015b). We also observe that the width of the horseshoe orbits decrease with increasing height above the midplane, 3 Note, however, that the streamlines does not give an entirely accurate impression of the flow pattern because they only consider the velocity in the plane of the slice. 10 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel (a) Midplane. (b) z = 10 RP. (c) z = 25 RP. (d) z = 75 RP. (e) Vertical component of the vorticity in the midplane. (f) xz slice of uz at y = 0. Figure 7. Same as Fig. 6, but for the M=0.096 M⊕ embryo in the m01t00 run. (a) m01t00 run. (b) m05t00 run. (c) m095t00 run. Figure 8. Velocity magnitude in the midplane in the vicinity of the embryos as a function of embryo mass. which agrees with the results of Fung et al. (2015), but con- tradicts the isothermal results of Masset & Ben´ıtez-Llambay (2016). This might be attributed to the fact that we use a non-isothermal EOS, but further analysis of the horseshoe orbits is beyond the scope of this work. Panel (e) of Fig. 6 shows the vertical component of the vorticity measured relative to the rotating coordinate system. A clear vorticity pattern can be seen, with separators splitting the flow into regions that pass the embryo on the left and right sides. The flows passing on the "wrong" side contribute directly to pos- itive (prograde, counter-clockwise) vorticity, which adds to the rotation of the flow. Panel (f) of Fig. 6 shows the vertical velocity, vz , in an xz plane at y = 0. A vertical gas flow pattern can be distinguished: gas flows towards the embryo from the poles and moves away at the midplane. Zonal flow patterns are visible as closed streamline loops. Vertical velocities inside RB are of the order of a few cm s−1, which agrees well with previous works(e.g. Ormel et al. 2015b; Lambrechts & Lega 2017). Qualitatively, the M = 0.5 M⊕ case is very similar, thus the figure panels for this mass are presented in Appendix A; Fig. A1. The gas flows around the M = 0.096 M⊕ embryo (m01t00 run) behave somewhat differently, as illustrated in Fig. 7. Because of the lower embryo mass, the perturbations MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 11 away from pure shear flow are smaller, and horseshoe orbits therefore reach further in towards the embryo surface. The strong features in vorticity are correspondingly smaller. The vertical flows of the gas, meanwhile, approach the embryo over a broader extent radially, relative to the size of the Hill sphere. In our simulations, the gas flow patterns in the in- nermost region change with time, alternating between domi- nating gas inflows from the leading/outer horseshoe flow and the trailing/inner one. The locations of the stagnation points also vary with time. However, it is possible that part of this behaviour is related to the recursive refinement of the grid. We performed exploratory runs with the same mesh refine- ment, but without the planet embryo, and found root-mean- square velocities in the innermost region on the order of 10 m s−1. This is similar to the case with the low-mass embryo present, and hence the small scale, low amplitude motions are unreliable. These motions are not caused by noise gen- erated directly by the mesh refinement, but rather by slight differences in the cancellation of the force of gravity and pressure gradients, where small differences due to numerical resolution result in imperfect hydrostatic balance. 4.1 Gas dynamics close to the planetary embryos One reason why this work stands out relative to previous studies is that we are able to resolve the detailed gas dynam- ics (and hence accurate particle paths) in the close vicinity of the planetary embryos. Fig. 8 shows the gas velocity mag- nitude in the vicinity of RB for the M = 0.096 M⊕ (panel (a)), M = 0.5 M⊕ (panel (b)) and M = 0.95 M⊕ (panel (c)) embryo masses. The M = 0.096 M⊕ core is not massive enough to form a hydrostatic atmosphere -- the horseshoe flows constantly flush the atmosphere and only a tiny part of it (≈ 2 RP from the embryo) is nearly static. With increas- ing embryo mass, more gas becomes bound and the veloc- ity magnitude decreases. Nevertheless, there are always slow gas movements inside RB due to both gas from the disk that reaches deeper interior layers and from small scale turbu- lence. Therefore, the primordial atmospheres are never fully isolated and always interact with the surrounding disk. 5 RESULTS: PARTICLES An obvious advantage of our large simulation box is the large particle reservoir. Smaller simulation boxes, especially with non-periodic x-boundaries, often experience a depletion of macro-particles. This makes the accurate evaluation of accretion rates more difficult, and additional injections of particles may be needed (e.g. Xu et al. 2017). In Fig. 9, we show time-series of particle mass density from run m095t10 across a range of integrated radial layers (shells) from the embryo surface to twice the Hill radius. Black denotes the first snapshot after the injection of the pebbles (after 40 time units) while the other lines are plot- ted at 4 000 time unit intervals (which corresponds to ≈0.8 of an orbital period). We also plot the integrated density of the gas divided by 100 (the canonical gas-to-dust ratio), in cyan for the same radial bins. The bottom panel shows the number of macro-particles in each radial bin. Here, the ini- tial dips on the black curves stem from changes in the level of refinement. As time goes on, the number of macro-particles MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Figure 9. Mass distribution of solids in radial shells close to the embryo at different times for the m095t10 run. The vertical dashed and dotted lines show the Bondi and Hill radii, respec- tively. The cyan line denotes the gas density in each shell, divided by a canonical dust-to-gas ratio of 100. The lower panel shows the number of macro-particles as a function of radius. The bin width dr is 4.66RP. As initially local macro-particles with low weights are replaced by macro-particles with larger weights from larger distances, the statistical noise increases. Figure 10. Vertical distribution of pebble sizes in the m095t00 run 1.6 orbits after the injection of macro-particles. decreases due to accretion and transport, but new particles are continuously coming from further out. These new par- ticles originate in patches with lower numerical resolution (i.e. larger cell sizes), and thus carry larger representative weights. The increasing noise level, meanwhile, is due to the increasing contribution from these higher statistical weight macro-particles. Even after 2.4 orbits, Fig. 9 shows no indication of de- pletion of solids -- the mass influx through a given shell is sufficient to replace any accreted or lost particles. This im- plies that our initial injection of particles is sufficiently nu- merous to allow accurate measurements of accretion rates without further injections. Similar trends are seen for the other embryo masses; as the solid density is proportional to the gas density, we choose to not show separate figures for them. Npart100101102103104105R (RP)100200300400Solid density (g cm-3)10−1310−1210−1110−10100200300400Time after pebble injection (Ω-1)0.0160.821.622.43 gas / 10012 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel (a) Particle distribution over a 2RH vertical extent above/below the midplane. (b) Same as (a), but with a 2RB vertical extent (c) A zoom-in of panel (b). Figure 11. Gas density and spatial distribution of particles close to the midplane in the m095t00 run. The particles here are split into 3 size bins: 0.001 < s ≤ 0.01 cm (yellow), 0.01 < s ≤ 0.1 cm (red), and 0.1 < s ≤ 1 cm (green). The black circle denotes the Hill sphere, while the red circle denotes the Bondi radius. 5.1 The distribution of particles We initialize particles uniformly in the dust-to-gas ratio, and we therefore assume the initial vertical stratification of par- ticles is the same as that of the gas. Particles then settle to- wards the midplane due to the vertical force of gravity, with settling time scales of the order of 1/(tsΩ2 time scale for small and intermediate size particles particles is long relative to the duration of our experiments, while it is comparable to our run times for the largest particles. Lack- ing proper turbulence in the disk, the settling of particles is anyway not very realistic -- turbulence stirs up the particles and controls their scale height. Additionally, zonal gas flows (e.g. panel (f) of Fig. 6) close to the Hill sphere are capable of stirring up well-coupled particles. K). The settling Therefore, instead of working with ill-defined and un- known equilibrium populations, we choose instead well- defined, localized sub-populations with initially constant dust-to-gas ratios for our measurements of accretion rates. Tests have shown that it takes only ∼0.5 orbits after the in- jection of particles for the measured accretion rates to stabi- lize. The hydrodynamic flow patterns are established quickly as well, taking approximately the same amount of time. This shows that our initial relaxation of the flow patterns, which was allowed to continue for ∼6 orbital periods, was certainly sufficient and allows for accurate measurements of accretion rates. Fig. 10 shows the vertical distribution of pebbles in the m095t00 run, 1.6 orbits after the injection of macro-particles. The smallest particles (s ≤ 0.01 cm; dark colours) continue to show essentially the vertical distribution of the gas, while larger particles (s > 0.1 cm; green to yellow) have begun to settle. This figure also nicely illustrates how small a pertur- bation the Hill sphere is relative to the size of our computa- tional domain. Fig. 11 shows the spatial distribution of particles and their sizes at the midplane, two orbits after the injection of particles. This time, the particles are split into 3 size bins: s ≤ 0.01 cm (yellow), 0.01 ≤ s < 0.1 (red) and s > 0.1 cm (green). The vertical extent of particles we display is limited to 1RH in panel (a) and 2RB in panels (b,c), above and be- low the midplane. One instantly notices the two leading and trailing arms, stretching away from the embryo. The large concentration of particles there indicates that these particles are moving away from the embryo very slowly. The wakes are located just inside the separatrix sheets of the horse- shoe orbit, with the smallest particles mostly concentrating in the outermost regions and the larger ones lying closer to the orbit of the embryo. These macro-particles carry a relatively small statistical weight, because they originate at patches with high resolution and small mass per cell, so the features are somewhat artificially enhanced in the Figure, but it therefore also nicely illustrates the preferred 'leaving' paths of the particles. A large fraction of these particles en- ter but then later leave the Hill sphere, and the features are therefore concentrated in the midplane. A zoom-in to RB (panel (c)) reveals that there is a concentration of small particles (s < 0.1 cm) inside the Bondi sphere. Larger particles do not linger there for long since they are effectively accreted. The figure shows particle paths based on high-cadence positions of tracer-particles, sub-divided into 3 size bins. The green colour represents 0.001 ≤ s < 0.01 cm, blue 0.01 ≤ s < 0.1 cm and black s0.1 ≤ s < 1 cm size particles. The smallest particles spend around 0.1Ω−1 inside the Bondi sphere before they reach MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 13 (a) m095t10 (b) m05t10 (c) m01t10 Figure 12. Trajectories of accreted particles. The axes are given in units of embryo radii. Green, blue and black paths are for particle sizes 0.001 ≤ s < 0.01 cm, 0.01 ≤ s < 0.1 cm, and 0.1 ≤ s < 1 cm, respectively. the embryo. In contrast, particles with s ≥ 0.01 cm, are ac- creted on average 10 times faster, after they reach the Bondi sphere. Alternatively, some of the smallest particles, if they linger far enough from the embryo, are later carried out by the horseshoe gas flows. In these runs we do not consider convection driven by the accretion heating (but see below), particle growth and evaporation. Sufficiently strong convection could possibly prevent the smallest particles from reaching the core. Also, as the gas temperature close to the embryo (≈ 4500 K near the M = 0.95 M⊕ embryo) greatly exceeds the melting point of any solid, evaporation of solids and the resulting enrich- ment of the atmosphere with heavy elements (e.g. Alibert 2017; Brouwers et al. 2017), is bound to play an important role in models with a realistic treatment of evaporation. As shown by Fig. 1, a more realistic equation of state leads to lower temperatures at the base of the atmospheres, but still large enough to cause evaporation. Fig. 13 similarly shows the spatial distribution of peb- bles close to the midplane (inside 2RB) in the m01t00 run. It shows a very similar picture -- escaping particles are trapped in the leading/inner and trailing/outer horseshoe orbit parts. The zoom-in of the Figure (panel b) reveals an interesting, but expected difference -- there is no accumu- lation of particles inside the Bondi sphere. There are two factors that contribute to this: the gas flows may be strong enough to readily carry small and intermediate size parti- cles away, and larger particles are rapidly accreted. Panel (c) in Fig. 12 reveals the answer: the stopping time, even of the smallest size particles we consider in our runs, is short enough that the gravitation of the embryo is not damped by the gas drag enough to prohibit particles from being ac- creted. The smallest particles in our simulation take merely a 0.04 Ω−1 to be accreted. And the number of these small- est particles crossing the Bondi sphere is much larger, com- pared to the M = 0.95 M⊕ embryo. Here we remind the reader that we do not trace all the particles with this high cadence, therefore only a fraction of all the accreted parti- cles are shown in Fig. 12 (we also, for greater clarity, limit the number of traces shown in these figures to 150). Fig. 12 shows evidence for a variation of hydrodynam- MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) ical deflection (e.g. Sellentin et al. 2013) - higher mass embryos are accompanied by much denser primordial at- mospheres, in which the stopping times become smaller. Whereas the majority of the particles in the distribution we consider here have nearly ballistic orbits when being ac- creted by the lowest mass embryo (Fig. 12, panel (c)), they become significantly affected by the higher gas density en- velopes in panels (b) and (a). In the latter, the highest-mass embryo case, the motion of the gas almost completely con- trols the motion of particles with size s < 0.01 cm. 5.2 Accretion of pebbles When pebbles approach an embryo they are subject to an increasing two-body force and start to veer towards the em- bryo. Although from Fig. 12 it might seem that they come from all over the place, the figure greatly under-represents the particles (150 traces selected out of 15 000, again ran- domly selected from ≈2.6 million macro-particles), and the scales are concentrated to the closest 10-20 planetary radii around the embryos. The full ensemble of trace-particles in fact show distinct inflows and outflows through the Hill sphere. Fig. 14 plots the mass accretion rates across the Hill sphere, Bondi sphere and the embryo surface over the course of the m095t10 run, displayed as a set of Hammer projec- tions. The macro-particles are sub-divided into 3 represen- tative size-bins (0.0 ≤ s ≤ 0.01 cm, 0.01 < s ≤ 0.1 cm and 0.1 < s ≤ 1.0 cm). The figures show that the bulk of the net accretion comes from near the midplane, and predom- inantly from the large size particles. As they do not feel much gas drag, some of the largest particles can and do cross the Hill sphere from arbitrary directions. The domi- nating inflow regions are associated with the inner/trailing and outer/leading horseshoe orbits, and corresponding out- flows in the outer/trailing and inner/leading horseshoe or- bits. The accretion rates at distances RB are much more isotropic, without clearly preferred trajectories. The modest outflows are mainly close to the midplane region. Not all of the mass accreted through the Bondi sphere reaches the embryo surface during the time scales we consider here. The 14 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel the figures for M= 0.5 M⊕ and M = 0.096 M⊕, embryos are in Appendix A. To better illustrate the dependence of accretion on par- ticle size, an animation showing the trajectories of pebbles in the vicinity of an M = 0.95 M⊕ embryo (m095t10) is avail- able on-line as supplementary material (and on YouTube 4). In the animation, cyan represents 0.0 ≤ s ≤ 0.01 cm parti- cles, red represents 0.01 < s ≤ 0.1 cm particles and yellow represents 0.1 < s ≤ 1.0 cm particles. Velocity streamlines are shown in green. The coloured circles meanwhile denote the Hill radius (magenta) and the "nominal" effective accre- tion radii for unperturbed flow, reff (Lambrechts & Johansen 2012, eq. 40; see below) for the three, aforementioned size bins. The animation clearly illustrates that: (i) particles that pass within their respective reff are accreted; (ii) small, well- coupled particles are particularly affected by the gas flow and often do not reach reff. 5.3 Quantitative measurements of accretion rates To allow selection of arbitrary sub-populations, our initial particle population is distributed all over space, with weights proportional to the local cell gas mass. To obtain accretion rates pertaining to a disk where particles have settled to- wards the midplane, we select the sub-population that ini- tially resides within one Hill radius from the midplane, and subsequently measure accretion rates based on only those particles, renormalising their macro-particle weights w so they correspond to a total mass equal to the assumed dust- to-gas ratio (0.01) times the total gas mass in the experi- ment. By sub-dividing the particle distribution into 6 size bins, we can study the dependency of the accretion rates on size. Fig. 15 shows that the net accretion rate onto the embryo scales linearly with the size s, which is different than the s2/3 scaling predicted by e.g. Ormel & Klahr (2010); Lambrechts & Johansen (2012), assuming unperturbed shear flow condi- tions. As acknowledged in Lambrechts & Johansen (2012), these conditions only hold when the mass of the planet em- bryo is very small. The key reason this scaling does not hold in our simulations is because the flow pattern (i.e. horseshoe orbits with stagnation points/separatrix surfaces) and den- sity (with contrasts of the order of 103) in the vicinity of the planet are very different from unperturbed shear flow. Small, well-coupled particles are most strongly affected by these differences; they tend to follow gas streamlines, and therefore follow horseshoe orbits or are deflected around the planet. As a result, the dependence of the accretion rate on particle size becomes steeper than 2/3. The measured linear scaling is valid even for larger particles, all the way to dm- sized particles, as illustrated in Fig. 16. The accretion rate saturates (no longer increases with particle size) for particles larger than about 1 meter. A crude measure for the importance of flow effects for pebble accretion can be obtained by equating the pebble ac- cretion impact radius in the shear limit (reff ∼ τ1/3RH, where τ is the Stokes number) with the Bondi radius RB -- the scale on which flow effects are expected to become important. For reff < RB flow effects may be expected to change accretion 4 https://youtu.be/2GNgoc71qIw MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) (a) Spatial distribution of particles over a 2RB vertical extent above/below the mid- plane. The black circle denotes the Hill sphere. (b) A zoom-in of panel (a) to the Bondi sphere. The red circle denotes the Bondi sphere. Figure 13. Gas density and spatial distribution of particles close to the midplane in the m01t00 run. The pebbles here are split into 3 size bins: yellow s ≤ 0.01 cm, red 0.01 < s ≤ 0.1cm and s > 0.1 cm are green. missing mass is contained in the smallest particles, which trace the gas flows very closely. Having even the slightest turbulence in the primordial atmosphere (which is always the case, as discussed earlier) traps these particles and pro- hibits them from reaching the surface over sufficiently small time scales, but nonetheless, they eventually are accreted. That said, as the experiments approach a steady-state, the net accretion rate across a sphere of a given radius (e.g. RH or RB) centred on the embryo approaches parity with the accretion rate onto the embryo. The two top rows of Fig. 14 also show how inefficiently the subsets of smaller particles are accreted. Very similar trends are present in the other two embryo mass cases we consider in this work, therefore, Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 15 Figure 14. From left to right, the mass accretion rate across the Hill sphere, Bondi sphere and embryo surface, respectively, over the course of the m095t10 run, displayed as a Hammer projection. From top to bottom are the particle accretion rates for three size bins 0.0 ≤ s ≤ 0.01 cm, 0.01 < s ≤ 0.1 cm and 0.1 < s ≤ 1.0 cm. A longitude of 270◦ corresponds to the -y-direction and a latitude of 0◦ corresponds to the disc midplane. Figure 15. Pebble accretion rates onto the embryo, for parti- cle sizes within each size bin, drawn from an initial distribution consisting of particles within ±RH from the midplane, for the three embryo masses, 0.95 M⊕(black), 0.5 M⊕(red), and 0.096 M⊕(blue). The green line shows a mass accretion rate propor- tional to particle size, s. rates that have been derived under the assumption of an unperturbed gas flow. Equating the radii, we find a thresh- old mass of MP∗ ∼ h3τ1/2Mstar, where h is the disk aspect ratio. Hence above MP∗ flow effects may modify pebble ac- cretion estimates based on assumptions of pure shear flow. This expression also states that smaller particles (smaller MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Figure 16. Pebble and boulder accretion rates onto the embryo, for particle sizes between 0.1 - 100 cm, subdivided into 6 size bins, drawn from an initial distribution consisting of particles within ±RH of the midplane for the 0.95 M⊕ embryo mass case. τ) are more severely affected, qualitatively consistent with what we find. However, to explain the reduction quantita- tively, i.e., to explain the linear dependence of (cid:219)M on τ that we find, requires a more thorough analysis, which will be considered in a future work. The runs with 56 million macro-particles give similar results as the corresponding runs with 2.6 million particles, with less than 10% difference in the accretion rates through Accretion rate [M⊕ yr-1]10−810−710−610−5Particle size [cm]10−310−210−1100M = 0.95 M⊕M = 0.5 M⊕M = 0.096 M⊕Accretion rate [M⊕ yr-1]10−510−4Particle size [cm]10−110010110216 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel 100%, except for particle sizes below 0.003 cm, which are still very well coupled to the gas there. Over size bins where the efficiencies are statistically well determined, they also scale approximately linearly with size. This is a consequence of the denominator (the unsigned, radially inward transport rate) being approximately independent of particle size (at a given radius) in our regime. We do not see significant systematic differences when different pressure bump parameters ζp are used for the same mass embryo. This is to be expected, since the results will only change when the radial settling has become significant. One would expect on the one hand a tendency for reduction of the accretion rates, because of the smaller y-velocities closer to the orbital radius of the embryo, and on the other hand a tendency for increase, due to the accumulation of large size particles. Ultimately, the accretion rates would be constrained by the radial influx of particles from larger orbital radii into the pressure trap. 6 ACCRETION DRIVEN CONVECTION The high resolution close to the embryo surfaces enables us to resolve convection driven by accretion heating. Accretion of solids onto the embryo releases a lot of potential energy, which is converted to heat via the friction force. To simulate the effects of the heating due to the accretion, we added an extra heating term Qaccr to one of our simulations, m095t10- conv. Considering a shell of extent dr at some distance r from the embryo, the volume dV = Adr, where A = 4πr2, then has a potential energy difference (which is per unit mass) given by Φ(r + dr) − Φ(r). To get an energy per unit volume we need to multiply with the mass accreted per unit time: (cid:219)MGMp 4πr4 , Qaccr = where Qaccr is the heating rate per unit volume and (cid:219)M is the mass accretion rate (which we set to 10−6 M⊕ yr−1). The heating rate, Qaccr, is then added to the entropy equation (Eq. 4) via: (31) ∂s ∂t = ... + ρQaccr Pgas . (32) Fig. 18 illustrates the consequences of the addition of the accretion heating term in the m095t10-conv run. It shows extensive convective patterns, which considerably modify the gas flows around the embryo (left panel). The horse- shoe orbits have somewhat receded, and the weak random flows that appear in non-convective runs are effectively over- whelmed by the much stronger convective flow patterns. The middle panel shows a vertical projection of the convective motions, which extend out to nearly 40 embryo radii. The vicinity of the embryo is no longer in a quasi steady state - the gas flow patterns constantly change, and the intercon- nection between the primordial atmosphere and the disk is thus strengthened; i.e., no parts of the atmosphere are effec- tively isolated. The convection is very dynamic, with local velocities reaching ∼1 km s−1, inducing sound waves when the convective cells reach the outskirts of the atmosphere. The direction of the outflows are constantly changing and now lack any significant constant patterns, but do have an MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Figure 17. Local pebble accretion efficiency (the net accretion rate divided by the radially inward mass flux across a sphere of a particular radius) as a function of particle size, for spheres of several different radii, drawn from an initial distribution of particles within ±RH of the midplane for the m095t10 run. the Hill sphere and less than 1% difference at the Bondi sphere. Thus the results are rather robust, even when us- ing only 2.6 million macro-particles. Naturally, however, the greater the number of particles, the smaller a fraction of the population one can sample from and still retain statistical significance; i.e., one has the ability to perform more focused studies of particle behaviour, as a function of size and initial position. The M = 0.95 M⊕ case, for example, initially has only about 20% of the macro-particles within one Hill radius of the midplane. Thus, to study midplane accretion rates it is useful to have a large particle population available. An estimate of the maximum accretion rate may be obtained by taking the dust-to-gas ratio times the average gas mass flux through the Hill sphere. For our M = 0.95 M⊕ embryo immersed in our 1/10 MMSN disk, this flux is ≈ 4 10−3 M⊕yr−1. With a dust-to-gas ratio of 0.01, we thus estimate a maximum accretion rate of about 4 10−5 M⊕yr−1. This rate is exceeded by about a factor of five in the 0.3 -- 1 m size bin in Fig. 16. By comparison, the 'Hill rate', ΣpΩKR2 H, is 3.9 10−3 M⊕yr−1 and nearly identical to the actual, 3-D gas mass flux. The accretion rates for the largest size bin (∼0.3 -- 1 cm) are approximately 3 10−6 M⊕ yr−1, 7 10−6 M⊕ yr−1 and 2 10−5 M⊕ yr−1, for the three embryo masses, respectively (cf. Fig. 15). The accretion rates scale, as expected, approxi- mately as the Hill rate time the Stokes number (proportional to M2/3a−3/4 with MMSN scalings). Fig. 17 illustrates the local efficiency of accretion of par- ticles across particular spheres in the m095t10 simulation. The 'local accretion efficiency' is defined as the net accre- tion rate through a sphere of radius R, normalised by the ac- cretion rate obtained by counting only the solids transport inwards through the same sphere (note that this definition differs from other uses of "accretion efficiency" in the liter- ature; cf. Lambrechts & Johansen 2012; Guillot et al. 2014; Ormel 2017). Evidently, a large fraction of all the particles entering the Hill sphere leave again without being accreted. As illustrated in Fig. 17, the local efficiency is particularly low (near 0%) for the lowest mass particles, which are well coupled to the gas and, due to temporal fluctuations in the accretion rate, can in fact temporarily show negative values. The local efficiency, meanwhile, rapidly grows for smaller radial distances, and at ∼30RP the local efficiency is nearly Accretion efficiency00.20.40.60.81Particle size [cm]10−310−210−1100RH100 RPRB35 RP30 RPPebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 17 Figure 18. From left to right: xy slice in the midplane, yz slice at x = 0 of the entropy per unit mass and particle paths in the vicinity of the core in a single snapshot of accretion driven convection in the m095t10-conv run. For clarity, in the middle panel, the gas streamlines are omitted. In the right panel, black curves show traces for particles of size 0.1 < s ≤ 1 cm, blue 0.01 < s ≤ 0.1 and green 0.001 < s ≤ 0.01 cm, respectively. approximately isotropic distribution of the velocity disper- sion. When we see or model convection at a stellar surface (e.g. in the form of 'granulation' on the Sun), the cellular patterns that develop are very much constrained by conser- vation of mass. In a stratification where mass density drops very rapidly with height, mass conservation forces the flows to "turn over", from up to down, which again forces the hor- izontal size to be limited (lest the ratio of horizontal to ver- tical speed become very large). Here, we have a situation that is quite different, with a "small" body at the centre of a large spherical volume. This situation allows the flows much greater freedom, with a possibility of expansion in all directions. The heating driving the convection in this study, com- puted assuming (cid:219)M = 10−6 M⊕yr−1, is not consistent with the actual, about 20 times larger measured accretion rates (e.g. Fig. 15). Moreover, radiative energy transfer and a more realistic EOS would tend to change the properties of con- vection, so to reach true consistency, improvements are nec- essary. Nevertheless, it is possible to learn already from the current experiment, which can illustrate to what extent the convective motions are able to affect accretion rates relative to an analogous non-convective case. The right hand panel of Fig. 18 shows a small subset of high cadence paths for accreted particles, colour coded by size. Although their paths are affected, the largest particles are not significantly stirred up by the convective motions. The smaller the particles are, however, the more they are affected by the convective motions. Quantitative measure- ments show that the average of the unsigned mass fluxes through spherical surfaces where convection is active is much larger than in the non-convective case. However, as illustrated in Fig. 19, we find that convec- tion in the current case does not significantly reduce the net accretion rate onto the embryo. Formally, the local accretion efficiency (the net mass accretion rate as a fraction of the unsigned, radially inward solid mass flux; Fig. 20) is reduced significantly for smaller particles. This is because convective motions gives rise to larger unsigned rates of radial mass transport, and hence increase the denominator in the defi- MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Figure 19. Pebble accretion rates in the accretion driven convec- tion run (m095t10-conv). Particle sizes are split into 6 representa- tive logarithmic size bins. The green line shows a mass accretion rate proportional to particle size, s. Figure 20. Local pebble accretion efficiency in the accretion driven convection run (m095t10-conv). Particle sizes are split into 6 representative logarithmic size bins. nition of local accretion efficiency. The convective motions also cause larger temporal fluctuations, and as a result we measure negative net accretion rates and a local accretion efficiency of less than zero at RB for some of the smallest size bins. The convective velocities in this case are generally on the order of the free fall drift velocities of the particles, as illustrated in Fig. 21, but the systematic drift of particles rel- Accretion rate [M⊕ yr-1]10−810−710−610−5Particle size [cm]10−310−210−1100RH100 RP30 RP10 RP Ṁ ∝ sAccretion efficiency00.20.40.60.81Particle size [cm]10−310−210−1100RH100 RP30 RP10 RP18 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel while feedback from the particle ensemble on the gas was neglected -- consistent with the modest dust-to-gas ratios oc- curring in the models. The motions of a subset of particles were recorded with high cadence, allowing for their trajec- tories and histories to be studied in great detail. Our main results may be summarized as follows: (i) Starting from approximately hydrostatic initial condi- tions, relaxation periods on the order of one orbit are suf- ficient to establish near quasi-stationary conditions in the vicinity of the Hill sphere. (ii) The relaxed atmospheric structures do not differ dramatically from spherically symmetric hydrostatic atmo- spheres matched to surrounding disk conditions at the Hill radius. (iii) Adiabatic and hydrostatic atmospheres with an ideal gas and γ = 1.4 do not differ substantially from atmospheres computed with a more realistic, tabular EOS (Tomida & Hori 2016). (iv) The presence of convection changes conditions well inside the Hill sphere from near-steady flows to dynamically evolving flows, albeit stationary statistics (e.g. velocity dis- persion as a function of radius) develop in less than an or- bital period. (v) The convective motions result in an enhanced mass exchange between different layers inside the Hill sphere, but do not significantly affect the mass exchange through the Hill sphere with the surroundings, nor do they affect the net accretion rates significantly. (vi) In our fiducial 1/10 MMSN model, the (unsigned) gas mass flux through the Hill sphere for our 3D horseshoe flows is about 4 10−3 M⊕ yr−1, and thus agrees closely with H = 3.9 10−3 M⊕ yr−1 (obtained the canonical "Hill rate", ΣΩR2 assuming Σ = 170 g cm−2 and RH/R⊕ = 231). (vii) The gas mass flux, scaled with the dust-to-gas ratio, is reflected in similar rates of particles passing both in and out of the Hill sphere, with inflow increasingly dominate for increasing particle size. (viii) As illustrated by Figs. 13 and 14, the particles that are not accreted and leave the Hill sphere have preferred paths along the separators of the horseshoe flow and are concentrated towards the midplane. (ix) In contrast, at the canonical Bondi sphere, the parti- cle fluxes are mainly inward (except for the smallest particle sizes), and hence changes in the detailed structure of the layers close to the embryo (e.g. due to the EOS, including from evaporation of pebbles) are not important for the final accretion rates. (x) The accretion rates for particles is observed to scale linearly with particle size, different than for unperturbed shear flow conditions, where it scales as s2/3 (Ormel & Klahr 2010; Lambrechts & Johansen 2012, 2014). We attribute the steepening of the power-law to aerodynamic deflection of well-coupled particles under the higher densities and very different flow patterns in our simulations relative to unper- turbed shear flow conditions. (xi) We find that the accretion rate of 0.3 -- 1 cm parti- cles for an 0.95 M⊕ embryo immersed in a 1/10 MMSN disk, assuming a dust-to-gas ratio of 0.01 and assuming that the dust has settled to a midplane layer with height H < RH, is about 2 10−5 M⊕yr−1. Since the accretion rates scale es- sentially linearly with particle size and inversely with gas MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Figure 21. Free fall drag velocities of particles of size 1 cm (blue), 0.1 cm (green), 0.01 cm (red) and 0.001 cm (cyan). The velocity dispersion of the m095t10-conv run is shown in magenta. ative to the gas continues, and since the convective motions do not result in a net transport of mass, their effect on the particle drift is a second-order effect. It is possible, however, that this could change if the convective motions were suf- ficiently resolved and included more turbulent, small-scale motions. The effect on the particle accretion rate is also likely to increase, and possibly become quite significant, when ac- cretion heating is included self-consistently by including ra- diative energy transfer and a realistic EOS. The resulting, self-consistent accretion rates are likely to be lower than the current values, but the convective motions are likely to be stronger than in our current, nominal case. 7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we have reported the results from high resolu- tion, nested grid, 3D hydrodynamic and particle simulations which focus on solid accretion onto Mars- to Earth-mass planetary embryos. The primary goals of this work were to establish realistic three-dimensional flow patterns inside and outside the Hill sphere, to use these to determine accurate accretion rates, and to investigate how the accretion rates depend on embryo mass, pebble size, and other factors. Our excellent spatial resolution and efficient time in- tegration, using locally determined time steps, made it possible -- using only a single, 20-core compute node per run -- to perform the first-ever simulations of pebble accre- tion covering scales from several disk scale heights to a few percent of a planet radius, including atmospheres that self- consistently connect to a surrounding accretion disk. It is also the first time that accretion heating driven convection has been modelled in a domain with such a large dynamic range. We conducted a series of simulations with different plan- etary embryo masses and strengths of a pressure trap. To be able to accurately measure accretion rates, and to study how they are affected by convection, we injected millions of macro-particles with representative sizes ranging from 10 micron to 1 m. The motion of the particles were fol- lowed, taking into account drag forces relative to the gas, Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 19 tening of the hydrostatic structure inside the Hill sphere could lead to the formation of a circumplanetary disk with prograde rotation (cf. Johansen & Lacerda 2010). In order to model such an evolution, it is crucial to realistically in- clude the major sources of heating, energy transport, and cooling: Accretion heating, the resulting convection, and ra- diative cooling while also using a realistic EOS (e.g. Tomida et al. 2013; cf. Fig. 1) and opacities. To this end, we are currently conducting simulations that include these effects. In the future, we will also model the accretion heating in a manner consistent with the solid accretion rate (cf. Sect. 6) and include pebble destruction via ablation (e.g. Brouwers et al. 2017; Alibert 2017). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the anonymous referee for in-depth and helpful comments that have helped to significantly im- prove the quality of this manuscript. The work of AP and AN was supported by grant 1323-00199B from the Dan- ish Council for Independent Research (DFF). CWO is sup- ported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Re- search (NWO; VIDI project 639.042.422). The Centre for Star and Planet Formation is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF97). Storage and computing re- sources at the University of Copenhagen HPC centre, funded in part by Villum Fonden (VKR023406), were used to carry out the simulations presented here. The authors are grateful to Kengo Tomida and Yasunori Hori, who kindly provided the tabular EOS. AP is grateful to the Anton Pannekoek Institute at the University of Amsterdam for a three month stay during which part of this work was carried out. This research made use of the YT project for analysis and visu- alisation (Turk et al. 2011). density, the accretion rate for the same size particles would be essentially the same in higher density disks; the larger supply of solids in a denser disk will tend to be cancelled by a correspondingly slower accretion speed. (xii) For our 1/10 MMSN solar mass disk, the accretion rate saturates (no longer increases with particles size) for particles larger than about 1 m, while for denser disks the particles can be even larger. Thus, only for such large par- ticle sizes will the accretion rates onto an embryo increase with the disk surface density. Conversely, if mm-size pebbles dominate the mass budget, the accretion rates depend only weakly on the disk surface density. Having such a high spatial resolution means that we could only cover a limited parameter space and run the sim- ulations for a relatively small number of orbital periods. We have also relied on an ideal gas EOS, while in reality the high temperatures near the embryo surface would lead to the dissociation of molecular hydrogen (e.g. D'Angelo & Bo- denheimer 2013), and therefore result in a much denser and somewhat cooler inner atmosphere. This would not signifi- cantly alter the accretion efficiency of the larger particles, however, as these effects occur at small radii from which these particles are not able to escape. Given the accretion rates determined in Section 5.3, we can estimate the growth time scales from low mass seeds to full planets, under the specified conditions (i.e. a gas surface density of 170 g cm−3, a dust-to-gas ratio of 0.01, and solids from within H < RH. As per the results discussed above, to lowest order, the effects of disk density on mass supply and accretion speed cancel. The remaining dominant scaling is the dependence on embryo mass, which is approximately M2/3, corresponding to a mass that grows approximately as t3. This implies that, as long as this approximate scaling persists, growth from a small seed takes on the order of three times the instantaneous mass divided by the instantaneous accretion rate. We conclude that if growth from low mass embryos to full size planets is dominated by accretion of 0.3 -- 1 cm size particles, the accretion from a low mass seed would have taken of the order of 0.15 million years in the case of Earth, and of the order of 0.1 million years in the case of Mars. With chondrule size particles -- if we take them to be 0.3-1 mm -- the growth times are 10 times longer. These estimates assume a local ratio of dust-to-gas surface densities of 0.01. Increased dust-to-gas ratios, e.g., due to radial accumulation of solids in a pressure trap, would lead to correspondingly reduced accretion times. During the growth phase, embryos would inevitably be surrounded by hot, primordial atmospheres of much larger mass than the current day atmospheres of the rocky Solar System planets. The decrease in disk densities required to stop pebble accretion would also result in removal of much of the primordial atmosphere as it expanded to match the decreasing pressure at its outer boundary (Nordlund 2011; Schlichting et al. 2015; Ginzburg et al. 2016). The isotopic signatures present in noble gases in the Earth's atmosphere may provide indirect evidence related to this (Pepin 1991, 1992a,b). A decrease in gas and dust densities will lead to in- creased rates of radiative cooling, at first dominated by cool- ing in the vertical direction. The consequential, gradual flat- MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) 20 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel REFERENCES ALMA Partnership et al., 2015, ApJ, 808, L3 Alibert Y., 2017, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 606, A69 Andrews S. M., et al., 2016, ApJ, 820, L40 Bell C. P. M., Naylor T., Mayne N. J., Jeffries R. D., Littlefair S. P., 2013, MNRAS, 434, 806 Bitsch B., Johansen A., Lambrechts M., Morbidelli A., 2015a, A&A, 575, A28 Bitsch B., Lambrechts M., Johansen A., 2015b, A&A, 582, A112 Bizzarro M., Connelly J. N., Krot A. N., 2017, in Pessah M., Gressel O., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 445, Astrophysics and Space Science Library. p. 161, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60609-5 6 Bollard J., et al., 2017, Science Advances, 3, e1700407 Brouwers M. G., Vazan A., Ormel C. W., 2017, preprint, 1708, arXiv:1708.05392 Casassus S., et al., 2013, Nature, 493, 191 Cassan A., et al., 2012, Nature, 481, 167 Chatterjee S., Tan J. C., 2014, ApJ, 780, 53 Cimerman N. P., Kuiper R., Ormel C. W., 2017, MNRAS, 471, 4662 D'Angelo G., Bodenheimer P., 2013, ApJ, 778, 77 Dehnen W., Read J. I., 2011, European Physical Journal Plus, 126, 55 Ebisuzaki T., Imaeda Y., 2017, New Astron., 54, 7 Friedrich J. M., Weisberg M. K., Ebel D. S., Biltz A. E., Corbett B. M., Iotzov I. V., Khan W. S., Wolman M. D., 2015, Chemie der Erde / Geochemistry, 75, 419 Fung J., Artymowicz P., Wu Y., 2015, ApJ, 811, 101 Ginzburg S., Schlichting H. E., Sari R., 2016, ApJ, 825, 29 Greenberg R., Hartmann W. K., Chapman C. R., Wacker J. F., 1978, Icarus, 35, 1 Guillot T., Ida S., Ormel C. W., 2014, A&A, 572, A72 Hayashi C., 1981, in Sugimoto D., Lamb D. Q., Schramm D. N., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 93, Fundamental Problems in the Theory of Stellar Evolution. pp 113 -- 126 Hubickyj O., Bodenheimer P., Lissauer J. J., 2005, Icarus, 179, 415 Ida S., Makino J., 1993, Icarus, 106, 210 Inaba S., Ikoma M., 2003, A&A, 410, 711 Isella A., P´erez L. M., Carpenter J. M., Ricci L., Andrews S., Rosenfeld K., 2013, ApJ, 775, 30 Johansen A., Lacerda P., 2010, MNRAS, 404, 475 Johansen A., Mac Low M.-M., Lacerda P., Bizzarro M., 2015, Science Advances, 1, 1500109 Kokubo E., Ida S., 1998, Icarus, 131, 171 Kritsuk A. G., et al., 2011, ApJ, 737, 13 Lambrechts M., Johansen A., 2012, A&A, 544, A32 Lambrechts M., Johansen A., 2014, A&A, 572, A107 Lambrechts M., Lega E., 2017, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 606, A146 Levison H. F., Thommes E., Duncan M. J., 2010, AJ, 139, 1297 Lommen D., Maddison S. T., Wright C. M., van Dishoeck E. F., Wilner D. J., Bourke T. L., 2009, A&A, 495, 869 Masset F. S., Ben´ıtez-Llambay P., 2016, ApJ, 817, 19 Meru F., Juh´asz A., Ilee J. D., Clarke C. J., Rosotti G. P., Booth R. A., 2017, ApJ, 839, L24 Morbidelli A., Nesvorny D., 2012, A&A, 546, A18 Nordlund A., 2011, in Sozzetti A., Lattanzi M. G., Boss A. P., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 276, The Astrophysics of Planetary Systems: Formation, Structure, and Dynamical Evolution. pp 105 -- 112, doi:10.1017/S1743921311020023 Nordlund A., Galsgaard K., Stein R. F., 1994, in Rutten R. J., Schrijver C. J., eds, NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series C Vol. 433, NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series C. p. 471 Nordlund A., Ramsey J. P., Popovas A., Kuffmeier M., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1705.10774) Ormel C. W., 2017, in Pessah M., Gressel O., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 445, Astrophysics and Space Science Library. p. 197, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60609-5 7 Ormel C. W., Klahr H. H., 2010, A&A, 520, A43 Ormel C. W., Kuiper R., Shi J.-M., 2015a, MNRAS, 446, 1026 Ormel C. W., Shi J.-M., Kuiper R., 2015b, MNRAS, 447, 3512 Ormel C. W., Liu B., Schoonenberg D., 2017, A&A, 604, A1 Paardekooper S.-J., Mellema G., 2006, A&A, 453, 1129 Pepin R. O., 1991, Icarus, 92, 2 Pepin R. O., 1992a, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sci- ences, 20, 389 Pepin R. O., 1992b, in Luhmann J. G., Jakosky B. M., eds, LPI Contributions Vol. 787, Evolution of the Martian Atmosphere. Piso A.-M. A., Youdin A. N., Murray-Clay R. A., 2015, ApJ, 800, 82 Pollack J. B., Hubickyj O., Bodenheimer P., Lissauer J. J., Podolak M., Greenzweig Y., 1996, Icarus, 124, 62 Rein H., Lesur G., Leinhardt Z. M., 2010, A&A, 511, A69 Rubanenko L., Steinberg E., Schlichting H., Paige D. A., 2017, in AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #49. p. 413.01 Schlichting H. E., Sari R., Yalinewich A., 2015, Icarus, 247, 81 Sellentin E., Ramsey J. P., Windmark F., Dullemond C. P., 2013, A&A, 560, A96 Stevenson D. J., 1982, Planet. Space Sci., 30, 755 Tan J. C., Chatterjee S., Hu X., Zhu Z., Mohanty S., 2016, IAU Focus Meeting, 29, 6 Testi L., Natta A., Shepherd D. S., Wilner D. J., 2003, A&A, 403, 323 Tomida K., Hori Y., 2016, personal communication Tomida K., Tomisaka K., Matsumoto T., Hori Y., Okuzumi S., Machida M. N., Saigo K., 2013, ApJ, 763, 6 Turk M. J., Smith B. D., Oishi J. S., Skory S., Skillman S. W., Abel T., Norman M. L., 2011, The Astrophysical Journal Sup- plement Series, 192, 9 Visser R. G., Ormel C. W., 2016, A&A, 586, A66 Weidenschilling S. J., 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57 Whipple F. L., 1972, in Elvius A., ed., From Plasma to Planet. p. 211 Xu Z., Bai X.-N., Murray-Clay R. A., 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 847, 52 Zeng L., Sasselov D. D., Jacobsen S. B., 2016, ApJ, 819, 127 de Val-Borro M., et al., 2006, MNRAS, 370, 529 van der Marel N., et al., 2013, Science, 340, 1199 APPENDIX A: ADDITIONAL FIGURES Fig. A1 shows the details of the gas flow in the m05t00 run for the M = 0.5 M⊕ planetary embryo. The similarity with the higher mass case is apparently because embryos of such masses have well established primordial atmospheres, which are very close to being hydrostatic, leading to very similar flows in the vicinity of the Hill sphere. Fig. A2 shows the mass accretion rates over the course of the m05t10 run. The accretion rates are about a factor of two lower than in the m095t10 case, and the preferred accretion paths through the Hill sphere are once again closer to the midplane and the stagnation points (separators). Fig. A3 shows the mass accretion rates over the course of the m01t10 run. Note that the contour levels are modi- fied, in order to enhance the features. The simulation shows a similar scenario to the cases with higher mass embryos, ex- cept the mass accretion rates are once again smaller. Also, there is effectively no loss of mass from RB. This is because MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 21 (a) Midplane. (b) z = 10 RP. (c) z = 25 RP. (d) z = 75 RP. (e) Vertical component of the vorticity in the midplane. (f) xz slice of the vertical velocity component at y = 0. Figure A1. Same as in Fig. 6, but for the M=0.5 M⊕ embryo from the m05t00 run. the RB for such a small mass embryo is just ∼12.3 embryo radii, or just 4% of RH, and therefore actually deeper in the potential well of the embryo than in the higher mass cases. This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) 22 A. Popovas, A. Nordlund, J. P. Ramsey, C. W. Ormel Figure A2. Same as Fig. 14, but for the m05t10 run. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018) Pebble dynamics and accretion onto rocky planets. 23 Figure A3. Same as Fig. 14, but for the m01t10 run. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 21 (2018)
1707.03345	1	1707	2017-07-11T16:15:53	The GTC exoplanet transit spectroscopy survey. VII. An optical transmission spectrum of WASP-48b	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We obtained long-slit optical spectroscopy of one transit of WASP-48b with the Optical System for Imaging and low-Intermediate-Resolution Integrated Spectroscopy (OSIRIS) spectrograph at the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC). We integrated the spectrum of WASP-48 and one reference star in several channels with different wavelength ranges, creating numerous color light curves of the transit. We fit analytic transit curves to the data taking into account the systematic effects present in the time series in an effort to measure the change of the planet-to-star radius ratio ($R_p/R_s$) across wavelength. After removing the transit model and systematic trends to the curves we reached precisions between 261 ppm and 455-755 ppm for the white and spectroscopic light curves, respectively. We obtained $R_p/R_s$ uncertainty values between $0.8 \times 10^{-3}$ and $1.5\times 10^{-3}$ for all the curves analyzed in this work. The measured transit depth for the curves made by integrating the wavelength range between 530 nm and 905 nm is in agreement with previous studies. We report a relatively flat transmission spectrum for WASP-48b with no statistical significant detection of atmospheric species, although the theoretical models that fit the data more closely include of TiO and VO.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. GTC_Wasp48 August 29, 2018 c(cid:13)ESO 2018 7 1 0 2 l u J 1 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 5 4 3 3 0 . 7 0 7 1 : v i X r a The GTC exoplanet transit spectroscopy survey VII An optical transmission spectrum of WASP-48b F. Murgas1,2,3,4, E. Pallé1,2, H. Parviainen1,2, G. Chen1,2,7, L. Nortmann1,2, G. Nowak1,2, A. Cabrera-Lavers1,5, and N. Iro6 1 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 2 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 3 Univ. Grenoble Alpes, IPAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France 4 CNRS, IPAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France 5 Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC), E-38712, Breña Baja, La Palma, Spain 6 Theoretical Meteorology group, Klimacampus, University of Hamburg, Grindelberg 5, 20144 Hamburg, Germany 7 Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China Received 04 April 2017/ Accepted 22 June 2017 ABSTRACT Context. Transiting planets offer an excellent opportunity for characterizing the atmospheres of extrasolar planets under very different conditions from those found in our solar system. Aims. We are currently carrying out a ground-based survey to obtain the transmission spectra of several extrasolar planets using the 10 m Gran Telescopio Canarias. In this paper we investigate the extrasolar planet WASP-48b, a hot Jupiter orbiting around an F-type star with a period of 2.14 days. Methods. We obtained long-slit optical spectroscopy of one transit of WASP-48b with the Optical System for Imaging and low- Intermediate-Resolution Integrated Spectroscopy (OSIRIS) spectrograph. We integrated the spectrum of WASP-48 and one reference star in several channels with different wavelength ranges, creating numerous color light curves of the transit. We fit analytic transit curves to the data taking into account the systematic effects present in the time series in an effort to measure the change of the planet- to-star radius ratio (Rp/Rs) across wavelength. The change in transit depth can be compared with atmosphere models to infer the presence of particular atomic or molecular compounds in the atmosphere of WASP-48b. Results. After removing the transit model and systematic trends to the curves we reached precisions between 261 ppm and 455-755 ppm for the white and spectroscopic light curves, respectively. We obtained Rp/Rs uncertainty values between 0.8×10−3 and 1.5×10−3 for all the curves analyzed in this work. The measured transit depth for the curves made by integrating the wavelength range between 530 nm and 905 nm is in agreement with previous studies. We report a relatively flat transmission spectrum for WASP-48b with no statistical significant detection of atmospheric species, although the theoretical models that fit the data more closely include of TiO and VO. Key words. planetary systems -- techniques: spectroscopy -- planets and satellites: atmospheres 1. Introduction With more than 2700 confirmed transiting extrasolar planets1 and many unconfirmed candidates, the characterization of their atmospheres through transmission spectroscopy has become an active subfield in exoplanetary studies. Although the first de- tection of elements using transmission spectroscopy were made from space (e.g., Charbonneau et al. 2002, Vidal-Madjar et al. 2004, Lecavelier Des Etangs et al. 2008, Désert et al. 2009), ground-based telescopes and instruments are also able to achieve the high precision measurements required by this technique. Indeed, after the first space-based discoveries of atoms and molecules in extrasolar planets, many ground-based observa- tions followed (e.g., Snellen et al. 2008, Redfield et al. 2008, Bean et al. 2011, Sing et al. 2012, Bean et al. 2013) and at present there are several efforts to continue the characterization of exo- planetary atmospheres from the ground. We are currently carrying out a transmission spectroscopy survey to characterize the atmospheres of transiting planets using 1 http://exoplanet.eu/catalog/ long-slit spectroscopy with the 10.4 m telescope Gran Telesco- pio Canarias (GTC). The principle of transmission spectroscopy is to measure the change in the planetary radius at different wave- lengths during a transit event, and to use this change to infer the presence of particular components of the exoplanet atmosphere. Because of their relatively big atmospheric scale heights, hot Jupiters are excellent targets for atmospheric detection from the ground and they are the main targets of our survey (e.g., Murgas et al. 2014, Parviainen et al. 2016, Pallé et al. 2016, Nortmann et al. 2016, Chen et al. 2017). The hot Jupiter WASP-48b was discovered by Enoch et al. (2011) as part of the Wide Angle Search for Planets (WASP, Pollacco et al. 2006). Its host star is a slightly evolved F star with an apparent magnitude of V = 11.72 ± 0.14 mag, a mass of M = 1.19 ± 0.05 M(cid:12), a stellar radius of R = 1.75 ± 0.09 R(cid:12), and an effective temperature of Te f f = 6000 ± 150 K. Enoch et al. (2011) measured a planetary mass of M = 0.98 ± 0.09 MJup, a radius of R = 1.67 ± 0.10 RJup, and an orbital period of 2.14 days. Sada et al. (2012) measured a planet-to-star ra- dius ratio in the J band of Rp/Rs = 0.0988+0.0051 −0.0049, which agrees Article number, page 1 of 8 A&A proofs: manuscript no. GTC_Wasp48 with the value reported in the discovery paper by Enoch et al. (2011) (Rp/Rs = 0.0980 ± 0.001). O'Rourke et al. (2014) used Spitzer to measure the secondary transit of WASP-48b in the H, Ks, 3.6 µm, and 4.5 µm bands. For the dayside emission spectra they fitted a blackbody model with an effective temperature of Te f f = 2158 ± 100 K. Using the models of Fortney et al. (2008) and Burrows et al. (2008) to fit their data, they deduced that WASP-48b has a weak or absent temperature inversion. Ciceri et al. (2015) presents a follow up of this system using multicolor broadband photometry; this work updated the stellar parameters of WASP-48 (M = 1.062 ± 0.074 M(cid:12), R = 1.519 ± 0.007 R(cid:12)), measured a smaller planetary radius (R = 1.396 ± 0.051 RJup), and found a flat transmission spectrum using broadband filters. Turner et al. (2016) presents ground-based near-UV data of sev- eral transiting systems including WASP-48b, and found a Rp/Rs for the U band of 0.0916± 0.0017, a shallower transit depth than the one found by Enoch et al. (2011). This paper is organized as follows. In §2 and §3 we describe the observations and data reduction, in §4 we describe the light curve fitting process, and in §5 we show the transmission spec- trum of WASP-48b. Finally, in §6 we present a discussion of the results and in §7 the conclusions of this paper. 2. Observations The GTC is a 10.4 m telescope located at Observatorio Roque de los Muchachos in La Palma, Spain. For the observations, the Op- tical System for Imaging and low-Resolution-Integrated Spec- troscopy (OSIRIS, Cepa et al. 2000) in its long-slit spectroscopic mode was chosen. The data were taken on July 17, 2014; the binning was set to 2 × 2; the readout speed of OSIRIS was chosen to be 200 KHz with a gain of 0.95 e−/ADU; and readout noise of 4.5 e−. The observations were made using the R1000R grism (spectral cov- erage of λ ∼ 520 − 1040 nm) and with a custom built slit with a width of 40 arcsec. The use of a wide slit minimizes the system- atic effects that may appear due to flux losses caused by seeing variations during the observations. The exposure time was set to 15 seconds, thus assuring a high signal-to-noise ratio below the saturation level of the detector. Close to 50 minutes of data be- fore and after the transit were collected; the total time of data acquisition was 5 hours, which translated into 552 science im- ages. During the observations, the airmass varied from 1.32 to 1.22 (minimum airmass of 1.19, maximum telescope elevation angle was 63.2◦). During the transit of WASP-48b, OSIRIS was able to obtain spectra for the target and four reference stars (Figure 1) simul- taneously. Because of its low brightness, three of the stars were not suitable to be used as reference and were discarded from the analysis. All the results presented here were produced using the flux of the star R1 as reference (see Table 1). The universal time of data acquisition was determined us- ing the recorded headers of the images. The opening and closing time of the shutter was used to compute the time of mid expo- sure. Then, using the code written by Eastman et al. (2010)2, the mid exposure time was converted to the Barycentric Julian Date in Barycentric Dynamical Time (BJD_TDB). All the re- sults present here were produced using BJD as the time standard. 2 http://astroutils.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/time/ Article number, page 2 of 8 Fig. 1. GTC OSIRIS image through the slit (top) and calibrated science image (bottom). In this image, the target is the star labeled T and the selected reference star is labeled R1. Other reference stars in the field (R2, R3, and R4) are marked, but were not used in the data analysis due to their faint magnitude. 3. Data reduction The raw data were calibrated using standard procedures. With the calibration images provided by the GTC team, we proceeded to create an average bias using 32 images. We requested a large number of flats in order to have a good estimation of the pixel sensitivy of OSIRIS; the flat field calibration set was composed of 100 images that were combined after subtracting the average bias. The master flat was then normalized by fitting (including rejection of deviant pixels) a high degree Chebyshev polynomial to the flux across the dispersion axis. Following Murgas et al. (2014), the extraction and wave- length calibration of the spectra was done using a customized PyRAF script that calls different IRAF3 tasks that work with long-slit spectroscopic data. A fixed aperture size of 20 pixels in width (5.08 arcsec) was used to extract the spectra. This aper- ture width was chosen after determining which one delivered the lowest scatter in the out-of-transit points in the white light curve (wavelength range integrated between 530-905 nm). In order to correct for drifts along the dispersion axis, the cross-correlation between the first image and the rest of the time series for each star was computed with IRAF's task FXCOR. This process was repeated between the target and the reference star. Additionally, a Gaussian function was fitted to the spectral profile of each star in the time series to monitor drifts perpendicular to the disper- sion axis. The computed full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the spatial profile for each star was used in the fitting procedure as a proxy of the seeing variations observed during the transit. An example of the extracted spectrum and wavelength coverage of GTC R1000R grism can be seen in Figure 2. 3 IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. CCD 10100200300400500600700800Pixel0500100015002000PixelTR1R2R3R4F. Murgas et al.: The GTC exoplanet transit spectroscopy survey VII Table 1. Observed stars. Star 2MASS name WASP-48 R1 J19243895+5528233 J19243079+5527485 RA (FK5) DEC (FK5) 19h 24m 38.984s +55◦ 28m 23.39s 19h 24m 30.787s +55◦ 27m 48.52s B (mag) V (mag) K (mag) 10.37 12.31 11.99 10.45 11.65 11.44 905 nm), and 6 curves made with a bin size of 10 nm (covering the spectral region 564.5 nm - 624.5 nm). Figure 3 presents the flux of WASP-48, the reference star R1, and the flux ratio between the target and R1 for the white light curve. The plot shows clearly that variations in the flux of the tar- get and reference star were present during the observations, but they are mostly corrected by the differential photometry. How- ever, there are some residual systematic effects still present in the light curve which need to be taken into account in the fitting procedure in order to have a robust error estimation. 4.1. Model selection As in Nortmann et al. (2016), the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) was used to select the best light curve model. The BIC penalizes a high χ2 value and/or the number of free parameters used in the fitting procedure; the model that presents the lowest BIC is the one selected. The BIC values for three models were computed for 16 light curves produced using a bin size of 25 nm of width covering a wavelength range between 530 nm and 905 nm. The following models were tested: M1 = T (p)(a0 + b1t + c0Fw), M2 = T (p)(a0 + b1t + c0Fw + c1Fw2), (1) (2) M3 = T (p)(a0 + b1t + b2t2 + c0Fw), (3) where T (p) is the transit model and p are the transit dependent parameters, t is the time of the observations, and Fw is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the spectrum profile. All the tested models present a synthetic transit model with a time de- pendency to reproduce a second-order color effect not corrected by the differential photometry, and a FWHM dependent poly- nomial to model the systematic effects produced by seeing vari- ations. The FWHM correction was introduced because seeing variations affected the number of pixels in which the major part of the stellar flux is contained, and this pixel-dependent effect will act as a systematic correlated with FWHM (see Nortmann et al. 2016, Chen et al. 2017). With a slit 40 arcsec in width, the flux losses produced by not being able to measure the flux con- tained in the wings of the spectral profile are negligible. Other possible sources for the systematic effects were tested (e.g., po- sition of the stars, telescope rotation angle as in Nortmann et al. 2016, etc.), but no strong correlation was found and they were discarded as parameters for the tested models. As shown in Figure 4 no model was selected unanimously; for each curve created there were some bins that preferred a model (i.e., lowest BIC value) that did not get the majority of preferences. Since a unique model that presented the lowest BIC value for all the curves evaluated in this test could not be found, the function that provided the lowest BIC values at the highest rate was selected; in this case Model 1. Using a model with a Article number, page 3 of 8 Fig. 2. Extracted R1000R grism spectrum of WASP-48 (red) and its reference star (blue). The spectra are not corrected for instrumental re- sponse or flux calibrated. The shaded gray areas indicate the custom 25 nm passbands used to create the spectroscopic light curves. The broad- band filters V, R, I, and z − sloan are also plotted in an arbitrary scale to show the wavelength coverage of the spectrum. Fig. 3. Individual light curves of the target and reference star (R1). In addition, the flux ratio between the target and the reference star is plot- ted for the white light curve. The fluxes are normalized to the first data point of the time series and with an arbitrary offset in the y-axis. 4. Light curve fitting To create the light curves, the spectra of the target and reference star were integrated in different wavelength ranges and with dif- ferent bin sizes. Then, the integrated flux of the target was di- vided by the flux of the reference star. The curves created and analyzed in this work are as follows: 1 white light curve (flux integrated between 530 nm and 905 nm), 15 curves using a bin size of 25 nm (between 530 nm and 5006007008009001000Wavelength (nm)0.00.51.01.52.0Flux (counts ×105)VRIzWASP-48R10.400.450.500.550.600.65BJD - 2456856.0 (days)0.960.970.980.991.001.011.021.031.04Normalized FluxTargetR1T/R1A&A proofs: manuscript no. GTC_Wasp48 Table 2. Transit parameters uniform prior ranges. Transit Parameter Uniform prior range Tc − 2456856 [days] [0.512256, 0.533096] Rp/Rs u1 u2 a/Rs i [deg] [0.03, 0.15] [−1.0, 1.0] [−1.0, 1.0] [3.2, 5.8] [75, 90] hood of the curves is given by the comparison between the data and the transit model plus the systematic trends (see Eq. 1), and it was computed together with red noise estimation using Gaussian processes with a simple exponential kernel (the George package for Python, Ambikasaran et al. 2014). The likelihood of the limb darkening coefficients was computed using PyLDTK and it pro- vides a more robust way of establishing the coefficient values instead of the traditional approach of using tables (Parviainen et al. (2016)). Only uniform priors were used for the parameters fitted in this work (see Table 2 for the transit parameters priors). The fitting procedure was split in three stages. First, we per- formed a global optimization of F = lnL + ln Priors, i.e., the likelihood weighted by the priors, using PyDE6. The second part of the process consisted in running a small MCMC (60 inde- pendent chains, 10000 iterations) as a burn-in period, using the global optimization results as a seed. Finally, we used the pa- rameter vector that delivered the highest F value from stage 2 as a starting point to generate 250 independent chains and ran the MCMC procedure for 11500 iterations using emcee. After this process was over, the autocorrelation length in the chains was calculated in order to avoid strongly correlated parameter val- ues in the posterior probability distribution. The final values and uncertainties were obtained by computing the percentiles of the distributions to get the median and 1σ limits for each parameter. Following Parviainen et al. (2016), the two red noise param- eters used to describe the exponential kernel (the amplitude and time scale), where computed for the white light curve and fixed for the rest of the curves (i.e., the 25 nm and 10 nm bins). 5. Results 5.1. White light curve The white light curve and best fitted model are shown in Fig- ure 5. The peak-to-peak RMS of the residuals (middle panel of Fig. 5) is 261 ppm. The fitted transit parameters and their cor- responding 1σ uncertainties are listed in Table 3. The measured planet-to-star radius ratio agrees with a shallower transit than the reported values by Enoch et al. (2011) (Rp/Rs = 0.098 ± 0.001) and Sada et al. (2012) (Rp/Rs = 0.0988+0.0051 −0.0049); we speculate that the reason for this discrepancy could be due to spots in the stellar surface. 5.2. Transmission spectrum The transmission spectrum of WASP-48b was obtained by mea- suring the change of transit depth across wavelength. Figure 6 shows the time series and best fitted model for the curves made using an integration bin of 25 nm of width. Table 4 presents the measured planet-to-star radius ratio and 1σ uncertainties for each bin. For all the curves analyzed in this work, the uncertain- ties in the planet-to-star radius ratio range between 0.8×10−3 and 6 https://github.com/hpparvi/pyde Fig. 4. Frequency of the minimum BIC values for each proposed model. The model that presents the lowest BIC is the one selected. The BIC values were computed using curves created by integrating the flux of the stars using bins of 25 nm in width. high number of parameters increases the risk of overfitting the data; however, for most of the bins where the BIC was evalu- ated the numerical difference between Models 1, 2, and 3 was not significant. 4.2. Fitting procedure In order to produce the synthetic light curves, we used the curve generator code PyTransit4 (Parviainen 2015). This code presents optimized Python routines that implement the Giménez (2006) transit models. For the transit curves, a quadratic limb darkening law was adopted. The limb darkening coefficients were modeled using the Python Limb Darkening Tool Kit (PyLDTK5; Parviainen & Aigrain 2015), this package uses Husser et al. (2013) stellar li- braries to compute the coefficients using custom passbands. The stellar parameters used as input for PyLDTK were taken from the discovery paper of WASP-48b by Enoch et al. (2011): Te f f = 6000 ± 150 K, log g = 4.50 ± 0.15, and [Fe/H] = −0.12 ± 0.12. For each curve, we set the following transit parameters as free: the planet-to-star radius ratio Rp/Rs, the quadratic limb darkening coefficients u1 and u2, the central time of transit Tc, the orbital semi-major axis over stellar radius a/Rs, and the or- bital inclination i. The orbital eccentricity and period were fixed to 0 and 2.14363544 days (Ciceri et al. 2015), respectively. In addition to the free transit parameters, we also set as free the co- efficients used to model the systematic trends present in the light curves. In order to estimate robustly the values of the modeled pa- rameters, a Bayesian fitting process was used. The procedure de- scribed here is similar to the one presented in Parviainen et al. (2016). A likelihood function was evaluated iteratively using the Python MCMC suite emcee (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2013). The likelihood function was given by: lnL = lnLcurve + lnLLD, (4) where Lcurve is the likelihood of the transit light curve and LLD is the likelihood of the limb darkening coefficients. The likeli- 4 https://github.com/hpparvi/PyTransit 5 https://github.com/hpparvi/ldtk Article number, page 4 of 8 Model 1Model 2Model 30246810121416FrequencyBIC minimum valueFilters 25nmF. Murgas et al.: The GTC exoplanet transit spectroscopy survey VII Table 4. Measured Rp/Rs for the 25 nm light curves. Center (nm) 542.5 567.5 592.5 617.5 642.5 667.5 692.5 717.5 742.5 767.5 792.5 817.5 842.5 867.5 892.5 Rp/Rs 0.09357 ± 0.00128 0.09301 ± 0.00126 0.09301 ± 0.00105 0.09311 ± 0.00117 0.09277 ± 0.00104 0.09292 ± 0.00098 0.09352 ± 0.00103 0.09307 ± 0.00102 0.09301 ± 0.00094 0.09290 ± 0.00102 0.09220 ± 0.00097 0.09249 ± 0.00090 0.09171 ± 0.00097 0.09165 ± 0.00103 0.09082 ± 0.00089 Table 5. Measured Rp/Rs for the 10 nm light curves. Center (nm) 569.5 579.5 589.5 599.5 609.5 619.5 Rp/Rs 0.09186 ± 0.00144 0.09278 ± 0.00142 0.09249 ± 0.00136 0.09394 ± 0.00122 0.09227 ± 0.00147 0.09378 ± 0.00128 To analyze our transmission spectrum results, we computed theoretical atmosphere models using Exo-Transmit (Kempton et al. 2016). With this code, we created three cloud-free mod- els with solar composition using an isothermal temperature pro- file and including Rayleigh scattering, but varying the atmo- spheric composition. In particular, we computed three models: i) a model atmosphere with TiO and VO, ii) a model atmosphere with VO (no TiO), and iii) a model atmosphere with no TiO and no VO. 5.3. Refractory element signatures The curves made with a bin size of 10 nm were used to put con- straints on the presence of sodium in the atmosphere of WASP- 48b. This bin size was chosen to cover the Na i 589.0 and 589.6 nm doublet (Murgas et al. 2014). The bins near the Na doublet (left and right of the bin cen- tered at the wavelength of the line) were used to compute a weighted mean Rp/Rs in order to employ them as a continuum level to see whether there was an extra absorption at the line core. We calculated a continuum level of Rp/Rs = 0.09340 ± 0.00093, Avg (cid:16) (cid:16) (cid:17) (cid:17) (cid:16) Na (cid:17) while the planet-to-star radius ratio at the Na doublet is Rp/Rs = 0.09249 ± 0.00136. The difference between the line and continuum Rp/Rs is ∆ Rp/Rs = −0.00091 ± 0.03694, Avg−Na meaning that we do not have a statistically significant detection of sodium. Article number, page 5 of 8 (6) (7) (8) Fig. 5. GTC/OSIRIS WASP-48b white light transit curve. The red points present the observed time series and the blue points show the light curve after removing the systematic effects and red noise compo- nent. The black line represents the best fit determined using our MCMC analysis. The black dots at the bottom are the residuals of the best fit with an arbitrary offset. Table 3. MCMC results of the white light transit curve of WASP-48b. Tc − 2456856 [days] Parameter Rp/Rs u1 u2 a/Rs i [deg] e Value 0.09330 ± 0.00088 0.43583 ± 0.00183 0.14877 ± 0.00466 0.522666(234) 4.763 ± 0.079 82.474 ± 0.336 0 (Fixed) 1.5× 10−3, while the standard deviations of normalized residuals vary between 261 ppm for the white light curve, and 455-755 ppm for spectroscopic light curves. The expected photon noise for the white light curve is 63 ppm and for the spectroscopic light curves it is in the range of 213-373 ppm, meaning that the measured noise level of the white light and spectroscopic curves is close to 4 and 2 times the expected photon noise level, respec- tively. Figure 7 presents the transmission spectrum of WASP-48b. In this figure the gray shadowed region corresponds to ±3 at- mospheric scale heights (H). One scale height is the distance in which the atmospheric pressure decreases by a factor e (Euler's number) and is given by H = kBT p µgp , (5) where kb is the Boltzmann constant, µ is the mean molecular weight, T p is the temperature of the planet, and gp is the planet's surface gravity. The atmospheric scale for WASP-48b is H = 614.9 km (using µ = 2.3 times the proton mass, T p = 2000 K, and gp = 11.5 m/s2 taken from Ciceri et al. 2015). 0.400.450.500.550.600.65BJD - 2456856.0 (days)0.9850.9900.9951.0001.0051.0101.015Relative Fluxσ=261.3 ppmObservedCorrectedA&A proofs: manuscript no. GTC_Wasp48 Fig. 6. Light curves obtained using the filters of 25 nm of width for WASP48-b. Left panel: Observed light curves and best fit (black line). Right panel: Transit light curves after removing systematic effects and best fit (black line). At our resolution the potassium doublet (λ 766.48 nm and 769.89 nm) is blended with some atmospheric telluric lines, thus making a detection of an excess in the transit depth difficult due to imperfect telluric correction (Parviainen et al. 2016). In this work none of the curves analyzed here presents a significant ex- cess in the transit depth for the bins centered in this line. For the future, the use of a higher resolution grism could help resolve the blended lines and help improve the telluric correction near the K doublet. 6. Discussion Several planetary atmosphere models, supported by observations of low mass stars, predict the presence of TiO and VO in hot Jupiters (Seager & Sasselov 1998, Hubeny et al. 2003, Bur- rows et al. 2007). Moreover, TiO has been proposed as the ab- sorber responsible for the temperature inversion layer observed in some transiting gas giants (Fortney et al. 2008). In optical wavelengths, Désert et al. (2008) reported a detection of TiO and VO in the atmosphere of HD 209458b, which is supported by previous albedo measurements for this planet made by Rowe et al. (2006). Hoeijmakers et al. (2015) searched for the signa- ture of TiO in HD 209458b using cross-correlation techniques applied to high resolution spectra, finding no statistically sig- Article number, page 6 of 8 nificant detection of TiO, although they pointed out that their technique depends on the accuracy of TiO line lists used to gen- erate synthetic planet spectrum. A more recently discovered exo- planet with tentative detection of TiO and VO in the optical is the highly inflated WASP-127b (Lam et al. 2017, Palle et al. 2017), although more conclusive studies need to be made. The detection of TiO and VO molecules in the optical is difficult because their features are thought to be relatively broad and of low amplitude, in addition the presence of hazes in the planetary atmospheres can affect the strength of the features (Pont et al. 2013, Kreid- berg et al. 2014, Burrows 2014 and references therein). O'Rourke et al. (2014) measured the secondary transit of WASP-48b in the infrared (H, Ks, 3.6 µm, and 4.5 µm bands). By comparing their data to the models of Fortney et al. (2008) and Burrows et al. (2008), they deduced that WASP-48b has a weak or absent temperature inversion and moderate day-night energy circulation. The model that presented the best fit was one with- out TiO, but models with a more efficient day-night circulation and including TiO could also provide a reasonably close match to the data. Using χ2 statistics to fit the models to the observed transmis- sion spectrum, we found that the preferred atmosphere model was the one including TiO and VO (top panel in Fig. 7) with a reduced chi square of χ2 r = 0.32 (15 degrees of freedom); for 0.400.450.500.550.600.65BJD - 2456856.0 (days)0.880.900.920.940.960.981.001.021.04Relative Flux542.5 nm567.5 nm592.5 nm617.5 nm642.5 nm667.5 nm692.5 nm717.5 nm742.5 nm767.5 nm792.5 nm817.5 nm842.5 nm867.5 nm892.5 nm0.400.450.500.550.600.65BJD - 2456856.0 (days)σ=465.5 ppmσ=461.6 ppmσ=455.7 ppmσ=471.0 ppmσ=461.6 ppmσ=487.7 ppmσ=489.4 ppmσ=516.2 ppmσ=494.4 ppmσ=556.9 ppmσ=559.4 ppmσ=588.6 ppmσ=622.5 ppmσ=678.3 ppmσ=754.7 ppmF. Murgas et al.: The GTC exoplanet transit spectroscopy survey VII Fig. 7. Transmission spectrum of WASP-48b. The solid lines are atmosphere models computed with Exo-Transmit for a WASP-48b analog with Teq = 2000 K, isothermal temperature profile, and Rayleigh scattering by H2 in the blue. The dashed gray line represent the Rp/Rs found for the white light curve and the shaded area is ±3 atmospheric scale heights (H = 614.9 km) above and below this level. comparison a straight line model gave χ2 r = 0.59. For the full observed wavelength range, the model including TiO and VO presented a lower χ2 r value, although it is not statistically sig- nificant to be differentiated from a featureless spectrum, i.e, a flat line. The model with only VO and the model without TiO and VO, had a reduced chi square of χ2 r = 2.27, respectively. r = 0.85 and χ2 After 710 nm the large-scale structure of the TiO bands has a decreasing slope (e.g., Sharp & Burrows 2007, Fortney et al. 2010), which coincides with the change in slope in the observed transmission spectrum. We divided the transmission spectrum in two regions: bins with λ < 710 nm and bins with λ ≥ 710 nm, and we performed a simple linear fit for both re- gions. The measured slope in the region with λ < 710 was con- sistent with a flat line (slope value of (−0.320 ± 8.545) × 10−6), while the bins with λ ≥ 710 nm presented a fitted slope value of (−12.57 ± 5.94) × 10−6. Although our data seems to show two regions with different slopes, the spectral resolution and un- certainties of the observed transmission spectrum of WASP-48b does not allow us to claim a detection of TiO and VO. 7. Conclusions We present here an analysis of a primary transit of WASP-48b taken with GTC/OSIRIS instrument. Using a time series of long- slit spectra of WASP-48 and one reference star, we created sev- eral color light curves in order to explore the change in transit depth across wavelength. In this work we analyzed 1 white light curve (wavelength range 530-905 nm), 15 curves of 25 nm in width (wavelength range 530-905 nm), and 6 curves of 10 nm (wavelength range 564.5-624.5 nm). All the curves were fitted using a Bayesian MCMC procedure using a transit model with a quadratic limb darkening law and reproducing the systematic effects present in the curves. The uncertainties reported in this work take into ac- count time correlated noise of unknown origin (red noise) com- puted using Gaussian processes. We report a flat, featureless transmission spectrum confirm- ing previous broadband observations. The obtained transmission spectrum agrees with the expected cloud-free theoretical atmo- sphere model that includes the presence of TiO and VO, although evidence of these molecules in the atmosphere of WASP-48b is not statistically significant enough to claim a detection. Explor- Article number, page 7 of 8 0.0900.0920.0940.0960.098Rp/Rs1xsolar TiO VO0.0900.0920.0940.0960.098Rp/Rs1xsolar VO500550600650700750800850900950Wavelength (nm)0.0880.0900.0920.0940.0960.098Rp/Rs1xsolar No TiO VOA&A proofs: manuscript no. GTC_Wasp48 Lam, K. W. F., Faedi, F., Brown, D. J. A., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A3 Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Pont, F., Vidal-Madjar, A., & Sing, D. 2008, A&A, 481, L83 Murgas, F., Pallé, E., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A41 Nortmann, L., Pallé, E., Murgas, F., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A65 O'Rourke, J. G., Knutson, H. A., Zhao, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 109 Pallé, E., Chen, G., Alonso, R., et al. 2016, A&A, 589, A62 Palle, E., Chen, G., Prieto-Arranz, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 602, L15 Parviainen, H. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3233 Parviainen, H. & Aigrain, S. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 3821 Parviainen, H., Pallé, E., Nortmann, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A114 Pollacco, D. L., Skillen, I., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2006, PASP, 118, 1407 Pont, F., Sing, D. K., Gibson, N. P., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2917 Redfield, S., Endl, M., Cochran, W. D., & Koesterke, L. 2008, ApJ, 673, L87 Rowe, J. F., Matthews, J. M., Seager, S., et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 1241 Sada, P. V., Deming, D., Jennings, D. E., et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 212 Seager, S. & Sasselov, D. D. 1998, ApJ, 502, L157 Sharp, C. M. & Burrows, A. 2007, ApJS, 168, 140 Sing, D. K., Huitson, C. M., Lopez-Morales, M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1663 Snellen, I. A. G., Albrecht, S., de Mooij, E. J. W., & Le Poole, R. S. 2008, A&A, Turner, J. D., Pearson, K. A., Biddle, L. I., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 789 Vidal-Madjar, A., Désert, J.-M., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., et al. 2004, ApJ, 604, 487, 357 L69 Fig. 8. Transmission spectrum of WASP-48b around the Na doublet. The blue, red, and green lines show atmosphere models computed us- ing Exo-Transmit for a WASP-48b analog with Teq = 2000 K, isother- mal temperature profile, and Rayleigh scattering by H2 in the blue. The dashed black line represent the Rp/Rs found for the white light curve and ±3 atmospheric scale heights (H = 614.9 km) above and below this level. ing the wavelength region near the Na i doublet (λ 589.0 and 589.6 nm), we found no statistically significant detection of this element. Acknowledgements. Based on observations made with the Gran Telescopio Ca- narias (GTC), installed in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, in the island of La Palma. All the fig- ures presented here were made using Matplotlib (Hunter 2007). References Ambikasaran, S., Foreman-Mackey, D., Greengard, L., Hogg, D. W., & O'Neil, M. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1403.6015] Bean, J. L., Désert, J.-M., Kabath, P., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 92 Bean, J. L., Désert, J.-M., Seifahrt, A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 771, 108 Burrows, A., Budaj, J., & Hubeny, I. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1436 Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., Budaj, J., Knutson, H. A., & Charbonneau, D. 2007, ApJ, 668, L171 Burrows, A. S. 2014, Nature, 513, 345 Cepa, J., Aguiar, M., Escalera, V. G., et al. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4008, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. M. Iye & A. F. Moorwood, 623 -- 631 Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Noyes, R. W., & Gilliland, R. L. 2002, ApJ, Chen, G., Pallé, E., Nortmann, L., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, L11 Ciceri, S., Mancini, L., Southworth, J., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A54 Désert, J.-M., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Hébrard, G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 478 Désert, J.-M., Vidal-Madjar, A., Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., et al. 2008, A&A, Eastman, J., Siverd, R., & Gaudi, B. S. 2010, PASP, 122, 935 Enoch, B., Anderson, D. R., Barros, S. C. C., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 86 Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, Fortney, J. J., Lodders, K., Marley, M. S., & Freedman, R. S. 2008, ApJ, 678, 568, 377 492, 585 306 1419 Fortney, J. J., Shabram, M., Showman, A. P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 1396 Giménez, A. 2006, A&A, 450, 1231 Hoeijmakers, H. J., de Kok, R. J., Snellen, I. A. G., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A20 Hubeny, I., Burrows, A., & Sudarsky, D. 2003, ApJ, 594, 1011 Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90 Husser, T.-O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A6 Kempton, E. M.-R., Lupu, R. E., Owusu-Asare, A., Slough, P., & Cale, B. 2016, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1611.03871] Kreidberg, L., Bean, J. L., Désert, J.-M., et al. 2014, Nature, 505, 69 Article number, page 8 of 8 560570580590600610620630Wavelength (nm)0.0880.0900.0920.0940.0960.0980.100Rp/Rs1xsolar TiO VO1xsolar VO1xsolar No TiO VO
1603.00414	1	1603	2016-03-01T19:19:09	On the origin of the sub-Jovian desert in the orbital-period--planetary-mass plane	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Transit and radial velocity observations indicate a dearth of sub-Jupiter--mass planets on short-period orbits, outlined roughly by two oppositely sloped lines in the period--mass plane. We interpret this feature in terms of high-eccentricity migration of planets that arrive in the vicinity of the Roche limit, where their orbits are tidally circularized, long after the dispersal of their natal disk. We demonstrate that the two distinct segments of the boundary are a direct consequence of the different slopes of the empirical mass--radius relation for small and large planets, and show that this relation also fixes the mass coordinate of the intersection point. The period coordinate of this point, as well as the detailed shape of the lower boundary, can be reproduced with a plausible choice of a key parameter in the underlying migration model. The detailed shape of the upper boundary, on the other hand, is determined by the post-circularization tidal exchange of angular momentum with the star and can be reproduced with a stellar tidal quality factor $Q^\prime_*\sim10^6$.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version August 27, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 6 1 0 2 r a M 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 4 1 4 0 0 . 3 0 6 1 : v i X r a ON THE ORIGIN OF THE SUB-JOVIAN DESERT IN THE ORBITAL-PERIOD -- PLANETARY-MASS PLANE Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics and The Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA Titos Matsakos and Arieh Konigl Draft version August 27, 2018 ABSTRACT Transit and radial velocity observations indicate a dearth of sub-Jupiter -- mass planets on short- period orbits, outlined roughly by two oppositely sloped lines in the period -- mass plane. We interpret this feature in terms of high-eccentricity migration of planets that arrive in the vicinity of the Roche limit, where their orbits are tidally circularized, long after the dispersal of their natal disk. We demonstrate that the two distinct segments of the boundary are a direct consequence of the different slopes of the empirical mass -- radius relation for small and large planets, and show that this relation also fixes the mass coordinate of the intersection point. The period coordinate of this point, as well as the detailed shape of the lower boundary, can be reproduced with a plausible choice of a key parameter in the underlying migration model. The detailed shape of the upper boundary, on the other hand, is determined by the post-circularization tidal exchange of angular momentum with the star and can be reproduced with a stellar tidal quality factor Q′ Subject headings: planet-star interactions -- planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability ∗ ∼ 106. -- planets and satellites: general 1. INTRODUCTION As has been known for some time now, radial-velocity surveys of exoplanets exhibit an abrupt drop in the num- ber of hot Jupiters (HJs) for orbital periods Porb . 3 days (e.g., Cumming et al. 2008), corresponding to a pileup of such planets near Porb = 3 days (e.g., Gaudi et al. 2005) and their paucity at shorter peri- ods (e.g., Zucker & Mazeh 2002). (We define HJs as planets that have masses in the range Mp ∼ 0.3 -- 3 MJ, where MJ is Jupiter's mass, and periods Porb . 10 days.) Planet candidates identified by transit measurements exhibit a similar sharp drop in the number count be- low Porb ∼ 3 -- 4 days for objects with radii Rp & 4 R⊕ (e.g., Howard et al. 2012; Fressin et al. 2013). One in- terpretation of these results invokes planet -- planet scat- tering events that place one of the interacting planets on a highly eccentric orbit: that planet thereby attains a small pericenter distance, where its orbit is circular- ized through tidal interaction with the host star (e.g., Ford & Rasio 2006). In this picture, the shortest possible pericenter distance is given by the Roche limit aR, where the planet starts to be tidally disrupted, and the planet's resulting circular radius must therefore exceed ∼ 2 aR (where the factor of 2 follows from conservation of orbital angular momentum). A planet can also be placed on a highly eccentric orbit by a more gradual process such as Kozai (e.g., Wu & Murray 2003; Fabrycky & Tremaine 2007) or secular (e.g., Wu & Lithwick 2011; Petrovich 2015a) migration. An alternative interpretation at- tributes the scarcity of high-Mp planets on short-period orbits to tidal exchange of angular momentum with the star, which causes close-in giant planets to spiral inward and get ingested by their host (e.g., Jackson et al. 2009; Teitler & Konigl 2014). As data continued to accumulate, more details have emerged about the structure of the planet distribution at low values of Porb. In particular, Szab´o & Kiss (2011) considered the (Porb, Mp) plane and identified a region (defined by Porb < 2.5 days and Mp between 0.02 and 0.8 MJ) with a pronounced dearth of planets, which they termed the "sub-Jupiter desert."1 They noted that this region has both an upper boundary, consisting of HJs, and a lower boundary, consisting of close-in super-Earths (SEs), but is devoid of hot Neptunes. Similar identi- fications were made by Beaug´e & Nesvorn´y (2013) and by Mazeh et al. (2016) (with the latter authors approxi- mating the boundary by two intersecting straight lines in the (log Porb, log Mp) plane), and it is generally accepted that this feature is not the result of some observational bias.2 However, the origin of the desert is still being de- bated (e.g., Szab´o & Kiss 2011; Ben´ıtez-Llambay et al. 2011; Beaug´e & Nesvorn´y 2013; Kurokawa & Nakamoto 2014; Batygin et al. 2016; Mazeh et al. 2016). In one proposed scenario (Kurokawa & Nakamoto 2014), the desert is attributed to the evaporation of close-in giant planets by the stellar radiation field, followed by Roche- lobe overflow. However, this picture also implies the com- plete loss of the gaseous envelopes of the less massive SEs, which is inconsistent with the fact that the inferred radii of the planets near the lower boundary of the desert are generally well in excess of 1.6 R⊕ and are thus unlikely to be purely rocky (see Rogers 2015). In an alternative scenario (Valsecchi et al. 2014, 2015), HJs arrive at the Roche limit and undergo rapid mass loss through Roche- lobe overflow, with photoevaporation further contribut- ing to the removal of their envelopes. It was proposed that this mechanism could convert HJs into SEs, but it is not obvious that the resulting low-mass planet distribu- 1 As discussed in that paper as well as in the other studies of this topic that we cite, a complementary description of the sub- Jovian desert can be given in the (Porb, Rp) plane. However, in view of the degeneracy of the Mp(Rp) relation for large planets (see Equation (1) below), we consider only the (Porb, Mp) plane in this work. 2 In fact, several planets are known to lie inside the nominal desert, although so far all such planets are located near the desert's edges (e.g., Col´on et al. 2015). 2 Matsakos & Konigl tion would be consistent with the observed shape of the desert's lower boundary. Yet another possibility is that the desert arises from the in-situ formation of HJs by gas accretion onto SE cores (Boley et al. 2016; Batygin et al. 2016). However, this picture also faces various challenges (e.g., Inamdar & Schlichting 2015). In this Letter we propose that the boundary of the desert reflects the locus of the innermost circularized or- bits of planets that arrived in the vicinity of the host star through planet-planet scattering, Kozai migration (aris- ing from an interaction with either a stellar or a plane- tary companion), or a secular process long after the pro- toplanetary disk had dispersed. As was already pointed out by Ford & Rasio (2006), the Roche limit aR (which is taken to be the distance of closest approach for a planet arriving via either scattering or Kozai migration) is a function of both Rp and Mp (for a given host mass M∗), and it can therefore be expressed (using the appropriate mass -- radius relation) as a function of Mp. A similar ex- pression can be written down for the expected distance of closest approach in the secular chaos scenario. Using an empirical Rp(Mp) relation, we demonstrate that this picture can account for the basic shape of the desert's boundary, with its oppositely sloped upper and lower segments. We further show that the detailed structure of the boundary can be qualitatively reproduced when one also takes into account the orbital evolution induced in close-in planets by their tidal interaction with the host star. These results on the behavior of late-arriving close- in planets complement recent inferences about the evo- lution of an earlier generation of HJs that had migrated though the natal disk (Matsakos & Konigl 2015). 2. MODELING APPROACH pP 13/3 p , where Q′ orb MpR−5 Since most of the planets in the vicinity of the desert's boundary are inferred to have low eccentricities (e < 0.1; see Figure 1 below), we focus on scenarios in which plan- ets are placed on high-eccentricity orbits that are cir- cularized by internal tidal dissipation after the planets arrive in the vicinity of the host star. For any given system, we label by tarr the time at which the planet under consideration arrives at the stellar vicinity with orbital eccentricity e0. After arrival, its orbit is circular- ized to a radius ac (where its orbital period is Porb) on a timescale τc ∝ Q′ p is the planet's tidal quality factor (e.g., Matsumura et al. 2010a). Plan- ets along the lower boundary of the desert have low values of Rp, which has the effect of increasing τc. However, the smallest such planets would be mostly rocky and would thus also have low values of Q′ p (e.g., Goldreich & Soter 1966), so their orbits might still be circularized over the planets' typical ages (tage & 1 Gyr). In this work we relate Rp and Mp through the empirical relation ob- tained by Weiss et al. (2013). They divided their sam- ple into small and large planets (superscripts S and L, respectively), separated at Mp ≈ 150 M⊕, and wrote down power-law relationships that we further approxi- mate here by adopting the median incident flux of the data set (F = 8.6 × 108 erg s−1 cm−2) and rounding to the first decimal figure in each exponent: star The tidal ∗/Q′ interaction with the can also ingestion by lead to orbital decay and eventual This occurs on a nominal timescale the host. p)(M∗/Mp)2(Rp/R∗)5] τc (where an aster- τd ∼ [(Q′ isk again denotes the star), which is typically ≫ τc (e.g., Matsumura et al. 2010a). Given that τd ∝ 1/Mp, the planets on the lower boundary of the desert are hardly affected by this interaction; however, the initial period distribution of the circularized orbits of large planets is measurably modified. 2.1. Initial Locus of Innermost Planets with Circularized Orbits The post-circularization locus in the (Porb, Mp) plane of the lowest-Porb planets can be obtained for both the planet -- planet scattering and Kozai migration cases from the expression for the Roche limit (RL), aR = q (M∗/Mp)1/3 Rp , (2) where the precise value of the coefficient q depends on the planet's structural and orbital characteristics. Two of the most frequently cited estimates are q = 2.16 (Paczy´nski 1971) and q = 2.7 (Guillochon et al. 2011), but there are indications that its value in real systems could be higher (up to ∼ 3.6 -- 3.8; Valsecchi & Rasio 2014; Petrovich 2015b). As it turns out, the interpre- tation of the sub-Jovian desert in terms of the Roche limit also favors a comparatively large value for q (≃ 3.5; see Section 3). Under the assumption that e0 ≈ 1, the circularization radius is ≃ 2 aR and thus can be written as ac,RL ≈ 0.03 (cid:16) q 3(cid:17)(cid:18) M∗ M⊙(cid:19)1/3(cid:18) Mp MJ(cid:19)−1/3(cid:18) Rp RJ(cid:19) AU . (3) In the secular chaos (SC) model, the circularization radius was estimated by Wu & Lithwick (2011) as twice the pericenter distance obtained by equating the preces- sion rate of a planet's longitude of pericenter -- due to a secular interaction with another planet located farther out -- with the orbit-averaged precession rate due to the tidal quadrupole induced on the planet by the star. This yields ac,SC ≈ 0.03(cid:18) α × (cid:18) Mp 1/6(cid:19)−3/5(cid:18) M∗ MJ(cid:19)−1/5(cid:18) Rp M⊙(cid:19)2/5(cid:18) Mpert RJ(cid:19) AU , MJ (cid:19)−1/5 (4) where Mpert is the mass of the perturbing planet and α is the ratio of the semimajor axes of the two planets. For the sake of simplicity, we henceforth fix α at its nor- malization value and treat Mpert as the relevant model parameter.3 By combining Equations (1), (3), and (4), and using , we obtain the initial (post circularization) Porb ∝ a−3/2 c RS p RJ ∼ 1.6 (cid:18) Mp MJ(cid:19)1/2 , RL p RJ MJ(cid:19)0 ∼ 1.5 (cid:18) Mp . (1) 3 An alternative possibility would have been to treat the pa- rameter combination α3Mpert as a variable. Origin of Sub-Jovian Desert 3 TABLE 1 Model Parameters Parameter Sampled Value Distribution Number of planets Porb [days] Rp [R⊕] for Rp < 12R⊕ Mp [M⊕] for Rp < 12R⊕ Rp [M⊕] for Rp > 12R⊕ Mp [M⊕] for Rp > 12R⊕ tarr [Gyr] 5 0.5 -- 50a 3 -- 12a 9 -- 144b 9 -- 20b 56 -- 5620b 0.01 -- 10 f (ln P ) ∝ P 0.47 f (ln R) ∝ R−0.66 (Rp/R⊕)2M⊕ Fit to data Fit to data Uniform in log time References. -- a Youdin (2011); b Weiss et al. (2013). locus of the innermost planets for these two scenarios, orb,SC ∝ M −3/5 orb,SC ∝ M 3/20 P S orb,RL ∝ M −1/2 orb,RL ∝ M 1/4 P S RL :( P L SC :( P L p p p p , . (5) It is seen that in both cases the inferred boundary has a negatively sloped upper branch and a positively sloped lower branch. This basic property of the observed sub- Jovian desert is a generic feature of our proposed inter- pretation, arising from the different slopes in the empir- ical Rp(Mp) relation for large and small planets. 2.2. Effect of Tidally Induced Orbital Evolution We calculate this effect following the procedure out- lined in Matsakos & Konigl (2015). We perform Monte Carlo simulations for a population of 30,000 plane- tary systems, assuming solar-type hosts (M∗ = M⊙, R∗ = R⊙) with initial rotation periods distributed uni- formly in the range 5 -- 10 days, and drawing ages in the range 1 -- 8 Gyr from the empirical distribution of ∗ = 106 Walkowicz & Basri (2013). We also adopt Q′ (see Section 3). The values of Porb and Rp are chosen from the observationally inferred distributions presented in Youdin (2011), with Mp deduced from the Rp(Mp) compilation of Weiss et al. (2013) (using their inferred power-law fit for small planets but accounting for the observed scatter in both radius and mass for those with Mp & 150 M⊕).4 We further assume a random distribu- tion for the initial angle between the stellar spin and the orbital plane, and that the distribution of planet arrival times is uniform in log tarr (see Section 4). These choices are summarized in Table 1. For each system, we integrate the evolution equations for the stellar and orbital angular momenta, taking into account the effects of equilibrium tides and of magnetic braking. We assume that all orbits in a multi-planet sys- tem remain coplanar, but we neglect planet -- planet in- teractions. We carry out the calculations for each of the two distributions obtained in Section 2.1, removing from consideration any planet drawn with an initial semima- jor axis that is less than ac,RL (Equation (3)) or ac,SC (Equation (4)). Given that we do not include systems with tage ≤ 1 Gyr in our population counts, our pre- 4 The adopted distributions of Porb and Rp are in the form of a single power law and thus do not capture the detailed behavior of planets in this region of the period -- mass plane. However, since our focus is on the shape of the desert's boundary and not on reproducing the observed density of planets, we do not consider more elaborate distributions. dicted distributions do not reveal the possible presence of close-in giant planets that arrive at the stellar vicin- ity by migration through the natal disk. The contribu- tion of such early-arriving planets to the observed num- ber count is, however, small due to their relatively rapid tidal ingestion by the star. Nevertheless, as was noted by Matsakos & Konigl (2015), these HJs could have a strong influence on the observed distribution of the an- gle between the stellar spin and the orbital plane. Based on that work, we take account of this effect by including, at time t = 0, a "stranded HJ" (SHJ) characterized by MSHJ = 0.6 MJ, RSHJ = RJ, and PSHJ = 2 days in (ran- domly selected) 50% of the modeled systems. A giant planet of this type would undergo tidal ingestion by a G-type star on a timescale of ∼ 0.7 Gyr. 3. RESULTS Figure 1 presents the predicted distributions in the (Porb, log Mp) plane for the RL and SC models. For the RL model we also plot the relation obtained from combining Equations (1) and (3) for three values of the parameter q,5 whereas for the SC model we show the cor- responding relation obtained from Equations (1) and (4) for three values of Mpert.6 It is seen that each of these scenarios can reproduce the observed shape of the sub- Jovian desert's boundary quite well. The initial circular- ization locus accounts for the basic "bird's beak" configu- ration of the boundary, but only the shape of its low-mass segment (along which orbital evolution effects are negli- gible) and the location of the vertex (where the upper and lower segments intersect) are preserved in the final distribution. The mass coordinate of the vertex is fixed by the transition point (Mp ≈ 150 M⊕) of the empirical mass -- radius relation and is independent of the details of the underlying planet migration model; the fact that it matches the observations so accurately is a strong indica- tion that this aspect of the small/large planets dichotomy plays a key role in determining the desert's shape. On the other hand, the plots in the left panels of Figure 1 demonstrate that the period coordinate of the vertex is sensitive to the value of the relevant model parameter. In each case, however, the inferred best-fit value has a plau- sible magnitude. In the RL picture, the comparatively large indicated value of q (≃ 3.5) is consistent with other recent determinations (e.g., Valsecchi & Rasio 2014, who derived the initial locations of HJs detected inside the Roche limit; and Petrovich 2015b, who investigated the formation of HJs by Kozai migration). In the case of secular chaos, the inference that Mpert ≈ Mp is also em- inently reasonable. For Jupiter-mass planets, the exci- tation of secular interactions would be much weaker if the companion planet's mass were measurably less than that of the innermost planet (e.g., Wu & Lithwick 2011), whereas for SE planets, comparable-mass objects are the most frequent companions and are thus the most likely to act as perturbers. Note that the value of the model parameter (q or Mpert) also affects the predicted shape of 5 The values 2.16 and 2.70 represent the estimates listed in Section 2.1, whereas q = 3.46 corresponds to our best fit to the desert's shape. 6 In deriving these relations, we use the power-law scalings listed in Equation (1) for small and large planets, and divide the two populations at the value of Mp (≃ 150 M⊕) given in Weiss et al. (2013). 4 ] J M [ s s a m t e n a p l ] J M [ s s a m t e n a p l Matsakos & Konigl ROCHE LIMIT MODEL model data, initial Eqs. (1) & (3): q =3.46 Eqs. (1) & (3): q =2.70 Eqs. (1) & (3): q =2.16 ] J M [ s s a m t e n a p l ROCHE LIMIT MODEL model data, final obs. data: e < 0.1 obs. data: e > 0.1 obs. data: e n/a sub-Jovian desert 101 100 10-1 101 100 10-1 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.5 2.0 3.5 orbital period [days] 3.0 4.0 4.5 5.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.5 2.0 3.5 orbital period [days] 3.0 4.0 4.5 5.0 model data, initial Eqs. (1) & (4): Mpert =Mp Eqs. (1) & (4): Mpert =2Mp Eqs. (1) & (4): Mpert =MJ/2 SECULAR CHAOS MODEL ] J M [ s s a m t e n a p l SECULAR CHAOS MODEL model data, final obs. data: e < 0.1 obs. data: e > 0.1 obs. data: e n/a sub-Jovian desert 101 100 10-1 101 100 10-1 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.5 2.0 3.5 orbital period [days] 3.0 4.0 4.5 5.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.5 2.0 3.5 orbital period [days] 3.0 4.0 4.5 5.0 Fig. 1. -- Predicted vs. observed planet distributions in the (Porb, log Mp) plane. The top panels correspond to the Roche limit model for the innermost circularized orbits (applicable to planets arriving at the stellar vicinity through either scattering or Kozai migration), whereas the bottom panels correspond to the secular migration model. For each of these two cases, the left and right panels show, respectively, the initial distribution of planets on circular orbits and the final distribution obtained by calculating the effect of tidally induced orbital evolution. The initial planet distribution in the left panels was obtained by sampling empirical distributions of the orbital period, planetary radius, and system age as well as the adopted arrival-time distribution and the empirical Rp(Mp) relation (see Table 1). Analytic predictions for the inner edge of this distribution are also shown in each case in the left panel for several values of the relevant model parameter. The data shown in the right panels are for all confirmed planets listed in exolanets.org (Han et al. 2014) as of 2015 December 16, and are color coded according to their eccentricity values (when available). To improve the presentation, the number of displayed low-mass model planets was randomly reduced by 95% in each of the panels. Origin of Sub-Jovian Desert 5 the lower branch of the desert's boundary, which further constrains the choice of the best match. The shape of the upper boundary is largely indepen- dent of the details of the initial distribution of high- mass planets, and is determined mainly by the ensu- ing orbital evolution. It is well reproduced -- in the con- text of the equilibrium tidal interaction model that we ∗ ∼ 106, employ -- with a stellar tidal quality factor Q′ which is consistent with previous inferences from mod- eling the Porb distribution of HJs (e.g., Teitler & Konigl 2014; Essick & Weinberg 2016). It is noteworthy that the two alternative models originally proposed to explain the spatial distribution of HJs -- circularization of highly eccentric orbits and tidal exchange of angular momen- tum with the star -- are both found to be relevant in the context of the current interpretation when the detailed distribution in the (Porb, Mp) plane is taken into account. 4. DISCUSSION Our proposed interpretation of the sub-Jovian desert's shape -- that it is a natural consequence of the orbital circularization of planets that arrive at the stellar vicin- ity on high-eccentricity orbits and of their subsequent tidal angular-momentum exchange with the star -- is con- sistent with the finding that the eccentricity distri- bution of giant planets broadens with increasing pe- riod (e.g., Winn & Fabrycky 2015) and with the evi- dence for ongoing orbital evolution of the innermost HJs (e.g., Valsecchi & Rasio 2014; Teitler & Konigl 2014; Essick & Weinberg 2016). The latter result, in turn, sup- ports the view that the observed HJs are mostly late- arriving planets rather than the product of migration in the protoplanetary disk. The high-eccentricity migra- tion scenario, in which the ingoing planet is placed on a high-e0 orbit through gravitational interaction with one or more massive bodies (other planets or a binary star), is consistent with the indicated high occurrence rate of planetary and stellar companions in systems that harbor HJs (e.g. Knutson et al. 2014; Ngo et al. 2015). We con- sidered three possible pathways to such an outcome -- planet-planet scattering, Kozai migration, and secular drift -- and inferred that in principle they could all play a role. However, a more detailed examination is required to determine the actual contribution of each of these pro- cesses. One pertinent question is whether the influence of the process extends to late times; for example, sec- ular chaos is inherently a long-lasting interaction, for which the expected distribution of arrival times is ap- proximately uniform in log tarr (Y. Lithwick, personal communication), whereas scattering likely only plays a role at early times (. 108 yr; e.g., Chatterjee et al. 2008; Juri´c & Tremaine 2008). Another relevant question con- cerns the rate of eccentricity growth in the high-e migra- tion model; for example, Wu & Lithwick (2011) argued that the observed ∼ 3-day pileup of HJs is more likely to have been caused by a slow process such as Kozai or secular migration than by sudden scattering events (see also Nagasawa et al. 2008). Further studies are needed to fully address this issue. One attractive feature of the proposed interpretation is that it can simultaneously reproduce both the up- per and the lower segments of the desert's boundary. An alternative possibility for the low-mass branch is that it arises from the in-situ formation of close-in SEs (Mazeh et al. 2016), which has been recently explored in the literature (e.g., Lee & Chiang 2016). However, arguments have also been given in favor of formation at larger distances (up to a few AU) and subsequent inward migration (e.g., Schlichting 2014; Inamdar & Schlichting 2015). Our model for the sub-Jovian desert is consistent with the latter picture. The scenario considered in this work, which involves late-arriving planets, complements the SHJs model pre- sented in Matsakos & Konigl (2015), which is concerned with early-arriving HJs. That model explains the good alignment exhibited by a significant fraction of HJs around cool (G type) stars -- as well as the good align- ment inferred for more distant planets around such stars -- vs. the broad range of obliquities exhibited by HJs around hot (F type) stars. As we noted in Sec- tion 2, the earlier population of HJs would not affect the observed properties of the sub-Jovian desert because of the relatively short SHJ ingestion time. However, consis- tency with the SHJs scenario requires the orbital plane of any late-arriving planet to roughly coincide with that of the natal disk. This additional constraint on the high- eccentricity migration model need not, however, be too difficult to fulfill. For example, Matsumura et al. (2010b) found that only ∼ 15% of planets in a 3-planet system that emerges out of a gas disk have orbital inclinations > 10◦, and Lithwick & Wu (2014) discovered that, even if larger initial inclinations are allowed, 60% of the HJs formed through secular migration involving a 3-planet system have projected obliquities < 10◦. Furthermore, Petrovich (2015a) demonstrated the feasibility of pro- ducing HJs through coplanar high-e migration (a secular process involving 2 planets). We are grateful to Tsevi Mazeh for alerting us to the "bird's beak" shape of the sub-Jovian desert's boundary. We thank him as well as Dan Fabrycky, Yoram Lith- wick, Leslie Rogers, and the referee for helpful input. This work was supported in part by NASA ATP grant NNX13AH56G. REFERENCES Batygin, K., Bodenheimer, P. H., & Laughlin, G. P. 2016, ApJ, Col´on, K. D., Morehead, R. C., & Ford, E. B. 2015, MNRAS, submitted, arXiv:1511.09157 Beaug´e, C., & Nesvorn´y, D. 2013, ApJ, 763, 12 Ben´ıtez-Llambay, P., Masset, F., & Beaug´e, C. 2011, A&A, 528, A2 Boley, A. C., Granados Contreras, A. P., & Gladman, B. 2016, ApJ, 817, L17 Chatterjee, S., Ford, E. B., Matsumura, S., & Rasio, F. A. 2008, ApJ, 686, 580 452, 3001 Cumming, A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2008, PASP, 120, 531 Essick, R., & Weinberg, N. N. 2016, ApJ, 816, 18 Fabrycky, D., & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298 Ford, E. B., & Rasio, F. A. 2006, ApJ, 638, L45 Fressin, F., Torres, G., Charbonneau, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 81 6 Matsakos & Konigl Gaudi, B. S., Seager, S., & Mallen-Ornelas, G. 2005, ApJ, 623, 472 Goldreich, P., & Soter, S. 1966, Icarus, 5, 375 Guillochon, J., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Lin, D. 2011, ApJ, 732, 74 Han, E., Wang, S. X., Wright, J. T., et al. 2014, PASP, 126, 827 Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2012, ApJS, 201, 15 Inamdar, N. K., & Schlichting, H. E. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1751 Jackson, B., Barnes, R., & Greenberg, R. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1357 Juri´c, M., & Tremaine, S. 2008, ApJ, 686, 603 Knutson, H. A., Fulton, B. J., Montet, B. T., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 126 Kurokawa, H., & Nakamoto, T. 2014, ApJ, 783, 54 Lee, E. J., & Chiang, E. 2016, ApJ, 817, 90 Lithwick, Y., & Wu, Y. 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 111, 12610 Matsakos, T., & Konigl, A. 2015, ApJ, 809, L20 Matsumura, S., Peale, S. J., & Rasio, F. A. 2010a, ApJ, 725, 1995 Matsumura, S., Thommes, E. W., Chatterjee, S., & Rasio, F. A. 2010b, ApJ, 714, 194 Mazeh, T., Holczer, T., & Faigler, S. 2016, A&A, submitted Nagasawa, M., Ida, S., & Bessho, T. 2008, ApJ, 678, 498 Ngo, H., Knutson, H. A., Hinkley, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 138 Paczy´nski, B. 1971, ARA&A, 9, 183 Petrovich, C. 2015a, ApJ, 805, 75 -- . 2015b, ApJ, 799, 27 Rogers, L. A. 2015, ApJ, 801, 41 Schlichting, H. E. 2014, ApJ, 795, L15 Szab´o, G. M., & Kiss, L. L. 2011, ApJ, 727, L44 Teitler, S., & Konigl, A. 2014, ApJ, 786, 139 Valsecchi, F., Rappaport, S., Rasio, F. A., Marchant, P., & Rogers, L. A. 2015, ApJ, 813, 101 Valsecchi, F., & Rasio, F. A. 2014, ApJ, 787, L9 Valsecchi, F., Rasio, F. A., & Steffen, J. H. 2014, ApJ, 793, L3 Walkowicz, L. M., & Basri, G. S. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 1883 Weiss, L. M., Marcy, G. W., Rowe, J. F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 14 Winn, J. N., & Fabrycky, D. C. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 409 Wu, Y., & Lithwick, Y. 2011, ApJ, 735, 109 Wu, Y., & Murray, N. 2003, ApJ, 589, 605 Youdin, A. N. 2011, ApJ, 742, 38 Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 2002, ApJ, 568, L113
1610.07632	1	1610	2016-10-24T20:12:23	Forward and Inverse Modeling of the Emission and Transmission Spectrum of GJ 436b: Investigating Metal Enrichment, Tidal Heating, and Clouds	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The Neptune-mass GJ 436b is one of the most-studied transiting exoplanets with repeated measurements of both its thermal emission and transmission spectra. We build on previous studies to answer outstanding questions about this planet, including its potentially high metallicity and tidal heating of its interior. We present new observations of GJ 436b's thermal emission at 3.6 and 4.5 micron, which reduce uncertainties in estimates of GJ 436b's flux at those wavelengths and demonstrate consistency between Spitzer observations spanning more than 7 years. We analyze the Spitzer thermal emission photometry and Hubble WFC3 transmission spectrum in tandem. We use a powerful dual-pronged modeling approach, comparing these data to both self-consistent and retrieval models. We vary the metallicity, intrinsic luminosity from tidal heating, disequilibrium chemistry, and heat redistribution. We also study the effect of clouds and photochemical hazes on the spectra, but do not find strong evidence for either. The self-consistent and retrieval modeling combine to suggest that GJ 436b has a high atmospheric metallicity, with best fits at or above several hundred times solar metallicity, tidal heating warming its interior with best-fit intrinsic effective effective temperatures around 300--350 K, and disequilibrium chemistry. High metal-enrichments (>600x solar) can only occur from the accretion of rocky, rather than icy, material. Assuming Tint~300--350 K, we find that Q'~2x10^5--10^6, larger than Neptune's Q', and implying a long tidal circularization timescale for the planet's orbit. We suggest that Neptune-mass planets may be a more diverse class than previously imagined, with metal-enhancements potentially spanning several orders of magnitude, to perhaps over 1000x solar metallicity. High fidelity observations with instruments like JWST will be critical for characterizing this diversity.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	DRAFT FOR APJ Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 FORWARD AND INVERSE MODELING OF THE EMISSION AND TRANSMISSION SPECTRUM OF GJ 436B: INVESTIGATING METAL ENRICHMENT, TIDAL HEATING, AND CLOUDS CAROLINE V. MORLEY1, 2, HEATHER KNUTSON3, MICHAEL LINE4, JONATHAN J. FORTNEY5, DANIEL THORNGREN6, MARK S. MARLEY7, DILLON TEAL5, ROXANA LUPU7 Draft for ApJ ABSTRACT The Neptune-mass GJ 436b is one of the most-studied transiting exoplanets with repeated measurements of both its thermal emission and transmission spectra. We build on previous studies to answer outstanding questions about this planet, including its potentially high metallicity and tidal heating of its interior. We present new observations of GJ 436b's thermal emission at 3.6 and 4.5 µm, which reduce uncertainties in estimates of GJ 436b's flux at those wavelengths and demonstrate consistency between Spitzer observations spanning more than 7 years. We analyze the Spitzer thermal emission photometry and Hubble WFC3 transmission spectrum in tandem. We use a powerful dual-pronged modeling approach, comparing these data to both self-consistent and retrieval models. We vary the metallicity, intrinsic luminosity from tidal heating, disequilibrium chemistry, and heat redistribution. We also study the effect of clouds and photochemical hazes on the spectra, but do not find strong evidence for either. The self-consistent and retrieval modeling combine to suggest that GJ 436b has a high atmospheric metallicity, with best fits at or above several hundred times solar metallicity, tidal heating warming its interior with best-fit intrinsic effective effective temperatures around 300–350 K, and disequilibrium chemistry. High metal-enrichments (> 600× solar) can only occur from the accretion of rocky, rather than icy, material. Assuming Tint∼300–350 K, we find that Q(cid:48) ∼ 2× 105–106, larger than Neptune's Q(cid:48), and implying a long tidal circularization timescale for the planet's orbit. We suggest that Neptune-mass planets may be a more diverse class than previously imagined, with metal-enhancements potentially spanning several orders of magnitude, to perhaps over 1000× solar metallicity. High fidelity observations with instruments like JWST will be critical for characterizing this diversity. Subject headings: keywords 1. INTRODUCTION Determining the compositions of exoplanets ranging from Earth-mass to Jupiter-mass in different environments is a key goal of exoplanetary research. Planetary compositions are shaped by the details of planet formation and altered by at- mospheric physics and chemistry. Over a decade after its dis- covery by Butler et al. (2004), GJ 436b remains the planet in its Neptune-mass class for which we have obtained the most detailed observations of its atmosphere. GJ 436b was discovered to transit by Gillon et al. (2007b) and, as the smallest transiting planet in 2007 and a favorable target for observations, immediately became a target for atmo- spheric characterization studies with the Spitzer Space Tele- scope and Hubble Space Telescope. It remains one of the most favorable and interesting targets for followup spectroscopic studies: to date a total of 18 secondary eclipses and 8 transits have been observed with Spitzer, along with 7 transits with HST (Deming et al. 2007; Demory et al. 2007; Gillon et al. 2007a; Stevenson et al. 2010; Beaulieu et al. 2011; Knutson et al. 2011, 2014a). The atmosphere of GJ 436b has been a perennial challenge 1 Department of Astronomy, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; [email protected] 6 Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz 7 NASA Ames Research Center 2 NASA Sagan Fellow 3 Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of 4 School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University 5 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Technology Santa Cruz to understand. Previous observations and modeling efforts, which we describe below, have suggested high metallicity compositions with strong vertical mixing. Many of these con- clusions rest on the robustness of the Spitzer 3.6 and 4.5 µm eclipses. Here, we move forward to study this planet us- ing both its thermal emission photometry and its transmission spectrum, adding three new eclipse observations at these two wavelengths and analyzing the dataset with a powerful dual- pronged approach of self-consistent and retrieval modeling. 1.1. Observations and Interpretation of Thermal Emission Secondary eclipse measurements allow us to infer the planet's brightness, and therefore temperature, as a function of wavelength when the planet passes behind the host star. A planet will appear fainter, and therefore create a shallower oc- cultation, at wavelengths of strong absorption features, and appear brighter at wavelengths of emission features. The first secondary eclipse measurements of GJ 436b were observed at 8 µm, while Spitzer was still operating cryogeni- cally (Deming et al. 2007; Demory et al. 2007). These obser- vations revealed that GJ 436b has a high eccentricity, ∼0.15, which, given predicted tidal circularization timescales, sug- gests the presence of a companion and of potential tidal heat- ing (Ribas et al. 2008; Batygin et al. 2009). With an equilibrium temperature around 700–800 K, GJ 436b is cool enough that models assuming thermochemical equilibrium predict high CH4 abundance and low CO and CO2 abundance, which would result in a deeper occultation at 4.5 µm than 3.6 µm. However, when Stevenson et al. (2010) pub- lished the first multi-wavelength thermal emission spectrum of GJ 436b, measuring photometric points at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, 2 16, and 24 µm, they found that its occultation was deeper at 3.6 µm and shallower at 4.5 µm and suggested methane deple- tion due to photo-dissociation as an explanation. Additional studies have reanalyzed these observations and observed ad- ditional secondary eclipses (Knutson et al. 2011; Lanotte et al. 2014). In particular, the analysis by Lanotte et al. (2014) revealed a significantly shallower 3.6 µm eclipse and some- what shallower 8.0 µm eclipse; no detailed atmospheric stud- ies have been carried out since these revisions. From the time of the initial observations of GJ 436b's ther- mal emission, it has been a major challenge to find self- consistent models that adequately explain the data. Mad- husudhan & Seager (2011) found using retrieval algorithms that the atmosphere is best fit by an atmosphere rich in CO and CO2 and depleted in CH4. Line et al. (2011) used dis- equilibrium chemical models including the effect of photo- chemistry, but found that they were not able to reproduce the low observed methane abundance. Moses et al. (2013) found that high metallicities (230–1000× solar) favor the high CO and CO2 abundances inferred from the observations. Agún- dez et al. (2014), noting the high eccentricity of GJ 436b, studied the effect of tidal heating deep in the atmosphere on the chemistry and find that significant tidal heating and high metallicities fit the observed photometry best. 1.2. Observations and Interpretation of Transmission Spectrum Wavelength-dependent observations of the transit depth of GJ 436b allow us to probe the composition of GJ 436b's day– night terminator. At wavelengths with strong absorption fea- tures, the planet will occult a larger area of the star, result- ing in a deeper transit depth. Pont et al. (2009) observed the transmission spectrum of GJ 436b from 1.1 to 1.9 µm with NICMOS on HST but due to systematic effects were unable to achieve high enough precision to detect the predicted water vapor feature. Beaulieu et al. (2011) presented transit mea- surements in Spitzer's 3.6, 4.5, and 8.0 µm filters that showed higher transit depths at 3.6 and 8.0 µm than at 4.5 µm, indi- cating strong methane absorption. Knutson et al. (2011) ana- lyzed the same data and suggested that variable stellar activity caused the observed transit depth at 3.6 µm to vary between epochs. However, these data were reanalyzed again by Lan- otte et al. (2014) and Morello et al. (2015) with new tech- niques, which both found that the transit depths were constant in the different bandpasses and remained constant between epochs of observations. More recently, Knutson et al. (2014a) used WFC3 on HST to measure the transmission spectrum from 1.1–1.7 µm. Like Pont et al. (2009), they do not detect a water vapor feature, but with their higher S/N spectrum are able to rule out a cloud- free H/He-dominated atmosphere to high confidence (48σ). The spectrum is consistent with a high cloud at pressures of ∼1 mbar, or a H/He poor (3% H/He by mass, 1900× solar) atmospheric composition. 1.3. A Third Body in the GJ 436 System? Because the tidal circularization timescales are predicted to be shorter than the age of the star, the non-zero eccen- tricity of GJ 436b has suggested that it may have at least one companion in the system; however, a number of searches for additional planets did not find additional bodies (Demory et al. 2007; Deming et al. 2007; Maness et al. 2007; Alonso et al. 2008; Ribas et al. 2008; Cáceres et al. 2009; Ballard et al. 2010b,a; Beust et al. 2012). Stevenson et al. (2012) an- nounced the detection of two candidate sub-Earth-size planets in the system, but later work by Lanotte et al. (2014) did not find any evidence of these candidate companions. 1.4. The Need for an Additional Atmospheric Study Is it Here, we build on this extensive history of both observa- tions and modeling for this enigmatic warm Neptune to an- swer the still-outstanding questions about this planet. Do the revisions in the eclipse points from Lanotte et al. (2014) change the inferred composition? truly ultra-high (>300× solar) metallicity? What atmospheric physics must be present for a Neptune-mass planet to have the observed spectra and inferred atmospheric composition? To these ends, we present an additional three secondary eclipse observations (1 at 3.6 µm, 2 at 4.5 µm), demonstrat- ing the robustness of these observations with modern Spitzer observational and analysis techniques. We study both the ther- mal emission and transmission spectra of GJ 436b in tandem, including the published dataset of Spitzer photometry span- ning from 3.6 to 16 µm and the transmission spectrum from HST/WFC3. Unlike most previous studies, we investigate whether including clouds or hazes in GJ 436b's atmosphere can match both sets of observations for Neptune-like compo- sitions (50–300 × solar), without invoking ultra-high metal- licity (>1000× solar) compositions. We combine our self- consistent treatment with results from chemically-consistent retrievals that do not include clouds, and show that H/He-poor atmospheric compositions with tidal heating provide the most precise fit to GJ 436b's thermal emission spectrum, while also fitting the transmission spectrum. 1.4.1. Format of this work In Section 2 we describe the observations and data analysis. In Section 3, we describe the modeling tools used to simulate the observations, including both self-consistent and retrieval models. In Section 4.2 we compare the data to self-consistent models; in Section 4.3 we use retrieval algorithms to retrieve chemical abundances and pressure–temperature profile and compare these results with the results from self-consistent modeling. 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA ANALYSIS 2.1. Photometry and Instrumental Model These observations were obtained in the 3.6 and 4.5 µm bandpasses using the Infra-Red Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope. In this paper we present three new secondary eclipse observations of this planet, including a 3.6 µm observation obtained on UT 2014 Jul 29 and two 4.5 µm observations obtained on UT 2014 Aug 11 and UT 2015 Feb 25, respectively, as part of Spitzer program 50056 (PI: Knutson). We also re-examine three archival eclipse ob- servations including a 3.6 µm eclipse from UT 2008 Jan 30, as well as 4.5 µm eclipses from UT 2008 Feb 2 and UT 2011 Jan 24 (Stevenson et al. 2010, 2012; Lanotte et al. 2014). Eclipses from 2008 were observed during Spitzer's cryogenic mission, while the remaining eclipses were observed during the ex- tended warm mission. All eclipses were observed in subarray mode, with integration times and observation durations given in Table 1. Our new 2014-2015 observations included a now- standard 30-minute peak-up pointing observation prior to the start of our science observations. This adjustment corrects the initial telescope pointing in order to place the star near the GJ 436b TABLE 1 Spitzer OBSERVATION DETAILS 3 c c c c Bkd (%)e a tint (s)b Length (h) 5.9 4.5 5.9 6.1 4.5 4.5 nimg 163,200 122,112 49,920 51,712 122,112 122,112 λ (µm) UT Start Date 2008-01-30 3.6 3.6 2014-07-29 2008-02-02 4.5 2011-01-24 4.5 2014-08-11 4.5 4.5 2015-02-25 a Total number of images. b Integration time. c ttrim is the amount of time in hours trimmed from the start of each time series, nbin is the bin size used in the photometric fits, rpos is the radius of the aperture used to determine the position of the star on the array, and rphot is the radius of the photometric aperture in pixels. e Sky background contribution to the total flux for the selected aperture. rphot 2.8 2.5 2.9 4.5 2.7 2.8 nbin 192 128 32 32 128 128 ttrim 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 0.5 0.5 rpos 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.05 0.25 0.09 0.38 0.11 0.12 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 center of the pixel where the effect of intrapixel sensitivity variations is minimized. We utilize BCD image files for our photometric analysis and extract BJDUTC mid-exposure times using the information in the image headers. The sky background for each 32×32 pixel image is calculated by excluding a circular region with a radius of twelve pixels centered on the star, taking all of the remaining pixels and trimming outliers greater than three standard deviations away from the median, and then fitting a Gaussian function to a histogram of the remaining pixels. We calculate the flux-weighted centroid position of the star on the array and derive the corresponding total flux in a circular aper- ture for each individual image as described in previous stud- ies (e.g. Lewis et al. 2013; Deming et al. 2015; Kammer et al. 2015). We consider both fixed and time varying photometric aperture sizes in our fits but find that in all cases we obtain a lower RMS and reduced levels of time-correlated ("red") noise in our best-fit residuals using fixed apertures, in good agreement with the conclusions of Lanotte et al. (2014). We consider apertures with radii ranging between 2.0−5.0 pixels, where we step in increments of 0.1 pixels between 2.0 − 3.0 pixels and in 0.5 pixel increments for larger radii. The sensitivity of individual 3.6 and 4.5 µm IRAC pixels varies from the center to the edge; when combined with short- term telescope pointing oscillations, this produces variations in the raw stellar fluxes plotted in Fig. 1. We correct for this effect using the pixel-level decorrelation (PLD) method (Deming et al. 2015), which produces results that are compa- rable to or superior to those from a simple polynomial decor- relation or pixel mapping method for light curves with du- rations of less than ten hours (for a discussion of the PLD method applied to longer phase curve observations, see Wong et al. 2015). We utilize the raw flux values in a 3× 3 grid of pixels centered on the position of the star, and then normal- ize these individual pixel values by dividing by the total flux in each 3× 3 postage stamp. We then incorporate these light curves into an instrumental model given by: (cid:80) wiFi(t)(cid:80) Fi(t) i i Fmodel(t) = (1) where Fmodel is the predicted stellar flux in an individual im- age, Fi is the measured flux in the ith individual pixel, and wi is the weight associated with that pixel. We leave these weights as free parameters in our fit, and solve for the values that best match our observed light curves simultaneously with FIG. 1.- Raw Spitzer 3.6 and 4.5 µm photometry as a function of time from the center of eclipse phase reported in Knutson et al. (2011). We bin the photometry in 30 s (grey filled circles) and 5 minute (black filled circles) intervals, and overplot the best fit instrumental models binned in 5 minute intervals for comparison (solid lines). our eclipse fits. Following the example of Deming et al. (2015), we fit this model to binned light curves with optimal bin sizes given in Table 1, where we considered a range of bin sizes between 1– 512 points sampled in steps of 2n. After identifying the best- fit model we apply this solution to the unbinned light curves in order to generate a corresponding vector of unbinned resid- uals, which we use to evaluate the noise properties of the data. As discussed in Deming et al. (2015) and Kammer et al. (2015), we create a metric to measure the noise properties of a given version of the photometry by calculating the root mean square (RMS) variance of the residuals as a function of bin size (Fig. 2). We then take the difference between a Gaussian 0.9900.9951.0001.0051.0100.9900.9951.0001.0051.010-4-3-2-101230.9900.9951.0001.0051.010-4-3-2-10123Time From Predicted Eclipse Center [h]Relative Flux3.6 um, UT 2008 Jan 303.6 um, UT 2014 Jul 294.5 um, UT 2008 Feb 24.5 um, UT 2011 Jan 244.5 um, UT 2014 Aug 114.5 um, UT 2015 Feb 254 FIG. 2.- Standard deviation of the best-fit residuals as a function of the number of data points per bin n scaling for Gaussian noise as (black lines). We over plot the expected 1/ red dashed lines, where we have normalized these lines to match the standard deviation of the unbinned residuals. √ √ n scaling and the observed RMS as a noise model with 1/ function of bin size, square the difference, and sum over all bins. We then pick the version of the photometry that has the lowest amount of red noise as measured by our least squares metric after discarding solutions where the RMS of the best-fit residuals is more than 1.1 times higher than the lowest RMS version of the photometry. We trim a small section of data from the start of each light curve in order to remove the ex- ponential ramp, which is another well-known feature of the IRAC 3.6 and 4.5 µm arrays (e.g., Lewis et al. 2013; Zellem et al. 2014). After selecting the optimal aperture and bin sizes, we examine the normalized light curves after detector effects have been removed and vary the trim duration until we iden- tify the value which minimizes the red noise in the best-fit residuals, in agreement with our criteria for selecting the op- timal aperture and bin size. Because we do not include an ex- ponential function as part of our model fit, this criteria serves to identify trim durations which minimize the presence of the exponential ramp in our data.. We then re-run our previous analysis in order to ensure that our aperture and bin sizes are still optimal given this new trim duration. 2.2. Eclipse Model and Uncertainty Estimates We generate our secondary eclipse light curves using the routines from Mandel & Agol (2002), where we fix the planet- star radius ratio, orbital inclination, eccentricity e, longitude of periapse ω, and ratio of the orbital semi-major axis to the stellar radius to their best-fit values from Lanotte et al. (2014). We allow individual eclipse depths and center of eclipse times FIG. 3.- Normalized Spitzer 3.6 and 4.5 µm light curves as a function of time from the predicted center of eclipse, where we have divided out the best-fit instrumental model shown in Fig. 1. The normalized flux is binned in 30 s (grey filled circles) and 5 minute (black filled circles) intervals, and best fit eclipse model light curves are over plotted for comparison (solid lines). to vary as free parameters in our fits to the 3.6 µm data. We find that the eclipse depth in individual 4.5 µm observations is consistent with zero, and therefore place a Gaussian prior on the phase of the secondary eclipse in order to constrain the best-fit eclipse time. We implement this prior as a penalty in χ2 proportional to the deviation from the error-weighted mean center-of-eclipse phase and corresponding uncertainty from Knutson et al. (2011). Although we also calculate the best-fit eclipse orbital phase using the e and ω values from Lanotte et al. (2014) and find that it is consistent with the value from Knutson et al. (2011), the corresponding uncertainty is sub- stantially larger than that reported in Knutson et al. (2011). This is not surprising, as the measured times of secondary eclipse constrain ecos ω while esin ω is typically derived from fits to radial velocity data and has larger uncertainties (e.g. Pál et al. 2010; Knutson et al. 2014b). The uncertainties in the values for e and ω reported in Lanotte et al. (2014) are therefore likely to be dominated by the esin ω, while ecos ω is well-measured from secondary eclipse photometry alone. We chose not to include a prior for our 3.6 micron fits be- cause we wanted to derive an independent estimate of the eclipse center time and phase. However, to test the effect of this choice, we repeat our 3.6 µm fits including this prior on the eclipse phase and find that the measured eclipse depths change by less than 0.1 sigma, as expected for cases where the eclipse is detected at a statistically significant level. We fit our combined eclipse and instrumental noise model to each light curve using a Levenberg-Marquardt minimiza- tion routine with uniform priors on all parameters except the 0.00010.00100.01000.00010.00100.01001101001000100000.00010.00100.0100110100100010000Bin SizeStandard Deviation of Residuals3.6 um, UT 2008 Jan 303.6 um, UT 2014 Jul 294.5 um, UT 2008 Feb 24.5 um, UT 2011 Jan 244.5 um, UT 2014 Aug 114.5 um, UT 2015 Feb 250.99951.00001.00051.00100.99951.00001.00051.0010-4-3-2-101230.99951.00001.00051.0010-4-3-2-10123Time From Predicted Eclipse Center [h]Relative Flux3.6 um, UT 2008 Jan 303.6 um, UT 2014 Jul 294.5 um, UT 2008 Feb 24.5 um, UT 2011 Jan 244.5 um, UT 2014 Aug 114.5 um, UT 2015 Feb 25GJ 436b 5 TABLE 2 BEST FIT ECLIPSE PARAMETERS Fp/F∗,avg (ppm)a Tbright (K)a b Ts O −C (d)c Fp/F∗ (ppm) 177± 31 133± 35 30± 36 37± 37 64± 45 1± 44 151± 27 29± 20 879+29 −27 < 633 λ (µm) UT Start Date −0.0007± 0.0012 −0.0006± 0.0054 2008-01-30 2014-07-29 2008-02-02 2011-01-24 2014-08-11 2015-02-25 3.6 3.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 a We report the error-weighted mean eclipse depths at 3.6 and 4.5 µm. Brightness temperatures are calculated using a PHOENIX stellar model interpolated to match the published stellar temperature and surface gravity from von Braun et al. (2012). b BJDUTC - 2,450,000. c Observed minus calculated eclipse times, where we have accounted for the uncertainties in both the measured and predicted eclipse times as well as the XX s light travel time delay in the system. We calculate the predicted eclipse time using the best-fit eclipse orbital phase from Knutson et al. (2011). d We allow the eclipse times in this bandpass to vary as free parameters in our fit, but we use the orbital phase and corresponding uncertainty from Knutson et al. (2011) as a prior constraint in the fit. e 2σ upper limit based on the error-weighted average of the four 4.5 µm eclipse measurements. 4496.4888± 0.0012 6868.0655± 0.0054 4499.1334d 5585.7756d 6881.2856d 7079.5779d 4.5 µm eclipse time as described in the previous paragraph. Our model includes nine pixel weight parameters, two eclipse parameters, and a linear function of time in order to account for long-term instrumental and stellar trends. We show the re- sulting light curves and best-fit eclipse models after dividing out the best-fit instrumental noise model and linear function of time in Fig. 3. Uncertainties on model parameters are cal- culated using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis with 106 steps initialized at the location of the best-fit solu- tion from our Levenberg-Marquardt minimization. We trim any remaining burn-in at the start of the chain by checking to see where the χ2 value of the chain first drops below the median value over the entire chain, and trim all points prior to this step. We find that in all cases our probability distributions for the best-fit eclipse depths and times are Gaussian and do not show any correlations with other model parameters. We therefore take the symmetric 68% interval around the median parameter value as our 1σ uncertainties. 3. ATMOSPHERIC MODELING We use a combination of self-consistent modeling and re- trieval algorithms to model the atmosphere of GJ 436b and match its spectrum. The self-consistent modeling mirrors that used in Morley et al. (2015); our suite of tools includes a 1D radiative–convective model to calculate the pressure– temperature structure, a photochemical model to calculate the formation of hydrocarbons that may form hazes, and a cloud model to calculate cloud mixing ratios, altitudes, and parti- cle sizes. We calculate spectra in different geometries and wavelengths using a transmission spectrum model, a thermal emission spectrum model, and an albedo model. We also use a retrieval model, CHIMERA (Line et al. 2012, 2013, 2014) to explore the thermal emission spectrum. In the following subsections we will briefly discuss each of these calculations. We fit our models to the thermal emission and transmission spectra separately and then analyze the regions of parameter space where the same model parameters fit both the thermal emission and transmission spectra. 3.1. 1D Radiative–Convective Model We calculate the temperature structures of GJ 436b's at- mosphere assuming radiative–convective equilibrium. These models are more extensively described in McKay et al. (1989); Marley et al. (1996); Burrows et al. (1997); Marley et al. (1999, 2002); Fortney et al. (2005); Saumon & Marley (2008); Fortney et al. (2008). Our opacity database for gases is described in Freedman et al. (2008, 2014). We calculate the effect of cloud opacity using Mie theory, assuming spher- ical particles. Optical properties of sulfide and salt clouds and soot haze are from a variety of sources and presented in Mor- ley et al. (2012) and Morley et al. (2013). To calculate P–T profiles for models with greater than 50× solar metallicity, we make the same approximation as used in Morley et al. (2015). We multiply the total molecular gas opacity by a constant factor (e.g. we multiply the 50× so- lar opacities by 6 to approximate the opacity in a 300× solar composition atmosphere). We change the abundances of hy- drogen and helium separately to calculate collision-induced absorption. This approximation is appropriate for the results explored here; for future work, e.g. comparing models to JWST data, new k-coefficients at 100–1000OE solar metallic- ity should be used. 3.2. Equilibrium Chemistry After calculating the pressure–temperature profiles of mod- els with greater than 50× solar metallicity, we calculate the gas abundances assuming chemical equilibrium along that profile. We use the Chemical Equilibrium with Applications model (CEA, Gordon & McBride 1994) to compute the ther- mochemical equilibrium molecular mixing ratios (with appli- cations to exoplanets see, Visscher et al. (2010); Line et al. (2010); Moses et al. (2011); Line et al. (2011); Line & Yung (2013)). CEA minimizes the Gibbs Free Energy with an el- emental mass balance constraint given a local temperature, pressure, and elemental abundances. We include molecules containing H, C, O, N, S, P, He, Fe, Ti, V, Na, and K. We account for the depletion of oxygen due to enstatite conden- sation by removing 3.28 oxygen atoms per Si atom (Burrows & Sharp 1999). When adjusting the metallicity all elemental abundances are rescaled equally relative to H, ensuring that the elemental abundances sum to one. 3.3. Photochemical Haze Model We use results from photochemical modeling in Line et al. (2011). Briefly, the computations use the Caltech/JPL pho- tochemical and kinetics model, KINETICS (a fully implicit, finite difference code), which solves the coupled continuity equations for each species and includes transport via both molecular and eddy diffusion (Allen et al. 1981; Yung et al. 6 1984; Moses et al. 2005). We use results for 50× solar com- position, Kzz=108 cm2/s (Figures 5, 6 and 7 in Line et al. (2011)). We follow the approach developed in Morley et al. (2013) and used for GJ 1214b in Morley et al. (2015) to calculate the locations of soot particles based on the photochemistry. We sum the number densities of the five soot precursors (C2H2, C2H4, C2H6, C4H2, and HCN) to find the total mass in soot precursors. We assume that the soots form at the same alti- tudes as the soot precursors exist: we multiply the precursors' masses by our parameter fhaze (the mass fraction of precursors that form soots) to find the total mass of the haze particles in a given layer. We vary both fhaze and the mode particle size as free parameters, and calculate the optical properties of the haze using Mie theory. 3.4. Sulfide/Salt Cloud Model To model sulfide and salt clouds, we use a modified version of the Ackerman & Marley (2001) cloud model (Morley et al. 2012, 2013, 2015). Cloud material in excess of the saturation vapor pressure of the limiting gas is assumed to condense into spherical, homogeneous cloud particles. We extrapolate the saturation vapor pressure equations from Morley et al. (2012) to high metallicites, which introduces some uncertainties but serves as a reasonable first-order approximation for the forma- tion of these cloud species. Cloud particle sizes and vertical distributions are calculated by balancing transport by advec- tion with particle settling. 3.5. Thermal Emission Spectra We use a radiative transfer model developed in Morley et al. (2015) to calculate the thermal emission of a planet with arbitrary composition and clouds. Briefly, this model includes the C version of the open-source radiative transfer code disort (Stamnes et al. 1988; Buras et al. 2011) which uses the discrete-ordinate method to calculate intensities and fluxes in multiple-scattering and emitting layered media. 3.6. Albedo Spectra We calculate albedo spectra following the methods de- scribed in Toon et al. (1977, 1989); McKay et al. (1989); Marley et al. (1999); Marley & McKay (1999); Cahoy et al. (2010). Here, we use the term geometric albedo to refer to the albedo spectrum at full phase (α=0, where the phase an- gle α is the angle between the incident ray from the star to the planet and the line of sight to the observer): Ag(λ) = Fp(λ, α = 0) F(cid:12),L(λ) (2) where λ is the wavelength, Fp(λ, α = 0) is the reflected flux at full phase, and F(cid:12),L(λ) is the flux from a perfect Lambert disk of the same radius under the same incident flux. 3.7. Retrieval Model To more thoroughly explore the chemically plausible pa- rameter space allowed by the emission spectrum, we employ the chemically consistent atmospheric retrieval scheme de- scribed in Kreidberg et al. (2015) and Greene et al. (2016) based on the CHIMERA (Line et al. 2013, 2014) emission forward model. The retrieval uses the 6 parameter analytic radiative equilibrium temperature profile scheme of Parmen- tier & Guillot (2014) (see Line et al. (2013) for implemen- tation within the emission retrieval) where the free parame- ters are the infrared opacity (κIR), the ratio of the visible to FIG. 4.- Eclipse depths in the 6 Spitzer bandpasses from the literature and this work. Different publications are offset slightly in wavelength for clarity; darker colors indicate later years. TABLE 3 UNIFORM PRIOR RANGES ON THE RETRIEVED PARAMETERS parameter range log(κIR)[cm2/g] log(γ1, γ2) α β Tint (K) M/H log(C/O)a log(Pquench) [bar] −3 to 0 −3 to 2 0 to 1 0 to 2 100 to 400 10−4 to 104× solar −2 to 2 −6 to 1.5 a Solar log(C/O) is −0.26. infrared opacity for two visible streams (γ1, γ2), the parti- tioning between the two visible streams (α), scaling to the top-of-atmosphere irradiation temperature (β, to accommo- date for the unknown albedo and redistribution), and finally the internal temperature (Tint). These parameters are all free parameters, not recalculated to be consistent with the derived abundances (Line et al. 2012). The molecular abundances are initially computed along the temperature profile under the assumption of thermochemi- cal equilibrium (using the Chemical Equilibrium with Appli- cations routine, Gordon & McBride 1994;1996; Line et al. (2010); Moses et al. (2011); Line et al. (2011)) given the bulk atmospheric metallicity ([M/H]) and carbon-to-oxygen ratio (C/O). To account for possible disequilibrium chemistry we include a "quench pressure" parameter (Pquench) whereby the abundances of H2O, CH4, and CO above the quench are fixed at their quench pressure values, a valid representation of many disequilibrium models (e.g., Moses et al. 2011; Line et al. 2011; Zahnle & Marley 2014). The temperature profile and chemistry parameters result in a total of 9 free parameters. Bayesian estimation is performed using a multi-modal nested sampling algorithm (Feroz et al. 2009) implemented with the PYMULTINEST routine (Buchner et al. 2014) recently em- ployed in Line & Parmentier (2016), with generous uniform priors on each parameter (see Table 3). 4. RESULTS 4.1. Observations GJ 436b 7 red ∼11 assuming an inadequate fit to the thermal emission (χ2 3 degrees of freedom). We show the thermal emission and transmission spectra in Figure 6. 4.2.2. Equilibrium and disequilibrium chemistry As has been discussed in the literature (Stevenson et al. 2010; Line et al. 2011; Moses et al. 2013), GJ 436b's high 3.6 µm flux and low 4.5 µm flux indicate that it likely has a high abundance of CO and CO2 relative to CH4. Since equilib- rium chemistry for an object at GJ 436b's temperature would instead result in high abundances of CH4 at metallicities sim- ilar to Neptune, this indicates that GJ 436b's chemistry is in disequilibrium. This disequilibrium may be due to a combi- nation of vertical mixing, photochemistry, and other effects (Line et al. 2011). Here, we approximate the effect of dis- equilibrium chemistry by 'quenching' the abundances of the carbon species (CO, CO2, CH4) in the atmosphere at deep pressures (10 bar), effectively setting the abundances of these species to be constant through the atmosphere. The resulting effect of disequilibrium chemistry on spec- tra is shown in Figure 7. In equilibrium, the model predicts that GJ 436b would be very faint at 3.6 µm, and progressively brighter at redder wavelengths. In disequilibrium, as is ob- served in the data, the planet is predicted to be brighter at 3.6 µm due to decreased absorption by CH4. In general, even the models that include disequilibrium chemistry overpredict the brightness at 4.5 µm compared to the observed flux, despite the higher abundance of CO and CO2 in disequilibrium. 4.2.3. Metallicity Increasing the metallicity of GJ 436b's atmosphere allows us to fit both the thermal emission and transmission spectrum more accurately. There are two reasons for this. As has been discussed at length in Moses et al. (2013), high metallicity atmospheres are predicted, in equilibrium or disequilibrium, to have higher abundances of CO and CO2 relative to CH4. Pushing the chemistry to CO/CO2-rich compositions is cru- cial to match GJ 436b's thermal emission. We show this ef- fect in Figure 8; models at high metallicities have higher flux at 3.6 and 8 µm due to the change in chemistry. We find that this effect partially saturates at metallicities greater than 300× solar. High metallicities also make it much easier to flatten the transmission spectrum of GJ 436b sufficiently to match the featureless HST/WFC3 transmission spectrum even in the ab- sence of clouds (Knutson et al. 2014a). In Figure 9 we show cloud-free models for different metallicities. While at metal- licities lower than 1000× solar metallicity clouds are required to sufficiently flatten the spectrum, for models above 1000× solar metallicity even cloud-free models have high enough mean molecular weights that the size of the features, which scale according to the scale height of the atmosphere, are small enough that they appear featureless at the S/N of the data. 4.2.4. Tidal heating As a Neptune-sized planet orbiting an old star, without an additional energy source, GJ 436b's interior temperature Tint would be ∼60 K, slightly warmer than Neptune which has a Tint∼50 K (Fortney et al. 2007). However, GJ 436b is on an eccentric orbit (e∼0.15) despite orbiting its star at a semi major axis where it is predicted to have a tidally circularized orbit, indicating that its interior may still be heated by tidal FIG. 5.- Pressure–temperature profiles with condensation curves. All models are cloud-free with 300× solar composition. Solid lines show models with Tint=100, 240, and 400 K and planet-wide heat redistribution. Dash-dot lines show models with the same Tints but with no heat redistribution (day- side temperature). Condensation curves show where the vapor pressure of a gas is equal to the saturation vapor pressure; cloud material condenses where the P–T profile intersections a condensation curve. The new eclipse depths are shown in Table 2 and Figure 4. Our eclipse depths of 151±27 ppm at 3.6 µm and 29+20 −16 ppm at 4.5 µm are consistent to 1-σ with those published in Lanotte et al. (2014) (177±45 and 28+25 −18 ppm respectively), with a moderate reduction in the uncertainties in both bands. This result serves as confirmation of the high flux at 3.6 µm compared to 4.5 µm. 4.2. Self-Consistent Modeling We ran a variety of models from 50–1000× solar metallic- ity, varied heat redistribution (planet-wide average and day- side average), internal temperatures (Tint) from 100–400 K, with clouds ( fsed=0.01–1), and hazes with particle sizes from 0.01–1 µm and fhaze from 1–30%. We compare each model to the thermal emission photometry from this work (3.6 and 4.5 µm) and from Lanotte et al. (2014) (5.6, 8.0, 16 µm), us- ing a chi-squared analysis to assess relative goodness-of-fit between the models. We show example pressure–temperature profiles along with cloud condensation curves in Figure 5. Raising the internal temperature, Tint, increases the temperature of the deep at- mosphere (P(cid:38)0.1 bar). The heat redistribution of incident stellar flux controls the temperature in the upper atmosphere. GJ 436b's profile crosses condensation curves of sulfides and salts, suggesting that if the atmosphere is cloudy, those clouds may be composed of Na2S, KCl, and ZnS. 4.2.1. Best-fit fiducial model Of the 288 models in our grid of cloudy and cloud-free planets, our nominal best-fit set of parameters are: • 1000× solar metallicity • Tint=240 K • fsed=0.3 sulfide/salt clouds • disequilibrium chemistry via quenching • full heat redistribution (planet-wide average PT profile) This model provides an excellent fit to the transmission red <1 assuming 3 degrees of freedom), though spectrum (χ2 2004006008001000120014001600temperature (K)6543210123log(pressure) (bar)MnSNa2SZnSCrKClH2OTint=400 K240 K100 Kplanet-wide redistributionno redistribution8 FIG. 6.- Best-fit thermal emission and transmission spectra. Top panel: Thermal emission spectrum of the best-fit model from the suite of forward models compared to the data. The model is shown as a green line, with synthetic model photometry shown as horizontal lines at the central wavelength of the filter. Data are shown as black points with 1-σ error bars. The filter functions for the photometry are shown as gray lines in the top panel. Bottom panels: Transmission spectrum of the same best-fit thermal emission model from the suite of forward models compared to the data. The model is shown as a green line in both panels. The HST/WFC3 transmission spectrum is shown as black points with 1-σ error bars in the bottom panel. dissipation. Moses et al. (2013) and Agúndez et al. (2014) both considered the effect of tidal heating, noting that a hotter interior changes the chemistry of the deep interior and there- fore the resulting emission spectrum. Increasing Tint tends to move the deep P–T profile (see Fig- ure 5) to regions with high CO/CO2 and lower CH4 abun- dances, which allows us to better match the observed spec- trum. Heating the deep atmosphere also increases the effec- tive temperature of the atmosphere by changing the P–T pro- file, increasing flux at all Spitzer wavelengths. This effect is shown in Figure 11 for three different Tint values (100, 240, and 400 K). Best-fit models cluster around Tint=240 K, a tem- perature that allows us to match the 3.6, 5.6, and 8.0 µm points relatively well, while over predicting the 4.5 µm flux some- what. We note that this is the first indication that the internal tem- perature of a planet has an important and observable effect on the emission spectrum of a transiting planet. 4.2.5. Clouds Clouds increase opacity across all wavelengths as (rela- tively) gray absorbers. This means that including clouds de- creases flux between absorption features (e.g. at 3.6 and 8.0 µm for GJ 436b's composition) and somewhat less signifi- cantly at the locations of absorption features where the planet is already dark. Thinner clouds ( fsed=0.3–1 in our param- eterization) alter the spectrum slightly, while thicker clouds ( fsed≤0.1) create a blackbody-like spectrum with the temper- ature of the top of the cloud. Comparing this to the observed photometry of GJ 436b, these thick clouds significantly under predict the flux at 3.6 µm especially. In transmission, clouds flatten the spectrum without in- creasing the mean molecular weight of molecular gas in the atmosphere. As discussed above, for metallicities ∼1000× solar, no additional cloud opacity is needed to match the fea- red∼1 for all models). At 300× solar tureless spectrum (χ2 metallicity, thin clouds ( fsed=1) adequately obscure the spec- tral features, whereas for a Neptune-like 100× solar composi- tion, fsed=0.3 clouds are required. In the Ackerman & Marley (2001) prescription, lower fsed values indicate less efficient 23456789101520wavelength (¹m)0.00000.00020.00040.00060.00080.00100.00120.00140.00160.0018Fp/Fs[3.6][4.5][5.8][8.0][16]1000£, Tint=240 K, fsed=0.3, quenched0.51251020wavelength (µm)4.2554.2604.2654.2704.2754.2804.2854.290radius (R⊕)1000×, Tint=240 K, fsed=0.3, quenched1.151.251.351.451.551.65wavelength (µm)20015010050050100150relative transit depth, ppmGJ 436b 9 FIG. 7.- Effect of chemistry on thermal emission spectrum. Both mod- els assume 300× solar metallicity, fsed=1 sulfide/salt clouds, planet-wide heat redistribution, and Tint=240 K. The darker blue line and horizontal bars show a model spectrum and photometry assuming equilibrium chemistry; the lighter blue line and horizontal bars show the same model, but with the chem- istry quenched at the 10 bar abundances throughout the atmosphere. FIG. 9.- Effect of metallicity on transmission spectrum. Each model is cloud-free, with planet-wide heat redistribution, equilibrium chemistry, and Tint=240 K. Metallicities of 100, 200, 300, and 1000× solar metallicity are shown. Increasing the metallicity decreases the CH4 abundance and increases CO and CO2 abundance. FIG. 8.- Effect of metallicity on thermal emission. Each model assumes equilibrium chemistry, fsed=1 sulfide/salt clouds, planet-wide heat redistribu- tion, and Tint=240 K. Metallicities of 100, 300, and 1000× solar metallicity are shown. Increasing the metallicity decreases the CH4 abundance and in- creases CO and CO2 abundance. sedimentation, causing smaller particles sizes and more lofted clouds. 4.2.6. Photochemical Hazes in GJ 436b We investigate the effect of photochemical hazes on the thermal emission spectrum of GJ 436b. Morley et al. (2015) showed that it is possible for optically thick photochemical hazes (such as those postulated to exist in GJ 1214b) to cause a temperature inversion in the upper atmospheres of plan- ets. This can change the spectrum such that molecules that would normally be seen in absorption in a planet without a temperature inversion such as methane are actually seen in emission in an atmosphere with a temperature inversion. We tested whether this process could be happening on GJ 436b and causing the observed thermal emission. The results of this investigation are summarized in Figure 13. The top panel shows the thermal emission of the planet alone. We find that it is possible to create a temperature inver- sion with dark soot-like photochemical haze in GJ 436b, espe- cially for relatively small particle sizes. As expected, methane is seen in emission, significantly brightening the model spec- trum at 3.6 µm compared to a haze-free model. As in Morley FIG. 10.- Abundances of major carbon-bearing species in chemical equi- librium. All models have a composition of 1000× solar metallicity and a planet-wide average PT profile. Different Tint values are shown with differ- ent line styles, and each molecule (CH4, CO, CO2) is shown in a different color. The fiducial quench pressure used in the self-consistent modeling is shown as a horizontal dashed line. Note that increasing the internal tempera- ture decreases the CH4 abundance in the deep atmosphere. et al. (2015), CO2 at 4.3 µm is also predicted to be seen in emission at Neptune-like metallicities (in this case 50× solar metallicity). In the bottom panel, we show the planet-star flux ratio; here it becomes clear that the hazy model does not fit the observations significantly better than the haze-free model. In particular, the model spectrum is much fainter than the planet's 3.6 µm photometric point. The 4.5 µm flux, despite the significant changes to the shape of the spectrum across the bandpass, remains nearly identical across the range of hazy models tested. In general, we find that even though a temperature inversion in a methane-rich atmosphere can increase the 3.6 µm flux, it is not a significant enough effect to match the observed flux, and, furthermore, the flux within the 4.5 µm region can also increase due to emission in the CO2 bandpass. We conclude that photochemical hazes cannot erase the need for an atmo- 23456789101520wavelength (¹m)0.00000.00020.00040.00060.00080.00100.00120.00140.00160.0018Fp/Fs[3.6][4.5][5.8][8.0][16]quenched chemistryequilibrium chemistry23456789101520wavelength (¹m)0.00000.00020.00040.00060.00080.00100.00120.00140.00160.0018Fp/Fs[3.6][4.5][5.8][8.0][16]100£ solar300£ solar1000£ solar1.151.251.351.451.551.65wavelength (µm)2001000100200relative transit depth, ppm100×, χred=5.4300×, χred=2.01000×, χred=0.910-810-710-610-510-410-310-210-1100number mixing ratio10-610-510-410-310-210-1100101102103pressure (bar)quench pressureCH4, Tint=100 KCO2, Tint=100 KCO, Tint=100 KCH4, Tint=240 KCO2, Tint=240 KCO, Tint=240 KCH4, Tint=400 KCO2, Tint=400 KCO, Tint=400 K10 FIG. 11.- Effect of tidal heating on thermal emission. Each model as- sumes 300× solar metallicity, quenched chemistry, fsed=1 sulfide/salt clouds, and planet-wide heat redistribution. The tidally heated atmospheres (240 and 400 K) have higher abundances of CO and CO2 and lower abundances of CH4 due to the hotter deep atmosphere (where the chemistry is quenched). Tidal heating also increases the Teff of the planet by changing the temperature profile, increasing the emergent flux at all wavelengths. FIG. 12.- Effect of sulfide/salt clouds on thermal emission. Each model uses the same pressure-temperature profile and assumes 300× solar metallic- ity, quenched chemistry, planet-wide heat redistribution, and Tint=240 K. A cloud-free model and cloudy models with fsed=0.03 to 1 are shown. Cloud opacity decreases the thermal emission across the spectrum. Models with moderate clouds ( fsed=0.3 to 1) fit the Spitzer points best. sphere with significant CO and CO2 and a low abundance of CH4. This required low-CH4 atmospheric composition, in turn, reduces the likelihood that carbon-based photochemi- cal hazes will be significant in the atmosphere (Fortney et al. 2013). 4.3. Retrievals We have shown in Section 4.2 that we favor models at high metallicity, with both disequilibrium chemistry and tidal heat- ing; these three properties combine to maximize the CO/CO2 abundances and minimize CH4 abundance, allowing the mod- els to match approximately with the measured photometry. Retrieval models provide a quantitative way to test these con- clusions and fully explore parameter space beyond our self- consistent model grids. We find that retrieval methods draw similar conclusions to the self-consistent modeling; GJ 436b appears to be very high metallicity, with evidence for both deeply-quenched disequi- librium chemistry and thermal heating of the deep interior. For the dayside thermal emission spectrum, the best-fit re- FIG. 13.- Effect of photochemical hazes on thermal emission. The top panel shows the emergent flux from the planet. All models have 50× solar metallicity, equilibrium chemistry, and planet-wide heat redistribution. The gray line shows a cloud-free model, and the colored lines show a progression of hazy models with hazy-forming efficiency parameter fhaze varying from 1 to 30%. The bottom panel shows the same models, but dividing by the flux of the host star to compare to the measured photometry. trieved solution has a goodness-of-fit divided by number of data points χ2/N=2.02, compared to χ2/N=4.54 for the best self-consistent thermal emission spectrum, indicating a sig- nificantly improved fit. A comparison of the Bayesian Infor- mation Criteria (BIC) reveals that that additional parameters used in the retrieval fitting are necessary, with a BIC of ∼26 for the best-fit retrieved solution and ∼34 for the best-fit self- consistent solution. 4.3.1. Retrieved Posterior Probability Distributions Retrieved posterior probability distributions and correla- tions are shown in the stair-pair plot in Figure 14 for 5 of the 9 free parameters in the retrieval: β, Tint, [M/H], log(C/O), log(Pquench). The best-fit models have: • High metallicity. The maximum likelihood model has a metallicity of ∼6000× solar metallicity, with a 3-σ lower limit on the metallicity of 106× solar. • Disequilibrium chemistry. The maximum likelihood model has a quench pressure around 9 bar (with a wide range of values for Pquench allowed). • Enhanced internal temperature. The maximum likeli- hood Tint is 336 K (with large uncertainties), indicating 23456789101520wavelength (¹m)0.00000.00020.00040.00060.00080.00100.00120.00140.00160.0018Fp/Fs[3.6][4.5][5.8][8.0][16]Tint=100 KTint=240 KTint=400 K23456789101520wavelength (¹m)0.00000.00020.00040.00060.00080.00100.00120.00140.00160.0018Fp/Fs[3.6][4.5][5.8][8.0][16]fsed=0.1fsed=0.3fsed=1cloud-free123456789101520wavelength (µm)05001000150020002500flux (W/m2/µm)50×, haze-free0.03 µm, fhaze=1%0.03 µm, fhaze=3%0.03 µm, fhaze=10%0.03 µm, fhaze=30%23456789101520wavelength (µm)0.00000.00020.00040.00060.00080.00100.00120.00140.00160.0018Fp/Fs[3.6][4.5][5.8][8.0][16]50×, haze-free0.03 µm, fhaze=1%0.03 µm, fhaze=3%0.03 µm, fhaze=10%0.03 µm, fhaze=30%GJ 436b 11 FIG. 14.- Posterior probability distributions and correlations. The top panel (histogram) shows the posterior probability distribution for each parameter, marginalized over all other parameters. The other panels show 2D contour plots that represent the correlations between each pair of parameters, where the regions from darkest to lightest represent the 1-, 2-, and 3-σ contours. that tidal heating may be increasing GJ 436b's internal temperature, in agreement with the tidally heated self- consistent models. • Solar C/O ratio. The maximum likelihood C/O ratio is 0.70, with a sharp cut-off at higher C/O ratios and a long tail to lower C/O ratios. In Figure 15 we compare the retrieved P–T profile to self- consistent models at 300 × solar metallicity. We find that re- trieved profile is in remarkable agreement with self-consistent models that include the effect of tidal heating in the deep in- terior. Our best-fit Tint from the self-consistent modeling ap- proach (240 K) falls within the 2-σ range of the retrieved pro- file. The contribution functions for each of the Spitzer band- passes are also shown in Figure 15. 3.6 µm probes the deepest pressures, probing pressures as high as 1 bar. As expected, comparing the contribution functions to the range of P–T pro- files found by the retrieval, the spread in allowed P–T profiles increases for pressures deeper than 1 bar. The other wave- lengths probe lower pressures of the atmosphere, with 5.8 and 8.0 µm centered around 0.05 bar and 16 µm centered around 0.003 bar. The 4.5 µm bandpass has the largest range of pres- sures, with a peak at deep pressures (0.2 bar) and a long tail to low pressures, unsurprising given that the band covers the spectrum where the modulation is the greatest. Figure 16 shows the best-fit retrieved range of spectra com- pared to both the data and the best-fit self-consistent model. The retrieved best-fit is statistically and by-eye a somewhat better fit to the data than the self-consistent models. In par- ticular, it has higher flux at 3.6 µm and lower flux at 4.5 µm. Both the retrieved and self-consistent models fit the 5.6 and 8.0 µm points well; the 16 µm photometry is underestimated by both models, though the error bar is large. 5. DISCUSSION 5.1. Predictions for Reflected Light Spectra Cloud properties have the strongest effect on the predicted reflected light spectrum of GJ 436b. Cloud-free models are dark from 0.6–1µm (Ag<1%) and somewhat brighter (up to Ag ∼10%) at bluer wavelengths, as is generally true for cloud- less giant planets (Marley et al. 1999; Sudarsky et al. 2000). Thinner clouds ( fsed=0.3–1) are brighter with albedos be- tween a few percent and tens of percent. Thicker clouds ( fsed=0.1) have the brightest albedos from 0.6 to 1µm, up to nearly 30%. Some example cloudy spectra are shown in the top panel of Figure 17. Other properties have weaker effects on the reflected light spectrum for this planet. For example, models with metal- licities from 100–300× solar metallicity are shown in the bot- tom panel of Figure 17. Increasing the metallicity (which also changes the cloud) increases the geometric albedo across the spectrum. 5.2. Are Very High Metallicities Reasonable? We find that the best-fit atmospheric models have high metallicities, but it remains to be seen whether these values 12 FIG. 15.- Pressure–temperature profiles and contribution functions for each bandpass. The left panel shows pressure-temperature profiles of both retrieved and self-consistent models. The black line indicates the median retrieved profile while the dark and light gray shaded regions represent the 1- and 2-σ confidence regions respectively. The colored lines show self-consistent models with planet-wide heat redistribution and Tint of 100, 240, and 400 K. Note the good agreement between the tidally heated (240–400 K) models and the retrieved profile. The right panel shows contribution functions for each of the five bandpasses for a representative retrieval model. The shortest wavelength 3.6 µm band probes the deepest wavelengths while the 16 µm band proves the shallowest. FIG. 16.- Retrieved data compared to data and best-fit self-consistent model. The pink line and shaded dark and light pink regions are the median fit, 1-σ, and 2-σ confidence intervals respectively. The green line is the best-fit self-consistent model (300× solar metallicity, Tint=240 K, fsed=0.3, quenched disequilibrium chemistry). are physically realistic. GJ 436b has a different host star, equi- librium temperature, and orbit than the ice giants in our own solar system, so it likely formed and evolved in very different conditions. The maximum metal-enrichment of the envelope of a Neptune-mass exoplanet is not yet known. Studies of this to date, including Fortney et al. (2013), have suggested that a diverse range of outcomes might be expected for planets in this intermediate mass regime between Earth and Saturn, with potentially high atmospheric enrichments in some cases. Furthermore, because of the uncertainty in the internal en- tropy of GJ 436b, its mass and radius do not provide strong limits on the metal-enrichment of the envelope. Nettelmann et al. (2010) find that a minimum H/He fraction of 10−3 Mp is necessary to match the radius. This very low H/He fraction would require a warm planetary interior, as is favored by the best-fit thermal emission spectra in this work. In Figure 18 we show the results from interior models (Thorngren et al. 2015), which show the envelope H/He mass fraction required to match GJ 436b's mass and radius mea- surements for core masses from 0 to 20 M⊕. These one- dimensional interior models include an inert core composed of either 50% rock and 50% ice or 100% water ice. Each model has a homogenous convective envelope made of a H/He-rock-ice or H/He-ice mixture. We use equations of state from Thompson (1990) (water and water-rock) and Saumon et al. (1995) (H/He), and atmospheric models from Fortney et al. (2007). Neither the pure water or water-rock equations of state are dependent on temperature; since GJ 436b has a hot interior, we expect that the true equation of state of its interior 4006008001000120014001600temperature (K)654321012log(pressure) (bar)Tint=400 K240 K100 Kmedian1-σ2-σ0.00.20.40.60.81.0contribution function654321012log(pressure) (bar)[3.6][4.5][5.8][8.0][16]23456789101520wavelength (µm)0.00000.00020.00040.00060.00080.00100.00120.00140.0016Fp/Fsbest-fit self-consistent modelmedian retrieved spectrum1-σ2-σGJ 436b 13 velope metallicity is somewhat lower than 1000× solar metal- licity. For a 20 M⊕ core, the minimum envelope metallicity required to match the observed mass and radius is ∼300× so- lar metallicity (though the envelope could be less enriched if the core is somewhat larger than 20 M⊕. These calculations suggest that the very high metallicities above 1000× solar metallicity explored by our retrieval models are not physically realistic for this planet, but metallicities above 300× solar are favored. Very high metallicities are only possible if accretion and subsequent enrichment is dominated by rocky rather than icy materials; Fortney et al. (2013) show that if the majority of ac- cretion is from icy material, the hydrogen in those ices is also accreted and the maximum metal-enrichment is about ∼600× solar metallicity. Though we cannot currently distinguish be- tween compositions less than or greater than 600× solar com- position, if GJ 436b is indeed very metal-enhanced, it likely formed in a region with more refractory than volatile materi- als available. 5.3. Role of JWST Spectral Observations JWST will amplify our understanding of warm Neptunes like GJ 436b by providing spectra instead of photometry, breaking some of the current degeneracies. For example, examining the spectra in Figure 16, it is clear that models with very different spectra can have very similar photometry. JWST may also allow us to detect molecules that are not cur- rently included in most models; for example, Shabram et al. (2011) showed that if species such as C2H2 and HCN exist in the atmosphere of GJ 436b, their abundances could be con- strained by measuring the widths of features at 1.5, 3.3, and 7 µm. Greene et al. (2016) quantify our ability to constrain planet properties of a wider variety of atmospheres including hot Jupiters, warm Neptunes, warm sub-Neptunes, and cool su- per Earths with JWST and find that the mixing ratios of major species in warm Neptunes like GJ 436b can be constrained to within better than 1 dex with a single secondary eclipse ob- servation for each wavelength region from 1–11 µm. 5.4. Measuring Internal Dissipation Factor Using Tint Measuring Tint of GJ 436b using atmospheric models al- lows us to approximate the dissipation factor in GJ 436b's interior, Q(cid:48). Q(cid:48) is defined as 3Q/2k2, where Q is the qual- ity factor and k2 is the Love number of degree 2 (Goldreich & Soter 1966). Our best-fit Tint from the retrieval analysis is 336 K. Agúndez et al. (2014) calculated relations between Tint and Q(cid:48) assuming obliquities of 0 and 15 degrees and 3 different rotation speeds (1:1 resonance, 3:2 resonance, and pseudo-synchronous). Assuming Tint∼300–350 K, their cal- culations suggest that Q(cid:48) ∼ 2 × 105–106. These values are somewhat larger than the value of Q(cid:48) that has been measured using Neptune's satellites of between 3.3×104 and 1.35×105 (Zhang & Hamilton 2008). If this high value for Q(cid:48) is correct, this has significant im- plications for both the structure of GJ 436b itself and the evo- lution of the planetary system. In particular, a high Q(cid:48) is con- sistent with a tidal circularization timescale that is longer than the age of the system, allowing GJ 436b to maintain its non- zero eccentricity (e ∼0.15) without invoking another object in the system (Jackson et al. 2008; Batygin et al. 2009). This is consistent with the observations to date that have not found a third body in the GJ 436 system despite extensive searches FIG. 17.- Predicted albedo spectra. Top panel shows models with 300×solar metallicity, Tint=240 K. A cloud-free model and models with cloud parameter fsed from 0.03 to 1 are shown. Bottom panel shows mod- els with Tint=240 K, fsed=0.3. Metallicities from 100 to 300 × solar are shown. FIG. 18.- Core mass vs. envelope H/He fraction required to match GJ 436b's measured mass and radius. Models that include a rock/ice core and mix of H/He and rock/ice in the envelope are shown as solid lines, while models that include a water ice core and mix of H/He and water in the enve- lope are shown as dashed lines. Different colors represent different interior temperature Tint. Approximate conversions between envelope H/He fraction and atmospheric metallicity for 1000 and 300× solar metallicity are shown at the right. will be more accurately matched by the water ice equation of state, even though the composition is likely a mix of heavy elements. We find that for the best-fit Tint of 336 K the maximum en- 0.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0wavelength (µm)0.00.10.20.30.40.5geometric albedo300× solar, Tint=240 Kcloud-freefsed=1fsed=0.3fsed=0.10.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0wavelength (µm)0.00.10.20.30.40.5geometric albedoTint=240 K, fsed=0.3100 × solar200 × solar300 × solar05101520CoreMass(EarthMasses)0.050.100.150.200.250.300.350.40EnvelopeH/HeFraction100K240K336K400K50%Rock,50%IceWater~1000x ~300x 14 If GJ 436b's Q does differ significantly (see Section 1.3). from Neptune's, this potentially implies a structural difference between hot Neptunes on short orbits and the ice giants in our own solar system. 5.5. Condensation of graphite As has been discussed in, e.g., Moses et al. (2013), cool high metallicity atmospheres may have regions that are stable for the condensation of graphite. Indeed, the very high metal- licity models favored by the retrieval models do indeed cross the graphite stability curve above 0.1 bar. While the effect of this condensation is beyond the scope of this work, the major effects would be twofold. First, the graphite condensation will deplete the carbon reservoir, decreasing the CO abundance in the upper atmosphere. In addition, the condensed graphite may form into cloud particles with their own opacity. Like other clouds and hazes, graphite clouds would likely decrease the size of features in transmission spectra and thermal emis- sion spectra, and may either increase or decrease the albedo depending on the optical properties of the graphite particles. 5.6. Spatially Inhomogeneous Clouds Planetary atmospheres are by their nature three dimensional and complex, and clouds in these atmospheres may be non uniformly located. In particular, the terminators of a planet have different circulation patterns and temperatures than the substellar point (e.g., Lewis et al. 2010; Kataria et al. 2016). It has recently been shown that non-uniform clouds on the terminators of planets will affect interpretation of transmis- sion spectra (Line & Parmentier 2016). Furthermore, fitting the same one-dimensional model to both the thermal emission and transmission spectra may not be an accurate assumption. For example, the terminators may be cloudy while the ther- mal emission is dominated by a relatively cloud-free region. This effect should be investigated in the future, especially with higher resolution and signal-to-noise thermal emission and transmission spectra from JWST. 6. CONCLUSION We have presented new observations of GJ 436b's thermal emission at 3.6 and 4.5 µm, which are in agreement with pre- vious analyses from Lanotte et al. (2014) and reduce the un- certainties of GJ 436b's flux at those wavelengths. For the first time, we combine these revised data with Spitzer photometry from 5.6 to 16 µm and transmission spectra from HST/WFC3 and compare these data to both self-consistent and retrieval models. We vary the metallicity, internal temperature from tidal heating, disequilibrium chemistry, heat redistribution, and cloud properties. We find that our nominal best-fitting self-consistent model has 1000× solar metallicity, Tint=240 K, fsed=0.3 sulfide/salt clouds, disequilibrium chemistry, and planet-wide average temperature profile, but this model does not provide an accurate fit to the observations. Retrieval mod- els find a statistically better fit to the ensemble data than the self-consistent model, with parameters in general agreement with the self-consistent approach: all signs point to a high metallicity, with best fits above several hundred times solar metallicity, and tidal heating warming its interior, with best- fit Tint∼300–350 K. These results are consistent with results from interior models to match the mass and radius, with core masses around 10 M⊕. While Neptune has been measured based on its methane abundance to have an atmospheric carbon enhancement of ∼100× solar, repeated observations of both the thermal emis- sion and transmission spectra of the first exo-Neptune to be studied in detail, GJ 436b, have demonstrated that it likely has a significantly higher metallicity. Neptune itself may ac- tually be more enhanced in other elements than it is in car- bon; Luszcz-Cook & de Pater (2013) infer a 400–600× solar enhancement in oxygen from microwave observations of up- welled CO in Neptune, though this cannot be verified with infrared spectra since oxygen is frozen into clouds. Studies of warmer exoplanet atmospheres will allow us to spectroscopi- cally measure abundances of these molecules like oxygen that are locked into clouds in the cold ice giants of our solar sys- tem, potentially revealing unexpected patterns in the metal- enrichments of these intermediate-mass objects. An interesting new paradigm for this class of intermediate- sized planet is now being pieced together: we suggest that Neptune-mass planets may be more compositionally diverse than previously imagined. High quality data across of range of Neptune-mass planets with different temperatures and host stars will be critical to investigate the diversity of this class of planets. We thank the anonymous referee for their helpful sugges- tions. We also thank Konstantin Batygin and Greg Laughlin for helpful discussions that improved the paper. This work was performed in part under contract with the Jet Propul- sion Laboratory (JPL) funded by NASA through the Sagan Fellowship Program executed by the NASA Exoplanet Sci- ence Institute. JJF acknowledges Hubble grants HST-GO- 13501.06-A and HST-GO-13665.004-A and NSF grant AST- 1312545. MSM acknowledges support of the NASA Origins program. MRL acknowledges support provided by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant #51362 awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, In., for NASA, under the contract NAS 5-26555. This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with NASA. REFERENCES Ackerman, A. S., & Marley, M. S. 2001, ApJ, 556, 872 Agúndez, M., Venot, O., Selsis, F., & Iro, N. 2014, ApJ, 781, 68 Allen, M., Yung, Y. L., & Waters, J. W. 1981, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 3617 Alonso, R., Barbieri, M., Rabus, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 487, L5 Ballard, S., Charbonneau, D., Deming, D., et al. 2010a, PASP, 122, 1341 Ballard, S., Christiansen, J. L., Charbonneau, D., et al. 2010b, ApJ, 716, 1047 Batygin, K., Laughlin, G., Meschiari, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 23 Beaulieu, J.-P., Tinetti, G., Kipping, D. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, 16 Beust, H., Bonfils, X., Montagnier, G., Delfosse, X., & Forveille, T. 2012, A&A, 545, A88 Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., et al. 2014, A&A, 564, A125 Buras, R., Dowling, T., & Emde, C. 2011, J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf., 112, 2028 Burrows, A., & Sharp, C. M. 1999, ApJ, 512, 843 Burrows, A., Marley, M., Hubbard, W. B., et al. 1997, ApJ, 491, 856 Butler, R. P., Vogt, S. S., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2004, ApJ, 617, 580 Cáceres, C., Ivanov, V. D., Minniti, D., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 481 Cahoy, K. L., Marley, M. S., & Fortney, J. J. 2010, ApJ, 724, 189 Deming, D., Harrington, J., Laughlin, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 667, L199 Deming, D., Knutson, H., Kammer, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 132 Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., Barman, T., et al. 2007, A&A, 475, 1125 Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P., & Bridges, M. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 1601 Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., & Barnes, J. W. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1661 GJ 436b 15 Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Lodders, K., Saumon, D., & Freedman, R. Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., & Lodders, K. 2008, ApJ, 683, 2005, ApJ, 627, L69 1104 Fortney, J. J., Mordasini, C., Nettelmann, N., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 80 Freedman, R. S., Lustig-Yaeger, J., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2014, ApJS, 214, 25 Freedman, R. S., Marley, M. S., & Lodders, K. 2008, ApJS, 174, 504 Gillon, M., Demory, B.-O., Barman, T., et al. 2007a, A&A, 471, L51 Gillon, M., Pont, F., Demory, B.-O., et al. 2007b, A&A, 472, L13 Goldreich, P., & Soter, S. 1966, Icarus, 5, 375 Greene, T. P., Line, M. R., Montero, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 17 Jackson, B., Greenberg, R., & Barnes, R. 2008, ApJ, 681, 1631 Kammer, J. A., Knutson, H. A., Line, M. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 118 Kataria, T., Sing, D. K., Lewis, N. K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 9 Knutson, H. A., Benneke, B., Deming, D., & Homeier, D. 2014a, Nature, 505, 66 Knutson, H. A., Madhusudhan, N., Cowan, N. B., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 27 Knutson, H. A., Fulton, B. J., Montet, B. T., et al. 2014b, ApJ, 785, 126 Kreidberg, L., Line, M. R., Bean, J. L., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 66 Lanotte, A. A., Gillon, M., Demory, B.-O., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, A73 Lewis, N. K., Showman, A. P., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, 344 Lewis, N. K., Knutson, H. A., Showman, A. P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 95 Line, M. R., Knutson, H., Wolf, A. S., & Yung, Y. L. 2014, ApJ, 783, 70 Line, M. R., Liang, M. C., & Yung, Y. L. 2010, ApJ, 717, 496 Line, M. R., & Parmentier, V. 2016, ApJ, 820, 78 Line, M. R., Vasisht, G., Chen, P., Angerhausen, D., & Yung, Y. L. 2011, ApJ, 738, 32 Line, M. R., & Yung, Y. L. 2013, ApJ, 779, 3 Line, M. R., Zhang, X., Vasisht, G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 749, 93 Line, M. R., Wolf, A. S., Zhang, X., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 137 Luszcz-Cook, S. H., & de Pater, I. 2013, Icarus, 222, 379 Madhusudhan, N., & Seager, S. 2011, ApJ, 729, 41 Mandel, K., & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, L171 Maness, H. L., Marcy, G. W., Ford, E. B., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 90 Marley, M. S., Gelino, C., Stephens, D., Lunine, J. I., & Freedman, R. 1999, ApJ, 513, 879 Marley, M. S., & McKay, C. P. 1999, Icarus, 138, 268 Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., Guillot, T., et al. 1996, Science, 272, 1919 Marley, M. S., Seager, S., Saumon, D., et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, 335 McKay, C. P., Pollack, J. B., & Courtin, R. 1989, Icarus, 80, 23 Morello, G., Waldmann, I. P., Tinetti, G., et al. 2015, ApJ, 802, 117 Morley, C. V., Fortney, J. J., Kempton, E. M.-R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 33 Morley, C. V., Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 172 -. 2015, ApJ, 815, 110 Moses, J. I., Fouchet, T., Bézard, B., et al. 2005, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 110, 8001 Moses, J. I., Line, M. R., Visscher, C., et al. 2013, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1306.5178 A26 Moses, J. I., Visscher, C., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 737, 15 Nettelmann, N., Kramm, U., Redmer, R., & Neuhäuser, R. 2010, A&A, 523, Pál, A., Bakos, G. Á., Torres, G., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 2665 Parmentier, V., & Guillot, T. 2014, A&A, 562, A133 Pont, F., Gilliland, R. L., Knutson, H., Holman, M., & Charbonneau, D. 2009, MNRAS, 393, L6 Ribas, I., Font-Ribera, A., & Beaulieu, J.-P. 2008, ApJ, 677, L59 Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & Horn, H. M. V. 1995, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 99, 713 727, 65 27, 2502 Saumon, D., & Marley, M. S. 2008, ApJ, 689, 1327 Shabram, M., Fortney, J. J., Greene, T. P., & Freedman, R. S. 2011, ApJ, Stamnes, K., Tsay, S.-C., Jayaweera, K., & Wiscombe, W. 1988, Appl. Opt., Stevenson, K. B., Harrington, J., Nymeyer, S., et al. 2010, Nature, 464, 1161 Stevenson, K. B., Harrington, J., Lust, N. B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 9 Sudarsky, D., Burrows, A., & Pinto, P. 2000, ApJ, 538, 885 Thompson, S. L. 1990, ANEOS-Analytic Equations of State for Shock Physics Codes, Sandia Natl. Lab. Doc. SAND89-2951 Thorngren, D. P., Fortney, J. J., & Lopez, E. D. 2015, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1511.07854 Toon, O. B., McKay, C. P., Ackerman, T. P., & Santhanam, K. 1989, Journal of Geophysical Research, 94, 16287 Toon, O. B., Pollack, J. B., & Sagan, C. 1977, Icarus, 30, 663 Visscher, C., Lodders, K., & Fegley, Jr., B. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1060 von Braun, K., Boyajian, T. S., Kane, S. R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 171 Wong, I., Knutson, H. A., Lewis, N. K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 811, 122 Yung, Y. L., Allen, M., & Pinto, J. P. 1984, ApJS, 55, 465 Zahnle, K. J., & Marley, M. S. 2014, ApJ, 797, 41 Zellem, R. T., Lewis, N. K., Knutson, H. A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 53 Zhang, K., & Hamilton, D. P. 2008, Icarus, 193, 267
1901.03074	1	1901	2019-01-10T09:39:40	VIRTIS-H observations of comet 67P's dust coma: spectral properties and color temperature variability with phase and elevation	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We analyze 2-5 micrometre spectroscopic observations of the dust coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko obtained with the VIRTIS-H instrument onboard Rosetta from 3 June to 29 October 2015 at heliocentric distances r_h = 1.24-1.55 AU. The 2-2.5 micrometre color, bolometric albedo, and color temperature are measured using spectral fitting. Data obtained at alpha = 90{\deg} solar phase angle show an increase of the bolometric albedo (0.05 to 0.14) with increasing altitude (0.5 to 8 km), accompanied by a possible marginal decrease of the color and color temperature. Possible explanations include the presence in the inner coma of dark particles on ballistic trajectories, and radial changes in particle composition. In the phase angle range 50-120{\deg}, phase reddening is significant (0.031 %/100 nm/{\deg}), for a mean color of 2 %/100 nm at alpha = 90{\deg}, that can be related to the roughness of the dust particles. Moreover, a decrease of the color temperature with decreasing phase angle is also observed at a rate of ~ 0.3 K/{\deg}, consistent with the presence of large porous particles, with low thermal inertia, and showing a significant day-to-night temperature contrast. Comparing data acquired at fixed phase angle (alpha = 90{\deg}), a 20% increase of the bolometric albedo is observed near perihelion. Heliocentric variations of the dust color are not significant in the analyzed time period. Measured color temperatures are varying from 260 to 320 K, and follow a r^0.6 variation in the r_h = 1.24-1.5 AU range, close to the expected r_h^0.5 value.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. dustprop-VR-accepted January 11, 2019 c(cid:13)ESO 2019 VIRTIS-H observations of comet 67P's dust coma: spectral properties and color temperature variability with phase and elevation. D. Bockelée-Morvan1, C. Leyrat1, S. Erard1, F. Andrieu1, F. Capaccioni2, G. Filacchione2, P.H. Hasselmann1, J. Crovisier1, P. Drossart1, G. Arnold3, M. Ciarniello2, D. Kappel3, A. Longobardo2, M.-T. Capria2, M.C. De Sanctis2, G. Rinaldi2, and F. Taylor4 9 1 0 2 n a J 0 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 4 7 0 3 0 . 1 0 9 1 : v i X r a 1 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Univ. Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 INAF-IAPS, Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, via del fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00133, Rome, Italy 3 Institute for Planetary Research, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Rutherfordstrasse 2, 12489, Berlin, Germany 4 Departement of Physics, Oxford University, Parks Rd, OX13PJ, Regno Unito, Oxford, UK Received ; accepted ABSTRACT We analyze 2 -- 5 µm spectroscopic observations of the dust coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko obtained with the VIRTIS- H instrument onboard Rosetta from 3 June to 29 October 2015 at heliocentric distances rh = 1.24 -- 1.55 AU. The 2 -- 2.5 µm color, bolometric albedo, and color temperature are measured using spectral fitting. Data obtained at α = 90◦ solar phase angle show an increase of the bolometric albedo (0.05 to 0.14) with increasing altitude (0.5 to 8 km), accompanied by a possible marginal decrease of the color and color temperature. Possible explanations include the presence in the inner coma of dark particles on ballistic trajectories, and radial changes in particle composition. In the phase angle range 50 -- 120◦, phase reddening is significant (0.031 %/100 nm/◦), for a mean color of 2 %/100 nm at α = 90◦, that can be related to the roughness of the dust particles. Moreover, a decrease of the color temperature with decreasing phase angle is also observed at a rate of ∼ 0.3 K/◦, consistent with the presence of large porous particles, with low thermal inertia, and showing a significant day-to-night temperature contrast. Comparing data acquired at fixed phase angle (α = 90◦), a 20% increase of the bolometric albedo is observed near perihelion. Heliocentric variations of the dust color are not significant in the analyzed time period. Measured color temperatures are varying from 260 to 320 K, and follow a r0.6 h variation in the rh = 1.24 -- 1.5 AU range, close to the expected r0.5 Key words. comet: general -- comets: individual: 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko -- infrared : planetary systems h value. 1. Introduction The Rosetta mission of the European Space Agency accompa- nied comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (hereafter 67P) be- tween 2014 and 2016 as it approached perihelion (13 August 2015) and receded from the Sun. Several in situ intruments on the Rosetta orbiter were dedicated to the study of the phys- ical and chemical properties of the dust particles released in the coma. The Micro-Imaging Dust Analysis System (MIDAS, Riedler et al. 2007) acquired the 3D topography of 1 to 50 µm sized dust particles with resolutions down to a few nanometers, and showed that dust particles are agglomerates at all scales with the smallest subunit sizes of less than 100 nm (Bentley et al. 2016). A highly porous fractal-like aggregate with a fractal dimension D f = 1.7 was collected (Mannel et al. 2016). The Cometary Secondary Ion Mass Analyzer (COSIMA, Kissel et al. 2007) collected dust particles to image them at a resolution of 14 µm and performed secondary ion mass spectroscopy. Both porous aggregates and more compact particles were observed (Langevin et al. 2016; Merouane et al. 2016). The chemical anal- ysis indicates that these particles are made of 50% organic mat- ter in mass, mixed with mineral phases that are mostly anhy- drous (Bardyn et al. 2017). Carbon is mainly present as macro- molecular material and shows similarities with the Insoluble Or- ganic Matter (IOM) found in carbonaceous chondrites (Fray et al. 2016). The Grain Impact Analyzer and Dust Accumulator (GIADA, Colangeli et al. 2007) measured the scattered light, speed, and momentum of individual particles in the size range of typically 150 -- 800 µm. The majority of the detected dust is described to be porous agglomerates with a mean density of 785+520−115 kg m−3 (Fulle et al. 2017). GIADA also detected very low density, fluffy agglomerates, with properties similar to the MIDAS fractal particles (Fulle et al. 2016). The remote sensing instruments onboard Rosetta provide complementary information on the dust properties by measuring scattered light or thermal emission from particles. From multi- color imaging using the Optical, Spectroscopic, and Infrared Remote Imaging System (OSIRIS, Keller et al. 2007), spectral slopes were measured both for individual particles (Frattin et al. 2017) and for the unresolved dust coma (Bertini et al. 2017). The observed reddening (e.g. typically 11 -- 14 %/100 nm at λ = 0.4 -- 0.7 µm for the diffuse coma, Bertini et al. 2017) is char- acteristic of particles made of absorbing material, e.g. organ- ics (Kolokolova et al. 2004, and references therein). Individual grains (sizes in the range of centimeters to decimeters) display differing spectra, which may be related to variations of the or- Article number, page 1 of 13 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustprop-VR-accepted ganic/silicate ratio and the presence of ice (Frattin et al. 2017). The spectral slopes measured on individual grains display varia- tions with heliocentric and nucleocentric distances that could be related to physical processes in the coma affecting the released material (Frattin et al. 2017). However, spectrophotometric data of the diffuse coma obtained with OSIRIS do not show any trend with heliocentric distance and nucleocentric distance (Bertini et al. 2017). In this paper, we analyze 2 -- 5 µm spectra of continuum radi- ation from the dust coma acquired with the high spectral reso- lution channel of the Visible InfraRed Thermal Imaging Spec- trometer (VIRTIS-H) onboard Rosetta (Coradini et al. 2007). This paper is a follow-up of previous work published by Ri- naldi et al. (2016, 2017) (VIRTIS-M data) and Bockelée-Morvan et al. (2017) (VIRTIS-H data). Whereas those studies provided information on the scattering and thermal properties of 67P's quiescent dust coma at a few dates, namely March-April 2015 and September 2015, we analyze here a comprehensive set of VIRTIS-H data acquired from June to October 2015 (encom- passing perihelion on 13 August 2015), with the heliocentric distance spanning rh = 1.24 -- 1.55 AU. We derive the bolomet- ric albedo and color temperature of the dust coma, as well as the spectral slope between 2 -- 2.5 µm following Gehrz & Ney (1992). These parameters, which have been measured for several comets, depend on the size distribution, porosity, and composition of the dust particles (Kolokolova et al. 2004). Measurements obtained one month after perihelion at rh = 1.3 AU and 90◦ phase angle are consistent with values measured for most comets (Bockelée- Morvan et al. 2017). In this paper, we seek for possible variations with heliocentric distance, altitude, and phase angle. Section 2 presents the data set. The spectral analysis is de- scribed in Sect. 3. Results are given in Sect. 4. A discussion on the observed trends with phase angle and altitude follows in Sect. 5. Appendix B presents expected thermal properties of dust particles, and the model used to interpret the variation of the color temperature with phase angle. 2. The VIRTIS-H data set VIRTIS is composed of two channels: VIRTIS-M, a spectro- imager with a visible (VIS) (0.25 -- 1 µm) and an infrared (IR) (1 -- 5 µm) channel operating at moderate spectral resolution (λ/∆λ = 70-380), and VIRTIS-H, a cross-dispersing spectrometer provid- ing spectra with higher spectral resolution capabilities (λ/∆λ = 1300-3500) in eight orders of diffraction covering the range 1.9 -- 5.0 µm (Table 1) (Drossart et al. 2000; Coradini et al. 2007). The infrared channel of VIRTIS-M underwent a cryocooler failure at the beginning of May 2015. After this date, infrared data were only collected with VIRTIS-H, and we are focusing on these data. As for most Rosetta instruments, the line of sight of VIRTIS- H is along the Z-axis of the spacecraft (S/C). The instantaneous field of view (FOV) of this point instrument is 0.58 × 1.74 mrad2 (the larger dimension being along the Y axis). Details on the cal- ibration process are given in Bockelée-Morvan et al. (2016). The version of the calibration pipeline is CALIBROS -- 1.2 -- 150126. VIRTIS-H acquired data cubes of typically 3 h duration in various pointing modes. For coma studies, the main observing modes were: 1) limb sounding at a given distance from the comet surface along the comet-Sun line; 2) limb sounding at a few stared positions along the comet-Sun line; 3) limb sounding at a few altitudes and azimuthal angles with respect to the comet-Sun direction; 4) raster maps (see examples in Bockelée-Morvan et Article number, page 2 of 13 al. 2016). The data used in this paper were obtained with point- ing modes 1 -- 3. Dust continuum maps obtained from rasters will be the topic of a future paper. We considered data cubes acquired from MTP016/STP058 to MTP024/STP089 covering dates from 30 May 2015 (rh = 1.53 AU) to 30 December 2015 (rh = 2.01 AU), that is, from 74 days before perihelion to 139 days after perihelion. In total 141 data cubes were used, though those acquired after 29 October 2015 turned out to be not appropriate for model fitting of the dust con- tinuum due to low signals (see below). Spectra were obtained by co-adding acquisitions in the coma for which the exposure time was typically 3 s. Since we were interested in studying whether spectral characteristics vary with nucleus distance, we co-added acquisitions by ranges of tangent altitude (hereafter referred as to the elevation) with respect to the nucleus surface. This was done when the signal-to-noise ratio was high enough, and when the elevation significantly varied during the acquisition of the data cube (i.e., for pointing modes 2 -- 3). In total 222 spectra were studied. Figure 1 provides information for each of these spectra regarding the heliocentric distance, the S/C distance to nucleus center (∆), and the S/C-nucleus-Sun angle (referred to as the phase angle). The mean elevation for these spectra is be- tween 0.8 to 21 km, with 64% of the spectra in the 0.8 -- 4 km range, and 30% of the spectra in the 4 -- 10 km range (Fig. 1). For 83% of the spectra, the co-added acquisitions where taken at elevations which differ by less than 0.5 km. For the rest of the spectra, elevations of individual acquisitions differ by less than 1.5 km. For stared limb pointing, variation of elevation with time is observed due to the mutual effects of the complex shape of the 67P rotating nucleus and S/C motion. To define the elevation at which the spectra refer to, we took the weighted mean of the el- evation value of each acquisition, with the weight equal to 1/ρ, where ρ is the distance to nucleus center and is taken equal, for simplicity, to the elevation plus the mean radius of 67P nucleus of 2 km. Indeed column densities are expected to vary with a law close to 1/ρ, so we expect a larger contribution to the signal from acquisitions with a line-of-sight closer to the nucleus. Since the VIRTIS-H faint coma signals are affected by stray light coming from the nearby nucleus, a specific strategy has been implemented to manage these effects. Stray light polluted the low wavelength range of each order, and more significantly order numbered 0, covering the 4 -- 5 µm range (Table 1). Data cubes obtained at small elevations are the most affected by stray light. An algorithm developed for stray light removal was ap- plied (Andrieu et al., in preparation). However, in some cases, the algorithm was not able to remove all the stray light, espe- cially in order 0. Therefore, the different orders (which overlap in wavelength coverage) were merged by selecting the sections of the orders which are not significantly affected by stray light. The selected wavelength ranges for each order (Table 1) allow to reassemble the entire spectrum in the 2 -- 5 µm range. How- ever, the 4.2 -- 4.5 µm section of order 0 is affected by stray light but also by the presence of CO2 fluorescence emissions, so it will not be considered for the analysis of the dust continuum radiation. The degree of stray light pollution was estimated by computing the excess of radiance in order 0 with respect to or- der 1 at wavelengths where these orders overlap (∼ 4.2 µm). We excluded spectra where this excess is larger than 40%. At the junction of the selected ranges of the different orders, spectra with low signal-to-noise ratio show intensity discrepan- cies to varying degrees, due to the instrumental response which is low on the edges of each order. These defects were found to lead to inaccurate results when performing model fitting of the dust continuum radiation. We defined a criterion based on the ratio Bockelée-Morvan et al.: 67P dust coma Table 1. VIRTIS-H diffraction orders and selected wavelengths. order λ coverage selected λ range (µm) 4.049 -- 5.032 3.477 -- 4.325 3.044 -- 3.774 2.703 -- 3.368 2.432 -- 3.077 2.211 -- 2.755 2.024 -- 2.526 1.871 -- 2.331 4.199 -- 5.000a 3.751 -- 4.216 3.340 -- 3.751 3.047 -- 3.344 2.736 -- 3.047 2.506 -- 2.736 2.316 -- 2.507b 2.005 -- 2.311c 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 4.2 -- 4.5 µm range excluded for spectral fitting. b 2.3 -- 2.38 µm range excluded for spectral fitting. c 2.08 -- 2.17 µm range excluded for spectral fitting. of the flux measured at 3 µm in order 4 with respect to the value measured at the same wavelength in order 3. In the initial sample of 222 spectra, this ratio, referred as to T ES T3.0, varies between 0.95 to 2.7, with a value close to 1 indicating a high quality spec- trum. We only considered model fitting results for spectra com- plying T ES T3.0 < 1.35 (173 spectra among the 222). In the fol- lowing sections, we will also discuss results obtained for the best quality spectra fulfilling T ES T3.0 < 1.1 (49 spectra). For these high-quality spectra, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 4.65 µm is in the range 30 -- 80, with a few exceptions (the relevant root mean square is computed on the spectrum from the statistics of the residuals between the observed spectrum and model fit (Sect. 3) in the range 4.5 -- 4.8 µm). The SNRs at 3.3 µm (order 3) and 2.3 µm (order 7) are a factor 3 -- 4 lower. Spectra with SNR at 4.65 µm less than 12 were not considered. After excluding spec- tra with high stray light pollution, at the end, 99 (respectively 49) spectra complying T ES T3.0 < 1.35 (respectively T ES T3.0 < 1.1) where found appropriate for model fitting. The covered time period is -- 71 to +78 d with respect to perihelion (3 June to 29 Oct. 2015, rh = 1.24 to 1.55 AU). The best quality spectra cover dates from -- 43 to +78 d. Table A.1 provides information on these 99 spectra, such as VIRTIS-H observation identification number, start time of the data cube, date with respect to perihe- lion, spacecraft distance to nucleus center, heliocentric distance and phase angle. Figure 2 shows two examples of high quality spectra affected by negligible stray light, obtained for the coma on 22 Jul. 2015 and 8 Aug. 2015 with SNR of respectively 76 and 50 at 4.65 µm. The dust continuum consists of scattered sunlight at λ < 3.5 µm and thermal radiation at longer wavelengths. Fluorescence emis- sion bands of H2O, CO2 and 13CO2 are observed in the 2.5 -- 3.0 µm and 4.2 -- 4.4 µm ranges (see detailed description in Bockelée- Morvan et al. 2015, 2016). 3. Model fitting In order to analyze the dust continuum radiation, we followed the approach presented by Bockelée-Morvan et al. (2017) which consists in modeling the dust spectrum as the sum of scattered solar flux and thermal emission (described by a blackbody func- tion). The free parameters of the model fitting are the color tem- perature Tcol, the spectral index of the reflectance, which allows us to derive the dust color S (cid:48) col in the 2.0 -- 2.5 µm range, and the bolometric albedo A(θ), where θ is the scattering angle (hereafter we will use instead the phase angle α = 180◦ − θ, and assimilate the phase angle to the S/C -- Comet -- Sun angle, which is a good Fig. 1. Geometrical informations for the constituted data set of averaged limb spectra. From top to bottom: S/C-nucleus-Sun angle (referred as to the phase angle), S/C distance to comet center (∆), heliocentric distance (rh), and mean elevation (H) of the line-of-sight. Fig. 2. VIRTIS-H spectra of comet 67P obtained at different elevations above the surface. Cube T1_00396220410 acquired on 22 Jul. 2015 (rh = 1.27 AU) with a mean elevation H = 1.4 km (red line). Cube T1_00397139303 acquired on 8 Aug. 2015 (rh = 1.25 AU) using se- lected acquisitions with H = 6.2 km (black line). The phase angle is ∼89◦ for both spectra. The model fits to the continuum are shown in cyan, with derived parameters (Tcol(K), A, S (cid:48) col(% per 100 nm)) = (295, 0.07, 2.3) and (289, 0.10, 2.2) for the 22 Jul. and 8 Aug. spectra, respec- tively. The spectra fulfill the quality criterion T ES T3.0 < 1.1. approximation given the large S/C distance to the comet). From the color temperature, we can derive the so-called superheating factor S heat, defined as the ratio of the observed color temper- ature Tcol to the equilibrium temperature Tequ of a fast rotating body: Tcol Tequ , S heat = with Tequ = 278r−0.5 h [K], (1) (2) Article number, page 3 of 13 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustprop-VR-accepted only consider statistical noise and not defects in the spectra re- lated, e.g., to the calibration, or possible residual stray light (see Sect. 2). For example, for the fit shown in Fig. 3, 1-σ uncertain- ties are 0.3%, 1%, and 4% for Tcol(K), A and S (cid:48) col, respectively (1-σ confidence levels were derived as explained in Bockelée- Morvan et al. 2017). However, though the noise level is low be- tween 4.5 and 5 µm (SNR = 76), the fit is not fully satisfactory in this spectral region (Fig. 3). There is also a small radiance offset at 3.752 µm, which corresponds to the junction of the selected wavelength ranges in orders 1 and 2 (Table 1). It is important to point out that the retrieved free parameters are somewhat correlated. This is because scattered light and ther- mal emission contribute both to the continuum in a significant fraction of the 2 -- 5 µm spectrum (Fig. 3). A statistical analysis based on contours of equal χ2 shows that Tcol and S (cid:48) col (and con- sequently A) are correlated among them. Dust color and color temperature are negatively correlated, whereas the bolometric albedo and color temperature are positively correlated. As a re- sult, significant flaws somewhere in the spectrum can lead to spurious results which follow this trend (e.g., a lower Tcol com- bined with higher S (cid:48) col, and lower A). Effectively, we observed that spectra fulfilling the quality test T ES T3.0 > 1.1 have lower Tcol, combined with higher S (cid:48) col and lower A, compared to val- ues retrieved for higher quality spectra with T ES T3.0 < 1.1. This will be further discussed in Sect. 4.1. 4. Results Figure 4 shows the bolometric albedo, color, color temperature and superheating factor as a function of date with respect to per- ihelion, for the 99 spectra with T ES T3.0 < 1.35 and stray light excess < 1.4, as explained in Sect. 2. The different points also characterize the 2 -- 5 µm dust emission at various elevations of the line of sight (as indicated by the color code), and phase an- gles (cf overplotted phase information on Fig. 4A, C, D). We recall that the elevation H corresponds to the altitude of the tan- gent point (Sect. 2). The results are also listed in Table A.1. Tcol ranges from 260 K to 320 K, and follows approximately the r−0.5 variation expected from the balance between absorbed h solar radiation and radiated thermal energy (Fig. 4B). The su- perheating factor S heat is typically 1.2 before perihelion (phase angle α of about 90◦). However, strong variations of S heat are observed after perihelion when the Rosetta S/C was flying out of terminator (with α on the order of 60◦ or reaching 120◦). These variations seem to be correlated with changes in the phase angle (Fig. 4C). A strong correlation with phase angle is also observed for the color S (cid:48) col (Fig. 4D). Whereas S heat decreases with in- creasing phase angle, the reverse is observed for the color. As for the bolometric albedo, higher values are measured after peri- helion (Fig. 4A), which is consistent with the phase function of cometary dust, which has a "U" shape with a minimum at α = 90 -- 100◦ (Bertini et al. 2017). However, a trend for higher albe- dos at higher elevations and/or near perihelion is also suggested (Fig. 4A). In the subsequent subsections, we will analyze eleva- tion/time and phase variations of Tcol, A(θ) and S (cid:48) col. We will also study the intensity ratio between scattered light and thermal emission. The reference for scattered light is the radiance mea- sured at λ = 2.44 µm, obtained from the median of the radiances between 2.38 and 2.5 µm (order 6, Table 1). For the thermal emission, the reference is the radiance at λ = 4.6 µm (median of radiances between 4.5 -- 4.7 µm). The intensity ratio fscatt/ ftherm is obtained by ratioing radiances in units of W m−2 sr−1 Hz−1. At constant phase angle, if the dust size distribution and com- Fig. 3. Example of model fit. The spectrum in black is a VIRTIS-H spectrum of comet 67P obtained on 22 Jul. 2015 (T1_00396220410), with the regions excluded for fitting or presenting water and CO2 emis- sion lines not shown (the full spectrum is given in Fig. 2). The model fit to the continuum, which corresponds to the sum of scattered light (plain orange line) and thermal radiation (dashed green line) is shown in red. Retrieved parameters are Tcol = 295 ± 1 K (corresponding to S heat = 1.194 ± 0.003), A = 0.068 ± 0.001, S (cid:48) = 2.3 ± 0.1 % per 100 nm. col where rh is in AU (this unit is used throughout the paper). The definitions of A(θ) and S heat follow the prescription of Gehrz & Ney (1992), which allowed us to compare 67P's dust infrared emission properties to other comets for which these pa- rameters have been measured (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2017). The bolometric albedo A(θ) is approximately equal to the ratio between the scattered energy by the coma to the total incident energy, and scales proportionally to the geometric albedo times the phase function. Further details can be found in Bockelée- Morvan et al. (2017). The dust color (or reddening) is measured in %/100 nm using the dust reflectance at 2.0 µm and 2.5 µm: S (cid:48) col scatt(2.5µm) − Rfit = (2/500) × Rfit Rfit scatt(2.5µm) + Rfit scatt(2.0µm) scatt(2.0µm) , (3) where Rfit length λ divided by the solar flux at λ (Kurucz et al. 1992). scatt(λ) is the fitted scattered light (Fig. 3) at the wave- In the fitting process, the spectral region 4.2 -- 4.5 µm show- ing CO2 emissions and stray light was masked. However, unlike in Bockelée-Morvan et al. (2017), the 3.3 -- 3.6 µm region was kept, as only very faint emission features from organics are ob- served in this region (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2016). The model includes a synthetic H2O fluorescence spectrum (described in Bockelée-Morvan et al. (2015) with a rotational temperature of 100 K) with the total intensity used as free parameter, so the 2.5 -- 3.0 µm region presenting water lines could be considered. Despiking (using median filtering) was applied, removing spikes such as those seen in the spectrum of Fig. 3, though this was not found critical. We checked that the fitting method, which uses the χ2 minimization algorithm of Levenberg-Marquardt, provides correct results by applying it to synthetic spectra to which synthetic noise resembling the noise present in 67P spec- tra was added. Applying our algorithm to the data set presented in Sect. 2, the best fits have a reduced χ2 very close to 1 (0.94 on average). Figure 3 shows an example of a model fit to a high-SNR dust spectrum, with the two components, scattered light and thermal emission, shown separately, and the retrieved free parameters indicated in the caption. The uncertainties in the retrieved pa- rameters are probably somewhat underestimated because they Article number, page 4 of 13 Bockelée-Morvan et al.: 67P dust coma Fig. 4. Bolometric albedo (A), color temperature (B), superheating factor (C) and dust color (D) as a function of time with respect to perihelion. The color of the symbols is according to elevation (as indicated in the colorbar). The phase angle is plotted as a dashed line in plots A, C, and D. The dashed line in plot B) is the color temperature obtained for a value of the superheating factor of 1.19 and a heliocentric variation following r−0.5 h (Eq. 1). The fitted spectra fulfill the condition TEST3.0 < 1.35. h position do not vary with time and in the coma, this ratio is ex- pected to only exhibit a heliocentric dependence proportional to r−2 h /BB(Tcol), where BB is the blackbody function at Tcol which varies as r−0.5 . We corrected the derived intensity ratios from this heliocentric dependence assuming S heat = 1.2 and converted it to the value at 1 AU ( fscatt/ ftherm(1AU)). As discussed at the end of Sect. 3, spectral fitting to spectra presenting some offsets at the junction of the orders can provide inaccurate results. On the other hand, the intensity ratio fscatt/ ftherm(1AU) is directly measured on the spectra, and provides reliable trends. 4.1. Results at 90◦ phase angle In this Section, we only consider measurements obtained at phase angles between 83◦ and 90 ◦ (mean value of 89◦). These data were acquired mainly before perihelion. The color tempera- ture follows Tcol = (338 ± 1)r−0.60±0.01 K in the heliocentric range rh 1.24 -- 1.5 AU. Considering only the best quality data (covering 1.24 -- 1.34 AU), one finds Tcol = (333 ± 3)r−0.51±0.03 K. h h Figure 5 shows the bolometric albedo, color, and superheat- ing factor as a function of elevation H (and rh using a color gradient for the symbols). The results from the highest quality spectra (T ES T3.0 < 1.1) are shown with squares, whereas the other data (1.1 < T ES T3.0 < 1.35) are shown with dots. S heat col have mean values of 1.19±0.01 and 2.0±0.2 % per 100 and S (cid:48) nm, respectively. Lower quality spectra show lower S heat and higher color S (cid:48) col and albedo values that may be inaccurate (see Sect. 3). To test this hypothesis, we performed spectral fitting, fixing the color temperature. We found that an underevaluation of S heat by 4% (S heat=1.15 instead of 1.2) would decrease the de- rived albedo by ∼60%. Effectively the albedo derived for the low quality spectra giving S heat=1.15 is lower by this order of mag- nitude (upper panel of Fig. 5). So, results from these spectra, es- pecially those for which the derived color S (cid:48) col is well above the mean value, are a priori doubtful. On the other hand, the intensity ratio fscatt/ ftherm(1AU), which is proportional to the bolometric albedo, presents a similar behavior with elevation and heliocen- tric distance though discrepancies between high quality and low quality spectra are somewhat smaller (Fig. 6). In conclusion, the trend for an enhanced albedo at low heliocentric distance seen in Fig. 5 is likely real, as well as the trend for increased superheat- ing with decreasing rh. A marginal decrease of S heat and S (cid:48) col with increasing eleva- tion H is suggested (best data), with a Pearson correlation coeffi- cient R of -- 0.34 and -- 0.40, respectively (Fig. 5). We performed a multi regression analysis for studying variations with both rh and altitude. A weak rh variation in r−0.15±0.05 is suggested for S heat, which improves the correlation coefficient with altitude to R = -- 0.55, with S heat ∝ H−0.009±0.003. Multi regression analysis did not provide convincing results for S (cid:48) col: no reliable variation of the color with rh could be identified in this data set. Altogether, h Article number, page 5 of 13 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustprop-VR-accepted Fig. 6. Variation of fscatt/ ftherm(1AU) (deduced from the ratio of the radi- ances at 2.44 µm and 4.6 µm, see text) with elevation H for α = 83 -- 90◦. The color coding and symbols are as for Fig. 5. Data with TEST3.0 < 1.35 are considered. The dashed-dotted and dashed lines correspond to a power law fit for data obtained between -- 71 d and -- 10 d wrt perihelion (∝ H+0.31) and between -- 2 d to 21 d (∝ H+0.22), respectively. Fig. 7. VIRTIS-H spectra of comet 67P obtained at different phase angles (shown in logarithmic scale). Top spectrum (red): cube T1_00399392471 acquired on 28 Aug. 2015 (rh = 1.26 AU, α= ∼72◦) with a mean elevation of 4.1 km. Bottom spectrum (black): cube T1_00400433767 acquired on 7 Sept. 2015 (rh = 1.29 AU, α= ∼120◦) with a mean elevation of 2.2 km. The model fits to the continuum are shown in cyan, with derived parameters (Tcol(K), A, S (cid:48) col(% per 100 nm), S heat) = (304, 0.14, 1.3, 1.23) and (283, 0.09, 2.8, 1.15) for 28 Aug. and 7 Sept., respectively. The spectra fulfill the quality criterion T ES T3.0 < 1.1 and do not present significant stray light. forming a multi regression analysis to fscatt/ ftherm(1AU). Com- paring data acquired between -- 2 d to 21 d wrt perihelion to those acquired before (up to end July 1015), an average increase of 20% of fscatt/ ftherm(1AU) (and hence of the albedo) is suggested (Fig. 6). The variation with elevation follows fscatt/ ftherm(1AU) ∝ H+0.27±0.05, where the power law index is the average of the indexes obtained for the two time periods (Fig. 6). The bolomet- ric albedo measured on the high quality spectra follows the same variation. Fig. 5. Variation of bolometric albedo, superheating factor and color with elevation H. Data obtained with phase angle α = 83 -- 90◦ are con- sidered. The color is a function of the heliocentric distance, as given by the colorbar. Only data with TEST3.0 < 1.35 are plotted. Those with T ES T3.0 < 1.1 are shown with large squares. The dashed lines corre- spond to a power law (for albedo (∝ H−0.39±0.01)) or a linear fit (for su- perheating factor and color) to the data points with T ES T3.0 < 1.1. however, variations of S heat and S (cid:48) AU) are small. col with H and rh (1.24 to 1.35 There is evidence for a significant increase of the bolomet- ric albedo with H (Fig. 5). This is illustrated in Fig. 2, which displays two spectra obtained at H= 1.4 and 6.2 km, the former showing a lower flux ratio fscatt/ ftherm. Since S heat (or Tcol) shows weak variation with H, the increase of A with H reflects the in- crease of fscatt/ ftherm(1AU) with H, shown in Fig. 6. We looked for possible variations of A with rh or seasonal changes, per- Article number, page 6 of 13 Bockelée-Morvan et al.: 67P dust coma 4.2. Phase variations The dust color and color temperature exhibit a strong correlation with phase angle. The dust color is larger at large phase angles (Figs 4C). On the other hand, the reverse is observed for the color temperature, as best seen when looking to the trend followed by the superheating factor (Fig. 4D). Figure 7 compares two spectra acquired with a one week interval at α= 72 and 120◦. The ratios of the thermal emissions in orders 1 (3.7 -- 4.2 µm) and 0 (4.5 -- 5 µm) present subtle differences (by up to 9%) explained by a color temperature higher by 20 K at low phase. The fitting algorithm retrieves also a bluer color at low phase to match the 3.0 -- 3.5 µm radiances. We present in Figs. 8B and C the variations of the color and superheating factor with phase angle. To avoid clutter at α = 90◦, only dates after -- 2 d wrt perihelion are plotted. The phase depen- dences found using the best quality data are ∼ 0.3 K/◦ for Tcol, and 0.031 %/100 nm/◦ for the dust color. Significant variations with elevation are not seen. The bolometric albedo (measured at 2 µm) follows a phase variation which matches the phase function measured at 537 nm by Bertini et al. (2017) during MTP020/STP071 (end August 2015) (Fig. 8A). The VIRTIS data present a large scatter, which prevents further comparison. Note that the dust phase function is expected to be wavelength-dependent. The variation of bolomet- ric albedo with elevation at low phases (α < 80◦) follow a H0.25 law for the best data, similar to the one measured at α = 90◦, but the data show significant scatter with respect to this variation. Phase variations of color and color temperature of cometary dust have never been reported in the literature. From detailed analysis and multiple checks, we can rule out biases related to the fitting algorithm and data quality. Since retrieved parame- ters are somewhat correlated (Sect. 3), another test was to fix the color temperature according to Eq. 1, with S heat fixed to the α = 90◦ value of 1.19 (Sect. 4.1). Despite the increase of the χ2 values, the color trend with phase remains. However, the bolo- metric albedo shows a monotonic slight decrease with decreas- ing phase angle (i.e., no backscattering enhancement), which is unexpected from scattering models, thus reassuring us that the observed phase variations are real. 5. Discussion In summary, analysis of the dust 2 -- 5 µm continuum radiation from 67P's coma shows: i) a mean dust color of 2%/100 nm and superheating factor of 1.19 at 90◦ phase angle, consistent with previous VIRTIS-H measurements (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2017); ii) a factor 2.5 increase of the bolometric albedo with increasing elevation from H = 0.5 to 8 km; iii) an increase of dust color temperature with decreasing phase angle at the rate of ∼ 0.3 K/◦ ; iv) spectral phase reddening at a rate of 0.032 %/100 nm/◦. More marginally, decreasing color temperature and color with increasing H are possibly observed, as well as 20% higher albedo values after perihelion. Fig. 8. Variation of bolometric albedo A (top, A), superheating factor S heat (middle, B) and color S (cid:48) col (bottom, C) with phase angle using data taken after 11 August 2015. Data are from spectra with TEST3.0 < 1.35 with the best data (T ES T3.0 < 1.1) shown with squares. A) The dashed line is the phase function measured during MTP020 by Bertini et al. (2017) (OSIRIS Green filter -- 537 nm). B) The dashed line is a linear fit to S heat data with a slope of -- 0.0014/◦ ( -- 0.33 K/◦ at rh = 1.35 AU). The dashed-dotted line is from the Near Earth Asteroid Thermal Model (NEATM) with beaming parameter η = 1.6, emissivity = 0.9 and rh = 1.35 AU. The solid line is from our dust thermal model (Sec. 5.2) with thermal parameter Θ = 0.1, optical depth fraction of isothermal particles fiso = 0.8, fheat = 1.05, and = 0.9. C) The dashed line is a linear fit to the data giving a phase reddening of 0.032 %/100 nm/◦. Article number, page 7 of 13 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustprop-VR-accepted 5.1. Phase reddening The photometric properties of the dust coma present similarities with the nucleus surface. 67P's nucleus shows a phase redden- ing which has been observed both in the optical (VIS) (0.5 -- 0.8 µm) and in the near-IR (1 -- 2 µm) ranges (Ciarniello et al. 2015; Longobardo et al. 2017; Feller et al. 2016; Fornasier et al. 2016). In the near IR, 67P's nucleus color is 3.9 %/100 nm at α = 90◦, with a phase reddening between 0.013 -- 0.018 %/100 nm/◦ (Cia- rniello et al. 2015; Longobardo et al. 2017). Phase reddening is higher in the VIS (0.04 to 0.1 %/100 nm/◦), with lower values near perihelion associated to a bluing of the surface (Fornasier et al. 2016). For the dust coma, the weighted mean of the VIS values measured by Bertini et al. (2017) using OSIRIS data (ex- cluding spurious MTP026 results) yields 0.025%/100 nm/◦. This is close to the values that we are measuring in the near-IR. How- ever, it should be kept in mind that the VIS values are from data with LOS perpendicular to the nucleus -- S/C vector (Bertini et al. 2017), so they pertain to the dust coma in the near-spacecraft environment, whereas the near-IR values characterise the near- nucleus coma. There are several lines of evidence that the dust properties vary with elevation, as discussed later on. Phase reddening is observed for many Solar System bodies, including zodiacal light (Leinert et al. 1981). For planetary sur- faces, phase reddening can be interpreted as an effect of multi- ple scattering. For dark and porous bodies as 67P, multiple scat- tering is relevant despite the low albedo thanks to the increase of scattering surfaces caused by the roughness of the particles present on the nucleus surface (Schröder et al. 2014). Labora- tory experiments combined with numerical simulations have in- deed highlighted the role of microscopic roughness in producing such a spectral effect (Beck et al. 2012; Schröder et al. 2014). Particle irregularities at a spatial scale less than the wavelength are also invoked to explain the phase reddening seen in the vi- sual for interplanetary dust (10 -- 100 µm sized) (Schiffer 1985). Then, the phase reddening observed in the 67P coma could be related to the porous structure of the particles, providing those contributing to scattered light are sufficiently large. The relative similarity in the phase curves of the dust coma and surface (es- pecially the backscattering enhancement) is consistent with the predominance of large and fluffy dust particles in the coma, as, e.g., discussed by Moreno et al. (2018), Bertini et al. (2019) and Markkanen et al. (2018). Other evidence for relatively large (≥ 10 µm) scatterers in the coma of 67P include dust tail modeling (Moreno et al. 2017) and the unexpected low amount of submi- cron and micron-sized particles collected by the Rosetta's MI- DAS experiment (Mannel et al. 2017). 5.2. Phase variation of the color temperature The color temperature excess with respect to the equilibrium temperature expected for isothermal grains is a common prop- erty of cometary atmospheres. The superheating factor measured for 67P of ∼ 1.2 is in the mean of values observed in other comets (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2017). This temperature excess is usu- ally attributed to the presence of submicrometric grains com- posed of absorbing material (Hanner 2003; Kolokolova et al. 2004). Bockelée-Morvan et al. (2017) showed that this tempera- ture excess could result from the contribution of hot fractal-like aggregates to near-IR thermal emission, these particles having in turn little input to scattered light. In this case, based on Mie mod- eling, the minimum size of the more numerous and more com- pact particles would be ≥ 20 µm (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2017). The observed decrease of the color temperature with increasing Article number, page 8 of 13 phase angle can not be explained by variations of the dust size distribution with solar azimuth angle (Shou et al. 2017), which would induce a phase curve symmetric with respect to α = 90◦. On the other hand, this trend can be caused by non-isothermal grains showing day-to-night thermal contrast. This explanation holds for Saturn's C-ring whose thermal emission shows varia- tions with solar phase angle (Altobelli et al. 2008; Leyrat et al. 2008). To test this hypothesis, in a first approach we used the Near Earth Asteroids Thermal Model (NEATM) (Harris 1998) for describing the variation of the temperature over the surface of comet dust particles. NEATM assumes an idealized non-rotating spherical object with a temperature decreasing from a maximum at the subsolar point to zero at the terminator (there is no night- side emission). For low albedo bodies, the surface temperature at latitude θ(cid:48) -- π/2 and longitude φ(cid:48) (subsolar point at θ(cid:48) = 90◦ and φ(cid:48) = 0◦) follows: NEATM(sin(θ TNEATM = T SS with (cid:48)) cos(φ (cid:48)))0.25, T SS NEATM = 394 r0.5 h (η)0.25 [K], (4) (5) where is the emissivity (taken equal to 0.9), and η is the so- called beaming parameter, which is used in asteroid studies as a calibration coefficient to account for the effects of thermal iner- tia, rotation and surface roughness. T SS NEATM is the temperature at the subsolar point. Thermal emission is calculated considering the surface elements facing the observer and, therefore, depends on the phase angle (Harris 1998). We computed NEATM 3 -- 5 µm spectra for a range of phase angles and η values. By fitting a blackbody to these spectra, we derived color temperatures and, using Eq. 1, the corresponding superheating factors. The phase variation of these computed superheating factors (dashed-dotted curve in Fig. 8B) matches the variation measured for 67P dust, and the mean observed value S heat = 1.19 at α ∼ 90◦ (Sect. 4.1) is obtained for η = 1.58. We determined η for each of the data points shown in Fig. 8B. Inferred η values do not show signif- icant phase dependence and average out at 1.59 ± 0.17. This value is intermediate between the limiting cases η = 1 (high day- to-night contrast due to low thermal inertia, slowly spinning par- ticles, or spin axis along Sun direction) and η = 4 (isothermal particles). This suggests that both isothermal and non-isothermal grains are contributing to 67P dust thermal emission in the 3 -- 5 µm wavelength range. To go further into the interpretation of the data, we devel- oped a simple model (Appendix B), considering a bimodal dis- tribution of dust particles consisting of a mixture of isothermal particles and particles presenting day-to-night temperature con- trast. The diurnal temperature profile of non-isothermal particles is described by the thermal parameter Θ introduced by Spencer et al. (1989), which depends on their thermal properties (which is a function of porosity) and spinning rate. Figure 9 shows ex- amples of diurnal temperature profiles, which computations are described in Appendix B. Expected Θ values for 67P dust parti- cles are also given in Appendix B (Fig. B.1). The relative con- tribution of the isothermal particles to the total optical depth is parameterized by the quantity fiso (in the range 0 -- 1), and their physical temperature Tiso is in excess with respect to the equilib- rium temperature by a factor fheat/0.25. Figure 10 shows the su- perheating factor and the slope of the phase variation of the color Bockelée-Morvan et al.: 67P dust coma Fig. 9. Modelled particles diurnal temperature profiles at equator for different values of the thermal parameter Θ. The subsolar point is at latitude zero and at longitude zero. For large Θ, the temperature reaches the constant isothermal value Tiso. Calculations are for rh = 1.35 AU and =0.9. temperature as a function of Θ for different values of fiso, consid- ering values of fheat of 1.0 and 1.05. The non-monotonic behav- ior of the phase dependence for low Θ and fiso values is because the 3 -- 5 µm wavelength range is more sensitive to high temper- atures (e.g., for high day-to-night temperature contrast, only the warm surface areas contribute to the brightness). Best match to the measurements is obtained for Θ ≤ 2, corresponding to a sig- nificant day-to-night temperature contrast (> 1.5). Such low val- ues of Θ imply slowly spinning particles with high porosity, low thermal inertia or non-spinning particles (Fig. B.1). The relative contribution of isothermal particles is not heavily constrained. For Θ = 2.0, one finds solutions with fiso = 0.2 -- 0.4. On the other hand, for Θ = 0.1, a good fit to the data is obtained for fiso = 0.8 (see Fig. 8). We note that a good fit to the color temperature and its phase variation is obtained providing the physical temperature of the isothermal grains is in excess by 8% with respect to the expected equilibrium temperature (i.e., fheat = 1.05, considering an assumed emissivity of 0.9). Therefore, the presence of non- isothermal grains with day-side surface temperature well above the equilibrium temperature, cannot alone explain the superheat- ing factor observed for cometary dust. As already discussed, a possible explanation is a significant contribution of submicron- sized absorbing grains (Hanner 2003) or, alternatively, of highly porous fractal-like aggregates with sub-micron size monomers, as these particles can be warmer than more compact particles (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2017). A realistic size distribution of the dust particles is obviously not bimodal. It is interesting to estimate the critical radius below which the particles are isothermal, and to compare it to estimated diurnal skin depths (Appendix B, Fig. B.1). Assuming a power law for the size distribution (dN ∝ a−βda, where a is the parti- cle radius), this critical radius acrit depends on the size index β and minimum and maximum sizes of the particles, amin and amax, and can be computed using the inferred relative contribution to the total optical depth of the two populations of particles ( fiso and 1 -- fiso) (see equations in Leyrat et al. 2008). acrit increases with increasing amin, amax and fiso, and with decreasing β. Let us consider size ranges amin = 1 -- 20 µm and amax = 1 -- 10 cm, con- Fig. 10. Superheating factor S heat (A) and phase linear dependence of the color temperature (B) from the thermal model parameterized by the thermal parameter Θ, the optical depth contribution of isothermal par- ticles fiso and their physical temperature Tiso. The shaded areas corre- spond to the measurements in the 67P coma. sistent with constraints obtained for 67P dust (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2017; Mannel et al. 2017; Ott et al. 2017; Schloerb et al. 2017; Moreno et al. 2018; Markkanen et al. 2018). For fiso = 0.8 (solution obtained for Θ = 0.1) and β = 2.5 (respectively β = 3.0), acrit is in the range 0.6 to 6 cm (respectively 0.15 -- 1.7 cm). These values of acrit are on the order of or larger than the estimated diurnal skin depths of ∼ 0.3 cm for slowly spinning and high porosity particles with Θ = 0.1 (Appendix B, Fig. B.1). For fiso = 0.3 (solution obtained for Θ = 2.0), acrit is in the range 0.09 to 0.9 cm (respectively 0.0015 -- 0.02 cm) for β = 2.5 (respectively β = 3.0). For particles with porosity of 0.5 -- 0.9 and spinning rates consistent with Θ = 2.0, we expect diurnal skin depths from 0.01 to 0.3 cm. Altogether, except for size distributions with the opac- ity dominated by small particles (those with β = 3 and amin < 10 µm, or β > 3), we infer that the critical particle size separating isothermal and non-isothermal particles is on the order or larger than the diurnal skin depth. This is a satisfactory result since we expect particles with size smaller than the diurnal skin depth to be isothermal due to internal heat transfer. Article number, page 9 of 13 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustprop-VR-accepted 5.3. Radial variation of the bolometric albedo Measured bolometric albedos for 67P quiescent dust coma range between 0.05 and 0.15 at 90◦ phase angle (Fig. 5) and encom- passe values measured in other comets, as previously discussed by Bockelée-Morvan et al. (2017). These values correspond to a low geometric albedo, and is consistent with dust particles made of dark material (Kolokolova et al. 2004; Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2017, and references therein). The VIRTIS-H observations suggest an increase of the dust bolometric albedo with increas- ing radial distance (Sect. 4). Albedo maps obtained for comets 1P/Halley and 21P/Giacobini-Zinner by combining visible light and thermal infrared images show a similar trend: the albedos in- crease radially from the nucleus, except along the tail, where the albedos are smaller (Telesco et al. 1986; Hammel et al. 1987). Variations in albedo may result from different composition, par- ticle size, shape and structure. For example, large fluffy grains may have reduced albedos because they induce multiple scatter- ing events that allow more light to be absorbed. For this reason, the lower albedos near the nucleus and in the tail of comets 1P and 21P have been interpreted as due to the presence of large, fluffy grains escaping the nucleus with low velocities and con- fined in the orbital planes of the comets (Telesco et al. 1986; Hammel et al. 1987). We may thus invoke an enhanced pro- portion of chunks in the inner coma of 67P, in line with the conclusion obtained by Bertini et al. (2019) from the variation of the backscattering enhancement with nucleocentric distance. During the perihelion period, comet 67P underwent numerous outbursts (Vincent et al. 2016), which likely populated the in- ner coma with large, slowly-moving dust particles, as observed for comet 17P/Holmes after its massive 2007 outburst (Reach et al. 2010; Boissier et al. 2012). In addition, evidence for parti- cles falling back to the nucleus are several (Keller et al. 2017). Models of the density distribution for a coma dominated by grav- itationally bound particles on ballistic trajectories predict an ex- cess of particles in the inner coma with respect to the density expected for free-radial outflow (Chamberlain & Hunten 1987; Gerig et al. 2018). There are some hints of such a deviation from free-radial outflow in OSIRIS optical images (Gerig et al. 2018), which would be amplified if the observed trend for a smaller albedo at smaller cometocentric distances is considered. Devi- ations are also conspicuous for the dust thermal radiation mea- sured in the microwave, which samples essentially large parti- cles, and shows a steep decrease of the column density at impact parameters below 10 km (Schloerb et al. 2017). Whereas we argued previously for radial variations of the optical properties of the individual grains, changes in the par- ticle size distribution may also affect the bolometric albedo of the coma. Anomalously high bolometric albedos were measured in the very active comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp), and during strong jet activity of 1P/Halley, which were found to be corre- lated with a high silicate 10µm-band contrast, and a high su- perheating factor S heat, suggesting that the presence of a large amount of small particles was responsible for these high albe- dos (Tokunaga et al. 1986; Mason et al. 2001; Hanner 2003). Similarly, the rapidly moving 67P outburst ejecta displayed high A and S heat, together with blue colors, characteristics of small particles (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2017). Mie calculations for a porous mixture of olivine and amorphous carbon at 90◦ phase angle predict an increase of A from a value of 0.05, when only particle sizes > 1 µm are considered, to values up to 0.20 when submicron particles are present. However, the increase of A is expected to be correlated with an increase of the superheating factor. This trend between A and S heat with increasing elevation Article number, page 10 of 13 is not observed (Sect. 4, Fig. 5). Therefore, dust fragmentation is likely not responsible for the increase of A with elevation. Changes in the albedo may also be related to a change in the particle composition. Particles made of less absorbing material are expected to be brighter, cooler and bluer. This trend is ob- served with increasing elevation, which would then imply that evaporation of some dark material took place in the inner coma. Evidence for the degradation of grains in the coma of 67P are however still very sparse (e.g., hydrogen halides and glycine are released from dust, De Keyser et al. 2017; Altwegg et al. 2016). Incidentally, we note that, in presence of rapidly subliming (i.e., small and dirty) ice grains, the trend would have been opposite. The VIRTIS-H observations suggest an increase by ∼ 20% of the bolometric albedo in the -2 d to 21 d wrt perihelion pe- riod, when the comet was the most active, possibly associated with an increase of S heat. This trend would be in line with an increased number of small particles at perihelion time, or alter- natively, with enhanced degradation of dark material. The 67P nucleus surface showed a global enhancement of water ice con- tent near perihelion (Ciarniello et al. 2016; Fornasier et al. 2016). The observed A increase would be in line with an expected in- creased amount of icy grains in the inner coma of 67P. On the other hand, this does not explain the trend observed for S heat. h law, close to the r−0.5 6. Summary and conclusion Spectra of the dust 2 -- 4.5 µm continuum radiation have been ac- quired with the VIRTIS-H experiment aboard the Rosetta mis- sion to comet 67P. Through spectral fitting, we measured the dust color temperature, bolometric albedo and 2 -- 2.5 µm color. From the analysis of data acquired from 3 June to 29 Oct. 2015 (rh = 1.24 -- 1.55 AU) at line-of-sight tangent altitudes between 0.5 and 10 km, the following results were obtained: -- At phase angles ∼90◦, the color temperature varied from 260 K to 320 K, and followed a r−0.6 vari- ation expected from the balance between absorbed solar ra- diation and radiated thermal energy. A 20% increase of the bolometric albedo is observed near perihelion. -- A mean dust color of 2%/100 nm and superheating factor of 1.19 are measured at 90◦ phase angle, consistent with previous VIRTIS-H measurements (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2017). -- A decrease of the color temperature with increasing phase angle is observed, at a rate of ∼ 0.3 K/◦. It can be explained by the presence of large porous particles, with low ther- mal inertia, presenting a significant day-to-night temperature contrast. -- A large spectral phase reddening is measured. The value (0.032 %/100 nm/◦) is higher then values measured for the nucleus in the near IR (0.013 -- 0.018 %/100 nm/◦, Ciarniello et al. 2015; Longobardo et al. 2017). This phase reddening can be related to the roughness of the dust particles. h -- The bolometric albedo was found to increase from 0.05 to 0.14 (i.e., by a factor 2.5) with increasing tangent altitude (so-called elevation in the paper) from 0.5 to 8 km. A de- crease of the color temperature and color with increasing al- titude is marginally observed. Possible explanations include the presence in the inner coma of dark particles on ballistic trajectories, and changes in particle composition. -- Evidence for grain fragmentation, or disappearance of icy grains, are not seen. In future papers, we seek exploring the infrared continuum images obtained with VIRTIS-H to obtain further constraints on the dust coma of comet 67P. Bockelée-Morvan et al.: 67P dust coma Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the following institutions and agencies, which supported this work: Italian Space Agency (ASI - Italy), Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES -- France), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR -- Germany), National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA -- USA). VIRTIS was built by a consortium from Italy, France and Ger- many, under the scientific responsibility of the Istituto di As- trofisica e Planetologia Spaziali of INAF, Rome (IT), which lead also the scientific operations. The VIRTIS instrument develop- ment for ESA has been funded and managed by ASI, with con- tributions from Observatoire de Meudon financed by CNES and from DLR. The instrument industrial prime contractor was for- mer Officine Galileo, now Leonardo company in Campi Bisen- zio, Florence, IT. The authors wish to thank the Rosetta Science Ground Segment and the Rosetta Mission Operations Centre for their fantastic support throughout the early phases of the mis- sion. The VIRTIS calibrated data shall be available through the ESA's Planetary Science Archive (PSA) Web site. With fond memories of Angioletta Coradini, conceiver of the VIRTIS in- strument, our leader and friend. D.B.M. thanks E. Lellouch for enlightening discussions. References Altobelli, N., Spilker, L. J., Leyrat, C., & Pilorz, S. 2008, Planet. Space Sci., 56, Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., Bar-Nun, A., et al. 2016, Science Advances, 2, 134 e1600285 Arakawa, S., Tanaka, H., Kataoka, A., & Nakamoto, T. 2017, A&A, 608, L7 Bardyn, A., Baklouti, D., Cottin, H., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S712 Beck, P., Pommerol, A., Thomas, N., et al. 2012, Icarus, 218, 364 Bentley, M. S., Schmied, R., Mannel, T., et al. 2016, Nature, 537, 73 Bertini, I., La Forgia, F., Tubiana, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S404 Bertini, I., Forgia, F. L., Fulle, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 482, 2924 Bockelée-Morvan, D., Debout, V., Erard, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 583, A6 Bockelée-Morvan, D., Crovisier, J., Erard, S., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, S170 Bockelée-Morvan, D., Rinaldi, G., Erard, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S443 (Erratum 2017, MNRAS, 469, S842) Boissier, J., Bockelée-Morvan, D., Biver, N., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A73 Chamberlain, J. W., & Hunten, D. M. 1987, International Geophysics Series, 2nd Ed. Academic Press, 36 Ciarniello, M., Capaccioni, F., Filacchione, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 583, A31 Ciarniello, M., Raponi, A., Capaccioni, F., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, S443 Colangeli, L., Lopez-Moreno, J. J., Palumbo, P., et al. 2007, Space Sci. Rev., Consolmagno, G. J., Schaefer, M. W., Schaefer, B. E., et al. 2013, 128, 803 Planet. Space Sci., 87, 146 Coradini, A., Capaccioni, F., Drossart, P., et al. 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 128, 529 De Keyser, J., Dhooghe, F., Altwegg, K., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S695 Drossart, P., et al., 2000, SPIE, 4131, 78 Feller, C., Fornasier, S., Hasselmann, P. H., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, S287 Fornasier, S., Mottola, S., Keller, H. U., et al. 2016, Science, 354, 1566 Frattin, E., Cremonese, G., Simioni, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S195 Fray, N., Bardyn, A., Cottin, H., et al. 2016, Nature, 538, 72 Fulle, M., Ivanovski, S. L., Bertini, I., et al. 2015, A&A, 583, A14 Fulle, M., Altobelli, N., Buratti, B., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, S2 Fulle, M., Della Corte, V., Rotundi, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S45 Gehrz, R. D., & Ney, E. P. 1992, Icarus, 100, 162 Gerig, S.-B., Marschall, R., Thomas, N., et al. 2018, Icarus, 311, 1 Hammel, H. B., Telesco, C. M., Campins, H., et al. 1987, A&A, 187, 665 Hanner, M. 2003, J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf., 79, 695 Harris, A. W. 1998, Icarus, 131, 291 Ivanovski, S. L., Zakharov, V. V., Della Corte, V., et al. 2017a, Icarus, 282, 333 Ivanovski, S. L., Della Corte, V., Rotundi, A., et al. 2017b, MNRAS, 469, S774 Keller, H. U., Barbieri, C., Lamy, P., et al. 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 128, 433 Keller, H. U., Mottola, S., Hviid, S. F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S357 Kissel, J., Altwegg, K., Clark, B. C., et al. 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 128, 823 Kolokolova, L., Hanner, M. S., Levasseur-Regourd, A.-C., & Gustafson, B. Å. S. 2004, Comets II, 577 Kurucz R. L., 1992, in Rabin D. M., Jefferies, J. T., eds, Proc. IAU Symp. Vol. 154, Synthetic Infrared Spectra in Infrared Solar Physics. Kluwer, Dordrecht Langevin, Y., Hilchenbach, M., Ligier, N., et al. 2016, Icarus, 271, 76 Le Gall, A., Leyrat, C., Janssen, M. A., et al. 2014, Icarus, 241, 221 Leinert, C., Richter, I., Pitz, E., & Planck, B. 1981, A&A, 103, 177 Leyrat, C., Ferrari, C., Charnoz, S., et al. 2008, Icarus, 196, 625 Longobardo, A., Palomba, E., Capaccioni, F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S346 Markkanen J., Agarwal J., Väisänen T., Penttilä A., Muinonen K., 2018, ApJ, Macke, R. J., Consolmagno, G. J., & Britt, D. T. 2011, Meteoritics and Planetary 868, L16 Science, 46, 1842 Mannel T., Bentley M. S., Schmied R., Jeszenszky H., Levasseur-Regourd A. C., Romstedt J., Torkar K., 2016, MNRAS, 462, S304 Mannel, T., Bentley, M. S., Boakes, P., et al. 2017, European Planetary Science Mason C. G., Gehrz R. D., Jones T. J., Woodward C. E., Hanner M. S., Williams Congress, 11, EPSC2017-258 D. M., 2001, ApJ, 549, 635 Merouane, S. et al., 2016, A&A, 596, A87 Moreno, F., Muñoz, O., Gutiérrez, P. J., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S186 Moreno, F. et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 237 Opeil, C. P., Consolmagno, G. J., & Britt, D. T. 2010, Icarus, 208, 449 Ott, T., Drolshagen, E., Koschny, D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S276 Reach, W. T., Vaubaillon, J., Lisse, C. M., Holloway, M., & Rho, J. 2010, Icarus, 208, 276 Riedler, W., Torkar, K., Jeszenszky, H., et al. 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 128, 869 Rinaldi, G., Fink, U., Doose, L., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, S547 Rinaldi, G., Della Corte, V., Fulle, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S598 Schiffer, R. 1985, A&A, 148, 347 Schloerb, F. P., Gulkis, S., Biver, N., et al. 2017, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #49, 49, 415.06 Schröder, S. E., Grynko, Y., Pommerol, A., et al. 2014, Icarus, 239, 201 Shou, Y., Combi, M., Toth, G., et al. 2017, ApJ, 850, 72 Spencer, J. R., Lebofsky, L. A., & Sykes, M. V. 1989, Icarus, 78, 337 Telesco, C. M., Decher, R., Baugher, C., et al. 1986, ApJ, 310, L61 Tokunaga A. T., Golisch W. F., Griep D. M., Kaminski C. D., & Hanner M. S. 1986, AJ, 92, 1183 Vincent, J.-B., A'Hearn, M. F., Lin, Z.-Y., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, S184 Appendix A: Table A.1. Log of VIRTIS-H observations and retrieved dust spectral and temperature properties. (This Table is not available in the present version.) Appendix B: Thermal model for dust particles A simple approach, inherited from asteroid studies, is used to model the particle surface temperature as a function of local time. Spencer et al. (1989) showed that, for smooth objects with the Sun in the equatorial plane, the diurnal temperature profile can be parameterized by a quantity Θ called thermal parameter. Θ is function of the thermal inertia Γ, angular rotation rate ω, subsolar equilibrium temperature TSS, emissivity , and Stefan- Boltzmann constant σ: √ Γ ω σT 3 SS , Θ = with (cid:113) (B.1) (B.2) KC∗ p, Γ = where K is the thermal conductivity and C∗ heat capacity. p is the volumetric The subsolar equilibrium temperature for dark and smooth objects is given by: TSS = 394 r0.5 h ()0.25 [K]. (B.3) Article number, page 11 of 13 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustprop-VR-accepted Spencer et al. (1989) provide diurnal temperature profiles on the equator as a funtion of Θ. In their Fig. 2, they show the variation of TMAX/TSS, TMIN/TSS with Θ, where TMAX and TMIN are respectively the maximum and minimum surface tempera- tures, and TSS the subsolar temperature for a non-rotating body (Eq. B.3). We described the surface temperature at latitude θ(cid:48) -- π/2 and longitude φ(cid:48) (subsolar point at equator, i.e., θ(cid:48) = 90◦ and φ(cid:48) = 0◦) by: (cid:16) Tday(θ max (cid:48) , Θ) = (cid:48) , φ TMAX(Θ)(sin(θ (cid:48)) cos(φ (cid:48)))0.25, Tnight(θ (cid:48) (cid:48) , φ , Θ) (cid:17) (B.7) (cid:48) (cid:48) , φ (cid:48))0.25, , Θ) = TMIN(Θ) sin(θ Tnight(θ (B.8) where θ(cid:48) is in the range (0, π), and φ(cid:48) is in the range ( -- π, π). This (θ(cid:48), φ(cid:48)) dependence corresponds to NEATM for Θ = 0, and should approximate well the temperature distribution when Θ > 0, except that the shift of the maximum temperature in the af- ternoon for nonzero Θ is not represented. TMAX(Θ) and TMIN(Θ) were taken from Spencer et al. (1989). Figure 9 shows diurnal temperature curves for different Θ. We then computed the 3 -- 5 µm thermal emission as a func- tion of phase angle, considering the surface elements facing the observer (cf. NEATM model from Harris (1998)). We used a bi- modal distribution for the grains, consisting of isothermal grains at T =Tiso (e.g., rapidly spinning dust particles, or grains with size smaller than δtherm), and slowly spinning/low thermal inertia particles, with a temperature profile described by Θ (Eq B.7 -- B.8). This approach follows the one adopted by Leyrat et al. (2008) to explain the phase variation of the color temperature of Saturn's C ring. The relative contribution of isothermal particles is given by fiso, which determines the optical depth contribution of isothermal particles ( fiso = τiso/(τiso + τnon−iso)). The optical depth is proportional to the integral over size range of the size distribution times particle cross-section (e.g. Leyrat et al. 2008). The temperature of the isothermal particles is expressed as: Tiso = fheatTequ 0.25 , (B.9) where Tequ, which corresponds to the equilibrium temperature for an emissivity equal to 1, is given in Eq. 1. The parameter fheat allows us to investigate dust particles heated above the equilib- rium temperature. This temperature excess is expected for small particles made of absorbing material (Kolokolova et al. 2004, and references therein). Table B.2 summarizes the free parameters of the model for computing synthesized spectra of dust thermal emission. By fit- ting a blackbody function to these spectra, the superheating fac- tor as a function of phase angle can be derived and compared to VIRTIS-H measurements. Objects with higher Θ will have lower day-to-night temper- ature contrast, lower subsolar temperature and maximum tem- perature in the afternoon. Objects with low thermal inertia and low rotation rate have low Θ, so high temperature contrasts with maximum temperature near midday. The diurnal skin depth is given by (Le Gall et al. 2014): (cid:114) δtherm = Γ C∗ p 2 ω . (B.4) The surface becomes isothermal with time of the day and depth for Θ > 50 (Spencer et al. 1989). However, diurnal tempera- ture profiles parameterized by Θ (Spencer et al. 1989) are in- valid for objects with sizes in the range or lower than the diurnal skin depth δtherm. Due to solar heat penetration, they should be isothermal. We computed Θ and δtherm for a range of parameters appropriate to 67P porous dust aggregates (Table B.1). The ther- mal conductivity Kmat, specific heat capacity Cp, and volumet- ric density ρmat of the material composing the monomers (i.e., subunits) correspond to values measured for carbonaceous mete- orites. The adopted ρmat value is also consistent with estimations of the compacted bulk density of 67P dust particles (Fulle et al. 2017). The volumetric heat capacity and thermal conductivity of the aggregates depend on their porosity φ. We have: p = Cp(1 − φ)ρmat. C∗ For the thermal conductivity, we used the empirical formula derived by Arakawa et al. (2017) for highly porous dust aggre- gates, giving: (B.5) K = ckKmat(1 − φ)2. (B.6) The coefficient of proportionality ck is given in Arakawa et al. (2017). Comparing with laboratory measurements, Arakawa et al. (2017) found that this porosity dependence can be used for φ > 0.5. The thermal conductivity of aggregates derived from this empirical formula is K = 0.00714 to 0.000285 W m−1 K−1 for φ = 0.5 to 0.9. Rotation frequencies (ω/2π) of 67P grains have been es- timated by dust dynamical simulations (Fulle et al. 2015; Ivanovski et al. 2017a,b), and also measured using the light curves of individual dust particles (Fulle et al. 2015). Computed values for > 100 µm size particles range from 0.03 -- 4 Hz depend- ing of grain characteristics (shape, size and density), gas flow en- vironment and initial conditions (Fulle et al. 2015; Ivanovski et al. 2017a). Measurements in the low activity phase of the comet show that the most probable rotation frequency of the grains is below 0.15 Hz (Fulle et al. 2015). The simulations show that par- ticles experience oscillations before acquiring a full rotation at a few kilometers from the surface, with the rotation axis perpen- dicular to the flow direction. Modeling the surface temperature of oscillating grains is beyond the scope of this paper. The thermal parameter, diurnal skin depth and thermal iner- tia for porosities of 0.5 -- 0.9 and rotation frequencies of 0.0001 -- 0.1 Hz are shown in Fig. B.1. Calculations were performed with the parameters given in Table B.1. Thermal inertias are low (8 -- 80 J m−2 K−1 s−1/2). The diurnal skin depth ranges from ∼ 0.01 to 0.5 cm, and the thermal parameter varies from less than 1 (strong day-to-night contrast) for slowly rotating grains to val- ues ∼ 30 for relatively compact aggregates (φ = 0.5) with rota- tion frequency of 0.1 Hz. Article number, page 12 of 13 Table B.1. Model fixed parameters. Bockelée-Morvan et al.: 67P dust coma Value Note CM chondrites Parameter Aggregate subunits: Thermal conductivity Kmat (W/m/K) Heat capacity (J/kg/K) Density (kg/m3) Aggregate Emissivity a Opeil et al. (2010) b Consolmagno et al. (2013) c Macke et al. (2011) 300 K -- Chondrites 2420c Orgueil 0.9 0.7a 700b Cp ρmat Table B.2. Model free parameters. Parameter Description Phase angle α Thermal parameter Θ fiso Optical depth contribution of isothermal particles Factor to equilibrium temperature of isothermal particles fheat Fig. B.1. Thermal parameter Θ, diurnal skin depth δtherm and thermal inertia Γ as a function of particle rotation frequency. The different curves correspond to different porosities, with values indicated on the plots. Article number, page 13 of 13
1605.06291	1	1605	2016-05-20T11:13:43	Dust Impact Monitor (SESAME-DIM) on board Rosetta/Philae: Millimetric particle flux at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The Philae lander of the Rosetta mission, aimed at the in situ investigation of comet 67P/C-G, was deployed to the surface of the comet nucleus on 12 Nov 2014 at 2.99 AU heliocentric distance. The Dust Impact Monitor (DIM) as part of the Surface Electric Sounding and Acoustic Monitoring Experiment (SESAME) on the lander employed piezoelectric detectors to detect the submillimetre- and millimetre-sized dust and ice particles emitted from the nucleus. We determine the upper limit of the ambient flux of particles in the measurement range of DIM based on the measurements performed with the instrument during Philae's descent to its nominal landing site Agilkia at distances of about 22 km, 18 km, and 5 km from the nucleus barycentre and at the final landing site Abydos. The geometric factor of the DIM sensor is calculated assuming an isotropic ambient flux of the submillimetre- and millimetre-sized particles. For the measurement intervals when no particles were detected the maximum true impact rate was calculated by assuming Poisson distribution of the impacts, and it was given as the detection limit at a 95% confidence level. Based on measurements performed with DIM, the upper limit of the flux of particles in the measurement range of the instrument was of the order of $10^{-8}-10^{-7}m^{-2}s^{-1}sr^{-1}$ during descent and $1.6\cdot10^{-9}m^{-2}s^{-1}sr^{-1}$ at Abydos on 13 and 14 Nov 2014. Considering particle speeds below escape velocity, the upper limit for the volume density of particles in the measurement range of DIM was constrained to $10^{-11}m^{-3}-10^{-12}m^{-3}$. Results of the calculations performed with the GIPSI tool on the expected particle fluxes during the descent of Philae were compatible with the non-detection of compact particles by the DIM instrument.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. AA_postprint September 13, 2018 c(cid:13)ESO 2018 Dust Impact Monitor (SESAME-DIM) on board Rosetta/Philae: Millimetric particle flux at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko Attila Hirn1,2,(cid:63), Thomas Albin3,4,2, István Apáthy1, Vincenzo Della Corte5, Hans-Herbert Fischer6, Alberto Flandes7,2, Alexander Loose2, Attila Péter1, Klaus J. Seidensticker8, and Harald Krüger2 Hungary D.F. Germany 6 1 0 2 y a M 0 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 1 9 2 6 0 . 5 0 6 1 : v i X r a 1 Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Konkoly Thege Miklós út 29-33, 1121 Budapest, 2 Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany 3 Institut für Raumfahrtsysteme, University Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 29, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany 4 Medical Radiation Physics, Faculty VI, Carl von Ossietzky University, Georgstrasse 12, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany 5 Institute for Space Astrophysics and Planetology (IAPS), National Institute for AstroPhysics (INAF), Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Roma, Italy Köln, Germany 6 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Raumflugbetrieb und Astronautentraining, MUSC, Linder Höhe, 51147 7 Ciencias Espaciales, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán 04510, México, 8 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Planetenforschung, Rutherfordstrasse 2, 12489 Berlin, Received; accepted ABSTRACT Context. The Philae lander of the Rosetta mission, aimed at the in situ investigation of comet 67P/Churyumov- Gerasimenko, was deployed to the surface of the comet nucleus on 12 November 2014 at 2.99 AU heliocentric dis- tance. The Dust Impact Monitor (DIM) as part of the Surface Electric Sounding and Acoustic Monitoring Experiment (SESAME) on the lander employed piezoelectric detectors to detect the submillimetre- and millimetre-sized dust and ice particles emitted from the nucleus. Aims. We determine the upper limit of the ambient flux of particles in the measurement range of DIM based on the measurements performed with the instrument during Philae's descent to its nominal landing site Agilkia at distances of about 22 km, 18 km, and 5 km from the nucleus barycentre and at the final landing site Abydos. Methods. The geometric factor of the DIM sensor was calculated assuming an isotropic ambient flux of the submillimetre- and millimetre-sized particles. For the measurement intervals when no particles were detected the maximum true impact rate was calculated by assuming Poisson distribution of the impacts, and it was given as the detection limit at a 95% confidence level. The shading by the comet environment at Abydos was estimated by simulating the pattern of illumination on Philae and consequently the topography around the lander. Results. Based on measurements performed with DIM, the upper limit of the flux of particles in the measurement range of the instrument was of the order of 10−8 − 10−7m−2s−1sr−1 during descent. The upper limit of the ambient flux of the submillimetre- and millimetre-sized dust and ice particles at Abydos was estimated to be 1.6 · 10−9m−2s−1sr−1 on 13 and 14 November 2014. A correction factor of roughly 1/3 for the field of view of the sensors was calculated based on an analysis of the pattern of illumination on Philae. Conclusions. Considering particle speeds below escape velocity, the upper limit for the volume density of particles in the measurement range of DIM was constrained to 10−11 m−3 − 10−12 m−3. Results of the calculations performed with the GIPSI tool on the expected particle fluxes during the descent of Philae were compatible with the non-detection of compact particles by the DIM instrument. Key words. Rosetta -- Philae -- comets -- cometary dust -- piezoelectric detectors -- 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko 1. Introduction to comet After its more 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko 67P/C-G), the Rosetta spacecraft (Glassmeier et al. 2007) reached its target on the 6 August 2014 to start a series of in situ measurements from around the nucleus. In addition cruise (hereafter than 10-year (cid:63) contact address: e-mail: [email protected] to the 11 orbiter experiments, Rosetta also carried a lander, named Philae (Bibring et al. 2007), which was deployed onto the surface of the nucleus of the comet on 12 November 2014 (Biele et al. 2015). The Dust Impact Monitor (DIM) of the Surface Electric Sounding and Acoustic Monitoring Experiment (SESAME) package (Seidensticker et al. 2007) on board the lander was one of the instruments that were active and operating not Article number, page 1 of 17 A&A proofs: manuscript no. AA_postprint only during the first few days after the landing of Philae (first science sequence -- FSS) on the nucleus surface at the final landing site Abydos, but also during the sepa- ration, descent, and landing (SDL) phase of the mission. The DIM instrument was designed to measure the flux of submillimetre- and millimetre-sized dust and ice particles emitted from the nucleus by means of 3 × 3 piezoelectric sensor segments made of PNZT7700 (Pb, Ni, Zi, Ti, here- after referred to as PZT) and mounted on three sides of a cube. From the signal properties measured with the as- sociated SESAME common electronics, the mass and the speed of the impacting particles could be constrained as- suming given density and elastic material properties. Since the sensor sides are oriented in three mutually orthogo- nal directions, an assessment of the directionality of the impacting particles might be also made provided that the number of impacts is statistically sufficient (Seidensticker et al. 2007; Flandes et al. 2013, 2014). DIM was operated during three mission phases of Philae at the comet (Krüger et al. 2015): before separation, during descent, and at the final landing site. In the mission phase before Philae's separation from Rosetta, at altitudes be- tween approximately 8 and 23 km from the nucleus surface, DIM was significantly obscured by structures of Rosetta and no particles were detected. During Philae's descent to its nominal landing site Agilkia, DIM detected one approx- imately millimetre-sized particle at an altitude of 2.4 km. This is the closest ever detection at a cometary nucleus by a dedicated in situ dust detector. The material properties of the detected particle are compatible with a porous particle having a bulk density of approximately 250 kg m−3. At Phi- lae's final landing site, Abydos, DIM detected no particle impacts. In this paper we present upper limits of the flux of parti- cles in the measurement range of the DIM instrument in the two operational phases after the release of Philae. Phases preceding the release are not considered in our analysis be- cause of the complexity of the shielding geometry and a reduced geometric factor of the shaded sensors. Measure- ments of the particle flux on the orbiter are provided by the Grain Impact Analyser and Dust Accumulator (GIADA) team for this period with much greater sensitivity and a different measurement range (Della Corte et al. 2015; Ro- tundi et al. 2015). We discuss in detail the effects of shading by the detector frame and the body of the lander on the geometric factor of the DIM sensor, and also address the effects of the local environent. A rough estimation on the upper limit of the volume density of particles in DIM's mea- surement range is presented. 2. Dust Impact Monitor 2.1. Detector geometry The DIM cube of dimensions 71.5 mm× 71.5 mm× 69.0 mm is mounted on the top face of the lander, above Philae's balcony, with sensor sides pointing in the +X, +Y, and +Z directions in the Philae coordinate system (Fig. 1). The -X and -Y sides are covered with aluminum plates, whereas the -Z side is left open for cabling and mounting purposes. The three PZT segments on the active sides have dimensions 50.0 mm × 16.2 mm × 1.0 mm and they are separated by 1.5 mm (Fig. 2). They all lie 2.3 mm below the frame of the DIM cube. Impacts incident on different sensor segments Article number, page 2 of 17 belonging to a given sensor side are not distinguished by the electronics. The PZT segments are significantly shaded by Philae's structure and by the sensor frame; the amount of shad- ing differs from one side of the sensor to the other (see Fig. 1). The field of view (FoV) of the +X side is limited mostly to the +Z direction owing to the structure of the lander. However, the +Y sensor side, being closer to the edge of the structure, is only partially shielded, mostly by Solar Array Panel 1, for particles approaching from the -- Z half-space. Because it is close to the drill box of the drill, sample, and distribution (SD2) subsystem protuding ap- proximately 150 mm above Philae's solar hood and 75 mm above DIM's Z side (see Fig. 1), the +Z sensor side is also partially shielded from particles coming from the (-X; -Y; +Z) region, but that side is still the least shielded of the three active sides of DIM. 2.2. Measurement technique When a PZT segment on DIM is hit by a particle, the sen- sor generates a damped, closely sinusoidal electrical signal. Calibration measurements performed on the ground with different types of test particles impacting on the DIM sensor at different speeds (Péter 2002; Flandes et al. 2013, 2014) have shown that the impacts can be described and analysed using the Hertz theory of contact mechanics (Hertz 1882; Johnson 2003). After recording the amplitude (Um) and the width of the first half-sine pulse (Tc), it is possible to con- strain the radius R and the impact speed v of the particle (Seidensticker et al. 2007; Flandes et al. 2013) according to Eqs. 1 and 2, Um = 3.03d33E0.4 r ρ0.6R2v1.2 C (cid:33)1/5 , , (1) (2) (cid:32) R5ρ2 vE2 r Tc = 5.09 where d33 is the piezoelectric stress constant of the PZT, Er the combined reduced Young's modulus of the sensor and the impinging particle, ρ the density of the impacting particle, and C the capacitance of the sensor plate. The signals coming from the sensor segments are first amplified with a logarithmic amplifier. The instrument de- tects a signal only if the amplified signal crosses an adap- tive detection threshold voltage defined as the sum of an adjustable margin and the signal average determined by the DIM electronics with a time constant of approximately 1 s. The margin can be increased in steps of 10 dB in the range from 10 dB to 70 dB. Each step changes the thresh- old voltage by approximately 0.3 V. If the amplified signal crosses the detection threshold less than 1 ms after the sin- gle event measurement is initialized, the signal is classified as a "false event", else it is accepted as the beginning of a potential real impact. If no second threshold crossing is detected within a time interval pre-defined for the given op- erational mode, the event is ruled out as a "long event". A new single event measurement is initialized only after some waiting and latency periods adding up to a total instrument dead time of approximately 10 ms. A more detailed descrip- tion of the DIM signal processing is given in Péter & Lucás A. Hirn et al.: Estimation of particle flux based on SESAME-DIM measurements (2001); Fischer (2014) and Krüger et al. (2015). Flandes et al. (2013) have shown that signals with amplitudes in the interval 0.2 mV < Um < 15 mV deliver measurement val- ues within the expected theoretical behaviour and from this they have determined an approximated experimental range of detection radii based on Eq. 1 (Krüger et al. 2015). The intervals are reported for the different operational modes in Sects. 2.3.1 and 2.3.2. 2.3. Operation After Rosetta's launch in March 2004, the health and the performance of the DIM instrument were regularly checked and interference tests were executed in the frame of payload check-outs performed approximately every six months until the spacecraft entered deep space hibernation in 2011. After the wake-up of Rosetta and its lander Philae in 2014, fur- ther tests were performed in order to guarantee that DIM was working properly. A detailed description of these op- erations (health-checks, tests, and measurements) is given in Fischer (2012) and Krüger et al. (2015) and the cor- responding SESAME Lander Instrument Operations Re- quests (LIOR) documents. In the present paper we focus exclusively on the measurement modes used in the SDL and FSS phases of the mission. 2.3.1. Measurement mode during the separation, descent, and landing phase During the SDL phase, measurements were performed in the so-called Burst Continuous Test2 mode (BCT2). This measurement mode delivers the measured raw peak am- plitude Um, the impact duration Tc, and the time of de- tection for the first 350 detected events on a given sensor side. The total number of detected events, false events, and long events are also recorded. On 12 November 2014, after Philae's separation from Rosetta at 08:35:00 UTC, three measurement blocks were conducted at distances of about 22 km, 18 km, and 5 km from the nucleus barycentre. In each block all three sensor sides were operated. Measure- ment times were 100 s or 200 s. During the tests of the descent with the Philae ground reference model performed at the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR) in Cologne, a cross-talk with the Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) electronics of the solar arrays was identified, which resulted in a high rate of false signals interpreted as detected events by the DIM electronics. For the most part, these events were recorded for only a few seconds at the beginning of the blocks. The same behaviour could be observed in the flight data, which means that those measurements in which the number of false signals exceeded 350 could not be used for detecting particle impacts. The detection intervals in terms of particle radius for BCT2 measurements during Philae's descent were [0.5 mm − 6.5 mm] and [0.9 mm − 6.5 mm] for margin levels of 40 dB and 50 dB, respectively, used during these mea- surement blocks (Krüger et al. 2015). 2.3.2. Measurement mode during the first science sequence phase In the measurement blocks of the FSS DIM was operated in Burst Continuous (BC) mode. The BC mode delivers the counts for impacts with a particular [Um, Tc] combination. The Um and Tc values are stored in a compressed way in memory cells of different sizes, depending on the expected frequency of such events. The event times are not registered by the instrument. Each BC mode measurement lasted for 557−558 s; mar- gins were set either to 30 dB with radius detection interval [0.25 mm−1.5 mm] or 40 dB with [0.5 mm−1.5 mm](Krüger et al. 2015). 3. Methods 3.1. Maximum impact rates Provided that only one real impact was registered by DIM during the scientific measurements in the SDL and the FSS phases, it is reasonable to assume an isotropic distribution of the particle trajectories. Moreover, we can suppose that the impacts on the DIM sensor are independent events, hence we can also assume that their occurrence follows a Poisson distribution. For the periods when no detection was made, we seek the detection limit, i.e. the value of the pa- rameter λ of the Poisson distribution for which there is an arbitrarily chosen 95% (2σ) probability that the number of detected events N will exceed zero in a single measurement P (N > 0) = 1 − P (N = 0) = 1 − λ0 exp(−λ) = 1 − exp(−λ) = 0.95 , (3) = (0)! thus λ = − ln(0.05) ≈ 3 . (4) For the measurement block, when exactly one real sig- nal was detected, again, only the upper limit of the ambient flux can be estimated. We can define the upper limit of the expected number of impacts as the highest value of λ for which there is a 5% probability that the number of the de- tected events N will be less than 2 in a single measurement: P (N < 2) = P (N = 0) + P (N = 1) = = (1 + λ) exp(−λ) = 0.05 , resulting in λ ≈ 4.74 . (5) (6) 3.2. Geometric factor of the DIM sensor The relation between the measured impact rates (N in s−1) and the particle flux (Φ in m−2s−1sr−1) in the measurement range of the sensor is given by N = GΦ , (7) where G is the geometric factor of the detector in m2sr. Article number, page 3 of 17 A&A proofs: manuscript no. AA_postprint 3.2.1. Stand-alone PZT segment First we consider only one single PZT segment in the XY plane. The geometric factor is given as the sum of the ef- fective areas seen from different directions. For an isotropic particle flux coming from the Z > 0 half-space, G0 = πA, where A = W L is the surface area of one PZT segment (Fig. 2). 3.2.2. Shading effect of the frame The outer structure of the DIM sensor that frames the PZTs produces significant shading for particles incident to the sensitive surface under highly oblique angles. The surface of the sensor segments lies 2.3 mm below the outer surface of the frame, which is significant compared to the dimensions of the segments (W = 16 mm; L = 50 mm). For example, if particles come along a direction for which φ = 0◦ and θ > 87◦, or likewise, for which φ = 90◦ and θ > 82◦ the sensor frame completely prevents the particles from reaching the PZT (see Fig. 2). The geometric factor, in this case, can be calculated an- alytically and it is identical to the geometric factor of a radiation detector having rectangular telescope geometry. Thomas & Willis (1972) derived an analytical formula for the general case of two rectangular areas having sides of length 2X1, 2Y1 and 2X2, 2Y2 with Z being their sepa- ration. The geometry of one DIM PZT segment with the sensor frame around it corresponds to the special case of equal rectangular areas with dimensions 2X1 = 2X2 = L and 2Y1 = 2Y2 = W ; the separation between the two areas is identical to the depth of the frame Z = d. The geometric factor Gf then can be expressed as √ Gf = 2L √ d2 + W 2 arctan L√ d2 + W 2 − 2Ld arctan L d + +2W d2 + L2 arctan W√ d2 + L2 − 2W d arctan W d + +d2 ln (d2 + W 2)(d2 + L2) (d2 + W 2 + L2)d2 . (8) If we calculate the limit of Gf as d tends to 0, we get Gf = G0. 3.2.3. Shading by the structure of Philae In order to consider the shading effects of Philae's struc- ture and the other payloads on the DIM's FoV, numerical simulations were performed with a virtual isotropic particle flux because -- owing to the complexity of the structure -- the problem could not be solved analytically. The DIM sen- sor was simulated with its frame mount (see Sect. 3.2.2), whereas the CAD model of Philae (Bernd Chares, priv. communication) was slightly simplified to reduce computa- tional time, e.g. we neglected the lander feet and reduced the shape of the SD2 drill tower to a properly sized cuboid. The DIM PZT segments were divided into 800 identical squares with surface area of 1 mm2 each. On each square, 32,400 particles were generated with an isotropic flux from a half-space, which means a total number of approximately Article number, page 4 of 17 78 million particles simulated per DIM side. For each lin- early propagating particle the simulation checks if the trail is within DIM's FoV or intersected by Philae's structures. The ratio of actual impacting vs. the total number of sim- ulated particles is named the detection ratio. 3.2.4. Calculated geometric factors The detection ratio for each DIM side and the values of the geometric factor calculated for the cases described in Sect. 3.2 are summarized in Table 1. The geometric factors are reduced by 17% for all three sides if only the shield- ing effect of the sensor frame is taken into account (inher- ent shading), whereas if the shielding by the structure and payloads of the lander are also considered the values are re- duced by 56%, 37%, and 33% respectively for sensor sides X, Y, and Z. The detection ratio decreases to the corners and the edges for each segment owing to the shading by the DIM frame. The least shielding occurs for the Z-side of DIM. This side is only slightly shielded by the SD2 drill tower and the DIM mounting frames. The analytical calculations performed in Sect. 3.2.2 also served for verification of the numerical model used in Sect. 3.2.3. 4. Results 4.1. Estimation of the maximum flux during descent Estimations for the upper limit of the flux during descent were performed only for those measurements for which the effective measurement time was higher than 0 s. The re- sults are summarized in Table 2. The sequential number of the measurements in Col. 1 are according to Krüger et al. (2015). Column 9 corresponds only to the number of real detections; false signals are not included. The maximum impact rate (Nmax.) in Col. 10 was defined as the ratio of parameter λ of the Poisson distribution calculated accord- ing to Eqs. (4) and (6) respectively for the non-detection and the single detection of particle impacts to the effective measurement time shown in Col. 6. Finally, Φmax. in Col. 11 was calculated according to Eq. (7). 4.2. Estimation of the maximum flux at Abydos Since no impact signals were detected at all at the final landing site Abydos during the FSS, the measurement times for each sensor side were summed: 5(cid:88) 2(cid:88) Tmeas., i, total = Tmeas., i, j, k, (9) j=1 k=1 where Tmeas., i, j, k is the measurement time for sensor side i in the kth measurement of FSS DIM Block number j. The maximum impact rate for the ith sensor side in the above case is Nimp., i, max. = λmax./Tmeas., i, total , (10) where λmax. is calculated according to Eq. 4. The upper limits of the flux values (Φmax., see Table 3) for particles in the measurement range of the DIM sensor A. Hirn et al.: Estimation of particle flux based on SESAME-DIM measurements were estimated using Eq. 7 and by considering the geomet- ric factors calculated for the lander configuration (see values in Table 1). 4.3. Particle flux and the topography of Abydos The topography at Abydos is a major concern with regard to the potential flux detection, in addition to the activity of the comet and the self shading by the structure of Phi- lae or the sensor itself. The images of the Çiva cameras (Bibring et al. 2015) at Abydos show that the lander is partially surrounded by an obstacle that prevents the sun- light from reaching the solar panels for long periods of time. Right after landing, in November 2014, the panels received sunlight for less than two hours per comet day, which was not enough to charge the lander's batteries. Because under- standing the illumination conditions on the lander would help us to determine the topography at Abydos, Flandes et al. (2016; document in preparation) simulated the pattern of illumination on Philae assuming that the lander is par- tially surrounded by a sinusoid-shaped barrier with a height equivalent to approximately three times the height of the lander (see Fig. 3). A top view of this configuration would set the lander in a trough or peak of this sinusoid. In this simulation the Sun always moves along the horizon for the lander (at low elevations < 22.5◦). Under these conditions, the lander is illuminated for 1.5 hours out of the 12.4 hour rotation period of the comet. The panel that receives the largest amount of light is Panel 1 (which is parallel with the Y side of DIM), followed by Panel 2. Panel 6 (top panel, which is parallel with the Z side of DIM) and Panel 3 receive very little sunlight. If this geometry is accurate, the incoming particle flux for DIM will be very much reduced as well (assuming that neither the barrier nor the floor of Abydos in the immedi- ate vicinity of the spacecraft are dust sources). The tem- perature measured by the Multi-Purpose Sensors for Sur- face and Subsurface Science (MUPUS) experiment at 90 -- 130 K is well below the water sublimation temperature, which implies that the immediate environment was not ac- tive (Spohn et al. 2015). For practical purposes, the lander could be considered to be inside a hypothetical partially opened box where the floor of the site is its bottom and the barrier/wall represents only three of its sides. One conclu- sion is that particles could reach the sensor only through the top of this box or from one of its sides. With this fur- ther simplification, the general field of view of the sensor (if considered at the centre of this box) would be reduced to 1/3 of the total, i.e. 4/3π sr. Given that the Sun never goes far above the horizon in this simulation, the three most im- portant parameters are the separation between the sides, the depth of this box, and the maximum elevation of the Sun. A variation of > 10% in any of these three parameters would produce a similar variation in the illumination pat- tern on the lander. Still, the geometric factor of the sensor segments is already reduced to 33% -- 56% as a result of shad- ing by the lander structure and some other payloads (see Table 1), which means that further corrections are unnec- essary as the uncertainties in other factors are significantly higher. Auster et al. (2015) estimated the local gravity as g = 10−4 m s−2 at the Abydos landing site at a distance of 2332 m from the barycenter of the nucleus. This gives an escape velocity of approximately 0.7 m s−1. If particle speeds v below the escape velocity are considered, the ex- pected speed range for particles in the measurement range of DIM can be constrained to 0.1 m s−1−0.7 m s−1. An up- per boundary for the volume density (nmax. = Φmax.Ωeff./v, where Ωeff. is the effective solid angle) of such particles is then of the order of 10−11 m−3 − 10−12 m−3. 5. Discussion Although DIM was taking measurements starting from the onset of comet activity of 67P/C-G in November 2014 at about 3 AU heliocentric distance, only one single detection of particle impact was made. During descent the relatively short measurement times did not permit the measurement of particles with good statistics. The total measurement time was only 35 minutes, which -- owing to the large num- ber of false signals resulting from the cross-talk from the MPPTs -- was further reduced to less than 20 minutes noise- free time. Hence, instead of the flux, the upper limit of the flux of particles in the measurement range of DIM was de- termined (see Table 2). At the final landing site Abydos, the total measurement time was an order of magnitude higher than for the descent, but -- probably due to the shading from the environment and the low activity of the comet in the vicinity of Philae -- no detection of particle impacts was made. Calculations were also performed with the GIADA Per- formance Simulator (GIPSI) to simulate the expected fluxes on the DIM instrument during the descent of the lander. GIADA is an experiment on the Rosetta orbiter devoted to the measurements of the physical properties of cometary dust grains in orbit around the nucleus. The grain detec- tion system (GDS) of GIADA detects the transit of each single grain entering the instrument by means of a light curtain. In addition an impact sensor (IS) equipped with PZT sensors and five microbalances measuring mass de- position on quartz crystals are included in the experiment (Colangeli et al. 2007). The Java client software GIPSI is able to simulate GIADA performance, in particular GIPSI forecasts how an instrument or a defined surface reacts to a dust environment along a specific trajectory for defined time intervals. Inputs to GIPSI are the dust environments described or evaluated by models (e.g. grain number den- sity, particle size distribution, and velocity). As inputs to GIPSI, in addition to the time-dependent 3D model envi- ronment, we use the spacecraft and comet orbits (the atti- tude and the position of the spacecraft and the speed along the orbit for each time step) and instrument parameters (i.e. field of view, sensitive surface area, subsystems sensi- tivities). GIPSI simulates the instrument-dust interaction for each time step (defined as input of the simulation) and position along the orbit of the spacecraft. The software eval- uates the vector parameters of the dust model outputs into the instrument reference frame considering the rotation of the comet nucleus and the velocity of the spacecraft. The outputs of the simulation are the number of grains impact- ing on the surface of the sensor (Della Corte et al. 2014). In order to simulate the expected fluxes on the DIM instrument during the descent of the lander we used the GIPSI simulation software considering as dust environment the fluxes and the speeds described in Fulle et al. (2010). The dynamical parameters measured by GIADA during the same period confirm that the use of Fulle's model is sub- stantiated (Della Corte et al. 2015; Rotundi et al. 2015). Article number, page 5 of 17 A&A proofs: manuscript no. AA_postprint Fulle's dust-tail model (Fulle 1987, 1989) derives an ejec- tion flux and an ejection velocity for each dust mass (Fulle 1992). The grains are assumed to be spherical. According to the derived dust ejection velocity, the mass able to es- cape the nucleus gravity field at a distance of 20 nucleus radii, assuming a bulk density of 1000 kg m−3, is checked. Owing to the nucleus asphericity and possibly lower bulk density (533 kg m−3 as reported by Pätzold et al. (2016)), the escape velocity is probably significantly lower than the assumed value of 0.5 m s−1 (Fulle et al. 2010). The method also requires the value of grain-specific mass to be postu- lated. The lowest values of the dust mass loss rate is be- −1 at 3 AU, derived by the assumed tween 10 and 40 kg s specific mass and the reported maximum dust mass loss −1 at 3 AU. The model assigns to all grains rate 112 kg s of the same size bin a constant radial velocity equal to the terminal velocity computed in Fulle et al. (2010). In par- ticular, we used the upper values for the fluxes reported in Fulle et al. (2010). We considered an isotropic expansion of the particle flux, and to calculate the number of parti- cles emitted, we considered two different densities for the particles; 100 kg m−3 (fluffy) and 1000 kg m−3 (compact). Fluffy particles emitted from the comet nucleus were de- tected in the size range up to a few hundred micrometres by the Cometary Secondary Ion Mass Analyzer (COSIMA) on board the Rosetta orbiter (Schulz et al. 2015; Langevin et al. 2016). From the GDS-only detections of the GIADA experiment, Fulle et al. (2015) also inferred fluffy particles of equivalent bulk density of less than 1 kg m−3, which they associated with the fluffy particles observed by COSIMA. the the ESAC repository spice (LORL_DL_007_02____P__00220.BSP). Since the GIPSI tool is only able to simulate the fluxes over the Rosetta Orbiter spacecraft, to simulate the fluxes over the DIM surface we modified the kernel by changing the reference object of the trajectory and imposing the lander as reference object. Owing to the lack of a consolidated spice kernel describing the lander attitude during the descent we considered an orientation with the +Z side of the lander parallel to the direction of the force of gravity (nadir direction) at the given position. of Philae we in trajectory reported the kernel used For The DIM sensor is sensitive to compact particles having a minimum radius of 0.25 mm and 0.5 mm if the detection margin is set to 30 dB and 40 dB, respectively. The particles have a power law size distribution, so it is enough to con- sider the size bins of particles with radius of 0.21 mm and 0.45 mm in the first approximation. The results of the sim- ulation for compact particles are shown in Fig. 4. For fluffy particles the corresponding count rates are only 25% higher (for comparison of data see Fig. 5). The orientation of Phi- lae during DIM operational periods was not known at the time of writing, hence GIPSI fluxes calculated in the nadir direction are used only as the upper limit. In the GIPSI tool the configuration of the GDS in GIADA, having a field of view of 67◦ (corresponding to 1 sr) and a collecting sur- face of 100 cm2 are considered. This approximation results in an expected number of counts of maximum 0.005 − 0.5 for compact and for fluffy particles within a total measure- ment time of 20 minutes. This is in good agreement with the non-detection of compact particles during descent. Nev- ertheless, the detection of a fluffy particle with a radius of 1 mm was also an extremely unlikely event. Since the sensor sides of DIM were pointing off-nadir, a GIPSI calculation Article number, page 6 of 17 knowing the orientiation of the lander would have provided even lower values for the number of counts. 6. Conclusions On the 12 November 2014 lander Philae was deployed from the Rosetta Orbiter onto the nucleus of comet 67P/C-G. The DIM experiment of the SESAME instrument package was switched on several times during descent and on the surface of the nucleus to detect impacts from submillimetre- to millimetre-sized particles. Based on measurements performed with DIM, the upper limit of the flux of particles in the measurement range of the instrument was of the order of 10−8 − 10−7m−2s−1sr−1 during descent. The upper limit of the ambient flux of the submillimetre- and millimetre-sized dust and ice particles at Abydos was estimated to be 1.6·10−9m−2s−1sr−1 on 13 and 14 November 2014. A correction factor of 1/3 for the field of view of the sensors was calculated based on an analysis of the pattern of illumination on Philae. Considering particle speeds below escape velocity, the upper limit for the volume density of particles in the measurement range of DIM was constrained to 10−11 m−3 − 10−12 m−3. Results of the calculations performed with the GIPSI tool on the expected particle fluxes during the descent of Philae are compatible with the non-detection of compact particles by the DIM instrument. Acknowledgements. SESAME is an experiment on the Rosetta lan- der Philae. It consists of three instruments CASSE, DIM, and PP, which were provided by a consortium comprising DLR, MPS, FMI, MTA EK, Fraunhofer IZFP, Univ. Cologne, LATMOS, and ES- TEC. The contribution from MTA EK to the SESAME-DIM ex- periment was co-funded through the PRODEX contract No. 90010 and by the Government of Hungary through European Space Agency contracts No. 98001, 98072, 4000106879/12/NL/KML, and 4000107211/12/NL/KML under the plan for European Cooperating States (PECS). This research was supported by the German Bun- desministerium für Bildung und Forschung through Deutsches Zen- trum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR, grant 50 QP 1302). The work published in this paper was performed during a visit of A. Hirn and A. Flandes at MPS. Both guest scientists are grateful to MPS for financial support during the visit. A. Flandes was also supported by DGAPA-PAPIIT IA100114 and IA105016. We thank the Rosetta project at ESA and the Philae project at DLR and CNES for effective and successful mission operations. References Auster, H.-U., Apáthy, I., Berghofer, G., et al. 2015, Science, 349, Bibring, J.-P., Langevin, Y., Carter, J., et al. 2015, Science, 349, 6247 aab0671 Rev., 128, 205 Sci. Rev., 128, 803 put., 5, 57 583, A13 Bibring, J.-P., Rosenbauer, H., Böhnhardt, H., et al. 2007, Space Sci. Biele, J., Ulamec, S., Maibaum, M., et al. 2015, Science, 349, 6247 Colangeli, L., Lopez-Moreno, J. J., Palumbo, P., et al. 2007, Space Della Corte, V., Ivanovski, S., Lucarelli, F., et al. 2014, Astron. Com- Della Corte, V., Rotundi, A., Fulle, M., et al. 2015, Astron. Astrophy., Fischer, H.-H. 2012, SESAME Flight Software FM-3 -- Telecommands and Telemetry Formats, Rosetta technical report RO-LSE-UG- 3404, version 5.5a Fischer, H.-H. 2014, Considerations on DIM Detection Efficiency (Single Impacts) and the Current Situation of DIM Calibration, SESAME document, unpublished Flandes, A., Krüger, H., Loose, A., Albin, T., & Arnold, W. 2014, Planet. Space Sci., 99, 128 A. Hirn et al.: Estimation of particle flux based on SESAME-DIM measurements 122 Flandes, A., Krüger, H., Loose, A., et al. 2013, Planet. Space Sci., 84, Fulle, M. 1987, Astron. Astrophys., 171, 327 Fulle, M. 1989, Astron. Astrophys., 217, 283 Fulle, M. 1992, Astron. Astrophys., 265, 817 Fulle, M., Colangeli, L., Agarwal, J., et al. 2010, Astron. Astrophys., 522, A63 Lett., 802, L12 92, 156 Astrophy., 583, 271, 76 Fulle, M., Della Corte, V., Rotundi, A., et al. 2015, Astrophys. J. Glassmeier, K.-H., Böhnhardt, H., Koschny, D., Kührt, E., & Richter, I. 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 128, 1 Hertz, H. 1882, Journal über die reine und angewandte Mathematik, Johnson, K. L. 2003, Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-34796-3), 351 -- 360 Krüger, H., Seidensticker, K. J., Fischer, H.-H., et al. 2015, Astron. Langevin, Y. and, H. M., Ligier, N., Merouane, S., et al. 2016, Icarus, Pätzold, M., Andert, T., Hahn, M., et al. 2016, Nature, 530, 63 Péter, A. 2002, Performance Report of DIM, Rosetta technical report RO-LSE-TP-3445, Issue 1 Péter, A. & Lucás, V. 2001, DIM Software Description, SESAME document RO-LSE-SP-3440, version 4 Rotundi, A., Sierks, H., Della Corte, V., et al. 2015, Science, 347, Schulz, R., Hilchenbach, M., Langevin, Y., et al. 2015, Nature, 518, Seidensticker, K. J., Möhlmann, D., Apáthy, I., et al. 2007, Space Sci. Spohn, T., Knollenberg, J., Ball, A. J., et al. 2015, Science, 349, aaa3905 216 Rev., 128, 301 aab0464 Thomas, G. R. & Willis, D. M. 1972, J. Phy. E, 5, 260 Article number, page 7 of 17 List of Figures A&A proofs: manuscript no. AA_postprint 1 5 DIM on the top of Philae. The sensor is visible in the corner (Krüger et al. 2015). Credits: ESA/ATG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . medialab. 2 Maximum angles of incidence at which the impacting particles are not shaded by the frame of the sensor. Diagram of the basic geometry used in the simulation explained in Sect. 4.3. The lander Philae is sur- 3 rounded by a barrier curved as a sinusoid. The front (bottom of the image) and the space above the lander are open. The illumination of the Sun mainly comes from the front because the Sun moves on a plane that forms < 22◦ with the floor of this box. The ≈ 90◦ angle indicates the width of the field of view of the lander towards the Sun. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Count rates of compact particles in the size bins with radius 0.21 mm and 0.45 mm as calculated with GIPSI for a collecting surface area of 100 cm2 and a field of view of 67◦ (GDS configuration). . . . . . . . Count rates of compact and fluffy particles in the size bin of particles with radius 0.45 mm as calculated with GIPSI for a collecting surface area of 100 cm2 and a field of view of 67◦ (GDS configuration). . . . . 4 9 10 11 12 13 Article number, page 8 of 17 A. Hirn et al.: Estimation of particle flux based on SESAME-DIM measurements Fig. 1. DIM on the top of Philae. The sensor is visible in the corner (Krüger et al. 2015). Credits: ESA/ATG medialab. Article number, page 9 of 17 XYZSD2DIMSolar Array!Panel 1A&A proofs: manuscript no. AA_postprint Fig. 2. Maximum angles of incidence at which the impacting particles are not shaded by the frame of the sensor. Article number, page 10 of 17 82ºincoming particleYZXd=2.3 mmL=50 mmW=16 mm87ºincoming particleYXZθφA. Hirn et al.: Estimation of particle flux based on SESAME-DIM measurements Fig. 3. Diagram of the basic geometry used in the simulation explained in Sect. 4.3. The lander Philae is surrounded by a barrier curved as a sinusoid. The front (bottom of the image) and the space above the lander are open. The illumination of the Sun mainly comes from the front because the Sun moves on a plane that forms < 22◦ with the floor of this box. The ≈ 90◦ angle indicates the width of the field of view of the lander towards the Sun. Article number, page 11 of 17 Sinusoid-shaped barrier~90°to open sideA&A proofs: manuscript no. AA_postprint Fig. 4. Count rates of compact particles in the size bins with radius 0.21 mm and 0.45 mm as calculated with GIPSI for a collecting surface area of 100 cm2 and a field of view of 67◦ (GDS configuration). Article number, page 12 of 17 00:0004:0008:0012:0016:0020:0024:000123 bin: 4.54(cid:215)10-4 bin: 2.11(cid:215)10-4count rate (particles h-1)time (hh:mm)12-11-2014DIM detection at 14:43:47 UTCA. Hirn et al.: Estimation of particle flux based on SESAME-DIM measurements Fig. 5. Count rates of compact and fluffy particles in the size bin of particles with radius 0.45 mm as calculated with GIPSI for a collecting surface area of 100 cm2 and a field of view of 67◦ (GDS configuration). Article number, page 13 of 17 00:0004:0008:0012:0016:0020:0024:000,00,10,20,30,40,50,60,70,812-11-2014compact; bin: 4.54(cid:215)10-4fluffy; bin: 4.50(cid:215)10-4count rate (particles h-1)time (hh:mm)DIM detection at 14:43:47 UTCA&A proofs: manuscript no. AA_postprint List of Tables 1 2 3 Geometric factors G calculated for the three sensor sides of DIM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Upper limit of the ambient particle flux during descent (12 Nov 2014) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Particle flux calculated for the three sensor sides of DIM after landing at Abydos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 16 17 Article number, page 14 of 17 A. Hirn et al.: Estimation of particle flux based on SESAME-DIM measurements Table 1. Geometric factors G calculated for the three sensor sides of DIM Model for the sensor side 3 stand-alone PZT segments (3G0) 3 PZT segments with frame (3Gf) Lander configuration (relative to 3G0) (detection ratio) X 76.3 63.7 34.0 (-56%) (0.445) Geometric factor (cm2sr) Y 76.3 63.7 47.9 (-37%) (0.628) Z 76.3 63.7 51.0 (-33%) (0.668) Article number, page 15 of 17 Table 2. Upper limit of the ambient particle flux during descent (12 Nov 2014) A&A proofs: manuscript no. AA_postprint Dist. DIM Meas. Eff. meas. Margin Meas. range (mm) (8) side Meas. numb. (1) 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Start time (UTC) (2) 08:38:32 08:42:23 08:46:13 08:50:03 08:53:52 08:57:42 09:59:04 10:02:54 10:06:44 14:40:04 14:42:14 14:44:24 (km) (3) 22.2 22.1 22.0 21.8 21.6 21.4 18.6 18.4 18.3 5.1 5.0 4.9 time (s) (5) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 100 100 100 (4) X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z time (s) (6) 0 0 198 200 200 200 0 198 0 96 98 0 (dB) (7) 40 40 40 50 50 50 40 40 40 40 40 40 0.5 - 6.5 0.5 - 6.5 0.5 - 6.5 0.9 - 6.5 0.9 - 6.5 0.9 - 6.5 0.5 - 6.5 0.5 - 6.5 0.5 - 6.5 0.5 - 6.5 0.5 - 6.5 0.5 - 6.5 Det. events (9) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Nmax. (s−1) (10) -- -- -- -- -- 1.5 · 10−2 1.5 · 10−2 1.5 · 10−2 1.5 · 10−2 1.5 · 10−2 3.1 · 10−2 4.8 · 10−2 Φmax. (m−2s−1sr−1) (11) -- -- -- -- -- 3 · 10−8 4 · 10−8 3 · 10−8 3 · 10−8 3 · 10−8 9 · 10−8 1 · 10−7 Article number, page 16 of 17 A. Hirn et al.: Estimation of particle flux based on SESAME-DIM measurements Table 3. Particle flux calculated for the three sensor sides of DIM after landing at Abydos Sensor side Meas. time +X +Y +Z (s) 5579 5579 5579 Nmax. (s−1) 5.4 · 10−4 5.4 · 10−4 5.4 · 10−4 (m−2s−1sr−1) Φmax. 1.6 · 10−9 1.1 · 10−9 1.1 · 10−9 Notes. The measurement times of the individual measurement blocks during FSS were reported by Krüger et al. (2015). Article number, page 17 of 17
1109.1614	1	1109	2011-09-08T02:37:01	Are there rings around Pluto?	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Considering effects of tidal plus centrifugal stress acting on icy-rocks and the tensile strength thereof, icy-rocks being in the density range (1-2.4) g cm-3 which had come into existence as collisional ejecta (debris) in the vicinity of Pluto at the time when Pluto-Charon system came into being as a result of a giant impact of a Kuiper Belt Object on the primordial Pluto, it is shown, here, that these rocks going around Pluto in its vicinity are under slow disruption generating a stable ring structure consisting of icy-rocks of diameters in the range (20-90) km, together with fine dust and particles disrupted off the rocks, and spread all over the regions in their respective Roche Zones, various Roche radii being in ~1/2 three-body mean motion resonance. Calculations of gravitational spheres of influence of Pluto which turns out to be 4.2 x 106 km for prograde orbits and 8.5 x 106 km for retrograde orbits together with the existence of Kuiper Belt in the vicinity of Pluto assure that there may exist a few rocks (satellites)/dust rings/sheets so far undiscovered moving in prograde orbits around the planet and few others which are distant ones and move around Pluto in the region between 4.2x106 km and 8.5x106 km in retrograde orbits.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	IJFPS, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 6-10, June, 2011 J.J.Rawal Are there rings around Pluto? J. J. Rawal 1 , Bijan Nikouravan 2, 3 1The Indian Planetary Society (IPS) B-201, Lokmanya Tilak Road, Borivali (W), Mumbai – 400092, India Email: [email protected] 2 Department of Physic, Islamic Azad University (IAU) -Varamin - Pishva Branch, Iran 3University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Email: [email protected] (Received May 2011; Published June 2011) ABSTRACT Considering effects of tidal plus centrifugal stress acting on icy-rocks and the tensile strength thereof, icy-rocks being in the density range (1–2.4) g cm-3 which had come into existence as collisional ejecta (debris) in the vicinity of Pluto at the time when Pluto-Charon system came into being as a result of a giant impact of a Kuiper Belt Object on the primordial Pluto, it is shown, here, that these rocks going around Pluto in its vicinity are under slow disruption generating a stable ring structure consisting of icy-rocks of diameters in the range (20–90) km, together with fine dust and particles disrupted off the rocks, and spread all over the regions in their respective Roche Zones, various Roche radii being in ~1/2 three-body mean motion resonance. Calculations of gravitational spheres of influence of Pluto which turns out to be 4.2 x 10 6 km for prograde orbits and 8.5 x 106 km for retrograde orbits together with the existence of Kuiper Belt in the vicinity of Pluto assure that there may exist a few rocks (satellites)/dust rings/sheets so far undiscovered moving in prograde orbits around the planet and few others which are distant ones and move around Pluto in the region between 4.2x106 km and 8.5x106 km in retrograde orbits. Key words: Giant impact-Pluto-Charon System- Roche-limit- resonance- rings- new satellites- Kuiper-Belt. INTRODUCTION Now that Pluto is no longer considered a planet and has been known to have three satellites, namely, Charon (Christy and Harrington, 1978, 1980; Harrington and Harrington, 1980; Harrington and Christy 1980a,b), Nix and Hydra (Weaver et al., 2006), a question has arisen as to whether Pluto has a ring structure and satellites so far undiscovered going around it. That NASA’s robotic space-probe “New Horizons” has been on its way to Pluto, several authors in trying to answer the question, have analyzed the problem and would go on analyzing it untill the space- probe will reach Pluto in the year 2015. Some planetary scientists (Stern 1988, 1995, 2002; Stern et al. 1991, 1994, 1997a, b, 2003, 2006a, b; Steffl and Stern 2007; Steffl et al., 2006; Tholen and Buie 1988, 1990, 1997a, b) have come out with the prediction that Pluto may have a time-variable ring / dust sheets / partial rings around it which 6 are far away from the planet. These rings were/are formed due to collisions of Kuiper Belt Objects with Nix and Hydra. Here, in this paper, we attempt to show that Pluto may have a stable ring structure and a few more satellites (rocks), yet undiscovered going around it. ROCHE LIMIT The concept of Roche limit is well- known in the literature (Jeans 1928, 1960; Jeffery’s, 1947) . For a rigid body of density 𝜌𝑠 revolving around a primary having radius R and density 𝜌 , the Roche limit around the primary with respect to such a secondary is given by 1/3 𝜌 𝜌𝑠 (1) 𝑅 𝑅𝑅𝑜𝑐 ℎ 𝑒 ≈ 1.44 IJFPS, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 6-10, June, 2011 In what follows, we shall use system parameters as given in Table 1. Table 1. Parameters for Pluto–Charon System that are used here. * There is some uncertainty in the values of densities of Pluto and Charon. VARIOUS HYPOTHESES FOR FORMATION OF PLUTO-CHARON SYSTEM After the discovery of Pluto’s satellite Charon, several authors, (Mignard, 1981; Lin, 1981; McKinnon, 1984, 1988, 1989; Mckinnon and Muller 1988; Canup 2005) , in trying to understand the formation of Pluto-Charon system, put forth several hypotheses such as fission and a giant impact origin. According to (Mignard 1981), there are numerous observed and theoretical facts which favour an origin of Charon by fission. Several authors have investigated the possibility for Pluto to be an ejected satellite of Neptune (Lyttleton 1936, 1953, 1961; Hoyle, 1975; Harrington and Van Flandern, 1979; and Dormand and Woolfson, 1980). After a so violent event the new angular speed of Pluto can give birth to a rotational instability which leads to the break-up of the primordial Pluto. If it was so, the radius of Pluto over that of Charon is to be close to 1.9. This result is in keeping with the new philosophy which is currently emerging in the field of planetology. The solar system is definitely more diversified than it was thought. Then, there is no reason to believe in a unique process to originate satellites, and mechanisms as varied as accretion, capture, fission and giant impact origin have likely been efficient throughout the Solar System. Lin (1981) proposed that Pluto-Charon System might have been formed by binary fission of a rapidly rotating body. If, as a result of fission, Charon was formed just inside its own tidal radius, the mass ratio of Charon to Pluto must not exceed 0.25. Otherwise the resultant spin angular momentum of Pluto would cause it to break up again. The mass ratios must be greater than 0.05 in order for Charon to form outside the unstable co - rotation radius and subsequently evolve to the present stable co- rotation radius rather than be driven back to Pluto. The observational value for mass ratios is 0.1, which is consistent with the limit set by his own hypothesis (This was the case in 1981 when the correct mass ratio of Charon to Pluto and other Pluto-Charon System parameters were exactly unknown, even today also some system parameters are not known exactly). Furthermore, it is very close to the critical value for mass ratio in which the initial object has enough angular momentum to become secularly unstable. Lin (1981) felt that further observations on the mass, size, binary separation and the density of Pluto and Charon would provide new insight into the 7 J.J.Rawal process of binary fission and planetary formation (also see Foust et al., 1997). Precise determination of diameter of Pluto and Charon along with the total mass of the system provide a powerful basis for constraining the origin of this enigmatic planetary pair. The work of Mckinnon (1989) focuses on the angular momentum budget of Pluto-Charon, taking as the point of departure from earlier work of Lin (1981). Because of the large angular momentum density of the system, he argued for an impact or collisional origin. He then addressed aspects of the required impact process and compared them with somewhat similar hypotheses for the Moon’s origin. It has been recognized for some time that Pluto-Charon’s J value is high, but it was not known to be very high as it has been found to be now. Lin (1981) and Mignard (1981), therefore, advocated fission of a single original object. McKinnon (1984), Burns (1986) and Peale (1986) suggested a large-body impact. For comparison, the Earth-Moon system has a J of 0.115, and even this has been judged great enough for impact over spinning to be seriously considered [Durisen and Gingard, (1986)]. The logical cause of Pluto-Charon’s large J is a large-body impact. An impact origin is physically plausible as it is for suspected binary asteroids (Weidenschilling et al., 1989, Weidenschilling 2002; see also Mckinnon and Muller, 1988). Canup to (2005) used hydro dynamical simulations demonstrate that the formation of Pluto-Charon by means of a large collision is quite plausible. He also observed that such an impact probably produced an intact Charon, although it is possible that a disc of material orbited Pluto from which Charon later accumulated. These findings suggested that collisions between 1000-kilometer-class objects occurred in the early inner Kuiper Belt. ROLE OF A GIANT IMPACT ORIGIN HYPOTHESIS, ROCHE LIMIT AND A THREE-BODY MEAN MOTION RESONANCE IN THE FORMATION OF A STABLE RING STRUCTURE AROUND PLUTO According to a Giant Impact Origin Hypothesis, Pluto - Charon System came into being as a result of a collision of a big Kuiper Belt Object (1000 km size) with primordial Pluto. If this is so, it is natural to expect collisional ejecta (debris, fragments) spread all around in the Pluto -Charon System and revolve around Pluto-the biggest of all remnants of the catastrophic collisional event. This shows that the region in the Pluto-Charon System may not be clean but would be full of small or big collisional ejecta (debris, fragments in the form of rocks) and also the facts that the two newly discovered satellites Nix and Hydra of Pluto (Weaver et al.2006) are in proximity to Pluto and Charon, they are on near-circular orbits in the same plane as Pluto’s large satellite Charon, along with their apparent locations in or near high order mean motion resonances, all probably result from their being constructed from collisional ejecta that originated from the Pluto-Charon System formation event (Stern et al., (2006a, b). Stern et al., (2006a, b) also argue that dust rings of variable optical lengths IJFPS, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 6-10, June, 2011 J.J.Rawal form sporadically in the Pluto System far away from Pluto due to collisions of Kuiper Belt objects with Nix and Hydra and that rich satellite systems may be found perhaps frequently-around other large Kuiper belt objects. Let us, therefore, consider rocks (satellites) having densities in the range (1–2.4) g cm-3 (Table 2) lying in the neighborhood of Pluto. We now calculate the Roche limits, 𝑅𝑖 , with respect to rocks of densities in the range (1–2.4) g cm-3. These are shown in (Table 2). Taking tensile strength, s, for an ice-rock to be 3×106 dyne cm-2 (Jeffreys, 1947) in the formula, 1/2 19𝑎 3 𝑠 32 𝐺𝑀 𝜌𝑠 𝑟 = (2) Where 𝑟 is the reduced radius of a satellite upto which the satellite has been ruptured; a, the radial distance at which the satellite (rock) is ruptured to its maximum; G, the Universal gravitational constant; M, the mass of Pluto; 𝜌𝑠 , the density of satellite and s, is the tensile strength. We calculate the reduced radius up to which each rock has been ruptured at various Roche radii Ri, rock density 𝜌𝑠𝑖 being in the range (1–2.4) g cm- 3. This is shown in Table 2. Table 2. Location of Stable Ring Structure around Pluto. Table showing Roche radial distances, minimum radii that satellites can retai n at corresponding Ri and when they graze the planet; revolution periods, Ti, corresponding to Ri. All these parameters corresponding to densities, Si, in the range (1―2.4) g cm-3 Densities, si of rocks(secondary) in (g cm-3) Corresponding Roche limit Ri (km) Minimum radius r (km) that a satellite can retain at corresponding Ri Minimum radius r (km) That a satellite can retain when it grazes the planet. Ti [revolution period in days at corresponding Roche radial distance (Ri)] s 8 = 1 s 7 = 1.2 s 6 = 1.4 s 5 = 1.6 s 4 = 1.8 s 3 = 2.0 s 2 = 2.2 s 1 = 2.4 R8 = 2149.5 R7 = 2022.1 R6 = 1920.9 R5 = 1837.2 R4 = 1767.7 R3 = 1706.0 R2 = 1653.5 R1 = 1604.1 r8 = 43.55 r7 = 36.28 r6 = 31.28 r5 = 27.21 r4 = 24.21 r3 = 21.72 r2 = 19.81 r1 = 18.12 r8 = 16 r7 = 14.6 r6 = 13.5 r5 = 12.6 r4 = 11.9 r3 = 11.3 r2 = 11.0 r1 = 10.3 T8 = 0.2369 T7 = 0.2162 T6 = 0.2001 T5 = 0.1872 T4 = 0.1766 T3 = 0.1675 T2 = 0.1598 T1 = 0.1528 From Table 2, it is clear that the reduced radii up to which the rocks have been ruptured are in the range 15 to 45 km with respect to Roche radii, and are in the range 10 to 16 km at the radial distance grazing the planet. All these rocks lie within the radial distance ~2,500 km around Pluto. This, we believe, form a ring around Pluto. As tidal disruption goes on in this region, the region is full of fine dust, particles and small or big pebbles and rocks, forming a stable ring structure around Pluto. 2𝜋 Resonance theory states that if 𝑛1 , 𝑛2 , 𝑛3 , (𝑛𝑖 = , 𝑛1 . > 𝑛2 > 𝑇 𝑛3 ) ,are mean motions of three secondaries in circular orbits, then condition for frequent occurrence of mirror configuration (Dermott 1968 a, b, 1973; Greenberg, 1973; Gold reich, 1965 a, b; Ovenden et al., 1974; Roy and Ovenden, 1955; Rawal 1981, 1989; Goldreich and Soter, 1966; and references given therein) is given by the Equation 𝛼𝑛1 − 𝛼 + 𝛽 𝑛2 + 𝛽𝑛3 = 0 (3) Where α, β are small and mutually prime positive integers. It follows from Equation (3) that in a reference frame rotating with the mean motion of any one of the three secondaries, the ′ of other two are commensurate, and relative mean motions 𝑛𝑖 that in a frame I (that of the innermost secondary), we have ′ 𝑛 2 ′ = 𝑛 3 𝑛 2−𝑛 1 𝑛 3−𝑛 1 = 𝛽 𝛽 +𝛼 (4) In terms of revolution periods, Equation (4) is written as ′ 𝑛 2 ′ = 𝑛 3 𝑇3 𝑇2−𝑇1 𝑇2 𝑇3−𝑇1 = 𝛽 𝛽 +𝛼 (5) 8 In order to know whether a triad of successive secondaries at various Roche radial distances Ri (given in Table 2) is in stable three body mean motion resonance, we calculate revolution periods Ti (shown in Table 2) corresponding to various Ri to find corresponding mean motions. From Equation (6) we find that a triad of successive secondaries at various Ri has relative mean motion ratio ~1/2 throughout, that is, they follow three - body mean motion resonance relation given by 𝑛1 − 2𝑛2 + 𝑛3 = 0 (6) This shows that various rocks (satellites) at or near these resonance orbits are in reasonably stable resonant orbits, and if they existed there, then they still exist there. In other words, rocks and particles along with fine dust which got disrupted off the rocks form a stable ring structure in the vicinity of Pluto which is within the distance ~2500 km from the centre of the planet. GRAVITATIONAL SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OF PLUTO FOR PROGRADE AND RETROGRADE ORBITS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE FOR EXISTENCE OF UNKNOWN SATELLITES IN THE SYSTEM. In order to know the existence of distant unknown satellites in the Pluto- Charon System, we would like to know how far the gravitational influence of Pluto is, that is, how large the gravitational sphere of influence of Pluto is. We, therefore, calculate here, the boundaries to the gravitational sphere of IJFPS, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 6-10, June, 2011 J.J.Rawal influence of Pluto for prograde and retrograde orbits using King- Innanen formula. Innanen (1979) modified the King (1962) formula for putting in the equation for acceleration in a revolving co-ordinate frame with an additional Coriolis term of magnitude , 2Ω𝑣𝑟 where 𝑣𝑟 is the velocity of the secondary relative to the primary. Here in our case, we consider Moon- Pluto-Sun System, and therefore, the primary is the Sun and the secondary is Pluto. The familiar right hand rule immediately shows that the Coriolis term is always directed radially between the secondary (Pluto) and the primary (Sun). It counteracts the primary’s gravity for the direct motion of the moon, but effectively supplements the primary’s gravity for retrograde motion. For the limiting direct and retrograde radii, r d and rr respectively, of a moon around a planet (here Pluto) in the most general case where the planet (here Pluto)’s orbit has eccentricity e and the pericentric distance 𝑅 = 𝑅𝑝 = 𝑎(1 − 𝑒), a, being the mean distance of the planet (Pluto), we have 𝑟𝑟 𝑟 𝑑 Where = 𝑓(𝑒) 2/3 (7) 1 𝑓 (𝑒 ) 2 𝑚 𝑀 1 3 𝑅𝑝 𝑟𝑑 = (8) 5+𝑒+2(4+𝑒 )1/2 3+𝑒 (9) 𝑓 𝑒 = Here, 𝑚, is the mass of the planet (here Pluto), M, is the mass of the Sun. Therefore, calculation for the gravitational sphere of influence of Pluto for prograde orbits turns out to be 4.2 × 106 km and for retrograde orbits, it is 8.5 × 106 km. The distances of Charon, Nix, Hydra are 19300, 48675, 64780 km respectively. These satellites are very much inside the boundary of the gravitational sphere of influence for prograde satellites. The boundary of the gravitational sphere of influence for retrograde satellites is far far away. At the time of a giant impact, collisional ejecta (debris) were likely to be thrown far away. It is, therefore, likely that there may be few prograde satellites (rocks) revolving around Pluto, between Pluto and Charon and beyond Hydra within the distance 4.2 × 106 km, and a few retrograde satellites (rocks) revolving around the planet between the distance 4.2 × 106 km and 8.5 × 106 km. Moreover, in the vicinity of Pluto, there is Kuiper belt. It is likely that some Kuiper belt Objects might have been captured by Pluto making them its satellites and / or REFERENCES Burns, J. A. 1986, in Satellites, eds. J. A. Burns and M. S. Matthews (Tucson: University of Arizona Press) p. 117. Canup, R. M. 2005, Science 307, 546. Christy, J. W., and Harrington R. S. 1978, Astr. J. 83, 1005. Christy, J. W., and Harrington R. S. 1980, Icarus 44, 38. Dermott, S. F. 1968a, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 141, 349. Dermott, S. F. 1968b, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 141, 363. 9 injected into the gravitational sphere of influence of Pluto thereby becoming its satellites. They may be prograde moving if they had entered into the gravitational sphere of influence of Pluto for prograde satellites, that is, within the distance 4.2 × 106 km, and may be retrograde moving if they are outside it, but inside the gravitational sphere of influence of Pluto for retrograde motion, that is, distance between 4.2 × 106 km and 8.5 × 106 km. This analysis shows that Pluto may have a few, yet undiscovered satellites going around it, a few of them even moving in retrograde direction. CONCLUSION Here, it is shown that a stable ring system consisting of small rocks having densities in the range (1–2.4) g cm-3 and diameters in the range (20–90) km along with fine dust and particles disrupted off these rocks, may exist around Pluto within the distance ~2500 km from the centre of the planet. There may also exist a few satellites (rocks) other than already known. If these satellites (rocks) orbit the planet within the distance 4.2 × 106 km, then they are protrude moving, and if they orbit the planet in the region between 4.2 × 106 and 8.5 × 106 km, then they are retrograde moving. These satellites may be collisional ejecta (debris) which came into existence as a result of catastrophic collision event which formed Pluto-Charon System or rocks captured by Pluto from Kuiper belt and made them its own satellites or Kuiper belt Objects injected into Pluto’s gravitational sphere of influence by some gravitational perturbations due to Neptune or Oort’s cometary cloud as a whole becoming its satellites ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are due to Professors K. Sivaprasad and S. Ramadurai (both retired from Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai) for helpful discussions and useful suggestions and Mr. Hemal S. Shah, Mr. D. K. Sahani and Mr. Darshan K. Vishwakarma for their technical assistance. Thanks are also due to anonymous referees for their constructive criticisms and helpful suggestions that have greatly improved the content of this paper. Dermott, S. F. 1973, Nature 244, 18. Durisen, R. H., and Gingard R. A. 1986, in Origin of the Moon, eds. W. K. Hartmann, R. J. Phillips and G. J. Taylor (Houston: Lunar and Planetary Institute), p.487. Dormand, J. R. and Woolfson M. M. 1980, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 193, 171. Foust, Jeffrey A., Elliot, J. L., Olkin, Catherine B., McDonald, Stephen W., Dunham, Edward W., Stone, Remington P. S., McDonald John S., and Stone, Ronald C. 1997, Icarus 126, 362. Goldreich, P. 1965a, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 130, 159. IJFPS, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 6-10, June, 2011 J.J.Rawal Goldreich, P. 1965b, Astr. J. 70, 5. Goldreich, P. & Soter, S. 1966, Icarus 5,375. Greenberg, R. J. 1973, Astr. J. 78, 338. Harrington, R. S. & Van Flandern, T. C. 1979, Icarus 39, 131. Harrington,R. S. and Harrington, B. J. 1980, Sky and Telescope 59, 452. Harrington, R. S. & Christy, J. W. 1980a, Astr. J., 85, 168. Harrington, R. S. & Christy, J. W. 1980b, IAU circ.3515. Hoyle, F. 1975, Astronomy and Cosmology, W. H. Freeman and Co. San Franscisco, pp. 441-451. Innanen, K. A 1979, A. J. 84, 960. Jeans, J. N. 1928, Astronomy and Cosmogony, Cambridge University Press. Jeans, J. 1960, Universe Around Us, 4 th edition, Cambridge University Press. Jeffreys, H. 1947, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 107, 260. King, I. R. 1962, Astr. J. 67, 471. Laplace, P. S. de 1805, Mecanique Celeste, Vol. 4, Courier, Paris, Trans. N. Bowditch rpt. 1966, New York, Chelsea. Lin, D. N. C. 1981, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 197, 1081. Lyttleton, R. A. 1936, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 97, 108. Lyttleton, R. A. 1953, The Stability of Rotating Liquid masses, Cambridge University Press. Lyttleton, R. A. 1961, Man’s View of the Universe, Micheal Joseph, London. McKinnon, W. B. 1984, Nature, 311, 355. McKinnon, W. B. and Muller S. 1988, Nature 335, 240. McKinnon, W. B. 1989, Ap. J., 344, L 41-L 44. Mignard, F. 1981, Astrn. Astrophys. 96, L 1-L 2. Ovenden, M. W. Feagen, T., Grab, O. 1974, Cel. Mech. 8, 455. Peale, S. J. 1986, in satellites, eds. J. A., Burns & M. S. Matthews (Tucson; Univ. Arizon Press), p. 159. Rawal, J. J. 1981, Moon and Planets, 24, 407. Rawal, J. J. 1989, J. Astrophys. Astr. 10, 257. Roy, A. E. and Ovenden, M. W. 1955, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 115, 295. Steffl, A. J., Mutchler, M. J., Weaver H. A., Stern, S. A., Durda, D. D., Terrell, D., Merline W. J., Young, L. A., Young E. F., Buie, M. W., and Spencer J. R. 2006, Astr. J. 132, 614. Steffl, A. J. and Stern, S. A. 2007, Astr. J. 133, 1485. Stern, S. A. 1988, Icarus 73, 269. Stern, S. A. Parker, J. Wm., Fesen, R. A., Barker, E. S. & Trafton, L. M. 1991, Icarus 94, 246. Stern, S. A., Parker, J. W., Duncan, M. J., Snowdall, J. C., Jr., & Levison, H. F. 1994, Icarus, 108, 234. Stern, S. A. 1995, Astr. J. 110,856. Stern, S. A., Buie, M. W., & Trafton, L. M. 1997a, AJ, 113, 827. Stern, S. A., McKinnon, W. B, & Lunine, In Pluto And Charon, eds., S. A. Stern and D. J. Tholen, 605 U. Ariz. Press 1997b. Stern, S. A. 2002, Astr. J. 124, 2300. Stern, S. Alan, Bottke, William F. And Lerison, Harold F. 2003, AJ 125, 902. Stern, S. A., Weaver, H. A., Steffl, A. J., Mutchler, M., Merline, W. J., Buie, M. W., Young E. F., Young, L. A., & Spencer, J. R., 2006a, Nature 439, 946. Stern, S. A., Mutchler, M. J., Weaver, H. A., & Steffl, A. J. 2006b, Arxiv Astrophysics e-prints. Tholen, D. J., and Buie, M. W., 1988, A.J. 96, 1977. Tholen, D. J., and Buie, M. W., 1990, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 22, 1129. Tholen, D. & Buie, M. 1997a, Pluto and Charon, eds. S. A. Stern & D. Tholen (Tucson, U. Az. Press), p.193. Tholen, D. J., and Buie M. W. 1997b, Icarus 125, 245. Weaver, H. A., Stern, S.A., Mutchler, M. J.,Steffl, A. J., Buie M.W., Merline, W. J., Spencer, J. R., Young E. F., & Young, L. A. 2006, Nature, 439,943. Weidenschilling, S. J., Paolicchi, P., and Zappala, V. 1989, in Asteroids II, eds. R. P. Binzel, T., Gehrels, and M. S. Matthews (Tucson: University of Arizona Press). Weidenschilling, S. J. 2002, Icarus, 108, 219. 10
1104.3804	1	1104	2011-04-19T17:10:59	Precision radial velocities with CSHELL	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	Radial velocity identification of extrasolar planets has historically been dominated by optical surveys. Interest in expanding exoplanet searches to M dwarfs and young stars, however, has motivated a push to improve the precision of near infrared radial velocity techniques. We present our methodology for achieving 58 m/s precision in the K band on the M0 dwarf GJ 281 using the CSHELL spectrograph at the 3-meter NASA IRTF. We also demonstrate our ability to recover the known 4 Mjup exoplanet Gl 86 b and discuss the implications for success in detecting planets around 1-3 Myr old T Tauri stars.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Precision radial velocities with CSHELL Christopher J. Crockett 1,2,3, Naved I. Mahmud 3,4, L. Prato 1,3, Christopher M. Johns-Krull 3,4, Daniel T. Jaffe 5, Charles A. Beichman 6,7 Received ; accepted 1Lowell Observatory, 1400 W Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, AZ 86001; [email protected], [email protected] 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, 430 Portola Plaza, Box 951547, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547 3Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the Univer- sity of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NCC 5-538 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program. 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, MS-108, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005; [email protected], [email protected] 5Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, R.L. Moore Hall, Austin, TX 78712; [email protected] 6Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109 7NASA Exoplanet Science Institute (NExScI), California Institute of Technology, 770 S. Wilson Ave, Pasadena, CA 91125 -- 2 -- ABSTRACT Radial velocity identification of extrasolar planets has historically been dom- inated by optical surveys. Interest in expanding exoplanet searches to M dwarfs and young stars, however, has motivated a push to improve the precision of near infrared radial velocity techniques. We present our methodology for achieving 58 m s−1 precision in the K band on the M0 dwarf GJ 281 using the CSHELL spectrograph at the 3-meter NASA IRTF. We also demonstrate our ability to recover the known 4 MJU P exoplanet Gl 86 b and discuss the implications for success in detecting planets around 1 − 3 Myr old T Tauri stars. Subject headings: techniques: radial velocities -- planets and satellites: detection -- 3 -- 1. Introduction Since 1989, astronomers have discovered over 500 extrasolar planets, ∼92% of which were identified using radial velocity (RV) techniques1. improved velocity precision (∼1 m s−1 e.g., Mayor et al. 2003) have led to an abundance of ground-based RV planet discoveries including the lightest known planet around a main Increased time baselines and sequence star (m sin i = 1.7 M⊕, Mayor et al. 2009) and the recent claim of a ∼3 M⊕ planet orbiting within its star's habitable zone (Vogt et al. 2010). Ongoing exoplanet surveys typically focus on slow-rotating FGK dwarfs. The numerous, narrow atomic lines in the photospheres of these stars allow for precise RV determination. The SEDs of these stars also peak in the optical region of the spectrum, facilitating their study with optical detectors, a more mature technology than is available in other wavelength regions, such as near-infrared (NIR). The past few years, however, have seen a surge of interest in applying precision RV techniques in the NIR, in part to explore M dwarfs as potential planet hosts. These late-type stars are faint at optical wavelengths but comparatively bright at 1 − 2 µm. They are also the most numerous stars in our Galaxy; by focusing on FGK dwarfs in most surveys to date the majority of stars have been neglected. Also, for a given orbital period and planet mass, the RV amplitude scales with host mass as M −2/3 ∗ . Therefore, planets should be easier to detect around lower mass M and L dwarfs. Furthermore, including the low mass stars expands the available parameter space to include lower mass planets. The M dwarfs are also interesting targets to the astrobiology community (Tarter et al. 2007). Because of their lower luminosity, the habitable zones (HZ) are significantly closer to the central star than for higher mass stars and the RV amplitudes of HZ planets are correspondingly greater, thereby increasing the possibility of discovering a habitable Earth-mass planet (Vogt et al. 1Data from The Extrasolar Planet Encyclopedia (www.exoplanet.eu) 2010). -- 4 -- M dwarfs may also serve as testing grounds for models of planet formation. In spite of all the planet discoveries in the past twenty years, a unified model of planet formation is still elusive. In the core accretion model (e.g., Pollack et al. 1996), a planetary core is built up through the accretion of ices, dust particles, and eventually planetesimals in the circumstellar disk. Laughlin et al. (2004) present calculations which indicate that giant planet formation around M dwarfs under a core-accretion paradigm is inhibited as a result of lower surface densities in the disk beyond the snowline, where Jupiter-mass worlds are most likely to form. These planets would thus take much longer to accrete than the typical disk lifetime; however, Kornet et al. (2006) challenge this result and argue that the probability of planet formation actually increases with decreasing stellar mass as a result of a more efficient particle redistribution around lower mass stars. Another avenue for giant planet formation is the gravitational instability model (e.g., Boss 1997) wherein instabilities in the circumstellar disk can lead to fragmentation and eventual collapse. Boss (2006) argues that gravitational instabilities can produce Jovian worlds around low-mass stars very rapidly. Current optical RV surveys of M dwarfs support the hypothesis that low-mass stars are less likely to harbor planets than Sun-like stars (e.g., Endl et al. 2006; Johnson et al. 2010). Johnson et al. report that the occurrence rate of giant planets around M dwarfs (m sin i > 0.3 MJU P , a < 2.5 AU) is 3.4+2.2 −0.9% whereas the corresponding fraction for Sun-like stars is 7.6 ± 1.4% (Cumming et al. 2008). However, the sample size of planet-hosting M dwarfs is small and therefore the uncertainties are large. Further exploration of the giant planet population around M dwarfs may therefore offer some insight into which physical processes dominate formation of these worlds. Although the investigation of planets around M stars provides clues to their formation, the key to learning about how planets form is to observe them in the process. Recent -- 5 -- results on core accretion predict planet formation in millions of years (e.g., Alibert et al. 2005; Hubickyj et al. 2005; Dodson-Robinson et al. 2008). Gravitational instability models, however, predict very fast formation times for massive planets in long period orbits: 103 (Mayer et al. 2004) to 105 (Bodenheimer 2006) years. Subsequent inward migration can also occur on short timescales (∼105 years, Papaloizou et al. 2007) that can bring these long period planets into the sensitivity range of RV surveys. Clearly, any data which can help to identify this timescale will help refine, limit, and possibly eliminate some planet formation models. Ongoing campaigns to catalog the planets around main sequence stars can not directly provide this information. By observing late-type, pre-main sequence (PMS) T Tauri stars, one acquires a snapshot of the early stages of planet formation around solar-like stars. Low-mass young stars present challenging targets for traditional RV surveys. Late spectral types, large distances (>100 pc), and extinction from natal dust clouds make these targets faint at optical wavelengths. They also have strong magnetic fields (e.g., Johns-Krull 2007) that generate large, cool star spots. These spots impact RV surveys of young stars by introducing significant jitter which can mimic the RV modulation imposed by a planet (Saar & Donahue 1997; Desort et al. 2007). Recent attempts at detecting substellar companions in young stellar populations (10−100 Myr) have generally been unsuccessful (e.g., Paulson et al. 2004; Paulson & Yelda 2006), likely because of the small sample size and intrinsic RV variability of the targets. The youngest RV planet detected to date is a ∼6 MJU P planet on an 850 day orbit around the 100 Myr old star HD 70573 (Setiawan et al. 2007). Spectral line bisector analysis has historically been used to distinguish spot-induced RV variations from companion-induced ones (e.g., Hatzes et al. 1997). Companion-induced reflex motion does not affect the shape of an absorption line's bisector whereas a spot -- 6 -- distorts the line symmetry. The line bisector span, the difference in bisector values at two different heights of the line profile, is a proxy for the average slope of the line bisector. A correlation between bisector span and RV variations suggests the RV fluctuation is spot-induced; otherwise, it may be caused by a companion. However, there may also be no correlation if the projected rotation velocity (v sin i) of the star is comparable to or less than the velocity resolution of the spectrograph (Desort et al. 2007; Prato et al. 2008). Therefore, bisector analysis is only a first step in identifying potential young planet hosts (e.g., Hu´elamo et al. 2008; Prato et al. 2008). A potentially more reliable method for distinguishing between spots and planets leverages the wavelength dependence of the spot-induced RV modulation amplitude. The reflex motion induced by a planet affects all wavelengths equally. However, the contrast between a photosphere and a cooler star spot decreases at longer wavelengths because of the flux-temperature scaling in the Rayleigh-Jeans limit of blackbody radiation (e.g., Vrba et al. 1986; Carpenter et al. 2001). As a result, the amplitude of any spot-induced RV variability will be smaller at longer wavelengths. By observing in the visible and NIR it may be possible to distinguish between stellar activity and the presence of a companion by comparing the RV amplitudes at the two wavelengths. Reiners et al. (2010) point out that the magnitude of this decrease for spotted stars is dependent on the temperature difference between the photosphere and star spots and may not be significant if this difference is large (i.e. ∼1000 K). Observations of T Tauri stars, however, do show reductions in RV jitter from optical to K band wavelengths by factors of 3 − 5 (Prato et al. 2008), lending support to the plausibility of this approach. Furthermore, the late spectral types of T Tauri stars produce SEDs with peak emission around 1 µm and extinction of these partly embedded sources is lessened at longer wavelengths, thus allowing for increased signal-to-noise, and hence improved RV precision, in the NIR. Reiners et al. (2010) caution that the advantages of NIR RV measurements may not be apparent for stars earlier than ∼M4−5. For early -- 7 -- M stars, they assert that the decreased S/N in the optical bands is outweighed by the number of sharp spectral features available at the shorter wavelengths. Stars later than M5, however, do exhibit increased precision in the NIR both as a result of increased S/N in the J and H bands as well as the appearance of FeH absorption features. Finally, T Tauri stars allow for some relaxation in the desired RV precision. While optical surveys of main sequence stars strive for 1 m s−1 precision or better, T Tauri stars exhibit an intrinsic NIR RV variability of > 100 m s−1 (Prato et al. 2008; Mahmud et al. 2011). Therefore, NIR RV precision of several tens of meters per second is more than adequate for these targets. Thus, along with studies of planets around M and L dwarfs, RV surveys for young planets also drive the development of improved NIR RV precision measurements. Several groups are active in this area (e.g., Mart´ın et al. 2006; Blake et al. 2007; Hu´elamo et al. 2008; Blake et al. 2010) with some reports of NIR velocity precision comparable to that in the optical (Bean et al. 2010; Figueira et al. 2010). While these results are encouraging, these efforts are all focused on large (8 − 10 meter) aperture telescopes. There is therefore a need to develop precision NIR RV techniques for smaller aperture telescopes where more observing time is available to the community at cadences better tailored to RV surveys. In 2004, we began the McDonald Observatory Young Planet Survey to monitor PMS stars in the nearby (∼140 pc, Kenyon et al. 1994) Taurus-Auriga low-mass star forming region for evidence of substellar companions. Our sample of 143 classical and weak-lined T Tauri stars consists of V < 14 stars, most with v sin i < 20 km s−1(Herbig & Bell 1988). For the first four years, all visible light observations were conducted using the Robert G. Tull Coud´e Spectrometer (Tull et al. 1995) on the 2.7-meter Harlan J. Smith Telescope. In 2008, we began to include additional observations from the Sandiford Cassegrain Spectrograph (McCarthy et al. 1993) on the 2.1-meter Otto Struve Telescope. Observations at the Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO) 4-meter Mayall Telescope using the cassegrain echelle -- 8 -- spectrograph were also initiated in late 2008. Promising targets from these observations, based on measured RV variations and the results of bisector analysis, are selected for follow up K band observations at the 3-meter NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) using the high-resolution Cassegrain-mounted echelle spectrograph, CSHELL (Tokunaga et al. 1990; Greene et al. 1993). Given the 1−3 Myr ages of our targets, a positive detection of a young exoplanet will provide a unique datapoint for giant planet formation theory. In this paper, we discuss our methodology for measuring precise NIR RVs with CSHELL. In §2 we discuss our observing strategy and data reduction algorithms. In §3 we present our methodology for using telluric absorption features to measure the RVs of our targets. We present results from observations of an RV standard star and a known exoplanet in §4, and we discuss the limitations and possibilities of our technique in §5. 2. Observation strategy and data reduction Observations were taken at the 3 meter NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) using CSHELL (Tokunaga et al. 1990; Greene et al. 1993). CSHELL is a long-slit echelle spectrograph (1.08 µm − 5.5 µm) that uses a Circular Variable Filter (CVF) to isolate a single order onto a 256×256 InSb detector array. We used the CVF to isolate a 50 A segment of spectrum centered at 2.298 µm. This region contains numerous deep photospheric absorption lines from the CO ν = 2−0 bandhead as well a rich set of predominately CH4 telluric absorption features which we use as a wavelength reference. The 0′′.5 slit yielded a typical FWHM of 2.6 pixels (∼0.5 A, measured from arc lamp spectra) corresponding to a spectral resolving power of R ∼ 46,000. We observed RV standards, a known exoplanet candidate, and several T Tauri planet host candidates in February 2008 (8 nights), November 2008 (6 nights), February 2009 (2 -- 9 -- nights), November 2009 (5 nights), and February 2010 (8 nights). At the beginning of each night, we imaged twenty flat fields, each with a 20 second integration time, using a continuum lamp to illuminate the entire slit. We also imaged the same number of 20-second dark frames. Additionally, we imaged six Ar-Kr-Xe emission lines, changing the CVF while maintaining the grating position, to determine the wavelength reference. All of our target data were obtained using 10′′ nodded pairs to enable subtraction of sky emission, dark current, and detector bias. Integration times for each nod were typically 600 seconds; for fainter targets we took multiple contiguous nod pairs. The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) for all targets varied significantly depending on cloud cover, seeing, guiding errors, etc., with typical values for all targets of ∼50/pixel per nod position. Our data reduction strategy closely follows that described in Johns-Krull et al. (1999) and was implemented entirely in IDL. We first produced a nightly master dark frame by averaging the twenty individual dark exposures and found a median dark current of 0.24 e−/s. We produced a nightly normalized flat field by averaging the flat field exposures, subtracting the master dark frame, and then dividing by the mean of the dark-subtracted master flat. For our target data, we first subtracted the nod pairs to create a difference image. The difference image was subsequently divided by the normalized flat field. We estimated the read noise from the standard deviation of a Gaussian fit to a histogram of the pixel values in the difference image (∼30 e−). We then identified the location of the curved spectral traces in the difference image by fitting a second-order polynomial to the location of maximum and minimum flux along the dispersion direction. To optimally extract the spectrum, we divided each nod pair into four equally spaced bins of 64 columns along the dispersion direction. Within each of these 64 column bins we constructed a 10× oversampled "slit function" (i.e., the distribution of flux in the cross-dispersion direction). First, a rough estimate of the spectrum was created by summing -- 10 -- the pixels in each column of the difference image for each nod position. The limits included in this sum are from the midpoint between the two nod positions on the detector to the edge of the area that is well illuminated by the flat lamp. This is typically 60-70 pixels in each column for each nod position. Next, each pixel in the bin was sorted by its distance from the order center for the column the given pixel falls in. The flux in each pixel was divided by the rough estimate of the spectrum for its appropriate column to normalize all the pixels going into the slit function estimate. The flux in these offset ordered pixels was then median filtered with a 7 point moving box. A flux estimate for each oversampled pixel was then determined by taking the median of all the pixels that fell in a given subpixel. This then formed our oversampled master slit function. The multiple median filters generally remove the effects of cosmic rays and uncorrected bad pixels on the determination of the slit function. We then fit this master slit function to a three Gaussian model: a central Gaussian flanked by two satellite Gaussians. The amplitude, center, and width of each Gaussian were fit as free parameters using the IDL implementation of the AMOEBA non-linear least-squares (NLLS) fitting algorithm (Nelder & Mead 1965). The resulting model was then normalized to unit area. This algorithm produces four model slit functions, one for each bin. However, the actual slit function is a smoothly varying function of column number. Therefore, to smooth out the transitions from bin to bin, we create 256 column slit functions by linearly interpolating between the four bin slit functions. To determine the total flux in each column of the spectrum, we calculated the scale factor that best matches our model slit function to the column data, per the recipe described in Horne (1986). In order to mask out spurious flux levels from cosmic rays, we implemented an iterative sigma-clipping algorithm. This algorithm starts with an estimate of the total noise from the measured read noise in the differenced image plus the Poisson noise from the target. We then subtracted our model fit from the data in each detector column and masked those pixels whose residual was 3-σ greater than the estimated noise. -- 11 -- We iterated through this process 1−2 times until the scale factor converged, thus providing an optimal value of the spectrum in that column that is largely immune to hot pixels, cosmic rays, etc. This algorithm also provides an estimate of the flux uncertainty at each location along the spectrum. 3. Radial velocity determination The telluric absorption features in the K-band provide an absolute wavelength and instrumental profile reference, similar in concept to the iodine gas cell technique used in high-precision optical RV exoplanet surveys (Butler et al. 1996). Using the atmosphere as a "gas cell" lets us superimpose onto our spectra a relatively stable wavelength reference which follows the same optical path as the light from the science target. This helps alleviate uncertainties introduced by variable slit illumination, changing optical path lengths, etc. We determined the radial velocities of our targets using a spectral modeling technique similar to the one presented in Blake et al. (2007), Prato et al. (2008), and Figueira et al. (2010). We modeled the stellar spectrum and the telluric features using two high-resolution template spectra. For the stellar spectrum, we employed NextGen stellar atmosphere models (Hauschildt et al. 1999) tailored to the Tef f , log g, and metallicity of our targets. We used SYNTHMAG (Piskunov 1999) to generate spectra from the NextGen models along with atomic (Kupka et al. 2000) and CO (Goorvitch 1994) line lists. These spectra are sampled at a resolution ∼14 times greater than our observations. We modeled the telluric features using the NOAO telluric absorption spectrum (Livingston & Wallace 1991) which has a resolution ∼4 times higher than that of our observations. In order to match the model to our observations, we fit a velocity shift and a power law scaling factor for each template separately. The power law scaling accounts for differences in line strength between the observed and template spectra (e.g., McCullough et al. 2006). -- 12 -- The stellar spectrum was then interpolated onto the wavelength scale for the telluric spectrum. To match stars with measurable rotation, we fit for the value of v sin i that optimally broadens the stellar template spectrum using a disk-integration routine with a limb-darkening coefficient of 0.2 (based on fitting the model photosphere to a linear limb-darkening law). For the main sequence stars observed for this paper, however, we fixed v sin i to zero since it is not meaningfully detected above the instrumental broadening. Because the normalized telluric spectrum models the relative transmission of the atmosphere, we multiplied the telluric spectrum and broadened stellar spectrum together to create a composite spectrum and convolved the result with a Gaussian instrumental profile (IP) to model the instrument response. We experimented with multi-Gaussian models of the IP (e.g., Valenti et al. 1995; Bean et al. 2007) but found no improvement in the RV precision. We then fit the continuum level with a second-order polynomial. Finally, we binned the 4× oversampled composite model down to the resolution of our CSHELL data. The resultant model has nine free parameters (two velocity shifts, two scaling factors, v sin i, IP FWHM, and three continuum coefficients). To simultaneously determine the best fit to these parameters, we again used the IDL implementation of the AMOEBA NLLS algorithm. Because CSHELL is cassegrain-mounted, instrument flexure results in a wavelength dispersion on the detector that changes with each observation. We determined an initial dispersion solution using the Ar-Kr-Xe lamp lines imaged at the start of each night (§2). The six individual arc lamp spectral images were stacked to create a composite spectrum. The combined arc spectrum was then extracted using the order tracing from that night's highest S/N stellar spectrum. We found an initial dispersion solution by fitting a third order polynomial to the locations of these emission lines. This initial polynomial serves as a starting point to refine the dispersion solution. For each target observation, we take the observed spectrum and the best-fit model and divide both into eight, 6.25 A wide, bins. -- 13 -- This breaks up the observed and model spectra in to eight pieces. We then take each piece of observed spectrum and cross-correlate it with the corresponding piece of model spectrum to measure the pixel shift between the two. The pixel shift as a function of spectrum bin provides a crude estimate of how much the observed dispersion solution differs from the initial solution across the detector. The eight pixel shift values are fit to a second-order polynomial. By interpolating this polynomial across all detector columns, we estimate by how much the wavelength has shifted per pixel relative to the initial dispersion. A new wavelength solution is determined by adding this shift to the initial solution. We then produce a new model fit using the refined wavelength solution. We iterate this algorithm ∼5 times until the wavelength solution converges. Figure 1 illustrates the outcome of this modeling for one observation of our RV standard, GJ 281. Radial velocities for each observation were calculated by taking the difference in the velocity shifts between the best-fit stellar and telluric spectra. These velocities were in turn corrected for barycentric motion determined for the mid-time of each exposure 2. For each observation, we estimated uncertainties introduced by the photon-limited errors of our observations. These uncertainties in turn have two main components: the first is from the information content in the stellar spectrum itself and the second is in the information content in the telluric spectrum which is used as a wavelength calibrator. As described in Butler et al. (1996), the intrinsic RV error of a spectrum is the quadrature sum of these two error contributions. This in turn is a function of the slope of the intensity with respect to wavelength at each pixel and the S/N. For a given S/N, a spectrum with more numerous and sharper absorption features will have more information content than one with 2Barycentric corrections were calculated using helcorr.pro, an IDL routine based on the IRAF task noao.astutils.rvcorrect. -- 14 -- fewer, broader features. We used the best-fit model photosphere to calculate the intensity derivative and the measured flux uncertainty (estimated from the measured read noise plus the target Poisson noise, §2) to determine the S/N for each pixel. The combined errors from each pixel determine the photon-limited uncertainty on the final RV. We derived the errors introduced by the telluric spectrum in exactly the same manner, replacing the photosphere model with the telluric one. The final uncertainty on the velocity was calculated by adding the stellar and telluric errors in quadrature. A final, nightly RV was determined by calculating the average of the individual nod RVs, weighted by the median S/N across each spectrum. The uncertainties were computed by taking the weighted standard deviation of the nod RVs and dividing by the square root of the number of nods. 4. Results 4.1. GJ 281 To determine the precision of our approach, we obtained 28 observations of GJ 281 over the past two years. This is a late-type star (M0, K mag = 5.9, Tef f = 3776 K, Casagrande et al. 2008) known to have a stable RV (r.m.s ∼ 12 m s−1, Endl et al. 2003). We determined the nightly RVs and uncertainties using the approach described in Section 3 (see Figure 2 and Table 1). The median uncertainty from photon statistics is 40 m s−1 per nod with the telluric uncertainty ∼50% greater than the stellar spectrum uncertainty. The standard deviation of the mean within a sequence of contiguous nod pairs (σRV /√N) is typically 37 m s−1. After averaging, the standard deviation of the nightly RVs over the entire 24 month observing window is ∼58 m s−1. Since this is greater than the variability seen in a given night, we need to estimate what additional systematic error -- 15 -- we are introducing between nights. Assuming that the night-to-night systematics add in quadrature with the variability over multiple contiguous nods to give us our overall 58 m s−1 standard deviation, (σ2 nightly), we estimate √582 − 372 = 45 m s−1 as T OT = σ2 nods + σ2 our night-to-night systematic limit. To better understand the systematic errors, we looked for differences in the measured velocities as a function of nod position. Subtracting the A beam velocities from the B beam velocities, we found a mean difference between the beams of 66 m s−1. The standard deviation of these differences was 131 m s−1, while the standard deviation of the mean was 22 m s−1. The standard deviation of the mean of just the A beam velocities was 15 m s−1; for the B beam velocities, this was 17 m s−1. This suggests that there is a statistically significant difference between the velocities at the two nod positions which gets averaged out at some level when combining all observations in a single night. A simple subtraction from the A velocities to remedy this offset is not sufficient, however. In a few nod pairs, the B velocities are higher than the A velocities and differencing makes this offset worse. Because of this, the variability seen in the binned velocities is nearly identical whether or not the mean offset is removed. It is not clear why there is a velocity offset between the beams. While we expect to see different distortions in the two nod positions, the use of telluric features as a common-path calibrator should account for this. One concern with our observing setup is the asymmetric distribution of telluric lines across the spectrum. The long wavelength half of our spectra is much richer in telluric features than the short-wavelength half. It is therefore possible that we are creating false higher order terms as we track the change in the dispersion across the slit. We tested this by recalculating our RV determination for all the GJ 281 observations using only the left half of the spectrum and then using only the right half of the spectrum. Fitting only the left half results in a mean difference between the A and B beams of 33 -- 16 -- m s−1 whereas restricting ourselves to the telluric-rich right half results in a mean difference between the beams of 10−6 m s−1. While this would seem to support the hypothesis that an asymmetric telluric line distribution may be introducing systematic errors, the standard deviation of the mean in each beam for both cases is large enough to make the statistical significance of these results unimportant. Interpretation of the much lower RV scatter in the right half of the spectrum is therefore unclear. It is likely that we simply do not have enough signal to noise to effectively separate out this error from our other sources of uncertainty. Future observations of very bright targets may help identify the sources of our systematic error. We note that the existence of a systematic shift between the two beams combined with our use of the standard deviation of the measured RVs in both nod positions will most likely over estimate the uncertainty in our velocity measurements. 4.2. Gl 86 In addition to RV standards and T Tauri planet host candidates, we also obtained six observations of the known exoplanet host Gl 86 (K mag = 4.1, Tef f = 5350 K, log g = 4.6, Flynn & Morell 1997) in November 2008. Queloz et al. (2000) presented evidence for a hot Jupiter around Gl 86 with m sin i = 4.0 MJU P and P = 15.78 days. Figueira et al. (2010) used Gl 86 as a test case for their precision NIR RV work with the CRIRES spectrograph on the VLT and were able to show that their observations were consistent with the Queloz et al. orbital solution, allowing for errors in time of periastron (T0) determination and drift in the center-of-mass velocity (Vr) as a result of the presence of a long period companion (Eggenberger et al. 2003). We present our nightly RVs for Gl 86 in Table 2 and Figure 3. The median uncertainty from photon statistics is 41 m s−1 with the telluric uncertainty ∼43% greater than the stellar spectrum uncertainty. The standard deviation of the mean within a sequence of contiguous nod pairs is typically 58 m s−1. Figure 3 plots our -- 17 -- binned RVs with those from Figueira et al. and an orbital fit to both datasets. Our error bars are determined by adding the results from our binning algorithm (§3) in quadrature with the 45 m s−1 systematic uncertainty determined from our RV standard (§4.1). When fitting an orbit model to the data, we allowed T0 and Vr to be fit as free parameters, while fixing all other values to those from Queloz et al. (2000). We show good agreement with previously published values exhibiting a ∼46 m s−1 standard deviation in the residuals. All of our RVs differ from the orbital solution by no more than 0.5 sigma; the mean difference is ∼0.24 sigma. Assuming normally distributed errors, we would expect 1 − 2 of these residuals to be greater than one sigma. To explore this further, we assumed that the underlying uncertainties are gaussian and drawn from a distribution with σ = √582 + 452 = 73 m s−1. The variance in the residuals is dominated by the first RV measurement; excluding that point we find a standard deviation in the residuals of 16 m s−1. We used a Monte Carlo analysis to estimate that the probability of having at least five out of six points within 16 m s−1 of the mean, given σ = 73 m s−1, is ∼0.08%. We further explored the false alarm probability (FAP) that the phase coherence from our observations is the result of chance. We performed a Monte Carlo analysis by holding the times fixed and sampling the CSHELL velocities (and corresponding uncertainties) with replacement over 104 iterations. For each iteration, we fit an orbit model as described above and recorded how often the reduced χ2 of the fit was less than that of the fit to the observed velocities. We find that it is highly unlikely that the phase coherence is a result of chance, with a FAP of 0.0003. We are therefore very confident that our RVs are consistent with the known planetary-mass object orbiting Gl 86. The inconsistency between our estimated error bars and the residual scatter is suspicious, however. The scatter in the residuals is more comparable to the estimated photon uncertainty. Our 45 m s−1 systematic uncertainty is measured over a period of two years whereas the RVs for Gl 86 were measured over a single run. If the systematics were "quiet" on this run, then 45 m s−1 may not be the appropriate -- 18 -- value to use. We see some evidence for the appearance of "quiet" times in our data on GJ 281. During the November 2008 run the standard deviation of our nightly (6 nights) GJ 281 data is 39 m s−1, well below the 58 m s−1 of the entire data set. This is the same run on which the Gl 86 data were obtained. We therefore believe that our uncertainties are most likely overestimates. 5. Discussion NIR spectroscopy has only recently begun to play a role in the search for substellar companions. Mart´ın et al. (2006) combined optical and H band observations to look for giant planets around the young brown dwarf LP 944-20; they concluded that the observed optical RV modulations were driven by inhomogeneous surface features (i.e. clouds). Blake et al. (2007) used high resolution K-band spectroscopy to investigate the presence of giant planets around a population of L dwarfs, achieving a precision of 300 m s−1. They find no evidence for companions with M sin i > 2MJ and P < 3 days in their sample of nine targets. Setiawan et al. (2008) reported the detection of a ∼10 MJ planet on a 3.5 day orbit around the 10 Myr old star TW Hydra. However, H band observations presented by Hu´elamo et al. (2008) reveal a strong wavelength dependence in the velocity amplitude, thus casting doubt on the presence of a companion and suggesting that spots are the cause of TW Hydra's RV variations. Prato et al. (2008) observed two potential planet-host candidates in the NIR, selected on the basis of their optical variability. To within their measurement precision, they detect no K band RV modulation, implying that spots are responsible for the apparent optical RV variability. The aforementioned interest in targeting M dwarfs as hosts of habitable planets (§1) has spurred vast improvements in NIR precision, bringing it closer to that of optical surveys. Bean et al. (2010) report achieving a long term precision in the H band of ∼5 m s−1 on late -- 19 -- M dwarfs using CRIRES at the VLT with the aid of an ammonia gas cell. Figueira et al. (2010) report a comparable precision also on CRIRES but using telluric absorption features as a wavelength reference. Based on six years of NIRSPEC data, Blake et al. (2010) report a precision of 50 m s−1 for their sample of K dwarfs and 200 m s−1 for L dwarfs also through the use of telluric lines. In an earlier paper from our survey of young, low-mass stars, Prato et al. (2008) presented evidence that the RV variability of two T Tauri stars, DN Tau and V836 Tau, is the result of star spots. These two targets exhibited an optical RV standard deviation of 438 m s−1 and 742 m s−1, respectively. K band RVs, however, showed a standard deviation of 144 m s−1 for DN Tau and 149 m s−1 for V836 Tau. These values are consistent with the measurement uncertainties of ∼165 m s−1 and ∼290 m s−1, respectively. These stars therefore exhibit no evidence of RV jitter in the K band. The undetected NIR RV variability demonstrates two important points. First, optical RV surveys can not rely on bisector analysis alone to ascertain the mechanism for RV variability. Both DN Tau and V836 Tau showed significant periodic optical variability and neither exhibited a correlation between RV and bisector span. Multiwavelength observations are therefore an essential element for testing the planet hypothesis, especially in young stars. Second, they support the hypothesis that RV jitter from stellar activity should be significantly lower at longer wavelengths. We have demonstrated ∼58 m s−1 precision with CSHELL over two years and the ability to detect a known 4 MJU P planet. If the ∼150 m s−1 variability observed in DN Tau and V836 Tau is typical of T Tauris, our 58 m s−1 precision is well below the intrinsic noise floor of our targets suggesting that our methodology is well-suited to detecting "hot Jupiters" around young stars. However, we caution against extrapolating from two young stars to the NIR behavior of other T Tauri stars. Mahmud et al. (2011) present another target from our Taurus survey that exhibits a ∼430 m s−1 modulation in the K band, which we believe to be caused by spots, suggesting that the NIR RV behavior of T Tauris may vary -- 20 -- significantly from star to star. The authors thank R. White and J. Bailey for productive discussions on data reduction and our anonymous referee for offering many useful suggestions which improved the manuscript. We acknowledge the SIM Young Planets Key Project for research support; funding was also provided by NASA Origins Grants 05-SSO05-86 and 07-SSO07-86. This work made use of the SIMBAD database, the NASA Astrophysics Data System, and the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS), a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and IPAC/Caltech, funded by NASA and the NSF. We recognize the significant cultural role that Mauna Kea plays in the indigenous Hawaiian community and are grateful for the opportunity to observe there. Facilities: IRTF (CSHELL). -- 21 -- REFERENCES Alibert, Y., Mordasini, C., Benz, W., & Winisdoerffer, C. 2005, A&A, 434, 343 Bean, J. L., McArthur, B. E., Benedict, G. F., Harrison, T. E., Bizyaev, D., Nelan, E., & Smith, V. V. 2007, AJ, 134, 749 Bean, J. L., Seifahrt, A., Hartman, H., Nilsson, H., Wiedemann, G., Reiners, A., Dreizler, S., & Henry, T. J. 2010, ApJ, 713, 410 Blake, C. H., Charbonneau, D., & White, R. J. 2010, ApJ, 723, 684 Blake, C. H., Charbonneau, D., White, R. J., Marley, M. S., & Saumon, D. 2007, ApJ, 666, 1198 Bodenheimer, P. 2006, Historical notes on planet formation (Cambridge University Press), 1 Boss, A. P. 1997, Science, 276, 1836 -- . 2006, ApJ, 643, 501 Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Williams, E., McCarthy, C., Dosanjh, P., & Vogt, S. S. 1996, PASP, 108, 500 Carpenter, J. M., Hillenbrand, L. A., & Skrutskie, M. F. 2001, AJ, 121, 3160 Casagrande, L., Flynn, C., & Bessell, M. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 585 Cumming, A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Vogt, S. S., Wright, J. T., & Fischer, D. A. 2008, The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 120, 531 Desort, M., Lagrange, A.-M., Galland, F., Udry, S., & Mayor, M. 2007, A&A, 473, 983 -- 22 -- Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Bodenheimer, P., Laughlin, G., Willacy, K., Turner, N. J., & Beichman, C. A. 2008, ApJ, 688, L99 Eggenberger, A., Udry, S., & Mayor, M. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 294, Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets, ed. D. Deming & S. Seager, 43 -- 46 Endl, M., Cochran, W. D., Kurster, M., Paulson, D. B., Wittenmyer, R. A., MacQueen, P. J., & Tull, R. G. 2006, ApJ, 649, 436 Endl, M., Cochran, W. D., Tull, R. G., & MacQueen, P. J. 2003, AJ, 126, 3099 Figueira, P., et al. 2010, A&A, 511, 55 Flynn, C., & Morell, O. 1997, MNRAS, 286, 617 Goorvitch, D. 1994, ApJSS, 95, 535 Greene, T. P., Tokunaga, A. T., Toomey, D. W., & Carr, J. B. 1993, Proc. SPIE, 1946, 313 Hatzes, A. P., Cochran, W. D., & Johns-Krull, C. M. 1997, ApJ, 478, 374 Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., & Baron, E. 1999, ApJ, 512, 377 Herbig, G. H., & Bell, K. R. 1988, Third Catalog of Emission-Line Stars of the Orion Population (Lick Observatory Bulletin) Horne, K. 1986, PASP, 98, 609 Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2005, Icarus, 179, 415 Hu´elamo, N., et al. 2008, A&A, 489, L9 Johns-Krull, C. M. 2007, ApJ, 664, 975 -- 23 -- Johns-Krull, C. M., Valenti, J. A., & Koresko, C. 1999, ApJ, 516, 900 Johnson, J. A., et al. 2010, The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 122, 149 Kenyon, S. J., Dobrzycka, D., & Hartmann, L. 1994, AJ, 108, 1872 Kornet, K., Wolf, S., & R´ozyczka, M. 2006, A&A, 458, 661 Kupka, F. G., Ryabchikova, T. A., Piskunov, N. E., Stempels, H. C., & Weiss, W. W. 2000, Baltic Astronomy, 9, 590 Laughlin, G., Bodenheimer, P., & Adams, F. C. 2004, ApJ, 612, L73 Livingston, W., & Wallace, L. 1991, An atlas of the solar spectrum in the infrared from 1850 to 9000 cm-1 (1.1 to 5.4 micrometer) (National Solar Observatory) Mahmud, N., Crockett, C., Prato, L., Johns-Krull, C. M., Huerta, M., Hartigan, P., Jaffe, D. T., & Beichman, C. A. 2011, ApJ, submitted Mart´ın, E. L., Guenther, E., Osorio, M. R. Z., Bouy, H., & Wainscoat, R. 2006, ApJ, 644, L75 Mayer, L., Quinn, T., Wadsley, J., & Stadel, J. 2004, ApJ, 609, 1045 Mayor, M., et al. 2003, The Messenger (ISSN0722-6691), 114, 20 -- . 2009, A&A, 507, 487 McCarthy, J. K., Sandiford, B. A., Boyd, D., & Booth, J. 1993, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 105, 881 McCullough, P. R., et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 1228 Nelder, J., & Mead, R. 1965, Computer Journal, 7, 308 -- 24 -- Papaloizou, J. C. B., Nelson, R. P., Kley, W., Masset, F. S., & Artymowicz, P. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 655 Paulson, D. B., Cochran, W. D., & Hatzes, A. P. 2004, AJ, 127, 3579 Paulson, D. B., & Yelda, S. 2006, PASP, 118, 706 Piskunov, N. 1999, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 243, Polarization, ed. K. N. Nagendra & J. O. Stenflo, 515 Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62 Prato, L., Huerta, M., Johns-Krull, C. M., Mahmud, N., Jaffe, D. T., & Hartigan, P. 2008, ApJ, 687, L103 Queloz, D., et al. 2000, A&A, 354, 99 Reiners, A., Bean, J. L., Huber, K. F., Dreizler, S., Seifahrt, A., & Czesla, S. 2010, ApJ, 710, 432 Saar, S. H., & Donahue, R. A. 1997, ApJ, 485, 319 Setiawan, J., Henning, T., Launhardt, R., Muller, A., Weise, P., & Kurster, M. 2008, Nature, 451, 38 Setiawan, J., Weise, P., Henning, T., Launhardt, R., Muller, A., & Rodmann, J. 2007, ApJ, 660, L145 Tarter, J. C., et al. 2007, Astrobiology, 7, 30 Tokunaga, A. T., Toomey, D. W., Carr, J., Hall, D. N. B., & Epps, H. W. 1990, Proc. SPIE, 1235, 131 -- 25 -- Tull, R. G., MacQueen, P. J., Sneden, C., & Lambert, D. L. 1995, PASP, 107, 251 Valenti, J. A., Butler, R. P., & Marcy, G. W. 1995, PASP, 107, 966 Vogt, S. S., Butler, R. P., Rivera, E. J., Haghighipour, N., Henry, G. W., & Williamson, M. H. 2010, arXiv, astro-ph.EP Vrba, F. J., Rydgren, A. E., Chugainov, P. F., Shakovskaia, N. I., & Zak, D. S. 1986, ApJ, 306, 199 This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. -- 26 -- t n a t s n o c + x u l f d e z i l a m r o N 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2.295 2.296 2.297 2.298 Wavelength (microns) (a) (b) (c) (d) 2.299 Fig. 1. -- Illustration of NIR spectrum modeling for our highest S/N observation of GJ 281 (JD 2455252.906): (a) NextGen photosphere model, (b) telluric template, (c) combined model (solid line) with CSHELL observation (dots), (d) residuals. All plots are normalized to the final model and have constants added for visual clarity. -- 27 -- Feb 2008 Nov 2008 Feb 2009 Nov 2009 Feb 2010 ) 1 − s m k ( V R c i r t n e c o i l e H 20.2 20.1 20.0 19.9 19.8 1 3 5 7 271 273 275 277 375 376 Days since Feb 13, 2008 641 643 645 647 649 651 726 728 730 732 734 Fig. 2. -- Binned K band radial velocities of GJ 281 from Feb 2008 − Feb 2010. The error bars are the standard deviation of the mean of all nods obtained on that night (σnods/√N ); they exhibit a median value of ∼37 m s−1. The standard deviation of the binned RVs over the entire observing period is 58 m s−1. -- 28 -- ) 1 − s m k ( V R e v i t l a e R 0.4 0.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.4 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Relative Phase 0.8 1.0 Fig. 3. -- Known exoplanet Gl 86 b. Open blue squares are NIR RVs measured using CRIRES (Figueira et al. 2010). Filled red circles are our binned K band RVs from November 2008. Black line is orbit model fit to the combined datasets. Weighted standard deviation of our residuals is 46 m s−1. The bar in the lower left indicates the median uncertainty from photon statistics. -- 29 -- Table 1. GJ 281 Radial Velocities JD - 2450000 Heliocentric RV (km s−1) σnods/√N (m s−1) 4510.914 4511.910 4512.914 4513.895 4514.910 4515.902 4516.902 4781.137 4783.125 4784.109 4785.082 4786.109 4787.133 4884.906 4885.867 5151.137 5153.160 5156.148 5158.152 5160.145 5235.934 20.096 19.985 19.981 20.089 20.092 20.054 20.129 20.108 20.134 20.161 20.114 20.048 20.138 20.065 20.126 20.185 20.137 20.094 20.054 20.161 19.988 70.8 14.2 67.7 37.4 60.6 5.5 51.6 12.3 30.7 26.0 38.4 71.0 59.0 28.0 29.3 41.8 50.9 6.4 30.7 19.0 42.7 -- 30 -- Table 1 -- Continued JD - 2450000 Heliocentric RV (km s−1) σnods/√N (m s−1) 5236.922 5237.922 5238.926 5239.918 5240.926 5241.906 5242.902 19.996 20.171 20.135 20.053 20.150 20.107 20.066 32.8 26.3 10.8 61.0 63.8 12.8 86.6 -- 31 -- Table 2. Gl 86 Radial Velocities JD - 2450000 Heliocentric RV (km s−1) σnods/√N (m s−1) 4781.902 4782.891 4783.879 4784.883 4785.891 4786.891 56.303 56.087 56.008 55.974 56.054 56.118 199.5 73.0 52.8 52.3 65.4 81.2
1504.01543	1	1504	2015-04-07T10:37:58	A Search for Subkilometer-sized Ordinary Chondrite Like Asteroids in the Main-Belt	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The size-dependent effects of asteroids on surface regolith and collisional lifetimes suggest that small asteroids are younger than large asteroids. In this study, we performed multicolor main-belt asteroid (MBA) survey by Subaru telescope/Suprime-Cam to search for subkilometer-sized ordinary chondrite (Q-type) like MBAs. The total survey area was 1.5 deg^2 near ecliptic plane and close to the opposition. We detected 150 MBAs with 4 bands (B, V , R, I) in this survey. The range of absolute magnitude of detected asteroids was between 13 and 22 magnitude, which is equivalent to the size range of kilometer to sub-kilometer diameter in MBAs. From this observation, 75 of 150 MBAs with color uncertainty less than 0.1 were used in the spectral type analysis, and two possible Q-type aster- oids were detected. This mean that the Q-type to S-type ratio in MBAs is < 0.05. Meanwhile, the Q/S ratio in near Earth asteroids (NEAs) has been estimated to be 0.5 to 2 (Binzel et al., 2004; Dandy et al., 2003). Therefore, Q-type NEAs might be delivered from the main belt region with weathered, S-type surface into near Earth region and then obtain their Q-type, non- weathered surface after undergoing re-surfacing process there. The resur- facing mechanisms could be: 1. dispersal of surface material by tidal effect during planetary encounters (Binzel et al., 2010; Nesvorny et al., 2010), 2. the YORP spin-up induced rotational-fission (Polishook et al., 2014) or surface re-arrangement, or 3. thermal degradation (Delbo et al., 2014).	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	A Search for Subkilometer-sized Ordinary Chondrite Like Asteroids in the Main-Belt H. W. Lina, Fumi Yoshidab, Y. T. Chenc, W. H. Ipa,d, C. K. Changa aInstitute of Astronomy, National Central University, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan bNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, cInstitute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, P. O. Box 23-141, Taipei dSpace Science Institute, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau 106, Taiwan JAPAN Abstract The size-dependent effects of asteroids on surface regolith and collisional lifetimes suggest that small asteroids are younger than large asteroids. In this study, we performed multicolor main-belt asteroid (MBA) survey by Subaru telescope/Suprime-Cam to search for subkilometer-sized ordinary chondrite (Q-type) like MBAs. The total survey area was 1.5 deg2 near ecliptic plane and close to the opposition. We detected 150 MBAs with 4 bands (B, V , R, I) in this survey. The range of absolute magnitude of detected asteroids was between 13 and 22 magnitude, which is equivalent to the size range of kilometer to sub-kilometer diameter in MBAs. From this observation, 75 of 150 MBAs with color uncertainty less than 0.1 were used in the spectral type analysis, and two possible Q-type aster- oids were detected. This mean that the Q-type to S-type ratio in MBAs is < 0.05. Meanwhile, the Q/S ratio in near Earth asteroids (NEAs) has been estimated to be 0.5 to 2 (Binzel et al., 2004; Dandy et al., 2003). Therefore, Q-type NEAs might be delivered from the main belt region with weathered, S-type surface into near Earth region and then obtain their Q-type, non- weathered surface after undergoing re-surfacing process there. The resur- facing mechanisms could be: 1. dispersal of surface material by tidal effect during planetary encounters (Binzel et al., 2010; Nesvorn´y et al., 2010), 2. the YORP spin-up induced rotational-fission (Polishook et al., 2014) or sur- face re-arrangement, or 3. thermal degradation (Delbo et al., 2014). Keywords: Preprint submitted to Icarus September 24, 2018 Asteroids, surfaces, Asteroids, composition, Asteroids, Regoliths 1. Introduction The taxonomic type of asteroid has been studied extensively to under- stand the mineral composition of asteroids. It is mostly based on the as- teroid's colors and spectra in optical wavelength. Numerous types (such as S, C, D, B and V) have been identified (Bowell et al., 1978; Tholen, 1984; Zellner et al., 1985; Bus and Binzel, 2002a,b; DeMeo et al., 2009; DeMeo and Carry, 2013, 2014). Space weathering effects and related color-spectrum correla- tions for the main-belt asteroids (MBAs) and near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) have also been studied (Chapman, 1996; Binzel et al., 2001; Chapman, 2004; Clark et al., 2001; Jedicke et al., 2004; Nesvorn´y et al., 2005; Willman et al., 2008, 2010; Willman and Jedicke, 2011; Thomas et al., 2012). These studies have been primarily based on relatively larger asteroids; only few studies done for kilometer to sub-kilometer asteroids because of the requirement of large telescopes to determine their colors or spectra, have been conducted. Asteroids with sizes below the kilometer range are most likely collisional fragments of large asteroids (Davis et al., 2002; Morbidelli et al., 2009). There- fore, their surfaces should have lower degree of space weathering compared with larger asteroids, which have survived throughout the history of the solar system (Binzel et al., 2001, 2004; Bus and Binzel, 2002b). Some small, sev- eral hundred meter sized NEAs observed in detail while during close approach to the Earth, showed Q-type spectra which are similar to those of the ordi- nary chondrite (OC) with low degree of space weathering (Tholen, 1984). Re- searchers also reported that a spectral transition could occur between S-type and Q-type asteroids (Binzel et al., 1996, 2004; Dandy et al., 2003). These results indicated that S-type asteroids are likely Q-type asteroids, with their surface materials originally characterized by OC-like spectra, but modified by space weathering to the present-day darker and redder spectra. Labo- ratory experiments (Sasaki et al., 2001; Brunetto et al., 2006)) and observa- tions conducted by the NEAR and Hayabusa space missions (Clark et al., 2002; Ishiguro et al., 2007) ) supported this theory. A large number of Q-type asteroids have been detected in the near-Earth region (Binzel et al., 2001; Dandy et al., 2003; Stuart and Binzel, 2004; DeMeo and Carry, 2013), the ratio of Q/S in NEAs is 0.5 to 2. If Q-type NEAs were produced by collisions, we should also detect Q-type MBAs because the collisional rate 2 in main-belt is higher than that in near-Earth region. While, Q-type as- teroids were missing in the main-belt in the earlier studies (Bus and Binzel, 2002a,b; Lazzaro et al., 2004), more recent observations have detected sev- eral Q-type MBAs in the extremely young asteroid family "Datura dynam- ical cluster" (Moth´e-Diniz and Nesvorn´y, 2008) and the older Koronis fam- ily (Rivkin et al., 2011; Thomas et al., 2011). Carvano et al. (2010) classed 3296 of 62576 asteroids as Q-type-like objects in SDSS Moving Object Cata- log (SDSSMOC4). Polishook et al. (2014) also detect two Q-type asteroids, (19289) 1996 HY12 and (54827) 2001 NQ8, in the unbound asteroid pairs. These results show that Q-type taxonomy is not limited to the NEA popula- tion. However, the abundance of Q-type asteroids in the main-belt is still low comparing with that in the near-Earth region. A simple explanation for this low ratio of Q/S in MBAs is that the survey of small MBAs is incomplete, many of Q-type MBAs might be discovered if the observations are able to detect the sub-kilometer-sized MBAs. The collisional formation model of Q-type NEAs (hereafter, "standard model") could be challenged by the rapid process of space weathering effect with solar wind implantation (Hapke, 2001; Vernazza et al., 2009), which timescale could be as short as ∼ 104 to 106 years. Two arguments have been presented. First, kilometer-sized or large asteroids with collisional lifetimes exceeding 108 years (Bottke et al., 1993, 1994) should not display Q-type spectra under long-term space weathering effect. However, the existence of kilometer-sized Q-type NEAs, such as (1862) Apollo (Stuart and Binzel, 2004), contradicts the prediction of the "standard model". Second, the high collisional rate in the main-belt region can produce asteroids with fresh surfaces more efficiently. On the other hand, the time scale of transport processes, such as the Yarkovsky effect and small resonances, that insert collisional fragments into the planet-crossing space also exceeds 106 years (Rabinowitz, 1997; Morbidelli and Vokrouhlick´y, 2003; Migliorini et al., 1998; Bottke et al., 2002; Binzel et al., 2004). Therefore, Q-type NEAs should not be present if they were primarily transferred from the main-belt with a Q- type spectra. This contradicts the observations made in near-Earth space. An alternative scenario involves a possibility that the surfaces of Q-type NEAs have been reset during planetary encounters, from which the surface materials were removed (Nesvorn´y et al., 2005) or re-arranged (Binzel et al., 2010) by tidal effect. This hypothesis has been tested by several theoretical and observational studies. For example, Marchi et al. (2006) determined that the spectral slope of Q-type asteroids is correlated with planet-crossing 3 frequency. Binzel et al. (2010) and Nesvorn´y et al. (2010) suggested that the Q-type NEAs have experienced encounters with the Earth, Venus and then the tidal forces from these terrestrial planets could refresh the asteroidal surfaces. DeMeo et al. (2014) proposed the possibility that this mechanism might also be valid for Mars. As a corollary, the planetary encounter models predicts that Q-type asteroids are rare among MBAs because of the low planetary encounter rate in the main-belt. Nevertheless, the timescale of space weathering on asteroid surface is still in debate. Willman and Jedicke (2011) studied 95 asteroids for which span a size and age range of about 1-20 km and 100-3000 Myr, respectively, and measured a space weathering time of 2 × 109 years. This is much longer than the result of fast space weathering (Hapke, 2001; Vernazza et al., 2009). Polishook et al. (2014) also detected a Q-type asteroid in main-belt with age ∼ 106 years indicating that the space weathering timescale should be no less than ∼ 106 years. The other mechanisms to create Q-type asteroids are correlated with fast rotation and YORP effect: 1. rotational-fission results in the exposure of material from the covered surface of parent asteroid (Polishook et al., 2014), and 2. rotational re-arrangement of asteroid surface material via landslips (Scheeres, 2015; Walsh et al., 2012) and partial removal of weathered re- golith. These two mechanisms are able to uncover non-weathered materials and display the fresh Q-type spectra. Since the rotation of the smaller as- troids are easier to be accelerated by YORP effect, we expect to detect more small size Q-type MBAs if rotational effects are the dominant mechanism of the Q-type asteroid formation. Delbo et al. (2014) reported recently that thermal degradation induced by diurnal temperature variation is able to break up rocks on the asteroid surface rapidly into new regolith layer. They also suggested that asteroids with large diurnal temperature difference (i.e., NEAs) can be cover by fresh regolith characterized by the Q-type spectra. This scenario predicts that more Q-type asteroids should be detected in near Earth space than in main- belt because of the larger diurnal temperature variation of NEAs. Note that the regolith formation by thermal fragmentation does not depend on asteroid size; it may also imply that there is no color-size relation in the NEA population. From the discussion above, the multicolor observation of kilometer to sub- kilometer diameter MBAs becomes critical to understand the space weath- ering on S-complex asteroid surface and the formation of Q-type asteroids. 4 We should detect a comparable or even higher fraction of Q-type asteroids in the main-belt than the near-Earth region, if the space weathering timescale is > 108 years, and the collisional "standard model" dominate the forma- tion of Q-type asteroids. By contrast, if the Q-type asteroid fraction in the main-belt is very low, the Q-type NEAs must form in-situ and other mecha- nism like the planetary encounter models, rotational-fission/re-arrangement or thermal degradation should be responsible of the formation of Q-type NEAs. 2. Observations and Data Reduction To find sub-kilometer asteroids in the main-belt, we used the data taken by Subaru telescope with Suprime-Cam, which is a prime focus camera with a wide field of view (34' x 27') that consists of 10 CCD chips (Miyazaki et al., 2002). The observational dates were August 9 and 10, 2004 (UT). Three fields were surveyed each night for approximately 3.5 hours from the midnight of Hawaii. The seeing size was 0.54-0.70 arcsecond on the first night and 0.77-1.06 arcsecond on the second night. The observational fields were near opposition and close to the ecliptic plane. The center of the coordinates of each observed field is listed in Table 1. The images were obtained using four broadband filters: B, V , R and I. The exposure times were 120 sec for the B-, V - and R-bands and 180 sec for the I-band. The observations followed the color sequence RR-BB-V V -RR- II-RR for each fields. The time interval of the first R-band set and the second R-band set was approximately 80 min. The interval between the second R- band set and the third R-band set was approximately 60 min. We used this three sets of R-band observations to interpolate the R magnitude in the epoch of B, V and I-band observations to avoid possible color uncertainty due to the asteroid rotational effect. Detailed description of photometric calibration can be found in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 in detail. 5 Table 1 Coordinates of the surveyed fields Aug. 09, 2004 Field ID F1-1 F2-1 F3-1 Aug. 10, 2004 RA 21:18:24 21:18:24 21:18:24 DEC λ -15:11:00 317.306 -15:41:00 317.154 -16:11:00 317.003 β 0.488 0.011 -0.465 Field ID RA DEC λ F1-2 F2-2 F3-2 21:22:12 21:22:12 21:22:12 -14:54:00 318.266 -15:24:00 318.112 -15:54:00 317.959 β 0.478 0.002 -0.474 2.1. Detection of Moving Objects To detect moving objects in relatively crowded fields, we first stacked all 12 exposures in each field to obtain deep images. We then used these deep images as the source images to generate the reference stationary catalogs and remove all stationary sources in every exposure. After removing the stationary sources, we used the KDTree-based near- est neighborhood search method to identify the detection pairs in every two consecutive exposures. The pairs detected in the first set of consecutive expo- sures were used to determine the main vectors for predicting the possible lo- cations in the other five exposure pairs. We then searched for the correspond- ing pairs at the predicted locations of the other set of consecutive exposure. Once the entire set of six pairs (i.e., 12 detections in total) was identified, the complete set was passed to the Orbf it code (Bernstein and Khushalani, 2000) to ensure that the orbital solution are reasonable; the semi-major axis was between 2 AU and 5 AU, and the fitting residual was smaller than 0.5". Under these stringent conditions, all moving objects detected are real and complete color measurements were performed for all of them. The asteroid detection list is summarized in Table 2. 6 RA (◦) DEC (◦) Epoch (MJD) a (AU)a i (◦)a HV B Berr V Verr R Rerr I Ierr Ab Ab err Comment a (AU)c e c i (◦)c Table 2. Asteroid list 7 319.48272 -15.40419 53226.529043 319.39225 -15.22197 53226.529043 319.69678 -15.20883 53226.529043 319.46102 -15.20154 53226.529043 319.46236 -15.19466 53226.529043 319.58996 -15.18535 53226.529043 319.57579 -15.16933 53226.529043 319.38260 -15.16018 53226.529043 319.34533 -15.16815 53226.529043 319.63049 -15.14830 53226.529043 319.86432 -15.11508 53226.529043 319.37775 -15.09740 53226.529043 319.82910 -15.09154 53226.529043 319.58372 -15.09950 53226.529043 319.81048 -15.08243 53226.529043 319.72990 -15.05428 53226.529043 319.31365 -15.03409 53226.529043 319.86975 -15.03411 53226.529043 319.32668 -15.01941 53226.529043 319.70512 -14.98392 53226.529043 319.76720 -15.30467 53226.529043 319.88038 -15.29547 53226.529043 319.74818 -15.28862 53226.529043 319.30847 -15.28169 53226.529043 319.86194 -15.28194 53226.529043 319.71990 -15.27244 53226.529043 319.35283 -15.27298 53226.529043 319.83410 -15.23152 53226.529043 319.62572 -15.22084 53226.529043 319.69906 -15.22543 53226.529043 320.70343 -15.12162 53227.533671 320.65551 -15.05483 53227.533671 320.68576 -15.01347 53227.533671 2.84 2.90 3.21 3.09 2.25 2.55 2.84 3.05 2.56 2.92 2.53 2.85 3.46 2.61 2.99 2.91 2.71 2.91 2.92 2.29 3.28 2.41 2.68 3.16 2.97 3.03 2.72 3.01 2.91 3.06 2.54 2.99 2.88 18.103 22.561 0.014 21.690 0.002 21.277 0.011 20.926 0.008 0.088 0.011 2.31 19.612 24.146 0.021 23.320 0.002 22.981 0.017 22.584 0.001 0.004 0.106 4.69 0.03 18.980 23.970 0.025 23.231 0.037 22.980 0.038 22.661 0.001 -0.119 0.053 16.65 19.088 23.911 0.008 23.141 0.003 22.749 0.017 22.246 0.016 0.002 0.034 18.683 21.583 0.030 20.930 0.012 20.607 0.014 20.563 0.027 -0.130 0.024 5.50 19.353 23.149 0.001 22.336 0.026 21.922 0.013 21.560 0.012 0.048 0.048 8.45 9.71 18.900 23.027 0.012 22.493 0.006 21.859 0.012 21.519 0.023 0.006 0.020 0.16 19.211 23.882 0.087 23.200 0.015 23.056 0.032 22.667 0.020 -0.236 0.140 23.00 21.014 25.138 0.016 24.025 0.023 23.339 0.240 22.887 0.050 0.452 0.351 1.07 20.022 24.513 0.255 23.774 0.046 23.602 0.048 23.087 0.125 -0.176 0.245 11.95 15.351 19.177 0.002 18.279 0.003 17.823 0.003 17.423 0.009 0.138 0.003 2.08 19.851 24.105 0.030 23.461 0.012 23.022 0.064 22.618 0.041 -0.054 0.050 0.68 18.449 23.810 0.041 23.106 0.028 22.772 0.037 22.467 0.009 -0.086 0.044 19.12 18.133 22.075 0.010 21.258 0.003 20.762 0.013 20.367 0.004 0.109 0.008 13.25 19.227 23.837 0.042 23.096 0.028 22.738 0.049 22.321 0.026 -0.042 0.040 19.240 23.795 0.052 22.967 0.004 22.727 0.051 22.365 0.019 -0.065 0.104 0.46 19.777 23.905 0.011 23.108 0.006 22.726 0.015 22.375 0.057 0.014 0.045 7.15 4.80 15.174 19.783 0.008 18.904 0.000 18.410 0.003 17.941 0.002 0.151 0.008 17.177 21.680 0.006 20.918 0.002 20.463 0.007 20.018 0.020 0.041 0.006 1.91 5.76 19.579 22.853 0.033 21.928 0.013 21.657 0.003 21.035 0.024 0.025 0.031 10.14 17.388 22.444 0.001 21.760 0.002 21.409 0.008 21.071 0.003 -0.089 0.027 19.033 22.554 0.020 21.687 0.012 21.228 0.008 20.831 0.008 0.118 0.019 2.13 4.36 15.391 19.505 0.001 18.654 0.003 18.189 0.001 17.780 0.020 0.111 0.003 (62523) 2000 SW24 10.69 18.476 23.424 0.028 22.650 0.021 22.377 0.022 21.998 0.011 -0.080 0.041 8.94 19.373 23.631 0.085 23.205 0.163 22.552 0.029 22.227 0.050 -0.057 0.208 14.48 20.092 25.335 0.035 24.039 0.074 23.739 0.039 23.551 0.052 0.308 0.075 20.254 24.188 0.004 23.599 0.053 23.245 0.020 22.988 0.002 -0.153 0.064 4.47 17.812 22.470 0.004 21.713 0.015 21.393 0.016 21.670 0.434 -0.058 0.025 9.89 1.49 13.441 17.950 0.005 17.165 0.011 16.909 0.039 16.808 0.028 -0.084 0.018 19.460 24.116 0.056 23.453 0.063 23.019 0.036 22.602 0.004 -0.045 0.067 0.96 19.229 23.109 0.009 22.184 0.009 21.719 0.019 21.398 0.002 0.163 0.035 0.60 16.549 21.252 0.001 20.414 0.004 19.955 0.004 19.528 0.005 0.097 0.004 1.51 3.55 18.366 22.788 0.006 22.040 0.021 21.655 0.020 21.333 0.004 -0.019 0.016 2.7 0.07 4.28 Table 2 (cont'd) RA (◦) DEC (◦) Epoch (MJD) a (AU)a i (◦)a HV B Berr V Verr R Rerr I Ierr Ab Ab err Comment a (AU)c e c i (◦)c 8 320.59647 -15.00993 53227.533671 320.33657 -14.97422 53227.533671 320.66292 -14.89674 53227.533671 320.44262 -14.85440 53227.533671 320.58374 -14.84279 53227.533671 320.26807 -14.82940 53227.533671 320.54242 -14.80967 53227.533671 320.52186 -14.78980 53227.533671 319.51576 -15.68548 53226.534619 319.85629 -15.67499 53226.534619 319.75825 -15.67583 53226.534619 319.67486 -15.66787 53226.534619 319.67821 -15.66154 53226.534619 319.38817 -15.64510 53226.534619 319.50101 -15.63361 53226.534619 319.70150 -15.63029 53226.534619 319.72054 -15.60861 53226.534619 319.36405 -15.57624 53226.534619 319.30469 -15.51043 53226.534619 319.30965 -15.50791 53226.534619 319.36096 -15.50186 53226.534619 319.54940 -15.87029 53226.534619 319.35954 -15.87175 53226.534619 319.60794 -15.85584 53226.534619 319.84755 -15.86667 53226.534619 319.80565 -15.84336 53226.534619 319.74746 -15.84407 53226.534619 319.49048 -15.83221 53226.534619 319.61032 -15.82195 53226.534619 319.46590 -15.82367 53226.534619 319.70470 -15.80420 53226.534619 319.47202 -15.79704 53226.534619 319.59842 -15.79135 53226.534619 3.03 3.04 3.05 2.64 3.12 2.88 2.94 3.11 2.50 2.57 2.31 2.14 3.23 2.68 2.41 2.19 2.60 2.92 2.93 2.52 2.54 2.43 2.69 2.61 3.00 3.13 2.65 2.84 2.64 3.11 2.43 2.77 2.77 10.02 19.492 24.327 0.030 23.437 0.034 23.172 0.025 22.874 0.016 -0.003 0.047 17.160 22.045 0.004 21.123 0.012 20.678 0.007 20.248 0.002 0.146 0.015 (252718) 2002 CQ194 2.47 19.167 24.113 0.025 23.148 0.110 22.830 0.077 22.386 0.042 0.087 0.092 0.55 19.728 24.209 0.063 22.907 0.191 22.512 0.049 22.306 0.037 0.380 0.220 3.27 16.584 21.393 0.009 20.680 0.009 20.331 0.005 19.975 0.001 -0.069 0.016 0.43 16.242 20.761 0.006 19.912 0.001 19.504 0.005 19.183 0.003 0.069 0.015 Q-type candidate 2.04 19.503 23.711 0.160 23.289 0.049 22.955 0.029 22.512 0.023 -0.285 0.152 9.75 18.405 23.366 0.013 22.495 0.016 21.906 0.078 21.411 0.022 0.213 0.031 2.37 20.173 23.905 0.032 23.036 0.001 22.675 0.011 22.290 0.010 0.050 0.033 9.54 20.294 24.496 0.009 23.330 0.062 23.168 0.013 22.646 0.090 0.119 0.062 6.24 21.302 24.414 0.004 23.709 0.069 23.215 0.022 22.703 0.048 0.028 0.108 0.80 22.288 24.940 0.189 24.237 0.004 23.481 0.063 23.408 0.000 0.212 0.158 1.03 19.251 23.904 0.309 23.531 0.024 23.224 0.036 22.888 0.035 -0.339 0.221 2.79 20.630 24.276 0.162 23.901 0.102 23.324 0.039 23.055 0.008 -0.146 0.141 8.59 14.861 18.618 0.007 17.524 0.012 17.207 0.014 16.954 0.012 0.178 0.013 3.41 16.856 19.749 0.004 18.932 0.003 18.346 0.043 18.092 0.003 0.172 0.005 (204290) 2004 PV21 7.19 17.202 21.007 0.002 20.289 0.006 19.983 0.006 19.638 0.000 -0.095 0.005 3.43 18.437 22.750 0.010 22.180 0.111 21.635 0.008 21.247 0.008 -0.031 0.106 7.74 19.062 23.533 0.026 22.831 0.012 22.508 0.013 22.208 0.022 -0.095 0.063 1.91 3.71 21.024 24.562 0.079 23.941 0.050 23.454 0.096 23.684 0.008 -0.037 0.143 17.38 19.236 22.934 0.044 22.198 0.017 21.540 0.014 21.088 0.000 0.166 0.040 19.608 23.105 0.043 22.312 0.003 21.859 0.025 21.406 0.009 0.062 0.034 6.49 0.02 20.663 24.784 0.009 23.956 0.019 23.692 0.048 23.171 0.112 -0.048 0.022 14.67 20.238 24.104 0.094 23.357 0.063 22.864 0.014 22.486 0.017 0.057 0.101 13.01 18.785 23.621 0.263 22.670 0.008 22.254 0.023 21.901 0.009 0.147 0.187 15.163 20.077 0.000 19.285 0.011 18.832 0.007 18.504 0.002 0.061 0.012 8.43 19.940 23.945 0.002 23.142 0.029 22.692 0.020 22.297 0.038 0.066 0.027 0.94 17.144 21.536 0.010 20.732 0.007 20.299 0.004 19.942 0.002 0.055 0.009 2.87 20.579 24.493 0.038 23.763 0.031 23.312 0.033 22.931 0.013 0.015 0.060 2.77 1.35 17.336 21.778 0.003 21.417 0.001 20.367 0.399 20.501 0.008 0.177 0.009 20.853 24.404 0.020 23.553 0.026 23.061 0.040 22.749 0.013 0.130 0.029 6.59 20.608 24.561 0.061 24.058 0.024 23.762 0.068 23.680 0.044 -0.255 0.061 5.62 3.68 19.621 23.884 0.015 23.078 0.008 22.683 0.032 22.294 0.047 0.030 0.048 3.01 0.08 3.47 2.17 0.1 6.36 RA (◦) DEC (◦) Epoch (MJD) a (AU)a i (◦)a HV B Berr V Verr R Rerr I Ierr Ab Ab err Comment a (AU)c e c i (◦)c Table 2 (cont'd) 9 319.61758 -15.79291 53226.534619 319.45546 -15.78328 53226.534619 319.75107 -15.77375 53226.534619 319.71019 -15.75217 53226.534619 319.39739 -15.74895 53226.534619 319.43563 -15.73506 53226.534619 319.35384 -15.72188 53226.534619 320.42609 -15.57531 53227.539246 320.79772 -15.55019 53227.539246 320.71232 -15.53839 53227.539246 320.82430 -15.53347 53227.539246 320.32744 -15.53627 53227.539246 320.33516 -15.52610 53227.539246 320.67588 -15.49924 53227.539246 320.41969 -15.47944 53227.539246 320.58908 -15.46737 53227.539246 320.28343 -15.45079 53227.539246 320.80845 -15.38456 53227.539246 320.49664 -15.38502 53227.539246 320.63919 -15.37706 53227.539246 320.63703 -15.38200 53227.539246 320.54423 -15.37073 53227.539246 320.32559 -15.33817 53227.539246 320.76977 -15.30567 53227.539246 320.70791 -15.28156 53227.539246 320.45096 -15.27708 53227.539246 320.64892 -15.22799 53227.539246 320.63783 -15.20756 53227.539246 319.35421 -16.19792 53226.540177 319.60419 -16.39941 53226.540177 319.34255 -16.38858 53226.540177 319.62069 -16.37934 53226.540177 319.33731 -16.17518 53226.540177 2.23 2.49 2.71 2.47 2.77 2.64 2.80 2.22 2.72 3.04 2.54 2.28 2.38 3.16 2.37 3.30 2.72 3.00 2.89 3.30 2.57 2.68 3.05 3.02 2.34 2.24 2.45 2.72 3.11 2.42 3.78 2.82 2.84 20.205 22.574 0.211 22.403 0.213 21.716 0.010 21.393 0.017 -0.213 0.232 4.60 17.988 21.554 0.000 20.831 0.004 20.460 0.005 20.094 0.001 -0.047 0.005 4.66 20.252 24.560 0.019 23.586 0.039 23.325 0.037 22.823 0.042 0.053 0.048 3.71 19.898 23.581 0.031 22.691 0.014 22.219 0.011 21.775 0.044 0.143 0.042 1.68 18.324 22.572 0.030 21.779 0.007 21.291 0.007 20.898 0.001 0.086 0.022 6.53 20.248 24.317 0.005 23.435 0.014 23.026 0.017 22.388 0.156 0.093 0.037 1.59 18.519 22.810 0.017 22.026 0.005 21.627 0.028 21.333 0.010 0.017 0.013 5.80 15.012 17.950 0.005 17.171 0.005 16.604 0.007 16.435 0.037 0.132 0.008 3.42 18.238 22.254 0.019 21.593 0.014 21.240 0.014 20.890 0.024 -0.103 0.024 4.30 18.195 22.782 0.007 22.164 0.023 21.677 0.063 21.371 0.003 -0.039 0.029 2.51 19.103 22.670 0.042 22.071 0.034 21.274 0.062 20.832 0.022 0.167 0.085 3.91 17.616 20.842 0.008 19.942 0.017 19.459 0.004 19.066 0.003 0.158 0.014 3.97 3.91 18.111 21.565 0.002 20.702 0.018 20.258 0.005 19.823 0.014 0.104 0.013 10.05 18.341 23.253 0.030 22.519 0.004 22.227 0.004 21.915 0.009 -0.094 0.034 20.047 23.933 0.117 22.608 0.009 22.424 0.060 22.051 0.018 0.247 0.091 7.19 15.615 20.736 0.013 20.020 0.001 19.653 0.023 19.338 0.013 -0.054 0.009 4.38 17.285 21.499 0.001 20.642 0.010 20.278 0.007 19.797 0.055 0.043 0.010 5.32 15.556 20.261 0.008 19.456 0.002 19.141 0.005 18.844 0.005 -0.028 0.006 7.79 2.26 19.593 24.077 0.132 23.271 0.006 22.923 0.216 22.194 0.003 -0.004 0.099 14.74 17.682 23.284 0.057 22.088 0.092 22.118 0.010 21.781 0.005 0.004 0.090 10.28 18.101 22.082 0.130 21.137 0.001 20.780 0.011 20.310 0.012 0.100 0.093 19.424 23.435 0.044 22.698 0.013 22.313 0.014 21.963 0.012 -0.027 0.083 6.37 17.527 22.273 0.004 21.516 0.019 21.192 0.005 20.675 0.000 -0.055 0.014 1.41 0.90 17.848 22.515 0.017 21.767 0.024 21.427 0.007 21.112 0.009 -0.051 0.024 18.318 21.534 0.002 20.805 0.001 20.412 0.006 20.038 0.007 -0.027 0.005 1.87 17.172 20.377 0.005 19.389 0.008 18.891 0.010 18.554 0.021 0.231 0.009 (151733) 2003 BA88 1.83 19.498 23.051 0.010 22.241 0.035 21.872 0.023 21.580 0.041 0.014 0.030 2.77 18.807 22.916 0.029 22.153 0.025 21.774 0.014 21.434 0.021 -0.012 0.037 0.08 18.054 22.743 0.020 22.135 0.010 21.703 0.009 21.590 0.001 -0.084 0.024 0.65 4.00 20.306 23.827 0.051 22.981 0.184 22.668 0.397 22.918 0.070 0.000 0.173 13.11 17.136 23.051 0.021 22.249 0.008 21.799 0.021 21.476 0.024 0.065 0.021 Q-type candidate 9.67 2.81 18.962 23.206 0.054 22.507 0.026 22.084 0.015 21.272 0.299 -0.027 0.047 20.090 24.511 0.038 23.689 0.048 23.318 0.080 23.047 0.076 0.024 0.098 (6919) Tomonaga (2014) AR8 2.26 0.1 5.16 2.4 2.32 0.14 1.72 0.15 2.64 RA (◦) DEC (◦) Epoch (MJD) a (AU)a i (◦)a HV B Berr V Verr R Rerr I Ierr Ab Ab err Comment a (AU)c e c i (◦)c Table 2 (cont'd) 1 0 319.57251 -16.37746 53226.540177 319.86114 -16.36801 53226.540177 319.64018 -16.13018 53226.540177 319.54882 -16.12899 53226.540177 319.32721 -16.11899 53226.540177 319.60643 -16.12420 53226.540177 319.82640 -16.10238 53226.540177 319.51692 -16.09192 53226.540177 319.83680 -16.07527 53226.540177 319.76208 -16.06889 53226.540177 319.72250 -16.06501 53226.540177 319.36741 -16.05471 53226.540177 319.47395 -16.04208 53226.540177 319.85396 -16.35700 53226.540177 319.72944 -16.02779 53226.540177 319.73087 -16.35587 53226.540177 319.76130 -16.02214 53226.540177 319.58537 -16.01515 53226.540177 319.61491 -16.00706 53226.540177 319.43173 -16.00280 53226.540177 319.72263 -16.35138 53226.540177 319.62979 -15.96643 53226.540177 319.51548 -15.97303 53226.540177 319.69070 -15.97569 53226.540177 319.45615 -16.33313 53226.540177 319.69838 -16.32601 53226.540177 319.69109 -16.28867 53226.540177 319.85657 -16.27948 53226.540177 319.85490 -16.26903 53226.540177 319.56316 -16.23162 53226.540177 319.42440 -16.20991 53226.540177 320.79963 -16.11936 53227.544813 320.56040 -16.08520 53227.544813 2.62 2.35 2.98 2.77 2.95 2.59 2.59 3.02 2.35 2.96 2.67 3.06 3.07 2.91 2.52 2.75 2.68 2.65 2.75 3.02 2.98 2.81 2.39 3.02 2.99 2.51 2.63 3.12 2.68 3.22 2.96 2.99 2.04 18.422 22.469 0.004 21.555 0.006 21.091 0.008 20.694 0.008 0.155 0.015 2.94 1.14 20.808 24.117 0.028 23.307 0.025 22.627 0.025 22.147 0.018 0.234 0.047 12.47 18.580 23.257 0.085 22.428 0.008 22.049 0.007 21.657 0.002 0.035 0.061 6.70 19.475 23.585 0.022 22.919 0.019 22.515 0.041 22.737 0.081 -0.064 0.036 15.29 16.878 21.484 0.003 20.680 0.007 20.161 0.011 19.713 0.002 0.115 0.014 18.688 22.621 0.009 21.759 0.003 21.339 0.008 20.964 0.009 0.087 0.014 3.05 20.109 23.909 0.049 23.185 0.051 22.704 0.034 22.295 0.010 0.032 0.064 3.40 7.10 18.453 23.231 0.004 22.387 0.012 21.858 0.017 21.456 0.011 0.150 0.025 2.16 19.252 22.467 0.011 21.753 0.005 21.402 0.014 21.058 0.002 -0.067 0.011 11.26 18.247 22.939 0.010 22.072 0.096 21.766 0.015 21.404 0.007 0.009 0.103 18.203 22.303 0.007 21.451 0.013 21.008 0.007 20.626 0.008 0.096 0.019 7.38 18.246 23.006 0.009 22.250 0.034 21.893 0.009 21.517 0.008 -0.033 0.067 7.98 19.673 24.456 0.005 23.684 0.012 23.343 0.016 22.974 0.008 -0.033 0.055 8.63 1.61 18.683 23.172 0.046 22.411 0.039 22.125 0.032 21.742 0.005 -0.080 0.046 19.079 22.897 0.021 22.000 0.007 21.660 0.026 21.253 0.010 0.055 0.024 6.36 16.955 21.061 0.009 20.376 0.012 19.827 0.005 19.377 0.020 0.052 0.014 1.16 20.524 24.626 0.030 23.783 0.031 23.335 0.025 23.170 0.004 0.093 0.108 1.49 20.121 24.249 0.022 23.332 0.076 22.790 0.057 22.347 0.099 0.212 0.083 1.79 4.22 19.611 23.959 0.006 23.030 0.025 22.592 0.022 22.195 0.011 0.147 0.021 13.083 17.621 0.007 17.015 0.005 16.939 0.030 16.792 0.008 -0.338 0.007 0.46 19.868 24.295 0.106 23.729 0.042 23.196 0.029 22.892 0.087 -0.043 0.107 5.89 17.485 21.699 0.010 21.014 0.007 20.651 0.617 20.661 0.320 -0.079 0.014 2.03 17.151 20.531 0.005 19.769 0.002 19.490 0.010 19.097 0.002 -0.083 0.004 6.87 9.71 14.657 19.295 0.004 18.576 0.005 18.222 0.006 17.868 0.002 -0.061 0.005 12.99 18.454 23.144 0.004 22.319 0.009 21.933 0.025 21.498 0.031 0.036 0.015 20.177 24.522 0.018 23.069 0.406 23.014 0.050 22.693 0.037 0.247 0.303 0.48 20.354 23.898 0.198 23.519 0.050 23.163 0.021 22.787 0.005 -0.300 0.147 6.04 19.148 23.844 0.026 23.243 0.003 22.847 0.027 22.483 0.043 -0.115 0.024 0.50 20.756 24.994 0.056 24.023 0.117 23.626 0.089 23.131 0.099 0.147 0.167 2.55 4.24 15.270 20.221 0.006 19.547 0.020 19.088 0.012 18.382 0.013 -0.019 0.021 20.773 25.443 0.034 24.592 0.056 24.029 0.040 23.412 0.061 0.179 0.079 0.96 18.126 22.710 0.008 21.997 0.018 21.638 0.034 21.361 0.009 -0.062 0.041 1.87 5.53 21.185 23.541 0.010 22.824 0.023 22.194 0.017 21.742 0.022 0.132 0.024 2.2. Flux Calibration The Suprime-Cam image data were calibrated chip by chip in every expo- sure by identifying Pan-STARRS 1 (hereafter PS1) catalogue stars in the ob- served field; the data were calibrated using "uber-calibration" (Magnier et al., 2013). Uber-calibration is an algorithm used to photometrically calibrate wide-field optical imaging surveys, and it was first applied to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey imaging data. It can be used to simultaneously solve for the cal- ibration parameters and relative stellar fluxes through the use of overlapping observations (Padmanabhan et al., 2008). Those uber-calibrated catalogues have a relative precision (compared with the SDSS) of < 10 mmag in gP 1, rP 1, and iP 1, and approximately 10 mmag in zP 1 and yP 1 (Schlafly et al., 2012). Since we used the B, V , R, I filters in our survey, we transferred those PS1 catalogue stars from the PS1 gP 1rP 1iP 1 photometry system to our Johnson-Cousins BV RI system by using the transformation equation and parameters obtained by Tonry et al. (2012). The transformation error was approximately 0.03 in the B-band and 0.01 to 0.02 in the V -, R-, I-bands. 2.3. Trail Fitting Two problems occur when using the traditional photometry methods for asteroid flux measurements: First, the flux would be contaminated by nearby stars if aperture photometry is used to measure the asteroid flux within crowded fields. Second, PSF fitting fails to yield accurate results if the as- teroid image is not point-source-like object under long exposure. Therefore, we applied the trail fitting technique to measure the asteroid flux. The trail function chosen is an axisymmetric Gaussian PSF-convolution trail function given in equation (3) of Veres et al. (2012): g[x′, y′] = b + F L 1 2σ (2π)1/2 exp(cid:20)− y′2 2σ2(cid:21)(cid:26)erf (cid:20) x′ + 1 2 L σ√2 (cid:21) − erf (cid:20)x′ − 1 σ√2 (cid:21)(cid:27) , 2L where and erf [z] = 2 π Z z 0 exp(cid:2)t2(cid:3)dt x′ = (x − xc) cos θ + (y − yc) sin θ, y′ = −(x − xc) sin θ + (y − yc) cos θ, 11 (1) (2) (3) (4) RA (◦) DEC (◦) Epoch (MJD) a (AU)a i (◦)a HV B Berr V Verr R Rerr I Ierr Ab Ab err Comment a (AU)c e c i (◦)c Table 2 (cont'd) 320.64800 -16.03000 53227.544813 320.27458 -16.02996 53227.544813 320.40652 -16.01986 53227.544813 320.31635 -16.00107 53227.544813 320.82385 -15.98608 53227.544813 320.71048 -15.93982 53227.544813 320.65166 -15.91541 53227.544813 320.62216 -15.91270 53227.544813 320.39658 -15.87950 53227.544813 320.41451 -15.86789 53227.544813 320.39999 -15.85829 53227.544813 320.70450 -15.85786 53227.544813 320.66966 -15.78510 53227.544813 320.65956 -15.74312 53227.544813 320.51081 -15.74918 53227.544813 320.65568 -15.73321 53227.544813 320.32995 -15.71095 53227.544813 320.30033 -15.68513 53227.544813 2.87 3.05 2.29 2.25 2.44 2.64 2.33 3.13 2.56 2.72 3.10 2.64 3.22 2.91 2.69 2.51 3.08 3.15 17.42 17.010 21.444 0.009 20.651 0.006 20.265 0.005 19.901 0.006 0.014 0.009 7.99 17.404 22.289 0.046 21.376 0.014 20.940 0.011 20.564 0.024 0.134 0.035 12.74 20.260 23.424 0.047 22.600 0.020 22.209 0.028 21.855 0.002 0.039 0.047 19.489 22.591 0.019 21.726 0.000 21.300 0.008 20.938 0.004 0.093 0.026 0.53 18.920 22.623 0.021 21.652 0.010 21.032 0.009 20.621 0.007 0.305 0.021 3.24 19.094 23.258 0.031 22.283 0.004 21.818 0.010 21.453 0.019 0.198 0.028 4.53 20.093 23.306 0.004 22.550 0.007 22.065 0.029 21.109 0.511 0.057 0.006 7.10 16.622 21.451 0.007 20.738 0.007 20.321 0.004 19.957 0.001 -0.021 0.008 3.21 2.40 19.464 23.241 0.008 22.462 0.062 22.075 0.010 21.649 0.004 0.004 0.062 18.944 22.866 0.126 22.304 0.055 21.900 0.047 21.499 0.038 -0.137 0.119 3.93 18.993 23.920 0.041 23.057 0.044 22.648 0.020 22.590 0.149 0.079 0.048 0.75 19.097 23.084 0.035 22.283 0.010 21.895 0.013 21.556 0.000 0.021 0.040 1.98 1.12 15.826 20.814 0.018 20.095 0.006 19.707 0.004 19.393 0.004 -0.037 0.014 24.42 17.230 21.705 0.018 20.951 0.000 20.661 0.006 20.222 0.001 -0.082 0.015 19.273 23.438 0.014 22.559 0.000 22.276 0.032 21.796 0.000 0.002 0.018 6.83 3.04 19.194 23.230 0.011 22.099 0.010 21.434 0.127 21.270 0.001 0.450 0.027 12.77 18.356 23.137 0.015 22.386 0.037 22.007 0.007 21.630 0.004 -0.021 0.032 10.08 18.531 23.528 0.019 22.691 0.000 22.247 0.010 21.592 0.191 0.086 0.030 1 2 Note. -- a Estimated by using Equation 6, 7,8 and 9 under assuming e=0. Note. -- b See Equation 13. Note. -- c Orbital elements of known asteroids are provided by JPL Small-Body Database. where b is the background level, L is the length of the trail, F is the total integrated flux in the trail, σ is the standard deviation of the PSF Gaussian, xc and yc are the coordinates of the centroid of the trial. θ is the angle between the long axis of the trail and the x axis. We used the Levenberg-Marquardt least-squares fitting technique to min- imize the variance between the image and trail function. Figure 1 shows an example of an asteroid trail and its fitting residue. Clearly, the asteroid trail can be completely subtracted by using the trail function. The photometric error of the asteroid flux was estimated from the flux difference between two consecutive exposures of the asteroid; we considered the flux difference to be closer to the actual uncertainty compared with the estimation derived from the fitting result. We expect that the SNR of trail fitting photometry decreases with (2.35σ/(2.35σ + L))0.5. Thus the faster mover have larger photometry uncertainty. Fortunately, there is no systematic effect related to the trail length (See Veres et al. (2012) for more detail), and the photometry results should be independent with the semi-major axis of asteroids. 2.4. Detection Efficiency and De-biasing For testing the detection efficiency of moving objects in the observations, we planted 500 non-trailing artificial stars with a brightness between 22.5 to 25.5 magnitude in each CCD chip. The artificial objects were generated by IRAF task DAOP HOT by modeling the stars in each CCD chip in each exposure. The limiting magnitude also depends on the trailing rate of asteroids. Assuming that the moving rate of asteroids is about 0.01"/s in average. We expect that the trail length is around 1.2" in the 120s exposure. For the average 0.7" seeing size of our data, the SNR of the asteroid trail is roughly 60% of the non-trailing source with the same brightness. Therefore, we increased the detection threshold of artificial non-trailing stars to 5 sigma to simulate the limiting magnitude of 3 sigma asteroid detections. We counted the number of detected artificial objects with a function of magnitude and plotted a diagram of magnitude vs. fractional detection as shown in Figure 2, and fitted a detection efficiency function, which was a function with double hyperbolic tangents (Petit et al., 2006), to the test result: η(R) = A 4 [1 − tanh( R − Rc ∆1 )][1 − tanh( R − Rc ∆2 )] (5) 13 0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 Figure 1 An example of an asteroid trail in our sample before (top) and after (bottom) subtracting its fitting result (contour). 14 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 n o i t c e t e d l a n o i t c a r F 0.0 22.5 23.0 23.5 24.0 R-mag 24.5 25.0 25.5 Figure 2 An example of fractional detection as a function of the R-magnitude. The best-fit detection efficiency function is illustrated. Here, the fitted parameters A, Rc, ∆1 and ∆2 are the filling factor (or max- imal efficiency), roll-over magnitude (50% of the maximal efficiency), and widths of the two components, respectively. An exemplary result for the R-band, Chip2, took on August 10, 2004 was the 50% detectability of ap- proximately 23.7 magnitude, and the filling factor was approximately 83% (see Figure 2). Using this detection efficiency function, we assigned a weight for each asteroid detection; the weight was the multiplicative inverse of the product of the detection efficiency of every chip and exposure of the asteroid that passed. The weight of the object with the highest detectability is 1, and fainter objects, which have a low detection probability, have a higher weighting value. Therefore, we eliminated the observational bias in the detection of objects and tested the completeness of the survey. 3. Results 3.1. Absolute Magnitude and Completeness We extracted a total of 150 asteroids with 12 detections from the six fields and measured their apparent velocities. Assuming that their orbital 15 eccentricities were zero and they located around opposition during the obser- vations, we estimated the semi-major axes and inclinations by using the fol- lowing equations (Bowell and Lumme, 1979; Nakamura and Yoshida, 2002; Yoshida and Nakamura, 2007): 1 2γ a = tan I = (γ − 2kλ ±p κ ), β λ + k/(a − 1) , γ = λ2 + β2, κ = γ2 − 4kλγ − 4k2β2, (6) (7) (8) (9) where λ and β are the moving rate along the ecliptic longitude and latitude, respectively; a and I are the semi-major axis and inclinations, respectively; and k is the Gaussian gravitational constant. The semi-major axis and in- clinations estimated using the aforementioned equations included errors of approximately 0.1 AU and 5◦ because the actual eccentricities of the aster- oids were not zero. We compared the orbital elements of known asteroids in Table 2 with our estimated elements. The result shows that the estimate elements are generally accurate; the difference between known and estimated semi-major axes, inclinations are less than 0.1 AU, 2◦, respectively. The absolute magnitude (HV ) of each asteroid at opposition can be esti- mated using the following equation: HV = m − 5log(∆r) (10) where m is the apparent magnitude of the asteroid and ∆ and r are geocentric distance and heliocentric distance, respectively. For simplicity, r = a and ∆ = a − 1 because of the e = 0 and nearly opposition assumptions. Figure 3 shows the absolute magnitude (HV ) distribution of our samples. The black spikes are the raw HV distribution, and the gray boxes shows the weighted result. Based on the results of Yoshida and Nakamura (2007), we plotted two power laws (N (< HV ) ∝ 10αHV ) to the HV distribution, with power law indices b of 1.29 (for the HV range from 17.8 to 20.2 mag) and 1.75 (14.6 to 17.4 mag). Here b = 5 α. This plot clearly indicates that our samples have power law indices consist with the results of Yoshida and Nakamura (2007) and satisfactory completeness of up to HV = 20, which corresponds to asteroids with diameters smaller than 590 meter for the C-complex asteroids 16 weighted unweighted Figure 3 Weighted (Grey) and unweighted (black) cumulative absolute mag- nitude (HV ) distributions of the asteroids sample. Solid and dashed lines show the power laws distribution with power law indices of 1.29 (for the HV range 17.8 to 20.2 mag) and 1.75 (14.6 to 17.4 mag), respectively. (assuming an albedo of 0.05) and smaller than 270 meter for the S-complex asteroids (assuming an albedo of 0.25). 3.2. Colors and Estimated Taxonomic Types From our sample (150 asteroids), 75 asteroids with the HV range from 16 to 20 magnitude, the color errors smaller than 0.1, 0.2 < V − R < 0.6 and 0.6 < B − V < 1 was selected. These asteroids have satisfactory HV com- pleteness and photometric accuracy which made them suitable for taxonomic estimations. The color errors are propagated from the uncertainly of BVRI photometry of asteroids in Table 2. Figure 4 shows the relative reflectances in our asteroid samples overlap with the transmission curve of the Suprime- Cam filter system. The C-complex asteroids generally have a flat reflectance across the four filters, and the S-complex and V/Q/R-type asteroids exhibit similar slopes in the B, V, R region but different reflectances near the I-band; the V/Q/R-type asteroids demonstrated a stronger absorption feature at ∼ 1 µm. Therefore, while B − V and V − R color are used to separate S- complex and C-complex asteroids, the R − I color is needed to distinguish S-type asteroids from V/Q/R-type-like asteroids in the following sense. The 17 e c n a t c e l f e R 1.2 1.1 1 .9 .8 .7 .6 B V Rc Ic 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Wavelenght (µm) Q-type S-type C-type 0.8 Figure 4 Spectrophotometry of three types of asteroid spectra: S-complex, C-complex and V/Q/R-type-like asteroids. The background shows the trans- mission curves of the Suprime-Cam filter system. S-type asteroids are those with R − I > (R − I)⊙ (0.332 ± 0.008, according to Holmberg et al. (2006)); otherwise the V/Q/R-type-like asteroids. We also separated our sample into large and small asteroids by HV = 18.5, which approximately corresponds to a diameter of 1 km for C-complex asteroids. Figure 5 shows B−V vs. V −R color-color diagram for part of our large asteroid sample (Hv < 18.5). The bimodular distribution corresponds to the color difference between the C-complex and S-complex asteroids. Moreover, we identified principal components (the uncorrelated variables) for the large asteroid sample in B − V and V − R space by prcincipal compo- nent analysis to separate S-complex asteroids and C-complex asteroids and resulted two linear combinations of B − V and V − R colors: P C1 ≡ 0.7071(B − V ) + 0.7071(V − R), (11) and P C2 ≡ 0.7071(B − V ) − 0.7071(V − R) (12) The result shows that B − V and V − R axes become PC1 and PC2, respec- tively, after rotating 45◦ counterclockwise. Furthermore, there is a dip at PC1 = 0.82 in the histogram of PC1 and can be the boundary of C and S-complex asteroids. Therefore, we define a 18 Hv<18.5 A 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 R V - 0.2 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 0.8 B-V Figure 5 The B − V and V − R color-color diagram for our large asteroid sample (HV < 18.5). The solid line shows the direction of new axis (A) of the color-color distribution. new axis 'A': A ≡ 0.7071(B − V ) + 0.7071(V − R) − 0.82 (13) Asteroids with A > 0 should belong to S-complex, otherwise are C-complex. The new axis 'A' is shown as a solid line in Figure 5. Figure 6 shows the color-color diagram of axis A vs. R − I. Each dot represents an asteroid. A value of 0.332, which is corresponding to the solar color, was subtracted from the R−I axis to separate S-complex and V/Q/R- type. Two major points can be made based on Figure 6: (1) only two objects can be certified as Q-type MBA candidates; (2) the small sample (HV > 18.5) appeared to be more concentrated at A ≈ 0, though the C- and S-complexes are clearly separated in large sample (Hv < 18.5). 3.3. Fraction of Each Estimated Taxonomic Type To estimate the taxonomic type of asteroids, we considered A < 0 as C-complex asteroids, A > 0 and R − I − 0.332 > 0 as S-complex and A > 0 and R − I − 0.332 < 0 as V/Q/R like asteroids. Four objects locate around D/T type region were removed by visually selection. Figure 7 shows the semi-major axis vs inclination distribution of the 75 asteroids with estimated 19 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 -0.05 -0.1 -0.15 X X X G G C C F F B B Hv < 18.5 S S R R D D T T Q Q V V -0.2 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 A D Hv>18.5 X S C C B Q V R 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 -0.05 -0.1 -0.15 2 3 3 . 0 - I - R 2 3 3 . 0 - I - R -0.2 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 A Figure 6 The R − I vs. A color-color diagrams of the large (upper) and small (bottom) asteroid samples in the present Subaru data. The regions corresponding to three types of asteroids are shown in the plots. The average colors of B, C, D, F, G, S, T, V, Q, R and X-type asteroids from Dandy et al. (2003) are also marked. 20 ) e e r g e d ( n o i t a n i l c n i 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2 S-complex C-complex V/Q/R T/D 2.5 3 3.5 4 semi-major axis (AU) Figure 7 Semi-major axis (a) vs inclination (i) distribution of the 75 asteroids with estimated taxonomic type. Gray dots show the a, i distribution of of known asteroids. taxonomic type. The distribution looks normal; there are more C-complex than S-complex asteroids in outer main-belt. There is a possible V/Q/R- type candidate located on 3.8 AU. It could because of wrong estimation in semi-major axis. To calculate the fraction of each estimated taxonomic type, we took the uncertainly of boundaries of A and R − I axes, which are 0.02 from the bin- size of A histogram and 0.008 from the uncertainty of (R− I)⊙, respectively, and the uncertainly of asteroid color measurements into account. We use 2D gaussian distribution with a covariance matrix equal to (cid:18) A2 err 0 0 err (cid:19) (R - I)2 to represent the probability distribution of each object in A, R − I space. Therefore, the fraction of a object in a specific taxonomic type is its prob- ability distribution multiply a Complementary Error Function, which is the cumulative function of a gaussian distribution with the mean value equal to boundary value and standard deviation equal to the uncertainty of boundary. Figure 8 shows the fraction of asteroid types in our weighted and unweighted sample. 21 n o i t c a r f 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Weighted Unweighted C S V/Q/R Figure 8 Histograms of the fractions of estimated asteroid spectral types. C and S are C-complex and S-complex asteroids, respectively, and V/Q/R indicates V/Q/R-type-like asteroids. Since our sample exhibits a HV range similar to that of the near-Earth asteroid sample used by Dandy et al. (2003), it is worth to compare the fraction of asteroid's type to that of NEA population. The Q/S ratio in our observation is less than 0.05 in the main-belt region. By contrast, the Q/S ratio in the near earth space is about 0.5 (Binzel et al., 2004) to 2 (Dandy et al., 2003), which is much higher than in the main-belt. Finally, we tested the correlation between HV and R − I of S-complex asteroids. As shown in Figure 9, unlike the result of Dandy et al. (2003) in which the absorption band depth was correlated with S-complex NEA size, we did not find any evidence that R− I color has significant correlation with the size of S-complex MBA. 4. Discussion There are only two possible Q-type asteroids candidates in our km to sub- km sized MBA sample (see Figure 6). This fact indicates that the Q-type asteroids are rare in the main-belt. The Q/S ratio is less than 0.05, which is significantly lower than the value of NEAs (∼ 0.5 in Binzel et al. (2004) and ∼ 2 in Dandy et al. (2003)). This result is also comparable with the 22 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 -0.05 -0.1 -0.15 2 3 3 . 0 - I - R -0.2 16 16.5 17 17.5 18.5 19 19.5 20 18 HV Figure 9 Variation of R−I color (an indicator of absorption band depth) as a function of the absolute magnitude, Hv, for the observed S-complex MBAs. Q-type-like fraction in Carvano et al. (2010), which the main belt Q/S ratio is 325/3784 ∼ 0.09 for the good classified asteroids in SDSSMOC4. Since most of S-complex MBAs are weathered, we can estimate the upper limit of space weathering timescale in main belt by using the collisional size- age relation in Bottke et al. (2005) and Willman and Jedicke (2011): Ts(yr) = 3.23 × 10(11.0−0.18Hv ) (14) The Hv range of our MBA samples are between 16 to 20 magnitude, and their corresponding collisional ages are between 8 × 107 to 4× 108 years. We can safely conclude that the space weathering timescale in main belt should be less than 108 years. The lack of Q-type MBAs also suggests two facts: 1. Most of the Q- type NEAs did not come from main-belt, they must form in-situ, and 2. collision is not the main mechanism of the formation of Q-type NEAs due to the collision rate being lower in the near Earth region. There must exist other mechanisms to generate such large amount of Q-type NEAs, and these mechanisms are more effective in the near Earth region than the main-belt. The planetary encounter model (Binzel et al., 2010; Nesvorn´y et al., 2010) advocating the recent resetting of S-type asteroid surfaces by the effects of tidal stress is one of the possible mechanisms. 23 Another possible mechanism that could be responsible for the formation of Q-type NEAs is YORP effect spin-up induced rotational-fission or sur- face re-arrangement of asteroids. The acceleration rate of asteroid spin by the YORP effect is inversely proportional to the square of semi-major axis and more effective in the near Earth region than in the main-belt due to the smaller heliocentric distance (Rubincam, 2000; Scheeres, 2007). Thus, if rotational-fission mechanism or rotational re-arrangement is also several times more effective to create Q-type NEAs than Q-type MBAs, it may be able to explain why the Q/S ratio in NEAs is about 10 to 40 times larger than Q/S ratio in MBAs. The YORP spin-up can also explain the existence of main-belt Q-type asteroids (see Polishook et al. (2014) for detail). It indicates the size-color (or size-S/Q ratio) dependence of S-complex MBAs, because the smaller as- teroid is easier to be accelerated to near the break-up limit resulting in the Q-type-like color. However, such relation is not shown in our sample. There are two possible effects that may cause the lack of size dependence: 1. The "secondary fission" of rotational-fission models provided by Jacobson and Scheeres (2011) may be the more likely model to create main-belt Q-type asteroids. This model implies the destruction of the secondary of pair asteroids by pri- mary's tidal forces. For the km to sub-km sized asteroid pair, the gravity may be too small to deform secondary and produce Q-type surface. 2. A size-dependent strength for asteroids in addition to gravity (Holsapple, 2007) can prevent the break-up of small asteroids. The existence of sub-km sized super-fast rotator, such as (29075) 1950 DA (Rozitis et al., 2014) and (335433) 2005 UW163 (Chang et al., 2014), might be the evidence of the existence of this internal strength. The other mechanism is thermal degradation of the rocks on asteroid surface from Delbo et al. (2014). This process is strongly dependent on the value of diurnal temperature difference, which is a function of perihelion distance; it takes ∼ 105 yrs in near Earth region and ∼ 107 yrs in the main- belt to break 90% of 3 centimeter diameter size rocks. If thermal degradation dominates the formation of Q-type asteroids, space weathering must have timescale < 107yrs to keep low Q/S ratio in the main-belt. 5. Summary We surveyed kilometer- to sub-kilometer-sized asteroids in the main belt by using the Subaru telescope. A total of 150 asteroids with BVRI colors 24 were detected and 75 of them exhibited satisfactory photometry accuracy. The main results can be summarized as follows: 1. Q-type asteroids are rare in the main-belt; only two Q-type candidates were detected in our sample, and the Q-type to S-type ratio is less than 0.05 in main-belt. 2. Unlike the size-color dependence of NEAs found by Dandy et al. (2003), we did not found any evidence of that in MBA population. 3. The space weathering timescale in the main belt should be less than 108 years. 4. Re-arrangement of surface material of S-type asteroid by tidal stress dur- ing planetary encounters and thermal degradation are possible mechanisms of Q-type NEAs formation. YORP spin-up induced rotational-fission or sur- face re-arrangement of asteroids could be responsible for both Q-type MBAs and NEAs formation. Acknowledgments We also acknowledge the anonymous referees' useful suggestions for im- proving the manuscript. This work is based on data collected at Subaru Telescope, which is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. This work was supported in part by NSC Grant: NSC 101-2119- M-008-007-MY3 and NSC 102-2119-M-008-001. The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys (PS1) have been made possible through contributions by the Institute for Astronomy, the University of Hawaii, the Pan-STARRS Project Office, the Max-Planck Society and its participating institutes, the Max Planck Insti- tute for Astronomy, Heidelberg and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterres- trial Physics, Garching, The Johns Hopkins University, Durham University, the University of Edinburgh, the Queen's University Belfast, the Harvard- Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated, the National Central University of Taiwan, the Space Telescope Science Institute, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. NNX08AR22G issued through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate, the National Science Foundation Grant No. AST-1238877, the University of Maryland, Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE), and the Los Alamos National Laboratory. 25 References Bernstein, G., Khushalani, B. 2000. Orbit Fitting and Uncertainties for Kuiper Belt Objects. The Astronomical Journal 120, 3323-3332. Binzel, R. P., Xu, S., Bus, S. J., Skrutskie, M. F., Meyer, M. R., Knezek, P., Barker, E. S. 1993. Discovery of a Main-Belt Asteroid Resembling Ordinary Chondrite Meteorites. Science 262, 1541-1543. Binzel, R. P., Bus, S. J., Burbine, T. H., Sunshine, J. M. 1996. Spectral Prop- erties of Near-Earth Asteroids: Evidence for Sources of Ordinary Chondrite Meteorites. Science 273, 946-948. Binzel, R. P., Harris, A. W., Bus, S. J., Burbine, T. H. 2001. Spectral Prop- erties of Near-Earth Objects: Palomar and IRTF Results for 48 Objects Including Spacecraft Targets (9969) Braille and (10302) 1989 ML. Icarus 151, 139-149. Binzel, R. P., Rivkin, A. S., Stuart, J. S., Harris, A. W., Bus, S. J., Burbine, T. H. 2004. Observed spectral properties of near-Earth objects: results for population distribution, source regions, and space weathering processes. Icarus 170, 259-294. Binzel, R. P., Morbidelli, A., Merouane, S., DeMeo, F. E., Birlan, M., Ver- nazza, P., Thomas, C. A., Rivkin, A. S., Bus, S. J., Tokunaga, A. T. 2010. Earth encounters as the origin of fresh surfaces on near-Earth asteroids. Nature 463, 331-334. Bottke, W. F., Jr., Nolan, M. C., Greenberg, R. 1993. Collision lifetimes and impact statistics of near-Earth asteroids. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 24, 159-160. Bottke, W. F., Nolan, M. C., Greenberg, R., Kolvoord, R. A. 1994. Velocity distributions among colliding asteroids. Icarus 107, 255-268. Bottke, W. F., Morbidelli, A., Jedicke, R., Petit, J.-M., Levison, H. F., Michel, P., Metcalfe, T. S. 2002. Debiased Orbital and Absolute Magnitude Distribution of the Near-Earth Objects. Icarus 156, 399-433. Bottke, W. F., Durda, D. D., Nesvorn´y, D., Jedicke, R., Morbidelli, A., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Levison, H. 2005. The fossilized size distribution of the main asteroid belt. Icarus 175, 111-140. 26 Bottke, W. F., Durda, D. D., Nesvorn´y, D., Jedicke, R., Morbidelli, A., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Levison, H. F. 2005. Linking the collisional history of the main asteroid belt to its dynamical excitation and depletion. Icarus 179, 63-94. Bowell, E., Chapman, C. R., Gradie, J. C., Morrison, D., Zellner, B. 1978. Taxonomy of asteroids. Icarus 35, 313-335. Bowell, E., Lumme, K. 1979. Colorimetry and magnitudes of asteroids. As- teroids 132-169. Brunetto, R., Vernazza, P., Marchi, S., Birlan, M., Fulchignoni, M., Orofino, V., Strazzulla, G. 2006. Modeling asteroid surfaces from observations and irradiation experiments: The case of 832 Karin. Icarus 184, 327-337. Bus, S. J., Binzel, R. P. 2002. Phase II of the Small Main-Belt Asteroid Spectroscopic Survey. The Observations. Icarus 158, 106-145. Bus, S. J., Binzel, R. P. 2002. Phase II of the Small Main-Belt Asteroid Spectroscopic Survey. A Feature-Based Taxonomy. Icarus 158, 146-177. Carvano, J. M., Hasselmann, P. H., Lazzaro, D., Moth´e-Diniz, T. 2010. SDSS-based taxonomic classification and orbital distribution of main belt asteroids. Astronomy and Astrophysics 510, AA43. Chang, C.-K., Waszczak, A., Lin, H.-W., Ip, W.-H., Prince, T. A., Kulka- rni, S. R., Laher, R., Surace, J. 2014. A New Large Super-fast Rotator: (335433) 2005 UW163. The Astrophysical Journal 791, L35. Chapman, C. R. 1996. S-Type Asteroids, Ordinary Chondrites, and Space Weathering: The Evidence from Galileo's Fly-bys of Gaspra and Ida. Me- teoritics and Planetary Science 31, 699-725. Chapman, C. R. 2004. Space Weathering of Asteroid Surfaces. Annual Re- view of Earth and Planetary Sciences 32, 539-567. Chapman, C. R. 2010. Asteroids: Stripped on passing by Earth. Nature 463, 305-306. Clark, B. E., and 11 colleagues 2001. Space weathering on Eros: Constraints from albedo and spectral measurements of Psyche crater. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 36, 1617-1637. 27 Clark, B. E., Helfenstein, P., Bell, J. F., Peterson, C., Veverka, J., Izenberg, N. I., Domingue, D., Wellnitz, D., McFadden, L. 2002. NEAR Infrared Spectrometer Photometry of Asteroid 433 Eros. Icarus 155, 189-204. Dandy, C. L., Fitzsimmons, A., Collander-Brown, S. J. 2003. Optical colors of 56 near-Earth objects: trends with size and orbit. Icarus 163, 363-373. Davis, D. R., Durda, D. D., Marzari, F., Campo Bagatin, A., Gil-Hutton, R. 2002. Collisional Evolution of Small-Body Populations. Asteroids III 545-558. Delbo, M., Libourel, G., Wilkerson, J., Murdoch, N., Michel, P., Ramesh, K. T., Ganino, C., Verati, C., Marchi, S. 2014. Thermal fatigue as the origin of regolith on small asteroids. Nature 508, 233-236. DeMeo, F. E., Binzel, R. P., Slivan, S. M., Bus, S. J. 2009. An extension of the Bus asteroid taxonomy into the near-infrared. Icarus 202, 160-180. DeMeo, F. E., Carry, B. 2013. The taxonomic distribution of asteroids from multi-filter all-sky photometric surveys. Icarus 226, 723-741. DeMeo, F. E., Carry, B. 2014. Solar System evolution from compositional mapping of the asteroid belt. Nature 505, 629-634. DeMeo, F. E., Binzel, R. P., Lockhart, M. 2014. Mars encounters cause fresh surfaces on some near-Earth asteroids. Icarus 227, 112-122. Hapke, B. 2001. Space weathering from Mercury to the asteroid belt. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, 10039-10074. Holmberg, J., Flynn, C., Portinari, L. 2006. The colours of the Sun. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 367, 449-453. Holsapple, K. A. 2007. Spin limits of Solar System bodies: From the small fast-rotators to 2003 EL61. Icarus 187, 500-509. Ishiguro, M., and 18 colleagues 2007. Global mapping of the degree of space weathering on asteroid 25143 Itokawa by Hayabusa/AMICA observations. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 42, 1791-1800. 28 Ivezi´c, Z., and 32 colleagues 2001. Solar System Objects Observed in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Commissioning Data. The Astronomical Journal 122, 2749-2784. Jacobson, S. A., Scheeres, D. J. 2011. Dynamics of rotationally fissioned asteroids: Source of observed small asteroid systems. Icarus 214, 161-178. Jedicke, R., Nesvorn´y, D., Whiteley, R., Ivezi´c, Z., Juri´c, M. 2004. An age- colour relationship for main-belt S-complex asteroids. Nature 429, 275-277. Lantz, C., Clark, B. E., Barucci, M. A., Lauretta, D. S. 2013. Evidence for the effects of space weathering spectral signatures on low albedo asteroids. Astronomy and Astrophysics 554, A138. Lazzaro, D., Angeli, C. A., Carvano, J. M., Moth´e-Diniz, T., Duffard, R., Florczak, M. 2004. S 3OS 2: the visible spectroscopic survey of 820 aster- oids. Icarus 172, 179-220. Magnier, E. A., and 13 colleagues 2013. The Pan-STARRS 1 Photometric Reference Ladder, Release 12.01. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 205, 20. Marchi, S., Magrin, S., Nesvorn´y, D., Paolicchi, P., Lazzarin, M. 2006. A spectral slope versus perihelion distance correlation for planet-crossing as- teroids. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 368, L39-L42. Migliorini, F., Michel, P., Morbidelli, A., Nesvorny, D., Zappala, V. 1998. Origin of Multikilometer Earth- and Mars-Crossing Asteroids: A Quanti- tative Simulation. Science 281, 2022. Miyazaki, S., and 14 colleagues 2002. Subaru Prime Focus Camera -- Suprime- Cam. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 54, 833-853. Morbidelli, A., Vokrouhlick´y, D. 2003. The Yarkovsky-driven origin of near- Earth asteroids. Icarus 163, 120-134. Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorn´y, D., Levison, H. F. 2009. Asteroids were born big. Icarus 204, 558-573. Moth´e-Diniz, T., Nesvorn´y, D. 2008. Visible spectroscopy of extremely young asteroid families. Astronomy and Astrophysics 486, L9-L12. 29 Nakamura, T., Yoshida, F. 2002. Statistical Method for Deriving Spatial and Size Distributions of Sub-km Main-Belt Asteroids from Their Sky Motions. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 54, 1079-1089. Nesvorn´y, D., Jedicke, R., Whiteley, R. J., Ivezi´c, Z. 2005. Evidence for asteroid space weathering from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Icarus 173, 132-152. Nesvorn´y, D., Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Chapman, C. R., Rafkin, S. 2010. Do planetary encounters reset surfaces of near Earth asteroids?. Icarus 209, 510-519. Padmanabhan, N., and 23 colleagues 2008. An Improved Photometric Cali- bration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data. The Astrophysical Journal 674, 1217-1233. Petit, J.-M., Holman, M. J., Gladman, B. J., Kavelaars, J. J., Scholl, H., Loredo, T. J. 2006. The Kuiper Belt luminosity function from mR= 22 to 25. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 365, 429-438. Polishook, D., Moskovitz, N., Binzel, R. P., DeMeo, F. E., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Zizka, J., Oszkiewicz, D. 2014. Observations of fresh and weathered surfaces on asteroid pairs and their implications on the rotational-fission mechanism. Icarus 233, 9-26. Rabinowitz, D. L. 1997. Are Main-Belt Asteroids a Sufficient Source for the Earth-Approaching Asteroids?. Icarus 127, 33-54. Rivkin, A. S., Thomas, C. A., Trilling, D. E., Enga, M.-t., Grier, J. A. 2011. Ordinary chondrite-like colors in small Koronis family members. Icarus 211, 1294-1297. Rozitis, B., Maclennan, E., Emery, J. P. 2014. Cohesive forces prevent the rotational breakup of rubble-pile asteroid (29075) 1950 DA. Nature 512, 174-176. Rubincam, D. P. 2000. Radiative Spin-up and Spin-down of Small Asteroids. Icarus 148, 2-11. Sasaki, S., Nakamura, K., Hamabe, Y., Kurahashi, E., Hiroi, T. 2001. Pro- duction of iron nanoparticles by laser irradiation in a simulation of lunar- like space weathering. Nature 410, 555-557. 30 Schlafly, E. F., and 16 colleagues 2012. Photometric Calibration of the First 1.5 Years of the Pan-STARRS1 Survey. The Astrophysical Journal 756, 158. Scheeres, D. J. 2007. The dynamical evolution of uniformly rotating asteroids subject to YORP. Icarus 188, 430-450. Scheeres, D. J. 2015. Landslides and Mass shedding on spinning spheroidal asteroids. Icarus 247, 1-17. Stuart, J. S., Binzel, R. P. 2004. Bias-corrected population, size distribution, and impact hazard for the near-Earth objects. Icarus 170, 295-311. Tholen, D. J. 1984. Asteroid taxonomy from cluster analysis of Photometry. Ph.D. Thesis . Thomas, C. A., Rivkin, A. S., Trilling, D. E., Enga, M.-t., Grier, J. A. 2011. Space weathering of small Koronis family members. Icarus 212, 158-166. Thomas, C. A., Trilling, D. E., Rivkin, A. S. 2012. Space weathering of small Koronis family asteroids in the SDSS Moving Object Catalog. Icarus 219, 505-507. Tonry, J. L., and 13 colleagues 2012. The Pan-STARRS1 Photometric Sys- tem. The Astrophysical Journal 750, 99. Veres, P., Jedicke, R., Denneau, L., Wainscoat, R., Holman, M. J., Lin, H.-W. 2012. Improved Asteroid Astrometry and Photometry with Trail Fitting. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 124, 1197-1207. Vernazza, P., Binzel, R. P., Rossi, A., Fulchignoni, M., Birlan, M. 2009. Solar wind as the origin of rapid reddening of asteroid surfaces. Nature 458, 993-995. Walsh, K. J., Richardson, D. C., Michel, P. 2012. Spin-up of rubble-pile asteroids: Disruption, satellite formation, and equilibrium shapes. Icarus 220, 514-529. Willman, M., Jedicke, R., Nesvorn´y, D., Moskovitz, N., Ivezi´c, Z., Fevig, R. 2008. Redetermination of the space weathering rate using spectra of Iannini asteroid family members. Icarus 195, 663-673. 31 Willman, M., Jedicke, R., Moskovitz, N., Nesvorn´y, D., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Moth´e-Diniz, T. 2010. Using the youngest asteroid clusters to constrain the space weathering and gardening rate on S-complex asteroids. Icarus 208, 758-772. Willman, M., Jedicke, R. 2011. Asteroid age distributions determined by space weathering and collisional evolution models. Icarus 211, 504-510. Yoshida, F., Nakamura, T. 2007. Subaru Main Belt Asteroid Survey (SM- BAS) - Size and color distributions of small main-belt asteroids. Planetary and Space Science 55, 1113-1125. Zellner, B., Tholen, D. J., Tedesco, E. F. 1985. The eight-color asteroid survey - Results for 589 minor planets. Icarus 61, 355-416. 32
1603.09391	2	1603	2016-11-02T19:16:05	New Planetary Systems from the Calan-Hertfordshire Extrasolar Planet Search	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	We report the discovery of eight new giant planets, and updated orbits for four known planets, orbiting dwarf and subgiant stars using the CORALIE, HARPS, and MIKE instruments as part of the Calan-Hertfordshire Extrasolar Planet Search. The planets have masses in the range 1.1-5.4MJs, orbital periods from 40-2900 days, and eccentricities from 0.0-0.6. They include a double-planet system orbiting the most massive star in our sample (HD147873), two eccentric giant planets (HD128356b and HD154672b), and a rare 14 Herculis analogue (HD224538b). We highlight some population correlations from the sample of radial velocity detected planets orbiting nearby stars, including the mass function exponential distribution, confirmation of the growing body of evidence that low-mass planets tend to be found orbiting more metal-poor stars than giant planets, and a possible period-metallicity correlation for planets with masses >0.1MJ, based on a metallicity difference of 0.16 dex between the population of planets with orbital periods less than 100 days and those with orbital periods greater than 100 days.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) Preprint 3 November 2016 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 New Planetary Systems from the Calan-Hertfordshire Extrasolar Planet Search J.S. Jenkins1⋆, H.R.A. Jones2, M. Tuomi2, M. D´ıaz1, J.P. Cordero1, A. Aguayo1, B. Pantoja1, P. Arriagada3, R. Mahu4, R. Brahm5, P. Rojo1, M.G. Soto1, O. Ivanyuk6, N. Becerra Yoma4, A.C. Day-Jones1, M.T. Ruiz1, Y.V. Pavlenko2,6, J.R. Barnes7, F. Murgas8, D.J. Pinfield2, M.I. Jones9, M. L´opez-Morales10, S. Shectman11, R.P. Butler3, D. Minniti12 1Departamento de Astronomia, Universidad de Chile, Camino el Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile, Casilla 36-D 2Center for Astrophysics, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK, AL10 9AB 3Carnegie Institution of Washington, Dept. of Terrestrial Magnetism, 5241 Broad Branch Rd. NW, 20015, Washington D.C., USA 4Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Av. Tupper 2007, PO Box 412-3, Santiago, Chile 5Instituto de Astrof´ısica, Facultad de F´ısica, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Av. Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile 6Main Astronomical Observatory, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Golosiiv Woods, Kyiv-127, 03680 Ukraine 7Department of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK 8Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias, Via Lactea, E38205, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 9Center of Astro-Engineering UC, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Av. Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile 10Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 11Carnegie Institution of Washington, The Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101-1292, USA 12Departamento de Ciencias Fisicas, Universidad Andres Bello, Republica 220, Santiago, Chile Submitted January 2011 ABSTRACT We report the discovery of eight new giant planets, and updated orbits for four known planets, orbiting dwarf and subgiant stars using the CORALIE, HARPS, and MIKE instruments as part of the Calan-Hertfordshire Extrasolar Planet Search. The planets have masses in the range 1.1-5.4MJ's, orbital periods from 40-2900 days, and eccentricities from 0.0-0.6. They include a double-planet system orbiting the most massive star in our sample (HD147873), two eccentric giant planets (HD128356b and HD154672b), and a rare 14 Herculis analogue (HD224538b). We highlight some popu- lation correlations from the sample of radial velocity detected planets orbiting nearby stars, including the mass function exponential distribution, confirmation of the grow- ing body of evidence that low-mass planets tend to be found orbiting more metal-poor stars than giant planets, and a possible period-metallicity correlation for planets with masses >0.1 MJ, based on a metallicity difference of 0.16 dex between the popula- tion of planets with orbital periods less than 100 days and those with orbital periods greater than 100 days. Key words: stars: planetary systems; planets and satellites: formation; stars: activity; stars: low- mass; stars: solar-type 6 1 0 2 v o N 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 1 9 3 9 0 . 3 0 6 1 : v i X r a 1 INTRODUCTION After the discovery and confirmation of the hot Jupiter Dimidium (aka. Helvetios b or 51 Pegasi b) in 1995, our view of giant planets was changed forever. Giant planets orbiting ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] c(cid:13) 2002 The Authors dwarf stars like the Sun have been found to inhabit many re- gions of the parameter space. The first of these were found orbiting their stars with periods much shorter than those of Jupiter in our solar system (e.g. Mayor & Queloz 1995; Marcy & Butler 1996). More recently as the number of giant planets has grown, a new population of eccentric gas giants has been shown to exist (e.g. Jones et al. 2006; Tamuz et al. 2008; Arriagada et al. 2010), making up a large fraction of 2 J.S. Jenkins et al. the known systems, at least around main sequence stars since the same high fraction does not appear to be present around giant stars (Jones et al. 2014). These planets seem to span the full range of masses from the sub-Jupiter range all the way up to the mass boundary between giant planets and brown dwarfs. It has been thoroughly demonstrated that there is a clear bias to metal-rich stars hosting giant planets across the currently sampled range of orbital separa- tions (Fischer & Valenti 2005; Sousa et al. 2011), a bias that seems to hold for stars beyond the main sequence (e.g. Reffert et al. 2015; Soto et al. 2015; Jones et al. 2016). In comparison, recent work appears to show that stars that host lower-mass planets have a metallicity distribu- tion that is indistinguishable from those that host no known planets at all (Udry et al. 2007; Jenkins et al. 2013b; Sousa et al. 2011; Buchhave & Latham 2015). Furthermore, Jenkins et al. suggests there exists a boundary that delimits a planet desert for the lowest mass planets in the metal-rich regime. Such results show there is a fundamental relation- ship between the proto-planetary disc metallicity and the mass of planets that form in these discs, indicating further study of the planetary mass function and its relationship with metallicity is warranted. Since metallicity plays a key role in the formation of the observed planetary systems, explained well by na- ture's merging of core accretion and planet migration (e.g. Ida & Lin 2004; Mordasini et al. 2012), and now we are reaching a population size where less obvious correlations can reveal themselves, studying the current population of known planets can provide a window into the fundamentals of planet formation and evolution for the stars nearest to the Sun. In 2007 we started a radial velocity planet search pro- gram on the HARPS instrument at La Silla Chile, with the goal of finding more gas giant planets orbiting super metal-rich stars to increase the statistics, whilst also fol- lowing up any discoveries to search for transit events. The first results from this work and the target sample were discussed in Jenkins et al. (2009) and since then our pro- gram has expanded to make use of the CORALIE spectro- graph (Jenkins et al. 2011b,a, 2013a). This current paper announces the first planets from this survey detected using CORALIE and goes on to study the planet mass-metallicity plane to search for correlations between these two parame- ters. In this work we describe the latest efforts from our Calan-Hertfordshire Extrasolar Planet Search, which builds on previous work by this group. We include the new giant planets we have detected in this program with the large sam- ple of gas giants detected by radial velocity measurements that already exist in the literature, in order to continue the search for emerging correlations that allow us a more strin- gent insight into the nature of these objects. In § 2 we de- scribe the measurements used in this work. In § 3 we discuss the sample selection, introduce the new giant planet detec- tions from this survey, and discuss some characteristics of their host stars. In § 4 we perform tests of the mass function and its relationship to stellar metallicity, along with search- ing for correlations between these parameters and planetary orbital period and we briefly discuss the impact of these re- sults. Finally, in § 5 we summerise the main points of the present work. 2 OBSERVATIONS AND REDUCTION The radial velocity datasets for these stars were observed using the precision radial velocity spectrographs CORALIE, HARPS, and MIKE. Both the CORALIE and HARPS spec- trographs are physically located at the ESO La Silla Obser- vatory in Chile, where CORALIE is mounted on the Swiss Euler telescope and HARPS is fed by light from the ESO 3.6m telescope. The MIKE spectrograph is located at the Las Campanas Observatory and is mounted on the Magel- lan Clay 6.5m telescope. In this work, 570 radial velocities are reported, with a fairly even split between CORALIE and HARPS observa- tions, in comparison to the smaller fraction of MIKE data. The baseline of observations for the CORALIE data run from 2009 November 25th until 2015 October 23rd (BJD 2455160.53623 - 2457318.85147), whereas the HARPS data runs from 2007 May 28th until 2013 September 28th (BJD 2454248.60231 - 2456563.90982) showing that the HARPS data covers a longer baseline but the CORALIE data has better sampling coverage in general for these targets. The MIKE velocities run from 2003 August 13th until 2009 July 7th (BJD 2452864.57934 - 2455019.6938), covering a base- line of six years that overlaps with the HARPS baseline but not the CORALIE data. 2.1 CORALIE The analysis of CORALIE data involves the normal echelle reduction steps, such as debiasing the images using CCD bias frames, order location and tracing using polynomial fitting methods and aperture order filtering, pixel-to-pixel sensitivity correction (flatfielding) by building a normalised master flatfield image and dividing out the master flat- field from the other images, scattered-light removal by mea- suring the contribution to the total light profile in the inter-order regions, order extraction using a profile fitting method (Marsh 1989), and finally building a precise 2D wavelength solution that is good to ∼2.5 m s−1overall preci- sion (Jord´an et al. 2014; Brahm & Jordan 2016). The final steps in the analysis include cross-correlating the individual spectra with a binary mask (either G2, K0, K5, or M2 de- pending on the spectral type of the star, see Baranne et al. 1996 and Pepe et al. 2002) and fitting the cross-correlation function (CCF) with a gaussian to measure the radial ve- locity, along with the width of the CCF to generate realis- tic uncertainties. The instrumental drift is then measured and removed from the overall velocity by performing a sec- ond cross-correlation between the simultaneously measured Thorium-Argon (ThAr) lamp (simultaneously referring to observations where the second optical fibre illuminates the spectrograph with ThAr light) and a previously measured double ThAr observation where both fibres have been fed by light from the ThAr calibration lamp. These double ThAr measurements are generally taken every 1.5-2 hours throughout the night to continually reset the wavelength so- lution zero-point. These steps were discussed in Jord´an et al. MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) (2014), however the overall performance in term of stability is shown in Appendix A. An important additional step in the calculation of the radial velocities from CORALIE is the characterisation of the offset between the data collected prior to the November 2014 upgrade of the instrument. As part of this upgrade, the CORALIE circular fibres were replaced with octagonal fibres to increase illumination stability, the double-scrambler was reintroduced into the system, and a focal mirror that focuses light on the guiding camera was replaced. Such instrumen- tal upgrades are expected to introduce systematic offsets in the radial velocity measurements compared to pre-upgrade observations. In an attempt to account for the offset between the CORALIE reference velocities observed before and after the upgrade, we first determined this offset in our two radial velocity reference targets, HD72673 and HD157347. We de- note the mean estimate for the offset x0 based on these reference targets as µ0 and its standard error as σ0. We then used these numbers to construct a prior probability for the offset x1 in the first data set of our sample such that π(x1) = N (µ0, σ2 0). This prior was used to calculate a pos- terior for the offset and we denote the mean and standard deviation of this obtained posterior with µ1 and σ1, respec- tively. After that, we adopted the refined estimate of the offset of µi ± σi to construct the prior for the offset xi+1 in the next data set, such that π(xi+1) = N (µi, σ2 i ). This process, called 'Bayesian updating' because the prior is up- dated into a posterior density that is in turn used as as the next prior, was repeated until all the data sets were anal- ysed. This process helps to account for all the information regarding the offsets from all the data sets without having to analyse them simultaneously. As a result, we summarise the information regarding the offset as a probability distri- bution that is almost Gaussian in the sense that the third and fourth moments are very close to zero. This density has a mean of 19.2 ms−1 an a standard deviation of 4.8 ms−1 , which indicates that an offset in the reference velocity of roughly 20 ms−1 is significantly present in the CORALIE data sets after the upgrade for the stars included in this work. 2.2 HARPS For HARPS, the steps are similar to those mentioned above, but the data is automatically processed by the HARPS-DRS version 3.5 which is based in general on the procedure ex- plained in Baranne et al. (1996). The nightly drift of the ThAr lines are found to be below 0.5 m s−1and including the other sources of uncertainty such as centering and guid- ing (<30 cm s−1), a stability of less than 1 m s−1is found for this spectrograph over the long term (see Lo Curto et al. 2010). 2.3 MIKE For the radial velocities measured using the MIKE spectro- graph, the reduction steps are similar but the analysis pro- cedure is different. MIKE uses a cell filled with molecular iodine (I2) that is placed directly in the beam of light from the target star before entering the spectrograph, and this is MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 3 used to record the instrument point spread function (PSF) and provide a highly accurate wavelength fiducial. The full analysis procedure is explained in Butler et al. (1996), but in short, the velocities are measured by comparing each star+I2 spectrum to that of a template measurement of the same star. This template is observed without the I2 cell in place, such that one can deconvolve the instrument's PSF from the template observation, usually accomplished by ob- serving a rapidly rotating B-star with the I2 cell in place before and after the template observation and extrapolating the PSF from these observations to that of the template. The deconvolved template can then be used to forward model each observation by convolving it with a very high resolu- tion and high S/N I2 spectrum and a modeled PSF. The final stability of MIKE is found to be between that of CORALIE and HARPS, around the 5 m s−1level of velocity precision. 3 THE STARS AND THEIR DOPPLER SIGNALS The selection of the Calan-Hertfordshire Extrasolar Planet Search (CHEPS) target sample is discussed in Jenkins et al. (2009) but we outline the main selection criteria here. The stars are generally selected to be late-F to early-K stars, with a B − V range between 0.5-0.9, and with a small num- ber of redder stars included to allow the study of activ- ity correlations and timescales between activity indicators and the measured Doppler velocities. The positions of the CHEPS sample on a colour-magnitude diagram are shown in Fig. 1 (squares) compared to a general selection of nearby stars from the Hipparcos catalogue (circles), along with the targets discussed in this work (stars). The magnitude lim- its we set are between 7.5-9.5 in the V optical band and after preliminary screening with the FEROS spectrograph (Jenkins et al. 2008), we predominantly selected chromo- spherically quiet stars, and those that are metal-rich (pri- mary sample having logR′ HK indices 6 -4.9 dex and [Fe/H] > +0.1 dex, with some stars outside of these selection limits to use as comparisons). The positions of the stars reported here on an HR-diagram are shown in the inset plot in Fig. 1. The Y2 isomass tracks are also shown (Demarque et al. 2004) for masses of 1.0-1.3 M⊙ , increasing in mass towards higher luminosities, and with a fixed metallicity of +0.2 dex. The characteristics of the targets we discuss in this work are shown in Table 1. Since the planets reported here are gas giants, the ra- dial velocity signals of these stars are fairly large, and hence one might expect that we can detect frequencies for all of them using standard periodogram analyses to hunt for power peaks in the Fourier power spectrum, or minimum mean square error (MMSE) spectrum (e.g. Dawson & Fabrycky 2010; Jenkins et al. 2014). However, the search for the best solutions can be complicated, particularly for combined data sets from independent spectrographs because the sets have different baselines, data samplings, and uncertainties that all have to be accounted for in a search for periodic signals. The signals we discuss in this work are a mixture of well, and moderately well sampled data, such that some signals are more problematic to detect than others. Moreover, the inclusion of a linear trend that could be present in the data of a given target due to a long period companion, will cause 4 J.S. Jenkins et al. Table 1. Stellar parameters for the hosts. Parameter HD9174 HD48265 HD68402 HD72892 HD128356 HD143361 ′ HK Spectral TypeHipp B − VHipp V π (mas) distance (pc) logR Hipparcos N obs Hipparcos σ ∆MV T eff (K) L⋆/L⊙ M⋆ /M⊙ R⋆/R⊙ [Fe/H] log g U,V,W (km/s) vsini (km/s) Age (Gyrs) G8IV 0.761±0.002 8.40 12.67±0.62 78.93±3.86 -5.23 92 0.014 1.478 5577±100 2.41±0.18 1.03±0.05 1.67±0.07 0.39±0.10 4.03±0.05 22.2,-56.5,-29 2.1±0.2 9±3 G5IV/V 0.747±0.014 8.05 11.71±0.58 85.40±4.23 -5.24 98 0.009 1.914 5650±100 3.84±0.19 1.28±0.05 2.05±0.05 0.40±0.10 3.92±0.03 -14.2,-24.0,4.5 3.1±0.3 5±3 G5IV/V 0.660±0.021 9.11 12.82±0.61 78.00±3.71 -4.95 107 0.017 0.108 5950±100 1.17±0.06 1.12±0.05 1.02±0.05 0.29±0.10 4.47±0.05 -37.5,-16.3,-17.3 2.9±0.2 2±3 G5V 0.686±0.015 8.83 13.74±0.83 72.78±4.40 -5.03 92 0.016 0.405 5688±100 1.40±0.09 1.02±0.05 1.22±0.06 0.25±0.10 4.27±0.05 72.2,-2.0,-15.8 2.7±0.2 8±3 K3V 1.017±0.015∗ 8.29 38.41±0.77 26.03±0.52 -5.07 72 0.013 0.553 4875±100 0.36±0.01 0.65±0.05 0.85±0.02 0.17±0.10 4.52±0.06 30.8,-28.7,8.8 1.3±0.1 10±5 G6V 0.773±0.004 9.20 15.23±1.18 65.66±5.09 -5.12 96 0.016 0.349 5505±100 0.81±0.06 0.95±0.05 0.99±0.08 0.22±0.10 4.42±0.08 -24.4,-49.5,3.7 1.5±0.1 5±5 Parameter HD147873 HD152079 HD154672 HD165155 HD224538 ′ HK Spectral TypeHip B − VHip V π (mas) distance (pc) logR Hipparcos N obs Hipparcos σ ∆MV T eff (K) L⋆/L⊙ M⋆ /M⊙ R⋆/R⊙ [Fe/H] log g U,V,W (km/s) vsini (km/s) Age (Gyrs) G1V 0.575±0.012 7.96 9.53±0.99 104.93±10.90 -5.27 88 0.011 1.337 5972±100 5.99±0.62 1.38±0.05 2.29±0.10 -0.03±0.10 3.86±0.05 18.7,-18.2,3.2 5.9±0.5 4±3 G6V 0.711±0.025 9.18 12.00±1.52 83.33±10.56 -4.99 84 0.014 0.508 5726±100 1.28±0.16 1.10±0.05 1.15±0.13 0.16±0.10 4.36±0.10 -39.6,-46.2,10.2 1.8±0.1 3±3 G3IV 0.713±0.013 8.21 15.44±0.84 64.77±3.52 -5.12 120 0.014 0.943 5655±100 1.91±0.10 1.08±0.05 1.44±0.05 0.11±0.10 4.15±0.05 -20.0,-18.7,-29.1 2.2±0.2 8±3 G8V 1.018±0.095 9.36 15.39±1.72 64.98±7.26 -5.18 67 0.019 1.373 5426±100 0.70±0.08 1.02±0.05 0.95±0.11 0.09±0.10 4.49±0.11 13.3,9.8,-20.5 1.5±0.1 11±4 F9IV/V 0.581±0.006 8.06 12.86±0.73 77.76±4.41 -4.99 163 0.017 0.627 6097±100 2.95±0.17 1.34±0.05 1.54±0.06 0.27±0.10 4.19±0.04 -29.1,-15.0,+7.2 3.9±0.3 2±3 * - colour calculated from magnitudes drawn from the Tycho-2 catalogue (Høg et al. 2000). We assign a standard ±100K uncertainty to the Teff measurements and ±0.10 dex to the metallicities. π values come from van Leeuwen (2007) and all other Hipparcos parameters are taken from Perryman et al. (1997). Evolutionary bulk properties and spectrally measured indices were either computed in this work or taken from Jenkins et al. (2008), Jenkins et al. (2011b), and Murgas et al. (2013). [Fe/H] abundances, spectroscopic log g values, and rotational velocities were calculated using the procedures in Pavlenko et al. (2012) and taken from Ivanyuk et al. (2016). Figure 1. Positions of these stars on a colour magnitude diagram. The grey filled circles are nearby stars drawn from the Hipparcos catalogue, the filled squares are the full sample of CHEPS targets, the filled stars are the positions of the stars discussed in this work, and the solid curve marks the position of the main sequence. In the inset we show an HR-diagram with the positions of the stars discussed here, where the Y2 evolutionary models for masses of 1.0 (solid), 1.1 (dashed), 1.2 (dot-dashed), and 1.3 (dot-dot-dashed) and metallicities of +0.2 dex are shown increasing towards higher luminosities and temperatures. The arrow shows the approximate direction of increasing mass. MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) considerable correlations to the probability densities of the model parameters. In Appendix B1 we show the MMSE power spectra for our sample of stars and it is clear that a number of deep troughs are present in the data, yet some sets show no sig- nificant power troughs over the frequency space searched. We thus applied the delayed-rejection adaptive-Metropolis algorithm (DRAM; Haario et al. 2006) together with tem- pered Markov chains when searching for solutions to our Keplerian models (see Tuomi 2014; Tuomi et al. 2014) and the simpler adaptive-Metropolis algorithm (Haario et al. 2001) when obtaining estimates for the model parameters. This method has previously been applied in Tuomi et al. (2013), Jenkins et al. (2013b), Jenkins et al. (2013c), and Jenkins & Tuomi (2014), for example. The vertical dashed lines in the MMSE periodograms mark the positions of these detected signals. The DRAM algorithm works by using a sequence of pro- posal densities that are each narrower than the last. Here "narrower" is to be understood as a multivariate Gaussian proposal density, on which the adaptive-Metropolis algo- rithm is based, that has a smaller variance for at least one of the parameters in the parameter vector. In short, if a value proposed by drawing it from an initial proposal density is re- jected, we continue by modifying the proposal density with respect to the period parameter(s) by multiplying it with a factor of 0.1 such that another value is proposed from a nar- rower area surrounding the current state of the chain. This enables us to visit the areas of high probability in the pe- riod space repeatedly and reliably and to see which periods correspond to the highest values of the posterior probability density. We applied a statistical model that contains reference velocities of each instrument, a linear trend, Keplerian sig- nals, and excess white noise. By simplifying the statistical model in Tuomi et al. (2014) by removing the intrinsic cor- relations that we do not expect to play a significant role due to the low number of measurements and the (relatively) high amplitude variations in the data, the model can be written as mi,l = γl + γti + fk(ti) + ǫi,l (1) l + σ2 where mi,l is the ith measurement made by the lth telescope/instrument, γl is the systemic velocity offset for each instrument, γ represents the linear trend, fk is the superposition of k Keplerian signals at time ti, and ǫi,l is a Gaussian random variable with zero mean and a vari- ance of σ2 i , where σl is a free parameter in our anal- yses that represents the stellar jitter noise and σi is the measurement uncertainty. We use prior probability densi- ties as described in Tuomi (2012) but apply an informa- tive prior density for the orbital eccentricities such that π(e) ∝ N (0, 0.32) that penalises, but does not exclude, eccentricities close to unity (Anglada-Escud´e et al. 2013; Tuomi & Anglada-Escud´e 2013). Therefore, given the pre- vious tests performed using this model, in particular using high-precision HARPS data, we expect this model to repre- sent a sufficiently accurate description of the velocities anal- ysed in the current work. The good agreement between the parameters published for the stars we discuss that overlap MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 5 Figure 2. Phase folded CORALIE (blue) and HARPS (red) ve- locities for HD9174. The solid curve is the best fit Keplerian model. with previous work, is testament to the model's applicabil- ity. Posterior densities for the periods, semi-amplitudes, and eccentricities for all signals are shown in Appen- dices C1, C2, and C3, and below we discuss each of the sys- tems independently. Note that all the signal fits are shown phase folded to highlight the phase coverage we have ob- served. We did not show the posteriors for the residuals to any of the systems (more than a single planet model fit) un- less we detected a unique solution that relates to a second Doppler signal. 3.1 HD9174 HD9174 is classed as a G8 subgiant star in the Hipparcos catalogue (Perryman et al. 1997) since it has a distance from the main sequence (∆MV ) of 1.5 and a B − V colour of 0.76. The star is also extremely metal-rich, with an [Fe/H] of nearly +0.4 dex, indicating a high probability of hosting a giant planet. A signal with a semi-amplitude of 21 m s−1has been detected with a period of nearly 1200 days. The star is very chromospherically quiet and exhibits low rotational ve- locity, indicating it is an ideal subgiant to search for orbiting exoplanets using the radial velocity method, and hence we do not believe the signal is induced by activity features, and therefore conclude that HD9174 hosts an orbiting planet. In order to understand the significance of the detected signals we present here, we calculated log-Bayesian evidence ratios for each of the signals presented here based on the MCMC samples drawn from a mixture of prior and posterior densities, as discussed in Newton & Raftery (1994) (see Eqs. 15 & 16). This is a version of importance sampling that uses a mixed distribution to obtain a sampling distribution that has "heavier" tails than the posterior (see Nelson et al. 2016 for further discussion of this method). We note that all of these signals are so strong that they would pass essentially any meaningful significance test, from likelihood-ratio tests to tests applying any other information criteria. The log-Bayesian evidence ratio for the signal in the data of HD9174 was found to be 42.1 for the 1-planet model. The signal is also readily apparent in the MMSE pe- riodogram. No secondary signal was detected. Considering 6 J.S. Jenkins et al. Figure 3. Phase folded CORALIE (blue), HARPS (red), and MIKE (green) velocities for the long period signal detected in the HD48265 velocities. The solid curve represents the best fit Keplerian model to the data. Figure 4. Phase folded CORALIE (blue) and HARPS (red) ve- locities for HD68402. The solid curve is the best fit Keplerian model. we set the threshold boundary for a statistically significant signal to be at the level of 104, or 9.21 in log-Bayesian units, it is clear that this signal is very significant. Our best fit to the data yields a non-circular eccentricity, only at the level of around 0.12, and with a stellar mass commensurate with that of the Sun, the orbiting planet has a minimum mass of 1.11 MJ. The phase folded velocities and model fit are shown in Fig. 2 3.2 HD48265 HD48265 is classed in the Hipparcos catalogue as a G5IV/V star, however we find a ∆MV of 1.9, therefore this star is a subgiant. Again, it is extremely metal-rich, towards the top end of the metallicity scale, since it's [Fe/H] is found to be +0.4 dex. A planetary companion to this star was previ- ously published in Minniti et al. (2009) and an update to the planet's orbital parameters was published in Jenkins et al. (2009). Here we report our latest orbital solution for this system, including more HARPS velocities and with the ad- dition of CORALIE and MIKE data. We found a signal with a period of 780 days and with a semi-amplitude of 28 m s−1(Fig. 3) in the radial velocities of HD48265. The log-Bayesian evidence for this signal is 103.1, well above the significance threshold. Although there is a trough in the MMSE close to this period when compared to the surrounding parameter space, it is significantly lower than the noise floor at shorter periods, in particular around a period of 20 days (deepest trough), therefore the MMSE periodogram can not be used to confirm the existence of this signal. We studied this 20 day trough to look for evidence of a signal here but nothing was clear. In fact, this trough was found to be dependent on the noise properties of the data, since when the jitter parameter was considered in the periodogram analysis the evidence pointed towards a period of ∼40 days, close to twice the period, indicating it is an artifact of the interference pattern from the window function beating with the real signal in the data. The evolved nature of the star ensures that it is an in- active and slowly rotating star and hence it is unlikely that stellar activity is the source of these signals. The minimum mass of the planet is found to be 1.47 MJ and a non-zero eccentricity was found for the signal. We note that a signifi- cant linear trend was also found that possibly indicates more companions that await discovery in this system, particularly at longer orbital periods. The method also indicated that a shorter period signal may be present, with a period close to 60 days, yet the current data does not allow us to confirm this as a genuine second planet since the signal disappears when we introduce the linear activity correlation parame- ters in the analysis. Also, this signal could be an alias of the detected planetary signal. The planetary parameters we find here are generally in good agreement with those published in Minniti et al. (2009) and Jenkins et al. (2009), however the period we quote is significantly larger than that found by Jenkins et al. by ∼80 days. The differences in the periods are attributed to the lower number of high precision HARPS data in that work, which was causing the fitting algorithm to weight heavily towards those data points, even though they were much fewer compared to the MIKE data. This had the effect of significantly increasing the precision of the fit compared to Minniti et al., but in the presence of a linear trend, it also skewed the orbital period to lower values. All other param- eters are in excellent agreement within the uncertainties. 3.3 HD68402 The star HD68402 is classed as G5IV/V, though since we find a ∆MV of around 0.1 magnitudes, we believe the star to be a dwarf. The metallicity of HD68402 is found to be +0.29 dex. A signal with a semi-amplitude of over 50 m s−1was found at a period (∼1100 days) similar to that in the HD9174 data. The MMSE shows two long period troughs for this data, with the detected signal found to be the second trough behind a slightly stronger trough close to 3000 days. The signal was found to have an eccentricity of 0.03, but to within the limits it can be considered as circular. Given the mass of HD68402 is 1.12 M⊙ , we compute a minimum mass of just over 3 MJ for the planet. The phase folded velocities for the planetary signal are shown in Fig. 4. Since the log-Bayesian evidence is 49.4, strongly confirming the existence of a signal, and it was also found in the MMSE MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 7 Figure 5. Phase folded CORALIE (blue) and HARPS (red) ve- locities for HD72892. The solid curve is the best fit Keplerian model. Figure 6. Phase folded CORALIE (blue) and HARPS (red) ve- locities for HD128356. The solid curve is the best fit Keplerian model. analysis, and by a manual fitting approach, the solution is significantly well constrained, even though there is a small gap in the phase folded curve. 3.4 HD72892 This G5V star is located at a distance of 73 pc from the Sun and has a metallicity of +0.25 dex. The star is also very inactive (logR′ HK = -5.02) and a slow rotator (vsini = 2.5 km s−1) representing an excellent target to search for planets. We have detected a signal with a period of nearly 40 days and semi-amplitude of 320 m s−1. The signal has a log Bayesian evidence value of 903.0, confirming the signal at very high significance. Given the S/N ratio between the signal amplitude and the HARPS and CORALIE uncertain- ties, we fully expected a large evidence ratio to confirm the nature of the signal. The signal is also clearly apparent in the MMSE periodogram as the strongest trough, adding to its reality. We find a mass for the star of 1.02 M⊙ , leading to a planetary minimum mass of 5.5 MJ. This super-Jupiter also has appreciable eccentricity, at the level of 0.4, and the final Keplerian model to the phase folded velocities are shown in Fig. 5. We note that the solution gives rise to a transit probability for this star of 1.6%, a relatively high likelihood of transit for such a planet-star separation. 3.5 HD128356 HD128356 is the coolest star we have included in the CHEPS sample and is classed as a main sequence star by Hipparcos (K3V). We find the star to have a [Fe/H] of almost +0.2 dex, and with a ∆MV of 0.55, it may be a subgiant star, or at least in the process of evolving onto the subgiant branch. Using our Bayesian approach we detected a signal with a semi-amplitude of 37 m s−1and period approaching 300 days that had a log-Bayesian evidence ratio of 144.5. The star is found to be a very slow rotator, having a vsini of only 1.3±0.2 km s−1, and with a low chromospheric activity of logR′ HK of -4.8. We note that this activity level is signifi- cantly lower than the one reported in Jenkins et al. (2011b), due to an updated B − V colour used here. The colour used MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) in Jenkins et al. was drawn from the Hipparcos catalogue (B − V = 0.685), yet the Tycho-2 catalogue magnitudes (Høg et al. 2000) give a colour > 1, agreeing with what is expected for a mid-K star. Even if the star was moderately active, we would still expect the jitter to be low since mid-K type stars are not as Doppler−noisy as earlier type stars for a given activity level (e.g. Isaacson & Fischer 2010). This, combined with the very slow rotation of the star, indicates that it is likely a signal with a peak-to-peak amplitude of nearly 80 m s−1is not caused by modulated activity effects, especially with a period close to 300 days and eccentricity of 0.8. The signal detected in our MCMC analysis is also clearly apparent in the MMSE, being the deepest trough, despite the high eccentricity. However, an additional trough at a much longer period is also approaching a similar level of significance. There is also no apparent correlations with the activity indicators, as discussed in the next section, nor are there any detected periods in the activity measurements. Given the multi-method signal detection and lack of activ- ity correlations, we can confidently conclude that the signal we detected has a Doppler origin, and since the mass of HD128356 was found to be around 0.65 M⊙ , the measured minimum mass for the planet is 0.9 MJ. 3.6 HD143361 The star HD143361 was previously shown to have a planet with a period of 1057 days (Minniti et al. 2009; Jenkins et al. 2009) and we have been conducting further reconnaissance to search for additional companions and to better constrain the orbital characteristics of the previously detected planet. The host star is a chromospherically quiet (logR′ HK = -5.12 dex) and metal-rich ([Fe/H] = +0.22 dex) G6V star, located at a distance of 66 pc. Our Bayesian search found a signal with a period of 1046 days with a Bayesian evidence of 491.9, relating to a planet orbiting the star with a minimum mass of 3.5 MJ (Fig. 7). From the MMSE periodogram the signal is clearly detected, being one of the most significant periodogram de- tection's in our sample. The final parameters are in good agreement with those published in Minniti et al. and Jenk- 8 J.S. Jenkins et al. Figure 7. Phase folded CORALIE (blue), HARPS (red), and MIKE (green) velocities for HD143361. The solid curve is the best fit Keplerian model. ins et al. The orbital period found here is lower by 40 days (∼4%) compared to that published in Minniti et al. but only lower by 11 days (∼1%) to that published in Jenkins et al., and both are in agreement within the quoted uncertain- ties, which are a factor of 28.1 and 6.3 lower here than in those previous two works, respectively. Although in agree- ment within the quoted uncertainties, our semi-amplitude is higher than those published in the previous two works, by 9.1 and 7.1 m s−1, respectively. No strong evidence for a second companion was found in this system with the current data set. 3.7 HD147873 The star HD147873 is the earliest type star in this sample of planet-hosts and is reported as a G1V star in the Hipparcos catalogue. Given its distance of 105 pc, the star is a little brighter than 8 magnitudes in V . The star also appears to have a solar metallicity ([Fe/H] = -0.03 dex), is extremely inactive (logR′ HK = -5.27 dex), and rotates at the level of nearly 6 km s−1. We find a Y2 evolutionary track mass for HD147873 of 1.38 M⊙ . The Bayesian search for signals in the Doppler data for this star detected two strong periodic signals with semi- amplitudes of 170 and 50 m s−1for HD147873b and c re- spectively. The periods of the signals were found to be at 117 days for the stronger signal and 492 days for the weaker of the two signals. The log-Bayesian evidences we found for these signals were 1131.5 and 145.2. The MMSE peri- odogram also detected both these signals rather easily; the second becoming detectable in the residuals of the data once the first signal was removed, as shown in Appendix B1. We find planetary minimum masses of 5.1 and 2.3 MJ for the short and longer period planets, respectively. Both Keplerian fits to the data are shown in the upper and middle plots in Fig. 8. The inner planet is also only one of two in this sam- ple that has a transit probability of over 2%, a value that encourages the search for transits from intermediate period planets. Given we have discovered two giant planets with a semimajor axis difference of only 0.84 AU between them, we decided to test if the system architecture was dynami- Figure 8. Phase folded CORALIE (blue), HARPS (red), and MIKE (green) velocities for HD147873 for the short (upper panel) and long (lower panel) period signals. The solid curves represent the best fit Keplerian models to the data. cally stable. We ran Gragg-Burlich-Stoer integrations in the Systemic Console (Meschiari et al. 2009) over a period of 10 Myrs to study the evolution of the orbits of both planets. We find the eccentricity of the orbits librate with a period of around 12000 years but the system itself remains dynam- ically stable across this timespan. Systems with multiple gi- ant planets are interesting laboratories for dynamical stud- ies and this system may warrant further detailed dynamical study, especially if more massive companions are discovered with the addition of more data. 3.8 HD152079 HD152079 is classed as a G6 main sequence star in the Hipparcos catalogue and our previous work found it to be inactive (logR′ HK=-4.99 dex) and metal-rich (+0.16 dex in [Fe/H]), which may explain the 0.5 magnitude ∆MV . We found the mass of the star to be 1.1 M⊙ . This is also one of the stars in this sample with a previously announced planet candidate detected in orbit (Arriagada et al. 2010). A signal with a period of 2900 days and semi-amplitude of 31 m s−1was detected in the Doppler data of HD152079. The log-Bayesian evidence ratio was found to be 99.1, highly significant, and the signal was found to have an eccentric- ity over 0.5. It is likely for this data set that the moder- ate eccentricity of the signal is hampering its detection in MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 9 Figure 9. Phase folded CORALIE (blue), HARPS (red), and MIKE (green) velocities for HD152079. The solid curve is the best fit Keplerian model. Figure 10. Phase folded CORALIE (blue), HARPS (red), and MIKE (green) velocities for HD154672. The solid curve is the best fit Keplerian model. the MMSE periodogram. In addition, there is the presence of a linear trend in the data that indicates there is a long period secondary companion to this star, and since linear trends are not considered in the MMSE model, the interfer- ence here could also be confusing the algorithm. Yet there is a fairly strong trough showing at a period of ∼1400 days, which is close to half the Bayesian detected signal, and could be related to the Doppler signal, or an additional compan- ion that is at a 2:1 resonance site, which could also explain the eccentric shape of the one planet signal (Marcy et al. 2001; Anglada-Escud´e et al. 2010). In any case, we found the minimum mass of HD152079b to be 2.2 MJ and the Ke- plerian model fit is shown in Fig. 9. These values are in good agreement with those presented in Arriagada et al., except the precision quoted here is much higher. For in- stance, the period of 2097±930 days quoted in their work has been constrained to 2899±52 days here, a factor of 18 increase in precision and pushing the planet's orbit upwards by nearly 900 days. This precision increase is also mirrored directly in the semi-amplitude precision, lowering it from 58±18 m s−1to 31.3±1.1 m s−1. 3.9 HD154672 This star has a Hipparcos classification of G3IV, confirmed by our measurement of 0.94 magnitudes from the main sequence. Part of the elevation from the main sequence can also be explained by the metallicity enrichment of 0.11 dex. The star is also a slow rotator, having a vsini of 2.2 km s−1and was found to be very chromospherically inac- tive (logR′ HK= -5.12 dex). The position on the HR-diagram gives rise to a mass of 1.08 M⊙ . A signal with a period of 164 days and semi-amplitude of 176 m s−1was found in the Doppler timeseries of HD154672, with a log-Bayesian evidence ratio of 1709.2, the most significant signal in this data set. The signal is also clearly apparent in the MMSE periodogram, the period trough being significantly stronger than any other periods across the parameter space. The eccentricity of the signal was found to be 0.6, giving rise to a planet with a minimum mass of nearly 5 MJ. The values we find are in good agree- ment with the values previously published for this planet MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) Figure 11. Phase folded CORALIE (blue) and HARPS (red) velocities for HD165155. The solid curve is the best fit Keplerian model. in L´opez-Morales et al. (2008), with the period agreeing to within one hour and the minimum mass being slightly lower here by only 0.23 MJ, but well within the 1σ uncertainties. Given the inclusion of higher quality data in this analysis, we find the jitter for this star to be 2 m s−1, a factor two lower than that quoted in Lopez-Morales et al., demonstrat- ing that a significant fraction of their jitter was instrumental noise. The model fit is shown in Fig. 10. Our search for additional planets in the combined data sets did not yield any positive results, therefore no firm evidence exists for any additional companions in this sys- tem. If the eccentricity from this planet is genuine and not due to the super-position of mixed signals from other giant planets in resonant orbits (see Anglada-Escud´e et al. 2010; Wittenmyer et al. 2012), then the transit probability for this object is found to be the highest in the current sample of intermediate and long period planets, at 2.5%. 3.10 HD165155 The Hipparcos catalogue classifies HD165155 as a G8 main sequence star, however with a elevation above the main se- quence of 1.4, this star can be considered as a subgiant. The 10 J.S. Jenkins et al. Figure 12. Phase folded CORALIE (blue), HARPS (red), and MIKE (green) velocities for HD224538. The solid curve is the best fit Keplerian model. star is located at a distance of 65 pc, and from spectroscopy we have found a logR′ HK activity index of -5.18 dex, a rota- tional velocity of 1.5 km s−1, and a [Fe/H] metallicity index of 0.09 dex. Comparison to Y2 evolutionary models yield a mass for the star of 1.02 M⊙ . A signal has been detected in the radial velocity data for HD165155 with a period of 435 days and a semi-amplitude of 76 m s−1. The log-Bayesian evidence for the signal was found to be 168.9, securely above the significance threshold. The eccentricity was found to be 0.20 and therefore the fi- nal minimum mass of the companion is calculated as 2.9 MJ (Fig. 11). A two-planet model search produced statistically significant evidence for a second signal in the data, however given the limited number of measurements we could not con- firm a unique secondary signal at this time. No statistically significant troughs were detected in the MMSE periodogram for this star, which may be due to the presence of a sec- ondary signal that is interfering with the primary signal. Indeed, the inclusion of a strong linear trend was necessary to constrain this signal, and since linear trends are not in- cluded in the MMSE modeling approach, this trend is likely the reason why the MMSE approach failed to detect this signal. 3.11 HD224538 The main Hipparcos catalogue lists HD224538 as a F9 dwarf or subgiant located at a distance of 78 pc. With a calculated ∆MV of 0.63 and a high overabundance of metals in the star ([Fe/H]=+0.27 dex), the possibility remains that this star is either on the main sequence or crossing into the subgiant branch. The star is both a slow rotator (vsini = 3.9 km s−1) and chromospherically inactive (logR′ HK= -4.99 dex). From comparisons to Y2 isomass tracks on a HR-diagram we found a mass of 1.34 M⊙ for HD224538. Our Bayesian algorithm found a signal with a period of 1189 days, a semi-amplitude of 107 m s−1, and an eccentric- ity of 0.46, shown in Fig. 12. The log-Bayesian evidence ra- tio for the signal was found to be highly significant at 391.0. The MMSE periodogram also clearly detected this signal. Therefore a planet with a minimum mass of 6.0 MJ is found to be orbiting this star. This is reminiscent of the gas giant Figure 13. The four plots from top to bottom show the linear correlations between the radial velocities and the bisector span velocities, the S-indices, the Hα indices, and the He I indices for HD128356, respectively, where CORALIE data is represented by open rings and HARPS data by filled circles. The solid lines are the best fit linear trends to the data. planet 14 Her b that has a broadly similar mass, period, and eccentricity (Butler et al. 2003) and such planets appear to be rare. Even though 14 Her is an early K-dwarf star it does have a super solar metallicity (+0.43±0.08 dex) similar to HD224538, likely necessary to form such high-mass planets. No additional statistically significant signals were found in the current data set. 3.12 Line Modulation Tests Although these stars are very inactive and slowly rotating and the Doppler signals we have detected are generally very large compared to the uncertainties (most are significantly larger than 20 m s−1), it is useful to rule out line modulations that could originate from stellar activity as the source of the variations. The activity parameters employed are the calciumiiHK line doublet, the bisector span (BIS), the CCF FWHM, the Hα line, and the He I D3 line. These indices were selected since they have previously been shown to be good tracers of stellar magnetic activity, and/or spectral line modulations (e.g. Queloz et al. 2001; Robertson et al. 2014; Santos et al. 2010). In Fig. 13 we show four of the tests we have carried out to rule out these modulations as the source of the detected radial velocity shifts for the star HD128356, originally believed to be the most active star in the sample due to the erroneous B − V colour. We note that we do not show the CCF FWHM test for this star since there is large variations with a few outliers, but no correlation exists. In the upper plot of Fig. 13 we show how the BIS values vary as a function of the radial velocity datasets. The BIS values for HARPS were taken from the HARPS-DRS and measured following the method explained in Queloz et al. (2001). The CORALIE BIS values were calculated using a similar procedure. No significant correlation between the ra- dial velocities and the BIS measurements are found and we highlight this by showing the best fit linear trend to the MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) data. The unweighted Pearson rank correlation coefficient has a value of 0.23, signifying a weak correlation, however when the correlation is weighted by the measurement uncer- tainties on the radial velocity and BIS values, the coefficient drops to 0.11, or no evidence at all for any correlation. We also searched for a correlation between the chro- mospheric activity S-indices and the velocities as a second useful discriminant that activity is not the source of the observed variations. The measurement of these S-indices for HARPS was briefly discussed in Jenkins et al. (2013b) and therefore here we only discuss the CORALIE activ- ity measurement method in Appendix D. In any case the method for both is similar, except for HARPS we use the ex- tracted 1D order-merged spectrum, whereas for CORALIE spectra we perform the calculations using the extracted 2D order-per-order spectrum, similar to the method discussed in Jenkins et al. (2006). The second plot in Fig. 13 shows these chromospheric activity S-indices as a function of the radial velocity mea- surements and no apparent correlation is found. The best unweighted linear fit is shown by the solid line and confirms the lack of any correlation between the two parameters. The correlation coefficient also confirms this since an unweighted r coefficient of -0.09, similar to the weighted BIS, is not sta- tistically significant, dropping even lower when considering the weights. The lower two plots in the figure show the linear corre- lations against the measured Hα and He I D3 activity indi- cators, respectively. These indices were calculated following the methods discussed in Santos et al. (2010). For both of these indices, no significant correlation is found when com- bining the CORALIE and HARPS data. Some moderate correlation between the He I index and the velocities is seen, with an unweighted r correlation coefficient of -0.64 for the HARPS only measurements, decreasing to -0.39 when the CORALIE measurements are added. Judging by the lower panel in the figure, no striking correlation is apparent, given what would be expected for this level of correlation, and once the measurement uncertainties are included to weight the correlation coefficient, the value drops significantly to be in agreement with zero correlation. In fact, we can see that the majority of the data are uncorrelated, from radial veloc- ities between -25 - +55 m s−1, with only a few offset data points clustered around -40 m s−1driving the correlation. As an aside, relationships if we apply the in Saar & Donahue (1997) and Hatzes (2002) to calculate the spot coverage expected for a star with the rotational period of HD128356, in order to produce a radial velocity ampli- tude in agreement with that observed here, then ∼5% of disk spot coverage is required, which would likely exhibit as photometric variations that are not observed (see below). Although the activity indicators for the other stars re- ported in this work show no evidence for any strong linear correlations, measured by the Pearson Rank correlation co- efficient, against the radial velocities, we report the moder- ately correlated data sets (0.5 > r > 0.75). For HD48265 the HARPS BIS values correlate with the radial velocities with a r value of 0.59±0.25, indicating some moderate corre- lation between the two parameters. We also note that both the Hα and He I indices have values of 0.47 and -0.41, re- spectively, yet there are large parts of parameter space that are under-sampled by including only the HARPS data alone. MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 11 When adding in the CORALIE measurements we find these values decrease to 0.22, 0.12, and -0.33 for the three quanti- ties respectively, with uncertainties of ±0.16, indicating that these correlations are not the source of the velocity signal for this star. The star HD68402 shows HARPS velocity correlations with the BIS and He I indices with r values of 0.79 and 0.52, respectively. We note that there are only five HARPS data points for this star so no result here can be deemed significant. Furthermore, once the CORALIE values are in- cluded we find values of 0.01 and 0.12 for these parameters respectively. When including the CORALIE measurements we find a moderate correlation appears between the veloc- ities and the CCF FWHM measurements (r = 0.52±0.23). Again there appears no significant correlations in the anal- ysis. Another star with a limited number of HARPS spectra (eight measurements) that give rise to an apparent moderate correlation between the radial velocities and activity indica- tors is HD72892. The HARPS CCF FWHM and He I mea- surements have Pearson rank correlation coefficients of 0.58 and 0.73, respectively, with uncertainties of ±0.38. When the CORALIE measurements are added to the HARPS data we find this correlation becomes insignificant, with values of only -0.47 and 0.10, respectively, and uncertainties of ±0.19. However, the Hα indices now exhibit a moderate correlation with the velocities (r = 0.57). The signal for this star has an amplitude of nearly 320 m s−1and a period of ∼40 days. Although 40 days is a plausible rotational period for this type of very inactive G5 dwarf star, the fact that it is so inactive indicates that such a large signal would be difficult to produce through spot rotation. In fact, if we calculate the spot coverage as above, then 20-25% of disk spot coverage is required, which can be ruled out based on the photometric stability and the low logR′ HK measurement. For HD152079 the HARPS Hα index correlates with the velocities with a correlation coefficient r of 0.66±0.24, although none of the the other indicators show any evidence for correlations, and when adding the CORALIE data, the correlation coefficient decreases to a value of only 0.47±0.17. We note that the variations in the measurements are only changing at the few ×10−3 level, from 0.203 to 0.208 in our HARPS Hα index. The star HD165155 shows a correlation between the velocities and the HARPS CCF FWHM with a value of - 0.66±0.23, although with a large spread. Addition of the CORALIE CCF FWHM decreases the value to 0.12±0.17, rendering this result insignificant. HD224538 shows moderate correlation between the ve- locities and the Hα indices at the level of 0.69±0.22 in the HARPS data, and at the level of 0.27±0.15 when the CORALIE values are included. Again the variation is only at the few ×10−3 level, which is likely to be insignificant. The periodogram analysis for each of the five activity indicators did not reveal any significant periods that could explain the detected signals in any of the stars considered here (see Appendix E1), however a few features do appear. For the star HD72892 there are emerging peaks in the peri- odograms of the BIS, FWHM, S and He I indices at periods between 11-13 days, and although this region is distinct from the detected planetary signal, these may be linked to the ro- tational period of the star, however there is a peak in the 12 J.S. Jenkins et al. window function at 22.5 days that could be giving rise to a peak at the first harmonic in these indices. For HD128356, the moderately active star, both the BIS and FWHM time- series show peaks that agree with a period around 1250 days that has no counterpart in the window function, meaning this could be a magnetic cycle, but it is far from the de- tected Doppler signal period. HD147873 does show a unique peak close to the lower period signal in the radial velocities in the He I indices with a period of around 120 days, yet the peak is not significant. The Hα indices show an emerg- ing peak with a period of ∼70 days as the strongest signal for HD165155 that could point to the rotation period for this star but there is a window function peak emerging at 63.5 days, that is likely unrelated to this peak, but is wor- thy of note. In any case, neither of these are related to the detected Doppler signal in the radial velocities. Finally, the star HD224538 shows evidence for two peaks in the peri- odograms of the BIS and Hα indices that are in good agree- ment with signals with periods of 20 days, which again could be a good candidate for the rotational period for this star, however the fifth strongest peak in the window function is found to be at 19 days, meaning there is a non-insignificant probability that this peak is being boosted by the sampling. 3.13 Photometric Analysis We decided to photometrically search for a secure rotational period for these stars by employing frequency analyses of the V -band All Sky Automated Survey (ASAS; Pojmanski 1997) photometric data. We have previously shown that such anal- yses can shed light on the rotational periods of planet-host stars and/or short period and long period magnetic cycles (e.g. Anglada-Escud´e et al. 2013; Jenkins & Tuomi 2014). We tend to focus on the best quality data, ASAS grade A or B using the smallest ASAS apertures that are best for point sources, and typical baselines cover ∼9 years at a sampling cadence of ∼3 days. Out of all the 11 planet-hosts considered in this work, six show evidence for a significant rotational period or long period magnetic cycle in the photometry, and these are summarised below, with particular focus paid to HD165155. The six stars showing evidence for a photometric signal in the ASAS timeseries are HD68402, HD147873, HD152079, HD154672, HD165155, and HD224538, and the Lomb- Scargle periodograms for these six stars are shown in Ap- pendix F1. We do not show the periodograms for the re- maining six stars since they exhibit no significant frequency peaks. The periodogram for HD68402 shows two strong peaks emerging at periods of 312 days and 2000 days. Nei- ther of these signals reside at periods close to the detected Doppler signal in the radial velocities, however their strength suggests there may be some long term magnetic cycle at play within this star. The stars HD147873, HD152079, HD154672, and HD224538 all show evidence for long period modulated spot activity, with periods at the extremities of the data time- series and periodogram sampling ∼5000–10000 days. These could be real long term spot cycles or they could be sam- pling features to due to the limited baselines of the data sets. However, none of these features appear to coincide with the detected radial velocity signal periods, or harmonics there- of. HD154672 has a velocity signal detected at just over 160 days, far from any long period magnetic cycle, whereas the signal in the HD224538 velocities has a period of a few thousand days, which could agree with any potential pho- tometric signal in the ASAS data that is not due to the limited data baseline. However, our analysis never indicated any correlations were evident between the radial velocities and the activity indicators for this star, and its inactive na- ture, along with the strength of the radial velocity signal (K = 110 m s−1), would make an activity origin unlikely for a star of this type. The evidence from these analyses points to the origin of the detected signals as being due the gravitational influence of orbiting planets. The star HD152079 has a detected signal in the veloci- ties with a period of a few thousand days, which is approach- ing the regime where a long period magnetic cycle could be present due to the ASAS photometric periodogram, yet the amplitude of this signal is a little over 30 m s−1for this very inactive star. The structure of the long period signals in the power spectrum of these stars are very similar, which argues that the frequencies emerge due to the sampling baseline. A further secondary peak exists in the photometric peri- odogram for this star at ∼830 days. Since this is too short to be associated with the signal in the radial velocities, it is not the origin of that signal but could be a possible sampled magnetic cycle. In any case, the nature of the radial velocity signal is likely Doppler and from an orbiting planetary mass candidate. We note that for HD147873 and HD224538, additional peaks arise in the periodograms at periods that could be in the range of rotational periods for stars with these types of rotational velocities and stellar radii, or could relate to additional magnetic cycles. For HD147873, there is a strong peak at a period of 29.5 days, very close to the lunar cy- cle, and since this period was found to arise in other ASAS timeseries, it is likely this is a sampling alias and not the star's rotational period. For HD224538, the next strongest peak is located at 385 days, with again the 29.5 day period being detected. The 385 day peak is within a small cluster of peaks that surround the Earth's orbital period, therefore it is likely this is another sampling alias. Hence, it is unlikely that we have made a significant detection of the rotational period for any of these stars, with only tentative detections of long period magnetic cycles. Finally, we discuss the photometric analysis for the star HD165155 independently, since there is an indication of a peak in the periodogram that is close to the period of the detected signal in the RV measurements. Given that the sig- nal is rather strong, it is unlikely that activity is the source of the signal at this type of period. We also note that the orbital separation is too large to produce star-planet inter- actions that could cause any photometric signal. From the ASAS periodogram in Appendix F1 we can see that again a long period signal emerges, but after this signal, there are two fairly strong peaks with periods of 454 and 344 days. The 454 day signal is the second strongest after the long period peak and it closely matches the period of the sig- nal in the radial velocities at 452 days, indicating the signal could arise from activity or pulsations. As mentioned above, no similar periodicities were found in the activity indicators and since the Hipparcos photometry for this star only con- sists of 67 measurements, with a scatter in the data of 0.019 magnitudes, no significant periodicity was found in this data MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) either. We also note that by removing the long period trend with periods of 10000 days or more removes the signal at 454 days, signifying it is linked to this long period trend and therefore likely not a true magnetic cycle that could induce such a radial velocity signal as we observe. There exists a small possibility that the detected radial velocity signal is not of Doppler origin and is due to line asymmetries from stellar activity on this subgiant star, even though the existence of this photometric period is difficult to causally connect to the origin of the radial velocity signal without corroborating periodicities in the spectral activity indicators. Without garnering more data, and since the de- tected photometric peak in the periodogram could be an alias that is associated with a longer period signal or the window function of the data, we still consider the radial ve- locity signal as due to an orbiting companion. If, on the other hand, the signal in the velocities is genuinely of astro- physical origin, this data set would serve as a warning when trying to understand the origin of signals in radial velocity timeseries of subgiant stars, even when the signal amplitude is relatively large, and there are no correlations or periodic- ities in the spectral activity indicators. Thorough searches of existing photometric data should always be performed, where possible, to help to confirm the reality of proposed planetary systems. 4 PLANET POPULATION DISTRIBUTIONS The high metallicity selection bias in our program means we are generally targeting gas giant planets. The working hy- pothesis being that if such planets are formed through core accretion processes, then large cores can form quickly due to the enrichment of the proto-planetary disk, which gives the planetesimals sufficient time to accrete gaseous material to reach large masses after they cross the critical core mass limit of around 10 M⊕(Mizuno 1980). 4.1 Mass Function The observed mass distribution is a key observational con- straint for planet formation models, a constraint which has previously been fit by smooth power law trends with indices around -1 (e.g. Butler et al. 2006; Lopez & Jenkins 2012). In Fig. 14 we show the results of applying an exponential func- tion to the data, which we found to be more suited to the current distribution of exoplanets that have been detected over a wide range in stellar mass f (m) = A × emsin(i) + B (2) where f (m) is the model function that we fit to the data and A and B are the scaling parameter and offset of the model that are left as free parameters to be found following a maximum likelihood procedure with the following Gaussian likelihood function: L(Θ) = −0.5 × log(2π) −Xi log(σt,i) − Pi(yi − f (m)i)2 σ2 t,i (3) MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS σt,i = qσ2 p,i + σ2 e,i 13 (4) Here L is the likelihood function for parameters Θ, y is the observed data (mass function histogram points) for all i histogram points, and σp and σe are the Poisson uncer- tainties and any excess uncertainty for each of the values, respectively. This procedure finds the following values for the modeled parameters 0.89±0.03, 0.030+0.004 −0.003 , and 0.034+0.009 −0.002 for A, B, and σe, respectively. The uncertainties on these parameters were determined using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure in Python, employing the emcee numerical package (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2013). We used 100 walkers and ran chains of 10000 steps in length, with a 1000 step burn-in, which relates to a final chain length of 900,000 steps, with a final mean acceptance rate of 49%. The parameter values we measure are insensitive to small changes in the bin size used in the histogram, which we set to be 0.5MJ, a value that allows enough samples in most of the bins to reflect the smoothly varying distribution. At the right of Fig. 14 we show the parameter extent probed by the chains, where we used uniform priors for the parameters except the excess uncertainty, where we em- ployed a Jeffries prior where the probability is proportional to 1/σ. The distribution of the parameters are well confined to the region around the maximum likelihood value for each, showing the model we put forward is an acceptable repre- sentation of the current exoplanet mass function. We note that the A and B parameters follow Gaussian distributions, whereas the excess noise parameter is more like a skewed Gaussian or Poisson distribution, where the lower 1σ credi- bility limit is found to be close to the maximum likelihood value of 0.03. In any case, it seems that the mass function appears to be fairly well described by an exponential func- tion. 4.2 Mass-Metallicity Functions As Fig. 15 shows, we tested if there was any metallicity dependence in the mass function. In order to test this we split the sample into three metallicity bins, a high metallicity bin ([Fe/H]>+0.2 dex), an intermediate metallicity bin (- 0.16[Fe/H]<+0.2 dex), and a low metallicity bin ([Fe/H]<- 0.1 dex). These bin sizes allowed a useful number of samples in each bin to statistically probe the distributions. Metallicity splitting gives us probabilities (D-statistics) from two-tailed KS-tests of 8% (0.165) that the high metal- licity bin and the low metallicity bin are drawn from the same parent population, and 6% (0.161) that the interme- diate metallicity planet-hosts and the low metallicity planet hosts are also drawn from the same population. By com- bining the high metallicity bin and the low metallicity bin values and comparing those to the intermediate metallic- ity bin, the probability is essentially the same, only drop- ping the D-statistic by 0.01, with a probability of only 6% that the two populations are statistically similar. To perform this test we decided to remove the lowest mass planets from the metal-poor and intermediate-metallicity samples since Jenkins et al. (2013b) shows that there appears to be a cor- relation between the mass and metallicity in the low-mass regime. Therefore, we only consider planets with minimum masses above 0.0184 MJ as this is the lowest mass planet in the high metallicity sample, neglecting the exceptional case 14 J.S. Jenkins et al. Table 2. Orbital mechanics for all planetary systems described in this work. Parameter HD9174b HD48265b HD68402b HD72892b HD128356b HD143361b Orbital period P (days) Velocity amplitude K (m/s) Eccentricity e ω (rad) M0 (rad) m sin i(MJ ) Semimajor axis a (AU) γHARPS (m/s) γCORALIE (m/s) γMIKE (m/s) σHARPS (m/s) σCORALIE (m/s) σMIKE (m/s) γ [ms−1year−1 ] PT NObs ln B(k, k − 1) 1179±34 20.8±2.2 0.12±0.05 1.78±0.66 3.5±1.3 1.11±0.14 2.20±0.09 -7.2±1.4 -1.6±3.0 – 1.8±0.6 2.2±1.0 – – 0.3% 29 42.1 780.3±4.6 27.7±1.2 0.08±0.05 6.0±2.4 4.9±1.4 1.47±0.12 1.81±0.07 -1.5±1.6 -4.3±2.6 -3.5±1.4 6.0±0.6 2.7±1.1 2.8±0.8 – 0.5% 57 103.1 1103±33 54.7±5.3 0.03±0.06 0.3±2.3 6.0±2.2 3.07±0.35 2.18±0.09 -34.2±8.2 -10.6±4.6 – 1.7±0.9 2.0±1.0 – – 0.2% 20 49.4 39.475±0.004 318.4±4.5 0.423±0.006 6.010±0.014 2.714±0.010 5.45±0.37 0.228±0.008 -37.8±1.7 48.7±3.2 – 2.2±0.7 2.0±1.0 – – 1.6% 32 903.0 298.2±1.6 36.9±1.2 0.57±0.08 1.47±0.08 3.1±0.7 0.89±0.07 0.87±0.03 -0.1±1.9 9.4±2.7 – 3.9±0.7 2.1±1.0 – – 0.4% 60 144.5 1046.2±3.2 72.1±1.0 0.193±0.015 4.21±0.06 3.21±0.14 3.48±0.24 1.98±0.07 -1.2±0.8 3.4±2.2 -26.6±1.2 2.3±0.6 1.8±0.9 2.8±0.8 – 0.2% 80 491.9 Parameter HD147873b HD147873c HD152079b HD154672b HD165155b HD224538b Orbital period P (days) 116.596±0.023 491.54±0.79 Velocity amplitude K (m/s) Eccentricity e ω (rad) M0 (rad) m sin i(MJ ) Semimajor axis a (AU) γHARPS (m/s) γCORALIE (m/s) γMIKE (m/s) σHARPS (m/s) σCORALIE (m/s) σMIKE (m/s) γ [ms−1year−1 ] PT NObs ln B(k, k − 1) 171.5±1.2 0.207±0.013 1.40±0.05 1.65±0.07 5.14±0.34 0.522±0.018 59.0±1.2 5.4±2.2 37.6±3.1 2.6±0.7 1.9±0.9 2.4±1.0 2.94±0.68 2.3% 66 1131.5 47.9±1.7 0.23±0.03 0.73±0.20 3.09±0.20 2.30±0.18 1.36±0.05 – – – – – – – 0.7% – 145.2 2899±52 31.3±1.1 0.52±0.02 5.67±0.06 0.8±0.8 2.18±0.17 3.98±0.15 -37.9±7.0 -44.8±8.5 -13.6±6.8 1.5±0.6 2.0±1.0 2.7±0.8 1.72±0.47 0.1% 50 99.1 163.967±0.009 176.3±0.7 0.600±0.004 4.63±0.01 3.60±0.02 4.73±0.32 0.59±0.02 5.2±0.7 -44.6±2.0 28.2±1.2 2.1±0.5 2.2±1.0 3.6±0.7 – 2.5% 72 1709.2 434.5±2.1 75.8±3.0 0.20±0.03 3.7±0.2 0.9±0.8 2.89±0.23 1.13±0.04 -59.6±18.7 -87.7±20.1 – 5.8±0.6 3.7±1.2 – 4.00±1.19 0.4% 38 168.9 1189.1±5.1 107.0±2.4 0.464±0.022 0.40±0.03 0.3±0.3 5.97±0.42 2.28±0.08 -15.3±1.5 27.0±2.7 55.9±4.3 2.9±0.6 2.0±1.0 5.2±0.7 – 0.2% 50 391.0 The uncertainties on the m sin i and semimajor axis consider the uncertainties on our stellar mass estimate of 10%. The γ offset is the value after subtracting off the mean of the data set. The σ terms parameterise the excess noise in our model fits, aka jitter. The ln B(k,k-1) are generally the 1-planet models (e.g. B(1,0)) except for HD147873 which is a 2-planet model (B(2,1)). PT is each planet's transit probability. NObs are the total number of radial velocities per target star. Exponential Function 0 2 6 4 Msin(i) [MJ] 8 10 Figure 14. Normalised mass function distribution showing an exponential fit to the data for 444 exoplanet candidates (left). The asso- ciated uncertainties have been calculated assuming Poisson statistics. The right plot shows the parameter space contours and histograms (aka. a corner plot; Dan Foreman-Mackey et al. (2016). corner.py: corner.py v1.0.2. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.45906) constructed from the MCMC chains. The contours show the exponential scaling (A), the exponent (α), and the excess noise for 1, 2, and 3σ percentiles radiating outwards from the point of maximum probability of the distributions. The cross-hairs mark the values determined from the maximum likelihood best fit. The right-edge plots show the histogrammed distributions collapsed in only the x dimension, where the mean (solid) and 1σ (dashed) ranges are highlighted. 0.6 0.8 A 1.0 1.2 0.0 2 0.0 4 0.0 6 0.0 8 0.0 3 B 0.0 9 0.0 6 σe 0.1 2 of the planet orbiting Alpha Centauri B (Dumusque et al. 2012) that Hatzes (2013) and Rajpaul et al. (2015) claim may be attributed to other phenomena like stellar activity or sampling ghosts. In order to firm up these statistics we also ran the sam- ples through the Anderson-Darling (AD) test, which gener- ally tends to be more sensitive than the standard KS test since it gives more statistical weight to the tails of the dis- tribution. From these tests we found p-values of 2% and 5% for the comparison between the high metallicity and MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 ) m ( f d e s i l a m r o N 0.0 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 −0.05 −0.10 s l a u d i s e R B e σ 0.0 8 0.0 6 0.0 4 0.0 2 0.1 2 0.0 9 0.0 6 0.0 3 New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 15 (2012), and the overabundance of Jupiter's is not due to the enhanced formation of such planets as a function of metal- licity. We did not run the SWEET-Cat samples through the AD test since the results were shown to be very similar to the KS tests for the full sample. 4.3 Other Observational Properties Within the period-mass plane some features can be seen in the metallicities of exoplanet host stars. An examination of the left plot in Fig. 16 reveals that there is a broad mix of metallicities for the gas giant planets and the planets we publish here are located predominantly in the upper right quadrant of the plot, with only two having periods below 100 days. 4.3.1 Host Star Metallicities It appears that the lowest mass planets are found mostly on short period orbits, due to the inherent sensitivities of Doppler surveys, and they also appear to orbit metal-poor stars in general, hence the dominance of the black points to- wards the bottom left of the left hand panel in Fig. 16. This result was previously highlighted by Jenkins et al. (2013b), revealing a 'planet desert' for the most metal-rich stars, and subsequent confirmation has also been discussed in Marshall et al. (2014). The nature of this desert could be explained by core accretion theory whereby the lower den- sity discs have limited metals to form cores, whereas the high density discs can readily form high-mass cores that quickly grow to more massive objects, crossing the critical core mass limit and becoming gas giants. In fact, the metallic proper- ties of all planets with periods of less than 100 days appears to be different when we compare planets more massive or less massive than 0.1 MJ. In the plot, this is shown by the significantly higher fraction of red data points above a mass of 0.1 MJ compared to below that limit. More directly we can test the reality that the metallic- ity distribution for planets with periods of 100 days or less have a different metallicity distribution by again applying an AD test to the sample of known exoplanets. We chose to apply the sample to the homogeneous samples that we pre- viously cross-matched with the SWEET-Cat list. This test reveals a T-statistic of 8.54 when adjusted for all non-unique values, revealing a probability of 2×10−4 that these samples are statistically similar. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test yields a similar probability value (4×10−4) with a D-statistic of 0.375. The histograms of both populations are shown in the top plot of Fig. 17. Although the two histograms appear to show similar forms, the host stars that contain lower-mass planets currently has a flatter shape than the host stars con- taining higher-mass planets in this period space. Although the sample sizes are small, 48 objects in the low-mass pop- ulation for example, it does appear that the lowest-mass planets are drawn from a different metallicity sample when compared with the most massive planets, within the limits of the current data set. In the future with many more dis- coveries of very low-mass planets orbiting the nearest stars from Doppler surveys, since these represent the most pre- cise metallicities that can be measured, trends such as those discussed here can be tested at a higher level of statistical significance. Figure 15. The observed mass distribution split into three bins with different metallicity distributions and a binsize of 2 MJ. The solid black curve is for the most metal-rich planet-hosts, the dashed blue curve is for the intermediate metallicity stars, and the dot-dashed red curve is the distribution for all metal-poor stars. The metallicity cuts are shown in the key. low-metallicity samples, and between the intermediate and low-metallicity samples, respectively. This is in good agree- ment with the KS test results, indicating that there is a correlation between mass and metallicity, whereby metal- rich stars produce many more Jupiter-mass planets com- pared to super-Jupiters, but metal-poorer stars produce a higher fraction of super-Jupiters than Jupiters compared to the metal-rich population. However, the current sample of host star properties were not drawn from a homogeneous source and therefore the heterogeneous nature of the data could be influencing the results. To try to circumvent this problem, we decided to search for our sample of exoplanet-hosts in the SWEET-Cat cat- alogue (Santos et al. 2013). The SWEET-Cat is a project that plans to eventually contain all exoplanet host star prop- erties like Teff and metallicity that have been measured using high resolution spectroscopy in a homogeneous fashion. We were able to find 93% of our sample in the SWEET-Cat, but some of these were not measured homogeneously. From this sample we reran the KS tests and found probabilities of 9.1% that the high and low metallicity bins are drawn from the same parent population and 13.8% that the inter- mediate and low metallicity bins are drawn from the same distribution. A further step that was taken was to remove even more information but improve the homogeneity of the sample. We selected only those stars with a homogeneous flag of 1 in the SWEET-Cat, which means that the properties of these stars were measured using the same general methodology. This selection resulted in a 20% loss of information but still contained a total sample size of 358 planet-hosts, however the low metallicity bin only contained 64 stars, whereas the high and intermediate bins have sample sizes of 131 and 163 objects, respectively. The KS test probabilities are now sig- nificantly lower than the full sample, having values of 38.0% and 52.0% that the high and intermediate mass functions are statistically similar to that of the low metallicity bin. These tests likely show that currently there are no statisti- cally significant correlations between planetary mass and the metallicity of their host stars, as claimed by Mortier et al. MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) 16 J.S. Jenkins et al. 10.0 0.1 Dataset Lit New [Fe/H] 0.50 0.25 0.00 −0.25 −0.50 −0.75 10.0 0.1 Eccentricity 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 Dataset Lit New ] s e s s a M r e t i p u J [ i i n s M ] s e s s a M r e t i p u J [ i i n s M 10 Period [days] 1000 10 Period [days] 1000 Figure 16. Distribution of exoplanet metallicities (left) and eccentricities (right) within the period-mass plane. The small circles are the literature values and the large circles are our targets from this work. The colour scale to highlight the differing metallicities and eccentricities are shown at the right of both plots. to 100 days and those beyond 100 days. The binned his- togram for both samples is shown in the lower plot of Fig. 17, and although the distributions appear less discrepant than the mass cut in the top plot, there is an indication of a functional change in the metal-poor regime. The AD test of the metallicities from these samples returns a T-statistic of 7.62, leading to a probability of 4×10−4 that the sam- ples are similar. This time the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test reveals a slightly smaller probability of the null hypothe- sis, returning a value of 8×10−3 and a D-statistic of 0.223. Therefore we find that, in general, short period giant plan- ets have higher metallicities than those at longer periods, with a mean value of [Fe/H] of 0.16 dex for the sub-100 day planets and a value of 0.06 dex for the giant planets with or- bital periods longer than 100 days, as suggested by Sozzetti (2004) and Pinotti et al. (2005). Mordasini et al. (2012) constructed global population synthesis models of forming planets in a range of disc envi- ronments to search for expected correlations between plane- tary orbital parameters and bulk compositions against disc properties. They found that planets tend to migrate more in low-metallicity discs compared to more metal-rich discs be- cause the cores that form in the low-metallicity environment need to migrate more to undergo enough collisions to grow to the critical mass limit and transition from Type I migra- tion to the slower Type II migration. They suggest no clear correlation between semimajor axis, or orbital period, exists because the planets in low-metallicity discs also form further from the central star than in the high-metallicity discs, and so the increased efficiency of migration in the low-metallicity environment is compensated by the increased distance the planets need to travel inward towards the star. These modeling efforts tend to be at odds with the find- ings we have made unless certain conditions apply. If giant planets in metal-poor discs migrate more then we would ex- pect to see the opposite result, unless the planets start their MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) Figure 17. The binned histogram of sub-100 day period exo- planet host star metallicities detected by radial velocity programs is shown in the top plot. The solid histogram represents the gas giant planets, minimum masses above 0.1 MJ, and the dashed histogram is for host stars with planets below this threshold. The lower plot shows the binned histogram of gas giant planets (mini- mum masses above 0.1 MJ) for orbital periods of 100 days or less (solid histogram) and those with periods above 100 days (dashed histogram). All histograms have been normalised to the peak of the distribution to highlight their differences. Further to this, the high-mass planet sample may in- dicate there is a non-uniform metallicity distribution as a function of period. To test this we split the high-mass planet sample into two bins with orbital periods less than or equal ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● journeys very far out in the disc before arriving at their current locations. In addition, another scenario could be that the low-metallicity discs are dispersed faster than high- metallicity discs through photo-evaporation (Yasui et al. 2009; Ercolano & Clarke 2010). This effect is thought to be due to the lower optical depth of the disc allowing the UV and X-ray flux to pass deeper into the disc, dispersing the inner regions faster, meaning there is no remaining gas and dust for the planet to interact with, essentially halt- ing its migration earlier when compared to a planet migrat- ing through a metal-rich disc. Finally, in the Mordasini et al. model, they predominantly consider mostly inward mi- gration of cores, however recent work has shown that disc structure is important in defining the dominant torques that drive planet migration and in the inner discs that are heated by the intensity of the young star's radiation field, corota- tion torques dominate over the differential Linblad torques, leading to outward migration of the cores (Kretke & Lin 2012). Further to this, random walk motion too can be im- portant for migrating low-mass cores (Nelson & Papaloizou 2004; Laughlin et al. 2004; Nelson 2005) and dead-zones in the disk can subsequently halt the migration of forming low- mass cores (Balmforth & Korycansky 2001; Li et al. 2009; Yu et al. 2010). All of these processes could lead to the preservation of a period-metallicity relationship that favours short period planets predominantly being found orbiting more metal-rich stars and longer-period planets being found in more metal-poor environments. 4.4 Orbital Eccentricities In the right plot in Fig. 16 we show the same period- minimum mass plane, yet this time the colour scaling high- lights the eccentricity distribution. We can see that the ma- jority of the short period planets (P 610 days) are generally found to have circular orbits, a fact that can be attributed to the planets tidal interactions with the host star that tends to circularised their orbits. We also see that the majority of the low-mass planets are found on circular orbits too (black points), in comparison to the high-mass planets where a sig- nificant fraction of them have moderate-to-high eccentric- ities (red points). Note that there is also a selection bias towards the detection of higher eccentricities that depends on the quantity of radial velocity data points that describes a given signal (O'Toole et al. 2009), whilst high eccentricity also elevates the amplitude of a given Doppler signal, which can sometimes make them easier to detect. If we again split the planets up into two mass bins, where the low-mass planets have minimum masses of 60.1 MJ and the high mass bin comprises all planets with minimum masses above this limit, the eccentricity means and standard deviations of the two populations are 0.13 and 0.12 for the low-mass planet population and 0.25 and 0.21 for the high-mass planet sample. Taken at face value, the in- creased standard deviation for the higher mass sample tells us the spread in eccentricities in this mass regime is higher than for the lower mass planets. There is a strong bias here where the low-mass planet sample has a significantly lower mean orbital period, with a much higher fraction of planets orbiting close enough to the star to be quickly circularised through tidal dissipation of the orbits. Furthermore, there is a tendency to fix the eccentricity to zero when performing MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 17 Keplerian fits to radial velocity data, in order to remove this additional degree of freedom and the degeneracy with other parameters being fit at the same time. 5 SUMMARY We have used the CORALIE, HARPS and MIKE spectro- graphs to discover eight new giant planets orbiting seven super metal-rich stars, and a star of solar metallicity, along with updated orbits for four previously published plan- ets. We include radial velocity data prior- and post-2014 CORALIE upgrade and our Bayesian updating method re- turned a systematic offset of 19.2±4.8 m s−1between the two velocity sets for our stars. The new planets cover a wide area of the giant planet parameter space, having a range of masses, periods, and eccentricities, including a double planet system that was found orbiting the most massive star in our list, and a 14 Herculis b analogue that has a minimum mass of ∼5.5MJ, an orbital period of nearly 1200 days, and signif- icant eccentricity (e=0.46), adding another member to the sub-population of massive eccentric planets orbiting super metal-rich stars. We introduced our method for measuring the chromo- spheric S-index that is a measure of the magnetic activity of Sun-like stars using CORALIE spectra. These activities, along with bisector measurements, CCF FWHM's, Hα in- dices, HeI indices, and Hipparcos and ASAS photometry, were used to rule out the origin of the planetary Doppler signal as being due to line modulations from rotationally influenced star spot migration or other activity phenomena like chromospheric plage or stellar pulsations. We show that the mass function for planets is well de- scribed by an exponential function with a scaling parameter of 0.89±0.03 and an offset of 0.030+0.004 −0.003 . We confirm the lack of the lowest-mass planets orbiting metal-rich stars and we also find a period-metallicity correlation for giant planets. The population of planets with masses >0.1 MJ and orbital periods less than 100 days is found to be more metal-rich than the same mass planets with orbital periods greater than 100 days. The difference is significant at the 0.004% level and the mean difference is found to be 0.16 dex between the two populations. This result could be describing the forma- tion locations of planets in the early disks, with metal-rich disks forming planets in the inner regions and metal-poor disks forming planets further out in the disk, or that giant planets migrate more in metal-rich disks, due to a stronger torque interaction between the high surface density disk and the migrating planet. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the anonymous referee for providing a fair and helpful report. We are also thankful for the useful dis- cussions with Francois Menard and to Andres Jord´an for providing access to the CORALIE pipeline. JSJ acknowl- edges funding by Fondecyt through grants 1161218 and 3110004, partial support from CATA-Basal (PB06, Coni- cyt), the GEMINI-CONICYT FUND and from the Comit´e Mixto ESO-GOBIERNO DE CHILE, and from the Coni- cyt PIA Anillo ACT1120. MJ acknowledges financial sup- 18 J.S. Jenkins et al. port from Fondecyt project #3140607. DM is supported by the BASAL CATA Center for Astrophysics and Associated Technologies through grant PFB-06, by the Ministry for the Economy, Development, and Tourisms Programa Iniciativa Cientfica Milenio through grant IC120009, awarded to Mille- nium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS), and by FONDECYT Regular grant No. 1130196. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database and the VizieR catalogue access tool, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. REFERENCES Anglada-Escud´e G., L´opez-Morales M., Chambers J. E., 2010, ApJ, 709, 168 Anglada-Escud´e G., et al., 2013, A&A, 556, A126 Arriagada P., Butler R. P., Minniti D., L´opez-Morales M., Shect- man S. A., Adams F. C., Boss A. P., Chambers J. E., 2010, ApJ, 711, 1229 Bakos G. ´A., Csubry Z., Penev K., et al. 2012, preprint, (arXiv:1206.1391) Balmforth N. J., Korycansky D. G., 2001, MNRAS, 326, 833 Baranne A., et al., 1996, A&A, 119, 373 Brahm R., Jordan A., 2016, in prep Buchhave L. A., Latham D. W., 2015, preprint, (arXiv:1507.03557) Butler R. P., Marcy G. W., Williams E., McCarthy C., Dosanjh P., Vogt S. S., 1996, PASP, 108, 500 Butler R. P., Marcy G. W., Vogt S. S., Fischer D. A., Henry G. W., Laughlin G., Wright J. T., 2003, ApJ, 582, 455 Butler R. P., et al., 2006, ApJ, 646, 505 Dawson R. I., Fabrycky D. C., 2010, ApJ, 722, 937 Demarque P., Woo J.-H., Kim Y.-C., Yi S. K., 2004, ApJS, 155, 667 Dumusque X., et al., 2012, Nature, 491, 207 Ercolano B., Clarke C. J., 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2735 Fischer D. A., Valenti J., 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102 Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, PASP, 125, 306 Haario H., Saksman E., Tamminen J., 2001, Bernoulli, 7, 223 Haario H., Laine M., Mira A., Saksman E., 2006, Statistics and Computing, 16, 339 Hatzes A. P., 2002, Astronomische Nachrichten, 323, 392 Hatzes A. P., 2013, ApJ, 770, 133 Høg E., et al., 2000, A&A, 355, L27 Ida S., Lin D. N. C., 2004, ApJ, 604, 388 Isaacson H., Fischer D., 2010, ApJ, 725, 875 Ivanyuk O., Jenkins J., Pavlenko Y., Jones H., Pinfield D., 2016, MNRAS, submitted Jenkins J. S., Tuomi M., 2014, ApJ, 794, 110 Jenkins J. S., et al., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 163 Jenkins J. S., Jones H. R. A., Pavlenko Y., Pinfield D. J., Barnes J. R., Lyubchik Y., 2008, A&A, 485, 571 Jenkins J. S., et al., 2009, MNRAS, 398, 911 Jenkins J. S., et al., 2011a, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences. p. 2004, doi:10.1051/epjconf/20111602004 Jenkins J. S., et al., 2011b, A&A, 531, A8 Jenkins J. S., et al., 2013a, in European Physical Jour- nal Web of Conferences. p. 5001 (arXiv:0912.5325), doi:10.1051/epjconf/20134705001 Jenkins J. S., et al., 2013b, ApJ, 766, 67 Jenkins J. S., Tuomi M., Brasser R., Ivanyuk O., Murgas F., Jones H. R. A., Butler R. P., Tinney C. G., Marcy G. W., Carter B. D., Penny A. J., McCarthy C., Bailey J., 2006, MNRAS, 369, 249 Jones M. I., Jenkins J. S., Bluhm P., Rojo P., Melo C. H. F., 2014, A&A, 566, A113 Jones M. I., et al., 2016, A&A, 590, A38 Jord´an A., Brahm R., Bakos G. ´A., et al. 2014, AJ, 148, 29 Kretke K. A., Lin D. N. C., 2012, ApJ, 755, 74 Laughlin G., Steinacker A., Adams F. C., 2004, ApJ, 608, 489 Li H., Lubow S. H., Li S., Lin D. N. C., 2009, ApJL, 690, L52 Lo Curto G., et al., 2010, A&A, 512, A48 Lopez S., Jenkins J. S., 2012, ApJ, 756, 177 L´opez-Morales M., et al., 2008, AJ, 136, 1901 Marcy G. W., Butler R. P., 1996, in Proc. SPIE Vol. 2704, p. 46-49, The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) in the Optical Spectrum II, Stuart A. Kingsley; Guillermo A. Lemarchand; Eds.. pp 46–49 Marcy G. W., Butler R. P., Fischer D., Vogt S. S., Lissauer J. J., Rivera E. J., 2001, ApJ, 556, 296 Marsakov V. A., Shevelev Y. G., 1988, Bulletin d'Information du Centre de Donnees Stellaires, 35, 129 Marsh T. R., 1989, PASP, 101, 1032 Marshall J. P., Moro-Mart´ın A., Eiroa C., et al. 2014, preprint, (arXiv:1403.6186) Mayor M., Queloz D., 1995, Nature, 378, 355 Meschiari S., Wolf A. S., Rivera E., Laughlin G., Vogt S., Butler P., 2009, PASP, 121, 1016 Minniti D., Butler R. P., L´opez-Morales M., Shectman S. A., Adams F. C., Arriagada P., Boss A. P., Chambers J. E., 2009, ApJ, 693, 1424 Mizuno H., 1980, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 64, 544 Mordasini C., Alibert Y., Benz W., Klahr H., Henning T., 2012, preprint, (arXiv:1201.1036) Mortier A., Santos N. C., Sozzetti A., Mayor M., Latham D., Bonfils X., Udry S., 2012, A&A, 543, A45 Murgas F., Jenkins J. S., Rojo P., Jones H. R. A., Pinfield D. J., 2013, A&A, 552, A27 Nelson R. P., 2005, A&A, 443, 1067 Nelson R. P., Papaloizou J. C. B., 2004, MNRAS, 350, 849 Nelson B. E., Robertson P. M., Payne M. J., Pritchard S. M., Deck K. M., Ford E. B., Wright J. T., Isaacson H. T., 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2484 Newton M. A., Raftery A. E., 1994, JRSS.B, 56, 3 O'Toole S. J., Tinney C. G., Jones H. R. A., Butler R. P., Marcy G. W., Carter B., Bailey J., 2009, MNRAS, 392, 641 Pavlenko Y. V., Jenkins J. S., Jones H. R. A., Ivanyuk O., Pinfield D. J., 2012, MNRAS, p. 2643 Pepe F., Mayor M., Galland F., Naef D., Queloz D., Santos N. C., Udry S., Burnet M., 2002, A&A, 388, 632 Perryman M. A. C., Lindegren L., Kovalevsky J., et al. 1997, A&A, 323, L49 Pinotti R., Arany-Prado L., Lyra W., Porto de Mello G. F., 2005, MNRAS, 364, 29 Pojmanski G., 1997, Acta Astronomica, 47, 467 Queloz D., et al., 2001, A&A, 379, 279 Rajpaul V., Aigrain S., Osborne M. A., Reece S., Roberts S. J., 2015, preprint, (arXiv:1506.07304) Reffert S., Bergmann C., Quirrenbach A., Trifonov T., Kunstler A., 2015, A&A, 574, A116 Robertson P., Mahadevan S., Endl M., Roy A., 2014, Science, 345, 440 Saar S. H., Donahue R. A., 1997, ApJ, 485, 319 Santos N. C., Israelian G., Mayor M., 2004, A&A, 415, 1153 Santos N. C., Gomes da Silva J., Lovis C., Melo C., 2010, A&A, 2013c, ApJ, 771, 41 511, A54 Jenkins J. S., Yoma N. B., Rojo P., Mahu R., Wuth J., 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2253 Santos N. C., et al., 2013, A&A, 556, A150 Soto M. G., Jenkins J. S., Jones M. I., 2015, MNRAS, 451, 3131 MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 19 Figure A1. HARPS radial velocity timeseries of HD72673 with the mean subtracted off the data. The upper panel shows the full timeseries and the lower panel is a zoom in on the most densely observed epoch for this star. Sousa S. G., Santos N. C., Israelian G., Mayor M., Udry S., 2011, A&A, 533, A141 Sozzetti A., 2004, MNRAS, 354, 1194 Takeda G., Ford E. B., Sills A., Rasio F. A., Fischer D. A., Valenti J. A., 2007, ApJS, 168, 297 Tamuz O., et al., 2008, A&A, 480, L33 Tuomi M., 2012, A&A, 543, A52 Tuomi M., 2014, MNRAS, 440, L1 Tuomi M., Anglada-Escud´e G., 2013, A&A, 556, A111 Tuomi M., et al., 2013, A&A, 551, A79 Tuomi M., Jones H. R. A., Barnes J. R., Anglada-Escud´e G., Jenkins J. S., 2014, MNRAS, 441, 1545 Udry S., et al., 2007, A&A, 469, L43 Valenti J. A., Fischer D. A., 2005, ApJS, 159, 141 Wittenmyer R. A., et al., 2012, ApJ, 753, 169 Yasui C., Kobayashi N., Tokunaga A. T., Saito M., Tokoku C., 2009, ApJ, 705, 54 Figure A2. Time-series and mean subtracted radial velocities for the star HD72673. The dashed line represents the best straight line fit to the data. The rms scatter around the fit in m s−1is shown in the plot. ual radial velocity measurements where we have removed 5σ outliers that corresponded to bad weather observations, and therefore had very low S/N data, like the point at BJD- 2453724.79378. After subtracting off the mean of the data, which we use as our standard flat noise model, we find a rms of 1.44 m s−1. The lower panel shows the same data except zoomed in on the most densely sampled observing epoch (BJD 2453500 - 2454000). Some structure is found in the radial velocities throughout this epoch and could be the first signatures of low-amplitude Doppler shifts induced by orbiting low-mass planets, or stellar activity signals affect- ing the velocities. In any case the HARPS velocities agree that HD72673 does not show large radial velocity variations and is a useful star for testing the precision we can achieve with our CORALIE pipeline. Yu C., Li H., Li S., Lubow S. H., Lin D. N. C., 2010, ApJ, 712, 198 van Leeuwen F., 2007, A&A, 474, 653 A1 CORALIE Observations APPENDIX A: STABLE STAR RESULTS To confirm the stability of the CORALIE pipeline reduction and analysis procedure we have observed a star known to be radial velocity stable at the ∼2 m s−1level that should provide an ideal test candidate for our method. HD72673 is a bright (V =6.38), nearby (12.2 pc), and inactive (logR′ HK = - 4.946 Isaacson & Fischer 2010) G9 dwarf star that has a metallicity of -0.38±0.04 dex (Marsakov & Shevelev 1988; Santos et al. 2004; Valenti & Fischer 2005), and a mass and age of 0.814±0.032 M⊙ and 1.48+5.44 −1.48 Gyrs (Takeda et al. 2007), respectively. In the upper panel of Fig. A1 we show the radial ve- locity timeseries for HD72673 observed with HARPS that was taken from the ESO Archive1. The data span a base- line of over 1900 days in total and comprise 363 individ- 1 Based on data obtained from the ESO Science Archive Facility under request number JJENKINS 50958. MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) Over the course of four years we have performed 108 observa- tions of the star HD72673 with CORALIE, combining data from this project and also from the HAT-South (Bakos et al. 2012) CORALIE observations. The sampling and time base- line provide an excellent diagnostic test of the long term sta- bility that is currently attained with the CORALIE using the procedure described in Jord´an et al. (2014). For the observations of HD72673 we aimed to get a S/N of around 100 across the optical regime of interest, leading to typical integration times of ∼5 minutes. Fig. A2 shows the full radial velocity dataset as a function of time and clearly we see only a small linear trend over the full base- line of observations. No large systematic trends are found in our dataset and the gradient of the best fit we show is 0.004 m s−1/day, well below the intrinsic scatter of our procedure. The rms scatter for the full data is found to be 10.9 m s−1, however after removing a 5-σ outlier due to low S/N we arrive at a scatter of 8.7 m s−1, or 8.6 m s−1after subtraction of the linear trend shown in the figure. There- fore, we consider the precision of the CORALIE observa- tions to be 9 m s−1, consistent with the precision reported by Jord´an et al., but covering a longer time baseline. 20 J.S. Jenkins et al. APPENDIX B: MMSE PERIODOGRAMS The minimum mean square error periodograms from the ra- dial velocity timeseries data discussed in this work. The ver- tical dashed lines mark the signals detected by the MCMC search algorithm. APPENDIX E: ACTIVITY INDICATOR PERIODOGRAMS Lomb-Scargle periodograms of the activity indicators mea- sured from the CORALIE and HARPS timeseries spectra. APPENDIX F: ASAS PERIODOGRAMS Lomb-Scargle periodograms of the ASAS timeseries V -band photometric data for the six stars that show peaks that could be related to magnetic activity on the surface of the star. APPENDIX G: RADIAL VELOCITIES Here we provide all radial velocities that are discussed in this work. APPENDIX C: MCMC POSTERIOR DENSITIES Here we show the posterior densities from our MCMC search for signals in the radial velocities for all targets in this work. We show the densities from the samplings for the periods, semiamplitudes, and eccentricities for all signals. APPENDIX D: CORALIE CHROMOSPHERIC ACTIVITY INDICES We measure the CORALIE activities using only four echelle orders, even though the regions we require for the SMW pass- bands are found across five orders. We drop one of the orders (order 4) due to an excess of noise at the blue end, which is due to the position of the echellogram where the V pass- band is found and therefore including this order enhances the uncertainty in the S-index and, in general, artificially increases the activity value making each star appear more active than it really is. We note that this could be taken out by calibration to other chromospheric indexes. We show the CORALIE extraction regions in Fig. D1. We compute the activities by integrating the square continuum V (3891-3911A) and R (3991-4011A) bandpasses and taking the ratio of these against the integrated flux in the triangular core bandpasses, described in the following series of equations: fj,i = ℑj,i ∗ Bj,i ∗ δλ (D1) Scont = P (fV,i + fR,i) P (BV,i + BR,i) ∗ δλ Score = P (fK,i + fH,i) P (BK,i + BH,i) ∗ δλ rP(cid:16)q(σ2 )(cid:17)2 P (BV,i + BR,i) ∗ δλ rP(cid:16)q(σ2 )(cid:17)2 P (BK,i + BH,i) ∗ δλ + σ2 fK,i + σ2 fH,i fV,i fR,i (D2) (D3) (D4) (D5) σScont = σScore = The cont and core subscripts represent the continuum and core regions of the spectrum respectively, ℑ is the flux measured in each wavelength domain (i), j here de- notes either the V,R,K, or H bandpass regions, and δλ is the wavelength step (dispersion), which at the resolution of CORALIE is ∼0.023A. MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 21 Figure B1. Periodograms from top left to bottom right: HD9174, HD48265, HD68402, HD72892, HD128356, HD143361, HD147873, HD147873 residuals after fitting out the best fit Keplerian signal associated with the raw data primary spike, HD152079, HD154672, HD165155, and HD224538. The dashed vertical lines represent the periods detected by the MCMC analysis. Table G1. HD9174 BJD RV Error BJD CORALIE HARPS RV Error 2455160.5362269 2455161.5372730 2455162.5377306 2455467.6819298 2455468.7578863 2455878.6618959 2455879.6756525 2456160.7988170 2456164.7903294 2456307.5567717 2456308.5698681 2456675.6083797 2456676.6025593 2456881.8675908 2456882.8265879 2456883.7721760 7.2 -11.8 30.2 -35.8 -25.8 -8.9 -5.9 6.0 38.0 23.0 20.0 -22.0 -16.0 -20.2 -17.2 -13.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 2455188.6187049 2455883.6145165 2455885.5904695 2456183.7872355 2456184.6697746 2456184.8402196 2456185.7970768 2456442.9352036 2456461.9331703 2456463.8950719 2456561.7814364 2456562.5748725 2456563.6078357 10.77 -10.66 -12.54 12.43 9.39 8.10 13.90 3.98 0.26 1.48 -13.46 -12.24 -13.76 0.55 0.86 1.03 0.48 0.79 0.92 0.55 0.69 0.74 0.77 0.50 0.86 0.78 MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) 22 J.S. Jenkins et al. Figure C1. Posterior densities for the signals HD9174b, HD48265b, HD68402b, HD72892b, and HD128356b. MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 23 Figure C2. Posterior densities for the signals HD143361b, HD147873b, HD147873c, HD152079b, and HD154672b. MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) 24 J.S. Jenkins et al. Figure C3. Posterior densities for the signals HD165155b and HD224538b. Figure D1. CORALIE echelle orders used to extract the S activity indices for HD128356. The square continuum bandpasses regions V and R are shown by the thick solid lines in the top and bottom plots, respectively. The thick triangular solid lines in the upper and lower center plots show the K and H bandpasses, respectively. MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 25 Figure E1. In each plot from top to bottom we show the periodograms for the BIS, FWHM, S, Hα, and He I indices. From top left to bottom right we show the stars HD9174, HD48265, HD68402, HD72892, HD128356, HD143361, HD147873, HD152079, HD154672, HD165155, and HD224538, respectively. MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) 26 J.S. Jenkins et al. Figure F1. From top left to bottom right we show the periodograms from ASAS data for the stars HD68402, HD147873, HD152079, HD154672, HD165155, and HD224538, respectively. Table G2. HD48265 BJD RV Error BJD CORALIE HARPS RV Error BJD MIKE RV Error 2455208.6992489 2455209.7264368 2455210.7165285 2455465.8329696 2455468.8765488 2455877.7963300 2455878.7843441 2455879.7984724 2455969.6052648 2455970.7499814 2455971.7266404 2456034.5026492 2456037.5096202 2456164.8925279 2456378.6064455 2456379.5444957 2456380.6001445 2456381.5979512 2456733.6079032 2456736.5950580 2456753.5245324 2456754.5405659 1.8 10.8 -29.2 16.8 27.8 -4.2 13.8 10.8 -19.2 -17.2 -21.2 13.8 37.8 15.8 -15.2 -21.2 -6.2 -15.2 2.9 19.9 3.9 7.9 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 2454365.8248037 2454366.8740710 2454367.8521212 2454580.5231386 2454581.5537085 2454724.8337096 2454725.8177884 2454726.7789038 2455651.5366350 2455883.7630397 2455885.7426863 2455992.5816638 2455994.5576882 2456183.8678319 2456185.8516258 2456442.4578668 2456444.4478133 2456562.8313800 -32.25 -25.18 -29.87 22.43 23.60 -14.14 -13.78 -14.84 -15.41 -7.88 -1.10 18.09 23.81 52.75 57.16 -16.22 -14.86 -12.48 0.77 0.99 0.62 0.64 0.56 0.59 0.53 0.80 0.56 0.70 0.92 0.56 0.61 0.59 0.66 0.91 1.07 0.73 2452920.8629 2453431.6073 2453455.5573 2453685.8138 2453774.6744 2453775.6763 2453784.6887 2453811.5943 2453987.9168 2454078.7826 2454081.7133 2454137.6436 2454138.6670 2454189.5669 2454483.6148 2454501.6725 2454522.6219 20.6 -30.2 -35.0 15.0 25.0 12.4 25.4 24.3 -7.7 -17.9 -23.4 -20.7 -28.7 -29.5 28.5 21.5 25.4 6.9 2.5 2.6 2.9 3.3 5.2 2.6 2.5 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.6 4.4 3.0 2.4 2.7 Table G3. HD68402 HARPS RV -21.04 -17.13 12.99 13.44 11.72 Error 1.51 1.66 1.46 1.51 2.07 BJD RV Error BJD CORALIE 2456442.5125503 2456444.4892384 2456562.9026514 2456563.8260976 2456563.9098232 2455268.5536332 2455269.5471815 2455270.5544347 2456034.5316938 2456037.5405384 2456307.7270563 2456308.7455901 2456675.7326419 2456675.7405950 2456735.5968024 2456736.6337750 2456752.5562350 2456754.5693098 2456823.4935737 2456825.4656166 2457075.6564372 2457318.8514672 11.4 0.4 4.4 -45.6 -31.6 -32.6 -18.6 47.4 64.4 45.0 33.0 38.0 53.0 33.0 8.0 -43.1 -19.1 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 16.0 17.0 12.0 14.0 13.0 15.0 15.0 12.0 14.0 14.0 MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) Table G4. HD72892 BJD RV Error BJD CORALIE HARPS RV Error New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 27 2456442.5223438 2456443.5281580 2456444.5101783 2456448.4605785 2456449.4624615 2456450.4614518 2456462.4520834 2456463.4499736 -195.55 -167.05 -134.83 144.30 248.19 357.16 -114.51 -137.72 1.12 1.77 1.36 1.29 0.82 1.21 1.13 1.69 2455698.5075694 2455699.5368477 2455700.5250521 2455968.7197064 2455969.7048152 2455970.6308925 2455972.6288495 2456034.5646797 2456037.5717726 2456307.7713660 2456308.7833076 2456378.6598031 2456379.5959537 2456463.4576754 2456464.4530818 2456465.4567122 2456467.4802779 2456675.7562736 2456734.6035167 2456752.6156272 2456754.5855485 2456824.4911691 2457184.4724902 223.8 337.8 444.8 -111.2 -77.2 -55.2 61.8 -129.2 -156.2 -110.3 -126.3 159.7 128.7 -57.3 -80.3 -111.3 -147.3 -196.3 134.1 -176.9 -154.9 -138.9 -161.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 14.0 9.0 16.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 13.0 15.0 13.0 BJD RV Error BJD CORALIE HARPS RV Error 2455268.9086205 2455269.8196218 2455349.6784180 2455350.6814856 2455351.6612024 2455352.6667444 2455609.8365887 2455611.8334577 2455699.7015878 2455967.8551252 2455968.8240257 2455970.8305273 2455971.7742759 2455972.8507044 2456034.8259987 2456037.8192588 2456160.4758000 2456164.4757457 2456381.7122851 2456463.5427541 2456464.6240954 2456465.6419917 2456467.5931893 2456467.6621264 2456676.8044908 2456734.7225188 2456752.8173417 2456823.7074373 2456825.7157702 2456881.5522933 2456882.5702439 -22.1 -34.1 -16.1 14.9 -4.1 -6.1 -27.1 -13.1 9.9 27.9 39.9 20.9 31.9 46.9 11.9 27.9 -6.1 -9.1 15.9 -23.1 -35.1 -45.1 -26.1 -24.1 19.8 -35.2 -30.2 1.8 6.8 4.8 20.8 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 14.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 16.0 9.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 15.0 2454248.6023117 2454248.6108994 2454248.6176931 2454367.5031968 2454369.5091063 2454577.6158842 2454578.5680249 2454581.7357981 2455271.8690903 2455649.7321937 2455650.7148680 2455651.7295683 2455786.4827996 2455787.4566297 2455992.7730262 2455993.7048066 2456063.6469346 2456064.6145915 2456065.6564584 2456183.4873901 2456442.6772101 2456443.6828424 2456444.6629996 2456450.4938930 2456462.6290393 2456463.5862333 2456562.4755850 16.75 21.79 17.99 -31.24 -37.97 35.96 35.50 41.67 -23.11 -6.46 -6.51 -7.26 50.87 49.97 9.21 9.29 34.67 35.94 36.26 -31.26 -46.63 -46.21 -45.18 -40.30 -36.01 -35.50 -3.37 1.66 1.69 0.69 0.66 2.49 0.48 0.52 0.47 0.36 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.36 0.39 0.52 0.78 0.45 0.43 0.60 0.46 0.77 0.91 0.62 0.54 0.80 0.56 Table G5. HD128356 MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) 28 J.S. Jenkins et al. Table G6. HD143361 BJD RV Error BJD CORALIE HARPS RV Error BJD 2454253.7711993 2454253.7786414 2454367.5565354 2454368.5376348 2454578.7885789 2454581.8076461 2455271.8809609 2455649.7540214 2455786.5132754 2455992.7979663 2455993.7269629 2456063.6718947 2456064.6371793 2456065.6805773 2456184.5078021 2456442.6901584 2456443.6959898 2456444.7117386 2456462.6564547 10.50 9.06 -23.81 -23.64 -83.52 -81.90 19.62 -83.51 -30.99 55.69 65.78 68.27 65.24 64.11 53.36 -22.67 -19.26 -20.46 -25.82 3.17 2.22 1.09 1.13 0.83 0.92 0.77 0.94 0.89 1.23 0.89 2.14 0.87 0.80 0.84 0.90 1.96 1.79 0.97 2452864.57934 2453130.83712 2453872.73696 2453987.50506 2453988.49460 2454190.80550 2454217.84734 2454277.65819 2454299.55951 2454300.58038 2454339.50049 2454501.87197 2454650.68383 2454925.87115 2454963.75707 2454965.78744 2455019.67861 2455269.8328453 2455269.8477334 2455349.6897288 2455349.7090115 2455350.6957245 2455350.7085995 2455351.6772114 2455351.6921046 2455352.6804150 2455352.6925204 2455465.4819439 2455465.4921698 2455466.4810091 2455467.4908225 2455786.5181546 2455787.5128697 2455788.5005189 2455967.8637123 2455969.8564628 2455970.8440395 2455971.8236578 2455972.8379866 2456034.8111668 2456037.8046599 2456160.4914594 2456161.4914636 2456162.5761051 2456164.4909267 2456381.7216801 2456381.7325023 2456463.6056985 2456465.6944440 2456467.5744277 2456554.5120400 2456554.5219817 2456555.5573278 2456676.8679860 2456734.7382463 2456752.8000194 2456754.7548507 2456823.7338512 2456825.7551623 2456881.6125148 2456882.6036411 2457281.5366030 31.9 30.9 9.9 6.9 -5.2 -11.2 3.9 -0.2 -8.2 2.9 -37.2 -41.2 -44.2 -36.2 -28.2 -32.2 -18.2 48.8 55.8 49.8 61.8 52.8 73.8 73.7 49.7 58.7 53.7 46.7 -14.3 -13.3 -23.3 -22.3 -75.3 -28.3 -49.3 -33.3 -68.4 -61.4 -39.4 -51.4 -33.4 -36.4 5.6 17.6 71.5 12.0 12.0 14.0 15.0 17.0 22.0 13.0 14.0 13.0 12.0 19.0 18.0 20.0 13.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 18.0 12.0 15.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 23.0 16.0 20.0 13.0 14.0 12.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 12.0 15.0 19.0 MIKE RV 43.03 -6.28 28.04 38.49 25.06 0.00 -7.02 -29.11 -37.73 -36.03 -52.16 -94.15 -105.06 21.04 34.93 31.39 27.65 Error 7.14 2.65 2.62 3.45 2.81 3.43 3.38 3.43 3.04 2.51 3.39 3.01 6.82 2.76 3.05 2.82 2.46 MIKE RV 0.00 -9.92 -5.91 -72.79 134.00 156.04 Error 3.38 3.36 3.56 5.00 4.93 4.48 HARPS RV -165.09 86.26 77.96 -117.74 -121.37 -120.54 124.30 -73.82 -102.21 -93.49 -92.88 -86.93 -91.50 -83.90 -77.92 -80.38 -90.35 250.12 258.36 223.49 219.57 95.12 62.78 Error BJD 2453189.66944 2453190.64093 2453191.65473 2453551.62308 2454339.53949 2455001.70315 4.83 2.48 1.73 1.27 1.56 1.57 1.42 2.01 2.08 1.66 2.53 1.92 2.10 3.01 1.67 2.00 2.11 3.48 1.87 3.03 3.41 2.19 3.16 Table G7. HD147873 CORALIE BJD 2455268.8296124 2455269.8954986 2455270.8623072 2455349.7478270 2455351.7263025 2455352.7243194 2455465.5203302 2455466.5103888 2455467.5077317 2455468.4926389 2455786.5547221 2455787.5512296 2455788.5404119 2455968.8355111 2455970.8644298 2456034.8536087 2456037.8611090 2456160.5035894 2456161.5099351 2456164.5890537 2456307.8687079 2456308.8690886 2456381.7577061 2456463.6629499 2456464.6620073 2456554.5635006 2456555.4998324 2456676.8378428 2456733.8400326 2456734.7541033 2456735.7646576 2456736.8330743 2456752.8898318 2456754.7704681 2456823.7610291 2456824.7569383 2456825.8288093 2456881.6254682 2456882.6396241 2456883.5912828 2457179.6595698 2457180.6006537 2457181.5978747 2457182.5980141 2457183.7046858 2457184.6231976 RV 66.7 58.7 41.7 4.7 -9.3 3.7 38.7 25.7 39.7 32.7 -195.3 -190.3 -170.3 100.7 74.7 -19.3 8.7 15.7 22.7 55.7 112.7 117.7 -119.3 -189.3 -190.3 144.7 118.7 -0.3 -56.8 -50.8 -55.8 -47.8 50.2 76.2 -155.8 -181.8 -168.8 130.2 151.2 149.2 -126.8 -127.8 -142.8 -120.8 -119.8 -111.8 Error BJD 2454365.5676419 2454580.8338639 2454581.8459239 2454724.4802846 2454725.4983255 2454726.4832450 2455271.8407105 2455649.7654997 2455786.5492317 2455787.4838577 2455787.6993011 2455788.4587689 2455788.6109888 2455788.7074614 2455992.8338522 2455993.7871396 2455994.7989047 2456063.7089752 2456064.7231089 2456183.4686863 2456184.4750146 2456442.7882798 2456444.7375998 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 14.0 13.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 13.0 13.0 16.0 15.0 13.0 13.0 14.0 13.0 MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) Table G8. HD152079 New Planetary Systems from the CHEPS 29 BJD RV Error BJD CORALIE HARPS RV Error BJD MIKE RV Error 2455786.6489688 2456463.6745808 2456464.7049704 2456465.6766024 2456555.5745883 2456676.8549118 2456733.8533258 2456734.8495354 2456735.8130233 2456736.8653294 2456752.8688188 2456754.7851172 2456823.7916933 2456824.7696220 2456825.8154610 2456881.6859346 2456882.6527789 -41.7 14.3 17.3 8.3 -0.8 2.2 -1.2 -17.2 -10.2 7.8 8.8 0.8 16.8 -3.2 -8.2 10.8 -10.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 13.0 11.0 12.0 15.0 12.0 14.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 12.0 2454253.8065363 2454367.5811986 2454579.8264105 2455649.8008277 2455650.7595904 2455651.8003619 2455786.5261504 2455787.5966780 2455992.9178275 2455993.8444865 2456064.7106335 2456184.5322797 2456442.7259868 2456443.7319729 2456444.7714764 2456462.7752093 2456561.5772596 2456563.5044073 -20.75 -22.95 -29.21 -30.70 -29.43 -29.35 -22.51 -22.46 1.25 3.09 19.86 44.23 24.77 27.81 25.93 19.99 18.97 18.41 1.75 1.00 0.72 1.01 0.96 0.84 0.96 0.85 1.01 0.93 0.89 0.93 0.90 1.62 1.28 1.30 1.25 1.18 2452917.4972 2453542.6649 2453872.8022 2453987.5436 2453988.5202 2454190.8274 2454277.6950 2454299.6134 2454725.5353 2454925.9161 2454963.7753 2454993.7093 2455001.7291 2455017.6624 2455019.6938 -24.3 22.5 -8.5 -10.3 -12.6 -13.7 -19.7 -19.6 -35.1 -29.2 -22.6 -27.5 -25.3 -28.5 -22.5 6.2 3.3 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.9 3.4 3.3 2.6 2.4 2.7 2.4 2.9 2.4 2.2 HARPS RV 225.90 227.85 82.73 71.32 -18.52 -195.00 -87.04 -126.00 -98.02 53.14 50.37 48.70 188.65 -86.65 -86.90 -163.39 -164.91 39.66 36.30 Error BJD 0.69 1.10 0.61 0.52 0.63 0.66 0.66 0.78 0.83 1.25 0.66 0.74 0.85 0.69 1.29 0.91 1.02 0.85 0.89 2453189.71323 2453190.70833 2453191.72040 2453254.50616 2453596.68926 2453810.90968 2453872.81362 2454189.87086 2454189.87898 2454190.84022 2454215.86050 2454216.78927 2454217.87254 2454277.70250 2454299.62096 2454339.55738 2454501.89596 2455018.68932 MIKE RV -141.83 -143.62 -147.14 175.30 130.45 -5.00 260.75 -80.09 -90.28 -57.35 242.59 243.77 250.94 67.40 0.00 -145.72 -143.22 213.92 Error 2.89 2.73 3.33 2.60 3.10 2.56 2.45 3.62 3.52 2.84 2.52 2.54 2.76 2.74 2.64 4.15 2.71 2.17 Table G9. HD154672 BJD RV Error BJD CORALIE 2454367.5951401 2454368.6185060 2454578.8112608 2454581.8703510 2455271.8920649 2455649.8248173 2455786.5972307 2455993.8674482 2455994.8361631 2456063.7424430 2456064.7465191 2456065.7448182 2456183.5270912 2456442.7630531 2456443.7800510 2456462.7983801 2456462.8102434 2456561.4986867 2456563.5280947 2455268.8925184 2455286.7126041 2455286.7482435 2455287.7447603 2455287.7803973 2455288.7337184 2455288.7776633 2455349.7906916 2455350.8687367 2455351.7067623 2455352.7571340 2455353.6007870 2455354.6329905 2455354.7244421 2455355.6194464 2455355.7115550 2455433.5945428 2455434.5939320 2455467.5419737 2455468.5360292 2455786.6672674 2456034.8785575 2456037.8864541 2456160.5115180 2456161.5235072 2456164.5556060 2456381.7967325 2456463.6867223 2456464.7194041 2456734.8670344 2456735.8301098 2456823.8058978 2456825.8537984 2456882.6789128 -51.4 -133.4 -137.4 -130.4 -136.4 -139.4 -138.4 161.6 177.6 173.6 172.6 135.6 151.6 136.6 135.6 148.6 -58.4 -68.4 -152.4 -140.4 -128.5 94.5 86.5 -99.5 -68.5 60.5 47.5 -212.5 -226.5 -17.5 -20.5 153.5 178.5 44.5 9.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Table G10. HD165155 BJD RV Error BJD CORALIE HARPS RV Error 2455698.7379179 2455786.6994564 2455786.7108277 2455787.6641024 2455787.6754805 2455788.6765746 2455788.6875372 2456034.9332917 2456381.8066463 2456381.8190355 2456463.7613374 2456464.7345595 2456555.5907771 2456555.6041047 2456733.8878823 2456735.8673459 2456754.8071800 2456823.8481613 2456825.8695333 2456881.7083646 2456883.6490320 2457077.8839217 2457183.7828036 2457184.6886555 2457312.5069791 2457318.4944200 -70.4 36.6 75.6 35.6 35.6 48.6 67.6 20.6 54.6 47.6 59.6 11.6 -42.4 -39.4 145.2 111.2 115.2 112.2 89.2 99.2 85.2 120.2 -250.8 -250.8 -254.8 -279.8 9.0 13.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 13.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 9.0 9.0 11.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 13.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 13.0 16.0 15.0 17.0 16.0 2454577.8573518 2454578.8259992 2454579.8512477 2455650.8171652 2455786.6216504 2455787.4979049 2455788.6355855 2455993.8895322 2455994.8596255 2456063.7543293 2456064.7595490 2456065.7693045 2456183.5412473 2456442.8006921 2456443.8064819 2456444.8081381 2456461.7756434 2456462.8238912 2456463.7557595 2456561.4867891 70.07 67.18 67.69 -83.60 -5.87 -3.44 -1.89 -6.64 -7.98 -35.54 -35.45 -33.41 -15.93 14.89 19.51 17.67 13.11 9.33 11.89 -62.19 0.70 0.80 0.74 1.14 1.04 0.96 1.07 1.23 1.57 1.82 0.96 2.68 1.13 1.18 2.63 1.57 1.08 1.42 1.71 1.12 MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002) 30 J.S. Jenkins et al. Table G11. HD224538 MIKE RV -2.66 0.00 7.12 -13.98 3.92 -7.75 Error 2.86 3.27 2.85 3.23 3.86 3.09 BJD RV Error BJD CORALIE 2455196.5457833 2455197.5258897 2455198.5268449 2455352.9431841 2455465.6728602 2455468.6569334 2455497.5904524 2455514.6207088 2455786.8585090 2455787.8646502 2455788.8218648 2455877.6116650 2455878.5958784 2455879.6063410 2455969.5203878 2455970.5204393 2456160.6541736 2456164.7802416 2456554.6541123 2456554.6624176 2456555.7132051 2456675.5534417 2456824.9242966 2457317.6711775 -63.9 -62.9 -54.9 -89.9 -55.9 -51.9 -52.9 -42.9 37.1 25.1 53.1 93.1 92.1 108.1 158.1 167.1 -25.9 -4.9 -68.9 -54.9 -76.9 -27.9 5.9 -3.1 2454365.6728323 2454724.7162997 2454725.6845580 2454726.6664725 2454727.6026469 2455786.8072676 2455787.6269341 2455787.8105224 2455787.9313791 2455788.5991810 2455788.7826534 2455883.5865245 2455885.5121047 2455885.5744505 2455885.7033086 2456064.9384446 2456183.7248653 2456185.6754003 2456442.9267855 2456461.8887446 2456561.7050322 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 19.0 22.0 9.0 9.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 16.0 13.0 36.0 HARPS RV -72.92 87.00 87.50 89.44 87.24 -5.84 -12.49 -16.34 -14.21 -14.30 -14.01 46.83 54.40 52.39 51.81 67.21 -67.99 -70.76 -116.37 -110.55 -109.01 Error BJD 2453189.91295 2453190.91771 2453191.91314 2453254.73446 2454338.83927 2454339.75448 0.84 0.93 1.02 0.65 0.83 0.80 0.96 0.73 0.82 1.26 1.33 1.19 1.30 1.53 1.43 0.85 0.86 1.02 1.14 1.03 0.97 MNRAS 000, 1–20 (2002)
1304.6043	1	1304	2013-04-22T18:15:51	Solid state physics of impact crater formation: further considerations	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Impact craters exist on solid surface planets, their satellites and many asteroids.The aim of this paper is to propose a theoretical expression for the product $\rho r^{3} v_{1}^{2}$,where the three symbols denote the mass density,radius and speed of the impactor. The expression is derived using well known results of solid state physics,and it can be used in estimating parameters of impactors which have led to formation of craters on various solid bodies in the Solar System.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Solid state physics of impact crater formation: further considerations V.Celebonovic Institute of Physics,Pregrevica 118,11080 Zemun-Belgrade,Serbia [email protected] Abstract Impact craters exist on solid surface planets, their satellites and many asteroids.The aim of this paper is to propose a theoretical ex- 2 1,where the three symbols denote the pression for the product ρr mass density,radius and speed of the impactor. The expression is de- rived using well known results of solid state physics,and it can be used in estimating parameters of impactors which have led to formation of craters on various solid bodies in the Solar System.1 v 3 1to appear in Rev.Mex.Astron.Astrophys, October 2013 1 Introduction Craters of various sizes have been observed on the terrestrial planets,their satellites and the major part of the asteroids.The study of these craters, and the resulting constraints on the related impactors has become a separate field of research in planetary science,see for example [8].At the time of this writing, the latest example testifying about the importance of impacts into the Earth and their consequences is the small asteroid which entered the atmosphere over the city of Chelyabinsk in Russia on February 15, 2013. One of the fundamental questions concerning the impactors is what can be concluded about them by combining astronomical data with results of solid state physics. Recent theoretical work for example [1] has shown that the application of elementary principles of solid state physics to this problem gives physi- cally plausible results in reasonable agreement with those obtained by celes- tial mechanics. It was assumed there that the material of the target was a crystal lattice,and the calculations were performed per unit volume. It was assumed in that paper that the condition for the formation of a crater is that the kinetic energy of a unit volume of the impactor has to be equal to the internal energy of a unit volume of the material of the target. The result was an expression for the minimal speed which an impactor of given parameters must have when hitting a target with a predefined set of pa- rameters, in order to form a crater. Obviously,a certain part of surfaces of planets,satellites,asteroids,.. in which impacts occur are granular. For recent theoretical work on "granular impact" see, for example,[3] or [11]. The aim of the calculation reported here is to take into account the di- mensional effects - to consider both the impactor and the crater it forms as objects of finite dimensions. The novelty of the approach discussed in the next section, compared to existing work such as [4],is the generality - it is based on principles of solid state physics,and it can be applied to any solid material. Formation of impact craters is here discussed from the viewpoint of pure solid state physics as the following analogous problem: what kinetic energy of an impactor is needed to produce a hole of given dimensions in a material with a predefined set of parameters? The calculations will be per- formed under the assumptions that the material of the target is a crystal,that one of the five usual bonding types exists in it and that in the impact the target does not heat up to its melting temperature, so that solid state physics can be applied. For recent work on the problem of heating in impacts see [2]. 1 The expression for the cohesion energy used in the present work is one of the theoretically possible expressions. More details are avaliable, for example, in [7]. 2 Calculations The physical keypoint of the calculation to be discussed in this section is the idea that the kinetic energy of the impactor must be greater than or equal to the internal energy of some volume, V2 of the material of the target. The kinetic energy of the impactor of mass m1 and speed v1 is obviously: Ek = 1 2 m1v2 1 (1) The internal energy of a volume V2 of the target material is equal to the sum of the following three "contributions" : the cohesion energy EC,the thermal energy ET and the energy EH (T ) required for heating the specimen by an amount ∆T in the moment of impact: EI = EC + ET + EH(T ) (2) The condition for the formation of a crater as a consequence of impact of a projectile into a target is, in general terms, given by Ek = EI (3) In order to ensure the stability of matter, the interatomic interaction energy must have the form where R is the inetartomic distance, the first term on the right hand side is attractive and the second one repulsive.It can be shown [5] that the cohesion energy is given by where B0 = −V (∂P/∂V )T = ρ(∂P/∂ρ)T is the bulk modulus of a material and Ωm the volume per pair [5]. The speed of sound waves in a material with pressure P and density ρ is given by ¯u2 = ∂P ∂ρ 2 (6) E = −K Rp + C Rn EC = − 9B0Ωm pn (4) (5) and therefore EC = −9 ΩmB0 pn = −9( Ωm pn )ρ ∂P ∂ρ = −9 Ωmρ¯u2 pn (7) The analytical form of the function ET depends on the temperature of the solid. It can be shown (for example [7]) that for temperatures kBT0 >> ¯h¯u a (8) (¯h is Planck's constant divided by 2π, ¯u is the mean speed of sound in the solid and a is the lattice constant),one should use the "high temperature" limit for the thermal energy. Inserting for example ¯u = 5km/s and a = 5 × 10−6m it follows that T0 >> 77K. The thermal energy ET is given by ET = 3NνkBT D3(x) (9) where x = TD/T , TD is the Debye temperature,ν is the number of particles in the elementary crystal cell,N is the number of elementary crystal cells in the specimen,and kB is Boltzmann's constant. The symbol D3(x) denotes the n = 3 case of the Debye function, which is given by Dn(x) = n xn Z x 0 tndt Exp[t] − 1 = (n/xn)xn[ 1 n − x 2(n + 1) + B2kx2k (2k + n)(2k)! ] ∞ Xk=1 (10) and B2k denote Bernoulli's numbers. Integrating and retaining the terms up to and including second order leads to: ET ∼= 3NνkBT [1 − 3 8 TD T + ( 1 20 )( TD T )2] (11) The specific heat CV is given by CV = ∂ET ∂T = 3NνkB(D3(TD/T ) − (TD/T )D′ 3(TD/T )) (12) which leads to the following approximate result: CV ∼= 3NνkB[1 − ( 1 20 )( TD T )2 + ( 1 560 )( TD T )4] (13) 3 The energy EH (T ) is obviously given by EH = CV (T1 − T ), where T1 is the temperature to which the material of the target heats up in the moment of impact and T is the initial temperature. One of the problems consists in knowing the volume V2,which is,in first approximation,equal to the volume of the crater. It is known from theoretical work [4] and references given there that the form of a crater is determined by a combination of "gravity scaling" and "strength scaling", where the term "strength" reffers to the material strength of the target. Explicite expressions for the form of craters exist in [4] but they are applicable to 4 material types. In order to simplify somewhat the calculations,and get slightly more general results, it was assumed in the present work that craters have the shape of a half of a rotating elipsoid,with distinct semi axes,denoted by a,b and c. Physically,a and b denote the semi axes of the "opening" of the crater,while c is the depth. In that approximation,the volume of the crater is obviously given by V2 = πabc (14) 2 3 Inserting the definition of the mass density (ρ1 = m1 ) in eq.(1) and assuming V1 further that the impactor has the form of a sphere of radius r1,the following expression for the kinetic energy of the impactor is obtained: Ek = 1 2 m1v2 1 = 1 2 × 4 3 πr3 1ρ1v2 1 = 2 3 πρ1r3 1v2 1 (15) Inserting eqs.(7), (11),(13) and (15) into (3) one gets the final form of the energy condition which has to be satisfied for the formation of an impact crater: 3kBT1Nν[1 − +( 1 560 )( TD T )4 − 1 420 )2 + TD T1 3 8 T 4 T 3T1 − − ( TD 1 20 T 3¯u2ρΩm npνkBT1 T 2 D T T1 ) ( 1 10 2πρ1 3 ] = r3 1v2 1 (16) The number N is equal to the ratio of the volume of the crater, approximated by eq.(14), and the volume of the elementary crystal cell,ve: N = V /ve. Equation (16) groups known or measurable parameters on the left hand side, while on the right hand side it contains parameters of the impactor. Applying this equation demands the knowledge of the equation of state (EOS) of the material of the target. Generally speaking,regardless of its detailed form, an 4 EOS can be expressed in the following analytical form P (ρ) = ai( ρ ρ0 )i ∞ Xi=0 (17) where ai are some coefficients, ρ0 is the density at some pressure P0 and ρ is the density at pressure P . It follows that ( ∂P ∂ρ ) = ∞ Xi=0 (i + 1)ai+1( ρ ρ0 )i (18) A well known example of the EOS of a solid is the Birch-Murnaghan EOS [12] ρ ρ0 (19) 3B0 P (ρ) = ρ ρ0 )7/3 − ( 2 "( )5/3# × n1 + (3/4)(B ′ 0 − 4)h(ρ/ρ0)2/3 − 1io The symbols ρ0 and ρ denote the mass density of a specimen under consid- eration at the initial value of the pressure P0 and at some arbitrary value P . More refined results could be obtained by using analytic approximations to the Helmholtz free energy, from which all the thermodynamic potentials can be derived. This is,for example, the approach used in the ANEOS EOS [13]. However, ANEOS uses a file of up to 40 parameters for the characteri- zation of materials,which complicates its applications. 3 A test example As a test of the applicability of the procedure discussed in the preceeding paragraph, it was applied to the Barringer crater in Arizona. One of the min- erals found in and around the crater is Forsterite - Mg2SiO4. The dimensions of the crater are a = b = 1.186km and c = 0.17km. Take that the expo- nents in the expression for the interparticle potential are p = 1 and n = 9. Assume furher that ¯V = 5km/s,which is the mean value of the measured velocity of seismic waves in the Earth, that the temperature before impact is T = 300K and that the target heats up to T1 = 550K at the point of impact. This is safely far from the melting temperature of Forsterite (which is around 5 TM = 1900C) so that solid state physics can be applied. All the parameters of Forsterite exist in the literature, such as [10] or http://webmineral.com. Taking the necessary values,and assuming that the impactor had a radius of ∼= 41km/s. r1 = 65m and density of ρ1 = 8500kg/m3 one finally gets that v1 This value is larger than existing results, such as for example [9] or [6].The discrepancy can be traced to the assumption, made in the calculation re- ported here, that the target material is only Forsterite. In reality, this is certainly not the case. Taking that 10 percent of the target is Forsterite,and ∼= 15km/s , which is that the object had a radius of r1 = 60m would give v1 much closer to the results of celestial mechanics. 4 Discussion In this paper we have presented a simple procedure which gives the possi- bility of estimating the value of the product of the density and radius of the impactor and the speed of impact: ρ1r3 1v2 in terms of various material pa- rameters of the target and the impactor. The expression for this product has been derived using basic principles of solid state physics, without any spe- cial assumption(s) about the materials. In (at least some of the) terrestrial applications the density of the impactor and the inclination of the trajectory can (in principle) be measured or estimated, which gives the possibility of estimating the impact speed if the value of r1 can somehow be estimated. The shape of the craters has been approximated as a half of a rotating elipsoid,regardless of the composition of the material of the target. As a first approximation, the speed of the seismic waves has been "put in" in- stead of being calculated from the equation of state of the material of the target. Calculating this speed would have demanded the precise knowledge 0 for of the chemical composition of the target materials,and of B0 and B ′ them. The impact of a projectile into a target leads to heating,and possi- bly melting and even vaporisation of the target around the impact point. The thermodynamic result of an impact depends on the heat capacity of the material of the target and on the kinetic energy of the impactor. The heat capacity can be measured, or theoretically estimated, assuming prior knowledge of the chemical composition of the target. Knowledge of the heat capacity is vital for estimates of the temperature to which the target heats in the impact.Therefore, the question is which impacts lead to melting and va- porisation of the material of the target,and which just provoke heating of the 6 target. Even if the material of the target gets partially melted and as such flows away, the dimensions of the crater formed by the impact are determined by the volume of the material pushed away in the impact. This volume is,in turn, determined by the ratio of the kinetic energy of the impactor to the internal energy of some volume of the target. Some details of this problem have been discussed in [2]. The general conclusion of work reported here is that by using simple well known results of solid state physics and a given appoximation of the shape of impact craters, it becomes possible to estimate the value of the product ρ1r3 1(v cos θ)2. This in turn can be used to draw conclusions about the impactors which made various craters on the solid surfaces of objects in the planetary system. 5 Acknowledgment This paper was prepared within the research project 174031 financed by the Ministry of Education Science and Technological Development of Serbia. I am grateful to the referee for helpful comments and to Dr. Jean Souchay from Observatoire de Paris for correspondence . References [1] Celebonovic,V.,and Souchay,J.,2010,in Publ.Astron.Obs.Belgrade,90,205 [2] Celebonovic,V.,2012, Serb.Astron.J.,184,83 [3] Clark, A.H. and Behringer,R.P.,2013, Europhys.Lett.,101,64001 [4] Holsapple, K.A., and Housen, K.R.,2007, Icarus, 187, 345 [5] Dolocan,V.,Dolocan,A.and Dolocan,V.O., 2008,Mod.Phys.Lett.,B22,2481 [6] King,D. 2007,Guidebook to the Geology of Barringer Meteorite Crater,Arizona, LPI CONTRIB.1355 7 [7] Landau,L.D.and Lifchitz,E.M. 1976,Statistical Physics,Vol.1., §65, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian) [8] Melosh,H.J. 1989, Impact Cratering,A Geologic Process (Clarendon Press,Oxford) [9] Melosh,H.and Collins,G.,2005,Nature,434,157 [10] Pandey,A.K. and Srivastava,A.P. 2011, Int.J.Mod.Phys.,B25, 1543 [11] Ringl,Ch.,Bringa,E.M. and Urbassek,H.M.,2012,Phys.Rev.,E86,061313 [12] Stacey,F.D., 2005,Rep.Progr.Phys.,68,341 [13] Thompson,S.L.1990,ANEOS Analytic Equations of State for Shock Physics Codes Input Manual,SANDIA REPORT SAND 89-2951 8
0905.3633	1	0905	2009-05-22T08:55:34	CoRoT-2a magnetic activity: hints for possible star-planet interaction	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	CoRoT-2a is a young (about 0.5 Gyr) G7V star accompanied by a transiting hot-Jupiter, discovered by the CoRoT satellite (Alonso et al. 2008; Bouchy et al. 2008). An analysis of its photospheric activity, based on spot modelling techniques previously developed by our group for the analysis of the Sun as a star, shows that the active regions on CoRoT-2a arised within two active longitudes separated by about 180 degrees and rotating with periods of 4.5221 and 4.5543 days, respectively, at epoch of CoRoT observations (112 continous days centered at 2007.6). We show that the total spotted area oscillates with a period of about about 8.9 days, a value close to 10 times the synodic period of the planet with respect to the active longitude pattern rotating in 4.5221 days. Moreover, the variance of the stellar flux is modulated in phase with the planet orbital period. This suggests a possible star-planet magnetic interaction, a phenomenon already seen in other extrasolar planetary systems hosting hot-Jupiters.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	CoRoT-2a magnetic activity: hints for possible star-planet interaction Isabella Pagano1, Antonino F. Lanza1, Giuseppe Leto1, Sergio Messina1, Pierre Barge2, Annie Baglin3 1 INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Italy; 2 Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, France; 3 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, France +39-09-7332243 +39-095-2937823 [email protected] CoRoT-2a is a young (≈0.5 Gyr) G7V star accompanied by a transiting hot-Jupiter, discovered by the CoRoT satellite (Alonso et al. 2008; Bouchy et al. 2008). An analysis of its photospheric activity, based on spot modelling techniques previously developed by our group for the analysis of the Sun as a star, shows that the active regions on CoRoT-2a arised within two active longitudes separated by about 180 degrees and rotating with periods of 4.5221 and 4.5543 days, respectively, at epoch of CoRoT observations (112 continous days centered at ≈2007.6). We show that the total spotted area oscillates with a period of about 28.9 days, a value close to 10 times the synodic period of the planet with respect to the active longitude pattern rotating in 4.5221 days. Moreover, the variance of the stellar flux is modulated in phase with the planet orbital period. This suggests a possible star-planet magnetic interaction, a phenomenon already seen in other extrasolar planetary systems hosting hot-Jupiters. planetary systems; hot-Jupiters SPI: Star Planet Interaction Introduction Among the 342 extrasolar planets discovered up to March 2009, about 25% are massive planets (Mpsini>0.2 MJ) in tight orbits (< 0.1 AU) around their parent stars. Cuntz et al. (2000) predicted that a giant planet in a close orbit may increase stellar activity by means of tidal and magnetospheric interactions. Observational support to such a Stellar-Planet Interaction (SPI) has been provided by several authors: e.g., Shkolnik et al. (2003, 2005, 2008) found chromospheric emission in several stars hosting planets to be variable with the planet orbital period; Henry et al. (2002) and Walker et al. (2008) found hints for photospheric activity modulation in phase with the planet orbital period. Several other independent studies have highlighted that a short-period planet can induce activity in the photosphere and upper atmosphere of its host star. The 1 nature of SPI appears to be strongly affected by both the stellar and planetary magnetic fields. Shkolnik et al. (2009) and Schmitt (2009) show that for extrasolar planets around young stars conditions similar to those observed for the Jupiter-Io system are met and consequently similar processes are expected to occur on far larger scales. Lanza (2008) describes the SPI considering the reconnection between the stellar coronal field and the magnetic field of the planet. Reconnection events produce energetic particles that, moving along magnetic field lines, impact onto the stellar chromosphere giving rise to a localized hot spot. Moreover, reconnection events in the corona might affect subphotospheric dynamo action in those stars producing localized photospheric (and chromospheric) activity migrating in phase with their planets. Long baseline and continuous observations provided by CoRoT (Baglin et al. 2006) are optimal to study the photospheric variability of the stars hosting the planets it detects. CoRoT has recently discovered a hot-Jupiter, CoRoT-2b, orbiting around a main-sequence G7 star which displays a remarkable photospheric activity (Alonso et al. 2008; Bouchy et al. 2008). A detailed spot modelling analysis of the light curve of CoRoT-2a has been performed by Lanza et al. (2009). Here we focus on the aspects suggesting the presence of a star-planet magnetic interaction. Observations CoRoT-2a was observed from May 16 to October 5, 2007. We extracted from the data archive the N2 chromatic light curves (Baudin et al. 2006) having a sampling of 512 s during the first week and 32 s thereinafter. The white colour light curve shown in Fig. 1 is obtained by the combination of red, green and blue fluxes (see Lanza et al 2009 for further details on data reduction). Transits and rotational modulation due to stellar activity are clearly visible. Results Active regions derived by spot modelling The high-quality data allow us to model the evolution of the active regions with a resolution time of 3.15 days. In Fig. 2 we show the normalized spot filling factor versus longitude and time, obtained by a maximum entropy spot modelling 2 method (see Lanza et al. 2009 for details). The star shows two active longitudes, one fixed in the adopted reference frame rotating with a period of 4.5221 days, the other slowly migrating, which corresponds to a rotation period of 4.5543 days. Signature of the two active regions can be easily found also in the light curve folded with the stellar rotation period, i.e. 4.5221 days, when flux is averaged in phase bins having a width of 0.05, as shown in Fig. 3. Star-Planet Interaction In order to search for light curve variability possibly linked to the planet orbit, we have folded the times series with the planet ephemeris - Pp=1.7429964 d, HJD0=2454237.5356 after Alonso et al. 2008 - and computed the average flux and its variance in phase bins of 0.05. A clear wave-like behavior is apparent in the flux variance vs. orbital phases as shown in Fig. 4. The maximum variability is observed when the planet is in front of the star, slightly before the planet transit, and the minimum when it is behind. We have analised the flux variance for the first 75 days of observations only (i.e., about 43 planet orbits), because the subsequent subset is useless for our analysis being strongly affected by jitter instrumental effects that produce outliers (easy to remove) and an increased noise that pollutes the flux variance. A further suggestion for SPI comes from the analysis of the total spotted area, plotted vs. time in Fig. 5 which shows a cyclic oscillation with a period of 28.9 ± 4.8 (1σ) days. Such a period is close to 10 times the synodic period of the planet with respect to the active longitude pattern rotating in 4.5221 days (Psyn= 2.836d). Discussion The suggested SPI can be explained by the model proposed by Lanza (2008). Specifically, if some subphotospheric dynamo action takes place in the star, the amplified field emerges once the radial gradient of its intensity reaches some threshold value. The emergence of the flux might be triggered by a small localized perturbation of the dynamo effect associated with the planet when it passes by the most active longitude. An integer number of synodic periods are necessary for the planet to trigger again field emergence in a given active longitude because the planetary perturbation can play a role only when the field is already close to the threshold thanks to the steady amplification provided by the stellar dynamo. 3 Acknowledgments: The present study is based on observations obtained with CoRoT, a space project operated by the French Space Agency, CNES, with participation of the Science Program of ESA, ESTEC/RSSD, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Germany and Spain. AFL, IP, GL and SM have been partially supported by the Italian Space Agency (ASI) under contract ASI/INAF I/015/07/0, WPP3170. References Alonso, R., et al 2008, A&A 482, L21 Baglin, A., Auvergne, M., Boisnard, L., et al. 2006, 36th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, 36, 3749 Baudin, F., et al., 2006, ESA SP-1306, Editors: M. Fridlund, A. Baglin, J. Lochard and L. Conroy. ISBN 92-9092-465-9, p.145 Bouchy, F. et al. 2008, A&A 482, L25 Cuntz, M. et al. 2000, ApJ 533, L15 Henry, G.W. et al. 2002, ApJ 577, L111 Lanza, A.F. 2008, A&A 487, 1163 Lanza, A. F., Rodonò, M., Pagano, I., Barge, P., Llebaria, A. 2003, A&A 403, 1135 Lanza, A. F., Pagano, I., Leto, G. et al., 2009, A&A, 493, 193 Schmitt, J.H.M.M., AIP Conf. Proc, Vol 1094, pp. 473, DOI:10.1063/1.3099151 Shkolnik, E. et al. 2003, ApJ 597,1092; Shkolnik, E. et al. 2005, ApJ 622, 1075 Shkolnik, E. et al. 2008, ApJ 676, 628 Shkolnik, E.,; et al. 2009, AIP Conf. Proc, Vol 1094, 275, DOI:10.1063/1.3099102 Walker, G.A.H. et al. 2008, A&A 482, 691 4 Figure 1. CoRoT-2ab white light time series. Time is measured in HJD since 2,450,000. 5 Figure 2. Isocontours of the ratio f/fmax where f is the spot covering factor and fmax its maximum value, vs time and longitude (from Lanza et al. 2009). Time is measured in HJD since 2,450,000. Figure 3. Flux folded with the stellar rotation period (P=4.5221 days). The minima at phases ≈0.47 and ≈0.85 are due to the two main spotted area whose evolution can be followed in Fig.1. 6 Figure 4. Flux variance vs planetary orbital phase (in bins of width 0.05). Phases are reckoned by means of the planet ephemeris P=1.7429964 d, HJD0=2454237.5356 after Alonso et al. 2008. Figure 5. Variation of the total spotted area vs time from the ME spot models. The area is measured in units of the stellar photosphere. The error bars account only for random errors in the area and have a semi-amplitude of 3 standard deviations. 7
1310.2428	2	1310	2013-12-05T10:28:55	A Super-Jupiter orbiting a late-type star: A refined analysis of microlensing event OGLE-2012-BLG-0406	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present a detailed analysis of survey and follow-up observations of microlensing event OGLE-2012-BLG-0406 based on data obtained from 10 different observatories. Intensive coverage of the lightcurve, especially the perturbation part, allowed us to accurately measure the parallax effect and lens orbital motion. Combining our measurement of the lens parallax with the angular Einstein radius determined from finite-source effects, we estimate the physical parameters of the lens system. We find that the event was caused by a $2.73\pm 0.43\ M_{\rm J}$ planet orbiting a $0.44\pm 0.07\ M_{\odot}$ early M-type star. The distance to the lens is $4.97\pm 0.29$\ kpc and the projected separation between the host star and its planet at the time of the event is $3.45\pm 0.26$ AU. We find that the additional coverage provided by follow-up observations, especially during the planetary perturbation, leads to a more accurate determination of the physical parameters of the lens.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	DRAFT VERSION OCTOBER 10, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 7/15/03 A SUPER-JUPITER ORBITING A LATE-TYPE STAR: A REFINED ANALYSIS OF MICROLENSING EVENT OGLE-2012-BLG-0406. Y. TSAPRAS1,R1,♠, J.-Y. CHOIK1, R. A. STREET1,♠, C. HANK1,⋆,‡, V. BOZZAN3,♦, A. GOULDU1,‡, M. DOMINIK∗R3,♦,♠,♣, J.-P. BEAULIEUP4,♣, A. UDALSKIO1,(cid:4), U. G. JØRGENSENN1,♦, T. SUMIM1,†, D. M. BRAMICHR2,R6, P. BROWNER3,♦, K. HORNER3,♣, M. HUNDERTMARKR3,♦, S. IPATOVN2, N. KAINSR2,♦, C. SNODGRASSR5,♦, I. A. AND STEELER4, (THE ROBONET COLLABORATION), K. A. ALSUBAIN2, J. M. ANDERSENN9, S. CALCHI NOVATIN3,N18, Y. DAMERDJIN8, C. DIEHLN15,N17, A. ELYIVN8,N19, E. GIANNININ15, S. HARDISN1, K. HARPSØEN5, T. C. HINSEN1,N10,N11, D. JUNCHERN1, E. KERINSN12, H. KORHONENN1, C. LIEBIGR3, L. MANCININ13, M. MATHIASENN1, M. T. PENNYU1, M. RABUSN14, S. RAHVARN6, G. SCARPETTAN3,N4,N16, J. SKOTTFELTN1,N5, J. SOUTHWORTHN7, J. SURDEJN8, J. TREGLOAN-REEDN7, C. VILELAN7, J. WAMBSGANSSN15, (THE MINDSTEP COLLABORATION), J. SKOWRONO1, R. POLESKIO1,U1, S. KOZŁOWSKIO1, Ł. WYRZYKOWSKIO1,O3, M. K. SZYMA ´NSKIO1, M. KUBIAKO1, P. PIETRUKOWICZO1, G. PIETRZY ´NSKIO1,O2, I. SOSZY ´NSKIO1, K. ULACZYKO1, (THE OGLE COLLABORATION), M. D. ALBROWP1, E. BACHELETP2,P3, R. BARRYP11, V. BATISTAP4, A. BHATTACHARYAM10, S. BRILLANTP5, J. A. R. CALDWELLP6, A. CASSANP4, A. COLEP7, E. CORRALESP4, CH. COUTURESP4, S. DIETERSP2, D. DOMINIS PRESTERP8, J. DONATOWICZP9, P. FOUQUÉP2,P3, J. GREENHILLP7, S. R. KANEP10, D. KUBASP4,P5, J.-B. MARQUETTEP4, J. MENZIESP12, C. PÈREP4, K. R. POLLARDP1, M. ZUBN15, G. CHRISTIEU6, D. L. DEPOYU2, S. DONGU3, J. DRUMMONDU9, B. S. GAUDIU1, C. B. HENDERSONU1, K. H. HWANGK1, Y. K. JUNGK1, A. KAVKAU1, J.-R. KOOU4, C.-U. LEEU4, D. MAOZU10, L. A. G. MONARDU5, T. NATUSCHU6, H. NGANU6, H. PARKK1, R. W. POGGEU1, (THE PLANET COLLABORATION), I. PORRITTU7, I.-G. SHINK1, Y. SHVARTZVALDU10, T. G. TANU8, J. C. YEEU1, (THE µFUN COLLABORATION), F. ABEM2, D. P. BENNETTM10, I. A. BONDM3, C. S. BOTZLERM4, M. FREEMANM4, A. FUKUIM6, D. FUKUNAGAM2, Y. ITOWM2, N. KOSHIMOTOM1, C. H. LINGM3, K. MASUDAM2, Y. MATSUBARAM2, Y. MURAKIM2, S. NAMBAM1, K. OHNISHIM7, N. J. RATTENBURYM4, TO. SAITOM8, D. J. SULLIVANM5, W. L. SWEATMANM3, D. SUZUKIM1, P. J. TRISTRAMM9, N. TSURUMIM2, K. WADAM1, N. YAMAIM11, P. C. M. YOCKM4 A. YONEHARAM11 (THE MOA COLLABORATION) 1Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network, 6740 Cortona Drive, suite 102, Goleta, CA 93117, USA K1Department of Physics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 361-763, Republic of Korea R1School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK R2European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany R3SUPA, School of Physics & Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK R4Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool CH41 1LD, UK R5Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Max-Planck-Str. 2, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany R6Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute, Qatar Foundation, Tornado Tower, Floor 19, P.O. Box 5825, Doha, Qatar N1Niels Bohr Institute, Astronomical Observatory, Juliane Maries vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark N3Dipartimento di Fisica "E. R. Caianiello", Università di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II n. 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy N4International Institute for Advanced Scientific Studies (IIASS), 84019 Vietri sul Mare, (SA), Italy N5Centre for Star and Planet formation, Geological Museum, Øster Voldgade 5, 1350, Copenhagen, Denmark N2Qatar Foundation, P.O. Box 5825, Doha, Qatar N6Dept. of Physics, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box 11155-9161, Tehran, Iran N7Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK N8Institut d'Astrophysique et de Géophysique, Allée du 6 Août 17, Sart Tilman, Bât. B5c, 4000 Liége, Belgium N9Boston University, Astronomy Department, 725 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA N10Armagh Observatory, College Hill, Armagh, BT61 9DG, Northern Ireland, UK N11Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 776 Daedukdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-348, Korea N12Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, University of Manchester, Oxford Road,Manchester, M13 9PL, UK N13 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany N16INFN, Gruppo Collegato di Salerno, Sezione di Napoli, Italy N17Hamburger Sternwarte, Universität Hamburg, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany N18Istituto Internazionale per gli Alti Studi Scientifici (IIASS),84019 Vietri Sul Mare (SA), Italy N19Main Astronomical Observatory, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, vul. Akademika Zabolotnoho 27, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine O1 Warsaw University Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warszawa, Poland O2 Universidad de Concepción, Departamento de Astronomia, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile O3Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK P1University of Canterbury, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Private Bag 4800, 8020 Christchurch, New Zealand P2Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, IRAP, 31400 Toulouse, France P3CNRS, IRAP, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France P4UPMC-CNRS, UMR7095, Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France P5European Southern Observatory (ESO), Alonso de Cordova 3107, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile P6McDonald Observatory, 16120 St Hwy Spur 78 #2, Fort Davis, TX 79734, USA P7School of Math and Physics, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 37, GPO Hobart, 7001 Tasmania, Australia N14 Instituto de Astrofísica, Facultad de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, 7820436 Macul, Santiago, Chile N15Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg (ZAH), Mönchhofstr. 12-14, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany 2 A REFINED ANALYSIS OF MICROLENSING EVENT OGLE-2012-BLG-0406 P8Physics Department, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Rijeka, Omladinska 14, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia P9Technical University of Vienna, Department of Computing, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 10, Vienna, Austria P10Department of Physics & Astronomy, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA P11Laboratory for Exoplanets and Stellar Astrophysics, Mail Code 667, NASA/GSFC, Bldg 34, Room E317, Greenbelt, MD 20771 P12South African Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 9, Observatory 7935, South Africa U1Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA U2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA U3Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Yi He Yuan Road 5, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 100871, China U4Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon 305-348, Republic of Korea U5Klein Karoo Observatory, Calitzdorp, and Bronberg Observatory, Pretoria, South Africa U6Auckland Observatory, Auckland, New Zealand U7Turitea Observatory, Palmerston North, New Zealand U8Perth Exoplanet Survey Telescope, Perth, Australia U9Possum Observatory, Patutahi, Gisbourne, New Zealand U10 School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel M1Department of Earth and Space Science, Osaka University, Osaka 560-0043, Japan M2Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan M3Institute of Information and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, North Shore Mail Centre, Auckland, New Zealand M4Department of Physics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92-019, Auckland 1001, New Zealand M5School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand M6Okayama Astrophysical Observatory, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Asakuchi, Okayama 719-0232, Japan M7Nagano National College of Technology, Nagano 381-8550, Japan M8Tokyo Metropolitan College of Aeronautics, Tokyo 116-8523, Japan M9Mt. John University Observatory, P.O. Box 56, Lake Tekapo 8770, New Zealand M10University of Notre Dame, Department of Physics, 225 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556-5670, USA M11Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyoto Sangyo University, 603-8555, Kyoto, Japan ♠The RoboNet Collaboration ♦The MiNDSTEp Collaboration (cid:4)The OGLE Collaboration ‡The µFUN Collaboration ♣The PLANET Collaboration †The MOA Collaboration and ⋆Corresponding author Draft version October 10, 2018 ABSTRACT We present a detailed analysis of survey and follow-up observations of microlensing event OGLE-2012-BLG- 0406 based on data obtained from 10 different observatories. Intensive coverage of the lightcurve, especially the perturbation part, allowed us to accurately measure the parallax effect and lens orbital motion. Combining our measurement of the lens parallax with the angular Einstein radius determined from finite-source effects, we estimate the physical parameters of the lens system. We find that the event was caused by a 2.73 ± 0.43 MJ planet orbiting a 0.44 ± 0.07 M⊙ early M-type star. The distance to the lens is 4.97 ± 0.29 kpc and the projected separation between the host star and its planet at the time of the event is 3.45 ± 0.26 AU. We find that the additional coverage provided by follow-up observations, especially during the planetary perturbation, leads to a more accurate determination of the physical parameters of the lens. Subject headings: gravitational lensing -- binaries: general -- planetary systems 1. INTRODUCTION Radial velocity and transit surveys, which primarily target main-sequence stars, have already discovered hundreds of gi- ant planets and are now beginning to explore the reservoir of lower mass planets with orbit sizes extending to a few as- tronomical units (AU). These planets mostly lie well inside the snow line1 of their host stars. Meanwhile, direct imag- ing with large aperture telescopes has been discovering gi- ant planets tens to hundreds of AUs away from their stars (Kalas et al. 2005). The region of sensitivity of microlens- ing lies somewhere in between and extends to low-mass ex- oplanets lying beyond the snow-line of their low-mass host stars, between ∼1 and 10 AU (Tsapras et al. 2003; Gaudi 2012). Although there is already strong evidence that cold sub-Jovian planets are more common than originally thought ∗Royal Society University Research Fellow 1 The snow line is defined as the distance from the star in a protoplanetary disk where ice grains can form (Lecar et al. 2006). around low-mass stars (Gould et al. 2006; Sumi et al. 2010; Kains et al. 2013; Batalha et al. 2013), cold super-Jupiters or- biting K or M-dwarfs were believed to be a rarer class of ob- jects2 (Laughlin et al. 2004; Miguel et al. 2011; Cassan et al. 2012). Both gravitational instability and core accretion models of planetary formation have a hard time generating these planets, although it is possible to produce them given appropriate ini- tial conditions. The main argument against core accretion is that it takes too long to produce a massive planet but this cru- cially depends on the core mass and the opacity of the planet envelope during gas accretion. In the case of gravitational in- stability, a massive protoplanetary disc would probably have too high an opacity to fragment locally at distances of a few AU. The radial velocity method has been remarkably successful 2 although a metal-rich protoplanetary disk might allow the formation of sufficiently massive solid cores. TSAPRAS ET AL. in tabulating the part of the distribution that lies within the snow-line but discoveries of super-Jupiters beyond the snow- line of M-dwarfs have been comparatively few (Johnson et al. 2010; Montet et al. 2013). Since microlensing is most sensi- tive to planets that are further away from their host stars, typi- cally M and K dwarfs, the two techniques are complementary (Gaudi 2012). Three brown dwarf and nineteen planet microlensing dis- coveries have been published to date, including the dis- coveries of two multiple-planet systems (Gaudi et al. 2008; Han et al. 2013)3. It is also worth noting that unbound objects of planetary mass have also been reported (Sumi et al. 2011). Microlensing involves the chance alignment along an ob- server's line of sight of a foreground object (lens) and a back- ground star (source). This results in a characteristic variation of the brightness of the background source as it is being grav- itationally lensed. As seen from the Earth, the brightness of the source increases as it approaches the lens, reaching a max- imum value at the time of closest approach. The brightness then decreases again as the source moves away from the lens. In microlensing events, planets orbiting the lens star can reveal their presence through distortions in the otherwise smoothly varying standard single lens lightcurve. Together, the host star and planet constitute a binary lens. Binary lenses have a magnification pattern that is more complex than the single lens case due to the presence of extended caustics that represent the positions on the source plane at which the lens- ing magnification diverges. Distortions in the lightcurve arise when the trajectory of the source star approaches (or crosses) the caustics (Mao and Paczy´nski 1991). Recent reviews of the method can be found in Dominik (2010) and Gaudi (2011). Upgrades to the OGLE4 (Udalski 2003) survey observing setup and MOA5 (Sumi et al. 2003) microlensing survey tele- scope in the past couple of years brought greater precision and enhanced observing cadence, resulting in an increased rate of exoplanet discoveries. For example, OGLE has reg- ularly been monitoring the field of the OGLE-2012-BLG- 0406 event since March 2010 with a cadence of 55 minutes. When a microlensing alert was issued notifying the astro- nomical community that event OGLE-2012-BLG-0406 was exhibiting anomalous behavior, intense follow-up observa- tions from multiple observatories around the world were ini- tiated in order to better characterize the deviation. This event was first analyzed by Poleski et al. (2013) using exclusively the OGLE-IV survey photometry. That study concluded that the event was caused by a planetary system consisting of a 3.9±1.2 MJ planet orbiting a low mass late K/early M dwarf. In this paper we present the analysis of the event based on the combined data obtained from 10 different telescopes, spread out in longitude, providing dense and continuous cov- erage of the lightcurve. The paper is structured as follows: Details of the discov- ery of this event, follow-up observations and image analysis procedures are described in Section 2. Section 3 presents the methodology of modeling the features of the lightcurve. We provide a summary and conclude in Section 4. 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA Microlensing event OGLE-2012-BLG-0406 was discov- ered at equatorial coordinates α = 17h53m18.17s, δ = 3 For a complete list consult http://exoplanet.eu/catalog/ and references therein. 4 http://ogle.astrouw.edu.pl 5 http://www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/moa 3 - 30◦28′16.2′′ (J2000.0)6 by the OGLE-IV survey and an- nounced by their Early Warning System (EWS)7 on the 6th of April 2012. The event had a baseline I-band magnitude of 16.35 and was gradually increasing in brightness. The pre- dicted maximum magnification at the time of announcement was low, therefore the event was considered a low-priority target for most follow-up teams who preferentially observe high-magnification events as they are associated with a higher probability of detecting planets (Griest and Safizadeh 1998). OGLE observations of the event were carried out with the 1.3-m Warsaw telescope at the Las Campanas Observatory, Chile, equipped with the 32 chip mosaic camera. The event's field was visited every 55 minutes providing very dense and precise coverage of the entire light curve from the baseline, back to the baseline. For more details on the OGLE data and coverage see Poleski et al. (2013). An assessment of data acquired by the OGLE team un- the 1st of July (08:47 UT, HJD∼2456109.87) which til was carried out by the SIGNALMEN anomaly detector (Dominik et al. 2007) on the 2nd of July (02:19 UT) con- cluded that a microlensing anomaly, i.e. a deviation from the standard bell-shaped Paczy´nski curve (Paczy´nski 1986), was in progress. This was electronically communicated via the ARTEMiS (Automated Robotic Terrestrial Exoplanet Microlensing Search) system (Dominik et al. 2008) to trig- ger prompt observations by both the RoboNet-II8 collabo- ration (Tsapras et al. 2009) and the MiNDSTEp9 consortium (Dominik 2010). RoboNet's web-PLOP system (Horne et al. 2009) reacted to the trigger by scheduling observations al- ready from the 2nd of July (02:30 UT), just 11 minutes af- ter the SIGNALMEN assessment started. However, the first RoboNet observations did not occur before the 4th of July (15:26 UT), when the event was observed with the FTS. This delayed response was due to the telescopes being offline for engineering work and bad weather at the observing sites. It fell to the Danish 1.54m at ESO La Silla to provide the first data point following the anomaly alert (2nd of July, 03:42 UT) as part of the MiNDSTEp efforts. The alert also triggered au- tomated anomaly modeling by RTModel (Bozza 2010), which by the 2nd of July (04:22 UT) delivered a rather broad variety of solutions in the stellar binary or planetary range, reflecting the fact that the true nature was not well-constrained by the data available at that time. This process chain did not involve any human interaction at all. The first human involvement was an e-mail circulated to all microlensing teams by V. Bozza on the 2nd of July (07:26 UT) informing the community about the ongoing anomaly and modeling results. Including OGLE data from a subsequent night, the apparent anomaly was also independently spotted by E. Bachelet (e-mail by D.P. Bennett of 3rd July, 13:42 UT), and subsequently PLANET10 team (Beaulieu et al. 2006) SAAO data as well as µFUN11 (Gould et al. 2006) SMARTS (CTIO) data were acquired the coming night, which along with the RoboNet FTS data cover the main peak of the anomaly. It should be noted that the observers at CTIO de- cided to follow the event even while the moon was full in order to obtain crucial data. A model circulated by T. Sumi 6 (l, b) = - 0.46◦,- 2.22◦ 7 http://ogle.astrouw.edu.pl/ogle4/ews/ews.html 8 http://robonet.lcogt.net 9 http://www.mindstep-science.org 10 http://planet.iap.fr 11 http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/∼microfun 4 A REFINED ANALYSIS OF MICROLENSING EVENT OGLE-2012-BLG-0406 TABLE 1. OBSERVATIONS group OGLE RoboNet RoboNet RoboNet MiNDSTEp MOA µFUN PLANET PLANET WISE telescope passband data points 1.3m Warsaw Telescope, Las Campanas Observatory (LCO), Chile 2.0m Faulkes North Telescope (FTN), Haleakala, Hawaii, USA 2.0m Faulkes South Telescope (FTS), Siding Spring Observatory (SSO), Australia 2.0m Liverpool Telescope (LT), La Palma, Spain 1.5m Danish Telescope, La Silla, Chile 0.6m Boller & Chivens (B&C), Mt. John, New Zealand 1.3m SMARTS, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO), Chile 1.0m Elizabeth Telescope, South African Astronomical Observatory (SAAO), South Africa 1.0m Canopus Telescope, Mt. Canopus Observatory, Tasmania, Australia 1.0m Wise Telescope, Wise Observatory, Israel I I I I I I V , I I I I 3013 83 121 131 473 1856 16, 81 226 210 180 on the 5th of July (00:38 UT) did not distinguish between the various solutions. However, when the rapidly changing features of the anomaly were independently assessed by the Chungbuk Na- tional University group (CBNU, C. Han), the community was informed on the 5th of July (10:43 UT) that the anomaly is very likely due to the presence of a planetary companion. An independent modeling run by V. Bozza's automatic soft- ware (5th of July, 10:55 UT) confirmed the result. While the OGLE collaboration (A. Udalski) notified observers on the 5th of July that a caustic exit was occurring, a geometry leading to a further small peak successively emerged from the mod- els. D.P. Bennett circulated a model using updated data on the 6th of July (00:14 UT) which highlighted the presence of a second prominent feature expected to occur ∼10th of July. Another modeling run performed at CBNU on the 7th of July (02:39 UT) also identified this feature and estimated that the secondary peak would occur on the 11th of July. Follow-up teams continued to monitor the progress of the event intensively until the beginning of September, well after the planetary deviation had ceased, and provided dense cov- erage of the main peak of the event. A preliminary model using available OGLE and follow-up data at the time, circu- lated on the 31st of October (C. Han, J.-Y. Choi), classified the companion to the lens as a super-Jupiter. Poleski et al. (2013) presented an analysis of this event using reprocessed survey data exclusively. In this paper we present a refined analysis using survey and follow-up data together. The groups that contributed to the observations of this event, along with the telescopes used, are listed in Table 1. Most observations were obtained in the I-band and some im- ages were also taken in other bands in order to create a color- magnitude diagram and classify the source star. We note that there are also observations obtained from the MOA 1.8m survey telescope which we did not include in our modeling because the target was very close to the edge of the CCD. We also do not include data from the µFUN Auckland 0.4m, PEST 0.3m, Possum 0.36m and Turitea 0.36m telescopes due to poor observing conditions at site. Extracting accurate photometry from observations of crowded fields, such as the Galactic Bulge, is a challenging process. Each image contains thousands of stars whose stellar point-spread functions (PSFs) often overlap so aperture and PSF-fitting photometry can at best offer limited precision. In order to optimize the photometry it is necessary to use differ- ence imaging (DI) techniques (Alard and Lupton 1998). For any particular telescope/camera combination, DI uses a refer- ence image of the event taken under optimal seeing conditions which is then degraded to match the seeing conditions of ev- ery other image of the event taken from that telescope. The degraded reference image is then subtracted from the match- ing image to produce a residual (or difference) image. Stars that have not varied in brightness in the time interval between the two images will cancel, leaving no systematic residuals on the difference image but variable stars will leave either a positive or negative residual. DI is the preferred method of photometric analysis among microlensing groups and each group has developed custom pipelines to reduce their observations. OGLE and MOA im- ages were reduced using the pipelines described in Udalski (2003) and Bond et al. (2001) respectively. PLANET, µFUN, and WISE images were processed using variants of the PySIS (Albrow et al. 2009) pipeline, whereas RoboNet and MiND- STEp observations were analyzed using customized versions of the DanDIA package (Bramich 2008). Once the source star returned to its baseline magnitude, each data set was repro- cessed to optimize photometric precision. These photometri- cally optimized data sets were used as input for our modeling run. 3. MODELING Figure 1 shows the lightcurve of OGLE-2012-BLG-406. The lightcurve displays two main features that deviate sig- nificantly from the standard Paczy´nski curve. The first fea- ture, which peaked at HJD ∼ 2456112 (3rd of July), is pro- duced by the source trajectory grazing the cusp of a caustic. The brightness then quickly drops as the source moves away from the cusp (Schneider & Weiss 1992; Zakharov 1995), in- creases again for a brief period as it passes close to another cusp at HJD ∼ 2456121 (12th of July), and eventually returns to the standard shape as the source moves further away from the caustic structure. The anomalous behavior, when both fea- tures are considered, lasts for a total of ∼ 15 days, while the full duration of the event is &120 days. These are typical lightcurve features expected from lensing phenomena involv- ing planetary lenses. We begin our analysis by exploring a standard set of solu- tions that involve modeling the event as a static binary lens. The Paczy´nski curve representing the evolution of the event for most of its duration is described by three parameters: the time of closest approach between the projected position of the source on the lens plane and the position of the lens photo- center12, t0, the minimum impact parameter of the source, u0, 12 The "photocenter" refers to the center of the lensing magnification pat- tern. For a binary-lens with a projected separation between the lens compo- nents less than the Einstein radius of the lens, the photocenter corresponds to the center of mass. For a lens with a separation greater than the Einstein radius, there exist two photocenters each of which is located close to each TSAPRAS ET AL. 5 FIG. 1. -- Lightcurve of OGLE-2012-BLG-0406 showing our best-fit binary-lens model including parallax and orbital motion. The legend on the right of the figure lists the contributing telescopes. All data were taken in the I-band, except where otherwise indicated. parameters standard parallax u0 > 0 u0 < 0 u0 > 0 orbit u0 < 0 TABLE 2. LENSING PARAMETERS orbit+parallax u0 > 0 u0 < 0 χ2/dof t0 (HJD') u0 tE (days) s q (10- 3) α ρ∗ (10- 2) πE,N πE,E ds/dt (yr- 1) dα/dt (yr- 1) 6921.019/6383 6141.63 ± 0.04 0.532 ± 0.001 62.37 ± 0.06 1.346 ± 0.001 5.33 ± 0.04 0.852 ± 0.001 1.103 ± 0.008 -- -- -- -- 6850.358/6381 6141.70 ± 0.05 0.527 ± 0.001 63.75 ± 0.18 1.345 ± 0.001 5.07 ± 0.03 0.864 ± 0.002 1.053 ± 0.007 0.118 ± 0.011 -0.033 ± 0.007 -- -- 6677.685/6381 6141.66 ± 0.05 -0.520 ± 0.001 69.39 ± 0.32 1.341 ± 0.001 4.45 ± 0.04 -0.906 ± 0.002 0.968 ± 0.009 -0.414 ± 0.016 -0.069 ± 0.009 -- -- 6408.371/6381 6141.24 ± 0.05 0.500 ± 0.002 65.33 ± 0.20 1.300 ± 0.002 6.97 ± 0.27 0.861 ± 0.002 1.233 ± 0.031 -- -- 0.765 ± 0.046 1.284 ± 0.159 6408.255/6381 6141.28 ± 0.04 -0.499 ± 0.002 65.53 ± 0.15 1.301 ± 0.001 6.63 ± 0.05 -0.859 ± 0.001 1.194 ± 0.011 -- -- 0.727 ± 0.017 -1.108 ± 0.019 6357.680/6379 6141.33 ± 0.05 0.496 ± 0.002 64.77 ± 0.19 1.301 ± 0.002 5.92 ± 0.11 0.837 ± 0.002 1.111 ± 0.014 -0.143 ± 0.018 0.047 ± 0.007 0.669 ± 0.028 0.497 ± 0.059 6381.358/6379 6141.19 ± 0.06 -0.497 ± 0.002 61.91 ± 0.42 1.296 ± 0.002 6.82 ± 0.19 -0.810 ± 0.005 1.207 ± 0.023 0.358 ± 0.042 0.008 ± 0.006 0.802 ± 0.033 -0.732 ± 0.085 NOTE. -- HJD'=HJD-2450000. expressed in units of the angular Einstein radius of the lens (θE), and the duration of time, tE (the Einstein time-scale), re- quired for the source to cross θE. The binary nature of the lens requires the introduction of three extra parameters: The mass ratio q between the two components of the lens, their pro- jected separation s, expressed in units of θE, and the source trajectory angle α with respect to the axis defined by the two components of the lens. A seventh parameter, ρ∗, representing the source radius normalized by the angular Einstein radius is also required to account for finite-source effects that are lens component with an offset q/[s(1 + q)] toward the other lens component (Kim et al. 2009). In this case, the reference t0, u0 measurement is obtained from the photocenter to which the source trajectory approaches closest. important when the source trajectory approaches or crosses a caustic (Ingrosso et al. 2009). The magnification pattern produced by binary lenses is very sensitive to variations in s,q, which are the parameters that affect the shape and orientation of the caustics, and α, the source trajectory angle. Even small changes in these param- eters can produce extreme changes in magnification as they may result in the trajectory of the source approaching or cross- ing a caustic (Dong et al. 2006, 2009). On the other hand, changes in the other parameters cause the overall magnifica- tion pattern to vary smoothly. To assess how the magnification pattern depends on the pa- rameters, we start the modeling run by performing a hybrid 6 A REFINED ANALYSIS OF MICROLENSING EVENT OGLE-2012-BLG-0406 search in parameter space whereby we explore a grid of s,q, α values and optimize t0,u0,tE and ρ∗ at each grid point by χ2 minimization using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). Our grid limits are set at - 1 ≤ logs ≤ 1, - 5 ≤ log q ≤ 1, and 0 ≤ α < 2π, which are wide enough to guarantee that all local minima in parameter space have been identified. An initial MCMC run provides a map of the topology of the χ2 surface, which is subsequently further refined by gradually narrow- ing down the grid parameter search space (Shin et al. 2012a; Street et al. 2013). Once we know the approximate locations of the local minima, we perform a χ2 optimization using all seven parameters at each of those locations in order to deter- mine the refined position of the minimum. From this set of local minima, we identify the location of the global minimum and check for the possible existence of degenerate solutions. We find no other solutions. FIG. 2. -- The bottom panel zooms-in on the anomalous region of the lightcurve presented in Figure 1. At the top panel we display the source tra- jectory, color coded for the individual contributions of each observatory, and caustic structure at two different times corresponding to the first and sec- ond peaks of the anomaly. All scales are normalized by θE, and the size of the circles corresponds to the size of the source. The first peak deviates the strongest. This is a result of the trajectory of the source grazing the cusp of the caustic at t1 (HJD∼2456112), shown in red. The second deviation at t2 (HJD∼2456121) is significantly weaker and is due to the source trajectory passing close to another cusp of the caustic, shown in blue. The differences in the shape of the caustic shown at t1 and t2 are due to the orbital motion of the lens-planet system. Since our analysis relies on data sets obtained from dif- ferent telescopes and instruments which use different esti- mates for the reported photometric precision, we normalize the flux uncertainties of each data set by adjusting them as + σ2 ei = fi(σ2 i )1/2, where fi is a scale factor, σ0 are the orig- 0 inally reported uncertainties and σi is an additive uncertainty term for each data set i. The rescaling ensures that χ2 per de- gree of freedom (χ2/dof) for each data set relative to the model becomes unity. Data points with very large uncertainties and obvious outliers are also removed in the process. In computing finite-source magnifications, we take into ac- count the limb-darkening of the source by modeling the sur- face brightness as Sλ(ϑ) ∝ 1 - Γλ(1 - 1.5 cosϑ) (Albrow et al. 2001), where ϑ is the angle between the line of sight toward the source star and the normal to the source surface, and Γλ is the limb-darkening coefficient in passband λ. We adopt ΓV = 0.74 and ΓI = 0.53 from the Claret (2000) tables. These values are based on our classification of the stellar type of the source, as subsequently described. The residuals contained additional smooth structure that the static binary model did not account for. This indicated the need to consider additional second-order effects. The event lasted for & 120 days, so the positional change of the ob- server caused by the orbital motion of the Earth around the Sun may have affected the lensing magnification. This intro- duces subtle long-term perturbations in the event lightcurve by causing the apparent lens-source motion to deviate from a rectilinear trajectory (Gould 1992; Alcock et al. 1995). Mod- eling this parallax effect requires the introduction of two ex- tra parameters, πE,N and πE,E, representing the components of the parallax vector πE projected on the sky along the north and east equatorial axes respectively. When parallax effects are included in the model, we use the geocentric formalism of Gould et al. (2004) which ensures that the parameters t0, u0 and tE will be almost the same as when the event is fitted without parallax. An additional effect that needs to be considered is the or- bital motion of the lens system. The lens orbital motion causes the shape of the caustics to vary with time. To a first or- der approximation, the orbital effect can be modeled by intro- ducing two extra parameters that represent the rate of change of the normalized separation between the two lensing com- ponents ds/dt and the rate of change of the source trajectory angle relative to the caustics dα/dt (Albrow et al. 2000). We conduct further modeling considering each of the higher-order effects separately and also model their combined effect. Furthermore, for each run considering a higher-order effect, we test models with u0 > 0 and u0 < 0 that form a pair of degenerate solutions resulting from the mirror-image sym- metry of the source trajectory with respect to the binary-lens axis. For each model, we repeat our calculations starting from different initial positions in parameter space to verify that the fits converge to our previous solution and that there are no other possible minima. Table 2 lists the optimized parameters for the models we considered. We find that higher-order effects contribute strongly to the shape of the lightcurve. The model includ- ing the parallax effect provides a better fit than the standard model by ∆χ2 = 243.3. The orbital effect also improves the fit by ∆χ2 = 512.8. The combination of both parallax and orbital effects improves the fit by ∆χ2 = 563.3. Due to the u0 > 0 and u0 < 0 degeneracy, there are two solutions for the orbital mo- tion + parallax model which have similar χ2 values. Models involving the xallarap effect (source orbital motion) were also considered but they did not outperform equivalent models in- volving only parallax. In Figure 1, we present the best-fit model lightcurve super- posed on the observed data. Figure 2 displays an enlarged TSAPRAS ET AL. 7 view of the perturbation region of the lightcurve along with the source trajectory with respect to the caustic. The follow- up observations cover critical features of the perturbation re- gions that were not covered by the survey data. We note that the caustic varies with time and thus we present the shape of the caustic at the times of the first (t1=HJD∼2456112) and second perturbations (t2=HJD∼2456121). The source trajec- tory grazes the caustic structure at t1 causing a substantial in- crease in magnification. As the caustic structure and trajec- tory evolve with time, the trajectory approaches another cusp at t2, but does not cross it. This second approach causes an in- crease in magnification which is appreciably lower than that of the first encounter at t1. The source trajectory is curved due to the combination of the parallax and orbital effects. The mass and distance to the lens are determined by Mtot = θE κπE ; DL = AU πEθE + πS , (1) where κ = 4G/(c2AU) and πS is the parallax of the source star (Gould 1992). To determine these physical quantities we require the values of πE and θE. Modeling the event returns the value of πE, whereas θE = θ∗/ρ∗ depends on the angular radius of the source star, θ∗, and the normalized source ra- dius, ρ∗, which is also returned from modeling (see Table 2). Therefore, determining θE requires an estimate of θ∗. To estimate the angular source radius, we use the stan- dard method described in Yoo et al. (2004). In this proce- dure we first measure the dereddened color and brightness of the source star by using the centroid of the giant clump as a reference because its dereddened magnitude I0,c = 14.45 (Nataf et al. 2013) and color (V - I)0,c = 1.06 (Bensby et al. 2011) are already known. For this calibration, we use a color- magnitude diagram obtained from CTIO observations in the I and V bands. We then convert the V - I source color to V - K using the color-color relations from Bessell and Brett (1988) and the source radius is obtained from the θ∗-(V - K) relations of Kervella et al. (2004). We derive the dereddened magnitude and color of the source star as I0 = 14.62 and (V - I)0 = 1.12 respectively. This confirms that the source star is an early K-type giant. The estimated angular source radius is θ∗ = 5.94 ± 0.51 µas. Combining this with our evaluation of ρ∗, we obtain θE = 0.53 ± 0.05 mas for the angular Einstein radius of the lens. Our analysis is consistent with the results of Poleski et al. (2013). We confirm that the lens is a planetary system com- posed of a giant planet orbiting a low-mass star and we report the refined parameters of the system. Poleski et al. (2013) re- ported that there existed a pair of degenerate solutions with u0 > 0 and u0 < 0, although the positive u0 solution is slightly preferred with ∆χ2 = 13.6. We find a consistent result that the positive u0 solution is preferred but the degeneracy is bet- ter discriminated by ∆χ2 = 23.7. The error contours of the parallax parameters for the best-fit model are presented in Figure 3. The uncertainty of each pa- rameter is determined from the distribution of MCMC chain, and the reported uncertainty corresponds to the standard devi- ation of the distribution. We list the physical parameters of the system in Table 3 and their posterior probability distributions are shown in Figure 4. The lens lies DL = 4.97 ± 0.29 kpc away in the direction of the Galactic Bulge. The more massive component of the lens has mass M⋆ = 0.44 ± 0.07 M⊙ so it is an early M-type dwarf star and its companion is a super-Jupiter planet with a mass Mp = 2.73 ± 0.43 MJ. The projected separation between FIG. 3. -- ∆χ2 contours for the parallax parameters derived from our MCMC fits for the best binary-lens model including orbital motion and the parallax effect. TABLE 3. PHYSICAL PARAMETERS parameters quantity Mass of the host star (M⋆) Mass of the planet (Mp) Distance to the lens (DL) Projected star-planet separation (d⊥) Einstein radius (θE) Geocentric proper motion (µGeo) 0.44 ± 0.07 M⊙ 2.73 ± 0.43 MJ 4.97 ± 0.29 kpc 3.45 ± 0.26 AU 0.53 ± 0.05 milli-arcsec 3.02 ± 0.26 milli-arcsec yr- 1 the two components of the lens is d⊥ = 3.45 ± 0.26 AU. The geocentric relative proper motion between the lens and the source is µGeo = θE/tE = 3.02 ± 0.26 milli-arcsec yr- 1. In the Heliocentric frame, the proper motion is µHelio = (µN, µE) = (- 2.91 ± 0.26,1.31 ± 0.16) milli-arcsec yr- 1. We note that the derived physical lens parameters are some- what different from those of Poleski et al. (2013). Specifi- cally, the mass of the host star derived in Poleski et al. (2013) is 0.59 M⊙, which is ∼ 34% greater than our estimate. Half of this difference comes from the slightly larger Einstein ra- dius obtained by Poleski et al. (2013) from the OGLE-IV pho- tometry and the remaining part from the slightly larger πE,N component of the parallax obtained from modeling the sur- vey and follow-up photometry as presented in this paper. It should be noted that the parameters derived by both our and thePoleski et al. (2013) models are consistent within the 1-σ level. To further check the consistency between our model and that of Poleski et al. (2013), we conducted additional mod- eling based on different combinations of data sets. We first test a model based on OGLE data exclusively in order to see whether we can retrieve the physical parameters reported in Poleski et al. (2013). From this modeling, we derive physi- cal parameters consistent with those of Poleski et al. (2013), indicating that the differences are due to the additional cov- 8 A REFINED ANALYSIS OF MICROLENSING EVENT OGLE-2012-BLG-0406 FIG. 4. -- The physical parameter uncertainties pertaining to the lens as derived from the MCMC runs optimizing our binary-lens model including parallax and orbital motion for the u0 > 0 trajectory. mass star discovered by microlensing (Dong et al. 2009; Batista et al. 2011; Yee et al. 2012) and the first such system whose characteristics were derived solely from microlensing data, without considering any external information. erage provided by the follow-up observations. We conducted another modeling run using OGLE observations but also in- cluded CTIO, FTS and SAAO data, i.e. those datasets cover- ing the anomalous peak. This modeling run resulted in phys- ical parameters that are consistent with the values extracted from fitting all combined data together, as reported in this pa- per. This indicates that the differences between Poleski et al. (2013) and this analysis, although consistent within the 1-σ level, come mainly from follow-up data that provide better coverage of the perturbation. Therefore, using survey and follow-up data together, we arrive at a more accurate deter- mination of the ρ and πE,N parameters, which leads to a re- finement of the physical parameters of the planetary system. 4. CONCLUSIONS Microlensing event OGLE-2012-BLG-0406 was inten- sively observed by survey and follow-up groups using 10 dif- ferent telescopes around the world. Anomalous deviations ob- served in the lightcurve were recognized to be due to the pres- ence of a planetary companion even before the event reached its central peak. The anomalous behavior was first identified and assessed automatically via software agents. Most follow- up teams responded to these alerts by adjusting their observ- ing strategies accordingly. This highlights the importance of circulating early models to the astronomical community that help to identify important targets for follow-up observations (Shin et al. 2012b). There are ∼100 follow-up alerts circu- lated annually, ∼10% of which turn out to be planet candi- dates. Our analysis of the combined data is consistent with the results of Poleski et al. (2013) and we report the refined pa- rameters of the system. We find that this refinement is mainly due to follow-up observations over the anomaly. The primary lens with mass M⋆ = 0.44 ± 0.07 M⊙ is orbited by a planetary companion with mass Mp = 2.73 ± 0.43 MJ at a projected sep- aration of d⊥ = 3.45 ± 0.26 AU. The distance to the system is DL = 4.97 ± 0.29 kpc in the direction of the Galactic Bulge. This is the fourth cold super-Jupiter planet around a low- Microlensing is currently the only way to obtain high pre- cision mass measurements for this type of system. Radial ve- locity, in addition to the msin i degeneracy, at present does not have long enough data streams to measure the parame- ters of such systems. However, recently Montet et al. (2013) have developed a promising new method to discover them us- ing a combination of radial velocity and direct imaging. They identify long term trends in radial velocity data and use adap- tive optics imaging to rule out the possibility that these are due to stars. This means that the trends are either due to large planets or brown dwarfs. This approach does not yield precise characterization but provides important statistical in- formation. Their results are consistent with gravitational mi- crolensing estimates of planet abundance in that region of pa- rameter space. The precise mechanism of how such large planets form and evolve around low mass stars is still an open question. Ra- dial velocity and transit surveys have been finding massive gas-giant planets around FGK-stars for years (Batalha et al. 2013) but these stars have protoplanetary disks that are suffi- ciently massive to allow the formation of super-Jupiter plan- ets. On the other hand, protoplanetary disks around M-dwarfs have masses of only a few Jupiter mass so massive gas giants should be relatively hard to produce (Apai 2013). Recent observational studies have revealed that protoplan- etary disks are as common around low mass stars as higher- mass stars (Williams & Cieza 2011), arguing for the same for- mation processes. In addition, there is mounting evidence, but not yet conclusive, that disks last much longer around low- mass stars (Apai 2013). Longer disk lifetimes may be con- ducive to the formation of super-Jupiters. The microlensing discoveries suggest that giant planets around low-mass stars may be as common as around higher-mass stars but may not undergo significant migration (Gould et al. 2010). TSAPRAS ET AL. 9 Simulations using the core accretion formalism can produce such planets within reasonable disk lifetimes of a few Myr (Mordasini et al. 2012) provided the core mass is sufficiently large or the opacity of the planet envelope during gas accre- tion is decreased by assuming that the dust grains have grown to larger sizes than the typical interstellar values (R. Nelson, private communication). Furthermore, gravitational instabil- ity models of planet formation can also potentially produce such objects when the opacity of the protoplanetary disk is low enough to allow local fragmentation at greater distances from the host star, and subsequently migrating the planet to distances of a few AU. It is worth noting that highly magnified microlensing events involving extended stellar sources may produce appreciable polarization signals (Ingrosso et al. 2012). If such signals are observed during a microlensing event, they can be combined with photometric observations to place further constraints on the lensing geometry and physical properties of the lens. YT thanks the CBNU group for their advice and hospi- tality while in Korea. DMB, MD, KH, CS, RAS, KAA, MH and YT are supported by NPRP grant NPRP-09-476- 1-78 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). CS received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) un- der grant agreement no. 268421. KH is supported by a Royal Society Leverhulme Trust Senior Research Fellow- ship. JPB and PF acknowledge the financial support of Pro- gramme National de PlanÃl'tologie and of IAP. The OGLE project has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Frame- work Programme (FP7/2007-2013) / ERC grant agreement no. 246678 to AU. Work by CH was supported by Cre- ative Research Initiative Program (2009-0081561) of Na- tional Research Foundation of Korea. The MOA experiment was supported by grants JSPS22403003 and JSPS23340064. TS acknowledges the support JSPS24253004. TS is sup- ported by the grant JSPS23340044. TCH acknowledges support from KRCF via the KRCF Young Scientist Fellow- ship program and financial support from KASI grant num- ber 2013-9-400-00. YM acknowledges support from JSPS grants JSPS23540339 and JSPS19340058. AG and BSG ac- knowledge support from NSF AST-1103471. MR acknowl- edges support from FONDECYT postdoctoral fellowship No3120097. BSG, AG, and RWP acknowledge support from NASA grant NNX12AB99G. YD, AE and JS acknowledge support from the Communaute francaise de Belgique - Ac- tions de recherche concertees - Academie Wallonie-Europe. This work is based in part on data collected by MiNDSTEp with the Danish 1.54m telescope at the ESO La Silla Obser- vatory. The Danish 1.54m telescope is operated based on a grant from the Danish Natural Science Foundation (FNU). REFERENCES Alard, C. & Lupton, R. H. 1998, ApJ, 503, 325 Albrow, M. D., An, J., Beaulieu, J.-P., et al. 2001, ApJ, 549, 759 Albrow, M. D., Beaulieu, J.-P., Caldwell, J. A. R., et al. 2000, ApJ, 534, 894 Albrow, M. D., Horne, K., Bramich, D. M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 2099 Alcock, C., Allsman, R. A., Alves, D., et al. 1995, ApJ, 454, 125 Apai, D., 2013, Astronomische Nachrichten, 334, 57 Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2013, ApJS, 204, 24 Batista, V., Gould, A., Dieters, S., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, 102 Beaulieu, J.-P., Bennett, D. P., Fouqué, P., et al. 2006, Nature, 439, 437 Bensby, T., Adén, D., Meléndez, J., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A134 Bessell, M. S. & Brett, J. M. 1988, PASP, 100, 1134 Bond, I. A., Abe, F., Dodd, R. J., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 868 Bozza, V. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 2188 Bramich, D. M. 2008, MNRAS, 386, L77 Cassan, A., Kubas, D., Beaulieu, J.-P., et al. 2012, Nature, 481, 167 Claret, A. 2000, A&A, 363, 1081 Kim, D., & Han, C., & Park, B.-J. 2009, JKAS, 42, 39 Dominik, M. 2010, Generay Relativity and Gravitation, 42, 9 Dominik, M., Horne, K., Allan, A., et al. 2008, Astronomische Nachrichten, Dominik, M., Jørgensen, U. G., Rattenbury, N. J., et al. 2010, Astronomische 329, 248 Nachrichten, 331, 671 Dominik, M., Rattenbury, N.J., Allan, A., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 792 Dong, S., Bond, I. A., Gould, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1826 Dong, S., DePoy, D. L., Gaudi, B. S., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 842 Dong, S., Gould, A., Udalski, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 695, 970 Gaudi, B. S. 2011, Exoplanets (book), 79 Gaudi, B. S. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 411 Gaudi, B. S., Bennett, D. P., Udalski, A., et al. 2008, Science, 319, 927 Gould, A. 1992, ApJ, 392, 442 Gould, A. 2004, ApJ, 606, 319 Gould, A., Udalski, A., An, D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, L37 Gould, A., Dong, S., Gaudi, B. S., et al 2010, ApJ, 720, 1073 Griest, K., & Safizadeh, N. 1998, ApJ, 500, 37 Han, C., Udalski, A., Choi, J.-Y., et al. 2013, ApJ, 762, 28 Horne, K., Snodgrass, C., Tsapras, Y., 2009, MNRAS, 396, 2087 Ingrosso, G., Novati, S. Calchi, de Paolis, F., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1496 Ingrosso, G., Novati, S. Calchi, de Paolis, F., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 219 Johnson, J. A., Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2010, PASP, 122, 149 Kains, N., Street, R. A., Choi, J.-Y., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, 70 Kalas, P. Graham, J. R., Clampin, M. 2005, Nature, 435, 1067 Kervella, P., Bersier, D. Mourard, D. et al. 2004, A&A, 428, 587 Laughlin, G., Bodenheimer, P., Adams, F. C. 2004, ApJ, 612, 73 Lecar, M., Podolak, M., Sasselov, D., Chiang, E. 2006, ApJ, 640, 1115 Mao, S., & Paczy´nski, B. 1991, ApJ, 374, L37 Miguel, Y., Guilera, O. M., Brunini, A., 2011, MNRAS, 417, 314 Montet, B. T., Crepp, J. R., Johnson, J. A., et al. 2013, ApJ, submitted Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Benz, W., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, 112 Nataf, D. M., Gould, A., Fouqué, P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 88 Paczy´nski, B. 1986, ApJ, 304, 1 Poleski, R., Udalski, A., Dong, S., et al. 2013, ApJ, submitted Schneider, P. & Weiss, A. 1992, A&A, 260, 1 Shin, I.-G., Choi, J.-Y., Park, S.-Y., et al. 2012, ApJ, 746, 127 Shin, I.-G., Han, C., Gould, A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 116 Street, R., Choi, J.-Y., Tsapras, Y., et al. 2013, ApJ, 763, 67 Sumi, T., Abe, F., Bond, I. A., et al. 2003, ApJ, 591, 204 Sumi, T., Bennett, D. P., Bond, I. A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 710, 1641 Sumi, T., Kamiya, K., Bennett, D. P., et al. 2011, Nature, 473, 349 Tsapras, Y., Horne, K., Kane, S., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 1131 Tsapras, Y., Street, R., Horne, K., et al. 2009, Astronomische Nachrichten, 330, 4 Udalski, A. 2003, Acta Astron., 53, 291 Williams, P. W., Cieza, A. L., 2011, ARA&A, 49, 67 Yee, J., Shvartzvald, Y., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 775, 102 Yoo, J., DePoy, D. L., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2004, ApJ, 603, 139 Zakharov, A. F. 1995, A&A, 293, 1
1810.05418	2	1810	2018-12-10T00:18:12	Nightside Winds at the Lower Clouds of Venus with Akatsuki/IR2: Longitudinal, local time and decadal variations from comparison with previous measurements	[ "astro-ph.EP", "physics.ao-ph" ]	We present measurements of the wind speeds at the nightside lower clouds of Venus from observations by JAXA's mission Akatsuki during 2016, complemented with new wind measurements from ground-based observations acquired with TNG/NICS in 2012 and IRTF/SpeX in 2015 and 2017. Zonal and meridional components of the winds were measured from cloud tracking on a total of 466 Akatsuki images of Venus acquired by the camera IR2 using the 2.26-$\mathrm{\mu m}$ filter, with spatial resolutions ranging 10--80 km per pixel and covering from 2016 March 22 to October 31. More than 149,000 wind vectors were obtained with an automatic technique of template matching, and 2,947 wind vectors were inferred with the manual procedure. The meridional profiles for both components of the winds are found to be consistent with results from the Venus Express mission during 2006--2008, although stronger wind variability is found for the zonal component at equatorial latitudes where Akatsuki observations have better viewing geometry than Venus Express. The zonal winds at low latitudes also suggest a zonal variability that could be associated with solar tides or vertically propagating orographic waves. Finally, the combination of our wind measurements from TNG/NICS, IRTF/SpeX and Akatsuki images with previously published and based in data from 1978 to 2017 suggests variations of up to 30 m s$^{-1}$ in the winds at the lower clouds of the Venus nightside.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version December 11, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 8 1 0 2 c e D 0 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 8 1 4 5 0 . 0 1 8 1 : v i X r a NIGHTSIDE WINDS AT THE LOWER CLOUDS OF VENUS WITH AKATSUKI/IR2: LONGITUDINAL, LOCAL TIME AND DECADAL VARIATIONS FROM COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS MEASUREMENTS. Javier Peralta,1 Keishiro Muto,2 Ricardo Hueso,3 Takeshi Horinouchi,4 Agust´ın S´anchez-Lavega,3 Shin-ya Murakami,1 Pedro Machado,5 Eliot F. Young,6 Yeon Joo Lee,2 Toru Kouyama,7 Hideo Sagawa,8 Kevin McGouldrick,9 Takehiko Satoh,1, 10 Takeshi Imamura,2 Sanjay S. Limaye,11 Takao M. Sato,12, 1 Kazunori Ogohara,13 Masato Nakamura,1 and David Luz5 1Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) 3-1-1, Yoshinodai, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-5210, Japan 2Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Japan 3Escuela de Ingenier´ıa de Bilbao (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Spain 4Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 5Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences, Portugal 6Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302, USA 7Artificial Intelligence Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan 8Faculty of Science, Kyoto Sangyo University, Japan 9Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303-7814, USA 10Department of Space and Astronautical Science, School of Physical Sciences, Sokendai, Japan 11Space Science and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA 12Space Information Center, Hokkaido Information University, Hokkaido, Japan 13School of Engineering, University of Shiga Prefecture, Shiga, Japan (Dated: Published in Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series the 7 of December 2018; original manuscript here.) ABSTRACT We present measurements of the wind speeds at the nightside lower clouds of Venus from observations by JAXA's mission Akatsuki during 2016, complemented with new wind measurements from ground-based observations acquired with TNG/NICS in 2012 and IRTF/SpeX in 2015 and 2017. Zonal and meridional components of the winds were measured from cloud tracking on a total of 466 Akatsuki images of Venus acquired by the camera IR2 using the 2.26- µm filter, with spatial resolutions ranging 10 -- 80 km per pixel and covering from 2016 March 22 to October 31. More than 149,000 wind vectors were obtained with an automatic technique of template matching, and 2,947 wind vectors were inferred with the manual procedure. The meridional profiles for both components of the winds are found to be consistent with results from the Venus Express mission during 2006 -- 2008, although stronger wind variability is found for the zonal component at equatorial latitudes where Akatsuki observations have better viewing geometry than Venus Express. The zonal winds at low latitudes also suggest a zonal variability that could be associated with solar tides or vertically propagating orographic waves. Finally, the combination of our wind measurements from TNG/NICS, IRTF/SpeX and Akatsuki images with previously published and based in data from 1978 to 2017 suggests variations of up to 30 m s−1 in the winds at the lower clouds of the Venus nightside. Keywords: planets and satellites: atmospheres, planets and satellites: terrestrial planets 1. INTRODUCTION Corresponding author: Javier Peralta [email protected] The atmospheric circulation of Venus from the sur- face up to the stratosphere is dominated by a retrograde zonal superrotation (h.a. RZS) which, according to both in situ (Counselman et al. 1980) and cloud tracking measurements (S´anchez-Lavega et al. 2008), attains the 2 Peralta et al. fastest wind speeds at the top of Venus's cloud layer (Schubert 1983; Gierasch et al. 1997; S´anchez-Lavega et al. 2017). The cloud layer is also where most of the energy from the solar radiation is deposited (Lee et al. 2015b), so a detailed characterization of the at- mospheric circulation at multiple levels of the clouds (S´anchez-Lavega et al. 2008; Peralta et al. 2017b) seems essential to properly evaluate the sources and trans- port of angular momentum in the atmosphere. The wind speeds at the upper clouds of Venus (60 -- 70 km above the surface) are customarily characterized with cloud tracking on both day (Rossow et al. 1990; Belton et al. 1991; Peralta et al. 2007; Limaye 2007; Kouyama et al. 2013; Khatuntsev et al. 2013; Hueso et al. 2015; Horinouchi et al. 2018) and night sides (Peralta et al. 2017c), while the winds at the deeper middle and lower clouds (about 48 -- 60 km) have been evaluated following cloud features visible on the dayside of the planet on the albedo at near infrared wavelengths (Belton et al. 1991; Hueso et al. 2015; Khatuntsev et al. 2017) and in the lower clouds on the nightside (S´anchez-Lavega et al. 2008; Hueso et al. 2012; Horinouchi et al. 2017b) thanks to inhomogeneities in the opacity of the lower clouds which can be observed at the infrared windows at 1.7 and 2.2-2.3 µm (Peralta et al. 2017a). After the discovery of these infrared spectral windows by Allen & Crawford (1984), and before the arrival of Akatsuki (Nakamura et al. 2016), ESA's Venus Ex- press mission (h.a. VEx) characterized the RZS at the deeper clouds with unprecedented detail during 2006 -- 2008. However, constraints due to VEx's polar orbit (Titov et al. 2006) and the long exposure times required by the imaging spectrometer VIRTIS-M (Pic- cioni et al. 2007) limited observations to the southern hemisphere of Venus with lower quality results at equa- torial and lower latitudes (S´anchez-Lavega et al. 2008; Hueso et al. 2012; McGouldrick et al. 2012; Peralta et al. 2017b). As a result, the circulation at the level of the deeper clouds is yet poorly characterized in the north- ern hemisphere where only sparse measurements exist from ground-based observations (Crisp et al. 1989, 1991; Chanover et al. 1998; Limaye et al. 2006) and images from the Near-Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (NIMS) instrument during the flyby of NASA's Galileo in 1990 (Carlson et al. 1991). Since its orbit insertion in 2015 December, JAXA's Akatsuki orbiter has permitted an invaluable opportunity to study this deeper atmospheric circulation on both hemispheres thanks to its equatorial orbit (Nakamura et al. 2016) and the images provided by the 2-µm camera IR2 (Satoh et al. 2016). In this work we present the first global measurements of the wind speeds at the nocturnal lower clouds of Venus during the first year of Akatsuki observations. A description of the observations performed by the IR2 camera, the processing of the images, navigation correc- tions and methods of cloud tracking are introduced in section 2. The lower clouds' morphologies, the merid- ional profiles of wind speeds and the possible relation between morphologies and speeds are presented in sec- tion 3. The wind speeds' dependence on the size and opacity of the clouds, the local time and an explo- ration of possible relations with the surface topography is studied in section 4, while the temporal variation of the winds of the lower clouds is presented in section 5. Finally, the main conclusions of this work are presented in section 6. 2. METHODS After failing its originally-planned orbit insertion in 2010 December 7, Akatsuki orbited the Sun for 5 years and was inserted with success into a Venus orbit in 2015 December (Nakamura et al. 2016). At present, the orbiter performs a westward equatorial orbit with an apoapsis of ∼360,000 km, periapsis ranging 1,000 -- 8,000 km, and a rotation period of about 10 days. Among the payload, the camera IR2 was designed to sense the deep clouds of Venus and infer information about the atmospheric compounds below the cloud layer thanks to its narrow-band filters centered at 1.74, 2.26 and 2.32 µm (Satoh et al. 2016). The scientific objectives of these filters include the study of the morphology of the clouds and their motions, the aerosols' properties or the abundance of the CO below the clouds (Satoh et al. 2017). Because of the highly eccentric orbit of Akatsuki, the spatial resolution of Venus in the IR2 images varies from 74 -- 12 km per pixel for off-pericenter observations, to 1.6 -- 0.2 km during pericentric ones (Nakamura et al. 2016). Unfortunately, the acquisition of IR2 images was indefinitely interrupted in 2016 December 9 when the electronic device controlling the IR1 and IR2 cameras started to experience an unstable power consumption that has persisted through the present time (Iwagami et al. 2018). In addition to the IR2 images, new wind measurements have been obtained in this work with ground-based im- ages of Venus acquired after the failure of the infrared channel of the VIRTIS-M (Hueso et al. 2012) instrument on VEx and before and after the time period covered by Akatsuki IR2 observations. The Near Infrared Camera Spectrometer (NICS) (Baffa et al. 2001) at the Ital- Nightside Winds of Venus with Akatsuki/IR2 3 ian National Telescope Galileo (TNG) at La Palma (Canary Islands, Spain) was used to acquire images of the nightside of Venus during 2012 July 11 -- 13 (Mota Machado et al. 2016), while the Medium-Resolution 0.8 -- 5.5 Micron Spectrograph and Imager (SpeX) (Rayner et al. 2003) at the 3-m National Aeronautics and Space Administration Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) was used to provide images of Venus with the K-continuum filter in 2015 September and 2017 January-February (Lee et al. 2017a). The wind measurements from these ground-based images will be presented in section 5. 2.1. Image processing IR2 acquired a total of 1,671 images1 of the night- side of Venus with the filters 1.74, 2.26 and 2.32 µm (Satoh et al. 2017) among which ∼1,370 were regarded as suitable for cloud tracking. Satoh et al. (2017, fig. 8a therein) reported a problem of light contamination in the IR2 images, consisting of the presence of halation rings and a cross pattern extending both horizontally and vertically around the saturated dayside of Venus and spreading with multiple reflections along the PtSi detector. Since this contamination is more reduced in the images taken with the 2.26-µm filter, we restricted our cloud tracking study to this data set composed of 466 images (although additional sets with 1.74-µm im- ages were used in the case of automated cloud tracking). The calibration version of the IR2 images used in this work ("v20170601") does not include any of the cor- rections for the light contamination proposed by Satoh et al. (2017) and an alternative image processing tech- nique was applied. This consisted in an adjustment of the brightness/contrast, followed by sharpening the images with an unsharp-mask technique, and finishing with the application of adaptive histogram equalization (see examples in Fig. 1). Images acquired with ground- based instruments at TNG and IRTF also suffered from contamination from the illuminated side of the planet and were processed similarly. Some examples of these images are shown in section 5. 2.2. Navigation of IR2 and ground-based images Uncertainties such as the thermal distortion affecting the Akatsuki spacecraft and the cameras onboard pre- vent high accuracy in the navigation of the Venus images at present, so additional corrections in the navigation are yet required (Ogohara et al. 2017; Satoh et al. 2017). In recently published studies with Akatsuki (Fukuhara et al. 2017; Horinouchi et al. 2017b; Lee et al. 2017b; Horinouchi et al. 2018) the navigation of the images was corrected with an algorithm able to perform an ellipse fitting from an automatic determination of the planetary limb pixels (Ogohara et al. 2012, 2017). This automatized identification of the limb becomes rather uncertain in many of the IR2 nightside images because of the light contamination previously described, and also due to the frequent darkening of the planetary limb because of the strong variability of the clouds' opacity at lower latitudes McGouldrick et al. (2008); Satoh et al. (2017). Instead, we coded an interactive tool inspired on the software WinJupos (Hahn & Jacquesson 2012) which allows the interactive adjustment of the position, size and orientation of the planet's grid2, using as refer- ence four locations of the limb chosen by the user (see Fig. 2). The visualization of the limb was improved by interactively modifying the brightness and contrast in each image. In the case of the IR2 images, the position of the grid was adjusted with a precision of 1/10th of pixel, its size was increased in some cases (less than 1.3% in all the cases), while the orientation of the grid required no corrections. Regarding the ground-based images from NICS and SpeX, these were navigated us- ing NASA's SPICE kernels (Acton 1996; Folkner et al. 2009), both the position and orientation of the grid were adjusted, and the predicted size was accurate enough to require no further corrections. 2.3. Techniques for Cloud Tracking After correcting the navigation and processing the im- ages, these were geometrically projected onto equirect- angular (cylindrical) geometry with an angular resolu- tion similar to the best resolution in the original images. In those cases of nightside images acquired when Akat- suki was closer to its pericenter, the better spatial reso- lution enabled measuring wind speeds at polar latitudes and azimuthal equidistant (polar) projections were per- formed too using an angular resolution similar to that found at latitudes of about 70◦ in the original image. Figure 3 shows examples of the original observations, their navigation after corrections and cylindrical and polar maps. For the measurement of wind speeds, two different techniques of cloud tracking were employed: (a) a manual method applied to the full data set of IR2 and ground-based images (see Table 1), consisting of a manual search of the cloud tracer followed by a fine ad- 1 Available at: http://darts.isas.jaxa.jp/planet/project/ 2 The corrected geometry files are available from the corre- akatsuki/ sponding author on reasonable request. 4 Peralta et al. Figure 1. Examples of IR2/2.26-µm images before and after the processing procedure described in this work: (A) IR2 image acquired in March 25, 11:33 UT, and (B) IR2 image acquired in August 25, 04:03 UT. Both images have been oriented so that the north-south-west-east of Venus appears approximately oriented up-down-left-right in the image. Figure 2. Example of the correction on the navigation of Akatsuki images using as reference a set of locations of the planetary limb selected by the user. The original navigation grid and the corrected one are displayed on the left and right sides, respectively. justment using an automatic template matching which is visually accepted or rejected by the human operator (similarly as performed by Hueso et al. 2015); and (b) a fully-automatic method used for images taken in 2016 July and August (see Table 1) and which applies the relaxation labeling technique (Ikegawa & Horinouchi 2016; Horinouchi et al. 2017a). Wind measurements are obtained by comparing the position on maps of cloud features that can be identified in two consecutive images with a given time difference. We obtained wind measurements with a manual method in which we perform an automatic template matching with a phase-correlation technique that has been also applied for cloud tracking on the Earth (Leese et al. 1970; Jun & Fengxian 1992; Humblot et al. 2005; Huang et al. 2012). We call this technique manual because a Nightside Winds of Venus with Akatsuki/IR2 5 Figure 3. Examples of images acquired with the filter 2.26-µm by Akatsuki/IR2 during the year 2016 (A -- G) and ground-based observations at 2.32-µm from TNG/NICS and IRTF/SpeX (H -- J): (A) 2016 October 10, 09:23 UT, (B) 2016 August 13, 00:33 UT, (C) 2016 July 11, 22:03 UT, (D) 2016 July 22, 14:33 UT, (E) 2016 October 19, 14:33 UT, (F) cylindrical and (G) polar projections for 2016 March 25, 07:33 UT (original shown in Fig. 6A), (H) 2012 July 11, 05:19 UT by TNG/NICS, (I) 2015 September 28, 16:03 UT by IRTF/SpeX, and (J) 2017 February 10, 02:31 UT by IRTF/SpeX. In the case of the polar projection (G), the northern and southern hemispheres are displayed above and below, respectively, with the geographical north/south pole located in the center. 6 Peralta et al. human user selects a region in the first image to obtain its best match in the second image and validates (or not) the final result. The phase-correlation permits to obtain the translation between two images shifted relative to each other (Kuglin 1975; Samritjiarapon & Chitsobhuk 2008), relying on a frequency-domain representation of the images calculated with the Fast Fourier Transform that enables to infer this shift from the location of a peak in a cross-correlogram. Figure 4 shows an example of the use of this technique where the narrow peak in the phase cross-correlogram is shown for a well identified tracer. A more complete explanation about the phase- correlation is provided by Kuglin (1976). Compared to the standard correlation, its performance is faster, and it is less sensitive to random noise and illumina- tion conditions (Ahmed & Jafri 2008). Even though the phase-correlation can potentially register sub-pixel displacements (Reddy & Chatterji 1996; Foroosh et al. 2002), we did not test this capability in this work and only accounted for displacements expressed as integers of pixels. Besides, since the boundaries of any image imply discontinuities in the signal that can introduce a noisier result, a zero-padding is advisable before apply- ing the FFT (Ahmed & Jafri 2008). For this reason, the initial and final templates (ranging sizes of 32×32 to 48×48 pixels) were convolved with a Hanning win- dow with a width of 0.7 before the FFT was applied. When no clear peak could be found with the phase cor- relation, or when the tracer identification was judged as not satisfactory for the human operator running the analysis, the wind measurement was rejected and the template matching was performed manually. Each of these manual measurements was verified by a human operator looking at visual reports as the one shown in Figure 4. A fully automatic technique based on classical image correlation for identifying the cloud tracers motions was also used by Horinouchi et al. (2017a,b) and we will show here detail report of these measurements. This technique is similar to those used in many previous studies of Venus cloud dynamics (Rossow et al. 1990; Kouyama et al. 2012; Khatuntsev et al. 2017; Hori- nouchi et al. 2018), but in this case the cross-correlation between images is computed along a sequence of images to estimate the horizontal velocity at a specific location (Horinouchi et al. 2017b, see Methods therein). This method was applied to images of the lower clouds ac- quired in 2.26 and 1.74-µm. All the IR2 images were projected onto equirectangular geometry with a fixed angular resolution of 0.125◦ per pixel regardless of the resolution of the original images (Ogohara et al. 2017). Figure 4. Example of positive identification of a cloud tracer in a pair of IR2 images using phase-correlation. Note that when a match is successful (see templates), a single and clear peak -- ideally Kronecker delta -- is apparent in the cross- correlogram located in the corner right-up. The inferred wind speeds are compared with a reference wind profile from VEx/VIRTIS-M (Hueso et al. 2012) in the two graphs below, while detailed information is provided on the right side below the correlogram. A complete report of clouds' matches with phase correlation can be found in the Supplemental Material (see Appendix A). Image processing was applied after the projection and consisted on a two-dimensional bandpass filter with Gaussian functions with the sigma values 0.25◦ for low pass and 3◦ for high pass with latitude and longitude. Finally, the template size for cloud tracking was set to a fixed value of 60×60 pixels for all the images. 3. MERIDIONAL PROFILES OF WIND SPEEDS A total of 2,947 wind vectors were obtained with the manual method for the nightside images of the IR2 camera for the full period covering during 2016 from March 22 (when pairs of IR2 images were taken within the same day for the first time) until October 31. The spatial resolution of the images ranged 10 -- 80 km per pixel and we selected pairs of images with time sepa- rations ranging from 1 hour up to 22 hours (in special cases of clouds displaying very small deformations over large time scales). The size of the cloud tracers com- prise dimensions ranging 510 -- 2,550 km, depending on the spatial resolution selected for the geometrical pro- jections. Images acquired over 2016 April, July and Nightside Winds of Venus with Akatsuki/IR2 7 August were also independently measured with the fully-automatic method described above resulting in 149,033 wind measurements from the tracking of cloud features with a fixed size of 790 km. The errors for the wind speeds obtained with manual tracking were calculated from the spatial resolution and the time in- terval between the images as explicated by Bevington & Robinson (1992), while in the case of automatic cloud tracking the calculation of the errors are explained by Ikegawa & Horinouchi (2016). Satoh et al. (2017, fig. 11b therein) and Limaye et al. (2018, fig. 15 therein) show Akatsuki IR2 images of strong cloud discontinuities in the lower clouds of Venus. These discontinuities propagate faster than the back- ground zonal flow and were suspected to be the mani- festation of waves rather than passive tracers. For this reason, we discarded the motions of these strong opac- ity discontinuities from our study of the global wind motions. In the case of the automatic cloud tracking, we ruled out all the measurements obtained from im- age pairs where this equatorial cloud discontinuity was apparent. As a result of this filtering, the number of wind vectors with the manual and automatic methods was reduced to 2,277 and 101,882 respectively. Since the automatic method does not provide a registry of the cloud morphologies tracked, this filtering also removed all automatic-generated wind vectors during April 2016. Table 1 summarizes the results obtained with both tech- niques in different time periods and their coverage over the planet. The full report of wind measurements from the 2.26-µm IR2 images without filtering out specific features and obtained with the manual method can be found in the Supplemental Material (see Appendix A), including a table with the complete data set of wind measurements with manual tracking, geometrical pro- jections, animations and detailed template matching results. 3.1. Morphologies of the nightside clouds Panels A -- G in Figure 3 exhibits a sample of the clouds' morphologies observed in the IR2/2.26-µm im- ages. Pioneering ground-based observations at these wavelengths (Allen & Crawford 1984; Crisp et al. 1991) show similar global characteristics as Akatsuki IR2 im- ages. The deeper clouds of Venus nightside are normally characterized by a dark band with high opacity clouds at low latitudes, while the mid-latitudes are dominated by brighter bands with lower opacity (see Figs. 3A -- B). Prior to Akatsuki, the mid-latitude bands appeared as almost featureless (Crisp et al. 1991; Limaye et al. 2006; Hueso et al. 2012). However, the higher spatial resolu- tion of the Akatsuki IR2 images reveals on them subtle though distinguishable wisps and patches (Figs. 3F -- G) sometimes invaded by broad bands of clouds with higher opacity (Fig. 3B), or unusual sharp dark spirals tilted relative to the latitude parallels (Figs. 3C -- D) which spread thousands of kilometres from latitudes higher than 30◦ towards equatorial ones (Horinouchi et al. 2017b; Satoh et al. 2017; Limaye et al. 2018). In the IR2 images, the clouds' opacity at lower lati- tudes exhibits higher variability than at mid-latitudes (Satoh et al. 2017; Limaye et al. 2018), confirming pre- vious findings with ground-based observations (Crisp et al. 1991; Limaye et al. 2006; Tavenner et al. 2008; Mota Machado et al. 2016) and during the VEx mis- sion (Hueso et al. 2012; McGouldrick et al. 2012; Mc- Gouldrick & Tsang 2017). Dark areas of high opacity normally dominate lower latitudes, while their bound- ary with the mid-latitude bright bands exhibits complex cloud features (Horinouchi et al. 2017b; Limaye et al. 2018), like small vortices or abundant bright swirls at around 30◦ which sometimes adopt shapes suggestive of shear instabilities (Fig. 3B,C,E), similar to those found at the nightside upper clouds at ∼65 km with 3.8-µm VEx images(Peralta et al. 2017c). The polar projection in Fig. 3G clearly exhibits an example of the frequent episodes of hemispherical asymmetry for the Venus clouds' morphology. A more complete survey of the clouds' morphologies apparent in the images by the Akatsuki/IR2 camera will be presented elsewhere. 3.2. Latitudinal profiles of the winds and relation with clouds Figure 5 shows zonally-averaged profiles of the manually-tracked winds at the lower clouds during the first year of Akatsuki observations. Bins of 5◦ of lati- tude were considered to calculate average wind speeds from March to October 2016. The profiles of IR2 are compared with VEx/VIRTIS-M results from 2006 April to 2008 August (Hueso et al. 2012). With regards to the zonal component of the wind (Fig. 5A), the mean profile obtained with IR2 is faster than VIRTIS- M measurements by 10 ms−1. The zonal winds from IR2 observations show symmetric profiles between both hemispheres and, despite the higher dispersion at higher latitudes due to the poorer spatial resolution of the IR2 images close to the poles, they show for the first time the decay of the winds towards the poles on both hemi- spheres simultaneously. This decay starts at about 60◦ and, compared to VEx results, it seems more abrupt, 8 Peralta et al. Table 1. Coverage of Akatsuki/IR2 Winds during year 2016 Month March April June July Dates* 22,23,25 -- 30 15 20 1,11,12,22 August 2,9,10,13,15 -- 17, 18,19,20,21,22,25, 26,27,28,29,30 Latitudes 61◦N -- 60◦S 43◦N -- 63◦S 40◦N -- 21◦N 72◦N -- 69◦S 58◦N -- 58◦S Local Times Longitudes Wind Vectors** 23h -- 05h 01h -- 06h 18h -- 20h 18h -- 01h 18h -- 03h 225◦ -- 308◦ 281◦ -- 348◦ 264◦ -- 289◦ 250◦ -- 23◦ 322◦ -- 129◦ 249 35+306 12 308+6920 1057+94656 September 4 -- 6,15,26,27 October 2 -- 7,10 -- 17, 59◦N -- 60◦S 56◦N -- 72◦S 19h -- 05h 20h -- 05h 28◦ -- 188◦ 114◦ -- 270◦ 347 939 19 -- 27,31 ∗Bold characters stand for dates with wind measurements from both manual and fully-automatic ∗∗Normal and bold characters stand for number of wind measurements obtained with the manual methods. Normal characters are used for dates with only manual measurements. and fully-automatic methods, respectively. while it keeps similarities with wind profiles obtained in 2004 with ground-ground observations (Limaye et al. 2006, fig. 5 therein), albeit, with higher errors. However, we cannot rule out that these differences at subpolar lat- itudes with respect to VEx/VIRTIS-M subpolar winds are not caused by the worse spatial resolution at polar latitudes and the low number of measurements in the Akatsuki IR2 images (Fig. 5C). Regarding the merid- ional component of the wind (Fig. 5B), the results of 2016 and 2006 -- 2008 are in good agreement, confirming the absence of clear global motions in the meridional circulation of the nocturnal lower clouds. Wind variability is also apparent during 2016 (see Fig. 6). The profile obtained in 2016 March 25 (Fig. 6A) corresponds to winds that are approximately constant between the equator and mid-latitudes with small meridional shear. This seems to be most frequent case found at the lower clouds during the Akatsuki obser- vations and also during the VEx mission (Hueso et al. 2012, fig. 7 therein). Zonal wind profiles on other dates like the July 11 (Figs. 6B) and October 13 (6C) exhibit more intense equatorial zonal speeds, first-time reported during the Galileo flyby (Crisp et al. 1991, fig. 4 therein) and later identified as recurrent episodes of jets at the equator (Horinouchi et al. 2017b). There is a reasonable correspondence between this local intensification of the zonal speeds and the presence of features resembling shear instabilities (Fig. 6B) or sharp opacity disconti- nuities at the equator (Fig. 6C). The high dispersion in the horizontal speeds also suggests that these jets may be apparent only in a rather longitudinally narrow area. The profile during July 11 (Fig. 6B) shows that these jets can sometimes show up at northern latitudes, as also reported in 1990 during the Galileo flyby (Carlson et al. 1991, fig. 6 therein) and in 1996 from observations at the Apache Point Observatory (Chanover et al. 1998, fig. 7 therein). 4. SOURCES OF VARIABILITY FOR THE WIND SPEEDS AT THE LOWER CLOUDS. In this section, we explore whether the size of the fea- tures tracked, the opacity of the clouds, the uncertain- ties in their vertical sensing, or a dependence on the lo- cal time and surface elevations, can help to explain the variability observed in the winds of the nightside lower clouds. 4.1. Effect of opacity and size of the clouds It is yet unclear whether the episodes of faster zonal speeds shown in Fig. 6 may be related to horizontal and/or vertical gradients of the zonal wind, or if the bright and dark clouds observed on the nightside at 1.74, 2.26 and 2.32 µm are moving at the same or at slightly different vertical levels. Early interpreta- tions of Venus IR features considered that these clouds' contrasts might be caused either by scattered sunlight leaking in from the dayside along altitudes with low absorption in the CO2 windows, or that dark areas Nightside Winds of Venus with Akatsuki/IR2 9 Figure 5. Mean profiles of the winds at the nocturnal middle-to-lower clouds of Venus as measured from March to October 2016 with the manual method using the Akatsuki/IR2 2.26-µm images (dark red line). These profiles are compared with the winds measured with 1.74-µm images acquired with VEx/VIRTIS-M (blue line) between 2006 April and 2008 August (Hueso et al. 2012). The profiles for the zonal and zonal and meridional components are shown in panels (A) and (B), respectively. Average values shown here were calculated for bins of latitude of 5◦, and the number of measurements used in each bin are displayed in panel C.The shadowed areas stand for the standard deviation at every latitude bin when this is larger than the measurement error computed from the image resolution and time differences in the image pair. corresponded to opaque clouds lying in a broken layer at certain altitude above the brighter regions and ra- diate as blackbodies at the lower temperature of their tops (Allen & Crawford 1984). Allen (1987) discarded both interpretations, confirming that the existence of important differences in the vertical elevation of bright and dark clouds was inconsistent with the small varia- tions that dark/bright areas exhibit in CO absorptions affecting the wide 2.2-2.3 µm band. Therefore, the dark and bright regions should correspond to horizontal inhomogeneities in the clouds' opacity to the deeper background thermal emission (Allen 1987; Crisp et al. 1989), although certain discrepancies of altitude be- tween dark and bright clouds cannot be discarded since these inhomogeneities can be caused by variations in the size and distribution of the particles within the lower and middle clouds (McGouldrick & Toon 2008). Assuming a range of 50 -- 60 km for the altitudes sensed at the relevant wavelengths (McGouldrick et al. 2008), a comparison with in situ wind profiles from descending probes (Gierasch et al. 1997; Counselman et al. 1980; Moroz & Zasova 1997) indicates that variations of up to 30 m s−1 could be explained in terms of the vertical shear (Peralta et al. 2017c, fig. 3 therein), what is also consistent with the magnitude of the reported jets (Hori- nouchi et al. 2017b, fig. 2b therein). Crisp et al. (1991) obtained a discrepancy between velocities of large dark clouds and the smaller markings (sizes ranging 400 -- 1000 km), and also suggested that these might be produced at different altitudes. Figure 7 displays the distribu- tion of zonal speeds obtained with the manual method compared with the averaged radiance (Fig. 7B) and the size of the cloud tracers between 50◦N -- 50◦S (Fig. 7A) in the IR2 2.26-µm images. No dependence is apparent be- tween the zonal velocities and these parameters. Since the low latitudes frequently exhibit cloud patterns that resemble shear instabilities for a wide range of scales (see Figs. 3C -- E; Limaye et al. 2018, fig. 10 therein), the generation of jets due to meridional gradients in the horizontal winds seems probable. McGouldrick & Toon (2007, 2008) showed that large-scale dynamics can also 10 Peralta et al. Figure 6. Variability in clouds' morphology (left column) and profiles of zonal and meridional winds (center and right column) during the Akatsuki mission in 2016: (A) winds during March 25, exhibiting the standard profile of constant zonal speeds; (B) winds during July 11, displaying a zonal jet at ∼20◦N; and (C) winds during October 13, exhibiting a strong jet at the equator and higher dispersion in the south- ern hemisphere. Reference profiles built from winds during the VEx mission (Hueso et al. 2012) and plot in a symmetric way for the two hemispheres are displayed in cyan. explain the strong variations in the cloud opacity, and that even weak downwelling is able to produce optical- depth holes in the clouds. 4.2. Local time dependence. Since most of the sunlight absorption occurs on Venus within the clouds' layer, solar tides are expected to be excited and carry momentum away upwards and down- wards from the region of excitation, thus accelerating the atmosphere westwards and contributing to the RZS (Gierasch et al. 1997; S´anchez-Lavega et al. 2017). The effect of the solar tides have been unambiguously de- tected on both zonal and meridional components of the winds at the upper clouds at 65 -- 70 km (Rossow Figure 7. Histograms and scatter plot of the wind measure- ments acquired with the manual method and Akatsuki/IR2 images. The panel (A) shows histograms of the zonal ve- locities for two ranges of spatial scales of cloud tracers. The panel (B) exhibits the values of zonal wind speeds in terms of the mean radiance (red dots). The radiance is given for the calibration version "v20170601" of the IR2 2.26-µm im- ages, and corresponds to the radiance averaged inside the template. et al. 1990; Limaye 2007; S´anchez-Lavega et al. 2008; Kouyama et al. 2012; Peralta et al. 2012; Khatuntsev et al. 2013; Hueso et al. 2015), but no evident influence has been found for the middle-to-lower clouds (50 -- 60 km) for either day (Hueso et al. 2015; Khatuntsev et al. 2017) or night (Hueso et al. 2012, fig. 6 therein). Khatuntsev et al. (2017) argued that this negligible ef- fect of the solar tides could be related to the absence of the unknown absorber downward of the middle clouds (which is responsible for most of the solar heat deposi- tion on Venus). Figure 8 allows to study the local time dependence for the winds at the nightside lower clouds of Venus during 2016. In agreement with VEx results during 2006 -- 2008, no local time dependence is apparent in the meridional Nightside Winds of Venus with Akatsuki/IR2 11 winds (Fig. 8B). However, the zonal component of the wind speed displays a local increase of the zonal speeds between 19 -- 22 LT, followed by a gradual decrease to- wards late nightside local times (decrease of ∼10 m s−1 between 19 LT and midnight). Hueso et al. (2012) also reported hints of faster retrograde winds close to dawn during 2006 -- 2008, although this local time effect was weaker and disregarded due to the small number of measurements in this area. Recent results from Venus General Circulation Models (h.a. GCMs) predict that the diurnal tide should be also apparent on the zonal wind down to the middle clouds at ∼60 km with the slowest speeds centered at the evening terminator (Tak- agi et al. 2018, fig. 3a therein). Better agreement is found for the GCM results at the lower clouds (∼50 km), where the influence of the diurnal tide is predicted to weaken but a local maximum of about 10 m s−1 is also found in the early night and before the midnight (Takagi et al. 2018, fig. 4a therein). 4.3. Longitudinal dependence. Evidences on how the surface topography may be in- fluencing the atmospheric circulation through the exci- tation of atmospheric stationary waves (lee waves) have been accumulating. Vertical disturbances experienced by the VEGA-2 balloon over Aphrodite terra (Blamont et al. 1986), strong asymmetries of the water vapor over certain geographical locations (Fedorova et al. 2016), or the finding of multiple stationary waves at the upper clouds of Venus which are strongly correlated with the surface elevations (Peralta et al. 2017c; Fukuhara et al. 2017; Kouyama et al. 2017) strongly suggest surface effects on the upper atmosphere. Results of cloud track- ing in VEx/VMC dayside images seem to support that the wind speeds at the cloud tops are decelerated as they pass over Aphrodite terra and Atla regio (Bertaux et al. 2016, figs. 4 and 6 therein). Other works have reported indications of an effect of surface elevations for the winds at the middle cloud (Khatuntsev et al. 2017, fig. 14 therein) and over the oxygen airglow patterns (Gorinov et al. 2018). Peralta et al. (2017c) discovered that during 2006 -- 2008 the RZS at the nocturnal upper clouds exhibited a higher variability compared to the dayside, but the geographical coverage of the wind measurements was insufficient to confirm a correlated effect with the sur- face elevations. In the case of the lower clouds on the nightside, stationary waves are paradoxically missing in the clouds' opacity and no longitudinal dependence had been reported for the wind speeds (a reanalysis of VIRTIS-M winds for the lower clouds resulted in- conclusive due to the lack of enough data to separate local time effects from time variability and the elusive surface dependence). Figure 9 displays the dependence on the longitude and latitude for the manual wind mea- surements with the Akatsuki IR2 images. While no clear effect is found for the meridional component of the wind (Fig. 9B), the westward windspeeds exhibit a local maximum at low latitudes over longitudes ranging 300◦ -- 120◦ (fig. 9A). Unfortunately, separating the effects of the longitudi- nal and local time dependences is not feasible with our results, since the observed velocity disturbances are just marginally larger than the corresponding errors and the incomplete coverage of our wind measurements. Fig- ure 10 shows the distribution of the mean zonal speeds (panel 10A) and the number of measurements (10B) in terms of local time and longitude. To avoid the expected decrease of the zonal winds towards the poles, only the Akatsuki/IR2 wind measurements between 50◦N -- 50◦S were considered. Panel 10B shows that the number of wind measurements during the year 2016 is irregularly distributed for both longitude and local time param- eters, preventing a confirmation of either a local time dependence and/or influence of surface elevations. However, the influence of the surface elevations over the zonal winds at the nightside lower clouds might be yet regarded as controversial. Published results for the zonal winds on the dayside were originated from a huge set of wind measurements with noticeable dispersion (Bertaux et al. 2016, fig. 2 therein), and authors do not report filtering out other important sources of variabil- ity such as transient waves or the local time dependence. In the case of zonal wind speeds obtained with Akat- suki/UVI images, Horinouchi et al. (2018) characterized and removed the local time dependence on the zonal winds at the dayside upper clouds. As a result, no effect of surface elevations was found for the dayside winds (Horinouchi et al. 2018, fig. 14b therein). In the case of our results for the nightside lower clouds, the local maximum extends mostly over rather plain areas and do not seem well correlated with the surface elevations at lower latitudes. Moreover, our results seem incon- sistent with those on the dayside reported by Bertaux et al. (2016) and Khatuntsev et al. (2017) since, con- versely to the zonal wind speeds on the dayside from VEx/VMC which exhibit a local minimum with slower speeds extending along 0◦ -- 200◦ (Bertaux et al. 2016, fig. 3 therein), our westward winds on the nightside dis- 12 Peralta et al. Figure 8. Local time dependence for the zonal winds obtained with the manual method on the Akatsuki/IR2-2.26-µm images. Bins of 10◦ in latitude and 40 minutes in local time were used. Panels (A) and (B) display the values of zonal and meridional components of the wind averaged in each bin; panel (C) shows the distribution of wind measurements with dots representing individual measurements; (D) and (E) display the standard deviation of the measurements in each bin; and (F) shows the meridional profiles of zonal winds at different intervals of local time. play a local maximum between longitudes 300◦ -- 120◦. 4.4. Results from automatically retrieved winds during 2016 July and August We now explore possible winds dependencies with the factors shown above for our wind results obtained in the automatic cloud correlation technique and firstly reported by Horinouchi et al. (2017b). The dependence with both local time and longitude for the winds ob- tained with the fully-automatic method are displayed in Figure 11. Since for these wind speeds only IR2 images obtained during 2016 July and August were used (see Table 1), the coverage is more limited than in the case of the manual method, and the dispersion is smaller than for the manual results (see figs. 8D,8E,9D and 9E). Except for the case of the meridional winds where no clear dependence with the local time and longitude is found, the zonal winds with automatic correlation are not fully consistent with that from manual wind measurements, and no influence over the zonal speeds is observed at any range of local time or longitude. Even though some discrepancies were expected between both cloud tracking methods and the different techniques to correct the navigation of the IR2 images, the homo- geneity found for the zonal winds at low latitudes might be explained due to the recurrence of the equatorial jet during August 2016 (Horinouchi et al. 2017b), which would mask a weaker dependence on local time and/or longitude. 4.5. Combined results of Akatsuki and Venus Express Nightside Winds of Venus with Akatsuki/IR2 13 Figure 9. Local time dependence for the zonal winds obtained with the manual method on the Akatsuki/IR2-2.26-µm images. Bins of 10◦ and 40' were considered for the latitude and local time, respectively. Panels (A) and (B) display the values of zonal and meridional components of the wind averaged in each bin; panel (C) shows the distribution of wind measurements; (D) and (E) display the error (standard deviation) in each bin; and (F) exhibits the surface elevation of Venus as a comparison. We also combined the manual wind speeds at the nocturnal lower clouds with Akatsuki/IR2 in the year 2016 with those obtained by Hueso et al. (2012) with VEx/VIRTIS-M from 2006 to 2008. Since the mean zonal winds during 2016 were faster than during the VEx mission (see Fig. 5A), the difference between the zonal averages of both datasets equatorward of midlatitudes was suppressed by multiplying by a cor- recting factor of 1.06 the zonal speeds obtained with the VEx/VIRTIS-M images, while those from Akat- suki/IR2 images were divided by 1.06. As a result, a correction of ∼4 m s−1 was introduced in both sets of winds. Also, these two datasets have a comparable number of points and both are based on cloud tracking inspected/validated by human operators. The result of their combination is presented in the figure 12. The dependence with the local time (panels 12A -- B, E -- F) confirms the equatorial maximum of the zonal speeds between local hours 18h -- 22h, while this dependence clearly decays towards higher latitudes. On the other hand, the meridional component of the wind displays no apparent dependence at low latitudes, while at higher latitudes of the southern hemisphere (50◦S -- 90◦S) and between 21h -- 22h it exhibits an equatorward accelera- tion (panel 12B). These results, again, suggest that the solar tide detected on the winds of the upper clouds (Limaye 2007; Peralta et al. 2012) might be able to propagate downwards to the middle clouds as predicted by some Venus GCMs (Takagi et al. 2018). Regarding the dependence with longitude and surface elevations, the local maximum between longitudes 300◦ -- 120◦ re- ported in subsection 4.3 for the westward windspeeds is observed (panel 12C), while the meridional component exhibits no clear influence from the surface (panel 12D). 14 Peralta et al. the clouds' dynamics might experience cyclic changes with a time scale of 5 -- 10 years. This conclusion was based on the periods of presence/absence of the 4 and 5-day wave modes, while during the VEx mission Lee et al. (2015a, fig. 18 therein) reported unexplained pe- riods of 154,275,357 and 560 days on the 365-nm albedo. Long-term trends were also observed for the dayside winds of the upper clouds during the VEx mission. Be- tween 2006 -- 2013 the mean zonal velocity measured with ultraviolet images from the VMC camera displayed an increase from 80 to 100 m s−1 at about 20◦S (Khatunt- sev et al. 2013, fig. 14 therein), while a similar increase trend was independently confirmed in this period with cloud tracking in VIRTIS-M images (Hueso et al. 2015). Kouyama et al. (2013) analyzed VEx/VMC images find- ing that the zonal winds equatorward of 30◦S exhibited a periodical perturbation of ∼10 m s−1 every 257±2 terrestrial days which was ultimately interpreted as centrifugal waves (Peralta et al. 2014, fig. 4 therein). Measurements with Akatsuki/UVI images have also confirmed zonal windspeeds variations with time scales of ∼100 days between December 2015 and March 2017 (Horinouchi et al. 2018, figs. 8 -- 10 therein). Numerical simulations with GCMs have also been used to predict decadal variation in the zonal winds in Venus (Parish et al. 2011). The long-term variability of the winds at the level of the lower clouds was studied during the VEx mission on the nightside with VIRTIS-M by Hueso et al. (2012) and on the dayside with VMC by Khatuntsev et al. (2017). During the years 2006 -- 2008, the nightside winds at the deeper clouds showed at subpolar latitudes stronger variability than at lower ones (Hueso et al. 2012, figs. 7 -- 8 therein), while a comparison between the zonal winds during the Galileo flyby in 1990 and the 2-year average from VEx do not indicate noticeable variations except for the northern jet reported from the Galileo/NIMS images (S´anchez-Lavega et al. 2017, fig. 3 therein). McGouldrick & Tsang (2017) reported an oscillation of approximately 150 days apparent between 30◦S -- 60◦S on the nightside clouds' radiance of the 1.74-µm VIRTIS- M images, with this time scale being consistent with the cycle of cloud formation and evolution driven by the radiative dynamical feedback and gravitational set- tling of clouds' particles. The analysis of the dayside winds with VMC from 2006 December to 2013 August (∼1,200 days) revealed long-term variations on both components of the wind at ∼20◦S, with the meridional winds exhibiting a gradual increase until doubling its magnitude, while the zonal winds seemed subject to Figure 10. Distribution as a function of Longitude and Lo- cal Time of the wind measurements acquired with the man- ual method and Akatsuki/IR2 images between 50◦N -- 50◦S. The panel (A) displays the distribution of the zonal wind speeds. Panel (B) shows the distribution of the number of measurements. 5. TIME EVOLUTION OF THE WINDS Results from past space missions to Venus and com- parison between them have provided evidence of long- term variability affecting the atmospheric dynamics at the upper clouds of Venus (S´anchez-Lavega et al. 2017, fig. 2 therein). Rossow et al. (1990) reported that during the Pioneer Venus zonal winds at equa- tor and mid-latitudes exhibited variations ranging 5 -- 8 m s−1 over time spanning 1 -- 6 years, while the inten- sity of the poleward circulation seemed also subject to variability. From the analysis of the ultraviolet albedo of the cloud tops in different missions, del Genio & Rossow (1990) suggested that between 1979 and 1986 Nightside Winds of Venus with Akatsuki/IR2 15 Figure 11. Contour maps for the dependence of zonal and meridional winds obtained with the full-automatic method in the Akatsuki/IR2 images. Averages (panels A,C,E,G) and standard deviation (B,D,F,H).The larger number of wind measurements allows to calculate these maps with bins of latitude, longitude and local time of 3.3◦, 3.3◦ and 13 minutes respectively, or three times smaller than in the manual tracking results. However, the spatial coverage over local times and longitudes is more limited in this case due to the data coming from a smaller number of dates. an apparent oscillation of ∼3 years (Khatuntsev et al. 2017, fig. 11 therein). In order to perform an analysis of the variability of the zonal winds at the nightside lower clouds using an even longer time scale, we decided to combine data not only from Akatsuki/IR2 and VEx/VIRTIS, but also from ground-based observations and in situ measure- ments. Figure 13 shows the variability of zonal winds at low latitudes (30◦S -- 30◦N) of the nightside lower clouds from 1978 December to 2017 February (span- ning 38 years). The zonal winds during 1978 December (Fig. 13A) and 1985 June (Fig. 13D) correspond to the averages of instantaneous in situ wind measurements between 50 and 60 km of altitude as provided by the Pioneer Venus Night probe (Counselman et al. 1980) and VEGA landers (Moroz & Zasova 1997). To reduce the impact of transient phenomena like the equatorial jets, the zonal winds obtained with cloud tracking are presented as time averages of about 10 -- 20 days in most of the cases, though this value strongly depends on the data availability and how this is distributed along time. Thus, zonal speeds from IRTF/SpeX images correspond to nearly instantaneous winds (several hours) while the average for 2004 May is provided by Limaye et al. (2006) for observations performed along 70 days. The mean zonal winds displayed in Fig. 13A -- I were obtained from published results (Counselman et al. 1980; Allen & Crawford 1984; Allen 1987; Moroz & Zasova 1997; Crisp et al. 1989, 1991; Carlson et al. 1991; Chanover et al. 1998; Limaye et al. 2006). The wind speeds from 2006 to 2017 correspond to a revisit of the VEx measure- 16 Peralta et al. Figure 12. Winds' dependence with local time and longitude when the measurements from VEx/VIRTIS-M (2006 -- 2008) and Akatsuki/IR2 (2016) are combined. Averages and standard deviation are calculated for bins of latitude, longitude and local time of 10◦, 10◦ and 40' respectively. Panels (A -- D) display the zonal and meridional winds' dependence with the local time and the longitude, while panels (E -- H) display the corresponding errors. Since the mean zonal winds during 2016 were faster than during the VEx mission (see Fig. 5A), the zonal speeds used in panel (A) and (C) where multiplied by a correction factor to have comparable zonally averaged profiles. ments (Fig. 13J) performed by S´anchez-Lavega et al. (2008); Hueso et al. (2012), and our measurements with Akatsuki/IR2 (Fig. 13M), IRTF/SpeX (Fig. 13L,N) and TNG/NICS (Fig. 13K). Although caution must be taken when comparing val- ues from different time-averages and images acquired with different filters may provide some discrepancies in the vertical level sensed, Fig. 13 suggests that the zonal wind speeds at the nightside lower clouds seems to experience long-term variation in the intensity of the winds of up to 30 m s−1 (this total variation is larger than variabilities linked by the local time or longitudinal dependence described in subsections 4.2 and 4.3). The zonal winds display a strong increase from the entry of the Pioneer Venus probes in 1978 (Fig. 13A) and the first cloud-tracked winds with ground-based observa- tions (Fig. 13B) in the early 1980s. From 1983 to 1990 (Fig. 13B -- G) the zonal winds exhibit a gradual decrease in magnitude, while from 2004 to 2008 the zonal winds experience an increase above the error bars (Fig. 13J from VEx data). This long-term behaviour of the night- side zonal winds from VIRTIS-M images diverges from the oscillation between 2007 and 2009 reported on the zonal winds between 15◦S -- 25◦S of the dayside middle- to-lower clouds found (Khatuntsev et al. 2017, fig. 11a therein). The differences between the altitude range sensed in day and night side images (S´anchez-Lavega et al. 2008; Takagi & Iwagami 2011; Khatuntsev et al. 2017) or the distinct image sampling and time coverage for the winds obtained from VMC and VIRTIS-M may account for this discrepancy between VEx results. The decadal variability for the zonal winds at the lower clouds also keep similarities with the long-term trend for the SO2 abundance at the cloud tops reported by (Marcq et al. 2013) during 30 years of observations combining Pioneer Venus and VEx observations. The gradual decrease of the zonal winds along 1983 -- 1990 matches the decrease of the SO2 at the upper clouds (Marcq et al. 2013, fig. 3 therein), what would support the idea that the vertical level sensed by the nightside images at 1.74, 2.26 and 2.32 µm might be variable. This would make sense if the photochemical activity at Nightside Winds of Venus with Akatsuki/IR2 17 Figure 13. Decadal variation of the zonal winds at the nightside lower clouds of Venus. Data correspond to time-averages of the zonal winds obtained between 30◦S -- 30◦N with cloud tracking, except for (A) and (D) that represent instantaneous in situ wind measurements from the Pioneer Venus Night probe (Counselman et al. 1980) and VEGA landers (Moroz & Zasova 1997) averaged within 50 -- 60 km of altitude. Blue dots represent time-averages using wind speeds provided in past publications: (A) Counselman et al. (1980), (B) Allen & Crawford (1984), (C) Allen (1987), (D) Moroz & Zasova (1997), (E) Crisp et al. (1989), (F) Crisp et al. (1991), (G) Carlson et al. (1991), (H) Chanover et al. (1998), (I) Limaye et al. (2006), and (J) Hueso et al. (2012). New data presented in this work and based in cloud tracking measurements are displayed with red dots and were obtained from TNG/NICS (K), IRTF/SpeX (L and N), and Akatsuki/IR2 images (M). The error bars stand for the standard deviation of the time averages. the upper clouds might could affect the total opacity of the cloud layer (Knollenberg & Hunten 1980; Grinspoon et al. 1993). In such a case, faster zonal speeds may be coincident with periods when higher altitudes can be sensed in the nightside images. 6. CONCLUSIONS We have presented global results of the wind speeds at the nightside lower clouds of Venus during the first year of JAXA's Akatsuki mission. Both zonal and meridional winds were obtained applying cloud tracking techniques over 2.26-µm images acquired by the IR2 camera from a selection of 466 images spanning the time interval from 2016 March 22 to October 31. Automatic and manual measurements were applied independently to obtain 149,033 and 2,947 wind vectors, respectively. In the specific case of the manual measurements, the phase correlation technique was tested in the template matching for the first time on Venus with comparable results to those obtained using cross-correlation tech- niques in the space domain. No dependence is found between the wind speeds and the radiance or the size of the cloud tracers. This supports recent reports of wind variability due to strong horizontal shear and episodes of jets at the equator, and the identification of clouds' morphology consistent with shear instabilities. The 197819831988199319982003200820132018-40-50-60-70-80-90Zonal Wind (m s-1)ABCDEFGHIJKLMN18 Peralta et al. meridional profiles of zonally-averaged wind speeds are in overall agreement with results during 2006 -- 2008 from Venus Express but are systematically 10 m s−1 faster. Our results confirm in the northern hemisphere the expected poleward decay of the zonal winds with sym- metric winds between both hemispheres. Conversely to past observations with Venus Express, zonal speeds during the Akatsuki mission exhibits a local maximum in the westward windspeeds caused by either a local time dependence and/or influence of surface elevations, although the irregular coverage of the dataset prevents a definitive confirmation of its source. Also, a first analy- sis of the decadal wind variability is performed for zonal winds between 30◦S and 30◦N using a combination of in situ and cloud tracking measurements performed be- tween 1978 and 2017. Our results demonstrate yearly and decade wind variability, suggesting that the zonal winds at low latitudes might be affected by an oscillat- ing disturbance with an amplitude of about ∼15 m s−1 and a period of about 30 years. Finally, in order to facilitate future studies of wind variability and data comparison, we provide the full data set of wind measurements performed with the manual technique, accompanied by the template match for individual measurements and animations of the pro- jected image sequences used towards this purpose (see accompanying Supplemental Material and Appendix A). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS J.P. acknowledges JAXA's International Top Young Fellowship. R.H. and A.S.-L. were supported by the Spanish MINECO project AYA2015-65041-P with FEDER, UE support and Grupos Gobierno Vasco IT- 765-13. All authors acknowledge the work of the entire Akatsuki team. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewer for his/her useful comments to improve the manuscript. APPENDIX A. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL The supplemental material that accompanies this work consists on a compressed file that contains not only the numerical values for our manual wind measurements obtained with the images of Akatsuki/IR2 camera, but also a large set of images exhibiting the morphology of cloud tracers and the quality of the template matching, geometrical projections of the IR2 images and animations of the cloud motions. The contents of the supplemental material are described as it follows: • a Readme file with a more detailed description of the contents of compressed file, as well as explanations about the naming of files and folders. • a Microsoft Excel file with the numerical values of the 2,277 manual wind measurements and where the motions of the equatorial cloud discontinuity have been filtered out. • a total of 103 folders for each pair of IR2 images, with wind measurements, animations and cloud tracers' morphology and position. REFERENCES Acton, C. H. 1996, Planetary and Space Science, 44, 65 Ahmed, J., & Jafri, M. N. 2008, in Image and Signal Bertaux, J.-L., Khatuntsev, I. V., Hauchecorne, A., et al. 2016, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 121, Processing, ed. A. Elmoataz, O. Lezoray, F. Nouboud, & D. Mammass (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 128 -- 135 Allen, D. A. 1987, Icarus, 69, 221 Allen, D. A., & Crawford, J. W. 1984, Nature, 307, 222 Baffa, C., Comoretto, G., Gennari, S., et al. 2001, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 378, 722 1087 Bevington, P. R., & Robinson, D. K. 1992, Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences (New York: McGraw-Hill, -- c1992, 2nd ed.) Blamont, J. E., Young, R. E., Seiff, A., et al. 1986, Science, 231, 1422 Belton, M. J. S., Gierasch, P. J., Smith, M. D., et al. 1991, Carlson, R. W., Baines, K. H., Kamp, L. W., et al. 1991, Science, 253, 1531 Science, 253, 1541 Nightside Winds of Venus with Akatsuki/IR2 19 Chanover, N. J., Glenar, D. A., & Hillman, J. J. 1998, Ikegawa, S., & Horinouchi, T. 2016, Icarus, 271, 98 Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 31335 Iwagami, N., Sakanoi, T., Hashimoto, G. L., et al. 2018, Counselman, C. C., Gourevitch, S. A., King, R. W., Loriot, Earth, Planets, and Space, 70, 6 G. B., & Ginsberg, E. S. 1980, Journal of Geophysical Research, 85, 8026 Crisp, D., Sinton, W. M., Hodapp, K.-W., et al. 1989, Science, 246, 506 Crisp, D., McMuldroch, S., Stephens, S. K., et al. 1991, Science, 253, 1538 del Genio, A. D., & Rossow, W. B. 1990, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 47, 293 Fedorova, A., Marcq, E., Luginin, M., et al. 2016, Icarus, 275, 143 Folkner, W. M., Williams, J. G., & Boggs, D. H. 2009, Interplanetary Network Progress Report, 178, 1 Foroosh, H., Zerubia, J. B., & Berthod, M. 2002, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 11, 188 Fukuhara, T., Futaguchi, M., Hashimoto, G. L., et al. 2017, Nature Geoscience, 10, 85 Gierasch, P. J., Goody, R. M., Young, R. E., et al. 1997, The General Circulation of the Venus Atmosphere: an Assessment, ed. S. W. Bougher, D. M. Hunten, & R. J. Phillips (University of Arizona Press), 459 Gorinov, D. A., Khatuntsev, I. V., Zasova, L. V., Turin, A. V., & Piccioni, G. 2018, Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 2554 Grinspoon, D. H., Pollack, J. B., Sitton, B. R., et al. 1993, Planetary and Space Science, 41, 515 Hahn, G., & Jacquesson, M. 2012, WinJUPOS-Database for object positions on planets and the Sun, http://jupos.privat.t-online.de, , Horinouchi, T., Murakami, S.-y., Kouyama, T., et al. 2017a, Measurement Science and Technology, 28, 085301 Horinouchi, T., Murakami, S., Satoh, T., et al. 2017b, Nature Geoscience, 10, 646 Horinouchi, T., Kouyama, T., Lee, Y. J., et al. 2018, Earth, Planets, and Space, 70, 10 Huang, H., Yoo, S., Yu, D., Huang, D., & Qin, H. 2012, in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining, MDMKDD '12 (New York, NY, USA: ACM), 1 -- 9. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2343862.2343863 Hueso, R., Peralta, J., Garate-Lopez, I., Bandos, T. V., & S´anchez-Lavega, A. 2015, Planetary and Space Science, 113, 78 Hueso, R., Peralta, J., & S´anchez-Lavega, A. 2012, Icarus, 217, 585 Jun, L., & Fengxian, Z. 1992, Advances in Space Research, 12, 123 Khatuntsev, I. V., Patsaeva, M. V., Titov, D. V., et al. 2017, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 122, 2312 -- . 2013, Icarus, 226, 140 Knollenberg, R. G., & Hunten, D. M. 1980, Journal of Geophysical Research, 85, 8039 Kouyama, T., Imamura, T., Nakamura, M., Satoh, T., & Futaana, Y. 2012, Planetary and Space Science, 60, 207 -- . 2013, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 118, 37 Kouyama, T., Imamura, T., Taguchi, M., et al. 2017, Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 12,098, 2017GL075792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075792 Kuglin, C. D. 1975, in Proc.International Conference on Cyber-netics Society, 163 -- 165. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/20001697044/en/ Kuglin, C. D. 1976, Performance of the Phase Correlator in Image Guidance Applications, Tech. rep., CONTROL DATA CORP MINNEAPOLIS MN IMAGE SYSTEMS DIV, Palo Alto Research Lab., Lockheed Missiles and Space Company, Inc., Palo Alto, California Lee, Y. J., Imamura, T., Schroder, S. E., & Marcq, E. 2015a, Icarus, 253, 1 Lee, Y. J., Titov, D. V., Ignatiev, N. I., et al. 2015b, Planetary and Space Science, 113, 298 Lee, Y. J., Sawaga, H., Sato, T. M., et al. 2017a, in Abstracts of JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017, PPS06 -- P18 Lee, Y. J., Yamazaki, A., Imamura, T., et al. 2017b, The Astronomical Journal, 154, 44 Leese, J. A., Novak, C. S., & Taylor, V. R. 1970, Pattern Recognition, 2, 279 Limaye, S., Warell, J., Bhatt, B. C., Fry, P. M., & Young, E. F. 2006, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 34, 189 Limaye, S. S. 2007, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 112, E04S09 Limaye, S. S., Watanabe, S., Yamazaki, A., et al. 2018, Earth, Planets, and Space, 70, 38. https://link. springer.com/article/10.1186/s40623-018-0789-5 Marcq, E., Bertaux, J.-L., Montmessin, F., & Belyaev, D. 2013, Nature Geoscience, 6, 25 Humblot, F., Collin, B., & Mohammad-Djafari, A. 2005, in McGouldrick, K., Baines, K. H., Momary, T. W., & Physics in Signal and Image Processing (PSIP) conference, PSIP '05, Toulouse, France, 115 -- 120 Grinspoon, D. H. 2008, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 113, E00B14 20 Peralta et al. McGouldrick, K., Momary, T. W., Baines, K. H., & Grinspoon, D. H. 2012, Icarus, 217, 615 McGouldrick, K., & Toon, O. B. 2007, Icarus, 191, 1 -- . 2008, Icarus, 196, 35 McGouldrick, K., & Tsang, C. C. C. 2017, Icarus, 286, 118 Moroz, V. I., & Zasova, L. V. 1997, Advances in Space Research, 19, 1191 Piccioni, G., Drossart, P., Suetta, E., et al., eds. 2007, ESA Special Publication, Vol. 1295, VIRTIS: The Visible and Infrared Thermal Imaging Spectrometer Rayner, J. T., Toomey, D. W., Onaka, P. M., et al. 2003, The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 115, 362 Reddy, B. S., & Chatterji, B. N. 1996, IEEE Transactions Mota Machado, P., Peralta, J., Luz, D., et al. 2016, in on Image Processing, 5, 1266 AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 48, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, 115.06 Nakamura, M., Imamura, T., Ishii, N., et al. 2016, Earth, Planets and Space, 68, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0457-6 Ogohara, K., Kouyama, T., Yamamoto, H., et al. 2012, Icarus, 217, 661 Ogohara, K., Takagi, M., Murakami, S.-y., et al. 2017, Earth, Planets, and Space, 69, 167 Parish, H. F., Schubert, G., Covey, C., et al. 2011, Icarus, 212, 42 Peralta, J., Hueso, R., & S´anchez-Lavega, A. 2007, Icarus, 190, 469 Peralta, J., Imamura, T., Read, P. L., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 213, 18. http://stacks.iop.org/0067-0049/213/i=1/a=18 Peralta, J., Lee, Y. J., McGouldrick, K., et al. 2017a, Icarus, 288, 235 Peralta, J., Luz, D., Berry, D. L., et al. 2012, Icarus, 220, 958 Peralta, J., Lee, Y. J., Hueso, R., et al. 2017b, Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 3907, 2017GL072900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072900 Peralta, J., Hueso, R., S´anchez-Lavega, A., et al. 2017c, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0187 Rossow, W. B., del Genio, A. D., & Eichler, T. 1990, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 47, 2053 Samritjiarapon, O., & Chitsobhuk, O. 2008, in 2008 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies, 364 -- 367 S´anchez-Lavega, A., Lebonnois, S., Imamura, T., Read, P., & Luz, D. 2017, Space Science Reviews, 212, 1541 S´anchez-Lavega, A., Hueso, R., Piccioni, G., et al. 2008, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, 13204 Satoh, T., Nakamura, M., Ueno, M., et al. 2016, Earth, Planets, and Space, 68, 74 Satoh, T., Sato, T. M., Nakamura, M., et al. 2017, Earth, Planets, and Space, 69, 154 Schubert, G. 1983, General circulation and the dynamical state of the Venus atmosphere, ed. D. M. Hunten, L. Colin, T. M. Donahue, & V. I. Moroz (University of Arizona Press), 681 -- 765 Takagi, M., Sugimoto, N., Ando, H., & Matsuda, Y. 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 123, 335 Takagi, S., & Iwagami, N. 2011, Earth, Planets, and Space, 63, 435 Tavenner, T., Young, E. F., Bullock, M. A., Murphy, J., & Coyote, S. 2008, Planetary and Space Science, 56, 1435 Titov, D. V., Svedhem, H., Koschny, D., et al. 2006, Planetary and Space Science, 54, 1279
1004.1000	1	1004	2010-04-07T04:29:04	Simulations for Terrestrial Planet Formation	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We investigate the formation of terrestrial planets in the late stage of planetary formation using two-planet model. At that time, the protostar has formed for about 3 Myr and the gas disk has dissipated. In the model, the perturbations from Jupiter and Saturn are considered. We also consider variations of the mass of outer planet, and the initial eccentricities and inclinations of embryos and planetesimals. Our results show that, terrestrial planets are formed in 50 Myr, and the accretion rate is about 60% - 80%. In each simulation, 3 - 4 terrestrial planets are formed inside "Jupiter" with masses of $0.15 - 3.6 M_{\oplus}$. In the 0.5 - 4AU, when the eccentricities of planetesimals are excited, planetesimals are able to accrete material from wide radial direction. The plenty of water material of the terrestrial planet in the Habitable Zone may be transferred from the farther places by this mechanism. Accretion may also happen a few times between two giant planets only if the outer planet has a moderate mass and the small terrestrial planet could survive at some resonances over time scale of $10^8$ yr.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Icy Bodies of the Solar System Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 263, 2009 Julio A. Fernandez,Daniela Lazzaro, & Dina Prialnik-Kovetz c(cid:13) 2009 International Astronomical Union DOI: 00.0000/X000000000000000X Simulations for Terrestrial Planets Formation Jianghui JI1, and Niu ZHANG1,2, 1Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China 2Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049 email: [email protected] Abstract. We investigate the formation of terrestrial planets in the late stage of planetary formation using two-planet model. At that time, the protostar has formed for about 3 Myr and the gas disk has dissipated. In the model, the perturbations from Jupiter and Saturn are considered. We also consider variations of the mass of outer planet, and the initial eccentricities and inclinations of embryos and planetesimals. Our results show that, terrestrial planets are formed in 50 Myr, and the accretion rate is about 60% - 80%. In each simulation, 3 - 4 terrestrial planets are formed inside "Jupiter" with masses of 0.15 − 3.6M⊕. In the 0.5 - 4AU, when the eccentricities of planetesimals are excited, planetesimals are able to accrete material from wide radial direction. The plenty of water material of the terrestrial planet in the Habitable Zone may be transferred from the farther places by this mechanism. Accretion may also happen a few times between two giant planets only if the outer planet has a moderate mass and the small terrestrial planet could survive at some resonances over time scale of 108 yr. Keywords. methods:n-body simulations-planetary systems-planetary formation 1. Introduction The discovery of the extrasolar planets (Mayor & Queloz 1995; Lee & Peale 2002; Ji et al. 2003) around solar-type stars indeed provides substantial clues for the forma- tion and origin of our own solar system. According to standard theory (Safronov 1969; Wetherill 1990; Lissauer 1993), it is generally believed that planet formation may expe- rience such several stages: in the early stage, the dust grains condense to grow km-sized planetesimals; in the middle stage, Moon-to-Mars sized embryos are created by accretion of planetesimals. When the embryos grow up to a core of ∼ 10M⊕, runaway accretion may take place. With more gases accreted onto the solid core, the embryos become more massive and eventually collapse to produce giant Jovian planets (Ida & Lin 2004). At the end of the stage, it is around that the protostar has formed for about 3 Myr, the gas disk has dissipated. A few larger bodies with low e and i are in crowds of planetesimals with certain eccentricities and inclinations. In the late stage, the terrestrial embryos are excited to high eccentricity orbits by mutual gravitational perturbation. Next, the orbital crossings make planets obtain material in wider radial area. In this sense, solid residue is either scattered out of the planetary system or accreted by the massive planet, even being captured (Nagasawa & Ida 2000) at the resonance position of the giant planets. Chambers (2001) made a study of terrestrial planet formation in the late stage by nu- merical simulations, who set 150 − 160 Moon-to-Mars size planetary embryos in the area of 0.3 − 2.0 AU under mutual interactions from Jupiter and Saturn. He also examined two initial mass distributions: approximately uniform masses, and a bimodal mass distri- bution. The results show that 2 − 4 planets are formed within 50 Myr, and finally survive over 200 Myr timescale, and the final planets usually have eccentric orbits with higher 1 0 1 0 2 r p A 7 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 0 0 0 1 . 4 0 0 1 : v i X r a 2 Ji & Zhang eccentricities and inclinations . Raymond, Quinn & Lunine (2004, 2006) also investigated the formation of terrestrial planets. In the simulations, they simply took into account Jupiter's gravitational perturbation, and the distribution of material are in 0.5 − 4.5 AU. Their results confirm a leading hypothesis for the origin of Earth's water: they may come from the material in the outer area by impacts in the late stage of planet formation. Raymond, Mandell, & Sigurdsson (2006) explored the planet formation under planetary migration of the giant. In the simulations, super Hot Earth form interior to the migrating giant planet, and water-rich, Earth-size terrestrial planet are present in the Habitable Zone (0.8 − 1.5 AU) and can survive over 108 yr timescale. In our work, we consider two-planet model, in which Jupiter and Saturn are supposed to be already formed, with two swarms of planetesimals distributed in the region among 0.5 − 4.2 AU and 6.2 − 9.6 AU respectively. The initial eccentricities and inclinations of planetesimals are considered. We also vary the mass of Saturn to examine how the small bodies evolve. The simulations are performed on longer timescale 400 Myr in order to check the stability and the dynamical structure evolution of the system. In the following, we briefly summarize our numerical setup and results . 2. Numerical Setup The timescale for formation of Jupiter-like planets is usually considered to be less than 10 Myr (Briceno 2001), the formation scenario of planet embryos is related to their heliocentric distances and the initial mass of the star nebular. If we adopt the model of 1.5 MMSN (Minimum Mass Solar Nebular), the upper bound of the timescale for Jupiter-like planet formation corresponds to the timescale for embryo formation at 2.5 AU (Kokubo & Ida 2002), which is just at 3 : 1 resonance location of Jupiter. In the region 2.5 − 4.2 AU, embryos will be cleared off by strong perturbation from Jupiter. There should be some much smaller solid residue among Jupiter and Saturn, even though the clearing effect may throw out most of the material in this area. We set embryos simply in the region 0.5 − 2.5 AU and planetesimals at 0.5 − 4.2 AU and 6.2 − 9.6 AU. We adopt the surface density profile as follows (Raymond, Quinn & Lunine 2004): Σ(r) = (cid:26) Σ1r−3/2, Σsnow( r 5AU )−3/2, r < snow line, r > snow line. (2.1) In (2.1), Σsnow = 4 g/cm2 is the surface density at snowline, where the snowline is at 2.5 AU with Σ1 = 10 g/cm2. The mass of planetary embryos is proportional to the width of the feeding zone, which is associated with Hill Radius, RH , so the mass of an embryo increases as The embryos in the 0.5 − 2.5 AU are spaced by Λ (Λ varying randomly between 2 and 5) mutual Hill Radii, RH,m, which is defined as Membryo ∝ rΣ(r)RH (2.2) RH,m = ( a1 + a2 2 )( m1 + m2 3M⊙ )1/3 (2.3) where a1,2 and m1,2 are the semi-major axes and masses of the embryos respectively. Replacing RH in (2.2) with RH,m, and substituting (2.1) in (2.2), then, we achieve a relation law between the mass of embryos and the parameter Λ as Membryo ∝ rΣ(r)RH,m ∝ r3/4Λ3/2Σ3/2 (2.4) Here, we equally set the masses of planetesimals inside and outside Jupiter, respec- Terrestrial Planets Formation 3 e e e 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 Myr 1 / 3 1 / 2 2 / 3 0.1 Myr 1 Myr 10 Myr 50 Myr 400 Myr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a(AU) a(AU) e e e 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 Myr 1 3 / 1 2 / 2 3 / 0.1 Myr 1 Myr 10 Myr 50 Myr 400 Myr 3 2 / 2 1 / 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a(AU) a(AU) Log(Water Mass Fraction) Log(Water Mass Fraction) −5 −4 −3 −2 −1.3 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1.3 Figure 1. Left panel : (a) Snapshot of simulation 2a with MSaturn = 5M⊕. The total mass of embryos is 2.4M⊕, the masses of planetesimals inside Jupiter are 0.0317M⊕, and those outside Jupiter are 0.0375M⊕. Planetesimals among Jupiter and Saturn were nonself-gravitational (see Section 2.1). Note the size of each object is relative, and the value bar is log of water mass fraction. Right panel : (b) snapshot for similuation 2b. tively. Consequently, the number distribution of the planetesimals is simply required to meet N ∝ r−1/2. Additionally, we remain the total number of planetesimals and embryos inside Jupiter, and the number of planetesimals outside Jupiter both equal to 200. The mass inside and outside Jupiter is equal to be 7.5M⊕. The eccentricities and inclinations vary in (0 − 0.02) and (0 − 0.05◦), respectively. The mass of Saturn in simulations 1a/1b, 2a/2b and 3a/3b are 0.5M⊕, 5M⊕, 50M⊕ respectively. Each simulations marked by label a (or b) is run to consider (not consider) self-gravitation of planetesimals among giants. We use the hybrid symplectic integrator (Chambers 1999) in MERCURY package to integrate all the simulations. In addition, we adopt 6 days as the length of time step, which is a twentieth period of the innermost body at 0.5 AU. All runs are carried out over 400 Myr time scale. At the end of the intergration, the changes of energy and angular momenta are 10−3 and 10−11 respectively. Six simulations are performed on a workstation composed of 12 CPUs with 1.2 GHz, and each costs roughly 45 days. 3. Results Fig. 1(a) is a snapshot of simulation 2a. At 0.1 Myr, it is clear that the planetesimals are excited at the 3 : 2 (3.97 AU),2 : 1 (3.28 AU) and 3 : 1 (2.5 AU) resonance positions with Jupiter, and this is quite similar to the Kirkwood gaps of the main asteroidal belt in solar system. For about 1 Myr, planetesimals and embryos are deeply intermixed, where most of the bodies have stirred to be large eccentricities. Collisions and accretions frequently emerge among planetesimals and embryos. This process continues until about 50 Myr, and the planetary embryos are mostly generated. The formation timescale of embryos is in accordance with that of (Ida & Lin 2004). Finally, inside Jupiter, 3 terrestrial planets are formed with masses of 0.15 − 3.6M⊕. However, at the outer region, the planetesimals are continuously scattered out of the system at 0.1 Myr. For about 10 Myr, there are no survivals except at some resonances with the giant planet. As shown in the Figure, there is a small body at the 1 : 2 resonance with Jupiter. Due to scattering amongst planetesimals, Jupiter (Saturn) migrates inward (outward) 0.13 AU (1.19 AU) toward the sun respectively. Such kind of migration agrees with the work of Fernandez et al. (Fernandez & Ip 1984) Hence, the 2 : 5 mean motion resonance is destroyed, then the ratios of periods between Jupiter and Saturn degenerate to 1 : 3. Therefore, the ratio of 4 Ji & Zhang Table 1. Properties of terrestrial planets from different systems ¯i(◦) System accretion rate n ¯m(m⊕) concentration ¯e 1a 1b 2a 2b 3a 3b 1a-3b solar 3 3 3 4 3 3 1.8313 73.2518% 2.0096 80.3853% 1.4958 59.8322% 1.3683 72.9779% 1.6277 65.1098% 66.9694% 1.6742 69.7544% 3.2 1.6678 0.4943 - 4 0.4606 0.4262 0.8116 0.4299 0.5337 0.5040 0.5276 0.5058 0.1381 7.6963 0.0937 1.7790 0.2108 16.9117 0.0999 5.1415 0.2063 5.9153 0.1839 5.2447 0.1554 7.1148 0.0764 3.0624 periods for Jupiter, small body and Saturn is approximate to 1 : 2 : 3. In the 0.5 − 4 AU, when the eccentricities of planetesimals are excited, planetesimals are able to accrete material from wide radial direction. The plenty of water material of the terrestrial planet in the Habitable Zone may be transferred from the farther places by this mechanism. Fig. 1(b) is illustrated for simulation 2b. In comparison with Fig. 1(a), it is apparent that planetesimals are excited more quickly at the 3 : 2 (3.97 AU), 2 : 1 (3.28 AU) and 3 : 1 (2.5 AU) resonance location with Jupiter. The several characteristic timescales are the same as simulation 2a for the bodies within Jupiter. 4 planets are formed in simulation 2b, the changes of position of Jupiter and Saturn behaves like simulation 2a. We point out that simulations 2a and 2b share the initial conditions, but the only difference in them is whether we consider the self-gravitation among the outer planetesimals. There is a little gathered planetesimals survival over 400 Myr among 7 − 8 AU, located in the area of 2 : 3 (6.63 AU) and 1 : 2 (8.03 AU) resonances with Jupiter. The detailed results for whole simulations that the reader may refer to (Zhang & Ji 2009). The production efficiency of the terrestrial planet in our model is high, and the accre- tion rate inside Jupiter is 60% − 80% in the simulations. 3 − 4 terrestrial planets formed in 50 Myr. 5 of 6 simulations have a terrestrial planet in the Habitable Zone (0.8 − 1.5 AU). The planetary systems are formed to have nearly circular orbit and coplanarity, similar to the solar system (see Table 1). We suppose that the above characteristics are correlated with the initial small eccentricities and inclinations. The concentration in Ta- ble 1 means the ratio of maximum terrestrial planet formed in the simulation and the total terrestrial planets mass. It represents different capability on accretion. The average value of this parameter is similar to the solar system. Considering the self-gravitation of planetesimals among Jupiter and Saturn, the system has a better viscosity, so that the planetesimals will be excited slower. The consideration of self-gravitation may not change the formation time scale of terrestrial planets, but will affect the initial accretion speed and the eventual accretion rate. 4. Summary and Discussion We simulate the terrestrial planets formation by using two-planet model. In the simula- tion, the variations of the mass of outer planet, the initial eccentricities and inclinations of embryos and planetesimals are also considered. The results show that, during the terrestrial planets formation, planets can accrete material from different regions inside Jupiter. Among 0.5 − 4.2 AU, the accretion rate of terrestrial planet is 60% − 80%, i.e., about 20% − 40% initial mass is removed during the progress. The planetesimals will improve the efficiency of accretion rate for certain initial eccentricities and inclinations, and this also makes the newly-born terrestrial planets have lower orbital eccentricities. Terrestrial Planets Formation 5 It is maybe a common phenomenon in the planet formation that the water-rich terres- trial planet is formed in the Habitable Zone. The structure, which is similar to that of solar system, may explain the results of disintegration of a terrestrial planet. Most of the planetesimals among Jupiter and Saturn are scattered out of the planetary systems, and this migration caused by scattering (Fernandez & Ip 1984) or long-term orbital evolution can make planets capture at some mean motion resonance location. Accretion could also happen a few times between two planets if the outer planet has a moderate mass, and the small terrestrial planet could survive at some resonances over 108 yr time scale. Struc- turally, Saturn has little effect on the architecture inside Jupiter, owing to its protection. However, obviously, a different Saturn mass could play a vital role of the structure outer Jupiter. Jupiter and Saturn in the solar system may form over the same period. Acknowledgements This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grants 10973044, 10833001, 10573040, 10673006, ) and the Foundation of Minor Planets of Purple Mountain Observatory. References Briceno, C. et al., 2001, Science, 291, 93 Chambers, J. E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793 Chambers, J. E. 2001, Icarus, 152, 205 Fernandez, J. A., & Ip, W. H. 1984, Icarus, 58, 109 Ida, S., & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ, 604, 388 Ji, J. H., et al.2003, ApJ, 585, L139 Kokubo, E., & Ida, S. 2002, ApJ, 581, 666 Lee, M. H., & Peale, S. J. 2002, ApJ, 567, 596 Lissauer, J.J. 1993, ARAA, 31, 129 Nagasawa, M., & Ida, S. 2000,AJ, 120, 3311 Raymond, S. N., Quinn, T., & Lunine, J. I. 2004, Icarus, 168, 1 Raymond, S. N., Quinn, T., & Lunine, J. I. 2006, Icarus, 183, 265 Raymond, S. N., Mandell, A. M., & Sigurdsson, S. 2006, Science, 313, 1413 Safronov,V.S. 1969, Evolution of the Protoplanetary Cloud and Formation of the Earth and the Planets (Moscow:Nauka) Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355 Wetherill, G. W. 1990, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet Sci., 18, 205 Zhang N., Ji J., 2009, Science in China Series G, 52(5), 794
1711.05185	1	1711	2017-11-14T16:44:41	ALMA continuum observations of the protoplanetary disk AS 209. Evidence of multiple gaps opened by a single planet	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	The paper presents new high angular resolution ALMA 1.3 mm dust continuum observations of the protoplanetary system AS 209 in the Ophiuchus star forming region. The dust continuum emission is characterized by a main central core and two prominent rings at $r = 75\,$au and $r = 130\,$au intervaled by two gaps at at $r = 62\,$au and $r = 103\,$au. The two gaps have different widths and depths, with the inner one being narrower and shallower. We determined the surface density of the millimeter dust grains using the 3D radiative transfer disk code \textsc{dali}. According to our fiducial model the inner gap is partially filled with millimeter grains while the outer gap is largely devoid of dust. The inferred surface density is compared to 3D hydrodynamical simulations (FARGO-3D) of planet-disk interaction. The outer dust gap is consistent with the presence of a giant planet ($M_{\rm planet} \sim 0.8\,M_{\rm Staturn}$); the planet is responsible for the gap opening and for the pile-up of dust at the outer edge of the planet orbit. The simulations also show that the same planet can give origin to the inner gap at $r = 62\,$au. The relative position of the two dust gaps is close to the 2:1 resonance and we have investigated the possibility of a second planet inside the inner gap. The resulting surface density (including location, width and depth of the two dust gaps) are in agreement with the observations. The properties of the inner gap pose a strong constraint to the mass of the inner planet ($M_{\rm planet} < 0.1\,M_{\rm J}$). In both scenarios (single or pair of planets), the hydrodynamical simulations suggest a very low disk viscosity ($\alpha < 10^{-4}$). Given the young age of the system (0.5 - 1 Myr), this result implies that the formation of giant planets occurs on a timescale of $\lesssim$ 1\,Myr.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. as209 November 15, 2017 c(cid:13)ESO 2017 ALMA continuum observations of the protoplanetary disk AS 209 Evidence of multiple gaps opened by a single planet D. Fedele1, M. Tazzari2, R. Booth2, L. Testi3, C. J. Clarke2, I. Pascucci4, A. Kospal5, D. Semenov6, S. Bruderer, Th. Henning6, and R. Teague6 1 INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, L.go E. Fermi 5, I-50125 Firenze, Italy 2 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 3 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, 85748, Garching bei Muenchen, Germany 4 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 5 Konkoly Observatory, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Konkoly-Thege Mik- lós út 15-17, 1121 Budapest, Hungary 6 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Königstuhl 17, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany Received ...; accepted ... ABSTRACT The paper presents new high angular resolution ALMA 1.3 mm dust continuum observations of the protoplanetary system AS 209 in the Ophiuchus star forming region. The dust continuum emission is characterized by a main central core and two prominent rings at r = 75 au and r = 130 au intervaled by two gaps at at r = 62 au and r = 103 au. The two gaps have different widths and depths, with the inner one being narrower and shallower. We determined the surface density of the millimeter dust grains using the 3D radiative transfer disk code dali. According to our fiducial model the inner gap is partially filled with millimeter grains while the outer gap is largely devoid of dust. The inferred surface density is compared to 3D hydrodynamical simulations (FARGO-3D) of planet-disk interaction. The outer dust gap is consistent with the presence of a giant planet (Mplanet ∼ 0.8 MStaturn); the planet is responsible for the gap opening and for the pile-up of dust at the outer edge of the planet orbit. The simulations also show that the same planet can give origin to the inner gap at r = 62 au. The relative position of the two dust gaps is close to the 2:1 resonance and we have investigated the possibility of a second planet inside the inner gap. The resulting surface density (including location, width and depth of the two dust gaps) are in agreement with the observations. The properties of the inner gap pose a strong constraint to the mass of the inner planet (Mplanet < 0.1 MJ). In both scenarios (single or pair of planets), the hydrodynamical simulations suggest a very low disk viscosity (α < 10−4). Given the young age of the system (0.5 - 1 Myr), this result implies that the formation of giant planets occurs on a timescale of (cid:46) 1 Myr. Key words. giant planet formation – T Tauri 1. Introduction Axisymmetric gaps and rings such as those seen in the pro- toplanetary disks around HL Tau, TW Hya, HD163296, HD 169142, AA Tau (e.g. ALMA Partnership et al. 2015; Andrews et al. 2016; Isella et al. 2016; Fedele et al. 2017; Loomis et al. 2017) can now regularly be unveiled by the extremely high res- olution available with ALMA. The formation of gaps and rings in disks can be due to several mechanisms such as: planet for- mation (e.g., Papaloizou & Lin 1984); magneto-rotational in- stability (Flock et al. 2015); condensation fronts (Zhang et al. 2015); dust sintering (Okuzumi et al. 2016); photoevaporation (Ercolano et al. 2017). The rings observed by ALMA show that the millimeter dust grains are radially confined regions in which inward radial mi- gration is slowed down or stopped and so may be key to explain- ing the retention of large grains in disks on long (2 − 3 Myr) timescales (irrespective of the mechanism producing such "dust traps"). In addition, dust traps provide the ideal environment in which to observationally constrain models of grain growth be- cause – in contrast to other regions of the disk – they are re- gions in which radial drift is relatively unimportant, allowing dust to grow in situ (Pinilla et al. 2012). Given a measure of the local dust density, the timescale for dust growth to a given size is readily obtained from grain growth models (e.g., Birn- stiel et al. 2012). Empirical measurement of the maximum grain size in traps would thus provide the cleanest test of the various assumptions (sticking probability, turbulent velocity, fragmenta- tion threshold) that enter these models. This paper presents new ALMA 1.3 mm continuum observa- tions of the T Tauri disk AS 209 where axisymmetric gaps and rings are detected. AS 209 (M(cid:63) = 0.9 M(cid:12), spectral type K5, L(cid:63) = 1.5 L(cid:12), Tazzari et al. 2016) is part of the young (age ∼ 0.5 − 1.0 Myr Natta et al. 2006) Ophiuchus star forming re- gion at a distance of 126 pc from the Sun (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016). Multi-frequency continuum observations revealed Article number, page 1 of 9 7 1 0 2 v o N 4 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 5 8 1 5 0 . 1 1 7 1 : v i X r a A&A proofs: manuscript no. as209 Fig. 1. ALMA 1.3 mm dust continuum image (uniform weighting). The main substructures are highlighted in the right panel. optically thin emission at millimeter wavelenghts beyond a few 10s of au from the star (Pérez et al. 2012; Tazzari et al. 2016). Huang et al. (2016) found evidence of an extended gas emis- sion (C18O) speculating that it is due to external CO desorption in the outer disk. Interestingly, Huang et al. (2017) noticed the presence of a dark lane in the dust 1.1 mm continuum emission. The structure of the paper is the following: observations and data reduction are presented in section 2 and the results are discussed in section 3. The data analysis is described in Section 4. Sec- tion 5 provides a comparison to hydrodynamical simulations. Discussion and conclusion are reported in sec. 6. 2. Observations and Data reduction The ALMA observations of AS 209 (J2000: R.A. = 16h49m15.296s, DEC = –14◦22(cid:48)09.02(cid:48)(cid:48)) have been performed on 2016 September 22 (with 38 antennas) and 26 (41 antennas) in band 6 (211–275 GHz) as part of the project ID 2015.1.00486.S (PI: D. Fedele). The correlator setup includes a broad (2 GHz bandwidth) spectral window centered at 230 GHz. Visibilities were taken in two execution blocks with a 6.05s in- tegration time per visibility totalling 40 minutes, per block, on- source. System temperatures were between 80− 145 K. Weather conditions on the dates of observation gave an average precip- itable water vapour of 2.2 and 2.3 mm, respectively. Calibration was done with J1517−2422 as bandpass calibrator, J1733−1304 as phase and flux the flux calibrator. The visibilities were subse- quently time binned to 60s integration times per visibility for self-calibration, imaging, and analysis. Self-calibration was per- formed using the 233 GHz continuum TDM spectral window with DA41 as the reference antenna. The continuum image was created using casa.clean (casa ver- sion 4.7); after trying different weighting schemes, we opted for a uniform weight which yields a synthesised beam of 0(cid:48)(cid:48).19 × 0(cid:48)(cid:48).14 (PA = 75.5◦). The peak flux is 13 mJy beam−1 and the r.m.s. is 0.1 mJy beam−1. Article number, page 2 of 9 3. Results The ALMA 1.3 mm dust continuum image is shown in Fig. 1: the continuum emission is characterized by a bright central emis- sion and two weaker dust rings peaking at ∼ 75 au and 130 au, respectively. The two rings have a similar peak flux (∼ 2 mJy). The rings are intervaled by two narrow gaps. The two gaps have different widths and depths. The radial intensity profile shows a kink around 20 − 30 au which may be the signature of another (spatially unresolved) dust gap. Finally, the continuum flux does not drop to zero at the edge of the outer ring as there is a tenuous emission extending out to ∼ 170−180 au. The different disk sub- structures are clearly visible in the radial intensity profile shown in Fig. 2. 3.1. Characterization of the brightness profile In this section we present here the fit of the observed visibil- ities, which provides an initial characterization of the disk sur- face brightness useful for the detailed physical modelling carried out in Section 4. We assume an axisymmetric brigthness profile defined as follows: (cid:33)φ1 (cid:32) R Rc − (cid:32) R Rc (cid:33)φ2 , I(R) = δ(R) I0 exp where I0 is a normalization, Rc is a scale length and δ(R) is a scaling factor (by definition δ(R) > 0) parametrized as: for R ∈ [RG1 − hwG1, RG1 + hwG1] for R ∈ [RG1 + hwG1, RG2 − hwG2] for R ∈ [RG2 − hwG2, RG2 + hwG2] for R ∈ [RG2 + hwG2, RR2,out] for R ≥ RR2,out otherwise δG1 δR1 δG2 δR2 δout 1 δ(R) =  (1) (2) D. Fedele et al.: ALMA continuum observations of the protoplanetary disk AS 209 Fig. 2. Radial intensity profile of the 1.3, mm dust continuum emission. The profile is azimuthally averaged after deprojecting for the disk incli- nation (i = 36◦, Sect. 3). The black line shows the mean profile while the shadowed regions indicate the standard deviation along the azimuth angle. Table 1. Parameter space explored by the Markov chains and best-fit values Parameter I0 [mJy/beam] Rc [au] φ1 φ2 RG1 [au] hwG1 [au] δG1 δR1 RG2 [au] hwG2 [au] δG2 δR2 RR2,out [au] δout i [◦] PA [◦] Min Max 100 150 4 4 80 30 1 3 110 30 1 20 180 2 90 180 0 20 -4 -4 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 130 0 0 0 Best-fit 7.4 ± 0.2 80 ± 1 -0.24 ± 0.01 2.19 ± 0.02 61.7 ± 0.5 8.0 ± 0.2 0.03 ± 0.005 0.80 ± 0.02 103.2 ± 0.4 15.6 ± 0.2 0.025 ± 0.005 4.8 ± 0.1 139.8 ± 0.8 1.95 ± 0.03 35.3 ± 0.8 86.0 ± 0.7 where RG and hwG are the center and half width of the dust gaps, respectively. The choice of this particular brightness pro- file serves as a simple realization of an "unperturbed" profile (an exponentially tapered power law), characterized by a few radial regions that can depart from it either due to an excess (δ > 1) or a lack (δ < 1) of emission. Following the evidence emerging from the synthesized image (Fig. 1), we allow for two rings, two gaps, and an outer disk region, following nomenclature in Fig. 1. In this framework, a gap in the disk is naturally modelled with δ < 1. We perform the fit of the visibilities with a Bayesian ap- proach using the Monte Carlo Markov chains ensemble sampler Fig. 3. Dust surface density of the dali fiducial model. The dashed line corresponds to the initial unperturbed profile (power-law with exponen- tial tail). (Goodman & Weare 2010) implemented in the emcee package (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2013). We assume flat priors for all the free parameters. Table 1 reports the ranges explored for each pa- rameter. We also fit simultaneously for the disk inclination i, the East- of-North position angle PA, and phase center offset (∆α, ∆δ). For each set of values of the free parameters we compute a syn- thetic image of the model assuming axisimmetry and we use the galario library (Tazzari et al. 2017) to compute the synthetic vis- ibilities (by sampling the Fourier transform of the model image in all the observed (u, v)-points) and the resulting χ2 as N(cid:88) j=0 χ2 = Vobs(u j, v j) − Vmod(u j, v j)2w j , (3) where w j is the weight of the observed (u j, v j) visibility point. The posterior of each model is then computed as exp(−χ2/2) and sampled with 80 chains for 45000 steps (after 5000 burn- in steps). The chains, which reached a good convergence, are shown in Fig. A.2 in Appendix A, in the form of marginalized 1D and 2D distributions. The parameters that we infer from the fit of the visibilities are presented in Table 1: for each parameter, we estimate its value as the median of the marginalized distribution and its uncertainty as half the interval between 16% and 84% percentiles. We find that the 1.3 mm continuum brightness distribution of AS 209 can be explained very well by a profile with two deep gaps (δG1 ∼ 0.03, δG2 ∼ 0.025) at 62 and 103 au, respectively, and an excess ring (δR2 ∼ 4) at ∼ 130 au. The excellent agree- ment of this profile with the observations is apparent in Fig. A.1, where the deprojected synthetic visibilities match the observed ones up to 1500kλ. Article number, page 3 of 9 Table 2. dali fiducial disk model A&A proofs: manuscript no. as209 Fixed Parameter M(cid:63) [M(cid:12)] Teff [K] L(cid:63) [L(cid:12)] d [pc] Rin [au] Rc [au] RG1 [au] hwG1 [au] RG2 [au] hwG [au] RR2,out [au] Rout [au] i [◦] PA [◦] χ, flarge ψ hc Variable Parameter Min Mdust [M(cid:12)] γ1 γ2 δG1 δR1 δG2 δR2 δout Value 0.9† 4250† 1.5† 126 0.1 80 62 8 103 16 140 200 35 86 0.2, 0.85 0.1† 0.133† Description stellar mass stellar temperature stellar luminosity stellar distance disk inner radius disk critical radius Gap 1 center Gap 1 half width Gap 2 center Gap 2 half width Ring 2 outer radius disk outer radius disk inclination disk position angle settling parameters flaring exponent scale height at Rc Max 5 · 10−4 1.0 3.0 Step 0.5 · 10−4 0.1 0.1 1 · 10−4 -1.0 1.0 (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20) 0.5 (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.1) 2 1 0.5 0.5 0.05 1.0 5 3 Fiducial 3.5 · 10−4 Disk dust mass 0.3 2.0 0.1 0.75 0.01 4.5 1.5 Σ(r) power-law exponent Σ(r) exponential-tail exponent Σdust,large scale factor in gap 1 Σdust,large scale factor in ring 1 Σdust,large scale factor in gap 2 Σdust,large scale factor in ring 2 Σdust,large scale factor in outer disk Notes. For each variable parameter we explored a range of values between a minimum (Min) and maximum (Max) in regular steps (step). In the case of δG1 and δG2 we explored non-linearly spaced values, so we list them in parenthesis. References: (†) Andrews et al. (2009) . 4. Analysis with a physical disk model In this Section we aim to characterize the structure of AS 209 in physical terms, starting from the observed 1.3mm continuum observation. This step is important to estimate the drop of the dust surface density inside the two gaps. For this purpose we use the dust radiative transfer code implemented into the thermo- chemical disk model dali (Dust and Lines, Bruderer et al. 2012; Bruderer 2013). Starting from an input radiation field and from a disk density structure, dali solves the two dimensional dust con- tinuum radiative transfer and determines the dust temperature and radiation field strength at each disk position. 4.1. Model description We adopt the characterization of the surface brightness presented in the previous Section as a first guess for the functional form and the location of the gaps to be used for the surface density of the physical disk model that we use in this Section. The dust surface density is: (cid:33)γ1 (cid:32) R Rc (cid:34) − exp (cid:33)γ2(cid:35) (cid:32) R Rc Σdust(R) = δ(R) Σc (4) where the surface density scaling factor (δ) is parametrized as in eq. 3.1. Article number, page 4 of 9 (cid:33)ψ (cid:32) R Rc h = hc In the vertical direction, the density follows a Gaussian distribu- tion with scale height h (= H/R) (5) with hc the critical scale height and ψ the flaring exponent. The critical scale height (hc = 0.13) and disk flaring (ψ = 0.1) are taken from Andrews et al. (2011). In the adopted version of dali, dust settling is included following D'Alessio et al. (2006), i.e., adopting two power-law grain size populations with different scale heights: the small grains have a scale height equal to h (similar to the gas) while the scale height of the large grains is χh (with χ < 1) to account for the settling of the large grains. Finally, the total dust mass is distributed between the two popu- lations and it is regulated by the parameter flarge (large-to-small mass ratio): thus, the dust surface density is Σdust · (1 − flarge) and Σdust · flarge for the small and large grains, respectively. The flaring parameters are fixed : χ = 0.2, flarge = 0.85. We fixed the grain size populations with a small population of sizes between 0.005 and 1 µm and a large one of sizes be- tween 0.005 and smax µm with both populations sharing the same power-law exponent (p = 3.5). The dust mass absorption coeffi- cients are taken from Andrews et al. (2011). The maximum grain size of the large dust population affects the dust opacity at millimeter wavelengths with the opacity decreas- ing by almost an order of magnitude going from smax = 0.8 mm D. Fedele et al.: ALMA continuum observations of the protoplanetary disk AS 209 Fig. 4. dali fiducial model, comparison of 1.3 mm continuum image. The model image is produced with casa.clean starting from the synthetic visibilities and adopting the same clean parameters as the observations. to 1.0 cm (e.g., Tazzari et al. 2016). This in turn has an impact the dust temperature and the total dust mass. In this paper we fix smax = 2000 µm in agreement with the multi-frequency contin- uum analysis of AS 209 by Tazzari et al. (2016). 4.2. Fiducial model We built a grid of dali disk models varying the following param- eters: • total dust mass • surface density power-law exponent (γ1) • exponential tail exponent (γ2) • dust density scaling factors The explored range of each variable parameter is listed in Ta- ble 2. The values of Rc, gaps centers (RG1, RG2) and gaps sizes (half width hwG1, hwG2) are taken from the best-fist results of the multi-components analysis. Each model is compared with the ALMA continuum observa- tion with the aim of defining a fiducial model for the dust sur- face density. The comparison is performed in the uv-plane: first we compute the synthetic 1.3 mm continuum image with dali, then the tool casa.simobserve is used to convert the image into synthetic visibilities at the same uv-positions as the observations. Finally we measure the χ2 between observation and model after deprojecting and binning the visibilities (bin size of 30 kλ). The fitting procedure is performed in multiple steps: first we vary the global disk properties, i.e. Mdust, γ1, γ2 until we find a good agreement with the visibilities at the shortest baselines which provides a constraint to the large scale structure. During this step the dust scaling factors are kept fixed: δG1 = 0, δG2 = 0, δR1 = 1, δR2 = 1, δout = 1. In a second step, we constrain the values of the scaling factors while keeping fixed Mdust, γ1, γ2. The process is repeated until convergence. This allows us to refine the grid resolution iteratively. The fiducial model is defined by the set of parameters that min- imize the χ2 between the observed and synthetic visibilities (eq. 3.1) within the explored parameter space. The parameters of the dali fiducial model are listed in Table 2. Figure 3 shows the dust surface density of the fiducial model and the model image is shown in Figure 4. We note that, in order to quantitatively reproduce the disk structure (gaps and rings) with DALI we need to set different dust scaling factors for the two gaps: δG1 ∼ 0.1 and δG2 ∼ 0.01. 5. Comparison to hydrodynamical simulations In this section we investigate the possibility that the gaps were produced by planets, as has been suggested for other disks, e.g. HL Tau, TW Hydra, HD 163296, and HD 169142 (ALMA Part- nership et al. 2015; Andrews et al. 2016; Isella et al. 2016; Fedele et al. 2017). To do this, we have run 2D simulations of planet-disk interaction using a version of FARGO-3D (Benítez- Llambay & Masset 2016) modified to include dust dynamics (Rosotti et al. 2016). The disk parameters were chosen to match the best fit model (see Table 3). The simulations were run us- ing a logarithmic radial grid, extending from 10 au to 300 au at a resolution of Nr × Nφ = 550 × 1024. Given the relative ex- pense of the hydrodynamic simulations, we have not conducted an exhaustive fit to the data, instead we investigate the typical planetary properties and disk conditions that produce reasonable gap structures. The key information available for constraining the planets properties are the gap width, depth and location. The position of the two gap centers (62 and 103 au) are close enough to the ratio of radii expected for two planets migrating together in 2:1 resonance (with semi-major axis ratio 0.63), which forms the starting point for our investigation. Starting from the relationship between the width of a gap opened by a planet and its mass derived by Rosotti et al. (2016), we al- ready see that the inner planet must be low mass due because the inner gap is narrow (just 16 au or approximately 2 – 3 pressure Article number, page 5 of 9 A&A proofs: manuscript no. as209 Fig. 5. Results of hydrodynamical simulations for the inviscid (left) and α = 10−4 (right) case. The black line corresponds to the dust surface density determined with dali (Sect. 4). The (red) dot-dashed line is the 1 mm grains surface density based on the single planet scenario with 0.2 MJ planet at 95 au injected after 0.65 Myr (Sect.5). The (blue) dot-dot-dashed and the (green) dashed curves corresponds to the two planets scenario with an inner planet of mass 0.05 MJ and 0.1 MJ, respectively. scale-heights). This suggests that the mass of the inner planet is in the Neptune mass regime (∼ 15 M⊕, i.e. 0.05 MJ). However, while Rosotti et al. (2016) showed that these planets can produce observable features, they found gap depths much smaller than the inner gap in AS 209. Nonetheless, the depth of the gap is sen- stive to disk viscosity, with planets opening deeper gaps in low viscosity disks (Crida et al. 2006; Zhu et al. 2013). Thus together with the gap width, the gap depth places constraints on both the planet mass and disk viscosity. Furthermore, at extremely low viscosity, Dong et al. (2017) and Bae et al. (2017) showed that planets may open multiple dust gaps in inviscid disks, which raises the interesting possibility that the gaps in AS 209 may be opened by a single planet. From the right panel of Fig. 5, we see that even a modest vis- cosity α = 10−4 is too high to produce deep enough gaps to explain the structures in AS 209. While a single 0.2 MJ planet at 95 au matches the width of the outer gap, the drop in dust sur- face density it is far too shallow compared to what is inferred. Although more massive planets can open deep enough gaps (for α = 10−4), they produce structures that are too wide and begin to prevent the inflow of dust entirely. This suggests that the outer gap is consistent with a 0.2 MJ planet, but requires even lower viscosity. The inviscid (α = 0) simulations produce a much better match to the inferred gap structure (Fig. 5, left panel). Already a single 0.2 MJ planet at 95 au is in remarkable agreement with the gap structure, producing a deep outer gap along with a second inner gap at approximately the the right location and with a reason- able width and depth. The depth of the gaps is not only sensitive to viscosity, but in the inviscid case it also increases with time, thus being a much weaker tracer of the planet mass than the po- sition of the peaks (as noted by Rosotti et al. 2016). However, Article number, page 6 of 9 the width of the gaps are similar in both the viscous and inviscid cases. Interestingly, the simulations produce an additional gap at around 35 au, which coincides with similar, but much smaller amplitude, feature in the radial intensity profile (Fig. 2). Given that the depth of this feature is dependent on parameters such as viscosity, and optical depth effects may further reduce the ampli- tude of variation in the observed intensity profile, it is possible that this inner structure is related to the presence of a planet near 100 au. Since low viscosity is required to reproduce the gap structure in AS 209, and in this case a single planet may produce both gaps, it is interesting to consider whether there still could be a second planet present. Thus we have re-run both the viscous and invis- cid simulations with an inner planets at 57 au, close to the 2:1 resonance with the outer planet. In both cases the planet mass is consistent with the estimate from the relationship between gap width and planet mass: a 0.05 MJ planet produces a negligible difference to the structure of the gaps and could thus be easily hidden in the gap. The largest planet mass compatible with the gap widths is roughly 0.1 MJ, with larger planet masses produc- ing a gap that is too wide in the inviscid case. While a slightly more massive planet may be compatible with the inner gap when α = 10−4, this is hard to reconcile with the need for a lower α in the outer gap. 6. Conclusions The ringed dust structure of AS 209 revealed by ALMA is con- sistent with the presence of a Saturn-like (Mplanet = 0.2MJ = 0.67 MSaturn) planet at r = 95 au. The planetary mass is con- strained by the width and depth of the dust gap: for the chosen gas properties, our hydrodynamical simulations indicate that less D. Fedele et al.: ALMA continuum observations of the protoplanetary disk AS 209 Table 3. Disk model used in the planet disk-interaction simulations Parameter Temperature Gas Surface Density Grain size Viscous α Value 190(R/100 au)−0.55 7.5(R/100 au)−1 1 mm 0, 10−4 massive planets ((cid:46) 0.5 MSaturn) do not produce a gap that is suf- ficiently wide, while more massive planets ((cid:38) 1.0 MSaturn) pre- vent the transport of dust inwards entirely, forming a transition disk (inner hole in large grains). Our radiative transfer calcula- tions (Sect 4) show that surface density of the mm grains beyond the planet orbit is enhanced and largely confined in a narrow ring. This may be the signature of dust pile-up due to the planet- induced gas pressure maximum beyond the orbit of the planet. Interestingly, the ALMA C18O image presented in Huang et al. (2016) shows an extended emission peaking at nearly 130 au. This extended emission is co-spatial to the outer dust ring. This is a strong indication that the large scale C18O emission follows the actual disk surface density in the outer disk and it points to a gas density drop by a factor of a few inside the outer gap ('G2'). We have also investigated the existence of a second planet in correspondence of the inner dust gap. We conclude that there could be a second planet present in the inner gap if it is less than about 0.1 MJ. Since the two gaps are close to the 2:1 resonance this raises the possibility that the structure could be caused by a pair of planets migrating in resonance. The 1 mm surface density resulting from a pair of 0.05 MJ - 0.2 MJ is in remarkable agree- ment with the observations. Nonetheless, while both scenarios require low disk turbulence, the presence of the inner planet is not needed to explain the observed structures. The inferred presence of the Saturn-like planet at r ∼ 95 au raises new questions about planet formation at such large dis- tance from the star. Gravitational instability can occur on short timescales and is a viable process for the formation of giant plan- ets on wide orbits (e.g, Kratter & Lodato 2016). An alternative scenario is pebble accretion, in which planets grow through the accretion of cm-sized (or larger) grains that are weakly coupled to the gas (Lambrechts & Johansen 2012). In this case however planet formation is challenged by dust migration: according to dust evolution models such large dust grains are expected to drift towards the star in much less than a Myr (e.g., Takeuchi et al. 2005; Brauer et al. 2008), which is difficult to reconcile with disk lifetimes (a few Myr, e.g., Fedele et al. 2010). In the case of AS 209, the dust inward migration is likely to be slowed down by the presence of radial dust traps induced by the presence of a Saturn-like planet. While this can help to reconcile the presence of large dust with the disk's lifetime, it must hinder pebble accretion in the inner disk, restricting this mode of planet formation to the earliest phases of disk evolution, on timescales (cid:46) 1 Myr. Acknowledgements. This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#2015.1.00486.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (represent- ing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), NSC and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in coop- eration with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. DF acknowledges support from the Italian Min- istry of Education, Universities and Research, project SIR (RBSI14ZRHR). MT has been supported by the DISCSIM project, grant agreement 341137 funded by the European Research Council under ERC-2013-ADG. References ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C. L., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, L3 Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Espaillat, C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 732, 42 Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., Qi, C., & Dullemond, C. P. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1502 Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Zhu, Z., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, L40 Bae, J., Zhu, Z., & Hartmann, L. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1706.03066] Benítez-Llambay, P. & Masset, F. S. 2016, ApJS, 223, 11 Birnstiel, T., Klahr, H., & Ercolano, B. 2012, A&A, 539, A148 Brauer, F., Dullemond, C. P., & Henning, T. 2008, A&A, 480, 859 Bruderer, S. 2013, A&A, 559, A46 Bruderer, S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Doty, S. D., & Herczeg, G. J. 2012, A&A, 541, Crida, A., Morbidelli, A., & Masset, F. 2006, Icarus, 181, 587 D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Franco-Hernández, R., & Servín, H. 2006, ApJ, 638, 314 Dong, R., Li, S., Chiang, E., & Li, H. 2017, ApJ, 843, 127 Ercolano, B., Rosotti, G. P., Picogna, G., & Testi, L. 2017, MNRAS, 464, L95 Fedele, D., Carney, M., Hogerheijde, M. R., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A72 Fedele, D., van den Ancker, M. E., Henning, T., Jayawardhana, R., & Oliveira, J. M. 2010, A&A, 510, A72 Flock, M., Ruge, J. P., Dzyurkevich, N., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A68 Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, A91 306 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A2 Goodman, J. & Weare, J. 2010, Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, p. 65-80, 2010, 5, 65 Huang, J., Öberg, K. I., & Andrews, S. M. 2016, ApJ, 823, L18 Huang, J., Öberg, K. I., Qi, C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 231 Isella, A., Guidi, G., Testi, L., et al. 2016, Physical Review Letters, 117, 251101 Kratter, K. & Lodato, G. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 271 Lambrechts, M. & Johansen, A. 2012, A&A, 544, A32 Loomis, R. A., Öberg, K. I., Andrews, S. M., & MacGregor, M. A. 2017, ApJ, Natta, A., Testi, L., & Randich, S. 2006, A&A, 452, 245 Okuzumi, S., Momose, M., Sirono, S.-i., Kobayashi, H., & Tanaka, H. 2016, Papaloizou, J. & Lin, D. N. C. 1984, ApJ, 285, 818 Pérez, L. M., Carpenter, J. M., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, L17 Pinilla, P., Birnstiel, T., Ricci, L., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, A114 Rosotti, G. P., Juhasz, A., Booth, R. A., & Clarke, C. J. 2016, MNRAS, 459, Takeuchi, T., Clarke, C. J., & Lin, D. N. C. 2005, ApJ, 627, 286 Tazzari, M., Beaujean, F., & Testi, L. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1709.06999] Tazzari, M., Testi, L., Ercolano, B., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A53 Zhang, K., Blake, G. A., & Bergin, E. A. 2015, ApJ, 806, L7 Zhu, Z., Stone, J. M., & Rafikov, R. R. 2013, ApJ, 768, 143 840, 23 ApJ, 821, 82 2790 Article number, page 7 of 9 A&A proofs: manuscript no. as209 Fig. A.1. Results of multi-components geometrical fit with MCMC: comparison of the observed (gray dots) and bestfit model (red line) de- projected visibilities. Appendix A: MCMC Article number, page 8 of 9 D. Fedele et al.: ALMA continuum observations of the protoplanetary disk AS 209 Fig. A.2. 1D and 2D marginalized distributions of the posterior sampling obtained from MCMC. In the 1D marginalized distributions of each parameter the vertical dashed lines represent the 16th, 50th and 84th percentiles: the median is taken as the bestfit value, and half the interval between 16th and 84th percentiles as the uncertainty. Article number, page 9 of 9 I077.580.082.5RcRc0.260.240.22φ1φ12.12.22.3φ2φ261.662.0RG1RG17.68.08.4hwG1hwG10.020.030.04δG1δG10.7750.800δR1δR1102.8103.2103.6RG2RG215.215.616.0hwG2hwG20.020.03δG2δG24.44.8δR2δR2139.6140.0RR2,outRR2,out7.27.6I01.501.752.00δout77.580.082.5Rc0.260.240.22φ12.12.22.3φ261.662.0RG17.68.08.4hwG10.020.030.04δG10.7750.800δR1102.8103.2103.6RG215.215.616.0hwG20.020.03δG24.44.8δR2139.6140.0RR2,out1.501.752.00δoutδout
1901.01643	2	1901	2019-04-05T02:33:20	A Hot Saturn Orbiting An Oscillating Late Subgiant Discovered by TESS	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	We present the discovery of TOI-197.01, the first transiting planet identified by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) for which asteroseismology of the host star is possible. TOI-197 (HIP116158) is a bright (V=8.2 mag), spectroscopically classified subgiant which oscillates with an average frequency of about 430 muHz and displays a clear signature of mixed modes. The oscillation amplitude confirms that the redder TESS bandpass compared to Kepler has a small effect on the oscillations, supporting the expected yield of thousands of solar-like oscillators with TESS 2-minute cadence observations. Asteroseismic modeling yields a robust determination of the host star radius (2.943+/-0.064 Rsun), mass (1.212 +/- 0.074 Msun) and age (4.9+/-1.1 Gyr), and demonstrates that it has just started ascending the red-giant branch. Combining asteroseismology with transit modeling and radial-velocity observations, we show that the planet is a "hot Saturn" (9.17+/-0.33 Rearth) with an orbital period of ~14.3 days, irradiance of 343+/-24 Fearth, moderate mass (60.5 +/- 5.7 Mearth) and density (0.431+/-0.062 gcc). The properties of TOI-197.01 show that the host-star metallicity - planet mass correlation found in sub-Saturns (4-8 Rearth) does not extend to larger radii, indicating that planets in the transition between sub-Saturns and Jupiters follow a relatively narrow range of densities. With a density measured to ~15%, TOI-197.01 is one of the best characterized Saturn-sized planets to date, augmenting the small number of known transiting planets around evolved stars and demonstrating the power of TESS to characterize exoplanets and their host stars using asteroseismology.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version April 8, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 9 1 0 2 r p A 5 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 3 4 6 1 0 . 1 0 9 1 : v i X r a A HOT SATURN ORBITING AN OSCILLATING LATE SUBGIANT DISCOVERED BY TESS Daniel Huber,1 William J. Chaplin,2, 3 Ashley Chontos,1, 4 Hans Kjeldsen,3, 5 Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard,3 Timothy R. Bedding,6, 3 Warrick Ball,2, 3 Rafael Brahm,7, 8, 9 Nestor Espinoza,10 Thomas Henning,10 Andr´es Jord´an,8, 9 Paula Sarkis,10 Emil Knudstrup,3 Simon Albrecht,3 Frank Grundahl,3, 5 Mads Fredslund Andersen,3 Pere L. Pall´e,11, 12 Ian Crossfield,13 Benjamin Fulton,14 Andrew W. Howard,15 Howard T. Isaacson,16 Lauren M. Weiss,1 Rasmus Handberg,3 Mikkel N. Lund,3 Aldo M. Serenelli,17, 18 Jakob Rørsted Mosumgaard,3 Amalie Stokholm,3 Allyson Bieryla,19 Lars A. Buchhave,20 David W. Latham,19 Samuel N. Quinn,19 Eric Gaidos,21 Teruyuki Hirano,22, 1 George R. Ricker,13 Roland K. Vanderspek,13 Sara Seager,13, 23, 24 Jon M. Jenkins,25 Joshua N. Winn,26 H. M. Antia,27 Thierry Appourchaux,28 Sarbani Basu,29 Keaton J. Bell,30, 3 Othman Benomar,31 Alfio Bonanno,32 Derek L. Buzasi,33 Tiago L. Campante,34, 35 Z. C¸ elik Orhan,36 Enrico Corsaro,32 Margarida S. Cunha,34 Guy R. Davies,2, 3 Sebastien Deheuvels,37 Samuel K. Grunblatt,1 Amir Hasanzadeh,38 Maria Pia Di Mauro,39 Rafael A. Garc´ıa,40, 41 Patrick Gaulme,30, 3 L´eo Girardi,42 Joyce A. Guzik,43 Marc Hon,44 Chen Jiang,45 Thomas Kallinger,46 Steven D. Kawaler,47 James S. Kuszlewicz,30, 3 Yveline Lebreton,48, 49 Tanda Li,6, 3 Miles Lucas,47 Mia S. Lundkvist,3, 50 Andrew W. Mann,51 St´ephane Mathis,40, 41 Savita Mathur,11, 12 Anwesh Mazumdar,52 Travis S. Metcalfe,53, 54 Andrea Miglio,2, 3 M´ario J. P. F. G. Monteiro,34, 35 Benoit Mosser,48 Anthony Noll,37 Benard Nsamba,34, 35 Jia Mian Joel Ong,29 S. Ortel,36 Filipe Pereira,34, 35 Pritesh Ranadive,52 Clara R´egulo,11, 12 Tha´ıse S. Rodrigues,42 Ian W. Roxburgh,55 Victor Silva Aguirre,3 Barry Smalley,56 Mathew Schofield,2, 3 S´ergio G. Sousa,34 Keivan G. Stassun,57, 58 Dennis Stello,44, 6, 3 Jamie Tayar,1, 59 Timothy R. White,60 Kuldeep Verma,3 Mathieu Vrard,34 M. Yıldız,36 David Baker,61 Michael Bazot,31 Charles Beichmann,62 Christoph Bergmann,63 Lisa Bugnet,40, 41 Bryson Cale,64 Roberto Carlino,65 Scott M. Cartwright,66 Jessie L. Christiansen,62 David R. Ciardi,62 Orlagh Creevey,67 Jason A. Dittmann,19 Jose-Dias Do Nascimento Jr.,19, 68 Vincent Van Eylen,26 Gabor Fur´esz,13 Jonathan Gagn´e,69 Peter Gao,16 Kosmas Gazeas,70 Frank Giddens,71 Oliver J. Hall,2, 3 Saskia Hekker,30, 3 Michael J. Ireland,60 Natasha Latouf,64 Danny LeBrun,64 Alan M. Levine,13 William Matzko,64 Eva Natinsky,61 Emma Page,61 Peter Plavchan,64 Masoud Mansouri-Samani,65 Sean McCauliff,72 Susan E. Mullally,73 Brendan Orenstein,60 Aylin Garcia Soto,23 Martin Paegert,19 Jennifer L. van Saders,1 Chloe Schnaible,61 David R. Soderblom,73 R´obert Szab´o,74, 75 Angelle Tanner,76 C. G. Tinney,63 Johanna Teske,69, 77, 59 Alexandra Thomas,2, 3 Regner Trampedach,53, 3 Duncan Wright,78 Thomas T. Yuan,61 and Farzaneh Zohrabi76 1Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai'i, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 2School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK 3Stellar Astrophysics Centre (SAC), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 4NSF Graduate Research Fellow 5Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Vilnius University, Sauletekio av. 3, 10257 Vilnius, Lithuania 6Sydney Institute for Astronomy (SIfA), School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 7Center of Astro-Engineering UC, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Av. Vicuna Mackenna 4860, 7820436 Macul, Santiago, Chile 8Instituto de Astrof´ısica, Facultad de F´ısica, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile 9Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Av. Vicuna Mackenna 4860, 782-0436 Macul, Santiago, Chile 10Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie, Konigstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany 11Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias (IAC), 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 12Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), Departamento de Astrof´ısica, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 13Department of Physics, and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 14NASA Exoplanet Science Institute / Caltech-IPAC, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 15California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 16Department of Astronomy, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 17Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC) Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193, Barcelona, Spain 18Institut dEstudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), C/Gran Capita, 2-4, E-08034, Barcelona, Spain 19Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 20DTU Space, National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 328, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [email protected] 2 Huber et al. 21Department of Earth Sciences, University of Hawaii at M¯anoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA 22Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan 23Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 24Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, 25NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035 USA 26Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, 4 Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA 27Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India 28Univ. Paris-Sud, Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale, UMR 8617, CNRS, Batiment 121, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France 29Department of Astronomy, Yale University, P.O. Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520-8101, USA 30Max-Planck-Institut fur Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077 Gottingen, Germany 31Center for Space Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, UAE 32INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, via S. Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy 33Dept. of Chemistry & Physics, Florida Gulf Coast University, 10501 FGCU Blvd. S., Fort Myers, FL 33965 USA 34Instituto de Astrof´ısica e Ciencias do Espa¸co, Universidade do Porto, CAUP, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal 35Departamento de F´ısica e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciencias da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, PT4169-007 36Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, Science Faculty, Ege University, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey Porto, Portugal 37IRAP, Universit´e de Toulouse, CNRS, CNES, UPS, Toulouse, France 38Department of Physics, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran 39INAF-IAPS, Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, I-00133 Roma, Italy 40IRFU, CEA, Universit´e Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 41AIM, CEA, CNRS, Universit´e Paris-Saclay, Universit´e Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cit´e, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 42Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova -- INAF, Vicolo dellOsservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy 43Los Alamos National Laboratory, XTD-NTA, MS T-082, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA 44School of Physics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia 45School of Physics and Astronomy, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China 46Institute of Astrophysics, University of Vienna, 1180 Vienna, Austria 47Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 USA 48LESIA, CNRS, Universit´e Pierre et Marie Curie, Universit´e Denis, Diderot, Observatoire de Paris, 92195 Meudon cedex, France 49Univ Rennes, CNRS, IPR (Institut de Physique de Rennes) - UMR 6251, F-35000 Rennes, France 50Zentrum fur Astronomie der Universitat Heidelberg, Landessternwarte, Konigstuhl 12, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany 51Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA 52Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education, TIFR, V. N. Purav Marg, Mankhurd, Mumbai 400088, India 53Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Suite 205, Boulder CO 80301, USA 54Max-Planck-Institut fur Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077, Gottingen, Germany 55Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK 56Astrophysics Group, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, United Kingdom 57Vanderbilt University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, 6301 Stevenson Center Ln., Nashville, TN 37235, USA 58Vanderbilt Initiative in Data-intensive Astrophysics (VIDA), 6301 Stevenson Center Lane, Nashville, TN 37235, USA 59Hubble Fellow 60Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia 61Physics Department, Austin College, Sherman, TX 75090, USA 62Caltech/IPAC-NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 63Exoplanetary Science at UNSW, School of Physics, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia 64Department of Physics and Astronomy, George Mason University 4400 University Ave, Fairfax, VA 22030 65SGT Inc/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035 66Proto-Logic Consulting LLC, Washington, DC 20009, USA 67Universit´e Cote d'Azur, Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, France 68Univ. Federal do Rio G. do Norte, UFRN, Dep. de Fsica, CP 1641, 59072-970, Natal, RN, Brazil 69Carnegie Institution of Washington DTM, 5241 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, DC 20015, USA 70Section of Astrophysics, Astronomy and Mechanics, Faculty of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, GR-15784 Zografos, Athens, Greece 71Missouri State University 72LinkedIn work performed at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035 73Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21212 TOI-197 3 74MTA CSFK, Konkoly Observatory, Budapest, Konkoly Thege Mikl´os ´ut 15-17, H-1121, Hungary 75MTA CSFK Lendulet Near-Field Cosmology Research Group 76Mississippi State University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Hilbun Hall, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA 77Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101 78University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia ABSTRACT We present the discovery of TOI-197.01, the first transiting planet identified by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS ) for which asteroseismology of the host star is possible. TOI- 197 (HIP 116158) is a bright (V = 8.2 mag), spectroscopically classified subgiant which oscillates with an average frequency of about 430 µHz and displays a clear signature of mixed modes. The oscillation amplitude confirms that the redder TESS bandpass compared to Kepler has a small effect on the oscillations, supporting the expected yield of thousands of solar-like oscillators with TESS 2-minute cadence observations. Asteroseismic modeling yields a robust determination of the host star radius (R(cid:63) = 2.943 ± 0.064R(cid:12)), mass (M(cid:63) = 1.212 ± 0.074M(cid:12)) and age (4.9 ± 1.1 Gyr), and demonstrates that it has just started ascending the red-giant branch. Combining asteroseismology with transit modeling and radial-velocity observations, we show that the planet is a "hot Saturn" (Rp = 9.17 ± 0.33R⊕) with an orbital period of ∼ 14.3 days, irradiance of F = 343 ± 24F⊕, moderate mass (Mp = 60.5 ± 5.7M⊕) and density (ρp = 0.431 ± 0.062 g cm−3). The properties of TOI-197.01 show that the host-star metallicity -- planet mass correlation found in sub-Saturns (4 − 8R⊕) does not extend to larger radii, indicating that planets in the transition between sub-Saturns and Jupiters follow a relatively narrow range of densities. With a density measured to ∼ 15%, TOI-197.01 is one of the best characterized Saturn-sized planets to date, augmenting the small number of known transiting planets around evolved stars and demonstrating the power of TESS to characterize exoplanets and their host stars using asteroseismology. Keywords: planets and satellites: individual (TOI-197) -- stars: fundamental parameters -- tech- niques: asteroseismology, photometry, spectroscopy -- TESS -- planetary systems 1. INTRODUCTION Asteroseismology is one of the major success stories of the space photometry revolution initiated by CoRoT (Baglin et al. 2006) and Kepler (Borucki et al. 2010). The detection of oscillations in thousands of stars has led to breakthroughs such as the discovery of rapidly rotating cores in subgiants and red giants, as well as the systematic measurement of stellar masses, radii and ages (see Chaplin & Miglio 2013, for a review). As- teroseismology has also become the "gold standard" for calibrating more indirect methods to determine stellar parameters such as surface gravity (log g) from spec- troscopy (Petigura et al. 2017a) and stellar granulation (Mathur et al. 2011; Bastien et al. 2013; Kallinger et al. 2016; Corsaro et al. 2017; Bugnet et al. 2018; Pande et al. 2018), and age from rotation periods (gyrochronology, e.g. Garc´ıa et al. 2014; van Saders et al. 2016). A remarkable synergy that emerged from space-based photometry is the systematic characterization of exo- planet host stars using asteroseismology. Following first asteroseismic studies of exoplanet host stars using ra- dial velocities (Bouchy et al. 2005; Bazot et al. 2005), the Hubble Space Telescope (Gilliland et al. 2011) and CoRoT (Ballot et al. 2011b; Lebreton & Goupil 2014), Kepler enabled the systematic characterization of exo- planets with over 100 detections of oscillations in host stars to date (Huber et al. 2013a; Lundkvist et al. 2016). In addition to the more precise characterization of exo- planet radii and masses (Ballard et al. 2014), the synergy also enabled systematic constraints on stellar spin-orbit alignments (Chaplin et al. 2014b; Benomar et al. 2014; Lund et al. 2014; Campante et al. 2016a) and statistical inferences on orbital eccentricities through constraints on the mean stellar density (Sliski & Kipping 2014; Van Eylen & Albrecht 2015; Van Eylen et al. 2019). The recently launched NASA TESS Mission (Ricker et al. 2014) is poised to continue the synergy between as- teroseismology and exoplanet science. Using dedicated 2-minute cadence observations, TESS is expected to de- tect oscillations in thousands of main-sequence, sub- giant and early red-giant stars (Schofield et al. 2018), and simulations predict that at least 100 of these will host transiting or non-transiting exoplanets (Campante et al. 2016b). TESS host stars are on average signif- icantly brighter than typical Kepler hosts, facilitating ground-based measurements of planet masses with pre- 4 Huber et al. cisely characterized exoplanet hosts from asteroseismol- ogy. While some of the first exoplanets discovered with TESS orbit stars that have evolved off the main se- quence (Wang et al. 2019; Brahm et al. 2018; Nielsen et al. 2019), none of them were amenable to asteroseis- mology using TESS photometry. Here, we present the characterization of TESS Object of Interest 197 (TOI- 197, HIP 116158) system, the first discovery by TESS of a transiting exoplanet around a host star in which oscillations can be measured. 2. OBSERVATIONS 2.1. TESS Photometry TESS observed TOI-197 in 2-minute cadence during Sector 2 of Cycle 1 for 27 days. We used the target pixel files produced by the TESS Science Processing Operations Center (Jenkins et al. 2016) as part of the TESS alerts on November 11 20181. We produced a light curve using the photometry pipeline2 (Handberg et al., in prep.) maintained by the TESS Asteroseismic Science Operations Center (TASOC, Lund et al. 2017), which is based on software originally developed to gen- erate light curves for data collected by the K2 Mission (Lund et al. 2015). Figure 1a shows the raw light curve obtained from the TASOC pipeline. The coverage is nearly continu- ous (duty cycle ∼ 93%), with a ∼ 2 day gap separating the two spacecraft orbits in the observing sector. Two ∼ 0.1 % brightness dips, which triggered the identifica- tion of TOI-197.01 as a planet candidate, are evident near the beginning of each TESS orbit (see upward tri- angles in Figure 1a). The structure with a period of ∼ 2.5 d corresponds to instrumental variations due to the angular momentum dumping cycle of the spacecraft. To prepare the raw light curve for an asteroseismic analysis, the current TASOC pipeline implements a se- ries of corrections as described by Handberg & Lund (2014), which includes removal of instrumental arte- facts and of the transit events using a combination of filters utilizing the estimated planetary period. Future TASOC-prepared light curves from full TESS data re- leases will use information from the ensemble of stars to remove common instrumental systematics (Lund et al, in prep.). Alternative light curve corrections using tran- sit removal and gap interpolation (Garc´ıa et al. 2011; Pires et al. 2015) yielded consistent results. The cor- rected TASOC light curve is shown in Figure 1b. Figure 1c shows a power spectrum of this light curve, revealing 1 https://doi.org/10.17909/t9-wx1n-aw08 2 https://tasoc.dk/code/ the clear presence of a granulation background and a power excess from solar-like oscillations near ∼ 430 µHz, both characteristic of an evolved star near the base of the red-giant branch. 2.2. High-Resolution Spectroscopy We obtained high-resolution spectra of TOI-197 us- ing several facilities within the TESS Follow-up Obser- vation Program (TFOP), including HIRES (Vogt et al. 1994) on the 10-m telescope at Keck Observatory (Mau- nakea, Hawai'i), the Hertzsprung SONG Telescope at Teide Observatory (Tenerife) (Grundahl et al. 2017), HARPS (Mayor et al. 2003), FEROS (Kaufer et al. 1999), Coralie (Queloz et al. 2001) and FIDEOS (Vanzi et al. 2018) on the MPG/ESO 3.6-m, 2.2-m, 1.2-m, and 1-m telescopes at La Silla Observatory (Chile), Veloce (Gilbert et al. 2018) on the 3.9-m Anglo-Australian Tele- scope at Siding Spring Observatory (Australia), TRES (Fur´esz 2008) on the 1.5-m Tillinghast reflector at the F. L. Whipple Observatory (Mt. Hopkins, Arizona), and iSHELL (Rayner et al. 2012) on the NASA IRTF Telescope (Maunakea, Hawaii). All spectra used in this paper were obtained between Nov 11 and Dec 30 2018 and have a minimum spectral resolution of R ≈ 44000. FEROS, Coralie, and HARPS data were processed and analyzed with the CERES package (Brahm et al. 2017a), which performs the optimal extraction and wavelength calibration of each spectrum, along with the measure- ment of precision radial velocities and bisector spans via the cross-correlation technique. Most instruments have been previously used to obtain precise radial velocities to confirm exoplanets, and we refer to the publications listed above for details on the reduction methods. To obtain stellar parameters, we analyzed a HIRES spectrum using Specmatch (Petigura 2015), which has been extensively applied for the classification of Kepler exoplanet host stars (Johnson et al. 2017; Petigura et al. 2017a). The resulting parameters were Teff = 5080 ± 70 K, log g = 3.60 ± 0.08 dex, [Fe/H] = −0.08 ± 0.05 dex and v sin i = 2.8±1.6 km s−1, consistent with an evolved star as identified from the power spectrum in Figure 1c. To account for systematic differences between spectro- scopic methods (Torres et al. 2012) we added 59 K in Teff and 0.062 dex in [Fe/H] in quadrature to the formal un- certainties, yielding final values of Teff = 5080±90 K and [Fe/H] = −0.08 ± 0.08 dex. Independent spectroscopic analyses yielded consistent results, including an analy- sis of a HIRES spectrum using ARES+MOOG (Sousa 2014; Sousa et al. 2018), FEROS spectra using ZASPE (Brahm et al. 2017b), TRES spectra using SPC (Buch- have et al. 2012) and iSHELL spectra using BT-Settl models (Allard et al. 2012). TOI-197 5 Figure 1. Panel (a): Raw TESS 2-minute cadence light curve of TOI-197 produced by the TESS Asteroseismic Science Operations Center (TASOC). The red line is the light curve smoothed with a 10-minute boxcar filter (shown for illustration purposes only). Upward triangles mark the two transit events. Panel (b): Light curve after applying corrections by the TASOC pipeline. Panel (c): Power spectrum of panel (b), showing a granulation background and power excess due to oscillations near ∼ 430 µHz. The solid red line is a global fit, consisting of granulation plus white noise and a Gaussian describing the power excess due to oscillations. Dashed red lines show the two granulation components and the white noise level, respectively. 2.3. Broadband Photometry & Gaia Parallax We fitted the spectral energy distribution (SED) of TOI-197 using broadband photometry following the method described by Stassun & Torres (2016). We used NUV photometry from GALEX, BT VT from Tycho-2 (Høg et al. 2000), BV gri from APASS, JHKS from 2MASS (Skrutskie et al. 2006), W1 -- W4 from WISE (Wright et al. 2010), and the G magnitude from Gaia (Evans et al. 2018). The data were fit using Kurucz atmosphere models, with Teff , [Fe/H] and extinc- tion (AV ) as free parameters. We restricted AV to the maximum line-of-sight value from the dust maps of Schlegel et al. (1998). The resulting fit yielded Teff = 5090 ± 85 K, [Fe/H] = −0.3 ± 0.3 dex, and AV = 0.09 ± 0.02 mag with reduced χ2 of 1.9, in good agreement with spectroscopy. Integrating the (de- reddened) model SED gives the bolometric flux at Earth of Fbol = 1.88±0.04×10−8 erg s cm−2. An independent SED fit using 2MASS, APASS9, USNO-B1 and WISE photometry and Kurucz models yielded excellent agree- ment, with Fbol = 1.83 ± 0.09 × 10−8 erg s cm−2 and Teff = 5150 ± 130 K. Additional independent analyses 135513601365137013751380BJD-2457000 (days)200002000Flux (ppm)(a)135513601365137013751380BJD-2457000 (days)20001000010002000Flux (ppm)(b)102103Frequency (Hz)101102103Power Density (ppm2 Hz1)(c)6 Huber et al. using the method by Mann et al. (2016) and PARAM (Rodrigues et al. 2014, 2017) yielded bolometric fluxes and extinction values that are consistent within 1 σ with the values quoted above. Combining the bolometric flux with the Gaia DR2 distance allows us to derive a nearly model-independent luminosity, which is a valuable constraint for asteroseis- mic modeling (see Section 3.3). Using a Gaia parallax of 10.518 ± 0.080 mas (adjusted for the 0.082 ± 0.033 mas zero-point offset for nearby stars reported by Stassun & Torres 2018) with the two methods described above yielded L(cid:63) = 5.30 ± 0.14L(cid:12) (using Fbol = 1.88 ± 0.04 × 10−8 erg s cm−2) and L(cid:63) = 5.13 ± 0.13L(cid:12) (using Fbol = 1.83 ± 0.09 × 10−8 erg s cm−2). We also derived a luminosity using isoclassify (Huber et al. 2017)3, adopting 2MASS K-band photometry, bolometric cor- rections from MIST isochrones (Choi et al. 2016) and the composite reddening map mwdust (Bovy et al. 2016), yielding L(cid:63) = 5.03 ± 0.13L(cid:12). Our adopted luminosity was the mean of these methods with an uncertainty cal- culated by adding the mean uncertainty and scatter over all methods in quadrature, yielding L(cid:63) = 5.15± 0.17L(cid:12). 2.4. High-Resolution Imaging TOI-197 was observed with the NIRC2 camera and Altair adaptive optics system on Keck-2 (Wizinowich et al. 2000) on UT 25 November 2018. Conditions were clear but seeing was poor (0.8 -- 2"). We used the science target as the natural guide star and images were ob- tained through a K-continuum plus KP501.5 filter using the narrow camera (10 mas pixel scale). We obtained eight images (four each at two dither positions), each consisting of 50 co-adds of 0.2 sec each, with correlated double-sampling mode and four reads. Frames were co- added and we subtracted an average dark image, con- structed from a set of darks with the same integration time and sampling mode. Flat-fielding was performed using a dome flat obtained in the K(cid:48) filter. "Hot" pixels were identified in the dark image and corrected by me- dian filtering with a 5 × 5 box centered on each affected pixel in the science image. Only a single star appears in the images. We performed tests in which "clones" of the stellar image reduced by a specified contrast ratio were added to the original image. These show that we would have been able to detect companions as faint as ∆K = 5.8 mag within 0.4" of TOI-197, 3.8 mag within 0.2", and 1.8 mag within 0.1". Additional NIRC2 observations were obtained in the narrow-band Br−γ filter (λo = 2.1686; ∆λ = 0.0326µm) on UT 22 November 2018. A standard 3-point dither pattern with a step size of 3(cid:48)(cid:48) was repeated twice with each dither offset from the previous dither by 0.5(cid:48)(cid:48). An integration time of 0.25 seconds was used with one coadd per frame for a total of 2.25 seconds on target, and the camera was used in the narrow-angle mode. No addi- tional stellar companions were detected to within a res- olution of ∼ 0.05(cid:48)(cid:48) FWHM. The sensitivities of the final combined AO image were determined following Ciardi et al. (2015) and Furlan et al. (2017), with detection lim- its as faint as ∆Br − γ = 7.4 mag within 0.4", 6.1 mag within 0.2", and 3.2 mag within 0.1". The results from NIRC2 are consistent with Speckle observations using HRCam (Tokovinin et al. 2010) on the 4.1 m SOAR telescope4. Since the companion is un- likely to be bluer than TOI-197, these constraints ex- clude any significant dilution (both for oscillation am- plitudes and the depth of transit events). 3. ASTEROSEISMOLOGY 3.1. Global Oscillation Parameters To extract oscillation parameters characterizing the average properties of the power spectrum, we used sev- eral automated analysis methods (e.g. Huber et al. 2009; Mathur et al. 2010; Mosser et al. 2012a; Benomar et al. 2012; Kallinger et al. 2012; Corsaro & De Ridder 2014; Lundkvist 2015; Stello et al. 2017; Campante 2018; Bell et al. 2019), many of which have been extensively tested on Kepler data (e.g. Hekker et al. 2011; Verner et al. 2011). In most of these analyses, the power contribu- tions due to granulation noise and stellar activity were modeled by a combination of power laws and a flat con- tribution due to shot noise, and then corrected by di- viding the power spectrum by the background model. The individual contributions and background model us- ing the method by Huber et al. (2009) are shown as dashed and solid red lines in Fig. 1c, and a close-up of the power excess is shown in Fig. 2a. Next, the frequency of maximum power (νmax) was measured either by heavily smoothing the power spec- trum or by fitting a Gaussian function to the power excess. Our analysis yielded νmax = 430 ± 18 µHz, with uncertainties calculated from the scatter between all fitting techniques. Finally, the mean oscillation amplitude per radial mode was determined by taking the peak of the smoothed, background-corrected os- cillation envelope and correcting for the contribution of non-radial modes (Kjeldsen et al. 2008b), yielding A = 18.7 ± 3.5 ppm. We caution that the νmax and 3 https://github.com/danxhuber/isoclassify 4 441462736 https://exofop.ipac.caltech.edu/tess/target.php?id= TOI-197 7 Figure 2. Panel (a): Power spectrum of TOI-197 cen- tered on the frequency region showing oscillations. Vertical dashed lines mark identified individual frequencies. Panel (b): Greyscale ´echelle diagram5 of the background-corrected and smoothed power spectrum in panel (a). Identified indi- vidual mode frequencies are marked with blue circles (l = 0, radial modes), green squares (l = 2, quadrupole modes) and red diamonds (l = 1, dipole modes). Note that the diagram is replicated for clarity (Bedding 2012). amplitude estimates could be significantly biased by the stochastic nature of the oscillations. The modes are not well resolved, as demonstrated by the non-Gaussian ap- pearance of the power spectrum and the particularly strong peak at 420 µHz. Global seismic parameters such as νmax and ampli- tude follow well-known scaling relations (Huber et al. 2011; Mosser et al. 2012b; Corsaro et al. 2013), which allow us to test whether the detected oscillations are consistent with expectations. Figure 3 compares our measured νmax and amplitude with results for ∼1500 stars observed by Kepler (Huber et al. 2011). We ob- serve excellent agreement, confirming that the detected 5 ´Echelle diagrams are constructed by dividing a power spec- trum into equal segments with length ∆ν and stacking one above the other, so that modes with a given spherical degree align verti- cally in ridges (Grec et al. 1983). Departures from regularity arise from sound speed discontinuities and from mixed modes, and thus probe the interior structure of a star. Figure 3. Amplitude per radial mode versus frequency of maximum power for a sample of ∼ 1500 stars spanning from the main-sequence to the red giant branch observed by Kepler (Huber et al. 2011). The red star shows the measured position of TOI-197. The uncertainties are approximately equal to the symbol size. signal is consistent with solar-like oscillations. We note that the oscillations in the TESS bandpass are expected to be ∼ 15 % smaller than in the bluer Kepler band- pass, which is well within the spread of amplitudes at a given νmax observed in the Kepler sample. The result confirms that the redder bandpass of TESS only has a small effect on the oscillation amplitude, supporting the expected rich yield of solar-like oscillators with TESS 2-minute cadence observations (Schofield et al. 2018). 3.2. Individual Mode Frequencies The power spectrum in Fig. 2a shows several clear peaks corresponding to individual oscillation modes. Given that TESS instrument artifacts are not yet well understood, we restricted our analysis to the frequency range 400 -- 500 µHz where we observe peaks well above the background level. To extract these individual mode frequencies, we independent methods ranging from tra- used several i.e., pre-whitening ditional iterative sine-wave fitting, (e.g. Lenz & Breger 2005; Kjeldsen et al. 2005; Bed- ding et al. 2007), to fitting of Lorentzian mode profiles (e.g. Handberg & Campante 2011; Appourchaux et al. 2012; Mosser et al. 2012b; Corsaro & De Ridder 2014; Corsaro et al. 2015; Vrard et al. 2015; Davies & Miglio 2016; Roxburgh 2017; Handberg et al. 2017; Kallinger et al. 2018), including publicly available code such as DIAMONDS6. We required at least two independent meth- 6https://github.com/EnricoCorsaro/DIAMONDS 380400420440460480500520Frequency (Hz)05001000150020002500Power Density (ppm2Hz1)(a)0102001020Frequency mod 28.94 Hz380400420440460480500520Frequency (Hz)(b)101102103Frequency of Maximum Power(Hz)101102103Amplitude (ppm)TOI-1978 Huber et al. Table 1. Extracted oscillation frequencies and mode iden- tifications for TOI-197. f (µHz) σf (µHz) 413.12 420.06 429.26 436.77 445.85 448.89 460.16 463.81 477.08 478.07 0.29 0.11 0.14 0.24 0.21 0.21 0.33 0.43 0.31 0.35 l 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 Note: The large frequency separation derived from radial modes is ∆ν = 28.94 ± 0.15µHz. Note that the l = 1 modes at ∼ 460 and ∼ 463 µHz are listed for completeness, but it is unlikely that both of them are genuine (see text). ods to return the same frequency within uncertainties and that the posterior probability of each peak being a mode was ≥ 90 % (Basu & Chaplin 2017). A com- parison of the frequencies returned by different fitters showed very good agreement, at a level smaller than the uncertainties for all the reported modes. For the final list of frequencies we adopted values from one fitter who applied pre-whitening (HK), with uncertainties derived from Monte Carlo simulations of the data, as listed in Table 1. To measure the large frequency separation ∆ν, we per- formed a linear fit to all identified radial modes, yield- ing ∆ν = 28.94 ± 0.15µHz. Figure 2b shows a greyscale ´echelle diagram5 using this ∆ν measurement, including the extracted mode frequencies. The l = 1 modes are strongly affected by mode bumping, as expected for the mixed mode coupling factors for evolved stars in this evolutionary stage. The offset of the l = 0 ridge is ∼ 1.5, consistent with the expected value from Kepler measurements for stars with similar ∆ν and Teff (White et al. 2011). 3.3. Frequency Modeling We used a number of independent approaches to model the observed oscillation frequencies, including different stellar evolution codes (ASTEC, Cesam2K, GARSTEC, Iben, MESA, and YREC, Christensen- Dalsgaard 2008; Morel & Lebreton 2008; Scuflaire et al. 2008; Weiss et al. 2008; Iben 1965; Paxton et al. 2011, 2013, 2015; Choi et al. 2016; Demarque et al. 2008), oscillation codes (ADIPLS, GYRE and Pesnell, Christensen-Dalsgaard 2008; Townsend & Teitler 2013; Pesnell 1990) and modeling methods (including AMP, ´Echelle diagram showing observed oscillation Figure 4. frequencies (filled grey symbols) and a representative best- fitting model (open colored symbols) using GARSTEC, ADIPLS and BeSSP (Serenelli et al. 2017). Model symbol sizes for non-radial modes are scaled using the mode inertia (a proxy for mode amplitude) as described in Cunha et al. (2015). Thick model symbols correspond to modes that were matched to observations. Uncertainties on the observed fre- quencies are than smaller or comparable to the symbol sizes. Note that the l = 1 mode at 460 µHz has been omitted from this plot (see text). ASTFIT, BeSSP, BASTA, PARAM, Creevey et al. 2017; Silva Aguirre et al. 2015; Serenelli et al. 2017; Rodrigues et al. 2014, 2017; Deheuvels & Michel 2011; Yıldız et al. 2016; Ong & Basu 2019; Tayar & Pinsonneault 2018; Le- breton & Goupil 2014; Ball & Gizon 2017; Mosumgaard et al. 2018). Most of the adopted methods applied cor- rections for the surface effect (Kjeldsen et al. 2008a; Ball & Gizon 2017). Model inputs included the spectroscopic temperature and metallicity, individual frequencies, ∆ν, and the luminosity (Section 2.3). To investigate the ef- fects of different input parameters, modelers were asked to provide solutions using both individual frequencies and only using ∆ν, with and without taking into ac- count the luminosity constraint. The constraint on νmax was not used in the modeling since it may be affected by finite mode lifetimes (see Section 3.1). Overall, the modeling efforts yielded consistent re- sults, and most modeling codes were able to provide ad- equate fits to the observed oscillation frequencies. The 0510152025Frequency mod 28.9 Hz300350400450500550Frequency (Hz)l=0l=1l=2TOI-197 9 Table 2. Host Star Parameters Table 3. High-precision Radial Velocities for TOI-197 Basic Properties Time (BJD) RV (m/s) σRV (m/s) Instrument Hipparcos ID TIC ID V Magnitude TESS Magnitude K Magnitude SED & Gaia Parallax Parallax, π (mas) Luminosity, L (L(cid:12)) 116158 441462736 8.15 7.30 6.04 10.518 ± 0.080 5.15 ± 0.17 Spectroscopy Effective Temperature, Teff (K) Metallicity, [Fe/H] (dex) Projected rotation speed, v sin i (km s−1) 5080 ± 90 −0.08 ± 0.08 2.8 ± 1.6 Asteroseismology Stellar Mass, M(cid:63) (M(cid:12)) Stellar Radius, R(cid:63) (R(cid:12)) Stellar Density, ρ(cid:63) (gcc) Surface gravity, log g (cgs) Age, t (Gyr) 1.212 ± 0.074 2.943 ± 0.064 4.9 ± 1.1 0.06702 ± 0.00067 3.584 ± 0.010 Notes: The TESS magnitude is adopted from the TESS Input Catalog (Stassun et al. 2018). modeling confirmed that only one of the two closely- spaced mixed modes near ∼ 460 µHz is likely real, but we have retained both frequencies in Table 1 for consis- tency. An ´echelle diagram with observed frequencies and a representative best-fitting model is shown in Figure 4. Independent analyses confirmed a bimodality splitting into lower-mass, older models (∼ 1.15M(cid:12), ∼ 6 Gyr) and higher-mass, younger models (∼ 1.3M(cid:12), ∼ 4 Gyr). Sur- face rotation would provide an independent mass diag- nostic (e.g. van Saders & Pinsonneault 2013), but the insufficiently constrained v sin i and the unknown stellar inclination mean that we cannot decisively break this degeneracy. Combining an independent constraint of log g = 3.603 ± 0.026 dex from an autocorrelation anal- ysis of the light curve (Kallinger et al. 2016) with a radius from L and Teff favors a higher-mass solution (M(cid:63) = 1.27 ± 0.13M(cid:12)), but may be prone to small sys- tematics in the νmax scaling relation (which was used for the calibration). To make use of the most obser- vational constraints available, we used the set of nine modeling solutions which used Teff , [Fe/H], frequencies and the luminosity as input parameters. From this set of solutions, we adopted the self-consistent set of stellar 2458426.334584 2458426.503655 2458427.575230 2458428.547576 . . . 2458443.535340 2458443.541210 2458443.714865 2458443.825283 . . . 2458482.562290 2458483.541710 2458483.553240 2458483.564690 4.258 6.328 -12.667 17.328 . . . -14.667 -3.067 -6.815 -4.375 . . . 19.433 16.133 19.233 16.233 11.260 11.270 3.000 18.540 . . . 3.600 3.800 0.780 0.720 . . . 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 SONG SONG FEROS SONG . . . CORALIE CORALIE HIRES HIRES . . . HARPS HARPS HARPS HARPS Notes: Error bars do not include contributions from stellar jitter and measurements have not been corrected for zeropoint offsets. This table is available in its entirety in a machine-readable form in the online journal. parameters with the mass closest to the median mass over all results. A more detailed study of the individual modeling results will be presented in a follow-up paper (Li et al., in prep). For ease of propagating stellar parameters to exo- planet modeling (see next section), uncertainties were calculated by adding the median uncertainty for a given stellar parameter in quadrature to the standard devi- ation of the parameter for all methods. This method has been commonly adopted for Kepler (e.g. Chaplin et al. 2014a) and captures both random and system- atic errors estimated from the spread among different methods. For completeness, the individual random and systematic error estimates are R(cid:63) = 2.943±0.041(ran)± 0.049(sys) R(cid:12), M(cid:63) = 1.212±0.052(ran)±0.055(sys) M(cid:12), ρ(cid:63) = 0.06702 ± 0.00019(ran) ± 0.00047(sys) gcc, and t = 4.9 ± 0.6(ran) ± 0.9(sys) Gyr. This demonstrates that systematic errors constitute a significant fraction of the error budget for all stellar properties (in particular stellar age), and emphasize the need for using multiple model grids to derive realistic uncertainties for stars and exoplanets. The final estimates of stellar parameters are summarized in Table 2, constraining the radius, mass, density and age of TOI-197 to ∼ 2 %, ∼ 6 %, ∼ 1 % and ∼ 22 %. 4. PLANET CHARACTERIZATION To fit the transits observed in the TESS data we used the PDC-MAP light curve provided by the TESS Sci- ence Processing and Operations Center (SPOC), which 10 Huber et al. Figure 5. Radial velocity timeseries (panel a) and residuals after subtracting the best-fitting model (panel b) for TOI-197. Datapoints are corrected for zeropoint offsets of individual instruments, and error bars include contributions from stellar jitter. has been optimized to remove instrumental variability and preserve transits (Smith et al. 2012; Stumpe et al. 2014). To optimize computation time we discarded all data more than 2.5 days before and after each of the two observed transits. We have repeated the fit and data preparation procedure using the TASOC light curve and found consistent results. A total of 107 radial velocity measurements from five different instruments (see Section 2.2 and Table 3) were used to constrain the mass of the planet. No spec- troscopic observations were taken during transits, and hence the measurements are unaffected by the Rossiter- McLaughlin effect (∼ 2.3 m s−1 based on the measured v sin i and Rp/R(cid:63)). To remove variations from stellar oscillations, we calculated weighted nightly means for all instruments which obtained multiple observations per night. We performed a joint transit and radial- velocity fit using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm based on the exoplanet modeling code ktransit (Bar- clay 2018), as described in Chontos et al. (2019). We placed a strong Gaussian prior on the mean stellar den- sity using the value derived from asteroseismology (Ta- ble 2) and weak priors on the linear and quadratic limb darkening coefficients, derived from the closest I-band grid points in Claret & Bloemen (2011), with a width of 0.6 for both coefficients. We also adopted a prior for the radial-velocity jitter from granulation and oscillations of 2.5 ± 1.5 m s−1, following Yu et al. (2018) (see also Tayar et al. 2018), and a 1/e prior on the eccentricity to account for the linear bias introduced by sampling in e cos ω and e sin ω (Eastman et al. 2013). Independent zeropoint offsets and stellar jitter values for each of the five instruments that provided radial velocities. Inde- pendent joint fits using EXOFASTv2 (Eastman et al. 2013) yielded consistent results. Figures 5 and 6 show the radial velocity timeseries, phase-folded transit and RV data, and the corresponding best-fitting model. Table 4 lists the summary statistics for all planet and model parameters. The system is well described by a planet in a 14.3 day orbit, which is nearly equal in size but ∼ 35% less massive than Saturn (Rp = 0.836 ± 0.031 RJ, Mp = 0.190 ± 0.018 MJ), with tenta- tive evidence for a mild eccentricity (e = 0.11 ± 0.03). The long transit duration (∼ 0.5 days) is consistent with a non-grazing (b ≈ 0.7) transit given the asteroseismic mean stellar density, providing further confirmation for a gas-giant planet orbiting an evolved star. The radial velocity data do not show evidence for any other short- period companions. Continued monitoring past the ∼4 orbital periods covered here will further reveal details about the orbital architecture of this system. 5. DISCUSSION TOI-197.01 joins an enigmatic but growing class of transiting planets orbiting stars that have significantly evolved off the main sequence. Figure 7 compares the position of TOI-197 within the expected popula- tion of solar-like oscillators to be detected with TESS (panel a) and within the known population of exoplanet host stars. Evolutionary states in Figure 7b have been assigned using solar-metallicity PARSEC evolutionary tracks (Bressan et al. 2012) as described in Berger et al. 143014401450146014701480BJD - 24570001680816Residuals(b)201001020Radial velocity (m s1)(a)FEROSCORALIESONGHIRESHARPSTOI-197 11 Table 4. Planet Parameters Parameter Best-fit Median 84% 16% Model Parameters γHIRES γSONG γFEROS γCORALIE γHARPS σHIRES σSONG σFEROS σCORALIE σHARPS z (ppm) P (days) T0 (BTJD) b Rp/R(cid:63) e cos ω e sin ω K (m/s) ρ(cid:63)(ρ(cid:12)) u1 u2 e ω a (AU) a/R(cid:63) i (o) Rp(R⊕) Rp( RJ) Mp(M⊕) Mp( MJ) ρp (gcc) 4.8 1.1 -15.4 -5.4 8.1 2.71 2.06 3.49 1.88 2.41 199.4 +1.6 +1.5 +1.2 +1.2 +1.5 +0.85 +0.91 +0.75 +0.75 +0.75 +10.6 −1.6 5.4 −1.5 0.2 −1.2 -15.7 −1.2 -5.0 −1.5 8.8 −0.80 2.68 −0.89 2.11 −0.71 3.47 −0.64 2.50 −0.63 2.69 −10.7 199.1 14.2767 +0.0037 −0.0037 14.2762 1357.0135 1357.0149 +0.0025 −0.0026 −0.049 0.728 0.744 0.02854 +0.00084 −0.00071 −0.061 -0.028 −0.030 -0.096 −1.2 14.1 0.06702 +0.00052 −0.00052 0.35 0.44 −0.24 −0.44 0.02846 -0.054 -0.099 14.6 0.06674 +0.36 +0.30 +0.040 +0.063 +0.029 +1.2 0.12 0.71 Derived Properties 0.113 -118.7 0.1233 9.00 85.67 9.16 0.835 63.4 0.200 0.455 0.115 -106.0 0.1228 8.97 85.75 9.17 0.836 60.5 0.190 0.431 −0.030 +0.034 −31.1 +34.7 +0.0025 −0.0026 −0.27 +0.27 −0.35 +0.36 −0.31 +0.34 −0.028 +0.031 −5.7 −0.018 −0.060 +0.018 +0.064 +5.7 Notes: Parameters denote velocity zeropoints γ, radial velocity jitter σ, photometric zero point z, orbital period P , time of transit T0, impact parameter b, star-to-planet radius ratio Rp/R(cid:63), eccentricity e, argument of periastron ω, radial velocity semi-amplitude K, mean stellar density ρ(cid:63), linear and quadratic limb darkening coefficients u1 and u2, semi-major axis a, orbital inclination i, as well as planet radius (Rp), mass (Mp) and density (ρp). Figure 6. TESS light curve (panel a) and radial-velocity measurements (panel b) folded with the best fitting orbital period. Grey points in panel a show the original sampling, and black points are binned means over 10 minutes. Red lines in both pabels show the best-fitting model from the joint fit using stellar parameters, transit and radial velocities. Grey lines show random draws from the joint MCMC model. Error bars in panel b include contributions from stellar jitter. (2018)6 . TOI-197 sits at the boundary between sub- giants and red giants, with the measured ∆ν value indi- cating that the star has just started its ascent on the red-giant branch (Mosser et al. 2014). TOI-197 is a typical target for which we expect to detect solar-like oscillations with TESS, predominantly due to the in- creased oscillation amplitude, which are well known to scale with luminosity (Kjeldsen & Bedding 1995). On the contrary, TOI-197 is rare among known exoplanet hosts: while radial velocity searches have uncovered a large number of planets orbiting red giants on long or- bital periods (e.g. Wittenmyer et al. 2011), less than 15 transiting planets are known around red-giant stars (as defined in Figure 7b). TOI-197 is the sixth example of a transiting planet orbiting a late subgiant / early red giant with detected oscillations, following Kepler-91 6see also https://github.com/danxhuber/evolstate 12 Huber et al. Figure 7. Stellar radius versus effective temperature for the expected TESS Cycle 1 yield of solar-like oscillators (panel a, Schofield et al. 2018) and for all stars with confirmed transiting planets (panel b). The blue dashed line in panel a marks the approximate limit below which 2-minute cadence data is required to sample the oscillations. Symbols in panel b are color-coded according to the evolutionary state of the star using solar-metallicity PARSEC evolutionary tracks. TOI-197 falls on the border between subgiants and red-giants, and is highlighted with an orange/red/blue star symbol. TOI-197 is a typical target for which we expect to detect solar-like oscillations with TESS, but occupies a rare parameter space for an exoplanet host. (Barclay et al. 2013), Kepler-56 (Steffen et al. 2012; Hu- ber et al. 2013b), Kepler-432 (Quinn et al. 2015), K2-97 (Grunblatt et al. 2016) and K2-132 (Grunblatt et al. 2017; Jones et al. 2018). Transiting planets orbiting evolved stars are excellent systems to advance our understanding of the effects of stellar evolution on the structure and evolution of plan- ets (see e.g. Veras 2016, for a review). For example, such systems provide the possibility to test the effects of stellar mass, evolution and binarity on planet occur- rence (e.g. Johnson et al. 2010; Schlaufman & Winn 2013; Stephan et al. 2018), which are still poorly un- derstood. Furthermore, the increased irradiance on the planet caused by the evolution of the host star has been proposed as a means to distinguish between proposed mechanisms to explain the inflation of gas-giant plan- ets beyond the limits expected from gravitational con- traction and cooling (Hubbard et al. 2002; Lopez & Fortney 2016). Recent discoveries by the K2 mission have indeed yielded evidence that planets orbiting low- luminosity RGB stars are consistent with being inflated by the evolution of the host star (Grunblatt et al. 2016, 2017), favoring scenarios in which the energy from the star is deposited into the deep planetary interior (Bo- denheimer et al. 2001). Based on its radius and orbital period, TOI-197 would nominally be classified as a warm Saturn, sitting be- tween the well-known population of hot Jupiters and the ubiquitous population of sub-Neptunes uncovered by Kepler (Figure 8a). Taking into account the evolu- tionary state of the host star, however, TOI-197 falls at the beginning of the "inflation sequence" in the radius- incident flux diagram (Figure 8b), with planet radius strongly increasing with stellar incident flux (Kov´acs et al. 2010; Demory & Seager 2011; Miller & Fortney 2011; Thorngren & Fortney 2018). Since TOI-197.01 is currently not anomalously large compared to the ob- served trend and scatter for similar planets (Figure 8b) and low-mass planets are expected to be more suscepti- ble to planet reinflation (Lopez & Fortney 2016), TOI- 197 may be a progenitor of a class of re-inflated gas-giant planets orbiting RGB stars. If confirmed, the mild eccentricity of TOI-197.01 would be consistent with predictions of a population of planets around evolved stars for which orbital decay occurs faster than tidal circularization (Villaver et al. 2014; Grunblatt et al. 2018). Moreover, combining the asteroseismic age of the system with the possible non- zero eccentricity would allow constraints on the tidal dissipation in the planet, which drives the circulariza- tion of the orbit. Using the formalism by Mardling (2011) (see also Gizon et al. 2013; Davies et al. 2016; Ceillier et al. 2016), the current constraints would imply a minimum value of the planetary tidal quality factor Qp;min ≈ 3.2 × 104, below which the system would have been already circularized in ∼ 5 Gyr. Compared to the 4000500060007000Effective Temperature (K)100101Radius (Solar)(a)4000500060007000Effective Temperature (K)100101Radius (Solar)(b)DwarfsSubgiantsGiantsTOI-197 13 Figure 8. Planet radius versus orbital period (panel a) and incident flux (panel b) for confirmed exoplanets. Symbols are color-coded according to the evolutionary state of the host star (see Figure 7). TOI-197 b is highlighted in both panels with an orange/red/blue star symbol. value measured in Saturn (Q ≈ 1800, Lainey et al. 2017), this would demonstrate the broad diversity of dissipation observed in giant planets. Since tidal dissi- pation mechanisms vary strongly with internal structure (see e.g. Guenel et al. 2014; Ogilvie 2014; Andr´e et al. 2017), this may also contribute to understanding the internal composition of such planets. We caution, how- ever, that further RV measurements will be needed to confirm a possible non-zero eccentricity for TOI-197.01. The precise characterization of planets orbiting evolved, oscillating stars also provides valuable insights into the diversity of compositions of planets through their mean densities. TOI-197.01 falls in the transition region between Neptune and sub-Saturn sized planets for which radii increase as RP ≈ M 0.6 P , and Jovian planets for which radius is nearly constant with mass (Weiss et al. 2013; Chen & Kipping 2017, Figure 9). Recent studies of a population of sub-Saturns in the range ∼ 4 -- 8 R⊕ also found a wide variety of masses, approximately 6 -- 60 M⊕, regardless of size (Petigura et al. 2017b; Van Eylen et al. 2018). Furthermore, masses of sub-Saturns correlate strongly with host star metallicity, suggesting that metal-rich disks form more massive planet cores. TOI-197.01 demonstrates that this trend does not appear to extend to planets with sizes > 8 R⊕, given its mass of ∼ 60 M⊕ and a roughly sub-solar metallicity host star ([Fe/H] ≈ −0.08 dex). This suggests that Saturn-sized planets may follow a relatively narrow range of densities, a possible signature of the transition in the interior structure (such as the increased importance of electron degeneracy pressure, Zapolsky & Salpeter 1969) leading to different mass- Figure 9. Mass-radius diagram for confirmed planets with densities measured to better than 50%. Symbols are color- coded according to the evolutionary state of the host star (see Figure 7). TOI-197 b is highlighted with a orange/red/blue star symbol. Magenta letters show the position of solar sys- tem planets. radius relations between sub-Saturns and Jupiters. We note that TOI-197.01 is one of the most precisely char- acterized Saturn-sized planets to date, with a density uncertainty of ∼ 15%. 6. CONCLUSIONS We have presented the discovery of TOI-197.01, the first transiting planet orbiting an oscillating host star identified by TESS. Our main conclusions are as follows: 101100101102103Orbital Period (Days)101100Planet Radius (Jupiter Radii)(a)DwarfsSubgiantsGiants101100101102103104Incident Flux (Earth Units)101100Planet Radius (Jupiter Radii)(b)DwarfsSubgiantsGiants103102101100101Planet Mass (Jupiter Masses)101100Planet Radius (Jupiter Radii)JSNEDwarfs SubgiantsGiants14 Huber et al. • TOI-197 is a late subgiant / early red giant with a clear presence of mixed modes. Combined spectroscopy and asteroseismic modeling revealed that the star has just started its ascent on the red giant branch, with R(cid:63) = 2.943 ± 0.064R(cid:12), M(cid:63) = 1.212 ± 0.074M(cid:12) and near-solar age (4.9 ± 1.1 Gyr). TOI-197 is a typical oscillating star expected to be detected with TESS, and demonstrates the power of asteroseismology even with only 27 days of data. • The oscillation amplitude of TOI-197 is consistent with ensemble measurements from Kepler . This confirms that the redder bandpass of TESS com- pared to Kepler only has a small effect on the os- cillation amplitude (as expected from scaling re- lations, Kjeldsen & Bedding 1995; Ballot et al. 2011a), supporting the expected yield of thou- sands of solar-like oscillators with 2-minute ca- dence observations in the nominal TESS mission (Schofield et al. 2018). A detailed study of the asteroseismic performance of TESS will have to await ensemble measurements of noise levels and amplitudes. • TOI-197.01 is a "hot Saturn" (F = 343 ± 24F⊕, Rp = 0.836 ± 0.031 RJ, Mp = 0.190 ± 0.018 MJ) and joins a small but growing population of close- in, transiting planets orbiting evolved stars. Based on its incident flux, radius and mass, TOI-197.01 may be a precursor to the population of gas gi- ants that undergo radius re-inflation due to the increased irradiance as their host star evolves up the red-giant branch. • TOI-197.01 is one the most precisely character- ized Saturn-sized planets to date, with a density measured to ∼ 15%. TOI-197.01 does not follow the trend of increasing planet mass with host star metallicity discovered in sub-Saturns with sizes be- tween 4−8 R⊕, which has been linked to metal-rich disks preferentially forming more massive planet cores (Petigura et al. 2017b). The moderate den- sity (ρp = 0.431 ± 0.062 g cm−3) suggests that Saturn-sized planets may follow a relatively nar- row range of densities, a possible signature of the transition in the interior structure leading to dif- ferent mass-radius relations for sub-Saturns and Jupiters. TOI-197 provides a first glimpse at the strong poten- tial of TESS to characterize exoplanets using asteroseis- mology. TOI-197.01 has one the most precisely charac- terized densities of known Saturn-sized planets to date, with an uncertainty of ∼ 15%. Thanks to asteroseis- mology the planet density uncertainty is dominated by measurements of the transit depth and the radial ve- locity amplitude, and thus can be expected to further decrease with continued transit observations and radial velocity follow-up, which is readily performed given the brightness (V=8) of the star. Ensemble studies of such precisely characterized planets orbiting oscillating sub- giants can be expected to yield significant new insights on the effects of stellar evolution on exoplanets, comple- menting current intensive efforts to characterize planets orbiting dwarfs. The authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Maunakea has always had within the indige- nous Hawai'ian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain. We thank Andrei Tokovinin for helpful in- formation on the Speckle observations obtained with SOAR. D.H. acknowledges support by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through the TESS Guest Investigator Program (80NSSC18K1585) and by the National Science Foundation (AST-1717000). A.C. acknowledges support by the National Science Foundation under the Graduate Research Fellowship Program. W.J.C., W.H.B., A.M., O.J.H. and G.R.D. acknowledge support from the Science and Technol- ogy Facilities Council and UK Space Agency. H.K. and F.G. acknowledge support from the European So- cial Fund via the Lithuanian Science Council grant No. 09.3.3-LMT-K-712-01-0103. Funding for the Stel- lar Astrophysics Centre is provided by The Danish Na- tional Research Foundation (Grant DNRF106). A.J. ac- knowledges support from FONDECYT project 1171208, CONICYT project BASAL AFB-170002, and by the Ministry for the Economy, Development, and Tourism's Programa Iniciativa Cient´ıfica Milenio through grant IC 120009, awarded to the Millennium Institute of As- trophysics (MAS). R.B. acknowledges support from FONDECYT Post-doctoral Fellowship Project 3180246, and from the Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS). A.M.S. is supported by grants ESP2017-82674- R (MINECO) and SGR2017-1131 (AGAUR). R.A.G. and L.B. acknowledge the support of the PLATO grant from the CNES. The research leading to the presented results has received funding from the Eu- ropean Research Council under the European Com- munity's Seventh Framework Programme (FP72007- 2013) ERC grant agreement no 338251 (StellarAges). S.M. acknowledges support from the European Research Council through the SPIRE grant 647383. This work TOI-197 15 was also supported by FCT (Portugal) through na- tional funds and by FEDER through COMPETE2020 by these grants: UID/FIS/04434/2013 & POCI-01- 0145-FEDER-007672, PTDC/FIS-AST/30389/2017 & POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030389. T.L.C. acknowledges support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 re- search and innovation programme under the Marie Sk(cid:32)lodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 792848 (PUL- SATION). E.C. is funded by the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program un- der the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 664931. V.S.A. acknowledges support from the In- dependent Research Fund Denmark (Research grant 7027-00096B). D.S. acknowledges support from the Aus- tralian Research Council. S.B. acknowledges NASA grant NNX16AI09G and NSF grant AST-1514676. T.R.W. acknowledges support from the Australian Re- search Council through grant DP150100250. A.M. ac- knowledges support from the ERC Consolidator Grant funding scheme (project ASTEROCHRONOMETRY, G.A. n. 772293). S.M. acknowledges support from the Ramon y Cajal fellowship number RYC-2015- 17697. M.S.L. is supported by the Carlsberg Foundation (Grant agreement no.: CF17-0760). A.M. and P.R. ac- knowledge support from the HBCSE-NIUS programme. J.K.T. and J.T. acknowledge that support for this work was provided by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grants HST-HF2-51399.001 and HST-HF2-51424.001 awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Re- search in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS5-26555. T.S.R. acknowledges financial support from Premiale 2015 MITiC (PI B. Garilli). This project has been supported by the NKFIH K-115709 grant and the Lendulet Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, project No. LP2018-7/2018. Based on observations made with the Hertzsprung SONG telescope operated on the Spanish Observatorio del Teide on the island of Tenerife by the Aarhus and Copenhagen Universities and by the Instituto de As- trofsica de Canarias. Funding for the TESS mission is provided by NASA's Science Mission directorate. We acknowledge the use of public TESS Alert data from pipelines at the TESS Science Office and at the TESS Science Processing Operations Center. This research has made use of the Exoplanet Follow-up Observation Program website, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology, under contract with the Na- tional Aeronautics and Space Administration under the Exoplanet Exploration Program. This paper includes data collected by the TESS mission, which are publicly available from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST). Software: Astropy(AstropyCollaborationetal.2018), Matplotlib (Hunter 2007), DIAMONDS (Corsaro & De Ridder 2014), isoclassify (Huber et al. 2017), EXOFASTv2 (Eastman 2017), ktransit (Barclay 2018) REFERENCES Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2012, Royal Society Barclay, T. 2018, ktransit: Exoplanet transit modeling tool of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 370, 2765, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0269 in python, Astrophysics Source Code Library. http://ascl.net/1807.028 Andr´e, Q., Barker, A. J., & Mathis, S. 2017, A&A, 605, Barclay, T., Rowe, J. F., Lissauer, J. J., et al. 2013, Nature, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730765 494, 452, doi: 10.1038/nature11914 Appourchaux, T., Chaplin, W. J., Garc´ıa, R. A., et al. Bastien, F. A., Stassun, K. G., Basri, G., & Pepper, J. 2012, A&A, 543, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201218948 2013, Nature, 500, 427, doi: 10.1038/nature12419 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sipocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Basu, S., & Chaplin, W. J. 2017, Asteroseismic Data Analysis: Foundations and Techniques Baglin, A., Auvergne, M., Boisnard, L., et al. 2006, in 36th Bazot, M., Vauclair, S., Bouchy, F., & Santos, N. C. 2005, COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Vol. 36, 3749 A&A, 440, 615, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052698 Ball, W. H., & Gizon, L. 2017, A&A, 600, A128, Bedding, T. R. 2012, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630260 Ballard, S., Chaplin, W. J., Charbonneau, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 12, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/1/12 Conference Series, Vol. 462, Progress in Solar/Stellar Physics with Helio- and Asteroseismology, ed. H. Shibahashi, M. Takata, & A. E. Lynas-Gray, 195 Ballot, J., Barban, C., & van't Veer-Menneret, C. 2011a, Bedding, T. R., Kjeldsen, H., Arentoft, T., et al. 2007, ApJ, A&A, 531, 124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016230 663, 1315, doi: 10.1086/518593 Ballot, J., Gizon, L., Samadi, R., et al. 2011b, A&A, 530, Bell, K. J., Hekker, S., & Kuszlewicz, J. S. 2019, MNRAS, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116547 482, 616, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2731 16 Huber et al. Benomar, O., Baudin, F., Chaplin, W. J., Elsworth, Y., & Chontos, A., Huber, D., Latham, D. W., et al. 2019, AJ, in Appourchaux, T. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2178, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20184.x press, arXiv:1903.01591. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01591 Benomar, O., Masuda, K., Shibahashi, H., & Suto, Y. 2014, Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 13, PASJ, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psu069 doi: 10.1007/s10509-007-9675-5 Berger, T. A., Huber, D., Gaidos, E., & van Saders, J. L. Ciardi, D. R., Beichman, C. A., Horch, E. P., & Howell, 2018, ApJ, 866, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aada83 Bodenheimer, P., Lin, D. N. C., & Mardling, R. A. 2001, ApJ, 548, 466, doi: 10.1086/318667 Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 977, doi: 10.1126/science.1185402 Bouchy, F., Bazot, M., Santos, N. C., Vauclair, S., & Sosnowska, D. 2005, A&A, 440, 609, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052697 Bovy, J., Rix, H.-W., Green, G. M., Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2016, ApJ, 818, 130, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/130 Brahm, R., Jord´an, A., & Espinoza, N. 2017a, PASP, 129, 034002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aa5455 Brahm, R., Jord´an, A., Hartman, J., & Bakos, G. 2017b, MNRAS, 467, 971, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx144 Brahm, R., Espinoza, N., Jord´an, A., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.02156 Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x Buchhave, L. A., Latham, D. W., Johansen, A., et al. 2012, Nature, 486, 375, doi: 10.1038/nature11121 Bugnet, L., Garc´ıa, R. A., Davies, G. R., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833106 Campante, T. L. 2018, Asteroseismology and Exoplanets: Listening to the Stars and Searching for New Worlds, 49, 55, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-59315-9 3 Campante, T. L., Lund, M. N., Kuszlewicz, J. S., et al. 2016a, ApJ, 819, 85, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/85 Campante, T. L., Schofield, M., Kuszlewicz, J. S., et al. 2016b, ApJ, 830, 138, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/138 Ceillier, T., van Saders, J., Garc´ıa, R. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 119, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2622 Chaplin, W. J., Elsworth, Y., Davies, G. R., et al. 2014a, MNRAS, 445, 946, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1811 Chaplin, W. J., & Miglio, A. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 353, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140938 S. B. 2015, ApJ, 805, 16, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/16 Claret, A., & Bloemen, S. 2011, A&A, 529, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116451 Corsaro, E., & De Ridder, J. 2014, A&A, 571, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424181 Corsaro, E., De Ridder, J., & Garc´ıa, R. A. 2015, A&A, 579, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525895 Corsaro, E., Frohlich, H.-E., Bonanno, A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2313, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt059 Corsaro, E., Mathur, S., Garc´ıa, R. A., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731094 Creevey, O. L., Metcalfe, T. S., Schultheis, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629496 Cunha, M. S., Stello, D., Avelino, P. P., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., & Townsend, R. H. D. 2015, ApJ, 805, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/127 Davies, G. R., & Miglio, A. 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 774, doi: 10.1002/asna.201612371 Davies, G. R., Silva Aguirre, V., Bedding, T. R., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 2183, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2593 Deheuvels, S., & Michel, E. 2011, A&A, 535, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117232 Demarque, P., Guenther, D. B., Li, L. H., Mazumdar, A., & Straka, C. W. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 31, doi: 10.1007/s10509-007-9698-y Demory, B.-O., & Seager, S. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 197, 12, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/12 Eastman, J. 2017, EXOFASTv2: Generalized publication-quality exoplanet modeling code, Astrophysics Source Code Library. http://ascl.net/1710.003 Eastman, J., Gaudi, B. S., & Agol, E. 2013, PASP, 125, 83, doi: 10.1086/669497 Evans, D. W., Riello, M., De Angeli, F., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832756 Chaplin, W. J., Basu, S., Huber, D., et al. 2014b, ApJS, Fur´esz, G. 2008, PhD thesis, University of Szeged, Szeged, 210, 1, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/1 Chen, J., & Kipping, D. 2017, ApJ, 834, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/17 Hungary Furlan, E., Ciardi, D. R., Everett, M. E., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/71 Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102, Garc´ıa, R. A., Hekker, S., Stello, D., et al. 2011, MNRAS, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 414, L6, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01042.x TOI-197 17 Garc´ıa, R. A., Ceillier, T., Salabert, D., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423888 Gilbert, J., Bergmann, C., Bloxham, G., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10702, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, 107020Y Gilliland, R. L., McCullough, P. R., Nelan, E. P., et al. 2011, ApJ, 726, 2, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/2 Jenkins, J. M., Twicken, J. D., McCauliff, S., et al. 2016, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 9913, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV, 99133E Johnson, J. A., Aller, K. M., Howard, A. W., & Crepp, J. R. 2010, PASP, 122, 905, doi: 10.1086/655775 Johnson, J. A., Petigura, E. A., Fulton, B. J., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80e7 Jones, M. I., Brahm, R., Espinoza, N., et al. 2018, A&A, Gizon, L., Ballot, J., Michel, E., et al. 2013, Proceedings of 613, A76, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731478 the National Academy of Science, 110, 13267, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303291110 Grec, G., Fossat, E., & Pomerantz, M. A. 1983, SoPh, 82, 55 Grunblatt, S. K., Huber, D., Gaidos, E. J., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 185, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/185 Grunblatt, S. K., Huber, D., Gaidos, E., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 254, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa932d -- . 2018, ApJL, 861, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aacc67 Grundahl, F., Fredslund Andersen, M., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/142 Guenel, M., Mathis, S., & Remus, F. 2014, A&A, 566, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424010 Handberg, R., Brogaard, K., Miglio, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 979, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1929 Handberg, R., & Campante, T. L. 2011, A&A, 527, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015451 Handberg, R., & Lund, M. N. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2698, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1823 Hekker, S., Elsworth, Y., De Ridder, J., et al. 2011, A&A, 525, A131, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015185 Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al. 2000, A&A, 355, L27 Hubbard, W. B., Burrows, A., & Lunine, J. I. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 103, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093917 Huber, D., Stello, D., Bedding, T. R., et al. 2009, Communications in Asteroseismology, 160, 74. https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.2764 Kallinger, T., Beck, P. G., Stello, D., & Garcia, R. A. 2018, A&A, 616, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832831 Kallinger, T., Hekker, S., Garcia, R. A., Huber, D., & Matthews, J. M. 2016, Science Advances, 2, 1500654, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500654 Kallinger, T., Hekker, S., Mosser, B., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, A51, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201218854 Kaufer, A., Stahl, O., Tubbesing, S., et al. 1999, The Messenger, 95, 8 Kjeldsen, H., & Bedding, T. R. 1995, A&A, 293, 87 Kjeldsen, H., Bedding, T. R., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2008a, ApJL, 683, L175, doi: 10.1086/591667 Kjeldsen, H., Bedding, T. R., Butler, R. P., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 1281, doi: 10.1086/497530 Kjeldsen, H., Bedding, T. R., Arentoft, T., et al. 2008b, ApJ, 682, 1370, doi: 10.1086/589142 Kov´acs, G., Bakos, G. ´A., Hartman, J. D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, 866, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/866 Lainey, V., Jacobson, R. A., Tajeddine, R., et al. 2017, Icarus, 281, 286, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.07.014 Lebreton, Y., & Goupil, M. J. 2014, A&A, 569, A21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423797 Lenz, P., & Breger, M. 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53, doi: 10.1553/cia146s53 Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. 2016, ApJ, 818, 4, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/4 Lund, M. N., Handberg, R., Davies, G. R., Chaplin, W. J., & Jones, C. D. 2015, ApJ, 806, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/30 Huber, D., Bedding, T. R., Arentoft, T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, 94, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/731/2/94 Huber, D., Chaplin, W. J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., et al. 2013a, ApJ, 767, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/127 Huber, D., Carter, J. A., Barbieri, M., et al. 2013b, Science, 342, 331. https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4503 Lund, M. N., Handberg, R., Kjeldsen, H., Chaplin, W. J., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2017, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, Vol. 160, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, 01005 Lund, M. N., Lundkvist, M., Silva Aguirre, V., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424326 Huber, D., Bryson, S. T., Haas, M. R., et al. 2017, ApJ, Lundkvist, M. S. 2015, PhD thesis, Stellar Astrophysics 224, 2, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/2 Centre, Aarhus University, Denmark Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, Lundkvist, M. S., Kjeldsen, H., Albrecht, S., et al. 2016, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 Iben, Jr., I. 1965, ApJ, 142, 1447, doi: 10.1086/148429 Nature Communications, 7, 11201, doi: 10.1038/ncomms11201 18 Huber et al. Mann, A. W., Newton, E. R., Rizzuto, A. C., et al. 2016, Quinn, S. N., White, T. R., Latham, D. W., et al. 2015, AJ, 152, 61, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/3/61 ApJ, 803, 49, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/49 Mardling, R. A. 2011, in European Physical Journal Web of Rayner, J., Bond, T., Bonnet, M., et al. 2012, in Conferences, Vol. 11, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, 03002 Proc. SPIE, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, 84462C Mathur, S., Garc´ıa, R. A., R´egulo, C., et al. 2010, A&A, Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2014, in 511, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913266 Mathur, S., Hekker, S., Trampedach, R., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 119, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/119 Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., et al. 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20 Miller, N., & Fortney, J. J. 2011, ApJL, 736, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/736/2/L29 Morel, P., & Lebreton, Y. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 61, doi: 10.1007/s10509-007-9663-9 Mosser, B., Elsworth, Y., Hekker, S., et al. 2012a, A&A, 537, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117352 Mosser, B., Goupil, M. J., Belkacem, K., et al. 2012b, A&A, 548, A10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220106 Mosser, B., Benomar, O., Belkacem, K., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425039 Mosumgaard, J. R., Ball, W. H., Silva Aguirre, V., Weiss, A., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 5650, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1442 Nielsen, L. D., Bouchy, F., Turner, O., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834577 Ogilvie, G. I. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 171, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035941 Ong, J. M. J., & Basu, S. 2019, ApJ, 870, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf1b5 Pande, D., Bedding, T. R., Huber, D., & Kjeldsen, H. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 467, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1869 Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4 Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 Pesnell, W. D. 1990, ApJ, 363, 227, doi: 10.1086/169333 Petigura, E. 2015, PhD Thesis, University of California. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.03902 Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2017a, AJ, 154, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80de Petigura, E. A., Sinukoff, E., Lopez, E. D., et al. 2017b, AJ, 153, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5ea5 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9143, , 20 Rodrigues, T. S., Girardi, L., Miglio, A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2758, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1907 Rodrigues, T. S., Bossini, D., Miglio, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1433, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx120 Roxburgh, I. W. 2017, A&A, 604, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731057 Schlaufman, K. C., & Winn, J. N. 2013, ApJ, 772, 143, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/143 Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772 Schofield, M., Chaplin, W. J., Huber, D., et al. 2018, ApJS, submitted Scuflaire, R., Montalb´an, J., Th´eado, S., et al. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 149, doi: 10.1007/s10509-007-9577-6 Serenelli, A., Johnson, J., Huber, D., et al. 2017, ApJS, 233, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa97df Silva Aguirre, V., Davies, G. R., Basu, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2127, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1388 Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708 Sliski, D. H., & Kipping, D. M. 2014, ApJ, 788, 148, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/148 Smith, J. C., Stumpe, M. C., Van Cleve, J. E., et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 1000, doi: 10.1086/667697 Sousa, S. G. 2014, ARES + MOOG: A Practical Overview of an Equivalent Width (EW) Method to Derive Stellar Parameters, ed. E. Niemczura, B. Smalley, & W. Pych, 297 -- 310 Sousa, S. G., Adibekyan, V., Delgado-Mena, E., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833350 Stassun, K. G., & Torres, G. 2016, AJ, 152, 180, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/180 -- . 2018, ApJ, 862, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aacafc Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Pepper, J., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad050 Steffen, J. H., Ragozzine, D., Fabrycky, D. C., et al. 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 109, 7982, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120970109 Pires, S., Mathur, S., Garc´ıa, R. A., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, Stello, D., Zinn, J., Elsworth, Y., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 83, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322361 doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/83 Queloz, D., Mayor, M., Udry, S., et al. 2001, The Stephan, A. P., Naoz, S., & Gaudi, B. S. 2018, AJ, 156, Messenger, 105, 1 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad6e5 TOI-197 19 Stumpe, M. C., Smith, J. C., Catanzarite, J. H., et al. 2014, Verner, G. A., Elsworth, Y., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2011, PASP, 126, 100, doi: 10.1086/674989 Tayar, J., & Pinsonneault, M. H. 2018, ApJ, 868, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae979 Tayar, J., Stassun, K. G., & Corsaro, E. 2018, arXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04010 Thorngren, D. P., & Fortney, J. J. 2018, AJ, 155, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaba13 Tokovinin, A., Mason, B. D., & Hartkopf, W. I. 2010, AJ, 139, 743, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/2/743 MNRAS, 415, 3539, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18968.x Villaver, E., Livio, M., Mustill, A. J., & Siess, L. 2014, ApJ, 794, 3, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/3 Vogt, S. S., Allen, S. L., Bigelow, B. C., et al. 1994, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 2198, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. D. L. Crawford & E. R. Craine, 362 Vrard, M., Mosser, B., Barban, C., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, Torres, G., Fischer, D. A., Sozzetti, A., et al. 2012, ApJ, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425064 757, 161, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/161 Wang, S., Jones, M., Shporer, A., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 51, Townsend, R. H. D., & Teitler, S. A. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 3406, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1533 Van Eylen, V., & Albrecht, S. 2015, ApJ, 808, 126, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/126 Van Eylen, V., Dai, F., Mathur, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4866, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1390 Van Eylen, V., Albrecht, S., Huang, X., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf22f doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf1b7 Weiss, L. M., Marcy, G. W., Rowe, J. F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 14, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/14 Weiss, W. W., Moffat, A. F. J., & Kudelka, O. 2008, Communications in Asteroseismology, 157, 271 White, T. R., Bedding, T. R., Stello, D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 161, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/161 Wittenmyer, R. A., Endl, M., Wang, L., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 184, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/184 Wizinowich, P., Acton, D. S., Shelton, C., et al. 2000, van Saders, J. L., Ceillier, T., Metcalfe, T. S., et al. 2016, PASP, 112, 315, doi: 10.1086/316543 Nature, 529, 181, doi: 10.1038/nature16168 van Saders, J. L., & Pinsonneault, M. H. 2013, ApJ, 776, 67, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/67 Vanzi, L., Zapata, A., Flores, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 5041, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty936 Veras, D. 2016, Royal Society Open Science, 3, 150571, doi: 10.1098/rsos.150571 Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 Yıldız, M., C¸ elik Orhan, Z., & Kayhan, C. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1577, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1709 Yu, J., Huber, D., Bedding, T. R., & Stello, D. 2018, MNRAS, 480, L48, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly123 Zapolsky, H. S., & Salpeter, E. E. 1969, ApJ, 158, 809, doi: 10.1086/150240
1708.00693	1	1708	2017-08-02T10:42:06	WASP-12b: A Mass-Losing Extremely Hot Jupiter	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	WASP-12b is an extreme hot Jupiter in a 1 day orbit, suffering profound irradiation from its F type host star. The planet is surrounded by a translucent exosphere which overfills the Roche lobe and produces line-blanketing absorption in the near-UV. The planet is losing mass. Another unusual property of the WASP-12 system is that observed chromospheric emission from the star is anomalously low: WASP-12 is an extreme outlier amongst thousands of stars when the log $R^{'}_{HK}$ chromospheric activity indicator is considered. Occam's razor suggests these two extremely rare properties coincide in this system because they are causally related. The absence of the expected chromospheric emission is attributable to absorption by a diffuse circumstellar gas shroud which surrounds the entire planetary system and fills our line of sight to the chromospherically active regions of the star. This circumstellar gas shroud is probably fed by mass loss from WASP-12b. The orbital eccentricity of WASP-12b is small but may be non-zero. The planet is part of a hierarchical quadruple system; its current orbit is consistent with prior secular dynamical evolution leading to a highly eccentric orbit followed by tidal circularization. When compared with the Galaxy's population of planets, WASP-12b lies on the upper boundary of the sub-Jovian desert in both the $(M_{\rm P}, P)$ and $(R_{\rm P}, P)$ planes. Determining the mass loss rate for WASP-12b will illuminate the mechanism(s) responsible for the sub-Jovian desert.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	WASP-12b: A Mass-Losing Extremely Hot Jupiter Carole A. Haswell School of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected] Text finalised June 2017. Submitted 2nd August 2017. Abstract WASP-12b is an extreme hot Jupiter in a 1 day orbit, suffering profound irradiation from its F type host star. The planet is surrounded by a translucent exosphere which overfills the Roche lobe and produces line-blanketing absorption in the near-UV. The planet is losing mass. Another unusual property of the WASP-12 system is that observed chromospheric emission from the star is anomalously low: WASP-12 is an extreme outlier amongst thousands of stars when the log R'HK chromospheric activity indicator is considered. Occam's razor suggests these two extremely rare properties coincide in this system because they are causally related. The absence of the expected chromospheric emission is attributable to absorption by a diffuse circumstellar gas shroud which surrounds the entire planetary system and fills our line of sight to the chromospherically active regions of the star. This circumstellar gas shroud is probably fed by mass loss from WASP-12b. The orbital eccentricity of WASP-12b is small but may be non-zero. The planet is part of a hierarchical quadruple system; its current orbit is consistent with prior secular dynamical evolution leading to a highly eccentric orbit followed by tidal circularization. When compared with the Galaxy's population of planets, WASP-12b lies on the upper boundary of the sub-Jovian desert in both the (MP, P) and (RP, P) planes. Determining the mass loss rate for WASP-12b will illuminate the mechanism(s) responsible for the sub-Jovian desert. Introduction In 1995 our preconceptions about planetary systems were challenged with the discovery of 51 Peg b, the first hot Jupiter (Mayor and Queloz 1995). The subject of this Chapter, WASP-12b, is one of the hottest of the hot Jupiters, and its extreme properties have encouraged many studies. This contribution focuses on the phenomenon of mass loss from this extreme planet and on its implications for the exoplanet population, without attempting to be an exhaustive review of other properties. WASP-12b was an early discovery by the SuperWASP planet search; its large radius, RP = 1.7 RJ, and short orbital period, P=1.09 d, both contribute to favourable probabilities for detection by transit (see e.g. Haswell 2010 for details.) WASP-12b orbits an F star (Hebb et al 2009), which, along with the very short orbital period, means it is among the most irradiated of the known exoplanets. The planet mass is MP = 1.4 MJ and the orbital semi-major axis is 0.023 AU. Of these planet parameters, as so often in astronomy, the period is by far the best determined. The other planet parameters rest upon our knowledge of the basic stellar parameters, and their 1 reported uncertainties often do not completely propagate our uncertainties about the host star. Haswell (2010) gives an explanation of the derivation of the fundamental parameters for transiting planets. The host star of this extreme hot Jupiter, WASP-12, has effective temperature Teff = 6250±100 K and surface gravity log g = 4.2± 0.2 and is metal rich compared to the Sun; the star's age is between 1 and 2.65 Gyr and its mass M* is between 1.23Mʘ and 1.49 Mʘ (Fossati et al 2010a, Hebb et al 2009). The planet's orbit places it only about 1.5 stellar radii above the star's photosphere, making it an extreme hot Jupiter. Swain et al (2013) found that WASP-12b's near-IR brightness temperature is around 3000K, approximately twice that of the archetypal hot Jupiters HD 189733b and HD 209458b. The distance to WASP-12 is less precisely known, with Fossati et al (2010a) finding a possible range of 295-465 pc. These limits are based on the star's securely measured effective temperature and surface gravity; narrower uncertainty ranges have been quoted elsewhere, but these ranges may rest upon debatable assumptions. See Fossati et al (2010a) for a detailed discussion of WASP-12's fundamental parameters, including the distance. The seminal UV observations of the first known transiting exoplanet, HD 209458b, by Vidal-Madjar et al (2003), showed that hot Jupiter planets are surrounded by extensive exospheres. HD 209458b produces a 15% deep transit in the Lyman α line, indicating the planet is surrounded by an exosphere with radius > 3 RP and containing neutral hydrogen. UV observations underpin the study of exoplanet exospheres because this spectral region contains strong resonance lines of many common species. Strong resonance lines have large oscillator strengths and involve the ground state and can thus be detected even when the emitting or absorbing column density is modest. Consequently, these lines are (i) prominent in the emission from stellar chromospheres and (ii) provide a particularly sensitive probe for the presence of diffuse gas surrounding a planet. Taken together, this means the UV contains many features which are particularly useful for transmission spectroscopy of transiting planets. UV Observations of WASP-12b transits It was immediately clear upon the discovery of WASP-12b that this system is a good candidate to search for exospheric gas surrounding the planet. The short orbital period combined with the inflated planet radius mean that the planet fills a substantial fraction of its Roche lobe. WASP-12b remains one of the three known giant planets with the largest Roche lobe filling factor (Busuttil 2017). Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations were promptly proposed after the discovery. The obvious goal was to perform transmission spectroscopy covering Lyman α to determine the extent of the HI exosphere for such a strongly irradiated planet. This proved impractical because WASP-12 is 6 to 10 times more distant than HD 209458b and consequently the predicted stellar photon count-rate for WASP-12 was too low. HD 209458b at 47 pc is close enough for a precise distance determination by Hipparcos parallax measurements, so produced good far UV count-rates despite there being so little stellar flux in the far-UV region which contains Lyman α. To overcome the distance of WASP-12 and the intrinsic faintness of FGK stars in the far UV, 2 the first HST observations of WASP-12 pioneered HST transmission spectroscopy in the near-UV wavelength range, λλ 2539 – 2829 Å (Haswell et al 2012) where the underlying stellar photospheric flux is enhanced by a factor of ~106. This proved to be an extremely informative wavelength region. Despite this, it has remained under-exploited in subsequent studies of exoplanet exospheres. Hubble Space Telescope Cosmic Origins Spectrograph observations of WASP-12b The observations presented in Haswell et al (2012) are a superset of those presented in Fossati et al (2010b) and used the slitless Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) to obtain 10 HST orbits of R~20,000 near-UV spectroscopy. COS records data in three wavelength regions known as 'stripes' A, B and C. This data was obtained on two distinct HST visits, each centred on a transit of WASP-12b; the visits were timed so that the orbital coverage of WASP-12b interleaves. The two visits used slightly different grating settings, so that each of the 3 stripes only partially overlaps in wavelength between the two visits. The significantly noiser data subsequently obtained and reported by Nichols et al (2015) used exclusively the Visit 1 setting of Haswell et al (2012). The near-UV spectral region contains thousands of overlapping photospheric absorption lines. The strongest of these are resonance lines, including the Mg II h&k lines, Mn II 2577Å and Fe II 2586Å which can be easily picked out in Figure 17 of Haswell et al (2012). Unevolved stars generally exhibit chromospheric emission in the line cores of these features. The plethora of weaker lines blend to produce substantial stellar photospheric absorption of the stellar continuum which illuminates the bottom of the stellar photosphere. This line-blanketing stellar photospheric absorption is strongest in the C stripe, and weakest but still approaching 50% in the B stripe, as shown in Figure 1 of Haswell et al (2012). Photometric Analysis Because slightly different wavelength regions were covered, it is impossible to produce a set of homogeneous light curves including all the photons collected in the observations reported in Haswell et al (2012). The comprehensive analysis is described in detail in the original paper, the broad conclusions are summarised here. In both visits, the transit of WASP-12b in the near-UV region is deeper than that of the opaque planet, indicating that the planet is surrounded by an exosphere of strongly absorbing gas. In the first visit, reported by Fossati et al (2010b), the relative depths of the transits in the A, B, and C stripes corresponds roughly to the relative amounts of absorption in these regions within the stellar atmosphere. The near-UV-absorbing gas thus appears to have a temperature and composition similar to those of a stellar photosphere. This finding was independently corroborated by the interpretation of IR transmission spectroscopy and secondary eclipse data by Swain et al (2013). The transit depth in the A and C stripes of Visit 1 of Haswell et al (2012) is 3.5%, which makes it clear that the absorbing gas surrounding WASP-12b overfills the planet's Roche lobe, at least some of the time. In turn, 3 this implies that WASP-12b is losing mass. In detail, the repeated observations reported in Haswell et al (2012) and Nichols et al (2015) do not reproduce the shape of the Visit 1 transit light curve. In particular the early ingress for Visit 1 reported in Fossati et al (2010b) is not a general feature. Visit 2 of Haswell et al (2012) instead shows a high point at the phase of optical ingress: Visit 2 and the four visits of Nichols et al (2015) suggest the absorbing gas is patchy, and its spatial coverage as seen from our vantage point extends to the earliest observed orbital phases, at around φ=0.83. Figure 9 of Carroll-Nellenback et al (2017) visualises the dispersed material lost in a hydrodynamic outflow from a hot Jupiter. It shows a patchy distribution of material which extends azimuthally to surround the star. The patchy and variable absorption observed in the near-UV lightcurves of WASP-12, as described in Haswell et al (2012) and Nichols et al (2015), is consistent with this picture. Spectroscopic Analysis Despite the extension of absorbing gas spread azimuthally around the orbit of WASP-12b, there is a consistent relative overdensity around the planet itself. There is clear evidence for this: the near-UV light curves consistently show fluxes during transit which are depressed by more than the 1.5% dip caused by the opaque planet itself (Fossati et al 2010b, Haswell et al 2012, Nichols et al 2015). This means that the unocculted light from the star suffers from increased absorption at phases where the planet is in transit compared to that at other observed phases. This can be seen for individual lines, too: there is evidence from the very strong Mg II h&k lines that there is some absorption from diffuse gas at all observed phases (see below), but despite this we can perform transmission spectroscopy by comparing spectra obtained during transit with those obtained away from transit. The comparison allows us to identify excess absorption attributable to the higher column density of intervening diffuse gas during the planet transit. Fossati et al (2010b) performed transmission spectroscopy of WASP-12b for Visit 1 of Haswell et al (2012) finding enhanced transit depths at the wavelengths of resonance lines of neutral sodium, tin, and manganese, and of singly ionised ytterbium, scandium, manganese, aluminium, vanadium and magnesium. Haswell et al (2012) detected repeated enhanced absorption during transit in 65 distinct features. These features include exospheric absorption throughout the inner wings of the very strong Mg II h&k lines on both visits and a detection of exospheric absorption in Fe II 2586Å, which remains the heaviest species detected in an exoplanet transit. Absorption at these individual features is accompanied by line-blanketing absorption which accumulates to produce the broad-band absorption seen in the near-UV light curves. Not all the features in the WASP-12b transmission spectrum can be unambiguously identified (Haswell et al 2012). In particular, in some cases it is unclear whether a feature is due to a resonance line of a rare element or a weaker feature of a more abundant element, or a blend of the two. These cases should be revisited in the future when we have a better understanding of the composition of WASP-12b's outer layers and the mechanisms underlying the mass loss which feeds the exospheric gas. 4 WASP-12's missing chromospheric emission in MgII h&k All the observations of WASP-12's Mg II h&k lines show zero flux in the line cores (Fossati et al 2010b, Haswell et al 2012, Nichols et al 2015). The strong Fe II 2586Å line, covered only in Visit 2 of Haswell et al 2012, is also consistent with zero flux in the line core. This makes WASP-12's observed spectrum unique: all other main sequence or slightly evolved stars of WASP-12's spectral type show chromospheric emission in these features. A basal level of chromospheric flux is seen even for old, slowly rotating, inactive stars of this type. Occam's razor suggests that this anomaly in WASP-12's spectrum is related to the extreme exoplanet it hosts. Haswell et al (2012) examined the possibility that the Mg II h&k line core flux is absorbed by the interstellar medium (ISM), concluding that an anomalously over-dense line of sight would be required. The missing chromospheric emission in Mg II h&k and the Fe II 2586Å line is more likely to be absorbed locally by a diffuse circumstellar gas shroud fed by the mass-loss from the overflowing exosphere of the extreme hot Jupiter planet WASP-12b. Stellar Chromospheric emission shrouded by planetary mass loss The Mg II h&k lines can only be observed from space because their wavelengths are in the UV. However, the analogous resonance lines of the singly ionised element from the next period in the periodic table, Ca, are in the optical and are accessible from the ground. Consequently, the Ca II H&K lines (λλ 3968Å, 3933Å) are commonly-used indicators of stellar chromospheric activity, usually parameterised in terms of log R'HK (Noyes et al 1984). This particular metric is useful because it allows intercomparison of the activity levels of F, G, and K type stars on a conveniently calibrated scale; see Staab et al (2017), their Figures 2 & 7, for an illustration of how log R'HK is defined. In particular, for a main sequence FGK star, log R'HK is expected to exceed a value of -5.1 which corresponds to a basal level of activity observed in the oldest, least active, slowest rotating stars of this type. The basal emission persists even when stars are completely devoid of active regions (Schröder et al 2012). WASP-12 lies significantly below this limit with log R'HK= -5.5, a value determined by Knutson et al (2010) who did not remark upon its anomalous nature. There has been significant interest in the measured log R'HK values of transiting planet host stars as there appears to be a correlation between the host star's log R'HK value and the planet's surface gravity (Hartman 2010, Figueira et al 2014, Fossati, Ingrassia & Lanza 2015). Fossati et al (2013) and Staab et al (2017) compared log R'HK for WASP-12 and other planet hosts with an extensive sample of field stars. While Staab et al (2017) show that a quarter of known host stars of close-in transiting planets show anomalously low Ca II H&K chromospheric emission, WASP-12 remains the most extreme outlier. Fossati et al (2013) and Staab et al (2017) interpret the missing Ca II H&K chromospheric emission in these close-in planet host stars as due to absorption by diffuse gas shrouding these planetary systems. This builds on and corroborates the conclusions Haswell et al 5 (2012) drew from WASP-12's missing Mg II h&k and Fe II chromospheric emission. In each of these low log R'HK systems, gas originates in an outflow from the close-in ablating planet, forming a diffuse cloud of circumstellar gas which shrouds the entire planetary system. It is plausible that the extremely irradiated planet WASP-12b has a more prodigious mass outflow than more moderately irradiated giant planets. While the detailed dynamics of these outflows is largely unexplored, it is natural to expect this to lead to a higher column density of gas in the line of sight to the chromospherically active regions of this particular star. Significantly, Staab et al (2017) show that two low-mass close-in planet hosts, Kepler-25 and Kepler-28, have anomalously low values of log R'HK, establishing that the phenomenon does not require the presence of a gas giant planet. Indeed the most observationally spectacular examples of ablating planets are the catastrophically disintegrating exoplanets (CDEs), exemplified by Kepler 1520b. The CDEs are extremely close-in planets, detected via their periodic but variable transits. The transits are attributed to a cloud of dust formed by material ablated from the rocky surface of a low mass planet irradiated to temperature T~2100K. In the case of Kepler 1520b, the planet is thought to have a mass of about 0.1M⊕. At temperatures of ~2100K rocky minerals sublime, and a thermal wind of metal- rich vapour and entrained dust flows from the planet. The entrained dust can vary in spatial distribution and optical depth, thus producing variable transits (Rappaport et al 2012). The transiting dust cloud model was confirmed when Bochinski et al (2015) detected the colour dependence of transit depth of Kepler 1520b. The known CDE host stars are sadly too distant and faint to encourage transmission spectroscopy with current facilities. WASP-12b and Mass Loss in Hot Jupiter Planets Since the discovery of the extended HI exosphere of HD 209458b there has been significant interest in the phenomenon of mass loss in hot Jupiter planets. In this section we will discuss first the models, then the relationship between the models and WASP-12b, which is the most extreme known hot Jupiter, and finally we will consider the potential future observations of WASP-12b which might clarify some of the presently open questions. Mass-loss rates in hot Jupiters: brief overview of the state of the art The discovery of the extended HI exosphere of HD 209458b stimulated prompt modelling work to calculate atmospheric loss from hot Jupiters (e.g. Lammer et al 2003). There has been much activity in this area in the intervening years, with recent papers including Jackson et al (2017) and Carroll-Nellenback et al (2017). Lammer et al (2003) showed that irradiation by stellar X-ray and extreme-UV (EUV) flux leads to atmospheric expansion, and mass-loss rates of ≈1012 g s-1 for HD 209458b. Later work (e.g. Erkaev et al 2007) incorporated the Roche potential, which lowers the energy required for atmospheric escape. In the extreme case of a Roche lobe-filling planet, there is no energy barrier to atmospheric escape through the saddle point at L1. Recent models including Tripathi et al (2015) and Jackson et al (2017) variously incorporate Roche lobe overflow, the evolutionary response 6 of the planet to mass loss, the irradiative heating and the three-dimensional hydrodynamic outflow. Computational limitations mean that no single model has yet simultaneously included all of these ingredients self-consistently, but the crucial factors which determine the mass-loss rate for close-in planets are being established and quantitatively tested. As laid out in Frank et al (2002), the mass loss rate depends critically on the comparision between the evolution of the mass donor's size and the evolution of the Roche lobe size. This in turn depends on the transfer of orbital angular momentum within the system. Valsecchi et al (2015) investigated tidally driven Roche lobe overflow of hot Jupiters within this framework, including the effects of irradiation and planet evolution. They produce evolutionary tracks tracing the mass, radius, and orbital period for 1 MJ planets orbiting 1Mʘ stars, both for conservative and non-conservative mass transfer. In conservative mass transfer all mass leaving the planet is accreted onto the star; conversely, non-conservative mass transfer means some fraction of the mass from the planet leaves the system. In non-conservative mass transfer, angular momentum will generally be lost. Observational evidence in WASP-12 and other irradiated planet host stars for the presence of circumstellar gas shrouds (Haswell et al 2012, Fossati et al 2013, Staab et al 2017) implies that mass transfer is non-conservative. This has implications for the planets' orbital evolution, which transit timing measurements over long temporal baselines can test. The case of WASP-12b As noted before, WASP-12b is among the most irradiated of exoplanets; temperatures in the outer layers of the planet's atmosphere are in the same regime as M dwarf star photospheres. It is an extremely hot Jupiter. As shown in Figure 21 of Haswell et al (2012) WASP-12b is close to filling its Roche lobe, with a volume filling fraction of 0.54 (Busuttil 2017). A planet in this configuration is expected to lose mass through hydrodynamic escape. Stellar irradiation will photoionize the upper atmosphere, with the liberated electrons causing collisional heating. This heating drives a hydrodynamic wind comprised of the constituents of the upper atmospheric gas (c.f. Erkaev et al 2007, Sanz-Forcada et al 2010, Tripathi et al 2015; Jackson et al 2017.) Bisikalo et al (2013) performed a hydrodynamic simulation of outflows from both the L1 and L2 points of WASP-12b's Roche lobe, concluding that a steady-state gaseous envelope encompassing the Roche lobe can result. This simulation did not include treatment of the photoionisation which drives the wind, instead setting a priori a temperature of 104K outside the Roche lobe. More recent work by Carroll-Nellenback et al (2017) has taken a more self-consistent approach to the dynamics of similar 'up-orbit' and 'down-orbit' outflows, though not tailored to the specific case of WASP-12b. Husnoo et al (2011), Albrecht et al (2012) and Collins et al (2017) analysed radial velocity data of WASP-12 from SOPHIE in which the Rossiter McLaughlin effect is of comparable amplitude to the systematic instrumental effects. Thus the spin of WASP-12 appears to be slow or approximately orthogonal to the orbital angular momentum of WASP-12b's orbit. For a slowly-spinning host star under the assumptions of Valsecchi et al (2015), tides 7 transfer angular momentum from the orbit to the stellar spin, causing orbital decay. For WASP-12b, there is evidence that the orbit may be tidally shrinking in this way (Maciejewski et al 2016), but see also Collins et al (2017). All these considerations imply that WASP-12b is likely to be shedding mass more rapidly than (almost?) all other known exoplanets. This is consistent with the detection of gas surrounding the planet during transit, which presents an effective obscuring area in the near-UV of up to three times that of the optically opaque planet (Haswell et al 2012), and in excess of the cross-section presented by the planet's Roche lobe. The anomalously depressed stellar chromospheric emission from WASP-12 at all observed orbital phases is also consistent with dispersed gas shrouding the entire planetary system. Haswell et al (2012), Fossati et al (2013) and Staab et al (2017) show that WASP-12 has the lowest chromospheric emission of any star measured, which suggests that either the intrinsic stellar activity is extremely low, WASP-12b's mass loss is prodigious and produces a higher column depth of shrouding circumstellar gas than is present in any other system, or both. WASP-12b may be in the early stages of the evolutionary phase discussed by Valsecchi et al (2014). They suggest Roche lobe-filling hot Jupiters may lose their entire gaseous envelopes, leaving hot super-Earths. The 'up-orbit' stream of Carroll-Nellenback et al (2017) can be accelerated away from the star due to ram pressure from the stellar wind. The simulations neglect radiation pressure: the absorption of stellar emission found by Fossati et al (2010b), Haswell et al (2012) and Nichols et al (2015) guarantees radiation pressure will tend to drive WASP-12's circumstellar gas outwards. The quantitative self-consistent numerical calculations of mass loss rates for particular hot Jupiter systems have generally been tailored to more moderately irradiated planets at larger orbital distances. Bisikalo et al (2013) did not calculate a mass loss rate for WASP-12b. The value of mass loss rate of 10-7 MJ year-1 calculated by Li et al (2010) for WASP-12b was predicated on an erroneous non-zero eccentricity inferred from the discovery paper radial velocity data (Hebb et al 2009). Husnoo et al (2011) subsequently derived e=0.017 +0.015 -0.010, i.e. an approximately circular orbit. Lai et al (2010) obtained a mass loss rate 25 times lower with assumptions of an isothermal planet atmosphere of 3000K, a density at L1 of 3×1012 g cm-3 and a nozzle for Roche lobe overflow which is of linear size of 0.6 planet radii. It is fair to say not all of these assumptions are supported in detail. For example, using atmospheric structure models motivated by the observations of Swain et al (2013) and Mandell et al (2013) can change the mass loss rate by four orders of magnitude. Thus the mass loss rate for WASP-12b remains undetermined. Observations to determine the mass loss rate of WASP-12b The flux of ionising stellar radiation upon the planet is a crucial parameter for calculations of the photoevaporative mass loss from hot Jupiters. For stars of WASP-12's spectral type and late type stars generally, this flux largely arises from stellar activity. The Mg II and Ca II lines indicate that WASP-12's apparent chromospheric activity is anomalously low, but unless the star is unique, this must be due to absorption of the intrinsic chromospheric 8 emission. The ionising flux could in principle be directly measured, but WASP-12 is too distant for this to be practical, because ionising flux is strongly absorbed by the ISM (see Fossati et al 2013 for a general discussion of the effects of interstellar absorption on the observed chromospheric emission from exoplanet host stars). An alternative approach would be to take a spectrum in the far-UV (i.e around 1100- 2500 Å) as Fossati et al (2015) have done for WASP-13. This wavelength region contains strong chromospheric emission lines of ionised species including C IV and Si IV. Because these species are rare in the ISM, these lines are not absorbed even for moderate hydrogen column densities. Linsky et al (2013, 2014) observed nearby stars and constructed empirical relationships between the various components of stellar chromospheric emission. Using this, one can take the C IV and Si IV line fluxes and infer the intrinsic fluxes of the remainder of the chromospheric emission. Thus for WASP-13, Fossati et al (2015) were able to derive the intrinsic stellar EUV flux, and subsequently model the upper atmosphere of WASP-13b, deriving a mass-loss rate of 1.5 ×1011 g s-1. A good signal to noise spectrum of WASP-12 in the 1100- 2500 Å wavelength region will require a substantial investment of time on HST or a successor UV space telescope. Given the prodigious recent and ongoing modelling activity, this could be a proportionate and appropriate investment with widespread implications. Optical light curves measuring the transits of WASP-12b are much easier to obtain. Even relatively small telescopes can determine transit timings to useful precision. Maciejewski et al (2016) and Collins et al (2017) analyse optical transit timings, using 31 (23) transit lightcurves spanning Nov 2012 – Feb 2016 (Nov 2009 – Feb 2015) respectively. Both analyses incorporate additional orbital constraints from radial velocity (RV) measurements and secondary eclipse timings, with the analysis of Maciejewski et al (2016) allowing a finite eccentricity in their fit while Collins et al (2017) fix the eccentricity to zero. Collins et al (2017) conclude that the transit timings are consistent with a linear ephemeris, while Maciejewski et al (2016) present evidence for deviations. Maciejewski et al (2016) fit two models: a quadratic ephemeris consistent with a simple tidal decay, and a 3300d periodic signal attributed to the periastron precession of a slightly eccentric orbit with e=0.00110± 0.00036. Data from winter 2016/17 should distinguish between these two models. Bonomo et al (2017) used transit timings, secondary eclipse timings, all suitable RVs from the literature published up to 1 January 2016 and 15 unpublished HARPS-N RV points taken before February 2015 to perform an Bayesian determination of WASP-12b's orbital parameters, finding e < 0.020 (1σ upper limit). Thus, the published data is consistent with a circular orbit for WASP-12b. Knowledge of the current orbital configuration is a vital ingredient to determine the tidal effects on the planet which in turn strongly affect the internal heating and mass loss rate, as dramatically illustrated by Li et al (2010)'s work which assumed a much larger eccentricity. The present orbital configuration can also potentially rule out entire classes of evolutionary scenarios. This in turn has potentially profound implications for the planet structure resulting from the mass loss history, and consequently on the present evolution of the planet radius in response to mass loss. See Valsecchi et al (2015) for modelling work which encapsulates such considerations. Further high quality radial velocity measurements covering the phases of the WASP-12b transit should allow the stellar spin to be better constrained. The existing SOPHIE 9 observations and analysis (Husnoo et al 2011, Albrecht et al 2012 and Collins et al 2017) show scattered residuals with deviations from the fit comparable in amplitude to the Rossiter McLaughlin effect itself. The superior precision and stability of HARPS-N should allow for a much more precise determination of the projected stellar spin-orbit angle. This information can be used to perform calculations of the tidal transfer of angular meomentum from the orbit to the stellar spin, using techniques similar to those of Valsecchi et al (2015). Testing the Pollution Hypothesis In the currently accepted interpretation of the evidence we have discussed for the WASP-12 system, some fraction of the mass lost from WASP-12b is dispersed outwards, and is probably carrying angular momentum. In the terminology of Frank et al (2002) and Valsecchi et al (2015) this is an example of non-conservative mass transfer. A simple analysis of mass transfer in the Roche geometry reveals that the minimum energy configuration which satisfies the conservation laws is to move a small amount of mass to very large distances. This mass carries the angular momentum away and allows the bulk of the remaining mass to settle into the deepest part of the Roche potential. If this captures the fate of the gas lost from WASP-12b, then the bulk of the material may have accreted onto the star. Fossati et al (2010b) performed a detailed analysis to examine the element by element photospheric abundances of WASP-12 for signs of accretion of material from the planet. Some hints of this atmospheric pollution were found, but a more detailed differential analysis comparing WASP-12 to stellar twins is required for a definitive answer. This would be analogous to the differential abundance analyses of Melendez et al (2009) on solar twins and Nickson (2015) on 61 Virginis and closely matched comparison stars. Implications for exoplanet demographics The historical collection of biological specimens led to an appreciation of the relationships between various species, and ultimately to our understanding of evolution and the expression of genetic characteristics encoded in DNA. Similarly, the purpose behind this exoplanets fauna is to illuminate the relationships between the Galaxy's planetary systems, using well-studied exemplars to reveal the long-timescale evolutionary processes at work. WASP-12b is a useful exemplar of a giant planet suffering high insolation as a result of a very short orbital period around a hot (F-type) host star. It provides an interesting and informative test-case for the mechanisms leading to one of the most prominent features of the emerging demographic information about the Galaxy's population of planets. The Sub-Jovian Desert When only 106 transiting exoplanets were known, Szabó & Kiss (2011) identified a very prominent feature in the distribution of planet radii with orbital period. There is a distinct lack of planets with radii between about 2 R⊕ and 1RJ for orbital periods shorter than about 10 2.5 days. This feature has subsequently been called the Neptunian desert or the sub-Jovian desert by various authors. As more transiting planets were discovered the feature persisted, as seen, e.g., in Figure 4 of Mazeh et al (2016) showing the RP vs P distribution for almost 4500 transiting planets and candidate planets from Kepler. With the addition of thousands more objects, there are a few within the sub-Jovian desert in the (RP, P) plane. In contrast the (MP, P) plane shown in Figure 1 of Mazeh et al (2016) includes only the best-studied 1037 transiting planets. In this Figure the sub-Jovian desert is remarkably well-defined. The sub-Jovian desert cannot be attributed to selection biases: short period planets are favoured by both the radial velocity and the transit detection methods. The former favours massive planets, while the latter favours large planets, and with both methods planets of low mass and / or small radius have been detected below the desert. See, e.g., Haswell (2010) for a discussion of these selection biases. Mazeh et al (2016) perform a statistical analysis of subsets of the populations they consider, allowing them to derive algebraic forms for the sharply defined upper boundary and the less distinct lower boundary. They find and 𝑀𝑃 𝑀𝐽 𝑅𝑃 𝑅𝐽 ≅ (1.7 ± 0.2) ( 𝑃 −1.14±0.14 ) 𝑑𝑎𝑦 ≅ (1.4 ± 0.3) ( 𝑃 0.31±0.12 ) 𝑑𝑎𝑦 for the upper boundary. WASP-12b itself was considered in the subset contributing to the derivation of the boundary in the (MP, P) plane, but not in the (RP, P) plane where it lay below the period range used. We can use the well-determined orbital period of WASP-12b to calculate the values of mass and radius predicted for a planet of this period which lies on the boundary of the sub-Jovian desert. Comparing these values with the less-precisely- determined empirical mass and radius for WASP-12b (see the introduction) we find that within the uncertainties, WASP-12b lies on both these boundaries, though it lies about 1σ on the low-mass, large radius side of the boundaries. Given that we see WASP-12b is currently losing mass, this is intriguing though inconclusive. Models to explain the sub-Jovian Desert There have been a number of mechanisms proposed to explain the observed sub-Jovian desert. The root cause(s) are not yet agreed, and it is possible that multiple mechanisms contribute to the explanation. Since WASP-12b lies at or near the well-defined upper boundary, we will focus predominantly on the explanations for this feature. Mass loss due to the prodigious insolation suffered by short orbital period planets is an obvious candidate mechanism. Szabó & Kiss (2011) include this as the first of four possible hypotheses to explain their findings, in particular for planets with loosely gravitationally bound atmospheres. Indeed the correlation between surface gravity and orbital period found by Southworth et al (2007) and Southworth (2008) is in fact the first discovery of the upper 11 boundary of the sub-Jovian desert. Within the framework of planetary migration, Mazeh et al (2016) mention the possibility that the upper boundary acts as a death line: planets which migrate to shorter orbital period and cross this line lose the majority of their mass as a result of irradiation or Roche lobe- overflow. Upon crossing the death line, planets would move rapidly downwards in the (MP, P) and (RP, P) planes. An alternative possibility sketched by Mazeh et al (2016) within the migration framework instead invokes a correlation between protoplanetary disk mass and planet mass. The disk pushes the planet inwards until the disk density diminishes below that required. More massive protoplanetary discs might persist to longer times and / or smaller distances from the star, thus growing more massive planets and pushing them further inwards. Matsakos and Königl (2016) explain both the upper and lower boundaries simultaneously by considering the fate of planets which arrive at short orbital periods via eccentric orbits and subsequent circularisation. Planets can acquire an eccentric orbit with a small pericentre either via planet-planet scattering or more gradual processes such as Kozai- Lidov migration. If the pericentre of the eccentric orbit is less than the Roche limit 𝑎𝑅, the simplest form of which is 𝑎𝑅 = 𝑅𝑃 ( 1 3 ) 2𝑀∗ 𝑀𝑃 the planet will be tidally disrupted and will not survive to be subsequently discovered in a circular orbit. Consequently there is a minimum orbital radius after circularisation which depends on the planet's Roche limit. Since the Roche limit depends on the planet's mass and radius, this leads to different orbital criteria for surviving giant and terrestrial planets. Matsakos and Königl (2016) elegantly show that these criteria neatly lead to the observed upper and lower boundaries for the sub-Jovian desert. Most recently Ginzburg and Sari (2017) treat the Roche lobe overflow of hot Jupiters analytically, and conclude that the sub-Jovian desert is a consequence of core masses > 6 M⊕ for the Galaxy's population of hot Jupiters. WASP-12b confronts the models To explain WASP-12b within Matsakos and Königl (2016)'s scenario, we need a precursor phase in which the planet acquired a high eccentricity low pericentre orbit. Since WASP-12 is the primary star of a hierarchical triple star system (Bechter et al 2014) this can naturally be explained by the secular dynamical evolution. Hamers and Lai (2017) present a simplified semi-analytic model of this evolution, concluding that extremely high eccentricities can be generated in the (WASP-12b) planetary orbit in this scenario. Note that the alternative planet-planet scattering route to a high eccentricity orbit for WASP-12b could be problematic because planet-planet scattering events are expected for only the first <108 years, at least ten times less than the age of WASP-12. 12 Kurokawa and Nakamoto (2014) consider the effects of XUV-driven atmospheric escape and Roche-lobe overflow on the exoplanet population. Their model assumes an insolation appropriate to a G type host star and WASP-12b rests comfortably above their minimum survival mass line for a planet with a 10M⊕ core. Clearly WASP-12b is losing mass, which can be reconciled with this model if the (unknown) XUV radiation flux on the planet exceeds that assumed and / or WASP-12b's mass loss rate is low enough that the planet will persist at essentially the same mass. Currently, as we have seen, the mass loss rate for WASP-12b is non-zero, but beyond that is very poorly constrained. Conclusions WASP-12b is a fascinating planet, and has several extreme properties. It has a short orbital period, suffers very high insolation from its hot (F type) host star, and is among the largest known planets. The planet's large size is probably related to its proximity to the star, through irradiation and its highly filled Roche lobe. The optically opaque planet sits within the Roche lobe, but is surrounded by an exosphere of translucent gas which overfills the Roche lobe and produces line-blanketing absorption in the near-UV. The observed chromospheric emission from the host star WASP-12 is anomalously low: it is an extreme outlier in the distribution of the stellar chromospheric activity indicator log R'HK. We attribute the anomalously depressed stellar chromospheric emission to absorption by a diffuse shroud of circumstellar gas which fills our line of sight, covering the chromospherically active regions of the star at all orbital phases. We surmise that the circumstellar gas shroud originates in mass loss from the planet, via the exosphere. The mass loss rate from WASP-12b is unknown. Establishing a high precision measurement of the orbital eccentricity and monitoring the orbital period evolution over the coming years and decades are needed to predict and confront estimates of the mass loss rate. Observations which can achieve this include radial velocity measurements, transit timings, and secondary eclipse timings. An empirical determination of the ionising EUV flux experienced by WASP-12b is a further vital parameter. The best way to establish this is with a UV spectrum covering the C IV and Si IV features. Meanwhile the various ingredients needed to build computational models of the physical mechanisms underlying mass loss from an extreme planet like WASP-12b exist, but have not yet been fully integrated in a self-consistent way and applied to this case. WASP-12b lies on the upper boundary of the sub-Jovian desert. Its position may be a natural consequence, through secular dynamical evolution, of the planet's status as the lowest mass object in a hierarchical quadruple system. It is unclear whether its current evolution will move it rapidly down in mass and radius through the desert; nor is the current and future orbital period evolution clear. Determination of the mass loss rate from WASP-12b will clarify the evolutionary pathway(s) leading to one of the most prominent demographic features of the Galaxy's population of exoplanets. Acknowledgements CH gratefully acknowledges financial support from STFC under grants ST/L000776/1 and ST/P000584/1, and thanks her many primary literature co-authors for sharing their knowledge, skills and enthusiasm. Special thanks to Joel and Charlotte for their forbearance while this Chapter was written. 13 References Albrecht S, Winn JN, Johnson JA et al (2012) Obliquities of Hot Jupiter Host Stars: Evidence for Tidal Interactions and Primordial Misalignments. ApJ 757:18 Bechter EB, Crepp JR, Ngo H et al (2014) WASP-12b and HAT-P-8b are Members of Triple Star Systems. ApJ 788:2 Bisikalo D, Kaygorodov P, Ionov D et al (2013) Three-dimensional Gas Dynamic Simulation of the Interaction between the Exoplanet WASP-12b and its Host Star. ApJ 764:19 Bochinski JJ, Haswell CA, Marsh TA et al (2015) Direct Evidence for an Evolving Dust Cloud from the Exoplanet KIC 12557548 b. ApJLett 800:L21 Bonomo AS, Desidera S, Benatti S et al (2017) arXiv:1704.00373 Busuttil R (2017) Investigating Exoplanets and Transients Using Small-Aperture Telescopes. PhD Thesis, The Open University Carroll-Nellenback J, Frank A, Liu B et al (2017) Hot planetary winds near a star: dynamics, wind-wind interactions, and observational signatures. MNRAS 466:2458-2473 DOI 10.1093/mnras/stw3307 Collins KA, Kielkopf JF, Stassun, KG (2017) Transit Timing Variation Measurements of WASP-12b and Qatar-1b: No Evidence Of Additional Planets. AJ 153:78–91, DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/78, 1512.00464 Erkaev NV, Kulikov Yu N, Lammer, H et al (2007) Roche lobe effects on the atmospheric loss from 'Hot Jupiters'. A&A 472:329 Figueira P, Oshagh M, Adibekyan VZh et al (2014) Revisiting the correlation between stellar activity and planetary surface gravity, A&A 572, 51 Fossati L, Ayres TR, Haswell CA et al (2013) Absorbing Gas around the WASP-12 Planetary System. ApJLett 766:20 Fossati L, Bagnulo S, Elmasli A et al (2010a) A Detailed Spectropolarimetric Analysis of the Planet-hosting Star WASP-12. ApJ 720:872-886, DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/872 Fossati L, France K, Koskinen T et al (2015) Far-UV Spectroscopy of the Planet-hosting Star WASP-13: High-energy Irradiance, Distance, Age, Planetary Mass-loss Rate, and Circumstellar Environment. ApJ 815:118 Fossati L, Haswell CA, Froning CS et al (2010b) Metals in the Exosphere of the Highly Irradiated Planet WASP-12b. ApJLett 714:222-227, DOI 10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L222 Fossati L, Ingrassia S & Lanza AF (2015) A Bimodal Correlation between Host Star Chromospheric Emission and the Surface Gravity of Hot Jupiters. ApJLett 812, 35 Frank J, King A, Raine DJ (2002) Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition ISBN 0521620538. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press Ginzburg, S Sari R (2017) Hot-Jupiter core mass from Roche lobe overflow MNRAS468:278-285 Hamers AS, Lai D (2017) Secular chaotic dynamics in hierarchical quadruple systems, with applications to hot Jupiters in stellar binaries and triples. MNRAS in press. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1319 Hartman JJ (2010) A Correlation Between Stellar Activity and the Surface Gravity of Hot Jupiters. ApJ 717 L138 Haswell CA (2010) Transiting Exoplanets. CUP Cambridge ISBN: 9780521139380 Haswell CA, Fossati L, Ayres T et al (2012) Near-ultraviolet Absorption, Chromospheric Activity, and Star- Planet Interactions in the WASP-12 system. ApJ 760:A79, DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/79 Hebb L et al (2009) WASP-12b: The Hottest Transiting Extrasolar Planet Yet Discovered ApJ 693:1920, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1920 Husnoo N, Pont F, Hébrard G et al (2011) Orbital eccentricity of WASP-12 and WASP-14 from new radial velocity monitoring with SOPHIE. MNRAS 413:2500 Jackson B, Arras P, Penev K et al (2017) A New Model of Roche Lobe Overflow for Short-period Gaseous Planets and Binary Stars. ApJ 835:145 Knutson HA, Howard AW, Isaacson, H (2010) A Correlation Between Stellar Activity and Hot Jupiter Emission Spectra ApJ 720:1569 Kurokawa H, Nakamoto T (2014) Mass-loss Evolution of Close-in Exoplanets: Evaporation of Hot Jupiters and the Effect on Population ApJ 783:54 Lai D, Helling Ch, van den Heuvel EPJ (2010) Mass Transfer, Transiting Stream, and Magnetopause in Close-in Exoplanetary Systems with Applications to WASP-12. ApJLett 721:L923 Lammer H, Selsis F, Ribas, I et al (2003) Atmospheric Loss of Exoplanets Resulting from Stellar X-Ray and 14 Extreme-Ultraviolet Heating. ApJLett 598:L121 Li S-L, Miller N, Lin DNC, Fortney JJ (2010) WASP-12b as a prolate, inflated and disrupting planet from tidal dissipation Nature 463:1054 Linsky JL, France K, Ayres T (2013) Computing Intrinsic LYα Fluxes of F5 V to M5 V Stars. ApJ 766:69 Linsky JL, France K, Ayres T (2014) The Intrinsic Extreme Ultraviolet Fluxes of F5 V TO M5 V Stars. ApJ 780:61 Maciejewski G, Dimitrov D, Fernández M et al (2016) Departure from the constant-period ephemeris for the transiting exoplanet WASP-12. A&A 588:L6 Mandell AM, Haynes K, Sinukoff E et al (2013) Exoplanet Transit Spectroscopy Using WFC3: WASP-12 b, WASP-17 b, and WASP-19 b. ApJ 779:128 Matsakos T, Königl A (2016) On the Origin of the Sub-Jovian Desert in the Orbital-period-Planetary-mass Plane ApJLett 820:L8 Mazeh T, Holczer T, Faigler S (2016) Dearth of short-period Neptunian exoplanets: A desert in period-mass and period-radius planes A&A 589:75 Mayor M, Queloz D (1995) A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star. Nature 378:355-359, DOI 10.1038/378355a0 Meléndez J, Asplund M, Gustafsson B, Yong D (2009) The Peculiar Solar Composition and Its Possible Relation to Planet Formation. ApJLett 704:L66 Nichols JD; Wynn GA; Goad M, et al (2015) Hubble Space Telescope Observations of the NUV Transit of WASP-12b. ApJ 890:133 Nickson, E (2015) Galactic chemical evolution signatures in stellar atmospheres and their possible planetary connection. PhD Thesis, The Open University Noyes RW, Hartmann LW, Baliunas SL, et al (1984) Rotation, convection, and magnetic activity in lower main-sequence stars. ApJ 279:763 Rappaport S, Levine A, Chiang E et al (2012) Possible Disintegrating Short-period Super-Mercury Orbiting KIC 12557548. ApJ 752:1 DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/1 Sanz-Forcada J, Ribas I, Micela G et al (2010) A scenario of planet erosion by coronal radiation. A&A 511 L8 Schröder K-P, Mittag M, Pérez Martínez MI, et al (2012) Basal chromospheric flux and Maunder Minimum- type stars: the quiet-Sun chromosphere as a universal phenomenon. A&A 540:130 Southworth J, Wheatley PJ, Sams G (2007) A method for the direct determination of the surface gravities of transiting extrasolar planets. MNRAS 379:L11 Southworth J (2008) Homogeneous studies of transiting extrasolar planets - I. Light-curve analyses. MNRAS 386:1644 Staab D, Haswell CA, Smith GD et al (2017) SALT observations of the chromospheric activity of transiting planet hosts: mass-loss and star-planet interactions. MNRAS 466:738 DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3172 Swain M, Deroo P, Tinetti G et al (2013) Probing the extreme planetary atmosphere of WASP-12b. Icarus 255:432, DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.04.003 Szabó Gy M, Kiss LL (2011) A Short-period Censor of Sub-Jupiter Mass Exoplanets with Low Density ApJ 727:44 Tripathi A, Kratter KM, Murray-Clay RA et al (2015) Simulated Photoevaporative Mass Loss from Hot Jupiters in 3D. ApJ 808:173 Valsecchi F, Rappaport S, Rasio FA et al (2015) Tidally-driven Roche-lobe Overflow of Hot Jupiters with MESA. ApJ 813:101 Valsecchi F, Rasio FA, Steffen JH (2014) From Hot Jupiters to Super-Earths via Roche Lobe Overflow. ApJLett 793:L3 Vidal-Madjar A, Lecavelier des Etangs A, Désert J.-M. et al (2003) An extended upper atmosphere around the extrasolar planet HD209458b. Nature 422:143-146, DOI 10.1038/nature01448 15
1802.00460	2	1802	2018-04-30T21:04:26	OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator: Statistical Testing of Dynamical Models Against the Real Kuiper Belt	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	All surveys include observational biases, which makes it impossible to directly compare properties of discovered trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) with dynamical models. However, by carefully keeping track of survey pointings on the sky, detection limits, tracking fractions, and rate cuts, the biases from a survey can be modelled in Survey Simulator software. A Survey Simulator takes an intrinsic orbital model (from, for example, the output of a dynamical Kuiper belt emplacement simulation) and applies the survey biases, so that the biased simulated objects can be directly compared with real discoveries. This methodology has been used with great success in the Outer Solar System Origins Survey (OSSOS) and its predecessor surveys. In this chapter, we give four examples of ways to use the OSSOS Survey Simulator to gain knowledge about the true structure of the Kuiper Belt. We demonstrate how to statistically compare different dynamical model outputs with real TNO discoveries, how to quantify detection biases within a TNO population, how to measure intrinsic population sizes, and how to use upper limits from non-detections. We hope this will provide a framework for dynamical modellers to statistically test the validity of their models.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version September 17, 2018 Typeset using LATEX preprint style in AASTeX62 8 1 0 2 r p A 0 3 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 0 6 4 0 0 . 2 0 8 1 : v i X r a OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator: Statistical Testing of Dynamical Models Against the Real Kuiper Belt S. M. Lawler,1 JJ. Kavelaars,1, 2 M. Alexandersen,3 M. T. Bannister,4 B. Gladman,5 J.-M. Petit,6 and C. Shankman2, 1, 7 1NRC-Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics, National Research Council of Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada 3Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 4Astrophysics Research Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 6Institut UTINAM, UMR 6213 CNRS-Universit´e de Franche Comt´e, Besan¸con, France 7current affiliation: City of Toronto, ON, Canada ABSTRACT All surveys include observational biases, which makes it impossible to directly com- pare properties of discovered trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) with dynamical models. However, by carefully keeping track of survey pointings on the sky, detection limits, tracking fractions, and rate cuts, the biases from a survey can be modelled in Survey Simulator software. A Survey Simulator takes an intrinsic orbital model (from, for example, the output of a dynamical Kuiper belt emplacement simulation) and applies the survey biases, so that the biased simulated objects can be directly compared with real discoveries. This methodology has been used with great success in the Outer Solar System Origins Survey (OSSOS) and its predecessor surveys. In this chapter, we give four examples of ways to use the OSSOS Survey Simulator to gain knowledge about the true structure of the Kuiper Belt. We demonstrate how to statistically compare different dynamical model outputs with real TNO discoveries, how to quantify detection biases within a TNO population, how to measure intrinsic population sizes, and how to use upper limits from non-detections. We hope this will provide a framework for dynamical modellers to statistically test the validity of their models. 1. INTRODUCTION The orbital structure, size frequency distribution and total mass of the trans-Neptunian region of the Solar System is an enigmatic puzzle. Fernandez (1980) described an expected distribution for this region based on the mechanisms for the delivery of cometary material into the inner Solar System. Even before the first Kuiper belt object after Pluto was discovered, (1992 QB1; Jewitt & Luu 1993, 1995), it was theorized that dynamical effects produced by the mass contained in this region could in principle be detectable (Hamid et al. 1968). The first discoveries made it clear that extracting Corresponding author: S. M. Lawler [email protected] 2 Lawler et al. precise measurements of the orbital and mass distributions from this zone of the Solar System would require careful analysis. Major puzzles in the Solar System's history can be explored if one has accurate knowledge of the distribution of material in this zone. Examples include: the orbital evolution of Neptune (e.g. Malhotra 1993), the large scale re-ordering of the Solar System (e.g. Thommes et al. 1999; Gomes et al. 2005), the process of planetesimal accretion (e.g. Stern 1996; Davis & Farinella 1997), the production of cometary size objects via collisional processes (e.g. Stern 1995) and their delivery into the inner Solar System (Duncan et al. 1988), and the stellar environment in which the Sun formed (e.g. Brunini & Fernandez 1996; Kobayashi & Ida 2001). Our goal as observers is to test these models and their consequences by comparison to the Solar System as we see it today. Given the sparse nature of the datasets and the challenges of detecting and tracking trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), a strong statistical framework is required if we are to distinguish between these various models. The presence of large-scale biases in the detected sample of TNOs has been apparent since the initial discoveries in the Kuiper belt, and multiple approaches have been used to account for these biases. Jewitt & Luu (1995) use Monte-Carlo comparisons of Kuiper belt models to their detected sample to estimate the total size of the Kuiper belt, taking into account the flux limits of their survey. Similarly Irwin et al. (1995) estimate the flux limits of their searches and use these to weight their detections and, combining those with the results reported in Jewitt & Luu (1995), provide an estimate of the luminosity function of the region. Gladman et al. (1998) provide a Bayesian-based analysis of their detected sample, combined with previously published surveys, to further refine the measurement of the luminosity function of the Kuiper belt. Trujillo et al. (2001) determined the size, inclination and radial distributions of the Kuiper belt by weighting the distribution of observed TNOs based on their detectability and the fraction of the orbits that were contained within the survey fields. Bernstein et al. (2004) refined the maximum-likelihood approach when they extended the measurement of the size distribution to smaller scales and determined statistically significant evidence of a break in the shape of the Kuiper belt luminosity function, later developed further by the deeper survey of Fraser & Kavelaars (2009). A similar approach is taken in Adams (2010) who make estimates of the underlying sampling by inverting the observed distributions. Other recent results for Kuiper belt subpopulations include Schwamb et al. (2009), who use Monte Carlo sampling to estimate detectability of Sedna-like orbits, and Parker (2015), who uses an approximate Bayesian computation approach to account for unknown observation biases in the Neptune Trojans. Each of these methods relies on backing out the underlying distributions from a detected sample. Carefully measuring the true, unbiased structure of the Kuiper belt provides constraints on exactly how Neptune migrated through the Kuiper belt. Two main models of Neptune's migration have been proposed and modelled extensively. Pluto's eccentric, resonant orbit was first explained by a smooth migration model for Neptune (Malhotra 1993, 1995). Larger scale simulations (Hahn & Malhotra 2005) showed this to be a viable way to capture many TNOs into Neptune's mean-motion resonances. The so-called "Nice model" was proposed as an alternate way to destroy the proto-Kuiper belt and capture many TNOs into resonances (Levison et al. 2008). In this model, the giant planets undergo a dynamical instability that causes Neptune to be chaotically scattered onto an eccentric orbit that damps to its current near-circular orbit while scattering TNOs and capturing some into its wide resonances (Tsiganis et al. 2005). Due to the chaotic nature of this model, reproducing simulations OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator 3 is difficult and many variations on the Nice model exist (e.g. Batygin et al. 2012; Nesvorn´y et al. 2013). One very recent and promising variation on the Nice model scenario includes the gravitational effects of fairly large (∼Pluto-sized) bodies that cause Neptune's migration to be "grainy," having small discrete jumps as these larger bodies are scattered (Nesvorn´y & Vokrouhlick´y 2016). More dramatically, even larger planetary-scale objects could have transited and thus perturbed the young Kuiper belt (Petit et al. 1999; Gladman & Chan 2006; Lykawka & Mukai 2008; Silsbee & Tremaine 2017) The level of detail that must be included in Neptune migration scenarios is increasing with the number of discovered TNOs with well-measured orbits; some recent examples of literature com- parisons between detailed dynamical models and TNO orbital distributions are summarized here. Batygin et al. (2011), Dawson & Murray-Clay (2012), and Morbidelli et al. (2014) all use slightly different observational constraints to place limits on the exact eccentricity and migration distance of Neptune's orbit in order to preserve the orbits of cold classical TNOs as observed today. Lawler & Gladman (2013) test the observed distribution of Kozai Plutinos against the output from a smooth Neptune migration model (Hahn & Malhotra 2005) and a Nice model simulation (Levison et al. 2008), finding that neither model produces sufficiently high inclinations. Nesvorn´y (2015a) shows that the timescale of Neptune's migration phase must be fairly slow ((cid:38)10 Myr) in order to replicate the observed TNO inclination distribution, and Nesvorn´y (2015b) shows that including a "jump" in Neptune's semimajor axis evolution can create the "kernel" observed in the cold classical TNOs (first discussed in Petit et al. 2011). Pike et al. (2017) compare the output of a Nice model simulation (Brasser & Morbidelli 2013) with scattering and resonant TNOs, finding that the population ratios are consistent with observations except for the 5:1 resonance, which has far more known TNOs than models would suggest (Pike et al. 2015). Using the observed wide binary TNOs as a constraint on dynamical evolution suggests that this fragile population formed in-situ (Parker & Kavelaars 2010) or was emplaced gently into the cold classical region (Fraser et al. 2017). Regardless of the model involved, using a Survey Simulator is the most accurate and statistically powerful way to make use of model TNO distributions from dynamical simulations such as these to gain constraints on the dynamical history of the Solar System. In this chapter, we discuss what it means for a survey to be "well-characterized" (Section 2) and explain the structure and function of a Survey Simulator (Section 2.1). In Section 3, we then give four explicit examples of how to use a Survey Simulator, with actual dynamical model output and real TNO data. We hope this chapter provides an outline for others to follow. 2. WELL-CHARACTERIZED SURVEYS A well-characterized survey is one in which the survey field pointings, depths, and tracking fractions at different magnitudes and on-sky rates of motion have been carefully measured. The largest well- characterized TNO survey to date is the Outer Solar System Origins Survey (OSSOS; Bannister et al. 2016), which was a large program on the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) carried out over five years, and was specifically planned with the Survey Simulator framework in mind. OSSOS builds on the methodology of three previous well-characterized surveys: the Canada-France Ecliptic Plane Survey (CFEPS; Jones et al. 2006; Kavelaars et al. 2008b; Petit et al. 2011), the CFEPS high-latitude component (Petit et al. 2017), and the survey of Alexandersen et al. (2016). The survey design is discussed extensively in those papers; the OSSOS survey outcomes and parameters in particular are 4 Lawler et al. presented in detail in Bannister et al. (2016) and Bannister et al. (2018). We here summarize the main points that are important for creating a well-characterized survey. These well-characterized surveys are all arranged into observing "blocks:" many individual camera fields tiled together into a continuous block on the sky (the observing blocks for OSSOS are each ∼10 -- 20 square degrees in size). The full observing block is covered during each dark run (when the Moon is closest to new) for the 2 months before, 2 months after, and during the dark run closest to opposition for the observing block. The observing cadence is important for discovering and tracking TNOs, which change position against the background stars on short timescales. The time separation between imaging successive camera fields inside each observing block must be long enough that significant motion against background stars has occurred for TNOs, but not so long that the TNOs have moved too far to be easily recovered by eye or by software. OSSOS used triplets of images for each camera field, taken over the course of two hours. The exposure times are chosen as a careful compromise between photometric depth and limiting trailing1 of these moving sources. The images are searched for moving objects by an automated and robustly tested moving object pipeline (CFEPS and OSSOS used the software pipeline described in Petit et al. 2004), and all TNO candidates discovered by the software are visually inspected. Prior to searching the images, artificial sources (whose flux and image properties closely mimic the real sample) are inserted into the images. The detection of these implanted sources marks the fundamental calibration and characterization of the survey block in photometric depth, detection efficiency, and tracking efficiency. Each observing block has a measured "filling factor" that accounts for the gaps between CCD chips. Detection and tracking efficiencies are measured at different on-sky rates of motion using implanted sources in the survey images, analysed along with the real TNO data. This process is repeated for each observing block, so each block has known magnitude limits, filling factors, on-sky coverage, and detection and tracking efficiencies at different on-sky rates of motion. These are then parameterized and become part of the Survey Simulator. The tracking of the discovered sample provides another opportunity for biases to enter and the process must be closely monitored. A survey done in blocks of fields that are repeated ∼monthly removes the need to make orbit predictions based on only a few hours of arc from a single night's discovery observations. Such short-arc orbit predictions are notoriously imprecise, and dependence on them ensures that assumptions made regarding orbit distribution will find their way into the detected sample as biases. For example, a common assumption for short-arc orbits is a circular orbit. If follow-up observations based on this circular orbital prediction are attempted with only a small area of sky coverage, then those orbits whose Keplerian elements match the input assumptions will be preferentially recovered, while those that do not will be preferentially lost, resulting in a discovery bias against non-circular orbits. Correcting for this type of ephemeris bias is impossible. Several of the large-sample TNO surveys had short arcs on a high fraction of the detections; this introduces unknown tracking biases into the sample that cannot be reproduced in a Survey Simulator because the systematic reasons for object loss (ephemeris bias, Jones et al. 2010) cannot be modeled as random. Repeatedly observing the same block of fields, perhaps with some adjustment for the bulk motion of orbits, helps ensure that ephemeris bias is kept to a minimum. In the OSSOS project we demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach by managing to track essentially all TNOs brighter 1 We note that clever algorithms can be used to obtain accurate photometry from trailed sources (e.g., Fraser et al. 2016). OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator 5 than the flux limits of the discovery sequences (only 2 out of 840 TNOs were not tracked2; Bannister et al. 2018). Schwamb et al. (2010) is an example of a large-scale TNO survey from outside our collaboration that is well-characterized. It has a high tracking fraction and a published pointing history. However, it has a comparatively noisy and low-resolution detection efficiency function, thus we do not include it in our Survey Simulator analysis here. Other large sample size TNO surveys have either unpublished pointings or indications of low tracking fractions leading to unrecoverable ephemeris bias. A well-characterized survey will have flux limits in each observing block from measurements of implanted artificial objects, equal sensitivity to a wide range of orbits, and a known spatial coverage on the sky. A Survey Simulator can now be configured to precisely mimic the observing process for this survey. 2.1. The Basics of a Survey Simulator A Survey Simulator allows models of intrinsic Kuiper Belt distributions to be forward-biased to replicate the biases inherent in a given well-characterized survey. These forward-biased simulated distributions can then be directly compared with real TNO detections, and a statement can be made about whether or not a given model is statistically consistent with the known TNOs. One particular strength of this approach is that the effect of non-detection of certain orbits can be included in the analysis. Methods that rely on the inversion of orbital distributions are, by their design, not sensitive to a particular survey's blind spots. Directly comparing a model with a list of detected TNOs (for example, from the Minor Planet Center database), with a multitude of unknown detection biases, can lead to inaccurate and possibly false conclusions. Using a Survey Simulator avoids this problem completely, with the only downside being that comparisons can only be made using TNOs from well-characterized surveys. Fortunately, the single OSSOS survey contains over 800 TNOs, and the ensemble of well-characterized affiliated surveys contains over 1100 TNOs with extremely precisely measured orbits (Bannister et al. 2018). This is roughly one third of the total number of known TNOs, and one half of the TNOs with orbits that are well-determined enough to perform dynamical classification. At its most basic, a Survey Simulator must produce a list of instantaneous on-sky positions, rates of motion, and apparent magnitudes. These are computed by assigning absolute magnitudes to simulated objects with a given distribution of orbits. These apparent magnitudes, positions, and rates of motion are then evaluated to determine the likelihood of detection by the survey, and a simulated detected distribution of objects is produced. The OSSOS Survey Simulator follows this basic model, but takes into account more realities of survey limitations. It is the result of refinement of this Survey Simulator software through several different well-characterized surveys: initially the CFEPS pre-survey (Jones et al. 2006), then CFEPS (Kavelaars et al. 2008a; Petit et al. 2011), then Alexandersen et al. (2016), and finally OSSOS (Bannister et al. 2016). The OSSOS Survey Simulator software and methodology are now robustly tested, and are presented below. 2.2. The Details of the OSSOS Survey Simulator While the methodology presented here is specific to the OSSOS Survey Simulator, by measuring on sky pointings, magnitude limits and tracking fractions, a Survey Simulator can be built for any 2 The two objects that were not tracked are d <15 AU Centaurs whose high on-sky rates of motion caused them to shear off the fields. The possibility of such shearing loss is accounted for in the Survey Simulator. 6 Lawler et al. survey. The Survey Simulator for the OSSOS ensemble of well-characterized surveys is available as a package3, and the list of observed characteristics of the TNOs discovered in these surveys is published in Bannister et al. (2018). To forward-bias a distribution of objects to allow statistical comparison with the real TNO discoveries in the surveys, the OSSOS Survey Simulator uses the following steps. The instantaneous on-sky position, rate of motion, and apparent magnitude are computed from an orbit, position, and H-magnitude, and can be written to a file that contains the "drawn" simulated objects. This "drawn" file then represents the instantaneous intrinsic distribution of simulated objects. The Survey Simulator evaluates whether each simulated object falls within one of the observing blocks of the survey, and if so, uses the tracking and detection efficiency files for that observing block to calculate whether this object would be detected. If it is detected, the properties of this object are written to a file containing the simulated detections. A very small fraction of on-sky motion rates were detected and not tracked in the real survey (Centaurs sometimes shear off the field due to their high rate of motion), which is accounted for in the Survey Simulator. The simulated objects are written to the simulated tracked object file with probabilities reflecting this. The user must supply the Survey Simulator with a routine that generates an object with orbital elements and an absolute H magnitude. How these are generated is free for the user to decide. The user may edit the source software to include generation of orbits and absolute magnitudes within the Survey Simulator, but it is recommended that a separate script is used in conjunction with the unedited Survey Simulator. The software package comes with a few examples, and details are provided in the following paragraph showing how we on the OSSOS team have implemented the generation of simulated TNOs. The orbital elements of an object can be determined in a variety of ways. The Survey Simulator can choose an orbit and a random position within that orbit, either from a list of orbits (as would be produced by a dynamical model) or from a parametric distribution set by the user. Orbits from a list can also be easily "smeared," that is, variation is allowed within a fraction of the model orbital elements, in order to smooth a distribution or produce additional similar orbits (however, one must be careful that the distribution is dominated by the original list of orbits, and not by the specifics of the smearing procedure). To determine the likely observed magnitude of the source, an absolute H magnitude is assigned to this simulated object, chosen so as to replicate an H-distribution set by the user. Tools and examples are provided to set the H-distribution as a single exponential distribution, to include a knee to a different slope at a given H magnitude (see, for example, Fraser et al. 2014), or to include a divot in the H-distribution (as in Shankman et al. 2016; Lawler et al. 2018) The H-distribution parameter file also sets the maximum and minimum H values that will be simulated. The smallest H-magnitude (i.e. largest diameter) is not as important because it is set by the distribution itself. But the largest H-magnitude (i.e. smallest diameter) is important to match to the population being simulated. If the maximum H-magnitude is smaller than that of the largest magnitude TNO in the observational sample one wants to simulate, then the distribution won't be sensitive to this large H-magnitude tail. If the maximum H value is much larger than that of the largest magnitude TNO in the sample, it is simply a waste of computational resources, since the simulation will include many objects that were too faint to be detected in the survey. This does, 3 https://github.com/OSSOS/SurveySimulator OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator 7 however, expose a strength of the Survey Simulator, as we can learn from these faint detections that a hidden reservoir of small objects might exist. The process of drawing simulated objects and determining if they would have been detected by the given surveys is repeated until the desired number of simulated tracked or detected objects is produced by the Survey Simulator. The desired number of simulated detected objects may be the same as the number of real detected TNOs in a survey in order to measure an intrinsic population size (as demonstrated in Section 3.3), or an upper limit on a non-detection of a particular subpopulation (Section 3.4), or it may be a large number in order to test the rejectability of an underlying theoretical distribution (as demonstrated in Sections 3.1) or to quantify survey biases in a given subpopulation (Section 3.2). 3. EXAMPLES OF SURVEY SIMULATOR APPLICATIONS Here we present four examples of different ways to use the Survey Simulator to gain statistically valuable information about TNO populations. In Section 3.1, we demonstrate how to use the Survey Simulator to forward-bias the output of dynamical simulations and then statistically compare the biased simulation with a distribution of real TNOs. In Section 3.2, we use the Survey Simulator to build a parametric intrinsic distribution and then bias this distribution by our surveys, examining survey biases for a particular TNO subpopulation in detail. The Survey Simulator can also be used to measure the size of the intrinsic population required to produce a given number of detections in a survey; this is demonstrated in Section 3.3. And finally, in Section 3.4, we demonstrate a handy aspect of the Survey Simulator: using non-detections from a survey to set statistical upper limits on TNO subpopulations. We hope that these examples will prove useful for dynamical modellers who want a statistically powerful way to test their models. 3.1. Testing the Output of a Dynamical Model: The Outer Solar System with a Distant Giant Planet or Rogue Planet This example expands on the analysis of Lawler et al. (2017), which presents the results of three different dynamical emplacement simulations of the distant Kuiper Belt. Here we analyze these three dynamical simulations and also an additional emplacement model that includes a "rogue planet" that is ejected early in the Solar System's history (Gladman & Chan 2006). The outputs from these four dynamical TNO emplacement simulations are run through the OSSOS Survey Simulator and compared with the high pericenter TNOs discovered by OSSOS. The four emplacement simulation scenarios analyzed here include the following conditions: 1. The four giant planets and including the effects of Galactic tides and stellar flybys (simulation from Kaib et al. 2011) 2. The four giant planets with an additional 10 Earth mass planet having a = 250 AU and e = 0 (based on a theory proposed in Trujillo & Sheppard 2014), also including the effects of Galactic tides and stellar flybys (simulation from Lawler et al. 2017). 3. The four giant planets with an additional 10 Earth mass planet having a = 500 AU and e = 0.5 (based on a theory proposed in Batygin & Brown 2016), also including the effects of Galactic tides and stellar flybys (simulation from Lawler et al. 2017). 4. The four giant planets and an additional 2 Earth mass rogue planet that started with a = 35 AU and q = 30 AU, which was ejected after ∼200 Myr (simulation from Gladman & Chan 2006). 8 Lawler et al. The papers which have recently proposed the presence of a distant undiscovered massive planet (popularly referred to as "Planet 9"; Trujillo & Sheppard 2014; Batygin & Brown 2016) rely on published detections of large semimajor axis (a), high pericenter distance (q) TNOs, which have extreme biases against detection in flux-limited surveys4. These large-a, high-q TNOs are drawn from different surveys, with unpublished and thus unknown observing biases. The Minor Planet Center (MPC) Database, which provides a repository for TNO detections, does not include information on the pointings or biases of the surveys that detected these TNOs. Sample selection caused by survey depth and sky coverage can be non-intuitive, caused by weather, galactic plane avoidance, and telescope allocation pressure, among other possibilities (Sheppard & Trujillo 2016; Shankman et al. 2017). Thus the assumption can not be made that a collection of TNOs from different surveys will be bias-free. Further, the detected sample of objects in the MPC Database provides no insight into the parts of the sky where a survey may have looked and found nothing, nor to strong variation in flux sensitivity that occurs due to small variations in image quality. Here we demonstrate how to use the results of well-characterized surveys to compare real TNO detections to the output of a dynamical model, comprising a list of orbits. We visualize this output with a set of cumulative distributions. Figure 1 shows cumulative distributions in six different obser- vational parameters: semimajor axis a, inclination i, apparent magnitude in r-band mr, pericenter distance q, distance at detection d, and absolute magnitude in r-band Hr. The outputs from the four emplacement models are shown by different colours in the plot, with the intrinsic distributions shown as dotted lines, and the forward-biased simulated detection distributions as solid lines. These intrinsic distributions have all been cut to only include the pericenter and semimajor axis range pre- dicted by Batygin & Brown (2016) to be most strongly affected by a distant giant planet: q > 37 AU and 50 < a < 500 AU. We cannot directly compare the output from these dynamical simulations covering such a huge range of a and q to real TNOs because the observing biases present in the detected TNO distributions are severe. Using a survey simulator combined with a carefully characterized survey, however, allows us to impose the observing biases onto the simulated sample and determine what the detected simulated sample would have been. We use the OSSOS Survey Simulator and the q > 37 AU, 50 < a < 500 AU TNOs discovered by the OSSOS ensemble in this example (Figure 1). The solid lines in Figure 1 show the forward-biased simulated detections from the Survey Simulator, and the black points show the real TNOs detected in the OSSOS ensemble with the same a and q cut. These can now be directly compared, as the same biases have been applied. The effect of observing biases varies widely among the six parameters plotted, and can be seen by comparing the intrinsic simulated distributions (dotted lines) with the corresponding biased simulated distributions (solid lines) in Figure 1. Unsurprisingly, these surveys are biased toward detecting the smallest-a, lower inclination, and lowest-q TNOs. These models have not been explicitly constructed in an attempt to produce the orbital and magni- tude distribution of the elements in the detection range, so the following exercise is pedagogic rather than attempting to be diagnostic. All these models statistically fail dramatically in producing several of the distributions shown here (discussed in detail later in this section), but how they fail allows one to understand what changes to the model may be required. All the models generically produce 4 Brown (2017) does attempt a numerical simulation to calculate likelihood of detection for different orbital param- eters in the high-q population, but this is backing out the underlying distribution in the underlying sample and still relies on assumptions about the unknown sensitivity and completeness of the surveys. OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator 9 Figure 1. Cumulative distributions of TNOs in six different parameters: semimajor axis a, inclination i, apparent r-band magnitude mr, pericenter distance q, distance at detection d, and absolute magnitude in r-band Hr. The result of four different emplacement models are presented: the known Solar System (orange), the Solar System plus a circular orbit Planet 9 (blue), or plus an eccentric orbit Planet 9 (gray), and a "rogue" planet simulation (purple). The intrinsic model distributions are shown with dotted lines, and the resulting simulated detections in solid lines. Black circles show non-resonant TNOs discovered by the OSSOS ensemble having q > 37 AU and 50 < a < 500 AU. a slight misbalance in both the absolute (lower right panel of Figure 1) and apparent magnitude dis- tributions (upper right panel of Figure 1), with too few bright objects being present in the predicted sample, when using the input Hr-magnitude distribution from Lawler et al. (2018). Changes in the H-magnitude exponents or break points that are comparable to their current uncertainties will be sufficient to produce a greatly improved match, so this comparison is less interesting than for the orbital distributions. The orbital inclination distribution (upper center panel of Figure 1) of the detected sample (black dots) is roughly uniform up to about i = 18◦, it has few members from 18−25◦, and then has the final one third of the sample distributed up to about 40◦. This observed cutoff near 40◦ is strongly affected by survey biases, as evidenced by the dramatic elimination of this large fraction of the intrinsic model population that is present in the two Planet 9 simulations (compare the distribution of dotted and Lawler et al. 10 solid blue and gray lines). In contrast, the relative dearth in the 18− 25◦ range of the observed TNOs is not caused by the survey biases: none of the biased models show this effect. The rogue planet model's intrinsic distribution (dotted purple line) is a relatively good match to the detections up to about i = 15◦; when biased by the Survey Simulator (solid purple line) this model predicts far too cold a distribution. The rogue model used here was from a simulation with a nearly-coplanar initial rogue planet; simulations with an initially inclined extra planet will give higher inclinations for the Kuiper Belt objects and would thus be required in this scenario. The two Planet 9 scenarios shown give better (but still rejectable) comparisons to the detections. The comparison of the models in the semimajor axis distribution gives very clear trends (upper left panel of Figure 1). The rogue planet model (solid purple line) used seriously underpredicts the fraction of large-a TNOs but does produce the abundant a < 70 AU objects in the detected sample (black dots). This is caused by the rogue spending little time in the enormous volume beyond 100 AU and thus being unable to significanly lift perihelia for those semimajor axes. In contrast, the control (solid orange line) and Planet 9 models (solid blue and gray lines) greatly underpredict the a < 100 AU fraction because the distant planet has very little dynamical effect on these relatively tightly-bound orbits; these models predict roughly the correct fraction, ∼20% of objects having a > 100 AU, but the distribution of larger-a TNOs is more extended in reality than these models predict. Lastly, the q > 37 AU perihelion distribution (lower left panel of Figure 1) of the rogue model (solid purple line) is more extended than the real objects, due to this particular rogue efficiently raising the perihelia of the a = 50 − 100 AU populations by a few AU, to a broad distribution. The control model's q distribution (solid orange line) is far too concentrated, while the Planet 9 simulations (solid blue and gray lines) qualitatively provide the match the real TNOs in this distribution. In order to determine whether any of these biased distributions provide a statistically acceptable match to the real TNOs, we use a bootstrapped Anderson-Darling statistic5 (Anderson & Darling 1954), calculated for each of the six distributions. This technique is described in detail in previ- ous literature (e.g. Kavelaars et al. 2009; Petit et al. 2011; Bannister et al. 2016; Shankman et al. 2016), and we summarize below. An Anderson-Darling statistic is calculated for the simulated bi- ased distributions compared with the real TNOs; this statistic is summed over all distributions being tested. The Anderson-Darling statistic is then bootstrapped by drawing a handful of random sim- ulated objects from each simulated distribution, calculating the resulting AD statistics, summing over all distributions, then comparing this to how often the summed AD statistic for the real TNOs occurs (following Parker 2015; Alexandersen et al. 2016). If a summed AD statistic as large as the summed AD statistic for the real TNOs occurs in < 5% of randomly drawn samples, we conclude this simulated distribution is inconsistent with observations and we can reject it at the 95% confidence level. When we calculate the bootstrapped AD statistics for each of the simulated distributions as com- pared with the real TNOs in Figure 1, we find that all four of the tested simulations are inconsistent with the data and we reject all of them at > 99% confidence level. This may be surprising to those unaccustomed to these comparisons. Matches between data and models that are not statisti- cally rejectable have almost no noticeable differences between the data and the biased model in all parameters than are compared (see, e.g., Figure 3 in Gladman et al. 2012). 5 The Anderson-Darling test is similar to the better-known Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, but with higher sensitivity to the tails of the distributions being compared. OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator 11 We note that none of the four dynamical emplacement models analysed here include the effects of Neptune's migration, which is well-known to have an important influence on the structure of the distant Kuiper belt. Recent detailed migration simulations (Kaib & Sheppard 2016; Nesvorn´y et al. 2016; Pike et al. 2017; Pike & Lawler 2017) have shown that temporary resonance capture and Kozai cycling within resonances during Neptune's orbital evolution has important effects on the overall distribution of distant TNOs, particularly in raising pericenters and semimajor axes. Incorporating the effects of Neptune's migration may produce a better fit between the real TNOs and the models shown in Figure 1. We reiterate that the point of this section has been to provide a walk-through of how to compare the output of a dynamical model to real TNO detections in a statistically powerful way. The preceding discussion of the shortcomings of the specific dynamical models presented here highlights that a holistic approach to dynamical simulations of Kuiper belt emplacement is necessary. For example, Nesvorn´y (2015a) uses the CFEPS Survey Simulator and CFEPS-discovered TNOs to constrain a Neptune migration model presented in that work, and Shankman et al. (2016) uses the OSSOS Survey Simulator and TNOs to improve the dynamical emplacement model of Kaib et al. 2011. We hope that use of a Survey Simulator will become standard practice for testing dynamical emplacement models in the future. 3.2. Using a Parametric Population Distribution: Biases in Detection of Resonant TNOs In this section we show how to use the Survey Simulator with a resonant TNO population in order to demonstrate two important and useful points: how to build a simulated population from a parametric distribution, and showing how the Survey Simulator handles longitude biases in non- uniform populations. For this demonstration, we build a toy model of the 2:1 mean motion resonance with Neptune, using a parametric distribution built within the Survey Simulator software (though we note that this parametric distribution could just as easily be created with a separate script and later utilized by the unedited Survey Simulator). The parametric distribution here is roughly based on that used in Gladman et al. (2012), but greatly simplified and not attempting to match the real 2:1 TNO distributions. The Survey Simulator chooses from this parametric distribution with a within ±0.5 AU of the resonance center (47.8 AU), q = 30 AU, i = 0◦,6 and libration amplitudes 0 − 10◦. There are three resonant islands in the 2:1 resonance, and the libration center (cid:104)φ21(cid:105) is chosen to populate these three islands equally in this toy model. For the purposes of our toy model, we define these angles as: leading asymmetric (cid:104)φ21(cid:105) = 80◦, symmetric (cid:104)φ21(cid:105) = 180◦, and trailing asymmetric (cid:104)φ21(cid:105) = 280◦. The resonant angle φ21 in the snapshot is chosen sinusoidally within the libration amplitude. The ascending node Ω and mean anomaly M are chosen randomly, then the argument of pericenter ω is chosen to satisfy the resonant condition φ21 = 2λTNO − λN − TNO, where mean longitude λ = Ω + ω + M, longitude of pericenter = Ω + ω, and the subscripts TNO and N denote the orbital elements of the TNO and Neptune, respectively. The last step is to assign an H magnitude, in this case from a literature TNO H-distribution (Lawler et al. 2018). As each simulated TNO is drawn from this distribution, its magnitude (resulting from its instantaneous distance and H magnitude), on-sky position, and rate of on-sky motion are evaluated by the Survey Simulator to ascertain whether or not this TNO would have been detected by the survey for which configurations are provided to the simulator. 6 The inclinations are actually set to a very small value close to zero to avoid ambiguities in the other orbital angles. 12 Lawler et al. Figure 2. Black points show the positions of TNOs in a snapshot from this parametric toy model of TNOs in the 2:1 mean-motion resonance. The position of Neptune is shown by a blue circle, and dotted circles show distances from the Sun. Red points show simulated detections after running this model through the Survey Simulator. One third of the TNOs are in each libration island in the intrinsic model, but 2/3 of the detections are in the leading asymmetric island (having pericenters in the upper right quadrant of this plot). This bias is simply due to the longitudinal direction of pointings within the OSSOS ensemble and pericenter locations in this toy model of the 2:1 resonance. Figure 2 shows the results of this simulation. Due to the (unrealistically) low libration amplitudes in this toy model simulation, the three resonant islands show up as discrete sets of orbits, with pericenters in three clusters: symmetric librators are opposite Neptune, and leading and trailing are in the upper right and lower left of the plot, respectively7. While the intrinsic distributions in this 7 We note that in reality the symmetric island generally has very large libration amplitudes and the pericenter positions of symmetric librators overlap with each of the asymmetric islands (e.g. Volk et al. 2016), thus diagnosing the membership of each island is not as simple as this toy model makes it appear. OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator 13 model are evenly distributed among the three islands by design (33% in each), the detected TNOs are not. This is because TNOs on eccentric orbits are most likely to be detected close to pericenter, and in this toy model, the pericenters are highly clustered around three distinct positions on the sky.8 The red points in Figure 2 show the simulated TNOs that are detected by the OSSOS Survey Simulator. Just because of the positions of survey pointings on the sky, the detections are highly biased toward the leading island, which has over 2/3 of the detections, with fewer detections in the trailing island, and only 10% of all the detections in the symmetric island. Without knowing the on-sky detection biases (as is the case for TNOs pulled from the MPC database), one could easily (but erroneously) conclude that the leading island is much more populated than the trailing island, when in fact the intrinsic populations are equal. The relative fraction of n:1 TNOs that inhabit different resonant islands has been discussed in the literature as a diagnostic of Neptune's past migration history (Chiang & Jordan 2002; Murray-Clay & Chiang 2005; Pike & Lawler 2017). Past observational studies have relied on n:1 resonators from the MPC database with unknown biases, or the handful of n:1 resonators detected in well-characterized surveys to gain weak (but statistically tested) constraints on the relative populations. Upcoming detailed analysis using the full OSSOS survey and making use of the Survey Simulator will provide stronger constraints on this fraction, without worries about unknown observational biases (Chen, Y.-T., private communication). 3.3. Determining Intrinsic Population Size: The Centaurs The Survey Simulator can easily be used to determine intrinsic population sizes. As described in Section 2.1, the Survey Simulator keeps track of the number of "drawn" simulated objects that are needed for the requested number of simulated tracked objects. By asking the Survey Simulator to produce the same number of tracked simulated objects as were tracked in a given survey, the number of drawn simulated objects is a realization of the intrinsic population required for the survey to have detected the actual number of TNOs that were found by the survey. By repeating this many times, with different random number seeds, different orbits and instantaneous positions are chosen from the model and slightly different numbers of simulated drawn objects are required each time. This allows us to measure the range of intrinsic population sizes needed to produce a given number of tracked, detected TNOs in a survey. Here we measure the intrinsic population required to produce the 17 Centaurs that are detected in the OSSOS ensemble. Once the parameters of the orbital distribution and the H-distribution have been pinned down using the AD statistical analysis outlined in Section 3.1 (this is done in detail for the Centaurs in Lawler et al. 2018), we run the Survey Simulator until it produces 17 tracked Centaurs from the a < 30 AU portion of the Kaib et al. (2011) scattering TNO model, and record the number of simulated drawn objects required. As the OSSOS ensemble discovered Centaurs down to Hr (cid:39) 14, the Survey Simulator is run to this H-magnitude limit. We repeat this 1000 times to find the range of intrinsic population sizes that can produce 17 simulated tracked objects. Using the properties of simulated objects in the drawn file, we measure the intrinsic population size to Hr < 12 (right panel, Figure 3). The median intrinsic population required for 17 detections is 8 While this is obviously an exaggerated example, pericenters in all of the resonant TNO populations are most likely to occur at certain sky positions, and thus this is an important consideration when discussing survey biases (see Gladman et al. 2012; Lawler & Gladman 2013; Volk et al. 2016, for detailed discussions and analysis of these effects for resonant populations). 14 Lawler et al. Figure 3. The range of intrinsic Centaur population sizes required for the Survey Simulator to produce the same number of Centaur detections (17) as were discovered by the OSSOS ensemble, Hr < 8.66 intrinsic populations shown in red (left panel) and Hr < 12 shown in orange (right panel). The solid lines highlight the median population, and dotted lines show the 95% upper and lower confidence limits on the intrinsic Centaur population for each H-magnitude limit. Using the OSSOS ensemble, we measure an intrinsic populations of 130+80−60 Hr < 8.66 Centaurs and 3700+2100−1600 Hr < 12 Centaurs with 95% confidence. 3700, with 97.5% of population estimates falling above 2100, and 97.5% falling below 5800 (these two values bracket 95% of the population estimates). The result is a statistically tested 95% confidence limit on the intrinsic Centaur population of 3700+2100−1600 for Hr < 12. To ease comparison with other statistically produced intrinsic TNO population estimates (e.g. Petit et al. 2011; Gladman et al. 2012), we also measure a population estimate for Hr < 8.66, which corresponds to D (cid:38) 100 km9 (left panel, Figure 3). Even though none of the detected Centaurs in OSSOS had Hr magnitudes this small, this estimate is valid because it is calculated from our Survey Simulator-based population estimate and a measured H-magnitude distribution (from Lawler et al. 2018). For Hr < 8.66, the statistically tested 95% confidence limit on the intrinsic Centaur population is 130+80−60. 3.4. Constraints from Non-Detections: Testing a Theoretical Distant Population Here we show a perhaps unintuitive aspect of the Survey Simulator: non-detections can be just as powerful as detections for constraining Kuiper Belt populations. Non-detections can only be used if the full pointing list from a survey is published along with the detected TNOs. An examination of the orbital distribution of TNOs in the MPC database makes it clear that there is a sharp dropoff in the density of TNO detections at a (cid:38) 50 AU and q (cid:38) 40 AU (Figure 2 in Sheppard & Trujillo 2016, demonstrates this beautifully). Is this the result of observation bias or a real dropoff? Without 9 The approximate Hr magnitude that corresponds to D of 100 km is calculated assuming an albedo of 0.04 and using an average plutino colour g − r = 0.5 (Alexandersen et al. 2016). OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator 15 carefully accounting for survey biases (Allen et al. 2001, 2002), by using the MPC database alone, there is no way to know. Figure 4. Coloured points show the relative populations and semimajor axis-eccentricity distributions from the CFEPS L7 model of the Kuiper belt, where absolute population estimates have been produced for each subpopulation in the well-characterized CFEPS survey (Petit et al. 2011; Gladman et al. 2012), populations are scaled to Hg < 8.5 and colour-coded by dynamical class. Resonances included in this model (those with >1 TNO detected by CFEPS) are labelled. A low-e artificial test population has been injected at 60 AU (black points); the number of points shows the upper limit on this population determined by zero detections in OSSOS, extrapolated to match the CFEPS model (Hr < 8). Randomly drawing zero objects when you expect three has a probability of 5%, assuming Poisson statistics; thus, the simulated population required to produce three detections is the 95% confidence upper limit for a population that produced zero detections. As our example for non-detection upper limits, we create an artificial population in the distant, low-eccentricity Kuiper belt, where OSSOS has zero detections. Figure 4 shows the CFEPS L7 debiased Kuiper belt10 (Petit et al. 2011; Gladman et al. 2012), where this low-eccentricity artificial population has been inserted at 60 AU (small black points) to demonstrate the power of non-detections, even in parameter space with low sensitivity 10 Model available at www.cfeps.net 16 Lawler et al. (i.e., low-e TNOs at 60 AU will never come very close to the Sun, thus will always remain faint and difficult to detect). We run this artificial population through the Survey Simulator until we have three detections in order to measure a 95% confidence upper limit on this population. At this large distance, we are only sensitive to relatively large TNOs (Hr (cid:46) 7, corresponding to D (cid:38) 180 km for an albedo of 0.04). For there to be an expectation to detect three objects in the survey fields, the Survey Simulator tells us that there would need to exist a population of ∼90 such objects, which is our upper limit on this population. Extrapolating this population to match the H magnitude limits of the CFEPS L7 subpopulations plotted in Figure 4, the total number of which are scaled appropriately for Hg < 8.5, gives ∼700 objects in this artificial population with Hr < 8. This is a very small population size. We note that this specific analysis is only applicable to dynamically cold TNOs of relatively large size (Hr < 7). A steep size distribution could allow many smaller TNOs to remain undiscovered on similar orbits. The point of this exercise it to show statistically tested constraints on populations with no survey detections. For comparison, at this absolute magnitude limit (Hr < 7), the scattering disk is estimated to have an intrinsic population of ∼4000 (Lawler et al. 2018), the plutinos are estimated to have an intrinsic population of ∼500 (Volk et al. 2016), and the detached TNOs are estimated to number ∼4000 (Petit et al. 2011). Using the estimated populations and size distribution slopes from Petit et al. (2011) gives 3000 Hr < 7 TNOs in the classical belt. The 3:1 mean-motion resonance, which is located at a similar semimajor axis (a = 62.6 AU), is estimated to have an Hr < 7 population of ∼200 (Gladman et al. 2012). The 3:1 TNOs, however, are much more easily detected in a survey due to their higher eccentricities as compared with our artificial 60 AU population, thus a given survey would be sensitive to a larger H-magnitude for the 3:1 population than the 60 AU cold test population. This statistically tested population limit essentially shows that not very many low eccentricity, distant TNOs can be hiding from the OSSOS survey ensemble, especially when compared with other TNO populations. 4. CONCLUSION Using TNO discoveries from well-characterized surveys and only analysing the goodness of fit between models and TNO discoveries after forward-biasing the models gives a statistically powerful framework within which to validate dynamical models of Kuiper belt formation. Understanding the effects that various aspects of Neptune's migration have on the detailed structure of the Kuiper belt not only provides constraints on the formation of Neptune and Kuiper belt planetesimals, but also provides useful comparison to extrasolar planetesimal belts (Matthews & Kavelaars 2016). There are, of course, many lingering mysteries about the structure of the Kuiper belt, some of which may be solved by detailed dynamical simulations in combination with new TNO discoveries in the near future. One such mystery is explaining the very large inclinations in the scattering disk (Shankman et al. 2016; Lawler et al. 2018) and inside mean-motion resonances (Gladman et al. 2012). Some possible dynamical mechanisms to raise inclinations include rogue planets/large mass TNOs (Gladman & Chan 2006; Silsbee & Tremaine 2017), interactions with a distant massive planet (Gomes et al. 2015; Lawler et al. 2017), and diffusion from the Oort cloud (Kaib et al. 2009; Brasser et al. 2012). These theories may also be related to the recent discovery that the mean plane of the distant Kuiper belt is warped (Volk & Malhotra 2017). Explaining the population of high pericenter TNOs (Sheppard & Trujillo 2016; Shankman et al. 2017) is also difficult with current Neptune migration models. Theories to emplace high pericenter OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator 17 TNOs include dynamical diffusion (Bannister et al. 2017), dropouts from mean-motion resonances during grainy Neptune migration (Kaib & Sheppard 2016; Nesvorn´y et al. 2016), dropouts from mean- motion resonances during Neptune's orbital circularization phase (Pike & Lawler 2017), interactions with a distant giant planet (Gomes et al. 2015; Batygin & Brown 2016; Lawler et al. 2017), a stellar flyby (Morbidelli & Levison 2004), capture from a passing star (J´ılkov´a et al. 2015), and perturbations in the Solar birth cluster (Brasser & Schwamb 2015). Here we have highlighted only a small number of the inconsistencies between models and real TNO orbital data. The level of detail that must be included in Neptune migration simulations has increased dramatically with the release of the full OSSOS dataset, containing hundreds of TNOs with the most precise orbits ever measured. The use of the Survey Simulator will be vital for testing future highly detailed dynamical emplacement simulations, and for solving the lingering mysteries in the observed structure of the Kuiper belt. SML gratefully acknowledges support from the NRC-Canada Plaskett Fellowship. MTB is sup- ported by UK STFC grant ST/L000709/1. The authors acknowledge the sacred nature of Maunakea, and appreciate the opportunity to observe from the mountain. CFHT is operated by the National Research Council (NRC) of Canada, the Institute National des Sciences de l'Universe of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) of France, and the University of Hawaii, with OSSOS receiving additional access due to contributions from the Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan. Data are produced and hosted at the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre; processing and analysis were performed using computing and storage capacity provided by the Canadian Advanced Network For Astronomy Research (CANFAR). REFERENCES Adams, F. C. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 47, Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. 2016, AJ, 151, 22, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130830 doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22 Alexandersen, M., Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J. J., Batygin, K., Brown, M. E., & Betts, H. 2012, et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 111, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/5/111 Allen, R. L., Bernstein, G. M., & Malhotra, R. 2001, ApJL, 549, L241, doi: 10.1086/319165 -- . 2002, AJ, 124, 2949, doi: 10.1086/343773 Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. 1954, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 765, doi: 10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232 Bannister, M. T., Kavelaars, J. J., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 70, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/3/70 Bannister, M. T., Shankman, C., Volk, K., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 262, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6db5 Bannister, M. T., Gladman, B. J., Kavelaars, J. J., et al. 2018, AJ, 152, 70, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/3/70 ApJL, 744, L3, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/744/1/L3 Batygin, K., Brown, M. E., & Fraser, W. C. 2011, ApJ, 738, 13, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/13 Bernstein, G. M., Trilling, D. E., Allen, R. L., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1364, doi: 10.1086/422919 Brasser, R., Duncan, M. J., Levison, H. F., Schwamb, M. E., & Brown, M. E. 2012, Icarus, 217, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.10.012 Brasser, R., & Morbidelli, A. 2013, Icarus, 225, 40, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.03.012 Brasser, R., & Schwamb, M. E. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 3788, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2374 Brown, M. E. 2017, AJ, 154, 65, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa79f4 Brunini, A., & Fernandez, J. A. 1996, A&A, 308, 988 18 Lawler et al. Chiang, E. I., & Jordan, A. B. 2002, AJ, 124, Jones, R. L., Gladman, B., Petit, J.-M., et al. 3430, doi: 10.1086/344605 Davis, D. R., & Farinella, P. 1997, Icarus, 125, 50, doi: 10.1006/icar.1996.5595 2006, Icarus, 185, 508, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.07.024 Kaib, N. A., Roskar, R., & Quinn, T. 2011, Icarus, Dawson, R. I., & Murray-Clay, R. 2012, ApJ, 750, 215, 491, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.07.037 43, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/43 Duncan, M., Quinn, T., & Tremaine, S. 1988, ApJL, 328, L69, doi: 10.1086/185162 Fernandez, J. A. 1980, MNRAS, 192, 481, doi: 10.1093/mnras/192.3.481 Fraser, W., Alexandersen, M., Schwamb, M. E., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 158, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/6/158 Fraser, W. C., Brown, M. E., Morbidelli, A., Parker, A., & Batygin, K. 2014, ApJ, 782, 100, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/100 Fraser, W. C., & Kavelaars, J. J. 2009, AJ, 137, 72, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/1/72 Fraser, W. C., Bannister, M. T., Pike, R. E., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0088, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0088 Gladman, B., & Chan, C. 2006, ApJL, 643, L135, doi: 10.1086/505214 Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J. J., Nicholson, P. D., Loredo, T. J., & Burns, J. A. 1998, AJ, 116, 2042, doi: 10.1086/300573 Gladman, B., Lawler, S. M., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 23, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/23 Gomes, R., Levison, H. F., Tsiganis, K., & Morbidelli, A. 2005, Nature, 435, 466, doi: 10.1038/nature03676 Gomes, R. S., Soares, J. S., & Brasser, R. 2015, Icarus, 258, 37, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.06.020 Hahn, J. M., & Malhotra, R. 2005, AJ, 130, 2392, doi: 10.1086/452638 Hamid, S. E., Marsden, B. G., & Whipple, F. L. 1968, AJ, 73, 727, doi: 10.1086/110685 Irwin, M., Tremaine, S., & Zytkow, A. N. 1995, AJ, 110, 3082, doi: 10.1086/117749 Jewitt, D., & Luu, J. 1993, Nature, 362, 730, doi: 10.1038/362730a0 Jewitt, D. C., & Luu, J. X. 1995, AJ, 109, 1867, doi: 10.1086/117413 J´ılkov´a, L., Portegies Zwart, S., Pijloo, T., & Hammer, M. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 3157, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1803 Jones, R. L., Parker, J. W., Bieryla, A., et al. 2010, AJ, 139, 2249, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2249 Kaib, N. A., & Sheppard, S. S. 2016, AJ, 152, 133, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/5/133 Kaib, N. A., Becker, A. C., Jones, R. L., et al. 2009, ApJ, 695, 268, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/268 Kavelaars, J., Jones, L., Gladman, B., Parker, J. W., & Petit, J.-M. 2008a, The Orbital and Spatial Distribution of the Kuiper Belt, ed. M. A. Barucci, H. Boehnhardt, D. P. Cruikshank, A. Morbidelli, & R. Dotson (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), 59 -- 69 Kavelaars, J. J., Gladman, B., Petit, J., Parker, J. W., & Jones, L. 2008b, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 40, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #40, 481 Kavelaars, J. J., Jones, R. L., Gladman, B. J., et al. 2009, AJ, 137, 4917, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/6/4917 Kobayashi, H., & Ida, S. 2001, Icarus, 153, 416, doi: 10.1006/icar.2001.6700 Lawler, S. M., & Gladman, B. 2013, AJ, 146, 6, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/1/6 Lawler, S. M., Shankman, C., Kaib, N., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/33 Lawler, S. M., Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J. J., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 197, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aab8ff Levison, H. F., Morbidelli, A., Vanlaerhoven, C., Gomes, R., & Tsiganis, K. 2008, Icarus, 196, 258, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.11.035 Lykawka, P. S., & Mukai, T. 2008, AJ, 135, 1161, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1161 Malhotra, R. 1993, Nature, 365, 819, doi: 10.1038/365819a0 -- . 1995, AJ, 110, 420, doi: 10.1086/117532 Matthews, B. C., & Kavelaars, J. 2016, SSRv, 205, 213, doi: 10.1007/s11214-016-0249-0 Morbidelli, A., Gaspar, H. S., & Nesvorny, D. 2014, Icarus, 232, 81, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.12.023 Morbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. 2004, AJ, 128, 2564, doi: 10.1086/424617 OSSOS: X. How to use a Survey Simulator 19 Murray-Clay, R. A., & Chiang, E. I. 2005, ApJ, 619, 623, doi: 10.1086/426425 Nesvorn´y, D. 2015a, AJ, 150, 73, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/73 -- . 2015b, AJ, 150, 68, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/68 Nesvorn´y, D., & Vokrouhlick´y, D. 2016, ApJ, 825, 94, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/94 Nesvorn´y, D., Vokrouhlick´y, D., & Morbidelli, A. 2013, ApJ, 768, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/45 Nesvorn´y, D., Vokrouhlick´y, D., & Roig, F. 2016, ApJL, 827, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/827/2/L35 Parker, A. H. 2015, Icarus, 247, 112, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.09.043 Parker, A. H., & Kavelaars, J. J. 2010, ApJL, 722, L204, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/722/2/L204 Petit, J., Kavelaars, J. J., Gladman, B., et al. 2011, AJ Petit, J.-M., Holman, M., Scholl, H., Kavelaars, J., & Gladman, B. 2004, MNRAS, 347, 471, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07217.x Petit, J.-M., Morbidelli, A., & Valsecchi, G. B. 1999, Icarus, 141, 367, doi: 10.1006/icar.1999.6166 Petit, J.-M., Kavelaars, J. J., Gladman, B. J., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 236, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6aa5 Pike, R. E., Kavelaars, J. J., Petit, J. M., et al. 2015, AJ, 149, 202, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/202 Pike, R. E., & Lawler, S. 2017, AJ, 153, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5be9 Pike, R. E., Lawler, S., Brasser, R., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5be9 Schwamb, M. E., Brown, M. E., & Rabinowitz, D. L. 2009, ApJL, 694, L45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/L45 Schwamb, M. E., Brown, M. E., Rabinowitz, D. L., & Ragozzine, D. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1691, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1691 Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J., Gladman, B. J., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 31, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/31 Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J. J., Bannister, M. T., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7aed Sheppard, S. S., & Trujillo, C. 2016, AJ, 152, 221, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/152/6/221 Silsbee, K., & Tremaine, S. 2017, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03961 Stern, S. A. 1995, AJ, 110, 856, doi: 10.1086/117568 -- . 1996, A&A, 310, 999 Thommes, E. W., Duncan, M. J., & Levison, H. F. 1999, Nature, 402, 635, doi: 10.1038/45185 Trujillo, C. A., Jewitt, D. C., & Luu, J. X. 2001, AJ, 122, 457, doi: 10.1086/321117 Trujillo, C. A., & Sheppard, S. S. 2014, Nature, 507, 471, doi: 10.1038/nature13156 Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. 2005, Nature, 435, 459, doi: 10.1038/nature03539 Volk, K., & Malhotra, R. 2017, AJ, 154, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa79ff Volk, K., Murray-Clay, R., Gladman, B., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 23, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/1/23
1207.0836	1	1207	2012-07-03T21:10:51	Searching for the first Near-Earth Object family	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We report on our search for genetically related asteroids amongst the near-Earth object (NEO) population - families of NEOs akin to the well known main belt asteroid families. We used the technique proposed by Fu et al. (2005) supplemented with a detailed analysis of the statistical significance of the detected clusters. Their significance was assessed by comparison to identical searches performed on 1,000 'fuzzy-real' NEO orbit distribution models that we developed for this purpose. The family-free 'fuzzy-real' NEO models maintain both the micro and macro distribution of 5 orbital elements (ignoring the mean anomaly). Three clusters were identified that contain four or more NEOs but none of them are statistically significant at \geq 3{\sigma}. The most statistically significant cluster at the \sim 2{\sigma} level contains 4 objects with H < 20 and all members have long observational arcs and concomitant good orbital elements. Despite the low statistical significance we performed several other tests on the cluster to determine if it is likely a genetic family. The tests included examining the cluster's taxonomy, size-frequency distribution, consistency with a family-forming event during tidal disruption in a close approach to Mars, and whether it is detectable in a proper element cluster search. None of these tests exclude the possibility that the cluster is a family but neither do they confirm the hypothesis. We conclude that we have not identified any NEO families.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Searching for the first Near-Earth Object family Eva Schunov´aa, Mikael Granvikb,e, Robert Jedickeb, Giovanni Gronchic, Richard Wainscoatb, Shinsuke Abed E-mail: [email protected] aDepartment of Astronomy, Physics of the Earth and Meteorology, Comenius University, Mlynsk´a dolina, Bratislava, 942 48, Slovakia bInstitute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 cDipartimento di Matematica, University of Pisa, Piazzale B. Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, dInstitute of Astronomy, National Central University, No. 300, Jhongda Rd., Jhongli, eDepartment of Physics, P.O. BOX 64, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Taoyuan, 32001, Taiwan. Italy Submitted June 6, 2018 Manuscript pages: 36 Tables: 3 Figures: 9 1 Proposed Running Head: Searching for the first NEO Family Editorial correspondence to: Eva Schunova Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii 2680 Woodlawn Drive Honolulu, HI 96822 Phone: +1 808 294 6299 Fax: +1 808 988 2790 E-mail: [email protected] 2 Abstract We report on our search for genetically related asteroids amongst the near-Earth object (NEO) population -- families of NEOs akin to the well known main belt aster- oid families. We used the technique proposed by Fu et al. (2005) supplemented with a detailed analysis of the statistical significance of the detected clusters. Their signifi- cance was assessed by comparison to identical searches performed on 1,000 'fuzzy-real' NEO orbit distribution models that we developed for this purpose. The family-free 'fuzzy-real' NEO models maintain both the micro and macro distribution of 5 orbital elements (ignoring the mean anomaly). Three clusters were identified that contain four or more NEOs but none of them are statistically significant at ≥ 3σ. The most statistically significant cluster at the ∼ 2σ level contains 4 objects with H < 20 and all members have long observational arcs and concomitant good orbital elements. De- spite the low statistical significance we performed several other tests on the cluster to determine if it is likely a genetic family. The tests included examining the cluster's taxonomy, size-frequency distribution, consistency with a family-forming event during tidal disruption in a close approach to Mars, and whether it is detectable in a proper element cluster search. None of these tests exclude the possibility that the cluster is a family but neither do they confirm the hypothesis. We conclude that we have not identified any NEO families. Key Words: NEAR-EARTH OBJECTS, ASTEROIDS, DYNAMICS 3 1 Introduction We report here on our null search for a statistically significant cluster of genetically related near-Earth objects (NEO). The identification of such a NEO 'family' would enable further research into the physical characteristics of NEOs as was the case with the identification of asteroid families in the main belt, Jupiter Trojan and Trans-Neptunian minor planet popula- tions. The physical characteristics of the ensemble of NEO family members -- taxonomic and mineralogical types, sizes, rotation periods, shapes, pole orientations, existence of satellites, etc. -- would lead to a better understanding of their morphology and the mechanisms affect- ing their dynamical and collisional evolution. If the family members have a small minimum orbital intersection distance (MOID) with the Earth (or any other planet) their presence on a sub-set of dangerous orbits will increase the total impact probability over what is currently understood because the enhancement in orbit element phase space is not incorporated into contemporary NEO models. In one sense there are already some known NEO families since associations have been proposed between several meteor showers and their presumed parent body NEOs (both asteroids and comets, e.g. Sekanina 1973, Porubcan et al. 2004). The most known and well-accepted is the connection between the unusual B-type NEO (3200) Phaethon and the Geminid meteor complex Ohtsuka et al. (2008). However, the associations between meteors and NEOs are not families in the traditional undestanding. The known asteroid families are produced through the catastrophic disruption of a parent asteroid in a severe impact with another asteroid. The discovery of genetically related pairs of asteroids in the main belt (e.g. Vokrouhlick´y & Nesvorn´y 2008) suggests that other mechanisms may produce asteroid families such as the spin-up and rotational fission of rapidly rotating objects or the splitting of unstable binary asteroids. Meteoroids are the small-end tail of those family creation mechanisms but can also be produced through surface ejection driven by the volatilization of sub-surface ices on comets or 'active asteroids'. While no formal distinction exists between the meteor 'families' and the asteroid families the size ratio between the largest and second largest fragments nicely divides the samples and creation mechanisms. No NEO families have been identified and confirmed. Drummond (2000) suggested that there were many 'associations' in the NEO population but Fu et al. (2005) showed that all of them were likely chance alignments of their orbits. The dearth of NEO families is in contrast to the more than 50 families known in the main belt (e.g. Nesvorn´y et al. 2005). Indeed, Hirayama (1918) proposed the existence of main belt asteroid families when there were only 790 known main belt asteroids while there are now more than 7,500 known NEOs. Asteroid families are typically identified by the similarity of the family member's or- bital elements. Several metrics have been developed to quantify the orbital similarity (e.g. Southworth & Hawkins 1963, Valsecchi et al. 1999, Jopek et al. 2008, Vokrouhlick´y & Nesvorn´y 2008). The best known is the Southworth-Hawkins D-criterion (DSH; Southworth & Hawkins 1963) that was developed and used to search for parent comets of meteor streams and to link meteor streams with NEOs (e.g. Gajdos & Porubcan 2005, Ohtsuka et al. 2008). It is important to keep in mind that simply identifying members within a population with similar orbital elements does not mean that they are actually a genetically related family. 4 i.e. that they do not necessarily derive from a single parent object. As the number of objects in the population increases there is a corresponding increase in the likelihood that chance associations will mimic families and extra care must be taken to establish a proposed family's statistical significance. The major difference between the ability to identify families in the NEO and main belt populations is that the orbits of asteroids in the main belt are stable on timescales comparable to the age of solar system. Their long term stability allows the calculation of most objects' proper elements (e.g. Knezevi´c et al. 2002), essentially time-averaged orbital elements, that are better suited to the identification of similar orbits that are the hallmarks of asteroid families. Furthermore, the non-gravitational evolution of the main belt asteroids' orbits is slow under the influence of the Yarkovsky effect (e.g. Vokrouhlick´y et al. 2006a) so that they occupy the same orbital element phase space for long periods of time. The main belt families identified by the similarity in their orbit elements range in age from millions to billions of years. Spectroscopic campaigns have confirmed that the members of older families typically share the same spectral type; as expected if they all derive from the same parent body and/or are covered by similar regolith during the family formation event (e.g. Cellino et al. 2002, Ivezi`c et al. 2002a). Near Earth objects on the other hand reside in a turbulent dynamical environment with average lifetimes of ∼ 106 yr under the strong gravitational influence of the terrestrial planets and Jupiter (e.g. Morbidelli et al. 2002, Gladman et al. 1997). Thus, the calculation of NEO proper elements is difficult because they may cross the orbits of the planets during their time evolution (Gronchi & Milani 2001). The resulting NEO proper elements are only valid for the time between their close encounters with the planets and when mean motion resonances of low order with the planets do not occur. The search for similar orbits amongst the NEO population using only the osculating elements is even more limited in the time frame over which the orbits maintain their coherence (Pauls & Gladman 2005). Furthermore, the non-gravitational accelerations acting on NEOs are generally much stronger than those acting on the more distant asteroids of the solar system. Thus, if a NEO family exists it will only be possible to identify it for a short time period after its creation as its members rapidly disperse. NEO families might form by several imaginable methods (Fu et al. 2005): • spontaneous disruption (e.g. YORP spin-up, internal thermal stresses) • tidal disruption during close approach to a planet • intra-NEO collisions • collision with a smaller main belt asteroid It is difficult or impossible to assign a likelihood to the different formation mechanisms. While 11% of comets spontaneously disrupt (e.g. Massi & Foglia 2009) as they enter the inner solar system (1.0AU < q ≤ 1.5AU), presumably due to thermal stresses induced by approaching the Sun, the NEOs have typically resided in the terrestrial planet zone for long 5 periods of time and many orbital periods. They are thus unlikely to disrupt by this mecha- nism. On the other hand, simulations suggest that the YORP thermal torque can increase an asteroid's spin rate to the point where it spontaneously sheds material and some of this ma- terial may be ejected faster than the parent body's escape speed (e.g. Walsh & Richardson 2006, Pravec et al. 2010, Jacobson & Scheeres 2011). If the process is repeated multiple times over a short time span it might be possible to create an asteroid family in this manner. Families created in this way might be distinguished by their rotation rates, mass ratios, or pole orientations of their members. Tidal disruption of NEOs may occur when they pass close to a planet (e.g. Richardson et al. 1998, Walsh & Richardson 2006, 2008) as occurred in the production of the family of objects associated with Comet Shoemaker-Levy-9 (Sekanina et al. 1994). While the tidal disruption of asteroids has been simulated under a variety of conditions (e.g., spin rate, pole orienta- tion, closest approach distance, encounter speed), there is no estimate of how many tidal disruptions actually occur. The likelihood of forming NEO families with the third mechanism is probably relatively small, since the space number-density of NEOs is very small compared to the space number- density of main belt asteroids (Bottke et al. 1996). Perhaps the most likely formation mechanism for a NEO family is a collision between the NEO and a smaller main belt asteroid (Bottke et al. 1996). Many NEOs remain on orbits with aphelia in or beyond the main belt where they are typically slower than other asteroids at the same distance and therefore suffer higher speed collisions compared to those between two main belt asteroids at the same heliocentric distance. Thus, smaller projectiles could be effective impactors at catastrophically disrupting a NEO. In summary, NEO families will provide to the opportunity of exploring the physics of asteroid disruptions at different scales and for different reasons than those observed in the main belt. 2 Method We searched for families in the NEO population using the method proposed by Fu et al. (2005). The technique identifies subsets of objects with similar orbits within a population. We used their osculating elements, because of the problems involved in calculating NEO proper elements. We are thus limited to identifying NEO families that have formed relatively recently though this is not really a problem because 1) NEO dynamical lifetimes1 are on the order of a million years and 2) young families are interesting. We used the Southworth-Hawkins DSH criteria (§2.1) to quantify the similarity between two orbits. It could be argued that other criteria would yield better results but this criteria has been well tested and forms the basis of the Fu et al. (2005) technique. A set of NEOs that all have mutual DSH criteria below a threshold Dcluster is considered a 'cluster'. The technique allows for and favors sub-clustering within the cluster under the assumption that 1A NEO's dynamical lifetime is the time during which it remains in the NEO region. 6 there could be a tight 'core' within a cluster surrounded by a looser assemblage of related objects. We used the Minor Planet Center (MPC) mpcorb.dat orbit element data set that contained 7,563 NEOs as of March 2011 (through 2011 DW ). The technique is described in detail below. The real difficulty in identifying NEO families is not the identification of the clusters but in establishing their statistical significance. Indeed, as shown by Fu et al. (2005) for NEOs and Pauls & Gladman (2005) for fireballs, it is surprisingly difficult to prove that similar orbits are statistically significant within a population. We first tested our method on synthetic family-free NEO orbit models but then developed more realistic family-free NEO models derived from the known NEO population. We used multiple instances of the family-free NEO models to establish the statistical significance of our NEO clusters. 2.1 The Southworth-Hawkins D-criterion The Southworth-Hawkins DSH metric quantifies the similarity of two orbits using five orbital elements (Southworth & Hawkins 1963). We use the DSH metric in its original form because it has an established pedigree (e.g. searching for parent comets of meteor streams) that has been used to successfully identify members of known meteor streams (Southworth & Hawkins 1963, Sekanina 1970) and main belt asteroid families (Lindblad & Southworth 1971). The DSH metric between two orbits denoted with subscripts m and n is defined by: with DSH = pd1 2 + d2 2 + d3 2 + d4 2, d1 = qm − qn AU , d2 = em − en, d3 = 2 sin (I/2), d4 = (em + en) sin (Π/2) I = arccos [cos im cos in + sin im sin in cos (Ωm − Ωn)], Π = (ωm − ωn) ± 2 arcsin(cid:20)cos im + in 2 sin Ωm − Ωn 2 sec I 2(cid:21), (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) where q = a(1 − e) is the perihelion distance, a is the semi-major axis, e is the eccentricity, i the inclination, Ω is the longitude of the ascending node and ω is the argument of perihelion. I represents the angle between the poles of the two orbits and Π represents the angle between their perihelia directions (Drummond 2000). Use the positive sign for the arcsin term in eq. 7 when Ωm − Ωn ≤ 180◦ and the negative sign otherwise. 7 2.2 Identifying clusters in orbital element space We adopted the cluster identification method developed by Fu et al. (2005) that in turn incorporated the techniques described by Drummond (2000). A 'cluster' is a grouping of objects with mutually similar orbits whereas we will reserve the term 'family' for a cluster with high statistical significance that contains members that are likely genetically related. Fu et al. (2005) showed in limited testing that the method is capable of identifying synthetic NEO families with minimal contamination. We grouped objects into clusters based on the values of 4 parameters that are described in greater detail below: • Dcluster: The maximum DSH between any pair of objects in a cluster. • Dpair: The maximum DSH between 'tight' pairs in a cluster. • SCRmin: The minimum String length to Cluster size Ratio. • P Fmin: The minimum fraction of pairs of asteroids in the cluster with DSH < Dpair. We identified candidate clusters as sets of N objects with mutual DSH < Dcluster. Within each candidate cluster we then identified all pairs (n) of asteroids with DSH < Dpair. The pair fraction P F is the number of detected pairs divided by the number of all possible pairs in the cluster (P F = n/ N (N −1) ) and we required that all our clusters satisfy P F > P Fmin. Then, within each candidate cluster we determined the maximum string length L -- the maximum number of objects that are connected in a continuous pair-wise fashion such that each sequential pair in the string satisfies DSH < Dpair. The SCR is the ratio of the number of objects in the string to the number of objects in the cluster, SCR = L/N, and our final set of clusters all satisfy SCR > SCRmin. Note that a string must contain more than two objects. 2 The goal of our selection criteria is to identify tight clusters of objects in orbital element space but the P F and SCR cuts recognize that as NEOs undergo rapid dynamical and non- gravitational evolution some of the members may evolve quickly onto different orbits. The pair and string searches allow for a tight 'core' of objects with a periphery of other objects. 2.3 Selecting thresholds for the cluster identification algorithm While it is simple to verify that our algorithm can identify objects in clusters with simi- lar orbital elements it is not trivial to select the four threshold parameters (Dcluster, Dpair, SCRmin, P Fmin) to maximize the cluster detection efficiency while minimizing the contami- nation by false positives. This required a family-free NEO orbit distribution model that also incorporated the observational selection effects typical of the asteroid surveys contributing the current NEO inventory. The selection effects are important because e.g. they favor the discovery of objects on Earth-like orbits and therefore increase the orbital element phase- space density of known objects on these types of orbits. 8 2.3.1 Synthetic family-free NEO model To generate our synthetic family-free NEO model we started with the set of NEOs from the Synthetic Solar System Model (S3M; Grav et al. 2011). The S3M includes over 11 million objects ranging from those that orbit the Sun entirely interior to the Earth's orbit to the most distant reaches of the solar system. The 268,896 NEOs with absolute magnitude H < 25.0 in the S3M were generated in accordance with the (a, e, i) orbital element residence-time distribution of the Bottke et al. (2002) NEO model. The model does not include any NEO families. To model the observational selection effects on the S3M NEO population we performed a long-term survey simulation using the Pan-STARRS Moving Object Processing System (Denneau et al. 2007). MOPS was developed to process source detection data from Pan- STARRS (Kaiser et al. 2010) but also incorporates real-time processing of synthetic detec- tions to monitor the system's performance. Thus, it can be also used as a pure survey simulator. In an ecliptic longitude (λ0) and latitude (β) system centered on the opposition point (λ0, β) = (0◦, 0◦) the MOPS simulated survey2 region is broken into two regions covering about 5,500 deg2: 1) the opposition region with λ0 < 30◦ and β < 40◦ and 2) two 'sweet spots' with β < 10◦ and 60◦ < λ0 < 90◦. MOPS uses a full N-body ephemeris determination to calculate the exact (RA, Dec) of every NEO in each synthetic field and then degrades the astrometry to the realized PS1 astrometric error level of 0.1′′ (Milani et al. (2012) have shown that PS1 achieves ∼ 0.13′′ absolute astrometric error). The photometry for each object is degraded in a S/N-dependent manner such that as S/N→5 the magnitude error approaches ∼0.1 mag. MOPS then makes a cut at S/N=5 to simulate the statistical loss of detections near the PS1 system's limiting magnitude1 of R ∼22.7. Each field is observed twice each night within ∼15 minutes to allow the formation of tracklets, pairs of detections at nearly the same spatial location, that might represent the same solar system object. Fields are re-observed 3 times per lunation (simulated weather permitting) and tracklets are linked across nights to form tracks that are then tested for consistency using an initial orbit determination (IOD). Detections in tracks with small astrometric residuals in the IOD are subsequently dif- ferentially corrected to obtain a final orbit. Our four-year MOPS survey simulation on the S3M NEO population yielded 8,020 derived objects (synthetic discoveries). Fig. 1 shows that the derived synthetic NEOs are a rough match to the known NEOs. Thus, our NEO survey simulation yields a set of synthetic NEOs that are a proxy for the known population including their observational selection effects (Jedicke et al. 2002). Pan-STARRS is currently operating a single prototype telescope on Haleakala, Hawaii, known as PS1. 2The simulated survey discussed herein is only loosely related to the actual PS1 survey. The details of the survey simulation are not important -- all that matters is that the simulated survey reproduces the observational selection effects of the ensemble of surveys that produced the known NEO population. The litmus test is whether the resulting simulated orbit element distributions match the known orbit distributions. 9 2.3.2 Cluster identification in the synthetic NEO model With a large amount of computing time we could identify the set of clusters detectable in the real NEO population for all possible combinations of the four thresholds -- Dcluster, Dpair, SCRmin and P Rmin. But this is impractical because we will also need to run orders of magnitude more tests to establish the detected clusters' statistical significance. We were guided in our selection of the thresholds by previous work, our own experience, and testing the algorithm on the synthetic NEO model. Fig. 2 shows the results of the cluster identification method applied to the family-free synthetic NEO model using Dcluster = 0.060 and Dpair = 0.058 without any cuts on SCR and P F . Even though our DSH thresholds are already considerably tighter than those proposed by Fu et al. (2005) we still identify many false clusters containing 3 members. We even identify one false 5-member cluster with SCR = 0.8 and P F = 0.3! However, the number of false clusters drops quickly with the number of cluster members (42 triplets, seven 4-member clusters and only one 5-member cluster). As the synthetic model is a good representation of the real NEO population we expect roughly the same number of false clusters amongst the real NEOs when we use the same Dcluster - Dpair cuts. Thus, even though we will explore the full range of tighter thresholds on the Dcluster and Dpair values as described below, based on Fig. 2 we will use SCRmin = 0.75 and P Fmin = 0.5 to identify clusters containing ≥ 4 members and not inspect the clusters containing NEO pairs and triplets. Establishing the smaller clusters' statistical significance will be difficult or impossible using the techniques developed here. In the following section §2.4 we will use the thresholds derived here to identify real NEO families for detailed analysis. However, when we measure the statistical significance of those NEO families in §3 we will abandon the synthetic model in favor of a more realistic one -- but the more realistic model must be created using the thresholds derived here. 2.4 NEO clusters in the real population We identified three clusters of four or more members in the real NEO population from the mpcorb.dat database3. (We will ignore the 13 triplets and 243 pairs identified with the same cuts.) The members' orbital elements and other physical parameters are provided in Tables 1 and 2. The three clusters are labelled C1, C2 and C3, and have 4, 6 and 5 members respectively. The absolute magnitudes of the cluster members spans 18.5 < H < 29.5 corresponding to diameters ranging from several meters up to several hundreds of meters depending on the choice of albedo. The total number of ≥ 4 member clusters identified in the real data should be compared to the 0 ≥ 4 member clusters identified in the family-free synthetic data with SCRmin = 0.75 and P Fmin = 0.5 (see Fig. 2). The disparity in the number of ≥ 4-member clusters could be due to the presence of real NEO families but we will argue below that it is due to the lack of fidelity in the synthetic NEO model -- we find that the synthetic NEO model must be 3http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/MPCORB.html 10 exquisitely matched to the real NEO population in order to assess the statistical significance of the detected clusters. The C1 cluster is the only one composed of objects with H < 20 and, more importantly, the only one containing objects with orbital arcs longer than 100 days. The C1 cluster members' orbital element uncertainties are typically 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than the other two clusters. All the C1 members belong to the Amor4 NEO sub-population so that they do not cross the Earth's orbit. Indeed, the members of this cluster have a perihelion distance of ∼ 1.25 AU implying that if the cluster is a genetic NEO family it has probably never approached close to the Earth or Venus. Considering the similarity of all 5 orbital elements the cluster must have formed relatively recently and it is unlikely that the cluster or its members could have approached the Earth and then evolved onto orbits that do not cross the Earth's on a short time scale. In contrast to the C1 cluster, the C2 and C3 clusters are composed of small objects with H > 21.1 and H > 27.7 respectively and include objects with orbital arcs sometimes spanning just several days. The short arc lengths yield large uncertainties on the orbital elements which in turn induce a large uncertainty in the C2 and C3 DSH. The clusters thus illustrate how false associations can arise because of the orbit element uncertainties. The nominal orbits of the two clusters place them in the Apollo NEO sub-population with the C2 cluster lying close to the Amor-Apollo transition and the C3 cluster close to the Apollo-Aten transition. Their location near the transition regions is not a coincidence -- these small objects were identified by NEO surveys only because their orbits bring them very close to Earth. The perihelion distance is ∼ 1.00 AU for the members of the C2 cluster while the members of the C3 cluster are on very Earth-like orbits with a ∼ 1.00 and e < 0.1. Establishing the C2 and C3 clusters' statistical significance would be difficult because observational selection effects are not well-characterized for objects in their size range and this induces a large uncertainty in the orbit and size-distribution models for small NEOs. Given the problems with the C2 and C3 clusters we will concentrate on establishing the statistical significance of the C1 cluster. One method of doing so is to run the cluster finding algorithm on many instances of the synthetic family-free NEO model described in §2.3.1. If we identify ≤ 3 false clusters of ≥ 4 members in 1,000 realizations of the synthetic NEO model we could claim that C1 is statistically significant with ≥ 99.7% or ≥ 3σ confidence. We did not employ this technique because of our concerns with the use of the ∼ 10 year old Bottke et al. (2002) NEO model that underestimates the number of Amor-type NEOs like the members of the C1 cluster. There are currently 474 known Amors with H < 18 (as of March 2011) compared to the Bottke et al. (2002) prediction of 310 ± 38 -- a > 4σ difference between the real and synthetic NEO populations. If the Bottke et al. (2002) NEO model underestimates the number of Amor-type NEOs then it would imply that we will overestimate the C1 cluster's statistical significance. Furthermore, the synthetic NEO model relies on a survey simulation that was not intended to perfectly model real surveys and yields ∼6% more objects than the real NEO population with small but perhaps significant skewing 4The Amors have perihelion distance q in the range 1.0167 AU< q ≤1.3 AU, Apollos have a > 1.0 AU and q ≤ 1.0167 AU and the Atens have a < 1.0 AU and aphelion Q > 0.983AU. 11 in the synthetic orbital element distributions as shown in Fig. 1. We need a better synthetic NEO model as described in the next section. 2.4.1 Fuzzy real NEO models The main problem with the Bottke et al. (2002) synthetic NEO model is illustrated in Fig. 3 -- there is a huge discrepancy between the normalized DSH distributions for the closest pairs within the real and synthetic NEO populations. But establishing the statistical significance of our NEO clusters requires a large number of independent high-fidelity family-free NEO models that incorporate observational selection effects. Thus, we developed NEO models using a technique that i) maintains both the micro and macro distribution of 5 orbital elements (ignoring the mean anomaly) and ii) eliminates any possible real clusters. Our solution was to 'fuzz' the orbital elements of each real NEO around its position in 5-dimensional orbital element space in a manner that maintained the local orbital element phase-space density and thereby preserves both the intrinsic NEO orbital element distribu- tion and the observational selection effects. For each NEO (k) in the real population we identified its closest neighbor as the object with the smallest DSH ≡ Df uzz. We then gen- erated a new 'fuzzy' synthetic orbit (n) that has DSH ≤ Df uzz with respect to the original orbit as described below. If all the difference between the original and new orbit is due to a single orbital element (e.g. ∆a = an − ak) then we obtain ∆a, ∆e, ∆i, ∆ω, and ∆Ω from: Df uzz = (∆a) AU (1 − e) = ∆e p1 + (a/AU)2 = 2 sin(∆i/2) = 2e sin(∆ω/2) = qd3 ′2 + d4 ′2 d3 d4 ′ = 2 sin (I∆Ω/2), ′ = 2e sin(Π∆Ω/2), where and I∆Ω = arccos(cid:2)cos2 i + sin2 i cos ∆Ω(cid:3) Π∆Ω = 2 arcsin(cid:20)cos i sin 2 (cid:21). I∆Ω sec ∆Ω 2 (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) We then generated a 'fuzzed' orbit with (a′, e′, i′, ω ′, Ω′) where the elements x′ were generated randomly within the range [x − ∆x, x + ∆x]. Finally, we calculated the D∆ between the 12 original and the fuzzed orbit and repeated the generation of the fuzzed orbit for the object until D∆ < Df uzz. We also repeated the synthetic object generation if the new orbit was not a NEO (had perihelion a′(1 − e′) > 1.3 AU), was hyperbolic (i.e. e′ ≥ 1), or unphysical (e.g. a′ ≤ 0, e′ ≤ 0). We generated 1,000 instances of these 'fuzzy-real NEO models' to be used for establishing the statistical significance of our NEO clusters. We tested the generation of the fuzzy-real NEO models by generating a series of models fuzzed by D′ f uzz = ff uzz Df uzz with ff uzz = 0.0, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 and verified that the models behave as expected and as ff uzz → 0 the generated model reproduces the input model exactly. The remaining problem with the fuzzy-real NEO models is that if the real NEO population contains real families then so will the fuzzy-real NEO models. We needed to remove any real NEO families from the model first -- but this is difficult to accomplish when there are no known real NEO families. Instead, we used our own cluster results agnostically with the assumption that it does not matter whether the clusters we identified are real or not, all that matters is how often the fuzzing process generates false clusters. Thus, i) using the cluster detection thresholds determined with the synthetic NEO population described in §2.3.1 we identified all clusters containing ≥ 3 members and ii) treated the largest member of each cluster as any other NEO as described above but iii) fuzzed the orbits of the 18 smaller members of the clusters with ff uzz = 10. We needed to keep the 18 small objects in the model because they represent about 0.3% of the total known NEO population -- about equal to the 3σ contribution to the NEO model that we were attempting to measure. On the other hand we needed to keep them in roughly the correct location in the NEO orbit distribution. Fig. 1 shows that the fuzzy-real NEO models' semi-major axis, eccentricity and inclination distributions match the known NEO population far better than the synthetic NEO model. Even more importantly, Figs. 3 and 4 show that the fuzzy-real NEO models preserve both the micro and macro DSH distributions (respectively) of the real NEO population that are critical to using the models to establish the statistical significance of the NEO clusters. Note that the DSH distribution of the real NEOs is systematically slightly higher than the fuzzy-real NEO model at small DSH in Fig. 3. This would be the expected signature if there were real families in the real NEO population. The data point in the lowest DSH bins in Fig. 3 represent two separate pairs of NEOs. If these two pairs were real it would imply that they were statistically significant but it turned out that they were subsequently identified by the Minor Planet Center as corresponding to the same physical object. Thus, it is reassuring 1) that our fuzzy-real NEO model DSH distribution agrees well with the real NEOs and 2) that our technique successfully identified identical NEOs. 3 Results and discussion The shaded regions in Fig. 5 show the results of running our cluster identification algorithm on the 1,000 family-free fuzzy-real NEO models described above. We searched for clusters containing ≥ 4 members over the range of Dcluster -- Dpair space with 0.040 ≤ Dcluster ≤ 0.060 where Dpair ≤ Dcluster using fixed SCRmin = 0.75 and P Fmin = 0.5 as described in §2.3.2. It 13 is surprisingly easy to create NEO clusters with ≥ 4 members. The shaded areas in the figure correspond to regions where we detected a total of a minimum of 3, 46 or 317 clusters in the 1,000 models. The regions correspond to 3-, 2- and 1σ confidence levels on the detection of clusters in the real NEO population. Fig. 5 also shows the location of our detected C1, C2 and C3 clusters in the real NEO population. The clusters can be identified over a limited range of Dcluster -- Dpair with the most statistically significant point typically having the smallest Dcluster and Dpair. It may be surprising that the clusters are not identified in a broad fan extending upwards and to the right in the figure. The truncation in the region in which they are identifiable is due to the SCRmin = 0.75 and P Fmin = 0.5 cuts -- using looser values of Dcluster and Dpair allows the cluster to 'absorb' other nearby objects but these objects then typically drive the cluster's SCR and P F values below the SCRmin and P Fmin thresholds. Fig. 5 shows that the C1 cluster is statistically significant at ∼2.0σ. The C2 and C3 clusters are likely even less significant based on their large Dcluster and Dpair error bars extending well into the insignificant region of the figure. It is important to remember that our calculated statistical significance of the NEO clusters hinges on the reliability of our fuzzy-real NEO models described in §2.4.1. Given that all 4 C1 members are relatively large NEOs with H < 20 we repeated the entire search for clusters using only those NEOs with H < 20 and re-calculated their statistical significance. As expected, the statistical significance of the C1 cluster increases to about 3σ because of the reduction in the total number of NEOs to ∼ 3100. While we have taken every precaution in developing our NEO models we understand that they have their limitations. For instance, the statistical significance of the NEO clusters increases/decreases if we 'fuzz' the model more/less (ff uzz >/<1). We assume that the 'natural' value is ff uzz = 1 and use this value when quoting the statistical significance of our NEO clusters. In the remainder of this work we consider only the C1 cluster as a candidate NEO family. 3.1 Dismembering the C1 cluster In this sub-section we perform several tests of the C1 cluster to determine if it is consistent with being a genetically related NEO family. 3.1.1 Provenance and taxonomy Despite our minor caveats with the Bottke et al. (2002) NEO model described above it can still be used to estimate the probability that a NEO derives from one of their five NEO source regions. The C1 cluster falls in the NEO model bin with central a = 2.150 AU, e = 0.425 and i = 7.5◦ for which objects have ∼35% probability of deriving from the ν6 region and a ∼63% chance of having evolved from the so called 'Mars Crossing' region. In other words, a nearly 100% probability of deriving from a source in the inner region of the main belt. The inner region of the belt is dominated by S-class asteroids (e.g. Zellner 1979) so it is a little surprising that SDSS spectrophotometry (from the 4th Moving Object Catalog, MOC4; 14 Ivezi`c et al. 2002b) for the only available C1 cluster member, 2000 HW23, is not S-like5. We performed a simple linear interpolation and extrapolation of the 2000 HW23 SDSS MOC4 5- band spectrophotometry and error bars to the SMASSII bands' central wavelengths (Phase II of the Small Main-Belt Asteroid Spectroscopic Survey; Bus & Binzel 2002). (The only extrapolation was from the real data point at 892 nm to the data point at 920 nm.) Even if at first glance the asteroid appears to be most similar to the O-type due to the dip in reflectivity at long wavelengths (see Fig. 6) a normalized χ2 fit of the 2000 HW23 spectrophotometry to 26 major asteroid classes from A through Xk (from Bus & Binzel 2002) suggests that it is most consistent with the unusual B-type, a subset of the larger C-complex. The O-type provides a close second best fit. In general, keeping in mind that the fit used data extrapolated from the SDSS MOC4 catalogue, 2000 HW23 yields good fits with the different types in the C-complex -- not the S-class that dominates the inner main belt. The case for the C1 cluster being a legitimate family will be strengthened if the spectra of other C1 cluster members can be shown to be similar to 2000 HW23 and belonging to the C-complex. 3.1.2 Size-frequency distribution Under the assumption that C1 is a family we can estimate the slope of the family's size- frequency distribution (SFD) assuming that the SFD is proportional to 10αH. An unrea- sonable value of the slope would indicate that the cluster might not be a genetic family. Converting the observed C1 cluster member's H values into the true SFD requires the de- tection efficiency as a function of absolute magnitude, ǫ(H), for objects with C1-like orbits. We estimated ǫ(H) using the synthetic survey simulation described in §2.3.1 by dividing the number of derived objects with C1-like orbits by the number of objects in the input model. The survey simulation does a good enough job of reproducing the real NEO population for the purpose of estimating this efficiency and will not dominate the induced error on the measured SFD. We found a reasonable fit to the efficiency from the synthetic data using ǫ(H) = ǫ0 1 + exp[(H − L)/w] (18) with nominal values of ǫ0 = 1.0, L=20.0 and w = 0.76. A maximum likelihood fit to the 4 C1 members' H distribution yields α = 0.23+0.10 −0.08 where the error bars are statistical-only. The statistical errors on the fit are much larger than the systematic errors introduced by the uncertainty on the efficiency function parameters. The slope of the C1 cluster's SFD (Fig. 7) is shallower but not inconsistent with the overall NEO population's SFD of 0.35±0.02 measured by Bottke et al. (2002) for H<22 and it is surprisingly close to the value of 0.26±0.03 for H&18 from Mainzer et al. (2011). Parker et al. (2008) measured the SFD for many main belt families and found that they can have complicated SFDs that can not be fit by a single power-law and that they have a wide 5We used the solar colors from Bilir & Karaali (2005), Allen et al. (2005) 15 range of slopes. The slope varies from 0.35 to 0.97 for single-slope families and from 0.10 to 0.62 at the faint end of the H distribution for families with a broken power law SFD (i.e. H values approaching those of the C1 cluster members). Furthermore, Richardson et al. (1998) suggests that tidally disrupted asteroid families have shallow SFDs. Thus, we can not use the SFD slope to exclude the hypothesis that the cluster is a family since the measured value is consistent with slopes of established families. 3.1.3 Backward orbit integrations & tidal disruption at Mars If the C1 cluster is the remnant of a recently formed family then we expect that a backward integration of the 4 member's nominal orbits would show a rapid convergence to a single orbit and the time frame for the convergence would indicate the time of the family's formation (e.g. as observed in the Karin family; Nesvorn´y et al. 2006b). On the contrary, Fig. 8 shows that the nominal orbits are similar but undergo a gradual dispersal moving 100 ky into the past. i.e. they appear to have converged to their most similar orbits at the present time. The semi-major axis, eccentricity and inclinations of the members remain similar but the longitude of perihelion and ascending nodes gradually diverge. The effect is summarized in panel Fig. 8F showing the evolution of the cluster's DSH with time. We note that two pairs of objects remain tight in their mutual DSH for the entire integration. Given the apparent stability of the cluster members' orbits we integrated all 4 nominal orbits backwards for 10 million years and found that they are exceptionally similar back to 1.5 Myr in the past. The mutual orbital stability is unusual for NEOs given that the numerical integrations showed numerous close encounters of all objects with Mars during this time. The lack of convergence of the nominal C1 members' orbital elements suggests that they are not genetically linked. To firmly establish the statistical significance of the C1 cluster's genetic relationship would require the generation of hundreds of clones of each C1 member and similarly generating clones for a large number of C1-like clusters. Rather than explore that computationally challenging route we explored a few instances of the opposite question -- is it possible that a family producing event in the recent past can reproduce the observed C1 cluster's orbit and DSH distribution? We created 500 clones for each of the four C1 members where each clone is consistent with the available astrometry (the clones were generated using the covariance sampling technique in the OpenOrb orbit- computation package; Granvik et al. 2009). We integrated all the clones backwards in time for 100 ky and discovered that all of the objects suffered several close approaches with Mars and a large number of clones approached to within Mars' Hill sphere. Since the C1 cluster is composed of Amor type NEOs we did not expect nor identify any close approaches to the Earth and Venus. One 2000 HW23 clone passed inside Mars' Roche limit ∼70,800 years ago and is therefore a candidate for tidal disruptions (assuming that the parent body is a spherical fluid or rubble pile with a density ρ=1.95 g-cm−3 like (25143) Itokawa (Abe et al. 2006), Mars's Roche limit is ∼3.08 Mars radii). This result needs to be tempered with a comparison to the likelihood that any NEO will approach to within Mars' Roche limit in the same time frame. We found that 5,070 of 8,133 known NEO's nominal orbits approach Mars to within 1 Hill radii at least 16 once during the last 100,000 years. Assuming that close approaches to within the Roche limit are as likely for clones of all NEOs (1 in 2000 C1 clones) then we might expect that about 2.5 of the known NEOs have actually approached to within Mars' Roche limit and could be candidates for tidal disruption. Perhaps the C1 cluster's hypothetical parent body is one of them and we will represent it as 2000 HW23 -- the clone that made the closest approach to Mars mentioned above. To study the properties of a family of objects created by tidal disruption by Mars we created twelve 2000 HW23 clones at the moment of its closest approach of 0.63 Mars Roche radii. The twelve secondary clones have ∆ ~vx, or ∆ ~vy, or ∆ ~vz of ±1 m-s−1 and ±5 m-s−1 with respect to 2000 HW23. Simulations suggest that the tidal disruption process creates fragments with relative speeds of < 1 m-s−1 (Kevin Walsh, personal communication) so that our integrations will overestimate the spread in the orbital elements of tidally disrupted families. All 13 objects (2000 HW23 and its 12 secondary clones) were integrated forward from the time of closest encounter to the present epoch with the same Bulirsch-Stoer integration routine and same time step as our other integrations. Panels A-E in Fig. 9 show that the values and ranges of a, e and i for the ±1 m-s−1 and ±5 m-s−1 groups of secondary clones are comparable to the values and ranges of the real C1 members. The ranges of Ω and ω, i .e. the spread of values within the two sets of 2000 HW23 clones and the 4 C1 cluster members, are also similar. The values of Ω and ω for the 2000 HW23 clones and the 4 C1 cluster members do not need to agree at the present time because the 2000 HW23 secondary clones were created from a single 2000 HW23 clone whose orbit is slightly different from 2000 HW23 due to the former's deep approach to Mars (their semi-major axes differ by 0.05 AU). The difference between Ω and ω for the 2000 HW23 clones and the 4 C1 cluster members is thus due to their different precession rates that are sensitive to the initial values of semi-major axes (Murray & Dermott 1999). Note that the actual C1 cluster member's values show evidence of slightly more spreading than the 2000 HW23 secondary clones. Indeed, Fig. 9F shows that the distribution of Dcluster for the 2000 HW23 secondary clones is also tighter than the C1 members. Both observations can be explained as being due to non-gravitational forces acting on the real objects over the course of the last ∼71 ky. The distributions of orbital elements and Dcluster in Fig. 9 suggests that the C1 cluster is consistent with an origin in the tidal disruption of an asteroid during a tidal disruption event with Mars 70,800 years ago. If true, the C1 cluster is a very young family. In a followup paper to this one we will show that the lifetime of tidally disrupted families created by Mars are as long as ∼1 Myr so if they exist it may not be surprising that we are beginning to detect them. Furthermore, if there is a tidally disrupted asteroid family in the NEO population it seems more likely to be a C-class asteroid and, ceteris paribus, will disrupt more easily since they have a lower bulk density than the S-class. (Richardson et al. 1998). Thus, it is interesting that one C1 member with spectrophotometry, 2000 HW23, may be in the C-class (see §3.1.1). 17 3.1.4 Proper element cluster search We also performed a cluster search with NEO proper elements (Gronchi & Milani 2001). Since the C1 cluster was detected as a cluster in osculating element space it seems plausible that it should also be detectable in proper element space as described in the introduction. A complication arises because our cluster search algorithm uses a 5-element DSH-criterion that incorporates the longitude of the ascending nodes and argument of perihelion (the d3 and d4 terms in eq. 1) while only the proper semi-major axis, eccentricity and inclination (ap, ep, ip) can be calculated for asteroids. Thus, the DSH for clusters in proper element space, Dp, must be smaller than those found using the 5-element DSH with the osculating elements -- Dcluster = 0.002 compared to Dcluster = 0.040 used for the osculating element cluster search. The proper element cluster search revealed that the C1 cluster is not outstanding among NEO clusters. We identified a C1p cluster in the proper element search that has 3 objects in common with the C1 cluster -- 2000 HW23, 2001 PF14, and 2008 LN16 -- and there are 166 clusters with 5 or more members that are bound tighter than C1p with Dp=0.018. The C1p cluster contains two additional objects, 2002 RA182 and 2004 TE18, instead of 2006 JU41. The osculating element DSH for 2004 TE18 and 2002 RA182 calculated with respect to 2000 HW23 are 0.471 and 0.125, much too large to indicate an orbital similarity. We found that the stability of the NEOs in the C1 and C1p clusters is not unusual. We computed the MOID with all the planets from Mercury to Neptune during the secular evolution of 8,650 NEOs (NEODyS, 29/2/2012) according to the dynamical model used in the computation of the proper elements (Gronchi & Milani 2001). Roughly 5% of all NEOs (429) do not cross the trajectory of any planet and ∼ 42% of them (3,636) cross only Mars' trajectory during their secular evolution. The six asteroids in the C1 and C1p clusters are of the latter type. Table 3 shows that all the cluster's members remain far from both the Earth and Jupiter, the major NEO perturbers, during their entire secular cycles. Of the total 3,636 Mars crossing objects we find that • ∼50% of them have min(MOIDEarth) ≥ 0.1 AU, and min(MOIDJ upiter) ≥ 1 AU, • ∼16% of them have min(MOIDEarth) ≥ 0.2 AU, and min(MOIDJ upiter) ≥ 2 AU. Thus, even if some of them are affected by mean motion resonances it appears that many Mars crossing NEOs remain far from close encounters with, and are not affected by perturbations from, the Earth and Jupiter. A close approach with Mars must be very deep to cause a significant perturbation. Thus, there are islands of long-term stability in the NEO orbital element phase space that might 'collect' NEOs in a manner that could mimic the appearance of a NEO family. The Bottke et al. (2002) NEO model can not accurately model these regions of stability because of its low resolution in the orbital element phase space, the relatively small number of objects that were originally used to map out the NEOs' residence time probability distribution, and because it is restricted to just 3 of the 6 orbital elements. 18 4 Conclusions We searched for genetic asteroid families in the NEO population using the method proposed by Fu et al. (2005) based on identifying clusters of objects with similar orbits. We enhanced the method's utility by developing a technique for assessing the statistical significance of the identified clusters using 1,000 realistic family-free fuzzy-real NEO orbital element models. We created our NEO models by cloning members of the known NEO population in a natural way based on the 'distance' between each member and its nearest neighbor. The technique identified three clusters of four or more NEOs among the orbits in the mpcorb.dat data base. None of the clusters are statistically significant at ≥ 3σ and we conclude that there are as yet no identified families in the NEO population. The most statistically significant cluster, C1, contains four objects all with H < 20 and well-determined orbits with the largest member being asteroid 2000 HW23. We performed several additional tests of the C1 cluster's family veracity including checking the members' taxonomic identification, their bias corrected size-frequency distribution, the possibility that they originated in a family-producing tidal disruption at Mars about 71k years in the past, and whether it is also identifiable as a cluster in proper element space. None of these tests exclude the possibility that C1 is a genetically related family but at the same time none of the tests provide sufficient evidence to elevate the cluster to family status. The search for families amongst the NEO population is clearly not as straightforward as the same search amongst the main belt population. Special care must be taken when assessing the statistical significance of a purported NEO family especially with regard to accounting for observational selection effects in the NEO population. At the very least, mere similarity of the orbital elements as evidenced by the DSH criterion being less than an arbitrary and commonly used value like 0.2 is insufficient for deciding upon any genetic relationship between NEOs and, by extrapolation, between NEOs and meteors. 19 Acknowledgments This work was supported by NASA NEOO grant NNXO8AR22G. MG was also funded by grants #136132 and #137853 from the Academy of Finland. We acknowledge CSC-IT Center for Science Ltd. for the allocation of computational resources. Schunova's work was also funded by The National Scholarship Programme of Slovak Republic for the Support of Mobility of Students, PhD Students, University Teachers and Researchers and VEGA grant No. 1/0636/09 from the Ministry of Education Of Slovak Republic. We also thank several colleagues who provided insight into NEO family issues including Kevin Walsh, Giovanni Valsecchi, Alessandro Morbidelli, Patrick Michel, Joseph Masiero, Davide Farnocchia, and Seth A. Jacobson. 20 References Abe, S., Mukai, T., Hirata, N., Barnouin-Jha, O. S., Cheng, A. F., Demura, H., Gaskell, R., Hashimoto, T., Hiraoka, K., Honda, T., Kubota, T., Matsuoka, M., Mizuno, T., Nakamura, R., Scheeres, D. & Yoshikawa, M. (2006), 'Mass and Local Topography Measurements of Itokawa by Hayabusa', Science 312, 1344 -- 1349. Allen, D., Rodgers, C. T., Canterna, R., Hausel, E., Flores, E. & Smith, J. A. (2005), Fun- damental Transformation Equations Between the u'g'r'i'z' and UBVRCIC Filter Systems, in 'Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society', Vol. 37, p. 1210. Bilir, S. & Karaali, S. andTuncel, S. (2005), 'Absolute magnitudes for late-type dwarf stars for Sloan photometry', Astronomische Nachrichten 326, 321 -- 331. Bottke, W. F., Morbidelli, A., Jedicke, R., Petit, J. M., Levison, H. F., Michel, P. & Metcalfe, T. S. (2002), 'Debiased Orbital and Absolute Magnitude Distribution of the Near-Earth Objects', Icarus 156(2), 399 -- 433. Bottke, W. F., Nolan, M. C., Melosh, H. J., Vickery, A. M. & Greenberg, R. (1996), 'Origin of spacewatch small Earth-approaching asteroids', Icarus 256, 406 -- 427. Bus, S. J. & Binzel, R. P. (2002), 'Phase II of the Small Main-Belt Asteroid Spectroscopic SurveyA Feature-Based Taxonomy', Icarus 158, 146 -- 177. Cellino, A., Bus, S. J., Doressoundiram, A. & Lazzaro, D. (2002), Spectroscopic properties of asteroid families, in W. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi & R. P. Binzel, eds, 'Asteroids III', University of Arizona Press, pp. 633 -- 643. Denneau, L., J., Kubica, J. & Jedicke, R. (2007), The Pan-STARRS Moving Object Pipeline, in R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, eds, 'Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI ASP Conference Series #376', Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI ASP Conference Series #376, p. #257. Drummond, J. D. (2000), 'The D-discriminant and Near-Earth Asteroid Streams', Icarus 146(2), 453 -- 475. Fu, H., Jedicke, R., Durda, D. D., Fevig, R. & Binzel, R. P. (2005), 'Identifying near-Earth object families', Icarus 178(2), 434 -- 449. Gajdos, S. & Porubcan, V. (2005), Bolide meteor streams, in 'Dynamics of Populations of Planetary Systems, Proceedings of IAU Colloquium #197', IAU Colloquium #197, pp. 393 -- 398. Gladman, B. J., Migliorini, F., Morbidelli, A., Zappala, V., Michel, P., Cellino, A., Froeschle, C., Levison, H. F., Bailey, M. & Duncan, M. (1997), 'Dynamical lifetimes of objects injected into asteroid belt resonances', Science 277, 197 -- 201. 21 Granvik, M., Virtanen, J., Oszkiewicz, D. & Muinonen, K. (2009), 'OpenOrb: Open-source asteroid orbit computation software including statistical ranging', Meteoritics and Plane- tary Science 44, 1853 -- 1861. Grav, T., Jedicke, R., Denneau, L., Chesley, S., Holman, M. J. & Spahr, T. B. (2011), 'The Pan-STARRS Synthetic Solar System Model: A Tool for Testing and Efficiency Determination of the Moving Object Processing System', Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 123, 423 -- 447. Gronchi, G. F. & Milani, A. (2001), 'Proper Elements for Earth-Crossing Asteroids', Icarus 152, 58 -- 69. Hirayama, H. (1918), 'Groups of asteroids probably of common origin', Astronomical Journal 31(743), 185 -- 188. Ivezi`c, v., Juri`c, M., Lupton, R. & Tabachnik, S.AND Quinn, T. (2002b), SDSS MOC4, in J. Tyson & S. Wolff, eds, 'Survey and Other Telescope Technologies and Discoveries', Vol. 4836, Proceedings of the SPIE. Ivezi`c, v., Lupton, R. H., Juri`c, M., Tabachnik, S., Quinn, T., Gunn, J. E., Knapp, G. R., Rockosi, C. M. & Brinkmann, J. (2002a), 'Color Confirmation of Asteroid Families', The Astronomical Journal 124, 2943 -- 2948. Jacobson, S. A. & Scheeres, D. J. (2011), 'Dynamics of rotationally fissioned asteroids: Source of observed small asteroid system', Icarus 214, 161 -- 178. Jedicke, R., Larsen, J. & Spahr, T. (2002), Observational Selection Effects in Asteroid Sur- veys , in W. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi & R. P. Binzel, eds, 'Asteroids III', University of Arizona Press, pp. 71 -- 87. Jopek, T. J., Rudawska, R. & Bartczak, P. (2008), ' Meteoroid Stream Searching: The Use of the Vectorial Elements', Earth, Moon, and Planets 102(1), 73 -- 78. Kaiser, N., Burgett, W., Chambers, K., Denneau, L., Heasley, J., Jedicke, R., Magnier, E., Morgan, J., Onaka, P. & Tonry, J. (2010), The Pan-STARRS wide-field optical/NIR imaging survey, in L. M. Stepp, R. Gilmozzi & H. J. Hall, eds, 'Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes III', Vol. 7733, Proceedings of the SPIE, pp. 77330E -- 77330E -- 14. Knezevi´c, Z., Lemaıtre, A. & Milani, A. (2002), The Determination of Asteroid Proper Elements, in W. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi & R. P. Binzel, eds, 'Asteroids III', University of Arizona Press, pp. 603 -- 612. Lindblad, B. A. & Southworth, R. B. (1971), A Study of Asteroid Families and Streams by Computer Techniques, in T. Gehrels, ed., 'Physical Studies of Minor Planets', IAU Colloquium #12, p. 337. 22 Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Bauer, J., Masiero, J., McMillan, R. S., Cutri, R. M., Walker, R., Wright, E., Eisenhardt, P., Tholen, D. J., Spahr, T., Jedicke, R., Denneau, L., DeBaun, E., Elsbury, D., Gautier, T., Gomillion, S., Hand, E., Mo, W., Watkins, J., Wilkins, A., Bryngelson, G. L., Del Pino Molina, A., Desai, S., G´omez Camus, M., Hidalgo, S. L., Kon- stantopoulos, I., Larsen, J. A., Maleszewski, C., Malkan, M. A., Mauduit, J.-C., Mullan, B. L., Olszewski, E. W., Pforr, J., Saro, A., Scotti, J. V. & Wasserman, L. H. (2011), 'NE- OWISE Observations of Near-Earth Objects: Preliminary Results', Astrophysical Journal 743, 156. Massi, G. & Foglia, S. (2009), 'Comet disruption: a statistical approach for the nearly isotropic comets', Journal of the British Astronomical Association 119, 203 -- 204. Milani, A., Knezevic, Z., Farnocchia, D., Bernardi, F., Jedicke, R., Denneau, L., Wainscoat, R. J., Burgett, W., Grav, T., Kaiser, N., Magnier, E. & Price, P. A. (2012), 'Identification of known objects in solar system surveys', eprint arXiv:1201.2587 . Morbidelli, A., Bottke, J. W. F., Froeschl´e, C. & Michel, P. (2002), Origin and Evolution of near-Earth Objects, in W. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi & R. P. Binzel, eds, 'Asteroids III', University of Arizona Press, pp. 409 -- 422. Murray, C. D. & Dermott, S. F. (1999), Solar system dynamics, in 'Solar system dynamics', Cambridge University Press. Nesvorn´y, D., Enke, B. L., Bottke, W. F., Durda, D. D., Asphaug, E. & Richardson, D. C. (2006b), 'Karin cluster formation by asteroid impact', Icarus 183(2), 296 -- 311. Nesvorn´y, D., Jedicke, R., Whiteley, R. J. & Izvezi`c, Z. (2005), 'Evidence for asteroid space weathering from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey ', Icarus 173(1), 132 -- 152. Ohtsuka, K., Arakida, H., Ito, T., Yoshikawa, M. & Asher, D. J. (2008), Apollo Asteroid 1999 YC: Another Large Member of the PGC?, in '71st Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society', Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society #71, p. 5055. Parker, A., Ivezi´c, Z., Juri´c, M., Lupton, R., Sekora, M. D. & Kowalski, A. (2008), 'The size distributions of asteroid families in the SDSS Moving Object Catalog 4', Icarus 198, 138 -- 155. Pauls, A. & Gladman, B. (2005), 'Decoherence time scales for "meteoroid streams"', Mete- oritics and Planetary Science 40, 1241. Porubcan, V., Williams, I. P. & Kornos, L. (2004), 'Associations Between Asteroids and Meteoroid Streams', Earth Moon and Planets 95, 697 -- 712. Pravec, P., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Polishook, D., Scheeres, D. J., Harris, A. W., Gal Gd, A., Vaduvescu, O., Pozo, F., Barr, A., Longa, P., Vachier, F., Colas, F., Pray, D. P., Pollock, J., Reichart, D., Ivarsen, K., Haislip, J., Lacluyze, A., Kusnir´ak, P., Henych, T., Marchis, 23 F., Macomber, B., Jacobson, S. A., Krugly, Y. N., Sergeev, A. V. & Leroy, A. (2010), 'Formation of asteroid pairs by rotational fission', Nature 466, 1085 -- 1088. Richardson, D. C., Bottke, W. F. & Love, S. G. (1998), 'Tidal Distortion and Disruption of Earth-Crossing Asteroids', Icarus 134, 47 -- 76. Sekanina, Z. (1970), 'Statistical Model of Meteor Streams. II. Major Showers', Icarus 13, 475. Sekanina, Z. (1973), 'Statistical Model of Meteor Streams. III. Stream Search Among 19303 Radio Meteors', Icarus 18, 253. Sekanina, Z., Chodas, P. & Yeomans, D. K. (1994), 'Tidal disruption and the appearance of periodic comet Shoemaker-Levy 9', Astronomy and Astrophysics 289, 607 -- 636. Southworth, R. B. & Hawkins, G. S. (1963), 'Statistics of meteor streams', Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics 7, 261 -- 285. Valsecchi, G. B., Jopek, T. J. & Froeschl`e, C. (1999), 'Meteoroid stream identification: a new approach - I. Theory', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 304(4), 743 -- 740. Vokrouhlick´y, D., Broz, M., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorn´y, D. & Morbidelli, A. (2006a), 'Yarkovsky/YORP chronology of asteroid families', Icarus 182, 118 -- 142. Vokrouhlick´y, D. & Nesvorn´y, D. (2008), 'Pairs of Asteroids Probably of a Common Origin', The Astronomical Journal 136, 280 -- 290. Walsh, K. J. & Richardson, D. C. (2006), 'Binary near-Earth asteroid formation: Rubble pile model of tidal disruptions', Icarus 180(1), 201 -- 216. Walsh, K. J. & Richardson, D. C. (2008), 'A steady-state model of NEA binaries formed by tidal disruption of gravitational aggregates', Icarus 193(2), 553 -- 566. Zellner, B. (1979), Asteroid taxonomy and the distribution of the compositional types, in 'Asteroids', University of Arizona Press, pp. 783 -- 806. 24 Name C1 2000 HW23 2006 JU41 2001 PF14 2008 LN16 C2 1999 YD 2003 UW5 2008 UT5 2008 YW32 2007 YM 2005 WM3 C3 2008 EA9 2010 JW34 1991 VG 2009 BD 2006 RH120 a ∆a AU ×10−7 e ∆e ×10−6 i ∆i ω ∆Ω deg ×10−5 deg ×10−4 deg ×10−4 ∆ω Ω 2.154 2.123 2.120 2.141 2.463 2.470 2.279 2.319 2.584 2.674 1.059 0.983 1.027 1.063 1.033 1 5 4 5 4000 2×105 2×105 5×105 2×107 3×105 342 53 1 107 107 0.424 0.429 0.410 0.421 0.593 0.577 0.555 0.559 0.617 0.620 0.080 0.055 0.049 0.052 0.024 1 2 0.5 0.2 70 300 400 104 3×105 400 38 10 0.2 48 21 7.76 7.61 6.78 7.82 1.38 1.87 1.61 0.99 0.99 1.23 0.42 2.26 1.45 1.27 0.60 7 8 2 2 12 77 91 125 2×105 56 23 42 55 63 9 245 236 254 261 62 52 33 2 11 190 336 43 25 317 10 2 3 3 4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.8 0.3 30 7 0.1 10 600 47 52 38 36 10 17 38 71 60 240 129 50 74 253 51 1 2 1 2 20 10 10 40 7×104 10 30 10 0.9 0.06 0.4 Table 1: Orbital elements for the members of 3 NEO clusters (C1, C2 & C3) with four or more members. Members of the clusters are listed in order of decreasing size. None of the clus- ters are statistically significant at > 3σ. Data is from the JPL Small-Body Database Browser http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi. 25 Name C1 2000 HW23 2006 JU41 2001 PF14 2008 LN16 C2 1999 YD 2003 UW5 2008 UT5 2008 YW32 2007 YM 2005 WM3 C3 2008 EA9 2010 JW34 1991 VG 2009 BD 2006 RH120 H DS m mag DC DSH ∆DSH ×10−6 m 18.5 19.3 19.5 19.9 21.1 24.3 24.5 25.2 26.2 27.7 27.7 28.1 28.5 28.8 29.5 590 410 370 311 180 40 40 30 180 8 8 7 5 5 3 1,500 1,100 1,000 803 460 110 100 70 40 20 22 18 15 13 9 - 0.041 0.032 0.048 - 0.051 0.044 0.049 0.052 0.026 0.039 0.050 - 0.050 0.049 4 6 4 4 80 3 3 10 1600 170 4 2 270 105 105 Table 2: Absolute magnitude (H), diameter (DS and DC ) and DSH for the members of 3 NEO clusters (C1, C2 & C3) with four or more members. Members of the clusters are listed in order of decreasing size. None of the clusters are statistically significant at > 3σ. DSH and its uncertainty were calculated using the orbital elements and associated errors from www.jpl.org as shown in Table 1. The diameters DS and DC were calculated using albedos of pV = 0.2 and pV = 0.03 corresponding to the mean albedos of S and C class asteroids as reported by Mainzer et al. (2011). 26 name min(MOIDEarth) min(MOIDJ upiter) 2000 HW23 2001 PF14 2006 JU41 2008 LN16 2002 RA182 2004 TE18 AU 0.26782 0.27176 0.23183 0.26740 0.27768 0.26278 AU 2.16112 2.23225 2.18723 2.18886 2.16264 2.23812 Table 3: Minimum MOID with the Earth and Jupiter for the NEOs in the C1 and C1p clusters during the course of their secular evolution. 27 Real NEA population Synthetic model Average for 1,000 real fuzzy models 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 Semi-major Axis [AU] 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 Eccentricity 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 t n u o C d e z i l a m r o N t n u o C d e z i l a m r o N t n u o C d e z i l a m r o N 0.00 0.00 0 0 10 10 20 20 30 30 40 40 Inclination [deg] 50 50 60 60 70 70 80 80 90 90 Figure 1: Semi-major axis, eccentricity and inclination distributions of the real NEO population (solid line), the synthetic NEO model (dotted line) and our fuzzy-real NEO model (data points). 28 N=24 N=10 N=2 N=1 N=1 N=0 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 n o i t c a r F r i a P 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 String-Cluster size Ratio Figure 2: Pair fraction (P F ) vs. String to Cluster size Ratio (SCR) for false clusters detected in the family-free synthetic NEO model when Dcluster = 0.060 and Dpair = 0.058. The area of the filled circles is proportional to the number of false clusters at each P F -SCR combination. Black circles represent clusters with 3 members, red is for clusters with 4 members, and blue represents clusters with ≥5 members. Empty black, red and blue circles represent the quantized possible values for 3, 4 and ≥5 member clusters respectively. It is impossible to have the combinations of P F and SCR on the left side of the figure. 29 Real NEO population Synthetic NEO model Average for 1,000 fuzzy-real NEO models (no discards) Average for 1,000 synthetic fuzzy NEO models 1E-4 1E-4 1E-4 1E-4 1E-5 1E-5 1E-5 1E-5 1E-6 1E-6 1E-6 1E-6 1E-7 1E-7 1E-7 1E-7 1E-8 1E-8 1E-8 1E-8 s t n u o C d e z i l a m r o N 1E-9 1E-9 1E-9 1E-9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 DSH Figure 3: DSH distribution of close NEO pairs normalized by the total number of possible pairs in each population. The solid black histogram represents the real NEO population while the black data points represent the average±RMS of 1,000 'fuzzy' real NEO models (the 'fuzzing' technique is described in §2.4.1). The gray histogram represents the nominal synthetic NEO population while the grey data points represent the average±RMS of 1,000 'fuzzy' synthetic NEO models. 30 10000 10000 1000 1000 100 100 10 10 1 1 t n u o C 0.1 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 Real NEA population Average for 1,000 fuzzy-real NEO models 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.50 0.75 0.75 0.50 0.50 Nearest Neighbor DSH 1.00 1.00 Figure 4: DSH distribution for the closest neighboring objects in the real NEO population and the average±RMS for 1,000 fuzzy-real NEO models. 31 0.060 0.058 0.056 0.054 0.052 0.050 0.048 0.046 0.044 0.042 0.040 >3 3 3 45 2 317 1 C1 C2 C3 r e D t s u c l 0.040 0.042 0.044 0.046 0.048 0.052 0.054 0.056 0.058 0.060 0.050 Dpair Figure 5: Statistical significance of the C1, C2 and C3 clusters as a function of the Dcluster and Dpair thresholds with SCRmin = 0.75 and P Fmin = 0.5. The shaded grey regions mark areas of 3-, 2-, and 1-σ significance for clusters with ≥ 4 members using the fuzzy-real NEO models (see text for details). The star, circle and triangle represent the most statistically significant location of the C1, C2 and C3 clusters respectively. The small black lines on the C1 data point represent the derived errors in Dcluster and Dpair due to the orbital element errors. The long vertical and horizontal lines through the C2 and C3 cluster's data points represent the same errors for those clusters. The white region under the diagonal line is unphysical with Dcluster < Dpair. 32 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 -1.0 -1.0 C O B S V e c n a t c e l f e r e v i t l a e R 300 300 400 400 500 500 600 600 700 700 Wavelength [nm] 800 800 900 900 1000 1000 Figure 6: Spectrophotometry of the C1 cluster's largest member, 2000 HW23, from the SDSS MOC4 by Ivezi`c et al. (2002b) (black points) and the corresponding interpolated and extrapolated data points and error bars at the SMASSII filters' central wavelengths Bus & Binzel (2002) (grey triangles and connecting lines). The synthetic SMASSII data points and lines are offset by -0.02 for clarity. The thin black curves and their adjacent grey curves represent the mean±RMS respectively of 5 asteroid taxonomic types from the SMASSII survey. All distributions have been corrected to solar colors and normalized to 1.0 at 550 nm. The relative reflectances of the C, O, B, S and V types are offset by +1.5, +1.0, +0.5, -1.0 and -1.5 respectively. 33 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 r e b m u n e v i t l a u m u C 18.4 18.4 18.6 18.6 18.8 18.8 19.0 19.0 19.2 19.2 H [mag] 19.4 19.4 19.6 19.6 19.8 19.8 20.0 20.0 Figure 7: Cumulative absolute magnitude distribution of the four C1 cluster members (grey). The thick black curve represents the product of the efficiency function (see text) with the result of the maximum likelihood fit to the SFD with α = 0.23+0.10 −0.08. 34 Figure 8: Panels A-E: Backward evolution of the C1 cluster members' orbital elements from the present (t0) to 100 ky in the past. Panel F: Dcluster evolution for the C1 cluster from t0 to 100 ky in the past. Dcluster was calculated with respect to 2000 HW23 and therefore it does not appear on the panel. Dcluster with respect to 2000 HW23 does not differ significantly from the value calculated with respect to the average orbit of the C1 members. 35 A 12 10 D t n u o C 8 6 4 2 0 2.120 2.125 2.130 2.135 2.140 2.145 2.150 2.155 2.160 0 40 Semi-major axis [AU] B 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 t n u o C t n u o C t n u o C 80 160 120 280 Argument of perihelion [deg] 200 240 320 360 14 12 10 E t n u o C 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 Longitude of ascending node [deg] F 8 6 4 2 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 0.400 0.405 0.410 0.415 0.420 0.425 0.430 0.435 0.440 Eccentricity C t n u o C 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.4 7.2 Inclination [deg] 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.2 8.4 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.03 Dcluster Figure 9: Panels A-F: Orbital elements and Dcluster distribution for the C1 custer members (dark grey) and two sets of 6 secondary 2000 HW23 clones (see text for description). The two sets of clones have ∆ ~vx, or ∆ ~vy, or ∆ ~vz with respect to 2000 HW23 of ±1 m-s−1 (light grey) and ±5 m-s−1 (white) respectively at the time of closest Mars approach. There are only 3 values for the real C1 cluster because Dcluster was calculated with respect to 2000 HW23. The Dcluster values for both sets of 6 secondary clones were calculated with respect to 2000 HW23 that was integrated simultaneously. 36
1607.08237	2	1607	2016-10-06T15:37:01	The population of long-period transiting exoplanets	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.IM" ]	The Kepler Mission has discovered thousands of exoplanets and revolutionized our understanding of their population. This large, homogeneous catalog of discoveries has enabled rigorous studies of the occurrence rate of exoplanets and planetary systems as a function of their physical properties. However, transit surveys like Kepler are most sensitive to planets with orbital periods much shorter than the orbital periods of Jupiter and Saturn, the most massive planets in our Solar System. To address this deficiency, we perform a fully automated search for long-period exoplanets with only one or two transits in the archival Kepler light curves. When applied to the $\sim 40,000$ brightest Sun-like target stars, this search produces 16 long-period exoplanet candidates. Of these candidates, 6 are novel discoveries and 5 are in systems with inner short-period transiting planets. Since our method involves no human intervention, we empirically characterize the detection efficiency of our search. Based on these results, we measure the average occurrence rate of exoplanets smaller than Jupiter with orbital periods in the range 2-25 years to be $2.0\pm0.7$ planets per Sun-like star.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version October 7, 2016 Preprint typeset using LATEX style AASTeX6 With modifications by David W. Hogg and Daniel Foreman-Mackey THE POPULATION OF LONG-PERIOD TRANSITING EXOPLANETS Daniel Foreman-Mackey1,2, Timothy D. Morton3, David W. Hogg4,5,6,7, Eric Agol2, and Bernhard Scholkopf8 [email protected]; Sagan Fellow 2Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA 3Department of Astrophysics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA 4Simons Center for Data Analysis, 160 Fifth Avenue, 7th floor, New York, NY 10010, USA 5Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY, 10003, USA 6Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie, Konigstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany 7Center for Data Science, New York University, 726 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10003, USA 8Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tubingen, Germany ABSTRACT The Kepler Mission has discovered thousands of exoplanets and revolu- tionized our understanding of their population. This large, homogeneous catalog of discoveries has enabled rigorous studies of the occurrence rate of exoplanets and planetary systems as a function of their physical properties. However, transit surveys like Kepler are most sensitive to planets with orbital periods much shorter than the orbital periods of Jupiter and Saturn, the most massive planets in our Solar System. To address this deficiency, we perform a fully automated search for long- period exoplanets with only one or two transits in the archival Kepler light curves. When applied to the ∼ 40, 000 brightest Sun-like target stars, this search produces 16 long-period exoplanet candidates. Of these candidates, 6 are novel discoveries and 5 are in systems with inner short-period transiting planets. Since our method involves no human intervention, we empirically characterize the detection efficiency of our search. Based on these results, we measure the average occurrence rate of exoplanets smaller than Jupiter with orbital periods in the range 2–25 years to be 2.0 ± 0.7 planets per Sun-like star. Keywords: methods: data analysis - methods: statistical - catalogs - planetary systems - stars: statistics 6 1 0 2 t c O 6 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 7 3 2 8 0 . 7 0 6 1 : v i X r a 2 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. 1. INTRODUCTION Data from the Kepler Mission (Borucki et al. 2011) have been used to discover thousands of transiting exoplanets. The systematic nature of these discoveries and careful quantification of survey selection effects, search completeness, and catalog reliability has enabled many diverse studies of the detailed frequency and distribution of exoplanets (for example, Howard et al. 2012; Petigura et al. 2013; Foreman-Mackey et al. 2014; Dressing & Charbonneau 2015; Burke et al. 2015; Mulders et al. 2015). So far, these results have been limited to relatively short orbital periods because existing transit search methods impose the requirement of the detection of at least three transits within the baseline of the data. For Kepler, with a baseline of about four years, this sets an absolute upper limit of about two years on the range of detectable periods. In the Solar System, Jupiter – with a period of 12 years – dominates the planetary dynamics and, since it would only exhibit at most one transit in the Kepler data, an exo-Jupiter would be missed by most existing transit search procedures. Before the launch of the Kepler Mission, it was predicted that the nominal mission would discover at least 10 exoplanets with only one or two observed transits (Yee & Gaudi 2008), yet subsequent searches for these signals have already been more fruitful than expected (Wang et al. 2015; Uehara et al. 2016). However, the systematic study of the population of long-period exoplanets found in the Kepler data to date has been hampered due to the substantial technical challenge of implementing a search, as well as the subtleties involved in interpreting the results. For example, false alarms in the form of uncorrected systematics in the data and background eclipsing binaries can make single-transit detections ambiguous. Any single transit events discovered in the Kepler light curves are interesting in their own right, but the development of a general and systematic method for the discovery of planets with orbital periods longer than the survey baseline is also crucial for the future of exoplanet research with the transit method. All future transit surveys have shorter observational baselines than the Kepler Mission (K2, Howell et al. 2014; TESS, Ricker et al. 2015; PLATO, Rauer et al. 2014) and given suitable techniques, single transit events will be plentiful and easily discovered. The methodological framework presented in the following pages is a candidate for this task. A study of the population of long-period transiting planets complements other planet detection and characterization techniques, such as radial velocity (for example Cumming et al. 2008; Knutson et al. 2014; Bryan et al. 2016), microlensing (for example Gould et al. 2010; Cassan et al. 2012; Clanton & Gaudi 2014; Shvartzvald et al. 2016), direct imaging (for example Bowler 2016), and transmission spectroscopy (for example Dalba et al. 2015). The marriage of the radial velocity and transit techniques is particularly powerful as exoplanets with both mass and radius measurements can be used to study planetary compositions and the formation of planetary systems (for example Weiss & Marcy 2014; Rogers 2015; Wolfgang et al. 2016). Unfortunately the existing catalog of exoplanets with measured densities is sparsely populated at The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 3 long orbital periods; this makes discoveries with the transit method at long orbital period compelling targets for follow-up observations. Furthermore, even at long orbital periods, the Kepler light curves should be sensitive to planets at the detection limits of the current state-of-the-art radial velocity surveys. There are two main technical barriers to a systematic search for single transit events. The first is that the transit probability for long-period planets is very low; scaling as ∝ P −5/3 for orbital periods P longer than the baseline of contiguous observations. Therefore, even if long-period planets are intrinsically common, they will be underrepresented in a transiting sample. The second challenge is that there are many signals in the observed light curves caused by stochastic processes – both instrumental and astrophysical – that can masquerade as transits. Even when the most sophisticated methods for removing this variability are used, false signals far outnumber the true transit events in any traditional search. At the heart of all periodic transit search procedures is a filtering step based on "box least squares" (BLS; Kov´acs et al. 2002). This step produces a list of candidate transit times that is then vetted to remove the substantial fraction of false signals using some combination of automated heuristics and expert curation. In practice, the fraction of false signals can be substantially reduced by requiring that at least three self-consistent transits be observed (Petigura et al. 2013; Burke et al. 2014; Rowe et al. 2015; Coughlin et al. 2016). Relaxing the requirement of three transits requires a higher signal-to-noise threshold per transit for validating candidate planets that display only one to two transits. Higher signal-to-noise allows matching the candidate transit to the expected shape of a limb- darkened light curve, as well as ruling out various false alarms. This is analagous to microlensing surveys, for which a planet can only be detected once, thus requiring high signal-to-noise for a reliable detection (Gould et al. 2004). Recent work has yielded discoveries of long-period transiting planets with only one or two high signal-to-noise transits identified in archival Kepler and K2 light curves by visual inspection (Wang et al. 2013; Kipping et al. 2014b; Wang et al. 2015; Osborn et al. 2016; Kipping et al. 2016; Uehara et al. 2016). These discoveries have already yielded some tantalizing insight into the population of long-period transiting planets but, since these previous results rely on human interaction, it is prohibitively expensive to reliably measure the completeness of these catalogs. As a result, the existing catalogs of long-period transiting planets cannot be used to rigorously constrain the occurrence rate of long-period planets. In this paper, we develop a systematic method for reliably discovering the transits of large, long-period companions in photometric time series without human intervention. The method is similar in character to the recently published fully automated method used to generate the official DR24 exoplanet candidate catalog from Kepler (Mullally et al. 2016; Coughlin et al. 2016). Since the search methodology is fully automated, we can robustly measure the search completeness – using injection and recovery tests – and use these products to place probabilistic constraints on the occurrence 4 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. rate of long-period planets. We apply this method to a subset of the archival data from the Kepler Mission, present a catalog of exoplanet candidates, and estimate the occurrence rate of long-period exoplanets. We finish by discussing the potential effects of false positives, evaluating the prospects for follow-up, and comparing our results to other studies based on different planet discovery methods. 2. A FULLY AUTOMATED SEARCH METHOD To find long-period exoplanets in the Kepler light curves, we search for individual, high signal-to-noise transit signals using a fully automated procedure that can be broken into three main steps: 1. an initial candidate search using a box-shaped matched filter, 2. light curve-level vetting (using automated model comparison) to remove signals that don't have a convincing transit shape, and 3. pixel-level vetting to remove some astrophysical false positives. The following sections describe each of these steps in more detail. The model comparison step (step 2) is the key component of our method that enables robust automation but it is also computationally expensive because we must estimate the marginalized likelihoods of several different models describing a transit and other processes that "look" like transits but are actually caused by noise. This step is conservative: unless a signal is a very convincing transit, it won't pass the test. In practice, this means that all but the highest signal-to-noise events will be rejected at this step. Therefore, in the inexpensive first step – the initial candidate search – we can restrict the candidate list to high signal-to-noise events without a substantial loss in detection efficiency. 2.1. Step 1 – Initial candidate events It is not computationally feasible to run a full model comparison at every conceivable transit time in the light curve so we must first find potentially interesting events. For our purposes, "interesting" means high signal-to-noise and previously unknown. To generate this list, we use a method much like the standard "box least squares" (BLS; Kov´acs et al. 2002) procedure with a single (non-periodic) box. After masking any known transits, we filter the PDC light curves (Stumpe et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2012) using a running windowed median with a half-width of 2 days to remove stellar variability. We then compute the signal-to-noise of the depth of a 0.6 day-long top hat on a grid of times spanning the full baseline of observations. In detail, at each proposal time t0, we hypothesize a box-shaped transit with . (1) duration τ m(t) = µ − δ, if t − t0 < τ /2 otherwise µ, The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 5 Assuming that the uncertainties on the observed fluxes f (t) are Gaussian with known 2, the likelihood function for the mean flux µ and transit depth δ can be variance σf analytically computed to be a two-dimensional Gaussian with mean and covariance given by linear least-squares. This likelihood function provides a natural scalar objective: the signal-to-noise of the measured depth computed as a function of time. In principle this scalar is also a function of duration but we only use a single transit duration because the following steps in this procedure are only sensitive to transits with very high signal-to-noise, and in practice, the final results are insensitive to the specific choice of duration. To avoid edge effects, we apodize this detection scalar near any large gaps in the time series using a logistic function with width equal to one transit duration. Finally, we estimate the background noise level in the detection scalar time series using a robust running windowed variance estimate of the detection scalar. We accept peaks that are more than 25-times this background noise level as candidates. For the Kepler light curves, this procedure yields at least one candidate event in about 1 percent of targets. For these targets, we investigate the three highest signal-to-noise events in the following step. 2.2. Step 2 – Light curve vetting In this step of the method, the goal is to discard any signals that are not sufficiently "transit-like" in shape. This step is similar to the method independently developed and recently published by the Kepler team (Mullally et al. 2016). To quantify the quality of a candidate, we perform a model comparison between a physical transit model and a set of other parameterized models for systematics. In order for a candidate to pass this vetting step, the transit model must be "preferred" to any other model as measured using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The BIC is not the optimal choice for this model comparison, but it is more computationally tractable than the alternatives, such as computing thousands of precise marginalized likelihoods or expected utilities for each model. The BIC can be efficiently computed and it exhibits the desired behavior – decreasing with increasing likelihood but flexible models are penalized – and we find that it performs sufficiently well in practice. For up to three candidate transit times per light curve, we select a contiguous chunk of PDC light curve approximately centered on the proposed transit with no more than 500 cadences (about 10 days) and compute the BIC of each model for this data set. The BIC for a model k in the set of K models is given by (2) where the likelihood function L is evaluated at its maximum, J is the number of free parameters in the model, and N is the number of data points in the data set. BICk =−2 lnL∗ + J ln N For each model, we describe the data using a Gaussian Process (GP; Rasmussen & Williams 2006) with a Mat´ern-3/2 covariance and mean given by the chosen model mk(t; θ) parameterized by the parameter vector θ. 6 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. We consider the following mean models (this list provides a qualitative justification for each model): • transit – a limb-darkened, exposure-time integrated transit light curve, • variability – a pure GP model to capture stellar variability, • outlier – a single outlier to account for a bad data point, • step – a step function to describe sudden pixel sensitivity dropouts (SPSDs; for example Christiansen et al. 2013), and • box – a box to catch signals that are well fit by the search scalar but insufficiently transit-like to be convincing. The functional forms of these models are given in Appendix A and the details of the technical methodology of GP fitting are described in Appendix B. Figure 1 shows representative events that fall into different classes and the corre- sponding maximum likelihood model. For each candidate event, the BIC of each of these models is computed and the event is only passed as a candidate if the transit model is preferred to all the other models. The box model is the most restrictive com- parison, vetoing about half of the candidate events in the Kepler light curves, followed by the variability model. To further restrict to non-grazing transits, we also reject events where the maximum likelihood impact parameter is greater than 1 − RP/R(cid:63). Since the search procedure described here was tuned to discover transit signals, we do not consider the distribution or potential astrophysical nature of any models besides the transit model. In the future, it would be interesting to relax this goal and investigate the other model classes; in particular, the box model is sensitive to astrophysical phenomena, notably occultations of white dwarfs. In a cursory investigation it is clear that the majority of signals labeled box in our analysis are noise; however, a subset are likely to be astrophysical in nature. The reliability of this method of automated vetting is limited by the specific models selected in this step. We find that these are sufficient for the targets discussed below but different target lists or data sets might require additional models to be included for robust selection. 2.3. Step 3 – Pixel-level vetting To minimize contamination from background eclipsing binary systems, we require candidate events to pass a centroid shift test similar to the one used in the official Kepler transit search pipeline (Bryson et al. 2013). To measure the centroid shift, we model the flux-weighted centroid traces independently in each coordinate as a multiple of the best-fit transit model and a GP noise model. By properly normalizing the transit model, we measure the in-transit centroid shift ∆centroid in pixels. We reject any candidate event where the estimated transit location is more than half a pixel The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 7 Figure 1. Representative examples of candidate events flagged by the initial search. Each example falls into a different model category and the figure shows the data as black points and the best fit mean model prediction. The examples represent the following model categories: (a) step (b) variability, (c) box, and (d) transit. −40−2002040hourssinceevent−1.2−0.60.00.61.2relativeflux[ppt](a)stepKIC8631697−40−2002040hourssinceevent−2024(b)variabilityKIC7220674−40−2002040hourssinceevent−0.50−0.250.000.25relativeflux[ppt](c)boxKIC9411471−40−2002040hourssinceevent−1.8−1.2−0.60.0(d)transitKIC85052158 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. from the out-of-transit centroid ∆centroid (cid:19) − 1 (cid:18)1 δ > 0.5 (3) where δ is the observed transit depth (Bryson et al. 2013). 3. RESULTS: A CATALOG OF LONG-PERIOD TRANSITING EXOPLANET CANDIDATES To limit the scope of this paper while still demonstrating the applicability of our method, we search the Kepler archival light curves of the brightest and quietest Sun-like stars for long-period transiting exoplanets. In this section, we describe the target selection process and the parameter estimation procedure. 3.1. Target selection We select the ∼ 40, 000 brightest and quietest G and K dwarfs from the Kepler catalog using the most recent catalog of stellar parameters1 and the cuts used by Burke et al. (2015): • 4200 K ≤ Teff ≤ 6100 K, • R(cid:63) ≤ 1.15 R(cid:12), • data span ≥ 2 years, • duty cycle ≥ 0.6, • Kp ≤ 15 mag, and • CDPP7.5 hrs ≤ 1000 ppm. We continue by excluding the light curves of known eclipsing binaries2 (Kirk et al. 2016), other known false positives (Coughlin et al. 2016), a planet with known transit timing variations (Kepler-9), and four especially noisy stars (KIC 4482348, KIC 4450472, KIC 5438845, and KIC 10068041). The final catalog contains 39,036 targets and the parameter distribution is shown in Figure 2. Since these data have already been searched for short-period planets, we assume that all high signal-to-noise candidates with three or more transits have been previously found (Coughlin et al. 2016). To remove these candidates from consideration, we mask the cadences within two transit durations of the time when a short-period planet candidate is known to transit3. 1 Parameters from the q1 q17 dr24 stellar table from the NASA Exoplanet Archive (Huber et al. 2014, with updates). 2 http://keplerebs.villanova.edu/ 3 We specifically use the q1 q17 dr24 koi exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/. from the NASA Exoplanet Archive http:// The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 9 Figure 2. The distribution of stellar parameters for Kepler targets selected for this search (orange) compared to the distribution of the full Kepler target catalog (black). 3.2. Parameter estimation For each transit candidate, we constrain the physical parameters of the system by fitting a section of light curve around each transit using an exposure-time integrated Keplerian orbit with a quadratic limb darkening law for the central body Foreman- Mackey & Morton (2016). It has previously been established that the orbital period of a transiting planet with only one transit can still be constrained given a measurement of the stellar density and an assumption about the orbital eccentricity (for example Wang et al. 2015; Osborn et al. 2016). Qualitatively this works because the transit of a bound body cannot have an arbitrary period for a given duration. This is the same argument used to justify the "photoeccentric effect" (Dawson & Johnson 2012) and the method of "asterodensity profiling" (Kipping et al. 2014a). In particular, this suggests that the periods of single transits in systems with multiple inner planets will be especially well constrained (Kipping et al. 2012). In this paper, we do not take advantage of the extra constraints provided by the inner planets, instead treating each long-period transiting system in isolation, but this would be a good follow-up project. In the following paragraphs, we describe the components of the probabilistic model used to infer the planet candidates' properties. To perform parameter estimation 450060007500Teff3.64.04.44.8logg10 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. under this model, we use the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) package emcee4 (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2013) with an ensemble of 40 walkers. We run each chain until at least 750 independent samples – in most cases, we actually produce thousands of independent samples – are obtained5 and discard the first third of the chain as burn-in. The posterior constraints on a few physical parameters for the single transit candidate in the light curve of KIC 8505215 are shown in Figure 3 and all the chains are made available online6. Priors - For each candidate in our sample, we take the constraints on the stellar parameters from the Kepler DR24 stellar properties catalog and assume an empirical beta function prior on the eccentricities based on the observed eccentricity distribution of long-period planets discovered using radial velocities (Kipping 2013a). Table 1 lists all the fit parameters and their prior distributions. Besides these listed priors, we add the extra constraint that no other transits can occur in the baseline of the Kepler observations. This constraint is overly conservative because there is some probability that a second transit could occur in a data gap but we find that, in practice, most of the posterior mass is at longer periods and the period inferences are not significantly affected. Likelihood function - As above, we model the light curve as a Gaussian Process (GP) with a physical transit model as the mean, and a covariance matrix described by a Mat´ern-3/2 kernel function. The full likelihood function and some details of GP regression are given in Appendix B. For computational efficiency, we first perform a joint optimization of the physical parameters and GP hyperparameters to find the maximum a posteriori model then keep the hyperparameters fixed and run MCMC sampling for the 11 physical parameters alone. 4. CATALOG OF TRANSIT CANDIDATES Applying the search procedure described in Section 2 to the Kepler light curves of the 39,036 targets selected in Section 3.1, we find 16 convincing transit candidates. Visual inspection of each candidate confirms the reliability of the classification and no candidates are manually removed from the catalog. Of these, three candidates have two transits in the Kepler baseline and the remainder have only one observable transit. The candidates and their inferred physical parameters are listed in Table 2 and the light curves are plotted in Figure 4. The inferred radius and orbital periods of the candidates are compared to the short-period Kepler sample and the Solar System in Figure 5. 4 http://dfm.io/emcee 5 The integrated autocorrelation time is estimated using a robust iterative method as suggested by Alan Sokal: http://www.stat.unc.edu/faculty/cji/Sokal.pdf. 6 http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.58273 The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 11 Figure 3. The posterior constraints on the physical parameters for the single transit candidate found in the light curve of KIC 8505215. The contour plots show estimates of the two-dimensional marginalized probability densities and the histograms show the marginalized density for each parameter. This figure was generated using corner.py (Foreman-Mackey 2016). Two of the shortest period candidates – both with two observed transits – have previously been studied in detail (KIC 8800954 and KIC 3239945; Kipping et al. 2014b, 2016). Table 2 indicates the candidates that were also discovered by earlier searches for long-period transiting systems using visual inspection (Wang et al. 2015; Uehara et al. 2016). The consistency between our results and the earlier catalogs is reassuring. In the light curves of targets with previously known short-period planets, −0.65−0.60−0.55−0.50log10R/RJ0.20.40.6b1.01.52.0log10P/years0.20.40.60.8e−0.65−0.60−0.55−0.50log10R/RJ0.20.40.6b0.20.40.60.8e12 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. Table 1. The inferred parameters and priors used in the inference name mean flux stellar massa stellar radiusa limb darkening symbol log f(cid:63) M(cid:63) R(cid:63) q1 q2 planet radius log RP units ··· M(cid:12) R(cid:12) ··· ··· R(cid:12) reference time semi-major axis & inclination eccentricity √ √ √ √ t0 days a sin i R(cid:12)1/2 a cos i R(cid:12)1/2 ··· ··· e sin ω e cos ω prior log f(cid:63) ∼ U(−1, 1) M(cid:63) ∼ N (M(cid:63),cat, σM,(cid:63),cat) R(cid:63) ∼ N (R(cid:63),cat, σR,(cid:63),cat) q1 ∼ U(0, 1) q2 ∼ U(0, 1) log RP ∼ U(−10, 2) t0 ∼ U(tcand − 0.5, tcand + 0.5)b √ √ a sin i ∼ U(−103, 103)/ a √ √ a cos i ∼ U(0, 103)/ e ∼ β(1.12, 3.09)c ω ∼ U(−π, π) a aStellar parameters and uncertainties taken from the Kepler catalog (Huber et al. 2014) b The reference time is constrained to be within half a day of the candidate transit time c Kipping (2013b) Note-There is one further constraint that complicates these priors: the period of the orbit must be longer than some minimum period Pmin set by the transit time and the full baseline of Kepler observations. our automated search did not find any candidates that weren't previously detected by visual inspection (Uehara et al. 2016) and one candidate (KIC 3230491) reported by the human analysis was discarded as grazing by our search. The Planet Hunters citizen science project (Fischer et al. 2012) reported five long-period candidates with one or two observed transits in our target list (Wang et al. 2015). Of these, we also find two (KIC 8410697 and KIC 10842718) although we find a second transit in the KIC 8410697 system that was previously missed. We do not recover the three other candidates reported by Wang et al. (2015): KIC 5536555, KIC 9662267, and KIC 12454613. The transits of these candidates are all low signal-to-noise and they do not pass our initial signal-to-noise threshold. Six of the candidates in Table 2 have not been previously published. Of the 16 candidates, 5 have known inner planets with three or more observable transits (Coughlin et al. 2016). Given the fact that only 844 of the 39,036 targets had previously known planets, this means that systems with short-period transiting planets are nearly a factor of 20 more likely to host long-period planets accessible by our method than systems with no known inner transiting planets. This difference cannot be accounted for by differences in completeness between targets with known planets The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 13 and without because the average detection efficiency for both populations is consistent within sampling uncertainty. Qualitatively, this suggests that these long-period planets occur with a higher frequency in multi-planet systems or are preferentially aligned with the plane of any inner planets but a more detailed analysis would be needed to make a quantitative statement (see, for example, Tremaine & Dong 2012; Fang & Margot 2012; Ballard & Johnson 2016; Moriarty & Ballard 2015). The candidate in the light curve of KIC 4754460 is an individual transit candidate but another deeper eclipse can be found at a Kepler Barycentric Julian Date (KBJD) of 1587.13; right at the beginning of Quarter 17. This eclipse was missed by the automated search because only the second half of the eclipse is observed. The most likely explanation of this system is that the listed candidate is the secondary eclipse of a binary system but we will keep the candidate in the list and treat this effect statistically in Section 7. Five candidate transit events in the light curves of four targets were rejected because of a significant centroid shift or a large impact parameter. These events are probably astrophysical eclipses from binary star systems that were not found by previous studies of long-period eclipsing binary systems. We do not consider these events further in the following analysis but Table 3 lists these events and their properties for posterity. 5. EMPIRICAL SEARCH COMPLETENESS To measure the completeness of the search procedure described in Section 2, we exploit the fact that transit signals are sparse and rare. Therefore, most light curves contain no transits and we can reliably measure the recovery rate of our method on synthetic transit signals – with known properties – injected into real light curves. This procedure is standard practice in the transit literature and it has been used to determine the completeness of the KOI catalog (Christiansen et al. 2013, 2015) and other independent transit searches (Petigura et al. 2013; Dressing & Charbonneau 2015; Foreman-Mackey et al. 2015). To reliably capture the full structure of the search completeness function, the simulations must sample the (high-dimensional) space of all properties that affect the probability of detecting a transit: the stellar properties (including variability amplitudes and time scales), the planet's physical properties and orbital elements, and any observational effects (noise, spacecraft pointing variations, etc.). For the modest goals of this paper, we only need a robust constraint on the transit detection efficiency integrated across the target sample but, even so, many simulations per star are required. The procedure for measuring the recovery rate of simulated transits is as follows: 1. First, a star is randomly selected from the target list, and the PDC light curve and stellar properties for that star are loaded. 14 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. † r e l p e K / I O K t e n a l p r P 0 7 7 / 8 0 1 1 7 6 1 / 0 9 4 e n o n / 9 9 4 1 2 / 3 9 6 1 2 4 / 4 7 2 1 6 9 . 0 3 7 . 0 5 9 . 0 7 9 . 0 5 9 . 0 0 8 . 0 6 9 . 0 7 9 . 0 5 9 . 0 6 − 0 1 × 7 . 8 e n o n 9 8 9 / / 0 7 8 1 4 7 1 1 1 9 . 0 5 9 . 0 4 5 1 / 5 3 4 0 9 . 0 4 9 . 0 0 0 . 1 9 − 0 1 × 9 . 3 s e t a d i d n a c t e n a l p o x e g n i t i s n a r t d o i r e p - g n o l e h t r o f s r e t e m a r a p d e r r e f n i e h T . 2 e l b a T * q e T K 9 1 3 4 − + 9 2 1 3 3 . . 4 4 − + 8 . 2 4 1 4 0 6 6 − + 1 7 1 5 8 4 3 − + 0 7 1 3 5 1 1 − + 6 0 2 8 6 2 4 − + 5 8 3 9 2 1 − + 3 0 1 9 3 3 4 − + 7 3 1 4 2 . . 7 7 − + 4 . 9 8 1 2 3 3 3 − + 6 2 1 3 4 4 3 − + 9 1 1 2 3 2 1 − + 4 1 1 7 7 4 3 − + 3 5 1 6 8 3 2 − + 9 5 1 3 7 4 4 − + 8 2 1 9 8 3 2 − + 6 6 1 t c a p m i n o i t a r u d i s u d a r s r u o h J R 7 1 1 2 . . 0 0 − + 4 2 . 0 0 1 1 7 1 0 . . 0 0 − + 7 0 2 . 0 7 8 3 1 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 3 9 8 . 0 7 0 3 2 . . 0 0 − + 0 6 . 0 1 2 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 5 1 . 0 9 7 5 3 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 9 8 8 . 0 9 0 1 2 . . 0 0 − + 8 2 . 0 0 0 2 3 . . 0 0 − + 8 2 . 0 3 7 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 8 1 . 0 2 8 7 6 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 9 9 3 6 . 0 6 1 1 2 . . 0 0 − + 3 2 . 0 6 3 3 1 . . 0 0 − + 8 6 . 0 1 6 3 2 . . 0 0 − + 7 4 . 0 1 2 6 7 . . 0 0 − + 5 4 . 1 2 1 7 7 7 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 0 2 . 6 1 4 5 5 5 . . 0 0 − + 2 9 . 5 1 0 7 3 3 . . 0 0 − + 5 8 . 0 1 0 2 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 7 7 . 9 1 4 6 . . 1 1 − + 4 . 9 3 6 8 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 6 0 . 0 2 7 2 3 6 . . 0 0 − + 4 4 . 7 2 3 4 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 6 7 . 5 1 2 2 4 4 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 9 9 4 . 8 0 7 2 2 . . 0 0 − + 1 8 . 1 1 0 3 3 3 . . 0 0 − + 9 4 . 9 8 2 3 4 . . 0 0 − + 4 8 . 6 1 8 2 7 7 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 7 2 0 6 . 0 2 8 9 6 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 4 0 8 . 2 1 7 9 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 6 2 . 0 2 2 2 1 . . 0 0 − + 1 5 . 0 8 1 3 5 . . 0 0 − + 2 9 . 5 3 4 4 4 5 . . 0 0 − + 5 7 . 7 1 3 2 9 9 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 4 1 5 . 0 9 9 3 3 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 6 7 8 . 0 5 6 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 7 6 . 0 3 3 8 9 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 8 2 . 0 8 7 7 0 0 1 . . 0 0 − + 8 9 6 . 0 5 0 2 3 . . 0 0 − + 4 0 . 1 7 7 1 1 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 7 7 2 . 0 4 5 4 4 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 5 5 3 . 0 5 5 2 2 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 6 8 3 . 0 6 9 3 4 . . 0 0 − + 2 2 . 1 3 1 1 2 . . 0 0 − + 3 4 . 0 4 7 2 2 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 6 6 2 . 0 7 6 3 4 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 3 6 1 . 0 5 6 3 6 . . 0 0 − + 0 0 . 2 6 6 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 4 7 . 0 1 2 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 3 8 . 0 0 t D J B K 4 6 1 9 1 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 2 7 6 . 6 6 7 d o i r e p s r a e y 4 5 . . 3 9 − + 0 . 7 8 9 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 4 1 7 8 2 . 0 2 4 6 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 1 2 7 8 2 3 9 . 2 6 6 4 4 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 9 6 3 8 . 6 2 8 7 7 3 3 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 9 8 5 0 . 9 3 0 1 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 1 3 2 1 . 2 4 5 3 3 1 1 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 7 7 6 . 4 8 7 8 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 9 4 0 . 0 4 1 9 9 4 5 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 8 3 5 8 . 7 9 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 5 6 7 . 2 9 4 8 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 8 4 6 5 3 . 1 9 1 1 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 0 1 1 . 4 0 6 9 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 6 7 9 5 . 3 9 3 3 4 6 6 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 6 5 3 . 4 5 5 5 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 9 8 0 8 . 0 3 8 7 7 4 4 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 4 4 3 2 . 6 2 2 6 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 4 7 6 2 . 7 5 6 8 0 . 1 . 3 1 − + 9 . 5 2 2 . . 1 4 − + 0 . 4 4 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 7 9 0 8 8 6 8 . 2 6 8 3 8 − + 4 5 4 5 . . 3 9 − + 1 . 9 9 0 . 4 . 5 1 − + 9 . 9 1 2 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 7 5 9 9 7 2 9 . 1 1 3 . . 1 3 − + 3 . 4 8 6 . . 1 7 − + 9 . 4 3 3 . . 1 4 − + 9 . 4 1 1 . . 2 8 − + 5 . 5 3 5 8 6 . . 0 2 − + 6 1 . 3 2 6 . 0 . 6 2 − + 7 . 2 1 3 7 . . 1 4 − + 3 . 4 p K 6 . 4 1 0 . 4 1 9 . 4 1 6 . 3 1 4 . 3 1 6 . 3 1 0 . 3 1 9 . 3 1 4 . 3 1 0 . 4 1 4 . 4 1 4 . 3 1 9 . 1 1 9 . 4 1 6 . 4 1 5 . 4 1 (cid:63) R (cid:12) R 5 6 0 2 . . 0 0 − + 5 7 . 0 3 5 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 1 7 . 0 2 8 2 3 . . 0 0 − + 3 1 . 1 5 3 1 4 . . 0 0 − + 0 1 . 1 6 5 1 3 . . 0 0 − + 0 0 . 1 3 6 1 4 . . 0 0 − + 8 0 . 1 3 6 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 1 7 . 0 6 1 0 2 . . 0 0 − + 4 0 . 1 4 6 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 6 7 . 0 5 4 1 4 . . 0 0 − + 2 9 . 0 1 0 1 8 . . 0 0 − + 1 9 . 0 5 4 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 3 7 . 0 3 8 1 3 . . 0 0 − + 4 9 . 0 8 6 0 3 . . 0 0 − + 1 9 . 0 4 8 1 3 . . 0 0 − + 4 0 . 1 9 9 0 1 . . 0 0 − + 7 9 . 0 ff e T K 9 2 3 7 1 1 − + 3 1 5 5 6 8 0 8 1 − + 6 8 7 4 8 2 5 7 1 1 − + 6 6 7 5 2 5 8 5 1 1 − + 0 5 0 6 2 7 5 5 1 1 − + 8 1 9 5 3 3 8 5 1 1 − + 2 9 9 5 2 8 0 9 1 − + 7 8 0 5 9 1 2 0 1 1 − + 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 1 1 1 − + 6 8 2 5 0 9 6 0 1 2 − + 2 6 7 5 3 9 4 7 1 1 − + 5 8 1 5 9 3 1 5 1 1 − + 0 0 5 4 3 4 3 5 1 1 − + 9 4 7 5 7 5 5 6 1 1 − + 8 2 6 5 6 9 5 5 1 1 − + 4 5 7 5 1 8 0 0 1 1 − + 8 8 6 5 d i c i k b 8 0 9 8 1 2 3 c 5 4 9 9 3 2 3 0 6 4 4 5 7 4 0 4 4 1 5 5 6 a , c 7 9 6 0 1 4 8 7 5 9 6 2 4 8 b 5 1 2 5 0 5 8 b 5 3 7 8 3 7 8 c 4 5 9 0 0 8 8 7 0 3 6 0 3 9 b 9 5 1 7 8 1 0 1 b 3 2 7 7 8 2 0 1 9 1 3 1 2 3 0 1 8 6 0 2 0 6 0 1 a 8 1 7 2 4 8 0 1 b 4 2 1 9 0 7 1 1 O K e h T † e h T ∗ . r e t e m a r a p h c a e r o f s e l p m a s r o i r e t s o p e h t f o s e l i t n e c r e p h t - 4 8 d n a , h t - 0 5 , h t - 6 1 e h t e t a c i d n i s e i t n i a t r e c n u d n a s e u l a v e h T - e t o N . g o l a t a c ) 6 1 0 2 ( . l a t e a r a h e U e h t n i d e d u l c n I . g o l a t a c ) 5 1 0 2 ( . l a t e g n a W e h t n i d e d u l c n I a b . s t i s n a r t d e v r e s b o o w t s a h i e t a d d n a C c . t e g r a t e h t r o f r e b m u n r e l p e K e h t , e l b a c i l p p a f i , d n a r e b m u n I . o d e b l a o r e z i g n m u s s a d e t u p m o c s i e r u t a r e p m e t m u i r b i l i u q e The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 15 Table 3. The signals rejected with a centroid shift or large impact parameter kic id time depth duration reason KBJD ppt hours 3230491 315.3 9.0 6342758 553.9 8463272 641.0 10.3 35.5 8463272 1206.7 35.5 7.4 9.9 4.8 4.8 impact impact impact impact 10668646 1449.2 5.7 12.4 centroid 2. Planetary properties are sampled from the distributions listed in Table 4 with phase uniformly distributed across the baseline of observations. These properties are re-sampled until the transit is visible in at least one non-flagged cadence. 3. The transit signal induced by this planet is computed and multiplied into the PDC light curve. 4. The transit search method described in Section 2 – including de-trending and all automated vetting – is applied to this light curve with the injected transit signal. 5. This candidate is flagged as recovered if at least one transit within one transit duration passes all the cuts imposed by the automated vetting. The fraction of recovered simulations as a function of the relevant parameters gives an estimate of the probability of detecting an exoplanet transit with a given set of parameters, conditioned on the fact that it transits the star during a time when the star was being observed by Kepler. We will call this function Qdet,k(w) where w is the set of all parameters affecting the transit detectability and k is an index running over target stars. Figure 6 shows the fraction of recovered simulations as a function of planet radius and orbital period based on 819,752 injected signals. This figure shows the transit detection efficiency falling with decreasing planet radius. This is the expected behavior because the depth (and signal strength) of a transit scales with the area ratio between the planet and the star. There is also a slight decrease in the completeness to larger planet radius. This trend is introduced in steps 2 and 3 of the search procedure where the tuning parameters were chosen to maximize the yield of convincing small transit discoveries. The decreasing completeness with orbital period is less intuitive because, on average, the signal strength should increase as the duration of the transit increases. In this case, this simplistic treatment misses two important factors. First, in step 1 of the search procedure (Section 2.1) only a single transit duration is used and second, longer transits are less easily distinguished from stellar variability and they will, therefore, be discarded in the conservative light curve vetting step (Section 2.2). 16 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. Figure 4. Sections of PDC light curve centered on each candidate (black) with the posterior- median transit model over-plotted (orange). The y-axis shows the relative apparent flux of the light curve in parts per thousand (ppt). Candidates with two transits are folded on the posterior-median period. The plots are ordered by increasing planetary radius from the top-left to the bottom-right. −0.50−0.250.00flux[ppt]10321319−1.2−0.60.0flux[ppt]10287723−1.6−0.80.0flux[ppt]8505215−0.80.0flux[ppt]6551440−0.80.0flux[ppt]8738735−3−2−10flux[ppt]8800954−4−20flux[ppt]10187159−4−20flux[ppt]3218908−3.0−1.50.0flux[ppt]4754460−5.0−2.50.0flux[ppt]8410697−4−20flux[ppt]10842718−8−40flux[ppt]11709124−16−80flux[ppt]3239945−4−20flux[ppt]8426957−50−250flux[ppt]9306307−80−400flux[ppt]10602068The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 17 Figure 5. The catalog of long-period transiting exoplanet candidates (green points with error bars) compared to the Kepler candidates (blue points) and confirmed planets (black points; Morton et al. 2016) found in our target sample, and the Solar System (orange squares). The thin black error bars to the left of each candidate indicate the minimum period allowed for each candidate by the prior assumption that no other transit occurred during the baseline of Kepler observations of the target. The vertical solid line shows the absolute maximum period accessible to transit searches that require at least three transits in the Kepler data. This detection efficiency must then be combined with the geometric transit probabil- ity function and the window function. For the star k, the geometric transit probability is given by (Winn 2010) Qgeom,k(w) = = R(cid:63),k + R (cid:20) 4 π2 ak G M(cid:63),k 1 − e2 1 + e sin ω (cid:21)1/3 (cid:20)1 + e sin ω 1 − e2 (cid:21) (R(cid:63),k + R) P −2/3 (4) (5) where R is the planet radius, P is the orbital period, e is the orbital eccentricity, ω is the argument of periastron, R(cid:63),k is the radius of star k, and M(cid:63),k is the star's mass. All of these parameters are included in w. In Equation (4), the term (R(cid:63),k + R) takes grazing transits into account. This might seem counter intuitive because, as part of the search procedure, we rejected candidates where the maximum likelihood model had a grazing transit. However, since the measurement of Qdet,k included a cut on the measured impact parameter, the 110100100010000orbitalperiod[days]110planetradius[R⊕]18 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. Qdet,k term already takes this effect into account. In other words, Qdet,k quantifies the probability that a transit of a given shape will be detected given that it transits at all and Qgeom,k – the way it is written in Equation (4) – is the marginalized probability that the system will transit given its physical parameters. Approximating the window function using a binomial probability of observing at least one transit, we find (following Burke & McCullough 2014) if P ≤ Tk otherwise 1 − (1 − fduty,k)Tk/P Qwin,k(w) = Tk fduty,k/P where fduty,k is the duty cycle and Tk is the full observation baseline for target k. Combining these detection effects, the total detection efficiency is given by Qk(w) = Qdet,k(w) Qwin,k(w) Qgeom,k(w) . So that our planet candidate catalog can be easily used for other projects, we also provide an analytic approximation to the relevant integrated detection efficiency function (6) (7) (cid:90) K(cid:88) Qdet(P, R) = Qdet,k(w) p(w{P, R}) dw{P, R} (8) where p(w{P, R}) is the prior distribution of all the parameters except the period and radius. We find that a good fit to this integrated completeness is given by the function k=1 Qdet(P, R)≈ min[max[a(P ) b(R), 0], 1] 1 + exp [−k(P ) (ln R/RJ − x(P ))] where a(P ) = a1 ln P/ yr + a2 , b(R) = b1 ln R/RJ + b2 , k(P ) = k1 ln P/ yr + k2 , and x(P ) = x1 ln P/ yr + x2 . (9) (10) (11) When fit to the set of 819,752 injected transits, the best fit parameters are given in Table 5 and the approximation is plotted in Figure 7. Note that we do not use this approximation in the following analysis but instead compute the relevant integrals using the injection results directly. 6. THE OCCURRENCE RATE OF LONG-PERIOD EXOPLANETS Using the catalog of exoplanet discoveries (Section 4) and the measurement of the search completeness (Section 5), we can now estimate the occurrence rate of long-period exoplanets. To simplify the analysis, we will make the strong assumption that none of the candidates are astrophysical false positives (the eclipse or occultation of a stellar mass companion, around either the target star or a faint background star). We revisit this assumption and discuss its validity in the following section. As a further simplification, we also neglect the measurement uncertainties on the planet The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 19 Table 4. Distributions of physical parameters for transit simulations name period radius ratio impact parameter eccentricity limb darkening aKipping (2013b) distribution log P ∼ U(log 2 yr, log 25 yr) log RP/R(cid:63) ∼ U(log 0.02, log 0.2) b ∼ U(0, 1 + RP/R(cid:63)) e ∼ β(1.12, 3.09)a ω ∼ U(−π, π) q1 ∼ U(0, 1) q2 ∼ U(0, 1) Table 5. The fit parameters for the analytic approximation to the completeness function parameter a1 a2 b1 b2 value −0.13 0.95 −0.20 0.90 parameter value k1 k2 x1 x2 0.70 3.06 −0.07 −0.91 parameters (including orbital period). This assumption is justified because we are only making high-level measurements of the mean occurrence rate in bins larger than the uncertainties. Assuming a Poisson likelihood, the occurrence rate density in a volume V – defined as Pmin ≤ P < Pmax and Rmin ≤ R < Rmax – is (see, for example, the Appendix of Foreman-Mackey et al. 2014) d2N ΓV ≡ (12) where N is the expected number of planets per G/K dwarf, C(··· ) is the number of detected planets in the volume, and d ln P d ln R C(Pmin, Pmax; Rmin, Rmax) Z(Pmin, Pmax; Rmin, Rmax) = (cid:90) K(cid:88) Z(Pmin, Pmax; Rmin, Rmax) = p(w{P, R}) Qk(w) 1[P, R ∈ V ] dw (13) where p(w{P, R}) is the prior distribution of all the parameters except the period and radius and 1[·] is 1 if the argument is satisfied and 0 otherwise. Using the J injections k=1 20 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. Figure 6. An empirical estimate of the search completeness as a function of planet radius and orbital period. In each bin, the completeness is estimated by the fraction of recovered simulations. The projected histograms show the integrated completeness as independent functions of period and radius. 351020period[years]0.20.51.02.0RP/RJ0.0480.2110.4990.6690.7270.7100.6350.0460.1940.4680.6160.6570.6300.5690.0430.1930.4600.6050.6230.5910.5200.0380.1740.4330.5290.5290.4920.4270.00.30.60.00.30.6The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 21 Figure 7. An analytic approximation to Figure 6 with the same color scale. The contours indicate the 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 levels. sampled uniformly in period and radius and other parameters from p(w{P, R}), J(cid:88) j=1 Z(Pmin, Pmax; Rmin, Rmax)≈ K V J Qkj (w(j)) (14) where the sum is over all injections in the volume V . Using the injection results from Section 5 and the catalog of discoveries from Section 4, we compute the occurrence rate in the period range 2 to 25 years and in two radius bins between 0.1 and 1.0 RJ. The calculated occurrence rates are listed in Table 6. Integrating the two bin model in this range, we find an expected occurrence rate of N0.1 RJ−1 RJ, 2 yr−25 yr = 2.00 ± 0.72 planets (15) per G/K dwarf with radii in the range 0.1 RJ−1 RJ and periods in the range 2 yr−25 yr. This result is qualitatively consistent with the Solar System where there is one planet – Jupiter – in this parameter range and Saturn is just outside the range with an orbital period of 29 years. In Section 8, we compare with similar occurrence rate estimates from the literature. The occurrence rates given here should be interpreted with a few caveats in mind. First, when we inferred the periods of the planets with only one transit, we assumed that the period was long enough that no other transit occurred during the Kepler lifetime. This neglects the small but non-negligible posterior probability – less than one percent for the typical candidate – that a second transit might have occurred in a data gap. All of the candidates in our catalog are consistent with having periods this long but the geometric transit probability decreases quickly with orbital period. For the 351020period[years]0.20.51.02.0RP/RJ0.00.20.40.60.81.022 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. Table 6. The occurrence rate density in two radius bins Rmin [RJ] Rmax [RJ] rate densitya integrated rateb 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.45 ± 0.20 (0.36 ± 0.16) 0.18 ± 0.07 (0.16 ± 0.06) 0.24 ± 0.07 (0.22 ± 0.06) 1.57 ± 0.70 (1.26 ± 0.56) 0.42 ± 0.16 (0.36 ± 0.14) 1.41 ± 0.41 (1.29 ± 0.37) aThe rate density is given by Equation (12) and the value in parentheses is computed assuming one candidate is a false positive (Equation 17). b The integrated rate is computed by integrating the rate density over the bin. Note that the first two rows do not sum to the last row because each row is computed assuming that the rate density is uniform across the bin. Note-These values are computed in the period range 2–25 years. purposes of this paper, we neglect this effect because its rigorous treatment is subtle, but comment that this would only ever decrease the occurrence rate estimate. Second, we assume that each planet candidate transits the star that is characterized by Huber et al. (2014); we assert that each planet does not transit a fainter companion star or a background star. If the planet does transit a companion star, then the companion star must be fainter, and hence denser, causing the period to be underestimated. If the planet transits a background star, it is more likely to be a giant star due to Malmquist bias, hence the density of the star and period of the planet would be overestimated. Either of these scenarios has a small probability, so we expect that our population estimates will stand, while the parameter estimates for individual candidates should be taken as provisional until more detailed follow-up is carried out, including high-contrast imaging, high-resolution spectroscopy, and parallax measurements. Third, we assume that the Huber et al. (2014) parameters are accurate for each star that is transited by a planet candidate, and that each transit is unaffected by blending. Malmquist bias, Eddington bias, and metallicity bias may affect the stellar parameters (Gaidos & Mann 2012), and so we again caution that the individual parameter estimates should be taken as provisional until more detailed follow-up is completed. 7. ASTROPHYSICAL FALSE POSITIVES Various configurations of eclipsing binary stars can mimic the signal of a transiting planet. However, the occurrence rate calculation presented in the preceding section assumes no astrophysical false positives among the candidates identified in this work. In this Section we explore the validity of this assumption. While an eclipsing binary (EB) typically produces a photometric dip much deeper than a transiting planet, the depth of the signal may be comparable to that of a planet if the eclipse is grazing, or if the EB only comprises a small fraction of the total light in the photometric aperture – a so-called blended eclipsing binary (BEB). Additionally, if a binary star has an eccentric orbit, it may be oriented so as to present only a The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 23 secondary occultation and not a primary eclipse, causing a shallow and potentially flat-bottomed photometric dip without an accompanying tell-tale deep primary signal. To determine to what extent the catalog of detections presented in this work may contain such false positives, we simulate populations of detected signals to predict how many we should expect. To accomplish this, we use the Python package exosyspop (Morton & Foreman-Mackey 2016), which we developed for this purpose and utilizes the isochrones, vespa, and batman packages (Morton 2015a,b; Kreidberg 2015) for simulations of stellar populations and their eclipses. With exosyspop one can define the parameters of a population model and generate synthetic catalogs according to the model (and the parameters of a survey) very efficiently. For example, a population of EBs may be defined by a binary fraction, power-law distributions in mass ratio and period (within given bounds), and a beta distribution for eccentricity. This population, initialized with a catalog of target stars (each of which has a duty cycle and total span of observation), may then be "observed," returning a catalog of objects detectable via either primary or secondary eclipse (according to randomly oriented orbital geometries and accounting for observation duty cycle and data span). This synthetic catalog includes signal-to-noise estimates of both the primary and secondary eclipses, the number of detected primary and secondary eclipses, and the trapezoidal shape parameters of each detection (depth, duration, and ingress-to-duration ratio, as defined in Morton 2012). In order to predict how many EBs or BEBs we might expect to detect in this particular search of Kepler data, we first need to choose reasonable parameters for the binary star population. To do this, we calibrate the population parameters using the catalog of detected Kepler eclipsing binaries. We find that a binary fraction of 25% between periods of 20 days and 25 years with a log-flat period distribution and eccentrities distributed according to β(0.8, 2.0) is able to reproduce well both the number and period distribution of observed Kepler EBs between 20 and 1000 days. We thus fix these binary star population parameters for our subsequent EB and BEB simulations. To simulate synthetic populations of EB detections, we assign binary stars to the Kepler target list described in Section 3.1 according to the above EB population parameters. We consider an EB to be detected if it presents fewer than three eclipses (either primary or secondary, but not both), if the signal-to-noise ratio is >15, and the duration of the detected eclipse is <2.5 d. In 100 realizations of these synthetic observations, we see 7.2 ± 2.5 single- or double-eclipsing EB signals. To simulate BEBs, we assume an exponentially varying background field star density across the Kepler field, from 0.005 arcsec−2 at a Galactic latitude b = 20 to 0.05 arcsec−2 at b = 5 (matching up well with the simulations of Morton & Johnson (2011) at many different Galactic latitudes). Each Kepler target star is then assigned a number of background stars drawn from a Poisson distribution with mean given by the expected number of stars to be found within a circle of 4 arcsec radius, given the appropriate density at its Galactic lattitude. We draw the specific background 24 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. stars from a TRILEGAL (Girardi et al. 2005) field star simulation toward the center of the Kepler field. Binary companions are then assigned to these background stars according to the same stellar binary population distribution as the EB population above, and synthetic detected populations are "observed" according to the same rules (accounting appropriately for the diluted eclipse depths in the Kepler bandpass). In 100 synthetic observations, we see an average of only 0.41 detected BEBs. These prediction results suggest that we should indeed expect to see some astro- physical false positives in our search. However, this does not mean that we should fear that ∼7 of the planet candidates might be EBs. In particular, we note that these simulations do not include the full vetting procedure described in Section 4, and it is likely that the three impact-parameter-rejected candidates are EBs and that the centroid-rejected candidate is a BEB. Thus, we might expect maybe two or three additional false positives among our planet candidates. In order to more precisely quantify which of the candidates might indeed be false positives, we can inspect the synthetic observation simulations in more detail. In particular, we can analyze the shape distribution of the different scenarios and compare them with the observed shapes of the actual Kepler detections in order to quantify the probability that each of them may be a false positive. These distributions and the observed shape parameters are plotted in Figure 8. Following the method of Morton (2012) used to compute false positive probabilities for the regular Kepler KOI catalogs (Morton et al. 2016), we can calculate the posterior probability for each of our candidates to belong to each of the three scenarios we consider (EB, BEB, or planet) as follows: πiLi(cid:80) j πjLj Pri = , (16) where the π factors are the hypothesis priors, L are the hypothesis likelihoods, and the sum over j is over all the hypotheses. In this case, we determine the relative hypothesis priors from the synthetic observations, using the mean numbers of "observed" EBs (7.2) and BEBs (0.4), and choosing the expected number of planets to be 12. We calculate the hypothesis likelihoods using the depth/duration distributions of synthetic populations of each scenario and evaluating these distributions at the observed depths and durations of each candidate signal. To estimate the expected shape distribution of the planet scenario, we define a custom exosyspop population of planets according to the two-bin population model described by the median posterior values in Table 6 and generate a population of 1000 detected signals. We list the probability that each candidate is a planet in Table 2. We find that the two deepest signals in our candidate catalog (9306307 and 10602068) are very likely to be EBs, though we note that this result may be dominated by the fact that our planet population is fixed to have a maximum radius of 1 RJ. Most of the rest of the candidates have false positive probabilities below 10%. We do note that as discussed in Section 4, 4754460 (for which we calculate a 5% false positive probability) does The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 25 show a partial deep eclipse right at the end of the Kepler data that indicates that it is most likely an EB. Apart from this, the expected number of false positives among the candidates with R < RJ, according to these calculations, is about one. In light of this result, we demonstrate the sensitivity of our measured occurrence rates on contamination by computing a second constraint on ΓV for each volume with one candidate removed. In this case, Equation (12) would be replaced by ΓV ≡ C(Pmin, Pmax; Rmin, Rmax) − 1 Z(Pmin, Pmax; Rmin, Rmax) . (17) These updated rates are listed in Table 6. In each case, the results are consistent within the uncertainties but the difference can be used to get a qualitative sense of the systematic uncertainty introduced by the false positive population. We note that in the above procedure we have not corrected our predictions for the fact that our search has explicitly excluded KOIs that host known Kepler EBs-if any of these excluded systems show fewer than three eclipses and do not present both primary and secondary eclipses, then they should also should perhaps count towards the number of EBs we should have expected to find in this survey. However, as the Kepler EB catalog does not provide information on whether both primary and secondary eclipses are detected, we neglect this correction. We note that this is a conservative decision, in the sense that accounting for the effect of excluded EBs on our predictions would only further decrease the FPP of the planetary signals, as they would be even less likely to be caused by EBs. Figure 8. Predicted eclipse shape distributions for the two false positive scenerios and exoplanet transits (grayscale heatmap). In this figure, the relative normalization of the maps are arbitrary but the absolute normalization is discussed in Section 7. The green points show the shape parameters of the long-period exoplanet candidates from Table 2. 8. COMPARISON WITH THE LITERATURE The population of long-period planets has been previously studied using radial velocity, microlensing, and direct imaging surveys. These methods all measure the 0.00.51.01.52.0Duration[days]−3.0−2.5−2.0−1.5−1.0log10(depth)EB0.00.51.01.52.0Duration[days]BEB0.00.51.01.52.0Duration[days]Planet26 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. occurrence rate as a function of planet mass instead of radius. Using the transit method, however, we do not directly measure the mass of the planet. Therefore, to compare our results with the literature, we must rely on a mass–radius (M–R) relationship constructed using exoplanets with both mass and radius measurements (for example Weiss & Marcy 2014; Wolfgang et al. 2016; Chen & Kipping 2016) to predict the expected masses of the transiting planets. Table 7 lists gives constraints on the predicted masses of the exoplanet candidates using the probabilistic M–R relationship from Chen & Kipping (2016) and taking uncertainties in the planet radius and statistical uncertainties in the M–R parameters. We compare the predictions with the predictions from Wolfgang et al. (2016) and find similar values with smaller uncertainties and choose to use the Chen & Kipping (2016) relationship because it is more conservative in the relevant range of parameter space. A detailed discussion of the systematic effects introduced by the use of a M–R relationship is beyond the scope of this paper but it is worth noting that all published relationships are based on exoplanets much closer to their host star than any of the candidates discussed here. This effect would cause the masses of these cool planets to be systematically underestimated. Using the same M–R relationship, we also compute the completeness of our transit search as a function of planet mass and orbital semi-major axis. This function is plotted in Figure 9 with the same color scheme as Figure 6. These injections and the predicted masses and measured semi-major axes of the candidates can then be used to estimate the occurrence rate in mass–semi-major axis units using the method from Section 6. One small change to Equation (14) is necessary to account for the fact that the injections were not made uniformly in ln M and ln a. We numerically estimate the prior distribution in mass and semi-major axis from which the injections were drawn p(ln a, ln M ) and Equation (14) becomes Z(amin, amax; Mmin, Mmax)≈ K V J Qk(w(j)) p(ln a(j), ln M (j)) j=1 . (18) J(cid:88) Using this result, we find that the mean occurrence rate density in the range 0.01 MJ ≤ M < 20 MJ and 1.5 au ≤ a < 9 au is d2N = 0.068 ± 0.019 d ln M d ln a (19) where N is the expected number of planets per G/K dwarf. This result and the equivalent result as a function of planet mass and orbital period are listed in Table 8. The uncertainty in Equation (19) and Table 8 does not take into account the uncer- tainties in the mass estimates or any systematic noise in the mass–radius relationship. Therefore, these specific results should be taken with the appropriate grain of salt but predictions in these parameter spaces ease comparison with occurrence rates measured computed using different methods. The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 27 Clanton & Gaudi (2016) studied the occurrence rate of long-period giant planets orbiting M dwarfs by combining results from radial velocity, microlensing, and direct imaging surveys. In the period and mass range 103 − 104 days and 10 − 104 M⊕, they find a mean occurrence rate density of d2N d ln M d ln P = 0.023 (20) per M dwarf with large uncertainty. This result is slightly lower than our estimated rate for a similar range of masses and periods but around G/K dwarfs. This difference is consistent with previous observational and theoretical results that cooler stars host fewer long-period giant planets (for example Laughlin et al. 2004; Cumming et al. 2008; Clanton & Gaudi 2016). Recently, Bryan et al. (2016) studied the frequency of long-period giant planets in systems with inner hot Jupiters based on long-baseline radial velocity monitoring of these systems (Knutson et al. 2014). In this sample, the computed occurrence rate of long-period giant planets was found to be d2N = 0.125 ± 0.012 d ln M d ln a (21) in the range 1−20 MJ and 5−20 au. This result is about a factor of two larger than our estimate (Equation 19) once again suggesting that cold Jupiters might preferentially occur in systems with inner planets – or that the presence of cold Jupiters encourages the formation of hot Jupiters. A recent review of the occurrence rate estimates based on direct imaging surveys (Bowler 2016) reports the upper limit on the occurrence rate of giant planets orbiting F/G/K dwarfs as < 6.8% in the range 5 − 13 MJ and 10 − 100 au. Converted to a rate density, this gives d2N d ln M d ln a < 0.03 . (22) This value is lower than the value computed using our sample in Table 8 but this is consistent with the fact that direct imaging is sensitive to the potentially less common large planets at wider separations than detections with the transit method. As a final comparison, we repeated the analysis of Burke et al. (2015) and fit a double power-law occurrence rate to the short-period Kepler planet candidates7 and extrapolated to the center of the two bins where we computed the occurrence rate. At a period of 7 years and a radius of 0.2 RJ, the extrapolated occurrence rate density is 0.73 ± 0.28 and at a radius of 0.6 RJ, the extrapolated rate density is 0.15 ± 0.05. These extrapolated values are qualitatively consistent with the rates listed in Table 6 but we note that extrapolations and their statistical uncertainties should not be taken too seriously. 7 The analysis was adapted from publicly available code that was demonstrated to reproduce the same results as Burke et al. (2015) by Foreman-Mackey (2015). 28 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. m o r f s e t a d i d n a c e h t r o f s e d u t i l p m a - i m e s y t i c o l e v l a i d a r d n a s e s s a m d e t c i d e r p e h T . 7 e l b a T 1 − r y P / K 1 − s m 1 − s m u a e d u t i l p m a - i m e s s i x a r o j a m - i m e s 5 9 1 4 . . 0 0 − + 0 2 . 0 1 2 . 7 . 2 0 5 3 − + 7 . 3 5 7 9 8 3 . 5 . 0 3 − + 6 4 . 0 4 0 9 3 0 2 . . 0 0 − + 3 3 1 . 0 5 5 5 6 . 1 . 0 9 − + 6 2 . 1 1 1 0 7 . 0 . 0 1 − + 3 7 . 0 2 0 3 7 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 8 4 0 . 0 0 7 4 2 0 1 . . 0 0 − + 3 5 0 . 0 2 8 3 5 . . 0 0 − + 2 7 . 0 4 1 . 8 . 1 8 2 4 − + 4 . 2 2 1 9 2 6 . . 0 0 − + 6 2 . 0 8 9 6 2 0 1 . . 0 0 − + 7 1 1 . 0 1 9 3 6 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 1 4 0 . 0 4 8 . . 5 0 8 9 8 8 − + 4 . 9 8 8 1 2 4 2 . 0 . 0 3 − + 5 2 . 0 2 . 6 1 4 . 3 1 − + 5 . 3 7 7 7 5 . . 0 1 − + 1 4 . 1 0 5 . . 3 0 5 0 1 9 − + 5 . 7 5 1 3 . 5 5 8 . 1 1 − + 5 . 2 3 7 3 7 . . 0 0 − + 7 5 . 0 6 . 2 9 6 . 1 2 − + 6 . 3 5 4 . 9 . 2 8 3 3 − + 8 . 3 3 1 9 2 3 . . 0 0 − + 5 4 . 0 7 4 2 5 . . 0 0 − + 4 5 . 0 2 1 6 1 . . 0 1 − + 9 3 . 1 4 . 6 4 8 . 9 1 9 2 − + 0 . 6 0 1 2 2 8 4 . . 0 2 − + 5 2 . 1 8 2 2 5 . . 0 0 − + 2 6 . 0 2 5 1 2 . . 0 0 − + 3 2 . 0 7 2 . . 3 7 8 9 0 7 3 1 − + 4 . 0 0 1 3 0 . 4 7 2 . 1 3 − + 6 . 2 5 0 . 8 . 6 6 1 6 − + 1 . 8 1 2 7 . . 1 2 − + 4 . 3 3 5 2 2 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 4 6 8 . 1 2 4 . . 1 3 − + 1 . 3 2 5 5 5 . . 0 1 − + 0 5 . 2 8 4 3 5 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 5 2 9 . 1 0 4 . 3 . 7 1 − + 1 . 4 1 1 5 . . 1 2 − + 0 . 4 8 0 . . 1 4 − + 8 . 4 8 6 2 2 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 0 2 4 . 1 5 9 4 0 . . 0 1 − + 9 3 . 2 9 5 6 3 . . 0 2 − + 0 7 . 2 6 5 4 3 . . 0 1 − + 8 5 . 2 1 4 8 4 . . 0 2 − + 3 9 . 2 0 9 4 0 . . 0 1 − + 1 1 . 2 1 7 . . 2 4 − + 3 . 5 6 2 5 6 . . 0 1 − + 4 5 . 2 0 t D J B K 4 6 1 9 1 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 2 7 6 . 6 6 7 d o i r e p r a e y 4 5 . . 3 9 − + 0 . 7 8 9 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 4 1 7 8 2 . 0 2 4 6 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 1 2 7 8 2 3 9 . 2 6 6 4 4 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 9 6 3 8 . 6 2 8 7 7 3 3 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 9 8 5 0 . 9 3 0 1 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 1 3 2 1 . 2 4 5 3 3 1 1 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 7 7 6 . 4 8 7 8 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 9 4 0 . 0 4 1 9 9 4 5 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 8 3 5 8 . 7 9 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 5 6 7 . 2 9 4 8 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 8 4 6 5 3 . 1 9 1 1 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 0 1 1 . 4 0 6 9 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 6 7 9 5 . 3 9 3 3 4 6 6 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 6 5 3 . 4 5 5 5 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 9 8 0 8 . 0 3 8 7 7 4 4 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 4 4 3 2 . 6 2 2 6 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 4 7 6 2 . 7 5 6 8 0 . 1 . 3 1 − + 9 . 5 2 2 . . 1 4 − + 0 . 4 4 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 7 9 0 8 8 6 8 . 2 1 4 . . 6 8 3 8 − + 2 . 4 5 4 5 . . 3 9 − + 1 . 9 9 0 . 4 . 5 1 − + 9 . 9 1 2 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 7 5 9 9 7 2 9 . 1 1 3 . . 1 3 − + 3 . 4 8 6 . . 1 7 − + 9 . 4 3 3 . . 1 4 − + 9 . 4 1 1 . . 2 8 − + 5 . 5 3 5 8 6 . . 0 2 − + 6 1 . 3 2 6 . 0 . 6 2 − + 7 . 2 1 3 7 . . 1 4 − + 3 . 4 s s a m J M 8 4 3 7 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 9 7 0 . 0 1 3 . 8 . 6 3 − + 5 . 6 8 9 7 8 0 2 . . 0 9 − + 0 4 1 . 0 5 3 1 3 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 8 2 0 . 0 2 1 8 8 3 0 . 1 . 0 1 − + 7 5 1 . 0 5 6 . 7 . 3 4 − + 8 . 3 2 2 1 2 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 8 2 0 . 0 9 7 1 3 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 4 0 . 0 2 9 2 3 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 9 4 0 . 0 9 3 . 7 . 4 9 − + 6 . 4 6 6 3 9 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 1 6 0 . 0 2 2 1 2 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 6 2 0 . 0 8 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 0 2 1 0 . 0 6 . 9 1 . 6 3 1 7 − + 4 . 2 6 1 5 2 1 1 . 2 . 0 2 − + 9 1 . 0 4 2 4 8 . 5 . 0 3 − + 3 9 . 0 2 e l b a T i s u d a r p K d i c i k J R 3 2 9 9 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 4 1 5 . 0 9 9 3 3 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 6 7 8 . 0 5 6 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 7 6 . 0 3 3 8 9 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 2 8 2 . 0 8 7 7 0 0 1 . . 0 0 − + 8 9 6 . 0 5 0 2 3 . . 0 0 − + 4 0 . 1 7 7 1 1 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 7 7 2 . 0 4 5 4 4 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 5 5 3 . 0 5 5 2 2 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 6 8 3 . 0 6 9 3 4 . . 0 0 − + 2 2 . 1 3 1 1 2 . . 0 0 − + 3 4 . 0 4 7 2 2 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 6 6 2 . 0 7 6 3 4 0 0 . . 0 0 − + 3 6 1 . 0 5 6 3 6 . . 0 0 − + 0 0 . 2 6 6 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 4 7 . 0 1 2 1 1 . . 0 0 − + 3 8 . 0 6 . 4 1 0 . 4 1 9 . 4 1 6 . 3 1 4 . 3 1 6 . 3 1 0 . 3 1 9 . 3 1 4 . 3 1 0 . 4 1 4 . 4 1 4 . 3 1 9 . 1 1 9 . 4 1 6 . 4 1 5 . 4 1 8 0 9 8 1 2 3 5 4 9 9 3 2 3 0 6 4 4 5 7 4 0 4 4 1 5 5 6 7 9 6 0 1 4 8 7 5 9 6 2 4 8 5 1 2 5 0 5 8 5 3 7 8 3 7 8 4 5 9 0 0 8 8 7 0 3 6 0 3 9 9 5 1 7 8 1 0 1 3 2 7 7 8 2 0 1 9 1 3 1 2 3 0 1 8 6 0 2 0 6 0 1 8 1 7 2 4 8 0 1 4 2 1 9 0 7 1 1 n e h C ( n o i t a l e r i s u d a r – s s a m c i t s i l i b a b o r p a g n i s u i s u d a r d e r u s a e m e h t n o d e s a b d e t a m i t s e e r a s e d u t i l p m a y t i c o l e v l a i d a r d n a s e s s a m e h T - e t o N . ) 6 1 0 2 i g n p p K & i The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 29 Table 8. The occurrence rate computed in mass units volume 2 yr < P < 25 yr; 0.01 MJ ≤ M < 20 MJ 1.5 au < a < 9 au; 0.01 MJ ≤ M < 20 MJ aThe rate density is measured in natural logarithmic units; see Equation (19). Note-These values are computed assuming that the occurrence rate is flat rate densitya 0.046 ± 0.013 0.068 ± 0.019 integrated rate 0.882 ± 0.245 0.925 ± 0.257 in the logarithmic parameters. 9. PROSPECTS FOR FOLLOW-UP A real concern about the detection of exoplanets from a single transit is that follow- up and confirmation is difficult. Since the period of the orbit is poorly constrained and transits are sparse, any prediction of a subsequent transit time will be too uncertain to schedule targeted photometric follow-up (Beichman et al. 2016; Dalba & Muirhead 2016). Instead, follow-up using radial velocity and astrometry are more promising. For both radial velocity and astrometry, there is information about the orbiting planets in measurements made at all times – not just during transit. This allows observations to be scheduled without a well constrained orbital period. Furthermore, follow-up of any of these candidates using radial velocity or astrometry would provide a measurement of the density of a planet that would be valuable for the study of planetary compositions. Table 7 lists the posterior predictions for the semi-amplitude K of the radial velocity signal produced by each candidate using the mass predictions from the previous section. Since the orbital periods are long, we also include a simple prediction for the slope of the radial velocity trend induced by this planet by taking the ratio of the semi- amplitude and the orbital period. Any radial velocity follow-up of the candidates presented here would be an ambitious undertaking because the stars are relatively faint and, in most cases, the radial velocity trends are small. Some candidates should, however, be within the reach of current state-of-the-art facilities. In principle the Gaia Mission will be very sensitive to the astrometric wobble produced by a long-period exoplanet (Perryman et al. 2014). To leading order, the astrometric signal strength is proportional to the semi-major axis of the stellar (primary) reflex motion in angular units. That is, detectability is related to the angle α given by α = a D Mp Ms , (23) where a is the semi-major axis, D is the distance from the observer to the primary, and Mp/Ms is the planet-to-star mass ratio. The single-visit precision of Gaia will vary with magnitude but is expected to be on the order of 40 µas at these magnitudes. In detail the confidence with which an exoplanet can be detected or measured in the final Gaia data depends on this 30 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. Figure 9. The same as Figure 6 converted into the planet mass and semi-major axis plane. Since the completeness function depends on the planet's radius and not its mass, a probabilistic mass–radius relationship (Chen & Kipping 2016) was used to convert radius to mass. 248semi-majoraxis[au]0.010.1110100MP/MJ0.1140.5250.7070.7110.6980.6330.5780.1080.4880.6500.6360.6230.5650.5150.1050.4760.6180.5920.5760.5170.4740.0890.4330.5290.5000.4810.4230.3930.00.30.60.00.30.6The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 31 precision, the number of crossings of the star through the Gaia field-of-view, and details of how the projected orbit is sampled by the time history of the focal-plane crossings. However, it is not expected that Gaia can detect or precisely measure exoplanet-induced astrometric wobbles that are much smaller in amplitude than the single-visit precision (Perryman et al. 2014). The primary stars in the Kepler Field are typically at distances of ∼ 500 pc, and typical mass ratios are in the 10−4 range. We therefore expect astrometric amplitudes in the 0.3 to 3 µas range. These planets will not be detectable or measurable in the Gaia data under any circumstances, but it may be possible to identify which candidates are false-alarms caused by eclipsing binaries. However, similar planets around closer stars will be detectable with Gaia. This means that there will be a comparable exoplanet occurrence rate measurement from the Gaia data. It also means that many of the discoveries of the K2 and TESS missions could be followed up and precisely measured by the Gaia Mission. 10. SUMMARY We have developed a fully automated method to search for the transits of long- period exoplanets with only one or two observable transits in the Kepler archival light curves. This method uses probabilistic model comparison to veto non-transit signals. Applying this method to the brightest 39,036 G/K dwarfs in the Kepler target list, we discover 16 systems with likely astrophysical transits and eclipses. We fit the light curve for each candidate with a physical generative model and informative priors on eccentricity and stellar density to estimate the planet's orbital period. The constraint on the period is also informed by the simplifying assumption that no other transit could occur during the baseline of Kepler observations of the target. Simulations of the false positive population – lone primary or secondary eclipses of binary systems or background eclipsing binaries – suggest that 13 of these candidates have high probability of being planetary in nature. We measure the empirical detection efficiency function of our search procedure by injecting simulated transit signals into the target light curves and measuring the recovery rate. By combining the measured detection efficiency and the catalog of exoplanet candidates, we estimate the integrated occurrence rate of exoplanets with orbital periods in the range 2 − 25 years and radii in the range 0.1 − 1 RJ to be 2.00 ± 0.72 planets per G/K dwarf. This result is qualitatively consistent with estimates of the occurrence rate of long-period giant planets based on data from radial velocity and direct imaging surveys. The occurrence rate measured here – for Sun-like hosts – is higher than microlensing results for generally lower mass stars (Gaudi 2012; Clanton & Gaudi 2014, 2016) but this discrepancy is consistent with predictions from the core-accretion model (Laughlin et al. 2004). Using a probabilistic mass–radius relationship, we predict the masses of our candi- dates and report predictions for the radial velocity semi-amplitudes. Unfortunately, 32 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. since the target stars are faint and the amplitudes are small, these targets are unlikely to be accessible with even the current state-of-the-art high-precision instruments. We also discuss the potential for astrometric follow-up using the forthcoming data from the Gaia Mission with similarly discouraging results. Any detailed analysis of individual systems detected with only a single transit requires follow-up observations to convincingly rule out false positive scenarios and to better characterize the stellar host parameters (with, for example, parallax measure- ments from Gaia). The conclusions of this work – and all other occurrence rate results based on Kepler data – are conditioned on the assumption that the stellar characteri- zation of the target sample is systematic and un-biased. The main population-level results should be fairly insensitive systematic issues with the sample but a rigorous analysis of these effects will be required to come to more detailed conclusions about this population of long-period transiting planets. Our method of transit discovery is especially relevant for future photometric surveys like K2, TESS, and PLATO where the survey baseline is shorter than Kepler. The transits of planets with orbital periods longer than the observation baselines will be plentiful in these forthcoming data sets and this method can, in principle, be trivially generalized to discover these planets, prioritize follow-up, and study their population. All of the code used in this project is available from https://github.com/dfm/ peerless under the MIT open-source software license. This code (plus some depen- dencies) can be run to re-generate all of the figures and results in this paper; this version of the paper was generated with git commit a485057 (2016-09-30). The param- eter estimation results represented as MCMC samplings and the injection results are available for download from Zenodo at http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.58273. It is a pleasure to thank Jeff Coughlin, So Hattori, Heather Knutson, Phil Muirhead, Darin Ragozzine, Hans-Walter Rix, Dun Wang, and Angie Wolfgang for helpful discussions and contributions. We thank the anonymous referee for comments that improved the presentation and clarity of this manuscript. T.D.M. was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, under the Kepler participating scientist program (grant NNX14AE11G), and is grateful for the hospitality of both the Institute for Advanced Study and Carnegie Observatories that helped support this work. D.W.H. was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (grant IIS-1124794), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (grant NNX12AI50G), and the Moore–Sloan Data Science Environment at NYU. E.A. acknowledges support from NASA grants NNX13AF20G, NNX13AF62G, and NASA Astrobiology Institutes Virtual Planetary Laboratory, supported by NASA under cooperative agreement NNH05ZDA001C. The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 33 This research made use of the NASA Astrophysics Data System and the NASA Exoplanet Archive. The Exoplanet Archive is operated by the California Institute of Technology, under contract with NASA under the Exoplanet Exploration Program. This paper includes data collected by the Kepler mission. Funding for the Kepler mission is provided by the NASA Science Mission directorate. We are grateful to the entire Kepler team, past and present. Their tireless efforts were all essential to the tremendous success of the mission and the successes of K2, present and future. These data were obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST is provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant NNX13AC07G and by other grants and contracts. Computing resources were provided by High Performance Computing at New York University. Facility: Kepler Software: batman (Kreidberg 2015), ceres (Agarwal et al. 2016), corner.py (Foreman-Mackey 2016), emcee (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2013), exosyspop (Morton & Foreman-Mackey 2016), george (Ambikasaran et al. 2016), isochrones (Morton 2015a), matplotlib (Hunter et al. 2007), numpy (Van Der Walt et al. 2011), scipy (Jones et al. 2001), transit (Foreman-Mackey & Morton 2016), vespa (Morton 2015b). 34 Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. APPENDIX A. DETAILS OF THE LIGHT CURVE MODELS In Section 2.2, the five light curve models were listed. In this section, we give the mathematical details of each model and list the parameters that are fit. Each model – except the transit model – can be easily differentiated with respect to its parameters. As discussed in the following section, this feature is crucial for efficient and robust likelihood maximization. • The box model is given by mbox(t) = a, if t ≤ tmin b, if tmin < t ≤ tmax c, if tmax < t (A1) (A2) (A3) where a, b, and c are free parameters, and tmin and tmax are fixed. In practice, we include two different box models where tmin and tmax are set using different heuristics. The first box has the bounds set to match the ingress and egress of the best fit transit. The second box is chosen based on the largest change points in the light curve. • The step model is given by m1 + h1 exp ([t − t0]/w1) , if t < t0 m2 + h2 exp ([t0 − t]/w2) , if t0 ≤ t mstep(t) = where all of the parameters – including t0 – are included in the fit. To ensure that the widths w1 and w2 remain positive, we fit for log w1 and log w2. • For the outlier model, we iterate through all cadences tn within 0.3 days of the candidate transit time and evaluate the model as f (t0), moutlier(t) = if t = t0 median[f (t (cid:54)= t0)], if t (cid:54)= t0 where f (t) is the observed time series. With this model, no non-linear optimization is required and the final value of t0 is the one with the maximum likelihood in this grid search. • The variability model only has one parameter, the flux m0 and mvariability(t) = m0 at all times. The variability is captured by the Gaussian Process residual model. • Finally, the transit model is an exposure time integrated, limb darkened light curve (Mandel & Agol 2002; Kipping 2010) parameterized by the radius ratio between the planet and star, the transit duration, the transit time, the impact parameter, The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 35 and two quadratic limb darkening coefficients (Kipping 2013a). Analytically computing the gradient of a simple transit model is possible (P´al 2008) but it becomes substantially more tedious as the model becomes more realistic. There- fore, we instead use a compile-time automatic differentiation library8 (Agarwal et al. 2016) to efficiently compute first derivatives of the full transit model with respect to the orbital and physical parameters to machine precision. B. GAUSSIAN PROCESS REGRESSION Gaussian Processes (GPs) are a class of non-parametric, stochastic models that have been demonstrated to be good effective models for the variability in Kepler light curves. A simple GP model can be used to capture residual non-transit variability in light curves. In this paper, we use a GP model for two steps: light curve–level transit shape vetting and parameter estimation. A full discussion of GPs is beyond the scope of this paper, so we will only summarize the most relevant points here and direct an interested reader to Rasmussen & Williams (2006) for more details. A GP model is specified by the following likelihood function L = ln p(y θ, α) =−1 2 r(θ)T K(α)−1 r(θ) − 1 2 log det K(α) − N 2 log 2 π (B4) where y is a list of measurements in a scalar time series – in this case, fluxes – measured at the times t, and r(θ) = y − m(t; θ) is the vector of residuals away from the mean model m(t; θ). For the purposes of this paper, we model the covariance matrix K(α) using the Mat´ern-3/2 kernel. Under this model, the elements of K(α) are given by [K(α)]ij = σ2 i δij + α2 1 + (cid:20) (cid:21) (cid:18) ti − tj√ 3 τ exp −ti − tj√ 3 τ (cid:19) (B5) (B6) where σi is the reported uncertainty on the i-th measurement in the time series and δij is the Kronecker delta. This covariance function (Equation B6) is specified by an amplitude α and a time scale τ and we will simultaneously fit for these hyperparameters α = (α, τ ) and the parameters of the mean model θ. To efficiently find the parameter set that maximizes Equation (B4) using a non-linear optimization routine9, it is useful to be able to compute the gradient of Equation (B4) with respect to the parameters θ and α. These gradients are given by d ln p(y θ, α) dθ = dm(t; θ) T dθ K(α)−1 r(θ) (B7) 8 More specifically, we use the Jet object from the BSD-licensed Ceres Solver http:// ceres-solver.org 9 We use the L-BFGS-B method as implemented in SciPy http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/ reference/generated/scipy.optimize.minimize.html. 36 and where Foreman-Mackey, Morton, Hogg, et al. (cid:18)(cid:2)φ φT − K(α)−1(cid:3) dK(α) dα d ln p(y θ, α) dα = 1 2 Tr φ = K(α)−1 r(θ) . REFERENCES (cid:19) (B8) (B9) Agarwal, S., Mierle, K., & et al. 2016, Ceres Foreman-Mackey, D. 2015, An experiment in Solver, http://ceres-solver.org, , Ambikasaran, S., Foreman-Mackey, D., Greengard, L., Hogg, D., & O Neil, M. 2016, IEEE Ballard, S., & Johnson, J. A. 2016, ApJ, 816, 66 open science: exoplanet population inference, http://dfm.io/posts/exopop/, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.57218 -. 2016, The Journal of Open Source Software, 24, doi:10.21105/joss.00024 Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., Beichman, C., Livingston, J., Werner, M., et al. & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306 2016, ApJ, 822, 39 Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., & Morton, Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G., et al. T. D. 2014, ApJ, 795, 64 2011, ApJ, 736, 19 Bowler, B. P. 2016, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1605.02731 Bryan, M. L., Knutson, H. A., Howard, A. W., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 89 Bryson, S. T., Jenkins, J. M., Gilliland, R. L., et al. 2013, PASP, 125, 889 Burke, C. J., & McCullough, P. R. 2014, ApJ, 792, 79 Burke, C. J., Bryson, S. T., Mullally, F., et al. 2014, ApJS, 210, 19 Foreman-Mackey, D., Montet, B. T., Hogg, D. W., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 215 Foreman-Mackey, D., & Morton, T. 2016, dfm/transit: v0.3.0, , , doi:10.5281/zenodo.159478 Gaidos, E., & Mann, A. W. 2012, ApJ, 762, 41 Gaudi, B. S. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 411 Girardi, L., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Hatziminaoglou, E., & da Costa, L. 2005, A&A, 436, 895 Gould, A., Gaudi, B. S., & Han, C. 2004, Burke, C. J., Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 8 ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0405217 Cassan, A., Kubas, D., Beaulieu, J.-P., et al. Gould, A., Dong, S., Gaudi, B. S., et al. 2010, 2012, Nature, 481, 167 ApJ, 720, 1073 Chen, J., & Kipping, D. M. 2016, ArXiv Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., e-prints, arXiv:1603.08614 et al. 2012, ApJS, 201, 15 Christiansen, J. L., Clarke, B. D., Burke, C. J., Howell, S. B., Sobeck, C., Haas, M., et al. et al. 2013, ApJS, 207, 35 -. 2015, ApJ, 810, 95 Clanton, C., & Gaudi, B. S. 2014, ApJ, 791, 91 -. 2016, ApJ, 819, 125 Coughlin, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., et al. 2016, ApJS, 224, 12 Cumming, A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2008, PASP, 120, 531 Dalba, P. A., & Muirhead, P. S. 2016, ApJL, 826, L7 Dalba, P. A., Muirhead, P. S., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 154 2014, PASP, 126, 398 Huber, D., Silva Aguirre, V., Matthews, J. M., et al. 2014, ApJS, 211, 2 Hunter, J. D., et al. 2007, Computing in science and engineering, 9, 90 Jones, E., Oliphant, T., Peterson, P., et al. 2001, SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python, , Kipping, D. M. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 1758 -. 2013a, MNRAS, 435, 2152 -. 2013b, MNRAS, 434, L51 Kipping, D. M., Bastien, F. A., Stassun, K. G., Dawson, R. I., & Johnson, J. A. 2012, ApJ, et al. 2014a, ApJL, 785, L32 756, 122 Dressing, C. D., & Charbonneau, D. 2015, ApJ, 807, 45 Fang, J., & Margot, J.-L. 2012, ApJ, 761, 92 Fischer, D. A., Schwamb, M. E., Schawinski, K., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2900 Kipping, D. M., Dunn, W. R., Jasinski, J. M., & Manthri, V. P. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1166 Kipping, D. M., Torres, G., Buchhave, L. A., et al. 2014b, ApJ, 795, 25 Kipping, D. M., Torres, G., Henze, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 112 The population of long-period transiting exoplanets 37 Kirk, B., Conroy, K., Prsa, A., et al. 2016, AJ, Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. 2006, 151, 68 Knutson, H. A., Fulton, B. J., Montet, B. T., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 126 Kov´acs, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 2002, A&A, 391, 369 Kreidberg, L. 2015, PASP, 127, 1161 Laughlin, G., Bodenheimer, P., & Adams, F. C. 2004, ApJL, 612, L73 Mandel, K., & Agol, E. 2002, ApJL, 580, L171 Moriarty, J., & Ballard, S. 2015, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1512.03445 Morton, T., & Foreman-Mackey, D. 2016, timothydmorton/exosyspop: v0.1-alpha, , , doi:10.5281/zenodo.159487 Morton, T. D. 2012, ApJ, 761, 6 -. 2015a, isochrones: Stellar model grid package, Astrophysics Source Code Library, , , ascl:1503.010 -. 2015b, VESPA: False positive probabilities calculator, Astrophysics Source Code Library, , , ascl:1503.011 Morton, T. D., Bryson, S. T., Coughlin, J. L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 822, 86 Morton, T. D., & Johnson, J. A. 2011, ApJ, 738, 170 Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., & Apai, D. 2015, ApJ, 814, 130 Mullally, F., Coughlin, J. L., Thompson, S. E., et al. 2016, PASP, 128, 074502 Osborn, H. P., Armstrong, D. J., Brown, D. J. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 2273 P´al, A. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 281 Perryman, M., Hartman, J., Bakos, G. ´A., & Lindegren, L. 2014, ApJ, 797, 14 Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., & Marcy, G. W. 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 110, 19273 Gaussian processes for machine learning (MIT Press) Rauer, H., Catala, C., Aerts, C., et al. 2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249 Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003 Rogers, L. A. 2015, ApJ, 801, 41 Rowe, J. F., Coughlin, J. L., Antoci, V., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 16 Shvartzvald, Y., Maoz, D., Udalski, A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4089 Smith, J. C., Stumpe, M. C., Van Cleve, J. E., et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 1000 Stumpe, M. C., Smith, J. C., Van Cleve, J. E., et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 985 Tremaine, S., & Dong, S. 2012, AJ, 143, 94 Uehara, S., Kawahara, H., Masuda, K., Yamada, S., & Aizawa, M. 2016, ApJ, 822, 2 Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 22 Wang, J., Fischer, D. A., Barclay, T., et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, 10 -. 2015, ApJ, 815, 127 Weiss, L. M., & Marcy, G. W. 2014, ApJL, 783, L6 Winn, J. N. 2010, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1001.2010 Wolfgang, A., Rogers, L. A., & Ford, E. B. 2016, ApJ, 825, 19 Yee, J. C., & Gaudi, B. S. 2008, ApJ, 688, 616
1612.02231	1	1612	2016-12-07T12:52:57	The temporal evolution of exposed water ice-rich areas on the surface of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: spectral analysis	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Water ice-rich patches have been detected on the surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko by the VIRTIS hyperspectral imager on-board the Rosetta spacecraft, since the orbital insertion in late August 2014. Among those, three icy patches have been selected, and VIRTIS data are used to analyse their properties and their temporal evolution while the comet was moving towards the Sun. We performed an extensive analysis of the spectral parameters, and we applied the Hapke radiative transfer model to retrieve the abundance and grain size of water ice, as well as the mixing modalities of water ice and dark terrains on the three selected water ice rich areas. Study of the spatial distribution of the spectral parameters within the ice-rich patches has revealed that water ice follows different patterns associated to a bimodal distribution of the grains: ~50 {\mu}m sized and ~2000 {\mu}m sized. In all three cases, after the first detections at about 3.5 AU heliocentric distance, the spatial extension and intensity of the water ice spectral features increased, it reached a maximum after 60-100 days at about 3.0 AU, and was followed by an approximately equally timed decrease and disappearanceat about ~2.2 AU, before perihelion. The behaviour of the analysed patches can be assimilated to a seasonal cycle. In addition we found evidence of short-term variability associated to a diurnal water cycle. The similar lifecycle of the three icy regions indicates that water ice is uniformly distributed in the subsurface layers, and no large water ice reservoirs are present.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The temporal evolution of exposed water ice-rich areas on the surface of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: spectral analysis. A. Raponi1, M. Ciarniello1, F. Capaccioni1, G. Filacchione1, F. Tosi1, M. C. De Sanctis1, M.T. Capria1, M. A. Barucci2, A. Longobardo1, E. Palomba1, D. Kappel3, G. Arnold3, S. Mottola3, B. Rousseau2, E. Quirico4, G. Rinaldi1, S. Erard2, D. Bockelee-Morvan2, C. Leyrat2 1IAPS-INAF, via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, Rome 00133, Italy 2LESIA, Observatoire de Paris/CNRS/Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Université Paris-Diderot, Meudon, France 3Institute for Planetary Research, Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Berlin, Germany 4Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, Grenoble, France Abstract. Water ice-rich patches have been detected on the surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko by the VIRTIS hyperspectral imager on-board the Rosetta spacecraft, since the orbital insertion in late August 2014. Among those, three icy patches have been selected, and VIRTIS data are used to analyse their properties and their temporal evolution while the comet was moving towards the Sun. We performed an extensive analysis of the spectral parameters, and we applied the Hapke radiative transfer model to retrieve the abundance and grain size of water ice, as well as the mixing modalities of water ice and dark terrains on the three selected water ice rich areas. Study of the spatial distribution of the spectral parameters within the ice-rich patches has revealed that water ice follows different patterns associated to a bimodal distribution of the grains: ~50 μm sized and ~2000 μm sized. In all three cases, after the first detections at about 3.5 AU heliocentric distance, the spatial extension and intensity of the water ice spectral features increased, it reached a maximum after 60-100 days at about 3.0 AU, and was followed by an approximately equally timed decrease and disappearance at about ~2.2 AU, before perihelion. The behaviour of the analysed patches can be assimilated to a seasonal cycle. In addition we found evidence of short-term variability associated to a diurnal water cycle. The similar lifecycle of the three icy regions indicates that water ice is uniformly distributed in the subsurface layers, and no large water ice reservoirs are present. Introduction Comets are primordial bodies, which played a key role in the early phases of solar system formation contributing to the accretion of the giant planets as well as potentially contributing volatiles to the terrestrial planets (A'Hearn et al., 2011a). Water is the most abundant volatile species in comets as demonstrated by long-term studies of cometary comae (e.g. Bockelée- Morvan and Rickman, 1997; Bockelée-Morvan et al., 2004; Feaga et al., 2007; Mumma and Charnley, 2011). Water was assembled, presumably, as amorphous ice within the cometesimal, as a consequence of the very low formation temperatures of the icy grains. Evolution of the surface, and of the ice therein contained, of Jupiter Family Comets (JFC) is driven by their periodic passages close to the Sun. The surface is modified by sublimation of volatiles leading to surface erosion, which causes material's loss up to tens of meters at each perihelion passage, and by heating, which alters the structure of the upper layers of the nucleus to a depth determined by the thermal skin depth. In summary, at each periodic passage within the inner Solar System, primordial water ice is subjected to evolutionary processes such as phase transition, sublimation, re-condensation, sintering. Amorphous ice is likely not observable directly at the surface of a cometary nucleus at close distances to the Sun as it undergoes a phase transition with an activation temperature of 120 K, which transforms amorphous ice into crystalline ice. The study of the state of water ice (crystalline Vs. amorphous, grain size, presence of clathrates, etc.) at the surface of a cometary nucleus can provide some insight into the processes that have led to its evolution. The properties investigated by the present work are: abundance, grain size, and mixing modalities of the ice with the refractory dark material of comet. Hereafter, the abundance is intended as the total cross section of the icy grains as a fraction of the area subtended by the pixel. The grain size is the physical diameter of the spherical grain, as in Hapke (2012). The mixing modalities are assumed to be either intimate or areal. In the intimate mixing the grains of the ice and dark terrain are in contact each other. In the areal mixing the ice is present in form of patches on the surface. A first insight on the properties cometary water ice was provided by the in situ observations carried out by the Deep Impact mission to 9P/Tempel 1 (A'Hearn et al., 2005) and its investigation of 103P/Hartley 2 during the extended mission (A'Hearn et al., 2011b). However, a real breakthrough was represented by the Rosetta mission to the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (hereafter referred to as 67P) which carried out the most complete set of observations, performing the first escort and soft landing on a comet. The more diffuse form in which the water ice has been detected in different comets is a population of pure and very fine grains (~1 μm in diameter) of crystalline ice: - Ground observation of the large and infrequent outbursts of comet 17P/Holmes revealed pure and fine water ice grains (Yang et al., 2009); - The material excavated and ejected from 10 to 20-m depths from comet 9P/Tempel 1 by the impactor released by the Deep Impact spacecraft has been modelled with 1 μm pure water ice grains (Sunshine et al., 2007); - The innermost coma of the hyperactive comet 103P/Hartley 2 has been found to be populated by 1 μm sized grains, which are components of most massive aggregates dragged out continuously by gaseous CO2 (Protopapa et al., 2014); - Observations, by the VIRTIS instrument (Coradini et al., 2007) on-board the Rosetta spacecraft, of the neck region on the surface of 67P revealed fine grains (1-2 μm) intimately mixed with the predominant dark terrain, which has been suggested to be the result of a diurnal sublimation- recondensation cycle (De Sanctis et al., 2015); - An increasing exposure of fine grains (1-2 μm) of water ice on 67P observed after the gradual removal of the surficial dust layer by the gaseous activity, before perihelion (Filacchione et al., 2016b; Ciarniello et al., submitted). However, there is at least another form of cometary water ice: in some specific and small areas on the surface of comets it has been observed in form of patches with coarser grain sizes (> 30 μm). Specifically: - On the surface of comet Tempel 1 water ice has been detected by the HRI spectrometer onboard the Deep Impact spacecraft in three regions covering a total area of 0.5 km2. The icy areas have been modeled with a few percent of water ice constituted by 30 μm sized grains, in areal mixture with the dark terrain of the comet (Sunshine et al., 2006), and by up to 1%, with 30 or 70 μm sized grains, in areal or intimate mixture, respectively (Raponi et al., 2013); - On the southern hemisphere of 67P icy patches have been detected in correspondence of two debris falls. Spectral modelling has revealed a bimodal distribution of grains: ~50 μm sized and ~2000 μm sized, respectively in intimate and areal mixture with the dark refractory material of the comet (Filacchione et al., 2016a); - Other dozen small patches or cluster of spots spread over the entire surface of 67P, and covering up to few hundred square meters each one, have been detected by OSIRIS (Keller et al., 2007) and VIRTIS instruments on board the Rosetta spacecraft (Pommerol et al., 2015, Barucci et al., 2016). In order to have an overall view of the physical state and processes of water ice on comets, intrinsic differences between the comets observed, in terms of composition, activity and surface morphology must be taken into account. The evolution of comets is then subjected to seasonal effects, related to the total solar input received by the comets along an entire orbit, and to short term processes, attributable to the instantaneous solar input. The analysis of the continuous evolution in time of the water ice on the surface of comets was not possible before the Rosetta mission, because all the previous space missions performed scientific measurements during only relatively short flybys. It is worth noting that one example existed, before Rosetta, of a long term analysis of a surface of a comet thanks to Stardust-NEXT which on 14 February 2011 flew past 9P/Tempel 1 showing evident differences in some geological features with respect to the first flyby of the Deep Impact spacecraft on 4 July 2005 (Veverka, 2012). The Rosetta mission has provided the first ever escort of a comet along its orbit around the Sun, allowing us to follow the orbital evolution of the surface during the perihelion passage. The aim of the present work is the analysis of the water ice patches on the surface of 67P showing the presence of coarser grains, which have been suggested as more stable in time (Filacchione et al., 2016a; Barucci et al., 2016). In particular, here we focus on the spectral parameters, the physical properties, and their evolution in time, using the hyperspectral data acquired by the VIRTIS instrument on-board Rosetta. The VIRTIS (Visible InfraRed and Thermal Imaging Spectrometer) instrument is described in detail by Coradini et al. (2007); summarizing, VIRTIS is composed of a high spectral resolution channel (VIRTIS-H) and a hyperspectral mapper (VIRTIS-M) covering the spectral range 0.22 - 1.04 μm (VIRTIS-M-VIS) and 0.95 - 5.06 μm (VIRTIS-M-IR) with two detectors both with 432 spectral bands. The present work takes advantage of the data acquired simultaneously by VIS and IR channels of the VIRTIS-M instrument. Dataset description We have taken into account all the water ice patches discussed by Filacchione et al. (2016a) and by Barucci et al. (2016). We run a search in the full VIRTIS observations database to retrieve all observations covering the regions where icy patches were observed. The acquisitions with unfavourable viewing geometry (incidence or emission angle > 70°), or with limited spatial coverage were discarded. The patches with a limited temporal coverage were also discarded. In addition, all pixels in shadow were excluded from the analysis. Our final selection included three large patches: the "BAPs" (bright albedo patches) discussed by Filacchione et al. (2015): BAP1 (longitude: 118°E, latitude: 13°N), BAP2 (longitude: 180°E, latitude: -4°N), and the "SPOT 6" (longitude: 72°E, latitude: 3°N) discussed by Barucci et al. (2016). The surface portions that are related to patches are covered by ~50 - ~5000 pixels respectively from the least to the highest resolved acquisitions. The measured spectra have been cleaned from artifacts and spikes (Raponi, 2014). The VIS and IR channels have been co-registered to bridge the spectra of the two channels. The VIRTIS-M dataset considered in this work is summarized in Tables 1, 2, and 3. Spacecraft clock time Resolution (m/px) Local solar Average incidence angle (°) Average emission angle (°) Average phase angle (°) Days from 2 Sept 2014 Helio centric (first acquisition) distance (AU) 12.7 14.0 7.1 2.2 4.4 5.8 7.3 7.2 20.4 368245714 368291071 369364114 371998843 373202012 373248812 375524971 375613471 383518966 Table 1. Dataset selected for BAP 1: The first column indicates the spacecraft clock time which is also the name of the acquisition. The diverse resolutions are due to the different distance of the spacecraft from the comet surface at the time of the acquisitions. The column "local solar time" is defined according to the longitude position, and it is in hour unit, being the comet rotation period divided in 24 hours. 0.000 0.525 12.944 43.439 57.365 57.906 84.251 85.275 176.77 3.443 3.440 3.365 3.174 3.084 3.080 2.904 2.897 2.230 56.4 60.7 58.4 58.3 67.0 61.1 63.7 67.6 53.0 time (h) 10.0025 9.3979 10.1517 9.3045 8.0281 8.9563 8.2379 7.6880 7.9924 48.1 29.3 44.9 55.0 40.5 42.0 44.7 53.2 45.0 38.8 45.2 67.5 95.0 96.2 94.7 97.8 97.8 51.7 Spacecraft clock time Resolution (m/px) Local solar 12.5 12.5 15.0 7.7 5.0 19.2 367617963 367621623 368299474 369369214 377184571 384381667 Table 2. Same as Table 1 but for BAP 2. time (h) 12.9488 14.4624 17.6636 17.0423 16.0833 19.7250 Spacecraft clock time Resolution (m/px) Local solar Average incidence angle (°) Average emission angle (°) Average phase angle (°) Days from 25 Aug 2014 Helio centric (first acquisition) distance (AU) 62.5 58.0 64.2 60.2 53.7 69.2 56.0 40.8 60.6 66.2 55.8 34.0 37.0 36.7 47.4 67.9 92.2 47.3 0.000 0.043 7.888 20.269 110.726 194.026 3.485 3.486 3.439 3.364 2.770 2.153 Average incidence angle (°) Average emission angle (°) Average phase angle (°) Days from 24 Aug 2014 Helio centric (first acquisition) distance (AU) 12.9 12.9 7.1 8.2 5.9 19.9 time (h) 13.9854 15.3450 11.9664 14.2728 14.9415 12.8080 26.5 33.8 31.5 56.9 49.3 52.5 39.1 38.8 68.9 108.8 91.0 51.9 50.7 55.3 57.4 55.9 53.3 31.9 3.488 3.488 3.364 3.059 2.842 2.233 0.000 0.043 20.66 68.785 100.846 184.04 367589075 367592759 369374074 373532092 376302211 383489908 Table 3. Same as Table 1 but for SPOT 6. The two BAPs have been identified in correspondence of elevated structures, some of them showing circular shapes, which display erosion and mass wasting on their sides. Both areas are exposed towards the lower Imhotep (Thomas et al., 2015) plain where the waste material is accumulated as boulders and debris (Filacchione et al., 2016a), which suggests that they originated from mass wasting. SPOT 6 is a cluster of some twenty small bright spots located in the Khepry region at the base of a scarp bordering a roundish flat terrace (Barucci et al., 2016). Also in this case it is very probable that the origin of the icy region is due to mass wasting from the nearby flat terrace. The locations of the selected patches on the comet surface are indicated in Figure 1. Figure 1. The three icy regions taken into account in this work are marked on the shape model of the comet surface (Preusker et al., 2015). Imhotep and Khepry regions are indicated and colored on the shape model. Analysis of spectral parameters Spectral analysis of VIRTIS data has shown that spectra across the surface present a positive ("red") VIS-IR slope and are basically featureless, except for the presence of a broad absorption feature around 2.9-3.6 μm. This absorption band is ubiquitous on the entire comet surface, and it is compatible with carbon-bearing compounds (Capaccioni et al., 2015). At large scale, most of the surface is depleted of water ice except for some specific regions where the presence of water ice is revealed by the shift of the absorption band toward shorter wavelengths (the band center moves from 3.2 to 3.0 μm), a slight increase in the band depth, a change of slope (the spectra are flatter, or "bluer") and a slight increase in albedo, which makes these spectra compatible with the presence of few percent of fine-grained water ice (De Sanctis et al., 2015; Filacchione et al., 2016b; Ciarniello et al., submitted). By using both VIRTIS and OSIRIS data, Filacchione et al. (2016) and Barucci et al. (2016) observed a number of wider and more complex icy patches. For these icy regions, all the diagnostic absorption bands of water ice located at 1.05, 1.25, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0 μm (see Figure 2) are observed, and all the spectra display bluer levels of slopes in the VIS and IR ranges from the ice-free areas. Figure 2. Spectra of pure water ice simulated with Hapke model (see Appendix) by means of optical constants provided by Warren et al. (1984), Mastrapa et al. (2008), Mastrapa et al. (2009), Clark et al. (2012), for different grain sizes. The diagnostic absorption bands of water ice located at 1.05, 1.25, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0 μm are clearly visible. In order to derive quantitative information on the amount of ice, we have identified a number of spectral indicators that allow minimizing the spectral dimensionality, still preserving the relevant information contained in the spectra. The spectral indicators are the slopes in VIS and IR, and band areas. The slope in the visible and in the infrared part of the spectra are calculated with a linear fit to the spectrum in the range 0.55 – 0.75 μm for the visible channel, and 1.0 – 2.35 μm for the infrared channel as shown in Figure 3. The absorption band at 1.05 and 1.5 μm are not taken into account in this work because they are prone to artifacts, being the former located close to the junction between the two spectral channels, and the latter being affected by the junctions of the instrumental order sorting filters. The band areas of the absorption bands at 1.25, 2.0 and 3.2 μm (see Figure 4) are calculated as: 𝑏 ∫ 1 − 𝑎 reflectance(λ) continuum(λ) dλ Being a and b the edges of the band: 1.16 - 1.38 μm, 1.83 - 2.24 μm, 2.62 - 3.60 μm, respectively. The continuum used to characterize the bands is calculated with a linear fit between a and b. The reflectance level correspondent to the band edges is calculated with a median of 7 spectels. In those pixels where water ice is scarce or absent, the lowest value of the band area can be negative because the shape of the spectrum is concave while the continuum defined by the linear fit is a straight line. This is mainly the case for the band area at 1.25 μm. This does not affect our spectral analysis. In the region 2.9-3.6 μm there is a superposition of the ubiquitous organics band and the water ice band. Although a variation of the band area at 3.0 μm can be due to either compound, we ruled out the contribution of the organics, as the increase in band area was always associated with a shift of the band center towards shorter wavelengths which clearly indicates an increasing content of water ice rather than organic material as already observed by Filacchione et al. (2016b) and Ciarniello et al. (submitted). We mapped the spectral indicators across the selected areas, and in Figure 5 we show the distribution of the three band areas and the spectral slopes for a single acquisition of BAP 1. The spectral indicators are distributed according to different and well-defined patterns. The pattern shown by the band area at 2.0 μm is intermediate between the pattern shown by the band areas at 1.25 μm and 3.0 μm. The 1.25 μm band traces the areas with the largest ice abundance or largest grain size, while the 3.0 μm band is more widespread. This will be described in more detail in the next section. The scatter plots in Figure 6 indicate the consistency of the results obtained for the various spectral indicators; the increase in the 2.0 μm band area is associated to a flatter IR spectrum pointing to an increase of the ice abundance, the same is true for the VIS and IR spectral slopes which consistently decrease with increasing abundance of ice, as described in next section. Figure 3. Reflectance spectrum of 67P normalized at 2.8 µm. This spectrum does not exhibit the typical water ice features. The spectrum in the range 0.5-1.0 μm is measured by the VIS channel, while the 1-5 μm range is covered by the IR channel. The broad absorption band at 3.2 μm is compatible with the presence of organic compounds. The slopes are calculated with a linear fit to the spectrum in the range 0.55 – 0.75 μm for the visible channel (blue line), and 1.0 – 2.35 μm for the infrared channel (red line). Figure 4. A reflectance spectrum normalized at 1.1 μm, showing significant water ice absorption bands, is depicted. The continuum in correspondence of the absorption bands at 1.25, 2.0 and 3.2 μm is calculated with a linear fit at fixed wavelengths. The band area under the continuum is highlighted. The gray boxes represent the spectral ranges affected by the junctions of the instrumental order sorting filters, which produce unreliable spectral features, and thus are not taken into account in the analysis. Figure 5. Analysis from acquisition 371998863 of BAP 1 (see Table 1). Panel A: context image (IR channel at 1.8 μm). Panels B, C, and D show the band areas (μm) of the absorption band at 1.25 μm, 2.0 μm and 3.0 μm, respectively. Panels E and F show the slopes (μm-1) respectively in the VIS and IR channel. Non- illuminated pixels are marked in black and excluded from the analysis. Figure 6. Scatter plot of the all pixels in acquisition 371998863, excluding those in shadow. Left and right panel show the good correlation between the slope in the IR channel with respectively the band area at 2.0 μm and the slope in the VIS channel. Spectral modeling To quantify the ice abundance, grain size and mixing modalities we have applied Hapke's radiative transfer model (Hapke, 2012) as described by Ciarniello et al. (2011). A similar approach was adopted in the two previous papers by Filacchione et al. (2016) and De Sanctis et al. (2015). The model allows deriving the spectrophotometric properties of mixtures of several end-members characterized by their abundances and grain sizes. As the objective of this work is the study of water ice, we minimized the number of end-members by using only crystalline water ice and a "dark terrain" unit corresponding to the average spectrum of the comet's surface after the application of photometric correction (Ciarniello et al., 2015). Crystalline ice has been simulated using optical constants measured at T=160 K between 0.5 and 4 μm (Warren et al., 1984; Mastrapa et al., 2008; Mastrapa et al., 2009; Clark et al., 2012). In addition we adopted two mixing modalities: a linear (areal) mixing in which the surface is modeled as a collection of patches of either pure water or pure dark terrain, and each photon interacts only with a single species. An intimate mixing in which single grains of the end-members are in contact with each other and the single photons can directly interact with both species. The abundance and grain size of the water ice are free parameters. The abundance retrieved by the model has to be intended as the fraction of total cross section of the ice grains over the area subtended by the pixel. Quantitative estimations on the deeper layers of ice cannot be directly retrieved because the reflected light measured by the instrument interacts only with the first layer of ice grains. Abundance and grain size were retrieved using an iterative best-fit procedure to minimize the deviation between the model results and the measured spectra (see Appendix for further details on the model and the best-fitting procedure). The results, in agreement with our previous work (Filacchione et al., 2016) are that the observed spectra require both areal and intimate mixture and, most interestingly, they require a bimodal distribution of icy grains: mm-sized grains in areal mixtures, and ~50 μm sized grains in intimate mixtures. The left panel of Figure 7 shows an example of a fitted spectrum rich in water ice, which requires 0.9% water ice with 1800 μm grain size in areal mixture, and 2.2% water ice with 45 μm grain size in intimate mixture with the dark material. To illustrate the effect of the mixing modalities on the right panel we show the spectra produced by the two different populations. The most striking differences are the absence of the 1.25 μm band in the small grain size mixture (blue curve) and the saturation of all ice bands in the large grain spectrum (red curve). In order to characterize the influence of ice abundance and grain sizes of both grain populations on the overall shape of the spectra we performed specific simulations by taking into account the typical retrieved values, as shown in Figure 8. The simulated spectra are normalized in order to highlight the variations of the spectral indicators as a function of the parameters of the model: - The slope in the VIS channel is only affected by variation in abundance for both populations of grains; - The slope in the IR channel is affected by all four parameters; - The band area at 1.25 μm is only affected by properties of the ice with large grains in areal mixture; - The band area at 3.0 μm is only affected by properties of the ice with small grains in intimate mixture; - Band area at 1.5 μm (not taken into account in this work) and band area at 2.0 μm are affected by all parameters. While it's relatively common to find ice patch spectra without the 1.25 μm absorption band (only intimately mixed water ice), spectra which clearly present a saturation of the icy features (see red curve of Figure 7) are very uncommon or absent among the pixels constituting the analyzed areas. This means that the patches of mm-sized water ice are usually embedded in a surface of intimately mixed and finer grained ice. This is indeed what is observed in Figure 5 (panels B and D). In Figure 9 two different collections of measured spectra show the effect of a variation of the abundance of both populations of water ice. Model used to retrieve the abundances is the same used to produce the simulated spectra in Figure 8. The variety of the measured spectra can be mainly attributed to a variation of the abundance and partially to the grain size of the water ice within the spots. This is shown in the scatter plots in Figure 10, which reports the case of the acquisition 371998863 (the same as for Figures 5 and 6) as an example: the abundance of water ice in areal mixture (panel A of Figure 10) is in good correlation with the band area at 1.25 μm. By grouping the symbols in the Figure according to their grain size it seems that for the pixels with grain size < 2000 μm the upper limit is ~1% of abundance, while it is higher for pixels with larger grain size. Panels B, C, D of Figure 10 show the correlation between the abundance of the water ice in intimate mixture with the band area at 2.0 μm, the band area at 3.0 μm, and the slope in the IR channel, respectively. For the 2.0 μm band area and the IR slope case, the different grain sizes lead to different lines of correlation. For the 3.0 μm band area, the different groups seem to follow the same line, but they are limited by different upper bounds. These three parameters are marginally affected by the variation of properties of the mm-sized grain population because of the lower amount of the latter. For the purpose of this analysis only spectra with a band area at 2.0 μm larger than 0.005 μm are taken into account. This threshold is equal to the mean level + 3 standard deviations of the band area, as calculated in a region outside of the icy patches. Possible interpretations of the results obtained here are discussed in the next sections under the general context of the temporal evolution of the icy patches. Figure 7.Left panel: VIRTIS reflectance spectrum (sample 25, line 20, spacecraft clock time 371998843) in black. Error bars are calculated as described by Raponi (2014). Best fit in red: 0.9% water ice with 1800 μm grain size in areal mixture, and 2.2% water ice with 45 μm grain size in intimate mixture with the dark material. Spectral ranges affected by the junctions of the filters are not taken into account in the analysis. Discrepancy between best fit and the VIS channel can be due to the not perfect co-registration between VIS and IR channels. In the right panel the two populations of the water ice retrieved with the model have been decoupled: in red a scaled spectrum of pure water ice with 1800 μm grain size, in blue an intimate mixture of 2.2% water ice with 45 μm grain size and 97.8% dark terrain. Figure 8. Simulated reflectance spectra are shown to highlight the effect of variation in abundance and grain size of the water ice. The black curve represents an intimate mixture of dark terrain and 2% of water ice with 50 μm grain size, which in turn is in areal mixing with 0.5% water ice with 2000 μm grain size. The red and blue curves are simulated by varying one of these parameters at a time, as indicated: the panels on the left show the effect of a variation in abundance, and the panels on the right a variation in grain size, for both populations of water ice: intimate mixing in the upper panels (spectra normalized at 1.16 μm), and areal mixing in the lower panels (spectra normalized at 2.62 μm). The spectral ranges are not taken into account in correspondence of artifacts that have prevented the definition of the albedo of the dark terrain. Figure 9. According to the model, the collected measured spectra show the effect of a variation of the abundance of water ice in intimate mixture (left), and the effect of variation of the abundance for the areal mixtures (right). The retrieved abundance is shown in the panels. Figure 10. Analysis of acquisition 371998843. Spectra selected are those with band area at 2.0 μm larger than 0.005. Panel A: Abundance of water ice in areal mixture as a function of the band area at 1.25 μm. Panels B, C, D show the correlation between the abundance of water ice in intimate mixture with respectively the band area at 2.0 μm, the band area at 3.0 μm, and the slope in the IR channel. The symbols are marked with different colors according to their grain size as indicated in the panels. Water ice property retrieval by means of spectra in the visible range The aim of this section is to give a useful guideline for the retrieval of the icy patches' properties by means of instruments operating only in the visible spectral range. Thanks to the Hapke model we can retrieve the water ice abundance by modeling the normalized spectral slope. We do not take into account the absolute signal level because it can be affected by uncertainties on the radiometric and photometric accuracy as well as errors on the local geometry information, due to unresolved shadows and roughness. As shown in Figure 8 the slope in the VIS channel is sensitive to the water ice abundance and the type of mixing (areal or intimate), while it is not affected by the grain size. In principle we cannot distinguish between the two types of mixing by just the slope in the VIS channel, and thus we can only give lower and upper limits by assuming water ice in areal or intimate mixture with the dark material, respectively (black and red lines in Figure 11). However, from the analysis performed on the three icy patches discussed in the present work, we obtain as a general result that the ratio between the abundances of water ice in intimate and areal mixture is in the range 1 - 10 (see next sections and upper panels of Figures 15, 16, and 17). By assuming this range of ratios, we can reduce the gap between the lower and upper limit (blue and green line in Figure 11). The phase function should also be accounted for by the model, as it can produce slope variations of the order of +0.007 μm-1 / deg, according to Ciarniello et al. (2015). Moreover, the dark terrain used as a spectral end-member could contain itself a small percentage of water ice, and thus the water ice abundance could be underestimated. Figure 11. Curves: theoretical abundance of water ice as a function of the slope in the VIS channel, as calculated by means of the Hapke radiative transfer model at a phase of 95.0° (same phase as acquisition 371998843). The red and black lines correspond to water ice entirely in intimate or in areal mixture with the dark terrain, respectively. The blue and red lines correspond to the ratio between the amount of water ice in intimate and areal mixture equal to 1 and 10, respectively. Dots: Water ice total abundance as a function of the measured slope in the VIS channel, for the acquisition 371998843. Spectra selected are those with band area at 2.0 μm larger than 0.005. Abundance is retrieved as described in previous section by means of the spectra in the IR channel. Dashed gray line: average slopes of the dots. The width of the dashed line is equal to the error on the average slope. We take into account the acquisition 371998843 in order to compare the theoretical curves shown in Figure 11 with the abundance retrieved as in previous section by means of the spectra in the IR channel (the points of Figure 11). The ratio between the water ice abundance in intimate and areal mixing is close to 10 for this acquisition (see upper panels of Figure 15). This is consistent with the dispersion of the points shown in Figure 11 around a curve close to the green one. By taking the average of the VIS slope obtained for the points shown in Figure 11 we can constrain the amount of water ice of the patch in the range 0.6 – 1.2 %, assuming the ratio between the abundances of water ice in intimate and areal mixture in the range 1 - 10. The total abundance retrieved with spectra in IR range is 1.1 % (see upper left panel of Figure 15), thus demonstrating the consistency of the result obtained with spectra in the VIS channel with that obtained with spectra in the IR channel. Temporal evolution of ice-rich areas The collected acquisitions listed in Tables 1, 2, and 3 allow following the temporal evolution of the three icy regions analyzed in this work. According to the previous discussion and as shown in Fig. 4, we selected the absorption band at 2.0 μm as a reliable indicator of the water ice presence. Each hyperspectral cube was orthorectified and projected on a cylindrical map. The temporal evolution of the 2.0 μm band area in each ice-rich region, BAP 1, BAP 2 and SPOT 6, is shown in Figures 12, 13 and 14. To give a quantitative estimate of the amount of ice present in the region under observation, the spectra with band area at 2.0 μm larger than 0.005 are taken into account. The retrieved water ice abundances are averaged, weighted by the area covered by each pixel, calculated as Area = resolution2 / cos(emission angle). The result is the fraction of the total area of the patch in which the solar flux interacts with the icy grains, which is a proxy for the surface density of water ice (upper left panels of Figures 15, 16 and 17). This abundance is multiplied by the total area subtended by the pixels taken into account, to obtain the total cross section of the water ice (upper right panels of Figures 15, 16 and 17). The lower panels of Figures 15, 16, and 17 show the grain size retrieved for the two populations of grains as a function of time. Figure 12. The band area at 2.0 μm is mapped for each acquisition of BAP 1. The panels represent the acquisition listed in Table 1. The increase of the extension and intensity of the feature in the first 6 panels, and then their decrease are quite evident. In the last panel the feature is very weak or absent. The dark areas are in shadow. The white areas outside the edge of the map in panels D and F are outside the field of view of the acquisitions. Figure 13. Same as Figure 12 but for BAP 2. Figure 14. Same as Figure 12 but for SPOT 6. Figure 15. BAP 1: water ice abundance (upper left panel) and total cross section of water ice (upper right panel) is plotted as a function of time for the two types of mixtures modeled. The latter could be affected by the limited view of the icy region because of shadows, or because part of the region is outside the field of view of the instrument: those symbols are marked with an arrow indicating a lower limit. The lines are produced with a polynomial fit of the points (without including those with the arrow). The bell shaped curve is evident for both populations of water ice. The total amount of the water ice in areal mixture is always a small portion of the total amount of water ice which covers the surface. The errors on the retrieved values (not shown for the sake of clarity) are of the order of the size of the symbols. Lower panel: the mean grain size is plotted as a function of time. The errors are calculated as the standard deviation of the values divided by the square root of the number of selected pixels. Figure 16. Same as Figure 15 but for BAP 2. Figure 17. Same as Figure 15 but for SPOT 6. Discussion The most striking aspect of the observations presented in this work is that all three ice-rich regions have a life cycle in which the icy patch increases in size and abundance, reaches a maximum and is followed by a rapid decrease after which, eventually, the ice disappears from the surface. The three areas analyzed are all very close to the equator, which is consistent with their similar thermal history and evolution. The determined lifecycle allows us to realistically exclude a diurnal cycle as the major driver for the observed variability and, indeed as reported in Tables 1, 2 and 3, the observations cover a restricted range of local times and incidence angles. However, significant variations on smaller time scales can be appreciated both in the extension and intensity of the icy features. As an example panels G and H of Figure 12 concern two acquisitions of BAP 1 which are close in time (24 hours, two comet's rotations) but the latter presents a significantly smaller extension and lower intensity of the 2.0 μm band. This is also confirmed by the retrieved abundances (upper panels of Figure 15). This difference cannot be accounted for entirely by the diverse shadowing. Although we cannot exclude uncertainties due to the different resolution and viewing geometry of the acquisitions, it is reasonable to explain such variation with a diurnal cycle, which produces short-term behavior, overlapped to the seasonal cycle. The spatial distribution of the 3.0 μm and 1.25 μm band area values could support the understanding of the temporal stability of the patch: as discussed above, the 3.0 μm band area (panel D of Figure 5) is an indicator of the presence of the finer intimately mixed icy grains. Their concentration seems to follow the shadow, being larger closer to the non- illuminated areas, indicating a sublimation of the finer icy grains when exposed to the solar light. Conversely, the 1.25 μm band area is an indicator of larger grains in areal mixing (panel B of Figure 5), which are grouped in small spots independently from the shadow position, indicating their temporal stability with respect to the solar input, at least in the diurnal time scale. Most of the water ice is in the form of finer grains, in intimate mixture with the dark material. This population is the main driver of the variability of the amount of water ice (see upper panels of Figures 15, 16, 17). In contrast, ice in mm-sized grains appears very locally concentrated in specific spots embedded in the more widespread finer grains. Except for BAP 1, the average size of the mm-sized grain population seems to decrease as a function of time (lower left panels of Figures 15, 16, 17), most probably because the sublimation produces erosion of the grains. Conversely, the average size of the ~50 μm sized grain population increases with time for all patches. This can be explained by the complete sublimation of the smaller grains, which causes the size distribution to shift towards larger sizes. This is also confirmed by their spatial distribution shown in panel C of Figure 10: the pixels with the larger amount of water ice (blue and black dots) are populated by the finer grains and vice versa, indicating that where the sublimation has been less effective the water ice is still abundant with a small average grain size. On the other hand, inside the icy spots with mm-sized grains, more affected by grain erosion than complete sublimation, the pixels present larger abundances and larger grain sizes (green dots of panel A in Figure 10) where the solar input has been less intense. Conclusion As reported by Filacchione et al. (2015) and Barucci et al. (2016) the observed patches occur in areas affected by mass wasting and erosion; consequently, the three ice-rich regions very likely represent the occasional exposure of sub-surface layers fairly rich in water ice. This is a common finding on 67P where ice is predominantly absent and only temporary present at the surface, when exposed due to occasional erosional events or in form of recondensed ice in specific location (De Sanctis et al, 2015). In addition, in all these areas, along with ice grains of tens of microns intimately mixed with the dark component, we observed also areas with mm-sized grains, which make a relevant contribution to the overall water ice abundance. The presence of mm-sized grains is quite unexpected at the surface of the nucleus because, as reported by many authors (Yang et al., 2009; Sunshine et al., 2007; Protopapa et al., 2014; De Sanctis et al., 2015; Ciarniello et al., submitted), modeling of observed coma and nucleus surface spectra seems to indicate that the typical size range of the ice grains observed in comets never exceeds tens of micron. Filacchione et al. (2015) already identified mm-sized ice grains in BAP 1 and BAP 2. The addition of SPOT 6 from a completely different region indicates that the presence of larger grains in subsurface layers is a common feature of the water ice's physical status. The large size possibly derives from physical processes acting within deeper layers of the nucleus, as for instance by the growth of secondary ice crystals from vapor diffusion in ice-rich colder layers, and/or by ice grain sintering (see Filacchione et al., 2016a, and references therein). The exposure of deeper layers is consistent with their occurrence in "active" areas where falls or landslides could have caused the occasional exposure of water ice rich layers. After the initial exposure of the ice, the activity of the affected area increases thus causing dust removal powered by sublimation, which provides a positive feedback on the exposure itself. The process develops as the solar flux increases, and it reaches a turning point when the exposure rate is overcome by the sublimation rate, until the complete sublimation of the patch. The similarity in the lifecycles of the three patches analyzed in this work (180 days) and the similarity in the ice grains size distribution, seems to indicate that water ice is rather evenly distributed in the subsurface layers and mixed to the ubiquitous dark terrain. Furthermore, our present findings also indicate the absence of large water ice reservoirs in the subsurface. This is confirmed by the recent work of Filacchione et al, 2016b and Ciarniello et al., 2016 where an overall and diffuse increase in the abundance in water ice has been derived from the VIRTIS observations spanning the period August 2014 through May 2015. Indeed, the consistent erosion rate of the nucleus of 67P (Bertaux, 2015; Keller et al., 2015), would allow exposure of large-scale dis-homogeneities, and in particular of regions highly enriched in water ice, which would last for a longer timescale, if present. The knowledge of the temporal evolution of the ice-rich regions identified, can constrain the thickness of the layer and the amount of water released to the coma during the sublimation process: this will be the subject of a following work. Appendix Hapke model and fitting procedure description A quantitative spectral analysis of the composition has been performed using Hapke's radiative transfer model (Hapke, 2012) as described by Ciarniello et al. (2011). Eq. 1A 𝑟(𝑖, 𝑒, 𝑔) = 𝑤(𝜆) 4𝜋 µ0 µ0 + µ [𝐵𝑆𝐻 𝑝(𝑔, 𝜆) + 𝐻(𝑤, µ0)𝐻(𝑤, µ) − 1] 𝑆(𝑖, 𝑒, 𝑔, 𝜃)𝐵𝐶𝐵 Where r is the bidirectional reflectance, i, e, g are the incidence, emission and phase angle, respectively; w is the single scattering albedo (SSA); p(g,λ) is the single particle phase function; μ0, μ are the cosines of the incidence and emission angles; H(w,μ) the Ambartsumian-Chandrasekhar functions describing the multiple scattering components; BSH the shadow hiding opposition effect term; BCB the coherent back-scattering opposition effect; S(i, e, g, θ) the shadow function modeling large scale roughness and θ the average surface slope. During the VIRTIS-M observations described in this paper the solar phase was always > 35°. As a consequence, the shadow hiding effect is negligible. This implies posing the terms BSH and BCB equal to 1. The other photometric parameters in the equation are fixed as resulting from Ciarniello et al. (2015). The geometry information is derived from the information on the digital shape model of the comet (Preusker et al., 2015), the spacecraft attitude, the comet's attitude, and the relative positions. The single scattering albedo w can be modelled as a mixing between the dark terrain of the comet and water ice. The former was defined by Ciarniello et al. (2015), for the latter the SSA is calculated from the optical constants (Warren et al., 1984; Mastrapa et al., 2008; Mastrapa et al., 2009; Clark et al., 2012) and from the grain size by means of the Hapke compositional model (2012). We have used areal and intimate mixing modalities in the simulations: in the areal mixing the surface is modelled as patches of pure water ice and dark terrain, with each photon scattered within one patch. In this case the resulting reflectance is a linear combination of the reflectance of the different end-members. In the intimate mixing model the particles of the two end-member materials are in contact with each other and both are involved in the scattering of a single photon. In intimate mixing the single scattering albedo of the mixture is the weighted average, through their relative abundance P, of the Dark Terrain (DT) and Water Ice (WI) single scattering albedos. Most of the spectra inside the patches require both kinds of mixtures and two different grain sizes of water ice. Thus the resulting reflectance r(λ) is given by: Eq. 2A r(λ) = rWI_A(λ) PWI_A + rWI_DT_I(λ) (PWI_I + PDT), with: rWI_DT_I = rWI_DT_I (w(λ)DT PDT + w(λ)WI_I PWI_I), Where r is the bidirectional reflectance (Eq. 1A) and the suffix "A" and "I" state for the areal and intimate mixture. The best-fitting result is obtained by applying the Levenberg-Marquardt method for nonlinear least squares multiple regression (Marquardt, 1963) Free parameters of the model are: - Abundance and grain size of the water ice for both intimate and areal mixtures. - A multiplicative constant of the absolute level of reflectance of the model, in order to account for uncertainties on the radiometric and photometric accuracy as well as errors on the local geometry information, due to unresolved shadows and roughness. - A slope added to the model in order to better fit the measured spectrum in the IR channel: in some cases, the measured spectra present an artificial slope where high signal contrast is measured between adjacent pixels, like regions near shadows. This is due to the increasing full with half maximum of the spatial point spread function toward longer wavelengths (Filacchione, 2006). - Temperature and effective emissivity (Davidsson et al., 2009). The latter is the product of the directional emissivity (see next section) and a free parameter used to account for unresolved shadow and the structure of the surface (Davidsson et al., 2009). Its interpretation is outside the scope of the present work. The total radiance is modeled by accounting for both the contributions of the reflected sunlight, and the thermal emission: Eq. 3A Rad(λ) = r(λ)* F⨀ / D2 + εeff * B(λ, T) ελ = H(w, μ) * γ(w) Where r(λ) is the Hapke bidirectional reflectance (Eq. 1A), F⨀ is the solar irradiance at 1 AU, D is the heliocentric distance (in AU), εeff is the effective emissivity, B(λ, T) is the Planck function. Emissivity In order to model the thermal emission we take into account the directional emissivity (ελ) relation (Hapke, 2012) which is a function of the single scattering albedo (w): Eq 4A being μ the emission angle cosine, and H the Ambartsumian-Chandrasekhar function. According to Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation, the emissivity and reflectance spectral contrasts (difference between continuum and band signal) have opposite signs. The higher is the thermal emission in the spectral range of the absorption band, the lower is the band depth (by summing the reflectance and the thermal emission), and it can even become an emission feature. By means of Eqs. 1A-4A, the spectral contrast has been simulated for the sum of the reflected and thermally emitted fluxes. In Figure 1A two different conditions are simulated on the base of the viewing geometry of the icy patches analyzed in this work and the temperatures obtained by Filacchione et al. (2015) and Barucci et al. (2016). As a result the emissivity spectral contrast can be considered negligible with respect to the reflectance spectral contrast. Figure 1A. The plots show the sum of the simulated spectral contrasts of reflected and emitted light. It is normalized to the value at shorter wavelengths (< 3.0 μm) for which thermal emission is not observed. Two conservative thermal conditions are simulated. For T = 180 K (blue line) the effect of the thermal emission is negligible in the spectral range taken into account in this work. For T = 210 K (red line) a possible absorption band at 5.0 μm would be flattened, and longward of that it would become an emission feature. Shortward of 4.0 μm, which is the limit of our analysis, the spectral signatures are affected as much as 5%. For the absorption band measured at 3.0 - 3.5 μm the effect is always negligible. Uniqueness of the solutions In order to produce the best fit we should evaluate if the solutions steadily converge, or if there are secondary solutions. This evaluation is made by the investigation of the χ2 function defined in the N-dimensional space, where N is the number of the free parameters. As an example we report in Figure 2A the projections of this space around the best fit of Figure 5: the icy spectrum for which the resulting water ice in areal mixture is 0.9 % and 1800 μm grain size, and 2.2 % at 45 μm grain size of water ice in intimate mixture with the dark terrain. As a result of these investigations significant secondary minima have never been found. Thus we can rely on the uniqueness of the solution. Figure 2A. In the four panels the χ2 function is plotted as a function of water ice abundances and grain sizes of the two populations of water ice. The absence of secondary minima confirms that the solutions are stable and there are no other sets of parameters which can produce models as good as the one retrieved. Acknowledgements We thank the following institutions and agencies for support of this work: Italian Space Agency (ASI, Italy) contract number I/024/12/1, Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES, France), DLR (Germany), NASA (USA) Rosetta Program, and Science and Technology Facilities Council (UK). VIRTIS was built by a consortium, which includes Italy, France, and Germany, under the scientific responsibility of the Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali of INAF, Italy, which also guides the scientific operations. The VIRTIS instrument development, led by the prime contractor Leonardo-Finmeccanica (Florence, Italy), has been funded and managed by ASI, with contributions from Observatoire de Meudon financed by CNES, and from DLR. We thank the Rosetta Science Ground Segment and the Rosetta Mission Operations Centre for their support throughout all the phases of the mission. The VIRTIS calibrated data will be available through the ESA's Planetary Science Archive Website (www.rssd.esa.int/index.php?project=PSA&page=index) and is available upon request until posted to the archive. References A'Hearn M. F. et al., 2005, Science, 310, 258-264. A'Hearn M. F. et al., 2011a, Science, 332, 1396-1400. A'Hearn M. F. et al., 2011b, Annu. Rev. Astron Astroph, 49, 281-299. Barucci M. A. et al., 2016, submitted to A&A. Bertaux J.-L., 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 583, id.A38, 10 pp. Bockelée-Morvan D. and Rickman H., 1997, Earth Moon Planets 79, 55-57. Bockelée-Morvan D. et al., 2004, the university of Arizona press, Tucson, 391-423. Capaccioni F. et al., 2015, Science 347, aaa0628. Ciarniello M. et al., 2011, Icarus 214, 541-555. Ciarniello M. et al., 2015, A&A, 583, 31. Ciarniello M. et al., 2016, MNRAS, submitted to this special issue. Clark R. N. et al., 2012, Icarus, 218, 831. Coradini A. et al., 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 128, 529. Davidsson B. J. R. et al, 2009, Icarus, 201, 335-357. De Sanctis M. C. et al, 2015, Nature, 525, 500. Feaga L. M. et al., 2007, Icarus, 190, 345-356. Filacchione G., 2006, PhD Thesis, Università di Napoli Federico II Filacchione G. et al., 2016a, Nature, 529, 368 Filacchione G. et al., 2016b, Icarus, 274, p. 334-349. Hapke B., 2012, Theory of reflectance and emittance spectroscopy. Cambridge University Press. Keller H. U. et al., 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 128, 26 Keller H. U. et al., Astronomy & Astrophysics, 583, id.A34, 16 pp. Marquardt. J., 1963,Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11(2), 431–441. Mastrapa R. et al., 2008, Icarus, 197, 307-320. Mastrapa R. et al., 2009, Astrophys. J., 701, 1347-1356. Mumma M. J. and Charnley S. B., 2011, A&A 49, 471-524. Pommerol A. et al. 2015, A&A, 583, 25. Preusker F. et al., 2015, A&A, 583, 19. Protopapa S. et al., 2014, Icarus, 238, p. 191-204. Raponi A. et al., 2013, LPI Contribution No. 1719, p.1507. Raponi A., 2014, PhD Thesis, Università degli studi di Roma Tor Vergata Sunshine J. M. et al., 2006, Science, 311, 1453-1455. Sunshine J. M. et al., 2007, Icarus 190, 284-294. Thomas P. et al., 2015, Science 347 Veverka J. et al., 2012, Icarus, 222, 424-435. Warren S. G. et al., 1984, Appl. Opt. 23, 1206. Yang B. et al., 2009, Astron. J., 137, 4538-4546.
0907.4318	3	0907	2010-08-24T15:12:51	Efficient computation of the quadrupole light deflection	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.IM" ]	Efficient computation of the quadrupole light deflection for quasars/quasars and solar system objects within the framework of the baseline Gaia relativity model (GREM) is discussed. Two refinements have been achieved with the goal to improve the performance of the model: First, the quadrupole deflection formulas for both cases are simplified as much as possible considering the Gaia nominal orbit (only approximate minimal distances between Gaia and the giant planets were used here), physical parameters of the giant planets and the envisaged accuracy of 1 microarcsecond for individual systematic effects. The recommended formulas are given by Eq.(40) for stars/quasars and by Eq.(81) for solar system objects. Second, simple expressions for the upper estimate of the quadrupole light deflection have been found allowing, with a few additional arithmetical operations, to judge a priori if the quadrupole light deflection should be computed or not for a given source and for a given requested accuracy. The recommended criteria are given by Eq.(45) for stars/quasars and by Eq.(92) for solar system objects. Additionally, the quadrupole Shapiro effect for solar system objects is reconsidered. A strict upper bound of quadrupole Shapiro effect for solar system objects is given in Eq.(109).	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Efficient computation of the quadrupole light deflection Sven Zschocke, Sergei A. Klioner Lohrmann Observatory, Dresden Technical University, Mommsen Str. 13, D-01062 Dresden, Germany GAIA-CA-TN-LO-SZ-001-2 October 31, 2018 Efficient computation of the quadrupole light deflection for both stars/quasars and solar system objects within the framework of the baseline Gaia relativity model (GREM) is discussed. Two refinements have been achieved with the goal to improve the performance of the model: -- The quadrupole deflection formulas for both cases are simplified as much as possible considering the Gaia nominal orbit (only approximate minimal distances between Gaia and the giant planets were used here), physical parameters of the giant planets and the envisaged accuracy of 1 µas for individual systematic effects. The recom- mended formulas are given by Eq. (40) for stars/quasars and by Eq. (81) for solar system objects. -- Simple expressions for the upper estimate of the quadrupole light deflection have been found allowing, with a few additional arithmetical operations, to judge a priori if the quadrupole light deflection should be computed or not for a given source and for a given requested accuracy. The recommended criteria are given by Eq. (45) for stars/quasars and by Eq. (92) for solar system objects. The quadrupole Shapiro effect for solar system objects is reconsidered. A strict up- per bound of quadrupole Shapiro effect for solar system objects is given in Eq. (109). 0 1 0 2 g u A 4 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 3 v 8 1 3 4 . 7 0 9 0 : v i X r a Contents I. Introduction II. Some basics about light propagation III. The quadrupole light deflection for stars and quasars IV. Approximation of the quadrupole light deflection formula for stars and quasars A. Estimate of the vectorial coefficients B. Estimate of the scalar functions C. Collection of all terms V. An upper estimate of the quadrupole light deflection for stars and quasars VI. The quadrupole light deflection for solar system objects VII. Approximation of quadrupole light deflection for solar system objects A. Estimate of the vectorial coefficients B. Estimate of the scalar funtions 1. Estimate of BA 2. Estimate of CA 3. Estimate of DA C. Collection of all terms VIII. An upper estimate of the quadrupole light deflection for solar system objects IX. Shapiro effect for solar system objects X. Numerical tests XI. Summary References A. Proof of Eq. (87) B. Proof of Eq. (94) C. Proof of inequalities (107) and (108) 2 3 3 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 16 17 19 19 21 21 22 3 I. INTRODUCTION Gaia mission will reach an accuracy on microarcsecond (µas) level. This level of accuracy requires a precise modelling of light propagation. In particular, the light deflection due to quadrupole gravitational field of deflecting bodies should be taken into account [12]. Analytical formulas for quadrupole light deflection are well known. Analytical solutions of light deflection in a quadrupole gravitational field have been investigated by many authors [1, 6 -- 13, 15]. For the first time the full analytical solution for the light trajectory in a quadrupole field has been obtained in [10]. These results were confirmed by a different approach in [2]. Various generalization (higher-order multipole moments, time-dependence, etc.) were derived in [3 -- 5]. The formulas suitable for high-accuracy data reduction are given e.g. in [12]. However, the Gaia mission will determine the astrometric positions of about 109 objects, implying a data reduction of about 1012 individual observations during the mission time of 5 years. It is, therefore, obvious that efficient analytical solutions of quadrupole light deflection are mandatory in order to succeed with data reduction. But the full expressions of these solutions of light deflection are rather involved and much too time-consuming for practical Gaia data reduction. Furthermore, the quadrupole light deflection will reach the microarcsecond level only for objects within a small observational field of giant planets. Accordingly, it is highly useful to find analytical criteria by means of which one can decide whether or not the quadrupole field needs to be taken into account. Such criteria can only be obtained by simpler analytical formulas. And finally, the implementation of the full expressions involve round-off errors in the Gaia data reduction. Therefore, it is tempting to obtain simpler analytical expressions which will not be hampered by such problems. By means of the assumption the Gaia spacecraft is located near the Earth's orbit (Gaia will have a Lissajous-like orbit around Lagrange point L2), we have obtained simpler expressions valid on microarcsecond level of accuracy. Criteria by means of which one can decide whether or not it is necessary to take into account the quadrupole effect have been derived. Furthermore, the accuracy of radio and laser radar links of future missions like Bepi- Columbo or Juno require modelling of the light travel time at the level of millimeters. Hence, also the Shapiro delay due to quadrupole fields is of practical interest. Therefore and for reasons of completeness, the known analytical expressions of quadrupole Shapiro effect will be reconsidered. Especially, an improved estimate of this effect is given. The report is organized as follows: In Section II we summarize some basics about light deflection and introduce the notation. In Section III the full quadrupole formula in post- Newtonian order for stars and quasars is presented. A simplified expression and criteria for stars and quasars for quadrupole light deflection are given in Sections IV and V. In Section VI the full quadrupole formula in post-Newtonian order for solar system objects is presented. A simplified expression and criteria for quadrupole light deflection of solar system objects are given in Sections VII and VIII. A strict upper bound of quadrupole Shapiro effect is given in Section IX. Numerical tests are given in Section X. The findings are summarized in Section XI. II. SOME BASICS ABOUT LIGHT PROPAGATION Let us summarize some basic formulas of light propagation in post-Newtonian approxi- mation. The geodetic equations in post-Newtonian order is linear with respect to the metric 4 components and, therefore, the coordinates of a photon and the derivative with respect to coordinate time t is given by [12] x(t) = x(t0) + c σ (t − t0) +Xi x(t) = c σ +Xi ∆ xi(t) . ∆xi(t) , (1) (2) Here, t0 is the time moment of emission, x0 = x(t0) is the position of the photon at the is the unit tangent moment of emission, i.e. the position of source, and σ = limt→−∞ vector at infinitly past. The position of observer is x1 = x(t1) and t1 is the moment of observation. The unit coordinate direction of the light propagation at the moment of c x(t) observation reads n = x(t1) x(t1) . In post-Newtonian order the transformation σ to n reads where n = σ +Xi δσi + O(cid:16)c−4(cid:17) , δσi = σ ×(cid:16)c−1 ∆ xi (t1) × σ(cid:17) . (3) (4) The sum in (3) runs over individual terms in the metric of various physical origins (e.g. monopole gravitational field of various bodies, quadrupole fields, higher multipole fields, etc.). The spherical symmetric term of light deflection is given by δσpN(t1) = σ ×(cid:16)c−1 ∆pN x(t1) × σ(cid:17) = XA σ · rA 1 ! . pN(t1) =− rA A 1 + (1 + γ) G MA dA d2 δσA c2 1 δσA pN(t1) , The sum in (5) runs over the bodies A of solar system. The impact vector dA = σ ×(cid:16)rA 1 × σ(cid:17) , (5) (6) has been introduced having the absolute value dA = dA. The vector rA 1 = x1 − xA is directed from body A towards the observer; the absolute value rA 1 , and γ is the PPN parameter (for general theory of relativity γ = 1). We also note the absolute value of the monopole contribution from one body A: 1 = rA = (1 + γ) G MA c2 1 dA 1 + 1 σ · rA 1 ! ≤ 2 (1 + γ) rA G MA c2 1 dA . (7) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) δσA pN(t1)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) In order to consider light propagation between two given points x0 and x1 (as it is needed for the data processing for solar system objects) let us define the vector rA 0 = x0 − xA, which is directed from body A towards the source and the vector R = x1 − x0 = rA 1 − rA 0 is directed from source towards observer. Furthermore, the unit direction from source to observer is k = R R , and the absolute value R = R, rA 0 = rA 0 . In post-Newtonian order, the transformation k to n reads where n = k +Xi δki + O(cid:16)c−4(cid:17) , 5 (8) (9) δki = k ×(cid:16)c−1 ∆ xi (t1) − R−1 ∆xi (t1)(cid:17) × k . The sum in (8) runs over individual terms in the metric of various physical origins (e.g. monopole gravitational field of various bodies, quadrupole fields, higher multipole fields, etc.). Thus, the spherical symmetric part reads (cf. Eq. (70) in [12] or cf. Eq. (24) in [16]): δkpN(t1) = k ×(cid:16)(cid:16)c−1 ∆ xpN (t1) − R−1 ∆xpN (t1)(cid:17) × k(cid:17) = XA pN(t1) = − (1 + γ) k ×(cid:16)rA δkA G c2 MA rA 1 1 + rA rA 0 rA . 1 (cid:17) 0 × rA 0 · rA 1 δkA pN(t1) , (10) The sum in (10) runs over the bodies A of solar system. We also note the absolute value of monopole term from one body A: δkA = (1 + γ) Here, the impact parameter dA can be computed as (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) pN(t1)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 1 × k(cid:17) + O(c−2) = k ×(cid:16)rA dA = k ×(cid:16)rA because of σ = k + O (c−2). MA rA 1 G c2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 1 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) rA 0 × rA 0 · rA 1 + rA rA 0 rA 1 . 0 × k(cid:17) + O(c−2) , (11) (12) III. THE QUADRUPOLE LIGHT DEFLECTION FOR STARS AND QUASARS Using the expression ∆ xQ (t1) given by Eq. (44) of [12] and inserting into Eq. (4) one gets [13] δσQ(t1) =XA δσA Q(t1) , δσA Q(t1) = 1 + γ 2 G c2 "α′ A UA(t1) c + β′ A EA(t1) c + γ ′ A FA(t1) c + δ′ A VA(t1) c # , (13) where the sum in (13) runs over the massive bodies A of solar system. The scalar functions are UA c EA c FA c VA c = 1 d3 A   1(cid:17)2 = (cid:16)rA 2 + 3 1 (rA 1(cid:17)3 1 )3  1 − (cid:16)σ · rA σ · rA  rA 1(cid:17)2 − 3 (cid:16)σ · rA 1 )5 (rA σ · rA 1 )5 , (rA , 1 =−3 dA 1 1 )3 , (rA =− , (14) (15) (16) (17) and the time-independent vectorial coefficients α ′ k A =−M A ′ k A = 2M A β γ ′ k A = M A ij ij σi σj dk A dA ij σi dj A dk A d2 A A dj di A dk A d3 A dj A dA − 2 M A ij σi σk dj A dA − 4 M A ij + 2 M A kj , − M A ij σi σj dk A dA , ′ k A =−2 M A δ ij σi σj σk + 2 M A kj σj − 4 M A ij σi dj A dk A d2 A . A dj A dk di A d3 A , 6 (18) (19) (20) (21) The quadrupole formula (13) is valid for sources at infinite distance from the observer. The sum over A in (13) runs, in principle, over all bodies inside the solar system, but only the giant planets contribute within the accuracy of 1 µas; the quadrupole effect of the Sun is irrelevant for Gaia mission because of the 45 degrees observation angle of the Sun by Gaia. The symmetric and tracefree quadrupole moment of an object A is defined in [10 -- 13] and given by M A ij =ZA d3x ρA(x) (cid:18)ri rj − 1 3 δij r2(cid:19) , ri = xi − xi A , (22) with the mass density ρA, and the integral is taken over the volume of body A; the Kro- necker symbol δij = 1 for i = j and zero otherwise. For an axial symmetric body (this approximation is sufficient for the giant planets and aimed accuracy of 1µas) one has (see Eqs. (48) -- (53) of [12]) M A ij = MA J A 2 P 2 A 1 3 R 1 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 − 2   RT , (23) where R is the rotational matrix giving the orientation of the symmetry (rotational) axis e3 of the massive body in the BCRS, MA is the mass of the massive body A, J A is the 2 coefficient of the second zonal harmonic of the gravitational field, PA is the minimal radius of a sphere containing the body A and whose center coincides with the center of mass of A (for the giant planets PA is just the equatorial radius). IV. APPROXIMATION OF THE QUADRUPOLE LIGHT DEFLECTION FORMULA FOR STARS AND QUASARS In this Section we will derive an approximation of (13) sufficient for the envisaged accuracy of 1 µas. From (13) one obtains the estimate δσQ≤ 1 + γ 2 G c2 XA "α′ A UA c A EA c + β′ A FA c + γ ′ A VA c # . + δ′ (24) 7 Note that since δσQ is perpendicular to σ, the absolute value δσQ gives, in the adopted post-Newtonian approximation, the change of the calculated or observed direction to star or quasar due to the quadrupole light deflection. Now we will estimate the terms in (24). For such an estimation we consider the case of an axial symmetric body because this ap- proximation is sufficient for the giant planets and goal accuracy of 1 µas, i.e. we take the quadrupole tensor in the form (23). A. Estimate of the vectorial coefficients In this Section we estimate the vectorial coefficients of the last three individual terms in A and (24). For estimating the maximal possible absolute value of the coefficients β′ δ′ A, we replace R by the unit matrix. Then, by inserting (23) into (18) - (21) we obtain A, γ ′ A = −MAJ A α′ 2 P 2 A 1 dA" 1 − (σ · e3)2 − 4 (dA · e3)2 d2 A ! dA + 2 (dA · e3) e3 −2 (σ · e3) (dA · e3) σ# , A = −2 MA J A β′ 2 P 2 A 1 d2 A (σ · e3) (dA · e3) dA , A = −MA J A γ ′ 2 P 2 A 1 d3 A h(dA · e3)2 dA − (σ · e3)2 d2 AdAi , A = 2 MA J A δ′ 2 P 2 A "(σ · e3)2 σ + 2 d2 A (σ · e3) (dA · e3) dA − (σ · e3) e3# , (25) (26) (27) (28) where e3 is the unit direction along the axis of symmetry (rotation). Here, (σ · e3) and (dA · e3) are the projections of the vectors σ and dA, respectively, on the axis of symmetry. With the aid of (26) - (28) we can explicitly determine the maximal absolute values of the last three individual terms in (24): J A J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) A≤ 2 MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) β′ 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) A = MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) γ ′ 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) A≤ 2 MA(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) δ′ J A dA · e3 P 2 A , J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) P 2 A σ · e3 (dA · e3)2 A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ≤ MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) A (σ · e3)2 + 2(σ · e3) (dA · e3) dA ≤ MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) − (σ · e3)2(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) d2 A dA P 2 P 2 J A P 2 A , 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) + (σ · e3)! ≤ 6 MA(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (29) (30) P 2 A , (31) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (32) where for the estimates (29) and (31) we have taken into account that σ · e3 dA · e3 dA ≤ 1 2 , valid due to σ · dA = 0. Parameter Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune GMA/c2 [m] J A 2 [10−3] PA [106 m] rmin oA [1012 m] GMA J A 2 P 2 A/c2 [1015 m3] 1.40987 0.42215 0.064473 0.076067 14.697 71.492 0.59 16.331 60.268 1.20 3.516 25.559 2.59 3.538 24.764 4.31 0.106 0.025 0.000148 0.000165 TABLE I: Numerical parameters of the giant planets taken from [17, 18]. B. Estimate of the scalar functions Furthermore, from (15) - (17) we deduce the estimates 1(cid:17)2 + 3 (cid:16)rA 1 )5 (rA = 4 1 1 )3 , (rA 3 r1 1 )5 ≤ 3 (rA 1 1 )3 , (rA 1(cid:17)2 c ≤ (cid:16)rA EA FA c ≤ dA VA c 1 1 )3 . (rA = By inserting these estimates (29) - (31) and (33) - (35) into (24) we get G c2 β′ A EA c ≤ 4 G c2 γ ′ A FA c ≤ 3 G c2 δ′ A VA c ≤ 6 G G c2 MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) c2 MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) c2 MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) G J A P 2 A 1 (rA min 1 )3 , P 2 A 1 (rA min 1 )3 , P 2 A 1 (rA min 1 )3 . J A J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 8 (33) (34) (35) (36) (37) (38) The quantity rA min 1 represents the minimal distance between the object A and the observer. C. Collection of all terms Table I summarizes physical parameters of the giant planets. In this Table and in the following discussions we use values of rA min computed under assumption that the observer is within a few million kilometers from the Earth's orbit. From the values given in Table I 1 and (36) - (38) we deduce (for these estimates γ = 1) G c2 "β′ A EA c A FA c + γ ′ A VA + δ′ c #≤ 1.61 × 10−9 µas ≤ 4.52 × 10−11 µas ≤ 2.64 × 10−14 µas ≤ 7.66 × 10−15 µas 9 (39) for Jupiter , for Saturn , for Uranus , for Neptune . Obviously, by comparing the estimates given in (39) with the envisaged accuracy of 1µas we EA and γ ′ VA, can can conclude that these last three terms in (13), i.e. β′ A A safely be neglected. Accordingly, for Gaia mission, the simplified quadrupole light deflection for stars and quasars valid on microarcsecond level of accuracy, reads FA and δ′ A δσQ = 1 + γ 2 G c2 XA α′ A UA c , (40) with UA given by (14) and α′ A given by (18). V. AN UPPER ESTIMATE OF THE QUADRUPOLE LIGHT DEFLECTION FOR STARS AND QUASARS The simplified expression of quadrupole light deflection (40) it still complicated. In order to avoid evaluation of this term for each object in the data reduction, a simple criterion is needed which allows one, with a few additional arithmetical operations, to judge if the quadrupole light deflection should be computed for a given source and for a given accuracy. To deduce such a criterion, we first evaluate the absolute value of the vectorial coefficient (25), A = MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) α′ J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) P 2 A(cid:16)1 − (σ · e3)2(cid:17) , (41) which yields for the absolute value of light deflection angle caused by the quadrupole field of an massive object A δσA Q = 1 + γ GMA 2 c2 P 2 A(cid:16)1 − (σ · e3)2(cid:17) 1 d3 A 2 + 3   1 1(cid:17)3 1 )3  1 − (cid:16)σ · rA σ · rA  rA (rA . (42) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) A comparison of (42) with the absolute value of spherically symmetric part given in (7) and taking into account the fact 1(cid:17)3 1 − (cid:16)σ · rA σ · rA 1 )3 + 2 ≤ rA (rA 1 3 9 4 1 + 1 σ · rA 1 ! , rA we obtain the criterion δσA Q ≤ 9 8 P 2 A d2 A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:16)1 − (σ · e3)2(cid:17) δσA pN . (43) (44) Due to 1 ≥ (σ · e3)2, the estimate (44) can be further approximated by δσA Q(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ≤ 9 8 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) P 2 A d2 A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) δσA . pN(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) This criterion relates the quadrupole light deflection for stars and quasars to the simpler case of spherically symmetric part given in (7). It is recommended for Gaia to use (45) as a criterion if the quadrupole light deflection has to be computed for a given star or quasar. 10 (45) Eq. (42) can be used to estimate (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) Q(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 2 (1 + γ) GMA δσA directly: (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) δσA Q(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ≤ c2 where we have used 2 + 3 cos α − cos3 α ≤ 4. The estimate (46) coincides with [10] (see Eq. (41) and the sentence below in that reference). P 2 A d3 A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ≤ 2 (1 + γ) GMA c2 PA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) , (46) VI. THE QUADRUPOLE LIGHT DEFLECTION FOR SOLAR SYSTEM OBJECTS The quadrupole light deflection for solar system objects δkQ is defined by Eqs. (36) -- (47) and (69) of [12]. Using Eq. (9) it can be written as [13]: δkQ =XA δkA Q , δkA Q = 1 + γ 2 G c2 "α′′ AAA(t1) c + β′′ A BA(t1) c + γ ′′ A CA(t1) c + δ′′ A DA(t1) c # , (47) where the sum in (47) runs over the massive bodies A of solar system. The scalar functions are dA 1 )3 (rA 1 − k · rA 2 rA 1 )2 , (rA 1 − k · rA 1 , 1 0 1 0 1 1 = = rA 0 1 rA 1 1 dA AA c R 1 R k · rA 0 )3 − (rA R 1 0 )3 − (rA R k · rA 1 0 − =− rA rA 0 + k · rA 1 + k · rA rA 1 ! + 0 − rA 0 − k · rA rA 1 − k · rA 1(cid:17)2 1(cid:17)2 − 3 (cid:16)k · rA 1 )3 ! + (cid:16)rA k · rA 1 )5 (rA (rA k · rA 1 )3! − 3 dA 1 1 )5 , (rA (rA k · rA 1 ! − 1 1 )3 , rA (rA and the time-independent vectorial coefficients are BA c CA c DA c 1 d2 A dA = 0 1 1 α′′ k A = −M A ij ki kj dk A dA + 2 M A kj β ′′ k A = 2M A ij ki dj A dk A d2 A , dj A dA − 2 M A ij ki kk dj A dA − 4 M A ij A dj di A dk d3 A , (48) (49) (50) (51) (52) (53) A = M A γ ′′ k ij A dj A dk di A d3 A − M A ij ki kj dk A dA , δ′′ k A = −2 M A ij ki kj kk + 2 M A kj kj − 4 M A ij ki dj A dk A d2 A 11 (54) (55) . In the following we will investigate how (47) can be simplified for a goal accuracy of 1 µas and taking into account that in the case of Gaia the observer is situated within a few million kilometers from the Earth's orbit. VII. APPROXIMATION OF QUADRUPOLE LIGHT DEFLECTION FOR SOLAR SYSTEM OBJECTS To determine the magnitude of the individual terms in (47) we first notice the estimate δkQ≤ 1 + γ 2 G c2 XA α′′ A AA c + β′′ A BA c + γ ′′ A CA c c ! . A DA + δ′′ (56) Since δkQ is perpendicular to k the absolute value δkQ(t1) gives, in the adopted post- Newtonian approximation, the change of the calculated or observed direction to a solar system object due to the quadrupole light deflection. A. Estimate of the vectorial coefficients In order to estimate the maximal value of vectorial coefficients we make use of the diago- nalized form of quadrupole moment given in (23), which yields for the vectorial coefficients (52) - (55) A = −MA J A α′′ 2 P 2 A 1 d A" 1 − (k · e3)2 − 4 (dA · e3)2 d2 A (57) (58) (59) A = −2 MA J A β′′ +2 (dA · e3) e3 − 2 (k · e3) (dA · e3) k + A (cid:20)(k · e3) (dA · e3) dA − A h(dA · e3)2 dA − (k · e3)2 d2 2 P 2 A 2 P 2 A 1 d3 1 d2 1 3 A = −MA J A γ ′′ 2 3 ! dA (k · dA) k#, (k · dA) dA(cid:21) , A dAi , δ′′ = 2 MA J A 2 P 2 A "(k · e3)2 k + 2 d2 A (k · e3) (dA · e3) dA − (k · e3) e3 − 2 3 1 d2 A (k · dA) dA# , (60) where k· e3 and dA · e3 are the projections of the vectors k and dA, respectively, on the axis of symmetry. From (58) - (60) we deduce the following absolute values for the last three vectorial coefficients, 12 P 2 A , + dA 1 3 P 2 P 2 d2 A J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) k · dA dA ! ≤ MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ≤ MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) A k · e3 dA · e3 dA · e32 A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) − k · e32(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 1 A(cid:20) 4 A (cid:16)3 (k · e3)3 − (k · e3)(cid:17) (k · dA) (dA · e3) d2 (k · dA)2 (k · e3)2 − (k · e3)4 + (k · e3)2 + − P 2 A , 3 1 d2 A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) P 2 A , J A P 2 4 3 J A J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) A ≤ 2 MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) β′′ A = MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) γ ′′ 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) A = 2 MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) δ′′ 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ≤ MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A J A where for the estimates (61) and (63) we have taken into account that k · e3 dA · e3 dA ≤ (k · e3)2 − (k · e3)4 ≤ 1 2 1 4 , . (61) (62) 4 9 1 d2 A (k · dA)2(cid:21)1/2 (63) (64) (65) The first estimate uses the fact that in post-Newtonian order k · dA = 0. B. Estimate of the scalar funtions In the following we estimate the magnitude of the scalar functions (49) - (51). The coefficient given in (49) can be written as follows, 1. Estimate of BA = BA c 0 · rA Inserting the definition of vector k yields 1 q(rA 1 1 )2 − 2 rA 0 )2 + (rA k · rA 0 )3 − (rA 0 1(cid:17)2 1 )3 ! + (cid:16)rA k · rA (rA 1 1(cid:17)2 − 3(cid:16)k · rA 1 )5 (rA . (66) 1 rA 0 1 )2 cos α + (rA rA 1 0 )2 cos α − (rA 1 0 − rA 1 rA 1 ! BA c = , (rA (rA 1 1 )2 − 2 rA 0 · rA 1(cid:17)2 − 3(cid:16)k · rA 1 )5 0 )2 + (rA 1(cid:17)2 +(cid:16)rA rA 1 · rA rA 1 rA x2 + y2 − 2 x y cos α x 1 0 0 where cos α = (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) . By means of the inequality (with x = rA 0 , y = rA 1 ) y2 cos α + y x2 cos α − 1 x − x + y x2 y2 ≤ 1 y!(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (67) (68) valid for any x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0, we obtain the estimate 1 BA c ≤ rA 0 + rA 0 )2 (rA (rA 1 1 )2 + 4 1 )3 ≤ (rA dA (rA 1 )2 + 1 A rA d2 1 + 4 1 )3 . (rA The coefficient given in (50) can be written as follows, 2. Estimate of CA CA c = Since dA (rA 0 )3 (rA 1 )3 1(cid:17)3 (cid:16)rA 0 )2 + (rA 0(cid:17)3 −(cid:16)rA 1 )2 − 2 rA 0 · rA 1 q(rA − 3 dA 1 k · rA 1 )5 . (rA q(rA 1 ≤ 1 q(rA 1 )2 − 2 rA 0 )2 + (rA 0 · rA 0(cid:17)3 1(cid:17)3 (cid:16)rA −(cid:16)rA 0 − rA rA 1 0 )3 (rA 1 )3 (rA dA 1 0 − rA 1 )2 , + 3 dA 1 )4 . (rA we find for the absolute value CA c ≤ By means of the inequality that is valid for any x and y, we obtain the estimate x3 − y3 x − y ≤ 3 2 (cid:16)x2 + y2(cid:17) CA c ≤ 3 2 0(cid:17)2 1(cid:17)2 dA (cid:16)rA +(cid:16)rA 1 )3 + 3 0 )3 (rA (rA dA 1 )4 ≤ (rA 3 2 1 1 )3 + (rA 3 2 1 A rA d2 1 + 3 dA 1 )4 . (rA The coefficient given in (51) can be written as follows, 3. Estimate of DA DA c = − 1 d2 A 1 0 )2 + (rA 1 )2 − 2 rA 0 · rA 1 q(rA Inserting the definition of vector k yields k · rA 0 − rA 0 1 k · rA 1 ! − rA 1 1 )3 . (rA = − With the aid of the inequality DA c 1 d2 A 0 cos α + rA rA 0 )2 + (rA (rA 1 cos α − rA 1 )2 − 2 rA 0 − rA 0 · rA 1 1 1 1 )3 . (rA − (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) x cos α + y cos α − x − y x2 + y2 − 2 x y cos α (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 2 x + y ≤ valid for x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0, we obtain the estimate 1 + rA 1 DA c ≤ 2 1 d2 A 1 1 )3 . (rA 13 (69) (70) (71) (72) (73) (74) (75) (76) (77) (78) C. Collection of all terms Altogether, by inserting the estimates of vectorial coefficients, (61) - (63), and the scalar coefficients (69), (74), (78) into (56) yields 14 c G G J A c2 β′′ A BA 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) c2 MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ≤ c2 MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A ≤ G P 2 A CA + γ ′′ A "9 A "9 c 1 A rA d2 1 1 P 2 P 2 2 2 + δ′′ + c ! A DA 1 )2 + 1 dA (rA 1 + A rA min 1 PA (rA min 1 13 2 1 1 )3 + 3 (rA )2 + 19 2 (rA min 1 dA (rA 1 1 )4# )3# , (79) where we have used that PA ≤ dA ≤ rA 1 . Note, in the last line of (79) the first term in the brackets is at least by a factor of ∼ 104 larger than the other two terms. Using the parameters given in Table I we obtain for the giant planets (γ can be safely set to unity for these estimates) G c2 β′′ A BA c + γ ′′ A CA c + δ′′ A DA c ! ≤ 3.26 × 10−2µas ≤ 5.32 × 10−3µas ≤ 8.11 × 10−4µas ≤ 5.79 × 10−5µas for Jupiter , for Saturn , for Uranus , for Neptune . (80) In view of these estimates, for the envisaged accuracy of 1 µas the quadrupole light deflection (47) for sources in the solar system can be approximated by A AA α′′ c δkQ = 1 + γ (81) G 2 , c2 XA with AA given by (48) and α′′ A given by (52). VIII. AN UPPER ESTIMATE OF THE QUADRUPOLE LIGHT DEFLECTION FOR SOLAR SYSTEM OBJECTS The simplified expression of quadrupole light deflection for solar system objects (81) it still complicated. In order to avoid evaluation of this term for each object in the data reduction, a simple criterion is needed which allows one, with a few additional arithmetical operations, to judge if the quadrupole light deflection should be computed for a given source and for a given accuracy. To deduce such a criterion, we first consider the absolute value of the vectorial coefficient (57) given by so that an estimate of the absolute value of one term in (81) is A = MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) α′′ c2 MA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) G J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A δkA Q = P 2 A(cid:16)1 − (σ · e3)2(cid:17) , P 2 A (cid:16)1 − (σ · e3)2(cid:17) AA c (82) (83) , where the scalar coefficient AA is given in (48). According to Eq. (12) we have and we obtain 0(cid:17)2 (cid:16)k × rA 1(cid:17)2 =(cid:16)k × rA = d2 A + O(cid:16)c−2(cid:17) , = 1 d3 A AA c 1 R 1 rA 0(cid:17)2 0 + k · rA − 1(cid:17)(cid:16)rA 1 − k · rA R , and collecting all terms together we obtain 0 (cid:16)rA A (cid:16)2 rA 1 1 )3 (rA 1 d3 1 rA + 1 (cid:16)rA 1 + k · rA 1(cid:17)2 1 + k · rA . 1(cid:17)2! Using k = R 15 (84) (85) AA(t1) c = 1 d3 A 1 R3 (1 − cos α)2 (cid:18)2 (cid:16)rA 0(cid:17)3 1(cid:17)2 +(cid:16)rA rA 0(cid:17)2 0 + 2 (cid:16)rA rA 0(cid:17)3 1 +(cid:16)rA cos α(cid:19) . (86) By means of the inequality (see Appendix A for a proof) (1 − cos α)2 2x3 + xy2 + 2x2y + x3 cos α (x2 + y2 − 2xy cos α)3/2 ≤ 3 valid for any x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0 and with the aid of x (x2 + y2 − 2xy cos α)1/2 sin2 α 1 + cos α , (87) we obtain the estimate, rA 0 R sin α = dA rA 1 , AA c ≤ 3 1 rA 1 1 d2 A sin α 1 + cos α , and, therefore, with the aid of (81) and (82) we achieve δkA Q≤ 3 (1 + γ) GMA 2 c2 1 d2 A This result can be related to the spherically symmetric part, given in (11). By comparison between (90) and (11) we obtain the criterion 1 rA 1 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) P 2 A (cid:16)1 − (σ · e3)2(cid:17) sin α 1 + cos α . (88) (89) (90) (91) (92) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) δkA Q(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)≤ 3 2 P 2 A d2 A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:16)1 − (σ · e3)2(cid:17) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) δkA . pN(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) Due to 1 ≥ (σ · e3)2, the estimate (91) can be further approximated by δkA Q ≤ 3 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) P 2 A δkA A d2 pN . This criterion relates the quadrupole light deflection of sources in the solar system to the simpler case of spherically symmetric part. For Gaia it is recommended to use (92) as a criterion if the quadrupole light deflection has to be calculated for a given solar system object. The estimate of the monopole light deflection for solar system objects can be written as follows: 16 2 (1 + γ) GMA 2 (1 + γ) GMA ≤ (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) δkA pN(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)≤ c2 dA which can be used in the case when δkA pN is not available; the proof of (93) is straight- forward by means of (11). From (83) and (86) one can directly see that (for a proof see Appendix (B)) c2 PA , (93) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) δkA Q(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)≤ 2 (1 + γ) where we have used PA ≤ dA. GMA c2 P 2 A A J2 ≤ 2 (1 + γ) d3 GMA c2 PA J2 , (94) IX. SHAPIRO EFFECT FOR SOLAR SYSTEM OBJECTS In this Section, for reasons of completeness, the known analytical expressions of quadrupole Shapiro effect will be reconsidered, which is also of practical interest for as- trometric missions in nearest future; e.g. BepiColumbo or Juno require modelling of the light travel time at the level of millimeters. From Eq. (1) we obtain for the Shapiro effect in post-Newtonian order the expression where cτ = c(t1 − t0) and cτ = R + cXi δτi + O(cid:16)c−4(cid:17) , c δτi = −k · ∆xi(t1) . In order to show (95) and (96) we have used (cf. Eq. (23) of [10]) σ = k − R−1 k × Xi ∆xi(t1) × k! + O(cid:16)c−4(cid:17) . (95) (96) (97) The sum in (95) runs over the terms of the metric caused by the massive body (e.g. spherical symmetric term, quadrupole term and higher multipole terms etc.). Here, for our purposes it will be sufficient to consider the spherical symmetric and quadrupole part. The spherical symmetric term of Shapiro effect is given by c δτpN =−k · ∆pN x(t1) = XA c δτ A pN , c δτ A pN = (1 + γ) G c2 MA log rA 0 + rA rA 0 + rA 1 + R 1 − R , (98) where the sum runs over all massive bodies A under consideration. The quadrupole term of Shapiro effect is given by c δτQ = −k · ∆Q x(t1) = XA c δτ A Q . (99) The expression ∆Q x(t1) has been given in [12]. Accordingly, the Shapiro effect for quadrupole gravitational fields of one massive solar system body A is given by 17 c δτ A Q = 1 + γ 2 G c2 (δA VA + βA EA + γA FA) , with the scalar functions 1 k · rA 1 )3 , (rA 1 (rA 0 k · rA EA = 0 )3 − (rA FA = dA 1 VA =− 1 d2 0 )3 − (rA A k · rA 0 − rA 0 1 )3! , k · rA 1 ! , rA 1 and the time-independent scalar coefficients are di A dA dj A dA , βA = M A γA = 2 M A ij ij ki kj − M A ij ki dj A dA , δA = M A ij ki kj + 2 M A ij di A dA dj A dA . (100) (101) (102) (103) (104) (105) (106) Note, the impact vector can be computet by means of Eq. (12). In Appendix C we show the following estimates: G MA G c2 δA VA ≤ G c2 βA EA + γA FA ≤ (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) c2 J A P 2 A d2 A G MA 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) c2 , (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) P 2 A 0 )2 + (rA P 2 A (rA 1 )2! . (107) (108) 0 , rA 1 , we conclude the inequality These estimates imply that (100) cannot be simplified for the general case. Furthermore, from these relations, because of PA ≤ dA, rA Q (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)≤ 3 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) which represents a strict upper bound of quadrupole Shapiro effect and improves the estimate given in Eq. (47) in [10]. This estimate implies that for quadrupole light deflection there is a maximal numerical value which depends only on physical parameters of the massive body, but not on distance dA. Numerical values of the estimate (109) for the giant planets are given in Table II. 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) G MA c δτ A (109) J A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) c2 , X. NUMERICAL TESTS The obtained simplified formulas given by Eq. (40) for stars/quasars and by Eq. (81) for solar system objects and the a priori criteria given for these objects by Eq. (45) and (92), Parameter Sun Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune 18 G MA c2 [mm] 0.89 62.16 20.68 0.68 0.81 3 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) TABLE II: Numerical values of estimate (109). For the Sun a value J ⊙ adopted [19]; GM⊙/c2 = 1476 m. 2 = 2 × 10−7 has been respectively, have been incorporated into the current reference C implementation of GREM as described by Klioner & Blankenburg [13] and Klioner [14]. Numerical experiments with the C implementation have confirmed the correctness and the efficiency of the estimates and criteria. In the experiments we used about 108 objects (both randomly distributed over the sky and specially generated to give grazing rays to the giant planets). The results can be summarized as follows: I. Stars and quasars. -- The maximal difference between the full quadrupole deflection formula (13) and the simplified one (40) amounts to 1.1× 10−10 µas in good agreements with (39). Hence, the actual values of the neglected terms are in case of Gaia about 10 -- 15 times less than given by (39). -- The upper estimate (45) holds and is attainable for randomly distributed sources. -- The mean value of the ratio between the actual value of the quadrupole light deflection and its upper estimate (45) amounts to 0.48 for randomly distributed sources that indicates the high numerical efficiency of the estimate. II. Solar system objects. -- The maximal difference between the full quadrupole deflection formula (47) and the simplified one (81) amounts to 0.0017 µas in good agreements with (80). Therefore, the actual values of the neglected terms are again about 10 -- 15 times less than given by (80). -- The upper estimate (92) holds and is attainable for randomly distributed sources. -- The mean value of the ratio between the actual value of the quadrupole light deflection and its upper estimate (92) amounts to 0.40 for randomly distributed sources that again indicates the high numerical efficiency of the estimate. III. Quadrupole Shapiro effect. -- A strict upper estimate of quadrupole Shapiro effect is given in Eq. (109). Implementation of the criteria (45) and (92) has allowed to significantly reduce the num- ber of "false alarms" (cases for which the full quadrupole deflection has been computed and turned out to be much smaller than the requested goal accuracy). The "false alarms" were caused by the use of a more primitive ad hoc criteria implemented in the C code of GREM previously. This, in turn, slightly increases the performance of the GREM implementation. 19 Let us summarize the results of this report. XI. SUMMARY 1. Quadrupole light deflection (13) for stars and quasars is approximated by (40). 2. Eqs. (45) and (46) can be used as an a priori criterion if the quadrupole light deflection (40) has to be computed for a given source. 3. Quadrupole light deflection (47) for solar system sources is approximated by (81). 4. Eqs. (92) and (94) can be used as an a priori criterion if the quadrupole light deflection (81) has to be computed for a given solar system object. 5. A strict criterion of quadrupole Shapiro effect has been given in Eq. (109), which improves the estimate given in Eq. (47) of [10]. Our investigations, i.e. the simplified quadrupole formulas and the criteria, provide a highly time-efficient tool for data reduction on microarcsecond level of accuracy for Gaia mission. [1] O.S. Ivanitskaya, Lorentz Basis and Gravitational Effects in Einstein's Theory of Gravitation (1979) Nauka i Tekhnika, Minsk (in Russian). [2] Chr. Le Poncin-Lafitte, P. Teyssandier, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 044029. [3] S.M. Kopeikin, J. Math. Phys. 38 (1997) 2587. [4] S.M. Kopeikin, P. Korobkov, A. Polnarev, Class. Quantum Grav. 23 (2006) 4299. [5] S.M. Kopeikin, V.V. Makarov, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 062002. [6] R. Epstein, I.I. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2947. [7] G.W. Richter, A. Matzner, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 1219. [8] G.W. Richter, A. Matzner, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 2549. [9] S.A. Cowling, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 209 (1984) 415. [10] S.A. Klioner, Sov. Astron., 35 (1991) 523. [11] S.A. Klioner, S.M. Kopejkin, AJ 104 (1992) 897. [12] S.A. Klioner, AJ 125 (2003) 1580. [13] S.A. Klioner, (2003) Technical R. Blankenburg on tion of http://www.rssd.esa.int/llink/livelink. the Gaia relativistic model, available report implementa- from the Gaia document archive the [14] S.A. Klioner (2003) Technical report on the implementation of the Gaia relativis- tic model, Amendment for version 1.0g, available from the Gaia document archive http://www.rssd.esa.int/llink/livelink. [15] G.W. Richter, A. Matzner, Phys. Rev. D 28 (1982) 3007. [16] S.A. Klioner, S. Zschocke, Class. Quantum Grav. 27 (2001) 075015. [17] IERS Conventions (2003). D.D. McCarthy, G. Petit, IERS Conventions (IERS Technical Note 32) Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des Bundesamts fur Kartographie und Geodasie, 2004, 127 pp. [18] P.R. Weissman, L.-A. McFadden, T.V. Johnson, Encyclopedia of the Solar System, (San Diego: Academic) eds. 1999. [19] A. Fienga, H. Manche, J. Laskar, M. Gastineau, A new numerical planetary ephemeris, A&A 477 (2008) 315. 20 Appendix A: Proof of Eq. (87) In this Appendix we prove the inequality (87). The latter can be rewritten as (1 − cos α)2 (2x3 + x y2 + 2x2 y + x3 cos α)≤ 3 x (x2 + y2 − 2xy cos α) (1 − cos α) . Denoting z = x/y we obtain the relation f1 ≡−1 − 2 z2 + 2 z − cos α + 4 z cos α − cos2 α − z2 cos α ≤ 0 . 21 (A1) (A2) To prove the inequality (A2) it is sufficient to investigate the values of f at extrema and at the boundaries given by z ≥ 0 and 0 ≤ α ≤ π. To determine the extrema of this function we set the first derivatives zero, f1 , z = −4 z + 2 + 4 cos α − 2 z cos α = 0 , f1 , α = sin α (1 − 4 z + 2 cos α + z2) = 0 . The only solutions of the coupled system (A3), (A4) are P1 = (z = 0, α = 2 3 π) , P2 = (z = 1, α = 0) . The values of f1 at these points are At the boundaries we get f1(P1) = − 3 4 , f1(P2) = 0 . f1(z = 0) =−1 − cos α − cos2 α < 0 , f1(z → ∞) =−z2(2 + cos α) < 0 , f1(α = 0) =−3(1 − z)2 ≤ 0 , f1(α = π) =−z(z + 2) ≤ 0 . (A3) (A4) (A5) (A6) (A7) (A8) (A9) (A10) From the results (A5) - (A10) we conclude the validity of the inequality (A2) and (A1). Appendix B: Proof of Eq. (94) From (83) it is clear that (94) is true if for AA defined by (86) one has AA(t1) c ≤ 4 d3 A . To prove this it is sufficient to demonstrate that 1 R3 (1 − cos α)2 (cid:18)2 (cid:16)rA 0(cid:17)3 1(cid:17)2 +(cid:16)rA rA 0(cid:17)2 0 + 2 (cid:16)rA rA 0(cid:17)3 1 +(cid:16)rA cos α(cid:19)≤ 4 , (B1) (B2) or introducing again z = rA 1 0 /rA (1 − cos α)2 z ((1 + z)2 + z2 (1 + cos α)) 4 (1 + z2 − 2z cos α)3/2 f2 ≡ The derivatives of f2 with respect to α and z vanish simultaneously only for α = 0 which is one of the boundaries. At the boundaries we get 22 (B3) ≤ 1 . f2(z = 0) = 0 , 1 4 f2(α = 0) = 0 , lim z→∞ f2 = f2(α = π) = z 1 + z ≤ 1 . (1 − cos α)2 (2 + cos α) ≤ 1 , From this we conclude that (B2) and, therefore, (B1) and (94) are valid. Appendix C: Proof of inequalities (107) and (108) First, we consider the inequality (107), which is given by G c2 δA VA = ≤ 1 d2 1 d2 A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) M A ij ki kj + 2 M A ij di A dA M A ij ki kj + 2 M A ij di A dA 1 k · rA rA 1 !(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 0 dj dj A dA! k · rA 0 − rA dA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) , where the inequality in (C2) is obvious. By inserting (23) into (C2) we obtain G c2 δA VA ≤ G MA c2 Using the inequality (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) P 2 A d2 A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 1 − (k · e3)2 − 2 (dA · e3)2 d2 A . (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (B4) (B5) (B6) (B7) (C1) (C2) (C3) (C4) 1 − (k · e3)2 − 2 (dA · e3)2 d2 A ≤ 1 , (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) which can be shown by introducing spherical coordinates and taking into account that in post-Newtonian order k and dA are perpendicular to each other (cf. proof of Eq. (C10)), we find G c2 δA VA ≤ G MA c2 P 2 A d2 A . (C5) Now, we consider the inequality (108). From the definitions of the functions (101) and (102) and of the scalar coefficients (104) - (105), we obtain G c2 βA EA + γA FA di M A A dA ij ki kj − M A ij f3 0 )2 + (rA f4 1 )2 , (rA =(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ≤ dj A dA! k · rA 0 )3 − (rA 0 1 k · rA 1 )3 ! + 2 M A (rA ij ki dj A dA dA 0 )3 − (rA dA (rA 1 )3!(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (C6) where the functions are given by ij ki kj − M A ij ij ki kj − M A ij di A dA di A dA 0 dj A rA 0 dA! k · rA dA! k · rA dj A rA 1 1 + 2 M A + 2 M A ij ki dj A dA ij ki dj A dA M A M A f3 =(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) f4 =(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) dA rA dA rA 0 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 1 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) Now we consider function f3 (proof for function f4 is very similar). Inserting (23) into (C7) yields 23 (C7) (C8) , . dA rA 0 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 1 )2! , P 2 A (rA ≤ 1 , (C10) (C11) Using the inequality (see below) f3 = J A G MA 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) A (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) c2 P 2 (dA · e3)2 d2 A h =(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) we find (dA · e3)2 d2 A − (k · e3)2! k · rA 0 0 − 2 (k · e3) rA (dA · e3) dA dA rA 0 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) . (C9) − (k · e3)2! k · rA 0 0 − 2 (k · e3) rA (dA · e3) dA G c2 βA EA + γA FA ≤ G MA c2 which is just relation (108). P 2 A 0 )2 + (rA (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) J A 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) In order to complete the proof of (C11), we still have to show relation (C10). For that we introduce spherical coordinates as follows: dA = (0, 0, dA)T, k = (cos φ1 , sin φ1 , 0)T and e3 = (sin θ cos φ2 , sin θ sin φ2 , cos θ)T, where we have taken into account that in post- Newtonian order dA and k are perpendicular to each other. Accordingly, we have dA · e3 = dA cos θ and k · e3 = sin θ (cos φ1 cos φ2 + sin φ1 sin φ2), and by inserting into Eq. (C10) we obtain h =(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:16)cos2 θ − sin2 θ cos2 α(cid:17) cos Φ − 2 (cos θ sin θ cos α) sin Φ(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) k · rA rA 0 0 = cos Φ and dA rA 0 where we have used = sin Φ, and the addition theorem of cosine and sine function: cos φ1 cos φ2 + sin φ1 sin φ2 = cos α where α = φ1 − φ2. The expression in (C12) can be estimated by A cos Φ + B sin Φ ≤ √A2 + B2; accordingly we obtain: , (C12) h≤ cos2 θ + sin2 θ cos2 α ≤ cos2 θ + sin2 θ = 1 . (C13) Thus, we have shown relation (C10).
1811.09628	3	1811	2019-03-18T01:01:46	Multiple Spiral Arms in Protoplanetary Disks: Linear Theory	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Recent observations of protoplanetary disks, as well as simulations of planet-disk interaction, have suggested that a single planet may excite multiple spiral arms in the disk, in contrast to the previous expectations based on linear theory (predicting a one-armed density wave). We re-assess the origin of multiple arms in the framework of linear theory, by solving for the global two-dimensional response of a non-barotropic disk to an orbiting planet. We show that the formation of a secondary arm in the inner disk, at about half of the orbital radius of the planet, is a robust prediction of linear theory. This arm becomes stronger than the primary spiral at several tenths of the orbital radius of the planet. Several additional, weaker spiral arms may also form in the inner disk. On the contrary, a secondary spiral arm is unlikely to form in the outer disk. Our linear calculations, fully accounting for the global behavior of both the phases and amplitudes of perturbations, generally support the recently proposed WKB phase argument for the secondary arm origin (as caused by the intricacy of constructive interference of azimuthal harmonics of the perturbation at different radii). We provide analytical arguments showing that the process of a single spiral wake splitting up into multiple arms is a generic linear outcome of wave propagation in differentially rotating disks. It is not unique to planet-driven waves and occurs also in linear calculations of spiral wakes freely propagating with no external torques. These results are relevant for understanding formation of multiple rings and gaps in protoplanetary disks.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version March 19, 2019 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 MULTIPLE SPIRAL ARMS IN PROTOPLANETARY DISKS: LINEAR THEORY Ryan Miranda1,3 and Roman R. Rafikov1,2 Draft version March 19, 2019 ABSTRACT Recent observations of protoplanetary disks, as well as simulations of planet-disk interaction, have suggested that a single planet may excite multiple spiral arms in the disk, in contrast to the previous expectations based on linear theory (predicting a one-armed density wave). We re-assess the origin of multiple arms in the framework of linear theory, by solving for the global two-dimensional response of a non-barotropic disk to an orbiting planet. We show that the formation of a secondary arm in the inner disk, at about half of the orbital radius of the planet, is a robust prediction of linear theory. This arm becomes stronger than the primary spiral at several tenths of the orbital radius of the planet. Several additional, weaker spiral arms may also form in the inner disk. On the contrary, a secondary spiral arm is unlikely to form in the outer disk. Our linear calculations, fully accounting for the global behavior of both the phases and amplitudes of perturbations, generally support the recently proposed WKB phase argument for the secondary arm origin (as caused by the intricacy of constructive interference of azimuthal harmonics of the perturbation at different radii). We provide analytical arguments showing that the process of a single spiral wake splitting up into multiple arms is a generic linear outcome of wave propagation in differentially rotating disks. It is not unique to planet-driven waves and occurs also in linear calculations of spiral wakes freely propagating with no external torques. These results are relevant for understanding formation of multiple rings and gaps in protoplanetary disks. Subject headings: hydrodynamics -- protoplanetary disks -- planet -- disk interactions -- waves 1. INTRODUCTION The gravitational interaction of young planets with their natal disks is known to produce spiral density waves. Recent high-resolution direct imaging has re- vealed spiral structures in several protoplanetary disks, including MWC 758 (Grady et al. 2013; Benisty et al. 2015), HD 100453 (Wagner et al. 2015, 2018), and SAO 206462 (Muto et al. 2012; Garufi et al. 2013; Stolker et al. 2016; Maire et al. 2017), which may be produced by the gravitational influence of planets or binary companions. A remarkable feature of these disks is that they display pairs of spiral arms separated by approximately 180◦, which has not been expected. Indeed, in the conventional picture of planet-disk in- teractions, a planet is believed to give rise to only a sin- gle spiral arm (Ogilvie & Lubow 2002; Rafikov 2002a). Gravitational perturbations due to a planet excite many wave modes in the disk, each described by an azimuthal number m, and launched at a corresponding Lindblad resonance -- locations interior and exterior to the or- bit of the planet where orbital commensurabilities oc- cur (Goldreich & Tremaine 1979). Ogilvie & Lubow (2002) showed that the these modes interfere construc- tively, leading to a characteristic one-armed spiral pat- tern. In this framework, two planets would be required to produce two arms (Benisty et al. 2015). However, for pairs of arms with similar azimuthal separations to be found in several unrelated protoplanetary disks would 1 Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540 2 Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK 3 [email protected] require fortuitous configurations of the orbital phases of the planets in these systems. Recent three-dimensional simulations of planet-disk in- teractions have demonstrated that some of the observed multiple spiral features can, in fact, be produced by a single orbiting companion (Zhu et al. 2015; Dong et al. 2015b; Fung & Dong 2015; Dong et al. 2016a; Dong & Fung 2017). Notably, the spirals seen in HD 100453 were demonstrated to be consistent with the disturbances pro- duced by the nearby M dwarf companion (Dong et al. 2016b; Wagner et al. 2018). A key finding of these nu- merical studies is that a single planet can produce multi- ple spirals, and so it is not necessary to invoke the pres- ence of multiple planets to explain the appearance of several spiral arms. In some cases, more than two spiral arms are produced. The number of arms, as well as the azimuthal separation of the two strongest spirals, were found numerically to depend on planet mass (Zhu et al. 2015; Fung & Dong 2015; Bae & Zhu 2018b). It was also shown (Bae et al. 2017) that multiple arms can be re- lated to the formation of annular gaps in mm-size dust distribution in protoplanetary disks. At the same time, Arzamasskiy & Rafikov (2018) have recently demonstrated numerically that formation of sec- ondary spirals does not necessarily require the presence of a planet (i.e., an orbiting point mass perturber) driving density waves. In their case, density waves were driven by an imposed boundary condition at the outer edge of the simulation domain and then freely propagated in- ward, without angular momentum injection by external torques. Such passive propagation of the waves suffi- ciently far into the inner disk was found to also naturally result in the formation of a secondary arm. Despite these numerical experiments, the origin of sec- 2 ondary spiral arms has remained elusive. Some nonlinear mechanisms, such as mode coupling (Fung & Dong 2015; Lee 2016) have been proposed to explain their features. Recently, Bae & Zhu (2018a,b) argued that the forma- tion of multiple spirals can be explained by radially- dependent coherence of different azimuthal harmonics of the perturbations driven by a planet, essentially by an extension of the linear mode phase argument of Ogilvie & Lubow (2002). In their work, the phases of the mul- tiple crests of each mode were shown to constructively interfere in different parts of the disk (at different az- imuthal locations) as the wave propagates away from the perturber. The different regions of interference are identified as the primary arm, secondary arm, tertiary arm, and so on. This argument was laid out in terms of the local (WKB) approximation for mode phases and essentially ignored the behavior of the mode amplitudes. Nevertheless, these findings were corroborated by two- dimensional numerical simulations, demonstrating this idea to be a promising step towards understanding the formation of multiple spirals. An important aspect of the work of Bae & Zhu (2018a) is that the emergence of multiple arms was understood, at least in part, within a linear framework. In this paper, we directly apply the linear theory of density wave evolution to self-consistently compute the full two-dimensional structure of the response of a thin, locally isothermal disk to an orbital companion. By prop- erly accounting for the global behavior of the mode am- plitudes as well as their phases (i.e., going beyond the WKB approximation), we show that multiple spiral arms are robustly formed in the inner regions of protoplan- etary disks; under certain circumstances they can also appear in the outer disk. We characterize the morphol- ogy of the spirals (e.g., their amplitudes, widths, and arm-to-arm separations) and its dependence on the disk properties -- its aspect ratio, as well as profiles of the temperature and surface density. The plan of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we describe our setup and the details of our calculations. In Section 3, we present results on the formation of multi- ple spirals by a planet, and characterize the properties of the spirals and their dependence on the disk parame- ters. In Section 4 we present calculations of the passive propagation of a spiral wake in a perturber-free disk, demonstrating that the emergence of a secondary spiral is a generic property of wave propagation in differentially rotating disks. In Section 5 we provide theoretical argu- ments based on linear mode phases in order to under- stand some key aspects of our calculations. We discuss our results in Section 6, and conclude with a summary of our main results in Section 7. 2. PROBLEM FRAMEWORK We consider propagation of density waves in a two- dimensional fluid disk around a star of mass M∗ in the linear regime. The foundations of the mathematical framework for studying this phenomenon were laid out in Goldreich & Tremaine (1979), and we heavily borrow from their results. We explore both the inhomogeneous and homogeneous versions of the problem. In the inhomogeneous case (§3), the wave is explicitly driven by the gravitational potential of a planet of mass Mp (cid:28) M∗ moving on a circular orbit with radius rp and Keplerian frequency Ωp = (GM∗/r3 p)1/2. The torque due to the planetary gravity both excites the wave in the first place and modifies its subsequent propagation. In the homogeneous case, the perturbation is imposed at the edge of the disk with no external torques affect- ing subsequent wave propagation (a setup analogous to Arzamasskiy & Rafikov 2018). This regime is studied using the same mathematical framework as the inhomo- geneous case but with the planetary source terms set to zero (§4). 2.1. Basic Setup We consider a very general disk model in which the entropy S ∝ ln(P/Σγ) is allowed to vary with radius r. Here Σ is the disk surface density, P = Σc2 s /γ is the (height-integrated) pressure, cs is an adiabatic sound speed, and γ is the adiabatic index. We assume that in the unperturbed disk, cs(r) = hprpΩp , (1) where hp is the disk aspect ratio, h(r) = H/r = hp(r/rp)(1−q)/2, evaluated at rp, and H = cs/Ω is the pressure scale height. The exponent q is the power law index of the disk temperature, which is proportional to c2 s . The disk surface density is (cid:19)−q/2 (cid:18) r rp (cid:18) r (cid:19)−p rp Σ(r) = Σp , (2) where the value of Σp is arbitrary. As a result of spec- ifying cs and Σ independently, the entropy S can vary through the disk. The orbital frequency of the disk fluid is modified from the pure Keplerian value ΩK = (GM∗/r3)1/2 by the pres- sure gradient: Ω2 = Ω2 K + 1 rΣ dP dr . (3) The response of the disk is sensitive to the small devi- ations of Ω and the radial epicyclic frequency κ, given by κ2 = 2Ω r d dr (r2Ω), (4) from the Keplerian frequency ΩK. 2.2. Equations and Numerical Procedure The surface density perturbation produced in re- sponse to the gravitational potential of the planet (or the externally-imposed perturbation in the homogenous case) is described in polar coordinates (r, φ) by δΣ(r, φ), which we decompose into Fourier modes according to ∞(cid:88) δΣm(r)eim(φ−φp)(cid:105) (cid:104) δΣ(r, φ) = Re , (5) m=1 where φp = Ωpt is the azimuthal position of the planet (in the homogeneous case, φp → 0). Each δΣm(r) is a complex quantity describing the radial variation of the amplitude and phase of the mode with azimuthal number m. The radial velocity and azimuthal velocity perturba- tions δur(r, φ) and δuφ(r, φ) are similarly expressed as sums of Fourier modes δur,m(r) and δuφ,m(r). 3 is the squared Brunt -- Vaisala frequency, and DS = κ2 − ω2 + N 2 r . Note that in the barotropic (uniform entropy) limit, 1/LS → 0 and Nr → 0, equation (6) reduces to the master equation of Goldreich & Tremaine (1979). The surface density perturbation δΣm can be computed using solutions of equation (6) according to δΣm = Σ c2 s δhm + iΣ LS ω δur,m, (9) where the radial velocity perturbation δur,m is given in terms of δhm and its radial derivative δh(cid:48) m by (cid:20) δur,m = − i DS 2mΩ r (cid:48) ω(δh m + Φ (cid:48) m) (δhm + Φm) − ω LS (cid:21) δhm . (10) The azimuthal velocity perturbation can be found in a similar fashion, (cid:21) δhm . (cid:20) κ2 (cid:18) 2Ω (cid:48) m + Φ (δh (cid:48) m) (cid:19) δuφ,m = − 1 DS mω r N 2 r ω2 1 − (δhm + Φm) − κ2 2ΩLS (11) The components of the gravitational potential of the planet are Φm = − GMp rp b(m) 1/2 (r/rp), (12) (13) (cid:90) 2π 0 where bm 1/2 are (softened) Laplace coefficients, b(m) 1/2 (α) = 1 π cos(mψ)dψ [1 − 2α cos(ψ) + α2 + 2]1/2 . For the softening parameter, we choose = 0.6hp, a value which is typically used in two-dimensional numer- ical simulations of planet-disk interaction to mimic the vertical averaging of the planetary gravity over the disk In our calculations, as in Bae & Zhu (2018a), height. we ignore the "indirect" potential term, δm,1GMpr/r2 p, which arises due to the motion of the central star around the barycenter of the star + planet system. We motivate this choice in Appendix A. We solve equation (6) for a sufficient number of modes to fully capture the two-dimensional structure of the sur- face density perturbations. The mode solution method closely follows that of Korycansky & Pollack (1993) (KP93), as well as Rafikov & Petrovich (2012) and Petro- vich & Rafikov (2012), and is described in detail in Ap- pendix A. The solution is obtained on a logarithmic grid with rin = 0.05rp and rout = 5.0rp, which, for our fidu- cial parameters, has 6×104 grid points, or a resolution of about 1300/H. All of the modes are solved on the same grid to facilitate their synthesis, and the grid resolution is set by the tight winding of the highest m modes near the grid boundaries. Examples of the surface density perturbation profiles δΣm(r) for several low-order azimuthal modes are shown in Fig. 1. Note that modes with higher m are more tightly wound. Also note that here the m = 5 mode has the largest amplitude. This is because the response Fig. 1. -- Radial profiles of the fractional surface density per- turbation for several low-order modes, for the case of the fiducial parameters, hp = 0.1, q = 1, and p = 1. (cid:26) d2 dr2 + As a result of performing these steps, one arrives at the linear equation describing the quantity4 δhm = δPm/Σ (where δPm is the pressure perturbation) of the mode with azimuthal number m (Baruteau & Masset 2008; Tsang 2014; here we adopt the notation of the latter): dr − (δhm + Φm) 2mΩ r ω (cid:20) d (cid:18) rΣ dr LSDS ln (cid:19) (cid:18) ΣΩ (cid:19) DS + 1 LS (cid:21) (cid:21) δhm + 2mΩ LSr ω (cid:19)(cid:21) d (cid:19)(cid:27) ln (cid:20) d (cid:18) rΣ (cid:18) N 2 (cid:20) DS dr m2 r2 DS r ω2 − 1 + c2 s dΦm 1 LS dr = 0, + − + 1 L2 S + 1 LS d dr ln (6) where ω = m(Ωp − Ω) is the Doppler-shifted frequency of the tidal forcing due to the mth harmonic of the plan- etary potential, 1 LS = 1 γ dS dr = (γ − 1)p − q γr (7) is the inverse length scale associated with the radial vari- ation of entropy, (cid:19) dP dr − dΣ dr (cid:18) 1 c2 s c2 s LSr N 2 r = − 1 Σ2 dP dr (q + p) = γ (8) 4 For barotropic disks, δhm can be identified as the enthalpy perturbation. However, in the presence of an entropy gradient, this association no longer holds exactly. Instead, δhm simply serves as a convenient variable for which a master equation can be found. −0.4−0.20.00.20.4(a)m=2ReIm−0.4−0.20.00.20.4(Mp/Mth)−1δΣm/Σ(b)m=50.10.31.03.0r/rp−0.4−0.20.00.20.4(c)m=104 of the disk is dominated by modes with m close to m∗ ≈ (2hp)−1 (here hp = 0.1 and m∗ = 5). The domi- nant role of this characteristic m is related to the torque cutoff phenomenon (Goldreich & Tremaine 1980). The exact form of m∗ (i.e., the factor of 1/2) is not funda- mental, but this choice is supported by our numerical calculations. Once the mode two- dimensional surface density perturbation is then synthe- sized according to solutions are found, the mmax(cid:88) δΣm(r)eim(φ−φp)(cid:105) (cid:104) δΣ(r, φ) = Re , (14) m=1 where mmax is the value of m necessary to achieve a con- verged perturbation structure; see Appendix A for de- tails. The velocity perturbations δur(r, φ) and δuφ(r, φ) are computed in the same manner. Note that the mode perturbation, δΣm(r), is a one-dimensional, complex quantity (described by a radially-varying amplitude and phase), while the synthesized perturbation, δΣ(r, φ) is a two-dimensional, explicitly real quantity. 2.3. Parameters The results of our calculations are fully determined by four dimensionless parameters: hp, the disk aspect ra- tio at the orbital radius of the planet, q, the power law index of the disk temperature, p, the power law index of the disk surface density, and the adiabatic index γ. For the fiducial parameters, we choose hp = 0.1, q = 1 (corresponding to a constant disk aspect ratio h), p = 1, and γ = 7/5. We find that our results are almost com- pletely insensitive to the value of γ (see §3.3), and so unless otherwise stated, we keep its value fixed. We have explored the parameter space by performing calcu- lations for which two of the three remaining parameters are fixed at their fiducial values and the third is varied over a plausible range of values for protoplanetary disks: 0.05 < hp < 0.15, 0 < q < 1, 0 < p < 3/2. We find that the results are not sensitive to p, and so we primarily fo- cus our analysis and discussion on the effects of varying hp and q. 3. RESULTS FOR PLANET-DRIVEN SPIRALS We will start presentation of our results with the case of a spiral pattern driven by the gravity of an embed- ded planet (forced or inhomogeneous case). To better highlight new findings, we start by outlining the existing picture of wave propagation in disks in §3.1. We then describe general properties of the linear planet-driven density waves found in our linear calculations (§3.2) and provide a comparison with the results of direct numeri- cal simulations (§3.4). These preliminaries form a basis for subsequent in-depth discussion of the properties of multiple spiral arms emerging in our calculations in §3.5. 3.1. Expectations Based on Simple Linear Theory Existing linear calculations of the density wave prop- agation in disks provide some guidance on the expected outcome of our present calculation. Specializing to the inhomogeneous case, the linear response of the disk is expected to take a form of a one-armed spiral den- sity wake (Rafikov 2002a; Ogilvie & Lubow 2002). For r − rp (cid:29) Hp, the position of the wake is given approx- imately by5 φlin = φp + sgn(r − rp) Ω(r(cid:48)) − Ωp cs(r(cid:48)) (cid:48) , dr (15) (cid:90) r rp and its amplitude (peak height) is given by, to within a constant factor of order unity (Rafikov 2002a), Mp Mth (cid:20) Ω(r) − Ωp Ωp (cid:21)1/2(cid:20) cs(r) (cid:21)−3/2 cs(rp) Σp Σ(r) rp r δΣlin Σ(r) = × Here Mth = h3 pM∗ (16) . (17) is the thermal mass. The first (constant) factor on the right-hand side of Equation (16) describes the initial am- plitude of the density wake formed within a few scale heights of the planet (in the homogeneous case consid- ered in §4, rp is replaced with the radius at which the perturbation is imposed, and Mp/Mth with an arbitrary constant), while the other factors indicate how the ampli- tude varies as the wake propagates away from the planet. The radial scaling is dictated by the conservation of an- gular momentum flux (AMF), (cid:73) FJ (r) = r2Σ(r) δur(r, φ)δuφ(r, φ)dφ, (18) which in the absence of explicit dissipation (linear or nonlinear) must be constant far from the planet, outside the wave excitation region (Goodman & Rafikov 2001; Rafikov 2002a). The characteristic scale of FJ , result- ing from the sum of the one-sided Lindblad torques, is (Goldreich & Tremaine 1980; Ward 1997) FJ,0 = −3 p Σpr4 h pΩ2 p. (19) (cid:18) Mp (cid:19)2 M∗ These known linear results will be used as a reference for comparison in our current calculations. 3.2. Results of Linear Calculations: General Properties In Figure 2 we show two-dimensional maps of the per- turbed surface density (in polar coordinates r, φ) result- ing from our typical linear calculations. The case with the fiducial parameters is shown (Fig. 2a), as well as sev- eral other cases, discussed in §3.6, in which each of the three parameters (indicated at the top of the panel) is varied from its fiducial value. The same maps of the perturbed surface density are also shown in Cartesian coordinates in Figure 3, in or- der to demonstrate the true geometry of the spirals as seen by an observer sensitive to the gas surface density perturbations. Note that in Figure 3, only the part of the disk interior to the orbit of the planet is shown, and the range of color scale for the perturbations is smaller 5 Note that analogous expression in Rafikov (2002a) has a dif- ferent sign of the second term. 5 Fig. 2. -- The two-dimensional fractional surface density perturbation (scaled by the ratio of the planet mass to the thermal mass), shown in polar coordinates, for the case of the fiducial parameters (hp = 0.1, q = 1, p = 1; left panel), and for several other cases, demonstrating the effect of varying each parameter: the disk aspect ratio, hp (middle-left panel), the temperature power-law index, q (middle-right panel), and the surface density power-law index, p (right panel). The positions of the primary arm, secondary arm, and tertiary arm are indicated in the leftmost panel. than in Figure 2, in order to focus on the detail of the perturbations in the inner disk.6 Also, to highlight the details of the spiral arm evolu- tion, in Figure 4a,b we display azimuthal profiles of δΣ at a fixed radius r, normalized by the linear wake ampli- tude δΣlin given by equation (16). These profiles can be thought of as horizontal cuts in Figure 2. Generically, in the outer disk (r > rp), a single strong spiral arm, i.e., a narrow structure with a δΣ > 0 peak is present. Its azimuthal profile remains relatively un- changed as the arm winds up with increasing r, see Fig- ure 4a. It is accompanied by a comparatively wider sur- face density trough, with δΣ < 0, which trails behind the arm (in the sense of the Keplerian rotation of the disk). The case with a smaller disk aspect ratio, hp = 0.05, represents an exception, as it develops a weak additional spiral arm beyond r ≈ 3rp, although this is not clearly discernible in Figure 2 (see §3.5 for details). In the inner disk (r < rp), there is a single spiral arm (the "primary spiral") near the planet, accompanied by a trough which leads the arm. However, farther from 6 We point out that radially narrow features seen at r ≈ rp in Figs. 2 -- 3 are perturbations in the corotation region which result from the presence of a radial entropy gradient (i.e., due to terms depending on 1/LS in equation 6). As they are very localized near the orbit of the planet and have no effect on the global spiral structure of the disk, we do not examine these features in detail in this work. the planet, the structure of the density wake deviates from the simple behavior seen in the outer disk. For the fiducial parameters, the presence of second peak with δΣ > 0 (the "secondary spiral arm") becomes apparent at r ≈ 0.5rp, accompanied by a deepening of the ini- tial trough, see Figure 4b. Towards smaller radii, the strength of the secondary spiral increases, and it also be- comes accompanied by a leading trough. At even smaller radii (r (cid:46) 0.1rp), a third arm (the "tertiary spiral") forms. These multiple spirals are robustly present for a variety of disk parameters. Note that the additional spi- rals (secondary, tertiary, and so on) are always located ahead of the primary spiral. In Figure 4c,d we also show the azimuthal distribution of angular momentum flux, fJ (r, φ) = r2Σ(r)δur(r, φ)δuφ(r, φ), (20) at different radii. This quantity is related to the angular momentum flux according to (cid:73) FJ (r) = fJ (r, φ)dφ. (21) The evolution of the azimuthal profile of fJ with r al- lows us to trace the exchange of angular momentum flux between the multiple arms as the wake propagates away from the planet. The AMF is peaked near the locations of both the −0.50.00.5(φ−φp)/π0.10.31.03.0r/rp(a)FiducialPrimaryPrimarySecondaryTertiary−0.50.00.5(φ−φp)/π(b)hp=0.05−0.50.00.5(φ−φp)/π(c)q=1/2−0.50.00.5(φ−φp)/π(d)p=0−2.0−1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0(Mp/Mth)−1δΣ/Σ6 Fig. 3. -- The two-dimensional fractional surface density perturbation for the fiducial paramaters and several cases with varied parameters, as in Figure 2, but shown here in Cartesian coordinates, and focusing only on the spiral structure in the inner disk, interior to the orbit of the planet. The positions of the primary, secondary, and tertiary arms are indicated in the top-left panel. peaks (δΣ > 0) and the troughs (δΣ < 0) of the sur- face density perturbation, since the angular momentum flux is approximately proportional to the square of δΣ far from the planet (Rafikov 2002a), rc3 s (δΣ)2. fJ ≈ (22) In particular, in the outer disk, for r/rp (cid:38) a few, the trough trailing the primary arm of the surface density perturbation carries a significant fraction of the AMF. Ω − ΩpΣ We provide more in depth discussion of the different features of the density wake in §3.5. 3.3. Dependence on Adiabatic Index In the calculations presented in this section, we have adopted γ = 7/5 as the fiducial adiabatic index. We have also carried out calculations for hp = 0.1, q = 1, and p = 1 with different values of γ, the results of which are shown in Figure 5. Here azimuthal profiles of δΣ are shown at different radii for several values of γ in addi- tion to γ = 7/5. The case γ = 1.001 corresponds to an almost (locally) isothermal disk. The case γ = 4/3 repre- sents the effective two-dimensional adiabatic index corre- sponding to a three-dimensional adiabatic index Γ = 7/5. These different adiabatic indices are related according to γ = (3Γ − 1)/(Γ + 1) (Goldreich et al. 1986; Ostriker et al. 1992) in the low-frequency limit, ω (cid:28) Ω (valid for r ≈ rp). For γ = 2, the disk has a uniform entropy profile (see equation 7) and we recover the barotropic limit. The surface density profiles shown in Figure 5 demon- strate that our results are remarkably insensitive to the value of γ7. Mathematically, this is because γ-dependent contributions appear in equation (6) only through terms varying on scales of ∼ rp. In §5, we show that the forma- tion of multiple spirals is well-described by considering 7 The perturbation structure in the immediate vicinity of rp (within about 0.1H) has a strong dependence on γ, but this is not important for our present study of spiral arms far from the planet. −0.50.00.5y/rp(a)FiducialPrimarySecondaryTertiary(b)hp=0.05−0.50.00.5x/rp−0.50.00.5y/rp(c)q=1/2−0.50.00.5x/rp(d)p=0−1.0−0.50.00.51.0(Mp/Mth)−1δΣ/Σ7 Fig. 4. -- Top panels: profiles of the surface density perturbation δΣ, scaled by δΣlin (see equation 16) to facilitate comparison between the profiles at different radii. Bottom panels: profiles of the azimuthal distribution of angular momentum flux fJ , in terms of the characteristic angular momentum flux FJ,0 (equation 19). Profiles are shown for several different radii in the outer disk (left panels) and the inner disk (right panels), for the fiducial disk parameters. the phases of different modes in the local (WKB) limit, in which the globally-varying terms in equation (6) with explicit dependence on γ are unimportant. Therefore, it is sufficient to only consider the fiducial γ = 7/5 in our subsequent discussion. 3.4. Numerical Validation To validate and understand the limitations of our semi- analytical linear calculations, we have also carried out a set of direct numerical simulations of planet-disk inter- action in the low mass regime using fargo3d (Ben´ıtez- Llambay & Masset 2016). These simulations will be dis- cussed in detail in a future work. Here we describe only the basic setup as well as the results for the fiducial disk parameters, hp = 0.1, q = 1, and p = 1. We choose a planet mass Mp = 10−5M∗, or 0.01Mth. Since Mp (cid:28) Mth, the linear regime is appropriate for describing the disk response, except far ((cid:38) 6Hp) from the planet, where nonlinear effects (fully captured in simulations) -- wake evolution into a shock and subse- quent dissipation -- become non-negligible (Goodman & Rafikov 2001). A softening length of 0.6Hp is applied to the potential of the planet. We use a logarithmically- spaced radial grid extending from rin = 0.05rp to rout = 5.0rp with Nr = 4505 grid cells, and a uniformly-spaced azimuthal grid with Nφ = 6144 grid cells. The resulting grid cells have a roughly square shape with a resolution of 98 cells per scale height. Wave damping zones (e.g., de Val-Borro et al. 2006) are implemented for r < 0.06rp and r > 4.5rp in order to minimize wave reflection at the boundaries (note that direct comparison with the results of our linear calculations is not possible in the damping zones). We adopt an ideal equation of state with γ = 1.001. This value of γ close to unity is chosen in order to avoid any significant heating of the disk due to wave dissipation during our simulations. Note that although this setup re- sembles that of a locally isothermal disk, the two cases are physically distinct. In locally isothermal disks, non- axisymmetric perturbations are known to exchange an- gular momentum with the background flow (Lin & Pa- paloizou 2011; Lin 2015), which can lead to anomalous results.8 No explicit viscosity is included in the simula- tion. We compare the results of the numerical simulation after 10 orbits (when steady state is reached) with our linear calculations (using γ = 1.001 in order to facilitate direct comparison) in Figure 6. The profiles of the sur- face density perturbation δΣ are shown at several differ- ent disk radii in the inner disk, highlighting the multiple spiral arm structure. The profiles are rotated by φlin(r) and scaled by δΣlin(r), as in Figure 4. The numerical results exhibit very good agreement with the linear prediction. The positions of the primary, secondary, and tertiary arms are closely reproduced, dif- fering by (cid:46) 0.05 radians from the linear prediction even at the smallest radii. In particular, the initial secondary- 8 We look into this issue in more detail in Miranda & Rafikov (in prep.). −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.02.5δΣ/δΣlinOuterDisk(a)r=1.10rpr=1.50rpr=3.00rpr=5.00rp−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.02.5InnerDisk(b)r=0.90rpr=0.50rpr=0.25rpr=0.10rp−1.0−0.50.00.51.0[φ−φlin(r)]/π−1.00.01.02.03.04.05.06.0fJ/FJ,0(c)−1.0−0.50.00.51.0[φ−φlin(r)]/π−0.20.00.20.40.60.81.01.2(d)8 Fig. 5. -- Surface density perturbation profiles in the inner disk for the fiducial disk parameters, hp = 0.1, q = p = 1, and different values of the adiabatic index γ. to-primary arm separation is ≈ 60◦, and this separation decreases towards smaller radii, in agreement with our calculations (see §3.5). This is a unique feature of the secondary spiral in the linear regime, which should be contrasted with the 180◦ separation which arises when Mp > Mth (e.g., Zhu et al. 2015). The amplitudes of the arms and troughs in the numerical simulation also show good agreement with the linear prediction, exhibiting es- sentially negligible differences, except for at small radii (r (cid:46) 0.1rp), where differences of ≈ 20% arise due to non- linear effects (especially in the amplitude of the trough between the primary and secondary spirals). Notably, the amplitude of the secondary arm overtaking that of the primary for r (cid:46) 0.1rp is well reproduced in the simu- lation. The agreement between the numerical simulation and linear theory supports full applicability of our results to low-mass planets. We note that no shocks are present in Figure 6, in contradiction with the results of Rafikov (2002a), which predict shock formation at about 0.3rp. However, the calculations of Rafikov (2002a) were carried out for the case of a single spiral arm propagating in a self-similar fashion. In our calculations, there is an exchange of an- gular momentum flux from the primary spiral arm to the secondary spiral arm, which modifies this picture. Evi- dently this exchange lowers the amplitude of the primary Fig. 6. -- Profiles of the surface density perturbation at several radii in the inner disk, comparing the results of our numerical simulation (solid curves) and the results of our linear calculation (dashed curves) for the fiducial parameters (with γ = 1.001). arm and suppresses shock formation for the planet mass (Mp = 0.01Mth) that we have considered here. 3.5. Structure of the Multiple Spirals We now characterize the morphological properties -- amplitude, width, and arm-to-arm separation -- of the spiral arms, the radial dependence of these properties, and how they vary with the disk parameters. We first briefly describe the procedure for identifying and char- acterizing the spiral arms, the results of which are illus- trated in Figures 7 -- 8. We emphasize that the procedure for decomposing δΣ into discrete spiral arms and troughs is heuristic and not unique; in practice this decomposi- tion can be done using different criteria than the ones we used. Therefore the results should be taken as semi- quantitative descriptions. 3.5.1. Identification and Characterization of Spiral Arms At r = rp, δΣ has a single (global) maximum, located at ≈ φp, which we identify as the primary arm. By following the position of this maximum across different radii, we obtain the position of the primary arm as a function of r. If at some r, a second (local) maximum with an amplitude equal to at least 10% of the ampli- tude of the primary arm is present, it is identified as the secondary spiral arm. This relative amplitude threshold is necessary in order to avoid spurious "detections" of additional spirals. The position of the secondary is then 0.00.51.0(a)r=0.80rpγ=1.001γ=4/3γ=7/5γ=2−0.50.00.51.0(b)r=0.40rp−0.50.00.5δΣ/δΣlin(c)r=0.20rp−0.50.00.5(d)r=0.10rp−1.0−0.50.00.51.0[φ−φlin(r)]/π−0.50.00.5(e)r=0.05rp0.00.51.0(a)r=0.80rpTheorySimulationTheorySimulation−0.50.00.51.0(b)r=0.40rp−0.50.00.5δΣ/δΣlin(c)r=0.20rp−0.50.00.5(d)r=0.10rp−1.0−0.50.00.51.0[φ−φlin(r)]/π−0.50.00.5(e)r=0.06rp9 Fig. 7. -- Properties of the multiple spiral arms (solid curves) and their associated troughs (dashed curves) as functions of radius, for different values of the disk aspect ratio near the planet, hp (left, right, and middle panels), and with fixed values of the temperature and surface density power law indices q = 1 and p = 1. Top panels: Positions of the arms and troughs relative to the primary arm. Top middle panels: The full-width half maxima of the arms and troughs. Bottom middle panels: The absolute values of the surface density perturbations associated with the arms and troughs, scaled by δΣlin (equation 16). Bottom panels: The angular momentum flux FJ associated with each arm or trough, as well as the sum of the angular momentum flux of each arm and its associated trough (dotted curves), and the total angular momentum flux (sum over all of the arms and troughs; dot-dashed curves). followed across different radii in the same manner as the primary. The emergence of subsequent (e.g., tertiary, quaternary) arms is determined by a similar criterion, except we require the amplitude to be at least 10% of the strongest spiral arm at a given r, which may not nec- essarily be the primary (since it amplitude decays with distance from the planet). The positions of the spiral arms are denoted φP, φS, and so on. We also identify the troughs, i.e., local minima of δΣ. We associate each trough with a spiral arm at each r, since features tend to appear in arm/trough pairs (see Figure 4). The troughs are therefore designated as the "primary trough", "secondary trough", and so on. Note that near the planet, the primary arm is accompanied by two troughs, one leading and one trailing. Toward the outer disk, the trailing trough becomes the stronger of the two, and so it is identified as the primary trough. In the inner disk, the leading trough becomes stronger, and so it is identified as the primary trough instead. This is the origin of the discontinuity in the position of the primary trough in Figs. 7a -- c and 8a -- b. Multiple arms formed in the inner disk are each similarly accompanied by a leading trough. In the outer disk, when multiple arms are present (we find at most two, and only for our thinnest disk), they are instead accompanied by trailing troughs. Using the profiles of δΣ in the vicinity of the peaks and troughs, we quantify the amplitudes and widths of the arms/troughs using the maximum and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of δΣ for arms, and of −δΣ for troughs. The arm amplitudes are denoted by δΣP, δΣS, etc. Note that since troughs are simply identified as local minima, it is sometimes the case (for high order troughs, e.g., tertiary and beyond) that δΣ > 0 at the trough location. In this case the width of the trough is unde- fined, since the amplitude is measured relative to zero. But as the trough evolves, eventually δΣ at the mini- mum becomes negative, so the trough has a well-defined (but narrow) width. The trough width increases as its amplitude grows, until it resembles the initial widths of lower-order troughs, and then becomes more narrow to- wards the inner disk, in accordance with the behavior of the other arms/troughs. This explains the anomalous behavior of some of the high-order trough widths seen in, e.g., Figure 7f and 8c -- d. We also keep track the AMF FJ carried by each arm or trough by integrating the AMF distribution (equa- tion 20) over its azimuthal extent, which is delineated by the zeros of δΣ. These roughly correspond to the zeros of fJ , since the latter is approximately proportional to (δΣ)2 (see Fig. 4 and equation 22). Note that the AMF 090180270360φ−φP[◦](a)hp=0.05020406080FWHM[◦](d)0.01.02.03.0δΣ/δΣlin(g)0.10.30.51.03.0r/rp0.00.20.40.60.8FJ/FJ,0(j)(b)hp=0.1(e)(h)0.10.30.51.03.0r/rp(k)(c)hp=0.15Primary(Arm)Primary(Trough)SecondaryTertiaryQuaternary(f)(i)0.10.30.51.03.0r/rp(l)Arm+TroughTotal10 Fig. 8. -- The same as Figure 7, but for different values of the temperature power law index q, with hp = 0.1. Fig. 9. -- The radii at which the amplitude of the surface density perturbation associated with the secondary spiral arm, δΣS, relative to the amplitude of the primary arm, δΣP, is equal to 0.2 (red points), 0.5 (blue points), and 1 (green points). In each panel, two of three disk parameters (aspect ratio hp, temperature power law index q, and surface density power law index p) are fixed at their fiducial values, while the value of the third parameter is varied. The dashed curves indicate the theoretical predictions given by equations (38) -- (39), calibrated to the fiducial disk parameters (i.e., using hp = 0.1). is divided up and assigned to the arms and troughs in a conservative manner, so that the sum of the AMF asso- ciated with all of the peaks and troughs at a given radius is equal to FJ (r). The extracted properties of the arms and troughs (po- sition, width, amplitude, and AMF) are shown for the fiducial case and for cases with different disk aspect ra- tios in Figure 7, and for cases with different temper- ature power law indices in Figure 8. Note that the arm/trough positions are shown relative to the position of the primary arm, φP, which is well-approximated by equation (15) (although it may differ by ∼ 10◦ far from the planet, see Fig. 4). Also note that the amplitudes are scaled by δΣlin, in order to remove the simple variation of amplitude with r resulting from angular momentum flux conservation. The AMF (lower panels) is scaled by the characteristic AMF due to the one-sided Lindblad torques given by Equation (19). 3.5.2. Outer Disk The structure of the surface density perturbation (see Figs. 7g -- i and 8e -- f) in the outer disk is fairly sim- ple. Typically the perturbation consists only of a pri- mary arm, with a width of about 10◦, and its associ- 090180270360φ−φP[◦](a)q=0020406080FWHM[◦](c)0.00.51.01.52.0δΣ/δΣlin(e)0.10.30.51.03.0r/rp0.00.20.40.6FJ/FJ,0(g)(b)q=1/2Primary(Arm)Primary(Trough)SecondaryTertiaryQuaternaryQuinary(d)(f)0.10.30.51.03.0r/rp(h)Arm+TroughTotal0.00.20.40.60.050.100.15r/rphp(a)q=1,p=1δΣS/δΣP=0.2δΣS/δΣP=0.5δΣS/δΣP=10.00.51.0q(b)hp=0.1,p=10.00.51.01.5p(c)hp=0.1,q=1TheoryNumerical11 Fig. 10. -- Two-dimensional fractional surface density perturbations for the propagation of passive spiral wake with an initially specified profile at rout (see §4). The leftmost panel shows the case of the fiducial disk parameters hout = 0.1, q = 1, and p = 1, and σ = 0.06. In the other panels, the disk aspect ratio, temperature power law index, and initial width are varied. In all cases, the single spiral arm imposed at rout splits up into two or more arms as it propagates inwards. ated trough, which is about four times wider. Their amplitudes vary slowly, with the gradual decay of the arm amplitude accompanied by the gradual growth of the trough amplitude. The amplitude of the trough re- mains small relative to the arm (a few tenths at most), although it carries a significant fraction of the AMF (see Figs. 7j -- l and 8g -- h) due to its large width. For hp = 0.1 and smaller (with q = 1), the trough carries most of the AMF (i.e., more than the peak) for r (cid:38) (1.5 − 2.0)rp. For the thinnest disk we have considered (hp = 0.05), a secondary arm does form at about 3rp (see Fig. 7g), which is explained in §5.2.2. Its amplitude grows very slowly with r, and is only about 12% of that of the pri- mary at 5rp. Note that we have solved for the structure of the perturbations only out to 5rp, and so it is pos- sible that a secondary arm emerges beyond this radius for larger hp as well (although our analytic estimates in- dicate that this is unlikely, see §5.2.2). If so, it forms very far from the planet in comparison to the inner disk, where a secondary arm always forms at about half of the orbital radius of the planet. And as demonstrated by the hp = 0.05 case, the outer secondary spiral is very weak even when it exists. Therefore we do not devote much attention to secondary spirals in the outer disk. 3.5.3. Inner Disk In the inner disk, multiple (three to five) spiral arms are robustly formed for a variety of parameters. For the fiducial parameters (Figure 7b,e,h,k), the secondary arm first appears at 0.46rp, with an initial separation of about 70◦ from the primary arm, and an initial width of 45◦. At smaller radii, its separation relative to the primary arm decreases to about 30◦, and its width decreases to about 20◦. The amplitude of the secondary arm increases as that of the primary decreases. At r = 0.17rp, the amplitude of the secondary is about half of the primary, and at r = 0.06rp, the secondary amplitude exceeds the primary amplitude. A weak tertiary arm forms at about 0.3rp, and a weak quaternary arm forms at about 0.1rp. The tertiary and quaternary arms each form at ≈ 135◦ from the previ- ous arm (roughly twice the secondary-to-primary sepa- ration), with an initial width of about 60◦, see Figure 7b,e. After the quaternary arm forms, roughly the entire 2π extent of the disk is populated with spirals, and so it is unlikely that any more well-defined arms would form9. Nonetheless, we emphasize that the tertiary and higher- order arms have very small amplitudes relative to the primary and secondary even at r = 0.05rp (see Figure 7h), and thus are relatively unimportant features. As in the outer disk, the primary trough carries a sig- nificant portion of the total AMF (see Figs. 7j -- l and 8g -- h), and typically carries more AMF than the primary arm at r (cid:46) (0.5−0.8)rp, which is a larger radius than the 9 Although since the arms become more narrow toward the in- ner disk, there may possibly be room for additional arms at even smaller radii. −0.50.00.5φ/π0.10.30.51.0r/rout(a)Fiducial−0.50.00.5φ/π(b)hout=0.05−0.50.00.5φ/π(c)q=1/2−0.50.00.5φ/π(d)σ=0.18−1.0−0.50.00.51.0δΣ/Σ12 panel, two of the three disk parameters (hp, q, and p) are held fixed while the third one is varied. These properties depend most strongly on hp, with the arm forming closer to planet for smaller hp. For values of q smaller than the fiducial q = 1, i.e., for more flared disks, the secondary arm forms somewhat closer to the planet. However, its amplitude grows with radius faster than the case with q = 1, reaching 50% and 100% of the primary amplitude at significantly larger radii. The development of the secondary spiral is relatively insensitive to the slope of the surface density profile, for a plausible range of values (0 < p < 3/2). This is evident in the structure of the 2D surface density maps in Fig- ures 2 -- 3, which show the cases p = 1 and p = 0 (note that the overall scaling of the amplitude of the perturbations with r differs between the two cases, but this is triv- ially described by AMF conservation, see equation 16). This is shown quantitatively in Figure 9c. The radius at which the secondary spiral forms differs by only about 5% between the cases p = 0 and p = 3/2. Fig. 11. -- Profiles of the surface density perturbation (top panel) and azimuthal distribution of angular momentum flux (bottom panel) at different radii, as in Figure 4, but for the homogeneous problem of a passive spiral wake. one at which the secondary arm forms, or at which the secondary arm amplitude becomes stronger than the pri- mary (in terms of amplitude). The AMF of the secondary arm exceeds primary arm AMF for r (cid:46) (0.4 − 0.5)rp. Far inside inner disk (r ≈ 0.1rp), the AMF is primarily carried by secondary arm, secondary trough, and pri- mary trough, while contributions from the other peaks and troughs are negligible. 3.6. Dependence on Disk Parameters Figure 2a,c shows that lowering hp results in more tightly wound spiral arms. For such colder and thinner disks, the secondary arm (in the inner disk) forms closer to the primary (in azimuthal angle), with a smaller ini- tial width and smaller initial arm-to-arm separation, and it becomes stronger than the primary also at a larger ra- dius, see Figure 7a,d,g,j. For temperature profiles with q different from unity, Figure 2a,b shows that the pitch angle of the spirals vary with radius. For q < 1, the initial properties of the secondary arm are relatively unchanged, but its am- plitude becomes larger than the primary amplitude at larger radii (similar to the case of lower hp), see Fig- ure 8. Additional (tertiary and beyond) arms also form closer to the planet for thinner disks, and more arms are formed -- as many as five for hp = 0.05 (however, the full azimuthal extent of the inner disk is not fully populated with spirals in this case, as it is for larger aspect ratios). The development of the secondary arm in the inner disk is summarized in Figure 9 for different disk parame- ters. It shows the radial location at which the amplitude of the secondary arm, δΣS, relative to the amplitude of the primary, δΣP, is equal to 0.2, 0.5, and 1. In each 4. RESULTS FOR PASSIVELY PROPAGATING SPIRAL WAVES As will be shown in §5, the formation of the secondary spiral can be described fairly well by the local (WKB) approximation, which is valid far from resonances, where multiple spiral arms emerge, and where the gravitational influence of the planet is negligible. This indicates that the external potential of the planet plays a minimal role in this process. Therefore, motivated by the results of Arzamasskiy & Rafikov (2018), we may expect that any spiral wake formed by the phase coherence of a series of modes launched in a companion-free disk will also break up into multiple spirals. To this end, we investigate the passive linear propaga- tion of a spiral wake (not subject to the external potential of a planet). More specifically, we perform a calculation representing a linear analogue of the nonlinear calcula- tion of Arzamasskiy & Rafikov (2018), closely following their setup. In this setup, a surface density perturbation δΣ(φ) rotating with a pattern frequency ωp is imposed at a radius rout, and is allowed to propagate towards the disk center (only inward propagation is allowed provided that ωp < Ωout). We solve for the structure of the modes of the homo- geneous wave equation (6) with Φm = 0 by shooting so- lutions inward from rout in order to satisfy the outgoing wave boundary condition at rin = 0.05rout. For simplic- ity, here we choose a mode pattern frequency ωp = 0 (so that the wave pattern is fixed in the inertial frame), which corresponds to waves launched at a radius (cid:29) rout. Once the mode profiles are obtained, any azimuthal pro- file δΣ can be constructed from an appropriate linear combination of the different δΣm's. The perturbation imposed at rout is chosen to be a −0.50.00.51.0δΣ/δΣlin(a)r/rout=1.00r/rout=0.50r/rout=0.25r/rout=0.10−1.0−0.50.00.51.0[φ−φlin(r)]/π0.02.04.06.08.010.0fJ/FJ,out(b)13 Fig. 12. -- The radii at which the amplitude of the secondary arm reaches 0.2 (red points), 0.5 (blue points), and 1 (green points) relative to that of the primary arm, as in Figure 9, but for the homogeneous problem. In the different panels, the aspect ratio, temperature power law index, and initial perturbation width are varied while the other parameter values are held fixed. Note that "missing" points indicate that the secondary amplitude did not reach the specified threshold anywhere for r > rin = 0.05 for the specified parameter value. The dashed curves show the theoretical predictions given by equations (38) and (44), calibrated to the fiducial parameters. Gaussian10, (cid:34) δΣ(rout) ∝ exp − (cid:19)2(cid:35) . (cid:18) φ σ 1 2 (23) Thus, there are four parameters in our setup. These are the three disk parameters hout and q which define the sound speed profile, now parameterized by cs(r) = houtroutΩout(r/rout)−q/2, and the surface density power law index p, as well as the initial azimuthal width σ of the surface density perturbation. For the fiducial param- eters, we choose hout = 0.1, q = 1, p = 1, and σ = 0.06. The fiducial σ is chosen to produce a surface density profile similar to the one produced near the planet for the case of the fiducial parameters in the inhomogeneous problem. Figure 10 shows 2D maps of the fractional surface den- sity perturbation, for the fiducial parameters, and for several cases with varied parameters. In all of these cases, the initial, single peaked perturbation profile breaks up into multiple arms, in agreement with findings of Arza- masskiy & Rafikov (2018). The azimuthal profiles of δΣ at different radii are shown in Figure 11 for the fiducial parameters. They are qualitatively very similar to the profiles that develop in the inner disk in the case of the spiral wake driven by a planet, see Figure 4. The az- imuthal distribution of the angular momentum flux sim- ilarly becomes divided up into several different peaks. We emphasize that the appearance of multiple spirals in this setup, in which there are no resonances in the disk, indicates that the formation of multiple spirals is not connected to resonances. Figure 12 summarizes the dependence of secondary arm amplitude on disk parameters and the initial width 10 The actual profile imposed at rout differs slightly from the form specified by equation (23). Specifically, the actual profile is "missing" the m = 1 Fourier component. This is because the m = 1 mode is evanescent interior to its OLR (which is assumed to be located at r (cid:29) rout), and exterior to its ILR (which is formally located at r = 0). Therefore, the amplitude of the m = 1 mode is assumed to be zero at rout, as a result of its evanescent propagation from large r. Note that if we had instead chosen the amplitude of the m = 1 mode to be finite at rout (so that δΣ is given exactly by eq. 23), it would decay away towards small r anyway, and it would not strongly affect our results. of the spiral wake. The dependence on the surface den- sity profile index p is extremely weak. In fact, it is much weaker than in the case with a planet: the radius at which the secondary spiral emerges changes by less than 1% when the value of p is varied between 0 and 1. This lack of sensitivity to Σ profile is explained in §5. On the other hand, properties of the secondary spiral depend strongly on the initial width of the perturbation, see Figure 12c. Wider initial perturbations lead to the development of the secondary spiral at larger radii, which is discussed in §5. In this experiment, we have isolated the effect of the initial perturbation width, as it is con- trolled by the parameter σ, which is unrelated to the disk parameters. In the case of a density wave launched by a planet, the width of the spiral wake near the planet is set by the disk aspect ratio, since the perturbation is dominated by modes with m ∼ 1/hp, and so thinner disks produce narrower initial wakes. In the homoge- neous case, by separating these two effects, we see that variation of the disk aspect ratio has an even stronger effect on the emergence of the secondary spiral than it does in the case with a planet: changing hout by a fac- tor of three changes the radius at which the secondary emerges by a factor of two. Evidently these two effects somewhat cancel out in the case with a planet. 5. ANALYTICAL UNDERSTANDING OF OUR RESULTS In this section, we present theoretical arguments, fol- lowing those made by Ogilvie & Lubow (2002) and Bae & Zhu (2018a), which interpret spiral arm formation as resulting from constructive interference among different azimuthal modes. We then use these arguments to ex- plain and interpret the results of our numerical calcula- tions. 5.1. Mode Phases and Interference The surface density perturbation of the mode with az- imuthal number m is δΣm(r, φ) = δΣm(r) exp[iψm(r)], where ψm(r) = Arg[δΣm(r)] + m(φ − φp). (24) (25) 0.00.20.40.60.050.100.15r/routhout(a)q=1,σ=0.060.00.51.0q(b)hout=0.1,σ=0.06δΣS/δΣP=0.2δΣS/δΣP=0.5δΣS/δΣP=10.050.100.150.20σ(c)hout=0.1,q=1TheoryNumerical14 The phase of δΣm can be expressed as (Ogilvie & Lubow 2002) Arg[δΣm(r)] = sgn(r − rp) where r± = (cid:90) r (cid:19)2/3 + r± π 4 (cid:18) 1 m 1 ± (cid:48) (cid:48) , )dr km(r (26) rp (27) is the location11 of the outer (+)/inner (−) Lindblad resonance, and the π/4 term is the phase shift associated with the resonance. The radial number is given in the local (WKB) limit (and in the Keplerian limit κ = Ω) by (cid:2)m2(Ω − Ωp)2 − Ω2(cid:3)1/2 km(r) = 1 cs Note that for m (cid:29) 1, km(r) ≈ km(r), where km(r) = m cs Ω − Ωp, which is simply proportional to m. Defining we can write ∆km(r) = km(r) − km(r), (cid:90) r± (cid:90) r + m(φ − φP) (cid:48) km(r ψm = sgn(r − rp) (cid:48) ∆km(r )dr π 4 + − rp r± . (28) (29) (30) (cid:48) (cid:48) . )dr (31) Here we have defined12 φP = φp − = φp − (cid:90) r (cid:90) r rp rp (cid:48) (cid:48) )dr km(r Ω(r(cid:48)) − Ωp cs(r(cid:48)) (cid:48) . dr (32) Note the distinction between φp (with a lowercase sub- script), the position of the planet, and φP (with an upper- case subscript), the position of the primary spiral arm. Also, in equations (26), (31), (32) note the different lim- its of integration. The perturbation δΣm has a maximum found by set- ting ψm = 0. For modes with m (cid:29) 1, the last two terms in equation (31) become negligible, so that the maxima of these modes have positions φ ≈ φP. For general m, the maximum of δΣm interferes constructively with these modes if (cid:90) r ∆km(r (cid:48) (cid:48) )dr − r± (cid:48) km(r ) < ∆φ0, (33) where ∆φ0 is the maximum phase difference which re- sults in constructive interference. In general, this crite- rion is indeed satisfied (for some range of r and values of m), resulting in the formation of the primary spiral arm. Therefore, φP gives the approximate position of the pri- mary spiral (Ogilvie & Lubow 2002; Rafikov 2002a). To 11 Note that this expression neglects O(h2 p) terms due to radial pressure support and non-zero Nr. 12 Note that φP is equivalent to φlin as defined in equation (15). Here it has been redefined to emphasize that it gives a theoretical prediction for the azimuthal position of the primary spiral arm. (cid:90) r± rp understand the origin of higher-order arms (secondary, tertiary, etc.), let us note that maxima of δΣm are also attained at ψm = 2πn, where n = 1, 2, . . . , m − 2, m − 1 is an integer. Maxima in this range of n are distinct in a sense that, at a given r, each of them corresponds to a well defined azimuthal location φ = φm,n (in a frame co-rotating with the planet), where φm,n(r) = φp + 1 m [−Arg(δΣm(r)) + 2πn] . (34) Values of n outside the interval [1, m − 1] yield φm,n coinciding with one of the azimuthal locations inside this interval. As pointed out by Bae & Zhu (2018a), these locations may define additional curves along which constructive interference occurs. In their formulation, a spiral arm may be formed as a result of constructive interference among the φm,n peaks with different values of m (but a fixed value of n). The primary spiral is a result of constructive interference of peaks with n = 0. In the inner disk, the secondary spiral is a result of interference of peaks with n = 1, the tertiary spiral is associated with n = 2, and so on. In the outer disk, n = m − 1 peaks are associated with the formation of a secondary spiral, n = m − 2 with a tertiary spiral, and so on. The argument of Bae & Zhu (2018a) is based on the WKB approximation for the phases of the modes, and no account is given to the behavior of the mode amplitudes. In our calculations, the mode phases (as well as ampli- tudes) are computed exactly, by solving for the global mode structure (i.e., not using WKB approximation). To illustrate how the mode interference idea works in our fully self-consistent calculation, in Figure 13 we show the phases of different crests of the modes defined by equa- tion (34), which were numerically computed using our full linear solutions. In agreement with Ogilvie & Lubow (2002), this figure indicates that the mode phases with n = 0 are tightly clustered in phase, and these phases closely follow that of the primary arm. But in addition to that, one also sees that the phases with n = 1, which are initially very spread out (over a range of ∼ π), be- come more clustered towards the inner disk. The phases of these modes follow the phase of the secondary spi- ral arm, indicating that the constructive interference of n = 1 mode crests is indeed responsible for the emergence of the secondary arm. The n = 2 phases also start out very spread out in azimuth at r = rp. They slowly converge as r de- creases, although they still span a range of ∼ π/2 even at r = 0.05rp. These phases are approximately coincident with that of the tertiary arm, although this correspon- dence is not as tight as it is for the cases of the primary and secondary arms. This highlights the fact that the phase information of the modes, while suggestive of the structure of the spiral arms, is not sufficient to fully cap- ture their structure. Rather, a full consideration of the mode phases and amplitudes is required, which is done in this work. None of the phases behind the n = 0 phases (i.e. n = m − 1, n = m − 2) are as tightly clustered as those with n = 0. Correspondingly, no spiral arm forms behind the primary in the inner disk (for the fiducial parameters). 15 Fig. 13. -- The phases of different surface density peaks associated with modes with different azimuthal numbers. Each φm,n corresponds to the nth peak associated with the mode of azimuthal number m. Constructive interference between peaks with different values of m but the same value of n may be responsible for the formation of the multiple spiral arms. The different colored curves correspond to different azimuthal numbers, and the different panels correspond to different values of n. In the three leftmost panels, the phases of the n = 0, n = 1, and n = 2 peaks, which are associated the primary, secondary, and tertiary arms (respectively), are shown, along with symbols (diamonds) indicating the actual location of these arms. In the two rightmost panels, phases of peaks with n = m − 1 and n = m − 2 are shown. These peaks are not relevant to secondary spiral arm formation in the inner disk, as they are located behind, rather than in front of, the primary arm. 5.2. Analytic Estimates primary arm are then given approximately by We now try to predict the radius at which secondary arm emerges, as well as its location and width, using a phase interference argument. We do this by estimating the spread in the relevant φm,n's, and identifying the regions in which they are appropriately clustered as the locations of the different spiral arms. In order to do this, we make use of the WKB approximation, which we find to reproduce the mode phases (φm,n's) found in our numerical calculations with reasonable accuracy. For modes with m close to m∗ ≈ (2hp)−1, the error in the WKB phases is ∼ 20% in the vicinity of the Lindblad resonances, and an order of magnitude smaller far from the resonances, where secondary spiral arm formation occurs. From (26) and (34), we have φm,n = φp− sgn(r− rp) π 4m + 2πn m − km(r(cid:48)) (cid:48) dr (35) r± m (cid:90) r (cf. Bae & Zhu 2018a). The planet-induced density wake is dominated by modes with m ≈ m∗. Therefore, defin- ing φn ≡ φm∗,n, we follow the ansatz of Bae & Zhu (2018a), and identify in the inner disk the position of the secondary spiral as φS = φ1, the position of the ter- tiary spiral as φT = φ2, and so on. The positions of the secondary and higher-order spiral arms relative to the φn − φP = −sign(r − rp) ∆km∗ (r(cid:48)) (cid:90) r − r± m∗ + 2πn m∗ (cid:90) r± π 4m∗ (cid:48) dr + rp m∗ km∗ (r(cid:48)) (36) (cid:48) , dr see equations (32) and (35). However, in order for a spiral arm to exist at φ = φn, the appropriate φm,n's must be sufficiently clustered. The spread in φm,n for values of m in the vicinity of m∗ is (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:18) ∂φm,n (cid:19) ∂m m∗ (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ∆m, δφm,n = (37) where ∆m represents the range of azimuthal numbers which contribute to the arm. We assume that this range is comparable to the critical m itself, taking ∆m = ζm∗, with ζ ∼ 1.13 In order for the the φm,n's to construc- tively interfere and form a spiral arm, we require that δφm,n < ∆φ0/m∗ (where, as in equation 33, ∆φ0 is a critical separation required for constructive interference, 13 This is a reasonable assumption for the narrow primary and secondary spirals. However, the broader widths of the tertiary and higher order spiral arms may indicate that they are dominated by modes with a smaller range of m, indicating that ζ < 1 may be appropriate for these spirals. −0.50.00.5(φm,0−φp)/π0.10.31.03.0r/rp(a)P−0.50.00.5(φm,1−φp)/π(b)S−0.50.00.5(φm,2−φp)/π(c)T−0.50.00.5(φm,m−1−φp)/π(d)−0.50.00.5(φm,m−2−φp)/π(e)251015202530m16 so that the variation of ψm is less than ∆φ0). Evaluating the derivative in equation (37) and simplifying, we find the condition for spiral arm formation −1m∗δφm,n < ∆ φ0, δφn ≡ ζ (38) where ∆ φ0 = ∆φ0ζ−1 is a new "phase spread" constant and14 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)2πn − sign(r − rp) (cid:90) r r± π 4 + Ω2(r(cid:48))dr(cid:48) s (r(cid:48))km∗ (r(cid:48)) c2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) . δφn = (39) Note that δφn represents the spread in mode phases, while δφn/m∗ gives the approximate spiral arm width (provided that a spiral arm exists). The integral in equa- tion (39) is positive (negative) in the outer (inner) disk. Therefore, a necessary condition for δφn to become small enough to form a spiral arm is that n ≤ 0 (n ≥ 0) in the outer (inner) disk. Hence, secondary and higher order spirals can only be attributed to constructive interference of φm,n with n > 0 in the inner disk, and only to φm,n with n < 0 (or equivalently, n = m − 1, m − 2, etc.) in the outer disk, should spiral arms be present there (Bae & Zhu 2018a). Note that equation (39) can be used to estimate the phase spread of the primary spiral arm by taking n = 0. From this we see that the formation of the secondary spiral is coincident with the dissolution of the primary spiral, since δφ0 necessarily becomes large as δφ1 becomes small. This explains a trend seen in Figs. 7g -- i and 8e -- f: the decrease in δΣP toward the inner disk is accompanied by an increase in δΣS. Up to this point, we have left the value of ∆ φ0 arbi- trary. Roughly speaking, we expect that taking ∆ φ0 ≈ π in equation (38) should qualitatively predict the presence of a spiral arm (Ogilvie & Lubow 2002). In practice, we can use our full numerical results to calibrate this crite- rion. We compute values of ∆ φ0 corresponding to dif- ferent relative strengths of the secondary (and tertiary) spiral arm. We do this by calculating using equation (39), for example, δφ1(rS20), where rS20 denotes location at which δΣS/δΣP = 20%, inferred from our numerical results. These values are given in Table 1. 5.2.1. Passive Spirals The same formalism can also be applied to our nu- merical experiments for a passively propagating spirals presented in §4. In this setup, we assume that all modes are exactly in phase at rout. We also assume that the (inner) Lindblad resonances for all modes are located ex- terior to rout. Therefore, in equation (26), we drop the π/4 term (associated with the resonance), and take rout as the lower limit of the km integral. Therefore, we have φm,n = 2πn m − km(r(cid:48)) rout m (cid:48) . dr (40) (cid:90) r In the expression for the radial wavenumber (28), the or- bital frequency of the planet Ωp should be replaced by the specified pattern frequency ωp. Additionally, the ini- tial width σ of the spiral launched at rout is explicitly 14 In equation (39), n should take on the values 0, ±1, ±2, etc. While the definition of φm,n (equation 34) also permits values such as n = m − 1, m − 2, . . ., note that, e.g., φm,m−1 = φm,−1. specified rather than being set by disk aspect ratio as it was for a wake launched by a planet. Therefore, we take m∗ ≈ (2σ)−1 as an approximation of the dominant az- imuthal mode number in the homogeneous case. We then have for the arm-to-arm separations and phase spreads φn − φP = 2πn m∗ − ∆km∗ (r(cid:48)) (cid:48) m∗ (cid:90) r (cid:90) r For the case ωp = 0, as adopted in §4, the expressions for φn − φP and δφn take on a simple forms, and δφn = φn − φP = 2πn m∗ and where δφn = g(x) = Ω2(r(cid:48))dr(cid:48) s (r(cid:48))km∗ (r(cid:48)) c2 rout rout (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)2πn + (cid:20) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)2πn + (cid:2)x(q−1)/2 − 1(cid:3) (cid:26) 2 1 − m∗ + q−1 ln(x) (m2∗ − 1)1/2 dr , (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) . (cid:21) g(r/rout) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) , hout (q (cid:54)= 1), (q = 1). g(r/rout) hout(m2∗ − 1)1/2 (41) (42) , (43) (44) (45) 5.2.2. Inner/Outer Disk Asymmetry Our numerical results for planet-driven spirals indicate that multiple spirals robustly form in the inner disk, while only a single spiral forms in the outer disk (ex- cept for small hp, for which a weak secondary spiral is present). Evidently, this asymmetry is related to the be- havior of the integral in equation (39) for small versus large r. In the outer disk, the integral remains bounded. For q = 1, its value for r → ∞ is exactly Ω2(r(cid:48))dr(cid:48) s (r(cid:48))km(r(cid:48)) c2 = − 2 3hp ln[m − (m2 − 1)1/2] (m2 − 1)1/2 . (46) (cid:90) ∞ r+ (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) . (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)2πn − For q < 1, the value of the integral is even less than given above, since the integrand is proportional to r(q−6)/2 for large r. Therefore, for q = 1 and setting m ≈ (2hp)−1 we have 4 3 (47) ln(hp) δφn(∞) ≈ π 4 − Consider δφn with n = −1. If this quantity becomes sufficiently small in the outer disk, a secondary spiral may form. For the fiducial parameters (hp = 0.1), δφ−1(∞) ≈ 3.95. Since this is larger than the critical phase spread necessary for secondary spiral arm forma- tion given in Table 1, no such spiral forms in the outer disk. However, equation (47) also indicates that δφ−1 may become small enough to produce a secondary spiral if hp is small enough. Indeed, in our numerical calculations, a weak secondary spiral is found for hp = 0.05. But the weak (logarithmic) dependence on hp in equation (47) indicates that δφ−1 can become small enough to produce a strong secondary spiral only if hp is very small. can show that(cid:90) r On the other hand, in the inner disk, for r (cid:28) rp, one Ω2(r(cid:48))dr(cid:48) s (r(cid:48))km(r(cid:48)) ≈ c2 g(r/rp) + η (m2 − 1)1/2hp , (48) r− where η is an order unity constant. For q ≤ 1, g(r/rp) (cid:29) 1 for small r, and so δφn (equation 39) must cross zero (indicating constructive interference) before diverging as r → 0. In other words, it is always possible to find a sufficiently small r such that δφn < ∆φ0 (n ≥ 1) for any ∆φ0, and so secondary arm formation is unavoidable in the inner disk. 5.3. Application of Theory to Our Numerical Results We now apply analytical results derived above to un- derstanding certain features of the linear calculations presented in §3 and §4. In Figure 14a -- b we display the theoretical spiral arm phase spreads given by equa- tion (39) for two different values of hp. The critical radii rS20, rS50, and rT20 found in our linear calculations are also indicated. We see that the values of the relevant δφn's at these critical locations are relatively insensitive to hp (as well as to the other disk parameters; see Ta- ble 1). Therefore, equation (38) with properly calibrated ∆ φ0 can be used to reliably predict the location at which the secondary spiral forms. The phase spreads estimated from the numerical spiral arm widths (full width at half maximum for n-th arm, FWHMn), δφn = m∗×FWHMn, which can be compared to the theoretical δφn's, are also shown. The theoretical and numerical spiral arm phase spreads show qualitative agreement. They both vary sim- ilarly with r, although the exact values differ. This may be in part due to the the ambiguity in quantifying the width of a spiral arm found in the numerical calcula- tion (e.g., using the FWHM instead of some other met- ric). Figure 14c -- d shows the theoretical arm separations (equation 36) as well as the arm separations from our numerical results. The theoretical calculation accurately predicts the azimuthal separation between the primary and secondary spirals, but only roughly predicts the sep- aration of the tertiary and primary spirals. This discrep- ancy is possibly due to the fact that the tertiary spiral is not dominated by modes with m ≈ m∗, as assumed in equation (36), but rather by modes with m (cid:46) m∗. The theoretical predictions of the critical radii for sec- ondary spiral formation (for the case of planet-driven spirals) obtained using equations (38) -- (39) are shown in Figure 9. These predictions are calibrated using the val- ues of ∆ φ0 found for the fiducial parameters (i.e. for hp = 0.1). That is, the critical values of δφ1 corre- sponding to different secondary/primary amplitude ra- tios given in Table 1 for the fiducial parameters are taken to be universal values applicable for all parame- ters. These predictions based on simple phase arguments give excellent agreement with the numerical results over a range of disk parameters. The equivalent predictions for the case of passive spi- rals are shown in Figure 12. These predictions also agree well with the numerical results. There are, however, some discrepancies for wide spirals (Fig. 12c). This may be due to the fact that wide spirals are dominated by a small number of azimuthal modes, diminishing the ac- curacy of the approximation (37) for the spread in the 17 TABLE 1 Values of δφn at locations corresponding to several relative amplitudes of the secondary/tertiary spiral arm (where for example, rS50 indicates a 50% relative amplitude of the secondary to the primary). q 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 hp 0.05 0.07 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 φm,n's. 1/2 p 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 3/2 δφ1(rS20) δφ1(rS50) δφ2(rT20) 2.46 2.39 2.27 2.05 2.19 2.12 2.12 2.36 0.62 0.53 0.62 0.52 0.44 0.28 0.33 0.78 5.75 5.92 5.70 5.08 5.59 5.50 5.43 5.85 Given the success of our analytic arguments in explain- ing some key features of our numerical calculations, we can use them to interpret some features of secondary and higher order spiral arms found in this work. The weak dependence of the characteristics of multiple arm on surface density slope p found in both inhomogeneous (§3) and homogeneous (§4) cases is easily understood in the context of mode interference. We showed that this process is well described by the WKB approximation, in which the mode phases are independent of the Σ profile. Rather, they depend only on h(r), which in our param- eterization is fully described by the parameters hp and q. The weak remaining dependence on p in the planet- driven case (see Figure 9c) is likely due to the shift of the Lindblad resonances at which the modes are launched. In the homogeneous case, our choice of ωp = 0 effectively places Lindblad resonances far outside the computation domain suppressing any sensitivity to p, as stated in §4. We can also explain why in the homogeneous case, (az- imuthally) narrower patterns of δΣ produce secondary arm at smaller radii, see Figure 12c. Narrower perturba- tions have their power concentrated in modes of higher m (i.e, they have a larger values of m∗ ≈ (2σ)−1) compared to azimuthally wider perturbations. Equation (44) then predicts that δφn becomes small (resulting in phase co- herence for n = 1, 2 and so on) at lower r/rout as σ is de- creased (and m∗ is increased correspondingly); note that g(x) < 0 in the inner disk, see equation (45). Therefore, narrower perturbations produce high order spiral arms at smaller radii than the wider ones do. 6. DISCUSSION The calculations presented in this work (except for §3.4) are explicitly linear. At the same time, it is well known that nonlinear effects play an important role in the propagation and damping of spiral waves, as well as the evolution of the disk (e.g., Goodman & Rafikov 2001; Rafikov 2002a, 2016; Arzamasskiy & Rafikov 2018). A planet-driven spiral wake begins to shock at a distance of Lsh ∼ (Mp/Mth)−2/5Hp from the planet (in the local approximation), evolving into a wide "N"-shaped wave (Goodman & Rafikov 2001). In the process it deposits its angular momentum into the disk material, so that the an- gular momentum flux of the wave is no longer conserved (as it is in linear theory). This process is modified by the presence of a secondary spiral (Arzamasskiy & Rafikov 2018). Injection of angular momentum originally car- ried by the spiral wave into the disk material drives the 18 Fig. 14. -- The secondary/tertiary phase spreads (equation 39; top panels) and positions (equation 36; bottom panels) predicted by our theoretical phase argument (solid curves) and estimated using numerical calculations (dotted curves). Two different cases are shown: hp = 0.1 (left) and for hp = 0.05 (right), both with q = p = 1. In the top panels, the dashed vertical lines indicate the radii corresponding to several critical relative amplitudes of the secondary/tertiary spirals. The values of the theoretical phase spreads at these critical radii, highlighted by the filled points, are insensitive to the disk parameters. Note that the "reflection" feature of the theoretical δφS in panels a -- b corresponds to a sign change of the quantity inside the absolute value symbol in equation (39). This feature is not seen in the numerical δφS, possibly due to the breakdown of the expansion (37) when the spread in the mode phases is small, as a result of the discreteness of m. evolution of the disk (Arzamasskiy & Rafikov 2018) and causes gap opening (Rafikov 2002b). Our linear calculations are strictly valid only as long as the appearance of the secondary spiral is not preceded by the shocking of the primary arm. This condition sets an upper limit on the allowed planet mass. Indeed, if the secondary spiral emerges after the wake travels a distance ζHp in the inner disk, then the condition Lsh (cid:38) ζHp implies that Mp (cid:46) Mthζ−5/2. In our hp = 0.1 calculation the secondary arm forms at ≈ 5Hp interior to the planet, meaning that ζ ≈ 5 and Mp (cid:46) 0.02Mth is needed for our linear calculation to capture the formation of multiple spirals in quantitative detail. However, at the qualitative level our calculation should remain valid at substantially higher values of Mp (e.g., because nonlinear evolution has only a marginal effect on the analytical phase coherence calculation presented in §5). Nonlinear evolution also affects the morphology of the spirals in the high-Mp regime. Numerical simulations have shown that the azimuthal separation of the sec- Mth) planets, in agreement with our prediction from ondary and primary arms is ≈ 60◦ for low-mass (Mp (cid:28) linear theory, but increases up to ≈ 180◦ for massive (Mp (cid:29) Mth) planets (Dong et al. 2015b; Fung & Dong 2015). This transition is caused by the steady azimuthal broadening of the spiral wake due to its nonlinear evolu- tion in the "N-wave" regime (Goodman & Rafikov 2001; Rafikov 2002a; Zhu et al. 2015). Therefore, the secondary spirals which we find to form by linear processes should be regarded just as precursors to the fully-fledged sec- ondary spiral arms/shocks (see Section 6 of Arzamasskiy & Rafikov 2018). In our linear calculations, the ter- tiary/quaternary arms are always very weak, and so it is unclear how they are affected by nonlinear effects. How- ever note that Dong & Fung (2017) reported the pres- ence of these higher-order arms in nonlinear simulations, although found them to be destroyed by moderate vis- cosity. We note that the global treatment, i.e., accounting for the cylindrical geometry (as opposed to the local, shear- ing sheet approximation), is critical for capturing the formation of multiple spiral arms. We find that the dis- tance from the planet at which the secondary arm forms (which we have defined as point at which its amplitude is 10% of the primary), measured in terms of Hp, is a decreasing function of hp: the secondary arm forms at a distance of ≈ 5Hp from the planet for hp = 0.1, and at ≈ 7.5H from the planet for hp = 0.05. In the lo- cal (shearing sheet/box) approximation, corresponding to the limit hp → 0, in which Hp is the characteristic length scale, this implies that secondary spirals form at r − rp/Hp → ∞. In other words, higher-order spirals would not be captured in the shearing sheet approxi- mation. Furthermore, secondary spirals form almost ex- clusively in the inner disk, and not in the outer disk, an asymmetry that cannot arise in the shearing sheet framework. 0246810δφS/T[rad]hp=0.1(a)δΣS/δΣP=0.2δΣS/δΣP=0.5δΣT/δΣP=0.20246810hp=0.05(b)δΣS/δΣP=0.2δΣS/δΣP=0.5δΣT/δΣP=0.2TheoryδφSδφTNumericalδφSδφT0.050.10.20.51.0r/rp0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0φS/T−φP[rad](c)0.050.10.20.51.0r/rp0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0(d)TheoryφS−φPφT−φPNumericalφS−φPφT−φP6.1. Comparison with Other Work The numerical calculations presented in this paper largely follow those of Ogilvie & Lubow (2002), although we give a more detailed analysis of the results. However, Ogilvie & Lubow (2002) did not report the presence of multiple spirals in their calculations. We find two main reasons for this. First, they only solved for the pertur- bation structure down to a radius of 0.3rp (unlike our calculations, which extend to 0.05rp, allowing the sec- ondary arm to be fully captured). From our Figure 7, we see that for our fiducial parameters, the secondary arm is still quite weak at that radius, with an amplitude about four times smaller than that of the primary arm. In their Figure 5, the first hint of a secondary arm be- comes visible near the inner disk edge, however, it went unnoticed in their discussion. Second, the calculations by Ogilvie & Lubow (2002) were restricted to the case of a constant disk aspect ratio, i.e., q = 1 in our notation. For flared disks, with q < 1, the secondary arm emerges, and also overtakes the primary in amplitude closer to the planet (see Figs. 8 and 9), making its presence more ap- parent. Finally, we note that Ogilvie & Lubow (2002) did point out that the phases ψm of modes with differ- ent m eventually diverge (logarithmically for the case q = 1) towards the inner disk, so that their construc- tive interference fails resulting in the partial dissolution of the primary arm. However, they missed the fact that the same process also results in convergence of ψm to an integer multiple of 2π (implying the same value of δΣm) at different azimuthal locations in the disk, giving rise to higher order spirals (see §5). Rafikov (2002a) arrived at the one-armed spiral so- lution using a method different from Ogilvie & Lubow (2002). In his case the inability to capture the forma- tion of higher-order arms is likely caused by a certain assumption used in the derivation of the linear wake shape, namely the conservation of the Riemann invari- ant along the characteristics that cross (rather than fol- low) the wake. Small changes of this invariant at the wake crossings, neglected in Goodman & Rafikov (2001) and Rafikov (2002a), could be responsible for the even- tual emergence of the secondary spiral. This conjecture is supported by the fact that secondary spiral emerges closer to the planet in disks with lower hp: the number of wake crossings by characteristics (per fixed radial in- terval) grows as hp goes down, facilitating breakdown of the one-spiral solution. Some other ideas for the origin of secondary spirals have been advanced, in particular, nonlinear effects re- lated to ultraharmonic resonances with the planet (Fung & Dong 2015). We do not find these explanations persua- sive as, first, we reproduce multiple spirals in the frame- work of a purely linear calculation. Second, our calcula- tions of passive propagation of a wake with ωp = 0 in §4 do not feature any resonances, and yet, they do result in secondary spirals. 6.2. Applications A possible connection between the multiple spirals driven by a planet and the multiple gaps and rings seen in some protoplanetary disks was suggested by Dong et al. (2017, 2018) and Bae et al. (2017). In the pic- ture put forth by these authors, a low-mass planet in 19 a low-viscosity disk produces multiple spiral arms, each of which shock, dissipate, and open a gap at some dis- tance from the planet. The location of the secondary gap, attributed to the dissipation of the secondary spi- ral, was given by Dong et al. (2018) as a function of planet mass and disk thickness. Our linear prediction for the location at which the secondary spiral forms is exterior to their predicted gap location for small planet masses (Mp (cid:46) 0.2Mth). This is consistent with the sce- nario in which the secondary spiral first forms in a linear fashion at some distance from the planet, then propa- gates inwards, evolving nonlinearly, before shocking and opening a gap. For larger planet masses, Dong et al. (2018) predict a secondary gap at a location too close to the planet for a secondary spiral to have formed in linear theory. In this case, nonlinear effects clearly play a role not just in the dissipation of the spiral, but also in its formation. The multiple spiral features observed in some pro- toplanetary disks may be produced by planets (Dong et al. 2015b). The 180◦ separation of these spirals re- quires massive planets to produce, and so nonlinear ef- fects cannot be neglected in these cases. We nonetheless expect the linear mechanism described in this work to play an important role in providing the conditions neces- sary for the formation of these structures (Arzamasskiy & Rafikov 2018). However, planets are not the only possibility. As we showed in §4, any spiral arm, regardless of its origin, inevitably evolves into multiple spirals as it propagates through the differentially rotating disk (note that the assumption of a Keplerian profile for Ω(r) is not es- sential for the arguments advanced in §5). Therefore, any mechanism capable of producing at least one spi- ral arm necessarily produces multiple spiral arms. Pos- sible mechanisms include gravitational instability (e.g., Dong et al. 2015a), accretion from an infalling envelope (Lesur et al. 2015; Hennebelle et al. 2017), shadows/non- axisymmetric illumination (Montesinos et al. 2016), and vortices (Paardekooper et al. 2010). We only require that density waves with a range of azimuthal mode numbers are excited and that they are at least somewhat in phase with one another, so that one or a few well-defined spiral arms (rather than many flocculent spirals) are produced. 7. SUMMARY We explored the origin of multiple spiral arms, which are often observed in protoplanetary disks and also found in numerical simulations of disks with massive per- turbers. The two-dimensional structure of surface den- sity perturbations induced by a planet (as well as that of a passive spiral) was computed using linear theory of density wave excitation and propagation (Goldreich & Tremaine 1979) in the low planet mass (low amplitude) regime. We find that, in addition to the strong single spiral arm excited by the planet in agreement with past studies (Ogilvie & Lubow 2002; Rafikov 2002a), a secondary spi- ral arm (and often a tertiary arm, quaternary arm, and so on) robustly forms in inner disk in the linear regime. The secondary arm first appears at about r = (0.4 − 0.6)rp, and, though initially weak, becomes stronger and nar- rower towards the center of the disk, eventually exceeding strength of primary arm at ≈ 0.1rp. As the primary arm 20 propagates into the inner disk, the angular momentum flux it carries gets steadily transferred to these higher- order spiral arms. In the outer disk, we find that a sec- ondary spiral arm typically does not form, except for the coldest disk we considered, with hp = 0.05. We provide analytical arguments extending the rea- soning of Ogilvie & Lubow (2002), which show that sec- ondary spiral arms form as a result of the constructive in- terference among different azimuthal modes in the inner disk. Our treatment, which implicitly takes into account the global variation of both the phases and amplitudes of different linear modes in a self-consistent manner, thus corroborates the semi-quantitative, phase coherence pic- ture previously put forth by Bae & Zhu (2018a) in the WKB limit. The gravitational potential of the planet does not play a role in this process. Rather, the planet only seeds the initial perturbation, which then prop- agates passively and spawns higher-order spiral arms. This is confirmed by the persistent emergence of mul- tiple spirals also in our linear calculations of the passive inward propagation of an imposed spiral wake, free from the influence of an external potential (following the setup of Arzamasskiy & Rafikov 2018). Our results clearly demonstrate that the formation of secondary spirals is an intrinsically linear process, which serves as a precursor for subsequent nonlinear evolution resulting in a formation of multiple shocks in the disk. These calculations should help us better un- derstand planet-driven evolution of protoplanetary disk (Goodman & Rafikov 2001; Rafikov 2002a), including the formation of multiple gaps in such disks (Bae et al. 2017; Dong et al. 2017, 2018). We use them to understand the details of the global distribution of the torque exerted by an embedded planet on a disk in Miranda & Rafikov (in prep.). Financial support for this study has been provided by NSF via grant AST-1409524 and NASA via grant 15- XRP15-2-0139. We thank Stephen Lubow and Gordon Ogilvie for valuable comments. We are grateful to Wing- Kit Lee for a careful reading of this paper and for a num- ber of useful suggestions. Fig. 15. -- Fractional error in the phase gradient before and after refinement for the m = 10 mode, with the fiducial parameters hp = 0.1, q = 1 and p = 1. satisfies any pair of specified boundary conditions at the boundaries rin and rout, can be expressed as δhm = a1δh(1) H + a2δh(2) H + δhIH, (A1) where a1 and a2 are constants determined by the specific form of the boundary conditions. We choose outgoing wave boundary conditions, with (cid:48) (cid:48) m(rin) = Cinδhm(rin), δh δh m(rout) = Coutδhm(rout), (cid:18) DS (cid:19) rΣk (A2) , (A3) APPENDIX NUMERICAL PROCEDURE Mode Solutions where C = ik + 1 2 d dr ln Here we give a detailed description of the numerical method used for producing solutions of equation (6). We compute the values of Laplace coefficients, as well as their derivatives required for equation (6) (by first differenti- ating the integrand of equation (13) with respect to α) using numerical quadrature. We remove the corotation pole (ω = 0) in equation (6) by replacing ω with ω + iδ, where δ is a small positive real constant (KP93). We choose δ = 10−6. The solution method closely follows the technique de- scribed in detail by KP93, with several small differ- ences. We first produce two linearly independent so- lutions, δh(1) H of the homogeneous version of equation (6), by integrating outwards from corotation starting from arbitrary initial values, as well as an inho- mogeneous solution, δhIH. The desired solution, which H and δh(2) representing an outgoing wave in the WKB limit (e.g., Tsang & Lai 2008). Here k = (−DS)1/2/cs is the radial wavenumber. Note that second term in equation (A3), describing the slow change in amplitude of the wave, was not included by KP93 at this step (although they took it into account in an approximate fashion at a later step). Now that we have specified the boundary conditions, we have a system of equations which can be solved for a1 and a2: (cid:20) d (cid:20) d dr dr δh(1) H (rin) − Cinδh(1) H (rin) − Cinδh(2) + δh(2) =CinδhIH(rin) − d dr δhIH(rin), H (rin) H (rin) a1 a2 (A4) (cid:21) (cid:21) -0.04-0.03-0.02-0.010.000.01ǫ10/k10(a)BeforeRefinement-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.010.000.010.10.31.03.0r/rp(b)AfterRefinement21 Fig. 16. -- Two-dimensional map in polar coordinates (r, φ) of the fractional surface density perturbation δΣ/Σ (scaled by the ratio pM∗), produced using different values of mmax, the number of azimuthal modes of the planet mass, Mp, to the thermal mass, Mth = h3 synthesized. The case shown here uses the fiducial parameters. (cid:20) d (cid:20) d dr dr (cid:21) (cid:21) δh(1) H (rout) − Coutδh(1) H (rout) − Coutδh(2) H (rout) H (rout) + δh(2) a1 a2 (A5) =CoutδhIH(rout) − d dr δhIH(rout). As in KP93, once we have found the values of a1 and a2 and constructed a solution satisfying the boundary conditions, we generate a new inhomogeneous solution δhIH using the "correct" values of δh and δh(cid:48) at corota- tion (i.e., the ones found from the previously constructed solution). The system of equations (A4 -- A5) is then re- solved for new values of a1 and a2. This process ensures that the final solution is robust with respect to the spe- cific choice of (arbitrary) homogeneous solutions used in its construction (equation A1), because it tends to reduce the absolute values of a1 and a2, so that the contributions to the correct solution from the homogeneous solutions are small. As a final refinement step, also described in KP93, we minimize the amplitude of the oscillations of the "phase gradient error" near the boundaries. The phase gradient error, defined as (cid:48) = Arg(δh) − k, (A6) serves as a diagnostic of how close the solution is to an outgoing WKB wave. The phase gradient error of the ini- tial solution exhibits oscillations, representing contami- nation by an in incoming wave, near the boundaries. We seek to minimize the amplitude of these oscillations by slightly adjusting the constants Cin and Cout (so that they are no longer given exactly by equation A3) charac- terizing the boundary conditions. In principle there are a variety of ways to achieve this (note that the exact pro- cedure used by KP93 is not specified). We choose to min- imize the peak-to-peak amplitudes of the phase gradient error within one local scale height of each boundary: Xin = [max() − min()]rin<r<rin+H(rin), Xout = [max() − min()]rout−H(rout)<r<rout . (A7) (A8) Note that we also tried minimizing the derivative of the phase gradient error (cid:48) at rin and rout, but found that this was not as effective at getting rid of the oscillations. We numerically compute the Jacobian describing the deriva- tives of X = (Xin, Xout) with respect to C = (Cin, Cout), and use its inverse to perform one step of the secant method to find the root of X(C). This greatly reduces the amplitude of the oscillations of the phase gradient error, see Figure 15 for an example of this process. In practice this refinement only requires changing the val- ues of Cin and Cout by a very small amount ((cid:46) 1%). Also note that this refinement produces only very imper- ceptible changes in the form of δh(r) and δh(cid:48)(r), but is potentially important for ensuring that different modes have the correct phase when the interference of many modes is considered. −0.50.00.5(φ−φp)/π0.10.31.03.0r/rp(a)mmax=10−0.50.00.5(φ−φp)/π(b)mmax=20−0.50.00.5(φ−φp)/π(c)mmax=40−0.50.00.5(φ−φp)/π(d)mmax=80−2.0−1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0(Mp/Mth)−1δΣ/Σ22 As noted in §2, we do not include the indirect poten- tial term δm,1GMpr/r2 p in our calculations. This term is proportional to r, and so becomes large for r (cid:29) rp, in contrast to the direct terms (equation 12), which be- come small for r (cid:29) rp (note that they both become small for r (cid:28) rp). Therefore, for m (cid:54)= 1, equation (6) becomes effectively homogeneous for r (cid:29) rp. Our solu- tion method exploits this fact by using knowledge of the asymptotic behavior of the homogeneous equation to set the outer disk boundary condition (and similarly for the inner boundary condition). However, for m = 1, when the indirect term is included, its anomalous behavior at large r calls into question the validity of setting the outer boundary condition in this way. We nonetheless carried out several tests in which the indirect potential was in- cluded and the outer boundary condition was set under the homogeneous assumption. We verified that including the the indirect potential in this way only slightly modi- fies the profile of the density wake in the outer disk, but does not otherwise affect our main results. Mode Synthesis The two-dimensional surface density perturbation δΣ(r, φ) is synthesized from the mode solutions δhm us- ing equations (9) and (14). In order to produce an accu- rate solution, a sufficient number of modes (up to some mmax) must be used. The solution must be converged with respect to mmax, i.e., the perturbation structure should not change as more modes are added. The value mmax required for convergence of the two-dimensional surface density is several times larger than the cutoff pa- rameter mcut ≈ h−1 p . Figure 16 illustrates this point by revealing spurious features in the distribution of δΣ(r, φ) for low mmax = (1−2)h−1 (panels a -- b). Therefore, in all of our calculations we choose mmax ≈ 8mcut, for which Figure 16d demonstrates convergence. p REFERENCES Arzamasskiy, L., & Rafikov, R. R. 2018, ApJ, 854, 84 Bae, J., & Zhu, Z. 2018a, ApJ, 859, 118 -- . 2018b, ApJ, 859, 119 Bae, J., Zhu, Z., & Hartmann, L. 2017, ApJ, 850, 201 Baruteau, C., & Masset, F. 2008, ApJ, 672, 1054 Benisty, M., Juhasz, A., Boccaletti, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, L6 Ben´ıtez-Llambay, P., & Masset, F. S. 2016, ApJS, 223, 11 de Val-Borro, M., Edgar, R. G., Artymowicz, P., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 529 Dong, R., & Fung, J. 2017, ApJ, 835, 38 Dong, R., Fung, J., & Chiang, E. 2016a, ApJ, 826, 75 Dong, R., Hall, C., Rice, K., & Chiang, E. 2015a, ApJ, 812, L32 Dong, R., Li, S., Chiang, E., & Li, H. 2017, ApJ, 843, 127 -- . 2018, ApJ, 866, 110 Dong, R., Zhu, Z., Fung, J., et al. 2016b, ApJ, 816, L12 Dong, R., Zhu, Z., Rafikov, R. R., & Stone, J. M. 2015b, ApJ, 809, L5 Fung, J., & Dong, R. 2015, ApJ, 815, L21 Garufi, A., Quanz, S. P., Avenhaus, H., et al. 2013, A&A, 560, A105 Goldreich, P., Goodman, J., & Narayan, R. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 339 Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1979, ApJ, 233, 857 -- . 1980, ApJ, 241, 425 Goodman, J., & Rafikov, R. R. 2001, ApJ, 552, 793 Grady, C. A., Muto, T., Hashimoto, J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 762, 48 Hennebelle, P., Lesur, G., & Fromang, S. 2017, A&A, 599, A86 Korycansky, D. G., & Pollack, J. B. 1993, Icarus, 102, 150 Lee, W.-K. 2016, ApJ, 832, 166 Lesur, G., Hennebelle, P., & Fromang, S. 2015, A&A, 582, L9 Lin, M.-K. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 3806 Lin, M.-K., & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1445 Maire, A.-L., Stolker, T., Messina, S., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A134 Montesinos, M., Perez, S., Casassus, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, L8 Muto, T., Grady, C. A., Hashimoto, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, L22 Ogilvie, G. I., & Lubow, S. H. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 950 Ostriker, E. C., Shu, F. H., & Adams, F. C. 1992, ApJ, 399, 192 Paardekooper, S.-J., Lesur, G., & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 2010, ApJ, 725, 146 Petrovich, C., & Rafikov, R. R. 2012, ApJ, 758, 33 Rafikov, R. R. 2002a, ApJ, 569, 997 -- . 2002b, ApJ, 572, 566 -- . 2016, ApJ, 831, 122 Rafikov, R. R., & Petrovich, C. 2012, ApJ, 747, 24 Stolker, T., Dominik, C., Avenhaus, H., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A113 Tsang, D. 2014, ApJ, 782, 112 Tsang, D., & Lai, D. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 446 Wagner, K., Apai, D., Kasper, M., & Robberto, M. 2015, ApJ, 813, L2 Wagner, K., Dong, R., Sheehan, P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 130 Ward, W. R. 1997, Icarus, 126, 261 Zhu, Z., Dong, R., Stone, J. M., & Rafikov, R. R. 2015, ApJ, 813, 88
1801.05781	1	1801	2018-01-17T18:10:16	The Propitious Role of Solar Energetic Particles in the Origin of Life	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.HE", "astro-ph.SR", "physics.bio-ph", "physics.space-ph" ]	We carry out 3-D numerical simulations to assess the penetration and bombardment effects of Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs), i.e. high-energy particle bursts during large flares and superflares, on ancient and current Mars. We demonstrate that the deposition of SEPs is non-uniform at the planetary surface, and that the corresponding energy flux is lower than other sources postulated to have influenced the origin of life. Nevertheless, SEPs may have been capable of facilitating the synthesis of a wide range of vital organic molecules (e.g. nucleobases and amino acids). Owing to the relatively high efficiency of these pathways, the overall yields might be comparable to (or even exceed) the values predicted for some conventional sources such as electrical discharges and exogenous delivery by meteorites. We also suggest that SEPs could have played a role in enabling the initiation of lightning. A notable corollary of our work is that SEPs may constitute an important mechanism for prebiotic synthesis on exoplanets around M-dwarfs, thereby mitigating the deficiency of biologically active ultraviolet radiation on these planets. Although there are several uncertainties associated with (exo)planetary environments and prebiotic chemical pathways, our study illustrates that SEPs represent a potentially important factor in understanding the origin of life.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version January 18, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 THE PROPITIOUS ROLE OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE ORIGIN OF LIFE Manasvi Lingam,1, 2 Chuanfei Dong,3, 4 Xiaohua Fang,5 Bruce M. Jakosky,5 and Abraham Loeb1, 2 1Institute for Theory and Computation, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138, USA 2Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 3Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA 4Princeton Center for Heliophysics, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA 5Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA ABSTRACT We carry out 3-D numerical simulations to assess the penetration and bombardment effects of Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs), i.e. high-energy particle bursts during large flares and superflares, on ancient and current Mars. We demonstrate that the deposition of SEPs is non-uniform at the planetary surface, and that the corresponding energy flux is lower than other sources postulated to have influenced the origin of life. Nevertheless, SEPs may have been capable of facilitating the synthesis of a wide range of vital organic molecules (e.g. nucleobases and amino acids). Owing to the relatively high efficiency of these pathways, the overall yields might be comparable to (or even exceed) the values predicted for some conventional sources such as electrical discharges and exogenous delivery by meteorites. We also suggest that SEPs could have played a role in enabling the initiation of lightning. A notable corollary of our work is that SEPs may constitute an important mechanism for prebiotic synthesis on exoplanets around M-dwarfs, thereby mitigating the deficiency of biologically active ultraviolet radiation on these planets. Although there are several uncertainties associated with (exo)planetary environments and prebiotic chemical pathways, our study illustrates that SEPs represent a potentially important factor in understanding the origin of life. 8 1 0 2 n a J 7 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 1 8 7 5 0 . 1 0 8 1 : v i X r a Corresponding author: Manasvi Lingam & Chuanfei Dong [email protected] & [email protected] 2 1. INTRODUCTION Our understanding of solar flares and associated phe- nomena, such as Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs) and Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), has improved greatly in recent times, both from a theoretical and observa- tional standpoint (Webb & Howard 2012; Reames 2013; Priest 2014; Comisso et al. 2016; Benz 2017). These dis- coveries have been supplemented by a wealth of data from the Kepler mission, which surveyed ∼ 105 stars and yielded detailed statistics concerning the frequency of large flares with energies & 1033 ergs (superflares) on M-, K-, and G-type stars (Maehara et al. 2012; Shibayama et al. 2013; Candelaresi et al. 2014). Hence, there has been a concomitant increase in stud- ies analyzing the effects of flares and superflares on plan- ets situated in the habitable zone (HZ) of their host stars, i.e. the region in which liquid water can theoret- ically exist on the surface of the planet (Kasting et al. 1993). Since large flares are usually accompanied by bursts of high-energy radiation and particles, most stud- ies have highlighted their deleterious effects from the perspective of habitability. The dangers posed by SEPs are especially significant since they may cause significant ozone depletion and biological damage (Dartnell 2011; Melott & Thomas 2011; Lingam & Loeb 2017a). How- ever, recent evidence intriguingly suggests that flares could have played a beneficial role in the origin of life (abiogenesis) by delivering the requisite energy for the prebiotic synthesis of organic compounds (Buccino et al. 2007; Airapetian et al. 2016; Nava-Sedeno et al. 2016; Ranjan et al. 2017a; Lingam & Loeb 2017b,c). It is therefore the goal of this paper to examine the potential role of SEPs, specifically energetic protons, in facilitating surface-based prebiotic chemistry. In this work, we shall not tackle non-surficial theories for the origin of life, such as hydrothermal vents (Martin et al. 2008; Russell et al. 2014), since the SEP fluxes are not expected to be significant in these environments. We will focus on ancient and current Mars, primarily mo- tivated by the fact that the habitability of both en- vironments has been extensively investigated (McKay 1997; Schulze-Makuch et al. 2008; Westall et al. 2013; Cockell 2014). Furthermore, some authors have ar- gued that the biological potential of Noachian Mars was similar to, or slightly greater than, that of Hadean Earth (Jakosky & Shock 1998; Nisbet & Sleep 2001; Gollihar et al. 2014; Benner & Kim 2015) although its current value is several orders of magnitude smaller than present-day Earth (Summers et al. 2002); there also exists a remote possibility that life on Earth was seeded by Martian ejecta (Davis & McKay 1996; Mileikowsky et al. 2000). Subsequently, we will gener- alize our results to encompass exoplanets, with atmo- spheres resembling early Mars, orbiting low-mass stars (K- and M-dwarfs). 2. SIMULATION SETUP AND RESULTS We adopt the neutral atmosphere from the Mars Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model (M-GITM) (Bougher et al. 2015), which is a 3-D whole atmosphere (ground-to-exobase) code that captures the Martian lower atmosphere and its thermosphere-ionosphere. It is particularly noteworthy that M-GITM, unlike previous General Circulation Models (GCMs), does not rely on the hydrostatic assumption and can therefore deal with large vertical velocities (Ridley et al. 2006; Deng et al. 2008). This feature is particularly relevant since ver- tical winds must be taken into account when dealing with extreme space weather events, for e.g. CMEs and heating due to pickup ions (Fang et al. 2013a). To simulate the "current" Martian atmosphere, we use Ps = 6 mbar and 1 EUV, while the "ancient" Mars at- mosphere ∼ 4 Gya is chosen to be Ps ≈ 1 bar and 10 EUV (Ribas et al. 2005; Boesswetter et al. 2010); here, Ps denotes the surface pressure whereas 1 EUV refers to the extreme ultraviolet (EUV) flux under current solar moderate conditions. It should be noted, however, that the exact value of Ps for Noachian Mars is unknown, and it could have been lower than 1 bar (Tian et al. 2009); a more tenous atmosphere would lead to an enhanced SEP flux at the surface for a given event. Next, we need to choose a particular SEP event to undertake our simula- tions. The input spectrum at the top of the atmosphere is adopted from the energetic January 2005 SEP event, and corresponds to an energy flux (per unit energy) of 5 × 1011 pr cm−2 MeV−1 at 0.1 MeV, while the associ- ated spectral index is −2.15 (Mewaldt et al. 2012). We note that the 2005 SEP event has been studied previ- ously as a representative example of a high-fluence solar proton event (associated with an X7 solar flare) in the context of prebiotic chemistry (Airapetian et al. 2016). SEP events with total fluences greater than the January 2005 event have been documented (Mewaldt 2006), and hence it might constitute a representative example for the active young Sun. However, it must be recognized that the SEP spectrum and initial flare energy are not necessarily correlated, since the causal mechanisms for SEPs are complex and varied (Reames 2013). To calculate the penetration of SEPs through the at- mosphere, we apply a continuously slowing down ap- proximation (CSDA) energy loss model that was devel- oped by Jackman et al. (1980) and recently improved by Fang et al. (2013b). The model has been extensively validated for energetic particle transport, showing ex- cellent agreement with results from more sophisticated collision-by-collision calculations of the combined pri- mary ion effects (Fang et al. 2004; Jolitz et al. 2017) and secondary electron effects (Lummerzheim et al. 1989). Due to the lack of reliable collisional cross-section mea- surements, the collision-by-collision method cannot be extended to high-energy particles beyond ∼ 1 MeV. In contrast, the stopping power data published by the Na- tional Institute of Standards and Technology covers a broader energy range, up to 10 GeV (Berger et al. 2011). 3 Figure 1. Panel (a) illustrates the globally averaged differential number flux distribution at the planetary surface. Different colors represent cases with varying cutoffs marked at the top. The black dashed line shows the precipitating SEP energy spectral shape for reference. Panel (b) depicts the altitude profiles of penetrating SEP energy fluxes near the subsolar point under current (in black) and ancient (in red) atmospheric conditions. The energy fluxes are divided according to different energy ranges of incident particles at the topside boundary, as marked in the figure. Panel (c) presents the globally averaged ionization altitude profiles for < 1 GeV and < 6 GeV SEP precipitation in the current (black) and ancient (red) Martian atmosphere respectively. The shaded regions demarcate the range of values at different latitudes and longitudes. In Fig. 1(a), the penetrating SEP energy spectrum at the surface is shown for current and ancient Mars. From Fig. 1(b), it is seen that SEPs with initial energy lower than ∼ 150 MeV (black dotted and dashed lines) are unable to penetrate through the current Martian atmo- sphere, and only those energetic particles with energies & 150 MeV (black dashed-dotted line) can reach the surface; the same cutoff value has also been presented 4 Figure 2. Atmospheric column mass density and penetrating SEP flux at the surface for current (< 1 GeV) and ancient (< 6 GeV) Mars as a function of latitude and local time. by the Mars Science Laboratory's Curiosity rover group (Hassler et al. 2014). In contrast, the much thicker at- mosphere assumed in the ancient epoch effectively pre- vents the penetration of . 150 MeV particles above 40 km altitude (red dotted line). In fact, the threshold en- ergy for incident SEPs being able to reach the surface through the ancient Martian atmosphere is elevated to ∼ 3 GeV. Note that the threshold penetration energies of ∼ 150 MeV and ∼ 3 GeV, for current and ancient Mars respectively, vary slightly over the planet due to the spatial asymmetry of the atmospheres. The inci- dent SEP spectrum at the top of the atmosphere is also shown for reference in Fig. 1(a). In Fig. 2, column mass density and SEP energy de- position on the planetary surface as a function of lat- itude and longitude is presented. This is one of the notable features of our study since our simulations are fully 3-D and thus display signatures of asymmetry (Bougher et al. 2006, 2015). For current and ancient Mars, the SEP energy flux broadly increases as one moves to higher latitudes. Moreover, for both cases, the energy flux is generally higher on the night-side relative to the day-side. The temperature difference between the day- and night-side affects the global neutral density dis- tribution - see column mass density in Fig. 2 - and con- sequently the SEP energy deposition at the planetary surface is altered, thus leading to the observed asymme- try. These asymmetric features are less pronounced for ancient Mars due to significant day-to-night transport caused by the strong day-side EUV heating; the trans- port leads to a relatively uniform distribution of the at- mosphere around Mars. The resulting consequences are explored further in Sec. 3.3. We have neglected the effects of weak planetary mag- netic fields on SEPs in our simulations. Once the Mar- tian dynamo stopped functioning ∼ 4.1 Gya, the mag- netic field strength is believed to have declined rapidly (Lillis et al. 2008; Fassett & Head 2011; Lillis et al. 2013); note, however, that a later age has been pro- posed for the shutdown of the Martian dynamo by some authors (Schubert et al. 2000). The high energy of SEPs in conjunction with weak magnetic fields result in a very large gyroradius that may even exceed the planetary scale, suggesting that the deflection of SEPs by weak magnetic fields is minimal. Exoplanets around M-dwarfs could also be characterized by weak magnetic fields (Shields et al. 2016), and will be discussed later in Sec. 3.4. 3. IMPLICATIONS FOR PREBIOTIC CHEMISTRY We study some of the ensuing implications of the above results for Noachian Mars and other exoplanets (with similar atmospheres) in the HZ of their host stars. 3.1. Energy source for prebiotic chemistry The origin of life required suitable energy sources for the synthesis of prebiotic compounds (Ehrenfreund et al. 2002; Morowitz & Smith 2007; Luisi 2016; Walker 2017). Commonly studied energy pathways in this regard include solar radiation, shock heating from impacts, electrical discharges, radioactivity, volcan- ism and geochemical energy (Miller & Urey 1959; Maher & Stevenson 1988; Chyba & Sagan 1992; Pascal 2012; Ruiz-Mirazo et al. 2014). It is therefore advan- tageous to estimate the energy available through SEPs that reach the surface and compare them against the aforementioned sources. The energy flux ΦE (in units of J m−2 s−1) can be estimated as follows: ΦE = N φE, (1) where φE is the globally averaged energy per unit area deposited on the planetary surface (during a characteris- tic SEP event) and N is the number of such SEP events per day.1 Our simulations yield φE = 1.5 × 10−1 J/m2 for ancient Mars, and we must now determine the value of N . The study of ∼ 105 G-type stars by Kepler yielded a power-law distribution for the occurrence frequency of superflares with a spectral index α between −1.5 and 1 In reality, ΦE is time-averaged, and it is higher during the transient flaring period. 5 −2.3 (Maehara et al. 2012, 2015). It has been suggested that superflares can occur on the Sun (Shibata et al. 2013; Mekhaldi et al. 2015), although the evidence re- mains disputed (Schrijver et al. 2012). A similar power- law scaling has been inferred for regular flares on the Sun, but the spectral index is slightly different when compared to the corresponding estimate for superflares (Crosby et al. 1993; Hannah et al. 2011). As we are concerned with the young Sun, expected to have been more active ∼ 4.0 Gya (Gudel 2007), it seems reasonable to assume that it obeyed statistics similar to active G-type stars; the latter are predicted to have a su- perflare occurrence rate of 0.1 per day (Shibayama et al. 2013). However, we caution that the young Sun was not necessarily characterized by statistics similar to active solar-type stars studied by the Kepler mission. With this caveat in mind, we use the above value to con- clude that the frequency N0 of Carrington-type events for the ancient young Sun may have been N0 . 40 per day, which is lower by a factor of ∼ 6 compared to Airapetian et al. (2016); these events are less pow- erful than superflares but occur more frequently with adequate energy release. Although large flares are often accompanied by CMEs and SEPs (Emslie et al. 2012; Reames 2013; Desai & Giacalone 2016), not every such event will impact the planet. The number of impacting events is approximately estimated to be N = N0 sin2(cid:18) θ 2(cid:19) , (2) 0 sin θ′dθ′R 2π cles, i.e. Ω/4π where we have Ω = R θ where the second factor is purely geometric, and is based on non-isotropic emission with an opening angle θ. It stems from the solid angle fraction of the emitted parti- 0 dφ′ = 2π (1 − cos θ). The opening angle ranges between 20◦ and 120◦ and we select a fiducial value of θ ∼ 47◦ based on observational evidence (Yashiro et al. 2004). Upon substituting this value into (2), we find N . 6 events per day. In reality, N will be even lower since other factors (e.g. magnetic field orientation) should be taken into consideration (Gopalswamy et al. 2007). We will there- fore normalize N by 1 event per day; see also Odert et al. (2017) in this context. Using this data in (1), we find ΦE = 0.05 f (cid:18) N 1 day−1(cid:19) kJ m−2 yr−1, (3) where we have introduced the enhancement factor f due to the following reason. We have implicitly assumed that only Carrington-type flares contribute to solar proton events impacting the planet. However, in reality, super- Carrington events with flare energies & 1033 ergs are expected to exist, as mentioned earlier (Shibata et al. 2013). Although these events are rarer, they would be characterized by higher SEP fluences (Takahashi et al. 2016). Thus, f & 1 serves as the enhancement fac- tor arising from these events, and is determined from 6 the ratio of the cumulative and probability distribution functions describing the frequency of flares (with a given energy), and will depend on both α and the energy cutoff (Newman 2005). We will normalize f by unity hence- forth, since f = 1 constitutes the lower bound. The value of ΦE in (3) is lower than some energy fluxes on ancient Earth by 1-2 orders of magnitude (Deamer & Weber 2010), such as electrical discharges (2.9 kJ m−2 yr−1) and volcanism (5.4 kJ m−2 yr−1). However, it is worth noting that other energy sources are much higher, for e.g. the energy flux from solar UV radiation is about 7 orders of magnitude greater. It must also be pointed out that the energy flux due to volcanism might have been much higher on early Mars (Halevy & Head 2014). Here, we have compared ΦE for Noachian Mars with other energy sources on Hadean- Archean Earth, since a comprehensive knowledge of the corresponding energy fluxes for ancient Mars is cur- rently lacking. However, in light of the many unknowns, the above estimates should not be perceived as being definitive. E & ΦMars E We can conjecture that ΦEarth because: (i) the SEP fluence falls off with the square of the distance (Feynman et al. 1993; Cooper et al. 2003), and (ii) the surface pressures and atmospheric compositions of an- cient Mars and Earth appear to have been fairly similar (McKay 2010; Arndt & Nisbet 2012; Wordsworth 2016). Since the SEP energy flux at the planetary surface de- pends on the incident SEP fluence and atmospheric properties, (i) and (ii) would therefore collectively imply that the SEP energy flux for Hadean-Archean Earth was higher than, or comparable to, that of Noachian Mars. Hence, the same conclusions discussed previously in the context of ΦMars , such as the comparison of the SEP energy flux against other sources (e.g. volcanism and lightning). would also be valid for ΦEarth E E It is possible to compute the number flux ΦN of SEPs through a similar procedure. Thus, we estimate ΦN via ΦN = f N φN , (4) where f is the enhancement factor introduced earlier, N is the number of Carrington-type SEP events per day, and φN ∼ 7.5 × 108 cm−2 from our simulations. Upon substituting these values into (4), we end up with ΦN = 8 × 103 f (cid:18) N 1 day−1(cid:19) cm−2 s−1, (5) and further implications are discussed in Sec. 3.3. 3.2. Chemical pathways for prebiotic synthesis Previously, we have argued that SEPs provide a valu- able source of energy for prebiotic synthesis and that their energy flux is lower compared to lightning and vol- canism. It is, however, important not only to evaluate the energy fluxes from different sources but also their efficiency in terms of chemical synthesis (Deamer 1997). SEPs are known to facilitate the formation of nitro- gen oxides, for e.g. nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), by reacting with atmospheric nitro- gen (Crutzen et al. 1975; L´opez-Puertas et al. 2005).2 It was noted in Airapetian et al. (2016) that these molecules reacted with the chemical species CH as fol- lows: NO + CH → HCN + O, N2O + CH → HCN + NO, (6) thereby resulting in the production of hydrogen cyanide (HCN). In addition, other pathways besides (6) lead- ing to SEP-driven HCN formation were also iden- tified. HCN is important in prebiotic chemistry (Ferris & Hagan 1984) because it is required for the only known pathways leading to the prebiotic synthe- sis of (i) nucleic acids, (ii) proteins, and (iii) lipids through reductive homologation (Patel et al. 2015); in turn, these molecules are postulated to have been impor- tant components of protocells. The chemical reactions leading to (i)-(iii) occur in the presence of UV radiation with hydrogen sulphide (H2S) serving as the reductant. It has therefore been argued that HCN is an impor- tant "feedstock" molecule that may play a vital role in abiogenesis (Sutherland 2016). Hence, SEPs (and other energy sources) enable the production of HCN, which can undergo further UV-mediated chemical reactions to generate the above prebiotic compounds. However, a possible limitation is that HCN needs to be transported from the atmosphere to the surface, where the pathways of Patel et al. (2015) are functional. Most of the basic ingredients presumably required for SEP-driven prebiotic synthesis, such as N2, CO, CO2, H2O, H2S and CH4, are expected to have been present on Noachian Mars, although the exact composition re- mains very uncertain (Owen 1992; Jakosky & Phillips 2001; Farquhar et al. 2000; Formisano et al. 2004; Halevy et al. 2007; Webster et al. 2015; Wordsworth 2016); these ingredients were also potentially available on ancient Earth for prebiotic synthesis (Zahnle et al. 2010; Arndt & Nisbet 2012). Moreover, the bioactive UV flux ∼ 4 Gya emitted by the Sun is predicted to have been a few times times higher than its present-day value (Rugheimer et al. 2015; Rapf & Vaida 2016), which can enable independent UV-mediated prebiotic chemistry (Ranjan & Sasselov 2017; Ranjan et al. 2017b). Thus, it appears plausible that prebiotic pathways driven by SEPs (and UV radiation) were functional on ancient Mars and Earth, consequently rendering both planets conducive to the origin of life in this particular scenario. 2 Nitrous oxide (if produced) is a potent greenhouse gas (Canfield et al. 2010; Airapetian et al. 2016), and may therefore partly provide a resolution of the "faint young Sun" paradox (Sagan & Mullen 1972; Kasting 2010; Feulner 2012). In addition, gaseous mixtures - comprising of CO, CO2, N2 and H2O - have also been shown in the labo- ratory (i.e., under controlled conditions) to yield a wide range of organic compounds when subjected to irradia- tion by energetic protons with energies greater than a few MeV. The organic molecules thus produced in the laboratory could, in principle, also be directly synthe- sized by SEPs. A few examples of the salient organic compounds synthesized through this process include the following: • Uracil, guanine, adenine and cytosine (Kobayashi et al. 1990; Miyakawa et al. 2002b), which represent four of the five nucleobases of RNA and DNA. The absence of thymine (DNA only) might fa- vor the emergence of RNA prior to DNA, in ac- cordance with the RNA world hypothesis (Joyce 2002; Orgel 2004). In contrast, meteorites ostensi- bly lack cytosine as well as thymine, thus making the eventual synthesis of both RNA and DNA (via this route) rather difficult (Pearce & Pudritz 2016). • Amino acids such as alanine, aspartic acid, glycine and serine (Kobayashi et al. 1998; Miyakawa et al. 2002b); most of these biomolecules are considered essential for protein synthesis (Weber & Miller 1981; Zaia et al. 2008; Higgs & Pudritz 2009) and some authors have suggested that the co-evolution of amino acids and nucleic acids might have oc- curred (Koonin & Novozhilov 2009). Some of these proteinogenic amino acids have also been produced by means of UV-mediated chemical pathways starting from HCN, as noted previously (McCollom 2013; Sutherland 2017). • Aromatic compounds, e.g. imidazole (Kobayashi et al. 1995), which could play an important role in abio- genesis (Ehrenfreund et al. 2006). • Hydrogen cyanide, formaldehyde and complex amino acid precursors (Kobayashi et al. 1998). Furthermore, if ammonia is unavailable in primordial planetary atmospheres, it has been suggested that ir- radiation by high-energy protons would be an impor- tant pathway for the synthesis of amino acid precursors (Kobayashi et al. 2001). Lastly, the G-values associated with amino acid synthesis through irradiation by ener- getic protons (∼ 0.01) are amongst the highest docu- mented for prebiotic pathways (Kobayashi et al. 1990). This is an important point since it indicates that, de- spite the lower energy flux of SEPs, the resultant yield of organic molecules can be higher when compared to a few other energy sources. We will further quantify this statement by focusing on proteinogenic amino acids and nucleobases, i.e. the building blocks of proteins and nucleic acids respectively. 7 However, before proceeding further, a few caveats are worth noting here. Given the significant uncertainties concerning the state of early Earth's atmosphere(s), the gaseous mixtures considered in the above papers could have been more reducing than that of the Hadean- Archean Earth. Second, the yields are dependent on the atmospheric composition, i.e. on the partial pres- sure of CO. Lastly, the experiments carried out relied on irradiation by protons of ∼ 3 MeV, whereas the en- ergies of SEPs can attain maximum values of a few GeV. As there is no experimental evidence available currently concerning prebiotic synthesis by particles at these en- ergies, we will henceforth operate under the assumption that protons of different energies impact prebiotic chem- istry uniformly; a similar assumption has also been in- voked in analyzing endergonic chemical reactions driven by cosmic rays (Miyakawa et al. 2002b). Although such an assumption will be utilized for carrying out quanti- tative estimates, we emphasize that there is a pressing need for follow-up experiments to address this important question. The rate of amino acids synthesized, denoted by MA, is proportional to the deposited energy flux (Kobayashi et al. 1995). Using the G-values provided in Kobayashi et al. (1990) and Miyakawa et al. (2002b), we obtain the following phenomenological relation MA = 107 kg/yr (cid:18) ΦE 0.1 kJ m−2 yr−1(cid:19) , (7) for Earth-sized planets, where we have substituted the characteristic amino acid molar mass of 0.1 kg/mol. The above formula follows from multiplying the energy flux with the efficiency of amino acid synthesis. This value is comparable to the yields of organic molecules from other energy sources as seen from Fig. 3 of Deamer (1997). However, it should be noted that (7) deals solely with the synthesis of amino acids, whereas the latter (Deamer 1997) depicted the estimates for all organic compounds. In a similar fashion, the amount of nucleobases produced can be evaluated accordingly. We end up with ΦE 0.1 kJ m−2 yr−1(cid:19) , (8) MN = 104 kg/yr (cid:18) MN denotes the rate of nucleobases synthesized, where and we have used the fact that the typical molar mass of nucleobases is 0.1 kg/mol. As a point of reference, let us consider the ex- ogenous delivery of nucleobases and amino acids by meteorites. intact or- ganics from Chyba & Sagan (1992) along with data from carbonaceous chondrites (Kvenvolden et al. 1970; Cronin & Pizzarello 1983; Pizzarello & Shock 2017), MA ∼ 300 kg/yr and MN ∼ 2 kg/yr we arrive at (Miyakawa et al. 2002b). Thus, provided that the con- stituent gases are available in sufficient amounts, prebi- otic synthesis of amino acids and nucleobases by SEPs Using the delivery rate of 8 could have been approximately four orders of magni- tude higher than delivery by meteorites; this follows from comparing the above values for meteorites with (7) and (8). For weakly reducing atmospheres we find that the yield of amino acids via electrical discharges is ∼ 5 × 107 kg/yr using the data from Stribling & Miller (1987) and Miller (1998). A photochemical model was em- ployed by Tian et al. (2011) to compute the surface de- position rates of HCN for different concentrations of methane, evaluated at different levels of carbon diox- ide. Prior to the advent of methanogens, it was con- cluded that the prebiotic deposition rate of HCN was ∼ 107 molecules cm−2 s−1. Upon converting this into kg/yr and using the conversion efficiency of HCN to amino acids (Stribling & Miller 1987), we find that the yield of amino acids would be ∼ 3 × 107 kg/yr. The values for electrical discharges and UV photochemistry are commensurate with the amount of amino acids that could be produced by means of SEP-mediated synthe- sis, as seen from (7). In light of the many uncertainties surrounding prebiotic pathways and the composition of early Earth/Mars atmospheres, we emphasize that all of the preceding estimates should be regarded as being heuristic. These organic compounds, especially nucleobases but also amino acids, will be deposited at very low con- centrations on the planetary surface (land and oceans) and subsequent prebiotic chemistry would face further challenges (Budin & Szostak 2010).3 In order for nu- cleotides to undergo rapid polymerization and yield nucleic acids, wet-dry cycles and thermal gradients are expected to play an important role on thermodynamic grounds via polymerase chain reactions (Kreysing et al. 2015; Ross & Deamer 2016).4 A wide range of pu- tative environments endowed with operational cycles (and gradients) have been identified on Earth, for e.g. intermountain valleys and beaches (Bywater & Conde-Frieboesk 2005; Adam 2007; Benner et al. 2012; Da Silva et al. 2015; Lingam & Loeb 2017d) to name a few. Most of these habitats also supply the requisite minerals (and nutrients) that can play an important role in abiogenesis by catalyzing hydrothermal pools, 3 The putative role of aerosols in facilitating abiogenesis merits consideration (Tuck 2002; Donaldson et al. 2004) in connection with the above limitation, since they function as non-equilibrium chemical reactors and can drive the concentration of reactants (Dobson et al. 2000; Stueken et al. 2013). 4 Alternatively, on a cold and wet ancient Mars (Fair´en 2010; Grott et al. 2011) or Earth (Zahnle et al. 2010), abiogenesis might have been facilitated through the concentration of prebiotic com- pounds by means of eutectic freezing (Miyakawa et al. 2002a; Bada 2004; Price 2007; Monnard & Szostak 2008). Ice and freeze- thaw cycles may have also played an important role in driving the assembly of RNA polymerase ribozymes (Trinks et al. 2005; Bartels-Rausch et al. 2012; Attwater et al. 2013; Mutschler et al. 2015). polymerization (Ferris et al. 1996; Hazen & Sverjensky 2010; Cleaves II et al. 2012) and enabling homochirality (Hazen & Sholl 2003; Lambert 2008). However, it remains quite ambiguous as to whether analogous environments and mechanisms could have been prevalent on Noachian Mars (Carr & Head 2010). Surface water, minerals, and (perhaps) oceans are known to have existed intermittently on ancient Mars (Baker 2001; Solomon et al. 2005; Tosca & Knoll 2009; Di Achille & Hynek 2010; Adcock et al. 2013; Ehlmann & Edwards 2014). Conversely, geological ex- plorations of Meridiani Planum by the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity suggest that the Martian paleoen- vironment was likely to have been acidic, arid and ox- idizing (Squyres & Knoll 2005; Hurowitz & McLennan 2007; Ehlmann et al. 2011), while the salinity, ionic strength and chaotropic activity were potentially higher than the tolerance levels of current terrestrial or- ganisms (Tosca et al. 2008; Ball & Hallsworth 2015; Fox-Powell et al. 2016). These factors may have collec- tively posed difficulties for subsequent prebiotic chemi- cal reactions and abiogenesis to occur on ancient Mars (Knoll et al. 2005), although the environmental con- ditions at the Endeavour and Gale craters during the Noachian and/or Hesperian eras were possibly more fa- vorable for the emergence of life (Arvidson et al. 2014; Hurowitz et al. 2017). 3.3. Other implications of SEPs Previously, we have outlined how SEPs may provide a direct energy source for prebiotic synthesis. However, there are other avenues by which they can indirectly contribute to the latter as well. Physical mechanisms have been proposed wherein rel- ativistic runaway electron avalanches (RREAs) associ- ated with the formation of cosmic ray secondaries may lead to the initiation of lightning (Gurevich et al. 1992). The basic principle behind RREAs is that runaway electrons can undergo Møller scattering and give rise to other free electrons which also exceed the runaway threshold, thereby giving rise to a cascade. However, in order to trigger RREAs, "seed" particles with suf- ficient energy are required. It has been hypothesized that these seed particles were primarily contributed by cosmic ray secondaries (Gurevich et al. 1999). As SEPs can reach energies of a few GeV, it seems plausible that they could also serve as the seed particles for RREAs. There exists some recent observational evidence in this regard favoring positive correlations between elevated levels of SEPs (and solar activity) and lightning rates (Siingh et al. 2011; Scott et al. 2014). If this conjecture were valid, higher stellar activity would lead to enhanced lightning activity on (exo)planets (Hodos´an et al. 2016). The relativistic runaway breakdown theory predicts that the flux of runaway electrons ΦRE is linearly pro- portional to the flux of energetic seed particles ΦN (Dwyer & Uman 2014), and the latter is given by (5). The SEP number flux reaching the surface was prob- ably comparable to the Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) flux (Sanuki et al. 2000). If this were correct, solar proton events on ancient Mars (and Earth) may have contributed significantly to ΦRE implying that SEPs, and therefore flares, could have played an important role in the initiation of lightning on these planets. The relevance of electrical discharges for prebiotic chem- istry has been comprehensively studied (Miller 1953; Miller & Urey 1959; Borucki & Chameides 1984; Bada 2013; McCollom 2013), especially in the context of ni- trogen fixation; the latter's corresponding budget for an- cient Mars is predicted to have been similar to that of early Earth (Segura & Navarro-Gonz´alez 2005). From Fig. 2, the higher latitudes and night-side are characterized by slightly increased SEP energy fluxes at the surface for both current and ancient Mars. Since MA,N ∝ φE follows upon combining (1), (7) and (8), the synthesis of organic compounds could be higher at the above regions (up to a factor of ∼ 2 for current Mars). Thus, the possibility that favorable conditions for abiogenesis existed at higher latitudes on ancient Mars, Earth and other exoplanets may merit consider- ation (Jakosky et al. 2003), although it might be coun- terbalanced by the decline in reaction rates at relatively lower temperatures (Lingam & Loeb 2017e). Hitherto, we have discussed the positive implica- tions of SEPs, but we wish to reiterate that they can also be detrimental to life in surface environ- ments. The production of hydrogen and nitrogen oxides by SEPs rapidly depletes the ozone layer (Solomon 1999; L´opez-Puertas et al. 2005), thereby enabling harmful UV-B and UV-C radiation to reach the sur- face and potentially triggering biological extinctions (Melott & Thomas 2011; Lingam & Loeb 2017a). SEPs could also trigger the formation of secondary energetic particles, and lead to high radiation doses, especially on planets in the HZ of low-mass stars, which can prove to be detrimental to certain complex lifeforms on the sur- face (Atri 2017; Tilley et al. 2017). On the other hand, surficial organisms may adapt to such high-radiation en- vironments by means of ultraviolet screening compounds (Cockell & Knowland 1999). Furthermore, habitats in the deep biosphere or the oceans (Cleaves & Miller 1998) should be well-suited for protecting biota from ionizing radiation. In addition, extreme space weather events also en- hance atmospheric loss due to erosion by the so- lar/stellar wind (Dong et al. 2014, 2015a,b, 2017a, 2018; Jakosky et al. 2015; Ma et al. 2017). if the atmosphere is altogether depleted in . O(100) Myr (Dong et al. 2017b; Lingam & Loeb 2017e), there might not be sufficient time for life to originate and evolve (Lingam & Loeb 2017f,b); see Spiegel & Turner (2012) for a detailed Bayesian discussion of the constraints on the characteristic timescale for abiogenesis. In fact, 9 3.4. Implications of SEPs for exoplanets Let us now turn our attention to exoplanets in the HZ of other stars. We will focus primarily on M-dwarfs, as they are numerous in our Galaxy and detecting exoplan- ets around them is comparatively easier. Using the inverse-square scaling of SEP fluence (Feynman et al. 1993) with orbital distance a, we have φN ,E ∝ a−2 and the available empirical evidence indi- cates that this approximation may be reasonably valid for exoplanets in the HZ of M-dwarfs (Youngblood et al. 2017). Assuming that the atmospheric properties are akin to that of ancient Mars, we obtain ΦE = 50 f (cid:18) N 1 day−1(cid:19)(cid:16) −2 a 0.05 AU(cid:17) kJ m−2 yr−1, (9) and the last factor on the RHS accounts for the closer star-planet distance. We have retained the same nor- malization factor for N given that M-dwarf exoplanets are impacted by . 5 events per day (Kay et al. 2016). Similarly, we find that the number flux scales as ΦN = 7.3 × 106 f (cid:18) N 1 day−1(cid:19)(cid:16) a 0.05 AU(cid:17) −2 cm−2 s−1. (10) From (9) and (10), we see that the energy and number fluxes for exoplanets in the HZ of low-mass M-dwarfs are likely to be ∼ 100 − 1000 times higher than that of ancient Mars (or Earth). In turn, this has a number of consequences delineated below. • The energy flux is expected to be higher than the corresponding values for most other sources on early Earth, with the exception of UV radiation. It can, for instance, exceed the energy fluxes for shock impacts and radioactivity. • The number flux ΦN is likely to be higher than that of GCRs by several orders of magnitude. In turn, SEPs could prove to be a fairly major player in the initiation of lightning. • From (7) and (8), we see that MA,N ∝ ΦE. Hence, SEPs might serve as the most significant mechanism for the synthesis of amino acids and RNA/DNA nucleobases on exoplanets around M- dwarfs; we find that ∼ 106 − 107 kg/yr of nucle- obases might be produced via SEPs and this value is comparable to, or slightly higher than, the up- per bound of ∼ 106 kg/yr estimated from Table 1 of Nava-Sedeno et al. (2016). • The above point is rendered even more impor- tant by the fact that UV-mediated prebiotic path- ways are potentially inefficient on M-dwarf ex- oplanets, owing to the lower bioactive UV flu- ence (by a factor of ∼ 1000) reaching the surface (Buccino et al. 2007; Rugheimer et al. 2015). It is, 10 however, quite possible that flares may ameliorate this UV deficiency to some degree (Smith et al. 2004; Buccino et al. 2007; Ranjan et al. 2017a). • Since ΦE is proportional to N , as seen from (9), it could imply that stars with higher flare activ- ity are more conducive to prebiotic synthesis via SEPs (and even UV radiation). However, the same factors can also prove to be detrimental to the sus- tenance of complex biospheres (Dartnell 2011). Most of the above conclusions concerning M-dwarf ex- oplanets are also likely to be applicable to planets in the HZ of K-dwarfs, although the respective estimates should be lowered by 1-2 orders of magnitude. 4. CONCLUSIONS We carried out numerical simulations of ancient (and current) Mars to estimate the energy flux of SEPs (specifically protons) impacting the planetary surface and demonstrated that it is definitively lower than the contributions from other well-known energy sources like UV radiation and lightning. We also proved that energy deposition of SEPs on the surface displays a distinctive asymmetry with respect to both latitude and longitude. We employed the energy flux of SEPs incident upon the surface of ancient Mars to arrive at certain notewor- thy conclusions. By drawing upon detailed experimen- tal evidence, we hypothesized that a wide range of pre- biotic molecules, such as RNA/DNA nucleobases, aro- matic compounds and amino acids, could be synthesized through irradiation by energetic protons. In particular, the estimated maximum yields of proteinogenic amino acids (∼ 107 kg/yr) and nucleobases (∼ 104 kg/yr) - the building blocks of proteins and RNA/DNA respec- tively - were potentially comparable to, or even orders of magnitude higher than, some of the widely explored pathways like electrical discharges and exogenous deliv- ery by meteorites. We also suggested that SEPs may have played an important indirect role in prebiotic syn- thesis by initiating electrical discharges. Subsequently, we generalized our analysis to encom- pass exoplanets with Mars-like atmospheres around K- and M-dwarfs. We conjectured that SEPs are perhaps an important factor in synthesizing organic compounds on exoplanets orbiting M-dwarfs, and that they might mitigate the paucity of bioactive UV radiation (and UV- mediated prebiotic chemistry). Hence, from the specific viewpoint of prebiotic chemistry mediated by SEPs, it is tempting to conclude that these exoplanets are more conducive to abiogenesis.5 However, in light of the many uncertainties and mul- tiple interlinked factors involved concerning the ori- gin of life, all of the above statements should be re- garded with due caution. Detailed experimental and numerical follow-up studies based on the irradiation of gaseous mixtures resembling Noachian and M-dwarf (exo)planetary environments with MeV-GeV protons, in conjunction with remote sensing and in situ searches for organic molecules on Mars (Benner et al. 2000; ten Kate 2010; Vago et al. 2017),6 are necessary in order to fully assess the veracity of our results. Nevertheless, it seems plausible that SEPs might exert a profound influence (positive and/or negative) on the origin and evolution of life on habitable planets and moons (Heller et al. 2014), both within and outside of our solar system. The authors are very grateful to Stephen Bougher for generously providing access to the M-GITM model, and acknowledge valuable discussions with Andrew Knoll, Janet Luhmann, Michael Summers, Lei Dai, Takuya Shibayama and David Pawlowski. The detailed and insightful report furnished by the referee is also much appreciated. ML and AL were partly supported by grants from the Breakthrough Prize Foundation for the Starshot Initiative and Harvard University's Faculty of Arts and Sciences, and by the Institute for Theory and Computation (ITC) at Harvard University. CD was sup- ported by the NASA Living With a Star Jack Eddy Postdoctoral Fellowship Program, administered by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. XF and BMJ acknowledge support from NASA's MAVEN mission. Resources for this work were provided by the NASA High-End Computing (HEC) Program through the NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) Division at Ames Research Center. REFERENCES 5 Ironically, many of these characteristics are also possibly dele- terious to the emergence and sustenance of complex surface-based biospheres on Mars (Dartnell et al. 2007; Pavlov et al. 2012) and Mars-like exoplanets in the HZ of M-dwarfs (Griessmeier et al. 2005; Tabataba-Vakili et al. 2016; Tilley et al. 2017). 6 In this context, it could be necessary to take into account the oxidizing agents (e.g. perchlorate ions) incorporated into the Martian regolith (Lasne et al. 2016), ostensibly resulting in an oxidant extinction depth of . 5 m (Lammer et al. 2003). Adam, Z. 2007, Astrobiology, 7, 852 Adcock, C. T., Hausrath, E. M., & Forster, P. M. 2013, Nat. Geosci., 6, 824 Airapetian, V. S., Glocer, A., Gronoff, G., H´ebrard, E., & Danchi, W. 2016, Nat. Geosci., 9, 452 Arndt, N. T., & Nisbet, E. G. 2012, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 40, 521 Arvidson, R. E., Squyres, S. W., Bell, J. F., et al. 2014, Science, 343, 1248097 11 Atri, D. 2017, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett., 465, L34 Attwater, J., Wochner, A., & Holliger, P. 2013, Nat. Chem., Cockell, C. S., & Knowland, J. 1999, Biol. Rev., 74, 311 Comisso, L., Lingam, M., Huang, Y.-M., & Bhattacharjee, 5, 1011 Bada, J. L. 2004, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 226, 1 -. 2013, Chem. Soc. Rev., 42, 2186 Baker, V. R. 2001, Nature, 412, 228 Ball, P., & Hallsworth, J. E. 2015, Phys. Chem. Chem. A. 2016, Phys. Plasmas, 23, 100702 Cooper, J. F., Christian, E. R., Richardson, J. D., & Wang, C. 2003, Earth Moon and Planets, 92, 261 Cronin, J. R., & Pizzarello, S. 1983, Adv. Space Res., 3, 5 Crosby, N. B., Aschwanden, M. J., & Dennis, B. R. 1993, Phys., 17, 8297 Sol. Phys., 143, 275 Bartels-Rausch, T., Bergeron, V., Cartwright, J. H. E., Crutzen, P. J., Isaksen, I. S. A., & Reid, G. C. 1975, et al. 2012, Rev. Mod. Phys., 84, 885 Science, 189, 457 Benner, S. A., Devine, K. G., Matveeva, L. N., & Powell, Da Silva, L., Maurel, M.-C., & Deamer, D. 2015, J. Mol. D. H. 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 2425 Evol., 80, 86 Benner, S. A., & Kim, H.-J. 2015, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 9606, Instruments, Methods, and Missions for Astrobiology XVII, 96060C Dartnell, L. R. 2011, Astrobiology, 11, 551 Dartnell, L. R., Desorgher, L., Ward, J. M., & Coates, A. J. 2007, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L02207 Benner, S. A., Kim, H.-J., & Carrigan, M. A. 2012, Acc. Davis, W. L., & McKay, C. P. 1996, Orig. Life Evol. Chem. Res., 45, 2025 Biosph., 26, 61 Benz, A. O. 2017, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 14, 2 Berger, M. J., Coursey, J. S., Zucker, M. A., & Chang, J. 2011, Stopping-power and range tables for electrons, protons, and helium ions, Tech. rep., NISTIR 4999, ASTAR Program, NIST Physics Laboratory. Deamer, D., & Weber, A. L. 2010, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2, a004929 Deamer, D. W. 1997, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 61, 239 Deng, Y., Richmond, A. D., Ridley, A. J., & Liu, H.-L. 2008, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L01104 http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/star/index.cfm Desai, M., & Giacalone, J. 2016, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 13, Boesswetter, A., Lammer, H., Kulikov, Y., Motschmann, 3 U., & Simon, S. 2010, Planet. Space Sci., 58, 2031 Borucki, W. J., & Chameides, W. L. 1984, Rev. Geophys., Di Achille, G., & Hynek, B. M. 2010, Nat. Geosci., 3, 459 Dobson, C. M., Ellison, G. B., Tuck, A. F., & Vaida, V. 22, 363 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 11864 Bougher, S. W., Bell, J. M., Murphy, J. R., Donaldson, D. J., Tervahattu, H., Tuck, A. F., & Vaida, V. Lopez-Valverde, M. A., & Withers, P. G. 2006, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L02203 2004, Orig. Life Evol. Biosph., 34, 57 Dong, C., Bougher, S. W., Ma, Y., et al. 2014, Geophys. Bougher, S. W., Pawlowski, D., Bell, J. M., et al. 2015, J. Res. Lett., 41, 2708 Geophys. Res. E, 120, 311 Dong, C., Huang, Z., Lingam, M., et al. 2017a, Astrophys. Buccino, A. P., Lemarchand, G. A., & Mauas, P. J. D. J. Lett., 847, L4 2007, Icarus, 192, 582 Dong, C., Jin, M., Lingam, M., et al. 2018, Proc. Natl. Budin, I., & Szostak, J. W. 2010, Annu. Rev. Biophys., 39, Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 260 245 Dong, C., Lingam, M., Ma, Y., & Cohen, O. 2017b, Bywater, R. P., & Conde-Frieboesk, K. 2005, Astrobiology, Astrophys. J. Lett., 837, L26 5, 568 Dong, C., Bougher, S. W., Ma, Y., et al. 2015a, J. Geophys. Candelaresi, S., Hillier, A., Maehara, H., Brandenburg, A., Res. A, 120, 7857 & Shibata, K. 2014, Astrophys. J., 792, 67 Dong, C., Ma, Y., Bougher, S. W., et al. 2015b, Geophys. Canfield, D. E., Glazer, A. N., & Falkowski, P. G. 2010, Res. Lett., 42, 9103 Science, 330, 192 Carr, M. H., & Head, J. W. 2010, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Dwyer, J. R., & Uman, M. A. 2014, Phys. Rep., 534, 147 Ehlmann, B. L., & Edwards, C. S. 2014, Annu. Rev. Earth 294, 185 Planet. Sci., 42, 291 Chyba, C., & Sagan, C. 1992, Nature, 355, 125 Cleaves, H. J., & Miller, S. L. 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Ehlmann, B. L., Mustard, J. F., Murchie, S. L., et al. 2011, Nature, 479, 53 USA, 95, 7260 Ehrenfreund, P., Rasmussen, S., Cleaves, J., & Chen, L. Cleaves II, H. J., Scott, A. M., Hill, F. C., et al. 2012, 2006, Astrobiology, 6, 490 Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 5502 Ehrenfreund, P., Irvine, W., Becker, L., et al. 2002, Rep. Cockell, C. S. 2014, Astrobiology, 14, 182 Prog. Phys., 65, 1427 12 Emslie, A. G., Dennis, B. R., Shih, A. Y., et al. 2012, Hurowitz, J. A., & McLennan, S. M. 2007, Earth Planet. Astrophys. J., 759, 71 Sci. Lett., 260, 432 Fair´en, A. G. 2010, Icarus, 208, 165 Fang, X., Bougher, S. W., Johnson, R. E., et al. 2013a, Hurowitz, J. A., Grotzinger, J. P., Fischer, W. W., et al. 2017, Science, 356, eaah6849 Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1922 Jackman, C. H., Frederick, J. E., & Stolarski, R. S. 1980, J. Fang, X., Liemohn, M. W., Kozyra, J. U., & Solomon, S. C. Geophys. Res., 85, 7495 2004, J. Geophys. Res. A, 109, A04309 Jakosky, B. M., Nealson, K. H., Bakermans, C., Ley, R. E., Fang, X., Lummerzheim, D., & Jackman, C. H. 2013b, J. & Mellon, M. T. 2003, Astrobiology, 3, 343 Geophys. Res. A, 118, 5369 Farquhar, J., Savarino, J., Jackson, T. L., & Thiemens, Jakosky, B. M., & Phillips, R. J. 2001, Nature, 412, 237 Jakosky, B. M., & Shock, E. L. 1998, J. Geophys. Res., 103, M. H. 2000, Nature, 404, 50 19359 Fassett, C. I., & Head, J. W. 2011, Icarus, 211, 1204 Ferris, J. P., & Hagan, W. J. 1984, Tetrahedron, 40, 1093 Ferris, J. P., Hill, A. R., Liu, R., & Orgel, L. E. 1996, Nature, 381, 59 Feulner, G. 2012, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG2006 Feynman, J., Spitale, G., Wang, J., & Gabriel, S. 1993, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 13281 Jakosky, B. M., Grebowsky, J. M., Luhmann, J. G., et al. 2015, Science, 350, 0210 Jolitz, R. D., Dong, C. F., Lee, C. O., et al. 2017, J. Geophys. Res. A, 122, 5653 Joyce, G. F. 2002, Nature, 418, 214 Kasting, J. F. 2010, Nature, 464, 687 Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P., & Reynolds, R. T. 1993, Formisano, V., Atreya, S., Encrenaz, T., Ignatiev, N., & Icarus, 101, 108 Giuranna, M. 2004, Science, 306, 1758 Kay, C., Opher, M., & Kornbleuth, M. 2016, Astrophys. J., Fox-Powell, M. G., Hallsworth, J. E., Cousins, C. R., & 826, 195 Cockell, C. S. 2016, Astrobiology, 16, 427 Knoll, A. H., Carr, M., Clark, B., et al. 2005, Earth Planet. Gollihar, J., Levy, M., & Ellington, A. D. 2014, Science, Sci. Lett., 240, 179 343, 259 Kobayashi, K., Kaneko, T., Saito, T., & Oshima, T. 1998, Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S., & Akiyama, S. 2007, J. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph., 28, 155 Geophys. Res. A, 112, A06112 Kobayashi, K., Kaneko, T., Tsuchiya, M., et al. 1995, Adv. Griessmeier, J.-M., Stadelmann, A., Motschmann, U., et al. Space Res., 15, 127 2005, Astrobiology, 5, 587 Kobayashi, K., Tsuchiya, M., Oshima, T., & Yanagawa, H. Grott, M., Morschhauser, A., Breuer, D., & Hauber, E. 1990, Orig. Life Evol. Biosph., 20, 99 2011, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 308, 391 Kobayashi, K., Masuda, H., Ushio, K.-i., et al. 2001, Adv. Gudel, M. 2007, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 4, 3 Gurevich, A. V., Milikh, G. M., & Roussel-Dupre, R. 1992, Space Res., 27, 207 Koonin, E. V., & Novozhilov, A. S. 2009, IUBMB life, 61, Phys. Lett. A, 165, 463 99 Gurevich, A. V., Zybin, K. P., & Roussel-Dupre, R. A. Kreysing, M., Keil, L., Lanzmich, S., & Braun, D. 2015, 1999, Phys. Lett. A, 254, 79 Nat. Chem., 7, 203 Halevy, I., & Head, III, J. W. 2014, Nat. Geosci., 7, 865 Halevy, I., Zuber, M. T., & Schrag, D. P. 2007, Science, 318, 1903 Hannah, I. G., Hudson, H. S., Battaglia, M., et al. 2011, Kvenvolden, K., Lawless, J., Pering, K., et al. 1970, Nature, 228, 923 Lambert, J.-F. 2008, Orig. Life Evol. Biosph., 38, 211 Lammer, H., Lichtenegger, H. I. M., Kolb, C., et al. 2003, Space Sci. Rev., 159, 263 Icarus, 165, 9 Hassler, D. M., Zeitlin, C., Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., Lasne, J., Noblet, A., Szopa, C., et al. 2016, Astrobiology, et al. 2014, Science, 343, 1244797 16, 977 Hazen, R. M., & Sholl, D. S. 2003, Nat. Mater., 2, 367 Hazen, R. M., & Sverjensky, D. A. 2010, Cold Spring Harb. Lillis, R. J., Frey, H. V., & Manga, M. 2008, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L14203 Perspect. Biol., 2, a002162 Lillis, R. J., Robbins, S., Manga, M., Halekas, J. S., & Frey, Heller, R., Williams, D., Kipping, D., et al. 2014, H. V. 2013, J. Geophys. Res. E, 118, 1488 Astrobiology, 14, 798 Higgs, P. G., & Pudritz, R. E. 2009, Astrobiology, 9, 483 Hodos´an, G., Helling, C., Asensio-Torres, R., Vorgul, I., & Lingam, M., & Loeb, A. 2017a, Astrophys. J., 848, 41 -. 2017b, submitted to J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., arXiv:1710.11134 Rimmer, P. B. 2016, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 461, 3927 -. 2017c, submitted to Int. J. Astrobiol., arXiv:1711.09908 13 -. 2017d, Astrobiology, arXiv:1707.04594 -. 2017e, Int. J. Astrobiol., arXiv:1707.02996 -. 2017f, Astrophys. J. Lett., 846, L21 L´opez-Puertas, M., Funke, B., Gil-L´opez, S., et al. 2005, J. Geophys. Res. A, 110, A09S43 Luisi, P. L. 2016, The Emergence of Life: From Chemical Origins to Synthetic Biology (Cambridge Univ. Press) Lummerzheim, D., Rees, M. H., & Anderson, H. R. 1989, Planet. Space Sci., 37, 109 Ma, Y. J., Russell, C. T., Fang, X., et al. 2017, J. Geophys. Res. A, 122, 1714 Orgel, L. E. 2004, Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 39, 99 Owen, T. 1992, in Mars, ed. H. H. Kieffer, B. M. Jakosky, C. W. Snyder, & M. S. Matthews (Univ. of Arizona Press), 818–834 Pascal, R. 2012, J. Sys. Chem., 3, 3 Patel, B. H., Percivalle, C., Ritson, D. J., Duffy, C. D., & Sutherland, J. D. 2015, Nat. Chem., 7, 301 Pavlov, A. A., Vasilyev, G., Ostryakov, V. M., Pavlov, A. K., & Mahaffy, P. 2012, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L13202 Pearce, B. K. D., & Pudritz, R. E. 2016, Astrobiology, 16, Maehara, H., Shibayama, T., Notsu, Y., et al. 2015, Earth, 853 Planets, and Space, 67, 59 Pizzarello, S., & Shock, E. 2017, Orig. Life Evol. Biosph., Maehara, H., Shibayama, T., Notsu, S., et al. 2012, Nature, 47, 249 485, 478 Maher, K. A., & Stevenson, D. J. 1988, Nature, 331, 612 Martin, W., Baross, J., Kelley, D., & Russell, M. J. 2008, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 6, 805 McCollom, T. M. 2013, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 41, 207 McKay, C. P. 1997, Orig. Life Evol. Biosph., 27, 263 -. 2010, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2, a003509 Mekhaldi, F., Muscheler, R., Adolphi, F., et al. 2015, Nat. Commun., 6, 8611 Melott, A. L., & Thomas, B. C. 2011, Astrobiology, 11, 343 Mewaldt, R. A. 2006, Space Sci. Rev., 124, 303 Mewaldt, R. A., Looper, M. D., Cohen, C. M. S., et al. Price, P. B. 2007, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 59, 217 Priest, E. 2014, Magnetohydrodynamics of the Sun (Cambridge Univ. Press) Ranjan, S., & Sasselov, D. D. 2017, Astrobiology, 17, 169 Ranjan, S., Wordsworth, R., & Sasselov, D. D. 2017a, Astrophys. J., 843, 110 -. 2017b, Astrobiology, 17, 687 Rapf, R. J., & Vaida, V. 2016, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 20067 Reames, D. V. 2013, Space Sci. Rev., 175, 53 Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., Gudel, M., & Audard, M. 2005, Astrophys. J., 622, 680 Ridley, A. J., Deng, Y., & T´oth, G. 2006, J. Atmos. 2012, Space Sci. Rev., 171, 97 Sol.-Terr. Phys., 68, 839 Mileikowsky, C., Cucinotta, F. A., Wilson, J. W., et al. 2000, Icarus, 145, 391 Ross, D. S., & Deamer, D. 2016, Life, 6, 28 Rugheimer, S., Segura, A., Kaltenegger, L., & Sasselov, D. Miller, S. L. 1953, Science, 117, 528 -. 1998, in The Molecular Origins of Life, ed. A. Brack 2015, Astrophys. J., 806, 137 Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Briones, C., & de la Escosura, A. 2014, (Cambridge Univ. Press), 59–85 Chem. Rev., 114, 285 Miller, S. L., & Urey, H. C. 1959, Science, 130, 245 Miyakawa, S., Cleaves, H. J., & Miller, S. L. 2002a, Orig. Russell, M. J., Barge, L. M., Bhartia, R., et al. 2014, Astrobiology, 14, 308 Life Evol. Biosph., 32, 209 Miyakawa, S., Yamanashi, H., Kobayashi, K., Cleaves, H. J., & Miller, S. L. 2002b, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 14628 Sagan, C., & Mullen, G. 1972, Science, 177, 52 Sanuki, T., Motoki, M., Matsumoto, H., et al. 2000, Astrophys. J., 545, 1135 Schrijver, C. J., Beer, J., Baltensperger, U., et al. 2012, J. Monnard, P.-A., & Szostak, J. W. 2008, J. Inorg. Biochem., Geophys. Res. A, 117, A08103 102, 1104 Schubert, G., Russell, C. T., & Moore, W. B. 2000, Nature, Morowitz, H., & Smith, E. 2007, Complexity, 13, 51 Mutschler, H., Wochner, A., & Holliger, P. 2015, Nat. 408, 666 Schulze-Makuch, D., Fair´en, A. G., & Davila, A. F. 2008, Chem., 7, 502 Int. J. Astrobiol., 7, 117 Nava-Sedeno, J. M., Ortiz-Cervantes, A., Segura, A., & Domagal-Goldman, S. D. 2016, Astrobiology, 16, 744 Newman, M. E. J. 2005, Contemp. Phys., 46, 323 Nisbet, E. G., & Sleep, N. H. 2001, Nature, 409, 1083 Odert, P., Leitzinger, M., Hanslmeier, A., & Lammer, H. Scott, C. J., Harrison, R. G., Owens, M. J., Lockwood, M., & Barnard, L. 2014, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 055004 Segura, A., & Navarro-Gonz´alez, R. 2005, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L05203 Shibata, K., Isobe, H., Hillier, A., et al. 2013, Publ. Astron. 2017, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 472, 876 Soc. Jpn, 65, 49 14 Shibayama, T., Maehara, H., Notsu, S., et al. 2013, Tilley, M. A., Segura, A., Meadows, V. S., Hawley, S., & Astrophys. J. Suppl., 209, 5 Shields, A. L., Ballard, S., & Johnson, J. A. 2016, Phys. Davenport, J. 2017, submitted to Astrobiology, arXiv:1711.08484 Rep., 663, 1 Tosca, N. J., & Knoll, A. H. 2009, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Siingh, D., Singh, R. P., Singh, A. K., et al. 2011, Surveys 286, 379 in Geophysics, 32, 659 Tosca, N. J., Knoll, A. H., & McLennan, S. M. 2008, Smith, D. S., Scalo, J., & Wheeler, J. C. 2004, Orig. Life Science, 320, 1204 Evol. Biosph., 34, 513 Solomon, S. 1999, Rev. Geophys., 37, 275 Solomon, S. C., Aharonson, O., Aurnou, J. M., et al. 2005, Science, 307, 1214 Spiegel, D. S., & Turner, E. L. 2012, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 395 Squyres, S. W., & Knoll, A. H. 2005, Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett., 240, 1 Trinks, H., Schroder, W., & Biebricher, C. K. 2005, Orig. Life Evol. Biosph., 35, 429 Tuck, A. 2002, Surv. Geophys, 23, 379 Vago, J. L., Westall, F., Pasteur Instrument Team, et al. 2017, Astrobiology, 17, 471 Walker, S. I. 2017, Rep. Prog. Phys., 80, 092601 Webb, D. F., & Howard, T. A. 2012, Living Rev. Sol. Stribling, R., & Miller, S. L. 1987, Orig. Life Evol. Biosph., Phys., 9, 3 17, 261 Stueken, E. E., Anderson, R. E., Bowman, J. S., et al. 2013, Weber, A. L., & Miller, S. L. 1981, J. Mol. Evol., 17, 273 Webster, C. R., Mahaffy, P. R., Atreya, S. K., et al. 2015, Geobiology, 11, 101 Science, 347, 415 Summers, M. E., Lieb, B. J., Chapman, E., & Yung, Y. L. Westall, F., Loizeau, D., Foucher, F., et al. 2013, 2002, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 24.1 Astrobiology, 13, 887 Sutherland, J. D. 2016, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 55, 104 -. 2017, Nat. Rev. Chem., 1, 0012 Tabataba-Vakili, F., Grenfell, J. L., Griessmeier, J.-M., & Rauer, H. 2016, Astron. Astrophys., 585, A96 Takahashi, T., Mizuno, Y., & Shibata, K. 2016, Astrophys. J. Lett., 833, L8 ten Kate, I. L. 2010, Astrobiology, 10, 589 Tian, F., Kasting, J. F., & Solomon, S. C. 2009, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L02205 Tian, F., Kasting, J. F., & Zahnle, K. 2011, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 308, 417 Wordsworth, R. D. 2016, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 44, 381 Yashiro, S., Gopalswamy, N., Michalek, G., et al. 2004, J. Geophys. Res. A, 109, A07105 Youngblood, A., France, K., Parke Loyd, R. O., et al. 2017, Astrophys. J., 843, 31 Zahnle, K., Schaefer, L., & Fegley, B. 2010, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2, a004895 Zaia, D. A. M., Zaia, C. T. B. V., & de Santana, H. 2008, Orig. Life Evol. Biosph., 38, 469
1901.02383	1	1901	2019-01-08T16:03:35	The secondary transit of the hot Jupiter WASP-121b at 2 $\mu$m	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Ground-based observations of the secondary transit in the 2MASS K band are presented for the hot Jupiter WASP-121b. These are the first occultation observations of an extrasolar planet carried out with an instrument attached to a 1m-class telescope (SMARTS' 1.3 m). We find a highly significant transit depth of (0.228 +/- 0.023)%. Together with the Hubble Space Telescope near infrared emission spectrum, current data support more involved atmosphere models with species producing emission/absorption features, rather than simple smooth black body emission. Analysis of the time difference between the primary and secondary transits and the durations of these events yield an eccentricity of e=0.0207 +/- 0.0153, which is consistent with the earlier estimates of low/zero eccentricity, but with a smaller error. Together with the existing K-band data on other systems, WASP-121b lends further support to the lack of efficient heat transport between the day and night sides for nearly all Hot Jupiters.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy& Astrophysics manuscript no. wasp121v3aph January 9, 2019 c(cid:13) ESO 2019 9 1 0 2 n a J 8 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 3 8 3 2 0 . 1 0 9 1 : v i X r a The secondary transit of the hot Jupiter WASP-121b at 2 µm G´eza Kov´acs1 and Tam´as Kov´acs2 1 Konkoly Observatory of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1121 Konkoly Thege ut. 13-15, Hungary e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Theoretical Physics, Eotvos University, Budapest, 1117 P´azm´any P´eter s´et´any 1A Received September ?? 2018 / Accepted ?? 2018 ABSTRACT Ground-based observations of the secondary transit in the 2MASS K band are presented for the hot Jupiter WASP-121b. These are the first occultation observations of an extrasolar planet carried out with an instrument attached to a 1 m-class telescope (SMARTS' 1.3 m). We find a highly significant transit depth of (0.228±0.023)%. Together with the Hubble Space Telescope near infrared emission spectrum, current data support more involved atmosphere models with species producing emission/absorption features, rather than simple smooth black body emission. Analysis of the time difference between the primary and secondary transits and the durations of these events yield an eccentricity of e = 0.0207 ± 0.0153, which is consistent with the earlier estimates of low/zero eccentricity, but with a smaller error. Together with the existing K-band data on other systems, WASP-121b lends further support to the lack of efficient heat transport between the day and night sides for nearly all Hot Jupiters. Key words. Planets and satellites: atmospheres -- Methods: data analysis 1. Introduction When combined with other pieces of information (such as planet mass), the low thermal radiation of extrasolar planets is a di- rect evidence of their substellar nature. In addition to this inde- pendent verification, measuring the radiation spectrum yields a wealth of information on atmospheric structure and basic orbital parameters. Due to their low temperatures (relative to their host stars), the best chance of detection is obviously in the infrared. From the first detection, employing the mid-infrared instrument of the Spitzer Space Telescope by Deming et al. (2005), many systems have been observed not only by space-based, but also by ground-based instruments attached to 4-meter class telescopes. Here we report the multiple detection of the secondary transit1 of the Hot Jupiter (HJ) WASP-121b in the 2MASS K band by A Novel Dual Imaging CAMera (ANDICAM) attached to the 1.3 m telescope of the SMARTS Consortium2. The transiting extrasolar planetary system WASP-121 was discovered by Delrez et al. (2016) using the wide-field tele- scopes of the SuperWASP project (Pollacco et al. 2006, see also Anderson et al. 2018 for the latest update). The analysis of these and the subsequent spectroscopic followup observations revealed that WASP-121b is a very hot Jupiter, with a maxi- mum photospheric temperature above 3000 K. This is not sur- prising, since the planet orbits an F star rather close, with a pe- riod of 1.27 days. The close orbit, the extended planet's radius3 1 Throughout this papers, we use also the word 'occultation' for the event of secondary transit. 2 For additional details on the instrument, access images, raw and systematics corrected light curves, please visit http://www.astro.yale.edu/smarts/1.3m.html http://archive.noao.edu/search/query/ http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/ . of Rp = 1.87 RJ with standard mass of Mp = 1.18 MJ imply rather strong tidal dissipation, leading to Roche-lobe filling and then to a speedy disruption within some hundred million years, assuming a stellar tidal dissipation factor Qstar < 108 (see Delrez et al. 2016). In addition, the planet has probably experienced a strong dynamical interaction with some nearby third body, as can be inferred from the large projected spin-orbit angle of 258◦ ± 5◦ (see Delrez et al. 2016). Interestingly, secondary transits were observed multiple times by the same authors in the Sloan-z' band by the 60 cm TRAPPIST telescope -- to our knowledge, this is the first occultation detection from the ground by a telescope of this size. The significant detection of the occultation depth of a mere (0.060 ± 0.013)% resulted in the first direct estima- tion of the planet temperature. Important followup observations (both during the primary and secondary transits) have been made by Evans et al. (2016, 2017, 2018) by using the Hubble Space Telescope's Wide Field Camera 3 in the near infrared, Spitzer's IRAC detector at 3.6 µm and HST/STIS in the UV. These data indicate a weak H2O emission during occultation and absorp- tion during transit, implying temperature inversion due to some high-altitude absorber. In spite of the successful fit of the HST emission spectrum, and quite currently the transmission spec- trum observed by the same instrument, the authors caution for the non-uniqueness of the solution (e.g., type of absorber, pre- cision of the fit at different wavelengths, etc.). These issues are not unique to WASP-121b, they are also present in other very hot Jupiters (e.g., WASP-33b, Kepler-13Ab -- see Parmentier et al. 2018). In spite of the considerable progress made in the past ten years, there is a substantial lack of understanding the rela- tions between the physical parameters of the systems and the thermal properties of their planets (see the uniform analysis by Adams & Laughlin 2018 of 10 systems with full infrared phase curves). 3 The radius quoted here is the one that appears in the Abstract of the discovery paper. We use the radius based on the HST measurements of Evans et al. (2017) -- see Sect. 4. The purpose of this work is to add a flux value to the emis- sion spectrum of WASP-121b at a single waveband and thereby increase the number of constraints on future atmosphere mod- 1 Kovacs, G. & Kovacs, T.: The secondary transit of WASP-121b eling of the planet. Furthermore, timing estimates are presented to give more stringent limits on the orbital eccentricity, a valu- able parameter for the analysis of the dynamical history of the system. 2. Observations and the method of analysis Photometric observations in the 2MASS K and Cousins I bands (effective wavelengths of 2.2 µm and 0.8 µm, respectively) have been made by using the ANDICAM instrument in a beam- splitting mode, allowing simultaneous data acquisition in the two bands.4 On each night, the target was monitored continuously, by allowing ample amount of pre- and after-event time (permit- ted by the actual sky position) to reliably fix the out-of-transit (OOT) baseline for the event lasting almost for 3 hours. An ex- posure time of 15 -- 20 s was used, resulting in an overall cadence of 70 -- 500 s, due to the overheads, related to read-outs, vary- ing movements due to dithering and other data acquisition steps. The observing log with some associated parameters is given in Table 1. Table 1. List of secondary transit observations of WASP-121b in the near infrared. Date [UT] 02/26/2016 01/11/2017 01/25/2017 Tocc [HJD] Ttot [hours] 2457444.64855 2457764.65485 2457778.67903 4.86 6.13 6.64 Ntot 177 203 205 Notes: Tocc stands for the time of the center of occultation as estimated from the ephemeris given by Delrez et al. (2016) for the primary transit in their Table 4. Ttot and Ntot are the total observing time and data points gathered. For the K-band observations dithering was used to decrease the higher sensitivity against detector non-uniformity in the near infrared. We found this method useful, as we did not have a pri- ori information on pixel sensitivity. Admittedly, this method has also some risk, since by testing different parts of the CCD, we may bump into bad positions, leading to light curves of larger scatter associated with the particular dither position. All in all, we think that our strategy has proven to be useful and led to a higher quality result at the end. By stacking several images, we show the dither pattern in Fig. 1 for one of the nights. The number of dither positions changed from night to night, and their durations were also not the same. The image (that has already been corrected for flat field) spectacularly exhibits sequences of rings, reminiscent of the trace of some earlier drops of dew. In spite of their high vis- ibility, their effect has been proven to be less damaging for the data quality than the varying pixel sensitivity (that is consider- able more difficult to spot, because they lack the type of spatial correlation the rings have). In producing the photometric time series to be used in the derivation of the basic occultation parameters, we proceed as follows. First we compute simple relative fluxes at various, but fixed circular apertures from 10 to 20 pixel radii with an incre- ment of 2 pixels. After a lot of experimenting, and inspecting the 4 Unfortunately, the signal -- hampered by weather and instrumental limitations -- in the Cousins I band was too weak to yield any useful planet atmospheric constraint, so we decided not to deal with it. 2 WASP-121 (Feb 26, 2016) 500 400 n o i t i s o p l e x p i 300 200 100 0 0 100 200 pixel position 300 400 500 95000 90000 85000 s t n u o c 80000 75000 Fig. 1. Dithering pattern used during the near infrared observa- tions. The image shows the 2.4′ × 2.4′ FOV of the ANDICAM near infrared camera, attached to the 1.3 m telescope of the SMARTS Consortium. The target (WASP-121=2MASS 07102406-3905506) is in the middle, the comparison star 2MASS 07102364-3905561 is in the lower left corner. North is on the top West is on the left. Circles around the target and the comparison star show the aperture sizes used to estimate the star and background fluxes. #6 #6 X U L F 1.04 1.03 1.02 1.01 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.97 #13 #9 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 PHASE 0.60 0.65 Fig. 2. Simple photometric flux ratios ordered by the orbital pe- riod (pale dots). Some dithers are annotated to see the nightly trends (or the lack of them, i.e., #9). Dither #6 (gray dots) is plotted also after employing zero point shift and detrending by the position vector (black dots, see Sect. 2 for details). final product of the full detrending procedure to be described be- low, we find that the aperture with the pixel radius of 16 yields a light curve with the smallest scatter. All results presented in this paper refer to the above aperture size. By using the relative fluxes (target over comparison star flux, hereafter raw flux) and folding the data with the orbital period, we can examine if we can see some sign of an occultation event. The result is shown in Fig. 2. The pale dots show that the raw fluxes are very noisy, and the event with the expected depth of 0.1 -- 0.2% is hopelessly buried in the noise. We can find out the reason of this somewhat unexpected high level of noise by ex- amining the individual light curves (LCs) associated with the Kovacs, G. & Kovacs, T.: The secondary transit of WASP-121b various dither positions5. Indeed, we see from the highlighted LCs that there is a strong dependence on the dither position, leading to both zero point shifts and nightly trends. Therefore, (not entirely unexpectedly), we must employ some detrending method that is likely the cause of the trends and zero point shifts. The detrending step is vital and therefore quite common in the extraction of planetary signals in general, and, in particular, in the derivation of wavelength-dependent transit depths for the exquisite accuracy needed to estimate emission or transmission spectra (e.g., Stevenson et al. 2012; Kreidberg et al. 2015). It is well-known that ground-based instruments detect stel- lar light deformed by the multiplicative noise and systematics originating from the Earth's atmosphere and from the environ- ment/instrument. In addition, we also have an additive noise source, coming from the sky background F = F0 × Tatm × Tenv + Fbg , (1) where F is the detected, F0 is the true stellar flux. The trans- mission functions of the Earth's atmosphere and the instrument are denoted by Tatm and Tenv, respectively, whereas the back- ground flux by Fbg. In traditional photometric reductions the at- mospheric and instrumental effects are filtered out with the aid of comparison stars near the target, by using the assumption of the close similarity in the transmission functions for the target and its neighboring companions. However, when higher accu- racy is required, this method usually fails, because of the lack of complete equivalence between the transmission functions of the target and the comparison stars (and, for faint targets, there is also the issue of the presence of the additive background noise). Due to the lack of obvious exact solution of the problem (similarly to the methodology followed in other studies, e.g., Bakos et al. 2010, Delrez et al. 2016), we opt to an approximate one. Here we take the logarithm of the target to comparison star flux ratios F/F c, and fit the data with the linear combination of the presumed signal and certain external photometric parame- ters (e.g., position, PSF width). In addition, we treat each LC of the different dither positions individually, with particular zero points and trends (but with the same underlying signal). That is, we Least Square minimize the following expression D = M Nj Xj=1 Xi=1 wj" log Fj(i) F c j (i) − Ej(i)#2 , Ej(i) = a0,j + ax,jXj(i) + ay,jYj(i) + A log(Ftrap(i)) . (2) (3) Here all data are sorted by the orbital phase. We assume that there are M dither positions altogether with Nj data points at the j-th dither. Since our extensive tests showed that neither arbi- trary polynomial nor additional external parameters are needed to reach a high signal-to-noise ratio (S /N) detection, we use only the pixel position components (X, Y) of the target to cor- rect for instrumental effects. The stellar flux during the occulta- tion is approximated by a trapezoidal function Ftrap with fixed ingress/egress time, duration and transit center of 0.015, 0.120 and 2457764.65485 days, respectively, corresponding to those given by Delrez et al. (2016). The weights {w} are constant for the same dither index and proportional to the reciprocal of the variance of the residuals around the best-fitting trapezoidal. Since the solution is not known, the weights are iterated during the process of solution. At the end, the data are converted back to relative intensities, with an OOT normalization of 1.0 for the 5 Please note that all dither positions are counted and their indices increase toward more recent nights of observation. fitted trapezoidal. The error of the occultation depth is computed as follows σ(δocc) =  1 − Np N  −1/2  s14 N2 14 + soot N2 oot  1/2 , (4) where s14 and soot are sums of the squared residuals in the in- and out-of-transit phases, respectively. Akin to these are the number of data points N14 and Noot. The factor in front (with Np number of the parameters fitted to N total number of data points) is for the debiasing of the error due to the decrease of the degrees of freedom, because of parameter fitting. The S /N of the detection is the ratio of the average transit depth to the above error S /N = 1 σ(δocc) 1 N14 N14 Xi=1 Ftrap(i) . 3. Occultation parameters (5) First we fix all secondary transit parameters (but the occulta- tion depth) by assuming circular orbit and the validity of the pa- rameters derived for the primary transit by Delrez et al. (2016). Following the procedure described in Sect. 2, we compute the best fitting occultation depth under various conditions, concern- ing the number of points clipped and the dither LCs omitted. The result is shown in Table. 2. Except perhaps for the extreme choices of data trimming parameters (Ncut σ ), the occul- tation depth is relative stable. To avoid too sparsely populated dither LCs, and not to 'overtrim' the data, we opt for the case of Ncut σ = 4. The folded LC obtained in this dith way is shown in Fig. 3. The resulting secondary transit depth is 0.00228 ± 0.00023. = 10 and Ncut dith and Ncut Table 2. Occultation depths for WASP-121 in the 2MASS K band Ncut dith 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 15 15 15 15 Ncut σ ∞ 5 4 3 ∞ 5 4 3 ∞ 5 4 3 Npar 70 + 0 70 + 8 70 + 11 70 + 25 61 + 0 61 + 8 61 + 11 61 + 25 52 + 0 52 + 8 52 + 11 52 + 25 N 585 585 585 585 561 561 561 561 520 520 520 520 S /N 8.1 8.4 8.8 9.2 8.2 8.5 8.9 9.3 8.2 8.6 8.9 9.3 σfit 0.00272 0.00264 0.00264 0.00256 0.00275 0.00266 0.00266 0.00257 0.00281 0.00270 0.00270 0.00260 δocc 0.00212 0.00215 0.00224 0.00227 0.00217 0.00220 0.00228 0.00231 0.00231 0.00233 0.00243 0.00244 dith is the lower limit on the number of data points per dither position. σ is the number of standard deviations used in the clipping of the Notes: Ncut Ncut data points. Npar is the number of parameters fitted, plus the number of data points omitted (Np in Eq. 4 includes both of these). Items in the last two columns (unbiased estimates of the standard deviation of the residuals and occultation depth) refer to the OOT= 1 normalization as described in Sect. 2. To check the level of the systematics filtering, we compute the autocorrelation function (ACF) of the residuals after sub- tracting the best-fitting trapezoidal as shown in Fig. 3. In the units of the orbital period, the ACF is computed with steps of 0.00123 up to 0.115, i.e. close to the length of the full transit 3 1.01 X U L F 1.00 0.99 Kovacs, G. & Kovacs, T.: The secondary transit of WASP-121b SMARTS 2MASS K 0.02 0.01 c T ∆ 0 -0.01 -0.02 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 PHASE 0.60 0.65 0.1 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.12 t14 7.6e-06 7.5e-06 7.4e-06 7.3e-06 7.2e-06 7.1e-06 7e-06 6.9e-06 Fig. 3. Systematics-filtered folded flux ratios normalized to 1.0 in the out-of-transit part. Average fluxes (in 30 phase bins) are shown by blue dashes, the best fitting trapezoidal secondary tran- sit approximation is plotted by yellow continuous line. Fig. 5. Intensity plot for the unbiased estimate of the variance of the residuals between the data and the occultation model scanned in the parameter space of the displacement of the occultation center ∆Tc and the duration of the event t14. We employ iter- ative 4σ clipping to find the best solution for each parameter combination. 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.000 0.005 0.010 n o i t a l e r r o c d e z i l a m r o N 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 Shift [phase] Fig. 4. Blue dots: autocorrelation function (ACF) of the resid- uals of the trapezoidal fit to the final dataset shown in Fig. 3. Red dots: ACF of generated uncorrelated noise. Error bars are for the standard deviations of the the ACF values of the random datasets. The time lag is given in the units of the orbital period. The inset shows the immediate neighborhood of ACF at zero time shift (given in the units of the orbital period). TRAPPIST Sloan z' 0.02 0.01 c T ∆ 0 -0.01 -0.02 0.1 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.12 t14 1.024e-05 1.023e-05 1.022e-05 1.021e-05 1.02e-05 1.019e-05 1.018e-05 1.017e-05 Fig. 6. As in Fig. 5, but for the TRAPPIST data. The better con- trast (in spite of the larger residual scatter) of the best solution is likely accounted for by the more than ten times larger number of data points than for the SMARTS observations. event. As a sanity check, we also compute the ACF for many Gaussian white noise realizations. The result is shown in Fig. 4. We see that the residuals are almost uncorrelated. The basic cor- relation length is under ∼ 0.005 in the units of the orbital period. This value is less than one half of the ingress duration. It seems that the de-correlation method applied yields nearly white noise residuals, supporting the validity of the pure statistical error esti- mation given by Eq. 4. We also note that similar short-time-scale correlations are observable in other studies dealing with system- atics, in particular in the analysis of the HST data by Evans et al. (2017). Although the noise is rather high, the relative large number of data points led to a high-S /N detection. Therefore, it is tempt- ing to see if our assumption on the applicability of the primary transit parameters is really held, and if there is a chance to fur- ther constrain the eccentricity by the best-fitting occultation cen- ter and event duration. To this aim we map the quality of the fit as a function of ∆Tc (tested occultation center time minus the one calculated from the primary transit with the assumption of circular orbit) and t14 (occultation duration). In addition to our data, to examine further the issue of ec- centricity, the secondary transit data of Delrez et al. (2016) are also investigated. Since the observations were made in the Sloan z' band, the signal is considerably shallower than in the 2MASS K (Ks) band. Nevertheless, the number of data points (6260 flux measurements on seven nights) compensates for this, and yields a confident detection of S /N = 7.5, with δocc = 0.000697 ± 0.000081 and a residual standard deviation of 0.003190. This depth is larger by 0.000096 than the one derived by Delrez et al. (2016), but the difference is within 1σ, and could be ac- counted for by the lower number of detrending parameters used in our code. We found it satisfactory to use only the pixel coordi- nates, and avoid to correct with a polynomial and other parame- ters, since these do not yield an appreciable improvement in the quality of the fit, and, in addition, may lead to a depression of the occultation depth. 4 Kovacs, G. & Kovacs, T.: The secondary transit of WASP-121b tricity The (∆Tc, t14) maps are shown in Figs. 5 and 6 for the Ks and Sloan z' data, respectively. As expected, the topology of both maps confirms the rather small (if any) deviations from the pa- rameters predicted by the primary transit with the assumption of circular orbit. Furthermore, the Sloan z' data are more restric- tive than the Ks data, even though the S /N value is higher for the latter. This is because the parameter maps yield information also on the sensitivity of the solution on the neighboring parameter values and not only on a specific combination of the parameters, that might be better or worse, depending on the functional form of the variance on these parameters and noise level. The better quality of the Sloan z' data is also visible from the nearly three times smaller error of the derived occultation depth. Table 3. Observed secondary transit times for WASP-121b Dataset SMARTS (K) TRAPPIST (z') HST ('white') Spitzer (3.6) Tocc [BJD] O − C [d] −0.0080 ±0.0023 −0.0040 ±0.0027 0.0004 ±0.0004 −0.0013 ±0.0007 2457764.6469 ±0.0023 2456762.5594 ±0.0027 2457703.4588 ±0.0004 2457783.7774 ±0.0007 t14 Source 0.116 KOV18 ±0.005 0.128 KOV18 ±0.007 − EVA17 − EVA17 Notes: EVA17: Evans et al. (2017) -- KOV18: this paper (the source of the TRAPPIST data is Delrez et al. 2016) -- The O-C values are computed in respect of the ephemerides predicted from the primary transit as given by Delrez et al. (2016), assuming circular orbit. -- See text for the equality of the errors on Tocc and O − C. -- Evans et al. (2017) do not supply occultation duration values. The currently available secondary transit parameters are summarized in Table 3. In the case of the KOV18 items the errors have been computed in the following way. Once the best-fitting trapezoidal was found, we added Gaussian white noise with the observed standard deviations of the residuals corresponding to this solution, and then the best-fitting trapezoidal to these simu- lated data was searched for. By repeating the process 500 times we arrived to statistically stable estimates of the formal errors. The ingress/egress time was always fixed to the observed val- ues given by the primary transit data of Delrez et al. (2016), and we did the same also with the remaining parameters, depending which parameter was tested for errors (e.g., in the case of the occultation center, we fixed the duration and the ingress/egress times). Although this approach is primarily dictated by keep- ing the execution time within a reasonable limit, our error esti- mates for the moment of the occultation time is in perfect agree- ment with the one predicted by the analytic formula of Deeg & Tingley (2017). The errors of O − C are taken equal to those of Tocc, because the errors of the computed occultation times (C) have been proven to be negligible. We see that the available observations suggest a small (or zero) eccentricity. Since the more precise estimation requires also the knowledge of the transit duration, the lack of this param- eter for the most accurate HST and Spitzer observations makes us unable to include these data in the analysis. Therefore, we use only the occultation parameters derived from the SMARTS and TRAPPIST observations. 2 π 2  e =  ∆Tc P  2 + r14 − 1 r14 + 1  1 2 , (6) where P is the orbital period, ∆Tc is the observed time of the occultation center minus the predicted time from the primary transit, assuming zero eccentricity; r14 = t14(occ)/t14(tra), that is the ratio of the secondary and primary transit durations. Assuming that the errors are independent on the transit times and durations both for the primary and the secondary transits and that these errors are also uncorrelated with the error of the period, we can use the above equation to estimate the ec- centricity and its pure statistical error. For the primary transit and period we take the values given in Table 4 of Delrez et al. (2016). For the secondary transit we use the values shown in Table 3 of this paper. Errors are assumed to be Gaussian. Then, Eq. 6 yields e = 0.0207 ± 0.0153 if we use the SMARTS and e = 0.0314±0.0222, if we use the TRAPPIST data. These eccen- tricity values are also tested by using the primary transit center values of Evans et al. (2018) for the HST/STIS G430Lv2 band (we get very similar results also for the other bands). We note that this test is not entirely consistent, since we use the transit du- ration value of Delrez et al. (2016), because, Evans et al. (2018) do not give this parameter for their data. We get for the SMARTS and TRAPPIST data, respectively, e = 0.0198 ± 0.0157 and e = 0.0312 ± 0.0224, i.e., very close to those estimated on the basis of the primary transits of Delrez et al. (2016). In concluding, we note that Delrez et al. (2016) give a 3σ up- per limit of e = 0.07 from the global analysis of the photometric and radial velocity data. Our independent analysis is quite con- sonant with theirs. 4. Comparison with planet atmosphere models As of the time of this writing, there are the following secondary eclipse observations available for WASP-121b. The Sloan z' data at 0.9 µm by Delrez et al. (2016), the HST data in 1.1 − 1.6 µm and the Spitzer data at 3.6 µm, both by Evans et al. (2017). The main panel in Figure 7 shows the two single-band data points together with our occultation depth in the K band at 2.2 µm (see also Table 4 for the actual numerical values used). The data are overplotted on the recent planetary atmosphere models of Evans et al. (2017) and Parmentier et al. (2018). We note that although the "No dissociation" model shows very clearly that one has to consider element dissociation in modeling HJ atmospheres, it is unphysical, and it is shown merely for exhibiting the extreme case of neglecting this important physical process. This model was constructed by using chemical equilibrium chemistry in the atmospheric structure modul of the global circulation model, but H2O abundance was fixed in computing the spectrum. However, the model labelled "Solar composition" is consistent in this re- spect, and shows that the currently available data are in an over- all agreement with it6, without making any special assumption or adjustment. Unfortunately, the situation is somewhat more in- volved, as there are several other possibilities yielding spectra rather similar to that of the "Solar composition" model. For ex- ample, one may increase the heavy metal content of the "Solar composition" model by a factor of three, without any essential effect on the emission spectrum -- see Parmentier et al. (2018) for further details. Following Winn (2010), by omitting the negligible inclina- tion effect, we use the following formula to estimate the eccen- 6 By admitting the existence of systematic differences for the HST near infrared measurements of Evans et al. (2017) -- see inset of Fig 7. 5 Kovacs, G. & Kovacs, T.: The secondary transit of WASP-121b ] t p p [ / s F p F 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 No dissociation [Par18] Solar composition [Par18] Black body 2700K Black body 2360K Retrieved [Eva17] HST/WFC3 2.0 1.5 1.0 1 2 1.0 2.0 1.5 4 3 Wavelength [µm] Fig. 7. Comparison of the single-band secondary transit depths with the planetary atmosphere models of Parmentier et al. (2018, [Par18]) and Evans et al. (2017, [Eva17]). The error bars show 3σ statistical uncertainties. We warn that the "No dissociation" model is unphysical, and is shown merely to limelight the effect of omitting dissociation in the computation of the spectrum (see text for further details). The black-body lines correspond to dif- ferent efficiency of the day/night heat transport (black: fully effi- cient; gray: no heat transport). For completeness, the inset shows the HST observations of Evans et al. (2017) with their spectrum retrieval model and the solar composition model of [Par18]. For better visibility, we use 1σ error bars here. Table 4. Secondary transit depths of WASP-121b. Instr./Filter TRAPPIST (z') 2MASS K Spitzer/IRAC λc 0.9 2.2 3.6 Depth 0.697 2.280 3.670 Source Error 0.081 Delrez et al. (2016) 0.230 0.130 Evans et al. (2017) this paper Notes: Only single-band data are shown. -- The central wavelength λc is given in µm, the depth and its 1σ statistical error are given in ppt (part per thousand). a deviation of 3.2σ (the other two points deviate less than 0.5σ). Repeating the same comparison for the retrieved model of Evans et al. (2017), we get, respectively, 0.238 ppt and 4.7 for the RMS and χ2. Now all points deviates just barely under 1σ, except for the 2.2 µm point, that deviates by 1.6σ. It is important to note that the status of the outliers might change with a different way of handling systematics. As men- tioned, over-correcting systematics may lead to lower occulta- tion depth (e.g., we got larger depth from the 0.9 µm data by ∼ 0.1 ppt than the one derived by Delrez et al. 2016, quite likely, because of the lack of polynomial correction in our derivation). With the data available today, it seems that the retrieval model of Evans et al. (2017) is capable to catch most of the features of the observed spectrum. The fact that our data devi- ates by 1.6σ from their model spectrum, indicates that although additional fine tuning is needed, the basic characteristics of the data are well-matched. On the other hand, the required VO abun- dance is some thousand times of the solar value, which warrants some caution (see Evans et al. 2017 and Parmentier et al. 2018 for further discussion of this issue with the emission spectrum). Additional complications come from the more extensive data available from HST and ground-based transmission spectrum measurements. The recent analysis of these data by Evans et al. 2018) lends further support for a high (10 -- 30-times solar) VO abundance and lack of T iO. Furthermore, these data also pose some challenges in explaining the steep rise of the absorption in the near ultraviolet regime. The authors invoke sulfanyl (S H) as a possible absorber, since the standard explanation by Rayleigh scattering fails in the case of WASP-121b, due to the high atmo- spheric temperature implied by Rayleigh scattering only. Unfortunately, the currently available data on WASP-121b still too sparsely populate the more easily measurable part of the emission spectrum. In the waveband between 2 µm and 4 µm (where the CO and H2O emissions are the most pronouncing) additional data would be of great help. High S/N measurements carried out by instruments like CRIRES at VLT would be clearly capable to map this crucial region. In addition to the determi- nation of the abundances of the molecules above, this would perhaps constrain also the abundances derived from the shorter wavelength part of the spectrum, where high S/N data gathering is more difficult. The black body lines (gray and black) in Figure 7 show the effect of heat transport from the day-side to the night- side. Assuming zero Bond albedo in both cases, the black line displays the case of heat transport with maximum efficiency (AB = 0, ε = 1.0 -- see Cowan & Agol 2011, Lopez-Morales & Seager 2007). It is clear that all available data exclude this possibility and support circulation models that are rather inef- ficient, resulting in a higher day-side temperature. For WASP- 121b, this temperature seems to be close to 2700 K, correspond- ing to ε = 0.57, assuming AB = 0. In a comparison with the models of Evans et al. (2017) -- who use also the above planet temperature -- we find that their 'retrieved' model slightly under- estimates our occultation depth by 1.6σ, whereas the mismatch for the black body line of 2700 K is only 0.4σ. By scanning the planet temperature, we find that the best- fitting black body model to the three single-band data points (weighted equally) is reached when Tp = 2652 K. The RMS and the χ2 value of the residuals is 0.194 ppt and 15.4, respec- tively. All points are within 1σ, except for the one at 0.9 µm, that deviates by 3.8σ. For the solar composition model of Parmentier et al. (2018) we get 0.244 ppt and 10.3 for the RMS and χ2, re- spectively. These large values result from the Spitzer data, with 5. Conclusions We presented the first secondary transit measurements of an ex- trasolar planet in the near infrared by using a 1-m class tele- scope. With the ANDICAM imager attached to the 1.3 m tele- scope of the SMARTS Consortium, we detected an occultation depth of (0.228 ± 0.023)% in the 2MASS K band from observa- tions made in three nights on the very hot Jupiter WASP-121b. We compared this value with theoretical planetary spectra of Parmentier et al. (2018) and Evans et al. (2017) and found that it fits perfectly the former model, using solar composition, atmo- spheric circulation and molecular dissociation. However, when considering all available secondary transit data (Sloan z', HST and Spitzer data -- see Delrez et al. 2016 and Evans et al. 2017), it seems that the VO-enhanced model of Evans et al. (2017) is preferred over the solar composition model, albeit with a less favorable match to our data. Although the 2700 K black body line yields also an acceptable overall fit to the available data, the more detailed HST spectrum is not reproduced well. Additional data in the (2 -- 4) µm regime would be very useful to verify model predictions on CO and H2O emissions and build a more coherent planet atmosphere model. 6 Kovacs, G. & Kovacs, T.: The secondary transit of WASP-121b acquisition period is much appreciated. We also thank the referee for the critical notes on our early interpretation of the planet atmosphere models. The observa- tions have been supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA, grant K-81373). TK acknowledges the support of Bolyai Research Fellowship. Additional grants (PD 121223 and K 129249) from the National Research, Development and Innovation Office are also acknowledged. References Adams, A. D. & Laughlin, G. 2018, AJ, 156, 28 Alonso, R. 2018, Handbook of Exoplanets, ISBN 978-3-319-55332-0, id.40 (arXiv:1803.06204) Anderson, D. R., Temple, L. Y., Nielsen, L. D. et al. 2018, submitted to MNRAS, (arXiv: 1809.04897) Bakos, G. ´A., Torres, G., P´al, A. et al. 2010, ApJ, 710, 1724 Baskin, N. J., Knutson H. A., Burrows, A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 773, 124 Cowan, N. B. & Agol, E. 2011, ApJ, 729, 54 Croll, B., Albert, L., Jayawardhana, R. et al. 2015, ApJ, 802, 28 Cruz, P., Barrado, D., Lillo-Box, J. et al. 2015, A&A, 574A, 103 Deeg, H. J. & Tingley, B. 2017, A&A, 599, A93 Delrez, L., Santerne, A., Almenara, J.-M. et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 4025 Deming, D., Seager, S., Richardson, L. J., & Harrington, J. 2005, Nature, 434, 740 Evans, T. M., Sing, D. K., Wakeford, H. R. et al. 2016, ApJ, 822, L4 Evans, T. M., Sing, D. K., Kataria, T. et al. 2017, Nature, 548, 58 Evans, T. M., Sing, D. K., Goyal, J. M. et al., 2018, AJ, 156, 283 Kreidberg, L., Line, M. R., Bean, J. L., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 66 Komacek, T. D., & Showman, A. P. 2016, ApJ, 821, 16 Lopez-Morales, M. & Seager, S. 2007, ApJ, 667, L191 Martioli, E., Col´on, K. D., Angerhausen, D. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4264 Parmentier, V., Line, M. R., Bean, J. L. et al. 2018, A&A, 617, 110 Pollacco D. L., Skillen, I., Collier Cameron, A. et al. 2006, PASP, 118, 1407 Stevenson, K. B., Harrington, J., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 136 Winn, J. N. 2010, arXiv:1001.2010v5 Zhou, G., Bayliss, D. D. R., Kedziora-Chudczer, L. et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3002 ] t p p [ s b o δ 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 δcal [ppt] 2.0 Fig. 8. Observed vs calculated secondary transit depths for the 32 extrasolar planets known today with emission measurements at ∼ 2.2 µm. Nearly all observations lie above the equality line, corresponding to the calculated/expected black body value, as- suming effective heat transport from the day side to the night side. WASP-121b is shown as a red square. Error bars show 1σ statistical errors. studies In agreement with other (e.g., Adams & Laughlin 2018, and references therein), our data support the lack of efficient day-to-night side heat transport (see Fig. 7). This conclusion is further strengthened if we compare the predicted and observed occultation depths by using all available data today. Based on the list of Alonso (2018), we collected the secondary transit depths measured in the 2MASS K band for 32 Hot Jupiters (see Croll et al. 2015, Cruz et al. 2015, Zhou et al. 2015, Martioli et al. 2018 and this paper). The observed depths as a function of the expected value (assuming zero Bond albedo and fully efficient heat transport) are shown in Fig. 8. The figure clearly shows a nearly uniform offset, with no apparent dependence on the expected depth. The effect is exacerbated if we consider more realistic albedos as suggested by recent analyses of full orbit phase curves -- see Adams & Laughlin (2018). We arrive to a similar conclusion if we examine the differ- ence between the observed and calculated occultation depths as a function, e.g., of the temperature at the substellar point. Therefore, -- admitting the need for a more complete charac- terization of the heat distribution by directly measuring the night- and day-side fluxes (i.e., Komacek & Showman 2016) -- from the 2.2 µm measurements alone, there does not seem to exist a correlation between the heat redistribution efficiency and planet temperature (i.e., Cowan & Agol 2011, Komacek & Showman 2016). Supporting our result, it is interesting to note that a similar study by Baskin et al. (2013), based on Spitzer 3.6 µm and 4.5 µm data has led to the same conclusion. Although our observations were made in a single waveband, they yield a reasonably solid piece of information both on the orbital and on the atmospheric characterization of the WASP- 121 system. Together with future emission data in the (2 -- 4) µm band they will allow to prove or deny the existence of the CO, H2O emission feature on the day side predicted by the models in this waveband. Acknowledgements. We thank to Laetitia Delrez for sending us the secondary transit observations presented in the discovery paper on WASP-121. We are grateful to Vivien Parmentier for making the relevant planet atmosphere models accessible to us and helping in the comprehension of the models. The profes- sional help given by the SMARTS staff at the Yale University during the data 7
1312.2676	1	1312	2013-12-10T05:54:45	Dispersion in Neptune's Zonal Wind Velocities from NIR Keck AO Observations in July 2009	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We report observations of Neptune made in H-(1.4-1.8 {\mu}m) and K'-(2.0-2.4 {\mu}m) bands on 14 and 16 July 2009 from the 10-m W.M. Keck II Telescope using the near-infrared camera NIRC2 coupled to the Adaptive Optics (AO) system. We track the positions of 54 bright atmospheric features over a few hours to derive their zonal and latitudinal velocities, and perform radiative transfer modeling to measure the cloud-top pressures of 50 features seen simultaneously in both bands. We observe one South Polar Feature (SPF) on 14 July and three SPFs on 16 July at ~65 deg S. The SPFs observed on both nights are different features, consistent with the high variability of Neptune's storms. There is significant dispersion in Neptune's zonal wind velocities about the smooth Voyager wind profile fit of Sromovsky et al., Icarus 105, 140 (1993), much greater than the upper limit we expect from vertical wind shear, with the largest dispersion seen at equatorial and southern mid-latitudes. Comparison of feature pressures vs. residuals in zonal velocity from the smooth Voyager wind profile also directly reveals the dominance of mechanisms over vertical wind shear in causing dispersion in the zonal winds. Vertical wind shear is not the primary cause of the difference in dispersion and deviation in zonal velocities between features tracked in H-band on 14 July and those tracked in K'-band on 16 July. Dispersion in the zonal velocities of features tracked over these short time periods is dominated by one or more mechanisms, other than vertical wind shear, that can cause changes in the dispersion and deviation in the zonal velocities on timescales of hours to days.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Dispersion in Neptune's Zonal Wind Velocities from NIR Keck AO Observations in July 2009 Patrick J. Fitzpatrick1, Imke de Pater1,2, Statia Luszcz-Cook1,3, Michael H. Wong1, Heidi B. Hammel4 Abstract We report observations of Neptune made in H-(1.4- 1.8 µm) and K'-(2.0-2.4 µm) bands on 14 and 16 July 2009 from the 10-m W.M. Keck II Telescope using the near-infrared camera NIRC2 coupled to the Adaptive Optics (AO) system. We track the positions of 54 bright atmospheric features over a few hours to derive their zonal and latitudinal velocities, and perform radiative transfer modeling to measure the cloud-top pressures of 50 features seen simultaneously in both bands. We observe one South Polar Feature (SPF) on 14 July and three SPFs on 16 July at ∼65◦S. The SPFs observed on both nights are different features, consis- tent with the high variability of Neptune's storms. There is significant dispersion in Neptune's zonal wind velocities about the smooth Voyager wind profile fit of Sromovsky et al., Icarus 105, 140 (1993), much greater than the upper limit we expect from vertical wind shear, with the largest dispersion seen at equa- torial and southern mid-latitudes. Comparison of fea- ture pressures vs. residuals in zonal velocity from the smooth Voyager wind profile also directly reveals the dominance of mechanisms over vertical wind shear in causing dispersion in the zonal winds. Vertical wind shear is not the primary cause of the difference in dispersion and deviation in zonal veloc- Patrick J. Fitzpatrick, Michael H. Wong, Heidi B. Hammel Imke de Pater, Statia Luszcz-Cook, Email: [email protected] (PJF) 1Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 2Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technol- ogy, 2629 HS Delft, and SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands 3Astrophysics Department, American Museum of Natural His- tory, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA 4AURA, 1212 New York Ave. NW, Suite 450, Washington, DC 20005, USA ities between features tracked in H-band on 14 July and those tracked in K'-band on 16 July. Dispersion in the zonal velocities of features tracked over these short time periods is dominated by one or more mechanisms, other than vertical wind shear, that can cause changes in the dispersion and deviation in the zonal velocities on timescales of hours to days. Keywords infrared: planetary systems; planets and satellites: Neptune: atmospheres 1 Introduction The zonal wind velocities of the giant planets can be derived by tracking the motions of cloud features in their atmospheres. Accurate tracking of the mo- tions of cloud features in Neptune's atmosphere was first achieved with data from the Voyager 2 space- craft in 1989 (Stone & Miner 1989). Sromovsky et al. (1993) made a smooth fit to the zonal velocities vs. latitudes of discrete cloud features in Neptune's at- mosphere which were tracked by Limaye & Sromovsky (1991) in Voyager 2 images. Neptune's canonical zonal wind profile is this smooth Voyager wind profile. The wind velocities derived from individual features in Nep- tune's atmosphere since Voyager 2 are observed to re- main consistent with this smooth Voyager wind pro- file, with the exception of features which display sig- nificant deviation in zonal velocity, presumably due to mechanisms such as vertical wind shear, wave phe- nomena, or eddy motions, and which have sometimes been associated with structures such as dark spots (e.g. Hammel & Lockwood 1997; Sromovsky et al. 2001b,c, 2002). Sromovsky et al. (2001c) found deviations from the smooth Voyager wind profile in 1998 HST ob- servations which were consistent with observations in 2 1995 and 1996 (Sromovsky et al. 2001b), but they con- cluded that more measurements are needed to confirm a change in Neptune's zonal wind structure. Striking dispersion and variation in zonal wind veloc- ities has been observed on Neptune since the Voyager era (Smith et al. 1989). Limaye & Sromovsky (1991) found significant dispersion in zonal wind velocities, with the greatest dispersion found for more short- lived features, and at equatorial and mid-latitudes. Sromovsky et al. (1993) also noted significant devia- tion in the zonal velocities of cloud features about their smooth Voyager profile fit to the data of Limaye & Sro- movsky (1991). Hammel & Lockwood (1997) studied the zonal motions of cloud features in 1995 HST images, along with those for features found in Voyager images (Limaye & Sromovsky 1991; Hammel 1989), Voyager radio occultation data (Lindal et al. 1990), 1991 HST data (Sromovsky et al. 1995), and ground-based data (see Sromovsky et al. (1993) Table VII) and noted that all measurements show dispersion in velocities in nar- row bands of latitude, which the authors indicated as evidence for shear, wave phenomena, or other local dis- turbances. Sromovsky et al. (2001b) found significant deviation in zonal velocities from the smooth Voyager wind profile for features tracked in HST data from 1994, 1995, and 1996. The authors found deviation in 1996 HST data to be mostly associated with a Great Dark Spot at 32◦N, thought to be the same dark spot seen in 1994 HST images of Neptune at 30◦N (Hammel et al. 1995). The authors associated dispersion in this region with waves propagating from this Great Dark Spot or associated standing waves. The more recent analysis of Martin et al. (2012) re- veals significant dispersion in zonal wind velocities from the smooth Voyager wind profile. Martin et al. (2012) observed Neptune in H-band with the Keck AO sys- tem for 4 hours on UT 20 and 21 August, and for ∼1 hour on UT 1 September, 2001. The authors reliably measured the relative velocities of almost 200 clouds in Neptune's atmosphere, characterizing the dispersion in Neptune's zonal wind velocities about the smooth Voy- ager wind profile. The authors found significant disper- sion in zonal wind velocity (with variations as high as ∼500 m/s), greater than the upper limit they placed on the contribution to dispersion caused by vertical wind shear, and which they attributed primarily to outlying transient clouds that do not move with their local mass flow. We conduct a similar study as Martin et al. (2012), except we track the motions of Neptune's cloud fea- tures in both H- (∼1.6µm) and K'- (∼2.2µm) bands (in observations separated by ∼3 Neptune rotations), which are sensitive to a different range of altitudes in Neptune's atmosphere, to search for potential differ- ences between the two wavelengths. We also perform radiative transfer modeling to estimate the pressures of features. Comparison of the zonal velocities of fea- tures with their estimated pressures provides a direct probe of the relative contribution of vertical wind shear to dispersion in the zonal wind velocities. Because our observations in H-band probe a greater overall mag- nitude and range of depths in Neptune's atmosphere than those in K'-band, comparing the dispersion ob- served between the two filters can also give us insight into the relative contribution of vertical wind shear to dispersion in the zonal winds. In Section 2 we describe our observations and data, including our method of alignment and cylindrical pro- jection of images. In Section 3 we describe our method of tracking the longitude-latitude positions of atmo- spheric features in our images. Section 4 describes our results for the dispersion in Neptune's zonal winds, along with our results for the depths of features from radiative transfer modeling, and our observations of the South Polar Features. In Section 5 we discuss our re- sults in the context of a few relevant mechanisms which can cause dispersion in Neptune's zonal winds and we compare the dispersion observed in H- and K'-bands on 14 and 16 July, respectively. Finally, Section 6 summa- rizes our conclusions. 2 Data 2.1 Observations and Data Reduction We observed Neptune from the 10-m W.M. Keck II Telescope on Mauna Kea, Hawaii, on 14 and 16 July 2009 (UT) as part of a project to study the planet's at- mosphere and rings at near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths. H-(1.4-1.8µm) and K'-(2.0-2.4µm) band images were taken using the narrow camera of the NIRC2 instru- ment, coupled to the AO system. The 1024×1024 array has a pixel scale of 9.963±0.011 mas/pixel in this mode (Pravdo et al. 2006), which at the time of observations corresponded to a physical scale of ∼210 km/pixel at disk center. Although we observed Neptune in both bands on each day, images were more frequently taken in H-band on 14 July and in K'-band on 16 July. On 14 July we took a total of 75 H-band images spanning ∼2.5 hours (11:20:21 - 13:47:44 (UT)) and on 16 July we took a total of 105 K'-band images spanning ∼3.5 hours (10:54:57 - 14:20:09 (UT)). The integration times of both H- and K'-band images are 60 sec, which provide enough signal to noise without saturating our detector, 3 and assure that smearing due to Neptune's rotation is less than one image pixel. Short integration times en- able a dense sampling of images over time, allowing us to accurately identify the same features in succes- sive images. Our data were taken in ∼5-min sequences of five frames each. Largest separations between se- quences of images were ∼30 min, during which obser- vations of photometric standards were carried out. We reduced images using standard infrared data re- duction techniques of sky subtraction, flat fielding, and median-value masking to remove bad pixels. All im- ages were corrected for the geometric distortion of the array using the 'dewarp' routines provided by P. Brian Cameron,1 who estimates residual errors at .0.1 pix- els. We measured angular resolution with the full width at half maxima (FWHM) of Neptune's moons visible in our images. We measure FWHM in H-band on 14 July of 0.050±0.004" and in K'-band on 16 July of 0.049±0.005", which are consistent with the diffraction limit of our telescope at 2µm (van Dam et al. 2004), and correspond to effective resolutions of ∼1,060 km and ∼1,037 km at the center of the disk, respectively. Images were photometrically calibrated using the star HD201941, and were converted from units of ob- served flux density to units of I/F, which is defined as (Hammel et al. 1989a): I F = r2 Ω FN F⊙ , (1) where r is Neptune's heliocentric distance, πF⊙ is the Sun's flux density at Earth's orbit (Colina et al. 1996), FN is Neptune's observed flux density, and Ω is the solid angle subtended by a pixel on the detector. By this definition, I/F=1 for uniformly diffuse scattering from a Lambert surface when viewed at normal incidence. 2.2 Locations of Cloud Features Figure 1 shows Neptune images on both days of obser- vation in H-band (left panels) and K'-band (right pan- els), taken towards the beginning (1st and 3rd rows) and end (2nd and 4th rows) of each night. On both 14 and 16 July we observed Neptune at roughly the same longitudes (these images are separated by ∼3 Neptune rotations). We immediately note that at- mospheric features tend to be distributed preferen- tially along bands of constant latitude, with increased prevalence at mid-latitudes, in agreement with previous observations (e.g. Sromovsky et al. 2001b; Max et al. 2003; Irwin et al. 2011; Martin et al. 2012). In addition to clouds at roughly the same latitudes as Martin et al. (2012), we observe clouds at ∼40◦N. In all images there is an absence of cloud features just south of the equator, in agreement with previous observations (e.g. Limaye & Sromovsky 1991; Martin et al. 2012). At- mospheric features vary drastically between 14 and 16 July. Feature morphology changes so dramatically that we cannot with certainty identify the same features present on both nights, as has been noted in previous observations (e.g. Sromovsky et al. 2001b; Karkoschka 2011b). In all 14 July images we observe a large bright fea- ture centered at ∼65◦S. In 16 July images, centered at the same latitude, we observe three distinct fea- tures instead of the large bright feature seen on 14 July. Due to foreshortening effects, these three features ap- pear to begin to coalesce into one as they approach the limb at the end of the night. Features in this latitude region have been identified in previous observations as South Polar Features (SPFs; e.g. Hammel et al. 1989b; Smith et al. 1989; Limaye & Sromovsky 1991; Sromovsky et al. 1993; Crisp et al. 1994; Hammel & Lockwood 1997; Sromovsky et al. 2001b,c; Rages et al. 2002; Karkoschka 2011a; Martin et al. 2012). We will discuss these SPFs in Section 4.4. In all H-band images we observe a small bright feature at the south pole of the planet. In K'-band we cannot see this feature. This feature has been observed since the Voyager era (e.g. Smith et al. 1989; Limaye & Sromovsky 1991; Hammel et al. 2007; Luszcz-Cook et al. 2010; Karkoschka 2011a). As seen by Limaye & Sromovsky (1991), this feature persisted in the Voyager observations over many Neptune rota- tions, and the authors were tempted to suggest that it marked the planet's true rotation pole, as doing so would remove a mean meridional velocity bias which puzzled them. Martin et al. (2012) assumed this 'south pole dot' to mark Neptune's true rotation pole in veri- fying image navigation, and found the planet center de- duced from the south pole dot to agree with that deter- mined from limb fitting within 1 image pixel (16.7±0.2 mas). There is no a priori reason to assume the feature at the south pole to mark Neptune's true rotation pole. In fact in previous observations a pair of south polar spots have been seen ∼1-2◦ away from the south pole (Luszcz-Cook et al. 2010; Karkoschka 2011a), and the former authors suggested that these clouds may form in a region of strong convection surrounding a south polar vortex. 2.3 Image Navigation and Cylindrical Projection 1http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/inst/post observing/dewarp/ nirc2dewarp.pro To navigate and align our images we must determine the location of the physical center of Neptune in each 4 image to within sub-pixel accuracy. We do so using a multivariate nonlinear χ2 minimization routine which simultaneously fits for the positions of three moons onto their respective orbits for each disk image. The orbit of each moon was derived using the ephemeris genera- tors in the Rings Node of NASA's Planetary Data Sys- tem (http://pds-rings.seti.org/). We derive moon or- bits rather than use their individual locations given by the ephemeris generators due to uncertainties in the lat- ter (e.g. Jacobsen & Owen 2004; de Pater et al. 2005). This is based on the fitting routine used to align Nep- tune images by Luszcz-Cook et al. (2010). In 14 July H-band images we fit for the simultaneous positions of Galatea, Larissa, and Despina, and in 16 July K'-band images we fit for the simultaneous positions of Galatea, Larissa, and Proteus. Our mean (x, y) uncertainties in the derived Neptune centers in our images (calculated from the variance modified by a factor of the reduced- χ2) for H- and K'-bands are (0.08 pix,0.07 pix) and (0.09 pix,0.08 pix), respectively. The accuracy of the alignment of our images can be judged from Figure 2, which shows mean averages of the stack of aligned images in each filter. The positions of each individual moon trace out visible orbits in the averaged image. In order to better resolve these orbits we high-pass filter each averaged image by subtract- ing from it an identical image that has been median- smoothed with a width of 30 pixels. High-pass filter- ing the averaged image eliminates large features that dominate the intensity range and allows high resolution of faint structure such as Neptune's moons and rings. Neptune's Adams and Le Verrier rings are clearly vis- ible in both images in Figure 2. In both H- and K'- bands we can clearly distinguish the orbits of Despina, Galatea, and Larissa, although those of Despina and Galatea are difficult to distinguish from the nearby Le Verrier and Adams rings. In K'-band we can also dis- tinguish the orbit of Proteus. We superpose the orbits we derived for these moons in Figure 2. The moon or- bits physically traced in our averaged high-pass filtered images align well with the superposed derived moon or- bits, reflecting the accuracy of our alignment and Nep- tune center determinations. After precise location of Neptune's center, we trans- form the data to regularly gridded, cylindrical coordi- nates, using the same code described in Asay-Davis et al. (2009) and Lii et al. (2010). For the transforma- tion from sky coordinates to planetographic latitude- longitude coordinates on Neptune's 1-bar surface, we use equations similar to those in Hueso et al. (2010), but simplified with the plane-parallel assumption. Fi- nally, we use IDL's trigrid function to resample the latitude-longitude data on a regular grid. An example of a transformed image from our cylindrical projection is shown in Figure 3. 3 Tracking Atmospheric Features We use the velocities of cloud features as a tracer for atmospheric wind velocities, and therefore track the po- sitions of cloud features in our images. After transfor- mation of each image frame, we combine the five frames within each sequence together in a mean average. We track the positions of cloud features in these trans- formed averaged images. On average, zonal drift rates over 5 min are smaller (<0.65◦/5 min) than an effec- tive angular resolution element at disc center (∼2.4◦). Averaging images does not significantly smear features and increases signal-to-noise, allowing us to better dis- tinguish faint, fine features. Averaging sets of H-band data from 14 July yields 15 averaged images and av- eraging sets of K'-band data from 16 July yields 21 averaged images. In order to track cloud features we first identify them between successive transformed averaged images by constructing images such as Figure 4, which shows suc- cessive transformed averaged images in strips of fixed latitude (from 52-30◦S) stacked with time increasing along the vertical axis. We define a feature as having an observed brightness distribution distinct from features around it and per- sisting in at least 4 successive images. Studying Figure 4: bright atmospheric features show a broad range of dynamics. Some features persist relatively consistently in brightness and morphology (blue dashed lines), while others are very ephemeral (yellow dashed lines), ap- pearing and disappearing or significantly varying in morphology on minute timescales. It appears that the smallest features tend also to be the most ephemeral, as was also noted in the Voyager era (Smith et al. 1989). Our initial interpretation of images such as Figure 4 is that features in K'-band evolve more rapidly and ap- pear more ephemeral. This, however, could be due to the greater number of smaller features observed on 16 July. We compare the dispersion in zonal velocities between 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features in Section 5.2. After we identify distinct features, we measure their longitude-latitude positions in each transformed av- eraged image following the method of Martin et al. (2012): for a single feature in a transformed averaged image we take an initial contour of the image at an in- tensity level that outlines that feature. After isolating this feature we then take three more contours of this fea- ture at intensity levels defined at 60%, 70%, and 80% of 5 the maximum intensity within the initial contour. We define the center of a feature as the midpoint between longitudinal and latitudinal extrema of a given contour; three individual feature center positions are measured using these three contours. We define the final feature center position as the average of these three measured center positions. The uncertainty in feature center po- sition is defined as the sum in quadrature of the stan- dard deviation of the three measured center positions and navigation uncertainty associated with location of Neptune center position in untransformed images. We repeat this procedure for each tracked feature through- out each of the images in which it is identified. An example illustrating our method is shown in Figure 5. 4 Results 4.1 Deriving Zonal Drift Rates Our results for 14 July H-band features are shown in Figure 6 and those for 16 July K'-band features are shown in Figure 7. Here we show the longitude posi- tions of each tracked feature versus time, separated into latitude bins identified above each panel. At fixed latitude, we expect the longitude positions of atmospheric features to move linearly with time, in agreement with the smooth Voyager wind profile of Sromovsky et al. (1993). We expect the latitudi- nal speeds of most features to be consistent with zero. We derive longitudinal and latitudinal drift rates for each feature by fitting lines to their longitudes vs. time and latitudes vs. time using a Monte-Carlo iteration routine. Our routine fits position vs. time data to a line using the function ladfit in IDL (which fits data to a linear model using a "robust" least absolute devia- tion method) with each iteration sampling each posi- tion measurement from a normal distribution centered on the original position measurement with a width the size of the uncertainty in that measurement. We make ∼1,000 iterations until our fits converge. We use the means of the fit parameters from all iterations as our output fit parameters, and the standard deviations of the fit parameters from all iterations as the uncertain- ties in our output fit parameters. Our derived drift rates are shown as solid and dotted lines over our data in Figures 6 and 7. Also shown in Figures 6 and 7, overplotted onto each feature using a dashed line, are slopes indicating the longitudinal drift rates expected at the latitude of each feature according to the smooth Voyager wind profile of Sromovsky et al. (1993). We see that, although many features follow constant drift rates, as we expect, there are also many features whose individual longitude positions show sig- nificant variation off of these constant drift rates. Non- constant velocities could include true variability, but could also include measurement errors. Sources of er- ror include changes in cloud morphology, image navi- gation errors, and feature centroiding errors. For in- stance, anomalous longitude position measurements at ∼70 min on July 14 at multiple latitudes argue strongly for some type of measurement error. Therefore, in order to disentangle the effect of large variations in individ- ual longitude position measurements, either real or due to error, from dispersion in derived mean longitudinal drift rates, we separate features by the mean of their ab- solute residuals in individual longitude position about their derived longitudinal drift rates, σrl. Our selection is shown in Figure 8. We divide features into "Low- σrl" (σrl ≤ 0.7 deg) and "High-σrl" (σrl > 0.7 deg). The best-defined feature tracks are in the Low-σrl bin, which contains 25 of 41 July 14 H-band features, and 29 of 46 July 16 K'-band features. A combination of true variability and unknown sources of uncertainty manifests itself as deviations from linear motion. In order to obtain upper limits to uncertainties for the derived zonal velocities of Low- σrl features, we assume all scatter in the individual measurements of Low-σrl features about their smooth motion is due to unknown errors, and do the following: for each Low-σrl feature whose value for the reduced- χ2 of observed longitude-time data about its derived zonal drift rate is greater than 1, we solve for an ad- ditional contribution to the total uncertainty in longi- tude position such that the reduced-χ2 is equal to 1, assuming this additional source of uncertainty to con- tribute equally to each longitude position measurement for a given feature, and to be random and uncorrelated with the sources of uncertainty in longitude position already considered; that is, for each Low-σrl feature with χ2 red >1 we solve the following expression for an additional unknown source of uncertainty in longitude position, σu: (φi−φexp,i)2 σ2 cent,i+σ2 nav,i+σ2 = 1, u red = 1 χ2 N −2 N P i=1 where N is the total number of longitude-time mea- surements, φi are the measured longitude positions, φexp,i are the corresponding longitude positions ex- pected from a feature's derived zonal drift rate, σcent,i is the standard deviation of the three measured feature center positions composing the mean longitude position (from the 60%, 70%, and 80% intensity contours), and σnav,i is the contribution from navigation uncertainty. Once we solve for σu this way, we include it as a con- tribution to the uncertainty in each longitude position measurement of its corresponding feature and recom- pute that feature's zonal drift rate and its uncertainty 6 in the same way outlined above. The resulting longi- tude position errors and derived drift rates are those shown in Figures 6 and 7. We make this correction for all Low-σrl features. To quantify the relative magni- tude of σu, we compute the ratio of σu to the initially estimated sources of longitude position measurement uncertainty (ηu,i = σu/(σcent,i + σnav,i)) for each fea- ture. For 14 July H-band features the mean ηu is 9.4 and for 16 July K'-band features the mean ηu is 4.9. We make the same correction for errors in latitude position for all Low-σrl 14 July H-band features and for 25 Low- σrl 16 July K'-band features. Defining a similar ηu,lat for unknown errors in latitude position: for 14 July H- band features the mean ηu,lat is 5.9 and for 16 July K'-band features the mean ηu,lat is 3.4. All uncertain- ties in feature velocities and drift rates presented here are derived including the contribution of σu to measure- ment uncertainty. Because σu includes both unknown sources of measurement error and true variability, the uncertainties we present in feature velocities and drift rates are upper limits to the true uncertainties. We distinguish between High- (red) and Low-σrl (blue) features in Figures 6 and 7. We note that there is a greater number of High-σrl features found in K'- band, probably due to the fact that a greater num- ber of smaller features (which we said tend to be more ephemeral) were observed on 16 July. We note that a number of 16 July K'-band features display a pattern suggestive of east-west temporal oscillation, similar to what was observed by Martin et al. (2012). However, this pattern occurs simultaneously at t≃50-150 min and with similar periods and phases for a number of features at different locations on the planet. This suggests that the observed pattern may be caused by some type of measurement error, as discussed above. For this reason we also classify these features as High-σrl. We focus on Low-σrl features in our analysis of dispersion in wind speeds. Comparing the drift rates expected from the smooth Voyager wind profile with our derived drift rates in Fig- ures 6 and 7 we note deviation from the smooth Voyager wind profile. Variation in zonal drift rates within indi- vidual latitude bins reveals dispersion about the smooth Voyager wind profile. While large deviation from the smooth Voyager wind profile is more frequently found among High-σrl features, for which deviation in drift rate is strongly entangled with scatter in individual po- sition measurement, Low-σrl features show significant dispersion as well. We note, however, that we cannot fully confirm or quantify dispersion in zonal velocities from Figures 6 and 7, because uncertainties in the de- rived drift rates are not shown. We better quantify the dispersion we observe in Neptune's zonal wind veloci- ties in what follows. 4.2 Dispersion in Zonal Wind Velocities We translate the drift rates of atmospheric features into wind velocities according to the following relations: Vlon = Req cos θ dφ dt , Vlat = (cid:0)Req sin2 θ + Rpol cos2 θ(cid:1) dθ dt , (2) (3) where Vlon and Vlat are the zonal and latitudinal veloc- ities of atmospheric features (m/s), Req=24,766×103 m is Neptune's equatorial radius, Rpol=24,342×103 m is Neptune's polar radius, and dφ/dt and dθ/dt are derived zonal and latitudinal drift rates (rad/s), where, for dφ/dt, motion from astronomical east to west is taken to be the positive direction. Our de- rived zonal velocities for 14 July H- and 16 July K'- band Low-σrl features are shown in Figures 9 and 10, respectively, against the smooth Voyager wind profile of Sromovsky et al. (1993) (black solid line). They are also listed for each feature in Tables 2 and 3, along with other relevant quantities associated with the motion of each feature. We plot features such that the size of the square used to represent distinct features increases lin- early with the length of time over which a feature was tracked. The longest and shortest tracking times we obtain in H-band are 139 min and 24 min, respectively, and the longest and shortest tracking times we obtain in K'-band are 198 min and 21 min, respectively. Considering both Figures 9 and 10 we observe signif- icant deviation from and dispersion about the smooth Voyager wind profile. Low-σrl features which scat- ter most from the smooth Voyager wind profile are those which were tracked for shorter time periods. In- creased dispersion is seen at equatorial and southern mid-latitudes. On average, greater dispersion is seen among 14 July H-band features. Although Low-σrl 16 July K'-band features are on average found to be consistent with the smooth Voy- ager wind profile within uncertainties, we find signifi- cant deviation, ∆Vlon,σ, for 16 July K'-band features from the smooth Voyager wind profile (including its width of uncertainty) as high as 290±77 m/s (at the equator).2 Low-σrl H-band features show a significant 2Two descriptions of the deviation in zonal velocities from the smooth Voyager wind profile are used throughout. ∆Vlon,σ, which is presented here, takes into account uncertainty in the smooth Voyager wind profile. For a feature that is faster than the smooth Voyager wind profile, ∆Vlon,σ ≡ Vlon−(Vvoy + σvoy), where Vvoy and σvoy are the zonal velocity and its uncertainty predicted by the smooth Voyager profile at the latitude of the 7 average absolute deviation of 177±55 m/s. Deviation from the smooth Voyager wind profile of 14 July H-band features is found as high as ∼500 m/s, although uncer- tainties in these measurements are large -- as high as 25% at 23◦S and 50% at the equator. We more closely examine the difference in dispersion between 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features in Section 5.2. Previous studies tracking the motions of Neptune's cloud features have found significant dispersion and de- viation in the zonal velocities. Limaye & Sromovsky (1991) found variation as high as ∼750 m/s in the zonal velocities of individual features at fixed latitude, with the greatest variation at equatorial and mid-latitudes. When only considering features whose uncertainties in zonal velocity were <25 m/s, the authors found the standard deviation of the zonal velocities about the mean, averaged within 1-degree latitude bins, to be as high as ∼275 m/s. Sromovsky et al. (2001b) tracked the motions of bright cloud features in HST data from 1994, 1995, and 1996, and found deviation in zonal velocities from the smooth Voyager profile as high as ∼175 m/s for features tracked over time periods rang- ing from ∼1-18 hrs. Martin et al. (2012) found devia- tion in zonal velocities from the smooth Voyager profile as high as ∼500 m/s for features tracked over ∼1-4 hrs in NIR Keck AO images of Neptune in 2001. Using the velocities of cloud features as tracers for atmospheric wind velocities, we agree with previous results and ob- serve significant dispersion in Neptune's wind velocities about its mean zonal wind profile. 4.3 Cloud Feature Pressures From Radiative Transfer Modeling We use radiative transfer modeling to estimate the pressures of a selection of 50 features that were visi- ble in both H- and K'-bands from the beginning and end of both nights. Model spectra are produced using a 300-layer two-stream radiative transfer code, which is described in detail in Appendix B of Luszcz-Cook (2012). We adopt the temperature profile derived by Fletcher et al. (2010) throughout the atmosphere. We feature considered. For a feature that is slower than the smooth Voyager profile, ∆Vlon,σ ≡ Vvoy − σvoy − Vlon. According to this definition, a positive value of ∆Vlon,σ greater than its un- certainty represents a feature with significant deviation in zonal velocity, while a negative value of ∆Vlon,σ represents a feature that is consistent with the smooth Voyager profile. The quan- tity ∆Vlon ≡ Vlon − Vvoy measures deviation from the smooth Voyager wind profile without consideration of uncertainty in the latter. This quantity is used mainly when comparing deviation of two features or sets of features. These quantities are specified in context. A Graphical illustration of these two definitions of deviation is shown in the top legend of Figure 9. assume a mixing ratio of 0.15 for He and 0.003 for N2 (Conrath et al. 1993). The methane (CH4) abun- dance follows Fletcher et al. (2010) in the upper atmo- sphere and remains at a mole fraction of 0.022 in the troposphere below the condensation level (Baines et al. 1995). The gas opacity at these wavelengths is dom- inated by H2 collision-induced absorption (CIA) and CH4 opacity; for CIA we use the coefficients for hydro- gen, helium and methane from Borysow et al. (1985, 1988) and Borysow (1991, 1992, 1993), assuming an equilibrium ortho/para ratio for H2. For methane, we use the correlated-k method and follow the recommen- dations of Sromovsky et al. (2012) for outer planet NIR spectra. As the spectral information in our data is limited, we use a simplified model of the atmospheric cloud/haze distribution. We assume the presence of an opti- cally thick bottom 'surface' cloud and set the depth of this cloud to 2.4 bar. We set the Henyey-Greenstein asymmetry parameter of the bottom cloud to -0.1 (preferentially backscattering) and adjust the single scattering albedo to match the data as described in Luszcz-Cook et al. (2010). Luszcz-Cook (2012) shows that this model fits the µ dependence of the spectrum in a dark part of Neptune's disk in field-integral spectro- scopic (OSIRIS) data obtained at Keck. For this sim- plified model, we allow for one additional aerosol layer above the bottom cloud; the particles in this higher- altitude haze/cloud layer are treated as Mie scatterers: we assume that ensembles of particles are distributed according to n (r) ∝ r6 exp (−6r/rmax) (4) where n (r) is the number density of particles of radius r, and rmax is the maximum in the particle distribu- tion (Hansen & Pollack 1970) and is set to 1.0 µm (e.g. Irwin et al. 2011). This particle size distribution is analogous to that found on Titan (Mitchell et al. 2011). The extinction cross section and Henyey-Greenstein asymmetry parameter of the scattering are calculated using Mie theory. We assume that the particles have a scale height that is 0.1 times the gas scale height, cor- responding to physically thin cloud layers (Irwin et al. 2011). The free parameters in the model are the num- ber density of cloud particles at the bottom (maximum) pressure of the haze/cloud, and the altitude (pressure) of the cloud. For each feature identified in the data for modeling, we fit the observed H- and K'- band I/F val- ues given the viewing geometry (µ) in the following way: for each of 40 model pressure levels distributed (loga- rithmically) from 3 mbar to 3 bar, we determine the cloud particle number density that would best match the model H-band I/F to the observed H-band I/F. 8 We repeat this procedure for K'-band, then we find the pressure at which the H and K'-band best-fit number densities agree; that is, we determine the pressure at which a cloud of some particle density can best repro- duce both the H- and K'-band I/F values. Cloud-top pressure retrievals are shown in Figures 11a and 11b. At different latitudes, the range of de- rived cloud pressures varies by as much as a factor of ∼4, with the greatest range in pressures found at south- ern mid-latitudes (60◦S to 27◦S), spanning ∼0.5 bar (∼2 scale heights). Clouds at northern latitudes (above 20◦N) lie at higher altitudes (∼0.1-0.2 bar). We note, however, that clouds at northern latitudes are system- atically higher in emission angle, and from these lim- ited data we cannot rule out a systematic bias in the model with µ. Although the 2D relation of pressure vs. µ in Figure 11b seems suggestive of a bias with µ, this effect is entangled with any dependence of cloud pressure on latitude, and within fixed latitude bins (in- cluding the 3rd dimension shown by symbol shape and color in Figure 11b) there is not an obvious bias with µ. For example, aside from one feature at ∼50◦S found at ∼0.6 bar, clouds at equatorial latitudes (27◦S to 5◦N) are uniformly found at deeper altitudes (∼0.5 bar) in- dependent of viewing angle. Our observation that the northern features appear to be at the highest altitudes is consistent with previous authors (e.g. Sromovsky et al. 2001b; Gibbard et al. 2003; Luszcz-Cook 2012). The precise values of the derived northern cloud pressures do not, however, agree with these works, which find them in the strato- sphere at 0.023-0.064 bar. We expect these differ- ences to be related to the limitations of our data (we only have broadband measurements, not spec- tra), differences in the sensitivity of our measure- ments to different altitudes (for example, Gibbard et al. (2003) measures mostly in K'-band, which is not sensitive to altitudes as deep as those we probe in H-band), and the simplicity of our model -- previ- ous studies have favored models with a more com- plicated haze structure and which vary other model parameters (e.g. Baines & Smith 1990; Gibbard et al. 2002; Irwin et al. 2011; Karkoschka & Tomasko 2011; Luszcz-Cook 2012). Our finding that equatorial fea- tures are deepest, while the SPFs in the south are found above them (∼0.3 bar), is different from the results of Gibbard et al. (2003), which suggest a trend of increas- ing altitude with latitude from south to north. How- ever, clouds at these equatorial latitudes were not ob- served at the earlier epoch (see Gibbard et al. (2003)). 4.4 South Polar Features We observe one large bright SPF at 64◦S on 14 July and three smaller SPFs centered at ∼65◦S on 16 July. SPFs near these latitudes have been seen since the Voyager era (e.g. Smith et al. 1989; Hammel et al. 1989b; Limaye & Sromovsky 1991; Sromovsky et al. 1993, 2001c; Rages et al. 2002; Karkoschka 2011a; Martin et al. 2012) although they have displayed a latitudinal shift, mostly occurring at 67-74◦S un- til 2004, and at 60-67◦S since, consistent with our observations (Karkoschka 2011a). Individual SPFs are rapidly-evolving features with well-defined peri- ods that cannot be tracked from one planet rotation to the next, and move through the larger structure of the SPF formation region (e.g. Smith et al. 1989; Limaye & Sromovsky 1991; Sromovsky et al. 1993); these features have been observed to form in a fixed longitude region rotating at nearly the planet inte- rior period (Hammel et al. 1989b) -- that inferred from Voyager's radio data tracking Neptune's magnetic field (Warwick et al. 1989; Lecacheux et al. 1993), then to move East with well-defined periods ranging from 11.7 hr at 74◦S to 13 hr at 68◦S, and dissipate before mov- ing halfway around the planet (Limaye & Sromovsky 1991; Sromovsky et al. 1993). At some times, the SPF region can be completely free of bright cloud features (e.g. Sromovsky et al. 1993; Rages et al. 2002). At some times individual SPFs can sporadically form a cloud clump that can be the brightest feature on the disk, with the brightening lasting only tens of hours or less (Rages et al. 2002; Sromovsky et al. 2001c), as we observe on 14 July. At the beginning of the night on 14 July we observe the large SPF centered at a longitude-latitude position (152◦W, 64◦S) to move with a zonal velocity of 272±15 m/s, consistent with the smooth Voyager wind profile, and a latitudinal speed consistent with zero. At the be- ginning of the night on 16 July we observe three SPFs at centroid positions (130◦W, 67◦S), (119◦W, 63◦S), and (92◦W, 65◦S) all moving with zonal velocities con- sistent with the smooth Voyager wind profile except for the SPF at 63◦S, which moves slower than the smooth Voyager profile by ∆Vlon,σ=70±45 m/s. Two 16 July SPFs are found with significant north-south velocities: the SPF at 67◦S has a northward velocity of 76±43 m/s, and the SPF at 63◦S has a southward velocity of 117±53 m/s. If we extrapolate the zonal drift rate of the 14 July SPF we expect its centroid location at 10:55 on 16 July (UT) to be at a longitude of 40±14◦W, whereas the longitudinal extent of the 16 July SPFs does not reach below ∼80◦W at that time. This strongly suggests that the SPFs observed on the two dates are different features, and that storms develop and decay on timescales of hours to days, consistent with previous observations (e.g. Limaye & Sromovsky 1991; Sromovsky et al. 1993, 2001c; Rages et al. 2002). 9 The dynamics underlying the SPFs have not yet been fully addressed. Sromovsky et al. (1993) found evi- dence for strong convection driving the SPFs. Karkoschka (2011a) found a rotational lock between the SPF for- mation region and the South Polar Wave (SPW), a southern n=1 wave spanning the latitudes 65-55◦S, vis- ible as a dark band in Voyager and HST data (e.g. Smith et al. 1989; Sromovsky et al. 2001a,b). The au- thors suggested that the vertical motions causing the formation of SPFs are dynamically linked to the SPW, and that the SPW itself is vertically phase-locked with the planet interior. The authors indeed used the mo- tions of the SPF formation region and SPW to infer Neptune's rotational period (15.9663±0.0002 hr), dif- ferent from the 16.11 hr period measured using Voy- ager's radio data tracking Neptune's magnetic field (Warwick et al. 1989; Lecacheux et al. 1993). There is still much to be understood about the dynamics of the SPFs, including their temporal variability. 5 Discussion Here we briefly discuss a few mechanisms that can cause dispersion in Neptune's zonal winds which can be ad- dressed by our observations. We then compare the dis- persion observed in H-band on 14 July with that ob- served in K'-band on 16 July. 5.1 Sources of Dispersion We can constrain the contribution of vertical wind shear to the zonal wind dispersion we observe using our re- sults for the cloud-top pressures of features. We find a range in pressures from ∼0.6 bar (at 50◦S) to ∼0.1 bar (northern features), extending approximately 2 scale heights. Voyager IRIS observations of temperature as a function of latitude suggest that at these pressures (30- 1000 mbar) Neptune's vertical wind shear can be on the order of 30 m/s per scale height, with a maximum near the equator (Conrath et al. 1989). For a range in altitudes of 2 scale heights, and assuming that the alti- tudes of observed cloud features are similar to those for which we derive the cloud-top pressures, vertical wind shear should not contribute more than ∼60 m/s to zonal wind dispersion. If we extend this range of depths up to the 2.4 bar bottom cloud we assume in our models and down to 0.02 bar (lower limit for northern features found by Gibbard et al. (2003)), then feature altitudes span no more than ∼5 scale heights. For this range of depths vertical wind shear should not contribute more than ∼150 m/s to zonal wind dispersion. In many cases we see greater dispersion in zonal wind velocities than what is expected from vertical wind shear, even when considering only Low-σrl features, and especially in H- band. Vertical wind shear cannot be the only cause of the dispersion we observe in the zonal velocities. We can more directly limit the relative contribution of vertical wind shear to dispersion we observe in the zonal velocities: Figure 11c shows the cloud-top pres- sures vs. residuals in zonal velocity from the smooth Voyager wind profile, ∆Vlon, of Low-σrl features which were visible in both H- and K'-bands towards the be- ginning of each night, separated into thin latitude bins extending from 32◦S to 28◦N -- where, at these alti- tudes, vertical wind shear is expected to be most im- portant (see Conrath et al. (1989)). Although we do not observe features in any single latitude bin over a wide enough range of pressures to see the vertical wind shear clearly manifest itself given our uncertainties, Fig- ure 11c directly indicates that one or more other mech- anisms dominate over vertical wind shear in producing dispersion in the zonal velocities: there is significant zonal dispersion within latitude bins where features are all estimated to be at about the same pressure (1◦S to 4◦N and 26-28◦N). The zonal dispersion at fixed pressure and at fixed latitudes between 1◦S and 4◦N is greater than even the overall upper limit to zonal wind dispersion we expect from vertical wind shear. Features found at 32-29◦S display the only significant range of pressures (∼0.25-0.45 bar). In this latitude bin we see a spread in zonal velocities significantly greater than what is expected over the range from vertical wind shear (<20 m/s), and we do not observe a trend to- wards higher speed with depth (which at these lati- tudes is toward more negative velocities), as would be expected from vertical wind shear (see Conrath et al. 1989, 1991). Along with significant variation in zonal wind ve- locities at fixed latitude, we also observe some signif- icant north-south feature velocities. Figure 12 shows the derived north-south velocities of Low-σrl features against their latitude positions for both 14 July H- (panel a) and 16 July K'-band (panel b) features. For a few Low-σrl features we find north-south velocities that are convincingly significant, and as high as ∼200 m/s. We find that a few features which display sig- nificant north-south velocities also display significant deviation in zonal velocities from the smooth Voy- ager wind profile. Noting significant examples: the 14 July H-band feature at the equator with residual zonal speed Vlon,σ=480±254 m/s has a southward wind speed 215±85 m/s. A 14 July H-band feature at 7◦N is found with residual zonal speed 180±24 m/s and northward speed 148±15 m/s. We find a 16 July K'- band feature at 37◦S with a northward wind speed of 10 180±45 m/s and a residual zonal speed of 117±80 m/s. Again we note the 16 July SPF at 63◦S with south- ward velocity 117±53 m/s and zonal speed residual 70±45 m/s. Significant north-south velocities and de- viations in zonal velocity from the mean zonal profile indicate the presence of one or more mechanisms which can cause both north-south and east-west residual mo- tions. In particular, although we do not confirm the presence of temporal oscillation in our observations, we cannot rule out vortices causing the dispersion we ob- serve. Cloud features centered on or with motions near a vortex would display significant north-south and east- west temporal oscillations, and if these had sufficiently long periods the motions would appear linear on these timescales, with a slope different from the smooth Voy- ager profile, as we observe. Vortices have often been associated with the dark spots observed on Neptune in Voyager images (such as Voyager GDS and DS2; e.g. Polvani et al. 1990; Sromovsky et al. 1993) and in HST images (such as NGDS-32; e.g. Hammel et al. 1995; Sromovsky et al. 2001b, 2002). The observed dispersion in zonal velocities and sig- nificant north-south velocities imply that we cannot rule out the contribution of wave mechanisms with suf- ficiently long periods, such as Rossby waves. We do not observe the presence of wave mechanisms which oscil- late with periods on the order of our observing period. In particular, we do not observe evidence of tidal forc- ing by Triton, as was suggested by Martin et al. (2012). Even if we were to assume the motions of those features we noted seemed suggestive of east-west temporal os- cillation to be real and not due to error, their periods would not be near the M2 period of tidal forcing by Triton of 7.24 hrs. From ground-based spectroscopic observations prior to the Voyager encounter, Baines & Smith (1990) found evidence that dynamically driven sublimation and con- densation resulting from vertical motions in the at- mosphere are responsible for rapid changes observed in Neptune's clouds. Limaye & Sromovsky (1991) also considered this in the context of the dispersion they observed in the zonal velocities of features in Voyager images. The analysis of Martin et al. (2012) supported this conclusion. The authors noted that if feature ve- locities represent true fluid velocities, for the fluid to remain nearly divergence-free (for sub-sonic flow), the variation they observed in the zonal velocities with east- west distance (>400 m/s over ∼20,000 km) would im- ply large east-west gradients in north-south velocities, which they did not observe, or large vertical motions incompatible with the atmosphere's gradient Richard- son number at the observed altitudes. They therefore confirmed that at least some of the dispersion in zonal velocities they observed is due to transient clouds which do not move with the flow. Our observations also sup- port this result. The spatial distribution of variation in velocities we observe implies that at least some of the dispersion is due to transient clouds, and evidence of cloud motions due to dynamically driven sublima- tion and condensation is provided by our observations of clouds that are very ephemeral and rapidly change morphology. 5.2 Comparing Dispersion The results shown in Figures 9 and 10 are immediately suggestive of an overall difference in the magnitude of dispersion in zonal wind velocities about the smooth Voyager wind profile between features tracked in H- and K'-bands on 14 and 16 July, respectively. Whereas 16 July K'-band features seem to agree reasonably well with the smooth Voyager wind profile, 14 July H-band features appear to show overall greater dispersion and deviation from the smooth Voyager profile. The differ- ence in zonal dispersion and deviation between H- and K'-bands might be expected to be a result of the greater range in altitudes probed in H-band over K'-band. Fea- tures in H-band can be seen down to larger depths than those in K'-band because the strong absorption of H2 and CH4 in K'-band limits detection of features only to higher altitudes (see Luszcz-Cook et al. (2010) Fig. 4). If the difference in zonal velocities is due to the difference in the range of depths probed in H- and K'- bands, then the likely responsible mechanism is vertical wind shear. The effects of vertical wind shear in this difference might be seen in two ways: first, we would expect to see a greater spread in the zonal velocities of features tracked in H-band at fixed latitude; second, and perhaps more subtly, we might expect to see aver- age shifts in the zonal velocities of features between the two bands, consistent with features tracked in H-band on average being at greater depths than those tracked in K'-band. To test the latter of these possibilities we fit Low-σrl Vlon-φ data to a polynomial function of the form Vlon = a + bφ2 + cφ4 to obtain the best-fit values of a, b, and c using a Levenberg-Marquardt method, for comparison with the smooth Voyager wind profile fit of Sromovsky et al. (1993).3 The results of our polyno- mial fits and the 1σ uncertainties (calculated from the variance modified by a factor of the reduced-χ2) are shown with solid and dashed red lines in Figures 9 and 10 and are listed in Table 1, along with the smooth Voy- ager profile fit of Sromovsky et al. (1993). The zonal 3We note that Voyager and HST observations were mainly at visible wavelengths and are probably sensing more deeply than K'-band images. 11 velocities of Low-σrl features measured in K'-band on 16 July agree well with the smooth Voyager wind pro- file (within 1σ), whereas the zonal velocities of Low- σrl features measured in H-band on 14 July are best represented by a profile which is shifted towards more positive velocities by 180±50 m/s. Interestingly, this shift is in the opposite direction from what we would expect due to vertical wind shear. If we assume that most features shown in Figures 9 and 10 are at similar altitudes as those for which we measure the cloud-top pressures, or at least that the zonal direction of the vertical wind shear with pres- sure is the same at the altitudes of these features as those to which the results of Conrath et al. (1989) and Conrath et al. (1991) apply, then as a result of vertical wind shear we would expect a general decay in zonal speed with height. We observe a shift of our 14 July H- band profile fit towards lower zonal speeds (more pos- itive velocities) at latitudes from ∼30◦S-30◦N, where the results of Conrath et al. (1989) and Conrath et al. (1991) show the vertical wind shear is most important, and where features that most strongly drive the offset in our profile fit are found. The shift in our profile fit is in the direction we would expect if 14 July H-band features were on average found at higher altitudes than K'-band features. The effects of vertical wind shear are not found in differences in the average zonal velocities of 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features. We note for clarity that we do not interpret differences in our pro- file fits to the latitudinal distribution of zonal velocities of Low-σrl features as evidence for a consistent change in Neptune's mean zonal wind profile from the smooth Voyager wind profile -- the short observing times and latitude gaps in our data make it ill-suited to yield ev- idence for such a claim. In what follows we continue to interpret the smooth Voyager wind profile as describing Neptune's mean zonal wind profile. If vertical wind shear were the cause of the apparent difference in zonal dispersion and deviation between 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features then we would also expect: 1) greater spread in 14 July H-band fea- ture zonal velocities over that of 16 July K'-band fea- ture zonal velocities at fixed latitude; 2) greater devi- ation from the smooth Voyager wind profile of 14 July H-band feature zonal velocities over that of 16 July K'- band feature zonal velocities at fixed latitude (and this difference in deviation would be fully accounted for by the difference in spread in zonal velocities); 3) differ- ences in the deviation and spread in zonal velocities would not exceed the upper limits we expect for disper- sion in the zonal velocities due to vertical wind shear (Section 5.1). To explore this we do the following: we separate ∆Vlon for 14 July H- (squares) and 16 July K'- band (triangles) Low-σrl features (shown in Figure 13a) into latitude bins (shaded bars) chosen according to the latitude bands along which features are observed to be centered (see Figure 1). In each of these latitude bins we compute a weighted average of the absolute value of residuals in zonal velocity of Low-σrl features from the smooth Voyager wind profile, mean ∆Vlon, com- paring features tracked in H- and K'-bands on 14 and 16 July, respectively (we do not consider uncertainty in the smooth Voyager profile in this calculation, and so these results are useful mainly as a comparison between 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features). The results are shown in Figure 13b. On average, 14 July H-band features show greater deviation from the smooth Voy- ager wind profile than K'-band features, and especially at equatorial and southern mid-latitudes. To directly examine differences in the dispersion in zonal velocity, within each latitude bin where two or more Low-σrl features are found, we compute the dif- ference between the fastest and slowest Low-σrl zonal velocities, max δVlon ≡ (max Vlon − min Vlon), compar- ing between 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features. This is shown in Figure 13c. In many latitude bins uncertainties in the zonal velocities are too large to de- termine whether or not differences in mean ∆Vlon be- tween 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features can be fully accounted for by differences in their max δVlon. Only in the bin of features centered at 30◦S is there a significant difference in max δVlon that can fully ac- count for a corresponding significant difference in mean ∆Vlon. However, our comparison in Figure 13 is still useful for making statements about the relative con- tribution of vertical wind shear to differences in the dispersion in zonal velocities: there are differences in max δVlon between Low-σrl 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features in latitude bins centered at 45◦S and 23◦S that are much greater than overall upper lim- its to dispersion we expect from vertical wind shear. These indicate the dominance of one or more mecha- nisms other than vertical wind shear causing differences in the dispersion in zonal velocities between 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features at these latitudes. Max- imum possible difference in max δVlon in the latitude bin centered at 37◦S cannot account for the difference in mean ∆Vlon in the same latitude bin; the maxi- mum possible increase in max δVlon of these 14 July H-band features over that of 16 July K'-band features (calculated at opposite extremes of their uncertainties) is 172 m/s, whereas 14 July H-band features at these latitudes display mean ∆Vlon greater than that ob- served for 16 July K'-band features by >250 m/s. If we assume that mechanisms which cause deviation in zonal velocities from the smooth Voyager wind profile are similarly capable of causing dispersion in zonal ve- locities, this also indicates the presence of a mechanism 12 Data Voyager 14 July H-Band 16 July K'-Band Constant Term (m/s) -398±12 -205±49 -387±37 φ2 Term (m/s/deg2) 0.188±0.014 0.083±0.06 0.165±0.041 φ4 Term (m/s/deg4) -1.2E-5±0.3E-5 7.0E-6±14.0E-6 -1.3E-5±1.1E-5 Table 1 Polynomial fits to feature zonal velocities vs. latitudes and their 1σ uncertainties. other than vertical wind shear which causes differences in the dispersion in zonal velocities of 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features. Our observations indicate the dominance of one or more mechanisms over vertical wind shear in produc- ing the overall dispersion we observe in the zonal winds. That the difference in deviation and dispersion in zonal velocities observed between 14 July H- and 16 July K'- band features is, at least at most latitudes between ∼50-20◦S, not primarily attributable to vertical wind shear further suggests that the mechanisms which dom- inate dispersion in the zonal winds can cause changes in the magnitude of dispersion and deviation in the zonal winds on timescales of hours to days. This is consistent with the mechanisms discussed above. 6 Summary and Conclusions In this study we tracked the longitude-latitude positions of Neptune's atmospheric features seen in Keck AO im- ages in H-band on 14 July 2009 and in K'-band on 16 July 2009 over time. We derived zonal and latitudinal drift rates and velocities for these features. We also performed radiative transfer modeling for features on both nights which were simultaneously visible in both H- and K'-bands. The results we find are the following: 1. We find significant dispersion in the zonal velocities of Neptune's cloud features about the smooth Voy- ager wind profile of Sromovsky et al. (1993), with the largest dispersion seen at equatorial and south- ern mid-latitudes. The observed dispersion is much greater than the upper limit we expect due to verti- cal wind shear. Considering only Low-σrl features: deviation in zonal velocity from the smooth Voy- ager wind profile is found as high as 290±77 m/s (at the equator) among features tracked in K'-band on 16 July, and as high as ∼500 m/s among features tracked in H-band on 14 July (although uncertainties for these measurements are as high as 25% at 23◦S and 50% at the equator). Comparison of the zonal velocities and cloud-top pressures of features at fixed latitude also directly indicates the dominance of one or more mechanisms over vertical wind shear in pro- ducing dispersion in the zonal winds. Some features display significant north-south velocities (as high as ∼200 m/s), and a few of these also display significant deviation in zonal velocity from the smooth Voy- ager wind profile. This suggests that zonal disper- sion is partially due to a mechanism which can pro- duce residual motion along both directions, such as vortices and wave mechanisms with sufficiently long periods so as to appear linear on these timescales, such as Rossby waves. Our observations are consis- tent with the result that zonal dispersion is caused at least in part by transient clouds due to dynamically driven sublimation and condensation. 2. Radiative transfer modeling indicates that, aside from one feature at 50◦S found at ∼0.6 bar, cloud features at equatorial latitudes (∼5◦S-5◦N and 27◦S- 15◦S) uniformly lie deeper in the atmosphere (∼0.5 bar) while clouds in the north (above 20◦N) are found at higher altitudes (∼0.1-0.2 bar). Due to limitations of our data, differences in the sensitivity of our measurements to different altitudes, and the simplicity of our model, the precise altitudes we mea- sure for the northern features are different from the results of previous studies, which place them higher, in the stratosphere. 3. We observe one large SPF at 64◦S on 14 July and three smaller SPFs centered at about the same lat- itude on 16 July. Two 16 July SPFs display sig- nificant north-south velocities, and that with the largest north-south speed (117±53 m/s southward) also shows significant deviation from the smooth Voyager wind profile (70±45 m/s slower). Extrap- olation of the zonal drift rate of the 14 July SPF and comparison with the average position and spa- tial extent of the 16 July SPFs shows that the SPFs observed on the two nights are different features, indicating that storms can develop and decay on timescales of hours to days, in agreement with pre- vious observations. 4. There is greater dispersion and deviation observed in the zonal velocities of features tracked in H-band on 14 July than in those tracked in K'-band on 16 July. Polynomial fits to the zonal velocities vs. latitudes of our data show that while 16 July K'-band feature zonal velocities agree well with the smooth Voyager wind profile, 14 July H-band feature zonal velocities are best described by a profile that is shifted to- ward more positive velocities by 180±50 m/s. This shift is in the opposite direction from what we would 13 expect if differences in the deviation in zonal veloc- ities from the smooth Voyager wind profile between 14 July H-band and 16 July K'-band features were due to vertical wind shear, as a result of greater av- erage depth of features tracked in H-band. Direct comparison suggests that the difference in deviation and dispersion in zonal velocities between 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band features at fixed latitude is not primarily attributable to vertical wind shear. This further suggests that mechanisms other than vertical wind shear which dominate dispersion in the zonal winds can cause changes in the magnitude of dis- persion and deviation in the zonal winds about the mean zonal wind profile on timescales of hours to days. The authors would like to thank Adam Becker for useful discussions. This research has been supported in part by the National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center for Adaptive Optics, managed by the University of California at Santa Cruz under coop- erative agreement No. AST 9876783, as well as by NSF Grant AST-0908575 to the University of California. The data presented here were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific part- nership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California and the National Aeronau- tics and Space Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation. The authors extend special thanks to those of Hawaiian ancestry on whose sacred mountain we are privileged to be guests. Without their generous hospitality, none of the observations presented would have been possible. 14 Fig. 1 Neptune H- (left column) and K'-band (right column) images taken on 14 July 2009 (top two rows) and 16 July 2009 (bottom two rows) towards the beginning (first and third rows) and end (second and fourth rows) of each night. Images are shown in units of I/F according to the scale shown in the colorbars to the right of the topmost images in each filter. For comparison, to the left of the 14 July H-band image taken at 11:20 (UT) (top left panel) we show the same image with overlayed lines of constant latitude (lines are shown at 60◦S, 30◦S, the equator, and 30◦N) and longitude (a line is shown at the sub-observer longitude). The sub-observer longitudes of navigated images are indicated in the bottom right corners of panels. 15 Fig. 2 Mean averaged, high-pass filtered H- (panel a) and K'-band (panel b) images. H-band image is averaged from the full stack of aligned images from 2009 14 July 11:20:21 - 13:47:44 (UT), and K'-band image is averaged from the stack of aligned images from 2009 16 July 10:54:57 - 14:20:09 (UT). Color dashed lines indicate the derived apparent orbits of Galatea (green), Larissa (red), and Despina (orange) in each image. In K'-band Proteus (yellow) is also indicated. These align well with the true traced moon orbits in each image. 16 Fig. 3 Transformed image, taken in H-band on 2009 July 14 12:50:29 (UT). 17 Fig. 4 Transformed averaged images in strips of fixed latitude (52◦S-30◦S) stacked vertically with ascending time. Vertical axis indicates the exposure time of the first of the five images composing the averaged image. Repeating horizontal red lines mark the boundaries between successive image strips. Blue dashed lines indicate representative features which are relatively consistent in brightness and morphology while yellow dashed lines indicate representative features which are more ephemeral and change morphology more significantly and rapidly. 18 ' 1 K ' ' 1 H ' Fig. 5 Transformed averaged images in strips of fixed latitude -- identified at the top of each column -- stacked vertically with ascending time. Vertical axis indicates the exposure time of the first of the five images composing the averaged image. Second (fourth) column shows a zoomed-in image of the feature shown in the first (third) column, with contour lines at 60% (blue), 70% (green), and 80% (red) the maximum feature intensity, and our derived feature center indicated to illustrate our feature tracking method. Identifying names are shown above the second and fourth columns in order to easily indicate these features in Figures 6 and 7. 19 Fig. 6 20 H1 Fig. 6 Derived zonal drift rates (solid lines and dotted lines) from the longitude positions versus times of each feature tracked in H-band images on 14 July, from 11:20-13:47 (UT), separated into latitude bins indicated at the top of each panel. Time is measured in minutes relative to 2009 July 14 11:20:20 (UT). Zonal drift rates expected at the latitude of each feature according to the smooth Voyager wind profile are shown for comparison (dashed lines). Features are separated by the mean of their absolute residuals in measured longitude position about their derived zonal drift rates: High-σrl (red) and Low-σrl (blue). The feature identified as 'H1' in Figure 5 is indicated. Significant dispersion about the smooth Voyager wind profile is observed, even for Low-σrl features. 21 Fig. 7 22 K1 Fig. 7 Same as Figure 6, now for features tracked in K'-band images on 16 July from 10:54-14:20 (UT). Time is measured in minutes relative to 2009 July 16 10:54:57 (UT). The feature identified as 'K1' in Figure 5 is indicated. Significant dispersion about the smooth Voyager wind profile is observed in K'-band on 16 July, even for Low-σrl features. 23 Fig. 8 Distribution of the mean of absolute residuals in measured longitude position about the derived zonal drift rates of features, σrl. Our two classifications are shown separated by a vertical dashed line: Low-σrl (σrl ≤ 0.7 deg) and High-σrl (σrl > 0.7 deg). 24 ∆ Vlon, σ ∆ Vlon Fig. 9 Derived zonal velocities of 14 July H-band Low-σrl features shown against the smooth Voyager wind profile (black solid line). The width of uncertainty in the smooth Voyager wind profile is shown with black dashed lines. The length of time over which each feature was tracked is indicated by the size of the square in which each feature's zonal velocity is plotted. Square sizes corresponding to the shortest and longest tracking times are shown in the bottom left corner. There is significant deviation and dispersion in the zonal velocities from the smooth Voyager wind profile, greater than what is observed on 16 July in K'-band. Our polynomial fit to the zonal velocities vs. latitudes of Low-σrl features is shown with a red solid line, and the widths of uncertainty of our fit are shown with red dashed lines. Our polynomial fit is listed in Table 1 along with the smooth Voyager profile fit of Sromovsky et al. (1993), for comparison. Our polynomial fit to the 14 July H-band feature zonal velocity distribution deviates significantly from the smooth Voyager wind profile, with a shift toward more positive velocities of 180±50 m/s. A graphical illustration of our two definitions of deviation in the zonal velocities, ∆Vlon,σ (red "fake" features) and ∆Vlon (black "fake" features), is shown in the top legend. Green lines illustrate positive values of deviation while yellow lines indicate negative values of deviation, according to the definition of each quantity. 25 Fig. 10 Same as Figure 9, now showing the derived zonal speeds of 16 July K'-band Low-σrl features against the smooth Voyager wind profile (black solid line). There is significant deviation and dispersion in zonal velocities from the smooth Voyager wind profile. 16 July K'-band feature zonal velocities agree well (within 1σ) with the smooth Voyager wind profile in their polynomial fit (red solid line). 26 Fig. 11 a) cloud-top pressures versus latitudes of features seen in both H- and K'-bands on 14 and 16 July. Features are shown in separate bins of the cosine of emission angle, µ, by the color and symbol in which they are plotted, as indicated in the bottom left corner of the panel. b) cloud-top pressures versus µ of features shown in separate bins of latitude by the color and symbol in which they are plotted, as indicated in the bottom left corner of the panel. Aside from one feature at 50◦S, equatorial features are uniformly deeper while features in the north are found at higher altitudes. c) the cloud-top pressures vs. residuals in zonal velocity from the smooth Voyager wind profile, ∆Vlon, of features for which we were able to make both measurements, from 32◦S to 28◦N (where vertical wind shear is expected to be important) in thin bins of latitude. Symbol size indicates the length of time over which a feature was tracked, increasing linearly from the shortest to the longest tracking times indicated in the bottom right corner of the panel. Squares are used to represent features whose velocities were obtained by tracking positions in 14 July H-band images and triangles are used to represent features whose velocities were obtained by tracking positions in 16 July K'-band images. 27 Fig. 12 Derived north-south wind speeds Vlat versus mean latitude positions of 14 July H- (panel a) and 16 July K'-band (panel b) Low-σrl features. Length of time over which features were tracked is indicated by the size of the symbol in which they are plotted, increasing linearly from the shortest to longest tracking times indicated in each panel. 28 Fig. 13 a) residuals in zonal velocity from the smooth Voyager wind profile, ∆Vlon, for H- (squares) and K'-band (triangles) Low-σrl features. Length of time over which features were tracked is indicated by the symbol size in which each feature is plotted, increasing linearly from the shortest to the longest tracking times in each filter, as indicated in the panel. Latitude bins in which we average the absolute residuals in zonal velocity of features are indicated by shaded bars. b) the mean absolute residuals in zonal velocity from the smooth Voyager wind profile, mean ∆Vlon, averaged in the latitude bins indicated, for 14 July H- and 16 July K'-band Low-σrl features. Symbol size indicates the number of features composing the mean average, increasing linearly with the number of features. H-band features on average show greater deviation from the smooth Voyager wind profile. c) Differences between the maximum and minimum zonal velocities of Low-σrl features within each latitude bin (where two or more features are found in each filter), max δVlon. 2 9 Latitude (deg) -64.3±.7 -48.0±.9 -45.7±.5 -45.5±.3 -44.0±.6 -42.9±.3 -38.0±.8 -35.0±.8 -30.8±.9 -30.6±.7 -30.5±.7 -23.8±.2 -22.7±.6 -22.5±.5 -1.4±.3 -1.1±.5 -0.2±.5 2.8±.8 6.8±.1 14.4±.3 19.1±.4 19.8±.9 29.9±.8 30.0±.5 41.0±.1 dφ/dt (deg/hr) 5.22±0.28 -0.18±0.23 -5.51±1.20 -1.24±0.20 4.12±1.21 -1.07±0.14 1.41±0.16 -0.32±0.55 -1.29±0.10 -0.73±0.37 1.46±0.29 -2.11±0.14 -7.69±1.16 -6.26±0.95 -7.42±2.12 -2.63±0.72 -0.86±0.26 -1.79±0.14 -1.64±0.20 -1.65±0.65 -3.54±0.34 -1.38±0.31 -1.18±0.13 -0.13±0.32 0.50±1.04 Vlon (m/s) ∆Vlon,σ (m/s) 272±15 -15±19 -462±101 -105±17 356±105 -94±13 133±15 -31±54 -133±11 -75±38 151±30 -232±15 -852±129 -694±105 -891±254 -316±87 -103±31 -215±17 -196±24 -191±76 -401±38 -156±35 -123±13 -13±33 45±95 -22±15 -46±19 350±101 -10±17 385±105 -46±13 246±15 121±54 69±11 129±38 357±30 42±15 527±129 369±105 481±254 69±87 283±31 170±17 181±24 153±76 53±38 152±35 90±13 198±33 117±95 dθ/dt (deg/hr) 0.09±0.10 0.24±0.09 -0.67±0.57 -0.53±0.05 -1.30±0.86 -0.03±0.04 0.18±0.12 -0.55±0.17 -0.31±0.08 0.26±0.07 0.09±0.10 -0.47±0.12 -0.79±0.88 0.64±0.27 -1.82±0.72 -0.39±0.43 0.40±0.20 0.28±0.12 1.26±0.13 -0.20±0.40 -0.11±0.28 0.17±0.26 0.50±0.21 0.54±0.33 -1.17±1.14 Vlat (m/s) 11±12 28±10 -79±68 -63±6 -154±103 -4±5 21±14 -66±20 -37±9 31±8 11±12 -56±14 -93±105 75±32 -215±85 -46±51 47±23 33±14 148±15 -23±47 -13±33 20±30 59±24 64±40 -139±135 σrl (deg) ∆t (min) Nmeas 0.46 0.39 0.21 0.25 0.16 0.27 0.25 0.38 0.17 0.61 0.36 0.19 0.20 0.24 0.53 0.19 0.39 0.23 0.35 0.09 0.50 0.25 0.19 0.42 0.38 139 139 33 139 24 139 123 91 139 139 139 139 33 41 41 41 139 139 139 33 139 91 139 139 74 15 15 5 15 4 15 13 9 15 15 15 15 5 6 6 6 15 15 15 5 15 9 15 15 7 Table 2 Table of various values for Low-σrl features tracked in H-band on 14 July. Definitions of most quantities are given throughout the text. ∆t is the length of time over which each feature was tracked, and Nmeas is the number of images in which each feature was measured. For a description of the quantity ∆Vlon,σ see footnote 2. Latitude (deg) -67.0±.5 -65.7±.4 -63.3±.6 -47.7±.9 -45.8±.9 -38.0±.2 -37.0±.6 -36.9±.1 -30.2±.1 -30.0±.4 -30.0±.5 -29.8±.2 -29.7±.1 -28.8±.1 -24.4±.4 -24.2±.1 -1.2±.4 0.6±.4 1.1±.4 1.1±.3 1.1±.2 3.7±.8 6.7±.5 29.4±.2 29.7±.6 29.9±.1 30.2±.8 39.1±.40 41.4±.7 dφ/dt (deg/hr) 3.50±0.84 2.84±0.89 -0.42±0.84 -0.95±0.05 -3.35±0.32 -2.49±5.34 -3.31±0.84 -2.30±0.23 -2.64±0.67 -3.48±0.16 -3.45±0.37 -2.37±0.11 -1.28±0.10 -3.30±0.73 -2.15±0.29 -2.39±1.94 -5.27±4.85 -5.83±0.64 -4.80±0.26 -2.83±0.68 -2.09±0.30 -2.92±0.22 -3.87±0.17 -0.40±0.49 -2.30±0.34 -2.70±0.44 -3.74±3.50 -2.04±0.13 -1.61±0.78 Vlon (m/s) ∆Vlon,σ (m/s) 164±39 140±44 -22±45 -77±4 -281±27 -235±505 -317±81 -221±22 -274±70 -361±17 -359±38 -247±11 -133±11 -347±76 -235±32 -262±212 -632±582 -700±77 -576±31 -340±82 -251±37 -350±26 -461±21 -41±51 -240±35 -282±45 -388±363 -190±13 -145±70 -95±39 -78±44 69±45 -15±4 169±27 45±505 117±81 20±22 10±70 96±17 93±38 -20±11 81±11 71±76 33±32 8±212 223±582 290±77 166±31 46±82 135±37 33±26 59±21 177±51 -25±35 15±45 125±363 12±13 -11±70 dθ/dt (deg/hr) 0.63±0.36 0.03±0.31 -0.98±0.44 0.08±0.04 -0.61±0.05 0.26±0.42 1.52±0.37 1.07±0.11 0.20±0.59 -0.1±0.15 0.42±0.15 0.15±0.07 0.32±0.05 -0.1±0.14 -0.86±0.24 0.02±0.15 0.95±0.28 -0.60±0.52 -0.17±0.17 0.07±0.42 0.10±0.62 0.48±0.12 0.12±0.06 0.32±0.28 0.49±0.09 0.01±0.21 0.51±2.48 0.05±0.15 -0.05±1.03 Vlat (m/s) 76±43 3±38 -117±53 9±5 -72±6 31±50 181±44 127±13 24±70 -12±18 50±18 17±9 39±6 -12±17 -101±29 2±17 112±33 -70±62 -20±20 8±50 12±73 56±14 14±7 38±33 58±11 1±25 61±294 6±17 -6±123 σrl (deg) ∆t (min) Nmeas 0.17 0.34 0.16 0.15 0.21 0.14 0.15 0.09 0.05 0.32 0.16 0.37 0.25 0.15 0.20 0.16 0.47 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.05 0.14 0.34 0.11 0.15 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.14 36 67 36 198 89 36 28 67 21 149 67 198 198 36 82 21 23 28 67 36 28 82 149 36 74 36 23 149 36 6 7 6 21 10 6 5 7 4 18 7 21 21 6 9 4 4 5 7 6 5 9 18 6 8 6 4 18 6 Table 3 Table of various values for Low-σrl features tracked in K'-band on 16 July. Definitions of most quantities are given throughout the text. ∆t is the length of time over which each feature was tracked, and Nmeas is the number of images in which each feature was measured. For a description of the quantity ∆Vlon,σ see footnote 2. 0 3 31 References Allison, M., Ferguson, J.W.: Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 2269 (1990) Asay-Davis, X.S., Marcus, P.S., Wong, M.H., de Pater, I.: Icarus 203, 164 (2009) Baines, K.H., Smith, H.Wm.: Icarus 85, 65 (1990) Baines, K.H., Mickelson, M.E., Larson, L.E., Ferguson, D.W.: Icarus 114, 328 (1995) Borysow, J., Trafton, L., Frommhold, L., Birnbaum, G.: Astrophys. J. 296, 644 (1985) Karkoschka, E.: Icarus 215, 759 (2011b) Karkoschka, E.: Icarus 215, 439 (2011a) Lecacheux, A.,Zarka, Ph.,Desch, M.D.,Evans, D.R.: Geo- phys. Res. Lett. 20, 2711 (1993) Lii, P.S., Wong, M.H., de Pater, I.: Icarus 209, 591 (2010) Limaye, S.S., Sromovsky, L.A.: J. Geophys. Res. 96, 18941 (1991) Lindal, G.F., Lyons, J.R., Sweetnam, D.N., Eshleman, V.R., Hinson, D.P., Tyler, G.L.: Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 22, 1106 (1990) Luszcz-Cook, S.H., de Pater, I., ´Ad´amkovics, M., Ham- Borysow, J., Frommhold, L., Birnbaum, G.: Astrophys. J. mel, H.B.: Icarus 208, 938 (2010) 326, 509 (1988) Borysow, A.: Icarus 92, 273 (1991) Borysow, A.: Icarus 96, 169 (1992) Borysow, A.: Icarus 106, 614 (1993) Colina, L., Bohlin, R.C., Castelli, F.: Astron. J. 112, 307 (1996) Conrath, B., Flasar, F.M., Hanel, R., Kunde, V., Maguire, W., Pearl, J., Pirraglia, J., Samuelson, R., Cruik- shank, D., Horn, L.: Science 246, 1454 (1989) Conrath, B.J., Flasar, F.M., Gierasch, P.J.: J. Geophys. Res. 96, 18931 (1991) Luszcz-Cook, S. 2012, "Millimeter and Near-Infrared Obser- vations of Neptune's Atmospheric Dynamics", PhD The- sis, University of California, Berkeley Martin, S.C., de Pater, I., Marcus, P.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 337, 65 (2012) Max, C.E., Macintosh, B.A., Gibbard, S.G., Gavel, D.T., Roe, H.G., de Pater, I., Ghez, A.M., Acton, D.S., Lai, O., Stomski, P., Wizinowich, P.L.: Astron. J. 125, 364 (2003) Mitchell, J.L., ´Ad´amkovics, M., Caballero, R., Turtle, E.P.: Nat. Geo. 4, 589 (2011) Polvani, L.M., Wisdom, J., Dejong, E., Ingersoll, A.P.: Sci- Conrath, B.J., Gautier, D., Owen, T.C., Samuelson, R.E.: ence 249, 1393 (1990) Pravdo, S.H., Shaklan, S.B., Wiktorowicz, S.J., Kulka- rni, S., Lloyd, J.P., Martinache, F., Tuthill, P.G., Ire- land, M.J.: Astrophys. J. 649, 389 (2006) Rages, K., Hammel, H.B., Lockwood, G.W.: Icarus 159, 262 (2002) Smith, B.A., et al.: Science 246, 1422 (1989) Sromovsky, L.A., Limaye, S.S., Fry, P.M.: Icarus 105, 140 (1993) Sromovsky, L.A., Limaye, S.S., Fry, P.M.: Icarus 118, 25 (1995) Sromovsky, L.A., Fry, P.M., Baines, K.H., Dowling, T.E.: Icarus 149, 435 (2001a) Sromovsky, L.A., Fry, P.M., Dowling, T.E., Baines, K.H., Limaye, S.S.: Icarus 149, 459 (2001b) Sromovsky, L.A., Fry, P.M., Dowling, T.E., Baines, K.H., Limaye, S.S.: Icarus 150, 244 (2001c) Sromovsky, L.A., Fry, P.M., Baines, K.H.: Icarus 156, 16 (2002) Sromovsky, L.A., Fry, P.M., Boudon, V., Campargue, A., Nikitin, A.: Icarus 218, 1 (2012) Stone, E.C., Miner, E.D.: Science 246, 1417 (1989) van Dam, M.A., Le Mignant, D., Macintosh, B.A.: Proc. SPIE 5490, 174 (2004) Warwick, J.W., et al.: Science 246, 1498 (1989) Icarus 101, 168 (1993) Crisp, D., Trauger, J., Stapelfeldt, K., Brooke, T., Clarke, J., Ballester, G., Evans, R., WFPC2 Science Team: Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 26, 1093 (1994) de Pater, I., Gibbard, S.G., Chiang, E., Hammel, H.B., Mac- intosh, B., Marchis, F., Martin, S.C., Roe, H.G., Showal- ter, M.: Icarus 174, 263 (2005) Fletcher, L.N., Drossart, P., Burgdorf, M., Orton, G.S., En- crenaz, T.: Astron. Astrophys. 514, A17 (2010) Gibbard, S.G., Roe, H., de Pater, I., Macintosh, B., Icarus Gavel, D., Max, C.E., Baines, K.H., Ghez, A.: 156, 1 (2002) Gibbard, S.G., de Pater, I., Roe, H.G., Martin, S., Macin- tosh, B.A., Max, C.E.: Icarus 166, 359 (2003) Hammel, H.B.: Icarus 80, 14 (1989) Hammel, H.B., Baines, K.H., Bergstrahl, J.T.: Icarus 80, 416 (1989a) Hammel, H.B., Beebe, R.F., de Jong, E.M., Hansen, C.J., Howell, C.D., Ingersoll, A.P., Johnson, T.V., Limaye, S.S., Magalhaes, J.A., Pollack, J.B., Sromovsky, L.A., Suomi, V.E., Swift, C.E.: Science 245, 1367 (1989b) Hammel, H.B., Lockwood, G.J., Mills, J.R., Barnet, C.D.: Science 268, 1740 (1995) Hammel, H.B., Lockwood, G.W.: Icarus 129, 466 (1997) Hammel, H.B., Sitko, M.L., Lynch, D.K., Orton, G.S., Rus- sell, R.W., Geballe, T.R., de Pater, I.: Astron. J. 134, 637 (2007) Hansen, J.E., Pollack, J.B.: J. Atmos. Sci. 27, 265 (1970) Hueso, R., Legarreta, J., Rojas, J.F., Peralta, J., P´erez- Hoyos, S., del R´ıo-Gaztelurrutia, T., S´anchez-Lavega, A.: Adv. Spac. Res. 46, 1120 (2010) Irwin, P.G.J., Teanby, N.A., Davis, G.R., Fletcher, L.N., Orton, G.S., Tice, D., Hurley, J., Calcutt, S.B.: Icarus 216, 141 (2011) Jacobsen, R.A., Owen, Jr., W.M.: Astron. J. 128, 1412 (2004) Karkoschka, E., Tomasko, M.G.: Icarus 211, 780 (2011) This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
1507.02388	2	1507	2015-07-13T03:06:02	A Venus-Mass Planet Orbiting a Brown Dwarf: Missing Link between Planets and Moons	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The co-planarity of solar-system planets led Kant to suggest that they formed from an accretion disk, and the discovery of hundreds of such disks around young stars as well as hundreds of co-planar planetary systems by the Kepler satellite demonstrate that this formation mechanism is extremely widespread. Many moons in the solar system, such as the Galilean moons of Jupiter, also formed out of the accretion disks that coalesced into the giant planets. We report here the discovery of an intermediate system OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LB/Bb composed of a Venus-mass planet orbiting a brown dwarf, which may be viewed either as a scaled down version of a planet plus star or as a scaled up version of a moon plus planet orbiting a star. The latter analogy can be further extended since they orbit in the potential of a larger, stellar body. For ice-rock companions formed in the outer parts of accretion disks, like Uranus and Callisto, the scaled masses and separations of the three types of systems are similar, leading us to suggest that formation processes of companions within accretion disks around stars, brown dwarfs, and planets are similar.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	DRAFT VERSION APRIL 2, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 A VENUS-MASS PLANET ORBITING A BROWN DWARF: MISSING LINK BETWEEN PLANETS AND MOONS A. UDALSKI1, Y. K. JUNG2, C. HAN2,∗, A. GOULD3, S. KOZŁOWSKI1, J. SKOWRON1, R. POLESKI1,3, I. SOSZY ´NSKI1, P. PIETRUKOWICZ1, P. MRÓZ1, M. K. SZYMA ´NSKI1, Ł. WYRZYKOWSKI1, K. ULACZYK1, G. PIETRZY ´NSKI1, Y. SHVARTZVALD4, D. MAOZ4, S. KASPI4, B. S. GAUDI3, K.-H. HWANG2, J.-Y. CHOI2, I.-G. SHIN2, H. PARK2, V. BOZZA5,6 1Warsaw University Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warszawa, Poland 2Department of Physics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 371-763, Republic of Korea 3Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 W. 18th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA 4School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel 5Dipartimento di Fisica "E.R. Caianiello", Università di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084, Fisciano (SA), Italy 6Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli, Via Cinthia 9, 80126 Napoli, Italy and ∗Corresponding author Draft version April 2, 2018 ABSTRACT The co-planarity of solar-system planets led Kant to suggest that they formed from an accretion disk, and the discovery of hundreds of such disks around young stars as well as hundreds of co-planar planetary systems by the Kepler satellite demonstrate that this formation mechanism is extremely widespread. Many moons in the solar system, such as the Galilean moons of Jupiter, also formed out of the accretion disks that coalesced into the giant planets. We report here the discovery of an intermediate system OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LB/Bb composed of a Venus-mass planet orbiting a brown dwarf, which may be viewed either as a scaled down version of a planet plus star or as a scaled up version of a moon plus planet orbiting a star. The latter analogy can be further extended since they orbit in the potential of a larger, stellar body. For ice-rock companions formed in the outer parts of accretion disks, like Uranus and Callisto, the scaled masses and separations of the three types of systems are similar, leading us to suggest that formation processes of companions within accretion disks around stars, brown dwarfs, and planets are similar. Subject headings: planetary systems – brown dwarfs – gravitational lensing: micro 1. INTRODUCTION Brown dwarfs are intermediate in mass between stars and planets, making them important laboratories for test- ing theories about both classes of objects, including theo- ries about atmospheres, binarity, and formation mechanism. Brown dwarfs are also potentially a laboratory to test the- ories of planet formation, but detecting planets that orbit brown dwarfs is challenging. Four super-Jupiter planets or- biting brown dwarfs have been detected to date by three tech- niques: direct-imaging (Chauvin et al. 2004; Todorov et al. 2010), radial-velocity (Joergens & Müller 2007), and mi- crolensing (Han et al. 2013). In the first three cases, the super- Jupiter planet was within a decade in mass of its host and well separated from it, suggesting that these systems more resem- ble scaled down binary stars than they do the extreme mass- ratio systems that are likely to emerge from accretion disks. In the fourth case, the separation was substantially closer and the mass ratio somewhat more pronounced so that the planet could have formed through the core-accretion scenario that is thought to be the origin of the solar system's gas giants. With present technology, substantially lower-mass compan- ions to brown dwarfs, composed primarily of ice and rock, can only be discovered using the gravitational microlensing technique. Microlensing does not rely on light from either the host or planet, but rather infers the existence and properties of these bodies from their deflection and magnification of light from a more distant star that is fortuitously aligned with the system. As such, the low-luminosity of the brown dwarf and almost complete absence of light from its low-mass compan- ion do not interfere in any way with the discovery process. In this paper, we report the microlensing discovery of an in- termediate system OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LB/Bb composed of a Venus-mass planet orbiting a brown dwarf. The system may be viewed either as a scaled down version of a planet plus star or as a scaled up version of a moon plus planet orbit- ing a star, suggesting that formation processes of companions within accretion disks around stars, brown dwarfs, and planets may be similar. 2. OBSERVATION Microlensing event OGLE-2013-BLG-0723 was discov- ered by the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE-IV) (Udalski et al. 2015) on May 12, 2013 (HJD ∼ 2456424.5) using its 1.3m Warsaw telescope at the Las Cam- panas Observatory in Chile. At (α, δ)J2000=(17h34m40s.51, - 27◦26′53′′ .2) [(l,b) = (- 0◦.02,2◦.83)], the event lies in one of nine fields toward the Galactic bulge that OGLE observes & 1 hr- 1, which is sufficient cadence to discover terrestrial planets. In fact, the discovery was triggered by a short ∼ 1 day, ∼ 40% brightening of the lensing event that was still in progress at the time of the announcement (Figure 1, left inset), and which was soon suggested to be of planetary ori- gin. Hence, when the event underwent a second much larger (factor 10) anomalous brightening 49 days later, OGLE im- mediately recognized that it would be crucial to fully charac- terize this second anomaly. In particular, since such violent brightening is always caused by the source entering a "caus- tic" (closed curve of formally infinite magnification – see Fig- ure 2), a caustic exit was inevitable. Because these caustic crossings typically last only an hour or so and can occur at any time during the day, OGLE contacted the Microlensing Follow Up Network (µFUN) which operates a global network of narrow-angle telescopes capable of near 24-hour monitor- ing of individually important events. With the aid of real-time 2 FIG. 1.- Light curve of the microlensing event OGLE-2013-BLG-0723, including models with and without the planet. Left inset shows the planetary anomaly, which includes not just the obvious spike, but also a more extended low level depression. Right inset shows dense coverage of caustic exit, which permitted measurement of the Einstein radius θE. modeling that accurately predicted the time of the exit, the Wise Observatory 0.46m telescope at Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, obtained dense coverage of this exit (Figure 1, right inset). underestimated, the error bars are readjusted by e = k(e2 0 min)1/2, + e2 (1) where emin is a term used to make the cumulative distribution function of χ2 as a function of lensing magnification becomes linear and the other term k is a scaling factor used to make χ2 per degree of freedom (dof) becomes unity. The former process is needed in order to ensure that the dispersion of data points is consistent with error bars of the source brightness and the latter process is required to ensure that each data is fairly weighted according to error bars. The principal data were taken in I band. In addition, OGLE obtained some V -band data in order to characterize the mi- crolensed source. Finally, µFUN obtained H-band observa- tions from the 1.3m SMARTS telescope at Cerro Tololo In- teramerican Observatory in Chile. These are not used in the present analysis but will be important for the interpretation of future follow-up observations to cross-check the lens system parameters The light curve of OGLE-2013-BLG-0723 shows a system- atic decline in the baseline. A similar long term linear trend (of opposite sign) was seen in OGLE-2013-BLG-0341 and was eventually traced to a nearby bright star that was gradu- ally moving toward (in that case) the source star, so that more of its flux was being "captured" in the tapered aperture used to estimate the source flux. We searched for such a moving bright star by examining the difference of two images, from 2004 and 2012. We indeed find a dipole from a bright star roughly 1.5′′ away, which is the characteristic signature of such moving stars. Having identified the cause of this trend, we fit for it and remove it. Photometry of the event was done using a customized pipeline based on the Difference Imaging Analysis method (Alard & Lupton 1998; Wo´zniak 2000). Because the photo- metric errors estimated by an automatic pipeline, e0, are often 3. LIGHT-CURVE ANALYSIS The principal features of the light curve are a large double- horned profile near the peak, which is a signature of binary microlenses, and a short-lived spike two months earlier, which is characteristic of planetary companions. Modeling these features yields the mass ratios and instantaneous locations of the three bodies relative to the source trajectory. See Figure 2. However, by themselves, these features do not yield either the physical or angular scale of the diagram, nor its orientation on the sky. Rather, the diagram is scaled to the "Einstein radius", which can be expressed either as an angle θE, or as a physical length rE projected on the observer plane. The source star and the Earth's orbit act as "rulers" to de- termine these two quantities, as well as the angular orienta- tion. The source angular radius θ∗ is known from its observed UDALSKI ET AL. 3 TABLE 1 LENSING PARAMETERS Quantity χ2/dof t0 (HJD') u0 tE (days) s1 q1 α (rad) s2 q2 (10- 5) ψ0 (rad) ρ (10- 3) πE,N πE,E ds2/dt (yr- 1) dψ/dt (yr- 1) IS IB Value 4126.8/4073 6484.526 ± 0.037 -0.079 ± 0.002 68.48 ± 0.01 5.07 ± 0.02 3.11 ± 0.02 -1.195 ± 0.003 0.97 ± 0.02 6.61 ± 0.01 -4.936 ± 0.005 1.40 ± 0.02 -0.05 ± 0.01 1.35 ± 0.02 0.81 ± 0.02 -0.50 ± 0.02 19.825 ± 0.006 20.181 ± 0.008 NOTE. - IS and IB represent the baseline magnitudes of the source and blend, respectively. FIG. 2.- Geometry of the lensing event. The curve with an arrow rep- resents the source trajectory. Locations of lens components are marked by filled dots, where M3 is the planet, M1 is the planet's host, and M2 is the bi- nary companion. The cuspy closed curves are caustics formed by the lens. The inset shows an enlarged view around the caustic that produced the short- term anomaly. The small empty circle on the source trajectory in the inset represents the source size relative to the caustic. We note that the position of the planet and the resulting caustic vary in time due to its orbital motion around its host. Lower/left axes are expressed by angle on the sky in mas, while upper/right axes show projected size of the system in AU. The direc- tions North and East on the sky are indicated temperature and flux. Hence, when it passes over a caustic (see Figure 2), the finite extent of the source smears out what would be an extremely sharp peak for a point source (Figure 1, right inset). Second, Earth's accelerated motion induces dis- tortions in the light curve, which fix both rE relative the size of Earth's orbit (1 AU) and the orientation of the diagram rel- ative to that of Earth's orbit, namely the ecliptic. Hence, we are able to display both the angular scale and physical orien- tation in Figure 2. The mass M and distance DL of the lens are then given by 1 DL 4GM c2 = rEθE. + 1 DS θE rE (2) = , The first equation follows from simple geometry. Once the distance is known, the second equation follow from Einstein bending angle α = 4GM/(bc2), where b is the impact parame- ter of the lens-source approach. See the graphical presentation of the formalism in Gould (2000). 3.1. Microlens Modeling Full modeling of the light curve ultimately requires a to- tal of 19 parameters, including 14 parameters to describe the lensing system and five flux parameters. Some of these man- ifest themselves in quite subtle effects. The modeling there- fore proceeded in several distinct phases. First, we determine the principal parameters describing the binary-lens system by removing the data for 25 days around the planetary pertur- bation and fitting the remaining light curve to seven system parameters plus four flux parameters (two for each observa- tory). These nine include three parameters to describe the un- derlying point-lens event (t0,u0,tE), three to describe the per- turbations induced by the binary companion (s1,q1, α), one to describe the ratio of the source radius to the Einstein radius, ρ = θ∗/θE, and the two-dimensional microlens parallax vector πE = (πE,N, πE,E). Here t0 is the time of closest approach to a reference point in the geometry, which is chosen as the "center of magnifica- tion" of the caustic traversed by the source, u0 is the impact parameter in units of θE, and tE is the time required for the source to cross θE. We choose θE as the Einstein radius of the mass associated with the caustic, which is the total mass for the close-binary case, and the mass of the binary compo- nent located closer to the source trajectory for the wide-binary case. This convention leads to similar tE for the two cases, e.g. (Gould et al. 2014). The three binary parameters are the separation of the com- ponents in units of θE, the ratio of the companion to primary component masses, and the angle of the source trajectory rel- ative to the binary axis at t0 (since parallax causes this to change with time). The amplitude of the parallax vector is πE = AU/rE, while its direction is that of the lens-source relative proper mo- tion (in the geocentric frame). In contrast to the lens-source trigonometric relative parallax πrel = πEθE, which is a scalar quantity, the microlens parallax requires two parameters be- cause the lens is not directly observed, so the orientation of the lens-source separation relative to the ecliptic is not known a priori. See Gould & Horne (2013). Normally, one would not include parallax in the initial fit, but in this case it is so large that the projected Einstein radius is substantially smaller than Earth's orbit, rE ∼ 0.35 AU, so that there is no even approxi- mately good solution without including πE in the fit. With this parameterization, we find an excellent fit for the wide-binary case (s > 1) but only a crude approximation to the observed light curve for s < 1. We then incorporate two- parameter orbital motion, essentially the instantaneous rela- tive transverse velocity of the components in Einstein-radius units. This refinement results in negligible improvement for the s > 1 solution, but dramatic improvement in the s < 1 solution, so that the two models provide qualitatively simi- lar approximations of the data. However, it is found that the s < 1 case is unlikely due to various reasons as discussed in Appendix. We then restore the data from the planetary perturbation and 4 FIG. 3.- Distribution of the microlensing parameters of the best-fit solution, whose central values and errors are shown in Table S1. Color coding indicates points on the Markov Chain within 1 (red), 2 (yellow), 3 (green), 4 (cyan), 5 (blue) σ of the best fit. add five additional parameters to the fit: (s2,q2, ψ0, γ), where γ = (ds2/dt/s2,dψ/dt). Here (s2,q2) are the separation and mass ratio of the planet relative to its host (the smaller com- ponent of the binary), ψ0 is the angle between binary axis and the planet-host axis at t0, and γ is the two dimensional pro- jected velocity of the planet relative to its host. Table 1 shows the best fit parameters. In Figure 3, we also present the dis- tribution of ∆χ2 in the parameter space in order to show the uncertainties and correlations between the parameters. 3.2. Origin of Parallax and Orbital Signals The microlens parallax signal is quite strong (∆χ2 > 1100), but since the amplitude πE = 2.7 is one of the largest ever detected and hence quite unusual. Therefore, it is prudent to check whether this signal is coming mainly from one part of the light curve, which would be suspicious, or from the entire magnified portion of the light curve, as one would expect. Figure 4 shows that in fact the signal is coming from the whole magnified light curve. It also shows that planetary or- bital signal, while much weaker (∆χ2 = 41), is also broadly based. As expected, the orbital signal is more compact than the parallax signal. 3.3. Degeneracy Because the light curve is well covered, the parameters are well determined. However, the solution is still subject to three well known discrete degeneracies. First, there is a degeneracy between pairs of companion mass ratio and normalized sepa- ration (q,s), with one lying inside the Einstein radius (s < 1) FIG. 4.- Cumulative distributions of ∆χ2 from the best-fit (orbit+parallax) model for the standard (green curve) and parallax (magenta curve) models. and the other outside. This degeneracy is fully understood at first (Griest & Safizedah 1998; Dominik 1999) and second (An 2005) order for the case that the binary is approximated as static. We find that within this context there is no "close" UDALSKI ET AL. 5 We find (V - with the source. That is, in each band, the light-curve flux is modeled as F(t) = fsA(t) + fb, where A is the magnification. The source and blend magnitudes are then derived from the fit parameters fs and fb, respectively. I,I)0 = (0.52,17.09). From this color and flux, we derive θ∗ = 0.98 ± 0.08 µas by converting (V - I) → (V - K) (Bessell & Brett 1988) and then applying a color/surface brightness relation (Kervella et al. 2004). The derived color is well blueward of the overwhelming majority of Galactic bulge stars, except for horizontal branch stars, which are sub- stantially brighter. Hence, the source is almost certainly in the Galactic disk. Disk sources are rare in general (a few percent) partly because the source must be farther than the lens with the lenses being mostly in the bulge or fairly far in the disk, and partly because the column density of bulge stars is higher than for disk stars. However, given that this particular lens lies far in the foreground (DL ∼ 0.5 kpc), it is not unexpected for the source to lie in the disk. Based on the source color and magnitude, we estimate its distance DS = (7 ± 1) kpc. The exact distance plays no role in the determination of θ∗ because this depends only on the flux F ∝ L/D2 S, not the luminosity L and distance separately, provided that the source lies behind essentially all the dust. Given that the source sits 360 pc above the Galactic plane, this is almost certainly the case. The uncertainty in the source distance also enters into the uncertainty in the lens distance through Equation (2). In practice, however, this leads to an error in source distance of only 4%, which is small compared to other sources of errors. Finally, we note that the source color indicates a temper- ature T ∼ 6100 K, which leads to an estimate of the limb- darkening coefficient (needed for modeling the caustic exit) of u = 0.495 (Claret 2000). In most microlensing events, the blended light fb is just a nuisance parameter, but in the present case it is potentially very important. We first note that while the I-band magnitude is secure, the error in the (V - I) color (not shown) is quite large. First, the formal error of the fit is 0.2 mag. In addition, in contrast to the source flux, which is determined solely from changes in brightness, the blend flux depends on the accuracy of the baseline photometry. This can be corrupted by bright nearby blends, which are plainly visible on the images, and by stars that are too faint to be identified. Hence, we consider the color to be only indicative and do not make use of it in further discussion. However, the I band measurement is too bright to be the OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LA by about 1.5 mag. To further understand the origin of this light, we measure the position of the source relative to the "baseline object", which is an unresolved blend of the source with the star or stars giving rise to fb. We find ∆θbase = 55 mas. Since the blend contains 43% of the baseline light, this implies that it is naively offset from the source by ∆θblend = ∆θbase/0.43 = 125 mas. However, while the source position can be mea- sured extremely well because it becomes highly magnified, the "baseline object" is subject to contamination from unseen stars as well as the wings of nearby bright stars. We con- clude that the centroid of blend light is separated from the source by ∆θblend . 125 mas. Because the surface density of stars I < 20.1 in this field is . 0.1 arcsec- 2 (Holtzman et al. 1998), the probability that this blended light lies so close to the source (and lens) by chance is < 1%. It is therefore most likely a companion to either the source or lens. This issue can be resolved by obtaining AO images at two epochs to deter- FIG. 5.- Location of the source star in the color-magnitude of stars in the nearby field. Also marked are the positions of the centroid of the red clump giant stars and of the blend. For the first two, the error bars are smaller than the points. For the last, the magnitude is secure but the error in the color (not shown) is both large and uncertain, being at least 0.2 mag. solution, i.e., ∆χ ∼ 2000 between close and wide solutions. However, if both close and wide binary models are permitted two degrees of orbital motion, i.e. ds2/dt and dψ/dt, then the wide solution shows essentially no improvement while the close solution improves dramatically and matches the wide solution. In Appendix, we discuss the mathematical and phys- ical nature of this new variant of the close/wide degeneracy and show that it implies that the wide solution is strongly fa- vored. We also present additional corroborating arguments that this is the case. We therefore consider only the wide so- lution. Second, if the source lay on the ecliptic, the entire solution could be "flipped" relative to the ecliptic without changing the light curve. Since the source lies just 4◦ from the ecliptic, this degeneracy is close to exact, with the preferred solution favored by only ∆χ2 = 38. While this is enough to clearly favor one solution, the main point is that the two solutions yield almost identical physical implications. Finally, Figure 2 shows the small planetary caustics just to the right of the source trajectory. In principle, there could be another solution with these caustics just to the left. How- ever, this geometry is unable to reproduce the long slow "de- pression" that follows the planetary anomaly and is due to a demagnification "valley" that follows the axis defined by the two small caustics. Hence, the solution is both unique and measured with good precision. 3.4. Characteristics of the Source Star and Blended Light We determine the angular source radius θ∗ based on its de- reddened color (V - I)0 and brightness I0 (Yoo et al. 2004), which we determine from their offsets from the centroid of the red giant clump [(V - I),I]0,clump = (1.06,14.45) (Bensby et al. 2011; Nataf et al. 2013), under the assumption that the source and the clump giants suffer similar extinction. Figure 5 gives a graphic representation of this procedure, and also shows the position of the star (or ensemble of stars) that are blended 6 TABLE 2 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS Quantity Mass of the planet Mass of the host Mass of the binary companion Distance to the lens Projected planet-host separation Projected separation between binary components Relative lens-source proper motion (geocentric) Relative lens-source proper motion (heliocentric) Value 0.69 ± 0.06 M⊕ 0.031 ± 0.003 M⊙ 0.097 ± 0.009 M⊙ 0.49 ± 0.04 kpc 0.34 ± 0.03 AU 1.74 ± 0.15 AU 3.75 ± 0.33 mas/yr 14.5 ± 1.3 mas/yr mine whether its proper motion is consistent with the source or lens. If it proves to be associated with the lens, then this is a four-body system consisting of a brown dwarf orbited by a Venus-mass planet, with both orbiting a very low-mass star, and with this entire group orbiting another star that is roughly double the mass of the star that contributed to the microlens- ing event. 3.5. Physical Parameters The principal physical parameters are given in Table 2. From the determined masses of the individual lens compo- nents, it is found that the lens is a triple system that is com- posed of a Venus-mass planet (0.69 M⊕) orbiting a brown- dwarf host (0.031 M⊙) that is accompanied by a low-mass star (0.097 M⊙). The projected planet-host separation is 0.34 AU, while the separation between the binary components is 1.7 AU. The system is located at a distance 490 pc toward the Galactic center. Note that we give the proper motion in both the geocentric frame in which the measurements were actually made, and the heliocentric frame, which will be useful for comparison with future observations. Since DL is known, the conversion from geocentric to heliocentric frames is straightforward. 3.6. Which Binary Component is Host to the Planet? From Figure 2 or Table 1, the planet's projected position is 5.07/0.97 = 5.2 times closer than the stellar companion. If the planet were orbiting the more massive companion, this would occur with probability < 4%. In addition, in order to ensure stability of the 3-body system, the brown dwarf would have to be behind (or in front of) the star-planet system by a at least factor of 3 larger distance than the projected separation of the brown dwarf and star. This chance alignment further reduces the probability by a factor 32. Hence, while this configura- tion is possible in principle, it has extremely low probability. A very similar argument applies to a circumbinary configura- tion, in which the planet's orbit is at least three times larger than the separation between the brown dwarf and star, but just happens to be seen in projection close to the brown dwarf. 4. DISCUSSION OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LBb is a missing link between planets and moons. That is, its host OGLE-2013-BLG- 0723LB, being a brown dwarf in orbit around a self-luminous star, is intermediate between stars and planets, in both size and hierarchical position. Moreover, the scaled mass and host- companion separation of OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LB/Bb are very similar to both planets and moons in the solar system. See Table 3. Both Uranus and Callisto are believed to have formed in the cold outer regions of their respective accretion disks, and are mostly composed of the raw materials of such regions: ice with some rock. In the case of Uranus, it is be- lieved to have been formed closer to the current location of Saturn (10 AU) and to have migrated outward. In the table, the companion-host separations are scaled to the host mass. This is appropriate because the "snow line", the inner radius at which icy solids can form (2.7 AU in the solar system) in- creases with host mass, probably roughly linearly. A plausi- ble inference from the first three lines of Table 2 is that these processes scale all the way from solar-type stars hosting plan- ets, to brown dwarfs hosting "moon/planets", to giant planets hosting moons. However, while OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LBb is almost cer- tainly orbiting OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LB today, we cannot guarantee that it was born there. Planets in relatively close binaries (like OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LA,B) can jump from one star (or in this case, brown dwarf) to the other, if the system is dynamically perturbed (Kratter & Perets 2012). If this is what happened to OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LBb, then would have been captured from an orbit around OGLE-2013- BLG-0723LA to its current orbit around OGLE-2013-BLG- 0723LB. It would then be similar to Triton, which was cap- tured by Neptune out of solar orbit. Table 3 shows that the Neptune-Triton system in its current configuration is also not terribly different than a scaled version of OGLE-2013-BLG- 0723LB/Bb. It will be interesting to model the dynamics of the triple sys- tem OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LA,B,Bb, but it would be prema- ture to do so. This is because there is likely a fourth member of this system that is more massive and luminous than the other three, and which is separated by of order 100 AU or less. If confirmed, this member could significantly impact the system dynamics via the Lidov-Kozai mechanism. The prin- cipal evidence for this fourth member is that there is excess light in the aperture that is too bright to be the primary star OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LA, and is so closely aligned with the source that it is unlikely to be a random interloper. Because the source flux is known from the H-band light curve (which is not included in the present analysis), it will be straightfor- ward to subtract out the source light from a high-resolution adaptive optics (AO) image and determine the exact location of the blended light. If well separated, then its association with the lens can be established from its proper motion, de- rived from observations at two epochs, which can be com- pared with Table 2. If directly superposed in the AO images, then it is almost certainly associated with either the source or the lens because of the extremely low probability of a random interloper. The two possibilities can be distinguished based on the apparent color because the source is highly reddened by dust, but the lens sits in front of the great majority of the dust. OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LBb is the second terrestrial mass planet orbiting one member of a binary system composed of two very low mass objects. The other was OGLE-2013-BLG- 0341LBb. Gould et al. (Gould et al. 2014) showed that if all low-mass stars were in such systems, roughly one should have been detected. They noted that no strong statistical inference could be derived from this fact because, for example, if only 1% of low-mass stars were in such systems, there would be a 1% chance to find one. Because the question about the fre- quency of these systems was being framed a posteriori, a 1% effect is not particularly significant. However, OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LBb reproduces three of the four elements that went into their estimate of the fre- quency of such detections, namely small probability of pass- UDALSKI ET AL. 7 TABLE 3 COMPANION/HOST PAIRS Host/Companion Uranus/Sun OGLE-2013-BLG-0723LBb/B Callisto/Jupiter Triton/Neptune Mcomp/Mhost (10- 5) 4.4 6.6 5.7 21 rc- h/Mhost (AU/M⊙) 19 11 13 46 ing by the planetary caustic, small probability of crossing the central (binary) caustic, and location in a high-cadence OGLE fields. The fourth criterion, source magnitude brighter than IS = 18.5, is not satisfied, since IS ∼ 19.8. If the limit were ex- tended to IS < 20, the total number of available events would roughly double. Hence, the prediction would rise to two. With two predicted and two detected, the probability that these are extremely rare drops roughly as the square, i.e., roughly 10- 4 probability of this occurring by chance if only 1% of these stars were in such systems. Hence, while there is still no com- pelling evidence that these systems are extremely common, at least they are not extremely rare. Further, the current detec- tions remain consistent with the hypothesis that these systems are ubiquitous. The OGLE project has received funding from the National Science Centre, Poland, grant MAESTRO 2014/14/A/ST9/00121 to AU. Work by C.H. was supported by Creative Research Initiative Program (2009-0081561) of National Research Foundation of Korea. A.G. and B.S.G. acknowledge support from NSF AST-1103471. B.S.G., A.G., and R.W.P. acknowledge support from NASA grant NNX12AB99G. APPENDIX RESOLUTION OF THE CLOSE/WIDE DEGENERACY In the main text of the paper, we stated that the wide solution was consistent with a static binary while the close solution required substantial orbital motion to match the wide-solution light curve. At first sight this seems qualitatively reasonable since close binaries have shorter periods than wide ones. However, only one of these solutions corresponds to the physical system, while the other is merely a mathematical reflection of it. Hence, the real question is not whether each solution is physically plausible but what is the relative likelihood where each solution, if it were real, could generate the other as a doppelganger. Before addressing this, some comments must be in order as why this degeneracy is appearing in this case and how likely it will be to appear generically. In the simplest cases two solutions appear because to first order, the quadrupole expansion of the close-binary potential and the tidal expansion of the wide-binary potential are identical and so (to this order) produce identical caustics (Griest & Safizedah 1998; Dominik 1999). Contemporaneously, it was noticed that in more typical cases, the degeneracy could remain extremely severe even though the caustics were not actually identical and, indeed, appeared rotated relative to each other (Fig. 8 of (Afonso et al. 2000)). This was ultimately explained by carrying out the analysis to second order (An 2005). That is, an additional degree of freedom (basically, rotation) could compensate for the slower convergence of the potential. For wide binaries, the potential converges more slowly as the mass ratio of the companion increases and as its separation gets closer. This is well illustrated by small mass-ratio, e.g., planet/star, systems. Topologically, the two caustics are the same, but geometrically they are very different. The planet has a relatively weak effect on the stellar potential, meaning that the star's caustic ("central caustic") is well-described by low-order terms and hence subject to the close/wide degeneracy. By contrasts, the planetary caustic is strongly perturbed and not subject to this degeneracy (unless the separation is very large). In the present case, the caustic feature in the light curve of the wide solution is associated with the lower-mass companion, and the mass ratio is relatively large. Hence, one expects that (as in the planetary case) higher order terms will play a relatively large role. And indeed they prove to be too large to permit the degeneracy analyzed by (An 2005). Orbital motion then provides the additional degree of freedom to compensate for the non-trivial higher-order terms. Consider then a wide binary that is qualitatively similar to the present case. Regardless of details, its light curve can always be mimicked by including the appropriate amount of orbital motion. On the other hand, consider a (real) close binary with the (s,q) parameters predicted by the wide binary but with so far unspecified orbital parameters. Can this system "generate" a static wide binary with the same light curve? The answer is: only if its orbital parameters happen to lie in a narrow range around those predicted by the wide pair. Otherwise, the static wide binary would have been consistent with a wide range of close-binary orbital motions. Because ∆χ2 is quite large, the fine-tuning requirements of the close solution are severe. This is the principal reason that we discount it. However, in addition, if the close solution is spurious and merely tuned to the mathematical requirements of matching the wide solution, it is likely to have characteristics that are atypical of real systems, which can be a further indication of its spurious nature. We note two such features. First, the ratio of projected kinetic to potential energy (Dong et al. 2009) is quite low β ≡(cid:18) Ekin Epot(cid:19)⊥ = (sθEDL/AU)3(γ yr)2 M/M⊙ = 0.023 (A1) compared to typical values 0.1 . β . 0.5. The three physical effects that can produce low β are 1) it is near apocenter of an extremely eccentric orbit, 2) our line of sight happens to be almost tangent to the orbital velocity vector, or 3) we happen to view the system edge on, so that its semi-major axis is much larger than its projected separation. Since the unprojected ratio typically has values Ekin/Epot ∼ 0.5 reducing this number by a factor ∼ 20 via projection effects requires some fine tuning. However, in the present case there is an additional complication: the third option generates the need for an additional low probability event. That is, if the two stars are extended along the line of sight, then either this projection must be very great to allow the planet to have a stable orbit around one star (actually brown dwarf), to the planet itself must be seen in projection next to the pair despite 8 the fact that its orbit is at least three times that of the extended binary. Finally, we note that the source star is four times fainter in the close model. Since its color (so spectral type) is still the same, this places it twice as far as in the wide solution, where the density of such stars is about a factor 40 smaller. This is somewhat compensated by the eight times larger phase space, but still does further reduce the probability of this solution by a factor 5. All the arguments given above make the close-binary solution very unlikely but they do not exclude it. However, this solution can also be tested by direct imaging. Since there are compelling reasons to conduct such imaging, possibly at several epochs, no special effort is required to do this. If these observations reveal a blend that is substantially brighter than the source, then the close solution will be confirmed. The expected baseline magnitudes of the source and blend are (IS,IB) = (21.28,19.42), respectively. If the wide solution is correct, we expect the blend and source to be comparable (depending on their I - H colors). Afonso, C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 532, 340 Alard, C. & Lupton, R. H. 1988, ApJ, 503, 325 An, J. H. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 409 Bensby, T., et al., 2011, A&A, 533, 134 Bessell, M. S.& Brett, J. M. 1988, PASP, 100, 1134 Chauvin, G., et al. 2004, A&A, 425, L2 Claret, A. 2000, A&A, 363, 1081 Dominik, M. 1999, A&A, 349, 108 Dong, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 695, 442 Gould, A. 2000, ApJ, 542, 785 Gould, A., et al., 2014, Science, 345, 46 Gould, A., & Horne, K. 2013, ApJ, 779, 28 REFERENCES Griest, K., & Safizedah, N. 1998, ApJ, 500, 37 Han, C., et al., ApJ, 2013, 778, 38 Holtzman, J. A., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1946 Joergens, V., & Müller, A. 2007, ApJ, 666, L113 Kervella, P., et al. 2004, A&A, 426, 297 Kratter, K. M. & Perets, H. B. 2012, ApJ, 753, 91 Nataf,D. H., et al., 2013, ApJ, 769, 88 Todorov, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, L84 Udalski, A., Szyma´nski, M.K. & Szyma´nski, G. 2015, Acta Astron., 65, 1 Wo´zniak, P. R. 2000, Acta Astron., 50, 421 Yoo, J., et al., 2004, ApJ, 603, 139
1901.02831	1	1901	2019-01-09T17:08:50	Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Context: Seasonal variations and climate stability of a planet are very sensitive to the planet obliquity and its evolution. This is of particular interest for the emergence and sustainability of land-based life, but orbital and rotational parameters of exoplanets are still poorly constrained. Numerical explorations usually realised in this situation are thus in heavy contrast with the uncertain nature of the available data. Aims: We aim to provide an analytical formulation of the long-term spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets, linking it directly to physical and dynamical parameters, but still giving precise quantitative results if the parameters are well known. Together with bounds for the poorly constrained parameters of exoplanets, this analysis is designed to allow a quick and straightforward exploration of the spin-axis dynamics. Methods: The long-term orbital solution is decomposed in quasi-periodic series and the spin-axis Hamiltonian is expanded in powers of eccentricity and inclination. Chaotic zones are measured by the resonance overlap criterion. Bounds for the poorly known parameters of exoplanets are obtained from physical grounds (rotational breakup) and dynamical considerations (equipartition of AMD). Results: This method gives accurate results when the orbital evolution is well known. The chaotic zones for planets of the Solar System can be retrieved in details from simple analytical formulas. For less constrained planetary systems, the maximal extent of the chaotic regions can be computed, requiring only the mass, the semi-major axis and the eccentricity of the planets present in the system. Additionally, some estimated bounds of the precession constant allow to classify which observed exoplanets are necessarily out of major spin-orbit secular resonances (unless the precession rate is affected by the presence of massive satellites).	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. secularspin January 10, 2019 c(cid:13)ESO 2019 9 1 0 2 n a J 9 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 1 3 8 2 0 . 1 0 9 1 : v i X r a Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets M. Saillenfest, J. Laskar, and G. Boué IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, LAL, Université de Lille, 75014 Paris, France. e-mail: [email protected] Received 28/09/2018; accepted 07/01/2019 ABSTRACT Context. Seasonal variations and climate stability of a planet are very sensitive to the planet obliquity and its evolution. This is of particular interest for the emergence and sustainability of land-based life, but orbital and rotational parameters of exoplanets are still poorly constrained. Numerical explorations usually realised in this situation are thus in heavy contrast with the uncertain nature of the available data. Aims. We aim to provide an analytical formulation of the long-term spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets, linking it directly to physical and dynamical parameters, but still giving precise quantitative results if the parameters are well known. Together with bounds for the poorly constrained parameters of exoplanets, this analysis is designed to allow a quick and straightforward exploration of the spin-axis dynamics. Methods. The long-term orbital solution is decomposed in quasi-periodic series and the spin-axis Hamiltonian is ex- panded in powers of eccentricity and inclination. Chaotic zones are measured by the resonance overlap criterion. Bounds for the poorly known parameters of exoplanets are obtained from physical grounds (rotational breakup) and dynamical considerations (equipartition of AMD). Results. This method gives accurate results when the orbital evolution is well known. The chaotic zones for planets of the Solar System can be retrieved in details from simple analytical formulas. For less constrained planetary systems, the maximal extent of the chaotic regions can be computed, requiring only the mass, the semi-major axis and the eccentricity of the planets present in the system. Additionally, some estimated bounds of the precession constant allow to classify which observed exoplanets are necessarily out of major spin-orbit secular resonances (unless the precession rate is affected by the presence of massive satellites). 1. Introduction From the works by Laskar & Robutel (1993) and Laskar et al. (1993b), we know that the long-term dynamics of the terrestrial planets of the Solar System feature wide chaotic regions allowing large variations of their obliquity. In par- ticular, Mars is currently in a chaotic region extending from 0o to 60o obliquity, whereas the Earth is located in a sta- ble region thanks to the presence of the Moon, resulting in obliquity variations of only a few degrees. Subsequent stud- ies detailed both the past and future spin-axis evolution the Earth (Néron de Surgy & Laskar 1997; Laskar et al. 2004b; Li & Batygin 2014b), Venus (Correia et al. 2003; Correia & Laskar 2003) and Mars (Laskar et al. 2004a). On the other hand, paleorecords on Earth show that even the very slight variations of its orbit and obliquity led to ma- jor climate changes (e.g. Weertman 1976; Hays et al. 1976). This implies that life on Earth would be very different to what it is now if the Earth had evolved in a large chaotic zone, as it would have without the stabilising effect of the Moon. This conclusion is reinforced by the fact that high- obliquity planets undergo severe seasonal variations (e.g. Spiegel et al. 2009) even for a stable obliquity (but condi- tions suitable for the very emergence of life could still be achieved: in some extreme cases, the amount of liquid wa- ter on the surface may even be favoured by large obliquity variations, as reported by Armstrong et al. 2014). As the formation of the Moon is thought to have re- sulted from an accidental collision event (e.g. Hartmann & Davis 1975; Canup & Asphaug 2001; Lock et al. 2018), a "moonless" Earth was a possible (or even likely) outcome of the planetary formation process. In the broader context of exoplanets, the dynamics of such a moonless Earth is thus more than of academic interest. This motivated fur- ther works about the structure of the chaotic region (Li & Batygin 2014a) and some additional numerical studies (Lissauer et al. 2012). When it comes to exoplanets, we must face the problem of the incomplete and imprecise nature of both dynami- cal and physical data. Except from very favourable cases, like a fast precession and an important flattening induc- ing detectable transit depth modulations (Carter & Winn 2010; Correia 2014), the spin orientation and the flattening of exoplanets are far from being reachable by observations. They must therefore be taken as completely free parame- ters, in the spirit of the work by Laskar & Robutel 1993 for the Solar System planets. Moreover, the orbital proper- ties of exoplanets are not well known either, especially the respective orientations of the orbits (including the mutual inclinations, which play a crucial role in the spin-axis dy- namics). Several authors tackled this problem already (e.g. Brasser et al. 2014; Deitrick et al. 2018; Shan & Li 2018): they used numerical integrations of the planetary system in order to build the time-dependent perturbation of the spin axis. Applied to extrasolar planets, this method requires to choose a nominal value for both the rotational parameters and the unknown orbital elements. The parameter space to be explored is thus very wide, so that even elaborate nu- merical explorations require some degree of arbitrariness. Consequently, the use of numerical integrations at this stage Article number, page 1 of 23 A&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin could appear a bit in contradiction with the very incomplete nature of the data. However, the secular problem (averaged over rotational and orbital motions) is not as complex as it could appear. Some hints about a possible analytical treat- ment were actually given by Laskar (1996) and partially exploited by Atobe et al. (2004), Li & Batygin (2014a) and Shan & Li (2018). In the exoplanetary case, a refined ana- lytical theory would be very convenient, since it would give in a direct way the sensibility of the spin-axis dynamics to the various known and unknown parameters, instead of giving a list of possible outcomes. Associated with some bounds for the unknown parameters, such a theory would give a clear range for these possible outcomes. This was the approach used by Atobe et al. (2004), with the aim of finding the probability of small obliquity vari- ations for hypothetical terrestrial planets in the habitable zone of known exoplanetary systems. Their analytical de- velopments, though, were limited to the lowest-order ap- proximations (their parameter space was indeed enormous since, in this case, the planet itself was hypothetical). The recent work by Shan & Li (2018) also contains an analytical part applied to the particular case of exoplanets Kepler-62f and Kepler-186f. This time, their calculations were mostly designed to precise and explain numerical results, so they did not try to bring any substantial improvement to the theory by Atobe et al. (2004). In this context, the goal of this article is twofold: i) pro- vide a general analytical formalism for studying the long- term spin-axis dynamics of (exo)planets and ii) clarify what kind of information about the spin can be obtained from typical observed exoplanetary systems, that is, with nu- merous unknown physical and dynamical parameters. In particular, it is crucial for future studies to have a simple way to classify the observed exoplanets according to the characteristics of their spin dynamics. This would allow to determine which exoplanets are worth to be studied in more details (in particular if a complex chaotic spin dynamics is expected) and which ones have necessarily a very simple spin dynamics, making unnecessary any further numerical or analytical study. Such a general analysis will give both a qualitative view of the system if it is poorly known (in the continuation of Atobe et al. 2004), and a quantitative description of the dynamics if it is well known (as an ana- lytical counterpart of Laskar & Robutel 1993). This article is organised as follows: Sect. 2 recalls the Hamiltonian of the secular spin-axis dynamics and shows how it can be expanded in terms of the orbital motion parameters. The secular resonances at all orders can then be isolated and used to delimit the chaotic regions. Then, Sect. 3 shows how an incomplete set of orbital elements can still be used to constrain the orbital solution of an ex- oplanet. Combined with the rotational breakup limit, it allows to make a preliminary classification of the "non- resonant" exoplanets, for which no chaos can appear and the obliquity variations are constrained by an analytical bound. 2. Analytical model of the long-term spin dynamics 2.1. Development of the Hamiltonian Let us consider a system composed of a star and several planets. We study the rotational dynamics of one planet among them. For now, we consider that this planet is far Article number, page 2 of 23 from any spin-orbit resonance. Considering only the lowest- order term of the torque from the star expanded in Legendre polynomials, the Hamiltonian of rotation averaged over or- bital and rotational motions is given for instance by Laskar & Robutel (1993) and detailed by Néron de Surgy & Laskar (1997). It can be written X 2 α 2 (cid:0)1 − e(t)2(cid:1)3/2 (cid:112) 1 − X 2(cid:0) A(t) sin ψ + B(t) cos ψ(cid:1) − + 2XC(t), H(X,−ψ, t) = − (1) where the conjugate coordinates are X (cosine of obliq- uity) and −ψ (minus the precession angle). The quantity α is called the "precession constant" (contrary to previous studies, we prefer to exclude here the eccentricity e appear- ing in denominator from the definition of α). Following the derivation proposed by Néron de Surgy & Laskar (1997), we obtain α = 3Gm0 2 ωa3 2C − A − B 2C . (2) In this expression, G is the gravitational constant; m0 is the mass of the star; a is the semi-major axis of the planet in orbit around the star; ω is its spin angular velocity, and A (cid:54) B (cid:54) C are its momenta of inertia. The Hamiltonian (1) depends explicitly on time t through the eccentricity e and the functions A(t) = B(t) = 2(cid:0) q + pC(t)(cid:1) (cid:112) 2(cid:0) p − q C(t)(cid:1) (cid:112) 1 − p2 − q2 1 − p2 − q2 , C(t) = q p − p q, (3) in which q = sin(I/2) cos Ω and p = sin(I/2) sin Ω, where I and Ω are respectively the orbital inclination and the longitude of ascending node of the planet. In the following, we will write η ≡ sin(I/2). One can note that if there is only one planet in the system (two-body problem), the obliquity is constant and the precession angle circulates with constant angular velocity αX/(1 − e2)3/2. Let us suppose that the eccentricity and the inclination of the planet are small, such that we can develop the Hamil- tonian in series of e and η. In the following, we present the terms up to order 3, but the method presented here can be generalised to any order (as we will see, the third order is the first one at which the eccentricity begins to play a substantial role). Using the fact that C = η2 Ω = O(η2), we obtain A = (2 + p2 + q2) q + 2pC + O(η4) B = (2 + p2 + q2) p − 2q C + O(η4) . Let us now suppose that the secular orbital dynamics of the planet, resulting from the perturbations by the other plan- ets, is quasi-periodic. This amounts to considering that the chaos present in the orbital secular system acts on a much larger timescale than the spin dynamics under study. As we will see below, this holds very well for the Solar System (this methodology was first proposed by Laskar 1996; it is (4) M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets used for instance by Li & Batygin 2014a). In this case, we can write N(cid:88) M(cid:88) j=1 e exp(i) = η exp(iΩ) = Ej exp(iθj) Sj exp(iφj) , j=1 where is the longitude of pericentre of the planet in orbit around the star. The angles θj and φj evolve linearly with frequencies µj and νj, that is, j j , (6) and φj(t) = νj t + φ(0) θj(t) = µj t + θ(0) whereas the amplitudes Ej and Sj are real constants of order e and η or smaller. Such series can be obtained ei- ther from analytical theories or from frequency analysis of numerical solutions (Laskar 1988, 1990). In a general in- tegrable case, µj and νj are integer combinations of the fundamental frequencies of the orbital dynamics (usually noted gk and sk), and the series contain an infinite number of terms. Arranging the terms by decreasing amplitude, we consider here a truncation with N terms for the eccentricity and M terms for the inclination. We get then εH1(X,−ψ, φ) = −2 1 − X 2 νjSj cos(φj + ψ) , (12) (5) ε2H2(X, θ, φ) = − M(cid:88) j=1 νjS2 j E2 j + 2X (cid:112) M(cid:88) j=1 3α 4 j=1 X 2 N(cid:88) N(cid:88) M(cid:88) j<k X 2 j<k 3α 2 − + 2X EjEk cos(θj − θk) (13) (νj + νk)SjSk cos(φj − φk) , (cid:33)(cid:35) νkS2 k cos(φj + ψ) (cid:32) M(cid:88) k=1 νjS3 j − 2Sj νkS2 j Sk cos(2φj − φk + ψ) e2 = E2 j + 2 EjEk cos(θj − θk) , νiSiSjSk cos(−φi + φj + φk + ψ) . 1 − X 2 and (cid:34) (cid:112) M(cid:88) ε3H3(X,−ψ, φ) = − (cid:112) M(cid:88) M(cid:88) (cid:112) M(cid:88) M(cid:88) 1 − X 2 k=1 k(cid:54)=j j=1 j=1 + + 2 1 − X 2 i=1 j<k j,k(cid:54)=i − 2 νiSiSjSk cos(−φi + φj + φk + ψ) + O(η4) . In order to obtain an autonomous Hamiltonian, let us in- troduce the momenta Θj and Φj conjugate to θj and φj. The system has now N + M + 1 degrees of freedom. The new Hamiltonian (that we still denote H) can be written (10) H = H0 + εH1 + ε2H2 + ε3H3 + O(ε4) , where we suppose that O(e) = O(η) = O(ε). The different M(cid:88) parts are respectively N(cid:88) H0(X, Θ, Φ) = − α 2 X 2 + µjΘj + νjΦj , j=1 j=1 F(Σ, σ) = − with a = 1 + 3 2 E2 j 1 2 N(cid:88) M(cid:88) j=1 j=1 b = νp − 2 νjS2 j (11) c = −2 νpSp − νpS3 p + 2Sp (17) M(cid:88) j=1 νjS2 j . Article number, page 3 of 23 C = νjS2 j + j=1 j<k (νj + νk)SjSk cos(φj − φk) , N(cid:88) M(cid:88) j=1 N(cid:88) M(cid:88) j<k A sin ψ + B cos ψ = 2 M(cid:88) (cid:32) M(cid:88) j=1 k=1 j − 2Sj and from (4), + − νjS3 j=1 (cid:34) M(cid:88) M(cid:88) M(cid:88) M(cid:88) M(cid:88) k=1 k(cid:54)=j j=1 i=1 j<k j,k(cid:54)=i νjSj cos(φj + ψ) (cid:33)(cid:35) νkS2 k cos(φj + ψ) νkS2 j Sk cos(2φj − φk + ψ) (7) (8) (9) (14) We note that there can be no resonance among the angles φj and θj because they come from the quasi-periodic solution of the orbital dynamics. By definition, they are thus already "integrated". 2.2. One perturbing term: Colombo's top From (11-12), we conclude that at lowest-order to the per- turbation, resonant angles can only be of the form σ = φj + ψ. Let us consider a single resonance with the term j = p. We introduce the resonant canonical coordinates by the linear transformation (cid:26) σ = ψ + φp ξ = −φp (cid:26) Σ = −X Ξ = −X − Φp . and Assuming that the system is far from any other resonance, the long-term dynamics at first order to the perturbation is given by averaging the Hamiltonian over all angles but σ. Dropping the constant terms, we get (15) a α Σ2 + b Σ + c 1 − Σ2 cos σ , (16) (cid:112) A&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin As shown in Appendix A, the Hamiltonian has the same form in the case of a 1:1 spin-orbit resonance, with though a slightly different expression of the coefficients. This would thus only shift a bit the position of the secular resonances considered here. In this case, the tidal damping (respon- sible for this capture in spin-orbit resonance) is supposed to act on a much larger timescale than the spin dynamics studied here, such that our approach still holds. Finally, applying the modified time dτ = a α dt to (16), we obtain the following Hamiltonian (that we still denote F): F(Σ, σ) = − where 1 − Σ2 cos σ , Σ2 + γΣ + β (cid:112) (18) 1 2 γ = b a α and β = c a α . (19) The dynamical system with Hamiltonian function (18) is well known. It was thoroughly studied by Henrard & Muri- gande (1987), who called it "Colombo's top" in memory of Colombo (1966). In the following, we detail its characteris- tics of interest here, in terms of the two constant parameters γ and β. First of all, it is enough to study the case γ (cid:62) 0 and β (cid:62) 0 since we get the negative cases by the transformations Σ → −Σ and σ → σ + π, respectively. When studying the equilibrium points of the system (Henrard & Murigande 1987, or Appendix B.1 and B.2), we find that the phase space can have two different geometries according to the value of γ and β (see Fig. 2 for the phase portraits). The boundary between these two regions of the parameter space is the curve C1 = γ, β (cid:62) 0 : γ2/3 + β2/3 = 1 . (20) (cid:110) (cid:111)  Below C1 (regions A,B,C of Fig. 1), the dynamical sys- tem (18) has four equilibrium points, that we denote (a, b, c, d). The equilibrium points c and d merge along the curve C1, and disappear above it (region D of Fig. 1). Their respective positions are Σa ∈ [0, +1] Σb ∈ [−1, 0] Σc ∈ [0, +1] Σd ∈ [0, +1] , σa = 0 → elliptic (A,B,C,D) , σb = π → elliptic (A,B,C,D) , σc = π → hyperbolic (A,B,C) , σd = π → elliptic (A,B,C) . (21) The values Σa,b,c,d have explicit expressions in terms of γ and β, as given in Appendix B.1 (they correspond to the different roots of a quartic equation). Since the resonant angle ψ + φp is equal to 0 or π for each of these equilibrium points, they all correspond to configurations where the spin axis, the normal to the orbit (reduced to its pth harmonic) and the normal to the reference plane are in the same plane. As such, they are commonly called "Cassini's states" and labelled (1, 2, 3, 4) after Peale (1969), corresponding to the equilibrium points (c, a, b, d). We note the limiting cases  lim γ→0 lim γ→0 (cid:112) for β (cid:54) 1 : for β (cid:62) 1 : Σc = 0 Σa = lim γ→0 Σd = − lim γ→0 Σb = 0 , Σb = lim γ→0 Σa = lim γ→0 Article number, page 4 of 23 1 − β2 (22) and for γ (cid:54) 1 : for γ (cid:62) 1;  lim lim β→0 Σc = γ Σa = lim β→0 Σd = − lim β→0 Σb = 1 . β→0 lim β→0 Σa = − lim β→0 Σb = 1 (23) We are now interested in the width of the resonance, that is the interval of Σ enclosed in the separatrix emerg- ing from the hyperbolic fixed point c and containing the fixed point a. A pendulum approximation can be obtained for small values of β (as used by Atobe et al. 2004 or Li & Batygin 2014a), but this approximation is no longer valid when β grows. Since an analytical expression can be derived even in the general case, we will use it here. The computa- tions (Appendix B.5) lead to the following extreme values of Σ spanned by the resonance: (cid:113) Σ± = 2γ − Σc ± 2 They are defined whenever Σc itself is defined (regions A,B,C of Fig. 1). At this point, it is important to note that the coordinates (Σ, σ) are singular at Σ = ±1 since the problem actually takes place on the sphere (Henrard & Murigande 1987). We must thus study carefully the mean- ing of the limits (24) when one of them crosses ±1. This leads to two other limits in the parameter space, as the curves −β2 + β(cid:112) (cid:110) γ, β (cid:62) 0 : 8 β2 = 1 − 20γ − 8γ2 + (1 + 8γ)3/2 (cid:111) (cid:110) 8 β2 = 1 + 20γ − 8γ2 + (1 − 8γ)3/2 (cid:111) 0 (cid:54) γ (cid:54) 1/8 , β (cid:62) 0 : C2 = C3 = 1 − Σ2 c . (24) (25) (see Appendix B.3-B.4), delimiting the regions A-B and B- C of Fig. 1, respectively. We note that C1 and C2 intersect at (γ; β) = (1 ; 0), C1 and C3 intersect at (1/8 ; 3√3/8), and C2 and C3 intersect at (0 ; 1/2). Contrary to C1, the bound- aries C2 and C3 do not correspond to actual bifurcations of the dynamical system, but only to the limits where the resonant island contains the north pole of the sphere (re- gion B) and both poles of the sphere (region C). Hence, the resonance lies in [Σ−; Σ+] in region A; in [Σ−; +1] in region B; and in [−1; +1] in region C (see Fig. 2). In region D, there is no more resonance (the separatrix disappears), but the obliquity can still vary substantially. In Fig. 1, the colour shades in region D show the oscillation amplitude of the obliquity as the trajectory passes through Σ = 1. When β → 0, the width of the island tends to 0 and all the level curves in the (σ, Σ) plane tend to be horizontal. In this limit, the resonance width is small and almost inde- pendent of γ (pendulum approximation). When γ → 0, the phase portrait in the (σ, Σ) plane tends to be symmetric with respect to the line Σ = 0. From (19), we note that γ = νp α + O(ε2) and β = −2Spγ + O(ε2) . (26) Remembering that Sp is the amplitude of a given term in the inclination series (5), this means that the parameter M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets Fig. 1. Parameter space of Colombo's top Hamiltonian (18). There is no separatrix (and thus no resonance) in region D, delimited by the curve C1 (Eq. 20, thick black line). The curves C2 and C3 (Eq. 25, thin black lines) delimit regions A-B and B-C, respectively. In region A, the resonance island lies between Σ− and Σ+ (Eq. 24); in region B, it lies between Σ− and +1; in region C, it lies between −1 and +1 (thus the 180o full width given by the colour scale). The problem becomes unphysical above β = 2γ (blue line) since it corresponds to an amplitude Sp > 1 in the inclination series. Fig. 2. Examples of phase portraits for the four regions of Fig. 1. The equilibrium points are labelled as in Eq. (21). The level curves of the Hamiltonian are drawn with black lines out of the resonance island and with red lines inside the resonance. The parameters chosen are, from A to D: (γ, β) = (0.4, 0.1); (0.55, 0.15); (0.05, 0.7); (0.8, 0.3). region above the line β = 2γ in Fig. 1 (that is, Sp = 1) cannot be reached in this problem. As a simple rule of thumb, one can consider that β con- trols the resonance width, and that γ controls the location of the resonance centre (see the Hamiltonian at Eq. 18). From Eq. (26), we know that β is proportional to the ampli- tude Sp. Therefore, the resonance widths are larger in hot planetary systems, for which the mutual inclinations are large. This was exploited by Boué & Laskar (2010) in their scenario for tilting the spin-axis of Uranus. On the contrary, the secular system cannot produce any obliquity variation if the mutual inclinations are exactly zero. One must keep in mind that β depends on the precession constant α (Eq. 2) as well, so that "small" mutual inclinations do not guaran- tee that the resonances are thin. For the terrestrial planets of the Solar System, some values of α produce first-order resonances larger than 70o, even if the mutual orbital incli- nations are modest (see Sect. 2.3). Contrary to β, the magnitude of γ cannot be easily traced back from the planetary architecture: the first-order secular spin-orbit resonances of any planet can be located anywhere between 0o and 180o of obliquity. The large ma- jority of them actually lie in [0o; 90o] because most of the frequencies νp are negative (the explanation for this prop- erty is given in Sect. 3.1). 2.3. Overlap of first-order resonances Going back to the full Hamiltonian (10), the main chaotic regions of the system can be estimated as the overlap of the first-order resonances taken separately (Chirikov's cri- terion). With the analytical expression of their respective Article number, page 5 of 23 0π2πσ−101ΣregionAaabcd0π2πσ−101ΣregionBaabcd0π2πσ−101ΣregionCaabcd0π2πσ−101ΣregionDaabA&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin widths given in Sect. 2.2, the computation of the overlap- ping regions is straightforward for any quasi-periodic rep- resentation (5) of the orbital motion. When comparing two secular terms, we note that no chaotic zone can form if at least one of them is in region D, because there is no separatrix in D. This is well verified by Poincaré sections. A direct consequence of this property is that if all the terms of the quasi-periodic series are in region D, the secular dynamics of the obliquity cannot be chaotic at first order. Moreover, if all the Si coefficients are small (low inclination regime), so are the corresponding β coefficients, resulting in virtually no secular variation of the obliquity (see the shades of grey in Fig. 1). Actually, a no- chaos criterion can be obtained even if the amplitudes Si are not known: we just have to check that γi ≈ νi/α > 1 ∀ i = 1...M. On the contrary, if γi < 1 for at least two i, the existence of a chaotic region is possible, but not guaranteed. These properties will be discussed further in Sect. 3.4. This method can be easily checked in the case of the Solar System, since the secular spin dynamics of all planets have been studied in the literature. Moreover, a very ac- curate quasi-periodic approximation of the orbital dynam- ics can be obtained, since the properties and initial condi- tions of the planets are very well known. As an example, the upper row of Fig. 3 shows the widths and overlaps of first-order resonances for the terrestrial planets (light and dark-red regions). This figure was produced by applying the previous analytical formulas to the orbital series of Laskar (1990), containing more than 50 terms in both eccentricity and inclination (see Appendix F). We note that most of the first-order resonances overlap (there are almost no light-red regions). This results in wide chaotic zones even if the indi- vidual amplitudes Si are small. However, the full extent of the chaotic regions given by the frequency analysis (Fig. 3, second and third rows) cannot be retrieved by only consid- ering first-order resonances. The following section is thus dedicated to second and third-order resonances. 2.4. Higher-order resonances Outside of first-order resonances, we can use a canonical change of coordinates close to identity in order to suppress the angular dependency at first order (as already used in a similar context by Li & Batygin 2014a). Let us consider an intermediary Hamiltonian X = εX1, such that the current coordinates are obtained from the new ones through its flow at time 1. The Hamiltonian in the new coordinates is then (27) H = H0 + ε H1 + ε2 H2 + O(ε3) , where H0 = H0 H1 = H1 + {X1,H0} H2 = H2 + {X1,H1} + In these expressions, Poisson's brackets are defined as 1 2{X1,{X1,H0}} . (28) {f, g} = ∂g ∂qj − ∂f ∂qj ∂g ∂pj , (29) (cid:18) ∂f (cid:88) ∂pj j (cid:19) where the pairs (pj, qj) are conjugate variables, pj being the momentum and qj the coordinate. In order to suppress the Article number, page 6 of 23 angular dependency at order 1, the Hamiltonian X must fulfil the homological equation (30) H1 = H1 + {X1,H0} = H1 , in which H1 is the 0th-order term of the multidimensional Fourier decomposition of H1 (average of H1 over all an- gles), which is here equal to zero. By matching the terms of the Fourier decomposition of H1 and X1 one by one, the solution to the homological equation is εX1(X, φ,−ψ) = −2 1 − X 2 (cid:112) M(cid:88) j=1 νj Sj νj + αX sin(φj + ψ) . (31) Injecting this function into the expression of the new Hamil- tonian (28), we get H1 = 0 as required, and the second order term H2 is given in Appendix C. The only possible resonant angles at second order have the form σ = φj + φk + 2ψ. The width of second and higher order resonances is quite small, so that their separatrices can be computed assuming that X is near the exact resonance (pendulum approximation). Accordingly, the centre and half width of the second-order resonances are computed in Appendix C and given in the first line of Table 1. Outside of both first-order and second-order resonances, the same method can be used to compute the location and width of third-order resonances. An intermediary Hamilto- nian of the form X = εX1 + ε2X2 is used, in which X2 must satisfy a second homological equation (see Appendix D). The possible resonant angles, as well as the centre and half width of all the third-order resonances are given in Table 1. As before, the same method can be used in the case of syn- chronous rotation, by adding the term −αr(1 + X)2/2 to H0 (Appendix A). This would only slightly shift the reso- nances. With these values, it is straightforward to compute the overlap regions of every possible second and third-order resonances. Resonances of order 2 or 3 with a centre lo- cated inside a resonance of lower order are not considered (in other words, low-order resonances are supposed unaf- fected by higher-order ones). The result is shown in the top row of Fig. 3 for the inner Solar System (blue and green zones). We obtain a much better match with the frequency map analysis, showing the importance of high-order reso- nances in this context. Indeed, numerous frequencies of the quasi-periodic representation are quite close to each other, which implies that the corresponding resonances overlap massively. Hence, even if the second and third-order res- onances are thin, most of them are all located one after another, resulting in large chaotic zones. The chaotic dif- fusion is though slower for higher-order resonances. In the real Solar System, in which the secular orbital frequencies are actually not fixed but vary slowly (Laskar 1990), the dif- fusion of the obliquity will besides be facilitated by small modulations of the resonances locations. We note that third-order resonances include terms mix- ing both eccentricity and inclination (last line of Table 1). The existence of these terms shows that the s6 + g5 − g6 resonance, which is known to play an important role in the future obliquity evolution of the Earth (Laskar et al. 1993a, 2004b), has two different origins: one is a first-order reso- nance with ν23, and the other is a third-order resonance M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets Fig. 3. Top row: Estimate of the chaotic regions of the spin dynamics as the superposition of secular spin-orbit resonances. The orbital evolution of each planet is approximated by the synthetic representation of Laskar (1990), as detailed in Appendix F. Light-red and dark-red regions represent the first-order resonances and their overlaps, respectively (Colombo's top Hamiltonian, Sect. 2.2); light-blue and dark-blue regions represent the second-order resonances and their overlap (Sect. 2.4); and green regions represent the overlap of third-order resonances. The non-overlapping third-order resonances are not indicated because they are very thin and thus unimportant for a global picture of the dynamics. Second row: As a comparison, the system given by Eq. (1) is integrated numerically with the same orbital model (quasi-periodic decomposition of Laskar 1990), and a frequency map analysis is performed to locate the chaotic zones. The colour scale goes from black (no chaos), to red (strong chaos). Third row: Same maps obtained from a more detailed model in which the orbital evolution is directly taken from a numerical integration (adapted from Laskar & Robutel 1993). In the weakly chaotic zones, the dots are shifted vertically according to the level of chaos; in the strongly chaotic zones, they are plotted in boldface. Bottom row: Same as top row, but the long-term orbital evolution of each planet is approximated by the Lagrange-Laplace system (Sect. 3.1). The eight planets of the Solar System are included, with the initial conditions of Bretagnon (1982). Article number, page 7 of 23 0102030405060020406080100010203040506002040608010001020304050600204060801000102030405060020406080100precessionconstant(arcsec/yr)obliquity(deg)Mercury0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Venus0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Earth0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Mars01020304050600204060801000102030405060020406080100010203040506002040608010001020304050600204060801000102030405060020406080100precessionconstant(arcsec/yr)obliquity(deg)Mercury0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Venus0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Earth0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Mars01020304050600204060801000102030405060020406080100010203040506002040608010001020304050600204060801000102030405060020406080100precessionconstant(arcsec/yr)obliquity(deg)Mercury0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Venus0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Earth0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Mars01020304050600204060801000102030405060020406080100010203040506002040608010001020304050600204060801000102030405060020406080100precessionconstant(arcsec/yr)obliquity(deg)Mercury0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Venus0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Earth0102030405060020406080100obliquity(deg)Mars0102030405060020406080100A&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin between µ1, µ10 and ν12 (the numbering refers to Laskar et al. 2004b). The amplitude of the first resonance, which is the one emphasised in the literature, is larger by a fac- tor thirty. This resonance is present in the synthetic repre- sentation used in this paper (see the term with frequency −50.30212 (cid:48)(cid:48)/yr in Tables F.1 to F.4). In the top row of Fig. 3, it appears as a thin isolated resonance (upper-left corner of the graphs). Finally, since tidal dissipations are much more efficient in decreasing the eccentricity than the inclination, one can imagine a planet with an initially chaotic obliquity wan- dering in a mixed-type-resonance overlap region, becoming frozen out of resonance when the amplitudes Ei decrease due to tidal dissipation. As shown by Laskar et al. 2012, the eccentricity amplitudes of all the planetary system can be damped even if only one planet dissipates energy with the star. Hence the eccentricity modes of an external planet can be damped even if it is not itself subject to tidal dissi- pation. 3. Application to exoplanetary systems In the previous sections, we saw that in the low-eccentricity and low-inclination regime, the long-term rotational dy- namics of planets can be studied very efficiently by a simple analytical model. However, even if numerous exoplanetary systems are known nowadays, most of the information re- quired to characterise the rotation of their planets remains poorly constrained. This information can be split into two groups: i) the orbital dynamics (amplitudes and frequen- cies of the quasi-periodic representation) and ii) the rota- tion parameters (α coefficient). In this section, we will see how these quantities can be estimated from physical and dynamical arguments, even with scarce data. 3.1. The Lagrange-Laplace system Regarding the long-term orbital dynamics, one can use nominal orbital elements (either best-fit or assumed ones) and integrate numerically the equations of motion. The so- obtained solution can then be used directly (as did for in- stance Brasser et al. 2014, and Deitrick et al. 2018), or put in the form of quasi-periodic series and used as shown above. However, this method puts a heavy contrast between the very uncertain nature of the orbital elements used and the refined numerical solution applied. Actually, we will see that at this level of precision, the Lagrange-Laplace sys- tem is already a good-enough approximation of the orbital dynamics, up to moderate eccentricities and inclinations (and without strong effects coming from mean-motion res- onances). It was used for the same purpose by Atobe et al. (2004) in the case of a massless hypothetical terrestrial planet. The Lagrange-Laplace system is the lowest-order model of the long-term orbital dynamics: it uses a development of the Hamiltonian at second order of the eccentricities and inclinations, which is itself averaged over the fast angles (secular model at first order to the mutual perturbations). Let us write zk = ek exp(ik) and ζk = sin Ik 2 exp(iΩk) , (32) where the index k = 1, 2...N represents a given planet of the system. Writing z and ζ the vectors of all zk and ζk, the Article number, page 8 of 23 equations of motion in the Lagrange-Laplace approximation are and ζ = iB ζ , z = iA z where the real matrices A and B are only functions of the masses and semi-major axes. They can be retrieved from the lowest-order terms in eccentricity and inclination of the orbital Hamiltonian. Organising the planets by increasing semi-major axes, we get from Laskar & Robutel (1995): (33) j−1(cid:88) k=1  2nj 2nj (cid:18) ak (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:18) ak (cid:18) aj aj aj C2 ak mk m0 C3 mk m0 mk m0 C2 aj ak + nj (cid:19) Ajj = nj Ajk = and N(cid:88) k=j+1 (cid:18) aj (cid:19) ak mk m0 aj ak C3 if k < j if k > j N(cid:88) k=j+1 − nj mk m0 aj ak C3 (34) (cid:18) aj (cid:19) ak if k < j if k > j (cid:19) C3 (cid:18) ak (cid:18) ak (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:18) aj aj aj C3 ak mk m0 C3 aj ak j−1(cid:88) k=1 mk m0 mk m0  nj nj Bjj = −nj Bjk = (35) in which n2 j = G(m0 + mj), and the functions C2(α) and j a3 C3(α) are expressed in terms of the Laplace coefficients b(k) s : C2(α) = C3(α) = 3 8 1 4 α b(0) 3/2(α) − 3/2(α) , α b(1) 1 4 (1 + α2) b(1) 3/2(α) (36) (see Laskar & Robutel 1995, Laskar et al. 2012 or Murray & Dermott 1999). The equations of motion for z and ζ are decoupled and linear, such that the solution can be obtained by diagonalising the matrices A and B. Its expression can be taken directly from Laskar et al. (2012): it has the form of quasi-periodic series (5) as required by our model. The frequencies gk and sk are the eigenvalues of A and B, and the amplitude of the term k for the planet j is (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)Pjk (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)Qjk N(cid:88) N(cid:88) i=1 i=1 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) P −1 ki zi(0) Q−1 ki ζi(0) E(j) k = S(j) k = (excentricity series) (inclination series) , (37) where (P, Q) are the matrices composed of the eigenvectors of (A, B), the matrices (P −1, Q−1) are their inverses, and zi(0), ζi(0) are the initial conditions of planet i. In this case, we note that there is a single term for each proper frequency of the system; the frequencies µj and νj of the quasi-periodic representation are thus directly equal to one of the gk and sk, respectively. Table 1. Critical angle, location and half width of every second and third-order secular spin-orbit resonance. M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets σ X0 φj + φk + 2ψ 2φj + φk + 3ψ 2φj − φk + ψ − 1 2α (νj + νk) − 1 3α (2νj + νk) − 1 α (2νj − νk) −φi + φj + φk + ψ − 1 α (−νi + νj + νk) φi + φj + φk + 3ψ − 1 3α (νi + νj + νk) (cid:112) K) K (for a half width 2 8(1 − X 2 0 ) νj νk (νj−νk)2 SjSk 0 )3/2 α ν2 j νk (νj−νk)4 S2 j Sk − 243 2 (1 − X 2 j +3νj νk−ν2 2(2ν2 k)(νj−νk)3+ν2 α(νj−νk)4 j νk(ν2 k−α2) S2 j Sk (cid:112) (cid:112) 1 − X 2 0 2 1 2 P α(νi−νj )(νi−νk)(2νi−νj−νk)2 SiSjSk (cid:0)(νi−νj )2+(νj−νk)2+(νk−νi)2(cid:1) 0 1 − X 2 0 )3/2 α νiνj νk (2νi−νj−νk)2(2νj−νi−νk)2(2νk−νi−νj )2 SiSjSk − 486(1 − X 2 (cid:112) 1 − X 2 0 φi + θj − θk + ψ − 1 α (νi + µj − µk) − 3X0 νi µj−µk SiEjEk Notes. In the fourth line, the symbol P stands for: 4ν5 νjν2 j νk − 3νjν3 k − 2α2νjνk) + νjνk(νj + νk)3. k − 8ν2 k − 3ν3 k) + νi(ν4 j + ν4 j ν2 i (νj + νk) + ν3 i (13ν2 j + 13ν2 i − 12ν4 k + 16νjνk) − 2ν2 i (3ν3 j + 3ν3 k + ν2 j νk + From the conservation of total orbital angular momen- tum, one of the inclination proper frequencies sk is identi- cally equal to zero (matrix B has rank deficiency of order 1). The inclination series have thus M = N − 1 terms, whereas the eccentricity series have N terms. Moreover, all the incli- nation proper frequencies are negative (this can be shown from the Geršgorin circles theorem, see Appendix E). The result, in terms of chaotic zones for the spin dynam- ics, is shown in Fig. 3, bottom row. Although the match with the numerical maps (Fig. 3, second and third rows) is not as good as when we used the synthetic representation of the orbital dynamics (Fig. 3, top row), the estimate ob- tained is still remarkably good considering the uncertainties of the elements of an exoplanetary system1. Using this ap- proach with the nominal orbital elements given by Brasser et al. (2014) and Deitrick et al. (2018), we retrieve analyt- ically their maps showing the possible obliquity variations of HD 40307 g and Kepler-62 f, in terms of the locations and widths of the secular spin-orbit resonances (see Fig. 8 by Brasser et al. 2014 and Figs. 5, 6, 10, 11 by Deitrick et al. 2018). The differences of oscillation amplitude that they observe are a natural consequence of the initial posi- tion of the planet with respect to the resonance centre (see Fig. 2). This shows that the Lagrange-Laplace system, as- sociated with the development of the Hamiltonian (Sect. 2), is enough to obtain the level of detail required for study- ing the long-term rotation of exoplanets up to moderate eccentricities and inclinations. The use of a more elaborate model would add no substantial information, owing to the large uncertainties of the exoplanetary system under study. 3.2. Maximisation of Ek and Sk Unfortunately, several orbital elements remain unknown for most of the observed exoplanetary systems. The unknown elements usually include the mutual inclinations and the 1 Some subtle dynamical effects are not reproduced by the Lagrange-Laplace system, like the s6 + g5 − g6 first-order reso- nance mentioned in Sect. 2.4. relative longitudes of ascending node. From now on, we suppose that only the masses, the semi-major axes and the eccentricities are known for all planets of the system. In this case, the Lagrange-Laplace matrices A and B can still be computed since they only depend on the masses and the semi-major axes. We thus obtain the two sets of frequencies µj and νj. Because the initial conditions zi(0) and ζi(0) ap- pearing in Eq. (37) are not fully known, the goal here is to obtain the maximum possible value of the amplitudes Ek and Sk according to the available data. For the eccentricity, it amounts to maximise the modu- lus of a sum of complex numbers with unknown phase. The result is thus simply the sum of the moduli: (cid:104) (cid:105) max E(j) k = Pjk (cid:12)(cid:12)P −1 ki (cid:12)(cid:12) , ei N(cid:88) i=1 (38) using the fact that by definition, zi(0) = ei. The problem is more complex for the inclinations, since both the am- plitudes and the phases of the initial conditions ζi(0) are unknown. It is thus necessary to introduce additional ar- guments, either from physical or from dynamical grounds. Guided by statistics on the orbital excitation due to close encounters, Atobe et al. (2004), while dealing mostly with systems with a single observed planet, imposed I = e/2 for each of them. This law is also in agreement with sta- tistical distributions of observed exoplanetary systems (Xie et al. 2016). In our case, though, the application of this statistical result as a strict rule for each planet of a multi- planet system seems a bit simplistic. We will opt here for the hypothesis by Laskar & Petit (2017) of equipartition of the Angular Momentum Deficit (AMD) among the secular degrees of freedom. As they point out, this hypothesis is motivated both by theoretical arguments on chaotic diffu- sion in the secular dynamics (Laskar 1994, 2008) and by the aforementioned correlations in observed distributions. As shown below, this allows to smooth the statistical law over all the planets contained in the system. Let us intro- duce the "coplanar AMD" of a planetary system, that is, Article number, page 9 of 23 A&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin the AMD it would have if it was strictly coplanar: (cid:16) N(cid:88) j=1 Cp = Λj 1 − (cid:17) (cid:113) 1 − e2 j , where Λj = m0mj m0 + mj (cid:113) G(m0 + mj) aj . (39) (40) Contrary to Laskar & Petit (2017), we use here the Hamil- tonian decomposition of Laskar & Robutel (1995), where the integrable part is the Sun-planet two-body problem. This is also the one chosen when expressing the matrices A and B of the Lagrange-Laplace system (Eqs. 34-35). The AMD equipartition hypothesis amounts to considering that the total AMD of the system, N(cid:88) (cid:16) (cid:113) 1 − 1 − e2 j cos Ij (cid:17) , (41) (42) C = Λj j=1 is equal to C = 2 Cp . Hence, even if the individual orbital inclinations are not known, the so-obtained value of C gives a bound for them. For instance, the maximum possible value of the inclination of the kth planet is given by cos max Ik = max 1 − Λk , −1 . (43) (cid:35) (cid:34) N(cid:88) i=1 sin Ii 2 Cp 1 − e2 k (cid:112) (cid:12)(cid:12)Q−1 ki (cid:12)(cid:12) , obtained from (37) with unknown Ωi, using the con- straint (42). This constraint can be rewritten (45) (cid:112) 1 − e2 where ηi = sin(Ii/2), ci = 2Λi whereas the quantity to be maximised can be written i and Z = Cp, Y = N(cid:88) where bi = (cid:12)(cid:12)Q−1 bi ηi , i=1 (cid:12)(cid:12). The coefficients ci and bi are all posi- (46) ki tive, and 0 (cid:54) ηi (cid:54) 1. The constraint (45) forms an hyper- ellipsoid, whereas the quantity to be maximised (46) forms an hyperplane. Except from particular cases that we will dismiss here, there is thus only one solution for the max- imisation of Y , which corresponds to the tangency of the plane and the ellipsoid. This implies that the two gradients are collinear: ∇Z = λ∇Y ⇐⇒ ηi = λ Article number, page 10 of 23 bi 2ci ∀ i = 1, .., N , (47) (cid:104) (cid:104) (cid:105) (cid:105) max S(j) k = Qjk N(cid:88) i=1 Z = ci η2 i , In our case, we are trying to maximise the quantity Going back to the original notations, this finally gives Table 2. Secular representation of the Earth orbital dynamics given by the Lagrange-Laplace theory. µi ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) 3.7137 18.0043 7.3460 17.3308 5.4615 22.2944 2.7015 0.6333 (×105) 1628 1492 1490 1057 404 247 61 1 Ei max[Ei] (×105) 1974 1917 3286 2381 600 385 194 2 νi ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) 0.0000 −18.7456 −6.5701 −5.2008 −17.6358 −25.7514 −2.9039 −0.6778 (×105) 1377 1222 409 425 226 141 87 65 Si max[Si] (×105) 2420 1989 3424 1606 929 733 993 895 Notes. The eight planets of the Solar System are included. In the third column, each amplitude is maximised in the case where both the mutual inclinations and the longitudes are unknown, assuming the equipartition of AMD between secular degrees of freedom (since the Solar System is hierarchically AMD stable, the AMD of the inner and outer parts were taken separately, see Laskar & Petit 2017). The initial conditions and physical parameters are taken from Bretagnon (1982). where λ > 0 by definition of ηi. We get the value of λ from the imposed value of Z: N(cid:88) i=1 Z = λ2 b2 i 4ci ⇐⇒ λ2 = Z(cid:80)N i=1 . b2 i 4ci The maximum of Y with the constraint Z is thus max(cid:2)Y(cid:3) = (cid:118)(cid:117)(cid:117)(cid:116)Z (48) (49) . i=1 b2 i ci N(cid:88) (cid:118)(cid:117)(cid:117)(cid:116)Cp (cid:104) (cid:105) (44) max S(j) k = Qjk N(cid:88) i=1 (cid:112) (Q−1 ki )2 1 − e2 i 2Λi . (50) However, Eq. (47) does not take into account the condi- tion that all the ηi are smaller than 1. In practice, if the value obtained for λ implies that one or several ηi are larger than 1, we just have to fix them to 1 and use the same reso- lution method iteratively2 with the remaining ηi (changing the definition of Z and Y accordingly). Table 2 shows the comparison of the amplitudes ob- tained for the Earth with the full Lagrange-Laplace system, and their maximisation supposing that the mutual inclina- tions and longitudes of node are unknown. As shown in Fig. 4, a chaotic map can be obtained using these maxi- mum values. However, we note that each maximisation is specific to one single amplitude since it implies a distinct set of inclination values. Taking all the maximum ampli- tudes at once as if they formed one single representation gives thus a large upper bound for the chaotic zones. More- over, due to the large amplitudes of the series obtained, the small-width approximation for second and third-order resonances does not necessarily hold. 2 From the form of the constraint (45), decreasing one ηi to 1 implies that at least one of the remaining ηi should increase; from the solution (47), this actually means that all the remain- ing ηi increase. M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets the precession constant: instead, we will look for an upper bound of it from general physical considerations. After the sphere, the simplest shape model for a ro- tating planet is given by the Maclaurin ellipsoid (Chan- drasekhar 1969). It describes the equilibrium shape of a self-gravitating homogeneous body in rotation with con- stant angular velocity. The rotational symmetry is imposed (circular equator), leading to the formula (cid:112) (cid:17) (cid:16) √1 − 2 , = 3 (51) 1 − 2 (3 − 22) arcsin − 3 ω2 2πGρ where ω and ρ are the rotation velocity and the density of the body and is the eccentricity of its ellipsoidal figure (in any plane containing the rotation axis). Studying f = ω2/(2πGρ) as a function of the ellipsoid eccentricity, f is zero for = 0 and = 1, and it has one maximum at 0 ≈ 0.929956 with value f0 ≈ 0.224666. This implies that there is no such equilibrium figure possible for rotation velocities larger than 2πGρf0 . (52) ωmax = Converting the ellipsoid eccentricity in terms of momenta of inertia, we obtain the relation 2C − A − B (53) 2 . = (cid:112) 2C 1 2 Injecting it into the expression of the precession con- stant (2), we obtain the maximum value αmax = 3Gm0 4a3 2 0√2πGρf0 . (54) For rotation velocities close to ωmax, it is known that there exist equilibrium ellipsoidal figures with three unequal axes that have a lower total energy, called Jacobi ellipsoids (Chandrasekhar 1969). However, we only need an order of magnitude for αmax and the homogeneous approximation is anyway quite crude, allowing us to stick to the expres- sion (54). Planets are expected to spin much more slowly than ωmax (Eq. 52), including giant gaseous planets (Baty- gin 2018). In the remaining part of the article, we allow us to abusively refer to the "rotational breakup" velocity. Using the average density of the Earth, we obtain a minimum rotation period of about 2.4 hours, leading to a maximum precession constant of about 230 (cid:48)(cid:48)/yr. The true value for the Earth is 20 (cid:48)(cid:48)/yr, or 50 (cid:48)(cid:48)/yr if we include the additional effects of the Moon (Laskar & Robutel 1993). This remains well below our bound, but the difference with this "effective" precession constant due to the presence of satellites actually constitutes the largest source of uncer- tainty. Close satellites increase the effective flattening of the planet, whereas far satellites increase the effective torque from the star (Boué & Laskar 2006). In both cases, this increases the precession constant to be used in our model. This effect is particularly problematic for Saturn, because our upper bound gives αmax ≈ 0.75 (cid:48)(cid:48)/yr, while the true value is 0.20 (cid:48)(cid:48)/yr, but it increases to 0.83 (cid:48)(cid:48)/yr if we take the satellites into account (Ward & Hamilton 2004). Hence, the introduction of Saturn's satellites makes the precession con- stant exceed our upper bound. This problem is unavoidable for exoplanets, because the observation of satellite systems is hard and none has been observed so far. When using our model to study the spin dynamics of exoplanets, we must Article number, page 11 of 23 Fig. 4. Estimate of the chaotic regions of the spin-axis dynamics for the Earth, where the long-term orbital dynamics is approx- imated by the Lagrange-Laplace system. The same colour code as Fig. 3 is used. On the left, the complete set of initial condi- tions is used (same as Fig. 3, bottom row). On the right, the orbital elements (I, , Ω) are supposed unknown for all plan- ets while the remaining ones are taken from Bretagnon (1982). Accordingly, the coefficients (Ek, Sk) of the quasi-periodic se- ries are maximised according to the estimated AMD value (see Sect. 3.2). For simple systems as those studied by Brasser et al. (2014), Deitrick et al. (2018) or Shan & Li (2018), the res- onances are thin and well separated. A picture of the reso- nant regions (which do not overlap, in these cases) is thus enough to give clear view of the dynamics. Using the max- imised amplitudes gives the largest possible widths of the resonances, which, in turns, show the maximum obliquity variations and their locations. We fully retrieve their re- sults. In contrast to these simple and ordered dynamics, Fig. 5 shows as an illustration the maximised chaotic re- gions for the GJ 3293 system. The available orbital elements are taken from Astudillo-Defru et al. (2017), who pointed out that GJ 3293 d is in the habitable zone. In the spin-down process toward synchronous rotation due to tidal dissipa- tive effects from the star (thus decreasing the precession constant), planet d is the most likely to suffer from large obliquity changes. One must remember, though, that the chaotic zones are here maximised according to the avail- able orbital data. We also predict a rich obliquity dynamics for the Trappist-1 planets, but due to the confirmed strong effects of mean-motion resonances (see e.g. Quarles et al. 2017), the use of the Lagrange-Laplace model is probably inadequate in this case. Building an orbital theory specific to this system would be out the scope of this paper. 3.3. Maximisation of α In Sects. 3.1 and 3.2, we saw how to obtain a quasi-periodic approximation of the long-term orbital motion of a planet, and how to estimate bounds for its coefficients if all the or- bital parameters are not known. However, in order to study its long-term spin dynamics, we still lack an estimate of its precession constant α. Even in the Solar System, the pre- cession constants of the planets are not very well known. The estimate of α for an extrasolar planet would require observations that are very hard to obtain (its rotation pe- riod and a model of interior), and which would be specific to one exoplanet. In order to keep the study as general as possible, we will not try here to obtain a single value for 01020304050600204060801000102030405060020406080100precessionconstant(arcsec/yr)obliquity(deg)knownamplitudesobliquity(deg)maximisedamplitudesA&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin Fig. 5. Chaotic regions of the spin-axis dynamics for exoplanets of the GJ 3293 system, maximised with the method presented in this paper. The colour code is the same as previous figures. The bounds for their precession constants are, from left to right: αmax = 66, 20, 6.2 and 1.2 deg/yr (corresponding to maximum rotation periods of a few hours). For each exoplanet, the horizontal line shows the precession constant corresponding to a rotation period equal to the orbital period (obtained from the method of Sect. 3.3). They are, from left to right: 13, 31, 48 and 123 days. bounded by αmax, we can deduce that there can be no substantial chaotic zone if νi/αmax > 1 whatever the fre- quency νi. Moreover, if the mutual inclinations are small (as we assume they are), this implies that the obliquity is almost constant. Our bound for α (Eq. 54) can thus be used for a preliminary classification of the exoplanets, while the bounds for the amplitudes (Eqs. 38,50) are required for a more specific application to one exoplanet (they allow to constrain both γ and β, see Fig. 1). Table 3 shows the 94 planets classified strictly non- resonant with this criterion, using the Lagrange-Laplace matrix to estimate the frequencies (Sect. 3.1) and Eq. (54) as a bound of α. All the exoplanets from http://exoplanet.eu with known mass, semi-major axis and eccentricity were analysed (taking m sin I instead of the mass if a real-mass estimate was unavailable). At date 2018-03-07, this represents 143 systems with more than one planet, which contain 353 planets in total (plus the So- lar System). For some of them, the frequency ratios are so far from 1 that their classification is quite safe, even when considering the numerous sources of error inherent to our method, and in particular, the possible presence of satel- lites. This mostly concerns planets that are far from their star, like Uranus and Neptune, and no terrestrial exoplanet has been observed yet is in this category. Such large semi- major axes (third column of Table 3) imply that most of the planets listed in Table 3 are also unaffected by orbital and rotational tidal dissipation resulting from the interaction with their central star. Most of the exoplanetary systems known so far con- tain only two planets. In this case, there can be no chaotic region anyway coming from the overlap of first-order reso- nances (Sect. 2.3) because there is only one forced frequency in inclination (Sect. 3.1). However, this single term allows to go one step further and compute the variation range of the obliquity at first order. This is obtained by looking at the interval of parameters γ and β (Fig. 1) allowed for the exoplanet. A very simple formula can be derived if the inclination amplitude S1 (which is the only amplitude of the decomposition) is small. Indeed, this implies that β is small as well (Eq. 26), resulting in quite flat level curves for Colombo's top Hamiltonian (18). The maximum obliquity variations are achieved around Σ = 0, and at leading order, Fig. 6. Empirical mass-radius relationship obtained from the ex- oplanets with known mass and radius (http://exoplanet.eu). The exoplanets are supposed to be rocky up to 1 Earth mass, gaseous beyond 200 Earth masses, and of intermediate composi- tion in between. Three power laws are used: 1/3, 1/2 and −0.06 from left to right, in general accordance with e.g. Seager et al. (2007) and Weiss et al. (2013). thus always keep in mind that the presence of numerous or massive satellites could modify our conclusions for border- line cases like Saturn. Moreover, we must assume a density ρ for the exoplan- ets if their radius has not been measured, which adds even more uncertainty. If the radius is unknown, an order of mag- nitude of the density can be estimated through an empirical law adjusted to the observed mass-radius distribution (see Fig. 6). The density is anyway not the major source of un- certainty of our method. 3.4. Classification of non-resonant exoplanets In Sect. 2.3, we saw that the overlap of first-order secu- lar resonances, leading to the largest chaotic zones of the spin dynamics, can be produced only if the ratio νi/α is smaller than 1 at least for two frequencies νi of the incli- nation quasi-periodic representation. Assuming that α is Article number, page 12 of 23 0510152004590135180024680459013518001234560459013518000.20.40.60.811.204590135180precessionconstant(deg/yr)obliquity(deg)planeteobliquity(deg)planetbobliquity(deg)planetdobliquity(deg)planetc0.111010010−210−1110102103104105radius(Earthradii)mass(Earthmasses)M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets they are equal to 2β γ ≈ 4S1 . (55) ∆X ≈ This approximation holds very well for small values of S1. For the exoplanet WASP-81 c, which has the lowest bound for S1 in Table 3, we obtain a maximum obliquity excursion of 0.5o. This limit is very close to what is obtained by plot- ting the level curves of the Hamiltonian (18), and it holds as long as α and S1 are below their estimated bounds. Such a good constraint cannot be achieved for every planet in two- planet systems, though, since our bound on S1 from the AMD is sometimes not very informative. It is even dramatic for planets perturbed by a very massive companion: for ex- ample the maximum inclination amplitude of HD 92788 c is higher than 1, indicating that all inclinations are possible. The maximum excursion of the obliquity is harder to obtain if there are more than two planets in the system, since the dynamics is ruled by the superposition of several forcing terms. However, if the maximum maximised ampli- tude is small (last column of Table 3), the superposition of all the terms is unlikely to bring the obliquity over the limit given at Eq. (55). It can thus be used as well as an order-of- magnitude estimate. This results in a maximum of about 20o for Uranus and Neptune, showing the crude nature of our maximisation (as shown by previous works, it is very hard to tilt Uranus and Neptune by the mean of planetary perturbations, see e.g. Boué & Laskar 2010). 4. Conclusion The spin-axis dynamics of a planet plays a major role in its climate setting, and, by extension, in its suitability for life. However, the rotation properties of exoplanets are still very poorly constrained. In this paper, we presented an an- alytical formulation of the long-term spin-axis dynamics of a planet, allowing to link known and unknown parameters to its obliquity evolution and to provide a global picture of the dynamics in a straightforward way. At first, the orbital solution is modelled by quasi- periodic series. This method is thus valid as long as the orbital chaos, if any, takes place on a much larger timescale than the spin-axis evolution. The spin-axis Hamiltonian is then expanded in powers of the eccentricity and inclination amplitudes of the orbital series. We provided all terms up to order 3 but the development can be conducted to higher orders. A clear picture of the phase space structure is given by the obliquity ranges associated to the various resonant regions. The resonant dynamics at order 1 can be charac- terised analytically in terms of two parameters, which are linked to the precession constant α (gathering the physical characteristics of the planet under study) and to the quasi- periodic representation of the orbit. The pendulum approx- imation is only used at order 2 and beyond, for which the resonances are thin enough. The regions of resonance over- lap at all orders are identified as chaotic. In some cases (as for the terrestrial planets of the Solar System), these chaotic regions allow wide excursions of the obliquity. The method presented here allows to retrieve analytically the previous numerical results with a good precision. Numerical integra- tions prove thus to be necessary only if detailed statistics on the obliquity evolution are required. This is very informa- tive for Solar System planets (as shown by Néron de Surgy & Laskar 1997; Correia & Laskar 2003; Laskar et al. 2004a) but not yet for exoplanets because their initial conditions and physical parameters are still poorly known. Hence, the uncertainty of our results remains largely dominated by our lack of knowledge of the exoplanetary systems rather than by the approximations inherent to our method. This allows to stick to the simple analytical formulas presented here. At this level of uncertainty, the Lagrange-Laplace sys- tem provides a good-enough representation of the or- bital motions (excepted for exoplanetary systems featuring highly excited orbits or strong effects of mean-motion reso- nances). The formulas obtained allow to set an upper bound for the amplitude of the eccentricity and inclination terms if the mutual orientations of the orbits are unknown. On the other hand, the AMD equipartition hypothesis can be used, if required, to place a bound on the inclination from the eccentricity values. Through our analytical model of the spin-axis dynamics, these maximum amplitudes provide the maximum extent of the chaotic zones. For example, a large chaotic region is expected for exoplanet GJ 3293 d for rota- tional velocities above the synchronous rotation. Systems very affected by mean-motion resonances (like Trappist-1) can still be studied using the method described here, but with the prior construction of a synthetic representation for the orbital motion, written in the form of a quasi-periodic series. However, this method does not allow to consider tidal dissipations (playing an important role for exoplanets close to their star), which could be modelled as an adiabatic process acting on a much longer timescale than the obliq- uity variations (see Néron de Surgy & Laskar 1997). This amounts to make the precession constant α and/or the am- plitudes of the orbital series gradually vary. This method does not include either the effects of libration around spin- orbit resonances, even if a trick allows to take into account a possible locking in synchronous rotation (Appendix A). Finally, under the hypothesis of hydrostatic equilibrium, we can set a bound to the precession constant α. This bound is obtained from the flattening of the planet correspond- ing to its rotational breakup velocity. Since α governs the width and location of the resonances, this allows to classify the exoplanets that cannot be subject to first-order secular spin-orbit resonances. Among the sufficiently known sys- tems with more than one planet, we found 94 planets in this category (26% of our sample). If they belong to ex- oplanetary systems with low mutual inclinations (as it is expected in most cases for orbital stability), this implies that their obliquity is almost constant. This bound for α is though invalidated by the possible presence of massive satellites (as our Moon), but some exoplanets are so far from resonance that their classification is quite safe. This is the case of Uranus and Neptune. Considering the high efficiency of the analytical method proposed here, an obliquity stability map could be designed easily in the future for each new exoplanet discovered, and in particular for those classified as "habitable". However, such a stability map should always be computed again if any additional planet is found in the system. Indeed, it would shift the existing frequencies (especially if the new planet is massive), and add one frequency in both the incli- nation and eccentricity series, multiplying the possibilities of resonance. On the other hand, the total AMD of the sys- tem would increase, resulting in wider maximised chaotic zones. Article number, page 13 of 23 Table 3. Exoplanets from http://exoplanet.eu at date 2018-03-07 classified non-resonant with the method detailed in this study. A&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin Name j/N HD 113538 b HD 134987 c HD 163607 c HD 89744 c WASP-53 c HD 65216 b HD 85390 c HD 183263 b HD 204313 b HD 27894 d HD 204313 d HD 37605 c HD 45364 b HD 7449 b GJ 676A b TYC+1422-614-1 b HD 155358 c HD 34445 g HD 47366 b HD 73526 b HD 37124 d 55 Cnc d 24 Sex b HD 133131A c HD 45364 c HD 102272 c HD 108874 c HD 147873 c HIP 67851 c HD 125612 d HD 147018 c HD 12661 c HD 74156 c HD 11506 b HD 141399 e HD 4732 c HD 38529 c WASP-81 c HD 154857 c nu Oph b 24 Sex c Kepler-419 c eta Cet b HD 159868 b HD 82943 c mu Ara e HD 169830 c 1/2 2/2 2/2 1/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 1/2 2/3 3/3 3/3 2/2 1/2 1/2 3/4 1/2 2/2 6/6 1/2 1/2 3/3 5/5 1/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 3/3 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 4/4 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 1/2 2/2 2/2 1/2 2/2 1/3 4/4 2/2 a (au) 1.24 5.80 2.42 0.44 3.73 1.30 4.23 1.51 3.17 5.45 3.93 3.81 0.68 2.30 1.81 0.69 1.02 6.36 1.21 0.65 2.81 5.45 1.33 4.36 0.90 1.57 2.68 1.36 3.82 4.20 1.92 2.56 3.82 2.43 5.00 4.60 3.70 2.43 5.36 1.90 2.08 1.68 1.27 2.25 0.75 5.24 3.60 αmax ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) 233.0382 4.0960 31.3391 5497.1869 2.0657 242.7438 6.5843 104.8361 9.2689 1.2133 8.4220 5.8515 1672.3835 53.9106 25.8112 1363.7143 647.5095 3.2020 483.1022 1619.2167 30.8760 1.6778 287.8167 9.3548 965.6966 185.6220 34.1534 222.9728 6.7632 3.0777 28.5927 32.4707 4.3343 26.5808 7.2669 7.1381 3.0111 4.6451 4.2372 45.1541 124.2755 52.9030 317.3862 41.0373 391.5783 3.5196 8.7471 min νi αmax 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.7 5.9 6.6 6.7 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.4 7.9 8.2 8.4 max[Si] (×104) 1815 763 626 6954 221 596 726 2031 588 268 1343 850 1165 6921 1731 630 754 162 1270 1647 585 34 702 2688 289 3092 885 1300 234 844 357 1213 581 462 1144 730 86 22 898 1183 1300 1024 716 159 1902 405 984 Name HD 92788 c HD 113538 c HD 33844 b Uranus HD 47366 c HD 60532 b HD 73526 c HD 128311 b HD 110014 b HD 75784 c HD 89744 b HD 67087 c HD 142 c HD 1605 c HD 33844 c 47 UMa d GJ 317 c ups And d HD 200964 b eta Cet c HD 7449 c HD 87646A c HD 82943 b ups And e HD 200964 c HD 183263 c HD 82943 d Neptune HD 5319 b HD 202206 B TYC+1422-614-1 c HD 168443 c HD 5319 c HD 30177 b HD 128311 c GJ 676 A c HIP 5158 c BD+202457 b NN Ser (AB) d HD 60532 c nu Oph c HD 30177 c HD 92788 b BD+202457 c HIP 57050 c HD 202206 c NN Ser (AB) c j/N 1/2 2/2 1/2 7/8 2/2 1/2 2/2 1/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 3/3 2/2 3/4 1/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/3 4/4 2/2 2/2 3/3 8/8 1/2 1/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 1/2 2/2 4/4 2/2 1/2 1/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 a (au) 0.60 2.44 1.60 19.2 1.85 0.77 1.03 1.10 2.31 6.50 0.88 3.86 6.80 3.52 2.24 11.6 30.0 2.55 1.60 1.93 4.96 1.58 1.19 5.25 1.95 4.25 2.15 30.1 1.75 0.83 1.39 2.84 2.07 3.58 1.76 6.60 7.70 1.45 3.39 1.58 6.10 6.99 0.97 2.01 0.91 2.41 5.38 αmax ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) 3698.5423 27.9248 190.8341 0.0682 131.0535 565.4395 406.9428 265.4641 28.8866 1.2344 375.7932 6.1887 0.8689 9.5614 74.3551 0.3274 0.0069 7.8848 162.1684 77.3953 3.7979 17.3656 96.0380 5.6512 137.7501 4.5921 86.0321 0.0156 130.8026 90.1987 72.4459 3.9323 107.4439 4.4350 43.9586 0.5295 0.2293 100.0644 6.7742 39.3544 1.2729 1.0682 115.8082 51.6913 24.6886 9.7781 0.8811 min νi αmax 8.5 8.6 8.8 9.9 10.5 11.1 11.1 12.2 13.0 16.4 17.2 18.9 20.2 20.7 22.5 23.4 23.9 23.7 28.6 28.9 29.7 31.5 32.1 33.1 33.7 35.0 35.8 43.4 47.8 49.0 51.0 53.8 58.2 63.2 73.5 107.0 134.4 148.1 155.6 159.1 237.0 262.5 272.2 286.7 407.6 452.1 1196.6 max[Si] (×104) 10293 501 725 1009 967 1291 1309 1563 604 515 1771 2256 317 202 687 569 2182 768 412 446 2617 619 1498 6502 771 1163 10947 810 536 1183 110 401 831 941 643 901 168 682 902 382 587 1808 266 994 24 3521 237 Notes. The first column gives the name of the exoplanet; the second column gives the rank of the exoplanet (sorted by increasing semi-major axis) and the total number of planets in the system; the third column gives the semi-major axis value; the fourth column gives the maximum value of the precession constant estimated from Eq. (54); the fifth column gives the minimum ratio of the eigenfrequencies of the Lagrange-Laplace system and αmax in absolute value (γ parameter of Colombo's top); the sixth column gives the maximum amplitude of the series decomposition obtained from the maximisation (50), allowing to obtain a maximum bound for the β parameter of Colombo's top. Acknowledgements. We thank the anonymous referee for her or his detailed review. References Armstrong, J. C., Barnes, R., Domagal-Goldman, S., et al. 2014, As- Astudillo-Defru, N., Forveille, T., Bonfils, X., et al. 2017, A&A, 602, trobiology, 14, 277 A88 Atobe, K., Ida, S., & Ito, T. 2004, Icarus, 168, 223 Batygin, K. 2018, AJ, 155, 178 Boué, G. & Laskar, J. 2006, Icarus, 185, 312 Boué, G. & Laskar, J. 2010, ApJ, 712, L44 Brasser, R., Ida, S., & Kokubo, E. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 3685 Bretagnon, P. 1982, A&A, 114, 278 Article number, page 14 of 23 Canup, R. M. & Asphaug, E. 2001, Nature, 412, 708 Carter, J. A. & Winn, J. N. 2010, ApJ, 716, 850 Chandrasekhar, S. 1969, Ellipsoidal figures of equilibrium (Yale Uni- versity Press) Colombo, G. 1966, AJ, 71, 891 Correia, A. C. M. 2014, A&A, 570, L5 Correia, A. C. M. & Laskar, J. 2003, Icarus, 163, 24 Correia, A. C. M., Laskar, J., & de Surgy, O. N. 2003, Icarus, 163, 1 Deitrick, R., Barnes, R., Quinn, T. R., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 60 Geršgorin, S. 1931, Bulletin de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSS, Classe des sciences mathématiques et naturelles, 6, 749 Hartmann, W. K. & Davis, D. R. 1975, Icarus, 24, 504 Hays, J. D., Imbrie, J., & Shackleton, N. J. 1976, Science, 194, 1121 Henrard, J. & Murigande, C. 1987, Celestial Mechanics, 40, 345 Laskar, J. 1988, A&A, 198, 341 Laskar, J. 1990, Icarus, 88, 266 Laskar, J. 1994, A&A, 287, L9 M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets Laskar, J. 1996, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 64, Laskar, J. 2008, Icarus, 196, 1 Laskar, J., Boué, G., & Correia, A. C. M. 2012, A&A, 538, A105 Laskar, J., Correia, A. C. M., Gastineau, M., et al. 2004a, Icarus, 170, Laskar, J., Joutel, F., & Boudin, F. 1993a, A&A, 270, 522 Laskar, J., Joutel, F., & Robutel, P. 1993b, Nature, 361, 615 Laskar, J. & Petit, A. C. 2017, A&A, 605, A72 Laskar, J. & Robutel, P. 1993, Nature, 361, 608 Laskar, J. & Robutel, P. 1995, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 62, 193 Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., et al. 2004b, A&A, 428, 261 Li, G. & Batygin, K. 2014a, ApJ, 790, 69 Li, G. & Batygin, K. 2014b, ApJ, 795, 67 Lissauer, J. J., Barnes, J. W., & Chambers, J. E. 2012, Icarus, 217, 115 343 77 Lock, S. J., Stewart, S. T., Petaev, M. I., et al. 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 123, 910 Murray, C. D. & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar system dynamics (Cam- bridge University Press) Néron de Surgy, O. & Laskar, J. 1997, A&A, 318, 975 Peale, S. J. 1969, AJ, 74, 483 Quarles, B., Quintana, E. V., Lopez, E., Schlieder, J. E., & Barclay, Seager, S., Kuchner, M., Hier-Majumder, C. A., & Militzer, B. 2007, T. 2017, ApJ, 842, L5 ApJ, 669, 1279 Shan, Y. & Li, G. 2018, AJ, 155, 237 Spiegel, D. S., Menou, K., & Scharf, C. A. 2009, ApJ, 691, 596 Varga, R. S. 2004, Geršgorin and His Circles (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg) Ward, W. R. & Hamilton, D. P. 2004, AJ, 128, 2501 Weertman, J. 1976, Nature, 261, 17 Weiss, L. M., Marcy, G. W., Rowe, J. F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 14 Xie, J.-W., Dong, S., Zhu, Z., et al. 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 113, 11431 Article number, page 15 of 23 A&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin Appendix A: Case of a 1 : 1 spin-orbit resonance Numerous exoplanets are observed very close to their star, in a place where the tidal frictions are strong enough to efficiently lock them in synchronous rotation. In this sec- tion, we show that if the librations around the synchronous rotation are much faster than the secular spin-axis dynam- ics, we can retrieve Colombo's top Hamiltonian (Sect. 2.2), allowing to use the same approach as in the non-resonant case. As before, though, we will not consider the effect of the tidal dissipation on the obliquity. This is thus only valid for systems for which the tidal damping of the obliquity acts on a larger timescale than the spin-axis dynamics. We will use the same method as Correia et al. (2003). Let us write λ the mean longitude of the planet in orbit around the star, and (cid:96) its rotation angle. The mean longi- tude λ is measured from the equinox at a reference epoch (for instance J2000), whereas the rotation angle (cid:96) is mea- sured from the equinox of the date up to a fixed point of the equator (principal axis A). If we keep the angles of the form (cid:96) − λ during the average over the mean longitude and the fast rotation angles (see Néron de Surgy & Laskar 1997), the corresponding "semi-averaged" Hamiltonian is L2 2C H(L, Λ, Y, (cid:96), M,−ψ, t) = + nΛ − (L + Y )2 cos(cid:2)2((cid:96) − λ − ψ)(cid:3) L2 − Y 2(cid:0) A(t) sin ψ + B(t) cos ψ(cid:1) + 2Y C(t) , (cid:112) − − αr 2L Y 2 L(cid:0)1 − e(t)2(cid:1)3/2 α 2 (A.1) where we neglected terms of order e(B − A)/C. The mo- menta L = Cω and Y = LX are conjugate to (cid:96) and −ψ, respectively. The momentum Λ, conjugate to λ, has been added such that λ = n (mean motion). The resonant pre- cession constant is defined as αr = 3Gm0 8 ωa3 B − A C , (A.2) using the same notation as Eq. (2). We note that the angle λ+ψ appearing in the Hamiltonian corresponds to the mean longitude measured from the equinox of the date. Let us use the canonical change of coordinates (cid:26) θ = (cid:96) − λ γ = λ (cid:26) I = L and Γ = L + Λ . (A.3) Y 2 α 2 αr 2I The momentum Γ is an arbitrary constant of motion and the Hamiltonian becomes H(I, Y, θ,−ψ, t) = I 2 − Y 2(cid:0) I 2 2C − nI − I(cid:0)1 − e(t)2(cid:1)3/2 A(t) sin ψ + B(t) cos ψ(cid:1) + 2Y C(t). (I + Y )2 cos(2θ − 2ψ) − − We will now suppose that the dynamics of θ, corresponding to the "semi-secular" timescale (either circulation or oscilla- tion), is much faster than the evolution of the other degrees of freedom, corresponding to the secular timescale. We thus (cid:112) (A.4) Article number, page 16 of 23 consider for now that except (I, θ), all the variables are fixed (adiabatic approximation). The equations of motion are ∂H I = − ∂θ ∂H θ = ∂I = (I + Y )2 = −αr I C − n + αr 2 I α 2 I 2 − Y 2 (cid:0) I I 2 √I 2 − Y 2 − − Y 2 sin(2θ − 2ψ) I 2(cid:0)1 − e(t)2(cid:1)3/2 A(t) sin ψ + B(t) cos ψ(cid:1) . cos(2θ − 2ψ) (A.5) Using the definition of I, Y and αr, the first equation gives 3Gm0 8a3 B − A C (1 + X)2 sin(2θ − 2ψ), ω = − resulting, for any value of X, to two equilibrium points: θ = ψ and ψ+π/2 mod π. We note that θ = ψ is an elliptic equilibrium while θ = ψ + π/2 is hyperbolic. Injecting this into the second equation, we obtain (A.6) I θ = C − n + small terms, (A.7) in which the small terms correspond to the precession of the spin axis (α and αr) and the precession of the orbit (A and B). The equilibrium condition, corresponding to the exact resonance, is thus ω ≈ n. Considering that the planet is locked in synchronous rotation, we have thus θ = ψ and ω ≈ n. According to the adiabatic approximation, this will be verified whatever the value of the slow variables, such that we can inject them into the full Hamiltonian: X 2 (cid:0)1 − e(t)2(cid:1)3/2 − α 2 αr 2 (A.8) (1 + X)2 H(X,−ψ, t) = − 1 − X 2(cid:0) A(t) sin ψ + B(t) cos ψ(cid:1) + 2XC(t) , (cid:112) − where this time, we use X as conjugate momentum of −ψ (the Hamiltonian is thus divided by the constant L). In the expression of α and αr, we must replace ω by n. We get here one extra term with respect to (1), due to the spin- orbit resonance. Using the same method as in Sect. 2.2, the Hamiltonian in case of a first-order secular spin-orbit resonance is 1 2 F(Σ, σ) = − (a α + αr)Σ2 + (b + αr)Σ + c 1 − Σ2 cos σ, (A.9) which must be compared to (16). This Hamiltonian has the same general form and it can be reduced to Colombo's top. We can thus apply the same method of resolution (redefin- ing the constants accordingly). (cid:112) Appendix B: Characteristic quantities of Colombo's top Appendix B.1: Equilibrium points From (18), the equations of motion are (cid:112)  Σ = − σ = + ∂F ∂σ ∂F ∂Σ = β 1 − Σ2 sin σ = −Σ + γ − β Σ √1 − Σ2 cos σ . (B.1) M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets (cid:112) Apart from the coordinate singularity at Σ = ±1, the first equation implies that Σ = 0 when σ = 0 or π. Injecting this into the second equation, we get ∆4 = 16γ2β2(cid:104) 1 − Σ2 = ±βΣ (B.2) (γ − Σ) where β (cid:62) 0 by hypothesis. The resolution of this equation requires to square left and right-hand terms, loosing the information3 about the sign of cos σ. We obtain a quartic equation in Σ: P4(Σ) = Σ4− 2γΣ3 + (γ2 + β2− 1)Σ2 +2γΣ− γ2 = 0 , (B.3) with discriminant − γ6 + 3(1 − β2)γ4 − 3(1 + 7β2 + β4)γ2 + (1 − β2)3(cid:105) (cid:112) P4(Σ)(cid:12)(cid:12)β=0 = (Σ − 1)(Σ + 1)(Σ − γ)2 (cid:112) P4(Σ)(cid:12)(cid:12)γ=0 = (Σ − 1 − β2)(Σ + 1 − β2)Σ2 , It is zero for the particular cases γ = 0 or β = 0, for which the polynomial can be factored into, respectively, (B.4) . (B.5) showing the corresponding solutions and their multiplici- ties. They constitute equilibrium points of the system when- ever they are real and in the interval [−1; 1]. For γ > 0 and β > 0, the discriminant can be either negative (two equilibrium points), zero (three equilibrium points among which one double root), or positive (four equi- librium points). The corresponding solutions can be written analytically according to the general resolution of quartic equations. They are namely Σa = Σb = Σc = Σd = 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 γ − V + γ − V − γ + V − γ + V + 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2C − D + γ 2C − D + γ 2C − D − γ 2C − D − γ 1 + β2 V 1 + β2 V 1 + β2 V 1 + β2 V , (B.6) where numerous intermediary variables are required in or- der to get compact expressions: (cid:114) (cid:114) (cid:114) (cid:114) W = γ2 + β2 − 1 (cid:112) Z = 108γ2β2 + 2W 3 (cid:114) (cid:16) U = 3 Z + 1 2 Z 2 − 4W 6 (cid:17) (cid:19) W 2 3 (cid:18) C = γ2 − W 2 U + D = U √C + D . V = 1 3 1 2 (B.7) We note that Σc,d are real solutions only when ∆4 (cid:62) 0 (see below for the limit in terms of γ and β). The corresponding values of σ are (B.8) σa = 0 , σb = π , σc = π , σd = π . The points a, b and d are elliptic fixed points, whereas the point c is hyperbolic. 3 After having computed one solution Σ0, this information is retrieved by checking the sign of Σ0/(γ − Σ0). Appendix B.2: First boundary (BC/D) The zero value of (B.4) corresponds to a bifurcation. Its position can be computed by solving the equation ∆4 = 0, which corresponds to solving a cubic equation either in γ2 or β2. Choosing to solve it in terms of β, the discriminant is (B.9) ∆ = −19683 γ4(1 + γ2)2 < 0 , meaning that there is only one real solution. This solution is (cid:16) 1 − γ2/3(cid:17)3 γ2 = β2 = which is the boundary C1 (20). or 1 − β2/3(cid:17)3 (cid:16) , (B.10) Appendix B.3: Second boundary (A/B) The other two boundaries can be obtained by studying the level curves of the Hamiltonian passing through Σ = ±1 (which is singular using the coordinates Σ and σ, but it does not matter here). Let us begin with the +1 case, for which the Hamilto- nian has value −1/2 + γ. We now look for this specific level curve along the axes σ = 0 and σ = π. This leads to the equation 1 2 1 2 + γ , Σ2 + γΣ ± β 1 − Σ2 = − − for which Σ = +1 is a solution. By reorganising the terms, taking the square (thus loosing the information about the sign of cos σ), and dividing by (Σ − 1), we get + γ2 + β2 P3(Σ) = (cid:18) 1 (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:18) Σ3 + Σ2 + (B.11) Σ (cid:112) 4 − γ 1 4 − (cid:19) + + β2 + γ − γ2 = 0 , which is a cubic equation in Σ. Its determinant is (B.12) . (cid:21) 1 4 1 4 − (cid:18) (cid:20) −β4 + (cid:18) 1 (cid:19) P3(Σ)(cid:12)(cid:12)β=0 = P3(Σ)(cid:12)(cid:12)γ=0 = ∆3 = β2 4 − 5γ − 2γ2 β2 + γ(1 − γ)3 (B.13) Once again, it is zero for β = 0. Moreover the solutions for γ = 0 can be easily computed. In these two particular cases, the polynomial can be factored into, respectively, 1 4 1 4 (cid:112) (Σ − 1)(Σ + 1 − 2γ)2 1 − 4β2)(Σ + (Σ − (cid:112) 1 − 4β2)(Σ + 1) , (B.14) showing the solutions and their multiplicities. For γ > 0 and β > 0, the discriminant can be either negative (one so- lution), zero (three solutions among which one double root), or positive (three solutions). The zero value corresponds to the limit we are looking for. Its position can be computed by solving the equation ∆3 = 0, which amounts to solving a quadratic equation in β2 or a quartic equation in γ. Choos- ing to solve it in terms of β, the only positive solution is (cid:16) 1 − 20γ − 8γ2 + (1 + 8γ)3/2(cid:17) β2 = 1 8 which is the boundary C2 (25). , (B.15) Article number, page 17 of 23 A&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin obtain ε2 H2 = − 3 4 + 2X − 2X αX 2 M(cid:88) M(cid:88) j=1 j=1 N(cid:88) j=1 E2 j νjS2 j νj + αX ν2 j S2 j M(cid:88) ν2 j S2 j (νj + αX)2 j=1 EjEk cos(θj − θk) − α(1 − X 2) N(cid:88) (cid:104) M(cid:88) αX 2 − 3 2 j<k SjSk + Appendix B.4: Third boundary (B/C) Let us now study the level curve of the Hamiltonian passing in Σ = −1, which has value −1/2− γ. The procedure is the same as for the second boundary, and the new formulas are obtained simply by replacing γ by −γ. There is though an ambiguity because there are two positive solutions β2 (as a function of γ) which cancel the determinant. The one corresponding to the bifurcation is the largest, that is, (cid:16) 1 + 20γ − 8γ2 + (1 − 8γ)3/2(cid:17) β2 = 1 8 , (B.16) which is the boundary C3 (25). (cid:112) Appendix B.5: Separatrices The position at σ = 0 or π of the separatrix emerging from the hyperbolic point (Σ, σ) = (Σc, π) defines the boundaries of the resonant region (see Fig. 1). Writing f = F(Σc, π), the equations to solve are 1 2 Σ2 + γΣ ± β 1 − Σ2 = f . − The resolution of this equation requires to square left and right-hand terms, loosing the information4 about the sign of cos σ. We obtain a quartic equation in Σ, (B.17) 1 4 Σ4 − γΣ3 + (γ2 + β2 + f )Σ2 − 2f γΣ + f 2 − β2 = 0 , (B.18) in which Σc is a double root. It can thus be divided by (Σ − Σc)2, leading to the quadratic equation (cid:18) 1 (cid:19) Σc − γ Σ 2 Σ2 + 1 4 (cid:18) 3 P2(Σ) = + Σ2 c + f + β2 − 2γΣc + γ2 4 (cid:19) = 0 . (B.19) This equation has always two real solutions, provided that Σc exists (that is, in zones A, B or C). These solutions are (cid:113) −β2 + β(cid:112) Σ± = 2γ − Σc ± 2 where we replaced f by its expression (18) in terms of Σc. 1 − Σ2 c , (B.20) Appendix C: Second-order resonances Using the intermediary Hamiltonian X = εX1 (31), the Hamiltonian in the new coordinates is obtained term by term from Eq. (28). The two first terms are simple: we have H0 = H0 (given at Eq. 11) and H1 = 0 by definition of X . The second-order term is more complex since it re- quires to compute Poisson's brackets. Using of the fact that {X1,H0} = −H1 and reorganising the terms adequately, we 4 After having computed one solution Σ0, this information is retrieved by checking the sign of −Σ2 0/2 + γΣ0 − f. Article number, page 18 of 23 2X(νj + νk) − j<k − α(1 − X 2)νjνk M(cid:88) (νj + αX)2 − νjνkSjSk + α(1 − X 2) (cid:105) 2Xνjνk νj + αX − α(1 − X 2)νjνk (cid:104) (νk + αX)2 (cid:105) (νj + αX)2 1 1 2Xνjνk νk + αX cos(φj − φk) cos(φj + φk + 2ψ) + (νk + αX)2 ν2 j S2 j + α(1 − X 2) (νj + αX)2 cos(2φj + 2ψ) . j<k M(cid:88) j=1 (C.1) Since by hypothesis there is no first-order resonance in the system, the only possible resonant angles at second order are of the form σ = φj + φk + 2ψ. Let us perform the canonical change of coordinates (cid:32) σ and(cid:32) Σ γ1 γ2 (cid:33) (cid:33) = = Γ1 Γ2 −2 1 0 (cid:32) (cid:32) 1 −1 1 1 0 −1 −2 −1 1 0 1 (cid:33)(cid:32) (cid:33) (cid:33)(cid:32) X −ψ φj φk , (cid:33) 0 0 1 −3 . Φj Φk (C.2) (C.3) Assuming that σ is the only resonant angle, the dynamics at second order is given by averaging H over all other angles (this is another change of coordinates close to identity). The momenta Γ1 and Γ2 become arbitrary constants of motion that we will conveniently choose equal to zero. Dropping the unnecessary constants, the resonant Hamiltonian is thus M(cid:88) i=1 ν2 i S2 i νi + αX νiS2 i − 2X νj + νk X 2 M(cid:88) F(Σ, σ) = − 3 4 − αX 2 N(cid:88) i=1 α 2 E2 X 2 − M(cid:88) i + 2X − α(1 − X 2) (νi + αX)2 i=1 i=1 ν2 i S2 i (cid:18) + α(1 − X 2)νjνkSjSk 1 (νj + αX)2 + 1 (νk + αX)2 (cid:19) cos σ M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets (C.4) in which X must be replaced by −2Σ. High-order reso- nances are quite thin, so it is enough to consider the dy- namics in the neighbourhood of the resonance centre at first order: (average plus oscillating part) for which the expression is given by (C.1). The homological equation for order 2 is then {X2,H0} + A2 = A2 , (D.4) which defines the Hamiltonian X2. This leads to N(cid:88) (cid:104) j<k 2X(νj + νk) − 2Xνjνk νj + αX − 2Xνjνk νk + αX 3 2 ε2X2 = − M(cid:88) + j<k − αX 2 EjEk µj − µk sin(θj − θk) SjSk νj − νk α(1 − X 2)νjνk M(cid:88) (νj + αX)2 − + α(1 − X 2) j<k + M(cid:88) j=1 + 1 2 α(1 − X 2) νjνkSjSk (cid:104) α(1 − X 2)νjνk (νk + αX)2 (cid:105) 1 (νk + αX)2 ν2 j S2 j (νj + αX)3 sin(2φj + 2ψ) . (cid:105) 1 sin(φj − φk) sin(φj + φk + 2ψ) νj + νk + 2αX (νj + αX)2 (D.5) We must now compute the remainders at order 3. First of all, we can simplify their expressions by taking into account that, by definition: {X1,H0} = −H1, {X2,H0} = −(cid:102)A2 and {X1,H1} = 2(A2 − H2). We have then (C.5) σ = ∂F ∂Σ = −4αΣ + νj + νk + O(ε2) = 0 νj + νk , 4α ⇐⇒ Σ0 = or equivalently X0 = −2Σ0 = −(νj +νk)/(2α). Considering that X − X0 = O(ε), we have then (X − X0)2 + αK cos σ , F(Σ, σ) = − in which we dropped the unnecessary constants, and where (cid:19) (cid:18) (C.6) α 2 νjνkSjSk . (C.7) K = 8 (νj − νk)2 (νj + νk)2 1 − 4α2 By injecting the momentum Σ instead of X and by using the modified time dτ = −4αdt, we obtain F(Σ, σ) = This is the Hamiltonian of a pendulum of centre Σ0 and K. In terms of the obliquity cosine X, the half width (cid:112) (Σ − Σ0)2 − resonance has position X0 and half width 2 (cid:112) (C.8) cos σ . K 4 1 2 K. Appendix D: Third-order resonances If there is no resonance at first and second orders, we can use a canonical change of coordinates close to identity in order to suppress the angular dependency at first and sec- ond orders. Let us consider an intermediary Hamiltonian X = εX1 + ε2X2, such that the new coordinates are given by its flow at time 1. The Hamiltonian in the new coordi- nates is then H = H0 + ε H1 + ε2 H2 + ε3 H3 + O(ε4) , where H0 = H0 H1 = H1 + {X1,H0} H2 = H2 + {X2,H0} + {X1,H1} + H3 = H3 + {X1,H2} + {X2,H1} + 1 2{X1,{X1,H0}} 1 2{X1,{X2,H0}} (D.1) + + 1 2{X2,{X1,H0}} + 1 6{X1,{X1,{X1,H0}}} . 1 2{X1,{X1,H1}} (D.2) The first-order part of X required to suppress the angular dependency at order 1 can be directly taken from Eq. (31). Let us write A2 = H2 + {X1,H1} + 2{X1,{X1,H0}} = A2 +(cid:102)A2 1 H3 = H3 + 6{X1,(cid:102)A2} + 1 (D.3) + 2 3{X1,A2} , 1 3{X1,H2} + 1 2{X2,H1} (D.6) Article number, page 19 of 23 A&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin ν3 j S3 j (νj + αX)4 cos(3φj + 3ψ) ν2 j νkS2 j Sk Ajk + djk + ejk and: Ajk = Bjk = 3(νj + αX)3(νk + αX)3 − cjk (cid:32) (νj − νk)2 1 3(νj + αX)2 1 + αX νj + αX + 5 4 α2(1 − X 2) (νj + αX)2 Cijk = 2νi − νj (νi + νk)(νi + νj − νk + αX) (νi − νk)(νj + αX) (νi + νj)(νi + νk − νj + αX) (cid:16) − νk + νiνjνk − eij − eik + (νi − νj)(νk + αX) (cid:17) dji + dki + 2αXbjk + α2(1 − X 2)cjk . 2 − 2αX xjk − α2(1 − X 2) yjk 3(νj + αX)(νk + αX) (D.9) (cid:33) (D.10) The expression of the coefficients Dj is very complex. We will not give it here since they have no interest at this stage (the angles φj + ψ are non resonant by hypothesis). As shown in Appendix C, in the pendulum approxima- tion, the half-width of any possible resonance is two times the square root of its coefficient divided by α, and its po- sition is given by the combination of the unperturbed fre- quencies. Accordingly, the possible resonances at order 3 are gathered in Table 1. Appendix E: Geršgorin circles In order to prove that the Lagrange-Laplace matrix for the orbital inclinations has only negative or zero eigenvalues, one can use the Geršgorin circle theorem (see Geršgorin 1931 or Varga 2004). This theorem is recalled below, and we show how it applies to our matrix. Definition. Let B be a complex N ×N matrix with elements (bij). The ith "Geršgorin disc" Gi (i = 1, 2..N ) is the closed disc of the complex plane centred at bii and with radius bij . (E.1) Theorem (Geršgorin 1931). Any eigenvalue of B lies inside at least one of the Gi discs, i = 1, 2..N. Corollary. All the eigenvalues of B are located inside the union of the Gi discs, i = 1, 2..N. In our case, the matrix B is real (see Eq. 35). It has only real eigenvalues and one of them is identically equal to zero. Moreover, given the very particular form of this matrix, the centre of each Geršgorin disc is located on the real line, with an abscissa equal to the opposite of its radius. Therefore, all the eigenvalues of B are negative or zero, as illustrated in Fig. E.1. (D.8) Ri = N(cid:88) j=1 j(cid:54)=i which gives (cid:105) M(cid:88) (cid:104) j=1 ε H3 = Dj cos(φj + ψ) M(cid:88) α2(1 − X 2)3/2 M(cid:88) M(cid:88) j=1 3 4 − + α2(1 − X 2)3/2 j=1 k=1 k(cid:54)=j (cid:104) (cid:105) (cid:105) (cid:105) (cid:112) (cid:112) + + 4(νj + αX)4 cos(2φj + φk + 3ψ) 3 (cid:104) M(cid:88) − M(cid:88) j=1 k=1 k(cid:54)=j 1 − X 2 S2 j Sk ν2 j νkBjk + νk + νj M(cid:88) (νj + νk)(νk + αX) (νj − νk)(νj + αX) Cijk M(cid:88) SiSjSk (cid:104) 1 − X 2 cos(2φj − φk + ψ) i=1 j<k j,k(cid:54)=i M(cid:88) × cos(−φi + φj + φk + ψ) νiνjνkSiSjSk Aij + Ajk + Aik cos(φi + φj + φk + 3ψ) (cid:104) (cid:104) νiSiEjEk 1 νi + αX + α2(1 − X 2)3/2 (cid:112) + 3 2 αX 1 − X 2 i<j<k M(cid:88) N(cid:88) i=1 j=1 (cid:105) N(cid:88) k=1 k(cid:54)=j 1 (cid:105) µj − µk cos(φi + θj − θk + ψ) (D.7) − 1 where xjk = yjk = zjk = bjk = cjk = djk = 1 νj + αX + 1 νk + αX 1 (νj + αX)2 + (νk + αX)2 1 (νj + αX)3 + 1 (νk + αX)3 yjk νj + νk + 2αX bjk + zjk νj + νk + 2αX 1 (cid:32) 3(νj + αX)(νk + αX) α2(1 − X 2) (νk + αX)2 + α2(1 − X 2) (νj + αX)2 − + 1 + 2αX νj + αX − 2αX νk + αX (cid:33) α2(1 − X 2) (νj + αX)(νk + αX) ejk = −xjk + 2αX yjk + α2(1 − X 2) zjk νj − νk Article number, page 20 of 23 M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets Table F.1. Quasi-periodic representation of the orbital dynam- ics of Mercury. Fig. E.1. Geršgorin discs in the complex plane corresponding to the Lagrange-Laplace matrix B for three planets. The centre of the circles are the diagonal entries of B (red spots). Every eigenvalue of B lies on the real line, inside the union of all the discs. Appendix F: Orbital solution used for the inner Solar System In order to apply our method to a given planet, we first need a quasi-periodic approximation of its long-term orbital dynamics. In the case of the Solar System, the search for such series has been a challenge for centuries, eventually leading to very complete solutions (up to the degree of chaos inherent to the system). In the present work, we use the solution of Laskar (1990), obtained by multiplying the normalised proper modes z• i (Tables VI and VII of Laskar 1990) by the matrix S corresponding to the linear part of the solution (Table V of Laskar 1990). In the series obtained, the terms with the same combination of frequencies are then merged together, finally resulting in 56 terms in eccentricity and 60 terms in inclination. i and ζ• These series are given in Tables F.1-F.4 for the inner planets, under the form: z = e exp(i) = ζ = sin I 2 exp(iΩ) = Ej exp(cid:2)i(µjt + θ(0) j )(cid:3) Sj exp(cid:2)i(νjt + φ(0) j )(cid:3) , N(cid:88) M(cid:88) j=1 j=1 (F.1) with N = 56 and M = 60. They are used in Fig. 3 of the present work. µj ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) 5.59644 5.47449 5.71670 4.24882 5.35823 7.45592 4.36906 5.99227 5.65485 6.93423 5.23841 7.05595 7.34103 17.91550 7.57299 17.36469 6.82468 16.81285 3.08952 18.46794 7.20563 17.08266 17.63081 7.71663 28.22069 17.81084 19.01870 17.15752 18.18553 17.72293 18.01611 16.52731 17.47683 16.26122 17.55234 5.40817 18.08627 52.19257 −19.72306 4.89647 0.66708 1.93168 3.60029 −56.90922 53.35188 29.37998 2.97706 −20.88236 28.86795 27.57346 1.82121 27.06140 76.16447 0.77840 51.03334 −0.49216 z Ej×108 18337396 6902428 5240271 3635276 2815900 2786428 1312738 1035633 998897 934569 829067 634974 235292 165568 164186 157893 77097 70120 60554 48514 48115 43934 39761 29983 21356 15980 15738 15119 14604 12073 10275 9115 7950 7118 6398 6086 5933 3589 2363 922 717 618 447 400 285 169 158 75 70 62 50 45 16 12 9 4 νj ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) (o) θ(0) j −5.61755 110.35 −7.07963 275.01 −7.19493 120.52 −6.96094 30.67 −5.50098 94.89 20.24 0.00000 −6.84091 220.84 −7.33264 113.56 −5.85017 39.22 −5.21610 166.16 −5.37178 272.97 −5.10025 357.62 −6.73842 27.85 −7.40536 335.25 −7.48780 191.47 −6.56016 303.95 −5.96899 14.53 −8.42342 91.98 −3.00557 121.36 9.97 −18.85115 −6.15490 323.91 359.38 −17.74818 −0.69189 202.03 18.14984 273.52 307.83 −18.30007 58.56 −19.40256 39.75 −19.13075 145.02 −26.33023 57.28 −18.01114 48.46 −17.66094 44.83 −17.83857 311.91 −17.54636 80.26 −18.97001 −2.35835 58.89 17.65 −17.94404 120.60 −18.59563 −1.84625 356.17 −4.16482 225.59 113.24 −18.69743 292.23 −18.77933 73.98 −18.22681 39.55 −19.06544 121.40 −17.19656 −3.11725 44.11 −0.58033 134.98 −1.19906 37.61 11.50319 306.81 203.93 −26.97744 212.64 −50.30212 0.46547 223.74 10.34389 146.09 20.96631 38.56 0.57829 323.03 65.10 82.77163 9.18847 136.30 58.80017 164.74 34.82788 −27.48935 −25.17116 −28.13656 ζ Sj×108 3995819 3015900 1505361 1429554 1424811 1372386 1183049 872607 481844 360659 358805 351141 285961 264351 245583 230801 205822 192248 159813 156874 149031 119892 70222 53922 47541 33322 14506 13964 9092 8620 7011 6248 6027 4687 4398 4035 3435 3303 3167 3104 3100 2777 1298 1067 683 372 341 244 202 196 179 132 68 61 39 36 28 18 17 11 (o) φ(0) j 348.70 273.77 105.16 97.95 342.89 107.59 107.89 196.75 165.47 18.91 35.48 195.38 44.50 233.35 47.95 303.47 350.64 211.21 140.33 240.43 89.77 303.28 23.96 111.19 269.86 29.01 125.90 127.29 62.09 318.93 109.13 66.71 253.36 44.73 32.26 278.11 41.72 51.62 41.70 42.83 226.30 230.21 127.26 326.97 17.33 133.87 281.02 44.61 29.83 286.88 191.52 57.78 103.72 128.95 1.15 212.90 294.12 218.53 215.94 314.08 Notes. This representation is used in Fig. 3. It has been directly obtained from Laskar (1990), see text. Article number, page 21 of 23 00imaginarypartrealpartTable F.2. Quasi-periodic representation of the orbital dynam- ics of Venus. Table F.3. Quasi-periodic representation of the orbital dynam- ics of the Earth. A&A proofs: manuscript no. secularspin z µj ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) Ej×108 2085594 7.45592 1963621 4.24882 1346128 17.91550 17.36469 1164633 659312 5.59644 324058 17.08266 248173 5.47449 239435 16.81285 6.93423 216696 191660 17.63081 188411 5.71670 178786 7.05595 176112 7.34103 129713 17.81084 7.57299 122891 118540 18.18553 116085 19.01870 111520 17.15752 110955 18.46794 5.35823 101244 97999 17.72293 83405 18.01611 67232 16.52731 58638 17.47683 57777 16.26122 6.82468 57706 54138 3.08952 48156 18.08627 47190 17.55234 37236 5.99227 36013 7.20563 5.65485 35915 29809 5.23841 22441 7.71663 20218 4.36906 28.22069 16949 5.40817 3036 −19.72306 1161 1088 0.66708 536 27.06140 470 4.89647 416 29.37998 52.19257 339 277 28.86795 27.57346 244 242 3.60029 −56.90922 216 2.97706 141 69 1.93168 −20.88236 67 63 76.16447 46 1.82121 35 51.03334 0.77840 19 16 53.35188 −0.49216 5 νj ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) (o) θ(0) j 0.00000 200.24 30.67 −18.85115 −5.61755 335.25 123.95 −17.74818 −7.07963 110.35 179.38 −18.30007 −5.50098 275.01 −6.84091 274.43 −7.19493 169.77 −6.96094 193.67 120.52 −19.40256 −7.33264 358.98 −3.00557 207.85 58.56 −19.13075 −5.85017 11.47 −0.69189 57.28 −5.21610 219.75 −5.37178 325.02 −5.10025 6.95 94.89 −18.01114 48.46 −17.66094 −6.73842 44.83 131.91 −18.97001 −7.40536 260.26 −5.96899 58.89 194.53 −17.83857 −7.48780 121.36 −6.56016 356.17 197.65 −17.54636 −8.42342 113.56 −6.15490 143.91 39.22 −17.94404 272.97 −18.59563 93.52 −18.69743 220.79 −18.77933 308.38 −18.22681 120.48 −19.06544 113.24 −17.19656 18.14984 73.98 218.72 −26.33023 −2.35835 291.97 −1.84625 217.51 −4.16482 225.73 −3.11725 32.64 −0.58033 43.74 121.40 −50.30212 44.11 11.50319 −1.19906 306.81 93.94 0.46547 203.93 −26.97744 10.34389 143.03 20.96631 148.00 0.57829 316.30 65.10 9.18847 82.77163 135.62 58.80017 164.74 34.82788 −27.48935 −25.17116 −28.13656 ζ Sj×108 1377170 953835 671575 575205 404368 298364 239467 208804 201837 191673 188959 116984 99208 88217 80983 65885 60616 60304 59016 43620 41358 38337 36654 35440 34592 33636 32924 30942 29977 25773 25048 21099 19361 19259 18879 18853 16888 11902 9063 5577 2677 2187 2022 663 641 215 212 194 184 128 98 82 64 36 24 14 11 7 7 5 (o) φ(0) j 107.59 60.43 348.70 123.28 93.77 89.80 342.89 286.39 285.16 277.95 209.10 16.75 140.33 305.90 165.47 23.96 18.91 35.48 195.38 242.09 138.93 224.50 73.36 53.35 350.64 289.13 227.95 123.47 246.71 31.21 89.77 212.26 98.11 221.70 222.83 46.30 50.21 171.81 111.19 127.29 44.72 40.13 51.60 326.97 17.33 29.83 281.02 133.77 286.88 44.89 191.39 57.78 103.72 1.15 128.95 212.90 294.12 218.53 215.94 314.08 z µj ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) Ej×108 1891285 4.24882 1614222 7.45592 1315949 17.91550 17.36469 938579 420011 5.59644 261159 17.08266 197777 17.63081 168931 28.22069 16.81285 168064 161978 6.93423 158097 5.47449 136309 7.34103 134274 7.05595 131495 18.46794 17.81084 126776 120026 5.71670 115855 18.18553 95780 17.72293 95116 7.57299 19.01870 93553 89874 17.15752 81516 18.01611 64497 5.35823 56656 3.08952 56468 16.26122 16.52731 54183 47256 17.47683 47065 18.08627 44664 6.82468 38030 17.55234 27874 7.20563 5.99227 23721 22879 5.65485 18989 5.23841 17369 7.71663 9354 4.36906 52.19257 7041 2871 5.40817 29.37998 1761 1669 27.06140 −19.72306 1591 1259 0.66708 28.86795 1027 902 27.57346 584 53.35188 447 4.89647 76.16447 233 3.60029 233 −56.90922 208 148 2.97706 51.03334 129 70 1.93168 −20.88236 70 1.82121 49 22 0.77840 −0.49216 6 νj ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) (o) θ(0) j 0.00000 30.67 200.24 −18.85115 −5.61755 155.25 303.95 −17.74818 −7.07963 110.35 359.38 −18.30007 −5.50098 14.78 −6.84091 128.09 −7.19493 95.11 −6.96094 169.87 275.01 −19.40256 207.85 −26.33023 −7.33264 359.01 −3.00557 187.69 238.56 −19.13075 −0.69189 120.52 −5.85017 237.28 −5.21610 228.46 −5.37178 11.47 −5.10025 39.75 145.02 −18.97001 −6.73842 224.83 94.89 −18.01114 −7.40536 121.36 238.89 −17.66094 −7.48780 311.91 −6.56016 80.26 176.17 −17.19656 −5.96899 194.53 17.65 −17.83857 −8.42342 143.91 113.56 −17.54636 −6.15490 39.22 272.97 −18.69743 93.52 −18.77933 220.76 −18.22681 225.56 −19.06544 120.45 −17.94404 37.54 −18.59563 18.14984 38.70 −2.35835 113.24 −1.84625 73.98 −4.16482 212.64 223.74 −26.97744 −0.58033 134.92 −3.11725 291.91 82.77163 323.03 121.40 58.80017 34.82788 44.11 306.81 11.50319 0.46547 136.30 148.98 −27.48935 −1.19906 203.93 148.46 −25.17116 65.10 −28.13656 10.34389 164.74 20.96631 0.57829 9.18847 −50.30212 ζ Sj×108 1377263 875509 496020 401987 343071 281401 176869 174079 171242 162618 162229 133519 99249 89258 80968 64554 59814 44770 44540 43589 33642 32525 30484 30067 28903 27932 26251 25667 25550 23507 21866 20949 18500 17676 17327 17304 15500 14745 13530 6694 2098 1981 1812 1074 628 596 581 341 269 191 181 173 167 163 108 85 74 62 36 25 (o) φ(0) j 107.59 240.43 348.70 303.28 93.77 269.74 342.89 286.47 285.16 277.95 29.19 127.29 16.75 140.33 125.90 23.96 165.47 18.91 35.48 195.38 253.36 224.50 62.09 53.35 318.93 227.95 123.47 341.65 350.64 109.13 31.21 66.71 89.77 41.70 42.83 226.30 230.21 32.26 278.11 111.19 44.69 39.73 51.59 43.23 17.33 326.97 128.95 212.90 294.12 281.02 286.88 218.53 133.74 215.94 314.08 191.35 57.78 103.72 1.15 29.78 Notes. This representation is used in Fig. 3. It has been directly obtained from Laskar (1990), see text. Notes. This representation is used in Fig. 3. It has been directly obtained from Laskar (1990), see text. Article number, page 22 of 23 M. Saillenfest et al.: Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets Table F.4. Quasi-periodic representation of the orbital dynam- ics of Mars. z µj ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) Ej×108 4902750 17.91550 4004873 17.36469 2030021 4.24882 16.81285 1853846 1357476 18.46794 1139332 17.63081 1114353 17.08266 706337 28.22069 17.81084 472390 431698 18.18553 399188 19.01870 383488 17.15752 356895 17.72293 303744 18.01611 7.45592 295700 231195 16.52731 210411 16.26122 201641 17.47683 175373 18.08627 17.55234 162274 73627 3.08952 26717 52.19257 25209 6.93423 24970 7.34103 21406 7.05595 7.57299 17424 8182 6.82468 8059 29.37998 8027 27.06140 6750 5.59644 5106 7.20563 28.86795 4795 4212 27.57346 7.71663 3182 3180 4.36906 −19.72306 3055 5.40817 2931 2541 5.47449 2250 53.35188 2008 0.66708 1929 5.71670 1090 76.16447 5.35823 1037 605 51.03334 464 4.89647 381 5.99227 368 5.65485 5.23841 305 3.60029 250 227 1.93168 −56.90922 223 192 2.97706 −20.88236 91 1.82121 65 35 0.77840 −0.49216 10 (o) νj ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) θ(0) j 335.25 −17.74818 303.95 −18.85115 0.00000 30.67 91.90 −18.30007 9.91 −17.19656 201.65 −26.33023 359.38 −18.01114 128.11 −17.66094 58.56 −17.83857 57.28 −17.54636 39.75 −19.13075 145.02 −17.94404 48.46 −18.59563 −5.61755 44.83 200.24 −19.40256 −7.07963 311.91 −3.00557 58.89 −0.69189 80.26 356.17 −18.97001 −6.84091 17.65 −7.19493 121.36 −5.50098 225.55 −6.96094 170.37 207.85 −18.69743 359.16 −18.77933 11.47 −18.22681 194.53 −19.06544 −7.33264 37.54 −5.85017 38.70 −5.21610 110.35 −5.37178 143.91 −5.10025 212.64 −6.73842 223.74 −7.40536 93.52 −7.48780 40.88 −6.56016 113.24 −5.96899 120.37 −8.42342 275.01 −6.15490 134.91 73.98 −26.97744 120.52 82.77163 −1.84625 323.03 18.14984 94.89 −4.16482 136.30 58.80017 291.74 113.56 34.82788 −2.35835 39.22 −0.58033 272.97 121.40 −27.48935 192.09 −25.17116 44.11 −50.30212 −3.11725 306.81 203.93 −28.13656 0.46547 149.54 11.50319 65.10 −1.19906 164.74 0.57829 20.96631 10.34389 9.18847 ζ Sj×108 3464962 1541097 1375324 745752 543058 457927 262761 249135 202620 180575 142530 127098 116625 105161 85957 77142 63897 60870 59221 38863 38505 37498 36566 31116 30502 30460 27285 22307 12681 9492 9443 9241 7310 6758 6278 5900 5417 4915 3922 3471 1993 1457 1419 1278 1169 924 628 592 592 559 458 427 371 170 136 96 59 53 52 33 (o) φ(0) j 303.28 60.43 107.59 89.07 154.89 127.29 62.09 318.93 109.13 66.71 305.90 32.26 278.11 348.70 23.33 93.77 140.33 23.96 73.36 286.50 285.16 342.89 277.95 221.70 222.83 46.30 50.21 16.75 165.47 18.91 35.48 195.38 224.50 53.35 227.95 123.47 350.64 31.21 89.77 43.07 128.95 38.22 111.19 51.57 212.90 294.12 44.46 17.33 218.53 215.94 209.84 326.97 314.08 286.88 281.02 133.57 103.72 57.78 191.16 1.15 Notes. This representation is used in Fig. 3. It has been directly obtained from Laskar (1990), see text. Article number, page 23 of 23
1811.09276	1	1811	2018-11-22T19:00:01	Morphology of Hydrodynamic Winds: A Study of Planetary Winds in Stellar Environments	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Bathed in intense ionizing radiation, close-in gaseous planets undergo hydrodynamic atmospheric escape, which ejects the upper extent of their atmospheres into the interplanetary medium. Ultraviolet detections of escaping gas around transiting planets corroborate such a framework. Exposed to the stellar environment, the outflow is shaped by its interaction with the stellar wind and by the planet's orbit. We model these effects using Athena to perform 3-D radiative-hydrodynamic simulations of tidally-locked hydrogen atmospheres receiving large amounts of ionizing extreme-ultraviolet flux in various stellar environments for the low-magnetic-field case. Through a step-by-step exploration of orbital and stellar wind effects on the planetary outflow, we find three structurally distinct stellar wind regimes: weak, intermediate, and strong. We perform synthetic Lyman-$\alpha$ observations and find unique observational signatures for each regime. A weak stellar wind$\textrm{---}$which cannot confine the planetary outflow, leading to a torus of material around the star$\textrm{---}$has a pre-transit, red-shifted dayside arm and a slightly redward-skewed spectrum during transit. The intermediate regime truncates the dayside outflow at large distances from the planet and causes periodic disruptions of the outflow, producing observational signatures that mimic a double transit. The first of these dips is blue-shifted and precedes the optical transit. Finally, strong stellar winds completely confine the outflow into a cometary tail and accelerate the outflow outwards, producing large blue-shifted signals post-transit. Across all three regimes, large signals occur far outside of transit, offering motivation to continue ultraviolet observations outside of direct transit.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MORPHOLOGY OF HYDRODYNAMIC WINDS: A STUDY OF PLANETARY WINDS IN STELLAR ENVIRONMENTS1 John R. McCann1,2 , Ruth A. Murray-Clay2 , Kaitlin Kratter3 , and Mark R. Krumholz4 1Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA; [email protected] 2Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA 3Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA 4Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia (Received September 11, 2018; Revised November 26, 2018) Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal ABSTRACT Bathed in intense ionizing radiation, close-in gaseous planets undergo hydrodynamic atmospheric escape, which ejects the upper extent of their atmospheres into the interplanetary medium. Ultraviolet detections of escaping gas around transiting planets corroborate such a framework. Exposed to the stellar environment, the outflow is shaped by its interaction with the stellar wind and by the planet's orbit. We model these effects using Athena to perform 3-D radiative-hydrodynamic simulations of tidally-locked hydrogen atmospheres receiving large amounts of ionizing extreme-ultraviolet flux in various stellar environments for the low-magnetic-field case. Through a step-by-step exploration of orbital and stellar wind effects on the planetary outflow, we find three structurally distinct stellar wind regimes: weak, intermediate, and strong. We perform synthetic Lyman-α observations and find unique observational signatures for each regime. A weak stellar wind -- which cannot confine the planetary outflow, leading to a torus of material around the star -- has a pre-transit, red-shifted dayside arm and a slightly redward-skewed spectrum during transit. The intermediate regime truncates the dayside outflow at large distances from the planet and causes periodic disruptions of the outflow, producing observational signatures that mimic a double transit. The first of these dips is blue-shifted and precedes the optical transit. Finally, strong stellar winds completely confine the outflow into a cometary tail and accelerate the outflow outwards, producing large blue-shifted signals post-transit. Across all three regimes, large signals occur far outside of transit, offering motivation to continue ultraviolet observations outside of direct transit. Keywords: hydrodynamics, planet -- star interactions, planets and satellites: atmospheres, planets and satellites: gaseous planets 1. INTRODUCTION Atmospheric escape plays a key role in the evolution of planetary bodies. At their most extreme, processes that drive escape from the upper atmosphere may sub- stantially transform the atmospheric composition of a body over its lifetime. The importance of this mech- anism is underscored by the recent confirmation that for short-period exoplanets the radius distribution has a gap near 1.8 R⊕ (Fulton 2017). The gap's existence was predicted prior to its discovery as a consequence of the complete erosion of lower-mass planets' atmospheres by photoionization-driven atmospheric escape (Owen and Wu 2013; Lopez and Fortney 2013). While evidence of atmospheric evolution thus appears imprinted on planet demographics, observations of contemporary at- mospheric escape in the regimes governing these popula- tions are limited, making model validation difficult. Loss from highly-irradiated planets typically occurs through hydrodynamic outflows, rather than via the kinetic loss mechanisms that currently dominate for Solar System planets. Here, we explore the most approachable systems for which improved observational constraints on hydro- dynamic escape can be obtained -- hot Jupiters. Ultraviolet observations of the hot Jupiter HD 209458 b have found up to a 15 % occultation in the wings of hydrogen Lyman-α, with effective Doppler shifts of up 1 This pdf contains animated figures (Figures 2, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, and 19) viewable by doubling clicking in Adobe Acrobat Pro. Otherwise available at https://gitlab.com/athena ae/athena ae. to ±150 km s−1, significantly larger than the 5 % occul- tation observed at optical (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2003; Ben-Jaffel 2007; Vidal-Madjar et al. 2008; Ehrenreich et al. 2008). The high occultation and large velocity are indicative of a fast and extended component of the atmosphere, interpreted as an escaping planetary wind. Similar outflows have been reported for another hot and one warm Jupiter: HD 189733 b (Lecavelier des Etangs et al. 2010; Bourrier et al. 2013), and 55 Cnc b (Ehren- reich et al. 20122); and for one hot Neptunian planet, GJ 435 b (Kulow et al. 2014; Ehrenreich et al. 2015; Bour- rier et al. 2016; Lavie et al. 2017). Interestingly, the outflow from GJ 435 b is asymmetric both temporally and spectrally,3 suggesting a cometary-tail-like outflow moving rapidly away from the star. Tentative detections indicate that metals may be present in these escaping winds, including oxygen (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2004; Ben- Jaffel and Hosseini 2010), magnesium (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2013), and carbon and silicon (Linsky et al. 2010; Lyod et al. 2017). Additionally, hydrogen Hα absorp- tion has been seen in HD 189733 b's transmission spectra (Jensen et al. 2012), but its relation to hydrodynamic es- cape is still uncertain (Barnes et al. 2016). Recently, the outflow from Wasp-107 b was detected in the 1083 nm 3 Redshifted 2 Along with a non-detection for a super Earth, 55 Cnc e, placing an upper limit on its mass loss. (0.7 ± 3.6) % pre-transit occultation and (8.0 ± 3.1) % post-transit. Blueshifted occultation of (17.6 ± 5.2) % pre-transit and (47.2 ± 4.1) % post-transit (Ehren- reich et al. 2015). of line of excited neutral helium (Spake et al. 2018). This line, predicted for exoplanet atmospheres by Seager and Sasselov (2000), and in their outflows by Oklopci´c and Hirata (2018), provides an opportunity for ground-based observations. Current observations have only detected atmospheric escape for exoplanets with orbital periods less than 20 days. As these close-in planets receive large amounts of external heating, they are believed to be undergoing hy- drodynamic escape with outflow structures similar to a Parker wind (Parker 1958). In an attempt to model the observations, numerous one-dimensional hydrodynamic escape simulations have been produced (e.g., Yelle 2004; Garc`ıa Munoz 2007; Murray-Clay et al. 2009). Yet, out- flow velocities in these studies generally reach only tens of kilometers per second, comparable to the sound speed of the outflowing gas. Note that the temperature of the gas is limited by radiative cooling to less than a few times 104 K. To resolve inherently asymmetrical processes that cannot be modeled in 1-D and to investigate interactions between the outflowing wind and its environment that may produce high-velocity-offset neutral atoms, multidi- mensional simulations are needed. A number of authors have produced such simulations studying pieces of the problem, including dayside photoionization heating in 2- D (Owen and Adams 2014) and 3-D (Tripathi et al. 2015; Debrecht et al. in press), photoionization starting at the Hill radius (Schneiter et al 2016), stellar wind confine- ment in 2-D (Stone and Proga 2009; Tremblin and Chi- ang 2013) and 3-D (Bisikalo et al 2013), magnetic fields in 2-D (Trammell et al. 2014; Owen and Adams 2014) and 3-D (Cohen et al. 2011; Matsakos et al. 2015), and the possibility of developing a circumstellar torus from the planetary outflow in global 3-D simulations (Nellenback- Carroll et al. 2017). Through these simulations, several possibilities have been identified that have the potential to enhance occul- tation in the Lyman-α wings. One option is that given sufficiently high densities, absorption in the naturally- broadened line wings may be substantial enough that a large velocity offset between the gas and the planet is not required. For example, Trammell et al. (2014) demonstrated that HD 209458 b only needed a 50 G dipole field to explain the observations by producing a dense and extended equatorial dead zone -- a region where the outflow's ram pressure is insufficient to over- come the confining magnetic pressure. Likewise, stellar wind confinement may increase the column density by spatially restructuring the outflowing wind, generating a dense column where significant absorption in the line wings can occur (Stone and Proga 2009). Alternative options seek to increase occultation via Doppler broad- ening by generating a fast neutral population through additional physics. One such method is the interaction between a slow neutral planetary wind and a fast ion- ized stellar wind, which can produce energetic neutral atoms through charge exchange (Holmstrom et al. 2008). Furthermore, at the stellar-planetary wind interface, a Kelvin-Helmholtz instability will lead to stirring that in- creases the efficiency of charge exchange (Tremblin and Chiang 2013). Regardless of whether stellar wind confinement is the correct or entire explanation for these particular observa- tions, the stellar environment affects the structure of at- 2 McCann et al. mospheric outflows, with observational consequences. To investigate these consequences in 3-D, we take a bottom- up approach by deconstructing the stellar environment into three of its individual components -- the ionizing flux, tidal potential, and stellar wind. In doing so we can illuminate how each physical process translates into observable properties of the outflow, and how one would expect those signatures to vary for different conditions. Of the previous simulations, the most complete calcula- tion of stellar heating in 3-D was Tripathi et al. (2015), which self-consistently calculated ionization and heating of the gas. This self-consistent calculation is required to resolve the ionization structure of the planetary outflow, which is critical for synthetic observations. Otherwise, one must rely on previous work that has already done so for identical parameters, or assume approximate solu- tions for new parameters. Yet, while the simulations of Tripathi et al. (2015) did include tidal gravity, this study neglected the Corio- lis force, a stellar wind, and magnetic fields. Expanding upon Tripathi et al. (2015), we now seek to include stel- lar winds in a full-rotating frame. A concurrent study by Debrecht et al. (in press) includes Coriolis force (but no stellar wind or magnetic fields) and focuses on vary- ing planet mass and stellar flux. We defer exploration of magnetic fields, which should play a significant role in the outflow structure for fields above 1 G (Owen and Adams 2014), to future work. Though we focus on hot Jupiters, the concepts explored here should be applica- ble to a larger demographic, e.g., hot and warm gaseous planets. An overview of the goals, model, and setup in this work are presented in § 2. We provide a detailed description of the numerical methods and setup in § 3. Results are given in § 4, followed by a discussion of observational consequences in § 5. Future work and conclusions are discussed in § 6. 2. MODEL We aim to study the interaction between an escap- ing planetary atmosphere and its host star, in particular the star's stellar wind, gravitational force, and ionizing radiation. We will not consider atmospheres undergo- ing Roche lobe overflow or ablation by the stellar wind. Rather, our planetary winds will be self-consistently driven by the energy deposited, via photoionization heat- ing, in the planet's upper atmosphere. To this end, we use radiative hydrodynamics to model the evolution of an atmospheric outflow. To accurately track the evolution with hydrodynamics, it is necessary that the outflow remains in the collisional limit. We confirm this in post-processing with the eval- uation of the Knudsen number λ L , Kn = (1) where λ = (nσcol)−1 is the mean free path of gas particles with volumetric number density n, L = (∇ log P )−1 is the characteristic length scale of the flow, and P is the gas pressure. The collisional cross section, σcol is obtained by assuming the responsible collision mechanism for an individual population: Coulomb scattering for ion-ion in- teractions, and hardbody collisions for neutral-neutral or neutral-ion interactions.4 If one is only interested in the planetary evolution, e.g., mass-loss rate, it is sufficient for the outflow to remain collisional only to the sonic surface, where a Mach num- ber of one is achieved.5 However, we additionally seek to model the large-scale interaction with the stellar envi- ronment, which is always governed by the ambient con- ditions -- modeled here as a stellar wind. Moreover, there exist ambient conditions which impede the formation of a sonic surface, in which case the planetary evolution is also regulated by the ambient conditions. Therefore, we require the entire outflow to be sufficiently collisional to be properly modeled by hydrodynamics. Indeed, we find that within a few sonic radii, both the neutrals and the ions are well within the collisional limit. Farther out as the density decreases the neutrals become only marginally collisional, but are not dynamically or obser- vationally significant precisely because they reach such low densities. In § 2.1 we briefly describe all the physics taken into account in our models. For §2.2 we discuss the usefulness of Bernoulli's constant for analyzing these winds. In §2.3 we discuss the physical setup of the problem, and in § 2.4 we give intuition for the relevant length scales in our flows. 2.1. Physical processes 2.1.1. Radiative transfer for radiative hydrodynamics Our planetary winds are launched by photoionization heating from the host star. The frequency (ν) depen- dent optical depth to ionizing photons along a given ray, parametrized by s, is given as τν(s) = αν(s(cid:48)) ds(cid:48). (2) (cid:90) s s0 Here by definition τν(s0) = 0. In the work presented here, the opacities only come from neutral hydrogen ab- sorption, i.e., αν(s) = nHI(s) σν,HI, where nHI is the number density of neutral hydrogen. The near-ionization frequency-dependent cross section for photon absorption in neutral hydrogen is approximately (e.g., Draine 2011, § 13.1) (cid:18) ν (cid:19)−3 ν0 The ionization rate is then given by I = σHI nHI F0 e−τ . McCann et al. (5) The rate of photoionization heating is the ionization rate times the energy of the photoelectron released per ion- ization G = I Epe. (6) Here Epe = hν − IH, where h is Planck's constant and IH = 13.6 eV is the ionization threshold energy of hydro- gen. Within a comoving fluid parcel neutrals are repopu- lated only via recombination. Since we only follow the direct stellar ionizing radiation field, and not the diffuse field generated by recombinations, we will adopt case-B recombination. This is the appropriate case when opti- cally thick to ionization, as is the case where the wind is launched. Farther out in the flow, where the gas is al- most completely ionized, this may be inappropriate. In spite of this, we will ubiquitously adopt case-B, making the recombination rate R = αB nHII ne. (7) Here nHII is the number density of ionized hydrogen, ne is the number density of electrons, and we use an approx- imate form for αB = 2.59 × 10−13 (T /104 K)−0.7cm3 s−1 (Osterbrock 1989). Since the atmosphere is solely com- posed of hydrogen, we take the gas to be electrically neu- tral so that ne = nHII. We leave the question of metal cooling and entrainment in the winds for future work. While our flows near the planet are certainly opti- cally thick in Lyman-α, it is argued in Appendix C of Murray-Clay et al. (2009) that similar flows are suf- ficiently "thin" that Lyman-α emission is scattered into the line wings and escapes before being thermalized back into the fluid via collisions. Therefore, in our cooling rates we consider both Lyman-α emission from collision- ally excited neutral hydrogen and radiative recombina- tion emission L = Lrr + LLyα. (8) σν,HI ≈ 6.3 × 10−18 cm2. (3) The rate of energy loss from recombination is given by (Osterbrock 1989) For our simulations we implement the Verner et al. (1996) analytic fits to get more accurate cross sections. In our study, we will only consider ionizing monochro- matic light, without any radiation pressure. Therefore, we will now drop any ν subscripts. Taking the optical depth from the star to the edge of our simulation to be negligible, we equate the incoming photon number flux of the simulation, F0, with the photon number flux of the host star. Then the flux as a function of optical depth τ is F = F0 e−τ . (4) 4 Neutral-ion interactions are better modeled by induced dipole scattering and charge exchange, but we ignore those for simplicity and receive an upper bound for Kn. 5 As, neglecting any magnetic effects, conditions in a sonic region cannot propagate information to the subsonic region. 3 Lrr ≈ Λrr kB T 0.11 nHII ne. (9) The constant Λrr = 6.11 × 10−10 K0.89 cm3 s−1, and kB is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The rate of energy loss from Lyman-α is given by (Black 1981) LLyα = ΛLyα nHI ne e−118348 K/T . (10) Here ΛLyα = 7.5 × 10−19 erg cm3 s−1. Both the Lyman- α and recombination cooling are temperature-dependent, where the temperature is calculated as T = P nkB . (11) n =(cid:80) The variable n is the total number density of all species, s ns = nHI + nHII + ne. 2.1.2. Fluid equations In our simulations we solve the conservative form of the fluid equations: + (cid:126)∇ · (ρ(cid:126)u) = 0, ∂ρ ∂t (cid:17) ρ(cid:126)u ⊗ (cid:126)u + P = −ρ(cid:126)∇φ − 2ρ (cid:16)(cid:126)Ω × (cid:126)u (cid:17) (12) , (13) + (cid:126)∇ ·(cid:16) ∂ρ(cid:126)u ∂t + (cid:126)∇ · ((E + P ) (cid:126)u) = −ρ(cid:126)u · (cid:126)∇φ + G − L, ∂E ∂t ∂nHI ∂t + (cid:126)∇ · (nHI(cid:126)u) = R − I, E = ρ(cid:126)u · (cid:126)u + 1 2 P γ − 1 . (14) (15) (16) Here, ρ is the mass density of the gas, (cid:126)u is the bulk velocity, P is the isotropic pressure tensor with scalar value P , φ is the mechanical potential, (cid:126)Ω is the frame rotation vector, and γ is the adiabatic index, for which we will adopt γ = 5/3. Recall that (cid:126)u ⊗ (cid:126)u is the outer product of the velocity with itself, sometimes written as the dyadic product (cid:126)u(cid:126)u. Equations (12) to (14) have the familiar conservative forms on the left-hand side, with the relevant source terms for our problem on the right-hand side. For mass continuity there are no sources, momentum sources are external forces arising from the potential and the Cori- olis force, and for energy there is the change from ad- vecting through a potential field along with the energy gained and lost from radiative processes. Recall that the Coriolis force can do no work. Note that since the cen- trifugal force can be expressed as the gradient of a scalar potential, we place it in our mechanical potential, φ, as discussed in §2.3.1. The continuity equation for neutrals, Eq. (15), is similar to that for total density with recom- bination as a source and ionization as a sink. Note that in Eq. (16) we have used an ideal equation of state for a perfect gas. 2.2. Bernoulli constant Bernoulli's constant is a useful tool for analyzing our simulations, picking a stellar wind, and setting up the ini- tial conditions of the atmosphere. Lamers and Cassinelli (1999, § 4.1.1) provide a derivation of the Bernoulli con- stant for a spherically-symmetric wind; in § A.2 we pro- vide a generalized derivation along any streamline. For a reversible ideal gas the Bernoulli constant is b = 1 2 u2 + h + φ − ∆q, (17) where u is the bulk velocity, h is the enthalpy, φ is the mechanical potential and ∆q is the heat added to the fluid (see Appendix A). The heat flow along the path is given by the total local heating rate, G−L, and therefore ∆q can be expressed as (cid:90) ∆q = C(s) G − L ρu ds, (18) 4 McCann et al. where ρ is the density and C(s) is the streamline, param- eterized by s. Something that immediately becomes apparent from the Bernoulli constant is which parts of the domain are energetically forbidden. Consider a system in which there exists a surface defined by φz ≡ b + ∆q. At this surface, the kinetic energy and enthalpy have gone to zero (hence the subscript "z" in φz), and all the energy is necessarily in the potential energy. Thus, the fluid is bounded by this surface -- the absolute-zero-velocity sur- face. Therefore, a condition for an unbounded flow is that (b + ∆q) > φ at all points along its streamline. We use this criterion to help determine our initial condi- tions, picking only bounded planetary atmospheres and unbounded stellar winds. When a flow is unbounded it is meaningful to talk about its asymptotic velocity. For frames where both φ → 0 and h → 0 as r → ∞, the asymptotic velocity can be calculated as u∞ =(cid:112)2 (b + ∆q∞). (19) For an ideal gas, h → 0 is equivalent to T → 0. In prac- tice, as long as the flow is supersonic as r → ∞, Eq. (19) is approximately correct as u2∞ (cid:29) h∞ ≈ c2 s,∞, where cs,∞ is the sound speed as r → ∞. Here, the notation ∆q∞ reminds us that it includes all the energy injected into the wind out to infinity, where we have assumed that the differential heat flow is zero. 2.3. Physical setup 2.3.1. Reference frame We place our planet on a circular orbit and adopt a rotating reference frame in which the planet and star are at fixed locations. This frame centered on the barycenter, has the rotation vector given by the Third law of Kepler (cid:126)Ω = G(Mp + M(cid:63)) a3 z. (20) Here G is the Newtonian gravitational constant, M(cid:63) is the primary mass, Mp is the secondary mass, a is the semi-major axis of the secondary's orbit around the pri- mary, and the z -- axis is the axis of rotation. In such a frame the static potential is given by − 1 2 φ = − GMp − GM(cid:63) r(cid:63) Ω2 r2⊥, (21) r where, for a given point, r is the distance to the sec- ondary, r(cid:63) is the distance to the primary, and r⊥ is the distance to the barycenter projected into the orbital plane. 2.3.2. Initial Planetary atmosphere setup Within this reference frame we place a point mass to simulate the planet's core, on top of which sits an at- mosphere. As the wind is launched in the upper atmo- sphere of a planet, the gas is relatively dilute and warm enough to be well described as an ideal gas. We ignore any viscous dissipation, and take all processes to be re- versible. Absent any external energy input, the most stable solution of an atmosphere will be an adiabat. We thus construct an isentropic atmosphere that satisfies the (cid:114) polytropic relationship, P = KρΓ, with an polytropic ex- ponent, Γ, equal to the heat capacity ratio, γ. In reality the bolometric flux from the star drives the upper atmosphere of a planet to be approximately isothermal at the skin temperature (See § 3.6 of Pier- rehumbert 2010). Due to a lack of incorporating the bolometric flux in our simulation, and since Γ ≈ 1 is not an appropriate approximation throughout our simulation domain, e.g, in the ionized outflow, we use an isentropic atmosphere with the temperature at the base of the wind equal to the planet's skin temperature. McCann et al. Our atmosphere is contained well within the planet's Hill sphere, so for now we can ignore stellar gravity when calculating its analytical initial profile. Note that in practice we will use the full potential so that the at- mosphere is not technically spherically symmetric, but for simplicity of discussion we will assume such symme- try.6 Furthermore, we consider planets that are tidally locked to their host stars, and will ignore any rotational effects tending to make the atmosphere oblate. Under these conditions we require the atmosphere to be in hy- drostatic equilibrium. We ignore the gravitational effect of the gas itself, both analytically and numerically in our simulations.7 From Eqs. (17), (A14), and the adiabatic equation of state, an adiabatic atmosphere that is every- where static has a density profile (cid:20) (cid:21)1/(γ−1) (φp − φ(r)) hp ρ(r) = ρp 1 + . (22) Here variables with subscript "p" denote their value at the planetary surface, Rp, which we define to be the ra- dius where τ = 1. We emphasis that, τ = 1 at Rp is only the initial condition at time step zero in our simulations of our atmosphere. The optical depth to ionizing pho- tons at Rp is not fixed during the simulation, as the wind self-consistently picks its base. We pick the atmosphere's Bernoulli constant such that the atmosphere is bound, which is found by solving the equation φ = φp + hp.8 Since our atmosphere is (nearly) spherically symmetric we shall call this the zero radius, Rz, as all variables go to zero at this surface. This is often called the homentropic atmosphere since it is isentropic, with constant entropy along rays, and is spherically symmetric -- thus, of "the same entropy" everywhere throughout. For an ideal gas in a point mass potential this is equivalent to ρ(r) = ρp 1 + (γ − 1)GMp γ c2 s,p r − 1 Rp (cid:18) 1 (cid:19)(cid:21)1/(γ−1) (cid:20) Here cs,p is the isothermal speed of sound at Rp.9 6 See Figure 1, which shows the solution for the full non-spherical potential. Yet, by visual inspection the atmosphere is virtual spher- ically symmetric. 7 Thus while the atmosphere has a polytropic equation of state, it is not a polytrope as it is not a solution to the Lane-Edmen equation, i.e. no self-gravity, and there are an infinite number of analytic solutions. 8 Thus the relevant parameters are the radius, mass and skin temperature of the planet. For our simulations we pick parameters of numerically convenient hot Jupiters, see § 3.2.2 for more details. 9 Notice that from this equation, and the limit definition of e, s,p (1/r − 1/Rp)), which is the the limγ→1 ρ(r) = ρp exp(GMp/c2 profile of an isothermal atmosphere. Figure 1. The initial density profile of a hydrostatic atmosphere. Within the innermost circle, r < Rmask, the density is held to a constant value, ρmask. Between Rib and Rmask the density is held fixed at every time step to its original analytic hydrostatic solution. The radius of the planet, Rp, is where τ = 1 initially. The outermost circle, Re, is the edge of the atmosphere where the density tends to zero, past which is a low density, pressure matched ambient medium. Numerically fixed inner-boundary conditions, which are extrapolated from Eq. (22) with the initial condi- tions at Rp, are set at an inner boundary radius. The inner boundary, Rib, is deep enough within the atmo- sphere that conditions there do not affect the outflow. While we setup an initial atmosphere with predeter- mined conditions, the stellar flux boundary condition self-consistently evolves the atmosphere above τ = 1. Therefore, below τ = 1 our atmosphere is relatively static, and our model should not necessarily be consid- ered valid there -- even though it is far outside our inner boundary. Justification for the insensitivity of the solu- tion above τ = 1 to what lies below is given in Appendix A of Murray-Clay et al. (2009). See Figure 1 for the initial atmosphere with labeled radii. We note that our choice of Rp as the radius at which τ = 1 is not the same as the radius of the op- tical surface of the planet (as probed, for example, in optical transit measurements). We make this choice for Rp because our model is only valid beyond this radius. For typical hot Jupiters, the difference between the radii of the optical surface and the τ = 1 surface to ionizing photons is of order 10 % (Murray-Clay et al. 2009). . (23) 2.3.3. Ambient medium setup Ideally, conditions outside of the atmosphere would be those of a typical interplanetary medium, which for most star systems takes the form of a stellar wind. However, as we wish to break the stellar environment down into its components, in some simulations we do not include a stellar wind. When the stellar wind is absent, we in- stead use an ambient medium that is as low-density as numerically feasible and that is pressure matched to the outer edge of the planetary atmosphere. For numerical reasons we truncate the planetary atmosphere just prior to the zero radius (defined in § 2.3.2) at a radius we call the atmospheric edge, Re. Initially it is important that the ambient medium is both pressure matched to the numerical edge of our at- 5 ReRpRibRmaskmosphere, and that the ambient medium is itself pressure supported so it does not collapse onto the planet. This is accomplished with another hydrostatic atmosphere sim- ilar to Eq. (22) (cid:18) (cid:19)1/(γ−1) φa − φ(r) ha ρ(r) = ρa 1 + , r > Re. (24) Here the subscripts "a" denotes an ambient medium ref- erence variable, where the reference location is the am- bient medium/planetary atmosphere interface (Re). By design the ambient medium's reference density ρa < ρe -- the density of the atmosphere at Re. Thus by also requiring pressuring matching at the interface (φa = φe), Pa = Pe, so that ha > he. Since φz,a = φa + ha deter- mines the ambient absolute-zero-velocity surface, then the zero radius of the ambient medium is larger than the planetary atmosphere's bounding surface.10 Due to nu- merical considerations, a balancing act between too high or too low of values for ha (or relatedly ρa) occurs and is discussed in Appendix B. 2.3.4. Stellar wind setup When we seek to include the interplanetary medium in the form of a stellar wind, we set a stellar wind in- flow boundary condition and initialize our domain with that of a steady-state stellar wind instead of an ambient medium. One challenging aspect of our simulation is the injection of a realistic stellar wind. As our energy depo- sition into the planetary atmosphere is detailed, we use an adiabatic index of Γ = γ = 5/3 throughout the entire simulation. This differs from numerous previous simula- tions only in that we have no "hidden" energy injection or ad hoc redistribution built into our adiabatic index, such as an isothermal Parker Wind with Γ ≈ 1 (e.g., Stone & Proga 2009; Tremblin & Chaing 2013; Caroll- Nellenback et al. 2017). This means our fluid behaves isentropically in the absence of ionizing radiation. Typically, stellar wind models that do not resolve the heating sources use such "polytropes" (Γ ≈ 1). Unfor- tunately for our simulation, as discussed in § A.3, there is no transonic wind solution for a polytropic fluid with polytropic index Γ = 5/3. Note that, stellar wind mod- els which do resolve heating terms also use Γ = γ = 5/3, but include things such as: heat conduction, Alfv´en wave dissipation, resistive and viscous dissipation, or coronal heating sources (Miki´c et al. 1999). As our only en- ergy injection is from ionization, we cannot generate an optically thin transonic stellar wind without another en- ergy injection method, e.g., via magnetic fields as seen in Alfv´en-driven winds (Lamers & Cassinelli 1999, Ch. 10). Fortunately, by using the Bernoulli constant we can set the boundary conditions to induce a stellar wind that within the domain of our simulation mimics a transonic wind locally. The only catch is that the stellar wind is always sub- or supersonic (see § 3.2.2 for more details). Therefore, our stellar wind is modeled as a spherical isentropic wind,11 i.e., a "polytrope" with index Γ = γ 10 Since φz,a = φa + ha and φz,p = φp + hp = φe + he, but ha > he and φa = φe, then φz,a > φz,p or Rz,a > Rz,p. 11 Necessarily due to the fact that there is no energy injection mechanism for the optically-thin stellar wind, and that the entire work done in our hydrodynamic simulation is reversible. McCann et al. (see Footnote 7 and § A.3), for which the velocity pro- file is derived in § A.3. Note that spherical symmetry may not be realistic, even at close distances, but we will make this assumption regardless (Vidotto et al. 2018). Therefore, we use Eq. (A18) with Γ = γ to evaluate the stellar wind's velocity structure. Notice that since u(r) is independent of ρ. Therefore, given a u(cid:63),0 and T(cid:63),0 at r(cid:63),0 (a reference radius not necessarily equal to the stel- lar radius), we can adjust the total pressure of the stellar wind by scaling the stellar proton number density, n(cid:63),0, while leaving all other profiles unaltered P(cid:63),total(r) = ρ(cid:63)u2 (cid:63) + P(cid:63) (cid:32) (cid:32) = n(cid:63),0 (mHII + me) (cid:33) u(cid:63),0 r2 (cid:63),0 u(r) r2 (cid:32) u(r)2 (cid:33)γ(cid:33) + 2kBT(cid:63),0 u(cid:63),0 r2 (cid:63),0 u(r) r2 . (25) Here me is the mass of an electron and mHII is the mass of an ionized hydrogen. Note that there is a factor of two on the thermal pressure to account for both the protons and electrons. Thus, we only need to alter n(cid:63),0 to tune the stellar wind strength. Controlling n(cid:63),0 grants us a handle on where the bow-shock interface of the planetary and stellar winds occurs, and on whether the planetary outflow is a wind or breeze. Moreover, this allows us to use the same velocity and temperature profile, and therefore Mach profile, across all of our stellar winds. We note that realistic stellar winds do not merely differ between one another by a density scaling, and that we are only probing a small area of the possible phase space of stellar winds. In this study we focus on the effects of a confining stellar wind, and therefore only require a handle on the total wind pressure to make compar- isons between wind strengths. Studies probing charge exchange, or stellar magnetic fields, will require more realistic modeling of stellar winds. For a review of real- istic stellar-wind numerical modeling see Gombosi et al. (2018). 2.4. Length scales To determine an appropriately sized domain for any simulation, it is important to understand the length scales of the problem to ensure that everything can be captured within the domain. Additionally, length scales offer insight into the resulting structures and their ori- gins. For our problem, the important scales for the out- flow are: the outflow's scale height (the importance of which has already been discussed in § 2), the optical depth one surface for ionizing photons, the sonic point where the planetary outflow transitions from subsonic to supersonic, the planet's Hill radius, the Coriolis length of the planetary outflow, and the bow shock radius where the planetary and stellar winds collide. Optical depth one to ionizing photons: While τ = 1 along the substellar ray was initially set at Rp, we allow the simulation to self-consistently choose where τ = 1 as the flow evolves. This will depend on the incoming ion- izing flux, recombination rate, and advection of neutrals in the planetary outflow. However, one can still chose np 6 such that τ = 1 ends up near Rp. This choice depends on the strength of the ionizing flux, and is briefly discussed in Appendix C. Sonic point: The sonic point is where the outflow goes transonic ((cid:126)u = cs and (cid:126)u · (cid:126)∇(cid:126)u > 0). However, for a self-consistently launched outflow with ionization heat- ing its location is difficult to know a priori. For ref- erence, the sonic point radius for an isothermal Parker wind is rs,iso = GMp/c2 s . This expression can be used to approximate the location in a self-consistently launched outflow by evaluating cs using the temperature is at the base of the wind, T ∼ 104 K. For a fuller understanding of how the sonic point depends on ionization heating see the discussion in § 2.2.3 of Murray-Clay et al. (2009). Effective Hill radius: The Hill radius, where stellar tidal gravity balances the planet's gravity, is well ap- proximated as (cid:114) Mp 3M(cid:63) rH = a 3 . (26) However, the Hill radius is derived for particles that do not experience a pressure force. Just as the pressure force causes gas in a protoplanetary disk to orbit at sub- Keplerian velocities by effectively reducing the central mass, here the pressure force reduces the Hill radius by effectively reducing the planet's mass. We call this radius where the planet, tidal, and pressure forces balance the "effective Hill radius," which will be interior to Eq. (26) for monotonically decreasing pressure profiles. Coriolis length: Now imagine a ballistic particle only experiencing the Coriolis force, (cid:126)a = −2(cid:126)Ω × (cid:126)v. The par- ticles moves in a circle with a period of t = π/Ω, since the frequency of the acceleration is twice the frame ro- tation, 2Ω, and a full revolution is 2π. Recall that the Coriolis force does no work, serves to transfer momentum between coordinate axes. Therefore, we arbitrarily define when a particle has been significantly affected by the Coriolis force as when its ini- tial momentum has been deflected by one radian, i.e., it has traversed one radius -- the length scale of the circle. Thus the time scale on which particles are significantly affected by the Coriolis force is (2Ω)−1. Given the aver- age velocity over that trajectory, (cid:104)v(cid:105), the Coriolis length scale is (cid:17)· (cid:126)v = 0, and only (cid:16)−2(cid:126)Ω × (cid:126)v LΩ = (cid:104)v(cid:105) 2Ω . (27) One could similarly define the Coriolis length to be the scale on which the outflow reaches a Rossby number of one, Ro ≡ v/(2ΩLΩ). For an outflow with its sonic point interior to the Hill sphere, (cid:104)v(cid:105) is on the order of u∞ from Eq. (19). Bow shock : The bow shock radius, Rbow occurs where there is a pressure match between the stellar wind and the planetary outflow (cid:2)P(cid:63) + ρ(cid:63)u2 (cid:63),⊥ = P + ρu2⊥(cid:3)Rbow. (28) Here the "(cid:63)" subscripts denote the stellar wind, which is not constant throughout the domain. Subscript "⊥" denotes the normal component of the velocity to the bow shock interface. As it is the stellar wind that shrouds the 7 McCann et al. planet, the bow shock is roughly spherical with respect to the planet's origin between the planet and star, but asymptotes to a radial line far past the planet.12 Since we can analytically solve for the stellar wind structure, we can numerically solve for the location of the standoff ra- dius given the numerical structure of the planetary wind in the absence of a stellar wind. We note that because the shocked stellar wind does not radiate effectively, the width of the shocked stellar wind region can be substan- tial, and care must be taken to choose a box size large enough to enclose the shock. 3. NUMERICAL METHODS 3.1. Athena To solve the model described in § 2 we use the publicly available magnetohydrodynamics code Athena v4.2 (Stone et al. 2008). This Eulerian code has been rigorously tested and highly parallelized, making an ideal starting point to solve our radiative-hydrodynamic model. Two additional packages are utilized to add physics beyond the ideal fluid equations. The first is the ionization package from Krumholz et al. (2007), up- dated to incorporate static mesh refinement (SMR) for plane-parallel ionization (Tripathi et al. 2015). The ra- diative transfer in this package is operationally split from the hydrodynamic update and is done by radiative sub- cycling between hydro time steps. Secondly, Athena's shearing-box physics package (Stone et al. 2010) is used to implement the Coriolis force, as described in § 3.1.1. Standard fluid algorithmic choices are as follows. We use the piecewise-parabolic method, a third-order spa- tial reconstruction method, for reconstructing the fluid variables at cell interfaces. For the Riemann problem of the interface fluxes, Roe's linearized solver is used. Our integrator is the 3-D directionally unspilt corner trans- port upwind (CTU) scheme. Static mesh refinement is used around the planet to ensure scale heights within the fluids are well resolved. As discussed in Tripathi et al. (2015), we use the H -- correction algorithm to avoid the carbuncle instability from the wind's convergences on the nightside. 3.1.1. Modifications and use of Athena's features In order to run the simulations successfully and to improve their accuracy, we modify the default Athena code and implement a few non-standard features. First, we added first-order flux correction to the corner trans- port upwind (CTU) integrator, using the same method as already implemented in Athena's van Leer integrator (Beckwith and Stone 2011). This scheme detects when calculation of the flux at higher order leads to a negative density or pressure, and self-consistently redoes the flux calculation at the boundary of each affected cell using more diffusive, and hence more stable, first-order fluxes. Resorting to first-order fluxes turns out to only be nec- essary initially while the wind as launching, for similar reasons as discussed below regarding our prolongation slope limiter changes. Second, we modified Athena's shearing box physics fea- ture so that the Coriolis force without a centrifugal term 12 See Figure 10 of Murray-Clay et al. (2009) for a cartoon of the geometry. can be used with non-periodic boundary conditions. To do so without adding additional fictitious forces one can set the shear parameter to zero, q = −∂log Ω/∂log r = 0. A shear parameter of zero suggests solid body rotation, for which central forces are balanced everywhere and the only force felt is the Coriolis force. Thus the only ficti- tious force the shearing-box module adds is the Corio- lis force, while the tidal forces are taken care of in the static potential without any of the usual shearing-box approximations. Additional steps need to be taken as the shearing-box approximation assumes periodic bound- ary conditions, with Athena's shearing-box feature hard- coded to remap boundaries without consideration to the user-input boundaries. As some simulations are in a rotating frame, issues can arise when a flow is bending near a boundary. To pre- vent unphysical inflow from being extrapolated from the boundary conditions, we use what are sometimes referred to as dipole boundary conditions. That is to say, we use the standard outflow boundary conditions when the bulk velocity normal to the boundary is outwards, but restrict the mass inflow to the initial ambient medium when the normal velocity is inwards. While this sufficiently re- duces undesired inflow, there are still reflections at the boundary that are not damped and can lead to oscilla- tions. While these oscillations are present in our sim- ulations, they occur where the density and pressure are orders of magnitude smaller than those around the planet in the domain of interest. Note that these are not stan- dard Athena boundary conditions, and are implemented as user defined boundary conditions. Next, we also found it necessary to add an additional slope limiter to Athena's prolongation operator as ap- plied at SMR boundaries. Since radiative cooling in our simulations is rapid, when the ionization front in the planetary atmosphere first expands it is characterized by a very large density jump. When this structure passes over SMR boundaries, the prolonged density or pressure can be negative unless it is appropriately limited. We therefore limit the slope in each direction to be less than 4/3,13 which is sufficient to ensure that the prolonged quantities remain positive definite. This limit only mod- ifies the simulation during the early phase of evolution when the outflow is expanding, and does not apply in the steady-state configuration reached at later times as this structure has passed over all of our SMR level bound- aries. Finally, we made minor improvements to Krumholz et al.'s (2007) ionization package by modifying the temper- ature calculation to produce higher accuracy. Our mod- ified version of Athena, other tools used in the produc- tion of this paper, a version of this paper with embedded movies, and more are freely available for download and use at our GitLab repository.14 3.2. Domain setup 3.2.1. Reference frame All simulations have the planet at the origin, and de- pending on the simulation, we adopt either an inertial or 13 This limit comes from the cell-centered distances between child cells and their parents, 1/4, and the number of dimensions, 3. 14 https://gitlab.com/athena ae/athena ae 8 McCann et al. a non-inertial rotating reference frame. By using a frame centered on the secondary we can use a smaller domain, which keeps both total computational expense and error from using plane-parallel radiation to a minimum. For rotating frames, let the primary be located at (cid:126)r(cid:63) = −a x and the barycenter at (cid:126)rb = −aM(cid:63)/(M(cid:63) + Mp) x, so that the potential in Eq. (21) is recast as φ((cid:126)r) = − GMp (cid:126)r − GM(cid:63) (cid:126)r − (cid:126)r(cid:63) − 1 2 Ω2(cid:126)r⊥ − (cid:126)rb2. (29) The first term is included in all of our simulations as the planet is always present, while the second and third term are only included in simulations where tidal po- tential is considered. In Athena this is implemented by setting the static potential function to Eq. (29). This allows us to examine the tidal forces aspect of a rotating frame without considering the Coriolis force, which can be included with the shearing-box package described in § 3.1.1. 3.2.2. Fluid initial conditions Within the simulation is a planetary atmosphere sur- rounded by an ambient medium. The parameters that characterize the planet and its atmosphere are the planet's mass, Mp, and radius, Rp, and the temperature, Tp, at Rp. While the mass and radius can be treated as free parameters used to model any desired planet, to launch a wind from ionization heating the planet's temperature must be well below that of the launched wind (Appendix A of Murray-Clay et al. 2009). Thus the temperature sets a physical scale within the prob- lem (Tp (cid:28) 104 K for hot Jupiters), making planets with larger escape speeds or smaller wind temperatures, which have a smaller scale height to planetary radius ratio, more challenging to simulate. Other atmospheric quantities can be calculated from these primary parameters and certain assumptions. One such assumption -- accurate for ionizing fluxes studied here -- is that planetary escape occurs in the energy- limited regime rather than the recombination-limited regime, as described in Murray-Clay et al. (2009). Therefore, the surface of optical depth unity to ionizing photons does not move appreciably between the start of the simulation and when the wind has reached steady state. As the initial isentropic atmosphere's density and pressure scale heights are independent of the particle number density, we can always set the location of the optical depth unity surface to be at Rp by scaling the number density. We do so by setting np = where (cid:101)H is a scale height defined in Appendix C. Oth- erwise, in the recombination-limited regime one could balance recombination with ionization, to get a proper number density such that detailed balance is achieved near Rp. Setting aside the temperature, a planet's mass and ra- dius will determine the scale height and in turn the simu- lation resolution required. For an isentropic atmosphere, the scale heights become infinitesimally small near the σHI(cid:101)H(Rp) 1 , (30) edge of the atmosphere and at the core. This does not matter near the atmospheric edge as we truncate before reaching the zero radius, and once the simulation begins to run the edge will be replaced by a wind in any event. However, the singularity near the core requires that we adopt an inner boundary in our simulation to avoid nu- merical difficulties. To set the inner boundary, Rib, we require a few scale heights between τ = 1 and Rib, so that the base of the wind will be self-consistently found without interference from the inner boundary. Here we define a scale height to be one e -- folding in density (see Eq. (C1)), and choose Rib to be two scale heights below the initial atmosphere's τ = 1. We then set Rmask five cells below Rib (number of ghost cells plus one), within which we hold the all variables to the same fixed value. By resetting all the cells between Rib and Rmask at every time step to their hydrostatic solution, we create an internal boundary con- dition, as no information within Rmask can propagate out by construction. By using a masking radius instead of a softening radius (i.e., a Plummer radius) in our potential we avoiding introducing artificial errors in our potential. Past the numerical edge of the planetary atmosphere is the ambient medium. When the ambient medium is not supposed to represent a stellar wind, our goal is to minimize its impact on the planetary wind. The de- tailed structure of our ambient medium is described in Appendix B, but it suffices to say that by using a low density, initially pressure-matched, ambient medium, we prevent infall onto the atmosphere and stop the plane- tary wind from entering a snowplow phase. When we do include a stellar wind, we initialize the ambient medium with the velocity structure given by Eq. (A18). With the velocity structure and a stellar mass-loss rate we can then calculate the density and temperature profiles of the wind with Eqs. (A16) and (A17) respectively. To indef- initely sustain the wind, the same formulation used to refresh the planet's hydrostatic lower atmosphere with a fixed inner boundary is used. That means within a fixed inner boundary radius, r(cid:63),ib = 4 × 1011 cm, centered on the star's origin, stellar wind conditions are held constant throughout time. Lastly, the domain's dipole boundary conditions (§ 3.1.1) are then modified to respect these conditions. As mentioned in §2.3.4, the stellar wind is either always sonic or sub-sonic due to the stellar wind's polytropic in- dex of Γ = 5/3. Therefore, we chose a sonic stellar wind, such that it will shock on the planetary outflow. While the wind is technically isentropic, it has been carefully chosen to mimic a more realistic stellar wind within the domain of the simulation. Specifically, the stellar wind starts at r(cid:63),0 with v = 200 km s−1, but by the time it reaches the planet it has accelerated to v = 290 km s−1 (similar stellar outflow velocities are found, e.g., in a stel- lar wind model for HD 219134 by Vidotto et al. (2018)). It continues to accelerate past the planet with a maxi- mum of nearly 300 km s−1. We note that outside of our simulation box, the isentropic stellar wind is not a good model for the stellar wind profiles. 3.2.3. Stellar radiation A planetary wind is launched by irradiating our com- putational domain with monochromatic plane-parallel radiation. Ionizing flux enters from the negative x -- axis, 9 Table 1 Simulation parameters Parameter Planet Mass, Mp (g) Radius, Rp (cm) Temperature at Rp, Tp (K) Density at Rp,# ρp (g cm−3) Orbital Parmeters Semi-major axis, a (cm) Orbital period,# P (s) Star Mass, M(cid:63) (g) Radius, R(cid:63) (cm) Ionizing flux, F0 (cm−2 s−1) Photon energy, hν (eV) McCann et al. Value 5.0×1029 1.5×1010 1.1×103 6.64×10−16 1.0×1012 5.5×105 1.989×1033 6.957×1010 2.0×1013 1.6×101 Stellar wind 4.0×1011 Reference radius, r(cid:63),0 (cm) 1.35×106 Temperature at r(cid:63),0, T(cid:63),0 (K) 2.0×107 Velocity at r(cid:63),0, v(cid:63),0 (cm s−1) Proton number density at r(cid:63),0, n(cid:63),0 (cm−3) (1.5, 15, 70)×103 (1.3, 13, 59)×10−16 M(cid:63) (M(cid:12) yr−1) Mass-loss rate,# (1.3, 13, 61)×10−7 Pressure at planet,# P(cid:63),total(a) (dyn cm−2) Note. -- Parameters used in simulations. Parameters that are not free parameters, but are determined by other variables are de- noted with a # superscript. Tuple values in parentheses correspond to the weak, intermediate, and strong stellar winds accordingly. altering the ionization state and depositing energy into the fluid. To prevent transients from impacting the early simulation, the flux is ramped up so that the wind is gently launched into the ambient medium. Let the true physical stellar flux be equal to our flux at time equal infinity, F (∞) = F∞. Our initial flux will start at a factor f0 of the physical flux, such that F (0) = f0F∞. We gradually increase the flux using a Gaussian rate of change ramp function with standard deviation σ, so that after time t the flux is (cid:18) (cid:18) (cid:18) t t1/2 (cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19) . − 1 F (t) = F∞ 2 1 + erf erf −1 (1 − 2f0) (31) Here erf() is the error function and erf−1() is the inverse error function. The halfway point of the flux ramping −1 (1 − 2f0), such that F (t1/2) = occurs at t1/2 = 2 F (∞). In practice, once F (t) = 0.999F∞ we set F (t) = 1 F∞ for the rest of the simulation duration. 2σ erf √ 3.3. Parameters used To efficiently model atmospheric escape around hot Jupiters, we pick parameters that enable good resolu- tion at reasonable cost while still being physically moti- vated. For the planet we use Mp = 5.0 × 1029 g ≈ M(cid:89), Rp = 1.5 × 1010 cm ≈ 2R(cid:88), and Tp = 1100 K with a semi-major axis a = 1012 cm ≈ 0.07 au. Recall that (cid:89) is the astronomical symbol for Saturn and (cid:88) the symbol for Jupiter. Our choices correspond to a large planetary radius, which helps increase the scale height by decreas- ing the local surface gravity g. For a full understanding of how these parameters affect the scale height, see Ap- pendix C. Our parameters are close to those of Wasp-17 b, one of the more extreme exoplanets. We run all of our simulations for 2 × 106 s, which is over 3.5 orbital peri- ods. After which, all simulations appear to have reached a steady or quasi-steady state. The domain varies depending on which simulation we run. As explained in § 4, we run three classes of simula- tion depending on which physical processes we include; we denote these runs Rogue, Tidal, and Rotating. Our Rogue simulations are carried out in a (50Rp)3 box cen- tered on the planet. The Tidal simulations use a similar domain, but extended an additional 25Rp along the neg- ative x -- axis towards the star ((75 × 50 × 50)Rp). Lastly the Rotating simulations take the Tidal domain and ex- tend an additional 25Rp along both the negative and positive y -- axes ((75× 100× 50)Rp). For the planet's in- ner boundary conditions, we use Rmask = 44/64Rp and Rib = 49/64Rp. The edge of the planetary atmosphere √ is at Re,0 = 89/80Rp, and the first ambient medium's edge is at Re,1 = 2 3Rp (defined in Appendix B). Computational expense varies greatly across our sev- eral different simulations. We used 115 Intel Xeon E5- 2650 CPUs in parallel for all simulations. Wall times ranged from roughly 2 days (Rogue) to a month (Rotat- ing with a strong stellar wind). However, most simula- tions ran in under 10 days, with the strong stellar wind being the outlier (for the Rotating domain, the interme- diate stellar wind took 13.5 days and the weak stellar wind took 10 days). The two main reasons for the range of cost were the varying domain sizes, and the inclusion of a stellar wind. The most prohibiting factor, a strong- stellar-wind, remains present on the finest level of reso- lution throughout the duration of the simulation. As the stellar wind is both hot and fast, the Courant condition leads to smaller time-steps for the stellar wind than the planetary outflow at the same spatial resolution. Ideally in the future, adaptive mesh refinement or better static mesh refinement will be chosen to avoid excessively high spatial resolution in the stellar wind. Resolution for the simulation is set such that within a cell there is at most a scale height. While we do not know the structure of the wind in steady state a pri- ori, the hydrostatic isentropic atmosphere contains some of the smallest scale heights throughout the duration of the simulation. The number of scale heights between two points in our hydrostatic isentropic atmosphere is given by Eq. (C2). Since the hydrostatic atmosphere and base of the wind require the most resolution, we use a statically-refined mesh. The highest resolution region, which is a box of size (2.5Rp)3 centered on the planet with δx = Rp/64, encapsulates both the wind base and hydrostatic atmosphere. We then include four coarser levels of refinement around that, leading to a minimum resolution δx = Rp/4 in the region outside a box of size (4Rp)3 centered on the planet. The star is modeled after the Sun, with M(cid:63) = 1.989 × 1033 g = M(cid:12) and R(cid:63) = 6.957 × 1010 cm = R(cid:12). The ionizing flux is F∞ = 2 × 1013 cm−2 s−1, which is comparable to our sun's "moderate to low solar activ- ity" extreme-ultraviolet flux15 scaled to 0.05 au (Woods 15 Photon energies of 13.6 eV to 40 eV (91 nm to 30 nm). 10 McCann et al. et al. 1998). Note our ionizing flux is scaled to the cen- ter of our box as we use plane-parallel radiation. To ramp the flux to avoid transients we use f0 = 10−2, and t1/2 = 5 × 104 s. We use a monochromatic ionizing flux of hν = 16 eV, which is in line with previous studies and reasonable for a hot Jupiter around a quiet solar analog (Tripathi et al. 2015). For simulations that include a stellar wind, we con- sider a range of wind strengths, as parameterized by n(cid:63),0, Eq. (25). Our choices for n(cid:63),0 are 1.5 × 103 cm−3, 1.5 × 104 cm−3 and 7.0 × 104 cm−3 at reference radius r(cid:63),0 = 4 × 1011 cm ≈ 0.03 au. Note that the proton num- ber density of the Sun's stellar wind at this distance is roughly n(cid:63),0 = 8.4 × 103 cm−3, which falls directly be- tween our low and intermediate value. Vidotto & Bour- rier's (2017) model of GJ 436 estimate a ram pressure of Pram = 1.4 × 106 dyn cm−2 at the location of GJ 436 b, which nearly corresponds to the pressure of our inter- mediate stellar wind. Vidotto et al. (2018) modeled HD 219134, and found pressures near HD 219314 b similar to our strong stellar wind. The other parameters of the stellar wind are T(cid:63) = 1.35 × 106 K and an initial veloc- ity of v(cid:63) = 200 km s−1, corresponding to a Mach number of M = 1.04. The stellar mass-loss rates correspond- ing to our three wind strengths are 1.3 × 10−16 M(cid:12) yr−1, 1.3 × 10−15 M(cid:12) yr−1 and 5.9 × 10−15 M(cid:12) yr−1. 4. RESULTS We now explore the effects of the tidal gravity, the Coriolis force, and the stellar wind on the planetary out- flow piece-by-piece. Our base case is an atmosphere re- ceiving ionizing flux in the planet's potential with no external stellar wind (Rogue run, § 4.1). The impact of non-inertial forces from the planet's orbit around a star is first examined without the Coriolis force (Tidal run, § 4.2) then with (Rotating run, § 4.3). The morphology of the outflows until this point is recapped with a more quantitative analysis of their velocity structures in § 4.4. Next the effects of a stellar wind are demonstrated by contrasting the results of varying stellar wind strengths in both the Rogue and Tidal runs (§ 4.5). Finally the full suite of stellar environment physics is considered in the Rotating run with a stellar wind (§ 4.6). A sum- mary of quantitative variables, particularly the mass-loss rate, across all simulations is given in § 4.7, and obser- vational consequences are delayed until § 5. Summarized in Table 1 are the important simulation parameters used across all runs. 4.1. Rogue simulation: effects of ionizing radiation We begin with a planet receiving plane-parallel ioniz- ing radiation in the absence of tidal gravity or a stellar wind, shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(d). The closest phys- ical analog would be an ejected rogue planet heated by high-energy photons from a nearby high-mass star. Such a situation would be more likely to occur in extreme en- vironments, for example the young star-forming regions near the Galactic Center. However, the motivation for this study is as a base case for comparison to more com- plex planetary conditions, i.e., those with a stellar host. Despite inherent asymmetric heating, the outflow at large scales is strikingly spherically symmetric. The sym- metry arises from azimuthal pressure gradients freely re- McCann et al. Figure 2. The fully-launched density structure of a hydrodynamic escaping planetary outflow without a stellar wind. Ionizing radiation enters from the left side of each box. The first row shows slices in the orbital plane, z = 0, while the second row shows vertical slices perpendicular to the planet-star axis, y = 0. Left: Our Rogue planet, which only feel the effects of an external ionizing source and the planet's gravity. Middle: Our Tidal simulation, which includes tidal gravity but no Coriolis term. Right: A true rotating frame with the Coriolis force, called our Rotating simulation. This figure is available online as an animation, showing the launching of the outflow from t = 0 s until t = 2 × 106 s. distributing material along equipotential surfaces, the ef- ficiency of which can be seen in the steady-state solution of the temperature distribution, Figure 3. At larger dis- tances material streams radially outwards, having sub- dued the azimuthal pressure gradients. It is only on the nightside, originating from the planet's shadow, that a planetary tail and the surrounding dearth of material break the symmetry. Note that the "planetary tail" is not the nightside or downstream arm of the outflow, but the noticeably neutral-enriched density enhancement that forms in the shadow of the planet. advects heat to the nightside, it cannot remain cold as it does in the fixed anisotropic Parker wind. Setting boundary conditions interior to the wind base enables the nightside to readjust, preventing material from reentering the atmosphere. Material advected to the nightside, unable to receive ionizing radiation in the planet's shadow, begins to form the planetary tail. The tail then serves to lessen azimuthal pressure gradients and shuts down the compression shock, explaining why we only see the shock as an initial transient in our sim- ulations. Even with typical ISM cooling rates at solar metallicity, we find that the timescale for the material to flow from the day to nightside would be too fast for the tail to sufficiently cool and collapse. We note that both the previous models and ours lack consideration of conductive heating and cooling. While conduction was found not to be dynamically important on the substel- lar ray due to outflow timescales (Garc`ıa Munoz 2007; Murray-Clay et al. 2009), if hot stagnant gas persists on the nightside, evident in Figure 3, heat conduction may be dynamically important -- something future multi- dimensional simulations need to take into consideration. The formation of the tail is also responsible for the sur- rounding dearth of material. The tail grows by accruing material via the tip, thus new material must travel far- ther, spending more time in ionizing radiation, before it can enter the shadow. Eventually there comes a point at which this material has received enough ionizing energy The planetary tail is a new prediction in multi- dimensional simulations (also seen in Debrecht et al. in press), as previous models had not resolved the stellar heating. Instead these models used an adiabatic index near one, and fixed temperature boundary conditions that varied as the angular distance from the substellar point, to emulate an anisotropic, isothermal Parker wind (Stone and Proga 2009; Carroll-Nellenback et al. 2017). In place of a planetary tail, these prior studies show a sustained nightside compression shock, which arises as hot dayside material flows around the planet and enters the planet's cold nightside atmosphere (See Figures 1 and 4 in Stone and Proga 2009; Figure 3 "ANISO" panel in Carroll-Nellenback et al. 2017). We should note that this phenomenon is also seen in our simulations, but only ini- tially as our boundary conditions are set deeper than the base of the wind. Thus, when inflowing dayside material 11 20020y (Rp)RogueTidalRotating20020x (Rp)20020z (Rp)20020x (Rp)20020x (Rp)10201019101810171016Density (g/cm3)McCann et al. Figure 4. Panel (a): Streamlines (chartreuse yellow) overlaid on gas density from the steady-state Tidal run (Figure 2(b)). The sonic surface is demarcated in red, with the outer sonic surface coinciding with the interface between the planetary outflow and the virtually static ambient medium. Note that while supersonic material does shock within the flow, the shock is oblique and thus there is no corresponding sonic surface. Panel (b): Ballistic tra- jectories (white) of particles launched radially from the surface of the planet with velocity vp (see text). Ballistic particles launched near the planet's terminator (x = 0, y = ±Rp) achieve the furthest y -- extent for gas infalling onto the star. These trajectories bound the rest of the flow and are in good agreement with the outer sonic surface that demarcates the interface with the ambient medium. Notice no significant trajectory crossing seems to occur in the or- bital plane. Shocking results instead from trajectories crossing the orbital plane from above and below, having been accelerated to do so by stellar gravity -- white dots demarcate where a few such trajectories, i.e., those originating with z (cid:54)= 0, pass through the orbital plane. Trajectories launched near the poles (z = ±Rp) are excluded, as they shock gas far out of the orbital plane. ample flux to achieve such temperatures. We therefore suggest a cosine anisotropic heating function would only be suitable for planets whose dayside temperature is set by the heating rate and not the cooling rate, such as a planet similar to Earth. 4.2. Tidal simulation: effects of tidal gravity and ionizing radiation Our Tidal run is shown in Figures 2(b) and 2(e). In addition to ionizing radiation, it includes tidal forces, with the star located at x = −66.¯6Rp. Note that this is not a true rotating frame as we neglect the Coriolis force, but this frame is akin to that used in Tripathi et al. (2015) and numerous 1-D models that included tidal gravity. Figure 3. The temperature of the gas for our Rogue planet. The green contour is the surface where τ = 1 for ionizing radiation entering from the left side of the plot. The corresponding dashed green circle is of constant radius equal to the substellar τ = 1 radius. While the nightside is cold just at and below the dashed circle, the temperature just above is practically uniform around the entire planet. The pencil shadings are the line integral convolution to assist in visualizing the flow. We can see a stagnation point in the shadow near 4Rp, which leads to the flaring around the neutral shadow exhibited in Figures 2(a) and 2(d). The sonic surface is marked in red and does not form a closed surface. to become unbound, and it flows radially outwards as this is now the path of least resistance. Thus, drawing a radial line from the origin to this point at the edge of the shadow demarcates the dearth boundary. With this de- scription the length, (cid:96), from the planet where the flaring outflow begins to diverge from the tail can be estimated. We equate the potential energy to the ionizing heating rate multiplied by the time spent getting there, i.e., the distance divided by the flow velocity, φ = G (cid:96)/v. For a point-mass potential this yields (cid:115) (cid:96) = GMp µv Epe σHI F∞ e−τ . (32) With a flow velocity of order v = 10 km s−1, and marginally bound gas near the τ = 1 surface, we find (cid:96) = 3.6Rp -- close to the simulation's 4Rp. Naively one might expect the tail to truncate at this distance as it can no longer receive material at the tip. However, the tail is hot and adiabatically expands outwards, allowing new material to enter at points prior to the truncation, sustaining its growth. Lastly, we comment that irrespective of the night- side steady state, a cosine temperature function does not match the dayside temperature profile of the self- consistently simulated hot Jupiter. At the altitude of the wind base, the temperature is uniformly ∼7000 K, shown in Figure 3. This directly calls into question whether simple cosine anisotropic heating functions are valid in the regime of hot Jupiters. We believe not, as the co- sine function inherently assumes the temperature is set by the flux received. Instead, we find that for the day- side of hot Jupiters the temperature is set by the cooling equilibrium temperature, as the entire face is bathed in 12 42024x (Rp)42024y (Rp)103104Temperature (K)McCann et al. gravity. Trajectories originating both above and below the orbital plane oscillate through the orbital plane, in- tersecting many trajectories closer to the orbital plane which were not as strongly accelerated into the plane. Notice that with tidal gravity the dearth of material around the tail appears less pronounced in the orbital plane and nonexistent in the x -- z plane. The nonexis- tence in the x -- z plane is due to the star's strong grav- itational pull of all the gas back into the orbital plane. Eventually far away from the planet, the entire night- side stream will be compressed into a vertically pressure- supported plane due to the star's gravity. In the orbital plane the reduced flaring can be understood from the tidal forces stretching the outflow along the x -- axis, i.e., material unbound from the planet no longer moves purely radially. Unlike in the vertical plane, the dearth is not readily filled by the stellar gravitational pull towards the x -- axis, as the centrifugal force opposes the pull with a push. 4.3. Rotating simulation: effects of tidal gravity and ionizing radiation in a rotating frame The Rotating run is presented in Figures 2(c) and 2(f), where we have now included the Coriolis force in addi- tion to the tidal forces. A Rotating frame without a stellar wind has also been explored with a separate code, AstroBEAR, finding qualitatively the same geometry and quantitatively the same mass-loss rates (Debrecht et al. in press). Due to the Coriolis force, streamlines now wind in a clockwise fashion as our rotation vector points out of the page (Figure 5(a)). We can still understand the day- side and nightside arm dichotomy as owing to the tidal focusing previously described, but now deflected with the inclusion of the Coriolis force. Including the Coriolis force in our ballistic trajectory analysis demonstrates that there now exist significant trajectory intersections, even in the orbital plane (Figure 5(b)). In Figure 5(b) the white dots along the ballistic trajectories denote where the velocity of each stream- line has been deflected by one radian, which defines our Coriolis length scale. The surface created by these dots is similar to the teardrop-shaped shock, evident in the density map of Figure 2(c), with an additional rotation of roughly π/12. This additional rotation may arise be- cause the shocked gas moves slower than the unshocked gas and therefore turns on a smaller scale. Material the outflow shocks on has rotated more than predicted from the ballistic analysis, modestly rotating the shock inter- face everywhere. Note that the Coriolis length is not spherically sym- metric for two reasons. First, the velocity profiles along each streamline may not be equal, owing to the day- side/nightside asymmetric heating. This effect seems small as our ballistic particles are all launched at the same velocity from Rp and seem to give good agreement with the simulation. However, a detailed examination of the ballistic trajectories shows that the distance of the nightside shock from the planet is not as well matched as that on the dayside suggesting that the nightside would be better described by modestly lower ballistic velocities. The second and more significant asymmetry is due to the fact that particles launched from the planet in quadrant I (upper right) and III (lower left) are pulled by tidal forces in in the same direction that the Coriolis force 13 launched with initial velocity vp =(cid:112)v2 Figure 5. Gas streamlines and ballistic particles launched from the planet surface overlain on the steady-state density map from our Rotating simulation (Figure 2(c)). The ballistic trajectories are esc + v2∞ at Rp, which gives the particles a total energy equal to that of the gas at infinity for the Rogue case. Given this energy, the ballistic trajectories show the farthest possible extent of the gas. The white dots along the ballistic trajectories occur where the velocities have been deflected by one radian from their original direction. This is what we call our Coriolis length, which roughly matches the shock we see in the simulation. A clear difference between the Tidal and Rogue runs is the funneling of material towards the star. Escaping planetary gas is energetically restricted to a cone origi- nating at the barycenter by the star's gravitational pull and the frame's centrifugal push (Figure 4). This can be further illuminated by considering ballistic particles. Figure 4(b) illustrates the ballistic trajectories of parti- cles launched radially from the planet's surface at veloc- ity vp. For supersonic flow (external to the inner red contour in Figure 4(a)) the internal energy of the fluid is much less than the kinetic energy, and rough agreement between the streamlines and ballistic trajectories is ex- pected. Given that the outflow quickly becomes super- sonic, large-scale streamlines should match appropriately chosen ballistic trajectories. These trajectories are cho- sen such that the total energy at infinity, ignoring work done by tidal forces, is the same found in the Rogue runs, e∞ = v2∞/2, so that vp =(cid:112)v2 esc + v2∞. Along with the funneling comes a shock in the outflow with the same funnel geometry. Examination of ballis- tic particles in the orbital plane gives little hint of in- tersecting trajectories (Figure 4(b)). However, due to the lack of the centrifugal force in the z -- axis, intersec- tions still readily occur. This can be seen by considering ballistic particles launched with the majority of their ve- locity parallel to the z -- axis (not shown). Trajectories able to escape the planet's gravitational pull neverthe- less fall back into the orbital plane due to the stellar McCann et al. 4.4. Comparison of velocity structures Figure 6 provides the x -- component (black) and the y -- component (blue) of the velocity profiles for the Rogue (dotted), Tidal (dashed) and Rotating (solid) runs along the x -- axis.17 The Rogue planet has a velocity x -- component that asymptotes to a finite value on the dayside as expected from Eq. (19). On the nightside, the column is roughly hydrostatic.18 For the Tidal run, the velocity starts to significantly deviate from the Rogue case outside the Hill radius (blue vertical). There is also a hydrostatic tail on the nightside out to about 2Rp, af- ter which tidal forces start significantly accelerating the gas. Recall that the effective Hill sphere for the gas is less than the Hill sphere in Eq. (26) due to gas pressure forces (§ 2.4), so that the effective Hill radius appears to be near 2Rp. This is almost equivalent to reducing the planet's mass in Eq. (26) to Mp/3. In a true rotating frame with the Coriolis force, stream- lines are no longer radial and velocities along the x -- axis no longer probe a single streamline. Looking at the dayside, we can see the x -- component of velocity is less than that of the Tidal run, as some of the velocity has been transferred into the y -- component. Note that even though the Coriolis force does no work, the velocity com- ponents will not add in quadrature to be equivalent to the Tidal run, as the same x -- coordinate corresponds to different distances from the planet along a streamline in the two runs. This explains why the nightside velocity is greater in the Rotating case than in the Tidal case, as the streamlines sampled here are originating closer to the dayside and have had more time to accelerate. Note that eventually both on the dayside and nightside there is a shock even in the absence of a stellar wind. This oc- curs near the Coriolis length scale where streamlines have been significantly bent, and trajectories start to cross. On the nightside the shock is at smaller distances for reasons discussed in § 4.3. 4.5. Stellar wind in Rogue and Tidal runs: effects of a stellar wind and ionizing radiation In this section we add a stellar wind to both the Rogue and Tidal simulations. We study three different stellar wind strengths tuned by the stellar wind proton number density, n(cid:63),0: a weak (n(cid:63),0 = 1.5 × 103 cm−3), an in- termediate (n(cid:63),0 = 1.5 × 104 cm−3), and a strong stellar wind (n(cid:63),0 = 7.0 × 104 cm−3). Qualitatively, what sepa- rates the strong from the weak stellar wind is whether the planetary outflow solution is a wind or a breeze. The in- termediate stellar wind is in between these two extremes, but is chosen to still be a wind but with a smaller bow shock radius. Shown in the top row of Figure 7 is the x -- y orbital plane slice of density in simulations without tidal forces, i.e., Rogue runs with stellar wind. The second row has tidal forces, i.e., Tidal runs with a stellar wind. The first column is our weak stellar wind, the second our intermediate and last our strong stellar wind. The weak stellar wind (Figures 7(a) and 7(d)), is able 17 Along this cut, the x -- axis, the Cartesian variables directly correspond to the polar variables: vx = vr and vy = vφ. 18 There is actually some infall coming from circulation in the shadow as material falls inwards along the x -- axis and moves out- wards near the edge of the shadow. See the line integral convolution shading in Figure 3. Figure 6. Velocity along the x -- axis for three simulations: Rogue (dotted), Tidal (dashed) and Rotating (solid). The black lines are the x velocity and the blue lines are the y velocity. In both the Tidal and Rotating runs there is significant acceleration outside the Hill radius from tidal forces. On the nightside the gas remains stagnant out to about 2Rp,where tidal forces begin to accelerate it away from the planet. The decrease in velocity in the Rotating profiles at large separation is from a shock, which occurs near the Coriolis length on the dayside, and slightly closer to the planet on the nightside due to slower outflow velocities. The velocity on the nightside is faster in the Rotating case compared to the Tidal case because the x -- axis samples multiple streamlines in the Rotating case. The verticals lines are clearly labeled, and overlap (or do not exist for some simulations, i.e., the Coriolis length), except for the sonic point. That is because due to tidal forces, Tidal and Rotating (overlapping sonic points) go transonic before the Rogue simulation. The shaded regions denote regions that are fixed by boundary conditions (light grey for Rib and dark grey for Rmask), and should be ignored. bends them, towards the x -- axis (y = 0) and away from the y -- axis (x = 0). Conversely, quadrants II (upper left) and IV (lower right) are pulled in the opposite direction of their deflections. Thus, in a rotating frame tidal forces can either assist or hinder the turning of streamlines, and the shock occurs closer to the planet in quadrants I and III than in II and IV. In Figure 5 the ballistic trajectories completely bound the extent of the atmospheric escape. This is a statement about which regions of space are energetically forbidden for the escaping gas to reach. While the trajectories do a good job in all four quadrants of probing the maximal extent of the outflow, they dramatically overestimate the extent of the outflow in quadrant IV. This is due to the fact that the farthest reach of the flow to positive x val- ues in quadrant IV comes from gas that originated or passed through the shadow of the planet -- readily seen by following the nightside tail in Figure 2(c). Unable to receive ionization heating in the shadow, the gas is not fully accelerated, turns on smaller lengths, and thus reaches a lesser extent in quadrant IV than predicted by ballistics. The planetary tail remains present, but is now bent due to the Coriolis force. Its turning length appears longer than the other streamlines due to the column being virtu- ally stagnant until the gas' effective Hill radius.16 Thus the tail follows ballistic particles launched from the ef- fective Hill sphere near 2Rp on the nightside, giving the appearance of a longer turning length. 16 The effective Hill radius being smaller than the standard bal- listic Hill radius, see § 2.4 14 -7.0-5.0-3.0-1.01.03.05.07.0x (Rp)40302010010203040Velocityx(km/s)40302010010203040Velocityy(km/s)40302010010203040Velocityy(km/s)40302010010203040Velocityy(km/s)RogueTidalRotatingSonic PointUV Depth OneHill RadiusCoriolisCoriolisHill RadiusMcCann et al. Figure 7. Snapshots of the density structure of a fully launched hydrodynamic escaping planetary wind outflow with varying stellar wind strengths in the orbital plane, z = 0. The first row shows our Rogue simulations and the second row is our Tidal runs. The columns are for the various wind strengths parameterized by: n(cid:63),0 = 1.5 × 103 cm−3 (left), n(cid:63),0 = 1.5 × 104 cm−3 (middle), and n(cid:63),0 = 7.0 × 104 cm−3 (right). Panel (a) shows planetary gas forming a bow shock with the stellar wind. Panel (d) is unconfined as the stellar wind is not strong enough to overcome the planetary outflow, and panel (e) is not in a steady state. The rest show complete confinement and breezes. to confine the planetary wind when tidal forces are ab- sent. In contrast when tidal gravity is included, the plan- etary wind is no longer confined and is able to exit our domain. The intermediate stellar wind (Figures 7(b) and 7(e)) is capable of confining the planetary wind for the most part. Without tidal forces it is actually confined so strongly that the planetary outflow is no longer a wind, but a breeze as seen by the absence of shocked planetary gas. With tidal forces the outflow is still capable of be- ing a wind. However, we have provided a snapshot that hints that the stellar confinement is not complete. This is not due to picking a frame prior to steady state, but as we shall see is due to no steady state standoff shock being possible. Lastly our strong stellar wind (Figures 7(c) and 7(f)) is capable of confining both the Rogue and Tidal simulations to breezes. Note that the Tidal simu- lation is more confined, as within roughly 10Rp on the nightside, the tidal forces are restorative to the x -- axis (y = 0). To explore the absence of a steady state in the inter- mediate Tidal run we present a time series of simulation snapshots in Figure 8. In Figure 8(a) the planetary wind is reasonably well confined by the stellar wind. However the confined region grows as the planetary wind contin- ues to liberate more mass towards the star. Eventually in Figure 8(b) the dayside outflow grows too close to the star, where the stellar wind grows stronger, and is pushed back. Finding the path of least resistance the overex- tended gas is blown out and around the core-confined planetary wind (Figure 8(c)), reducing the planetary wind to a state similar to earlier, as seen in Figure 8(d). Note that the time between Figure 8(a) and Figure 8(d) is 2.7 × 105 s. This process repeats itself in perpetuity at roughly this timescale. A movie of several cycles is avail- able online. Since this is not a truly physical frame, we leave a detailed explanation until § 4.6 -- where a similar behavior is seen. To understand the differences between a breeze and a wind, we present a density comparison of the substel- lar ray for three stellar wind strengths from our Rogue run in Figure 9. Relative to when there is no stellar wind (dotted line), the weak stellar wind (dashed line) agrees well within ∼6 Rp, i.e., prior to the planetary gas being shocked. The thickness of the planetary shock is ∼3 Rp, extending to the contact discontinuity between the stellar and planetary winds at ∼9 Rp. By compar- ison the intermediate stellar wind case (solid line) has no shocked planetary wind, and the entire outflow is in causal contact with the stellar wind as the outflow never goes transonic and is a breeze. The zoomed insert demonstrates that interior to the sonic point, the weak- stellar-wind case is in excellent agreement with the no- stellar-wind case, whereas the intermediate stellar wind causes a planetary breeze that significantly diverges from the base case. Taken in conjunction with the fact that no information propagates upstream in a sonic flow, the 15 20020y (Rp)RogueWeakIntermediateStrong20020x (Rp)20020y (Rp)Tidal20020x (Rp)20020x (Rp)10201019101810171016Density (g/cm3)McCann et al. Finally, we add our three stellar winds into our Ro- tating simulation, shown in Figure 10. The top row are the x -- y orbital plane and the second rows the x -- z plane density slices. The columns are from left to right: a weak, intermediate and strong stellar wind. Similar to the Tidal simulations with a stellar wind, the three wind strengths exhibit three different regimes. The weak stel- lar wind (Figures 10(a) and 10(d)), is incapable of con- fining the planetary outflow within our domain. For the intermediate wind, we see a snapshot of the partially- confined planetary wind, which as in the Tidal simula- tion (§4.5), undergoes periodic disruption events. Lastly, the strong stellar wind is capable of completely confin- ing the planetary outflow and reducing it to a breeze. Zoomed-in plots of the velocity magnitude, temperature, neutral number density and neutral fraction for each sim- ulation are shown in Figure 11. The columns from left to right again correspond to weak, intermediate and strong stellar winds. The intermediate wind cannot achieve a steady-state standoff shock. The time series for the Rotating run with this behavior is displayed in Figure 12. Arranged from Figures 12(a) to 12(d) in chronological order, are snap- shots of the x -- y orbital plane gas density. Initially the planetary outflow is confined, but continues to grow as more gas is liberated from the planet. Eventually the arm grows too large and is blown out, resetting the con- fined planetary wind to something similar to an earlier state, after which the process repeats. To understand the timescale of the disruption event consider the following. The geometry of the outflow forms a torus around the star. such that the dayside arm is collimated into a cylinder, length L and cross- sectional radius s. The mass enclosed in the cylinder grows proportional to M (t) ∝ M t/2, where the factor of one-half accounts for the two arms of the outflow. Let the length of the cylinder grow at some average velocity (cid:104)u(cid:105), i.e., L(t) ∝ (cid:104)u(cid:105)t. Then a cylinder that has just been disrupted starts to grow according to, L(t) = (cid:104)u(cid:105)t and M (t) = M t/2. We imagine that the inflow "nozzle" growing the cylin- der from the planetary outflow is sufficiently pressurized as to not be disrupted or displaced. Thus, we say that the cylinder is disrupted when the stellar wind has dis- connected the cylinder from this inflow. Equivalently stated, the cylinder has been radially displaced a dis- tance ∆dcol. = 2s away from the star. The stellar wind imparts a force on the column equal to the pressure times the cross sectional area, A(t) = 2sL(t) = 2s(cid:104)u(cid:105)t, so that Fwind(t) = A(t)P(cid:63),total(a) = 2s(cid:104)u(cid:105)tP(cid:63),total(a). Thus, the acceleration of the cylinder from the stellar wind is acol.(t) = Fwind(t)/M (t) = 4s(cid:104)u(cid:105)P(cid:63),total(a)/ M . Solving for the time of disruption from the equation of motion, ∆dcol. = acol.t2 disrupt/2 = 2s, yields (cid:115) tdisrupt = 2 M (cid:104)u(cid:105)P(cid:63),total(a) . (33) 2, the intermediate From Table has M = 3.8 × 1010 g s−1. From Table 1 P(cid:63),total(a) = 1.3 × 10−6 dyn cm−2. Approximating (cid:104)u(cid:105) = 25 km s−1 from Figure 11, we get tdisrupt ≈ 1.5 × 105 s. The regime Figure 8. Quasi-steady state time series of the Tidal simulations for the intermediate stellar wind case. The wind starts confined in panel (a) but continues to grow and extend outwards as seen in panel (b). Eventually the column grows out too far and can no longer maintain itself in the face of growing stellar wind strength. In panel (c) we see the disruption of the column, returning back to a confined state as seen in panel (d). The time lapsed between panel (a) and (d) is 2.7 × 105 s. This process repeats continuously. This figure is available online as an animation, showing several periods of the quasi-steady state. Figure 9. Total densities along the substellar ray for the Rogue simulations with no stellar wind (dotted), a weak stellar wind (dashed) and an intermediate stellar wind (solid). When a stellar wind is present, shocks and standoffs between the planetary and stellar wind occur. A several order of magnitude decrease in den- sity occurs at the standoff location. Note that weak stellar winds do not affect the solution below the sonic point (red vertical), while a stronger stellar wind can alter the solution (see zoomed insert). In fact strong winds force a planetary breeze solution without a sonic point (lack of solid red vertical). The dark green vertical line is the UV depth one, and the orange vertical line shows the sonic surface of the stellar wind, corresponding to where it is shocked on the planetary wind (present only for the intermediate wind within the plotted region). stellar wind does not affect the planetary outflow interior to the sonic point unless it is strong enough to confine the planetary wind to a breeze. 4.6. Stellar wind in Rotating run: effects of a full stellar environment 16 20020y (Rp)4020020x (Rp)20020y (Rp)4020020x (Rp)10201019101810171016Density (g/cm3)-10.0-7.5-5.0-2.5x (Rp)102110201019101810171016Density (g/cm3)No WindWeak WindInter. WindSonic PointUV Depth OneStellarShockMcCann et al. Table 2 Planetary mass-loss rates Figure 10. Snapshots of the density structure of a fully-launched hydrodynamic, escaping planetary outflow with varying stellar wind strengths in a full rotating frame. The first row shows slices in the orbital plane (z = 0) and the second row shows vertical slices perpendicular to the planet -- star axis, y = 0. The columns are for various wind strengths parameterized by: n(cid:63),0 = 1.5 × 103 cm−3 (left), n(cid:63),0 = 1.5 × 104 cm−3 (middle), and n(cid:63),0 = 7.0 × 104 cm−3 (right). For the weakest wind, the arms are able to extend to the boundary of our domain, implying a significant torus-like structure may be possible. For the intermediate-stellar-wind case, the gas is still able to significantly extend outwards but is eventually confined. Lastly, the strongest wind is able to completely confine the outflow into a cometary-like structure. This figure is available online as an animation, showing the evolution of the outflow when a stellar wind is introduced at t = 5 × 105 s until t = 2 × 106 s. time lapsed between Figure 12(a) and Figure 12(d) is 1.8 × 105 s, close to our order of magnitude estimate. We can also plug the disruption time into the length at the time of disruption and get L(tdisrupt) ≈ 30Rp, again in good agreement with what can be seen in Figure 12(b). Velocity and density profiles along the x -- axis are pro- vided in Figure 13. The zoomed inset again shows sig- nificant differences near the wind's sonic point between planetary outflows that are winds (no and intermediate stellar winds) and those that are breezes (strong stellar wind). In the velocity profiles, the locations where the x -- and y -- velocity profiles intersect at zero are the stag- nation or standoff points of the outflow. The shocks can also be seen where the x -- velocity magnitudes suddenly decrease. Again all velocity profiles for planetary winds are identical until they are shocked on their stellar wind outside their sonic point, while the confined breeze solu- tion differs substantially. n(cid:63),0 (cm−3) Rogue (g s−1) Tidal (g s−1) Rotating (g s−1) 0.0 1.5×103 1.5×104 7.0×104 generate a polygonal mesh of our data, the normal of which is given by the gradient. Then by projecting the interpolated velocity into this normal and multiplying by the interpolated density and area of a mesh element, we get the mass-loss rate through that surface. Summing the mass-loss rate over the entire triangulated sphere we then arrive at the total mass-loss rate of the planet. We perform the calculation at 0.8 Rp, 2 Rp, and 15 Rp and find excellent agreement. Presented here are the time- averaged results averaged over those three radii. Note. -- The time-averaged mass-loss rate of the sustained planetary outflow (1 × 106 s ≤ t ≤ 2 × 106 s). 4.7. Planetary mass-loss rates For the four wind strengths studied here in the Rotat- ing case, Table 2 list the mass-loss rates averaged over the last 106 s of our simulation. To determine the mass- loss rates we choose a sphere of radius larger than our reset radius and calculate the flux of material through the sphere. We use the marching cubes algorithm to 4.0×1010 3.9×1010 3.9×1010 3.6×1010 3.9×1010 3.8×1010 3.8×1010 3.5×1010 3.8×1010 3.8×1010 3.8×1010 3.4×1010 Notice that all rates for a given simulation are within 5 % of each other across all wind strengths except for the strongest wind (n(cid:63),0 = 7.0 × 104 cm−3). In this case, the outflow is a breeze and has a noticeably lower mass-loss 17 402002040y (Rp)WeakIntermediateStrong4020020x (Rp)20020z (Rp)4020020x (Rp)4020020x (Rp)10201019101810171016Density (g/cm3)McCann et al. Figure 11. The velocity magnitude (top), temperature (top middle), neutral density (bottom middle) and neutral fraction (bottom) for the Rotating simulation for three stellar wind strengths: weak (n(cid:63),0 = 1.5 × 103 cm−3, left), intermediate (n(cid:63),0 = 1.5 × 104 cm−3, middle) and strong (n(cid:63),0 = 7.0 × 104 cm−3, right). Quivers in top row indicate direction of velocity, and the black circles demarcate Rp. 18 201001020y (Rp)WeakIntermediateStrong201001020y (Rp)201001020y (Rp)201001020x (Rp)201001020y (Rp)201001020x (Rp)201001020x (Rp)0102030405060v (km/s)103104T (K)103104105nH (cm3)103102101100Neutral FractionMcCann et al. Table 3 Length scales in outflows Rogue (Rp) Tidal (Rp) Rotating (Rp) rτ =1 rsonic 1.02 1.97 1.02 1.81 1.02 1.81 Note. -- The substellar radii of various length scales. M ∝ M−1 p F0. Furthermore, our mass-loss rate for the Rotating simulation without a stellar wind finds good agreement with Debrecht et al. (in press). Here they explored a similar planet and ionizing flux,19 finding an M = 3.35 × 1010 g s−1. For reference, in Table 3 we provide the time-averaged sonic radius and the radius where optical depth to ion- izing photons is one for our simulations. These either did not change over the wind strengths, or were non- existent such as the sonic radius for the breezes. The only discernible difference is in the sonic radius between the Rogue and Tidal or Rotating simulations. This dif- ference results from the tidal forces helping to accelerate the gas to supersonic velocities earlier than occurs in the Rogue simulation. 5. OBSERVATIONAL CONSEQUENCES: LYMAN-α TRANSITS AND SPECTRUM To explore the observational consequences of the fea- tures found in § 4, we perform synthetic observations of the Rotating runs across three stellar wind strengths. Through these synthetic observations we are able to probe the spatial extent of escaping hydrogen via obscu- ration maps, transit light curves, and spectra. A number of lines have been seen in escaping planetary winds. We focus our synthetic observations around Lyman-α as it is the feature with the greatest number of high-confidence detections. By comparing features seen in synthetic ob- servations, we can search for unique signatures to obser- vationally disentangle our different physical scenarios. The synthetic observation procedure is discussed in § 5.1, and the results for our three scenarios are pre- sented in § 5.2. We comment on the conditions in which we expect observational signals to persist in § 5.3. In § 5.4 we review current observations and tentatively sug- gest which regimes they may fall into. Note that our simulation is for a generic hot Jupiter, and we only seek to provide context for features that have already been observed and predict some we may yet to discover. 5.1. Procedure To perform synthetic observations we begin by con- structing an image plane defined by x = 0, which shares its origin with the planet and is perpendicular to the substellar ray between the planet and the star. We then solve the equation of radiative transfer along rays that emanate from the observer through each pixel in the im- age plane. The observer is arbitrarily chosen to be one- hundred parsecs away from the system's barycenter on the opposite side of the image plane from the star, such that rays within the domain are virtually parallel. This 19 Same mass and flux; however, different initial conditions led to a different τ = 1 surface. Figure 12. Time series of burping in a full-rotating frame for the intermediate wind for the Rotating simulation. In panel (a), the outflow is confined within a dayside arm. As the arm continues to grow it get pushed outwards by the stellar wind as seen in panel (b). Eventually the arm grows out too far and is completely blown out from the system and detaches from the rest of the outflow as seen in panel (c). Afterwards in panel (d), we can see that the outflow is in a similar state to our initial panel and the process will repeat. The time between panels (a) and (d) is 1.8 × 105 s. Available online as an animation, showing several periods of the quasi-steady state. rate, consistently about 10 % lower than the average of the other three wind strengths. This is in agreement with the fact that the stellar wind is now in direct contact with the planetary wind base, which adds additional pressure that the planetary breeze must overcome. These mass-loss rates are about an order of magnitude lower than those found in the fiducial case of Tripathi et al. 2015, who modeled an order of magnitude higher ionizing flux for a planet twice as massive in a simula- tion analogous to our Tidal simulation with n(cid:63),0 = 0.0. M = 1.9 × 1011 g s−1, is in excel- Their mass-loss rate of lent agreement with ours when adjusted using the scaling from Murray-Clay et al. (2009) for energy limited escape, 19 402002040y (Rp)20020x (Rp)402002040y (Rp)20020x (Rp)10201019101810171016Density (g/cm3)McCann et al. Figure 13. Left: Density profiles for the no-stellar-wind, intermediate-stellar-wind and strong-stellar-wind cases of the Rotating simulation (Figure 2(c) and Figures 10(b) and 10(c) respectively). From the zoomed inset we can see significant deviation in the density interior to the sonic point in the high wind case. Unlike for weaker winds, the high wind case does not have a sonic surface (notice the lack of a solid red line over plotted on the dashed and dotted lines), and has been confined to a breeze. Right: Velocity profiles for the same three simulations. Where both the x -- and y -- velocities are zero is a standoff point between the planetary outflow and the stellar wind. Shocks in the velocity profile can be seen as sudden changes to the velocity profile, near the Coriolis length for the no-stellar-wind case, and purely by coincidence at the Hill Radius for the intermediate-stellar-wind case. The velocity profiles for the no-stellar-wind and intermediate-stellar-wind cases are in excellent agreement prior to shocking. produces an obscuration map appropriate for the mid- dle of the planet's transit across the star. We produce observations at various orbital phases by rotating the im- age plane around the barycenter, Figure 14 (see § 2.8 of Murray and Dermott (1999) for an example of a rotation matrix in terms of Keplerian elements). As our simula- tion is local, the orbital phases which we can observe are limited by the box size. Yet more limiting is the extent of the outflow in our domain, which in practice conser- vatively limits the accessible orbital phases to φ = ±25◦. We do not model the stellar Lyman-α spectrum or interstellar extinction in this work. We instead calcu- late the optical depth through the planetary outflow as a function of frequency by integrating the absorption coef- ficient along each ray, τν =(cid:82) αLyα(ν, s)ds. The absorp- tion coefficient for Lyman-α is given by (cid:16) 1 − e−hν/kBT (s)(cid:17) πe2 mec αLyα(ν, s) = nHI(s) f12 φVoigt(ν, s). (34) Here e is the elementary charge, me the mass of an elec- tron, c the speed of light, f12 = 0.4164 the absorption oscillator strength between n = 1 and n = 2 for hydrogen and φVoigt(ν, s) is the Voigt profile. Note that the term in the parentheses is a correction to absorption for stim- ulated emission. Since our simulations are already in the star's rest frame, when calculating the Voigt line profile we only need to shift the Doppler broadening component by the projected bulk velocity of the fluid. We take for granted that observers account for systematic velocities, e.g., the relative velocity between the system and the ob- server and orbital motion of the star, and neglect these in our presentation. From the optical depth, we calculate the stellar disc averaged obscuration fraction Figure 14. Schematic of viewing angle through the simulation (bounded by the rectangle) in the orbital plane. The dashed lines show the extent of the outflow transiting the star at a given orbital phase. The half-circle centered on the star represents the orbit of the planet around the star, with major ticks every 10◦ and minor ticks every 5◦. While the image plane is defined on this circle, rays extend through the entire domain by entering and exiting at the boundaries. We only take our observations out to φ = ±25◦, as for some simulations, larger angles do not intersect any of the outflow. All distances and sizes are to scale. Refer to Figure 11 of Carroll-Nellenback et al. (2017) for a global schematic. for comparisons to observational spectra. Here A is the area of the stellar disc defined as the surface S, dΣ is the infinitesimal area element, I is the intensity observed and I0 the intensity of light emitted from the star. Note we only consider absorption without emission, such that τν = ln(I0/I). We do not model the stellar line, nor do we consider spatial variation across the stellar sur- (cid:90)(cid:90) (cid:18) I0 − I (cid:19) dΣ S I0 A (cid:104)Oν(cid:105) = (cid:90)(cid:90) (cid:0)1 − e−τν(cid:1) dΣ A S , (35) 20 = -10.0-7.5-5.0-2.5x (Rp)102110201019101810171016Density (g/cm3)No WindInter. WindStrong WindSonic PointUV Depth OneCoriolisStellarShockStellarShock-7.0-5.0-3.0-1.01.03.05.07.0x (Rp)40302010010203040Velocityx(km/s)40302010010203040Velocityy(km/s)40302010010203040Velocityy(km/s)40302010010203040Velocityy(km/s)No WindInter. WindStrong WindSonic PointUV Depth OneHill RadiusCoriolisCoriolisHill Radius=+25(t=+10.5 h)=0(t=0 h)=25(t=10.5 h)face, including limb effects. Typically obscuration will be strongest near line center, where observers cannot make accurate measurements due to geocoronal confu- sion and interstellar extinction, and weakest at large ef- fective Doppler velocities. Thus, a quoted transit ob- scuration will depend on the frequency domain of the spectrograph and methodology for removing geocoronal confusion. McCann et al. For our synthetic observations we chose to measure the obscuration between 1215.26 A to 1216.08 A (equiva- lent Doppler velocities of −100 km s−1 to 100 km s−1), ignoring obscuration between 1215.53 A to 1215.81 A (−35 km s−1 to 35 km s−1) to model geocoronal confu- sion and ISM absorption. Note that negative velocities probe gas moving away from the star with blueshifted ab- sorption, and conversely positive velocities correspond to gas infalling towards the star with redshifted absorption. Within this spectral range we further subdivide our ob- servations into four unique frequency domains to retrieve dimensionless equivalent widths for transit observations. The dimensionless equivalent widths are calculated as (cid:90) νb νa W = (cid:90) νb νa (cid:104)Oν(cid:105) dν ∆ν = (cid:104)1 − e−τν(cid:105) dν ∆ν . (36) Here νa and νb define the spectral range with a width of ∆ν = νb − νa. Observations integrated over the red range, 1215.81 A to 1216.06 A (35 km s−1 to 100 km s−1), are referred to as "Red" and those over the blue range, 1215.26 A to 1215.53 A (−100 km s−1 to −35 km s−1), as "Blue." The measurement called "Both" refers to an integration over the entire observational range (excluding the geocornal confusion region), which covers both the red and blue wings. The last measurement called "Full" is integrated over the full observed spectrum as if there existed no geo- coronal confusion or interstellar extinction. Typically obscuration is largest near line-center and the "Full" line displays the strongest obscuration. However, when the bulk velocity significantly shifts the Doppler broadening core away from line center, the dimensionless equivalent width will be larger in the respective wing as the wings are normalized over a smaller ∆ν. As the "Full" line probes the total column density, it is suggestive of other hydrogen lines, or metals with abundance proportional to hydrogen, that have no confusion at line center. As light rays take approximately 37.5 s to traverse the domain's width of 75Rp, during which the fluid structure does not significantly evolve, we are well justified in us- ing the fast-light approximation, and produce synthetic observations in post-processing. Less obviously justified is using a single static output for the entire orbit when performing our synthetic transits. Yet, there is only one regime of stellar winds, the intermediate regime, in which the simulation does not reach a steady-state. Using ap- propriately timed outputs from the hydrodynamic simu- lation would have no effect for systems in steady-state, so the only concern would be for the intermediate stel- lar wind regime. Yet, since the transit duration of the planetary disc takes ∼4 h and the non-steady-state inter- mediate regime has a periodicity of ∼50 h, it is acceptable to use a static frame for the duration of a single transit observation. As it is arbitrary when a transit might oc- Figure 15. Upper Left: The transit (duration shown in vertical dashed lines) for the weak stellar (Figure 10(a)) wind shows about a 1 % enhancement at observable frequencies (Red, Blue, Both) over the planetary disc (dashed horizontal line). The Full line is for ob- servations without geocoronal confusion and interstellar extinction, telling us that most of the obscuration occurs in this domain. Up- per Right: The spectrum is symmetric about line-center (vertical dashed line) with some natural broadening enhancement over the planetary disc (horizontal dashed line) for the red and blue regions during transit (0◦ and 3◦). Out of transit (5◦) the only appreciable absorption occurs from Doppler broadening in the geocoronal con- fusion domain, which is unobservable. Lower Panels: Snapshots at direct transit of the (50 × 20)Rp spatial obscuration at various spectral frequencies denoted by their equivalent Doppler velocities. The stellar disc is denoted by the red circle and the white bar pro- vides the length scale at the plane of the planet. All line of sight projected velocities are below 50 km s−1, with the fastest perhaps detectable feature being the dayside arm at positive velocities (red- shifted absorption) occurring before direct transit. Available online as an animation, showing transit in the obscuration maps for the Red, Blue and Both frequency domains, as well as a sweep of the spectrum at φ = 0◦. cur during the periodic disruptions, since the disruption is not related to the orbital period but rather the stellar ionizing flux and wind strength, we perform synthetic ob- servations at the three different phases shown in Figures 12(a), 12(b), and 12(c). 5.2. Synthetic observations of planetary escape in stellar environments 5.2.1. Weak-stellar-wind regime With a weak stellar wind, observations are symmetric both in the spectra and transit light curves, as seen in Figure 15. The observable obscuration comes primarily from the disc of the planet which occults 4.6 % of the stel- lar disc during its transit between φ = ±4.9◦, or between t = ±2 hours relative to direct transit. Since velocities of the outflowing planetary wind are well within the geo- 21 201001020True Anomaly (°)102101100Equivalent widthFullRedBlueBoth-9-6-30369Time (hours)2001000100200Velocity (km/s)102101100Average obscured fraction=0°=3°=5°1215.01215.51216.01216.5Wavelength (Å)v = -150 km/s10 Rpv = -100 km/s10 Rpv = -50 km/s10 Rpv = -30 km/s10 Rpv = 0 km/s10 Rpv = 30 km/s10 Rpv = 50 km/s10 Rpv = 100 km/s10 Rpv = 150 km/s10 Rp103102101100Obscuration fractionWeak-stellar-wind synthetic observationscoronal confusion and interstellar extinction limits, the outflow contributes a small enhancement (∼1 %) in the "Red" and "Blue" spectral regions due to natural broad- ening near mid-transit, when the absorption column is largest. Given that significant detections have been made far outside the geocoronal confusion limits, yet our parame- ters show no such features, it is worth asking how much the outflow velocity would need to increase for our re- sults to produce significant absorption in the "Red" and "Blue" wings. To explore this question we consider an al- ternative frequency domain from 1215.33 A to 1216.02 A (−85 km s−1 to 85 km s−1), which we call our "Low" domain, and ignore obscuration between 1215.59 A to 1215.75 A (−20 km s−1 to 20 km s−1). We note that our weak stellar wind is the only scenario which does not produce significant obscuration in our fiducial spectral ranges, so we only consider the "Low" spectral range here. This adjustment mimics making observations of outflows boosted by 15 km s−1 in our standard spectral domains, which we justify as follows. Since natural broadening wings are not substantial in our weak wind spectra, the line profile for the obscuration is primarily due to Doppler broadening. Hence, where absorption is significant, φν ∝ exp(−u2/b2), where u is the velocity and b =(cid:112)2kT /µ is the Doppler broadening parameter. Then integrating over our "Low" domain is equivalent to integrating over our standard domain in a wind of faster outflow velocities e−u2/b2 du = e−w2/b2 dw. (37) (cid:90) ub±s ua±s (cid:90) ub ua Here [ua, ub] is our fiducial range and s is the shifted boost which relates our "Low" domain to our fiducial range. Note that, w = u ∓ s with a top sign for the red range and bottom sign for blue. Thus from Eq. (37), we find that comparisons between our shifted "Low" ob- servations and our standard observations approximately corresponds to comparing to an outflow boosted by 15 km s−1. This is a first-order approximation as out- flows with larger velocities may have different neutral fractions and overall structure. The transit measurement for the "Low" domain is pre- sented in Figure 16. Compared to the fiducial observa- tional range, the absorption is still symmetric at φ = 0◦, while prior to φ = 0◦ there is substantially more red ab- sorption. Conversely, roughly three hours after transit blue is more dominant, though at a much lower ampli- tude than red is prior to transit. This is due to which arm of the outflow is being probed. The dayside arm (redshift) moves faster than the nightside arm moving away from the star (blueshift). Thus, a more significant absorption feature can be seen in the red wings of the spectra leading the direct transit (see the v = 30 km s−1 snapshot of Figure 15). Note that in the dayside arm, some gas is still moving away from the star as it has been turned by the Coriolis force (see Figure 11(a)). This becomes more pronounced at larger distances from the planet, and the "Blue" measurement eventually domi- nates over "Red" prior to φ = −20◦. 5.2.2. Intermediate-stellar-wind regime McCann et al. Figure 16. Transit light curve of an outflow interacting with a weak stellar wind, observed in our "Low" wavelength window of 1215.33 A to 1216.02 A (−85 km s−1 to 85 km s−1). These ob- servations, when compared with our standard window 1215.26 A to 1216.08 A (−100 km s−1 to 100 km s−1), approximate planetary outflows boosted by 15 km s−1. With larger outflow velocities, sig- nificantly more obscuration occurs. Before transit there is signifi- cant absorption at redder wavelengths due to the leading dayside arm outflow infalling towards the star. Long before transit, blue absorption is seen due to the Coriolis force turning the dayside arm at large distances. The nightside outflow, probed after transit, is slower and produces a weaker signal. Absorption is dominated by the naturally-broadened line wings and is roughly symmetrical between the red and blue wing. For the intermediate-stellar-wind regime, we generated synthetic observations from the static frames of Figures 12(a), 12(b), and 12(c). We found that though the transit signal quantitatively differs between snapshots, it qualitatively remains the same. Therefore, in Figure 17 we present the results from the Figure 12(b) snapshot, which showed the strongest signal, to probe the gen- eral features of the intermediate regime. As discussed in § 5.1, the disruption timescale is ∼50 h and a tran- sit is only ∼4 h. While using a static output is accurate enough for transit, if we want to create accurate transit light curves spanning ∼22 h (φ = [−25◦, 25◦]), we need to perform observations at times consistent with the orbital phases. Therefore, we also produce three time-resolved transit light curves displayed in Figure 18, beginning at φ = −25◦ for Figures 12(a), 12(b), and 12(c). As in the weak stellar wind case, during the planetary transit there is not much enhancement over the planetary disc. However, unlike for the weak stellar wind, we find a significant feature that precedes the planetary transit within our standard frequency domain. As seen in the spectra of Figure 17, when probing the dayside arm at φ = −10◦ and φ = −20◦ the features are not from the naturally-broadened wings of a Voigt profile, but from the Doppler-broadened core. Therefore, while the stel- lar wind may enhance the column density, the primary cause of the increased obscuration is due to negatively- accelerated material. In other words, the stellar wind is 22 201001020True Anomaly (°)10-210-1100Equivalent widthLow FullLow RedLow BlueLow Both-9-6-30369Time (hours)McCann et al. Figure 17. Panels have the same layout as Figure 15, but are now for our intermediate stellar wind (specifically Figure 12(b)). Upper Left: Only ∼1 % enhancement over the planetary disc oc- cultation occurs during transit, but prior to the transit strong blue features are visible.Upper Right: No significant spectral asymme- try is apparent during direct transit. Prior to transit, blue features dominate. Lower Panels: Between 0 km s−1 to 50 km s−1 one can clearly see the truncated dayside arm, while at large negative ve- locities we can see that further upstream the extended disrupted outflow causing significant obscuration. Available online as an ani- mation, showing transit in the obscuration maps for the Red, Blue and Both frequency domains, as well as a sweep of the spectrum at φ = 0◦. pushing the outflowing gas towards the observer. The strong blue-shifted absorption signal is strongest, ∼20 % for Figure 12(b), but is present in all three snap- shots in time. The major difference is the amplitude of the signal, which is weakest for Figure 12(c) at ∼5 %. Comparisons between Figures 12(b) and 12(c) show that these two phases have the most and least amount of dense gas being blown out by the stellar wind. Whether the pre-transit signal ever disappears depends on the timescale for the stellar wind to disperse the dayside ma- terial, and the timescale for another disruption to occur. For our parameters, neutral material outwardly acceler- ated by the stellar wind is always around, and the signal is continuously present but modulated in amplitude. In Figure 18 we time-resolve the transit (in ∆φ = 2◦ in- crements) by ray-tracing through a series of appropriate simulation snapshots. We chose three times that corre- spond to φ = −25◦, thereby measuring the transit at var- ious disruption stages (those being Figure 12(a), 12(b), and 12(c)). Generally, the signal seen mimics two bodies transiting the star in quick succession -- a double transit. The first "object" (which is just the outwardly acceler- ated dayside outflow) enters transit tens of hours prior to the true transit of the planetary body. This would be Figure 18. Three time-resolved transit observations of the unre- solved Lyman-α line (our Both domain) for the intermediate stel- lar wind. Each transit is labeled by the time corresponding to φ = −25◦, which in time order correspond to Figure 12(a), 12(b), and 12(c). Given the non-static disrupting dayside outflow, the pre-transit signal varies throughout the various stages of the dis- ruption. The signal typically appears to resemble a "double tran- sit," in which a comparable signal to the transiting body appears and disappears prior to the transit of the planet. We note that this feature is strong when only the blue wing of the line is consider (c.f. Figure 17). easy to disentangle with a spectrally resolved observation as it is entirely biased bluewards of line center; however, as seen in Figure 18, an unresolved observation could produce such "double transits." Additionally, an opti- cal transit observation would not find any such "Trojan body," indicating it was instead neutral hydrogen from the dayside outflow. 5.2.3. Strong-stellar-wind regime For our strongest stellar wind we observe a highly confined cometary tail-like outflow (Figures 10(c) and 10(f)). This structure leads to a transit light curve that is strongly asymmetric both temporally and in its spectra (Figure 19). The blue features are due to the stellar wind acceler- ating the planetary outflow away from the star, so that neutral gas asymmetrically absorbs more efficiently at blueshifted velocities. Moreover, during transit substan- tial obscuration occurs at large velocities due to Doppler broadening skewed towards negative velocities. Shortly following the transit, blue obscuration starts increasing. This is the result of a continuously accelerated nightside arm being blown out at faster and faster velocities by the stellar wind, shifting the Doppler core to bluer frequen- cies. Notice that in the spectra at φ = 0◦, the star is not entirely obscured due to the confinement of the dayside arm, visible in the obscuration maps of Figure 19, and maximal obscuration is not obtained until later. We now ask whether this signal is due to a den- sity enhancement by stellar wind confinement. An en- hanced column density might increase absorption in the 23 201001020True Anomaly (°)102101100Equivalent widthFullRedBlueBoth-9-6-30369Time (hours)2001000100200Velocity (km/s)102101100Average obscured fraction=0°=10°=20°1215.01215.51216.01216.5Wavelength (Å)v = -150 km/s10 Rpv = -100 km/s10 Rpv = -50 km/s10 Rpv = -30 km/s10 Rpv = 0 km/s10 Rpv = 30 km/s10 Rpv = 50 km/s10 Rpv = 100 km/s10 Rpv = 150 km/s10 Rp103102101100Obscuration fractionIntermediate-stellar-wind synthetic observations201001020True Anomaly (°)102101100Equivalent widtht=1.64×106 st=1.70×106 st=1.76×106 s-9-6-30369Time (hours)McCann et al. Figure 19. Panels have the same layout as Figure 15, but are now for our strong stellar wind (Figure 10(c)). Upper Left: The tran- sit in the strong regime has significant blue enhancement over the planetary disc occultation during transit. Additionally, after the transit strong blue features are visible. Upper Right: The asym- metry during direct transit favoring blue absorption comes from gas moving away from the star at the outer edge of the planetary outflow. Conversely, after transit there are significant blue fea- tures due to the entire outflow being accelerated outwards. Lower Panels: The sharp confinement due to the stellar wind is easily visible in most panels. At large negative velocities the effects of the outer edge of the outflow being more strongly accelerated are visible. Available online as an animation, showing transit in the obscuration maps for the Red, Blue and Both frequency domains, as well as a sweep of the spectrum at φ = 0◦. naturally-broadened line wings. To understand the col- umn density enhancement one obtains from stellar wind confinement we make comparisons to the Rotating sim- ulation with no stellar wind. This has been done previ- ously in 2-D (c.f. Figure 8 of Stone and Proga 2009) and is reproduced for 3-D simulations in a rotating frame in Figure 20. We plot the column density along rays par- allel to the x -- axis in the orbital plane as a function of the impact parameter measured from the center of the planet.20 To make comparisons to models not done in a proper rotating frame, we have overlain the column density for our Rogue simulation, which has a roughly spherical out- flow. In the absence of a stellar wind (Rotating) the out- flow is confined to a torus around the star due to tidal forces. When a strong stellar wind is present (Strong Rotating) the outflow's shape is still toroidal due to the tidal forces, but is further constricted and thus enhanced by the stellar wind. 20 Here we chose ray trace as a function of impact parameters, rather than as a function of orbital phase, for direct comparison to Stone and Proga (2009). Figure 20. Column densities integrated through outflows with spherical (Rogue), toroidal (Rotating), and constricted toroidal (Rotating with a strong stellar wind -- Strong Rotating) geometries. For small impact parameters the column densities in all geometries match, as the outflow still behaves as if it is spherically symmet- ric until tidal forces or the stellar wind can significantly alter the flow into a torus. While the column density in the torus geometry should be roughly constant, notice that for the leading arm of the torus the density actually increases around 10Rp. By referring to Figures 10(a), we can see this density enhancement is due to the shock at the Coriolis length. Notice that outflow confined to a torus significantly enhances the column density over spherical outflows at large impact parameters. This can be understood by considering the area through which the planetary mass loss flux passes in each case. For a spherical outflow, this fluxing area is a sphere, which scales as r2, while for the torus the fluxing area is the constant-area end caps of a cylinder. Thus, as long as the velocity does not change and the outflow has reached ionization equilibrium, the neutral column density for a torus will remain constant. Given a fixed mass-loss rate, stellar wind constriction of the torus leads to a column density enhancement. This can be modeled by considering a cylinder of mass M , length L, and cross sectional radius r, radially con- stricted to a cylinder of length L and radius s. While the column through the cylinder, 2r to 2s, decreases by a fac- tor of s/r, the density increases by a factor of (r/s)2, so that column density is enhanced by r/s. Our strong stel- lar wind constricts the cross sectional radius roughly by half, seen by comparing Figures 10(d) and 10(f). While the mass-loss rate of a breeze is lower than the corre- sponding wind (Table 2), the difference is within ten per- cent for our parameters. Hence, relative to the weaker stellar wind cases, for our strong-stellar-wind planetary breeze, constriction increases the neutral density in the nightside arm by almost a factor of two. Another fac- tor of two comes from redirecting the escaping gas from the dayside arm into the nightside. Thus, we estimate a grand total enhancement of a factor of four. This es- timate matches what we see in the nightside arm of the constricted torus, between −30 Rp ≤ b ≤ −10 Rp, com- pared to the unconstricted torus (Figure 20). We conclude from Figure 20 that the stellar wind does 24 201001020True Anomaly (°)102101100Equivalent widthFullRedBlueBoth-9-6-30369Time (hours)2001000100200Velocity (km/s)102101100Average obscured fraction=0°=10°=20°1215.01215.51216.01216.5Wavelength (Å)v = -150 km/s10 Rpv = -100 km/s10 Rpv = -50 km/s10 Rpv = -30 km/s10 Rpv = 0 km/s10 Rpv = 30 km/s10 Rpv = 50 km/s10 Rpv = 100 km/s10 Rpv = 150 km/s10 Rp103102101100Obscuration fractionStrong-stellar-wind synthetic observations402002040Impact Parameter (Rp)101310141015101610171018Neutral Column Density (cm2)RogueRotatingStrongRotatingsubstantially enhance the neutral column density over that from a spherical outflow. However, tidal gravity and the Coriolis force -- by themselves confining the outflow to a torus -- can also produce substantial enhancement in the column density at large distances from the planet. In fact, for our parameters the strong stellar wind only increases the optical depth in the naturally-broadened wings by a factor of a few over the weak-stellar-wind case. This may seem contrary to previous work that suggested stellar wind confinement could greatly enhance the tran- sit signal, but the enhancement found in 2-D models with a stellar wind and no Coriolis force is similarly due to the geometry of constricting the flow to a torus (see Stone and Proga 2009). Therefore, while models that ne- glect the Coriolis force will see significant enhancement at large impact parameters due to a stellar wind, those that are done in a co-rotating frame shall not (unless the stellar wind strength is much larger compared to the tidal gravity than simulated here). We further note that our measured enhancement is modest at small impact parameters (b (cid:46) 10Rp), where most observations have so far probed. The lack of enhancement is due to the fact that the outflow will still behave roughly spherically until the outflow has been significantly altered by the tidal and Coriolis forces -- becoming toroidal. Lastly, and most importantly, an increased obscura- tion coming solely from naturally-broadened line wings from a low-velocity column density should be symmet- ric. In our simulations the predominant effect of a stel- lar wind is an asymmetric signal, as gas is exclusively accelerated away from the star. Therefore, symmetric observational features are likely not due to stellar wind confinement, which can be confirmed from the lack of an enhancement in the "Red" measurement of our strong- stellar-wind regime (Figure 19) relative to other stellar wind regimes. 5.3. Absorption outside direct transit A prediction of this work is that planetary winds are capable of significant obscuration at large distances from the planet. For our parameters, the ionization timescale is τion = (σHIF )−1 = 3.6 h. Generously av- eraging the outflow velocity to 40 km s−1, we calculate the gas has undergone nearly seven ionization timescales by φ = ±20◦.21 Thus, the existence of large scale signals from ionized gas may be surprising. However, note that after many ionizing timescales a gas does not become completely ionized; rather, it reaches ionization equilib- rium set by the detailed balancing of ionization and re- combination. Indeed for our simulations we have verified that the ionization fraction is within a few percent of equilibrium past 10 Rp. Apparent then by our synthetic observations in § 5.2, gas in ionization equilibrium is sufficient to produce large-scale observable signals. However, these simula- tions were performed for a low ionizing flux analogous to the quiet Sun. We now ask if signals should persist at higher ionizing fluxes by considering each contribution to the optical depth. To order of magnitude the optical depth is τν = (1− X)NH σLyα(ν), where X is the ioniza- 21 Note the time relative to direct transit is not equivalent to the time it takes the gas to reach the location probed at the time relative to direct transit. McCann et al. tion fraction, NH is the total column density of hydrogen, and σLyα(ν) is the cross section of Lyman-α absorption. The impact of the outflow structure on σLyα(ν) is already discussed in § 5.2. The total column density depends both on the to- tal number density of hydrogen, nH,22 and the column length, L. The column length scales with the Coriolis length, which depends on F only through the velocity of the planetary outflow. We make the assumption that this dependence is weak and let L be independent of F . From Murray-Clay et al. (2009) we consider the two regimes of escape: energy-limited and radiation-limited. As more energy deposited into the atmosphere liberates more mass, in the energy-limited regime M ∝ F and for the radiation-limited regime M ∝ F 1/2.23 Since the cross section of the tidal torus only depends on L, which we keep constant, then M ∝ nH. Therefore, in the energy- limited regime NH = nHL ∝ F and in the radiation- limited regime NH = nHL ∝ F 1/2 With larger F one might suspect lower neutral frac- tions (1 − X), as the ionization rate increases. As the outflow at large distance is in ionization equilibrium ((1 − X)σHIF = αBnHX 2), the ionization fraction as a function of flux (cid:18)(cid:114) 1 + − 1 (cid:19) (cid:19)2(cid:33) 4αBnH σHIF (cid:32)(cid:18) αBnH σHIF X = 1 2 σHIF αBnH and 1 − X = αBnH σHIF + O , . (38) (39) Here we have Taylor expanded in αBnH/(σHIF ) as we are already in the ionized regime far in the outflow such that (1−X) (cid:28) 1. Then using the scalings for n, in the energy- limited regime, the neutral fraction does not change, (1−X) is independent of F , while in the radiation-limited regime the neutral fraction scales as (1−X) ∝ F −1/2. So while there are more ionizing photons at higher fluxes, there is also a higher number density to facilitate recom- bination, preventing the neutral fraction from decreasing rapidly with increasing flux. Taken all together τν ∝ F in the energy-limited regime and τν is independent of F in the radiation-limited regime. This suggests that as fluxes increase, the sig- nal increases until the radiation-limited regime, at which point the signal is saturated. Thus in systems similar to the ones simulated, these signals may indeed be robust. 5.4. Atmospheric escape observations As seen in § 5.2 it is possible to differentiate between our modeled stellar environments. Weak stellar winds produce the most symmetric transits and spectra. Par- ticularly fast planetary winds can produce pre-transit absorption that is skewed red due to the dayside arm infalling towards the star. Intermediate stellar winds are 22 Note that the total number density n = nH + ne (cid:54)= nH, where nH = nHI + nHII is the total number density of the hydrogen species. 23 In the radiation-limited regime more energy is lost through radiative processes and escape becomes less efficient. 25 marked by a quasi-static disrupted outflow, which man- ifests as time-varying blueshifted absorbing gas present significantly prior to transit. Lastly, strong stellar winds have strong spectral asymmetry during transit, little pre- transit obscuration, and increasing blue absorption post- transit from the strongly collimated tail being blown out by the stellar wind. Thus, to accurately distinguish be- tween stellar regimes, measurements both in and far out of transit are required. Note that even a few hours out of transit may be too close to transit, as it takes time for the stellar environment to accelerate the outflow. Unfor- tunately, since Lyman-α observations must be performed by expensive space-based telescopes, observations far out of transit are lacking. A general theme amongst comparisons to observations is that our predicted Lyman-α obscuration fractions are smaller than what is observed. While our planetary pa- rameters are marginally a hot Jupiter analog, there is no one-to-one correspondence with any observed system. Yet, this is unlikely to account for the entire difference between the observations and our simulations, as previ- ous modeling of specific systems also struggle to match observations, e.g., HD 209458 b in Murray-Clay et al. (2009). Since outflow velocities retrieved in similar mod- els are consistently too slow to explain the observations, it is widely thought that more exotic physics is needed (charge exchange, magnetic fields, etc.). However, we note that Eq. (19) implies that the asymptotic velocity u∞ depends on the energy spectrum of the ionizing pho- tons. A harder spectrum produces more energy per ion- ization generating larger ∆q∞ and thus larger u∞ (most easily conceptualized in the energy-limited regime, where radiative losses are minimal). Whether a more complete investigation of ionizing spectra can produce larger wind velocities merits investigation. To explore the possible consequences, we can lower the geocoronal confusion lim- its in post-processing to mimic faster outflows to zeroth order (see "Low" spectral frequency in § 5.2.1). To compare our models to observations we consider four different planetary systems, each of which has a distinctive signature. The first observed exoplanet un- dergoing escape, HD 209458 b, has a transiting decre- ment of (15 ± 4) % in Lyman-α flux from 1215.15 A to 1216.1 A (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2004).24 The spectrum was originally reported to be marginally asymmetric (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2003), but further measurements have not detected any significant asymmetry (Ben-Jaffel 2007). Since strong stellar winds significantly skew the signal bluewards, even during direct transit, we rule out the strong stellar wind regime. Without more measure- ments out of transit it is hard to distinguish between a weak and intermediate stellar wind. Our "Low" mea- surements, which decreased the geocoronal confusion by 15 km s−1, produced a roughly 15 % symmetric signal during transit. This could suggest that HD 209458 b might orbit a star with a relatively weak wind, and a hard ionizing spectrum. Alternatively, all absorption from this system may result from physics, such as charge exchange, not modeled here. In particular, symmetric enhancement of the naturally-broadened line wings due to stellar wind 24 Two other frequency bin decrements often cited: (8.9 ± 2.1) % from 1214.83 A to 1216.43 A, or (5 ± 2) % over the entire line 1210 A to 1220 A (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2008). McCann et al. confinement is not supported by our results. Next, transits from HD 189733 b, with optical occulta- tion of 2.4 %, found Lyman-α decrements of (5.0 ± 1.3) % for the entire line, (14.4 ± 6.6) % for the blue wing be- tween −230 km s−1 to −140 km s−1, and (7.7 ± 2.7) % for the red wing between 60 km s−1 to 110 km s−1 (Bourrier et al. 2013). We note that the observations have also seen significant variability in Lyman-α absorption over various epochs. However, this time variability is not in- dicative of an intermediate stellar wind, as the variability is during direct transit and not further out in the out- flow. Rather, this implies that the mass-loss rate may be periodically modulated, possibly by a spatially variable stellar wind (Vidotto et al. 2018) or a temporally flar- ing star -- consequences not probed by our steady stel- lar winds and ionizing flux. We note that the numeri- cal agreement with our strong-stellar-wind simulation for blue absorption during transit is coincidental because our modeled parameters match neither HD 189733 b nor the wavelength window of the observations. Furthermore, the asymmetric wavelength windows for these observa- tions make evaluating the red/blue asymmetry during transit challenging. Nevertheless we note that the red- wing absorption is enhanced over the optical, a feature not seen in our models except in our "Low" measure- ments. Moreover, our blue frequency range is nearly 100 km s−1 slower than the blue range probed here, sug- gesting that the blue-shifted material may have been ac- celerated by a much stronger, and possibly faster, stellar wind than what we have simulated. (2015)). The hot Neptune GJ 436 b has the strongest and most asymmetric observations of any observed transit. The transit is within the measurement error of being unde- tectable in the red wings except in post-transit, with an obscuration of (8.0 ± 3.1) %. For the blue wings the ob- scuration is significant ∼2 h before, (17.6 ± 5.2) %, dur- ing transit, (56.2 ± 3.6) %, and ∼2 h after the transit, (47.2 ± 4.1) % (Ehrenreich et al. It should be noted that due to lower surface gravity making the liberation of mass easier, atmospheric escape from hot Neptunes will likely be more dramatic than from hot Jupiters.25 Thus, while the observations roughly correspond to velocities seen in our strong-stellar-wind regime, which shows significant blue obscuration from the cometary-like tail being blown outwards by the stellar wind, GJ 436 b's wind is able to persist at larger orbital phases on the dayside. As observations see blue absorp- tion before transit the bow shock is not as close to the planet as in our simulation, which could be accomplished with a slightly weaker stellar wind. Conversely, consider if the outflow disruption seen in the intermediate regime occurs at the Coriolis length. This is plausible since at the Coriolis length the velocity has deflected away from the star, leading the planetary pressure support at the stellar wind interface to be completely thermal -- even if the outflow is supersonic (ram pressure dominated). Since GJ 436 b is a Neptune, its outflow velocities may be larger leading to a larger Coriolis length. Therefore, a persistent leading large-scale observational feature could be consistent with the intermediate-stellar-wind regime. 25 For Neptune g(cid:91) = ∼1100 cm s−2 v.s. g(cid:88) = ∼2730 cm s−2 for Jupiter, where (cid:91) represents Neptune. 26 Bourrier et al. (2016) suggest that a key component of GJ 436 b's observations can be explained by the ac- celeration of planetary gas by radiation pressure. Their model and the model reported here differ in several key respects. First, because the model in Bourrier et al. (2016) is a particle simulation, it does not include forces from the pressure gradient of the gas. As exemplified in the work reported here, pressure gradients cause gas to be launched from the planet's surface and accelerated to a non-zero bulk velocity away from the planet. Motivated by the fact that this launch velocity is much smaller than the large velocities probed in the line wings of Lyman-α observations, Bourrier et al. (2016) use as their starting condition a population of particles at ∼3 planetary radii with thermal velocities but no bulk velocity. Because this population lies within the planet's Hill radius, these particles cannot escape until they are substantially accel- erated either by radiation pressure or by the stellar wind, both of which are modeled through probabilistic interac- tions with the gas particles, including self-shielding. These choices have subtle but important consequences. First, this leads to a highly ionized planetary outflow (relative to our simulations), as the "static" particles are likely to be ionized outside τ = 1 while they wait to be accelerated (something they note in §3.3.3). In prac- tice, what this means is that the outflow becomes ionized enough to be optically thin to radiation pressure before it is accelerated out of the planet's potential well. In contrast, we find in our simulations that the planetary outflow is extremely optically thick out to more than 10 planetary radii, well beyond the planet's Hill sphere. The difference comes from the outflow velocity driven by gas pressure forces -- though small, this velocity is large enough to allow the planetary wind to leave the planet's Hill radius before reaching ionization equilibrium. Recall that optically thin radiation (τν (cid:28) 1) will only absorb a tiny fraction of the incoming flux by defini- tion, yet will do so throughout the entire outflow. In contrast, except at very large separations, we find that the planetary wind is predominately optically thick to the entire Lyman-α photon band. Thus, significant op- tically thin radiation pressure (not modeled) is not an important accelerant in the majority of our simulation box, and certainly in the regions dominating our syn- thetic observations. Optically thick radiation pressure (also not modeled), in contrast, may impact the velocity structure at the boundaries of our simulated outflow, ex- erting a force at the wind interface rather than uniformly throughout the outflow. As mentioned in § 6, optically thick radiation pressure may work in tandem with stellar wind pressure to shape the large scale structure and ve- locities of the planetary outflow, but it does not provide significant acceleration of the gas in the vicinity of the planet. This contrasts with Bourrier et al. (2016) who find that radiation pressure was found to be significant part of the acceleration of the outflow, a result that may not be surprising given that the model is accurate only after the particles have been significantly accelerated by the stellar wind or radiation pressure. Additionally, particle models that do not model inter- particle interactions cannot generate pressure forces, which is an important part of the impact of the stellar wind and optically thick radiation pressure as the force McCann et al. is distributed throughout the outflow.26 The impact of both optically thin and optically thick radiation pressure far from the planet merits further investigation in hydro- dynamic simulations. Lastly, 55 Cnc b does not have an optical transit de- tection, yet intriguingly a (7.5 ± 1.8) % decrement be- tween −76.5 km s−1 to 0 km s−1 was measured in the blue wings of Lyman-α at its inferior conjunction -- the loca- tion where a transit would occur if the planet was copla- nar (Ehrenreich et al. 2012). No detectable obscuration in the red wings was reported. This obscuration is in- terpreted as coming from the transit of a fraction of an extended hydrogen atmosphere. The spectral asymmetry in the observation suggestively indicates a strong stellar wind. 6. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK In summary, the stellar environment can play a signif- icant role in shaping planetary outflows. Through our bottom-up approach we have examined several compo- nents of the stellar environment in 3-D: ionizing radia- tion, tidal gravity, the Coriolis force and a stellar wind. While spatially resolved observations of these outflows are not feasible, we demonstrated that spectrally and temporally resolved transit observations may still illumi- nate the overall structure of the outflow. Alterations to the planetary outflow considered here come from orbital effects and the interaction with a stel- lar wind. Tidal gravity and the Coriolis force funnel the outflow into a torus with a dayside and nightside arm. The toroidal geometry enhances the column density at large distances over spherical outflows. Additionally the inclusion of non-inertial forces lead the outflow to shock on itself, justified by analysis of ballistic particle trajec- tory crossings. For stellar winds we find three unique regimes with respect to their effects on the planetary outflow. From our study of stellar environments and the morphology of planetary outflows we summarize the fol- lowing key points 1. Whether the planetary outflow is a wind or a breeze, depends in part on the stellar environment. However, if the the planetary outflow is a wind, then the mass-loss rate is insensitive to the stellar environment. 2. Large detectable signals may be present far outside of transit. 3. These large scale signals help probe the stellar en- vironment i. Weak stellar winds cannot restrain the plane- tary outflow, resulting in symmetric but weak transit signals. For particularly fast planetary outflows, a pre-transit dayside arm skewed redward of line center is visible. ii. Even a spatially and temporally steady inter- mediate stellar wind cause periodic disruption of the growing planetary outflow, leading to large blue asymmetries preceding transit. A 26 Our simulations show that the fluid is still collisional through- out the domain, due to Coulomb force's long range effect in the mostly ionized outflow. 27 double transit-like feature, from the disrupted dayside material, occurs at blue wavelengths. iii. Strong stellar winds cause cometary-like plan- etary outflows. Absorption is biased blue- wards during transit, and the cometary tail- like structure produces substantial blue ab- sorption post-transit. Absent from our discussion is radiation pressure from Lyman-α, which at the extremes behaves either in an optically thin or optically thick fashion. Recall that the total fraction of incoming flux absorbed by neutrals is the obscuration fraction, Oν = 1 − e−τν (spatially mapped for our outflows in § 5.2). Thus, the total work done by radiation pressure on the outflow is ∆Wν ∝ FνOν. Optically thick radiation (τν (cid:29) 1 → Oν ≈ 1) absorbs nearly all incoming flux at the edge of the outflow, and behaves akin to a stellar wind. Optically thin radiation (τν (cid:28) 1 → Oν ≈ τν) on the other hand, will only ab- sorb a tiny fraction of the incoming flux, which occurs throughout the entire outflow rather than at the edge. In our simulations, the (unmodeled) force exerted by op- tically thick photons would strongly dominate near the planet, and would exceed that of optically thin photons by at least a factor of two throughout the flow within our domain. We note that optically thick radiation pressure may behave similarly to stellar winds and be more appro- priate to these systems. However, radiation pressure will always act radially with respect to the star. In contrast, the stellar wind has a ram-pressure headwind effect from the planet's orbit and a thermal-pressure force normal to the planetary-stellar wind contact discontinuity -- neither of which are strictly radially outwards from the star. In future work, one can use the machinery presented here to analyze various stellar spectra, stellar time vari- ability (particularly important for M-stars), planetary and stellar magnetic fields, and the entrainment of heav- ier elements. Discussed in § A.3, heat conduction should be included to allow for more realistic stellar winds, i.e., coronal winds, and because it plays an important role on the planetary nightside. As previously mentioned, magnetic fields will play a dominant roll in shaping the outflow if planetary fields exceed 1 G. As most of the outflow is ionized, the planetary or stellar magnetic field may prevent certain features in the large-scale outflow from existing. Therefore, we emphasize again that our results will reflect systems with weak magnetic fields, and future works wishing to survey wider possibilities should implement them. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. AST- 1411536. Further thanks to Jim Stone, James Owen, and Jonathan Carroll-Nellenback for insightful numeri- cal discussions. We would also like to acknowledge the yt-project (Turk et al. 2011), which made possible the majority of our visualizations. REFERENCES Barnes, J. R., Haswell, C. A., Staab, D., & Anglada-Escud´e, G. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1012, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1713 [1] Beckwith, K., & Stone, J. M. 2011, ApJS, 193, 6, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/6 [3.1.1] McCann et al. Ben-Jaffel, L. 2007, ApJL, 671, L61, doi: 10.1086/524706 [1, 5.4] Ben-Jaffel, L., & Sona Hosseini, S. 2010, ApJ, 709, 1284, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/1284 [1] Bisikalo, D., Kaygorodov, P., Ionov, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, 19, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/19 [1] Black, J. H. 1981, MNRAS, 197, 553, doi: 10.1093/mnras/197.3.553 [2.1.1] Bourrier, V., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Ehrenreich, D., Tanaka, Y. A., & Vidotto, A. A. 2016, A&A, 591, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628362 [1, 5.4] Bourrier, V., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Dupuy, H., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220533 [1, 5.4] Carroll-Nellenback, J., Frank, A., Liu, B., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 2458, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3307 [1, 2.3.4, 4.1, 14] Chamberlain, J. W. 1961, ApJ, 133, 675, doi: 10.1086/147070 [A.1, A.1] Cohen, O., Kashyap, V. L., Drake, J. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 67, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/67 [1] Debrecht, A., Carroll-Nellenback, J., Frank, A., et al. in press [1, 4.1, 4.3, 4.7] Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium [2.1.1] Ehrenreich, D., Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., H´ebrard, G., et al. 2008, A&A, 483, 933, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809460 [1] Ehrenreich, D., Bourrier, V., Bonfils, X., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219981 [1, 5.4] Ehrenreich, D., Bourrier, V., Wheatley, P. J., et al. 2015, Nature, 522, 459, doi: 10.1038/nature14501 [1, 3, 5.4] Fulton, B. J., Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb [1] Garc´ıa Munoz, A. 2007, Planet. Space Sci., 55, 1426, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2007.03.007 [1, 4.1] Gombosi, T. I., van der Holst, B., Manchester, W. B., & Sokolov, I. V. 2018, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 15, 4, doi: 10.1007/s41116-018-0014-4 [2.3.4] Holmstrom, M., Ekenback, A., Selsis, F., et al. 2008, Nature, 451, 970, doi: 10.1038/nature06600 [1] Jensen, A. G., Redfield, S., Endl, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 751, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/86 [1] Krumholz, M. R., Stone, J. M., & Gardiner, T. A. 2007, ApJ, 671, 518, doi: 10.1086/522665 [3.1, 3.1.1] Kulow, J. R., France, K., Linsky, J., & Loyd, R. O. P. 2014, ApJ, 786, 132, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/132 [1] Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., & Cassinelli, J. P. 1999, Introduction to Stellar Winds (Cambridge University Press), 452 [2.2, 2.3.4, A.3, A.3] Lavie, B., Ehrenreich, D., Bourrier, V., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731340 [1] Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Ehrenreich, D., Vidal-Madjar, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913347 [1] Linsky, J. L., Yang, H., France, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 717, 1291, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/1291 [1] Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. 2013, ApJ, 776, 2, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/2 [1] Loyd, R. O. P., Koskinen, T. T., France, K., Schneider, C., & Redfield, S. 2017, ApJL, 834, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/834/2/L17 [1] Matsakos, T., Uribe, A., & Konigl, A. 2015, A&A, 578, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425593 [1] Miki´c, Z., Linker, J. A., Schnack, D. D., Lionello, R., & Tarditi, A. 1999, Physics of Plasmas, 6, 2217, doi: 10.1063/1.873474 [2.3.4] Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar system dynamics [5.1] Murray-Clay, R. A., Chiang, E. I., & Murray, N. 2009, ApJ, 693, 23, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/23 [1, 2.1.1, 2.3.2, 2.4, 12, 3.2.2, 4.1, 4.7, 5.3, 5.4] Oklopci´c, A., & Hirata, C. M. 2018, ApJL, 855, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaada9 [1] Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei (University Science Books) [2.1.1, 2.1.1] Owen, J. E., & Adams, F. C. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3761, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1684 [1] Owen, J. E., & Wu, Y. 2013, ApJ, 775, 105, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/105 [1] Parker, E. N. 1958, ApJ, 128, 664, doi: 10.1086/146579 [1, A.1] 28 McCann et al. Pierrehumbert, R. T. 2010, Principles of Planetary Climate Verner, D. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., & Yakovlev, D. G. [2.3.2] 1996, ApJ, 465, 487, doi: 10.1086/177435 [2.1.1] Schneiter, E. M., Esquivel, A., Villarreal D'Angelo, C. S., et al. Vidal-Madjar, A., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., D´esert, J.-M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 1666, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw076 [1] Seager, S., & Sasselov, D. D. 2000, ApJ, 537, 916, doi: 10.1086/309088 [1] 2003, Nature, 422, 143, doi: 10.1038/nature01448 [1, 5.4] -- . 2008, ApJL, 676, L57, doi: 10.1086/587036 [1, 24] Vidal-Madjar, A., D´esert, J.-M., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., et al. Spake, J. J., Sing, D. K., Evans, T. M., et al. 2018, Nature, 557, 2004, ApJL, 604, L69, doi: 10.1086/383347 [1, 5.4] 68, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0067-5 [1] Stone, J. M., & Gardiner, T. A. 2010, ApJS, 189, 142, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/142 [3.1] Stone, J. M., Gardiner, T. A., Teuben, P., Hawley, J. F., & Simon, J. B. 2008, ApJS, 178, 137, doi: 10.1086/588755 [3.1] Stone, J. M., & Proga, D. 2009, ApJ, 694, 205, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/205 [1, 2.3.4, 4.1, 5.2.3, 20] Trammell, G. B., Li, Z.-Y., & Arras, P. 2014, ApJ, 788, 161, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/161 [1] Tremblin, P., & Chiang, E. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 2565, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts212 [1, 2.3.4] Vidal-Madjar, A., Huitson, C. M., Bourrier, V., et al. 2013, A&A, 560, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322234 [1] Vidotto, A. A., & Bourrier, V. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 4026, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1543 [3.3] Vidotto, A. A., Lichtenegger, H., Fossati, L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 5296, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2130 [2.3.4, 3.2.2, 3.3, 5.4] Watson, A. J., Donahue, T. M., & Walker, J. C. G. 1981, Icarus, 48, 150, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(81)90101-9 [A.1] Woods, T. N., Rottman, G. J., Bailey, S. M., Solomon, S. C., & Worden, J. R. 1998, Sol. Phys., 177, 133, doi: 10.1023/A:1004912310883 [3.3] Tripathi, A., Kratter, K. M., Murray-Clay, R. A., & Krumholz, Yelle, R. V. 2004, Icarus, 170, 167, M. R. 2015, ApJ, 808, 173, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/173 [1, 3.1, 3.3, 4.2, 4.7, C] Turk, M. J., Smith, B. D., Oishi, J. S., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 9, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/9 [6] APPENDIX A. BERNOULLI CONSTANT A.1. Overview of Bernoulli's Constant The formalism of Bernoulli's constant is useful since it gives analytic solutions to the atmospheric escape prob- lem, potentially negating the need for numerical simula- tions. One widely cited example of a quasi-analytic solu- tion is Watson et al. (1981), who used conduction and a delta function for ionization heating to simulate hydrody- namic winds of our solar system's early terrestrial plan- ets.27 One method of retrieving the Bernoulli's constant is by integrating the energy equation along streamlines. Equation (14) can be rewritten in steady state as (cid:18) E + P ρ (cid:126)u · (cid:126)∇ (cid:19) + φ = G − L ρ . Take for now the following as the definition for ∆q (cid:126)u · (cid:126)∇ (∆q) ≡ G − L ρ . Then by substituting Eq. (A2) into Eq. (A1) and inte- grating along streamlines one retrieves the constant b = 1 2 u2 + h + φ − ∆q. (A3) Here we have made use of the specific enthalpy, h = + P/ρ, where is the specific internal energy. Equa- tion (A3) is the specific Bernoulli constant, which is phys- ically motivated by conservation of energy yet is not the total specific energy. Rather b is the total energy minus the total heat added to the fluid. When external heat is added to the fluid, it becomes either kinetic, internal or potential energy, so for b to remain constant the added energy must be subtracted off the total energy. At first glance it may seem challenging to invert Eq. (A2); however, recall that the convective derivative, 27 They used numerics to iteratively solve the steady state sys- tem of equations (information contained in the Bernoulli constant plus further assumptions), as opposed to integrating the fluid equa- tions forward to a steady state. (A1) (A2) doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.02.008 [1] or directional derivative, ∇u = (cid:126)u· (cid:126)∇, differentiates a field along streamlines of the flow. This can be thought of as a 1-D problem, e.g., by using the Frenet-Serret frame, so that ∆q can be solved as ∆q = C(s) G − L ρus ds. (A4) (cid:90) Here C(s) is the streamline parameterized by s. Note that by definition in these coordinates us = (cid:126)u. This prescription for Bernoulli's constant can be ex- panded upon to include a wide range of physics. Typ- ically one describes the means of energy gain as either heat gained by or work done on the fluid. While conser- vative forces should be included in φ, non-conservative forces, i.e., ones with path-dependent work, require a path-dependent term, ∆W , measuring the accumulated work done along the path. We do not consider such forces in this work, but note that radiation pressure would be such a term. Another common example of heat flux through a fluid is conduction. One can quickly see that if conduction is redistributing heat that (cid:90) (cid:17) (cid:126)∇ ·(cid:16) κ (cid:126)∇T ρus ∆q = C(s) ds. (A5) The classic example of heat conduction in atmospheric escape, is Parker's spherically symmetric stellar wind model (1958), also see Chamberlain (1961). Recall that for spherical symmetry the constant mass-loss rate can be expressed as M = ρur2. Then Eq. (A5) can be solved so that b = 1 2 u2 + h + φ − κ ρu ∂T ∂r . (A6) This is equivalent to Eq. 12 of Chamberlain (1961). In this special case, an integral accounting for the accumu- lated heat is not needed and only local quantities matter. Since in a spherically symmetric system heat conduction can act only along streamlines, it cannot alter the total energy along a streamline except at the boundaries. This however is not generally true when the assumption of 29 spherical symmetry is relaxed, as heat flux from conduc- tion may now flow perpendicular to streamlines -- making ∆q path-dependent. A.2. Reversible flows A perhaps more intuitive derivation of Eq. (A4) for ∆q results from considering how the energy equation is constructed from Euler's equation, Eq. (13), and the fun- damental thermodynamic relationship for enthalpy. We use the powerful simplification that the flows are well ap- proximated as reversible, so that a flow experiencing only reversible pressure-volume work has a specific enthalpy (cid:18) ρ (cid:19)Γ ρ0 deposition in the stellar wind. This assumption allows us the relationship McCann et al. P = P0 . (A11) In order to retrieve Bernoulli's constant from the Eu- ler equation, as discussed in § A.2, we can reduce the pressure force per unit mass to a scalar gradient via the polytropic relationship, for Γ (cid:54)= 1 (cid:18) P (cid:19) ρ (cid:126)∇P ρ = Γ Γ − 1 (cid:126)∇ . (A12) dh = ¯dq + dP ρ . (A7) So then Here ¯dq is the differential heat flow into the system, e.g., a fluid element. Recall that ¯dq is a form of energy transfer and must be represented by an inexact differential, i.e., no path-independent integrated quantity, say q, is well defined. However, if a path, C, parameterized by s, is specified we can define the accumulated heat along said path bpoly = 1 2 u2 + Γ Γ − 1 P ρ + φ. For an ideal gas h = γ γ − 1 P ρ , (cid:90) C(s) ∆q(s) ≡ ¯dq. (A8) and (A13) (A14) (A15) For a fluid element the obvious path would be its streamline. Consider a fluid in a steady state, ∂t (∆q) = 0, then it is clear that the infinitesimal heat added at s, ¯dq(s), is the convective derivative of ∆q, i.e., (cid:104) (cid:105)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)s ¯dq(s) = (cid:126)u · (cid:126)∇ (∆q) . (A9) This is also apparent from Eq. (A8). Therefore consid- ering Eq. (A7) as material derivatives (cid:126)u · (cid:126)∇P ρ = (cid:126)u · (cid:126)∇h − (cid:126)u · (cid:126)∇(∆q). (A10) The term on the left-hand side of Eq. (A10) appears when you project Euler's equation into streamlines, a close analog to the energy equation. Integrating that equa- tion along the streamline likewise retrieves the Bernoulli constant for a compressible flow with external heating, Eq. (A3), which we have now shown is completely gen- eral as long as P dV work done by the flow is reversible, i.e., the only entropy production comes from heating. We have thus arrived at a more natural definition for ∆q in Eq. (A8). Typically ¯dq is understood in terms of a heating rate, which we would integrate with respect to time to get the total heat added. Referencing Eq. (A4), we note that ds/us is the time interval the fluid element spends near a given point and the rest of the integrand is the specific heating rate. A.3. Polytropic flows bpoly = bisen + γ − Γ (γ − 1)(Γ − 1) P ρ , where bisen is the isentropic Bernoulli constant (Eq. (A3) with ∆q = 0). Note that bisen is typically thought of as the total energy. Therefore, when Γ = γ, there is no bound atmosphere (bisen < 0) that can become unbound (bisen ≥ 0), and "adiabatic escape" is a misnomer. A correlated point is that there exist energy (or momentum transfer) require- ments at the sonic point for the outflow to go transonic. In other words, it is not only enough that energy be de- posited in the fluid, but there must also be non-zero en- ergy deposition below some threshold at the sonic point for the solution to be transonic (too large of an energy input at the sonic point reduces the outward pressure force, lessening the accelerating of the outflow). The justification of this constraint requires careful analysis of the momentum equation and is given in Lamers and Cassinelli (1999) § 4.1.4 for spherical winds.28 As discussed in § A.1, the Bernoulli constant can be used to analytically solve atmospheric escape. How- ever, the application has its limitations, namely the con- stant knows nothing of the ionization structure that di- rectly corresponds to ∆q. This makes outflows that are launched by ionization heating, or for which you wish to make synthetic observations, not accessible by the Bernoulli constant alone. However, for our stellar wind model we do not care about the ionization structure, and use the Bernoulli constant to derive its solution. We model the stellar wind as a spherically-symmetric, isen- tropic wind (polytropic outflow with Γ = γ). To solve we The Bernoulli constant provides a useful frame for un- derstanding the setup of our stellar wind boundary con- dition, which we model as a polytropic outflow. It is often common to neglect detailed treatment of energy 28 We note that Eq. (4.31) in the reference is missing a minus sign and should read −∂r log(qr−1/2) > (5/8)∂rM 2 > 0 when evaluated at rc, to be in agreement with both Eq. (4.29) and the discussion following. 30 begin by writing the steady state mass continuity equa- tion as ρur2 = ρ0u0r2 0. (A16) McCann et al. This, combined with the polytropic relationship, Eq. (A11), allows us to write the sound speed in terms of the velocity and radius (cid:115) (cid:19)γ−1 (cid:18) u0r2 0 ur2 cs(r) = γP0 ρ0 . (A17) Combined with Eq. (A13) we have an equation for u in terms of only constants and r (cid:19)γ−1 (cid:18) u0r2 0 ur2 1 2 u2 + γ γ − 1 P0 ρ0 + (φ − bpoly) = 0. (A18) Thus given a mass-loss rate, M = ρur2, and the tem- perature of the outflow at r0, we can analytically solve for the velocity structure of the outflow. This is precisely what we do for our stellar wind, by using Brent's method to solve for u at all locations within the domain. We then take the velocity and use Eqs. (A16) and (A17) to solve for the density and temperature structure of the stellar wind. Note that for future work one should consider instead using what is sometimes called a coronal wind (Lamers & Cassinelli 1999, Ch. 5). We have already derived the solution for the coronal wind in Eq. (A6). Notice that for coronal winds b = bisen − (κ∂rT )/(ρu). Thus, if one has large heat fluxes at the wind base (large −κ∂rT and/or small ρu) it is possible to have bound atmo- sphere (bisen < 0) near the wind base, but be unbound (bisen ≥ 0) further out where heat fluxes have distributed the heat (−κ∂rT ≈ 0). Importantly, this can be accom- plished in simulations with γ = 5/3, meaning that with conduction, transonic stellar winds can be included in simulations that include adiabatically cooled planetary outflows. B. AMBIENT MEDIUM SETUP AND OPTIMIZATION Illustration of radial scales for the nested isentropic Figure 21. atmospheres that comprise our initial conditions for simulations that lack a stellar wind. Blue denotes our reference height for each atmosphere and black is the bounding surface of that atmosphere where the values go to zero. Not to scale. As mentioned in § 2.3.2, an isentropic bound hydro- static atmosphere has a bounding surface at which the density and pressure go to zero. To avoid the difficulty of handling this numerically, our atmospheres are cut off at a numerical edge such that Re < Rz. It is desir- able to chose Re well away from the τ = 1 surface for photoionization, This prevents unnecessary evolution of τ = 1, although the final solution should be insensitive to any such choices. More importantly, the closer Re is to Rz, the lower the pressure and density of the pressure- matched ambient medium can be. We find that setting the Re = Rz − δx/2 produces numerical stability, where δx is the size of a computational cell at the locally high- est level of static mesh refinement. This choice is suc- cessful because as part of the hydrodynamic update we must extrapolate the state variables from cell centers to cell edges. Truncating at Rz − δx/2 ensures that a well- defined solution exists at the cell edge to which we are extrapolating. Note that our stellar wind is also techni- cally an isentropic atmosphere; however, it is unbounded so that it does not have a zero radius, Rz. Therefore, we only consider a reference radius, r(cid:63),0, at which to pre- scribe boundary conditions. B.1. Setup B.2. Optimization When no stellar wind is present, our ambient medium takes the form of two nested isentropic atmospheres, which prevents the background gas from collapsing due to the planet's gravity. Our simulations thus contain up to three nested isentropic atmospheres, pressure-matched at the boundaries where they meet. We enumerate our isentropic atmospheres as follows: "0" corresponds to the planetary atmosphere, "1" to the primary ambi- ent medium and "2" to the secondary ambient medium. Each isentropic atmosphere has a reference radius R0, R1, or R2, a zero radius Rz, where the atmosphere for- mally reaches zero density, and a numerical edge, Re, where the atmosphere is truncated in our simulation. For example, Re,0 refers to the truncation radius for the planetary atmosphere. As the atmospheres are nested and pressure matched, we take the edge of an inner at- mosphere as the reference of the next atmosphere, e.g., R1 = Re,0. These radial scales are illustrated in Fig- ure 21. The numerical difficulties in simulating our ambient medium are twofold. First, for numerical stability, areas with large gradients should be well resolved. To effi- ciently achieve this we need to avoid regions of the isen- tropic ambient medium that have small scale heights, e.g., near their zero radius. The second difficulty comes from pressure matching a low- and high-density region, since the speed of sound in the low density region will be larger. Lowering the ambient density then in turn, leads to exceedingly expensive computations as we must satisfy the Courant condition. When trying to optimize our simulations, the limita- tions placed by these two constraints turn out to be at odds with one another. Since we must prioritize accu- racy over efficiency, we foremost avoid large gradients in the flow, and we will treat the sound speed as a sec- ondary optimization to consider only if we can ensure small gradients. Why these constraints are at odds with one another is intuitively understood by considering the 31 atmosphere's temperature. A hotter atmosphere has a larger sound speed, which by the Courant condition re- quires higher temporal resolution. Conversely a colder atmosphere has smaller scale heights that requires higher spatial resolution to resolve. As the density is related to the temperature by the equation of state, we will now ex- amine the bounds these constraints place on our ambient density. As already stated, the first difficulty (large gradients) is averted by avoiding the edge of the ambient atmosphere. From Eq. (24) we know Rz,1 occurs where φ(Rz,1) = h1 + φ1. To avoid a "snowplow" phase as our planetary wind launches, we wish to reduce the reference density of the ambient medium, ρ1, relative to that of the edge of the planetary atmosphere, ρ(Re,0). Then, as the ambient medium and planetary atmosphere are pressure matched (P1 = P (Re,0)), h1 > h(Re,0) and thus Rz,1 > Rz,0 (see Footnote 10 for detailed proof). However, rather than setting ρ1 and solving for Rz,1, we instead solve for ρ1 after choosing Rz,1. Operationally we chose the Rz,1 to either be outside of our domain or at some special radius, as discussed below. To bound ρ1, consider a potential such that φ(r) ≥ φ1 for r > R1. This happens for a point mass or, in the full rotating reference frame, inside the Roche lobe. To ensure that the density does not go to zero inside Re,1, we require φ(Re,1) > φ(Rz,1), or ρ1 ≤ γP1 (γ − 1) (φ(Re,1) − φ1) . (B1) For the lower bound, it turns out that inside our isen- tropic planetary atmosphere the largest sound speed is found in the inner masked region. Therefore, we seek an ambient medium that at most has this speed of sound to add no further computational expense. Using the Courant condition to keep the adiabatic sound speed be- low that of the masked region, the ambient gas density should satisfy ρ1 ≥ ρmask P1 Pmask . (B2) Here the "mask" subscript is the value inside Rmask. Combining Eqs. (B1) and (B2) provides upper and lower constraints on our ambient density ρmask P1 Pmask ≤ ρ1 ≤ γP1 (γ − 1) (φ(Rz,1) − φ1) . (B3) Ideally, one should chose the lowest density possible to avoid causing the wind to enter a "snowplow" phase when expanding. Yet, there is no guarantee that these constraints are consistent, and as mentioned we must fa- vor satisfying Eq. (B1). If these constraints turn out to be inconsistent then there is additional computational expense in our ambient medium over the planetary at- mosphere. However, since we are using structured static mesh refinement we can further exploit the larger cell sizes in the lower resolution regions to perhaps make in- consistent bounds consistent, or at the very least "less" inconsistent. Let the cell size ratio between the coarsest and finest resolution be f . By the Courant condition on the coarser 32 McCann et al. mesh we can have a factor of f larger sound speed com- pared to the fine resolution mesh, which translates into a factor of f 2 lower density. Therefore, if we extend our first ambient medium layer out only to the coarse refine- √ ment, e.g., if it is given by a cube of side 2Rrefine then 3Rrefine, we can use a factor of f 2 smaller density here while satisfying the Courant conditions with the same time step. Then from there a second ambient medium layer would extend out to infinity, Rz,2 → ∞, so that φ(Rz,2) = 0. Then the constraints on our secondary am- bient medium layer become (cid:18) (cid:19) 1 f 2 ρmask P2 Pmask ≤ ρ2 ≤ γP2 (γ − 1) (−φ2) . (B4) √ Here the subscript "2" denotes the second ambient layer's reference point, which is at 3Rrefine = Rz,1. There is still no guarantee that these conditions are con- sistent. However, by exploiting the refinement factor and using multiple ambient layers one can optimize their initial setup relative to a single ambient layer. This is only appropriate when lower resolution does not lead to numerical instability or loss of numerical convergence. We therefore need the scale height of our wind to be larger than our isentropic hydrostatic atmosphere, which is what we find. C. SCALE HEIGHTS WITHIN THE ATMOSPHERE We will now review four distinct definitions of a scale height and explore their uses. For simplicity we will work with a generic variable X in a spherically symmetric at- mosphere. Often the first scale height one encounters, and perhaps the best defined, is the isothermal scale height, Hiso = kBT /(µg). It is derived from the plane- parallel, isothermal atmosphere, for which the thermo- dynamic variables are of the form X(z) = X0 exp(−(z − z0)/Hiso). Thus, for each Hiso away from z0, the ther- modynamic variables have an e -- folding in value. The second way in which we will define a scale height is an often-used order of magnitude definition that can be thought of as the natural extension of isothermal scale height (cid:18) (cid:19)−1 H(cid:48) = − d log(X) . dr (C1) Solving this differential equation for constant H(cid:48) re- trieves the isothermal atmosphere. However, this def- inition is often used even when the atmosphere is not an exponential, i.e., H(cid:48) is not constant. For example, we have used this definition for our length scale in our Knud- sen number calculation, (L = (∇ log P )−1). That is be- cause it roughly encapsulates the scale on which the vari- ables change the order of themselves (H(cid:48) ∼ (X/∆X)∆r). When one integrates Eq. (C1), it counts the number of e -- foldings between two locations, (cid:90) b (cid:18) X(b) (cid:19) Ne(a, b) = − H(cid:48)−1dr = log (C2) but what does H(cid:48)(r) itself mean in an atmosphere that is not an isothermal plane-parallel atmosphere? One will find that in general it is not the distance from r at which X(a) a , variables have e -- folded. Instead it describes the e -- folding length in the analogous isothermal plane -- parallel atmo- sphere that has the same conditions at r as our atmo- sphere. If we want the scale height, H(r), over which the atmosphere folds by a factor of s, we need to solve X(r + H(r)) = sX(r). (C3) This is usually what we mean when we talk about a scale height in our isentropic atmospheres, since it is useful to determine the actual folding within a numer- ical cell to quantify a condition for numerical stability. Even for a spherically symmetric isothermal atmosphere the form is not simple; however, both the isothermal and polytropic spherically symmetric cases have closed forms. For polytropic atmospheres all thermodynamic variables are a power, n, of an underlaying function f (r), i.e., X(r) = X0f (r)n, e.g., n = 1/(γ − 1) for density, n = γ/(γ − 1) for pressure, and n = 1 for temperature. Then for the corresponding variable to the index n, the scale height H(r) has a s-folding after Hn(r, s) = Rz − r r + Rz(s−n−1 − 1)−1 r, (C4) where Rz is the edge of your atmosphere, which for a hy- drostatic isentropic atmosphere in a point mass potential is given by (cid:32) (cid:33)−1 Rz = − 1 R0 γc2 s,0 (γ − 1)GMp . (C5) The last way which we define a scale height only applies for atmospheres that tend to zero in the limit of infinity. It is defined as(cid:90) ∞ r X(r(cid:48))dr(cid:48) = X(r)(cid:101)H(r). (C6) Clearly this scale height is undefined in atmospheres that do not vanish at infinity, such as the spherically symmet- ric isothermal atmospheres.29 For a hydrostatic poly- tropic atmosphere, this scale height has a closed form in McCann et al. (cid:18) Rz (cid:19)−3/2(cid:18) terms of incomplete beta functions (cid:19)(cid:19) (cid:101)H(r) = Rz This last scale height, (cid:101)H, is useful since its definition , 1 − n, 1 + n (C7) (cid:18) r − 3π 2 − β − 1 Rz . parallels that of optical depth σ nHI(r(cid:48)) dr(cid:48) = σ nHI(r) (cid:101)H(r). (C8) τ (r) = r (cid:90) ∞ r Therefore, rather than doing a numerical integral to cal- culate the optical depth in our isentropic atmospheres, we only need to calculate the incomplete beta function. We use this calculation when picking an initial number density at Rp (Eq. (30)). This is can be justified by considering where τ = 1 occurs in steady state. From Eq. (C8), one can always pick a nHI(Rp) such that τ = 1 at Rp in steady state. However, the issue is knowing a priori the steady-state (cid:101)H of the outflow. For the energy-limited regime, where the outflow is not strongly ionized and neutrals are replenished by advec- tion rather than recombination, we find that the opti- cal depth one surface does not change substantially from its initial location. We calculate the number density re- quired to place τ = 1 at Rp using Eq. (C7) and Eq. (C8). However, in the radiation-limited regime the assump- tion that the ionization front does not move breaks down. We therefore no longer suggest using Eq. (C8), and instead appeal to the fact that τ = 1 will occur where recombination balances ionization ((1−X)σHIF = αBnHX 2).30 Solving for nH gives σHI F0 1 − X X 2 αB nH = (C9) For the ionization fraction a small value, perhaps X ∼ 0.1 is appropriate, as in the radiation-limited regime the ionization structure will be extremely sharp. The ideal value of X merits future investigation. . Note that, we do not provide a first-order principles method of knowing a priori if you are in the energy- limited or radiation-limited regime, but it suffices to say that from previous studies we knew our parameters would firmly be in the energy-limited regime (Tripathi et al. 2015). three scale heights: H(cid:48), H, and (cid:101)H reduce to Hiso for We conclude by noting, perhaps unsurprisingly, all the plane-parallel isothermal atmospheres. 29 Note that a plane-parallel isothermal atmosphere may extend infinity far out, but it tends to zero in the limit, so it is well defined there. 30 This is not true in the energy-limited as advection primarily balances ionization. 33
1712.05154	2	1712	2017-12-15T10:40:39	On the impact origin of Phobos and Deimos III: resulting composition from different impactors	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The origin of Phobos and Deimos in a giant impact generated disk is gaining larger attention. Although this scenario has been the subject of many studies, an evaluation of the chemical composition of the Mars' moons in this framework is missing. The chemical composition of Phobos and Deimos is unconstrained. The large uncertainty about the origin of the mid-infrared features, the lack of absorption bands in the visible and near-infrared spectra, and the effects of secondary processes on the moons' surface make the determination of their composition very difficult from remote sensing data. Simulations suggest a formation of a disk made of gas and melt with their composition linked to the nature of the impactor and Mars. Using thermodynamic equilibrium we investigate the composition of dust (condensates from gas) and solids (from a cooling melt) that result from different types of Mars impactors (Mars-, CI-, CV-, EH-, comet-like). Our calculations show a wide range of possible chemical compositions and noticeable differences between dust and solids depending on the considered impactors. Assuming Phobos and Deimos as result of the accretion and mixing of dust and solids, we find that the derived assemblage (dust rich in metallic-iron, sulphides and/or carbon, and quenched solids rich in silicates) can be compatible with the observations. The JAXA's MMX (Martian Moons eXploration) mission will investigate the physical and chemical properties of the Maroons, especially sampling from Phobos, before returning to Earth. Our results could be then used to disentangle the origin and chemical composition of the pristine body that hit Mars and suggest guidelines for helping in the analysis of the returned samples.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version December 18, 2017 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX61 ON THE IMPACT ORIGIN OF PHOBOS AND DEIMOS III: RESULTING COMPOSITION FROM DIFFERENT IMPACTORS Francesco C. Pignatale,1 S´ebastien Charnoz,1, 2 Pascal Rosenblatt,3, 4 Ryuki Hyodo,5 Tomoki Nakamura,6 and Hidenori Genda5 1Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP), 1 rue Jussieu, 75005, Paris, France 2Institut de Physique du Globe/Universite Paris Diderot/CEA/CNRS, 75005 Paris, France 3Royal Observatory of Belgium, Avenue circulaire 3, B-1180 Uccle, Belgium 4now at ACRI-ST, 260 route du pin-montard- BP 234- F-06904 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex, France 5Earth-Life Science Institute/Tokyo Institute of Technology, 152-8550 Tokyo, Japan 6Tohoku University, 980-8578 Miyagi, Japan (Accepted for publication in ApJ) ABSTRACT The origin of Phobos and Deimos in a giant impact generated disk is gaining larger attention. Although this scenario has been the subject of many studies, an evaluation of the chemical composition of the Mars' moons in this framework is missing. The chemical composition of Phobos and Deimos is unconstrained. The large uncertainness about the origin of the mid-infrared features, the lack of absorption bands in the visible and near-infrared spectra, and the effects of secondary processes on the moons' surface make the determination of their composition very difficult from remote sensing data. Simulations suggest a formation of a disk made of gas and melt with their composition linked to the nature of the impactor and Mars. Using thermodynamic equilibrium we investigate the composition of dust (condensates from gas) and solids (from a cooling melt) that result from different types of Mars impactors (Mars-, CI-, CV-, EH-, comet-like). Our calculations show a wide range of possible chemical compositions and noticeable differences between dust and solids depending on the considered impactors. Assuming Phobos and Deimos as result of the accretion and mixing of dust and solids, we find that the derived assemblage (dust rich in metallic-iron, sulphides and/or carbon, and quenched solids rich in silicates) can be compatible with the observations. The JAXA's MMX (Martian Moons exploration) mission will investigate the physical and chemical properties of the Maroons, especially sampling from Phobos, before returning to Earth. Our results could be then used to disentangle the origin and chemical composition of the pristine body that hit Mars and suggest guidelines for helping in the analysis of the returned samples. Keywords: planets and satellites: composition, planets and satellites: formation, planets and satellites: individual (Phobos, Deimos) 7 1 0 2 c e D 5 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 4 5 1 5 0 . 2 1 7 1 : v i X r a Corresponding author: Francesco C. Pignatale [email protected] 2 Pignatale et al. 1. INTRODUCTION The history of formation of the Mars' moons Phobos and Deimos is still an open question. It has been the subject of several studies which point to a capture origin, in-situ or impact generated formation (Rosenblatt 2011; Citron et al. 2015; Rosenblatt et al. 2016, and references therein). Accretion within an impact-generated disk scenario (Craddock 2011; Rosenblatt et al. 2016) is gaining more support as it can explains several properties of the Mars' moons such as the mass and the orbital parameters (Rosenblatt et al. 2016; Hesselbrock & Minton 2017; Hyodo et al. 2017a,b). Phobos has a very peculiar infrared spectra. Although mid-infrared (MIDIR) show different features, the visibile (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) spectra are characterized by a lack of absorption features (Murchie 1999; Giuranna et al. 2011; Rosenblatt 2011; Murchie et al. 2015). Murchie (1999) isolated two main regions named "red" and "blue" on the Phobos' surface that have different spectral characteristics which can be best matched by D- and T-type asteroids respectively (Murchie et al. 1991; Murchie 1999; Rivkin et al. 2002). Giuranna et al. (2011) presented a detailed investigation on the possible chemistry of Phobos' surface. They found that the "blue" region can be fitted with a phyllosilicates-rich material, while the "red" region has a best fit when tectosilicates, mainly feldspar, are included in the model. Moreover they found that no class of chondritic material can match the observed spectra. Nevertheless, they pointed out that different more complex mixtures of dust could be able to reproduce the observed trends. The featureless VIS-NIR spectra are often associated with a strong space weathering (Murchie 1999; Rosenblatt 2011). However, Giuranna et al. (2011) following the spectroscopical studies of Singer (1981), Salisbury & Walter (1989),Cloutis et al. (1990a), Cloutis et al. (1990b), Cloutis et al. (1990c), Cloutis et al. (1990d), Burns (1993), Klima et al. (2007) list a series of possible mechanisms that can reduce the strength of the spectra and match the observation: i) as the 1-2µm feature arise from iron-bearing material such as pyroxene and olivine, the absence of those compounds may reduce the spectra; ii) a mixture of opaque material such as metallic iron, iron oxides and amorphous carbon mixed with olivine and pyroxene can reduce dramatically the VIS/NIR bands; iii) solids which results from quenching from the liquids state may have their reflectance properties reduced as they lack of perfect crystalline structure; iv) the reflectance of fine-grain materials decreases as the size of the grains decreases. Hyodo et al. (2017a) presented detailed Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations in which they deter- mined the dynamical, physical and thermodynamical properties of an impact-generated disk. They found that the material that populate the disk is initially a mixture of gas (∼ 5%) and melts (∼ 95%). These information together with the Martian composition and hypothesis on the impactors, can be used for modelling the building blocks of Phobos and Deimos. In this work we present a study of the bulk composition of the Mars's moons following the giant-impact scenario. Our aim is to provide more clues on the origin of the moons, their chemical composition, infrared spectra, and the nature of the impactor itself. Furthermore, the JAXA's MMX1 mission plans to observe Phobos and Deimos in detail, and return samples (at least 10g) from the surface of Phobos. Our results could be then used as guidelines for helping in their analysis and interpretation. Starting from different initial compositions of the impactor (from mars-like to chondritic-like), we compute thermo- dynamic equilibrium (DeHoff 1993) to solve for stable phases that may condense from the gas in the impact-generated disk. Additionally, we compute the composition of the cooling melt to investigate how it will eventually differs from condensates. The resulting condensates and solidified melt are then taken as proxies for the building block of Phobos and Deimos and further discussion are made. In this work we will mainly focus on Phobos, as more observation are available and as it will be the main sampling target of the JAXAs MMX mission. Nevertheless, the formation of Deimos follows the same proposed scenario. The paper is structured as follow: in section 2 we describe the techniques and the model we use in our calculations. In section 3 we present our results that will be discussed in section 4. Conclusions are summarized in section 5. Hyodo et al. (2017a) calculated that the temperature in the Mars' moons forming region of the disk reaches T ∼ 2000 K just after the impact. The value of P ∼ 10−4 bar is chosen as our fiducial pressure as it is, for the given temperature, the average saturation pressure for several mixtures calculated in Visscher & Fegley (2013) and the average pressure in the disk profile in Ronnet et al. (2016) and Hyodo et al. (2017a) where gas and melt coexist. 2. MODEL AND METHODS 1 http://mmx.isas.jaxa.jp/en/index.html AASTEX Dust composition from impactors 3 Figure 1. This cartoon describes the considered scenario. After the impact, part of Mars material will be ejected out at high temperature and will vaporize into gas as well as part of the impactor. The gas mixture will then condense into dust. On the other hand, the not vaporized material from Mars and the impactor will form a melt and then solidify. Phobos and Deimos will be the result of the accretion of these two components. The yellow region represents the part of disk within the Roche limit (Hyodo et al. 2017a). Under these conditions the material in the disk that comes from Mars and from the impactor will result in a mixture composed of gas and melt (Hyodo et al. 2017a). Hyodo et al. (2017a) showed that the building blocks of Phobos and Deimos would be composed of a mixture of about half-martian material and half-impactor material. We, thus, assume that the gas is made of a well mixed two-components: the gas that is released by heating up Mars-material plus the gas that is released by heating up impactor-material. We then assume that the melt is a mixture of the not vaporized material from the two bodies (Hyodo et al. 2017a). Figure 1 shows a cartoon of the proposed model. As the disk cools down, the gas will eventually re-condense and the melt will solidify. In this work, we define, for ease of understanding, dust as the condensates from the gas phase and solids as the material that result from the solidification of the melt. In order to determine the composition of the dust that will condense from the gas phase we assume thermodynamic equilibrium (DeHoff 1993): at constant temperature and pressure, the stability of a system is determined by its Gibbs free energy, and, in fact, by the composition which minimizes the potential of the system. Although it is an approximation, thermodynamic equilibrium is a powerful tool to understand the evolution of the chemical composition of complex systems. This technique has been extensively used in the study of the chemistry of gas and dust in several astrophysical environments: from the Solar Nebula, meteorites and protoplanetary disks (Larimer 1979; Yoneda & Grossman 1995; Lodders 2003; Ebel 2006; Pignatale et al. 2016) to stars dusty envelopes (Gail & Sedlmayr 1999; Lodders & Fegley 1997; Ebel & Grossman 2001) and exoplanets composition (Bond et al. 2010). 4 Pignatale et al. To compute the thermodynamic equilibrium we use the HSC software package (version 8) (Roine 2002), which includes the Gibbs free energy minimisation method of White et al. (1958). Thermodynamic data for each compound are taken from the database provided by HSC (Roine 2002, and references therein). HSC has been widely used in material science and it has been already tested in astrophysics showing very good reliability in predicting the composition of different systems (Pasek et al. 2005; Pignatale et al. 2011; Bond et al. 2010; Madhusudhan et al. 2012). To calculate the composition of the solids from the cooling melts we use the normative mineralogy (CIPW-norm) (Cross et al. 1902) and the work of Ronnet et al. (2016) as benchmark. CIPW-norm is one of the most used technique to determine, in a first approximation, the equilibrium composition of a multicomponent melt (Cross et al. 1902). (Hyodo et al. 2017a) showed that the melt phase of Mars and the impactor will likely never completely equilibrate between each other. Mars-only and impactor-only melt with different degrees of equilibration in between are indeed expected. Nevertheless, calculating the resulting compositions of a equilibrated melt represents a first interesting add- on to investigate the differences that condensation and solidification would bring to the final Phobos bulk composition. Moreover, our model suggests that the MMX may be confronted with two distinguishable family of material, the dust and the solids. As a consequence, this investigation can bring further information and clues that can be used in the MMX samples analysis. During the planet formation, Mars and the other inner rocky planets experienced impacts with other bodies. The impact histories strongly depend on the timing and location of the planets (Brasser et al. 2017; Raymond & Izidoro 2017; Brasser & Mojzsis 2017; Bottke & Andrews-Hanna 2017). The nature of the impactors is unconstrained as the dynamical interactions of Jupiter and Saturn with the surrounding minor bodies may have scattered and delivered in the inner Solar System material of different nature and of chondritic origin (Raymond & Izidoro 2017; Brasser & Mojzsis 2017; Bottke & Andrews-Hanna 2017). Our aim is to determine the changes that different impactors would bring in the chemical composition of Phobos, and if these differences can be traceable. In order to keep our selection as chemically heterogeneous as possible we, thus, consider the following types of impactor: Marstype, CVtype, EHtype, CItype, comettype. As a proxy of Mars composition we take the Bulk-Silicates-Mars (BSM) from Visscher & Fegley (2013). Compositions for the EH, CV and CI chondrites are taken from Wasson & Kallemeyn (1988). Elemental composition for the comet is taken from Huebner & Boice (1997). Table 1 shows the elemental distribution for all considered impactors. In order to help to understand the differences between the impactors we also report several elemental ratios such as the Mg/Si, Fe/O, C/O ratios. These ratios play an important role in determining the resulting chemical composition of a mixture. This will be discussed in section 4. We also report values from the Sun photosphere2 as reference (Asplund et al. 2009). Note the H/O ratio of the solar nebula (Sun) and the abundances of other elements relatives to O and C. Looking at table 1, we can already notice that we will deal with wide different environments. Moreover, the relative abundances between elements clearly indicate that our systems will return chemical distributions that are far from that one predicted for a solar composition. The 13 considered elements in Table 1 can form ∼6800 possible compounds, including complex organics, gas and solids (and excluding liquids). Most of these compounds are not stable at our chosen T and P . We derive our fiducial list of compounds starting from the list reported in Visscher & Fegley (2013) and the set of compounds in Pignatale et al. (2011). Complex organics have been excluded from calculations as their chemistry is driven more by kinetics rather than thermodynamic equilibrium. C-graphite is taken as representative of the main carbon condensates together with Fe3C, Fe2C and SiC. Calcium and aluminium refractory species, all main oxides and main silicates (Mg and Fe silicates) have been taken into account. Sulfides are included as well as water-vapour and water-ice. We report the complete list of considered species in Table 2. The following nomenclature will be used: olivine (forsterite, Mg2SiO4, and fayalite, Fe2SiO4), pyroxene (enstatite, MgSiO3, and ferrosilite, FeSiO3), plagioclase (anorthite, CaAl2Si2O8 and albite, NaAlSi3O8), melilite (gehlenite, Ca2Al2SiO7, and akermanite, Ca2MgSi2O7), fassaite (Ca-Tschermak, CaAl2SiO6, and diopside, CaMgSi2O6), spinel (MgAl2O4 and FeAl2O4), magnesiowustite (MgO and FeO), sulfide (FeS, MgS and CaS), metal (Fe, Al and Zn). Only the endmembers of each solids solution are considered and no predictions of intermediate compositions are made. To summarize, we calculate the thermodynamic equilibrium for each of the considered cases in table 1 at the given temperature (T = 2000 K) and pressure (P = 10−4 bar). The resulting gas phase of Mars plus the gas phase of the selected impactor will constitute the gas mixture from which the dust will condense. The material that is not in the 2 We take the elemental abundances from Asplund et al. (2009) for the given set of elements. Please note that He is not included in the system and, as a consequence, the abundance of H raises to ∼99% of the total. AASTEX Dust composition from impactors 5 Table 1. Elemental abundances (mol%) for single impactors. Abundances of the solar photosphere (Sun) are also shown. Mars CV CI EH comet Sun Element Abundances (mol%) Al C Ca Fe H K Mg Na O S Si Ti Zn 1.250E+00 1.356E+00 4.668E-01 7.596E-01 7.000E-02 2.82E-04 0.000E+00 9.747E-01 3.902E+00 8.427E-01 1.137E+01 2.69E-02 9.300E-01 9.911E-01 3.362E-01 5.367E-01 6.000E-02 2.19E-04 5.440E+00 8.797E+00 4.773E+00 1.314E+01 5.200E-01 3.16E-03 0.000E+00 5.808E+00 2.906E+01 0.000E+00 5.464E+01 99.9 4.800E-02 1.658E-02 2.098E-02 5.177E-02 0.000E+00 1.07E-05 1.632E+01 1.247E+01 5.845E+00 1.104E+01 9.900E-01 3.98E-03 7.000E-01 3.001E-01 3.121E-01 7.484E-01 1.000E-01 1.74E-04 5.815E+01 5.157E+01 4.491E+01 4.724E+01 2.834E+01 4.89E-02 0.000E+00 1.434E+00 2.695E+00 4.577E+00 7.100E-01 1.32E-03 1.673E+01 1.624E+01 7.656E+00 2.104E+01 1.830E+00 3.23E-03 4.000E-02 4.280E-02 1.285E-02 2.379E-02 0.000E+00 8.90E-06 2.000E-04 3.709E-03 6.988E-03 9.674E-03 0.000E+00 3.63E-06 Mg/Si Fe/O Fe/Si (Fe+Si)/O C/O H/O 0.98 0.09 0.33 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.17 0.54 0.49 0.02 0.11 0.76 0.11 0.62 0.28 0.09 0.65 0.52 0.28 0.62 0.72 0.02 0.00 0.54 0.02 0.28 0.08 0.40 1.93 1.25 0.06 0.98 0.13 0.54 2041 gas phase will form the melt from which the solids will form. To derive the dust composition we then proceed to the computation of the condensation sequence in the interval of temperatures of 150 < T (K) < 2000 with a constant pressure of P = 10−4 bar. To derive the solids composition we compute the CIPW-norm. In order to test our thermodynamic model we also run equilibrium calculation using the solar abundances in Table 1 and compare the results with previous calculations available in the literature. Results of the test and a brief discussion are presented in Appendix A. 3. RESULTS Table 3 shows the elemental abundances (mol%) of the gas mixture that results from equilibrium calculation at T = 2000 K and P = 10−4 bar of Mars plus the considered impactor (Mars+Mars, Mars+CV, Mars+CI, Mars+EH, Mars+comet). These abundances are used as input to compute the condensation sequence. Table 4 show the oxides budget of different melt mixtures in case of complete equilibration between Mars and given impactors. These budgets are used to compute the CIPW-norm. 3.1. Dust from condensing gas Figure 2 shows the dust distribution for all the considered impactors in mol% (being 100 gas+dust) as a function of temperature. From left to right and from top to bottom, the different cases are ordered with decreasing Fe/O ratio of the initial gas mixture (see Table 3). Mars+CV impact results in large quantities of metallic iron, FeS and SiO2. Small amount of pyroxene (enstatite (MgSiO3) and ferrosilite (FeSiO3)), ∼ 1 mol%, is distributed all along the temperature range. At T ∼ 700 K, we see the appearance of Fe2C and C (graphite). Similarly to Mars+CV, the Mars+EH impact shows large quantities of metallic iron, FeS and SiO2. Moreover, we do see small percentage of Si, MgS and SiC. Traces of pyroxenes are seen at high temperatures only. 6 Pignatale et al. Table 2. Complete list of gas and dust species in the equilibrium calculations. Gas Al(g) Al2O2(g) Al2O3(g) AlO(g) AlO2(g) C(g) Ca(g) CaO(g) CH4(g) CO(g) Fe Fe(g) FeO(g) FeS(g) H(g) H2(g) H2O(g) H2S(g) HS(g) K(g) K2(g) K2O(g) KO(g) Mg(g) MgO(g) Na(g) Na2(g) Na2O(g) NaO(g) O(g) O2(g) OH(g) S(g) Si(g) SiO(g) SiO2(g) Ti(g) TiO(g) TiO2(g) Zn(g) ZnO(g) Dust Al2O3 C Ca2Al2SiO7 Ca2MgSi2O7 Ca2SiO4 CaAl12O19 CaAl2O4 CaAl2Si2O8 CaAl2SiO6 CaAl4O7 CaMgSi2O6 CaO CaS CaSiO3 CaTiSiO5 Fe Fe2C Fe2O3 Fe2SiO4 Fe3C Fe3O4 FeAl2O4 FeO FeSiO3 FeTiO3 H2O K K2O K2Si4O9 KAlSi2O6 KAlSi3O8 KAlSiO4 Mg2Al4Si5O18 Mg2SiO4 Mg2TiO4 MgAl2O4 MgO MgS MgSiO3 MgTi2O5 MgTiO3 Na2O Na2SiO3 NaAlSi3O8 Si SiC SiO2 TiO2 Zn Zn2SiO4 Zn2TiO4 ZnO ZnSiO3 The Mars+Mars impact produces several oxides such as FeO, Fe3O4, metallic iron and volatiles such as Na2O, Na2SiO3. Traces of olivine (forsterite (Mg2SiO4) and fayalite (Fe2SiO4)) are present at high temperature. Mars+CI impact returns iron-rich olivine such as fayalite (Fe2SiO4), then FeO, Fe3O4, Fe2O3, FeS and smaller amount of SiO2. At lower temperature we see the condensation of C and H2O. The dust from Mars+comet impact is mainly made of pyroxene, SiO2 and FeS. Mars+comet impact is that one that produces, as expected, a large amount of water ice together with solid carbon. Figure 3 shows the condensation sequence for the more volatiles species. All the considered cases return a very similar behaviour as these volatiles are less effected by the changes of other elemental ratios. Na(g) has higher condensation temperature than K(g) and Z(g) is the last one to condense. Na2SiO3, K2Si4O9 and Zn2SiO4 are the main respective condensates, together with Zn in case of Mars+CV, Mars+EH, and Zn and K for Mars+Mars. 3.2. Solids from cooling melts Table 5 reports the resulting CIPW-norm if complete equilibration between the melt belonging to Mars and to the impactor occurs (see Table 4). To establish the reliability of our CIPW-algorithm, we performed calculation using the BSM and compare our result with that in Ronnet et al. (2016) finding a very good agreement (see the last two columns in Table 5). AASTEX Dust composition from impactors 7 Table 3. Elemental abundances (mol%) of the gas mixture which is released after the impact assuming T = 2000 K, P = 10−4 bar, different types of impactors, and equal contribution between Mars and the considered impactor. Gas mixture +Mars +CV +CI +EH +comet Element Abundances (mol%) Al C Ca Fe H K Mg Na O S Si Ti Zn 8.059E-06 1.382E-05 5.058E-06 2.336E-05 1.412E-05 0.000E+00 3.762E+00 5.791E+00 2.060E+00 1.141E+01 2.348E-05 4.508E-05 9.962E-06 8.897E-05 1.804E-04 1.974E+01 2.972E+01 6.652E+00 3.117E+01 8.041E-01 0.000E+00 2.241E+01 4.314E+01 0.000E+00 5.481E+01 3.360E+00 2.489E-01 1.008E-01 2.423E-01 4.808E-02 3.539E-01 4.512E-01 1.000E-01 8.458E-01 9.982E-01 4.905E+01 3.859E+00 1.502E+00 3.543E+00 8.026E-01 2.608E+01 2.501E+01 3.695E+01 2.775E+01 2.858E+01 0.000E+00 5.519E+00 4.000E+00 1.120E+01 7.121E-01 1.146E+00 8.663E+00 1.735E+00 2.310E+01 1.825E+00 2.663E-01 3.370E-01 2.347E-02 6.733E-02 3.844E-03 1.051E-02 1.505E-02 1.158E-02 2.398E-02 2.007E-04 Mg/Si Fe/O Fe/Si (Fe+Si)/O C/O H/O 0.31 0.76 17.23 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.05 1.19 3.43 1.53 0.15 0.90 0.06 0.18 3.83 0.23 0.16 1.17 0.04 1.12 1.35 1.96 0.07 0.00 0.55 0.03 0.44 0.09 0.40 1.92 Table 4. Oxide composition (wt%) of the melt that results after the impact assuming T = 2000 K, P = 10−4 bar and different types of impactor. Total equilibration between Mars and impactor is also assumed. The Mg/Si and Fe/O ratios are the elemental mole ratios. +Mars +CV +CI +EH +comet Al2O3 CO2 CaO FeO H2O K2O MgO Na2O SiO2 TiO2 ZnO SO3 Mg/Si Fe/O 2.96 0.00 2.40 3.55 0.00 2.87 3.06 0.00 2.47 3.02 0.00 2.41 3.10 0.00 0.28 17.16 12.55 14.42 12.35 17.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.60 30.88 31.15 32.04 31.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.75 49.35 48.80 50.10 45.11 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.09 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.06 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.06 3.37 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.09 8 Pignatale et al. Figure 2. Condensation sequences for major dust species (mol%) that result from the gas mixtures in Table 3. Note the changes of colours when different compounds are considered. AASTEX Dust composition from impactors 9 Figure 3. Condensation sequences for K, Zn, and Na compounds (mol%) that result from the gas mixtures in Table 3. Sodium compounds for Mars+Mars were included in Fig. 2 as, in that case, they represent major species. Note the changes of scales in the y-axis. 10 Pignatale et al. Table 5. Resulting CIPW-norm of the melt phase. Calculations for the BSM are also performed to compare the resulting CIWP-norm with values derived by Ronnet et al. (2016). +Mars +CV +EH +CI +COMET BSM BSM (Ronnet et al. 2016) Anorthite Diopside 8.08 3.08 9.69 3.63 8.24 2.97 8.35 3.13 1.39 0.00 3.16 6.89 Pyroxene 43.41 55.48 57.58 52.35 54.97 21.03 Albite Orthoclase Olivine Ilmenite Corundum Anorth+Alb Oli/Pyr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.29 0.65 45.19 29.68 31.05 35.98 34.66 58.50 0.25 0.00 0.00 1.04 1.52 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.68 6.40 2.59 0.00 0.63 0.27 0.00 (11.45) 2.78 6.97 21.29 0.66 59.22 0.00 0.00 11.59 2.78 The resulting solids will be generally characterized by pyroxene3 and olivine, with the former in larger abundances, except for the Mars+Mars case for which olivine is slightly more abundant. Although our selected impactors have initially different chemical composition, the resulting CIPW-norm is quite similar for all cases. It is interesting to note that diposide (CaMgSi2O6) is not predicted for a cometary impactor, while corundum (Al2O3) is a tracer of that impact. Enstatite and forsterite will be largely stable and common compounds for all the considered cases. Albite (NaAlSi3O8) and orthoclase (KAlSi3O8) are not present in the solids because Na and K are totally vaporized after the impact (see Tables 3 and 4). 4. DISCUSSION 4.1. Dust composition Our calculations clearly show different behaviour when compared with the classical condensation sequence with a solar composition (see Fig. 5). One of the main reasons is the amount of H, C and O in our systems that is very different from the solar values. Moreover, in our calculations the amount of Fe, Mg, and Si is of the same order of magnitude as O. This is not the case for the Solar Nebula where H is predominant, C is comparable with O and Fe, Mg, Si are orders of magnitude smaller than O (Asplund et al. 2009). Here we try to qualitatively understand our results and emphasize the differences from the well known condensation sequence of the Solar Nebula. The stability of forsterite (Mg2SiO4) and enstatite (MgSiO3) is driven by the Mg/Si ratio where higher Mg/Si ratios (> 1) favour forsterite while lower Mg/Si ratios (< 1) favour enstatite (Ferrarotti & Gail 2001). However, at very high temperature, forsterite can still be the first magnesium silicates that condenses out before being converted in enstatite (Ferrarotti & Gail 2001). From Table 3 we see that the Mg/Si is well below 1 in all cases and, as expected the dust is generally enstatite-rich (see Fig. 2). The excess of Si that is not consumed in the magnesio-silicates will then be bound with O to form stable SiO2. Generally SiO2 tends to be more stable than iron-oxides (see for example ellingham diagrams in DeHoff (1993)). Fe and SiO2 can then react to form iron-rich silicates. If oxygen is still available for reaction it will start to bind iron to form iron-oxides. If there is lack of oxygen, iron will be mainly in the metallic form. The presence of sulfur further modifies the expected composition as sulfidation of Fe occurs. As a consequence, looking at the elemental ratios reported in Table 3 the behaviours found in Fig. 2 become clearer. Let us consider the two extreme cases of the Fe/O ratio, Mars+comet (Fe/O=0.03) and Mars+CV (Fe/O=1.19). In the case of Mars+comet we have Mg/Si=0.55. As such we expect the oxygen to form mainly enstatite MgSiO3. Then we expect the appearance of SiO2 as there is Si in excess with Si more abundant than Fe (Fe/Si=0.44). As Fe/O=0.03 and (Fe+Si)/O=0.09, there is a large reservoir of oxygen to oxidise the iron which, indeed, is found in ferrosilite FeSiO3. 3 hypersthene in Ronnet et al. (2016). AASTEX Dust composition from impactors 11 On the other hand, let us focus to the Mars+CV case. Here the small amount of Mg will form magnesium-silicates, then the excess of Si will form SiO2 and FeSiO3. The Fe/Si=3.43 tells us that there is iron in excess compared to Si. The Fe/O=1.19 and (Fe+Si)/O=1.53 also tell us that there is not enough oxygen available to oxidise all the iron. As a consequence, we expect to see a certain amount of iron to be stable in its metallic form, and FeS given the presence of sulfure in the mixture. Sulfur is also present in the case for Mars+EH, Mars+CI and Mars+Comet. If large amount of sulfur is available, as in the the Mars+EH impact, MgS also becomes a stable sulfide. Interesting cases are also the Mars+Mars and Mars+CI. Here, the high Fe/Si ratios but low Fe/O ratios return large amount of several iron oxides: there is no enough Si to form large amount of iron-silicates, thus the O binds directly the iron in several iron-oxides. The Mars+EH impact clearly shows the effect of the sulfide-rich impactor given the presence of MgS together with FeS. Our calculations show that different impactors result in dust with traceable different composition. This open the possibility to identify the individual composition of the impactor from the determination of the dust composition of Phobos and from the samples collected by the MMX mission. In conclusion, dust from different bodies will be characterized by different i) degrees of iron-oxidation, ii) presence of iron-silicates and/or iron-oxides, iii) amount of sulfides, iv) amount of carbon and ice. All the condensation sequences return a generally poor content of olivine and pyroxene, with a preference of the latter. A qualitative analysis of different elemental ratios can then be useful to derive the chemistry of impactors that are not considered in this work. 4.1.1. Carbon, water ice and other volatiles In our calculations we see the appearance of solid C in the case of Mars+CV, Mars+CI and Mars+comet, while SiC is the most stable C-bearing compound in the case of Mars+EH . Mars+CV, Mars+CI and Mars+comet have carbon and hydrogen in the gas mixture, while in the Mars+EH case there is carbon only. The carbon-to-oxygen ratio (C/O) is an important parameter that determines the presence of solid carbon, water vapour and other oxides. At high temperature CO(g) will consume all the C available before allowing the formation of water vapour (Larimer 1975). This has strong implication in the formation of complex organics and water (if hydrogen is present in the system). The chemistry of carbon cannot be totally determined by thermodynamic equilibrium. The behaviour of CO(g) in a H2O(g)-H2(g) gas in the temperature range of 100 < T (K) < 700 K is ruled by kinetics and the environmental condition. The classical transition around T ∼ 700 K where CO(g) is transformed in CH4 can be described, for (cid:10) CnH2n+2 + nH2O. This can be noticed in Fig.5(right) where example, by a reaction of the type nCO + (1 + 2n)H2 n = 1 and the reaction is CO(g) + 3H2(g) (cid:10) CH4(g) + H2O(g). In fact, this reaction is just a first simplified transcription of the many Fischer-Tropsh-like reactions that can occur in this temperature range and at different H2/CO ratios (Sekine et al. 2006; Nuth et al. 2008). Fischer-Tropsh processes produce complex organics on the surface of dusty grains in the presence of the right catalyst. There are different catalysts with their own properties, but usually, in astrophysics context, the iron-based Fischer-Tropsh is the most considered because the abundances of this element in the Solar Nebula (Fegley 1988; Asplund et al. 2009). There are numerous competitive reactions that determine the rate and the production of organics (Fegley 1988) and several theoretical models have been largely described in material science (see for example the work of Zimmerman & Bukur (1990)). However, the resulting amount of organics is extremely difficult to calculate theoretically when an astrophysical environment is considered. This comes from the large uncertainty in determining, for example, the amount and the surface of catalyst available. Nevertheless, the possible pathways to the formation of carbon-rich material are vastly more numerous. In our Mars+comet case, for example, the reaction CO(g) + H2(g) (cid:10) C + H2O(g) becomes active as well. This is clearly seen in figure 4 where H2(g) and COg are depleting as CH4(g), H2O(g) and C become more stable. In this work we do not perform any kinetics calculation and, since we have only few carbon-solids in our list, we can only suggest that the presence of C and H in Mars+CI, Mars+Comet and Mars+CV impacts can produce complex organics and carbon-enriched dust. The case of Mars+CV is then extremely interesting because there may be enough metallic iron, together with carbon, to enhance the production of complex organics. Equilibrium calculations return an efficient evaporation of the carbon rich dust present in the impactor. However, the rate of vaporisation will be driven by the physical and chemical properties of the carbon species. For example, carbon rich insoluble organic material (IOM), if present, could survive the impact as it is refractory (Pizzarello et al. 12 Pignatale et al. Figure 4. Thermodynamic calculations in the +comet case shows a possible pathway for the condensation of graphite. In fact, together with the well known transformation of CO(g) in CH4(g) (CO(g) + 3H2(g) (cid:10) CH4(g) + H2O(g)), we do see the following reaction: CO(g) + H2(g) (cid:10) C + H2O(g) that occurs at temperature lower than T=600 K. 2006). This could reduce the amount of carbon released in the gas phase. Nevertheless, the presence of carbon in the MMX samples in the form of new condensates and/or in IOM will still be tracer of the nature of the impactor. In section 3 we pointed out that the gas-mixture is volatile-enriched. Figure 3 shows that K-, Na-, and Zn-silicates are stable as the temperature drops. Mono atomic Zn is also predicted for the Mars+EH and Mars+Mars case. There are no dramatic differences between the considered impactors when K, Na and Zn are taken into account. In conclusion, the condensing dust will be volatile (and in some cases, also carbon) enriched compared to the solids that result from the cooling melts. The presence of volatile-rich dust in MMX samples will thus indicate that vaporization followed by condensation had occurred and no volatiles left the system. Moreover, since Na, K and Zn condense at different temperature, their presence/absence could return information on the temperature at which aggregation of a given sample occurred. Mars+CI and Mars+comet are the only cases for which, at low temperature, we see condensation of water vapour into ice. The presence of ice will favour secondary alteration of the dust allowing, for example, the formation of phyllosilicates (Bischoff 1998). 4.2. Solids composition In table 5 we reported the resulting CIPW-norm of the solids if complete equilibration between Mars and impactor occurred. The composition of the solids generally comprises olivine (forsterite and fayalite) and pyroxene (enstatite and ferrosilite). Ronnet et al. (2016) calculated the CIPW normative mineralogy for a Mars, Moon and IDP like impactor. They found that the resulting composition of a mars-like impactor would be olivine and pyroxene rich. In particular their CIPW-norm for Mars is characterized by high olivine content (olivine/pyroxene > 1). olivine/pyroxene ∼ 1, whereas the other cases return a olivine/pyroxene < 1. Our results for the Mars+Mars case show that the solids (deprived of all the vaporized material) will have an There are no dramatic differences between the solids that results from different impactors (except for the aforemen- tioned corundum in the comet case). It is interesting to note that solids that result form cooling melts do not show as much as variation in their composition compared to the dust. The resulting composition of solids appears, thus, to contain less information on the origin of the impactor compared to the large quantities of clues that can be derived from condensed dust. Nonetheless, the composition of melts can be affected by different cooling conditions, microgravity and gas fugacities. Nagashima et al. (2006) and Nagashima et al. (2008) performed laboratory experiments on cooling forsterite and enstatite melts. They found that different cooling rates and microgravity can alter and even suppress crystallisation only allowing the formation of glass material. Further experimental investigations are already planned in order to derive predictions of the composition of the cooling melts. AASTEX Dust composition from impactors 13 On the physical point of view, condensates and solids from melts may be distinguished by their different crystalline structure, microporosity, zoning, interconnections between different phases. Indeed, the resulting physical properties of dust from gas and solids from melts are determined by many factors (Nishinaga 2014). Furthermore Hyodo et al. (2017a) showed that while the size of dust would be in the order of 0.1∼10µm, solids from melts can reach 1∼10m in size and then they can be grinded down to ∼100µm. We could, thus, expect to find different size distributions when dust and solids are compared. 4.3. Infrared spectra of Phobos Giuranna et al. (2011) presented a detailed investigation on the possible composition of the dust and rocks present on the Phobos surface. They suggested that the "blue" part of Phobos is consistent with phyllosilicates while the "red" region is compatible with the presence of feldspar. No bulk chondrite compositions are able to reproduce the current observation (Giuranna et al. 2011). Phyllosilicates are not product of condensations but derive from secondary alterations of silicates (Bischoff 1998) and, as a consequence, they are not predictable with our calculations, although we do have all the dust (silicates) at the base of their formation. The major feldspar compounds are orthoclase (KAlSi3O8), albite (NaAlSi3O8), and anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8). Not all of them are compatible with our model as Na and K are separated from Al after the impact and others are the predicted stable compounds. On the other hand we do see the formation of anorthite (see Table 5). Nevertheless Giuranna et al. (2011) stressed that more fine modelling is needed as a mixture of different materials made of fine grains could also produce the observed trends. This becomes important as previous modelling focused on the analysis of the spectral properties of "external" objects (such as different types of asteroids) to match the observed spectra, as the capture scenario suggests. The impact-generated scenario imposes to re-think this approach. Ronnet et al. (2016) analysed the resulting composition of the melts generated by different impactors in order to find a match with the observations. They concluded that more than the melt, the gas-to-dust condensation in the outer part of an impact-generated disk could be able to explain the Phobos and Deimos spectral properties. This further suggests that our derived dust may play an important part in producing the observed trends. Moreover, since the Hyodo et al. (2017a) disc model shows that melt would be mixed with the gas, the combined effect of dust and solids should be taken into account. In this section we try to predict the effects of our mixed material (dust plus solids) on the infrared spectra. In the introduction we presented possible mechanisms listed by Giuranna et al. (2011) that could be able to reproduce the observed trend in the VIS-NIR. Here we recall them and compare with our results: i) Low percentage of iron-rich olivine and pyroxene can reduce the spectra. Our resulting dust mixtures generally have a very low concentration (∼ 1/ mol% ) of iron-rich olivine (fayalite, Fe2SiO4) and pyroxene (ferrosilite, FeSiO3). Only the high temperature region of Mars+CI shows a larger amount of fayalite (see Fig. 2). ii) A mixture of opaque material (metal iron, iron-oxide, and carbon) reduce the emissivity. We do have a metallic iron-rich dust that results from several impactors (Mars+CV, Mars+EH, and Mars+Mars only at low temperature). Carbon dust is also seen in our calculations (Mars+CV, Mars+CI, Mars+comet). Moreover, together with Fe, iron sulfide (FeS), that we see in Mars+CV, Mars+EH, Mars+CI, Mars+comet, is opaque and featureless in the NIR , but may be recognizable in the MID-IR (Wooden 2008; Henning & Meeus 2011). assemblage, can have the characteristics suggested by Giuranna et al. (2011). iii) Quenched material lacks of perfect crystalline structure and, thus, reflectance. Solids from the melts, in our final iv) The reflectance of fine grains is reduced. The average size of the condensed dust is in the order of 0.1∼10µm Hyodo et al. (2017a). Our proposed model of Phobos as a result of accretion of dust from gas condensation and solids from melts, together with our derived chemical composition looks promising when discussing spectra. Nevertheless there are some aspects that needs further investigation: i) it is important, at this point, to derive the MIDIR spectra of our propose mixtures, and then ii) estimate the effect of space weathering on it and on the resulting albedo. These points can be set as main topic for future works. In this work we assume thermodynamic equilibrium (where all the reactions rates are much shorter than the disk cooling timescale) and mass conservation. All the material is available for reaction until the equilibrium is reached at 4.4. Limitations 14 Pignatale et al. any given temperature. This may be not always the case. As dust condenses out from the gas, it can be subject to different drag forces and it can separate from the current environment. This process can lead to the so called "frac- tionated" condensation sequence. If this is the case, a given dust grain can become representative of the temperature, pressure, gas mixture and dust species that were present when its condensation occurred. Moreover, dust from secondary condensations (from a now fractionated gas) may then form. These fractionated and incomplete condensation sequences have been the subject of several studies (Hutson & Ruzicka 2000; Blander et al. 2009; Pignatale et al. 2016) which all show that different pathways of condensation can depart from the main line. For example, Pignatale et al. (2016) showed that, starting with a gas of solar composition, a mixture of enstatite-rich and SiO2-rich dust can be produced in case of systematic sharp separation between dust and gas. SiO2 is a condensate that is not predicted ("incompatible") when solar abundances are considered. In this work we do not perform fractionated condensation sequences as numerous are the possible pathways. However, in the same way, the presence of some "incompatible" condensates together with "predictable" dust in the same MMX sample may point out to incomplete or secondary condensation. As mentioned, Hyodo et al. (2017a) demonstrated that there will be likely no complete equilibration between the melts of Mars and the melts of the impactor. What is likely to occur is a wide spectrum with different degrees of equilibration. A random sampling of solids may, thus, show material that come from Mars, the impactor or several degrees of mixing. In our calculations we kept the pressure constant and fixed at P = 10−4 bar as in Hyodo et al. (2017a). In general, lower pressures (in order of magnitude) move the condensation of the dust toward lower temperatures (Yoneda & Grossman 1995; Gail 1998). In this case, for our given temperature, more material could vaporize and go into the gas-phase. Increasing the pressure (in order of magnitude) has the opposite effect as the condensation temperature increases. As a consequence, we could observe different amount of Fe, Mg, and Si moving to the gas phase. Changes in disk pressure may also occur if large amount of volatiles are injected in the system after the impact. This could be the case of the Mars+comet impact where the release of H2O(g) and CO(g) could change the total pressure in the disk increasing it, or when a water-rich Mars is considered (Hyodo et al. 2017a). Observed deviations from the predicted trends could then be associated to strong variation in the pressure in the Mars' Moons formation region of the disk or, in fact, to a radial gradient of temperature and pressure in the disk. As reference for future experimental work we report in appendix B (see Fig.6) the partial pressures of the major gas component for Mars+CI, Mars+CV, and Mars+comet impacts. These are the impacts that produce the larger amount of gas such as H2O(g) and CO(g). These values can be used to set up the conditions in which experiments can be performed. 5. CONCLUSIONS In this work we used thermodynamic equilibrium calculation to investigate the chemical composition of dust (from condensing gas) and solids (from cooling melt) as the building blocks of Phobos and Deimos in the impact-generated scenario with the thermodynamic conditions of Hyodo et al. (2017a). We found that dust and solids have different chemical and physical properties. Dust carries more information on the impactor than the solids. Our results show that it would be possible to distinguish from different types of impactors as each case returns several unique tracers in the dust: a Mars+CV has large quantities of metallic iron, SiO2, iron sulfides and carbon; Mars+Comet has pyroxenes and the largest carbon and ice reservoir. Mars+EH impact has dust with high metallic iron content, SiO2, sulfides (FeS and MgS) and traces of SiC. Impact with Mars-like objects returns several iron-oxides, and the dust in Mars+CI has iron-oxides, water ice and carbon. The presence/absence of metallic iron, iron-silicates, iron-oxides, sulfides, carbon and water ice can be considered as clues of different impactors. Deviations from the derived compositions can be then ascribed to fractionated conden- sation sequences and/or strong variations in the disk pressure and/or impactors with different elemental composition than investigated in this study. The giant impact scenario imposes to re-think the dust modelling for the infrared spectra, as Phobos, in this case, would be made of a complex mixture of dust and solids and not of a pre-built object as the capture scenario suggests. A qualitative analysis suggests that our derived composition of dust and solid can be compatible with the characteristic of the Phobos VIS-NIR spectra. In conclusion, the proposed scenario of Phobos as the result of accretion of dust and solid in an impact-generated disk can reconcile with both the dynamical and spectral properties of the Mars' moon. Our dust tracers can be then used in the analysis of the samples returned by the JAXA's MMX mission. AASTEX Dust composition from impactors 15 Figure 5. Condensation sequence for major solids (left) and gas (right) starting with an initial gas with solar composition. There is a very good agreement between these results and those reported in Pignatale et al. (2011) and reference therein. Software: HSC (v8; Roine (2002)) The authors wish to thank the anonymous referee for their comments and suggestions that let us investigate our assumptions in more details which improved the manuscript. The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of ANR-15-CE31-0004-1 (ANR CRADLE), INFINITI (INterFaces Interdisciplinaires Num`erIque et Th`eorIque), Uni- vEarthS Labex program at Sorbonne Paris Cite (ANR-10- LABX-0023 and ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02). PR has been financially supported, for his preliminary contribution to this work, by the Belgian PRODEX programme managed by the European Space Agency in collaboration with the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office. SC, RH, and HG acknowledge the financial support of the JSPS-MAEDI bilateral joint research project (SAKURA program). HG also acknowledges JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. JP17H02990 and JP17H06457, and thanks the Astrobiolgy Center of the National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS). APPENDIX A. SOLAR CONDENSATION SEQUENCE Condensation sequences calculated with solar abundances are very distinctive and characterized by smooth transi- tions between refractories, main silicates and metallic iron and low temperature material (such as sulfides) (Larimer 1979; Yoneda & Grossman 1995; Lodders 2003; Pignatale et al. 2011). Fig. 5 reports the condensation sequence calculated with our thermodynamic system and the solar abundances listed in Table 1 in the temperature range of 150 < T (K) < 2000 and pressure P = 10−4 bar. The small fraction of solids that are stable at high temperature (T > 1400 K) are the refractories calcium-alluminum silicates while at T ∼ 1400 K iron, forsterite and enstatite condense. At lower temperature we see the formation of troilite (FeS) and fayalite (Fe2SiO4). CO(g), H2O(g) and SiO(g) are the main O-binding gaseous species. At T ∼ 700 K we see the conversion of CO(g) to CH4, while H2S is the main sulfur-binding gas until the condensation of troilite. These results are in very good agreement with previous works (Larimer 1979; Yoneda & Grossman 1995; Lodders 2003) on the solar condensation sequence and make us confident on our built system. B. PARTIAL PRESSURES OF MAIN GASEOUS COMPOUNDS In figure 6 we report the partial pressures for the main gaseous species as they result from our equilibrium calculations. The chosen case are Mars+CI, Mars+CV and Mars+comet. These are the impacts that introduce H, C, and O in the system. In our calculations ideal gas are considered. As a consequence their partial pressure can be taken as a proxy for their fugacity. These values can be used to set the initial gas environment in further experimental studies. 16 Pignatale et al. Figure 6. Partial pressure for major gas in the Mars+CI, Mars+CV and Mars+comet impacts. The total pressure of the system is P = 10−4 bar. REFERENCES Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, -. 1990c, Icarus, 84, 315 A&ARA, 47, 481 Bischoff, A. 1998, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 33, 1113 Blander, M., Pelton, A. D., & Jung, I.-H. 2009, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 44, 531 Bond, J. C., O'Brien, D. P., & Lauretta, D. S. 2010, ApJ, 715, 1050 Bottke, W. F., & Andrews-Hanna, J. C. 2017, Nature Geoscience, 10, 344348 Cloutis, E. A., Smith, D. G. W., Lambert, R. S. J., & Gaffey, M. J. 1990d, Icarus, 86, 383 Craddock, R. A. 2011, Icarus, 211, 1150 Cross, W., Iddings, J. P., Pirsson, L. V., & Washington, H. S. 1902, The Journal of Geology, 10, 555 DeHoff, R. 1993, Thermodynamics in Materials Science (McGraw-Hill International Editions) Ebel, D. S. 2006, Condensation of Rocky Material in Brasser, R., & Mojzsis, S. J. 2017, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, Astrophysical Environments, ed. D. S. Lauretta & H. Y. 5978 McSween, 253–277 Brasser, R., Mojzsis, S. J., Matsumura, S., & Ida, S. 2017, Ebel, D. S., & Grossman, L. 2001, GeoCoA, 65, 469 Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 468, 85 Burns, R. G. 1993, Mineralogical applications of crystal field theory, Vol. 5 (Cambridge University Press) Citron, R. I., Genda, H., & Ida, S. 2015, Icarus, 252, 334 Cloutis, E. A., Gaffey, M. J., Smith, D. G. W., & Lambert, R. S. J. 1990a, J. Geophys. Res., 95, doi:10.1029/JB095iB06p08323 -. 1990b, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 281 Fegley, Jr., B. 1988, in Origins of Solar Systems, ed. J. A. Nuth & P. Sylvester Ferrarotti, A. S., & Gail, H.-P. 2001, A&A, 371, 133 Gail, H.-P. 1998, A&A, 332, 1099 Gail, H.-P., & Sedlmayr, E. 1999, A&A, 347, 594 Giuranna, M., Roush, T. L., Duxbury, T., et al. 2011, Planet. Space Sci., 59, 1308 AASTEX Dust composition from impactors 17 Henning, T., & Meeus, G. 2011, Dust Processing and Mineralogy in Protoplanetary Accretion Disks, ed. P. J. V. Garcia, 114–148 Hesselbrock, A. J., & Minton, D. A. 2017, Nature Geoscience, 10, 266 Huebner, W. F., & Boice, D. C. 1997, Polymers and Other Macromolecules in Comets, ed. P. J. Thomas, C. F. Chyba, & C. P. McKay (New York, NY: Springer New York), 111–129 Hutson, M., & Ruzicka, A. 2000, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 35, 601 Hyodo, R., Genda, H., Charnoz, S., & Rosenblatt, P. 2017a, ApJ, 845, 125 Pasek, M. A., Milsom, J. A., Ciesla, F. J., et al. 2005, Icarus, 175, 1 Pignatale, F. C., Liffman, K., Maddison, S. T., & Brooks, G. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 1359 Pignatale, F. C., Maddison, S. T., Taquet, V., Brooks, G., & Liffman, K. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 2386 Pizzarello, S., Cooper, G. W., & Flynn, G. J. 2006, The Nature and Distribution of the Organic Material in Carbonaceous Chondrites and Interplanetary Dust Particles, ed. D. S. Lauretta & H. Y. McSween, 625–651 Raymond, S. N., & Izidoro, A. 2017, Icarus, 297, 134 Rivkin, A. S., Brown, R. H., Trilling, D. E., Bell, J. F., & Hyodo, R., Rosenblatt, P., Genda, H., & Charnoz, S. 2017b, ApJ, arXiv:1711.02334 Plassmann, J. H. 2002, Icarus, 156, 64 Roine, A. 2002, User's guide, version, 5 Klima, R. L., Pieters, C. M., & Dyar, M. D. 2007, Ronnet, T., Vernazza, P., Mousis, O., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 42, 235 109 Larimer, J. W. 1975, GeoCoA, 39, 389 -. 1979, Icarus, 40, 446 Lodders, K. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220 Lodders, K., & Fegley, B. 1997, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 402, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, ed. T. J. Bernatowicz & E. Zinner, 391–423 Madhusudhan, N., Lee, K. K. M., & Mousis, O. 2012, ApJL, 759, L40 Murchie, S. 1999, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 9069 Murchie, S. L., Thomas, P. C., Rivkin, A. S., & Chabot, N. L. 2015, Phobos and Deimos, ed. P. Michel, F. E. DeMeo, & W. F. Bottke, 451–467 Murchie, S. L., Britt, D. T., Head, J. W., et al. 1991, Rosenblatt, P. 2011, A&A Rv, 19, 44 Rosenblatt, P., Charnoz, S., Dunseath, K. M., et al. 2016, Nature Geoscience, 9, 581 Salisbury, J. W., & Walter, L. S. 1989, J. Geophys. Res., 94, doi:10.1029/JB094iB07p09192 Sekine, Y., Sugita, S., Shido, T., et al. 2006, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 41, 715 Singer, R. B. 1981, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 7967 Visscher, C., & Fegley, Jr., B. 2013, ApJl, 767, L12 Wasson, J. T., & Kallemeyn, G. W. 1988, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 325, 535 White, W., Johnson, S., & Dantzig, G. 1958, J. Chemical J. Geophys. Res., 96, 5925 Phys., 28, 751 Nagashima, K., Moriuchi, Y., Tsukamoto, K., Tanaka, Wooden, D. H. 2008, Cometary Refractory Grains: K. K., & Kobatake, H. 2008, Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences, 103, 204 Interstellar and Nebular Sources, ed. H. Balsiger, K. Altwegg, W. Huebner, T. Owen, & R. Schulz (New Nagashima, K., Tsukamoto, K., Satoh, H., Kobatake, H., & York, NY: Springer New York), 75–108 Dold, P. 2006, Journal of Crystal Growth, 293, 193 Nishinaga, T. 2014, Handbook of Crystal Growth: Fundamentals (Elsevier) Nuth, III, J. A., Johnson, N. M., & Manning, S. 2008, ApJL, 673, L225 Yoneda, S., & Grossman, L. 1995, Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 3413 Zimmerman, W., & Bukur, D. 1990, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 68, doi:10.1002/cjce.5450680215
1611.00051	2	1611	2017-03-21T20:40:30	CO in distantly active comets	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Activity of most comets near the Sun is dominated by sublimation of frozen water, the most abundant ice in comets. Some comets, however, are active well beyond the water-ice sublimation limit of ~3 AU. Three bodies dominate the observational record and modeling efforts for distantly active comets: the long-period comet C/1995 O1 Hale-Bopp and the short-period comets (with Centaur orbits) 29P/Schwassmann Wachmann 1 and 2060 Chiron. We summarize what is known about these three objects emphasizing their gaseous comae. We calculate their CN/CO and CO2/CO production rate ratios from the literature and discuss implications. Using our own data we derive CO production rates for all three objects, in order to examine a correlation between gas production and different orbital histories and/or size. We find that orbital history does not appear to play a significant role in explaining 29P's CO production rates. 29P outproduces Hale-Bopp at the same heliocentric distance, even though it has been subjected to much more solar heating. Previous modeling work on such objects predicts that 29P should have been de-volatilized over a fresher comet like Hale-Bopp. This may point to 29P having a different orbital history than current models predict, with its current orbit acquired more recently. On the other hand, Chiron's CO measurements are consistent with it being significantly depleted over its original state, perhaps due to increased radiogenic heating made possible by its much larger size or its higher processing due to orbital history. Observed spectral line profiles are consistent with development and sublimation of icy grains at about 5-6 AU for 29P and Hale-Bopp, and this is probably a common feature in distantly active comets, and an important source of volatiles for all comets within 5 AU. In contrast, the narrow CO line profiles indicate a nuclear, and not extended, origin for CO beyond ~4 AU.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	CO in distantly active comets M. Womack1, G. Sarid2, K. Wierzchos1 1University of South Florida, 2Florida Space Institute, University of Central Florida Received ; accepted 7 1 0 2 r a M 1 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 1 5 0 0 0 . 1 1 6 1 : v i X r a – 2 – 1. Abstract The activity of most comets near the Sun is dominated by the sublimation of frozen water, the most abundant ice in comets. Some comets, however, are active well beyond the water-ice sublimation limit of ∼ 3 AU. Three bodies dominate the observational record and modeling efforts for distantly active comets: the long-period comet C/1995 O1 Hale-Bopp and the short-period comets (with Centaur orbits) 29P/Schwassmann Wachmann 1 and 2060 Chiron. We summarize what is known about these three objects with an emphasis on their gaseous comae. We calculate their CN/CO and CO2/CO production rate ratios from the literature and discuss implications. Using our own data we derive CO production rates, Q(CO), for all three objects, in order to examine whether there is a correlation between gas production and different orbital histories and/or size. We further examine the applicability of existing models in explaining the systematic behavior of our small sample. We find that orbital history does not appear to play a significant role in explaining 29P's CO production rates. 29P outproduces Hale-Bopp at the same heliocentric distance, even though it has been subjected to much more solar heating. Previous modeling work on such objects predicts that 29P should have been devolatilized over a fresher comet like Hale-Bopp. This may point to 29P having a different orbital history than current models predict, with its current orbit acquired more recently. On the other hand, Chiron's CO measurements are consistent with it being significantly depleted over its original state, perhaps due to increased radiogenic heating made possible by its much larger size or its higher processing due to orbital history. Observed spectral line profiles are consistent with the development and sublimation of icy grains in the coma at about 5-6 AU for 29P and Hale-Bopp, and this is probably a common feature in distantly active comets, and an important source of volatiles for all comets within 5 AU. In contrast, the narrow CO line profiles indicate a nuclear, and not extended, origin for CO beyond ∼ 4 AU. – 3 – 2. Introduction As a typical comet approaches the inner solar system it develops a coma when frozen water begins to sublimate at ∼ 3 AU from the Sun.1 Some comets, however, exhibit measurable activity beyond this water ice sublimation boundary (Whitney 1955; Roemer 1962; Meech & Jewitt 1987; Hughes 1991; Sekanina et al. 1992), and up to a third of all comets observed become active beyond 3 AU (Mazzotta Epifani et al. 2007). Sublimation of water ice may still generate some activity beyond the normal water-ice sublimation boundary of ∼ 3 AU. Even at very large distances, water ice sublimation can still occur if triggered by impacts from other small bodies, tidal disruption from interactions with massive planets, and interactions with solar flares and solar wind erosion (Strazzulla et al. 1983; Stern 1995; Sekanina et al. 1994; Boss 1994). Collectively, however, these possible water-ice sublimation triggers are unlikely to generate the long-lived comae observed in most distantly active comets (Mumma et al. 1993). Thus, most comets that are active beyond ∼ 3 to 4 AU should be considered to have comae which are generated by a volatile other than water. Understanding how comae are generated in comets is critical to developing accurate 1This is the heliocentric distance at which the sublimation temperature of water ice, Tsub ∼ 150 K, assuming a gas density of ∼ 10−13 cm−3, (Yamamoto 1985), equals the blackbody temperature of a fast rotating spherical comet nucleus, Tbb, according to Tbb = (cid:18)1 − A ǫ (cid:19)1/4 T⊙(cid:18)R⊙ 2r (cid:19)1/2 , (1) where A = nucleus bond albedo (typically assumed to be in the range of 0.03 – 0.15), ǫ is the surface emissivity (∼ 0.5 - 0.9), R⊙ and T⊙ are radius and temperature of the Sun, respectively. – 4 – models of nucleus composition. The activity of distant comets also has important implications for other icy objects in the outer solar system, some of which may share common origins with comets. For example, some short-period comets may be collision fragments from Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs) (Farinella & Davis 1996; Durda & Stern 2000; Schulz 2002; Dones et al. 2015). Also, KBOs, Pluto and even icy moons may also experience similar physical and chemical conditions as distantly active comets (Weissman 1999; Bockel´ee-Morvan et al. 2001). Analysis of visible and infrared observations often provide useful information, such as the extended comae of distant comets are composed primarily of dust grains with a total mass of ∼ 109kg and coma expansion velocities of 0.3 km s−1 or less (also see Whitney 1955; Hughes 1991; Trigo-Rodr´ıguez et al. 2010; Kulyk et al. 2016). Visible lightcurves often show variations of two to four magnitudes over a few weeks and much smaller amplitude changes over a few hours. The larger amplitude changes are typically assumed to be due to significant mass loss; on the other hand, smaller amplitude variations are often attributed to the rotation state of the comet's nucleus (Whipple 1980; Meech et al. 1993). In addition to dust, gaseous emission has also been detected. CO+, CN and OH were the first volatiles observed in distantly active comets (Cochran et al. 1980; Wyckoff et al. 1985), but they cannot drive the activity. This is because they are produced through ionization or dissociation of other molecules in the coma and do not exist in the nucleus. Observations of these species, however, are still useful as tracers of their parent molecules (Cochran & Cochran 1991; A'Hearn et al. 1984; Feldman et al. 2004). For example, spectra of OH emission may be useful in determining whether H2O (the presumed parent of OH) is sublimating. When CN is observed, then HCN is likely to be abundant near the surface or in the coma. However, we cannot rule out a distributed source, such as C2N2, HC3N or even N-bearing refractories as a parent of CN (Feldman et al. 2004; Despois et al. – 5 – 2005; Festou et al. 1998). CO is difficult to photoionize beyond 5 AU from the Sun, so detecting CO+ implies either unusual ionization of CO, or more likely, a very large amount of CO being released in the coma. Thus, CO+ may be a useful tracer of CO emission (Magnani & A'Hearn 1986; Cochran & Cochran 1991). Carbon monoxide is of particular interest, because of its identification as a "supervolatile" (cosmogonically abundant molecules with sufficient equilibrium vapor pressures to vigorously sublimate at very large (> 35 AU) heliocentric distances) (see Table 1). A breakthrough in understanding distantly active comets occurred when CO gaseous emission was detected at millimeter wavelengths in comet 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 (hereafter referred to as 29P) at ∼ 6 AU in amounts significantly higher than the dust production rates (Senay & Jewitt 1994). Carbon monoxide was already suspected of being in 29P's coma, because of the previously observed CO+ in 29P (Larson 1980; Cochran & Cochran 1991) and the very low sublimation temperature of CO ice; indeed, its detection in comets was predicted based on favorable excitation conditions and expected production rates (Crovisier & Le Bourlot 1983). The following year, CO emission was also detected in C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) over 6.8 - 6.0 AU (Jewitt et al. 1996; Biver et al. 1996; Womack et al. 1997), and in 2060 Chiron at 8.5 AU (Womack & Stern 1999). Doubts were raised about the Chiron CO detection (Bockel´ee-Morvan et al. 2001); however, an independent re-analysis (Jewitt et al. 2008) maintained that the CO line was formally detected in Chiron. The derived CO production rates were high enough that CO outgassing was assumed to be the main cause of activity for all three objects (Table 2). Other highly volatile and abundant gases, such as CO2, CH4, and N2 may contribute to distant activity, but are difficult to observe (Prialnik et al. 2004; Ootsubo et al. 2012; Reach et al. 2013a; Bauer et al. 2015a). CO2, CH4 and N2 do not possess an electric dipole moment and thus have no rotational transitions, which are needed for observations at – 6 – millimeter wavelengths. They have transitions at infrared wavelengths, but the emission often suffers telluric contamination and are weakly excited by solar radiation beyond 4 AU. Observations from space-based telescopes indicate that CO2 is much more abundant than CO in a large survey of distant comets (see summaries by Ootsubo et al. (2012); McKay et al. (2012)). CO2-dominated outflows are documented in comets 103P/Hartley2 (A'Hearn et al. 2011) and 67P from spacecraft data (Hassig et al. 2015), which show that CO2 is a major player for these comets closer to the Sun. As we discuss later, all available data indicate that CO2 is not likely responsible for most of the observed activity in 29P, Hale-Bopp, and Chiron. Methane has not been detected in distant comets, although significant limits were set for 29P (see Table 2). N2 emission in comets can be estimated from optical spectra of N+ 2 (Womack et al. 1992; Lutz et al. 1993; Cochran et al. 2000; Cochran 2002; Ivanova et al. 2016) and with mass spectroscopy from spacecraft data (Rubin et al. 2015). All detections, or non-detection limits, point to N2 abundances being much lower than that of CO in comets, including Hale-Bopp and 29P. In addition, the nitrogen depletion issue in comets (Cochran et al. 2000; Iro et al. 2003) make it unlikely that N2 plays a substantial role in driving distant comet activity. Other volatiles have been detected beyond 3 AU, but their low production rates also indicate that they are unlikely to generate much of the observed distant activity. For example, CH3OH, HCN, H2CO, H2S and CS were identified in spectra of Hale-Bopp far from the Sun, but with production rates all significantly lower than CO production rates (Biver 1997; Womack et al. 1997). Although most cometary studies focus on abundances from near comets, large helio- centric coverage is also needed to aid compositional studies of all comets (Dello Russo et al. 2016). Although many measurements exist of distant comets, the causes of the activity are not well understood. In this paper we summarize possible energy sources and observational – 7 – results, and make a comparative study of 29P, Hale-Bopp and Chiron. Although the dust and gas counterparts of the comae are both addressed, the main emphasis is on the volatiles (mainly CO), since they are directly involved in generating the distant activity. Studying CO's behavior beyond 4 AU is especially important to confirm its natal contributions and study it in isolation (Pierce & A'Hearn 2010). 3. Proposed Mechanisms to Generate Comae Far from the Sun Solar radiation is the most significant energy source for comets. Consequently, the heliocentric distance, albedo and seasonal effects of the nucleus all play vital roles in how the energy is balanced in a comet on the surface and in the sub-surface layers of a comet nucleus. Here we review energy sources that may play a significant role in sustained activity at large distances, such as supervolatile sublimation, crystallization of amorphous water ice, and radioactive decay. First, we consider supervolatile sublimation and outgassing. If comet material started off very cold (such as the temperatures needed initially to maintain CO, N2 or CH4 in solid form), then their deep interiors may not have experienced any warming episodes, and highly volatile species can be preserved in the nucleus. Sublimation of such "supervolatile" ices can drive activity far from the Sun, and possibly beyond 40 AU for the most volatile CO. One concern raised about supervolatile ices is that severe devolatilization may have occurred due to significant heating over the ∼ 4.6 Gyr since the comets formed. As Kouchi & Sirono (2001) point out, however, laboratory results indicate an extremely low thermal conductivity for water ice in comets, suggesting that heating is negligible below the outer several tens of centimeters, and so extends the lifetime of supervolatiles in comet nuclei. Additionally, we point out the abundant evidence for cometary supervolatiles, as recorded by observations and space mission experiements, which show that supervolatiles are long-lived in cometary – 8 – nuclei and have not been exhausted close to the Sun or preferentially in comets that sustain more heating (such as Jupiter Family comets, which have low orbital inclinations and orbital periods shorter than ∼ 20 years) as compared to new comets (A'Hearn et al. 2011, 2012; Hassig et al. 2015; Dello Russo et al. 2016). Next, we examine the amorphous water ice crystallization phase change in comet nuclei. If cometary water originates primarily from preserved interstellar grains, or from the distant outer regions of the solar disk, then it is likely to accumulate in an amorphous state (Kouchi et al. 1994; Irvine et al. 2000). Upon heating, such ice undergoes a solid phase transition to a crystalline structure. The lab-measured threshold for transition to cubic ice is ∼100 K, with another transition from cubic to hexagonal ice at ∼160 K (Laufer et al. 1987). However, only the first transition is exothermic and it involves a significant change in specific density and arrangement of ice structure, so that trapped molecules can be released. The functional form for the amorphous-crystalline transition, with 95% of the ice changing to the crystalline phase in a time (sec) tc, was derived as tc = 9.54 × 10−14 exp(5370/T ) (3) at a temperature T (K), for the range of 125-150 K, (Schmitt et al. 1989). Extrapolation to lower temperatures gives 120 K as the activation temperature, where the rate becomes rapid (∼1 month). This is commonly used as a nominal crystallization temperature. This phase transition could release enough energy, approximately 109 ergs g−1 (Ghormley 1968; Klinger 1981), to increase the temperature of the surrounding ice by another 45 K (Enzian et al. 1997). This, in turn, could trigger even more crystallization and sublimation, creating a runaway crystallization effect (Patashnick 1974; Prialnik et al. 1992). Accordingly, much of the outermost ice of a comet that has been heated to ∼ 140 K is expected to be in the crystalline form. This could mean that most, if not all, of the – 9 – comets that make repeated approaches within 5 AU 2 of the Sun should have crystalline water ice on the outermost layers of the nucleus. In addition to releasing energy, this phase transition decreases the density of ice from ρa ∼ 1.2 g cm−3 to ρc ∼ 0.9 g cm−3. This structural change releases gas molecules that were trapped in the original ice, such as CO and CO2 (Bar-Nun et al. 1988; Bar-Nun & Owen 1998; Prialnik et al. 1995). Runaway amorphous ice crystallization is modulated by the fact that laboratory studies show that exothermic crystallization occurs only for pure amorphous ice. Slight impurity levels (such as > 2% in mol of CO in the ice matrix) in the ice are enough to reduce the effective latent heat of crystallization, thus reducing the exothermic nature of the process (Kouchi & Sirono 2001). This could result in isolated bursts, rather than crystallizing all at once. Crystallization of amorphous water ice is a mechanism included in many theoretical models of distantly active comets (e.g., Prialnik & Bar-Nun 1990a,b; Capria et al. 2000; Sarid et al. 2005). While a few other exothermic mechanisms have been suggested, such as polymerization of condensed-phase HCN (e.g., Rettig et al. 1992; Matthews 1995) and melting and dissolution of gases (Miles 2016), these processes have not been put to a quantitative test or included in a full account of the energetics involved in cometary evolution. Radiogenic heating is an additional source of energy in distant comets that may deplete significant amounts of frozen CO and other supervolatiles from the nucleus (Prialnik et al. 1987; Haruyama et al. 1993; Prialnik et al. 1995; De Sanctis et al. 2001a). The effectiveness of this mechanism depends critically on such parameters as the diffusivity and thermal 2Four to five AU is the approximate heliocentric range where a nucleus is expected to reach 140K due to solar heating, see equation 1. – 10 – conductivity of the nucleus, both of which have a large range in values for the ice and silicate components. However, if the nucleus is smaller than a radius of ∼10 km, then the cooling timescale from radiogenic heating is shorter than the heating timescale. These objects would effectively get rid of the excess energy generated by radioactive decay quicker than this energy can promote a thermodynamic heating cycle on icy layers (Prialnik & Podolak 1995; Prialnik et al. 2008). Hence, for comets with nuclei smaller than 10km, the initial temperature is probably preserved deeper than about 100 meters. One important concern with modeling cometary ice is that the experimental value of the thermal conductivity of water ice is 104 times lower than the theoretical value (Klinger 1980; Kouchi et al. 1992), yet both quantities have been used in models of distantly active comets. The grain packing configuration and appreciable porosity can change the thermal conductivity by orders of magnitude. It is affected by the porosity, Hertz factor (the contact area relative to cross-sectional area of material grains) and the specific thermal conductivity of the ice (what phase of ice and its level of impurity) and pores (depends on the shape and inter-connectivity of the porous space). The surface-to-volume ratio of the pores is also sensitive to the actual pore size distribution, at any given layer of the nucleus, and can vary by a few orders of magnitude (Sarid et al. 2005). If CO sublimation generates activity in a distant comet, a simple estimate of the sublimating area, a, on the nucleus can be derived using the following equation, assuming that the nucleus is a rapid rotator a = (dM/dt)r2LCO F⊙(1 − A) , (4) where dM/dt is the total mass loss rate of CO, F⊙ = 1360 W/m2, r is heliocentric distance in AU, LCO is the latent heat of sublimation for CO, and A is the Bond albedo of the nucleus. For example, using dM/dt = 2000 kg s−1 from the CO observations, this estimate gives a circular spot with an emitting radius of ∼ 2 - 6 km, depending on whether the CO – 11 – is released as a sublimating ice (LCO ∼ 4 × 105 J/kg), or as a trapped gas in water ice (LCO ∼ 1.5 × 106 J/kg) (Brown & Ziegler 1979), corresponding to < 0.1% of the surface area for 29P and Hale-Bopp. As a cautionary statement, one should consider that sometimes volatiles detected in the coma did not originate directly from the comet's nucleus, and thus do not play a role in generating activity. For example, a source could be ice-coated grains of refractory material expelled from the nucleus (Delsemme & Miller 1971; Hanner 1981, 1984). Once in the solar radiation field, there is enough energy available (if within ∼ 5-6 AU of the Sun) for the ice-coatings to sublimate. Such grains reportedly are destroyed very quickly (within 20 hours for 1 micron sized grains) once their temperatures reach ∼ 150K (Lamy 1974). Evidence for the sublimation of icy grains was seen in the emission of OH at 308 nm in comet Bowell, which was detected as the comet moved from 5 to 3 AU (A'Hearn et al. 1984, 1995). Icy grains with radii of 7 - 30 micron were determined to exist in Hale-Bopp's coma with a median lifetime of about two days at 2.9 AU (Lellouch et al. 1998). Further evidence is found from spectral line-widths of methanol and other species in Hale-Bopp at ∼ 5 AU, which were much wider than one would expect for molecules sublimating directly from the nucleus (Womack et al. 1997). 103P/Hartley 2 was also observed by the EPOXI mission and the large effective sublimation area derived from photometric observations was determined to be from ice grains sublimating, but at much closer distances to the Sun (Protopapa et al. 2014; Kelley et al. 2013). 4. Observations of Distantly Active Comets In this section, we review what is known about each object, and in the next section we examine the similarities and differences between these objects and propose a common – 12 – model that may explain the distant activity. 4.1. Comet Hale-Bopp Comet Hale-Bopp presented an exceptional opportunity to study distant activity, since it already had a giant coma upon discovery at 7 AU. It is a long-period comet with a high-inclination orbit, and, thus has a very different orbital history than either 29P or Chiron. Because it has spent most of its lifetime very far from the Sun, it is probably less processed than many other comets. It is a very large comet - its nucleus radius was measured to be in the range of R = 20 - 35 km (Weaver & Lamy 1997; Sekanina 1997; Fern´andez et al. 1999), and RHale−Bopp = 30 ± 10 km was recommended as a compromise (Fern´andez 2000), which we adopt for calculations in a later section. Hale-Bopp's radius is very similar to 29P, but much smaller than Chiron. Hale-Bopp exhibited several changes as it approached the Sun. There were reports of a swirled "jet" and a few outbursts in the dust coma from 7 to 6 AU (Sekanina 1996; Weaver et al. 1997). Multiple porcupine-like features were first observed during May-Jul 1996 at r ∼ 4 AU and continued for several months during perihelion approach (Boehnhardt et al. 1997; Braunstein et al. 1997; Weaver et al. 1997). Surface brightness profiles of Hale-Bopp's coma at ∼ 7 AU were fit with a power law and had a slope of s = −0.9 to −1.2 (Weaver et al. 1997), which is consistent with a spherically symmetric outflowing coma subject to solar radiation pressure. Numerous records were set for the detections of cometary gases at large heliocentric distances with Hale-Bopp, including the first time that CH3OH, HCN, H2S, CO2 and H2CO were observed in a comet beyond 4 AU (Womack et al. 1997; Biver et al. 1997b; Woodney et al. 1997; Crovisier et al. 1997). Many of these species were observed at even – 13 – larger distances post-perihelion (Biver et al. 1997b, 2002). Carbon monoxide emission was first detected in Hale-Bopp at ∼ 6.8 AU (Jewitt et al. 1996; Biver et al. 1996) with production rates high enough to cause the observed dust production. CO2 emission was detected at 4-5 AU via its vibrational bands at 4.3 µm and inferred from CO Cameron band emission, present at ∼ 15% of the production rate of CO (Crovisier 1997; Weaver et al. 1997). A strong upper limit was obtained for N+ 2 in Hale-Bopp near perihelion by Cochran et al. (2000), which when compared with CO+ measurements is also consistent with N2 produced in much smaller quantities than CO. The production rates of OH (a proxy for H2O), CH3OH, HCN, H2S and H2CO were all much lower than those of CO. We conclude that Hale-Bopp's gas coma was dominated by CO whenever the comet was beyond 4 AU pre-perihelion (Weaver et al. 1997; Womack et al. 1997; Biver et al. 2002). The physical state of Hale-Bopp's coma volatiles is revealed by their millimeter- wavelength spectral line profiles. For example, CO spectra had a velocity blue-shift of ∼ 0.4 km s−1, and narrow line-widths of FWHM ∼ 0.3-0.4 km s−1 (Biver et al. 1996; Jewitt et al. 1996). The narrow line-widths are consistent with originating from deeper and colder regions in the nucleus. At larger distances, the CO line profile occasionally exhibited two narrow blue-shifted peaks (Womack et al. 1997; Gunnarsson et al. 2003); however, a single peak was observed most of the time. The velocity vector component of the spectra shows a sunward release of CO into the coma. The CO line-shape was different post-perihelion and exhibited a red-shifted peak along with a blue-shifted peak. The double peaks were interpreted by Gunnarsson et al. (2003) as evidence for both nuclear and extended CO sources, similar to their model for 29P. Interestingly, beyond ∼ 4 AU, the spectral line profiles of most other species were significantly different from that of CO. For example, CH3OH, OH, HCN and H2S had much broader line-widths than CO, and very little, if any, velocity shifts (see Figure 1). – 14 – Their line-widths were FWHM ∼ 0.7 to 1.5 km s−1 over the range of 5 to 4 AU. Beyond 4 AU, CO linewidths were typically much narrower, 0.4 km s−1, although occasionally the line was observed to be much broader (Womack et al. 1997; Biver et al. 2002). Since the spectral linewidths are mostly a result of the thermal distribution of the gas, different production mechanisms between CO and the other molecules are responsible for most of the observed variation in line profiles. The broader, cometocentric line profiles may be explained if H2O, CH3OH, HCN, H2CO and H2S were first released into the coma on grains, and then sublimated when they accumulated enough energy from the solar radiation field. Volatiles released from a symmetric halo surrounding the nucleus will appear centered on the ephemeris velocity. They will also be at a higher temperature and have a larger velocity distribution (and larger line-widths) than those released directly off the nucleus. Occasionally, HCN and CH3OH spectra mimicked the CO line profile shape, which may indicate that they were produced from two or more methods (Gunnarsson et al. 2008). Unfortunately, the CO2 band at 4.3 microns in Hale-Bopp is not spectrally resolved and, so, one cannot derive a useful upper limit to velocity information of the CO2 emission. The pre-perihelion production rates and narrow line profiles of CO, and dust production rates, in Hale-Bopp are best reproduced by nucleus models that contain amorphous water ice with trapped CO gas, small amounts of CO ice, and crystallization of water ice starting at ∼ 7 AU from the Sun (Prialnik & Podolak 1999; Enzian 1999; Capria et al. 2002). Prior to crystallization, sublimation of solid CO is invoked as the dominant source of activity, without detailing the source of CO ice in the nucleus. The models predict slightly higher production rates post-perihelion than pre-perihelion, which was not seen by Biver et al. (2002); Gunnarsson et al. (2003). This suggests that thermal inertia was not very important for Hale-Bopp once the comet was beyond 4 AU, and therefore most of the activity is at or near the surface of the nucleus. Observations are also consistent with the activity being well-correlated with insolation, as evidenced by symmetric behavior of gas and dust – 15 – production rates before and after perihelion (Biver et al. 2002). 4.2. Chiron 2060 Chiron is an unusual icy minor planet. When it was discovered in 1977, it was categorized as the most distant known asteroid. Its reflectance spectrum had a relatively neutral "color", similar to C-class asteroids (Lebofsky et al. 1984; Hartmann et al. 1990; Stern et al. 2014), and it occasionally outbursts and develops a coma, which warrants it a formal comet designation (Tholen et al. 1988; Meech & Belton 1990). Evidence for CN and CO gaseous emission (Bus et al. 1991; Womack & Stern 1999) further secured the cometary identity. In addition to its cometary designation, orbital dynamical studies place Chiron among the small population of large, outer solar system objects called Centaurs, which are moderately sized Kuiper Belt Objects that have moved in closer, with unstable orbits, and cross one or more giant planet orbits (e.g., Fernandez 1980; Stern 1989; Hahn & Bailey 1990; Levison & Duncan 1994; Fernandez & Gallardo 1994). Its brightness varies significantly on both short and long timescales, with changes in V and R mag of ∼ 0.05 − 0.10 magnitudes over hours and > 1.5 mag over months and years (Tholen et al. 1988; Bus et al. 1989; Luu & Jewitt 1990; Buratti & Dunbar 1991; Duffard et al. 2002). A water-ice signature was detected in the near-infrared, which also appears to vary over time (Foster et al. 1999; Luu et al. 2000; Romon-Martin et al. 2003). It is not known whether the ice is primarily crystalline or amorphous; however, the measured color temperature (the equivalent blackbody temperature that is derived from the continuum spectrum of an object) of the nucleus is high enough (125 - 140 K) to trigger the crystallization phase change (Campins et al. 1994). – 16 – One of the most puzzling aspects of Chiron is that none of these changes are correlated well with heliocentric distance. In fact, Chiron reached peak brightness in the visible in 1989 at ∼ 11 AU, several years before perihelion, and it may have been even brighter than this at aphelion, 19 AU (Bus et al. 1993). For decades, the light curve was largely unexplained - other than some of the short-term variations being attributed to reflection off a rotating nucleus (Bus et al. 1989; Marcialis & Buratti 1993; Lazzaro et al. 1997). Attempts were made to fit the remaining light curve contributions with a model of amorphous water ice and a highly volatile ice, such as CO and/or CH4, with a dust mantle (Fanale & Salvail 1997), but they could not explain the lack of correlation with heliocentric distance. Recently, however, these unusual changes in light curve and spectra have been explained as due to reflected light from a ring system circling Chiron, based on occultation data (Ortiz et al. 2015; Ruprecht et al. 2015). The proposed rings can account for most of the short- and long-term brightness variations, largely by a change in their orbital tilt, if the ring particles have a different albedo than the surface. This may also explain the observed changes in the water-ice spectra, provided the ice is in the rings and not on the surface. Interestingly, another large Centaur, Chariklo, has a ring system, and similar changes are noted there (Duffard et al. 2014). If confirmed in Chiron, this suggests a paradigm shift, where rings may be commonly found around Centaurs and perhaps other large icy objects, like Kuiper Belt Objects, and rings need to be included as possible contributors to observed differences among KBOs. We note, however, that the Pluto system does not have any rings and the New Horizons project searched very thoroughly for them. So, while rings could be contributors, for some of our best examples of KBOs, rings are not present. The evidence is very strong for a model where most of Chiron's brightness changes are due to the changing orbital tilt of a ring system and nucleus rotation; however, these cannot explain the occasional outbursts and development of a coma. One possibility is that the – 17 – rings and coma may even be interdependent, as the most likely formation mechanism for the rings is proposed to be a debris disk fed by some cometary activity, with a possibility that in-falling material from the rings could trigger outbursts (Ruprecht et al. 2015). If instead of rings, Ruprecht et al. (2015) also raise the possibility that narrow jets may generate activity by a low-gravity analog to the geyser-like vents that are sometimes observed on Neptune's large satellite Triton or on Pluto, fueled by sub-surface geological activity. More observations are needed of Chiron, in and out of outburst, to confirm the rings or jets. Chiron's outbursts and coma occur at distances from the Sun too far to be caused by H2O and CO2 ice sublimation, the drivers of most normal comets near the Sun. Instead, the outgassing activity is probably largely due to the sublimation of even more volatile species. CO is the most likely candidate. Its emission in Chiron was singularly detected via the 1-0 rotational line in 1995 with production rates high enough to drive the observed dust coma (Womack & Stern 1999; Jewitt et al. 2008). The measured CO production rate indicates that much less than 1% of Chiron's surface was active in 1995, consistent with CO-driven vents or geysers. Occultation and thermal emission measurements indicated that Chiron has a very large diameter, ranging from D = 150 – 220 km (Campins et al. 1994; Elliot et al. 1995; Bus et al. 1996; Fern´andez 2000). Following the discussions by Groussin et al. (2004) and Fornasier et al. (2013), we recommend a diameter of DChiron=218±20 km, which we use for later calculations. Chiron's nucleus is clearly larger than those of Hale-Bopp and 29P, and significantly larger than most comet nuclei. Chiron has a low, but steady dust production rate of ∼ 0.5 kg s−1, with a mean speed of ∼ 100 m s−1 for a coma that is populated by 1-micron sized grains, according to analysis of near-infrared H- and R-band observations (Luu & Jewitt 1990). On the other hand, modeling of V-band images indicated that the coma was dominated by much larger – 18 – 100-micron sized dust grains that were largely un-sampled by the near-infrared data (West 1991; Fulle 1994; Romon-Martin et al. 2003). The larger grain sizes lead to a much higher mass loss rate of 20 ± 10 kg s−1, and slower dust expansion velocities of ∼ 5 to 10 m s−1. This is a very low dust production rate when compared to 29P or Hale-Bopp. Interestingly, Chiron's color temperature measurements are 40 - 50 K warmer than expected for its nucleus if one assumes an equilibrium temperature for a fast rotator spherical blackbody. It is not known whether the aforementioned ice is primarily crystalline or amorphous; however, the measured color temperature of the nucleus is high enough (125 - 140 K) to trigger the crystallization phase change (Campins et al. 1994). Unlike 29P, Chiron's nucleus rotation period is well determined to be 5.917813 ± 0.000007 hours (Marcialis & Buratti 1993). Information about Chiron's gas coma is scarce. Thus far, CN and CO are the only species seen in the coma, and both were detected only once (Bus et al. 1993; Womack & Stern 1999). The optical CN detection of ∼ 4 × 1025 mol s−1 at 11 AU correlates to a high production rate for a comet at 11 AU, and >4 times greater than Hale-Bopp at 10-12 AU (Rauer et al. 2003). Emission from CN was searched for when Chiron was near perihelion at ∼ 8.5 AU, and was not detected down to a limit that is ∼ 25% lower than what was observed at 11 AU (Rauer et al. 1997). Chiron was reported to be undergoing an outburst during both observing runs, so it is puzzling that CN was detected only once. Thus, the CN production in Chiron may be variable and not well-correlated with either the dust production rate or heliocentric distance. The millimeter-wavelength CO detection in Chiron is consistent with a production rate of ∼ 1028 mol s−1 at 8.5 AU (Womack & Stern 1999), which is also similar to Hale-Bopp at the same distance (Biver et al. 2002), see Figure 2. The observed CO line-width was very narrow and similar to what has been observed for 29P and Hale-Bopp. The CO line-width was FWHM = 0.39 km s−1; however, – 19 – the line was not resolved, and this should be considered an upper limit to the true spectral line-width. The narrow line width is indicative of emission from a cool gas, T < 110 K, and is also consistent with a dusty CO coma, in which dust heats gas in the near-nucleus region, resulting in terminal gas velocities of ∼ 0.4 km s−1 (Boice & Huebner 1993). An upper limit of Q(CO) < 2 × 1027 mol s−1 was obtained over five observing runs from Mar 1998 - Jul 2000, when Chiron was 9 - 11 AU (Bockel´ee-Morvan et al. 2001). This limit is almost ten times lower than the production rate measured several years earlier by Womack & Stern (1999). Hence, the CO detected in 1995 may have been the result of an outburst and not caused by any long-lived activity from Chiron, a conclusion also reached by Bockel´ee-Morvan et al. (2001). A detailed study by Fornasier et al. (2013) determined that a gas production rate of at least 1-10 × 1027 s−1 were needed to drive dust production rates derived from optical observations of the coma. This amount is consistent with the CO production rate measured at 8.5 AU and comparable to upper limits derived from ∼ 9=11 AU. Fornasier et al. (2013) also raise CO2 as capable of driving the observed dust activity. Unfortunately, there are no detections or upper limits to CO2 production rates in Chiron. The high color temperature of Chiron's nucleus and the CO and dust production rates are predicted by two models with a highly porous nucleus containing dust and gas-laden amorphous water ice with more volatile ices deeply buried (Prialnik et al. 1995; Capria et al. 2000). In these models, crystallization of amorphous ice in the nucleus is proposed to occur near the surface, which then releases the trapped CO gas. This may be the preferred mechanism, since at the surface temperature of Chiron (120K, see Campins et al. 1994) CO and CO2 ices would not survive shallower than a few skin depths (1 skin depth is ∼20 m, assuming a density of 0.7 g/cm3, see Prialnik et al. 2008). Thus, such solid ice phases of these volatile species can be ruled out as significant constituents of the top surface layers, – 20 – and are probably restricted to deeper sections of the nucleus. 4.3. Comet 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 Comet 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1's coma has been documented for 90 years. The comet appears to be nearly always active with numerous reports of dramatic outbursts of 4 to 8 magnitudes over relatively short time periods (e.g., Roemer 1958, 1962; Whipple 1980; Hughes 1991; Trigo-Rodr´ıguez et al. 2010). Originally classified as a short-period comet, it has a low inclination orbit, and its heliocentric distance ranges between 5.7 < r < 6.3 AU. Its current orbit is nearly circular (e = 0.04) and is relatively near the water ice sublimation zone. Dynamical studies show that 29P's orbit has become more circular over time, and it probably only recently transferred to this orbit from one much farther from the Sun, possibly the Kuiper Belt. It is often considered to have a Centaur orbit (e.g., Fernandez 1980; Stern 1989; Levison & Duncan 1994; Fernandez & Gallardo 1994). A recent study of 29P's nucleus radius derives R29P =30.2+3.7 −2.9 km (Schambeau et al. 2015), which we use for later calculations in this paper. This puts 29P at about the same size as Hale-Bopp and much smaller than Chiron. 29P's large asymmetrical dust coma often exceeds 400,000 km across, and spiral structures often seen in the coma are consistent with one or more active areas on the nucleus (Roemer 1958; Whipple 1980; Cochran et al. 1982; Reach et al. 2013a). Optical imaging techniques implied that the dust coma had a surface brightness profile (see Eq. 1) of s = −1 to −1.5 (Meech et al. 1993; Jewitt 1993), consistent with a steady-state, uniformly outgassing coma subject to some solar radiation pressure. Jewitt (1990) estimated a dust mass loss rate of 10 kg s−1 and dust expansion velocity of 200 m s−1 from images. However, this may be an underestimate of the total mass loss, since the reflected light is dominated by light scattered by grains with sizes comparable to the observed wavelength. As a result, this technique may undercount larger – 21 – grains, which probably play an important role in the comet's mass loss. One model of the grain size distributions indicates a much higher mass loss rate of ∼ 600 kg s−1 (Fulle 1992). CN is often the first emission feature detected in optical spectra of comets far from the Sun, so it was a surprise when CO+ was the first gaseous species seen in 29P (Cochran et al. 1980). CO+ emission in 29P was initially believed to be explained by photoionization of CO; however, the lifetime for this process at 29P's distance from the Sun (Larson 1980; Cochran & Cochran 1991) is too long to account for the observed column densities.3 Collisional ionization of CO from high energy solar wind electrons has been proposed, instead, to explain formation of the CO+ in 29P (see Cochran & Cochran 1991). CN was eventually detected in 29P in Dec 1989 with a line strength weaker than the neighboring CO+ lines (Cochran & Cochran 1991; Cook et al. 2005). The rotational period of 29P's nucleus is unknown, with measurements ranging from 14 hours to longer than two months (Miles 2016; Ivanova et al. 2015; Moreno 2009; Meech et al. 1993; Stansberry et al. 2004; Jewitt 1990; Whipple 1980). The large uncertainty in 29P's rotation period is a significant problem for constraining outgassing models. Since 29P's orbit has a very low eccentricity, the surface experiences a nearly constant rate of heat forcing (and cooling rate). Thus, the variations in illumination for any given patch on the surface are predominantly a function of period and obliquity. The co-latitude and co-longitude dependence drives the sub-surface activity (neglecting lateral heat conduction). The uniqueness of 29P's activity pattern may be the result of its relatively circular orbit 3The lifetime against photoionization for CO at 29P's distance ranges from 3 - 8 x107 sec, depending on the solar activity (Fox & Black 1989). At the average rate of 5 × 107 sec, CO molecules moving at 0.45 km s−1 away from the nucleus would travel ∼ 0.1 AU from the comet before being photoionized, which is well beyond the region where CO+ is observed (Festou et al. 2001). – 22 – and a non-simple spin state (possibly a very slow rotator with a highly oblique spin pole). The first direct evidence for a volatile that could generate a coma in 29P was the detection of CO gas (Senay & Jewitt 1994). A production rate of Q(CO) = 3.0 x 1028 molecules s−1 was derived, which corresponds to a mass loss rate of ∼ 2000 kg s−1. Since this is much greater than the dust mass loss rate of 10 - 600 kg s−1, it is assumed that CO is driving the observed activity. Upper limits of Q(CH4) < 1.3x1027 mol s−1 (< 5% of CO) were determined from infrared spectra of 29P (Paganini et al. 2013). Similarly, sensitive upper limits to CO2 emission show that this species is not dominant in 29P's coma with Q(CO2) < 80 Q(CO) (Ootsubo et al. 2012; Reach et al. 2013a; Bauer et al. 2015a). We conclude that N2, CH4 and CO2 are produced in minor amounts when compared to CO. Comet 29P seemingly always has at least a minimal CO production, of Q(CO) ∼ 3 × 1028 mol s−1, which is often referred to as the quiescent or non-outbursting state (Festou et al. 2001). Sporadic outbursts also occur which increase the comet's CO production by up to a factor of seven (see Figure 2), even though the comet's orbital distance does not change very much during this time. Clearly, CO outgassing is tied to the outbursting mechanism in 29P. Surprisingly, no correlations were found between observed CO+ emission and the outbursting state, as evidenced by optical observations of the coma. The production mechanism for CO+ in this comet is not clear (Cochran et al. 1980, 1982). Simultaneous observations of CO and CO+ are needed to better understand coma chemistry. The CO activity in 29P was proposed to be released from a relatively small active area on the surface by Senay & Jewitt (1994), either by sublimation of CO, or as trapped in water ice. However, detailed models of frozen CO sublimating (whether pure or adsorbed onto water ice) does not reproduce the observations well (i.e. Enzian et al. 1997) and the surface is too warm for CO ice to survive for very long. Different models exist that – 23 – incorporate energy provided by HCN polymerization and the crystallization of amorphous water ice (Gronkowski & Smela 1998) or melting and dissolution of gases (Miles 2016); however, they do not include a full account of the energetics, so these models are of limited value. Moreover, the dust outflow velocities predicted are approximately three times lower than what was measured from HST WFPC2 imaging data (Feldman et al. 1996). The model which best explains the CO production rates to date is one that includes crystallization of amorphous water ice with trapped CO gas and pockets of CO ice, a highly tilted rotation axis and surface erosion (Enzian et al. 1997). In this model, CO production primarily comes from release as a trapped gas when crystallization occurs in amorphous ice in the sub-solar area. This model also explains outbursts with surface erosion where dust grains are released from the ice-dust matrix by the escaping gas. Further clues about the physical state of the coma are given by the millimeter and infrared spectra of CO. The CO spectral line shapes in 29P (in both the quiescent and outbursting states) are frequently characterized by two very narrow (FWHM line-width ∼ 0.10 to 0.15 km s−1) velocity components, which are found at ∼ +0.5 km s−1 and -0.3 km s−1 with respect to the cometocentric velocity (Crovisier et al. 1995; Biver et al. 1997a; Festou et al. 2001; Gunnarsson et al. 2002, see Figure 3). Two emitting regions have been proposed to explain the double-peaked (red and blue-shifted) CO line profile: a day-side and night-side region (Crovisier et al. 1995). In contrast, the two peaks are interpreted by (Crifo et al. 1999) as due to temperature distributions on the surface, and not the spatial location of vents. Still another idea is that the line-shape may be partly due to under-sampling the CO emitting region, which would preferentially detect the gas with the greatest Doppler shifts (Festou et al. 2001). Finally, the two lines could be caused by two different sources of CO: a nuclear and an extended source originating from icy grains in the coma (Gunnarsson et al. 2002). – 24 – Raster (point-by-point) mapping data with the SEST 15-m telescope indicated that there was a substantial secondary source of CO in the coma, which was hypothesized as being due to the release of CO from icy grains in the coma in 29P (Festou et al. 2001; Gunnarsson et al. 2002). In this scenario, the sunward emission from the nucleus gives a strong blue-shifted peak, and the isotropic emission of the extended source gives a so-called "horned" appearance due to under-sampling of the icy grain emission source by the radio beam. The blue-shifted part of the "horn" is blended with the sunward peak. With this model, the extended source produces ∼ 3 times the amount of CO as the nuclear source and is the dominant source of CO emission. Subsequent mapping of CO emission with the IRAM 30-m dish did not show evidence for such a widespread secondary source (Gunnarsson et al. 2008). However, the data showed an asymmetric localized feature in the coma with "excess emission. This is evident in both the dust and gas comae and extends 0.5 to 2 arcminutes south of the nucleus (Schambeau et al. 2015; Gunnarsson et al. 2008), which corresponds to a projected distance starting at ∼ 1.1 × 105 km from the nucleus (we find that the published number in Gunnarsson et al. (2008) is too high by a factor of ten). This is sometimes also referred to as a jet feature. Thus, it is possible that 29P split off a smaller piece or fragment during 2003 - 2004. Interestingly, CO emission was detected from both the main and fragment sources by Gunnarsson et al. (2008). The fragment was found to have a slightly smaller blueshift (-0.18 km/s) than the main nucleus component (-0.35 km/s). The spectral line profile of the secondary also showed the classic horned appearance, consistent with the spectra obtained at the primary position. Follow-up high angular resolution spectral mapping, or interferometry, would be invaluable for studying this "excess emission" phenomenon in 29P. The true nature of this enhanced CO emission region in the coma is not known. A long lasting, but largely hidden, fragment or secondary component could be an important – 25 – additional source of CO in 29P's coma (Gunnarsson et al. 2008). A secondary component would also complicate efforts to measure the rotation period of the main nucleus, which has so far remained undetermined. We note that 174P/Echeclus, another Centaur that is sometimes active, reportedly had a distinct secondary source, which may have recently split from the primary nucleus (Rousselot 2008; Fern´andez 2009). This secondary extended emission in Echeclus was at a similar distance from the nucleus: the angular separation is a factor of ∼ 3 times, and the derived spatial separation is ∼ 1.5 times that of 29P's excess emission (calculated from Rousselot 2008; Gunnarsson et al. 2008) using the correct distance (see previous paragraph). Processes acting at 29P may be similar to those at Chiron, the other Centaur in this study, producing secondaries and rings. Infrared and millimeter wavelength spectra also showed that the CO inner coma gas in 29P is at an extraordinarily low rotational temperature of ∼ 5K (Gunnarsson et al. 2008; Paganini et al. 2013), making it one of the coldest gases known in the the solar system. As discussed in Gunnarsson et al. (2002); Paganini et al. (2013), if CO molecules start out from the nucleus with Trot ∼ 5K, they will change excitation conditions over time and reach fluorescence equilibrium within ∼ 2 days. Therefore, many millimeter wavelength observations with larger beamwidths are recording spectra from molecules which are close to fluorescence equilibrium with a higher rotational temperature of 10-15K. 29P's coma is predicted to have a significant amount of water due to the sublimation of icy grains, if water ice is present at the surface and if grains are ejected (Crifo et al. 1999). Initially, searches showed no water down to a limit of Q(OH) < 2-3 × 1028 mol s−1 (Cochran & Cochran 1991; Feldman et al. 1996). 29P was observed with the Herschel Space Observatory, and preliminary results claim a detection of water and HCN with line profiles that are consistent with being emitted from icy grains in the coma, but no values – 26 – have been published yet for the production rates (Bockelee-Morvan et al. 2010, 2014). 5. Discussion and Comparison of Distantly Active Comets In this section, we review the similarities and differences in the observational data of Hale-Bopp, 29P and Chiron, and discuss the models that best fit these data. We focus on the spectroscopic results, mainly production rates and line profile characteristics. Representative production rates of important species in 29P, Chiron and Hale-Bopp are summarized in Table 2. In particular, we 1) examine the production rate ratios of CN/CO (and HCN/CO) and 2) CO2/CO, 3) discuss clues from spectral line profiles of volatile species, and 4) recalculate CO production rates for all 3 comets with consistent modeling assumptions. We then 5) summarize observational constraints to models of distant activity and 6) analyze Q(CO) for all three objects when adjusted for nucleus size and heliocentric distance. 5.1. Production Rate Ratios: CN/CO and HCN/CO CN and CO are the only gaseous species observed in all three comets, and we briefly compare their relative production rates to test models of CN and HCN in comae and to assess whether HCN is a likely competitor for triggering activity in these objects. Using values from Jewitt et al. (1996); Fitzsimmons & Cartwright (1996); Rauer et al. (1997); Biver et al. (2002), we calculate that the ratio Q(CN)/Q(CO) was ∼ 0.003 in Hale-Bopp at ∼ 6.8 AU pre-perihelion, and the same value at 4.6 AU post-perihelion (see Table 3). We derive the ratio Q(HCN)/Q(CO) ∼ 0.004 at 6 AU post-perihelion using values from Rauer et al. (1997); Biver et al. (2002). Interestingly, Q(HCN)/Q(CO) ∼ Q(CN)/Q(CO), even at somewhat different heliocentric distances. This is consistent – 27 – with work by Rauer et al. (2003); Fray et al. (2005); Bockel´ee-Morvan et al. (2008), which conclude that Hale-Bopp's CN largely originated from HCN photolysis. Additionally, it is clear that HCN was produced in much smaller amounts than CO in Hale-Bopp at large heliocentric distances, and thus does not compete with CO in triggering activity. Unfortunately, it is not clear what the CN/CO production rate ratio is for Chiron, because CN and CO were not measured at the same time. However, if we use the CN value at 11 AU and CO measurement at 8.5 AU, we get a similarly low value of Q(CN)/Q(CO) ∼ 0.003. However, we stress that these were not simultaneous measurements for Chiron, and hence the ratio is probably of limited value. CN is only rarely observed in 29P and, when seen, it appears depleted with respect to CO, when compared to Hale-Bopp, which we use as a proxy for an unprocessed new comet. Using the CN production rate from Cochran & Cochran (1991) and the average non-outbursting value of Q(CO) ∼ 3 × 1028 for 29P, we calculate a production rate ratio Q(CN)/Q(CO) ∼ 0.0003, which is almost ten times lower than what is derived for Hale-Bopp at 4 and 6 AU. By this metric, 29P appears to have much less CN (and presumably HCN) than CO when compared to Hale-Bopp and possibly also Chiron. As mentioned previously, 29P was observed with the Herschel Space Observatory, and preliminary results claim detections of H2O and HCN (Bockelee-Morvan et al. 2010, 2014). Once HCN production rates are published from these Herschel data, they will be useful for comparing with measured CO and CN production rates to test models of release of all three species from the nucleus (McKay et al. 2012). It will be also interesting to see whether the Herschel data support CN arising from HCN in 29P. The relative amounts of HCN and CO produced from 29P could provide clues to the comet's formation environment. For example, if HCN and CO are both incorporated into amorphous ice, and if the cometary material was predominantly from regions where CO was more likely to be adsorbed onto forming – 28 – grains of amorphous water ice, then HCN depletion would indicate Kuiper Belt formation distances, rather than closer-in Saturn distances. 5.2. Production Rate Ratios: CO2/CO Another important marker in comae is the relative amount of CO2 and CO, which is a useful test of thermal evolution and/or formation models (Feldman et al. 1997a; Belton & Melosh 2009; A'Hearn et al. 2012). Although recent surveys show that CO2 >> CO for most comets (Ootsubo et al. 2012; Reach et al. 2013b; Bauer et al. 2015b), CO drives the activity for Hale-Bopp (beyond 4 AU) and 29P. Indeed, these two comets appear to be "CO-rich" when compared to most other comets. CO2 was directly detected in Hale-Bopp's coma at 4.3 microns using the Infrared Space Observatory at 4.6 AU pre-perihelion and 4.9 AU post-perihelion (Crovisier 1997). CO2 was also indirectly detected in Hale-Bopp with similar values via CO Cameron band emission. These CO bands predominantly arise from CO2 dissociation (Weaver et al. 1997) but also have contributions from electron impact excitation of CO (Bhardwaj & Raghuram 2011). CO2 production rates can be measured via high spectral resolution ground-based observations of O[I] when cometary and telluric emission is significantly separated by Doppler shift (McKay et al. 2012; Raghuram & Bhardwaj 2014; Decock et al. 2015), but this technique was not used on Chiron, Hale-Bopp or 29P. Using directly measured CO and CO2 production rates at approximately the same time from the literature, we calculate production rate ratios of Q(CO2)/Q(CO) ∼ 0.1-0.3 for Hale-Bopp between 4-5 AU (Table 4). Searches for CO2 in 29P yielded upper limits of Q(CO2)/Q(CO) ∼ 0.01 (Ootsubo et al. 2012; Reach et al. 2013a), roughly ten times lower than for Hale-Bopp at ∼ 6 AU. Clearly, at these large heliocentric distances, CO2 is not a significant driver for activity in either Hale-Bopp or 29P. Interestingly, the Hale-Bopp and 29P Q(CO2)/Q(CO) ratios are – 29 – significantly lower than what is reported for many other periodic or dynamically new comets Feldman et al. (1997b); A'Hearn et al. (2012); Bauer et al. (2015b); Reach et al. (2013b); Ootsubo et al. (2012). It is important to note that most of these measurements of other comets were obtained at heliocentric distances of 1 to 2.5 AU, which is much closer to the Sun than the CO2 measurements in 29P and Hale-Bopp. It is possible that the production rate ratios of CO2 and CO vary in distance from the Sun for an individual comet. The production rate ratios may not reflect the nucleus abundances, but rather the activity mechanism dominant at the time of observations. For example, at 29P's distance from the Sun, the effective surface temperature (black-body) is roughly 120 K, which straddles the threshold for water ice amorphous-crystalline transition. Due to differences in volatility (sublimation pressures and rates), released CO will immediately flow outside, while released CO2 would diffuse in the nucleus and may even re-condense at various depths. The presence of ice and clathrate reservoirs, for CO2 and CO, could introduce alternative pathways. However, the location of these components will have to be very close to the surface, within ∼1 skin depth, in order to match the quiescent activity of 29P. Indeed, the measured Q(CO2)/Q(CO) ratio increased as Hale-Bopp approached the Sun, which may be partly due to higher sublimation temperature for CO2 (see Table 1) being reached by the comet. As part of a large infrared survey of comets that included 9 comets beyond 4 AU, Kelley et al. (2013) calculated each comet's efρ, which is a quantity used to approximate the dust production rate. The study showed that log Q(CO2)/ǫfρ broke into two groups of behavior for comets inside and outside 4 AU (see Figure 9 in Bauer et al. (2015b)). The authors of that survey suggest that within 4 AU, CO2 activity may be endogenic with the dust. This may be attributable to different source regions (surface versus sub-surface) for cometary CO2 and CO emissions. Further searches for CO and CO2 emission from other distantly active comets are needed to test models of volatile production. Hale-Bopp and 29P appear to be CO-rich comets. – 30 – 5.3. Spectral Line Profiles Additional information is contained in spectral line profiles about how gas is emitted from a comet nucleus. For example, consider that the millimeter wavelength spectral line profiles of CO for Hale-Bopp (when beyond 4 AU), 29P and Chiron are all very narrow (< 0.5 km/s), and sometimes are blue shifted by a small amount, ∼ 0.3-0.5 km s−1. The numerical values of the velocity shifts are consistent with CO escaping from the nucleus at velocities corresponding to hydrodynamical escape for v ∼ 0.4 km s−1 (Festou et al. 2001; Gunnarsson et al. 2003). The spectra's blue-shifts indicate that the CO molecules' velocity vector is primarily toward the Sun (and hence, the Earth, due to typically small phase angles), and the emission can be understood if it occurs on the sunward side of the nucleus. Such narrow lines indicate a narrow distribution of fluxes coming off the nucleus, which in turn probably indicates a singular source for the CO, at least in terms of the temperature and depth. There is a narrow range of thermal velocities that the CO molecules experience, once released, and there is a specific length scale that these molecules traverse before leaving the surface. Sublimation from an icy grain halo is expected when an active comet is ∼ 4-6 AU from the Sun. This occurred in Hale-Bopp's coma at ∼ 5 AU from the Sun, and there is strong evidence that this develops in 29P and around other comets, such as Bowell, at 5 AU. This is the likely origin of most of the CH3OH, OH, HCN, H2CO and H2S emission in Hale-Bopp beyond 4 AU, as is illustrated in Figure 1. Interestingly, as Hale-Bopp moved closer to the Sun (from 5 to 4 AU) the linewidths of methanol increased from ∼ 1 to 2 km s−1, while the CO linewidths remained relatively constant, which further illustrates the differing behavior for CO and CH3OH at large heliocentric distances (Womack et al. 1997). – 31 – 5.4. A Consistent Set of CO Production Rates Production rates for CO in these objects were published previously by several groups over 20 years with different models and assumptions, including Senay & Jewitt (1994); Crovisier et al. (1995); Womack et al. (1997); Womack & Stern (1999); Biver et al. (2002); Gunnarsson et al. (2003); Paganini et al. (2013); DiSanti et al. (1999). Differences in observing and modeling techniques make it difficult to assess similarities and differences of the production rates among the comets. In order to better compare the CO production, and probe the importance of nucleus size and thermal history, we derived the CO production rates using our own data for Hale-Bopp, 29P and Chiron in a consistent manner. The data for Hale-Bopp and Chiron were previously published using simpler models (Womack et al. 1997; Womack & Stern 1999). Most of the data for 29P are new and were obtained during 2016 Feb to May using the Arizona Radio Observatory 10-m Submillimeter Telescope (SMT)(Wierzchos et al., in preparation). The 29P CO data are part of a separate project and a full analysis will be published later. For now, we present the dates, heliocentric distances and derived production rates in Table 5. One additional data point for 29P was taken from Graham & Womack (1995). We assumed isotropic outgassing of CO from the nucleus, rotational and excitation temperatures of Biver et al. (2002) and expansion velocities from Gunnarsson et al. (2008). The excitation model includes both collisional and fluorescence excitation in a manner similar to Crovisier & Le Bourlot 1983 and Biver (1997). Applying a cone ejection model would reduce the numbers in Figure 2 by 40%, but would not otherwise change the results. In Figure 2, we plot the new CO production rates for Hale-Bopp, 29P and Chiron. The Hale-Bopp and 29P production rates are comparable to values derived by Gunnarsson et al. (2003, 2008). In Figure 2 we also include Q(CO) values for Hale-Bopp taken from Gunnarsson et al. (2003), to extend the heliocentric range for Hale-Bopp; these values were not recalculated, because they used the same modeling parameters as our new model. The upper limit for Chiron was taken from Drahus et al. – 32 – (2016). The Hale-Bopp CO production rates in Figure 2 are all pre-perihelion and follow the relationship Q(CO) = 3.5 × 1029r−2.2 molecules/second, where r is heliocentric distance in astronomical units (AU). This heliocentric dependence agrees with what was found by (Biver et al. 2002) for pre-perihelion data of Hale-Bopp. Later post-perihelion observations of the comet out to ∼ 11 AU showed that Q(CO) followed a slightly less steep r−2 dependence (Biver et al. 2002; Gunnarsson et al. 2003). The pre-perihelion slope is steeper than one would expect for a mechanism driven solely by insolation, which would produce a r−2 dependence. The steeper slope may indicate that there is an additional source of energy in this regime, such as crystallization of water ice. Based on the discussion and analysis of Gunnarsson et al. (2003), we extrapolated the Q(CO) relationship for Hale-Bopp out to 11 AU, assuming an r−2 dependence to indicate the likely CO production rates at larger heliocentric distances. When adjusted for heliocentric distance, CO production rates in three distantly active comets are remarkably uniform, despite different thermal processing histories (long-period vs. Centaurs) and different nucleus sizes. We explore the apparently similar CO production rates in the next section. 5.5. Observational Constraints to Existing Models of Distant Activity The models that best explain the quiescent activity of Hale-Bopp and 29P are similar. A porous comet nucleus comprising a mixture of ices and grains with a dust mantle at the surface best fits the data obtained so far (e.g., Enzian et al. 1997; Enzian 1999; Capria et al. 2002). In these models, crystallization of amorphous water ice near the surface and subsequent release of trapped CO molecules is the dominant cause of activity for 29P – 33 – and Hale-Bopp within 7 AU. Activity in Hale-Bopp beyond 8 AU is more likely caused by sublimation of near-surface CO ice, since the heating rate is too low for crystallization to proceed in any appreciable rate. The survival of near-surface CO ice may be aided by the low thermal conductivity maintained in very porous surface layers. Existing in-situ measurements of comet nuclei point to a highly-porous bulk, as for the Rosetta and Deep Impact measurements of comets 67P and 9P, respectively (Sierks et al. 2015, A'Hearn et al. 2005). However, a porosity gradient has been inferred for 67P (from the CONSERT sounding experiment), with an upper limit on near-surface porosity of 30In any case there should exist a long-term reservoir for highly-volatile species, such as CO. The distinction between the effects of an amorphous/crystalline water ice phase and a gradient in layering and insulation falls outside the scope of this work and will be pursued by systematic modeling efforts. Moreover, the CO emission in 29P and Hale-Bopp has sunward velocity shifts at large heliocentric distances. This implies that the CO released by both methods (sublimation of CO ice and release of trapped CO during the crystallization of water ice) occurs from the sub-solar regions of the nuclei. For Chiron, the surface temperatures are too warm for solid CO or CO2 to be near the surface and sublimate, so instead, crystallization of water ice and release of trapped gases is the more likely model (Prialnik et al. 1995; Capria et al. 2000). A high obliquity for the rotation axis would allow Chiron's sub-solar regions to be heated enough by the Sun to reach the measured color temperatures, which is also high enough for crystallization to occur. These models also reproduce the quiescent dust production rates of the comets. However, we note that recent spacecraft data have revealed how geologically diverse comets are. This surface geology and morphology evolution and the connection to the sub-surface layers are a function of both origin and evolution. Thus, it is not just the specific – 34 – diffusivity and conductivity of the icy and silicate components, but also the configurations, mixing ratios and dynamics of the different constituents that become important. Since comets are significantly porous (e.g., Patzold et al. 2016; A'Hearn et al. 2011, 2005), the way the porous medium evolves together with compositional and structural changes (phase transitions, gas flow, cavities, small impacts, out-gassing) affects the determination of bulk transport properties. Models of these interactions are inherently susceptible to some degeneracy in the choice of parameters. The more chemical and physical information we have about the nucleus and the behavior of the coma at various distances, the better we can constrain the modeled profiles and compositions. Gaseous outbursts can be explained if a region unusually rich in CO ice sublimates when exposed to the Sun, or if a crystallization burst of water ice occurs. Either process will cause an increase in CO and dust production (if there is much dust in that region). Therefore, large dust jets emerge from cracks in the surface after being triggered by a gaseous outburst, while the bulk of the observed CO (that generates the quiescent activity) percolates through the comet surface that is at or near the sub-solar spot. Outbursts in 29P, in particular, are possibly triggered by surface erosion of the dust mantle (Enzian et al. 1997). For Chiron, sublimation of CO ice pockets is not likely, since, as discussed previously, the surface temperatures are too warm for CO ice to be present. Instead, amorphous water ice crystallization bursts are considered to be the most likely cause of outbursts for Chiron. The mechanisms proposed to explain the distant activity in Hale-Bopp, 29P and Chiron are possible in any comet which contains amorphous ice with trapped CO gas, as well as frozen CO in their nuclei, as long as these materials are sufficiently near the surface to be heated to the crystallization and/or sublimation temperatures. One might wonder why most comets are not reported to be active until within 3 AU of the Sun. One possibility is that most short-period comets exhausted their reservoirs of CO (and other – 35 – supervolatile ice) and converted their amorphous ice to the crystalline phase many millions (or even billions) of years ago. Any remaining frozen CO and amorphous ice is too deeply buried to be heated above the crystallization and sublimation temperatures during their orbits. Another important point is that the nuclei of Hale-Bopp, 29P and Chiron are larger than those of most typical comets, and this is probably responsible for much of the distant activity. The larger volume exposes more material to heating, which provides more opportunities for sublimation and crystallization. Some smaller, long-period comets may exhibit CO production beyond 3 AU, but the quantities are too low to be detected with current equipment. Orbital history is thought to play a role in devolatilizing comet nuclei. Hale-Bopp's orbit places it in the long-period comet category, which means it has experienced few heating cycles over its lifetime, especially when compared to Chiron and 29P. It is dynamically young and has probably experienced very different perihelion/aphelion evolution than low-inclination bodies in the outer solar system (Bailey et al. 1996). As such, the reservoirs of volatile species in the nucleus have been processed in a different manner and could have remained more accessible to subsequent apparition. Large gas fluxes from previously untapped reservoirs of volatile species, which can efficiently entrain and drag dust grains from various depths in the nucleus, could have been the main source of the distinctive brightness of Hale-Bopp. The highly-volatile nature of the gas (and perhaps larger abundances of CO) may have been the main cause for very distant activity, both pre- and post-perihelion. 29P orbits much closer to the Sun, at r ∼ 6 AU, and thermal evolution from previous orbits probably depleted any highly-volatile solid ice from at least the first 100 or so meters. Accessible solid ice layers are probably rare, and thus not the main driver of activity for 29P. This is also probably true, to some extent, for Chiron, which orbits between 8.5 - 13 AU. By this measure alone, Hale-Bopp should have produced significantly more CO than 29P or Chiron. However, as Figure 2 shows, the CO production rates are – 36 – consistent between the comets. 29P produces CO at approximately the same rate as was observed in Hale-Bopp when it was at r ∼ 6 AU. Hale-Bopp's and 29P's very different orbital histories appear not to be reflected in their CO production rates at 6 AU. Chiron is a little more complicated to sort out. The CO emission detection in Chiron at 8.5 AU is consistent with the CO production rate in Hale-Bopp at about the same heliocentric distance post-perihelion. However, it is important to keep in mind that other searches for CO in Chiron led to upper limits which were significantly lower than the detection, which presumably occurred during an outburst. The non-detection limit made over two years implies that if Chiron does continually emit CO, it is likely at a much lower rate than Hale-Bopp or 29P. Dust production rates estimated from optical-infrared images are also consistent with significantly lower activity overall compared to Hale-Bopp at this distance (Romon-Martin et al. 2003; Weiler et al. 2003). Given the low dust production rates, Chiron is not likely to be outgassing significant amounts of another volatile, such as CO2. The Chiron data are consistent with very little constant volatile outgassing punctuated by sporadic outbursts. Although Hale-Bopp's long orbital period means that it is substantially less heated/processed than short-period comets, it has endured several passages near the Sun, which may be evident in comparisons with a true dynamically new comet, making its first perihelion approach. Detailed comparisons of observations of Hale-Bopp with such dynamically new comets at large distances would be very useful and should be encouraged. Currently, very few direct comparisons are possible beyond ∼ 2 AU, but one recently studied dynamically new comet, C/2009 P1 Garradd, showed a striking difference. Garradd did not show the strong correlation between CO activity and heliocentric distance as Hale-Bopp. Rather than show a symmetric increase and decrease of CO around perihelion, Garradd's CO production continued to increase throughout the entire time period that could be studied, out to ∼ 2-3 AU post-perihelion (Feaga et al. 2014; McKay et al. 2015). – 37 – Unfortunately, observations of CO emission beyond 4 AU do not exist for comet Garradd. It would be particularly valuable to compare CO behavior for these two classes of comets when they are beyond the water-ice sublimation limit. Also, closer to the Sun, CO may be produced in significant amounts as daughter products from parent species. Such competing sources for CO production near the Sun complicates efforts to account for how much CO is natal and driving the long-term activity. Of the three objects discussed in this paper, two that have very different orbital histories (29P and Hale-Bopp) and thus should have very different CO production rates, in fact have very similar CO production rates. In addition, two which are classified as Centaurs with relatively close-in orbits (29P and Chiron) are expected to produce similar amounts of CO had they started with similar compositions. However, they have vastly different CO production rates. This is a very small sample set, obviously, but from studying these three objects we conclude that orbital history alone cannot explain the CO production rates in these objects. Further constraining measurements of CO emission from other Centaurs are needed to explore the role CO outgassing plays in Centaurs. 5.6. CO Output Adjusted For Nucleus Size A comet's size is also expected to be correlated with how productive it is when it is heated by the Sun. For larger objects, once amorphous ice starts transitioning, triggered by small increases in temperature (from insolation, impacts, chemical reactions, etc.), it will depend only on the heat wave coming in from the surface. This heat wave is just a function of heliocentric distance, if we assume all other properties are similar (material, porosity, distribution, etc.). Larger comets are more susceptible to radiogenic heating, which may lead to – 38 – devolatilization of the original ice. As discussed earlier, comets smaller than 10 km probably have their initial temperature preserved deeper than about 100 meters. However, 29P, Chiron and Hale-Bopp all have radii larger than 10 km, and so probably experienced some amount of radiogenic heating. Chiron is much larger than 29P and Hale-Bopp and so probably underwent even more radiogenic heating (unless 29P and Hale-Bopp are fragments of larger objects). Consequently, on the basis of size, one might expect Chiron to be more processed, and thus have less outgassing than 29P or Hale-Bopp. On the other hand, if one assumes comet nuclei to be roughly heterogeneous, then bigger comets should have higher outputs when heated. CO emission was searched for, and not found, in a collection of KBO's and Centaurs by Bockel´ee-Morvan et al. (2001); Jewitt et al. (2008); Drahus et al. (2016). Many of the Centaurs were first observed by Bockel´ee-Morvan et al. (2001) and Jewitt et al. (2008) and then re-analyzed by Drahus et al. (2016), who also made new observations. The authors of the first survey proposed that if the objects' CO activity followed the trend of Hale-Bopp's gas activity with heliocentric distance, and is proportional to the object's diameter, D, then the relationship Q(CO) ∼ r−2 × D2 should hold, and CO should have been detected in these very distant objects. The upper limits they obtained are significantly below what would be predicted from this simple scaling law, which they conclude is evidence that that these objects underwent significant CO devolatilization since their formation (De Sanctis et al. 2001b). The authors of the second survey drew the same conclusions about Centaurs likely being depleted in CO using similar arguments, whereas the third survey raised the question of whether CO outgassing should be correlated with heliocentric distance or size, but instead a small heliocentric distance might be more important. 29P is a notable exception to the list of apparently CO-depleted Centaurs, and its nearly circular orbit has a relatively small heliocentric distance of ∼ 6 AU. – 39 – To explore this further, we calculated CO "specific production rates," which are the production rates divided by the square of the nucleus diameter. Specific production rates were calculated for Hale-Bopp, 29P and Chiron using CO production rates from Figure 2. Note that the Chiron upper limit at ∼ 9.5 AU is from Drahus et al. (2016), which they recalculated using Bockel´ee-Morvan et al. (2001) data. The specific production rates are plotted in Figure 4. Accordingly, Chiron is approximately 5-15 times depleted in CO when compared to Hale-Bopp, a proxy for a relatively unprocessed comet.4 We do not have our own Hale-Bopp data at 8-10 AU, and hence we extrapolated Q(CO) from the r−2 fit to the Q(CO) data, which is also consistent with Q(CO) values from Gunnarsson et al. (2003). We conclude that there is measurably less CO produced per surface area from Chiron than either Hale-Bopp or 29P. This is consistent with radiogenic heating devolatilization being an important parameter in nucleus modeling, since Chiron is much larger than either of the other two comets. As discussed in the previous section, Hale-Bopp and 29P have very similar CO production rates, even when corrected for nucleus size. We see no evidence for devolatilization for 29P when compared to Hale-Bopp; in fact, when outbursting, 29P outproduces Hale-Bopp by almost a factor of ten. This may point to 29P being a more recent entrant to the inner solar system than Chiron. Since Chiron does not get closer than ∼ 8.5 AU, where Tbb ∼ 100K, it can maintain a 4A similar calculation was performed by Bockel´ee-Morvan et al. (2001) and found Chiron to be depleted by a factor of ∼ 35 with respect to Hale-Bopp. This difference in depletion values can be largely explained by different values used for Hale-Bopp's nucleus diameter, D, and CO production rate at 8-9 AU. For example, Bockel´ee-Morvan et al. (2001) assumed D=40 km diameter (we use 60 km) and they used an older CO production rate value for Hale-Bopp that was later updated by Gunnarsson et al. (2003), which we also use. – 40 – slow crystallization rate of ∼ 1000 years (and rate of trapped volatile release), if we assume maximum efficiency. Perhaps Chiron never experienced large temperature excursions to its surface, since the perihelion was never much inside of its current one. However, by considering the noted higher color temperature and low CO production rate, we find it consistent with Chiron's being appreciably devolatilized over a fresher object like Hale-Bopp. Also, Chiron's interior may be warmer due to early radiogenic heating and slow cooling rates, as it is a larger object than both Hale-Bopp and 29P. 6. Conclusions All Hale-Bopp, 29P and Chiron have in common that: 1) They exhibit long-term quiescent activity beyond 4 AU that is punctuated by sporadic outbursts; 2) Emission from CN and CO was seen in their coma; 3) The CO line profiles were narrow, ∆v(FWHM) ∼ 0.3-0.5 km s−1; 4) They have spent most of their lifetime far from the Sun;5 5) They have larger-than-usual nuclei. There are notable differences among the comets, including: 1) The CO emission had blue-shifted velocity components of ∼ -0.4 km/s (sunward) for 29P and Hale-Bopp, but almost no shift for Chiron's emission; 2) CO was seen only once in Chiron, but was repeatedly observable for long-term study in Hale-Bopp and 29P (and 29P is observable, even now); 3) Hale-Bopp had much higher dust production rates than seen in 29P or Chiron. Sublimation or escape of molecules from a grain halo at ∼ 5-6 AU appears to be a 5Chiron and 29P have only recently entered their current orbits and may be precursors to Jupiter Family comets (Fernandez & Gallardo 1994), and Hale-Bopp has an aphelion of ∼ 360 AU, spends most of its time at very large heliocentric distances. – 41 – typical development in distantly active comets, and may be the main source of emission of OH, HCN, CH3OH, H2CO, and H2S in Hale-Bopp between 3 – 6 AU. This may also explain the origin of OH and CN molecules in other distant comets. Spectral line profiles and spatial mapping should be used whenever possible to determine a nuclear or extended origin for volatiles in distant comets. Observed radio line profiles are consistent with the development and sublimation of icy grains in the coma at about 5-6 AU, and this is probably a common feature in distantly active comets, and an important source of other volatiles within 5 AU. Note that narrow CO line profiles for all three main bodies in this study indicate a nuclear origin for CO beyond ∼ 4 AU, and not an extended source, as with these other molecular cases. Our calculated CN/CO and CO2/CO production rate ratios for Hale-Bopp and 29P show that HCN and CO2 were both produced in significantly smaller amounts than CO, and can only be minor contributors to distant activity of these two objects. For Chiron, no limits exist for CO2 emission, and CN and CO were both detected only once at the ∼ 3.5σ level. The CN measurements are consistent with HCN being an insignificant contributor to Chiron's coma. The CO data correspond to a gas production rate high enough to drive the observed dust coma activity; however, the CO detected may have also resulted from an outburst and we cannot rule out significant contributions from undetected CO2 or other supervolatile gases. We point out that the CN/CO production rate ratios that we derive from the literature are remarkably similar in all three distantly active comets, which warrants follow-up study. When adjusted for heliocentric distance, our analysis shows that CO production rates in three distantly active comets are remarkably uniform, despite different thermal processing histories (long-period vs. Centaurs) and different nucleus sizes. Specific CO production rates, Q(CO)/D2, were calculated in order to take into account nucleus size, – 42 – which is predicted to play a large role in cometary activity. We find that orbital history does not appear to play a significant role in explaining the CO production rates for 29P and Hale-Bopp, which confirms the conclusion in A'Hearn et al. (2012) for comets within 2 AU. 29P outproduces Hale-Bopp at the same heliocentric distance, although it has been subjected to solar heating far longer, and models predict it should have been devolatilized over a fresher comet, like Hale-Bopp. However, we may see evidence for the relevance of nucleus size when considering specific production rates. If CO is present in Chiron's coma on a long-term basis, it must be in relatively small amounts and consistent with a CO depletion by at least 5-15 times over Hale-Bopp, perhaps due to increased radiogenic heating made possible by its much larger size or its higher processing due to orbital history. The model which best reproduces the distant activity of 29P and Hale-Bopp is a comet nucleus composed of dust, amorphous water ice and smaller amounts of trapped CO and CO2 trapped in the amorphous ice and a build-up of a thin porous dust mantle (Prialnik 1997a,b). Within ∼ 4 - 7 AU, the water ice undergoes crystallization near the surface and releases trapped gases and dust. There is a large range of free parameters in the models. The spin state and specific porous medium properties play a large role in the differences in activity between comets. The release of CO and subsequent permeability of the gas flow could inhibit emission, especially if the local temperature (and pressure) gradients vary. This variation could be a strong function of solar radiation heating and surface cooling, which are functions of the spin state and surface morphology. Since Rosetta, the latter has become an increasingly important factor (Thomas et al. 2015). Models for Chiron's distant activity are presented in Prialnik et al. (1995); Capria et al. (2000); Fanale & Salvail (1997). The first two include amorphous ice and rely on release of trapped CO, while the latter starts with a layered model of dust mantle, thick water ice layer and CO layer underneath. The amorphous ice models better reproduce the distant activity, – 43 – although they are constrained by a lack of observations of CO and dust production. The latter is a convolution of gas fluxes, dust properties and coma behavior. Models dominated by crystalline water ice and CO/CO2 ices are not successful (Prialnik et al. 1995). Instead, Chiron's activity appears to be best explained by a release of trapped volatile species in the water ice matrix. However, a more complete understanding of the outburst or quiescent nature of this activity would require more measurements of CO production rates, at different times. An optimal addition would be observations of other species (e.g., methanol, methane, CO2 , etc.), which would enable more stringent constraints on the nucleus' composition ratios and thermal history. Radiogenic heating may be important for explaining Chiron's low-level activity that appears CO-depleted. Furthermore, if rings are confirmed around Chiron, then previously reported long-term changes in visual magnitude and infrared spectral ice features should be re-examined. 7. Acknowledgements The authors thank the anonymous referee for useful comments and feedback, which improved the paper. This material is based upon work supported by (while MW was serving at) the National Science Foundation (NSF). MW also acknowledges support from NSF grants AST-1009933 and AST-1615917. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The SMT is operated by the Arizona Radio Observatory (ARO), the Steward Observatory, and the University of Arizona, with support through the NSF University Radio Observatories program (AST-1140030). – 44 – REFERENCES A'Hearn, M. F., Belton, M. J. S., Delamere, W. A., Feaga, L. M., Hampton, D., Kissel, J., Klaasen, K. P., McFadden, L. A., Meech, K. J., Melosh, H. J., Schultz, P. H., Sunshine, J. M., Thomas, P. C., Veverka, J., Wellnitz, D. D., Yeomans, D. K., Besse, S., Bodewits, D., Bowling, T. J., Carcich, B. T., Collins, S. M., Farnham, T. L., Groussin, O., Hermalyn, B., Kelley, M. S., Kelley, M. S., Li, J.-Y., Lindler, D. J., Lisse, C. M., McLaughlin, S. A., Merlin, F., Protopapa, S., Richardson, J. E., & Williams, J. L. 2011, Science, 332, 1396 A'Hearn, M. F., Belton, M. J. S., Delamere, W. A., Kissel, J., Klaasen, K. P., McFadden, L. A., Meech, K. J., Melosh, H. J., Schultz, P. H., Sunshine, J. M., Thomas, P. C., Veverka, J., Yeomans, D. K., Baca, M. W., Busko, I., Crockett, C. J., Collins, S. M., Desnoyer, M., Eberhardy, C. A., Ernst, C. M., Farnham, T. L., Feaga, L., Groussin, O., Hampton, D., Ipatov, S. I., Li, J.-Y., Lindler, D., Lisse, C. M., Mastrodemos, N., Owen, W. M., Richardson, J. E., Wellnitz, D. D., & White, R. L. 2005, Science, 310, 258 A'Hearn, M. F., Feaga, L. M., Keller, H. U., Kawakita, H., Hampton, D. L., Kissel, J., Klaasen, K. P., McFadden, L. A., Meech, K. J., Schultz, P. H., Sunshine, J. M., Thomas, P. C., Veverka, J., Yeomans, D. K., Besse, S., Bodewits, D., Farnham, T. L., Groussin, O., Kelley, M. S., Lisse, C. M., Merlin, F., Protopapa, S., & Wellnitz, D. D. 2012, ApJ, 758, 29 A'Hearn, M. F., Millis, R. C., Schleicher, D. O., Osip, D. J., & Birch, P. V. 1995, Icarus, 118, 223 A'Hearn, M. F., Schleicher, D. G., Millis, R. L., Feldman, P. D., & Thompson, D. T. 1984, AJ, 89, 579 – 45 – Bar-Nun, A., Kleinfeld, I., & Kochavi, E. 1988, Phys. Rev. B, 38, 7749 Bar-Nun, A. & Owen, T. 1998, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 227, Solar System Ices, ed. B. Schmitt, C. de Bergh, & M. Festou, 353 Bauer, J. M., Stevenson, R., Kramer, E., Mainzer, A. K., Grav, T., Masiero, J. R., Fern´andez, Y. R., Cutri, R. M., Dailey, J. W., Masci, F. J., Meech, K. J., Walker, R., Lisse, C. M., Weissman, P. R., Nugent, C. R., Sonnett, S., Blair, N., Lucas, A., McMillan, R. S., Wright, E. L., WISE, t., & NEOWISE Teams. 2015a, ApJ, 814, 85 -. 2015b, ApJ, 814, 85 Belton, M. J. S. & Melosh, J. 2009, Icarus, 200, 280 Bhardwaj, A. & Raghuram, S. 2011, MNRAS, 412, L25 Biver. 1997, Universit Paris 7 Biver, N., Bockelee-Morvan, D., Colom, P., Crovisier, J., Davies, J. K., Dent, W. R. F., Despois, D., Gerard, E., Lellouch, E., Rauer, H., Moreno, R., & Paubert, G. 1997a, Science, 275, 1915 Biver, N., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Colom, P., Crovisier, J., Germain, B., Lellouch, E., Davies, J. K., Dent, W. R. F., Moreno, R., Paubert, G., Wink, J., Despois, D., Lis, D. C., Mehringer, D., Benford, D., Gardner, M., Phillips, T. G., Gunnarsson, M., Rickman, H., Winnberg, A., Bergman, P., Johansson, L. E. B., & Rauer, H. 1997b, Earth Moon and Planets, 78, 5 Biver, N., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Colom, P., Crovisier, J., Henry, F., Lellouch, E., Winnberg, A., Johansson, L. E. B., Gunnarsson, M., Rickman, H., Rantakyro, F., Davies, J. K., Dent, W. R. F., Paubert, G., Moreno, R., Wink, J., Despois, D., Benford, D. J., – 46 – Gardner, M., Lis, D. C., Mehringer, D., Phillips, T. G., & Rauer, H. 2002, Earth Moon and Planets, 90, 5 Biver, N., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Crovisier, J., Davies, J. K., Matthews, H. E., Wink, J. E., Rauer, H., Colom, P., Dent, W. R. F., Despois, D., Moreno, R., Paubert, G., Jewitt, D., & Senay, M. 1999, AJ, 118, 1850 Biver, N., Rauer, H., Despois, D., Moreno, R., Paubert, G., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Colom, P., Crovisier, J., G´erard, E., & Jorda, L. 1996, Nature, 380, 137 Bockelee-Morvan, D., Biver, N., Crovisier, J., de Val-Borro, M., Fulton, T., Hartogh, P., Hutsem´ekers, D., Jarchow, C., Jehin, E., Kidger, M., Kueppers, M., Lellouch, E., Lis, D., Manfroid, J., Moreno, R., Rengel, M., Swinyard, B. C., Szutowicz, S., Vandenbussche, B., & HssO Team. 2010, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 42, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #42, 946 Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Biver, N., Jehin, E., Cochran, A. L., Wiesemeyer, H., Manfroid, J., Hutsem´ekers, D., Arpigny, C., Boissier, J., Cochran, W., Colom, P., Crovisier, J., Milutinovic, N., Moreno, R., Prochaska, J. X., Ramirez, I., Schulz, R., & Zucconi, J.-M. 2008, ApJ, 679, L49 Bockelee-Morvan, D., Biver, N., Opitom, C., Hutsemekers, D., Crovisier, J., Jehin, E., Hartogh, P., Szutowizc, S., Lellouch, E., Kidger, M., Vandenbussche, B., Zakharov, V., & HSSO Team. 2014, in Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 2014, ed. K. Muinonen, A. Penttila, M. Granvik, A. Virkki, G. Fedorets, O. Wilkman, & T. Kohout Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Lellouch, E., Biver, N., Paubert, G., Bauer, J., Colom, P., & Lis, D. C. 2001, Astron. and Astrophy., 377, 343 Boehnhardt, H., Birkle, K., Fiedler, A., Jorda, L., Thomas, N., Peschke, S., Rauer, H., – 47 – Schulz, R., Schwehm, G., Tozzi, G., & West, R. 1997, Earth Moon and Planets, 78, 179 Boice, D. C. & Huebner, W. F. 1993, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 25, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #25, 1064 Boss, A. P. 1994, Icarus, 107, 422 Braunstein, M., Comstock, R., Hoffman, P., Womack, M., Deglman, F., Pinnick, D., Aaker, G., Goldschen, M., Jacobson, A., Zilka, J., Faith, D., Moore, S., Ricotta, J., Weist, A., & Modi, C. 1997, Earth Moon and Planets, 78, 219 Brown, G. N. & Ziegler, W. T. 1979, Adv. Cryogen. Engineering, 25, 662 Buratti, B. J. & Dunbar, R. S. 1991, ApJ, 366, L47 Bus, S. J., A'Hearn, M. F., Schleicher, D. G., & Bowell, E. 1991, Science, 251, 774 Bus, S. J., Bowell, E., Harris, A. W., & Hewitt, A. V. 1989, Icarus, 77, 223 Bus, S. J., Buie, M. W., Schleicher, D. G., Hubbard, W. B., Marcialis, R. L., Hill, R., Wasserman, L. H., Spencer, J. R., Millis, R. L., Franz, O. G., Bosh, A. S., Dunham, E. W., Ford, C. H., Young, J. W., Elliott, J. L., Meserole, R., Olkin, C. B., McDonald, S. W., Foust, J. A., Sopata, L. M., & Bandyopadhyay, R. M. 1996, Icarus, 123, 478 Bus, S. J., Stern, S. A., & A'Hearn, M. F. 1993, Proceedings of the Distant Comet Activity Workshop, 41 Campins, H., Telesco, C. M., Osip, D. J., Rieke, G. H., Rieke, M. J., & Schulz, B. 1994, AJ, 108, 2318 Capria, M. T., Coradini, A., & de Sanctis, M. C. 2002, Earth Moon and Planets, 90, 217 – 48 – Capria, M. T., Coradini, A., De Sanctis, M. C., & Orosei, R. 2000, AJ, 119, 3112 Cochran, A. L. 2002, ApJ, 576, L165 Cochran, A. L., Barker, E. S., & Cochran, W. D. 1980, Astron. J., 85, 474 Cochran, A. L. & Cochran, W. D. 1991, Icarus, 90, 172 Cochran, A. L., Cochran, W. D., & Barker, E. S. 1982, ApJ, 254, 816 -. 2000, Icarus, 146, 583 Cook, J. C., Desch, S. J., & Wyckoff, S. 2005, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 37, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #37, 645 Crifo, J. F., Rodionov, A. V., & Bockel´ee-Morvan, D. 1999, Icarus, 138, 85 Crovisier, J. 1997, Earth Moon and Planets, 79, 125 Crovisier, J., Biver, N., Bockelee-Morvan, D., Colom, P., Jorda, L., Lellouch, E., Paubert, G., & Despois, D. 1995, Icarus, 115, 213 Crovisier, J. & Le Bourlot, J. 1983, A&A, 123, 61 Crovisier, J., Leech, K., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Brooke, T. Y., Hanner, M. S., Altieri, B., Keller, H. U., & Lellouch, E. 1997, in ESA Special Publication, Vol. 419, The first ISO workshop on Analytical Spectroscopy, ed. A. M. Heras, K. Leech, N. R. Trams, & M. Perry, 137 De Sanctis, M. C., Capria, M. T., & Coradini, A. 2001a, AJ, 121, 2792 -. 2001b, AJ, 121, 2792 Decock, A., Jehin, E., Rousselot, P., Hutsem´ekers, D., Manfroid, J., Raghuram, S., Bhardwaj, A., & Hubert, B. 2015, A&A, 573, A1 – 49 – Dello Russo, N., Kawakita, H., Vervack, R. J., & Weaver, H. A. 2016, Icarus, 278, 301 Delsemme, A. H. & Miller, D. C. 1971, Planet. Space Sci., 19, 1229 Despois, D., Biver, N., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., & Crovisier, J. 2005, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 231, Astrochemistry: Recent Successes and Current Challenges, ed. D. C. Lis, G. A. Blake, & E. Herbst, 469–478 DiSanti, M., Mumma, N. J., Dello Russo, N., Magee-Sauer, K., Novak, R., & Rettig, T. W. 1999, Nature, 399, 662 Dones, L., Brasser, R., Kaib, N., & Rickman, H. 2015, Space Sci. Rev., 197, 191 Drahus, M., Yang, B., Lis, D. C., & Jewitt, D. 2016, MNRAS Duffard, R., Lazzaro, D., Pinto, S., Carvano, J., Angeli, C., Alvarez-Candal, A., & Fern´andez, S. 2002, Icarus, 160, 44 Duffard, R., Pinilla-Alonso, N., Ortiz, J. L., Alvarez-Candal, A., Sicardy, B., Santos-Sanz, P., Morales, N., Colazo, C., Fern´andez-Valenzuela, E., & Braga-Ribas, F. 2014, A&A, 568, A79 Durda, D. D. & Stern, S. A. 2000, Icarus, 145, 220 Elliot, J. L., Olkin, C. B., Dunham, E. W., Ford, C. H., Gilmore, D. K., Kurtz, D., Lazzaro, D., Rank, D. M., Temi, P., Bandyopadhyay, R. M., Barroso, J., Barucci, A., Bosh, A. S., Buie, M. W., Bus, S. J., Dahn, C. C., Foryta, D. W., Hubbard, W. B., Lopes, D. F., Marcialis, R. L., McDonald, S. W., Millis, R. L., Reitsema, H., Schleicher, D. G., Sicardy, B., Stone, R. P. S., & Wasserman, L. H. 1995, Nature, 373, 46 Enzian, A. 1999, Space Sci. Rev., 90, 131 Enzian, A., Cabot, H., & Klinger, J. 1997, A&A, 319, 995 – 50 – Fanale, F. P. & Salvail, J. R. 1997, Icarus, 125, 397 Farinella, P. & Davis, D. R. 1996, Science, 273, 938 Feaga, L. M., A'Hearn, M. F., Farnham, T. L., Bodewits, D., Sunshine, J. M., Gersch, A. M., Protopapa, S., Yang, B., Drahus, M., & Schleicher, D. G. 2014, AJ, 147, 24 Feldman, P. D., Cochran, A. L., & Combi, M. R. Spectroscopic investigations of fragment species in the coma, ed. M. C. Festou, H. U. Keller, & H. A. Weaver, 425–447 Feldman, P. D., Festou, M. C., Tozzi, P., & Weaver, H. A. 1997a, ApJ, 475, 829 -. 1997b, ApJ, 475, 829 Feldman, P. D., McPhate, J. B., Weaver, H. A., Tozzi, G.-P., & A'Hearn, M. F. 1996, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 28, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #28, 1084 Fernandez, J. A. 1980, Icarus, 42, 406 Fernandez, J. A. & Gallardo, T. 1994, A&A, 281, 911 Fern´andez, Y. R. 2000, Earth Moon and Planets, 89, 3 -. 2009, Planet. Space Sci., 57, 1218 Fern´andez, Y. R., Wellnitz, D. D., Buie, M. W., Dunham, E. W., Millis, R. L., Nye, R. A., Stansberry, J. A., Wasserman, L. H., A'Hearn, M. F., Lisse, C. M., Golden, M. E., Person, M. J., Howell, R. R., Marcialis, R. L., & Spitale, J. N. 1999, Icarus, 140, 205 Festou, M. C., Barale, O., Davidge, T., Stern, S. A., Tozzi, G. P., Womack, M., & Zucconi, J. M. 1998, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 30, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #30, 1089 – 51 – Festou, M. C., Gunnarsson, M., Rickman, H., Winnberg, A., & Tancredi, G. 2001, Icarus, 150, 140 Fitzsimmons, A. & Cartwright, I. M. 1996, MNRAS, 278, L37 Fornasier, S., Lellouch, E., Muller, T., Santos-Sanz, P., Panuzzo, P., Kiss, C., Lim, T., Mommert, M., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Vilenius, E., Stansberry, J., Tozzi, G. P., Mottola, S., Delsanti, A., Crovisier, J., Duffard, R., Henry, F., Lacerda, P., Barucci, A., & Gicquel, A. 2013, A&A, 555, A15 Foster, M. J., Green, S. F., McBride, N., & Davies, J. K. 1999, Icarus, 141, 408 Fox, J. L. & Black, J. H. 1989, Geophys. Res. Lett., 16, 291 Fray, N., B´enilan, Y., Cottin, H., Gazeau, M.-C., & Crovisier, J. 2005, Planet. Space Sci., 53, 1243 Fulle, M. 1992, Nature, 359, 42 -. 1994, A&A, 282, 980 Ghormley, J. A. 1968, J. Chem. Phys., 48, 503 Graham, Jr., R. A. & Womack, M. 1995, in B.A.A.S., Vol. 27, #186, 857 Gronkowski, P. & Smela, J. 1998, A&A, 338, 761 Groussin, O., Lamy, P., & Jorda, L. 2004, A&A, 413, 1163 Gunnarsson, M., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Biver, N., Crovisier, J., & Rickman, H. 2008, Astron. and Astroph., 484, 537 Gunnarsson, M., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Winnberg, A., Rickman, H., Crovisier, J., Biver, N., Colom, P., Davies, J. K., Despois, D., Henry, F., Johansson, L. E. B., Moreno, R., Paubert, G., & Rantakyro, F. T. 2003, A&A, 402, 383 – 52 – Gunnarsson, M., Rickman, H., Festou, M. C., Winnberg, A., & Tancredi, G. 2002, Icarus, 157, 309 Hahn, G. & Bailey, M. E. 1990, Nature, 348, 132 Hanner, M. S. 1981, Icarus, 47, 342 -. 1984, ApJ, 277, L75 Hartmann, W. K., Tholen, D. J., Meech, K. J., & Cruikshank, D. P. 1990, Icarus, 83, 1 Haruyama, J., Yamamoto, T., Mizutani, H., & Greenberg, J. M. 1993, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 15 Hassig, M., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., Bar-Nun, A., Berthelier, J. J., Bieler, A., Bochsler, P., Briois, C., Calmonte, U., Combi, M., De Keyser, J., Eberhardt, P., Fiethe, B., Fuselier, S. A., Galand, M., Gasc, S., Gombosi, T. I., Hansen, K. C., Jackel, A., Keller, H. U., Kopp, E., Korth, A., Kuhrt, E., Le Roy, L., Mall, U., Marty, B., Mousis, O., Neefs, E., Owen, T., R`eme, H., Rubin, M., S´emon, T., Tornow, C., Tzou, C.-Y., Waite, J. H., & Wurz, P. 2015, Science, 347, aaa0276 Hughes, D. W. 1991, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 167, IAU Colloq. 116: Comets in the post-Halley era, ed. R. L. Newburn, Jr., M. Neugebauer, & J. Rahe, 825–851 Iro, N., Gautier, D., Hersant, F., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., & Lunine, J. I. 2003, Icarus, 161, 511 Irvine, W. M., Schloerb, F. P., Crovisier, J., Fegley, Jr., B., & Mumma, M. J. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 1159 Ivanova, A., Afanasiev, V., Korsun, P., Baransky, A., Andreev, M., & Ponomarenko, V. 2015, Highlights of Astronomy, 16, 176 – 53 – Ivanova, O. V., Luk'yanyk, I. V., Kiselev, N. N., Afanasiev, V. L., Picazzio, E., Cavichia, O., de Almeida, A. A., & Andrievsky, S. M. 2016, Planet. Space Sci., 121, 10 Jewitt, D. 1990, Astroph. J., 351, 277 -. 1993, Proceedings of the Workshop on the Activity of Distant Comets, 64 Jewitt, D., Garland, C. A., & Aussel, H. 2008, AJ, 135, 400 Jewitt, D., Senay, M., & Matthews, H. 1996, Science, 271, 1110 Kelley, M. S., Lindler, D. J., Bodewits, D., A'Hearn, M. F., Lisse, C. M., Kolokolova, L., Kissel, J., & Hermalyn, B. 2013, Icarus, 222, 634 Klinger, J. 1980, Science, 209, 634 -. 1981, Icarus, 47, 320 Kouchi, A., Greenberg, J. M., Yamamoto, T., & Mukai, T. 1992, ApJ, 388, L73 Kouchi, A. & Sirono, S.-i. 2001, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 827 Kouchi, A., Yamamoto, T., Kozasa, T., Kuroda, T., & Greenberg, J. M. 1994, A&A, 290 Kulyk, I., Korsun, P., Rousselot, P., Afanasiev, V., & Ivanova, O. 2016, Icarus, 271, 314 Lamy, P. L. 1974, A&A, 35, 197 Larson, S. M. 1980, ApJ, 238, L47 Laufer, D., Kochavi, E., & Bar-Nun, A. 1987, Phys. Rev. B, 36, 9219 Lazzaro, D., Florczak, M. A., Angeli, C. A., Carvano, J. M., Betzler, A. S., Casati, A. A., Barucci, M. A., Doressoundiram, A., & Lazzarin, M. 1997, Planet. Space Sci., 45, 1607 – 54 – Lebofsky, L. A., Tholen, D. J., Rieke, G. H., & Lebofsky, M. J. 1984, Icarus, 60, 532 Lellouch, E., Crovisier, J., Lim, T., Bockelee-Morvan, D., Leech, K., Hanner, M. S., Altieri, B., Schmitt, B., Trotta, F., & Keller, H. U. 1998, A&A, 339, L9 Levison, H. F. & Duncan, M. J. 1994, Icarus, 108, 18 Lutz, B. L., Womack, M., & Wagner, R. M. 1993, ApJ, 407, 402 Luu, J. X. & Jewitt, D. C. 1990, AJ, 100, 913 Luu, J. X., Jewitt, D. C., & Trujillo, C. 2000, ApJ, 531, L151 Magnani, L. & A'Hearn, M. F. 1986, ApJ, 302, 477 Marcialis, R. L. & Buratti, B. J. 1993, Icarus, 104, 234 Matthews, C. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 74, Progress in the Search for Extraterrestrial Life., ed. G. S. Shostak, 95 Mazzotta Epifani, E., Palumbo, P., Capria, M. T., Cremonese, G., Fulle, M., & Colangeli, L. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 713 McKay, A. J., Chanover, N. J., Morgenthaler, J. P., Cochran, A. L., Harris, W. M., & Russo, N. D. 2012, Icarus, 220, 277 McKay, A. J., Cochran, A. L., DiSanti, M. A., Villanueva, G., Russo, N. D., Vervack, R. J., Morgenthaler, J. P., Harris, W. M., & Chanover, N. J. 2015, Icarus, 250, 504 Meech, K. J. & Belton, M. J. S. 1990, Astron. J., 100, 1323 Meech, K. J., Belton, M. J. S., Mueller, B. E. A., Dicksion, M. W., & Li, H. R. 1993, AJ, 106, 1222 Meech, K. J. & Jewitt, D. 1987, Nature, 328, 506 – 55 – Miles, R. 2016, Icarus, 272, 356 Moreno, F. 2009, ApJS, 183, 33 Mumma, M. J., Weissman, P. R., & Stern, S. A. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, ed. E. H. Levy & J. I. Lunine, 1177–1252 Ootsubo, T., Kawakita, H., Hamada, S., Kobayashi, H., Yamaguchi, M., Usui, F., Nakagawa, T., Ueno, M., Ishiguro, M., Sekiguchi, T., Watanabe, J.-i., Sakon, I., Shimonishi, T., & Onaka, T. 2012, ApJ, 752, 15 Ortiz, J. L., Duffard, R., Pinilla-Alonso, N., Alvarez-Candal, A., Santos-Sanz, P., Morales, N., Fern´andez-Valenzuela, E., Licandro, J., Campo Bagatin, A., & Thirouin, A. 2015, A&A, 576, A18 Paganini, L., Mumma, M. J., Boehnhardt, H., DiSanti, M. A., Villanueva, G. L., Bonev, B. P., Lippi, M., Kaufl, H. U., & Blake, G. A. 2013, Astroph. J., 766, 100 Parker, J. W., Stern, S. A., Festou, M. C., A'Hearn, M. F., & Weintraub, D. 1997, AJ, 113, 1899 Patashnick, H. 1974, Nature, 250, 313 Patzold, M., Andert, T., Hahn, M., Asmar, S. W., Barriot, J.-P., Bird, M. K., Hausler, B., Peter, K., Tellmann, S., Grun, E., Weissman, P. R., Sierks, H., Jorda, L., Gaskell, R., Preusker, F., & Scholten, F. 2016, Nature, 530, 63 Pierce, D. M. & A'Hearn, M. F. 2010, ApJ, 718, 340 Prialnik, D. 1997a, ApJ, 478, L107 -. 1997b, Earth Moon and Planets, 77, 223 – 56 – Prialnik, D. & Bar-Nun, A. 1990a, ApJ, 363, 274 -. 1990b, ApJ, 363, 274 Prialnik, D., Bar-Nun, A., & Podolak, M. 1987, ApJ, 319, 993 Prialnik, D., Benkhoff, J., & Podolak, M. Modeling the structure and activity of comet nuclei, ed. G. W. Kronk, 359–387 Prialnik, D., Brosch, N., & Ianovici, D. 1995, MNRAS, 276, 1148 Prialnik, D., Egozi, U., Bar-Nun, A., Podolak, M., & Mekler, Y. 1992, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 24, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #24, 1019 Prialnik, D. & Podolak, M. 1995, Icarus, 117, 420 -. 1999, Space Sci. Rev., 90, 169 Prialnik, D., Sarid, G., Rosenberg, E. D., & Merk, R. 2008, Space Sci. Rev., 138, 147 Protopapa, S., Sunshine, J. M., Feaga, L. M., Kelley, M. S. P., A'Hearn, M. F., Farnham, T. L., Groussin, O., Besse, S., Merlin, F., & Li, J.-Y. 2014, Icarus, 238, 191 Raghuram, S. & Bhardwaj, A. 2014, A&A, 566, A134 Rauer, H., Biver, N., Crovisier, J., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Colom, P., Despois, D., Ip, W.-H., Jorda, L., Lellouch, E., Paubert, G., & Thomas, N. 1997, Planet. Space Sci., 45, 799 Rauer, H., Helbert, J., Arpigny, C., Benkhoff, J., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Boehnhardt, H., Colas, F., Crovisier, J., Hainaut, O., Jorda, L., Kueppers, M., Manfroid, J., & Thomas, N. 2003, A&A, 397, 1109 Reach, W. T., Kelley, M. S., & Vaubaillon, J. 2013a, Icarus, 226, 777 – 57 – -. 2013b, Icarus, 226, 777 Rettig, T. W., Tegler, S. C., Pasto, D. J., & Mumma, M. J. 1992, ApJ, 398, 293 Roemer, E. 1958, PASP, 70, 272 -. 1962, PASP, 74, 351 Romon-Martin, J., Delahodde, C., Barucci, M. A., de Bergh, C., & Peixinho, N. 2003, A&A, 400, 369 Rousselot, P. 2008, A&A, 480, 543 Rubin, M., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., Bar-Nun, A., Berthelier, J.-J., Bieler, A., Bochsler, P., Briois, C., Calmonte, U., Combi, M., De Keyser, J., Dhooghe, F., Eberhardt, P., Fiethe, B., Fuselier, S. A., Gasc, S., Gombosi, T. I., Hansen, K. C., Hassig, M., Jackel, A., Kopp, E., Korth, A., Le Roy, L., Mall, U., Marty, B., Mousis, O., Owen, T., R`eme, H., S´emon, T., Tzou, C.-Y., Waite, J. H., & Wurz, P. 2015, Science, 348, 232 Ruprecht, J. D., Bosh, A. S., Person, M. J., Bianco, F. B., Fulton, B. J., Gulbis, A. A. S., Bus, S. J., & Zangari, A. M. 2015, Icarus, 252, 271 Sarid, G., Prialnik, D., Meech, K. J., Pittichov´a, J., & Farnham, T. L. 2005, PASP, 117, 796 Schambeau, C. A., Fern´andez, Y. R., Lisse, C. M., Samarasinha, N., & Woodney, L. M. 2015, Icarus, 260, 60 Schmitt, B., Espinasse, S., Grim, R. J. A., Greenberg, J. M., & Klinger, J. 1989, in ESA Special Publication, Vol. 302, Physics and Mechanics of Cometary Materials, ed. J. J. Hunt & T. D. Guyenne – 58 – Schulz, R. 2002, A&A Rev., 11, 1 Sekanina, Z. 1996, A&A, 314, 957 -. 1997, Earth Moon and Planets, 77, 147 Sekanina, Z., Chodas, P. W., & Yeomans, D. K. 1994, A&A, 289, 607 Sekanina, Z., Larson, S. M., Hainaut, O., Smette, A., & West, R. M. 1992, A&A, 263, 367 Senay, M. C. & Jewitt, D. 1994, Nature, 371, 229 Stansberry, J. A., Van Cleve, J., Reach, W. T., Cruikshank, D. P., Emery, J. P., Fernandez, Y. R., Meadows, V. S., Su, K. Y. L., Misselt, K., Rieke, G. H., Young, E. T., Werner, M. W., Engelbracht, C. W., Gordon, K. D., Hines, D. C., Kelly, D. M., Morrison, J. E., & Muzerolle, J. 2004, Astroph. J. Supp., 154, 463 Stern, S. A. 1989, PASP, 101, 126 -. 1995, AJ, 110, 856 Stern, S. A., Cunningham, N. J., & Schindhelm, E. 2014, AJ, 147, 102 Strazzulla, G., Pirronello, V., & Foti, G. 1983, A&A, 123, 93 Tholen, D. J., Hartmann, W. K., Cruikshank, D. P., Lilly, S., Bowell, E., & Hewitt, A. 1988, IAU Circ., 4554 Thomas, N., Sierks, H., Barbieri, C., Lamy, P. L., Rodrigo, R., Rickman, H., Koschny, D., Keller, H. U., Agarwal, J., A'Hearn, M. F., Angrilli, F., Auger, A.-T., Barucci, M. A., Bertaux, J.-L., Bertini, I., Besse, S., Bodewits, D., Cremonese, G., Da Deppo, V., Davidsson, B., De Cecco, M., Debei, S., El-Maarry, M. R., Ferri, F., Fornasier, S., Fulle, M., Giacomini, L., Groussin, O., Gutierrez, P. J., Guttler, C., Hviid, S. F., – 59 – Ip, W.-H., Jorda, L., Knollenberg, J., Kramm, J.-R., Kuhrt, E., Kuppers, M., La Forgia, F., Lara, L. M., Lazzarin, M., Moreno, J. J. L., Magrin, S., Marchi, S., Marzari, F., Massironi, M., Michalik, H., Moissl, R., Mottola, S., Naletto, G., Oklay, N., Pajola, M., Pommerol, A., Preusker, F., Sabau, L., Scholten, F., Snodgrass, C., Tubiana, C., Vincent, J.-B., & Wenzel, K.-P. 2015, Science, 347, aaa0440 Trigo-Rodr´ıguez, J. M., Garc´ıa-Hern´andez, D. A., S´anchez, A., Lacruz, J., Davidsson, B. J. R., Rodr´ıguez, D., Pastor, S., & de Los Reyes, J. A. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 1682 Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D., A'Hearn, M. F., & Arpigny, C. 1997, Science, 275, 1900 Weaver, H. A. & Lamy, P. L. 1997, Earth Moon and Planets, 79, 17 Weiler, M., Rauer, H., Knollenberg, J., Jorda, L., & Helbert, J. 2003, A&A, 403, 313 Weissman, P. R. 1999, Space Sci. Rev., 90, 301 West, R. M. 1991, A&A, 241, 635 Whipple, F. L. 1980, AJ, 85, 305 Whitney, C. 1955, ApJ, 122, 190 Womack, M., Festou, M. C., & Stern, S. A. 1997, AJ, 114, 2789 Womack, M. & Stern, S. A. 1999, Solar System Research, 33, 187 Womack, M., Wyckoff, S., & Ziurys, L. M. 1992, ApJ, 401, 728 Woodney, L. M., A'Hearn, M. F., McMullin, J., & Samarasinha, N. 1997, Earth Moon and Planets, 78, 69 Wyckoff, S., Wagner, R. M., Wehinger, P. A., Schleicher, D. G., & Festou, M. C. 1985, Nature, 316, 241 – 60 – Yamamoto, T. 1985, A&A, 142, 31 This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. – 61 – Table 1: Sublimation Temperatures of Cometary Species Species Temperaturea (K) N2 CO CH4 H2S C2H2 H2CO CO2 HC3N NH3 CS2 SO2 CH3CN HCN CH3OH H2O 22 25 31 57 57 64 72 74 78 78 83 91 95 99 152 a(Yamamoto 1985; Sekanina 1996) – 62 – Table 2: Representative Gaseous Production Rates in Three Comets Beyond 4 AU Comet Molecule r (AU) Q (number/s) Reference 29P 29P 29P 29P 29P 29P 29P Chiron Chiron CN CO H2O CO2 HCN CH3OH CH4 CN CO Chiron H2O (via OH) Chiron H2S Chiron H2CO Hale-Bopp CN Hale-Bopp CN Hale-Bopp CO Hale-Bopp H2O Hale-Bopp CO2 Hale-Bopp HCN Hale-Bopp CH3OH Hale-Bopp H2CO Hale-Bopp C3 5.8 8.0 × 1024 (Cochran & Cochran 1991) 5.7 - 6.2 1-7 × 1028 variousa 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 × 1027 (Ootsubo et al. 2012) <3.5e26 (Ootsubo et al. 2012) < 1.4 × 1027 (Paganini et al. 2013) <9.3 × 1027 (Paganini et al. 2013) <1.3 × 1027 (Paganini et al. 2013) 11.3 3.7 × 1025 (Bus et al. 1991) 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 6.8 9.8 6.8 4.8 4.6 4.8 5.0 4.1 7.0 1.3 × 1028 (Womack & Stern 1999), recalculated <4 × 1030 (Parker et al. 1997) <2.1 × 1027 (Rauer et al. 1997) <4.2 × 1026 (Rauer et al. 1997) 6 × 1025 (Fitzsimmons & Cartwright 1996) 0.9 × 1025 (Rauer et al. 2003) 1.8 × 1028 (Jewitt et al. 1996) 2.0 × 1028 (Weaver et al. 1997) 1.3 × 1028 (Crovisier 1997) 2 × 1026 (Jewitt et al. 1996) 3.3 × 1027 (Womack et al. 1997) 5.8 × 1026 (Biver et al. 1999) ≤ 0.6 × 1025 (Rauer et al. 2003) aThe range of CO production rates typically observed is listed, taken from Senay & Jewitt (1994); Crovisier et al. (1995); Festou et al. (2001); Gunnarsson et al. (2008); Paganini et al. (2013) – 63 – Table 3: CN/CO production rate ratios in three distant comets Comet r (AU) Q(CN)/Q(CO) Reference Chiron 11, 8.5 0.0025 Bus et al. (1991); Womack & Stern (1999) 29P 5.8 Hale-Bopp 6.8 Hale-Bopp 6.0 0.0003 0.0033 0.0040 Cochran & Cochran (1991); Gunnarsson et al. (2008)a Fitzsimmons & Cartwright (1996); Jewitt et al. (1996) Rauer et al. (1997); Biver et al. (2002) aThis ratio for 29P may typically be significantly lower, as CN is rarely observed in this comet. – 64 – Table 4: Ratios of CO2/CO production rates in distant comets Comet r (AU) Q(CO2)/Q(CO) Reference 29p 6.2 <0.0125 Ootsubo et al. (2012) Hale-Bopp 4.6 Hale-Bopp 4.9 Hale-Bopp 4.0 Hale-Bopp 3.89 0.10 0.19 0.55 0.10 Crovisier (1997) Crovisier (1997) Weaver et al. (1997) Crovisier (1997) – 65 – Table 5: CO Production Rates in Comet 29P Date r (AU) Qa ( × 1028 molecules s−1) 25-Feb-16 5.96 5.3 ± 1.3 26-Feb-16 5.96 3.8 ± 0.9 28-Feb-16 5.96 5.1 ± 1.3 29-Feb-16 5.96 2.5 ± 0.6 1-Mar-16 5.96 2.8 ± 0.7 3-Mar-16 5.96 2.6 ± 0.7 21-Mar-16 5.95 3.2 ± 0.8 28-Mar-16 5.95 2.6 ± 0.7 31-Mar-16 5.95 1.0 ± 0.2 9-Apr-16 5.95 0.9 ± 0.2 15-Apr-16 5.95 0.8 ± 0.2 24-Apr-16 5.94 1.0 ± 0.2 29-May-16 5.93 1.0 ± 0.3 aProduction rates derived from observations of the CO J=2-1 line using the Arizona Radio Observatory 10-m Submillimeter Telescope (SMT). Full details in Wierzchos et al., in preparation. – 66 – Comet Hale-Bopp Heliocentric Distance ~ 5 AU CO CH3OH -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 Offset Velocity (km/s) ) K ( * R T 0.1 0 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 -0.01 -0.02 -8 Fig. 1.- Spectra of CO and CH3OH emission from comet C/1995 O1 Hale-Bopp at 5 AU, pre-perihelion, obtained with the NRAO 12-m telescope. The CO J=2-1 spectrum was obtained at 230 GHz on 1996 March 31 with 49 kHz/channel resolution, which corresponds to 0.06 km/s/channel; the methanol emission was obtained at 145 GHz on 1996 Apr 16 with 195 kHz/channel resolution, which corresponds to 0.40 km/s/channel. The dotted line indicates the comet's rest frame velocity. As the figure shows, the CO emission is blue-shifted from the ephemeris velocity of the comet and has a very narrow line-width. In contrast, the methanol emission has no measurable shift from the comet's velocity and has a broader line-width. This difference can be explained if CO emission originates from within the cold comet nucleus and the methanol escapes from hot grains in the coma. – 67 – CO Production Rates in 3 Distant Comets 1029 1028 1027 ) s / s e l u c e l o m ( ) O C Q ( Hale-Bopp: Womack et al. 1997, re-calculated 29P: Graham & Womack 1995 recalculated, Wierzchos et al., in prep. Chiron: Womack & Stern 1999, recalculated Chiron: Drahus et al. 2016, upper limit Hale-Bopp: Gunnarsson et al. 2003, isotropic source Q(CO)=3.5x1029r-2 for Hale-Bopp 4 5 6 Heliocentric distance (AU) 7 8 9 10 10 11 Fig. 2.- CO production rates from three distant comets are plotted against heliocentric distance. The observations of Hale-Bopp and 29P are consistent with a nominal production rate of Q(CO)=3.5 × 1029r−2 superimposed with sporadic outbursts. – 68 – Comet 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 Heliocentric Distance ~ 6 AU CO J=2-1 0.1 0.05 0 ) K ( * R T -4 -2 0 Offset Velocity (km/s) 2 4 Fig. 3.- Spectrum of the CO J=2-1 rotational line in comet 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 obtained from 1995 Dec 9–11 UT with the NRAO 12-m telescope (Graham & Womack 1995). The spectral resolution was 100 kHz, which corresponds to 0.13 km/s per channel. The dotted line indicates the comet's rest frame velocity. Two narrow velocity components are seen in this spectrum and in many other observations of this comet. – 69 – Specific Production Rates for CO in Distant Comets ) 2 m k / s / s e l u c e l o m ( 2 D / ) O C Q ( 1027 1026 1025 1024 1023 1022 4 4 5 5 Hale-Bopp 10x enriched 50x enriched 10x depleted 50x depleted 29P Chiron Chiron upper limit 8 8 9 9 10 10 6 6 7 7 Heliocentric distance (AU) Heliocentric distance (AU) Fig. 4.- Specific production rates, Q(CO)/D2, for distant comets. The solid line is the specific production rate derived for Hale-Bopp, assuming Q(CO)=3.5 × 1029r−2, and diam- eter DHale−Bopp=60km. Values for Chiron and 29P are plotted assuming production rates from Figure 2 and DChiron=218km and D29P =60 km. This plot shows that, when adjusted for surface area and heliocentric distance, 29P (in non-outbursting mode) produces CO at approximately the same rate as, and up to ten times larger than, Hale-Bopp. In contrast, Chiron produces at least 5-15 times less CO than Hale-Bopp. This may indicate that 29P entered its current orbit more recently than many models predict, and that Chiron is signif- icantly depleted in CO over its initial chemical composition.
1306.0610	2	1306	2013-08-13T18:36:03	A Combined VLT and Gemini Study of the Atmosphere of the Directly-Imaged Planet, beta Pictoris b	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.IM", "astro-ph.SR" ]	We analyze new/archival VLT/NaCo and Gemini/NICI high-contrast imaging of the young, self-luminous planet $\beta$ Pictoris b in seven near-to-mid IR photometric filters, using advanced image processing methods to achieve high signal-to-noise, high precision measurements. While $\beta$ Pic b's near-IR colors mimick that of a standard, cloudy early-to-mid L dwarf, it is overluminous in the mid-infrared compared to the field L/T dwarf sequence. Few substellar/planet-mass objects -- i.e. $\kappa$ And b and 1RXJ 1609B -- match $\beta$ Pic b's $JHK_{s}L^\prime$ photometry, and its 3.1 $\mu m$ and 5 $\mu m$ photometry are particularly difficult to reproduce. Atmosphere models adopting cloud prescriptions and large ($\sim$ 60 $\mu m$) dust grains fail to reproduce the $\beta$ Pic b spectrum. However, models incorporating thick clouds similar to those found for HR 8799 bcde but also with small (a few microns) modal particle sizes yield fits consistent with the data within uncertainties. Assuming solar abundance models, thick clouds, and small dust particles ($<a>$ = 4 $\mu m$) we derive atmosphere parameters of log(g) = 3.8 $\pm$ 0.2 and $T_{eff}$ = 1575--1650 $K$, an inferred mass of 7$^{+4}_{-3}$ $M_{J}$, and a luminosity of log(L/L$_{\odot}$) $\sim$ -3.80 $\pm$ 0.02. The best-estimated planet radius, $\approx$ 1.65 $\pm$ 0.06 $R_{J}$, is near the upper end of allowable planet radii for hot-start models given the host star's age and likely reflects challenges with constructing accurate atmospheric models. Alternatively, these radii are comfortably consistent with hot-start model predictions if $\beta$ Pic b is younger than $\approx$ 7 Myr, consistent with a late formation, well after its host star's birth $\sim$ 12$^{+8}_{-4}$ Myr ago.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version July 22, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 A COMBINED VLT AND GEMINI STUDY OF THE ATMOSPHERE OF THE DIRECTLY-IMAGED PLANET, β PICTORIS b Thayne Currie1, Adam Burrows2, Nikku Madhusudhan3, Misato Fukagawa4, Julien H. Girard5, Rebekah Dawson6, Ruth Murray-Clay6, Scott Kenyon6, Marc Kuchner7, Soko Matsumura8, Ray Jayawardhana1, John Chambers9, Ben Bromley10 3 1 0 2 g u A 3 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 0 1 6 0 . 6 0 3 1 : v i X r a Draft version July 22, 2018 ABSTRACT We analyze new/archival VLT/NaCo and Gemini/NICI high-contrast imaging of the young, self- luminous planet β Pictoris b in seven near-to-mid IR photometric filters, using advanced image pro- cessing methods to achieve high signal-to-noise, high precision measurements. While β Pic b's near-IR colors mimick that of a standard, cloudy early-to-mid L dwarf, it is overluminous in the mid-infrared compared to the field L/T dwarf sequence. Few substellar/planet-mass objects -- i.e. κ And b and 1RXJ 1609B -- match β Pic b's JHKsL′ photometry, and its 3.1 µm and 5 µm photometry are particularly difficult to reproduce. Atmosphere models adopting cloud prescriptions and large (∼ 60 µm) dust grains fail to reproduce the β Pic b spectrum. However, models incorporating thick clouds similar to those found for HR 8799 bcde but also with small (a few microns) modal particle sizes yield fits consistent with the data within uncertainties. Assuming solar abundance models, thick clouds, and small dust particles (< a > = 4 µm) we derive atmosphere parameters of log(g) = 3.8 ± 0.2 and Tef f = 1575 -- 1650 K, an inferred mass of 7+4 −3 MJ , and a luminosity of log(L/L⊙) ∼ -3.80 ± 0.02. The best-estimated planet radius, ≈ 1.65 ± 0.06 RJ , is near the upper end of allowable planet radii for hot-start models given the host star's age and likely reflects challenges with constructing accurate atmospheric models. Alternatively, these radii are comfortably consistent with hot-start model pre- dictions if β Pic b is younger than ≈ 7 Myr, consistent with a late formation, well after its host star's birth ∼ 12+8 Subject headings: planetary systems, stars: early-type, stars: individual: β Pictoris −4 Myr ago. 1. INTRODUCTION The method of detecting extrasolar planets by di- rect imaging, even in its current early stage, fills in an important gap in our knowledge of the diversity of planetary systems around nearby stars. Direct imag- ing searches with the best conventional AO systems (e.g. Keck/NIRC2, VLT/NaCo, Subaru/HiCIAO) are sensi- tive to very massive planets (M & 5 -- 10 MJ ) at wide separation (a ∼ 10-30 AU to 100 AU ) and young ages (t . 100 Myr), which are not detectable by the radial ve- locity and transit methods (e.g. Lafreni`ere et al. 2007a; Vigan et al. 2012; Rameau et al. 2013; Galicher et al. 2013). Planets with these masses and orbital sepa- rations pose a stiff challenge to planet formation the- ories (e.g. Kratter et al. 2010; Rafikov 2011). Young self-luminous directly-imageable planets provide a criti- cal probe of planet atmospheric evolution (Fortney et al. 2008; Currie et al. 2011a; Spiegel and Burrows 2012; Konopacky et al. 2013). 1 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto 2 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University 3 Department of Astronomy, Yale University 4 Osaka University 5 European Southern Observatory 6 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 7 NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center 8 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland-College Park 9 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington 10 Department of Physics, University of Utah The directly-imaged planet around the nearby star β Pictoris (β Pictoris b) is a particularly clear, crucial test for understanding the formation and atmospheric evolution of gas giant planets (Lagrange et al. 2009a, 2010). At 12+8 −4 Myr old (Zuckerman et al. 2001), the β Pictoris system provides a way to probe planet at- mospheric properties only ≈ 5 -- 10 Myr after the disks from which planets form dissipate (≈ 3 -- 10 Myr, e.g. Pascucci et al. 2006; Currie et al. 2009). Similar to the case for the HR 8799 planets (Marois et al. 2010a; Fabrycky and Murray-Clay 2010; Currie et al. 2011a; Sudol and Haghighipour 2012), β Pic b's mass can be constrained without depending on highly-uncertain planet cooling models: in this case, RV-derived dynam- ical mass upper limits when coupled with the range of plausible orbits (a ∼ 8 -- 10 AU) imply masses less than ∼ 10 -- 15 MJ (Lagrange et al. 2012a; Currie et al. 2011b; Chauvin et al. 2012; Bonnefoy et al. 2013), a mass range consistent with estimates derived from the planet's inter- action with the secondary disk (Lagrange et al. 2009a; Dawson et al. 2011). Furthermore, while other likely/candidate planets such as Fomalhaut b and LkCa 15 b are proba- bly made detectable by circumplanetary emission in some poorly constrained geometery (Currie et al. 2012a; Kraus and Ireland 2012), β Pic b's emission appears to be consistent with that from a self-luminous planet's atmosphere (Currie et al. 2011b; Bonnefoy et al. 2013). Other objects of comparable mass appear to have formed more like low-mass binary companions. Thus, com- bined with the planets HR 8799 bcde, β Pic b pro- 2 vides a crucial reference point with which to interpret the properties of many soon-to-be imaged planets with upcoming extreme AO systems like GP I, SCExAO, and SP HERE (Macintosh et al. 2008; Martinache et al. 2009; Beuzit et al. 2008). However, investigations into β Pic b's atmosphere are still in an early stage compared to those for the at- mospheres of the HR 8799 planets and other very low- mass, young substellar objects (e.g. Currie et al. 2011a; Skemer et al. 2011; Konopacky et al. 2013; Bailey et al. 2013). Of the current published photometry, only Ks (2.18 µm) and L′ (3.78 µm) have photometric er- rors smaller than ∼ 0.1 mag (Bonnefoy et al. 2011; Currie et al. 2011b). Other high SNR detections such as at M ′ were obtained without reliable flux calibra- tion (Currie et al. 2011b) or with additional, large pho- tometric uncertainties due to processing (Bonnefoy et al. 2013). As a result, the best-fit models admit a wide range of temperatures, surface gravities, and cloud structures (e.g. Currie et al. 2011b). Thus, new higher signal-to- noise/precision and flux-calibrated photometry at 1 -- 5 µm should provide a clearer picture of the clouds, chem- istry, temperature, and gravity of β Pic b. Moreover, new near-to-mid IR data may identify distinguishing char- acteristics of β Pic b's atmosphere, much like clouds and non-equilibrium carbon chemistry for HR 8799 bcde (Currie et al. 2011a; Galicher et al. 2011; Skemer et al. 2012; Konopacky et al. 2013). In this study, we present new 1.5 -- 5 µm observations for β Pic b obtained with N aCo on the Very Large Tele- scope and N ICI on Gemini-South. We extract the first detection at the 3.09 µm water-ice filter; the first high signal-noise, well calibrated H, [4.05], and M ′ detections; and higher signal-to-noise detections at Ks and L′ (2.18 and 3.8 µm). To our new data, we add rereduced β Pic data obtained in J (1.25 µm) and H (1.65 µm) bands and first presented in Bonnefoy et al. (2013), recovering β Pic b at a slightly higher signal-to-noise and deriving its photometry with smaller errors. We compare the colors derived from broadband pho- tometry to that for field substellar objects with a range of spectral types to assess whether β Pic b's col- ors appear anomalous/redder than the field sequence like those for planets around HR 8799 and κ And; planet-mass companions like 2M 1207 B, GSC 06214 B, and 1RXJ 1609 B (Chauvin et al. 2004; Ireland et al. 2011; Lafreni´ere et al. 2008); and other substellar ob- jects like Luhman 16B (Luhman et al. 2013). We use atmosphere modeling to constrain the range of tem- peratures, surface gravities, and cloud structures plau- sible for the planet. While previous studies have shown the importance of clouds and non-equilibrium carbon chemistry in fitting the spectra/photometry of directly-imaged planets (Bowler et al. 2010; Currie et al. 2011a; Madhusudhan et al. 2011; Galicher et al. 2011; Skemer et al. 2012; Konopacky et al. 2013), here the as- sumed sizes of dust particles entrained in the clouds plays a critical role. 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION 2.1. VLT/NaCo Data and Basic Processing We observed β Pictoris under photometric condi- tions on 14 December to 17 December 2012 with the NAOS-CONICA instrument (NaCo; Rousset et al. 2003) on the Very Large Telescope UT4/Yepun at Paranal Observatory (Program ID 090.C-0396). All data were taken in pupil-tracking/angular differential imaging (Marois et al. 2006) and data cube mode. Table 1 sum- marizes the basic properties of these observations. Our full complement of data during the run includes imag- ing at 1.04 µm, 2.12 µm, Ks/2.18 µm, 2.32 µm, 3.74 µm, L′/3.78 µm, Br-α/4.05 µm, and M ′. Here, we fo- cus only on the L′, [4.05], and M ′ data, deferring the rest to a later study. Each observation was centered on β Pictoris's transit for a total field rotation of ∼ 50 -- 70 degrees and a total observing times ranging between ∼ 30 minutes and 59 minutes. To these new observations, we rereduce J-band and H- band data first presented in Bonnefoy et al. (2013) and taken on 16 December 2011 and 11 January 2012, re- spectively. The saturated J band science images are bracketed by two sequences of unsaturated images ob- tained in neutral density filter for flux calibration. While there were additional frames taken but not analyzed in Bonnefoy et al., we found these to be of significantly poorer quality and thus do not consider them here. In total, the J-band data we consider covers 40 minutes of integration time and ∼ 23o of field rotation. The H-band data cover ∼ 92 minutes of integration time and ∼ 36o of field rotation. Basic NaCo image processing steps were performed as in Currie et al. (2010, 2011b). The thermal IR data at L′ and [4.05] (M ′) were obtained in a dither pattern with offsets every 2 (1) images to remove the sky background. As all data were obtained in data cube mode, we in- creased our PSF quality by realigning each individual exposure in the cube to a common center position and clipping out frames with low encircled energy (i.e. those with a core/halo ratio < max(core/halo) - 3×σ(core-to- halo ratio)). 2.2. Gemini/NICI Data and Basic Processing We obtained Gemini imaging for β Pic b using the Near-Infrared Coronagraphic Imager (NICI) on 23 De- cember 2012 and 26 December 2012 in the H2O filter (λo = 3.09 µm) and 9 January 2013 in the H and Ks filters (dual-channel imaging), both under photometric conditions (Program GS-2012B-Q-40). These observa- tions were also executed in angular differential imaging mode. For the H2O data, we dithered each 38 s expo- sure for sky subtraction for a total of ∼ 38 minutes of integration time over a field rotation of ∼ 30 degrees. For the H/Ks data, we placed the star behind the r = 0.′′22 partially-transmissive coronagraphic mask to sup- press the stellar halo. Here, we took shorter exposures of β Pic (tint ∼ 11.4 s) to better identify and filter out frames with bad AO correction. Our observing sequence consists of ∼ 22 minutes of usable data centered on tran- sit with a field rotation of ∼ 41 degrees. Basic image processing follows steps described above for NaCo data. The PSF halo was saturated out to r ∼ 0.′′32 -- 0.′′36 in H during most of the observations and our sequence suffered periodic seeing bubbles that saturated the halo out to angular separations overlapping with the β Pic b PSF. Thus, we focus on reducing only those H-band frames with less severe halo saturation (rsat < 0.′′36). The Ks observations, obtained at a higher Strehl ratio, never suffered halo saturation. The first of the two H20 sets, suffered from severe periodic seeing bub- bles and thus generally poor AO performance. We iden- tify and remove from analysis frames whose halo flux exceeded the Fmin+3σ, where Fmin is the minimum flux within an aperture covering β Pic b and σ is the disper- sion in this flux: about 10-25% of the frames, depending on the data set in question. 2.3. PSF Subtraction To remove the noisy stellar halo and reveal β Pic b, we process the data with our "adaptive" LOCI (A-LOCI) pipeline (Currie et al. 2012a,b, T. Currie 2013 in prep.). This approach adopts "locally optimized combination of images" (LOCI) formalism (Lafreni`ere et al. 2007b), where we perform PSF subtraction in small annular re- gions (the "subtraction zone") at a time over each im- age. Previously-described A-LOCI components we use here include "subtraction zone centering" (Currie et al. 2012b); "speckle filtering" to identify and remove images with noise structure poorly correlated with that from the science image we are wanting to subtract (Currie et al. 2012b); a moving pixel mask to increase point source throughput and normalize it as a function of azimuthal angle (Currie et al. 2012a). We do not consider a PSF reference library (Currie et al. 2012a) since β Pictoris is our only target. Into A-LOCI as recently utilized in Currie et al. (2012a), we incorporate a component different from but complementary to our "speckle filtering", using singular value decomposition (SVD) to limit the number of images used in a given annular region (i.e. for a given optimiza- tion zone) to construct and subtract a reference. Briefly, in the (A-)LOCI formalism a matrix inversion yields the set of coefficients ck applied to each image making up the reference "image": ck = A−1b. Here, A is the covariance matrix and b is a column matrix defined from i pixels in the "optimization zones" of the j-th reference image i OT section Oj and the science image, OT : bj = Pi i (see Lafreni`ere et al. 2007b). In the previous versions of our codes, we use a simple double-precision matrix inver- sion to invert the covariance matrix and then solve for ck after multiplying by b. Oj In this work, we instead use SVD to rewrite A as UΣVT such that A−1 = VΣ−1UT , where the T super- script stands for the transpose of the matrix. Prior to inversion, we truncate the number of singular values at a predefined cutoff, svdlim. This eigenvalue truncation is very similar to and functions the same as the truncation of principle components, Npca, in the Karhunen-Loeve image projection (KLIP) (Soummer et al. 2012) and has been successfully incorporated before (Marois et al. 2010b). We found that both speckle filtering and SVD truncation within our formalism can yield significant con- trast gains over LOCI and KLIP/Principle Component Analysis (PCA), although in this study at the angular separation of β Pic b (≈ 0.′′45) the gains over LOCI are typically about a factor of 1.5, albeit with substantially higher throughput11. 11 Recently, Amara and Quanz (2012) claimed a contrast gain of ∼ 5× over LOCI using PCA. However, optimal set-ups even within a given formalism like LOCI or PCA/KLIP are very dataset- 3 2.4. Planet Detections Figures 1, 2, and 3 display reduced NaCo and NICI images of β Pic. We detect β Pic b in all datasets (sum- marized in Table 2). To compute the signal-to-noise ra- tio (SNR) for β Pic b, we determine the dispersion, σ, in pixel values of our final image convolved with a gaussian along a ring with width of 1 FWHM at the same angu- lar separation as β Pic b but excluding the planet (e.g. Thalmann et al. 2009), and average the SNR/pixel over the aperture area. For the Gemini-NICI H, Ks, and two [3.1] datasets, the SNRs are thus 6.4, 11, 4.6, and 10, re- spectively. For the J and H-band NaCo data previously presented in Bonnefoy et al. (2013), we achieve SNR ∼ 9 and SNR ∼ 30, respectively. Generally speaking, our 3.8 -- 5 µm NaCo data are deeper than the near-IR NaCo and especially near-IR NICI data, where we detect β Pic b at SNR = 40 in L′ and 22 at M ′, roughly a factor of two higher than previously reported (Currie et al. 2011b; Bonnefoy et al. 2013), gains due to β Pic b now being at a wider projected separation (L′) or post-processing and slightly better observing conditions (M ′). The high SNR detections obtained with NaCo also leverage on re- cent engineering upgrades that substantially improved the instrument's image quality and the stability of its PSF (Girard et al. 2012). The optimal A-LOCI algorithm parameters vary sig- nificantly from dataset to dataset. The rotation gap (∆PA in units of the image full-width half maximum) criterion used to produce most of the images is δ ∼ 0.6 -- 0.65, although it is significantly larger for the J and H data sets (δ = 0.75 -- 0.95). Generally speaking, the opti- mization areas we use NA are significantly smaller (NA = 50-150) than those typically adopted (i.e. NA=300; Lafreni`ere et al. 2007b). We speculate that the pixel masking component of A-LOCI drives the optimal NA settings toward these smaller values since the planet flux (ostensibly within the subtraction zone) no longer signif- icantly biases the coefficient determinations to the point of reducing the planet's SNR. Filtering parameters rcorr and svdlim likewise vary wildly from rcorr = 0 and svdlim = 2.5×10−7 at J to rcorr = 0.9 for the NICI H-band data or svdlim = 2.5×10−2 for the M ′ NaCo data. While the many algorithm free parameters make find- ing an optimal combination difficult and computation- ally expensive, our final image quality is nevertheless extremely sensitive to some values, in particular svdlim and rcorr. As a test, we explored other image process- ing methods -- ADI-based classical PSF subtraction and LOCI. While A-LOCI always yields deeper contrasts, we easily detect β Pic b in the mid-IR NaCo data using any method and only the poorer of the two [3.1] data sets re- quires A-LOCI to yield a better than 4-σ detection (i.e. where σdet = 1.0857/SNR = 0.27 mags). We will present a detailed analysis of image processing methods and al- gorithm parameters in an upcoming study (T. Currie, 2013 in prep.). Adopting the pixel scales listed in Table 1, β Pic b is specific (cf. Lafreni`ere et al. 2007b; Currie et al. 2012a,b). With LOCI, we obtained roughly equivalent SNRs for β Pic b obtained during the same observing run but on a night with poorer ob- serving conditions (29 December 2009) than their test data set (Currie et al. 2011b). Implementing some A-LOCI filtering and pixel masking yields SNR ≈ 30 -- 35. 4 detected at an angular separation of r ∼ 0.′′46 in each data set. The position angle of β Pic b is consistent with previously-listed values (PA ≈ 210o) and in between val- ues for the main disk and the warp, intermediate be- tween the results presented in Currie et al. (2011b) and Lagrange et al. (2012b). While the NICI north position angle on the detector is precisely known and determined from facilty observations, we have not yet used our as- trometric standard observations to derive the NaCo po- sition angle offset, which changes every time NaCo is re- moved from the telescope. To dissuade others from using the poorly calibrated NaCo data and precisely calibrated data (Lagrange et al. 2012b) together, we reserve a de- tailed determination of β Pic b's astrometry and a study of its orbit for a future study. We also detect the β Pic debris disk in each new broadband data set and at [4.05] (Figure 4). We will analyze its properties at a later time as well. 2.5. Planet Photometry To derive β Pic b photometry, we first measured its brightness within an aperture roughly equal to the image FWHM in each case, which was known since we either had AO-corrected standard star observations (NICI H, Ks, and [3.1]), unsaturated images of the primary as seen through the coronagraphic mask (NICI Ks), unsaturated neutral density filter observations (NaCo J, H, L′, and M ′), or unsaturated images of the primary (NaCo L′ and [4.05]). We assessed and corrected for planet throughput losses due to processing by comparing the flux of syn- thetic point sources within this aperture implanted into registered images at the same angular separation as β Pic b before and after processing. To derive β Pic b's throughput and uncertainty in the throughput (σatten), we repeat these measurements at 15 different position angles and adopt the clipped mean of the throughput as our throughput and standard deviation of this mean as its uncertainty. The planet throughput ranges from 0.38 for the J-band data to 0.82 for the [4.05] data and 0.96 for the NICI H-band data, even with aggressive algo- rithm parameters (i.e. δ ∼ 0.6), due to the throughput gains yielded by our pixel masking and the SVD cutoff. For photometric calibration, we followed several dif- ferent approaches. For the NICI data, we used TYC 7594-1689-1 and HD 38921 as photometric standards. We were only able to obtain photometric calibrations for the first of the two [3.1] datasets. For all other data we used the primary star, β Pic, for flux calibration adopt- ing the measurements listed in Bonnefoy et al. (2013). For the J and H NaCo data, we used images of the pri- mary as viewed through the neutral density filter. For the M ′ NaCo data, we obtained neutral density filter observations and very short exposures. While the lat- ter were close to saturation and were probably in the non-linear regime, the implied photometry for β Pic was consistent to within errors. The primary was unsatu- rated in the [4.05]. Finally, for the L′ data, we took 8.372 ms unsaturated images of β Pic for flux calibra- tion. In all cases, we again adopt the clipped mean of individual measurements as our photometric calibration uncertainty, σf luxcal. To compute the photometric un- certainty for each data set, we considered the SNR of our detection, the uncertainty in the planet throughput, and the uncertainty in absolute flux calibration: σ = qσ2 f luxcal. det + σ2 atten + σ2 Table 2 reports our photometry and Table 3 lists sam- ple error budgets for two NICI photometric measure- ments and two NaCo measurements. The relative contri- butions from each source of photometric uncertainty to the total uncertainty are representative of our combined data set. For the [3.09] data, residual speckle noise/sky fluctuations greatly limit the planets SNR and thus σdet is the primary source of photometric uncertainty. For the Ks data, the intrinsic SNR and the two other sources of photometric uncertainty contribute in a more equal pro- portion. The L′ and M ′ data error budgets are charac- teristic of most of our other data, where the photometric uncertainty is primarily due to the absolute photomet- ric calibration and throughput. With the exception of the [3.09] NICI data, the intrinsic SNR of the detection does not dominate the error budget. For the best-quality (mid-IR NaCo) data, the throughput uncertainty was small (≈ 5%) and was never any larger than 15% (J band data) in any data set12. In general, we find fair agreement with previously pub- lished photometry, where our measurements are usually consistent within photometric errors with those reported previously (e.g. mH = 13.32 ± 0.14 and 13.25 ± 0.18 vs. 13.5 ± 0.2 in Bonnefoy et al. 2013). Our L′ photometry is more consistent with Currie et al.'s measurement of mL′=9.73 ± 0.06 than with that listed in Bonnefoy et al. (2013) (mL′=9.5 ± 0.2), though it is nearly identical to that derived for some β Pic b data sets listed in Lagrange et al. (2010). Our [4.05] photometry implies that β Pic b is ∼ 15-20% brighter there than previously assumed (Quanz et al. 2010) and may have a slightly red L′-[4.05] color. The major difference from previous stud- ies, though, is that our photometric errors are consis- tently much smaller. For example, the uncertainty in the [4.05] photometry is reduced to 0.08 mag from 0.23 mag due both to higher SNR detections and lower un- certainty in our derived photometry (e.g. throughput corrections). NICI photometry is also substantially less uncertain than in Boccaletti et al. (2013) because β Pic b is not occulted by the focal plane mask. These lower uncertainties should allow more robust comparisons be- tween β Pic b and other substellar objects and, from modeling, more precise limits on the best-fitting planet atmosphere properties. 3. EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS TO β PIC B 12 In principle, tuning the algorithm parameters to maximize the SNR of β Pic b could introduce additional photometric un- certainties if the planet is in significant residual speckle contami- nation. In such a case, the algorithm parameters maximizing the SNR could instead be the set that maximizes the residual speckle contamination within the the planet aperture while minimizing it elsewhere, especially as the pixel masking technique normalizes the point source throughput but not the noise as a function of az- imuthal angle. However, we do not find substantial differences in the derived photometry if we adopt a default set of algorithm pa- rameters. Furthermore, the parameters maximizing the SNR are never the ones maximizing the planet throughput, and our tun- ing is not just finding the parameter set making pixels within the planet aperture 'noisiest'. Adopting slightly different parameters from the 'optimized' case yields nearly identical photometry. More- over, residual speckle contamination in most data sets is extremely low, and for the mid-IR data the intrinsic SNR is limited by sky background fluctuations in addition to speckles. Our new data allows us to compare the spectral energy distribution of β Pic b to that for the many field L/T- type brown dwarfs as well that for directly-imaged low- surface gravity, low-mass brown dwarf companions and directly-imaged planets. Our goal here is to place β Pic b within the general L/T type spectral sequence, iden- tify departures from this sequence such as those seen for low surface gravity objects like HR 8799 bcde, and iden- tify the substellar object(s) with the best-matched SED. Some bona fide directly-imaged planets like HR 8799 bcde and at least some of the lowest-mass brown dwarfs like 2M 1207 B appear redder/cloudier than their field dwarf counterparts at comparable temperatures (Tef f ≈ 900-1100 K). However, it is unclear whether hotter imaged exoplanets appear different from their (already cloudy) field L dwarf counterparts, and β Pic b provides a test of any such differences. We will use our compar- isons to the L/T dwarf sequence and the SEDs of other substellar objects to inform our atmosphere model com- parisons later to derive planet physical parameters (e.g. Tef f and log(g)). 3.1. Infrared Colors of β Pic b To compare the near-to-mid IR properties of β Pic b with those for other cool, substellar objects, we primarily use the sample of L/T dwarfs compiled by Leggett et al. (2010), which include field dwarfs spec- tral classes between ∼ M7 and T5, corresponding to a range of temperatures between ∼ 2500 K and 700 K. To explore how the β Pic b SED compares to those with other directly-imaged planets/planet candi- dates and very low-mass brown dwarf companions within this temperature range, we include objects listed in Ta- ble 4. These include the directly-imaged planets around HR 8799 (Marois et al. 2008, 2010a; Currie et al. 2011a) and the directly-imaged planet candidate around κ And (Carson et al. 2013). Additionally, we include high mass ratio brown dwarf companions with masses less than the deuterium-burning limit (∼ 13 -- 14 MJ ) and higher- mass companions whose youth likely favors a lower surface gravity than for field brown dwarfs, a differ- ence that affect the objects' spectra (e.g. Luhman et al. 2007). Among these objects are 1RXJ 1609B, AB Pic B, and Luhman 16 B (Lafreni´ere et al. 2008; Chauvin et al. 2005; Luhman et al. 2013). Table 5 compiles photometry for all of these low surface gravity objects. Figure 5 compares the IR colors of β Pic b (dark blue diamonds) to those for field M dwarfs (small black dots), field L0 -- L5 dwarfs (grey dots), field L5.1- L9 dwarfs (asterisks), T dwarfs (small light-grey dots), and planets/low-mass young brown dwarfs (light-blue squares). The J-H/H-Ks colors for β Pic b appear slightly blue in J-H and red in H-Ks compared to field L0 -- L5 dwarfs, though the difference here is not as large as was found in Bonnefoy et al. (2013). Other young substellar objects appear to have similar near-IR colors, in particular κ And b, GSC 06214 B, USco CTIO 108B, 2M 1207A, and Luhman 16 B, whose spectral types range between M8 and T0.5. The mid-IR colors of β Pic b (top-right and bottom panels) show a more complicated situation. In J-Ks/Ks- L′ and H-Ks/Ks-L′, β Pic b lies along the field L/T dwarf locus with colors in between those for L0 -- L5 and L5.1 -- L9 dwarfs, overlapping in color with κ And b, 1RXJ 5 1609B, GSC 06214B, HR 8799 d, and 2M 1207 B. Com- pared to the few field L/T dwarfs from the Leggett et al. sample with M ′ photometry, β Pic b appears rather red, most similar in Ks-M ′ color to GSC 06214 B. The color-magnitude diagram positions of β Pic b (Fig- ure 6) better clarify how its near-to-mid SED compares to the field L/T dwarf sequence and to very low-mass (and gravity?) young substellar objects. In general, compared to the field L dwarf sequence, β Pic b appears progres- sively redder at mid-IR wavelengths. Similar to the case for GSC 06214 B (Bailey et al. 2013), β Pic b appears overluminous compared to the entire L/T dwarf sequence in the mid-IR. 3.2. Comparisons to SEDs of Other Substellar Objects To further explore how the SED of β Pic b agrees with/departs from the field L/T dwarf sequence and other young substellar objects, we first compare its pho- tometry to spectra from the SPeX library (Cushing et al. 2005; Rayner et al. 2009) of brown dwarfs with data overlapping with our narrowband mid-IR filters ([3.09] and [4.05]) spanning spectral classes between L1 and L5: 2MASS J14392836+1929149 (L1), Kelu-1AB (L2), 2MASS J15065441+1321060 (L3), 2MASS J15074769- 1627386 (L5). To compare the β Pic b pho- tometry with cooler L dwarfs, we add combined IRTF/SpeX and Subaru/IRCS spectra from 1 to 4.1 µm for 2MASS J08251968+2115521 (L7.5) and DENIS- P J025503.3-470049 (L8) (Cushing et al. 2008). Finally, we add spectra for the low surface-gravity L4.5 dwarf, 2MASSJ22244381-0158521 (Cushing et al. 2008). To highlight differences between β Pic b and these L dwarfs, we scale the flux densities for each of these standards to match β Pic b at ∼ 2.15 µm (Ks band). To convert our photometry derived in magnitudes to flux density units, we use the zeropoint fluxes listed in Table 6. The JHKs and L′M ′(4.78 µm) zeropoints are from Cohen et al. (2003) and Tokunaga and Vacca (2005), respectively. We base the other zeropoints off of Rieke et al. (2008), although alternate sources (e.g. Cohen et al. 1995) yield nearly identical values. Because the overlap in wavelengths between β Pic and these ob- jects is not uniform, we do not perform a rigorous fit between the two, finding the scaling factor that mini- mizes the χ2 value defined from the planet flux density, comparison object flux density, and photometric errors in both. Rather, we focus on a simple first-order com- parison between β Pic b and the comparison objects to motivate detailed atmospheric modeling later in Section 4. Figure 7 (left panel) compares photometry for β Pic b to spectra for field L1 -- L5 dwarfs. While the L1 standard slightly overpredicts the flux density at J band, the other three early/mid L standards match the β Pic b near- IR SED quite well, indicating a "near-IR spectral type" of ∼ L2 -- L5. The L7.5 and L8 standards also produce reasonable matches, although they tend to underpredict the brightness at J band (right panel). However, all standards have difficulty matching the β Pic b SED from 3 -- 4 µm. In particular, the β Pic b flux density from ∼ 3 to ∼ 5 µm is nearly constant, whereas it rises through 4 µm and then steeply drops in all six stan- dards depicted here. Focused on only β Pic b photom- etry at 3.8 -- 4.1 µm, the "mid-IR spectral type" is hard 6 to define, the low surface gravity L4.5 dwarf bears the greatest resemblance, although we fail to identify good matches at all wavelengths with any of our spectral tem- plates, where the 3.1 µm, L′, and [4.05] data points are the most problematic. While none of our standards have measurements fully overlapping with the M ′ filter, the flux densities at 5.1 µm indicate that they may have a very hard time simultaneously reproducing our measure- ments at all four filters between 3 and 5 µm. Although non-equilibrium carbon chemistry can flatten the spectra of low surface gravity L/T dwarfs (Skemer et al. 2012), its effect is to weaken the methane absorption trough at ∼ 3.3 µm and suppress emission at ∼ 5 µm. Thus, it is unclear whether this effect can explain the enhanced emission at ∼ 3.1 µm (mostly outside of the CH4 ab- sorption feature to begin with) and 5 µm. To understand whether β Pic b's SED is unique even amongst other very low-mass substellar objects, we com- pare our photometry to that for companions listed in Table 4 that have photometry from 1 µm through ∼ 4 -- 5 µm: HR 8799 bcd, κ And b, 1RXJ 1609 B, GSC 06214B, HIP 78530 B, 2M 1207A/B, HR 7329B, and AB Pic. Two objects -- 1RXJ 1609 B and GSC 06214B -- have 3.1 µm photometry: 1RXJ 1609 B from (Bailey et al. 2013) and κ And b has [4.05] from data obtained by T. C. (M[4.05] = 9.45 ± 0.20) (Bonnefoy, Currie et al., 2013 in prep.). The two far-right columns of Table 5 lists the re- duced χ2 and goodness-of-fit statistics between β Pic b's JHKsL′ ([3.1],[4.05]) photometry, while Figure 8 displays these comparisons for κ And b, 1RXJ 1609B, and GSC 06214B, which are all thought to be low sur- face gravity companions with Tef f ∼ 1700 K, 1800 K, and 2200 K (Carson et al. 2013; Lafreni`ere et al. 2010; Bowler et al. 2011; Bailey et al. 2013). Overall, κ And b provides the best match to β Pic b's photometry, re- quires negligible flux scaling, and is essentially the same within the 68% confidence limit (C.L.) (χ2 = 0.946, C.L. = 0.186), although the large photometric uncertainties in the near-IR limit the robustness of these conclusions. The companion to 1RXJ 1609 likewise produces a very good match (χ2 = 1.369, C.L. = 0.287), while the slightly more luminous (and massive) GSC 06214B appears to be much bluer, (relatively) overluminous in L′ and M ′ (or, conversely, overluminous at JHKs) by ∼ 30%. In com- parison, the cooler (Tef f ≈ 900-1100 K) exoplanets HR 8799 bcd provide far poorer matches (χ2 ∼ 6 -- 52). Still, it is unclear whether any object matches β Pic b's photometry at all wavelengths: both of the objects for which we have [3.1] data, GSC 06214B and 1RXJ 1609B, are still slightly underluminous here. Moreover, the best- matching companions -- κ And b and 1RXJ 1609B -- are still not identical, as the scaling factors between β Pic b's spectrum and these companions' spectra that minimize χ2 are ∼ 0.83 and 0.53, respectively. While compan- ions with identical temperatures but radii 10% and 30% larger than β Pic b would achieve this scaling, κ And b and 1RXJ 1609B are respectively older and younger than β Pic b, whereas for a given initial entropy of for- mation planet radii are expected to decrease with time (Spiegel and Burrows 2012). In summary, young (low surface gravity?), low-mass objects may provide a better match to β Pic b's pho- tometry than do field dwarfs, especially those with tem- peratures well above 1000 K but slightly below 2000 K (κ And b, 1RXJ 1609 B). However, we fail to find a match (within error bars) between the planet's photom- etry spanning the full range of wavelengths for which we have data, especially at ∼ 3 µm. As the planet spectra depend critically on temperature, surface gravity, clouds and (as we shall see) dust particle sizes, our comparisons imply that β Pic b may differ from most young substellar objects in one of these respects. Next, we turn to detailed atmospheric modeling to identify the set of atmospheric parameters that best fit the β Pic b data. 4. PLANET ATMOSPHERE MODELING To further explore the physical properties of β Pic b, we compare its photometry to planet atmosphere models adopting a range of surface gravities, effective tempera- tures, and cloud prescriptions/dust. For a given sur- face gravity and effective temperature, a planet's emitted spectrum depends primarily on the atmosphere's com- position, the structure of its clouds, and the sizes of the dust particles of which the clouds are comprised (Burrows et al. 2006). For simplicity, we assume solar abundances except where noted and leave consideration of anomalous abundances for future work. Based on β Pic b's expected luminosity (log(Lp/L⊙) ∼ -3.7 to -4, Lagrange et al. 2010; Bonnefoy et al. 2013) and age, it is likely too hot (Tef f ∼ 1400-1800 K) for non-equilibrium carbon chemistry to play a dominant role (Hubeny and Burrows 2007; Galicher et al. 2011). Therefore, our atmosphere models primarily differ in their treatment of clouds and the dust particles entrained in clouds. For each model, we explore a range of surface gravities and effective temperatures. 4.1. Limiting Cases: The Burrows et al. (2006) E60 and A60 Models and AMES-DUSTY Models 4.1.1. Model Descriptions We begin by applying an illustrative collection of previously-developed atmosphere models to β Pic b. These models will produce limiting cases for the planet's cloud structure and typical dust grain size, which we re- fine in Section 4.2. To probe the impact of cloud thick- ness, we first adopt a (large) modal particle size of 60 µm and consider three different cloud models: the standard chemical equilibrium atmosphere thin-cloud models from Burrows et al. (2006), which successfully reproduces the spectra of field L dwarfs, moderately-thick cloud models from Madhusudhan et al. (2011), and thick cloud mod- els used in Currie et al. (2011a). To investigate the im- pact of particle size, we then apply the AMES-DUSTY models. The DUSTY models lack any dust grain sed- imentation, such that the dust grains are everywhere in the atmosphere, similar to the distribution of dust grains entrained in thick clouds. However, they adopt far smaller dust grains than do the thick cloud mod- els from Madhusudhan et al. (2011) and Currie et al. (2011a), where the grains are submicron in size and fol- low the interstellar grain size distribution (Allard et al. 2001). All models described here and elsewhere in the paper assume that the planet is in hydrostatic and ra- diative equilibrium. None of them consider irradiation from the star, as this is likely unimportant at β Pic b's orbital separation. Table 7 summarizes the range of at- mospheric properties we consider for each model. The Burrows et al. (2006) E60 Thin Cloud, Large Dust Particle Models -- As described in Burrows et al. (2006) and later works (e.g. Currie et al. 2011a; Madhusudhan et al. 2011), the Model E60 case assumes that the clouds are confined to a thin layer, where the thickness of the flat part of the cloud encom- passes the condensation points of different species with different temperature-pressure point intercepts. Above and below this flat portion, the cloud shape function de- cays as the -6 and -10 powers respectively, so that the clouds have scale heights of ∼ 1/7th and 1/11th that of the gas. We adopt a modal particle size of 60 µm and a particle size distribution drawn from terrestrial water clouds (Deirmendjian 1964). We consider surface grav- ities with log(g) = 4 and 4.5 and temperatures with a range of Tef f = 1400 -- 1800 K in increments of 100 K. (2011) The Madhusudhan et al. AE60 Moderately-Thick Cloud, Large Dust Parti- cle Models -- Described in Madhusudhan et al. (2011), the Model AE60 case assumes a shallower cloud shape function of su = 1, such that the cloud scale height is half that of the gas as a whole. We again adopt a modal particle size of 60 µm and the same particle size distribution. We consider surface gravities with log(g) = 4 and 4.5 and temperatures between Tef f = 1000 -- 1700 K in increments of 100 K. The Burrows et al. (2006) A60 Thick Cloud, Large Dust Particle Models -- As described in Currie et al. (2011a), the Model A60 case differs in that it assumes that the clouds extend with a scale height that tracks that of the gas as a whole. Below the flat part of the cloud, the shape function decays as the -10 power as in the E60 and AE60 models, although devi- ations from this do not affect the emergent spectrum. Here, we consider surface gravities with log(g) = 4 and 4.5 and temperatures with a range of Tef f = 1000-1700 K in increments of 100 K. AMES-DUSTY Thick-Cloud, Small Dust Par- ticle Limit -- The AMES-DUSTY atmosphere models (Allard et al. 2001) leverage on the PHOENIX radiative transfer code (Hauschildt and Baron 1999) and explore the limiting case where dust grains do not sediment/rain out in the atmosphere. Unlike the Burrows et al. (2006) models and those considered in later works (e.g. Spiegel and Burrows 2012), the AMES-DUSTY models adopt a interstellar grain size distribution favoring far tinier dust grains with higher opacities. The grains' higher opacities reduce the planet's radiation at shorter wavelengths. Thus, these models have dramatically different near-IR planet spectra from the E/A/AE60 type models with larger modal grain sizes even at the same temperatures and gravities (cf. Burrows et al. 2006; Currie et al. 2011a). Here we consider AMES-DUSTY models with log(g) = 3.5, 4, and 4.5 and Tef f = 1000 -- 2000 K (∆Tef f =100 K). 4.1.2. Fitting Method To transform the DUSTY spectra into predicted flux density measurements (at 10 pc), we convolve the spec- tra over the filter response functions and scale by a di- lution factor of f = (Rplanet/10 pc)2. We consider a range of planet radii between 0.9 RJ and 2 RJ . Like- wise, we convolve the E60 and A60 model spectra over filter response functions. The E60 models (as do all 7 other Burrows et al. 2006 and Madhusudhan et al. 2011 models) adopt a mapping between planet radius and surface gravity/temperature set by the Burrows et al. (1997) planet evolution models. To explore departures from these models, we allow the the radius to vary by an additional scale factor of 0.7 to 1.7. For most of our grid, this translates into a radius range of 0.9 to 2 RJ . Our atmosphere model fitting follows methods in Currie et al. (2011a,b), where we quantify the model fits with the χ2 statistic, χ2 = n X i=0 (fdata,i − Fmodel,i)2/σ2 data,i. (1) We weight each datapoint equally. Because our pho- tometric calibration fully considers uncertainties due to the signal-to-noise ratio, the processing-induced attentu- ation, and the absolute photometric calibration, we do not set a 0.1 mag floor to σ for each data point as we have done previously. We determine which models are formally consistent with the data by comparing the resulting χ2 value to that identifying the 68% and identify those that can clearly be ruled out by computed the 95% confidence limit. Note here that these limits are significantly more strin- gent compared to the ones we adopted in Currie et al. (2011a). Treating the planet radius as a free parameter, we have five degrees of freedom for seven data points, leading to χ2 68% = 5.87 and χ2 95% = 11.06. ' 4.1.3. Results Table 8 summarizes our fitting results using the E60, AE60, A60, and DUSTY models. Figure 9 displays some of these fitting results, where the left-hand panels show the χ2 distributions with the 68% and 95% confidence limits indicated by horizontal lines dashed and dotted lines. The right-hand panels and middle-left panel show the best-fitting models for each atmosphere prescription. A successful model must match three key properties of the observed SED: (1) At 3 -- 5 µm, the SED is relatively flat, (2) at 1 -- 3 µm, the spectral slope is relatively shal- low, and (3) the overall normalization of the 3 -- 5 µm flux relative to the 1 -- 3 µm flux must match the data. For the E60, AE60, and A60 models, we find χ2 min- ima at log(g) = 4 -- 4.5 and Tef f = 1400 K in each case with radius scaling factors, the constant we multiple the nominal Burrows et al. planet radii, between 1.185 and 1.680. For the Burrows et al. (1997) evolutionary mod- els, these scaling factors imply planet radii between ∼ 1.8 and 2 RJ , at the upper extrema of our grid in radius. Figure 9 illustrates the impact on the SED of chang- ing cloud models, given a fixed grain size. The best-fit temperature does not vary dramatically because, roughly speaking, the relative fluxes at 1 -- 3 µm and 3 -- 5µm are determined by the SED's blackbody envelope. However, cloud thickness dramatically affects the depths of absorp- tion bands superimposed on that envelope. Atmosphere models presented here do not feature temperature inver- sions. As such, high opacity molecular lines have low flux densities because they originate at high altitudes where the temperature is low. When clouds are thin, op- tical depth unity is achieved at very different altitudes in and outside of absorption bands such as those at 3.3µm 8 (methane) and 4.5 µm (primarily CO), and the bands appear deep. For a fixed observed effective temperature, thicker clouds translate into hotter temperature profiles (i.e. at a given pressure in the atmosphere, the temperature is higher) (e.g. Madhusudhan et al. 2011). The total Rosse- land mean optical depth of the atmosphere at a given pressure is higher (Madhusudhan et al. 2011). As the clouds become thicker, the τ = 1 surface also is more uni- form, such that molecular features wash out and the spec- trum overall appears flatter and more like a blackbody (Burrows et al. 2006). Hence, the prominent molecular absorption bands seen in the best-fit E60 (thin cloud) model are substantially reduced in the A60 (thick cloud) model, with AE60 lying in between. The planet's flat 3 -- 5 µm SED is best fit by A60. Although the χ2 minima for all four of the models we consider are sharply peaked, none yield fits falling within the 68% confidence interval. The fits from E60 and AE60 are particularly poor, ruled out at a greater than 5-σ level, whereas the A60 model quantitatively does bet- ter but still is ruled out as an acceptably-fitting model (C.L. ∼ 3.9-σ). The best-fit AMES-DUSTY model fits the SED even better than A60, with parameters of Tef f = 1700 and log(g) = 3.5 and a radius of r = 1.35 RJ , sim- ilar parameters to those found in Bonnefoy et al. (2013). However, the best-fit DUSTY model still falls outside the 68% confidence limit (C.L. = 0.84). These exercises suggest that the atmospheric parameters assumed in the models need to be modified in order to better reproduce the β Pic b photometry. To achieve this, we restrict ourselves to thick clouds and consider more carefully the impact of dust size. 4.2. A4, Thick Cloud/Small Dust Models 4.2.1. The Effect of Small Dust Particles Our analyses in the previous section show the extreme mismatch between standard L dwarf atmosphere models assuming thin clouds and large dust particles and the data. While our χ2 values for the Burrows thick cloud, large dust particle models are systematically much lower, they likewise are a poor match to the data. In contrast, fits from the AMES-DUSTY models only narrowly lie outside the 68% confidence interval. A closer inspection of the best-fitting models in each case (right-hand panels) illustrates how they fail. The main difficulty with matching these models to β Pic b spectrum is the planet's flat SED from 2 µm to 5 µm, where models tend to underpredict the flux density at 3.1 µm and/or M ′. The slope from J to Ks is also a challenge. Reducing dust sizes can further fill in absorp- tion troughs by increasing the opacities of the clouds. The AMES-DUSTY model, however, appears to over- correct as its spectrum exhibits sharp peaks due to its submicron sized grains that degrade its fit to the data. Therefore, we consider grain sizes intermediate between those in A60 and AMES-DUSTY (e.g. ∼ 1 -- 30 µm). A4 Thick Cloud, Small Dust Particle Models -- As the primary difference between these models is the typical/modal particle size, we here introduce a new set of atmosphere models with the same A-type, thick cloud assumption but with modal particle sizes slightly larger than those characteristic of dust in the AMES-DUSTY models but significantly smaller than previous Burrows models. We nominally adopt 4 µm as our new modal particle size, comparable in wavelength to the peak flux density of β Pic b in Fν units. Thus, we denote these models as "A4", thick-cloud, small dust particle models. Figure 10 illustrates the effect of dust on the planet spectrum for modal particle sizes of 3, 5, 30 and 50 µm and a temperature and surface gravity consistent with that expected to reflect β Pic b based on planet cool- ing models (Tef f = 1600 K, log(g)=3.8-4, r ∼ 1.5 RJ ) (Burrows et al. 1997; Baraffe et al. 2003; Lagrange et al. 2010; Spiegel and Burrows 2012; Bonnefoy et al. 2013). As particle sizes decrease, the water absorption troughs at 1.8 µm and 2.5 µm diminish. Likewise filled in is the deep absorption trough at ∼ 3.3 µm and 4.5 µm that is usually diagnostic of carbon chemistry (e.g. Hubeny and Burrows 2007; Galicher et al. 2011). Over- all, the spectrum flattens and becomes redder (shorter wavelength emission originates at higher altitudes), with weaker emission and a steeper slope at J to Ks. This reddening explains the difference in best-fit effective tem- perature between the AMES-DUSTY model and the 60 µm dust models. 4.2.2. Model Fitting Procedure We follow the steps outlined in Currie et al. (2011a), where we perform two runs: one fixing the planet radius to the Burrows et al. (1997) hot-start predictions for a given Tef f and log(g) and another where we consider a range of planet radii (as in the previous section). For the fixed-radii modeling, the 68% and 95% confidence limits now lie at χ2 = 7.01 and 12.6, respectively, whereas they are at 5.87 and 11.06 for the varying-radii fits as before. Similar to the Burrows A/E60 model runs, we consider a range of temperatures between 1400 K and 1900 K. To explore whether or not the fits are sensitive to surface gravity, we consider models with log(g) = 3.6, 3.8, 4, and log(g) = 4.25. For the age of β Pic (formally, 8 to 20 Myr), this surface gravity range fully explores the masses (in the hot-start formalism) allowed given the radial- velocity dynamical mass limits (Lagrange et al. 2012a). To further explore the effect that carbon chemistry may have on our planet spectra, we take the best-fitting model from the above exercise, significantly enhance the methane abundances over solar and re-run a small grid of temperatures based on that, to determine if depar- tures from solar abundances may yield a wider range of acceptable atmosphere parameters. Because variations in molecular abundances affect the depths of molecular absorption bands, we expect that such variations may improve our fit. 4.2.3. Results Figures 11 and 12 and Table 8 present our results for fitting the β Pic b data with the A4, thick cloud/small dust models. Quantitatively, these models better repro- duce the β Pic b SED. Fixing the planet radius to val- ues assumed in the Burrows et al. (1997) planet cooling model, we find one atmosphere model -- log(g) = 3.8, Tef f = 1600 K -- consistent with the data to within the 68% confidence interval. A wide range of models are consis- tent with the data at the 95% confidence limit, covering ± 0.2 dex in surface gravity and ± 100 K in temperature. We can slightly improve upon these fits if we allow the planet radius to freely vary. In this case, the best- fitting models yield a slightly higher surface gravity of log(g) = 4 -- 4.25 but the same temperature of 1600 K. But in contrast to the fixed-radius case above, a wide range of models are consistent with the data at the 68% confidence limit. In particular, all surface gravities con- sidered in our model grid are consistent with the data provided that the temperature is 1600 K and the radius is rescaled accordingly: log(g) = 3.6 -- 4.25, Tef f = 1600 K. Another set of models with the full range of surface gravities and 250 K spread in temperature (1500 -- 1750 K) are marginally consistent with the data. The methane-enhanced models are shown in Figure 13 for log(g)=4 and Tef f = 1575 -- 1650 K. The 1575 K and 1600 K models (Figure 13) likewise produce good fits to the data (χ2 = 5.13 -- 5.3), where the 1650 K model barely misses the 68% cutoff. Thus, while best-fitting solar abundance models appear narrowly peaked at Tef f = 1600 K, the range in temperature enclosing the 68% confidence interval is larger when non-solar abundances are considered, at least extending from 1575 K to almost 1650 K. Changes in molecular abundances, as expected, allow us to very slightly improve the SED fit. However, thick clouds and small dust grains are likely still needed to match the emission from β Pic b, since given molecules (i.e. CH4) by themselves do not change fluxes compara- bly at 1 -- 3 µm and 3 -- 5 µm. In summary, adopting the Burrows et al. (1997) hot- start models to set our planet radii and the A4 thick cloud/small dust atmosphere models, we derive log(g) = 3.8 and Tef f = 1600 K for β Pic b. Allowing the radius to vary and considering non-solar carbon abundances we derive log(g) = 3.6 -- 4.25 and Tef f = 1575 -- 1650 K, mean- ing that the planet temperature is well constrained but the surface gravity is not. However, in Section 5 we nar- row the range of surface gravities to log(g) = 3.8 ± 0.2, as higher surface gravities imply planet masses ruled out by dynamical estimates. 4.2.4. Varying Grain Sizes and Fits Over Other Model Parameter Space The models considered in the previous subsections as- sume thick clouds, dust grains with a modal size of 4 µm, and (in most cases) solar abundances. Although we achieve statistically significant fits to the β Pic b pho- tometry with these models, our exploration of model pa- rameter space is still limited. While an exhaustive pa- rameter space search is beyond the scope of this paper, here we argue that models either thick clouds or small dust grains are unlikely to produce good-fitting models. Thus, small grains and thick clouds are likely important components of β Pic b's atmosphere required in order to fit the planet's spectrum. To consider the robustness of our results concerning the modal grain size, we also ran some model fits for modal particle sizes of 3 µm, 5 µm, 10 µm, and 30 µm. The models with 3 and 5 µm modal sizes yielded fits slightly worse than those with modal sizes of 4 µm. For example, models with modal sizes of < a > = 3 and 5 µm, Tef f = 1600 K, log(g) = 3.8 and a freely-varying planet radius yield χ2 6.31 and 6.28, respectively. These values lie slightly outside the 68% confidence interval, although they are still smaller than those from the best- 9 fit DUSTY models. In contrast, models with < a > = 10 µm and 30 µm fit the data significantly worse (χ2 = 10.0 and 19.6, respectively). Similarly, our investigations show that small dust grains do not obviate the need to assume thick, A-type clouds in our atmosphere models. For example, adopting the AE-type cloud prescription, modal particle sizes of 5 µm, a temperature of Tef f = 1600 K, and a surface gravity of log(g) = 3.8 -- 4, our model fits are substanti- ailly worse than the A4-type models and even the AMES- DUSTY models and are easily ruled out (χ2 ∼ 15 -- 40). The AE-type cloud prescription fails to reproduce the β Pic b spectrum because by confining clouds to a thinner layer the τ = 1 surface varies too much in and out of molecular absorption features such as CH4 and CO. In disagreement with the β Pic b SED, the AE model spec- tra thus have suppressed emission at ≈ 3 µm and 5 µm and an overall shape looking less like a blackbody. In contrast, non-solar abundances may slightly widen the range of parameter space (in radius, temperature, gravity, etc.) yielding good fits. The methane-rich model from the previous section adopting < a > = 5 µm instead of 4 µm, log(g) = 3.8, and Tef f = 1600 K still yields a fit in agreement with the data to within the 68% confidence limit (χ2 = 5.59). Thus, within our atmosphere model- ing approach we need 1) grains several microns in size, comparable to the typical sizes of grains in debris disks, and 2) thick clouds to yield fits consistent with the data to within the 68% confidence limit. These results are not strongly sensitive to chemical abundances although varying the range of abundances may slightly widen the corresponding range of other parameter space (in tem- perature, gravity, etc.) yielding good-fitting models. 5. PLANET RADII, LUMINOSITIES, MASSES, AND EVOLUTION From the set of models that reproduce the β Pic b SED to the 68% confidence interval, we derive a range of planet radii, luminosities and inferred masses. The planet radii for each model run are given in Table 8. In- terestingly, all of our 1-σ solutions fall on or about R ∼ 1.65 RJ with very little dispersion (± ∼ 0.05 dex). If we consider the range of radii for a given atmosphere model consistent with the data to within the 68% (or 95%) confidence interval regardless of whether the given radius is the best-fit one, then the range in accept- able radii marginally broadens: r = 1.65 ± 0.06. Note that these radii are larger than those inferred for HR 8799 bcde based either on its luminosity and hot-start cooling tracks (Marois et al. 2008, 2010a) or from at- mosphere modeling, where in Currie et al. (2011a) and Madhusudhan et al. (2011) our best-fit models typically had R ∼ 1.3 RJ . The range in inferred planet luminosi- ties is even narrower, The values inferred from our best- fit models center on log(L/L⊙)= -3.80 with negligible intrinsic dispersion (± 0.01 dex). The uncertainty in β Pic's distance affects both our radius and luminosity de- terminations. Treating the distance uncertainty (± 1 pc) as a separate, additive source of error, β Pic b's range in radii is 1.65 ± 0.06 RJ and its luminosity is log(L/L⊙)= -3.80 ± 0.02. From our best-fit surface gravities and inferred radii, we can derive the mass of the planets inferred from our modeling. Adopting the hot-start formalism with- 10 out rescaling the radius, our modeling implies a best- fit planet mass of ∼ 7 MJ ; the range covering the 95% confidence limit of 5 -- 9 MJ . If we allow the radius to freely vary, we derive a range of 4 MJ to 18.7 MJ , where the spread in mass reflects primarily the spread in surface gravity from best-fitting models (log(g) = 3.6 -- 4.25). However, RV data limits β Pic b's mass to be less than 15 MJ if its semimajor axis is less than 10 AU , which appears to be the case (Lagrange et al. 2012a; Chauvin et al. 2012; Bonnefoy et al. 2013). Thus, limit- ing the atmosphere models to those whose implied masses do not in violate the RV upper limits (ones with log(g) = 3.6 -- 4), our best-estimated (68% confidence limit) planet masses are ∼ 7+4 −3 MJ. Planets cool and contract as a function of time, and we can compare our inferred luminosities and radii to planet cooling models. Figure 14 compares the inferred planet luminosity to the hot-start planet evolution mod- els from Baraffe et al. (2003). For context, we also show the luminosities of other 5 -- 100 Myr old companions with masses that (may) lie below 15 MJ : GSC 06214 B, 1RXJ 1609 B, HR 8799 bcde, AB Pic B, and κ And b. From our revised luminosity estimate, the Baraffe et al. (2003) hot-start models imply a mass range of ∼ 8 -- 12 MJ if the planet's age is the same as the star's inferred age (12+8 If we use the Burrows et al. (1997) hot-start models, we obtain nearly identical results of 9 -- 13 MJ . These masses are slightly higher than most of the implied masses from our atmo- sphere modeling but still broadly consistent with them and with the dynamical mass upper limits of 15 MJ from Lagrange et al. (2012a). Note also that the luminosities and planet radii are completely inconsistent with pre- dictions from low-entropy, cold-start models for planet evolution. −4 Myr; Zuckerman et al. 2001). Still, the righthand panel of Figure 14 highlights one possible complication with our results, namely that our best-estimated planet radii are near the upper end of the predicted range for 5 -- 10 MJ companions in the hot- start formalism. For the hot-start models presented in Burrows et al. (1997) and Baraffe et al. (2003), 5 -- 10 MJ companions are predicted to have radii of ∼ 1.5 -- 1.6 RJ . For the hot-start models presented in Spiegel and Burrows (2012), the predicted range for 5 -- 10 MJ planets covers ≈ 1.4 -- 1.5 MJ 13. To reduce the planet radius of ∼ 1.65 RJ by ∼ 10% while yielding the same luminosity requires raising the effective temperature from ≈ 1600 K to ∼ 1700 K. This is a small change and atmospheric modeling of β Pic b and similar substellar objects is still in its early stages. Thus, it is quite plausible that future modeling efforts, leveraging on additional observations of β Pic b and those of other planets with comparable ages and luminosities, will find quantitatively better fitting solutions that im- ply smaller planet radii and higher temperatures. We consider this to be the most likely explanation. 13 This mismatch does not mean that the AMES-DUSTY mod- els, whose fits to the data imply planet radii of ≈ 1.3 RJ and lie just outside the 68% confidence limit, are preferable. The best- fit AMES-DUSTY radii lie below the radii predicted for 5 -- 10 MJ objects at β Pic b's age and are only consistent for 'warm-start' models that imply lower luminosities and colder temperatures than otherwise inferred from the AMES-DUSTY fits. Alternatively, we can bring the atmosphere modeling- inferred radius into more comfortable agreement with hot-start evolutionary models if β Pic b is ≈ 7 Myr old or less. For a system age of ≈ 12 Myr, this is consistent with it forming late in the evolution of the protoplan- etary disk that initially surrounded the primary. Even adopting the lower limit on β Pic's age (8 Myr), β Pic b may still need to be younger than the star. While most signatures of protoplanetary disks around 1 -- 2 M⊙ stars disappear within 3 -- 5 Myr, some ∼ 10 -- 20% of such stars retain their disks through 5 Myr (Currie et al. 2009; Currie and Sicilia-Aguilar 2011; Fedele et al. 2010). Sev- eral 1 -- 2 M⊙ members of Sco-Cen and h and χ Persei ap- parently have even retained their disks for more than 10 Myr (Pecaut et al. 2012; Bitner et al. 2010; Currie et al. 2007), comparable to or greater than the age of β Pic. Models for even rapid planet formation by core accre- tion predict that several Myrs elapse before the cores are massive enough to undergo runaway gas accretion at β Pic-like separations (Kenyon and Bromley 2009; Bromley and Kenyon 2011). In Figure 14 the open circles depict a case where β Pic b formed after 5 Myr, effectively making the planet 5 Myr younger than the star, where the implied masses and radii overlap better with our atmospheric modeling- inferred values. The overlap is even better for some hot- start models such as COND, which predict larger planet radii at ≈ 5 -- 10 Myr than depicted here. Note that a young β Pic b as depicted in Figure 14 with an implied mass mass of M ≥ 5 MJ is still consistent with a scenario where the planet produces the warped secondary disk (c.f. Dawson et al. 2011). 6. DISCUSSION 6.1. Summary of Results This paper presents and analyzes new/archival VLT/NaCo and Gemini/NICI 1 -- 5 µm photometry for β Pictoris b, These data allow a detailed comparison be- tween β Pic b's SED and that of field brown dwarfs and other low-mass substellar objects such as directly imaged planets/candidates around HR 8799 and κ And. Using a range of planet atmosphere models, we then constrain β Pic b's temperature, surface gravity and cloud proper- ties. Our study yields the following primary results. • 1. - The near-IR (JHKs) colors of β Pic b appear fairly consistent with the field L/T dwarf sequence. Compared to other young, low-mass substellar ob- jects, β Pic b's near-IR colors bear the most resem- blance to late M to early T dwarfs such as Luh- man 16B and κ And b. From its near-IR colors and color-magnitude positions, β Pic b's near-IR properties most directly resemble those of a L2 -- L5 dwarf. • 2. - β Pic b's mid-IR properties identify a signifi- cant departure from the field L/T dwarf sequence. The planet is slightly overluminous at L′ and signif- icantly overluminous at M ′, with deviations from the field L dwarf sequence matched only by GSC 06214B and κ And b. The mid-IR portion of β Pic b's SED appears more like that of a late L dwarf or low surface gravity mid L dwarf. The broad- band JHKsL′ photometry for β Pic b also closely resembles that of κ And b. However, it is unclear whether any object matches β Pic b's SED at all wavelengths for which we have measurements. Its 3.1 µm brightness and 3.8 -- 5 µm spectral shape are particularly difficult to match. • 3. -- Compared to limiting-case atmosphere mod- els E60 (large dust confined to very thin clouds), AE60/A60 (large dust confined to moderately- thick/thick clouds) and DUSTY (copious small dust everywhere in the atmosphere), β Pic b ap- pears to have evidence for thick clouds consistent with a high Tef f and low surface gravity. We fail to find any E60/AE60/A60 model providing statisti- cally significant fits over a surface gravity range of log(g) = 4 -- 4.5 and any Tef f . The DUSTY models come much closer to yielding statistically signifi- cant fits but mismatch the planet flux at J, Ks, [3.1], and M ′. From these fiducial comparisons, we infer that β Pic b's atmosphere shows evidence for clouds much thicker than those assumed in the E60 models but is slightly less dusty than the DUSTY models imply. • 4. -- Using thick cloud models with particle sizes slightly larger than those found in the interstellar medium (< a > = 4 µm), we can match β Pic b's SED in both the near and mid IR. Assuming planet radii appropriate for the Burrows et al. (1997) 'hot- start' models, we derive log(g) = 3.80 and Tef f = 1600 K for β Pic b. Allowing the radius to freely vary, leaves the surface gravity essentially uncon- strained, where models consistent with the data at the 68% confidence limit include log(g) = 3.6 -- 4.25 and Tef f = 1600 K. Considering departures from solar abundances and eliminating models that im- ply masses ruled out by dynamical estimates, the acceptably fitting range of atmosphere parameters cover log(g) = 3.6 -- 4 and Tef f = 1575 -- 1650 K. • 5. -- Using our best-fit atmosphere models and eliminating models inconsistent with β Pic b's dy- namical mass upper limit, within the hot-start for- malism we derive a mass of 7 MJ for a fixed ra- dius and 7+4 −3 MJ for a scaled radius. Our best-fit planet radius is ∼ 1.65 ± 0.06 RJ and luminosity of log(L/L⊙) = -3.80 ± 0.02. • 6. -- While our derived luminosity and radius for β Pic b rules out cold start models, the radius is near the upper end of predicted radii for hot start- formed planets with β Pic's age. As the planet only needs to be ∼ 100 K hotter to easily eliminate this discrepancy, it likely identifies a limitation of the atmosphere models. Alternatively, if β Pic b has a significantly younger age than the star's age con- sistent with it forming late in the protoplanetary disk stage our derived radius is comfortably within the range predicted by hot start models. 6.2. Comparisons to Other Recent β Pictoris b Studies 6.2.1. Currie et al. 2011b In our first-look analysis of the atmosphere of β Pic- toris b (Currie et al. 2011b), we compared its Ks, L′, 11 and [4.05] photometry to an array of atmosphere mod- els, from atmospheres completely lacking clouds to those with the Model A-type thick clouds that extend to the visible surface of the atmosphere. In that pa- per, we found that the AE thick cloud models from Madhusudhan et al. (2011) yielded the smallest χ2 value. The fits degraded at about the same level for the Model A thick cloud and Model E "normal" L dwarf atmosphere prescriptions, while the cloudless case fared the worst. Currie et al. (2011b) conclude that while the AE thick cloud model quantitatively produced the best fit, the ex- isting data were too poor to say whether the clouds in β Pictoris b were any different in physical extent, in mean dust particle size, etc. from those for field L dwarfs with the same range of temperatures. Our present study greatly improves upon the analyses in Currie et al. (2011b). First, our photometry covers seven passbands, not three, at 1.25 -- 4.8 µm, not 2.18 -- 4.05 µm. This expanded coverage allows far firmer constraints on β Pic b's atmospheric properties. In particular, our new photometry strongly favors the Model A thick-cloud prescription over AE, largely due to the relatively low planet flux densities at 1.25 -- 1.65 µm and the relatively high flux densities at 3.1 µm and M ′/4.8 µm, trends that the Model A cases consistently reproduce better. While all models considered in Currie et al. (2011b) assumed a modal particle size of 60 µm for dust entrained in clouds, our fits improve if we use smaller sizes. The combined effect of thicker clouds and smaller particle sizes favor atmosphere models with a slightly higher surface gravity and temperature than the best-fit model in Currie et al. (2011b). Our new data more clearly demonstrate the fail- ure of the E models successful in fitting most of the field L dwarf sequence and thus better distinguish β Pic b's atmosphere from that of a typical cloudy field L dwarf. 6.2.2. Bonnefoy et al. (2013) Bonnefoy et al. (2013) presented new photometry for β Pictoris b in the J, H, and M ′ filters from data taken in 2011 and 2012. The J and H detections are firsts and greatly expand the wavelength coverage for β Pic b's SED. Their M ′ detection is first well-calibrated detec- tion, building upon and following the detection presented in Currie et al. (2011b), which lacked a contemporane- ous flux-calibration data to provide precise photometry. They then combined these measurements with their pre- viously published Ks and L′ photometry and [4.05] from Quanz et al. (2010). In general, our study clarifies and modifies, instead of contradicting, the picture of β Pictoris b constructed in Bonnefoy et al. (2013). On the same datasets, the SNR of our detections is slightly higher but our photometry agrees within theirs derived from their CADI, RADI, and LOCI reductions within their adopted photometric un- certainties (∼ 0.2 -- 0.3 mag). We derive smaller photo- metric uncertainties, owing to a more uniform through- put as a function of azimuthal angle, probably due to our pixel masking technique and SVD cutoff in A-LOCI (see also Marois et al. 2010b). We concur that the planet's mid-IR colors are unusually red and highlight a poten- tially strong, new disagreement with field L dwarfs at 3.1 µm. We agree with Bonnefoy et al.'s general result that the best-fitting atmosphere models are those interme- 12 diate between the AMES-DUSTY models (submicron- sized dust everywhere) and the COND or BT-Settl mod- els (no dust/clouds or very thin clouds). Quantitatively, the χ2 values we derive are much larger than the best- fitting models in Bonnefoy et al. because our photomet- ric uncertainties are significantly smaller (e.g. 7 vs. 3 for AMES-DUSTY). Our analyses point to thick clouds and particle sizes small compared to the range typically used in the Burrows et al. (2006) models but larger than the ISM-like grains in the AMES-DUSTY models. The tem- peratures, surface gravities, and luminosities they derive are generally consistent with our best-fit values. While they derive a lower limit to the initial entropy of 9.3 kB/baryon, we do not provide a detailed simi- lar analysis since the inferred entropy range depends on the planet radius which, considering our studies together, is very model dependent. Similarly, it depends on the planet mass (for which there still is some range) and the planet's age (which is very poorly constrained). Still, we agree that cold start models are ruled out for β Pic b as they fail to reproduce the inferred luminosity and radii of the planet determined from both our studies. 6.3. Future Work to Constrain β Pic b's Properties Deriving β Pic b's mass and other properties is diffi- cult since they are based on highly uncertain parameters such as the planet's age and its entropy at formation. However, dynamical mass limits can be derived from continued radial-velocity measurements (Lagrange et al. 2012a). As these limits depend on β Pic b's orbital pa- rameters, future planet astrometry may be particularly important in constraining β Pic b's mass. If β Pic b is responsible for the warp observed in the secondary debris disk (Golimowski et al. 2006), planet-disk inter- action modeling can likewise yield a dynamical mass es- timate (Lagrange et al. 2009a; Dawson et al. 2011) pro- vided the planet's orbit is known. Finally, while our models nominally assume solar abun- dances, we showed that changing the methane abundance might yield marginally better fits to the data. Near- infrared spectroscopic observations of β Pic b as can be done soon with GP I and SP HERE may clarify its at- mospheric chemistry. Future observations with GMT- NIRS on the Giant Magellan Telescope should be capa- ble of resolving molecular lines in β Pic b's atmosphere (Jaffe et al. 2006), providing a more detailed look at its chemistry, perhaps even constraining its carbon to oxy- gen ratio and formation history (e.g Oberg et al. 2011; Konopacky et al. 2013). We thank Christian Thalmann, France Allard, and the anonymous referee for helpful comments and discus- sions and Michael Cushing for providing IRTF/SPeX and Subaru/IRCS spectra of field L dwarfs. We are grate- ful to the telescope staffs at ESO Paranal Observatory and Gemini-South Cerro Pachon Observatory for sup- port for our observations, all of which were obtained with "delegated visitor mode" or "eavesdropping mode". Fi- nally, we thank Christian Marois for very detailed dis- cussions on image processing techniques and extensive helpful suggestions that improved this manuscript. T. C. acknowledges support from a McLean Postdoctoral Fellowship. R. D. acknowledges NSF-GRFP grant DGE- 1144152. Allard, F., et al., 2001, ApJ, 556, 357 Amara, A., Quanz, S., 2012, MNRAS, 427, 948 Baraffe, I., et al., 2003, A&A, 402, 701 Bailey, V., Hinz, P., Currie, T., et al., 2013, ApJ, 767, 31 Bejar, V. J., et al., 2008, ApJ, 673, L185 Beuzit, J.-L., et al., 2008, SPIE, 7014, 41 Biller, B., et al., 2010, ApJ, 720, 82L Bitner, M., et al., 2010, 714, 1542 Boccaletti, A., et al., 2013, A&A, 551, L14 Bonnefoy, M., et al., 2010, A&A, 512, 52 Bonnefoy, M., et al., 2011, A&A, 528, 15L Bonnefoy, M., et al., 2013a, A&A, 555, 107 Bowler, B., et al., 2010, ApJ, 733, 850 Bowler, B., et al., 2011, ApJ, 743, 148 Bromley, B., Kenyon, S. J., 2011, ApJ, 731, 101 Burgasser, A., et al., 2013, ApJ submitted, arXiv:1303.7283 Burrows, A., et al., 1997, ApJ, 491, 856 Burrows, A., et al., 2006, ApJ, 640, 1063 Carson, J., et al., 2013, ApJ, 763, L32 Chauvin, G., et al., 2004, A&A, 425, 29L Chauvin, G., et al., 2005, A&A, 438, L29 Chauvin, G., et al., 2012, A&A, 542, 41 Cohen, M., et al., 1995, AJ, 110, 275 Cohen, M, et al., 2003, AJ, 126, 1090 Currie, T., et al., 2007, 669, L33 Currie, T., Lada, C. J, et al., 2009, ApJ, 698, 1 Currie, T., Bailey, V., et al., 2010, ApJ, 721, L177 Currie, T., Burrows, A., et al., 2011, ApJ, 729, 128 Currie, T., Thalmann, C., et al., 2011, ApJ, 736, L33 Currie, T., Sicilia-Aguilar, A., 2011, ApJ, 732, 24 Currie, T., et al., 2012a, ApJ, 760, L32 Currie, T., et al., 2012b, ApJ, 755, L34 Currie, T., et al., 2012c, ApJ, 757, 28 Cushing, M., et al., 2005, ApJ, 623, 1115 REFERENCES Cushing, M., et al., 2008, ApJ, 678, 1372 Dawson, R., et al., 2011, ApJ, 743, L17 Deirmendjian, D., 1964, Appl. Opt., 3, 87 Delorme, P., et al., 2013, A&A, 553, L5 Fabrycky, D., Murray-Clay, R., 2010, ApJ, 710, 1408 Fedele, D., et al., 2010, A&A, 510, 72 Fortney, J., et al., 2008, ApJ, 683, 1104 Galicher, R., et al., 2011, ApJ, 739, L41 Galicher, R., Marois, C., et al., 2013, in prep. Girard, J, et al., 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8447, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Golimowski, D., et al., 2006, AJ, 131, 3109 Hauschildt, P., Baron, E., 1999, JCAM, 109, 41 Hubeny, I., Burrows, A., 2007, ApJ, 669, 1248 Ireland, M., et al., 2011, ApJ, 726, 113 Jaffe, D., et al., 2006, SPIE, 6269, 166 Kenyon, S., Bromley, B., 2009, ApJ, 690, L140 Konopacky, Q., et al., 2013, Science, 339, 1398 Kratter, K., et al., 2010, ApJ, 710, 1375 Kraus, A., Ireland, M., 2012, ApJ, 745, 1 Lafreni´ere, D., et al., 2007a, ApJ, 670, 1367 Lafreni´ere, D., et al., 2007b, ApJ, 660, 770 Lafreni´ere, D., et al., 2008, ApJ, 689, L153 Lafreni´ere, D., et al., 2010, ApJ, 719, 497 Lagrange, A.-M., et al., 2009, A&A, 493, L21 Lagrange, A.-M., et al., 2010, Science, 329, 57 Lagrange, A.-M., et al., 2012a, A&A, 542, L18 Lagrange, A.-M., et al., 2012b, A&A, 542, L40 Leggett, S., et al., 2010, ApJ, 710, 1627 Lowrance, P., et al., 1999, ApJ, 512, L69 Lowrance, P., et al., 2000, ApJ, 541, 390 Luhman, K. L., et al., 2007, ApJ, 654, 570 13 TABLE 1 Observing Log UT Date Telescope/Instrument Mode Pixel Scale (mas pixel−1) Filter tint Nimages (s) ∆PA (degrees) 2011-12-16 2012-01-11 2012-12-15 2012-12-16 2012-12-16 2012-12-23 2012-12-26 2013-01-09 VLT/NaCo VLT/NaCo Direct Direct 13.22 13.22 VLT/NaCo VLT/NaCo VLT/NaCo Gemini/NICI Gemini/NICI Gemini/NICI Direct Direct Direct Direct Direct 0.′′22 mask 27.1 27.1 27.1 17.97 17.97 17.97/17.94 J H M ′ L′ [4.05] [3.09] [3.09] H/Ks 50 40 20 30 30 38 38 11.4 48 92 176 112 64 60 60 117 26 34.6 70.2 67.7 57.4 30.2 31.7 41.1 β Pictoris b Detections and Photometry TABLE 2 UT Date Telescope/Instrument Filter Wavelength (µm) SNR Apparent Magnitude Absolute Magnitude 2011-12-16 VLT/NaCo 2012-01-01 VLT/NaCo 2013-01-09 Gemini/NICI 2013-01-09 Gemini/NICI 2012-12-23 Gemini/NICI 2012-12-26 Gemini/NICI 2012-12-16 VLT/NaCo 2012-12-16 VLT/NaCo 2012-12-15 VLT/NaCo J H H Ks [3.09] [3.09] L′ [4.05] M′ 1.25 1.65 1.65 2.16 3.09 3.09 3.8 4.05 4.78 9.2 30 6.4 10 4.6 11 40 20 22 14.11 ± 0.21 13.32 ± 0.14 13.25 ± 0.18 12.47 ± 0.13 11.71 ± 0.27 -- 11.24 ± 0.08 11.04 ± 0.08 10.96 ± 0.13 12.68 ± 0.21 11.89 ± 0.14 11.82 ± 0.18 11.04 ± 0.13 10.28 ± 0.27 -- 9.81 ± 0.08 9.61 ± 0.08 9.54 ± 0.13 Sample Photometric NaCo and NICI Error Budgets TABLE 3 Telescope/Instrument Filter Apparent Magnitude Gemini/NICI Gemini/NICI VLT/NaCo VLT/NaCo Ks [3.09] L′ M ′ 12.47 ± 0.13 11.71 ± 0.27 11.24 ± 0.08 10.96 ± 0.13 σdet 0.11 0.24 0.03 0.05 σatten σf luxcal 0.06 0.11 0.07 0.11 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.06 Note. -- The photometric uncertainty from the intrinsic SNR (σdet) scales as 1.0857/SNR. Luhman, K. L., 2013, ApJ, 767, L1 Macintosh, B., et al., 2008, SPIE, 7015, 31 Madhusudhan, N., Burrows, A., Currie, T., 2011, ApJ, 737, 34 Marois, C., et al., 2006, ApJ, 641, 556 Marois, C., et al., 2008, Science, 322, 1348 Marois, C., et al., 2010a, Nature, 468, 1080 Marois, C., et al., 2010b, SPIE, 7736, 52 Martinache, F., Guyon, O., 2009, SPIE, 7440, 20 Oberg, K., et al., 2011, ApJ, 743, L16 Pascucci, I., et al., 2006, ApJ, 651, 1177 Pecaut, M., et al., 2012, ApJ, 746, 154 Quanz, S., et al., 2010, ApJ, 722, L49 Rafikov, R., 2011, ApJ, 727, 86 Rameau, J., et al., 2013, A&A, 553, 60 Rayner, J., et al., 2009, ApJS, 185, 289 Rieke, G. H., et al., 2008, AJ, 135, 2245 Rodigas, T. J., et al., 2012, ApJ, 752, 57 Rousset, G., et al., 2003, SPIE 4839, 140 Skemer, A., et al., 2011, ApJ, 732, 107 Skemer, A., et al., 2012, ApJ, 753, 14 Soummer, R., Pueyo, L., Larkin, J., 2012, ApJ, 755, L28 Spiegel, D., Burrows, A., 2012, ApJ, 745, 174 Sudol, J., Haghighighpour, N., 2012, ApJ, 755, 38 Thalmann, C., et al., 2009, ApJ, 707, L123 Tokunaga, A., Vacca, W. D., 2005, PASP, 117, 421 Vigan, A., et al., 2012, A&A, 544, 9 Wahhaj, Z., et al., 2011, ApJ, 729, 139 Whitney, B., et al., 2003, ApJ, 598, 1079 Zuckerman, B., et al., 2001, ApJ, 562, L87 14 Young Directly Imaged Planets and Very Low-Mass Brown Dwarfs Used for Comparison TABLE 4 Companion D (pc) Assoc. Age ST(Primary) ST(Companion) Sep. Mass References Planets/Planet Candidates HR 8799 b HR 8799 c HR 8799 d HR 8799 e κ And b 39.4 ± 1 39.4 ± 1 39.4 ± 1 39.4 ± 1 51.6 ± 0.5 Columba Columba Columba Columba Columba 30 30 30 30 30 A5 A5 A5 A5 B9IV Low Mass Brown Dwarfs 1RXJ 1609 B GSC 06214 B USco CTIO 108 B HIP 78530 B 2M 1207 B 2M 1207 A TWA 5B HR 7329 B PZ Tel B 2M0103AB B AB Pic B Luhman 16 B Luhman 16 A CD-35 2722 B US 145 ± 14 US 145 ± 14 145 ± 14 US 156.7 ± 13.0 US 52.4 ± 1.1 52.5 ± 1.1 44.4 ± 4 47.7 ± 1.5 51.5 ± 2.6 47.2 ± 3.1 45.5 ± 1.8 2.02 ± 0.15 2.02 ± 0.15 21.3 ± 1.4 TWA TWA TWA β Pic β Pic Tuc-Hor? Carina Argus? Argus? AB Dor K7 5 -- 10 5 -- 10 K7 5 -- 10 M7 5 -- 10 ∼8 ∼8 ∼ 8 12 12 30 30 40? 40? ∼ 100 M1Ve B9V M8 M8 M2Ve A0 K0 M5/M6 K1Ve L7.5 L7.5 ?? L/T? L/T? L/T? L2 -- L8? L4 ± 2 L0 ± 1 M9.5 M8 ± 1 ?? M8 M8 -- M8.5 M7.5 M7 ± 2 L? L0±1 T0.5 L7.5 L4±1 67.5 -- 70.8 42.1 -- 44.4 26.4 -- 28.1 ∼15 55± 2 4 -- 5 ∼ 7 ∼ 7 ∼ 7 11.8-14.8 1,2,3,4,5 1,2,3,4,5 1,2,3,4,5 2,4,6 7 330 320 ± 30 670 ± 64 710 ± 60 40.8 ± 9 40.8 ± 9 ∼ 98 200 ± 7 17.9 ± 0.9 84 248± 10 3.12 ± 0.25 3.12 ± 0.25 67.4±4 6 -- 12 14 ± 2 6-16 22 ± 4 8± 2 24± 6 ∼ 20 26 ± 4 36 ± 6 12 -- 14 13 -- 14 40 -- 65 40 -- 65 31±8 8,9 10,11 12 11,13 14 14 15 16 17 18 19, 20 21,22 21,22 23 Note. -- References: 1) Marois et al. (2008), 2) Currie et al. (2011a), 3) Galicher et al. (2011), 4) Skemer et al. (2012), 5) Currie et al. (2012b), 6) Marois et al. (2010a), 7) Carson et al. (2013), 8) Lafreni´ere et al. (2008), 9) Lafreni`ere et al. (2010), 10) Ireland et al. (2011), 11) Bailey et al. (2013), 12) Bejar et al. (2008), 13) Lafreni`ere et al. (2010), 14) Chauvin et al. (2004), 15) Lowrance et al. (1999), 16) Lowrance et al. (2000), 17) Biller et al. (2010), 18) Delorme et al. (2013), 19) Chauvin et al. (2005), 20) Bonnefoy et al. (2010), 21) Luhman et al. (2013), 22) Burgasser et al. (2013), 23) Wahhaj et al. (2011) Photometry for Young Directly Imaged Planets and Very Low-Mass Brown Dwarfs TABLE 5 Companion J H Ks [3.09] L′ M ′ Planets/Candidates HR 8799 b HR 8799 c HR 8799 d HR 8799 e κ And b Low-Mass Brown Dwarfs 1RXJ 1609 B GSC 06214 B USco CTIO 108 B HIP 78530 B 2M 1207 B 2M 1207 A TWA 5B HR 7329 B PZ Tel B 2M0103AB B AB Pic B Luhman 16 B Luhman 16 A CD-35 2722 B 16.52±0.14 14.65±0.17 15.26±0.43 -- 12.7 ± 0.30 15.08 ± 0.17 14.18 ± 0.17 14.23 ± 0.22 13.88 ± 0.20 11.7 ± 0.20 14.05 ± 0.08 13.13 ± 0.08 13.11 ± 0.08 12.89 ± 0.26 11.0 ± 0.4 -- -- -- -- -- 12.68 ± 0.12 11.83 ± 0.07 11.50 ± 0.12 11.61 ± 0.12 > 10.09 9.54 ± 0.09 13.07 ± 0.30 12.05 ± 0.14 11.67 ± 0.35 -- 12.09 ± 0.12 10.43 ± 0.04 10.72 ± 0.09 9.25 ± 0.05 16.40 ± 0.2 9.35 ± 0.03 9.1 ± 0.2 8.64 ± 0.19 8.70± 0.18 12.1 ± 0.3 12.80 ± 0.10 14.69 ± 0.04 15.00 ± 0.04 11.99 ± 0.18 11.06 ± 0.07 9.74 ± 0.04 9.94 ± 0.08 8.58 ± 0.04 14.49 ± 0.21 8.74 ± 0.03 8.65 ± 0.06 8.33 ± 0.1 8.31 ± 0.15 10.9 ± 0.2 11.31 ± 0.10 13.86 ± 0.04 13.84 ± 0.04 11.14 ± 0.19 10.38 ± 0.05 9.14 ± 0.05 9.30 ± 0.11 8.36 ± 0.04 13.31 ± 0.11 8.30 ± 0.03 7.91 ± 0.2 8.18 ± 0.1 7.86 ± 0.19 10.3 ± 0.2 10.76 ± 0.08 13.20 ± 0.09 12.91 ± 0.04 10.37 ± 0.16 9.84 ± 0.21 8.60 ± 0.08 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8.99 ± 0.30 7.94 ± 0.07 -- 7.99 ± 0.06 11.68 ± 0.14 7.73 ± 0.10 -- 7.69 ± 0.1 -- 9.3 ± 0.1 9.9 ± 0.1 -- -- -- -- 7.94 ± 0.30 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- χ2 βP icb C.L. 52.8 6.098 8.351 -- 0.946 ∼ 1 0.893 0.961 -- 0.186 0.287 0.864 -- 1.369 7.001 -- 88.086 ∼ 1 20.601 ∼ 1 48.044 ∼ 1 -- 0.736 0.996 59.455 ∼ 1 -- 2.666 11.231 -- -- -- Note. -- We only quantitatively compare the photometry between β Pic b and those objects with full JHKsL′ photometry. 15 TABLE 6 Adopted Flux Density Zero-Points Filter λo (µm) Fν,o (Jy) J H Ks [3.09] L′ [4.05] M′ 1.25 1.65 2.15 3.09 3.78 4.05 4.78 1594 1024 666.20 356 248 207 154 β Pictoris b Atmosphere Modeling Grid TABLE 7 Model Tef f Limiting Cases E60 1000-1800 AE60 1000-1700 A60 1000-1700 AMES-DUSTY 1000-2000 Range log(g) 4 -- 4.5 4 -- 4.5 4 -- 4.5 3.5 -- 4.5 0.9 -- 2 0.9 -- 2 0.9 -- 2 0.9 -- 2 New Models A4 1400-1900 3.6 -- 4.25 0.9 -- 2a References Rp (RJ ) 1 2 1,3 4 5 Note. -- a) In our modeling, we perform two runs for the A4 models: one where we fix the radius to values adopted in the Burrows et al. (1997) hot-start models and one where we allow the radius to freely vary between 0.9 RJ and 2 RJ . References: 1) Burrows et al. (2006), 2) Madhusudhan et al. (2011), 3) Currie et al. (2011a), 4) Allard et al. (2001), and 5) this work. TABLE 8 Model Fitting Results Model E60 AE60 A60 AMES-DUSTY χ2 min 53.80 37.70 19.99 7.14 log(g), Tef f , R(RJ ) (for χ2 min) log(g), Tef f , R(RJ ) (68%) log(g), Tef f , R(RJ ) (95%) 4.0, 1400 K, 1.79 4.5, 1400 K, 1.96 4.5, 1400 K, 2.05 3.5, 1700 K, 1.35 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.5 -- 4, 1700 K, 1.32 -- 1.35 A4 (fixed radius) 5.85 3.8, 1600 K, 1.65 3.8, 1600 K, 1.65 3.6, 1500 -- 1550 K, 1.79 -- 1.80 3.8, 1550 -- 1625 K, 1.65 4.0, 1650 -- 1700 K, 1.54 A4 (scale) A4 (1% CH4, scale) . 5.82 5.13 4 -- 4.25, 1600 K, 1.65 3.6 -- 4.25, 1600 K, 1.64 -- 1.66 3.6 -- 4.25, 1500 -- 1750 K, 1.44 -- 1.82 4, 1575 K, 1.71 4, 1575 -- 1650 K, 1.59 -- 1.71 4, 1575 -- 1650 K, 1.59 -- 1.71 Note. -- The χ2 values quoted here do not refer to χ2 per degree of freedom. The columns for A4 (fixed radius) do not have a range in radius in some columns because only one model (with a fixed radius) identifies the χ2 minimum 16 Fig. 1. -- Processed Gemini-NICI images obtained at H band (top-left), Ks band (top-right), and the H20 filter centered on ∼ 3.1 µm (bottom panels: 23 Dec 2012 data on bottom-left, 26 Dec 2012 data on the bottom right). For clarity, we mask the region interior to ∼ 0.′′4 and convolve the image with a gaussian equal to the image FWHM. The planet β Pic b is in the lower-right at a position angle of ∼ 210o and a separation of ∼ 0.′′46. The color scale is set such that over the planet's FWHM the pixel color is white. Fig. 2. -- Processed VLT/NaCo J (left) and H (right) band images presented in the same manner as Figure 1. Owing to very good speckle suppression, the H-band data's effective inner working angle beyond which we are sensitive to β Pic b-brightness companions is significantly smaller than for the J band data and the preceding NICI images (rIW A = 0.′′2). 17 Fig. 3. -- Processed VLT/NaCo L′ (left), [4.05] (middle), and M ′ (right) images presented as in Figures 1 and 2. 18 Fig. 4. -- Classical ADI reduction of our L′ data showing a clear detection of the β Pic debris disk. The green dot denotes the position of β Pic b in the disk. β Pic b Planets/Low-Mass Brown Dwarfs 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 H - J -0.5 -0.5 0.0 0.5 H-Ks L - s K 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 19 L - s K 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 M Dwarfs L0-L4 Dwarfs L5-L9 Dwarfs T Dwarfs 1.0 1.5 -1 0 1 J-Ks 2 3 K - J 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 H-Ks 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 K-M 2.0 2.5 Fig. 5. -- Near-to-mid infrared color-color diagrams comparing β Pic b's colors (blue diamonds) to those of M dwarfs (small dark circles), early L-type brown dwarfs (grey circles), late L dwarfs (asterisks), and T dwarfs (light grey dots) from Leggett et al. (2010). We also overplot the positions of young, substellar objects/other directly-imaged planets (turquoise squares). 20 8 10 12 14 16 18 J M 8 10 12 14 16 H M -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 J-H 1.0 1.5 2.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 H-Ks 1.0 1.5 8 10 12 14 16 H M 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 K M 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 H-L 1.5 K-M 2.0 2.5 Fig. 6. -- Color-magnitude diagrams comparing β Pic b to field M, L, and T dwarfs and young, substellar objects. Symbols are the same as in Figure 5. Fig. 7. -- Photometric data for β Pic b compared to L dwarf standard spectra between L2 and L8 as well as a low surface gravity L4 dwarf from Cushing et al. (2005, 2008). We scale β Pic b's flux density at Ks band to the band-integrated flux density of the standards at 2.15 µm. With the possible exception of the low surface gravity L4 dwarf, none of these standards provide a good match to measurments for β Pic b. We identify the passbands along the bottom of the plot (left-hand panel). 21 Fig. 8. -- Comparisons between the β Pic b SED and the closest-matching substellar objects with J HKsL′ photometry. Quantitatively, 1RXJ 1609 B and κ And b provide the closest matches, although it is as-yet unclear whether any known substellar object fully reproduces β Pic b's SED at all measured wavelengths. 22 Fig. 9. -- The χ2 distributions (top-left) and best-fitting models (top-right, middle panels) for our limiting cases: the E60, thin cloud/large dust models the AE60, moderately-thick cloud/large dust models (second row), and the A60, thick cloud/large dust models. (Bottom panels) The χ2 distributions and best-fit AMES-DUSTY models which assume ISM-sized dust grains. The horizontal lines in the lefthand panels display the 68% and 95% confidence limits. The pink bars roughly denote the model-predicted flux densities at the filters' central wavelength positions. We identify the passbands along the bottom of the plot (top-right panel). 23 Fig. 10. -- The effect of atmospheric dust particle sizes on the shape of a massive planet SED. Here, the < a > = 50, 30, and 5 µm models depict log(g) = 4, Tef f = 1600 K models while the < a > = 3 µm model assumes log(g) = 3.8 and is scaled to match the luminosity of the < a > = 5 µm model. For small particle sizes, surface gravity signatures are weak and this parameter's effect is primarily to change the flux scaling. Fig. 11. -- The χ2 distribution (left) and best-fitting model (right) for the thick cloud, small dust A4 models, showing that we can achieve statistically significant fits to the data provided that the clouds are thick and the atmospheric dust particles are significantly smaller than those we have previously assumed in matching L dwarf spectra (c.f. Burrows et al. 2006). This model fitting ties the planet radius to predictions for hot-start models from Burrows et al. (1997). The horizontal dashed lines identify the 95% confidence limit (top) and 68% confidence limit (bottom). Fig. 12. -- Same as Figure 11 except treating the planet radius as a free parameter. Here we show the log(g) = 4, Tef f = 1600 K, though the synthetic spectrum's appearance and its agreement with the data at neighboring gridpoints in surface gravity is nearly identical. 24 Fig. 13. -- SED fits adopting the nominally good-fitting atmosphere parameters depicted in Figure 12 but enhancing the atmosphere of methane. Fig. 14. -- (left) Luminosity evolution for hot-start models from Baraffe et al. (2003), comparing β Pic b's luminosity as derived in this work to that for the directly-imaged planets HR 8799 bcde, the planet/low-mass brown dwarf κ And b, and other very low-mass brown dwarf companions. The solid circle denotes β Pic b's nominal positions, whereas the open circle identifies its effective position on this plot if it formed after 5 Myr. (Right) Evolution of the radius for planets with masses of 1 -- 10 MJ for the "hot-start" and "cold-start" planet cooling models from Spiegel and Burrows (2012). The radius error bars define the range of planet radii from models consistent with the data to within the 68% confidence limit.
1603.08930	1	1603	2016-03-29T20:00:05	Probing Planet Forming Zones with Rare CO Isotopologues	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The gas near the midplanes of planet-forming protostellar disks remains largely unprobed by observations due to the high optical depth of commonly observed molecules such as CO and H$_2$O. However, rotational emission lines from rare molecules may have optical depths near unity in the vertical direction, so that the lines are strong enough to be detected, yet remain transparent enough to trace the disk midplane. Here we present a chemical model of an evolving T-Tauri disk and predict the optical depths of rotational transitions of $^{12}$C$^{16}$O, $^{13}$C$^{16}$O, $^{12}$C$^{17}$O and $^{12}$C$^{18}$O. The MRI-active disk is primarily heated by the central star due to the formation of the dead zone. CO does not freeze out in our modeled region within $70$AU around a sunlike star. However, the abundance of CO decreases because of the formation of complex organic molecules (COM), producing an effect that can be misinterpreted as the "snow line". These results are robust to variations in our assumptions about the evolution of the gas to dust ratio. The optical depths of low-order rotational lines of C$^{17}$O are around unity, making it possible to see into the disk midplane using C$^{17}$O. Combining observations with modeled C$^{17}$O$/$H$_2$ ratios, like those we provide, can yield estimates of protoplanetary disks' gas masses.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version June 11, 2021 Preprint typeset using LATEX style AASTeX6 v. 1.0 6 1 0 2 r a M 9 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 0 3 9 8 0 . 3 0 6 1 : v i X r a PROBING PLANET FORMING ZONES WITH RARE CO ISOTOPOLOGUES Mo Yu 1, Karen Willacy 2, Sarah E. Dodson-Robinson 3, Neal J. Turner 2, and Neal J. Evans II 1 1Astronomy Department, University of Texas, 1 University Station C1400, Austin, TX 78712, USA 2Mail Stop 169-506, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109 3University of Delaware, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 217 Sharp Lab, Newark, DE 19716 ABSTRACT The gas near the midplanes of planet-forming protostellar disks remains largely unprobed by observa- tions due to the high optical depth of commonly observed molecules such as CO and H2O. However, rotational emission lines from rare molecules may have optical depths near unity in the vertical di- rection, so that the lines are strong enough to be detected, yet remain transparent enough to trace the disk midplane. Here we present a chemical model of an evolving T-Tauri disk and predict the optical depths of rotational transitions of 12C16O, 13C16O, 12C17O and 12C18O. The MRI-active disk is primarily heated by the central star due to the formation of the dead zone. CO does not freeze out in our modeled region within 70 AU around a sunlike star. However, the abundance of CO de- creases because of the formation of complex organic molecules (COM), producing an effect that can be misinterpreted as the "snow line". These results are robust to variations in our assumptions about the evolution of the gas to dust ratio. The optical depths of low-order rotational lines of C17O are around unity, making it possible to see into the disk midplane using C17O. Combining observations with modeled C17O/H2 ratios, like those we provide, can yield estimates of protoplanetary disks' gas masses. Keywords: astrochemistry -- planets and satellites: formation -- protoplanetary disks -- ISM: molecules 1. INTRODUCTION The mass and surface density of the inner 30 AU of protoplanetary disks are critical parameters that control disk evolution and planet formation. Disk masses are currently determined by (sub)millimeter observations of dust, because the optical depth of continuum emission is low at radii much larger than 10 AU (Williams & Cieza 2011). However, observations begin to lose sensitivity to grains as they grow beyond the observing wavelength; millimeter wave observations may thus underestimate solid masses in the inner disk, where dust settling and higher densities lead to more rapid growth (P´erez et al. 2012). On the other hand, commonly observed molecular lines often suffer from high optical depth, and are there- fore unable to probe gas near the midplane. Molecules that are important mass contributors to outer Solar Sys- tem objects, such as H2O and NH3, freeze out very close to the central star from the perspective of observers > 100 pc away. Thus, gas phase lines are hard to ob- serve and most do not probe the giant planet-forming region. Here we seek a molecule that can be used to probe the conditions in planet-forming midplanes with rotational transitions observable from the ground. It must be present in the gas phase, even in a cold disk, and be optically thin enough that the disk is transpar- ent in its rotational line emission. CO is volatile enough not to freeze out within a few tens of AU of the central star, so is able to probe a large disk area. Ali-Dib et al. (2014b) even find that, like H2O, CO may be an im- portant planet-building molecule for ice giants. While rotational emission from 12C16O is optically thick due to the molecule's high abundance, rare isotopologues of CO may provide optically thin lines due to their low abun- dances (Miotello et al. 2014). If so, CO isotopologue observations could lay the foundation for empirically de- termining the mass available for gas giant formation in nearby disks. A clue that overall disk masses may be much larger than the MMSN (minimum-mass solar nebula) came from Bergin et al. (2013), who measured the mass of TW Hya using the optically thin J = 1 → 0 transition of HD with the Herschel Space Observatory. The 10 Myr-old transitional disk is estimated to have a mass of 0.05 M(cid:12), much heavier than the 0.01M(cid:12) of the MMSN, and larger than many measurements estimated from dust emission. This study has demonstrated the importance of measur- ing gas mass directly. However, the HD J = 1 state has a high excitation energy of E/kb = 128.5 K (kb is the Boltzmann constant), so the line intensity depends on not only the mass available but also the temperature of the gas. Moreover, this transition is not accessible from the ground. Since there is no far-infrared space mission available, this method cannot be generally applied in the near future. Extrapolating from line intensities to total disk mass requires knowledge of both the abundances and the iso- topic ratios in the molecules being observed. Abun- dances are not constant throughout the disk, as freeze- out rate, UV intensity, and X-ray intensity all change with distance from the star. Some chemical reactions are isotope-selective, so the isotope ratio in molecules is also a function of distance from the star. Miotello et al. (2014) have shown that the abundance ratio of rare isotopologues of CO to 12C16O (If not specified, CO means the most common isotopologue of CO - 12C16O - hereafter) can deviate from the atomic ratio significantly due to isotope-selective photodissociation; the extent of the effect depends on the strength of UV radiation and dust properties. Finally, disk temperature and density change over time, bringing changes in the molecular in- ventory as the disk evolves. Here we present chemical evolution models of protostellar disks to build a frame- work for translating observed fluxes into mass densities available for planet formation. The disk model consists of three main components -- the thermodynamic model, the chemical model, and the optical depth estimation. The workflow of the disk model is sketched in Fig. 1, and the structure of this paper follows the model workflow. The thermodynamic model (Section 2) calculates the evolution of the disk thermal structure for 3 Myr by adding the passive heat- ing from the stellar irradiation to the viscous heating from the magnetorotational instability (MRI) turbu- lence (Balbus & Hawley 1991). We construct 2D dust radiative transfer models with RADMC (Dullemond & Dominik 2004) to calculate the passive heating, and adopt the viscous heating profile from an MRI-active disk model (Landry et al. 2013), which includes a vis- cosity prescription for accretion driven by MRI turbu- lence. The chemical model (Section 3) then uses the den- sity and temperature profiles from the thermodynamic model as input to calculate the disk's chemical evolu- tion for 3 Myr. After analyzing chemical model results and discussing the model dependencies on initial molec- ular cloud abundances, uncertainties in reaction rates, and different grain evolution scenarios in section 4, we estimate optical depths of various rotational emission lines from CO isotopologues (Section 5), and calculate the optical depths contributed by dust at correspond- ing locations. Finally, we summarize the main results in section 6. A list of symbols and definitions used can be found in Table 1. 2. THE THERMODYNAMIC MODEL The thermodynamic model provides density and tem- perature evolution profiles for both the chemical model and the optical depth calculation. Our thermodynamic model is built upon the 1 + 1D disk model by Landry et al. (2013), who calculated the structure and evolu- tion of a disk with 0.015 M(cid:12) within 70 AU of the star. The central star follows the evolutionary track of a 0.95 M(cid:12) star (D'Antona & Mazzitelli 1994) from 0.1 Myr (T(cid:63) = 4600K, and R(cid:63) = 5.5 R(cid:12)), roughly the begin- ning of the T-Tauri phase (Dunham & Vorobyov 2012), to 3 Myr (T(cid:63) = 4500K, and R(cid:63) = 1.5 R(cid:12)). Landry et al. (2013) followed the viscous evolution of the inner 70 AU of the disk. Because our goal is to probe the giant planet-forming regions, we focus our study on the inner 70 AU of the disk. The disk is heated passively by stellar irradiation, and actively by viscous heating due to accretion. In order to determine the degree of viscous heating, Landry et al. (2013) evaluated whether MRI is present or not in each individual grid cell by considering both Ohmic resistivi- ties and ambipolar diffusion. The MRI is shut down by Ohmic resistivity on the midplane, forming a deadzone extending to about 16 AU. The disk has an MRI ac- tive layer near the surface, which provides an accretion rate of 10−9 M(cid:12)yr−1 even when a dead zone is present. However, unlike models with assumed uniform turbulent efficiency [with a constant α parameter, where viscosity ν = αcsH, cs is the sound speed, and H is the scale height; Shakura & Sunyaev (1973)], heating contributed by MRI (extracted from the energy of shear flow) only contributes slightly to the total heat budget of the disk because the power is deposited in the disk atmosphere at low optical depths. Landry et al. (2013) calculated the heating from stel- lar irradiation in a 1 + 1D geometry using Rosseland mean opacities. Following Chiang & Goldreich (1997), Landry et al. (2013) considered stellar radiation enter- ing the disk at a grazing angle, heating up the disk sur- face. Reprocessed stellar flux then traveled vertically from the disk surface to the midplane. However, long- wavelength radiation emitted by dust grains at the disk surface should travel unimpeded to the midplane, caus- ing heating that is not captured by using Rosseland mean opacities. By assuming that heating propagates only vertically from the heated surface, one also neglects the heat transfer in the radial direction within the disk, which can be important when the wavelength of the re- emitted light is long enough to allow radial propagation. One therefore underestimates the disk temperature by using a 1 + 1D geometry and Rosseland mean opacities. The stellar irradiation cannot heat the disk enough 2 to ionize the disk interior, so the 1 + 1D approximation with Rosseland mean opacity in Landry et al. (2013) was useful to calculate ionization, making the disk evo- lution model tractable. However, the missing heating can be crucial for the disk chemistry. We improved the treatment of the stellar irradiation by including 2D dust radiative transfer models built with the publicly avail- able code RADMC (Dullemond & Dominik 2004). We then calculated the total temperature by taking a flux- weighted sum of the accretion temperature (Tacc) cal- culated from the MRI model and the equilibrium tem- perature (Teq) from stellar irradiation calculated from the 2D dust radiative transfer model at every point of the disk (as demonstrated in the upper half of Fig. 1.): T 4 = T 4 eq + T 4 acc, (1) The 2D dust radiative transfer models are set up with gas density profiles calculated by Landry et al. (2013) and a constant gas/solid ratio throughout the disk. The main focus of Landry et al. (2013) was to study the mass transport. The disk is truncated at about two scale heights above the midplane. The model thus includes the majority of the disk mass, but the dust above the original disk surface in Landry et al. (2013) could affect disk thermal properties by absorbing the stellar radia- tion. We therefore extrapolate the density profile verti- cally with Gaussian distributions down to a background density of 10−26 g cm−3 as input for the radiative trans- fer calculation. Landry et al. (2013) found that if the mean grain size is as small as 0.1µm, the MRI shuts down completely. If the MRI drives accretion in the T-Tauri phase, some grain growth must have occurred, consistent with the findings of Oliveira et al. (2010). (See Gressel et al. (2015) for updated models suggesting that accretion is driven by winds, not MRI.) Evidence for rapid growth of solids in disks has been accumulating in the follow- ing ways: direct evidence from long-wavelength observa- tions Isella et al. (2010), Guilloteau et al. (2011), Ban- zatti et al. (2011), P´erez et al. (2012), P´erez et al. (2015), and Tazzari et al. (2015); observations of forming plan- ets in the LkHa 15 disk by Kraus & Ireland (2012); and the HL Tau images from the ALMA Partnership et al. (2015), which show gaps possibly sculpted by forming planets or resonances with planets. The wavelength-dependent dust opacities that we use are taken from the website1, which provides models whose Rosseland and Planck mean opacities are de- scribed by Semenov et al. (2003), who updated earlier 1 http://www.mpia.de/homes/henning/Dust opacities/Opaciti- es/opacities.html 3 models by Henning & Stognienko (1996) for dust in pro- toplanetary disks. The available dust models include those with different assumptions about the iron mix- ture in the silicates, different models of grain growth, and different grain topologies. The dust grains are ag- gregated from "sub-grains", which themselves follow an MRN distribution extended up to 5 µm (Mathis et al. 1977; Pollack et al. 1985). The dust model that we use assumes a "normal" mix of iron [Fe/(Fe+Mg) = 0.3] and that grain growth has occurred through particle clus- ter aggregation (PCA in the nomenclature of Semenov), which leads to roughly spherical grains. We use the mul- tishell spheres topology and take the models for temper- atures up to 155 K, in which ices and volatile organics are retained. Figure 2 shows the opacity per gram of gas versus wavelength for the adopted dust properties. There are a number of resonances and a relatively slowly declining opacity out to a wavelength of about 1.5 mm, beyond which the opacity declines rapidly. The opacities are given per gram of gas. In our standard model, the dust has already grown and aggregated at the start of disk evolution - 0.1 Myr after the formation of the central star. We further as- sume that 90% of the dust has grown to still larger sizes (pebbles, rocks, etc.), which we no longer describe as dust. This further growth decreases the grain surface area for chemical reactions and makes these solids es- sentially invisible even to millimeter wavelength obser- vations (Birnstiel et al. 2011; Garaud et al. 2013). Con- sequently, we take a gas to dust ratio of 1000, so we divide the opacities from Semenov et al. (2003) by 10. In this model, there is a constant replenishment of dust by collisions between larger objects and the size distri- bution of dust does not evolve. We consider a different model for grain evolution as a variation of our standard assumptions in §4.5.3. The temperature color coded plots (at the beginning and end of the evolution) with Teq computed from the 2D dust radiative transfer model are shown in the up- per panels of Fig. 3. In both cases, the temperature is the highest on the disk surface due to the heating from the central star, and gradually decreases at larger radius and into the disk interior. The temperature almost ev- erywhere in the disk decreases due to the star evolving down the Hayashi track (L(cid:63) decreases from 12.1 L(cid:12) to 0.8 L(cid:12)) and the flattening of the disk itself (cf. the top two panels in Fig. 3). The accretion heating (Tacc) con- tributed by the MRI turbulence is shown in the lower left panel of Fig. 3. Accretion heating contributes less then 3 K in the majority of the disk, rising to about 4 K within 2 AU from the central star. We compare the midplane temperature with Teq com- puted from the 1 + 1D model after 3Myr years of evolu- tion in Landry et al. (2013) and the one computed from the 2D dust radiative transfer model in the lower right panel of Fig. 3. The temperature is much higher in the 2D model in the inner 20 AU. The 1 + 1D model misses heating in the inner part of the disk where the optical depth is larger, and therefore produces artificially lower temperature on the midplane closer to the central star. For example, the Rosseland mean optical depth is ∼ 12 at 5 AU, but ∼ 4 at 15 AU, so 5 AU is more severely affected -- even though its surface temperature is higher. Moreover, once the temperature is down to ∼ 50 K, the black-body radiation re-emitted from dust peaks at far- infrared wavelengths. The mean free path is a significant fraction of the scale height and the assumptions used to justify using Rosseland mean opacity breaks down. Our treatment of temperature is not ideal in the sense that the vertical density structure and the temperature structure are not calculated consistently. However, as an experiment we artificially increased the scale height everywhere in the disk by 20 percent and did not find significant changes to the midplane temperature. We also assume the gas and dust are well mixed and have the same temperature in this paper, which is a valid as- sumption except for the very surface of the disk. Since the purpose of this project is to find an optical depth in the vertical direction and we mainly focus on the disk midplane where most of the disk mass resides, the com- bined accretion and passive heating models, assuming the same temperature for the gas and dust, meet our needs. In the next sections, we describe our standard model and results. Then we describe two variations in the chemistry and one variation in the model of dust evolu- tion. 3. CHEMICAL MODEL The disk temperature and density evolution described in Section 2 allow us to compute the chemical evolution of the disk. We also need initial chemical abundances, which we obtain from a simplified model of the molecular cloud. We construct chemical evolution models including C, H, O, N, and different C and O isotopes based on the UMIST database RATE06 (Woodall et al. 2007), and follow the chemistry of 588 species, 414 gas-phase and 174 ices. The reaction network contains 13116 reactions, including gas-phase reactions, grain-surface reactions, freezeout, thermal desorption, and reactions triggered by UV, X-rays and cosmic rays, such as isotope-selective photodissociation. The carbon isotopic chemistry net- work was developed by Woods & Willacy (2009) and was extended to include oxygen isotopes for this work. We calculate the chemical evolution at each grid point independently. By doing this, we assume that the radial and vertical motions of gas and dust are slow compared 4 to chemical reaction timescales, and that mixing is not important in determining the chemistry. This is a valid assumption for gas-grain reactions or grain surface re- actions due to their short reaction timescale, but might not work as well for gas-phase reactions. However, given that turbulence in the inner 15 AU is restricted to the disk surface, we do not expect vertical mixing to con- tribute much to disk chemistry. In order to calculate the chemical evolution over a 3 Myr lifetime, we use an extension of the computa- tionally efficient rate-equation method to compute re- action rates for grain-surface reactions under the "mean field" approximation (as used by Dodson-Robinson et al. 2009). Rate equations neglect the stochastic variation of abundances on different grains and are not appropri- ate when the number of reacting particles per grain is less than one. We modify our reaction rates following the method of Garrod & Pauly (2011), which consid- ers the competition between thermal hopping of mobile species and reactions on the grain surfaces. We assume that only atoms and simple hydrides are mobile on the grains. Our treatment of gas phase reactions, freezeout, and thermal desorption is similar to that of Dodson- Robinson et al. (2009). After describing the molecular cloud preprocessing model in section 3.1, we focus the rest of this section on the treatment of photochemical and cosmic-ray reactions, which are new to this work. 3.1. Preprocessing in the molecular cloud We model the chemical evolution in the molecular cloud stage to derive input abundances for the proto- planetary disk models. The input abundances are listed in Table 2 (Graedel et al. 1982). Throughout this paper, abundances are presented as the number density normalized to the num- ber density of hydrogen nuclei, nx/(nH + 2nH2 ). The molecular cloud model is run for 1 Myr with a density of 2 × 104 cm−3, at a temperature of 10K and with a visual extinction of 10 magnitudes. The abundances at the end of the molecular cloud phase are given in Table 4. The 12C/13C is ∼ 46 in CO gas, ∼ 63 in CO ice and ∼ 58 in CO2 ice at the end of the molecular cloud model -- all lower than the initial elemental 12C/13C ratio. The reduction is caused by the preferential formation of heavier isotopomers of CO arising from the small energy different in the ion exchange reaction. 13C+ + CO ↔13 CO + C+ + 35K. (2) 13CO has a lower ground-state vibrational energy due to its slightly larger mass compared to CO, and is there- fore more energetically favorable. At 10 K Equation 2 dominates the carbon fractionation, leading to lower 12CO/13CO than the elemental 12C/13C ratio (see also Visser et al. 2009, Langer & Penzias 1993). In other molecules, such as CH4 ice, the opposite effect is seen, with enhanced abundances of condensed 12C leading to higher 12CH4/13CH4 ratios in the ice. 3.2. UV ionization, photodissociation and photodesorption In addition to ionizing and dissociating gas phase species, UV photons also desorb molecules from grain mantles. The UV flux generated by a young star has been observed by France et al. (2014) who found a me- dian value of 1000 ISRF (1 ISRF = 1.6 × 10−3 ergs−1 cm−2; Habing (1968)) at 100 AU. Theoretical studies of Alexander et al. (2006) suggest a UV flux of ∼ 50 ISRF at 100 AU is required to drive photoevaporation of the disk. We choose a UV flux between these two values of 500 ISRF at 100 AU. The UV field is attenuated by the disk and the re- sulting visual extinction can be related to the column density by AV (r, z) = 5.2 × 10−22 × fH Σr(r, z) 2mH , (3) where fH = 0.735 is the mass fraction of hydrogen in the Sun (Grevesse & Sauval 1998), and Σr(r, z) is the horizontal column density integrated from the inner edge of the disk. For photodesorption we adopt the reaction rate of Hol- lenbach et al. (2009) k(r, z) = F (r, z) × 108 × (πa2)×Y, (4) where F(r,z) is the UV flux in ISRF, πa2 is the grain cross-section and Y is the photodesorption yield. The average grain radius a is taken to be 1 µm, and Y is as- sumed to be 10−3 for all molecules (based on laboratory measurements of H2O photodesorption by Lyα photons (Westley et al. 1995a, b). For the self-shielding of CO and H2 we use the method of van Dishoeck & Black (1988) and Lee et al. (1996) respectively. 3.3. X-ray photoionization We follow the X-ray ionization prescription of Bai & Goodman (2009), using a value of the ionization rate for direct absorption of X-rays, ζabs = 6 x 10−12 s−1, and for scattered photons, ζsca = 10−15 s−1 (Igea & Glassgold 1999). We assume a stellar X-ray luminos- ity LX = 20 × 1029 erg s−1 based on the median ob- served value from a Chandra survey of solar mass young stars in the Orion Nebula (Garmire et al. 2000). Simi- lar values have also been observed in the Taurus-Auriga complex by Telleschi et al. (2007) and Robrade et al. (2014). The X-ray ionization rate is assumed to be the same for all reactions because of the lack of laboratory measurements. 3.4. Cosmic Rays Cosmic rays can ionize and dissociate molecules in the gas directly, or by producing secondary photons (Gredel et al. 1989). The intensity of cosmic rays decreases ex- ponentially with a characteristic attenuation depth of 96 g cm−2 (Umebayashi & Nakano 1981, 2009). The large penetration depth means that our model disk is trans- parent to cosmic rays outside of 4 AU at the beginning of the T Tauri phase and outside of 3 AU at the end of 3 Myr evolution. Cosmic ray reaction rates are taken from UMIST06 with an assumed cosmic ray ionization rate of 1.3 × 10−17 s−1. 3.5. A summary of ionization processes Ionization rates contributed by the above three ioniz- ing sources are shown in Fig. 4. The upper left panel shows an order-of-magnitude estimate of the UV ion- ization rate based on the H2O molecule, which is the molecule most commonly ionized by UV. The ionization rate decreases very rapidly due to the small penetra- tion depth of UV photons, and it is negligible except for the very surface layer of the disk. X-rays are able to reach most of the disk except for the inner 10 AU near the disk midplane (shown in the upper right panel in Fig. 4). They provide ionization rates of 10−14 s−1 to 10−13 s−1 near the disk surface, and a modest ioniza- tion rate around 10−17 s−1 in the disk interior due to scattering. In the lower left panel, we show the cosmic- ray ionization rate of H2, the most common cosmic- ray reaction partner. Cosmic rays provide a steady ionization rate around 10−17 s−1 throughout the disk. The fractional contribution of X-ray ionization is plot- ted in the lower right panel of Fig. 4. Roughly speak- ing, X-rays dominate the ionization rate above one scale height of the disk where the vertical column density is less than a few g cm−2, and the cosmic ray ionization dominates the disk interior within one scale height of the midplane. Cosmic ray-induced photons are abun- dant enough to cause ionization and photodissociation throughout the disk due to the efficient penetration of cosmic rays. Ionization rates due to cosmic ray-induced photons are different for each reactant and are not shown in Fig. 4. However, cosmic ray-induced photons are im- portant contributors to the chemical evolution. Cleeves et al. (2013a) showed that stellar winds can power a "T-Tauriosphere" that shields the disk from ex- ternal cosmic rays, leading to cosmic ray ionization rates of 10−18 s−1 or lower. A decreased cosmic-ray flux would reduce the rates of reactions with both cosmic rays and cosmic ray-induced photons. On the other hand, the decay of shortlived radionuclides (SLRs) such as 26Al 5 can provide an ionization rate on the order of 10−19 s−1 to 10−18 s−1 (Cleeves et al. 2013b), which may help to drive the chemistry in the disk interior. Since our chem- ical evolution models are computationally expensive, we do not explore different values of ionization rates. 4. CHEMICAL MODEL RESULTS The results of our chemical model give the abundances of CO isotopologues that we need for the optical depth calculation. First, we discuss the ice line locations for different volatiles (Section 4.1). Knowing the ice line locations is important for interpreting observed radial abundance gradients. Second, we discuss the active reaction network involving carbon-bearing molecules, which causes the CO abundance to change with both radius and time (Section 4.2). In Section 4.3, we demon- strate that dissociation of CO and subsequent forma- tion of complex organic molecules (COM) can produce CO depletion that mimics an ice line. In Section 4.4, we assess how computational limits on the number of species in our reaction network impact our COM abun- dances. We discuss our model's dependence on initial cloud abundances, reaction rates, and grain evolution in Section 4.5. We show that despite the uncertainty in the exact end product of COM formation, the formation of ices as carbon sinks on grain surfaces is robust, and leads to the depletion of CO in the gas phase. In order to connect the abundances of rare CO isotopologues with the overall disk mass, we examine the carbon fraction- ation in CO and other major carbon-bearing molecules in section 4.6. 4.1. Locations of ice lines Due to efficient heating from the central star, CO and CH4 do not freeze out in our modeled region -- the inner 70 AU of the disk -- at any time in our 3 Myr of evolution (though disks with different grain properties or less lumi- nous host stars may be colder than our model disk). Us- ing CO isotopologues to estimate planet-forming mass therefore does not require correcting for CO freezeout, at least in disks surrounding proto-Sunlike stars. However, as we will see in Section 4.3, freezeout of other organic molecules affects the gaseous CO abundance. H2O and CO2 freeze out at 1.5 AU and 18 AU at the beginning of disk evolution, and their condensation fronts move inward to 1 AU and 2 AU as the disk becomes cooler. We see ices of hydrocarbons and other carbon-bearing molecules formed from CO after a few hundred thou- sand years of disk evolution. The abundance of an ice depends on both condensation temperature and forma- tion pathway: a molecule may have been chemically de- stroyed and simply not be present to freeze out. Our discussion of ice lines focuses only on locations where the relevant molecule exists. We defer the discussion of molecule formation and destruction to the next two sections. The binding energies and the locations where different ice species exist after 3 Myr of disk evolution are shown in Table 3. Species with larger binding energy can form stronger bonds with the grain surface, and therefore freeze out at higher temperature. In our model, species with binding energy larger than EB/k = 2.5 × 103 K can freeze out well within the giant planet-forming re- gion at (cid:46) 15 AU (Tsiganis et al. 2005; Thommes et al. 2002); species with binding energy of 2.1 × 103 K can only freeze out in the outer part of the disk or at later stage of evolution when the temperature is lower, and species with binding energy lower than 103 K -- including CO -- do not freeze out. The condensation of volatiles is important for the growth of planets due to the increase of available solid surface density (Dodson-Robinson & Bodenheimer 2010; Ali-Dib et al. 2014b), and is crucial for determining the chemical composition of giant planets ( Oberg et al. 2011b). Moreover, the effect of radial drift and gas ac- cretion may cause further movement of ice lines and changes in chemical composition (Ali-Dib et al. 2014a; Piso et al. 2015). However, the above studies assumed CO to be a major carrier of carbon and oxygen, which may not be true throughout the disk evolution. Our re- sults indicate that it is important to take into account the possibility that CO ice is not a mass source for giant planets in some systems. Instead, CO2, hydrocarbons, and methanol may be the major carbon ice reservoirs that contribute to planet growth. Furthermore, because of the unprecedented sensitiv- ity and resolving power of (sub)mm interferometers such as the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), the location of the CO ice line has been con- sidered an important temperature tracer of giant planet- forming regions (Qi et al. 2011, 2013). Qi et al. (2013) use observations of N2H+, which CO destroys, to infer a CO snow line radius of ∼ 30 AU in the disk surrounding TW Hya. If some combinations of grain size, star lumi- nosity and UV/X-ray/cosmic-ray flux push CO ice lines outside of 70 AU, CO freezeout may not trace the region of giant planet formation. Even TW Hya, at 0.8 M(cid:12) and 10 Myr, is luminous enough to push its disk's CO snow line beyond the likely formation locations of Uranus and Neptune in the solar nebula. 4.2. Time evolution and spatial distribution of CO gas Inferring disk structure based on CO line intensity is complicated by the fact that the abundance of CO evolves significantly as a function of time. In the in- ner 20 AU from the central star when the temperature is high enough for CO2 to be in the gas phase, CO2 is dissociated into CO + O by cosmic ray-induced photons 6 at a rate around 10−18 per second, which leads to an in- crease of CO abundance on a 1 Myr time scale. On the other hand, although CO does not freeze out in our mod- eled region within 70 AU, the abundance of CO drops beyond 15 AU because carbon is tied up in hydrocar- bons, methanol, and ketene (complex organic molecules or COMs), mimicking the effect of CO freezeout. Abun- dant carbon-bearing species include C2H2 (acetylene), C2H5, CH3CHO (acetaldehyde), CH3OH (methanol), and H2CCO (ketene). The CO depletion rate is driven by the ionization rate of He+ from X-rays and cosmic rays, as He+ drives the breakup of CO (section 4.3). The depletion of CO beyond 15 AU happens on a 1 Myr time scale. As a result, the CO abundance depends strongly both on location and time. As long as the disk is opaque to the UV photons that dissociate CO, the column den- sity of CO can increase in the inner part of the disk even as the overall disk mass is decreasing. Color-coded plots of abundances of major carbon- bearing molecules are shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6. We see abundant CO within 15 AU from the central star, and abundant CO2 ice in parts of the disk where the temperature is low enough for it to stay on the grain surface. H2CCO (ketene) ice is found to be the major carbon sink between 5 AU and 45AU from the central star in our model. Other COMs such as C2Hx, CH3OH (methanol) and CH3CHO (acetaldehyde) exist in a layer between 2 − 30 AU, closer to the disk surface, or the whole disk thickness beyond 40 AU from the central star (lower right panel of Fig. 5). Again, the change of abun- dance can be very gradual. Here we quote the boundary location where 10% of carbon is stored in corresponding species. At the end of our 3 Myr disk evolution, 13.6% of available carbon is contained in CO gas, 36.2% in CO2 ice, and 44.8% in complex organic molecules. The above values are integrated over the entire disk, weighted by the disk mass in different locations. A detailed break- down of abundances of various species can be found in the first column of Table 5. We present abundances in the form of percentage of carbon contained in each species, integrated over the entire disk, and weighted by disk mass in different locations. The time evolution of the CO/H2 abundance ratio (Fig. 7) over 3 Myr is substantial. The variation is not well-represented by a step function as in simple freeze- out models. Models of CO abundance versus radius ap- propriate to the star's age must be used to compute available planet-forming mass from CO isotopologue line intensities. While this paper does not contain a parameter study of CO/H2 abundance ratio as a function of disk mass and UV/X-ray/cosmic-ray flux, we suggest that flux in high- velocity line wings (produced by CO gas near the star) may increase as the star ages, even despite an overall 7 reduction in disk mass. Furthermore, depletion of CO gas in the outer disk does not necessarily mean there is CO frozen on grain surfaces, an idea we explore further in the next section. 4.3. CO depletion due to the formation of complex organic molecules Here we investigate the causes of CO depletion in the outer disk, beyond 15 AU. As we can see in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, H2CCO (ketene) ice is the dominant form of carbon within 45 AU from the central star in the CO- depleted region. Beyond 45 AU, CH3OH, C2Hx, and CH3CHO ice are more abundant. To demonstrate the chemical evolution in these two different locations, we plot the abundances of major carbon-bearing molecules as a function of time in Fig. 7 for two locations of the disk: 38 AU on the midplane and 60 AU on the mid- plane. At 38 AU on the midplane, the depletion of CO hap- pens in three stages. In stage 1, the first 0.6 Myr, CH4 and CO react to form C2H2 through two different paths (Path 1 and Path 2, see the next paragraph for de- tails), both of which depend on the existence of CH4 gas. This leads to a net destruction of CO and methane and increase in C2H2 abundance. C2H2 freezes out on grain surfaces, but because of the low binding energy of C2H3, C2H2 can not efficiently hydrogenate until the temperature decreases. The formation of more complex organic molecules such as H2CCO and C2H5 happens roughly between 0.6 to 1.5 Myr (Stage 2) and only after the reactions in Stage 1 have already begun to deplete CO. CH3OH ice forms in Stage 3 after the formation of H2CCO and C2H5 ices. The CO gas abundance contin- ues to decrease through all three stages. At 60 AU on the midplane where temperature is lower, C2H3 can stay on the grain surface and hydrogenate to C2H5 early in the disk evolution. We see rapid C2H5 formation in the first 0.6 Myr, and the formation of hydrocarbons stops after CH4 is depleted. Instead, the net transfer of carbon is from CO to CH3OH. The formation of COM primarily follows two paths: reactions between CHx radicals (Path 1), and ion- neutral reactions between C+ and CHx (Path 2). The first pathway starts from CH4 dissociation by secondary photons (hν) generated by cosmic ray ionization: hν + CH4 → CH2 + H2. (5) CH2 then reacts to form CH and subsequently com- bines with CH4 to form C2H4. H + CH2 → CH + H2 CH + CH4 → C2H4 + H. (6) (7) Similar reactions involving other CHx radicals include: CH2 + CH2 → C2H3 + H C + CH3 → C2H2 + H. (8) (9) In a relatively high temperature and hydrogen rich environment, C2H3 and C2H4 formed in above reactions quickly react into a more stable form - C2H2. C2H+ 3 + C2H4 → C2H+ H + C2H3 → C2H2 + H2. 5 + C2H2 (10) (11) While the major carbon source for the first pathway is CH4, this pathway also creates molecules that react with byproducts of CO destruction. Since CO abundance is our focus in this work, we direct our attention to the second pathway. The reaction network that moves car- bon from CO into COM is sketched in Fig. 8. The formation of COM following CO destruction is primar- ily driven by helium ionized by cosmic rays and X-rays. Of the resulting He+ ions, more than half go on to dis- sociate CO (creating C+ and O), while other He+ ions end up ionizing molecules such as H2, C2H2, N2 and CH4. C+ rapidly reacts with CH4 and CH3 to form hydrocarbon ions. Hydrocarbon ions can go through a series of charge-exchange reactions until they eventu- ally recombine with an electron to form neutral hydro- carbons. If the binding energy of the resulting neutral molecule is large enough, the neutral will quickly freeze onto the grain surface and remove carbon from the gas- phase chemistry. Key reactions that initiate hydrocar- bon formation are: He+ + CO → O + C+ + He C+ + CH4 → C2H+ 3 + H C+ + CH4 → C2H+ 2 + H2 C+ + CH3 → C2H+ + H2. reaction chain terminates full (12) (13) (14) (15) This in frozen-out methanol, acetaldehyde, and ketene sinks (see Fig. 8). The electrons with which the C2-based hydrocarbon ions eventually recombine come mostly from cosmic-ray and X-ray ionization of H2. However, unlike He+, H+ 2 does not contribute to hydrocarbon formation directly. The majority of H+ 2 initiates HCO+ formation through: 2 + H2 → H+ H+ 3 + CO → HCO+ + H2. H+ 3 + H (17) (16) Reactions involving HCO+ often change the charge and/or saturation of a hydrocarbon (e.g. C2H2+ HCO+ → CO + C2H+ 3 ), but do not contribute to the initial formation of the carbon-carbon bond. After hydrocarbon ions recombine with electrons, the 8 resulting neutral molecules may freeze onto grain sur- faces. The dissociative recombination reactions C2H+ C2H+ C2H+ C2H+ C2H+ 3 + e− → C2H + 2H 3 + e− → C2H2 + H 4 + e− → C2H2 + 2H 5 + e− → C2H2 + H2 + H 5 + e− → C2H3 + 2H (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) contribute the most to the total neutral C2Hx abun- dance, and to the C2Hx ice budget (recombination path- ways are marked with e− in figure 8). As a result, the reaction of CO with He+ starts a chain that moves car- bon atoms from CO to hydrocarbons on million-year timescales. 4.4. Chemical pathways in the formation of complex organic molecules We have seen how the CO abundance beyond 20 AU decreases over time due to complex organic molecule (COM) formation. Here we trace the chemical path- ways that transfer carbon from CO to COM and assess whether the outer-disk CO depletion is robust given the construction of our reaction network. 4.4.1. Ketene as a carbon sink Our chemical model does not include any molecule with more than two carbon atoms. Without more com- plex species available for reaction outcomes, H2CCO (ketene) is the most abundant two-carbon molecule found in our model and serves as a "sink" for frozen-out carbon on the grain surfaces (as seen in Fig. 5). The low binding energy of C2H3 also contributes to the H2CCO abundance by shutting off the hydrogenation pathway from C2H3 to C2H6 on the grain surfaces and ensuring that saturation must take place in the gas phase. (The binding energies of abundant COMs are shown in Table 3.) Finally, the activation barrier of E/kB = 1210 K for the reaction C2H2 + H → C2H3 (Hasegawa et al., 1992), which has to break the strong C -- C triple bond, means that at the cold temperatures required for acety- lene to freeze onto grain surfaces, hydrogenation pro- ceeds slowly. The most common reaction for C2H3 in the gas phase is C2H3 + H → C2H2 + H2, (23) followed by C2H2 re-freezing onto grain surfaces. A small fraction of C2H3 gas reacts with ions such as C2H+ 3 , HCO+, and forms more saturated hydrocarbons, then refreezes onto dust grains: 3 → C2H+ C2H3 + C2H+ C2H3 + HCO+ → C2H+ 5 + C2H, 4 + CO. (24) (25) At the same time, a small fraction of C2H3 forms a double bond with free oxygen released in Eq. 12: C2H3 + O → H2CCO + H. (26) Since H2CCO has very high binding energy (only slightly smaller than CO2), and we are not including de- struction of H2CCO ice other than desorption, H2CCO ice serves as a sink for COM in our model. Although the rate for reaction 26 is low, ketene can neverthe- less accumulate on million-year timescales. The reaction pathway leading to ketene formation is sketched in the lower left part of Fig. 8, with the sink molecule H2CCO enclosed in a solid box. One should note that ketene is a representative of the presence of complex organic molecules in our model. In a real disk, other forms of COM will likely exist. Densities on grain surfaces are usually much higher than in the gas phase, so reactions such as hydrogenation on grain surfaces typically happen very quickly. How- ever, due to the rapid thermal desorption of C2H3 from the grain surface, more saturated hydrocarbons cannot be formed efficiently. In most of the disk within 40 AU, only a small amount of more saturated C2 hydrocarbons can be formed in the gas phase through ion-neutral re- actions, with a negligible amount formed though hydro- genation on the grain surface. 4.4.2. Acetaldehyde as a carbon sink Ketene is no longer the sink in regions where the tem- perature is high enough for it to be in the gas phase, or where the temperature is low enough for C2H3 to stay on the grain surface and continue hydrogenating to form more saturated hydrocarbons. In those regions, ice molecules such as CH3CHO (acetaldehyde), CH3OH (methanol), and C2H5 (ethyl) serve as the carbon sinks, keeping carbon from re-entering the gas phase. Green lines in Fig. 8 show the ketene recycling path- way in a small region below the disk surface between 10 − 30 AU, where the temperature is high enough that H2CCO stays in the gas phase and the ionization rate is (cid:38) 10−15 s−1. H2CCO gas reacts with C+ to form CH2CO+: C+ + H2CCO → CH2CO+ + C. (27) CH2CO+ then recombines with an electron and under- goes one of three dissociative recombination reactions to form C2, C2H2, or CO, with roughly equal branching ratios (see green lines leading from CH2CO molecule in lower left corner of Fig. 8). Moreover, due to the high ionization rate, the rate of reaction 12 can be as much as twice the value on the disk midplane. The abun- dance of free hydrogen atoms is also high due to pho- todissociation of H2 and H2O. Efficient C+ production and high atomic hydrogen abundance speed the produc- tion of C2H2 and allow more saturated hydrocarbons to form on grain surfaces, despite the volatility of C2H3. The temperature in the region is high enough for C2H5 to evaporate into the gas phase once it is formed. C2H5 then reacts with atomic oxygen to from the more stable molecule CH3CHO (acetaldehyde), which refreezes on to the grain surface due to its high binding energy and serves as another carbon sink: O + C2H5 → CH3CHO + H. (28) To summarize, the acetaldehyde-forming reaction path- way (Fig. 8) differs from the ketene-forming pathway simply because of the warmer temperature that keeps ketene in the gas phase, the high C+ abundance from reaction 12, and the high atomic hydrogen abundance. Note that our reaction network does not include the grain-surface hydrogenation pathway C2H5 +H → C2H6 (ethane ice). However, Dodson-Robinson et al. (2009) found low grain-surface hydrogenation efficiency, lead- ing to significant amounts of ethane ice only near the acetylene sublimation temperature of 55 K. 4.4.3. Ethyl and methanol as carbon sinks In the outer disk where r > 50 AU, and after 1 Myr in most of the disk, C2H3 is able to stay on the grain surface and hydrogenate to C2H5, and C2H5 serves as a carbon sink. Due to the lack of C2H3 in the gas phase, and the low temperature that allows H2CO to freeze out, the reaction O + CH3 → H2CO + H (29) becomes the dominant reaction with atomic oxygen, rather than reaction 26. H2CO then freezes onto the grain surface, reacts with H atoms on the grain surface, and finally forms CH3OH (methanol), another carbon sink in our model, as follows (letter G denotes species that are frozen out on grain surfaces): GH + GH2CO → GCH2OH GH + GCH2OH → GCH3OH. (30) (31) This reaction path explains the evolution of abun- dances of carbon-bearing molecules demonstrated in the lower panel of Figure 7. These reactions start to happen at r > 60 AU where the temperature is about 35 K, and at 20 AU on the midplane at 2.5 Myr when the temper- ature drops below 44 K. In summary, as Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 show, H2CCO dominates in most of the COM-forming region where the temperature is low enough for H2CCO to remain on the grain surface, but high enough for C2H3 to evaporate into the gas phase. In the small region above the disk midplane (r = 10 − 35 AU, z = 1 − 4 AU), where the temperature is high enough for H2CCO and C2H5 to 9 stay in the gas phase and atomic hydrogen is abundant, CH3CHO serves as the sink for carbon chemistry. In the outer region where the temperature is low enough for C2H3 to stay on the grain surface and hydrogenate to C2H5, we are seeing CH3OH and C2H5 as the end products of COM chemistry. The reaction pathways described above demonstrate how H2CCO, CH3CHO, C2H2 and CH3OH stand in for complex organic molecules in our model. In reality, organic molecules may grow more complex as ketene, acetaldehyde, ethyl, and methanol ice react with other species in ways not included in our model. Despite our upper limit of two carbon atoms per molecule, the net movement of carbon from CO to ices should be a robust result for ionized regions that contain CH4 gas. In or- der to demonstrate that our reaction network does not falsely predict carbon depletion from the gas phase, we investigate an alternative network with a low ketene for- mation rate in the next section. We also compare our model abundances with results from the c2d (cores to disks) Spitzer Legacy Program as summarized by Oberg et al. (2011a), and discuss the effect of different assump- tions about grain evolution. 4.5. Model dependence on reaction rates, initial conditions, and grain evolution models Our model results depend on the disk physical condi- tions, initial cloud phase abundances, and reaction rates. In this section, we present a detailed study of how results depend on reaction rates, initial abundances, and grain evolution. In section 4.5.1, we verify that our ketene ice sink does not artificially remove carbon from the gas phase by running a model with the ketene formation rate decreased by 10 orders of magnitude. In Section 4.5.2, we compare the abundances from our molecular cloud preprocessing model with the ice abundances ob- served by the Spitzer c2d team in the envelopes of low- mass protostars ( Oberg et al. 2011a). In Section 4.5.3, we investigate the effects of grain evolution on the disk temperature and chemistry. Our current model cannot consider gaps or inner holes without significant modifications. The effects of such structures on chemical evolution requires further study. 4.5.1. Models with low H2CCO formation rates The formation of carbon sinks such as ketene greatly reduces the gas-phase CO abundance in our model and suggests that observations of CO depletion may trace complex-molecule formation instead of freezeout of CO. In this section, we test the robustness of our result by artificially suppressing ketene formation rates. The CO abundance is independent of the exact form of carbon- bearing ice as long as our model does not artificially remove carbon from the gas phase. However, having H2CCO ice instead of C2Hx ice as a sink in the model can potentially reduce the amount of oxygen in the gas phase, therefore affecting the CO abundance. To test the effect of H2CCO formation rate on CO abundance, we ran the chemical model with H2CCO formation rates artificially turned down by ten orders of magnitude while keeping other parameters the same. We compare output abundances at the end of the 3 Myr evolution of this experiment with those from our fiducial COM-forming model (described in Section 4.3) in Table 5. The H2CCO formation is strongly suppressed as ex- pected, resulting in a negligible abundance. Without the pathways that convert hydrocarbons (C2Hx) to ketene, the abundance of hydrocarbons (C2Hx) is significantly higher, but most other abundances show little change. The gas-phase CO abundance increases from 13.6% to 17.3% of the elemental carbon. To summarize, the choice of end-member species in the chemical reaction network can affect the gaseous CO abundance. Translating observed CO isotopologue line intensities into disk surface densities would include an uncertainty of at least a factor of two for any given disk annulus. However, the effect of the ketene sink on the CO gas abundance in our modeled 70 AU disk as a whole is small. One would be able to translate a measurement of the mass of C17O or C18O gas in the planet-forming region of a disk into a total mass available for giant planet formation without large uncertainties due to the chemistry of complex organic molecule formation. 4.5.2. Comparing with the c2d cloud abundances We test the sensitivity to initial conditions in our chemical reaction network by comparing the abundances at the end of our molecular cloud preprocessing model with measured ice abundances in low-mass protostel- lar envelopes. Oberg et al. (2011a) combined Spitzer/ IRS spectra for about 50 low-mass protostars with in- frared ice features with near-infrared ground-based ob- servations of ice features such as 3µm H2O, 4.65µm CO, and 3.53µm CH3OH, presenting an overview of the ice inventory during the embedded phase of star formation. Because the absolute ice abundances vary from source to source, Oberg et al. (2011a) presented the median ice abundance ratio with respect to water ice abundance in the combined sample. The chemical compositions ob- served in low-mass protostellar envelopes are expected to be similar to those at the end of the molecular cloud phase, because the materials are not yet heavily heated by the central star or processed by shocks. We compare c2d observed ice abundance ratios and outputs of our cloud phase model (as described in Sec- tion 3.1) in the first two columns of Table 4. The CO2, CH4, and CO abundances with respect to the water ice 10 abundance in our cloud model are about 1.2, 5, and 0.5 times the values observed in nearby star-forming regions, respectively ( Oberg et al. 2011a). While not an exact match, our computed abundances relative to water ice are of the same order of magnitude as observed values for major carbon-bearing species. To test how our disk model varies based on small changes in input abundances, we conduct an experiment using the Oberg et al. (2011a) observed abundances as the initial conditions for the chemical evolution, while keeping other parameters the same. We keep the same abundances as predicted by our molecular cloud model for H2O ice and minor species not observed by the c2d team, but scale the abundances of other c2d-observed ices to match the c2d results. The abundances pre- dicted by the molecular cloud model, and the abun- dances adjusted according to c2d ratios, are listed in the last two columns of Table 4. This experiment is only to demonstrate the model dependence on initial input abundances. We do not conserve the total number of C and O atoms per hydrogen atom by artificially scaling the molecular abundances. The change of input abundances does not change CO abundance significantly in our experiment. Integrated over the entire disk, the total available carbon in the form of CO gas increases from 13.6% to 18.3%, while the carbon locked in COM decreases from 44.8% to 37.0% However, the dominant kind of COM is different from that of the standard model. Due to the signifi- cantly lower input methane abundance, the percentage of molecules that contain two carbon atoms is only one third of the value in the fiducial model, and the methanol abundance is three times the original value. The paucity of ices that contain two carbon atoms when the initial methane abundance is low suggests that even though the formation of the carbon-carbon bond relies on both CH4 and C+ liberated from CO, the formation of car- bon chain depends largely on the methane abundance the disk inherits from the cloud. We find that the abundances predicted by our molec- ular cloud model agree with observational results within a factor of two. In our experiment, adjusting the abun- dances inherited by the disk to match observed abun- dances in cold protostar envelopes can lead to a higher abundance of methanol and a smaller overall COM abundance than in our fiducial model. However, the computed CO abundance is only 1.35 times higher. 4.5.3. Different models of grain evolution In the fiducial model, we assume 90% by mass of the of dust has already grown to larger than mm size, and use a gas to dust ratio of 1000 throughout. However, grain evolution could be slower than what we assume. Specifically, the disk could have a larger portion of dust than what we assumed at the beginning of the evolu- tion. Small dust grains provide most of the opacity that is important for heating and attenuating UV and x- ray radiation, and they also provide most of the surface area available for freeze-out and grain surface reactions. Miotello et al. (2014) have found that the evolution of dust grains can change the disk opacity, which can fur- ther increase the significance of isotopologue-selective photodissociation, and change the CO fractionation. To investigate the effect of grain evolution, we con- struct a series of models with gas to dust ratio gradually evolving from 100 to 1000, assuming the same opacity profile for the dust grains. We choose to change the gas to dust ratio to trace the loss of solid material to bigger bodies, rather than changing the grain size distribution, because a balance between collisional aggregation and fragmentation yields a size distribution whose slope at the small end is insensitive to the dust abundance (Birn- stiel et al. 2011). In the models considering grain evolution, the total dust opacities are larger than those in the fiducial model, resulting in lower disk temperature. On average, the disk temperature is 10% lower at 100 yr where the gas- to-dust ratio is 10 times the fiducial value, and 5% lower at 1 Myr when the gas-to-dust ratio is one third of the fiducial value. The output abundances averaged over the entire disk are presented in the last column of Table 4. Despite the decrease of temperature, the carbon content in the grain evolution model is very similar to that in our fiducial model by the end of the 3 Myr evolution. This is be- cause CO depletion happens on a Myr time scale when grain evolution has already started, and the grain sur- face area is not limiting the freeze-out time scale as long as some dust grains are present. The final CO abun- dance relative to total carbon decreases from 13.6% in the standard model to 11.8% in this model, a change in the opposite direction to that found in the other model variations. The difference between the two models is largest at 1 Myr, when the CO/C ratio is 27.5% in the standard model and 21.8% in the grain evolution model. Unlike in Miotello et al. (2014), considering grain evo- lution does not significantly change abundance ratios of CO isotopologues in our models. We defer detailed dis- cussions on isotopic ratios to section 4.6. 4.6. Fractionation of CO isotopologues In addition to understanding the formation and de- struction pathways of CO, one also needs to know how C and O isotopes fractionate among different molecules in order to link 13CO, C17O, and C18O observations with disk masses. The isotopologue ratio in CO and the ma- jor carbon sink H2CCO are presented in Figure 9. The CO/13CO ratio is close to the elemental isotopic value 11 of 77.15 in the inner 15 AU where CO gas is abundant. In regions where CO is depleted, the CO/13CO ratio is about 45, much smaller than the input atomic abun- dance ratio. The low CO/13CO ratio is inherited from the molecular cloud model. In the inner disk, where new CO molecules are form- ing from recycled ketene that originally gained its car- bon atoms from both CH4 and CO, the CO/13CO ratio approaches the input, atomic C/13C ratio. Integrated over the entire disk, the average CO/13CO ratio is 59.15. Disk mass estimates based on optically thin 13CO rota- tional emission (possible beyond ∼ 18 AU; see Section 5) should account for isotopic fractionation. In the shielded interior of our disk, we predict C16O/C17O and C16O/C18O ratios similar to those measured by Smith et al. (2009) from observations of the envelope of protostar Reipurth 50. Our computed CO/C17O and CO/C18O ratios are slightly smaller than the input 16O/17O = 2300 and 16O/18O = 500 ratios throughout most of the disk, though the recycling of ketene back to CO pushes C16O/C17O and C16O/C18O higher near the disk surface. The CO oxygen isotope fractionation identified in our model has an average ef- fect of less than 14% (averaged over mass). We find that oxygen isotope fractionation would not significantly bias disk mass estimates based on C17O or C18O emission. We also caution against over-interpretation of the oxy- gen isotope fractionation found in this model, as vari- ations in UV flux that are well within observed ranges (France et al. 2014) can affect isotope ratios. In Miotello et al. (2014), UV radiation is not attenuated efficiently in disks with only larger grains. Rare CO isotopologues only exist in a smaller region further below the disk sur- face due to photo-dissociation, resulting in larger CO to rare CO ratios. In contrast, our models include a pop- ulation of small dust grains even for models with grain evolution (Section 4.5.3), and therefore the UV radia- tion is sufficiently absorbed. Moreover, following Landry et al. (2013), our disk models only follow the disk up to about two scale heights, and do not follow the disk atmosphere, where photochemical reactions matter the most. This explains why unlike in Miotello et al. (2014), considering grain evolution does not significantly change the CO isotopologue ratios. Having verified that our predicted 13CO, C18O, and C17O abundances are robust results that (1) do not de- pend heavily on our reaction network choice and (2) closely track observed values, we are now ready to cal- culate the optical depths of rotational emission lines. 5. OPTICAL DEPTH OF ROTATIONAL EMISSION FROM CO ISOTOPOLOGUES Our goal is to demonstrate that rare CO isotopologues can provide a window into the planet formation zone 12 through their rotational emission lines. The ideal emis- sion line would be optically thin all the way to the disk midplane, but still detectable with ALMA. We calcu- late the optical depth of CO rotational emission lines at each disk radius by integrating the absorption efficiency through the disk. We first calculate the total absorption efficiency across the emission line as (cid:90) kνdν = hνij c (niBij − njBji) , in which Bji = Bij = Bij, gi gj 8π3 3h2 µij2, ni = finx. (32) (33) (34) (35) (cid:90) kν is the absorption coefficient, ni, and nj are the num- ber of molecules in states i and j (i is the lower state), and fi and fj are the fraction of molecules in states i and j. gi and gj are the degeneracies; νij is the frequency of the transition; µij is the matrix element of the electric dipole moment for the transition; and Bij and Bji are the Einstein coefficients of the transition. Substituting into equation 32, we have: (cid:20) (cid:18)−hνij (cid:19)(cid:21) . kT kνdν = hνij c finx 8π3 3h2 µij2 1 − exp (36) We take fi as the local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) value set by the Boltzmann distribution. To estimate the absorption at the line center k0, we divide the total absorption efficiency by the full-width half-maximum ∆ν of the Doppler broadening profile: ∆ν = 2.355 × ν2 0 kT M c2 , (37) where M is the mass of the molecule. We then have (cid:114) (cid:82) kνdν ∆ν k0 = . (38) Finally, we compute face-on optical depths as a function of distance from the star by integrating the absorption efficiency k0 over the disk's vertical direction as (cid:90) zsurf ace 0 τ0 = k0dz. (39) The optical depths of J= 1 → 0 lines for CO isotopo- logues are shown in the upper panels of Figure 10. The upper-left panel shows optical depths after 100 years of disk evolution (i.e., a disk surrounding a just-emerged T-Tauri star), and the upper-right panel shows the disk after 3 Myr of evolution. We highlight the J= 1 → 0 transition because the temperature of CO gas is rela- tively high compared to the energy needed to excite the J = 1 rotational level (5.5K), therefore J = 1 → 0 line is the most optically thin line among low order rotational lines observable with ALMA. We can immediately see that C17O traces the disk midplane outside 8 AU, and C18O traces the midplane outside 12 AU. Observations of C17O and C18O emission from nearby disks would provide estimates of the amount of mass available to form planets like Uranus and Neptune, and place a lower limit on the mass available to form Jupiter and Saturn. The optical depth of C17O as a function of radius is plotted for several epochs in the lower left panel of Fig- ure 10. The optical depth is a strong function of radius and time. The optical depth in the inner part of the disk increases as the disk evolves due to the dissocia- tion of CO2 into CO, while the optical depth beyond 15 AU first increases, but then decreases and falls below the initial value due to the formation of more complex carbon-bearing molecules (sections 4.2, 4.3). At 3 Myr the optical depth remains above one out to about 42 AU for CO, 18 AU for 13CO, 12 AU for C18O, and 8 AU for C17O. The possibility that CO abundance changes over time due to chemical reactions means that disk masses measured by CO emission are degenerate with age. Continuum emission from dust also contributes flux at the frequencies of CO emission lines. Even if the emission from a CO isotopologue is optically thin, high optical depth in the dust could prevent us from see- ing the disk midplane. To estimate the optical depth contributed by the dust, we integrate the dust opacity at the relevant wavelength over the disk height. We use opacities from Semenov et al. (2003), for grains with a 5-layered sphere topology. As in the thermo- dynamic model (see Section 2 for details), we use a gas to dust mass ratio of 1000. We assume the dust has undergone some degree of grain growth, with remain- ing solids locked into larger bodies, consistent with our RADMC dust radiative transfer models. Optical depth contributed by dust is plotted in the lower right panel of Figure 10. The optical depths contributed by dust are almost the same for all isotopologues due to the small shift in frequency between emission lines, so we are only showing the frequency at the center of CO transitions. The optical depths contributed by dust are smallest for the J= 1 → 0 line due to lower frequency - less than one beyond 2 AU, and less than 0.1 beyond 10 AU. The dust optical depth for higher order transitions become less then one within 10 AU. For low-mass disks that have experienced some grain growth, C17O is a promising tracer of the disk midplane in the giant planet-forming region. Outside of 10 AU, where analogs to the Kuiper Belt may be forming (Bry- den et al. 2009), C18O and 13CO may be useful midplane tracers. Note, however, that our fiducial model is a low- mass disk (0.015 M(cid:12)), and the actual midplane locations traced by CO gas may therefore fall somewhat outside of 10 AU. However, our results demonstrate the value of observing CO isotopologues to reconstruct the mass distributions in the inner 30 AU of nearby disks. 6. CONCLUSIONS Our chemical model of an MRI-active protoplanetary disk has led to the following conclusions. CO does not freeze out anywhere in our modeled re- gion - the inner 70 AU of the disk - due to efficient heat- ing by stellar irradiation. Instead, the abundance of CO is a complex function of both radius and time. This de- pendence must be modeled correctly in order to deduce gas properties from observations of CO isotopologues. The fate of CO is tied up in the formation of complex organic molecules. While the detailed chemical evolu- tion depends on the input abundances from the molecu- lar cloud and which species are included in the network, the main result is robust to these variations. Different models of grain evolution also produce small changes in the outcomes. For three different chemical assump- tions and two different scenarios for grain evolution, the partition of carbon, integrated over the modeled inner 70 AU of the disk, ranges from 11.8% to 18.3% in CO gas, 31.0% to 38.4% in CO2 ice, and 37.0% to 45.0% in complex organic molecules. Fractionation of oxygen isotopes appears not to play a major role in C17O abundances, though stars with un- usually strong UV accretion luminosity may have disks depleted in C17O. The optical depth of low-J rotational lines of C17O are around unity in the giant planet form- ing region, while more common isotopologues are quite opaque. With our computed C17O/H2 abundance as a function of radius and an age, one would be able to translate the observed C17O line intensity into available planet-forming mass, to within a factor of a few. The optical depth of dust in the CO isotopologue (J= 1 → 0) transition wavelengths is small enough to allow observa- tions of the mid-plane beyond a few AU; for higher tran- sitions the dust will be opaque within 5-8 AU. However, this result relies on our assumption of grain evolution, in which 90% of the solid mass has accumulated in pebbles and larger solid objects at the start of disk evolution at 0.1 Myr, but our experiment with slower evolution of the gas to dust ratio produce similar results in the end. Looking ahead to future work, we emphasize that emission lines from the CO isotopologues all have dif- ferent optical depths and can probe different vertical layers of a target disk. Comparing line profiles of emission from multiple isotopologues could reveal ver- tical variations in turbulent velocity, and therefore con- strain the angular momentum transfer mechanism that drives the disk evolution. The current leading angu- lar momentum transfer mechanism -- MRI turbulence -- predicts non-turbulent "dead" zones on the disk mid- 13 plane, which leads to a decrease of the turbulent ve- locity toward the midplane (Fromang & Nelson (2006), Simon et al. (2011)). However, new models by Bai & Stone (2013) and Gressel et al. (2015) suggest that magnetocentrifugal winds are more likely to drive ac- cretion than the MRI. Aside from possibly driving ac- cretion, turbulence also determines the behavior of dust grains to a great extent. An observational investiga- tion of gas velocities in the midplanes of planet-forming disks would have profound implications for planetesimal growth models. ALMA is able to detect emission from multiple CO isotopologues in one observation. With its new long baselines and large collecting area, it is sen- sitive to the inner regions of disks, which have small emitting areas but contribute appreciably to line wings. CO observations may be able to probe not only the mass distribution in planet-forming regions, but the gas dy- namics as well. We conclude that CO isotopologue rotational emission can probe the mass distribution and chemical evolution of the inner radii of protostellar disks, allowing observers to peer directly into planet nurseries. Acknowledgments: Work by MY, KW, SDR and NJT was supported by NASA grant NNX10AH28G. NJE and MY were supported in part by NSF Grant AST-1109116 to the University of Texas at Austin. This work was performed in part at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. NJT was supported by grant 13-OSS13-0114 from the NASA Origins of So- lar Systems program. We are grateful to the referee for helpful suggestions. We would like to thank Ed- win Bergin, Jacob Simon, Ilse Cleeves, Jeong-Eun Lee, Seok-Ho Lee, Jeffrey Cuzzi, Paul Estrada, Colette Salyk, Karin Oberg, and Raquel Salmeron for useful discus- sions. Alexander, R. D., Clarke, C. J., & Pringle, J. E. 2006, MNRAS, Gressel, O., Turner, N. J., Nelson, R. P., & McNally, C. P. 2015, 369, 229 ApJ, 801, 84 REFERENCES Ali-Dib, M., Mousis, O., Petit, J.-M., & Lunine, J. I. 2014a, ApJ, 785, 125 -- . 2014b, ApJ, 793, 9 ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C. L., P´erez, L. M., et al. 2015, ApJL, 808, L3 Bai, X.-N., & Goodman, J. 2009, ApJ, 701, 737 Bai, X.-N., & Stone, J. M. 2013, ApJ, 769, 76 Balbus, S. A., & Hawley, J. F. 1991, ApJ, 376, 214 Banzatti, A., Testi, L., Isella, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 525, A12 Bergin, E. A., Cleeves, L. I., Gorti, U., et al. 2013, Nature, 493, 644 Birnstiel, T., Ormel, C. W., & Dullemond, C. P. 2011, A&A, 525, A11 Bryden, G., Beichman, C. A., Carpenter, J. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1226 Chiang, E. I., & Goldreich, P. 1997, ApJ, 490, 368 Cleeves, L. I., Adams, F. C., & Bergin, E. A. 2013a, ApJ, 772, 5 Cleeves, L. I., Adams, F. C., Bergin, E. A., & Visser, R. 2013b, ApJ, 777, 28 D'Antona, F., & Mazzitelli, I. 1994, ApJS, 90, 467 Dodson-Robinson, S. E., & Bodenheimer, P. 2010, Icarus, 207, 491 Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Willacy, K., Bodenheimer, P., Turner, N. J., & Beichman, C. A. 2009, Icarus, 200, 672 Dullemond, C. P., & Dominik, C. 2004, A&A, 421, 1075 Dunham, M. M., & Vorobyov, E. I. 2012, ApJ, 747, 52 France, K., Schindhelm, E., Bergin, E. A., Roueff, E., & Abgrall, H. 2014, ApJ, 784, 127 Fromang, S., & Nelson, R. P. 2006, A&A, 457, 343 Garaud, P., Meru, F., Galvagni, M., & Olczak, C. 2013, ApJ, 764, 146 Garmire, G., Feigelson, E. D., Broos, P., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1426 Garrod, R. T., & Pauly, T. 2011, ApJ, 735, 15 Graedel, T. E., Langer, W. D., & Frerking, M. A. 1982, ApJS, 48, 321 Grevesse, N., & Sauval, A. J. 1998, SSRv, 85, 161 Guilloteau, S., Dutrey, A., Pi´etu, V., & Boehler, Y. 2011, A&A, 529, A105 Habing, H. J. 1968, BAN, 19, 421 Henning, T., & Stognienko, R. 1996, A&A, 311, 291 Hollenbach, D., Kaufman, M. J., Bergin, E. A., & Melnick, G. J. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1497 Igea, J., & Glassgold, A. E. 1999, ApJ, 518, 848 Isella, A., Carpenter, J. M., & Sargent, A. I. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1746 Kraus, A. L., & Ireland, M. J. 2012, ApJ, 745, 5 Landry, R., Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Turner, N. J., & Abram, G. 2013, ApJ, 771, 80 Langer, W. D., & Penzias, A. A. 1993, ApJ, 408, 539 Lee, H.-H., Herbst, E., Pineau des Forets, G., Roueff, E., & Le Bourlot, J. 1996, A&A, 311, 690 Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425 Miotello, A., Bruderer, S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2014, A&A, 572, A96 Oberg, K. I., Boogert, A. C. A., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2011a, ApJ, 740, 109 Oberg, K. I., Murray-Clay, R., & Bergin, E. A. 2011b, ApJL, 743, L16 Oliveira, I., Pontoppidan, K. M., Mer´ın, B., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 778 P´erez, L. M., Carpenter, J. M., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2012, ApJL, 760, L17 P´erez, L. M., Chandler, C. J., Isella, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 813, 41 Piso, A.-M. A., Oberg, K. I., Birnstiel, T., & Murray-Clay, R. A. 2015, ApJ, 815, 109 Pollack, J. B., McKay, C. P., & Christofferson, B. M. 1985, Icarus, 64, 471 Qi, C., D'Alessio, P., Oberg, K. I., et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, 84 Qi, C., Oberg, K. I., & Wilner, D. J. 2013, ApJ, 765, 34 Robrade, J., Gudel, M., Gunther, H. M., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 2014, A&A, 561, A124 Semenov, D., Henning, T., Helling, C., Ilgner, M., & Sedlmayr, Gredel, R., Lepp, S., Dalgarno, A., & Herbst, E. 1989, ApJ, 347, E. 2003, A&A, 410, 611 289 Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337 14 Simon, J. B., Armitage, P. J., & Beckwith, K. 2011, ApJ, 743, 17 Smith, R. L., Pontoppidan, K. M., Young, E. D., Morris, M. R., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ApJ, 701, 163 Tazzari, M., Testi, L., Ercolano, B., et al. 2015, ArXiv e-prints, Umebayashi, T., & Nakano, T. 1981, PASJ, 33, 617 -- . 2009, ApJ, 690, 69 van Dishoeck, E. F., & Black, J. H. 1988, ApJ, 334, 771 Visser, R., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Black, J. H. 2009, A&A, 503, arXiv:1512.05679 323 Telleschi, A., Gudel, M., Briggs, K. R., Audard, M., & Scelsi, L. 2007, A&A, 468, 443 Williams, J. P., & Cieza, L. A. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 67 Woodall, J., Ag´undez, M., Markwick-Kemper, A. J., & Millar, Thommes, E. W., Duncan, M. J., & Levison, H. F. 2002, AJ, T. J. 2007, A&A, 466, 1197 123, 2862 Woods, P. M., & Willacy, K. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1360 Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. 2005, Nature, 435, 459 15 Table 1. A summary of parameters and definitions of variables Symbol ISRF COM MRI Stellar mass Disk mass nH2 fH Abundance A(B) T Teq Tacc ζabs ζsca LX,29 Σcr ζcr - Definition or Value Interstellar radiation field 1ISRF = 1.6 × 10−3ergs−1cm−2 for the ionizing UV radiation Complex organic molecules Magneto-rotational instability 0.95 M(cid:12), we follow the stellar evolution from 0.1 Myr (T(cid:63) = 4600K, and R(cid:63) = 5.5 R(cid:12)), to 3 Myr (T(cid:63) = 4500K, and R(cid:63) = 1.5 R(cid:12)). 0.015 M(cid:12) within 70 AU from the central star number density of hydrogen molecules 0.735, mass fraction of hydrogen number density with respect to the number density of hydrogen nuclei (nH + 2nH2 ). A(B) stands for A×10B disk temperature (same for dust and gas) equilibrium temperature contributed by stellar irradiation accretion temperature contributed by the MRI turbulence 6 × 10−12 s−1, ionization rate for direct x-ray absorption 10−15 s−1, ionization rate for scattered x-ray photons 20, stellar X-ray luminosity in units of 1029 ergs−1 96 gcm−2, characteristic column density of attenuation for cosmic rays cosmic ray ionization rate, 1.2 × 10−17 s−1 for H2 molecules when calculating the reactions lead by cosmic ray induced photons, the total ionization rate is taken as 1.3 × 10−17 s−1. Table 2. Input abundances of the molecular cloud model Species Abundance 1,2 H C+ O 17O Si+ 1.00 (-2) 7.21 (-5) 1.76 (-4) 7.64 (-8) 3.00 (-9) Element Abundance He 13C+ 18O N 1.40 (-1) 9.34 (-7) 3.51 (-7) 2.14 (-5) 1 Number density with respect to the number density of hydrogen nuclei (nH + 2nH2 ). The abundances are taken from Graedel et al. (1982). 2 A(B) stands for A×10B 16 Table 3. Binding energies and ice locations for carbon-bearing molecules Species H2O CO2 CO CH4 Species CH3 CH3OH C2H2 C2H3 C2H4 C2H5 C2H6 H2CCO CH3CHO H2CO Binding Energy (K) 1,2 Ice line (100 yr) 3 Ice line (3 Myr) 3 5.77 (3) 2.86 (3) 8.55 (2) 1.08 (3) 1.5 AU 18 AU > 70 AU > 70 AU 1 AU 2 AU > 70 AU > 70 AU Binding Energy (K) Ice location (3 Myr) 4 1.16 (3) 4.23 (3) 2.40 (3) 1.76 (3) 2.01 (3) 2.11 (3) 2.32 (3) 2.52 (3) 2.87 (3) 1.76 (3) r= 5 − 20AU, z=0.2 − 2AU, and r> 40AU 2 − 25 AU surface > 40AU most of the disk 5 − 45AU r= 8 − 25AU, z= 0.5 − 2.5AU 1 Binding energy is cited in energy (E in erg) divided by Boltzmann's constant (kB in erg/K) for easy interpretation, therefore has a unit of Kelvin. 2 A(B) stands for A×10B 3 The ice line (condensation front) location on the disk midplane. 4 For CH3OH, C2H2, C2H5, H2CCO, and CH3CHO, we mark the location where we see certain ice species, which de- pend on both the condensation temperature and the ability to form the molecule. The change of abundance can be very gradual. Here we quote the boundary location where 10% of carbon is stored in corresponding species. We are only showing results for the end of evolution (3 Myr) because those molecules are not formed until about 1 Myr into the disk evolution. Table 4. Abundances at the end of the cloud phase c2d fraction 2 MC abundance 3 Ice species MC fraction 1 H2O CO2 CH4 CO Gas species CO 100 35 24 15 100 28 5 29 NA 5 9.1(−5) 3.2(−5) 2.2(−5) 1.3(−5) c2d abundance 4 9.1(−5) 2.7(−5) 4.6(−6) 2.7(−5) 1.9(−6) 1.9(−6) 1 Fractional abundances in our molecular cloud model, normalized to the H2O ice abundance. 2 Fractional abundances in the c2d result, normalized to the H2O ice abundance. 3 Output abundances in our molecular cloud model. 4 Abundances scaled according to the c2d result, using the H2O abundance as the reference. 5 Oberg et al. (2011a) does not include gaseous species. 17 Table 5. Output abundances from different models Ice CO2 CH3OH CH3CHO H2CCO 4 C2Hx COM 5 Gas CO CH4 Standard1 Low H2CCO2 36.2 8.1 3.9 15.2 16.1 44.8 13.6 1.6 37.6 7.4 4.4 0.0 25.9 39.4 17.3 1.7 c2d3 31.0 24.6 5.6 3.4 3.1 37.0 18.3 0.2 evolving D/G 38.4 10.1 3.01 9.0 21.0 45.0 11.8 1.9 1 Model with original reaction rates and the input from our cloud model abundances. The percentage of total available carbon contained in each species is shown in the table. All the results are values integrated over the entire disk at the end of our modeled disk evolution at 3 Myr. 2 Model with small H2CCO formation rates and the input from our cloud model abundances. 3 Model with original reaction rates and the input adjusted to the c2d fractional abundances. See Table 4 for details. 4 Hydrocarbons that contain two carbon atoms. 5 The total abundance of complex organic molecules, including CH4, CH3OH, H2CCO, CH3CHO, and C2Hx. 18 Figure 1. Workflow of our disk model Blue boxes show three major components of our disk model. Green boxes show the model inputs taken directly from the literature, and yellow boxes are showing intermediate results computed in our study. Quantities in boxes with black borders evolve as a function of time, and the quantities in boxes without borders do not change over time. The arrows and variables next to the arrows are showing how information is passed between different model components. 19 Reaction Rate: UMISTInput: MC abundances UV, Xrays, Cosmic RaysDensity TempAtomic AbundanceMolecular AbundanceLine Optical DepthsChemical Model1+1D MRIThermodynamical ModelRADMC2D Opacity𝞺𝞺𝞺, TaccTeqStellar Evolution (R, T)Figure 2. Opacity as a function of wavelength for the 5-layer multishell grain model of Semenov et al. (2003). The grain temperature used for this plot is 155 K. 20 Figure 3. Upper left panel: Disk temperature (100yr) as a function of the radial distance to the central star (R) and height above the disk midplane (Z); Upper right panel: Disk temperature (3Myr); Lower left panel: Accretion heating (Tacc) contributed by the MRI turbulence (3Myr); The patches on the three color coded plots are interpolation artifacts, although the "arc" of light blue at ∼ 1AU above the midplane going from 5 − 30 AU is real heating due to the MRI turbulence. Lower right panel: A comparison of the midplane temperature (Teq only) computed by RADMC and the 1+1D model with Rosseland mean opacities (3Myr). The 1 + 1D model does not capture the heating contributed by longer wavelength radiation and underestimates the disk temperature in the inner 20AU. This effect is more severe at smaller radius due to larger optical depth, resulting in a lower temperature at smaller radius on the disk midplane - even though its surface temperature is higher. 21 010203040506070R (AU)0246810121416Z (AU)Accretion Heating (K) (3 Myr)0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.00246810R (AU)0.00.51.0Z (AU)010203040506070R (AU)020406080100120140Z (AU)Midplane Temperature (K)(3 Myr)1+1D Rosseland MeanRADMCFigure 4. Estimated ionization rates contributed by various mechanisms at the end of our disk evolution. Upper left panel: UV ionization rate (an order of magnitude estimation for the H2O molecule, the ionization rate in the disk interior is lower than 10−20s−1, and therefore does not show up in the plot.); Upper right panel: X-ray ionization; Lower left panel: cosmic ray ionization (an order of magnitude estimation considering only the H2 molecule); Lower right panel: fraction contributed by X-ray ionization. X-ray ionization dominates at z/r > 0.1, and cosmic rays account for most of the ionization for z/r < 0.1, where the UV and X-ray radiation from the central star are sufficiently attenuated. 22 Figure 5. Fractional abundances at the end of the 3Myr evolution (the number density with respect to the number density of hydrogen nuclei, nH + 2nH2 ). The color scale is in logarithm. Upper left: CO exists in a large abundance for r< 15AU; Upper right: CO2 ice exists in most part of the disk where the temperature is low enough for it to stay on grain surfaces; Lower left: H2CCO (ketene) ice is the major carbon sink beyond 15 AU from the central star; Lower right: Other complicated organic molecules such as C2Hx, and CH3CHO (acetaldehyde) exist in a layer between 10 − 30 AU, closer to the disk surface. 23 Figure 6. Fractional abundances continued. The figure setup is the same as in Fig. 5. Upper left: C2H2 is abundant where the temperature is too high for any carbon-bearing ices to freeze out; Upper right and lower left: CH3OH and CH3CHO serve as the carbon sinks where the temperature is high enough to evaporate H2CCO (ketene) ice; Lower right: C2H5 is able to form where the temperature is low enough for C2H3 to stay on grain surface and hydrogenate. 24 Figure 7. Abundances of major carbon-bearing molecules as functions of time. Upper panel: 38 AU on the disk midplane; lower panel: 60 AU on the disk midplane. Points show the values of actual data points in our models. 25 0.00.51.01.52.02.53.00.00.51.01.52.0Time (Myr)Abundance(10−5)Time evolution of abundances (40AU, midplane)COCH4C2H2 iceH2CCO iceC2H5 iceCH3OH ice0.00.51.01.52.02.53.00.00.51.01.52.0Time (Myr)Abundance(10−5)Time evolution of abundances (60AU, midplane)COCH4C2H2 iceH2CCO iceC2H5 iceCH3OH iceFigure 8. Reaction network for major carbon-bearing species. The species with boxes drawn around them are sinks, and letter G denotes species that are frozen out on grain surfaces. Starting from the upper left side the the figure: (1) The dissociation of CO is initiated by He+; (2) The topmost pathway shows methanol formation in relatively hot regions of the disk, where H2CCO molecules are not able to stay on the the grain surface. (3) The blue lines represent processes that move carbon from C2H3 to GCH3CHO (acetaldehyde); (4) The green lines trace a path for removing carbon from ketene in warm parts of the disk; To summarize, C2H2 gas exists where the temperature is too high for icy carbon sinks to form. GCH3CHO and GCH3OH are the carbon sink in warm regions, GH2CCO in the majority part of the disk where the temperature is lower. 26 COC+C2H+He+HeOCH3CH4CH4C2H3+C2H2+HCO+C2H5+C2HC2H2e-e-freezeGC2HfreezeGC2H2GHGHGC2H3C2H3desorbfastGHGC2H4slowGHGC2H5CH3H2COfreezeGH2COGHGHGCH2OHGCH3OHH2CCOGH2CCOfreezeC+CH2CO+CH2COe-C2C2H5CH3CHOdesorbfreezeGCH3CHOOOC2H4+e-Figure 9. Upper left: CO/13CO ratio (all four plots are for the end of the 3 Myr evolution); Upper right: C/13C ratio in H2CCO ice; Lower left: CO/C17O ratio; Lower right: CO/C18O ratio. Unsuperscripted species denote the most common isotopologue. 27 Figure 10. Upper left panel: Optical depth of various CO isotopologues J = 1 → 0 (100 yr). Upper right panel: Optical depth of various CO isotopologues J = 1 → 0 (3 Myr). Lower left panel: Optical depth of C17O J = 1 → 0 (time evolution). The optical depth increases over time roughly in r < 20 AU due to the photodissociation of CO2 lead by cosmic ray-induced photons, and the optical depth at r > 20 AU decreases over time due to the formation of COMs. Lower right panel: Optical depth contributed by dust emission at the wavelength of various CO transitions. Dust emission should not contribute much to observed fluxes in low-order CO rotational emission lines beyond 10 AU. 28 Optical depth of CO J = 1-0 (100 yr)0102030R (AU)-4-2024Optical Depth (log10)CO13COC18OC17O13C18OOptical depth (J=1-0, 3Myr)0102030R (AU)-4-2024Optical Depth (log10)CO13COC18OC17O13C18OOptical depth of C17O (J=1-0)0102030R (AU)-3-2-101Optical Depth (log10)100 yr1000 yr0.1Myr1 Myr3 Myr010203040506070r (AU)−3−2−101Optical Depth (log10)Optical depth contributed by dust (3Myr)J = 1-02-13-24-35-46-5
0911.1369	1	0911	2009-11-06T23:08:28	Three-Body Capture of Irregular Satellites: Application to Jupiter	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We investigate a new theory of the origin of the irregular satellites of the giant planets: capture of one member of a ~100-km binary asteroid after tidal disruption. The energy loss from disruption is sufficient for capture, but it cannot deliver the bodies directly to the observed orbits of the irregular satellites. Instead, the long-lived capture orbits subsequently evolve inward due to interactions with a tenuous circumplanetary gas disk. We focus on the capture by Jupiter, which, due to its large mass, provides the most stringent test of our model. We investigate the possible fates of disrupted bodies, the differences between prograde and retrograde captures, and the effects of Callisto on captured objects. We make an impulse approximation and discuss how it allows us to generalize capture results from equal-mass binaries to binaries with arbitrary mass ratios. We find that at Jupiter, binaries offer an increase of a factor of ~10 in the capture rate of 100-km objects as compared to single bodies, for objects separated by tens of radii that approach the planet on relatively low-energy trajectories. These bodies are at risk of collision with Callisto, but may be preserved by gas drag if their pericenters are raised quickly enough. We conclude that our mechanism is as capable of producing large irregular satellites as previous suggestions, and it avoids several problems faced by alternative models.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	– 1 – Three-Body Capture of Irregular Satellites: Application to Jupiter Catherine Philpott1, Douglas P. Hamilton1, and Craig B. Agnor2 1 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2421 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] 2 Astronomy Unit, School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK E14NS E-mail: [email protected] Submitted to Icarus: October 19, 2009 9 0 0 2 v o N 6 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 9 6 3 1 . 1 1 9 0 : v i X r a – 2 – ABSTRACT We investigate a new theory of the origin of the irregular satellites of the giant planets: capture of one member of a ∼100-km binary asteroid after tidal disruption. The energy loss from disruption is sufficient for capture, but it can- not deliver the bodies directly to the observed orbits of the irregular satellites. Instead, the long-lived capture orbits subsequently evolve inward due to interac- tions with a tenuous circumplanetary gas disk. We focus on the capture by Jupiter, which, due to its large mass, provides the most stringent test of our model. We investigate the possible fates of disrupted bodies, the differences between prograde and retrograde captures, and the effects of Callisto on captured objects. We make an impulse approximation and discuss how it allows us to generalize capture results from equal-mass binaries to binaries with arbitrary mass ratios. We find that at Jupiter, binaries offer an increase of a factor of ∼10 in the capture rate of 100-km objects as compared to single bodies, for objects separated by tens of radii that approach the planet on relatively low-energy trajectories. These bodies are at risk of collision with Callisto, but may be preserved by gas drag if their pericenters are raised quickly enough. We conclude that our mecha- nism is as capable of producing large irregular satellites as previous suggestions, and it avoids several problems faced by alternative models. 1. Introduction 1.1. Previously suggested capture models With discoveries accelerating in the last decade, we now know of over 150 satellites orbiting the giant planets. About one-third of these are classified as regular, with nearly circular and planar orbits. It is thought that these satellites are formed by accretion in circumplanetary disks. The majority of the satellites, however, are irregular and follow distant, highly eccentric and inclined paths. It is widely believed that irregular satellites originated in heliocentric orbits and were later captured by their planets, but the details of how this occurred are still uncertain. At least seven different models have been proposed, involving dissipative forces, collisions, resonances, and three-body effects. Each model has its own strengths and weaknesses. In one long-standing theory, planetesimals are slowed as they punch through the gas disk surrounding a young, growing planet (Pollack et al., 1979). For this mechanism to be – 3 – efficient, the gas must be sufficiently dense to capture the planetesimals in one pass. This is problematic, however, because if the gas disk does not rarefy substantially in ∼100-1000 years, the orbits of the new satellites will decay inward, leading to collisions with the planet and its regular satellites. Furthermore, the atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune have only a few Earth-masses of hydrogen and helium at present, so their gas disks could not have been as extensive or long-lived as those of Jupiter and Saturn. A likely outcome of this model, then, is that satellite capture should have been different at Jupiter and Saturn than at Uranus and Neptune; however, current observational estimates suggest equal efficiencies (Jewitt & Sheppard, 2005). With a model similar to that of Pollack et al., ´Cuk & Burns (2004a) found that Jupiter's largest irregular satellite, Himalia, would evolve inward to its current orbit in 104 − 106 years. This tenuous gas, however, may make capture difficult. In another model, planetesimals are captured when the mass of the planet increases (Heppenheimer & Porco, 1977). This mass growth causes the planet's escape velocity to increase, rendering a previously free planetesimal bound to the planet. For this method to be effective, the planet's mass must increase substantially on ∼100-1000-year timescales. However, in most planet formation models (e.g. Pollack et al., 1996), giant planet growth is hypothesized to take place on timescales many orders of magnitude longer than required by this capture scenario. Furthermore, Uranus and Neptune's gas deficiency implies that their growth was of very short duration. Thus, our current understanding of planetary formation makes this model improbable. The observation that the four giant planets contain approximately the same number of irregular satellites (accounting for observational biases; Jewitt & Sheppard, 2005) has led to a renewal of interest in capture theories that do not depend strongly on the planet's formation process. In one such scenario, a planetesimal collides with a current satellite or another planetesimal in the vicinity of the planet, resulting in its capture (Colombo & Franklin, 1971). Though collisions were certainly more common in the early Solar System than they are today, if they resulted in enough energy loss to permit capture, they would likely also have catastrophically disrupted the bodies. Nevertheless, the fragments might then have become independent satellites. A fourth suggestion involves the possible instability in the orbits of the outer planets early in the Solar System (e.g., by a 2:1 resonance crossing between Jupiter and Saturn). Outlining the theory of the Nice model of Solar System evolution, Tsiganis et al. (2005) have shown that such an event could cause Uranus and Neptune to have many close approaches with each other and with Jupiter and Saturn. During these encounters, the influence of the massive interloping planet can cause planetesimals to be stabilized as satellites (Nesvorn´y et al., 2007). This method is promising but has an important disadvantage in that Jupiter – 4 – (and Saturn, to a lesser extent) sustains very few close encounters relative to the ice giants. Thus the gas giants are inefficient at capturing satellites in this way (Nesvorn´y et al., 2007). Astakhov et al. (2003) examined low-energy orbits that linger near Jupiter and Saturn. While these bodies are not permanently captured, the authors found that some of them were stable for thousands of years, long enough to allow a weak dissipative force such as gas drag to complete the capture process. However, the overall percentage of temporary captures that do not escape is small, and many of these bodies are threatened by collision with the planets' large outer satellites (e.g., Callisto and Titan). Agnor & Hamilton (2006a) examined the capture of Triton from an exchange reaction between a binary pair and Neptune. Their motivation stemmed from the newly-discovered abundance of binaries in small-body populations. Currently, it is estimated that binaries account for ∼30% of Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) with inclinations < 5◦, ∼5% of the rest of the KBOs (Noll et al., 2008), and ∼2% of large main belt asteroids (diameters > 20 km; percentage increases for smaller objects; Merline et al., 2007). In Agnor & Hamilton's capture model, a binary is tidally disrupted and one of its members, Triton, is captured as a satellite. This process is most effective for large satellites like Triton, with radius 1350 km. However, the largest of the other irregular satellites are more than 10 times smaller than Triton: Himalia at Jupiter is ∼85 km in radius, Saturn's largest irregular, Phoebe, is ∼110 km, Uranus's Sycorax is ∼80 km, and Neptune's Halimede and Neso are only ∼30 km each. Capturing these satellites via binary exchange reactions would be significantly more difficult, as we will discuss further below. Finally, Vokrouhlick´y et al. (2008) examined binary exchange reactions during the first 100 Myr after an assumed Jupiter/Saturn 2:1 resonance crossing, using results of the Nice model (Tsiganis et al., 2005) to guide their initial conditions. Because planetesimal speeds relative to the planets are high after the scattering phase of the Nice model, they found that captures from binaries during that time do not match current orbital parameters and occur too infrequently to account for today's populations. 1.2. Our model: Capture from 100-km binaries All of the above models have promising aspects coupled with important limitations. In this work, we seek to combine the best features of several models into a viable capture sce- nario. In particular, we examine binaries (as in Agnor & Hamilton, 2006a and Vokrouhlick´y et al., 2008) as a way to augment capture from low-velocity orbits resulting from three-body interactions like those studied by Astakhov et al. (2003). While Vokrouhlick´y et al. (2008) – 5 – studied exchange reactions in the context of an assumed initial planetesimal population, we focus on assessing the viability of the mechanism itself. Our goal is to determine how various parameters of the model affect its plausibility. We examine its viability at Jupiter, as a number of the above models suggest that capturing at the largest gas giant is especially difficult. As the largest of the existing irregular satellites are ∼80-110 km, capture of objects in this size-range is particularly interesting. Since it is likely that the irregular satellite population contains collisional families (Nesvorn´y et al., 2003; Sheppard & Jewitt, 2003), it may be the case that only the largest objects were captured, while the smaller satellites formed later, via collisions. For this reason, we focus our investigation on capturing the ∼100-km progenitors. In order to stabilize and shrink the resulting capture orbits, a dissipation source is required; we suggest a tenuous version of the gas drag originally proposed by Pollack et al. (1979). Two of Jupiter's irregular satellites, Pasiphae and Sinope, as well as Saturn's satellite, Siarnaq, and Uranus' Stephano, are found in resonances that seem to require just such a weak dissipative force (Whipple & Shelus, 1993; Saha & Tremaine, 1993; ´Cuk & Burns, 2004b). Furthermore, a tenuous circumplanetary disk is consistent with current theories of late- stage planetary formation. Jupiter's massive gaseous envelope of hydrogen and helium ne- cessitates that it formed in the Solar System's circumstellar gas disk. Before the end of its accretion, Jupiter was likely able to open a gap in the local density distribution of the gas (for a review, see e.g. Papaloizou et al., 2008). After gap opening, gas continues to leak into the planet's Hill sphere through the L1 and L2 points, but at a rate much reduced in comparison to the previous epochs. A tenuous circumplanetary gas disk results (e.g., Lubow et al., 1999; D'Angelo et al., 2003; Bate et al., 2003), from which material may condense and regular satellites may accrete near the planet (e.g., Canup & Ward, 2002; Mosquiera & Estrada, 2003). In ´Cuk & Burns' study (2004a) of the Himalia progenitor's orbital evolution, they considered circumjovian nebular conditions consistent with hydrodynamical simulations of Jupiter's gap opening in a circumstellar gas disk (e.g., Lubow et al., 1999) and found that the post-capture timescale for evolving this progenitor to its present orbit to be roughly in the range of 104−106 years. This is similar to the timescale in which extrasolar circumstellar disks transition from optically thick to thin (∼ 105 years; Skrutskie et al., 1990; Silverstone et al., 2006; Cieza et al., 2007). The similarity of timescales suggests that satellites captured at the onset of disk dispersal have a good chance of experiencing stabilizing orbital evolution while also avoiding collision with the planet. – 6 – The timescale for binary capture is very short compared to evolution timescales from a tenuous gas disk. Therefore, we focus our study first on characterizing the effectiveness of binary capture in the absence of gas. In the following sections, we critically evaluate our model for capturing irregular satellites from low-mass (∼100-km) binaries. We begin with a closer examination of the three-body capture process and then explore parameter space with a large suite of numerical simulations. We then discuss the ability of gas drag to stabilize post-capture orbits in Section 4.7. 2. Three-body capture process Binary capture first requires a close approach between a binary pair and a planet. As the pair approaches the planet on a hyperbolic trajectory, its two components also orbit their mutual center of mass (CM). Hence, each member's speed with respect to the planet is a vector sum of its CM speed (vCM ) and its orbital speed around the CM. If the binary passes close enough to the planet, it will be tidally disrupted. Following Agnor & Hamilton (2006a), we make an 'impulse approximation' and assume that disruption is instantaneous, so that the distance at which tidal disruption occurs (rtd) can be estimated as: rtd ≈ aB(cid:18) 3MP m1 + m2(cid:19)1/3 , (1) where aB is the semi-major axis of the binary, MP is the mass of the planet, and m1 and m2 are the masses of the binary pair. This tidal disruption radius is the distance to the planet at which the binary's Hill sphere is no longer larger than the binary itself. As a result of the impulse approximation, we also assume the orbits of the now-separated components are dictated by their speeds upon disruption. The speed change of one compo- nent (∆v1) is approximately equal to its orbital speed around the CM: ∆v1 ≈ ± m2 m1 + m2 (cid:18)G(m1 + m2) aB (cid:19)1/2 , (2) where G is the gravitational constant. If the speed of either component is below the escape speed (vesc) when the binary is split, that component will be captured. This is most efficient if the incoming vCM is only slightly faster than the value needed for escape. (See Fig. 1.) The separation of the binary (rB = 2aB, for equal-mass pairs on circular orbits) plays a key role in determining whether a given encounter will result in a capture. From Eq. 2, we – 7 – can see that a smaller separation imparts a higher speed change upon disruption, increasing the probability of capture. However, the separation must be large enough that the binary can actually be disrupted. Equation 1 indicates that, not surprisingly, a large separation makes the binary easier to split. The separation that optimizes capture, then, is one just wide enough that the binary is disrupted. In addition, the tidal radius is important: the speed change needed for capture (vCM − vesc, the difference between the two horizontal lines in Fig 1) decreases for smaller rtd. Thus deeper encounters are more likely to lead to captures. In much of the current work, we consider the simplified case where Jupiter orbits the Sun along a circle. In this case, the Jacobi constant (CJ ) for the planet-Sun-interloper three- body problem is a very useful predictor of the interloper's potential for capture, taking on the role of v∞ from the two-body approximation. Although our model contains four bodies, and the Jacobi constant is a three-body construct, it is an excellent approximation to consider the CM of the binary as one body moving in the Sun-Jupiter system up until the point of disruption. The gravitational energy between the binary components is negligible after they separate. Thus after disruption, we essentially have two separate three-body problems, one for each binary component, and we can make use of the Jacobi constant throughout the entire simulation. If CJ ≥ CJ,crit, the critical value for capture, bodies in the vicinity of the planet are bound by so-called zero-velocity curves (ZVCs) that enclose Jupiter and constrain particle motions (Fig. 2). For Jacobi constants lower than CJ,crit (i.e., higher energies), one large zero- velocity curve surrounds both Jupiter and the Sun and bodies can enter and exit Jupiter's Hill sphere freely. The critical Jacobi constant represents the boundary between these pos- sibilities. Murray & Dermott (1999) give its value: CJ,crit ≈ 3 + 34/3µ2/3 − 10µ/3, where µ = MP and M⊙ and MP are the masses of the Sun and the planet, respectively. Here we use dimensionless units in which G, the Jupiter-Sun distance, and the sum of the solar and jovian masses are equal to 1. For the Jupiter-Sun system, which is the focus of the current paper, µ = 9.53 ×10−4 and CJ,crit ≈ 3.0387. M⊙+MP Figure 3 illustrates a typical capture involving Jupiter. In the bottom panel, the Jacobi constant of the binary pair prior to its split is lower than the critical value, meaning that initially, the binary has too much energy to be bound. The oscillations in the bodies' pre- disruption CJ are due to gravitational interactions between the binary components. At the time of disruption (t ≈ 8 yr), one component sharply gains energy (CJ decreases), while the other component experiences a corresponding energy loss (CJ increases). In this example, one component's final CJ is higher than the critical value, signifying that it is permanently bound to Jupiter. Though the Jacobi constant is very valuable when considering a circularly-orbiting Jupiter, a disadvantage is that it cannot be extended to cases with non- – 8 – zero eccentricity. In this paper, we make the simplifying assumption that eJ = 0 (rather than the true value of ∼0.048) in order to better elucidate important physics of the problem. In Fig. 4, we plot the orbits of the binary components shown in Fig. 3. Low-velocity orbits like these are characterized by multiple close passes by the planet (cf. Hamilton & Burns, 1991). The separation is disturbed by the strong tidal force during each of these passes, but the binary splits only after it comes within the tidal disruption radius (see top and middle panels of Fig. 3). The binary capture mechanism is most effective at producing permanent or long-lived captures if i) the mutual orbital speed of the binary is high, and/or ii) the encounter speed is low. Agnor & Hamilton's (2006a) work examined Neptune's moon Triton, which is somewhat of a special case because it fulfills both of these criteria – its size means that its orbital speed around a close companion would be high, and typical encounter speeds at Neptune in the early stages of planet formation are relatively low. The direct three-body capture mechanism is much less effective for most other irregular satellites which are ∼100 km or smaller in radius. Furthermore, because of Jupiter and Saturn's sizes and proximity to the Sun, encounter speeds at the semi-major axes of the gas giants' irregular satellites are relatively fast, vCM ≈ 3 km/s. To produce a large enough energy change for capturing directly to the current satellites' locations, binary components must be orbiting each other at speeds comparable to their encounter speeds. This would require binary companions of order Mars- or Earth-sized (Agnor & Hamilton, 2006b) – an uncommon occurrence even in the early Solar System. Accordingly, in this work, we relax the requirement that moons are captured directly to their present orbits. In the example discussed above (see Fig. 4), the final orbit of the captured satellite extends almost to the Hill radius (rH ), whereas the actual satellites at Jupiter are significantly more tightly bound. We investigate the idea that the objects were first captured to these distant orbits, and a subsequent period of orbital evolution (e.g., by weak gas drag) led them to their current configurations. The post-capture evolution is a key component in our model because it allows for capture from small binary pairs, even though they deliver satellites to very distant orbits. Binaries with primaries of order 100 km were certainly much more numerous than those with planet- sized primaries, even in the early Solar System. Models that rely on gas drag for capture (e.g. Pollack et al., 1979) require both i) dense gas (to enable capture) and ii) rapid dispersal (to prevent satellite loss to the planet). By contrast, our model requires no gas for capture and puts only weak constraints on gas required for orbital evolution. In particular, we require only that the product of the gas density and its residence time around Jupiter be large enough that the requisite amount of evolution can occur. – 9 – 3. Numerical model The goal of this work is to characterize the overall effect of binaries on the probability of capturing bodies on planet-crossing paths. We focus primarily on captures at Jupiter, which has the most irregular satellites and has many sources of small bodies nearby. Also, as discussed above, capture at Jupiter has shown to be difficult, especially because of its large size and fast encounter speeds for approaching bodies. Thus these simulations provide the most stringent test of our model. Our integrations include the Sun, Jupiter, and a binary or single object, in a planet- centered frame. In order to examine binaries' effectiveness at producing long-lived captures, we compare them to captures of single-body interlopers. While only tidally disrupted binaries can be captured permanently, unbound single bodies can remain near the planet for long periods of time (e.g. Astakhov et al., 2003). We define a 'capture' to be a body that remains near Jupiter for 1,000 years, the duration of each simulation. Furthermore, we define 'binary capture' to mean capture of one or both of the bodies that originated together as binary components. Note that these definitions encompass both permanent (energetically bound) and long-lived temporary captures. With captures of single bodies as a baseline, we are able to measure the enhancement due to binaries. Our simulations are performed with HNBody, a hierarchical N-body integration package, and HNDrag, a companion code for applying non-gravitational forces to the particles and for detecting close approaches (Rauch & Hamilton, 2002). For most of this work, we use only the close-approach detecting capabilities of HNDrag and include only gravitational forces. We use HNBody's Bulirsch-Stoer integrator with a specified accuracy of one part in 1014. The adaptive-stepsize Bulirsch-Stoer integrator is much more efficient than a symplectic integrator here because while a small stepsize is needed initially to resolve the orbital motion around the binary CM, it can be greatly increased after disruption. We ran about 200 sets of three- or four-body simulations examining a range of Jacobi constants for each interloper (2.95-3.037), as well as varying the binaries' radii (65-, 100-, and 125-km), and separations (1-1000 body radii). For each set of parameters, we generated 10,000 binaries or single objects, for a total of ∼2×106 simulations, each following the bodies for 1,000 years. We started all of the interlopers of a given set at the same distance from the planet, ranging from 1.0 - 1.4 rH. (Section 4.4 contains a discussion of the effects of starting distances on capture statistics.) The choice of Jacobi constant and starting distance – 10 – constrains the possible initial positions of the binary CM. Fig. 2 shows Jupiter's Hill sphere overplotted with ZVCs corresponding to the Jacobi constants that we studied. Bodies are energetically unable to cross their zero-velocity surfaces, and thus starting with, say, CJ = 3.037 at 1.0 rH from the planet restricts the body's initial position to the two small 'endcaps' of the Hill sphere along the Jupiter-Sun line. For smaller CJ , these allowed areas are larger and finally encompass the entire Hill sphere for CJ .3.025. The bodies' initial speeds are also constrained by the specified Jacobi constant, and we choose the velocity to point in random inward directions. For simplicity, we set the binary components to orbit each other on circles and the binary angular momentum to be perpendicular to Jupiter's equatorial plane. We ran each initial condition with five different binary orbital phases (equally-spaced mean anomalies) and averaged all capture statistics over the five phases. Throughout the simulations, we monitored the bodies, weeding out very close approaches between any two objects and noting each body's close approaches to Jupiter. (Collisions between binary members do occur, but these are rare and of limited interest, since the merged object simply behaves as a single interloper with the same CM speed.) To shorten the computational time required, we stopped integrations in which all of the incoming objects traveled further than 2-5 Hill radii from Jupiter, depending on the bodies' starting distance from the planet. 4. Results 4.1. Relationship between inclination and CJ In our simulations, we find that the inclination of the approach trajectory is correlated with the initial Jacobi constant, which is helpful in providing physical intuition for the meaning of CJ. This correlation was first noticed numerically by Astakhov et al. (2003); here we confirm their finding numerically and provide an analytical explanation. Fig. 5 displays this CJ -inclination relationship. We see a clear correlation of CJ with mean inclination: lower Jacobi constants are indicative of retrograde orbits, while prograde orbits have larger CJ . For clarity, the plot shows only a representative population of bodies: 100-km binary members that result in a capture, with inclinations calculated at the closest approach of each body's first pass by Jupiter. However, the relationship holds for all close approaches of binaries or single objects, captured or not. This plot provokes two main questions: what is the physical cause of this trend and why is there such high scatter in inclination at a given Jacobi constant? We address the question of scatter first. One complexity in making this plot is that all orbital elements including inclination are – 11 – poorly defined at large distances from Jupiter, as solar tides are comparable to Jupiter's gravity at the Hill sphere. Accordingly, we were careful to calculate the inclinations only at orbital pericenter where solar tides are weakest so that inclination is always well defined. Poorly-defined orbital elements, therefore, are not the source of the scatter. Furthermore, the variations look nearly the same when we plot single objects rather than binaries, which is expected since disrupting the binary results in an energy change that only slightly alters CJ (e.g., Fig. 3). Finally, the scatter is present even when we consider one individual object's multiple pericenter passages rather than those of an ensemble of objects. Thus the spread in inclination is real and is due to the response of a single captured object to the solar tidal force. The scatter in inclination as well as the inclination-CJ trend can be understood analyt- ically by writing the Jacobi contant in terms of planetocentric orbital elements rather than the heliocentric orbital elements used in deriving the standard Tisserand constant (Murray & Dermott, 1999). We begin with the planet-centered 'generalized Tisserand constant' de- rived in Hamilton & Krivov, 1997 (their Eq. 4) and neglect the solar tidal term since it is complicated and unimportant at pericenter where we measure inclination. We then non- dimensionalize the equation as described in Section 2, and finally, to conform to standard usage (Murray & Dermott, 1999), we add the constant 3 to the final result and find: CJ ′ = 3 + 31/3µ2/3 ¯a "1 + 2(cid:18) ¯a3(1 − e2) 3 (cid:19)1/2 cos(i)# , (3) where µ is the mass ratio as defined above; ¯a = a/rH; and a, e, and i are the captured satel- lite's semi-major axis, eccentricity, and inclination, respectively. Because we have neglected the solar tidal term and used planetocentric orbital elements, this expression is valid only near the planet where solar perturbations are weak. For close orbits of the planet (¯a << rH), orbit-averaging the effects of the tidal force shows that the semimajor axis ¯a remains constant. Accordingly, Eq. 3 leads directly to the Kozai constant, K = √1 − e2 cos(i). This constant explains the coupled oscillations in eccentricity and inclination that characterize the Kozai resonance. If K were precisely conserved, orbits would not be able to switch between i < 90◦ (which have K > 0) and i > 90◦ (which have K < 0). We do, however, see such prograde-to-retrograde transfers in Fig. 5, which indicates that, as expected, K (and therefore ¯a) is not constant for our distant orbits (see, e.g., Hamilton & Burns, 1991). In addition, at apocenter where the solar tidal force is strongest, the orbital elements themselves are poorly defined and Eq. 3 is only approximate. Thus between each pericenter passage, the orbital elements (including inclination) are scrambled by the solar tidal force leading to dispersion like that seen in – 12 – Fig. 5. The trend observed in Fig. 5, decreasing inclination for increasing Jacobi constant, is neatly explained by Eq. 3. Testing the equation quantitatively, we estimate ¯a = 0.5 and e = 0.7 for a typical orbit of a body captured at Jupiter (e.g., Fig. 4). A purely prograde orbit ′ = 3.020. These (i = 0) gives CJ values roughly correspond to the range of Jacobi constants seen in Fig. 5, despite the rather large approximations that we have made. The inclination-CJ correlation is strong enough that we will often use the term prograde to refer to orbits with CJ ∼ 3.03, and retrograde to mean CJ ∼ 3.01. ′ = 3.036, while a purely retrograde orbit (i = 180◦) gives CJ 4.2. Modes of capture For each binary-planet encounter, there are four possible outcomes: (1) neither com- ponent captures (hereafter known as '0C'), (2) one component captures ('1C'), (3) both components capture together as an intact binary without splitting apart ('2C-BIN'), or (4) the binary is disrupted and both components capture individually ('2C-IND'). The frequency of each type of outcome depends on the characteristics of the binary. Fig. 6 shows the out- comes that result in a capture (i.e., 1C, 2C-BIN, and 2C-IND) for 65-km binary pairs with initial CJ = 3.037, as a function of the initial separation, rB, of the binary. The separation can be altered significantly prior to disruption during close approaches to the planet. The number of captures for a set of single objects is also plotted for comparison; these must be temporary captures since there is no energy loss. The rate of 2C-BIN captures is largest when the separation is small (and thus the com- ponents are tightly bound to each other). For small-enough separations, the tidal disruption radius is so close to the planet that very few binary orbits cross it (see Eq. 1). Here, most of the binaries remain intact, and the 2C-BIN rate nearly matches that of single objects. When we increase the binary separation, more binaries are split, and the 2C-BIN capture percentage monotonically drops to zero, as expected. Disrupting binaries leads to more possibilities for capture of individual objects. Accord- ingly, as the separation increases, the 1C and 2C-IND capture rates rises from zero. For the 1C population of 65-km objects with CJ = 3.037, there is a peak in capture efficiency of ∼5 times that of a single body at a separation of ∼20 body radii (RB). This separation represents the optimal balance between disrupting a high percentage of the binaries and de- livering the most energy upon disruption. The optimum separation varies depending on the mass of the binary. At larger separations, the binding energy decreases, leading to smaller – 13 – energy kicks and a diminished capture rate. The 2C-IND percentage has a peak at the same separation as the 1C group. These binaries likely split during orbital phases where the energy is distributed almost equally between the components. The number of 2C-IND captures is never more than a few percent of the 1C captures, but the two populations peak at rB ∼ 20 RB for the same reasons. More widely separated binaries are disrupted with a smaller energy change. Because of this, the two components are more likely to have similar energies and post-disruption fates, causing an increase in 2C-IND captures at larger separations. Unlike the case for 1C and 2C-IND capture where energy is lost and capture can be long-lived or even permanent (as in Fig. 3), capture of singles or intact binaries (2C-BIN) is necessarily temporary. This could be an advantage for 1C captures, which have more stable, lower-energy initial capture orbits. The details of the final comparative satellite yields depend on the subsequent orbital evolution, which is determined by the gas present at the time of capture and its dissipation timescale. 4.3. Effects of binary mass and orbital separation Having explored the physical meaning of CJ and the possible types of captures, we now discuss the results of the numerical simulations. In this section, we consider cases of equal- mass binaries encountering Jupiter with the planet on a circular orbit, and we examine the effects of the bodies' masses, binary separations, and initial Jacobi constants. We performed integrations over a range of Jacobi constants: 2.95 ≤ CJ ≤ 3.037, where CJ ≈ 3.0387 is the critical value above which transfer orbits between Jupiter and the Sun are impossible (see Fig. 2). For CJ ≤ 2.99, no captures resulted for any of the parameters we tested, although capture at these low Jacobi constants could certainly occur for larger-mass binaries. For now, we consider the fate of bodies started from the Hill sphere (following Astakhov et al., 2003); in Section 4.4, we discuss the importance of alternative starting distances. We examined masses corresponding to pairs of objects each with radii 65-km, 100-km, and 125-km (assuming a density of ∼2 g/cm3). Fig. 7 displays the results of these mass studies. We see that capture rates increase for higher masses: the 125-km capture rate is slightly higher than the 100-km rate throughout the range of Jacobi constants, and they differ most significantly from 65-km binary pairs for CJ > 3.03. For single objects, mass has no effect on capture probability, but for binaries, larger total mass leads to more rapid orbital speeds and a higher speed change upon breakup. This can be seen by eliminating aB from Eqs. 1 and 2, with mass ratio ( m2 ) and tidal distance m1+m2 – 14 – (rtd) held constant; the result is ∆v1 ∼ (m1 + m2)1/3. Accordingly, larger masses generally lead to increased capture rates. Another important result is that capture rates from binaries are extremely sensitive to the binary's separation, rB = 2aB. For each of the masses we examined, we determined the optimum separation of the binary required to achieve the maximum capture probability. We used Eqs. 1 and 2 to guide our separation selection, and we integrated each point on Fig. 7 with several different binary separations to determine the optimal value. In Fig. 7, we have plotted statistics using a single separation for each mass over the range of Jacobi constants. For most of the Jacobi constants studied for a given mass, the optimal separations are very similar, ∼10 RB. An important exception is for the highest CJ value tested, 3.037 (recall that this corresponds to mostly prograde encounters – see Fig. 5), which had maximum captures at a larger separation (∼20 RB) than the typical optimal value. Because we have not plotted this optimal value in Fig. 7, the curve declines sharply at CJ = 3.037. As is clear from Section 4.2, optimizing the separation makes a significant difference in capture rate, especially for binaries whose CJ values are close to the capture threshold. Changing from ∼10 RB to the optimal 20 RB for CJ = 3.037 increases the capture percentage from ∼2% to ∼10% (100-125 km objects) and ∼1% to ∼3% (65-km, see Fig. 6). Binary capture rates also appear to depend strongly on initial Jacobi constant. It is tempting to compare capture efficiencies for low and high Jacobi constants (retrograde and prograde orbits). A direct comparison of these rates, however, cannot be made for reasons that will become apparent in the next section. We can, however, compare the binary statistics to those of single objects. The bodies that originate in binaries capture with similar rates as the single objects below CJ ≈ 3.015, but as CJ increases, the effects of the binaries become more visible, rising by an order of magnitude in efficiency at delivering objects to Jupiter. Part of the reason for this is probably that the retrograde binaries are harder to split than progrades because of their orientation to the planet. Another explanation, particularly for the highest initial Jacobi constants, is that these encounters are close to the critial energy barrier for capture, and so the energy change from disruption of the binary is more likely to result in capture. 4.4. Effects of starting distance 4.4.1. Contamination from bound retrograde orbits Thus far we have discussed results from initial conditions that launch objects from the Hill sphere. In the course of this study, we discovered that the choice of starting distance can – 15 – significantly affect the capture statistics. While the Hill sphere is defined as a rough stability boundary beyond which the Sun's gravitational influence is stronger than the planet's, in practice, stable retrograde orbits can extend out to distances slightly beyond the Hill radius (see, e.g., Hamilton & Burns, 1991). In contrast, stable prograde orbits (e.g., Fig. 4) are always well within the Hill sphere. Starting the integrations with bodies on the Hill sphere, then, risks starting on an already-stable retrograde orbit. This causes ambiguity in the capture statistics – which orbits were always near Jupiter and which truly came in from infinity? We demand that true captures originate in heliocentric orbit and transition to planet- centered orbits, remaining for at least 1,000 years. To differentiate between these and mis- leading 'captures' from bodies that are already orbiting the planet at the beginning of our integration, we took the single-body capture orbits and integrated the initial conditions back- wards in time for 1,000 years. We then separated the captures that came in from infinity and those that were always present near the planet. We found that when starting on the Hill sphere, most of the resulting retrograde captures of single objects at low CJ had always been orbiting the planet and were in fact not true captures. We examined several other launch distances and determined that starting from 1.1 Hill radii (rH) and beyond eliminates nearly all contamination from already-stable retrograde orbits. Figure 8 compares the capture rates for single objects beginning from 1.0 rH and 1.1 rH. We see that while the high-CJ captures are uncontaminated, launching from 1.0 rH for CJ < 3.03 leads to many false captures. In fact, over one-third of the 1.0 rH captures are contaminations. (This fraction is much smaller for binaries, where there are many more prograde captures than retrograde.) When the objects are launched from 1.1 rH , we see no artificial captures at all. Similar tests at 1.2 rH and 1.4 rH also show no false captures. Al- though stable orbits do exist to these and larger distances (Henon, 1969), they are apparently extremely rare. 4.4.2. Scaling to different starting distances So, is it safe to compare prograde and retrograde capture statistics for starting distances beyond 1.1 rH? Starting outside the Hill sphere results in a decrease in true captures over the full range of CJ (as seen in Fig. 8). This is expected, because fewer of these bodies experience close approaches with the planet. However, prograde captures are more drastically reduced than retrogrades. Determining the reason for this is critical to answering our question. At high Jacobi constants (& 3.03, which correspond to mostly prograde orbits), the – 16 – binary's ZVCs are closed around the planet except for only a small neck on either side of Jupiter, toward and away from the Sun (see Fig. 2). In contrast, lower Jacobi constants (and thus retrograde orbits) allow for more freedom of movement in the region between the Sun and Jupiter. Retrograde orbits can approach the planet from all directions, while progrades are limited to the entering via the narrow ZVC necks. Starting further than the Hill sphere means that a smaller fraction of the initial prograde trajectories pass through the zero-velocity necks and approach Jupiter, resulting in a decrease in captures. We tested the hypothesis that the shape of the prograde ZVCs is the primary reason for the decrease in prograde captures with the following procedure: 1) Determine the capture rate at 1.2 rH. 2) Determine the crossing rate of 1.2 rH orbits inside 1.1 rH. 3) Scale the 1.1 rH capture rate by the crossing rate from step (2). We use the statistics for 1.1 rH and 1.2 rH because they are free from any contamination from the false retrograde captures discussed above. The result of step (3) is what we expect the 1.2 rH capture percentages would be if the ZVC shapes are the reason for the decline in prograde captures from 1.1 rH to 1.2 rH. Comparing these scaled capture rates with the actual 1.2 rH percentages (as shown in Fig. 9), we see that this scaling accounts for most of the difference between the two capture rates, to within 20%. This indicates that our prediction is valid. In principle, these results also account for the reduction in true retrograde captures, but the number statistics are so low for retrogrades at these launch distances that the actual and scaled capture percentages are equivalent to within the error. We find, then, that because of the differing geometries of their ZVCs, we cannot directly compare prograde and retrograde statistics. This is true even when starting beyond the limit for already-stable retrograde orbits, chiefly because prograde orbits are so sensitive to their initial distance. To circumvent this effect, we would have to start far enough away from the planet that further increasing the starting distance would result in an equal fractional decrease in captures for retrogrades and progrades – in other words, where the geometry of the prograde ZVCs is no longer the dominant reason for the decrease. Our simulations, out to 1.4 rH , did not reach this threshold and were limited by number statistics. We anticipate that comparing prograde and retrograde captures would require starting still further from the planet than our trials, and would demand much larger initial populations. – 17 – 4.4.3. Starting from 1.1 rH vs. 1.0 rH Launching binaries from 1.1 rH rather than 1.0 rH results in an overall decrease in captures for the reasons described above, but many of the characteristics of the capture orbits remain relatively unchanged. For example, the inclination distribution for the 1.1 rH captures is almost identical to the 1.0 rH population plotted in Fig. 5. Also, comparing Fig. 9 with Fig. 7, we see that the trend in the capture percentage with CJ of the 100-km binaries at 1.1 rH and 1.0 rH are generally similar. Figure 10 displays the modes of capture vs. Jacobi constant for 100-km binaries and single objects starting from both 1.0 rH and 1.1 rH. Starting at 1.1 rH results in a depletion of 2C captures relative to 1C captures. This is because many of the retrograde 2C-IND and 2C-BIN captures were likely the artificial retrogrades which are eliminated when starting from 1.1 rH . The single captures also appear depleted relative to the other curves, but in fact, the binaries are diminished by a roughly comparable amount. Overall, there are few qualitative differences between the 1.0 rH and the 1.1 rH cases. We note that other groups (including Astakhov et al., 2003 and Astakhov & Farrelly, 2004) have initiated bodies from the Hill sphere without considering how this affects the resulting statistics, most notably that many of their retrograde encounters are started on already-stable orbits. For future studies of capture near Jupiter, we recommend the following procedure: 1) generate bodies starting from 1.0 rH , 2) integrate each body backwards in time, 3) eliminate those that remain near the planet when integrated backwards, and 4) integrate the remaining bodies in normal time direction. The benefits of this approach over simply starting from 1.1 rH are that it eliminates all stable-retrograde contamination while preserving high number statistics. Note, however, that this procedure still does not allow a valid comparison between prograde and retrograde statistics. To obtain the true ratio of captured progrades and retrogrades, it would probably be best to start the interlopers on heliocentric orbits. 4.5. Scaling to unequal binary masses The impulse approximation (Eqs. 1 and 2) implies that a binary component's likelihood of capture depends only on 1) the binary's tidal disruption radius and 2) the component's instantaneous speed at the time of disruption. Accordingly, for any mass ratio m1 : m2 and semi-major axis aB, we can find an equal-mass binary with the same rtd and the same component speeds as m1 and another equal-mass binary that matches these values for m2. Setting rtd and v equal for the two mass ratios, we solve for the component mass, m′, and – 18 – the semi-major axis, aB ′, of the equal-mass binary matching m1: and m′ = 3 4m2 (m1 + m2)2 aB ′ = aB(cid:18) 2m2 m1 + m2(cid:19) . (4) (5) The problem is symmetric, so for the equal-mass binary matching m2, we simply exchange m1 and m2 in the above equations. We tested these predictions for 3:2 and 4:1 mass ratios and display the results in Table 1. Each of the equal-mass components captures with the same efficiency (to within 10%) as either m1 or m2. This is strong validation of the impulse approximation. This sort of scaling requires, of course, that the binary be split and therefore applies only to our 1C and 2C-IND results. By contrast, undisrupted binaries (2C-BIN) behave as single objects and have a capture efficiency that is independent of mass. The impulse approximation allows us to make other predictions as well. For example, we can reverse the above scenario and predict the capture rates of two equal-mass binaries corresponding to one unequal-mass pair for which the capture rates of each component are known. Further, given the capture rate for a single equal-mass binary, we can predict the capture efficiency of one component of an unequal-mass pair, if one parameter of the unequal-mass binary (m1, m2, m1 + m2, or aB) is set. This means that each equal-mass pair matches to a whole family of unequal-mass binaries. Finally, we can extend these techniques to guide large-scale simulations. Using the im- pulse approximation, and given equal-mass capture statistics for all combinations of relevant masses and separations, we can predict the capture rates for all unequal-mass binaries – with any mass ratio, total mass, and separation. Similarly, knowledge of unequal-mass capture rates for one component of a binary with a fixed mass ratio allows us to estimate the capture efficiencies of all equal-mass binaries. Scaling with the impulse approximation is a powerful way to predict capture rates. Practically speaking, it means that capture of any unequal-mass binaries can be predicted by studying just equal-mass cases, and accordingly, we have restricted our numerical studies to binaries with equal masses. – 19 – 4.6. Jupiter's eccentricity Most scenarios, including our own, propose that irregular satellite capture occurred early in the Solar System's history (Section 1.1). It is likely that Jupiter's eccentricity was closer to zero at this time and its current value was obtained later. Thus we have chosen to use eJ = 0 in our simulations and believe it is a reasonable assumption. How would Jupiter's current eccentricity affect capture? It is not straightforward to extend this study to a non-zero jovian eccentricity for the primary reason that the Jacobi constant is no longer a constant of the motion. Though Jupiter's current eccentricity is small (eJ ∼ 0.048), it causes the calculated CJ of an interloper to vary by ∼0.2 over an orbit. This is a variation about ten times larger than our entire range of tested Jacobi constants. Thus we cannot simply assign an initial CJ to binaries or single objects approaching an eccentric Jupiter and compare the capture results with the equivalent circular case. Only for eccentricities less than a hundredth of Jupiter's would the errors introduced in the Jacobi constant be acceptable. The results of Astakhov & Farrelly (2004) suggest an order of magnitude lower capture probability for single objects in the eccentric case as compared to capture by a planet orbiting on a circle. However, their initial conditions were generated using the same Jacobi constant values in the eccentric and the non-eccentric cases. Because of the variation in CJ induced by eccentricity, their method actually produces a much larger range of Jacobi constants (and much higher approach speeds) for tests with an eccentric planet, and the results should not be directly compared with the circular case. We believe their conclusions give artificially low eccentric-case capture rates for this reason. We do not expect Jupiter's eccentricity to strongly affect capture. As the timescale for capture is much shorter than Jupiter's orbital period, the planet's instantaneous location is the most relevant factor. At pericenter, Jupiter's Hill sphere is slightly smaller than at its average distance from the Sun and encounter speeds are slightly higher, likely resulting in fewer captures. The opposite can be expected at apocenter, causing the effects of eccentricity to average out and probably produce little change in overall capture statistics. To truly know the effects of the planet's eccentricity would require large-scale integrations with the interlopers originating on heliocentric orbits. This is beyond the scope of our current work, but again, we suspect the difference in capture rates will be small. – 20 – 4.7. Survivability of captured objects The post-capture orbits are initially very irregular and prone to collisions with Jupiter's Galilean satellites (particularly its outermost, Callisto) or the planet itself. Figure 11 displays the percent of captured bodies that are delivered onto orbits that do not cross Callisto, which orbits Jupiter at 26 RJ . An interesting feature is the lack of any captures without close approaches for CJ = 3.02 and 3.025. These Jacobi constants correspond to orbital inclinations near 90◦ (see Section 4.1), where the Kozai effect is strongest. The Kozai mechanism causes the orbits to become highly eccentric and subject to collision with Jupiter or one of the Galilean satellites. This is the primary reason that no existing satellites in the Solar System have inclinations near 90◦. All of the surviving binaries plotted here capture as 2C-BIN (though not all 2C-BIN captures are survivors), largely because of the separations we have studied. The separations of these binaries are optimized to give maximum capture percentages, leading to tidal dis- ruption radii that are very close to Jupiter (Eq. 1). Thus these surviving binaries, which by definition have closest approaches outside Callisto, do not cross rtd and remain intact. The separations we have used, which are optimal for capture, do not correspond with the maximum survival rate. Somewhat larger separations would result in a higher percent of surviving captures, with a lower percent of overall captures. The consequences of this are apparent in Figure 11. For CJ < 3.02, the curves for single objects and all three binary masses are equivalent to within the error. This is because most of the binary captures in this CJ range are 2C-BIN. Since 2C-BIN captures act as a single entity with no alteration from tidal disruption, the captured population for CJ < 3.02 is similar to that of the single bodies and the fraction that avoid Callisto is also similar. While the surviving binaries for CJ > 3.025 are still all 2C-BIN, 1C captures dominate the 2C-BIN captures in this Jacobi constant range, but none of the 1C captures are safe from Callisto. Therefore, the percent of the total binary captures that survive at high Jacobi constants is very small. Thus we find that while retrograde captures (low CJ ) are rare (see Fig. 7), most of them are safe from collision with Callisto. On the contrary, prograde captures from binaries (high CJ ) are numerous but prone to collision. This is bad news for binary capture – the largest enhancements occur for captures that are most likely to be removed by interactions with Callisto. As we have already discussed, examining larger separations will lead to a larger percentage of capture orbits that are safe from collision. This may be a significant effect. How else can collisions be avoided? – 21 – One possible way out is if the captures occurred before Callisto was formed. At these early times, a dense accretion disk surrounded Jupiter, and the strong gas drag could have augmented capture rates (as in Pollack et al., 1979). However, this is not compelling, because satellites captured at this time would be prone to loss by orbital decay and later by collisions with forming proto-satellites. The most likely mechanism for preventing captured bodies from colliding is gas drag from the remaining gas present outside Callisto's orbit at the time of capture. A small amount of gas is necessary for our mechanism in order to shrink capture orbits to their current sizes. This process can also increase the pericenters of the captured objects, causing them to avoid collision with Callisto. A typical collision timescale for a Callisto-crossing orbit with a = 0.5rH and i = 10◦ is on the order of 106 years, long enough for gas to evolve the satellites onto safe orbits (see Section 1.2). The timescale is longer for more tilted orbits, but significantly shorter for retrograde orbits. A tenuous gas around Jupiter and Saturn near the end of planet formation is consistent with our current understanding of planet formation (Section 1.2). If gas was present at the time of capture, its structure and density are not well constrained, and thus we do not focus on the orbital evolution process itself in this work. As a simple example, however, we simulated a drag force that acts against the velocity vector and show that it is able to both shrink the post-capture orbits and prevent the new satellites from collision. In Fig. 12, we plot the initial and final states for a prograde and retrograde orbit. The gas drag is applied after capture for simplicity; this is valid because the timescale for temporary capture is ∼months, and the effects of the gas are negligible over such a short time. The final states are chosen so that the orbits lie approximately where the current progrades and retrogrades orbit at Jupiter (at ∼ 1 2rH, respectively), and they have pericenters outside Callisto's orbit. The drag strengths were set so that the evolution for both orbits occurs over 25,000 years. However, with a more tenuous gas than in this example, the same evolution could take place on timescales 10-100 times longer. The binary capture mechanism discussed here constrains only the amount of orbital evolution, not the evolution rate, and hence avoids the satellite loss problem of capture-by-gas-drag models. 4rH and ∼ 1 5. Discussion The new model discussed here, capture from low-mass binaries with subsequent or- bital evolution, has both significant advantages and disadvantages in comparison to other suggested models. – 22 – One important advantage is that capture is viable at Jupiter and Saturn, unlike three of the models discussed in Section 1. For example, Agnor & Hamilton's (2006) direct three- body capture model works only for very large bodies in the gas giants' high-approach-speed environments. Also, the theory of Nesvorn´y et al. (2003) requires close approaches among the giant planets, of which Jupiter has very few in the Nice model scenario. Saturn encounters its outer neighbors more frequently than Jupiter, but it still suffers from few close approaches overall in this model. In Vokrouhlick´y et al. (2007), the capture statistics from planet-binary encounters are low for all planets, but especially Jupiter and Saturn. This is primarily because of the high relative velocities assumed in their model. Though these latter two capture mechanisms in their current forms cannot explain the gas giants' irregular satellites, they are worth further study, perhaps in the context of altered versions of the Nice model or other early Solar System models. Our model also has an important advantage over that of Pollack et al., 1979, in that our capture scenario allows for a much weaker gas, since the gas here is needed for shrinking the orbits, not capturing satellites. Also, the gas in our model can persist for much longer than that in Pollack et al., as a weaker gas does not have the problem of quickly destroying the captured bodies. Furthermore, various groups (e.g., Canup & Ward, 2002) have proposed that the Galilean satellites formed from a tenuous gas; if true, the gas was most likely even thinner when the irregular satellites were captured. Thus it is important that our capture mechanism does not rely on a dense gas. To directly compare our mechanism with that of Astakhov et al. (2003), we need to consider both relative capture rates (and their survivability) and the prevalence of binaries vs. single bodies. In our simulations, we find that binary capture can provide a signifi- cant advantage over capturing from populations of single bodies for binaries with particular characteristics: high enough masses (& 100 km), optimal separations (∼10-20 RB), and low incoming energies (corresponding to Jacobi constants & 3.02 and mostly prograde encoun- ters). However, like Astakhov et al. (2003), we also find that the probability of captures (from either binaries or single bodies) of avoiding collisions with Callisto is low for readily captured progenitors. In Section 4.7, we discussed that this problem can be alleviated by altering the capture orbits with the surrounding gas or by capturing binaries with larger-than-optimal separations that do not lead to Callisto-crossing orbits. So, how common were easily-captured binaries early in Solar System history? This question is difficult to assess. Observational surveys of the current population of the cold, classical Kuiper belt (i.e. objects with modest inclinations and eccentricities) find a 30% binary fraction among bodies larger than 100 km (Noll et al., 2008), many with nearly equal mass components. Also, recent studies of planetesimal formation have suggested that – 23 – large, & 100-km bodies may form quickly in the gaseous proto-planetary disk, providing the building blocks of subsequent planet formation (Johansen et al., 2007; Cuzzi et al., 2008). Binary formation is likely to be contemporaneous with the formation of these bodies (Nesvorn´y, 2008). Further, Morbidelli et al. (2009) have shown that the size-frequency distribution of asteroids in the main belt is consistent with large initial planetesimals, at least ∼100-km in size. Together these results indicate that the ∼100-km binary objects considered here may have been quite common as the very last portions of the Solar System's gas disk were being depleted. Finally, the known irregular satellite population numbers < 100, and many of these are probably members of families – thus, we need only produce at most a few dozen captures. While accounting for the origin of such a small population is difficult, our simulations show that it is likely binaries played a role. We conclude by offering our model as a new idea that alleviates many but not all of the problems faced by previous models, but acknowledge that the without a detailed understanding of the initial population including binary statistics, a firm conclusion is not possible. – 24 – REFERENCES Agnor, C. B. and Hamilton, D. P., 2006a. Neptune's capture of its moon Triton in a binary- planet gravitational encounter. Nature 441, 192-194. Agnor, C. B. and Hamilton, D. P., 2006b. Satellite capture via binary-planet gravitational encounters. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 38, 674. Astakhov, S. A. and Farrelly, D., 2004. Capture and escape in the elliptic restricted three- body problem. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 354, 971-979. Astakhov, S. A., Burbanks, A. D., Wiggins, S., and Farrelly, D., 2003. Chaos-assisted capture of irregular moons. Nature 423, 264-267 Bate, M. R., Lubow, S. H., Ogilvie, G. I., and Miller, K. A., 2003. Three-dimensional calculations of high- and low-mass planets embedded in protoplanetary discs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 341, 213-229. Canup, R. M. and Ward, W. R., 2002. Formation of the Galilean satellites: Conditions of accretion. Astron. J. 124, 3404-3423. Cieza, L. and 19 colleagues, 2007. The Spitzer c2d survey of weak-line T Tauri stars. II. New constraints on the timescale for planet building. Astrophys. J. 667, 308-328. Colombo, G. and Franklin, F. A., 1971. On the formation of the outer satellite groups of Jupiter. Icarus 15, 186-189. ´Cuk, M. and Burns, J. A., 2004a. Gas-drag-assisted capture of Himalia's family. Icarus 167, 369-381. ´Cuk, M. and Burns, J. A., 2004b. On the secular behavior of irregular satellites. Astron. J. 128, 2518-2541. Cuzzi, J. N., Hogan, R. C., and Shariff, K., 2008. Toward planetesimals: Dense chondrule clumps in the protoplanetary nebula. Astrophys. J. 687, 1432-1447. D'Angelo, G., Henning, T., and Kley, W., 2003. Thermohydrodynamics of circumstellar disks with high-mass planets. Astrophys. J. 599, 548-576. Hamilton, D. P. and Burns, J. A., 1991. Orbital stability zones about asteroids. Icarus 92, 118-131. Henon, M., 1969. Numerical exploration of the resticted problem, V. Astron. Astrophys. 1, 223-238. – 25 – Heppenheimer, T. A. and Porco, C., 1977. New contributions to the problem of capture. Icarus 30, 385-401. Jewitt, D. and Sheppard, S., 2005. Irregular satellites in the context of planet formation. Space Science Reviews 116, 441-455. Johansen, A., Oishi, J. S., Low, M.-M. M., Klahr, H., Henning, T., and Youdin, A., 2007. Rapid planetesimal formation in turbulent circumstellar disks. Nature 448, 1022-1025. Lubow, S. H., Seibert, M., and Artymowicz, P., 1999. Disk accretion onto high-mass planets. Astrophys. J. 526, 1001-1012. Merline, W. J. and 11 colleagues, 2007. The search for Trojan binaries. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 38, 538. Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorn´y, D., and Levison, H. F., 2009. Asteroids were born big. Icarus, in press. Mosqueira, I. and Estrada, P. R., 2003. Formation of the regular satellites of giant planets in an extended gaseous nebula I: Subnebula model and accretion of satellites. Icarus 163, 198-231. Murray, C. D. and Dermott, S. F., 1999. Solar System Dynamics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK. Nesvorn´y, D., 2008. Formation of Kuiper belt binaries. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 40, 464. Nesvorn´y, D., Alvarellos, J. L. A., Dones, L., and Levison, H. F., 2003. Orbital and collisional evolution of the irregular satellites. Astron. J. 126, 398-429. Nesvorn´y, D., Vokrouhlick´y, D., and Morbidelli, A., 2007. Capture of irregular satellites during planetary encounters. Astron. J. 133, 1962-1976. Noll, K. S., Grundy, W. M., Stephens, D. C., Levison, H. F., Kern, S. D., 2008. Evidence for two populations of classical transneptunian objects: The strong inclination de- pendence of classical binaries. Icarus 194, 758-768. Papaloizou, J. C. B., Nelson, R. P., Kley, W., Masset, F. S., and Artymowicz, P., 2007. Disk-planet interactions during planet formation. In: Reipurth, D., Jewitt, D., and Keil, K. (Eds.), Protostars and Planets V, Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, 655-668. Pollack, J. B., Burns, J. A., and Tauber, M. E., 1979. Gas drag in primordial circumplanetary envelopes – a mechanism for satellite capture. Icarus 37, 587-611. – 26 – Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., and Greenzweig, Y., 1996. Formation of the giant planets by concurrent accretion of solids and gas. Icarus 124, 62-85. Rauch, K. P. and Hamilton, D. P., 2002. The HNBody package for symplectic integration of nearly-Keplerian systems. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 34, 938. Saha, P. and Tremaine, S., 1993. The orbits of the retrograde Jovian satellites. Icarus 106, 549-562. Sheppard, S. S. and Jewitt, D. C., 2003. An abundant population of small irregular satellites around Jupiter. Nature 423, 261-263. Silverstone, M. D. and 16 colleagues, 2006. Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems (FEPS): Primordial warm dust evolution from 3 to 30 Myr around Sun-like stars. Astrophys. J. 639, 1138-1146. Strutskie, M. F., Dutkevitch, D., Strom, S. E., Edwards, S., Strom, K. M., and Shure, M. A., 1990. A sensitive 10-micron search for emission arising from circumstellar dust associated with solar-type pre-main-sequence stars. Astron. J. 99, 1187-1195. Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A., and Levison, H. F., 2005. Origin of the orbital architecture of the giant planets of the Solar System. Nature 435, 459-461. Whipple, A. L. and Shelus, P. J., 1993. A secular resonance between Jupiter and its eighth satellite? Icarus 101, 265-271. Vokrouhlick´y, D., Nesvorn´y, D., and Levison, H. F., 2008. Irregular satellite capture by exchange reactions. Astron. J. 136, 1463-1476. This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. – 27 – Table 1. Mass Ratio Tests For Binaries With CJ =3.03 Total Binary Mass Component Ratio Radii (km) Mass (1019kg) Separation m1 Capture m2 Capture Total 1C Capture (km) Percentage Percentage Percentage 3:2 1:1 1:1 4:1 1:1 1:1 113-98 85-85 127-127 124-78 42-42 169-169 2.0 1.0 3.4 2.0 0.13 8.1 1350 1080 1620 1160 465 1860 0.54 0.58 0.94 0.21 0.24 1.29 0.96 0.58 0.94 1.17 0.24 1.29 1.50 1.16 1.88 1.38 0.48 2.58 Note. - Two experiments with binaries of unequal mass. The first four columns identify properties of the binary, while the final three columns list capture statistics (with m1 ≥ m2). We used the impulse approximation (Eqs. 1 and 2) to determine the properties of equivalent equal-mass binaries that match the tidal disruption radius and speed of either m1 (boldfaced) or m2 (italicized). In all cases, our predicted percentages agree with the actual measurements to within about 10%. – 28 – Fig. 1.- The speeds of unequal-mass binary components (v1 and v2) and the center-of-mass speed (vCM ) relative to Jupiter, where m1 > m2. Since the binary center of mass approaches the planet along a hyperbolic trajectory, it is always traveling faster than the escape speed (vesc). In this example, the smaller component's speed dips below the escape speed for a portion of its orbit. If the binary is disrupted during this interval, the smaller component will be captured by the planet. – 29 – 3 . 0 1 3 . 0 1 5 3.0 2 3 . 0 2 5 3 . 0 3 7 3 3 . 0 Hill sphere ∗ •J 3.035 ∗ 3.02 3 . 0 3 5 3.01 1 x (aJ) 1.05 9 3 0 . 3 1.1 0.15 0.1 0.05 ) J a ( y 0 −0.05 −0.1 3.0 3 9 9 3 3.0 7 3 3.0 3 3.0 5 2 3 . 0 3.015 0.85 0.9 0.95 Fig. 2.- The Hill sphere of Jupiter (central dot marked 'J') with zero-velocity curves (ZVCs) corresponding to the labeled Jacobi constant (CJ ) values. The Sun is to the left at (0,0) and the Jupiter-Sun separation (aJ ) is used as the unit of distance. The two asterisks are located at the planet's L1 and L2 Lagrange points. A body near Jupiter with CJ & 3.0387 (e.g., the curve for CJ = 3.039) has ZVCs enclosed around the planet, and it would be unable to escape. – 30 – 15 10 5 0 1.04 1.02 1 0.98 0.96 3.04 3.038 3.036 3.034 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Fig. 3.- Distance from the binary components (each 65-km in radius) to Jupiter (r) is plotted in units of the tidal disruption radius (rtd ≈ 70 RJ ) in the top panel; the middle panel shows the binary's separation (rB) over time, in units of its initial separation (2aB); and the bottom panel displays the Jacobi constant of each component. One component is plotted with a solid line and the other with a dotted line throughout the figure. The dashed line in the top panel indicates the tidal disruption radius. In the bottom panel, the dashed line represents the critical Jacobi constant. – 31 – Fig. 4.- The orbits of the binary components discussed in Fig. 3. Jupiter is the dot near the center of each panel, and the Sun is located to the left at (0,0). The components are plotted together in the top panel, with solid/dotted lines corresponding to those in Fig. 3. The objects are bound to each other as they approach Jupiter from the left side of each panel. A close approach to the planet tidally disrupts the binary, sending one component (dotted line) out of the system and causing the other component (solid line) to be permanently captured by the planet. The bottom panel contains only the orbit of the component that escapes, with an arrow marking the location where the binary's separation first exceeds 102% of its original value. About equidistant on the other side of the planet, the binary's separation is more than twice its initial value. – 32 – Fig. 5.- Inclination of 100-km captured binary components as a function of initial Jacobi constant, plotted for the bodies' first close approaches. Similar plots show that the relation- ship holds for all close approaches of binaries or single bodies, captured or not. Also plotted is a line connecting the mean at each Jacobi constant (marked by the stars) as well as 1-σ error bars. See Section 4.1 for discussion on the CJ-inclination relationship. – 33 – 1 0.1 0.01 10 100 1000 Fig. 6.- Three modes of capture for integrations of RB = 65-km binary pairs with CJ = 3.037, as a function of the separation of the binary (rB): one component captures ('1C'), the binary splits and both capture independently ('2C-IND'), or the binary remains bound and captures as a pair ('2C-BIN'). We plot the capture percentage for objects (rather than binaries) to facilitate comparison with single bodies (upper solid line). Recall our working definition of capture to mean bodies still orbiting the planet after 1,000 years. Note that the 2C-BIN curve approaches the value for singles at small separations while the sum of the 1C and 2C-IND captures rates approaches the same value for large separations. – 34 – Fig. 7.- Capture percentages for binaries of different masses compared to single objects. All bodies were started on Jupiter's Hill sphere. For each binary mass, a single separation was used over the range of initial Jacobi constants: 471 km = 7.25 binary radii (RB) for the 65-km binaries, 1225 km = 12.25 RB for the 100-km set, and 1512 km = 12.10 RB for 125-km binaries. These separations give near maximum capture rates for the majority of the Jacobi constants tested, with the exception of the highest CJ, where the optimum separation is closer to 20 binary radii. – 35 – Fig. 8.- Single objects integrated from two launch distances. True captures curves (with points that are solid circles) show only those captures that originated far from Jupiter, while curves that show true plus contaminated captures (with open triangles) also include objects that were stably orbiting the planet at the beginning of the integrations. For launch on the Hill sphere (1.0 rH ), we see that the prograde orbits (high CJ) are not affected at all, while many of the retrograde orbits (low CJ ) are discovered to be false. For launches at 1.1 rH, the true and true-plus-contaminated curves overlap completely, showing that contamination by false captures is effectively zero. – 36 – 3 2 1 0 3.01 3.02 3.03 Fig. 9.- Capture rates of 100-km binaries that were launched from 1.1 rH (upper dashed line), 1.2 rH (solid line), and expected capture rates for 1.2 rH (dotted line) calculated by scaling the 1.1 rH rates by the percent of 1.2 rH trajectories crossing interior to the 1.1 Hill radii. All are shown with 1-σ error bars. This scaling equalizes the capture percentages between the two launch distances to within 20%. For reference, the capture rate for single bodies starting from 1.1 rH is also plotted; compare with Fig. 7. – 37 – Retrograde Prograde Retrograde Prograde 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1C Single 2C-BIN 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1C Single 2C-BIN 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.01 3.02 3.03 Jacobi constant Jacobi constant Fig. 10.- Modes of capture vs. Jacobi constant, for integrations of 100-km binaries starting at 1.0 rH (left panel) and 1.1 rH (right panel). The 1C curve peaks are off the top of the plot at ∼4.2% for the 1.0 rH runs and ∼3.0% for the 1.1 rH group. The 2C-IND capture rates are extremely small for both starting distances (e.g., Fig. 6) and, for clarity, are not plotted here. The capture rates of single bodies are plotted for comparison. – 38 – Fig. 11.- The percent of captured objects that do not cross interior to 26 RJ (Callisto's semi-major axis) during the 1,000-year integrations. The bodies were started on the Hill sphere. Compare with the entire set of captures seen in Fig. 7. – 39 – Fig. 12.- An example of a simple gas drag applied to a prograde (left panels; the same initial orbit as in Figs. 3 and 4) and a retrograde orbit (right panels). The orbits are shown immediately after capture in the upper panels, and the bottom panels show the orbits after 25,000 years of evolution. Jupiter is the dot in the center, and the Sun is to the left at (0,0). These orbits are the result of 1C capture from equal-mass binaries with 65-km components. Before disruption, the prograde binary had a separation of 70 RB and a Jacobi constant of ∼ 3.037. The retrograde binary had an initial CJ of ∼ 3.003 and was initially separated by 460 RB.
1907.08187	1	1907	2019-07-18T17:57:52	Martian Year 34 Column Dust Climatology from Mars Climate Sounder Observations: Reconstructed Maps and Model Simulations	[ "astro-ph.EP", "physics.ao-ph" ]	We have reconstructed longitude-latitude maps of column dust optical depth (CDOD) for Martian year (MY) 34 (May 5, 2017 --- March 23, 2019) using observations by the Mars Climate Sounder (MCS) aboard NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft. Our methodology works by gridding standard and newly available estimates of CDOD from MCS limb observations, using the "iterative weighted binning" methodology. In this work, we reconstruct four gridded CDOD maps per sol, at different Mars Universal Times. Together with the seasonal and day-to-day variability, the use of several maps per sol allows to explore also the daily variability of CDOD in the MCS dataset, which is shown to be particularly strong during the MY 34 equinoctial Global Dust Event (GDE). Regular maps of CDOD are then produced by daily averaging and spatially interpolating the irregularly gridded maps using a standard "kriging" interpolator, and can be used as "dust scenario" for numerical model simulations. In order to understand whether the daily variability of CDOD has a physical explanation, we have carried out numerical simulations with the "Laboratoire de M\'et\'eorologie Dynamique" Mars Global Climate Model. Using a "free dust" run initiated at $L_s \sim 210^\circ$ with the corresponding kriged map, but subsequently free of further CDOD forcing, we show that the model is able to account for some of the observed daily variability in CDOD. The model serves also to confirm that the use of the MY 34 daily-averaged dust scenario in a GCM produces results consistent with those obtained for the MY 25 GDE.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MARTIAN YEAR 34 COLUMN DUST CLIMATOLOGY FROM MARS CLIMATE SOUNDER OBSERVATIONS: RECONSTRUCTED MAPS AND MODEL SIMULATIONS A PREPRINT Luca Montabone Space Science Institute, Boulder, CO, USA Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD/IPSL), Sorbonne Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, École Polytechnique, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD/IPSL), Sorbonne Université, Aymeric Spiga Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, École Polytechnique, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France and and Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA David M. Kass and Armin Kleinböhl Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD/IPSL), Sorbonne Université, François Forget and Ehouarn Millour Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, École Polytechnique, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France Corresponding author: Luca Montabone ([email protected]) July 19, 2019 ABSTRACT We have reconstructed longitude-latitude maps of column dust optical depth (CDOD) for Martian year (MY) 34 (May 5, 2017 -- March 23, 2019) using observations by the Mars Climate Sounder (MCS) aboard NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft. Our methodology works by gridding standard and newly available estimates of CDOD from MCS limb observations, using the "iterative weighted binning" methodology. In this work, we reconstruct four gridded CDOD maps per sol, at different Mars Universal Times. Together with the seasonal and day-to-day variability, the use of several maps per sol allows to explore also the daily variability of CDOD in the MCS dataset, which is shown to be particularly strong during the MY 34 equinoctial Global Dust Event (GDE). Regular maps of CDOD are then produced by daily averaging and spatially interpolating the irregularly gridded maps using a standard "kriging" interpolator, and can be used as "dust scenario" for numerical model simulations. In order to understand whether the daily variability of CDOD has a physical explanation, we have carried out numerical simulations with the "Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique" Mars Global Climate Model. Using a "free dust" run initiated at Ls ∼ 210◦ with the corresponding kriged map, but subsequently free of further CDOD forcing, we show that the model is able to account for A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 some of the observed daily variability in CDOD. The model serves also to confirm that the use of the MY 34 daily-averaged dust scenario in a GCM produces results consistent with those obtained for the MY 25 GDE. Plain Language Summary Large dust storms on Mars have dramatic impacts on the entire atmosphere, but may also have critical consequences for robotic and future human missions. Therefore, there is compelling need to produce an accurate reconstruction of their spatial and temporal evolution for a variety of applications, including to guide Mars climate model simulations. The recently ended Martian year 34 (May 5, 2017 -- March 23, 2019) represents a very interesting case because an extreme dust event occurred near the time of the northern autumn equinox, consisting of multiple large dust storms engulfing all longitudes and most latitudes with dust for more than 150 Martian days ("sols"). We have used satellite observations from the Mars Climate Sounder instrument aboard NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter to reconstruct longitude-latitude maps of the opacity of the atmospheric column due to the presence of dust at several times in each sol of Martian year 34. These maps allow us to analyze the seasonal, day-do-day, and day-night variability of dust in the atmospheric column, which is particularly intense during the extreme dust event. We have also used simulations with a Mars climate model to show that the strong day-night variability may be partly explained by the large-scale circulation. 1 Introduction Martian dust aerosols are radiatively active, and the dust cycle -- lifting, transport, and deposition -- is considered to be the key process controlling the variability of the Martian atmospheric circulations on a wide range of time scales (see e.g. the recent review by Kahre et al., 2017, and references therein). Dust storms are the most remarkable manifestations of this cycle, and one of the most crucial weather phenomena in need to be studied to fully understand the Martian atmosphere. Martian dust storms are: 1. a source of strong atmospheric radiative forcing, and alteration of surface energy budget (e.g. Streeter et al., 2019); 2. a major component of the atmospheric inter-annual, seasonal, day-to-day, and daily variability [e.g. Kleinböhl et al., this issue]; 3. a way to redistribute dust on the planet via long-range particle transport; 4. a key element to also understand longer-term surface changes, such as, for example, the aeolian erosion, and the retreat of the seasonal ice cap; 5. a strong disturbance of temperature and density propagating from the lower to the upper atmosphere, including the lower thermosphere, the ionosphere, and the magnetosphere [e.g. Girazian et al., and Xiaohua et al., this issue]; 6. a cause of increase of loss of chemical species via escape (Fedorova et al., 2018; Heavens et al., 2018, and Xiaohua et al., this issue); 7. a source of hazards for spacecraft Entry, Descending and Landing (EDL) manoeuvres, for operations by solar-powered surface assets, and for future robotic and human exploration (e.g. Levine et al., 2018). Dust storms on Mars can be studied by using a variety of approaches: analysis of observations from satellites and landers/rovers, numerical simulations from Global Climate Models (GCM), and data assimilation techniques. One of the most dramatic and (so far) unpredictable event linked to Martian dust storms is the onset of a Global Dust Event -- hereinafter GDE. In the literature, these events are also named "Planet-Encircling Dust Storms" (e.g. Cantor, 2007), or "Global Dust Storms". Here we choose the terminology "Global Dust Event" (already discussed and used in Montabone and Forget, 2018) because 1. even large regional storms can inject dust high enough in the atmosphere, which eventually encircles the planet, and 2. these dust events are usually characterized by several storms occurring simultaneously, or one after the other one in rapid succession. In the last Martian decade (Martian Year -- hereinafter MY -- 25 to 34), spanning nearly two Earth decades from 2000 to 2019, three GDEs occurred: an equinoctial event in MY 25, a solstitial event in MY 28, and another equinoctial event in MY 34, starting only few mean solar days -- sols -- after the corresponding onset of the MY 25 event. GDEs inject a large amount of dust particles in the Martian atmosphere, strongly modify the thermal structure and the atmospheric dynamics during several months (i.e. several tens degrees of solar longitude -- Ls -- , see e.g. Wilson and Hamilton, 1996; Montabone et al., 2005), and impact the Martian water cycle and escape rate (Fedorova et al., 2018; Heavens et al., 2018). Similar events were previously observed in Martian Years 1, 9, 10, 12, 15, and 21 (Martin and Zurek, 1993; Cantor, 2007; Montabone and Forget, 2018; Sánchez-Lavega et al., 2019). The inter-annual variability of GDEs is irregular, and likely controlled at the first-order by the redistribution of dust on Mars over the timescale of a few years (Mulholland et al., 2013; Vincendon et al., 2015). The latest equinoctial GDE had its initial explosive growth in early northern fall of MY 34 (Ls approximately in the range 185 − 190◦, i.e. late May 2018 -- early June 2018). A regional dust storm started near the location of the Mars Exploration Rover "Opportunity". The visible opacity quickly reached a very high value of 10.8, which led to the end-of-mission of the Opportunity rover, with last communication received on June 10, 2018. The regional dust storm 2 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 then moved southward along the Acidalia storm-track, and expanded both in the northern hemisphere from eastern Tharsis to Elysium (including the location of the Mars Science Laboratory "Curiosity" rover and the landing site of InSight), and towards the southern hemisphere (Malin et al., 2018). The evolution of this MY 34 GDE in summer 2018 has been closely monitored by three NASA's orbiters, including the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) and its Mars Climate Sounder (MCS) instrument [Kass et al. this issue], two ESA's orbiters (Mars Express and ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter), the ISRO's Mangalyaan orbiter, and ground-based telescopes (Sánchez-Lavega et al., 2019). It has also been observed in details from the surface by the Curiosity rover, which could still operate in dust-storm conditions thanks to its nuclear-powered system. From meteorological observations carried out aboard Curiosity with the Rover Environmental Monitoring Station, Guzewich et al. (2018) concluded that the local optical depth reached 8.5, the incident total UV solar radiation at the surface decreased by 97%, the diurnal range of air temperature decreased by 30 K, and the semidiurnal pressure tide amplitude increased to 40 Pa. Curiosity did not witness dust being lifted within the Gale Crater site, which indicates that the increase in dust loading at its location corresponds to dust particles transported in the Gale Crater area by large-scale and regional winds. Beyond the undoubtedly interesting GDE, MY 34 also features the development of an unusual late-winter large regional storm whose peak CDOD is only rivaled by that in MY 26, reaching 75% of its peak value. It is, however, reminiscent of the two global events that were successively monitored by the Viking landers in 1977 at Ls = 205◦ and Ls = 275◦ (Ryan and Henry, 1979; Zurek, 1982). Overall, therefore, MY 34 represents a unique year for studies linked to the onset/evolution of dust storms, and their impact on the entire Martian atmospheric system. Consequently, there is a compelling need to produce an accurate reconstruction of the spatial and temporal evolution of the dust optical depth in MY 34, particularly covering the GDE, but also putting the unprecedented weather measurements acquired by the InSight lander during the late-winter regional storm in the global context (Spiga et al., 2018). Montabone et al. (2015) have developed a methodology to grid values of column dust optical depth (CDOD) retrieved from multiple polar orbiting satellite observations, such as NASA's Mars Global Surveyor (MGS), Mars Odyssey (ODY), and MRO. Using this methodology (a combination of "Iterative Weighted Binning" -- IWB -- and kriging spatial interpolation), they were able to produce a multi-annual dataset of daily CDOD maps extending from MY 24 to MY 33, which is publicly available on the Mars Climate Database (MCD) project webpage at http://www-mars. lmd.jussieu.fr/ (see "Martian dust climatology"). In this paper we describe how we made use of newly processed dust opacity retrievals from thermal infrared observations of the MRO/MCS instrument (McCleese et al., 2007) in order to reconstruct maps of column dust optical depth specifically for MY 34, and describe aspects of the two-dimensional dust climatology. In Section 2, we discuss the improvements both to the MCS retrievals and to the gridding methodology described in Montabone et al. (2015). In Section 3 we analyze in general terms the CDOD variability at seasonal scale, and specifically the day-to-day evolution of the GDE and late-winter dust storm. We also address the daily variability observed when reconstructing multiple CDOD maps per sol. In Section 4, the generated "MY 34 dust scenario" (i.e. complete, daily, kriged maps) is used in simulations with the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique Mars GCM (LMD-MGCM) to 1. assess that the impact of the MY 34 GDE on the Martian atmosphere is well accounted for, and 2. verify that the GCM is able to produce some of the diurnal variability observed in the reconstructed multiple CDOD maps per sol, when the dust scenario is only used as initial condition. Conclusions are drawn in Section 5. Appendix A is devoted to clarify the versioning of the CDOD maps. 2 Building column dust optical depth maps The methodology described in Montabone et al. (2015) to grid CDOD values using the IWB, and to spatially interpolate the daily maps using kriging, has been applied to observations by MGS/Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES), ODY/Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS), and MRO/MCS from MY 24 to MY 32. For MY 33, because of the progressive change in local time of THEMIS observations, the weighting functions of the THEMIS dataset and the MCS dataset were slightly modified to favor the MCS dataset. As is mentioned in the introduction, version 2.0 (v2.1 for MY 33) of both irregularly gridded maps and regularly kriged ones ("dust scenarios") are available on the MCD project website. For the specific case of the MY 34 GDE, the MCS team has updated their retrievals of temperature, dust and water ice profiles. We have correspondingly updated the gridding/kriging methodology with the aim of producing a more refined and accurate climatology, both for scientific studies and for the use in numerical model simulations. Therefore, in the following we describe how we reconstruct CDOD maps for MY 34 (currently version 2.5). We provide some details about the differences between current and previous versions (i.e. v2.2, v2.3, and v2.4) in Appendix A. 3 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 2.1 Observational dataset In MY 34, single THEMIS CDOD retrievals are no longer available. Because of the late local time of THEMIS observations in MY 34, Smith et al. [this issue] had to develop a "stacking" algorithm that assesses how a group of THEMIS spectra in a solar longitude/latitude bin change as a function of estimated thermal contrast. Therefore, we do not use THEMIS any more in MY 34 and we completely rely on estimated CDODs from MCS. Dust opacity retrievals from thermal infrared observations of the Mars Climate Sounder instrument aboard MRO are described in Kleinböhl et al. (2009); Kleinböhl et al. (2011); Kleinböhl et al. (2017a). The currently standard MCS dataset, based on the v5.2 "two-dimensional" retrieval algorithm specifically described in (Kleinböhl et al., 2017a), has been reprocessed by the MCS team during the time of the MY 34 GDE to obtain better coverage in the vertical and, therefore, more reliable estimates of CDOD values during the event [Kleinböehl et al., this issue]. This latest MCS dataset, only available between May 21, 2018 (Ls ∼ 179◦) and October 15, 2018 (Ls ∼ 269◦), labelled v5.3.2, is an interim version that includes the use of a far infrared channel for retrievals of dust. The differences between MCS retrievals version 5.2 and 5.3 are as follows: • Use of B1 detectors to extend the dust profile retrieval: the dust extinction efficiency in channel B1 at 32 µm is only about half the value of channel A5 at 22 µm (Kleinböhl et al., 2017b), which is the primary channel for dust retrievals, allowing profiles to extend deeper by 1 to 1.5 scale heights; • Accepting more opacity from aerosols in the temperature retrieval channel A3; • Modifications for determining surface temperature when there are no matching on-planet views (primarily cross-track views) to improve the performance under high dust conditions when the array is lifted and limb views do not intersect the surface. CDODs are estimated by integrating the dust opacity profiles after an extrapolation from the lowest altitude at which profile information is available, under the assumption of homogeneously mixed dust [see Fig. 1 of Kleinböehl et al., this issue]. For the reconstructed CDOD maps in MY 34, we use MCS v5.3.2 estimated CDODs from Ls ∼ 179◦ to Ls ∼ 269◦, and MCS v5.2 otherwise. 2.2 Data Quality Control A general discussion about the limitations of using CDOD estimates from MCS is included in Montabone et al. (2015), specifically Section 2.1.2. As is mentioned in the previous sub-section, the extended vertical coverage in MCS v5.3.2 helps estimate CDODs more accurately. In the present work, therefore, we have improved the definition of the Quality Control (QC) procedure with respect to the one used in Montabone et al. (2015), particularly by allowing a more extensive use of dayside observations. We define dayside observations as those with local times in the range 09:00 < lt ≤ 21:00, although most of dayside observations at low latitudes have local times close to 15:00. Nightside observations are defined as those outside the dayside range, with most nightside observations at low altitude having local times close to 03:00. Note that MCS is also able to observe cross-track, thus providing information in a range of local times at selected positions during the MRO orbits (Kleinböhl et al., 2013). We have also better defined a dust quality flag in MCS v5.3.2 to help filtering those observations where a significant number of detectors were excluded in the retrieval of the dust opacity profile, because of radiance residuals exceeding threshold values (Kleinböhl et al., 2009). Each excluded detector corresponds to a truncation of ∼ 5 km from the altitude range that was originally selected by the retrieval algorithm based on line-of-sight opacity. We apply the following QC procedure to the MCS CDOD values at 21.6 µm in extinction: • To discard values when they are most likely contaminated by CO2 ice (i.e. if, at any level below 40 km altitude, • To discard values when water ice opacity is greater than dust opacity at the cut-off altitude of the corresponding the temperature is T < TCO2 + 10K, and the presumed dust opacity is larger than 10−5 km−1); dust profile; • To discard cross-track CDODs with cut-off altitudes higher than 8 km (i.e. the corresponding dust opacity profiles do not extend down to 8 km altitude or lower); • To discard dayside values with cut-off altitudes higher than 8 km unless it is MCS v5.3.2 data or MCS v5.2 data during the late-winter dust storm (i.e. for Ls ≤ 179◦, 269◦ < Ls ≤ 312◦, and Ls ≥ 350◦). Additionally, we discard dayside CDODs with cut-off altitudes higher than 16 km in a short period before the onset of the GDE (179◦ < Ls < 186.5◦) and during the late-winter dust storm (312◦ < Ls < 350◦). No filtering based on cut-off altitude is applied during the GDE for dayside CDODs; 4 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 • To discard CDODs when more than 1 detector is excluded inside the limits of the MCS v5.3.2 (179◦ ≤ Ls ≤ 269◦) as well as if any detector is excluded in MCS v5.2 during the late-winter dust storm (312◦ < Ls < 350◦); • To assign a fixed value of 0.01 to very low values of CDOD < 0.01 having cut-off altitude higher than 4 km. We plot in Fig.1 the percentage number of CDOD values that are flagged by each individual filter, together with the total of the filtered values after the application of the complete QC procedure. The total does not correspond to the sum of each single filter, as a CDOD value can be flagged by multiple filters. This figure clearly shows that the presence of water ice in spring and summer strongly affects the number of CDOD values passing the QC. Dayside values are also problematic because their corresponding dust profiles usually have rather high cut-off altitudes, compared to nightside values. Cross-track values have the tendency to exhibit rather high cut-off altitudes as well, and lead to questionable column dust optical depths. As a consequence, a large number of them at low- and mid-latitudes are discarded throughout the year. Observations where more than one detector was excluded in the retrieval are about 20% throughout MCS v5.3.2. The number of values filtered because of possible carbon dioxide ice contamination is relatively low throughout the year (less than 10%). Figure 1: Percentage number of CDOD values flagged by each individual filter in the QC procedure within 30◦ solar longitude ranges in MY 34 (color lines), together with the percentage total number of filtered CDODs after the application of the complete QC procedure (black line). The numbers are associated to the middle of each 30◦ solar longitude range. Note that the "excluded detector" filter does not apply before Ls = 179◦ and for 269◦ < Ls < 312◦, and that the "dayside" filter does not apply during the GDE (186.5◦ ≤ Ls ≤ 269◦). Note that, despite the improvements in MCS v5.3.2, the main issue for estimating CDODs using limb observations remains the fact that many dust opacity profiles have rather high cut-off altitudes (particularly dayside ones, see also third column of Fig.3), because of either large dust or water ice opacities. This implies to extrapolate the profiles for a long altitude range under the assumption of homogeneously mixed dust, thus increasing the uncertainty on the column values. After QC, the number of available values is plotted in Fig.2, separated between nightside and dayside values. The aphelion cloud belt and the winter polar hoods are mainly responsible for the lack of data at equatorial latitudes in the dayside plot, and at high latitudes in both dayside and nightside plots. The implementation of the new "water ice" filter is effective in reducing the probability that the lowest levels of the dust profiles are contaminated by the presence of clouds, but there is a risk of filtering out retrievals that actually may have been usable, particularly at high latitudes. A refinement of this filter can be addressed in future work. Vertical bands with no data are periods when MCS did not observe. 2.3 Data uncertainties and processing Together with the QC procedure, we have also revised the empirical method to estimate the uncertainties on the MCS CDOD values at 21.6 µm in extinction, with respect to the one used in Montabone et al. (2015). We apply the following relative uncertainties: 5 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 2: Number of nightside (upper panel) and dayside (lower panel) values of column dust optical depth available for gridding after passing the quality control procedure described in the text. The number of values is summed in 1 sol × 2◦ latitude bins, and plotted as a function of sol from the beginning of MY 34, corresponding solar longitude, and latitude. Dayside observations are defined to have local times in the range ]09:00, 21:00], whereas nightside observations are defined to have local times in [00:00, 09:00] and ]21:00, 24:00]. • 10% for CDOD values < 0.01 having cut-off altitude higher than 4 km (i.e. for those values replaced with CDOD=0.01); • 5% for CDOD values < 0.01 or values with cut-off altitudes lower than 4 km; • When CDOD ≥ 0.01 or cut-off altitude ≥ 4 km, we assign the largest relative uncertainty between the one calculated as a linear function of CDOD and the one calculated as a linear function of the cut-off altitude. The two functions are defined in such a way that the uncertainty is 5% if CDOD = 0.01 or cut-off altitude = 4 km, 20% if CDOD = 1.5, and 30% if cut-off altitude = 25 km. As detailed in Montabone et al. (2015), further data processing consists in converting MCS CDODs from 21.6 µm in extinction to absorption-only 9.3 µm by multiplying by 2.7, to be consistent with the climatologies of the previous Martian years. We then normalize the values to the reference pressure level of 610 Pa, but instead of using the surface pressure value calculated by the MCD pres0 routine (Forget et al., 2007), we now use the same surface pressure value used for the corresponding MCS retrieval. MCS retrieves pressure at the pointing altitude where it is most sensitive to pressure (typically 20-30 km (Kleinböhl et al., 2009)), from which surface pressure can be extrapolated with an uncertainty estimate based on pointing uncertainty. In conditions where a pressure retrieval is unsuccessful (typically in conditions of high aerosol loading) the MCS algorithm uses pressure derived from the climatological Viking surface pressure (Withers, 2012). In this case, the uncertainty of the surface pressure is derived from the day-to-day root mean squared of surface pressure from the MCD v5.3, interpolated at the specific location and season of an observation using a pre-built 5◦ solar longitude × 5◦ latitude array (as described in Section 2.3 of Montabone et al., 2015). 2.4 Gridding methodology In this work we closely follow the basic principles of reconstructing CDOD maps, which have been detailed in Montabone et al. (2015). Iterative Weighted Binning (IWB) is applied to CDOD values at 9.3 µm in absorption, normalized to 610 Pa, together with their corresponding uncertainties, to produce gridded values on a 6◦ longitude × 5◦ latitude map, with possible "no value" assigned at locations where data do not satisfy given requirements. The current 6 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 criterion to accept a value of weighted average at a particular grid point at any given iteration is that there must be at least one observation within a distance of 200 km from the grid point, while the other parameters listed for MCS in Table 1 of Montabone et al. (2015) remain the same. The key difference with respect to the methodology described in Section 3 of Montabone et al. (2015) is that in this work we create four gridded maps per sol at four different Mars Universal Times (MUT, i.e. the local time at 0◦ longitude), opportunely separating the contribution of dayside and nightside observations. We achieve this by 1. considering observations in iterative time windows (TW) centered at four MUTs rather than simply at MUT = 12:00 (this is equivalent to a 6-hour rather than 24-hour moving average), and 2. calculating the local time of each grid point and imposing that only observations with local times within ±7 hours in the current TW are considered for gridding at that grid point. The result of applying this updated methodology is illustrated as an example in Fig. 3 for a sol in the growing phase of the GDE. In the first column we show the CDOD values effectively used for gridding (specifically for TW = 7 sols) in the four maps with MUTs = 00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00. The distinction between nightside tracks (positive slope) and dayside ones (negative slope) is evident. Because we have used a ±7 hour range for accepting observations at each grid point, there is a superposition of nightside and dayside values at some longitudes, which allows for a smoother transition between the two. The distinction in local time is highlighted in the second column of Fig. 3. Here we plot the local time difference between each observation and the grid point close to which it is located. Clearly there are two longitude ranges (with local times around 03:00 and 15:00) within which these differences are small, for each different MUT map. These correspond to the locations spanned by the MRO orbit for that specific MUT, whereas higher values of the local time difference correspond to locations spanned by the MRO orbit at a different MUT time, but always within the considered iterative TW. Since we show examples with TW = 7 in Fig. 3, there are multiple orbit tracks with similar local time differences, but corresponding to different sols. It is the time weight defined in the IWB procedure, together with the distance and quality of observation weights, that define the contribution of each single observation to the grid point average, plotted in the fourth column. Note that these gridded maps are already the result of the iterative application of four time windows -- refer to Figure 6 of Montabone et al. (2015) for an example of how we derive a gridded map using observations in successive TWs. It is necessary to discuss in depth the differences among the maps at different MUTs, because these are the novel result of this work. When looking at the four MUT maps in the fourth row of Fig. 3, in fact, a clear daily variation of CDOD can be appreciated, particularly pronounced in the latitude band [20◦, 70◦]S (see also Section 3 and Fig. 12). This variation of CDOD has the characteristics of a Sun-synchronous wave with wavenumber one: smaller optical depths are found at night, larger optical depths occur during the day. The daily variation is well accounted for in the MCS CDODs, as shown in the first row of Fig. 3, and is not an artefact of the gridding methodology, nor is limited to the sol showed in Fig. 3, as Fig. 12 clearly demonstrates. Furthermore, this strong daily variation of CDOD corresponds very well both in solar longitude (in the growing phase of the GDE) and in latitude to the strong daily variations of the MCS dust opacity profiles, as described in Kleinböhl et al. [this issue. In that paper, GCM simulations can account for the daily variability of the dust profiles, and explain the likely dynamical effects at the origin of this phenomenon. The question arises, then, whether the daily variability observed in MCS CDOD can also have a dynamical origin, or can be explained otherwise. We address the possibility of a dynamical origin with GCM simulations in Section 4, while we point out here that interpreting results from MCS CDODs is particularly challenging, as already mentioned in Subsection 2.2. The third row of Fig. 3, in fact, shows that the dust profiles in the latitude band where the daily CDOD differences are more pronounced have quite different cut-off altitudes above the local surface between day and night: nightside profiles tend to extend lower in altitude, while dayside profiles are generally cut-off at higher altitudes. This is due to several factors, although it is primarily driven by the altitude at which the retrieval algorithm finds the atmosphere too opaque in the limb path. The increase in the amount of dust (and its vertical extent) in the dayside profiles causes them to terminate further from the surface than the nightside ones, on average. We have taken into account the quality of the retrieval fit to the measured radiances by selecting profiles with no more than one detector rejected due to fitting poorly. As previously pointed out, the different cut-off altitudes for nightside and dayside retrievals imply that the uncertainty in the CDOD extrapolation is larger during the day, but it does not necessarily imply that the homogeneously mixed dust assumption is not valid, particularly during the peak of the GDE. We refer to Section 3 for further considerations about this point. 2.5 Reference MY 34 dust climatology The gridded and corresponding kriged maps of CDOD described in (Montabone et al., 2015) have been used as reference multi-annual dust climatology in several studies and applications, including the production of MCD statistics. It is, therefore, compelling to produce a reference MY 34 climatology following the approach established for the previous Martian years. 7 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 3: This figure shows longitude-latitude maps at four different Mars Universal Times (MUT = 00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00) in each column, for sol-of-year (SOY) 400, Ls ∼ 196◦, in the growing phase of the GDE (The SOY is the integer sol number starting from SOY=1 as first sol of the year). In the first row we plot the values of IR absorption (9.3 µm) CDOD at 610 Pa for observations within a time window TW = 7 sols centered around the corresponding MUT. In the second row we show the local time difference between the same observations and the grid point around which they are located. The cut-off altitude above the local surface of the dust profile corresponding to each observation is shown in the third column. Finally, the gridded maps of IR absorption (9.3 µm) CDOD at 610 Pa obtained by applying the iterative weighted binning methodology (Montabone et al., 2015) to the observations shown in the first three rows are plotted in the fourth row. These gridded maps are already the result of the iterative application of four TW = 1, 3, 5, and 7 sols. 8 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Although in this work we produce four gridded maps per sol, we calculate the daily average and we use only one map per sol to build the reference MY 34 climatology. We do so because 1. the daily variability of MCS CDOD is not yet soundly confirmed by independent observations, 2. it is not clear that using a dust scenario with daily variability in model simulations does not trigger spurious effects, e.g. erroneously forcing the tides, and 3. we would like to be consistent with climatologies from previous Martian years. We show in Fig. 4 an example of daily averaged gridded map and corresponding kriged one, for the same sol as in Fig. 3. The gridded map results more complete than any single MUT map, and rather spatially smooth. The transition to maps at previous and subsequent sols is also rather smooth (see e.g. Figs. 9 and 11). We should mention that, in contrast to Montabone et al. (2015), we no longer modify the values of the gridded maps in a latitude band around the southern polar cap edge before applying the kriging interpolation. This was previously done to artificially introduce climatological "south cap edge storms" and balance TES and MCS years in term of dust lifted at the south cap edge. The use of MCS v5.3.2 retrievals extending to lower altitudes, and the fact that TES CDOD retrievals at the south cap edge are being revised (M. Smith, personal communication) alleviates the need for such correction. The MY 34 daily maps of gridded and kriged IR absorption CDOD normalized to 610 Pa are included in NetCDF files together with maps of several other variables, as detailed in Appendix B of (Montabone et al., 2015). We note that, following the Montabone et al. (2015) sol-based Martian calendar (see their Appendix A for a description), MY 34 has 668 sols, therefore we provide 668 gridded maps -- MY 34 new year's solar longitude is 359.98. The dust scenario, though, has always 669 kriged maps for practical reasons, hence the last sol of the MY 34 dust scenario is the first sol of MY 35. Both gridded and kriged maps version 2.5 for MY 34 will be publicly available at the dedicated webpage on the MCD project website hosted by the LMD at the URL: http://www-mars.lmd.jussieu.fr/ after the version of this manuscript submitted to the Journal of Geophysical Research - Planets is accepted for publication. A beta version of these maps is currently available upon request to the corresponding author. 2.6 Validation An important aspect of producing a reference dataset for the dust climatology is its validation with independent observations. The Opportunity rover entered safe mode right at the onset of the GDE, while the Curiosity rover took measurements of visible dust optical depth throughout the GDE using its MastCAM camera (Guzewich et al., 2018). Hence, we use measurements from Curiosity for validation, together with publicly available visible images taken by the Mars Color Imager (MARCI) camera aboard MRO. Figure 5 show the comparison between the time series of the dust optical depth (sol-averaged and normalized to 610 Pa) observed by Curiosity rover in Gale crater during the GDE (Guzewich et al., 2018), and the time series of CDOD extracted from the gridded maps and averaged in a longitude-latitude box centered on Gale crater (after conversion to equivalent visible values). The gridded maps are able to fairly well reproduce the timing and decay of the GDE around Gale, but they underestimate the peak of the event. Furthermore, they overestimate the decay between Ls ∼ 205◦ and Ls ∼ 215◦, although within the uncertainty limit. There are spatial inhomogeneities in the CDOD field even during the mature phase of the GDE that may account for some of the differences. Also note that Gale crater is a challenging location for MCS to observe due to MRO providing relay services to the Curiosity rover. In particular the number of in-track profiles is limited and may be geographically biased. Finally, if kriged maps were used instead of the gridded maps, the time series would be practically indistinguishable from the magenta line in Fig. 5 (not shown here). We show the comparison between one of our gridded CDOD maps and a MARCI image in Fig. 6. The comparison is done for June 6, 2018, at the onset of the GDE, which corresponds to SOY 387 in our dataset. The extension of the dust cloud in both the MARCI image and the CDOD map is similar, with both showing intense activity around Meridiani, an eastward progression of the storm, and relatively clear skies over the Tharsis volcanoes. This specific CDOD map fails to show the onset of the south polar cap edge dust activity, but maps at subsequent sols do. 3 Seasonal, day-to-day, and daily variability of column dust In this Section we analyze the variability at different temporal scales, which is included in the MY 34 dust climatology reconstructed from MCS CDODs. In particular, we look at the seasonal, day-to-day, and daily variability, as showed in Figures 7 to 13. Starting from the seasonal variability, Fig. 7 shows the latitude vs time plot of the zonally and daily averaged CDOD obtained from both the gridded maps and the kriged ones. This comparison shows that the kriged maps have the advantage of being complete (i.e. CDOD values are assigned at every grid point) while preserving the overall properties of the dust distribution. Montabone and Forget (2018) noted that Martian years show two distinctive seasons with respect to the atmospheric dust loading, when a comparison of multi-annual zonal means of CDOD is carried out: a 9 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 4: Daily averaged gridded map (upper panel) and corresponding kriged map (lower panel) of 9.3 µm absorption column dust optical depth for SOY 400, Ls ∼ 196◦, in the growing phase of the GDE. The gridded map showed here is the daily average of the four maps in the fourth column of Fig. 3. The spatial resolution of the gridded map is 6◦ longitude × 5◦ latitude, whereas the resolution of the kriged one is 3◦ longitude × 3◦ latitude. The black boxes in the maps highlight the averaging area around Gale crater used in Figures 5 for comparison with the CDOD measured by the Curiosity rover. 10 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 5: Time series of equivalent visible column dust optical depth calculated from the 9.3 µm absorption CDOD normalized to 610 Pa, extracted from the daily averaged gridded maps in an area around Gale crater (magenta line), compared to the time series of visible column optical depth measured by MastCAM aboard NASA's "Curiosity" rover (black line). Curiosity observations (Guzewich et al., 2018) have been daily averaged and normalized to 610 Pa (using the surface pressure from the Mars Climate Database pres0 routine). Both time series are shown between Sol-of-Year 355 and 500, i.e. Ls ∼ [170◦, 260◦]. We used a factor of 2.6 to convert 9.3 µm absorption CDOD into equivalent visible ones. Data from gridded maps are averaged in the area shown by a black box in Fig. 4 (i.e. longitude=[123◦E, 153◦E], latitude=[15◦S, 10◦N]) centered around Curiosity landing site at longitude 137.4◦E and latitude 4.6◦S. Light and dark grey shades show the uncertainty envelope (1-sigma) respectively for Curiosity's time series and the time series extracted from the gridded maps. "low dust loading" (LDL) season between Ls ∼ 10◦ and Ls ∼ 140◦, and a "high dust loading" (HDL) season at other times, when regional dust storms and global dust events are most likely to occur -- commonly referred to as the "dust storm season". MY 34 does not differ, as dust started to increase above the 0.15 level (IR absorption at 9.3 µm) after Ls ∼ 160◦, following a quiet LDL season (see Fig. 8 as well, which is the time series obtained from the latitude vs time plot by averaging also in the latitude band [60◦S, 40◦N]). Nevertheless, the optical depth abruptly increased after Ls ∼ 186◦ due to the onset of the GDE, which rapidly grew to the west of Meridiani Planum, expanded eastwards and southwards, and spread a large amount of dust at all longitudes within approximately a latitude band [60◦S, 40◦N] (see its day-to-day evolution over 12 sols in Fig. 9), then slowly decaying over about 130 sols, as can be observed from the tail of the GDE peak in Fig. 8. MY 34 also featured two other maxima in CDOD that are climatologically consistent with all other 10 previously observed years: one at southern polar latitudes centered at Ls ∼ 270◦, and the other one in a latitude band [60◦S, 40◦N] peaking at Ls ∼ 325◦. These maxima are linked to a regional dust storm occurring over the ice-freed southern polar region, and to a particularly intense late-winter regional storm (see its day-to-day evolution over 12 sols in Fig.11). The latter has the characteristics of a flushing storm following the Acidalia-Chryse storm track, although its precise origin cannot be easily tracked in the gridded maps of CDOD. Finally, the absence of significant storms in a range of solar longitude centered around Ls ∼ 300◦ -- the so-called "solsticial pause" -- is also climatologically consistent with what observed in previous years (Montabone et al., 2015; Kass et al., 2016; Lewis et al., 2016; Montabone and Forget, 2018, and Xiaohua et al., this issue). Before moving to the analysis of the CDOD daily variability, there is a final consideration we ought to do about the variability of dust storms. When comparing the day-to-day evolution of the GDE and the late winter storm in Figs. 9 and 11 at their early stage, they look pretty similar both in intensity and extension. Furthermore, the shapes of the CDOD peaks in the time series of Fig. 8 are also comparable (both positively skewed, with sharp increase and long decreasing tail). What really does make the difference is the fact that a GDE such as the one in MY 34 took about 35 sols of 11 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 6: The background global image of Mars in this Figure is referenced PIA22329 in the NASA photojournal (credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS). It shows the growing MY 34 GDE as of June 6, 2018. The map was produced by the Mars Color Imager (MARCI) camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft. The blue dot shows the approximate location of the Opportunity rover. We overlap on this image the column dust optical depth kriged map for the corresponding sol (sol-of-year 387), which we have reconstructed from MCS observations. The IR absorption (9.3 µm) CDOD map (not normalized to 610 Pa) is plotted as filled colored contours. continuous dust injection into the atmosphere to reach a peak in average CDOD that is more than twice as high than the one reached by the (still rather intense) late-winter regional storm. This includes a much larger spatial variability during the GDE, as indicated by the RMSD in Fig. 8. An event that was very important in boosting the equinoctial dust storm into the GDE class was the activation of secondary lifting centers in the Tharsis region, which seems to start around SOY 401 in the gridded maps (Ls ∼ 197◦), and later in the Terra Sabaea region -- although one cannot distinguish from the maps whether the increase of optical depth in this region is the result of eastward transport from Tharsis or local dust lifting, or both. When looking at the CDOD day-by-day evolution in Fig. 10, this event can be considered as a second dust storm within the first one, without which we could have just witnessed a regional storm instead of a GDE. This is one of the reasons why names like "global dust storm" or "planet-encircling dust storm" do not seem to capture the real nature of this type of extreme events, which are not single storms nor uniquely planet-encircling. Perhaps even "global dust event" is not particularly appropriate, as high latitude regions are mostly free of dust -- although indirectly affected by the dust via dynamical effects. One possibility is to call these events for what they really are: "extreme dust events" (EDE). Another extreme characteristic of the equinoctial event is its strong daily variability, clearly observed by MCS in the elevation of the dayside vs nightside dust profiles (see Kleinböhl et al, this issue), but also featured in the column optical depth values, as already shown in Fig. 3. The time series at different locations extracted from the dataset with four MUT maps per sol and shown in Fig. 12 clearly illustrates this phenomenon. The nightside-dayside variability is different at different locations, but is particularly dramatic in Aonia Terra, which is located in the southern latitude band where Kleinböhl et al [this issue] observe strong variability in the dust profiles. In Fig. 13, therefore, we compare the CDOD values in Aonia Terra at two times during the GDE (i.e. during its growth phase and near the peak) with the corresponding dust opacity profiles that are extrapolated and integrated in order to estimate the CDODs. The raise in altitude of about 20 km (either above local surface or above the areoid) of the dayside dust profiles with respect to the 12 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 night profiles is quite spectacular at Ls ∼ 207◦, near the peak of the GDE. Unfortunately, with the raise in altitude of the large opacity values comes the raise in cut-off altitude of the dust profiles. However, from Fig. 13 one cannot conclude that the homogeneously mixed dust hypothesis at the core of our dust profile extrapolation to the ground does not hold in these cases. Conversely, there is no evidence that raising dust is replaced by more well mixed dust in the missing part of the profile, because we simply have no data. Furthermore, uncertainties at the lowest levels of dust profiles during the GDE tend to be larger (see e.g. left panel of Fig. 1 in Kleinböhl et al. this issue), hence the real shape of the profile in the lowest two scale heights could provide some surprise. At this point of the analysis, we can make three hypotheses about the daily variability observed in MCS CDOD: 1. There is an intrinsic variability of the column dust. In this case, quite a substantial amount of dust must be supplied in the lowest two scale heights during the day, where MCS cannot see through. This extra dust must either be lifted locally from the ground or supplied via horizontal advection (or both). Local mesoscale effects might operate at different locations (e.g. katabatic/anabatic winds, strong convective activity, etc.) 2. There is no significant variability in the column dust. In this case, atmospheric dust is simply moved up and down during the day/night, and the dayside dust opacities actually decrease with decreasing altitude in the lowest scale heights, not seen by MCS. The daily variability of the dust opacity profiles in the lowest two scale heights during the GDE would then be expected to be very large, in order to compensate for the raise in altitude of the dust cloud. 3. There is some variability in the column dust. In this case, dust is partly moved up and down at different local times, and partly lifted locally, or advected from nearby locations. In order to help us clarifying which hypothesis is more likely, we have carried out simulations with the LMD-GCM, which we are going to discuss in the next section. Figure 7: MY 34 latitude vs time plot of the zonally and daily averaged gridded maps of 9.3 µm absorption column dust optical depth normalized to the reference pressure level of 610 Pa (upper panel), compared to the same using kriged maps (lower panel). White colour in the upper panel indicates missing data. 13 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 8: Time series of column dust optical depth (9.3 µm in absorption, normalized to 610 Pa) extracted from the daily averaged gridded maps and averaged at all longitude in the latitude band [60◦S, 40◦N]. The grey shade represents the root mean squared deviation, i.e. the spatial variability within the averaged longitudes and latitudes (note that the daily variability is not included). 4 Global Climate Model simulations of the MY 34 Global Dust Event The simulations we have carried out using the LMD-MGCM have similar characteristics to those carried out to build the Mars Climate Database version 5.3 (Millour et al., 2015), except for the model top being set at 100 km (with 29 vertical levels) and the thermospheric parameterizations (González-Galindo et al., 2011) being switched off. The most up-to-date physical parameterizations are included: interactive dust cycle (Madeleine et al., 2011), thermal plume model (Colaïtis et al., 2013), water cycle with radiative effect of clouds (Madeleine et al., 2012) and full microphysics scheme (Navarro et al., 2014). The "rocket dust storm" parameterization recently built and tested by Wang et al. (2018) is not included in this version of the GCM. The horizontal grid features 64 × 48 longitude-latitude points. The initial state for the MY 34 run at Ls = 0◦ uses the "climatological" dust scenario typical of MYs devoid of global dust events. Then, two types of simulations are carried out: 1. a simulation using the reference MY 34 dust scenario v2.5 (i.e. the maps kriged from the daily averaged gridded maps, as discussed in Section 2.5) to force the dust column field throughout the GDE period; 2. a simulation using the MY 34 dust scenario until Ls = 210◦ (around the peak of the GDE), then continuing as a "free-dust" run for a few sols, with no more external forcing on the column dust field. Furthermore, given the availability of a dust scenario for MY 25 (Montabone et al., 2015) and the presence of an equinoctial GDE in that year, with comparable characteristics to the one in MY 34, we have also carried out a forced simulation for MY 25, for comparison. The LMD-MGCM simulations for MY 34 are also used in Kleinböhl et al. [this issue] to discuss the diurnal cycle of the vertical distribution of dust observed by MCS. We use the two types of simulations for two different purposes: 1. the forced run is used to analyse some of the impacts of the MY 34 GDE on the local and global dynamics, thus verifying that the use of a daily averaged dust scenario produces reasonable results, consistent with those for MY 25; 2. the "free dust" run is used to identify possible daily variability of the column dust in the model, which could corroborate one of the three hypotheses provided at the end of last Section, Figure 14 shows a comparison between the surface temperature measured by the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL Curiosity Guzewich et al., 2018) and the surface temperature computed by the LMD Mars GCM. When the MY 34 global dust event starts, the diurnal amplitude of temperature is reduced: daytime temperatures are lower as a result of 14 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 9: Initial evolution of the MY 34 Global Dust Event. Each panel shows daily averaged gridded column dust optical depth (in absorption at 9.3µm) normalized to the reference pressure level of 610 Pa. From top left to bottom right, maps are provided from sol-of-year 383 to sol-of-year 394 (i.e. from Ls ∼ 186◦ to Ls ∼ 193◦). See also Appendix A of Montabone et al. (2015) for the description of the sol-based Martian calendar we use in this paper. 15 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 10: Same as Fig.9 but for the MY 34 secondary storm within the GDE. From top left to bottom right, maps are provided from sol-of-year 401 to sol-of-year 412 (i.e. from Ls ∼ 197◦ to Ls ∼ 204◦). Note that the scale for the CDOD values has changed with respect to Fig. 9. 16 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 11: Same as Fig.9 but for the MY 34 late-winter regional storm. From top left to bottom right, maps are provided from sol-of-year 596 to sol-of-year 607 (i.e. from Ls ∼ 320◦ to Ls ∼ 326◦). The scale for the CDOD value is the same as in Fig. 9. 17 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 12: Time series of column dust optical depth (9.3 µm in absorption, normalized to 610 Pa) extracted from the gridded maps with four MUT per sol in three different areas: Meridiani Planum (longitude=[15◦W, 15◦E], latitude=[15◦S, 15◦N), Hellas Planitia (longitude=[55◦E, 85◦E], latitude=[60◦S, 30◦S), and Aonia Terra (East of Argyre Planitia: longitude=[90◦W, 60◦W], latitude=[60◦S, 30◦S). The time series are shown between Sol-of-Year 355 and 500, i.e. Ls ∼ [170◦, 260◦]. visible absorption of incoming sunlight being more efficient in a dustier atmosphere, and nighttime temperatures are higher as a result of increased infrared radiation emitted towards the surface in a dustier atmosphere. The temporal variability of temperature (absolute and relative values) is well reproduced for the nighttime minimum temperature, but less so for the daytime temperatures (although the qualitative behaviour is correct). There might be three reasons for this: 1. thermal inertia is not well represented in the LMD-MGCM for daytime conditions in Gale Crater; 2. the CDOD observed by MCS in the region of Gale crater is underestimated with respect to the one observed by Curiosity from Ls ∼ 195◦ to Ls ∼ 202◦, and by consequence the corresponding gridded maps and dust scenario are low-biased at those times (see Fig. 5 in Section 2.6); 3. the accuracy of the calculations by the model radiative transfer could decrease under extreme dust loading conditions, or could be affected by an inaccurate distribution of particle sizes. An important test of the dynamical behavior of our LMD-MGCM simulation forced by the MY 34 dust scenario is how thermal tides react to the global increase of dust opacity following the onset of the GDE. Figure 15 shows several daily cycles of surface pressure corresponding to the onset of the MY 25 and MY 34 GDEs; Figure 16 presents a spectral analysis. Both the amplitude of the daily pressure cycle, and its morphology, are modified by the GDE at its onset. The diurnal pressure cycle is dominated by the diurnal tide before the GDE takes place. When the GDE starts to build up and the column optical depth increases, the diurnal mode increases slightly in amplitude while the semi-diurnal mode increases significantly compared to the other modes, as is already described in previous studies (Zurek and Martin, 1993; Wilson and Hamilton, 1996; Lewis and Barker, 2005, their Figure 5). The reinforcement of the semi-diurnal tide with increased column opacity is due to the fact that this tide component is dominated by a Hough mode with a large vertical wavelength (Chapman and Lindzen, 1970). As a result, this Hough mode is very sensitive to forcing extended in altitude such as the absorption of incoming sunlight by dust particles during a dust storm. Those major changes in the tidal modes take only a couple of sols to react to the GDE onset: after their respective onsets, the GDE of MY 34 and MY 25 basically exhibit a very similar diurnal pressure cycle. This similarity between MY 34 and MY 25 is actually a good cross-calibration test for the reconstructed dust scenarios, since MY 25 is based on retrieved column optical depths from TES nadir observations, while MY 34 is based on estimated values from MCS limb observations. Interestingly, comparing the cases of MY 25 and MY 34 at the Curiosity and Opportunity landing sites in Figure 15 highlights the fact that the modification of the thermal tides is only occurring locally at the site at which the column optical depth started to rise, and not at the other site. This indicates that the extent of the storm has to become large enough for the global modification of the thermal tide to be effective. 18 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 13: Data plotted in each panel of this figure are for 7 sols centered on either sol-of-year 400 (Ls ∼ [196◦, upper panels) or sol-of-year 418 (Ls ∼ [207◦, lower panels) in Aonia Terra (longitude=[90◦W, 60◦W], latitude=[60◦S, 30◦S). Blue indicate nightside data, red is for dayside data. The left panels of this figure shows the MCS CDOD in extinction at 21.6 µm (not normalized to 610 Pa) as a function of the cut-off altitudes of their corresponding dust opacity profiles, which are plotted in the central panels as a function of altitude above local surface, and in the right panels as a function of altitude above the areoid (topography values are interpolated from the MOLA dataset at the corresponding longitudes and latitudes). Note that the x-axis and y-axis ranges are different among the panels. The increase in column dust optical depth associated with the MY 34 GDE has a profound impact on the large-scale circulation. Lewis and Read (2003) evidenced an equatorial low-troposphere super-rotating jet in the atmosphere of Mars, and emphasized the strong positive impact of the atmospheric dust loading on this jet. Our LMD-MGCM forced simulation for MY 34 shows that the intensity of this super-rotating jet (diagnosed by the super-rotating index as in Lewis and Read, 2003) is indeed increased following the onset of the GDE from a 5% super-rotation index to a 15% super-rotation index. We also find that this jet is becoming more confined close to the surface as the GDE develops (Figure 17 top). The mean meridional circulation is also deeply impacted by the large dust loading following the onset 19 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 14: Comparison of surface temperature simulated by the LMD-MGCM model versus surface temperature measured by the Rover Environmental Monitoring Station on board MSL "Curiosity" rover (daily minimum in blue and daily maximum in red). Data from MSL are provided as supplementary material of Guzewich et al. (2018) Figure 15: Daily cycle of surface pressure as simulated by the LMD Mars GCM using the MY 25 and MY 34 dust scenarios. The focus of the figure corresponds to the onset of the two GDEs. This is showing the simulated fields at the Opportunity (left) and Curiosity (right) landing sites. of the MY 34 GDE: the intensity of this mean meridional circulation is enhanced by a factor of 10 following the onset and mature phase of the GDE (Figure 17 bottom). This behaviour is similar to the evolution of the mean meridional circulation simulated under MY 25 GDE conditions (e.g., Montabone et al., 2005). Finally, we discuss the use of a "free dust" simulation to get some insights on the daily variability of CDOD in the GCM model. GCM simulations have already proved successful to show that large-scale circulation components (i.e. the mean meridional circulation, planetary waves, and the polar vortex) cause the vertical distribution of dust to undergo diurnal variations both in equatorial and extratropical regions [Kleinböhl et al., this issue]. Figure 18 shows the column dust optical depth simulated in a LMD-MGCM run around Ls = 210◦ (i.e. near the peak of the MY 34 storm). The total column optical depth freely evolves in the simulation without being re-normalized using the values in the MY 34 dust scenario. As is observed in the MCS CDOD values, and by consequence in the gridded/kriged maps reconstructed following the method described in this paper, the column optical depth in the "free dust" model run could vary significantly on a diurnal basis in a given region. This results from horizontal transport by the large-scale circulation. While it is not possible to rule out the other possible interpretations of the observed diurnal variability of column optical depth as discussed at the end of Section 3, the LMD-MGCM results in Figure 18 strongly suggests that this variability has a physical basis, and at least part of it would be related to the large-scale horizontal transport. What our GCM simulation cannot tell is how much specific mesoscale phenomena, including dusty deep convection ("rocket dust storms" Spiga et al., 2013), or Planetary Boundary Layer processes, would contribute to the stronger 20 170180190200210220230240250Ls (degrees)165180195210225240255270285300Surface temperature (K)LMD GCMMSL minMSL max180182184186188190192194196198200Ls0.00.81.62.43.24.04.85.66.47.28.0 at 610 PaMY25MY34180182184186188190192194196198200Ls0.00.81.62.43.24.04.85.66.47.28.0 at 610 PaMY25MY34180182184186188190192194196198200Ls510525540555570585600615630645Surface pressure (Pa)MY25MY34180182184186188190192194196198200Ls540555570585600615630645660675Surface pressure (Pa)MY25MY34A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 16: Planetary waves detected by a Fast Fourier transform performed on the surface pressure simulated at the equator by the LMD Martian GCM forced by the MY 34 dust scenario. The spectral analysis is carried out on two time intervals before the MY34 GDE (sol-of-year 350 to 370, left) and during the MY 34 GDE (sol-of-year 400 to 420, right). The diurnal (-1), semi-diurnal (-2) and quarter-diurnal (-4) tides are detected, as well as the Kelvin (+1) mode. The most notable change is the reinforcement of the semi-diurnal mode by the MY 34 GDE, with an enhancement of spectral power of about one order of magnitude. During the GDE, the semi-diurnal tidal mode is as strong as the diurnal tidal mode. The quarter-diurnal mode is also significantly reinforced, becoming stronger than the wavenumber-1 Kelvin mode. diurnal variability observed by MCS. It should also be pointed out that the GCM model uses a simplified scheme for dust lifting, which might not be well suited to reproduce strong day-night variability. 5 Conclusions and remarks The work described in this paper was devoted 1. to reconstruct maps of column dust optical depth for MY 34 from Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter/Mars Climate Sounder observations, 2. to analyze the seasonal, day-to-day, and daily variability of column dust showed by the maps, and 3. to use numerical simulations with the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique Mars global climate model, forced by or simply initiated with the reconstructed CDOD maps, in order to examine some aspects of the impact of the MY 34 global dust event on local and global scale dynamics, including the daily variability of column dust. The reconstructed maps for MY 34 follow the work by Montabone et al. (2015) and extend the publicly available multi-annual, multi-instrument climatology of column dust optical depth to 11 Martian years. An important difference of the present work with respect to Montabone et al. (2015) is that we have now reconstructed sub-daily maps of column dust, allowing us to access the analysis of the daily variability of such quantity. This was made possible by using novel retrievals (version 5.3.2) of dust opacity profiles from MCS observations during the period May 21, 2018, to October 15, 2018 (Ls = [179◦, 269◦] in MY 34), which extend lower in altitude than standard version 5.2 retrievals. In general, therefore, the estimated column dust optical depth values during the global dust event of MY 34 result more accurate, within the intrinsic limitations of estimating CDODs from limb observations. The analysis of the MY 34 column dust variability at different temporal scales using the reconstructed maps highlighted that: • MY 34 reproduced the dichotomy observed in the 10 previous years between the "low dust loading" and the "high dust loading" seasons (this might not be the case for the recently started MY 35, which featured an unusually intense dust storm during the LDL season, D. Kass, personal communication); • It also featured other typical characteristics of the seasonal evolution of CDOD, such as large values at southern polar latitudes peaking at Ls ∼ 270◦, a solsticial pause centered at Ls ∼ 300◦, and large values peaking again at Ls ∼ 325◦ during the evolution of an intense late-winter dust storm; 21 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 17: The impact of the MY 34 GDE on the zonally-averaged global circulations on Mars is shown from left to right, averaged on the Ls intervals [150◦, 180◦] (pre-GDE conditions), [180◦, 210◦] (onset of the GDE), and [210◦, 240◦] (mature phase of the GDE). [Top] Super-rotation index s computed according to Lewis and Read (2003) with positive values denoting regions where eastward jets are super-rotating i.e. exceeding the solid-body rotation of the planet. [Bottom] Mass streamfunction with blue regions corresponding to counterclockwise circulation and red regions corresponding to clockwise circulation. • The key distinction of MY 34 was undoubtedly the equinoctial global dust event (starting at Ls ∼ 186◦ only few sols after the equivalent event in MY 25), which seemed to feature a "storm within the storm" at Ls ∼ 197◦, boosting its growth to attain extreme characteristics, typical of GDEs; • The MY 34 GDE seems also to feature very large CDOD diurnal variability at selected locations, particularly at southern mid- and high-latitudes, as already observed in the corresponding MCS dust opacity profiles by Kleinböhl et al. [this issue]. 22 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 18: Sequence of column dust optical depth maps separated by 3 hours over two sols in a LMD-MGCM "free dust" simulation where, contrary to the simulation forced with the MY 34 dust scenario, the dust mass mixing ratio in the model is not normalized to match the total column dust optical depth in the MY 34 dust scenario. This "free dust" simulation was restarted from the simulated state of the atmosphere at Ls = 210◦ in a regular LMD-MGCM simulation forced by the MY 34 dust scenario. 23 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 While the observation of the diurnal variability in dust opacity profiles comes from direct MCS retrievals, and could be explained by global climate model simulations invoking the effects of the large-scale circulation [Kleinböhl et al., this issue], the same observation in the indirectly estimated column dust values poses more challenging questions. Is the daily variability intrinsic to the column dust, or should we expect that the shape of the dust profile in the lowest one or two scale heights not directly observed by MCS (particularly in dayside observations) is not compatible with an homogeneously mixed assumption? Whether the answer leans towards the former or the latter, or a bit of both, it would open a novel view of how dust is three-dimensionally distributed within Martian dust storms. It is not the purpose of this paper to provide a definite answer to the aforementioned question. Nevertheless, we have resorted to numerical simulations with the LMD-MGCM to provide us with some hints. Using a "free dust" model run initiated at Ls=210◦ with the reconstructed CDOD field, the model is able to reproduce some daily variability in column dust at selected locations. Despite the fact that both the range of the variability and the precise locations do not coincide with what is estimated from MCS, this result provides a physical evidence that some degree of daily variability can be expected not only in the dust profiles but also in the integrated columns. Furthermore, the dust lifting and planetary boundary layer parameterizations of the global model might actually miss some of the important features that lead to an accurate description of the three-dimensional dust distribution. The model result might, therefore, underestimate the real variability of the column dust. What the model simulations clearly show when forced with daily averaged CDOD maps, however, is that the impact of the MY 34 GDE on the atmospheric dynamics is as large as for the MY 25 GDE. Key features of the local and global dynamics (such as tides, mean meridional circulation, and equatorial winds) respond to the equinoctial dust events in a very similar manner. This is also an indirect validation of the MY 34 reference dust scenario based on the daily averaged CDOD maps from MCS, which is currently used in several modeling studies of the 2018 GDE. Future work should address the possibility of producing and making available a sub-daily dust scenario. As mentioned in Subsection 2.5, we consider that this option was not currently viable, mainly because the CDOD daily variability is not yet independently confirmed, and because it is not yet clear whether model simulations forced by a sub-daily dust scenario are free of spurious effects. Current Mars GCMs might need to be adapted to handle diurnally varying CDODs in a stable and sensible fashion, if the degree of variability will be proved to be of the order of the one showed in this paper. Strong emphasis should also be put in obtaining future observations of column-integrated dust as well as dust profiles with sub-daily frequency. The Planetary Fourier Spectrometer (PFS) aboard Mars Express, and the Atmospheric Chemistry Suite (ACS) aboard Trace Gas Orbiter currently provide the capability to retrieve CDOD at multiple local times, and could help in the comparison with the estimated MCS day-night variability of column dust. Future observations from the forthcoming Emirates Mars Mission (EMM) might provide even stronger evidence of the presence or absence of daily variability. Moreover, in order to fully characterize the diurnal cycle of dust and accurately monitor the evolution of dust storms on Mars, novel approaches must be taken in the future. These include: • the use of satellites in Mars-stationary orbits (also called "areostationary"), which are equatorial, circular, planet-synchronous orbits equivalent to geostationary ones for the Earth (see e.g. Montabone et al., 2018, ;) • the use of instruments that allow to observe the vertical distribution of the dust in the Martian PBL, such as lidars. This is particularly important during dust storms when IR spectrometers/radiometers (both nadir- and limb-looking) fail to produce reliable retrievals because of the large atmospheric opacity and the reduced temperature contrast. A Appendix: MY 34 climatology versioning MCS version 5.3.2 is an interim, experimental version of retrievals, leading to a possible future improved version of the whole MCS dataset. As a consequence, the MY 34 gridded and kriged datasets should be considered work in progress, as should the datasets related to other Martian years. It is our intention to regularly update the multi- annual, multi-instrument dust climatology with new observations, novel retrievals of past observations, and updated gridding methodologies/features. The updates are likely to be made publicly available on the Mars Climate Database project webpage at the URL http://www-mars.lmd.jussieu.fr/. There exist, therefore, multiple versions of these reference dust climatologies, notably for MY 34, and we would like to provide in this appendix some details about the main differences. As mentioned in Section 2, the reference version of the current maps from MY 24 to 32 is v2.0. For this version, the used gridding/kriging methodology is precisely the one described in Montabone et al. (2015). Version 2.1 is a 24 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 specific version only for MY 33, where we have used a different weight for THEMIS observations with respect to MCS observations, in order to account for THEMIS retrievals provided at later local times, and we started using MCS v5.2 "two-dimensional" retrievals (Kleinböhl et al., 2017a) instead of v4.3 "one-dimensional" retrievals for previous years 28 to 32. For MY 34, we have produced three intermediate versions (v2.2, v2.3, and v2.4) and the v2.5 described in this paper, which should be considered as the reference version. All three intermediate versions use MCS v5.3.2 retrievals for the available period, and MCS v5.2 for the rest of the time, but do not use the two distinctive features described in Subsection 2.4, namely the local time cut-off window of ±7 hours for observations considered for the weighted average at each grid point, and the 6 hour moving average producing 4 maps per sol. Instead, they use observations at all local times for each grid point (except in v2.3 and v2.4 during the GDE, see below), and the 24 h moving average produces only one map per sol, centered at MUT=12:00, as described in Montabone et al. (2015). Within the intermediate versions, the differences are as following: • v2.2: This version still uses the same data QC and gridding methodology as in Montabone et al. (2015). The use of dayside values is limited by the application of the "dayside" filter with 8 km cut-off altitude threshold at any time. Apart the use of MCS v5.3.2 retrievals, the only other difference with respect to v2.0 is in the kriged maps, where we have artificially introduced climatological south cap edge "storms" only for solar longitude earlier than 180◦, as in MY 25. This version also uses MCS observations only until end of September 2018 (Ls ∼ 260◦), stopping at SOY 501. • v2.3: This version uses only dayside values during the GDE (186.5◦ < Ls < 269◦, SOY 383 to 515). It has also an improved data QC with respect to v2.2: we introduced the "water ice" filter, the "cross-track" filter, and we did not apply the "dayside filter" with 8 km cut-off altitude threshold during the GDE and the late winter regional storm (Ls > 312◦). This allowed to use many more dayside values during the two major dust events of MY 34, increasing the overall optical depth to levels observed by, e.g., Opportunity rover. We also redefined the estimation of uncertainties according to the scheme that was later adopted in v2.5 (but with slightly lower uncertainties overall). Furthermore, we changed a couple of parameters in the IWB methodology: the criterion to accept a value of weighted average at a particular grid point at any given iteration became that there must be at least one observation within a distance of 200 km from the grid point. We started using the same surface pressure recorded in the MCS dataset to renormalize CDOD to 610 Pa, instead of the MCD surface pressure. If MCS surface pressure is not retrieved, we associated a 10% uncertainty by default. We stopped using the artificial modification of a latitude band around the southern polar cap at all times. This version also uses MCS observations only until end of February 2018 (Ls ∼ 349◦), stopping at SOY 647. • v2.4: This version is quite similar to v2.3. The only differences are in the refined data QC, which is the one we also use in v2.5 (see Subsection 2.2). It also extends until the end of MY 34. Refer to Figures 19 and 20 for a comparison of results using versions 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5. Acknowledgments The work related to the production of reconstructed gridded and kriged CDOD maps for MY 34 is funded by the French Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES). This work uses technical achievements and expertise obtained during a parallel project of improving the gridding of column dust optical depth retrievals from satellite observations, funded by NASA PDART programme (Grant no. NNX15AN06G). The maps of gridded and kriged CDOD produced in this work will be publicly available under the Mars Climate Database project (at the URL http://www-mars.lmd.jussieu.fr/) after the version of this manuscript submitted to the Journal of Geophysical Research - Planets is accepted for publication. A beta version of these maps is currently available upon request to the corresponding author ([email protected]). Mars Climate Sounder data is publicly available on NASA's Planetary Data System (https://pds-atmospheres.nmsu.edu/). Work related to MCS observations and retrievals (including the estimates of CDOD) is carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, and is performed under a contract with NASA. Government sponsorship is acknowledged. Data from Curiosity rover obtained by the Rover Environmental Monitoring Station (REMS) instrument is publicly available as supplementary material of Guzewich et al. (2018). The authors wish to thank R. John Wilson for useful comments on early versions of the reference MY 34 dust climatology datasets. Luca Montabone wishes to dedicate this work to his father Augusto, who started his journey to the stars during the production of this paper. 25 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 References B. A. Cantor. MOC observations of the 2001 Mars planet-encircling dust storm. Icarus, 186:60 -- 96, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.08.019. S. Chapman and R. Lindzen. Atmospheric tides. Thermal and gravitational. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1970, 1970. A. Colaïtis, A. Spiga, F. Hourdin, C. Rio, F. Forget, and E. Millour. A thermal plume model for the Martian convective boundary layer. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 118:1468 -- 1487, 2013. doi: 10.1002/jgre.20104. A. Fedorova, J.-L. Bertaux, D. Betsis, F. Montmessin, O. Korablev, L. Maltagliati, and J. Clarke. Water vapor in the middle atmosphere of Mars during the 2007 global dust storm. Icarus, 300:440 -- 457, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus. 2017.09.025. F. Forget, A. Spiga, B. Dolla, S. Vinatier, R. Melchiorri, P. Drossart, A. Gendrin, J.-P. Bibring, Y. Langevin, and B. Gondet. Remote sensing of surface pressure on Mars with the Mars Express/OMEGA spectrometer: 1. Retrieval method. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 112(E11):8 -- +, 2007. doi: 10.1029/2006JE002871. F. González-Galindo, A. Määttänen, F. Forget, and A. Spiga. The martian mesosphere as revealed by co2 clouds observations and general circulation modeling. Icarus, 216:10 -- 22, 2011. Scott D. Guzewich, M. Lemmon, C. L. Smith, G. Martínez, A. de Vicente-Retortillo, C. E. Newman, M. Baker, C. Campbell, B. Cooper, J. Gómez-Elvira, A.-M. Harri, D. Hassler, F. J. Martin-Torres, T. McConnochie, J. E. Moores, H. Kahanpää, A. Khayat, M. I. Richardson, M. D. Smith, R. Sullivan, M. de la Torre Juarez, A. R. Vasavada, D. Viúdez-Moreiras, C. Zeitlin, and Maria-Paz Zorzano Mier. Mars science laboratory observations of the 2018/mars year 34 global dust storm. Geophysical Research Letters, 0(ja), 2018. doi: 10.1029/2018GL080839. URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018GL080839. N. G. Heavens, A. Kleinböhl, M. S. Chaffin, J. S. Halekas, D. M. Kass, P. O. Hayne, D. J. McCleese, S. Piqueux, J. H. Shirley, and J. T. Schofield. Hydrogen escape from Mars enhanced by deep convection in dust storms. Nature Astronomy, 2:126 -- 132, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0353-4. Melinda A. Kahre, James R. Murphy, Claire E. Newman, R. John Wilson, Bruce A. Cantor, Mark T. Lemmon, and Michael J. Wolff. The Mars Dust Cycle, pages 229 -- 294. 2017. doi: 10.1017/9781139060172.010. D. M. Kass, A. Kleinböhl, D. J. McCleese, J. T. Schofield, and M. D. Smith. Interannual similarity in the Martian atmosphere during the dust storm season. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(12):6111 -- 6118, Jun 2016. doi: 10.1002/2016GL068978. A. Kleinböhl, J. T. Schofield, D. M. Kass, W. A. Abdou, C. R. Backus, B. Sen, J. H. Shirley, W. G. Lawson, M. I. Richardson, F. W. Taylor, N. A. Teanby, and D. J. McCleese. Mars Climate Sounder limb profile retrieval of atmospheric temperature, pressure, and dust and water ice opacity. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 114: E10006, October 2009. doi: 10.1029/2009JE003358. A. Kleinböhl, J. T. Schofield, W. A. Abdou, P. G. J. Irwin, and R. J. de Kok. A single-scattering approximation for infrared radiative transfer in limb geometry in the Martian atmosphere. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Rad. Transfer, 112: 1568 -- 1580, 2011. A. Kleinböhl, L. Chen, and J. T. Schofield. Far Infrared Spectroscopic Parameters of Mars Atmospheric Aerosols and their Application to MCS Retrievals in High Aerosol Conditions. In F. Forget and M. Millour, editors, The Mars Atmosphere: Modelling and observation, page 2230, January 2017b. Armin Kleinböhl, R. John Wilson, David Kass, John T. Schofield, and Daniel J. McCleese. The semidiurnal tide in the middle atmosphere of Mars. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(10):1952 -- 1959, May 2013. doi: 10.1002/grl.50497. A. Kleinböhl, A. J. Friedson, and J. T. Schofield. Two-dimensional radiative transfer for the retrieval of limb emission measurements in the martian atmosphere. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 187:511 -- 522, 2017a. ISSN 0022-4073. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.07.009. URL http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0022407316302667. J. S. Levine, D. Winterhalter, and R. L. Kerschmann. Dust in the Atmosphere of Mars and its Impact on Human Exploration. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, UK, 2018. S. R. Lewis and P. R. Barker. Atmospheric tides in a Mars general circulation model with data assimilation. Advances in Space Research, 36:2162 -- 2168, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.05.122. S. R. Lewis and P. L. Read. Equatorial jets in the dusty Martian atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 108:5034 -- +, 2003. doi: 10.1029/2002JE001933. S. R. Lewis, D. P. Mulholland, P. L. Read, L. Montabone, R. J. Wilson, and M. D. Smith. The solsticial pause on Mars: 1. A planetary wave reanalysis. Icarus, 264:456 -- 464, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.039. 26 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 J.-B. Madeleine, F. Forget, E. Millour, L. Montabone, and M. J. Wolff. Revisiting the radiative impact of dust on Mars using the LMD Global Climate Model. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 116:E11010, November 2011. doi: 10.1029/2011JE003855. J.-B. Madeleine, F. Forget, E. Millour, T. Navarro, and A. Spiga. The influence of radiatively active water ice clouds on the Martian climate. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39:L23202, 2012. doi: 10.1029/2012GL053564. M. C. Malin, B. A. Cantor, and Britton A. W. Mro marci weather report for the week of 4 june 2018 -- 10 june 2018. Malin Space Science Systems Captioned Image Release, MSSS-534, http://www.msss.com/msss_images/ 2018/06/13/, 2018. Leonard J. Martin and Richard W. Zurek. An analysis of the history of dust activity on Mars. J. Geophys. Res., 98(E2): 3221 -- 3246, 1993. D. J. McCleese, J. T. Schofield, F. W. Taylor, S. B. Calcutt, M. C. Foote, D. M. Kass, C. B. Leovy, D. A. Paige, P. L. Read, and R. W. Zurek. Mars Climate Sounder: An investigation of thermal and water vapor structure, dust and condensate distributions in the atmosphere, and energy balance of the polar regions. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 112(E11):5 -- +, 2007. doi: 10.1029/2006JE002790. E. Millour, F. Forget, A. Spiga, T. Navarro, J.-B. Madeleine, L. Montabone, A. Pottier, F. Lefevre, F. Montmessin, J.-Y. Chaufray, M. A. Lopez-Valverde, F. Gonzalez-Galindo, S. R. Lewis, P. L. Read, J.-P. Huot, M.-C. Desjean, and MCD/GCM development Team. The Mars Climate Database (MCD version 5.2). European Planetary Science Congress 2015, 10:EPSC2015 -- 438, 2015. L. Montabone and F. Forget. Forecasting Dust Storms on Mars: a Short Review, page 000. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Ed. Levine, G. S. and Winterhalter, D. and Kerschmann, R. L., 2018. doi: doi_tbd. L. Montabone, S. R. Lewis, and P. L. Read. Interannual variability of Martian dust storms in assimilation of several years of Mars global surveyor observations. Advances in Space Research, 36:2146 -- 2155, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.asr. 2005.07.047. L. Montabone, F. Forget, E. Millour, R. J. Wilson, S. R. Lewis, B. Cantor, D. Kass, A. Kleinböhl, M. T. Lemmon, M. D. Smith, and M. J. Wolff. Eight-year climatology of dust optical depth on Mars. Icarus, 251:65 -- 95, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.12.034. Luca Montabone, Francois Forget, Michael Smith, Bruce Cantor, Michael Wolff, Michel Capderou, and Michael VanWoerkom. Mars Aerosol Tracker (MAT): An Areostationary SmallSat to Monitor Dust Storms and Water Ice Clouds. In 42nd COSPAR Scientific Assembly, volume 42, pages B0.2 -- 16 -- 18, Jul 2018. D. P. Mulholland, P. L. Read, and S. R. Lewis. Simulating the interannual variability of major dust storms on Mars using variable lifting thresholds. Icarus, 223:344 -- 358, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.12.003. T. Navarro, J.-B. Madeleine, F. Forget, A. Spiga, E. Millour, F. Montmessin, and A. Määttänen. Global Climate Modeling of the Martian water cycle with improved microphysics and radiatively active water ice clouds. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 2014. doi: 10.1002/2013JE004550. J. A. Ryan and R. M. Henry. Mars atmospheric phenomena during major dust storms as measured at surface. J. Geophys. Res., 84:2821 -- 2829, 1979. A. Spiga, J. Faure, J.-B. Madeleine, A. Määttänen, and F. Forget. Rocket dust storms and detached dust layers in the Martian atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 118:746 -- 767, April 2013. doi: 10.1002/jgre.20046. A. Spiga, D. Banfield, N. A. Teanby, F. Forget, A. Lucas, B. Kenda, J. A. Rodriguez Manfredi, R. Widmer-Schnidrig, N. Murdoch, M. T. Lemmon, R. F. Garcia, L. Martire, Ö. Karatekin, S. Le Maistre, B. Van Hove, V. Dehant, P. Lognonné, N. Mueller, R. Lorenz, D. Mimoun, S. Rodriguez, É. Beucler, I. Daubar, M. P. Golombek, T. Bertrand, Y. Nishikawa, E. Millour, L. Rolland, Q. Brissaud, T. Kawamura, A. Mocquet, R. Martin, J. Clinton, É. Stutzmann, T. Spohn, S. Smrekar, and W. B. Banerdt. Atmospheric Science with InSight. Space Science Reviews, 214:109, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s11214-018-0543-0. P. M. Streeter, S. R. Lewis, M. R. Patell, J. A. Holmes, and D. M. Kass. Surface Warming During the 2018/MY 34 Mars Global Dust Storm. In Ninth International Conference on Mars 2019(LPIContrib.No.2089), page 6242, 2019. A. Sánchez-Lavega, T. del Río-Gaztelurrutia, J. Hernández-Bernal, and M. Delcroix. The onset and growth of the 2018 martian global dust storm. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(11):6101 -- 6108, 2019. doi: 10.1029/2019GL083207. URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2019GL083207. M. Vincendon, J. Audouard, F. Altieri, and A. Ody. Mars Express measurements of surface albedo changes over 2004-2010. Icarus, 251:145 -- 163, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.10.029. 27 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 C. Wang, F. Forget, T. Bertrand, A. Spiga, E. Millour, and T. Navarro. Parameterization of Rocket Dust Storms on Mars in the LMD Martian GCM: Modeling Details and Validation. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 123: 982 -- 1000, 2018. doi: 10.1002/2017JE005255. R. W. Wilson and K. Hamilton. Comprehensive model simulation of thermal tides in the Martian atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 53:1290 -- 1326, 1996. Paul Withers. Empirical Estimates of Martian Surface Pressure in Support of the Landing of Mars Science Laboratory. Space Science Reviews, 170(1-4):837 -- 860, Sep 2012. doi: 10.1007/s11214-012-9876-2. R. W. Zurek. Martian great dust storm, an update. Icarus, 50:288 -- 310, 1982. Richard W. Zurek and Leonard J. Martin. Interannual variability of planet-encircling dust storms on Mars. J. Geo- phys. Res., 98(E2):3247 -- 3259, 1993. 28 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 19: Different versions of the gridded maps of 9.3 µm absorption column dust optical depth for SOY 400, Ls ∼ 196◦, in the growing phase of the Global Dust Event of MY 34. V2.2 is the top left map, v2.3 is the top right one, v2.4 is the bottom left one, and the reference v2.5 is the bottom right one. The spatial resolution of all gridded maps is 6◦ longitude × 5◦ latitude. 29 A PREPRINT - JULY 19, 2019 Figure 20: Time series of equivalent visible column dust optical depth calculated from the 9.3 µm absorption CDOD normalized to 610 Pa, extracted from different versions of the gridded maps in an area around Gale crater, compared to the time series of visible column optical depth measured by MastCAM aboard NASA's "Curiosity" rover (black line). Curiosity observations [Guzevich et al., 2018, see main text] have been daily averaged and normalized to 610 Pa (using the surface pressure from the Mars Climate Database pres0 routine). Both time series are shown between Sol-of-Year 355 and 500, i.e. Ls ∼ [170◦, 260◦]. We used a factor of 2.6 to convert 9.3 µm absorption CDOD into equivalent visible ones. Data from gridded maps are averaged in longitude=[123◦E, 153◦E], latitude=[15◦S, 10◦N] centered around Curiosity landing site at longitude 137.4◦E and latitude 4.6◦S. 30
1105.0045	1	1105	2011-04-30T04:41:14	The Photoevaporative Wind from the Disk of TW Hya	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Photoevaporation driven by the central star is expected to be a ubiquitous and important mechanism to disperse the circumstellar dust and gas from which planets form. Here, we present a detailed study of the circumstellar disk surrounding the nearby star TW Hya and provide observational constraints to its photoevaporative wind. Our new high-resolution (R ~ 30,000) mid-infrared spectroscopy in the [Ne II] 12.81 {\mu}m line confirms that this gas diagnostic traces the unbound wind component within 10AU from the star. From the blueshift and asymmetry in the line profile, we estimate that most (>80%) of the [Ne II] emission arises from disk radii where the midplane is optically thick to the redshifted outflowing gas, meaning beyond the 1 or 4AU dust rim inferred from other observations. We re-analyze high-resolution (R ~ 48, 000) archival optical spectra searching for additional transitions that may trace the photoevaporative flow. Unlike the [Ne II] line, optical forbidden lines from OI, SII, and MgI are centered at the stellar velocity and have symmetric profiles. The only way these lines could trace the photoevaporative flow is if they arise from a disk region physically distinct from that traced by the [Ne II] line, specifically from within the optically thin dust gap. However, the small (~10 km/s) FWHM of these lines suggest that most of the emitting gas traced at optical wavelengths is bound to the system rather than unbound. We discuss the implications of our results for a planet-induced versus a photoevaporation-induced gap.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The Photoevaporative Wind from the Disk of TW Hya Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA I. Pascucci1 [email protected] M. Sterzik European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, R. D. Alexander LE1 7RH, UK S. H. P. Alencar Departamento de Fisica - ICEx UFMG, MG, Brazil SETI Institute, 189 Bernardo Ave., Mountain View, CA 94043, USA U. Gorti2 D. Hollenbach SETI Institute, 189 Bernardo Ave., Mountain View, CA 94043, USA J. Owen Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA B. Ercolano University Observatory Munich, D-81679, Munich, Germany 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA -- 2 -- S. Edwards Astronomy Department, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063 USA Received ; accepted ⋆Based on observations made with VISIR on the UT3/Melipal ESO Telescope at Paranal under programme ID 084.C-0088(A) -- 3 -- ABSTRACT Photoevaporation driven by the central star is expected to be a ubiquitous and important mechanism to disperse the circumstellar dust and gas from which planets form. Here, we present a detailed study of the circumstellar disk sur- rounding the nearby star TW Hya and provide observational constraints to its photoevaporative wind. Our new high-resolution (R ∼ 30, 000) mid-infrared spectroscopy in the [Ne ii] 12.81 µm line confirms that this gas diagnostic traces the unbound wind component within 10 AU from the star. From the blueshift and asymmetry in the line profile, we estimate that most (>80%) of the [Ne ii] emission arises from disk radii where the midplane is optically thick to the red- shifted outflowing gas, meaning beyond the 1 or 4 AU dust rim inferred from other observations. We re-analyze high-resolution (R ∼ 48, 000) archival optical spectra searching for additional transitions that may trace the photoevaporative flow. Unlike the [Ne ii] line, optical forbidden lines from OI, SII, and MgI are centered at the stellar velocity and have symmetric profiles. The only way these lines could trace the photoevaporative flow is if they arise from a disk region physically distinct from that traced by the [Ne ii] line, specifically from within the optically thin dust gap. However, the small (∼10 km/s) FWHM of these lines suggest that most of the emitting gas traced at optical wavelengths is bound to the system rather than unbound. We discuss the implications of our results for a planet-induced versus a photoevaporation-induced gap. Subject headings: accretion, accretion disks -- infrared: stars -- planetary systems: protoplanetary disks -- stars: individual (TW Hya) -- 4 -- 1. Introduction One of the yet unsolved questions in planet formation is how young stars lose their disks. Planet formation certainly contributes to the clearing of primordial disk material. Its first steps, the coagulation of sub-micron sized grains and their subsequent settling to the disk midplane, have been identified toward many protoplanetary disks (e.g., Natta et al. 2007 for a review). However, planet formation is likely not the major disk dispersal mechanism, as evinced by the small total mass in the planets (both in our solar system and in other planetary systems) when compared to the mass of protoplanetary disks (e.g., Hayashi et al. 1985). Furthermore, a disk dispersal mechanism based only on planet formation would require shorter dispersal timescales in high metallicity environments (Ercolano & Clarke 2010), which is not supported by recent observations of disk fractions in low metallicity clusters of the extreme outer Galaxy (Yasui et al. 2009). Current models of protoplanetary disk evolution suggest that viscous evolution (accretion of gas onto the central star) and photoevaporation driven by the central star (heating of disk gas to thermal escape velocities) are the main disk dispersal mechanisms (e.g., Hollenbach et al. 2000; Gorti et al. 2009; Owen et al. 2010). Indeed, there is abundant observational evidence that young stars are accreting disk gas: from the optical and ultraviolet excess continuum emission arising from the accretion shock (e.g., Calvet et al. 2000) to the broad permitted emission lines from infalling gas (e.g., Muzerolle et al. 1998). Measurements of mass accretion rates using these diagnostics are now available for hundreds of stars in nearby star-forming regions and qualitatively follow the time evolution predicted by these models (Hartmann et al. 1998; Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2010). However, at least two other observables are not reproduced by models of viscously evolving disks. First, the disk dispersal timescale, which is measured to be of just a few Myr, is predicted to be too long using the viscosity inferred from mass accretion rate measurements. Both optically thick -- 5 -- dust disks as well as gaseous disks should be numerous and detectable around stars that are ∼10 Myr-old, which contrasts with observations (e.g., Pascucci & Tachibana 2010). Second, the transition from disk-bearing to disk-less stars is observed to be quick (just ∼105 years), too quick to be explained by viscous evolution alone (see e.g., Armitage 2010 for a review). These observables led theorists to propose photoevaporation driven by the central star as the next ubiquitous and most relevant mechanism to disperse protoplanetary disks (e.g., Hollenbach et al. 2000; Dullemond et al. 2007). In the first model combining the effect of accretion and photoevaporation (Clarke et al. 2001), extreme UV photons (EUV, 13.6 eV < hν ≤ 100 eV) from the central star heat and ionize the disk surface. Beyond the radius at which the sound speed of the gas equals the local Keplerian orbital speed (gravitational radius, rg), the hot gas becomes unbound and a photoevaporative wind is established. When the disk accretion rate through rg drops below the wind loss rate, photoevaporation limits the supply of gas to the inner disk, which drains onto the star on the local viscous timescale -- of order 105 years. Many theoretical developments have been made since this first model. First, Liffman (2003), Font et al. (2004), and Adams et al. (2004) have included the effects of angular momentum support and showed that photoevaporation occurs within rg and happens mostly outside ∼0.15 rg (hereafter critical radius). Second, Alexander et al. (2006a,b) showed that the direct EUV irradiation of the disk rim can drastically reduce the disk lifetime once the inner disk is cleared out. Third, Ercolano et al. (2008), and Gorti & Hollenbach (2009) have recognized that stellar Xrays and FUV photons can launch winds from denser disk regions and thus dramatically increase the wind mass-loss rate produced by EUV photons alone. Recently, several papers have discussed whether other disk properties, beyond disk lifetimes, are consistent with photoevaporation models. There is yet no consensus: Kim et al. (2009) include photoevaporation as a possible explanation for some of the -- 6 -- transition disks in their sample; Currie et al. (2009) argue that the large number of evolved dust disks at 5 Myr is inconsistent with photoevaporation; Cieza et al. (2008) find support for photoevaporation based on the lack of optically thin inner disks with detectable dust outer disks. All these studies and similar ones relied on comparing model predictions with the properties of dust disks. A more direct way to test photoevaporation is to observe the gas disk component, especially that component that is not gravitationally bound and is part of the photoevaporating flow. Following this approach, Pascucci & Sterzik (2009) have shown that the [Ne ii] line at 12.81 µm is a good diagnostic for the photoevaporative wind in some systems that have transition-like spectral energy distributions (SEDs). Such systems display small near-infrared excess emission but large mid- to far-infrared emission and are thus thought to be in the process of clearing out their primordial disk material. The most convincing case for photoevaporation is that for the almost face-on transition disk around the 10 Myr-old star TW Hya. The measured blueshift of ∼6 km/s demonstrates that there is unbound gas leaving the disk and moving toward the observer (Pascucci & Sterzik 2009). If the wind is fully ionized, the measured [Ne ii] flux translates into a mass-loss rate of ∼ 10−10M⊙/yr. However, if the wind is mostly neutral, as predicted by models of Xray photoevaporation1, then the [Ne ii] emission is a trace component of the wind and the observed line strength and profile imply a much larger wind rate up to ∼ 10−8M⊙/yr (Ercolano & Owen 2010). We also note that this relatively old star is still accreting disk gas at a rate that is about an oder of magnitude lower than that of classical T Tauri stars (∼10−9 M⊙/yr, Muzerolle et al. 2000 and Alencar & Batalha 2002). 1Gorti & Hollenbach (2009) point out that Xrays alone cannot drive a strong wind but it is rather the combination of FUV photons (which dissociate the molecules and thereby reduce the ability of the disk gas to cool) and Xrays (which heat the gas) that drive the wind -- 7 -- Being at only 51 pc (Mamajek 2005) and clearly presenting evidence for photoevap- oration, TW Hya is the ideal target to provide additional observational constraints to models of disk photoevaporation and to help determine wind mass-loss rates. In this paper we present new observations of the [Ne ii] 12.81 µm line toward TW Hya and employ the spectroastrometry technique to estimate the radii traced by the ionized wind component. We also analyze archival optical spectra to search for the neutral disk wind component predicted by Xray-driven photoevaporation models. We discuss the implications of our results on the gas distribution in the inner disk of TW Hya and speculate on how that structure might link to planet formation and photoevaporation. 2. Photoevaporative disk wind models Before presenting our observations and analyzing the infrared and optical spectra, we wish to briefly summarize the main features of photoevaporative disk wind models and point out their major differences. Our goal is to clarify what observables can be used to characterize the structure and extension of the wind based on model predictions. There are basically three main sources of ionization and heating of the disk surface: Xrays (0.1 keV < hν < 10 keV), EUV (13.6 eV < hν < 0.1 keV), and FUV (6 eV < hν < 13.6 eV) photons. The first and simplest models assumed that photoevaporation is driven solely by stellar EUV photons. These photons ionize the hydrogen in the very upper layers of the disk and heat it to a temperature of ∼104 K, independent of radius, thus creating a kind of coronal H II region (Hollenbach et al. 1994, Alexander et al. 2006a,b). This fully ionized layer will produce forbidden lines at infrared and optical wavelengths whose relative intensities depend on the intensity and the spectral energy distribution of the EUV field impinging on the disk (Hollenbach & Gorti 2009), which is not constrained observationally. Assuming plausible stellar ionizing fluxes of ∼ 1041 photons/s and a solar abundance of the -- 8 -- elements, EUV-only models predict a relatively strong [Ne ii] emission line at 12.81 µm (Alexander 2008, Hollenbach & Gorti 2009) and similarly strong [S II] lines at 6731 and 6716 A and [N II] lines at 6583 A (Font et al. 2004). Because the fraction of neutral gas is very low in the EUV layer, forbidden lines from atomic species, such as the [O I] line at 6300 A, are expected to be weak (Font et al. 2004, Hollenbach & Gorti 2009). The most recent developments of the EUV-only models include a detailed treatment of the flow structure and predict line profiles from the wind in addition to line intensities (Alexander 2008). As we will show in Sect. 4.4.1, these simple models can also produce channel maps at specific emission lines that can be used to constrain the spatial distribution of the wind. More comprehensive models, such as those developed by Ercolano et al. and Gorti & Hollenbach, include other sources of disk heating and ionization in addition to stellar EUV photons. Specifically, the most recent development of the Ercolano et al. models includes Xray and EUV heating and ionization of the atomic disk gas and a 2D hydrodynamic calculation wich allows predicting line intensities and profiles from a variety of forbidden and semi-permitted transitions in the wind (Ercolano & Owen 2010). Hereafter, we will call these models X-EUV models. Gorti & Hollenbach (2009) include all three main heating and ionization sources and a detailed treatment of molecular cooling in their thermal balance calculations. For this more complex model, which we will call XE-FUV model, hydrodynamical calculations have not been perfomed yet hence we will limit the comparison between model and observations to line intensities. The X-EUV and XE-FUV models further differ in their assumptions of the stellar Xray and EUV spectra and therefore also in the predicted mass-flow rates. Regardless of these differences, the inclusion of Xray and FUV heating results in a predominantly denser, but cooler (hence mainly neutral), photoevaporative wind compared to the EUV-only models and the mass loss rates are higher by one (XE-FUV) or two (X-EUV) orders of magnitude. Depending on the star/disk parameters, the [OI] emission line at 6300 A, whose low-velocity component is always -- 9 -- detected toward accreting T Tauri stars (Hartigan et al. 1995), may trace the neutral component of the disk wind (Ercolano & Owen 2010). Other forbidden lines that are expected to be strong in the Xray ionized wind are the [Ne ii] line at 12.81 µm (Hollenbach & Gorti 2009, Ercolano & Owen 2010) and the [S II] lines at 6731 and 6716 A (Ercolano & Owen 2010). We will now analyze our mid-infrared and optical spectra focusing on gas lines that could trace the ionized and neutral components of the disk wind. 3. New mid-infrared observations and data reduction Our first VLT/VISIR observations have shown that the [Ne ii] 12.81µm emission from TW Hya traces unbound gas moving toward the observer, likely in a photoevaporative disk wind (Pascucci & Sterzik 2009). We performed additional long-slit high-resolution spectroscopy with VISIR (Lagage et al. 2004) on 23-24 February 2010 attempting to detect the photoevaporative flow at a resolution better than the instrument resolving power (∼ 400 mas or 20 AU at the distance of TW Hya). To reach this goal we have applied the so-called spectro-astrometric technique (e.g., Whelan & Garcia 2008) and acquired spectra at four different slit orientations (position angle PA = 0, 270, 333, 63◦) interleaved by four antiparallel orientations, i.e. where the slit is rotated by 180◦ (position angle PA = 180, 90, 153, 243◦), see Table 1. PAs 0◦ and 180◦ correspond to N-S slit orientations on the sky, 270◦ and 90◦ to W-E while the other two couples of PAs were chosen to cover the PA of the disk of TW Hya (i.e. the angle between N and the major axis of the disk measured E of N, see Table 2) and a direction perpendicular to it. As in past observations, we used a slit width of 0.′′4 which provides a resolution of R∼30,000 or ∼10 km/s in velocity scale at ∼12.8µm (Kaufl 2006; Pascucci & Sterzik 2009). -- 10 -- Before each spectroscopic integration we acquired TW Hya with the PAH2-NEII filter to accurately position the source in the slit. Fig. 1 shows the difference in pixels between the location of the target and the slit center in cross-dispersion direction, i.e. perpendicular to the slit length. The FWHM of the slit (∼ 3 pixels) is also overplotted. Except for PA=63◦, TW Hya was positioned within half of the slit FWHM from the slit center. We note, however, that for this specific PA the emission is also the faintest, hence the error in the source location is the largest (dashed line in Fig. 1). The source faintness could be due to flux loss caused by the imperfect centering. We applied the standard chopping/nodding technique with a throw of 8′′ along the slit to suppress the mid-infrared background. Based on our previous experience, we set the on-source exposure time to 1 h for each slit orientation. For all PAs in the first night and for the first PA in the second night we also observed a standard star immediately before or after the TW Hya spectroscopic exposure and with the same slit PA to correct the spectra for telluric absorption and to obtain an absolute flux calibration. A summary of the observations is presented in Table 1. Each spectroscopic exposure has been reduced as described in Pascucci & Sterzik (2009) using the VISIR pipeline version 3.2.2 (Lundin 2008). In brief, images are first corrected by fluctuations in the background using the off-source chop and nod exposures. In parallel, a reference frame of the infrared background is also created. Next, images are corrected for the optical distortion, and are shifted and added to form a final combined image from which the spectrum is extracted following the optimal extraction method by Horne (1986). Finally, the spectrum is wavelength calibrated by cross correlating the background frame spectrum to a synthetic model spectrum of the atmosphere in the observed wavelength range (note that the resulting wavelengths are in vacuum). To remove telluric features we have used ATRAN model atmospheres for different -- 11 -- elevations and amounts of precipitable water as follows. We normalized each spectrum of TW Hya to the continuum, such that the continuum is 1, and scaled the model atmospheres to minimize (in a χ2 statistics) the difference between the observations and the model in regions where there are strong atmospheric absorption features (the strongest one is from CO2 around 12.812 µm). During the minimization we took into account the flux uncertainty at each wavelength and also allowed for a small shift of ±1 pixel in wavelength to find the best scaled/shifted atmospheric model that matches the continuum of TW Hya. Since in the first night we also acquired standard stars immediately before or after each PA of the TW Hya spectra, we could verify that the approach described above gives identical results (within the flux uncertainties) to the more traditional approach of dividing each science spectrum by that of a flux calibrated standard star spectrum. Fig. 2 presents the five TW Hya spectra that could be flux calibrated while Table 3 summarizes the main properties of the observed [Ne ii] lines for all PAs. 3.1. Accuracy of the VISIR wavelength solution Because one of our goals is to measure small shifts in the peak of the [Ne ii] line, we performed additional tests to verify the instrument wavelength solution and investigate the relative and absolute wavelength accuracy of VISIR in the high-resolution long-slit mode. First of all, we reduced and analyzed 8 additional archival spectra from 3 different infrared-bright K4-6 III standard stars (HD 136422, HD 139127, HD 149447) observed in the same setting as TW Hya. After applying the proper heliocentric correction and shifting the spectra in the stellocentric frame, we compared the observed peak position of two photospheric absorption lines to those predicted by the MARCS model atmosphere of a K5 III star (HR 6705; the spectrum was kindly provided by L. Decin). While differences in velocities are confined within ±2 km/s it is apparent that one of the lines is typically -- 12 -- redshifted while the other is typically blueshifted. To investigate whether there could be an issue in the wavelength dispersion solution and whether errors could be larger at other wavelengths, we turned to spectra of Titan which were acquired with the same setting as TW Hya (VLT/VISIR PID 083.C-0883). Titan spectra present many unresolved lines from C2H2 and C2H6 molecules in this setting. In case of large drifts in wavelength, we might see the FWHM of unresolved lines to change across the spectrum. We measured the FWHMs of 7 unresolved emission lines in two spectra of Titan covering the full VISIR wavelength range (3 before and 4 after the [Ne ii] line in TW Hya) and found no such trend, rather we report a narrow range of FWHMs with a mean value of 10 km/s, the spectral resolution of VISIR in this setting. In addition, we compared the location of Titan lines with the rest wavelengths reported in the HITRAN database (Rothman & Gordon 2009). In the setting covered with VISIR there are seven transitions from the C2H6 molecule, 2 of which are single and can be used to measure the relative centroids to other lines through the spectrum. Fig. 3 shows that the relative uncertainty between the lines is 1 km/s, one-tenth of the spectral resolution of VISIR in this mode. However, as hinted by the test on the standard stars and as we will see on the TW Hya data (Sect. 4), the absolute accuracy reachable with VISIR is likely a factor of 2 higher (2 km/s), due to uncertainties in placing the source in the center of the slit. 4. Constraints on the wind structure from ionized and neutral species In the following we analyze our new mid-infrared high-resolution spectra with special emphasis on characterzing the [Ne ii] peak velocities and the overall line profile. We also re-analyze already published high-resolution optical spectra of TW Hya to search for additional transitions from neutral and ionized species that may trace the photoevaporative flow. The optical spectra were obtained between 1998 and 2000 with the FEROS -- 13 -- echelle spectrograph on the 1.5 m ESO telescope on La Silla at a resolution of ∼ 6 km/s (R ∼48,000). Alencar & Batalha (2002) presented an extensive analysis of the optical variability of TW Hya based on this dataset. We refer to their paper for details on the data reduction. 4.1. [Ne ii] line fluxes and peak velocities Spitzer/IRS spectra of TW Hya taken in three different years show variations of up to ∼30% in the continuum emission, as well as in the [Ne ii] flux and equivalent width (Najita et al. 2010). These differences may arise from pointing errors and/or true source variability. The VISIR spectra we acquired in this observational campaign provide additional epochs to further investigate continuum and line variability on the timescale of years as well as on the much shorter timescale of hours. For each VISIR spectrum we compute the location of [Ne ii] peak emission in the stellocentric frame (after assuming a stellar radial velocity of 12.2±0.5 km/s, Weintraub et al. 2000), the EW, and when standard stars were acquired close in time to the TW Hya spectroscopic exposures, also the line flux and continuum near the line (essentially for each PA in the first night and for the first PA in the second night). Peak positions and [Ne ii] line fluxes are calculated from gaussian fits to the observed line profiles, while EWs are computed by integrating the line flux within ±4σ of the fitted gaussian. Table 3 summarizes the main results and Fig. 2 shows line profiles for the five flux calibrated spectra. To test the hypothesis of variations due to calibration uncertainties, we search for correlations between the main properties of the [Ne ii] line and the adjacent continuum with the airmass and the location of the source in the slit. We find an anti-correlation -- 14 -- between the line flux and continuum and the source airmass (lower airmass→higher flux and continuum, see Fig. 4) suggesting that most variations in these quantities are due to flux calibration uncertainties. We do not find any correlation between these quantities and the location of the source in the slit. However, we note that the displacement of the source with respect of the center of the slit might be the cause for the lowest EW and the largest blueshift in the [Ne ii] line for PA=63◦ (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 4). Unfortunately, we do not have a standard star to flux calibrate the TW Hya spectrum at this PA but our expectation is of a reduced line flux and continuum. We also note that the highest [Ne ii] flux we measure (for PA=180◦, smallest airmass) is as high as that measured by Spitzer/IRS within the estimated errorbars. This demonstrates that the small VISIR slit recovers all the [Ne ii] emission from the disk of TW Hya implying that the emission is confined within ±10 AU from the star. [Ne ii] line EWs are less affected by differences in the airmass: for the 5 exposures at airmass < 1.3 (excluding PA=63◦) the mean EW is 46±2A. This value is slightly larger than the [Ne ii] EW from our 2008 high-resolution spectrum (Pascucci & Sterzik 2009), the same as the 2006 EW measured with Spitzer/IRS (Najita et al. 2010), and smaller by about 20 A than the 2004 and 2008 EWs measured with Spitzer/IRS and the 2007 EW measured with Gemini/Michelle by Herczeg et al. (2007). Although the sampling is sparse, the [Ne ii] EW essentially oscillates around two values (∼45 and 65 A) which suggests intrinsic variability in the [Ne ii] emission or nearby continuum on a timescale of ∼1-2 years. We also confirm the blueshift in the [Ne ii] line with respect to the radial velocity of TW Hya (see Fig. 4 second panel). The mean blueshift is -5±1 km/s in agreement with our previously reported blueshift (Pascucci & Sterzik 2009). The peak position of the [Ne ii] line is not correlated with the airmass at which the source was observed, nor with the location of the source in the slit (but see previous note for PA=63◦). The FWHM of -- 15 -- the [Ne ii] line presents the least variations with PA, is not correlated with the EW, peak position, nor with the airmass: the mean value and standard deviation for the FWHM are 16.3±0.9 km/s, or an intrinsic FWHM of 12.9±0.9 km/s after deconvolution with the instrumental FWHM of VISIR of 10 km/s. 4.2. Forbidden and semi-permitted optical lines We search the FEROS optical spectra for all the lines predicted by Font et al. (2004), Hollenbach & Gorti (2009), and Ercolano & Owen (2010) to have luminosities of a few 10−7 L⊙ or higher, thus comprising forbidden and semi-permitted transitions from OI, OII, MgI, NII, and SII. We report equivalent widths and upper limits in Table 4 for representative transitions. To search for weak lines and properly measure EWs we had to correct for the numerous photospheric absorption lines present in the optical spectra of TW Hya. We followed the approach described by Alencar & Batalha (2002) and divided the continuum normalized spectra of TW Hya with the artificially veiled and continuum normalized spectrum of GJ 1172, a K7 V star with similar v sini as TW Hya (see also Hartigan et al. 1989 for the procedure and definition of veiling). In addition, we combine all observed spectra in a median high signal-to-noise spectrum normalized to the continuum level. Optical spectra from T Tauri stars are known to have strong forbidden emission lines from [OI] at 6300, 6364, and 5577 A (Hartigan et al. 1995). TW Hya is no exception and these transitions are easily identified in all individual spectra. The strongest of all is the [OI] line at 6300 A with a median EW of 0.47 A, which was found not to vary significantly with time (Alencar & Batalha 2002). Following Hartigan et al. (1995) and assuming a mean R magnitude of 10.2, we convert this EW into a line luminosity of 10−5 L⊙. The optical spectrum of TW Hya is known to vary, the most detailed V magnitude monitoring -- 16 -- reports night-to-night variations of ∆V ≃ 0.35 (seasonal changes have smaller amplitudes, Rucinski et al. 2008). The same variations in R convert into a [OI] luminosity range of 0.8-1.6×10−5 L⊙. The 6364 A [OI] line is a factor of ∼3 weaker than the [OI] 6300 A, as expected from the ratio of the Einstein coefficients, while the 5577 A [OI] line is a factor of ∼7 weaker on average (see Table 4). These lines are also spectrally resolved with FEROS, the mean (and median) FWHM of the [O i] 6300 A is 11.5±0.4 km/s or an intrinsic line width of ∼10 km/s after deconvolution with the 6 km/s instrumental FWHM. The other weaker [OI] lines have similar FWHMs. As already reported in Alencar & Batalha (2002) the [O i] 6300A line presents only a narrow component, is centered at the stellar rest frame, and there is no indication of a blueshifted high-velocity component from jets/outflows. We use 40 spectra from Alencar & Batalha (2002) to further investigate whether there is a blueshift of just a few km/s in the [O i] peak emission2. To do that we rely not only on the absolute wavelength calibration performed previously but also compare the location of the [O i] 6300 A line with respect to other known photospheric lines. Fig. 5 shows the distribution of velocities for the [O i] 6300 A line in the stellocentric frame measured via the photospheric CaI 6439 A line (black dashed line). This histogram peaks at negative velocities but the median difference velocity is only -0.1 km/s with a standard deviation as large as 0.15 km/s. While this tiny blueshift might indicate a flow, we show in the same figure that it is almost certainly related to small differences in the dispersion solution 2We excluded the 10 spectra obtained by Alencar & Batalha (2002) in December 1998 because the terrestrial night-sky emission line at [OI] 6300A falls at +12 km/s in the stel- locentric frame thus introducing a clear bump on the red side of the [O i] line from TW Hya. For the other 40 spectra obtained in April and February the terrestrial [O i] line is blueshifted by 23 km/s and is within 1 km/s from the [O i] line of TW Hya respectively. Thus, the [O i] line profiles from TW Hya are not affected by the night-sky emission in these 40 spectra -- 17 -- between the two different echelle orders in which the [O i] 6300 A and the CaI 6363 A fall. To demonstrate this we overplot the difference between the [O i] 6300 A and the [O i] 6364 A which falls in the same order as the CaI photospheric line and should trace the same disk emission as the [O i] 6300 A line. Fig. 5 clearly shows that the two velocity distributions are identical, the median difference between the [O i] 6300 A and the [O i] 6364 A being -0.1 km/s and standard deviation being 0.16 km/s. These tests demonstrate that the [OI] optical lines are not blueshifted. In addition to the oxygen lines, we also detect the [S II] line at 4069 A and the Mg I] line at 4571 A with luminosities that are about ∼10 times lower than the [OI] 6300 A luminosity (Table 4). The [S II] transition at 4076 A comes from very similar upper energies (∼3 eV) as the 4069 A transition but the Einstein coefficient is 2.5 times smaller, consistent with our non-detection and 3σ upper limit. The [S II] at 4069 A and the Mg I] line at 4571 A peak at the stellar radial velocity as the [O I] lines. Their luminosities are similar to those predicted by the X-EUV primordial disk model with Log(Lx)=29.3 (Ercolano & Owen 2010). However, we note that this Xray luminosity is low for TW Hya, about an order of magnitude lower than what has been estimated by e.g. Kastner et al. (1999). In the framework of photoevaporative disk models, the most puzzling result is the non-detection of the other two [S II] transitions at 6716 and 6731 A with stringent upper limits pointing to fluxes ∼50 times lower than the [O I] 6300 A line. As mentioned in Sect. 2, both EUV and Xray irradiated disks should produce a strong [S II] doublet for gas at low density and flowing, similar in strength or just a factor of a few weaker than the [OI] 6300 A line. While the [SII] 6716/6731 doublet should trace more extended low density gas than other forbidden lines due to its much lower critical density3, it is unlikely that the FEROS spectra 3according to EUV models the radial extension is a factor of 2 greater than the [Ne ii] emission (out to about ±20 AU from the star) and less concentrated to the center -- 18 -- lost most of the [SII] 6716/6731 flux since the fiber diameter projected on the sky is 2.7′′ and covers radii out to ∼70 AU at the distance of TW Hya. Thus, the non-detection of these transitions points to specific conditions in the disk emitting region, specifically to dense gas, as we shall discuss later. Finally, the centrally peaked profiles and the FWHM of the optical lines can help constrain the extension of the emitting region. The [OI] 6300 A line has an intrinsic width of 10 km/s, the [SII] and MgI] lines are similarly narrow ∼10-12 km/s, hence likely trace similar disk radii. For a given ring of gas in Keplerian rotation extending out to a radius ro from the star the absence of a double peak implies: 2q( GM⋆ ro >0.4-1 AU for the mass and disk inclinations reported for TW Hya (Table 2). Again for ro )sin(i) < ∆vFEROS or gas in Keplerian rotation, the inner ring radius ri determines the maximum velocity in the line profile. Because the observed [OI] 6300 A profiles extend out to ±10 km/s (see Sect. 4.3) the inner radius of the gas ring should be <0.2 AU and can be as close to the star as 0.06 AU for a 4◦ disk inclination. This inner disk gas is likely not photoevaporating. However, if most of the emission is extended beyond about 1 AU and gas is photoevaporating, detailed disk models are necessary to compute line profiles and estimate the extension of the emitting region (see Sect. 5.2). 4.3. Comparison of [Ne II] and [O I] line profiles Our first high-resolution VISIR spectrum of TW Hya showed a hint for an asymmetry in the [Ne ii] line profile (see Fig. 4 from Pascucci & Sterzik 2009), with possibly more emission on the blue side than on the red side of the line. A flux enhancement on the blue side was also pointed out by Herczeg et al. (2007) in their lower signal-to-noise spectrum. Such an enhancement is expected for face-on disks with an optically thick midplane blocking the view of the redshifted outflowing gas (Alexander 2008; Ercolano & Owen 2010). We use -- 19 -- the 8 additional spectroscopic exposures acquired in this observational campaign to further investigate the [Ne ii] 12.81 µm profile. To check for asymmetries we apply the following method: We produce for each line a mirror spectrum (in velocity scale), then we apply small shifts in velocities to the mirror spectrum such that the upper half of the lines matches best, finally we subtract the shifted-mirror and original spectra. This method is especially sensitive to detect any blue or red excess emission in the wings of the line compared to its core emission and is more suited to lines that are poorly sampled in velocity than the line bisector method (e.g., Gray 1980). Fig. 6 summarizes our findings. Individual line profiles as well as the median of line profiles (thick black line) show an excess emission on the blue side of the [Ne ii] line peaking around -20 km/s and a typical shift of the peak centroid of -5 km/s4. The blue excess is also visible as decreased emission on the red side of the line at ∼10 km/s (see upper and lower panels of Fig. 6). We can confirm that this asymmetry is intrinsic to the source emission and not an instrumental effect by applying the same method to spectrally unresolved emission lines from Titan (see Fig. 7). We then apply the same method of mirrored spectra to simulated [Ne ii] line profiles from photoevaporative disk winds. As explained in Sect. 2, such profiles are available for the EUV-only (Alexander 2008) and the X-EUV (Ercolano & Owen 2010) models. These models use input parameters such as stellar mass, Xray and EUV luminosities that are similar to measured values for the TW Hya system but were not specifically tuened for 4The two most different curves are for PA=270 and 333◦. The line profile from the first PA shows decreased emission (one pixel) at ∼20 km/s and a positive (one pixel) emission at ∼- 30 km/s. The subtraction of the mirror-shifted profile (having reduced emission at -30 km/s and excess at 20 km/s) generates the pronounced peak at -30 km/s in the original-mirror profile. The line for PA=333◦ is consistent with a symmetric profile. -- 20 -- TW Hya (in the case of the X-EUV we use the models with Log(LX)=30.3 which are appropriate for TW Hya). In all cases the disk midplane is optically thick thus introducing an asymmetry in the line profile which is, as expected, more pronounced the closest the disk is to the face-on orientation (see Fig. 9). Applying the KS test to the difference curves shows that the XEUV 10◦ disk inclination model has just a 6% probability that the observed and model profiles are drawn from the same parent population hinting to a difference. All other models (EUV with i =3, 10◦ and XEUV with i =3◦) have probabilities as high as 40% meaning that they are all equally good matches to the data. The important result from this analysis is that the [Ne ii] emission must arise from a region in the disk that is optically thick to the redshifted outflowing gas. We shall discuss in Sect. 5 what this implies for the extension of the ionized wind component of the photoveporative flow. Finally, we also apply the method of mirrored spectra to the strongest of the optical lines, the [OI] 6300 A line, to check for asymmetries in the line profile. Fig. 8 shows that, unlike the [Ne ii] line, the [OI] profile is symmetric and the line is centered at the stellar velocity. As we will discuss in more detail in Sect. 5, this profile could result from: i) pure Keplerian motion of gas bound to the disk (i.e. the [O i] is not tracing the neutral component of the wind, it is not flowing); or ii) a photoevaporative flow from a disk region that is optically thin to the redshifted outflowing gas. Examples of symmetric lines from photoevaporative flows are presented in Ercolano & Owen (2010) for disks with inner holes in their dust and gas distribution and emission confined within the hole. Because most of the opacity is expected to be from dust (see Sect. 5) and dust extinction decreases with wavelength, our line profile analysis demonstrates that if scenario ii) applies the neutral [O i] gas does not trace the same radii as the [Ne ii] emitting gas. -- 21 -- 4.4. Spectroastrometric signal of a photoevaporative wind We attempted for the first time spectroastrometry in the mid-infrared to improve upon the spatial resolution achievable with the VLT/VISIR and resolve the innermost region of the photoevaporative wind. Spectroastrometry relies on the fact that the measurement of the centroid of a flux distribution can be determined to much better than a pixel precision depending on the signal-to-noise of the observations. In the case of VISIR one pixel corresponds to 127 mas meaning that we could investigate the [Ne ii] emission at scales better than 6 AU at the distance of TW Hya. Asymmetries in the emission at a specific wavelength appear as shifts in the centroid of the flux distribution. Using different slit PAs enables to determine the orientations at which asymmetries are stronger and thus help constraining the distribution of the source emission. To retrieve the spectroastrometric signal from our VLT/VISIR data we extract spatial profiles in each velocity channel and measure the spatial centroid of the [Ne ii] emission in cross-dispersion direction with respect to the centroid of the emission in the continuum. The continuum is measured as the mean of the continuum centroids on the red and on the blue side of the [Ne ii] line. Because of the low S/N on the continuum we summed up the spatial profiles over more than 10 pixels in velocity, we have tested that our results do not vary if we change the size of the velocity bins or the location where we measure the continuum. To determine the centroid of the spatial profiles we have tested Gaussian and Lorentzian profiles as well as the weighted mean over the FWHM of VISIR in spatial direction as proposed by Pontoppidan et al. (2008). We find that fitting the emission with Lorentzian and Gaussian profiles provide the same spectroastrometric signal and a more robust centroid than the weighted mean approach. As uncertainty on the centroid we take the inverse of the S/N for each spatial profile where the noise is measured as the standard deviation of the continuum outside the profile. This error reflects that profiles extracted -- 22 -- at velocities sampling the wings of the line have lower S/N, hence the centroid is less well determined. The centroid is also diluted by the continuum flux at each velocity to take into account the different continuum-to-line ratio moving from the core to the wing of the line (e.g., Whelan & Garcia 2008). Fig. 10 shows the centroids in pixels versus velocities in the stellocentric frame for the parallel and anti-parallel slit orientations separately. This way we can better search for any possible instrumental effects on the centroids because such effects would appear as shifts of the same sign and intensity in the couple of parallel and anti-parallel slits (Bailey 1998). The plot does not show any strong similar effect but small amplitude modulations across the [Ne ii] line and nearby continuum. As we will see next the centroids are measured to an accuracy of a tenth of a pixel close to the [Ne ii] peak emission and typically to half of a pixel in the wings where the S/N of the flux distribution in cross-dispersion direction is low5. 4.4.1. Comparison between observations and EUV-model predictions The simple EUV-only disk model is computationally fast enough that we can create channel maps for the [Ne ii] emission and compute spectroastrometric curves for the slit orientations used in this observational campaign. The model is essentially identical to the EUV-only model used by Font et al. (2004) and Alexander (2008) with a radially continuous gas distribution. The only differences between our hydrodynamic model and that of Alexander (2008) are the resolution of the model grid, and the location of the lower boundary. As we wish to generate spatially-resolved emission maps, it is necessary 5We note that the low accuracy in the centroid for PA=63◦ is due to the lower flux in the line and continuum likely caused by the fact that the source was not well centered in the slit for this PA, see Fig. 1 -- 23 -- to use higher spatial resolution than that used by Alexander (2008). In addition, we now assume that the underlying disk has a finite thickness, and place the base of the ionized wind at z/r ≃ 0.15 (e.g., Hollenbach et al. 1994). This has only a small effect on the predicted line profile, reducing the peak blue-shift by approximately 1 km/s. Our polar [(r, θ)] computational grid covers the range r = [0.03rg, 10.0rg], θ = [0, 75◦], with grid cells that are logarithmically spaced in r and linearly spaced in θ. We use Nr = 1113 cells in the radial direction and Nθ = 250 cells in the polar direction. When the grid is expanded to three dimensions (by assuming reflective symmetry about the disk mid-plane and azimuthal symmetry around the polar axis), the resulting grid has 1113 × 600 × 1200 cells in the r, θ and φ directions respectively. We compute the line emission from each grid cell in the same manner as Alexander (2008). However, following the results of Hollenbach & Gorti (2009) we adopt an ionization fraction for Ne ii of 0.75 (rather than the somewhat arbitrary value of 0.33 used previously). For comparison to the TW Hya system we adopt a stellar mass of M∗ = 0.7 M⊙ (thus rg = 6.2 AU) and a disk inclination of i = 4◦ (see Table 2 for references). We set the ionizing flux Φ by matching the predicted line luminosity to the observed value of 3.1 × 10−6L⊙: we find that Φ = 7.5 × 1040 ionizing photons per second matches the observed line flux to ∼ 1% accuracy. The integrated mass-loss rate from the disk is ∼ 1.5 × 10−10 M⊙. We create an integrated line profile (identical to that of Alexander 2008) by summing the contributions from every cell on the grid, and also generate spatially resolved emission maps by de-projecting the three-dimensional grid on to the sky plane. This is done at each (spectral) velocity to generate a three-dimensional data-cube. The model data cube has 201x201 pixels which are 0.255 AU on a side (equivalent to 5 mas at the 51 pc distance of TW Hya), and a velocity resolution of 0.1 km/s. We model the spectral resolution of VISIR by convolving the data cube (in the velocity direction) with a Gaussian profile with half-width σ = 5 km/s, to give a simulated spectral resolving power of R = 30, 000. -- 24 -- Fig. 11 shows two simulated images of the [Ne ii] emission taken at a negative and a positive velocity, the image orientation is as in Hughes et al. (2011) when N is up and left is E in the figure. To simulate the spectroastrometric signal we apply a slit in the x-axis equal to the VISIR slit width of 400 mas, collapse the flux in the x-axis and evaluate the centroid of the spatial profile in the y-axis after convolution with the VISIR PSF (FWHM of 300 mas) for each velocity channel. To simulate the rotation of the slit we rotate the simulated images by the corresponding angle and then apply the slit as described above. Fig. 12 shows the expected spectroastrometric signal as parallel minus anti-parallel centroids in VISIR pixels for the photoevaporative disk model (solid lines) and for the wind only, i.e. when Keplerian rotation is set artificially to zero (dashed lines). One sees that for a slit orientation close to the disk major axis (PA=333◦) the spectroastrometric signal is dominated by the Keplerian component of the gas, the asymmetry in the emission is small but present due to the small but non-zero disk inclination. The positive displacement at negative velocities can be understood by looking at Fig. 11: the emission at negative velocities is stronger in the direction of PA=333◦ and slit orientations close to it. The wind component dominates the signal for the slit orientation perpendicular to the disk major axis (63◦ but it is prominent also for 270◦) because at that orientation the Keplerian component is close to zero. The main results from the modeling are as follows: i) the expected shift in centroid is small, about 0.2 pixels, and ii) the shift is primarily set by projection effects (disk inclination) and the Keplerian component of the gas since the wind is more symmetrically distributed around the star. To compare model predictions with observations, we subtract the measured anti-parallel centroid positions from the parallel positions (after interpolation over the same velocity grid), see Fig. 13. For PAs 270 and 63◦, slits oriented close to the disk minor axis, the spectroastrometric shift is less than 0.1 pixel as expected. For the other two slit orientations, sampling the disk major axis, we do not detect the S-shape profile predicted for gas in -- 25 -- Keplerian rotation. We see a hint of such a profile only for PA=333◦ negative velocities which is however not present at the positive velocities. A smaller shift than predicted could result from a [Ne ii] emission that is more symmetric than predicted, from a smaller disk inclination, and/or from [Ne ii] emission more closely concentrated to the central star (in this last case, the convolution with the VISIR PSF would smear out the contrast between the bright and faint rims of the [Ne ii] emission). Further observations at even higher spectral resolution and sensitivity, especially in the wings of the line, are necessary to confirm these first results and to possibly identify the small spectroastrometric shift from photoevaporating gas that is expected for slit orientations along the minor axis. 5. Physical implications on the disk wind Before discussing the possible wind structure from the disk of TW Hya we wish to briefly summarize the main observational results presented in the previous Sections. • We confirm that the [Ne ii] emission line at 12.81 µm is blueshifted by ∼5 km/s with respect to the stellar velocity. The line is relatively narrow (FWHM∼13 km/s) and the profile is asymmetric, with more emission on the blue than on the red side. • None of the forbidden and semi-permitted optical lines investigated here appear blueshifted. On the contrary, these lines are centered in the stellocentric frame to within about 0.15 km/s. The line profiles are symmetric and the similar FWHMs (∼10 km/s) from different transitions point to optical lines tracing gas at similar radii. • The very small or zero spectroastrometric shifts for the observed PAs suggest that the [Ne ii] emission from the photoevaporative wind is predominantly spatially symmetric. -- 26 -- What are these results telling us about the structure of the photoevaporative wind and its extension? 5.1. The unbound disk component The small blueshift in the [Ne ii] line is a clear tell-tale sign of photoevaporating gas for a face-on configuration like that of TW Hya. Hence, we are sure that this line is probing the ionized component of the disk wind. This component could be the dominant wind component in the EUV case or a trace component of the mostly neutral wind in the Xray case. Our observations constrain the radial extension of the ionized wind component via the [Ne ii] line. By recovering all flux measured with Spitzer/IRS, we demonstrate that the [Ne ii] emission arises within 10 AU from the star. We note that although the radial extension of the mass loss is very different for pure EUV and X-EUV irradiation, with Xrays producing 50% of the mass loss at tens of AU (Owen et al. 2010), the [Ne ii] luminosity decreases steeply with radial distance from the star (as ∼ 1/r) hence the emission is dominated by the flux from small radii. For the specific EUV and X-EUV models discussed here 90% of the [Ne ii] emission arises within 12 AU and 15 AU respectively, which is consistent with the 10 AU radial extension inferred observationally. The blue excess in the wing of the [Ne ii] line adds a further constraint on the radii traced by this wind component. We have shown in Sect. 4.3 that primordial disks (no gaps) irradiated by EUV and Xrays can reproduce the [Ne ii] line profile and peak emission. Here we ask the question: how much [Ne ii] emission could originate in an optically thin region and still be consistent with the observed [Ne ii] profile? To simulate the [Ne ii] profile from optically thin disk radii we take a gaussian centered at zero velocity and FWHM set by thermal broadening for gas at ∼5,000 K (Xray heating) or ∼10,000 K (EUV heating) and convolved with the FWHM of the VISIR spectrograph. We add as much as 10, 20, and 30% -- 27 -- of the total emission to the [Ne ii] profile from a fully thick disk and compare the resulting profile with the observed one. We find that already a 10% contribution from radii optically thin to the [Ne ii] emission shifts the line peak emission redward to ∼-4 km/s, marginally consistent with our measurements, and increases the symmetry of the line. This simple approach shows that more than 80% of the [Ne ii] emission should come from a disk region that is fully optically thick to the [Ne ii] line. What is then the source of opacity within 10 AU from the central star? This is a relevant question for transition-type sources like TW Hya whose SEDs clearly point to opacity gaps in their disks. First we look at the gas component and show that the [Ne ii] line is optically thin and gas alone cannot be responsible for the blueshift and line asymmetry. Hollenbach & McKee (1989) calculated that a column of Ne+ of a few times 1018 cm−2 (or a few 1022 H atoms for a solar Ne/H abundance ratio) is necessary to produce an optical depth of 1 at the center of the [Ne ii] line. This density has to be compared with < 1016 cm−2 Ne+ in the EUV layer and < 1017 cm−2 in the Xray layer (Hollenbach & Gorti 2009; Glassgold et al. 2007), clearly not sufficient to make the line optically thick. That the line is optically thin is also clear from the observed line profile which does not show any absorption at the line center, where the optical depth is the highest. Sub-micron dust grains are the next major source of opacity. According to the disk model of Calvet et al. (2002) the inner disk of TW Hya could have only a tiny amount (0.5 lunar masses) of micron-sized grains out to ∼4 AU and thus would be optically thin at visible and even more at infrared wavelengths out to that radial distance. However, Ratzka et al. (2007) show that this model gives a factor of 2 too high mid-infrared visibilities as well as the wrong wavelength dependence of the visibility. They argue that the dust inner rim, hence the transition from thin to thick disk, must happen much closer in at about 0.5-0.8 AU. More recently, Akeson et al. (2011) also argue for the presence of optically -- 28 -- thick dust within 4 AU. They propose a more complex structure with an optically thick dust ring centered at 0.5 AU, a dust gap, and the full optically thick dust disk starting at ∼4 AU. Our simple approach of combining [Ne ii] profiles from optically thin and thick disk radii suggests that more than 80% of the [Ne ii] emission should arise from disk radii where the midplane is optically thick to the [Ne ii] emission. If the optically thin disk extends out to 4 AU as in the model of Calvet et al. (2002), then the observed [Ne ii] profile cannot be reproduced by the EUV-only and X-EUV models from Alexander (2008) and Ercolano & Owen (2010) because in these models ∼50% of the [Ne ii] emission arises within 4 AU. If the dust inner rim is at ∼1 AU, as in the Ratzka et al. (2007) model, then these models can explain the blueshift and asymmetry in the line profile since they both predict that ∼90% of the [Ne ii] emission comes from outside 1 AU, i.e. from disk radii where the midplane would be optically thick. A different model, also consistent with our observations, is that from Gorti et al. (2011). From a detailed analysis of many gas emission lines from TW Hya and using the Calvet et al. dust distribution with a static disk model, they find that 75% of the [Ne ii] emission line comes from the surface of the optically thick dust disk beyond the 4 AU gap. 5.2. The disk component traced by optical lines Unlike in the case of the [Ne ii] line, the forbidden and semi-permitted optical lines investigated here are not blueshifted with respect to the stellar radial velocity. The lack of blueshift could have two origins: i) the optical lines trace a wind component at disk radii where the midplane is optically thin to the redshifted outflowing gas; OR ii) the optical lines do not trace the photoevaporative flow but rather gas that is bound to the star/disk system. In reference to the [OI] optical lines, this means that we do not have an unambiguous diagnostic for the neutral wind component of the disk as we have for the -- 29 -- ionized component. In the following, we discuss what other constraints we can place on the disk region traced by the optical lines and what observations could discriminate between the two scenarios presented above. First of all, the similarity in the FWHM of the [OI] 5577, 6300, 6364 A, the [SII] at 4068 A, and the MgI] at 4571 A suggests that these lines trace similar disk radii. Based on the centrally peaked profiles and maximum observed velocities, we argue in Sect. 4.2 that the emission could extend as close as 0.06 AU to the star, where the disk may be magnetospherically truncated, to and possibly beyond 1 AU. The observed [OI] 6300/5577 A line ratio of ∼7 as well as the non-detection of the [SII] doublet 6716/6730 A point to a region of high temperature and electron density. For gas in local thermal equilibrium (LTE) and optically thin emission we can write the [SII] 6716 and 4069 A ratio as: L4069 L6716 = n(2P )A4069∆E4069 n(2D)A6716∆E6716 (1) n(2P ) and n(2D) are the upper level populations which in LTE are linked as n(2P )/n(2D) ∼ 4/6 × e−14,000/T . To explain a line flux ratio higher than 6 we thus require gas hotter than ∼3,000 K. A similar argument applied to the [OI] 6300 and 5577 A lines yields a similarly high temperature (Gorti et al. 2011). Such a high temperature can be reached within a few AU from the star in a disk atmosphere irradiated by stellar Xray but LTE requires very high electron densities (ne & 108cm−3) which may not be present in the photoevaporative wind (Gorti et al. 2011). We turn now to the strong [OI] lines and on the neutral component of the disk wind to investigate the two scenarios proposed at the beginning of this section. In the first scenario, the [O I] emission is thermal and arises from the hot (>5,000 K) disk surface heated by stellar Xrays. Ercolano & Owen (2010) have shown that line profiles can be symmetric even if the gas is flowing and any blueshift in the peak emission can be small, a few tenth of km/s, if most of the emission arises within the dust depleted inner -- 30 -- disk6. For the specific case of TW Hya an inner dust hole of 2 AU would produce a blueshift in the [OI] line greater than 1 km/s and slightly asymmetric profiles while a 4 AU hole would give just a shift of 0.4 km/s and a symmetric profile pointing to the flow traced by the [OI] emission extending well beyond 2 AU. The FWHM of the line is in both models relatively large ∼20 km/s, a factor of 2 larger than measured. The line broadening can be reduced if the emission in the flow is suppressed and the bound [O i] thermal component arising from within a few AU dominates the emission. This strongly points to the second scenario in which the [OI] lines are not tracing the neutral component of the photoevaporative wind in the disk of TW Hya but rather the bound disk component well inside the gravitational radius. A variant to the second scenario is that proposed by Gorti et al. (2011). In this model, which is specifically for TW Hya, most of the [O I] emission is not thermal but produced from dissociation of OH molecules by stellar FUV photons leading to O atoms in electronically excited states and their subsequent decay to the ground state. Gorti et al. (2011) find that this mechanism gives a 6300/5577 A line ratio of ∼7, very similar to the observed one. Because the [O i] emission comes from cooler gas closer to the disk midplane the emitting gas would not participate to the photoevaporative flow and hence [OI] lines would be narrower and symmetric around the stellar velocity. The [SII] line ratios are also reproduced in this model since most of the emission arises in the hot and dense gas close to the star within the dust depleted inner disk. A way to directly discriminate between bound and unbound oxygen gas is through spectroastrometry in the [OI] 6300 A line. For gas in Keplerian rotation the 6As in the case of the [Ne ii] line sub-micron dust grains are the main source of opacity. For the [OI] 6300 A line the H column density to reach optical depth of one is as high as 2×1025 cm−2. -- 31 -- spectroastrometric signal will be symmetric in velocity and the strongest for a slit oriented along the disk major axis, the signal will be zero for a slit perpendicular to the major axis (see, e.g. Fig. 12). The presence of a photoevaporative wind alters the symmetric spectroastrometric signal and produces a shift in the flux distribution versus wavelength even for a slit perpendicular to the disk major axis. With a combination of good seeing (∼1′′) and high signal to-noise a few milli-arcsecond accuracy can be attained via spectroastrometry at visible wavelengths (see e.g. Takami et al. 2003). Hence, detecting asymmetries around 1 AU, which would produce shifts of ∼20 mas, is well within the reach of this technique. 5.3. On determining photoevaporation rates Our study of TW Hya represents the first attempt to identify and combine information from multiple gas lines at infrared and optical wavelengths that could trace the photoevaporative disk wind. Here, we summarize the observables reproduced by different disk models as applied to TW Hya and discuss how to nail down photoevaporation rates from protoplanetary disks. The intensity of the [Ne ii] line at 12.81 µm can be reproduced by all models: in the EUV-only model ionized neon atoms trace the skin of the disk while in the X-EUV and XE-FUV models they trace a deeper, mostly neutral layer that participates to the flow. Any asymmetry in the line profile tells us where most of the emission arises with respect to the optically thick dust disk. A better determination of the transition from thin to thick disk could potentially validate or invalidate the EUV/Xray photoevaporation models (see Sect. 5.1). The strong [O i] line at 6300 A from TW Hya cannot arise from the EUV layer because this layer is mostly ionized and produces only weak [O I] emission. While the [O I] peak emission from several T Tauri stars in the Hartigan et al. (1995) sample presents -- 32 -- a small blueshift pointing to a possible origin in the Xray wind, this is not the case for TW Hya. In addition, the small FWHM of the [O I] line also argues against most of the emission tracing the wind and rather points to bound gas close to the star. The luminosities of the [S II] at 4068 and the Mg I] at 4571 A can be reproduced by the X-EUV primordial disk model but with a stellar Xray luminosity that is 10 times weaker than that of TW Hya (Table 1 from Ercolano & Owen 2010). The non-detection of the [S II] doublet at 6717 and 6731 A is also puzzling in the frame of both the EUV and the X-EUV model. For our results to be consistent with these models, sulfur should be depleted in the disk wind. Depletion of more refractory elements such as silicon and aluminum has been previously proposed for the gas surrounding TW Hya (e.g., Lamzin et al. 2004). Elemental abundances therefore add an additional uncertainty when comparing observed line fluxes to model calculations. Alternatively the XE-FUV model developed for TW Hya explains the non-detections of the [S II] doublet and proposes that the observed [S II] line at 4069 A arises from dense, bound gas in the inner disk (Gorti et al. 2011). Similarly to the forbidden optical lines, the CO line profiles and their spectroastrometric signal are consistent with bound gas in Keplerian rotation around TW Hya (Pontoppidan et al. 2008). More effort should be devoted in identifying gas lines that trace the predominantly neutral winds of XE-FUV and X-EUV irradiated disks both around TW Hya as well as around other young stars. Establishing the presence of this component would point to flow rates 1-2 orders of magnitude larger than the 10−10 M⊙/yr predicted by EUV-only photoevaporation models. In addition, attempts should be made to empirically measure the ionizing flux impinging on the surface of protoplanetary disks via for instance line flux ratios from two successive stages of ionization of a given element or from volatile elements tracing the flow. -- 33 -- 6. Concluding remarks In the present work we have provided observational constraints to the photoevaporative wind from the disk of TW Hya. We confirm our previous finding that the [Ne ii] 12.81 µm line traces the ionized component of the wind from the disk of TW Hya (Pascucci & Sterzik 2009). This would be the dominant wind component in the EUV case and a trace component in the predominantly neutral Xray wind. From the blueshift and asymmetry in the line profile, we estimate that most (>80%) of the [Ne ii] flux arises from disk radii where the midplane is optically thick to the emission, meaning beyond the 1 or 4 AU dust gap inferred from other observations. We note that depending on the observations/disk modeling this gap may be not completely evacuated of dust (Calvet et al. 2002; Ratzka et al. 2007; Akeson et al. 2011). We also show that the [Ne ii] emission is confined within 10 AU from the star. Our spectroastrometry in the [Ne ii] line suggests that the wind flux is rather spatially symmetric around the star but the current dataset is not of quality high enough to provide additional constraints to the structure of the photoevaporative flow. We find that optical forbidden lines such as the strong [O i] emission line at 6300 A have remarkably different profiles from the [Ne ii] 12.81 µm line, in that they are centered at the stellar velocity and are symmetric. The only way these lines could trace the photoevaporative flow is if they arise from a disk region physically different from that traced by the [Ne ii] line, specifically from within the optically thin dust gap. However, the small FWHM of the optical lines indicates that most of the gas is likely bound, which would imply gas very close to the star (inside the ∼1 AU critical radius for photoevaporation) if the Keplerian velocity contributes most to the line broadening. The above characteristics of the gaseous disk of TW Hya can be used to speculate on the origin of its transition-like SED. One possibility for creating dust gaps in circumstellar disks and still account for accretion onto the star is via dynamical clearing by forming giant -- 34 -- planets (Lubow & D'Angelo 2006). For the specific case of TW Hya, partial dust clearing is required at most out to ∼4 AU from the star (Calvet et al. 2002). Recent hydrodynamic simulations by Zhu et al. (2011) suggest that one giant planet might account for this moderate-size gap (see also Gorti et al. 2011) and still result in the measured accretion rate of 10−9 M⊙/yr (Muzerolle et al. 2000; Alencar & Batalha 2002). Another possibility is that the gap is not opened by a planet but rather by photoevaporation and we are catching the star in the process of dispersing its disk. Recent XEUV-driven photoevaporation models predict that there is a non-negligible amount of time (2-3×105 yr) during which photoevaporation can carve a moderate-size gap, accretion onto the star is still detectable, and dust grains are cleared out under the action of dust drag (Owen et al. 2011). We would like to stress that the on-going photoevaporation from the disk of TW Hya reported here does not exclude the existence of a giant planet and does not preclude that a forming giant planet has dynamically cleared the inner disk. Infact, a giant planet might expedite the onset of substantial (and detectable) photoevaporation by depleting the inner disk surface density which reduces the stellar accretion rate and exposes the region out of the rim with direct unattenuated flux from the star. Besides detecting a planet at a few AU from TW Hya, there are other observables that could help discriminating between a planet-induced and a photoevaporation-induced disk gap. If the putative giant planet is on an eccentric orbit, one might see variations in the dust disk structure and related dust emission on the Keplerian timescale of the planet, a few years. Regardless of the planet's eccentricity, dynamical clearing would result in a sharp transition in surface density at the outer gap edge which could be imaged with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array. IP is pleased to acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) through an Astronomy & Astrophysics research grant (AST0908479). IP thanks E. -- 35 -- Flaccomio for making available the VISIR spectra of Titan and K. Pontoppidan for valuable discussions. RDA acknowledges support from the Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) through an Advanced Fellowship (ST/G00711X/1). SHPA acknowledges support from Fapemig and CAPES, brazilian research agencies. This research used the ALICE High Performance Computing Facility at the University of Leicester. Some resources on ALICE form part of the DiRAC Facility jointly funded by STFC and the Large Facilities Capital Fund of BIS. Facilities: VLT (VISIR), 1.5m ESO (FEROS). -- 36 -- Slit center+/-(FWHM/2) Slit-Source center 63 90 Sky Position Angle (degree) 153 180 243 270 333 ) l e x p ( i n o i t c e r i d d e s r e p s d i s s o r c e c r u o S - t i l S 4 2 0 -2 -4 0 Fig. 1. -- Difference in pixels between the location of TW Hya and the center of the slit before each spectroscopic integration. The x-axis gives the position angle in degrees. Vertical errorbars centered at y=0 show the extension of the slit image (FWHM) in cross-dispersion direction. Except for PA=63◦ TW Hya was well positioned inside the slit. -- 37 -- PA = 0o PA = 180o PA = 270o PA = 90o PA = 333o ] y J [ x u F l 6 4 2 0 -60 -40 -20 0 0 Velocity [km/s] 20 40 60 Fig. 2. -- The five flux calibrated spectra of TW Hya around the [Ne ii] emission line. The x-axis gives the velocity in the stellocentric frame. -- 38 -- VISIR spectrum of Titan 12.80 12.81 Wavelength [µm] 12.82 12.83 40 30 20 10 0 4 2 0 -2 y t i s n e t n I ] s / m k [ v ∆ -4 12.79 Fig. 3. -- VISIR spectra of Titan demonstrating the accuracy of the dispersion solution. The upper panel marks in (green) dashed-lines the C2H2 transitions from the HITRAN database. This spectrum of Titan (we analyzed two spectra) has been shifted to match the single C2H2 line at ∼12.803µm. The lower panel gives the velocity difference in km/s for lines marked in the upper panel. The location of the [Ne ii] line is also shown (black vertical dashed line). The two single C2H2 lines are marked with arrows. 'X' symbols give shifts when the rest frame is computed from the single line at ∼12.819µm, while diamonds from the single line at ∼12.803µm. The standard deviation of the velocity difference, which gives the relative uncertainty, is 1 km/s. The absolute uncertainty is a factor of two larger (see text). -- 39 -- 153 180 333 270 0 63 180 270 333 1.0 1.1 0 1.2 Airmass 1.3 90 243 90 1.4 50 45 40 35 30 25 -4 -5 -6 -7 W E k a e p V x u F l 7 6 5 4 3 2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 m u u n i t n o C Fig. 4. -- [Ne ii] line EW (A), peak centroid (km/s in the stellocentric frame), flux (×10−14erg cm−2 s−1), and adjacent continuum (Jy) versus the airmass at which the spec- troscopic observations were carried out. PAs are also overplotted. Note the anti-correlation between the [Ne ii] flux and adjacent continuum with airmass suggesting that most of the observed variations in these quantities are related to flux calibration uncertainties rather than to intrinsic source variability. Also note that for PA=63◦, which shows the lowest EW and the largest blueshift, the source was not well centered in the slit (see Fig. 1). -- 40 -- 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -6 -4 vstar(CaI6439) vstar(OI6364) 4 6 -2 0 Velocity OI6300 - vstar [km/s] 2 Fig. 5. -- Histogram of the velocity shifts of the [O i] 6300 A line with respect to the stellar velocity measured via the photospheric CaI 6439 (black dashed line) and the [O i] 6364 A (red solid line) lines. The CaI 6439 A and the [O i] 6364 A fall on the same echelle order while the [O i] 6300 A line falls on a different echelle order. The fact that the two histograms look very similar and have the same median and standard deviation demonstrate that the [O i] 6300 A line is centered at the stellar velocity and the small blueshift between the [O i] 6300 and the CaI 6439 A line is just due to small differences in the dispersion solutions of the two echelle orders. -- 41 -- PA=90o Original Mirror 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 k a e p o t m r o N r o r r i M - l a n g i r i O -100 -50 0 Velocity [km/s] 50 100 Fig. 6. -- [Ne ii] line profiles from TW Hya. The upper panel gives the original (black) and mirror-shifted (red) profile for PA=90◦. Note that the continuum is subtracted and the emission is normalized to the peak. The lower panel shows the difference curves (original- mirror) for all eight PAs. The color coding is as follows: light black for PA 180◦, red for 90◦, green for 0◦, blue for 270◦, yellow for 153◦, cyan for 63◦, violet for 243◦, and orange for 333◦. The average difference curve is overplotted using a thick black line. Note that most difference curves (as well as the average difference curve) have an excess on the blue side, peaking at about -20 km/s. This shows that the line is asymmetric with a blue wing due to photoevaporating gas accelerating toward the observer. -- 42 -- Lines from Titan Original Mirror a m g s 3 i a m g s 3 i 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 k a e p o t m r o N r o r r i M - l a n g i r i O -40 -20 0 Velocity [km/s] 20 40 Fig. 7. -- Line profiles from Titan (PID 083.C-0883). The continuum near the line is removed and lines are normalized to the peak emission as for TW Hya (also note the same y scale as in Fig. 6). Lower panel: difference curves (original-mirror profiles) for 3 emission lines from two different spectra of Titan. This figure shows that the asymmetry seen in the [Ne ii] line profiles of TW Hya is not an instrumental artifact. -- 43 -- Original Mirror 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 k a e p o t m r o N r o r r i M - l a n g i r i O -100 -50 0 Velocity [km/s] 50 100 Fig. 8. -- Asymmetry analysis for the [O i] 6300A emission lines of TW Hya. The upper panel gives the original (black) and mirror-shifted (red) profile from one of the optical spectra obtained by Alencar & Batalha (2002). The lower panel shows the difference curves (original- mirror) from the 10 spectra obtained in February 2000 (Alencar & Batalha 2002), different colors are for spectra obtained in different days. Note that unlike the [Ne ii] line at 12.81µm the [O i] line at 6300A is not blueshifted and has a symmetric profile. -- 44 -- k a e p o t m r o N 0.10 0.05 0.00 -0.05 -0.10 EUV i=3o Xrays i=3o EUV i=10o Xrays i=10o -60 -40 -20 0 Velocity [km/s] 20 40 60 Fig. 9. -- Comparison of difference curves (original-mirror profiles) for predicted and ob- served [Ne ii] line profiles. Black solid and dashed lines are the difference curves from the EUV photoevaporation model, while red solid and dashed lines are from the Xray photoe- vaporation model for disks inclined by 10 and 3◦ respectively. All models assume that the disk midplane is optically thick. The blue line is the median of the difference curves from the observed [Ne ii] profiles of TW Hya (see also Fig. 6) with the standard deviation of the curves overplotted. -- 45 -- Parallel orientation: 0,270,333,63 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 Anti-Parallel orientation: 180,90,153,243 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 l s e x P i l s e x P i -20 -10 Velocity [km/s] 0 10 -20 -10 Velocity [km/s] 0 10 Fig. 10. -- Centroid in pixels versus velocities in the stellocentric frame for the parallel (left panel) and anti-parallel (right panel) slit orientations. The color coding is as follows: black for 0 and 180◦, red for 270 and 90◦, green for 333 and 153◦, and blue for 63 and 243◦. -- 46 -- Simulated [NeII] emission from the disk of TW Hya 100 50 0 0 -50 100 50 0 0 -50 v = -10 km/s v = +1 km/s -100 -100 -50 0 0 distance [mas] 50 -100 100 -100 -50 0 0 distance [mas] 50 100 ] s a m [ e c n a t s d i Fig. 11. -- Modelled [Ne ii] emission for two velocity channels, -10 km/s and +1 km/s. The asymmetry is mainly due to the combination of disk inclination (4◦) and Keplerian rotation. The wind is mainly symmetric but introduces deviations from the spectroastrometric Ke- plerian profiles, see text. The TW Hya disk position angle is 333◦. On the left panel the black rim N-W is a factor of ∼3 brighter than the grey emission S-E. On the right panel the contrast between the bright emission (now S-E) and the weaker emission (N-W) is about 5 but occurs at a much smaller spatial scale. These images are convolved with the VISIR PSF when simulating the spectro-astrometric signal. -- 47 -- 0o 270o 333o 63o Keplerian+wind Only wind 0.2 0.1 0.0 l ] s e x P i [ f f i D -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -20 -10 0 Velocity [km/s] 10 20 Fig. 12. -- Spectroastrometric signal (parallel minus antiparallel centroids) predicted by a disk photoevaporated by stellar EUV photons (solid lines). Dashed lines show only the wind component, i.e. when Keplerian rotation is artificially set to zero. The plot shows that the largest spectroastrometric signal from the disk wind is expected for PA=63◦, the slit orientation perpendicular to the disk major axis. One pixel on VISIR is 127 mas. -- 48 -- 0o 270o 333o 63o 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 l ] s e x P i [ f f i D l ] s e x P i [ f f i D -20 -10 Velocity [km/s] 0 10 Fig. 13. -- Spectroastrometric signal observed (diamonds) and predicted (lines, see Fig. 12 for color coding). The y-axis gives the difference in pixels between a position angle and its antiparallel position angle (e.g., 0◦corresponds to 0◦-180◦). One pixel on VISIR is 127 mas, therefore the level of asymmetry we detect has a radial extension of ∼1.3 AU. -- 49 -- Table 1. Summary of the TW Hya observations. The observing time (in U.T.), the airmass, and the heliocentric radial velocity corrections (vhelio) are given at the beginning and at the end of each spectroscopic exposure. On-source exposure times for TW Hya were set to 1 h, for standard stars exposures varied between 240 and 360 s. In the second night, we observed only one standard star for PA=333◦. PAa (◦) 0 180 270 90 333 153 63 243 Date U.T. Airmass yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm vhelio (km/s) Calibrator Airmass 2010-02-23 02:12/03:41 1.3/1.1 11.53/11.40 HD 90957 2010-02-23 03:54/05:23 1.1/1.0 11.38/11.23 HD 90957 2010-02-23 06:27/07:54 1.0/1.2 11.11/10.97 HD 101666 2010-02-23 08:25/09:42 1.3/1.5 10.93/10.84 HD 101666 2010-02-24 02:45/04:15 1.2/1.1 11.11/10.97 HD 90957 2010-02-24 04:28/05:58 1.0/1.0 10.95/10.79 2010-02-24 06:24/07:51 1.0/1.2 10.74/10.70 2010-02-24 08:07/09:38 1.2/1.7 10.58/10.47 -- -- -- 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.2 -- -- -- aThe position angle (PA) is measured from N toward E. Table 2. Main properties of the TW Hya star/disk system inferred from other studies and utilized in this paper. Property Value Reference Stellar mass Distance 0.7 M⊙ 51±4 pc 1 2 Disk inclination 4.3±1◦,7±1◦,5-6◦ 3,4,5 Disk PA 332±10◦, 335±2◦ Stellar ionizing flux 1041 phot/s 3,5 6 References. -- (1) Muzerolle et al. 2000; (2) Mamajek 2005; (3) Pontoppidan et al. 2008; (4) Qi et al. 2004; (5) Hughes et al. 2011; (6) Pascucci & Sterzik 2009 -- 50 -- Table 3. Main parameters of the [Ne ii] line and adjacent continuum for different position angles (PA). PA (◦) 0 180 270 90 333 153 63 243 EW (A) FWHM vpeak Line Flux Continuum (km/s) (km/s) (×10−14erg cm−2 s−1) (Jy) 43±1 15.2±0.4 -5.0±0.2 47.1±0.8 16.9±0.4 -4.9±0.1 44±1 36±1 47±1 15.0±0.4 -4.8±0.2 15.8±0.5 -5.9±0.2 15.9±0.4 -6.2±0.2 47.7±0.8 16.6±0.3 -3.9±0.3 30±1 35±1 17.5±0.7 -7.5±0.3 17.2±0.6 -3.9±0.3 2.6±0.1 6.5±0.2 4.4±0.1 3.0±0.1 3.2±0.1 -- -- -- 0.3 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 -- -- -- Note. -- Errors on the EWs are computed using a Monte Carlo approach: we added a normally distributed noise to the spectrum (following the error at each wavelength) and give as error the standard deviation of the EW distribution of 1000 such spectra. The errors on the FWHM, peak emission, and line flux are computed from the gaussian fit to the [Ne ii] line taking into account the uncertainty at each wavelength. Note that the absolute radial velocity accuracy reachable with VISIR is ∼2 km/s (Sect. 3.1), larger than the uncertainties on the [Ne ii] peak velocities derived from the gaussian fit. -- 51 -- Table 4. Line EWs and upper limits for other optical lines predicted to trace the photoevaporative wind. Species Wavelength (A) Terms a Aul (s−1) OI OI OI OII MgI NII SII SII SII SII 5577.3387 1.26(0) 1D-1S 6300.304 5.65(-3) 3P-1D 6363.777 1.82(-3) 3P-1D 7330.73 5.34(-2) 2D-2P <0.04 4571.0956 2.54(2) 1S-3P 0.08 6583.460 2.92(-3) 3P-1D <0.007 4068.600 3.41(-1) 4076.349 1.34(-1) 4S-2P 4S-2P 0.09 <0.03 6716.440 4.66(-4) 4S-2D <0.01 6730.810 4.26(-4) 4S-2D <0.008 EW (A) 0.09 0.47 0.15 veiling Luminositya (L⊙) 1.5(-6) 1.1(-5) 3.2(-6) <9.1(-7) 6.4(-7) <1.5(-7) 1.4(-6) <4.8(-7) <2.3(-7) <1.9(-7) 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 2 2 0.5 0.6 aThe transition probability from NIST and the line luminosity are given as a(b) meaning a×10b. Note. -- Wavelengths are in air. EWs, veilings, and corresponding line lumi- nosities are median values. Uncertainties on the measured EWs are about ∼10%. Because of night-to-night variations in the source brightness and in the veiling the luminosities reported here have an uncertainty of ∼50% (see Sect. 4.2). -- 52 -- REFERENCES Adams, F. C., Hollenbach, D., Laughlin, G., & Gorti, U. 2004, ApJ, 611, 360 Akeson, R. L., et al. 2011, ApJ, 728, 96 Alencar, S. H. P., & Batalha, C. 2002, ApJ, 571, 378 Alexander, R. D. 2008, MNRAS, 391, L64 Alexander, R. D., Clarke, C. J., & Pringle, J. E. 2006a, MNRAS, 369, 216 -- . 2006b, MNRAS, 369, 229 Armitage, P. J. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Bailey, J. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 161 Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A., & Sitko, M. 2002, ApJ, 568, 1008 Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., & Strom, S. E. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 377 Cieza, L. A., Swift, J. J., Mathews, G. S., & Williams, J. P. 2008, ApJ, 686, L115 Clarke, C. J., Gendrin, A., & Sotomayor, M. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 485 Currie, T., Lada, C. J., Plavchan, P., Robitaille, T. P., Irwin, J., & Kenyon, S. J. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1 Dullemond, C. P., Hollenbach, D., Kamp, I., & D'Alessio, P. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 555 Ercolano, B., & Clarke, C. J. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2735 Ercolano, B., Drake, J. J., Raymond, J. C., & Clarke, C. C. 2008, ApJ, 688, 398 -- 53 -- Ercolano, B., & Owen, J. E. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1553 Font, A. S., McCarthy, I. G., Johnstone, D., & Ballantyne, D. R. 2004, ApJ, 607, 890 Glassgold, A. E., Najita, J. R., & Igea, J. 2007, ApJ, 656, 515 Gorti, U., Dullemond, C. P., & Hollenbach, D. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1237 Gorti, U., & Hollenbach, D. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1539 Gray, D. F. 1980, ApJ, 235, 508 Hartigan, P., Edwards, S., & Ghandour, L. 1995, ApJ, 452, 736 Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., & D'Alessio, P. 1998, ApJ, 495, 385 Hayashi, C., Nakazawa, K., & Nakagawa, Y. 1985, in Protostars and Planets II, ed. D. C. Black & M. S. Matthews, 1100 -- 1153 Herczeg, G. J., Najita, J. R., Hillenbrand, L. A., & Pascucci, I. 2007, ApJ, 670, 509 Hollenbach, D., & Gorti, U. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1203 Hollenbach, D., Johnstone, D., Lizano, S., & Shu, F. 1994, ApJ, 428, 654 Hollenbach, D., & McKee, C. F. 1989, ApJ, 342, 306 Hollenbach, D. J., Yorke, H. W., & Johnstone, D. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 401 Horne, K. 1986, PASP, 98, 609 Hughes, A. M., Wilner, D. J., Andrews, S. M., Qi, C., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2011, ApJ, 727, 85 Kaufl, H. U. 2006, in Planetary Nebulae Beyond the Milky Way, ed. L. Stanghellini, J. R. Walsh, & N. G. Douglas, 201 -- + -- 54 -- Kim, K. H., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1017 Lagage, P. O., et al. 2004, The Messenger, 117, 12 Liffman, K. 2003, PASA, 20, 337 Lubow, S. H., & D'Angelo, G. 2006, ApJ, 641, 526 Mamajek, E. E. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1385 Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N., Briceno, C., Hartmann, L., & Hillenbrand, L. 2000, ApJ, 535, L47 Muzerolle, J., Hartmann, L., & Calvet, N. 1998, AJ, 116, 455 Najita, J. R., Carr, J. S., Strom, S. E., Watson, D. M., Pascucci, I., Hollenbach, D., Gorti, U., & Keller, L. 2010, ApJ, 712, 274 Natta, A., Testi, L., Calvet, N., Henning, T., Waters, R., & Wilner, D. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 767 Owen, J. E., Ercolano, B., & Clarke, C. J. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 13 Owen, J. E., Ercolano, B., Clarke, C. J., & Alexander, R. D. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1415 Pascucci, I., & Sterzik, M. 2009, ApJ, 702, 724 Pascucci, I., & Tachibana, S. 2010, The Clearing of Protoplanetary Disks and of the Protosolar Nebula (Apai, D. A. & Lauretta, D. S.), 263 -- 298 Pontoppidan, K. M., Blake, G. A., van Dishoeck, E. F., Smette, A., Ireland, M. J., & Brown, J. 2008, ApJ, 684, 1323 Qi, C., et al. 2004, ApJ, 616, L11 -- 55 -- Ratzka, T., Leinert, C., Henning, T., Bouwman, J., Dullemond, C. P., & Jaffe, W. 2007, A&A, 471, 173 Rothman, L. S., & Gordon, I. E. 2009, in 64th International Symposium On Molecular Spectroscopy Rucinski, S. M., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 1913 Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Henning, T., & Hartmann, L. W. 2010, ApJ, 710, 597 Weintraub, D. A., Kastner, J. H., & Bary, J. S. 2000, ApJ, 541, 767 Whelan, E., & Garcia, P. 2008, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, Vol. 742, Jets from Young Stars II, ed. F. Bacciotti, L. Testi, & E. Whelan, 123 -- + Yasui, C., Kobayashi, N., Tokunaga, A. T., Saito, M., & Tokoku, C. 2009, ApJ, 705, 54 Zhu, Z., Nelson, R. P., Hartmann, L., Espaillat, C., & Calvet, N. 2011, ApJ, 729, 47 This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
1211.5148	1	1211	2012-11-21T21:04:18	Millimeter Emission Structure in the first ALMA Image of the AU Mic Debris Disk	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	We present 1.3 millimeter ALMA Cycle 0 observations of the edge-on debris disk around the nearby, ~10 Myr-old, M-type star AU Mic. These observations obtain 0.6 arcsec (6 AU) resolution and reveal two distinct emission components: (1) the previously known dust belt that extends to a radius of 40 AU, and (2) a newly recognized central peak that remains unresolved. The cold dust belt of mass about 1 lunar mass is resolved in the radial direction with a rising emission profile that peaks sharply at the location of the outer edge of the "birth ring" of planetesimals hypothesized to explain the midplane scattered light gradients. No significant asymmetries are discerned in the structure or position of this dust belt. The central peak identified in the ALMA image is ~6 times brighter than the stellar photosphere, which indicates an additional emission process in the inner regions of the system. Emission from a stellar corona or activity may contribute, but the observations show no signs of temporal variations characteristic of radio-wave flares. We suggest that this central component may be dominated by dust emission from an inner planetesimal belt of mass about 0.01 lunar mass, consistent with a lack of emission shortward of 25 microns and a location <3 AU from the star. Future millimeter observations can test this assertion, as an inner dust belt should be readily separated from the central star at higher angular resolution.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	accepted by ApJ Letters: November 17, 2012 Millimeter Emission Structure in the first ALMA Image of the AU Mic Debris Disk Meredith A. MacGregor1, David J. Wilner1, Katherine A. Rosenfeld1, Sean M. Andrews1, Brenda Matthews2, A. Meredith Hughes3, Mark Booth2,4, Eugene Chiang3, James R. Graham3,5, Paul Kalas3,6, Grant Kennedy7, Bruce Sibthorpe8 ABSTRACT We present 1.3 millimeter ALMA Cycle 0 observations of the edge-on debris disk around the nearby, ∼10 Myr-old, M-type star AU Mic. These observations obtain 0.′′6 (6 AU) resolution and reveal two distinct emission components: (1) the previously known dust belt that extends to a radius of 40 AU, and (2) a newly recognized central peak that remains unresolved. The cold dust belt of mass ∼ 1 MMoon is resolved in the radial direction with a rising emission profile that peaks sharply at the location of the outer edge of the "birth ring" of planetesimals hypothesized to explain the midplane scattered light gradients. No significant asymmetries are discerned in the structure or position of this dust belt. The central peak identified in the ALMA image is ∼ 6 times brighter than the stellar photosphere, which indicates an additional emission process in the inner regions of the system. Emission from a stellar corona or activity may contribute, but the observations show no signs of temporal variations characteristic of radio- wave flares. We suggest that this central component may be dominated by dust 1Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, 5072 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada 3Department of Astronomy, 601 Campbell Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 4Deptarment of Physics & Astronomy, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Rd., Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada 5Dunlap Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada 6SETI Institute, 189 Bernardo Ave., Mountain View, CA 94043 7Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 8SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, NL-9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands -- 2 -- emission from an inner planetesimal belt of mass ∼ 0.01 MMoon, consistent with a lack of emission shortward of 25 µm and a location .3 AU from the star. Future millimeter observations can test this assertion, as an inner dust belt should be readily separated from the central star at higher angular resolution. Subject headings: dividual (AU Microscopii) -- submillimeter: planetary systems circumstellar matter -- planet-disk interactions -- stars: in- 1. Introduction Debris disks are created by the collisional erosion of planetesimals, the building blocks of planetary systems. These collisions continuously generate dust grains with a range of sizes that are detected with astronomical measurements from optical to radio wavelengths. Resolved observations of nearby debris disks are instrumental in advancing our understanding of these systems. At a distance of 9.91 ± 0.10 pc (van Leeuwen 2007), the M1 star AU Mic hosts one of the closest and best studied debris disks. The detection of submillimeter emission (Liu et al. 2004) from this ∼10 Myr-old system in the β Pic moving group (Zuckerman et al. 2001) was followed quickly by the discovery of an edge-on disk seen in scattered starlight (Kalas et al. 2004). Subsequent work has characterized the scattered light in great detail, exploiting its proximity to constrain its radial and vertical structure (Liu 2004; Krist et al. 2005; Metchev et al. 2005; Graham et al. 2007; Fitzgerald et al. 2007). Observations of dust emission at (sub)millimeter wavelengths provide important, com- plementary information about debris disk structures. Unlike the small grains probed at op- tical and near-infrared wavelengths that react strongly to stellar radiation and wind forces, the large grains that dominate the millimeter-wave emission have dynamics more like the parent planetesimals. As a result, long-wavelength images trace best the location and dis- tribution of the larger colliding bodies (Wyatt 2006), and potentially also the signatures of planets that interact with them (Ertel et al. 2012). These size-dependent dust dynamics manifest beautifully in the edge-on AU Mic disk. Resolved millimeter-wave observations show an emission belt within the extended optical disk that peaks near a radius of 35 AU, where the midplane scattered light profile steepens dramatically (Wilner et al. 2012). These features are elegantly explained by the presence of a "birth ring" of planetesimals at that location, where small grains released in a collisional cascade are launched into an extended halo (Strubbe & Chiang 2006; Augereau & Beust 2006). With the advent of the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA), the millimeter emis- sion in nearby debris disks can be imaged in much greater detail (e.g., Boley et al. 2012). In -- 3 -- this Letter, we present new, sub-arcsecond resolution ALMA Cycle 0 observations of AU Mic at λ = 1.3 mm. The ALMA data provide substantially improved constraints on the locations of colliding planetesimals in the AU Mic disk and help shed light on the processes that may be shaping the planetesimal distribution. They also reveal a previously unknown, centrally located emission feature. 2. Observations AU Mic was observed by ALMA with its Band 6 receivers over four 2 hour-long "schedul- ing blocks" (SBs) in 2012 Apr and Jun. Table 1 summarizes the observations. The 16-20 operational 12-m antennas were arranged to span baseline lengths of 21 -- 402 m (correspond- ing to a maximum resolution of ∼0.′′6). The correlator was configured to optimize continuum sensitivity, processing two polarizations in four 2 GHz-wide basebands, each with 128 spectral channels, centered at 226, 228, 242, and 244 GHz. In each SB, we interleaved observations of AU Mic (pointing center α = 20h45m09.s34, δ = −31◦20′24.′′09, J2000, within 1′′ of the star position at all epochs) with the nearby quasar J2101−295. The data from each SB were calibrated independently within the CASA software package. After applying system temperature measurements and phase corrections from the water vapor radiometers, the data were flagged and averaged into 6.048 s integrations. A calibration of the spectral response of the system was determined from observations of J1924−292, and complex gain variations induced by atmospheric and instrumental effects were corrected using observations of J2101−295. The absolute flux calibration was derived from observations of Neptune: a mean calibration was applied to all basebands, with a systematic uncertainty of ∼10% (see §3.3). To generate an image at the mean frequency, 235 GHz (1.28 mm), we Fourier inverted the calibrated visibilities with natural weighting and performed a multi- frequency synthesis deconvolution with the CLEAN algorithm. The visibilities were further reduced by spectrally averaging over the central 112 channels in each baseband and re- weighted by the observed scatter. 3. Results and Analysis 3.1. Image of 1.3 mm Dust Continuum Emission Figure 1 shows an image of the λ = 1.3 mm emission from SB-4 (with the most antennas and best weather conditions), with synthesized beam 0.′′80 × 0.′′69 (8 × 7 AU), p.a. 49◦, and rms of 30 µJy beam−1. An image constructed from all 4 SBs is consistent but noisier, which -- 4 -- Fig. 1. -- ALMA image of the 1.3 mm continuum emission from AU Mic. The ellipse in the lower left corner represents the 0.′′80 × 0.′′69 (8 × 7 AU) synthesized beam. we attribute to systematic calibration issues resulting from the poorer weather conditions of the earlier observations. The emission is confined to a narrow band with aspect ratio >10:1, with an orientation consistent with the scattered light disk. The emission is not resolved in the direction perpendicular to the elongation. There are clear peaks near both extrema and in the middle of the structure (detected at all four epochs). The emission is marginally brighter at the northwest end than the southeast end, and shows small undulations along its length, though none of these variations are significant. We interpret the observed structure as a superposition of two components: (1) the nearly edge-on dust belt with limb-brightened ansae, and (2) a new, distinct, and compact feature located at the center of the belt. 3.2. Modeling Formalism Building on the phenomenological methodology of Wilner et al. (2011, 2012) to analyze resolved millimeter emission from debris disks, we construct a parametric model to quantify the observed properties of the AU Mic emission. We consider two model components: a vertically thin, axisymmetric "outer" belt, and an additional source to account for the central -- 5 -- peak. The belt component is informed by models of the scattered light that show the disk midplane within 50 AU is remarkably straight, .0.◦5 from edge-on, and thin (FWHM ∼0.′′3). We assume the belt is viewed at an inclination of 89.◦5. The belt is characterized as an annulus with (unprojected) radial intensity Iν(r) ∝ rx for ri < r < ro, with a normalization defined by Fbelt = R Iν dΩ, a center determined by offsets (relative to the pointing center) {∆α, ∆δ}, and an orientation described by a position angle (PA). We treat the central component as a circular Gaussian with mean ∆rcen, variance σ2 cen (half width at half maximum Rcen = √2 ln 2 σcen), and flux density Fcen. The mean ∆rcen is defined as a radial shift from the belt center in the plane of the belt. We also include power-law spectral scalings between the 4 basebands for each component, denoted αbelt and αcen, where Fν ∝ να. For a given parameter set, we compute four synthetic visibility sets sampled at the same spatial frequencies observed by ALMA, corresponding to the spectrally averaged basebands (at 226, 228, 242, and 244 GHz). By fitting the visibility data directly, we are not sensitive to the non-linear effects of deconvolution, and take advantage of the full range of available spatial frequencies. The fit quality is quantified by a likelihood metric, L, determined from the χ2 values summed over the real and imaginary components at all spatial frequencies (lnL = −χ2/2). A Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) approach was utilized to char- acterize the multi-dimensional parameter space of this model and determine the posterior probability distribution functions for each parameter. We used the affine-invariant ensemble sampler proposed by Goodman & Weare (2010), in a locally-modified version of the paral- lelized implementation described by Foreman-Mackey et al. (2012), to compute likelihood values for ∼106 MCMC trials. Uniform priors were assumed for all parameters, with bounds imposed to ensure that the model was well-defined: {Fbelt, Fcen, σ2 cen} ≥ 0, and 0 ≤ ri < ro. 3.3. Results of Model Fits The best-fit parameter values and their 68% uncertainties determined from the marginal- ized posterior probability distributions are listed in Table 2. The data and best-fit model are compared in the image plane in Figure 2; there are no significant residuals. The best-fit model has a reduced χ2 = 1.37 (905,920 independent datapoints, 12 free parameters). The modeling procedure was performed on each SB individually and the full dataset (all 4 SBs together). The results were entirely consistent, although the parameter uncertainties were notably smaller from the superior SB-4 dataset alone, and we focus on those results. Most parameters are determined with high precision. We find good agreement of the outer belt parameters {Fbelt, ri, ro} with the less well-constrained fits of Wilner et al. (2012), and on the disk PA from measurements of scattered starlight (e.g., Krist et al. 2005). We -- 6 -- Fig. 2. -- (left) The observed 1.3 mm emission from AU Mic, (center) the best-fit model (see §3.3), and (right) the imaged residuals. Contours are drawn at 4 σ (120 µJy beam−1) intervals. measure a flat spectrum for the outer belt (αbelt ≈ 0) across the 4 basebands, which corre- sponds to the difference between the spectral slopes of AU Mic and Neptune (αNeptune ≈ 2.1), consistent with data from 350 µm to 1.3 mm (Wilner et al. 2012). The central emission peak is detected with high confidence at Fcen = 320 µJy (>10 σ brighter than the outer belt at that location). It is unresolved, with Rcen ≤ 3.0 AU (3 σ), and positionally coincident with the outer belt center: ∆rcen ≤ 1.9 AU (3 σ). Regarding the outer belt, the most notable result is that the models strongly favor rising emission profiles with large, positive gradients: x ≈ 2.3 ± 0.3. Models with the standard assumption of x < 0 produce significant residuals, under-predicting the intensities at ±1-2′′ from the belt center. Because of the steep increase in the emission profile, there is only a weak constraint on the inner edge of the outer belt. The best-fit ri deviates from 0 at the ∼2 σ level: the 3 σ limit is ri ≤ 21 AU. 4. Discussion We have presented new, sub-arcsecond resolution ALMA observations of 1.3 mm emis- sion from the AU Mic debris disk and analyzed the data with a simple parametric model. This emission is resolved into two distinct components: (1) an edge-on outer belt with an emission profile that rises with radius out to 40 AU, and (2) an unresolved peak at the center of the outer belt. This distribution is more complex than the single, narrow ring often -- 7 -- assumed for debris disks. However, it has some similarities to other nearby resolved systems, like ǫ Eri (Backman et al. 2009) or HR 8799 (Su et al. 2009), that show an inner component inferred from excess infrared emission, separate from an extended and colder outer belt. 4.1. The Central Emission Peak The stellar photosphere is much fainter than the central peak noted in Figure 1. A NextGen stellar model (Hauschildt et al. 1999) with Teff = 3720 K, L∗ = 0.11 L⊙, and M∗ = 0.6 M⊙ (e.g., Metchev et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2005) that matches the AU Mic pho- tometry from 0.4 -- 25 µm contributes only F∗ = 52 µJy at 1.3 mm, ∼6× fainter than observed. However, AU Mic is an active star that exhibits radio-wave bursts. In quiescence, observa- tions find <120 µJy at 3.6 cm (White et al. 1994), and the contribution at 1.3 mm from hot coronal plasma seen in X-rays is unlikely to be significant (though better spectral constraints are desirable, see Leto et al. 2000). Flares are detected from AU Mic at ∼200-1200 µJy at 6 cm (Bower et al. 2009), but this non-thermal emission is much weaker at 1.3 mm. While the unknown variability makes any extrapolation to 1.3 mm problematic, the temporal prop- erties of the ALMA emission provide additional information. Radio-wave flares have fast decay times, of order an hour (Kundu et al. 1987); but, the mm-wave peak persists at a consistent intensity in all four ALMA observations, within uncertainties that are typically 2 − 3× larger than for SB-4, spanning timescales from 1 hour (within SB-4) to 2 months (SB-1 to SB-4). Unfortunately, the spectral index (αcen) constraints are not good enough to be diagnostic. We suspect that stellar emission is too weak and too ephemeral to be respon- sible for the 1.3 mm peak, but the available data does not allow for a firm determination of its contribution. Alternatively, the central emission peak could be produced by dust in a distinct (un- resolved) planetesimal belt located close to the star. In §3.3, we constrained the extent of this peak to Rcen ≤ 3 AU (3 σ), inside the inner working angle (0.′′8 ≈ 8 AU) of all previous high resolution imaging of scattered light (Krist et al. 2005; Fitzgerald et al. 2007). Rough models of the spectral energy distribution (SED) from the ALMA central peak can help assess the feasibility that it originates in an inner dust belt. In this context, the most salient feature of the AU Mic SED is the absence of emission excess at λ ≤ 25 µm (e.g., Liu et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2005). We assume the central peak represents the combined emission from the star and dust, such that Fdust = Fcen − F∗ ≈ 0.25 mJy at 1.3 mm. Optically thin dust emission at a temperature, T , has Fdust ≈ κνBν(T )Mdust/d2, where κν is the opacity spec- trum, Bν the Planck function, Mdust the mass, and d = 9.91 pc. For a given dust population characterized by κν, we computed the maximum T (and minimum Mdust) consistent with -- 8 -- both the observed millimeter flux density and the infrared SED. We calculated various κν for dust with the Weingartner & Draine (2001) "astrosilicate" composition and a power-law size distribution n(a) ∝ a−3.5 between amin = 0.2 µm (the blow-out size; Strubbe & Chiang 2006) and amax values from 1 µm to 1 cm. For amax ≤ 100 µm, models of the central peak over-predict the observed 60-70 µm emission if T > 35 K. However, larger grains with amax ≥ 1 mm at temperatures up to T ≈ 75 K can be accommodated without producing an excess at λ ≤ 25 µm. These maximum T values are comparable to the expected dust temperatures a few AU from the star, compatible with the emission size constraints (Rcen). The corresponding minimum Mdust is ∼9× 1023 g, about 1% of the lunar mass. These calcu- lations show that the central emission peak is consistent with a cool dust belt located .3 AU from the central star, with a total mass comparable to the asteroid belt in our Solar System. If this interpretation is correct, then ALMA observations at higher resolution can determine its properties. Interestingly, the temperature of this putative inner belt is colder than the ∼ 190 K found to apply systematically to inner belts around F5-K0 stars by Morales et al. (2011). 4.2. The Outer Dust Belt Our modeling of the ALMA data locates the far edge of the outer emission belt with high precision, ro = 40 AU, which matches closely the outer edge of the hypothesized "birth ring" of colliding planetesimals. This analysis does not define the shape of the edge below the ∼ 6 AU resolution limit, but the truncation is reminiscent of the outer edge of the classical Kuiper Belt (47 ± 1 AU; Trujillo & Brown 2001). The origins of such sharp edges remain unclear: they could be from dynamical interactions (Ida et al. 2000; Boley et al. 2012), or they may simply represent the initial conditions, where planetesimal formation was efficient and successful in the primordial disk. Adopting the opacity used in §4.1 (κν = 2.7 cm2 g−1), and assuming T ≈ 25 K (for 35-45 AU), the dust mass of this outer belt is 7×1025 g (consistent with previous estimates; Liu et al. 2004), ∼100× more massive than the hypothesized inner belt; the Kuiper Belt and asteroid belt have a similar mass ratio. The mm-wave emission morphologies of cold belts of dusty debris reflect the dynamical processes that shape the underlying planetesimal distributions. For AU Mic, our modeling suggests that its outer emission belt can be described by an increasing emission profile with a positive radial power-law index x ≈ 2.3±0.3. If we assume the emitting dust is in radiative equilibrium with a temperature profile T ∝ r−0.5, this implies a rising surface density profile, Σ ∝ r2.8, strongly peaked near 40 AU. A broad parent body ring with constant surface density would produce a radial intensity profile with x ≈ −0.5, a value ruled out with -- 9 -- high confidence (> 5σ). A rising behavior is predicted for "self-stirred" disks with ongoing planet formation (Kenyon & Bromley 2002); in particular, the models of Kennedy & Wyatt (2010) suggest Σ ∝ r7/3. However, the timescale required to assemble Pluto-sized bodies at ∼40 AU to initiate a collisional cascade around a low-mass star like AU Mic is much longer than its ∼10 Myr age (Kenyon & Bromley 2008). Moreover, this scenario does not naturally accommodate the presence of a separate, interior planetesimal belt. Of course, the still modest resolution of the data is compatible with more complex scenarios, such as multiple closely-spaced belts of different brightnesses that mimic a smooth gradient. Scattered light observations of the AU Mic disk show asymmetries on both large and small scales, with several peaks and depressions projected against the broad ansae in Figure 1, at radii beyond the millimeter undulations (features A-E; see Fitzgerald et al. 2007). With such a steep emission gradient in this outer belt, the data do not strongly constrain its width, or the location of its inner edge. Our modeling indicates substantial emission from mm-sized grains interior to 40 AU, in the ∼20-40 AU zone inferred to be highly depleted of µm-sized grains from polarized scattered light (Graham et al. 2007). The ALMA data show no clear evidence for asymmetries or substructure that would signal planet-disk interactions. The hints of modulating millimeter brightness along the belt in Figure 1 are insignificant in the residuals from subtracting a symmetric parametric model (see Figure 2). This rules out substructure brighter than 90 µJy beam−1 (3 σ), corresponding to dust clumps & 1% of the lunar mass (for the dust properties adopted above). Those limits argue against over-densities of dust-producing planetesimals trapped in mean motion resonances (Kuchner & Holman 2003), as might arise from the outward migration of planets (Wyatt 2003). Given the young age of the system, the broad and smooth character of the outer belt in the AU Mic disk may resemble the Kuiper Belt prior to the epoch of Neptune's migration (Malhotra 1995). It is interesting that none of the claims of millimeter emission clumps in debris disks have survived scrutiny at higher sensitivity (Pi´etu et al. 2011; Hughes et al. 2011, 2012). It may be that any such features are effectively erased by collisions (Kuchner & Stark 2010). We also find no significant centroid offset between the outer belt and central peak, as might result from the secular perturbations of a planet in an eccentric orbit (Wyatt et al. 1999). The limit on the displacement, ∆rcen < 1.9 AU (3 σ), corresponds approximately to a limit on ae, where a is the semi-major axis and e is the eccentricity. This limit can still accommodate a wide-orbit planet with modest eccentricity, similar to Uranus. Such a planet could be responsible for stirring the disk to 40 AU in ∼10 Myr (e.g. for a = 30 AU and e = 0.05, see eqn. 15 of Mustill & Wyatt 2009). Limits from high contrast direct imaging admit Saturn-mass planets at these separations (Delorme et al. 2012). -- 10 -- 4.3. Concluding Remarks The basic architecture of the AU Mic debris disk appears remarkably similar to the Solar System, with a potential analog to the asteroid belt at a few AU, and a colder, more massive, and apparently truncated counterpart of the Kuiper Belt extending to 40 AU. Future observations are needed to determine if stellar processes could be responsible for emission attributed to the asteroid belt, and to determine if the Solar System analogy extends to include a planetary system like our own. M.A.M. thanks NRAO for Student Observing Support funds. A.M.H. is supported by a fellowship from the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science. M.B. is funded through a Space Science Enhancement Program grant from the Canadian Space Agency and an NSERC Discovery Accelerator Supplement. E.C. acknowledges NSF grant AST-0909210. P.K. and J.R.G. acknowledge support from NSF Award 0909188 and NASA Award NNX11AD21G This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#2011.0.00142.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada) and NSC and ASIAA (Taiwan), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc. Facility: ALMA -- 11 -- Table 1. ALMA Cycle 0 Observations of AU Mic ID SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 Date (UT) Antennas PWV (mm) 2012 Apr 23 07:30 -- 09:26 2012 Apr 23 09:39 -- 11:03 2012 Apr 24 09:09 -- 11:19 2012 Jun 16 05:48 -- 08:02 17 16 18 20 1.7 1.7 3.0 0.7 Table 2. Model Parameters Parameter Description Best-Fit 68% Confidence Interval Fbelt x ri ro PA αbelt Fcen ∆rcen σ2 cen αcen ∆α ∆δ belt flux density (mJy) belt radial power law index belt inner radius (AU) belt outer radius (AU) belt position angle (◦) belt spectral index Gaussian flux density (mJy) Gaussian offset (AU) Gaussian variance (AU2) Gaussian spectral index R.A. offset of belt center (′′) Dec. offset of belt center (′′) 7.14 2.32 8.8 40.3 128.41 -0.15 0.32 0.71 ≤5.9 -0.35 0.61 -0.03 +0.12, -0.25 +0.21, -0.31 +11.0, -1.0 +0.4, -0.4 +0.12, -0.13 +0.40, -0.58 +0.06, -0.06 +0.35, -0.51 (3 σ limit) +2.1, -4.5 +0.02, -0.02 +0.02, -0.02 -- 12 -- REFERENCES Augereau, J.-C., & Beust, H. 2006, A&A, 455, 987 Backman, D., Marengo, M., Stapelfeldt, K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1522 Boley, A. C., Payne, M. J., Corder, S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, L21 Bower, G. C., Bolatto, A., Ford, E. B., & Kalas, P. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1922 Chen, C. H., Patten, B. M., Werner, M. W., et al. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1372 Delorme, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, 72 Ertel, S., Wolf, S., & Rodmann, J. 2012, A&A, 544, A61 Fitzgerald, M. P., Kalas, P. G., Duchene, G., Pinte, C., & Graham, J. R. 2007, ApJ, 670, 536 Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2012, arXiv:1202.3665 Goodman, J., & Weare, J. 2010, Comm. App. Math. Comp. Sci., 5, 65 Graham, J. R., Kalas, P. G., & Matthews, B. C. 2007, ApJ, 654, 595 Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., & Baron, E. 1999, ApJ, 512, 377 Hughes, A. M., Wilner, D. J., Andrews, S. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, 38 Hughes, A. M., Wilner, D. J., Mason, B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 82 Ida, S., Larwood, J., & Burkert, A. 2000, ApJ, 528, 351 Kalas, P., Liu, M. C., & Matthews, B. C. 2004, Science, 303, 1990 Kennedy, G. M., & Wyatt, M. C. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1253 Kenyon, S. J., & Bromley, B. C. 2002, ApJ, 577, L35 Kenyon, S. J., & Bromley, B. C. 2008, ApJS, 179, 451 Krist, J. E., Ardila, D. R., Golimowski, D. A., et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 1008 Kuchner, M. J., & Holman, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 588, 1110 Kuchner, M. J., & Stark, C. C. 2010, AJ, 140, 1007 -- 13 -- Kundu, M. R., Jackson, P. D., White, S. M., & Melozzi, M. 1987, ApJ, 312, 822 Leto, G., Pagano, I., Linsky, J. L., Rodon`o, M., & Umana, G. 2000, A&A, 359, 1035 Liu, M. C. 2004, Science, 305, 1442 Liu, M. C., Matthews, B. C., Williams, J. P., & Kalas, P. G. 2004, ApJ, 608, 526 Malhotra, R. 1995, AJ, 110, 420 Metchev, S. A., Eisner, J. A., Hillenbrand, L. A., & Wolf, S. 2005, ApJ, 622, 451 Morales, F. Y., Rieke, G. H., Werner, M. W., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, L29 Mustill, A. J., & Wyatt, M. C. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 1403 Pi´etu, V., di Folco, E., Guilloteau, S., Gueth, F., & Cox, P. 2011, A&A, 531, L2 Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 314 Strubbe, L. E., & Chiang, E. I. 2006, ApJ, 648, 652 Trujillo, C. A., & Brown, M. E. 2001, ApJ, 554, L95 van Leeuwen, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 653 Weingartner, J. C., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 548, 296 White, S. M., Lim, J., & Kundu, M. R. 1994, ApJ, 422, 293 Wilner, D. J., Andrews, S. M., & Hughes, A. M. 2011, ApJ, 727, L42 Wilner, D. J., Andrews, S. M., MacGregor, M. A., & Hughes, A. M. 2012, ApJ, 749, L27 Wyatt, M. C., Dermott, S. F., Telesco, C. M., et al. 1999, ApJ, 527, 918 Wyatt, M. C. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1321 Wyatt, M. C. 2006, ApJ, 639, 1153 Zuckerman, B., Song, I., Bessell, M. S., & Webb, R. A. 2001, ApJ, 562, L87 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
1106.3926	1	1106	2011-06-20T14:46:26	Rosetta-Alice Observations of Exospheric Hydrogen and Oxygen on Mars	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The European Space Agency's Rosetta spacecraft, en route to a 2014 encounter with comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, made a gravity assist swing-by of Mars on 25 February 2007, closest approach being at 01:54UT. The Alice instrument on board Rosetta, a lightweight far-ultraviolet imaging spectrograph optimized for in situ cometary spectroscopy in the 750-2000 A spectral band, was used to study the daytime Mars upper atmosphere including emissions from exospheric hydrogen and oxygen. Offset pointing, obtained five hours before closest approach, enabled us to detect and map the HI Lyman-alpha and Lyman-beta emissions from exospheric hydrogen out beyond 30,000 km from the planet's center. These data are fit with a Chamberlain exospheric model from which we derive the hydrogen density at the 200 km exobase and the H escape flux. The results are comparable to those found from the the Ultraviolet Spectrometer experiment on the Mariner 6 and 7 fly-bys of Mars in 1969. Atomic oxygen emission at 1304 A is detected at altitudes of 400 to 1000 km above the limb during limb scans shortly after closest approach. However, the derived oxygen scale height is not consistent with recent models of oxygen escape based on the production of suprathermal oxygen atoms by the dissociative recombination of O2+.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Rosetta-Alice Observations of Exospheric Hydrogen and Oxygen on Mars Paul D. Feldmana,∗, Andrew J. Stefflb, Joel Wm. Parkerb, Michael F. A'Hearnc, Jean-Loup Bertauxd, S. Alan Sternb, Harold A. Weavere, David C. Slaterf, Maarten Versteegf, Henry B. Throopb, Nathaniel J. Cunninghamg, Lori M. Feagac aJohns Hopkins University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 3100 N. Charles Street, bSouthwest Research Institute, Department of Space Studies, Suite 300, 1050 Walnut Street, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA Boulder CO 80302-5150 USA cDepartment of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park MD 20742-2421 USA dLATMOS, CNRS/UVSQ/IPSL, 11 Boulevard d'Alembert, 78280 Guyancourt, France eJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Space Department, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723-6099 USA fSouthwest Research Institute, P. O. Drawer 28510, San Antonio TX 78228-0510 USA gPhysics Department, Nebraska Wesleyan University, Lincoln, NE 68504-2794 USA Abstract The European Space Agency's Rosetta spacecraft, en route to a 2014 en- counter with comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, made a gravity assist swing- by of Mars on 25 February 2007, closest approach being at 01:54 UT. The Alice instrument on board Rosetta, a lightweight far-ultraviolet imaging spectrograph optimized for in situ cometary spectroscopy in the 750 -- 2000 A spectral band, was used to study the daytime Mars upper atmosphere including emissions from exo- spheric hydrogen and oxygen. Offset pointing, obtained five hours before closest approach, enabled us to detect and map the HI Lyman-a and Lyman-b emissions from exospheric hydrogen out beyond 30,000 km from the planet's center. These data are fit with a Chamberlain exospheric model from which we derive the hy- drogen density at the 200 km exobase and the H escape flux. The results are comparable to those found from the the Ultraviolet Spectrometer experiment on the Mariner 6 and 7 fly-bys of Mars in 1969. Atomic oxygen emission at 1304 A is detected at altitudes of 400 to 1000 km above the limb during limb scans shortly after closest approach. However, the derived oxygen scale height is not consistent with recent models of oxygen escape based on the production of suprathermal 1 2 . oxygen atoms by the dissociative recombination of O+ Keywords: Mars, Mars atmosphere, Atmospheres, evolution 1. Introduction The extended atomic hydrogen corona of Mars was first detected by the ultra- violet spectrometer experiments on the Mariner 6 and 7 spacecraft that measured resonantly scattered solar Lyman-a radiation (Barth et al., 1971) to a planetocen- tric distance of 24,000 km. This was followed by a similar experiment on the or- biting Mariner 9 mission (Barth et al., 1972). Anderson and Hord (1971), using radiative transfer theory, analyzed the early data to derive a hydrogen escape rate, which they found to be compatible with the water photodissociation rate at Mars. Barth et al. (1972) recognized that the apparently constant H escape rate derived from Mariner 6, 7, and 9, if extended backward over geological time scales, would result in an oxygen abundance in the lower atmosphere several orders of magni- tude larger than observed. McElroy (1972) suggested that dissociative recombi- nation of O+ 2 , the dominant ion in the atmosphere, would produce oxygen atoms with sufficient energy to escape. However, since the energetic oxygen atoms are mostly produced below the exobase, determination of the escaping fraction re- quires detailed modeling, represented by the recent work of Lammer et al. (2003), Fox and Ha´c (2009), Shematovich et al. (2007), Valeille et al. (2009, 2010), and others. Barth et al. (1971) also reported observations of O I l 1304 emission up to 700 km. These data, together with those from Mariner 9, were interpreted by Strickland et al. (1973) in terms of a cool, optically thick oxygen exosphere. Since then, the only measurement of exospheric oxygen on Mars is from the SPICAM instrument on Mars Express (Chaufray et al., 2009), but those data extended only up to 400 km where radiative transfer effects in the O I l 1304 multiplet are sig- nificant and the evidence for a hot component of O atoms was inconclusive. Until recently there have also been no additional measurements of the ex- tended hydrogen atmosphere on Mars. Chaufray et al. (2008), again with SPI- CAM, have measured H I Lyman-a emission at 1216 A, but only up to 4,000 km. Again, they find that a two temperature H exosphere is possible, although the ∗Corresponding author Email address: [email protected] (Paul D. Feldman) Preprint submitted to Icarus November 8, 2018 result is inconclusive. Clarke et al. (2009) also suggest a two-component H distri- bution from monochromatic Lyman-a images of Mars showing the H corona out to 4 Mars radii (RM) taken by the Solar Blind Channel of the Advanced Camera for Surveys on HST. Radiative transfer modeling is necessary to extract densities from both of these data sets. Clarke et al. also noted a variation in the Lyman-a brightness over a period of two months which they ascribe to a seasonal variation in the H2O loss rate. We report here on observations of both the extended hydrogen and oxygen coronae of Mars made with the Alice far-ultraviolet imaging spectrograph (Stern et al., 2007) on Rosetta during the spacecraft's gravity assist swing-by of Mars on 25 February 2007. Offset exposures enabled us to detect and map the H I Lyman-a and Lyman-b emissions to beyond 30,000 km from the planet's center. Moreover, except near the planet's limb, the Lyman-b emission is optically thin, allowing us to use a spherical Chamberlain model to determine the temperature and density of H at the exobase without the need for radiative transfer modeling. From limb pointings at spacecraft distances closer to the planet, oxygen emission above the exobase is detected, allowing us to constrain the density of hot oxygen without the need for radiative transfer modeling. These data can be used to derive atomic escape rates and address the question of stoichiometric loss of water vapor from Mars. 2. Observations Rosetta approached Mars from the day side making its closest approach (CA) at 01:54 UT on 25 February 2007 at an altitude of 250 km. In order to satisfy the scientific goals of the various remote sensing instruments (see, e.g., Coradini, 2010), the common instrument boresight was programmed for a number of fixed pointings towards both the sunlit and dark hemispheres of Mars and offset from Mars, as well as raster scans across the sunlit limb. Due to operational constraints, observations were not possible during the immediate CA period. The pointings of interest in this paper (denoted by the operational designation ALxx) were AL03 pre-CA, centered on the sunlit disk, AL10E, offset pointings centered 2.5◦ and 7.5◦ from Mars along the equator, and AL11B, scans across the illuminated cres- cent post-CA. Observation start times and geometry parameters are given in Ta- ble 1. At the time of closest approach, Mars was 1.445 AU from the Sun and the areocentric longitude, Ls, was 189.9◦. Solar activity was very low for an extended time, including when Earth faced the same solar longitude 9 days earlier, with F10.7 ≈72 at 1 AU. 3 Alice is a lightweight, low-power, imaging spectrograph optimized for in situ cometary far-ultraviolet (FUV) spectroscopy. It is designed to obtain spatially- resolved spectra in the 750-2000 A spectral band with a spectral resolution be- tween 8 and and 12 A for extended sources that fill its field-of-view. The slit is in the shape of a dog bone, 5.5◦ long, with a width of 0.05◦ in the central 2.0◦ while the ends are 0.10◦ wide. Each spatial pixel along the slit is 0.30◦. Alice employs an off-axis telescope feeding a 0.15-m normal incidence Rowland circle spectro- graph with a concave holographic reflection grating. The imaging microchannel plate detector utilizes dual solar-blind opaque photocathodes (KBr and CsI) and employs a two-dimensional delay-line readout. Details of the instrument are given by Stern et al. (2007). The Alice slit geometry, illustrating the shape of the multi-segment slit, is shown in Fig. 1 for the first pre-CA offset pointing of 2.5◦. The second offset moved the slit an additional 5.0◦ away from Mars parallel to the Martian equator. Except near the limb, the only features seen in the offset spectra are H I Lyman- , and these data are used to extract the spatial profiles of these and Lyman-b emissions. A similar diagram for the post-CA limb scans, beginning 25 February 2007 at UT 03:33:02, is shown in Fig. 2. At this time each spatial pixel projected to 280 km in altitude but as Rosetta receded from Mars the projected size of each pixel increased. The scan slowly shifted the boresight ∼250 km towards Mars over a 15-minute period. This is illustrated in Fig. 3. Because of the scanning motion, these spectra were acquired in "pixel-list" mode, that is the position of each photon count is recorded together with a time tag so that spectra could be reconstructed with the motion accounted for. Because the Rosetta-Alice instru- ment has only a single data buffer, the data gaps seen in Fig. 3 result from the time required to read out the buffer to the spacecraft. The typical time to fill the buffer was 30 s, so in practice we accumulated individual spectra corresponding to ∼30 s integrations. Even so, to detect O I emission at high altitudes, we need to co-add multiple spectra, as described below. 3. Data Analysis 3.1. Calibration During the gravity assist swing-bys of both Mars and the Earth, the Rosetta instruments were powered on and operated primarily to provide flight verifica- tion of instrument performance and to acquire calibration data such as standard ultraviolet star fluxes and detector flat-fields. There were also opportunities to 4 a exercise the full range of instrument parameters that could be adjusted by remote command in flight in order to optimize the signal-to-noise performance of the instrument. For the Mars swing-by, the detector high voltage level was set at -- 3.8 kV. Subsequent operations and analysis showed the optimum setting to be -- 3.9 kV and all observations beginning in the fall of 2007 were made at that volt- age. Nevertheless, by comparison of stellar standards at different voltages (and at different times), we are able to transfer the current absolute flux calibration to the epoch of the Mars swing-by and this is incorporated into the current version of the data pipeline (version 3) with which all of the data have since been processed. The data used in this study are publicly available, both from NASA's Planetary Data System (http://pdssbn.astro.umd.edu/) and ESA's Planetary Science Archive (http://www.rssd.esa.int/?project=PSA). To derive spatial profiles of the observed emissions requires an accurate flat- field calibration. This poses a rather acute problem for Lyman-a at 1216 A be- cause the instrument was designed for this wavelength to fall in the gap between the KBr and CsI photocathode coatings. The intent was to utilize the low detection efficiency of the bare microchannel plate to compensate for the very high expected Lyman-a photon flux from the comet. However, because of a slight misalignment in the coating edges, the Lyman-a sensitivity varies by a factor of two along the portion of the detector that is mapped onto the sky. In contrast, at Lyman-b the variation across the slit is ∼1.4. There is also a ±20% odd-even detector row effect that is accentuated at the lower detector high voltage of -- 3.8 kV. Fortuitously, following the Mars encounter, Rosetta-Alice was pointed to- wards Jupiter and recorded many hours of spectra in support of the New Hori- zons fly-by of Jupiter in February 2007. These observations were made with the same instrument parameters used for the Mars observations. Since, from the or- bit of Mars the Jovian system only filled a single row of the detector, high S/N measurements of detector flat-fields at Lyman-a and Lyman-b were obtained, to- gether with a measure of grating scattered Lyman-a as a function of detector row. An added bonus is that since Jupiter was only 20◦ away on the sky from the coordinates of the offset pointing, these observations provided a measure of the interplanetary Lyman-a and Lyman-b background for the Mars observations. We used a co-added accumulation of 630,000 s of data obtained between 1 March and 10 March 2007 to derive the flat-fields used in the analysis described below. 3.2. Mars dayglow spectrum We briefly discuss the dayglow spectrum of Mars, obtained under AL03 pre- CA. It consisted of four exposures, each of 1028 seconds. A composite of the 5 five central rows of the sum of four exposures is shown in Fig. 4. The viewing parameters are given in Table 1. At the start of the sequence, the angular diameter of Mars was 1.62◦ so that the five central rows of the detector were uniformly filled with the illuminated Martian disk. For comparison with previous work, we also show the Mars full disk spectrum recorded by the Hopkins Ultraviolet Tele- scope (HUT) on board the Space Shuttle in March 1995 (a full solar cycle earlier) (Feldman et al., 2000), convolved to the spectral resolution of Alice. At the time, Mars was 1.666 AU from the Sun, Ls was 70.5◦, and F10.7 was ≈75. The HUT spectrum is multiplied by a factor of 0.80 to match the brightness observed by Alice, and this is quite good agreement considering the Alice calibration uncer- tainty and the fact that the HUT spectrum measured the integrated disk brightness, not just a central stripe of the disk. The comparison also serves to validate the wavelength calibration and provides a reference spectrum with which to compare the exospheric spectra obtained in AL10E and AL11B. As noted by Barth et al. (1972) and Leblanc et al. (2006), with the exception of the H I Lyman series and O I l 1304, Mars' dayglow emissions, principally CO and C I, are confined to alti- tudes below ∼200 km. 3.3. Offset exposures The two offset exposures were taken immediately following the full disk spec- tra as Rosetta approached Mars. H I Lyman-b was detected along the full length of the Alice slit for both offsets. Because the slit is segmented, for each row along the slit the observed Lyman-b signal was fit to a gaussian profile superimposed on a grating-scattered background that was fit to a second-order polynomial. The flux was then obtained by integrating under the gaussian and then correcting for the detector flat-field that was derived from subsequent Jupiter observations as de- scribed in Section 3.1. The result is shown as a histogram in Fig. 5. The errors shown are statistical in the count rate. The Lyman-a profile is similarly derived except that the detector background, due to dark counts, was negligible, and is shown in Fig. 6. The shape of this profile is very similar to the slant intensity profiles derived from the Mariner 6 and 7 fly-bys by Barth et al. (1971), although lower in absolute brightness as the Mariner fly-bys occurred at a time of high solar activity. Neither Fig. 5 nor Fig. 6 have had the interplanetary background subtracted as did the plots of Barth et al. The model fits to the data are discussed below in Section 4.1. 6 3.4. Limb scan spectra From the data acquired in pixel list mode during the limb scans schematically illustrated in Fig. 3, we can extract a spectrum spanning a given time interval. However, because the line-of-sight of the spectrogram was changing its position above the limb with time, it is necessary to balance the motion with the need for a sufficiently long integration time to obtain an adequate signal-to-noise ratio for weak emission features. At the same time, we need to avoid contamination of the spectrum by thermospheric emissions. This was done by co-adding the photon counts from the first four exposures for row 14; the first 12 exposures for row 15; and the last 14 exposures for rows 16 and 17. This results in an altitude weighted average with a trapezoidal shape of ≈320 km centered at 420, 665, 910, and 1240 km, respectively for rows 14 to 17, respectively. Examples of extracted spectra for rows 15 and 16 are shown in Fig. 7. Note that only H I and O I emissions are detected. A possible feature at 1657 A in the row 15 spectrum that could be a signature of escaping carbon atoms (Fox and Ha´c, 1999; Cipriani et al., 2007), is most likely an instrumental artifact as no emission at this wavelength appears in the row 14 spectrum. The background is due to grating scattered Lyman-a , which is variable from row to row. Also, the spectra have not been corrected for the odd-even row variation noted in Section 3.1 which is estimated to be ∼25% for Lyman-b and ∼10% for O I l 1304, based on the disk observations discussed in Section 3.2. 4. Discussion 4.1. Exospheric hydrogen model For the analysis of the Lyman-b profile we follow the same procedure as Anderson and Hord (1971), using the exospheric model of Chamberlain (1963) but ignoring satellite orbits, as they can be excluded by the observed Lyman-b brightness near 30,000 km planetocentric distance. For solar minimum conditions we take the exobase to be at 200 km and the exobase temperature, Te, to be 200 K (Krasnopolsky, 2002; Fox and Ha´c, 2009), leaving the hydrogen density at this level as a variable. We assume that Lyman-b is optically thin and calculate a flu- orescence efficiency (g-factor) of 3.9 × 10−6 photons s−1 atom−1 at 1 AU using a solar minimum line profile and flux from Lemaire et al. (2002). The interplane- tary Lyman-b background is fixed at 1.0 rayleigh based on the subsequent Jupiter observations that were used to derive the detector flat-field at 1026 A (see Sec- tion 3.1). All fluxes are referenced to row 15 which is the nominal Alice boresight and which is used for almost all of the stellar calibration measurements. 7 The result is shown by the solid curve in Fig. 5. The derived H density at 200 km is 2.5 × 105 cm−3 and the escape flux is 7.8 × 107 cm−2 s−1. The model atmosphere is given in Table 2. Optical depth unity along the line-of-sight is at ∼5,000 km projected planetocentric distance. From the radiative transfer model of Anderson and Hord (1971), applied to the Mariner Lyman-a data, we expect the single scattering intensity to be about a factor of two higher than the radiative transfer corrected intensity at this optical depth, and this is consistent with the data shown in Fig. 5. Anderson and Hord, for their solar maximum observations, assuming Te = 350 K at an exobase altitude of 250 km, found an H density and escape flux of 3.0 × 104 cm−3 and 1.8 × 108 cm−2 s−1, respectively. Fig. 5 also shows a model for 260 K (dashed line), which, normalized at 30,000 km, provides what superficially appears to be a better fit to the observed profile. While it is difficult to choose between the models for planetocentric distances greater than 10,000 km, the absence of a strong optical depth effect in the latter suggests that the lower temperature model, corresponding to a typical exospheric temperature at solar minimum, is probably correct. For 260 K, the H density and escape flux are 9.0 × 104 cm−3 and 1.34 × 108 cm−2 s−1, respectively. The same models, applied to Lyman-a using a Lyman-a ratio of 250 derived from the IPM measurements, are shown in Fig. 6. The agreement is excel- lent and the deviation from the optically thin emission is consistent with an optical depth along the line-of-sight of 1 at 10,000 km planetocentric distance. There is no apparent need for a suprathermal H component as suggested by Chaufray et al. (2008) and Clarke et al. (2009). /Lyman-b An interesting measurement of exospheric Lyman-a emission from Mars Ex- press has recently been reported by Galli et al. (2006). They found that the Neutral Particle Detector of the ASPERA-3 experiment was sensitive to Lyman-a photons and measured a signal, attributed to exospheric hydrogen, out to a tangent height of 7,250 km above the Martian limb. Considering their large measurement uncer- tainties that include calibration, statistics, pointing, and background subtraction, their measured emission profile is in general accord with the Alice data shown in Fig. 6. However, they interpret this profile in terms of an optically thin resonance scattering model and derive an apparent temperature > 600K. As noted above, we find that the Lyman-a emission is optically thick below 10,000 km planetocentric distance (∼6,600 km above the limb), which leads to a flatter spatial distribution and consequently the appearance of a higher than actual exospheric temperature. 8 4.2. Two-component oxygen model For oxygen we use a two-component model, again taking for the cold com- ponent, Te, to be 200 K, and an oxygen density at 200 km of 3.0 × 107 cm−3 (Fox and Ha´c, 2009). The curve in Fig. 8 represents an added hot component of 1200 K with an oxygen density at 200 km of 1.0 × 105 cm−3 (see Table 2). The density decrease with altitude is considerably faster than the predictions of recent exospheric models of Chaufray et al. (2009) and Valeille et al. (2010) based on a hot atomic O source due to dissociative recombination of O+ 2 , and which are necessary to support a stoichiometric escape of water vapor from the atmosphere of Mars. However, it has been noted that such inferences from a single viewing geometry during a period of low solar activity can be misleading as this mecha- nism is quite sensitive to solar activity and is dependent on solar zenith angle at the observation point. Nevertheless, the present observations raise concern about some of the as- sumptions and physical parameters used in the recent modeling of oxygen escape from Mars. Fox and Ha´c (2009), in their comparison of exobase and Monte Carlo models, summarize the literature on modeling efforts from the past few decades and conclude that "efforts to balance the escape rates in the stoichiometric propor- tion of water are premature." Fox and Ha´c focus on a comparison of escape rates and therefore do not compute the oxygen density profiles from their models. Such calculation is warranted by the present data which would allow for a determination of the line-of-sight column densities appropriate to the Alice observations. Similar questions arise in the analogous modeling of the hot oxygen environ- ment around Venus (Groller et al., 2010). Bovino et al. (2011) discuss the need for accurate data on energy transfer collisions between hot oxygen atoms and the neutral atmosphere (they are mainly interested in helium) which is at the core of the escape models. Finally, we note that Simon et al. (2009) point out that an ad- ditional constraint on the models might be provided by SPICAM measurements of the forbidden O I l 2972 (1S -- 3P) line, which is produced by both photodisso- 2 . ciation of CO2 and by dissociative recombination of O+ 5. Conclusion The Rosetta swing-by of Mars on 25 February 2007, provided the first spec- troscopic observations of exospheric hydrogen and oxygen on Mars from outside Mars' atmosphere since the Mariner 6 and 7 fly-bys in 1969. The spatial distribu- tion of H I Lyman-a out to beyond 30,000 km from the planet's center is similar to 9 that found from Mariner 6 and 7. A Chamberlain model, with current solar mini- mum model values of exospheric temperature of 200 K and an exobase altitude of 200 km, provides a good fit to the observed Lyman-b profile, although the data do not exclude temperatures up to ∼260 K. A suprathermal component, suggested by several authors, is not needed to match the data. The hydrogen escape flux derived from the 200 K model, 7.8 ×107 cm−2 s−1, is comparable to that derived from the earlier measurements. The distribution of atomic oxygen, derived from 1304 A emission observed to altitudes of 1000 km above the limb, is not consistent with recent models of oxygen escape based on the production of suprathermal oxygen atoms by dissociative recombination of O+ 2 . Acknowledgments We thank the ESA Rosetta Science Operations Centre (RSOC) and Mission Operations Center (RMOC) teams for their expert and dedicated help in planning and executing the Alice observations of Mars. We thank Darrell Strobel for help- ful discussions. The Alice team acknowledges continuing support from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory through contract 1336850 to the Southwest Research Institute. The work at Johns Hopkins University was supported by a sub-contract from Southwest Research Institute. 10 References Anderson, Jr., D.E., Hord, C.W., 1971. Mariner 6 and 7 ultraviolet spectrometer J. Geophys. Res. 76, experiment: Analysis of hydrogen Lyman-alpha data. 6666 -- 6673. Barth, C.A., Hord, C.W., Pearce, J.B., Kelly, K.K., Anderson, G.P., Stewart, A.I., 1971. Mariner 6 and 7 ultraviolet spectrometer experiment: Upper atmosphere data. J. Geophys. Res. 76, 2213 -- 2227. Barth, C.A., Stewart, A.I., Hord, C.W., Lane, A.L., 1972. Mariner 9 Ultravi- olet Spectrometer Experiment: Mars Airglow Spectroscopy and Variations in Lyman Alpha. Icarus 17, 457 -- 468. Bovino, S., Zhang, P., Gianturco, F.A., Dalgarno, A., Kharchenko, V., 2011. En- ergy transfer in O collisions with He isotopes and Helium escape from Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, 2203. Chamberlain, J.W., 1963. Planetary coronae and atmospheric evaporation. Planet. Space Sci. 11, 901 -- 960. Chaufray, J.Y., Bertaux, J.L., Leblanc, F., Qu´emerais, E., 2008. Observation of the hydrogen corona with SPICAM on Mars Express. Icarus 195, 598 -- 613. Chaufray, J.Y., Leblanc, F., Qu´emerais, E., Bertaux, J.L., 2009. Martian oxy- gen density at the exobase deduced from O I 130.4-nm observations by Spec- troscopy for the Investigation of the Characteristics of the Atmosphere of Mars on Mars Express. J. Geophys. Res. 114, 2006. Cipriani, F., Leblanc, F., Berthelier, J.J., 2007. Martian corona: Nonthermal sources of hot heavy species. J. Geophys. Res. 112, 7001. Clarke, J.T., Bertaux, J., Chaufray, J., Gladstone, R., Quemerais, E., Wilson, J.K., 2009. HST Observations Of The Extended Hydrogen Corona Of Mars. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 41, 49.11 (abstract). Coradini, A., et al., 2010. Martian atmosphere as observed by VIRTIS-M on Rosetta spacecraft. J. Geophys. Res. 115, 4004. Feldman, P.D., Burgh, E.B., Durrance, S.T., Davidsen, A.F., 2000. Far-Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of Venus and Mars at 4 A Resolution with the Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope on Astro-2. Astrophys. J. 538, 395 -- 400. 11 Fox, J.L., Ha´c, A., 1999. Velocity distributions of C atoms in CO+ dissocia- tive recombination: Implications for photochemical escape of C from Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 24729 -- 24738. Fox, J.L., Ha´c, A.B., 2009. Photochemical escape of oxygen from Mars: A com- parison of the exobase approximation to a Monte Carlo method. Icarus 204, 527 -- 544. Galli, A., Wurz, P., Lammer, H., Lichtenegger, H.I.M., Lundin, R., Barabash, S., Grigoriev, A., Holmstrom, M., Gunell, H., 2006. The Hydrogen Exospheric Density Profile Measured with ASPERA-3/NPD. Space Sci. Rev. 126, 447 -- 467. Groller, H., Shematovich, V.I., Lichtenegger, H.I.M., Lammer, H., Pfleger, M., Kulikov, Y., Macher, W., Amerstorfer, U.V., Biernat, H.K., 2010. Venus' atomic hot oxygen environment. J. Geophys. Res. 115, 12017. Krasnopolsky, V.A., 2002. Mars' upper atmosphere and ionosphere at low, medium, and high solar activities: Implications for evolution of water. J. Geo- phys. Res. 107, 5128. Lammer, H., Lichtenegger, H.I.M., Kolb, C., Ribas, I., Guinan, E.F., Abart, R., Bauer, S.J., 2003. Loss of water from Mars:Implications for the oxidation of the soil. Icarus 165, 9 -- 25. Leblanc, F., Chaufray, J.Y., Lilensten, J., Witasse, O., Bertaux, J., 2006. Mar- tian dayglow as seen by the SPICAM UV spectrograph on Mars Express. J. Geophys. Res. 111, E09S11. Lemaire, P., Emerich, C., Vial, J.C., Curdt, W., Schuhle, U., Wilhelm, K., 2002. Variation of the full Sun hydrogen Lyman-a and b profiles with the activity cycle, in: Wilson, A. (Ed.), From Solar Min to Max: Half a Solar Cycle with SOHO, Noordwijk: ESA SP-508. pp. 219 -- 222. McElroy, M.B., 1972. Mars: An Evolving Atmosphere. Science 175, 443 -- 445. Shematovich, V.I., Tsvetkov, G.A., Krestyanikova, M.A., Marov, M.Y., 2007. Stochastic models of hot planetary and satellite coronas: Total water loss in the Martian atmosphere. Solar System Res. 41, 103 -- 108. 12 Simon, C., Witasse, O., Leblanc, F., Gronoff, G., Bertaux, J., 2009. Dayglow on Mars: Kinetic modelling with SPICAM UV limb data. Planet. Space Sci. 57, 1008 -- 1021. Stern, S.A., Slater, D.C., Scherrer, J., Stone, J., Versteeg, M., A'Hearn, M.F., Bertaux, J.L., Feldman, P.D., Festou, M.C., Parker, J.W., Siegmund, O.H.W., 2007. Alice: The Rosetta Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph. Space Sci. Rev. 128, 507 -- 527. Strickland, D.J., Stewart, A.I., Barth, C.A., Hord, C.W., Lane, A.L., 1973. Mariner 9 ultraviolet spectrometer experiment: Mars atomic oxygen 1304- A emission. J. Geophys. Res. 78, 4547 -- 4559. Valeille, A., Combi, M.R., Tenishev, V., Bougher, S.W., Nagy, A.F., 2010. A study of suprathermal oxygen atoms in Mars upper thermosphere and exosphere over the range of limiting conditions. Icarus 206, 18 -- 27. Valeille, A., Tenishev, V., Bougher, S.W., Combi, M.R., Nagy, A.F., 2009. Three- dimensional study of Mars upper thermosphere/ionosphere and hot oxygen corona: 1. General description and results at equinox for solar low conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 114, 11005. 13 Table 1: Observation Parameters. Observation ID Start time (UT 2007) Boresight pointing Distance to Marsa (km) Solar elongationa Longitude of tangent point at limbb Latitude of tangent point at limbb Solar zenith angle at tangent pointb Data mode Total integration time (s) aAt start of observation. bAt sub-observer point for AL03. AL03 AL10E AL11B 24 Feb 18:28:14 disk center 239,800 164.3◦ 213.9◦ -- 1.8◦ 15.7◦ Histogram 4112 24 Feb 20:13:14 offset 2.5◦, 7.5◦ W 25 Feb 03:33:02 E limb scan 184,200 164.0◦ 149.7◦ -- 4.1◦ 74.3◦ Histogram 483 + 1028 51,600 24.3◦ 263.6◦ -- 26.5◦ 67.9◦ Pixel list 14 Table 2: Model Atmosphere Densities. O (cold) (cm−3) 3.00 × 107 6.86 × 104 288.0 2.04 0.023 3.7 × 10−4 O (hot) (cm−3) 1.00 × 105 3.70 × 104 1.49 × 104 6520. 3080. 1550. 830. Altitude (km) 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 H (cm−3) 2.50 × 105 1.69 × 105 1.19 × 105 8.61 × 104 6.42 × 104 4.90 × 104 3.82 × 104 3.03 × 104 2.44 × 104 1.99 × 104 4330. 1590. 757. 422. 144. 67.5 37.5 23.2 15.5 15 FIGURE CAPTIONS Fig. 1. Projection of the Alice slit on the sky with the common boresight offset 2.5◦ from the center of Mars along the equator. Orange grid lines outline the illuminated region of the disk. The shape of the multi-segment slit is shown. Detector row numbers increase from left to right with the boresight (+) in row 15. Fig. 2. Projection of the Alice slit on Mars at the beginning of the limb scans following closest approach. Orange grid lines outline the illuminated crescent of the disk. Detector row numbers increase from right to left with the boresight (+) in row 15. Fig. 3. Projection of individual rows of the Alice slit above the Mars limb dur- ing the slow limb scan following closest approach. Initially, each spatial pixel projected to 280 km in altitude but as Rosetta receded from Mars the projected size of each pixel increased. The scan also slowly shifted the boresight ∼250 km towards Mars over a 15-minute period. The cross-hatched areas indicate the time during which photon events were accumulated while the horizontal lines show the times for which photon events were co-added for each row. Fig. 4. The dayglow spectrum of Mars is a composite of the five central rows of four exposures, each of 1028 seconds. For comparison with previous work, we also show the Mars full disk spectrum recorded by the Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope (HUT) at 4 A spectral resolution in March 1995 (a full solar cycle earlier) (Feldman et al., 2000), convolved to the spectral resolution of Alice and multiplied by a factor of 0.8. Fig. 5. H I Lyman-b was detected along the full length of the Alice slit for both offsets. The data are shown as a histogram: black, 2.5◦ offset, red: 7.5◦ offset. The errors shown are statistical in the count rate. Optically thin Chamberlain models without satellite orbits for T=200 K (solid line) and 260 K (dashed line) are shown, superimposed on a 1 rayleigh interplanetary background. The radius of Mars is indicated. Fig. 6. Same as Fig. 5 for H I Lyman-a . The shape of this profile is very similar to the slant intensity profiles derived from the Mariner 6 and 7 fly-bys by Barth et al. (1971), although lower in absolute brightness as the Mariner fly-bys occurred at a time of high solar activity. The same models are shown, superimposed on an 16 interplanetary background of 250 rayleighs. Fig. 7. Extracted limb scan spectra. For row 15 (top), the photon counts from the first 12 exposures (376 s, see Fig. 3) were co-added. For row 16 (bottom), the last 14 exposures (476 s) were co-added. Only H I and O I emissions are detected. Fig. 8. Extracted O I l 1304 brightness from rows 14 -- 17 as a function of altitude above the Martian limb. The vertical bars illustrate the extent of the trapezoidal altitude weighting function for each row while the horizontal bars are the statis- tical uncertainty in the count rate. The two-component oxygen model shown is described in the text. 17 Figure 1: Projection of the Alice slit on the sky with the common boresight offset 2.5◦ from the center of Mars along the equator. Orange grid lines outline the illuminated region of the disk. The shape of the multi-segment slit is shown. Detector row numbers increase from left to right with the boresight (+) in row 15. 18 Figure 2: Projection of the Alice slit on Mars at the beginning of the limb scans following closest approach. Orange grid lines outline the illuminated crescent of the disk. Detector row numbers increase from right to left with the boresight (+) in row 15. 19 Row 16 Row 15 Row 14 Row 13 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 ) m k ( b m i l s r a M e v o b a e c n a t s D i −200 30 35 40 Time from 2007−02−25T03:00 (minutes) 45 50 Figure 3: Projection of individual rows of the Alice slit above the Mars limb during the slow limb scan following closest approach. Initially, each spatial pixel projected to 280 km in altitude but as Rosetta receded from Mars the projected size of each pixel increased. The scan also slowly shifted the boresight ∼250 km towards Mars over a 15-minute period. The cross-hatched areas indicate the time during which photon events were accumulated while the horizontal lines show the times for which photon events were co-added for each row. 20 CI CI CO A−X OII OI OI OI OI Lyg Lyb +OI CO CO ArI 10 8 6 4 2 0 ) 1 − Å s h g e y a R l i ( s s e n t h g i r B 800 1000 1200 Wavelength (Å) 1400 1600 1800 Figure 4: The dayglow spectrum of Mars is a composite of the five central rows of four exposures, each of 1028 seconds. For comparison with previous work, we also show the Mars full disk spectrum recorded by the Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope (HUT) at 4 A spectral resolution in March 1995 (a full solar cycle earlier) (Feldman et al., 2000), convolved to the spectral resolution of Alice and multiplied by a factor of 0.8. 21 Lyman−b 10 l i ) s h g e y a r ( s s e n t h g i r B 1 RMars Planetocentric Distance (x103 km) 10 Figure 5: H I Lyman-b was detected along the full length of the Alice slit for both offsets. The data are shown as a histogram: black, 2.5◦ offset, red: 7.5◦ offset. The errors shown are statistical in the count rate. Optically thin Chamberlain models without satellite orbits for T=200 K (solid line) and 260 K (dashed line) are shown, superimposed on a 1 rayleigh interplanetary background. The radius of Mars is indicated. 22 l i ) s h g e y a r ( s s e n t h g i r B Lyman−a 10000 1000 100 RMars Planetocentric Distance (x103 km) 10 Figure 6: Same as Fig. 5 for H I Lyman-a . The shape of this profile is very similar to the slant intensity profiles derived from the Mariner 6 and 7 fly-bys by Barth et al. (1971), although lower in absolute brightness as the Mariner fly-bys occurred at a time of high solar activity. The same models are shown, superimposed on an interplanetary background of 250 rayleighs. 23 ) 1 − Å s h g e y a R l i ( s s e n t h g i r B ) 1 − Å s h g e y a R l i ( s s e n h g i r t B Lyg Lyb OI row 15 1000 1200 Wavelength (Å) 1400 1600 Lyg Lyb OI row 16 5 4 3 2 1 0 5 4 3 2 1 0 1000 1200 Wavelength (Å) 1400 1600 Figure 7: Extracted limb scan spectra. For row 15 (top), the photon counts from the first 12 exposures (376 s, see Fig. 3) were co-added. For row 16 (bottom), the last 14 exposures (476 s) were co-added. Only H I and O I emissions are detected. 24 ) m k ( e d u t i t l A 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 1 10 OI 1304 Brightness (Rayleighs) 100 1000 Figure 8: Extracted O I l 1304 brightness from rows 14 -- 17 as a function of altitude above the Martian limb. The vertical bars illustrate the extent of the trapezoidal altitude weighting function for each row while the horizontal bars are the statistical uncertainty in the count rate. The two- component oxygen model shown is described in the text. 25
1502.05035	1	1502	2015-02-17T20:59:18	The APOGEE Spectroscopic Survey of Kepler Planet Hosts: Feasibility, Efficiency, and First Results	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	The Kepler mission has yielded a large number of planet candidates from among the Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs), but spectroscopic follow-up of these relatively faint stars is a serious bottleneck in confirming and characterizing these systems. We present motivation and survey design for an ongoing project with the SDSS-III multiplexed APOGEE near-infrared spectrograph to monitor hundreds of KOI host stars. We report some of our first results using representative targets from our sample, which include current planet candidates that we find to be false positives, as well as candidates listed as false positives that we do not find to be spectroscopic binaries. With this survey, KOI hosts are observed over ~20 epochs at a radial velocity precision of 100-200 m/s. These observations can easily identify a majority of false positives caused by physically-associated stellar or substellar binaries, and in many cases, fully characterize their orbits. We demonstrate that APOGEE is capable of achieving RV precision at the 100-200 m/s level over long time baselines, and that APOGEE's multiplexing capability makes it substantially more efficient at identifying false positives due to binaries than other single-object spectrographs working to confirm KOIs as planets. These APOGEE RVs enable ancillary science projects, such as studies of fundamental stellar astrophysics or intrinsically rare substellar companions. The coadded APOGEE spectra can be used to derive stellar properties (T_eff, log(g)) and chemical abundances of over a dozen elements to probe correlations of planet properties with individual elemental abundances.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Accepted in AJ - 16 Feb. 2015 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 THE APOGEE SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY OF KEPLER PLANET HOSTS: FEASIBILITY, EFFICIENCY, AND FIRST RESULTS Scott W. Fleming1,2, Suvrath Mahadevan3,4, Rohit Deshpande3,4, Chad F. Bender3,4, Ryan C. Terrien3,4, Robert C. Marchwinski3,4, Ji Wang5, Arpita Roy3,4, Keivan G. Stassun6,7, Carlos Allende Prieto8,9, Katia Cunha10,11, Verne V. Smith12, Eric Agol13, Hasan Ak14,3, Fabienne A. Bastien3,15, Dmitry Bizyaev16, Justin R. Crepp17, Eric B. Ford3,4, Peter M. Frinchaboy18, Domingo An´ıbal Garc´ıa-Hern´andez8,9, Ana Elia Garc´ıa P´erez19, B. Scott Gaudi20, Jian Ge21, Fred Hearty3, Bo Ma21, Steve R. Majewski19, Szabolcs M´esz´aros22, David L. Nidever23,19, Kaike Pan16, Joshua Pepper24,6, Marc H. Pinsonneault20, Ricardo P. Schiavon25, Donald P. Schneider3,4, John C. Wilson19, Olga Zamora8,9, Gail Zasowski26,27 Accepted in AJ - 16 Feb. 2015 ABSTRACT The Kepler mission has yielded a large number of planet candidates from among the Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs), but spectroscopic follow-up of these relatively faint stars is a serious bottleneck in confirming and characterizing these systems. We present motivation and survey design for an ongoing project with the SDSS-III multiplexed APOGEE near-infrared spectrograph to monitor hundreds of KOI host stars. We report some of our first results using representative targets from our sample, which include current planet candidates that we find to be false positives, as well as candidates listed as false positives that we do not find to be spectroscopic binaries. With this survey, KOI hosts are observed over ∼ 20 epochs at a radial velocity precision of 100 − 200 m s−1. These observations can easily identify a majority of false positives caused by physically-associated stellar or substellar binaries, and in many cases, fully characterize their orbits. We demonstrate that APOGEE is capable of achieving RV precision at the 100 − 200 m s−1 level over long time baselines, and that APOGEE's multiplexing capability makes it substantially more efficient at identifying false positives due to binaries than other single-object spectrographs working to confirm KOIs as planets. These APOGEE RVs enable ancillary science projects, such as studies of fundamental stellar astrophysics or intrinsically rare substellar companions. The coadded APOGEE spectra can be used to derive stellar properties (Teff , log g) and chemical abundances of over a dozen elements to probe correlations of planet properties with individual elemental abundances. [email protected] 1 Computer Science Corporation, 3700 San Martin Dr, Balti- more, MD, 21218, USA 2 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Bal- timore, MD, 21218, USA 3 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsyl- vania State University, 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA 4 Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds, The Pennsyl- vania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 5 Department of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA 6 Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA 7 Department of Physics, Fisk University, Nashville, TN 37208, USA 8 Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias (IAC), E-38200 La La- guna, Tenerife, Spain 9 Departamento de Astrof´ısica, Universidad de La Laguna, E- 38206 la Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 10 Observatorio Nacional-MCTI, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20921- 400, Brazil 11 Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 12 National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA 13 Department of Astronomy, Box 351580, University of Wash- ington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 14 Faculty of Sciences, Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey 15 Hubble Fellow 16 Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349-0059, USA 17 University of Notre Dame, Department of Physics, 225 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA 18 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX 76129, USA 19 Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Char- lottesville, VA 22904-4325, USA 20 Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 21 Astronomy Department, University of Florida, 211 Bryant Space Sciences Center, Gainesville, FL 32111, USA 22 ELTE Gothard Astrophysical Observatory, H-9704 Szom- bathely, Szent Imre herceg st. 112, Hungary 23 Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 830 Dennison, 500 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042, USA 24 Lehigh University, Department of Physics, 16 Memorial Drive East, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA 25 Astrophysics Research Institute, IC2, Liverpool Science Park, Liverpool John Moores University, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liv- erpool, L3 5RF, UK 26 Department of Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins Uni- versity, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 27 NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow 2 Scott W. Fleming et al. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Kepler's Planet Candidates 2011). 2010; Gilliland et al. The Kepler spacecraft's primary mission is to deter- mine the frequency of Earth-sized exoplanets orbiting in the habitable zone of their parent stars (Borucki et al. 2010; Koch et al. 2010), with a second objective of studying a wide variety of stellar astrophysics via as- teroseismology (e.g., Chaplin et al. In ad- dition, the high precision photometry (∼ 80 ppm over 6-hour timescales for the brightest (Kp . 15) dwarfs, Caldwell et al. 2011; Christiansen et al. 2012) enables studies of giant exo- planets and a wide variety of variable stars. Its photo- metric band Kp covers 423 - 897 nm and is similar to, but broader than, a combined V and R band (Koch et al. 2010). To find exoplanets, Kepler makes use of the tran- sit method, which detects planet candidates by mea- suring the flux loss that occurs when a planet crosses the face of its parent star. However, there are several sources of false positives that must be taken into account when analyzing these candidates, most notably: graz- ing eclipsing binaries (EBs), EBs (including hierarchical triples) whose eclipse depths are diluted by another star through flux contamination, brown dwarfs or low mass stars that have radii comparable to giant exoplanets, and even larger exoplanets that transit a fainter star within the photometric aperture. Because of these sources of false positives, the Kepler team makes a very clear distinction between candidate exoplanets and those that have been dynamically con- firmed through spectroscopic radial velocity (RV) mea- surements or through photodynamical modeling (e.g., Holman et al. 2010; Carter et al. 2011). Kepler Ob- jects of Interest (KOIs) consist of candidate exoplanets, eclipsing binaries, and known false positives. Those KOIs that are not known to be false positives or EBs are re- ferred to as "active planet candidates" (Borucki et al. 2011a,b; Batalha et al. 2013), but for simplicity, we will refer to such Kepler planet candidates as "KPCs" throughout the rest of this paper. An intermediate level of classification consists of "validated" exoplanets, which have very low probabilities of being blended EBs as de- termined through a Monte Carlo statistical analysis of the Kepler photometry (e.g., Torres et al. 2011). As of October 2014, there are a total of 4229 KPCs amongst 3251 Kepler stars 1 , but only ∼ 20% (653) of the stars host multiple KPCs. It is estimated that as many as 15-26% of transiting planets may have clearly detected transit timing variations (Ford et al. 2012), which allow for mass determinations photometrically. Even still, a majority of KPCs will require RV obser- vations to confirm their planetary nature. Such time- series RV observations are resource intensive, so effi- cient identification of false positive candidates is neces- sary to ensure efficient follow-up of likely planets. In addition to aiding in the confirmation of KPCs, robustly determining the false positive rate amongst KPCs is re- quired when conducting statistical analyses of this pop- ulation. A number of studies have attempted to per- form such analyses, including investigations of planet 1 http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/ ExoTables/nph-exotbls?dataset=cumulative_only frequency as functions of orbital periods and stellar host properties (Borucki et al. 2011b; Youdin 2011; Howard et al. 2012), and studies of the eccentricity dis- tribution (Moorhead et al. 2011). Aside from the false positive rate of KPCs, knowledge of the host star(s) intrinsic properties (e.g., mass, radius, effective temperature, surface gravity, metallicity) is re- quired to determine the masses and radii of the exoplan- ets, as well as to conduct studies of planetary properties as functions of these stellar parameters. The Kepler In- put Catalog (KIC, Brown et al. 2011) provides a pho- tometrically derived Teff , log g, [Fe/H] and E(B−V) for every star within Kepler 's field of view through a combi- nation of calibrated fluxes using {g, r, i, z} filters similar to the original SDSS filters (Fukugita et al. 1996) and a narrow-band D 51 filter modeled after the Dunlap Obser- vatory DD 51 filter. The catalog was originally used to inform target selection for the mission, but in the absence of a comprehensive spectroscopic survey of all ∼ 150, 000 Kepler stars, the catalog's stellar parameters have been used in analyses of planet candidates. There are ongoing efforts to provide improved stellar parameters of Kepler targets by aggregating photometry, spectroscopy, aster- oseismology, and transit analyses (Huber et al. 2014). The majority of false positive KPCs are expected to be caused by astrophysical sources rather than random or systematic errors, specifically, EBs whose eclipse depths are similar to that expected from a transiting planet (Borucki et al. 2011b). Fig. 1 demonstrates six of the most common sources of transiting KPC scenarios. In each panel, the larger (yellow) star is the suspected KPC host, and all objects within the panels are assumed to be within the aperture used to create the Kepler lightcurve. Each Kepler "optimal aperture" is variable, but is typ- ically many arcseconds in size (Twicken et al. 2010). The dashed circles represent a spectrograph fiber's field- of-view (FoV, not to scale). The titles in each panel also denote, qualitatively, how often the given scenarios can be characterized by time-series RVs at modest precision (∼ 100 m s−1 level). Note that in addition to stellar eclipses being diluted to look like giant planets, transits of giant planets can also be diluted to look like smaller planets. 1.2. Sources Of False Positives Scenarios 1, 2, 4 and 6 all involve a physical companion orbiting the KPC host star. In these scenarios, RV obser- vations can detect the presence of grazing EBs (Scenario 1), EBs that are diluted by light from a third star within the Kepler aperture, but resolved on-sky with the spec- trograph (Scenario 2), or consist of a very low-mass star (VLMS) or brown dwarf companion (Scenario 4), a ma- jority of the time. An important sub-category of Scenar- ios 1 and 4 include EBs whose orbits produce only a sec- ondary eclipse and no primary eclipse (Santerne et al. 2013). These false positives may be more common for longer period KPCs, where a companion star in an ec- centric orbit is more likely to undergo secondary eclipse near periastron, but exhibit no primary eclipse. In addi- tion, the most massive, bona fide planets at short orbital periods will induce a Doppler velocity shift detectable at the ∼ 100 m s−1 level (Scenario 6). In those rare cases, their planetary nature will be confirmed through the APOGEE RVs by phasing them to the Kepler -derived APOGEE Spectroscopy of the Kepler Field 3 !"#Grazing EB - Most 2. Diluted EB - Most 3. Unresolved EB - None 4. VLMS / BD - Most 5. Close Triples - Some 6. Planet - Rarely Figure 1. The most common scenarios that can produce a lightcurve consistent with a transiting planet. The titles qualita- tively identify those scenarios that can be detected by a RV survey at the level of ∼ 100 m s−1 ("Most", "Some", etc.). In each panel, the larger (yellow) star is the assumed KPC host star, while the dashed circles represent a spectrograph's FoV (not to scale). All sources in each panel lie within the Kepler photometric aperture, which is typically many arcseconds in size. In Scenario 3, the term "unresolved" refers to the fact that the EB is unresolved in the Kepler aperture. In Scenario 6, only short-period, massive planets would be detected with APOGEE. Note that giant planets can also be diluted to look like smaller-sized planets in these scenarios. orbital period. Stellar systems that are either physical multiples or vi- sual companions with small separations on-sky, and con- sist of an EB, are represented by Scenario 5. In this scenario, the diluted EB is only detectable if the flux of at least one component of the EB pair is sufficiently high that it appears in the cross-correlation function, or if the combined mass of the EB pair induces a sufficient velocity shift on the third (brightest) star in the system. When the EB pair is composed of cooler K or M dwarf stars in the presence of a hotter primary, they are easier to detect in the NIR than in the optical, since the flux contrast is reduced in the H band (e.g., Kepler-16, Bender et al. 2012). For a binary system composed of dwarf stars at a signal-to-noise of 100, secondaries with mass ratios down to ∼ 0.1 are detectable in the H band (Bender & Simon 2008), while mass ratios are limited to ∼ 0.5 in the op- tical. The detection limit for a given system depends on the number of stellar components within the aperture (e.g., is it a binary versus a triple system?), and whether any of those components are evolved (observing in the NIR is beneficial for components of differing Teff ratios, not for brightness differences due to differing radii). Scenario 3 represents a Kepler -unresolved EB, where the variable star is within the Kepler aperture, but is exterior to the spectrograph's FoV relative to the KPC host star. This is the only scenario where RV observa- tions will be not be able to detect any false positives, unless the RV survey targets every star within a given KPC's Kepler aperture. Fortunately, Scenarios 2, 3 and 5 can sometimes be tested photometrically with time- series photometry from the ground at greater spatial res- olutions (e.g., Col´on et al. 2012). In addition, these are also the scenarios that are more likely to be solved us- ing Kepler data alone, e.g., by searching for flux centroid shifts. 1.3. Paper Outline 2010) In this paper, we introduce our program to ob- serve hundreds of KPCs using the Apache Point Ob- servatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE, Majewski et al. spectrograph (Wilson et al. 2010, 2012) on the Sloan 2.5 m telescope (Gunn et al. 2006), recently finished as part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III (SDSS-III, Eisenstein et al. 2011) and con- tinuing in SDSS-IV (2014-2020). Our program provides an efficient means of determining the false positive rate of KPCs due to physically-associated binary stellar sys- tems. At the same time, these spectra are used in a variety of projects concerning the false positives them- selves, including characterization of the orbits and mea- surements of the mass ratios for many of the spectro- scopic binaries (SBs), or orbital characterization of in- trinsically rare, massive (M & 10 MJup), substellar com- panions such as brown dwarfs and massive gas giant plan- ets (Marcy & Butler 2000; Sahlmann et al. 2011). For KPCs that remain viable, host star properties such as Teff, log g, and chemical abundances for dozens of ele- ments can be derived using the APOGEE spectra. In Section 2 we describe the APOGEE instrument and main survey, the methods used to derive RVs from its spectra, and its current RV precision floor. In Section 3.1 we present RVs of five current and former KOIs ob- served during SDSS-III. Three of these happened to be observed as part of a separate APOGEE EB program, and we present some conclusions on the nature of those KOIs as a precursor to our larger KPC campaign. We also present the first results from our APOGEE-Kepler KOI campaign, using the (since confirmed) exoplanet host KIC 6448890 to test our long-term RV precision, and definitively identifying KIC 6867766 as a false posi- tive exoplanet. In Section 3.2 we compare the efficiency of a sur- vey using a high resolution, NIR, multi-object spec- trograph against other planet-hunting spectrographs: HARPS-North, which is a clone of HARPS-South with some improvements (Mayor et al. 2003), Keck HIRES (Vogt et al. 1994), SOPHIE (Perruchot et al. 2008), and HET HRS (Tull 1998). We demonstrate that by using a multiplexing instrument in the NIR to conduct a survey at modest RV precision (100 m s−1), false pos- itives can be identified more efficiently compared to the single-object instruments, reserving telescope time on those other resources for confirmation of the remaining KPCs at significantly higher precision. In Section 4 we review other techniques for determining the false positive rate of Kepler KPCs, and highlight the science enabled by extracting abundances from the coadded APOGEE spectra. We summarize our findings in Section 5. 2. APOGEE SURVEY OVERVIEW APOGEE is a survey of Milky Way stars using a multi- object, fiber-fed, NIR spectrograph housed in a vacuum cryostat, that can observe up to 300 objects simultane- ously, producing R ∼ 22500 spectra covering a wave- length range of 1.51−1.68 µm using a volume phase holo- graphic grating mosaic. Details of the instrument design can be found in Wilson et al. (2010) and Wilson et al. (2012). Typically the instrument achieves a signal-to- noise ratio per pixel of 100 (∆λ ∼ 0.1 − 0.17A) on an H = 11 star in a single visit (one hour of total in- tegration). Most stars are observed on a minimum of 4 Scott W. Fleming et al. ing. Critically, these pipeline-derived RVs only work for simple cross-correlation functions, and are expected to fail when there is contamination from multiple stellar spectra, as in the case for most binary stars. As such, we derive our own RVs using additional, interactive process- ing of the data. These steps include manually correcting residual OH sky emission lines, selecting templates from a finer grid, and interactively fitting cross-correlation peaks, which may often be asymmetric or have multi- ple components in the case of binary stars. We cal- culate uncertainties for our RV measurements following the maximum-likelihood procedure laid out by Zucker (2003). This approach derives an analytical relationship between the cross-correlation function and it's first and second derivatives to account for uncertainty contribu- tions related to the sampling and sharpness of the corre- lation peak, and the signal-to-noise of the target and tem- plate spectra. The RVs are then fit using a custom wrap- per to the RVLIN software package (Wright & Howard 2009), which includes the ability to fit both components of a double-line spectroscopic binary through an itera- tive approach, and forces some orbital parameters to be identical between both components (e.g., orbital period, eccentricity, epoch of periastron). In some cases we make use of our IDL-based Levenberg-Marquardt fitting code used in Bender et al. (2012). 3. RESULTS 3.1. Initial Case Studies We have selected five KOIs with diverse histories and current statuses to test and develop our analysis pipelines. Three of these targets were observed as part of an SDSS-III ancillary program studying Kepler EBs (Mahadevan et al. 2015) (hereafter MAH2015). These targets were at one point Kepler planet candidates, but were determined to be likely EBs by the time the MAH2015 observations began. Note that since these KOI hosts were observed through a different program, the total number of epochs for these targets is less than the number of epochs that the SDSS-Kepler KOI pro- gram obtains (the SDSS-III EB program obtained 3 − 6 epochs for each target, compared to > 18 epochs for the SDSS-III KOI program). The two other KPC hosts presented here come from our SDSS-III Kepler KOI pro- gram. We summarize our findings on these targets to demonstrate the diversity of astrophysical configurations encountered in our spectroscopic observations. 3.1.1. SDSS-III EB Program: KIC 1571511 KIC 01571511 (KOI 362, Kp = 13.42, H = 12.04), consists of an F-type dwarf and low-mass M dwarf (Ofir et al. 2012), and was observed as part of MAH2015. The orbital period is 14.0224519 days and the radius as estimated in the NExScI KOI catalog2 is 14.7 ± 6.4 R⊕. The eclipses of such a low-mass star (∼ 2% decrease in flux during primary eclipse) are com- parable to those expected for a gas giant planet. Indeed, this star was originally suspected to be an overlooked gas giant exoplanet (Coughlin et al. 2011; Ofir et al. 2012). In the specific case of KIC 01571511, there is a small secondary eclipse (∼ 0.05%) detected in the Kepler 2 http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu Figure 2. Kepler module footprints with APOGEE FoV (circles, 2.98◦ diameters) from our SDSS-III Kepler EB and KOI programs. Five additional Kepler modules will be observed by APOGEE in SDSS-IV. three different nights, so that short-period binaries can be flagged. Each field on the sky is normally observed in multiples of three, ranging from 3 to 24 epochs, with brighter targets swapped for new stars after three obser- vations. Aluminum plug plates hold optical fibers that carry the star light from the telescope into the instru- ment. The primary science goal of the survey is to study the Milky Way by measuring radial velocities and chem- ical abundances of ∼ 105 red giant stars, but a vari- ety of additional science projects are included. A sum- mary of the project can be found in Allende Prieto et al. (2008b). A detailed description of the survey will ap- pear in Majewski et al. (2015). Details of the target selection for the survey in SDSS-III can be found in Zasowski et al. (2013). The telescope's field-of-view (FoV) covers a circular area 1.49◦ in radius, which matches well to the size of a given Kepler module. Fig. 2 shows the Kepler mod- ules' footprints, along with the three SDSS FoVs for our programs observed during SDSS-III. A total of 163 KPC host stars are observed in the SDSS-III KOI field (blue). Those targets were selected from all KPCs that had H < 14, 153 of which were dispositioned as planet "candidates" as of August 2013 (four others were con- firmed exoplanets, six were not dispositioned yet). As can be seen, a single SDSS footprint covers most of a Kepler module's FoV. In addition to the KPC hosts ob- served during SDSS-III, five additional Kepler modules will be observed in SDSS-IV. The APOGEE data processing pipeline is described in Nidever et al. (2015). Basic steps include collaps- ing the detector exposures for each of the three NIR arrays from 3D data cubes to 2D images, flat fielding, aperture extraction, wavelength calibration, sky subtrac- tion, telluric correction, and measurement of RVs. The RVs currently calculated by the automated pipeline make use of a grid of synthetic spectra calculated from AT- LAS9 stellar model atmospheres (M´esz´aros et al. 2012; Zamora et al. 2015). The mean, internal RV precision of the pipeline-produced relative RVs is ∼ 100 m s−1, al- though it does depend on signal-to-noise, spectral type, and level of residual systematics from the data process- APOGEE Spectroscopy of the Kepler Field 5 Figure 3. APOGEE RVs of the Kepler EB KIC 01571511 and the best-fit model from Ofir et al. (2012) shown as the solid line. A constant offset between the model and the APOGEE RVs has been applied to account for a zero-point offset. For the given Kepler pe- riod and epoch of transit, it is clear even with just three APOGEE RVs that the object is not a planet, because the change in RV over a short fraction of the orbit is much greater (∼ 10 km s−1) than expected for a planetary mass. lightcurve, which can be used to derive an estimate of the relative Teff ratio between the primary and secondary, and can therefore be used to help determine whether the object is a likely stellar companion. However, there is no guarantee that an EB system with a primary eclipse will also show a secondary eclipse, nor that the secondary eclipse is detectable even with Kepler's precision. In fact, Santerne et al. (2012) found that some of their false pos- itive KPCs were EBs in eccentric orbits for which only the shallower, secondary eclipses are present, but were mistaken as planetary transits across the primary. Fortunately, these EBs are fairly trivial to detect spec- troscopically, as demonstrated in Fig. 3. In this fig- ure, we plot the best-fit RV model from the analysis by Ofir et al. (2012), noting that there is a typo in the value of ω1 in their Table 3 that is missing a mi- nus sign. We also plot the three APOGEE RVs obtained through the ancillary program (Table 1). Only a con- stant offset between the model and APOGEE data is included to account for instrumental zero-point differ- ences. Even with three data points, the RV variation observed in the APOGEE RVs is inconsistent with a gi- ant planet, given the period and epoch of transit from the Kepler lightcurve, because the change in RV over a short fraction of the orbit is much greater (∼ 10 km s−1) than expected for a planetary mass. These data also demonstrate that APOGEE is capable of producing RVs at the ∼ 100 − 200 m s−1 for H ∼ 12 stars based on the rms residual to the well-determined orbital solution from Ofir et al. (2012). KIC 1571511 corresponds to Scenario 4 in Fig. 1, where a low-mass star generates an eclipse depth comparable to that expected from a giant planet. 3.1.2. SDSS-III EB Program: KIC 3848972 KIC 3848972 (KOI 1187, Kp = 14.49, H = 12.80) is listed in both the EB and KOI catalogs, and was observed as part of MAH2015. As a KOI, the target was listed as a "False Positive" in the Q1-Q8 catalog, but is currently absent in the Q1-Q16 catalog. The KOI Q1-Q8 catalog Figure 4. Orbital phase-folded RVs for KIC 3848972, using the period and ephemeris values from the KOI Q1-Q8 Catalog (left) and EB Catalog (right). The period ambiguity arises from whether the system is treated as an object that only produces a primary transit (KOI solution), or an eclipsing binary that produces both a primary and secondary eclipse with similar depths (EB solution). No significant RV variation is seen beyond a few hundred m s−1, disfavoring a physically bound stellar companion at either of these orbital periods as the source of the Kepler signal. lists a period of P = 0.37052915 days, while the EB cat- alog lists a period that is twice as long (P = 0.741057 days). The estimated radius reported in the KOI cata- log is 3.53 ± 0.93 R⊕. Where the EB Catalog assumes two nearly-equal eclipses from primary and secondary eclipse events, the KOI catalog reports half the orbital period and defines the secondary eclipse as undetected or absent. Multi-color, ground-based photometry was observed by Col´on et al. (2012) using a tunable filter on the OSIRIS instrument on the 10.4-m Gran Telesco- pio Canarias (GTC). They find a consistent star-planet radius ratio (2σ) in both their blue and red filters, but measure a statistically significant (5.8σ) difference in the eclipse depths. Interestingly, the color differences during eclipse suggest that the secondary component is bluer than the primary. Only three APOGEE spectra were obtained for this target as part of MAH2015, however, a check on bina- rity can still be performed provided the orbital phase coverage is reasonable. We conduct a one-dimensional cross-correlation using a K-type dwarf template (Teff = 5000K). We do not see evidence for any significant ro- tational broadening greater than ∼ 10 − 20 km s−1. Al- though the APOGEE spectra for this star are somewhat noisy, we find a single, very stable CCF peak with no RV variation greater than a few hundred m s−1 (Table 1). There is no obvious correlation with orbital phase after folding on both the KOI and EB Catalog periods and ephemerides, despite spanning ∼ 80% of the KOI or- bital phase and ∼ 20% of the EB Catalog orbital phase, respectively (Fig. 4). If the signal was caused by a hot- ter (bluer) secondary orbiting a brighter primary, the expected RV amplitude should be many tens of km s−1. Another possible explanation is that the observed Ke- pler signal comes from an object transiting a low-mass, cool (red) star that is within the photometric aperture (constrained to be ra < 2′′ given the Col´on et al. (2012) GTC aperture), but too faint to detect spectroscopically with APOGEE in the presence of the bright primary star. In this case, the color-dependent transit depths are caused because the fainter, redder component is the one being transited, hence the overall color of the com- bined light appears to shift towards the blue during the transit event. Intrigued by this possibility, we obtained Keck adaptive optics (AO) imaging to search for a fainter companion that might be the source of the Kepler signal. The AO image was acquired on UT 2014 Jul 17, 6 Scott W. Fleming et al. Morton & Johnson (2011), we can estimate the prob- ability of having a blend source within a given aper- ture using a model of the galactic population from TRI- LEGAL3 (Girardi et al. 2012). We generate a TRI- LEGAL population in a one square degree area cen- tered on KIC 3848972 with the default settings (see Appendix A). We calculate a mean stellar density of 0.004581 stars arcsec−2 within Kepler magnitudes 15.49 ≤ Kp ≤ 21.26. This magnitude range is cho- sen because it represents stars faint enough to be un- detected in the Kepler aperture but still able to pro- duce a transit depth of δ = 0.00196. With this mean density, the probability of just finding a potential blend source within this magnitude range is 5.8% within 2′′(the GTC photometric aperture) and just 0.36% within 0.′′5 (the area least probed by the Keck AO images, Fig. 5). From Morton & Johnson (2011), the probability that this blend source is an EB with a configuration that could mimic a transiting planet signal is on the order of 2.5E-4, so the probability of having a background EB as the source of this KPC is on the order of {9E-7, 1.4E- 5} within {0.5, 2.0} arcseconds, respectively. Thus, the more likely EB false positive scenario is a bound eclipsing binary causing the transit signal. The lack of observed RV variability indicates this KOI is not due to a physically bound stellar companion orbit- ing the brightest component of the KIC 3848972 system, while the Keck AO images constrain any bound, diluted EB to be either within ∼ 0.5′′ of the primary, or more than 5 magnitudes fainter than the primary in the Ks band. Given the Col´on et al. (2012) observations, we hypothesized that this KOI corresponded to Scenario 2 or 5 in Fig. 1, but our observations rule out Scenario 2 and tightly constrain the separation of a diluted EB under Scenario 5. 3.1.3. SDSS-III EB Program: KIC 3861595 KIC 3861595 (KOI 4, Kp = 11.43, H = 10.27) is listed in both the EB and KOI catalogs, and was observed as part of MAH2015. As a KOI, the target was initially listed as a "False Positive" in the Q1-Q8 catalog, and is currently listed as "Not Dispositioned" in the Q1-Q16 catalog. The orbital period is 3.8493724 days and the estimated planet radius is 11.8 ± 1.6 R⊕. Some ground- based observations have been conducted and reported at the Kepler Community Follow-up Program (CFOP) website4. These include several optical spectra from the TRES spectrograph (Szentgyorgyi & Fur´esz 2007) that indicated the star was a rapid rotator (40-50 km s−1), and potentially variable at a level of a few hundreds of m s−1. Imaging from the 1-m Nickel telescope at Lick Observatory and Keck HIRES guider images show two nearby stars within ten arcseconds of the target. Both nearby stars appear to be approximately 6 magnitudes fainter than the target. In addition to six APOGEE spectra, MAH2015 ob- tained five optical spectra for this target using the High Resolution Spectrograph (HRS) on the Hobby-Eberly Telescope. The HRS was used in the 30,000 resolution mode, with the 316 g/mm grating at a central wave- 3 http://stev.oapd.inaf.it/cgi-bin/trilegal_1.6 4 https://cfop.ipac.caltech.edu/home/ Figure 5. Upper limits on secondary companion mass from Keck AO imaging. The photometric aperture used by Col´on et al. (2012) is marked by the vertical line, and serves as the outer limit of where the eclipsing object might lie. using NIRC2 (instrument PI: Keith Matthews) and the Keck II Natural Guide Star (NGS) AO system (Wizinowich et al. 2000). We used the narrow cam- era setting with a plate scale of 10 mas pixel−1, which provides a fine spatial sampling of the instrument point spread function (PSF). The observing conditions were excellent, with a seeing of 0′′.3. KIC 3848972 was ob- served at an airmass of 1.12. We used the KS filter to acquire the image using a 3-point dither method. At each dither position, we took a total of 10 coadds composed of 5-second exposures. The total on-source integration time is therefore 150 seconds. The raw NIRC2 data were processed using standard techniques to replace bad pixels, flat-field, subtract ther- mal background, align, and coadd frames. We calculated the 5σ detection limit as follows. We first defined a series of concentric annuli centered on the star. For the con- centric annuli, we calculated the median and standard deviation of flux for pixels within these annuli. We define the 5σ detection limit as five times the standard devia- tion above the median flux. Representative 5σ detection limits are {1.6, 3.3, 5.0, 5.4} magnitudes for projected separations of {0′′.1, 0′′.2, 0′′.5, 1′′}, respectively. We translate the 5σ upper limits on companion bright- ness into upper limits on companion mass using the SED models compiled in Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007), assum- ing the secondary is a bound companion and that differ- ential extinction between the two spectral types is mini- mal in the Ks band. For a given absolute Ks magnitude of the primary, the contrast curve from the Keck AO data gives a lower limit for the secondary's absolute Ks mag- nitude, which we then interpolate into a mass using the Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007) models. We adopt primary spectral types of G0 and K5 as conservative upper and lower limits based on our spectroscopic cross-correlation analysis. We are able to rule out any bound companions more massive than 0.2 M⊙ at the 5σ level exterior to 0.2 arcseconds (Fig. 5). the transit signal could be caused by a fainter background or foreground star that is physically unassociated with KIC 3848972, but still within the Kepler photometric aperture. Following Alternatively, APOGEE Spectroscopy of the Kepler Field 7 length of λ0 = 5936 A. The HET spectra were re- duced using our optimal extraction pipeline described in MAH2015. We find a good template match (for both HET and APOGEE) using a mid-F spectral template rotationally broadened to 40 km s−1, in agreement with the CFOP notes from the TRES observations. The es- timated spectroscopic rotation rate of ∼ 40 km s−1, combined with an estimated rotation rate of 5.65-5.8 days (Hirano et al. 2012; Rhodes & Budding 2014), re- sults in an equatorial radius of ∼ 4.5 R⊙, some- what larger than the spectroscopically determined ra- dius of 2.727 ± 0.504 R⊙ (Buchhave et al. 2012) and the Stellar Parameter Catalog's value of 2.992+0.469 −0.743 R⊙ (Huber et al. 2014), which also uses the spectroscopic stellar parameters of Buchhave et al. (2012), but tie the stellar parameters to Dartmouth stellar evolution models (Dotter et al. 2008). We cross-correlate the HET and APOGEE spectra with mid-F spectral templates rotationally broadened to 40 km s−1. For this target, we used subsections of the APOGEE spectrum (1.515-1.560 µm, 1.586-1.605 µm, 1.615-1.635 µm, and 1.6475-1.6775 µm) to avoid several of the broadest lines. We find a single-peaked, broad cross-correlation function, with RV variation at the ∼ 1 km s−1 level (Table 1). We note that the RV scatter is larger than most of the A and F stars observed by Lagrange et al. (2009). However, phase- folding and fitting both sets of RVs at the orbital period and ephemerides found in the KOI and EB catalogs fails to resolve a signal of orbital motion from a bound com- panion at that period. In fact, we find that if we fit each set of RVs separately, fix the period and ephemeris to the KOI values, and force the eccentricity to zero, the best-fit RV semiamplitudes differ by a factor of 2.5 (Fig. 6). A color-dependent semiamplitude may signal a blended spectrum (Scenar- ios 2 or 5); the redder component can affect the line shapes more significantly in the NIR, but such scenarios are particularly challenging to identify in rapidly rotating stars using only a handful of observations. Nevertheless, we undertake a full line bisector analysis of both HET and APOGEE spectra. After creating custom numerical stellar template masks for both the HET and APOGEE wavelength ranges, we calculate the bisectors of the cross- correlation function, similar to the procedure described in Wright et al. (2013). We are limited to using three of the six APOGEE observations because they were the only ones observed on the same plug fiber, and there- fore should have the same intrinsic profile. The bisectors appear to be varying both in shape and position (indi- cating a cause other than bulk motion of the primary) and the bisector inverse slope (BIS) seems well-correlated with both RV and CCF FWHM (Fig. 7). However, the rapidly-rotating nature of this star causes difficulty in establishing the CCF continuum, and complicates bisec- tor analysis. Any attempt to calculate errors on the BIS leads to overestimation, and therefore we are hesitant to quantify this result beyond saying that a blend scenario is possible. We can not definitively show the transit signal is caused by a spectroscopic blend with so few bisector mea- surements. Our HET RVs are consistent with a planetary companion in a circular orbit, but there are not enough Figure 6. Phase-folded RVs for APOGEE (red) and HET (blue). Each set were fit with the orbital period and transit ephemeris fixed to the KOI value. Eccentricity is forced to zero. We find that while both sets of RVs appear to be in-phase with the or- bital parameters, the RV semiamplitudes are quite different. This suggests the spectrum might be blended (Scenarios 2 or 5 in Fig. 1): the APOGEE spectra can be more sensitive to such a blend if the temperatures of the blended components are different. Line bisector variations also suggest a blend, but is not definitive due to the small number of observations. It is also possible that the uncertainties are underestimated due to the rapid rotation of the star (40 km s−1). 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 h h t t p p e e D D e e g g a a t t n n e e c c r r e e P P 0 0 −40 −30 −20 −10 −40 −30 −20 −10 Velocity (km/s) Velocity (km/s) 0 0 80 60 40 20 h t p e D e g a t n e c r e P 0 −12−10 −8 −6 −4 −2 0 2 Velocity (km/s) ) s / m k ( S B I −15 −20 −25 −30 −35 ) s / m k ( S B I 0 −2 −4 −6 −33 −32 −31 −30 Velocity (km/s) −33 −32 −31 −30 Velocity (km/s) ) s / m k ( M H W F ) s / m k ( M H W F 94 92 90 88 86 84 52 50 48 46 −30 Velocity (km/s) −29 −28 −30 Velocity (km/s) −29 −28 Figure 7. Bisector analysis for the three APOGEE spectra that were on a common fiber (top row) and HET spectra (bottom row). The grey data point in the HET plots represents a low signal- to-noise observation. (Left: ) Bisectors of the cross-correlation function, shifted by measured radial velocities. Colors are based on bisector inverse slope (BIS) values. Percentage depth is a proxy for flux, and does not span the full range from 0 to 1 because of continuum ambiguities. (Middle: ) Correlation between BIS and measured RV. (Right: ) Correlation between FWHM of the CCF, and measured RV. Uncertainties are determined from the measurement variation between echelle orders (for HET spectra) and between the three detectors (for APOGEE spectra). Note that difficulty in defining the CCF continuum probably leads to an overestimation of the BIS errors. RVs to make a firm claim. The APOGEE RVs contradict this claim, but RV uncertainties for rapid rotators have not been thoroughly vetted, so the APOGEE RV un- certainties reported in Table 1 could be underestimated. We also note that an analysis by Rhodes & Budding (2014) found that an Algol-type background binary, ap- proximately 6.5 magnitudes fainter but within the Kepler photometric aperture, could produce a lightcurve similar 8 Scott W. Fleming et al. φ (Phase-Folded On KOI T0 ) 0.20308 0.35796 0.5319 0.68369 KIC 6867766 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 r e w o P F C C d e z i l a r o N Figure 8. The long-term RV rms of the confirmed exoplanet host star KIC 68448890 demonstrates we are able to achieve relative RV precision at the 100 m s−1 level. to what's observed. This scenario, which corresponds to Scenario 3 in Fig. 1, also remains a possibility given the companions seen in the Lick and Keck images at this approximate flux ratio. This KOI is a prime example as to why it is sometimes necessary to obtain multiple spectra when searching for exoplanet false positives; ob- taining just a few spectra, even at orbital quadratures, may not be sufficient to confidently identify a blended stellar binary, especially for systems that are rapid rota- tors. Additional spectroscopic observations will be able to study the line bisectors and RVs in sufficient detail to determine the nature of this intriguing KOI. 3.1.4. SDSS-III KOI Program: KIC 6448890 KIC 6448890 (KOI 1241, Kp = 12.44, H = 10.33) is a system with two exoplanets that have been confirmed via transit timing variations (Steffen et al. 2013). The two planets have orbital periods of 10.5016 and 21.40239 days, radii of 0.581 and 0.874 RJupiter, and masses of 0.07 and 0.57 MJupiter (Huber et al. 2013). The RV semi- amplitude is too small to be detectable with APOGEE, so this target (H = 10.33) is an opportunity to test the long-term RV precision level for our KOI program. Fig. 8 shows that the RV rms about the mean is 78 m s−1 over the entire baseline, in support of our stated goal to achieve a long-term (1-2 year), relative RV precision of ∼ 100 m s−1. The APOGEE RVs are reported in Table 1. 3.1.5. SDSS-III KOI Program: KIC 6867766 KIC 6867766 (KOI 1798, Kp = 14.38, H = 12.99) was listed in the Q1-Q6 KOI catalog as an exoplanet candidate but has since been listed as "Not Disposi- tioned" in later catalogs. This KOI is also listed in the EB catalog. A shallow, 0.3% transit signal is present with no obvious secondary feature at an orbital period of 12.964725 days. The estimated radius from the KOI catalog is 9.65 ± 1.5 R⊕. This target was observed a to- tal of 25 times with APOGEE as part of our Kepler KOI program within SDSS-III. We found the best 1D CCF template match using a Teff = 5500 K, solar-metallicity dwarf rotationally broadened to 14 km s−1. Upon visual inspection, some of the CCFs were observed to be asym- metric, and in some cases evidence of a double-peaked 0.0 −100 −50 0 RV (k /s) 50 100 Figure 9. Phase-folded 1D CCF for KIC 6867766 as observed by APOGEE for a subset of the epochs. The CCF is clearly double- peaked, and the two CCF components have maximum separation near phases φ ∼ 0.25 and φ ∼ 0.75: a clear indication that the KOI planet signal is the result of a binary companion. CCF were present. In these situations, the parameters of our best 1D CCF template are generally not reflective of any component in the system: a multi-dimensional cross-correlation analysis is required. To test whether the Kepler transits might be due to the binary showing up in the CCF, we calculate the 1D CCFs for each APOGEE observation, normalize each CCF to a peak value of unity, and then sort them based on the orbital phase corresponding to each observation, phase-folding on the time of transit and orbital period as reported in the KOI catalog. We show only a few of the CCFs sampling different orbital phases in Fig. 9 for clarity. We find that this technique is quite effective at finding time-variable CCF changes indicative of blended SB2s. In the case of KIC 6867766, the double-peaked nature of the CCF is readily apparent, and phase-folds nicely with the KOI orbital solution (maximum separa- tion between CCF components near phases φ ∼ 0.25 and φ ∼ 0.75 after phase-folding on KOI T0, blended compo- nents near φ ∼ 0 and φ ∼ 0.5). Upon further analysis, we determined that this sys- tem includes three stellar mass objects: a late F-type dwarf (KIC6867766A) with an early M-dwarf companion (KIC6867766B) in a ∼ 13 day orbit, and a late G-type dwarf (KIC6867766C) with no discernible velocity mo- tion. We analyzed the APOGEE spectra with the TRI- COR algorithm (Zucker et al. 1995), which uses a 3D cross-correlation to derive the RV of three blended spec- tral components and their relative flux ratios. Our anal- ysis used spectral templates constructed from BT Settl models (Allard et al. 2011), convolved to the APOGEE spectral resolution and sampling. We optimized the tem- plate stellar parameters to best match the observed spec- tra, using the peak correlation power from our highest S/N APOGEE spectra to assess the template match. All three components used templates with solar metallicity and log g = 4.5. The effective temperatures and rota- tional velocities were: A: 6200 K, 10 km s−1; B: 3500 K, APOGEE Spectroscopy of the Kepler Field 9 KIC6867766 A C B q = 0.388± 0.006 100 50 0 −50 −100 4.0 2.0 0.0 −2.0 −4.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 −10.0 −20.0 ) 1 − s m k ( y t i c o e V l i l a d a R A C − A O ) 1 − s m k ( B C − B O ) 1 − s m k ( 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Orbital Phase 0.8 1.0 Figure 10. Three-component RV solution for KIC 6867766 using APOGEE RVs. Components A and B are an F+M EB pair that produces the Kepler transit signal, while Component C is a (likely) bound G dwarf companion with a long orbital period that dilutes the A+B eclipse. 3 km s−1; C: 5200 K, 3 km s−1. We fixed the relative H band flux ratios to be C/A = 0.35 and B/A = 0.05, which are consistent with both the optimal flux ratios de- rived by TRICOR and the physical flux ratios expected for these stars. Table 1 contains the RVs we derived for each of the stellar components, while Table 2 lists the best (least- squares derived) spectroscopic orbital parameters for the 13-day binary. We rejected some or all of the component RVs measured in five of the epochs due to peak pulling between the three components (generally A and C, but occasionally all three), and these are indicated in Ta- ble 1 with ellipses. Most of our APOGEE spectra have median S/N of ∼ 25 − 30 per pixel, but four (2014-04- 11, 2014-04-14, 2014-05-11, 2014-06-18) had S/N . 10. We recovered the M-dwarf signal in each of these low S/N spectra and so retained them in our final orbital solution, albeit with larger RV uncertainties that reflect the poorer data quality. Fig. 10 shows the phase-folded RV curves for the AB binary, and residuals from the de- rived orbital solution. We also plot the measured RVs for KIC6867766C, which are flat and very close to the systemic velocity of the AB binary. This suggests that KIC6867766C is a bound companion to the AB binary in a very long-period orbit. We did not detect significant change in the RV of KIC6867766C, so cannot estimate its orbital period. We conclude that the KIC6867766 is a likely hierarchical triple system, and an exoplanet false positive corresponding to Scenario 2 in Figure 1 (although in this case, the tertiary star is also within the spectrograph's FoV). 3.2. Survey Efficiency Several high-precision RV instruments are available in the northern hemisphere to confirm Kepler exoplanet candidates by achieving RV precisions of a few m s−1, including HARPS-North, Keck HIRES, SOPHIE, and HET HRS. These instruments are clearly capable of con- ducting a reconnaissance survey of Kepler KPCs for false positives, but their telescope time is most effectively spent observing robust exoplanet candidates for con- firmation and characterization purposes. Smaller tele- scopes have been used to measure RVs for hundreds of KOIs through the Kepler CFOP (e.g., McDonald 2.7m, Tillinghast 1.5m), and while they have helped identify the best candidates for higher precision RV follow-up, they are limited to a single target at a time: most KOIs have just one or two observations from these facilities. To compare the efficiency of APOGEE against the larger- aperture telescopes mentioned above, we calculate the integration time per target required to achieve a photon- limited RV precision of 100 m s−1. A quality factor Q is calculated following Bouchy et al. (2001), adapting in- strument parameters summarized in Table 3. The qual- ity factor represents the fundamental RV information content of a spectrum, which depends on the number, depths, and widths of spectral features. The Q values are calculated using BT Settl stellar models for a range of stellar effective temperatures (Teff), adopting a surface gravity log g = 5.0, a solar metallicity, and no rotational broadening. Including a rotational broadening will af- fect higher resolution instruments the most, resulting in lower Q values. From these Q values, it is then possible to calculate the required integration time per object (an "effective integration time") to achieve a given, photon-limited RV precision (here taken to be 100 m s−1), via: (cid:16) c σrv Q √πR2ǫF (cid:17)2 ntargets t = + tover (1) where t is the effective integration time, c is the speed of light, σrv is the desired RV precision, Q is the qual- ity factor, R is the telescope's effective aperture radius, ǫ is the total throughput (as a percentage) of the tele- scope and instrument, F is the flux in photons per second per unit area, tover is the overhead per integration, and ntargets is the number of targets observed per integration. Since we are operating in the photon-limited case, we do not include readout noise for the instruments, nor con- sider sources of systematic uncertainties such as residual moonlight contamination (worse in the optical), or resid- ual telluric lines and sky emission lines (worse in the NIR) -- our interest is in calculating the photon limited case for a direct comparison. The fluxes are calculated from the BT Settl models after convolving with the appropriate filter transmis- sion function: Johnson/Bessell V 5 for HARPS-North, Keck HIRES, SOPHIE, and HET HRS; 2MASS H 6 for APOGEE. The model fluxes are scaled to the zero mag- nitude level using zero-level fluxes from Bessell et al. (1998) in V and Cohen et al. (2003) in 2MASS, which are then further scaled to a desired apparent magnitude. We calculate the effective integration time for each in- strument by including an estimated overhead for detector readout, telescope slew, target acquisition and calibra- tions. Since overhead times between integrations depend 5 http://www.ctio.noao.edu/~points/SOIFILTERS/filters/ maintext.html 6 http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/releases/allsky/doc/ sec3_1b1.html 10 Scott W. Fleming et al. Figure 11. Total time (integration + overhead) required to achieve a photon-limited RV precision of 100 m s−1 on a per target basis, as a function of stellar Teff . Note that at this scale, HARPS- North and Keck HIRES are nearly indistinguishable. APOGEE's multiplexing capability is the driving factor in reducing the time per target here. on a variety of factors, we adopt three minutes as an average overhead time for HARPS-North, Keck HIRES, SOPHIE and HET HRS. For APOGEE, we use a mini- mum integration time of 66.7 minutes and an overhead time of 15 minutes, equivalent to the current survey's integration time per visit for each field and its average overhead time between fields. We do not reduce the in- tegration time for APOGEE below this minimum value because the total integration time is not based on any one target's brightness, but rather an overall integration time required for all targets in a field. We calculate the required integration times t at a spe- cific H (and corresponding V ) magnitude for both the single object and multi-object instruments, to allow for more direct comparisons. We use the median KPC host star flux level of H ∼ 13.5, along with the appropriately scaled V fluxes for the optical instruments. The average number of KPC host stars within each APOGEE field that have H < 13.5 is 89, so we use this as the number of KPC hosts that can be observed simultaneously with APOGEE's multiplexing capability for the purposes of comparing against the single-object instruments. All of these input parameters are summarized in Table 3. Fig. 11 displays the required integration times per tar- get to achieve a photon-limited RV precision of 100 m s−1 for a variety of spectral types. At this RV precision, APOGEE is approximately three times as efficient on a per target basis, primarily due to APOGEE's abil- ity to observe multiple KPC hosts simultaneously, and the fact that at this RV precision, the other instruments are dominated by overheads per target. As the targeted precision level increases, the other instruments become increasingly more efficient compared to APOGEE, re- flective of the fact that they are no longer dominated by overheads. These basic calculations serve to demonstrate how the multiplexing capability of APOGEE enables an efficient survey at modest RV precision compared to the single-object instruments, and that the telescope time for those instruments is best spent on achieving high RV precision to confirm new exoplanets. Fig. 12 plots the orbital period versus H magnitude for Figure 12. Orbital period versus H magnitude for the current KPCs. The dashed, red lines demarcate H = 14 and P = 100 days. Host stars brighter than this H limit and candidates with periods below 100 days represent > 80% of the current KPC catalog, and are particularly well-suited for APOGEE to characterize the orbits of binaries. Our SDSS-III and SDSS-IV KOI programs observe targets over more than one year baselines, however, and can detect stellar companions out to the longest KOI orbital periods. the current KPC catalog. Host stars with H < 14 and P < 100 days are particularly well-suited for APOGEE to characterize any binary star orbits, and represent more than 80% of the current KPCs. Note, however, that even KPCs with longer orbital periods, extending to at least a few hundred days, can be identified as binaries even if the observing baseline does not cover the entire orbital period. If a more conservative limit of H < 13 is applied, more than 47% of the KPCs would be included. Scenario 5 in Fig. 1 relies most heavily on achieving high signal- to-noise ratio observations, and thus has the brightest limiting magnitude within a survey; however, it is also the false positive scenario for which APOGEE is least sensitive. 4. DISCUSSION AND COMPARISON TO PRIOR WORK 4.1. Comparison With Other Efforts A variety of techniques exist to determine whether a given KPC might be a false positive using only Kepler photometric information. Examination of the transits can be done to ensure that the odd/even transits have the same depth, that there are no ellipsoidal variations, and that the positions of the flux centroids do not vary with brightness changes, all of which are signs that the transit event may be due to a diluted EB (Steffen et al. 2010; Torres et al. 2011). Another method is to gen- erate a large grid of synthetic EB blend scenarios and compare the models to the observed lightcurves via a χ2 analysis (e.g., BLENDER, Torres et al. 2011), al- though the technique can be computationally expensive and difficult to apply to all KPCs en masse. In addition, imaging surveys (e.g., Howell et al. 2011; Adams et al. 2012) can be used to inform the photometric analyses de- scribed above, particularly to identify fainter stars that exist within the lightcurve aperture, and to search for wide stellar companions to study any relationships be- tween exoplanet properties and host star multiplicity (Wang et al. 2014). Another technique makes use of stellar population APOGEE Spectroscopy of the Kepler Field 11 synthesis and Galactic models to estimate the prob- ability that a given transit signal is due to an EB. Morton & Johnson (2011) used such a technique to esti- mate the false positive probability (FPP) of KPCs, and concluded that 90% of the KPCs had FPPs < 10%, a result that was used by other authors in subsequent sta- tistical analyses of the KPC planet candidates. However, the technique presented in Morton & Johnson (2011) re- lied on KPCs to be vetted to the fullest extent possible using the Kepler photometry, specifically, the removal of V-shaped transits and searches for faint secondary eclipses, whereas the table of KPCs presented in their paper was not limited to these pre-vetted KPCs. An updated version of the technique by Morton (2012) accounted for more false positive scenarios and clarified the importance of pre-vetting KPCs before performing the statistical analysis. The updated implementation can be run fairly quickly (of order 10 minutes per star), and has been verified by testing it on confirmed KPCs and known false positive KPCs; however, the technique works best with additional observations (imaging to de- tect close, visual companions and at least one high reso- lution spectrum to get coarse stellar parameters). In ad- dition, the Bayesian modeling is dependent on a variety of model assumptions regarding Galactic structure, stel- lar population synthesis, distribution of binary proper- ties, and the frequency of exoplanets for various types of stars. While the framework explicitly accounts for such assumptions through the adopted priors, and is fairly trivial to update when new knowledge is obtained about any of these distributions, direct spectroscopic or photo- metric observations of false positives are the least model- dependent approach to derive the false positive statistics of KPCs. The Kepler CFOP program has been conducting spectroscopic and imaging campaigns to identify blend sources of KOIs, and, as previously mentioned, have col- lected thousands of RV measurements for hundreds of KOIs, in addition to high-resolution imaging to search for faint companions unresolved in the Kepler photometric aperture. Our program selected targets independently of those observed by the CFOP program, since our goal was to minimize selection bias in the KOIs we observe. Our program complements the CFOP in a variety of ways. The CFOP imaging data can identify wide stellar companions, while our RV measurements over 18-month baselines can detect linear RV trends of intermediate- period companions that are unresolved by AO or lucky imaging. The abundances of the ∼15 elements within APOGEE's H band spectral window can be compared and contrasted with elements accessible in the CFOP optical spectra. Many of the CFOP spectroscopic observations have ob- tained just one or two spectra near predicted quadrature phases, where any contaminating spectral lines from a stellar companion are at maximum separation. This is of- ten sufficient to identify a subset of false positive scenar- ios: eclipsing stellar companions orbiting the KIC star, for example. In contrast, each of our KOI targets in SDSS-III/IV (except those few that were part of our Ke- pler EB program) obtain more than twenty APOGEE RVs, which allow us to fully characterize the orbits of any bound companions causing the false positive transit signals. In the case of eclipsing low-mass secondaries, this further enables a study of the fundamental mass- radius relationship for K and M dwarfs, since precise mass ratios at the 1% level are achievable. Our mul- tiple RV measurements can also be used to search for (and place limits on) the presence of any longer-period, non-transiting companions (stellar or otherwise), for the study of multiplicity amongst Kepler planet hosts. Studies have found that the false positive rates for various subsets of KPCs are larger than the ones found from the Morton & Johnson (2011) study, whose quoted statistics are only valid for fully pre-vetted KPCs, and that this rate might differ depending on the orbital pe- riod and transit depth of the KPCs. Col´on et al. (2012) made use of multi-color differential photometry to test for false positives due to diluted EBs whose components have sufficiently different colors. They observed a total of four KPCs that had short periods (P < 6 days) and small radii (Rp < 5 R⊕), and found evidence that two of the four were likely due to diluted EBs, excluding an overall false positive rate of 10% with 99% confidence. Santerne et al. (2012) collected spectroscopic RVs of 33 giant planet KPCs using the SOPHIE spectrograph and found a false positive probability of at least 35% within their sample, where a majority of false positives were due to EBs. Their sample size of 33 KPCs was partly limited by their telescope resource: a single-object spectrograph observing in the optical using a 2m-class telescope, cor- responding to an effective magnitude limit in the Kepler bandpass of Kp . 14.7. This magnitude limit removes almost half of the total KPCs. Utilizing a multi-object, NIR spectrograph, such as APOGEE, increases the rate of data collection while also increasing the total number of KPCs able to be observed. 4.2. Abundances of KOI Host Stars Beyond identifying false positive KPCs as binaries, a variety of additional science projects can be done with the NIR APOGEE spectra. One such example is the study of chemical abundance patterns in planet host stars compared to stars not known to host plan- ets. One of APOGEE's primary goals is to measure the chemical abundances of many elements to study stel- lar populations within the Milky Way. These abun- dances are measured using the APOGEE Stellar Pa- rameters and Chemical Abundances Pipeline (ASPCAP, 2015), which consists of a suite Garc´ıa P´erez et al. of software codes to analyze, in an automated fash- ion, the APOGEE spectra. The main component of the code is FERRE7, a Fortran optimization code that searches for the set of parameters that best match each APOGEE spectrum. FERRE was originally devel- oped in the context of low-resolution SDSS spectroscopy (Allende Prieto 2004; Allende Prieto et al. 2006), and has subsequently evolved and been used in other con- texts (Allende Prieto et al. 2008a, 2009; Brown et al. 2012; Kilic et al. 2012). The APOGEE band (1.5-1.7 µm) is rich in transitions from many elements in cool stars. Abundances for 15 elements can be derived from sufficiently high resolution (R > 20000) and signal-to- noise per pixel (S/N> 100) spectra in this spectral win- dow: C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cr. A S/N level approaching 100 per pixel is expected 7 FERRE is available at http://hebe.as.utexas.edu/ferre 12 Scott W. Fleming et al. versus Neptunian-mass planets is 0.20 dex, which is sig- nificant and indicates that the metallicity populations for stars with Jovian-mass planets are not the same as those which host the smaller Neptunian-mass planets. Oth- ers have used the Kepler sample to extend the planet- metallicity correlation down to terrestrial-sized planets (Buchhave et al. 2012), and have found that terrestrial- sized planets fall into well-defined host-star metallicity regimes (Buchhave et al. 2014). These results suggest that metallicity may also influence the distribution of planetary masses within extrasolar systems. In addi- tion to stellar metallicity, there are also suggestions that stellar mass plays a role, such that the dominant plane- tary mass decreases as the parent star's mass decreases (Ghezzi et al. 2010; Mayor et al. 2011), at least for main sequence stars. While massive subgiant and giant stars show trends similar to main sequence stars, low- mass giants show a different behavior (Maldonado et al. 2013). It is likely that some combination of stellar mass and metallicity influences the type of planetary system that will form (Johnson et al. 2010). APOGEE can provide a statistically significant control sample for such studies. In addition to overall metallicity and stellar mass play- ing a role, the detailed chemistry of the parent cloud in which the system forms may also hold clues to further understanding planet formation. Recent findings sug- gest that specific abundance patterns, such as Mg/Fe, may influence the likelihood that a star hosts an under- lying planetary system (Adibekyan et al. 2012a), and that enhancement in alpha elements may favor the for- mation of rocky planets, even for stars with low iron abundances (Adibekyan et al. 2012b). The C/O ratio in the parent cloud is also found in some studies to be en- riched in planet hosting systems, with C/O ratios > 0.8 (Delgado Mena et al. 2010; Petigura & Marcy 2011), however, these results have been questioned by Fortney (2012), and have not been confirmed by other groups (Nissen 2013; Teske et al. 2014). Brugamyer et al. (2011) find that the silicon abundance (and not the oxygen abundance) is a key element, as they find that their planet detection rate depends strongly on the sil- icon abundance of the host star. A difference in the Si abundance is also found for the XO-2 binary host stars, where XO-2N is found to be enhanced relative to XO-2S (Teske et al. 2015). Mel´endez et al. (2009), Gonz´alez Hern´andez et al. (2010), and Schuler et al. (2011) present intriguing results suggesting that low- amplitude chemical signatures point to selective accre- tion or depletion of refractory and volatile elements in stellar exoplanetary hosts. In particular, trends of abun- dances with condensation temperature (Tcond) are used as diagnostics, and these can be defined from the abun- dances of the 15 chemical elements covered by APOGEE, which include C, N, O (volatiles) and Si, Ti and Al (re- fractories). The investigation of such trends in samples of Kepler stars with confirmed planets of different masses, and including the smallest planets to date, provides an unprecedented database in order to probe the importance of Tcond trends in this context. 5. SUMMARY In this paper, we highlight the importance of an RV survey of KPCs to better determine the false positive Figure 13. Comparison of [M/H] values from ASPCAP DR12 and Buchhave et al. (2014) for stars in common. The ASPCAP values are taken from the '"uncalibrated" (initial fit) values ("FPARAM" array). We find that a majority of these targets fall within 0.1 dex of the Buchhave et al. (2014) values (grey dashed lines). These boundaries also represent the typical 1σ uncertainties for both sets of values. There are not enough targets with "externally cali- brated" values ("PARAM" array) in ASPCAP DR12 to make a statement about how those compare to Buchhave et al. (2014). to be achieved out to H ∼ 14 by coadding the multiple visits. A detailed analysis of elemental abundances for KOIs with and without exoplanets is beyond the scope of this introductory paper. To get some sense of the metal- licites coming from the automated ASPCAP pipeline, we have compared the "uncalibrated" [M/H] values from ASPCAP in DR12 with those found in Buchhave et al. (2014) for stars in common. The "uncalibrated" values are the parameters that come from the initial fit. A subset of targets have additional, external calibrations applied to their stellar parameters (such as metallici- ties of clusters from the literature). We refer the reader to the ASPCAP DR12 documentation8 for full details. There are not enough targets that have had external calibrations applied to make any statement regarding their agreement. However, we find a total of 128 KOI host stars observed in common that have "uncalibrated" [M/H] values in DR12. We find the agreement to be promising (Fig. 13): a majority of targets agree within 0.1 dex (grey lines in Fig. 13), despite the fact that AS- PCAP has been calibrated primarily to work on bright giants. We have not made any cuts based on ASPCAP processing flags; this is a comparison using DR12 [M/H] values "as they are" versus the Buchhave et al. (2014) values. As such, the relation in Fig. 13 should be consid- ered as preliminary, and likely to be improved upon in future analyses. There are tantalizing hints for different heavy ele- ment patterns in planet hosts relative to the field that could be induced by preferential removal of heavy ele- ments in the disk. It's been shown that stars hosting Jovian-mass planets tend to be more metal-rich than stars with only Neptunian-mass planets (Sousa et al. 2008; Ghezzi et al. 2010; Sousa et al. 2011). The over- all shift in values of [Fe/H] between stars with Jovian- 8 http://www.sdss.org/dr12/irspec/parameters/ APOGEE Spectroscopy of the Kepler Field 13 rate, and demonstrate that APOGEE can efficiently con- duct such a survey of KPCs to identify, and in many cases characterize the orbits of, false positive KPCs. We have shown that the APOGEE instrument is capable of achieving an RV precision of ∼ 100 m s−1 using observa- tions of the confirmed exoplanet host star KIC 6448890, as well as the Kepler EB KIC 01571511, which produces planet-sized eclipses and has an H magnitude similar to many KPCs. We find that the transit signal of KIC 3848972 is not caused by a blue, stellar secondary orbit- ing the primary star, and do not find any evidence of a faint, red companion in Keck AO images that could be the source of the Kepler transit events. Further inves- tigation is merited before the true nature of this KOI can be confidently identified. We find HET RV varia- tions that phase to the KOI period and ephemeris for KIC 3861595, but our APOGEE RVs are inconsistent with the HET RV semiamplitude, and we find evidence of line bisector variations. This target was part of our EB program in SDSS, so we only have a few spectra to work with, and the RV uncertainties have not been fully vetted for rapdily rotating stars such as this one. As such, we can not definitively determine the nature of this KPC, and urge more spectra be obtained to exam- ine both the RV and line bisector variations. Finally, we find that KIC 6867766 is a triple system, composed of an F+M EB and a wide, bound G dwarf tertiary. The F+M EB phases to the KOI period and ephemeris, and the diluted eclipses are the source of the KPC transits. As such, we can confidently identify this KOI as a false positive exoplanet candidate. Not only can the data from such a survey be used to de- termine the false positive rate of KPCs and vet the sam- ple to identify the best candidates for high-precision RV observations, but it will enable ancillary science projects in fundamental stellar astrophysics though observations of EBs, studies of intrinsically rare short-period com- panions (such as brown dwarfs), and detailed chemical abundances of exoplanet host stars. At the precision level of 100 m s−1, APOGEE is a more efficient instru- ment compared to HARPS-North, Keck HIRES, and SO- PHIE, due to its multiplexing capability and because the single-object spectrographs are dominated by overheads. Our survey to detect false positives refines the target selection for higher precision RV instruments, enabling them to focus on the best exoplanet candidates. It will allow for improved statistical studies of the Kepler exo- planet population by determining the false positive rate of KPCs due to physically-bound binaries, as well as any trends in the false positive rate with orbital period or stellar properties. We thank the anonymous referee for detailed com- ments that improved the quality of this publication, es- pecially their suggestion to conduct more analysis on the KOI-4 RVs. We acknowledge support from NSF award AST1006676, AST 1126413, and AST 1310885. This work was partially supported by funding from the Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds. The Cen- ter for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds is supported by the Pennsylvania State University, the Eberly Col- lege of Science, and the Pennsylvania Space Grant Con- sortium. CAP acknowledges funding from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) through grant AYA2011-26244. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Stras- bourg, France. This publication makes use of data prod- ucts from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California In- stitute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronau- tics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. Some of the data presented in this paper were obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Tele- scopes (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HST data is provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant NNX13AC07G and by other grants and contracts. This paper includes data collected by the Ke- pler mission. Funding for the Kepler mission is provided by the NASA Science Mission directorate. This research has made use of the NASA Exoplanet Archive, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration under the Exoplanet Exploration Program. This work was based on observations with the SDSS 2.5-meter telescope. Funding for SDSS-III has been pro- vided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participat- ing Institutions, the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. The SDSS-III web site is http://www.sdss3.org/. SDSS- III is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consor- tium for the Participating Institutions of the SDSS- III Collaboration including the University of Arizona, the Brazilian Participation Group, Brookhaven National Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Florida, the French Participa- tion Group, the German Participation Group, Harvard University, the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, the Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group, Johns Hopkins University, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, New Mex- ico State University, New York University, Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the Spanish Partici- pation Group, University of Tokyo, University of Utah, Vanderbilt University, University of Virginia, University of Washington, and Yale University. The parameters used to calculate the background EB blend probability of KIC 3861595 are summarized in Table 4. APPENDIX TRILEGAL INPUT PARAMETERS Adams, E. R., Ciardi, D. R., Dupree, A. K., et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 42 REFERENCES 14 Scott W. Fleming et al. Adibekyan, V. Z., Santos, N. C., Sousa, S. G., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A89 Adibekyan, V. Z., Delgado Mena, E., Sousa, S. G., et al. 2012, arXiv:1209.6272 Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2011, 16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, 448, 91 Allende Prieto, C. 2004, Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, 604 Allende Prieto, C., Beers, T. C., Wilhelm, R., et al. 2006, ApJ, 636, 804 Allende Prieto, C., Sivarani, T., Beers, T. C., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2070 Allende Prieto, C., Majewski, S. R., Schiavon, R., et al. 2008, Astronomische Nachrichten, 329, 1018 Allende Prieto, C., Hubeny, I., & Smith, J. A. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 759 Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2013, ApJS, 204, 24 Bender, C. F., & Simon, M. 2008, ApJ, 689, 416 Bender, C. F., Mahadevan, S., Deshpande, R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 751, L31 Bessell, M. S., Castelli, F., & Plez, B. 1998, A&A, 333, 231 Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 977 Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 728, 117 Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 19 Bouchy, F., Pepe, F., & Queloz, D. 2001, A&A, 374, 733 Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., & Esquerdo, G. A. 2011, AJ, 142, 112 Brown, W. R., Kilic, M., Allende Prieto, C., & Kenyon, S. J. 2012, ApJ, 744, 142 Brugamyer, E., Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Cochran, W. D., & Sneden, C. 2011, ApJ, 738, 97 Buchhave, L. A., Latham, D. W., Johansen, A., et al. 2012, Nature, 486, 375 Buchhave, L. A., Bizzarro, M., Latham, D. W., et al. 2014, Nature, 509, 593 Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Williams, E., et al. 1996, PASP, 108, 500 Caldwell, D. A., Kolodziejczak, J. J., Van Cleve, J. E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L92 Carter, J. A., Fabrycky, D. C., Ragozzine, D., et al. 2011, Science, 331, 562 Chaplin, W. J., Kjeldsen, H., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., et al. 2011, Science, 332, 213 Christiansen, J. L., Jenkins, J. M., Barclay, T. S., et al. 2012, arXiv:1208.0595 Cohen, M., Wheaton, W. A., & Megeath, S. T. 2003, AJ, 126, 1090 Col´on, K. D., Ford, E. B., & Morehead, R. C. 2012, arXiv:1207.2481 Coughlin, J. L., L´opez-Morales, M., Harrison, T. E., Ule, N., & Hoffman, D. I. 2011, AJ, 141, 78 Delgado Mena, E., Israelian, G., Gonz´alez Hern´andez, J. I., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 2349 Dotter, A., Chaboyer, B., Jevremovi´c, D., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 89 Eisenstein, D. J., Weinberg, D. H., Agol, E., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 72 Ford, E. B., Ragozzine, D., Rowe, J. F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 185 Fortney, J. J. 2012, ApJ, 747, L27 Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748 Garc´ıa P´erez, A. E. et al. 2015, in prep Ghezzi, L., Cunha, K., Smith, V. V., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1290 Gilliland, R. L., Chaplin, W. J., Dunham, E. W., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 6 Girardi, L., Barbieri, M., Groenewegen, M. A. T., et al. 2012, Red Giants as Probes of the Structure and Evolution of the Milky Way, 165 Gonz´alez Hern´andez, J. I., Israelian, G., Santos, N. C., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1592 Gunn, J. E., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2332 Hirano, T., Sanchis-Ojeda, R., Takeda, Y., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 66 Holman, M. J., Fabrycky, D. C., Ragozzine, D., et al. 2010, Science, 330, 51 Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2012, ApJS, 201, 15 Howell, S. B., Everett, M. E., Sherry, W., Horch, E., & Ciardi, D. R. 2011, AJ, 142, 19 Huber, D., Carter, J. A., Barbieri, M., et al. 2013, Science, 342, 331 Huber, D., Silva Aguirre, V., Matthews, J. M., et al. 2014, ApJS, 211, 2 Kraus, A. L., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2007, AJ, 134, 2340 Johnson, J. A., Aller, K. M., Howard, A. W., & Crepp, J. R. 2010, PASP, 122, 905 Johnson, J. A., Clanton, C., Howard, A. W., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 26 Kilic, M., Brown, W. R., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 751, 141 Koch, D. G., Borucki, W. J., Basri, G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L79 Lagrange, A.-M., Desort, M., Galland, F., Udry, S., & Mayor, M. 2009, A&A, 495, 335 Mahadevan, S., Deshpande, R., Bender, C., et al. 2015, in prep Majewski, S. R., Wilson, J. C., Hearty, F., Schiavon, R. R., & Skrutskie, M. F. 2010, IAU Symposium, 265, 480 Majewski, S. R., et al. 2015, in prep Maldonado, J., Villaver, E., & Eiroa, C. 2013, A&A, 554, AA84 Marcy, G. W. & Butler, R. P. 2000, PASP, 112, 137 Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., et al. 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20 Mayor, M., Marmier, M., Lovis, C., et al. 2011, arXiv:1109.2497 Mel´endez, J., Asplund, M., Gustafsson, B., & Yong, D. 2009, ApJ, 704, L66 M´esz´aros, S., Allende Prieto, C., Edvardsson, B., et al. 2012, arXiv:1208.1916 Moorhead, A. V., Ford, E. B., Morehead, R. C., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 1 Morton, T. D. 2012, arXiv:1206.1568 Morton, T. D., & Johnson, J. A. 2011, ApJ, 738, 170 Nidever, D. L., Holtzman, J. A., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2015, arXiv:1501.03742 Nissen, P. E. 2013, A&A, 552, AA73 Ofir, A., Gandolfi, D., Buchhave, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 423, L1 Perruchot, S., Kohler, D., Bouchy, F., et al. 2008, Proc. SPIE, 7014, 17 Petigura, E. A., & Marcy, G. W. 2011, ApJ, 735, 41 Prsa, A., Batalha, N., Slawson, R. W., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 83 Rhodes, M.D. & Budding, E. 2014, Ap&SS Sahlmann, J., et al. 2011, A&A, 525, 95 Santerne, A., D´ıaz, R. F., Moutou, C., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, AA76 Santerne, A., Fressin, F., D´ıaz, R. F., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, AA139 Schuler, S. C., Flateau, D., Cunha, K., et al. 2011, ApJ, 732, 55 Slawson, R. W., Prsa, A., Welsh, W. F., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 160 APOGEE Spectroscopy of the Kepler Field 15 Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., Mayor, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 487, 373 Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., Mayor, M., & Udry, S. 2011, A&A, 533, AA141 Steffen, J. H., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 1226 Steffen, J. H., Fabrycky, D. C., Agol, E., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 1077 Szentgyorgyi, A. H., & Fur´esz, G. 2007, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 28, 129 Teske, J. K., Cunha, K., Smith, V. V., Schuler, S. C., & Griffith, C. A. 2014, ApJ, 788, 39 Teske, J. K., Ghezzi, L., Cunha, K., et al. 2015, arXiv:1501.02167 Torres, G., Fressin, F., Batalha, N. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 727, 24 Tull, R. G. 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3355, 387 Twicken, J. D., Clarke, B. D., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2010, Proc. SPIE, 7740, 69 Vogt, S. S., Allen, S. L., Bigelow, B. C., et al. 1994, Proc. SPIE, 2198, 362 Wang, J., Fischer, D. A., Xie, J.-W., & Ciardi, D. R. 2014, ApJ, 791, 111 Wilson, J. C., Hearty, F., Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2010, Proc. SPIE, 7735, 77351C Wilson, J. C., Hearty, F., Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2012, Proc. SPIE, 8446 Wizinowich, P. L., Acton, D. S., Lai, O., et al. 2000, Proc. SPIE, 4007, 2 Wright, J. T., & Howard, A. W. 2009, ApJS, 182, 205 Wright, J. T., Roy, A., Mahadevan, S., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 119 Youdin, A. N. 2011, ApJ, 742, 38 Zamora, O., Garc´ıa-Hern´andez, D. A., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2015, in prep Zasowski, G., Johnson, J. A., Frinchaboy, P. M., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 81 Zucker, S., Torres, G., & Mazeh, T. 1995, ApJ, 452, 863 Zucker, S. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 1291 16 Scott W. Fleming et al. RVs for KIC Stars - All RVs in km s−1 Table 1 KIC ID BJD TDB RVA 1σ RVB 1σ RVC 1σ Instrument 1571511 1571511 1571511 3848972 3848972 3848972 3861595 3861595 3861595 3861595 3861595 3861595 3861595 3861595 3861595 3861595 3861595 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6448890 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 6867766 2455811.61304 2455840.59327 2455851.57845 2455811.61297 2455840.59327 2455851.57848 2455789.84195 2455796.82710 2455797.80608 2455801.80843 2455803.80347 2455813.70317 2455823.72718 2455840.66180 2455849.57900 2455851.64939 2455866.56998 2456368.99828 2456411.92027 2456557.73343 2456559.72336 2456560.72108 2456584.63225 2456585.63076 2456757.89294 2456758.90229 2456760.90571 2456761.87281 2456762.86860 2456763.88112 2456783.83567 2456784.82195 2456785.82543 2456786.79845 2456787.80934 2456788.84307 2456812.74509 2456814.75547 2456815.78552 2456816.76627 2456817.76198 2456818.76458 2456819.76222 2456820.75601 2456557.73337 2456559.72331 2456560.72103 2456584.63222 2456585.63072 2456757.89298 2456758.90233 2456760.90575 2456761.87284 2456762.86864 2456763.88116 2456783.83568 2456784.82197 2456785.82544 2456786.79846 2456787.80935 2456788.84309 2456812.74507 2456814.75546 2456815.78551 2456816.76626 2456817.76197 2456818.76456 2456819.76220 2456820.75599 -24.401 -26.348 -18.927 -19.943 -20.161 -19.641 -23.052 -23.827 -23.204 -23.194 -24.285 -22.543 -23.628 -22.930 -24.600 -21.337 -21.608 -55.391 -55.513 -55.598 -55.644 -55.571 -55.582 -55.644 -55.622 -55.801 -55.586 -55.573 -55.621 -55.581 -55.712 -55.781 -55.702 -55.590 -55.640 -55.679 -55.620 -55.615 -55.607 -55.710 -55.632 -55.609 -55.567 -55.666 · · · 38.598 40.497 28.939 37.993 · · · 1.277 -20.442 -17.315 -10.374 · · · 15.664 · · · -12.960 -21.181 -20.018 -12.259 -20.349 -10.567 · · · 16.157 27.340 37.006 40.742 38.303 0.153 0.115 0.105 0.157 0.153 0.150 0.091 0.075 0.081 0.098 0.103 0.566 0.469 0.541 0.434 0.433 0.461 0.117 0.105 0.103 0.106 0.104 0.104 0.105 0.107 0.142 0.112 0.139 0.111 0.109 0.112 0.133 0.108 0.113 0.107 0.118 0.111 0.114 0.107 0.119 0.109 0.110 0.109 0.108 · · · 0.383 0.365 0.399 0.446 · · · 1.679 0.482 1.389 0.432 · · · 0.590 · · · 0.422 0.542 0.398 1.175 0.501 0.455 · · · 0.886 0.445 0.398 0.422 0.356 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · -60.127 -65.538 -36.948 -64.834 · · · 46.983 88.944 79.738 66.784 28.563 -3.902 37.085 73.438 89.949 92.288 55.283 90.837 70.185 32.014 -7.116 -35.030 -59.225 -65.495 -57.968 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 2.882 6.014 3.811 4.138 · · · 9.919 3.869 11.967 3.542 3.463 3.310 3.697 3.067 5.130 4.554 9.284 6.466 6.978 3.443 4.691 4.168 3.500 3.783 3.165 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 6.928 8.042 7.788 8.956 · · · 8.567 10.516 10.500 9.447 · · · 11.547 · · · 9.843 9.443 9.495 7.295 8.471 9.955 · · · 9.461 11.971 8.936 9.396 8.577 · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · HET · · · HET · · · HET · · · HET · · · HET · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE · · · APOGEE 0.664 APOGEE 0.653 APOGEE 0.780 APOGEE 0.754 APOGEE · · · APOGEE 3.754 APOGEE 0.778 APOGEE 3.354 APOGEE 0.760 APOGEE · · · APOGEE 1.018 APOGEE · · · APOGEE 0.759 APOGEE 0.887 APOGEE 0.656 APOGEE 1.769 APOGEE 0.870 APOGEE 0.891 APOGEE · · · APOGEE 1.656 APOGEE 1.059 APOGEE 0.702 APOGEE 0.780 APOGEE 0.668 APOGEE APOGEE Spectroscopy of the Kepler Field 17 KIC 6867766 A+B Orbital Parameters Table 2 Parameter Value 1σ P (days) Tp e ω (deg) KA (km s−1) KB (km s−1) γ (km s−1) MB /MA 12.964712 2456746.58 0.0553 128.6 30.77 79.4 10.87 0.3877 (fixed at Kepler value) 0.21 0.0054 5.7 0.14 1.2 0.14 0.0060 Instrument Parameters For Q Factor Calculation Table 3 Instrument Resolution HARPS-Northa Keck HIRESb SOPHIEc HETd APOGEEe 115000 55000 75000 30000 22500 λmin (cid:0)A(cid:1) 3830 5000 3820 4076 15100 λmax (cid:0)A(cid:1) 6930 6200 6930 7838 17000 Eff. Aperture Total Throughput Overhead # Targets / Obs. Radius (m) (%) (min) (H ∼ 13.5) 3.58 10.0 1.93 9.2 2.12 8 13 4 3 16 3 3 3 3 15 1 1 1 1 89 a Instrument parameters taken from http://www.tng.iac.es/instruments/harps/. b Instrument specs as reported in Johnson et al. inst/hires/throughput.pdf, minus an additional 30% loss due to absorption from the iodine cell. c Instrument parameters taken from http://www.obs-hp.fr/guide/sophie/sophie-info.html. d Instrument parameters are for the 316g5936 cross-disperser in R = 30000 mode using ThAr as a wavelength calibration. Although most planet work has been done using the R = 60000 mode, this resolution is not required to achieve 100 m s−1 RV precision. Efficiency taken from the HRS exposure time calculator http://het.as.utexas.edu/HET/hetweb/Instruments/ HRS/exp/exp_calc.html, and is calculated at the center of the telescope's observability track. e Instrument parameters taken from Wilson et al. of the 2.5m diameter (Gunn et al. 2006). (2011). Efficiency is taken to be 18% from http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/ (2012). Effective aperture radius includes a 30% loss due to obstruction 18 Scott W. Fleming et al. TRILEGAL Parameters Used In KIC 3861595 Background EB Blend Probability Calculation Table 4 Parameter Value Distance modulus resolution of Galaxy components IMF for single stars Binary fraction Binary mass ratios Extinction model Extinction model hz,dust Extinction model hR,dust Extinction calibration at infinity 1σ extinction dispersion Solar Galactocentric radius R⊙ Solar height above the disk z⊙ Thin disk model Thin disk z0 Thin disk t0 Thin disk α Thin disk hR,d Thin disk radial cutoffs Thin disk Σd (⊙) Thin disk SFR+AMR Thick disk model Thick disk hz,td Thick disk hR,td Thick disk radial cutoffs Thick disk Ωtd (⊙) Thick disk SFR+AMR Halo model Halo rh Halo qh Halo Ωh (⊙) Halo SFR+AMR Bulge model Bulge am Bulge a0 Bulge y/x axial ratio η Bulge z/x axial ratio ξ Bulge Sun-GC-bar angle φ0 Bulge Ωb (GC) Bulge SFR+AMR 0.1 mag Chabrier lognormal 0.3 0.7 to 0.1 Exponential disk of form exp (cid:0)− z /hz,dust(cid:1) ∗ exp (cid:0)−R/hR,dust(cid:1) 110 pc 100000 pc 0.0378 0. 8700 pc 24.2 pc squared hyperbolic secant 94.6902 pc 5.55079E9 yr 1.6666 2913.36 pc 0, 15000 pc 55.4082 M⊙ pc−2 2-step SFR + Fuhrman's AMR + α enhancement with age(yr) = 0.735097t + 0 squared hyperbolic secant 800 pc 2394.07 pc 0, 15000 pc 0.001 M⊙ pc−3 11-12 Gyr const. SFR + Z=0.008 with σ[M/H] = 0.1 dex with age(yr) = t + 0 Oblate r1/4 spheroid 2698.93 pc 0.583063 0.000100397 M⊙ pc−3 12-13 Gyr + Ryan & Norris [M/H] distribution with age (yr) = t + 0 triaxial bulge 2500 pc 95 pc 0.68 0.31 15◦ 406 M⊙ pc−3 10 Gyr, Zoccali et al. 2003 [M/H] + 0.3 dex with age(yr) = t − 2E9
1712.01042	2	1712	2018-02-13T20:54:51	A Neptune-mass Free-floating Planet Candidate Discovered by Microlensing Surveys	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Current microlensing surveys are sensitive to free-floating planets down to Earth-mass objects. All published microlensing events attributed to unbound planets were identified based on their short timescale (below two days), but lacked an angular Einstein radius measurement (and hence lacked a significant constraint on the lens mass). Here, we present the discovery of a Neptune-mass free-floating planet candidate in the ultrashort ($t_{\rm E}=0.320\pm0.003$ days) microlensing event OGLE-2016-BLG-1540. The event exhibited strong finite-source effects, which allowed us to measure its angular Einstein radius of $\theta_{\rm E}=9.2\pm0.5\,\mu$as. There remains, however, a degeneracy between the lens mass and distance. The combination of the source proper motion and source-lens relative proper motion measurements favors a Neptune-mass lens located in the Galactic disk. However, we cannot rule out that the lens is a Saturn-mass object belonging to the bulge population. We exclude stellar companions up to 15 au.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Submitted to ApJ. Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 01/23/15 A NEPTUNE-MASS FREE-FLOATING PLANET CANDIDATE DISCOVERED BY MICROLENSING SURVEYS Przemek Mr´oz1†, Y.-H. Ryu2, J. Skowron1, A. Udalski1, A. Gould2,3,4, M. K. Szyma´nski1, I. Soszy´nski1, R. Poleski3, P. Pietrukowicz1, and S. Koz(cid:32)lowski1, M. Pawlak1, K. Ulaczyk5 (The OGLE Collaboration), and M. D. Albrow6, S.-J. Chung2,7, Y. K. Jung8, C. Han9, K.-H. Hwang2, I.-G. Shin8, J. C. Yee8, W. Zhu10, S.-M. Cha2,11, D.-J. Kim2, H.-W. Kim2, S.-L. Kim2,7, C.-U. Lee2,7, D.-J. Lee2, Y. Lee2,11, B.-G. Park2,7, and R. W. Pogge3 (The KMTNet Collaboration) 1Warsaw University Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warszawa, Poland 2Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejon 34055, Republic of Korea 3Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 4Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, Konigstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany 5Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 6University of Canterbury, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand 7Korea University of Science and Technology, 217 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34113, Republic of Korea 8Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 9Department of Physics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea 10Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3H8, Canada and 11School of Space Research, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Kyeonggi 17104, Republic of Korea Submitted to ApJ. ABSTRACT Current microlensing surveys are sensitive to free-floating planets down to Earth-mass objects. All published microlensing events attributed to unbound planets were identified based on their short timescale (below two days), but lacked an angular Einstein radius measurement (and hence lacked a significant constraint on the lens mass). Here, we present the discovery of a Neptune-mass free-floating planet candidate in the ultrashort (tE = 0.320 ± 0.003 days) microlensing event OGLE-2016-BLG- 1540. The event exhibited strong finite-source effects, which allowed us to measure its angular Einstein radius of θE = 9.2±0.5 µas. There remains, however, a degeneracy between the lens mass and distance. The combination of the source proper motion and source-lens relative proper motion measurements favors a Neptune-mass lens located in the Galactic disk. However, we cannot rule out that the lens is a Saturn-mass object belonging to the bulge population. We exclude stellar companions up to ∼ 15 au. Subject headings: planets and satellites: detection, gravitational lensing: micro 1. INTRODUCTION Gravitational microlensing enables detecting dark ob- jects in a broad mass range: from black holes and neu- tron stars to Earth-sized planets (Paczy´nski 1986). In particular, current microlensing surveys are sensitive to free-floating planets, which are gravitationally unbound to any star. A characteristic timescale of a microlensing event (known as the Einstein time tE) depends on the relative lens-source proper motion µrel and the angular Einstein radius θE: tE = θE µrel = √κM πrel µrel (1) where M is the lens mass, πrel = 1 au (D−1 S ) is the lens-source relative parallax, and κ = 4G/(c2 au) = 8.14 mas/M(cid:12). Here, DL and DS are distances to the lens and source, respectively. L − D−1 The Einstein timescale is the only physical parameter that can be measured for the majority of microlensing events. As the timescale is proportional to the square † Corresponding author: [email protected] root of mass, it is expected that events caused by free- floating planets are very short (tE (cid:46) 2 days). However, the mass measurement requires the knowledge of two ad- ditional physical parameters: the angular Einstein radius θE and the microlens parallax πE = πrel/θE. Although the angular Einstein radius is routinely mea- sured in binary microlensing events via the finite-source effect (Udalski et al. 1994; Mao et al. 1994; Nemiroff & Wickramasinghe 1994), such a measurement is much harder for single lensing events because it requires that the source passes almost exactly over the lens to pro- duce a detectable finite-source signal (Alcock et al. 1997; Yoo et al. 2004). It is expected that finite-source effects should be strong for Earth-mass lenses, because the an- gular size of the source is comparable to the Einstein ring radius (Bennett & Rhie 1996; Ma et al. 2016). To date, however, no such measurements have been reported. The microlens parallax measurements are even harder for free-floating planets. The subtle deviations from the standard microlensing light curve due to parallax can be detected in long-timescale events, as the Earth-based ob- server moves along the orbit (Gould 1992). Parallax can be also measured using simultaneous ground- and space- based observations (Refsdal 1966), for example, with the 2 Mr´oz et al. Spitzer satellite (Dong et al. 2007; Udalski et al. 2015b). However, Spitzer operations require the targets to be up- loaded to the spacecraft at least three days in advance, making observations of short events nearly impossible. The problem can be overcome with continuous, survey- mode observations (e.g., Henderson & Shvartzvald 2016; Gould 2016). Such an experiment was conducted dur- ing the K2 Campaign 9 (Henderson et al. 2016; Penny et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2017), but owing to the difficul- ties in extracting the photometry from crowded regions of the Galactic bulge, no observations of short-timescale microlensing events from K2 C9 were reported so far. Information about the mass function of lenses, includ- ing free-floating planets, can be inferred from a statistical analysis of the distribution of timescales of a large sample of microlensing events. The first such measurement was attempted by Sumi et al. (2011), who analyzed a sample of 474 microlensing events detected by the Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA) group. They found an excess of nine short2 events, relative to what was ex- pected from brown dwarfs and stars, and they attributed this excess to a large population of Jupiter-mass plan- ets, which should be nearly twice as common as main- sequence stars. Clanton & Gaudi (2017) modeled the microlensing sig- nal expected from exoplanets on wide orbits using con- straints from microlensing, radial velocity, and direct imaging surveys and concluded that at most ∼ 40% of short-timescale events detected by Sumi et al. (2011) can be interpreted as due to wide-orbit planets. However, the statistical significance of Sumi et al.'s results is largely based on three shortest-timescale events (tE < 1 days). As we mentioned above, one measurement is incorrect and the model by Clanton & Gaudi (2017) shows that the remaining two are statistically consistent with being wide-orbit planets. That model still cannot account for a small overabundance of events with timescales between 1 -- 2 days (see Figures 4 and 5 from Clanton & Gaudi 2017), but the statistical significance of the remaining ex- cess relative to the short-timescale events expected from stars and brown dwarfs is small. A large population of Jupiter-mass free-floating plan- ets suggested by Sumi et al. (2011) was difficult to recon- cile with censuses of substellar objects in young clusters and star-forming regions and with predictions of planet- formation theories. For example, Pena Ram´ırez et al. (2012) and Scholz et al. (2012) analyzed substellar mass functions of the young clusters σ Orionis and NGC 1333, finding that free-floating planetary-mass objects are at least an order of magnitude less common than main- sequence stars. These observations are incomplete for masses below ∼ 6 MJup, so direct comparisons with mi- crolensing surveys are difficult. Several mechanisms of free-floating planet production have been proposed (e.g., Veras & Raymond 2012), but none of them is capable of explaining the large number of Jupiter-mass free-floaters suggested by Sumi et al. On the other hand, Earth- and super-Earth-mass planets can be scattered and ejected much more efficiently (Pfyffer et al. 2015; Ma et al. 2016; Barclay et al. 2017). 2 They reported ten events with timescales shorter than 2 days, is incorrect (Mr´oz et al. but one measurement, for MOA-ip-1, 2017). The recent analysis of data from the Optical Grav- itational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) (Udalski et al. 2015a) provides much stronger constraints on the abun- dance of free-floating Jupiters. Mr´oz et al. (2017) ana- lyzed a larger sample of over 2,600 microlensing events discovered during the years 2010 -- 2015. They found that Jupiter-mass lenses are at most an order of magnitude less common than suggested by Sumi et al. (with a 95% upper limit of 0.25 Jupiter-mass planets per main- sequence star). They detected, however, a handful of ultrashort-timescale microlensing events (with timescales of less than 0.5 day), strongly suggesting the existence of Earth-mass and super-Earth-mass free-floating planets. Their light curves are not well covered with observations from a single telescope, rendering the detection of the finite-source effect difficult. We conducted a pilot program of searching for ul- trashort microlensing events in the 2016 observing sea- son data. We supplemented OGLE observations with data from the KMTNet survey, a network of longitude- separated telescopes, which provided us with a better coverage of short-timescale microlensing events. Here, we present the discovery of an ultrashort- timescale event OGLE-2016-BLG-1540 and report the first measurement of the Einstein ring radius of a free- floating planet candidate. 2. OBSERVATIONS Microlensing event OGLE-2016-BLG-1540 was discov- ered by the OGLE Early Warning System (Udalski 2003) on 2016 August 6, at equatorial coordinates of R.A. = 18h00m47.s00 and Decl. = −28◦21(cid:48)35.(cid:48)(cid:48)2 (J2000.0), i.e., Galactic coordinates l = 2.186◦, b = −2.574◦. The sur- vey uses a 1.3 m Warsaw Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile (the Observatory is operated by the Carnegie Institution for Science), equipped with a 1.4 deg2 mosaic CCD camera. The event was located in field BLG512, which was observed with a cadence of 20 minutes. The Korea Microlensing Telescope Network (KMTNet) consists of three 1.6 m telescopes equipped with 4.0 deg2 cameras. The telescopes are located in CTIO (Chile), SAAO (South Africa), and SSO (Australia), see Kim et al. (2016) for details. The event was located in two overlapping fields BLG03 and BLG43, monitored with a cadence of 14 minutes. We omitted KMT SSO observa- tions, because they did not cover the peak and did not contribute to constraining the model. We also excluded KMT SAAO data taken before August 3 or after August 16, because the baseline light curve showed systematic variability connected with passages of the Moon near the bulge fields. All observations used in the modeling were taken in the I band. Photometry was extracted using custom implementations of the difference image analysis (Alard & Lupton 1998): Wo´zniak (2000) (OGLE) and Albrow et al. (2009) (KMTNet). The photometric uncertainties were corrected using the standard procedures (Skowron et al. 2016). We additionally reduced KMT CTIO V - and I-band images using DoPhot (Schechter et al. 1993), which allowed us to determine the source color. 3. LIGHT CURVE MODELING A Neptune-mass Free-floating Planet Candidate Discovered by Microlensing Surveys 3 Fig. 1. -- Microlensing event OGLE-2016-BLG-1540 exhibits prominent finite-source effect, because the source is larger than the angular Einstein ring. The light curve can be accurately described using the finite-source point-lens model (black solid line in the I-band, gray dashed line in the V -band). I- and V -band models differ because of different limb-darkening profiles of the source star in two filters. V -band data were not used in the modeling. All measurements were transformed to the OGLE magnitude scale. The light curve of the event (Figure 1) can be accu- rately described using the finite-source point-lens model. The model has four parameters: the time and projected separation of closest approach of the source to the lens t0 and u0, the Einstein timescale tE, and the normalized angular radius of the source ρ = θ∗/θE (θ∗ is the angular radius of the source). Two parameters, Fs and Fb, describe the source and (unmagnified) blend fluxes, respectively. When we al- lowed Fb to vary, we found that in the best-fit solution the blend flux is negative (with the absolute value corre- sponding to a 16 -- 17-mag star). Although such solutions are mathematically possible, this negative blending is too big to be due to normal fluctuations in the background. The best-fit solution is only ∆χ2 = 5 better than the solution with fixed Fb = 0, which can easily be due to statistical noise, or possibly low-level systematics in the data. Given the absence of evidence for blending and the low prior probability for ambient superposed bright source, our best estimate for the blended light is zero, i.e., Fb = 0. The only way that the source flux enters the characterization of the lens is via θ∗ (see Section 4.1). To account for this, while we fix Fb = 0 in the fits, we also add in quadrature 0.05 mag to the uncertainty in centroiding the clump, when we compute our errors of these quantities. S(ϕ)/ ¯S = 1− Γ(1− 3 Two additional (wavelength-dependent) parameters Γ and Λ may be used to describe the limb-darkening profile: 4√cos ϕ), where ϕ is the angle between the normal to the stellar surface and the line of sight (Yoo et al. 2004). The two-parameter limb darkening law provides a more accurate description of a brightness profile than a simple linear law (e.g., Al- brow et al. 1999; Fields et al. 2003; Abe et al. 2003). We 2 cos ϕ)− Λ(1− 5 TABLE 1 Best-fitting model parameters Parameter t0 (HJD(cid:48)) tE (days) u0 ρ Is fs χ2/d.o.f. Value Uncertainty 7606.726 0.320 0.53 1.65 14.76 1.00 0.002 0.003 0.04 0.01 0.05 (fixed) 2160.1/2153 Note: HJD(cid:48)=HJD-2450000. fs = Fs/(Fs + Fb) is the blending parameter. used a fixed ΓI = 0.36 and ΛI = 0.34 which correspond to the physical parameters of the source star (c.f., Sec- tion 4.1). When we allowed Γ and Λ to vary, we found Γ = 0.25±0.20 and Λ = 0.36±0.40, consistent at 1.5−2σ level with the adopted values. The finite-source magnifications were calculated by the direct integration of formulae derived by Lee et al. (2009), which remain valid in the low-magnification regime. The uncertainties were estimated using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. The best-fitting parameters and their 1σ error bars are shown in Table 1. We also considered models with terrestrial parallax (Gould et al. 2009; Freeman et al. 2015). The microlens parallax in the best-fitting solution was πE = 3200± 700, but the χ2 improvement was modest (∆χ2 = 18). The parallax signal came mostly from one observatory (KMT CTIO) from one night and the OGLE data from that night did not provide strong evidence for parallax. Thus, the terrestrial parallax signal may be mimicked by some low-level systematics in the data and cannot be trusted. 14.214.314.414.514.614.714.8MagnitudeOGLEIKMTCTIOIKMTCTIOVKMTSAAOI76037604760576067607760876097610HJD-2450000−0.04−0.020.000.020.04Residual4 Mr´oz et al. 4. PHYSICAL PARAMETERS 4.1. Source star The event was observed in the V -band by the KMT CTIO on the peak night (Figure 1), which al- lowed us to measure the color of the source and hence the Einstein ring radius θE (Yoo et al. 2004). Because the finite-source effect is prominent and the event may no longer be achromatic, we have not used the model- independent regression to estimate the source color. In- stead, we calculated the color for each link of the MCMC chain. The procedure of model fitting, calculating the source color and the limb-darkening coefficients was iter- ated, until the color measurement converged. We com- pared the location of the source and red clump centroid in the instrumental color -- magnitude diagram (CMD) in × 2(cid:48) region around the event for KMT CTIO. We a 2(cid:48) found that the source is ∆(V − I) = 0.61 ± 0.02 redder and ∆I = −0.85 ± 0.09 brighter than the red clump. Assuming the intrinsic color of (V − I)RC,0 = 1.06 of red clump stars (Bensby et al. 2011) and their mean de- reddened brightness in this direction of IRC,0 = 14.36 (Nataf et al. 2013), we calculated the intrinsic brightness IS,0 = 13.51 ± 0.09 and color (V − I)S,0 = 1.67 ± 0.02 of the source. The OGLE-IV CMD, for a larger region of × 4(cid:48), is shown in Figure 2. 4(cid:48) We then found (V − K)S,0 = 3.67 ± 0.03 from color -- color relations from Bessell & Brett (1988) and estimated the angular radius of the source star θ∗ = 15.1 ± 0.8 µas from color-surface brightness relation for giants (Kervella et al. 2004). The latter estimate allowed us to measure the angular Einstein radius θE = θ∗/ρ = 9.2 ± 0.5 µas and the relative lens-source proper motion µrel = θE/tE = 10.5 ± 0.6 mas yr−1. We can also estimate the effective temperature of the source of Teff = 3900±200 K using the color -- temperature relations of Houdashelt et al. (2000) and Ram´ırez & Mel´endez (2005). The corresponding limb-darkening co- efficients (Claret & Bloemen 2011) are: ΓI =0.36 ΛI =0.34 ΓV =0.94 ΛV =−0.21 We used ATLAS models and assumed a solar metallic- ity, microturbulent velocity of 2 km/s and surface grav- ity of log g = 2.0. Limb-darkening coefficients (c, d) from Claret & Bloemen (2011) were transformed to (Γ, Λ) us- ing formulae derived by Fields et al. (2003). 4.2. Source proper motion As the source star is relatively bright and the contri- bution of the lens to the total light is negligible, it is possible to measure the absolute proper motion of the source. We chose a subset of 363 best-seeing (0.7 − 1(cid:48)(cid:48)) and low-background images (out of 11,276 total epochs of this field) spanning 2010 -- 2017 taken with the 24th CCD detector of the OGLE-IV camera. We used the CMD to identify 3818 candidate red clump stars, which served as anchors for the coordinates transformations between the CCD frames. This allowed us to measure proper motions with respect to the mean motion of the Galactic bulge. Fig. 2. -- The OGLE-IV color -- magnitude diagram for stars in a 4(cid:48) × 4(cid:48) region around OGLE-2016-BLG-1540. The source (blue square) is located in a relatively lowly populated region of the diagram. Blue and red areas mark stars used for the proper motion measurements (see Section 4.2). We used the DoPhot PSF photometry package (Schechter et al. 1993) to measure positions of all stars in all 363 images. Then, we calculated the third-order poly- nomial coordinate transformations between each frame and the first frame by minimizing the scatter for the anchor red clump stars. The proper motions were fit- ted with the least-squares method (with outlier rejec- tion). The formal uncertainties of the fit were typi- cally 0.2 − 0.3 mas yr−1. However, the comparison with proper motion measurements based on the OGLE-III data (2001 -- 2009) showed discrepancies larger than the pure statistical error. We decided to employ 0.5 and 0.7 mas yr−1 for N and E directions as our measure of uncertainty; hence, the proper motion of the source is µS = (µN, µE) = (−5.6 ± 0.5,−3.0 ± 0.7) mas yr−1 with respect to the Galactic bulge (see Figure 3). As both the position of the source star on the CMD is uncommon (the star is located below the red giant branch and redwards of red clump giants) and its proper motion is counter to the Galactic rotation, we consider whether this evidence indicates that the source belongs to the far disk population. First, we investigated the CMD position of the source. We identified about 45 stars with similar CMD positions3 and measured their kinematics (their proper motions are marked with gray crosses in Figure 3), finding that these are consistent with all other red giant (i.e., bulge) stars in the field4. Thus, the unusual 3 The analyzed region is marked with a blue rectangle in Figure 2. 4 We compared both distributions of proper motions using the two-sample Anderson -- Darling test and found p-values of 0.21 (for µl component) and 0.65 (µb). Similarly, the two-sample Kolmogorov -- Smirnov test yields p-values of 0.29 and 0.34, respec- tively. Therefore, there is no evidence that these distributions are different. 0.51.01.52.02.53.03.5V−I(OGLE-IV)121314151617181920I(OGLE-IV)redclumpsourceA Neptune-mass Free-floating Planet Candidate Discovered by Microlensing Surveys 5 tion is slightly weaker for larger mass ratios (because the host event is shorter). For q = 10−3, corresponding to the 0.5 M(cid:12) host in the bulge (πrel = 0.01 mas), we found s > 4.8. We note that the presence of a putative host may also be revealed by perturbations to the point-lens light curve due to the planetary caustic caused by the central star (Han & Kang 2003; Han et al. 2005). The angular size of the planetary caustic (relative to the Einstein radius of the planet) is 4/s2 ≤ 0.16 for s ≥ 5. Because the source star is ∼ 10 times larger, the signatures of the caustic are washed out by the finite-source effect. 5. DISCUSSION Current microlensing surveys are capable of detecting free-floating planets down to Earth-mass objects. To this day, however, all reported free-floating planet candi- dates were based on the very short timescale of an event (tE (cid:46) 2 days) and lacked direct measurements of the an- gular Einstein ring size (Sumi et al. 2011; Mr´oz et al. 2017). OGLE-2016-BLG-1540 is the first case for which we procured such a measurement, owing to the fortu- itous fact that the source was a giant. If the source were a dwarf (with at least ten times smaller angular radius), as in the case of ultrashort candidate events detected by Mr´oz et al. (2017), the finite-source effect would be signif- icantly weaker. We simulated the OGLE light curve and found that the finite-source model would be preferred only by ∆χ2 = 1.6 over the point-lens model. The short timescale of the event can be explained in part by the unusual kinematics of the system (see Fig- ure 3). The source is moving at µS = 6.4 mas yr−1 in the direction opposite to the Galactic rotation and the relative lens-source proper motion is large (µrel = 10.5 ± 0.6 mas yr−1). One possible explanation is that the source is located behind the Galactic center in the far disk, in which case we expect the proper motion direc- tion to be opposite compared to closer stars. To test the "far disk" hypothesis, we have studied proper motions of stars located near the source in the CMD (Section 4.2). These stars follow exactly the same distribution of proper motions as the bulge stars. It appears that, although the source proper motion has an unusual direction, the source belongs to the bulge population. The large lens-source proper motion indicates that the lens is moving in the opposite direction than the source (along the Galactic rotation) at µL (cid:38) 5 mas yr−1 relative to red clump stars. The gray dashed circle in Figure 3 marks the relative proper motion of µrel = 10.5 mas yr−1 with respect to the source. As the lens should be lo- cated on this circle, it likely belongs to the Galactic disk population. Only 15% of bulge stars (58% of the disk stars) are located outside the dashed circle in Figure 3, i.e., their proper motions with respect to the source star are higher than µrel. Because the distance to the lens, and so the relative parallax πrel, is unknown, we cannot uniquely measure the lens mass (eq. (1)): M = θ2 E κπrel = 35 M⊕ 0.1 mas πrel If the lens is located in the disk (πrel ≈ 0.1 mas), it should be a Neptune-mass planet. However, we cannot Fig. 3. -- Proper motions of stars in the OGLE-2016-BLG-1540 field (9(cid:48)×18(cid:48)). Orange contours mark proper motions of red clump stars (bulge population), black contours mark main-sequence stars (which represent the Galactic disk population). The dashed red line shows the direction of increasing Galactic longitude and the proper motion of the source star is marked with a blue dot. The gray dashed circle corresponds to the relative proper motion of 10.5 mas yr−1 with respect to the source. As the lens should be located on this circle, it likely belongs to the Galactic disk population. Gray crosses mark stars located near the source in the CMD; they follow the bulge distribution. position of the source star on the CMD cannot be taken as evidence for belonging to some other population. 4.3. Constraints on the host star Additional features in the event light curve would have been detected if the trajectory of the source were for- tunate enough to pass near a putative host star. Be- cause the light curve does not exhibit any signatures of the host star, we can only provide a lower limit on the planet-host separation, using a variation of the method proposed by Gaudi & Sackett (2000). We simulated ar- tificial OGLE light curves (spanning from 2010 March 4, through 2017 October 10) for a given binary model, defined by three additional parameters as compared to the single-lens case: mass ratio q, star-planet separation s (expressed in Einstein radii), and angle α between the source trajectory and binary axis. (The remaining pa- rameters were calculated based on the best-fitting single- lens model from Table 1). We fitted binary and single lensing models to the artificial data and calculated the difference ∆χ2 = χ2 single− χ2 which corresponds to the Einstein radius of the host of θE,host = θE/√q = 0.65 mas. If the lens is located in the Galactic disk (πrel = 0.1 mas), the corresponding host mass is Mhost = 0.5 M(cid:12). For each value of s, we simulated 180 light curves with uniformly distributed α ∈ [0, 2π], and calculated the probability of detecting the host star as the fraction of light curves which fulfill ∆χ2 > ∆χ2 thresh = 225. This probability drops below 90% when s > 5.1. The lower limit on the host separa- binary. We used q = 2× 10−4, 1050510µE[masyr−1]1050510µN[masyr−1]Red clump stars (3722)Main Sequence stars (1251)source6 Mr´oz et al. rule out that the lens belongs to the bulge population (πrel ≈ 0.02 mas), in which case it should be a Saturn- mass object. The geometry required for the lens to be a brown dwarf (πrel (cid:46) 10−3 mas; i.e., DS − DL (cid:46) 60 pc) would require significant fine-tuning. We note that the event occurred inside the K2 C9 superstamp (Henderson et al. 2016), but unfortunately the parallax measurement was impossible, because the K2 C9 campaign finished a few weeks before the event. Microlensing alone cannot distinguish between wide- orbit and unbound planets and, in principle, the lens may be located at a wide orbit, like Uranus or Neptune. Our lower limit for the planet-host separation is 5.1 Ein- stein radii, which corresponds to the projected physical separation of 15 au at πrel = 0.1 mas. Owing to the rel- atively large lens-source proper motion, any stellar com- panions to the lens can be detected in the future, when the lens and source separate. However, the brightness of the source will make detection of the putative host light difficult. The characterization of this event would have been im- possible without nearly continuous observations from the OGLE and KMTNet surveys. This event also shows the importance of securing the color information for short- timescale events and anomalies (see discussion in Hwang et al. 2017). Although we could not have measured the precise mass of the lens, such measurements will be pos- sible in the future with the Euclid (Penny et al. 2013) and WFIRST (Spergel et al. 2015) satellites, but will require simultaneous ground- and space-based observa- tions (Gould & Yee 2013; Yee 2013; Zhu & Gould 2016). Current ground-based experiments are already sensitive to ultrashort microlensing events, but a bigger sample is needed to fully understand their origin. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the anonymous referee for constructive com- ments. The OGLE project has received funding from the National Science Center, Poland, grant MAESTRO 2014/14/A/ST9/00121 to A.U. Work by W.Z., Y.K.J., and A.G. were supported by AST-1516842 from the US NSF. W.Z., I.G.S., and A.G. were supported by JPL grant 1500811. This research has made use of the KMT- Net system operated by the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KASI) and the data were obtained at three host sites of CTIO in Chile, SAAO in South Africa, and SSO in Australia. Work by K.H.H. was support by KASI grant 2017-1-830-03. Work by C.H. was supported by the grant (2017R1A4A101517) of National Research Foundation of Korea. REFERENCES Abe, F., Bennett, D. P., Bond, I. A., et al. 2003, A&A, 411, L493 Alard, C., & Lupton, R. H. 1998, ApJ, 503, 325 Albrow, M. D., Beaulieu, J.-P., Caldwell, J. A. R., et al. 1999, ApJ, 522, 1011 Albrow, M. D., Horne, K., Bramich, D. M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 2099 Alcock, C., Allen, W. H., Allsman, R. A., et al. 1997, ApJ, 491, 436 Barclay, T., Quintana, E. V., Raymond, S. N., & Penny, M. T. 2017, ApJ, 841, 86 Bennett, D. P., & Rhie, S. H. 1996, ApJ, 472, 660 Bensby, T., Ad´en, D., Mel´endez, J., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A134 Bessell, M. S., & Brett, J. M. 1988, PASP, 100, 1134 Clanton, C., & Gaudi, B. S. 2017, ApJ, 834, 46 Claret, A., & Bloemen, S. 2011, A&A, 529, A75 Dong, S., Udalski, A., Gould, A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 664, 862 Fields, D. L., Albrow, M. D., An, J., et al. 2003, ApJ, 596, 1305 Freeman, M., Philpott, L. C., Abe, F., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 181 Gaudi, B. S., & Sackett, P. D. 2000, ApJ, 528, 56 Gould, A. 1992, ApJ, 392, 442 -- . 2016, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 49, 123 Gould, A., & Yee, J. C. 2013, ApJ, 764, 107 Gould, A., Udalski, A., Monard, B., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, L147 Han, C., Gaudi, B. S., An, J. H., & Gould, A. 2005, ApJ, 618, 962 Han, C., & Kang, Y. W. 2003, ApJ, 596, 1320 Henderson, C. B., & Shvartzvald, Y. 2016, AJ, 152, 96 Henderson, C. B., Poleski, R., Penny, M., et al. 2016, PASP, 128, 124401 Houdashelt, M. L., Bell, R. A., & Sweigart, A. V. 2000, AJ, 119, 1448 Hwang, K.-H., Udalski, A., Bond, I. A., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1711.09651 Kervella, P., Bersier, D., Mourard, D., et al. 2004, A&A, 428, 587 Kim, S.-L., Lee, C.-U., Park, B.-G., et al. 2016, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 49, 37 Lee, C.-H., Riffeser, A., Seitz, S., & Bender, R. 2009, ApJ, 695, 200 Ma, S., Mao, S., Ida, S., Zhu, W., & Lin, D. N. C. 2016, MNRAS, 461, L107 Mao, S., Di Stefano, R., Alcock, C., et al. 1994, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 26, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 1336 Mr´oz, P., Udalski, A., Skowron, J., et al. 2017, Nature, 548, 183 Nataf, D. M., Gould, A., Fouqu´e, P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 88 Nemiroff, R. J., & Wickramasinghe, W. A. D. T. 1994, ApJ, 424, L21 Paczy´nski, B. 1986, ApJ, 304, 1 Pena Ram´ırez, K., B´ejar, V. J. S., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Petr-Gotzens, M. G., & Mart´ın, E. L. 2012, ApJ, 754, 30 Penny, M. T., Rattenbury, N. J., Gaudi, B. S., & Kerins, E. 2017, AJ, 153, 161 Penny, M. T., Kerins, E., Rattenbury, N., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2 Pfyffer, S., Alibert, Y., Benz, W., & Swoboda, D. 2015, A&A, 579, A37 Ram´ırez, I., & Mel´endez, J. 2005, ApJ, 626, 465 Refsdal, S. 1966, MNRAS, 134, 315 Schechter, P. L., Mateo, M., & Saha, A. 1993, PASP, 105, 1342 Scholz, A., Jayawardhana, R., Muzic, K., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 24 Skowron, J., Udalski, A., Koz(cid:32)lowski, S., et al. 2016, Acta Astron., 66, 1 Spergel, D., Gehrels, N., Baltay, C., et al. 2015, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1503.03757 Sumi, T., Kamiya, K., Bennett, D. P., et al. 2011, Nature, 473, 349 Udalski, A. 2003, Acta Astron., 53, 291 Udalski, A., Szymanski, M., Mao, S., et al. 1994, ApJ, 436, L103 Udalski, A., Szyma´nski, M. K., & Szyma´nski, G. 2015a, Acta Astron., 65, 1 Udalski, A., Yee, J. C., Gould, A., et al. 2015b, ApJ, 799, 237 Veras, D., & Raymond, S. N. 2012, MNRAS, 421, L117 Wo´zniak, P. R. 2000, Acta Astron., 50, 421 Yee, J. C. 2013, ApJ, 770, L31 Yoo, J., DePoy, D. L., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2004, ApJ, 603, 139 Zhu, W., & Gould, A. 2016, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 49, 93 Zhu, W., Huang, C. X., Udalski, A., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 104501
1004.1662	2	1004	2010-04-13T22:51:20	Axisymmetric modes in vertically stratified self-gravitating discs	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.GA", "astro-ph.SR" ]	We perform linear analysis of axisymmetric vertical normal modes in stratified compressible self-gravitating polytropic discs in the shearing box approximation. We study specific dynamics for subadiabatic, adiabatic and superadiabatic vertical stratifications. In the absence of self-gravity, four well-known principal modes can be identified in a stratified disc: acoustic p-, surface gravity f-, buoyancy g- and inertial r-modes. After characterizing modes in the non-self-gravitating case, we include self-gravity and investigate how it modifies the properties of these modes. We find that self-gravity, to a certain degree, reduces their frequencies and changes the structure of the dispersion curves and eigenfunctions at radial wavelengths comparable to the disc height. Its influence on the basic branch of the r-mode, in the case of subadiabatic and adiabatic stratifications, and on the basic branch of the g-mode, in the case of superadiabatic stratification (which in addition exhibits convective instability), does appear to be strongest. Reducing the three-dimensional Toomre's parameter Q_{3D} results in the latter modes becoming unstable due to self-gravity, so that they determine the onset criterion and nature of gravitational instability of a stratified disc. By contrast, the p-, f- and convectively stable g-modes, although their corresponding \omega^2 are reduced by self-gravity, never become unstable however small the value of Q_{3D}. This is a consequence of the three-dimensionality of the disc. The eigenfunctions corresponding to the gravitationally unstable modes are intrinsically 3D. We also contrast the more exact instability criterion based on our 3D model with that of density waves in 2D (razor-thin) discs. Based on these findings, we comment on the origin of surface distortions seen in numerical simulations of self-gravitating discs.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 -- ?? (2010) Printed 29 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Axisymmetric modes in vertically stratified self-gravitating discs G. R. Mamatsashvili1,2⋆ and W. K. M. Rice 1 1 SUPA, Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, Scotland 2 Georgian National Astrophysical Observatory, Ilia State University, 2a Kazbegi Ave., Tbilisi 0160, Georgia Accepted 2010 April 09. Received 2010 April 08; in original form 2010 February 09 ABSTRACT We carry out a linear analysis of the vertical normal modes of axisymmetric pertur- bations in stratified, compressible, self-gravitating gaseous discs in the shearing box approximation. An unperturbed disc has a polytropic vertical structure that allows us to study specific dynamics for subadiabatic, adiabatic and superadiabatic vertical stratifications, by simply varying the polytropic index. In the absence of self-gravity, four well-known principal modes can be identified in a stratified disc: acoustic p-modes, surface gravity f-modes, buoyancy g-modes and inertial r-modes. After classifying and characterizing modes in the non-self-gravitating case, we include self-gravity in the perturbation equations and in the equilibrium and investigate how it modifies the properties of these four modes. We find that self-gravity, to a certain degree, reduces their frequencies and changes the structure of the dispersion curves and eigenfunc- tions at radial wavelengths comparable to the disc height. Its influence on the basic branch of the r-mode, in the case of subadiabatic and adiabatic stratifications, and on the basic branch of the g-mode, in the case of superadiabatic stratification (which in addition exhibits convective instability), does appear to be strongest. Reducing the three-dimensional Toomre's parameter Q3D results in the latter modes becoming un- stable due to self-gravity, so that they determine the onset criterion and nature of the gravitational instability of a vertically stratified disc. By contrast, the p-, f- and con- vectively stable g-modes, although their corresponding ω2 are reduced by self-gravity, never become unstable however small the value of Q3D. This is a consequence of the three-dimensionality of the disc. The eigenfunctions corresponding to the gravitation- ally unstable modes are intrinsically three-dimensional. We also contrast the more exact instability criterion based on our three-dimensional model with that of density waves in two-dimensional (razor-thin) discs. Based on these findings, we comment on the origin of surface distortions seen in numerical simulations of self-gravitating discs. Key words: accretion, accretion discs -- gravitation -- hydrodynamics -- instabilities -- convection -- (stars:)planetary systems: protoplanetary discs -- turbulence 0 1 0 2 r p A 3 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 2 6 6 1 . 4 0 0 1 : v i X r a 1 INTRODUCTION Self-gravity plays an important role in a variety of as- trophysical systems. It is a main agent determining the dynamical evolution of star clusters, galaxies, various types of accretion discs, etc. Particularly in protoplanetary discs, that are the central subject of our study, self-gravity provides one of the main source of outward angular mo- mentum transport through the excitation of density waves (Papaloizou & Savonije 1991; Laughlin & Bodenheimer 1994; Lodato & Rice 2004, 2005) and is able to cause frag- mentation of a disc into bound clumps, or planets, under ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] certain conditions (Gammie 2001; Rice et al. 2003, 2005; Boss 2004; Mayer et al. 2007; Rafikov 2007). Starting with the seminal paper by Toomre (1964), there have been a large number of studies of the stability of self-gravitating gaseous discs, both in the linear (e.g., Goldreich & Lynden-Bell 1965a,b; Goldreich & Tremaine 1978; Adams et al. 1989; Bertin et al. 1989; Papaloizou & Lin 1989; Laughlin et al. rele- 1997) and non-linear radiation vant physical factors transport) with up-to-date numerical (e.g., Papaloizou & Savonije Laughlin & Bodenheimer 1994; Boss 1998; Pickett et al. 2000, 2003; Gammie 2001; Boss 2003; Johnson & Gammie 2003; Rice et al. 2003, 2005; (e.g., heating, cooling, techniques regimes, including other 1991; 2 G. R. Mamatsashvili and W. K. M. Rice Boss 2004; Mej´ıa et al. 2005; Boley et al. 2006; Mayer et al. 2007; Stamatellos & Whitworth 2009). Linear stability analysis in a vast majority of cases is restricted, for simplicity, to razor-thin, or two-dimensional (2D) discs that are obtained by vertically averaging all quan- tities. In other words, perturbations are assumed to have large horizontal scales compared with the disc thickness. In this limit, the well-known Toomre's parameter Q2D = csΩ πGΣ controls the stability of self-gravitating discs (Toomre 1964). In this case, a density wave, which is the only mode in a 2D disc, is influenced by self-gravity and thus can be- come unstable, as the local dispersion relation for the latter clearly demonstrates (Goldreich & Tremaine 1978; Binney & Tremaine 1987; Bertin et al. 1989). Stability analysis in a more realistic case of self- gravitating three-dimensional (3D) discs is more compli- cated. The disc is vertically stratified due to both its own self-gravity and the vertical component of the gravity of a central object. Depending on the nature of the stratification, there exists a whole new set of various vertical modes in the system (see below), some of which can become unstable due to self-gravity on horizontal length scales comparable to the disc thickness. In this situation, the vertical variation of per- turbations is important and for a correct characterization of the gravitational instability it is necessary to introduce an- other parameter not involving height-dependent variables, such as the sound speed in Toomre's parameter. Further- more, not all types of stratification permit two-dimensional modes, that is, modes with no vertical motions commonly occurring in the 2D treatment. For example, in non-self- gravitating discs with polytropic vertical structure, there are no 2D modes (Lin et al. 1990; Lubow & Pringle 1993b; Korycansky & Pringle 1995) implying that the dynamics does not always reduce to that of the 2D case. Therefore, a more accurate stability analysis of self-gravitating discs should necessarily be three-dimensional. Obviously, before studying the gravitational instability of stratified discs, one must first classify and characterize vertical normal modes of perturbations in the simplified case of no self-gravity. Analysis of the modal structure of strati- fied, polytropic, compressible, non-self-gravitating discs has been done in several papers: Ruden et al. (1988, hereafter RPL), Korycansky & Pringle (1995, hereafter KP), Ogilvie (1998). In convectively stable discs, i.e., with subadiabatic vertical stratification, four principal types of vertical modes can be distinguished. These modes are: acoustic p-modes, surface gravity f-modes, buoyancy g-modes and inertial r-modes. The modes are named after their correspond- ing restoring forces, which can be well identified for each mode at horizontal wavelengths smaller than the disc height and are provided by one of the following: compressibil- ity/pressure, displacements of free surfaces of a disc, buoy- ancy due to vertical stratification and inertial forces due to disc rotation, respectively, for the p-, f-, g- and r-modes. In the case of superadiabatic stratification, the r- and g-modes merge and appear as a single mode, which becomes con- vectively unstable for horizontal wavenumbers larger than a certain value (RPL); the p- and f-modes remain qualita- tively unchanged. For neutral/adiabatic stratification, buoy- ancy is absent and the g-mode disappears. The main pur- pose of this paper is to investigate how self-gravity modifies the frequencies and the structure of the eigenfunctions of these modes, which mode acquires the largest positive growth rate due to self-gravity and, therefore, determines the on- set criterion and nature of the gravitational instability of a stratified disc. So, the mode dynamics in the 3D case can ap- pear more complex than that in the 2D one, where only the density wave mode can be subject to gravitational instabil- ity. Previously, Goldreich & Lynden-Bell (1965a, hereafter GLB) considered gravitational instability in a uniformly ro- tating gaseous slab with an adiabatic vertical stratification, thereby leaving out all modes associated with buoyancy. Other studies also considered the gravitational instability of 3D galactic discs, however, the analysis was essentially 2D, finite-thickness effects were only taken into account by means of various reduction factors in 2D dispersion rela- tions (Shu 1968; Romeo 1992, 1994). In all these studies, as in GLB, the main focus was on finding the criterion for the onset of gravitational instability, so that a full analysis of various types of vertical normal modes existing in stratified self-gravitating discs was not carried out. Actually, we gen- eralize the study of GLB to subadiabatic and superadiabatic stratifications having different modal structure. Another motivation for our study is that the f-mode is thought to play an important dynamical role in self- gravitating discs. The non-linear behaviour of 3D perturba- tions involving large surface distortions, as seen in numer- ical simulations, has been attributed to the surface grav- ity f-mode (Pickett et al. 2000). However, this was done without analysing the behaviour of other vertical modes under self-gravity. It was shown that the f-mode leads to a large energy dissipation in the vicinity of the disc sur- face, which may facilitate disc cooling, because the energy is deposited at smaller optical depth where it can be radi- ated away more quickly (see e.g., Johnson & Gammie 2003; Boley et al. 2006). Later it was realized that in fact the non- linear vertical motions in self-gravitating discs can be much more complex than just the f-mode and can have a shock character (shock bores, Boley & Durisen 2006). Thus, in the 3D case, the dynamics of self-gravitating discs is much richer and diverse than that of idealized 2D ones and requires fur- ther study. To fully understand the origin of such three- dimensional effects and what type of instability they are as- sociated with, one should start with a rigorous linear study of the characteristic properties of all the types of vertical normal modes mentioned above, not only the f-mode, in the presence of self-gravity. The present work is just a first step in this direction. Numerical simulations of self-gravitating discs are of- ten in the context of global discs (e.g., Pickett et al. 2000, 2003; Rice et al. 2003, 2005; Lodato & Rice 2004, 2005; Boley et al. 2006; Boley 2009) and, therefore, are not al- ways able to well resolve vertical motions, which, as shown in the present study, inevitably arise during the develop- ment of the gravitational instability associated with intrin- sically three-dimensional modes. So, these simulations may not quite accurately capture all the subtleties of the gravita- tional instability in 3D discs. In this connection, we should mention the work by Nelson (2006) that extensively dis- cusses the issue of vertical resolution and its importance in the outcome of the gravitational instability in numerical Axisymmetric modes in vertically stratified self-gravitating discs 3 simulations of self-gravitation discs. Resolving and analysing vertical motions are also crucial for properly understanding cooling processes in discs and, particularly, whether convec- tion is able to provide sufficiently effective cooling for disc fragmentation to occur, which is still a matter for debate in the literature (Boss 2004; Mayer et al. 2007; Boley et al. 2006, 2007; Rafikov 2007). In addition, these studies, for sim- plicity, use the criterion for gravitational instability based on the two-dimensional Toomre's parameter, which, as we will demonstrate, cannot always be uniquely mapped into an analogous three-dimensional stability parameter and give a precise criterion for the onset of gravitational instability. In this paper, following other works in a simi- lar vein: Lubow & Pringle (1993b, hereafter LP), KP, Lubow & Ogilvie (1998, hereafter LO98), we adopt the shearing box approximation and consider the linear dynam- ics of vertical normal modes of perturbations in a compress- ible, stratified, self-gravitating gaseous disc with Keplerian rotation. In the unperturbed disc, pressure and density are related by a polytropic law, which is a reasonably good ap- proximation for optically thick discs (see e.g., LO98). This allows us to consider the specific features of the dynam- ics for subadiabatic, adiabatic and superadiabatic vertical stratifications by simply varying the polytropic index. As a first step towards understanding the effects of self-gravity on the perturbation modes, we restrict ourselves to axisym- metric perturbations only. The linear results obtained here will form the basis for studying the non-linear development of gravitational instability in the local shearing box approx- imation that allows much higher numerical resolution than global disc models can afford. The paper is organized as follows. The physical model and basic equations are introduced in Section 2. The clas- sification of vertical modes in the absence of self-gravity is performed in Section 3. Effects of self-gravity on all normal modes are analysed in Section 4. In Section 5, we focus on the properties of gravitational instability in 3D. Compari- son between the criteria of gravitational instability in 3D and 2D is made in Section 6. Summary and discussions are given in Section 7. 2 PHYSICAL MODEL AND EQUATIONS in gaseous self-gravitating discs, three-dimensional In order to study the dynamics of modes following LP, KP, LO98, we adopt a local shearing box approxima- tion (Goldreich & Lynden-Bell 1965b). In the shearing box model, the disc dynamics is studied in a local Cartesian ref- erence frame rotating with the angular velocity of disc ro- tation at some fiducial radius from the central star, so that curvature effects due to cylindrical geometry of the disc are ignored. In this coordinate frame, the unperturbed differ- ential rotation of the disc manifests itself as a parallel az- imuthal flow with a constant velocity shear in the radial di- rection. A Coriolis force is included to take into account the effects of coordinate frame rotation. The vertical component of the gravity force of the central object is also present. As a result, we can write down the three-dimensional shearing box equations du dt + 2Ωz × u + ∇(cid:16)−qΩ2x2 + 1 2 Ω2z2 + ψ(cid:17) + 1 ρ∇p = 0, (1) dρ dt + ρ∇ · u = 0 and the equation of conservation of entropy d dt (cid:18) p ργ(cid:19) = 0. (2) (3) This set of equations is supplemented with Poisson's equa- tion to take care of disc self-gravity (cid:18) ∂ 2 ∂x2 + ∂ 2 ∂y2 + ∂ 2 ∂z2(cid:19) ψ = 4πGρ. (4) Here u = (ux, uy, uz) is the velocity in the local frame, p, ρ, ψ are, respectively, the pressure, density and the gravitational potential of the disc gas. Ω is the angular velocity of the local reference frame rotation as a whole, x, y, z are, respectively, the radial, azimuthal and vertical coordinates, z is the unit vector along the vertical direction and d/dt = ∂/∂t + u · ∇ is the total time derivative. The shear parameter is q = 1.5 for the Keplerian rotation considered in this paper. The adiabatic index, or the ratio of specific heats, γ = 1.4 as typical of a disc composed of molecular hydrogen; we adopt this value throughout the paper. 2.1 The equilibrium disc model Equations (1-4) have an equilibrium solution that is station- ary and axisymmetric. In this unperturbed state, the veloc- ity field represents, as noted above, a parallel azimuthal flow, u0, with a constant radial shear q: ux0 = uz0 = 0, uy0 = −qΩx. 1 ρ0 dp0 dz = Ω2z + In the shearing box, the equilibrium density ρ0, pressure p0 and gravitational potential ψ0 depend only on the vertical z−coordinate and satisfy the hydrostatic relation g0 ≡ − d2ψ0 dz2 = 4πGρ0. As in LP, KP and RPL, pressure and density in the unper- turbed disc are related by a polytropic relationship of the form dψ0 dz (6) (5) , p0 = Kρ1+1/s 0 , (7) where K is the polytropic constant and s > 0 is the poly- tropic index. The Brunt-Vaisala frequency squared is defined as g0 c2 s , (8) dρ0 0 c2 s dp0 dz − ρ0 (cid:16) 1 s + 1 − 1(cid:17) g2 dz (cid:17) = (cid:16) γs N 2 0 ≡ where c2 s = γp0/ρ0 is the adiabatic sound speed squared. If 1 + 1/s < γ (subadiabatic thermal stratification), then N 2 0 > 0 all along the height and the equilibrium vertical structure of the disc is convectively stable. In the oppo- site case 1 + 1/s > γ (superadiabatic thermal stratifica- tion), N 2 0 < 0 everywhere and this corresponds to a convec- tively unstable equilibrium. For 1 + 1/s = γ (adiabatic ther- mal stratification), N 2 0 = 0 and all the motions/modes due to buoyancy disappear. Later we will consider these three regimes separately. 4 G. R. Mamatsashvili and W. K. M. Rice To determine the vertical structure, we need to solve equations (5-6) subject to the boundary condition that the pressure vanish at the free surface of the disc. Because we have a polytropic model, it is convenient to work with the pseudo-enthalpy w0 = (s + 1)Kρ1/s 0 . The disc structure is also symmetric with respect to the mid- plane, z = 0, and, as a consequence, it follows from equa- tions (5-7) that the derivative of w0 at the midplane vanishes (i.e., dw0/dz(0) = 0). Because of this reflection symmetry, we consider only the upper half of the disc, z > 0. At the surface of the disc w0 = 0, similar to the pressure. This al- lows us to determine the equilibrium vertical structure of the disc. The non-dimensional variables being used throughout the paper are: 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 ρ 0 ρ 0 0 0 0.5 s=5 1 2 3 s=1.7 z 1 z 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 2 c s 2 c s s=5 1 2 3 z 1 z s=1.7 1.5 2 1.5 2 0 0 0.5 x → ρ0 → xΩ csm ρ0 ρm , y → , w0 → , yΩ csm w0 wm z → , cs → , zΩ csm cs csm , where ρm ≡ ρ0(0), wm ≡ w0(0), csm ≡ cs(0) are the mid- plane values of the equilibrium density, pseudo-enthalpy and sound speed. We define the three-dimensional analogue of Toomre's parameter as Q3D = Ω2 4πGρm , which is a measure of disc self-gravity (from now on until Section 6, we will use Q3D without subscript everywhere, so it should not be confused with the 2D Toomre's parameter). Using that at the midplane dw0/dz(0) = 0, we can derive from equations (5-7) a single equation for the normalized pseudo-enthalpy 2 s + 1 2γ (cid:16) dw0 dz (cid:17) = (1 − w0) + 1 Q(s + 1) (1 − ws+1 0 ). (9) 0, c2 The normalized density and sound speed are found from ρ0 = ws s = w0. Equation (9) shows that even though the disc is in Keplerian rotation (i.e., self-gravity in the ra- dial direction can be neglected), it must be included in de- termining the vertical structure. We integrate equation (9), starting at z = 0 with w0(0) = 1, until w0, monotonically decreasing with z, reaches zero at some finite height/edge z = h, which is therefore determined as a result of the inte- gration process. At this edge, the density and sound speed also vanish, ρ0(h) = 0, cs(h) = 0 (see also GLB and RPL). The height and entire vertical structure of a polytropic disc are therefore uniquely specified solely by Q and s, which are free parameters in equation (9). Figure 1 illustrates the sub- and superadiabatic equi- librium vertical structures obtained from equation (9) for various Q. For a fixed s, the disc height h decreases with decreasing Q. The sound speed is a decreasing function of z that does not permit the existence of two-dimensional modes in three-dimensional models of polytropic discs as opposed to isothermal ones (Lin et al. 1990, LP, KP). We also see that the equilibrium structures for sub- and superadiabatic cases look similar except that they have, respectively, every- where positive and negative N 2 0 that diverges at the surface because the sound speed vanishes there. Figure 1. Vertical variations of the normalized density and squared sound speed for subadiabatic (s = 5) and superadia- batic (s = 1.7) equilibrium states with Q = 0.1 (thick solid lines), Q = 0.5 (dashed-dotted lines), Q = 1 (dotted lines), Q = 10 (thin solid lines) and the non-self-gravitating case (Q → ∞, dashed lines). The lines corresponding to Q = 10 are close to those in the non-self-gravitating limit, implying that the role of self-gravity is negligible for Q > 10. The disc heights, h, are different depending on Q and s. 2.2 Perturbation equations We consider here small axisymmetric (∂/∂y = 0) perturba- tions of the form u′, ρ′, p′, ψ ′ ∝ exp(−iωt + ikx) about the equilibrium states found above, where ω and k are the fre- quency and the radial wavenumber, respectively. Without a loss of generality, we assume throughout that k is non- negative, k > 0. After switching to non-dimensional vari- ables: t → Ωt, ω → ω Ω , k → kcsm Ω , N0 → N0 Ω , g0 → g0 Ωcsm , u′ x → u′ x csm , u′ y → u′ y csm , u′ z → u′ z csm , ρ′ ρm p′ ρmc2 , p′ → , ψ ′ → ρ′ → we can derive from equations (1-4) the following set of equa- tions governing the linear dynamics of axisymmetric pertur- bations sm , ψ ′ c2 sm y − ikψ ′ ikp′ ρ0 − iωu′ − iωu′ − iωu′ + 2u′ x = − y = (q − 2)u′ dp′ dz − g0 z = − 1 ρ0 x ρ′ ρ0 − dψ ′ dz − iωρ′ + ikρ0u′ x + d dz (ρ0u′ z) = 0 − iω(p′ − c2 sρ′) + ρ0c2 sN 2 g0 0 u′ z = 0 (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (cid:18)−k2 + d2 dz2(cid:19) ψ ′ = ρ′ Q . Axisymmetric modes in vertically stratified self-gravitating discs 5 (15) p = g0uz at z = h. (21) If we now make the changes: iu′ z, ωp′/ρ0 → p′, ωψ ′ → ψ ′ and eliminate u′ y, ρ′ from equations (10), (11), (13), we arrive at the following set of equations for the three basic quantities u′ z, p′, ψ ′ (henceforth primes will be omitted) z → u′ x, u′ uz −(cid:18) 1 s − c2 duz dz = g0 c2 s dp dz = N 2 0 g0 p + (ω2 − N 2 Q (cid:18) p c2 s ρ0 d2ψ dz2 − k2ψ = k2 ω2 − κ2(cid:19) p + 0 )uz − dψ dz + N 2 0 g0 uz(cid:19) , k2ψ ω2 − κ2 (16) (17) (18) where the non-dimensional epicyclic frequency κ is given by κ2 = 2(2 − q) = 1. Notice that the density pertur- bations on the right hand side of the linearized Poisson's equation (18) consist of two physically different parts. The density perturbations due to compressibility, which are in- versely proportional to the squared sound speed and pro- portional to the pressure perturbation, and the density per- turbations due to the stratified background, which are pro- portional to the vertical velocity perturbation and N 2 0 . This latter term due to stratification is obviously absent in the two-dimensional analysis of gravitational instability as well as when the disc is adiabatic (see GLB). Equations (16- 18) form the basis for determining the axisymmetric normal modes of perturbations existing in compressible, stratified, polytropic, self-gravitating discs. In the non-self-gravitating limit, these equations reduce to the main equations of KP. The reflection symmetry of the unperturbed disc allows us to take the eigenfunctions/modes to be either even or odd with respect to z. So, to determine the eigenfrequencies (dis- persion diagrams, that is, ω as a function of k for various branches) and eigenfunctions, we can numerically integrate the main equations (16-18) only in the upper half, 0 6 z 6 h, of the full vertical extent of the disc provided that suitable boundary conditions are imposed at z = 0 and z = h. In other words, we need to solve a boundary value problem. Here the disc height h, as noted above, is determined by the parameters Q and s. By inspecting equations (16-18), it is clear that a normal mode whose pressure p and po- tential ψ perturbations are even functions under reflection in z, has odd vertical velocity uz and gravitational poten- tial derivative dψ/dz perturbations under reflection and vice versa. We define a normal mode as being 'even' ('odd') if the corresponding vertical velocity and gravitational poten- tial derivative are odd (even) functions of z (this convention agrees with that of Ogilvie 1998, but differs from LP and KP). Thus, the boundary conditions at the midplane, z = 0, for the even modes are: uz(0) = 0, dψ/dz(0) = 0 and for the odd modes are: p(0) = 0, ψ(0) = 0. (19) (20) At z = h we impose the usual free-surface boundary con- dition for which the Lagrangian pressure perturbation van- ishes. In our new non-dimensional variables this translates as The boundary condition for the gravitational potential can be derived by treating the surface displacement as a surface distribution of gravitating matter at z = h. Using the conti- nuity of potential across the boundary, Gauss's flux theorem and the fact that outside the disc, at z → ±∞, gravitational potential should vanish, we arrive at the following condition at the disc surface (see e.g., GLB, Lubow & Pringle 1993a) dψ dz + kψ = − uzρ0 Q at z = h. (22) Equations (16-18) supplemented with boundary conditions (21),(22) at the surface z = h and (19),(20) at the mid- plane fully determine a boundary value problem. Using these boundary conditions and variational principle, it can be eas- ily shown that ω2 is real (GLB, RPL) that much alleviates the search of eigenfrequencies. We integrate these equations from z = h downwards to z = 0 separately for the even modes under conditions (19) and for the odd modes un- der conditions (20). We will see below that in the presence of self-gravity, the dispersion diagrams for these two mode parities are quite different. In other words, self-gravity in- fluences even and odd modes, or changes their dispersion characteristics, in different ways. As is typical, for a given equilibrium structure, that is, for given Q and s, and for a given radial wavenumber k, midplane boundary conditions can be satisfied only for certain values of ω, yielding disper- sion relations ω(k) for different branches of modes classified below. We use a Runge-Kutta integrator and root-finding algorithms of MATLAB package to first numerically solve differential equations (16-18) and then find eigenfrequencies. 3 THE CLASSIFICATION OF VERTICAL MODES In this section, we for the moment remove self-gravity (put ψ → 0, Q → ∞) from the perturbation equations (16-18) and from the equilibrium in order to classify and character- ize all the vertical axisymmetric normal modes existing in a three-dimensional disc. In special cases, an analogous classi- fication of modes in non-self-gravitating discs has been done previously by several authors (RPL, LP, KP, Ogilvie 1998). The aim here is to briefly review and synthesize the results from these studies. In the next section, we will again switch on self-gravity and investigate how it affects the characteris- tics of these modes. Accordingly, in the non-self-gravitating case, we need the midplane and surface boundary conditions discussed above, but only for pressure and vertical velocity perturbations. Figure 2 shows the typical dispersion diagrams for three types of equilibria: subadiabatic (1 + 1/s < γ), adiabatic (1 + 1/s = γ) and superadiabatic (1 + 1/s > γ) stratifica- tions. In the subadiabatic case, one can identify four distinct classes of vertical normal modes (see also KP, Ogilvie 1998). These modes are: the acoustic p-modes, the surface grav- ity f-modes, the buoyancy g-modes and the inertial r-modes the restoring forces for which at large radial wavenumbers kh ≫ 1 are mainly provided, respectively, by compressibil- ity/pressure, by the displacements of free surface of the disc, by buoyancy due to the vertical entropy gradient and by 6 G. R. Mamatsashvili and W. K. M. Rice (a) 50 40 ω2 30 20 10 1 0 8 (b) ω2 6 4 2 1 0 2 4 2 4 6 k 8 10 12 (d) 60 40 ω2 20 1 0 60 (f) 40 ω2 20 1 0 2 4 2 4 6 k 6 k 8 10 12 8 10 12 6 k ω2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 1 ω2 0 −1 −2 0 (c) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 ω2 8 10 12 0 0 2 4 8 10 12 6 k (e) 2 4 6 k 8 10 12 (g) 2 4 6 k 8 10 12 5, po 4, po 4, pe 3, po 3, pe 2, po 2, pe 1, po 1, pe Figure 2. Dispersion diagrams in the non-self-gravitating case for a subadiabatic disc with s = 5 (panels a, b, c), for an adiabatic disc with s = 2.5 (panels d, e) and for a superadiabatic disc with s = 1.7 (panels f, g). The solid lines in panels (a),(d),(f) show the frequencies for different branches of the surface gravity f- and acoustic p-modes vs. radial wavenumber k. In order of increasing frequency these branches/curves are f e, f o, pe 5 (superscripts denote the even and odd modes, which are numbered, respectively, according to the number of nodes of vertical velocity and pressure perturbations in the interval 0 < z 6 h). Although, for large k, the frequencies of even and odd modes coalesce. The dashed lines in these panels correspond to frequencies of the f-modes computed in the incompressible limit. The solid lines in panel (b) show the convectively stable g-mode branches, which in order of decreasing frequency are go,e 5 . Here the frequencies of even and odd modes coincide. The solid lines in panels (c),(e) show the r-mode branches, which in order of increasing frequency are ro 0 are the basic even and odd r-modes and subscript '0' means that, respectively, vertical velocity and pressure perturbations for them have no nodes in the interval 0 < z 6 h. In this respect, our numbering of modes differs from that of Ogilvie 1998). The solid lines in panel (g) show the convectively unstable g-modes, which in order of increasing ω2 are go 0 denotes the basic even g-mode, the corresponding vertical velocity perturbation for which has no nodes in the range 0 < z 6 h). Similar to the p-modes, the convectively unstable even and odd g-modes coalesce at large k. In each panel, the dashed lines show the corresponding mode branches computed for the incompressible case with the same ordering of eigenfrequencies. From panels (b),(g), we see that compressibility most strongly affects the convectively stable and unstable g-modes. 0 and ro 4 , go,e 3 (ge 1 , go,e 2 , go,e 3 , go,e 0, go 2, ge 2, go 4, ge 1, go 3, ge 1, ro 2, re 0, ro 1, re 1, ge 0, re 2, ro 3, re 3 (re inertial forces due to disc rotation. The existence of the g- modes in polytropic discs is attributable to the variation of the sound speed and N0 with height; the latter diverges at the disc surface giving rise to the trapped g-mode there. For 1 + 1/s < γ, all these modes have ω2 > 0 and, therefore, are stable. The p-, f- and g-modes are high-frequency modes with frequencies always larger than the epicyclic frequency, ω2 > κ2, while the r-mode is of low-frequency with ω2 6 κ2 (we remind that hereafter κ = 1). For adiabatic stratification, there is no buoyancy (N 2 0 = 0) and, therefore the g-mode disappears, while other modes remain qualitatively unchanged. Similarly, the r-mode does Axisymmetric modes in vertically stratified self-gravitating discs 7 not exist in a disc that has zero epicyclic frequency. For 1 + 1/s > γ, the g-mode becomes convectively unstable (ω2 < 0) for radial wavenumbers larger than a certain value because of negative buoyancy. Its characteristic timescale (growth rate) can be of the order of the epicyclic frequency or less and due to this, it interferes with motions corresponding to the r-mode. Consequently, in the superadiabatic case, the r- and g-modes merge at ω2 6 κ2 and appear as a single mode, which we still call the g-mode and not the r-mode, because the behaviour of corresponding eigenfunctions with height in this case is similar to that of the convectively stable g-mode (see also RPL); the p- and f-modes are not much affected. All these modes come in even and odd pairs. In Fig. 2, even (odd) modes are numbered according to the number of nodes of the vertical velocity (pressure) perturbation in the interval 0 < z 6 h (the node at z = 0 is not counted). We also see the coalescence of the dispersion curves of the even and odd p- and f-modes and also the convectively un- stable even and odd g-modes as k increases past a certain point, which depends on the mode number (RPL, KP). This is associated with a transition from oscillatory to evanes- cent behaviour of eigenfunctions. We do not plot eigenfunc- tions here, as an extensive discussion of their properties can be found in RPL, KP, LO98 and Ogilvie (1998). We only mention that the eigenfunctions of the p- and g-modes are trapped near the surfaces and decay towards the mid- plane, while the eigenfunctions of the r-mode are concen- trated near the midplane and decay towards the surfaces. As for the eigenfunctions of the fundamental f-mode, they have no nodes and monotonically decay from the surfaces to the midplane. Below we show that these properties of eigenfunctions are altered due to self-gravity. Specifically, the number of nodes along each branch of the dispersion di- agrams, which is preserved in the non-self-gravitating limit, is no longer constant in the presence of self-gravity. The fre- quencies of the p- and r-modes increase with mode number. The frequencies and growth rates of the convectively sta- ble and unstable g-modes, respectively, decrease with the mode number. These are the well-known general properties of vertical modes in polytropic discs. Although each mode type has its dominant restoring force, one out of the above mentioned four types (compress- ibility, surface gravity, buoyancy, inertial forces), the other three forces also contribute to a certain degree for small ra- dial wavenumbers kh < ∼ 1. For example, the p- and f-modes are modified both by rotation/inertial forces and buoyancy, the f-mode is also modified by compressibility, the g-mode is modified by rotation and compressibility and the r-mode is modified by buoyancy and compressibility. For the sake of comparison with the relevant result from previous stud- ies, we are particularly interested in to what degree com- pressibility modifies generally non-compressive f-, g- and r- modes. So, we decided to juxtapose the dispersion diagrams for these modes computed separately in the compressible and incompressible cases. We take the incompressible limit by formally letting the adiabatic index go to infinity, γ → ∞ (Ogilvie 1998). After that equations (16-18) without self- gravity take the form duz dz = k2 ω2 − κ2 p dp dz = N 2 0 g0 p + (ω2 − N 2 0 )uz. We solved these equations with the same boundary condi- tions and found the dispersion diagrams of the f-, g- and r-modes that survive in this limit (obviously, the acoustic p-mode disappears). The results are plotted in Fig. 2 with dashed lines. Notice that by taking the incompressible limit in this manner, we have been able to retain the f-mode, as ex- pected. Instead, KP set the density perturbations to zero in the linearized continuity equation (anelastic approximation) that resulted in the f-mode disappearing in their incompress- ible limit. We see that compressibility most strongly affects the convectively stable and unstable g-mode branches with small mode numbers (Figs. 2b,2g), or equivalently with ver- tical extent comparable to the disc height, even at large radial wavenumbers (Ogilvie 1998). The frequencies of the f- and r-modes do not change much, indicating that these modes are nearly incompressible. 4 VERTICAL MODES IN THE PRESENCE OF SELF-GRAVITY Having characterized all types of axisymmetric normal modes in a stratified disc, let us now compute the disper- sion diagrams taking into account self-gravity in the per- turbation equations and in the equilibrium. This will allow us to understand how the frequencies and the structure of the eigenfunctions of the above-described mode types are altered by self-gravity, which mode acquires the largest pos- itive growth rate in the presence of self-gravity and, thus determines the onset criterion and nature of gravitational instability of a disc. In other words, we return to the bound- ary value problem formulated in Section 2, which is repre- sented by equations (16-18) supplemented with boundary conditions (21),(22) at the surface and conditions (19),(20) of the even and odd symmetry of a solution at the midplane. For each Q and s, we first determine the corresponding ver- tical distribution of the equilibrium quantities in equations (16-18), ρ0, c2 0 , with height as described in Section 2 and then based on this compute the normal modes. s, g0, N 2 Figures 3,4,5 and 6 show the typical dispersion dia- grams for the p-, f-, g- and r-modes in a self-gravitating disc for subadiabatic, adiabatic and superadiabatic vertical stratifications. We separately plot the dispersion diagrams of the even and odd parities for each mode type to clearly see the influence of self-gravity on them, which, as evident from these figures, depends on the mode parity. Unlike in the non-self-gravitating limit, the number of nodes of the vertical velocity and pressure perturbations in the presence of self-gravity are not preserved along each mode branch. However, as we will see below, at large k, the influence of self-gravity on the mode dynamics is small and the disper- sion diagrams merge with their non-self-gravitating coun- terparts (shown with dashed curves in Figs. 3, 5). So, the naming of the modes for smaller k, where the effect of self- gravity is important, is done by continuity with the large-k limit for each mode branch. 8 G. R. Mamatsashvili and W. K. M. Rice 80 60 ω2 40 20 1 0 2 80 60 ω2 40 20 1 0 2 (b) (e) ω2 ω2 2.6 2.4 2.2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0 2.6 2.4 2.2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0 (a) 6 8 (d) 6 8 4 k 4 k ω2 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 (c) 2 k 4 0 2 4 6 k ω2 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 (f) 2 k 4 0 2 4 6 k Figure 3. Dispersion diagrams of vertical modes in a subadiabatic self-gravitating disc with s = 5 and Q = 0.2. Shown are (a) the even p- and f-modes, (b) the even g-mode, (c) the even r-mode, (d) the odd p- and f-modes, (e) the odd g-mode, (f) the odd r-mode. Dashed lines are the corresponding branches computed without self-gravity in the perturbations, but with the same self-gravitating equilibrium. The frequency ordering and mode naming are the same as in Fig. 2. Self-gravity reduces/shifts the frequencies of the even and odd p-, f-modes and the even g- and r-modes mainly in the range 0 6 k 6 2; the frequencies of the odd g- and r-modes are almost unaffected by self-gravity. The frequency of the basic even r-mode (denoted above as re 0) is modified most strongly by self-gravity as evidenced by the largest dip on the corresponding dispersion curve in panel (c). For large k and/or large mode numbers, the effect of self-gravity becomes weak and the dispersion curves merge with the dashed ones for the non-self-gravitating case. 4.1 Subadiabatic stratification Consider first the subadiabatic case (Fig. 3), where we again have the p-, f-, g- and r-modes, but their dispersion diagrams are modified/shifted from their non-self-gravitating counter- parts towards lower values due to self-gravity. As illustrated in Figs. 3a,3d, self-gravity reduces the frequencies of all branches of the p- and f-modes, for both even and odd pari- ties, but it more affects the f-modes. The situation for the g- and r-modes is different (Figs. 3b,3c,3e,3f): only the frequen- cies of the even g- and r-modes are reduced by self-gravity mostly for radial wavenumbers in the range 0 6 k 6 2 (dips on the corresponding dispersion curves in Figs. 3b,3c indi- cating deviations from the non-self-gravitating dashed ones), whereas the frequencies of the odd g- and r-modes are al- most unaffected by self-gravity. The frequencies of the fun- damental f-modes, the first few branches of the p-modes and also the first few branches of the even g- and r-modes are reduced noticeably. With increasing mode number and/or radial wavenumber, the effect of self-gravity on the eigenfre- quencies gradually falls off, because the corresponding eigen- functions become of smaller and smaller horizontal and/or vertical scale (the number of nodes increases) and take the form similar to that in the non-self-gravitating limit. As a result, the dispersion diagrams become more and more identical to their non-self-gravitating counterparts. The or- dering of frequencies for the even and odd p-, f-, g- and r-modes, as it is in the non-self-gravitating case (see Fig. 2): ω2(r) 6 κ2 6 ω2(g) < ω2(f) < ω2(p), is preserved in the self-gravitating case as well, however small the value of Q. Note also in Fig. 4 that the frequencies of the the even and odd f-modes and also of the basic even g-mode, for which the influence of self-gravity is stronger, never fall below the epicyclic frequency with decreasing Q and, therefore, these modes always remain gravitationally stable (we also checked that the same situation holds for the dispersion curves of the even and odd f-modes in the adiabatic and superadiabatic cases described below). This is a consequence of the three- dimensionality of the disc. Thus, as evident from Figs. 3c,4d, self-gravity most significantly affects the basic branch of the Axisymmetric modes in vertically stratified self-gravitating discs 9 Q=0.2 Q=0.05 Q=0.01 60 40 20 ω2 60 40 20 ω2 1 0 2 4 (a) 8 10 12 6 k 1 0 2 4 (b) 8 10 12 6 k ω2 12 10 8 6 4 2 1 0 ω2 0 −5 −10 −15 (c) 2 4 6 k 8 10 12 −20 0 2 4 (d) 8 10 12 6 k Figure 4. Dispersion curves for s = 5 and Q = 0.01 (dashed- dotted lines), Q = 0.05 (dashed lines), Q = 0.2 (solid lines). Pan- els (a),(b) show the even and odd f-modes, respectively. Panel (c) shows the basic even g-mode and panel (d) shows the basic even r-mode. The frequencies of the f- and g-modes never fall below the epicyclic frequency with decreasing Q and, therefore, are al- ways stable. The basic even r-mode, which is most significantly affected by self-gravity, becomes unstable when the dip on the corresponding dispersion curve crosses the ω2 = 0−axis. This dip deepens and broadens with decreasing Q. even r-mode and only this branch can become unstable due to self-gravity. From Fig. 4d, it is seen that the dip on this branch deepens and broadens with decreasing Q. (We de- note the wavenumber at which the minimum of this dip is located by km.) The gravitational instability sets in when the dip's minimum first touches the ω2 = 0−axis at some Qcr and then farther extends into the unstable ω2 < 0 region for Q < Qcr. We will demonstrate in Section 5 that the basic even r-mode becomes strongly compressible at k ∼ km (Fig. 8), as opposed to the r-mode in a non-self-gravitating disc, and the density perturbations due to compressibility are re- sponsible for its gravitational instability. For s = 5, we find Qcr = 0.168, which gives H = 2h = 2.96 for the disc total thickness, and km = 0.8 (see Fig. 12). Note that the charac- teristic radial scale of instability λm = 2π/km = 7.85 is not much greater than the disc thickness H. In self-gravitating discs, compressibility and inertial forces play an important role in the dynamics of the basic even r-mode at wavelengths λ ∼ λm ∼ H and so it resembles a 2D density wave at such wavelengths (see Section 4.4). The fact that the character- istic scale of gravitational instability λm turns out to com- parable to the disc thickness may offer a clue why angular momentum transport due to self-gravity tends to be a lo- cal phenomenon (e.g., Gammie 2001; Lodato & Rice 2004; Boley et al. 2006). In this respect, it should also be men- tioned that the analogous gravitational instability of low- frequency modes in a strongly compressed gaseous slab was also found by Lubow & Pringle (1993a). In their analysis, these modes, called neutral modes, are basically degenerate r-modes, since the compressed gaseous slab was not rotating. > 4.2 Adiabatic stratification In the adiabatic case (Figs. 5a-5d), there is no g-mode and the behaviour of the p-, f- and r-modes under self-gravity has qualitatively the same character as in the subadiabatic case above. Again, the basic branch of the even r-mode ap- pears to be most significantly affected by self-gravity (the corresponding dispersion curve in Fig. 5c has the same form as that in Fig. 3c) and becomes gravitationally unstable. The ω2 of the p- and f-modes, although lowered by self- gravity, always remain larger or equal to κ2 irrespective of the value of Q. In this case, s = 2.5 and the corresponding Qcr = 0.177 and km = 0.81. Again the radial scale of insta- bility λm = 2π/km = 7.75 is not far from the disc thickness for these parameters, H = 2h = 2.08. 4.3 Superadiabatic stratification The superadiabatic case (Figs. 5e-5h) is interesting, because at ω2 6 κ2, as classified above, instead of the r-mode there is the g-mode, which in addition to convective instability can also exhibit gravitational instability. As in the non-self- gravitating case, for radial wavenumbers larger than a cer- tain value, all the branches of the g-mode become unstable because of the negative vertical entropy gradient. From Fig. 5g we see that for 0 6 k 6 2, self-gravity produces dips on the g-mode dispersion curves, again preferably for the even parity ones. When Q drops sufficiently, the dip on the ba- sic branch of the even g-mode, which appears to be most affected by self-gravity, starts to cross the ω2 = 0-axis in a way similar to that of the basic even r-mode branch above and this signals the onset of gravitational instability. For s = 1.7, adopted in Fig. 5, we find Qcr = 0.184, which gives a thickness H = 2h = 1.76, and km = 0.83, so that λm = 2π/km = 7.57 > ∼ H. As for the p- and f-modes, they behave under self-gravity in exactly the same manner as in the above cases. In particular, although their frequencies are reduced, they can never become gravitationally unsta- ble even for very small values of Q. Thus, for superadiabatic stratification, the basic even g-mode can exhibit two types of instabilities: gravitational and convective (see Fig. 6). As we see from Figs. 5g,6a, at moderate Q ∼ Qcr, the radial scales for the activity of self-gravity and convective insta- bility are well separated, so that these two effects do not interfere with each other in the linear regime. For Q = 0.1 in Fig. 6a, self-gravity is dominant at 0 6 k 6 2.55, while convective instability occurs at k > 4.27, where the effect of self-gravity is weak (a similar situation is for Q = 0.2 in Fig. 5g). However, for very small Q ≪ Qcr, the radial scales of gravitational and convective instabilities overlap (Fig. 6b), but the gas motion for such radial scales in the case of very strong gravitational instability would hardly resemble con- vective motions (it will look more like that in Fig. 11 below); convection is simply disrupted by gravitational instability. Therefore, we can conclude that unless a disc is strongly self- gravitating, self-gravity has little influence on the properties of convective motions and on the (Schwarzschild) criterion for the onset of convective instability that is equivalent to N 2 0 < 0. 10 G. R. Mamatsashvili and W. K. M. Rice ω2 ω2 80 60 40 20 1 0 80 60 40 20 1 0 80 60 ω2 40 20 (a) 10 1 0 80 60 ω2 40 20 (e) 10 1 0 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k 1 0.8 0.6 ω2 0.4 0.2 (b) 10 0 0 (c) 4 2 k 1 0.5 ω2 0 −0.5 1 0.8 0.6 ω2 0.4 0.2 0 0 1 0.5 ω2 0 −0.5 (d) 4 2 k (f) −1 (g) −1 10 0 2 4 k 6 8 0 2 (h) 6 8 4 k Figure 5. Dispersion diagrams for vertical modes in a self-gravitating disc with Q = 0.2 for an adiabatic stratification with s = 2.5 (panels a-d) and for a superadiabatic stratification with s = 1.7 (panels e-h). Shown are (a,e) the even p- and f-modes, (b,f) the odd p- and f-modes, (c) the even r-mode, (d) the odd r-mode, (g) the convectively unstable even g-mode and (h) the odd g-mode. The frequency ordering and mode naming are the same as in Fig. 2. As before, dashed curves correspond to the dispersion diagrams calculated without self-gravity in the perturbations. The behaviour of the p-, f- and r-modes in the adiabatic case is similar to that in Fig. 3. In the superadiabatic case, the dispersion curves of the even g-mode have dips caused by self-gravity in the interval 0 6 k 6 2, while the odd g-mode is almost unaffected by self-gravity. The largest dip occurs for the basic branch of the even g-mode (denoted above as ge 0) in panel (g), which appears to be most significantly influenced by self-gravity. For large k and/or large mode numbers, the effect of self-gravity becomes weak and the dispersion curves merge with dashed ones for the non-self-gravitating case. Due to the superadiabatic stratification, the even and odd g-modes are convectively unstable (i.e., have ω2 < 0) in the range k > 3.91, where the influence of self-gravity is small. 4.4 Analogy with the 2D density wave theory and the 2D density wave theory in thin self-gravitating discs, which actually appears to do a decent qualitative job. From the three cases considered above, we conclude that the basic branch of the low-frequency (ω2 6 κ2) even mode, which is the r-mode, in the case of subadiabatic and adia- batic stratifications, and the g-mode, in the case of superadi- abatic stratification, is most subject to the influence of self- gravity. These modes determine the gravitational instability in vertically stratified discs. As we have clearly seen in all the above cases, the radial scale of the instability is comparable, though a bit larger than the disc thickness, λm ∼ H, which in turn implies that a 2D analysis of the gravitational insta- bility is at most marginally valid and the rigorous stability (linear) analysis of self-gravitating discs should be three- dimensional. However, despite the 2D treatment only being marginal, we can still find similarities between our results > Consider an equivalent zero-thickness disc with the ρ0dz. sound speed csm Then the well-known dispersion relation of axisymmetric 2D density waves in the thin disc is (e.g., Goldreich & Tremaine 1978) 1 and the surface density Σ0 = R h −h 2 Q2D ω2 = k2 − where we have used the same normalization as before and k + 1, 1 In fact, there are other options for choosing the sound speed as a some kind of height-averaged value. We address this question in Section 6, but for the present purpose this does not make much difference. Axisymmetric modes in vertically stratified self-gravitating discs 11 (a) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 −0.2 −0.4 −0.6 −0.8 −1 ω2 0 2 4 k 6 8 ω2 1 0 −2 −4 −6 −8 −10 −12 −14 −16 −18 −20 0 (b) 5 k 10 15 k m 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Q Figure 6. Dispersion curves of the basic even g-mode for a su- peradiabatic stratification with s = 1.7 for (a) Q = 0.1 and (b) Q = 0.01. Dashed lines show the same branches computed without self-gravity in the perturbations. For Q = 0.1, the basic even g-mode exhibits gravitational instability in the vicinity of km = 1.15 and convective instability in the range k > 4.27, where the influence of self-gravity is weak. For Q = 0.01, the effect of self-gravity is much stronger and the radial scales of gravitational and convective instabilities overlap in the range 4.25 6 k 6 8.5. because of that Q2D = csmΩ/πGΣ0. This dispersion rela- tion is a parabola with a minimum at the Jeans wavenum- ber kJ = 1/Q2D. This is the wavenumber, at which the effect of self-gravity is most prominent, and if Q2D < 1 it gives the characteristic scale of gravitational instability. At small k ≪ kJ , 2D density waves are dominated by self- gravity and inertial forces, while at large k ≫ kJ , pres- sure/compressibility dominates over self-gravity and density waves appear as an acoustic mode. At k ∼ kJ all three fac- tors can be important. Let us now look at the dispersion curves of the basic branches of the even r- and convectively unstable even g-modes in Figs. 3c,5c,5g. They have similar parabolic shape in the self-gravity and compressibility dom- inated regime at k ∼ km with the linear phase at smaller k ≪ km, where only self-gravity and inertial forces play a role. This linear phase at long wavelengths is well repro- duced by the 2D dispersion relation. Therefore, we can iden- tify the wavenumber km, at which the effect of self-gravity on the 3D modes is largest, with the Jeans wavenumber kJ . In some sense, in the case of instability when Q < Qcr, km gives a more accurate value for the radial scale, λm, of the gravitationally most unstable mode than that given by the Jeans wavenumber kJ in the 2D model. For example, from Fig. 12 we find that the vertical structure (ρ0) calculated at s = 5 and Qcr = 0.168 gives the corresponding Q2D = 0.76 and kJ = 1.32, which differs from km = 0.8 found above for these parameters. Moreover, we will see in Section 6 that the criterion for gravitational instability based on the 3D calcu- lations, i.e. Q < Qcr, is more exact than the 2D criterion Q2D < 1. In the 2D case, as shown above, the Jeans wavenumber kJ = 1/Q2D, implying that it is determined solely by com- petition between self-gravity and compressibility/pressure. It is now interesting to see how an analogous characteristic Figure 7. Dependence of km on Q for s = 5, which very closely follows the power law Q−1/2 (shown with dashed line and scaled appropriately). The gravitational instability sets in at Q = Qcr = 0.168 that gives km = 0.8. wavenumber km depends on Q in the 3D case. From Fig. 7 we see that this dependence has a power law character Q−1/2, which means that the value of km is again set by self-gravity and compressibility, as in the 2D case, so that the disc rotation plays a role only in determining ω2 but not km. Indeed, the only lengthscale that can be constructed from the sound speed csm, density ρm and gravitational con- stant G without the angular velocity, Ω, of disc rotation is csm/√Gρm (analogous to the Jeans length of a collapsing 3D cloud). If we normalize it by csm/Ω, we get 2√πQ1/2, giving the above power law dependence for the correspond- ing non-dimensional wavenumber √πQ−1/2 to which km is proportional. Thus, the basic even r-mode or, in the case of superadia- batic stratification, the basic even g-mode at k < ∼ km exhibit many of the characteristics of 2D density waves and could be regarded as their 3D analogues at such radial wavenumbers (see also Section 5). If continued to k ≫ km, the density wave mode would thus connect up to the large-k parts of these two modes dominated, respectively, by inertial forces and by negative buoyancy, instead of merging with the com- pressible p-mode, as might seem at first sight from the 2D dispersion relation. However, the limit k ≫ km, equivalent to λ ≪ H, means the breakdown of the 2D approximation and, therefore, the concept of 2D density waves at k ≫ km would not be well-defined. 5 GRAVITATIONAL INSTABILITY IN 3D: PROPERTIES OF THE BASIC BRANCH OF THE LOW-FREQUENCY EVEN R-MODE In this section we concentrate only on the properties of the gravitationally unstable basic even r-mode. As we have seen, the behaviour of the convectively unstable basic even g-mode under self-gravity has a qualitatively similar character. 12 G. R. Mamatsashvili and W. K. M. Rice ω2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 −0.2 −0.4 −0.6 −0.8 0 1 2 3 k 4 5 6 Figure 8. Dispersion curves of the basic even r-mode at s = 5, Q = 0.1 with corresponding h = 1.22. Dotted line corre- sponds to the non-self-gravitating case, dashed-dotted -- to the incompressible case with self-gravity and solid line -- to the self- gravitating case with compressibility. The influence of self-gravity on the basic even r-mode is very weak in the incompressible limit and the dashed-dotted dispersion curve almost coincides with the dotted one in the non-self-gravitating limit; a slight deviation (dip) at small k is due to the stratified background. 5.1 Effect of compressibility As noted above, in the Poisson's equation, the density per- turbations giving rise to the gravitational potential pertur- bations can be due to compressibility and due to the strat- ification of the equilibrium vertical structure. As is evident from Fig. 2c, in non-self-gravitating discs, the r-mode is nearly incompressible. So, it is interesting to see if it still re- mains incompressible in self-gravitating discs and which out of these two sources of density perturbations is ultimately responsible for the gravitational instability. In order to ex- plore this, we again computed the dispersion curve of the basic even r-mode in the incompressible limit of equations (16-18), which take the form: k2 duz dz = dp dz = ω2 − κ2 (p + ψ) p + (ω2 − N 2 N 2 0 g0 dψ dz (23) (24) 0 )uz − uz. (25) ρ0 Q N 2 0 g0 d2ψ dz2 − k2ψ = supplemented with the same boundary conditions. Notice that on the right hand side of Poisson's equation (25), only the density perturbation due to stratification remains. In Fig. 8, we compare the dispersion curves of the basic even r-mode obtained in the incompressible limit to those computed for the compressible self-gravitating and non-self- gravitating cases. It is clear that in self-gravitating discs, the basic even r-mode becomes compressible at k ∼ km thereby providing density perturbation for the gravitational poten- tial and, therefore, accounting for the large dip on the dis- persion curve. The dispersion curve in the incompressible limit deviates only very slightly from that in the non-self- gravitating case, because of the second source of density 20 0 u x −20 −40 −60 0 20 0 p −20 −40 −60 0 u z ρ 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 20 0 −20 −40 −60 0 0.5 z 0.5 z 1 1 0.5 z 0.5 z 1 1 Figure 9. Vertical structures of the radial velocity ux, the ver- tical velocity uz, the pressure p and the density ρ perturbations constituting the eigenfunctions of the gravitationally unstable ba- sic even r-mode for s = 5, Q = 0.1, h = 1.22, km = 1 with the corresponding largest growth rate ω2 min = −0.75. Dashed lines show the eigenfunctions (scaled arbitrarily for plotting purposes) in the non-self-gravitating case for the same parameters except ω2 = 0.99. Notice that in the non-self-gravitating case, the eigen- functions are more concentrated near the midplane, whereas in the self-gravitating case they vary over the whole vertical extent. perturbation, i.e. stratification, which turns out to be much smaller than that associated with compressibility. Such a comparison also shows that the primary cause of gravita- tional instability in incompressible discs, as described in GLB and Lubow & Pringle (1993a), is the displacements of free-surfaces. In our case, the equilibrium density vanishes at the surface, so that the effect of surface displacements on the growth rate of instability is null (see boundary condition 22) and in the incompressible case only density perturbation due to stratification, as shown, is hardly sufficient for grav- itational instability. 5.2 Eigenfunctions and spatial structure Here we compute the vertical structure of the eigenfunctions of the gravitationally unstable basic even r-mode and also find what type of motions it induces. We take Q = 0.1 and s = 5, which gives h = 1.22 for the disc height. For these parameters, the dispersion curve of this mode in Fig. 8 has a minimum ω2 min = −0.75, i.e. gives the largest growth rate of gravitational instability, at km = 1. In Fig. 9, we plot the corresponding eigenfunctions only in the upper half of disc's full vertical extent. Because the mode has even parity, the vertical velocity and the derivative of the gravitational po- tential are odd functions and, correspondingly, the pressure and potential are even functions of z. Only the pressure per- turbation has one node in the interval 0 < z 6 h, other quan- tities have no nodes and vary over the whole vertical extent. This demonstrates that the spatial structure of the gravita- tionally most unstable mode is three-dimensional with non- zero vertical velocity. To see how self-gravity changes the form of the eigenfunctions, we also show the eigenfunctions of the same branch in the non-self-gravitating limit, which Axisymmetric modes in vertically stratified self-gravitating discs 13 u x p 60 40 20 0 −20 0 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 −0.5 0 0.04 0.02 0 u z ρ −0.02 0 0.5 z 0.5 z 1 1 0.5 z 0.5 z 1 1 Figure 10. Eigenfunctions of the even f-mode, which unlike the basic even r-mode is gravitationally stable, with the same values of parameters as in Fig. 9. The corresponding eigenfrequencies at km = 1 are ω2 = 1.1 for the self-gravitating case (solid lines) and ω2 = 1.6 for the non-self-gravitating case (dashed lines). Again, non-self-gravitating eigenfunctions have been scaled arbitrarily for plotting purposes. appear to be more concentrated towards the midplane than the self-gravitating ones and have no nodes in the same ver- tical range. Since the f-mode plays an important role in the angular momentum and energy transport in stratified discs (LO98), in Fig. 10 we also plot its eigenfunctions in the presence of self-gravity for the same parameters. Compar- ing Figs. 9 and 10, we clearly see that self-gravity modifies the form of the eigenfunctions of both the f- and r-modes. The perturbed quantities for both mode types vary with height somewhat similarly, especially the vertical velocities, which are, however, still at least an order of magnitude less than the horizontal ones, so that the motions can be viewed, to leading order, as 2D (see also Fig. 11). Thus, the gas mo- tion associated with the gravitationally unstable r-mode is of similar type to that of the f-mode, which, in turn, implies that the r-mode might be as important as the f-mode, i.e., might be able to do similar 'dynamical jobs' as the f-mode in self-gravitating discs. As mentioned earlier, the non-linear behaviour of the 3D perturbations in self-gravitating discs has been attributed solely to the f-mode dynamics without analysing other modes (Pickett et al. 2000; Boley & Durisen 2006). The have the quantities perturbed form f (z)exp(ikmx), f ≡ (ux, uz, p, ρ) and from this we can construct the spatial picture of the velocity, density and temperature perturbations for the gravitationally unstable basic even r-mode by taking the real parts. The temperature perturbation is found from the ideal gas equation of state and is equal to T = −c2 sρ/ρ0 + γp/ρ0 (here the pressure perturbation p is as used in the original equations 10-15, i.e., before switching to new variables). Figure 11 shows the density and temperature fields constructed in this way with velocity vectors showing the direction of gas motion superimposed on the density field, which in fact resembles the classical density profile of a 2D density wave. Near the midplane, matter flows (converges), almost parallel to the Figure 11. Distribution of the density (upper plot) and temper- ature (lower plot) perturbations in (x, z) plane constructed from the eigenfunctions of the gravitationally unstable basic even r- mode in Fig. 9. Superimposed on the density field are the velocity vectors of the induced gas flow. x−axis, towards high density regions. With increasing z, the flow becomes more arc-like, because of the variation of the vertical velocity with height. An analogous velocity field in the (x, z) plane was also observed in some non-linear simulations of self-gravitating discs (Boley & Durisen 2006; Boley et al. 2006), which suggests that the latter may be a result of the non-linear development of the type of motion we see here in the linear regime. We might also speculate that in relatively high-mass discs, the non-axisymmetric gravitationally unstable basic r-mode will produce similar high-density regions, which can be precursors of spiral shock fronts (if the disc does not fragment), and arc-like motions in the upper layers that can give rise to non-linear shock bores involving large distortions of the disc surface as described by Boley & Durisen (2006). The temperature perturbations are fairly non-uniform as well, varying both vertically and radially on comparable scales. Obviously, larger temperature perturbations correspond to overdense regions that are contracting because matter flows into them, and lower -- to underdense regions. 6 STABILITY CRITERIA IN 2D AND 3D In the 3D case, the degree and effect of self-gravity is charac- terized by Q3D = Ω2/4πGρm, where ρm is the value of equi- librium density at the midplane (see also GLB), which plays here a role similar to that of the standard 2D Toomre's pa- rameter Q2D = csΩ/πGΣ (Toomre 1964). However, in three- dimensional simulations, researchers often still tend to use the 2D Toomre's parameter to characterize the onset of grav- itational instability (Rice et al. 2003, 2005; Lodato & Rice 2004, 2005; Boley et al. 2006). In this section we investigate how a more general and exact 3D criterion of gravitational instability can be related to the 2D one. In general, these 14 G. R. Mamatsashvili and W. K. M. Rice 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2 1.5 1 0.5 Q 1 cr, 2D Q 2 cr, 2D Q cr, 3D 1 2 3 4 k J 2 k J 1 k m 1 2 3 4 5 s 5 s 6 7 8 9 10 6 7 8 9 10 Figure 12. Dependence of the critical Qcr,3D and the corre- sponding critical Q1 cr,2D and Q2 cr,2D on the polytropic index s. Shown also are the km at Qcr,3D and the 2D Jeans wavenum- bers kJ 1 = 1/Q1 cr,2D, kJ 2 = 1/Q2 cr,2D as a function of s. two parameters are different, because the 2D parameter con- tains the sound speed and surface density, which by defini- tion do not vary vertically for razor-thin discs, whereas the 3D parameter does not contain the sound speed and sur- face density, but the midplane value of the density. So, if we still want to characterize the 3D instability in terms of the 2D Toomre's parameter, we need to use some height- averaged, or effective sound speed (surface density can be uniquely calculated from the vertical density distribution). In some simulations the midplane values (Mej´ıa et al. 2005; Boley et al. 2006), while in others vertically averaged values (Rice et al. 2003, 2005) of the sound speed are used. Here we calculate the corresponding critical Qcr,2D for these cases. As is well-known, in razor-thin 2D discs, axisymmetric perturbations (density waves) are gravitationally unstable if Q2D < 1 (Toomre 1964). Let us now find the critical Qcr,3D that determines the gravitational instability in 3D, which, as found in this study, is associated with the basic branches of the even parity low-frequency modes. In Fig. 12, we show the critical Qcr,3D as a function of the polytropic index s. Given Qcr,3D, we can now find Q1 cr,2D defined in terms of the midplane sound speed and Q2 cr,2D defined in terms of the vertically averaged sound speed: Q1 cr,2D = , Q2 cr,2D = 2Qcr,3D 0 ρ0dz R h 0 csdz , 2Qcr,3DR h hR h 0 ρ0dz where ρ0 and cs, as before, are the normalized equilibrium density and sound speed the z-dependence of which, as well as the value of h, are determined by Qcr,3D and the poly- tropic index s. So, the critical Q1 cr,2D and Q2 cr,2D calcu- lated with the two different methods are different, though not far from each other, and less than unity which is their critical value in the 2D case. This again confirms the well- known result that 3D discs are more stable and to make them unstable smaller value of Q2D is necessary when com- pared with that required for razor-thin 2D discs (see also GLB). But in such cases, using Q3D seems more appropri- ate as it does not involve uncertainties in how to average the sound speed over height. In Fig. 12 we also examine the dependence of the crit- ical wavenumbers of the gravitational instability on s. We see that the 2D Jeans wavenumbers are always larger than the actual more exact wavenumber km at the onset of grav- itational instability when Q = Qcr,3D. Thus, in the 3D case, the critical wavenumbers depend differently on the thermodynamics than in the 2D case, where the critical kJ = 1/Q2D = 1 at the onset of instability. 7 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSIONS In this paper, we have analysed the axisymmetric nor- mal modes of perturbations in stratified, compressible, self- gravitating gaseous discs with subadiabatic, adiabatic and superadiabatic vertical stratifications. First, we performed a classification of perturbation modes in stratified discs in the absence of self-gravity to compare with previous calcu- lations. Four well-known main types of modes can be distin- guished: acoustic p-modes, surface gravity f-modes, buoy- ancy g-modes and inertial r-modes. The restoring forces for these modes for large radial wavenumbers are mainly provided by one the following: pressure/compressibility, dis- placements of the disc surface, buoyancy and inertial forces due to disc rotation for the p-,f-,g- and r-modes, respec- tively. For smaller wavenumbers, the restoring force for each mode is a combination of these forces. In the case of adi- abatic stratification, buoyancy is zero and, therefore, the g-mode disappears, while other modes remain qualitatively unchanged. For superadiabatic stratification, the g-mode be- comes convectively unstable and merges with the r-mode, so that only a single convectively unstable mode appears in the dispersion diagram at ω2 6 κ2, which we still call the g-mode. Due to the reflection symmetry of the equilibrium vertical structure with respect to the midplane, each mode comes in even and odd pairs. By our terminology, for even (odd) modes, pressure and gravitational potential pertur- bations are even (odd), while the perturbations of vertical velocity and derivative of potential are odd (even) functions of the vertical coordinate. After classifying and character- izing modes in the absence of self-gravity, we introduced self-gravity in the perturbation equations and investigated how it modifies the properties of these modes. We found that self-gravity, to some extent, reduces the frequencies of all normal modes at radial wavelengths comparable to the disc height, but its influence on the basic even r-mode, in the case of subadiabatic and adiabatic stratifications, and on the basic even g-mode, in the case of superadiabatic stratifi- cation, appears to be strongest. With decreasing Q3D, these modes become unstable due to self-gravity and thus deter- mine the gravitational instability of a vertically stratified disc. The basic even g-mode also exhibits convective insta- bility due to a negative entropy gradient but, unless the disc is strongly self-gravitating, these two instabilities grow con- currently in the linear regime, because their corresponding radial scales are separated. We also obtained the correspond- ing criterion for the onset of gravitational instability in 3D, which is more exact than the standard instability criterion in terms of the 2D Toomre's parameter, Q2D < 1, for axisym- metric density waves in razor-thin discs. By contrast, the Axisymmetric modes in vertically stratified self-gravitating discs 15 p-, f- and convectively stable g-modes have their ω2 reduced by self-gravity, but never become unstable for any value of Q3D. This is a consequence of the three-dimensionality of the disc. The eigenfunctions associated with the gravitationally unstable modes are intrinsically three-dimensional, that is, have non-zero vertical velocity and all perturbed quantities vary over the whole vertical extent of the disc. In this regard, we would like to mention that resolving the gravitationally most unstable mode in numerical simulations thus reduces to properly resolving the disc height (together with resolv- ing the corresponding radial scale, which, as shown here, appears somewhat larger than the disc height). So, the cri- terion of Nelson (2006) that at least ∼ 4 particle smoothing lengths should fit into per scale height may apply in three- dimensional SPH simulations. This implies a substantially larger number of SPH particles per vertical column because the disc itself may extend over many scale heights. He also shows that a similar criterion applies to grid-based simula- tions. Here for simplicity, and also to gain the first insight into the effects of self-gravity on the vertical modes in stratified discs, we considered only axisymmetric perturbations. Non- axisymmetric perturbations are dynamically richer, though more complicated, because the phenomena induced by Ke- plerian shear/differential rotation -- strong transient am- plification of perturbations and linear coupling of modes (not to be confused with non-linear mode-mode interac- tions) -- come into play for these type of perturbations. Tran- sient (swing) amplification of perturbations (density waves) has been studied previously in razor-thin 2D approximation (Goldreich & Lynden-Bell 1965b; Goldreich & Tremaine 1978; Toomre 1981; Mamatsashvili & Chagelishvili 2007). From the analysis presented here, we may expect that in the linear regime, the non-axisymmetric basic even r- mode can undergo larger transient amplification due to self- gravity than other modes in the disc. This transient am- plification of perturbations may be important for explain- ing the large burst phases seen in numerical simulations at the initial stages of the development of gravitational instability in discs (Rice et al. 2003, 2005; Lodato & Rice 2004, 2005; Boley et al. 2006). So, in this respect one should analyse and quantify the transient amplification of non- axisymmetric perturbations in stratified 3D self-gravitating discs starting with linear theory. As for the linear coupling of modes, it was demonstrated that in non-self-gravitating stratified discs, Keplerian shear causes rotational (vortex) mode perturbations to couple with and generate g-mode perturbations (Tevzadze et al. 2008). In the context of 2D discs, it was shown that vortex mode perturbations can also excite density waves due to shear (Bodo et al. 2005; Mamatsashvili & Chagelishvili 2007; Mamatsashvili & Rice 2009; Heinemann & Papaloizou 2009). In the 3D case, there are a larger number of modes in a disc and it is quite possible that some of them may appear linearly coupled due to shear and, therefore, be able to generate each other during evo- lution, especially the f-mode and the basic branch of the r- mode (because they vary on comparable vertical scales in the presence of self-gravity, Figs. 9, 10). Another related prob- lem also of interest is the interaction between self-gravity and the MRI in magnetized discs (see e.g., Fromang 2005). In particular, how self-gravity can modify the growth rates of magnetic normal modes responsible for the MRI. Actu- ally, this will be the generalization of the extensive analysis of normal modes in magnetized discs by Ogilvie (1998). showed that Lubow & Ogilvie (1998) in non-self- gravitating discs with polytropic vertical stratification, an external forcing preferentially excites the f-mode, because it has the largest responsiveness to an external driving com- pared to other modes. This mode, propagating through a disc, results in energy dissipation near the disc surface. Based on these results and partly on the properties of f- modes in stellar dynamics, Pickett et al. (2000) identified the behaviour of 3D perturbations in self-gravitating discs involving large surface distortions and the resulting energy dissipation in the upper layers, with f-mode dynamics. The self-stimulated potential was thought to play the role of an external/tidal force. However, it is not obvious that the ef- fect of a self-stimulated potential is the same as that of the external potential. In fact, our analysis has revealed that in self-gravitating discs, in addition to the f-mode, the r-mode can also be dynamically important, because this mode ap- pears to be subject to gravitational instability, while the f-mode is not. The eigenfunctions of the gravitationally un- stable basic even r-mode differ from those of the r-mode in non-self-gravitating discs in that they are no longer concen- trated near the midplane and behave somewhat similarly to the eigenfunctions of the f-mode: they vary over the whole vertical extent of the disc and also involve noticeable per- turbations of the disc surface. Consequently, like the f-mode, the gravitationally unstable r-mode can, in principle, also in- duce gas motion causing large surface distortions and resul- tant energy dissipation in the upper layers of the disc, which is thought to play a role in enhancing disc cooling (because the energy is deposited in the upper layers with small optical depth, it can be radiated away more quickly and effectively cool the disc, but this is a subject of further study, see e.g., Johnson & Gammie 2003; Boley et al. 2006). Furthermore, in the case of non-axisymmetric perturbations, as mentioned above, because of shear, the gravitationally unstable r-mode can couple with and generate the strong f-mode. So, the surface distortions may be caused by a combination of the f- and r-modes. In order to explore where dissipation can predominantly occur in a self-gravitating disc, one needs to generalize the analysis of Lin et al. (1990), LP, LO98, Bate et al. (2002) on the propagation of waves in stratified non-self-gravitating discs and consider the propagation of non-axisymmetric modes in stratified self-gravitating discs. The dispersion properties of modes in the presence of self- gravity as found here are one of the necessary things for studying mode propagation. Another point we want to raise concerns the spatial dis- tribution of temperature. In order to realistically model the cooling of protoplanetary discs, Boley et al. (2007) employed the radiative transfer technique. In the vertical z−direction, the radiative transfer equation was solved exactly assuming a plane-parallel atmosphere approximation, but in the ra- dial direction only the radiation diffusion approximation was employed. However, as our linear results (Fig. 11) and other non-linear simulations (e.g., Mej´ıa et al. 2005; Boley et al. 2006) demonstrate, temperature and, therefore, opacity may vary on comparable scales in both the radial and vertical di- rections and have very complex structure in the non-linear regime. This implies that a more general radiative transfer treatment based on solving the ray equation in all directions, 16 G. R. Mamatsashvili and W. K. M. Rice rather than using the diffusion approximation in either di- rection, would be more appropriate for better understanding cooling processes. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS G.R.M. would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (SUPA). We thank Gordon Ogilvie for helpful discussions and for criti- cally reading the manuscript. We also thank the referee for the constructive comments that improved the presentation of our results. REFERENCES Nelson A. F., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1039 Ogilvie G. I., 1998, MNRAS, 297, 291 Papaloizou J. C., Savonije G. J., 1991, MNRAS, 248, 353 Papaloizou J. C. B., Lin D. N. C., 1989, ApJ, 344, 645 Pickett B. K., Cassen P., Durisen R. H., Link R., 2000, ApJ, 529, 1034 Pickett B. K., Mej´ıa A. C., Durisen R. H., Cassen P. M., Berry D. K., Link R. P., 2003, ApJ, 590, 1060 Rafikov R. R., 2007, ApJ, 662, 642 Rice W. K. M., Armitage P. J., Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., 2003, MNRAS, 339, 1025 Rice W. K. M., Lodato G., Armitage P. J., 2005, MNRAS, 364, L56 Romeo A. B., 1992, MNRAS, 256, 307 Romeo A. B., 1994, A&A, 286, 799 Ruden S. P., Papaloizou J. C. B., Lin D. N. C., 1988, ApJ, 329, 739 Adams F. C., Ruden S. P., Shu F. H., 1989, ApJ, 347, 959 Bate M. R., Ogilvie G. I., Lubow S. H., Pringle J. E., 2002, MNRAS, 332, 575 Bertin G., Lin C. C., Lowe S. A., Thurstans R. P., 1989, Shu F., 1968, PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA Stamatellos D., Whitworth A. P., 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1563 Tevzadze A. G., Chagelishvili G. D., Zahn J., 2008, A&A, 478, 9 Toomre A., 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217 Toomre A., 1981, in S. M. Fall & D. Lynden-Bell ed., Struc- ture and Evolution of Normal Galaxies. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge ApJ, 338, 104 Binney J., Tremaine S., 1987, Galactic dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Bodo G., Chagelishvili G., Murante G., Tevzadze A., Rossi P., Ferrari A., 2005, A&A, 437, 9 Boley A. C., 2009, ApJ, 695, L53 Boley A. C., Durisen R. H., 2006, ApJ, 641, 534 Boley A. C., Durisen R. H., Nordlund A., Lord J., 2007, ApJ, 665, 1254 Boley A. C., Mej´ıa A. C., Durisen R. H., Cai K., Pickett M. K., D'Alessio P., 2006, ApJ, 651, 517 Boss A. P., 1998, ApJ, 503, 923 Boss A. P., 2003, ApJ, 599, 577 Boss A. P., 2004, ApJ, 610, 456 Fromang S., 2005, A&A, 441, 1 Gammie C. F., 2001, ApJ, 553, 174 Goldreich P., Lynden-Bell D., 1965a, MNRAS, 130, 97 Goldreich P., Lynden-Bell D., 1965b, MNRAS, 130, 125 Goldreich P., Tremaine S., 1978, ApJ, 222, 850 Heinemann T., Papaloizou J. C. B., 2009, MNRAS, 397, 52 Johnson B. M., Gammie C. F., 2003, ApJ, 597, 131 Korycansky D. G., Pringle J. E., 1995, MNRAS, 272, 618 Laughlin G., Bodenheimer P., 1994, ApJ, 436, 335 Laughlin G., Korchagin V., Adams F. C., 1997, ApJ, 477, 410 Lin D. N. C., Papaloizou J. C. B., Savonije G. J., 1990, ApJ, 364, 326 Lodato G., Rice W. K. M., 2004, MNRAS, 351, 630 Lodato G., Rice W. K. M., 2005, MNRAS, 358, 1489 Lubow S. H., Ogilvie G. I., 1998, ApJ, 504, 983 Lubow S. H., Pringle J. E., 1993a, MNRAS, 263, 701 Lubow S. H., Pringle J. E., 1993b, ApJ, 409, 360 Mamatsashvili G. R., Chagelishvili G. D., 2007, MNRAS, 381, 809 Mamatsashvili G. R., Rice W. K. M., 2009, MNRAS, 394, 2153 Mayer L., Lufkin G., Quinn T., Wadsley J., 2007, ApJ, 661, L77 Mej´ıa A. C., Durisen R. H., Pickett M. K., Cai K., 2005, ApJ, 619, 1098
1604.00859	1	1604	2016-04-04T13:53:03	High Contrast Imaging with Spitzer : Constraining the Frequency of Giant Planets out to 1000 AU separations	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We report results of a re-analysis of archival Spitzer IRAC direct imaging surveys encompassing a variety of nearby stars. Our sample is generated from the combined observations of 73 young stars (median age, distance, spectral type = 85 Myr, 23.3 pc, G5) and 48 known exoplanet host stars with unconstrained ages (median distance, spectral type = 22.6 pc, G5). While the small size of Spitzer provides a lower resolution than 8m-class AO-assisted ground based telescopes, which have been used for constraining the frequency of 0.5 - 13 $M_J$ planets at separations of $10 - 10^2$ AU, its exquisite infrared sensitivity provides the ability to place unmatched constraints on the planetary populations at wider separations. Here we apply sophisticated high-contrast techniques to our sample in order to remove the stellar PSF and open up sensitivity to planetary mass companions down to 5\arcsec\ separations. This enables sensitivity to 0.5 - 13 $M_J$ planets at physical separations on the order of $10^2 - 10^3$ AU , allowing us to probe a parameter space which has not previously been systematically explored to any similar degree of sensitivity. Based on a colour and proper motion analysis we do not record any planetary detections. Exploiting this enhanced survey sensitivity, employing Monte Carlo simulations with a Bayesian approach, and assuming a mass distribution of $dn/dm \propto m^{-1.31}$, we constrain (at 95% confidence) a population of 0.5 - 13 $M_J$ planets at separations of 100 - 1000 AU with an upper frequency limit of 9%.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	High Contrast Imaging with Spitzer : Constraining the Frequency of Giant Planets out to 1000 AU separations. Stephen Durkan1, Markus Janson2, Joseph C. Carson3 ABSTRACT We report results of a re-analysis of archival Spitzer IRAC direct imaging surveys encompassing a va- riety of nearby stars. Our sample is generated from the combined observations of 73 young stars (median age, distance, spectral type = 85 Myr, 23.3 pc, G5) and 48 known exoplanet host stars with unconstrained ages (median distance, spectral type = 22.6 pc, G5). While the small size of Spitzer provides a lower resolution than 8m-class AO-assisted ground based telescopes, which have been used for constraining the frequency of 0.5 - 13 MJ planets at separations of 10 − 102 AU, its exquisite infrared sensitivity provides the ability to place unmatched constraints on the planetary populations at wider separations. Here we apply sophisticated high-contrast techniques to our sample in order to remove the stellar PSF and open up sensitivity to planetary mass companions down to 5′′ separations. This enables sensitivity to 0.5 - 13 MJ planets at physical separations on the order of 102 − 103 AU , allowing us to probe a parameter space which has not previously been systematically explored to any similar degree of sensitivity. Based on a colour and proper motion analysis we do not record any planetary detections. Exploiting this enhanced survey sensitivity, employing Monte Carlo simulations with a Bayesian approach, and assuming a mass distribution of dn/dm ∝ m−1.31, we constrain (at 95% confidence) a population of 0.5 - 13 MJ planets at separations of 100 - 1000 AU with an upper frequency limit of 9%. Subject headings: planetary systems - techniques: image processing - infrared: planetary systems 1. Introduction The plethora of confirmed exoplanets to date is dominated by a population of planets within 5 -- 6 AU of their host star. This has been due to the success of large-scale radial-velocity (Butler et al. 1996; Vogt et al. 2000; Mayor et al. 2003) and tran- sit surveys (Pollacco et al. 2006; Baglin et al. 2009; Koch et al. 2010), which are biased to short separa- tion planets and whose typical duration limit their ability to detect periodicities on the order of 10's of years. Such surveys account for a combined detec- tion of ∼ 1900 planets (See http://exoplanet.eu and http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/), > 90% of 1Astrophysics Research Centre, of Mathemat- ics & Physics, Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK; [email protected] School 2Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424 , USA 1 the entire exoplanet population. This sample enables statistically significant trends to be uncovered between planetary / host star properties and planet frequency, which in turn allows for planet formation and evolu- tion theories to be stringently tested and constrained. However formation scenarios and evolutionary paths for wide giant planets with separations >> 5 -- 6 AU continue to prove challenging to constrain. This is due to a lack of systematic explorations by surveys with a sufficient degree of sensitivity and statistically robust population analyses. Direct imaging provides the most viable technique to probe for giant planets at such wide separations. Ex- tensive work has been carried out to expand the sam- ple of wide giant planets through detection in large- scale direct imaging surveys (Masciadri et al. 2005; Biller et al. 2007; Lafreni`ere et al. 2007b; Kasper et al. 2007; Chauvin et al. 2010; Leconte et al. 2010; Ehrenreich et al. 2010; Carson et al. 2011; Janson et al. 2011; Vigan et al. 2012; Delorme et al. 2012; Biller et al. 2013; Chauvin et al. 2015). Whilst these surveys typically record non- detections, several planetary mass wide companions have been found, indicating that although these types of planets may be rare (Nielsen & Close 2010), they do exist with some frequency throughout the galaxy. By subjecting these imaging surveys to statistical analysis, an upper limit on this frequency can be determined. Concurring frequency upper limits have been found for wide giant planets over a separation range on the order of 101 - 102 AU, corresponding to the parame- ter space at which observations are sensitive to Jupiter mass companions. These limits are shown in Table 1. Sensitivity is confined to this range due to instru- mental limitations. Imaging surveys typically favour the use of adaptive optics (AO) corrected instruments on 8m class ground based telescopes. The high angu- lar resolution afforded by such instruments provides sensitivity to planetary mass companions at small separations, down to the order of 10 AU, inside of which the required contrast becomes unachievable as one approaches the core of the near diffraction lim- ited point spread function (PSF). The outer sensitivity limit stems from anisoplanatism, where AO delivers poor wave front correction at increasing separation due to the different propagation paths and hence vary- ing wave front distortion experienced by off-axis light. This substandard correction results in a decrease in image quality and therefore a reduction in sensitivity at large separations. Typical values for the isoplanatic angle, where distortion is statistically uniform allow- ing for good AO correction, are 10′′ - 20′′ in the near infrared (NIR) (Sandler et al. 1994; Fritz et al. 2010), and thus imaging instruments are typically restricted to this field of view (FOV). This has severely limited sensitivity to planetary mass companions at separa- tions beyond the order of 102 AU, for typical nearby targets. Conducting imaging surveys from space based tele- scopes would negate this effect, however their small aperture diameters produce large diffraction limited PSF's, severely limiting their application for direct imaging of planets. Still, Marengo et al. (2006, 2009) have shown that the Spitzer space telescope is ca- pable of sensitivity to planetary mass companions at large angular separations, within the background noise limited regime, with their studies of ǫ Eri and Fo- mauhaut. Recent studies of Vega, Fomalhaut and ǫ Eri by Janson et al. (2012, 2015) have demonstrated that sensitivity to planetary mass companions is achievable with Spitzer within the PSF noise-limited regime, with the application of sophisticated high-contrast reduc- tion techniques. Therefore we implemented a sophisticated PSF subtraction technique to enhance the sensitivity of archival Spitzer imaging surveys, enabling sensitiv- ity to planetary mass companions over a separation on the order of 102 - 103 AU. This parameter space has not previously been systematically explored by sur- veys to a sufficient degree of sensitivity, leaving the population of giant planets at these separations poorly constrained. While the formation and origin of such wide orbit giants proves difficult to explain, their exis- tence has been confirmed with the detection of sev- eral planetary mass companions e.g. 1RXS J1609- 2105 b; 330 AU (Lafreni`ere et al. 2010), FW Tau b; 330 AU (Kraus et al. 2014a), HD106906 b; 650 AU (Bailey et al. 2014), GU Psc b; 2000 AU (Naud et al. 2014). Whilst core accretion and gravitational instabil- ity modes cannot readily explain the formation of such planets in situ (Ida & Lin 2004; Boss 2006; Rafikov 2007; Dodson-Robinson et al. 2009), and disk interac- tions cannot viably migrate planets out to ∼ 103 AU, beyond the typical confines of the disk (Isella et al. 2009), several theories have been developed in an at- tempt to account for planetary existence at these large orbital separations. One suggestion is that such a planetary system could be the result of dynamical capture of free- floating planets during dispersal of a stellar cluster. Simulations found this capable of producing planets at separations of > 50 AU (Parker & Quanz 2012) and 102 - 105 AU (Perets & Kouwenhoven 2012). As an alternative, planet-planet scattering, in which multiple planets gravitationally interact after disk dissipation, can result in dynamical scattering of a planet out to wide separations on the order of 100's of AU (Rasio & Ford 1996; Veras & Armitage 2004; Chatterjee et al. 2008; Juri´c & Tremaine 2008). Dy- namical simulations by Veras et al. (2009) show these interactions capable of scattering giant planets out to separations of 102 - 105 AU. However they find the population of planets that eventually end up in un- bound orbits passing through these wide separations to be larger than the population on stable orbits. The total population of wide giant planets then decreases on timescales of ∼ 10 Myr to produce a significantly depleted population at ages > 50 Myr where the ma- jority of planets have been ejected from the system. Constraining the population of giant planets at sep- arations of 102 - 103 AU is essential for assessing the 2 Table 1: Planet Frequency Upper Limits Planet Frequency Mass Range (MJ ) Separation Range (AU) Fractional Upper Limit Study 0.5 - 13.0 0.5 - 13.0 1.0 - 20.0 1.0 - 13.0 50 - 250 25 - 100 10 - 150 20 - 150 0.093 0.110 0.060 0.100 (Lafreni`ere et al. 2007b) (Lafreni`ere et al. 2007b) (Biller et al. 2013) (Chauvin et al. 2010) relevance of these theories, and allowing for stringent constraints to be placed on formation and evolution modes out to 1000's of AU. 2. Target Sample Our target list is compiled from archival Spitzer data based on proximity and youth. Such targets prove favourable to imaging searches for planetary compan- ions as young giant planets are intrinsically bright in the near infrared due to heat retention from forma- tion. This brightness decreases as the planet ages and the heat dissipates (Baraffe et al. 2003; Burrows et al. 2003; Fortney et al. 2008). Younger targets therefore provide imaging sensitivity to a greater range of com- panion masses for a given detection threshold, com- pared to relatively older stars, allowing for detection of lower mass planets. Stars within close proxim- ity to Earth provide sensitivity to companions over a greater range of physical separations for a given de- tection threshold at a specific angular separation, com- pared to a relatively distant target, allowing for detec- tion of shorter period planets for a given mass sensitiv- ity. This motivates our choice of stars from the archival Spitzer program 34 (P34) for enhanced imaging anal- ysis. This program targeted 73 nearby (< 30 pc), young stars and therefore provides an ideal basis for the sample of targets chosen here. Multiple age in- dicators including X-ray luminosity, chromospheric activity, Lithium abundance, rotation and photometric colour were originally used to select targets for P34 with ages below 120 Myr. We find these age estimates to be overly optimistic. Using a number of sources (e.g. Montes et al. 2001b; Zuckerman & Song 2004; Torres et al. 2008; Maldonado et al. 2010; Malo et al. 2013), we identify 55 of these targets to be members of young moving groups (YMGs) and place conservative age limits on the targets corresponding to reliable age estimates of YMGs taken from the literature; these age estimates are given in Table 2. We then place conser- vative age limits on the remaining targets combining literature age estimates encompassing several tech- niques (e.g. Barnes 2007; Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008; Plavchan et al. 2009; Tetzlaff et al. 2011; Vican 2012). The median target age is 85 Myr, although age limits range from 8 to 1050 Myr. The exception to this is HD 124498. Malo et al. (2013) identifies this target as a probable member of the β Pictoris YMG. However Chauvin et al. (2010) use several age dating techniques to reclassify HD 124498 as an older sys- tem with an age ≥ 100 Myr. We therefore place an age of 12 Myr - 10 Gyr on HD 124498 to ensure any statistics encompassing age estimations produce con- servative results. The median target distance, spectral type and H band magnitude are 23.3 pc, G5 and 5.289 respectively. We choose an additional archival Spitzer program to add to our target sample, program 48 (P48). This program targeted 48 nearby (< 35 pc) stars with known planetary companions, discovered via radial velocity. As such, these planets are on relatively short orbits, spanning a parameter space currently inacces- sible to direct imaging techniques. These exoplanet host stars are relatively old and no confident age limits can be found for the majority of the sample through- out the literature. For consistency, and to justify that any derived statistical result represents a conservative limit, we adopt a conservative age of 1 Gyr - 10 Gyr for all P48 stars. This age range spans the breadth of poorly constrained literature ages for the majority of the sample. The exceptions to this are HD 13507, HD 1237 and AF Hor, which are identified as members of YMGs with independent literature age estimates that support the association membership. Whilst these tar- gets may prove unfavourable to a deep imaging study, due to their extended ages, the strength in their addi- tion to the sample is that they provide an additional 48 references to aid in PSF reduction of the 73 P34 stars, contributing to an increase in achievable contrast and sensitivity to smaller mass companions. P48 was exe- cuted under the exact observational parameters as P34. 3 Table 2: Moving Group Age Estimates YMG Age Estimate (Myr) Age Reference Local Association (LA) β Pictoris Ursa Major Castor IC2391 Hyades Her-Lyr AB Dor Octans-Near Argus TW Hydrae Tuc-Hor/Columba/Carina 20 - 150 12 - 22 400 - 600 100 - 300 45 - 55 575 - 675 211- 303 70 - 120 30 - 100 30 - 50 8 - 12 20 - 40 (Montes et al. 2001b; Brandt et al. 2014) (Malo et al. 2013) (King et al. 2003) (Barrado y Navascues 1998; Montes et al. 2001b) (Stauffer et al. 1997) (Perryman et al. 1998) (Eisenbeiss et al. 2013) (Malo et al. 2013) (Zuckerman et al. 2013) (Malo et al. 2013) (Malo et al. 2013) (Malo et al. 2013) Along with P48 encompassing a similar spectral sam- ple of stars as P34, median spectral type and H band magnitude G5 and 4.957 respectively, this ensures P48 targets provide sufficient P34 PSF references. The me- dian distance of P48 stars is 22.6 pc. So whilst the age range of P48 stars limit sensitivity to low mass plan- ets, their proximity ensures sensitivity to larger mass planets over a wide range of separations. Therefore their inclusion our sample for reduction and analy- sis as well as providing additional references is jus- tified. However we note the potential bias introduced to any population constraint statistically derived from a deep imaging search encompassing a sample of stars hosting short period planets. If we consider planet- planet scattering to be a relevant mechanism for gi- ant planet production at 102 - 103 AU separations, the presence of a detected planet at a separation compara- ble to where a wide giant planet is expected to initially form, incorporates some degree of bias into our statis- tics that we cannot quantitatively evaluate. Therefore we do not correct for this possible bias. The combined target properties are given in Table 3. 3. Observations and Data Reduction The combined 121 targets were observed with the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC; Fazio et al. 2004) on the Spitzer Space telescope (Werner et al. 2004) under archival programs 34 and 48 between 2003 and 2004, during the cryogenic phase of the Spitzer mission. Im- ages were obtained simultaneously at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8 µm (channels 1 - 4 respectively). We choose Channel 2 as the primary channel to analyse based on evolution- ary model predictions that planetary mass companions are at their peak luminosity within the 4.5 µm band (Barrafe et al. 2003). Therefore this channel offers the best sensitivity for planet detection. We also anal- yse IRAC channel 1 images as a means to vet potential companions. All targets were observed with a 30s frame time allowing for an effective exposure time of 26.8s per dither position. Each observation was carried out with a five-position Gaussian dither pattern. The Spitzer Science Center (SSC) IRAC Pipeline (version S18.25.0) performed data reduction for all observa- tions, producing basic calibrated data (BCD) frames. This pipeline also produced corrected BCDs (CBCD) where saturated point sources have been fitted with un- saturated point sources by fitting an appropriate PSF that is matched to the unsaturated wings of the source. A final post basic calibrated data (PBCD) frame is then created by mosaicking the relevant CBCD frames at each dither position to produce a sub-pixelated im- age with a 0.6′′ per pixel resolution and a 5.2′ x 5.2′ FOV. Such saturation corrected images are unsuitable for a close companion search as pixels towards the PSF core may have been replaced with model pixel values, ensuring that any information about potential companion sources at these separations is lost. How- ever we favour the use of PBCD's over BCD's due to the additional artifact correction performed on the for- mer by the SSC IRAC pipeline. Therefore we generate a composite frame consisting of a PBCD image where saturation corrected regions, identified in the relevant mask files, have been replaced with pixel values gener- ated from mosaicking the relevant BCD frames. These pixel values have been sub-pixelated to the equivalent 0.6′′ per pixel resolution. Figure 1 shows an example 4 Fig. 1. -- Example of a composite PBCD / BCD 4.5 µm image of HD 217813, displaying the extent of the PSF and Spitzer spider features. The wide FOV reveals a multitude of point sources which must be vetted for planet candidacy. HD 217813 properties lie close to the median of the sample, H mag = 5.232, G5V star at 24.7pc. Fig. 2. -- Final reduced image of HD 217813 depicting the same FOV as Figure 1. The white box highlights the 2.01′ x 2.01′ PCA optimization region. Regular PSF subtraction of a mean stack image has been performed outside the optimisation region. 5 of such a composite PBCD / BCD image. 3.1. PSF Subtraction We calculate the centre of each target PSF by the fitting of a 2 dimensional Gaussian, the centre of each image is then shifted to this position. Each image is then normalised by the central brightness of the stellar PSF, estimated from the saturation corrected images. This provides an image stack of target PSF's that have similar normalised flux values. We then mask the satu- rated cores of each image for subsequent image reduc- tion. Each individual image is then robustly centred with respect to the stack by subtraction of a median stack image over a range of sub-pixel offsets. The off- set producing the minimum residuals is then used to align each image. The image stack constitutes the li- brary of PSF's used to construct a reference PSF for image subtraction. This accurate alignment of target PSF's then provides better performance of any refer- ence construction, ultimately leading to improved sen- sitivity in any final reduced image. Here we use Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to construct the optimal reference PSF to subtract from the target PSF. Variations of PCA such as PynPoint (Amara & Quanz 2012) and KLIP (Soummer et al. 2012) have the same underlying principle; a linear combination of orthogonal basis sets are used for ref- erence construction. These basis sets represent the de- composition of the reference library into its principal components. The linear coefficients are then gener- ated by the projection of the target onto each individ- ual basis. PCA performed here follows a KLIP-based analysis. We limit the PCA optimization to a 201 x 201 pixel sub-section of each 3.6 µm and 4.5 µm image, centred on the star. This corresponds to 2.01′ x 2.01′ FOV. This reduced area is chosen as a favourable trade off between algorithm efficiency and sensitivity to wide separations, with 2.01′ corresponding to separations on the order of 103 AU, at the typical target distance. PCA is performed on concentric annuli centred on the star. The radii of the annuli are chosen such that each annulus contains 1500 pixels. Reference annuli containing astronomical sources such as background stars, stellar companions or surviving bad pixels are excluded to prevent the algorithm from subtracting any true planetary PSF , and to prevent any fake planetary signal being injected into the final image. Since flux increases towards the PSF core, the larger flux val- ues towards the inner region of each annulus dominate the weighting of the orthogonal basis. This may pro- duce the lowest residuals but the outer annular regions will have experienced a substandard reduction. By per- forming PCA four times on each target and increasing the radius of the inner saturation mask, and therefore shifting the radii of the 1500 pixel annuli, we ensure that each section of the frame has been encompassed by an inner annular region and experienced a full qual- ity reduction. The final images to be analysed are then composites of these four separate PCA reduced frames whose constituent parts have experienced optimal re- duction. A final PCA reduced image can be seen in Figure 2. PCA reduction is typically performed at neighbour- ing states of the telescope / instrument system and provides optimal PSF subtraction when carried out in tandem with angular differential imaging application, where the PSF remains quasi-static over the observa- tion. Here we apply PCA to a sample observed at vary- ing states of the telescope / instrument system taken over the course of one year, e.g. varying stellar mag- nitude, spectral type, telescope roll angle. Therefore, our study constitutes a trial of PCA on an unfavourable data set, testing its effectiveness at the limits of its ap- plication. Similar conditions are required for optimal PSF subtraction using LOCI (Lafreni`ere et al. 2007a) and thus we favour PCA for its speed enhancement. 3.2. Image Sensitivity & Companion Identifica- tion We evaluate the sensitivity in the final PCA reduced images at 5σ detection limits by relating the standard deviation in concentric 1 pixel width annuli centred on the star, to the zero-point flux of Vega using the method of Marengo et al. (2009). This generates sen- sitivity values in units of Vega magnitudes. As any po- tential companion will suffer from partial flux subtrac- tion during the PCA reduction, we must account for the throughput of sources in the sensitivity estimation. We inject synthetic companions into each target im- age at position angles 0◦ and 90◦ so as to cover spider and non-spider regions, at five pixel intervals out to the edge of the optimisation region, and estimate through- put after PCA application. The mean throughput is then calculated at each separation and linearly interpo- lated to produce throughput values for each pixel sep- aration, consistent with sensitivity estimation in one- pixel width annuli. The mean throughput over the im- age stack is then used for sensitivity estimation. 6 Fig. 3. -- PCA sensitivity improvement with respect to conventional PSF subtraction, as a function of separation. The decrease in improvement around 20′′ corresponds to the transition between the PSF noise-limited regime and the background noise limited regime. The jagged nature of the curve stems from preferential reduction of inner annulus regions. 7 We evaluate the performance of the PCA reduction by computing sensitivity curves for both PCA opti- mized and conventional PSF subtracted images (i.e., subtraction of a mean stack image) and calculating the sensitivity improvement provided by PCA for each target. The median sensitivity improvement curve is then generated. This curve, displayed in Figure 3, shows that PCA offers superior image sensitivity at separations less than 20′′, within the PSF noise-limited regime, and provides a median improvement of ∼ 0.9 magnitudes at separations less than 10′′. This validates the application of PCA in a study encompassing a di- verse sample of stars, observed at varying states of the telescope / instrument system. The ∼ 0.9 magnitude improvement in the contrast limited regime demon- strates the relevance of applying and developing so- phisticated high-contrast techniques to archival Spitzer data, where we have enhanced sensitivity to planetary mass companions at relatively small angular separa- tions. This allows for the possibility of subsequent planet detection within a previously elusive parame- ter space and enabling more stringent constraints to be placed on the wide giant population. In the back- ground noise limited regime, separations greater than 20′′, PCA does not provide any sensitivity improve- ment over regular PSF subtraction. This is due to the random nature of background noise which PCA cannot reference. We use two initial criteria to identify potential plan- etary mass companions. Firstly each 4.5 µm reduced image is visually inspected to identify realistic PSF shapes, allowing real sources to be distinguished from potential surviving bad pixels. Any realistic PSF is then vetted for planetary candidacy by comparison of the 4.5 µm and 3.6 µm images. The spectral energy distribution of a non-irradiated 0.5 - 13 Jupiter mass companion, at the typical ages of our sample, is such that planetary flux at 3.6µm is typically > 1 magni- tude fainter than at 4.5 µm where peak emission oc- curs (Baraffe et al. 2003; Spiegel & Burrows 2012). In contrast to a background star, which is expected to be approximately equally bright in the 3.6 µm and 4.5 µm images, a planet detection recorded around the 5σ limit at 4.5 µm is not expected to be recovered to any reasonable significance at 3.6µm. This allows plane- tary sources to be distinguished from faint background stars without the need for a proper motion analysis. Therefore we look for source non-detection at 3.6 µm to confirm planet candidacy. 4. Results 4.1. Observational Sensitivities Figures 4 and 5 show the 4.5 µm median sensi- tivity curves for the P34 and P48 stars respectively. Within ∼ 20′′ sensitivity decreases towards the PSF core where the residual PSF noise exhibits the largest variance, limiting sensitivity to lower magnitude com- panions. Outside ∼ 20′′ PCA provides no sensitivity improvement and we are limited by background noise which tends to be constant, thus magnitude sensitivity at these separations is roughly constant. Figures 4 and 5 also map sensitivity as a function of projected physi- cal separation out to ∼ 1400 AU at the median distance of P34 and P48 stars, 23.3 pc and 22.6 pc respectively. P34 and P48 stars provide comparative magnitude sen- sitivity limits. These magnitude sensitivity limits can be translated into mass sensitivities using mass-luminosity evolu- tionary models. One caveat is the discrepancy be- tween hot- (Chabrier et al. 2000; Baraffe et al. 2003; Burrows et al. 2003) and cold-start (Marley et al. 2007; Fortney et al. 2008) models, where the later predict much fainter planets at young ages. Here we will consider hot-start models which are consis- tent with existing observational data (Janson et al. 2011). However it can be noted that the models converge on the order of 10's of Myrs for low mass planetary companions (≤ 2MJ) and on the order of 100's of Myr for higher mass planetary companions (Spiegel & Burrows 2012). Thus our choice of model will not lead to significant disparity in mass sensi- tivity over the complete sample at the typical ages considered. COND-based models (Allard et al. 2001; Baraffe et al. 2003), applicable for companion temper- atures below 1700K, which is a relevant temperature range for 0.5 - 13 MJ companions at the sample ages, are used here. The corresponding mass sensitivities for the median P34 and P48 magnitude sensitivities are shown in Fig- ures 4 and 5. With P34 targets, sensitivity down to ≤ 2MJ companions is achieved down to ∼5′′, cor- responding to ∼ 100 AU projected separation, whilst sensitivity down to 0.5 MJ companions is achieved for separations & 15′′ (& 350 AU). Whilst P34 and P48 stars provide comparative magnitude sensitivity lim- its, the extended ages of P48 stars ensure an equivalent low mass sensitivity cannot be achieved. Sensitivity to below 4 MJ is typically not acquired, and sensitivity to 5 MJ planets is limited to outside 20′′ (∼ 500 AU). 8 Fig. 4. -- Median survey detection limits for P34 stars. Magnitude sensitivity is given as a function of angular separation. Right axis shows corresponding minimum detectable mass at median target age of 85 Myr. Top axis displays projected physical separation at median target distance 23.3 pc. Fig. 5. -- Median survey detection limits for P48 stars. Right axis shows corresponding minimum detectable mass at median target age of 5.5 Gyr. Top axis displays projected physical separation at median target distance 22.6 pc. 9 Taking 13 MJ as the upper mass limit for planetary objects, we are typically not sensitive to planets within 10′′ (∼ 200 AU) for these targets. 4.2. Candidate Companion Detection Through comparison of 3.6 µm and 4.5 µm im- ages we initially identify 36 candidates with realis- tic planetary mass colour. Figure 6 shows a typical candidate identification through a 4.5 µm source non- detection at 3.6 µm. These candidates are further vet- ted with a common proper motion analysis using a 2nd epoch combining archival Spitzer data and observa- tions carried out during Spitzer Cycle 11 under pro- gram 11102, repeating the original observations for several candidate host stars under the same observa- tional parameters, with subsequent equivalent reduc- tion. The target sample has a median total proper motion of 206 mas/yr, and over a baseline of 4 - 11 years provided by the 2nd epoch data, we can con- fidently identify co-moving planetary companions in an image with a 0.6′′ /pixel scaling. Four candidates recovered in a 2nd epoch are revealed to be non co- moving with the target star. Such sources are most likely rare background galaxies with unusual infrared colors, such as NGC 1377 which is brighter at 4.5 µm than 3.6 µm (Dale et al. 2005). Non-detection of the remaining sources and inspection of the raw CBCD frames leads to their identification as bad pixels sur- viving the Spitzer Science Center IRAC Pipeline re- duction. Therefore this survey records a null planet detection result. 5. Statistical Analysis As in previous direct imaging surveys we exploit this null detection and the magnitude detection limits generated for each target to place constraints on the wide giant population through a coupling of Monte Carlo simulations and Bayesian analysis. Effectively the Bayesian analysis determines the population of wide giants, as an upper fractional limit of stars that harbour such a companion, that is consistent with the derived planet detection probability and the null sur- vey result. We formulate our statistical analysis in the same fashion as previous works based on Carson et al. (2006) and Lafreni`ere et al. (2007b). The relevance of this work is that with improved sensitivity in the PSF-noise limited regime, due to PCA application to archival Spitzer data, and the wide FOV providing background noise limited sensitivity, we have opened sensitivity to planetary mass companions over separa- tions on the order of 102 - 103 AU. This has been done for both young, P34, and relatively old, P48, stars, as seen in Figures 4 and 5. With this enhanced sensitivity, we can significantly constrain the population of wide giants out to 1000 AU. 5.1. Detection Probabilities To derive the planet detection probability for each target we simulate 10,000 planets, using a Monte Carlo approach to randomly sample planet mass, separa- tion, orbital projection and age. Planet mass is sam- pled between 0.5 - 13 MJ , however the lack of con- straints on the planet population over the parameter space explored here has ensured any constraints on mass distribution are correspondingly lacking. There- fore we assume a mass distribution of dn/dm ∝ mα where α = −1.31, extrapolated from statistical anal- ysis of radial velocity studies (Cumming et al. 2008). In any case Chauvin et al. (2010) find the choice of semi-major axis power law index to dominate the derived detection probabilities in comparison to any variation in α. We choose to sample semi-major axis from a linear distribution between 100 - 1000 AU. Studies (Nielsen et al. 2008; Nielsen & Close 2010; Chauvin et al. 2010) have found semi-major axis power laws reported by Cumming et al. (2008) to be invalid at the separations considered here, mo- tivating our choice of a linear distribution. We then sample orbital projection factor using the method of Brandeker et al. (2006) which accounts for orbital phases, orientations and an eccentricity distribution of f (e) = 2e (predicted and observed for long period binaries; Duquennoy & Mayor 1991), allowing true physical separations to be translated to projected phys- ical separations. Projected separations are then con- verted to angular separations using the known stellar distance. Here we do not sample over any uncertainty in stellar distance as the revised Hipparcos measure- ments have good precision and thus the uncertainty in stellar age completely dominates the uncertainty in detection probabilities. Age is sampled between limits of reliable estimates from the literature, or between 1 and 10 Gyr for the majority of P48 targets with ages that are not well constrained. These ages are given in Table 3. Applying COND-based evolutionary mod- els and adopting sampled planetary properties, we can translate mass into magnitude and map each planet onto 5σ magnitude sensitivity curves. The fraction of planets that lie above the detection limit provides 10 Fig. 6. -- PCA reduced 3.6 µm, left, and 4.5 µm, right, images of HD 197890. Majority of point sources revealed appear at both wavelengths and therefore are likely background stars. Sources highlighted in green circles however only appear at 4.5 µm and are identified as potential planetary candidates. After further analysis these apparent sources were revealed to be surviving outlier pixel values. the detection probability for each target. Mean Detec- tion probabilities for P34 and P48 stars for mass range [0.5, 13] MJ and the separation range [100, 1000] AU are 0.42 and 0.08 respectively. We additionally choose to perform simulations over varying mass and separation ranges in order to con- strain the wide giant population as a function of mass and separation. Mass range will be varied between [0.5, mmax] MJ with mmax ranging from 1.0 - 13.0 MJ in increments of 0.5 MJ . Separation range will be varied between [amin, amax] with amin = 75, 100, 125 AU, and amax increasing in increments of 25 AU out to 1000 AU. Mean detection probabilities over the entire sample, as a function of upper mass and outer separation limit, are given in Figure 7. Mean detec- tion probabilities over P34 targets are typically much greater than the mean over the entire sample due to the superior mass sensitivity of P34 targets corresponding to their relatively young ages. However we find the in- clusion of P48 targets provides a favourable trade off between low probability detection and increased sam- ple size which leads to better statistical constraints on the wide giant population. 5.2. Binary Bias We identify 43 targets in our sample as binary stars in the Washington double star catalogue (Mason et al. 2001) that have been vetted for true companionship through a proper motion analysis. The inclusion of these binaries, > 1/3 of the sample, may introduce a bias in astrophysical interpretation which we attempt to account for. We recored a null planet detection in these binary systems, which is the basis of our sta- tistical formalism. However the binary companion will have introduced a parameter space of instabil- ity in which we would not expect a planet to orbit around its host star. To deal with this and remove the bias from our analysis we use the stability criteria of Holman & Wiegert (1999) to determine the instability regions, for both S- and P-type systems. Many of the binary orbits and companion masses are not well doc- umented, so for algorithm simplicity, consistency and to ensure conservative results, we take the worse-case scenario of an equal mass binary system, which intro- duces the greatest range of instability. We also assume the latest epoch separation in the Washington double star catalogue to be the true physical separation. This is a reasonable assumption as for a random distribu- 11 Fig. 7. -- Mean planet detection probabilities over P34 and P48 targets as a function of semi-major axis and mass. X axis denotes outer limit amax over which planet separation is sampled with constant amin = 100 AU. Curves are labelled with upper mass limit mmax over which planet mass is sampled in units of MJ , with constant mmin = 0.5MJ. 12 tion of binary eccentricities, phases and orientations the most likely true physical separation is given by the projected separation (Brandeker et al. 2006). We ensure these instability regions are counted as a non- detectable range. We note that the true frequency of wide giant planets around binary stars may be differ- ent than that around single stars. This potential fre- quency discrepancy is possibly due to the influence that a binary companion will have on the planet for- mation process. Whilst studies have found that bina- rity has a minimal effect on overall planet frequency (Bonavita & Desidera 2007; Bergfors et al. 2013), it has been suggested that binary companions with sep- arations . 100 AU may result in a decrease in the number of planets formed through enhanced dynami- cal heating of the protoplanetary disk (Thalmann et al. 2014). Whilst binary companions with separations . 100 AU only account for 12 of the 43 binaries in our sample, an element of bias will be inherent in the statistical result derived from a combined single and binary star sample. 5.3. Estimation of Planet Frequency With the determination of target detection probabil- ities an upper limit on the frequency of planets hosting wide giants can be derived through the Bayesian ap- proximation; fmax ≈ −ln(1 − α)/N hpj i (1) Where hpji is the mean detection probability over N targets and α is credibility level of the derived result which we choose to be 95%. We derive an upper limit on the frequency of planets in the mass range [0.5, 13] MJ and the semi-major axis range [100, 1000] AU to be 9%. As no previous survey has probed this param- eter space to a similar degree of sensitivity there is no literature comparison to our result. However our low frequency findings certainly support the extension of previous survey findings of low frequency at sep- arations on the on the order or 10 - 100 AU (see Ta- ble 1), out to 1000 AU separations, and is in general agreement with the theory of Veras et al. (2009), pre- dicting a low frequency population of 102 − 105 AU planets at ages > 50 Gyr. Figure 8 shows planet fre- quency limits as a function of mass over constant sep- aration range 100 - 1000 AU. Figure 9 shows planet frequency as a function of separation with amin = 75, 100 and 125 AU over constant mass range 0.5 - 13 MJ . Whilst this study well constrains the population 13 of 100 - 1000 AU planets with masses ranging from 0.5 - 13 MJ , the planet frequency upper limit increases to- wards smaller mass and separation limits. This is a de- terioration of the population constraint due to bias in- herent in the detection technique, where imaging sen- sitivity, and therefore detection probability, decreases with decreasing mass and separation. However, planet frequency tends to be a smoothly varying function with respect to mass and separation, and Figure 9 shows that at separations & 700 AU frequency values tend to be approximately constant, corresponding to the back- ground noise limited regime with approximately con- stant sensitivity. Thus there is no reason to expect that our choice of [0.5, 13] MJ and [100, 1000] AU bound- aries are arbitrarily optimistic with regard to reason- ably lower mass and separation limits. 6. Conclusions In this paper we have presented the results of a re- analysis of two archival Spitzer imaging surveys en- compassing 121 targets with varying spectral types and ages. Previously, the large PSF associated with the 0.85m Spitzer telescope diameter has severely limited its capability for directly imaging exoplanets. With the application of PCA we have removed the stel- lar PSF and opened up sensitivity to planetary mass companions over a broad range of separations. PCA has provided up to a magnitude sensitivity improve- ment at small separations with respect to conventional PSF subtraction methods, highlighting the strength of the technique, even on a relatively unfavourable data set. Using theoretical mass-luminosity evolutionary models we have shown that we are sensitive to plan- etary mass companions down to 0.5 MJ at separa- tions on the order of 102 − 103 AU. This parameter space has not previously been systematically explored by imaging surveys to any comparable degree of sen- sitivity due to anisoplanatism and FOV limitations of ground based surveys, and PSF contrast limitations of space based surveys. Therefore through the coupling of Monte Carlo simulations and a Bayesian analysis, for the first time we have constrained the population of 0.5 - 13 MJ , 100 - 1000 AU planets, producing an upper frequency limit of 9%. This is an extension of findings of low companion frequencies in numerous previous surveys at separations on the order of 10−102 AU. Constraining this very wide giant planet popula- tion allows for previously untested formation and evo- lutionary theories to be adapted and constrained. Fig. 8. -- Planet frequency upper limit (at the 95% confidence level) as a function of mass. X axis denotes upper mass limit mmax with constant mmin = 0.5MJ. Separation range is constant, 100 - 1000 AU. Fig. 9. -- Planet frequency upper limit (at the 95% confidence level) as a function of separation. X axis denotes outer separation limit amax with constant amin = 75, 100, 125 AU. Mass range is constant, 0.5 - 13 MJ . 14 S.D. acknowledges support from the Queen's Uni- versity Belfast Department for Education and Learn- ing (DEL) university scholarship. M.J. gratefully ac- knowledges funding from the Knut and Alice Wallen- berg Foundation. J.C. receives support from the Re- search Corporation for Science Advancement (Award No. 21026) and the South Carolina Space Grant Con- sortium. This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Tech- nology under a contract with NASA. This study made use of the CDS services SIMBAD and VizieR, as well as the SAO/NASA ADS service. REFERENCES Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R., Tamanai, A., & Schweitzer, A. 2001, ApJ, 556, 357, 357 Amara, A., & Quanz, S. P. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 948, 948 Baglin, A., Auvergne, M., Barge, P., et al. 2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 253, IAU Symposium, ed. F. Pont, D. Sasselov, & M. J. Holman, 71 -- 81 Bailey, V., Meshkat, T., Reiter, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, L4, L4 Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Barman, T. S., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2003, A&A, 402, 701, 701 Barnes, S. A. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1167, 1167 Barrado y Navascues, D. 1998, A&A, 339, 831, 831 Brandt, T. D., Kuzuhara, M., McElwain, M. W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 1, 1 Bubenicek, J., Palous, J., & Piskunov, A. E. 1985, So- viet Ast., 29, 625, 625 Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., & Lunine, J. I. 2003, ApJ, 596, 587, 587 Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Williams, E., et al. 1996, PASP, 108, 500, 500 Carson, J. C., Eikenberry, S. S., Smith, J. J., & Cordes, J. M. 2006, AJ, 132, 1146, 1146 Carson, J. C., Marengo, M., Patten, B. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 141, 141 Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. 2000, ApJ, 542, 464, 464 Chatterjee, S., Ford, E. B., Matsumura, S., & Rasio, F. A. 2008, ApJ, 686, 580, 580 Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M., Bonavita, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 509, A52, A52 Chauvin, G., Vigan, A., Bonnefoy, M., et al. 2015, A&A, 573, A127, A127 Cumming, A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2008, PASP, 120, 531, 531 Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2246, 0, 0 Dale, D. A., Bendo, G. J., Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 857, 857 Bergfors, C., Brandner, W., Daemgen, S., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 182, 182 Delorme, P., Lagrange, A. M., Chauvin, G., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A72, A72 Biller, B. A., Close, L. M., Masciadri, E., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 143, 143 Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Veras, D., Ford, E. B., & Be- ichman, C. A. 2009, ApJ, 707, 79, 79 Biller, B. A., Liu, M. C., Wahhaj, Z., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 160, 160 Bonavita, M., & Desidera, S. 2007, A&A, 468, 721, 721 Boss, A. P. 2006, ApJ, 637, L137, L137 Brandeker, A., Jayawardhana, R., Khavari, P., Haisch, Jr., K. E., & Mardones, D. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1572, 1572 Dupuy, T. J., Liu, M. C., & Ireland, M. J. 2009, ApJ, 692, 729, 729 Duquennoy, A., & Mayor, M. 1991, A&A, 248, 485, 485 Ehrenreich, D., Lagrange, A.-M., Montagnier, G., et al. 2010, A&A, 523, A73, A73 Eisenbeiss, T., Ammler-von Eiff, M., Roell, T., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A53, A53 15 Fazio, G. G., Hora, J. L., Allen, L. E., et al. 2004, Kraus, A. L., Shkolnik, E. L., Allers, K. N., & Liu, ApJS, 154, 10, 10 M. C. 2014b, AJ, 147, 146, 146 Fekel, F. C., Bopp, B. W., Africano, J. L., et al. 1986, Lafreni`ere, D., Jayawardhana, R., & van Kerkwijk, AJ, 92, 1150, 1150 M. H. 2010, ApJ, 719, 497, 497 Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., & Lodders, K. 2008, ApJ, 683, 1104, 1104 Lafreni`ere, D., Marois, C., Doyon, R., Nadeau, D., & Artigau, ´E. 2007a, ApJ, 660, 770, 770 Fritz, T., Gillessen, S., Trippe, S., et al. 2010, MN- Lafreni`ere, D., Doyon, R., Marois, C., et al. 2007b, RAS, 401, 1177, 1177 ApJ, 670, 1367, 1367 Fuhrmann, K. 2004, Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, Leconte, J., Soummer, R., Hinkley, S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 3, 3 -- . 2008, MNRAS, 384, 173, 173 Gaidos, E. J., Henry, G. W., & Henry, S. M. 2000, AJ, 120, 1006, 1006 Gliese, W., & Jahreiss, H. 1991, NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A, 92, 33932, 33932 Holman, M. J., & Wiegert, P. A. 1999, AJ, 117, 621, 621 Ida, S., & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ, 604, 388, 388 Isella, A., Carpenter, J. M., & Sargent, A. I. 2009, ApJ, 701, 260, 260 Janson, M., Bonavita, M., Klahr, H., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 89, 89 Janson, M., Carson, J. C., Lafreni`ere, D., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 116, 116 Janson, M., Quanz, S. P., Carson, J. C., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A120, A120 Jeffries, R. D., James, D. J., & Bromage, G. E. 1994, MNRAS, 271, 476, 476 Juri´c, M., & Tremaine, S. 2008, ApJ, 686, 603, 603 Kasper, M., Apai, D., Janson, M., & Brandner, W. 2007, A&A, 472, 321, 321 King, J. R., Villarreal, A. R., Soderblom, D. R., Gul- liver, A. F., & Adelman, S. J. 2003, AJ, 125, 1980, 1980 Koch, D. G., Borucki, W. J., Basri, G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L79, L79 716, 1551, 1551 L´opez-Santiago, J., Montes, D., Crespo-Chac´on, I., & Fern´andez-Figueroa, M. J. 2006, ApJ, 643, 1160, 1160 Makarov, V. V., Zacharias, N., & Hennessy, G. S. 2008, ApJ, 687, 566, 566 Makarov, V. V., Zacharias, N., Hennessy, G. S., Harris, H. C., & Monet, A. K. B. 2007, ApJ, 668, L155, L155 Maldonado, J., Mart´ınez-Arn´aiz, R. M., Eiroa, C., Montes, D., & Montesinos, B. 2010, A&A, 521, A12, A12 Malo, L., Doyon, R., Lafreni`ere, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 762, 88, 88 Mamajek, E. E., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2008, ApJ, 687, 1264, 1264 Marengo, M., Megeath, S. T., Fazio, G. G., et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, 1437, 1437 Marengo, M., Stapelfeldt, K., Werner, M. W., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1647, 1647 Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Boden- heimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541, 541 Masciadri, E., Mundt, R., Henning, T., Alvarez, C., & Barrado y Navascu´es, D. 2005, ApJ, 625, 1004, 1004 Mason, B. D., Wycoff, G. L., Hartkopf, W. I., Dou- glass, G. G., & Worley, C. E. 2001, AJ, 122, 3466, 3466 Kraus, A. L., Ireland, M. J., Cieza, L. A., et al. 2014a, Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., et al. 2003, The Mes- ApJ, 781, 20, 20 senger, 114, 20, 20 16 Montes, D., L´opez-Santiago, J., Fern´andez-Figueroa, M. J., & G´alvez, M. C. 2001a, A&A, 379, 976, 976 Tabernero, H. M., Montes, D., & Gonz´alez Hern´andez, J. I. 2012, A&A, 547, A13, A13 Montes, D., L´opez-Santiago, J., G´alvez, M. C., et al. Tetzlaff, N., Neuhauser, R., & Hohle, M. M. 2011, 2001b, MNRAS, 328, 45, 45 MNRAS, 410, 190, 190 Nakajima, T., & Morino, J.-I. 2012, AJ, 143, 2, 2 Naud, M.-E., Artigau, ´E., Malo, L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 787, 5, 5 Nielsen, E. L., & Close, L. M. 2010, ApJ, 717, 878, 878 Nielsen, E. L., Close, L. M., Biller, B. A., Masciadri, E., & Lenzen, R. 2008, ApJ, 674, 466, 466 Thalmann, C., Desidera, S., Bonavita, M., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, A91, A91 Torres, C. A. O., Quast, G. R., Melo, C. H. F., & Sterzik, M. F. 2008, Young Nearby Loose Associa- tions, ed. B. Reipurth, 757 van Leeuwen, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 653, 653 Veras, D., & Armitage, P. J. 2004, MNRAS, 347, 613, Parker, R. J., & Quanz, S. P. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 613 2448, 2448 Veras, D., Crepp, J. R., & Ford, E. B. 2009, ApJ, 696, Perets, H. B., & Kouwenhoven, M. B. N. 2012, ApJ, 1600, 1600 750, 83, 83 Perryman, M. A. C., Brown, A. G. A., Lebreton, Y., et al. 1998, A&A, 331, 81, 81 Plavchan, P., Werner, M. W., Chen, C. H., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1068, 1068 Pollacco, D. L., Skillen, I., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2006, PASP, 118, 1407, 1407 Rafikov, R. R. 2007, ApJ, 662, 642, 642 Vican, L. 2012, AJ, 143, 135, 135 Vigan, A., Patience, J., Marois, C., et al. 2012, A&A, 544, A9, A9 Vogt, S. S., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., & Apps, K. 2000, ApJ, 536, 902, 902 Werner, M. W., Roellig, T. L., Low, F. J., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1, 1 Wollert, M., Brandner, W., Reffert, S., et al. 2014, Rasio, F. A., & Ford, E. B. 1996, Science, 274, 954, A&A, 564, A10, A10 954 Zuckerman, B., Bessell, M. S., Song, I., & Kim, S. Riaz, B., Gizis, J. E., & Harvin, J. 2006, AJ, 132, 866, 2006, ApJ, 649, L115, L115 866 Zuckerman, B., Rhee, J. H., Song, I., & Bessell, M. S. Riedel, A. R., Finch, C. T., Henry, T. J., et al. 2014, 2011, ApJ, 732, 61, 61 AJ, 147, 85, 85 Sandler, D. G., Stahl, S., Angel, J. R. P., Lloyd-Hart, M., & McCarthy, D. 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11, 925, 925 Schlieder, J. E., L´epine, S., & Simon, M. 2012, AJ, 143, 80, 80 Soummer, R., Pueyo, L., & Larkin, J. 2012, ApJ, 755, L28, L28 Spiegel, D. S., & Burrows, A. 2012, ApJ, 745, 174, 174 Zuckerman, B., & Song, I. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 685, 685 Zuckerman, B., Song, I., & Bessell, M. S. 2004, ApJ, 613, L65, L65 Zuckerman, B., Song, I., Bessell, M. S., & Webb, R. A. 2001, ApJ, 562, L87, L87 Zuckerman, B., Vican, L., Song, I., & Schneider, A. 2013, ApJ, 778, 5, 5 Stauffer, J. R., Hartmann, L. W., Prosser, C. F., et al. 1997, ApJ, 479, 776, 776 This 2-column preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. 17 TABLE 3 TARGET SAMPLE PROPERTIES HD 48189 113449 102647 174429 196982 197481 181296 216803 13507 217107 206860 35296 41700 173880 1237 17051 40979 75732 120136 179949 1835 222143 108799 30495 128987 19994 27045 197157 166 17925 197890 10008 77407 171488 130322 217014 92945 HIP Other RA DEC H Mag Spectral Type Distance (pc) YMG Age (Myr) YMG / Age Reference Binarity 31711 106231 63742 57632 23200 92680 102141 102409 95261 108706 113283 114252 10321 113421 107350 25278 28764 92161 1292 12653 28767 43587 67275 94645 1803 116613 60994 22263 71743 14954 117410 19990 102333 544 13402 37766 102626 7576 44458 91043 72339 113357 52462 LO Peg GJ 182 GJ 4247 GJ 890 GJ 9839 GJ 285 EY Dra V383 Lac 06 38 00.366 21 31 01.713 13 03 49.655 11 49 03.578 04 59 34.831 18 53 05.875 20 41 51.159 20 45 09.531 19 22 51.206 22 01 13.125 22 56 24.053 23 08 19.550 02 12 55.005 22 58 15.541 21 44 31.329 05 24 25.464 06 04 28.440 18 47 01.274 00 16 12.678 02 42 33.466 06 04 29.942 08 52 35.811 13 47 15.743 19 15 33.230 00 22 51.788 23 37 58.488 12 30 04.774 04 47 36.291 14 40 31.106 03 12 46.437 23 48 25.691 04 17 15.662 20 44 02.334 00 06 36.785 02 52 32.128 07 44 40.174 18 16 16.776 20 47 45.007 01 37 35.466 09 03 27.083 18 34 20.103 22 20 07.0258 14 47 32.727 22 57 27.980 10 43 28.272 -61 32 00.19 +23 20 07.37 -05 09 42.52 +14 34 19.41 +01 47 00.68 -50 10 49.88 -32 26 06.83 -31 20 27.24 -54 25 26.15 +28 18 24.87 -31 33 56.04 -15 24 35.80 +40 40 06.02 -02 23 43.38 +14 46 18.98 +17 23 00.72 -45 02 11.77 +18 10 53.47 -79 51 04.24 -50 48 01.06 +44 15 37.59 +28 19 50.95 +17 27 24.86 -24 10 45.67 -12 12 33.97 +46 11 57.96 -13 23 35.46 -16 56 04.04 -16 12 33.44 -01 11 45.96 -12 59 14.86 +20 34 42.93 -51 55 15.50 +29 01 17.40 -12 46 10.97 +03 33 08.84 +54 10 21.62 -36 35 40.79 -06 45 37.53 +37 50 27.53 +18 41 24.23 +49 30 11.763 -00 16 53.32 +20 46 07.79 -29 03 51.43 4.747 6.524 5.674 1.925 6.450 6.486 5.201 4.831 5.148 7.035 3.804 7.301 5.649 4.765 4.598 4.029 5.149 4.447 4.990 4.323 5.509 4.265 3.546 5.101 5.035 5.123 4.932 4.116 5.629 3.768 6.485 4.577 3.692 4.629 4.230 6.005 7.960 6.930 5.899 5.534 5.896 6.577 6.315 4.234 5.770 G1/G2V K8 G5V A3Vvar M0Ve K0Vp M4Ve M1Ve A0Vn M4V K4V M0Ve G5V G8IV G0V F8V G0IV-V A5III G6V G3IV F8 G8V F7V F8V G3V G3/4V G1/G2V G3V G6V F8V K5Vke A3m A9IV K0V K1V M4.5Ve dM1.5e K0V G5V G0V G0V K1V K0V G5V K1V 21.3 24.8 21.7 11.0 25.9 51.5 10.7 9.9 48.2 8.9 7.6 22.3 26.9 19.9 17.9 14.4 26.6 28.9 17.5 17.2 33.1 12.3 15.6 27.6 20.9 23.3 24.7 13.3 23.7 22.6 28.2 28.9 24.2 13.7 10.4 6.00 30.0a 52.2 24.0 30.5 38.0 27.5b 31.7 15.6 21.4 AB Dor AB Dor AB Dor Argus β Pictoris β Pictoris β Pictoris β Pictoris β Pictoris Castor Castor Castor Castor Her-Lyr Hyades Hyades Hyades Hyades Hyades IC2391 IC2391 IC2391 Carina Octans-Near Octans-Near Her-Lyr LA LA LA Tuc-Hor LA LA LA LA LA 70 - 120 70 - 120 70 - 120 30 - 50 12 - 22 12 - 22 12 - 22 12 - 22 12 - 22 100 - 300 100 - 300 100 - 300 100 - 300 1000 - 10000 211 - 303 84 - 316 575 - 675 575 - 675 575 - 675 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 575 - 675 575 - 675 45 - 55 45 - 55 45 - 55 1000 - 10000 20 - 40 30 - 100 30 - 100 211 - 303 20 - 150 20 - 150 20 - 150 20 - 40 20 - 150 20 - 150 20 - 150 20 - 150 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 20 - 150 Z04a, M13 Z04a, L06, M13 Z04a, N12, M13 Y/0.6′′/810′′ Z11, M13 T8, S12 Z04b, T8 Z04b, T8 Z04b, T8 Z04b, M13 M01b, N12 M01b, N12 M01b, N12 M01b, N12 Y/2.2′′ Y/4600′′ Y/4.2′′ L06, F08 B07, M08, Mk08 Y/43.2′′ Y/705.2′′ M01b B85 M01b Y/192.4′′ Y/85.1′′ Y/1.8′′ Y/2.1′′ Y/2.1′′ Y/612′′ M01b, M10, N12 M01b, M10 N12 M10 M10 Z06 Z13 Z13 F04, L06 M01a, M10 M01b J94 K14 M01b, M10 M01a, M01b M01b M01a, M01b M01b, L06 1 8 YMG LA β Pictoris Columba Her-Lyr TW Hydrae Ursa Major Ursa Major Ursa Major Ursa Major Carina/Columba β Pictoris HD HIP Other RA DEC H Mag Spectral Type Distance (pc) TABLE 3 -- Continued 129333 181327 82443 116956 177724 29697 7590 217813 128311 147513 150706 175742 76644 82558 92139 112429 115383 141795 124498 220182 20630 130948 142 4208 10697 3651 20367 222404 27442 33636 39091 50554 75289 82943 92788 95128 114386 114783 192263 117176 134987 141937 143761 145675 71631 95270 46843 65515 93747 21818 5944 113829 71395 80337 80902 92919 44127 46816 51986 63076 64792 77622 69562 115331 15457 72567 522 3479 8159 3093 15323 116727 19921 24205 26394 33212 43177 47007 52409 53721 64295 64457 99711 65721 74500 77740 78459 79248 GJ 3789 14 39 00.210 19 22 58.943 09 32 43.759 13 25 45.533 19 05 24.608 04 41 18.856 01 16 29.253 23 03 04.977 14 36 00.560 16 24 01.289 16 31 17.585 18 55 53.225 08 59 12.454 09 32 25.568 10 37 18.140 12 55 28.548 13 16 46.516 13 31 46.617 15 50 48.966 14 14 21.357 23 21 36.513 03 19 21.696 14 50 15.811 00 06 19.175 00 44 26.651 01 44 55.825 00 39 21.806 03 17 40.045 23 39 20.852 04 16 29.029 05 11 46.448 05 37 09.892 06 54 42.825 08 47 40.390 09 34 50.737 10 42 48.528 10 59 27.973 13 10 39.824 13 12 43.786 20 13 59.846 13 28 25.809 15 13 28.667 15 52 17.547 16 01 02.662 16 10 24.314 +64 17 29.95 -54 32 16.97 +26 59 18.70 +56 58 13.78 +13 51 48.52 +20 54 05.45 +42 56 21.90 +20 55 06.87 +09 44 47.46 -39 11 34.71 +79 47 23.20 +23 33 23.93 +48 02 30.57 -11 11 04.70 -48 13 32.23 +65 26 18.51 +09 25 26.96 +29 16 36.72 +04 28 39.83 -15 21 21.76 +44 05 52.38 +03 22 12.72 +23 54 42.64 -49 04 30.68 -26 30 56.45 +20 04 59.34 +21 15 01.71 +31 07 37.36 +77 37 56.19 -59 18 07.76 +04 24 12.73 -80 28 08.84 +24 14 44.02 -41 44 12.45 -12 07 46.37 -02 11 01.52 +40 25 48.92 -35 03 17.21 -02 15 54.13 -00 52 00.77 +13 46 43.64 -25 18 33.65 -18 26 09.84 +33 18 12.63 +43 49 03.53 6.012 5.980 5.242 5.481 3.048 5.310 5.258 5.232 5.303 4.025 5.639 5.762 2.763 5.596 3.170 4.604 4.107 7.002 3.440 6.781 5.574 3.039 4.688 4.646 6.243 4.678 4.064 5.117 1.190 1.814 5.633 4.424 5.516 5.187 5.245 5.798 3.736 6.497 5.623 5.685 3.457 5.121 5.866 3.989 4.803 G1.5V F5/F6V G9V G9V A0Vn K3V G0 G5V K0 G3/G5V G0 K0V A7Vn K0V F4IV A5n G0V M4V A2m K4V K1V G5Vvar G2V F7V G5V G5IV K0V F8V K1III K2III G0 G0V F8V F9VFe+0.3 F9VFe+0.5 G6V G0V K3V K1V K2.5V G5V G5V G2/G3V G2V K0V 34.1 51.8 17.8 21.6 25.5 13.2 23.2 24.7 16.5 12.8 28.2 21.4 14.5 18.6 26.8 29.3 17.6 7.9c 21.6 30.2 21.5 9.14 18.2 25.7 32.4 32.6 11.0 26.7 14.1 18.2 28.4 18.3 29.9 29.2 27.5 35.5 14.0 28.9 20.5 19.3 18.0 26.2 32.3 17.2 17.6 Age (Myr) YMG / Age Reference M01a, M01b Z01, Z04b B14 F04, M10 N12 M01a, M01b F04, M10 M01b, K03 K03 V12 F86, T11 P09 P09 M10, V12 R14 V12 C10, M13 G00, B07, M08 M08 , M10, V12 D09 20 - 150 12 - 22 20 - 40 211 - 303 8 - 12 400 - 600 400 - 600 400 - 600 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 400 - 600 450 - 1050 50 - 75 50 - 150 50 - 450 130 - 160 20 - 40 220 - 820 12 - 10000 200-318 350-700 640-1001 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 Binarity Y/0.8′′ Y/64.7′′ Y/1494.63′′ Y/345′′ Y/0.7′′/2.4′′ Y/0.5′′ Y/0.1′′/2.6′′ Y/4.1′′ Y/42.9′′ Y/0.9′′ Y/13.1′′ Y/21.5′′ 1 9 TABLE 3 -- Continued HD HIP Other RA DEC H Mag Spectral Type Distance (pc) YMG Age (Myr) YMG / Age Reference Binarity 160691 216435 210277 216437 74575 59967 73350 37124 52265 36705 21845 102077 105963 139084 172555 202730 218738 51849 141272 155555 220140 11131 43162 160934 9826 13445 46375 162020 186427 190360 86796 113044 109378 113137 42828 36515 42333 26381 33719 25647 16563 57269 59432 76629 92024 105319 114379 33560 77408 84586 115147 8486 29568 86346 7513 10138 31246 87330 96901 98767 AF Hor 17 44 08.701 22 53 37.932 22 09 29.866 22 54 39.482 08 43 35.538 07 30 42.512 08 37 50.294 05 37 02.486 07 00 18.036 02 41 47.31 05 28 44.830 03 33 13.491 11 44 38.463 12 11 27.754 15 38 57.543 18 45 26.900 21 19 51.990 23 09 57.372 06 58 26.051 15 48 09.463 17 17 25.505 23 19 26.633 01 49 23.356 06 13 45.296 17 38 39.634 01 36 47.842 02 10 25.934 06 33 12.622 17 50 38.355 19 41 51.972 20 03 37.406 -51 50 02.59 -48 35 53.83 -07 32 55.15 -70 04 25.35 -33 11 10.99 -37 20 21.70 -06 48 24.78 +20 43 50.84 -05 22 01.78 -52 59 30.7 -65 26 54.86 +46 15 26.53 -49 25 02.75 +53 25 17.45 -57 42 27.34 -64 52 16.54 -53 26 57.93 +47 57 30.13 -12 59 30.58 +01 34 18.27 -66 57 03.73 +79 00 12.67 -10 42 12.86 -23 51 42.98 +61 14 16.03 +41 24 19.64 -50 49 25.42 +05 27 46.53 -40 19 06.07 +50 31 03.08 +29 53 48.49 3.724 4.687 4.957 4.923 4.227 5.253 5.318 6.021 5.033 7.851 4.845 6.457 6.642 5.867 5.994 4.251 4.224 5.788 6.368 5.610 4.907 5.512 5.289 4.863 6.998 2.957 4.245 6.072 6.649 4.695 4.239 G5V G0V G8V G1VFe+0.3 B1.5III G3V G5V G4IV-V G0V M2Ve K0V K2 K1V K0V K0V A7V A5V G5Ve K4V G8V G5IV G9V G1Vk G5V K7Ve F8V K0V K1IV K3V G5V G7IV-V 15.5 32.6 21.6 26.8 269.5 21.8 24.0 33.7 29.0 27.0d 15.2 34.4 48.6 30.2 38.5 28.6 30.3 23.7 21.7 21.3 31.5 19.2 22.6 16.7 33.1 13.5 10.8 34.8 29.4 21.2 15.9 Castor Hyades Tuc-Hor AB Dor AB Dor β Pictoris β Pictoris LA β Pictoris Ursa Major IC 2391 AB Dor 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 13.2 - 18.4 100 - 300 575 - 675 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 20 - 40 70 - 120 70 - 120 30 - 120 242 - 302 12 - 22 12 - 22 50 - 900 12.7 - 48 30 - 220 20 - 150 12 - 22 16 - 50 400 - 600 45 - 55 70 - 120 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 1000 - 10000 T11 N12 M10, T12 M13, Z04b Z04a, L06, M13 Z04a, L06, M13 W14 B07, M08 Z04b, M13 Z04b, M13 P09, V12 P09, T11 P09, T11 M01b, M10 Z04b, M13 Mk07, T11 M01b, M10, N12 M10, N12 Z04a, L06, M13 Y/22.1′′ Y/8.9′′ Y/9.6′′ Y/0.2′′ Y/13.5′′ Y/10.2′′ Y/71.4′′ Y/7.3′′ Y/15.8′′ Y/0.7′′ Y/17.9′′ Y/34.04′′ Y/10.8′′/962.6′′ Y/192.9′′ Y/24.6′′/164′′ Y/0.12′′ Y/55.4′′ Y/2.4′′ Y/11.2′′ Y/41.6′′ Y/178.2′′ 2 0 NOTE. -- Target right ascension (RA) and declination (DEC) values are taken from the revised Hipparcos catalogue (van Leeuwen 2007) at equinox=J2000, epoch=J2000 computed by Vizier. H band magnitudes are taken from 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri et al. 2003). Distances taken from revised Hipparcos catalogue unless noted otherwise with indices [a,b,c,d], relevant references given below. Column 9 notes YMG membership. Age estimates for YMG targets are taken from estimates of the group age given in table 2. Targets with unconstrained ages are assigned an age of 1 - 10 Gyr. Column 11 notes literature sources identifying YMG membership, or the sources estimating age for several young targets with no known YMG membership. Column 12 notes Y for targets identified as part of a binary system and gives the separation of the binary companion, identification and separation values are taken from the Washington double star catalogue (Mason et al. 2001). a(Plavchan et al. 2009) b(Montes et al. 2001a) c(Gliese & Jahreiss 1991) d(Riaz et al. 2006) References. -- (B07) (Barnes 2007); (B14) (Brandt et al. 2014); (B85) (Bubenicek et al. 1985); (C10) (Chauvin et al. 2010); (D09) (Dupuy et al. 2009); (F04, F08) (Fuhrmann 2004, 2008); (F86) (Fekel et al. 1986); (G00) (Gaidos et al. 2000); (J94) (Jeffries et al. 1994); (K03) (King et al. 2003); (K14) (Kraus et al. 2014b); (L06) (L´opez-Santiago et al. 2006); (M01a, M01b) (Montes et al. 2001a,b); (M08) (Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008); (M10) (Maldonado et al. 2010); (M13) (Malo et al. 2013); (Mk07, Mk08) (Makarov et al. 2007, 2008); (N12) (Nakajima & Morino 2012); (P09) (Plavchan et al. 2009) ; (R14) (Riedel et al. 2014); (S12) (Schlieder et al. 2012); (T8) (Torres et al. 2008); (T11) (Tetzlaff et al. 2011); (T12) (Tabernero et al. 2012); (V12) (Vican 2012); (W14) (Wollert et al. 2014); (Z01) (Zuckerman et al. 2001); (Z04a, Z04b) (Zuckerman et al. 2004; Zuckerman & Song 2004); (Z06, Z11, Z13) (Zuckerman et al. 2006, 2011, 2013). 2 1
0912.3356	1	0912	2009-12-17T10:18:25	Dust Properties of Protoplanetary Disks in the Taurus-Auriga Star Forming Region from Millimeter Wavelengths	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present the most sensitive 3 mm-survey to date of protoplanetary disks carried in the Taurus-Auriga star forming region (average rms of about 0.3 mJy), using the IRAM PdBI. With our high detection rate of 17/19, we provide the first detections at wavelengths longer than about 1 mm for 12 sources. This enables us to study statistically the mm SED slopes and dust properties of faint disks and compare them to brighter disks using a uniform analysis method. With these new data and literature measurements at sub-millimeter and millimeter wavelengths, we analyze the dust properties of a sample of 21 isolated disks around T Tauri stars in the Taurus-Auriga star forming region. Together with the information about the disks spatial extension from sub/mm-mm interferometric studies, we derive from the observed sub-mm/mm spectral energy distribution constraints on the dust opacity law at these wavelengths, using two-layer flared disk models and a self-consistent dust model that takes properly into account the variation of the dust opacity with grain growth. We find evidence for the presence in the disk midplane of dust particles that have grown to sizes as large as at least 1 millimeter in all the disks of our sample, confirming what was previously observed on smaller brighter objects. This indicates that the dust coagulation from ISM dust to mm-sized grains is a very fast process in protoplanetary disks, that appears to occur before a young stellar object enters the Class II evolutionary stage. Also, the amount of these large grains in the disk outer regions is stationary throughout all the Class II evolutionary stage, indicating that mechanisms slowing down the dust inward migration are playing an important role in the Taurus-Auriga protoplanetary disks.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. 6439 May 20, 2018 c(cid:13) ESO 2018 9 0 0 2 c e D 7 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 6 5 3 3 . 2 1 9 0 : v i X r a Dust Properties of Protoplanetary Disks in the Taurus-Auriga Star Forming Region from Millimeter Wavelengths L. Ricci1, L. Testi1,2, A. Natta2, R. Neri3, S. Cabrit4, and G. J. Herczeg5 1 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany 2 INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo Fermi 5, I-50125 Firenze, Italy 3 Institut de Radioastronomie Millim´etrique, 300 Rue de la Piscine, F-38406 Saint Martin d'H`eres, France 4 LERMA, UMR 8112 du CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, 61 Av. de l'Observatoire, F-75014 Paris, France 5 Max Planck Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik, Postfach 1312, D-85741 Garching, Germany Received 2009 October 5/ Accepted 2009 December 15 ABSTRACT We present the most sensitive 3 mm-survey to date of protoplanetary disks carried in the Taurus-Auriga star forming region (average rms of about 0.3 mJy), using the IRAM PdBI. With our high detection rate of 17/19, we provide the first detections at wavelengths longer than about 1 mm for 12 sources. This enables us to study statistically the mm SED slopes and dust properties of faint disks and compare them to brighter disks using a uniform analysis method. With these new data and literature measurements at sub-millimeter and millimeter wavelengths, we analyze the dust properties of a sample of 21 isolated disks around T Tauri stars in the Taurus-Auriga star forming region. Together with the information about the disks spatial extension from sub/mm-mm interferometric studies, we derive from the observed sub-mm/mm spectral energy distribution constraints on the dust opacity law at these wavelengths, using two-layer flared disk models and a self-consistent dust model that takes properly into account the variation of the dust opacity with grain growth. We find evidence for the presence in the disk midplane of dust particles that have grown to sizes as large as at least 1 millimeter in all the disks of our sample, confirming what was previously observed on smaller brighter objects. This indicates that the dust coagulation from ISM dust to mm-sized grains is a very fast process in protoplanetary disks, that appears to occur before a young stellar object enters the Class II evolutionary stage. Also, the amount of these large grains in the disk outer regions is stationary throughout all the Class II evolutionary stage, indicating that mechanisms slowing down the dust inward migration are playing an important role in the Taurus-Auriga protoplanetary disks. Another result is that the spectral index between 1 and 3 mm for the 6 faintest disks in our sample is on average smaller than for the brighter disks, indicating either that these fainter, yet unmapped, disks are spatially much less extended than the brighter spatially resolved disks, or that fainter disks have typically larger dust grains in their outer regions. Considering that these fainter disks are more representative of the bulk of the disk population than the brighter ones, this may have important consequences for the theories of planetesimal formation and disk formation and evolution. Finally, we investigate the relations between the derived dust properties, namely dust mass and grain growth, and the properties of the central star, like its mass, age and mass accretion rate. Key words. stars: planetary systems: protoplanetary disks -- stars: planetary systems: formation -- stars: formation 1. Introduction Circumstellar disks play a fundamental role in the physical processes involved in star and planet formation. In these systems part of the material (gas and dust) loses angu- lar momentum and accretes onto the central forming star, while another part of it may give birth to a planetary sys- tem. Although the content of dust is only a small fraction of the overall material in a circumstellar disk, dust grains are crucial elements in the early stages of planet forma- tion. According to the core-accretion scenario (Safronov & Zvjagina 1969, Pollack et al. 1996), growth from an ini- tial ISM population of submicrometer-sized dust grains to planetesimals of 1 − 100 km sizes is believed to be the key mechanism of early planet formation. These planetesimals "embryos" then continue to grow leading to the formation of at least terrestrial planets and possibly the cores of giant planets. Observational evidence of grain growth from the ISM dust has been obtained from a variety of techniques at dif- ferent wavelengths. Throop et al. (2001) observed in optical and near-infrared the translucent edge of the 114-426 pro- toplanetary disk in the Orion Nebula Cluster, and derived from the extinction curve of the background nebular emis- sion a lower limit of a few microns for the dust grains in the very outer regions of the disk, about 500 AU away from the central star. Another method to probe the presence of large grains in the disk is through the shape and intensity of the 10- and 20-µm silicate features. The data indicate a large variety of silicate profiles, ranging from strongly peaked silicate bands and steeply rising spectral energy distribu- tions (SEDs) to "boxy" silicate profiles and flatter SEDs (ISO, Malfait et al. 1998; Spitzer Space Telescope, Kessler- Silacci et al. 2006). The boxy features with low feature-to- continuum ratios are interpreted as grain growth to micron size (Bouwman et al. 2001). However, the techniques outlined so far can only probe dust grains as large as some µm in the disk surface layers. They are not sensitive to larger grains in the disk mid- 2 Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga plane, the region in which planet formation is supposed to occur. In order to probe larger grains in the midplane, ob- servations at millimeter wavelengths are needed. Beckwith & Sargent (1991) showed that T Tauri stars have shallow SEDs at sub-millimeter wavelengths. Under the assumption of optically thin emission at these frequencies, this implies a dust opacity dependence on wavelength (κmm ∝ λ−β) much flatter than in the ISM (βISM = 1.7), which is naturally in- terpreted in terms of grain growth (see e.g. Draine 2006). However, this interpretation of the disk SEDs is not unique, since the same data can be explained by very small opti- cally thick disks. To break this degeneracy and sort out the effect of potentially large optical depth it is neces- sary to spatially resolve the disks to determine their actual sizes. Furthermore, in this context observations at millime- ter wavelengths are very useful, since at these lower fre- quencies the impact of optically thick disk inner regions to the total emission is expected to be lower. Therefore, to actually probe the dust properties in protoplanetary disks, one needs to combine the determination of the sub- millimeter/millimeter SED with information on the disk extension from high-angular resolution interferometric ob- servations (see e.g. Testi et al. 2001). In the last years, several sub-mm/mm interferometric observations have been carried out to investigate dust grain growth in protoplanetary disks. Wilner et al. (2000) re- solved the disk around the TW Hya pre-main-sequence (PMS) star at 7 mm using the Very Large Array (VLA). Extensive modelling of the SED of this source has shown that the dust grains in the outer parts of the TW Hya disk have grown to at least ∼ 1 cm (Calvet et al. 2002). An analogous result has been obtained for the disk around CQ Tau (Testi et al. 2003). More recently, Rodmann et al. (2006) resolved 10 disks in the Taurus-Auriga star form- ing region and found clear evidence of grain growth in 4 of them. Lommen et al. (2007) resolved 1 disk in Chamaeleon and 4 in Lupus with the Submillimeter Array (SMA) at 1.4 mm and with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) at 3.3 mm, and found clear evidence of dust grain growth to sizes of a few millimeter for 4 of them. Finally Schaefer et al. (2009) observed a sample of 23 low mass PMS stars (with spectral types of K7 and later) in Taurus- Auriga at 1.3 mm and 2.6 mm with the Plateau de Bure Interferometer (PdBI); they detected only 8 sources at 1.3 mm and 6 at 2.6 mm, and found evidence of grain growth for the 3 disks that they could spatially resolve. In this paper we present our analysis on 21 protoplane- tary disks around T Tauri stars in the Taurus-Auriga star forming region without stellar companions in the range 0.05′′ −3.5′′. For 11 of these objects, mainly faint disks with F1.3mm < 100 mJy, we have obtained new data at ∼ 3 mm with the Plateau de Bure Interferometer1 (hereafter PdBI) with an average rms of about 0.3 mJy. Together with the data already present in the literature at sub/mm- and mm- wavelengths, and with the information obtained in the last years on the disks spatial extension from high-angular reso- lution interferometric observations at mm wavelengths, we investigate the dust properties in the disks, namely grain growth and dust mass, and their relation with the proper- ties of the central star. 1 The Plateau de Bure Interferometer at IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS (France), MPG (Germany) and IGN (Spain). In Section 2 we present our new PdBI data, the proper- ties of our sample, the method we used to estimate the main stellar physical quantities, and the data we used for our analysis. In Section 3 we describe the disk models adopted for the analysis of the disks sub-mm/mm SED. In Section 4 we show and discuss the results of our study in terms of dust grain growth and dust mass, whereas in Section 5 we summarize our main findings. 2. New 3mm observations and sample properties 2.1. New PdBI observations We observed a total list of 19 targets; 16 of them were se- lected to be relatively faint, with 15 mJy< F1.3mm < 100 mJy and with no known detections beyond about 1mm; the other 3 (HL, DO and DR Tau) are brighter sources that were observed for references purposes. The observa- tions were carried out with PdBI between July and August, 2007. Owing to antenna maintenance work, all observations were carried out in a subarray of the six-element interfer- ometer. The antennas were arranged in very compact con- figurations that provided sensitive baselines from 15 m to 80 m. The dual-polarization receivers, which were observ- ing in the 3mm band, had typical receiver temperatures of about 35 K and were providing image sideband rejection values better than 10 dB. To achieve maximum sensitivity in the continuum, the spectral correlator was adjusted to cover a total effective bandwidth of about 2 GHz. The observing procedures were set up to fill in gaps in the scheduling without any specific tuning wavelength within the 3mm band. Visibilities were obtained using on- source integration times of 22 min interspersed with 2 min calibrations on a nearby calibrator. Each star was observed on one or more occasions for a minimum of 40 min and a maximum of 2 hr on-source. The atmospheric phase stabil- ity on the baselines was always better than 40◦, consistent with seeing conditions of 1′′-3′′, typical for summer. The ab- solute flux density scale was calibrated on 3C84, 0528+134, MWC349 and Mars, and was found to be accurate to 10%. The receiver passband shape was determined with excellent precision on a strong calibrator like 3C84. We used the GILDAS package for the data reduction and analysis. The data were calibrated in the antenna based manner. The continuum visibilities were gridded with nat- ural weighting and no taper to maximize the sensitivity. Since none of the target stars was found to be resolved in synthesized beams of 2′′-4′′, a point source model was fit- ted to the calibrated visibilities of each star to estimate the flux density of the continuum in the 3mm band. The results are summarized in Table 1. Among the 19 targets, 17 were detected, including 14 of the 16 faint sources, thanks to our good sensitivity; 12 of these are first detections longward of about 1mm, strongly expanding the available database of 3mm data towards fainter disks. The 2.6mm detections of LkHa 358 and GO Tau were recently published by Schaefer et al. (2009). In Sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 we describe the final sample used for our analysis of dust properties, the adopted method to estimate the stellar properties and mass accretion rates summarized in Table 2, whereas in 2.5 we report the sub- mm/mm data that we collected from the literature for our analysis. Table 1. Summary of the new PdBI observations. Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga 3 Object α (J2000) δ (J2000) ν (GHz) λ (mm) Fν (mJy) rms (mJy) Comments1 CW Tau CX Tau DE Tau DK Tau DO Tau DP Tau DR Tau DS Tau FM Tau FP Tau FY Tau FZ Tau GK Tau GO Tau Haro 6-28 HL Tau HO Tau LkHa 358 SU Aur 04:14:17.0 04:14:47.8 04:21:55.6 04:30:44.3 04:38:28.6 04:42:37.7 04:47:06.2 04:47:48.6 04:14:13.5 04:14:47.4 04:32:30.5 04:32:31.8 04:33:34.6 04:43:03.1 04:35:56.9 04:31:38.4 04:35:20.2 04:31:36.2 04:55:59.4 28:10:56.51 26:48:11.16 27:55:05.55 26:01:23.96 26:10:49.76 25:15:37.56 16:58:43.05 29:25:10.96 28:12:48.84 26:46:26.65 24:19:56.69 24:20:02.53 24:21:06.07 25:20:17.38 22:54:36.63 18:13:57.37 22:32:13.98 18:13:43.20 30:34:10.39 84.2 86.2 92.6 84.2 84.2 84.2 100.8 100.8 100.8 100.8 100.8 100.8 100.8 86.2 87.0 84.5 87.0 84.5 84.5 3.44 3.57 1.01 3.49 3.32 3.23 4.70 3.57 3.57 13.80 3.57 < 0.78 13.90 2.97 2.97 2.96 2.65 2.97 11.80 2.97 2.97 1.90 2.97 2.89 2.97 < 0.96 4.05 3.49 0.92 3.45 3.53 43.40 2.03 3.45 2.46 3.53 3.53 2.88 0.31 0.13 0.25 0.20 0.29 0.26 0.47 0.21 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.24 0.32 0.34 0.18 0.68 0.53 0.22 0.19 2.5′′ binary no sub-mm info no sub-mm info no sub-mm info 2.5′′ binary 0.7′′ binary flat spectrum no sub-mm info 1) Reason why the source has not been considered in the analysis (see text for more details). 2.2. Sample Our final sample of 21 sources consists of all young stellar objects (YSO) in Taurus-Auriga catalogued in Andrews & Williams (2005) that fulfill the following criteria: (1) a Class II infrared SED, in order to avoid contamination of sub-mm fluxes by a residual envelope; (2) information on the central star through optical-NIR spectroscopic/photometric data, necessary to calculate self-consistent disk SED models; (3) one detection at ∼ 3mm (either from our new PdBI obser- vations or from the literature) and at least one detection in the 0.45 mm < λ < 0.85 mm spectral region. This selection criterion was chosen in order to probe a broad enough spec- tral window to efficiently constrain the optically thin part of the sub-mm/mm spectral energy distribution (SED); (4) no evidence of stellar companions in the 0.05−3.5′′ range in angular separation. This range corresponds to about 5−500 AU in projected physical separation at the Taurus-Auriga star forming region distance, here assumed to be 140 pc for all the sources of our sample (Bertout et al. 1999). The limit of 3.5 arcsec ensures that mm interferometric flux measure- ments, of typical resolution 1 arcsec, are not contaminated by the companion's disk, while binaries closer than 5 AU should have outer disk properties similar to those of single stars on the scales probed by (sub-)mm data. Only by Andrews & Williams (2005) fulfill the above 4 criteria. They are catalogued 21 sources listed in Table 2, and include 11 sources from our PdBI sample2. Figure 1 reports histograms that describe the com- pleteness level of our final sample with respect to all Taurus-Auriga Class II YSOs catalogued in Andrews & Williams (2005), and fulfilling the "isolation" criterion (4). Our sample contains 63% of these "isolated" class II show- ing a flux at ∼ 0.85mm greater than 100 mJy, and 31% of the sources with lower 0.85mm fluxes. Therefore, our sam- ple is not complete even for the brightest YSOs at 0.85mm. This is due to a lack of observations at ∼ 3mm for these sources. However, thanks to the high sensitivity of our new PdBI observations (see Section 2.1) our sample enables us to study statistically for the first time the dust properties 2 The 8 sources dropped from the PdBI sample are HL Tau (a flat spectrum source that retains an envelope; Padgett et al. 1999); DP Tau, FP Tau, FY Tau and LkHa 358 that have no available submm detections for SED fitting; and DK Tau, GK Tau and Haro 6-28 which are binary systems with an- gular separations of 2.5′′ (Simon et al. 1992), 2.5′′ (Reipurth & Zinnecker 1993) and 0.7′′ (Leinert et al. 1993) respectively. We keep in our sample the wide binaries DS Tau and HO Tau (angular separations of 7.1′′ and 6.9′′ respectively, Mathieu et al. 1994); they do not show any emission from the compan- ions from our new 3 mm interferometric observations. The other dropped multiple systems from the AW05 catalog are DH Tau (2.3′′ binary, Itoh et al. 2005) , GG Tau (quadruple system with a circumbinary ring of inner and outer radii of 180 and 260 AU respectively, Pinte et al. 2007), and UY Aur (0.9′′ binary, Leinert et al. 1993) 4 Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga of faint disks (i.e. with F1.3mm < 100 mJy, F0.85mm < 100 mJy) and compare them to the brighter ones using a uni- form analysis method. In terms of the stellar properties, it is important to note that the Andrews & Williams (2005) cat- alogue includes only a few very low mass PMS stars: only stars with an estimated mass higher than about 0.2 M⊙ have been detected because of the sensitivity limits of the current facilities at sub-mm and mm wavelengths that make the detection of disks around very low mass YSOs very diffi- cult. The sensitivity limitation is even more severe at 3mm, therefore our final sample includes 58% of all the class II isolated sample of Andrews & Williams (2005) with an esti- mated mass greater than 0.4 M⊙, but only two sources with M⋆ < 0.4 M⊙ (out of 10 in Andrews & Williams 2005). 2.3. Stellar properties Spectral types for all the sources in our sample are taken from the literature (Kenyon & Hartmann 1995, Briceno et al. 1998) and cover a range from G2 (SU Aur) to M2.5 (CX Tau). Spectral types of M0 and earlier have been con- verted to effective temperatures with the dwarf tempera- ture scale of Schmidt-Kaler (1982), whereas for types later than M0 we adopted the temperature scale developed by Luhman 1999. Typical uncertainties for these sources are ∼ 1 − 1.5 in spectral sub-types or ∼ 100 − 150 K in tem- perature. The stellar luminosities of all the pre-main-sequence (PMS) stars were computed from their J-band flux (2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources, Cutri et al. 2003) to min- imize contamination from UV and IR excess emission. For the bolometric corrections we adopted the dwarf values from Kenyon & Hartmann (1995) that are considered to be satisfactory approximations for these young sources in the J-band (Luhman 1999). In order to estimate the amount of extinction toward these young sources, we calculated the color excesses using intrinsic colors provided by Kenyon & Hartmann (1995) for G2−K7 spectral types and by Leggett (1992) for M0−M2.5 types. To ensure that the color excess reflects only the ef- fect of reddening, minimizing the emission due to accretion, the typical selected colors are between the R and H bands. Since for some of the objects at later spectral types in our sample R − I measurements are not available, we dered- dened the J − H and H − Ks colors from the 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources3 to the locus observed for clas- sical T Tauri stars (CTTS) by Meyer et al. (1997), following the method described in Briceno et al. (2002). Extinctions are finally calculated adopting the extinction law of Rieke & Lebofsky (1985). The computed photospheric luminosities cover a range from 0.16 L⊙ (HO Tau) to 10.6 L⊙ (SU Aur). Considering the uncertainties in the photometry, reddenings, bolometric corrections and distance, the typical errors in the bolomet- ric luminosities are ±0.08 − 0.13 in log L⋆. Slight differ- ences from the values obtained by other authors are typi- cally within the uncertainties and are not significant for the purposes of this paper. 3 For this analysis the JHKs magnitudes have been transformed from the 2MASS photometric system to the Johnson-Glass one using the color transformations reported in Carpenter (2001) and Bessell & Brett (1988). Fig. 2. H-R diagram for the sources of our sample. The dashed lines correspond to the isochrones for ages in Myr as labeled at the right end of the lines from the 1999 PMS evolutionary models, while the solid ones represent the evo- lutionary tracks from the same models for PMS stars with masses as labeled at the top of the evolutionary track lines. In this diagram the evolutionary tracks start from an age of 0.1 Myr. The errorbars for the (Teff, L⋆) values of our objects are not shown, the uncertainties in the photomet- ric parameters are typically ∼ 0.08 − 0.13 in log L⋆ and ∼ 100 − 150 K in temperature. Given the effective temperatures and photospheric lu- minosities, we placed the PMS stars on the H-R diagram and derived stellar masses and ages adopting the theoretical tracks and isocrones of Palla & Stahler (1999) (see Figure 2). One important source of uncertainty for stellar masses and ages is given by the spread of values obtainable by using different PMS evolutionary models. For example, if compared to the ones obtained with the Baraffe et al. (1998) models, our adopted values of stellar masses and ages are typically lower by a factor of ∼ 1.5 and ∼ 2 respectively. Our choice of using the Palla & Stahler (1999) models is uniquely due to the more complete coverage of the HR di- agram plane, that allows us to use the same evolutionary models for all the sources of our sample. One should al- ways bear in mind the high uncertainty associated to these quantities, expecially to the stellar age (see Section 4.1 for a more deailed discussion about the estimates of YSO ages). According to the Palla & Stahler (1999) models the ranges spanned by our sample go from about 0.3 M⊙ (CX Tau) to 2.2 M⊙ (RY Tau) in stellar masses and from about 0.1 Myr (UZ Tau E) to 17 Myr (DS Tau) in stellar ages. The main stellar quantities described here are summa- rized in Table 2. 2.4. Mass accretion rates Given the stellar luminosities and effective temperatures we calculated the stellar radii using the Stefan-Boltmann law. Once the stellar mass M⋆ and radius R⋆ are set, the mass accretion rate Macc can be directly obtained from an estimate of the accretion luminosity Lacc by Macc = 1.25 R⋆Lacc GM⋆ , (1) Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga 5 Fig. 1. Histograms higlighting some properties of our selected sample. In all the histograms our sample is represented by black+grey columns, the black columns represent the disks in our sample for which we obtained new PdBI data at ∼ 3 mm, while the total columns (black+grey+white) include all the class II YSOs from the Andrews & Williams (2005) catalogue with no evidence of stellar companions in the 0.05 − 3.5′′ interval in angular separation, from which our sample has been selected (see text). Upper left histogram represents the distribution of the ∼0.85 mm fluxes, including upper limits, for all the sources but two, 04113+2758 and GM Aur, that have not been observed at ∼0.85 mm. Upper right and bottom histograms show the distribution of stellar spectral type and estimated stellar mass (see Section 2.3) respectively. Four class II YSOs are not included in these histograms because for them an estimate of the stellar spectral type is not available. These are 04301+2608, FT Tau, Haro 6-39 and IC 2087. where G is the gravitational constant and the factor of ∼ 1.25 is calculated assuming a disk truncation radius of ∼ 5 R⋆ (Gullbring et al. 1998). The estimates of Lacc were obtained from spectroscopic detections of excess Balmer continuum emission in the lit- erature (see references in Table 2). These estimates are obtained primarily from measuring the excess flux in the Balmer continuum shortward of 3646 A. The luminos- ity is then obtained by applying a bolometric correction calculated from shock models (Calvet & Gullbring 1998, Gullbring et al. 2000) or simplistic plane-parallel slabs (Valenti et al. 1993, Gullbring et al. 1998). Two sources in our sample, FZ Tau and GO Tau, do not have literature estimates of accretion luminosity from the excess Balmer continuum emission. We obtained the accretion luminosity for these two sources from low- resolution spectra from 3200 -- 8700 A obtained with the Double Spectrograph at the 5m Hale Telescope at Palomar. The accretion luminosity was then calculated from the ex- cess Balmer continuum emission, following the method de- scribed in Herczeg & Hillenbrand (2008). 2.5. Disks sub-mm and mm data from the literature In order to probe the sub-millimetre and millimeter SED we collected data of the dust continuum emission between ∼ 0.450 to ∼ 7 mm from several works in the literature, listed in Table 3. These data, except for 7 mm measure- ments, have been used together with the new PdBI ob- servations at ∼ 3 mm to constrain the disk properties by fitting the sub-mm/mm SED with the models described in Section 3. The 7-mm data is excluded because free-free emission from ionized gas contaminates disk emission, with free-free emission typically contributing ∼ 20% of the 7mm flux (Rodmann et al. 2006). Simultaneous cm observations are required to constrain the free-free emission at 7mm, which is variable on short timescales (< ∼ a few days, see Lommen et al. 2009). Only 2 disks in our sample (RY Tau and UZ Tau E) have been observed nearly simultane- ously at centimeter and millimeter wavelengths (Rodmann et al. 2006), without which the 7mm fluxes should be con- sidered only as upper limits for the dust emission. We there- fore did not include the 7mm data in our analysis, although we included the available 7mm data from the literature in Figure 4 and verified a posteriori that the fluxes of our disk 6 Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga Table 2. Stellar properties. Object ST Teff (K) L⋆ (L⊙) Lacc Ref. (Lacc)a (L⊙) R⋆ (R⊙) Log Macc (M⊙ yr−1) M⋆ (M⊙) Age (Myr) AA Tau K7 CI Tau K7 CW Tau K3 CX Tau M2.5 CY Tau M1 DE Tau M2 DL Tau K7 DM Tau M1 DN Tau M0 DO Tau M0 DR Tau K7 DS Tau K2 FM Tau M0 FZ Tau M0 GM Aur K3 GO Tau M0 HO Tau M0.5 IQ Tau M0.5 RY Tau K1 SU Aur G2 UZ Tau E M1 4060 4060 4730 3488 3705 3560 4060 3705 3850 3850 4060 4900 3850 3850 4730 3850 3778 3778 5080 5860 3705 0.80 1.01 1.32 0.48 0.55 1.01 0.89 0.24 0.91 0.79 1.09 0.90 0.26 1.06 1.26 0.27 0.16 0.73 6.59 10.6 2.27 0.03 0.11 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.23 0.10 0.02 0.60 0.72 0.21 0.10 0.46 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.04 1.60 0.55 0.31 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 3 2 2 4 4 2 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.9 1.8 2.6 1.9 1.2 2.2 2.0 2.1 1.3 1.2 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.9 2.0 3.3 3.2 3.7 -8.56 -7.95 -8.58 -8.18 -8.24 -7.69 -7.66 -7.99 -8.55 -7.10 -7.12 -8.00 -8.13 -7.14 -8.44 -9.14 -9.13 -8.24 -7.03 -7.52 -7.02 0.8 0.8 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.6 1.2 0.6 0.5 0.6 2.2 1.7 0.5 2.4 1.7 6.6 0.8 1.4 0.2 2.2 3.6 1.1 1.3 1.5 17.0 6.3 0.8 7.2 4.8 8.7 1.2 1.1 2.2 0.1 a) References. (1) Gullbring et al. (1998); (2) Valenti et al. (1993), these accretion luminosities have been multiplied by a factor (140 pc/160 pc)2 to account for the current estimate of 140 pc for the distance to the Taurus-Auriga star forming region; (3) Herczeg et al. (2009); (4) Calvet et al. (2004). models for all sources are equal or less than the measured flux at 7mm. Simultaneous 7mm and cm-wavelength obser- vations with the EVLA will extend the coverage of the disk SED to longer wavelengths, in order to better constrain the millimeter-wavelengths dust opacity and to provide infor- mation on dust grains larger than ∼ 1 cm. 3. Disk models We compare the observational sub-mm/mm data with the two-layer models of flared disks (i.e. in hydrostatic equi- librium) heated by the stellar radiation as developed by Dullemond et al. (2001), following the schematization of Chiang & Goldreich (1997). These models have been used in the analysis of CQ Tau by Testi et al. (2003) and of a sample of 9 Herbig Ae stars by Natta et al. (2004) and we refer to these papers for a more detailed description. To completely characterize a model of the disk, we need to specify the stellar properties (i.e. the luminosity L⋆, ef- fective temperature Teff , mass M⋆ and distance d, assumed to be 140 pc for all the sources in our sample), some char- acteristics of the disk structure, namely the inner and outer radius (Rin and Rout, respectively), the parameters Σ1 and p defining the radial profile of the dust surface density as- sumed to be a power-law4 Σdust = Σdust,1(R/1 AU)−p, the disk inclination angle i (90o for an edge-on disk) and, lastly, the dust opacity. The millimeter SED is almost completely insensitive to some of the disk parameters, which cannot thus be constrained by our analysis. For example, the inner radius of the disk, Rin, affects the emission only at near and mid-infrared wavelengths. The outer radius Rout is a parameter that can be probed by high-angular resolution interferometric observations. In our sample 13 disks have been spatially resolved, yielding an estimate for Rout. It is important to note that different in- terferometric observations performed on the same disk can lead to very different values of Rout (≥ 100 AU) because 4 As shown by Hughes et al. (2008) and Isella et al. (2009), a tapered exponential edge in the surface density profile, physi- cally motivated by the viscous evolution of the disk, is able to ex- plain the apparent discrepancy between gas and dust outer radii derived from millimeter observations of protoplanetary disks. Here we want to note that when fitting the sub/mm-mm SED with an exponential tail instead of a truncated power-law, the dust opacity spectral index β (defined in Section 3.1) is un- changed, and disk masses vary by less than a factor of 2, even if the outer disk radius becomes much bigger (see, e.g., Table 4 in Kitamura et al. 2002). So the simpler truncated power-law model is a justified approximation for the purposes of this paper. Table 3. Literature sources for the sub-mm/mm data. Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga 7 λ (mm) Source Referencesa 0.450 0.600 0.624 0.769 0.800 0.850 0.880 1.056 1.100 1.200 1.300 1.330 2.000 2.700 3.100 3.400 7.000 1 2, 3 4 4 2, 3 1, 5 5 4 2, 3 6 1, 7, 8, 9, 10 5 2, 11 7, 8, 12, 13 8 9, 14 15 a) References. (1) Andrews & Williams (2005); (2) Mannings & Emerson (1994); (3) Adams et al. (1990); (4) Beckwith & Sargent (1991); (5) Andrews & Williams (2007); (6) Althenoff et al. (1994); (7) Dutrey et al. (1996); (8) Jensen et al. (1996); (9) Koerner et al. (1995); (10) Isella et al. (2009); (11) Kitamura et al. (2002); (12) Mundy et al. (1996); (13) Schaefer et al. (2009); (14) Ohashi et al. (1996); (15) Rodmann et al. (2006). of differences in the observations angular resolution, sen- sitivity, and methods for deriving the radius. Given these uncertainties in the determination of Rout, we consider a range of possible values for Rout rather than a single-value estimate, as listed in Table 4. For the 8 objects in our sam- ple that have not yet been mapped with angular resolu- tions smaller than a few arcseconds which may potentially resolve the disk, a fiducial interval of 100 − 300 AU has been assumed5. This adopted range for Rout comprises the vast majority of the disk outer radii distribution function as derived by Andrews & Williams (2007) through ∼ 1′′ an- gular resolution sub-millimeter observations of 24 disks in Taurus-Auriga and ρ−Ophiucus. We will discuss the impact of the outer disk uncertainty on the results of our analysis in Section 4. Here we want to note that with these values of Rout the disk emission at sub-mm/mm wavelengths is dom- inated by the outer disk regions (R > 30 AU) which are op- tically thin to their own radiation. An effect of this is that the millimeter SED does not depend on the disk inclina- tion angle i (for i <∼ 80◦), thus decreasing the number of the model parameters used to fit the observational SED. This is certainly true for the spatially resolved disks for which we have an estimate for Rout. The 8 unmapped objects could 5 We will refer to these sources (CW, CX, DE, DS, FM, FZ, HO Tau, and SU Aur) as "unmapped" for the rest of the paper. Note that they are all faint with F1mm < 120 mJy. This probably explains why for these objects no observations at high-angular resolution have been attempted yet: the sensitivity of the current (sub-)mm interferometers would be not high enough to detect the low surface brightness of the outer disk regions. have optically thick inner disks that contribute significantly to the sub-mm/mm emission. Since the disk outer radius cannot be constrained by the SED alone, interferometric imaging that spatially resolves these disks is the only way to get information on the exact value of Rout. Nevertheless, since the disks that have been spatially resolved so far show outer radii typically in the range 100 − 300 AU, we consider highly unlikely that a significant fraction of the unmapped disks have Rout < ∼ 50 AU, which would make the disk opti- cally thick even at mm wavelengths. 3.1. Dust opacity The last quantity that defines the disk model is the dust opacity, which depends on grain sizes, chemical composi- tions, and shapes (e.g. Miyake & Nakagawa 1993, Pollack et al. 1994, Draine et al. 2006). In order to extract from the sub-mm/mm SED quantitative estimates for the dust grain sizes and the dust mass in the disks, assumptions on the chemical composition and shape of the dust grains have to be made. For our discussion we considered porous composite spherical grains made of astronomical silicates, carbona- ceous materials and water ice (optical constants for the individual components from Weingartner & Draine 2001, Zubko et al. 1996, Warren 1984 respectively) adopting frac- tional abundances used by Pollack et al. (1994) (see caption of Figure 3). We considered a population of grains with a power-law size distribution n(a) ∝ a−q between a mini- mum and a maximum size, amin and amax, respectively. In 8 Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga the ISM, amin is a few tens of A, amax ∼ 0.1 − 0.2 µm, and q = 3.5 (Mathis et al. 1977, Draine & Lee 1984, by analysing extinction and scattering of starlinght from the interstellar dust). As discussed e.g. in Natta et al. (2004) in a protoplanetary disk, because of grain processing, one expects much larger values of amax than in the ISM, and a variety of possible q values, depending on the processes of grain coagulation and fragmentation that occur in the disk. Experimental studies of fragmentation from a single target have found values of q ranging from ≈ 1.9 for low- velocity collisions to ≈ 4 for catastrophic impacts (Davies & Ryan 1990), but the power-law index for fragments from shattering events integrated over a range of target masses need not be necessarily the same as in the case of a single target. In the disk, if the coagulation processes from the initial ISM-grains population dominate over the fragmen- tation ones, then a value for q that is lower than the ISM one is expected (the opposite should occur in the case of fragmentation playing the major role). In the adopted two-layer disk model, the disk is divided into the surface and midplane regions, and therefore two different opacity laws are considered. Because of the as- sumed vertical hydrodynamical equilibrium and dust set- tling, in a protoplanetary disk the content of mass in the midplane is much higher than in the surface. At millimeter wavelengths, where the disk is mostly optically thin to its own radiation, the midplane total emission dominates over the surface one (although the surface dust plays a crucial role for the heating of the disk). As a consequence, from our analysis we can extract information only on the dust opac- ity of the midplane, and for the rest of the paper when we consider the dust opacity we will mean only the midplane component. For the dust grains in the disk surface we assumed the same chemical composition and shape as for the midplane grains, whereas for their size distribution we assumed for amin and amax values around 0.1 µm (the sub-mm SED is insensitive to these values as long as amax in the surface is much lower than amax in the midplane, as expected if dust settling is important). Once the chemical composition and shape of the dust grains in the midplane are set, the dust opacity law depends on amin, amax and q. Considering a value of 0.1 µm for amin (the dependence of the millimeter dust opacity from this parameter turns out to be very weak), the models param- eters for our analysis are the stellar parameters (L⋆, Teff, M⋆), that have been set and listed in Table 2, plus the disk ones (Σdust,1, p, Rout, q, amax), or equivalently (Mdust, p, q, amax, Rout) where Mdust is the mass of dust in the disk. For reasons described in Section 4 it is convenient to approximate the millimeter dust opacity law discussed so far in terms of a power-law at millimiter wavelengths κ = κ1mm(λ/1 mm)−β, with κ1mm in units of cm2 per gram of dust. At a fixed value of q the relations between κ1mm, β and amax can be determined. These are shown in Figure 3 for q = 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4. 4. Results The sub-mm/mm SED fits for all the objects in our sample are reported in Figure 46. As discussed in Testi et al. (2003) 6 We did not include existing NIR and mid-IR data in our analysis because at these shorter wavelengths the disk emission and Natta et al. (2004), the only quantities that can be con- strained by the sub-mm/mm SED are the millimeter dust opacity spectral index β (in this paper calculated between 1 and 3 mm) and the Mdust × κ1mm product7. From the SED alone it is impossible to constrain the value of the surface density exponent p, since it is generally possible to fit the SED data with either very flat (p = 0.5) or very steep (p = 2) surface density profiles. However, all avail- able high angular resolution observations performed so far suggest that p ≤ 1.5 (e.g. Dutrey et al. 1996, Wilner et al. 2000, Kitamura et al. 2002, Testi et al. 2003, Andrews & Williams 2007, Isella et al. 2009, Andrews et al. 2009). The degeneracy of the SED on p and Rout has an im- pact onto the derived uncertainties for β and Mdust ×κ1mm. Considering both this degeneracy and uncertainties of the observational data, the total absolute uncertainties are ap- proximately 0.2 − 0.3 for β and a factor of ≈ 3 and ≈ 4 for Mdust × κ1mm for the spatially resolved and unmapped disks respectively. These uncertainties are mainly due to the adopted ranges for Rout (listed in Table 4) and p be- tween 0.5 and 1.5, whose values determine the impact of the optically thick regions of the disk to the total emission, as explained in Section 3. The estimates for β and Mdust × κ1mm obtained by our analysis are reported in Table 5. 4.1. Spectral slopes and dust opacity index Before analysing the values of β, which provide information on the level of grain growth in the outer disk regions, it is important to check whether our results could be affected by detection biases: indeed, for a given flux at ∼ 1mm, a disk with large dust grains in the outer parts will produce a stronger emission at ∼ 3 mm than a disk with a population of smaller-sized grains and be easier to detect. In Figure 5 the grey region of the plot indicates the area in the (F1mm, α1−3mm) plane in which the observations carried out so far are not sensitive, due to the sensitivity limits obtained at 1 and 3 mm. While we could investigate the dust properties for 4 disks with 15 mJy < F1mm < 30 mJy, the plot shows that a disk with a 1 mm flux in this same range, but with a spectral index α1−3mm > ∼ 3.2, consistent with a disk model with ISM-like dust and an outer radius of ∼ 100 AU, would not be detected at 3 mm. Nevertheless, we want to point out that only 2 of our 16 targets with F1mm < 100 mJy were not detected at 3mm, and both have very weak F1.3mm fluxes (upper limits of 27 mJy and 21 mJy for DP Tau and GK Tau respectively, Andrews & Williams 2005), therefore the lack of disks with α ∼ 3.2 at F1mm > 30 mJy does not seem to be due to our sensitivity limit but is most likely real. Furthermore, as evident from the same plot, the 6 faintest disks, with F1mm < 60 mJy, show a spectral index between 1 and 3 mm that is lower on average (2.08 ± 0.08) than for the brighter disks (2.40 ± 0.06). This is the reason of the discrepancy of the average value of the dust opacity is optically thick and thus depends on the properties of the dust grains located in the surface layers of the inner disk regions. The aim of our analysis is instead to probe the optically thin disk emission in order to investigate the dust properties in the disk midplane. 7 Note that, according to the adopted disk model, after fix- ing the stellar parameters, and these two quantities from the observed SED, the midplane temperature is well constrained. Table 4. Adopted disks outer radii. Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga 9 Object AA Tau CI Tau CW Tau CX Tau CY Tau DE Tau DL Tau DM Tau DN Tau DO Tau DR Tau DS Tau FM Tau FZ Tau GM Aur GO Tau HO Tau IQ Tau RY Tau SU Aur UZ Tau E Ra out (K02) Ra (AU) g (I09) Adopted Rout−interval (AU) (AU) out (AW07) Rb (AU) 214+63 −51 ... ... ... 211 ± 28 ... 152+28 −27 220 ± 47 147 ± 469 98 ± 52 193 ± 141 ... ... ... 151+63 −29 ... ... 329+403 −70 81 ± 128 ... ... 400+600 −75 225 ± 50 ... ... ... ... 175+50 −25 150+250 −100 100+300 −25 ... 100+175 −25 ... ... ... 150 ± 25 350+650 −175 ... ... 150 ± 25 ... ... ... ... ... ... 230 ... ... 160 125 ... 90 ... ... ... 270 160 ... ... 115 ... 160 200 − 400 150 − 250 100 − 300 100 − 300 230 − 330 100 − 300 150 − 250 160 − 260 125 − 225 100 − 200 90 − 190 100 − 300 100 − 300 100 − 300 270 − 370 160 − 260 100 − 300 250 − 400 115 − 215 100 − 300 160 − 260 a) Rout listed here results from image fitting using a truncated power-law for the surface density profile. K02: Kitamura et al. (2002); AW07: Andrews & Williams (2007). b) Rg is the radius within which the 95% of the source flux is observed, after fitting the visibility of the source with a gaussian; we used this value, when available, as a lower limit for our adopted Rout-interval. I09: Isella et al. (2009). spectral index < β > between unmapped and resolved disks (see discussion below). In Figure 3 we plot κ1mm and β as functions of amax for different values of q. One interesting result is that the values of β obtained for the objects in our sample by the SED-fitting procedure are all less than or equal to 1, which can be explained only if dust grains with sizes larger than 1 mm are present in the disk. For the 9 sources with β ≤ 0.5, the largest dust grains must have grown to sizes ≥ 1 cm according to our dust model. If we let q assume values lower than 2.5, thus increasing the fractional number of the larger grains, the maximum grain size decreases, but amax >∼ 1 mm for β <∼ 1 is still needed. The estimates of the maximum grain sizes amax depend on the dust model that one adopts. If we consider for ex- ample the dust model adopted in Natta et al. (2004) (5% olivine, 15% organic materials, 35% water ice and 50% vac- uum), the estimates for amax are greater by about an order of magnitude than the ones obtained with our dust model. In general, no realistic dust grain models result in β < 1 for amax < 1 mm. Here it is worthwhile to remember that, whereas for the 13 resolved disks in our sample β is well determined, for the 8 disks for which we do not have information on their spatial extension, the optically thick parts of a possible compact disk could significantly contribute to the emission. If that is the case, no conclusions on the dust grain properties could be drawn. In particular, for the 6 unmapped disks with α ≈ 1.9 − 2.2 (CX Tau, DS Tau, FM Tau, FZ Tau, HO Tau, SU Aur) a very compact disk with Rout ≈ 20 AU, a relative high inclination i ≈ 70o, and with ISM-like dust grains would fit the sub-mm/mm SED. For the other 2 unmapped sources, DE Tau (α ≈ 2.4) and CW Tau (α ≈ 2.5), ISM- like dust grains are consistent with the sub-mm/mm data using a disk model with i ≈ 70o and Rout ≈ 30, 40 AU respectively. For the faintest disks, the outer radius has to be small because if the disks were larger they would also need to be more massive in order to keep being optically thick, thus producing an α value close to 2 with all the possible dust properties. In that case, they would emit more sub-mm/mm-wave radiation than observed. Since, for an optically thick disk, decreasing the inclination angle has the effect of making the SED steeper (because the central, hotter parts are less obscured), for disks with i < 70o the outer radii would need to be even smaller to fit the SED. Since these disk outer radii are lower by factors of 2 − 4 10 Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga Fig. 3. Millimeter dust opacity for the adopted dust model. Left top panel: dust opacity at 1 mm as function of amax for a grain size distribution n(a) ∝ a−q between amin = 0.1 µm and amax. Different curves are for different values of q, as labelled. The dust grains adopted here are porous composite spheres made of astronomical silicates (≈ 10% in volume), carbonaceous materials (≈ 20%) and water ice (≈ 30%; see text for the references to the optical constants). Left bottom panel: β between 1 and 3 mm as a function of amax for the same grain distributions. Right panel: dust opacity at 1 mm as function of β between 1 and 3 mm for the same grain distributions; different iso-amax curves for amax = 0.1, 1, 10 cm are shown. In the plots the unit of measure for the dust opacity is cm2 per gram of dust. the unmmapped sources are compact, optically-thick disks with unprocessed ISM grains. For AA Tau, which is the faintest of the mapped sources (F1mm ≈ 100 mJy) and has a low spectral index of α ≈ 2.0 typical of fainter sources, the maps indicate a disk radius of 200 − 400 AU ruling out the possibility of optically thick disk regions dominating the total emission, and requiring a low β of 0.3 to explain the shallow slope. ∼ 0.8, values of q > Also, only for the disks with β > ∼ 3.5 are consistent with the data (see right panel in Figure 3), in which case amax ≥ 10 cm. This is in good agreement with the following consideration using the approximated asyn- thotic formula β ≈ (q − 3)βRJ , derived by Draine (2006), where βRJ is the opacity spectral index of the solid material in the Rayleigh limit, and valid for a population of grains with 3 < q < 4 and amin ≪ ac ≪ amax, with ac being a function of the real and imaginary parts of the complex di- electric function and wavelength (at millimeter wavelengths ac ∼ 1 mm). Since, at a fixed q, the function β(amax) de- creases when amax >∼ 1 mm (see Figure 3), it follows that the approximated asynthotic value (q − 3)βRJ gives a lower limit for β at a finite amax. Adopting βRJ = 1.7 from the small dust grains in the ISM, for q >∼ 3.5 we derive β >∼ 0.85, i.e. dust grains populations with q > ∼ 3.5 cannot explain β- values lower than ≈ 0.858. In Figure 6 we report the histogram of the β-values derived by our analysis. The average value in our sample considering both unmapped and resolved disks, < β >= 0.6 ± 0.06, is not consistent with dust populations with q- values of 3.5, like for the ISM, or greater. Values of q lower than 3.5 have been obtained by, e.g., Tanaka et al. (2005) from simulations of grain growth in stratified protoplane- tary disks which give vertically integrated size distributions 8 Note that β-values greater than ≈ 0.85 can be explained by both q <∼ 3.5 and q >∼ 3.5. Fig. 5. Spectral index α between 1 and 3 mm plotted against the flux at 1 mm from the model best fits shown in Figure 4. The points plotted here are listed in the first two columns of Table 5. Open blue points represent the spatially resolved disks, whereas the filled red points are for the unmapped ones. A value of α consistent with a disk model with ISM-like dust and an outer radius of ∼ 100 AU is indicated as a dashed horizontal line. The grey region shows the area in the plot that is unexplored because of the 3σ sensitivity limits of our new and past millimeter ob- servations (here considered as 15 mJy and 1.0 mJy at 1 and 3 mm respectively). than the smallest disks that have been spatially resolved so far, and since for all the 13 resolved disks the values of β have been found always much lower than in the ISM (βISM ≈ 1.7, see Figure 6), thus showing clear evidence of grain growth, we consider very unlikely that many of Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga 11 Fig. 4. Fits of the sub-mm/mm SEDs with the two-layer flared disk models (solid lines). Note that even if the data at 7 mm, available only for 8 disks in our sample, are present in the plots, they have not been used in the fitting procedure (see Section 2.5). The errorbars in the plots take into account an uncertainty of 10% on the absolute flux scale, typical for flux measurements at these wavelengths. The circled data come from the new PdBI observations. The fitting values of the spectral index α and of the dust opacity spectral index β between 1 and 3 mm are indicated in the bottom left corner of each plot. The value of the surface density power-law index p adopted in these fits is 1, and the adopted value for the outer disk radius is listed in Table 5. with q ≈ 3, plus a population of much larger bodies, to which however our observations would not be sensitive. These considerations clearly suggest that the process of dust grain growth to mm-sizes has played a fundamental role in most, if not all, of the Taurus-Auriga protoplane- tary disks whose sub-mm/mm SED has been sufficiently investigated. From Figure 6 it is also evident that the two sub-samples made of unmapped and resolved disks separately have dif- ferent averaged β values, with the β values being on av- erage lower for the unmapped disks than for the resolved ones (< β >= 0.41 ± 0.10, 0.68 ± 0.06 for the unmapped and resolved disks respectively). Since the unmapped sam- ple nearly coincides with the fainter disks with F1mm < 100 mJy, and since β is correlated with the spectral index α, this is due to the trend already presented in Figure 5 be- tween F1mm and α1−3mm. This trend agrees with simple expectations for grain growth: as the maximum grain size 12 Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga Table 5. Disk properties. Object namea Rb out (AU) F c 1mm (mJy) α1−3mm β1−3mm Mdust × κ1mm (M⊙× cm2g−1) M q=2.5 dust (M⊙) M q=3 dust (M⊙) M q=3.5 dust (M⊙) AA Tau CI Tau CW Tau CX Tau CY Tau DE Tau DL Tau DM Tau DN Tau DO Tau DR Tau DS Tau FM Tau FZ Tau GM Aur GO Tau HO Tau IQ Tau RY Tau SU Aur UZ Tau E 300 200 200 200 280 200 200 210 175 150 140 200 200 200 320 210 200 325 165 200 210 108 314 129 19 168 69 313 209 153 220 298 28 29 27 423 151 36 118 383 50 333 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.7 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.6 2.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.5 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.0 0.5 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.7 2.8 · 10−4 7.9 · 10−4 3.2 · 10−4 5.7 · 10−5 6.0 · 10−4 1.6 · 10−4 8.4 · 10−4 9.2 · 10−4 3.5 · 10−4 4.9 · 10−4 6.6 · 10−4 6.2 · 10−5 6.5 · 10−5 5.0 · 10−5 1.4 · 10−3 6.3 · 10−4 1.7 · 10−4 3.4 · 10−4 5.1 · 10−4 5.0 · 10−5 6.1 · 10−4 1.5 · 10−4 1.1 · 10−4 4.2 · 10−5 1.2 · 10−5 1.3 · 10−4 2.4 · 10−5 1.3 · 10−4 1.0 · 10−4 7.7 · 10−5 1.4 · 10−4 7.4 · 10−5 4.0 · 10−5 6.0 · 10−5 3.2 · 10−5 1.6 · 10−4 7.1 · 10−5 3.7 · 10−5 7.4 · 10−5 1.1 · 10−4 3.2 · 10−5 9.6 · 10−5 1.5 · 10−3 1.2 · 10−4 4.4 · 10−5 1.9 · 10−5 2.0 · 10−4 2.8 · 10−5 1.5 · 10−4 1.0 · 10−4 1.2 · 10−4 3.1 · 10−4 7.2 · 10−5 1.1 · 10−3 1.7 · 10−3 9.0 · 10−4 1.5 · 10−4 6.9 · 10−5 5.6 · 10−5 1.1 · 10−4 1.7 · 10−4 9.0 · 10−4 1.1 · 10−4 ... 5.0 · 10−4 1.9 · 10−4 ... ... ... ... 1.6 · 10−4 ... ... 1.2 · 10−4 ... ... ... 2.5 · 10−4 1.1 · 10−4 ... ... ... ... ... a) Underlined objects are those that have not been mapped to date through high-angular resolution imaging. b) Central value of the adopted Rout-interval reported in Table 4. This is the value used to extract the other quantities listed in the Table. c) Source flux density at 1 mm from the best fit disk model described in Section 3. amax increases, both β and κ1mm decrease, so disks with the same dust mass should become fainter as β gets smaller. Alternatively, the F1mm-α1−3mm trend could arise if the fainter disks are smaller, and then more optically thick, than the brighter, resolved ones, while their "true" β would be nearly the same. In Figure 7 we show the β vs stellar age plot. No ev- idence of an evolutionary trend is present over the large range of stellar ages spanned by our sample. As already discussed the determination of the individual ages of PMS stars is very uncertain. Hartmann (2001) has shown that the large age spread deduced for T Tauri stars in Taurus may just be the result of uncertainties in the measurements towards individual members of a population with a very narrow age spread. Our most solid conclusion, not affected by the age determination uncertainties, is that most (if not all) of the Class II YSO in our sample show evidence of evolved grains in the disk outer regions. 4.2. Grain growth These results confirm two statements that have been ad- dressed in the last years. The first one is that the dust coagulation from ISM dust to mm/cm-sized grains is a fast process, that appears to occur before a YSO enters in the Class II evolutionary stage, i.e. when a dense envelope still surrounds the protostar+disk system. This is also consis- tent with the recent results by Kwon et al. (2009) who have found evidence of grain growth in 3 Class 0 YSOs in Perseus and Cepheus through CARMA observations at 1.3 and 2.7 mm. The second statement is that the mm/cm-sized dust grains appear to stay longer in the outer disk if com- pared with their expected inward drift timescale due to the interaction with the gas component. In a circum- stellar disk the gas experiences a pressure gradient force which cancels a part of the central star's gravity and in- duces a rotation slower than the Keplerian velocity. Dust grains, whose orbits are hardly affected by gas pressure, are assumed to be rotating with Keplerian velocity, and thus experience a headwind. They lose angular momentum and spiral inward to the central star (Adachi et al. 1976, Weidenschilling 1977). Takeuchi & Lin (2005) proposed as possible solutions to the drift problem that either the grain growth process from mm-sized to cm-sized grains is very long in the outer regions of the disk (timescales greater than Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga 13 cal orbital decay time for a cm-sized grain with a density of 0.1 g cm−3 at 50 AU is ≈ 105 yr (104 yr for a more compact grain with a 1 g cm−3 density), to explain the presence of cm-sized grains in the older disks in our sample (with ages of few Myrs and up to ∼ 107 yr) the reservoir of larger bod- ies would have to contain at least 100 times more mass than the observed dust mass. The total disk mass would then be comparable to or even exceeding the estimated stellar mass (using a standard gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100, see Section 4.3). To solve the drift problem for very low and very high disk masses Brauer et al. (2007) proposed a significant re- duction of the drag experienced by the dust due to a reduc- tion of the gas-to-dust ratio in the disk from the canonical value of 100, and to possible collective effects of dust gath- ering in a thin midplane layer in the case of very-low tur- bulent disks. For example, using a low value for the turbu- lence parameter α = 10−6 and a gas-to-dust ratio of 5, they find that cm-sized dust grains remain in the outer parts of the disk for more than 2 Myr if disk masses < 0.05 M⋆ or > 0.2 M⋆ are considered. In the range Mdisk ≈ 0.05−0.2 M⋆ the collective effects of dust are not efficient enough to re- tain cm-sized grains in the disk outer regions. If the disk is more turbulent, then more gas has to be removed in order to keep the particles in the outer parts for a longer period of time. To justify such small gas-to-dust ratios tha authors suggest the process of photoevaporation as the main driver of gas removal. However, in this case, since photoevapo- ration is expected to manifest only in the later stages of disk evolution, then we would expect a strong evolutionary trend of β, which is instead not found by our analysis. Another possibility is the presence in the disk of local gas pressure maxima that would block the inward drift of the dust grains. As shown by the dynamics calculation of Barge & Sommeria (1995) and Klahr & Henning (1997) this mechanism may provide a solution also to the relative veloc- ity fragmentation barrier that prevents meter-sized bodies to further grow in size in the inner regions of the disk. 4.3. Dust mass From the sub-mm/mm SED fitting procedure we derived the quantity Mdust × κ1mm. To obtain the dust mass in the disks an estimate of κ1mm is needed. The choice of the dust opacity at 1 mm creates the largest uncertainty in the derivation of (dust) disk masses from millimeter observa- tions. Estimates of κ1mm from different dust models in the literature span a range of a factor greater than 10. The most commonly used value in the literature is κ1mm ≃ 3 cm2 per gram of dust (Beckwith et al. 1990) that, for sim- plicity, is supposed to be constant, i.e. independent of the dust grain properties, for all the disks. As noted in Natta et al. (2004) this is not realistic as grain growth affects both the frequency dependence of the dust opacity and its absolute value (e.g. Miyake & Nakagawa 1993). In this paper we use the dust model described in Section 3.1 to get an estimate of κ1mm that takes into account the dust physical properties, expecially grain growth. As shown in the left top panel of Figure 3, at a fixed value of the grain size distribution index q, the value of κ1mm can be inferred from amax which in turn can be derived from β through the relation plotted in the left bottom panel of the same figure. The relation between κ1mm and β is shown in the right panel. Therefore, from an estimate of β and Mdust × κ1mm Fig. 6. Distribution of the dust opacity spectral index β for the disks in our sample. In blue the values for the spatially resolved disks are indicated, whereas the red is for the un- mapped ones. The average β value for all the sources in our sample (black), for the unmapped sources only (red), for the resolved sources only (blue), and the value of 1.7 for the ISM dust are indicated as dashed vertical lines. Fig. 7. Beta versus age: relationship between the dust opac- ity spectral index β and the estimated stellar age obtained as in Section 2.3. Open blue points represent the spatially resolved disks, whereas the filled red points are for the un- mapped ones. The β value for the ISM dust is indicated as a dashed horizontal line. 1 Myr, e.g. given by grains' sticking probability as low as 0.1) or that grains have already grown to 10 m or larger and they do not migrate rapidly anymore, and mm-sized parti- cles are continuosly replenished through collisions of these large bodies. However our analysis suggests that, unless the grain size distribution index is very low, i.e. q < 2.5, disks with β < ∼ 0.5 show evidence of grains as large as ∼ 1 cm in the outer regions. Also, as already pointed out in Natta et al. (2004) and Brauer et al. (2007), a noteworthy amount of larger bodies, which would not contribute to the disk emis- sion because of their negligibly small opacity coefficient, could significantly increase the disk masses. Since the typi- 14 Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga obtained by the sub-mm/mm SED fitting procedure we can get an estimate for κ1mm and then the dust mass Mdust for our dust model, after fixing the q parameter. In Table 5 we report the values of Mdust as obtained with this method for q = 2.5, 3.0, 3.5. It is important to bear in mind that, as for the estimate of the maximum grain size, also for κ1mm, and thus for the dust mass, the estimates depend on the specific dust model that one adopts (see discussion in Natta et al. 2004). However, following Isella et al. (2009), we take into account the variation of the dust opacity with β using a well defined dust model to infer dust masses, and this approach is more accurate than considering a fixed κ1mm as often done in previous studies. dust dust dust dust < M q=3 dust < M q=3.5 dust dust and M q=3 and M q=3 is greater than M q=2.5 In general, for our specific dust model, when β < 1 then M q=2.5 , the amount of variation of M q dust for the different q values being dependent on β. In particular, when β ≃ 0.8 − 1 M q=2.5 dust are nearly coincident and M q=3.5 by factors of ∼ 2 − 4. For β <∼ 0.7 a grain size distribution with q = 3.5 cannot explain the observational data and the discrepancy between M q=2.5 dust increases up to a factor of ∼ 15 when β ≃ 0.2. This is due to the increase of the distance between the κ1mm(β) curves at fixed q-values, when β decreases, as shown in the right panel of Figure 3 As already mentioned in Section 4.1, from the value of β it is impossible to disentangle amax and q. Nevertheless, only the disks showing β ≥ 0.8 can be explained by a grain size distribution index q = 3.5. For this reason, for the rest of our analysis we will consider separately only the cases in which the dust grain size distribution is characterized by q = 2.5 or 3. The value of q in protoplanetary disks is unknown and it is not observationally constrainable, and so it is in principle possible that it can vary substantially from one disk to the other. For our discussion we will use the assumption that q is the same for all the disks. Once the dust mass is estimated, this is commonly con- verted into an estimate of the total disk mass (dust+gas) using the standard ISM gas-to-dust ratio of 100. However, if the dust and gas components have different evolutionary timescales, this ratio is a function of time and the stan- dard ISM value would be inappropriate for estimating the disk mass at the present time. Physical processes that are likely to alter this ratio during the evolution of a proto- planetary disk are gas photo-evaporation, which would lead to a decrease of the gas-to-dust ratio (unless a significant amount of dust is dragged away by the gas flow), and dust inward migration, which instead would increase it. Natta et al. (2004) suggested that the standard ISM ratio provides a correct estimate of the "original" disk mass, when the disk composition reflected that of the parent cloud. However, this is true only if a negligible amount of dust has migrated with respect to the gas and accreted onto the central star, otherwise the ISM ratio would provide only a lower limit to the original disk mass. Because of our ignorance on the gas-to-dust ratio evolution in this paper we will not convert the dust mass into a total disk mass. Also, it is important to note that since millimeter observations are insensitive to the emission of bodies much larger than 1 cm, including planetesimals and planets, the dust mass we are referring to in this paper does not include the contribution from these larger objects. The dust mass is intended to be the mass in "small grains" only, and is a lower limit to the total mass in dust. Figure 8 shows the β vs Mdust plots for q equal to 2.5 and 3. The plot with q = 2.5 does not show any signifi- cant relation. In the q = 3 case an anticorrelation between these two quantities may be present, with the more massive dust disks being associated to the ones showing today the largest grains in their outer parts, with amax up to ∼ 10 cm. This possible anticorrelation is clearly an effect of the choice of a physical model for the dust that takes into ac- count the variation of the dust opacity normalization factor with the size-distribution of the dust grains (Section 3.1). If we had made the unrealistic assumption of a constant value for the dust opacity at, say, 1 mm, we would have found an opposite result, i.e. disks with less mass in dust would have shown on average larger grains, as can be de- rived from Figure 5, since α is approximately proportional to β and F1mm would be approximately proportional to the dust mass, in the constant κ1mm case. More realisti- cally, lower values of β imply low absolute values of the dust millimeter opacity (see right panel of Figure 3), so that, for a fixed observed flux and disk temperature, the corresponding dust mass must be larger. The reason why the plot with q = 2.5 does not show signs of anticorrela- tion is that at a fixed β a lower q value is associated to a smaller dust grain maximum size. The β range spanned by the disks in our sample translates into a range in κ1mm that is narrower for q = 2.5 than it is for q = 3 (see right panel of Figure 3), thus leading to smaller correction factors with respect to the constant κ1mm case. Note that among the 5 disks showing the smallest β (≈ 0.2 − 0.3) and the highest dust masses (about 10−3 M⊙ for q = 3) only one (AA Tau) has been mapped and spatially resolved. High angular res- olution and high sensitivity imaging of these disks together with other ones are needed to test the robustness of the β − Mdisk,init anticorrelation in the q = 3 case. Figure 9 and 10 plot the disk mass in dust against the estimated mass of the central star (dust mass obtained with q-values of 2.5 and 3) and mass accretion rate (dust mass with q = 3 and stellar ages smaller and greater than 2 Myr) respectively. In the 0.3 − 2 M⊙ range in stellar mass the dust mass does not show any trend (for q = 2.5: 3 · 10−5 < Mdust < 2 · 10−4M⊙; for q = 2.5: 4 · 10−5 < Mdisk,init < 2 · 10−3M⊙). The two YSOs with M⋆ <∼ 0.3 M⊙ have lower dust masses than all the other YSOs for both q = 2.5 and 3. However, the range in stellar mass spanned by our sample is rather limited, and partic- ularly biased toward YSOs with late-K and early-M spec- tral types. From the upper limits obtained at 1.3 mm by Schaefer et al. (2009) for 14 T-Tauri stars with spectral types later than ≈ M2 (F1.3mm < ∼ 5 − 20 mJy), and from the detection of very low disk masses around sub-stellar objects in Taurus-Auriga (Klein et al. 2003, Scholz et al. 2006), it is likely that a correlation between the disk mass in dust and the mass of the central star exists. High sensitivity millime- ter observations are needed to constrain the disk masses in dust around very low mass PMS stars. In Figure 10 a trend of higher mass accretion rates for the more massive disks in dust may be present in the data but still the scatter is very large (a similar result is obtained for the q = 2.5 case). Other relations between the dust properties (β, dust mass) and the stellar ones (e.g. stellar luminosity, effective temperature) have been investigated but no significant cor- relations have been found. Finally, we have compared the values of β obtained in this paper with the ones derived in Natta et al. (2004) for Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga 15 Fig. 8. Dust opacity spectral index β and maximum grain size amax plotted against the disk mass in dust for the sources in our sample. In the left and right panels the dust mass has been obtained adopting a value of 2.5 and 3 respectively for the power index q of the dust grains size distribution. Open blue points represent the spatially resolved disks, whereas the filled red points are for the unmapped ones. The errorbars in the dust mass estimates do not take into account our uncertainty on the real value of q. Fig. 9. Disk mass in dust plotted against the stellar mass for the sources in our sample. In the left and right panels the dust mass has been obtained adopting a value of 2.5 and 3 respectively for the power index q of the dust grains size distribution. The stellar mass has been estimated as described in Section 2.3, and the errorbars take into account the range of values given by different PMS stars evolutionary models. Open blue points represent the spatially resolved disks, whereas the filled red points are for the unmapped ones. The errorbars in the dust mass estimates do not take into account our uncertainty on the real value of q. a sample of 6 intermediate mass Herbig Ae stars and 3 lower mass T Tauri stars. From the two-sided Kolmogorov- Smirnov test, the probability that the β values from the two samples come from the same distribution is about 88%, in- dicating that the disks in the two samples have similar dust properties in terms of grain growth (in the Natta et al. 2004 sample only one object, the Herbig Ae star HD150193, has a relatively high β = 1.6±0.2, compatible with non-evolved ISM-like dust grains). 5. Summary We have analysed the sub-mm/mm SED out to 3mm of a sample of 21 Class II T-Tauri stars in the Taurus-Auriga star forming region. This sample comprises about the 60% of the "isolated" class II YSOs with an estimated stellar mass greater than ≈ 0.4 M⊙. It also comprises approxi- mately 1/3 of the isolated class II wich have been observed at 0.85mm to have a flux less than 100 mJy, for which we provide first 3mm detections thanks to sensitive PdBI ob- servations. Our main findings are summarized below: 1. For all the sources in our sample the millimeter opacity spectral index β is significantly lower than the value 16 Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga Fig. 10. Disk mass in dust plotted against the mass accretion rate for the sources in our sample. In the left and right panels we included the objects with estimated ages of less and more than 2 Myr respectively. The dust mass has been obtained adopting a value of 3 for the power index q of the dust grains size distribution. The stellar mass accretion rate has been estimated following the method described in Section 2.4. Open blue points represent the spatially resolved disks, whereas the filled red points are for the unmapped ones. The errorbars in the mass accretion rate take into account the typical intrinsic time-variability of the accretion rates. The errorbars in the dust mass estimates do not include our uncertainty on the actual value of q. obtained for the dust in the ISM. For the 13 spatially resolved disks this is a clear evidence of the presence in the outer disk regions of dust grains as large as at least 1 mm. For the 8 unmapped sources, assuming disk outer radii comparable to the resolved sources low β values are found as well, suggesting that even for these fainter sources 1 mm-sized grains are in the disk outer regions. This confirms, over a larger sample and less massive disks, the results obtained by past observations on T- Tauri stars (e.g. Rodmann et al. 2006 and references therein). 2. No significant evidence of an evolutionary trend for the millimeter opacity spectral index β has been found. This indicates that the dust grain growth to ∼ 1 mm-sizes is a very fast process in a protoplanetary disk, that appears to occur before a YSO enters in the Class II evolutionary stage. Also, the amount of these large grains in the disk outer regions does not appear to decline throughout all the Class II evolutionary stage. 3. Only for 9 sources in our sample a power law index for the grain size distribution of the ISM, qISM ≈ 3.5, is consistent with the sub/mm-mm SED. Instead, most of the disks show evidence of a smaller q−value. 4. We have not found any significant correlation between the dust properties, namely grain growth and dust mass in the disk outer regions, and the properties of the cen- tral star, including the mass accretion rate onto the stel- lar surface. However, our sample contains mostly YSOs with a narrow range in spectral types, namely between late-K and early-M, and it is possible that a correlation between the disk mass in dust and the stellar mass will become apparent when considering also disks around late-M spectral types. 5. The 6 faintest sources in our sample, with F1mm < 50 mJy, show a spectral index between 1 and 3 mm that is on average lower than the spectral index of the brighter sources. This may indicate either that for these fainter, yet unmapped disks the emission from the optically thick inner disk is much more significant than for the brighter sources or that the dust grains in the outer regions of these fainter disks are even larger than in the brighter YSOs, possibly up to 10 cm if q = 3. The latter hypothesis would imply on average a lower abso- lute value for the millimeter opacity coefficient for these fainter disks. Taking into account this effect through a physical model for the dust properties, we found, in the case of a value for the power index of the grain size distribution q = 3, an anticorrelation between β and the disk dust mass, that would indicate that larger dust grains are found in the outer parts of the more massive disks (in dust). In the next future, with the advent of the next sub- mm/mm facilities (both new interferometers like ALMA and technical improvements in the existent arrays, like for example the E-VLA) it will be possible to extend the in- vestigation of the dust properties to fainter circumstellar disks around the lowest mass PMS stars and brown dwarfs. Furthermore, thanks to the great enhancements in both high angular resolution and sensitivity that these facilities will provide, it will be possible to determine their spatial extension. Acknowledgements. We thank the anonymous referee for his/her comments that greatly improved the manuscript. L.R. acknowledges the PhD fellowship of the International Max Planck Research School. References Adachi, I., Hayashi, C., & Nakazawa, K. 1976, Prog. Theor. Phys. 56, 1756 Adams, F. C., Emerson, J. P., & Fuller, G. A. 1990, ApJ 357, 606 Altenhoff, W. J., Thum, C., & Wendker, H. J. 1994, A&A 281, 161 Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., Qi, C., & Dullemond, C. P. 2009, ApJ 700, 1502 Andrews, S. M., & Williams, J. P. 2007, ApJ 659, 705 Ricci et al.: Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus-Auriga 17 Andrews, S. M., & Williams, J. P. 2005, ApJ 631, 1134 Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F. & Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, A&A 337, 403 Barge, P., & Sommeria, J. 1995, A&A 295, L1 Beckwith, S. V. W., Sargent, A. I., Chini, R. S., & Guesten, R. 1990, AJ 99, 924 Beckwith, S. V. W., & Sargent, A. I. 1991, ApJ 381, 250 Bertout, C., Robichon, N., & Arenou, F. 1999, A&A 352, 574 Bessell, M. S., & Brett J. M. 1988, PASP 100, 1134 Brauer, F., Dullemond, C. P., Johansen, A. , et al. 2007, A&A 469, 1169 Bouwman, J., Meeus, G., de Koter, A., Hony, S., Dominik, C., & Waters, L. B. F. M. 2001, A&A 375, 950 Briceno, C., Hartmann, L., Stauffer, J. R., & Martin, E. L. 1998, AJ 115, 2074 Padgett, D. L., Brandner, W., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Strom, S. E., Terebey, S., & Koerner, D. 1999, AJ 117, 1490 Palla, F., & Stahler, S. W. 1999, ApJ 525, 772 Pinte, C., Fouchet, L., M´enard, F., Gonzalez, J.-F., & Duchene, G. 2007, A&A 469, 963 Pollack, J. B., Hollenbach, D., Beckwith, S., Simonelli, D. P., Roush, T., & Fong, W. 1994, ApJ 421, 615 Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. 1996, Icarus 124, 62 Hollenbach, D., Beckwith, S., Simonelli, D. P., Roush, T., & Fong, W. 1994, ApJ 421, 615 Reipurth, B., & Zinnecker, H. 1993, A&A 278, 81 Rieke, G. H., & Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, ApJ 288, 618 Rodmann, J., Henning, T., Chandler, C. J., Mundy, L. G., & Wilner, D. J. 2006, A&A 446, 211 Briceno, C., Luhman, K. L., Hartmann L., Stauffer, J. R., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. 2002, ApJ 580, 317 Safronov, V. S., & Zvjagina, E. V. 1969, Icarus 10, 109 Schaefer, G. H., Dutrey, A., Guilloteau, S., Simon, M., & White, R. Calvet, N., Muzerolle, J., Briceno, C., Hernndez, J., Hartmann, L., J. 2009, ApJ, 710, 698 Saucedo, J. L., & Gordon, K. D. 2004, AJ 128, 1294 Schmidt-Kaler T. 1982, in Landolt-BornsteinGroup VI, Vol. 2, ed. Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A., & K.-H. Hellwege (Berlin: Springer), 454 Scholz, A., Jayawardhana, R., & Wood, K. 2006, ApJ 645, 1498 Simon, M., & Prato, L. 1995, ApJ 450, 824 Simon, M., Chen, W.-P., Howell, R. R., Benson, J. A., & Slowick, D. 1992, ApJ 384, 212 Takeuchi, T., & Lin, D. N. C. 2005, ApJ 623, 482 Tanaka, H., Himeno, Y., & Ida, S. 2005, ApJ 625, 414 Testi, L., Natta, A., Shepherd, D. S., & Wilner, D. J. 2001, ApJ 554, 1087 Testi, L., Natta, A., Shepherd, D. S., & Wilner, D. J. 2003, A&A 403, 323 Throop, H. B., Bally, J., Esposito, L. W., & McCaughrean, M. J. 2001, Science 292, 1686 Valenti, J. A., Basri, G., & Johns, C. M. 1993, AJ 106, 2024 Warren, S. G. 1984, ApOpt 23, 1206 Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, MNRAS 180, 57 Weingartner, J. C., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ 548, 296 Wilner, D. J., Ho, P. T. P., Kastner, J. H., & Rodr´ıguez, L. F. 2000, ApJ 534, L101 Zubko, V. G., Mennella, V., Colangeli, L., & Bussoletti, E. 1996, MNRAS 282, 1321 Sitko, M. 2002, ApJ 568, 1008 Calvet, N., & Gullbring, E. 1998, ApJ 509, 802 Carpenter, J. M. 2001, AJ 121, 2851 Chiang, E. I., & Goldreich, P. 1997 ApJ 490, 368 Cutri, R. M. et al. 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources Davies, D. R. & Ryan, E. V. 1990, Icarus 83, 156 Draine, B. T. & Lee, H.-M. 1984, ApJ 285, 89 Draine, B. T. 2006, ApJ 636, 1114 Dullemond, C. P., Dominik, C., & Natta, A. 2001, ApJ 560, 957 Dutrey, A., Guilloteau, S., Duvert, G., et al. 1996, A&A, 309, 493 Gullbring, E., Calvet, N., Muzerolle, J., & Hartmann, L. 2000, ApJ 544, 927 Gullbring, E., Hartmann, L., Briceno, C., & Calvet, N. 1998, ApJ 492, 323 Hartigan, P., & Kenyon, S. J. 2003, ApJ, 583, 334 Hartmann, L. 2001, AJ, 121, 1030 Herczeg, C. J., & Hillenbrand L. A. 2008, ApJ 681, 594 Herczeg, C. J., et al. 2009, in preparation Hughes, M. A., Wilner, D. J., Qi, C., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2008, ApJ 678, 1119 Isella, A., Carpenter, J. M., & Sargent, A. F. 2009, ApJ 701, 260 Itoh, Y., et al. 2009, ApJ 620, 984 Jensen, E. L. N., Dhital, S., Stassun, K. G., Patience, J., Herbst, W., Walter, F. M., Simon, M., & Basri, G. 2007, AJ, 134, 241 Jensen, E. L. N., Koerner, D. W., & Mathieu, R.D. 1996, AJ, 111, 2431 Kenyon, S. J., & Hartmann L. 1995, ApJS 101, 117 Kessler-Silacci, J.; Augereau, J. C.; Dullemond, C. P., Geers, V., Lahuis, F., et al. 2006, ApJ 639, 275 Kitamura, Y., Momose, M., Yokogawa, S., et al. 2002, ApJ 581, 357 Klahr, H. H., & Henning, T. 1997, Icarus, 128, 213 Klein, R., Apai, D., Pascucci, I., Henning, Th., & Waters, L. B. F. M. 2003, ApJ 593, 57 Koerner, D. W., Chandler, C. J., & Sargent, A. I. 1995, ApJ 452, 69 Kwon, W., Looney, L. W., Mundy, L. G., Chiang H., & Kemball, A. 2009, ApJ 696, 841 Leggett, S. K. 1992, ApJS 82, 351 Leinert, C., Zinnecker, H., Weitzel, N., Christou, J., Ridgway, S. T., Jameson, R., Haas, M., & Lenzen, R. 1993, A&A 278, 129 Lommen, D., Maddison, S. T., Wright, C. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., Wilner, D. J., & Bourke, T. L. 2009, A&A 495, 869 Lommen, D., Wright, C. M., Maddison, S. T., Jrgensen, J. K., Bourke, T. L., van Dishoeck, E. F., Hughes, A., Wilner, D. J., Burton, M., & van Langevelde, H. J. 2007, A&A 462, 211 Luhman, K. L. 1999, ApJ 525, 466 Malfait, K., Waelkens, C., Waters, L. B. F. M., Vandenbussche, B., Huygen, E., & de Graauw, M. S. 1998, A&A 332, 25 Mannings, V., & Emerson, J. P. 1994, MNRAS 267, 361 Mathieu, R.D. 1994, ARA&A 32, 465 Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ 217, 425 Meyer, M. R., Calvet, N., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 1997, AJ 114, 288 Miyake, K., & Nakagawa, Y. 1993, Icarus 106, 20 Mundy, L. G., et al. 1996, ApJ 464, L169 Natta, A., Testi, L., Neri, R., Shepherd, D. S., & Wilner, D. J. 2004, A&A 416, 179 Ohashi, N., Hayashi, M., Kawabe, R., & Ishiguro, M. 1996, ApJ 466, 317
1904.12790	1	1904	2019-04-29T16:07:27	Astro 2020: Astromineralogy of interstellar dust with X-ray spectroscopy	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.HE" ]	X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) in the 0.2-2 keV band is a crucial component in multi-wavelength studies of dust mineralogy, size, and shape -- parameters that are necessary for interpreting astronomical observations and building physical models across all fields, from cosmology to exoplanets. Despite its importance, many fundamental questions about dust remain open. What is the origin of the dust that suffuses the interstellar medium (ISM)? Where is the missing interstellar oxygen? How does iron, predominantly produced by Type Ia supernovae, become incorporated into dust? What is the main form of carbon in the ISM, and how does it differ from carbon in stellar winds? The next generation of X-ray observatories, employing microcalorimeter technology and $R \equiv \lambda/\Delta \lambda \geq 3000$ gratings, will provide pivotal insights for these questions by measuring XAFS in absorption and scattering. However, lab measurements of mineralogical candidates for astrophysical dust, with R > 1000, are needed to fully take advantage of the coming observations.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astro2020 Science White Paper Astromineralogy of interstellar dust with X-ray spectroscopy (cid:3) Planetary Systems (cid:52) Star and Planet Formation Thematic Areas: (cid:3) Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects (cid:3) Stars and Stellar Evolution (cid:3) Resolved Stellar Populations and their Environments (cid:3) Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Astrophysics (cid:3) Galaxy Evolution (cid:3) Cosmology and Fundamental Physics Principal Author: Name: L´ıa Corrales Institution: University of Michigan Email: [email protected] Phone: (734) 763-8915 Co-authors: Lynne Valencic (Johns Hopkins University); Elisa Costantini (SRON); Javier Garc´ıa (Caltech); Efrain Gatuzz (MPA); Tim Kallman (GSFC); Julia Lee (Harvard); Norbert Schulz (MIT); Sascha Zeegers (ASIAA); Claude Canizares (MIT); Bruce Draine (Princeton); Sebastian Heinz (University of Wisconsin); Edmund Hodges-Kluck (GSFC); Edward B. Jenkins (Princeton); Frits Paerels (Columbia); Randall K. Smith (SAO); Tea Temim (STScI); Jorn Wilms (University of Erlangen-Nuremberg); Daniel Wolf Savin (Columbia) Abstract (optional): X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) in the 0.2 -- 2 keV band is a crucial component in multi-wavelength studies of dust mineralogy, size, and shape -- parameters that are necessary for interpreting astronomical observations and building physical models across all fields, from cosmology to exoplanets. Despite its importance, many fundamental questions about dust remain open. What is the origin of the dust that suffuses the interstellar medium (ISM)? Where is the missing interstellar oxygen? How does iron, predominantly produced by Type Ia supernovae, become incorporated into dust? What is the main form of carbon in the ISM, and how does it differ from carbon in stellar winds? The next generation of X-ray observatories, employing microcalorimeter technology and R ≡ λ/∆λ ≥ 3000 gratings, will provide pivotal insights for these questions by measuring XAFS in absorption and scattering. However, lab measurements of mineralogical candidates for astrophysical dust, with R > 1000, are needed to fully take advantage of the coming observations. 9 1 0 2 r p A 9 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 0 9 7 2 1 . 4 0 9 1 : v i X r a 1 The effects of cosmic dust can be seen in virtually every field of astrophysics. The cycle of baryons, the growth of molecules, the physics of cosmic gas, the formation of planets, and the origin of life all rely upon the formation of solid phase materials in space. Cosmic dust has even been found in extraordinarily unexpected places: from the hot halo gas surrounding galaxies (Engelbracht et al., 2006; M´enard et al., 2010) to the filaments of molecular gas in galaxy clusters (Russell et al., 2014; Russell et al., 2017). Despite the importance, ubiquity, and decades of study on astrophysical dust, shockingly basic questions remain. From the perspective of timescales, even the presence of dust in the diffuse interstellar medium (ISM) remains a mystery. All dust grains injected by AGB stars into the surrounding ISM will eventually be processed by the destructive force of a supernova shock (Dwek et al., 2008; Jones et al., 2013; Raymond et al., 2013). However, the majority of refractory elements that become incorporated into interstellar dust -- Mg, Si, and Fe -- are produced in supernovae explosions (Dwek, 2016). The dust that formed rapidly in the ejecta may be destroyed later by the reverse shock, which takes tens of thousands of years to fully heat the remnant (Gall et al., 2011; Raymond et al., 2013; Gall et al., 2014). The debate continues whether supernovae -- on average -- produce or destroy dust. The answer will determine what fraction of interstellar solid matter is formed in the low density environment of the diffuse ISM, through deposition on existing grain surfaces (Draine, 2009). Thus, the origin and fate of dust in the Universe remains a fundamental question in astrophysics, which can be answered by measuring the composition, size, and structure of interstellar dust. High resolution X-ray spectroscopy provides abundances for all ions, from neutral to H-like species, in gaseous and solid form, over a broad range of ISM densities (NH ∼ 1020 -- 1024 cm−2). The signature of solid phase minerals and glasses are imprinted in the shape of the absorption features in high resolution X-ray spectra (Lee & Ravel, 2005; Lee et al., 2009). Studying these X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) features yield the constituent minerals, crystalline content (versus amorphous), size, and shape of interstellar dust grains. X-ray spectroscopy can provide a complete inventory of both the gas and solid phase of the ISM, while directly identifying the mineral building-blocks of cosmic dust. 1 Open questions in astromineralogy Astromineralogy rests upon two major pillars of observational astronomy. First, direct gas phase abundances found via UV/optical absorption line studies, compared to a total abundance table, determine the fraction in the solid phase (Jenkins, 2009). These studies are limited to low opacity sight lines as UV/optical light cannot penetrate the dense ISM. Second, IR and radio studies detect polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), silicates, and ices in the dense ISM. These species are studied using rotational and vibrational transitions, which require complex models. Determining the abundances or grain structures based on these features requires making strong assumptions about their physical properties (Draine, 2003). High throughput, high resolution X-ray spectroscopy can reveal both the structure and composi- tion of interstellar dust. Structures in X-ray spectra imposed by XAFS provide a direct measure of the spacing between atoms in a crystalline lattice (Lee & Ravel, 2005), while lab measure- ments of astrophysically relevant materials provide templates for measuring dust components (Lee et al., 2009; Zeegers et al., 2017; Rogantini et al., 2018). To fully interpret near edge X-ray photoabsorption features, optical constants derived from lab absorption measurements must 2 be incorporated into models that calculate the grain size- and shape-dependent scattering properties (Hoffman & Draine, 2016; Corrales et al., 2016; Zeegers et al., 2017). Progress in studying the cold phases of the ISM through spectroscopic capabilities of Chandra and XMM-Newton (R ≡ λ/∆λ ∼ 500 − 1000 with effective areas Ae ∼ 100 cm2), made over the last two decades, has yielded results that are inconsistent with the standard picture of ISM dust as studied at longer wavelengths. We review open problems and X-ray findings that require new observations, lab measurements, and theoretical calculations to solve. Figure 1: Simulated spectra showing the effects of absorption due to dust. Left: 4U 1746-37 (NH = 5 × 1021 cm2) at the oxygen K edge as observed with a telescope with R = 5000 and Ae = 4000 cm2. If water ice on grains near the diffuse ISM/cloud interface accounts for the "missing oxygen", this mission will detect it. Right: Cyg X-2 (NH = 1022 cm2) at the Fe L edge, observed with R = 3000 and Ae = 500 cm2. It will easily distinguish between iron in various species of magnetic inclusions or silicates, important for grain polarization at longer wavelengths. 1.1 Solving the Oxygen problem (0.5 keV) Oxygen is the most abundant interstellar metal and is a key ingredient of ices and silicate minerals. Studies of the gas-phase ISM suggest that ∼30% of oxygen is locked up in solids, a fraction that increases with decreasing ISM temperatures. In the coldest regions, more oxygen is "missing" from the gas phase than can be explained by silicate minerals alone, suggesting the presence of icy grain mantles (Jenkins, 2009). Poteet et al. (2015) have shown that the H2O ice would have to be in very thick mantles to have escaped detection by IR spectroscopy. Oxygen is thereby an ideal target for X-ray absorption studies on sightlines where there is missing oxygen. Studies will need to take into account the effects of large grain sizes on the X-ray extinction cross sections, but these can be modeled. Early measurements of oxygen X-ray absorption argued for the appearance of additional K shell absorption edges (Paerels et al., 2001; Takei et al., 2002) and residual features arising from the solid phase (de Vries & Costantini, 2009). Later studies demonstrated that many of these features could be explained by absorption from gas-phase OII and OIII, and by including the effects of Auger decay (Juett et al., 2004; Garc´ıa et al., 2011; Gorczyca et al., 2013; Gatuzz et al., 2015). A recent study by Joachimi et al. (2016) also failed to find statistically relevant CO features in X-ray absorption from a majority of X-ray binary sight lines. Resolving this disagreement between 3 X-ray observations and the canon of ISM dust studies at longer wavelengths is crucial for deciphering the mystery of "missing oxygen." The currently available cross-sections with XAFS for OI K-shell absorption are incorpo- rated in the amol model in SPEX (Kaastra et al., 1996). These cross-sections are avail- able at a variety of resolutions, from R ≤ 1000 (O2, CO, CO2, and heavy metal oxides, Bar- rus et al., 1979; van Aken et al., 1998) to R ≥ 5000 (H2O, Hiraya et al., 2001; Par- ent et al., 2002). Figure 1 (left) shows the O K-edge from a flagship mission that would be able to measure the abundance of various oxygen bearing species along highly absorbed sight lines in 200 ks. Figure 2: Example 50 ks astrosilicate O K (Draine, 2003) measurement obtained from the ratio of a point source (Fps) and halo spectrum (Fh) us- X-ray missions using microcalorimeter tech- ing Ae = 500 cm2, R = 1000 (black) or a mi- nology, creating the X-ray observational equiv- crocalorimeter (R ≈ 250, Ae = 104 cm2, in red). alent of an integral field spectrograph, will en- able high resolution spectroscopy of dust scattering halos, which will exhibit resonant structure around the photoelectric edge (Figure 2, see also white paper by Valencic et al., 2019). However, these features cannot be fully interpreted until high resolution lab measurements of XAFS from ices (containing CO, CO2, CH3OH, and so on) at R ≥ 1000, and the corresponding optical constants, are obtained. 1.2 How is iron incorporated into the solid phase? (0.7 keV) The mystery of how iron is incorporated into dust -- its dominant form -- has vexed astronomers for decades. Type Ia supernovae produce the majority of interstellar iron but do not appear to produce dust. Therefore, iron dust must form rapidly in the ISM (Dwek, 2016). Olivine is a prime candidate material for interstellar silicates, and can exhibit a range of Mg to Fe ratios: fayalite contains iron only (Fe2SiO4) while forsterite contains magnesium only (Mg2SiO4). Learning whether interstellar iron is bound mostly in silicates, oxides, or magnetic nanoparticle inclusions will uncover crucial dust formation mechanisms (e.g., simulations by Zhukovska et al., 2016, 2018). This question has taken on even greater importance recently, as attempts to detect the cosmic microwave background polarization have shown how little we know about the polarized dusty Galactic foreground (Barkats et al., 2014; Remazeilles et al., 2016). The polarized emission from foreground dust can change quickly in the microwave regime and is highly dependent on grain size and ferric composition, whether iron is primarily in magnetic inclusions (e.g., Fe2O3, Fe3O4) or silicates (Draine & Fraisse, 2009; Draine & Hensley, 2013; Hoang & Lazarian, 2016). A MIDEX-class detector with spectral resolution R = 3000 and Ae = 500 cm2 will be able to distinguish between different forms of iron, as seen in the Fe L edge region simulated with the amol model from SPEX (Figure 1, right). The current lab measurements of the Fe L region are available with R ≈ 3500 (Lee et al., 2009), but many commonly used X-ray absorption models (tbvarabs, ISMabs) incorporate the Fe L edge of pure solid iron at R ∼ 500 (Kortright & Kim, 2000). New lab measurements of Fe K shell (7.1 keV) absorption from astrosilicate materials are available with R = 14000 (Rogantini et al., 2018), important when NH ≥ 1023 cm−2. 4 Figure 3: Left: Silicate cross-sections for various mineral compositions, using optical constants from Zeegers et al. (2017), publicly available with 1 eV resolution. Right: Simulated spectra for GX 340+0, a highly absorbed LMXB with strong Si K shell features. XAFS from a crystalline olivine (blue) and amorphous pyroxene (red), with microcalorimeter (R ∼ 1000) and R = 3000 resolution, are overlaid on the Chandra spectrum (grey). An exposure time of 50 ks with Ae = 1000 cm2 was used. 1.3 What is the composition and crystalline fraction of silicates? (1.8 keV) Silicate dust produced by some red giants contain signs of crystallinity (Molster et al., 2002; Guha Niyogi et al., 2011), yet infrared Si-O spectra from the diffuse ISM primarily indicate amorphous silicon (Li & Draine, 2001; Kemper et al., 2004), providing strong evidence for significant dust processing in the ISM. Lab measurements of common silicate materials have been performed at R ∼ 4000 − 7000 (Zeegers et al., 2017). They show multiple absorption resonances associated with the crystalline spacing of Si (Figure 3, left). Some of these features are spread out or lost when the crystalline structure is destroyed, as seen in the features for amorphous pyroxene. The depth of the near-edge absorption peak also varies depending on the mineral. Using a cross-section that includes the effects of dust scattering, Zeegers et al. (2017) showed that the spectrum of low mass X-ray binary GX 5-1 contained features consistent with significantly more crystalline olivine than amorphous pyroxene, with grains as large as 0.5 µm. This signature of crystalline olivine contradicts the IR spectroscopy paradigm of amorphous silicates dominating the diffuse ISM. Figure 3 (right) shows how high throughput, high resolution X-ray spectroscopy can better differentiate between the two. 1.4 Mysteries of carbon dust growth and processing (0.3 keV) Little work has been done on neutral C K shell absorption due to the fact that currently operating X-ray telescopes have an Ae that drops quickly for E < 0.5 keV. This is unfortunate, as under- standing the abundance and form of carbonaceous dust is currently one of the most active fields in astromineralogy. Small graphite and PAHs alone are considered responsible for the 2175 A absorption bump and emission features ranging from 3.4 − 20 µm (Draine & Lee, 1984; Draine & Li, 2007). However, models that utilize compound mixtures of silicates, amorphous carbon, and ices can also describe extinction and infrared emission features from the UV to sub-mm (Zubko et al., 2004; Jones et al., 2013). Additionally, nanodiamonds are abundant in presolar grains found in meteorites, and IR spectra of circumstellar material around some Herbig Ae/Be stars also show 5 signatures of nanodiamonds (e.g., Jones et al., 2004; Goto et al., 2009). These hypotheses can be tested by X-ray observatories with Ae ≥ 500 cm2 and R ≥ 4000, as demonstrated for the case of methane, benzene, and nanodiamond material (Bilalbegovi´c et al., 2018). XAFS can also probe the process of hydrogenation of large organic molecules (Reitsma et al., 2014). Curently, these types of experiments are only feasible with X-ray gratings. 1.5 What is the true abundance of metals in the local ISM? Gas can be distinguished from solid phases only with high resolution X-ray spectra, providing a check on absolute abundances in the ISM -- a crucial assumption in measuring depletion. Fur- thermore, ISM absorption in the 0.3 -- 10 keV band is strongly influenced by the adopted mix of interstellar metals, affecting X-ray continuum models on the 30% level (Wilms et al., 2000). A para- metric study of silicate K shell absorption in the spectra of low mass X-ray binaries demonstrated that the absorption edges are deeper than predicted by current X-ray ISM models, suggesting that Si abundances need to be increased (Schulz et al., 2016). Balancing the dust and gas budget for ISM metals is fundamental for testing our understanding of cosmic star formation history and finding missing baryons, a key science charge for current and future X-ray observatories (Bregman, 2007). 2 The current state and future prospects Only two X-ray observatories are currently capable of high resolution X-ray spectroscopy: Chandra, which excels in spectroscopic resolution but whose soft energy effective area has diminished significantly over time, and XMM-Newton, which does not have the necessary spectral resolution to distinguish solidly between grain types. Further, they do not have sufficient Ae to allow selection of sightlines based on dust characteristics; rather, typically only the brightest, most absorbed X-ray sources are selected for dust studies. The next generation of X-ray telescopes are capable of Ae ∼ 500 -- 2000 cm2, offering a factor of 10 -- 100 improvement in signal-to-noise and opening a larger range of sight lines for scientific discovery. Planned X-ray observatories like the X-ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM) and Athena will employ microcalorimeters to measure an X-ray spectrum from every pixel with 2 -- 4 eV resolution. Such instruments are ideal for measuring spectra from dust scattering halos, which will also exhibit fine structure that can be used to evaluate dust mineralogy and grain sizes. This effect is described in more detail in a separate white paper by Valencic et al. (2019). Unfortunately, at the soft end of the spectrum (< 2 keV), where the majority of XAFS from interstellar metals appear, microcalorimeters can only achieve R ∼ 250 at the O K edge (R ∼ 900 for Si K). In addition, their effective areas diminish rapidly in the 0.3 -- 0.5 keV range where O and C absorption signatures arise. Recently developed critical-angle transmission (CAT) gratings technology can achieve R ∼ 2500 − 104 in the 0.2 -- 1.4 keV bandpass (Heilmann et al., 2017). Such instruments are ideal for astromineralogy in our own Galaxy, but would also enable us to probe cold-phase oxygen in quasar absorption line systems out to z = 1 (carbon out to z = 0.2). While X-ray microcalorimeters will do their part to reveal the mineralogy of silicate dust, the state of the two most abundant yet mysterious interstellar metals -- carbon and oxygen -- can more readily be studied with the latest advances in X-ray gratings spectroscopy. Furthermore, high resolution lab measurements of X-ray absorption from fundamental mineralogical building blocks, such as ices and organic molecules, are necessary to interpret the observations that will be made in the next 20 years. 6 References Barkats, D., Aikin, R., Bischoff, C., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, 67 Barrus, D. M., Blake, R. L., Burek, A. J., Cham- bers, K. C., & Pregenzer, A. L. 1979, PhRvA, 20, 1045 Bilalbegovi´c, G., Maksimovi´c, A., & Valencic, L. A. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 5358 Bregman, J. N. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 221 Corrales, L. R., Garc´ıa, J., Wilms, J., & Baganoff, F. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 1345 Series, Vol. 10399, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1039914 Hiraya, A., Nobusada, K., Simon, M., et al. 2001, PhRvA, 63, 042705 Hoang, T., & Lazarian, A. 2016, ApJ, 831, 159 Hoffman, J., & Draine, B. T. 2016, ApJ, 817, 139 Jenkins, E. B. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1299 Joachimi, K., Gatuzz, E., Garc´ıa, J. A., & Kall- man, T. R. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 352 de Vries, C. P., & Costantini, E. 2009, A&A, 497, Jones, A. P., d'Hendecourt, L. B., Sheu, S.-Y., 393 Draine, B. T. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1026 Draine, B. T. 2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 414, Cosmic Dust - Near and Far, ed. T. Henning, E. Grun, & J. Steinacker, 453 Draine, B. T., & Fraisse, A. A. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1 Draine, B. T., & Hensley, B. 2013, ApJ, 765, 159 Draine, B. T., & Lee, H. M. 1984, ApJ, 285, 89 Draine, B. T., & Li, A. 2007, ApJ, 657, 810 Dwek, E. 2016, ApJ, 825, 136 Dwek, E., Arendt, R. G., Bouchet, P., et al. 2008, ApJ, 676, 1029 et al. 2004, A&A, 416, 235 Jones, A. P., Fanciullo, L., Kohler, M., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A62 Juett, A. M., Schulz, N. S., & Chakrabarty, D. 2004, ApJ, 612, 308 Kaastra, J. S., Mewe, R., & Nieuwenhuijzen, H. 1996, in UV and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astro- physical and Laboratory Plasmas, ed. K. Ya- mashita & T. Watanabe, 411 -- 414 Kemper, F., Vriend, W. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJ, 609, 826 Kortright, J. B., & Kim, S.-K. 2000, Phys. Rev. B, 62, 12216 Engelbracht, C. W., Kundurthy, P., Gordon, K. D., et al. 2006, ApJL, 642, L127 Lee, J. C., & Ravel, B. 2005, ApJ, 622, 970 Lee, J. C., Xiang, J., Ravel, B., Kortright, J., & Gall, C., Hjorth, J., & Andersen, A. C. 2011, Flanagan, K. 2009, ApJ, 702, 970 A&A Rv, 19, 43 Gall, C., Hjorth, J., Watson, D., et al. 2014, Na- ture, 511, 326 Garc´ıa, J., Ram´ırez, J. M., Kallman, T. R., et al. 2011, ApJL, 731, L15 Gatuzz, E., Garc´ıa, J., Kallman, T. R., Mendoza, Li, A., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJL, 550, L213 M´enard, B., Scranton, R., Fukugita, M., & Richards, G. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1025 Molster, F. J., Waters, L. B. F. M., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2002, A&A, 382, 222 Paerels, F., Brinkman, A. C., van der Meer, C., & Gorczyca, T. W. 2015, ApJ, 800, 29 R. L. J., et al. 2001, ApJ, 546, 338 Gorczyca, T. W., Bautista, M. A., Hasoglu, M. F., Parent, P., Laffon, C., Mangeney, C., Bournel, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 78 & Tronc, M. 2002, JChPh, 117, 10842 Goto, M., Henning, T., Kouchi, A., et al. 2009, Poteet, C. A., Whittet, D. C. B., & Draine, B. T. ApJ, 693, 610 2015, ApJ, 801, 110 Guha Niyogi, S., Speck, A. K., & Onaka, T. 2011, Raymond, J. C., Ghavamian, P., Williams, B. J., ApJ, 733, 93 et al. 2013, ApJ, 778, 161 Heilmann, R. K., Bruccoleri, A. R., Song, J., et al. 2017, in Society of Photo-Optical In- strumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Reitsma, G., Boschman, L., Deuzeman, M. J., et al. 2014, Physical Review Letters, 113, 053002 7 Remazeilles, M., Dickinson, C., Eriksen, H. K. K., & Wehus, I. K. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2032 Rogantini, D., Costantini, E., Zeegers, S. T., et al. van Aken, P. A., Liebscher, B., & Styrsa, V. J. 1998, Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 25, 494 Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 2018, A&A, 609, A22 542, 914 Russell, H. R., McNamara, B. R., Edge, A. C., Zeegers, S. T., Costantini, E., de Vries, C. P., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 78 Russell, H. R., McDonald, M., McNamara, B. R., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 836, 130 Schulz, N. S., Corrales, L., & Canizares, C. R. et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A117 Zhukovska, S., Dobbs, C., Jenkins, E. B., & Klessen, R. S. 2016, ApJ, 831, 147 Zhukovska, S., Henning, T., & Dobbs, C. 2018, ApJ, 857, 94 2016, ApJ, 827, 49 Zubko, V., Dwek, E., & Arendt, R. G. 2004, Takei, Y., Fujimoto, R., Mitsuda, K., & Onaka, ApJS, 152, 211 T. 2002, ApJ, 581, 307 8
0903.4700	1	0903	2009-03-26T20:59:37	Planet-planet scattering leads to tightly packed planetary systems	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The known extrasolar multiple-planet systems share a surprising dynamical attribute: they cluster just beyond the Hill stability boundary. Here we show that the planet-planet scattering model, which naturally explains the observed exoplanet eccentricity distribution, can reproduce the observed distribution of dynamical configurations. We calculated how each of our scattered systems would appear over an appropriate range of viewing geometries; as Hill stability is weakly dependent on the masses, the mass-inclination degeneracy does not significantly affect our results. We consider a wide range of initial planetary mass distributions and find that some are poor fits to the observed systems. In fact, many of our scattering experiments overproduce systems very close to the stability boundary. The distribution of dynamical configurations of two-planet systems actually may provide better discrimination between scattering models than the distribution of eccentricity. Our results imply that, at least in their inner regions which are weakly affected by gas or planetesimal disks, planetary systems should be "packed", with no large gaps between planets.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version August 10, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/14/05 PLANET-PLANET SCATTERING LEADS TO TIGHTLY PACKED PLANETARY SYSTEMS Sean N. Raymond1,2, Rory Barnes2,3, Dimitri Veras4, Philip J. Armitage5, Noel Gorelick6 & Richard Greenberg7 (Received; Accepted) Draft version August 10, 2018 ABSTRACT The known extrasolar multiple-planet systems share a surprising dynamical attribute: they cluster just beyond the Hill stability boundary. Here we show that the planet-planet scattering model, which naturally explains the observed exoplanet eccentricity distribution, can reproduce the observed distribution of dynamical configurations. We calculated how each of our scattered systems would appear over an appropriate range of viewing geometries; as Hill stability is weakly dependent on the masses, the mass-inclination degeneracy does not significantly affect our results. We consider a wide range of initial planetary mass distributions and find that some are poor fits to the observed systems. In fact, many of our scattering experiments overproduce systems very close to the stability boundary. The distribution of dynamical configurations of two-planet systems actually may provide better discrimination between scattering models than the distribution of eccentricity. Our results imply that, at least in their inner regions which are weakly affected by gas or planetesimal disks, planetary systems should be "packed", with no large gaps between planets. Subject headings: planetary systems: formation -- methods: n-body simulations 1. INTRODUCTION The observed eccentricities of extra-solar planets can be readily explained by a simple model that assumes that virtually all planetary systems undergo dynami- cal instabilities (Ford et al. 2003; Adams & Laughlin 2003; Chatterjee et al. 2008; Juric & Tremaine 2008; Ford & Rasio 2008).8 In the context of this model, planetary systems are expected to form in marginally stable configurations, meaning that they are stable for at least the timescale of rapid gas accretion of ∼ 105 years (Pollack et al. 1996) but ultimately unstable, prob- ably on a timescale comparable to the gaseous disk's lifetime of ∼ 106 years (Haisch et al. 2001). This in- stability timescale implies an initial separation between planets of perhaps 4-5 mutual Hill radii RH,M , where RH,M = 0.5 (a1 + a2)[(M1 + M2)/3M⋆]1/3; a1 and a2 are the orbital distances, M1 and M2 are the masses of two adjacent planets, and M⋆ is the stellar mass (Chambers et al. 1996; Marzari & Weidenschilling 2002; Chatterjee et al. 2008).9 After a delay of 105 − 106 years, a typi- 1 Center for 389 UCB, University [email protected] Astrophysics and Astronomy, of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309; Space 2 Virtual Planetary Laboratory 3 Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 4 Astronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32111 5 JILA, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309 6 Google, Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043 7 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 8 Several other models to explain the extra-solar eccentricity distribution exist; see Ford & Rasio (2008) for a summary. 9 For Jupiter-mass planets, separations of ∼ 4 −5RH,M are close to the 3:2 and 2:1 mean motion resonances. Thus, an alternate argument in favor of planets forming with such spacings invokes resonant capture (Snellgrove et al. 2001) followed by turbulent re- moval from resonance (Adams et al. 2008) during the gaseous disk phase. cal system of three or more planets with separations of 4 − 5RH,M becomes unstable, leading to close encoun- ters between two planets, strong dynamical scattering, and eventual destruction of one or two planets by either collision with another planet, collision with the star, or, most probably, hyperbolic ejection from the system (Ra- sio & Ford 1996; Weidenschilling & Marzari 1996; Lin & Ida 1997; Papaloizou & Terquem 2001). It is the plan- ets that survive the dynamical instability that provide a match to the observed extra-solar eccentricities. Additional dynamical information can be obtained from the known extra-solar multiple planet systems. In particular, the stability in two-planet systems can be guaranteed for planets with particular masses and orbital configurations. The edge of stability can be quantified in terms of the proximity to the analytically-derived Hill stability limit using the dimensionless quantity β/βcrit (the stability boundary is located at β/βcrit = 1; see Section 3). Dynamical analyses have shown that the known multiple-planet systems are clustered just beyond the edge of stability (i.e., at β/βcrit & 1; Barnes & Quinn 2004; Barnes & Greenberg 2006, 2007). In this paper we study the stability of the surviving planets in several thousand 3-planet systems that have undergone planet-planet scattering leading to the loss of one planet. We find that in the aftermath of dynamical instabilities, the surviving planets cluster just beyond the stability boundary, providing a good match to the ob- served values. This provides support for planet-planet scattering as an active process in extra-solar planetary systems. This result also has consequences for the pack- ing of planetary systems and the "Packed Planetary Sys- tems" hypothesis (Barnes & Raymond 2004; Raymond & Barnes 2005; Raymond et al. 2006; Barnes et al. 2008). The paper proceeds as follows: we describe our scatter- ing simulations (§2), summarize Hill stability theory and define β/βcrit (§3), present our results (§4) and discuss the consequences (§5). 2 Raymond et al. 2. SCATTERING SIMULATIONS Our scattering simulations are drawn from the same sample as in Raymond et al. (2008a). Each simulation started with three planets randomly separated by 4-5 mutual Hill radii. The three planets were placed such that the outermost planet was located two (linear) Hill radii RH interior to 10 AU (RH = a[M/3M⋆]1/3). We performed ten sets of simulations, varying the planetary mass distribution. For our two largest sets (1000 sim- ulations each) we randomly selected planet masses ac- cording to the observed distribution of exoplanet masses: dN/dM ∝ M −1.1 (Butler et al. 2006). In the Mixed1 set we restricted the planet mass Mp to be between a Sat- urn mass MSat and three Jupiter masses MJup. For our Mixed2 set, the minimum planet mass was decreased to 10 M⊕. We also performed four Meq sets (500 simula- tions each) with equal mass planets for Mp = 30 M⊕, MSat, MJup, and 3MJup. Finally, the Mgrad sets (250 simulations each) contained radial gradients in Mp. For the JSN set, in order of increasing orbital distance, Mp = MJup, MSat, and 30 M⊕. For the NSJ set, these masses were reversed, i.e., the MJup planet was the most dis- tant. The 3JJS and SJ3J sets had, in increasing radial distance, Mp = 3MJup, MJup and MSat, and Mp = MSat, MJup and 3MJup, respectively. Planetary orbits were given zero eccentricity and mu- tual inclinations of less than 1 degree. Each simulation was integrated for 100 Myr with the hybrid Mercury in- tegrator (Chambers 1999) using a 20 day timestep. We required that all simulations conserve energy to better than dE/E < 10−4, which is needed to accurately test for stability (Barnes & Quinn 2004). We achieved this by reducing the timestep to 5 days for simulations with dE/E > 10−4 and then removing simulations that still conserved energy poorly. As expected, these systems were typically unstable on 105 − 106 year timescales. In addition, about 1/4 of simulations were stable for 100 Myr which shows that we started close to the stability boundary. For this paper, we restrict our analysis to the subsample of simulations that 1) were unstable, and 2) contained two planets on stable orbits after 100 Myr (i.e., one and only one planet was destroyed). 3. HILL STABILITY For the case of two planets with masses M1 and M2 orbiting a star, dynamical stability is guaranteed if: G2(M1M2 + M⋆M1 + M⋆M2)3 c2h ≥ M1M2(11M1 + 7M2) M1M2 (M1 + M2)4/3 −2(M⋆ + M1 + M2) 3M⋆(M1 + M2)2 − 1 + 34/3 M 2/3 ⋆ ,(1) where c and h represent the total orbital angular mo- mentum and energy of the system, respectively (Marchal & Bozis 1982; Gladman 1993; Veras & Armitage 2004; note that this definition assumes that M1 > M2). We refer to the left side of Eqn 1 as β and the right side as βcrit (Barnes & Greenberg 2006). The quantity β/βcrit therefore measures the proximity of a pair of orbits to the Hill stability limit of β/βcrit = 1. We note that our β/βcrit analysis only applies for two-planet non-resonant systems, because perturbations from additional compan- ions can shift the stability boundary to values other than 1 (Barnes & Greenberg 2007). Fig. 1. -- Cumulative distribution of β/βcrit of the well- characterized extra-solar multi-planet systems (in gray; see Table 1), as compared with our scattering simulations. When calculating β/βcrit for extra-solar systems, past research (Barnes & Greenberg 2006, 2007) has assumed coplanar orbits with masses equal to minimum masses. Those values of β/βcrit were systematically affected by the mass-inclination degeneracy, probably resulting in overestimations. In contrast, our simulations provide the full three-dimensional orbits, and hence we can calcu- late the true value of β/βcrit. More importantly, if we assume that viewing geometries are distributed isotropi- cally (i.e. edge-on systems are more likely than face-on), we can determine how β/βcrit would be calculated from radial velocity data (e.g. assuming coplanar, edge-on or- bits). For example, if two planets with masses Mb and Mc have inclinations (relative to their invariable plane) ib and ic, and the inclination to the line of sight is I, then the "observed" β/βcrit would use masses Mb sin(ib + I) and Mc sin(ic + I). In §4 we use this approach to build a distribution of β/βcrit that is directly comparable to the actual distribution (and effectively break the mass- inclination degeneracy). 4. RESULTS We generated β/βcrit distributions from our simula- tions following the procedure described above. First, we "observed" each system from 100 viewing angles, thereby decreasing the inferred mass of each planet by a factor of sin(I + ij), where ij refers to each planet's inclination with respect to a fiducial plane. Second, we assumed the observed systems to be coplanar in calculating β/βcrit for each viewing angle using Eqn 1. Finally, we included the β/βcrit calculated for each viewing angle by assum- ing the viewing angle I to be isotropically distributed. Figure 1 compares the cumulative β/βcrit distributions for the observed two-planet systems with our scatter- ing simulations. It is important to note that the "true" β/βcrit distributions, calculated with knowledge of the simulated systems' real masses and inclinations, are vir- tually identical to the curves from Fig. 1 (this issue is dis- cussed further in §5). Table 1 lists the extra-solar systems in our analysis; we excluded systems with controversial or poorly-characterized orbits and those that were likely affected by tidal effects. In a two planet system with an inner planet at . 0.1 AU, tides will decrease the in- ner planet's eccentricity and semimajor axis (Jackson et Planetary systems included in β/βcrit analysis1 p values from K-S tests of observations vs. scattering TABLE 1 TABLE 2 simulations 3 System (pair) a1, a2 (AU) e1, e2 HD 202206 b-c2 HD 82943 c-b2 HD 128311 b-c2 HD 73526 b-c2 HD 45364 b-c2 47 UMa b-c HD 155358 b-c HD 177830 c-b HD 60532 b-c2 HD 183263 b-c HD 108874 b-c2 HD 12661 b-c HD 11506 c-b HD 208487 b-c HD 169830 b-c HD 168443 b-c HD 38529 b-c HD 47186 b-c 0.83,2.55 0.746,1.19 1.099,1.76 0.66,1.05 0.681,0.897 2.11,3.39 0.628,1.224 0.514,1.22 0.77,1.58 1.52,4.25 1.051,2.68 0.83,2.56 0.639,2.43 0.49,1.8 0.81,3.60 0.3,2.91 0.129,3.68 0.05,2.395 0.435,0.267 0.359,0.219 0.25,0.17 0.19,0.14 0.168,0.097 0.049,0.22 0.112,0.176 0.40,0.041 0.278,0.038 0.38,0.253 0.07,0.25 0.35,0.2 0.42,0.22 0.32,0.19 0.31,0.33 0.529,0.212 0.29,0.36 0.038,0.249 M1, M2 (MJ up) 17.4,2.44 2.01,1.75 2.18,3.21 2.9,2.5 0.187,0.658 2.6,0.46 0.89,0.504 0.186,1.43 3.15,7.46 3.69,3.82 1.36,1.018 2.3,1.57 0.82,3.44 0.45,0.46 2.88,4.04 8.02,18.1 0.78,12.7 0.072,0.35 β/βcrit 0.883 0.946 0.968 0.982 0.989 1.025 1.043 1.046 1.054 1.066 1.10 1.12 1.17 1.20 1.28 1.95 2.06 6.13 Case Mixed1 Mixed2 Meq:3MJup Meq:MJup Meq:MSat Meq:30M⊕ Mgrad:JSN Mgrad:NSJ Mgrad:3JJS Mgrad:SJ3J All 10 cases p 0.14 0.13 1.8 × 10−6 9.3 × 10−4 0.12 0.29 4.0 × 10−3 1.5 × 10−4 9.1 × 10−3 4.9 × 10−3 0.14 p (β/βcrit ≤ 1) p (β/βcrit > 1) 6.2 × 10−3 1.2 × 10−4 2.1 × 10−5 0.10 0.81 0.60 0.12 0.10 1.9 × 10−5 6.2 × 10−4 5.1 × 10−3 0.53 0.07 4.6 × 10−4 0.02 0.43 0.89 2.4 × 10−4 0.02 9.8 × 10−4 2.8 × 10−4 0.58 This contrasts with resonances generated by convergent migration in gaseous disks, which tend to exhibit low amplitude libration of more than one resonant argument (Snellgrove et al. 2001; Lee & Peale 2002). aSee http://www.astro.washington.edu/users/rory/research/xsp/dynamics/ for an up to date list of β/βcrit values for the known extra-solar multiple planet systems. Orbital values were retrieved from http://exoplanet.eu and http://exoplanets.org. bThese systems have been claimed to be in mean motion resonances. al. 2008), thereby increasing the separation between the two planets and β/βcrit. Four individual cases -- Mixed1, Mixed2, Meq:MSat, and Meq:30 M⊕ -- each provide a match to the observed β/βcrit distribution. Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) tests show that the probability p that the β/βcrit distributions from those four cases are drawn from the same distribu- tion as the observed sample are all 0.1 or larger (Table 2). The distribution calculated by an unweighted com- bination of all ten cases is also a good match (each case was given equal weight, regardless of the number of sim- ulations). All of our sets of simulation produced a smaller fraction of systems at β/βcrit < 1 than for the observed systems. We therefore calculated K-S p values by confining the distributions to the ranges β/βcrit ≤ 1 and β/βcrit > 1. All but one case with p ≥ 0.1 also had p (β/βcrit) > 0.1 (Mixed2; see Table 2). However, some cases provide good matches for β/βcrit ≤ 1) but not for other regions, notably Meq:MJup, Mgrad:JSN, and Mgrad:NSJ. Systems with β/βcrit < 1 are unusual because they lie within the formal Hill stability boundary but are stabilized by spe- cial orbital configurations. In fact, all five of the known exoplanet systems with β/βcrit < 1 are thought to lie in mean motion resonances (Table 1). The scattered sys- tems with β/βcrit < 1 are stabilized by resonances or in many cases by low-amplitude, aligned apsidal libra- tion. Four cases in our sample generated resonant sys- tems in at least 5% of simulations (Raymond et al. 2008a) -- Mixed2, Mgrad:JSN, Mgrad:NSJ, and Mgrad:SJ3J -- but only two of these have p (β/βcrit ≤ 1) > 0.1. We attribute the lack of a correlation between resonances and β/βcrit < 1 to the relative weakness of these res- onances. Indeed, resonances caused by scattering tend to exhibit relatively high-amplitude libration of only one resonant argument (Raymond et al. 2008a); these reso- nances have typical β/βcrit values of slightly more than 1 (median β/βcrit = 1.01 − 1.03 for the different cases). Simulations with radial mass gradients (Mgrad) over- produced systems very close to the stability boundary, while cases with equal masses (Meq) produced much larger β/βcrit values (Fig. 1). A similar effect was seen in the eccentricity distributions: the Mgrad cases yielded much smaller eccentricities than the Meq cases (Raymond et al. 2008a; see also Ford et al. 2003). The Mixed1 and Mixed2 cases fall between these two regimes. These trends can be explained by the number of close encoun- ters nenc that occur in the different cases before a planet is destroyed. For the Mgrad cases nenc is typically be- tween 30 and 80, and is larger for less massive sys- tems (JSN and NSJ). For the Meq cases nenc is vastly larger, with median values between 100 (3MJup) and 2000 (30 M⊕). The larger number of scattering events in- creases the eccentricity of surviving planets and also causes the systems to spread out farther. In calculating "observed" β/βcrit distributions from our simulations, we assumed that the viewing angles I were isotropically distributed. Given that known extra- solar planet systems are each observed at a fixed I, could this have introduced a bias in our samples? Figure 2 shows the inferred value of β/βcrit as a function of I for five Mixed1 systems with varying mutual inclinations ∆i. For ∆i . 35◦, β/βcrit varies only slightly with the viewing angle, but for large ∆i β/βcrit can change sub- stantially with I.10 However, β/βcrit varies by more than 10% [20%] over the entire range of possible viewing an- gles for fewer than 10% [2%] of cases. For all systems, the edge-on β/βcrit values agree with the true β/βcrit values (calculated with knowledge of the planets' true masses and orbits) to better than 10%. There is a small bias: ∼80% of systems exhibit a shallow negative slope in β/βcrit vs. I, suggesting that the majority of inferred β/βcrit values may be overestimated but only by . 1%. Thus, although I and ∆i are important to keep in mind, they introduce a negligible error into our analysis. 5. DISCUSSION The planet-planet scattering model appears to be con- sistent with the β/βcrit distribution of the observed ex- 10 We have found that it is actually the angular momentum deficit (Laskar 1997) which controls the magnitude of β/βcrit vari- ation with I. 4 Raymond et al. HD 74156 is an example of a packed planetary sys- tem. Prior to 2008, two planets were known in the system, at 0.28 and 3.4 AU (Naef et al. 2004), with β/βcrit = 1.987. Raymond & Barnes (2005) mapped out a narrow stable zone between the two planets, from 0.9-1.4 AU. The planet HD 74156 d was discovered three years later by Bean et al. (2008) at 1.01 AU (see also Barnes et al. 2008) at the peak of the stable zone. We therefore expect additional planets to exist in systems with β/βcrit > 1.5 − 2, notably HD 38529 (Raymond & Barnes 2005) and HD 47186 (Kopparapu et al. 2009). The probable location of additional planets can be deter- mined using test planets to map out dynamically stable regions between known planets (e.g., Menou & Tabach- nik 2003; Rivera & Haghighipour 2007; Raymond et al. 2008b). The β/βcrit distribution of the observed extra-solar planetary systems may contain information about dif- ferent dynamical regimes. The region of β/βcrit ≤ 1 is populated entirely by resonant systems and may pro- vide evidence of planetary system compression, presum- ably via convergent migration in gaseous protoplane- tary disks (Snellgrove et al. 2001; Lee & Peale 2002). The region of 1 ≤ β/βcrit ≤ 1.5 − 2 is consistent with the scattering regime. Widely-separated systems with β/βcrit > 1.5 − 2 may have been drawn apart by inter- actions with planetesimal or gaseous disks (e.g., Gomes et al. 2004; Moeckel et al. 2008). However, this seems unlikely given that the known planets lie relatively close to their stars and that disk effects should be far more pronounced at large distances. Given that our simulations started with only three planets, we could not calculate β/βcrit values in per- turbed two-planet systems. For example, an interest- ing comparison with observations would be to measure β/βcrit for the two easiest-to-detect planets in scattered three planet systems. This would address the question of whether to search for additional planets in between or interior/exterior to the known planets in two planet systems with large β/βcrit. We thank Google for access to their machines. S.N.R. and R.B. acknowledge funding from NASA Astrobiol- ogy Institutes's Virtual Planetary Laboratory lead team, supported by NASA under Cooperative Agreement No. NNH05ZDA001C. planets ranges from <2 AU to >15 AU. Fig. 2. -- Inferred values for β/βcrit as a function of observation angle I for several examples from the Mixed1 set, labeled by the approximate mutual inclination ∆i between planets. One resonant it has ∆i = 9◦. I = 90◦ is edge-on and case is labeled "2:1": I = 0◦ is face-on. oplanet systems. The distribution can be reasonably re- produced by several of our sets of simulations, or even by an unweighted combination of all ten sets. We therefore cannot strongly constrain the initial planetary mass dis- tribution, although we can rule out cases with very poor fits -- Meq:3MJup, Mgrad:3JJS and Mgrad:SJ3J in partic- ular -- as the major contributors to the distribution (see Table 2). We consider the Mixed1 set to be the most re- alistic because it is drawn from the observed mass distri- bution (Butler et al. 2006), and it provides a good match to the observed eccentricity distribution (Raymond et al. 2008a). In the coming years, we expect many more systems to be discovered with β/βcrit ≈ 1 − 1.5. The pileup of scattered systems just beyond the stability boundary implies that planetary systems are "packed", meaning that large spaces in between plan- ets should be rare.11 This provides a theoretical foun- dation for the "Packed Planetary Systems" hypothesis, which asserts that if a stable zone exists between two known planets, then that zone is likely to contain a planet (Barnes & Raymond 2004; Raymond & Barnes 2005; Raymond et al. 2006). Given the small β/βcrit values of scattered systems, there is simply no room to insert another planet between the two known planets without causing the system to be unstable. 11 It is important to note that the spacing for planets with β/βcrit ≈ 1 can be large. Among just the Mixed1 simulations with 1 ≤ β/βcrit ≤ 1.1 the difference in semimajor axis for adjacent REFERENCES Adams, F. C., & Laughlin, G. 2003, Icarus, 163, 290 Adams, F. C., Laughlin, G., & Bloch, A. M. 2008, ApJ, 683, 1117 Barnes, R., Go´zdziewski, K., & Raymond, S. N. 2008, ApJ, 680, L57 Barnes, R., & Greenberg, R. 2007, ApJ, 665, L67 Barnes, R., & Greenberg, R. 2006, ApJ, 647, L163 Barnes, R., & Quinn, T. 2004, ApJ, 611, 494 Barnes, R., & Raymond, S. N. 2004, ApJ, 617, 569 Bean, J. L., McArthur, B. E., Benedict, G. F., & Armstrong, A. 2008, ApJ, 672, 1202 Butler, R. P., et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 505 Chambers, J. E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793 Chambers, J. E., Wetherill, G. W., & Boss, A. P. 1996, Icarus, 119, 261 Chatterjee, S., Ford, E. B., Matsumura, S., & Rasio, F. A. 2008, ApJ, 686, 580 Ford, E. B., Rasio, F. A., & Yu, K. 2003, Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets, 294, 181 Ford, E. B., & Rasio, F. A. 2008, ApJ, 686, 621 Haisch, K. E., Jr., Lada, E. A., & Lada, C. J. 2001, ApJ, 553, L153 Jackson, B., Greenberg, R., & Barnes, R. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1396 Juri´c, M., & Tremaine, S. 2008, ApJ, 686, 603 Kopparapu, R., Raymond, S. N., & Barnes, R. 2009, ApJ, in press, arXiv:0903.3597 Laskar, J. 1997, A&A, 317, L75 Lin, D. N. C., & Ida, S. 1997, ApJ, 477, 781 Marzari, F., & Weidenschilling, S. J. 2002, Icarus, 156, 570 Menou, K., & Tabachnik, S. 2003, ApJ, 583, 473 Moeckel, N., Raymond, S. N., & Armitage, P. J. 2008, ApJ, 688, 1361 Rasio, F. A., & Ford, E. B. 1996, Science, 274, 954 Raymond, S. N., & Barnes, R. 2005, ApJ, 619, 549 Raymond, S. N., Barnes, R., Armitage, P. J., & Gorelick, N. 2008a, ApJ, 687, L107 Raymond, S. N., Barnes, R., & Gorelick, N. 2008b, ApJ, 689, 478 Raymond, S. N., Barnes, R., & Kaib, N. A. 2006, ApJ, 644, 1223 Rivera, E., & Haghighipour, N. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 599 Snellgrove, M. D., Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Nelson, R. P. 2001, A&A, Naef, D., Mayor, M., Beuzit, J. L., Perrier, C., Queloz, D., Silvan, 374, 1092 J. P., & Udry, S. 2004, A&A, 414, 351 Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Terquem, C. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 221 Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62 Veras, D., & Armitage, P. J. 2004, Icarus, 172, 349 Weidenschilling, S. J., & Marzari, F. 1996, Nature, 384, 619 5
1801.07333	1	1801	2018-01-16T16:18:37	Life Beyond the Solar System: Space Weather and Its Impact on Habitable Worlds	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.IM", "astro-ph.SR" ]	The search of life in the Universe is a fundamental problem of astrobiology and a major priority for NASA. A key area of major progress since the NASA Astrobiology Strategy 2015 (NAS15) has been a shift from the exoplanet discovery phase to a phase of characterization and modeling of the physics and chemistry of exoplanetary atmospheres, and the development of observational strategies for the search for life in the Universe by combining expertise from four NASA science disciplines including heliophysics, astrophysics, planetary science and Earth science. The NASA Nexus for Exoplanetary System Science (NExSS) has provided an efficient environment for such interdisciplinary studies. Solar flares, coronal mass ejections and solar energetic particles produce disturbances in interplanetary space collectively referred to as space weather, which interacts with the Earth upper atmosphere and causes dramatic impact on space and ground-based technological systems. Exoplanets within close in habitable zones around M dwarfs and other active stars are exposed to extreme ionizing radiation fluxes, thus making exoplanetary space weather (ESW) effects a crucial factor of habitability. In this paper, we describe the recent developments and provide recommendations in this interdisciplinary effort with the focus on the impacts of ESW on habitability, and the prospects for future progress in searching for signs of life in the Universe as the outcome of the NExSS workshop held in Nov 29 - Dec 2, 2016, New Orleans, LA. This is one of five Life Beyond the Solar System white papers submitted by NExSS to the National Academy of Sciences in support of the Astrobiology Science Strategy for the Search for Life in the Universe.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Life Beyond the Solar System: Space Weather and Its Impact on Habitable Worlds Airapetian, V. S.1,2, Danchi, W. C.1, Dong, C. F.3, Rugheimer, S. 4, Mlynczak, M. 5 , Stevenson, K. B.6, Henning, W. G.1,7, Grenfell, J. L.8 , Jin, M.9, Glocer, A.1, Gronoff, G.5,10, Lynch, B.11, Johnstone, C.12, Lüftinger, T.12, Güdel,M.12, Kobayashi, K.13, Fahrenbach, A. 14, Hallinan, G.15, Stamenkovic, V.16, Cohen, O.17, Kuang, W.1, van der Holst, B 18, Manchester, C.18, Zank, G.19, Verkhoglyadova, O. 16, Sojka, J. 19, Maehara, H.20, Notsu, Y.21, Yamashiki, Y.22, France, K.23, Lopez Puertas, M.24, Funke, B.24, Jackman, C.1, Kay, C 1, Leisawitz, D.1, Alexander, D.25 1 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, MD 2 American University, DC 3 Princeton University, NJ, 4 University of St. Andrews, 5 NASA Langley Research Center, VA, 6 Space Telescope Science Institute, MD, 7 University of Maryland, MD, 8 German Aerospace Centre, Berlin, 9 UCAR/LMRC, 10 SSAI, VA, 11 SSL/UC Berkley, CA, 12 University of Vienna, Austria, 13 Yokohama National University, Japan, 14 ELSI/Tokyo Tech, Japan, 15 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 16 JPL/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 17 University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 18 University of Michigan, Ann Harbor, MI, 18 University of Alabama, Huntsville, AL, 19 University of Utah, UT, 20 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Japan, 20 Kyoto University, Japan, 23 University of Colorado at Boulder, CO, 24 Institute de Astrofisica de Andalucía, Spain, 25Rice University, TX. Submitted to the National Academy of Sciences in support of the Astrobiology Science Strategy for the Search for Life in the Universe NASA's Nexus for Exoplanet System Science (NExSS) is a research coordination network dedicated to the study of planetary habitability using a system science approach with inputs from astrophysics, Earth science, planetary science, and heliophysics. Herein, the NExSS community describes recent progress and future prospects for characterization and modeling of exoplanetary systems and technology development required to detect and identify signs of life. Introduction. The search of life in the Universe is a fundamental problem of astrobiology and a major priority for NASA. A key area of major progress since the NASA Astrobiology Strategy 2015 (NAS15) has been a shift from the exoplanet discovery phase to a phase of characterization and modeling of the physics and chemistry of exoplanetary atmospheres, and the development of observational strategies for the search for life in the Universe by combining expertise from four NASA science disciplines (heliophysics, astrophysics, planetary science and Earth science, HAPE community). The NASA Nexus for Exoplanetary System Science (NExSS) has provided an efficient environment for such interdisciplinary studies. Solar flares, coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar energetic particles (SEPs) produce disturbances in interplanetary space collectively referred to as space weather, which interacts with the Earth's upper atmosphere and causes dramatic impact on space- and ground-based technological systems [1]. Exoplanets within close-in habitable zones (HZs) around M dwarfs are exposed to extreme ionizing radiation fluxes, thus making exoplanetary space weather (ESW) effects a crucial factor of habitability [2,3]. In this paper, we describe the recent developments and provide recommendations in this interdisciplinary effort with the focus on the impacts of ESW on habitability, and the prospects for future progress in searching for signs of life in the Universe as the outcome of the NExSS workshop held in Nov 29-Dec 2, 2016, New Orleans, LA. This is one of five "Life Beyond the Solar System" white papers submitted by NExSS. The other papers are: (1) Exoplanet Astrophysical Properties as Context for Habitability; (2) Technology Development Required for Future Progress; (3) Remotely Detectable Biosignatures; (4) Observation and Modeling of Exoplanet Environments. 1. Areas of significant scientific or technological progress since publication of the NASA Astrobiology Strategy 2015 From the perspective of ESW, major developments since AS15 are the following: A. Exoplanet Observations 1. Discovery and characterization of superflares on K-M dwarfs, their frequency and 2. Observational search for CMEs from active stars has recently started [7,8]. 3. Detection and characterization of exospheres in hot Jupiters and constraints on star- relations to spot sizes, rotation and effective temperatures [4-6]. planet interaction (X-ray and Extreme UV (XUV) driven evaporation) models [9]. 4. Characterization of XUV fluxes from K-M dwarfs using combined HST, EUVE, Chandra and XMM-Newton data [10,11]. 5. Reconstruction of Zeeman Doppler Imaging in a number of G-M dwarfs as a prerequisite to constrain space weather models [12,13]. 6. Detection of radio emission from substellar objects, extending down to a mass of 12.7 +/- 1 MJup, confirming magnetic field strengths >3000 G for the latter [14]. 7. Development of the capability to conduct near-continuous simultaneous monitoring of 1000s of nearby systems for radio emission (stellar CMEs, planetary auroral emissions) and optical emission (stellar flares). B. Modeling of Stellar and Planetary Environments 1. 3D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) multi-fluid models of stellar winds and CMEs have recently been constructed using advanced data-driven MHD tools validated and calibrated for solar wind models [2,15-19]. These simulations suggest that fast, dense winds and powerful CMEs disturb exoplanetary magnetospheres, generate ionospheric currents, and introduce a number of effects including electron precipitation and Joule heating. These effects need to be characterized to build a comprehensive picture of their impacts on atmospheric erosion, particularly for HZ planets orbiting M dwarfs which will be the first targets to characterize Earth-like exoplanets. 2. 1D multi-fluid coupled hydrodynamic and kinetic models of XUV driven ion escape from exospheres of Earth-like exoplanets suggest that large XUV fluxes from active planet hosting M dwarfs stars may contribute to atmospheric erosion on geological timescales thus making exoplanets within their HZs uninhabitable [2,3]. Determining the timescales over which these stars are active and the extent of atmospheric erosion is vital for understanding exoplanet characterization and target selection with JWST. 3. 1D photo-collisional models enhanced with neutral chemistry were recently applied to model the prebiotic chemistry driven by precipitation of energetic protons due to SEPs from the young Sun and active stars [2,16,20]. C. Technology 1. Development of direct imaging techniques in the mid-infrared (IR) bands with Exo type stellar (extended Fourier-Kelvin Life Beacon Space Telescope, ELBST interferometers (FKSI) mid-IR space interferometers). In the upcoming decade the exoplanet and astrobiology communities need to prepare and develop future mission concepts for space interferometry missions to directly image exoplanets in the near- and mid-IR around nearby solar type stars. The IR spectral region (3-28 microns) is well known for its richness of molecular features from bands of molecules such as carbon dioxide, water vapor, nitrous oxide, methane, hydroxyl and nitric oxide. Considerable technology development for mid-IR nulling interferometers began with the Keck Interferometer Nuller (KIN), and recently the LBTI that have provided the most sensitive observations to date of the luminosity function of warm debris disks in the HZs of nearby solar type stars. Testbeds for space interferometers (TPF-I/Darwin/FKSI) have also been developed in the US and Europe. 2. OST development. The Origins Space Telescope (OST) is one of four mission concepts currently being studied by NASA in preparations for the Astrophysics 2020 Decadal Survey. It features a large (6.5 - 9 meter), cold (4 K), mid-to-far-IR telescope that will be orders of magnitude more powerful than existing facilities. OST will address this key science question by characterizing the atmospheres of Earth-size planets transiting in the HZs of mid-to-late M dwarf stars. OST will expand on the legacy of exoplanet science by obtaining high-precision transmission and emission (dayside and phase-resolved) spectra from 5 - 25 microns at a resolution R = 100 – 300. Achieving the necessary precision with this proven technique requires the design of a purpose-built instrument. Continued development of detector technology in the mid-IR is a fundamental step for the detection of biosignatures in exoplanetary atmospheres. 2. Important scientific or technological topics omitted from the NASA Astrobiology Strategy 2015 and which have seen advancement since publication of the strategy Following the progress in our understanding space weather impacts on the Earth and Mars due to recent missions (GRACE, CHAMP, MAVEN), the exoplanetary community [22] has initiated development of new approaches omitted from the NAS15 to characterize the impacts of ESW on close-in exoplanets around M dwarfs, including Proxima-b and TRAPPIST-1 [2,3,15,21,22]. 3. Key research goals in the search for signs of life in the next 20 years A. Planet Hosting Stars: 1. ESW models for K-M dwarfs require the following observational inputs: i. Far UV, ii. Physical parameters of stellar Near-UV, XUV and radio emission fluxes; chromospheres and coronae; iii. Surface magnetic field distribution (magnetograms). 2. Observed magnetic structures including spots and their association with flares. 3. Refine characterization of stellar ages based on a set of observables including Li, rotation, CaII H&K, patterns of magnetic activity. Thus, dedicated observations of flares on K-M stars at different phases of evolution are required along with flare frequency. B. Star-Planet Interactions: 1. Develop coupled MHD, hydrodynamic and kinetic models that describe the coupling of energy flows of planet-hosting stars, and their dissipation in magnetosphere- mesosphere exoplanetary environments. This requires a well-coordinated and funded interdisciplinary effort from HAPE community. 2. Derive thresholds on parameters of space weather from stars to make a planet habitable (atmospheric neutral and ion escape rates). 3. Characterize chemistry changes due to: FUV, XUV, stellar winds, & particles. 4. Search for radio and optical stellar CME signatures by performing extended long- term observations at lower frequencies (< 10 MHz) with space or lunar radio missions. 5. Search for planetary outflows in spectral lines of H (hot Jupiters) and nitrogen and metals (terrestrial planets) driven by powerful stellar flares from active K-M dwarfs. 6. Explore when M dwarf habitable cases actually shift beyond the ice line due to severe ESW, when combined with ameliorating internal heating, including radiogenic sources as well as tidal heating within compact multi-body TRAPPIST-1 analog systems. C. Exoplanet Environments: 1. Explore how ionosphere-thermosphere systems respond to extreme space weather. 2. Search for N2 through mid-IR transmission and direct imaging observations, as necessary to determine how common N2 is within exoplanetary atmospheres. 3. Detect the chemistry of young terrestrial-type exoplanets "pregnant" with life: signatures of prebiotic chemistry. 4. Detect signatures of hydrogen-rich (primary atmospheres) of terrestrial-type exoplanets around very young planet hosting stars. 5. Understand exoplanet magnetic dynamos, mantle activity, and the interplay between volcanic/tectonic activity and the generation of Earth-like magnetic fields. 6. Explore the role exomoons play in maintaining exoplanetary magnetic dynamos? (e.g., tidal enhancement of convection vs. the possible tidal melting of inner cores.) 4. Key technological challenges in astrobiology as they pertain to the search for life in extrasolar planetary systems A. Direct Imaging 1. The Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer (LBTI) Hunt for Observable Signatures of Terrestrial Planets (HOSTS) study has recently set new limits for exozodi detection for solar-type stars [23]. These results demonstrate the power of LBTI for vetting potential targets for future direct imaging missions such as LUVOIR or HabEx, and the importance of completing and enlarging the study in the next few years. 2. Direct imaging techniques with FKSI-type ELBST. Ground-based prototypes demonstrating relevant technologies and obtaining important science were the Keck Interferometer Nuller, and the LBTI HOSTS project [23]. Development of mission concepts and technologies were curtailed due to budget issues in the last decade. However, recent studies of star-planet interactions, including the interaction of coronal mass ejections with the atmospheres have shown that the atmosphere of the Earth (viewed as an, NO, and other molecules [20, 24]. Exoplanetary upper atmosphers respond strongly in the mid-IR and cools through mid-IR lines of NO and CO2 and open a new potential of mid-IR spectroscopy of exoplanet atmospheres, not only with OST, but also with future ground-based and space- or moon-based nulling interferometers [25]. 5. Key scientific questions in astrobiology as they pertain to the search for life in extrasolar planetary systems 1. How can we detect spectral signatures of prebiotically important molecules highlighting fundamental prerequisites of life including nitric oxide and nitrous oxide? 2. What chemistry of the most abundant and biologically important molecules that participate in pathways producing complex sugars, amino acids, and nucleobases can be learned from the biochemistry community studying origin of life on Earth? 3. How can astrophysics inform laboratory experiments in understanding which pathways efficiently produce biologically important molecules? 4. What steps are needed to build a unified network of theorists, observers, and laboratory scientists to explore the most efficient, laboratory validated, and calibrated methodologies to characterize the biologically important molecules with the strongest spectral signatures (high signal-to-noise, low spectral resolution) of life? 5. Can vibrant/detectable biospheres exist shielded from space weather in oceans below ice shells, beyond the classical HZ (including icy moons and nomad/rogue worlds)? 6. Scientific advances that can be addressed by U.S. and international space missions and relevant ground-based activities in operation or in development 1. TESS will greatly expand the population of known potentially habitable exoplanets, some of which may be selected for characterization by JWST transit transmissions spectra to look for signs of potential biosignature gases. 2. JWST will provide mid-IR transit and eclipse spectra of exoplanets around nearby stars, particularly M and K stars with exoplanets discovered by TESS, allowing characterization of their atmospheres. 3. ELTs and other ground-based platforms will greatly expand the list of rocky planets orbiting ultracool stars and characterize the atmospheres of some of them. 4. WFIRST will demonstrate the coronagraph technology for a future direct imaging mission that would study Earth-like planets, if total mission cost can be limited. 7. How to expand partnerships (interagency, international and public/private) in furthering the study of life's origin, evolution, distribution, and future in the Universe 1. NExSS's interdisciplinary community has an opportunity to formulate well- defined complex questions that can be addressed using a systems approach. To enhance the efficiency of this approach in searching for signs of life, we must also incorporate Origins of Life/Biology methodologies into these studies. 2. The International Space Science Institute (ISSI) is an efficient model of scientific collaboration in diverse fields of space science focusing on one fundamental challenge [26]. International science conferences are another important avenue to highlight challenges in searching for signs of life. We find that having only invited talks that set the stage for breakout discussions has been a novel approach to foster collaboration. From this perspective, the NExSS sponsored ESW workshop was a useful tool to connect and unify an emerging community that brings diverse ideas and methodologies to the table. 3. The key element of collaborative efforts should be the inclusion and coordination of international mission observations, theory, and laboratory experiments to explore laboratory validated, and calibrated methodologies to find the strongest signs of life. 4. International structures should explore observational methodologies through their national agencies with participation of public-private partnerships, such as the Breakthrough Initiative. This foundation plans to develop a low-cost mission to help search for life on Enceladus and its partnership with NASA can accelerate the project. References: 1. Schrijver, C. J.; Kauristie, K. A., Alan D., Denardini, C. M. and 22 coauthors (2015) Advances in LPI Cont. No. 1989. 25. Defrére, D., Hinz, P. M., Mennesson, B. et al. (2016), ApJ, 824, 66. 26. International Space Science Institute (ISSI) http://www.issibern.ch Space Res., 55, 2745 (2015) 2. Airapetian, V. S., Glocer, A., Khazanov, G. V., Loyd, R. O. P., France, K., Sojka, J., Danchi, W., Liemohn, M. W. (2017) Astrophys. J., 836L, 3A. 3. Garcia-Sage, K., Glocer, A., Drake, J. J., Gronoff, G., Cohen, O. (2017) ApJ Let, 844, L13 4. Maehara, H. et al. (2012) Nature, 485, 478. 5. Maehara, H., Notsu, Y., Notsu, S. and 5 o-authors (2017) PASP, 69, 41. 6. Davenport, J. R. A., Kipping, D. M., Sasselov, D., Matthews, J. M., Cameron, C. (2016) 821, L31. 7. Osten, R., Crosley, M. K. eprint arXiv:1711.05113. 8. Villadsen, J., Hallinan, G., Bourke, S. (2016) Proc. of the IAU Symp., vol. 320, 191. 9. Lopez, E. D. (2017), MNRAS, 472, 245. 10. Loyd, R. O. P.; France, K., Youngblood, A. and 8 co-authors (2016) ApJ, 824, 102. 11. Youngblood, A., France, K., Parke L., R. O. and 18-co-authors (2017) ApJ, 843, 27. 12. Lüftinger, T., Vidotto, A. A.; Johnstone, C. P. (2015) ASSL, 411, ISBN 978-3-319-09748-0 13. Airapetian, V. S., Jin, M., Lüftinger and 3 co-authors (2018), submitted to Nature Astronomy. 14. Kao, M. , Hallinan, G., Pineda, J. S. and 3 co-authors (2017) AAS #229, id.408.06 . 15. Cohen, O. (2017) ApJ, 835, 220. 16. Airapetian, V. S., Glocer, A., Gronoff, G., Hébrard, E., Danchi, W. (2016) Nature Geoscience, 9, 452. 17. Vidotto, A. A., Bourrier, V. (2017) MNRAS, 470, 4026. 18. Lynch, B. J., Masson, S., Li, Y., DeVore, C. R. and 3 co-authors (2016) JGR 121, 10677. 19. Dong, C., Jin, M., Lingam, M.,Airapetian, V. S., Ma, Y, van der Holst, B. (2017), PNAS, doi: 10.1073/ 20. Airapetian, V., Jackman, Mlynczak, M., Danchi, W., Hunt, L. (2017) Nature SREP. 7, article #14141. 21. Garraffo, C., Drake, J. J., Cohen, O., Alvarado-Gómez, J. D., Moschou, S. P. (2017) ApJ, 843, L33. 22. Airapetian, V. S. et al. (2018) Impact of ESW on Habitability, in preparation to Int. J. of Astrobiology. 23. Danchi, W., Bailey, V., Bryden, G. and 13 coauthors (2014) SPIE, vol. 9146, id. 914607. 24. Airapetian, V. S., Danchi, W. C., Chen, P. C., Rabin, D. M., Carpenter, K. G., Mlynczak, M. G. (2017) pnas.170801011
1612.08380	1	1612	2016-12-26T13:36:43	Short-Term Orbital Forcing: A Quasi-Review and a Reappraisal of Realistic Boundary Conditions for Climate Modeling	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The aim of this paper is to provide geoscientists with the most accurate set of the Earth's astro-climatic parameters and daily insolation quantities, able to describe the Short-Term Orbital Forcing (STOF) as represented by the ever-changing incoming solar radiation. We provide an updated review and a pragmatic tool/database using the latest astronomical models and orbital ephemeris, for the entire Holocene and 1 kyr into the future. Our results are compared with the most important database produced for studying long-term orbital forcing showing no systematic discrepancies over the full thirteen thousand years period studied. Our detailed analysis of the periods present in STOF, as perturbed by Solar System bodies, yields a very rich dynamical modulation on annual-to-decadal timescales when compared to previous results. In addition, we addressed, for the first time, the error committed considering daily insolation as a continuous function of orbital longitudes with respect to the nominal values, i.e., calculating the corresponding daily insolation with orbital longitudes tabulated {\it at noon}. We found important relative differences up to $\pm$ 5\%, which correspond to errors of 2.5 W m$^{-2}$ in the daily mean insolation, for exactly the same calendar day and set of astro-climatic parameters. This previously unrecognized error could have a significant impact in both the initial and boundary conditions for any climate modeling experiment.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Short-Term Orbital Forcing: A Quasi-Review and a Reappraisal of Realistic Boundary Conditions for Climate Modeling Rodolfo G. Cioncoa,∗, Willie W.-H Soonb aComisi´on de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires – Universidad Tecnol´ogica Nacional, Col´on 332, San Nicol´as (2900), Bs.As., Argentina bHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA Abstract The aim of this paper is to provide geoscientists with the most accurate set of the Earth's astro-climatic parameters and daily insolation quantities, able to describe the Short-Term Orbital Forcing (STOF) as represented by the ever-changing incoming solar radiation. We provide an updated review and a pragmatic tool/database using the latest astronomical models and orbital ephemeris, for the entire Holocene and 1 kyr into the future. Our results are compared with the most important database produced for studying long- term orbital forcing showing no systematic discrepancies over the full thirteen thousand years period studied. Our detailed analysis of the periods present in STOF, as perturbed by Solar System bodies, yields a very rich dynami- cal modulation on annual-to-decadal timescales when compared to previous results. In addition, we addressed, for the first time, the error committed considering daily insolation as a continuous function of orbital longitudes ∗Corresponding author Email addresses: [email protected] (Rodolfo G. Cionco), [email protected] (Willie W.-H Soon) Preprint submitted to Earth-Science Reviews June 27, 2018 with respect to the nominal values, i.e., calculating the corresponding daily insolation with orbital longitudes tabulated at noon. We found important relative differences up to ± 5%, which correspond to errors of 2.5 W m−2 in the daily mean insolation, for exactly the same calendar day and set of astro-climatic parameters. This previously unrecognized error could have a significant impact in both the initial and boundary conditions for any climate modeling experiment. Keywords: Astrometry and Geosciences, Orbital forcing, Solar irradiance, Short-term perturbations 1. Boundary conditions for climate system: A brief historical re- view of orbital modulations of incoming solar radiation The historical development for a scientific understanding of weather and climate change, particularly the astronomical theory of climate change is a long one (Neumann, 1985). For example, the Roman writer on agriculture, Lucius Columella (ca. 4 to 70 AD) began in his Book I De Re Rustica [On Agriculture]: "For I have found that many authorities now worthy of remembrance were convinced that with the long wasting of the ages, weather and climate undergo a change; and that among them the most learned professional astronomer, Hipparchus, has put it on record that the time will come when the poles will change position, a statement to which Saserna, [or Sasernas because J. Neu- mann noted that this is most likely the writing from a father and son team] no mean authority on husbandry, seems to have given credence. For in that book on agriculture which he has left behind he concludes that the position 2 of the heavens had changed from this evidence: that regions which formerly, because of the unremitting severity of winter, could not safeguard any shoot of the vine or the olive planted in them, now that the earlier coldness has abated and the weather is becoming more clement, produce olive harvests and the vintages of Bacchus in the greatest abundance. But whether this theory be true or false, we must leave it to the writings on astronomy."1 Fast-forward to modern scientific age, the well-known calls for "weather forecasting as a problem in physics" and "climate as a problem of physics" (c.f., Monin and Shishkov, 2000) as well as the recent quest for "a theory of climate" (Essex, 2011) clearly exemplify and highlight the struggle of the science of meteorology and climatology for the past century till today. We may echo the most pristine quest set out by one M. Milankovi´c, among other accomplishments also conferred as the father of climate modeling by Berger (2012) upon a comprehensive review of the subject, that: " . . . such a theory would enable us to go beyond the range of direct obser- vations, not only in space, but also in time. . . It would allow reconstruction of the Earth's climate, and also its predictions, as well as give us the first reliable data about the climate conditions on other planets."2 Such facts and reality alone would demand an ever increasing scrutiny for 1The full text of this book is available at http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/ Columella/de Re Rustica/1*.html. 2From p. 6 of Petrovi´c (2009) where the first sentence of the quote has original words taken directly from Milankovi´c's autobiography. We wish to note that the Wikipedia entry for Milutin Milankovi´c https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milutin Milankovi%C4%87 has incorrectly implied the quote to be from a 1913 paper entitled "Distribution of the Sun radiation on the Earth's surface" (in Serbian). 3 a better precision and accuracy in defining and specifying what has been well accepted to be the so-called external forcing boundary conditions for Earth's complex and coupled climate system which involves not only the atmosphere, land and ocean per se but must also necessarily includes a host of other fast, slow and intermediate scales processes involving both the intrinsic magnetic variations and modulation of the Sun's radiation outputs and the distinct effects from gravitational interactions of all bodies in the Solar System (SS) in affecting the geometrical variations of the Moon-Earth's orbital elements. This basic requirement for a correct boundary condition for climate modeling can be sharpened further if climate variations are considered as a characteris- tic to be deduced from rather than artificially imposed on a realistic climate model (e.g., Nicolis and Nicolis, 1995; Lions et al., 1997; Goody, 2007). It is clear from a careful literature review (see detailed discussion be- low for a brief review of those longer term orbital changes) that the limited availability of STOF parameters has thus far prevented from a more direct prescription of this particular boundary condition in any meteorological and climatic simulations and studies of the past, present and future. To the best of our knowledge, a rare exception is contained in the preliminary study by Bertrand et al. (2002). A close inspection from the United Nations Fifth Assessment Report (see Collins et al., 2013, p. 1051) tells us that STOF is indirectly assumed to be unimportant and play no climatic role. The pri- mary argument and assumption in neglecting changes in orbital forcing for climatic changes over the last few thousand years, last century or even last decade seemed to be from the claim that globally-averaged radiative forcing is small or negligible. Other reasoning, involved in climate reanalysis projects 4 and products (see e.g., Simmons et al., 2014; Hersbach et al., 2015), seemed to be that such an effect involved in the modulations of the seasonal forcing and seasonality itself has been indirectly included in other boundary condi- tions like through the prescription of sea surface temperatures or atmospheric ozone concentration or through assimilation of other atmospheric metrics in a 100-year atmospheric reanalysis simulation. More than two decades ago, (Laskar et al., 1993, p. 525) echoed a re- minder that: "The mean annual insolation depends thus only on the eccentricity of the Earth, and its variation over 1 Myr are . . . [very small, about 0.6 W m −2 as shown in Figure 4 of Laskar et al. 1993] . . . In fact, this is not the main paleoclimate quantity, and it was recognized by [Milankovi´c] . . . that the summer insolation at high latitudes had a larger influence on the climate of the past. If the insolation in summer is not high enough the ice does not melt, and the ice caps can extend. This is why it is also important to compute the daily insolation at a given point on the Earth." We agree and only wish to call for a more direct accounting for STOF, as a true boundary condition, in all climatic simulations in that the effects from local and regional perspective are clearly not negligible nor unimportant (see e.g., section 3.7 in Miller et al., 2014) in terms of seasonal dynamical evolution of the coupled air-sea-land system. The importance of accurately specifying the incoming solar radiation on local and regional geographic scales should also be studied and assessed in contexts with the currently unresolved diffi- culties in closing the budget of Earth's energy imbalance (Trenberth et al., 2016) as well as in both interpreting and emulating local and regional surface 5 temperatures using the state-of-the-art general circulation models (Ji et al., 2014; Lin and Huybers, 2016). Furthermore, the persistent modulation of the orbital forcing, via the modulation of the seasonal irradiation ampli- tudes, ranges and their geographical distributions, all across the globe may yield a deeper insight to the basic problems of climate science on timescales of decade to century. We shall limit our exploration and calculation to the Holocene and 1 kyr into the future, for which the longest available accurate ephemeris including this period is the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's Development Ephemeris 431 (JPL's DE431) outputs (Folkner et al., 2014). Another simplification we adopt for this paper is the postponement of the accounting of the intrinsic variations of the Sun's irradiance outputs as caused by the variable nature of solar magnetism on a host of timescales but a recent review on the choices of Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) records to use for climatic study and modeling has been reported in Soon et al. (2015). We will not further speculate on the importance of getting the correct boundary conditions for any atmospheric, meteorological and climatic sim- ulations, but will limit ourselves to a brief note on some recent works as a source of motivation. Cronin (2014) has recently highlighted the key role of getting the solar zenith angle correctly represented in global climate models where errors in assuming daytime-average zenith angle or spatially constant insolation may lead to underestimating or overestimating of global energy budget on the order of 10 W m−2 or more, respectively. Hogan and Hira- hara (2016) documented the situations when the infrequent calls to radiation module in a climate model calculation may lead to errors in stratospheric tem- 6 peratures of 3 to 5 K. He et al. (2015) spelled out the detailed dependence of the amount of solar radiation on the length of day and latitude which in turn for defining the role of Tibetan and Iranian Plateau in constraining the northerly intrusion into the Indian monsoon area during boreal summers.The multi-scale roles of solar radiation on the diurnal cycles and related coupled ocean-atmosphere dynamics of the warm surface ocean including tropical In- dian Ocean and the western equatorial Pacific have been examined by Shin- oda (2005) and Li et al. (2013). Hudson et al. (2016) highlighted the key role by solar irradiation impacts for the reflection heights in the ionosphere that are changing by 15 km, 12 km and 1 km, respectively, by diurnal, seasonal and 11-yr cycles of solar irradiation. Jajcay et al. (2016) shows and discusses the evidence on how the small-amplitude 7-8 yr oscillations in the European surface air temperature records can produce the so-called cross-scale modu- lation in the temperature at a higher frequency range and regime, in their case the annual cycles. It is far from clear that the multi-scale STOF reality presented in our paper would have absolutely no role for this case study by Jajcay et al. (2016). Finally, Joussaume and Braconnot (1997) and Chen et al. (2011) have cautioned earlier on concerning the differences in calendar assumptions (i.e., differences in the Sun's positions with respect to calen- dar days) that can lead to a rather significant impact in climate modeling through phase shifts on the prescribed solar irradiance values. This is why, as emphasized in this work, an accurate and reliable way of tracking time in the orbital calculation is important. 7 2. A quasi-review and overview of several important previous works From a paleo-climatic perspective, the most widely applied studies re- lated to changes in the incoming solar radiation (the so called insolation) due to variations in both Earth's orbit and Earth's celestial pole, have been considered in detail by, e.g., Berger (1978) and references therein, Berger and Loutre (1991), Laskar et al. (2004, 2011a) for a very long time-span (i.e., ge- ologic eras). Such long-term forcing, varying on tens to hundreds thousands of years on incoming solar radiation, is often called the Milankovi´c orbital forcing. These works are effort based on celestial mechanics publications of Milankovi´c (1941), Sharaf and Boudnikova (1967), Bretagnon (1974), Berger (1978), Laskar (1988), and Laskar et al. (2004) among others. Both Imbrie (1982) and Berger (2012) proffered a comprehensive review on the history of the orbital solutions which now have improved techniques and methodologies starting with the classical orbital problem of the evolution of the gravita- tional solar N -body system, which have their roots in the works of Laplace and Lagrange (see e.g., Laskar, 2013). These solutions (as it is usually referred to in astronomical literature for the process in obtaining orbital elements and Earth's orientation parame- ters from a semi-analytic model of the SS evolution) are intended for several million years. Such calculations are based on the numerical integration of the equations which describes the secular (i.e., long-term and long-period) dynamics of the SS, where short-term periodicities, arising from the evolu- tion of the orbital longitudes itself, were simply not taken into account in order to reduce the complexity of the orbital integrations. Specially, the works by Berger and Loutre (1991) cover the field for −5 Myr (i.e., before 8 present); Laskar et al. (2004) integrate a secular-realistic model of the SS, given accurate solutions for −50 Myr and +20 Myr from present. Laskar et al. (2011a) also using very accurate initial conditions and very short time step (less than one year), have recently extended the previous solution to −250 Myr, i.e., including all the Cenozoic era.3 These solutions coming from works by Laskar and colleagues although permitting the insolation quantities at, e.g., annual timescale, but all those impressive results did not account for the STOF variations. The key issue tackled in our present work is the problem of the short- term variations of insolation quantities; i.e., the high-frequency orbital forc- ing, and its variations at decadal and multidecadal scales. This problem was first addressed by Borisenkov et al. (1983) and Borisenkov et al. (1985). They determined short timescale variations between ∼ 2-20 yr which produce vari- ations of the same order as the long-term orbital forcing in a few hundred years. They found that the greatest short-term effect of orbital forcing occurs in high latitudes at midsummer (July); with the lunar orbital retro-grading period of 18.6 yr (i.e., the main nutation term) as the most evident driver (see e.g., the recent evidence found for this modulation of sea level at the Eastern North Sea and Central Baltic Sea regions by Hansen et al., 2015). 3In addition to what was already known about the chaotic evolution of orbital motions of terrestrial planets in the SS with a characteristic Lyapunov time of 5 Myr (i.e., largely limited by the lack of knowledge on the precise value of solar oblateness, J2), it is worth noting that Laskar et al. (2011b) recently proposed that "it will never be possible" to track the precise evolution of the Earth's eccentricity beyond 60 Myr owing to the strong chaos caused by close encounters or even a chance collision between Ceres and Vesta. 9 This effect is found to be of the same order of amplitude as the intrinsic irradiance variations due to solar magnetic cycle variations. Loutre et al. (1992) performed the most complete analysis of short-term orbital forcing to date. They analyzed the Earth's parameters involved in orbital forcing, which are the so-called astro-climatic elements or parameters, for the last 6 kyr at an annual basis (i.e., getting one value for each calendar year). Their astronomical solution is based on the French VSOP planetary theory (Bretagnon, 1982). This semi-analytic theory, was developed in series up to third order of the masses of all the planets considered plus an improvement for the descriptions of the giant planets up to the sixth order. The lunar perturbation in the Earth-Moon barycenter is also included; but the Earth and the Moon are not considered as separated bodies. The basic integration constants used were adjusted from former JPL DE200 ephemeris (Standish, 1982). Therefore, this solution allowed considerably shorter periodicities in planetary perturbations than former astronomical solutions. Loutre et al. (1992) confirmed the earlier results of Borisenkov and collaborators, showing that the most important spectral peaks occur at decadal timescales (say, pe- riods less than 40 yr), but also specified longer periodicities, some of them at multicentennial to nearly millennial scales. They found that, for longer pe- riodicities the precessional modulation produced the most important signals for low to middle latitudes, with the obliquity signals stronger at solstices for polar latitudes. Such an observation is clearly consistent with what is mostly known for the Milankovi´c orbital timescales (see e.g., Imbrie, 1982). It would be premature for us to spell out and prove the direct relevance of all such STOF periodicities for any ranges of climatic measures and metrics 10 while the state of understanding and discussion in the literature remains still largely unsettled. This is mainly because there has been little, with the few exceptions reviewed here, study for STOF in terms of any actual manifestations in the real external boundary conditions that can be subjected to any systematic evaluations. Although Milankovi´c forcing data are available (Berger and Loutre, 1991; Laskar et al., 2004, 2011a), e.g., from the National Centers for Environmental Information of NOAA/NCEI [formerly known as NOAA/NCDC] (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/paleoclimatology-data/data sets/climate-forcing), detailed STOF data and the corresponding insolation quantities are still largely missing from any scientific archives and literature. Secular (smooth) values of insolation quantities can be obtained at centennial resolution us- ing orbital solutions by Laskar and colleagues, from this web page (but, as was mentioned, only strictly for Milankovi´c's scales of oscillations in tens of millennia). To-date, there is no direct data made available publicly, e.g., from Loutre et al. (1992) solution, describing STOF and insolation quanti- ties. Hence, we have decided to provide geoscientists with the most com- plete and accurate descriptions of the STOF astro-climatic parameters using DE431 ephemeris, the longest high precision ephemeris publicly available. High precision ephemerides have the most accurate description of short-term variations of Earth's orbit. Another important improvement (i.e., with re- spect to Loutre et al. 1992) worth applying now is the use of the latest precession-nutation formulas to get the astro-climatic parameters expressed in a reference system of the date (i.e., with respect to the moving equinox). 11 Although a large effect may not be expected in our studied time-span of the Holocene, it is important to use these latest formulations if an accu- rate accounting of the dynamics of orbital forcing is desired. The classical polynomial precession formulas (Lieske et al., 1977) are only valid for a few centuries from J2000.0 (Vondr´ak et al., 2011) and non-rigid Earth nutation series are now available (Mathews et al., 2002) for our inclusion. From Milankovi´c works to present, the incoming solar radiation has been reckoned in different ways (i.e., the so called insolation quantities: instan- taneous, daily, mean mid-month, monthly mean, seasonal, etc.). We think that any arbitrary uses of insolation or derived quantities related to it, could be confusing to expert modelers and non-expert readers alike. The basic insolation definitions and calculations over arbitrary period of times are pe- riodically reviewed and explained in terms of the most basic geometry or refined mathematical tools (e.g., Berger, 1978; Laskar et al., 1993; Berger et al., 2010). In this work we also feel that it is necessary to start review- ing the basic definition of insolation. They are based on daily irradiation over a whole Earth's variable rotation day (Berger, 1978; Berger et al., 2010; Borisenkov et al., 1985; Loutre et al., 1992) which is the basis or foundation of all longer time-span calculations. Daily irradiation is the fundamental parameter of all insolation calcula- tions and its formulation is derived considering the constancy; over a full day, of astro-climatic elements and also the solar orbital longitude (therefore, the solar declination; see Section 3), assuming that the error committed consider- ing this constancy of orbital longitude is also negligible (Berger et al., 2010). Nevertheless, for practical purposes, daily insolation formulas are usually ap- 12 plied, considering the metric as a continuous function of solar longitude; i.e., as a continuous function of time, setting a desired longitude value, which, in fact, could be anything within a particular day. Such a procedure in adopt- ing the daily insolation formulas as a continuous function of solar longitude, is an habitual practice in paleoclimates studies, where insolation variations at a particular orbital longitude (e.g., solstices, equinoxes, etc.) is followed along the ages. The error with respect to the nominal (i.e., a constant solar longitude) daily insolation formulas has not been addressed in the literature, although one can assume a level of accuracy of 0.01 W m−2 in the mean daily insolation, following the claim in Berger et al. (2010). In this work, we have tabulated accurate daily insolation quantities at periods of one day (one Julian day of 86400 s); so we can evaluate the difference or "error" in evaluating the same insolation quantities, adopting both approaches, calcu- lating daily insolation formulas as a continuous function of orbital longitude and using tabulated values at noon of the corresponding day. The main aim of this work is to describe and calculate the short-term dynamics of the Earth's astro-climatic elements, with the highest precision available and the basic daily insolation quantities suitable for climatic mod- eling, for the whole Holocene up to 1 kyr in the future. We present our anal- yses adopting the solar true orbital longitude coordinate in order to avoid "calendar-problems" related to "fixed-day" calendar used in most paleocli- mate studies (Joussaume and Braconnot, 1997; Chen et al., 2011; Steel, 2013). Nevertheless, we also express our data in Julian days; which is a standard time-reckoning in astronomy, this also provides a link to civil calendar of the past and future. Although STOF variations produce departures of the 13 secular, long-term values less than ± 0.15 W m−2, we found that calculating daily insolation quantities with tabulated values for a certain day or using it as a continuous function of orbital longitude, can produces important dif- ferences, up to ± 2.5 W m−2 (±5%) in the mean daily insolation, for the same set of astro-climatic parameters. This holds even for the present day. Again, along our theme of climatic variations should be a deduced character- istics of the Earth's coupled non-linear dynamical system, we consider that taking additional cares in accounting for this aspect of STOF boundary con- ditions in any climate simulation or attribution studies are both necessary and important. 3. Solar irradiance intercepted (or received) by the Earth and co- ordinate systems for studying STOF variations Let us define the instantaneous solar irradiance received at the top of the atmosphere above a geographic location on Earth, at a certain moment of a given date. The amount of solar energy flux, Qt, on a horizontal surface per unit of time, depends on the received Total Solar Irradiance, TSI, (i.e., the total energy received from the Sun) which, as a flux, depends on the inverse-squared-law to the source, for us the Sun-Earth distance r (reckoned in astronomical units, au), and on the inclination of sun beams as follows: (cid:18)1au (cid:19)2 , (1) dQt dt = I = TSI(r) cos z; TSI(r) = TSI0 r I is the instantaneous received solar irradiance, the intensity of the vertical component of sunshine, or the incoming solar radiation (insolation); in MKS system the insolation is reckoned in J/(s m−2) or W m−2. TSI0 is the "solar 14 constant", the solar irradiance received at a fiducial distance by a surface directly oriented to the Sun. The angle subtended by the Sun from the zenith, i.e., the zenithal distance, z, can be expressed as functions of the latitude of the observer and of the declination of the Sun, δ, as shown in Fig. 1. Here a local fixed geocentric equatorial system (X,Y, Z) is defined, X directed towards the local meridian; −Z towards the hemispheric pole (south, here); therefore the direction of the Sun, n(cid:12), and the direction of the observer's zenith, nz, can be written as: n(cid:12) = (cos δ cos H, cos δ sin H, sin δ); nz = (cos φ, 0, sin φ), (2) where H is the hour angle (reckoned from the local meridian, following the sense of the Sun's apparent motion). To avoid confusion with sign conven- tions, we assume that δ and φ are the absolute value of the celestial and terrestrial angles to depict the problem and to consider in our formulation; in subsequent applications we must put the corresponding signs (in fact in Fig. 1, δ and φ need to be negative numbers to fulfill the right-hand rule of the coordinate axes). Besides, we neglect the diurnal parallax effects, so the geocentric angles are equal to topocentric ones (this assumption leads to a correction at a maximum of 9 arcsec). It is thus straightforward that: cos z = nz · n(cid:12) = sin φ sin δ + cos φ cos δ cos H, (3) then we can write the flux of the solar energy projected on a horizontal plane, per units of time as: dQt dt = I = TSI0 (cid:18)1au (cid:19)2 r (sin φ sin δ + cos φ cos δ cos H). (4) 15 As a note, the "solar constant" for us is the index received at 1 au (a fix distance to the Sun), e.g., 1364.5 ± 1.38 W m−2 (Mekaoui et al., 2010); but an estimation based on the mean Sun-Earth distance: < r >= a(cid:112)(1 − e2), where a is the Earth's orbit semi-major axis and e the Earth orbital eccen- tricity; produces a different factor of (1 − e2)0.25 in Eq. (4). The importance of getting the absolute value of TSI0 index correctly for climatology has been recently discussed and explored in Soon (2014). For all the calculations in this paper, we adopted TSI0 = 1366 W m−2 mainly to provide an apple-to- apple comparison with the numerical results shown in Loutre et al. (1992) but of course TSI0 is left as an adjustable free parameter in our computer programs. It is evident that for a fixed latitude, the insolation I depends strongly on seasonal changes which are driven by annual solar declination variations, with the Earth-Sun distance virtually constant at intra-annual timescale, with respect to δ variations. This can be clearly seen by relating r and δ with the Earth's astro-climatic parameters (Berger and Loutre, 1991; Loutre et al., 1992); the above mentioned eccentricity, e; the longitude of the perihelion, ; and the obliquity of the ecliptic (Earth's obliquity), : a(1 − e2) 1 + e cos(λ − ) r = sin δ = sin(λ + 180◦) sin ; (5) where λ is the true longitude of the Earth on its orbit, a polar angle of position of the Earth reckoned from the equinox of reference (γ0) which sets the reference system on which these elements were originally depicted and calculated (see Fig. 2). In what follows, we consider the Earth's semi-major axis to be a non-constant parameter, because it has short-term variations 16 (but not secularly growing, at least, under the considered Holocene interval of twelve to thirteen thousand years), hence this parameter will produce a slight variation on the solar radiation received (of course, if we assume solar constant evaluated at r = a; then a disappears in the formulation). In paleoclimate studies, it is usual to set the Sun's longitude, which we have already emphasized, and is defined as λ(cid:12) = λ + 180, and not the Earth's longitude, because the apparent geocentric solar movement is de- scribed. Hence, in order to identify the correct time of the year when sol- stices and equinoxes occur, i.e., when the Sun passes through them in its geocentric orbit, we have indicated in Fig. 2, the month of the year (for the present calendar time) and the corresponding position of the Sun in its reflex orbit. Here, the vernal equinox (origin of longitudes) corresponds to λ(cid:12) = 0 deg. (March), the June solstice is at λ(cid:12) = 90 deg. (i.e., the Earth is near its aphelion), the equinox of September is at λ(cid:12) = 180 deg., and the solstice of December λ(cid:12) = 270 deg. (i.e., when the Earth is near its perihelion). At this point, it is important to remember that day by day, the origin of orbital longitudes, the γ point, makes a complex movement involving com- ponents of longer period (precession) and shorter period (nutation). Such movements are produced by the combined planetary and luni-solar torques which, in turn, affect the reckonings of longitude and also the Earth's obliq- uity (see Fig. 2 and the next section); i.e., the Earth's pole positions on the celestial sphere. Eq. (5) clearly shows that the movement of the origin of longitudes has a dramatic effect on the apparent positions of the Sun in the sky with respect to the seasons. Because of this, we need to keep the synchronization of the 17 orbital longitudes with the seasons. Therefore, the origin of longitudes needs to be measured from the "true –i.e, real and moving– equinox of the date" (γ); hence if we call λt the true longitude and t the longitude of the perihelion of the Earth measured from the true equinox of the date, we must replace them in Eq. (5); then the trigonometric part of both equations become cos(λt − t), and, sin(λ(cid:12)t), with λ(cid:12)t as the true solar longitude of the date. For the reference to calendar date (Gregorian, leap year mechanics), time is kept following the precession, i.e., it is set, as far it is possible, to tropical year, then the seasons are set with the months of the year at least for several thousand years before and after present. Nevertheless, inconmensurabilities between the involved periodicities and proper irregularities of the changing Earth orbital elements, produces that fixed values of λt does not occurs exactly at the same calendar date. In other words, the duration of the season varies through time. In paleoclimate, a conventional calendar is used, it is the present Gregorian calendar, with the present month versus Earth's longitude relationship. Nevertheless, for the above-mentioned reasons (fixed values of longitude do not occur exactly at the same date), important differences in insolation estimates can occur when calendar date is used as temporal reference, even with the conventional calendar (Joussaume and Braconnot, 1997; Steel, 2013, see below). In what follows, we explain how to obtain high precision astro-climate elements from DE431 for the studied time span. Because we used a standard ephemeris, we obtain the basic data at a certain fix time step, based on a fixed Earth's day of 86400 s, the Julian day. This is the standard way by which the SS bodies are positioned at a certain moment. It is interesting to 18 note that this will also provide an exact link to the civil (Gregorian – Julian) calendar. 4. Some astrometry With the advent of fast computers, it is possible to resolve, by direct numerical integration, the set of differential equations which describe very accurate models of the planetary problem in the SS using high precision initial conditions, for a very long time span. Moreover, the integrated orbits can be fitted to observations which improves the final precision of the solution. In this way, we can get for instance, the heliocentric position, r, and velocity, v, of the Earth as a function of time; this process is referred to as the ephemeris calculation. DE431 ephemeris models the Earth's center of mass movement in the SS and some parameters of Earth's orientation in the inertial space. The position and velocity of the Earth are obtained by adopting the relativistic-barycentric reference system, related to the barycenter of the SS. Later, for a specific moment, through an orbit calculation, we can replace this set of six components of r and v with six "constants" of motion, the Keplerian elements, which have the convenient property for describing the orbital ellipses of the Earth around the Sun. Even more nicely, we can describe the apparent geocentric orbit of the Sun around the Earth with such a set of elements. Of course, through time, these "constants" vary because there are more than two bodies (some of them significantly non-spherical bodies) orbiting and interacting. Then, we need to follow through time the Earth's orbital elements as well as the orientation of the Earth celestial pole in space. These variations are the geometrical causes of insolation variations. 19 As mentioned, the longest high precision ephemeris publicly available is the JPL's DE431 integration (Folkner et al., 2014). It is designed to cover from 13,200 years before the reference epoch J2000.0 to 17,191 years after. And DE431 is in good agreement with all the main ephemerides, i.e., the French INPOP (Fienga et al., 2008) and the Russian EPM ephemeris (Pitjeva and Pitjev, 2014). Unlike semi-analytical planetary theories such as VSOP (Simon et al., 2013), numerically integrated ephemerides naturally include all the terms of the disturbing functions; and integrates separately the Earth, from the Earth-Moon barycenter so it provides the best description for short- term variations on decade to century. 4.1. Issues of time keeping in brief The time used in the dynamical equations of the ephemeris model is reckoned in a relativistic (coordinate) timescale, expressed in TDB (time dynamical barycentrical) units. This TDB time units evolves in a different scale with respect to the timescale in which our civil time (the time expressed in our watches) is based: the UTC (universal time coordinate). Our civil time, can be easily related to true solar time, which describes the Sun's position with respect to the observer's meridian at certain moment for a date. But UTC is not a dynamical timescale (i.e., UTC is not a relativistic- coordinate time). The corresponding coordinate time for an Earth observer is TT (terrestrial time). Fortunately, the difference TDB−TT is less than 2 ms for several millennia (see e.g., Kaplan, 2006). So we can presumed TT to be equivalent to TDB (and vice versa) as a temporal reference related to orbital elements and all derived quantities from them. Therefore, we can assume that one can accurately represent the Earth's orbital elements in 20 TT timescale. For example, a solar longitude recorded in DE431 at fiducial J2000.0 epoch, corresponds to Julian day JD 2451545.0 (TT), or the calendar date 1/1/2000, 12 h TT, which is equivalent to 1/1/2000 11:58:55.816 UTC; i.e., at the approximate noon of an observer at Greenwich. The relationship of UTC with TT has its own problems. UTC is based on atomic international time, which has a uniform scale, but UTC is subjected to leap second corrections. The corrections were done in order to keep UTC nearest to the rotational time; which is in turn non-regular because of the Earth's irregular rotation. The effect of the variability in Earth's rotation has a clear documented evidence in the past and it has a fundamental role on daily insolation determination, because the solar day depends on Earth's rotation. Through this leap second correction, UTC is closely related to the universal time (UT). This timescale has all the irregularities of Earth's rotation. UT is studied and adjusted using ancient astronomical observations and following Morrison and Stephenson (2004) for the interval 9999 BC- 700 BC, the difference TT−UT (which, for our purposes we can assume as TDB−UT) follows a parabolic relationship such that for BC10000 = 1/1/- 9999 = JD−1931076.0 (TT), we have TT−UT = 5.17 h, which is often referred to as the "clock error". This difference shows us that a certain phenomenon (e.g., the Sun's position at noon) reckoned in TDB relativistic- uniform timescale, has probably an uncertainty of that amount when we try to refer as a geocentric phenomenon to be observed at that epoch. This also implies that the present nominal 86400 s for the length of the day (LOD) is no longer valid for ancient ages. This clock error is not usually mentioned nor discussed in paleoclimatic studies, but it is important to take into account 21 for detailed modeling into the past. Therefore, the daily solar irradiance that has been extensively used (Berger, 1988; Berger et al., 2010), based on LOD of 86400 s, produces a very different estimation of the "real" daily insolation received in a whole true solar day of a certain remote epoch in the past (or future). Regarding civil calendars, it is important to remember that calendar days refer to the Julian calendar dates before 4th October 1582. Julian calendar has its own reckoning of the year duration; then, the JD for some events in the past (as solstices or equinoxes) has an offset of several calendar months with respect to the present calendar. 4.2. Obtaining Earth's orbital elements from DE431 The JPL website (ftp://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/eph/planets/Linux/de431) provides a binary file of DE431 ephemeris, tailored for Lynux users, the lnxm13000p1700.b file; the temporal limits of this file are 9/12/-13001 and 11/1/17000. As far as we know there is no simple program (e.g., FOR- TRAN code) to read and directly obtain r and v from it. But JPL provides a Fortran code for testing another version of ephemeris in binary blocks, THESTHEP.f routine. We have modified this routine to get Earth's r and v with full precision for an arbitrary time step. Then, we performed an orbital calculation with a time step at every one Julian day. Thus, we are getting astro-climatic elements at each day which is a huge improvement over other estimates which considered only annual-resolution settings (e.g., Loutre et al., 1992). In this way we obtain a full set of Earth's orbital elements and positional angles: the semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, longitude of the perihelion, longitude of the ascending node, mean anomaly, true longi- tude and the true anomaly all with respect to the reference epoch J2000.0, in 22 TDB (cid:39) TT timescale. Therefore, for present times or instances, assuming a constant Earth rotation speed (86400 s), an observer at Greenwich meridian has such a precise set of Earth's elements and solar longitudes, at noon, to calculate insolation quantities. In what follows, and mainly to represent quantities as function of the time, when we make mention of "time in years", for a specific Julian day number J, we refer to Julian epoch: t = 2000.0 + J − 2451545.0 365.25 , (6) which enable us to reckon the variable time, t, as a real number (i.e., in years and the fraction of a year). The orbital calculation only determines and λ measured from the fixed fiducial (γ0) J2000.0 mean equinox and ecliptic. However, in order to obtain these quantities but measured with respect to the true equinox of the corre- sponding date, we must deal with the long-term and short-term motions of both the equator and the ecliptic. 5. The motion of basic planes Luni-solar and planetary torques modify the Earth's celestial pole and the pole of the ecliptic, which are described by the combined actions of the longer term (i.e., longer than 100 centuries) precessional as well as the shorter nutational changes. Mean precessional changes describe the evolution of the mean equator and ecliptic at a certain date. In our STOF calculation, we want to take into account the shortest variations of these planes; i.e., we need to describe both the true ecliptic and equator of the date. The eclip- 23 tic is defined as the mean plane of the Earth-Moon barycenter orbit around the SS barycenter (i.e., perpendicular to the Earth-Moon orbital angular momentum vector with respect to the SS barycenter). Both, the ecliptic and equatorial planes, are subjected to luni-solar and planetary perturba- tions (Vondr´ak et al., 2011; Capitaine and Soffel, 2015). Fig. 3 shows the precessional elements with respect to the J2000.0 reference epoch. The accu- mulated precession (subscript A) of the equator with respect to the reference epoch is described by ψA and ωA (in longitude and obliquity, respectively); the corresponding elements of the ecliptic precession are ΠA and πA. The mean obliquity of the date (i.e., only affected by precession) is A. Then, the general precession in longitude accumulated from J2000.0 is: pA = ΛA − ΠA, (7) an arc of great circle describing the absolute motion of the mean γ point along the ecliptic of date; it combines the precession in longitude of equator and the precession of ecliptic. To represent the long-term variations of these elements we used the model provided in Vondr´ak et al. (2011), which is a significant improvement with respect to the model described in Loutre et al. (1992) that was in turn based on the older IAU standard of Lieske et al. (1977). Vondr´ak et al. (2011)'s parametrization is based on numerical representations of mean equator and ecliptic (e.g., Laskar et al., 1993), which are consistent with the JPL's Development Ephemeris. 24 5.1. Combining secular and short-term variations for new astro-climatic el- ements The elements coming from DE431 define and orient the plane of the Earth's orbit of the date with respect to the reference epoch (J2000.0). Recall the fact that DE431 separates the Earth from the Moon, therefore we can de- scribe the "true" Earth's orbit around the Sun. Then, for our astro-climatic short-term solution, we need to combine the long-term/short-term variations represented by precessional-nutational parameters and those specific Earth's orbital orientation elements which contain both secular and short-term vari- ations that in turn were derived from the DE431 ephemeris. This particular geometry is described and summarized in Fig. 4. Although DE431 uses an improved precession model for the orientation of Earth; which is a rigorous numerical integration of the equations of motion of the celestial pole using Kinoshita's solid Earth model (Kinoshita, 1977) for the speed of luni-solar precession (Owen, 1990), which, however, is not the actual Vondr´ak et al. (2011)'s model. We think that such a mismatch is not a big drawback because the impact of Earth's true orientation on Earth's center of mass integration should be small for the Holocene time-span we considered in this paper. We contacted Dr William Folkner of NASA JPL and he strongly recommended using Vondr´ak et al. (2011) precession formulas as the detailed model for the long-term evolution of Earth's orientation to couple jointly to the DE431 ephemeris. In Fig. 4, we replace the ecliptic of the day with the Earth's orbital plane, defined through DE431, so we approximate: 25 πA = i; ΠA = Ω, (8) where i is the inclination of the Earth's orbit in the fiducial reference system; Ω is the ascending node. In addition, we add the nutation in longitude and obliquity to the equator movement, therefore: ψt = ψA + ∆ψA; ωt = ωA + ∆ωA, (9) where ψA and ωa are obtained from Vondr´ak et al. (2011)'s theory. The ∆ψA and ∆ωA angles are the nutation in longitude and obliquity. The IAU nutation model, based on the 1980 IAU theory, is now being replaced with the new model of Mathews et al. (2002). Fortunately, its computational implementation is provided in the Standards of Fundamental Astronomy (IAU SOFA Board, 2016) through the SOFA software. We used IAU2000A model, which is the most complete version that includes all planetary and luni-solar effects on a non-rigid Earth with multiple couplings (see Mathews et al., 2002). At this juncture, it is important to note that the arc describing the moving equinox (γ) over the orbital plane of the Earth is pt. We could call pt "the true general precession of the date" because it is the general precession affected by nutation and also by the approximate Earth's orbit as specified from DE431 ephemeris. Therefore, the arc N γ is now pt + Ω in this new description (see Fig. 4). Hence, the changes in orbital longitude and in the longitude of the perihelion, described in Section (3), should be written as: t = + pt; λt = λ + pt, (10) 26 and this is equivalent to a change in the origin of longitudes from γ0 to γ in Fig. 2. Also the obliquity in Eq. (5), must be replaced with the "true obliquity of the date", t. This permits us to find a new astro-climatic solution that we called the DE431-IAU solution. 6. New STOF astro-climatic elements: DE431-IAU solution Now, we must find pt and t values as a function of time to obtain the true longitudes and obliquity of the date. Consequently, we need to solve the spherical triangle of Fig. 4, for which we follow a similar procedure as in Loutre et al. (1992). Using cosine formula (by angle): cos t = cos ωt cos i − sin ωt sin i cos(ψt + Ω) (11) and sine formula: sin(pt + Ω) sin t = sin ωt sin(ψt + Ω) (12) and five elements formula (2 sides, 3 angles; see e.g., Duriez, 2002): cos(pt + Ω) sin t = cos ωt sin i + sin ωt cos i cos(ψt + Ω) (13) we get: tan(pt + Ω) = sin ωt sin(ψt + Ω) cos ωt sin i + sin ωt cos i cos(ψt + Ω) . (14) We wish to note a typographical error in Loutre et al. (1992)'s Eq. (12): the second member on the right hand side should be "+". By solving Eqs. (11) and (14) we find a new set of astro-climatic parameters. 27 As a matter of consistency, we compare our results (pt and t); but re- moving the effects of nutation correction, with the corresponding long-term precessional elements of Vondr´ak et al. (2011), pA and A. The differences are smaller than 30 arcsec in obliquity and smaller than 60 arcsec in lon- gitude for the whole 13 kyr interval studied; which produce a very small change in the solar radiation received, of ∼ 2 × 10−4 W m−2 at a maximum. Such a difference is significantly smaller than the nominal error committed in the theoretical calculation of daily irradiance (see next section). Therefore, we argue that both DE431 elements and IAU related precession+nutation models are sufficiently consistent and accurate for our purposes. We show the full set of DE431-IAU astro-climatic elements (including climatic precession, e sin ) over the full time interval in Figs. 5, 6, 7 and 8, where one point for every 120-day has been plotted to avoid over-sampling effects. We wish to note that these sampling effects can produce the appar- ent spurious spikes in the representation of these elements, when you select these data at a greater time step. Indeed, the smallest periodicities involved in these orbital elements are of the order of a few months. The orbital peri- ods of Mercury and Venus, which produce detectable spectral peaks in e.g., eccentricity, are about 0.24 yr and 0.6 yr, respectively (see also next section). At first sight, and comparing with Loutre et al. (1992) solution, the DE431- IAU solution seems to be "richer", with the evidence being most obvious using the finest time resolution. The spectral analyses performed on them confirm our claim. 28 6.1. Short-term periodicities detected We have explored spectral analyses on the DE431-IAU solution by using several methods; mainly, Lomb periodogram, maximum entropy and multi- taper method (MTM), and have found a profuse amount of spectral lines which basically include all the periodicities found in previous works. Short- term periodicities in astro-climatic elements were reported by Borisenkov et al. (1983) studying daily insolation variations at several latitudes; they were: 2.7 yr, 4.0 yr, 5.9 yr, 11.9 and 18.6 yr. Loutre et al. (1992) determined several short-term periodicities by analyzing first the variations of the astro- climatic elements. For daily insolation at 65◦N, they found essentially the same periodicities (showing that the most important spectral peaks occur at decadal, say < 40 yr, time-scale), plus 8.1 yr, 15.7 yr and 29 yr periods; arguing that these last were coming from perturbations by Venus, Mars and Saturn. These are the main periodicities detected, but longer term periodici- ties (e.g., ∼ 40, 60, 800, 900 yr) were also detected, but needing more detailed scrutiny and careful examination. We agree with Loutre et al. (1992) that MTM is a good choice for analyzing astro-climatic elements because this method produces less noisy spectrum with an easy way to calculate confi- dence levels; in this regard, we have used SSA-MTM toolkit from Ghil et al. (2002). Our results show strong non-linear trends in the spectra (which is clear from the element's graphics, Fig. 5-8), even while analyzing shorter portions of the time series; therefore, our analysis include a prior detrending of the time series. This is essential for a proper determination of the spectral peaks corresponding to the longer periods. In astro-climatic elements, these short periodicities are associated with 29 planetary mean motions or combinations of them because the Earth's dis- turbing function depends on these orbital configurations (see Roy, 1978; Murray and Dermott, 1999). These are generically called inequalities be- cause the mean motion relationships p ni − q no, where p and q are integers and ni, no are the mean motion of both planets, oscillates around a small (say, few degrees per year) value, but are not exactly zero (the planets are not in mean motion resonance; in fact, there are no exact mean motion res- onances between planets in the SS). If the associated coefficient (Cj) in the periodic term of the disturbing function is significant, then that term of the perturbation is important. For example, if only two planets have been taken into account, the periodic variations of Earth's orbital elements depend on terms of the following form:(cid:88) Cj pni − q no j sin((p ni − q no) t + Bj) (15) where Bj is another coefficient depending on angular Keplerian elements. Hence, if an inequality is small and the amplitude Cj is important, we are in the presence of a significant perturbation, whose period is: (cid:32) (cid:33) (16) Per(p ni − q no) = 2π ABS(p ni − q no) = ABS 1 − q Po p Pi where Pi and Po are the orbital periods involved (note that p = q = 1 cor- responds to the synodic periods of the pair of planets); ABS is the absolute value function. The smaller the significant inequality, the longer the associ- ated perturbation period. In the SS the most important interaction is the Jupiter-Saturn (2:5) relationship, i.e., 2nj − 5ns (cid:39) −0.4 deg. yr , which leads to a 30 Great Inequality of period ∼ 800-1100 yr (see e.g., Wilson, 1985); which was detected by Loutre et al. (1992) in the evolution of eccentricity. In order to identify the planetary origin of these short periodicities, we need to evaluate the most important terms that produce detectable peaks in the spectral analysis of the Earth's disturbing function, from Venus to, at least, Saturn. The simplest and most complete way in achieving this is to perform the high precision numerical simulations as provided by the MERCURY software package for orbital dynamics (Chambers, 1999) and then evaluate if any spectral peaks may be present (for a deep theoretical description and spe- cific calculation of perturbations for a couple of planets the reader is directed to Simon, 1987). First, we integrate the Earth's orbital motions adding only one planet at a time from Mercury to Saturn, to identify the "pure" peri- odicity of relevant perturbations; then we integrate the Earth with pairs of "related" planets (Venus + Mars; Jupiter + Saturn; etc.) to see the modi- fication to these "pure" periodicities, and then all the relevant bodies (from Venus to Saturn) to see what, if any or all, of these short-term periodicities "are surviving" despite the predatory effects from stronger combined pertur- bations. By adopting this procedure we report in Fig. 9 that the prominent peaks related to planet Venus are (in the order of importance, i.e., spectral power): 3.98 yr = Per(2V-3E); 2.67 yr = Per(V-2E); 8.10 yr = Per(3V-5E); 7.84 yr = Per(5V-8E), with V and E denote the mean motions of Venus and Earth. For the planet 31 Mars, the most conspicuous peak is: 15.76 yr = Per(E-2Ma), where Ma denotes the mean motion of Mars. In Fig. 9, the minor peaks labeled as P, P2 and P3, but with a confidence level less than 95%, come from Mars and correspond to the following periods: 2.47 yr = Per(2E-3Ma); 2.9 yr = Per(3E-5Ma); 5.25 yr = Per( 3(E-2Ma)). Peaks provided by Jupiter and Saturn mean motions (Per(J) = 11.86 yr; Per(S) = 29.4 yr) are also clearly visible. Of course the peaks around 6 yr and 14.7 yr are the second harmonics of J and S. The result of these short-term simulations are in good agreement with main result of previous works. It is important to note that the magnitude of the power spectrum cannot be taken as a direct indication of the perturbation intensity. Only an approximate estimation can be deduced from the raw data; the spec- trum depends on detrending, sampling, etc., hence the relative intensity of two peaks can largely vary for the same phenomena, if the input data are processed straightforwardly. Fig. 10 shows our MTM analysis (with a parabolic detrending of the raw, original data shown in Fig. 5) of the 13 kyr evolution of the record of eccentricity. All the peaks shown in Fig. 9 are detected in the detrended time series. Particularly, some peaks, such as the P, P2 and P3 are rein- forced; raising above the 99% confidence level (note that P2 is immersed 32 in the power of the signal at around 2.7 yr). Some higher harmonics such as 4J, 3U (i.e., forth and third harmonics of Jupiter and Uranus mean mo- tions, respectively); P4 (the sixth harmonics of 8E-15Ma, ∼ 41 yr); and P5 (fourth harmonics of the synodic period of Saturn and Neptune of ∼ 36 yr), also appear. In particular, the perturbation with periodicities at around 3 yr strongly disturbs the (V-2E) periodicity and shifts this peak to 2.71 yr. Longitude of the perihelion or climatic precession shows basically the same periodicities (not shown). Notably, a spectral peak related to 4E-7Ma, not previously shown, is strongly present at around 3.56 yr. The other observed peaks are harmonics of the orbital frequencies present or non-linear combi- nations of the physical parameters' frequencies intervening in the definition of eccentricity. Fig. 11 shows the MTM spectrum of obliquity from the detrended data record. Although a cubic-parabolic detrending have been applied to the raw series shown originally in Fig. 8, a secular trend in the spectral power is still present. This spectrum shows some common periodicities with the eccentricity and the precession of the perihelion signals. Periods directly coming from nutation are clearly detected, especially the period of lunar node (MΩ), and the inequality 2E-3Ma, which comes from the direct part of planetary perturbation on Earth equatorial bulge (Souchay and Kinoshita, 1996, 1997; Souchay et al., 1999). Other direct planetary effects on nutation come from 4E-7Ma, and 3E-5Ma. In particular, a periodicity of 8.85 yr is clearly visible that is related to the second harmonic of Saturn-Uranus synodic frequency (period of about 17.9 yr), which produces considerable torque in the SS (see Cionco and Abuin, 2016). Nevertheless, this 8.85 yr 33 periodicity can also be related to the small perturbation of the Moon on the second order terrestrial potential J3 (rigid Earth), with the argument −lM +F +MΩ; where lM is the mean anomaly of the Moon and F = LM−MΩ, where LM is the mean orbital longitude of the Moon. In summary, all of the above-mentioned spectral peaks are by far the most important periodicities lesser than one century. Our solution DE431- IAU is more complete in covering all the periodicities that were previously known and shown; and some of these periods are expressed in daily insolation quantities which in turn should be studied for any relations to weather and climate as well as all the underlying physical processes. 7. Daily irradiance calculations The daily irradiation or daily insolation, Q, for a whole rotational day of duration τ and the mean daily irradiance, W , at a given latitude, can be obtained by using Eq. (4), integrating over one full Earth's rotation, being the integral that is only significant when the Sun is over the horizon. In addition if we assume elements others than H to be unchanging over a whole day, the mean daily irradiance is: W = 1 2π (cid:90) π (cid:18)1au −π I(φ, δ, r, H) dH (cid:19)2 2 (cid:90) Hs = TSI0 r 2π 0 (sin φ sin δ + cos φ cos δ cos H) dH, (17) where Hs is the sunset hour angle. Finally: (cid:18)1au (cid:19)2 r W = TSI0 π (Hs sin φ sin δ + cos φ cos δ sin Hs), (18) 34 reckoned in the same units as TSI0 (W m−2). In addition, Eq. (4) permits one to find the daily amount of solar irradiance between the time of sunrise (ts) and sunset (tp) which is: (cid:18)1au (cid:19)2(cid:90) tp r ts Q = TSI0 (sin φ sin δ + cos φ cos δ cos H) dt, (19) if we assume t to be the mean solar-time timescale (i.e., we drop the difference with true solar time); using the rotational relationship with H (1 mean day of τ seconds): H = (t − to), 2π τ (20) then: (cid:18)1au (cid:19)2(cid:90) Hs r 0 Q = τ π TSI0 (sin φ sin δ + cos φ cos δ cos H) dH, (21) for one solar day of τ = 86400 s; and assuming the constancy of the Sun declination, Q becomes: (cid:18)1au (cid:19)2 (Hs sin φ sin δ + cos φ cos δ sin Hs), (22) Q = 86400 π TSI0 r which is expressed in J m−2, if TSI0 is in W m−2. Eq. (3) permits one to find the value of the H at sunrise-sunset. When the Sun is on the horizon (i.e., Sun at 90 deg. of the zenith) the dot product is zero, hence: cos(Hs) = − tan φ tan δ. (23) 35 Eq. (23) acts as a discriminant for sunrise-sunset. If we call D = − tan φ tan δ, then the Sun rises and sets at certain latitude when: − 1 ≤ D ≤ 1. (24) If D = −1 for a particular observer; the Sun is at the limit of rising and setting; i.e., when Hs = ±180 deg.; the Sun becomes circumpolar for that observer: no sunrise-sunset for the time-span during D < −1. Of course, this occurs when φ and δ have the same sign (the Sun at the same hemispheric position). Then if: D < −1, (25) the Sun does not set (polar day). When the Sun's declination changes sign, the winter season arrives, and Hs decreases, and for certain latitude, it is virtually zero; then D = 1. Therefore, the Sun does not rise (polar night), if: (26) and insolation quantities are null. If D < −1, then the integrand in Eq. (17) is significant over 0 to 2π; hence, the mean irradiance for the circumpolar D > 1, Sun is: Wc = TSI0 = TSI0 (cid:18)1au (cid:18)1au r r Then, Eq. (19) becomes: (cid:90) 2π 0 (cid:19)2 1 (cid:19)2 2π (sin φ sin δ + cos φ cos δ cos H) dH sin φ sin δ. (27) 36 (cid:18)1au r Qc = TSI0 = 86400 TSI0 (cid:19)2 86400 (cid:18)1au (cid:19)2 2π r (cid:90) 2π 0 (sin φ sin δ + cos φ cos δ cos H) dH sin φ sin δ. (28) Therefore, using Eq. (23) as discriminant, we can calculate by means of Eqs. (18, 22, 27, 28), these daily solar quantities, knowing all of the other corresponding solar-terrestrial parameters for a certain date. As a matter of consistency, we see that the averaged quantities can be directly obtained in dividing the daily values by 86400 (W = Q/86400). In the derivation of Eqs. (18, 22, 27, 28) we adopted a day-based ap- proach, i.e., taking the longitude data tabulated (at noon) for that date. This particular approach is the conventional procedure commonly used in obtaining daily solar quantities (see e.g., Berger, 1988; Laskar et al., 1993; Berger et al., 2010). Nevertheless, as we have hinted at the beginning of this article, it is an usual practise in paleoclimate studies, to calculate Q (or W ) by fixing the Earth/Sun position at an arbitrary moment; i.e., fixing an arbitrary value of solar longitude inside a particular day; this is equivalent to taking Eqs. (18, 22, 27, 28) as a continuous function of longitudes. For example, to follow the daily irradiation at March equinox for a mid-latitude observer, the Eq. (18) is used by setting λ(cid:12) t = 0 as a temporal reference in Eq. (5), to find δ. This approach is understandable because at ancient time we do not know these parameters "exactly" at noon. Moreover, we can assume that the change of solar longitude inside a day does not significantly affect the estimate of daily insolation (Berger et al., 2010). Nevertheless, we consider the clarification and recognition of this assumption to be important 37 for all users of available databases of solar irradiation (see next Sub-Section 77.1). Fig. 12 shows the daily mean irradiation at equinoxes (λ(cid:12) t = 0, 180 deg.), using our DE431-IAU solution, over the indicated calendar time, at 65◦N. The solar constant used is 1366 W m−2. Fig. 13 shows similar quantities as in Fig. 12 but for solstices; i.e., λ(cid:12) t = 90, 270 deg. Both calculations were performed taking Eq. (18) as a continuous function of solar longitude. As were pointed out by Borisenkov et al. (1983) and Loutre et al. (1992), the secular long-term modulation by precession is evident for equinoxes, even at high latitudes. For solstices the dominant signal is provided by the modulation of the obliquity variations. For daily insolation calculations, we prepare a FORTRAN code that calculates Q and W (Eqs. 18, 22, 27, 28) along the time for a specific solar longitude and latitude on Earth. The code INSOLA-Q-W.for permits the calculation of Q or W for the exact mid-day at the tabulated longitude of a certain Julian day, or to set Q or W as continuous functions of the solar longitude, which is the common practice in paleoclimate studies. Fig. 12 and 13 were made with this last strategy, i.e., by setting λ(cid:12) t with the desired value (0, 90, 180 or 270 deg.) using Eq. (18) and (22), but taking the DE431- IAU elements for the specific tabulated JD within which the corresponding value, in our cases of equinoxes or solstices, occurs. Hence, these values were calculated for the specific astro-climatic parameters of the corresponding mid- day, but did not used the tabulated mid-day longitude, as daily insolation should be calculated in theory. The difference between the desired longitude and the tabulated mid-day value can reach ∼ ± 0.7 deg. Fig. 14 shows W at the "mid-month" of July; i.e., λ(cid:12) t = 120 deg. In 38 keeping with the usual practice in paleoclimate, we are continuing to adopt the present calendar defining mid-month moments at an angular step of 30 deg., from March (0 deg.) to February (330 deg.). Then the calculation was also performed taking W as a continuous function of λ(cid:12) t. The period corresponds to the same interval considered in Figure 12a of Loutre et al. (1992), from 1450 AD to 1950 AD. In fact, this permits a direct comparison of our result with Loutre et al. (1992); and this comparison yields a very good agreement. We do not know the precise TSI0 value adopted by those authors (but we presumed it was about 1366-1367 W m−2 during solar activity min- ima as hinted on p. 191 of Loutre et al. 1992), but this level of agreement is reached with 1366 W m−2. The obliquity signal is prominently present, with the two main periodicities clearly visible: the ∼ 20 yr oscillation due to lunar retro-gradating motion (18.6 yr) and the strong ∼ 2-3 yr period. With regards to other periodicities, we performed an extensive spectral analysis on daily insolation outputs (using detrended time series), especially focused at the shortest periodicities on biennial to 40 yr timescales (the main periods present in astro-climatic elements). For a comparison with Loutre et al. (1992), we show the results for July mid-month at 65◦N (Fig. 15). Several periods visible in the eccentricity, longitude of the perihelion and obliquity signals are present, but also prominent harmonics and non- linear interactions of frequencies present in the parameters that define daily insolation. The shortest periods oscillate at about 2.42 yr and 2.69 yr and correspond to the perturbed periods by 2E-3Ma and V-2E, respectively. At around 3 yr there are several harmonics and 3E-5Ma (2.9 yr), 4E-7Ma (3.56 yr), 4J; etc. Then 3.98 yr (2V-3E); 5.26 yr (3(E-2Ma)); 2J; 7.88 yr (5V-8E); 39 8.09 yr (3V-5E); Per(J); Per(2 MΩ), Per(2S), Per(MΩ) and Per(S) complete the most important periods present. For lower latitudes (e.g., 0 deg.), the spectrum is essentially the same; the only change is the attenuation of the obliquity signal; as expected because precession signal is dominant at tropical latitudes. At these lower latitudes, the 18.6 yr period and its harmonics appears smaller than, for example, the Jupiter signal. Although our derived periodicities are similar to Loutre et al. (1992), we found a richer set of periodicities at around 2-3 yr, 5 yr, and 8 yr, coming from a more complete description of planetary perturbations performed in DE431 and also the more complete model of nutation. Also, by performing a much more detailed detrending and sampling, we can also produce similar results as those discussed in Loutre et al. (1992) for the longest periodicities covering oscillations on timescales from multicenturies to a millennium. In addition, we have created another code MONTH-GEO.for designing to calculate the geographical distribution of mid-month insolation for arbitrary years (between −10 kyr, 3 kyr), in different latitudinal bands. An output for the year 1650, near the beginning of the Maunder Minimum, can be seen in Table 1, for the indicated latitudes. This code calculates W , as continuous functions of λ(cid:12) t, i.e., at the corresponding longitudes for each mid-month of the conventional calendar. All our codes are available with the publication of this paper. 7.1. The effect of the non-constant longitude within a day As discussed in details in the previous section, Q and W formulas were derived assuming that we have astro-climatic elements and true orbital lon- gitudes at solar noon (H = 0) and these values do not change significantly 40 over a complete 2π variation of H. This approximation is supposed to lead to a maximum theoretical error of 0.01 W m−2 in the determinations of W (Berger et al., 2010). In our STOF calculations, we know the value of the true solar longitude at mid-day and the astro-climatic elements for that day. Therefore, we can estimate the difference or "error" in the estimation of corresponding solar quantity between the exact tabulated value at mid-day (Q0 and W0) and the estimation considering Q or W as a continuous function of λ(cid:12) t: the difference, Q−Q0, W −W0 and also the "relative error" ratio, (Q−Q0)/Q0 = (W − W0)/W0. As far as we know, these differences have not been discussed nor addressed in the literature. To describe these differences as a function of time, we have shown in Fig. 16 and 17 (for 65◦N) the relative error ratios evaluated at equinoxes and solstices for all the 13 kyr studied period. At the solstices, when the Sun is stationary, the relative errors are small. Although there are values as large as 0.2%, they are all mostly less than 0.1%. For the equinoxes the relative differences are larger, reaching ± 1.2%. Evidently, we are confirming that the characteristic of this relative error is dependent on solar longitude. To explore this, we calculate this error as a function of longitude for every 10-degree interval. The result is shown in Fig. 18. We observe very large relative differences of up to ± 5% around December solstice. The biggest relative differences between nominal Q or W values and the corresponding values as continuous functions of time, occur at the moment when the Sun is near the extreme declination at opposite hemispheres. This means that these big relative errors occur in the seasons when the insolation 41 values are near minimum (of course, the same occurs for a southern observer); then, there are not so important differences on the amount of modeled re- ceived energy at these moments, as we can see in Fig. 19, where W values (in continuous and tabulated modes) for λ(cid:12) t = 250 deg. (i.e., November- December), are depicted for the last 1 kyr. Nevertheless, as we can see in Fig. 20, this error for the mean daily insolation, can increase up to ∼ 2.5 W m−2 in absolute values. These largest errors occur after the March equinox (at the beginning of the boreal spring) and at the end of the boreal summer. The behavior of these differences depends strictly on the trigonometric part of Eq. (18), which is a monotonically increasing function of declination, which varies approximately between 7×10−3 and 1 between December and June, re- spectively, for a northern observer. The smallest errors are occurring around solstice of December because of the very small differences resulting from the subtraction between two smallest values of this function. Conversely, slightly larger errors with respect to December solstice, occur near solstice of June, when the expression for the trigonometric function in Eq. (18) has its largest values. The characteristics of this error is similar as a function time, over the full 13 kyr interval studied. Of course, this error could lead to large differences for initial conditions in a climatic modeling code especially when the climatic system is evolving nonlinearly while encountering the chaotic regime of the climate dynamic phase space. Therefore, the difference in evaluating Q or W as continuous functions of longitudes or tabulated values, provides a clue of the "uncertainty" associated with the correct incoming solar radiation when the daily insolation value is basically a guess in connection to climate 42 modeling. 7.2. Comparison with the state of the art works by J. Laskar and colleagues The longest database available for Milankovit´c orbital forcing is the one provided by Laskar et al. (2004), and its extension to −250 Myr in Laskar et al. (2011a). While this solution in astro-climatic elements is given for −250 Myr from present, inherent problems to its chaotic evolution make it strictly valid, in paleoclimate studies, over about −50 Myr and +20 Myr from the present, which is the time-span covered by former Laskar et al. (2004) solution. This French solution (available at NOAA/NCDC which redirect to L'Institut de M´ecanique C´eleste et de Calcul des ´Eph´em´erides -IMCCE-) is consistent with Berger and Loutre (1991) for the last 5 Myr where latter was, in turn, based on the original Laskar (1986, 1988) results. This is the reason we have considered only the solution calculated by Laskar and colleagues which we have labeled here as La2010 solution, as the authors named their last solution in the paper of the year 2011 for a comparison to our DE341- IAU solution. The comparison also allows indirect assessments of Berger and Loutre solutions. The web interface at IMCEE, permits outputs from −100 Myr to +20 Myr from J2000.0, but at a minimum timestep of 100 yr; hence this is the maximal resolution of this data that we took into account, which is fine enough for our purposes. We compare mean daily insolation at July mid-month (i.e., λ(cid:12) t = 120 deg.) for 65◦N, i.e., as a continuous function of longitude, using the INSOLA-Q-W.for code. Fig. 21 shows this calculation for 12 kyr, from year −10000.0 to 2000.0. Whereas our results describe the short-term variations on W , La2010 solu- tion describes the mean variations (to make our results clearly visible at this 43 scale, we have decided do not graph La2010 solution from −12 kyr to −10 kyr, which describes the mean values of our DE431-IAU solution). A zoom between −10 kyr and −9.6 kyr from J2000.0, shows the excellent agreement of our result with La2010, and the effects of STOF on W . To show the differ- ences between continuous and tabulated values in our DE431-IAU solution, we performed the same calculation, using tabulated values at mid-day. Fig. 22 shows these differences in detail for the past 1 kyr. There are differences up to ± 0.3% which represents a maximum error of about 1.2 W m−2 for this particular July mid-month calculation. Hence, a user that calculated the mean daily insolation using La2010 solution, can have an error up to 1.2 W m−2 considering solar position at the noon time of the corresponding day, for July mid-month. As a final commentary, Loutre et al. (1992) had shown that the level of disagreement of their solution with the original solution from Berger (1978) can be as large as 10 W m−2 for 10 kyr to 5 kyr before 1950 AD; while the disagreement is more tolerable at level of less than 1 W m−2 for 5 kyr to present. Hence, our work presents a better agreement with respect to the state of the art solution by Laskar et al. (2011a). Our STOF solutions do not show evidence for any long-term growth in comparison to the La2010 solution; La2010 describes virtually the mean value of our STOF solution. The departure of our (continuously-varying-longitude) solution with respects to secular variations are indeed small, less than about ± 0.15 W m−2 over the full Holocene interval covered in our DE431-IAU solution. As an example, for this July comparison, the long-term La2010 value corresponding to −1 kyr from J2000.0 (obtained from web interface) is W = 430.162 W m−2, keeping 44 three decimal figures; our DE431-IAU solution (in continuous mode), for mid-July, i.e., with λ(cid:12) t = 120 deg. (which correspond to t = 1000.577 yr of our solution, with a true mid-day longitude of λ(cid:12) t = 119.673 deg.) give us W = 430.238 W m−2, a difference of less than −0.018%. For −10 kyr from J2000.0, La2010 gives W = 468.978 W m−2, whereas our solution gives W = 468.968 W m−2 (at t = −8000.2382 yr), a difference of ∼ 0.002%. This independent confirmation suggests that our solution can be applied for exploring any climate modeling experiments accounting fully for the STOF aspects of the orbital forcings previously not available publicly. 8. Summary We have presented a new set of calculations accurately accounting for all short-term orbital modulations that can be considered an improved rep- resentation of the boundary conditions relevant for any meteorological and climatic studies over the Holocene interval and 1 kyr into the future. We have reviewed the subject carefully and discussed all the steps and assumptions involved in our calculations. Our new orbital solutions, DE341-IAU, offer an internally self-consistent set of boundary conditions readily applicable for climate model simulation, attribution and even assimilation studies. The rich spatio-temporal dynamics of the persistent solar irradiation forcing of- fers a realistic accounting of all STOF dynamics suitable for the evaluation of all atmospheric, oceanic and coupled air-sea oscillations on timescales rang- ing from diurnal, fortnightly, monthly, sub-annual, seasonal, annual, QBO, ENSO, decadal to multidecadal timescales. We offer, for the first time, a detailed determination of the error com- 45 mitted using daily insolation quantities as a continuously varying longitude over the day (i.e., the most common practice in all paleoclimate modeling study thus far) with respect to the nominal (based on solar position at noon) values. We found errors up to 5% in daily insolation quantities, which cor- respond to an absolute difference of 2.5 W m−2 in W calculations, which are significantly larger than the theoretically expected error (i.e., 0.01 W m−2 reported in Berger et al., 2010) in the calculation of W . This error is of sim- ilar order as the uncertainty detected by Joussaume and Braconnot (1997) due to the "calendar effects" (i.e., 5-8 W m−2), which have been shown to be considerably consequential on climate modeling (see also Chen et al., 2011). However, when compared to the relatively well-documented calendar effect, it is important to note that our continuous-versus-tabulated longitude error is a different effect which can occur even in the same specific calendar day. Therefore, climate modelers have to be aware of these differences and how this particular error would spread and propagate along with time especially when intra-annual insolation quantities are required. The sensitivity of initial climate conditions to these differences should also be addressed. Our next step will be to incorporate a range of estimates of intrinsic changes in TSI for the past few thousand years as constrained both by solar activity proxies from paleoclimatic evidence as well as observational study of solar-type stars. The astro-climatic parameters database, the FORTRAN codes and all the solar radiation values will be made available to any scien- tists and climate modeling groups requesting for them. We will also make effort to install our solar radiation forcing outputs on several popular data archive centers including the one at NOAA/NCDC. Finally, after the com- 46 pletion of our calculation, we discover that another parallel and independent effort on tackling STOF has been ongoing in Russia by Fedorov (2015) where the author adopted the JPL DE 405/406 Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides covering the time interval from 3000 BC to 2999 AD. Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge the support of the grant UTN-3577 "Efectos Orbitales sobre la Irradiancia Solar Recibida Durante el Holoceno y los Pr´oximos 3000 Anos" (2015-2016) of the Universidad Tecnol´ogica Nacional, Argentina. The authors are indebted to William Folkner of NASA-JPL, for an open and deep discussion of DE-JPL ephemerides models and details. We also extend thanks to Jean-Louis Simon of Paris Observatory-IMCEE, France, for sharing one of his papers and valuable commentaries. Special thanks to John Chambers of Carnegie Institution of Washington, for sharing his Julian Day routine that is especially useful for negative years. Finally, we are grateful to Maria McEachern, the librarian at the John Wolbach library of the Center for Astrophysics, for valuable help. W.S.'s work is indirectly supported by SAO grant proposal ID 000000000003010-V101. W.S. would also like to acknowledge the influence by Dr. Duncan Steel's independent examination of the STOF question and to thank the late Bob Carter, Mi- lan Dimitrijevic, Monika Jurkovics, Laszlo Kiss, Katalin Olah, and Dmitry Sokoloff for helps and encouragements. 47 References Berger, A., 1978. Long-term variations of daily insolation and Quaternary climatic changes. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 35 (12), 2362–2367. Berger, A., 1988. Milankovitch theory and climate. Reviews of Geophysics 26, 624–657. Berger, A., 2012. A brief history of the astronomical theories of paleoclimates. In: Climate Change. Springer, pp. 107–129. Berger, A., Loutre, M. F., 1991. Insolation values for the climate of the last 10 million years. Quaternary Science Reviews 10, 297–317. Berger, A., Loutre, M.-F., Yin, Q., 2010. Total irradiation during any time interval of the year using elliptic integrals. Quaternary Science Reviews 29 (17), 1968–1982. Bertrand, C., Loutre, M.-F., Berger, A., 2002. High frequency variations of the Earth's orbital parameters and climate change. Geophysical Research Letters 29 (18), 40–1–40–4. Borisenkov, Y. P., Tsvetkov, A., Agaponov, S., 1983. On some characteristics of insolation changes in the past and the future. Climatic Change 5 (3), 237–244. Borisenkov, Y. P., Tsvetkov, A., Eddy, J. A., 1985. Combined effects of earth orbit perturbations and solar activity on terrestrial insolation. Part I: Sample days and annual mean values. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 42 (9), 933–940. 48 Bretagnon, P., Jan. 1974. Termes a longues p´eriodes dans le syst´eme solaire. Astronomy & Astrophysics 30, 141–154. Bretagnon, P., Oct. 1982. Theory for the motion of all the planets - The VSOP82 solution. Astronomy & Astrophysics 114, 278–288. Capitaine, N., Soffel, M., Aug. 2015. On the definition and use of the ecliptic in modern astronomy. In: Malkin, Z., Capitaine, N. (Eds.), Journ´ees 2014 "Syst`emes de r´ef´erence spatio-temporels". pp. 61–64. Chambers, J. E., 1999. A hybrid symplectic integrator that permits close encounters between massive bodies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 304 (4), 793–799. Chen, G.-S., Kutzbach, J., Gallimore, R., Liu, Z., 2011. Calendar effect on phase study in paleoclimate transient simulation with orbital forcing. Climate dynamics 37 (9-10), 1949–1960. Cionco, R. G., Abuin, P., 2016. On planetary torque signals and sub-decadal frequencies in the discharges of large rivers. Advances in Space Research 57 (6), 1411–1425. Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Fichefet, T., Friedling- stein, P., Gao, X., Gutowski, W., Johns, T., Krinner, G., Shongwe, M., Tebaldi, C., Weaver, A., Wehner, M., 2013. Long-term climate change: Projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P. (Eds.), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report 49 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p. 10291136. URL www.climatechange2013.org Cronin, T. W., 2014. On the choice of average solar zenith angle. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 71 (8), 2994–3003. Duriez, L., 2002. Cours de M´ecanique C´eleste classique. Laboratoire das- tronomie de luniversit´e de Lilles 1. Essex, C., 2011. Climate theory versus a theory for climate. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 21, 3477–3487. Fedorov, V., 2015. Spatial and temporal variations in solar climate of the Earth in the present epoch. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics 51 (8), 779–791. Fienga, A., Manche, H., Laskar, J., Gastineau, M., Jan. 2008. INPOP06: a new numerical planetary ephemeris. Astronomy & Astrophysics 477, 315– 327. Folkner, W. M., Williams, J. G., Boggs, D. H., Park, R. S., Kuchynka, P., Feb. 2014. The planetary and lunar ephemerides DE430 and DE431. Interplanetary Network Progress Report 196, 1–81. Ghil, M., Allen, M. R., Dettinger, M. D., Ide, K., Kondrashov, D., Mann, M. E., Robertson, A. W., Saunders, A., Tian, Y., Varadi, F., Yiou, P., Feb. 2002. Advanced spectral methods for climatic time series. Reviews of Geophysics 40, 3–1–3–41. 50 Goody, R., 2007. Maximum entropy production in climate theory. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64 (7), 2735–2739. Hansen, J. M., Aagaard, T., Kuijpers, A., 2015. Sea-level forcing by syn- chronization of 56-and 74-year oscillations with the Moon's nodal tide on the northwest European shelf (eastern North Sea to central Baltic Sea). Journal of Coastal Research 31 (5), 1041–1056. He, B., Wu, G., Liu, Y., Bao, Q., 2015. Astronomical and hydrological per- spective of mountain impacts on the Asian summer monsoon. Scientific Reports 5. Hersbach, H., Peubey, C., Simmons, A., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Dee, D., 2015. Era-20cm: a twentieth-century atmospheric model ensemble. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 141 (691), 2350–2375. Hogan, R. J., Hirahara, S., 2016. Effect of solar zenith angle specification in models on mean shortwave fluxes and stratospheric temperatures. Geo- physical Research Letters 43 (1), 482–488. Hudson, T., Horseman, A., Sugier, J., 2016. Diurnal, seasonal and 11–yr solar cycle variation effects on the virtual ionosphere reflection height and im- plications for the met office's lightning detection system, ATDnet. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 33, 1429–1441. IAU SOFA Board, 2016. IAU SOFA software collection. URL http://www.iausofa.org Imbrie, J., 1982. Astronomical theory of the Pleistocene ice ages: A brief historical review. Icarus 50 (2), 408–422. 51 Jajcay, N., Hlinka, J., Kravtsov, S., Tsonis, A. A., Palus, M., 2016. Time scales of the European surface air temperature variability: The role of the 7–8 year cycle. Geophysical Research Letters 43 (2), 902–909. Ji, F., Wu, Z., Huang, J., Chassignet, E. P., 2014. Evolution of land surface air temperature trend. Nature Climate Change 4, 462–466. Joussaume, S., Braconnot, P., 1997. Sensitivity of paleoclimate simulation re- sults to season definitions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 102 (D2), 1943–1956. Kaplan, G. H., 2006. The IAU resolutions on astronomical reference systems, time scales, and Earth rotation models. arXiv preprint astro-ph/0602086. Kinoshita, H., 1977. Theory of the rotation of the rigid Earth. Celestial Mechanics 15 (3), 277–326. Laskar, J., Mar. 1986. Secular terms of classical planetary theories using the results of general theory. Astronomy & Astrophysics 157, 59–70. Laskar, J., Jun. 1988. Secular evolution of the solar system over 10 million years. Astronomy & Astrophysics 198, 341–362. Laskar, J., 2013. Is the solar system stable? In: Duplantier, B., Nonnen- macher, S., Rivasseau, V. (Eds.), Chaos. Springer, pp. 239–270. Laskar, J., Fienga, A., Gastineau, M., Manche, H., 2011a. La2010: a new orbital solution for the long-term motion of the Earth. Astronomy & As- trophysics 532, A89. 52 Laskar, J., Gastineau, M., Delisle, J.-B., Farres, A., Fienga, A., 2011b. Strong chaos induced by close encounters with Ceres and Vesta. Astronomy & Astrophysics 532, L4. Laskar, J., Joutel, F., Boudin, F., 1993. Orbital, precessional, and insola- tion quantities for the Earth from -20 Myr to +10 Myr. Astronomy & Astrophysics 270, 522–533. Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., Gastineau, M., Correia, A., Levrard, B., 2004. A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth. Astronomy & Astrophysics 428 (1), 261–285. Li, Y., Han, W., Shinoda, T., Wang, C., Lien, R.-C., Moum, J. N., Wang, J.-W., 2013. Effects of the diurnal cycle in solar radiation on the tropi- cal indian ocean mixed layer variability during wintertime madden-julian oscillations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 118 (10), 4945–4964. Lieske, J., Lederle, T., Fricke, W., Morando, B., 1977. Expressions for the precession quantities based upon the IAU/1976/system of astronomical constants. Astronomy & Astrophysics 58, 1–16. Lin, M., Huybers, P., 2016. Revisting whether recent surface temperature trends agrew with the CMIP5 ensemble. Journal of Climate, in press. Lions, J., Manley, O., Temam, R., Wang, S., 1997. Physical interpretation of the attractor dimension for the primitive equations of atmospheric circu- lation. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 54 (9), 1137–1143. 53 Loutre, M.-F., Berger, A., Bretagnon, P., Blanc, P.-L., 1992. Astronomi- cal frequencies for climate research at the decadal to century time scale. Climate Dynamics 7 (4), 181–194. Mathews, P. M., Herring, T. A., Buffett, B. A., 2002. Modeling of nutation and precession: new nutation series for nonrigid Earth and insights into the Earth's interior. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 107 (B4). Mekaoui, S., Dewitte, S., Conscience, C., Chevalier, A., 2010. Total solar ir- radiance absolute level from DIARAD/SOVIM on the International Space Station. Advances in Space Research 45 (11), 1393–1406. Milankovi´c, M., 1941. Kanon der erdbestrahlung und seine anwendung auf das eiszeitenproblem (Canon of Insolation and the Ice-Age Problem). Acad. Roy. Serbian, Editions spec (1969 translation by the Israel Program for Scientific Translation; Edited by B. Benny and I. Meroz) 133, 1–484. Miller, R. L., Schmidt, G. A., Nazarenko, L. S., co authors, Apr. 2014. CMIP5 historical similations (1850-2012) with GISS ModelE2. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 6, 441–477. Monin, A. S., Shishkov, Y. A., Apr. 2000. Reviews of topical problems: Cli- mate as a problem of physics. Physics Uspekhi 43, 381–406. Morrison, L. V., Stephenson, F. R., 2004. Historical values of the Earth's clock error ∆t and the calculation of eclipses. Journal for the History of Astronomy 35, 327–336. Murray, C. D., Dermott, S. F., 1999. Solar system dynamics. Cambridge Univ. Press. 54 Neumann, J., 1985. Climatic change as a topic in the classical greek and roman literature. Climatic Change 7 (4), 441–454. Nicolis, C., Nicolis, G., 1995. From short-scale atmospheric variability to global climate dynamics: toward a systematic theory of averaging. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 52 (11), 1903–1913. Owen, W. M., 1990. A theory of the Earth's precession relative to the invari- able plane of the Solar System. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida. Petrovi´c, A., 2009. Revolution and insolation: How Milutin Milankovi´c has assembled the puzzle of the climate? Scientific Technical Review 59 (1), 3–10. Pitjeva, E. V., Pitjev, N. P., Aug. 2014. Development of planetary ephemerides EPM and their applications. Celestial Mechanics and Dy- namical Astronomy 119, 237–256. Roy, A. E., 1978. Orbital motion. IOP Publishing Ltd. Sharaf, S. G., Boudnikova, N., 1967. Secular variations of elements of the Earth's orbit which influences the climates of the geological past. Bull. Inst. Teor. Astron. Akad. Nauk SSSR 11, 231–261. Shinoda, T., 2005. Impact of diurnal cycle of solar radiation on intraseasonal SST variability in the Western Equatorial Pacific. Journal of Climate 18, 2628–2636. Simmons, A., Poli, P., Dee, D., Berrisford, P., Hersbach, H., Kobayashi, S., Peubey, C., 2014. Estimating low-frequency variability and trends in atmo- 55 spheric temperature using ERA-Interim. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 140 (679), 329–353. Simon, J.-L., Mar. 1987. Computation of the first and second derivatives of the Lagrange equations by harmonic analysis. Astronomy & Astrophysics 175, 303–308. Simon, J.-L., Francou, G., Fienga, A., Manche, H., 2013. New analytical planetary theories VSOP2013 and TOP2013. Astronomy & Astrophysics 557, A49. Soon, W., 2014. Sun shunned. In: Moran, A. (Ed.), Climate Change: The Facts 2014. Institute of Public Affairs, pp. 57–66. Soon, W., Connolly, R., Connolly, M., 2015. Re-evaluating the role of so- lar variability on northern hemisphere temperature trends since the 19th century. Earth-Science Reviews 150, 409–452. Souchay, J., Kinoshita, H., Aug. 1996. Corrections and new developments in rigid Earth nutation theory. I. Lunisolar influence including indirect planetary effects. Astronomy & Astrophysics 312, 1017–1030. Souchay, J., Kinoshita, H., Feb. 1997. Corrections and new developments in rigid-Earth nutation theory. II. Influence of second-order geopotential and direct planetary effect. Astronomy & Astrophysics 318, 639–652. Souchay, J., Loysel, B., Kinoshita, H., Folgueira, M., Feb. 1999. Corrections and new developments in rigid Earth nutation theory. III. Final tables "REN-2000" including crossed-nutation and spin-orbit coupling effects. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement 135, 111–131. 56 Standish, Jr., E. M., Oct. 1982. Orientation of the JPL Ephemerides, DE 200/LE 200, to the dynamical equinox of J2000. Astronomy & Astrophysics 114, 297–302. Steel, D., 2013. Perihelion precession, polar ice and global warming. Journal of Cosmology 22, 10106–10129. Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., von Schuckmann, K., Cheng, L., 2016. Insights into Earth's energy imbalance from multiple sources. Journal of Climate, in press. Vondr´ak, J., Capitaine, N., Wallace, P., 2011. New precession expressions, valid for long time intervals. Astronomy & Astrophysics 534, A22. Wilson, C., 1985. The great inequality of Jupiter and Saturn: from Kepler to Laplace. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 33, 15–290. 57 Table LIST - CAPTIONS Table 1: Mid-month W values at indicated latitudinal bands, for the year 1650, at the beginning of the Maunder Minimum interval of reduced sunspot activity; TSI0 = 1366.0 W m−2 (code MONTH − GEO.for). Each file corresponds to one month, from March to February. Table 1: Mid-month W values at indicated latitudinal bands, for the year 1650, at the beginning of the Maunder Minimum interval of reduced sunspot activity; TSI0 = 1366.0 W m−2 (code MONTH − GEO.for). Each file corresponds to one month, from March to February. 80◦S 65◦S 35◦S 0◦ 35◦N 65◦N 80◦N 479.093 457.392 495.965 421.104 216.929 16.487 0.000 273.664 327.543 439.656 435.016 280.267 75.693 0.000 75.854 184.610 357.826 436.825 357.826 184.610 75.854 0.000 73.207 271.054 420.713 425.199 316.770 264.660 0.000 15.558 204.709 397.381 468.027 431.626 452.106 0.000 2.744 179.712 385.755 481.757 480.005 518.599 0.000 15.497 203.867 395.742 466.091 429.836 450.227 0.000 72.683 269.130 417.732 422.190 314.535 262.799 75.240 183.117 354.932 433.292 354.932 183.117 75.240 271.797 325.287 436.611 431.991 278.309 75.155 0.000 477.195 455.571 493.975 419.403 216.045 16.413 0.000 554.521 513.252 515.122 412.469 192.155 2.933 0.000 58 FIGURES LIST - CAPTIONS (ALL FIGURES IN BLACK-WHITE) Fig. 1: A local fixed geocentric equatorial system (X, Y, Z) is defined; X directed towards the local meridian; minus Z axis directed towards the hemispheric pole (south, here). The minus Y axis points west. The positions of the observer's zenith and the Sun are also indicated. Fig. 2: Sketch of the Earth's orbit in the present time (reference epoch J2000.0). The Sun (with the usual astronomical symbol (cid:12)) is at the fo- cus. Nevertheless, to describe the apparent (also anti-clockwise), relative movements of the Sun with respect to Earth, we have marked the Sun pro- jections on the celestial sphere, specially for the corresponding solstices and equinoxes, which permit a determination of λ(cid:12) to be used in the insolation formulas. Also, the effect of the moving position of equinoxes (from γ0 of the epoch to γ of the date) is marked with an arrow. The dotted segment q − A is the apsidal line which determines the perihelia (q) and aphelia (A). The direction to the ecliptic's pole is C. The Earth's equator is drawn over the gray terrestrial sphere, and its continuation determines the Sun's declination (δ) with the Sun-Earth radiovector (r). In addition, the Earth terrestrial pole direction is marked, which help defines the obliquity . The Earth's true longitude and the longitude of the perihelion, both of the epoch of ref- erence, are also indicated. Fig. 3: Precessional elements measured with respect to the fiducial J2000.0 epoch. The mean equator of reference (J2000.0) and the mean equa- 59 tor of the date, are indicated. The nodal point N is the intersection of the two ecliptics: Eo of the reference epoch, and Et the ecliptic of the date. The general precession in longitude accumulated from J2000.0 is pA (i.e., the seg- ment from the projection of γ0 on Et, to γ point). See the main text for descriptions of other angles. Fig. 4: The spherical triangle used to find the "true general precession" and obliquity of the date is shown. The Ω and i elements coming from DE431 define the plane of the Earth's orbit of the date with respect to the reference epoch (J2000.0). See the text for more details. Fig. 5: Short-term evolution of the Earth's eccentricity over 13 kyr (one datum per 120 d). The last 500 yr, from 1950, is illustrated in the insert with expanded details. Fig. 6: Short-term evolution of the Earth's longitude of the perihelion over 13 kyr (one datum per 120 d). The last 500 yr, from 1950, is illustrated in the insert with expanded details. Fig. 7: Short-term evolution of the Earth's climatic precession over 13 kyr (one datum per 120 d). The last 500 yr, from 1950, is illustrated in the insert with expanded details. Fig. 8: Short-term evolution of the Earth's obliquity over 13 kyr (one datum per 120 d). The last 500 yr, from 1950, is illustrated in the insert 60 with expanded details. Fig. 9: MTM power spectrum of the raw data from the simulated per- turbations on Earth's eccentricity by Venus to Saturn over 1 kyr (from 1000 to 2000 AD). The labels mark the main recognized perturbations. P, P2 and P3 refer to perturbations peaks with confidence level less than 95% which are related to planet Mars. One un-labeled peak between P2 and 2V-3E seems to be associated with the 4E-7Ma inequality. The other un-labeled but significant peaks are harmonics of labeled perturbations. Fig. 10: MTM power spectrum for the short-term eccentricity variations based on the detrended data series after removing a parabolic long-term trend. The basic periodicities identified in Fig. 9 can also be detected here. Fig. 11: MTM power spectrum of the detrended obliquity time series. The main periodicities are identified (see discussion in the main text). Other periodicities are from harmonics and non-linear mixing of frequencies. Fig. 12: Daily mean irradiation at 65◦N over the indicated calendar in- terval for equinoxes; i.e., λ(cid:12) t = 0, 180 deg. The solar constant used was 1366 W m−2. Fig. 13: The same as Fig. 12 but for solstices; i.e., λ(cid:12) t = 90, 270 deg. The solar constant used was 1366 W m−2. 61 Fig. 14: W at July mid-month; i.e., λ(cid:12) t = 120 deg., for 65◦N. The time interval corresponds closest to the one considered in Loutre et al. (1992)'s Fig. 12a. This comparison shows a very good agreement with their results. Solar constant used was 1366 W m−2. Fig. 15: MTM spectrum of W (over detrended time series) at July mid- month, 65◦N. The main periodicities are identified and are described in the main text. At lower latitudes, the periodicities arising from the obliquity signals are weakened. Fig. 16: Relative difference in W calculation as a continuous λ(cid:12) t or using tabulated values at mid-day, for solstices (λ(cid:12) t = 90, 270 deg.). At these mo- ments, when the Sun is stationary, the errors are small, but they can reach 0.2%. Fig. 17: The same as Fig. 16 but for equinoxes (λ(cid:12) t = 0, 180 deg.). The error is larger on average by one order of magnitude (or about 1.2 %) when compared to the errors during solstices. Fig. 18: Relative difference in the W calculation as a function of λ(cid:12) t over the 13 kyr interval we studied (for 65◦N). Around the solstice of December, the relative error can reach 5% but drop to the level of less than 0.1% at 270 deg. 62 Fig. 19: W calculation as a continuous λ(cid:12) t (lines) or using tabulated values at mid-day (dots), for λ(cid:12) t= 250 deg. (for 65◦N), from 1000 to 2000 AD. The absolute difference is less than 0.3 W m−2. Fig. 20: Difference W −W0 in mean daily insolation calculation as a func- tion of λ(cid:12) t for the 13 kyr interval we studied (for 65◦N). At boreal spring and at the end of the boreal summer, the absolute difference can reach 2.5 W m−2 (see the text for more explanation). Fig. 21: W at July mid-month (λ(cid:12) t = 120 deg.), for 65◦N: this work, DE431-IAU (dashed lines); Laskar et al. (2011a) solution, La2010 (points). The comparison is shown starting at −10 kyr with expanded details of the intercomparison illustrated in the insert. The solar constant used was 1366.0 W m−2. Fig. 22: W at July mid-month (λ(cid:12) t = 120 deg.), for 65 ◦N: DE431- IAU solution, continuous values (dashed lines); La2010 data (points) and DE431-IAU solution, with tabulated values (dots). Differences between the continuous and tabulated values can reach ± 0.3%; i.e., approximately ± 1.2 W m−2. 63 Figure 1: A local fixed geocentric equatorial system (X, Y, Z) is defined; X directed to- wards the local meridian; minus Z axis directed towards the hemispheric pole (south, here). The minus Y axis points west. The positions of the observer's zenith and the Sun are also indicated. 64 Figure 2: Sketch of the Earth's orbit in the present time (reference epoch J2000.0). The Sun (with the usual astronomical symbol (cid:12)) is at the focus. Nevertheless, to describe the apparent (also anti-clockwise), relative movements of the Sun with respect to Earth, we have marked the Sun projections on the celestial sphere, specially for the corresponding solstices and equinoxes, which permit a determination of λ(cid:12) to be used in the insolation formulas. Also, the effect of the moving position of equinoxes (from γ0 of the epoch to γ of the date) is marked with an arrow. The dotted segment q − A is the apsidal line which determines the perihelia (q) and aphelia (A). The direction to the ecliptic's pole is C. The Earth's equator is drawn over the gray terrestrial sphere, and its continuation determines the Sun's declination (δ) with the Sun-Earth radiovector (r). In addition, the Earth terrestrial pole direction is marked, which help defines the obliquity . The Earth's 65 true longitude and the longitude of the perihelion, both of the epoch of reference, are also indicated. Figure 3: Precessional elements measured with respect to the fiducial J2000.0 epoch. The mean equator of reference (J2000.0) and the mean equator of the date, are indicated. The nodal point N is the intersection of the two ecliptics: Eo of the reference epoch, and Et the ecliptic of the date. The general precession in longitude accumulated from J2000.0 is pA (i.e., the segment from the projection of γ0 on Et, to γ point). See the main text for descriptions of other angles. 66 Figure 4: The spherical triangle used to find the "true general precession" and obliquity of the date is shown. The Ω and i elements coming from DE431 define the plane of the Earth's orbit of the date with respect to the reference epoch (J2000.0). See the text for more details. 67 Figure 5: Short-term evolution of the Earth's eccentricity over 13 kyr (one datum per 120 d). The last 500 yr, from 1950, is illustrated in the insert with expanded details. 68 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.02 0.021−120−100−80−60−40−20 0EccentricityTime (Julian centuries from 2000.0)−4−3−2−1Figure 6: Short-term evolution of the Earth's longitude of the perihelion over 13 kyr (one datum per 120 d). The last 500 yr, from 1950, is illustrated in the insert with expanded details. 69 −100−50 0 50 100 150−120−100−80−60−40−20 0 ϖt [deg]Time (Julian centuries from 2000.0)−4−3−2−1Figure 7: Short-term evolution of the Earth's climatic precession over 13 kyr (one datum per 120 d). The last 500 yr, from 1950, is illustrated in the insert with expanded details. 70 −0.025−0.02−0.015−0.01−0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02−120−100−80−60−40−20 0e sin(ϖt)Time (Julian centuries from 2000.0)−4−3−2−1Figure 8: Short-term evolution of the Earth's obliquity over 13 kyr (one datum per 120 d). The last 500 yr, from 1950, is illustrated in the insert with expanded details. 71 23.3 23.4 23.5 23.6 23.7 23.8 23.9 24 24.1 24.2 24.3−120−100−80−60−40−20 0 εt [deg]Time (Julian centuries from 2000.0)−4−3−2−1Figure 9: MTM power spectrum of the raw data from the simulated perturbations on Earth's eccentricity by Venus to Saturn over 1 kyr (from 1000 to 2000 AD). The labels mark the main recognized perturbations. P, P2 and P3 refer to perturbations peaks with confidence level less than 95% which are related to planet Mars. One un-labeled peak between P2 and 2V-3E seems to be associated with the 4E-7Ma inequality. The other un-labeled but significant peaks are harmonics of labeled perturbations. 72 10−1510−1410−1310−1210−1110−1010−910−810−7 2 4 8 16 32V−2E2V−3E5V−8EJ3V−5EE−2MaSPP3P2Raw power spectra (V,E,Ma,J,S)period [yr]MTM of excentricityMTM 99% conf.MTM 95% conf.Figure 10: MTM power spectrum for the short-term eccentricity variations based on the detrended data series after removing a parabolic long-term trend. The basic periodicities identified in Fig. 9 can also be detected here. 73 10−1310−1210−1110−1010−910−810−710−610−510−410−3 2 4 8 16 32V−2E2V−3E5V−8EJ3V−5EE−2Ma 4E−7MaP2SPP32S2J3UP4P5Eccentricity − Power spectra (detrended data)Period [yr]MTMMTM 99% conf.MTM 95% conf.Figure 11: MTM power spectrum of the detrended obliquity time series. The main periodicities are identified (see discussion in the main text). Other periodicities are from harmonics and non-linear mixing of frequencies. 74 10−1410−1210−1010−810−610−410−2 2 4 8 16 32V−2E5V−8EJ3V−5E2S18.6 = MΩ3V−5E2J2V−3E2MΩS2.47 = 2E−3Ma4E−7Ma3E−5Ma8.85Obliquity − Power spectra (detrended data)Period [yr]MTMMTM 99% conf.MTM 95% conf.Figure 12: Daily mean irradiation at 65◦N over the indicated calendar interval for equinoxes; i.e., λ(cid:12) t = 0, 180 deg. The solar constant used was 1366 W m−2. 75 182183184185186800100012001400160018002000YearsMarch182183184185186W [W m-2]Mean daily irradiation at 65N - EquinoxesSeptemberFigure 13: The same as Fig. 12 but for solstices; i.e., λ(cid:12) t = 90, 270 deg. The solar constant used was 1366 W m−2. 76 477478479480800100012001400160018002000YearsJune234W [W m-2]Mean daily irradiation at 65N - SolsticesDecemberFigure 14: W at July mid-month; i.e., λ(cid:12) t = 120 deg., for 65◦N. The time interval corre- sponds closest to the one considered in Loutre et al. (1992)'s Fig. 12a. This comparison shows a very good agreement with their results. Solar constant used was 1366 W m−2. 77 427 427.5 428 428.5 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900TSI0 = 1366.0 W m-2Mean daily irradiance at 65N [W m-2]YearsJuly - 120 deg.Figure 15: MTM spectrum of W (over detrended time series) at July mid-month, 65◦N. The main periodicities are identified and are described in the main text. At lower latitudes, the periodicities arising from the obliquity signals are weakened. 78 10−810−710−610−510−410−310−210−1100101 2 4 8 16 3229.3918.6315.7611.868.097.885.925.263.983.5632.692.42W 65N, July − MTM power spectraPeriod [yr]MTMMTM 99% conf.MTM 95% conf.Figure 16: Relative difference in W calculation as a continuous λ(cid:12) t or using tabulated values at mid-day, for solstices (λ(cid:12) t = 90, 270 deg.). At these moments, when the Sun is stationary, the errors are small, but they can reach 0.2%. 79 -0.015-0.01-0.00500.0050.010.015-10000-8000-6000-4000-200002000YearsJune-0.015-0.01-0.00500.0050.010.015(W-W0)/W0Solstices - 65NDecemberFigure 17: The same as Fig. 16 but for equinoxes (λ(cid:12) t = 0, 180 deg.). The error is larger on average by one order of magnitude (or about 1.2 %) when compared to the errors during solstices. 80 -0.015-0.01-0.00500.0050.010.015-10000-8000-6000-4000-200002000YearsMarch-0.015-0.01-0.00500.0050.010.015(W-W0)/W0Equinoxes - 65NSeptemberFigure 18: Relative difference in the W calculation as a function of λ(cid:12) t over the 13 kyr interval we studied (for 65◦N). Around the solstice of December, the relative error can reach 5% but drop to the level of less than 0.1% at 270 deg. 81 -0.04-0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400(W-W0)/W0Solar true longitude [deg.]Figure 19: W calculation as a continuous λ(cid:12) t (lines) or using tabulated values at mid-day (dots), for λ(cid:12) t= 250 deg. (for 65◦N), from 1000 to 2000 AD. The absolute difference is less than 0.3 W m−2. 82 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000Mean daily irradiance at 65N [W m-2]YearsSolar true longitue = 250 degWW0Figure 20: Difference W − W0 in mean daily insolation calculation as a function of λ(cid:12) t for the 13 kyr interval we studied (for 65◦N). At boreal spring and at the end of the boreal summer, the absolute difference can reach 2.5 W m−2 (see the text for more explanation). 83 -3-2-1 0 1 2 3 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400(W-W0) [W m-2]Solar true longitude [deg.]Figure 21: W at July mid-month (λ(cid:12) t = 120 deg.), for 65◦N: this work, DE431-IAU (dashed lines); Laskar et al. (2011a) solution, La2010 (points). The comparison is shown starting at −10 kyr with expanded details of the intercomparison illustrated in the insert. The solar constant used was 1366.0 W m−2. 84 425 430 435 440 445 450 455 460 465 470-12-10-8-6-4-2 0La2010DE431-IAUJuly Mid-month Insolation [W m-2]Milennia from J2000.0 468.85 468.9 468.95 469 469.05 469.1 469.15-10-9.8-9.6Figure 22: W at July mid-month (λ(cid:12) t = 120 deg.), for 65 ◦N: DE431-IAU solution, continuous values (dashed lines); La2010 data (points) and DE431-IAU solution, with tabulated values (dots). Differences between the continuous and tabulated values can reach ± 0.3%; i.e., approximately ± 1.2 W m−2. 85 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2 0July Mid-month Insolation [W m-2]Milennia from J2000.0DE431-IAU tabDE431-IAU contLa2010
1701.01303	1	1701	2017-01-05T13:01:38	The Spitzer search for the transits of HARPS low-mass planets - II. Null results for 19 planets	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.IM" ]	Short-period super-Earths and Neptunes are now known to be very frequent around solar-type stars. Improving our understanding of these mysterious planets requires the detection of a significant sample of objects suitable for detailed characterization. Searching for the transits of the low-mass planets detected by Doppler surveys is a straightforward way to achieve this goal. Indeed, Doppler surveys target the most nearby main-sequence stars, they regularly detect close-in low-mass planets with significant transit probability, and their radial velocity data constrain strongly the ephemeris of possible transits. In this context, we initiated in 2010 an ambitious Spitzer multi-Cycle transit search project that targeted 25 low-mass planets detected by radial velocity, focusing mainly on the shortest-period planets detected by the HARPS spectrograph. We report here null results for 19 targets of the project. For 16 planets out of 19, a transiting configuration is strongly disfavored or firmly rejected by our data for most planetary compositions. We derive a posterior probability of 83% that none of the probed 19 planets transits (for a prior probability of 22%), which still leaves a significant probability of 17% that at least one of them does transit. Globally, our Spitzer project revealed or confirmed transits for three of its 25 targeted planets, and discarded or disfavored the transiting nature of 20 of them. Our light curves demonstrate for Warm Spitzer excellent photometric precisions: for 14 targets out of 19, we were able to reach standard deviations that were better than 50ppm per 30 min intervals. Combined with its Earth-trailing orbit, which makes it capable of pointing any star in the sky and to monitor it continuously for days, this work confirms Spitzer as an optimal instrument to detect sub-mmag-deep transits on the bright nearby stars targeted by Doppler surveys.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. aa29270 August 10, 2018 c(cid:13) ESO 2018 7 1 0 2 n a J 5 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 3 0 3 1 0 . 1 0 7 1 : v i X r a The Spitzer search for the transits of HARPS low-mass planets - II. Null results for 19 planets⋆ M. Gillon1, B.-O. Demory2,3, C. Lovis4, D. Deming5, D. Ehrenreich4, G. Lo Curto6, M. Mayor4, F. Pepe4, D. Queloz3,4, S. Seager7, D. S´egransan4, S. Udry4 1 Space sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute, Universit´e de Li`ege, All´ee du 6 Aout 17, Bat. B5C, 4000 Li`ege, Belgium 2 University of Bern, Center for Space and Habitability, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland 3 Cavendish Laboratory, J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK 4 Observatoire de Gen`eve, Universit´e de Gen`eve, 51 Chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland 5 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2421, USA 6 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, D-85478 Garching bei Munchen, Germany 7 Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Received date / accepted date ABSTRACT Short-period super-Earths and Neptunes are now known to be very frequent around solar-type stars. Improving our understanding of these mysterious planets requires the detection of a significant sample of objects suitable for detailed characterization. Searching for the transits of the low-mass planets detected by Doppler surveys is a straightforward way to achieve this goal. Indeed, Doppler surveys target the most nearby main-sequence stars, they regularly detect close-in low-mass planets with significant transit probability, and their radial velocity data constrain strongly the ephemeris of possible transits. In this context, we initiated in 2010 an ambitious Spitzer multi-Cycle transit search project that targeted 25 low-mass planets detected by radial velocity, focusing mainly on the shortest-period planets detected by the HARPS spectrograph. We report here null results for 19 targets of the project. For 16 planets out of 19, a transiting configuration is strongly disfavored or firmly rejected by our data for most planetary compositions. We derive a posterior probability of 83% that none of the probed 19 planets transits (for a prior probability of 22%), which still leaves a significant probability of 17% that at least one of them does transit. Globally, our Spitzer project revealed or confirmed transits for three of its 25 targeted planets, and discarded or disfavored the transiting nature of 20 of them. Our light curves demonstrate for Warm Spitzer excellent photometric precisions: for 14 targets out of 19, we were able to reach standard deviations that were better than 50ppm per 30 min intervals. Combined with its Earth-trailing orbit, which makes it capable of pointing any star in the sky and to monitor it continuously for days, this work confirms Spitzer as an optimal instrument to detect sub-mmag-deep transits on the bright nearby stars targeted by Doppler surveys. Key words. binaries: eclipsing -- planetary systems -- stars: individual: BD-061339, HD 1461, HD 10180, HD 13808, HD 20003, HD 20781, HD 31527, HD 39194, HD 45184, HD 47186, HD 51608, HD 93385, HD 96700, HD 115617, HD 125612, HD 134060, HD 181433, HD 215497, HD 219828 - techniques: radial velocity - techniques: photometric 1. Introduction Starting from 2004 (Butler et al. 2004, Santos et al. 2004), exoplanet search projects have been detecting planets of a few to ∼20 Earth masses at an ever-increasing rate, re- vealing them to be very frequent around solar-like stars (e.g. Howard et al. 2012) where they tend to form compact multiple systems (Rowe et al. 2014). Based on their mass (or minimal mass for planets detected by radial velocity - RV), these objects are loosely classified as super-Earths (Mp ≤ 10M⊕) and Neptunes (Mp > 10M⊕). This divi- sion is based on the theoretical limit for the runaway ac- cretion of H/He by a protoplanet, ∼ 10M⊕ (Rafikov 2006), and thus implicitly assumes that Neptunes are predomi- nantly ice giants and that most super-Earths are massive terrestrial planets. However, the growing sample of transit- ing low-mass exoplanets with precise mass and radius mea- surements exhibit a wide diversity of densities that reveals a very heterogeneous population, making simplistic infer- ences hazardous when based on the comparison with solar system planets. A better understanding of this ubiquitous class of planets requires the thorough characterization of a significant sample, not only the precise measurements of their physical dimensions but also the exploration of their atmospheric composition to alleviate the strong degenera- cies of composition models in this mass range (e.g. Seager et al. 2007, Valencia et al. 2013). Send offprint requests to: [email protected] ⋆ The photometric and radial velocity time series used in this work are only available in electronic form at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/qcat?J/A+A/ Among the known transiting low-mass planets, GJ 436 b (Butler et al. 2004, Gillon et al. 2007) and GJ 1214 b (Charbonneau et al. 2009) are the most thoroughly char- acterized planets in the Neptune and super-Earth mass 1 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search ranges, respectively, thanks to the small size (∼ 0.45 and 0.2 R⊙) and proximity (about a dozen of pc) of their M-dwarf host stars. First constraints on their atmospheric proper- ties have indeed been obtained by several programs (e.g. Kreidberg et al. 2014, Knutson et al. 2014a, Ehrenreich et al. 2015). Extending this kind of detailed studies to Neptunes and super-Earths orbiting solar-type hosts re- quires the detection of such planets in transit in front of ex- tremely bright and nearby stars. A straightforward method to achieve this goal is to search for the transits of the low- mass planets detected by RV surveys. Indeed, these sur- veys target the most nearby main-sequence stars, and they have now detected enough short-period low-mass planets to make it highly probable that a handful of them transit their parent stars, as demonstrated by the previous detec- tions by the MOST space telescope of the transits of the super-Earths 55 Cnc e (Winn et al. 2011)1. Thanks to the brightness of their host stars, the atmospheric characteriza- tion of these two planets has already started (e.g. Demory et al. 2012, Knutson et al. 2014b). More recently, the same approach enabled us to reveal with Spitzer the transiting configuration of the rocky planet HD 219134 b (Motalebi et al. 2015) which, at 6.5pc, is the nearest known transiting exoplanet. Searching for the transits of RV low-mass planets is one of the main objectives of the future European space mission CHEOPS (Broeg et al. 2013). However, CHEOPS is not due to launch before the end of 2017. To set it on its path, back in 2010 we set up an ambitious project using Spitzer/IRAC (Fazio et al. 2004) to search for the transits of the RV low- mass planets that have the highest geometric transit proba- bilities, focusing mainly on the shortest-period planets de- tected by the HARPS spectrograph (Mayor et al. 2003). Our Spitzer transit search was composed of a cryogenic program targeting HD 40307 b (ID 495, 27.5hr), and three so-called Warm (i.e. non cryogenic) programs (ID 60027, 90072, and 11180; 100hr, 300hr, and 9.5hr) that targeted 24 other RV low-mass planets. Its published results have so far been the non-detection of the transits of HD 40307 b (Gillon et al. 2010, hereafter G10) and GJ 3634 b (Bonfils et al. 2011), the detection and confirmation of the tran- sits of 55 Cnc e (Demory et al. 2011, Gillon et al. 2012a), the confirmation of the transiting nature of HD 97658 b (Van Grootel et al. 2014), and the detection of a transit of HD 219134 b (Motalebi et al. 2015). Results for another planet will be presented in a forthcoming paper (S´egransan et al., in prep.) We report here null results for the 19 other targets of the project. We first present our targets and our determination of their transit ephemeris. In Sect. 3, we present our Spitzer data and their reduction. Section 4 describes our data anal- ysis. Its main results are presented in Sect. 5. Finally, we discuss our global results and give our conclusions in Sect. 6. 2. Targets and transit ephemeris determination Table 1 and Tables A.1 to A.4 list the 19 targets of this work. For each target, we performed an analysis of the avail- able RVs, including new measurements for some of them 1 Our Spitzer program independently revealed the transit- ing nature of 55 Cnc e (Demory et al. 2011). and HD 97658 b (Dragomir et al. 2013) 2 gathered by HARPS2, to derive the most accurate tran- sit ephemeris. This analysis was done with the adaptative Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) algorithm described in G10 (see also Gillon et al. 2012a, 2012b, 2014). Our nom- inal model was based on a star and one or several planets on Keplerian orbits around their common center of mass. For some cases, we added a linear or quadratic trend to the model, based on the minimization of the Bayesian in- formation criterion (BIC, Schwarz 1974) to elect our final model. We checked that planet-planet interactions had neg- ligible influence on our solutions, using, for this purpose, the Systemic Console software (Meschiari et al. 2009). We also used this software to perform an initial optimization of parameters to check that no solution existed with a higher likelihood than the published one. During this initial stage of the analysis, the RV errors were assumed to be measure- ment uncertainties. Once this initial stage was completed, we measured the quadrature difference between the rms of the residuals and the mean error, and this "jitter noise" (Wright 2005) was quadratically summed to the measure- ment uncertainties. We then performed a MCMC analy- sis to probe the posterior probability distribution functions (PDF) of the model and physical parameters Each MCMC analysis was composed of five Markov chains of 105 steps, the first 20% of each being considered as its burn-in phase and discarded. For each run, the con- vergence of the five Markov chains was checked using the statistical test of Gelman & Rubin (1992). The resulting posterior PDFs for the transit time and period were then used to schedule the Spitzer observations, with monitoring the 2 − σ transit window as the goal, i.e. keeping the prob- ability to miss a transit below 5%. Even if the resulting posterior PDFs for the orbital eccentricity of most target planets were compatible with zero, we did not assume a purely circular orbit for them to ensure the reliability of our derived transit ephemeris. Indeed, several examples of low-mass exoplanets with sig- nificantly eccentric few-days orbits (e.g. GJ 436 b, HAT-P- 11 b, HD215497 b) remind us of the risks of systematically assuming circular orbits for close-in exoplanets based on tidal circularization arguments. An established theory for tidal dissipation mechanisms is still a long-term goal, and reaching it relies mostly on gathering new observational constraints. Once the Spitzer observations had been performed for a planet, we made a second MCMC analysis of the most up- to-date RV dataset, this time with the fitted transit time corresponding to the epoch covered by the Spitzer run. The purpose of this analysis was to derive the most accurate or- bital parameters, transit ephemeris, and minimal masses for the planets under consideration. Indeed, for most of them HARPS gathered a significant number of RV measurements between the scheduling of the Spitzer observations and the final analysis of the Spitzer images. Tables A.1 to A.4 present the results obtained for each targeted planet from these MCMC analyses of the most up- to-date RV dataset. In addition to some basic parameters for the host stars, these tables give the origin of the RVs used as input in our MCMC analysis for each target, and provide the most relevant results of our MCMC analysis: 2 Most HARPS measurements in are on the ESO/HARPS online http://archive.eso.org/wdb/wdb/eso/repro/form available used this work at archive M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search the transit and occultation ephemeris, the minimal mass, the expected minimum transit depth corresponding to a pure iron planet (Seager et al. 2007), the equilibrium day- side temperature, the orbital parameters, and the expected duration for a central transit. The radius of the star was de- rived from the luminosity and effective temperature, taking bolometric corrections from Flower (1996). Tables A.1 to A.4 also present the median value and the 1-σ errors for the prior transit probability. It was computed at each step of the MCMC with the following formula: P (tr) = (cid:18) R∗ a (cid:19)(cid:18) 1 + e sin ω 1 − e2 (cid:19), (1) where R∗ is the stellar radius, a is the orbital semi-major axis, e is the orbital eccentricity and ω is the argument of periastron. This probability estimate does not take into account that planets are more likely to be discovered by RV if their orbit is significantly inclined (e.g. Wisniewski et al. 2012). By performing Bayesian simulations that as- sume different prior PDFs for the planetary masses, Stevens & Gaudi (2013) have shown that this bias increases the transit probability of short-period low-mass RV planets like the ones considered here by only ∼20% in average. Furthermore, its actual estimation for a given planet de- pends strongly on the assumed prior PDFs for the plane- tary masses. We have thus neglected it in the context of this work. target in Tables A.5 to A.11. These tables also give the ver- sion of the Spitzer pipeline used to calibrate the correspond- ing images, the resulting files being called basic calibrated data (BCD) in the Spitzer nomenclature. Each subarray mode BCD is composed of a cube of 64 subarray images of 32×32 pixels (pixel scale = 1.2 arc second). The following reduction strategy was used for all the Spitzer AOR. We first converted fluxes from the Spitzer units of specific intensity (MJy/sr) to photon counts, then aperture photometry was performed on each subarray im- age with the IRAF/DAOPHOT5 software (Stetson, 1987). For each AOR, we tested different aperture radii and back- ground annuli, and selected the combination minimizing the white and red noises in the residuals of a short data fitting analysis. The center and width of the point-spread functions (PSF) were measured by fitting a 2D-Gaussian profile on each image. The x − y distribution of the mea- surements was then studied, and measurements that had a visually discrepant position relative to the bulk of the data were then discarded. For each block of 64 subarray images, we then discarded the discrepant values for the measure- ments of flux, background, x- and y-positions using a 10-σ median clipping for the four parameters, and the resulting values were averaged, the photometric errors being taken as the errors on the average flux measurements. Finally, a 50- σ slipping median clipping was used on the resulting light curves to discard outliers (owing to, for example, cosmic hits). 3. Warm Spitzer photometry Tables A.5 to A.11 provide a summary of the Spitzer ob- servations. Since all our targets are very bright (K between 2.96 and 6.90), all of them were observed in subarray mode (32x32 pixels windowing of the detector), the extremely fast Fowler sampling (∼0.01s), which maximizes the duty cycle and signal-to-noise ratio (S/N). No dithering pattern was applied to the telescope (continuous staring). For each tar- get, the exposure time was selected to maximize the S/N while staying in the linear regime of the detector, basing on the Warm Spitzer flux density estimator tool3 and on the instructions of the Warm Spitzer Observer Manual4. The observations of program 60027 (Cycle 6) and 90072 (Cycle 9) were performed between 2009 Dec 14 and 2010 Sep 11, and between 2012 Dec 03 and 2014 May 14, re- spectively. For several of the Cycle 9 targets, we benefitted from the newly introduced PCRS peak-up mode (Ingalls et al. 2012). This mode provides enhanced accuracy in the position of the target on the detector, to a significant de- crease of the so-called 'pixel phase effect' that is the most important source of correlated noise in high-S/N staring mode observation with IRAC InSb arrays (e.g. Knutson et al. 2008). For HD 1461 b, we supplemented our data with the IRAC 4.5µm observations presented by Kammer et al. (2014), as described in Sect. 5.2. On a practical level, each observation run was divided in one or several science astronomical observational requests (AOR) of 12hr at most, preceded by a short (20-30 min) AOR to allow the pointing of the telescope and the instru- ment to stabilize. The IDs of all AORs are given for each 3 http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/warmmission/propkit/pet/starpet 4 http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/warmmission/propkit/som 4. Global Warm Spitzer + RV data analysis We analyzed the Spitzer photometric time-series supple- mented by the RVs with our MCMC code. For each target, our model for the RVs was the same as the one presented in Sect. 2. The assumed photometric model consisted of the eclipse model of Mandel & Agol (2002) to represent the possible eclipses of the probed planets, multiplied for each light curve by a baseline model that aimed to repre- sent the other astrophysical and instrumental effects at the source of photometric variations. We assumed a quadratic limb-darkening law for the stars. For each light curve that corresponded to a specific AOR, we based the selection of the baseline model on the minimization of the BIC. Tables A.5 to A.11 present the baseline function elected for each AOR. Following Gillon et al. (2014), the instrumental mod- els included three types of low-order polynomials. The first one had as variables the x- and y-positions of the center of the PSF to represent the so-called pixel phase effect of the IRAC InSb arrays (e.g. Knutson et al. 2008). The second one had the PSF widths in the x- and/or the y-direction as variables, its inclusion in the baseline model strongly in- creasing the quality of the fit for all AORs (the so-called PSF breathing effect, see also Lanotte et al. 2014). The third function was a polynomial of the logarithm of time to represent a sharp increase of the detector response at the start of some AORs (the so-called ramp effect, Knutson et al. 2008). To improve the quality of the modeling of the pixel phase effect, especially the fitting of its highest fre- 5 IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. 3 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search quency components,for most AORs we supplemented the x- and y-polynomial with the bi-linearly-interpolated sub- pixel sensitivity (BLISS) mapping method (Stevenson et al. 2012). The sampling of the position space was selected so that at least five measurements fall within the same sub- pixel. See Gillon et al. (2014) for more details. The jump parameters of the MCMC, i.e. the parameters randomly perturbed at each step of the Markov Chains, were as follows: -- The stellar mass M∗, radius R∗, effective temperature Tef f , and metallicity [Fe/H]. For these four parameters, normal prior PDFs were assumed based on the values given in Tables A.1-4. -- For the potential transiting planet, the parameter b′ = a cos i/R∗, where a is the orbital semi-major axis and i is the orbital inclination. b′ would correspond to the transit impact parameter in the case of a circular orbit. The step was rejected if b′ > a/R∗. For the other planets of the system, b′ was fixed to 0. -- The parameter K2 = K√1 − e2 P 1/3 for all planets of the system, K being the RV orbital semi-amplitude, e the orbital eccentricity, and P the orbital period. -- The orbital period P of each planet. -- For each planet, the two parameters √e cos ω and √e sin ω, e being the orbital eccentricity and ω being the argument of periastron. -- The planet/star area ratio dF = (Rp/R∗)2 for the po- tential transiting planet. At each step of the MCMC, the planetary radius corresponding to a pure iron composi- tion was computed under the formalism given by Seager et al. (2007), and if the planetary radius derived from dF and R∗ was smaller, the step was rejected. A sim- ilar rejection was done for Rp > 11R⊕, an implausibly large size for the low-mass planets considered here. The goal of these prior constraints on Rp was to avoid fit- ting extremely shallow transits and ultra-grazing tran- sits of unrealistically big planets in the correlated noise of the light curves to ensure an unbiased posterior tran- sit probability. For the other planets of the multiple sys- tems, dF was fixed to 0. In all cases, we checked that a transit of another planet of these systems was not expected to occur during the Spitzer observations. -- The time of inferior conjunction T0 for all planets of the system. For the potential transiting planets that we considered, T0 corresponds approximatively to the mid- time of the transit searched for by Spitzer. The limb-darkening of the star was modeled by a quadratic law (Claret 2000). For both Warm Spitzer band- passes (3.6 and 4.5 µm), values for the two quadratic limb- darkening coefficients u1 and u2 were drawn at each step of the MCMC from normal distributions whose expecta- tions and standard deviations were drawn from the tables of Claret & Bloemen (2011) for the corresponding band- passes and for the stellar atmospheric parameters given in Tables A.1-4. Five chains of 100000 steps were performed for each analysis, their convergences being checked using the sta- tistical test of Gelman and Rubin (1992). They followed a preliminary chain of 100000 steps, which was performed to estimate the need to rescale the photometric errors. For each light curve, the standard deviation of the residuals was then compared to the mean photometric errors, and the re- sulting ratios βw were stored. βw represents the under- or 4 overestimation of the white noise of each measurement. On its side, the red noise present in the light curve (i.e. the inability of our model to represent perfectly the data) was taken into account as described in G10, i.e. a scaling fac- tor βr was determined from the standard deviations of the binned and unbinned residuals for different binning inter- vals ranging from 5 to 120 minutes, the largest values being kept as βr. At the end, the error bars were multiplied by the correction factor CF = βr × βw. The derived values for βr and βw are given for each light curves in Tables A.5-11. 5. Results For each planet searched for transit, Table 1 presents the derived posterior full transit probability P (f, D), i.e. the probability that the planet undergoes full transits given the Spitzer data. Bayes theorem shows that P (f, D) = P (f )P (D, f ) P (f )P (D, f ) + P (g)P (D, g) + P (n)P (D, n) (2) P (f ), P (g), and P (n) are the prior (geometric) probabil- ities of full, grazing and no transit, respectively (P (g) is close to zero, and P (n) ∼ 1 − P (t)). P (D, f ), P (D, g), and P (D, n) are the probabilities (likelihoods) to have the ob- served data given the three mutually exclusive hypotheses. All the terms of the right-hand side of Eq. 2 are probed by the MCMC analysis, resulting in accurate estimates of P (f, D). Figs. 1-4, 6-14, and 16-20 show the resulting detrended Spitzer light curves and the derived posterior PDFs for the inferior conjunction. Below, we provide relevant details for our 19 targets. 5.1. BD-061339 BD-061339 (a.k.a. GJ 221) is a V=9.7 late-K dwarf around which two planets were detected by HARPS (Lo Curto et al. 2013), a super-Earth on a ∼3.9d orbit and a planet of ∼ 50M⊕ minimal mass on a ∼126d orbit. Our model selection process for the RVs (HARPS + PFS) favored a model with a slope in addition to these two planets (Table A.1) . The derived value for this slope is −0.73 ± 0.15 m s−1 per year, which could correspond to a giant planet in outer orbit or to the imprint of a stellar magnetic cycle. As can be seen in Fig. 1, the high-precision of the Spitzer photometry (42 ppm per 30 min time bin) discards any transit for BD-061339 b during our observations, even for an unrealistic pure iron composition. However, the edge of the right wing of the PDF for T0 was not explored by our observations, so a late transit is still possible. The resulting posterior full transit probability is 0.53% (Table 1), high enough to justify a future exploration of the late part of the transit window. 5.2. HD 1461 HD 1461 is a V=6.5 solar-type star known to host a super- Earth on a 5.77 d orbit (Rivera et al. 2010). Recently, a second super-Earth on a 13.5 d orbit was announced by D´ıaz et al. (2015). In our analysis of the HARPS + Keck RVs for this star, the convergence of the MCMC appeared to be significantly improved by removing the 20 first Keck M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Fig. 1. Warm Spitzer photometry for BD-061339 after cor- rection for the instrumental effects, normalization, and bin- ning per 30 min. Models for a central transit of BD-061339 b are shown, assuming a pure iron (red solid line) and pure water ice (blue dashed line) composition. The highest pos- terior probability model, which assumes no transit, is also shown (purple line). The posterior PDF for the transit tim- ing derived from the RV analysis is shown above the figure. measurements for which the exposure time and the result- ing precision were significantly lower than for the rest of the data. Our analysis favored a three planet model (5.77, 13.5, and 377 days period) in addition to a second-order time polynomial, suggesting the presence of a fourth low- frequency signal, and an activity model consisting of a sum of second-order polynomials in the cross-correlation func- tion (CCF, Baranne et al. 1996, Queloz et al. 2001) parame- ters (Table A.1): width, contrast, and bisector. We inferred that the 377d period, close to the duration of a year, is caused by a systematic effect (the stitching) recently re- vealed to affect HARPS data (Dumusque et al. 2015). The data used by D´ıaz et al. (2015) were corrected for this ef- fect. We made several tests that showed that the inclusion or not of this 377d Doppler signal in the RV model did not affect the results for the closest-in planet, including its transit ephemeris, so we kept it in our final analysis. A search for a transit of HD 1461 b with Spitzer was pre- sented by Kammer et al. in 2014 (program 80220). We first reduced their data and used them with the HARPS+Keck RVs as input for a global MCMC analysis. The resulting posterior full transit probability was 0.5%, suggesting that a small but significant fraction of the transit window was not covered by these Spitzer observations. As can be seen in Fig. 2, a transit that had ended just before the Spitzer ob- servations remained possible. This possibility is amplified by the ramp effect that affected the first hour of the Spitzer data, resulting in an increase of brightness that could be degenerated with a transit egress. We thus complemented these Spitzer archive data with new Spitzer observations covering the first part of the transit window. We performed a global analysis of all Spitzer + RVs that made a transit- ing configuration for HD 1461 b very unlikely (see Fig. 2), the resulting posterior full transit probability now being of only 0.14% (Table 1). Fig. 2. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 1461 b. Upper panel cor- responds to archive data (program 80220, Kammer et al. 2014), and the lower panel corresponds to the new data gathered in our program 90072. The upper panel also shows the light curve derived without correction of the ramp effect (open pale green circles). 5.3. HD 10180 HD 10180 is a V=7.3 solar-type star hosting a particularly interesting system of six planets of relatively low-masses (Lovis et al. 2011). At first, we did not consider search- ing for the transit of the 1.18d-period Earth-mass planet candidate HD 10180 b presented by Lovis et al. (2011) be- cause its Doppler detection was not firmly secured when we planned our Spitzer Cycle 6 observations of the star. Furthermore, we estimated that its transit would, in any case, be too shallow (a few dozens of ppm, at most 100 ppm) to be firmly detected with Spitzer. We thus focused on the planet HD 10180 c (M sin i = 13M⊕, P = 5.76 d), for which the Doppler signal was clearly detected in the HARPS data, and for which the expected transit depth (> 150 ppm) was large enough to ensure a sure detection with Spitzer. enabled us to discard a transit of the planet (Fig. 3), the resulting posterior full transit probability be- ing of 0.14% (Table 1). Still, we noticed a shallow structure in the detrended photometry that occurs at a time con- sistent with a transit of HD 10180 b (Fig. 4), the best-fit transit depth of ∼90 ppm translating into a radius of 1.2 R⊕ consistent with a planetary mass of 1M⊕. Based on this result, we decided to observe in our Cycle 9 program 90072 two more transit windows of HD 10180 b, this time at 4.5 µm. No transit structure was clearly detected in the resulting light curves (Fig. 4, bottom), and a short MCMC analysis of the data led us to conclude that these new data do not increase the significance of the 2010 tentative detec- tion. We thus conclude that the low-amplitude structure in 5 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Fig. 3. Same as Fig. 1 for the light curve of 2010 Jan 16 for HD 10180 c. our Cycle 6 Spitzer light curve is probably just correlated noise of instrumental origin that is not perfectly represented by our baseline model and that can easily be modeled by a shallow enough transit profile. For Spitzer, the average amplitude of these correlated noise structures is of a few dozen of ppm (see Sec. 6), making the firm detection of a unique transit shallower than ∼100ppm impossible - simi- larly to the one expected for HD 10180 b (see discussion in Sec. 6 and our estimated detection thresholds in Table 1). This so-called red noise limit can be surpassed, but only by gathering more observations of the transit window, as we did here (see also the case of HD 40307 b in Gillon et al. 2010). 5.4. HD 13808 In 2012, we analyzed the HARPS dataset for the V =8.4 early K-dwarf HD 13808, confirming the existence of the two planets around it with periods of 14.2 d and 53.7 d announced by Mayor et al. (2011, hereafter M11). Furthermore, our analysis revealed the existence of (1) a low-frequency signal that was well-modeled with a quadratic trend, whose origins is the magnetic cycle of the star (Queloz et al. in prep.), and (2) a low-amplitude Doppler signal with a period of 1.091 d which corresponds to a planet of Mp sin i = 1.5± 0.3 M⊕ with an interestingly high transit probability of ∼20%. The false-alarm probabil- ity (FAP) derived by Systemic for this short-period planet candidate was close to 1%. Based on this small FAP and the scientific importance of this putative planet if transiting, we decided to monitor two of its transit windows with Spitzer. Unfortunately, the resulting light curves did not show any convincing transit-like structure (Fig. 5). Our Spitzer data were not acquired during a transit window of the planet at 14.2 d, thus keeping its transiting nature unconstrained. In 2014, we analyzed the updated HARPS dataset. This analysis confirmed the existence of the low-frequency signal of magnetic cycle origins, still well-modeled by a quadratic trend, but it led to a much lower significance (FAP ∼ 10%) for the 1.091 d signal. A stronger signal at 18.98 d and at its alias period of 1.056 d emerged with FAP close to 1%. Still, including a polynomial function of the CCF param- eters (bisector, contrast, width) in our MCMC modeling, 6 Fig. 4. T op: Same as Fig. 3, except that a possible tran- sit of HD 10180 b was included in the global model. Highest posterior probability transit model for HD 10180 b is shown in purple. The posterior PDF for the transit timing of HD 10180 b derived from an RV analysis assuming 7 planets is shown above the figure. Bottom: 2013 Warm Spitzer pho- tometry for HD 10180 binned per 30 min, corrected for the instrumental effects, normalized, and folded on the transit ephemeris for HD 10180 b based on our tentative detection of a transit and on the results of an RV analysis assuming 7 planets (dT = time from most likely mid-transit time). these signals vanished from the residuals, indicating that their origin is stellar (activity), not planetary. The period 18.98 d could then be interpreted as the rotation period of the star, resulting in an equatorial rotation speed ∼2.2 km.s−1 which is consistent with the measured v sin i of 2 km.s−1 (Glebocki & Gnacinski 2005). This stellar signal, combined with aliasing effects, would thus be responsible for creating spurious signals with periods slightly larger than 1 d. 5.5. HD 20003 HD 20003 is a late-G dwarf of magnitude V =8.4 for which M11 announced the detection by HARPS of two planets with periods of 11 d and 33 d. Our analysis of the up- dated HARPS dataset for HD 20003 not only confirmed these planets, but also revealed two longer period signals: one at ∼180 d that was determined as originating from the stitching effect, and another, at ∼10 yr, that originates from the magnetic cycle of the star (Udry et al. in prep.). Only HD 20003 b (P =11 d) has a significantly eccentric orbit. We used Spitzer to probe its transiting nature. We did not de- M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Fig. 5. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 13808 b. These data probed the 2-σ transit window of a planetary candidate that turned out to be a spurious signal with more RV data (see Sec. 5.4 for details). Fig. 7. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 20781 b. cially interesting target for a transit search, so we included it in the target list of our Spitzer program and observed one of its transit window during Cycle 9. Because of the extreme faintness of the Doppler signal (K ∼ 90 cm.s−1), the orbital eccentricity of the planet is poorly constrained from the RVs alone, resulting in a particularly large transit window. As such, we assumed the orbit to be circular to minimize the required Spitzer time, judging a circular or- bit as a reasonable assumption, taking into consideration the strong tidal forces exerted by the star at such close dis- tance and the compactness of the planetary system that would make any significantly eccentric orbit unstable. Our Spitzer photometry did not reveal any transit-like structure (Fig. 7), the resulting posterior full transit proba- bility being 0.15% (Table 1). Still, our precision is not high enough to securely detect the transit of this very low-mass planet if its amplitude is below ∼150ppm, corresponding to Mercury-like iron-rich compositions. Re-observing the planet's transit window at higher precision with, for exam- ple, CHEOPS will be mandatory to fully exclude a transit- ing configuration for the planet. Fig. 6. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 20003 b. 5.7. HD 31527 tect a transit (Fig. 6). But, as can be seen in Fig. 6, we did not probe the latest part of its transit window, resulting in a small but still significant posterior full transit probability of 0.54% (Table 1). 5.6. HD 20781 Based on 96 HARPS measurements, M11 announced the discovery of two Neptunes with orbital periods of 29.1 d and 85.1 d around this nearby V =8.4 K0-dwarf. The anal- ysis of our much extended HARPS dataset (212 points) confirmed the existence of these two planets, while re- vealing the existence of two super-Earths in shorter or- bits: a Mp sin i = 6.3M⊕ planet at 13.9 d period, and a Mp sin i = 2.1M⊕ planet at 5.3 d period (Udry et al. in prep.). The low minimal mass and relatively high transit probability (>7%) of this latter planet made it an espe- M11 announced the existence of three Neptune-mass plan- ets around this nearby V = 7.5 solar-type star, with orbital periods of 16.5 d, 51.3 d, and 275 d. Our analysis of the ex- tended HARPS dataset (242 vs 167 measurements) con- firmed the existence of these planets and improved their orbital parameters, while not revealing any other planet (Udry et al. in prep.). We used ∼36 hr of continuous Spitzer observation to search for a transit of the innermost planet, HD 31527 b (geometric transit probability = 4.4%). The re- sulting light curve did not reveal any transit (Fig. 8), the resulting posterior full transit probability being of 0.45% (Table 1). Compared to the orbital solution that we used to schedule our Spitzer observations, the updated solution presented here (Table 2) results in Spitzer observations that are not well centered on the peak of the posterior PDF for the transit timing. The right wing of this PDF is thus unex- plored. Its future exploration with, for example, CHEOPS would be desirable to fully exclude a transiting nature for the planet. 7 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Fig. 8. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 31527 b. Fig. 10. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 45184 b. Fig. 9. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 39194 b. Fig. 11. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 47186 b. 5.8. HD 39194 This star is a V = 8.1 early K-dwarf around which HARPS detected three super-Earths with orbital periods of 5.6 d, 14.0 d, and 33.9 d (M11, Queloz et al. in prep.). Our anal- ysis of the updated HARPS dataset (261 RVs vs 133 in the discovery paper) fully confirmed the existence of these planets, and revealed a low-amplitude trend. With a geo- metric transit probability of ∼6.5%, theinnermost of these planets was an interesting target for our program, and we monitored one of its transit windows with Spitzer in Dec 2012. As shown in Fig. 9, the resulting light curve was flat, our deduced posterior transit probability being of 0.46% (Table 1). 5.9. HD 45184 M11 reported the detection of a Neptune-mass planet on a 5.9 d period around this bright (V = 6.4) solar-type star. Based on more than double the HARPS measurements (174 vs 82), our analysis confirms the existence of this planet, while revealing the presence of a second planet of simi- lar mass, ∼9.5 M⊕, on a outer orbit (P =13.1 d), and a trend in the RVs that we could relate to the magnetic cycle of the star (Udry et al. in prep.). We monitored the star 8 for more than 11hrs with Spitzer to search for the transit of HD 45184 b. The resulting light curve is flat (Fig. 10), while its precision would have been high enough to detect the searched transit for any plausible composition. We did not explore the latest part of the transit window, leaving a posterior probability of 1.3% that the planet undergoes full transit (Table 1), for a prior geometric probability of 7.7%. 5.10. HD 47186 HD 47186 b is a short-period (P =4.08 d) Neptune-mass planet discovered by HARPS in 2009 (Bouchy et al. 2009) around a V = 7.6 solar-type star, which is also orbited by a giant planet at a much longer period. Our analysis of the extended HARPS dataset confirmed the existence of these two planets, and enabled us to derive an excellent precision on the time of inferior conjunction of the inner planet (1σ- error of 30 min for our Spitzer observations). We searched for its transit within our Spitzer cycle 6 program. The re- sulting flat light curve (Fig. 11) enables us to fully reject the transiting nature of the planet (Table 1). M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Fig. 12. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 51608 b. Fig. 13. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 93385 d. 5.11. HD 51608 We used Spitzer to search for the transit of the P = 14.07 d Neptune-mass planet HD 51608 b detected by M11 around this bright (V = 6.3) late G-type dwarf. Our analysis of the updated HARPS dataset (210 RVs) confirmed the existence of the two planets (P = 14.07d and 95d) announced in M11, and favored a low-amplitude trend of probable magnetic cycle origin (Udry et al. in prep.). Our Spitzer photometry (Fig. 12) enabled us to discard a transit of HD 51608 for any plausible planetary composition, our posterior full tran- sit probability being 0.11% (Table 1) for a prior geometric transit probability of ∼4%. 5.12. HD 93385 The detection of two low-mass planets was reported by M11 for this V = 7.5 solar-type star, with derived mini- mal masses of 8.4 and 10.1 M⊕ and orbital periods of 13.2 d and 46 d, respectively. Our analysis of the updated HARPS dataset (231 RVs) revealed the existence of a third lower- mass (M p sin i = 4.0 ± 0.5M⊕) planet on a 7.3 d orbit (Queloz et al. in prep., see Table A.3). With Spitzer, we monitored a transit window (∼29hr) of this new planet, HD 93385 d. Our resulting photometry (Fig. 13) did not reveal any clear transit-like structure, and the posterior full transit probability that we derived from its analysis is 0.23% (Table 1), for a prior geometric transit probabil- ity of 7.9%. By injecting transit models in this light curve and analyzing the results with our MCMC code, we con- cluded that its precision of ∼ 40 ppm per half-hour is good enough to discard any central transit of a planet with a density equal or smaller than Earth's, but cannot firmly discard the transit of denser planet. We thus recommend the re-observation of the transit window at higher photo- metrical precision with, for example, CHEOPS. 5.13. HD 96700 HD 96700 b is a ∼ 9M⊕ planet on a 8.1 d orbit discovered by M11 around a V = 6.5 solar-type star. Our analysis of the updated HARPS dataset (244 RVs) confirmed its existence and the outer Neptune-mass planet found by M11 on a ∼100 d period. It also revealed a low-amplitude trend in Fig. 14. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 96700 b. the RVs of probable magnetic cycle origin (Queloz et al. in prep.). We searched for the transit of HD 96700 b with Spitzer in 2013, without success (Fig. 14). The precision of the Spitzer light curve is high enough to discard a transit of HD 96700 b in it for any possible planetary composition. The resulting posterior transit probability of the planet is 0.09%, for a prior probability of 6.8% (Table 1). 5.14. HD 115617 HD 115617 (aka 61 Vir) is a V =4.7 solar-type star (G5V) at only 8.5 pc from Earth. A close-in super-Earth (Mp sin i = 5M⊕, P = 4.215 d) and two outer Neptunes (Mp sin i = 18 & 23M⊕, P = 38 & 123 d) were discovered around it by Vogt et al. (2010) using RVs obtained with Keck/HIRES and the Anglo-Australian Telescope (AAT). We performed a global analysis of the Keck, and AAT RVs that confirmed the existence of the three planets, without revealing any ad- ditional object orbiting the star. We used Spitzer to observe a transit window of HD 115617 in March 2010. With K = 2.96, HD 115617 is an extremely bright star for Spitzer. At 4.5 µm, it is nevertheless faint enough to be unsaturated for the shortest available integration time (0.01s). However, the Spitzer Science Center (SSC) in- formed us that the requested long observation of HD 15617 9 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Fig. 15. T op: 61 Vir light curve obtained by Spitzer to search for the transit of its planet b, divided for the best- fit phase-pixel model (here a third order x and y-position polynomial), unbinned (green dots) and binned to inter- vals of 0.005d (7.2 min). The start of the second AOR is represented by the red vertical line. Bottom: Lomb-Scargle periodogram showing a clear power excess at ∼0.11 days and its first harmonic. could not be performed at 4.5 µm for technical reasons. At 3.6 µm, the star has a flux density of 19000 ± 4000 mJy while the saturation limit is 20000 mJy for an integra- tion time of 0.01s. SSC informed us the observations could still be performed without any risk of saturation if the star was placed at the corner of four pixels, leading to an effec- tive flux density that was low enough to avoid saturation. We decided to test this strategy. Unfortunately, the light curve corrected for known systematic effects is corrupted by a clear variability at the level of a few tens of percent (Fig. 15, top). A Lomb-Scargle periodogram (Press et al. 1992) of the corrected photometry reveals a power excess at ∼0.11 days (Fig 15, bottom). We could not identify the origin of this variability. Nevertheless, an astrophysical ori- gin is very unlikely, since HD 115617 is known to be an old inactive star (Vogt et al. 2010). This variability probably originates from the near-saturation of the detector. Indeed, the center of the stellar image was not located at the corner of four pixels as intended. The instrumental effect at work has a typical timescale similar to the signal we are trying to detect, and its amplitude is much larger than the one of the searched transit. Even worse, it seems highly variable in nature and we could not find any analytical function of external parameters (PSF peak value, center position and width, background, etc.) able to represent it satisfactorily. Without a thorough understanding of the effect, we con- cluded that searching for a transit of a few hundreds of ppm with such data was illusory. The transiting nature of HD 115617 b thus remains unconstrained by our project. 10 Fig. 16. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 125612 c. 5.15. HD 125612 HD 1215612 is a V = 8.3 solar-type star around which three planets have been detected so far by RVs, first a P ∼ 510 d gas giant in 2007 (Fischer et al.) with Keck+HIRES data, then a close-in (P =4.15 d) Neptune-mass planet and a ∼3000 d-period gas giant with HARPS (Lo Curto et al. 2010). In April 2010, we used Spitzer to search for the tran- sit of the close-in planet HD 125612 c. Our initial light curve showed a structure consistent with a transit, so we trig- gered new observations of the transit window with Spitzer in September 2010 that did not confirm the transit signal. Reanalyzing the April data, we noticed that the transit sig- nal disappeared when we included terms in the PSF widths, revealing that the signal originated from the Spitzer PSF breathing effect (Lanotte et al. 2014). Our global analysis of the two Spitzer light curves allowed us to discard a transit- ing configuration for the planet for any possible planetary composition (Fig. 16), the resulting posterior probability for a full transit being of only 0.24%, for a prior probability of 9.7% (Table 1). We note that the standard deviations of our Spitzer light curves binned per 30 min intervals are the largest for HD 125612 (92 and 102 ppm, see Fig. 16). This is also the case for the RV jitter measured from the HARPS RVs (3.2 m s−1 ), suggesting that HD 125612 is significantly more active star than our other targets. M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search 5.16. HD 134060 HD 134060 is a G0-type dwarf with a V -magnitude of 6.3 at 24pc from Earth, for which M11 and Udry et al. (in prep.) reported the discovery by HARPS of a Neptune (minimal mass = 11 M⊕) on a 3.3d orbit, HD 134060 b, in addition to a giant planet on a much wider orbit. Interestingly, the HARPS RVs showed that HD 134060 b has a significant ec- centricity of 0.40 ± 0.04, despite its very short orbit, rem- iniscent of the still poorly understood eccentricity of the hot Neptune prototype GJ 436 b (Lanotte et al. 2014). Our analysis of the updated HARPS dataset confirmed this sig- nificant eccentricity. The orientation of the elliptic orbit of the planet made its occultation by its host star much more likely than its transit (23 vs 8%, see Table A.4), and its tim- ing much better constrained. We thus decided to use a few hours of Spitzer first to try to detect the occultation of the planet. We choose to perform the measurement at 3.6µm, based on the clear detection of the occultation of GJ 436 b at 3.6 µm and its non-detection at 4.5 µm (Stevenson et al. 2010, Lanotte et al. 2014). Assuming black-body spec- tra for the star and the planet, we estimated the expected occultation depth to range from a few tens to more than 200ppm, depending on the unknown planet's size, albedo, and heat-distribution efficiency. The resulting light curve (Fig. 17, bottom panel) did not reveal a single eclipse, but its precision was not high enough to discard an occultation of the planet for a large range of the plausible planetary pa- rameters cited above. We then attempted a transit search, this time at 4.5 µm. The resulting light curve was flat (Fig. 17, top panel) and enabled us to fully discard a full transit of the planet (Table 1). 5.17. HD 181433 Three planets were detected by HARPS around this V = 8.4 K-dwarf (Bouchy et al. 2008). Our analysis of the up- dated HARPS dataset confirmed the existence of these three planets, and resulted in a prior transit probabil- ity of 5% for the inner most of them, the super-Earth HD 181433 b (Mp sin i ∼ 7.5M⊕, P =9.375d). Our Spitzer observations of one of its transit windows led to a transit light curve that did not reveal any transit signature (Fig. 18), while being precise enough to discard a transit for any possible composition of the planet. Our global MCMC anal- ysis of the RVs and Spitzer photometry led to a posterior full transit probability of 0.52% (Table 1), which is proba- bly large enough to justify a future exploration of the first part of the transit window that was left unexplored by our Spitzer observations (see Fig. 18). 5.18. HD 215497 Two planets were detected by HARPS around this nearby (∼44 pc) K-dwarf (Lo Curto et al. 2010), one of them be- ing a giant planet on a significantly eccentric 568d-orbit, and the other being a close-in (P =3.93d) super-Earth (Mp sin i = 6M⊕). Our analysis of the updated HARPS dataset, containing only three additional RVs, confirmed the existence of both planets. Based on its interestingly high transit probability of ∼ 12% the inner super-Earth HD 215497 b, we targeted it in our Spitzer transit search. The resulting light curve did not reveal any transit signa- ture and was precise enough to discard a transit for most Fig. 17. T op: same as Fig. 1 for HD 134060 b. Bottom: same for the planet's occultation. The red solid line and blue dashed line show, respectively, models for a central occul- tation of a 1.85 R⊕ (Earth-like composition) and 5 R⊕ (H- dominated composition) planet, assuming a null albedo, an inefficient heat distribution to the night side, and negligible tidal effects for the planet, and assuming black-body emis- sions for both the planet and its star. The time range of the x-axes of both panels correspond to the same duration so as to outline the fact that the transit timing was much less constrained by the RVs than the occultation timing. Fig. 18. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 181433 b. 11 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Fig. 19. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 215497 b. plausible compositions. Yet, a high impact parameter tran- sit of an iron-dominated planet is not discarded by the data (see Fig. 19), resulting in a small but significant posterior full transit probability of ∼ 0.31% (Table 1). 5.19. HD 219828 Discovered by Melo et al. in 2007, HD 219828 b is a hot Neptune (Mp sin i = 20M⊕) with an interestingly high ge- ometric transit probability of ∼14%, thanks to its close-in orbit (a=0.05 au, P =3.83d), combined with the relatively large size of its evolved G0-type host star (R∗ = 1.6R⊙). On the other hand, this large stellar size translated in expected transit depths as small as 100 ppm (pure iron composition), so we monitored two transit windows to reach a photomet- ric precision that was high enough to firmly constrain the (non-)transiting nature of the planet. The resulting light curves, both obtained at 4.5 µm, are shown in Fig. 20. They do not reveal any transit signature. Our global analysis of the RVs + photometry led to a complete rejection of a full transit configuration (Table 1-. Our analysis of the much ex- tended HARPS dataset compared to the HD 219828 b dis- covery paper (91 vs 22 RVs) confirmed the existence of a second, more massive planet (Mp sin i ∼ 15MJup) planet on a very eccentric (e = 0.81) long-period (P =13.1 years) orbit, as recently announced by Santos et al. (2016). 6. Discussion and conclusion The constraint brought by the Spitzer photometry on the transiting nature of a given planet can be directly esti- mated in Table 1 by comparing the derived prior and pos- terior transit probabilities. For 16 out of the 19 RV planets targeted here, our Spitzer observations explored the tran- sit window with a coverage and precision high enough to make a transiting configuration very unlikely, the poste- rior transit probabilities for these 16 targets all being less than 0.55% (Table 1). For HD 45184 b, this posterior transit probability is still of 1.3%, because our Spitzer observations did not explore the second part of its transit window (see Sect. 5.9 and Fig. 10). The transiting nature of HD 13808 b and HD 115617 b is left unexplored by our observations. For the radius of each planet, our MCMC analysis as- sumed a uniform prior PDF ranging from a pure-iron com- 12 Fig. 20. Same as Fig. 1 for HD 219828 b. position radius to 11 R⊕. The fact that a transiting config- uration was disfavored by our MCMC analysis for all tar- geted planets does not preclude the possibility that one or several transits were in the data, but were just too shallow to be noticed by the Markov Chains. To estimate the ac- tual detection threshold of our observations, we performed the following procedure for each of our targets. We created 50 fake transit light curves based on the multiplication of the actual light curve by a transit model of the targeted RV planets, each transit assuming a circular orbit for the planet, a mid-transit time drawn from the prior transit tim- ing PDF, which was derived from the RV analysis, and an impact parameter drawn from a uniform PDF that ranged from 0 to 0.9. For each transit model, the depth was au- tomatically tuned to have a difference in BIC of +9.2 be- tween models neglecting and taking into account the tran- sit. This difference in BIC corresponds to a Bayes factor of e9.2/2 = 100, indicating a decisive selection of the transit model (Jeffreys 1961), i.e. a firm detection (at better than 3-3.5 sigma) of the transit. We then averaged the transit depths (and planet's radii) derived for the 50 light curves and adopted the resulting value as the detection threshold for the considered dataset. These detection thresholds are given in Table 1, expressed as transit depth (in ppm) and planetary radius. For each planet, they are compared to the planet's radius assuming pure-iron and Earth-like compo- sitions. The detection threshold radius is smaller than the ones assuming pure-iron and Earth-like compositions for, M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search respectively, 5 and 14 of the 17 planets for which the tran- siting nature was constrained by our observations. For 12 and 3 planets, we cannot thus fully reject the absence of a transit in our data, provided very metal-rich and Earth-like compositions, respectively. However, no transiting configu- ration is even midly favored for any planet by our MCMC analysis (from the comparison of the last columns of Table 1), so, considering the excellent photometric precision of our Spitzer data, the hypothesis of a missed transit is clearly unlikely. Using the posterior transit probabilities shown in a posterior probability that none of the probed 19 planets transits of 83%, vs 22% for the corresponding prior proba- Table 1, the formula 1 −Qi=1:19 Pi(tr, D) indeed results in bility (1 −Qi=1:19 Pi(tr)). Our multi-Cycle Spitzer transit search explored the transiting nature of 25 RV planets. It detected one or several transits for the planets HD 75732 e (aka 55 Cnc e) (Demory et al. 2011, Gillon et al. 2012) and HD 219234 b (Motalebi et al 2015), confirmed the transiting nature of HD 97658 b (Van Grootel et al. 2015), discarded or disfa- vored the transiting nature of 20 planets (including one presented in S´egransan et al., in prep.), and left the one of two planets unconstrained. By discovering the transits of two planets of a few Earth-masses that are suitable for detailed atmospheric characterization, it brought a signifi- cant contribution to the study of super-Earths. Statistically speaking, its final result is normal: considering all the plan- ets listed in Table 1 except HD 97658 b, which we decided to observe only because we knew that it was probably transit- ing (Dragomir et al. 2013), the sum of the geometric transit probabilities amounts to 196%, i.e. the project was expected to observe the transits of ∼ 2 planets. The photometric performances demonstrated by Spitzer in this program are illustrated in Fig. 21. This figure com- pares as a function of the targets' K-magnitude the stan- dard deviations measured in the detrended light curves for a sampling of 30 min to the corresponding formal errors com- puted following the instructions of the Spitzer Observation Manual (SOM6). At 4.5µm, the measured standard devia- tions are well modeled by the linear relationship σ30min = 32.5 + 11.97 × (Kmag − 5) ppm, while the mean quadratic difference between the measured standard deviations and the formal errors is 35 ± 5 ppm. This quadratic difference is 64 ± 9 ppm at 3.6 µm, and 45 ± 4 ppm when neglect- ing HD125612, which seems to be a more active star than our other targets (Sec. 5.15). These quadratic differences can be attributed to the low-frequency noise of instrumen- tal and astrophysical origins that cannot be represented by our instrumental model. Figure 21 shows that this red noise dominates the photometric precision of Spitzer, especially for the brighter targets. Its values are low enough -- a few dozens of ppm -- to qualify the photometric precision of Spitzer as excellent, and to make it an optimal facility for the search for very low-amplitude transits on bright nearby stars. The Spitzer mission should come to an end in early 2019. Fortunately, the CHEOPS space mission (Broeg et al. 2015) will arrive just in time to take over the search for the transits of super-Earths discovered by RVs around nearby stars. CHEOPS will not benefit from a targets' visibility as favorable as Spitzer, but its full dedication to transit 6 http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/warmmission/propkit/som/ Fig. 21. Standard deviations of the detrended Spitzer pho- tometry binned per 30 min (open circles) and the cor- responding formal errors (triangles) as a function of the K-magnitude of the targets. Blue = 3.6 µm, red = 4.5 µm. The dashed red line shows the best-fit linear rela- tionship between the standard deviations measured at 4.5 µm and the K-magnitudes, its equation being σ30min = 32.5 + 11.97 × (Kmag − 5) ppm. observations will more than compensate for its geocentric orbit. Acknowledgements. This work is based in part on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA. Support for this work was provided by NASA. M. Gillon is Research Associate at the Belgian Scientific Research Fund (F.R.S-FNRS). This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. References Arriagada, P., Anglada-Escud´e, G., Butler, R. P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 771, 42 Baranne, A., Queloz, D., Mayor, M. et al. 1996, A&AS, 119, 373 Bonfils, X., Gillon, M., Forveille, T., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A111 Bouchy F., Mayor M., Lovis C., et al., 2009, A&A, 496, 527 Broeg, C., Fortier, A., Ehrenreich, D., et al. 2013, Hot Planets and Cool Stars, Garching, Germany, Edited by Roberto Saglia; EPJ Web of Conferences, Volume 47 Butler, R. P., Vogt, S. S., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2004, ApJ, 617, 580 Casagrande, L., Schoenrich, R., Asplund, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, 138 Charbonneau, D., Berta, Z. K., Irwin, J., et al. 2009, Nature, 462, 891 Claret, A. 2000, A&A, 363, 1081 Claret, A., & Bloemen, S. 2011, A&A, 529, A75 Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., Deming, D., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A114 Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., Seager, S., et al. 2012, ApJL, 751, 28 D´ıaz, R. F., S´egransan, D., Udry, S., et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A134 Dragomir, D., Matthews, J. M., Eastman, J. D., et al. 2013, ApJL, 772, 2 13 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Planet Ms d [M⊙] [pc] K Mp sin i Detection threshold ppm/[R⊕] [M⊕] Pure-Fe Earth-like radius [R⊕] radius [R⊕] HD 40307 b1 GJ 3634 b2 HD 75732 e3,4 HD 97658 b5 HD 219134 b6 BD-061339 b7 HD1461 b7 HD 10180 c7 HD 13808 b7 HD 20003 b7 HD 20781 b7 HD 31527 b7 HD 39194 b7 HD 45184 b7 HD 47186 b7 HD 51608 b7 HD 93385 d7 HD 96700 b7 HD 115617 b7 HD 125612 c7 HD 134060 b7 HD 181433 b7 HD 215497 b7 HD 219828 b7 0.78 0.45 0.91 0.77 0.78 0.63 1.04 1.06 0.77 0.91 0.83 0.96 0.72 1.00 1.03 0.86 1.04 0.96 0.94 1.09 1.07 0.86 0.87 1.18 12.8 19.8 12.3 21.1 6.5 20.3 23.2 39.0 28.6 43.8 35.4 38.6 25.9 21.9 39.6 34.8 42.2 25.7 8.6 54.2 24.2 26.8 43.6 72.3 4.79 7.47 4.02 5.73 5.57 6.31 4.90 5.87 6.78 6.65 6.55 6.05 6.09 4.87 6.01 6.33 6.07 5.00 2.96 6.84 4.84 6.09 6.78 6.53 4.3 7.0 7.8 7.6 4.3 6.9 6.7 13.1 11.8 11.8 2.1 10.7 4.1 12.1 23.2 13.1 4.0 9.1 6.2 19.3 10.0 7.5 6.1 20.2 150/0.91 500/1.05 NAa NAa NAa 235/1.15 170/1.56 180/1.73 NAa 280/1.79 220/1.39 190/1.64 210/1.22 150/1.39 175/1.59 195/1.39 200/1.78 155/1.58 NAa 290/1.92 165/1.61 190/1.26 250/1.66 155/2.18 1.13 1.31 1.34 1.33 1.15 1.30 1.29 1.53 1.50 1.49 0.93 1.46 1.12 1.50 1.77 1.54 1.11 1.40 1.26 1.69 1.43 1.33 1.26 1.71 1.44 1.65 1.70 1.69 1.44 1.64 1.63 1.95 1.90 1.90 1.17 1.85 1.42 1.91 2.26 1.95 1.41 1.77 1.60 2.16 1.82 1.68 1.59 2.19 Prior P (tr) Posterior P (tr, D) [%] 6.6 7.0 28.9 4.3 9.5 7.7 8.1 8.4 3.5 3.4 7.1 4.4 6.4 7.7 10.5 4.0 7.9 6.8 9.4 9.7 8.4 4.9 11.8 14.2 [%] 0.19 0.50 100 100 100 0.53 0.14 0.14 3.5 0.54 0.15 0.46 0.46 1.29 0.00 0.11 0.23 0.09 9.4 0.24 0.00 0.52 0.31 0.00 Table 1: 24 of the 25 planets targeted by our Spitzer multi-cycle transit search. The first group of 5 planets are the targets for which results were presented previously. The second group of 19 planets are the targets of this work. For each planet, column 6 provides the mean transit detection threshold (in ppm and [R⊕]), as inferred from injection of transit models in the data (see Sec. 6 for details). Column 7 and 8 give the theoretical radii corresponding, respectively, to a pure-iron and Earth-like compositions. Columns 9 and 10 present the a priori (geometric) and a posteriori (after observation) transit probabilities for the planet. aNot Applicable: for HD 13808 b and HD 115617 b (61 Vir b), our observations did not constrain the (non-)transiting configuration, while for HD 75732 e (55 Cnc e), HD 97658 b, and HD 219134 b, a transit was firmly detected in the data. References: 1: Gillon et al. 2010, 2: Bonfils et al. 2011, 3: Demory et al. 2011, 4: Gillon et al. 2012a, 5: Van Grootel et al. 2014, 6: Motalebi et al. 2015, 7: this work. Dumusque, X., Pepe, F., Lovis, C., & Latham, D. W., 2015, ApJ, 808, 171 Hog, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al. 2000, A&A, 355, 27 Houk, N. & Cowley, A. P. 1975, Michigan Spectral Survey, Ann Arbor, Ehrenreich, D., Bourrier, V., Wheatley, P. J., et al. 2015, Nature, 522, Dep. Astron., Univ. Michigan, 1 459 Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2012, ApJS, 201, Fazio, G. G., Hora, J. L., Allen, L. E., et al., 2004, ApJS, 154, 10 Fischer, D., Marcy, G., Butler, P., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1336 Flower, P. J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 355 Gelman, A., Rubin, D. 1992, Statist. Sci., 7, 457 Gillon M., Pont F., Demory B.-O., et al, 2007, A&A, 472, L13 Gillon, M., Deming, D., Demory, B.-O., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, A25 Gillon, M., Demory, B.-O., Benneke, B., et al. 2012a, A&A, 539, A28 Gillon, M., Triaud, A. H. M. J., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2012b, A&A, 15 Ingalls, J. G., Krick J. E., Carey, S. J., et al. 2012, Proc. SPIE 8442 Jeffreys, H. 1961, The Theory of Probability, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press. Kammer, J. A., Knutson H. A., Howard, A. W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 103 Kharchenko, N. V. 2001, Kinematika i Fizika Nebesnykh Tel, 17, 409 Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Allen, L. A. et al., 2008, ApJ, 673, 542, A4 526 Gillon, M., Demory, B.-O., Madhusudhan, N., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, Knutson, H. A., Benneke, B., Deming, D. & Homeier, D. 2014a, A21 Nature, 505, 66 Glebocki, R. & Gnacinski, P. 2005, Catalogue of Stellar Rotational Knutson, H. A., Dragomir, D., Kreidberg, L., et al. 2014b, ApJ, 794, Velocities, ESA, SP-560, 571 155 Gray, R. O., Corbally, C. J., Garrison, R. F., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2048 Gray, R. O., Corbally, C. J., Garrison, R. F., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 161 Kreidberg, L., Bean, J., Desert, J.-M., et al., 2014, Nature, 505, 69 Lanotte, A. A., Gillon, M., Demory, B.-O., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, 73 Lo Curto G., Mayor, M., Benz, W., et al. 2010, A&A, 512, A48 14 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Lo Curto, G., Mayor, M., Benz, W., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, 59 Lanotte, A., Gillon, M., Demory, B.-O., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, 73 Lovis, C., S´egransan, D., Mayor, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A112 Mandel, J., & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, 171 Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., et al. 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20 Mayor, M., Marnier, M., Lovis, C., et al. 2011, A&A (submitted), arXiv1109.2497 Melo, C., Santos, N. C., Gieren, W., et al. 2007, A&A, 467, 721 Meschiari, S., Wolf, A. S., Rivera, E. et al., 2009, PASP, 121, 1016 Motalebi, F., Udry, S., Gillon, M., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A72 Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., et al. 1984, ApJ, 279, 763 Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., Flannery, B. P. 1992, Numerical Recipes in Fortan 77: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge Universty Press Queloz, D., Henry, G. W., Sivan, J. P., et al. 2001, A&A, 379, 279 Rafikov R. R., 2006, ApJ, 648, 666 Rivera, E. J, Butler, R. P., Vogt, S. S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1492 Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 45 Santos, N. C., Bouchy, F., Mayor, M., et al. 2004, A&A, 426, L19 Santos, N. C., Sousa, S. G., Mortier, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A150 Santos, N. C., Santerne, A., Faria, J. P., et al. 2016, A&A, 592, A13 Schwarz, G. E. 1978, Annals of Statistics, 6, 461 Seager, S., Kuchner, M., Hier-Majumder, C. A., Militzer, B. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1279 Seager, S. 2010, Exoplanet Atmospheres, Princeton University Press Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163 Stevens, D. J. & Gaudi, B. S. 2013, PASP, 125, 933 Stevenson, K. B., Harrington, J., Nymeyer, S., et al. 2010, Nature, 464, 1161 Stevenson, K. B., Harrington, J., Fortney, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 136 Stetson, P. B. 1987, PASP, 99, 111 Valencia D., Guillot, T., Parmentier, V., Freedman, R. S. 2013, ApJ, 775, 10 Van Grootel, V., Gillon, M., Valencia, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 2 Van Leeuwen, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 653 Vogt, S. S., Wittenmeyer, R. A., Butler, R. P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1366 Wisniewski, J. P., Ge, J., Crepp, J. R., et al. 2012, AJ, 143, 107 Winn, J. N., Matthews, J. M., Dawson, R. I., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, L18 Wright, J. T. 2005, PASP, 117, 657 Appendix A: Tables The following tables describe the targets of this work (Tables A.1 to A.4) and the Spitzer observations (Tables A.5 to A.11). 15 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search BD-061339 20.3 ± 0.7(1) 9.67 ± 0.04(2) 6.31 ± 0.02(3) K7V/M0V(4) 4040 ± 50(5) −0.07 ± 0.10(5) 0.63 ± 0.03(5) −1.07 ± 0.03(6) 0.69 ± 0.02 4.56 ± 0.04 HD 1461 HD 10180 HD 13808 HD 20003 23.2 ± 0.3(1) 6.46 ± 0.01(2) 4.90 ± 0.02(3) G3V(7) 5765 ± 50(8) 0.19 ± 0.01(8) 1.04 ± 0.07(8) 39.0 ± 0.6(1) 7.32 ± 0.01(12) 5.87 ± 0.02(3) G1V(13) 5910 ± 50(14) 0.08 ± 0.01(14) 1.06 ± 0.05(14) 28.6 ± 0.5(1) 8.38 ± 0.01(2) 6.25 ± 0.02(3) K2V(13) 5035 ± 50(8) −0.21 ± 0.02(8) 0.77 ± 0.06(8) 43.8 ± 1.2(1) 8.37 ± 0.01(2) 6.65 ± 0.02(3) G8V(16) 5495 ± 50(8) 0.04 ± 0.02(8) 0.91 ± 0.07(8) −0.082 ± 0.009(6) −0.058 ± 0.009(6) −0.290 ± 0.021(6) −0.140 ± 0.013(6) 1.10 ± 0.02 4.37 ± 0.04 1.18 ± 0.02 4.32 ± 0.03 0.81 ± 0.02 4.51 ± 0.05 0.98 ± 0.02 4.41 ± 0.04 HARPS: 102(4)+10 HARPS: 167(9)+82(10)+5 HARPS: 190(14)+63 HARPS: 133(9)+89 HARPS: 104(9)+77 Star d [parsec] V [mag] K [mag] Spectral type Tef f [K]a [Fe/H] [dex] M∗ [M⊙] Bolometric Correction R∗ [R⊙]b log g [cgs] RV Data Model PFS: 15(5) 2 Keplerians Keck: 144(11) 3 Keplerians + linear trend + quadratic trend Jitter noise [m s−1 ] HARPS: 2.7 PFS: 2.7 +CCF function HARPS: 1.5 Keck: 2.4 & 1.6e 6 Keplerians 2 Keplerians 4 Keplerians + quadratic trend +CCF function 1.5 1.7 1.4 Planet BD-061339 b(4) HD 1461 b(11) HD 10180 c(14) HD 13808 b(9,15) HD 20003 b(9,17) Mp sin i [M⊕] Min. Rp [R⊕]c Min. (Rp/R∗)2 [ppm]c Teq [K]d T0-2450000 [BJDT DB ] 6.93 ± 0.96 1.30 ± 0.05 298 ± 29 796 ± 17 6627.48+0.18 −0.16 6.73 ± 0.47 1.29 ± 0.03 115 ± 6 1154 ± 20 6549.30 ± 0.12 13.11 ± 0.62 1.53 ± 0.02 142 ± 6 1223 ± 18 5212.837+0.059 −0.074 11.83 ± 0.88 1.50 ± 0.03 286 ± 18 674 ± 14 11.79 ± 0.61 1.49 ± 0.02 191 ± 9 836 ± 12 6537.49 ± 0.26 6538.34 ± 0.36 P [d] Wb=0 [min] K [m s−1 ] a [AU] e ω [deg] Prior Ptransit [%] Prior Poccultation [%] 3.87310 ± 0.00037 5.77198 ± 0.00030 5.75931 ± 0.00021 14.1853 ± 0.0019 11.8489 ± 0.0015 139 ± 15 3.90 ± 0.52 218 ± 11 2.34 ± 0.13 238 ± 10 4.51 ± 0.15 246 ± 13 3.73 ± 0.20 388 ± 23 3.84 ± 0.20 0.04136 ± 0.00066 0.0638 ± 0.0015 0.0641 ± 0.0010 0.1050 ± 0.0028 0.09817 ± 0.00072 0.11+0.11 −0.08 192+69 −93 7.72+0.77 −0.71 7.9+1.1 −0.7 0.037+0.041 −0.026 134+110 −120 8.06 ± 0.38 8.00 ± 0.38 0.045+0.037 −0.030 320+51 −41 8.38+0.30 −0.33 8.78+0.38 −0.32 0.042+0.043 −0.029 272+85 −75 3.52 ± 0.18 3.68+0.21 −0.18 0.377 ± 0.047 267.1+7.6 −8.3 3.43 ± 0.15 7.50+0.62 −0.56 Table A.1: Targets 1-5 of our Warm Spitzer program. For each target, the table presents the assumed stellar parameters, the RV data and details of their analysis, and the parameters that we derived for the planet searched for transit from our RV analysis. aFor the sake of realism, a minimal error of 50K was assumed here. bFrom luminosity and Tef f . cAssuming Mp sin i = Mp. These minimum values correspond to a pure iron planet (Seager et al. 2007). dAssuming a null albedo and a heat distribution factor f ′ = 1/4 (Seager 2010). eFor the first and second Keck datasets presented in Rivera et al. (2010), respectively. References: (1)Van Leeuwen (2007), (2)Kharchenko (2001), (3)Skrutskie et al. (2006), (4)Lo Curto et al. (2013), (5)Arriagada et al. (2013), (6)Flower (1996), (7)Gray et al. (2003), (8)Santos et al. (2013), (9)Mayor et al. (2011), (10)D´ıaz et al. (2015), (11)Rivera et al. (2010), (12)Hog et al. (2000), (13)Gray et al. (2006), (14)Lovis et al. (2011), (15)Queloz et al. in prep., (16)Houk & Cowley (1975), (17)Udry et al. in prep. 16 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Star d [parsec] V [mag] K [mag] Spectral type Tef f [K]a [Fe/H] [dex] M∗ [M⊙] HD 20781 HD 31527 HD 39194 HD 45184 35.4 ± 1.3(1) 8.44 ± 0.01(2) 6.55 ± 0.02(3) K0V(4) 5255 ± 50(5) −0.11 ± 0.02(5) 0.83 ± 0.06(5) 38.6 ± 0.9(1) 7.48 ± 0.01(2) 6.05 ± 0.02(3) G0V(9) 5900 ± 50(5) -0.17 ± 0.01(5) 0.96 ± 0.07(5) 21.9 ± 0.2(1) 8.08 ± 0.01(2) 6.09 ± 0.02(3) K0V(4) 5205 ± 50(5) −0.61 ± 0.02(5) 0.72 ± 0.05(2) 6.37 ± 0.01(4) 4.87 ± 0.02(3) G2V(4) 5870 ± 50(5) 0.04 ± 0.01(5) 1.00 ± 0.07(5) Bolometric Correction −0.208 ± 0.016(6) −0.059 ± 0.009(6) −0.225 ± 0.017(6) −0.058 ± 0.008(6) R∗ [R⊙]b log g [cgs] RV Data Model 0.86 ± 0.02 4.49 ± 0.04 1.09 ± 0.02 4.35 ± 0.04 0.77 ± 0.02 4.52 ± 0.04 1.04 ± 0.02 4.40 ± 0.04 HARPS: 96(7)+117 HARPS: 167(7)+75 HARPS: 133(7)+128 HARPS: 82(7)+92 4 Keplerians 3 Keplerians 3 Keplerians 2 Keplerians + quadratic trend + quartic trend + CCF function + CCF function Jitter noise [m s−1 ] 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.95 Planet HD 20781 b(8) HD 31527 b(7,8) HD 39194 b(7,9) HD 45184 b(7,8) Mp sin i [M⊕] Min. Rp [R⊕]c Min. (Rp/R∗)2 [ppm]c Teq [K]d 2.12 ± 0.35 0.93 ± 0.04 99 ± 11 993 ± 20 10.68 ± 0.71 1.46 ± 0.03 150 ± 8 839 ± 15 4.08 ± 0.32 1.12 ± 0.03 179 ± 13 935 ± 19 12.08 ± 0.86 1.50 ± 0.03 175 ± 10 1143 ± 20 T0-2450000 [BJDT DB ] 6613.92 ± 0.23 6792.65 ± 0.36 6285.93 ± 0.15 6317.67 ± 0.13 P [d] Wb=0 [min] K [m s−1 ] a [AU] e ω [deg] 5.3144 ± 0.0011 16.5547 ± 0.0033 5.63675 ± 0.00044 5.88607 ± 0.00032 180 ± 6 0.88 ± 0.14 293 ± 19 2.78 ± 0.13 174 ± 10 1.83 ± 0.12 209 ± 13 4.33 ± 0.23 0.0560 ± 0.0014 0.1253 ± 0.0031 0.0555 ± 0.0013 0.0638 ± 0.0015 0 (fixed) 0.117 ± 0.052 - Prior Ptransit [%] 7.14 ± 0.25 Prior Poccultation [%] 7.14 ± 0.25 42+23 −26 4.40 ± 0.29 3.81 ± 0.22 0.033+0.035 −0.023 224+97 −90 6.38 ± 0.36 6.57+0.42 −0.33 0.122+0.053 −0.057 178+30 −27 7.72+0.51 −0.44 7.67+0.48 −0.43 Table A.2: Same as Table A.1 for targets 6-9. References: (1)Van Leeuwen (2007), (2)Hog et al. (2000), (3)Skrutskie et al. (2006), (4)Kharchenko (2001), (5)Santos et al. (2013), (6)Flower (1996), (7)Mayor et al. (2011), (8)Udry et al. in prep., (9)Queloz et al. in prep. 17 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Star d [parsec] V [mag] K [mag] Spectral type Tef f [K]a [Fe/H] [dex] M∗ [M⊙] HD 47186 HD 51608 HD 93385 HD 96700 HD 115617 39.6 ± 1.0(1) 7.63 ± 0.01(2) 6.01 ± 0.03(3) G5V(4) 5675 ± 50(5) 0.23 ± 0.02(5) 1.03 ± 0.07(5) 34.8 ± 0.7(1) 8.17 ± 0.01(2) 6.33 ± 0.02(3) G7V(4) 5360 ± 50(5) -0.07 ± 0.01(5) 0.86 ± 0.06(5) 42.2 ± 1.3(1) 7.49 ± 0.01(2) 6.07 ± 0.02(3) G2/G3V(4) 5975 ± 50(5) 0.02 ± 0.01(5) 1.04 ± 0.07(5) 25.7 ± 0.4(1) 6.50 ± 0.01(2) 5.00 ± 0.02(3) G1/G2V(4) 5845 ± 50(5) −0.18 ± 0.01(5) 0.96 ± 0.07(5) 8.56 ± 0.02(1) 4.73 ± 0.01(4) 2.96 ± 0.24(3) G5V(4) 5575 ± 50(5) 0.01 ± 0.05(5) 0.94 ± 0.08(5) Bolometric Correction −0.100 ± 0.010(6) −0.176 ± 0.016(6) −0.049 ± 0.007(6) −0.069 ± 0.008(6) −0.120 ± 0.012(6) 1.10 ± 0.02 4.37 ± 0.04 0.91 ± 0.02 4.45 ± 0.04 1.15 ± 0.02 4.33 ± 0.04 1.16 ± 0.02 4.29 ± 0.04 0.98 ± 0.02 4.43 ± 0.05 HARPS: 66(7)+67 HARPS: 118(8)+92 HARPS: 127(8)+106 HARPS: 146(8)+98 Model 2 Keplerians 2 Keplerians 3 Keplerians 2 Keplerians + quadratic trend + CCF function + quadratic trend + CCF function Jitter noise [m s−1 ] 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.6 AAT: 126(10) + Keck: 80(10) 3 Keplerians Keck: 2.3 AAT: 2.2 R∗ [R⊙]a log g [cgs] RV Data Wb=0 [min] K [m s−1 ] a [AU] e ω [deg] Planet HD 47186 b(7) HD 51608 b(8,9) HD 93385 d(10) HD 96700 b(7,10) HD 115617 b(11) Mp sin i [M⊕] Min. Rp [R⊕]c Min. (Rp/R∗)2 [ppm]c Teq [K]d 23.2 ± 1.1 1.77 ± 0.02 217 ± 9 1277 ± 22 T0-2450000 [BJDT DB ] 5179.972 ± 0.021 13.12 ± 0.77 1.54 ± 0.02 239 ± 13 749 ± 14 6379.95+0.18 −0.16 3.97 ± 0.48 1.11 ± 0.03 79 ± 7 1129 ± 19 9.05 ± 0.64 1.40 ± 0.02 121 ± 6 1087 ± 19 5.86 ± 0.66 1.24 ± 0.04 135 ± 9 1190 ± 24 6364.17 ± 0.27 6521.26 ± 0.16 5280.71 ± 0.17 P [d] 4.084575 ± 0.000043 14.0702 ± 0.0015 7.3422 ± 0.0014 8.12541 ± 0.00068 4.21504 ± 0.00061 190 ± 6 9.1 ± 1.3 255 ± 11 3.85 ± 0.14 227+20 −24 4.51 ± 0.15 273+16 −13 174 ± 9 2.97 ± 0.15 2.44 ± 0.24 0.0505 ± 0.0012 0.1084 ± 0.0025 0.0749 ± 0.0017 0.0780 ± 0.0019 0.0500 ± 0.0014 0.039 ± 0.014 57 ± 23 Prior Ptransit [%] 10.45 ± 0.34 Prior Poccultation [%] 9.84 ± 0.31 0.033+0.033 −0.023 130+74 −66 3.97+0.19 −0.16 3.84 ± 0.17 0.13+0.10 −0.09 87 ± 60 7.9+1.1 −0.7 6.68+0.54 −0.61 0.049+0.049 −0.034 293 ± 74 6.76+0.33 −0.36 7.12+0.45 −0.34 0.078+0.083 −0.055 58+73 −160 9.45+0.99 −0.63 8.89+0.63 −0.72 Table A.3: Same as Table A.1 for targets 10-14. References: (1)Van Leeuwen (2007), (2)Hog et al. (2000), (3)Skrutskie et al. (2006), (4)Kharchenko (2001),(5)Santos et al. (2013), (6)Flower (1996), (7)Bouchy et al. (2009), (8)Mayor et al. (2011), (9)Udry et al. in prep., (10)Queloz et al. in prep., (11)Vogt et al. (2010) 18 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Star HD 125612 HD 134060 HD 181433 HD 215497 HD 219828 d [parsec] V [mag] K [mag] Spectral type Tef f [K]a [Fe/H] [dex] M∗ [M⊙] 54.2 ± 3.0(1) 8.32 ± 0.02(2) 6.84 ± 0.03(3) G3V(4) 5915 ± 50(5) 0.24 ± 0.01(5) 1.09 ± 0.07(5) 24.2 ± 0.3(1) 6.29 ± 0.01(2) 4.84 ± 0.03(3) G3IV(4) 5965 ± 50(5) 0.14 ± 0.01(5) 1.07 ± 0.07(5) 26.8 ± 0.8(1) 8.38 ± 0.01(4) 6.09 ± 0.02(3) K5V(4) 4880 ± 50(5) 0.36 ± 0.18(5) 0.86 ± 0.17(5) 43.6 ± 2.0(1) 8.95 ± 0.02(2) 6.78 ± 0.02(3) K3V(4) 5000 ± 100(5) 0.25 ± 0.05(5) 0.87 ± 0.11(5) 72.3 ± 3.9(1) 8.01 ± 0.01(2) 6.53 ± 0.02(3) G0IV(4) 5890 ± 50(5) 0.19 ± 0.03(5) 1.18 ± 0.08(5) Bolometric Correction −0.057 ± 0.008(6) −0.050 ± 0.007(6) −0.360 ± 0.024(6) −0.304 ± 0.048(6) −0.061 ± 0.008(6) R∗ [R⊙]a log g [cgs] RV Data Model Jitter noise [m s−1 ] 1.03 ± 0.02 4.43 ± 0.03 1.15 ± 0.02 4.35 ± 0.04 0.84 ± 0.02 4.51 ± 0.11 0.97 ± 0.04 4.40 ± 0.08 1.60 ± 0.03 4.10 ± 0.04 HARPS: 58(7)+10 HARPS: 100(9)+50 HARPS: 107(11)+78 HARPS: 105(7) + 3 HARPS: 22(21)+69 Keck: 19(8) 3 Keplerians HARPS: 3.2 Keck: 4.7 2 Keplerians 3 Keplerians 2 Keplerians 2 Keplerians + CCF & logR'(HK) + CCF function function 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.5 Planet HD 125612 c(7) HD 134060 b(9,10) HD 181433 b(11) HD 215497 b(7) HD 219828 b(12) Mp sin i [M⊕] Min. Rp [R⊕]c Min. (Rp/R∗)2 [ppm]c Teq [K]d 19.3 ± 2.1 1.69 ± 0.04 226 ± 14 1269 ± 21 T0-2450000 [BJDT DB ] 5296.79 ± 0.14 P [d] 4.15514 ± 0.00044 9.97 ± 0.60 1.43 ± 0.03 130 ± 8 1469 ± 24 6416.96+0.10 −0.09 3.269555+0.000092 −0.000080 309 ± 16 4.69 ± 0.19 Wb=0 [min] K [m s−1 ] a [AU] e ω [deg] Prior Ptransit [%] Prior Poccultation [%] 172+12 −16 7.33 ± 0.73 0.0520 ± 0.0011 0.0441 ± 0.0010 0.093+0.090 −0.064 120+66 −71 9.7+1.1 −0.7 8.86+0.59 −0.69 0.480 ± 0.034 258.5 ± 5.2 8.39 ± 0.32 23.2+1.7 −1.5 7.5 ± 1.1 1.33 ± 0.06 210 ± 18 753+29 −23 6.11 ± 0.78 1.26 ± 0.04 141 ± 15 1101 ± 39 20.2 ± 1.2 1.71 ± 0.02 96 ± 5 1596 ± 27 6265.33 ± 0.17 5393.96 ± 0.14 5410.658 ± 0.050 9.37518 ± 0.00056 3.93394 ± 0.00065 3.834863 ± 0.000094 227 ± 19 2.72 ± 0.13 0.0822+0.0050 −0.0058 0.380 ± 0.041 198.2 ± 7.1 4.93+0.49 −0.39 6.25+0.64 −0.51 152 ± 19 2.81 ± 0.27 271 ± 13 7.43 ± 0.27 0.0465 ± 0.0020 0.0507 ± 0.0012 0.215 ± 0.096 0.063 ± 0.036 122 ± 30 11.8+1.8 −1.4 8.57+0.97 −0.87 228 ± 39 14.18 ± 0.64 15.32+0.76 −0.67 Table A.4: Same as Table A.1 for targets 15-19. References: (1)Van Leeuwen (2007), (2)Hog et al. (2000), (3)Skrutskie et al. (2006), (4)Kharchenko (2001),(5)Santos et al. (2013), (6)Flower (1996), (7)Lo Curto et al. (2010), (8)Fischer et al. (2007), (9)Mayor et al. (2011), (10)Udry et al. in prep., (11)Bouchy et al. (2009), (12)Melo et al. (2007). 19 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Star Program ID BD -061339 90072 Observation date 2013-11-30 HD 1461 (1): 80220(1) (2): 90072 (1): 2011-08-31 (2): 2013-09-13 Channel [µm] 4.5 4.5 AOR(s)a (S1): 48815616 (1): 48815360 (2): 48815104 (1): 42790656 (S2): 48816128 (2): 48815872 Spitzer pipeline version S19.1.0 Exposure time [s] NBCD b Duration [hr] 0.4 (1):1038 (2): 970 (1): 7.9 (2): 7.4 S19.1.0 0.1 (1): 5548 (2): 3600 (1): 12.9 (2): 8.4 Photometric aperture [pixels] (1) & (2): 3.5 (1) & (2): 3.5 HD 10180 (1): 60027 (2) & (3): 90072 (1): 2010-01-16 (2) : 2013-08-10 (3): 2013-09-09 (1): 3.6 (2) & (3): 4.5 (1): 38139392 (S2): 48596224 (2): 48595968 (S3): 48595712 (3): 48595456 (1): S18.18.0 (2) & (3): S19.1.0 0.1 (1): 4400 (2) & (3): 3175 (1): 10.4 (2) & (3): 7.4 (1): 3 (2): 2.5 Baseline modelc (1): p(wx + [xy]2) +BM (1): p(w2 x + wy3 + [xy]3 + l2) +BM (1): p(t + wx + w2 (3): 3 y + [xy]2 + l) + BM (2): p(wx + wy + [xy]2) + BM (2): p(wx + [xy]2) + BM (2): p(wx + [xy]2 + l2) + BM Error correction factorsd (1): βw = 0.94, βr=1.21 (1): βw = 0.97, βr=1.91 (2): βw = 0.91, βr=1.24 (2): βw = 0.94, βr=1.34 (3): p(wx + wy + [xy]2 + l) + BM (1): βw = 0.95, βr=1.62 (2): βw = 0.97, βr=1.26 (3): βw = 0.99, βr=1.42 Table A.5: Details of our Warm Spitzer data and their analysis for targets 1-3. aAOR = astronomical observation fequest = Spitzer observing sequence. (S) designates a short pre-run AOR performed to stabilize the pointing and instrument. bBCD = Basic Calibrated Data = block of 64 Spitzer/IRAC subarray exposures. cFor the baseline model, p(ǫN ) denotes, respectively, an N -order polynomial function of the logarithm of time (ǫ = l), of the PSF x- and y-positions (ǫ = [xy]), and widths (ǫ = wx & wy). BM=BLISS mapping. dsee Sec. 4. References: (1)Kammer et al. (2014). 20 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Star Program ID Observation date Channel [µm] AOR(s)a Spitzer pipeline version Exposure time [s] NBCD b HD 13808 90072 (1) 2013-08-15 (2) 2013-08-27 4.5 (S1): 48814848 (1): 48814592 (S2): 48818176 (2): 48817920 S19.1.0 0.4 (1) & (2): 970 Duration [hr] (1) & (2): 7.4 HD 20003 90072 2013-09-01 4.5 (S): 48408576 (1): 48408320 (2): 48408064 (3): 48407808 S19.1.0 0.4 (1) & (2): 1498 (3): 580 (1) & (2): 11.5 (3): 4.4 HD 20781 90072 2013-11-16 4.5 (S): 48817664 (1): 48817408 (2): 488817152 (3): 48816896 (1): S19.1.0 0.4 (1) & (2): 1367 (3): 580 (1) & (2): 10.4 (3): 4.4 Photometric aperture [pixels] Baseline modelc (1): 2.75 (2): 3.5 (1) & (2) & (3): 3.5 (1) & (2) & (3): 2.75 (1): p(wx + wy + [xy]2) +BM (1): p(w2 (2): p(w2 x + w2 y + [xy]) + BM (2): p(wx + wy + [xy]) + BM (2): p(w2 x + w2 y + [xy]2) +BM (1): p(wx + wy + [xy]2) + BM x + wy + [xy]2) + BM Error correction factorsd (1): βw = 0.93, βr=1.00 (1): βw = 0.93, βr=1.30 (1): βw = 0.97, βr =1.06 (3): p(wx + wy + [xy]) + BM (3): p(wx + [xy]2) + BM (2): βw = 0.96, βr=1.55 (2): βw = 0.95, βr=1.12 (2): βw = 0.91, βr =1.14 (3): βw = 0.98, βr=2.03 (3): βw = 0.97 βr=1.31 Table A.6: Same as Table A.5 for targets 4-6. Star Program ID Observation date Channel [µm] AOR(s)a Spitzer pipeline version Exposure time [s] NBCD b Duration [hr] Photometric aperture [pixels] Baseline modelc HD 31527 90072 2014-05-13 4.5 (S): 50091776 (1): 50091520 (2): 50091264 (3): 50091008 S19.1.0 0.4 (1) & (2) & (3): 1558 (1) & (2) & (3): 11.9 (1) & (2) & (3) : 3.25 x + [xy]2) +BM (1): p(w2 (2): p(wx + wy + [xy]2) + BM y + [xy]2) + BM (3): p(wx + w3 HD 39194 90072 2012-12-24 4.5 (S): 46914816 (1): 46914560 (1): S19.1.0 0.1 (1): 4890 (1): 11.4 (1): 3.0 (1): p(wx + wy + [xy]2 + l) + BM Error correction factorsd (1): βw = 0.93, βr=1.19 (1): βw = 0.97, βr=1.15 (2): βw = 0.95, βr=1.20 (3): βw = 0.93, βr=1.38 Table A.7: Same as Table A.5 for targets 7-8. 21 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Star Program ID Observation date Channel [µm] AOR(s)a Spitzer pipeline version Exposure time [s] NBCD b Duration [hr] HD 45184 90072 2013-01-24 4.5 (S): 46917376 (1): 46917120 S19.1.0 0.1 (1): 4880 (1): 11.4 Photometric aperture [pixels] (1): 3.25 HD 47186 60027 2009-12-14 3.6 38065664 S19.1.0 0.1 2115 5 2.75 HD 51608 90072 2013-03-27 4.5 (S): 48411392 (1): 48411136 (2): 48410880 (1): S19.1.0 0.4 (1): 1498 (2): 1300 (1): 11.4 (2): 9.9 (1) & (2): 2.25 Baseline modelc (1): p(w2 x + wy + [xy]2 + l) +BM p(w2 x + [xy]2 + l) +BM (1): p(wx + wy + [xy]2) + BM (2): p(wx + wy + [xy]2) + BM Error correction factorsd (1): βw = 0.94, βr=1.54 (1): βw = 1.00, βr=1.61 (1): βw = 0.95, βr=1.14 (2): βw = 0.94, βr=1.12 Table A.8: Same as Table A.5 for targets 9-11. Star Program ID Observation date Channel [µm] AOR(s)a Spitzer pipeline version Exposure time [s] NBCD b Duration [hr] HD 93385 90072 2013-03-12 4.5 (S): 48407552 (1): 48407296 (2): 48407040 (3): 48406784 S19.1.0 0.1 (1) & (2): 4245 (3): 2325 (1) & (2): 11.9 (3): 5.4 HD 96700 90072 2013-08-16 4.5 (S): 46916864 (1): 46916608 (2): 46916352 S19.1.0 0.1 (1): 4880 (2): 1240 (1): 11.4 (2): 2.9 HD 115617 60027 2010-03-25 3.6 (1): 39138816 (2): 39139072 S19.1.0 0.01 (1): 6600 (2): 6640 (1): 6.2 (2): 6.3 Photometric aperture [pixels] (1) & (2) & (3) : 2.5 (1) & (2): 2.75 (1) & (2): 2.25 Baseline modelc (1): p(wx + w2 y + [xy] + l) +BM (1): p(wx + wy + [xy]2) +BM (2): p(wx + wy + [xy]) +BM (2): p(wx + [xy]2) +BM (3): p(wx + [xy]2) +BM Error correction factorsd (1): βw = 0.96, βr=1.00 (1): βw = 0.99, βr=1.36 (2): βw = 1.00, βr=1.10 (1): βw = 0.97, βr=1.65 (3): βw = 1.00, βr=1.85 (1): - (2): - (1): - (2): - Table A.9: Same as Table A.5 for targets 12-14. The HD 115617 photometry is affected by a strong systematic error that prevented any searching for the transit of HD 115617 b. 22 M. Gillon et al.: Results of the Warm Spitzer transit search Star Program ID Observation date Channel [µm] AOR(s)a HD 125612 60027 (1): 2010-04-09 (2): 2010-09-10 3.6 (1): 38110464 (2): 40313600 Spitzer pipeline version S18.18.0 Exposure time [s] NBCD b Duration [hr] Photometric aperture [pixels] Baseline modelc Error correction factorsd 0.4 (1): 1790 (2): 1310 (1): 13.8 (2): 10.2 (1): 1.75 (1): p(w2 x + w2 (2): 1.9 y + [xy]3 + l) +BM HD 134060 (1): 60027 (2): 90072 (1): 2010-04-13 (2): 2013-05-04 (1): 3.6 (2): 4.5 (1): 38110720 (S2): 46916096 (2): 46915840 (1): S18.18.0 (2): S19.1.0 (1): 0.02 (2): 0.1 (1): 6200 (2): 4480 (1): 6 (2): 11.5 (1): 1.75 (2): 2.25 HD 181433 90072 2012-12-03 4.5 (S): 46915584 (1): 46915328 (2): 46915072 S19.1.0 0.4 (1): 1563 (2): 1498 (1): 11.9 (2): 11.4 (1): 3.25 (2): 3.25 (2): p(t + wx + w2 y + [xy] + l2) +BM (2): p(w2 (1): p(wx + [xy]2 + l) +BM (1): p(wx + wy + [xy]2) + BM x + wy + [xy]4) +BM (2): p(wx + wy + [xy]2) + BM (1): βw = 0.81, βr =2.02 (2): βw = 0.72, βr =2.34 (1): βw = 1.00, βr=1.62 (1): βw = 0.95, βr =1.27 (1): βw = 0.95, βr=1.30 (2): βw = 0.93, βr =1.11 Table A.10: Same as Table A.5 for targets 15-17. Star Program ID Observation date Channel [µm] AOR(s)a Spitzer pipeline version Exposure time [s] NBCD b HD 215497 90072 2010-07-16 4.5 38701568 S18.18.0 0.4 1750 Duration [hr] 13.4 Photometric aperture [pixels] 3 HD 219828 60027 & 90072 (1): 2010-08-01 (2): 2013-03-06 4.5 (1): 38702336 (2S): 46914304 (2A): 46914048 (2B): 46913792 S19.1.0 0.4 (1): 1440 (2A): 1564 (2B): 448 (1): 11 (2A): 11.9 (2B): 3.4 (1): 2.5 (2A): 3 (2B): 3 Baseline modelc p(wx + wy + [xy] + l) +BM (1): p(wx + wy + [xy]2 + l2) +BM (2A): p(wx + [xy]2 + l) +BM (2B): p(wx + [xy]2 + l2) +BM Error correction factorsd βw = 0.95, βr=1.20 (1): βw = 0.93, βr=1.53 (2A): βw = 0.96, βr =1.01 (2B): βw = 0.94, βr=1.14 Table A.11: Same as Table A.5 for targets 18-19. 23
1301.7205	1	1301	2013-01-30T12:05:21	The potential of sparse photometric data in asteroid shape modeling	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We investigate the potential of the sparse data produced by the Catalina Sky Survey astrometric project (CSS for short) in asteroid shape and rotational state determination by the lightcurve inversion method. We show that although the photometric quality of the CSS data, compared to the dense data, is significantly worse, it is in principle possible that these data are for some asteroids with high lightcurve amplitudes sufficient for a unique shape determination. CSS data are available for $\sim$180 asteroids for which shape models were previously derived from different photometric data sets. For 13 asteroids from this sample, we derive their unique shape models based only on CSS data, compare the two independent shape models together and discuss the reliability of models derived from only CSS data. We also use CSS data to determine shape models for asteroids with already known rotational period values, derive 12 unique models and compare previously published periods with periods determined from the full 3D modeling by the lightcurve inversion method. Finally, we test different shape resolutions used in the lightcurve inversion method in order to find reliable asteroid models.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The potential of sparse photometric data in asteroid shape modeling Astronomical Institute, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, V Holesovick´ach 2, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic. J. Hanus∗, J. Durech 3 1 0 2 n a J 0 3 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 5 0 2 7 . 1 0 3 1 : v i X r a Abstract We investigate the potential of the sparse data produced by the Catalina Sky Survey astrometric project (CSS for short) in asteroid shape and rotational state determination by the lightcurve inversion method. We show that although the photometric quality of the CSS data, compared to the dense data, is significantly worse, it is in principle possible that these data are for some asteroids with high lightcurve amplitudes sufficient for a unique shape determination. CSS data are available for ∼ 180 asteroids for which shape models were previously derived from different photometric data sets. For 13 asteroids from this sample, we derive their unique shape models based only on CSS data, compare the two independent shape models together and discuss the reliability of models derived from only CSS data. We also use CSS data to determine shape models for asteroids with already known rotational period values, derive 12 unique models and compare previously published periods with periods determined from the full 3D modeling by the lightcurve inversion method. Finally, we test different shape resolutions used in the lightcurve inversion method in order to find reliable asteroid models. Keywords: Asteroids, Sparse photometry, Shape models, Lightcurves 1. Introduction Orbital parameters are currently known for more than 400 000 asteroids. On the other hand, rotational states and shapes were determined only for a small fraction In the Minor Planet Lightcurve Database1 of them. (Warner et al., 2009), periods for ∼ 3 500 asteroids are stored. Convex shapes with spin axis directions were derived only for ∼ 200 asteroids, these three- dimensional models of asteroids are available in the Database of Asteroid Models from Inversion Tech- Durech et al., 2010) maintained by niques2 (DAMIT, the Astronomical Institute of the Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. All asteroid models in DAMIT were derived by the lightcurve inversion method (LI). This gradient-based method is a powerful tool that allows us to derive ba- sic physical properties of asteroids (the rotational state and the shape) from their disk-integrated photometry ∗Corresponding author. Tel: +420 221912572. Fax: +420 221912577. Email address: [email protected] () 1http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/lists/Lightcurve- Dat.html 2http://astro.troja.mff.cuni.cz/projects/aste- roids3D (see Kaasalainen and Torppa, 2001; Kaasalainen et al., 2001, 2002). LI, in a form we use, leads to a convex shape approximation of a real asteroid (close to its con- vex hull) that has to be a single body (or the possible moon has to be so small that its photometric signature is indistinguishable from the noise) in a relaxed rotational state (i.e., rotates around the axis with a maximum mo- mentum of inertia). Sidereal rotational period and the direction of the spin axis are determined simultaneously with the shape. Typical number of free parameters is ∼50 -- 80. We use two different types of disk-integrated photom- etry: (i) dense-in-time, which typically consists of tens to a few hundreds of individual data points observed during one revolution (typically several hours), and (ii) sparse-in-time, where the typical separation of individ- ual measurements is large compared to the rotation pe- riod. For sparse data, we usually have a few measure- ments per night, such as in the case of astrometric sky surveys. Based on the type of the photometry, we use the terms "dense lightcurves" and "sparse lightcurves". Unique asteroid shape models are typically feasible if we have dense lightcurves from at least three apparition, combined dense and sparse data give us more variabil- ity. Preprint submitted to Planetary and Space Science September 2, 2018 Our long-term strategy is to enlarge the number of asteroids with known shapes and rotational states, be- cause it can help us in understanding the physical pro- cesses that take place in the asteroid's populations, such as Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs), Main Belt As- teroids (MBAs) or even asteroids in individual fami- lies (e.g., Koronis family, Slivan, 2002; Slivan et al., 2003). Current distribution of periods and spin axes is the direct result of the evolution of these objects start- ing with their formation until the present time (several hundreds of Myr to ∼ 4 Gyr for most studied aster- oids). The most prominent processes acting on aster- oids are collisions and mass shedding, and the YORP ef- fect3 (Rubincam, 2000; Vokrouhlick´y et al., 2003). The knowledge of the shape can be used for several pur- poses, e.g.: (i) in the construction of a thermal model (e.g., Muller et al., 2011), where values for geometric albedo, size and surface properties can be determined, (ii) a sample of real shapes instead of synthetic ones can be used for the statistical study of the non-gravitational forces (Yarkovsky4 and YORP effects), or (iii) in combi- nation with star occultations by asteroids. These events (observed for hundreds of asteroids) give us additional information about the shape (e.g. non-convexities) and can lead to a size estimation with a typical uncertainty of 10% (see Durech et al., 2011). Most of the currently available photometric data were already used in the LI. The only significant excep- tion are data from the Catalina Sky Survey astrometric project (CSS for short, Larson et al., 2003). In this pa- per, we investigate the possibility of determination of re- liable asteroid shape models from only a small amount of sparse-in-time distributed low-quality photometric measurements (∼ 100) by the LI. Such data from CSS project are available for several thousands of asteroids. We want to find out if these data are for asteroids with high lightcurve amplitudes of a sufficient amount and quality for a unique shape determination, and if so, how reliable these asteroid models are. The investigation of sparse data capabilities and the reliability of derived models is important, because (i) it can lead to a deter- mination of new asteroid models without a need of ob- serving any additional photometric lightcurves, and (ii) in a few years, another huge amount of sparse data from three astrometric surveys will be available -- from the Pan-STARRS (Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid 3Yarkovsky -- O'Keefe -- Radzievskii -- Paddack torque caused by the recoil force from anisotropic thermal emission which can alter rotational periods and orientation of spin axes 4a thermal force acting on a rotating asteroid which can alter semi- effect, a major axes 2 Response System, Hodapp et al., 2004), and later also from the Gaia satellite (Perryman et al., 2001), and the LSST (Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, Ivezi´c et al., 2008). Understanding the CSS data with respect to the asteroid shape modeling will speed up future processing and use of the new sparse data. 2. Photometry For a unique5 shape determination of an asteroid, we typically need dense photometric data from at least three apparitions and a good coverage of the solar phase angle6 (i.e., different viewing geometries), ∼ 20 such dense lightcurves are usually sufficient. The biggest limiting factor of these data is their insufficient amount. Dense lightcurves were observed for ∼ 3 500 asteroids. Only in ∼ 100 cases, asteroid shape models were de- rived. Determination of new models based on the dense data is now possible only if new lightcurves are ob- served. Many amateurs or semi-professionals use their telescopes for asteroid observations, but their main goal is the determination of the synodic period, which can be derived already from one apparition. If a period for a particular asteroid is then secure, they usually do not observe this object any more. We have to observe such object by ourselves. This approach is demanding on ob- servational time and also on fundings. Models based only on dense data are important in testing the relia- bility of models based on sparse data (due to possible comparison). Currently available sparse photometry is accessible via the Asteroids -- Dynamic Site database7 (AstDyS), where data from hundreds of astrometric observatories are stored. The photometry is mostly a by-product of astrometric measurements and in most cases, asteroid magnitudes are given to only one decimal place, so the accuracy is 0.1 mag at best. Whether or nor this is suffi- cient for a unique shape determination for a reasonable number of asteroids was studied in Hanus et al. (2011). The authors have found 7 observatories with quality data and used these data in combination with relative lightcurves for asteroid shape modeling. The most ac- curate sparse photometry is from the U.S. Naval Obser- vatory in Flagstaff (USNO-Flagstaff station, MPC code 5We define a unique solution as follows: (i) the best period has at least 10% lower χ2 than all other periods in the scanned interval, (ii) for this period, there is only one pole solution with at least 10% lower χ2 than the others (with a possible ambiguity for λ ± 180◦), and (iii) this solution fulfills all our additional tests (discussed in Hanus et al., 2011). 6the Sun -- asteroid -- Earth angle 7http://hamilton.dm.unipi.it/astdys/ 689). These data were already studied in Durech et al. (2009) and based on these data, the authors derived con- vex shape models for 24 asteroids. The biggest dis- advantage of the USNO-Flagstaff station data is that they are available only for about 1000 brightest aster- oids. Data from Hipparcos satellite (ESA, 1997) and Roque de los Muchachos Observatory, La Palma (MPC code 950) are also accurate (compared to the other observatories), but their amount of measurements is even smaller than for the USNO-Flagstaff station. The largest amount of sparse photometry is available from the Catalina Sky Survey observatory (CSS for short, Larson et al., 2003). These data were already used in the LI by Hanus et al. (2011), but only in combina- tion with other photometric data. Their typical photo- metric accuracy was ∼ 12%. Although this accuracy of the CSS photometry seems very low, the data are valuable for asteroids with lightcurve amplitudes higher than & 0.3 mag, which is about a half of all aster- oids (based on the lightcurve data of the Minor Planet Lightcurve Database, Warner et al., 2009). There are dense lightcurves for only ∼ 700 asteroids with num- bers over ten thousand, on the other hand, we have at least 100 sparse data points from CSS for ∼ 6 000 of these asteroids. 3. Reliability of asteroid models derived only from the Catalina Sky Survey photometric data The Catalina Sky Survey astrometric project has pro- duced the largest amount of sparse photometric mea- surements. For most asteroids, no other data of suffi- cient quality are available. Test 1. One way how to test the reliability of mod- els based only on CSS data is to compare them with models derived from different photometric data set. So far, about a hundred of asteroid models were de- rived from dense data (e.g., Kaasalainen et al., 2002; Torppa et al., 2003; Slivan et al., 2003; Marciniak et al., Durech et al., 2007), another ∼ 100 models 2007; were derived from combined dense and sparse data ( Durech et al., 2009; Hanus et al., 2011). These models are believed to be reliable and thus correct. For most of these asteroids, CSS data are also available, so we tried to derive their models from only CSS data itself. We had at least 50 individual data points for 185 aster- oids. In 13 cases, we were able to derive their unique solutions. Only in 7 cases the solution was in an agree- ment with the model based on a different data set, other six solutions were formally correct, but derived periods were different from the expected ones. 3 Test 2. The main inconvenient when computing mod- els from sparse data is that synodic periods are known only for ∼ 3 500 asteroids (determined from dense lightcurves and stored in the Minor Planet Lightcurve Database). This a priori information is used in the shape modeling: we search for the model only near the as- sumed period (e.g., we test the initial period values from an interval (0.95 P, 1.05 P), where P is the published period value). Typically, we test a huge number of ini- tial period values (usually thousands), because the mod- eled parameter space is full of local minims and the gradient-based LI method converges to the nearest local minimum corresponding to the initial period value. The minimal difference between two local minims is given mainly by the timespan of the observational data (see Eq. 1) and is usually very small (. 10−3 h). Having a short period interval saves a lot of computational time and gives us confidence that the model is correct if the derived period value is close to P. Unfortunately, for most asteroids, we do not know the period (cannot be directly determined from sparse data without the model computation as in the case of the dense data), so we have to search for the model on a period interval of all possi- ble period values, typically 2 -- 100 hours. This consumes a lot of computational time and we loose the possibility of comparing the two period values. In this test we used the a priori information about the periods: for some asteroids, we knew their periods, we had only CSS data (there exists their dense lightcurves, but we do not have them in an electronic form), and, based on that data, we were also able to derive their models near the published period. We extended the model search on the period interval of 2 -- 100 hours and tried to find the model solutions again (as would be done if the period was unknown). This was performed for 12 asteroids. In 7 cases, the previous solution derived on a shorter period interval was reproduced also on a larger period interval. For 4 asteroids, we did not get a unique period solution on the extended period inter- val, and a formally correct (i.e., it fulfilled our condi- tions for a unique solution), but a different solution was found for one asteroid. On Fig. 1, we show a peri- odogram of asteroid (5647) 1990 TZ, where for each initial period value a χ2-value corresponding to the best shape model and pole direction (a local minimum in the multi-dimensional parameter space) is plotted. This model computation was based on 87 individual mea- surements from CSS, derived period P = 6.13867 h is in agreement with a period P = 6.141 h reported by Bembrick and Bolt (2003). 2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 (5547) 1990 TZ Best solution, P = 6.13867 h 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Period P [h] Figure 1: Periodogram of asteroid (5647) 1990 TZ. Each point corresponds to a particular local minimum in the modeled parameter space of periods, pole directions and shapes. Test 3. Since we derived several unique models that were clearly incorrect, we performed this test to check more carefully the stability of the solution and to de- tect false solutions. The shape of an asteroid is repre- sented by coefficients of its expansion into the spherical harmonic functions. These coefficients are optimized in the LI. The number of coefficients is given by the order n of the shape expansion we use, we call n the shape resolution. In the LI, we typically use n = 6, which corresponds to 49 coefficients ((n + 1)2). For asteroids with . 100 sparse data points from CSS, so many co- efficients could be to much and the LI could then lead to a random unstable solution that is even unique and physically correct. Another input parameter of the LI is the period step Pstep between two subsequent periods from the scanned interval. The minimal difference be- tween two local minims in the modeled parameter space of periods is given by ∆P = P2 T , (1) where P is the period value and T the timespan of the observational data. In our computations, we use for the period step a value Pstep = 0.8∆P. We tested the stability of the solution on different val- ues of the resolution n and on two values of the pe- riod step Pstep (0.8∆P and 0.5∆P). Table 1 summa- rizes the results of this test for all asteroids in Test 1 for which we derived their unique solutions for n = 6 and Pstep = 0.8∆P (corresponds to column 6). Correct unique solution is marked by "X", wrong unique solu- tion by "x" and no unique solution by " -- ". 4. Discussion In Test 1, where we compared the derived models with corresponding models based on different data sets (stored in DAMIT), in 7 cases out of 13, the solution was in a well agreement with a model based on a differ- ent and higher data set. From this point of view, CSS data, which represents the largest dataset of sparse pho- tometry with photometric accuracy theoretically suf- ficient for a unique shape determination, seem to be promising for the asteroid shape modeling. Unfortu- nately, several clearly wrong models that fulfilled our conditions on a unique solution were derived (they had different sidereal rotational periods than was expected). Similar problem occurred in Test 2, where we compared the derived models with their previously known periods. One model was clearly incorrect. There are several possible explanations why we de- rived incorrect models from the CSS data: (i) data for asteroids with low amplitudes are more noisy, (ii) low amount of data with respect to the number of modeled parameters, (iii) systematic errors of the survey. In cases (i) and (ii), the data are poor, contain not enough infor- mation about the period and shape, and could produce a random solution with an unrealistic rms value (the fit is "too perfect"). Oszkiewicz et al. (2011) show that photometric data sets from astrometric stations (such as CSS) exhibit magnitude variations with apparent V- band magnitude. For the brightest asteroids, the images are saturated, and for the faintest, the background sub- traction is imperfect. This consequence of (iii) is prob- ably partially visible in our data -- most of the incorrect 4 c Table 1: Test of the stability of the model solution on the shape resolution n and the step in the period Pstep. First column gives the asteroid number, symbol "X" means that for a given n and Pstep, both unique and correct solution was derived, symbol "x" means that a unique but wrong solution was derived, and finally, in the case if no unique solution was determined we use the symbol " -- ". Pstep = 0.8∆P Pstep = 0.5∆P n=2 Ast 685 X 1022 X 1419 X 1568 X 2156 X -- 3678 4483 X -- 52 68 -- 216 -- -- 455 -- 984 -- 1382 n=3 X X X X X -- X -- -- -- -- -- -- n=4 -- -- X X X X X x -- -- x -- -- n=5 X -- X X X X X -- -- x x -- -- n=6 X X X X X X X x x x x x x n=2 X X X X X -- X -- -- -- -- -- -- n=3 X X X X X -- X -- -- -- -- -- -- n=4 n=5 -- -- X X X X X x -- -- x -- -- -- -- X X X -- X -- -- -- x x -- n=6 X X X X X X X -- x -- x -- -- models are brighter (have higher absolute magnitudes) than the correct ones. We are not able to distinguish be- tween the effects of the amplitude and the noise from each other only from the sparse data itself without a model computation, so there is no way how to detect the case (i). The amount of data sufficient for a cor- rect unique shape determination is dependent mainly on the time epochs (geometry of observations) and also on the signal-to-noise ratio, which we do not know. So, the sufficient amount of sparse measurements strongly varies from one asteroid to the other. As seen from Table 1, models derived correctly for resolution n = 6 and period step Pstep = 0.8∆P are mostly determined for other resolutions n and both pe- riod steps Pstep. No wrong solution appeared. In several cases, a unique solution was not found, but the correct period was still detected (we had multiple pole solu- tions). On the other hand, for incorrect models from Test 1, we got unique solutions for different resolutions n and period steps Pstep only rarely and never for n = 2 or n = 3. All these unique solutions were always also incorrect. There is a weak dependence on the period step, Pstep = 0.5∆P seems to be more convenient be- cause when used, less incorrect models were derived. To minimize the determination of incorrect models that satisfy our requirement on unique solutions, we should use the values n = 6 and Pstep = 0.5∆P for resolution and period step, respectively. If a unique solution is then determined, the computation should be rerun with n = 3 and Pstep = 0.5∆P. The model is then reliable if we get similar unique solutions. We rerun the computation for all 8 successfully de- rived models from Test 2 with n = 3 and Pstep = 0.5∆P. Previously correct solutions were confirmed, the incor- rect one was ruled out. Our method assumes a single body in a relaxed ro- tation state (rotates around the principal axis with the maximum momentum of inertia). Objects like tumblers or binary asteroids are not identified by the used form of the LI, their model determination usually fails be- cause the single period model does not cover the more complex period features. The only exception are fully synchronous close binary systems with similar-sized components, such as 91 Antiope (Merline et al., 2000). These objects are reproduced as highly elongated single bodies, and because they have typically high lightcurve amplitudes, they could be easily present in the possible sample of models based on CSS data. 5. Conclusions Sparse data from the Catalina Sky Survey are low ef- ficient in unique model determination and seem more accurate for less brighter asteroids. Incorrectly deter- mined models could be indicated by unrealistic rms val- ues, but not generally. Correct period solutions for a single asteroid but dif- ferent resolution n were always stable, the dispersion in the period was typically lower than ∆P (given by Eq. 1), 5 which is for a period value of 10 hours and the timespan of the observations 10 years ∼ 10−3 h (typical values for the period and the timespan of the CSS data). The dispersion in the ecliptic latitude of the pole direction was usually . 20◦, but in the ecliptic longitude of the pole direction often & 50◦. This significant dispersion in longitude was partially caused by models with high values of ecliptic latitudes (longitudes are more dense near the pole than near the equator) and because of the small resolution of the shapes. We showed that CSS data can be successfully used for reliable asteroid model determination. The most ac- curately derived parameter is the rotational period. Al- though the Gaia satellite will produce during its oper- ational time in average only ∼ 60 data points for each asteroid (for CSS, we have ∼ 100), the photometric ac- curacy will be incomparably better than for CSS data. Less data will be compensated by better accuracy al- lowing determination of many new asteroid models (or at least accurate values for rotational periods). The com- bination of Gaia data with data from Pan-STARRS and LSST projects will significantly increase the amount of new models. For asteroids with low amplitudes, their signal-to-noise ratio of the Gaia data will be also low and we will encounter the same problem of incorrect solutions as for CSS data. The detection of these false models will be similar. Finding an infallible test for detecting the false so- lutions derived from Catalina data could allow us de- termination of shapes and physical parameters for tens of asteroids. While the LI is more successful for as- teroids with higher lightcurve amplitudes, the derived sample of asteroid parameters will be significantly bi- ased. For example, shapes will be more elongated than it is usual in the whole population. Careful de-biasing of the model sample will be necessary before its use in any statistical study and physical interpretation. Possible models based on Catalina data are good can- didates for follow-up observations, new dense photom- etry should help in the detection of incorrect solutions and should lead to more detailed shape models. Acknowledgements The work of JH and JD has been supported by grant GA UK 134710 of the Grant agency of the Charles Uni- versity, by the project SVV 265301 of the Charles Uni- versity in Prague, by grants GACR 205/08/H005 and GACR 209/10/0537 of the Czech grant agency and by the Research Program MSM0021620860 of the Czech Ministry of Education. The calculations were per- formed on the computational cluster Tiger at the As- tronomical Institute of the Charles University in Prague (http://sirrah.troja.mff.cuni.cz/tiger). References Bembrick, C., Bolt, G., 2003. Lightcurves across Australia: period determination for minor planet (5647) 1990 TZ. Minor Planet Bul- letin 30, 42 -- 43. Durech, J., Kaasalainen, M., Herald, D., Dunham, D., Timerson, B., Hanus, J., Frappa, E., Talbot, J., Hayamizu, T., Warner, B.D., Pilcher, F., Gal´ad, A., 2011. Combining asteroid models derived by lightcurve inversion with asteroidal occultation silhouettes. Icarus 214, 652 -- 670. 1104.4227. Durech, J., Kaasalainen, M., Warner, B.D., Fauerbach, M., Marks, S.A., Fauvaud, S., Fauvaud, M., Vugnon, J., Pilcher, F., Bernasconi, L., Behrend, R., 2009. Asteroid models from com- bined sparse and dense photometric data. Astron. Astrophys. 493, 291 -- 297. Durech, J., Scheirich, P., Kaasalainen, M., Grav, T., Jedicke, R., Den- neau, L., 2007. Physical models of asteroids from sparse photo- metric data, in: G. B. Valsecchi, D. Vokrouhlick´y, & A. Milani (Ed.), IAU Symposium, pp. 191 -- 200. Durech, J., Sidorin, V., Kaasalainen, M., 2010. DAMIT: a database of asteroid models. Astron. Astrophys. 513, A46. ESA, 1997. The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues (ESA 1997). VizieR Online Data Catalog 1239, 0. Hanus, J., Durech, J., Broz, M., Warner, B.D., Pilcher, F., Stephens, R., Oey, J., Bernasconi, L., Casulli, S., Behrend, R., Polishook, D., Henych, T., Lehk´y, M., Yoshida, F., Ito, T., 2011. A study of asteroid pole-latitude distribution based on an extended set of shape models derived by the lightcurve inversion method. Astron. Astrophys. 530, A134. 1104.4114. Hodapp, K.W., Kaiser, N., Aussel, H., Burgett, W., Chambers, K.C., Chun, M., Dombeck, T., Douglas, A., Hafner, D., Heasley, J., Hoblitt, J., Hude, C., et al., 2004. Design of the Pan-STARRS telescopes. Astronomische Nachrichten 325, 636 -- 642. Ivezi´c, Z., Tyson, J.A., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Anderson, S.F., An- drew, J., Angel, R., Axelrod, T., Barr, J.D., Becker, A.C., Be- cla, J., Beldica, C., et al., 2008. LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. ArXiv e-prints 0805.2366. Kaasalainen, M., Mottola, S., Fulchignoni, M., 2002. Asteroid Mod- els from Disk-integrated Data. Asteroids III , 139 -- 150. Kaasalainen, M., Torppa, J., 2001. Optimization Methods for Asteroid Lightcurve Inversion. I. Shape Determination. Icarus 153, 24 -- 36. Kaasalainen, M., Torppa, J., Muinonen, K., 2001. Optimization Meth- ods for Asteroid Lightcurve Inversion. II. The Complete Inverse Problem. Icarus 153, 37 -- 51. Larson, S., Beshore, E., Hill, R., Christensen, E., McLean, D., Kolar, S., McNaught, R., Garradd, G., 2003. The CSS and SSS NEO sur- veys, in: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #35, p. 982. Marciniak, A., Michałowski, T., Kaasalainen, M., Durech, J., Poli´nska, M., Kwiatkowski, T., Kryszczy´nska, A., Hirsch, R., Kami´nski, K., Fagas, M., Colas, F., Fauvaud, S., Santacana, G., Behrend, R., Roy, R., 2007. Photometry and models of selected main belt asteroids. IV. 184 Dejopeja, 276 Adelheid, 556 Phyllis. Astron. Astrophys. 473, 633 -- 639. Merline, W.J., Close, L.M., Dumas, C., Shelton, J.C., Menard, F., Chapman, C.R., Slater, D.C., 2000. Discovery of Companions to Asteroids 762 Pulcova and 90 Antiope by Direct Imaging, in: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #32, p. 1017. 6 Muller, T.G., Durech, J., Hasegawa, S., Abe, M., Kawakami, K., Ka- suga, T., Kinoshita, D., Kuroda, D., Urakawa, S., Okumura, S., Sarugaku, Y., Miyasaka, S., Takagi, Y., Weissman, P.R., Choi, Y.J., Larson, S., Yanagisawa, K., Nagayama, S., 2011. Thermo-physical properties of 162173 (1999 JU3), a potential flyby and rendezvous target for interplanetary missions. Astron. Astrophys. 525, A145. 1011.5029. Oszkiewicz, D.A., Muinonen, K., Bowell, E., Trilling, D., Penttila, A., Pieniluoma, T., Wasserman, L.H., Enga, M.T., 2011. Online multi- parameter phase-curve fitting and application to a large corpus of asteroid photometric data. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 112, 1919 -- 1929. Perryman, M.A.C., de Boer, K.S., Gilmore, G., Høg, E., Lat- tanzi, M.G., Lindegren, L., Luri, X., Mignard, F., Pace, O., de Zeeuw, P.T., 2001. GAIA: Composition, formation and evolution of the Galaxy. Astron. Astrophys. 369, 339 -- 363. ArXiv:astro-ph/0101235. Rubincam, D.P., 2000. Radiative Spin-up and Spin-down of Small Asteroids. Icarus 148, 2 -- 11. Slivan, S.M., 2002. Spin vector alignment of Koronis family asteroids. Nature 419, 49 -- 51. Slivan, S.M., Binzel, R.P., Crespo da Silva, L.D., Kaasalainen, M., Lyndaker, M.M., Krco, M., 2003. Spin vectors in the Koronis family: comprehensive results from two independent analyses of 213 rotation lightcurves. Icarus 162, 285 -- 307. Torppa, J., Kaasalainen, M., Michałowski, T., Kwiatkowski, T., Kryszczy´nska, A., Denchev, P., Kowalski, R., 2003. Shapes and rotational properties of thirty asteroids from photometric data. Icarus 164, 346 -- 383. Vokrouhlick´y, D., Nesvorn´y, D., Bottke, W.F., 2003. The vector align- ments of asteroid spins by thermal torques. Nature 425, 147 -- 151. Warner, B.D., Harris, A.W., Pravec, P., 2009. The asteroid lightcurve database. Icarus 202, 134 -- 146. 7
1703.05338	1	1703	2017-03-15T18:03:19	On the origin of the spiral morphology in the Elias 2-27 circumstellar disc	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	The young star Elias 2-27 has recently been observed to posses a massive circumstellar disc with two prominent large-scale spiral arms. In this Letter we perform three-dimensional Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics simulations, radiative transfer modelling, synthetic ALMA imaging and an unsharped masking technique to explore three possibilities for the origin of the observed structures -- an undetected companion either internal or external to the spirals, and a self-gravitating disc. We find that a gravitationally unstable disc and a disc with an external companion can produce morphology that is consistent with the observations. In addition, for the latter, we find that the companion could be a relatively massive planetary mass companion (less than approximately 10 - 13 MJup) and located at large radial distances (between approximately 300 - 700 au). We therefore suggest that Elias 2-27 may be one of the first detections of a disc undergoing gravitational instabilities, or a disc that has recently undergone fragmentation to produce a massive companion.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version September 4, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 ON THE ORIGIN OF THE SPIRAL MORPHOLOGY IN THE ELIAS 2 -- 27 CIRCUMSTELLAR DISC Farzana Meru, Attila Juh´asz, John D. Ilee, Cathie J. Clarke, Giovanni P. Rosotti, and Richard A. Booth Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK Draft version September 4, 2018 ABSTRACT The young star Elias 2-27 has recently been observed to posses a massive circumstellar disc with two prominent large-scale spiral arms. In this Letter we perform three-dimensional Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics simulations, radiative transfer modelling, synthetic ALMA imaging and an unsharped masking technique to explore three possibilities for the origin of the observed structures -- an unde- tected companion either internal or external to the spirals, and a self-gravitating disc. We find that a gravitationally unstable disc and a disc with an external companion can produce morphology that is consistent with the observations. In addition, for the latter, we find that the companion could be a relatively massive planetary mass companion ((cid:46) 10 − 13MJup) and located at large radial distances (between ≈ 300 − 700 au). We therefore suggest that Elias 2-27 may be one of the first detections of a disc undergoing gravitational instabilities, or a disc that has recently undergone fragmentation to produce a massive companion. Subject headings: stars: individual (Elias 2-27) -- stars: pre-main sequence -- hydrodynamics -- radiative transfer -- protoplanetary disks -- planet-disk interactions 1. INTRODUCTION With the advent of the Atacama Large Millimetre Ar- ray (ALMA), it has for the first time become possible to spatially resolve, and thus directly observe, the mid- plane structure of protoplanetary discs where planet for- mation processes occur. Such an extreme increase in ob- servational capability has given rise to several surprising results, examples of which include the symmetric ring structures in HL Tau (ALMA Partnership et al. 2015), TW Hydrae (Andrews et al. 2016) and HD 163296 (Isella et al. 2016), the horseshoe shaped dust traps in HD 142527 (Casassus et al. 2013), and the birth of a ternary system via disc fragmentation in L1448 IRS3B (Tobin et al. 2016). Observations such as these are extremely powerful, as sub-structure within protoplanetary discs can be a signpost of dynamical or chemical effects occur- ring within the star-disc system. Therefore, a proper understanding of their cause is essential to determine which of these processes are important during the star and planet formation process. A recent example of such a spatially-resolved observa- tion was presented by P´erez et al. (2016) in which Elias 2-27 was targeted with ALMA. Elias 2-27 is a low mass young star (M(cid:63) = 0.5 -- 0.6 M(cid:12), tage ∼ 1 Myr; Luhman & Rieke 1999; Natta et al. 2006). Based on its spectral energy distribution (SED), the system is thought to be- long to the Class II phase (Andrews et al. 2009; Evans et al. 2009), yet at the same time, observations have sug- gested an unusually large disc mass, ranging from 0.04 -- 0.14 M(cid:12) (Andrews et al. 2009; Isella et al. 2009; Ricci et al. 2010). The Elias 2-27 disc posseses two large-scale symmet- ric spiral arms (Figure 1, right). Additionally when the raw ALMA observations are processed with an unsharp masking filter, two dark crescents interior to the spirals Electronic address: [email protected] Electronic address: [email protected] Electronic address: [email protected] and a bright inner ellipse are revealed (Figure 1, left). The origin of these is unclear. With such a large disc-to- star mass ratio, could the disc be self-gravitating? Or, could an as-yet-undetected companion be causing these features via dynamical interactions? In this Letter we describe the results of hydrodynam- ical and radiative transfer modelling of the Elias 2-27 system. We produce synthetic ALMA observations to explore three possibilities that may give rise to the ob- served features -- a companion internal to the spirals, a companion external to the spirals, or gravitational insta- bilities operating within the disc. 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1. Hydrodynamics Our simulations are performed using a three- dimensional Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics code (sph) which includes the heating due to work done and the radiative transfer of energy in the flux-limited diffu- sion limit (Whitehouse et al. 2005; Whitehouse & Bate 2006). A detailed description of the code can be found in Meru (2015), however for this work we employ two dif- ferences. Firstly, boundary particles are located at every timestep, allowing the vertical location between the op- tically thick and thin region to be regularly re-evaluated, leading to more accurate boundary temperatures. Sec- ondly, we employ the Morris & Monaghan (1997) arti- ficial viscosity with the sph parameter, αSPH, varying between 0.1 -- 1.0 and βSPH = 2αSPH, to model shocks within the disc. We perform 72 hydrodynamical simulations varying a number of disc properties as well as orbit properties for the companion simulations. We first describe our refer- ence disc setup: we model a 0.5M(cid:12) star surrounded by a disc whose temperature follows (cid:18) R (cid:19)−q 200 au T (R) = 13.4K . (1) 2 Meru et al. Figure 1. Left: 1.3 mm continuum image of Elias 2-27, processed with an unsharp masking filter (originally presented by P´erez et al. 2016). Two symmetric spiral arms, a bright inner ellipse, and two dark crescents are clearly visible. The beam is shown in the lower left corner as a filled ellipse. Right: Deprojection of the original 1.3mm image with an r2 scaling applied, showing two prominent spiral arms. The white star denotes the central star's location. The apparent ring structure and the central ellipse in the left image are artefacts of the unsharp masking. The disc surface density follows (cid:18) R (cid:19)−p Rc (cid:32) exp − (cid:19)2−p(cid:33) (cid:18) R Rc Σ(R) = Σc , (2) where Σc is the surface mass density of gas at the cut-off radius, Rc. We model this disc between Rin = 10 au and Rout = 400 au using the parameters determined by P´erez et al. (2016), namely Σc = 5 g cm−2, Rc = 200 au, q = 0.45 and p = 0.7. We then perform a suite of simulations with a wide range of parameters to test the internal companion, ex- ternal companion and gravitational instability hypothe- ses. Due to the computational expense of each simula- tion, our aim is not to fit the exact parameters, but to test whether each hypothesis can reproduce the observed morphology. We vary the disc mass, surface mass den- sity profile, temperature profile, cut-off radius, and outer disc radius. We also model pure power surface density profiles, i.e. without the exponential term in equation 2, so that, once evolved, the disc has a much steeper pro- file in the outer regions. In addition, for the companion simulations, we vary the companion mass, the pericentre distance, eccentricity and inclination. Each disc is modelled using 250,000 sph gas particles. The ratio of the smoothing length to the disc scale-height is < 0.5 outside 40 -- 60 au, giving sufficient resolu- tion to probe dynamical effects on the disc. The discs are modelled with radiation hydrodynamics using flux- limited diffusion, and the surface temperature (represent- ing irradiation from the central star) is held at the profile given by Eqn. 1. For the parameters studied here, the disc is optically thick to stellar irradiation, and remains vertically isothermal at the boundary temperature be- yond a radius of 20 and 30 au in the companion and self-gravitating disc simulations, respectively. This im- plies that the thermodynamics are mainly set by external irradiation. We assume that the gas and dust are well mixed. For our self-gravitating simulations the Stokes numbers of millimeter particles are O(0.01), and thus dust trapping in the spirals is expected to be marginal (Booth & Clarke 2016; Shi & Chiang 2014). In our simulations with a companion the Stokes numbers are O(0.1). For a spi- ral to trap dust, however, it is also necessary that the timescale for it to concentrate towards the pressure max- imum (Clarke & Lodato 2009) is less than the crossing timescale of a spiral feature. Although this condition is readily met in the case of self-gravitating discs where the spirals nearly co-rotate with the Keplerian flow, this is not true in the case of a planet generated spiral which co-rotates with the planet (e.g. Paardekooper & Mellema 2006; Zhu et al. 2012; Birnstiel et al. 2013) 2.2. Radiative Transfer & Synthetic Imaging To calculate synthetic observations of our models, we use the 3D radiative transfer code radmc-3d1. The dust opacity is calculated from the optical constants for as- tronomical silicates (Weingartner & Draine 2001) using Mie-theory, assuming a power-law grain size distribution between 0.005 -- 1000 µm with a power exponent of −3.5. Outside 80 au we obtain the dust temperature and den- sity on the spherical mesh by interpolating the gas den- sity and temperature from the hydrodynamic simulations using an sph interpolation with a cubic spline smoothing kernel (Monaghan 1992) and assume a uniform gas-to- dust ratio of 100. Due to the accretion of sph particles on the central star, we extrapolate the density inwards of 80 au using a radial power-law with an exponent chosen to give a smooth transition from the results of the hy- drodynamic modelling. We assume a vertical Gaussian density distribution, whose scaleheight is calculated from the temperature given by Eq. 1. The dust and gas tem- peratures are assumed to be identical. Using these tem- peratures and densities on a spherical mesh, we calculate images at λ = 1.3 mm using the raytracer in radmc-3d. 1 http://www.ita.uni-heidelberg.de/dullemond/software/radmc- 3d/ 'ec.ALMA6SirDl Drms(lliSseCrescents16h26m45.1s45.0s44.9s-24°23'07.0"08.0"09.0"10.0"5.A.10-210-1Sν (DrEitrDry units)-300-200-1000100200300[au]-300-200-1000100200300[au]1.01.21.51.82.02.22.52.83.0r2Sν (arbitrary units)On the disc morphology in Elias 2 -- 27 3 Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the Elias 2-27 system based on the results of P´erez et al. (2016). Also shown are the companion mass limits based on observations (i) by Ratzka et al. (2005), (ii) from the UKIDSS data and (iii) theoretical gap-opening limits (see Section 2.3.2). Synthetic observations for ALMA are calculated us- ing the Common Astronomy Software Application v4.5 (CASA, McMullin et al. 2007). Visibilities are calculated with the simobserve task while imaging is performed with the clean task. Since our goal is not to fit the ob- servations exactly, but merely to show the morphological similarities between our models and the observations, we do not use exactly the same (u, v) co-ordinates as the ob- servations to calculate our visibilities. Instead, we choose an antenna configuration in CASA (alma.out13) which results in a very similar synthesised beam to that of the real data: 0.27(cid:48)(cid:48)×0.25(cid:48)(cid:48) with PA = 86◦. To ensure our synthetic observations are as close to the real data as possible, we use a bandwidth of 6.8 GHz, assume a pre- cipitable water vapour column of 2.7 mm, and a total integration time of 725 seconds. We then apply an unsharp masking filter to the images in a similar manner to P´erez et al. (2016). This involves convolving the image with a Gaussian kernel with a full width half maximum (FWHM) of 0.33(cid:48)(cid:48) and subtracting a scaled version of the result from the original image. This acts to remove large scale emission and boost the contrast of small scale structures. 2.3. Observational constraints We describe various observational constraints that ap- ply to the Elias 2-27 system, which we use when testing the three possible scenarios. 2.3.1. Constraints on the total system mass The 12CO J = 2 − 1 emission toward Elias 2-27 seems to be undergoing Keplerian rotation out to ∼ 630 au, and according to kinematic modelling, the enclosed mass interior to the emission is 0.5±0.2M(cid:12) (P´erez et al. 2016). However, absorption by the surrounding molecular cloud significantly obscures the red-shifted component of the emission, leading to some uncertainty in these derived masses. 2.3.2. Constraints on the mass of a potential companion A volume-limited multiplicity survey of the ρ-Ophiuci molecular cloud was performed by Ratzka et al. (2005). Elias 2-27 was found to be a single star with an up- per limit on the K-band contrast of 2.5 mag between 0.13 -- 6.4(cid:48)(cid:48). Additionally, the area around Elias 2-27 has been targeted by the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Sur- vey (UKIDSS, e.g. Lawrence et al. 2007). The closest point source is located approximately 14(cid:48)(cid:48) to the South (16h26m44.95s, −24◦23(cid:48)21.88(cid:48)(cid:48)) with a K-band magni- tude of 15.9 mag, giving a K-band contrast of 7.5 mag with Elias 2-27. The limiting magnitude of the survey in the K-band (17.8 mag) suggests a maximum contrast with Elias 2-27 of 9.4 mag for any undetected sources. Using the NextGen atmosphere models (Allard et al. 1997; Baraffe et al. 1998; Hauschildt et al. 1999), we con- vert these K-band contrasts to upper limits for the mass of any potential companion, Mcomp, for various orbital distances from Elias 2-27. Assuming all objects lie at the same distance as Elias 2-27 (139 pc), the UKIDSS data excludes any unseen companions > 0.01M(cid:12) beyond 420au (with the exception of the closest source mentioned above, which would translate to Mcomp ≈ 0.02M(cid:12) at 2000 au). Inside 420au a companion up to 0.08M(cid:12) could be present based on Ratzka et al. (2005). P´erez et al. (2016) present 12CO, C18O and 13CO ob- servations which combined, show the presence of gas out to ≈ 630 au. Based on their channel maps and the PV diagram of 12CO, there is no strong indication of a gap in the gas (though we note that the signal-to-noise is low). In order to not open up a gap in the gas a planet must satisfy the viscosity and pressure conditions for gap- opening (Equations 68 and 69 of Lin & Papaloizou 1993; see also Crida et al. 2006). Between 300 − 420 au (i.e. 4 Meru et al. Figure 3. Top: Unsharp masked images of a disc with an internal companion (left), external companion (middle) and a gravitationally unstable disc (right). The internal companion is not compatible with the observations. The external companion simulations and the gravitationally unstable disc simulations show the closest match to the observation in Figure 1. Bottom: Deprojected mock ALMA images with an r2 scaling of the simulations in the top panel (analogous to Figure 1 right). The intensity of the gravitationally unstable disc has been scaled down by a factor of 1.5 before the r2 scaling is applied (see Section 4). The simulations are run for 1.6, 1.2 and 3.75 orbits at 350au in the internal companion, external companion and self-gravitating disc simulations, respectively. from the spirals to where the UKIDSS observations be- come relevant), the pressure condition is more stringent for α (cid:46) 0.015 providing a gap-opening mass of ≈ 13MJup (though this mass limit is likely to be higher for migrating planets; Malik et al. 2015). Beyond 420au the UKIDSS limit is more stringent than any realistic gap-opening mass. Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram illustrating the observational and theoretical constraints. 3. RESULTS We require the unsharp masked synthetic observations of the simulated discs to display morphology that is con- sistent with the observations. This constitutes three main features -- i) two large-scale symmetric spiral arms, ii) two dark crescents interior to the spirals, and iii) a bright inner ellipse along the major axis of the disc (see Figure 1, left). The spiral arms are visible in the un- sharped masking and deprojected images while the dark crescents and bright inner ellipse are only present in the unsharped masking image. The discs presented in Fig- ure 3 employ a steep outer disc edge rather than an ex- ponentially tapered disc. 3.1. Internal companion Figure 3 (left) shows the simulated observation for one of our internal companion simulations. The disc is a 0.08M(cid:12) disc with Σ ∝ R−0.75 and T ∝ R−0.75, and in- cludes a 0.01M(cid:12) companion at 140 au that is allowed to accrete from the disc and grow to approximately 0.03M(cid:12). The companion clears a large gap in the disc, forming the required central elliptical feature, but without the dark crescents or two armed spiral as in the original unsharped masking observations. A lower companion mass does not generate the large-scale spirals, while higher mass com- panions remove large amounts of material from the disc. We therefore suggest that the morphology in Elias 2-27 is unlikely to be due to an undetected companion internal to the spirals. 3.2. External companion Figure 3 (centre) shows the simulated observations for one of our external companion simulations. This disc is the same as that in Section 3.1 but includes a ≈ 10MJup companion at ≈ 425 au. The simulated unsharped mask- ing observation reproduces the large-scale spiral arms, the dark crescents and the bright inner ellipse, while the deprojected image shows two large-scale spirals analo- gous to Figure 1 (right). We also note that simula- tions with companions located much beyond the gas disc ((cid:38) 700 au) can only reproduce the observed morphology by violating the companion mass limits in Section 2.3.2. 3.3. Gravitationally unstable disc EXTERNAL16h26m45.1s45.0s44.9s-24°23'06.0"07.0"08.0"09.0"10.0"5.A.'ec.10-210-1Sν (DrbitrDry units)G.I.16h26m45.1s45.0s44.9s-24°23'06.0"07.0"08.0"09.0"10.0"5.A.'ec.10-210-1Sν (DrbitrDry units)INTERNAL16h26m45.1s45.0s44.9s-24°23'06.0"07.0"08.0"09.0"10.0"5.A.'ec.10-210-1Sν (DrbitrDry units)-300-200-1000100200300[au]-300-200-1000100200300[au]2.02.22.52.83.03.23.53.8r2Sν (arbitrary units)-300-200-1000100200300[au]-300-200-1000100200300[au]2.02.22.52.83.03.23.53.8r2Sν (arbitrary units)-300-200-1000100200300[au]-300-200-1000100200300[au]1.01.21.51.82.02.22.52.83.0r2Sν (arbitrary units)On the disc morphology in Elias 2 -- 27 5 Figure 3 (right) shows the simulated observation for a gravitationally unstable disc with Σ ∝ R−0.5 and T ∝ R−0.75. The disc mass is 0.24 M(cid:12), leading to a disc- to-star mass ratio of 0.49. Even with this relatively mas- sive disc, the combined system mass lies within the limits discussed in Section 2.3.1. The simulated unsharp mask- ing observation reproduces the large-scale spiral arms, the dark crescents and the bright inner ellipse, while the deprojected image shows two large-scale spirals analo- gous to Figure 1 (right). 4. DISCUSSION The combination of our hydrodynamic modelling and simulated observations allows us to put strong con- straints on the disc structure from which the sub- millimetre continuum emission originates. Throughout all of our models, we find that a steeply declining surface mass density beyond ≈ 300 au is key to producing a close match to the masked image. Figure 4 shows the scaled radial intensity profile of our successful self-gravitating disc and the radial intensity profile of the successful com- panion simulations compared to the observational data from P´erez et al. (2016) and the model of Andrews et al. (2009). The steep decline beyond ≈ 300 au in our sim- ulation manifests itself in the form of a steep emission profile at large radii that turns over at approximately the right radius, matching the observed profile well. The modest scaling factor for the self-gravitating disc (∼ 1.5) is well within uncertainties associated with dust-to-gas ratios and/or grain opacities for circumstellar discs. We note that the resulting Toomre profile dips marginally below 1 for a limited radial range in our suc- cessful self-gravitating disc. However, this disc shows no sign of fragmentation even though we evolve it for many dynamical times for this radial range. On the other hand a companion beyond the spirals ((cid:38) 300 au) is unlikely to have formed by core accretion. This suggests that, should the companion hypothesis be correct, this would hint that the Elias 2-27 disc may have formed a fragment by gravitational instability in the past. We also stress the importance of applying an unsharp mask to our simulated observations. While such a mask is primarily applied to increase the contrast of the image, subtle changes are introduced to the resulting image that allow us to remove models from consideration. Changes in the surface density profile affect the radial locations at which there is an excess or deficit with respect to a Gaussian mask. This is illustrated in Figure 5 which shows a disc modelled using the properties presented by P´erez et al. (2016) (see Section 2.1 for details) i.e. with an exponential surface mass density profile, which does not reproduce the observations well. Therefore while a range of models replicate the spirals seen in the unprocessed ALMA image (e.g. Tomida et al. 2017), comparison of masked images constrains the disc properties further. However, special care must be taken when interpreting unsharp masked images. This is because some structures may not be real, but artificially created by the mask- ing. For example, while Figure 1 (left) superficially sug- gests that a gap exists in the disc, similar structures in the masked images of the external companion and self- gravitating disc in Figure 3 are generated by the inter- action of the mask with a smoothly declining emissivity Figure 4. Radial emission profiles for the successful gravitation- ally unstable disc simulation (red), which has been decreased by a factor of ∼ 1.5 (see text) and the successful companion disc simu- lation (blue). Also shown are data from P´erez et al. (2016) (black points) and the best fit model from Andrews et al. (2009) (black dash). The steep decline beyond ≈ 300 au is key to matching the observed morphology in the simulated images. profile. Masked images of observations therefore need to be interpreted via the type of forward modelling exercise undertaken here. A two-armed spiral structure, as observed around Elias 2-27, is consistent with high disc-to-star mass ratios (e.g. Lodato & Rice 2005). Indeed Tomida et al. (2017), who suggested that the Elias 2-27 disc is self-gravitating, ob- tained a high disc-to-star-mass ratio in their simulations. The shocks associated with spiral arms in self-gravitating discs have been shown to have an effect on the chemistry of the disc material (Ilee et al. 2011; Hincelin et al. 2013; Evans et al. 2015) leading to the prospect of detecting the features in line emission (Douglas et al. 2013). Fu- ture observations of the Elias 2-27 system, with sensitiv- ities high enough to spatially resolve relevant molecular line transitions (e.g. CO, HCO+, OCS and H2CO) will be crucial in further evaluating the dynamics occurring within the star-disc system. Finally, deep near infrared imaging should offer a first step towards deciding which scenario is at work in the system. If no companion is detected, gravitationally in- stability is likely. Otherwise further follow-up observa- tions would be required to confirm any possible detected companion. 5. CONCLUSIONS We present the results of a series of hydrodynamic and radiative transfer models to test three hypotheses regard- ing the origin of the disc morphology around Elias 2-27 -- a companion internal or external to the spirals, and a gravitationally unstable disc. Our results show that a steep decline in surface mass density beyond ≈ 300 au is required, and that the gravitational instability hypothe- sis or a (cid:46) 10−13MJup companion between ≈ 300−700 au can reproduce all components of the observed morphol- 101102Radius [au]10-410-310-210-1100Sº [Jy arcsec-2]G.I. (rescaled)ExternalBest-fit model from Andrews et al. 2009Radial profile of emission from Perez et al. 20166 Meru et al. Figure 5. Left: surface density of an external companion simulation (see Section 4 for details) which displays prominent two-armed spirals. This simulation involved a 0.5M(cid:12) companion on a circular orbit at R = 1200 au and was run for 1.3 orbits at 1200au. Right: unsharp masked image of this simulation, which is unable to reproduce the morphology due to higher levels of emission in the inner disc. ogy. Given this, we suggest that Elias 2-27 may be one of the first examples of an observed self-gravitating disc or a disc that has recently fragmented forming a (cid:46) 10 − 13MJup planet. We thank Mike Irwin for obtaining UKIDSS pho- tometry, and Jim Pringle and the referee for use- ful comments. We acknowledge support from the DISCSIM project, grant agreement 341137 under ERC- 2013-ADG. FM acknowledges support from The Lev- erhulme Trust. This paper uses the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA# 2013.1.00498.S. This work used the Darwin DiRAC HPC cluster at the Univer- sity of Cambridge, and the Cambridge COSMOS SMP system funded by ST/J005673/1, ST/H008586/1 and ST/K00333X/1 grants. REFERENCES Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R., & Starrfield, S. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 137 ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C. L., P´erez, L. M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, L3 Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., Qi, C., & Dullemond, C. P. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1502 Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Zhu, Z., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, L40 Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, A&A, 337, 403 Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Price, N. M. 1995, MNRAS, 277, 362 Benz, W. 1990, in Numerical Modelling of Nonlinear Stellar Pulsations Problems and Prospects,, ed. J. R. Buchler (Kluwer, Dordrecht), 269 Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., & Pinilla, P. 2013, A&A, 550, L8 Booth, R. A., & Clarke, C. J. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2676 Casassus, S., van der Plas, G., M, S. P., et al. 2013, Nature, 493, 191 Clarke, C. J., & Lodato, G. 2009, MNRAS, 398, L6 Crida, A., Morbidelli, A., & Masset, F. 2006, Icarus, 181, 587 Douglas, T. A., Caselli, P., Ilee, J. D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 2064 Evans, M. G., Ilee, J. D., Boley, A. C., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 1147 Evans, II, N. J., Dunham, M. M., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2009, ApJS, 181, 321 Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., & Baron, E. 1999, ApJ, 512, 377 Hincelin, U., Wakelam, V., Commer¸con, B., Hersant, F., & Guilloteau, S. 2013, ApJ, 775, 44 Ilee, J. D., Boley, A. C., Caselli, P., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2950 Isella, A., Carpenter, J. M., & Sargent, A. I. 2009, ApJ, 701, 260 Isella, A., Guidi, G., Testi, L., et al. 2016, Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 251101. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.251101 Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599 Lin, D. N. C., & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, ed. E. H. Levy & J. I. Lunine, 749 -- 835 Lodato, G., & Rice, W. K. M. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 1489 Luhman, K. L., & Rieke, G. H. 1999, ApJ, 525, 440 Malik, M., Meru, F., Mayer, L., & Meyer, M. 2015, ApJ, 802, 56 McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, 127 Meru, F. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2529 Monaghan, J. J. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 543 Morris, J. P., & Monaghan, J. J. 1997, J. Comp. Phys., 136, 41 Natta, A., Testi, L., & Randich, S. 2006, A&A, 452, 245 Paardekooper, S.-J., & Mellema, G. 2006, A&A, 453, 1129 P´erez, L. M., Carpenter, J. M., Andrews, S. M., et al. 2016, Science, 353, 1519 Price, D. J., & Bate, M. R. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 77 Ratzka, T., Kohler, R., & Leinert, C. 2005, A&A, 437, 611 Ricci, L., Testi, L., Natta, A., & Brooks, K. J. 2010, A&A, 521, A66 Shi, J.-M., & Chiang, E. 2014, ApJ, 789, 34 Tobin, J. J., Kratter, K. M., Persson, M. V., et al. 2016, Nature, 538, 483 Tomida, K., Machida, M. N., Hosokawa, T., Sakurai, Y., & Lin, C. H. 2017, ApJ, 835, L11 Weingartner, J. C., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 548, 296 Whitehouse, S. C., & Bate, M. R. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 32 Whitehouse, S. C., Bate, M. R., & Monaghan, J. J. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1367 Zhu, Z., Nelson, R. P., Dong, R., Espaillat, C., & Hartmann, L. 2012, ApJ, 755, 6 -1-0.500.5log column density [g/cm2]0400-400-4000400200-200-200200x [au]y [au]log Surface Density [g cm-2]0.50-0.5-1EXTERNAL16h26m45.1s45.0s44.9s-24°23'06.0"07.0"08.0"09.0"10.0"R.A.Dec.10-310-210-1Sº (arbitrary units)
0912.2996	1	0912	2009-12-15T21:00:10	A single sub-km Kuiper Belt object from a stellar Occultation in archival data	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	The Kuiper belt is a remnant of the primordial Solar System. Measurements of its size distribution constrain its accretion and collisional history, and the importance of material strength of Kuiper belt objects (KBOs). Small, sub-km sized, KBOs elude direct detection, but the signature of their occultations of background stars should be detectable. Observations at both optical and X-ray wavelengths claim to have detected such occultations, but their implied KBO abundances are inconsistent with each other and far exceed theoretical expectations. Here, we report an analysis of archival data that reveals an occultation by a body with a 500 m radius at a distance of 45 AU. The probability of this event to occur due to random statistical fluctuations within our data set is about 2%. Our survey yields a surface density of KBOs with radii larger than 250 m of 2.1^{+4.8}_{-1.7} x 10^7 deg^{-2}, ruling out inferred surface densities from previous claimed detections by more than 5 sigma. The fact that we detected only one event, firmly shows a deficit of sub-km sized KBOs compared to a population extrapolated from objects with r>50 km. This implies that sub-km sized KBOs are undergoing collisional erosion, just like debris disks observed around other stars.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	A single sub-km Kuiper Belt object from a stellar Occultation in archival data H. E. Schlichting1,2, E. O. Ofek1,3, M. Wenz4, R. Sari1,5, A. Gal-Yam6, M. Livio7, E. Nelan7, S. Zucker8 1 Department of Astronomy, 249-17, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2 CITA, University of Toronto, 60 St. George St., ON, M5S 3H8, Canada 3 Einstein Fellow 4 Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 5 Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel 6 Faculty of Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, POB 26, Rehovot 76100, Israel 7 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 8 Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel The Kuiper belt is a remnant of the primordial Solar System. Measurements of its size distribution constrain its accretion and collisional history, and the importance of material strength of Kuiper belt objects (KBOs)(1; 2; 3; 4). Small, sub-km sized, KBOs elude direct detection, but the signature of their occultations of background stars should be detectable(5; 6; 7; 8; 9). Observations at both optical(10) and X- ray(11) wavelengths claim to have detected such occultations, but their implied KBO abundances are inconsistent with each other and far exceed theoretical expectations. Here, we report an analysis of archival data that reveals an occultation by a body with a ∼500 m radius at a distance of 45 AU. The probability of this event to occur due to random statistical fluctuations within our data set is about 2%. Our survey yields a surface density of KBOs with radii larger than 250 m of 2.1+4.8 −1.7 × 107 deg−2, ruling out inferred surface densities from previous claimed detections by more than 5 σ. The fact that we detected only one event, firmly shows a deficit of sub-km sized KBOs compared to a population extrapolated from objects with r > 50 km. This implies that sub-km-sized KBOs are undergoing collisional erosion, just like debris disks observed around other stars. A small KBO crossing the line of sight to a star will partially obscure the stellar light, an event which can be detected in the star's light curve. For visible light, the characteristic scale of diffraction effects, known as the Fresnel scale, is given by (λa/2)1/2 ∼ 1.3 km, where a ∼ 40 AU is the distance to the Kuiper belt and λ ∼ 600 nm is the wavelength of our observations. Diffraction effects will be apparent in the star's light curve due to occulting KBOs provided that both star and the occulting object are smaller than the Fresnel scale (12; 13). Occultations by objects smaller than the Fresnel scale are in the Fraunhofer regime. In this regime the diffraction pattern is determined by the size of the KBO and its distance -- 2 -- to the observer, the angular size of the star, the wavelength range of the observations and the impact parameter between the star and the KBO (see Supplementary Information for details). The duration of the occultation is approximately given by the ratio of the Fresnel scale to the relative velocity perpendicular to the line of sight between the observer and the KBO. Since the relative velocity is usually dominated by the Earth's velocity around the Sun, which is 30 km s−1, typical occultations only last of order of a tenth of a second. Extensive ground based efforts have been conducted to look for optical occultations (10; 9; 14; 15). To date, these visible searches have announced no detections in the region of the Kuiper belt (30-60 AU), but one of these quests claims to have detected some events beyond 100 AU and at about 15 AU (10). Unfortunately, ground based surveys may suffer from a high rate of false-positives due to atmospheric scintillation, and lack the stability of space based platforms. The ground breaking idea to search for occultations in archival RXTE X-ray data resulted in several claimed occultation events (11). Later, revised analysis of the X-ray data (16; 17; 18; 19) conclude that the majority of the originally reported events are most likely due to instrumental dead time effects. Thus, previous reports of optical and X-ray events remain dubious (14) and their inferred KBO abundance is inconsistent with the observed break in the KBO size distribution, which has been obtained from direct detections of large KBOs (20; 21; 22). Furthermore, they are also difficult to reconcile with theoretical expectations, which predict collisional evolution for KBOs smaller than a few km in size (23; 4) and hence a lower KBO abundance than inferred from extrapolation from KBOs with r > 50 km. For the past 14 years, the Fine Guidance Sensors (FGS ) on board of Hubble Space Telescope (HST ) have been collecting photometric measurements of stars with 40 Hz time resolution, allowing for the detection of the occultation diffraction pattern rather than a simple decrease in the photon count. We examined four and a half years of archival FGS data, which contain ∼ 12, 000 star hours of low ecliptic latitude (b < 20◦) observations. Our survey is most likely to detect occultations by KBOs that are 200-500 m in radius given the signal-to-noise of our data (Supplementary Figure 3) and a power-law size distri- bution with power-law index between 3 and 4.5. Occultation events in this size range are in the Fraunhofer regime where the depth of the diffraction pattern varies linearly with the area of the occulting object and is independent of its shape. The theoretical light curves for our search algorithm were therefore calculated in this regime. We fitted these theoretical occultation templates to the FGS data and performed χ2 analysis to identify occultation candidates (see Supplementary Information). We detected one occultation candidate, at ecliptic latitude 14◦, that significantly exceeds our detection criterion (Figure 1). The best fit parameters yield a KBO size of r = 520 ± 60 m and a distance of 45+5 −4 AU where we assumed a circular KBO orbit and an inclination of 14◦. Using bootstrap simulations, we estimate a probability of ∼ 2% that such an event is caused by statistical fluctuations over the whole analyzed FGS data set (Supplementary Figure 7). We note that for objects on circular orbits around the sun two solutions can fit the duration of the event. However, the -- 3 -- other solution is at a distance of 0.07 AU from the Earth, and is therefore unlikely. It is also unlikely that the occulting object was located in the Asteroid belt, since the expected occultation rate from Asteroids is about two orders of magnitude less than our implied rate. Furthermore, an Asteroid would have to have an eccentricity of order unity to be able to explain the duration of the observed occultation event. Using the KBO ecliptic latitude distribution from Elliot et. al (2005) (24), our detection efficency, and our single detection, we constrain the surface density around the ecliptic (averaged over −5◦ < b < 5◦) of KBOs with radii larger than 250 m to 2.1+4.8 −1.7 × 107 deg−2 (see Supplementary Information Sections 5 and 6). This surface density is about three times the implied surface density at 5.5◦ ecliptic latitude and about five times the surface density at 8 − 20◦ ecliptic latitude. This is the first measurement of the surface density of hecto-meter-sized KBOs and it improves previous upper limits by more than an order of magnitude (9; 15). Figure 2 displays our measurement for the sub-km KBO surface density and summarizes published upper limits from various surveys. Our original data analysis focused on the detection of KBOs located at the distance of the Kuiper belt between 30 AU and 60 AU. In order to compare our results with previously reported ground-based detections beyond 100 AU (10), we performed a second search of the FGS data that was sensitive to objects located beyond the classical Kuiper belt. Our results challenge the reported ground- based detections of two 300 m-sized objects beyond 100 AU (10). Given our total number of star hours and a detection efficency of 3% for 300 m-sized objects at ∼ 100 AU we should have detected more than twenty occultations. We therefore rule out the previously claimed optical detections (10) by more than 5 σ. This result accounts for the broad latitude distribution of our observations (i.e., b < 20◦) and the quoted detection efficency of our survey includes the effect of the finite angular radii of the guide stars at 100 AU. The KBO cumulative size distribution is parameterized by N(> r) ∝ r1−q, where N(> r) is the number of objects with radii greater than r, and q is the power-law index. The power-law index for KBOs with radii above ∼45 km is ∼ 4.5 (21; 22) and there is evidence for a break in the size distribution at about rbreak ∼ 45 km (20; 21; 22). We hence use this break radius and assume a surface density for KBOs larger than rbreak (25) of 5.4 deg−2 around the ecliptic. Accounting for our detection efficency, the velocity distribution of the HST observations, and assuming a single power-law for objects with radii less than 45 km in size, we find q = 3.9+0.3,+0.4 −0.3,−0.7 (1 and 2 σ errors) below the break. Our results firmly show a deficit of sub-km sized KBOs compared to large objects. This confirms the existence of the previously reported break and establishes a shallower size distribution extending two orders of magnitude in size down to sub-km sized objects. This suggests that sub-km sized KBOs underwent collisional evolution, eroding the smaller KBOs. This collisional grinding in the Kuiper belt provides the missing link between large KBOs and dust producing debris disks around other stars. Currently our results are consistent with a power-law index of strength dominated collisional cascade (23), q = 3.5, within 1.3σ and with predictions for strengthless rubble piles (4), q = 3.0, within 2.4σ. An intermediate value of 3 < q < 3.5 implies that -- 4 -- KBOs are strengthless rubble piles above some critical size, rc < r < 45 km, and strength dominated below it, r < rc. Our observations constrain for the first time rc. At the 2 σ level we find rc > 3 km. Using our estimate for the size distribution power-law index (q = 3.9) and our KBO surface density for 250 m sized KBOs at an ecliptic latitude of b = 5.5◦, which is the ecliptic latitude of the RXTE observations of Scorpius X-1, we predict that there should be ∼ 3.6 × 109 30 m-radius objects per square degree. This is about 150 times less than the original estimate from X-ray observations of Scorpius X-1 that reported 58 events (11), and it is about 30 times less than the revised estimate from the same X-ray observations, which concludes that up to 12 events might be actual KBO occultations (16). Our results rule out the implied surface density from these 12 events at 7 σ confidence level. One can reconcile our results and the claimed X-ray detections only by invoking a power-law index of q ∼ 5.5 between 250 m and 30 m. More recent X-ray work reports no new detections in the region of the Kuiper belt but places an upper limit of 1.7 ×1011 deg−2 for objects of 50 m in radius and larger (18). This is consistent with the KBO surface density of N(> 50 m) = 8.2 × 108 deg−2 that we derive by extrapolating from our detection in the hecto-meter size range. The statistical confidence level on our detection is 98%. However, our conclusions that there is a significant break in the size distribution and that collisional erosion is taking place and the significant discrepancy with previously claimed occultation detections rely on the low number of events we discovered. These conclusions would only be strengthened if this event was caused by an unlikely statistical fluctuation or a yet unknown instrumental artifact. Ongoing analysis of the remaining FGS data, which will triple the number of star hours, together with further development of our detection algorithm (i.e., including a larger number of light curve templates) holds the promise for additional detections of occultation events and will allow us to constrain the power-law index of the size distribution further. -- 5 -- REFERENCES (1) Davis, D. R. & Farinella, P. Collisional Evolution of Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt Objects. Icarus 125, 50 -- 60 January 1997. (2) Stern, S. A. & Colwell, J. E. Collisional Erosion in the Primordial Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt and the Generation of the 30-50 AU Kuiper Gap. ApJ 490, 879 -- 882 December 1997. (3) Kenyon, S. J. & Luu, J. X. Accretion in the Early Kuiper Belt. II. Fragmentation. AJ 118, 1101 -- 1119 August 1999. (4) Pan, M. & Sari, R. Shaping the Kuiper belt size distribution by shattering large but strengthless bodies. Icarus 173, 342 -- 348 February 2005. (5) Bailey, M. E. Can 'invisible' bodies be observed in the solar system. Nature 259, 290 -- 291 January 1976. (6) Dyson, F. J. Hunting for comets and planets. QJRAS 33, 45 -- 57 June 1992. (7) Axelrod, T. S., Alcock, C., Cook, K. H. & Park, H.-S. in Robotic Telescopes in the 1990s (ed Filippenko, A. V.) 171 -- 181 1992). (8) Roques, F., Moncuquet, M. & Sicardy, B. Stellar occultations by small bodies - Diffrac- tion effects. AJ 93, 1549 -- 1558 June 1987. (9) Zhang, Z.-W., Bianco, F. B., Lehner, M. J., Coehlo, N. K., Wang, J.-H. et al. First Results from the Taiwanese-American Occultation Survey (TAOS). ApJ 685, L157 -- L160 October 2008. (10) Roques, F., Doressoundiram, A., Dhillon, V., Marsh, T., Bickerton, S. et al. Exploration of the Kuiper Belt by High-Precision Photometric Stellar Occultations: First Results. AJ 132, 819 -- 822 August 2006. (11) Chang, H.-K., King, S.-K., Liang, J.-S., Wu, P.-S., Lin, L. C.-C. et al. Occultation of X-rays from Scorpius X-1 by small trans-neptunian objects. Nature 442, 660 -- 663 August 2006. (12) Roques, F. & Moncuquet, M. A Detection Method for Small Kuiper Belt Objects: The Search for Stellar Occultations. Icarus 147, 530 -- 544 October 2000. (13) Nihei, T. C., Lehner, M. J., Bianco, F. B., King, S.-K., Giammarco, J. M. et al. Detectability of Occultations of Stars by Objects in the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud. AJ 134, 1596 -- 1612 October 2007. -- 6 -- (14) Bickerton, S. J., Kavelaars, J. J. & Welch, D. L. A Search for SUB-km Kuiper Belt Objects with the Method of Serendipitous Stellar Occultations. AJ 135, 1039 -- 1049 March 2008. (15) Bianco, F. B., Protopapas, P., McLeod, B. A., Alcock, C. R., Holman, M. J. et al. A Search for Occultations of Bright Stars by Small Kuiper Belt Objects using Megacam on the MMT. AJ 138, 568 -- 578 August 2009. (16) Chang, H.-K., Liang, J.-S., Liu, C.-Y. & King, S.-K. Millisecond dips in the RXTE/PCA light curve of Sco X-1 and trans-Neptunian object occultation. MNRAS 378, 1287 -- 1297 July 2007. (17) Jones, T. A., Levine, A. M., Morgan, E. H. & Rappaport, S. Production of Millisecond Dips in Sco X-1 Count Rates by Dead Time Effects. ApJ 677, 1241 -- 1247 April 2008. (18) Liu, C.-Y., Chang, H.-K., Liang, J.-S. & King, S.-K. Millisecond dip events in the 2007 RXTE/PCA data of Sco X-1 and the trans-Neptunian object size distribution. MNRAS 388, L44 -- L48 July 2008. (19) Blocker, A. W., Protopapas, P.& Alcock, C. R. A Bayesian Approach to the Analysis of Time Symmetry in Light Curves: Reconsidering Scorpius X-1 Occultations. ApJ 701, 1742 -- 1752 August 2009. (20) Bernstein, G. M., Trilling, D. E., Allen, R. L., Brown, M. E., Holman, M. et al. The Size Distribution of Trans-Neptunian Bodies. AJ 128, 1364 -- 1390 September 2004. (21) Fuentes, C. I. & Holman, M. J. a SUBARU Archival Search for Faint Trans-Neptunian Objects. AJ 136, 83 -- 97 July 2008. (22) Fraser, W. C., Kavelaars, J. J., Holman, M. J., Pritchet, C. J., Gladman, B. J. et al. The Kuiper belt luminosity function from m(R)=21 to 26. Icarus 195, 827 -- 843 June 2008. (23) Dohnanyi, J. W. Collisional models of asteroids and their debris. J. Geophys. Res. 74, 2531 -- 2554 (1969). (24) Elliot, J. L., Kern, S. D., Clancy, K. B., Gulbis, A. A. S., Millis, R. L. et al. The Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. II. Dynamical Classification, the Kuiper Belt Plane, and the Core Population. AJ 129, 1117 -- 1162 February 2005. (25) Fuentes, C. I., George, M. R. & Holman, M. J. A Subaru Pencil-Beam Search for m(R) ∼ 27 Trans-Neptunian Bodies. ApJ 696, 91 -- 95 May 2009. (26) Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M. D., Schneider, S. et al. The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). AJ 131, 1163 -- 1183 February 2006. -- 7 -- (27) Monet, D. G., Levine, S. E., Canzian, B., Ables, H. D., Bird, A. R. et al. The USNO-B Catalog. AJ 125, 984 -- 993 February 2003. (28) Roques, F., Georgevits, G. & Doressoundiram, A. The Kuiper Belt Explored by Serendipitous Stellar Occultations. The University of Arizona Press, 545 -- 556 2008. Acknowledgments We thank Dr. H. K. Chang for valuable comments that helped to im- prove this manuscript. Some of the numerical calculations presented here were performed on Caltech's Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences Dell cluster. Partial support for this research was provided by NASA through a grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute. R. S. acknowledges support from the ERC and the Packard Foundation. A. G. is supported by the Israeli Science Foundation, an EU Seventh Framework Programme Marie Curie IRG fellowship and the Benoziyo Center for Astrophysics, a research grant from the Peter and Patricia Gruber Awards, and the William Z. and Eda Bess Novick New Scientists Fund at the Weizmann Institute. S. Z. acknowledges support from the Israel Science Foundation -- Adler Foundation for Space Research. Author Contributions H. E. S. wrote the detection algorithm, analyzed the FGS data for occultation events, calculated the detection efficency of the survey, preformed the bootstrap analysis and wrote the paper. E. O. O. calculated the stellar angular radii, the velocity information of the observations, the correlated noise and other statistical properties of the data. R. S. guided this work and helped with the scientific interpretation of the results. A.G. proposed using HST FGS data for occultation studies and helped to make the data avail- able for analysis. M. W. extracted the FGS photometry streams and provided coordinates and magnitudes of the guide stars. M. L. helped in gaining access to the FGS data and provided insights into the operation and noise properties of the FGS . E. N. provided expert interpretation of the FGS photometric characteristics in the HST operational environment. S. Z. took part in the statistical analysis of the data. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. Author Information Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to H. E. S. ([email protected]) or E. O. O. ([email protected]). This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. -- 8 -- a 1.5 2 b -0.5 -1 1 time relative to mid eclipse (s) 0 0.5 -2 -1.5 t n u o c t n o o h p t n u o c n o t o h p 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 time relative to mid eclipse (s) Fig. 1. -- Photon counts as a function of time of the candidate occultation event observed by FGS2. Part a) shows the photon count spanning ±2 seconds around the occultation event. Part b) displays the event in detail. The red crosses and error bars are the FGS data points with Poisson error bars, the dashed, blue line is the theoretical diffraction pattern (calculated for the 400-700 nm wavelength range of the FGS observations), and the pink squares correspond to the theoretical light curve integrated over 40 Hz intervals. Note, the actual noise for this observation is about 4% larger than Poisson noise due to additional noise sources such as dark counts (about 3 to 6 counts in a 40 Hz interval), and jitter due to the displacement of the guide star (by up to 10 mas) from its null position. The mean signal-to-noise ratio in a 40 Hz interval for the roughly half an hour of observations is ∼ 12. The event occurred at UTC 05:17:49 2007, Mar 24. The best fit χ2/dof is 20.1/21. The star has an ecliptic latitude of +14. Its angular radius and effective temperature are ≈ 0.3 of the Fresnel scale and ≈ 4460 K, respectively. These values were derived by fitting the 2MASS (26) JHK and USNO-B1 BR (27) photometry with a black-body spectrum. The position of the star is R.A.=186.87872◦, Dec=12.72469◦ (J2000) and its estimated V-magnitude is 13.4. The auto- correlation function (excluding lag zero) of the photometric time series of this event is consistent with zero within the statistical uncertainty. Each FGS provides two independent PMT readings and we confirmed that the occultation signature is present in both of these independent photon counts. We examined the photon counts of the other guide star that was observed by FGS1 at the time of the occultation and confirmed that the occultation signal is only present in the observations recorded by FGS2. We examined the engineering telemetry for HST around the time of the event and verified that the guiding performance of HST was normal. We therefore conclude that the above occultation pattern is not caused by any known instrumental artifacts. -- 9 -- FGS FGS RXTE Jones et al. (2008) RXTE Liu et al. (2008) RXTE Chang et al. (2007) TAOS Zhang et al. (2008) MMT Bianco et al. (2009) Bickerton et al. (2008) Roques et al. (2008) 12 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 ) ) 2 2 - - g g e e d d ( ( ) ) r r > > ( ( N N g g o o l l 0 0 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.1 1 1 radius (km) radius (km) 10 10 100 100 Fig. 2. -- Cumulative KBO size distribution as a function of KBO radius for objects located between 30 and 60 AU. The results from our FGS survey are shown in red and are presented in three different ways: (i) The cross is derived from our detection and represents the KBO surface density around the ecliptic (averaged over −5◦ < b < 5◦) and is shown with 1 σ error bars. The cross is plotted at r = 250 m, which is roughly the peak of our detection probability (see Supplementary Information Section 6 for details). (ii) The upper and lower red curves correspond to our upper and lower 95% confidence level which were derived without assuming any size distribution. (iii) The region bounded by the two straight red lines falls within 1σ of our best estimate for the power-law size distribution index, i.e. q = 3.9 ± 0.3, which was calculated for low ecliptic latitudes (b < 5◦). These lines are anchored to the observed surface density at r = 45 km. For comparison, the green (long-dashed) line is the observed size distribution of large KBOs (i.e., r > 45 km), which has q = 4.5, extrapolated as a single power-law to small sizes. The blue (short-dashed) line is a double power-law with q = 3.5 (collisional cascade of strength dominated bodies) for KBOs with radii less than 45 km and q = 4.5 above. The cyan (dot-dashed) line corresponds to q = 3.0 (collisional cascade of strengthless rubble piles) for KBOs below 45 km in size. All distributions are normalized to N (> r) = 5.4 deg−2 at a radius of 45 km (25). In addition, 95% upper limits from various surveys are shown in black. Note, a power-law index of 3.9 was used for calculating the cumulative KBO number density from the RXTE observations. -- 10 -- Supplementary Information 1 The FGS data set There are three FGS on board of HST . Each FGS consists of four photomultipliers (PMTs). Nominal HST operation uses two FGS for guiding, with each FGS observing its own guide star. The photon counts recorded by each FGS are therefore different, but global instru- mental artifacts and Observatory level transients will display in both FGS and can therefore be identified and removed. Observations of the inclination distribution of large KBOs find that about 75% have an inclination angle i . 20◦ (29; 30; 31). We therefore divide the FGS observations into a low ecliptic latitude (b < 20◦) and a high ecliptic latitude (b > 20◦) sample. The high-ecliptic latitude observations (b > 20◦) provide an excellent control sample. 2 FGS Guide Stars The FGS guide stars span a broad range of magnitudes and spectral types. The signal-to- noise ratio, S/N, in a 1/40 s data bin depends on the magnitude of the star. Its distribution is shown in Supplementary Figure 3. The angular sizes of guide stars were derived by fitting the 2MASS (32) JHK and USNO- B1 BR (33) photometry with a black-body spectrum. Supplementary Figure 4 shows the angular radii distribution of the guide stars. About 66% of the stars in our data set subtend angular sizes less than 0.5 of the Fresnel scale at a distance of 40 AU. The diffraction pattern that is produced by a sub-km sized KBO occulting an extended background star is smoothed over the finite stellar disk. This effect becomes clearly noticeable for stars that subtend sizes larger than about 0.5 of a Fresnel scales (34; 35) and it reduces the detectability of occul- tation events around such stars. The effect of finite angular radii of the guide stars on the detection efficiency of our survey is taken into account (see Detection Efficency section 5 for details). 3 Detection Algorithm Our detection algorithm performs a template search with theoretical light curves and uses a χ2 fitting procedure to identify occultation candidates. Our survey is most likely to detect KBO occultation events caused by objects that are 200-500 m in radius given the signal- to-noise of our data and for a power-law index of the KBO size distribution, q, between 3 and 4.5. Occultation events in this size range are in the Fraunhofer regime. The theoretical -- 11 -- light curves for our search algorithm are therefore calculated in the Fraunhofer regime. Our templates are calculated for various impact parameters assuming a point source background star and are integrated over the 400-700 nm wavelength range of the FGS observations. For a given impact parameter between the KBO and the star, our theoretical light curves have three free parameters that we fit for. The first is the mean number of photon counts, which is the normalization of the light curve. The second is the amplitude of the occultation, which is proportional to the size of the KBO, and the third is the width of the occultation, which is independent of the object size, and is determined by the ratio of the Fresnel scale to the relative speed between HST and the KBO perpendicular to the line of sight. This relative speed is determined by the combination of HST 's velocity around the Earth, Earth's veloc- ity around the Sun and the velocity of the KBO itself. We use this information to restrict the parameter space for the template widths in our search such that we are sensitive to KBOs located at the distance of the Kuiper belt between 30 AU and 60 AU. 4 Detection Criterion and Significance Estimates The significance of occultation candidates can be measured by their ∆χ2 which is defined here as the difference between the χ2 calculated for the best fit of a flat light curve, which corresponds to no event, and the χ2 of the best fit template. Occultation events have large ∆χ2, since they are poorly fit by a constant. Cosmic ray events, which give rise to one very large photon count reading in a 40 Hz interval, can also result in a large ∆χ2 but the fit of the occultation template is very poor. We examined all flagged events for which the tem- plate fit of the diffraction pattern was better than 15 σ. About a handful of false-positives where flagged by our detection algorithm that have a value of ∆χ2 comparable to or larger than the occultation event. However, in all cases these false-positives were caused by a 1 Hz jitter due to the displacement of the guide star from its null position. The occultation event itself did not show any such jitter. To determine the ∆χ2 detection criterion for our search algorithm and to estimate the probability that detected events are due to random noise we use the bootstrap technique (36). Specifically, from a given FGS time series of length N we randomly selected N points with repetitions and created 'artificial' time series from it. We analyzed these 'artificial' data sets using the same search algorithm that we applied to the actual FGS data. This technique creates random time series with noise properties identical to those of the actual data, but it will lose any correlated noise. Therefore, this technique is justified if there is no correlated noise in the data sets. To look for correlated noise we calculated the auto-correlation function, with lags between 0 to 1 s. Most of the data sets are free of statistical significant correlated noise. The ∼ 12% of the data sets that did show correlated noise exceeding 4 σ, which was often due to slopes (e.g., long-term variability) in the data sets, were excluded from the bootstrap analysis. The FGS data set consists of observations of many different stars with magnitudes rang- -- 12 -- ing from 9 to 14. The number of photon counts and signal-to-noise properties vary therefore from observation to observation (see Supplementary Figure 3 for the signal-to-noise ratio distribution of the FGS observations). Our ∆χ2 calculation accounts for the Poisson noise of the data. Therefore, the probability that occultation candidates are due to random noise can be characterized by a single value of ∆χ2 for all observations, irrespective of the mean photon count of a given observation provided that the noise properties across all observa- tions are well characterized by a Poisson distribution. In reality, the noise properties are different from observation to observation; especially non-Poisson tails in the photon counts distribution will give rise to slightly different ∆χ2 distributions. Therefore, ideally, we would determine a unique detection criterion for each individual data set. However, this would re- quire to simulate each data set, which contains about an hour of observations in a single HST orbit, over the entire length of our survey (∼ 12, 000 star hours). This is not feasible due to the enormous computational resources that would be required, i.e. simulating a single one hour data set over the entire survey length requires about 5 CPU days, which corresponds to ∼ 60, 000 CPU days for the entire FGS survey. Instead, we perform the bootstrap sim- ulation over all the FGS data sets together, where each individual data set was simulated about a 100 times, which required about ∼ 500 CPU days in total. This way we estimate the typical ∆χ2 value that corresponds to having less than one false-positive detection over the ∼ 12, 000 star hours of low ecliptic observations. For all occultation candidates that exceed this detection threshold, we determined their statistical significance, i.e. the probability that they are due to random noise, by extensive bootstrap simulations of the individual data sets (Supplementary Figure 7). 5 Detection Efficency The ability to detect an occultation event of a given size KBO depends on the impact parameter of the KBO, the duration of the event, the angular size of the star and the signal- to-noise ratio of the data. We determined the detection efficiency of our survey by recovering synthetic events that we planted into the observed photometric time series by multiplying the actual FGS data with theoretical light curves of KBO occultation events. The synthetic events correspond to KBO sizes ranging from 130 m < r < 650 m, they have impact pa- rameters from 0 to 5.5 Fresnel scales and a relative velocity distribution that is identical to that of the actual FGS observations. To account for the finite angular sizes of the stars we generated light curve templates with stellar angular radii of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1 Fresnel scales distributed as shown in Supplementary Figure 4. The modified light curves with the synthetic events were analyzed using the same search algorithm that we used to analyze the FGS data. The detection efficency of our survey was calculated using the angu- lar size distribution of the FGS guide stars assuming a distance of 40 AU. We normalize our detection efficency for a given size KBO, η(r) , to 1 for an effective detection cross section with a radius of one Fresnel scale. -- 13 -- The detection efficiency of our survey is ∼ 0.05 (∼ 0.6) for objects with r = 200 m (r = 500 m) located at 40 AU. Note that this value for the detection efficency already ac- counts for the angular radii distribution of the guide stars (e.g., for comparison, stars that subtend angular radii less than 0.5 of the Fresnel scale result in a detection efficency of ∼ 0.08 [∼ 0.8] for objects with r = 200 m [r = 500 m].). 6 Calculating the KBO Surface Density The number of occultation events is given by Nevents ≃ −2vrelF Z rmax rmin Z b −b η(r) ∆t ∆b dN(r, b) dr dbdr (1) where vrel = 23 km/s is the typical relative velocity between the KBO and the observer, b is the ecliptic latitude, ∆t/∆b is the time observed per degree in ecliptic latitude (see Supplementary Figure 5) and F = 1.3 km is the Fresnel scale. The number density of KBOs is both a function of ecliptic latitude and the KBO radius, r. Here we assume that the KBO latitude distribution, f (b), is independent of size and we take the distribution provided in Elliot et al. (2005) (31). We further assume that the KBO size distribution follows a power law. It can therefore be written as N(r, b) = n0 × r−q+1 × f (b) where n0 is the normalization factor for the cumulative surface density of KBOs. Substituting for dN(r, b)/dr in equation 1 and solving for n0 we have n0 ≃ Nevents 2vrelF (q − 1)R rmax rmin η(r)r−q drR b −b f(b) ∆t ∆b db . (2) Evaluating equation 2 yields a cumulative KBO surface density averaged over the ecliptic (b < 5◦) of N(r > 250 m) ≃ 2.1 × 107 deg−2 (3) We assumed q = 4 when evaluating the integral over r. We note however that the value for the cumulative KBO surface density at r = 250 m only depends weakly on the exact choice for q [e.g. N(r > 250 m) only ranges from 2.3 × 107 deg−2 to 2.1 × 107 deg−2 for values of q between 3 and 4.5]. We quote our results as the KBO surface density of objects larger than 250 m in radius since this is roughly the size of KBOs, which our survey is most likely to detect given our detection efficency and a power-law size distribution with q = 3 − 4.5. The implied surface density for KBOs with radii larger than 250 m is 7.7 × 106 deg−2 at b = 5.5◦, which is the ecliptic latitude of the RXTE observations of Scorpius X-1, and it is 4.4 × 106 deg−2 for 8◦ < b < 20◦. -- 14 -- s r u o h r a t s 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 S/N Fig. 3. -- Distribution of star hours as a function of the mean signal-to-noise ratio, S/N , in a 40 Hz bin for the 12,000 hours of low ecliptic latitude observations (b < 20◦) in the analyzed FGS data set. -- 15 -- s r u o h r a t s 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 angular radius (Fresnel scale) Fig. 4. -- Distribution of star hours as a function of angular radii of the guide stars. The angular radii are given as fraction of the Fresnel scale both which are calculated at 40 AU. -- 16 -- s r u o h r a t s 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 -18 -14 -10 -6 -2 2 b (deg) 6 10 14 18 Fig. 5. -- Distribution of star hours as a function of ecliptic latitude, b, for the 12,000 hours of low ecliptic latitude observations (b < 20◦) in the analyzed FGS data set. -- 17 -- ) 1 - g e d ( y t i l i b a b o r p n o i t c e t e d 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 -18 -14 -10 -6 -2 2 b (deg) 6 10 14 18 Fig. 6. -- Detection probability as a function of ecliptic latitude, b, for the 12,000 hours of low ecliptic latitude observations (b < 20◦) of the analyzed FGS data set. The detection probability was calculated from the ecliptic latitude distribution of FGS guide stars shown in Supplementary Figure 5 and the KBO ecliptic latitude distribution from Elliot et al. (2005)(31). Note, we assumed that the KBO ecliptic latitude distribution is symmetric about the ecliptic and ignored the small ∼ 1.6◦ inclination of the Kuiper belt plane(31) relative to the ecliptic. For our survey, there is ∼ 60% probability that KBO occultations will occur inside the low-inclination core region (b < 4◦) of the Kuiper belt. The probability for KBO occultations outside the core region is roughly uniform for 4◦ < b < 20◦ and about 40% of all KBO occultations will occur outside the low-inclination core region. The detection of one object at 14◦ is therefore consistent with the latitude distribution of our observations and that of KBOs. -- 18 -- 10 1 0.1 0.01 ) 2 χ ∆ > ( p - f N 50 54 58 62 ∆χ2 66 70 74 Fig. 7. -- Cumulative number of false-positives, Nf −p, as a function of ∆χ2. These false-positives were obtained from bootstrap simulations using data from ∼ 28 minutes of FGS observations that were acquired over one HST orbit, in which we discovered the occultation candidate. The original time series was 32 minutes long and we removed the last 4 minutes that showed a significant increasing trend in the number of photon counts. We removed the occultation event itself (which occurred about 2.3 minutes before the start of the trend) and simulated 2.5 × 106 star hours, which is 206 times larger than our low ecliptic latitude observations. This calculation required ∼ 1400 CPU days of computing power. The number of false-positives, Nf −p, was normalized to 12,000 star hours, which corresponds to the length of the entire low ecliptic latitude observations. In the entire bootstrap analysis we obtained 4 events with a ∆χ2 ≥ 67.3. This implies a probability of 8 × 10−7 that events like the occultation candidate with ∆χ2 = 67.3 are caused by random statistical fluctuations within the original 32 minutes data set that contained the event and a probability of ∼ 4/206 ∼ 2% that events like the occultation candidate are caused by random statistical fluctuations over the entire low ecliptic latitude observations. The analysis of our high ecliptic latitude control sample, which is twice as large, did not yield any events that were comparable in significance to the occultation candidate. -- 19 -- REFERENCES (29) Jewitt, D., Luu, J. & Chen, J. The Mauna Kea-Cerro-Tololo (MKCT) Kuiper Belt and Centaur Survey. AJ 112, 1225 -- 1238 September 1996. (30) Brown, M. E. The Inclination Distribution of the Kuiper Belt. AJ 121, 2804 -- 2814 May 2001. (31) Elliot, J. L., Kern, S. D., Clancy, K. B., Gulbis, A. A. S., Millis, R. L. et al. The Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. II. Dynamical Classification, the Kuiper Belt Plane, and the Core Population. AJ 129, 1117 -- 1162 February 2005. (32) Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M. D., Schneider, S. et al. The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). AJ 131, 1163 -- 1183 February 2006. (33) Monet, D. G., Levine, S. E., Canzian, B., Ables, H. D., Bird, A. R. et al. The USNO-B Catalog. AJ 125, 984 -- 993 February 2003. (34) Roques, F. & Moncuquet, M. A Detection Method for Small Kuiper Belt Objects: The Search for Stellar Occultations. Icarus 147, 530 -- 544 October 2000. (35) Nihei, T. C., Lehner, M. J., Bianco, F. B., King, S.-K., Giammarco, J. M. et al. Detectability of Occultations of Stars by Objects in the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud. AJ 134, 1596 -- 1612 October 2007. (36) Efron, B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and other resampling plans. Society for Industrial Mathematics (1982). This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
1601.03713	1	1601	2016-01-14T20:11:05	Surface Albedo and Spectral Variability of Ceres	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Previous observations suggested that Ceres has active but possibly sporadic water outgassing, and possibly varying spectral characteristics in a time scale of months. We used all available data of Ceres collected in the past three decades from the ground and the Hubble Space Telescope, and the newly acquired images by Dawn Framing Camera to search for spectral and albedo variability on Ceres, in both a global scale and local regions, particularly the bright spots inside Occator crater, over time scales of a few months to decades. Our analysis has placed an upper limit on the possible temporal albedo variation on Ceres. Sporadic water vapor venting, or any possibly ongoing activity on Ceres, is not significant enough to change the albedo or the area of the bright features in Occator crater by >15%, or the global albedo by >3% over various time scales that we searched. Recently reported spectral slope variations can be explained by changing Sun-Ceres-Earth geometry. The active area on Ceres is less than 1 km$^2$, too small to cause global albedo and spectral variations detectable in our data. Impact ejecta due to impacting projectiles of tens of meters in size like those known to cause observable changes to the surface albedo on Asteroid Scheila cannot cause detectable albedo change on Ceres due to its relatively large size and strong gravity. The water vapor activity on Ceres is independent of Ceres' heliocentric distance, rulling out the possibility of comet-like sublimation process as a possible mechanism driving the activity.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Surface Albedo and Spectral Variability of Ceres Jian-Yang Li (李荐扬)1, Vishnu Reddy1, Andreas Nathues2, Lucille Le Corre1, Matthew R. M. Izawa3,4, Edward A. Cloutis3, Mark V. Sykes1, Uri Carsenty5, Julie C. Castillo-Rogez6, Martin Hoffmann2, Ralf Jaumann5, Katrin Krohn5, Stefano Mottola5, Thomas H. Prettyman1, Michael Schaefer2, Paul Schenk7, Stefan E. Schröder5, David A. Williams8, David E. Smith9, Maria T. Zuber10, Alexander S. Konopliv6, Ryan S. Park6, Carol A. Raymond6, Christopher T. Russell11 … 1 Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E. Ft. Lowell Rd., Suite 106, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA 2 Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, 37077 Göttingen, Germany 3 University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Canada 4 Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada 5 German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Planetary Research, Berlin, Germany 6 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 7 Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX 77058, USA 8 School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA 9 Solar System Exploration Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 10 Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 11 Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 1 Abstract Previous observations suggested that Ceres has active but possibly sporadic water outgassing, and possibly varying spectral characteristics in a time scale of months. We used all available data of Ceres collected in the past three decades from the ground and the Hubble Space Telescope, and the newly acquired images by Dawn Framing Camera to search for spectral and albedo variability on Ceres, in both a global scale and local regions, particularly the bright spots inside Occator crater, over time scales of a few months to decades. Our analysis has placed an upper limit on the possible temporal albedo variation on Ceres. Sporadic water vapor venting, or any possibly ongoing activity on Ceres, is not significant enough to change the albedo or the area of the bright features in Occator crater by >15%, or the global albedo by >3% over various time scales that we searched. Recently reported spectral slope variations can be explained by changing Sun-Ceres-Earth geometry. The active area on Ceres is less than 1 km2, too small to cause global albedo and spectral variations detectable in our data. Impact ejecta due to impacting projectiles of tens of meters in size like those known to cause observable changes to the surface albedo on Asteroid Scheila cannot cause detectable albedo change on Ceres due to its relatively large size and strong gravity. The water vapor activity on Ceres is independent of Ceres’ heliocentric distance, ruling out the possibility of comet-like sublimation process as a possible mechanism driving the activity. Keywords: minor planets, asteroids: individual (1 Ceres) – methods: observational – techniques: photometric – technique: imaging processing – space vehicles 2 1. Introduction Observations of dwarf planet Ceres by NASA’s Dawn spacecraft have revealed a surface peppered with bright spots associated with impact craters (Nathues et al. 2015). The bright spots are prominent albedo features on the otherwise uniform surface of Ceres in albedo and color. Compositional analysis reveals that these bright spots are likely made up of a mixture of water ice, salts, and dark background material, suggesting a briny subsurface source. Bright spots within impact craters Dantu (125 km) and Occator (92 km) have been linked to intermittent and localized water vapor sources observed by the Herschel Space Observatory in 2011-2013 (Küppers et al. 2014), and therefore possibly related to the sublimation activity. Recent ground- based observations of Ceres also suggested short-term global spectral variability that was attributed to changing amount of water ice on the surface (Perna et al. 2015). These observations suggest a possibly changing surface caused by water outgassing on time scales of decades to months. We searched for evidence of surface albedo and spectral variations that might be evidence for ongoing activity by comparing various historical datasets and the most recent Dawn Framing Camera (FC) data collected during the approach to Ceres. Our search covered three different time frames: long-term in decades; mid-term in years, and short-term in months. 2. Analysis 2.1 Full-disk spectral variability The spectral data archived in the Planetary Data System Small Bodies Node from four epochs (Vilas et al. 1998, Bus & Binzel 2003, Lazzaro et al. 2006), from Perna et al. (2015) in two epochs, and from recent ground-based observations (Reddy et al. 2015a) span over nearly three decades, suitable for searching for long-term spectral variability of Ceres (Fig. 1a). The 3 spectra of Ceres from various datasets all show a nearly linear shape between 0.53 and 0.85 µm, with increasing spectral slopes with solar phase angle, and absorptions <0.54 µm and >0.9 µm. Therefore we fit linear slopes to all spectra between 0.54 and 0.85 µm to quantify the spectral shape variation. Fig. 1b suggests that the variations in slope are ascribable to variations in phase angle, except for the Dawn RC2 observations at 44º phase angle (described below), possibly indicating that the approximate linear relationship between spectral slope and phase angle stops somewhere between 20º and 40º phase angle. Dawn FC observed Ceres for at least one full rotation of Ceres of 9.075 hours Chamberlain et al. 2007) in three separate epochs in February and April 2015 during the approach. These three observations are named Rotational Characterization (RC1, RC2, and RC3, see Table 1). The disk of Ceres did not fill the field of view of the FC during the RCs. Image calibration and spectral cube computation have been performed according to Reddy et al. (2012a) and Nathues et al. (2014). The time difference between RC1 and RC2 is one week and between RC2 and RC3 ten weeks, enabling us to explore short-term (days/weeks/months) global spectral variability on Ceres. To minimize dependence on the effect of the absolute calibration of the instrument, we calculated the relative spectra in each of the three RCs. The phase angle of RC3 is about 8º. Based on the linear fit to the spectral slope with respect to phase angle (Fig. 1b), the spectral slope of Ceres at the RC3 phase angle is near zero. Therefore, the ratio spectra of RC1 and RC2 to RC3 should remove the effect of the uncertain absolute radiometric calibration of Dawn FC (Schröder et al. 2013a, 2014), and approximate the spectra of Ceres collected at RC1 (17º phase angle) and RC2 (44º). The spectral slope from RC1 is consistent with the overall trend with phase angle in the three RCs. We therefore based our spectral slope analysis of Dawn FC data on these relative spectra (Fig. 1a). 4 2.2 Global photometric variability To measure global variations in the albedo of Ceres over a time scale of years, we used previously published HST data collected in 2003 and 2004 with the Advanced Camera for Survey (ACS) High Resolution Channel (HRC) through the broadband F555W filter (Li et al. 2006), supplemented by observations taken with the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) UVIS channel through the broadband filter F555W in 2014 (GO-13503, PI: B.E. Schmidt). The WFC3/UVIS F555W has a similar combined throughput as the ACS/HRC F555W filter in 2014. We scaled the total flux of Ceres to a phase angle of 6º by a linear fit to the disk-integrated phase function measured from the HST ACS/HRC data, which span a small range of phase angles from 5.4º to 7.7º, and phasing each flux measurement to the rotation of Ceres based on the rotational period of Ceres, which has an accuracy of 7 ms per rotation (Chamberlain et al. 2007). The total reflected flux of Ceres measured through the three datasets agrees with each other within 3%, well within the absolute photometric calibration uncertainties of the two instruments. 2.3 Occator bright spots The HST/ACS/HRC data and Dawn FC data are separated by 12 years, and are both spatially resolved, suitable for searching for albedo changes in local scales on Ceres in a medium timeframe of years. We focus on the Occator crater because the bright spots inside this crater are undoubtedly the most prominent features on Ceres, and possibly related to the water vapor activity (Nathues et al. 2015). Comparison of absolute feature brightness between different datasets is extremely difficult, due primarily to the vastly different optical characteristics and absolute calibrations between HST and FC. Our approach is to compare the Occator bright spots 5 with a reference region, for which we chose the Haulani crater (32 km diameter), because it is relatively easy to identify in HST images. The underlying assumptions for our comparative approach is that the reflectances of Occator bright spots and Haulani crater did not change simultaneously, and this is justified by the unchanging disk-integrated brightness of Ceres over the same time period (§2.2). We used RC1 images and RC3-equator images (Table 1) in this study. Note that Haulani crater is in fact the brightest feature on Ceres in HST images (Li et al. 2006, Thomas et al. 2005), brighter than Occator crater (Fig. 2). The present study seeks an answer to the question: Did the brightness of Occator crater change since the previous HST observations, or are the different relative reflectance values of Haulani and Occator an observing artifact from comparing the HST and Dawn datasets? 2.3.1 Photometric modeling Precise photometric comparisons require corrections for different illumination and viewing geometries, which further rely on photometric models of the whole surface of Ceres and the bright spots. We separately modeled the photometric properties of Occator bright spots and the global average of Ceres based on RC3 clear filter (effective wavelength 730 nm, FWHM 370 nm) data at 1.3 km/pixel with the Hapke model (Hapke 2012), following the procedure outlined in Li et al. (2013). The shape model derived from Dawn FC data collected during approach is used, coupled with the spacecraft trajectory and pointing data in NASA’s Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility SPICE kernels, to calculate the local illumination and scattering geometry. Some details of the photometric modeling are available in Li et al. (2015). Due to the limited observing geometry available in our data, especially the lack of data at small phase angles to constrain the opposition effect, some modeled photometric parameters for 6 Occator bright spots, such as the single-scattering albedo (SSA) and geometric albedo, highly depend on the assumptions in the modeling as well as the particular form of photometric models used. The Bond albedo, on the other hand, is much less model-dependent because it is dominated by the light scattered towards moderate range of phase angles (30º-90º) that is well sampled in the data. Despite relatively large uncertainties in some modeled parameters, photometric models show that the bright spots have significantly different properties from the average Ceres. The SSA of the brightest part of Occator bright spots is between 0.67 and 0.80, comparing to the average SSA of Ceres of 0.094-0.11. Occator bright spots have a Bond albedo of 0.24±0.01 through the Dawn FC clear filter, comparing to 0.034±0.001 for Ceres average. Since SSA and Bond albedo measure the scattered light towards all directions, they are more fundamental physical properties than geometric albedo, which is often poorly constrained due to the lack of data at low phase angle. Hence we compared Occator bright spots with other solar system objects in terms of their Bond albedos. The Bond albedo of Occator bright spots is higher than the average Vesta and most asteroids in the main belt, but is comparable to or slightly lower than the bright material on Vesta (Li et al. 2012) (Fig. 3). Compared to icy moons in the outer solar system, Occator brightest spot is comparable or brighter than Ganymede and Callisto, but darker than Europa and most large Saturnian satellites whose surfaces are dominated by water ice. Therefore, Occator bright spots are unlikely pure water ice, but either admixtures of water ice, salts, and perhaps other bright minerals with darker background material. The bright spots appear to scatter light more isotropically, with a single-term Henyey- Greenstein parameter of -0.1±0.05, than the average Ceres surface (-0.35±0.05), which is consistent with most asteroids (C- and S-types). The phase function of a surface is affected by, 7 among other factors, grain transparency, shape, defects, impurities, etc. The relatively less backscattering phase function of the bright spots is consistent with higher albedo and stronger multiple scattering, and possibly more transparent particles. The Hapke model roughness parameter for the bright spots is between 40º and 50º, significantly higher than the average Ceres of 20º±3º. Relatively higher roughness suggests more loosely packed regolith particles that cast substantial shadows compared to the average Ceres, consistent with a geologically young regolith that has not been substantially processed (Schröder et al. 2013b). 2.3.2 Albedo variability of Occator bright spots For comparisons of the brightness between Occator bright spots and Haulani crater in different datasets, the effects of different resolution and the vastly different point-spread function (PSF) have to be accounted for. From the radiometrically calibrated images of RC1 and RC3, first, we downsampled them to the pixel scale of HST images (30 km/pixel), then convolve the images with a PSF of HST ACS/HRC at F555W filter generated by the TinyTIM (Krist et al. 2011). We then measured the intensity value of the brightest pixel that contains the Occator crater and Haulani crater from both HST images and the processed Dawn FC images. After correcting for the varying local illumination and viewing angles for both features in all measurements using the best-fit photometric parameters of Ceres surface, we plot the brightness measurements with respect to local solar time for both features and compare their relative brightness (Fig. 2b). The effect of subpixel shift in the downsampling process is negligible. Ideally, after the correction for local illumination and viewing angle with the best-fit photometric model, the brightness of both features should be independent of local solar time. The residual variations with local solar time as shown in Fig. 2b suggest that the photometric 8 model does not completely remove the dependence on (varying) local scattering geometry over a Ceres day for both features. The slightly different illumination and observing geometries in different datasets result in different trends as they rotate over the disk of Ceres. However, note that the variations after correction in Fig. 2b are at the 4% level, within the performance expectation of photometric correction in general. Fig. 2b shows that the reflectance contrast between the Occator region and the Haulani region remains unchanged within 2% in HST, and Dawn FC RC1 and RC3 images. The reason that Occator crater appeared to be darker than Haulani region in HST images, as well as in the processed RC1 and RC3 images (Fig. 2b), is due to the large footprint of HST pixels and the wide PSF (80% energy encircled at 5 pixel; Maybhate et al. 2010) of the ACS/HRC camera, together washing out the high contrast of the relatively small bright spots (<4 km) with respect to the background. The bright Haulani crater region, together with the bright rays outside of the crater, are >50 km across. Fig. 2b also shows that no brightness variation was observed in Occator between the RC1 and RC3 observations over the span of eleven weeks. We will continue monitoring the brightness of the bright spots as well as all possible active regions on Ceres throughout the Dawn mission at resolutions down to 35 m/pixel to search for any possible change. 3. Discussions To interpret the putative albedo variability on Ceres we calculated the area in the Occator bright spots and how much albedo change is needed to create a measurable change in global albedo of Ceres. Our albedo variation investigation is limited by the HST pixel scale of 30 km. The Occator bright spots have a combined area of about 95 km2, accounting for 11% of the HST 9 pixel footprint. Therefore our study suggests that any brightness change within the bright spots, or change in their total area, is smaller than 15%. Given the water production rate of 2×1026 molecules s-1 for Ceres (Küppers et al. 2014), assuming a Bond albedo of 0.034, and a thermal emissivity of 0.9, pure water ice sublimation model (Cowan & A’Hearn 1979) suggests an active area of 0.2 km2 for a slow rotator case where the surface is at instantaneous thermal equilibrium with local solar insolation at the latitude of Occator (~20º). The low thermal inertia of Ceres of <15 J m-2 s-0.5 K-1 (Chamberlain et al. 2009) justifies the slow rotator assumption. This active area corresponds to 0.2% of the combined surface area of the Occator crater spots, or 0.5% of the central core bright spot. The active area within the bright spots is too small to produce measurable albedo changes at 30 km pixel size. The impact ejecta observed on main belt asteroid (596) Scheila during the impact in 2010 (Ishiguro et al. 2011) produced an average brightness change of ~5% over 10,000 km2 area. If we use the crater size scaling law (Housen & Schmid 1983) with an exponent parameter of 0.7, based on an escape velocity of 55 m s-1 for Scheila (as calculated by Ishiguro et al. 2011) and 0.5 km s-1 for Ceres, the same impact on Ceres could produce an ejecta field that is 104 smaller, or ~1 km2. Scaling with albedo and size shows that such an impact is still too small to produce any albedo change on Ceres detectable by our analysis. Based on Bodewits et al. (2011) consideration, the projectile on Scheila had a size of 35-60 m and a relative velocity of ~5.3 km s-1; and the impact frequency is once every 103 years. Therefore, if the outgassing on Ceres were triggered by sporadic impact events similar to that considered for Scheila, then such events would not directly produce albedo changes with ejecta near the impact site detectable here. Perna et al. (2015) suggested that Ceres displays short-term (months) visible spectral variability, and attributed it to “extended resurfacing processes such as cryovolcanism or 10 cometary activity”. Our interpretation of the ground-based visible wavelength spectral data shows an increasing spectral slope with increasing phase angle (Fig. 1). Observation geometry has been shown to change slope and band depth in reflectance spectra of small bodies (Sanchez et al. 2012), including Vesta (Reddy et al. 2012, Li et al. 2013). Hence our observations do not support the results reported in that study. The current intermittent and weak water sublimation does not cause albedo and color variations on the surface of Ceres detectable in our data. Our analysis of the heliocentric dependence of activity on Ceres (Fig. 4) shows no correlation between the two. This is an indication that whatever mechanism responsible for water vapor outgassing on Ceres is at least not completely driven by solar insolation as for comets. The presence of a network of cracks (Reddy et al. 2015b) inside craters with bright spots such as Occator hints at an internal source that is responsible for the transportation of volatiles from their subsurface sources. We thank the Dawn operations team for the development, cruise, orbital insertion, and operations of the Dawn spacecraft at Ceres. The Framing Camera project is financially supported by the Max Planck Society and the German Space Agency, DLR. Li is supported by a subcontract from the University of California, Los Angeles under the NASA Contract #NNM05AA86 Dawn Discovery Mission. This research made use of Astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013), and Matplotlib (Hunter 2007) Figure Captions 11 Figure 1. a) The visible spectra of Ceres taken at increasing phase angles (marked at the left of each spectrum) from bottom to top (vertically shifted for clarity). From bottom to top: Geo: Modeled geometric albedo spectrum from ground-based photometric observations (Reddy et al. 2015); P01, P02, P03: Perna et al. (2015) spectra on December 18 and 19, 2012; V87: Vilas et al. (1998) spectrum in 1987; P04, P05, P06: Perna et al. (2015) spectra on January 18, 19, 20, 2013; SOS: S2OS3 (Lazzaro et al. 2006); RC1: Dawn RC1; SII: SMASS II (Bus & Binzel 2003); V92: Vilas et al. (1998) spectrum in 1992; and RC2: Dawn RC2. b) The linear spectral slopes of Ceres’ spectra between 0.54 and 0.85 µm. The colors of symbols correspond to the colors in panel a. The large error bar for the red symbol at 0.8º phase angle, corresponding to P02 spectrum, is due to the much higher noise in the spectrum compared to others. The black dashed line is a linear fit to the spectral slope with respect to phase angle, not including the slope measured from Dawn RC2 at 44º phase angle. The spectral slope of Ceres increases nearly linearly from 0º to 25º phase angle. Figure 2. a) Images of Haulani crater (left column) and Occator crater (right column) from HST taken in December 2003 and January 2004 (top row), Dawn RC1 images taken on February 4, 2015 (second row), Dawn RC3 images taken on May 5, 2015 (third row), and the downsampled and convolved images of Dawn RC3 images (bottom row). The to craters in all images are marked by the dashed-line circles, and their names are noted in the RC3 images. The HST images shown in the top row are drizzled (Fruchter & Sosey 2009) to 0”.015 per pixel scale from the original 0”.025. The pixel scale at Ceres shown in the top row is 18 km for HST images, for RC1 images 13.7 km, for RC3 images 1.32 km, and for processed RC3 images 30 km. SC and SS are the longitude and latitude of, respectively, sub-spacecraft/HST and sub-solar points; and 12 ph is the phase angle. b) The photometrically corrected reflectance of Haulani region (red) and Occator region (blue) in three datasets. The reflectance are measured from original HST images, and Dawn RC1 and RC3 images that are convolved with HST/ACS/HRC PSF and downsampled to HST image resolution. The I/F are corrected to a common, arbitrary geometry of 3.15º incidence angle, 3º emission angle, and 6.15º phase angle, close to the phase angle of HST images. The horizontal lines are the averages of the I/F for both features to show the contrast between the two regions in various cases. The contrast between Haulani region and Occator region at 30 km scale is 5-7%, and remain unchanged within 3% between HST, RC1, and RC3. Figure 3. Comparisons of Bond albedos between Ceres (red square), Occator bright spots (blue square), and other solar system objects (green circles). The Bond albedos of icy satellites are from a list complied by Verbiscer et al. (2012); and those of comets (9P, 19P, 81P, and 103P), asteroids (asteroid numbers 4, 243, 253, 433, 951, 2867, and 26143), the Moon, and the Martian satellites are from a list compiled by Li et al. (2013). Figure 4. The positions of Ceres in its orbit during the previous searches of water vapor. The solid ellipse is Ceres’ orbit with the Sun at the center, and “Peri” marks the perihelion of Ceres. The filled symbols mark the detection of water vapor (circles, by Herschel) or OH (triangles, by IUE), and the open symbols are non-detection. The directions of the triangles mark the direction of off-limb OH search, where upper triangles are off northern limb, and down triangles are off southern limb. The S and N are summer solstice for southern hemisphere and northern hemisphere, respectively, based on the pole measurement from Dawn data. The blue shaded part of Ceres’ orbit is during Dawn’s planned stay from April 1st, 2015 to June 30th, 2016. No 13 obvious trend of water outgassing and orbital phase (perihelion/aphelion, seasons) is clearly identified. The outgassing appears to be intermittent and occurs at arbitrary orbital phases. 14 Table 1. Observation conditions extracted from the FC color data. Phase Average S/C distance Heliocentric Angle (deg) resolution (km) distance (AU) (km/pixel) 17.2 – 17.6 7.68 42.7 – 45.3 4.24 RC1 RC2 RC3 (Equatorial) 7.7 – 11.0 1.28 82,151 45,359 13,603 2.8529 2.8578 2.9051 15 References Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T.P., Tollerud, E.J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33 Bodewits, D., Kelley, M.S., Li, J.-Y., et al. 2011, ApJL, 773, L3 Bus, S. & Binzel, R.P. Small Main-belt Asteroid Spectroscopic Survey, Phase II. EAR-A-I0028- 4-SBN0001/SMASSII-V1.0. NASA Planetary Data System (2003) Chamberlain, M., Sykes, M.V., & Esquerdo, G.A. 2007, Icar, 188, 451 Chamberlain, M.A., Lovell, A.J., & Sykes, M.V. 2009, Icar, 202, 487 Cowan, J.J. & A’Hearn, M.F. 1979, The Moon and the Planets, 21, 155 De Sanctis, M.C., Ammannito, E., Raponi, A., et al. 2015, Nature, 528, 241 Fruchter, A. & Sosey, M. 2009. The Multidrizzle Handbook, Version 3.0, (Baltimore, STScI) Hapke, B. Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy, 2nd Ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK. Housen, K.R. & Schmidt, R.M. 1983, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 2485 Hunter, J.D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90 Ishiguro, M., Hanayama, H., Hasegawa, S., et al. 2011, Astrophys. J., 740, L11 Krist, J.E., Hook, R.N., Stoehr, F. 2011, Proc. of SPIE, 8127, 81270J-1 Lazzaro D. et al. Small Solar System Objects Spectroscopic Survey V1.0. EAR-A-I0052-8- S3OS2-V1.0. NASA Planetary Data System (2006) Li, J.-Y., McFadden, L.A., Parker, J.Wm., et al. 2006, Icar, 182, 143 Li, J.-Y., Mittlefehldt, D.W., Pieters, C.M., et al. 2012, LPICo, 1667, 6386 Li, J.-Y., Le Corre, L., Schröder, S.E., et al. 2013, Icar, 226, 1252 Li, J.-Y., Nathues, A., Le Corre, L., et al. 2015, EPSC2015-383 16 Maybhate, A. et al. 2010, ACS Instrument Handbook, Version 10.0 (Baltimore: STScI) Nathues, A., Hoffmann, M., Cloutis, E.A., et al. 2014, Icar, 239, 222 Nathues, A., Hoffmann, M., Schaefer, M., et al. 2015, Nature, 528, 237 Küppers, M., O’Rourke, L., Bocklelée-Morvan, D., et al. 2014, Nature, 505, 525 Perna, D., Kaňuchová, Z., Ieva, S., et al. 2015, Astron. Astrophys., 575, L1 Reddy, V., Nathues, A., Le Corre, L., et al. 2012a, Science, 336, 700 Reddy, V., Sanchez, J.A., Nathues, A., et al. 2012b, Icar, 217, 153 Reddy, V., Li, J.-Y., Gary, B.L., et al. 2015a, Icar, 260, 332 Reddy, V., Nathues, A., Le Corre, L., et al. 2015b, MetSoc 2015, 5161 Sanchez, J.A., Reddy, V., Nathues, A., et al. 2012, Icar, 220, 36 Schröder, S.E., Maue, T., Gutiérrez Marqués, P., et al. 2013a, Icar, 226, 1304 Schröder, S.E., Mottola, S., Keller, H.U. 2013b, Planet. Space Sci., 85, 198 Schröder, S.E., Mottola, S., Matz, K.-D., et al. 2014, Icar, 234, 99 Thomas, P.C., Parker, J.Wm., et al. 2005, Nature, 437, 224 Verbiscer, A.J., Helfenstein, P., & Buratti, B.J. 2012, The Science of Solar System Ices, 47 Vilas, F. et al. Vilas Asteroid Spectra V1.1, EAR-A-3-RDR-VILAS-ASTEROID-SPECTRA- V1.1. NASA Planetary Data System (1998) 17
1512.05440	2	1512	2016-02-26T10:03:37	ALMA Observations of a Gap and a Ring in the Protoplanetary Disk around TW Hya	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We report the first detection of a gap and a ring in 336 GHz dust continuum emission from the protoplanetary disk around TW Hya, using the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA). The gap and ring are located at around 25 and 41 au from the central star, respectively, and are associated with the CO snow line at ~30 au. The gap has a radial width of less than 15 au and a mass deficit of more than 23%, taking into account that the observations are limited to an angular resolution of ~15 au. In addition, the 13CO and C18O J = 3 - 2 lines show a decrement in CO line emission throughout the disk, down to ~10 au, indicating a freeze-out of gas-phase CO onto grain surfaces and possible subsequent surface reactions to form larger molecules. The observed gap could be caused by gravitational interaction between the disk gas and a planet with a mass less than super-Neptune (2M_{Neptune}), or could be the result of the destruction of large dust aggregates due to the sintering of CO ice.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version June 13, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 ALMA OBSERVATIONS OF A GAP AND A RING IN THE PROTOPLANETARY DISK AROUND TW HYA Hideko Nomura1,, Takashi Tsukagoshi2,, Ryohei Kawabe3,4,5, Daiki Ishimoto6,1, Satoshi Okuzumi1, Takayuki Muto7, Kazuhiro D. Kanagawa8, Shigeru Ida9, Catherine Walsh10, T.J. Millar11 and Xue-Ning Bai12 Draft version June 13, 2018 ABSTRACT We report the first detection of a gap and a ring in 336GHz dust continuum emission from the proto- planetary disk around TW Hya, using the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA). The gap and ring are located at around 25 and 41 AU from the central star, respectively, and are associated with the CO snow line at ∼ 30AU. The gap has a radial width of less than 15AU and a mass deficit of more than 23%, taking into account that the observations are limited to an angular resolution of ∼ 15AU. In addition, the 13CO and C18O J = 3 − 2 lines show a decrement in CO line emission throughout the disk, down to ∼ 10AU, indicating a freeze-out of gas-phase CO onto grain surfaces and possible subsequent surface reactions to form larger molecules. The observed gap could be caused by gravitational interaction between the disk gas and a planet with a mass less than super-Neptune (2MNeptune), or could be the result of the destruction of large dust aggregates due to the sintering of CO ice. Subject headings: protoplanetary disks -- stars: individual (TW Hya) -- submillimeter: planetary systems -- planet-disk interactions -- molecular processes 1. INTRODUCTION The physical structures and chemical compositions of gas, dust, and ice in protoplanetary disks control the for- mation process of planets and the composition of their cores and atmospheres. The ALMA long baseline cam- paign has detected gaps and rings in dust continuum emission from the circumstellar disk around a very young star (∼ 0.1 − 1Myrs), HL Tau (ALMA Partnership et al. 2015). The origin of this complex disk structure in such a young object remains under debate. In this Letter, we present ALMA observations of the relatively old (∼ 3 − 10Myrs) gas-rich disk around the young Sun-like star, TW Hya (∼ 0.8M⊙), which show [email protected] 1 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Insti- tute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo, 152-8551, Japan 2 College of Science, Ibaraki University, Mito, Ibaraki 310- 8512, Japan 3 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 4 SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Stud- ies), 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 5 Department of Astronomy, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 6 Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan 7 Division of Liberal Arts, Kogakuin University, 1-24-2 Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 163-8677, Japan 8 Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0819, Japan 9 Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan 10 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P. O. Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 11 Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK 12 Institute for Theory Smithsonian Center MS-51, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA for Astrophysics, and Computation, Harvard- 60 Garden Street, ∗ These authors contributed equally to this work. the presence of a gap and a ring associated with the CO snow line. TW Hya's proximity (54±6 pc) makes it an ideal source to study formation environment of a planetary system (e.g., Andrews et al. 2012). The disk is old compared with other gas-rich protoplane- tary disks whose lifetime is typically ∼ 3Myrs (e.g., Hern´andez et al. 2007). Nevertheless, the disk gas mass is > 0.05M⊙ inferred through HD line observations with Herschel (Bergin et al. 2013). In exoplanetary systems giant planets have been discovered at/beyond Neptune- orbit around Sun-like stars by direct imaging obser- vations using Subaru/HiCIAO (Thalmann et al. 2009; Kuzuhara et al. 2013). Thus, planets are able to form even at large distances within disk lifetime by, for exam- ple, scattering of planetary cores (Kikuchi et al. 2014). Given that planet-disk interaction is key for planet or- bital evolution and planet population synthesis (e.g., Kley & Nelson 2012; Ida et al. 2013), understanding gap formation in protoplanetary disks helps to gain insight into the early evolution of our own Solar System, as well as the observed diversity of exoplanetary systems. 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION TW Hya was observed with ALMA in Band 7 on 20-21 May, 2015 with 40 antennas in Cycle 2 with a uv-coverage of 22-580 kλ (PI: D. Ishimoto). The spectral windows were centered at 329.295GHz (SPW1), 330.552GHz (SPW0), 340.211GHz (SPW2), and 342.846GHz (SPW3), covering C18O J = 3 − 2, 13CO J = 3 − 2, CN N = 3 − 2 and CS J = 7 − 6. The channel spacing was δν =30.52kHz and the band- width was 117.188MHz except for SPW 2 in which a channel spacing of δν =15.26kHz and a bandwidth of 58.594MHz were used. The quasar J1058+0133 was ob- served as a bandpass calibrator while the nearby quasar J1037-2934 was used for phase and gain calibration. The mean flux density of J1037-2934 was 0.58Jy during the observation period. The visibility data were reduced and calibrated using 2 Nomura et al. CASA, version 4.3.1 and 4.4.0. The visibility data was reduced for each SPW separately, and the continuum vis- ibilities were extracted by averaging the line-free chan- nels in all SPWs. The corrected visibilities were imaged using the CLEAN algorithm with Briggs weighting with a robust parameter of 0 after calibration of the bandpass, gain in amplitude and phase, and absolute flux scaling, and then flagging for aberrant data. In addition to the usual CLEAN imaging, we performed self-calibration of the continuum emission to improve the sensitivity and image quality. The obtained solution table of the self- calibration for the continuum emission was applied to the visibilities of the lines. The self-calibration signifi- cantly improved the sensitivity of the continuum image by one order of magnitude from 2.6 to 0.23mJy. In ad- dition, the continuum visibility data with deprojected baselines longer than 200kλ was extracted in order to enhance small scale structure around the gap. The high spatial resolution data was analysed in a similar way, but imaged using the CLEAN algorithm with uniform weighting. Also, the ALMA archived data of N2H+ J = 4 − 3 line at 372.672GHz were reanalysed in a sim- ilar way to compare with that obtained by our observa- tions. The re-analysed data is consistent with that in Qi et al. (2013). For the N2H+ line data, the synthe- sized beam and the 1σ RMS noise level in 0.1 km s−1 were 0."44×0."41 (P.A. = 12.4◦) and 31.2mJy beam−1. 3. RESULTS 3.1. Dust Continuum Emission The observed dust continuum emission maps at 336GHz are plotted for both the full data (Fig. 1a) and high spatial frequencies only (> 200kλ, Fig. 1b). The synthesized beam and RMS noise were 0."37×0."31 (∼ 20AU, P.A. = 55.7◦) and 0.23mJy beam−1. The total and peak flux density were 1.41Jy and 0.15Jy beam−1 with a SN (signal-to-noise) ratio of 705 and 652, re- spectively. The results agree well with the previous SMA observations (Andrews et al. 2012) and ALMA ob- servations (Hogerheijde et al. 2015) with lower spatial resolution and sensitivity. The synthesized beam and RMS for the data at high spatial resolution data only were 0."32×0."26 (∼ 15AU, P.A. = 54.5◦) and 0.49mJy beam−1. As shown by the black line in Fig. 2a, the dust con- tinuum emission of the full data has a shallow dip in the radial profile of the surface brightness obtained by deprojecting the observed image data assuming an incli- nation angle of 7◦ and a position angle of −30◦ (Qi et al. 2008). By imaging the data at high spatial frequen- cies only (> 200kλ), we identify a gap and a ring at around 25AU and 41AU, respectively (Fig. 1b and gray line in Fig. 2a). The uv-coverage of the full data set (from 22 to 580 kλ) is sufficiently high and indeed vital for this analysis. The continuum visibility profile as a function of the deprojected baseline length is plotted in Fig. 3. Our result is consistent with the recent ALMA observations with higher spatial resolution and sensitiv- ity (Zhang et al. 2016). Since the high spatial frequency data misses flux of spatially extended structure, the to- tal flux is lower than that of the full data by an order of magnitude. Artificial structure appears at R > 70AU in the high spatial frequency data probably due to a fail- Fig. 1. -- 336GHz dust continuum map imaged using (A) all spa- tial frequency data and (B) only high spatial frequency (> 200kλ) data, (C) 13CO J = 3 − 2 and (D) C18O J = 3 − 2 integrated line emission maps. Emission less than 5σ-noise-level were masked. The synthesized beam sizes are shown in the bottom left corner of each panel. ure to subtract the side lobe pattern of the synthesized beam. Its intensity is less than the 2σ-noise-level and the structure is masked in Fig. 2a. The location of the gap is similar to that of the axisymmetric depression in polarized intensity of near-infrared scattered light imag- ing of dust grains recently found by Subaru/HiCIAO and Gemini/GPI (Akiyama et al. 2015; Rapson et al. 2016). 3.2. Dust Surface Density and Gap Parameters We extract the radial dust surface density distribution (Fig. 2b), using the deprojected data of the dust contin- uum emission and the equation, Id,ν = Bν(Td)[1 − exp(−τd,ν)], (1) where Id,ν is the observed intensity of the dust contin- uum emission at the frequency ν, Bν(Td) is the Planck function at the dust temperature, Td. The optical depth, τd,ν, is defined as τd,ν = κνΣdust, where Σdust is the dust surface density and the dust opacity, κν , is set as κν = 3.4 cm2 g−1. We adopt Td = 22K(R/10AU)−0.3, where R is the disk radius, by fitting the model result in Andrews et al. (2012) and assume a uniform temperature distribution in the vertical direction. The derived dust optical depth is shown in Fig. 2c. We note that the de- rived dust surface density distribution is consistent with that derived from SMA observations of dust continuum emission and model calculations (Andrews et al. 2012). Also, the assumed dust temperature is consistent with the color temperature obtained from the spectral index of continuum emission across the observed four basebands between 329GHz and 343GHz (Fig. 2d) in the optically thick regions (≤ 30AU, Fig. 2c). To estimate the gap width, ∆gap, and depth, (Σ0 − Σ)/Σ0, where Σ0 and Σ are the basic surface density and the surface density with the gap at the gap center, A Gap and a ring in the TW Hya disk 3 102 101 ] 1 - m a e b y J m [ ν I 100 (A) 0 10 ] 2 - m c g [ 10-1 d Σ 150 100 50 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 10 20 30 40 τ 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 3.0 (C) 10 20 30 40 α 2.0 (B) -2 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Radius [AU] (D) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1.0 Radius [AU] 0 = 1.1 × 103R−1.5 Fig. 2. -- Radial distributions of (A) intensity of 336GHz dust continuum emission, (B) dust surface density, (C) optical depth and (D) spectral index between 329GHz and 343GHz. Gray line in Figure (A) shows the data of only high spatial frequency with its Gaussian fit (green line). Red crosses in (A)-(C) are derived from high spatial frequency data recovered by the full spatial frequency data at the gap. The inserts show a close-up of the region around the gap. the intensity at the gap, Igap (red crosses in Fig. 2a), is derived by completing the missing flux of the high spatial frequency data, I high gap (gray line in Fig. 2a), with the full spatial frequency data, I full (black line in Fig. 2a). The intensity profile across the gap was obtained as follows; (i) fit the high frequency data without the gap using a power-law profile of I high AU mJy beam−1, (ii) fit the gap region in the high frequency data using a single Gaussian profile of ∆Igap = I high gap = 7.7 exp(−(RAU − 24.7AU)2/{2(5.9AU)2}) mJy beam−1 (whose FWHM is 13.9±1.0AU and depth is 7.7±0.5mJy) (green line in Fig. 2a) and (iii) obtain the intensity at the gap as Igap = I full − ∆Igap, where I full is the intensity of the full data. In this fitting, we adopted the edges of the gap at R = 9 − 13AU (inner edge) and 39 − 43 AU (outer edge) so that ∆Igap is overlaid to I full smoothly. The op- tical depth at the gap is derived using Igap and Eq.(1), and then the dust surface density at the gap is derived using the same method mentioned above (red crosses in Fig. 2b). The resulting gap width is ∆gap ∼ 15AU and the depth is (Σ0 − Σ)/Σ0 ∼ 0.23. We note that our esti- mate of the gap width is limited by the angular resolution of the high spatial frequency data. The pattern of the gap and ring is also affected by residual artefacts due to the cut-off at 200kλ, which introduces uncertainties in the location of the gap center, and the width and depth of the gap. − I high 0 3.3. CO Isotopologue Line Emission The observed 13CO and C18O J = 3 − 2 rotational line emission maps are plotted in Figs. 1c and 1d. The result- ing synthesized beam and the 1σ RMS noise level in 0.03 km s−1 width-channels were 0."41×0."33 (P.A. = 53.4◦), 12.0mJy beam−1 (13CO) and 0."41×0."33 (P.A. = 53.8◦), 13.4 mJy beam−1 (C18O). The integrated inten- sity maps were created by integrating from 1.18 to 4.30 km s−1 (13CO) and from 1.48 to 4.15 km s−1 (C18O). The resultant noise levels of the map were 8.4 mJy beam−1 km s−1 (13CO) and 6.5 mJy beam−1 km s−1 (C18O). The deprojected radial profiles of the integrated line emission of the 13CO and C18O following subtraction of the dust ] y J [ l a e R 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 −0.2 0 ] y J [ y r a n g a m i I 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 −0.01 −0.02 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 deprojected uv distance [k-lambda] 100 200 300 400 500 600 deprojec ed uv dis ance [k-lambda] Fig. 3. -- Real (top) and imaginary (bottom) parts of the az- imuthally averaged continuum visibility profile as a function of the deprojected baseline length. continuum emission are plotted in Fig. 4a. The signal- to-noise ratio is not sufficiently high to analyse the high spatial resolution data only. 3.4. CO Column Density We obtain the CO radial column density distribution, using the deprojected data of the 13CO and C18O line observations (Fig. 4d). The CO column density, NCO, is derived from the integrated line emission of the C18O J = 3 − 2 (Turner 1991; Rybicki & Lightman 1979), as- suming the abundance ratios of CO :13CO=67 : 1 and 13CO : C18O=7 : 1 (Qi et al. 2011). The optical depth of the C18O line emission, τC18O,v (Fig. 4c), is obtained from the observed line intensity as follows. We assume that the CO line emitting region is mainly in the sur- face layer, while the dust continuum emitting region is near the midplane. Thus, the deprojected intensity of the CO line emission plus dust continuum emission can be approximately derived from the following equation by simply assuming three zones in the vertical direction of the disk, IC18O+cont,v = Bν(Tg)(1 − e−τC18O,v /2) +Bν(Td)(1 − e−τd,ν )e−τC18O,v /2 (2) +Bν(Tg)(1 − e−τC18O,v /2)e−τd,ν −τC18O,v /2, where Tg is the gas temperature of the CO line emitting region and Td is the dust temperature near the midplane. The data continuum-subtracted data, IC18O+cont,v −Id,ν, together with Eq.(1) is used for the analysis. Since the observed line ratio of R IC18O,vdv/ R I13CO,vdv is larger than 1/7 (Fig. 4b), the 13CO line is optically thick. Therefore, we adopt the brightness temperature at the peak of the 13CO line (Fig. 5) as the gas tem- perature, Tg. Also, we adopt a dust temperature of Td = 22K(R/10AU)−0.3 and the dust optical depth, τd,ν, is derived from the dust continuum observations (Fig. 2c). We note that in the analysis we simply assume that the gas temperature is uniform in the vertical direc- tion, and the gas temperature of the C18O line emitting region is the same as that of the 13CO line emitting re- gion, although it could be lower in reality. In addition, C18O could be depleted due to the effect of isotopologue- dependent photodissociation, and NCO/NC18O is possi- 4 Nomura et al. ) O 10-1 8 1 C ( e v a τ 10-2 (C) ] 2 - m c [ ) 1018 O C N ( 1017 (D) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Radius [AU] ( R H 2 g / d ) 1 0.1 -3 10 ) d / g O C R ( -4 10 (E) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Radius [AU] Fig. 4. -- Radial distributions of (A) integrated line emission of 13CO (red line) and C18O (blue line) J = 3 − 2, (B) line ratio of C18O to 13CO, (C) averaged optical depth of the C18O line, (D) CO column density and (E) CO gas-to-dust surface density ratio. H2 gas-to-dust ratio is also marked for a reference by simply assuming the abundance ratio of CO to H2 of 6 × 10−5. All data are smoothed to a beam size of 0."45×0."45. bly higher than 440 (Miotello et al. 2014). The CO col- umn density will be underestimated due to these effects. 3.5. CO Gas-to-Dust Surface Density Ratio Using the obtained CO column density and dust sur- face density (Figs. 4d and 2b), we derive the CO gas-to- dust surface density ratio (Fig. 4e). If we convert it to the H2 surface density, assuming an abundance ratio of CO to H2 of 6 × 10−5 (Qi et al. 2011), the estimated H2 gas mass is orders of magnitude lower than that predicted from the observations of the HD line emission by the Herschel Space Observatory (Bergin et al. 2013). The resulting H2 gas-to-dust surface density ratio (∼ 0.1 − 1) is about two orders of magnitude lower than the typi- cal interstellar value of ∼100, which suggests strong CO depletion throughout the disk down to ∼ 10AU. The CO gas-to-dust surface density ratio increases be- yond a radius of ∼ 40AU since the dust surface den- sity drops dramatically in this region. It could be due to drift of pebbles from the outer disk toward the cen- tral star (e.g, Takeuchi et al. 2005; Andrews et al. 2012; Walsh et al. 2014b). 4. DISCUSSIONS 4.1. Origin of the Gap and Ring in the Dust Continuum Emission The gap and ring resemble those in the HL Tau sys- tem, recently found by the ALMA long baseline cam- paign (ALMA Partnership et al. 2015). Our result shows that gaps and rings in the (sub)millimeter dust con- tinuum can exist, not only in relatively young disks (0.1 − 1Myrs) but also in relatively old disks (3 − 10Myrs). One possible mechanism to open a gap is the gravitational interaction between a planet and the gas (e.g., Lin & Papaloizou 1979; Goldreich & Tremaine 1980; Fung et al. 2014). Such an interaction may also produce the spiral density waves recently found in optical and near-infrared scattered light imaging of dust grains in protoplanetary disks (e.g., Muto et al. 2012). Accord- ing to recent theoretical analyses of gap structure around a planet (Kanagawa et al. 2015a,b, 2016), the depth and width of the gap are controlled by the planetary mass, the turbulent viscosity and the gas temperature. The shape of the gap is strongly influenced by angular mo- mentum transfer via turbulent viscosity and/or instabil- ity caused by a steep pressure gradient at the edges of a gap. The observed gap has an apparent width and depth of ∆gap ∼ 15AU and (Σ0 − Σ)/Σ0 ∼ 0.23, respectively. This is too shallow and too wide compared with that predicted by theory. However, the observations are lim- ited to an angular resolution of ∼ 15AU, and the depth and width could be deeper and narrower in reality. For instance, if we assume that the gap depth times the gap width retains the value derived from the observations, it is possible for the gap to have a width and depth of ∆gap ∼6AU and (Σ0 − Σ)/Σ0 ∼ 0.58, which is similar to the GPI result (Rapson et al. 2016). Such a gap could be opened by a super-Neptune-mass planet, depending on parameters of the disk, such as the turbulent viscosity (Kanagawa et al. 2015a,b, 2016). If the gap in the larger dust grains is deeper than that in the gas, the planet could be lighter than super-Neptune mass. We note that a planet of even a few Earth masses, although it can- not open a gap in the gas, can open a gap in the dust distribution if a certain amount of pebble-sized particles, whose motion is not perfectly coupled to that of gas, are scattered by the planet and/or the spiral density waves excited by the planet (Paardekooper & Mellema 2006; Muto & Inutsuka 2009). Another possible mechanism to form a gap and an as- sociated ring in dust continuum emission is the micro- scopic process of sintering of CO ice on dust aggregates (Okuzumi et al. 2016; Sirono 2011). The gaps and rings observed in the younger and more luminous HL Tau sys- tem could be explained by the sintering of various molec- ular ices in the disk at their distinct snow line locations (Okuzumi et al. 2016). Although our observations in- dicate that the CO depleted region is located down to ∼ 10AU in the TW Hya system, model calculations of the temperature in the disk suggest the CO snow line is located at ∼ 30AU. Sintering is a process that renders an aggregate less sticky (Sirono 2011). Just outside the CO snow line where sintering occurs, large aggregates be- come easily destroyed into small fragments by collisions and their radial drift motion by the above-mentioned mechanism slows down. Thus dust grains are stuck just outside the CO snow line, and a bright ring and a dark lane inside the ring is formed in the dust continuum emis- sion. If another sintering region is formed inside the dark lane by, for example, CH4 sintering, the region between the bright CO and CH4 sintering regions would look like a gap. According to model calculations (Okuzumi et al. 2016), the CH4 sintering region is located at ∼ 10AU in the TW Hya disk. 4.2. CO Gas Depletion inside the CO Snow Line A Gap and a ring in the TW Hya disk 5 40 30 ] K 20 [ ) k a e p ( B T 10 9 8 7 10 13 CO w/ cont CN w/ cont CN w/o cont + N2H w/ cont + w/o cont N2H 30 50 70 90 Radius [AU] Fig. 5. -- Radial distributions of the observed brightness temper- ature at the peak of 13CO J = 3 − 2 (red) and N2H+ J = 4 − 3 (green) lines. The dust temperature at the midplane (dot-dashed gray line) and the brightness temperature of CN N = 3−2 (purple) line are also plotted for comparison. Dashed lines show the data subtracted by the dust continuum emission for N2H+ and CN. All data are smoothed to a beam size of 0."45×0."45. From the CO line observations, we find a very low column density of CO compared with dust throughout the disk down to a radius of about 10AU. This CO de- pletion could indicate a general absence of H2 gas com- pared with dust. However, the Herschel HD observations (Bergin et al. 2013) indicates that it is more likely that it is due to CO freeze-out on grains with the possibil- ity that subsequent grain surface reactions form larger molecules even inside the CO snow line (Favre et al. 2013; Williams & Best 2014). The CO column density derived from our observations, NCO ∼ 1018cm−2, can be explained by detailed model calculations using a chem- ical network which includes freeze-out of molecules on grains and grain-surface reactions (Aikawa et al. 2015). The model calculations show the CO depletion will pro- ceed inside the CO snow line due to the sink effect: con- version of CO to less volatile species on grain surface. In the case of TW Hya, it could occur on a timescale shorter than the disk lifetime, depending on the amount of small grains. See Aikawa et al. (2015) for more de- tailed discussions including the effect on other species. The CO depletion spread over the disk is inconsistent with the prediction by the previous ALMA N2H+ ob- servations that depletion would be localized beyond the CO snow line (Qi et al. 2013). This could be because the N2H+ line emission traces the disk surface and not the CO depleted region. Fig. 5 shows the brightness temperature at the peak of the 13CO J = 3 − 2 line obtained by our obser- vations and the N2H+ J = 4 − 3 line at 372.672GHz obtained by the ALMA archived data (2011.0.00340.S). Since the 13CO line is optically thick, the brightness tem- perature at the peak of the line emission represents the gas temperature of the line emitting region. If LTE is applicable, the N2H+ brightness temperature is higher than the gas temperature of the 13CO line emitting re- gion at the disk radius of ∼ 40AU, and higher than the dust temperature near the midplane down to ∼ 15AU (Fig. 5). If the N2H+ line is optically thin, the gas tem- perature of the line emitting region is higher than the brightness temperature. Therefore, the N2H+ line should come from the surface layer of the disk. Model calcula- tions also predict that N2H+ exists in the disk surface for the model with (sub)micron-sized grains, similar to radical species abundant in the disk surface, such as CN and C2H (e.g., Walsh et al. 2010; Aikawa et al. 2015). Our results (Fig. 5) and the SMA observations of C2H (Kastner et al. 2015) show that the radial intensity pro- files of these species are similar. They have peaks around the disk radius of 40AU beyond which the dust surface density drops. The result suggests that in order to trace the CO depleted region, the C18O line may be more ro- bust than the N2H+ line. In the CO depleted region complex organic molecules would be produced via grain surface reactions since hydrogen attachment to pro- duce methanol and more (e.g., Watanabe & Kouchi 2008; Walsh et al. 2014a). Methyl cyanide, which has recently been detected from a proto- planetary disk for the first time by ALMA ( Oberg et al. 2015), could be formed through such grain surface reac- tions. complex species to CO is thought We would like to thank the referee for his/her com- ments which improved our paper. We are also grate- ful to Sean Andrews and Joel Kastner for their fruit- ful comments. This paper makes use of the follow- ing ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#2013.1.01397.S and ADS/JAO.ALMA#2011.0.00340.S. ALMA is a partner- ship of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), NSC and ASIAA (Taiwan) and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. This work is partially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, 23103005, 25108004, 25400229 and 15H03646. T.T. was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant No. 23103004. C.W. is sup- ported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Re- search (program number 639.041.335). Astrophysics at QUB is supported by a grant from the STFC. Facility: ALMA. Aikawa, Y., Furuya, K., Nomura, H., & Qi, C. 2015, ApJ, 807, 120 Akiyama, E., Muto, T., Kusakabe, N. et al. 2015, ApJ, 802, L17 ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C. L., P´erez, L. M. et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, L3 Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M. et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 162 Bergin, E. A., Cleeves, L. I., Gorti, U. et al. 2013, Nature, 493, 644 Favre, C., Cleeves, L. I., Bergin, E. A., Qi, C., & Blake, G. A. 2013, ApJ, 776, L38 Fung, J., Shi, J.-M., & Chiang, E. 2014, ApJ, 782, 88 Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1980, ApJ, 241, 425 REFERENCES 6 Nomura et al. Hern´andez, J., Hartmann, L., Megeath, T., et al. 2007, ApJ, 662, Okuzumi, S., Momose, M., Sirono, S.-i., Kobayashi, H., & 1067 Hogerheijde, M. R., Bekkers, D., Pinilla, P., Salinas, V. N., Kama, M., Andrews, S. M., Qi, C., & Wilner, D. J. 2016, A&A, 589, A99 Ida, S., Lin, D. N. C., & Nagasawa, M. 2013, ApJ, 775, 42 Kanagawa, K. D., Muto, T., Tanaka, H., Tanigawa, T., Takeuchi, T., Tsukagoshi, T., & Momose, M. 2015a, ApJ, 806, L15 -- . 2016, PASJ, submitted Kanagawa, K. D., Tanaka, H., Muto, T., Tanigawa, T., & Takeuchi, T. 2015b, MNRAS, 448, 994 Kastner, J. H., Qi, C., Gorti, U., Hily-Blant, P., Oberg, K., Forveille, T., Andrews, S., & Wilner, D. 2015, ApJ, 806, 75 Kikuchi, A., Higuchi, A., & Ida, S. 2014, ApJ, 797, 1 Kley, W., & Nelson, R. P. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 211 Kuzuhara, M., Tamura, M., Kudo, T., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 11 Lin, D. N. C., & Papaloizou, J. 1979, MNRAS, 186, 799 Miotello, A., Bruderer, S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2014, A&A, 572, A96 Muto, T., & Inutsuka, S.-i. 2009, ApJ, 695, 1132 Muto, T., Grady, C. A., Hashimoto, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, L22 Oberg, K. I., Guzm´an, V. V., Furuya, K., Qi, C., Aikawa, Y., Andrews, S. M., Loomis, R., & Wilner, D. J. 2015, Nature, 520, 198 Tanaka, H. 2016, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/1510.03556) Paardekooper, S.-J., & Mellema, G. 2006, A&A, 453, 1129 Qi, C., D'Alessio, P., Oberg, K. I., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., Andrews, S. M., & Ayala, S. 2011, ApJ, 740, 84 Qi, C., Wilner, D. J., Aikawa, Y., Blake, G. A., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2008, ApJ, 681, 1396 Qi, C., Oberg, K. I., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2013, Science, 341, 630 Rapson, V. A., Kastner, J. H., Millar-Blanchaer, M. A., & Dong, R. 2015, ApJ, 815, L26 Rybicki, G. B., & Lightman, A. P. 1979, Radiative processes in astrophysics (New York: Wiley) Sirono, S.-i. 2011, ApJ, 735, 131 Takeuchi, T., Clarke, C. J., & Lin, D. N. C. 2005, ApJ, 627, 286 Thalmann, C., Carson, J., Janson, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 707, L123 Turner, B. E. 1991, ApJS, 76, 617 Walsh, C., Millar, T. J., & Nomura, H. 2010, ApJ, 722, 1607 Walsh, C., Millar, T. J., Nomura, H., Herbst, E., Widicus Weaver, S., Aikawa, Y., Laas, J. C., & Vasyunin, A. I. 2014a, A&A, 563, A33 Walsh, C., Juh´asz, A., Pinilla, P., et al. 2014b, ApJ, 791, L6 Watanabe, N., & Kouchi, A. 2008, Progress In Surface Science, 83, 439 Williams, J. P., & Best, W. M. J. 2014, ApJ, 788, 59 Zhang, K., Bergin, E. A., Blake, G. A., Cleeves, L. I., Hogerheijde, M., Salinas, V., & Schwarz, K. R. 2016, ApJ, 818, L16
1204.1468	1	1204	2012-04-06T12:44:48	Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Earth-like planets have viscoelastic mantles, whereas giant planets may have viscoelastic cores. The tidal dissipation of such solid regions, gravitationally perturbed by a companion body, highly depends on their rheology and on the tidal frequency. Therefore, modelling tidal interactions presents a high interest to provide constraints on planets' properties and to understand their history and their evolution, in our Solar System or in exoplanetary systems. We examine the equilibrium tide in the anelastic parts of a planet whatever the rheology, taking into account the presence of a fluid envelope of constant density. We show how to obtain the different Love numbers that describe its tidal deformation. Thus, we discuss how the tidal dissipation in solid parts depends on the planet's internal structure and rheology. Finally, we show how the results may be implemented to describe the dynamical evolution of planetary systems. The first manifestation of the tide is to distort the shape of the planet adiabatically along the line of centers. Then, the response potential of the body to the tidal potential defines the complex Love numbers whose real part corresponds to the purely adiabatic elastic deformation, while its imaginary part accounts for dissipation. This dissipation is responsible for the imaginary part of the disturbing function, which is implemented in the dynamical evolution equations, from which we derive the characteristic evolution times. The rate at which the system evolves depends on the physical properties of tidal dissipation, and specifically on how the shear modulus varies with tidal frequency, on the radius and also the rheological properties of the solid core. The quantification of the tidal dissipation in solid cores of giant planets reveals a possible high dissipation which may compete with dissipation in fluid layers.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy&Astrophysicsmanuscript no. RMZL12author3bisaccptarxiv November 5, 2018 © ESO 2018 Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets F. Remus1,2,3, S. Mathis3,4, J.-P. Zahn1, V. Lainey2 1 LUTH, Observatoire de Paris -- CNRS -- Universit´e Paris Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, F-92195 Meudon Cedex, France 2 IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris -- UMR 8028 du CNRS -- Universit´e Pierre et Marie Curie, 77 avenue Denfert-Rochereau, F-75014 3 Laboratoire AIM Paris-Saclay, CEA/DSM -- CNRS -- Universit´e Paris Diderot, IRFU/SAp Centre de Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur- Paris, France Yvette, France 4 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris -- CNRS -- Universit´e Paris Diderot -- Universit´e Pierre et Marie Curie, 5 place Jules Janssen, F-92195 Meudon, France e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received December 6, 2011; accepted February 24, 2012 ABSTRACT Context.Earth-like planets have viscoelastic mantles, whereas giant planets may have viscoelastic cores. The tidal dissipation of such solid regions, gravitationally perturbed by a companion body, highly depends on their rheology and on the tidal frequency. Therefore, modelling tidal interactions presents a high interest to provide constraints on planets' properties and to understand their history and their evolution, in our Solar Sytem or in exoplanetary systems. Aims. The purpose of this paper is to examine the equilibrium tide in the anelastic parts of a planet whatever the rheology, taking into account the presence of a fluid envelope of constant density. We show how to obtain the different Love numbers that describe its tidal deformation. Thus, we discuss how the tidal dissipation in solid parts depends on the planet's internal structure and rheology. Finally, we show how the results may be implemented to describe the dynamical evolution of planetary systems. Methods. We expand in Fourier series the tidal potential, exerted by a point mass companion, and express the dynamical equations in the orbital reference frame. The results are cast in the form of a complex disturbing function, which may be implemented directly in the equations governing the dynamical evolution of the system. Results. The first manifestation of the tide is to distort the shape of the planet adiabatically along the line of centers. Then, the response potential of the body to the tidal potential defines the complex Love numbers whose real part corresponds to the purely adiabatic elastic deformation, while its imaginary part accounts for dissipation. The tidal kinetic energy is dissipated into heat through anelastic friction, which is modeled here by the imaginary part of the complex shear modulus. This dissipation is responsible for the imaginary part of the disturbing function, which is implemented in the dynamical evolution equations, from which we derive the characteristic evolution times. Conclusions. The rate at which the system evolves depends on the physical properties of tidal dissipation, and specifically on how the shear modulus varies with tidal frequency, on the radius and also the rheological properties of the solid core. The quantification of the tidal dissipation in solid cores of giant planets reveals a possible high dissipation which may compete with dissipation in fluid layers. Key words. Planet-Star interactions -- Planets and satellites: general -- Planets and satellites: physical evolution -- Planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability 1. Introduction and general context Since 1995 a large number of extrasolar planets have been dis- covered, which display a wide diversity of physical parameters (Santos & et al., 2007). Quite naturally the question arose of their habitability, i.e. whether they could allow the development of life. Determining factors are the presence of liquid water and of a protective magnetic field, properties which are closely linked to the values of the rotational and orbital elements of the plane- tary systems. And these elements strongly depend on the action of tides. Once a planetary system is formed in a turbulent accre- tion disk, its fate is determined by the initial conditions and the mass ratio between planet and hosting star. Through tidal inter- action between components, the system evolves either to a stable state of minimum energy (where all spins are aligned, the orbits are circular and the rotation of each body is synchronized with Send offprint requests to: F. Remus the orbital motion) or the companion tends to spiral into the par- ent body. Indeed, by converting kinetic energy into heat through internal friction, tidal interactions modify the orbital and rota- tional properties of the components of the considered system, and thus their structure through internal heating. This mecha- nism depends sensitively on the internal structure and dynamics of the perturbed body. Recent studies have been carried out on tidal effects in fluid bod- ies like stars and envelopes of giant planets (Ogilvie & Lin 2004- 2007; Ogilvie 2009; Remus, Mathis & Zahn 2012). However the planetary solid regions, such as mantles of Earth-like plan- ets or rocky cores of giant planets, if present (e.g. Guillot 1999, Gaulme et al. 2011), may contribute likewise to tidal dissipa- tion. The first study of a tidally deformed elastic body was done by Lord Kelvin (1863) who applied it to an incompressible ho- mogeneous Earth. Further developments were made by Love (1911), who introduced a set of dimensionless numbers, the so- called Love numbers, to quantify the tidal perturbation. More 1 2 1 0 2 r p A 6 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 8 6 4 1 . 4 0 2 1 : v i X r a F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets recently Greff-Lefftz (2005) generalized these results in the case of a spheroidal rotating Earth. In the meanwhile Dermott (1979) considered a two-layer model and he studied the impact of a tidally deformed static fluid shell on the deformation of an elas- tic solid core. If the body is not perfectly elastic, i.e. if its internal structure is anelastic, the tidal deformation presents a lag with respect to the tension exerted by the tidal force, and causes the dissipation of kinetic energy. Several recent studies addressed this prob- lem of tidal dissipation using linear viscoelastic models. Peale & Cassen (1978) evaluated the tidal dissipation in the Moon considering various models of internal structure. Tobie et al. (2005) applied the Maxwell rheological model to evaluate the dissipation in Titan and Europa; Ross & Schubert (1986) com- pared three different linear models of viscoelasticity (Kelvin- Voigt, Maxwell, Standard Anelastic Solid), to which Henning et al. (2009) added the Burgers body. All these studies suscitate our interest in the tidal dissipation resulting from the anelastic deformation of the solid parts of a planet when perturbed by a companion. We shall study here the tidal dissipation in a planet which pos- sesses an anelastic core, made of a mix of ice and rock, sur- rounded by a fluid envelope, such as an ocean. The planet is part of a binary system where what we call the companion (or perturber) may be either the hosting star or a satellite of the planet. Due to the tide exerted by the companion, the core of the two-layer planet is deformed elastically, but because of the anelasticity of the material composing the core, this deformation is accompanied by a viscous dissipation that we evaluate what- ever the rheology. As an illustration, the results will be given for a Maxwell body. We then compare the value of the tidal dis- sipation in presence of a fluid envelope with that achieved by the fully solid planet, and we examine the dependence of the re- sults on the relative sizes of the core and the planet, the relative densities, and the viscoelastic parameters. In the last section, we establish the equations governing the dynamical evolution of the system, from which we deduce the caracteristic times of circu- larization, synchronization and spin alignments. 2. Elastic deformations of a solid body under tidal perturbation 2.1. Thesystem We consider a planet A of mass MA, consisting of a rocky (or icy) core and a fluid envelope, rotating at the angular velocity Ω and tidally perturbed by a second body of mass MB, assumed to be ponctual, moving around A on a Keplerian orbit, of semi-major axis a and eccentricity e, at the mean motion n. We locate any point M in space by its usual spherical coordinates (r, θ, ϕ) in a spin equatorial reference frame RE : {A, XE, YE, ZE} centered on body A and whose axis (A, ZE) has the direction of the rota- tion axis of A. The corresponding configuration is illustrated on Figure 1. In this section, we first assume that planet A has no fluid layer and its internal structure is supposed to be perfectly elastic. We will then denote by ρ its density and R its mean radius. 2.2. Thetidalpotential The planet is submitted to a tidal force, exerted by the perturber B, which derives from a perturbing time dependent potential 2 Fig. 1. Spherical coordinates system attached to the equatorial reference frame RE : {A, XE, YE, ZE} associated to body A. A point M is located by r ≡ (r, θ, ϕ); the point mass body B by rB ≡ (rB, θB, ϕB). l (θ, ϕ) in RE. U (r, t). Following Zahn (1966a-b) and generalizing it by using Kaula (1962), Lambeck (1980), Yoder (1995-1997) and Mathis & Le Poncin (2009) (hereafter MLP09) in the present case of a close binary system where spins are not aligned, the components are not synchronized with the orbital motion and where the or- bit is not circular, we expand the tidal potential U in spherical harmonics Ym Before we proceed, we need to define the Euler angles link the spin equatorial frame RE : {A, XE, YE, ZE} of that the central body A, on one hand, and the orbital frame RO : {A, XO, YO, ZO}, on the other hand, to the quasi-inertial frame RR : {A, XR, YR, ZR} whose axis ZR has the direction of the total angular momentum of the whole system. We need the three following Euler angles to locate the orbital reference frame RO with respect to RR: -- I, the inclination of the orbital plane of B; -- ω∗, the argument of the orbit pericenter; -- Ω∗, the longitude of the orbit ascending node. The equatorial reference frame RE is defined by three other Euler angles with respect to RR: -- ε, the obliquity of the rotation axis of A; -- Θ∗, the mean sideral angle defined by Ω = dΘ∗/dt; -- φ∗, the general precession angle. Refer to Figure 2 for an illustration of the relative position of these three reference frames and the associated angles. For con- venience, all the following developpements will be done in the spin equatorial frame RE of A (as it has been done in MLP09). All following results are derived from the Kaula's transform (Kaula 1962), used to explicitly express the whole generic multi- pole expansion in spherical harmonics of the perturbing potential U in terms of the Keplerian orbital elements of B in the equato- rial A-frame: F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets j m d2 j,m (ε) 2 2 2 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 (cid:16)cos ε 2(cid:17)4 2(cid:17)3(cid:16)sin ε 2(cid:17) −2(cid:16)cos ε √6(cid:16)cos ε 2(cid:17)2(cid:16)sin ε 2(cid:17)2 2(cid:17)2(cid:16)sin ε − 3(cid:16)cos ε (cid:16)cos ε 2(cid:17)4 2(cid:17)2 √6 cos ε(cid:16)cos ε 2(cid:17)(cid:16)sin ε 2(cid:17) 1 − 6(cid:16)cos ε 2(cid:17)2(cid:16)sin ε 2(cid:17)2 − Table 1. Values of the obliquity function d2 where j > m obtained from Eq. (8), (from MLP09). j,m (ε) in the case axis of A, as: a3 d2 (7) Um, j,p,q(r) = (−1)m s (2 − m)! (2 − j)! (2 + m)! (2 + j)! hd2 j,m(ε) F2, j,p(I) G2,p,q(e)i r2 , × G MB j,m(γ) is defined, for j > m, by: where G is the gravitational constant. The obliquity function d2 (2 + m)!(2 − m)!# 1 j,m(γ) = (−1) j−m" (2 + j)!(2 − j)! 2(cid:19)(cid:21) j−m 2(cid:19)(cid:21) j+m (cid:20)sin(cid:18) γ ×(cid:20)cos(cid:18) γ where Pα,β (x) are the Jacobi polynomials (cf. MLP09). The val- ues of these functions, for indices j < m, are deduced from d2 j,m(π + γ) = (−1)2− jd2 − j,m(γ) or from their symmetry proper- − j,−m(γ) = d2 j,m(γ) = (−1) j−md2 ties: d2 m, j(−γ); moreover, we have: d2 j,m(0) = δ j,m. Values are given in Table 1. We also define, the inclination function F2, j,p(I): P( j−m, j+m) 2− j (cos γ) , (8) l 2 F2, j,p(I) = (−1) j (2 + j)! 4 p! (2 − p)! 2(cid:19)(cid:21) j−2p+2 (cid:20)sin(cid:18) I ×(cid:20)cos(cid:18) I with the symmetry property: F2,− j,p(I) ="(−1)2− j (2 − j)! 2− j 2(cid:19)(cid:21) j+2p−2 × P( j+2p−2, j−2p+2) (2 + j)!# F2, j,p (I) . (cos I) , (9) (10) Values are given in Table 2. The eccentricity functions G2,p,q(e) are polynomial functions having eq for argument (see Kaula, 1962). Their values for the usual sets {2, p, q} are given in Table 3, knowing that in the case of weakly eccentric orbits, the summation over a small number of values of q is sufficient (q ∈ [ − 2, 2]). In the following, let us denote by I = [ − 2, 2] × [ − 2, 2] × [0, 2] × Z the set in which the quadruple {m, j, p, q} takes its values. If we simplify the expansion of the potential in the case where spins are aligned and perpendicular to the orbital plan, where obliquity ε and orbital inclination I are zero, Eq. (5) reduces to the expression of the potential given by Zahn (1977). The tidal force induces a displacement of each particule consti- tuting the planet, thus causing some deformations. In particular, the core's surface is deformed as described by the Love theory (Love 1911). 3 Fig. 2. Inertial reference (RR), orbital (RO), and equatorial (RE) rotating frames, and associated Eulers angles of orientation. 1 rl+1 B Pm l (cos θB) eimϕB = 1 al+1 (l − j)! (l + j)! 4π lXp=0Xq∈Z s 2l + 1 lXj=−l j,m(ε) Fl, j,p(I) Gl,p,q(e) eiiiΨl,m, j,p,q (1) ×dl where θB and ϕB are respectively the colatitude and the longitude of the point mass perturber B, and where the phase argument is given by: Ψl,m, j,p,q(t) = σl,m,p,q(n, Ω) t + τl,m, j,p,q (ω∗, Ω∗, φ∗) . (2) We have defined here the tidal frequency: σl,m,p,q(n, Ω) = (l − 2p + q) n − mΩ , and the phase τl,m, j,p,q: τl,m, j,p,q = (l − 2p)ω∗ + j(Ω∗ − φ∗) + (l − m) π 2 . (3) (4) We study here binary systems close enough for the tidal interac- tion to play a role, but we also consider that the companion is far (or small) enough to be treated as a point mass. We then are al- lowed to assume the quadrupolar approximation, where we only keep the first mode of the potential, l = 2: U(r, θ, ϕ, t) = Re  2Xm=−2 2Xj=−2 2Xp=0Xq∈Z Um, j,p,q(r) Pm 2 (cos θ) eiii Φ2,m, j,p,q(ϕ,t) (5) where Φ2,m, j,p,q(ϕ, t) = mϕ + Ψ2,m, j,p,q(t) (6) The functions Um, j,p,q (r, θ) may be expressed in terms of the Keplerian elements (the semi-major axis a of the orbit, its eccen- tricity e and its inclination I) and the obliquity ε of the rotation F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets j 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 p 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 3 2 F2, j,p (I) 8 sin2 I 3 4 sin2 I + 1 − 3 8 sin2 I 3 4 sin I (1 + cos I) − 3 2 sin I cos I − 3 4 sin I (1 − cos I) 4 (1 + cos I)2 2 sin2 I 4 (1 − cos I)2 3 3 3 Table 2. Values of the inclination function F2, j,p(I). Values for indices j < 0 can be deduced from Eq. (10), (from MLP09). p 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 q -2 -1 0 1 2 -2 -1 p 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 q 2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 G2,p,q(e) 7 17 0 − 1 2 e + · · · 1 − 5 2 e2 + · · · 2 e + · · · 2 e2 + · · · 4 e2 + · · · 2 e + · · · (cid:16)1 − e2(cid:17)−3/2 3 9 Table 3. Values of the eccentricity function G2,p,q(e), (from MLP09). 2.3. Dynamicalequationsforasolidbodyandtheirboundary conditions To describe the internal evolution of the main component A sub- mitted to the perturbations induced by the tidal potential pre- sented above, we use the Eulerian formalism (Dahlen et al. 1999). The system of equations, needed to follow the motion of a particule, is composed by the Eulerian momentum (11a) and mass (11b) conservation laws, and the Poisson equation (11c) satisfied by the potential Φ of self-gravitation: ρ ∂2s ∂t2 ∂s = ∇∇∇ · ¯¯σσσ + ρ∇∇∇ (Φ + U) , + ∇∇∇ · ρ Φ = −4πGρ , ∂t! = 0 , ∂ρ ∂t ∇∇∇2 (11a) (11b) (11c) where s designates the displacement vector and ¯¯σσσ is the stress tensor. We complete this system with the constitutive equation to link the stress exerted on the body to the resulting deformation. Assuming that tidal effect corresponds to a traction applied on the body, with no rotational contribution, the deformation tensor reduces to the strain tensor ¯¯ǫǫǫ: ¯¯ǫǫǫ = 1 2h∇∇∇s + (∇∇∇s)Ti , (11d) 4 T designates the transposed tensor of ¯¯hhh. We then get a where ¯¯hhh relation linking the stress tensor ¯¯σσσ to the strain tensor ¯¯ǫǫǫ that ac- counts for the rheology of the body, and that we represent by a function Frh: (11e) ¯¯σσσ = Frh(¯¯ǫǫǫ) . To solve this system (11), we need to apply boundary condi- tions to the five previous equations, assuming that there is no displacement (12a) neither attraction (12b) at the center of mass r = 0, the gravitational potential has to be continuous (12c) and the Lagrangian traction has to vanish (12d) at the surface r = R: sr=0 = 0 , (Φ + U)r=0 = 0 , [Φ]R+ R− = 0 , i.e. : = 0 . (cid:0)er · ¯¯σσσ(cid:1)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)r=R (12a) (12b) " ∂Φ ∂r + 4π G ρ sr#R+ R− = 0 , (12c) (12d) 2.4. Linearizationofthesystem Assuming that tidal effects, and thus the resulting elastic de- formation, are small amplitude perturbations to the hydrostatic equilbrium, we are allowed to linearize the system (11) and its boundary conditions (12). To do so, we expand a scalar quantity X as: X (r, θ, ϕ, t) = X0(r) + X′ (r, θ, ϕ, t) ; (13) X0 designates the spherically symmetrical profile of X, and X′ represents the perturbation due to the tidal potential. The dis- placement s and the tidal potential U are also considered as per- turbations. Thus, correct to first order in s, we obtain the fol- lowing form of system (11): ∂2s ∂t2 ρ0 = ∇∇∇ · ¯¯σσσ + ρ0 ∇∇∇(cid:0)Φ′ + U(cid:1) + ρ′ ∇∇∇Φ0 , ρ′ + ∇∇∇ · (ρ0 s) = 0 , Φ′ = −4πGρ′ , ¯¯σσσ = K − 2 3 µ! tr(cid:0)¯¯ǫǫǫ(cid:1) ¯¯III + 2µ¯¯ǫǫǫ , ∇∇∇2 (14a) (14b) (14c) (14d) where we made use of the Hooke's law (14d), which is a lin- ear constitutive law that governs elastic materials as long as the load does not exceed the material's elastic limit, in the case of an isotropic material (i.e.: whose properties are independent of direction in space). It means that strain is directly proportional to stress, through the bulk modulus K and the shear modulus µ. The reference state is drawn from an up-to-date planetary struc- ture model. It is governed by the following Poisson equation and the static momentum equation: ∇∇∇2 Φ0 = −4πGρ0 , ∇∇∇P0 = ρ0 ∇∇∇Φ0 , (15a) (15b) where we made use of the following convention for the gravity: g0 = ∇∇∇Φ0. 2.5. Analyticalsolutionsforanhomogeneousincompressible body To solve the linear system (14), we expand all scalar quan- tities in spherical harmonics Ym l (θ, ϕ). Moreover, as all vecto- rial quantities that intervene in Eqs. (14a-14b) are poloidal, we F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets may expand them in the basis of vectorial spherical harmonics l (θ, ϕ)i, where R refers to the radial part and S to the spheroidal part of a given vector (Rieutord 1987, Mathis & Zahn 2005): l (θ, ϕ), Sm hRm ∀(l, m) ∈ N × [ − l, l] ,  Rm l (θ, ϕ) = Ym Sm l (θ, ϕ) = ∇∇∇ShYm where ∇∇∇S designates the horizontal gradient: l (θ, ϕ) er , l (θ, ϕ)i , (16a) (16b) (17) ∇∇∇S = ∂ · ∂θ eθ + 1 sin θ ∂ · ∂ϕ eϕ . We introduce six radial functions ym (r) (Takeuchi & Saito 1972) to expand all quantities in spherical harmonics, at the quadrupolar approximation (l = 2): {1...6} -- the displacement: lutions, considering the expansion (18): ∀m ∈ [ − 2, 2], ym 1 (r) =Xj,p,q 2 (r) =Xj,p,q"2µ ym + 3 3 k2 k2 4 3 1 2 1 2 R2 + r2! R2 − R2 − r2! Um, j,p,q(r) , r R gs 8 r2 R gs 8 r2! R gs 8 πGρ2 k2 − ρ(1 + k2)#Um, j,p,q(r) , r2! Um, j,p,q(r) , R2 − (R2 − r2) Um, j,p,q(r) , r R gs 4 r R gs 5 6 3 ym ym ym 3 k2 k2 8µ 3 3 (r) =Xj,p,q 4 (r) =Xj,p,q 5 (r) =Xj,p,q 6 (r) =Xj,p,q" 2(1 + k2) r R gs r2 − +4πGρ0 k2 r ym (1 + k2) Um, j,p,q(r) , 8 3 R2!# Um, j,p,q(r) , (19a) (19b) (19c) (19d) (19e) (19f) s(r, θ, ϕ, t) = X(m, j,p,q)∈Ihym 1 (r) Rm 2 (θ, ϕ) +ym 3 (r) Sm 2 (θ, ϕ)i eiiiΨ2,m, j,p,q(t) , -- the total potential: (18a) where we have introduced the acceleration of gravity at the sur- face gs and the second-order Love number k2. The latter com- pares the perturbed part Φ′(R) of the self-gravitational potential at the surface of a fully-solid planet of mean radius R, deformed by tidal force, with the tidal perturbing potential U(R): (U+Φ′)(r, θ, ϕ, t) = X(m, j,p,q)∈I 5 (r) Ym ym 2 (θ, ϕ) eiiiΨ2,m, j,p,q(t), (18b) -- the Lagrangian traction: er · ¯¯σσσ(r, θ, ϕ, t) = X(m, j,p,q)∈Ihym 2 (r) Rm 2 (θ, ϕ) +ym 4 (r) Sm 2 (θ, ϕ)i eiiiΨ2,m, j,p,q(t) , (18c) -- the Lagrangian attraction (introduced to express the continu- ity of the gradient of the potential): ∀m ∈ [ − 2, 2], ym 6 (r) = d drhym 5 (r)i − 4πGρ0ym 1 (r) . (18d) The linear system governing the radial functions ym (r) is given in Appendix. In the case of an incompressible (K → +∞) and homogeneous body (µ, ρ0 = cst), the system (14) con- strained by boundary conditions (12) admits the following so- {1...6} def = k2 Φ′(R) U(R) . (20) The expression of k2 is established in Sect. 3, for an ocean-free planet (Eq. 61) or a two-layer planet (Eq. 63). 3. Modified elastic tidal theory in presence of a fluid envelope We now assume that planet A is not entirely solid, but has a fluid envelope. We follow the method proposed by Dermott (1979) to evaluate how the anelastic dissipation is modified by the pres- ence of a fluid layer surrounding the solid region. The first step consists in determining the behaviour of the elastic response in this configuration. We denote by Rc (resp. Rp) the mean radius of the solid core (resp. of the whole planet, including the height of the fluid layer); ρc and ρo designate the density of the core and the ocean, both assumed to be uniform, as a first step. More generally, all quantities will be written with a "c" subscript when evaluated at the core boundary, and with a "p" subscript if taken at the surface of the planet. The evolution of the system is de- scribed in the orbital frame RO : {A, XO, YO, ZO} centered on A and comoving with the perturber B. We will use polar coordi- nates (r, Θ) to locate a point P, where r is the distance to the center of A, and Θ is the angle formed by the radial vector and the line of centers. 5 F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets Fig. 3. Left: tidal displacement s. Middle: equatorial slice of s. Right: meridional slice of s. The orange arrow indicates the direction of the perturber B, the red one corresponds to the rotation axis of A. The two slices are planes of symmetry. 3.1. Verticaldeformationattheboundaryofthecore In RO, the tidal potential takes the form (Dermott 1979) P2(cos Θ) , U(r) = −ζ(r) g(r) P2(cos Θ) = −ζc gc where we have introduced the tidal height r2 R2 c and the gravity r , ζ(r) = MB M(r) (cid:18) r a(cid:19)3 g(r) = GM(r) , r2 (21) (22) (23) M(r) being the fraction of mass of the planet inside the radius r. The expression of the tidal potential in the rotating frame of B (Eq. 21) is linked to its expression in the equatorial inertial frame (Eq. 5), through the Kaula's transform (Eq. 1). Indeed, the Legendre polynomia summation formula P2(cos Θ) = Re  2Xm=0 (2 − m)! (2 + m)! (2 − δ0,m) Pm 2 (cos θ) eiiimϕ × Pm 2 (cos θB) e−iiimϕB (24) involves the term Pm transformed following Eq. (1-2) to obtain Eq. (5). 2 (cos θB) e−iiimϕB in Eq. (21) that has to be In this section we are interested in the mofication of Love num- bers due to the presence of a fluid envelope on top of the solid core. Thus, we will focus on the deformations of the core's surface, and particularly on the vertical displacements. Love (1911) proved that tidal deformations could be described by the same harmonic function than the tidal potential which causes it. Therefore the equations of the core and planet boundaries are respectively of the form rc ≡ Rc + sr(Rc) = Rc [1 + S 2 P2(cos Θ)] , rp = Rp [1 + T2 P2(cos Θ)] . (25a) (25b) Thus, sr(Rc) = Rc S 2 P2(cos Θ) represents the radial displace- ment at the core's boundary corresponding to the vertical tidal deformation of amplitude S 2 P2(cos Θ). In 1909, Love defined 6 the number h2, as the ratio between the amplitude of the verti- cal displacement at the surface of the planet and the equilibrium tidal height (disturbing potential divided by undisturbed surface gravity, both taken at the surface of the core) in the case of a fully-solid planet. Solving the whole system of equations, he de- termined its expression as sr(Rc) U(Rc)/gc ≡ Rc S 2 1 + ¯µ (26) 5 2 ζc def = h2 1 , = where ¯µ is called the effective rigidity, in the sense that it evalu- ates the relative importance of elastic and gravitational forces: ¯µ = 19µ 2ρcgRc . (27) In presence of the fluid envelope, the ratio between the amplitude of the tidal surface vertical displacement and the tidal height will be modulated by a multiplicative factor F, due to the additional loading exerted by the tidally-deformed fluid layer. We may then introduce a new notation hF 2 for the modified Love number in presence of a fluid envelope: def = hF 2 sr(Rc) U(Rc)/gc ≡ Rc S 2 ζc = F h2 = F × 5/2 1 + ¯µ . (28) We have now to express this factor in function of the parameters of the system. To do so, we have to list all the forces acting on the surface of the core. Before carrying out the study of these forces, let us introduce a specific notation. All physical quanti- ties X(r) will be separated in two terms: the first corresponds to the constant part that does not depend on where the quantity is calculated; the second one (called the "effective deforming" con- tribution and denoted X′(r)) is a term proportional to the spheri- cal surface harmonic P2 (see 24). 3.2. Gravitationalforcesactingonthesurfaceofthecore The planet is not only subjected to the direct action of the tidal potential U, but also to the self-gravitational potential Φ per- turbed by the first. In calculating the latter, we have to consider both contributions of the solid core and the fluid envelope, Φc and Φo respectively. At any point r of the core, Φc(r) corresponds to the internal po- tential created by the core : Φc(r) = − gc Rc 3R2 c − r2 2 + 3 5 r2 S 2 P2! . (29) F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets At the same point r, Φo(r) is the internal potential created by the fluid shell of density ρo and of lower and upper surface bound- aries rc and rp respectively: The perturbations of pressure P′(r, θ) obey the relation of the hydrostatic equilibrium which is of the following form, correct to first order in P2(cos Θ): ∇P′ = ρo ∇V′ + ρ′o ∇V0 . Therefore, the Θ-projection of (36) leads to (30) P′(r, Θ) = ρo V′(r, Θ) . (36) (37) Finally, since only the variable part of the pressure, i.e. P′, con- tributes to the normal effective traction f TN that acts on the mean 3 surface of core, this latter takes the following expression: f TN 3 (Rc) = P′(rc) = ρo V′(rc) = −ρo Zc R2 c P2 . (38) these three forces, to The sum of corresponds f TN (Rc) = f TN deforms mean surface of the core. Using Eqs. (33-34-38), we get: the 1 (Rc) + f TN 2 (Rc) + f TN represented on Fig. 4, traction the normal 3 (Rc) effective total that f TN (Rc) = (ρc Z − ρo Zc) R2 c P2 − ρc gc Rc S 2 P2 , (39) where the expressions of Z and Zc are given by equations (31c) and (32c) respectively, so that f TN (Rc) = X P2(cos Θ) , where we have denoted by X the following quantity: X = 2 5 ρc gc Rc 1 − ρo ρc!" 5 2 ζc Rc − S 2 + 3 2 ρo ρc (T2 − S 2)# . (40) (41) Fig. 4. Balance of forces that act on the mean surface of the core r = Rc: f TN 2 (Rc) the loading of the solid tide and f TN 1 (Rc) are the gravitational forces, f TN 3 (Rc) the hydrostatic pressure. 3.4. Amplitudeoftheverticaldeformation According to Melchior (1966), a deforming potential U2 of sec- ond order produces a deformation at each point rc of the surface of the core which radial component takes the form ǫrr = (cid:16)8R2 c(cid:17) c − 3r2 19µ ρc U2 r2 c . (42) 7 Φo(r) = − r2 T2 P2 3 5 c − r2 2 3 5 + ρo ρc + gc 3R2 Rc  p − r2 2 − 3R2 Rc −r2 + 3R2 c1 − gc ρo ρc 1 2 r2 S 2 P2!# . c − V′(r) , V(r) = − where the effective deforming potential is expressed by + R2 p R2 ρo ρc Therefore V(r) = U(r) + Φc(r) + Φo(r) has the following ex- pression, at any point r inside the core: Z being a constant that depends on the characteristics of the planet: V′(r) = −Z r2 P2 , + 3 5 ρo ρc (T2 − S 2) + (31a) (31b) (31c) (32a) We then obtain its expression, correct to first order in S 2P2 or T2P2, at any point rc = rc er of the surface of the core: 3 5 S 2# . c + V′(rc) , R2 p R2 ρo ρc gc Rc Z = Rc " ζc V(rc) = −gc Rc  1 − where ρo 3 2 3 2 ρc! + V′(rc) = −Zc R2 Rc " ζc ρo ρc 3 5 Rc gc + Zc = (32b) Zc being a constant that depends on the characteristics of the planet: c P2 , (T2 − S 2) − 2 5 S 2# . (32c) Chree (1896) showed that the deformation of the core's surface under the gravitational forces (that derive from the effective de- forming potential V′) is the same as that which would result from the outward normal traction f TN applied at its mean sur- 1 face r = Rc: f TN 1 (Rc) = ρc Z R2 c P2 . (33) 3.3. Totaleffectivenormaltractionactingonthesurfaceof thecore The mean surface of the core is subjected to two additional forces induced by both the loading of the core and the loading of the ocean, tidally deformed. First, the pressure due to the differential overloading of the de- formed elastoviscous matter on the mean surface of radius Rc is given by the product of the local gravity gc, the density of the core ρc and the solid tidal height RcS 2: f TN 2 (Rc) = −ρc gc Rc S 2 P2 . (34) We also have to take into account the oceanic hydrostatic pres- sure. Following Zahn (1966) and Remus et al. (2012), we ex- press all scalar quantities X(r, Θ) as the sum of their spherically symmetrical profile X0(r) and their perturbation X′(r, Θ) due to the tidal potential U(r, Θ) ∝ P2(cos Θ): X(r, Θ) = X0(r) + X′(r, Θ) ≡ X0(r) + X(r) P2(cos Θ) . (35) F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets Correct to first order in P2, recalling that rc = Rc (1 + S 2P2), this reduces to: where ǫrr = 5 19µ ρcU2 , (43) Wp being a constant that depends on the planet characteristics: V′(rp) = −gc Wp P2 , (52b) where ρcU2 is the deforming traction f T,N(Rc) = XP2 applied on the core. Furthermore, since the amplitude of the displacement is also given by ǫrr = S 2P2 (Eq. 25a), we have the following equality S 2P2 = XP2 . (44) 5 19µ Therefore the relation (27) beetween µ and ¯µ and the expression (41) of X enable us to relate the deformation of the surfaces of the core (S 2) and of the ocean (T2) as S 2 = 1 ¯µ 1 − ρo ρc!" 5 2 ζc Rc − S 2 + 3 2 ρo ρc (T2 − S 2)# . (45) where By definition, given in Eq. (28), the impedance F is of the form F = 2 5 (1 + ¯µ) Rc ζc S 2 . (46) Since the surface of the planet is an equipotential, the total po- tential V takes a constant value at any point rp of the surface of the ocean: V(rp) ≡ U(rp) + Φ(rp) = cst . As V − V′ = cst by definition, we get the simplier condition: (47) (48) V′(rp) ≡ U(rp) + Φ′(rp) = cst . At a point r of the ocean, Φc(r) corresponds to the external po- tential created by the core: c 1 Φc(r) = −gc R2 r + 3 5 R2 c S 2 r3 P2! . F = (49) 1 + ¯µ − ρo ρc At the same point r, Φo(r) is the internal potential created by the fluid shell of density ρo and of lower and upper surface bound- aries rc and rp respectively: Φo(r) = − gc R3 p Rc + gc R2 c 3 5 r2T2 R3 p ρo ρc  ρc 1 ρo r 3R2 + p − r2 2R3 p R2 c S 2 3 5 + r3 P2! . P2 (50) Therefore V(r) = U(r) + Φc(r) + Φo(r) has the following ex- pression, at any point r inside the ocean: V(r) = −gc R2 c  1 − ρo ρc! 1 r − ρo ρc r2 2R3 c + 3 2 ρo ρc where the effective deforming potential is expressed by R2 p R3 c + V′(r) , (51a) (51b) V′(r) = −gc R2 c W(r) P2 , W being a function of the distance r to the center of the planet: W(r) = ζc Rc r2 R3 c + 3 5 ρo ρc r2 R3 c T2 + r3 S 2 . (51c) We then obtain its expression at a point rp = rp er of the surface of the planet: c 3 ρo 5 1 − ρc! R2 Rc + V′(rp) , ρo ρc R2 p V(rp) = −gc 1 − 8 ρo ρc! R2 c Rp + The condition (48) takes then the form: Wp = R2 p R2 c ζc + 3 ρo 2 5 R2 p c R3 ρo ρc p S 2 5 1 − ρc! R4 +− Rc − 1 − 5 Rc Rp!5 1 − ρo Rc ρc! S 2 + Rp!3 1 − 5 2 ρo ρc 3 α = 1 + ζc Rc = − ρo ρc! . c ρo Rp T2 . ρc! R2 (52c) 2 5 ρo ρc α T2 , (53) We may eliminate the variable T2 thanks to Eq. (45): 2 5 α (cid:16)α + 3 + ρc(cid:17) 2(cid:17)(cid:16)1 − ρo ρc 1 − ρc! + ρo ρo 3 2 ρo ρc 3 2 Rc Rp!5 1 − 2 5 ρo ρc α T2 = ×1 + ¯µ − ρo ρc!2 . Injecting this relation into the expression (53) of ζc/Rc, and the resulting relation in the expression (46) of F, we finally get: (cid:16)1 − ρo ρc(cid:17) (1 + ¯µ)(cid:16)1 + 3 2α(cid:17) Rp(cid:19)5(cid:16)1 − ρo 4α(cid:18) Rc ρc(cid:17) − 9 ρc(cid:16)1 − ρo ρc(cid:17)2 + 3 2 ρo . (56) In the case of a shallow oceanic envelope (Rp ≃ Rc), the height of the oceanic tide is then given by Rc(T2 − S 2) at the surface of the core. Using Eqs. (53-45), we obtain the classical expression of the height of oceanic tide The height of the solid tidal displacement is given by RcS 2. Using Eqs. (57-53-45), we obtain its classical expression: Rc(T2 − S 2) = ρo ρc(cid:17) . ¯µζc 5 ρc 1 − ρo + ¯µ(cid:16)1 − 3 2 ζc(cid:16)1 − ρo ρc(cid:17) + ¯µ(cid:16)1 − 3 1 − ρo ρo ρc 5 5 ρc(cid:17) , RcS 2 = 5 2 ζp 1 + ¯µ RcS 2 = which reduces to (54) (55) (57) (58) (59) for an ocean-free planet (ρo = 0), which corresponds to that given by Lord Kelvin (1863). Thus, recalling Eq. (46), we de- duce that for an oceanless planet, F is unity. Fig. 5 displays the value of F for three types of planets (i.e. Earth-, Jupiter- and Saturn-like planets), with a given core (of fixed size, mass and shear modulus) and a fluid shell of fixed density but variable depth, so that the size and mass of the whole planet varies also. The variation of F is represented in function of Rc/Rp: the smaller this ratio, the higher the ocean depth. For the Earth, all parameters are well known (see Table 4). (52a) F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets The values of the ocean density for the Jupiter- and Saturn-like planets correspond to the ones we may deduce from the well known values of their global size and mass (see Table 5), and the much less constrained values of the core size and mass (see mod- els A of Table 6). Concerning the shear modulus, we used the value taken as reference by Henning et al. (2009) when studing the tidal heating of terrestrial exoplanets, i.e. µ = 5 × 1010 Pa. These models of planets are used as starting points to compare the influence the ocean depth has on core deformation for dif- ferent types of planets. Since we do not try to estimate this de- formation for realistic planets, we will not discuss in this section the validity of the values we use for the parameters. Fig. 5 shows that for a planet with a shallow fluid shell (i.e. when Rc & a × Rp, where a = {0.840, 0.915, 0.937} for an Earth-, Jupiter- and Saturn-like planet respectively), F is less than unity, which means that the ocean exerts a loading effect on the solid core which is stronger than the gravitational forces and opposed to it. That is the case of the Earth where the depth of the oceanic envelope does not exceeds 1% of the size of the planet, but giant planets are supposed to have a solid core no bigger than the third of the planet size. According to Fig. 5, F may reach values up to 2.3 for this kind of planets. That means that for a planet with a deep fluid envelope, the ocean tide has no loading effect on the core but exerts a gravitational force that amplifies the tidal deformation. We refer the reader to Dermott (1979) for a complete discussion. 3.5. ModifiedLovenumbers From Eq. (56) we deduce the Love number hF measures the surface deformation: 2 (cf. Eq. 28) which hF 2 = 1 + ¯µ − ρo ρc 5 2 (cid:16)1 − ρo ρc(cid:16)1 − ρo ρc(cid:17)(cid:16)1 + 3 2α(cid:17) Rp(cid:19)5(cid:16)1 − ρo 4α(cid:18) Rc ρc(cid:17) − 9 ρc(cid:17)2 ρo + 3 2 . (60) Reference http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/ planetary/factsheet/earthfact.html Charette & Smith (2010)  Quantity Value 5.9736 × 1024 6371 × 103 M⊕p (kg) R⊕p (m) M⊕c (kg) M⊕p − 1.4 × 1021 R⊕p − 3682 × 103 R⊕c (m) Table 4. Earth parameters. Quantity Jupiter Rp (m) Mp (kg) 10.973 × R⊕p 317.830 × M⊕p Saturn 9.140 × R⊕p 95.159 × M⊕p Reference http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa. gov/planetary/factsheet/ Table 5. Mass and mean radius of Jupiter and Saturn. Rc (m) Mc (kg) Reference Jupiter 0.126 × Rp 6.41 × M⊕p http://www.oca.eu/guillot/ jupsat.html (Guillot, 1998) Saturn 0.219 × Rp 18.65 × M⊕p Hubbard et al. (2009) Table 6. Mass and mean radius of Jupiter's and Saturn's cores. for Earth-, in terms of Factor F, accounting for Fig. 5. the overloading ex- erted by the tidally deformed oceanic envelope on the solid core, the ocean depth throw the ratio Rc/Rp for three types of planet. Parameters are given in Tables 4-5-6: Jupiter- and Saturn-like plan- ets, we that: Rp = {1, 10.97, 9.14} (in units of R⊕p), Mp = {1, 317.8, 95.16} (in units of M⊕p ), (in Rc = {0.99, 0.126, 0.219}× Rp, Mc = {0.33, 6.41, 18.65} units of M⊕p ) and µ = 5 × 1010 (Pa) for all cores. Note that this figure is similar to that drawned by Dermott (1979), divergences coming from the use of different values of the parameters. respectively assume Let us give here the expression of the second-order Love number (20) associated with the solid core. First of all, let us recall its value for an ocean-free planet: According to Eq. (29) with r = Rc, we get k2 = h2 = 3 5 3 2 1 1 + ¯µ . (61) In presence of an ocean on top of the solid core, we may also introduce the modified Love number V′(Rc) − U(Rc) (62) def = = = kF 2 V′(Rc) U(Rc) − 1 , Φ′(Rc) U(Rc) U(Rc) where V′(Rc) and U(Rc) are obtained from Eqs. (31b) and (21) respectively, with r = Rc. Thus, expressing ζc/Rc in function of the modified second-order Love number hF 2 according to Eq. (28), and using Eq. (45), we obtain the expression of kF 2 in terms of hF 2 : kF 2 =1 + 2 5 ¯µ 1 − ρo ρc hF 2 − 1 . (63) In this section we have studied the impact of the presence of a fluid envelope in the determination of the deformation imposed on an elastic core under tidal forcing. In the following, we con- sider that the solid core also presents viscous properties so that its response to the tidal force exerced by the perturber is no more immediate, thus inducing dissipation. The next section addresses the quantification of this conversion of energy, which drives the dynamical evolution of the whole system. 4. Anelastic tidal dissipation: analytical results Assuming that the anelasticity is linear, the correspondence prin- ciple established by Biot (1954) allows us to extend the formu- lation of the adiabatic elastic problem to the resolution of the 9 F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets equivalent dissipative anelastic problem. For initial conditions taken as zero and similar geometries, the Laplace and Fourier transforms of the anelastic equations and boundary conditions are identical to the elastic equations, if the rheological param- eters and radial functions are defined as complex numbers. We will then denote (64) the complex stress tensor, and 4.2. Caseofatwo-layerplanet Let us introduce the quantities A = 1 − B = 1 − ρo ρc! 1 + ρo ρc + 3 2 3 2α! , and: ρc! − ρc 1 − ρo ρo 9 4α Rc Rp!5 1 − ≈σσσ ≡ ¯¯σσσ1 + iii ¯¯σσσ2 ≈ǫǫǫ ≡ ¯¯ǫǫǫ1 + iii ¯¯ǫǫǫ2 (65) in the expression (56) of F: F = A(1 + ¯µ) B + ¯µ , and let us define its complex equivalent (75a) , (75b) ρo ρc!2 (76) (77) the complex strain tensor. The perturbative strain is cyclic, with tidal pulsations σ2,m,p,q. For sake of clarity, we will use from now on the generic notation ω ≡ σ2,m,p,q, recalling that there is a large range of tidal frequen- cies for each term of the expansion of the tidal potential. The stress and strain tensors take the following form: ≈σσσ(ω) = ( ¯¯σσσ1 + iii ¯¯σσσ2) eeeiiiωt , ≈ǫǫǫ(ω) = ≈ǫǫǫ0 eeeiiiωt . The complex rigidity µ(ω) ≡ µ1(ω) + iii µ2(ω) , (66a) (66b) (67) where µ1 represents the energy storage and µ2 the energy loss of the system, is defined by µ(ω) ≡ ≈σσσ(ω) ≈ǫǫǫ(ω) . We may also define the complex effective rigidity by: where (see Eq. 27) µ(ω) ≡ ¯µ1(ω) + iii ¯µ2(ω) µ(ω) = γ µ(ω) , γ = µ µ ≡ ¯µ µ = 19 2ρcgcRc . (68) (69) (70) (71) 4.1. Caseofafully-solidplanet The complex Love number k2 may be expressed in terms of the complex effective rigidity µ, by: 1 1 + µ(ω) k2(ω) = = 3 2 3 2 1 1 + γ(cid:2)µ1(ω) + iiiµ2(ω)(cid:3) , in the case of a completely solid planet. The real part of k2 characterizes the purely elastic deforma- tion, since −Im (k2) gives the phase lag due to the viscosity. Therefore, we define the factor of tidal dissipation Q, that repre- sents the dissipation rate due to viscous friction, by Then, from equation (72), we deduce that Q−1(ω) = −Im k2(ω) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)k2(ω)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) Q(ω) = s1 +" 1 ¯µ2(ω) + ¯µ1(ω) ¯µ2(ω)#2 . (73) . (74) 10 A(1 + µ) B + µ . eF = The determination of how the presence of an oceanic envelope will modify the tidal dissipation consists in the determination of kF 2 , defined as the complex Love number k2 in presence of the fluid envelope. According to the correspondence principle, this number is given by the complex Fourier transform of (63), i.e. : kF 2 (ω) =1 + From (63) we get then kF 2 (ω) = 1 (B + ¯µ1)2 + ¯µ2 2 ×("(B + ¯µ1) C + 2 5 µ(ω) 1 − ρo ρc hF 2 (ω) − 1 . (78) 3 2α ¯µ1! + 3 2α ¯µ2 2# − iiiA D ¯µ2) , (79) where we made use of the dimensionless quantities α, A and B previously defined (see respectively Eqs. 54 and 75), C and D given by: C = D = 3 2 1 − 2 1 − 3 is of the form: Q(ω) = vuut1 + ρo ρc!2 , (80a) (80b) (81) Rp!5 1 − ρo ρo + 9 5 3 ρo ρc 4α Rc 2α! + ρc! 1 − ρc!1 + Rp!5 . 2α Rc Q−1(ω) = −Im kF 2 (ω)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)kF (B + ¯µ1(ω))(cid:16) 2αC 4α2A2D2 1 + ¯µ2(ω) 2 (ω) 9 , 3 + ¯µ1(ω)(cid:17) 2 .  (82) Thanks to the correspondence principle, one is able to derive this general expression of the tidal dissipation valid for any rheology. The obtained formulae explicitly reveal its dependence on the tidal frequency ω ≡ σ2,m,p,q, as shown, for example, by Remus et al. (2012), Ogilvie & Lin (2004-2007) for fluid layers. (72) Finally, the dissipation factor Q, defined here by F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets 4.3. Implementationofananelasticmodel Since the factor Q depends on the real and imaginary compo- nents ¯µ1 and ¯µ2 of the complex effective shear modulus µ, we need to define the rheology of the studied body to express it in terms of the constitutive parameters of the material. The anelasticity of a material is evaluated by a quality factor Qa defined by Qa(ω) = . (83) µ1(ω) µ2(ω) We may express the solid tidal dissipation, given by Q (Eq. 74) for a fully-solid planet and Q (Eq. 82) in the case of a two-layer planet, in terms of this factor: where the time derivative of a given quantity is denoted by a dot. Recalling the relation (68) this equation becomes: G ≈ǫǫǫ(ω) µ(ω) + η d dt(cid:20) µ(ω) ≈ǫǫǫ(ω)(cid:21) = G η ≈ǫǫǫ(ω) . (87) Therefore the real part µ1 and the imaginary part µ2 of the com- plex shear modulus µ have the following expressions: µ1(ω) = µ2(ω) = η2 G ω2 G2 + η2 ω2 , η G2 ω G2 + η2 ω2 . (88a) (88b) (89) Q(ω ≡ σ2,m,p,q) = s1 +" 1 ¯µ2(ω) + Qa(ω)#2 , (84) The anelastic quality factor Qa is then given by Qa(ω) = µ1(ω) µ2(ω) = η ω G ≡ ω τM , and Q(ω ≡ σ2,m,p,q) = s1 + 4α2A2D2"1 + B 9 ¯µ2(ω) + Qa(ω)! 2 3 αC ¯µ2(ω) + Qa(ω)!#2 . (85) All previous results are independent of the viscoelastic rheolog- ical model. We have now to apply these general expressions to a specific rheology which will depend on the physical properties of the material. Considering our lack of knowledge on the in- ternal structure of giant planets, we will implement the simplest model, namely the Maxwell model, which presents the advan- tage to involve only two parameters and thus to be easy to use (Tobie 2003, and Tobie et al. 2005). A critical overview of the four main rheological models has also been done by Henning et al. (2009), thus we refer the reader to the three above mentioned papers for a detailed comparison. 4.4. TheMaxwellmodel. This model considers a viscoelastic material as a spring-dashpot serie. The instantaneous elastic response is characterized by a shear modulus G , and the viscous yielding is represented by a viscous scalar modulus η (see Fig. 6). Notice that the shear mod- uli G and µ (introduced in Sect. 2.4) designate the same quan- tity. We change here the notation to avoid any confusion with the complex shear modulus µ used to study the anelastic tidal dissi- pation, and whose real and imaginary parts involve both G and η. Fig. 6. Representation of the Maxwell model and its correspond- ing notations. The constitutive equation is given by Henning et al. (2009): G ≈σσσ(ω) + η ≈σσσ(ω) = G η ≈ǫǫǫ(ω) , (86) where τM = η/G is the characteristic time of relaxation of the Maxwell model. As confirmed by Fig. 7, Eq. (89) shows that Qa increases linearly with the frequency of the cyclic tidal strain: the shorter the oscillation period, the lower the dissipation due to intrinsic viscoelastic properties of the material. Moreover, the anelastic quality factor is proportional to τM = η/G, so that it dissipates more if it is more rigid and less viscous. Fig. 7. Anelastic quality factor Qa of the Maxwell model in function of the tidal pulsation ω for different values of the viscos- ity η. G is taken equal to 5 × 1010 Pa (see Henning et. al 2009). Qa is represented on a logarithmic scale. Thus, we may express µ2 (Eq. 88b) in terms of the anelastic qual- ity factor Qa (Eq. 89): µ2(ω) = G (ω τM)−1 + ω τM . (90) In the case of a fully-solid body, we get, from Eqs. (83) and (90), the imaginary part of the complex Love number k2 (72): Im hk2(ω)i = − 3γ 2 G ω τM 1 + (ω τM)2 (1 + γG)2 . (91) Therefore the dissipation factor Q defined by (74) is of the form: Q(ω ≡ σ2,m,p,q) = s1 +( 1 Gγ h(ω τM)−1 + ω τMi + ω τM)2 . (92) 11 F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets In the more general case of a two-layer body, the imaginary part of the complex Love number kF 2 given by Eq. (79), takes a dif- ferent form than Eq. (91) because of the presence of the fluid Q (82) with envelope, so does the two-layer dissipation factor respect to its oceanless form (92). To obtain them, one needs to replace the shear modulus µ and the anelastic quality factor Qa by their expression in the case of the Maxwell model (Eqs 88 and 89 respectively). Fig. 8 compares the dissipation of the solid core with and without the presence of a fluid envelope of variable depth for a Saturn- like planet, using the parameters given by Tables 5-6-7: as ex- pected, the difference between the two decreases with the size of the fluid envelope down to about 0.34 × Rp; but for a thiner fluid shell, the dissipation get lower than it would be without it. present knowledge of extrasolar giant planets, and also planets of our Solar System like Jupiter or Saturn, suffers some uncer- tainties on the values of these parameters, so that the range of values taken by core properties of giant planets presents poor constraints. Moreover, even if the presence of a core in Jupiter is not yet confirmed (see Guillot 1999-2005), but new data coming from seismology may provide more constraints on giant plan- ets internal structure (see Gaulme et al. 2011). Nevertheless, we will explore the resulting tidal dissipation of such bodies around values of the structural and rheological parameters taken as ref- erence and corresponding to those of the literature. 5.1. Baselinestructuralandrheologicalparameters As reference models, we chose Jupiter and Saturn although their core parameters are still uncertain. The values of the global sizes and masses of these planets are those of Table 5. 5.1.1. Size and mass of the core Presently, two main types of models are available for Jupiter's interior. The NHKFRB group1 uses a three-layer model with a thin radiative zone, close to previous models by Saumon & Guillot (2004), whereas the MHVTB group2 proposes a new type of Jupiter model that possesses only two layers (see Militzer et al. 2008). But, as explained in Militzer & Hubbard (2009), the crucial difference lies in the treatment of the molecular-to-metallic transition in dense fluid hydro- gen, that leads to very different conclusions. The first group predicts a small core of less than 10 M⊕p (Saumon & Guillot 2004), while the second obtains a larger core of 14-18 M⊕p (Militzer et al. 2008). Among all these models of Jupiter's in- terior, we choose as reference the adiabatic model with Plasma Phase Transition (PPT) (http://www.oca.eu/guillot/jupsat.html)3 of Guillot (1998), which is of the first type. It predicts a core of radius Rc = 0.126 × Rp and mass Mc = 6.41 × M⊕p . Only the mass of the core of this reference model will be used in what follows. The core radius will serve just as a first approximation, as a starting point in our study, since we will present our results for several core sizes. inte- There rior. According to the model of Guillot with PPT (http://www.oca.eu/guillot/jupsat.html)3, Saturn's core may have a mass of Mc = 6.55 × M⊕p and a size of Rc = 0.174 × Rp. More recently, Hubbard et al. (2009) infer, from Cassini- Huygens data, that Saturn has a larger core in the range Mc = 15-20× M⊕p and a corresponding radius of more than 20% of the planet size. We adopt this latter as reference model of Saturn, with Mc = 18.65 × M⊕p and Rc = 0.219 × Rp. All these models support core accretion as the standard process for the formation of giant planets. The corresponding parameters are listed in Table 6. different models Saturn's also are of this value, 2(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)/ Q and (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)k2(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)/Q. We Fig. 8. Relative difference between (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)kF may distinguish two regimes: for 0 < Rc < 0.661 Rp the presence of the fluid envelope increases the tidal dis- sipation; over than it would have been without fluid shell. Parameters are given in Tables 5-6-7 for a Saturn-like planet perturbed at the tidal frequency of Enceladus (ω = 2.25 × 10−4 rad · s−1): Rp = 9.14 R⊕p, Mp = 95.16 M⊕p, Rc = 0.219 R⊕p, Mc = 18.65 M⊕p , G = 5 × 1010 (Pa) and η = 1015 (Pa · s). tidal dissipation is lower Planet Satellite ω (rad · s−1) Reference Jupiter Io 2.79 × 10−4 Ioannou et Lindzen (1993) Saturn Enceladus 2.25 × 10−4 Lainey et al. (2012) Table 7. Tidal frequencies considered in numerical applications. 5. Anelastic tidal dissipation: role of the structural and rheological parameters The main uncertainties concern the viscoelastic properties of the core, namely its shear modulus G and its viscosity η. At 5.1.2. Rheological parameters of the core With our choice of the Maxwell model to represent the rheol- ogy of the solid parts of the planet, the dissipation quality factor Q depends on the tidal frequency ω and on four structural and rheological parameters: the relative size of the core (Rc/Rp), the relative density of the envelope with respect to the core (ρo/ρc), the shear modulus (G) and the viscosity of the core (η). Our 12 2008). 3 It 1 Nettelmann, Holst, Kietzmann, French, Redmer and Blaschke (Nettelmann et al. 2008). 2 Militzer, Hubbard, Vorberger, Tamblyn, and Bonev (Militzer et al. is constructed with CEPAM, Code d'Evolution Plan´etaire Adaptatif et Modulaire (Guillot & Morel, 1995). F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets Fig. 9. Dissipation quality factor Qeff of the Maxwell model in function of the viscoelastic parameters G and η. Top: for a Jupiter- like two-layer planet tidally perturbed at the Io's frequency ω ≃ 2.79 × 10−4 rad · s−1. Bottom: for a Saturn-like two-layer planet Qeff = tidally perturbed at the Enceladus' frequency ω ≃ 2.25 × 10−4 rad · s−1. The red dashed line corresponds to the value of {(3.56 ± 0.56) × 104, (1.682 ± 0.540) × 103} (for Jupiter and Saturn respectively) determined by Lainey et al. (2009-2012). The blue lines corresponds to the lower and upper limits of the reference values taken by the viscoelastic parameters G and η for an unknown mix of ice and silicates. We assume the values of Rp = {10.97, 9.14} (in units of R⊕p), Mp = {317.8, 95.16} (in units of M⊕p ), Mc = {6.41, 18.65} × M⊕p given in Tables 5-6. high pressure and temperature, theoretical models and experi- ments show that G and η values depend on temperature and pres- sure. But no experiments are available at the very-high pressures and temperatures we may expect in Jupiter's and Saturn's cores (Guillot 2005). Nevertheless, geophysical and experimental data have allowed to constrain the rheology of the icy satellites of Jupiter, since their ranges of pressure and temperature are simi- lar to those of the outer mantle of the Earth (Tobie 2003). Then, keeping in mind that these values may differ by several orders of magnitude in our case, we will adopt reference values based on these data, assuming that Jupiter's and Saturn's cores are made of ice and rock. We will then explore, in the following Sect. 5.2, the variation of the tidal dissipation for a large range of values of the rheological parameters around those taken as reference. We thus assume that the shear modulus G is in the range Concerning the viscosity η, it takes its values in the range hGice = 4 × 109 (Pa) , Gsilicate = 1011 (Pa)i (Henning et al. 2009). hηice = 1014Pa · s, ηsilicate = 1021 Pa · si for the icy satellites of Jupiter at high pressure (Tobie 2003). We expand this range, re- ducing its lower boundary by two orders of magnitude, following the discussion of Karato (2011) which seems to indicate that, at the very high pressures, viscosity in deep interior of super-Earths may decrease by two or three orders of magnitude. We refer the reader to the Karato's paper for an overview of all plausi- ble mechanisms that may cause a change in the viscous-pressure relationship at very-high pressures. 5.2. Dependenceoftidaldissipationonrheology Since tidal dissipation causes exchange of angular momentum in the system, it may be quantified by monitoring carefuly the orbital motion of the system. Using astrometric data covering more than a century, Lainey et al. (2009-2012) succeeded in determining from observations the tidal dissipation in Jupiter and Saturn: namely, QJupiter = (3.56 ± 0.56) × 104 determined by Lainey et al. (2009), and QSaturn = (1.682 ± 0.540) × 103 deter- mined by Lainey et al. (2012) and requireded by the formation scenario of Charnoz et al. (2011). However, with such a method, the different contributions to the global tidal dissipation, com- ing from each layer constituting the planet, are lumped together. Equations of the dynamical evolution (Eqs. 99 to 103) link the observed evolution rates of the rotational and orbital parame- ters to the observed tidal dissipation and system characteristics. Since all these rates are proportional to R5 p, where Rp is the planet 13 F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets Fig. 10. Dissipation quality factor Qeff normalized to the size of the planet for Jupiter-like and Saturn-like giant planets. Note that all curves are represented with a logarithmic scale. Left: dependence to the perturbative strain pulsation ω, with Rc = {0.20, 0.34} × Rp. Right: dependence to the size of the core, with ω ≃ 2.25 × 10−4 rad · s−1 (tidal frequency of Enceladus) for the blue curve associated to a Saturn-like planet, and ω ≃ 2.79 × 10−4 rad · s−1 (tidal frequency of Io) for the red curve associated to a Jupiter-like planet. The green curve corresponds to the prescription of Goodman & Lackner (2009) (see plain text for details). The red and blue dashed lines correspond to the value of Qeff = {(3.56 ± 0.56) × 104, (1.682 ± 0.540) × 103} (for Jupiter and Saturn respectively) determined by Lainey et al. (2009-2012). Their zone of uncertainty is also represented in the corresponding color. We assume the values of Rp = {10.97, 9.14} (in units of R⊕p), Mp = {317.8, 95.16} (in units of M⊕p ), Mc = {6.41, 18.65} × M⊕p given in Tables 5-6. We also take for the viscoelastic parameters G = {4.85, 4.45} × 1010 (Pa), and η = {1.26, 1.78} × 1014 (Pa · s−1) for Jupiter and Saturn respectively. radius, we introduce the associated dissipation factor 4: Qeff = Rp Rc!5 × kF 2 (Rp) 2 (Rc) × Q , kF (93) where kF 2 (Rc) can be deduced from Eq. (81), and kF 2 (Rp) des- ignates the modulus of the second order Love number of the planet's surface that is obtained from Eqs. (52) and (21) kF 2 (Rp) = V′(Rp) U(Rp) − 1 = 2 5 ρo ρc ρo Rp(cid:19)3 (cid:16)1 − ρo ρc −(cid:18) Rc ρc(cid:17) Rp(cid:19)5(cid:16)1 − ρo 5(cid:18) Rc ρc(cid:16)α + 3 ρc(cid:17)2 ρo 2(cid:17) 1 α − 3 2 Rc ρc!2 ρc! + ρc 1 − Rp!5 1 − 3 2 ρo ρo ρo 3 , H where H acounts for the quantity H = 1 + µ − ρo ρc + kF 2 (Rc) and kF the second Therefore, we can evaluate the real part of order Love numbers 2 (Rp), accounting re- spectively for the deformation of the core's and planet's surface, for parameters whose values are compatible with the tidal dissipation observations (Lainey et al., 2009- in this order, assuming 2012). For Jupiter and Saturn, G = {4.85, 4.45} × 1010 Pa Rc = {0.170, 0.260}× Rp, that η = {1.26, 1.78} × 1014 Pa · s, that and Re hkF 2 (Rc)i = {3.21, 3.31} 2 (Rp)i = {1.37, 0.24}. and These estimations at the planet's surface can be compared to the value of Gavrilov & Zharkov (1977) of k2 = 0.379 for Jupiter and k2 = 0.341 for Saturn obtained for stratified models. As discussed in the aforementioned paper, the differences between both evaluations are linked to the degree of stratification: the more the planet interior is stratified, the smaller the second order Love number (we recall that the second order Love number of a homogeneous fluid planet is 3/2). Re hkF obtain we (94) . (95) 5.3. Dependenceoftidaldissipationonthesizeofthecore andthetidalfrequency Since we have weak constraints on the viscoelastic parameters of giant planet cores (Guillot 2005), we thus have to explore a large Qeff range of values. Fig. 9 shows the tidal dissipation factor around the reference values presented in Sect. 5.1, expanding the range up to about ± 2-4 orders of magnitude for G and η. In the middle region (inside the blue rectangle on Fig. 9), where η and G correspond to the reference values, the dissipation factor Qeff of Saturn (resp. Jupiter) may reach values of the order of 103 (resp. 104), and in the whole field it varies up to 1020. From Fig. 9, we deduce that the tidal dissipation of the core may reach the values observed for Jupiter (Lainey et al. 2009) and Saturn (Lainey et al. 2012) assuming that Jupiter's core (resp. Saturn's core) has a radius 34.92% (resp. 18.72%) larger than this of Guillot 1998 (resp. Hubbard 2009). 4 This can also be demonstrated by calculating the perturbation of the gravific potential at the surface of the planet, adapting Zahn (1966) theory taking into account the boundary conditions at the core surface. For Fig. 10, the values of the viscoelastic parameters G and η, and of the core size Rc result from Fig. 9: we chose them so as the tidal dissipation factor Q reaches the observed values of Lainey et al. (2009-2012) on the condition that the rheological parame- ters stand in the more realistic domain defined by the lowest and highest value of the ice and rock viscoelasticities taken as refer- ence. Taking into account the global dissipation values obtained by Lainey et al. 2009 & 2012 for Jupiter and Saturn, we may deduce some constraints on the viscoelastic parameters and also the size of the core (looking at the red dashed line in Fig. 9). We thus will assume that they take values allowing such a dissipa- tion: -- we first chose a core slightly larger than that assumed until now: Rc = 0.170 × Rp for Jupiter, and Rc = 0.260 × Rp for Saturn, -- we then fixed the value of the shear modulus G to the low- est value needed to reach the observed tidal dissipation of 14 F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets Lainey et al. (2009-2012), i.e. G = 4.85 × 1010 Pa for Jupiter, and G = 4.45 × 1010 Pa for Saturn, -- e finally searched the more realistic value of the viscos- ity which corresponds to the observed tidal dissipations of Jupiter and Saturn: η = 1.26 × 1014 Pa · s for Jupiter, and η = 1.78 × 1014 Pa · s for Saturn. Fig. 10 explores, for the present model, the dependence of Qeff on the pulsation ω and the size of the core Rc normalized by the size of the planet Rp. With these parameters, the figure indicates that Saturn dissipates slightly more than ten times more than Jupiter, since (Rc)Saturn > (Rc)Jupiter and (ρc)Saturn < (ρc)Jupiter. In the range of tidal frequencies of Jupiter's and Saturn's satellites (2.25 × 10−4 rad · s−1 < ω < 2.95 × 10−4 rad · s−1, Lainey et Qeff keeps the al. 2009-2012), the effective dissipation factor same order of magnitude. However, it strongly depends on the size of the core, as it may loose up to 6 orders of magnitude between a coreless planet and a fully-solid one. Note that for a given core (so that Mc, Rc and then ρc are fixed) and a given mass of the planet Mp, the density of the fluid envelope ρo, which varies with its height Rp − Rc, can not exceed ρc. Since: ρo (Rc) = c(cid:17) , p − R3 this condition gives a limit for the core size: Mp − Mc 4/3 π(cid:16)R3 = Mc Mp!1/3 Rp!sup Rc (96) . (97) In 2004, Ogilvie & Lin also studied tidal dissipation in giant planets, and particulary the tidal dissipation resulting from the excitation of inertial waves in the convective region by the tidal potential for rotating giant planets with an elastic solid core. They obtained a decrease of the quality factor Q of one or- der of magnitude considering the dynamical tide (due to iner- tial modes) compared to the equilibrium one: from Q = 106 to Q = 105, but it is not efficient enough to explain the observed tidal dissipations in Jupiter or Saturn which are of 1-2 orders of magnitude higher (Lainey et al. 2009-2012). Moreover, they showed that the dissipation resulting from the resonance be- tween fluid tide and inertial modes highly depends on the tidal frequency in the range of inertial waves, as do also the core- less models (Wu 2005). This disagrees with the weak frequency- dependence obtained from astrometry (Lainey et al. 2012). By discussing the size of the core, Goodman & Lackner (2009) got a higher value of the quality factor Q, in the range 107 − 108 ×(cid:16)0.2 Rp/Rc(cid:17)5 which disagrees with the observed value of the tidal dissipation of Saturn (see Fig. 9). The present two-layer model proposes an alternative process to reach such a high dissipation with a smooth frequency- dependence of Q. But the uncertainties on the structural and rhe- ological parameters does not allow us to firmly conclude that the tidal dissipation of the core can explain by its own the tidal dis- sipation observed in giant planets of our Solar System by Lainey et al. (2009-2012). Through these expressions of the tidal dissipation closely linked to the internal structure of the planet and its rheological proper- ties, we are now able to derive the equations of the dynamical evolution of the system with explicit dependence on the tidal frequency. 5.4. ComparisonwithpreviousworkofDermott The difference beetwen our study and the work of Dermott (1979) lies in the treatment of the tidal dissipation. Dermott draws his expression from an evolution scenario of Saturnian and Jovian systems. He assumes that the satellites of Jupiter and Saturn were formed 4.5 × 109 ago, and that their semi-major axis have changed by 10 % since their formation, with a stable resonance of the main satellites of Jupiter (Io, Europa and Ganymede) since their formation but a young res- onance of the satellites Mimas and Thetys of Saturn. He also assumes an average value of the tidal dissipation, independent of amplitude, frequency and time. All these assumptions lead Dermott (1979) to a tidal dissipation factor Q that only depends on the mass Mc, the size Rc, the elasticity µ of the core and a dimensionless coefficient K characteristic of the evolution sce- nario of the planet. In particular, his tidal factor Q is directly proportional to R5 c (Eq. 27 of Dermott 1979), so that the tidal dissipation gets lower as the core size increases (see Fig. 4 of Dermott 1979), while one should expect an opposite behaviour. Instead, our model is constructed on physical considerations of the internal structure and properties of the core. In particular, we derived our tidal dissipation factor Q with no assumption on the evolution of the Jovian and Saturnian systems. To do so, we used the correspondence principle of Biot (1954). This allowed us to obtain an expression of the tidal dissipation factor valid for any rheological model of planets' cores. Moreover, our expression (82) of Q not only depends on the mass Mc, the size Rc and the elasticity µ of the core, but also on the tidal frequency ω and the viscosity η. We notice, in particular, that tidal dissipation in- creases when the size of the core increases, contrary to Dermott's strange result. 6. Equations of the dynamical evolution Mass redistribution due to the tide generates a tidal torque of non-zero average which induces an exchange of angular momen- tum between the orbital motion and the rotation of each com- ponent. As shown in MLP09 & Remus et al. (2012), this tidal 2(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)/Q (see torque is proportional to the tidal dissipation ratio(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)kF ducing a torque,ZV also Correia & Laskar 2003, Correia et al. 2003, and Murray & Dermott 2000). Note that for a perfectly elastic material, the core will be elongated in the direction of the line of centers, in- r ∧ (ρc∇∇∇U) dV, with periodic variations of zero average, so that no secular exchanges of angular momentum will be possible (see Zahn 1966a and Remus et al. 2012). On the other hand, if the core is anelastic, the deformation of the core resulting from the equilibrium adjustment presents a time delay ∆t with respect to the tidal forcing, which may be measured also by the tidal lag angle 2δl or equivalently by the quality factor Q (see Ferraz-Mello et al. 2008 or Efroimsky & Williams 2009): tanh∆t × σ2,m,p,qi = tanh2δ(cid:16)σ2,m,p,q(cid:17)i = 1 Q(cid:16)σ2,m,p,q(cid:17) . (98) Thus, the tidal bulge is no more aligned with the line of centers, as shown in Fig. 11. The resulting tidal angle is at the origin of a torque of non-zero average which causes exchange of spin and orbital angular mo- mentum between the components of the system. The evolution of the semi-major axis a, of the eccentricity e, of the inclination I, of the obliquity ε and of the angular veloc- ity Ω ( ¯IA denotes the moment of inertia of A), is governed by 15 F. Remus, S. Mathis, J.-P. Zahn & V. Lainey: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets where the functions Hm, j,p,q(e, I, ε) are expressed in terms of d2 j,m(ε), F2, j,p(I), and G2,p,q(e), which are defined in Sect. 2.2 H2,m, j,p,q(e, I, ε) = s 5 4π j,m(ε) F2, j,p(I) G2,p,q(e) , (104) (2 − j)! (2 + j)! × d2 and Req designates the equatorial radius of body A. From these equations one may derive the characteristic times of synchronization, circularization and spin alignment: 1 tsync 1 tcirc 1 talignA 1 talignOrb = − , 1 = − Ω − n de 1 dt e 1 ε 1 I dε dt dI dt = − = − dΩ dt = − 1 ¯IA (Ω − n) d(cid:16) ¯IA Ω(cid:17) dt , = = 1 d (cos ε) ε sin ε dt 1 d (cos I) I sin I dt , . (105) (106) (107) (108) 7. Conclusion 2 and kF To conclude, the purpose of this work was to study the tidal dis- sipation in a two-layer planet consisting in a rocky/icy core and a fluid envelope, as one expects to be the case in Jupiter, Saturn, and many extrasolar planets. We considered the most general configuration where the perturber (star or satellite) is moving on an elliptical and inclined orbit around the planet which rotates on an inclined axis. We expanded the tidal displacement in Fourier series and spherical harmonics, each term of the expansion hav- ing a radial part proportional to that of the corresponding term of the tidal potential, which depends on the eccentricity, the in- clination and the obliquity. We followed the method by Dermott (1979) to derive the modified Love numbers hF 2 account- ing for the tidal deformation at the boundary of the solid core. Like Dermott, we made the simplifying assumption that core and envelope have a constant density. Then, generalizing the results of his work invoking the correspondence principle, we obtained 2 / Q, Q be- the tidal dissipation rate of the core expressed by kF ing the quality factor. That ratio depends on the tidal frequency and on the rheological properties of the core; unlike Dermott we made no assumption on the formation history of the system. As mentioned in Sect. 5.1 the rheological properties of planetary cores are still quite uncertain. However, taking plausible values for the viscoelastic parameters G and η, we obtain a tidal dissi- pation which may be much higher than for a fully fluid planet and weakly frequency-dependent. Under these assumptions, we find that the low value of Q = (1.682 ± 0.540) × 103, determined by Lainey et al. (2012) and needed by Charnoz et al. (2011) to explain the formation of all mid-size moons of Saturn from the rings, can be reached taking into account the tidal dissipation of Saturn's core. In the same way, the dissipation in Jupiter's core may explain the value of the Q-factor determined by Lainey et al. (2009), i.e. Q = (3.56 ± 0.56) × 104. But to do so, we need to assume a core in Jupiter and Saturn slightly larger than those of Guillot (1998) and Hubbard et al. (2009). But we recall that in our model the density was assumed to be piecewise constant. In the future, we shall consider a non constant density profile, to evaluate the impact on our results of a realistic density stratifi- cation. Moreover, there are much uncertainties on the determi- nation of the core size in giant planets as Jupiter and Saturn, so Fig. 11. Tidal interaction involving a solid body. Body B exerts a tidal force on body A, which adjusts itself with a phase lag 2 δ, because of internal friction in the anelastic core. This ad- justment may be split in an adiabatic component, corresponding to the elastic deformation, in phase with the tide, and a dissipa- tive one, resulting from the viscous internal frictions, which is in quadrature. the following equations, established in MLP09 and Remus et al. (2012): 2 (Rp, σ2,m,p,q)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)kF Qeff(σ2,m,p,q) BR5 GM2 eq a6 2 (Rp, σ2,m,p,q)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) Qeff(σ2,m,p,q) = dt dt ¯IA Ω 4π 5 8π 5 = − d (cos ε) BR5 GM2 eq a6 d(cid:16) ¯IA Ω(cid:17) × X(m, j,p,q)∈I ( j + 2 cos ε)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)kF × X(m, j,p,q)∈I × X(m, j,p,q)∈I (2 − 2p + q)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)kF GMBR5 a8 = − 4π 5 da dt 1 a 2 n eq 2 (Rp, σ2,m,p,q)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) Qeff(σ2,m,p,q) (99) , hH2,m, j,p,q(e, I, ε)i2 hH2,m, j,p,q(e, I, ε)i2 hH2,m, j,p,q(e, I, ε)i2 , , (100) (101) 1 e de dt = − d (cos I) dt 16 eq 1 1 n 4π 5 1 − e2 e2 Qeff(σ2,m,p,q) GMBR5 a8 × X(m, j,p,q)∈I "(2 − 2p) 1 − × (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)kF 2 (Rp, σ2,m,p,q)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) √1 − e2 √1 − e2! + q# hH2,m, j,p,q(e, I, ε)i2 × X(m, j,p,q)∈I(cid:2) j + (2q − 2) cos I(cid:3) × (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)kF 2 (Rp, σ2,m,p,q)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) hH2,m, j,p,q(e, I, ε)i2 BR5 GM2 eq a8 Qeff(σ2,m,p,q) 4π 5 1 n 1 = , (102) , (103) that we need more constraints on the system formation by core accretion (Pollack et al. 1996) and differenciation resulting from the internal structure evolution (Nettelmann 2011). Furthermore, seismology seems to offer an interesting way to improve our knowledge of giant planets interiors (Gaulme et al. 2011). To conclude, the purpose of this paper was to study tidal dissi- pation in the solid parts of a simple model of two-layer planet; we show how this mechanism may be powerful. The results de- rived here are general in the sense that no specific rheological model has been assumed. However, considering the lack of con- straints on the rheology of giant planets cores, we have chosen the simplest Maxwell model to illustrate the tidal dissipation. This work represents thus a first step for further numerical inves- tigations in more realistic cases. Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to the referee for his/her remarks and suggestions. They also thank G. Tobie for fruitful discussions during this work and T. Guillot for providing numerical models of Jupiter and Saturn interiors. This work was supported in part by the Programme National de Plan´etologie (CNRS/INSU), the EMERGENCE-UPMC project EME0911, and the CNRS pro- gramme Physique th´eorique et ses interfaces. References Alterman, Z., Jarosch, H., & Pekeris, C. L. 1959, Royal Society of London Proceedings Series A, 252, 80 Biot, M. A. 1954, Journal of Applied Physics, 25, 1385 Charnoz, S., Crida, A., Castillo-Rogez, J. C., et al. 2011, Icarus, 216, 535 Charette, M.A., & Smith, W.H.F. 2010, Oceanography, 104, 106 Chree, C. 1896, Cambridge Phil. Trans., 16, 14 Correia, A. C. M., Laskar, J., & de Surgy, O. N. 2003, Icarus, 163, 1 Correia, A. C. M., & Laskar, J. 2003, Icarus, 163, 24 Dahlen, F. A., Tromp, J., & Lay, T. 1999, Physics Today, 52, 61 Dermott, S. F. 1979, Icarus, 37, 310 Efroimsky, M., & Williams, J. G. 2009, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 104, 257 Ferraz-Mello, S., Rodriguez, A., & Hussmann, H. 2008, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 101, 171 Gaulme, P., Schmider, F.-X., Gay, J., Guillot, T., & Jacob, C. 2011, A&A, 531, A104 Gavrilov, S. V., & Zharkov, V. N. 1977, Icarus, 32, 443 Goodman, J., & Lackner, C. 2009, ApJ, 696, 2054 Greff-Lefftz, M., M´etivier, L., & Legros, H. 2005, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 93, 113 Guillot, T., Chabrier, G., Gautier, D., & Morel, P. 1995, ApJ, 450, 463 Guillot, T., & Morel, P. 1995, A&AS, 109, 109 Guillot, T. 1999, Planet. Space Sci., 47, 1183 Guillot, T. 2005, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 33, 493 Henning, W. G., O'Connell, R. J., & Sasselov, D. D. 2009, ApJ, 707, 1000 Hubbard, W. B., Dougherty, M. K., Gautier, D., & Jacobson, R. 2009, Saturn from Cassini-Huygens, 75 Karato, S.-I. 2011, Icarus, 212, 14 Kaula, W. M. 1962, AJ, 67, 300 Lainey, V., Arlot, J.-E., Karatekin, O., & van Hoolst, T. 2009, Nature, 459, 957 Lainey, V., Karatekin, O., Desmars, J., Charnoz, S., Arlot, J.-E., Emelyanov, N., Le Poncin-Lafitte, C., Mathis, S., Remus, F., Tobie, G., & Zahn, J.-P. 2012, submited to ApJ Lambeck, K. 1980, The Earth's Variable Rotation (Cambridge University Press) Love, A. E. H. 1911, Some Problems of Geodynamics (Cambridge University Press) Mathis, S., & Le Poncin-Lafitte, C. 2009, A&A, 497, 889 Mathis, S., & Zahn, J.-P. 2005, A&A, 440, 653 Melchior, P. 1966, The Earth Tides (Pergamon, New York) Militzer, B., Hubbard, W. B., Vorberger, J., Tamblyn, I., & Bonev, S. A. 2008, ApJ, 688, L45 Militzer, B., & Hubbard, W. B. 2009, Ap&SS, 322, 129 Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 2000, Solar System Dynamics (Cambridge University Press) Nettelmann, N., Holst, B., Kietzmann, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 683, 1217 Nettelmann, N. 2011, Ap&SS, 336, 47 Ogilvie, G. I., & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ, 610, 477 Ogilvie, G. I., & Lin, D. N. C. 2007, ApJ, 661, 1180 Ogilvie, G. I. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 794 Peale, S.J., & Cassen, P. 1978, Icarus, 36, 245 Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62 Remus, F., Mathis, S. & Zahn, J.-P. 2012, submited to A&A Rieutord, M. 1987, Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 39, 163 Ross, M., & Schubert, G. 1986, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings, 16, 447 Santos, N. C., & et al. 2007, JENAM-2007, "Our Non-Stable Universe" Saumon, D., & Guillot, T. 2004, ApJ, 609, 1170 Takeuchi, H., and M. Saito 1972, Seismic surface waves, Methods Comput. Phys., 11, 217295 Thomson, W. (Lord Kelvin) 1863, Dynamical problems regarding elastic spheroidal shells, and On the rigidity of the Earth, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 153, 573-616. Tobie, G. 2003, Impact du chauffage de mar´ee sur l'´evolution g´eodynamique d'Europe et de Titan, PhD thesis, Universit´e Paris 7 - Denis Diderot Tobie, G., Mocquet, A., & Sotin, C. 2005, Icarus, 177, 534 Wu, Y. 2005, ApJ, 635, 688 Yoder, C. F. 1995, Icarus, 117, 250 Zahn, J.-P. 1966a, Annales d'Astrophysique, 29, 313 Zahn, J. P. 1966b, Annales d'Astrophysique, 29, 489 Zahn, J.-P. 1977, A&A, 57, 383 Appendix: elastic system In Sect. 2.3 we gave the system of equations (11), with its bound- ary conditions (12), governing an elastic planet under tidal per- turbation. Considering that such perturbations are of small order of magnitude compared to the hydrostatic equilibrium, we pro- posed in Sect. 2.4 a method to linearize the system (14). Thus, assuming the expansion (18) of all quantities in spherical har- monics, we obtain the following system of equations governing the scalar radial parts of these expansions (Alterman et al. 1959; Takeuchi & Saito 1972): ym 2 + 3 µ ym 3 r 3 µ 4µK K + 4 6(cid:16)K − 2 3 µ(cid:17) (cid:16)K + 4 3 µ(cid:17) r ym 4 r − ρ0ym 6 , ym 2 r ym 1 r − ym 3 r + 6 ym ym 6µK 12µK + ym 1 r + K + 4 3 µ r R ym 1 = − 1 K + 4 r R − ym 3 r 2(cid:16)K − 2 3 µ(cid:17) 3 µ(cid:17) r 2 =−4 ρ0 gs (cid:16)K + 4 3 µ(cid:17) r + 6ρ0 gs (cid:16)K + 4 4 =ρ0 gs 3 µ(cid:17) r (cid:16)K + 4 2µh11(cid:16)K − 2 3 µ(cid:17) + 10 µi (cid:16)K + 4 3 µ(cid:17) r ym 5 r − 2 5 =4πGρ0ym ym ym 6 = − 24πGρ0 1 + ym 6 , ym 3 r ym 3 = − r R − ym 4 µ , ym 1 r + 6 r ym 1 r + + 6µK + ym 3 r , ym 6 r . Solutions of (109) are given by (19). , (109a) (109b) (109c) (109d) (109e) (109f) 17
1307.7517	1	1307	2013-07-29T09:47:53	Physical Properties of Asteroid (308635) 2005 YU55 derived from multi-instrument infrared observations during a very close Earth-Approach	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The near-Earth asteroid (308635) 2005 YU55 is a potentially hazardous asteroid which was discovered in 2005 and passed Earth on November 8th 2011 at 0.85 lunar distances. This was the closest known approach by an asteroid of several hundred metre diameter since 1976 when a similar size object passed at 0.5 lunar distances. We observed 2005 YU55 from ground with a recently developed mid-IR camera (miniTAO/MAX38) in N- and Q-band and with the Submillimeter Array (SMA) at 1.3 mm. In addition, we obtained space observations with Herschel/PACS at 70, 100, and 160 micron. Our thermal measurements cover a wide range of wavelengths from 8.9 micron to 1.3 mm and were taken after opposition at phase angles between -97 deg and -18 deg. We performed a radiometric analysis via a thermophysical model and combined our derived properties with results from radar, adaptive optics, lightcurve observations, speckle and auxiliary thermal data. We find that (308635) 2005 YU55 has an almost spherical shape with an effective diameter of 300 to 312 m and a geometric albedo pV of 0.055 to 0.075. Its spin-axis is oriented towards celestial directions (lam_ecl, beta_ecl) = (60 deg +/- 30deg, -60 deg +/- 15 deg), which means it has a retrograde sense of rotation. The analysis of all available data combined revealed a discrepancy with the radar-derived size. Our radiometric analysis of the thermal data together with the problem to find a unique rotation period might be connected to a non-principal axis rotation. A low to intermediate level of surface roughness (r.m.s. of surface slopes in the range 0.1 - 0.3) is required to explain the available thermal measurements. We found a thermal inertia in the range 350-800 Jm^-2s^-0.5K^-1, very similar to the rubble-pile asteroid (25143) Itokawa and indicating a mixture of low conductivity fine regolith with larger rocks and boulders of high thermal inertia on the surface.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy&Astrophysicsmanuscript no. nea2005YU55astroph June 30, 2018 c(cid:13) ESO 2018 Physical Properties of Asteroid (308635) 2005 YU55 derived from multi-instrument infrared observations during a very close Earth-Approach T. G. Muller1, T. Miyata2, C. Kiss3 M. A. Gurwell4 S. Hasegawa5, E. Vilenius1, S. Sako2, T. Kamizuka2, T. Nakamura6, K. Asano2, M. Uchiyama2, M. Konishi2, M. Yoneda7, T. Ootsubo8, F. Usui5, Y. Yoshii2, M. Kidger9, B. Altieri9, R. Lorente9, A. P´al3, L. O'Rourke9, and L. Metcalfe9 1 Max-Planck-Institut fur extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstrasse, Postfach 1312, 85741 Garching, Germany 2 Institute of Astronomy, School of Science, the University of Tokyo, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan e-mail: [email protected] H-1121 Budapest, Hungary 3 Konkoly Observatory, Research Center for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences; Konkoly Thege 15-17, 4 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 5 Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 6 Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, 7 Planetary Plasma and Atmospheric Research Center, Tohoku University, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Japan 8 Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Japan 9 European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC), European Space Agency, Apartado de Correos 78, 28691 Villanueva de la Canada, 229-8510, Japan Japan Madrid, Spain Received ; accepted ABSTRACT The near-Earth asteroid (308635) 2005 YU55 is a potentially hazardous asteroid which was discovered in 2005 and passed Earth on November 8th 2011 at 0.85 lunar distances. This was the closest known approach by an asteroid of several hundred metre diameter since 1976 when a similar size object passed at 0.5 lunar distances. We observed 2005 YU55 from ground with a recently developed mid-IR camera (miniTAO/MAX38) in N- and Q-band and with the Submillimeter Array (SMA) at 1.3 mm. In addition, we obtained space observations with Herschel⋆/PACS at 70, 100, and 160 µm. Our thermal measurements cover a wide range of wavelengths from 8.9 µm to 1.3 mm and were taken after opposition at phase angles between -97◦ and -18◦. We performed a radiometric analysis via a thermophysical model and combined our derived properties with results from radar, adaptive optics, lightcurve observations, speckle and auxiliary thermal data. We find that (308635) 2005 YU55 has an almost spherical shape with an effective diameter of 300 to 312 m and a geometric albedo pV of 0.055 to 0.075. Its spin-axis is oriented towards celestial directions (λecl, βecl) = (60◦ ± 30◦, -60◦ ± 15◦), which means it has a retrograde sense of rotation. The analysis of all available data combined revealed a discrepancy with the radar-derived size. Our radiometric analysis of the thermal data together with the problem to find a unique rotation period might be connected to a non-principal axis rotation. A low to intermediate level of surface roughness (r.m.s. of surface slopes in the range 0.1 - 0.3) is required to explain the available thermal measurements. We found a thermal inertia in the range 350-800 Jm−2s−0.5K−1, very similar to the rubble-pile asteroid (25143) Itokawa and indicating a mixture of low conductivity fine regolith with larger rocks and boulders of high thermal inertia on the surface. Key words. Minor planets, asteroids: individual -- Radiation mechanisms: Thermal -- Techniques: photometric -- Infrared: planetary systems 1. Introduction The Apollo- and C-type asteroid (308635) 2005 YU55 is on a Mars-Earth-Venus crossing orbit1 (Vodniza & Pereira 2010; Hicks et al. 2010; Somers et al. 2010). Arecibo radar measure- ments in April 2010 have shown that 2005 YU55 is a very dark, ⋆ Herschel is an ESA space observatory with science instruments provided by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with im- portant participation from NASA. 1 2005, M.P.E.C. 2005-Y47: nearly spherical object2. They estimated a diameter of about 400 m, in contradiction to earlier calculations based on the V- magnitude in combination with a low albedo which led to a di- ameter of only 250 m. 2005 YU55 had a very close Earth approach in November 2011 when it passed within 0.85 lunar distances (0.85 LD) of the Earth. Later, in January 2029, the asteroid will pass about 0.0023 AU (equivalent to 0.89 LD) from Venus. This close en- counter with Venus will determine how close the object will pass 2 NASA Near Earth Object Program News: http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/mpec/K05/K05Y47.html http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news171.html 1 3 1 0 2 l u J 9 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 7 1 5 7 . 7 0 3 1 : v i X r a Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 the Earth in 2041 and 20453. The JPL Horizons system gives the absolute magnitude of 2005 YU55 as H=21.1 mag4. No other as- teroid with H<23 mag has been observed before to pass inside 1 LD. According to recent orbit simulations it does not pose any risk of an impact with Earth for the next 100 years5. The closest recorded approach by an asteroid of similar characteristics was that of 2004 XP14 (H=19.4 mag) to 1.1 LD on 2006 July 3, hence the encounter with 2005 YU55 was an exceptional event. The close Earth approach in November 2011 offered a sev- eral day observing opportunity from ground and also a brief (∼16 h) observing window for the Herschel Space Observatory located in the Lagrangian point L2 at about 1.5 Mio km from Earth. This was a unique opportunity to study a potentially haz- ardous asteroid (PHA) in great detail to derive physical and thermal properties which are needed to make long-term orbit predictions and to improve our knowledge on Apollo asteroids in general. We observed this near-Earth asteroid from ground at mid-Infrared N- and Q-band (miniTAO/MAX38 camera), at millimetre wavelength (Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Submillimeter Array, or SMA) and from space with Herschel- PACS at far-infrared wavelengths. We present our observations (Section 2), the thermophysical model (TPM) analysis (Section 3) and discuss the results (Section 4). In this work, we also con- sidered a set of auxiliary data (radar, optical, UV and thermal measurements) which were only available via unrefereed ab- stracts, astronomical circulars and telegrams. of the detector array is used for spectroscopy). The MAX38 ob- serving periods (2011-Nov-08 23:04 to Nov-09 01:51 UT and from Nov-09 23:56 to Nov-10 02:04 UT) covered the time of the closest approach (2011-Nov-08 23:24 UT) and about 24 hours later. The weather conditions were excellent through the ob- servations. Imaging observations in the 8.9 µm (∆λ ∼ 0.9 µm), 12.2 µm (0.5 µm), and 18.7 µm (0.9 µm) bands were carried out. α Tuc (IRAS22150-6030, HR 8502, HD 211416) was also ob- served after the observations of the asteroid as a flux standard. The absolute flux value of the standard star was obtained via the α Tuc template spectrum (Cohen et al. 1999). Since the distance to the asteroid from the Earth was very short, the asteroid had a very high apparent motion on the sky. We pointed the telescope at repeated intervals to follow the as- teroid's movement. The intervals were set to 1 minute and 3 min- utes on Nov. 8 and 9, respectively. Normal sidereal tracking was applied in the period between the telescope pointings. Images were taken at a frame rate of 3.8 Hz with an effective integration time of 0.197 sec. The frame rate is fast enough not to extend the image of the asteroid on each frame. Chopping technique6 was not applied because background can be canceled out with using frames just before or after an object frame. The observa- tion parameters are summarized in Table 1 and three examples of reduced images taken at the time of the closest approach are shown in Fig. 1. 2. Observations 2.1. Groundbasedmid-IRobservationswithMAX38 Table 1. MAX38 Observation Parameters. The first period in- cludes the closest Earth approach. 2011-Nov-.. (UT) Day Start End Filter Band # of frames airmass-range 2005 YU55 α Tuc 08 23:04 09 00:30 09 01:11 09 23:56 10 01:38 00:15 00:41 01:24 00:50 02:04 18.7 8.9 12.2 18.7 8.9 20196 2550 1734 12288 4928 1.31-1.47 1.51-1.55 1.65-1.70 2.00-1.61 1.43-1.38 1.41-1.48 1.29 1.31 1.53-1.64 1.67 On Nov. 8, the asteroid was so bright (observatory-centric distance was about 0.0021-0.0023AU) that it was detectable in each frame. Sky frames -composed by averaging 7 frames taken within 2 sec- were subtracted. This successfully canceled out sky variation similar to observations taken in chopping technique. Aperture photometry with an aperture radius of 3 arcsec was applied for each frame. Photometric values were determined by averaging frames taken in a period of 5 minutes. Errors were estimated as standard deviation of the photometric values. On Nov. 9 the asteroid was already at about 0.0084- 0.0089 AU distance and it was difficult to detect the asteroid on each frame. Here, we added 92 frames into one image by shifting the frames to compensate the asteroid's movement on the sky and subtracted the averaged sky frames. The frame-to- frame shifts were calculated from the ephemeris provided by the NASA Horizons web page7. The asteroid images in the co-added frames appeared nearly point-like and no noticeable extensions 6 the telescope's secondary mirror is oscillated between two positions on the sky at a frequency of a few Hz. 7 JPL Horizons: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi Fig. 1. Mid-infrared images of 2005 YU55 obtained by the mini- TAO/MAX38 camera in the 18.7 µm filter during the time of the closest Earth approach. North is up and west is right. The aster- oid moved from right (west) to left (east). We observed the asteroid 2005 YU55 in the period Nov. 8 - 10, 2011 with the mid-infrared camera MAX38 (Miyata et al. 2008; Nakamura et al. 2010; Asano et al. 2012) attached on the mini-TAO 1 meter telescope (Sako et al. 2008) which is located at 5640 m altitude on the summit of Co. Chajnantor in Chile, which is part of the University of Tokyo Atacama Observatory Project (PI: Yuzuru Yoshii; Yoshii et al. 2010). MAX38 has a 128×128 Si:Sb BIB detector with a pixel scale of 1.26 arcsec and a field of view of 2×2.5 arcmin determined by the rectan- gular field stop in the cold optics (the remaining 0.5×2.5 arcmin 3 http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroids/2005YU55/2005YU55 planning.html 4 JPL Horizons: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi 5 JPL's NEO Radar Detection Program Webpage: http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroids/index.html 2 Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 were detected. We applied aperture photometry on the final sky- subtracted images. The final flux and error values were again obtained by averaging all individual photometric values. In addition to the photometric error we also added a 5% ab- solute flux calibration error for the N-band data and a 7% error for the Q-band data based on the radiometric tolerance discus- sion in Cohen et al. (1999) and the information given in the stel- lar template. These errors also include possible colour-terms (es- timated to be below 2%) due to the different spectral shapes of the star and the asteroid in the N- and Q-band filters. In the first night (8/9 Nov.) α Tuc and the asteroid were observed at simi- lar airmass and similar PWV8-levels (based on APEX measure- ments) and no additional corrections were needed. In the second night (9/10 Nov.) 2005 YU55 was observed in Q-band at a large airmass close to 2.0 and a PWV of around 0.5 mm, while α Tuc was taken at an airmass of around 1.6 and a PWV-level of about 0.3 mm. Based on ATRAN model calculation of the atmospheric transmittance vs. PWV for the 18 µm filter we estimated that the derived Q-band flux for 2005 YU55 must be about 5-10% too low. We increased the derived 18.7 µm flux of the second night by 8% and gave a 10% absolute flux calibration error (instead of 7%) to compensate for the additional source of uncertainty. The final calibrated flux densities are given in Table 2. 2.2. Spacefar-infraredobservationswithHerschel-PACS The far-infrared observations with the Herschel space obser- vatory were reported by Muller et al. (2011b). 2005 YU55 crossed the entire visibility window (∼60◦ to ∼115◦ solar elon- gation) in about 16 hrs and its apparent motion was between 2.8 and 3.8 ◦/h, far outside the technical tracking limit of the satellite. Therefore, we performed two standard scan-map ob- servations of 240 s length each -one in the 70/160 µm (2011- Nov-10 14:52-14:56 UT, OBSID 1342232729) and one in the 100/160 µm filter combination (2011-Nov-10 14:57-15:01 UT, OBSID 1342232730)- at fixed times at pre-calculated positions on the sky. Each scan-map consisted of 4 scan-legs of 14 arcmin length and separated by 4 arcsec parallel to the apparent motion of the target and with a scan-speed of 20′′/s. During both scan- map observations 2005 YU55 crossed the observed field-of-view and the target was seen in each scan-leg. Figure 2 (top) shows the sky-projected image of the 70 µm band observations. The PACS photometer takes data frames with 40 Hz, but binned on- board by a factor of 4 before downlink. We re-centered/stacked all frames where the satellite was scanning with constant speed (about 1700 frames in each of the two dual-band measurements) on the expected position of 2005 YU55. The results are shown in Fig. 2 (bottom). This technique worked extremely well and one can clearly see many details of the tripod-dominated point- spread-function. We performed aperture photometry on the final calibrated images and estimated the flux error via photometry on artificially implemented sources in the clean vicinity around our target. The fluxes were finally corrected for colour terms to ob- tain monochromatic flux densities at the PACS reference wave- lengths. These corrections are due to the differences in spectral energy distribution between 2005 YU55 and the assumed con- stant energy spectrum ν Fν = const. in the PACS calibration scheme. The colour-corrections for objects in the temperature range of ≈ 250 - 400 K are 1.01, 1.03, 1.06 (± 0.01) in blue, green, red band respectively9. The photometric error of the ar- tificial sources were combined quadratically with the absolute flux calibration errors (5% in all 3 bands based on the model un- certainties of the fiducial stars used in the PACS photometer flux calibration scheme) and the error related to the colour-correction (1%). The final monochromatic flux densities and their absolute flux errors at the PACS reference wavelengths 70.0, 100.0 and 160.0 µm are listed in Table 3. Fig. 2. Top: Sky-projected PACS image of 2005 YU55 at 70 µm. Each of the 4 scan-legs has seen the target at a different position. Bottom: object-centered images of the target in the 3 filters: blue (70 µm), green (100 µm), red (160 µm). The tripod-dominated point-spread-function is clearly visible. 2.3. GroundbasedmillimeterobservationswiththeSMA We performed observations of 2005 YU55 a few hours past clos- est Earth approach on Nov. 9, 2011 using the Submillimeter Array (SMA) located near the summit of Mauna Kea in Hawaii. The SMA was operated in separated sideband mode with 2 GHz continuum bandwidth per sideband. The lower sideband was tuned to 220.596 GHz and the upper sideband (USB) at 230.596 GHz, providing a mean frequency of 225.596 GHz, or 1328.9 µm (covering the range from 1300.1 to 1359.0 µm). Complex gains were obtained from several different quasars as the asteroid moved across the sky. The amplitude scale was corrected for Earth atmospheric opacity through standard sys- tem temperature calibration, and then corrected to the abso- lute (Jansky) scale by referencing to observations of Uranus and Callisto, astronomical sources with flux densities known to within ∼5% at this frequency. The measurements were difficult due to poor weather, par- ticularly atmospheric phase stability, and were further hampered by the exceptionally rapid motion of the object. The asteroid's apparent position at its fastest changed by ∼7′′/s relative to side- real, which is significantly faster than the SMA phase tracking system (the digital delay software, or DDS) was designed for. To compensate, a special version of the DDS was created which at- tempted to track the phase on much shorter timescales. However, this was only partly successful and there were obvious signs of decorrelation (loss of signal caused by the motion of the source relative to the tracked phase center) on most baselines. This re- quired extensive data flagging and secondary self-calibration of the amplitude, which introduced significant systematic error in the flux density scale. 8 Precipitable Water Vapour: this is the main source of opacity at mid- infrared wavelengths. 9 PACS report PICC-ME-TN-038: http://herschel.esac.esa.int/twiki/pub/Public/PacsCalibrationWeb/cc report v1.pdf 3 Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 Table 2. Observing geometries (miniTAO-centric) and final calibrated flux densities. Negative phase angles: after opposition (object was trailing the Sun). An absolute flux calibration of 5% (N-band) and 7/10% (1st/2nd day Q-band) has been added. The second day Q-band data point has been corrected for airmass/PWV effects (see text). Julian Date mid-time λre f [µm] FD FDerr [Jy] [Jy] rhelio [AU] ∆obs [AU] α Observatory/ [deg] Instrument 2455874.46285 2455874.46632 2455874.46979 2455874.47326 2455874.47674 2455874.48021 2455874.48368 2455874.48715 2455874.49062 2455874.49410 2455874.49757 2455874.50104 2455874.50451 2455874.50799 2455874.51146 2455874.52187 2455874.52535 2455874.52882 2455874.54965 2455874.55312 2455874.55660 2455874.56007 2455874.56354 2455874.56701 2455874.57049 2455874.57396 2455874.57743 2455875.51458 2455875.57639 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 8.9 8.9 8.9 12.2 12.2 12.2 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 8.9 189.53 192.82 192.81 196.73 194.37 203.01 204.71 212.57 217.57 223.70 219.77 222.79 222.34 227.06 223.24 126.81 123.50 124.36 225.22 221.94 215.43 261.49 253.99 248.50 247.40 241.90 241.30 28.08 19.60 30.44 30.25 29.53 32.07 33.12 32.83 35.25 34.45 33.65 34.04 32.97 32.28 34.22 34.94 35.74 15.22 13.45 14.10 24.78 24.94 23.59 37.68 33.16 34.51 33.88 36.31 33.92 5.90 2.32 0.9904028 0.9904293 0.9904558 0.9904823 0.9905088 0.9905352 0.9905617 0.9905882 0.9906147 0.9906411 0.9906676 0.9906941 0.9907206 0.9907471 0.9907735 0.9908530 0.9908794 0.9909059 0.9910648 0.9910912 0.9911177 0.9911442 0.9911706 0.9911971 0.9912236 0.9912501 0.9912765 0.9983930 0.9988611 0.0021426484 0.0021415786 0.0021408565 0.0021404827 0.0021404572 0.0021407803 0.0021414518 0.0021424716 0.0021438391 0.0021455542 0.0021476157 0.0021500229 0.0021527749 0.0021558704 0.0021593083 0.0021716598 0.0021764507 0.0021815751 0.0022191984 0.0022265916 0.0022342979 0.0022423147 0.0022506389 0.0022592671 0.0022681963 0.0022774233 0.0022869445 0.0084376885 0.0089028990 -97.17 miniTAO/MAX38a -96.46 miniTAO/MAX38a -95.74 miniTAO/MAX38a -95.03 miniTAO/MAX38a -94.32 miniTAO/MAX38a -93.61 miniTAO/MAX38b -92.89 miniTAO/MAX38b -92.18 miniTAO/MAX38b -91.47 miniTAO/MAX38b -90.76 miniTAO/MAX38b -90.05 miniTAO/MAX38c -89.34 miniTAO/MAX38c -88.63 miniTAO/MAX38c -87.93 miniTAO/MAX38c -87.22 miniTAO/MAX38c -85.13 miniTAO/MAX38d -84.43 miniTAO/MAX38d -83.74 miniTAO/MAX38d -79.67 miniTAO/MAX38e -79.00 miniTAO/MAX38e -78.34 miniTAO/MAX38e -77.68 miniTAO/MAX38 f -77.03 miniTAO/MAX38 f -76.38 miniTAO/MAX38 f -75.74 miniTAO/MAX38 f -75.10 miniTAO/MAX38 f -74.47 miniTAO/MAX38 f -19.23 miniTAO/MAX38g -18.57 miniTAO/MAX38h Notes. (a,b,c,d,e, f ,g,h) for the χ2 analysis in Section 3 we used the mean fluxes of each group for calculation efficiency reasons. Table 3. Observing geometries (Herschel-centric) and final calibrated flux densities. Negative phase angles: after opposition. Julian Date mid-time 2455876.120565 2455876.120565 2455876.124075 2455876.124075 λre f [µm] 70.0 160.0 100.0 160.0 FD FDerr [Jy] [Jy] rhelio [AU] ∆obs [AU] α Observatory/ [deg] Instrument 12.35 2.55 6.87 2.66 0.63 0.13 0.35 0.14 1.002978 1.002978 1.003004 1.003004 0.005403 0.005403 0.005415 0.005415 -70.88 Herschel-PACS -70.88 Herschel-PACS -70.62 Herschel-PACS -70.62 Herschel-PACS Table 4. Observing geometries (SMA-centric) and final calibrated flux densities. Negative phase angles: after opposition. Julian Date mid-time λre f [µm] FD FDerr [Jy] [Jy] rhelio [AU] ∆obs [AU] α Observatory/ [deg] Instrument 2455874.95042 1328.9 0.075 0.020 0.9941165 0.0042883 -34.66 SMA/230 GHz receiver Despite these challenges, we obtained a clear detection of the object. Figure 3 shows the 1.3 mm image of 2005 YU55 af- ter both phase reference calibration and further self-calibration. The target itself was unresolved and the oblong image of the as- teroid in Figure 3 is simply due to the PSF10 of the instrument for the observations, which is shown in the lower left corner as 10 Point Spread Function 4 an ellipse of 3.73′′ × 2.58′′ in size, with a major axis position angle of 83.66◦ East of North. Over the 3.5 hours of observation (UT Nov 9, 2011 09.16 - 12.46 hrs) we further see the expected drop in flux density as the source recedes, consistent with the apparent size decrease with time. While the detection is of high signficance (SNR ∼35), the systematic problems of compensat- ing for the tracking-induced decorrelation along with the poor weather dominated the flux-density error budget. Taking all ef- Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 fects into account we obtained a flux density of 75 ± 25 mJy at observation mid-time (UT Nov 9, 2011 10:49, see Tbl. 4). Fig. 3. SMA image of 2005 YU55 at 1.3 mm. The ellipse repre- sents the 2-dimensional full width at half maximum of the syn- thesized beam of the array, which is effectively the PSF of the instrument for the observations of an unresolved target. 2.4. Auxiliarydatasets Radar measurements. Nolan et al. (2010), Busch et al. (2012) and Taylor et al. (2012a; 2012b) presented results obtained by radar measurements using the Arecibo S-band, the Deep Space Network Goldstone DSS-14 and DSS-13, Green Bank Telescope and Arecibo/VLBA (radar speckle tracking). They found 2005 YU55 to be a dark (at radar/radio wavelengths), spherical object of about 400 m diameter and a rotation period of roughly 18 hrs (Nolan et al. 2010; Taylor et al. 2012a). Busch et al. (2012) confirmed the nearly spheroidal shape and determined the maximum dimensions of the object to be 360 ± 40 m in all directions. The radar team estimated the pole direction from the motion of the radar speckle pattern during three days of observa- tions after the flyby. Combining the radar images and the speckle data excluded all prograde pole directions, and restricted the pos- sible retrograde poles to (λecl, βecl) = (20◦, -74◦) ± 20◦ with a rotation period of 19.0 ± 0.5 hrs and consistent with a principle- axis rotation. Thermal infrared observations from Gemini-North/Michelle. Lim et al. (2012a; 2012b) obtained thermal infrared photometry and spectroscopy in N- and Q-band using the Michelle instru- ment at Gemini-North. According to their thermal model analy- sis (Tss = 360 - 370 K; η ≈ 1.25-1.5) the thermal measurements are consistent with an object diameter of 400 m, but the best fit to their data was found for a size of 322 ± 18 m and a maxi- mum subsolar temperature Tss of 409 ± 12 K (thermal model η ≈ 0.93). More recently, Lim et al. (2012c) combined their ther- mal data with results from radar measurements and find now an equatorial diameter of 380 ± 20 m and a thermal inertia Γ ≈ 500 - 1500 Jm−2s−0.5K−1. They also calculated values for the effec- tive diameter via radiometric techniques and based only on their thermal data. They found an effective diameter of 310 m for a low thermal inertia of 350 Jm−2s−0.5K−1 and of 350 m for a ther- mal inertia of 1000 Jm−2s−0.5K−1 (DPS meeting #44, #305.01 presentation). Keck adaptive-optics (AO) imaging. Merline et al. (2011; 2012) reported on adaptive optics (AO) imaging of 2005 YU55 during its close fly-by on 2011 Nov 9 UT with the Keck II AO system NIRC2. The preliminary results were derived under the assumption of a smooth triaxial ellipsoid having a principle- axis rotation of 18 hr. They found a preference for poles in the southern sub-latitudes and an effective object diameter of 307 ± 15 m. This would be consistent with the radar-favoured ret- rograde sense of rotation meaning that the object presented a warm terminator during its close approach. In addition, they give two explicit solutions: (a) prograde pole with (λecl, βecl) = (339◦, +84◦) ± 6◦ and object dimensions of 337 × 324 × 267 m (± 15 m in each dimension), corresponding to a spherical equivalent di- ameter of 308 ± 9 m; (b) retrograde pole with (λecl, βecl) = (22◦, -35◦) ± 15◦ and object dimensions of 328 × 312 × 245 m (± 15, 15, 30 m) corresponding to a spherical equivalent diameter of 293 ± 14 m. VLT-NACO speckle imaging observations. Sridharan et al. (2012) performed VLT-NACO speckle imaging in Ks band in no-AO mode. The observations on 2005 YU55 were carried out one hour (10-min block) and two hours (15-min block) after the closest Earth approach, interleaved by sky background and cali- bration observations. The planned closed-loop AO observations failed due to poor observing conditions and only no-AO mode (speckle imaging mode) observations were possible. They found that 2005 YU55 has a spherical shape with a mean diameter of about 270 m. At the same time they extracted a mean diameter of 261±20 m × 310±30 m from edge-enhanced image reconstruc- tions. The large uncertainties are due to the theoretical resolution of 95 m at the distance of the object and the final image quality. CCD photometric observations. CCD lightcurve measure- ments from different observers were analysed by Warner et al. (2012a; 2012b). Their analysis resulted in two possible synodic periods of 16.34 ± 0.01 h with an amplitude of 0.24 ± 0.02 mag (9-17 Nov, 2011) and 19.31 ± 0.02 h with an amplitude of 0.20 ± 0.02 mag. The first one was apparently supported by the ini- tial radar analysis, while the second one is now the currently favoured solution by the radar team. The 19.31 h lightcurve has a bimodal shape and there seem to be indications for a non- principal axis rotation. Due to a large phase angle coverage of the CCD data they were also able to derive the absolute R-band magnitude HR = 20.887 ± 0.042 and the phase slope parameter G = -0.147 ± 0.014. With an assumed V-R value of 0.38 they calculated the absolute V-band magnitude HV = 21.27 ± 0.05. Absolute magnitude and phase curve. Based on Bessel R- band photometry and long-slit CCD spectrograms during the 2010 and 2011 apparitions, Hicks et al. (2010; 2011) reported an absolute R-band magnitude of HR = 20.73 and a phase slope parameter G = -0.12 describing a very steep phase curve which is typically found for low-albedo C- and P-type asteroids. They measured a V-R colour of 0.37 mag leading to an absolute V- band magnitude of HV = 21.1 ± 0.1. An indpendent work by 5 Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 Bodewits et al. (2011) presented a V-band absolute magnitude of HV = 21.2 when applying a phase curve derived from UV measurements (GUV = -0.13). Table 5. Summary of general TPM input parameters and applied ranges. 3. Thermophysical model analysis For the analysis of our thermal data (miniTAO/MAX38, SMA, Herschel/PACS) we applied a thermophysical model (TPM) which is based on the work by Lagerros (1996; 1997; 1998). This model is frequently and successfully applied to near-Earth asteroids (e.g., Muller et al. 2004; Muller et al. 2005; Muller et al. 2011a; Muller et al. 2012), to main-belt asteroids (e.g., Muller & Lagerros 1998; Muller & Blommaert 2004), and also to more distant objects (e.g. Horner et al. 2012; Lim et al. 2010). The TPM takes into account the true observing and illumination ge- ometry for each observational data point, a crucial aspect for the interpretation of our 2005 YU55 observations which cover a wide range of phase angles. The TPM allows to specify a shape model and spin-vector properties. The heat conduction into the surface is controlled by the thermal inertia Γ. The observed mid- and far- IR fluxes are connected to the hottest regions on the asteroid sur- face and dominated by the diurnal heat wave. The seasonal heat wave is less important and therefore not considered here. The infrared beaming effects are calculated via a surface roughness model, described by segments of hemispherical craters. Here, mutual heating is included and the true crater illumination and the visibility of shadows is considered. The level of roughness is driven by the r.m.s. of the surface slopes which correspond to a given crater depth-to-radius value combined with the frac- tion of the surface covered by craters, see also Lagerros (1996) for further details. We used a constant emissivity of 0.9 at all wavelengths, knowing that the emissivity can decrease beyond ∼200 µm in some cases (e.g., Muller & Lagerros 1998; 2002). All of our data -except the SMA data point which has a large errorbar- have been taken at wavelength <200 µm and the con- stant emissivity is therefore a valid assumption. The TPM input parameters and applied variations are listed in Table. 5. 3.1. Usingasphericalshapemodel We started our analysis with a spherical shape model to see which spin-axis orientations, sizes, geometric albedos, and ther- mal properties produce acceptable solutions with reduced χ2- values11 around or below 1.0. For the spin-axis solutions we used all values specified in literature and many additional orientations to cover the entire λecl-βecl space. For the calculation of the re- duced χ2-curves we consider the true observing and illumina- tion constellation (helio-centric and observer-centric distances, phase angle, spin-axis orientation) for each epoch and then we compare with the corresponding measurement. These calcula- tions are done for a wide range of thermal inertias and different levels of surface roughness as specified in Table 5. An exam- ple for the application of this technique can be found in Muller et al. (2011a). Each model setup produces a curve of reduced χ2-values as a function of thermal inertia. Figure 4 shows these curves for all different spin-axis orientation, a rotation period of 19.31 h and an intermediate level of surface roughness (r.m.s. of surface slopes of 0.3). Reduced χ2-values around or below 1.0 correspond to TPM solutions which explain all observed fluxes 11 reduced χ2-values were calculated via χ2 reduced = 1/(N-ν) P ((obs- mod)/err)2, with ν being the number of free degrees of freedom; here ν=2 since we solve for diameter and thermal inertia; obs is the observed and mod the model flux, err the absolute photometric error. 6 Param. Value/Range Remarks Γ ρ f ǫ HV-mag. G-slope shape Psid [h] spin-axis (λecl,βecl) 0...3000 0.1...0.8 0.6a 0.9b 21.2 ± 0.15 mag -0.13 ± 0.02 spherical/ellipsoidal 16.34 h; 19.31 h J m−2 s−0.5 K−1, thermal inertia (25 values spread in log-space) r.m.s. of surface slopes, steps of 0.1 surface frac. covered by craters λ-independent emissivity average of published values average of published values info from radar and AO Warner et al. (2012a; 2012b) (20.0◦, -74.0◦) ± 20◦ (339.0◦, +84.0◦) ± 6◦ Merline et al. (2011; 2012) (22.0◦, -35.0◦) ± 15◦ Merline et al. (2011; 2012) Busch et al. (2012) (309.3◦, +89.5◦)c (129.3◦, -89.5◦)d (337.2◦, -13.9◦) (157.2◦, +13.9◦) (273.0◦, +1.7◦) (93.0◦, -1.7◦) (337.2◦, +76.1◦) (157.2◦, -76.1◦) (273.0◦, -88.3◦) (93.0◦, +88.3◦) (0/90/180/270◦, ±60◦) (0/90/180/270◦, ±30◦) (0/90/180/270◦ , 0◦) obliquity 0◦ (prograde) obliquity 180◦ (retrograde) pole-on case1 for Herschel obs. pole-on case2 for Herschel obs. pole-on case1 for TAO/MAX38 pole-on case2 for TAO/MAX38 equ.-on case1 for Herschel obs. equ.-on case2 for Herschel obs. equ.-on case1 for TAO/MAX38 equ.-on case2 for TAO/MAX38 intermediate orientations intermediate orientations pole in ecliptic plane Notes. (a) see Lagerros 1998 section 3.3; (b) see text for further details; (c) spin-axis orientation close to ecliptic north pole; (d) spin-axis orien- tation close to ecliptic south pole in a statistically acceptable way. There are several spin-axis ori- entations which produce an excellent match to all our thermal measurements at thermal inertia values in the range between ap- proximately 200 and 1500 Jm−2s−0.5K−1. The distribution of the reduced χ2-minima along the ecliptic longitudes and latitudes is shown in Figure 5. There are large zones in the λecl.-βecl-space which can be excluded with high probability (light blue, green, yellow, red zones), but there re- main several possible spin-axis orientations compatible with our dataset (dark blue zones), including the radar and AO solutions. Both figures (Figs. 4 & 5) have a slight dependency on the selected surface roughness (for both figures we have used r.m.s. of surface slopes of 0.3). In general, lower roughness (r.m.s. of surface slopes at 0.1) produces lower χ2-minima and at smaller thermal inertia values going down to about 200 Jm−2s−0.5K−1. Higher values for the surface roughness (r.m.s. of surface slopes of ≥0.5) shift the χ2-minima to values well above 1.0 and towards higher thermal inertia going up to about 1500 Jm−2s−0.5K−1. It is interesting to note that the pro- grade AO solution (solid line in Fig. 4) works very well (χ2- minima very close to 1.0) for a low surface roughness, while the radar solution produces a better match in case of a high surface roughness. 3.2. Influenceofthespin-axisorientation As a next step, we investigate the influence of different spin-axis orientations on the size and albedo solutions. We determined the Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 derived thermal inertias change significantly with roughness at similar χ2-values, indicating that we cannot resolve the degen- eracy between roughness and thermal inertia with our dataset. A smoother surface is connected to lower values for the thermal inertia, the rougher surfaces require higher thermal inertias. Fig. 4. Calculation of reduced χ2-values for all specified spin- axis orientations, a fixed rotation period of 19.31 h and an in- termediate surface roughness level (r.m.s. of surface slopes of 0.3). The prograde AO solution (solid line) and the radar solu- tion (dashed line) for the spin-vector are indicated in the figure. ] g e d [ e d u t i t a l c i t p i l c E 80 60 40 20 0 −20 −40 −60 −80 0 50 100 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 250 300 350 150 200 Ecliptic longitude [deg] Fig. 5. The χ2-minima calculated for all spin-axis orientations listed in Table 5 and for an intermediate level of roughness (r.m.s.slope 0.3). The dark blue zones indicate spin-poles which allow us to obtain an acceptable match to all thermal data simul- taneously (reduced χ2-values around or below 1.0). The radar and both AO solutions are indicated by the crossed circles. Note that the size, albedo and thermal inertia are free parameters and only the best possible solution for each spin-axis has been con- sidered. χ2-minima for all listed spin-axis orientations and for four dif- ferent levels of roughness (r.m.s. of surface slopes at 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 0.8). Figure 6 shows how the corresponding radiometric sizes and geometric albedos are distributed in the reduced χ2- picture. We connected the four χ2-minima belonging to the AO- solution (solid line) and the ones belonging to the radar solution (dashed line) in Fig. 6. These lines show that the connected size and albedo values remain stable, just the fit gets better (lower χ2- minima) for specific roughness settings. We also found that the Fig. 6. The distribution of the χ2-minima and the related effective diameter (top) and geometric albedos (bottom). The four differ- ent levels of roughness are indicated by different symbols. The values for the prograde AO solution (solid line) and the radar solution (dashed line) are connected in the figures. The thermal data are compatible with different spin-axis ori- entations, but the size, the geometric albedo and also the pos- sible thermal inertias are very well constrained by our thermal dataset. The best solutions are found for an effective diameter of about 310 m, if we include the best solutions for the prograde AO spin-axis and the radar spin-axis orientations, then the possi- ble diameter range goes from 295 to 335 m (see Fig. 6, top). For the geometric albedo we find a value of about 0.062 and a possi- ble range between 0.053 to 0.067 (see Fig. 6, bottom). Figure 7 shows how our best TPM solution translates the insolation dur- ing the epoch of the Herschel measurement into a thermal pic- ture of the surface as seen from Herschel. For the calculations we used a spin-axis orientation of (λecl, βecl) = (60◦, -60◦) and a spherical shape model with a total of 800 facets. The large in- fluence of the thermal inertia in combination with the object's 7 Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 rotation is the reason for the warm temperatures also in regions without direct illumination. 4. Discussions 4.1. Comparisonwiththeradarresults Insolation [W/m2] Temperature [K] 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Fig. 7. TPM picture of 2005 YU55 as seen from Herschel on 2011-Nov-10 14:55 UT in the object-centered reference frame (z-axis along the object's rotation axis) and with the Sun at a phase angle of -71◦, spin-axis orientation: (λecl, βecl) = (60◦, - 60◦), spherical shape model with a total of 800 facets. Top: inso- lation in W/m2. Bottom: temperature in K. 8 The comparison between the radar results (Busch et al. 2012) and our findings is very interesting. If we use the radar diame- ter (360 ± 40 m, close to a spheroidal shape) and the spin-axis properties ([λecl, βecl] = [20◦, -74◦] ± 20◦, Psid = 19.0 ± 0.5 h) it is not possible to find an acceptable match to our thermal mea- surements. The reduced χ2-minima stay always well above 2.0 and the match between TPM-predictions and observed fluxes is very poor. Even for the lowest diameter limit of 320 m the model calculations would exceed the measured fluxes systematically by 15-25%. At a diameter of 360 m the model fluxes are already 30- 40% above the measurements. The radar size estimates are -as the radiometric size estimates- model dependent. The spin-axis orientation as well as the rotation rate have a larger influence on the radar solution (e.g., Ostro et al. 2002) than they have on the radiometric solution. The radar images are dominated by the sur- face part which is closest to the antenna while the thermal data are tidely connected to the entire cross-section at the moment of observation. This might explain the differences between both techniques. However, we do find an acceptable match to all thermal data if we just use the radar spin-properties combined with a high level of surface roughness (r.m.s. of surface slopes of 0.8). But the corresponding diameter is only 299 m -well outside the radar derived range- with a pV =0.067 and a thermal inertia of 400 Jm−2s−0.5K−1. In fact, all high obliquity cases with βecl ≤ - 60◦ (retrograde sense of rotation) produce small diameters in the range 300-310 m, while only the low obliquity cases with βecl ≥ +60◦ (prograde sense of rotation) produce larger effective diam- eters of 325-340 m. 4.2. ComparisonwithAOandspeckleresults The Keck AO results presented by Merline et al. (2012) compare better with our findings. Table 6 summarises the AO and our radiometric results. Table 6. Comparison between AO results and our findings. sense of rotation prograde retrograde retrograde spin-axis (λecl, βecl) AO-size [m] 339◦, +84◦ 22◦, -35◦ southern poles 337×324×267 328×312×245 AO Dequ [m] 308 ± 9 293 ± 14 307 ± 15 TPM-Dequ [m] 333 299a 300-310b Notes. (a) this solution requires an unacceptably high thermal inertia of well above 2000 Jm−2s−0.5K−1; (b) diameter range of all high obliquity cases βecl ≤ -60◦ The southern rotational poles are not specified in detail by Merline et al. (2012), but here we see for the first time an agree- ment between the derived sizes. The originally specified retro- grade pole towards an ecliptic latitude of -35◦ is very unlikely: acceptable TPM solutions (with reduced χ2-minima below 2.0) are only found if the thermal inertia would be well above 2000 Jm−2s−0.5K−1, an unrealistically high value which has never been measured before. It should be noted here that the highest Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 derived thermal inertias are still below 1000 Jm−2s−0.5K−1 (e.g., Delbo et al. 2007) and that our mid- to far-IR data originate in the top layer on the surface. We don't see any signatures of sub- surface layers where the thermal inertia could be significantly higher (Keihm et al. 2012). The speckle observation in no-AO mode presented by Sridharan et al. (2012) revealed a roughly spheroidal shape with a mean diameter of 270 m. By using a more sophisticated re- construction technique they estimated a mean diameter of 261 ± 20 m × 310 ± 30 m, corresponding to an object-averaged size of approximately 285 ± 25 m. Within the errorbars, this value agrees with our radiometrically derived diameter of 300-310 m and it also creates doubts if the large radar size is realistic. The indications for a diameter close to 300 m makes also the various prograde solutions more unlikely, which all require diameters in the range 325-340 m. 4.3. Spin-axisproperties Combining the spin-axis information given by Busch et al. (2012), Merline et al. (2012) and our findings (see Fig. 4), our analysis supports a retrograde sense of rotation with a possible spin-axis orientation of (λecl, βecl) = (60◦ ± 30◦, -60◦ ± 15◦). The relatively large errors in (λecl, βecl) are covering also the possible solutions connected to the different roughness levels mentioned before. If we use this solution, then the size estimate from AO observations matches our radiometrically derived optimal size and we also have an agreement with the radar derived spin-pole. The discrepancy with the radar size remains. Our thermal observations cover a wide range of phase an- gles, wavelengths and different illumination and observing ge- ometries. This allowed us to exclude many spin-axis orientations (see Fig. 5). Nevertheless, we could not find a strong prefer- ence for a single spin-axis orientation nor for the sense of ro- tation. Even very extreme solutions like the retrograde radar so- lution and the prograde AO solution seem to explain the data equally well. This is very surprising. Based on our previous modeling experiences for 1999 JU3 (Muller et al. 2011a) and 1999 RQ36 (Muller et al. 2012) based on much smaller sets of thermal data, we expected to find a unique spin-axis solution. But this might be an indication that 2005 YU55 is a tumbler with a strongly time-dependent orientation of the spin-axis (for fur- ther details on tumbling asteroids see Pravec et al. 2005). Busch et al. (2012) speculated already about the possibility that ter- restrial tides might have torqued the object into a non-principal axis spin state. However, their observations are consistent with a principle-axis rotation. Warner et al. (2012b) found two, non- commensurate solutions for the rotation period (16.34 ± 0.01 h; 19.31 ± 0.02 h) which they could not fully explain. They suggest that a non-principal axis rotation should be considered. After the radar and lightcurve analysis, the thermal analysis is now also pointing towards the possibility of a non-principle axis rotation. We also looked into the influence of the two published rota- tion periods. But the ≈3 h difference between the two available periods did not affect our radiometric solutions significantly. The longer rotation period is typically requiring slightly higher inertias to produce the same disk-integrated flux, but this is a marginal effect here in this case. 4.4. Comparisonwithotherthermalmeasurements Instead of comparing our TPM radiometric results with the pre- liminary results produced by Lim et al. (2012a; 2012b; 2012c) via a simple thermal model, we predicted flux densities for the epochs and the wavelength bands of the Michelle/Gemini North observations shown in Figure 2 in Lim et al. (2012b). For the TPM prediction we simply used our best effective diame- ter (310 m) and albedo (pV = 0.062) solution connected to our preferred spin-axis orientation of (λecl, βecl) = (60◦, -60◦). The thermal inertia and roughness levels are less well constrained and our dataset does not allow to break the degeneracy between these two parameters. A low roughness (r.m.s. of surface slopes = 0.1) combined with small values of the thermal inertia of about 200 Jm−2s−0.5K−1 would explain our measurements as well as higher roughness levels (r.m.s. of surface slopes = 0.5) com- bined with higher thermal inertia around 800 Jm−2s−0.5K−1. We selected an intermediate solution (r.m.s. of surface slopes = 0.3; thermal inertia = 500 Jm−2s−0.5K−1). The Gemini-North/Michelle photometry shown in the Figure 2 in Lim et al. (2012b) was taken on 09-Nov-2011 11:02- 11:15 UT (α = -34.0◦, r = 0.994 AU, ∆ = 0.004 AU) and on 10-Nov-2011 09:32 - 11:52 UT (α = -15.5◦, r = 1.001 AU, ∆ = 0.012 AU). Since the calibrated flux densities and errors are not explicitly given, we only could do a qualitative compari- son. Table 7 shows our TPM prediction for both epochs and the Michelle reference wavelengths in Jansky and W/m2/µm. Table 7. TPM flux predictions for the Michelle bands and both observing epochs. Wavelength λc [µm] 09-Nov-2011 11:08UT [W/m2/µm] [Jy] 10-Nov-2011 10:50UT [Jy] [W/m2/µm] 7.9 8.8 9.7 10.3 11.6 12.5 18.5 69.2 83.7 95.3 101.5 110.8 114.6 109.2 3.3e-12 3.2e-12 3.0e-12 2.9e-12 2.5e-12 2.2e-12 1.0e-12 10.6 12.9 14.7 15.6 17.0 17.6 16.6 5.1e-13 5.0e-13 4.7e-13 4.4e-13 3.8e-13 3.4e-13 1.5e-13 Our TPM-predictions agree very well with the observed fluxes and errorbars presented in Lim et al. (2012b). For the first epoch we estimated that the agreement is within about 10% at all wavelengths, while for the second epoch the TPM prediction seems to be about 5-15% below the observed fluxes. We also tested the low-roughness/low-inertia case mentioned before and indeed it produces very similar fluxes and the agree- ment is on a similar level. The high-roughness/high-inertia case is less convincing, the TPM predictions are systematically low by 5-20%. The Michelle/Gemini North data favour a thermal in- ertia value in the range 200-700 Jm−2s−0.5K−1, combined with an intermediate to low roughness level (r.m.s. of surface slopes 0.1-0.5), also in agreement with the lowest reduced χ2-values in Fig. 4. 4.5. Overallfittothemeasurements We tested the quality of the final solution for 2005 YU55 against the observed and calibrated flux densities by calculating the TPM predictions for each of data point listed in Tables 2, 3, and 4. The observed and calibrated mono-chromatic flux den- sities are shown in Fig. 8 together with the TPM predictions 9 Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 for the specific observing geometries. The observation/TPM ra- tios are very sensitive to wavelength-dependent effects (related surface roughness and thermal inertia), phase-angle dependent effects (a wrong thermal inertia would cause before/after oppo- sition asymmetries), and shape effects (ratios as a function of rotational phase). An overall ratio close to 1.0 indicates that the size and thermal properties (and in second order also albedo) are correctly estimated. Figure 9 shows how well our final TPM so- lution explains our thermal data covering a wide range of wave- lengths from 8.9 µm to 1.3 mm and taken at very different phase angles ranging from -97◦ to -18◦. No trends with wavelength nor with phase angle can be seen. Fig. 8. Observered and calibrated flux densities together with the corresponding TPM prediction. The model predictions for the MAX38 data are shown at the start and end time of each observ- ing day. The distance between observer and target and also the phase angle were rapidly changing during the close encounter period of three days. For the PACS data the model prediction from 5 to 1500 µm is shown. Figure 9 also shows that 2005 YU55 must be close to a sphere. An elongated or strangely shaped body would produce a thermal lightcurve, but our dataset does not show any signifi- cant deviations at specific rotational phases (bottom figure). But not all rotational phases have been covered by our thermal mea- surements and some of the observational errors are large. There is also the possibility that effects of an ellipsoidal shape could have been compensated by roughness effects (a larger cross- section combined with a low surface roughness could produce the same flux levels as a smaller cross-section combined with high surface roughness). Figure 9 (bottom) would then also show a constant ratio at all rotational phases. But since the roughness influences the flux in a wavelength-dependent manner (see e.g., Muller 2002, Fig. 3), one should then see a larger scatter in Fig. 9 (top) at short wavelengths where the roughness has the great- est influence on the observed fluxes. At long wavelengths (be- yond ∼20 µm) the effects of roughness are much smaller and the shape effects are dominating. Shape effects or combined shape/roughness variations are not seen in our dataset. We did also an additional test to see if the optical lightcurve amplitude of 0.20 ± 0.02 mag (Warner et al. 2012a; 2012b) is compatible with our findings. Such an amplitude would mean that the flux at lightcurve maximum is about 1.2 times the flux at lightcurve minimum, which would require a SNR>10 time series 10 Fig. 9. Observered and calibrated flux densities divided by the corresponding TPM prediction. Top: as a function of wave- length. Middle: as a function of phase angle. Bottom: as a func- tion of rotational phase. Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 data set for confirmation. The PACS data are of sufficient qual- ity, but they are taken at a single epoch. The miniTAO/MAX38 measurements have too large error bars, related mainly to sys- tematic errors in the absolute flux calibration scheme. However, we looked at the relative variation of the 22 miniTAO/MAX38 data points taken at 18.7 µm with respect to the spherical shape model flux predictions. The deviations never exceed 10%, but these data cover only a very limited range of rotational phases (from 195 to 245◦ and a single point at 305◦ in the bottom of figure 9). The thermal data are therefore perfectly compatible with the optical lightcurve results and there are not indications for large deviations from a spherical shape. 4.6. Errorcalculations We combine the constraints from the radar measurements (retro- grade sense of rotation, estimate of spin-axis orientation), the AO findings (effective diameter of 307 ± 15 m for "southern poles"), and the speckle technique (object-averaged diameter of 285 ± 25 m) with the χ2 analysis for the possible spin-axis ori- entations (see Figs. 4, 5 and corresponding figures for different roughness levels which are not shown here). For a good fit the reduced χ2-values should be close to 1 and we estimated for our dataset that the 3-σ confidence level for the reduced χ2 is around 1.6. This lead to an estimated spin-axis orientation of (λecl, βecl) = (60◦ ± 30◦, -60◦ ± 15◦). We can use the 3-σ threshold in reduced χ2 also for the derivation of the corresponding size and albedo range. Figure 10 shows the size and albedo solutions for the full range of ther- mal inertias (from 0 to 3000 J m−2 s−0.5 K−1), the four different levels of roughness (r.m.s.-slopes of 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, shown with different symbols) and for all spin-axis solutions compat- ible with (λecl, βecl) = (60◦ ± 30◦, -60◦ ± 15◦). Based on the 3-σ confidence level we derived a possible diameter range of 295 to 322 m, 0.057 to 0.068 for the geometric albedo, and a thermal inertia larger than 150 J m−2 s−0.5 K−1. As a second step we looked in more details at the derived size, albedo and thermal inertia ranges. The solutions close to the 3-σ threshold in our χ2-analysis are very problematic in the sense that they produce strong trends in the observation/model figures (see Fig. 9) either with wavelengths and/or with phase angle. These kind of trends are very difficult to catch in an auto- matic χ2-analysis. We therefore moved back to the 1-σ solutions, corresponding to a possible diameter range of 300-312 m, a geo- metric albedo range of 0.062-0.067, and a thermal inertia range of 350-1000 J m−2 s−0.5 K−1. The smallest thermal inertia values are connected to low roughness values (r.m.s.-slopes ≤ 0.3) and the largest thermal inertia values to very rough surface levels (r.m.s.-slopes ≥ 0.5). The calculations for the Michelle/Gemini North data put another constraint on the thermal inertia and re- duce the possible range to 350 - 800 J m−2 s−0.5 K−1. The derived radiometric albedo range of 0.062-0.067 is connected to the HV magnitude of 21.2 m, if we include the ±0.15 mag, then the pos- sible range is significantly bigger: from 0.055 to 0.075. 5. Conclusions Here is a short summary of our findings for the near-Earth aster- oid 2005 YU55: 1. Our thermal data can be explained via a spherical shape model without seeing significant offsets at specific rotational phases, showing that 2005 YU55 is almost spherical. Fig. 10. The size and albedo solutions for the full range of ther- mal inertias, the four different levels of roughness and for the most likely spin-axis solutions. 2. Our best spin-axis solution can be specified by (λecl, βecl) = (60◦ ± 30◦, -60◦ ± 15◦). However, the analysis of the ther- mal data alone would also allow for specific spin-axis orien- tations in the northern ecliptic hemisphere with a prograde rotation of the object. 3. The radiometric analysis of our thermal data which span a wide range of phase angles and wavelengths (best visible in the χ2-picture in Fig. 5) is compatible with changing spin- axis orientations, which might be an indication for a non- principal axis rotation of 2005 YU55. 4. 2005 YU55 has a possible effective diameter range of Dequ = 300 - 312 m (equivalent diameter of an equal volume sphere); this range was derived under the assumption that the spin-axis is indeed as specified above. 5. The analysis of all available data combined revealed a dis- crepancy with the radar-derived size. 6. The geometric visual albedo pV was radiometrically derived to be in the range 0.062 to 0.067 (HV = 21.2 mag) or 0.055 - 0.075 if we include the ±0.15 mag error in HV, in agreement with the C-type taxonomic classification. 7. 2005 YU55 has a thermal inertia in the range 350- 800 Jm−2s−0.5K−1, very similar to the value found for the rubble-pile asteroid (25143) Itokawa by Muller et al. (2005). We expect therefore that the surface of 2005 YU55 looks 11 Muller et al.: MIR Observations of (308635) 2005 YU55 Vodniza, A.Q. & M.R. Pereira, 2010, DPS meeting #42, #13.25, BAAS 42, 1057 Warner, B. D., Stephens, R. D., Brinsfield, J. W. et al. 2012, The Minor Planet Bulletin, Association of Lunar and Planetary Observers, Vol. 39, No. 2, 84- 85 Warner, B. D., Stephens, R. D., Brinsfield, J. W. et al. 2012, Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 2012, conference proceedings, LPI Contribution No. 1667, id. 6013 Yoshii, Y., Aoki, T., Doi, M. et al. 2010, Proc. SPIE 7733, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, 773308 also very similar and is composed of low conductivity fine regolith mixed with larger rocks and boulders which have much higher thermal inertias. 8. The observed thermal emission can be best reproduced when considering a low to intermediate roughness with an r.m.s.- slope of 0.1-0.3; the lower roughness (or smoother surface) is connected to the lower thermal inertias, while a higher roughness would require also the higher inertia values. Acknowledgements. We would like to thank the Herschel operations team which supported the planning and scheduling of our fixed-time observations. Without their dedication and enthusiasm these measurements would not have been pos- sible. The Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica. SH is supported by the Space Plasma Laboratory, ISAS/JAXA. AP is supported by the Hungarian grant LP2012-31/2012. References Asano, K., Miyata, T., Sako, S. et al., 2012, Proc. of SPIE, 8446, 115 Bodewits, D., Campana, S., Kennea, J. et al. 2011, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 2937, 1 (2011) Busch, M. W., Benner, L. A. M., Brozovic, M. et al. 2012, Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 2012, conference proceedings, LPI Contribution No. 1667, id. 6179 Cohen, M., Walker, R. G., Carter, B. et al., 1999, AJ, 117, 1864 Delbo, M., dell'Oro, A., Harris, A. W. et al. 2007, Icarus 190, 236 Hicks, M., Lawrence, K., Benner, L. 2010, The Astronomer's Telegram, 2571 Hicks, M., Somers, J., Truong, T. & Teague, S. 2011, The Astronomer's Telegram, 3763 Horner, J., Muller, T. G., Lykawka, P. S. 2012, MNRAS 423, 2587-2596 Keihm, S., Tosi, F., Kamp, L. et al. 2012, Icarus 221, 395 Lagerros, J. S. V. 1996, A&A 310, 1011 Lagerros, J. S. V. 1997, A&A 325, 1226 Lagerros, J. S. V. 1998, A&A 332, 1123 Lim, T. L., Stansberry, J., Muller, T. G. et al. 2010, A&A 518, 148-152 Lim, L. F., Emery, J. P., Moskovitz, N. A., Granvik, M. 2012, 43rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, LPI Contribution No. 1659, id. 2202 Lim, L. F., Emery, J. P., Moskovitz, N. A., Granvik, M. 2012, Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 2012, conference proceedings, LPI Contribution No. 1667, id. 6295 Lim, L. F., Emery, J. P., Moskovitz, N. A., et al. 2012, DPS meeting #44, #305.01 Merline, W. J., Drummond J. D., Tamblyn, P. M. et al. 2011, IAU Circular 9242, http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/iauc/09200/09242.html Merline, W. J., Drummond J. D., Tamblyn, P. M. et al. 2012, Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 2012, conference proceedings, LPI Contribution No. 1667, id. 6372 Miyata, T., Sako, S., Nakamura, T. et al., 2008, Proc. SPIE 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, 701428 Muller, T. G. & Lagerros, J. S. V. 1998, A&A, 338, 340-352 Muller, T. G. 2002, M&PS, 37, 1919 Muller, T. G. & Blommaert, J. A. D. L. 2004, A&A, 418, 347-356 Muller, T. G., Sterzik, M. F., Schutz, O. et al. 2004, A&A, 424, 1075-1080 Muller, T. G., Sekiguchi, T., Kaasalainen, M. et al. 2005, A&A, 443, 347-355 Muller, T. G., Durech, J., Hasegawa, S. et al. 2011, A&A, 525, 145 Muller, T. G., Altieri, B. & Kidger, M. 2011, IAU Circular 9241, http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/iauc/09200/09241.html Muller, T. G., O'Rourke, L., Barucci, A. M. et al. 2012, A&A, 548, 36-45 Nakamura, T., Miyata, T., Sako, S. et al., 2010, Proc. SPIE 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, 773561 Nolan, M. C., Vervack, R. J., Howell, E. S. et al. 2010, American Astronomical Society, DPS meeting #42, #13.19, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 42, p. 1056 Ostro, S., Hudson, R. S., Benner, L. A. M. et al. 2002, in Asteroids III, W. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi and R. P. Binzel (eds), 151-168 Pravec, P., Harris, A. W., Scheirich, P. et al. 2005, Icarus 173, 108-131 Sako, S., Aoki, T., Doi, M. et al., 2008, Proc. SPIE 7012, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes II, 70122T Somers, J.M. Hicks, M., Lawrence, K. et al., 2010, DPS meeting #42, #13.16, BAAS 42, 1055 Sridharan, R., Girard, J. H. V., Lombardi, G., Ivanov, V. D., Dumas, C. 2012, Optical and Infrared Interferometry III. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 8445 Taylor, P. A., Nolan, M. C., Howell, E. S. et al. 2012, American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #219, #432.11 Taylor, P. A., Howell, E. S., Nolan, M. C. et al. 2012, Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 2012, conference proceedings, LPI Contribution No. 1667, id. 6340 12
1911.00278	3	1911	2019-11-11T08:36:22	Importance of Giant Impact Ejecta for Orbits of Planets Formed during the Giant Impact Era	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	Terrestrial planets are believed to be formed via giant impacts of Mars-sized protoplanets. Planets formed via giant impacts have highly eccentric orbits. A swarm of planetesimals around the planets may lead to eccentricity damping for the planets via the equipartition of random energies (dynamical friction). However, dynamical friction increases eccentricities of planetesimals, resulting in high velocity collisions between planetesimals. The collisional cascade grinds planetesimals to dust until dust grains are blown out due to radiation pressure. Therefore, the total mass of planetesimals decreases due to collisional fragmentation, which weakens dynamical friction. We investigate the orbital evolution of protoplanets in a planetesimal disk, taking into account collisional fragmentation of planetesimals. For 100 km-sized or smaller planetesimals, dynamical friction is insignificant for eccentricity damping of planets because of collisional fragmentation. On the other hand, giant impacts eject collisional fragments. Although the total mass of giant impact ejecta is 0.1-0.3 Earth masses, the largest impact ejecta are ~ 1,000 km in size. We also investigate the orbital evolution of single planets with initial eccentricities 0.1 in a swarm of such giant impact ejecta. Although the total mass of giant impact ejecta decreases by a factor of 3 in 30 Myrs, eccentricities of planets are damped down to the Earth level (~0.01) due to interaction with giant impact ejecta. Therefore, giant impact ejecta play an important role for determination of terrestrial planet orbits.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version June 15, 2021 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 01/23/15 9 1 0 2 v o N 1 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 3 v 8 7 2 0 0 . 1 1 9 1 : v i X r a IMPORTANCE OF GIANT IMPACT EJECTA FOR ORBITS OF PLANETS FORMED DURING THE GIANT IMPACT ERA Hiroshi Kobayashi, Kazuhide Isoya, and Yutaro Sato Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan Draft version June 15, 2021 ABSTRACT Terrestrial planets are believed to be formed via giant impacts of Mars-sized protoplanets. Planets formed via giant impacts have highly eccentric orbits. A swarm of planetesimals around the planets may lead to eccentricity damping for the planets via the equipartition of random energies (dynami- cal friction). However, dynamical friction increases eccentricities of planetesimals, resulting in high velocity collisions between planetesimals. The collisional cascade grinds planetesimals to dust un- til dust grains are blown out due to radiation pressure. Therefore, the total mass of planetesimals decreases due to collisional fragmentation, which weakens dynamical friction. We investigate the or- bital evolution of protoplanets in a planetesimal disk, taking into account collisional fragmentation of planetesimals. For 100 km-sized or smaller planetesimals, dynamical friction is insignificant for ec- centricity damping of planets because of collisional fragmentation. On the other hand, giant impacts eject collisional fragments. Although the total mass of giant impact ejecta is 0.1-0.3 Earth masses, the largest impact ejecta are ∼ 1, 000 km in size. We also investigate the orbital evolution of single planets with initial eccentricities 0.1 in a swarm of such giant impact ejecta. Although the total mass of giant impact ejecta decreases by a factor of 3 in 30 Myrs, eccentricities of planets are damped down to the Earth level (∼ 0.01) due to interaction with giant impact ejecta. Therefore, giant impact ejecta play an important role for determination of terrestrial planet orbits. Keywords: Planet formation (1241), Solar system formation (1530), Inner planets (797) 1. INTRODUCTION In the standard scenario for terrestrial planet forma- tion, Mars-sized protoplanets are formed prior to the gas depletion of the protoplanetary disk (in several Myrs) with large orbital separations ∼ 10 mutual Hill radii (e.g., Kobayashi & Dauphas 2013). The gas depletion triggers the long term orbital instability of protoplan- ets and the collisions between protoplanets induced by the orbital instability result in the formation of Earth or Venus sized planets, which is called the giant impact stage (Chambers, & Wetherill 1998; Iwasaki et al. 2001). Most of the masses of the terrestrial planets in the Solar System is in Earth and Venus, which have low ec- centricities of 0.017 and 0.007, respectively. The largest planets formed in orbital simulations for giant impact stages have much greater eccentricities and inclinations than those of Earth or Venus (Chambers 2001; Kokubo et al. 2006). Those eccentricities and inclinations are possi- ble to be damped via the equipartition of random ener- gies (dynamical friction) with surrounding planetesimals (O'Brien et al. 2006; Raymond et al. 2009; Morishima et al. 2010). However, the surface density of surrounding planetesimals decreases via the collisional cascade of the planetesimals (Kobayashi & Tanaka 2010), which reduces the efficiency of dynamical friction. Therefore, collisional fragmentation plays an important role in this issue. On the other hand, a series of giant impacts eject frag- ments with a total mass comparable to Earth, result- ing in the increase of infrared emission. Therefore, gi- ant impact ejecta explain infrared excesses caused by warm debris disks around 1AU (Genda et al. 2015), while cold debris disks beyond 10 AU may be related to col- [email protected] lisional fragmentation in planetesimal disks induced by planet formation (Kobayashi, & Lohne 2014). Such giant-impact-ejecta disks may affect the orbital evolu- tion of protoplanets. The evolution of total masses of gi- ant impact ejecta is controlled by the collisional cascade. Therefore, we need to consider the orbital evolution and the collisional cascade simultaneously. The orbital evolution of protoplanets in the giant im- pact stage is mainly treated by N -body simulation. How- ever, all fragments produced via collisional fragmenta- tion cannot be treated individually by N body simula- tion because of computational limitation. Therefore, one applies the super-particle approximation where a super particle represents a large number of planetesimals and fragments. This method is applied for planet formation (Levison et al. 2012; Morishima 2015; Walsh, & Levison 2019) and for debris disks (Kral et al. 2013; Nesvold et al. 2013). In this paper, we newly develop the N body code including the mass evolution of planetesimals via collisional cascade, which allows us to evaluate dynam- ical friction and collisional fragmentation in the giant impact stage. In §. 2, we explain the method to develop the code. In §. 3, we conduct test calculations for the collisional cascade and validate the method. In §. 4, we perform simulations for the orbital evolution of proto- planets in planetesimal or giant-impact-ejecta disks us- In §. 5, we discuss the ing the newly developed code. effect of remnant planetesimals and giant impact ejecta on the orbital evolution of protoplanets in the giant im- pact stage. We summarize our finding in §. 6. 2. METHOD In the giant impact stage, the orbital evolution and collisions of protoplanets occur. The gravitational inter- 2 action with a planetesimal disk is important for the final orbits of protoplanets. However, the disk mass of plan- etesimals decreases due to the collisional cascade starting from planetesimal fragmentation. Therefore, we need to treat the evolution of orbits and masses consistently. We apply the super-particle approximation for plan- etesimals and smaller bodies ejected by collisional frag- mentation; a super particle represents to planetesimals and collisional fragments. Meanwhile, we apply a sin- gle particle for a single protoplanet. We numerically integrate the equations of motion of particles via the fourth order Hermite scheme (Makino, & Aarseth 1992; Kokubo, & Makino 2004). The orbital integration al- lows us to accurately treat dynamical evolution and di- rect collisions between protoplanets and super particles1. However, the number of super particles that we apply is much smaller than that of planetesimals and fragments with which we are concerned so that statistical treat- ment is required for accurate calculation of interactions between super particles. Morishima (2015) developed a method for the collisions and dynamical interactions between super particles in N - body simulations We treat the collisions between super particles following Morishima (2015), while we ignore the dynamical interaction because the collisional timescale is much shorter than the dynamical interaction timescale for dynamically hot planetesimals. We consider the j-th super particle at the cylindrical coordinate (rj, θj, zj) originated at the host star with mass M∗. The surface density around the super particle, Σj, is determined by the total mass of super particles in the area with r = [rj − δrj : rj + δrj] and θ = [θj − δθj : θj + δθj]; mj + Nn,j(cid:88) k  , Σj = 1 4rjδrjδθj mk (1) where Nn,j is the number of super particles in the area and mk is the mass of the k-th super particle in the area. We choose δr and δθ according to the accuracy of mass evolution of planetesimals due to the collisional cascade, which we discuss in §3. The relative velocity, which characterises collisional fragmentation of planetesimals in super particles, is de- termined by the orbital elements of super particles in the area. We calculate the relative velocity vj between plan- etesimals in the j-th super particle with semimajor axis aj, eccentricity ej, inclination ij, the longitude of peri- center j, and the longitude of ascending node Ωj, given by where vK =(cid:112)GM∗/aj, G is the gravitational constant, e2 r,j + i2 vr,j = vK (cid:113) r,j, (2) and e2 r,j = 1 Nn,j [e2 j + e2 k − 2ejek cos(j − k)], (3) 1 The total ejecta mass caused by collisions between protoplan- ets and super particles is estimated to be much smaller than the disk mass and their collisional lifetimes are much shorter than that of the disk. Therefore, we ignore collisional ejecta caused by colli- sions between protoplanets and super particles. Nn,j(cid:88) k Nn,j(cid:88) k i2 r,j = 1 Nn,j [i2 j + i2 k − 2ijik cos(Ωj − Ωk)]. (4) The collisional cascade grinds planetesimals down to micron-sized grains, which are blown out due to the radiation pressure of the host star (e.g., Kobayashi et al. 2008, 2009; Krivov 2010). Collisional fragmenta- tion of planetesimals thus reduces the surface density of planetesimals due to the collisional cascade. We con- sider the quasi-steady-state collisional cascade, for which Kobayashi & Tanaka (2010) derived the reduction rate of the surface density of planetesimals, given by (cid:18) vr(mc)2 2QD(mc)∗ (cid:19)αc−1 f (αc), (5) dΣ dt = − (2 − αc)2 m1/3 c Σ2ΩK where mc is the mass of largest bodies in the collisional cascade, αc is the index of the mass distribution of bod- ies determined by the collisional cascade, f (αc) is the dimensionless value dependent on αc, and Q∗ D is the spe- cific impact energy needed for the ejection of the half mass of colliders. The mass of largest bodies mc does not change in the collisional cascade, which is valid until D ∝ mp, αc is given the bodies with mc exist. For v2 by (Kobayashi & Tanaka 2010) r /Q∗ αc = 11 + 3p 6 + 3p . (6) The mass distribution with the index αc is achieved in the timescale for the collisional cascade. An earlier mass distribution index may be different from αc in Eq. (6) . However, the mass loss due to the collisional cascade is negligible in such an early stage and the mass evolu- tion mainly occurs when the mass distribution given by Eq. (6) is achieved. Therefore, Eqs. (5) and (6) are valid to treat the surface density evolution accurately. According to Kobayashi & Tanaka (2010), f (αc) is given by f (αc) = 1.055ρ−2/3 − ln + (cid:20)(cid:18) (cid:19) 1 2 − b s1(αc) + s2(αc) + s3(αc) (cid:21) , (7) where ρ is the density of bodies, b is the power-law index of the mass distribution of fragments, is the constant determining the largest mass of fragments, and2 (cid:90) ∞ (cid:90) ∞ (cid:90) ∞ 0 0 s1(αc) = dφ s2(αc) =− φ1−αc 1 + φ , φ1−αc 1 + φ dφ φ−αc 1 + φ (8) (9) ln φ (1 + φ)2 , 0 dφ s3(αc) = ln(1 + φ). (10) The impact laboratory experiments shows b = 1.5 − 1.7 and ∼ 0.1 (e.g., Takagi et al. 1984; Nakamura, & Fu- jiwara 1991) so that the choice of b and insignificantly change the value of f (αc).3 Therefore, we set b = 3/5 2 We correct a typo in s3(αc) of Kobayashi & Tanaka (2010). 3 We here evaluate the dependence of f (αc) on b. We consider p = 0.453, and then αc = 1.68. The values of s1, s2, and s3 are calculated to be 3.7, 7.4, and 2.6, respectively. The function f (1.68) with = 0.2 is estimated to be 28.9 and 33.8 for b = 1.5 and 1.7, respectively. Importance of Giant Impact Ejecta 3 and = 0.2. If vr is fixed, the integration of Eq. (5) over time t gives Σ(0) , 1 + t/τ0 Σ(t) = where τ0 = −Σ(0)/ Σ(0). In the giant impact stage, Eq. (11) is not always valid because of the evolution of vr. Therefore, we use Eq. (11) only for the validation of our simulation in §3. (11) Based on Eq. (5), the mass-loss rate of the j-th super particle due to the collisional cascade is given by (cid:32) (cid:33)αc−1 1 mj dmj dt = − (2 − αc)2 m1/3 c,j ΣjΩK v2 r,j 2QD(mc,j)∗ f (αc), Figure 1. Relative errors of the surface density at t = 100 years with the setting of τ0 ≈ 0.6 years for δθ = π/8 (red circles) and π (blue squares), as a function of the number of super particles. The error bars indicate the standard errors obtained from 40 runs. (12) where mc,j is the mass of the largest bodies in the j-th super particle. We calculate the mass evolution of super particles via the integration of Eq. (12) using Eqs.(1) and (2). The masses of the largest bodies in super particles, mc, are set to (cid:38) 1016 g corresponding to (cid:38) 1 km in ra- dius. Therefore, Q∗ D of such a body is mainly determined by shuttering and gravitational reaccumulation (Benz & Asphaug 1999; Leinhardt, & Stewart 2012; Jutzi 2015; Genda et al. 2015, 2017; Suetsugu et al. 2018). There- fore, Q∗ D has a monotonous increasing function of mc, which is assumed to be (e.g., Benz & Asphaug 1999) (cid:18) mc (cid:19)p 1021 g Q∗ D = Q0 , (13) where Q0 and p are determined from numerical simula- tions. The collisional cascade is controlled not by indi- vidual collisions but by successive collisions. The value averaged over impact angles is applied for Q∗ D. Tak- ing into account self-gravity and a model of rock frac- tures, Benz & Asphaug (1999) obtained the averaged values for Q0 and p via the smoothed particle hydro- dynamics (SPH) simulation. Recently, the dependence of Q∗ D on the number of SPH particles is argued and the value of Q∗ D decreases 20% in the limit of high res- olution simulation (Genda et al. 2015). However, the friction of damaged rock, which was not considered in Benz & Asphaug (1999), increases Q∗ D (Jutzi 2015). The value of Q∗ D obtained in Benz & Asphaug (1999) is simi- lar to that given by the high-resolution simulations with the fraction (Suetsugu et al. 2018). Therefore, we set Q0 = 9.5 × 108 erg/g and p = 0.453 (Benz & Asphaug 1999). 3. VALIDATION FOR COLLISIONAL CASCADE We perform a simulation for collisional evolution of a planetesimal disk composed of 2,000 super particles with a = 0.975 -- 1.025 AU and mc = 1016 g. The radial distri- bution of super particles is put according to Σ(a) ∝ a−1 and e and i have the Rayleigh distributions with mode values e = 0.01(a/1 AU)1/2 and i = 0.005(a/1 AU)1/2. The collisional-cascade timescale in this setting is esti- mated to be τ0 ≈ 0.6 years. We evaluate the accuracy of the method from the comparison with the analytic solution in Eq. (11) at t = 100 years. The accuracy of the simulation depends on the number of particles in the neighbor area, Nn. We calculate the relative error of the surface density from comparison of the simulation with the analytical solution. Fig. 3 shows the dependence of relative errors on the number of su- per particles. The errors are roughly proportional to the number of super particles, which is proportional to Nn for fixed δθ. However, the errors are almost independent of δθ. Although Nn decreases with decreasing δθ, the number of particles having the experience in a neighbor area is almost same in the time much longer than orbital periods if the number of super particles and δr are fixed. The timescale of the collisional cascade is mainly much longer than orbital periods. Therefore, the accuracy bet- ter than 10% is obtained if the number of particles in the annulus with width δr is (cid:38) 10. 4. ORBITAL EVOLUTION OF PROTOPLANETS IN A SWARM OF FRAGMENTING PLANETESIMALS We carry out simulations for the orbital evolution of 3 protoplanets with an Earth mass M⊕ in a planetesi- mal disk with 30M⊕ composed of 3,000 super particles around the central star with solar mass M(cid:12). The semi- major axis of the intermediate protoplanet is initially set at 1 AU, the orbital separation of protoplanets is 10 mu- tual Hill radii, and their eccentricities and inclinations are 0.03 and 0.015, respectively. The radial distribution of super particles is initially put according to Σ(a) ∝ a−1 and their e and i have the Rayleigh distributions with mode values e = 0.03 and i = 0.015, respectively. The in- termediate radius and width of the planetesimal disk are 1 AU and 30 mutual Hill radii, respectively. For the treat- ment of collisional fragmentation, we put δr = 0.01 AU and δθ = π/8. The collisional cascade is characterized by planetesi- mal mass mc. We set mc = 1016 g (≈ 1 km in radius) for collisional fragmentation, while we have an additional D = ∞ simulation without collisional fragmentation (Q∗ or mc = ∞). Figure 4a,b shows the orbital distribution of protoplanets and super particles at t = 103 years with collisional fragmentation, while Figure 4c,d is that with- out fragmentation. Dynamical friction decreases e and i of protoplanets, while e and i of planetesimals increase. Increases in e and i of planetesimals activate their colli- sional cascade, which reduces the surface density of plan- etesimals. Collisional fragmentation weakens dynamical friction so that e and i of protoplanets with fragmenta- tion remain higher than those without fragmentation. Figures 4 -- 4 show the evolution of the root mean squares of eccentricities (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 and inclinations (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 10-310-210-1100101102103 Relative ErrorNumber4 Figure 2. Eccentricities (a,c) and inclinations in radian (b,d) of super particles (red dots) and protoplanets (blue fulled circles) with fragmentation (a,b) or without fragmentation (c,d). for planetesimals and protoplanets in the same initial set- ting of planetesimal disks and protoplanets as Figure 4. If we ignore collisional fragmentation, (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 of planetesimals become much larger than those of proto- planets (Figure 4). This is caused by dynamical friction. However, collisional fragmentation of planetesimals de- creases the surface density of planetesimals (Figures. 4 and 4), which suppresses the e and i reduction of proto- planets via dynamical friction. Collisional fragmentation is effective for small mc so that (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 of protoplanets insignificantly change. On the other hand, the e and i evolution for planetesimals are almost inde- pendent of fragmentation. This is because the viscous stirring of protoplanets controls e and i of planetesimals. If we consider two populations of bodies such as pro- toplanets with (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 , and mass mp,1 and plan- etesimals with (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 , and mass mp,2, the time differential of (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 for α = 1 or 2 (proto- planets or planetesimals) due to dynamical friction and viscous stirring is analytically given by (Ohtsuki et al. 2002) , (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 , (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 α α 2 2 1 1 (cid:88) (cid:34) (cid:34) d(cid:104)e2(cid:105)α dt d(cid:104)i2(cid:105)α dt = a2 = a2 + + h4 α,βmp,β Ns,β 0Ω mp,β(cid:104)e2(cid:105)β − mp,α(cid:104)e2(cid:105)α β=1,2 (mp,α + mp,β)2 (cid:88) (cid:104)e2(cid:105)α + (cid:104)e2(cid:105)β h4 α,βmβ Ns,β 0Ω mp,β(cid:104)i2(cid:105)β − mp,α(cid:104)i2(cid:105)α β=1,2 (mp,α + mp,β)2 (cid:104)i2(cid:105)α + (cid:104)i2(cid:105)β (cid:18) (cid:19)(cid:21) (cid:18) (cid:19)(cid:21) mp,βPVS mp,βQVS QDF , (15) PDF , (14) where a0 is the mean semimajor axis of bodies, Ns,β is the surface number density of bodies for β = 1 or 2, hα,β = [(mp,α + mp,β)/3M∗]1/3 is the reduced Hill radius of bodies with masses mp,α and mp,β, PVS, PDF, QVS, and QDF are the efficiencies for viscous stirring and dy- namical friction for (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1,2 and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1,2, respectively. The analytical formulae of PVS, PDF, QVS, and QDF are given as a function of (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1,2 and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1,2 in Ohtsuki et al. (2002). The e and i variation rates due to dynamical friction are given by the second terms on the right hand sides of Eqs. (14) and (15), respectively. Protoplanets are much more massive than planetesimals (mp,1 (cid:29) mp,2). For mp,1(cid:104)e2(cid:105)1 (cid:29) mp,2(cid:104)e2(cid:105)2 and mp,1(cid:104)i2(cid:105)1 (cid:29) mp,2(cid:104)i2(cid:105)2, the dynamical-friction damping rates for protoplanets is approximated to be (cid:18) mp,1 (cid:19)1/3 3M∗ , d(cid:104)e2(cid:105)1 dt 1 PDF ∼ 1 QDF d(cid:104)i2(cid:105)1 dt ∼ − a2 oΩΣ 6M∗ (16) where Σ is the surface density of planetesimals and we assume (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1 ≈ (cid:104)e2(cid:105)2 and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1 ≈ (cid:104)e2(cid:105)2. The damping rates are mainly determined by Σ but are almost inde- pendent of the choice of planetesimal masses, mp,2. This means the super-particle approximation is valid. How- ever, dynamical friction leads to the equipartition of the random energies such as mp,1(cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 and mp,1(cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 . The values for the equiparti- tion depend on the choice of mp,2. Therefore, we need to care the choice of super-particle masses if we are in- terested in the equipartition. 1 ∼ mp,2(cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 1 ∼ mp,2(cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 2 2 To compare the results of simulations with Eqs. (14) and (15), we set mp,2 to be super-particle mass mj and integrate Eqs. (14) and (15) over time (see Fig. 4). The analytic solution is consistent with the simula- tion. For t (cid:38) 100 years, dynamical friction is ineffec- tive because of the achievement of energy equipartition such as mp,1(cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 1 ∼ mp,2(cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 . The result depends on the super-particle mass as discussed above. However, collisional fragmen- tation mainly occur prior to the achievement of the equipartition (see Figs. 4 and 4). 1 ∼ mp,2(cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 and mp,1(cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 2 2 The mass of planetesimals mp,2 in Eqs. (14) and (15) is initially set to be super-particle masses mj, although mc in Eq. (5) is independently given. We then integrate Eqs. (5), (14), and (15) over time. The analytic solution is roughly in agreement with the results of simulations (see Figs. 4 and 4). In the simulations, each super parti- cle has an independent mass. Super particles in the inner disk effectively lose their masses via collisional fragmen- tation because of high collisional speeds, while super par- ticles tend to have large masses in the outer disk. On the other hand, the mass evolution of planetesimal disks is calculated with the averaged collisional speed in the an- alytical solution. Therefore, the analytic solution cannot perfectly reproduce the simulations. However, the ten- dency of orbital interaction and collisional fragmentation is understood from the analytical solution. It should be noted that the relative increases in proto- planet masses are smaller than 0.2 and 0.02 in the case without and with collisional fragmentation, respectively. Those are caused by collisions with planetesimals. We estimate the effect of collisional damping due to the col- lisional accretion according to the model by Kobayashi et al. (2016), resulting in the e damping of 0.006 and 0.0001 for protoplanets without and with collisional fragmenta- tion, respectively. The collisional damping insignificantly affects the orbital evolution of protoplanets. Therefore, the analytical solution without collisional damping is in good agreement with the results of simulations. The timescale of dynamical friction is estimated from and Eqs. (14) and (15). 2 (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 damping timescale due to dynamical friction has the relation as for mp,1 (cid:29) mp,2, the (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 1 (cid:29) mp,2(cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 2 (cid:29) (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 If mp,1(cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 1 1 00.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.80.911.11.2(b)InclinationSemimajor Axis [AU]0.80.911.11.2(d)Semimajor Axis [AU]00.020.040.060.080.10.120.14(a)Eccentricity(c)Importance of Giant Impact Ejecta Q0 9.5 × 108erg/g (cid:19)0.68 (18) 5 This estimate implies a planetesimal disk with Mdisk (cid:28) M⊕ leads to eccentricity damping for Earth-sized proto- planets in a long timescale (cid:29) 104yr via dynamical fric- tion. In addition, dynamical friction increases (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 of planetesimals. The increase in (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 2 makes τdf longer. On the other hand, the decreasing timescale for Mdisk is estimated from due to the collisional cascade, τcc, Eq. (5) to be (Kobayashi & Tanaka 2010) (cid:18) Mdisk (cid:19)0.79(cid:18) ∆a (cid:19)−1(cid:32)(cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 (cid:19)(cid:16) a0 (cid:33)−1.36(cid:18) (cid:17)4.18 2 0.1 M⊕ 1022 g 0.1a0 1 AU yr. τcc ≈ 4 × 103 (cid:18) mc × 1 2 during the (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 For 100 km-sized planetesimals (mc ≈ 1022 g) with (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 2 ∼ 0.1, τcc (cid:46) τdf . It should be noted that dynami- cal friction increases (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 damping, which shortens τcc and elongates τdf as discussed above. Therefore, even if τcc ∼ τdf initially, τcc eventually be- comes much shorter than τdf . Equations (17) and (18) show τdf /τcc is independent of Mdisk and ∆a but depends on (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 , and mc. For (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 2 = 0.03, PDF ≈ 60 so that τcc (cid:28) τdf for mc = 1016 g, while τdf ∼ τcc for mc ∼ 1019 g. Therefore, as shown in Figs. 4 and 4, e and i of proto- planets insignificantly decrease for mc = 1016 g because of τcc (cid:28) τdf , while those are moderately damped for τcc ∼ τdf with mc = 1019 g. Therefore, the condition with tcc (cid:29) τdf is required for the e damping of proto- planets. 1 = (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 , (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 1 2 Planets formed via giant impacts have high eccentric- ities and inclinations. For Earth-sized planets formed in the giant impact stages, the mean eccentricity is ∼ 0.1 (Chambers 2001; Kokubo et al. 2006), which is much larger than the current eccentricities of Earth and Venus. The depletion timescale of a planetesimal disk with mc (cid:46) 1021 g is shorter than the e damping timescale via dynamical friction (see Eqs. 17 and 18). Therefore, larger planetesimals are required for e damping of Earth- sized planets. We consider such large planetesimals are produced from a giant impact. The mass ratios of largest giant impact ejecta to parent protoplanets are ∼ 0.01 (Genda et al. 2015). Therefore, we consider mc ∼ 1026 g, resulting in τcc (cid:29) τdf . We perform the simulation for the orbital evolution of a high-eccentricity planet with mass M⊕ in a swarm of gi- ant impact ejecta. Giant impact ejecta initially have sim- ilar orbits to parent planets. However, and Ω are even- tually distributed uniformly due to perturbation from other planets. The timescale to achieve a uniform distri- bution for and Ω, which is roughly given by the preces- sion rates for and Ω obtained from the secular pertur- bation theory (Murray, & Dermott 1999), is estimated as ∼ 105 − 106 years for giant impact ejecta around 1AU perturbed by a Venus-like planet, which is much shorter than the timescale for dynamical friction caused by giant impact ejecta. Therefore, instead of ignoring perturba- tion from other planets, we uniformly set and Ω of giant impact ejecta from the beginning. We initially set a = 1 AU and e = 2i = 0.1 for the planet and a = 0.95 -- Figure 3. The root mean squares of eccentricities (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 (red) and inclinations (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 (blue) for planetesimals (open circles) and protoplanets (filled circles) without collisional fragmentation in the planetesimal disk same as Fig. 4. The error bars are given by the standard deviation of 13 runs. Analytic solutions (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 for planetesimals (dotted lines) and protoplanets (solid lines) is obtained from the time integration of Eqs. (14) and (15). Figure 4. Same as Fig. 4 but for the treatment of collisional fragmentation. We take into account collisional fragmentation for mc = 1 × 1016 g. The mean surface density of planetesimals, Σ, decreases due to collisional fragmentation. The ratio of Σ to initial surface density Σ0 obtained from the simulation (open circles) and the analytical solution (solid line) is shown in the bottle panel. Figure 5. Same as Fig. 4 but for mc = 1 × 1019 g. (Ohtsuki et al. 2002) (cid:18) Mdisk (cid:19)(cid:16) a0 (cid:19)−1(cid:32)(cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 (cid:17)3/2(cid:18) M∗ 2 0.1 M⊕ (cid:33)2(cid:18) PDF (cid:19)1/2 17 (cid:19)−1 10rH 1 AU M(cid:12) yr, (17) τdf ≈ 1 × 104 (cid:18) ∆a × where Mdisk is the total mass of a planetesimal disk, ∆a is the width of the disk, and rH = (mp,1/3M∗)1/3a0 is the Hill radius for protoplanets. Note that PDF is estimated to be ∼ 10 for mp,1 ∼ M⊕ and (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 2 ∼ 0.1. 1 ≈ (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 0.0030.010.030.10.11101001000< e 2 >1/2, < i 2 >1/2Time [year]0.0030.010.030.1< e 2 >1/2, < i 2 >1/210-410-310-210-11000.11101001000Σ / Σ0 Time [year]0.0030.010.030.1< e 2 >1/2, < i 2 >1/210-410-310-210-11000.11101001000Σ / Σ0 Time [year]6 1.05 AU and (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 = 2(cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 = 0.1 for a giant-impact- ejecta disk composed of 120 super particles with total mass 0.2M⊕ and mc = 1026 g (Fig. 4). The evolutions of (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 for giant impact ejecta and the planet differs from those predicted by the analytical solutions given by the time integration of Eqs. (5), (14), and (15). Once (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 and/or (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 are much larger than 0.1, their orbits are controlled by the higher order terms for (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2, which are ignored in Eqs.(14) and (15). The higher order terms make dynamical friction less effective. Therefore, the variations of (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 for the planet and planetesimals are less than those expected by the analytic solution. However, e of the planet becomes comparable to or larger than the an- alytic estimate until 10 Myrs and decreases much greater than the analytic estimate in several 10 Myrs. This is caused by the orbital energy damping for the planet rather than its angular momentum variation. If the angular momentum is fixed, the energy damping given by −∆a/a results in ∆e = (1 − e2)∆a/2ae, where ∆e and ∆a are the changes in e and a, respectively. There- fore, even a small energy damping of ∆a/a ≈ −0.02 leads to ∆e ≈ −0.1 for the planet. Giant impact ejecta are scattered by the planet and tend to stay in the outer disk so that the planet loses the orbital energy via the scatterings. This is clearly shown in the semimajor-axis evolution for the planet and giant impact ejecta (Fig. 4). The collisional damping between the planet and giant im- pact ejecta also reduces the orbital energy of the planet. The accretion mass of giant impact ejecta onto the planet is 0.086+0.004 −0.005M⊕ for t = 10 -- 30 Myrs, and 0.029+0.04−0.004M⊕ for t = 30 -- 100 Myrs. Al- though the e damping is significant after 30 Myrs, the collisional damping expected from the accretion mass is slight. Therefore, the energy loss for the planet due to the scattering of giant impact ejecta mainly decreases its eccentricity. −0.006M⊕ in 10Myrs, 0.029+0.011 The mass evolution of giant impact ejecta due to col- lisional fragmentation is less important than that esti- mated by Eq. (5). Increase in e of giant impact ejecta due to planetary perturbation makes the giant-impact- ejecta disk wider. This decreases the surface density of giant impact ejecta, which reduces the efficiency of col- lisional fragmentation. In addition, collisions between high-eccentricity giant impact ejecta are more frequent around the planetary orbit. Collisional fragmentation between giant impact ejecta with similar and Ω thus mainly occurs so that those relative velocities are com- paratively small (see Eqs. 3 and 4). The mass loss by col- lisional fragmentation is thus less effective due to the in- crease of ejecta eccentricity. Therefore, the giant-impact- ejecta disk is maintained in a long timescale (cid:38) 10 Myr, resulting in the significant eccentricity damping for the planet. 5. DISCUSSION In the giant impact stage, orbital instability of proto- planets occurs in a timescale longer than 10 Myrs (Cham- bers et al. 1996; Chambers, & Wetherill 1998; Iwasaki et al. 2001, 2002; Kominami, & Ida 2002; Kokubo et al. 2006). The protoplanets formed from the long-term evo- lution mainly have high eccentricities (∼ 0.1) (Chambers 2001; Kokubo et al. 2006), which are much larger than Figure 6. The orbital and mass evolution of a planet and a swarm of giant impact ejecta. Top panel shows (cid:104)e2(cid:105)1/2 (red) and (cid:104)i2(cid:105)1/2 (blue) for the protoplanet (filled circles) and giant impact ejecta (open circles). Middle panel also shows (cid:104)a(cid:105) (green). Bottom panel represents the total mass of giant impact ejecta. We carry out three runs with different initial positions. The error bars indicate the minimum and maximum values. The lines are the same as Fig. 4. the current eccentricities of Earth and Venus. A swarm of planetesimals may damp the eccentricities of proto- planets due to dynamical friction (O'Brien et al. 2006; Raymond et al. 2009; Morishima et al. 2010). Instead, dynamical friction increases eccentricities of planetesi- mals, which induces collisional fragmentation between planetesimals. The collisional cascade grinds planetes- imals until small fragments are brown out by radiation pressure, which results in the mass loss of the planetes- imal disk. Collisional fragmentation may thus suppress the eccentricity damping for protoplanets. Therefore, we have investigated the orbital interaction between proto- planets and planetesimals, taking into account collisional fragmentation. Eccentricities and inclinations of protoplanets are damped via dynamical friction if we ignore collisional fragmentation (see Fig. 4cd). However, collisional frag- mentation weakens dynamical friction (see Fig. 4ab). The mass loss due to collisional fragmentation depends on the typical planetesimal size of which planetesimals mainly determine the total mass of the planetesimal disk. Collisional depletion occurs in a short timescale for plan- etesimal disks with small typical planetesimal sizes. For 100km-sized or smaller planetesimals, the eccentricity damping is ineffective due to collisional fragmentation (Figs. 4 and 4). The primordial planetesimals may remain even in the giant impact stage. Although the typical size of primor- dial planetesimals is not unknown, the size may be on the order of 100 km, similar to that of Main-Belt asteroids (e.g., Kobayashi et al. 2016). Due to collisional frag- mentation, dynamical friction for eccentricity damping is ineffective in such a planetesimal disk. On the other hand, the increase in the eccentricities of protoplanets is required for the onset of the orbital instability of proto- planets for giant impacts (Iwasaki et al. 2001). Although 0.010.030.10.3< e 2 >1/2, < i 2 >1/211.11.21.31.41.51.6< a > 0.030.10.3105106107108Mass [M⊕] Time [year]Importance of Giant Impact Ejecta 7 primordial planetesimal disks may not explain the small eccentricities of Earth and Venus, such a disk does not inhibit the onset and maintain of giant impact stages (Walsh, & Levison 2019). In addition, the direct forma- tion of Earth and Venus via the accretion of planetesi- mals is insignificant due to the depletion of remnant plan- etesimal disks via collisional fragmentation (Kobayashi et al. 2010; Kobayashi & Dauphas 2013). Therefore, colli- sional fragmentation supports the giant impact scenario to form Venus and Earth. Giant impacts lead to the ejection of fragments as well as collisional growth of protoplanets. The collisional ejecta from single impacts have 0.1 -- 0.3M⊕, while the typical size of giant impact ejecta can be as large as 1,000 km (Genda et al. 2015). The simulation for the in- teraction between a protoplanet and giant impact ejecta shows significant eccentricity damping of the protoplanet in (cid:38) 30 Myr (see Fig. 4). The collisional fragmentation is less effective in an originally narrow planetesimal disk for high-eccentricity planetesimals, while the dynamical fric- tion is also less effective for high eccentricities and incli- nations of planetesimals. As a result, eccentricity damp- ing for planets occurs in a long timescale ∼ 100 Myr. Giant impact ejecta are produced even in the early giant impact stage (Genda et al. 2015). However, the orbital separations of protoplanets are so narrow that gi- ant impact ejecta are distributed widely due to interac- tions with other protoplanets. In addition, the eccentric- ity damping timescale due to dynamical friction is much longer than collisional timescale between protoplanets. Therefore, sequent giant impacts occurs due to insignif- icance of dynamical friction by giant impact ejecta. On the other hand, stable orbital configurations of proto- planets are achieved after tens of giant impacts. Such orbital separations are wide enough to keep the orbital concentration of giant impact ejecta around the orbits of single protoplanets. Therefore, dynamical friction by gi- ant impact fragments is effective in the late giant impact stage, which may form low-eccentricity planets. Finally we need to discuss the accuracy of the mass loss due to collisional fragmentation. As we discuss above, the collisional mass loss mainly occurs after the colli- sional cascade is achieved. In the collisional cascade, the mass loss is mainly determined by the total ejecta mass from single collisions, and is insensitive to the mass dis- tribution of ejecta (Kobayashi & Tanaka 2010). There- fore, the uncertainty of collisional fragmentation mainly comes from Q∗ D at the typical sizes of planetesimals (see Eq. 18). As discussed in the previous studies (Kobayashi et al. 2016; Kobayashi, & Tanaka 2018), Q∗ D of 10 km- sized or smaller primordial planetesimals may be much larger than Q∗ D we set in the simulations. However, tak- ing into account the enhancement of Q∗ D, 100 km-sized or smaller primordial planetesimals insignificantly work for the e damping of protoplanets. On the other hand, Q∗ D of 1000 km-sized bodies are mainly determined by the self-gravity of colliding bodies (Kobayashi et al. 2010, 2011; Genda et al. 2015, 2017; Suetsugu et al. 2018). The uncertainty is small for Q∗ D of largest ejecta of giant im- pacts. Therefore, the e damping of planets formed in the giant impact stage is likely to be caused by giant impact ejecta. 6. SUMMARY Terrestrial planets are formed via giant impacts be- tween Mars-sized protoplanets. The resultant planets have larger eccentricities than the current values for Earth and Venus. Dynamical friction with a planetes- imal disk is expected to damp the eccentricities of pro- toplanets. On the other hand, the collisional cascade of planetesimals and blow-out of small collisional frag- ments by radiation pressure decrease the planetesimal- disk mass, which weakens dynamical friction with plan- etesimals. Therefore, we have investigated the orbital evolution of planets with collisional fragmentation. Our findings are as follows. 1. We have developed an N-body simulation code in- volving the mass loss due to the collisional cascade. We have calculated the mass evolution of a plan- etesimal disk composed of super particles using the code, which reproduces the analytical solution for the mass loss due to the collisional cascade with high accuracy. 2. We have investigated the evolution of orbits and masses of protoplanets and planetesimals via grav- itational interaction and collisional fragmentation using the N-body code. If collisional fragmentation is ignored, dynamical friction damps eccentricities and inclinations for protoplanets. However, colli- sional fragmentation suppresses dynamical friction. The timescale ratio of dynamical friction to colli- sional fragmentation depends on the typical plan- etesimal size but not on the disk mass. Even a mas- sive planetesimal disk composed of 100km-sized or smaller planetesimals cannot damp eccentricities of planets. Therefore, the disks composed of primor- dial planetesimals are ineffective for the eccentric- ity damping for planets. 3. Giant impacts eject collisional fragments. The to- tal masses of giant impact ejecta are several tenth of colliding planets. The typical size of the largest ejecta is ∼ 1000 km. We have carried out sim- ulations for a planet with an Earth mass in the disk with 0.2 Earth masses composed of giant im- pact ejecta with largest ejecta 1026 g. Collisional mass loss is insignificant for such a large typical size. Eccentricity of the planet is damped from 0.1 to ∼ 0.01 due to interactions with giant impact ejecta in (cid:38) 30 Myrs. Therefore, giant impact ejecta are possible to decrease the eccentricities of planets formed via giant impacts, comparable to those of Earth and Venus. We thank the reviewer for beneficial comments. The work is supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Re- search (17K05632, 17H01105, 17H01103, 18H05436, 18H05438) from MEXT of Japan and by JSPS Core-to- Core Program "International Network of Planetary Sci- ences". REFERENCES Benz, W., & Asphaug, E. 1999,Icarus, 142, 5 Chambers, J. E. 2001, Icarus, 152, 205 Chambers, J. E., & Wetherill, G. W. 1998, Icarus, 136, 304 Chambers, J. E., Wetherill, G. W., & Boss, A. P. 1996, Icarus, 119, 261 8 Genda, H., Kobayashi, H., & Kokubo, E. 2015, ApJ, 810, 136 Genda, H., Fujita, T., Kobayashi, H., et al. 2015, Icarus, 262, 58 Genda, H., Fujita, T., Kobayashi, H., et al. 2017, Icarus, 294, 234 Iwasaki, K., Emori, H., Nakazawa, K., et al. 2002, PASJ, 54, 471 Iwasaki, K., Tanaka, H., Nakazawa, K., et al. 2001, PASJ, 53, 321 Jutzi, M. 2015, Planet. Space Sci., 107, 3 Kobayashi, H., & Dauphas, N. 2013, Icarus, 225, 122 Kobayashi, H., & Lohne, T. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 3266 Kobayashi, H., & Tanaka, H. 2010, Icarus, 206, 735 Kobayashi, H., Tanaka, H., Krivov, A. V., & Inaba, S. 2010, Icarus, 209, 836 Kobayashi, H., Tanaka, H., & Krivov, A. V. 2011, ApJ, 738, 35 Kobayashi, H., & Tanaka, H. 2018, ApJ, 862, 127 Kobayashi, H., Tanaka, H., & Okuzumi, S. 2016, ApJ, 817, 105 Kobayashi, H., Watanabe, S.-. ichiro ., Kimura, H., et al. 2008, Icarus, 195, 871 Levison, H. F., Duncan, M. J., & Thommes, E. 2012, AJ, 144, 119 Leinhardt, Z. M., & Stewart, S. T. 2012, ApJ, 745, 79 Makino, J., & Aarseth, S. J. 1992, PASJ, 44, 141 Morishima, R. 2015, Icarus, 260, 368 Morishima, R., Stadel, J., & Moore, B. 2010, Icarus, 207, 517 Morishima, R. 2017, Icarus, 281, 459 Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar system dynamics by C.D. Murray and S.F. McDermott. (Cambridge Nakamura, A., & Fujiwara, A. 1991, Icarus, 92, 132 Nesvold, E. R., Kuchner, M. J., Rein, H., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 144 O'Brien, D. P., Morbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. 2006, Icarus, 184, 39 Ohtsuki, K., Stewart, G. R., & Ida, S. 2002, Icarus, 155, 436 Raymond, S. N., O'Brien, D. P., Morbidelli, A., et al. 2009, Icarus, 203, 644 Kobayashi, H., Watanabe, S.-. ichiro ., Kimura, H., et al. 2009, Suetsugu, R., Tanaka, H., Kobayashi, H., et al. 2018, Icarus, 314, Icarus, 201, 395 Kokubo, E., & Makino, J. 2004, PASJ, 56, 861 Kokubo, E., Kominami, J., & Ida, S. 2006, ApJ, 642, 1131 Kominami, J., & Ida, S. 2002, Icarus, 157, 43 Kral, Q., Th´ebault, P., & Charnoz, S. 2013, A&A, 558, A121 Krivov, A. V. 2010, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10, 383 121 Takagi, Y., Mizutani, H., & Kawakami, S.-I. 1984, Icarus, 59, 462 Walsh, K. J., & Levison, H. F. 2019, Icarus, 329, 88
1705.06090	1	1705	2017-05-17T11:08:08	Observational evidence for two distinct giant planet populations	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Analysis of the statistical properties of exoplanets, together with those of their host stars, are providing a unique view into the process of planet formation and evolution. In this paper we explore the properties of the mass distribution of giant planet companions to solar-type stars, in a quest for clues about their formation process. With this goal in mind we studied, with the help of standard statistical tests, the mass distribution of giant planets using data from the exoplanet.eu catalog and the SWEET-Cat database of stellar parameters for stars with planets. We show that the mass distribution of giant planet companions is likely to present more than one population with a change in regime around 4\,M$_{Jup}$. Above this value host stars tend to be more metal poor and more massive and have [Fe/H] distributions that are statistically similar to those observed in field stars of similar mass. On the other hand, stars that host planets below this limit show the well-known metallicity-giant planet frequency correlation. We discuss these results in light of various planet formation models and explore the implications they may have on our understanding of the formation of giant planets. In particular, we discuss the possibility that the existence of two separate populations of giant planets indicates that two different processes of formation are at play.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. santos May 18, 2017 c(cid:13)ESO 2017 Observational evidence for two distinct giant planet populations N. C. Santos1, 2, V. Adibekyan1, P. Figueira1, D. T. Andreasen1, 2, S. C. C. Barros1, E. Delgado-Mena1, O. Demangeon1, J. P. Faria1, 2, M. Oshagh3, S. G. Sousa1, P. T. P. Viana1, 2, and A.C.S. Ferreira1, 2 1 Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Universidade do Porto, CAUP, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal 2 Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal 3 Institut für Astrophysik, Georg-August-Universität, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany 7 1 0 2 y a M 7 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 0 9 0 6 0 . 5 0 7 1 : v i X r a Received date / Accepted date ABSTRACT Context. Analysis of the statistical properties of exoplanets, together with those of their host stars, are providing a unique view into the process of planet formation and evolution. Aims. In this paper we explore the properties of the mass distribution of giant planet companions to solar-type stars, in a quest for clues about their formation process. Methods. With this goal in mind we studied, with the help of standard statistical tests, the mass distribution of giant planets using data from the exoplanet.eu catalog and the SWEET-Cat database of stellar parameters for stars with planets. Results. We show that the mass distribution of giant planet companions is likely to present more than one population with a change in regime around 4 MJup. Above this value host stars tend to be more metal poor and more massive and have [Fe/H] distributions that are statistically similar to those observed in field stars of similar mass. On the other hand, stars that host planets below this limit show the well-known metallicity-giant planet frequency correlation. Conclusions. We discuss these results in light of various planet formation models and explore the implications they may have on our understanding of the formation of giant planets. In particular, we discuss the possibility that the existence of two separate populations of giant planets indicates that two different processes of formation are at play. Key words. Planetary systems; Techniques: spectroscopic; Stars: abundances; Methods: statistical; Planets and satellites: formation ----------------- 1. Introduction The detection of more than 3500 planets orbiting solar-type stars (e.g. exoplanet.eu – Schneider et al. 2011) makes the exoplanet domain prone to statistical studies. This opens the possibility to analyse the properties of newly found worlds and, in comparison with the model predictions, better understand the processes of planet formation and evolution (see e.g. Mayor et al. 2014). In this context, a significant amount of information was brought by the analysis of the star-planet connection. Initial findings have shown that the planet occurrence is closely linked to the metallicity of the host star (Gonzalez 1997; Santos et al. 2001, 2004; Ida & Lin 2004; Fischer & Valenti 2005; Mordasini et al. 2012a), even if this trend is a matter of debate for planets hosted by giant stars (Pasquini et al. 2007; Reffert et al. 2015). Stellar mass has also been suggested to influence severely the planet formation efficiency (Johnson et al. 2007; Lovis & Mayor 2007; Bonfils et al. 2013; Kennedy & Kenyon 2008; Reffert et al. 2015). Furthermore, several studies have shown that the archi- tecture of the planetary systems is closely connected to the prop- erties of the star. For example, it is now known that the orbital period and eccentricity of the planets may depend on the chem- ical content of the star (Dawson & Murray-Clay 2013; Beaugé & Nesvorný 2013; Adibekyan et al. 2013). In brief, the under- standing of planet formation and evolution processes is tightly connected to the understanding of the properties of their host stars. In this paper we explore the mass distribution of giant plan- ets orbiting solar-type stars in a search for clues about the for- mation of giant planets. In Sect. 2 we present evidence that this distribution likely presents more than one population, with two regimes separated in planet mass. In Sect. 3 we then explore the properties of the host stars of two planet regimes, to show that a significant difference exists concerning the stellar metallicity and stellar mass. In Sect. 4 the results are discussed in light of the different models of planet formation and evolution. 2. The mass distribution of giant planets In Fig. 1 we plot the mass distribution for all giant planets with masses between 1 and 20 MJup orbiting solar-type stars as listed in the exoplanet.eu database (Schneider et al. 2011)1. The lower limit was set because we only want to explore the giant planet domain. We only selected planets discovered through the transit and radial velocity (RV) methods2. In the upper panel of Fig. 1 we plot the mass distribution in log scale, while in the lower panel we present the same distri- bution in linear scale. The upper panel suggests that the mass distribution may have two different maxima, separated by a val- ley at around 4 MJup. These two regimes are also denoted in the linear scale plot: below ∼4 MJup the distribution has a clear 1 Data from the 16th of February 2017. 2 These constitute the vast majority of the known planets with a mass estimate. In the case of planets only detected with radial velocities, the masses represent minimum masses. Article number, page 1 of 6 stars using the following criteria. First, we selected only stars for which stellar temperatures, log g, metallicities, and masses are listed in SWEET-Cat and that have visual magnitudes lower than 13. This magnitude limit, though not very constraining, ensures that the planet masses can be derived with a reason- able confidence using radial velocities, and that the stellar pa- rameters, namely effective temperature and metallicity, could be derived with a high level of reliability based on high quality spectroscopic data. Then, we selected only stars with temper- atures below 6500 K and above 4000 K, thus excluding targets for which stellar atmospheric parameters could be less reliable. We also considered only planets with masses below 15 MJup, to try to avoid the inclusion of brown-dwarf companions. Finally, we decided to cut in orbital period to select only planets with periods longer than 10 days and shorter than 5 years. The first limit allows us to avoid hot Jupiters, whose formation and migra- tion processes are largely debated (e.g. Ngo et al. 2016; Nelson et al. 2017). The upper limit allows us to guarantee that the sam- ple is reasonably complete; giant planets in longer period orbits could have been missed in radial velocity surveys. However, we tested the results without including any constraints on the shorter period limit and adding a stronger constraint on the upper value (e.g. up to 2.5 years)4. The conclusions of the analysis presented below become even stronger when we include hot Jupiters or if we only select planets up to periods of just 2.5 years. A table with the selected sample is available in electronic form. 3.1. Planet mass, stellar mass, and stellar metallicity Using this selected sample, in Fig. 2 we compare the [Fe/H] dis- tribution of the stars with planet masses above and below 4 MJup. In the plots we use a "normalized number" to better compare the various populations (each with a different number of stars), meaning that the histograms are normalized such that the inte- gral over the [Fe/H] range is 1. The upper left panel presents this distribution for all the hosts, while the remaining panels present the distributions for stars within different mass intervals. Stellar masses were taken from SWEET-Cat, and were derived using the calibration in Torres et al. (2010)5. For each case, we applied a Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test to explore whether the two samples (more and less massive plan- ets) come from the same parent population6. The results of this analysis are presented in Table 1, and show that if we use all the stars or only the stars with mass above 1.5 M(cid:12) the low p-values strongly suggest the two samples are not part of the same popu- lation. On the other hand, as we go towards lower stellar mass regimes, the K-S p-values increase, i.e., there a higher evidence for one single population (see also Adibekyan et al. 2013). How- ever, in all stellar mass regimes the hosts of the more massive planets always have lower average metallicity values. Also, the spread of the metallicity distribution of the stars with the most massive planets, as measured via the standard deviation (STD), 4 A 2 MJup planet in a five-year period circular orbit around a solar- mass star induces a semi-amplitude signal with 11 m s−1, which is a value that is within the detection capabilities of present day instrumen- tation; this value, however, it is not straightforward to detect if the planet is orbiting noisier, giant stars. 5 The obtained results do not change if we use the masses listed in exoplanet.eu. 6 Using the python scipy.stats.ks_2samp library. ilar (scipy.mstats.ks_2samp) or (scipy.stats.anderson_ksamp). Sim- a one-sided K-S test test Anderson-Darling a results are obtained if we use Fig. 1. Mass distribution of giant planets around solar-type stars, in log (top panel) and linear (lower panel) scales. The green histograms include all planets in exoplanet.eu, and the blue histogram includes only planets following the criteria mentioned in Section. 3. peaked shape, while above this mass the distribution is suddenly mostly flat, with a slowly decreasing trend up to (tentatively) ∼15 MJup. The two dashed lines in the plot denote this change in slope, and are used here merely as visual guide. The existence of a transition at a similar mass value (∼5 MJup) has also been recently mentioned by Bashi et al. (2017) based on the analysis of planets with measured mass and radius, even if these authors concentrated their discussion exclusively on planets with masses lower than this limit. The possible existence of two mass regimes suggests that there may be two different populations of giant planets, with masses above and below ∼4 MJup. 3. Exploring the various mass regimes To explore this possibility, we compare the metallicity and mass distributions for the stars having planets in these two planet-mass regimes. For that purpose we started by compiling stellar pa- rameters for all the stars selected above from the SWEET-Cat database3 dabatase (Santos et al. 2013), which is a large cata- log of stellar parameters for stars with planets. We then selected 3 https://www.astro.up.pt/resources/sweet-cat Article number, page 2 of 6 N. C. Santos et al.: Observational evidence for two distinct giant planet populations is always larger than that found for the lower mass planet host stars. In other words, they span a larger metallicity range. We also ran a clustering analysis on the two-dimensional planet mass - stellar metallicity distribution using the planets se- lected following the criteria mentioned in the next section. The upper panel of Fig.3 shows a scatter plot of the above-mentioned variables. The plot shows a clustering for planet masses below ∼4 MJup and metallicities above ∼−0.3 dex. Planets with masses above that value are more scattered in both planet mass and stel- lar metallicity. In the lower panel we show the result of a cluster- ing analysis. A Gaussian mixture was considered7, in which the data set is modelled with a fixed number of (two-dimensional) Gaussian distributions. We assumed the presence of two clus- ters and iteratively optimized the parameters of the distributions using the expectation-maximization algorithm (Gupta & Chen 2011). In the lower panel of Fig.3 we show the underlying dis- tribution of our sample and the two clusters that result from this analysis. The clusters basically divide the data set into lower and higher mass planets and overlap near 4 MJup. Their centres show an offset in metallicity of 0.14 dex, where the average [Fe/H] is lower for the hosts of the more massive planets. It is worth noting that the higher mass stars in our sample are also, on average, more evolved. The evolved stars (defined here as those with log g<3.5) in our sample have mass values from ∼1 to 4.5 M(cid:12), while the dwarfs have maximum masses of about 1.5 M(cid:12) with most stars in the range between 0.7 and 1.3 M(cid:12). Also, above 3 M(cid:12) all eight stars with planets in the mass range above 4 MJup have metallicities below solar ([Fe/H] between - 0.13 and -0.74 dex), while the only star with a lower mass planet has super-solar metallicities (0.07 dex). 3.2. Comparing with the solar neighbourhood It is interesting to see that for the most massive stars and for those with mass below solar mass, the average metallicity of the mas- sive planet hosts is similar to the average metallicity of the so- lar neighbourhood for dwarfs (−0.11 dex, STD=0.24) and giants (−0.08 dex, STD=0.18) (Sousa et al. 2011; Alves et al. 2015). In other words, in these stellar mass regimes, the metallicity distri- bution of the stars with the most massive planets is very similar to that observed in solar neighbourhood stars. Stars in the inter- mediate mass range, on the other hand, present higher metallicity values, on average. This likely reflects the fact that most of these are dwarfs; as shown in Santos et al. (e.g. 2013), when a cut in colour is applied to a sample of dwarfs, more massive stars are on average more metal rich. To explore these points in more detail, we compare the metallicity distributions of the hosts of massive planets with those of field dwarfs and giants, dividing the stars in the three groups of stellar mass as listed in Table 1. The comparison of the [Fe/H] distribution of the stars with M(cid:63) ≤1.0 M(cid:12) shows that the two distributions have a K-S p-value of 0.04. Field dwarfs (from Sousa et al. 2011) have slightly lower average metallic- ity and standard deviation. Considering dwarfs with masses be- tween 1.0 and 1.5 M(cid:12), the two groups are most likely statistically similar (K-S p-value of 0.06), with the same average value (0.04 in both cases) but a lower dispersion for the field dwarfs. Fi- nally, comparing the hosts of massive planets with mass above 1.5 M(cid:12) with giant stars of similar mass from Alves et al. (2015), we also do not find strong hints to refute the hypothesis that the two groups may come from the same parent distribution (K-S 7 As implemented in the scikit-learn package (Pedregosa et al. 2011). p-value of 0.03). In this case, the average value of [Fe/H] distri- bution of the field stars has higher values than the one found for the host stars of the more massive planets. Again, the standard deviation has lower values. We did the same comparison for the hosts of the lower mass planets (Mpl<4 MJup). In that case, as expected, planet hosts are always strongly significantly more metal rich than field stars, in all stellar mass regimes compared. The K-S p-values are very low, ranging from 3 10−3 for the most massive stars, down to 10−7 and 10−8 for the other stellar mass regimes. The metal- licity distribution of the low-mass planet hosts thus follows the usual metallicity-giant planet frequency correlation (Santos et al. 2004; Fischer & Valenti 2005). 3.3. Other planet properties We further tested whether any other planet property was signif- icantly different between the two populations of planets (more and less massive than 4 MJup). For instance, the orbital periods of the higher mass planet population are indeed longer: 613 ver- sus 566 days if all stars are considered. These differences are, however, not statistically significant (K-S p-value of 0.33). It is worth mentioning, however, that as already pointed out (e.g. Adibekyan et al. 2013), lower metallicity stars host, on average, planets in longer orbital periods. As seen above, the lower-mass planet population also has higher metallicity, on average, a fact that could by itself explain this offset. Finally, we also tested if the eccentricity distributions of the two samples are different. The results show that no statistically significant differences exist (K-S p-value of 0.25), even if higher mass planets tend to have slightly higher average values for the orbital eccentricity when compared with the lower mass plan- ets in our selection: 0.29 (STD=0.22) and 0.25 (STD=0.14), re- spectively. This trend may actually be expected from theoretical models of planet-disk interaction (Bitsch et al. 2013), as already discussed in Adibekyan et al. (2013). 4. Discussion The results presented above suggest that giant planets with masses above and below ∼4 MJup may represent two different populations. The data we analyse shows that stars with planets more massive than 4 MJup orbit stars that are on average more metal-poor. This trend is statistically significant for the more massive stars (M > 1.5M(cid:12)), even it if is also observed in all the analysed stellar mass regimes. We also show that planets with Mpl>4 MJup orbit stars that span a wider metallicity range than stars with lower mass planets, and have [Fe/H] distributions more similar to the average field stars of similar mass. The fact that the metallicity distribution for the stars with the more massive planets is lower is intriguing. Metallicity is known to be intimately related to the frequency of giant planets, a result coming from both observations and theoretical models based on the core-accretion paradigm (e.g. Santos et al. 2004; Fischer & Valenti 2005; Mordasini et al. 2012a). More metal-rich stars may also be able to form higher mass planets, even if this trend is not necessarily strong (see Mordasini et al. 2012a, and their Figs. 4 and 5). The results presented here thus seem to contradict these expectations. In the context of the core-accretion paradigm, Kennedy & Kenyon (2008) suggested that the frequency of planets is an in- creasing function of stellar mass, at least up to ∼3 M(cid:12). This result is supported by observational evidence (e.g. Reffert et al. Article number, page 3 of 6 Fig. 2. Metallicity distribution for stars with giant planets in different mass regimes. Upper left: The metallicity distribution is shown for all stars. Remaining three panels: The metallicity distribution is shown for three different stellar mass regimes. Table 1. Comparison of the metallicity distributions of the stars with planets in the two mass regimes and values for the solar neighbourhood populations (for dwarfs/giants). Sample All stars M(cid:63) ≥1.5 M(cid:12) M(cid:63) ≤1.0 M(cid:12) 1.0 M(cid:12)<M(cid:63)<1.5 M(cid:12) Mpl > 4 MJup N <[Fe/H]> STD 0.28 96 0.22 30 48 0.26 0.34 18 −0.04 −0.14 0.04 −0.10 Mpl < 4 MJup <[Fe/H]> STD K-S p-value 0.07 −0.02 0.13 0.06 5 10−4 3 10−3 0.06 0.06 0.19 0.16 0.20 0.15 N 174 48 89 37 N 241 177 397 Solar neighbourhood <[Fe/H]> −0.11/−0.08 −0.08 0.04 −0.16 0.16 0.17 0.24 STD 0.24/0.18 2015, and references within). Higher mass stars are also known to have higher mass disks (Natta et al. 2000) that are likely ca- pable of forming higher mass giant planets. It could thus be that the tendency for the most massive stars in our sample to host more massive planets may be explained by the simple fact that their massive disks were able to form planets with higher masses, even if their metal content was lower. This could explain, in the context of the core-accretion paradigm, the existence of two pop- ulations of planets. If real, however, this model would have to explain the reason for the proposed change in regime around ∼4 MJup. Further- more, it would have to explain why in all stellar mass regimes studied, the metallicity distributions of the hosts of planets with mass > 4 MJup are always compatible with the field dwarf distri- bution (even if the [Fe/H] spread is always higher in the planet hosts), opposite to what is observed if we only consider hosts of the lower mass planets. For stars with mass below 1 M(cid:12), we find that planet hosts are more metal rich than field stars (even if the K-S p-value shows a value that is marginally significant). Article number, page 4 of 6 However, no difference, or even the inverse trend, is found when considering stars with mass above this limit. To further explore this, we compared the index M(cid:63) 10[Fe/H] of the stars with higher and lower mass planets. Assuming that the M(cid:63) is correlated with the mass of the disk, this index is ex- pected to measure the total amount of heavy material in a disk and thus be more directly related to the planet formation effi- ciency in the core-accretion scenario. Comparing the two indices for higher and lower mass planets and using all the stars in our sample we conclude that planets with mass above 4 MJup have systematically lower values. A K-S test provides a p-value of 0.08. This result suggests that the increase in stellar mass only partially compensates for the difference in metallicity. However, the exact relation between disk mass and stellar mass is not fully clear (e.g. Andrews et al. 2013), and may have an impact on these results. An alternative explanation for the observed populations calls for the disk instability process (e.g. Boss 1997). It has been shown that planets formed by disk instability should in principle have higher masses and be easier to form around stars with more N. C. Santos et al.: Observational evidence for two distinct giant planet populations objects above and below the "brown-dwarf desert". This was proposed to reflect the existence of two different populations that were likely formed by different processes: disk instability for the lower mass brown dwarfs and cloud fragmentation (as "normal" stars) for the higher mass brown dwarfs (see Ma & Ge 2014). Although the metallicity-giant planet frequency correlation is a well-established fact when dealing with dwarf stars, the ex- istence of such a correlation is still a matter of debate for giant stars. Indeed, some results suggest that this correlation may even not be present or could be weaker than that found for the dwarfs (see discussions in Pasquini et al. 2007; Mortier et al. 2013; Mal- donado et al. 2013; Reffert et al. 2015). As we have also seen, the most massive stars in our sample (>1.5 M(cid:12)) are also evolved. In the scenario mentioned above, the existence of two populations of giant planets that is observed for the higher mass stars may be deeply related to the possibility that evolved stars (more mas- sive on average) also do not show a very clear metallicity-giant planet correlation. A word of caution to say that this result is based on the as- sumption that all planets in the sample are bona fide. This may not be always the case, especially for planets orbiting giant stars (see discussion in Reffert et al. 2015). If these results are confirmed as new planets are detected, the discussion presented here may give a new important insight into the giant planet formation process. They also show that the study of giant planets is still of great importance, even if the focus of exoplanet research is moving towards the study of their low-mass counterparts. Giant planets discovered with the GAIA mission, whose sensitivity will allow the detection of thousands of giant planets in long period orbits around stars of different mass(Sozzetti et al. 2001) may shed significant light into this case. The study of the mass-radius relation of giant planets as carried out with missions like CHEOPS (Fortier et al. 2014), TESS (Ricker et al. 2010), or PLATO (Rauer et al. 2014), as well as of their atmospheric composition using new ground- and space-based instruments such as JWST and HIRES@E-ELT (e.g. Greene et al. 2016; Marconi et al. 2016), may also bring new constraints on the processes of planet formation (Fortney et al. 2008; Mordasini et al. 2012b, 2016). Acknowledgements. This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) through the research grant through national funds and by FEDER through COMPETE2020 by grants UID/FIS/04434/2013 & POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007672, PTDC/FIS-AST/1526/2014 & POCI-01- 0145-FEDER-016886 and PTDC/FIS-AST/7073/2014 & POCI-01-0145- FEDER-016880. P.F., S.B., N.C.S. e S.G.S. acknowledge support from FCT IF/01037/2013CP1191/CT0001, through Investigador FCT contracts nr. IF/01312/2014/CP1215/CT0004, and IF/00028/2014/CP1215/CT0002. V.A. and E.D.M. acknowledge support from FCT through Investigador FCT contracts nr. IF/00650/2015/CP1273/CT0001, IF/00849/2015/CP1273/CT0003;and by the fellowship SFRH/BPD/70574/2010, SFRH/BPD/76606/2011 funded by FCT and POPH/FSE (EC). PF further ac- knowledges support from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) in the form of an exploratory project of reference IF/01037/2013CP1191/CT0001. ACSF is supported by grant 234989/2014-9 from CNPq (Brazil). J.P.F. acknowl- edges support from FCT through the grant reference SFRH/BD/93848/2013. IF/00169/2012/CP0150/CT0002, References Adibekyan, V. Z., Figueira, P., Santos, N. C., et al. 2013, A&A, 560, A51 Alves, S., Benamati, L., Santos, N. C., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 2749 Andrews, S. M., Rosenfeld, K. A., Kraus, A. L., & Wilner, D. J. 2013, ApJ, 771, 129 Bashi, D., Helled, R., Zucker, S., & Mordasini, C. 2017, ArXiv e-prints Beaugé, C. & Nesvorný, D. 2013, ApJ, 763, 12 Bitsch, B., Crida, A., Libert, A.-S., & Lega, E. 2013, A&A, 555, A124 Bonfils, X., Delfosse, X., Udry, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 549, A109 Boss, A. P. 1997, Science, 276, 1836 Article number, page 5 of 6 Fig. 3. Planet mass vs. stellar metallicity plot for our sample stars. In the bottom panel we show the position of the two populations that result from our Gaussian mixture analysis (see text for more details). massive disks (e.g. Rafikov 2005; Nayakshin 2017). Further- more, it has been suggested that gravitational instability may be more efficient in more metal-poor disks (or at least not so metal- licity dependent as the core-accretion process), forming planets in longer period orbits, and potentially acting as an accelerator of the core formation (Boss 2002; Cai et al. 2006). In this scenario, the observational result presented above could be interpreted as showing the existence of two separate populations of giant planets formed by different physical pro- cesses. On the one hand, the lower mass planets (here defined with a tentative mass below 4 MJup) are formed by the core- accretion process and are more prevalent around more metal-rich stars. On the other hand, the more massive planets, whose for- mation process is mainly done through a gravitational instability process or a process where disk instability has played a role (Cai et al. 2006). This second population is less sensitive to the stellar metallicity. If confirmed, this scenario would imply that above ∼4 MJup the formation of giant planets is no longer dominated by the core-accretion process. An overlap of the two popula- tions likely exists, however. A deeper analysis with an increase in the number of planets in the samples is needed to confirm or refine this value. In this context it is relevant to add that studies of stars with brown-dwarf companions have shown that these have metallic- ity distributions that are very similar to the solar neighbour- hood stars (Mata Sánchez et al. 2014; Maldonado & Villaver 2017). The existence of a so-called "brown-dwarf desert", a pronounced scarcity of companions around Sun-like stars with mass around ∼30-50 M Jup (e.g. Sahlmann et al. 2011; Ma & Ge 2014), strongly suggests, however, that the higher mass planets are not likely to be the low-mass end of the "stellar" distribu- tion. Furthermore, recent results (Maldonado & Villaver 2017) also suggest that a different metallicity distribution may exist for -1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20.00.20.40.6[Fe/H]0246810121416Planetmass[Jupitermasses]-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20.00.20.40.6[Fe/H]0246810121416Planetmass[Jupitermasses]223 Boss, A. P. 2002, ApJ, 567, L149 Cai, K., Durisen, R. H., Michael, S., et al. 2006, ApJ, 636, L149 Dawson, R. I. & Murray-Clay, R. A. 2013, ApJ, 767, L24 Fischer, D. A. & Valenti, J. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102 Fortier, A., Beck, T., Benz, W., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instru- mentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9143, Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 2 Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., & Lodders, K. 2008, ApJ, 683, 1104 Gonzalez, G. 1997, MNRAS, 285, 403 Greene, T. P., Line, M. R., Montero, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 17 Gupta, M. R. & Chen, Y. 2011, Foundations and Trends in Signal Processing, 4, Ida, S. & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ, 616, 567 Johnson, J. A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 833 Kennedy, G. M. & Kenyon, S. J. 2008, ApJ, 673, 502 Lovis, C. & Mayor, M. 2007, A&A, 472, 657 Ma, B. & Ge, J. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2781 Maldonado, J. & Villaver, E. 2017, ArXiv e-prints Maldonado, J., Villaver, E., & Eiroa, C. 2013, A&A, 554, A84 Marconi, A., Di Marcantonio, P., D'Odorico, V., et al. 2016, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 9908, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 990823 Mata Sánchez, D., González Hernández, J. I., Israelian, G., et al. 2014, A&A, Mayor, M., Lovis, C., & Santos, N. C. 2014, Nature, 513, 328 Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Benz, W., Klahr, H., & Henning, T. 2012a, A&A, Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Georgy, C., et al. 2012b, A&A, 547, A112 Mordasini, C., van Boekel, R., Mollière, P., Henning, T., & Benneke, B. 2016, 566, A83 541, A97 ApJ, 832, 41 Mortier, A., Santos, N. C., Sousa, S. G., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, A70 Natta, A., Grinin, V., & Mannings, V. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 559 Nayakshin, S. 2017, PASA, 34, e002 Nelson, B. E., Ford, E. B., & Rasio, F. A. 2017, ArXiv e-prints Ngo, H., Knutson, H. A., Hinkley, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 827, 8 Pasquini, L., Döllinger, M. P., Weiss, A., et al. 2007, A&A, 473, 979 Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res., Rafikov, R. R. 2005, ApJ, 621, L69 Rauer, H., Catala, C., Aerts, C., et al. 2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249 Reffert, S., Bergmann, C., Quirrenbach, A., Trifonov, T., & Künstler, A. 2015, 12, 2825 A&A, 574, A116 Ricker, G. R., Latham, D. W., Vanderspek, R. K., et al. 2010, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 42, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #215, #450.06 Sahlmann, J., Ségransan, D., Queloz, D., et al. 2011, A&A, 525, A95 Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., & Mayor, M. 2001, A&A, 373, 1019 Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., & Mayor, M. 2004, A&A, 415, 1153 Santos, N. C., Sousa, S. G., Mortier, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A150 Schneider, J., Dedieu, C., Le Sidaner, P., Savalle, R., & Zolotukhin, I. 2011, A&A, 532, A79 533, A141+ Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., Mayor, M., & Udry, S. 2011, A&A, Sozzetti, A., Casertano, S., Lattanzi, M. G., & Spagna, A. 2001, A&A, 373, L21 Torres, G., Andersen, J., & Giménez, A. 2010, A&ARv, 18, 67 Article number, page 6 of 6
1512.03535	1	1512	2015-12-11T06:23:34	The Inner Debris Structure in the Fomalhaut Planetary System	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Fomalhaut plays an important role in the study of debris disks and small bodies in other planetary systems. The proximity and luminosity of the star make key features of its debris, like the water ice-line, accessible. Here we present ALMA cycle 1, 870 \mu m (345 GHz) observations targeted at the inner part of the Fomalhaut system with a synthesized beam of 0.45"x0.37" (~3 AU linear resolution at the distance of Fomalhaut) and a rms of 26 \mu Jy/beam. The high angular resolution and sensitivity of the ALMA data enable us to place strong constraints on the nature of the warm excess revealed by Spitzer and Herschel observations. We detect a point source at the star position with a total flux consistent with thermal emission from the stellar photosphere. No structures that are brighter than 3\sigma\ are detected in the central 15 AU x 15 AU region. Modeling the spectral energy distribution using parameters expected for a dust-producing planetesimal belt indicates a radial location in the range ~8-15 AU. This is consistent with the location where ice sublimates in Fomalhaut, i.e., an asteroid-belt analog. The 3\sigma\ upper limit for such a belt is <1.3 mJy at 870 \mu m. We also interpret the 2 and 8-13 \mu m interferometric measurements to reveal the structure in the inner 10 AU region as dust naturally connected to this proposed asteroid belt by Poynting-Robertson drag, dust sublimation, and magnetically trapped nano grains.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	accepted for publication in ApJ Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 THE INNER DEBRIS STRUCTURE IN THE FOMALHAUT∗ PLANETARY SYSTEM Kate Y. L. Su1,6, George H. Rieke1, Denis Defr`ere1, Kuo-Song Wang2, Shih-Ping Lai3,6, David J. Wilner4, Rik van Lieshout5, and Chin-Fei Lee2 1Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; [email protected] 2Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan 3Institute of Astronomy, National Tsing Hua University (NTHU), Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan 5 1 0 2 c e D 1 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 5 3 5 3 0 . 2 1 5 1 : v i X r a 5Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA and ABSTRACT Fomalhaut plays an important role in the study of debris disks and small bodies in other planetary systems. The proximity and luminosity of the star make key features of its debris, like the water ice-line, accessible. Here we present ALMA cycle 1, 870 µm (345 GHz) observations targeted at the inner part of the Fomalhaut system with a synthesized beam of 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)45×0.(cid:48)(cid:48)37 (∼3 AU linear resolution at the distance of Fomalhaut) and a rms of 26 µJy beam−1. The high angular resolution and sensitivity of the ALMA data enable us to place strong constraints on the nature of the warm excess revealed by Spitzer and Herschel observations. We detect a point source at the star position with a total flux consistent with thermal emission from the stellar photosphere. No structures that are brighter than 3σ are detected in the central 15 AU×15 AU region. Modeling the spectral energy distribution using parameters expected for a dust-producing planetesimal belt indicates a radial location in the range ∼8 -- 15 AU. This is consistent with the location where ice sublimates in Fomalhaut, i.e., an asteroid- belt analog. The 3σ upper limit for such a belt is <1.3 mJy at 870 µm. We also interpret the 2 and 8 -- 13 µm interferometric measurements to reveal the structure in the inner 10 AU region as dust naturally connected to this proposed asteroid belt by Poynting-Robertson drag, dust sublimation, and magnetically trapped nano grains. Subject headings: circumstellar matter -- radio: stars, planetary systems -- stars: individual (Fomal- haut) 1. INTRODUCTION The Fomalhaut debris disk has become the prototype for understanding the complexity of disk structures and their relationship to planetary systems. Due to its prox- imity (7.7 pc) and luminosity (17.4 L(cid:12)), many key fea- tures of its debris are easily accessible through optical, infrared and millimeter ground- and space-based facili- ties. The prominent planetesimal ring located at ∼140 AU, analogous to the Kuiper belt in our Solar System, is particularly well-studied (Holland et al. 1998; Kalas et al. 2005; Acke et al. 2012; Ricci et al. 2012). The sharp boundaries of this cold (∼50 K) ring suggest gravita- tional shaping by unseen planets (Quillen 2006; Chiang et al. 2009; Boley et al. 2012). Intense collisions among the planetesimals in this ring grind large (parent) bodies into fine dust, forming a disk halo composed of ∼µm size grains outside the cold ring (Acke et al. 2012; Kalas et al. 2013). The Fomalhaut disk has a warm (∼150 K), unresolved component near the star, first indicated by Spitzer 24 µm imaging (Stapelfeldt et al. 2004) and later confirmed by Herschel imaging (Acke et al. 2012). This warm excess has been suggested as an ice-line planetesi- mal belt, analogous to the asteroid belt in our Solar Sys- tem (Su et al. 2013). Furthermore, the Fomalhaut sys- tem is thought to have a very hot (∼1500 K) exozodiacal ∗ Fomalhaut is a triple system; here we refer the Fomalhaut planetary system as the one around the primary star Fomalhaut A. 6 Visiting Scholar, Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan dust population at ∼0.1 AU, revealed by ground-based interferometry at 2 µm (K-band) (Absil et al. 2009). In- terferometric data at ∼10 µm detect a hot component near ∼1 -- 2 AU (Mennesson et al. 2013; Lebreton et al. 2013). Therefore, the Fomalhaut system is the only sys- tem known to possess all five debris zones (very hot, hot, warm, cold, and halo dust) defined by Su & Rieke (2014). In addition to the debris system around Fomalhaut, a combination of imaging where the warm component can be spatially separated from the cold component and mid- infrared spectroscopy has revealed similar inner warm components in other nearby systems, for example, Eri: (Backman et al. 2009; Greaves et al. 2014), HR 8799: (Su et al. 2009; Matthews et al. 2014), Vega: (Su et al. 2013). ∼20% of unresolved debris disks show such warm compo- nents in their disk spectral energy distributions (SEDs) (Morales et al. 2011; Ballering et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2014; Kennedy & Wyatt 2014). Leftover parent bodies near the star generally have higher collisional velocities, i.e., shorter dynamical time scales, compared to those of more distant ones, as suggested in the fading of the warm components after a few hundred Myr (e.g., G´asp´ar et al. 2013). These components may be analogous to our as- teroid belt but with far greater mass; however, compared to the cold Kuiper-belt analogs they are much harder to characterize in exoplanetary systems. Identification and characterization of such warm components require very accurate extrapolation of the stellar spectrum and pre- cise subtraction. Not surprisingly, although it can be considered the pro- totype, the nature of the Fomalhaut warm component is 2 Su et al. controversial. Acke et al. (2012) propose that it origi- nates from free-free emission of a postulated stellar wind that also creates the hot excess revealed in near-infrared interferometry. However, Su et al. (2013) draw from all the resolved images and the spectroscopy to argue that it is a planetesimal ring placed near the ice line and pre- sumably created by processes occurring in other debris systems as well. In that case the Fomalhaut debris disk resembles the debris structures in our Solar System -- a dense Kuiper belt whose inner edge is maintained by massive planets (Liou & Zook 1999) and a more ten- uous asteroid belt containing dust structure (zodiacal cloud) determined by both the giant and terrestrial plan- ets (Dermott et al. 1994). There is a tentative detection of an excess in the ALMA cycle 0 image of Fomalhaut (Boley et al. 2012), but less than the prediction by the free-free model, and the star was at the edge of the primary beam so the excess flux is subject to the large uncertainty of the primary beam correction. Here we present a high angular resolution and sensitivity ALMA cycle 1 image centered at the star position, and provide a strong constraint on the amount of excess emission in the inner part of the Fomalhaut system. Section 2 of this paper describes the details of the ALMA observation and data reduction. In Section 3, we discuss the 870 µm measurement near the star, evalu- ate the expected photospheric value of Fomalhaut at this wavelength, and rule out any compact free-free emission originated from the star as the possible source of excess emission detected by Spitzer and Herschel. In Section 4.1 we review the properties of the inner 20 AU region in Fomalhaut by assessing all available excess measure- ments and discussing their uncertainties. We conclude that a warm excess at the ice sublimation temperature (∼150 K, i.e., an asteroid-belt analog) is robustly de- tected, independent of the uncertainty of photospheric subtraction and the presence of a tentative, hot (∼500 K) excess. In Section 4.2, we present SED models for the ice-line asteroid belt around Fomalhaut and set con- straints on its total flux at 870 µm, and we also show that a 13-AU narrow belt might be detected at (cid:46)2σ lev- els in the cycle 1 ALMA data. In Section 4.3, we propose a new interpretation for the hot excess detected by the Keck Interferometric Nuller (KIN) via linking the pro- posed asteroid belt to the dust structure in the inner 10 AU region. Additional validation in terms of the derived dust mass and the sensitivity of the adapted grain param- eters to our model are discussed in Section 5, followed by our conclusions in Section 6. 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION Fomalhaut was observed with the ALMA 12-m array in Cycle 1 (program 2012.1.00238.S, PI: Lai) in five execu- tion blocks at band 7. Table 1 summarizes the detailed information for each execution including the bandpass, amplitude, phase calibrators, and the estimated precip- itable water vapour (PWV). The data taken on the sec- ond execution of 2014 May 21 did not pass the quality as- surance procedure, thus are not included in the imaging and analysis study. A total on-source time of 172 minutes was achieved. The phase center is located at the star po- sition (RA=22:57:39.409, Dec=−29:37:22.423) corrected for proper motion at the epoch of the observation. Four 2-GHz wide spectral windows centered at 337.987 GHz, 339.924 GHz, 350.002 GHz and 352.002 GHz were used to measure the continuum emission with dual linear po- larizations from the target source. The primary beam size (the half-power width of the Gaussian beam) is 18(cid:48)(cid:48) at 345 GHz. The overall uv-coverage ranges from 23.0 kλ to 737.7 kλ. Thus, our data are not sensitive to smooth emission structures larger than ∼9(cid:48)(cid:48). The width of the outer belt is estimated to be ∼13 -- 19 AU (Boley et al. 2012), which is mostly resolved out by our high resolu- tion (∼3 AU in linear scale); therefore, our data only show a very faint trace of the outer belt along the minor- axis direction. The quasar J2258−279 was used as the amplitude calibrator in all execution blocks. The flux uncertainty is estimated to be 10%. All the data reduction and imaging processes were car- ried out with CASA 4.2.1 (McMullin et al. 2007). The final continuum image was obtained by performing multi- frequency-synthesis (mfs) imaging. Clean boxes of the expected cold belt location (generated with reference to the HST image) and the central 5(cid:48)(cid:48) for the warm belt, were used in the image deconvolution process. A final image with effective bandwidth of 8 GHz centered at 345 GHz was generated. The synthesized beam is 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)45×0.(cid:48)(cid:48)37 with position angle (P.A.) of 82.3◦. The rms noise in the final mfs image is 26 µJy beam−1. 3. ALMA OBSERVATIONAL RESULTS 3.1. 870 µm Measurement Figure 1(a) shows the central 6(cid:48)(cid:48)×6(cid:48)(cid:48) region of the map. A bright source, detected at the star position after taking the star's proper motion into account, has a full-width- half-maximum (FWHM) of 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)46×0.(cid:48)(cid:48)38 at P.A. of 86.4◦, consistent with being the star (also see Sec 3.2). To un- cover any faint structure that might be present around the star, we fitted a single point source model to the data and subtracted it from the original data in the uv plane, then generated the residual map. We used uvmodelfit in CASA to determine the best-fit parameters for the point source: a total flux of 1.789±0.037 mJy. The quoted uncertainty is based on the fit, i.e., this number does not include other errors from flux calibration. The resid- ual map is shown Figure 1(b). No structures that are brighter than 3σ are detected in the 2(cid:48)(cid:48)×2(cid:48)(cid:48) (15 AU×15 AU) region around the star after subtracting the best-fit point source model. Assuming the inner belt has a sim- ilar orientation as the outer belt, one would expect the disk ansae to be along the P.A. of 156◦. There are two ∼2σ blobs along that angle: one is ∼0.(cid:48)(cid:48)4 (3 AU) north- west of the star, and the other is ∼1.(cid:48)(cid:48)8 (14 AU) south-east of the star. Based on our SED model (see Section 4.2), the likely location of the inner belt is at radii of ∼8 -- 15 AU, suggesting the south-east blob could be part of the inner belt. Assuming the inner belt is also inclined by 66◦ like the outer one, but centered at the star (no offset), the ellipse on Figure 1(b) marks the boundary of a puta- tive 13-AU inner belt. Interestingly, there are a few 1 -- 2σ blobs along the expected disk circumference, suggesting this 13-AU inner belt might be detected at 1-2σ levels (more discussion is given in Section 4.2). Although the 1-2σ positive blobs along the non-offset, expected 13-AU disk circumference are intriguing, we note that there are also many −2σ blobs in the data as well. In summary, 3 ALMA Cycle 1 Observations of Fomalhaut Table 1 EB code X4a7 X11ad X135f Xe46 X119f UT Date 2014 Apr 29 2014 May 21 2014 May 21 2014 May 26 2014 May 26 Passband J2258−2758 J2258−2758 J2258−2758 J2056−4714 J2258−2758 Calibrators Flux J2258−279 J2258−279 J2258−279 J2258−279 J2258−279 Phase J2250−2806 J2250−2806 J2250−2806 J2258−2758 J2250−2806 # of anntena PWV [mm] 35 32 32 25 25 1.43 1.10 1.24 0.67 0.72 we do not find any significant extended structure around the star, and the reality of the putative 13-AU belt needs future confirmation. 3.2. Expected Photosphere Brightness at 870 µm and A Constraint on the Unresolved Excess Su et al. (2013) evaluated all available optical to near- infrared photometry and determined the stellar photo- spheric output to be 2.96 Jy in the MIPS 24 µm band. A simple Rayleigh-Jeans extrapolation then yields an es- timate of 2.2 mJy at 870 µm, significantly brighter (by ∼23%) than the point source measured at the star posi- tion. The discrepancy likely comes from two sources: (1) the uncertainty of the ALMA absolute calibration, and (2) the uncertainty of Rayleigh-Jeans extrapolation. The accuracy in absolute calibration for ALMA Cycle 2 is set at 10% for Band 7 (J. Mangum, priv. communica- tion). To verify the calibration, we used the solar analog method (Johnson 1965; Rieke et al. 2008) by comparing measurements of α Cen A with those of the Sun. We did this in two parts. First, we verified α Cen A is a so- lar analog by comparing its colors with those of the Sun. Then, we computed the submillimeter flux of α Cen A us- ing the solar relation between measured 24 µm and sub- millimeter. We derived colors of V − Ks=1.531±0.023, V − [24]=1.584±0.027, and Ks − [24]=0.053±0.032 us- ing the available K-band measurement from Engels et al. (1981), V -band from Alekseeva et al. (1996), Mermilliod (1991) and Hipparcos, and 24 µm measurement of 30.84 Jy from Wiegert et al. (2014) after proper photometric system transformation and calibration to the zero points defined by Rieke et al. (2008). These colors are virtually identical to those of the Sun and establish α Cen A as a valid solar analog star for the purpose of calibration. We then used measurements of the solar brightness temperature to connect the mid-infrared measurements to the ALMA calibration at 870 µm. We adopt the brightness temperature at 24 µm to be 4625 K (Model M in Vernazza et al. 1976), and the brightness tempera- ture at 870 µm to be 5470 K (Loukitcheva & Nagnibeda 2000). Taking 30.84±0.76 Jy as the 24 µm flux of α Cen A (Wiegert et al. 2014), the scaling from the solar brightness temperatures suggests α Cen A has a flux den- sity of 28.9 mJy at 872 µm. The error associated with this number is not straightforward to determine, but can be estimated as the quadratically combined error of 7% (±300 K (6%) in the solar 870 µm brightness temper- ature, ∼2% in the solar 24 µm brightness temperature, and 2.5% of the α Cen A 24 µm measurement). The mea- surement of 26.1±0.2 mJy for α Cen A from Liseau et al. (2015) then suggests that the solar analog calibration is brighter than the ALMA measurement by 10.7±7%, which confirms the 10% ALMA calibration uncertainty estimate is plausible. If we adjust the measurement of Fomalhaut to this al- ternative calibration, we find a flux density of 1.98 mJy (instead of 1.789 mJy), still somewhat fainter (by ∼11%) than the Rayleigh-Jeans extrapolation from 24 µm. We conclude that radiative transfer effects may cause a drop in the brightness temperature of the star, similar to the behavior of the Sun, which has a brightness temperature ≥5800 K across the visible (Vernazza et al. 1976) but of only 5470 K at 870 µm. The result that Fomalhaut is slightly fainter than the Rayleigh-Jeans extrapolation value is robust, and this independent calibration of our measurement also rules out any compact free-free emis- sion originating from the star as the possible source of excess emission detected by Spitzer and Herschel. 4. ANALYSIS 4.1. Properties of Inner 20 AU Excess in Fomalhaut In this subsection, we review all the available measure- ments that can be used to constrain the excess properties of the inner 20 AU region in Fomalhaut. These measure- ments can be categorized in two classes: (I) resolved mea- surements where emission from the cold belt is mostly excluded, and (II) unresolved measurements at the wave- lengths where the cold belt contributes much less emis- sion. In Category (I), the ground-based interferometric measurements suggest a K-band excess of 0.88%±0.12% (Absil et al. 2009, hereafter the VLTI measurement) and 8 -- 13 µm excess of 0.35%±0.10% (Mennesson et al. 2013, hereafter the KIN measurements) relative to the stel- lar photosphere. These interferometric observations can very effectively isolate the region that is very close to the star ((cid:46)2 AU in K-band and (cid:46)6 AU at 8 -- 13 µm) from the contribution of the stellar photosphere. In addition, the excess emission at 24 and 70 µm inferred from the resolved images of Fomalhaut by Spitzer and Herschel also belongs to the first category. Since the star and any unresolved excess are both contained within the instru- ment's point spread function (PSF), the excess estimate does depend on the expected photospheric values. In determining the unresolved excess, an accurate value for the photospheric flux is essential; it can be de- termined at ∼2% levels by fitting the stellar atmospheric models to the optical to near infrared photometry (Su et al. 2005; Engelbracht et al. 2007). At 24 µm, an ad- ditional unresolved source of 0.6±0.2 Jy was found in the early reduction of the MIPS data (Stapelfeldt et al. 2004). We reduced the original data with the final in- house reduction pipeline and calibration, and employed the PSF subtraction method. We find the unresolved 4 Su et al. Figure 1. (a) Cycle 1 ALMA map of the central 6(cid:48)(cid:48)×6(cid:48)(cid:48) region centered at the stellar position in the Fomalhaut system. The synthesized beam, shown as a white ellipse, has a FWHM of 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)45×0.(cid:48)(cid:48)37, ∼3 AU linear resolution at the distance of Fomalhaut (7.7 pc). Our cycle 1 observations reach a rms of 26 µJy beam−1. (b) Star-subtracted residual map. No structures that are brighter than 3σ are detected in the 2(cid:48)(cid:48)×2(cid:48)(cid:48) (15 AU×15 AU) central region. The expected disk circumference of a 13-AU narrow belt, which has the same inclination and position angles as the outer cold belt but centered at the star, is marked as the dashed ellipse. A few ∼2σ blobs are found along the ellipse. excess at 24 µm is 0.64±0.13 Jy, consistent with the old PSF fitting photometry (±1.5% level) by Marengo et al. (2009) for Fomalhaut and Sirius in the IRAC bands. The value (but with a smaller uncertainty). Acke et al. (2012) color difference between Fomalhaut and Sirius is 2.36 constrained the amount of the unresolved excess by fit- ting the resolved images with a SED model using complex mag at IRAC 1, 2, 3 bands, but 2.33 mag at IRAC band 4, suggesting a 3%±1.5% excess at IRAC 8 µm (a very dust grains (a mixture of compositions proposed by Min et al. (2011)), and derived a total of 0.17±0.02 Jy for the broad bandwidth of 36%). Since the IRAC measurement was derived by PSF fitting, the excess most likely origi- unresolved excess at 70 µm. Su et al. (2013) employed the PSF subtraction method, and derived a consistent nates from the region within 8 AU (in radius) (resolution of ∼2(cid:48)(cid:48) at IRAC 8 µm). number, 0.17 Jy with upper- and lower-bound fluxes of 0.58 Jy and 0.136 Jy for the unresolved excess. The reso- lution at both Spitzer 24 µm and Herschel 70 µm is very similar (∼6(cid:48)(cid:48)), which places the excess emission mostly from the region within ∼20 AU in projected stellocentric distance. In Category (II), the Spitzer IRS spectrum of the Fo- malhaut system presented in Su et al. (2013) provides good measurements in the 10 -- 30 µm region. The IRS spectrum was extracted and calibrated as a point source (resolution of ∼6(cid:48)(cid:48)). With a large slit size of 11.(cid:48)(cid:48)1 in the IRS long-high channel, the flux longward of ∼30 µm might be contaminated by the cold ring. Further- more, the IRS excess emission is subject to the uncer- tainty of photospheric subtraction. To account for this, the uncertainty for the IRS excess emission includes 2% of the photospheric emission (added quadratically) as shown in Figure 2. To illustrate the effect of photo- spheric subtraction, we also present excess spectra by ar- tificially scaling our best-determined photospheric model by ±2%. The resultant spectra (shown in Figure 2) have higher/lower flux in the 10 -- 15 µm region, but both are within the estimated uncertainty (gray area). We aug- ment the IRS excess determination with additional ac- curate1 broadband photometry. We adopt the accurate 1 To obtain infrared excesses at the ∼2% level, using a color One good way to characterize where the bulk of ex- cess emission comes from is to determine the dominant dust temperature in the excess spectrum. This domi- nant dust temperature simply means that the majority of the dust grains have a similar dust temperature, which is not subject to a specific grain model even though this temperature is usually derived by the blackbody formula. Fitting the IRS excess emission, the inner warm emission is best described by a blackbody emission of ∼170 K (see Figure 2); and the temperature remains the same for the excess spectrum that was over-subtracted by 2% more of the photosphere. If the photosphere level is lower by 2% compared to the nominal level (i.e., under-subtracted), the resultant IRS excess emission needs at least two tem- peratures to fit, 167 K and 497 K. Due to the uncer- tainty of the photospheric subtraction, we cannot rule out the presence of ∼500 K dust in the system, espe- cially, the two-temperature fit is a better fit to the IRAC 8 µm point. An alternative fit in this case is a single blackbody plus a weak (broad) silicate emission feature difference referenced to a clean, no infrared excess star (like Sir- ius) can avoid the uncertainty in photospheric subtraction as long as both the star of interest and the reference star (Sirius) have a similar spectral type and accurate photometry. Unfortunately, ALLWISE and AKARI IRC catalogs do not match the latter cri- terion sufficiently well. (a)(b)5 Figure 3. SED of the infrared excess for the inner 20 AU region around Fomalhaut with various models. The data points are the same as in Figure 2, except for the ALMA Band 7 upper limits. The measurement from the cycle 0 Band 7 (Boley et al. 2012) is shown as a filled square with a downward arrow, while the one from cycle 1 is shown as an orange downward arrow. The model from Lebreton et al. (2013) is shown as the thick dot-dash line composed of two belts (thin dotted-dash lines) at ∼0.1 and ∼2 AU. Our narrow ring (NR) models are aimed to fit the excess emission near the ice line (asteroid-belt analog) and are constrained by data points longward of 10 µm. dius) is ∼2.5 -- 5 µm around a 2.25 M(cid:12) star with a lumi- nosity of 17.4 L(cid:12). The maximum grain size is set at 1 mm since grains larger than this size contribute negligible emission in the infrared. We further assume the warm dust belt is confined in a narrow ring (NR) with a fixed width of 2 AU. The exact function of the density distribu- tion in the warm belt has little impact in the output SED for such a narrow ring; therefore, we adopt a Gaussian profile for the ring's density distribution. Because we lack good constraints on the Rayleigh-Jeans side of the excess emission, the SED models are not well constrained even with all the assumptions mentioned before. A small range of ∼8 -- 15 AU with various combinations of mini- mum grain size and size distribution slope can all provide satisfactory fits to the observed SED. We illustrate this degeneracy by presenting two narrow-ring models peaked at 9 and 13 AU shown in Figure 3, where both models have the same grain size distribution (5 µm to 1 mm silicate grains with a size slope of −3.65). Assuming the inner belt is inclined by 66◦ from face-on like the outer cold belt, a narrow ring of 9 (13) AU would cover ∼13 (17) beams in its circumference in our cycle 1 map. Given a rms of 26 µJy beam−1, the corresponding 3σ upper limit for the whole inner belt is 1 mJy and 1.3 mJy at 870 µm for such rings. Our narrow-ring SED models give a much fainter total flux (see Figure 3), con- sistent with no detection. As presented in Section 3.1, there are a few 1 -- 2σ blobs along the expected 13-AU-ring circumference. We simulate the 870 µm model image of the 13-AU narrow belt under the same observing depth and array configuration as the cycle 1 data. Figure 4(a) shows the synthesized image without including random thermal noise. We then added the random thermal noise by adjusting the PWV parameters in simobserve until the measured noise level reaches 26 µJy beam−1 as in our cycle 1 observation. We then applied the same procedure that generated Figure 1(b) to generate a star-subtracted residual map of the synthesized image shown in Figure 4(b) for comparison. Note that the noise in our simula- Figure 2. SED of the infrared excess for the inner 20 AU region around Fomalhaut. The thick green line is from the IRS spec- trum presented in Su et al. (2013) after the nominal photospheric subtraction. The gray area represents the uncertainty of the IRS excess, including 2% of the photospheric subtraction. The thin orange lines represent the excess IRS spectra if the photosphere is ±2% higher/lower than the nominal value. The filled squares represent the broadband excess emission estimated from the re- solved images, the open square is from the IRAC measurement (see text for details), and the 3σ upper limit at 160 µm is shown as a downward arrow. With the nominal and 2% higher photospheric subtraction, the IRS excess spectra (green and lower orange lines) are best described by a blackbody emission of ∼170 K for wave- If the photosphere is lower by 2%, lengths shorter than 30 µm. the resultant IRS excess spectrum is best described by a combina- tion of two blackbody temperatures at 167 K and 497 K (two gray dotted dash lines). (see discussion in Section 4.3.2 and Figure 6 for some ex- amples). Even with this tentative excess emission either at ∼500 K or a broad feature, the 10 -- 30 µm excess can only be fitted with a cooler component at 167 K, suggest- ing the robustness of the warm excess at the temperature of water ice sublimation (∼150 K), i.e., an asteroid-belt analog. 4.2. Parameters for the Asteroid Belt Model We use a simple optically thin SED model to esti- mate the physical location of the asteroid belt. Our SED model is based on the assumption that the warm (∼170 K) excess originates from a planetesimal belt lo- cated near the water ice line. Therefore, we only use data longward of ∼10 µm to constrain our fits and do not in- clude the possible hot ∼500 K component (see Section 4.3 for further discussion). In this scenario, dust de- bris is generated through collisions of large parent bod- ies and cascades down to fine grains (close to the ra- diation blowout size) with a typical power-law slope of −3.5∼−3.7 (Wyatt et al. 2011; G´asp´ar et al. 2012). The radiation blowout size2 depends on the stellar fundamen- tal parameters (mass and luminosity) and grain proper- ties (size and density). Using astronomical silicates (Laor & Draine 1993) with various densities ranging from 1.8 -- 3.3 g cm−3 to account for porosity, the blowout size (ra- 3QprL∗ 16πc GM∗aρg 2 The grain size can be parametrized by the β value defined as the ratio of the radiation force and the gravitational force on a particle, i.e., β = where Qpr is the radiation pres- sure efficiency averaged over the stellar spectrum, L∗ and M∗ are the stellar luminosity and mass, G is the gravitational con- stant, c is light speed, a is the grain radius, and ρg is the grain density. The blowout size (abl) is defined when β = 0.5, i.e., µm = 1.153 Qpr abl ρg g cm−3 L∗ L(cid:12) M(cid:12) M∗ 1 10100wavelength (µm)101102103flux density (mJy)One BB of 171 KTwo BBs of 167 K + 497 Kflux contaminatedfrom the cold ringIRS excess after nomial phot. subIRS excess with +/− 2% phot. unc.101001000wavelength (µm)10−1100101102103flux density (mJy)Lebreton+ 2013 modelflux contaminatedfrom the cold ring 9 AU NR model 13 AU NR model6 Su et al. Figure 4. (a) Synthesized image of our model for a 13-AU narrow belt at the same depth as the cycle 1 observation (details see Section 4.2) where the synthesized beam is shown as the white ellipse at the left-hand corner. No random thermal noise is included in this simulation. The contours mark the inner belt at the levels of 20 and 36 µJy beam−1. (b) Synthesized inner belt image with star subtraction. Random thermal noise is added to the simulated image (a) first, then the same procedure that produced the Figure 1(b) (a point source fitting and subtraction in the uv plane) was applied to generate this model residual image. The south-east disk ansa appears to be at ∼2σ levels based on this simulated model. tion is added randomly; therefore, it is not expected to coincide with the observation when compared to Figure 1b. Futhermore, we did not include any background con- fusion as estimated by Oteo et al. (2015) using ALMA calibration data, i.e., Figure 1b is expected to have some contribution of faint ((cid:38)3) background galaxies. Our sim- ulation suggests that the south-east disk ansa might be detected at ∼2σ levels. Nevertheless, a deeper map is needed to confirm this putative 13-AU belt. 4.3. Complexity of Inner Debris Distribution -- A New Interpretation of Interferometric Data 4.3.1. A New Model for the Inner 20 AU Excess in Fomalhaut Our proposed asteroid belt (a narrow belt near the wa- ter ice line, presented in Section 4.2) would not produce any detectable signal in the KIN measurements because the dust in this narrow belt is too cold (i.e., too faint) at 8 -- 13 µm, and it is located mostly outside the field of view of KIN. To reconcile with the KIN measurements, here we explore a different scenario including a P-R drag-in component from the asteroid belt and a hot (∼1500 K) ring produced by the magnetically trapped nano grains proposed by Rieke et al. (2015, accepted). To roughly estimate the feasibility of a P-R component from the proposed asteroid belt, we first compare the typical P-R timescale with the collisional one in our proposed ice- line belt3. The collisional time scale is ∼2×104 yr for a belt at 10 AU with an optical depth of 1×10−4 (see √ r3GM∗ 2τeff and 3 The collisional time scale is formulated as tcoll = the P-R time scale is as tPR = cr2 distance, τeff is the optical depth. 4GM∗β where r is the stellocentric below) around a 2.25 M(cid:12) star. This collisional timescale is slightly shorter than the P-R timescale, ∼3.6×104 yr for β =0.5 grains, suggesting some amount of material can drift inward under the influence of P-R drag, forming an interior extended disk. Additional material might be deposited in this region by disintegrating comets; hence the P-R drag component represents a rough lower limit but one that can be analyzed without introducing un- controlled free parameters. We construct individual SED models for each of the components according to its spatial constraint and ex- pected grain population in the drag-in disk. By adjusting the individual contribution of each component, we then simultaneously obtain good fits in the KIN measurements and the overall SED. The amount of material that can be brought inward from a dust-producing planetesimal belt due to P-R drag has been studied analytically (Wyatt 2005) and numer- ically (van Lieshout et al. 2014). Basically, it depends strongly on the amount of material (i.e., the collision rate) in the planetesimal belt. Assuming a single grain size in the belt and that the collisions are destructive, the effective optical depth (τeff (r), the vertical optical depth for a face-on disk) is parametrized as equations (4) and (5) in Wyatt (2005). To estimate τeff (r0) in Wyatt's formulae4, we use the observed fractional lu- minosity (fd) and the relationship, τeff (r0) = 2fdr0 ∆r , given by Kennedy & Piette (2015) (where r0 and ∆r 4 The analytical model by Wyatt (2005) has very simplified as- sumptions: grains with one single size and emitting like blackbod- ies. It is then not straight forward to use the optical depth from a SED model (a size distribution of grains with imperfect absorption coefficient) in these analytical formulae. (a)(b)are the belt's location and width.). The fd values are ∼1.2×10−5 in our SED models presented in Section 4.2; therefore, τeff (r0) is in the range of ∼1×10−4. For a planetesimal belt at ∼10 AU around a 2.25 M(cid:12) star with an initial optical depth of 1×10−4, the value of η0 (equation (5) in Wyatt 2005) is ∼2, and equation (4), τeff (r) = 1× 10−4[1 + 8(1−(cid:112)r/10AU ]−1, gives the max- imum amount of material that can spiral inward. van Lieshout et al. (2014) performed detailed numerical sim- ulations by including a size distribution of particles in a collision-dominated planetesimal belt, and found that the amount of the material due to P-R drag is roughly a factor of 7 lower than the simple analytical calculation. As suggested by Kennedy & Piette (2015), one can sim- ply scale the η0 value by a multiplicative factor k where k = 1/7 to match the numerical result from van Lieshout et al. (2014). In addition, van Lieshout et al. (2014) also found that the size slope in the drag-in component is ex- pected to be steep with a wavy distribution. Following the wording suggested in Kennedy & Piette (2015), we refer to Wyatt's analytical study as the low collision case and van Lieshout's numerical result as the high collision case (or collision-dominated). Furthermore, Kobayashi et al. (2009) suggest a density enhancement (a pile-up effect) can occur near the dust sublimation radius of a P-R drag-in disk (i.e., the inner edge of the P-R disk). As a dust grain drifts close to the sublimation radius and starts to sublimate (i.e., reducing its size), the radiation force on the dust grain becomes stronger and temporar- ily halts its inward migration; therefore, a ring near the sublimation radius can form. The sublimation radius and the enhancement factors depend on the grain composi- tion. Refractory materials like silicate and carbon grains can give an enhancement factor up to ∼4 -- 6 (Kobayashi et al. 2011). Based on the theoretical models described above, we construct the SED of the P-R component in two parts. The first part is the drag-in disk component that has a constant surface density, starting from ∼10 AU (the inner boundary of the asteroid belt) to ∼0.23 AU (the sublimation radius for silicate-like grains when they reach ∼1300 K), and is composed of a population of astronom- ical silicates in a power-law size distribution with a slope of −5.5, and with sizes ranging from 3 to 10 µm. The choices of grain size parameters follow the recipe devel- oped by Wyatt (2005) and van Lieshout et al. (2014) where grains with β = 0.5 are the most dominant sizes as the product of collisional cascades, hence, they con- tribute the most emission from the drag-in disk (see Fig- ure 5 in van Lieshout et al. 2014). The second part is for the density enhancement near the silicate sublimation radius. We place a narrow ring at 0.23 AU with a width of 0.035 AU (i.e., ∆r/r ∼0.15) to mimic the pile-up ef- fect. For simplicity, we adopt the same grain parameters as in the drag-in disk for this pile-up ring. We then adjust the amount of material in each of these components in the combined SED: the asteroid belt (same as before, just different normalization), the drag- in disk and the pile-up ring. To make sure these SED parameters produce a vertical optical depth distribution that is consistent with the theoretical expectation, we also compute the corresponding optical depth in the SED 7 Figure 5. Optical depth in our SED models in comparison with the low collisional rate case (long dash line) and high collisional rate case (dash-dot line) calculations. The model with a pile-up ring (upper panel of Figure 6) is shown as the dash line, and the model without a pile-up ring (bottom panel of Figure 6) is shown as the solid line. Both SED models have the same asteroid belt (at ∼13 AU) and hot ring (at ∼0.1 AU). model as following: σndr 2πr amax(cid:90) τ (r) = = Σ(r) Qabsπa2f (a)da, (1) sponding surface density distribution (i.e., Σ(r) =(cid:82) ndz where n is the dust number density and Σ(r) is the corre- amin ), σ is the cross section of a particle, i.e., 2πa2Qabs for a grain radius of a and absorption coefficient Qabs, and f (a) is the normalized grain size distribution. The inte- gration limits are the grain size boundaries used in the SED model; i.e., for the drag-in disk, the limits are 3 and 10 µm for astronomical silicates. We assume a constant surface density in the P-R disk; therefore, the resultant optical depth is flat for this part. Figure 5 shows the model optical depth distribution for two of the fits in comparison with the theoretical values for the low and high collisional rate cases. As shown in Figure 5, the material required in the SED fit for the P-R disk is lower than the maximum amount from the low collision case, but higher than the collision-dominated case at distances far way from the asteroid belt. The final component in our model is the narrow ring that gives rise to the K-band excess. According to the modeling in Rieke et al. (2015), nano grains can be photo- electrically charged and magnetically trapped inside the dust sublimation radius (∼0.23 AU for silicates or ∼0.1 AU for carbon-like grains around Fomalhaut) under a nominal condition (a dipole magnetic field of 1 G around an A-type star), and the gyroradius (i.e., the inner edge of the trapped particles) could get as close as 0.05 AU. For simplicity, we adopt a constant-surface-density ring from 0.1 to 0.15 AU, composed of amorphous carbon nano grains with sizes ranging from 0.01 µm (10 nm) to 0.05 µm (50 nm) in an a−4 size distribution. The exact grain composition and size parameters do not have a huge impact on the SED model as long as they produce a Rayleigh-Jeans-like spectrum from ∼2 -- 10 µm that best fits the K-band interferometric measurement. There are four individual components in our final SED model: the asteroid belt, the P-R disk, the pile-up ring, and the magnetically trapped hot ring. As a result, many combinations of the scaling for each of the com- ponents (i.e., the total dust mass) give satisfactory fits 0.11.010.0radius (AU)10−610−510−410−3τ at 0.55 µmSED models Low Collision CaseHigh Collision Case8 Su et al. Figure 7. Null levels measured by the KIN in 2008 (squares with error bars) from Mennesson et al. (2013) in comparison with the model null levels (lines). The upper panel shows the short (58 m) baseline result, while the lower one is for the long (76 m) baseline result. Our best-fit models are shown as the solid line (without a pile-up ring, i.e., the bottom panel of Figure 6) and the dotted line (with a pile-up ring, i.e., the top panel of Figure 6). The null levels from the Lebreton et al. (2013) model are also shown (the thick dashed line) for comparison. especially, the model with a pile-up ring simply gives slightly higher null levels than those of the model with- out. Our SED model for the pile-up ring (the upper panel of Figure 6) represents the maximum amount of emission in the model that is consistent with the overall SED. This model gives an enhancement factor of ∼10 in the optical depth, which is the most extreme case found in the study of Kobayashi et al. (2011) while a typical enhancement around an A-type star for silicate grains is ∼3. Since the expected emission from the maxi- mum pile-up ring is very minimal compared to the nano- grain hot ring and the P-R disk (see the upper panel of Figure 6), the available measurements cannot determine whether such a pile-up ring exists. (3) The wavelength- dependent behavior in the KIN short baseline measure- ments (the upper panel of Figure 7) is difficult to match with our simple axi-symmetric model. Future observa- tions from LBTI (Hinz et al. 2012) can help to confirm this wavelength-dependent behavior, and provide com- plementary spatial constraints that are crucial to distin- guish between degenerate KIN models (e.g., Defr`ere et al. 2015). Table 2 summarizes the SED parameters in each of the components. Note that the current data do not put a strong constraint on the existence of a pile-up ring near the silicate sublimation radius; we list its SED parame- ters just for the sake of completeness. With or without the ring due to pile-up, our model appears to give a sat- isfactory fit to the KIN data (Figure 7), as does also the Lebreton model (details see Section 5.3). 5. DISCUSSION 5.1. Does the Derived Dust Mass Make Sense? Is the amount of dust in the asteroid belt too much for a belt undergoing normal collisional evolution? A simple way to answer this question is to compare the observed fractional luminosity with the maximum fractional lumi- nosity expected from collisional evolution models, fmax Figure 6. SED models to fit all the excess measurements in Fo- malhaut's inner 20 AU region. The data points are the same as in Figure 3. The total emission (thick dashed line) is the sum of four different components: a 13-AU narrow asteroid belt (solid line), a flat disk due to P-R drag (triple-dot dashed line), and a hot ring composed of magnetically trapped nano grains (dotted line). The top panel shows the model that includes a narrow ring due to the pile-up effect near the inner edge of the P-R disk (dot-dashed line) and the bottom panel shows the same model but without the pile-up ring. in the overall SED, and Figure 6 shows two of them. Our final constraint comes from the spatial information in the KIN measurements. Each of the good-fit SED models produces a slightly different spatial flux distri- bution at the KIN wavelengths (8 -- 13 µm), i.e., different wavelength-dependent null levels (the fraction of trans- mitted flux detected by KIN) at different baselines (res- olutions). We first simulate the high-resolution, face-on model images at 7 -- 14 µm using the best-fit SED models. Assuming that the inner dust structures have the same inclination and position angles as the cold belt (i=66◦ and P.A.=156◦), the model images are then inclined and rotated accordingly. Using these model images, we then compute the expected null levels on the given dates and baselines of the KIN observations (Table 2 of Mennesson et al. 2013), and compare them with the observed levels. Figure 7 shows examples of the comparison. By changing the combination of individual components and the associated SED parameters (like a Gaussian ring vs. a flat disk), we explore the parameter space that the KIN measurements are sensitive to. We find that (1) an extended dust component in the ∼AU region (the proposed P-R disk) is needed to explain the KIN mea- surements, i.e., a hot nano-grain ring at ∼0.1 AU is not enough to produce the KIN signals, corroborating the finding in Mennesson et al. (2013). (2) The KIN mea- surements are not sensitive to the changes in the dust structure within ∼0.3 AU (i.e., the hot and pile-up rings); 1101001000wavelength (µm)100101102103flux density (mJy)Total EmissionAsteriod BeltPR Drag−in DiskPile−Up RingHot Ring1101001000wavelength (µm)100101102103flux density (mJy)Total EmissionAsteriod BeltPR Drag−in DiskHot RingParameters in the four SED components Table 2 q amax [µm] 1000 −3.65 Gaussian Ring −5.5 10 −5.5 Gaussian Ring 10 −4.0 0.05 Flat Disk Flat Disk [M⊕] 1.5×10−5 1.4×10−7 7.1×10−10 8.0×10−11 9 fd Component Dust Type amin [µm] Density Type† Rin/Rp Rout/Rw Dust Mass [AU] [AU] Asteroid Belt P-R Disk Pile-up Ring‡ Hot Ring 8.8×10−6 1.3×10−6 5.2×10−6 9.7×10−4 We use two types of surface density distribution: (1) a Gaussian ring characterized as the peak radius (Rp) and the Silicates Silicates Silicates Carbon 13 0.23 0.23 0.1 0.035 0.15 2 10 0.01 5 3 3 † width (Rw), and (2) a flat disk characterized as the inner (Rin) and outer (Rout) radii. ‡ Current data do not put a strong constraint on the existence of a pile-up ring. (i.e., equation (21) from Wyatt et al. (2007)). After scal- ing for the mass and luminosity of Fomalhaut, we find fmax is ∼1×10−5 for a belt at 10 AU at an age of 450 Myr. The observed fractional luminosity is ∼0.8×10−5 derived from our model, implying the amount of dust observed in the belt does not violate the collisional evo- lution models5. The ∼10 AU ice-line belt can be an in-situ planetesimal belt. The optical depth distribution in our simple P-R disk model (shown in Figure 5) is between the low and high collision cases expected from theoretical calculations ex- cept for the region right interior of the inner belt. We also used a similar gradual curve in that part of the P-R disk, but it made no difference in the output SED and resultant KIN nulls. This is not a surprise given that this region is outside the field of view of KIN, and SED mod- els are not sensitive to changes in small spatial scale. The total derived dust mass in the P-R disk is 1.4×10−7M⊕, which is ∼100 times less than the derived dust mass in the asteroid belt (1.5×10−7M⊕), suggesting the ice-line belt can sustain the mass needed in the P-R disk. Overall the derived dust masses in the asteroid belt and the P-R disk agree with the collisional and dynamical evolution. For the hot ring, our derived mass is 8×10−11M⊕. This value is very similar to the mass (∼10−10M⊕) de- rived from other studies (Absil et al. 2009; Lebreton et al. 2013; Rieke et al. 2015). In other words, the mass required to explain the VLTI K-band excess is on the order of ∼10−10M⊕. The question remains whether the P-R disk can supply enough material to form a nano- grain hot ring. We can estimate the mass flow near the inner boundary of the P-R disk (without a pile- up ring) as c2 Qprτ (r) in the low collisional rate case (equation (9) from van Lieshout et al. (2014)). With L∗ = 17.4 L(cid:12), Qpr = 1 for ∼µm-size grains, and τ ∼ 4×10−6 from our model, the mass flow rate is ∼2×10−12M⊕yr−1 at 0.23 AU (where P-R grains sub- In comparison, the maximum mass flow rate limate). from P-R drag at 0.23 AU is 3×10−11M⊕yr−1, using van Lieshout's equation (11). These rates and the mass re- quired in the hot ring suggest a typical resident time of ∼5 -- 50 years for the nano grains. The lifetime of the trapped nano grains is estimated to be ∼months to years depending on the grain sizes (Rieke et al. 2015). The es- timated resident time is longer than the lifetime of nano grains if they are only supplied from the P-R disk. This implies that the P-R disk in our model can be a source MPR(r) = L∗ 5 The criterion is usually set when fd >100 fmax (Wyatt et al. 2007). to supply the nano grains; however, other mechanisms like star-grazing comets might be needed to supplement this mechanism. 5.2. How Sensitive are These Models to the Adopted Grain Compositions? The choice of the grain composition in the hot ring does not really affect the outcome of the model as long as the output SED is similar to Rayleigh-Jeans or steeper (details see Rieke et al. (2015)). We adopt amorphous carbon grains because they are a common material that has a high sublimation temperature. Other oxides like FeO can also work as well (see the discussion in Su et al. 2013 and Rieke et al. 2015). We adopt only one composition, the silicate-like grains (astronomical silicates), in both the asteroid belt and the P-R disk because they are the most common mate- rial found in interplanetary dust particles (IDPs). As a result, the model SEDs show weak bumps in the 10 and 20 µm silicate features because the smallest size in the model is ∼3 µm, just small enough to give rise to such features. A mixture with modest amounts of organic ma- terial would also produce a similar result with additional adjustments (like the dust sublimation radius) on the ex- act grain properties. The weak silicate features will be washed out when using a mixture with other featureless material. The exact numbers of the best-fit grain prop- erties and density distribution are expected to vary, de- pending on the adopted grain compositions. The overall behavior in the link between the dust-producing asteroid belt and the interior, low-density, P-R disk remains the same. 5.3. Comparison Between Our and Lebreton's Models Lebreton et al. (2013) have presented the most com- plete and detailed model of the Fomalhaut inner debris disk to date. Since their model is different from ours, it is important to clarify what data are included in their fit and the main difference between the two models. The primary data used to constrain Lebreton model come from the spatial constraints from the KIN 8 -- 13 µm mea- surements, the VLTI K-band excess, and the broadband photometry at 24 and 70 µm. They propose two distinct dust populations in the Fomalhaut inner disk: (1) a very narrow ring confined at 0.1 -- 0.3 AU from the star and composed of unbound, very small 0.01 -- 0.5 µm carbon- like grains, and (2) a disk peaked at ∼2 AU with a r−1 density distribution outward and composed of silicates and carbon grains in a very steep power-law size distri- bution (index of −4.8 to −4.1) with a minimum cutoff 10 of ∼ 2 -- 3 µm. Figure 3 also shows their model SED. This model clearly over-predicts the flux in the 15 -- 30 µm range (the IRS data were not used as a constraint), and the 24 µm excess is ∼1 Jy (see their Figure 5), which is higher than the unresolved excess of 0.64 ±0.13 Jy es- timated in Section 4.1. This is likely due to their lower photospheric estimate, ∼2.78 Jy at 24 µm (see their Fig- ure 5). Several scenarios were discussed and explored in Le- breton et al. (2013) to explain the sources of dust in the ∼2-AU region, which include: 1.) in-situ dust produc- tion, i.e., a planetesimal belt at 2 AU6; 2.) P-R drag-in grains from the cold (∼50 K) outer belt; and 3.) plan- etesimal delivery scattered inward by multiple planets inside the cold belt. They ruled out the in-situ dust pro- duction since the observed fractional luminosity is a few orders of magnitude higher than what a 2-AU belt in col- lisional equilibrium can produce at the age of Fomalhaut (450 Myr). In comparison, the derived dust properties in our ice-line belt at ∼10 AU region are consistent with collisional evolution of an in-situ planetesimal belt as dis- cussion in Section 5.1. The P-R drag from the outer belt was also ruled out because the amount of drag-in grains is inadequate to explain the dust level at the 2 AU region. They conclude that inward scattering of planetesimals from the outer belt by a chain of tightly packed planets is marginally adequate. The innermost, hot ring poses more challenges as in other previous studies because its SED requires emission dominated by very small grains that are unstable against photon pressure blowout. Lebreton et al. (2013) include a detailed treatment for the dust sublimation process to produce the very small grains in the hot ring and derive a replenishing rate of ∼8×10−8M⊕yr−1 to sustain the hot ring. Conventional mechanisms to supply such a flow fall far short of this value; for example Lebreton et al. find that, P-R drag from the 2 AU belt is inadequate by nearly four orders of magnitude. Even invoking an evap- orating planet came up short, although the yield from such an event is very uncertain. Bonsor et al. (2014) developed the comet scattering hypothesis further and found that, with some very closely-packed inner planets and an outermost planet migrating into the cold plan- etesimal belt, it could supply a rate slightly more than 10−9M⊕yr−1, still an order of magnitude too small. In addition, this hypothesis depends on an ad hoc arrange- ment of planets and is implausible to be operating equally well around the many other stars with similar very hot excess emission. To mitigate these problems, Lebreton et al. (2013) pro- posed that the very small grains are trapped against es- cape by gas in the hot ring, but this solution has signifi- cant problems. Such a gas disk with normal (hydrogen- rich) abundances would be easily detected in optical emission lines (it would be analogous to the disks around Ae/Be stars -- see, e.g., Mendigut´ıa et al. 2015). Instead, Lebreton et al. (2013) suggest that the gas is the residue from the sublimation of dust, and show that a total mass of 5×10−3M⊕ would then suffice. In this case, emission in the CII I58 µm line would be expected (Zagorovsky et 6 The typical dust temperatures in this region are ∼400 -- 450 K, which is very different from the dust temperature we refer as the ice-line belt. Su et al. al. 2010). Cataldi et al. (2015) have used Herschel/PACS to place an upper limit on the emission from this line from the entire Fomalhaut ring system, and show that the signal from the spaxal centered on the star (see their Figure 1) is even less than from the rest of the cold ring. Assuming the gas coincident with the very hot dust would be at a similar temperature, the upper limit is an order of magnitude lower than the required mass in the gas disk hypothesized by Lebreton et al. (2013). In our model, the excess detected by the long-baseline KIN observation arises from the P-R drag-in grains from the ∼10-AU ice-line belt. These drag-in grains then sub- limate as they get close to the sublimation radius (0.23 AU for silicate-like grains) and become the charged nano grains trapped by the the weak magnetic field of the star as proposed by Rieke et al. (2015), forming the hot ring. The lifetime of these nano grains (months to years) then suggests a replenishing rate of ∼10−10M⊕yr−1. As dis- cussed in Section 5.1, the P-R mass inflow rates are in the range of 10−12− 10−11M⊕yr−1 from the ice-line belt; like star-grazing an additional source of nano-grains, comets, may be needed to supplement the P-R inflow from the ice-line belt. This star-grazing comet delivery is different from the cometary delivery scenario presented in Bonsor et al. (2014) where a very specific planetary configuration is required to sustain the high influx rate of comets. There will be a wide range of planetary con- figurations that both meet the scattering criteria as eval- uated by Bonsor & Wyatt (2012) and allow to scatter a few star-grazing comets per year into the inner part of the Fomalhaut planetary system (including the tightly pack Bonsor et al. (2014) configuration). 5.4. The Ice-line Asteroid Belt -- A Natural Source for the Dust Interior to the Belt The prominent cold belt cannot supply enough mate- rial to the inner 2-AU region as discussed by Lebreton et al. (2013). With our new parameters for the ice-line belt (dust mass of 1.5×10−5M⊕ and collisional time scale of 2×104 yr), the required mass flow rate, ∼10−9M⊕yr−1, is still too high to be sustained by the outer 140 AU cold belt due to PR drag (the maximum mass flow is ∼10−12M⊕yr−1, equation (11) from van Lieshout et al. 2014). Unlike Eri (MacGregor et al. 2015), the 7 mm ATCA observation of Fomalhaut (Ricci et al. 2012) does not reveal any convincing excess emission above the pho- tosphere. Also ionized winds from A-type stars like Fo- malhaut are extremely weak (Babel 1995). Therefore, it is unlikely that stellar-wind drag can aid the P-R drag significantly. An in-situ ice-line belt, as we have demon- strated, is the best alternative to supply the interior dust detected by infrared interferometry. The amount of interior dust that can be delivered from a planetesimal belt may even be overstated by the P-R drag estimates. In our Solar System, the dust level inte- rior to the Kuiper belt is thought to be constant into ∼10 AU, where most of the particles are ejected by Saturn and Jupiter (Moro-Mart´ın & Malhotra 2005), and only a very small amount of the P-R drag-in dust can reach Earth's vicinity (Liou & Zook 1999; Kuchner & Stark 2010; Vitense et al. 2010). These model predictions are consistent with the measurement by the Student Dust Counter (Szalay et al. 2013, 2015) on board the New Horizons Mission. In addition to the denseness of a belt (collision rate), giant planets located interior to a plan- etesimal belt can also reduce the amount of dust interior to the belt. To verify whether the amount of material due to P-R drag interior to a planetesimal belt is lower than the expected value (i.e., a sign of an additional de- pletion mechanism like the presence of giant planet(s)), a detailed collisional cascade calculation is needed. How- ever, such a model requires detailed information about the planetesimal belt (i.e., location and mass) that is currently lacking. 6. CONCLUSION We report an ALMA cycle 1, 870 µm observation cen- tered at the star position of the Fomalhaut planetary sys- tem. We detect a point source, consistent with the bare stellar photosphere, and no extended structures that are brighter than 3σ in the central 15×15 AU region. We evaluate all available measurements to constrain the in- frared excess arising from dust in the inner 20 AU region in Fomalhaut, and conclude that a dust-producing plan- etesimal belt at the ice sublimation temperature (i.e., an asteroid-belt analog) is the most likely origin for the in- frared excess longward at ∼15 µm. The location of the ice-line belt is estimated to be at ∼8 -- 15 AU using SED models with nominal parameters for a narrow belt with a 3σ upper limit of total flux less than 1.3 mJy at 870 µm. Assuming the inner belt has the same orientation as the outer one (inclination and position angles of 66◦ and 156◦), but centered at the star position, we detect a few 1 -- 2σ blobs along the expected disk circumference of a 13-AU belt. Although our SED model suggests such a 13-AU belt might be detected by our cycle 1 data at 1 -- 2σ levels, the putative 13-AU belt needs future confir- mation. We further propose a new coherent model to explain the interferometric hot excesses by connecting the pro- posed asteroid belt to the dust structures inside of it. We suggest that a small amount of material from the ice-line belt can spiral inward under the influence of P- R drag, forming an interior, extended disk composed of dust grains that have β values closer to 0.5. The inner boundary of the P-R disk is set by the dust sublimation radius of the dominant material like silicates (∼0.23 AU around Fomalhaut when grains reach ∼1300 K). We also consider a possible pile-up ring near the silicate sublima- tion radius as proposed by Kobayashi et al. (2009) with an enhancement factor of a few in the optical depth. We show that the required optical depth of such an interior disk (and a pile-up ring) is lower than the maximum al- lowable amount through the P-R drag under the theoret- ical calculations. Finally, the sublimation of these drag- in silicate grains is likely to produce nano carbon-like or FeO-like particles that should be blown out by radia- tion pressure very quickly under a normal circumstance. However, a weak (∼1 G) magnetic field from a fast rotat- ing A-type star like Fomalhaut can efficiently trap these photoelectrically charged nano grains forming a hot ring. The location of the hot ring depends on the magnetic field strength and the grain sublimation temperature. As modeled by Rieke et al. (2015), a ring at ∼0.1 AU and composed of nano, very refractory grains around Foma- lhaut can explain the K-band excess detected by VLTI. The required resident time of the nano grains sustained 11 entirely from the P-R disk is somewhat longer than the collisional lifetime of these nano grains; therefore, addi- tional sources like a few star-grazing comets are needed to explain the hot ring. Combining all these components (the asteroid belt, the P-R disk with and without a pile- up ring, and the hot nano-grain ring), we can simultane- ously obtain good fits to the excess SED and satisfy the spatial constraints set by the KIN measurements. Studying the inner zones in debris disks requires high angular resolution that can only be provided in scat- tered light by ground-based high-contrast imaging fa- cilities and/or HST, and by ALMA in thermal emis- sion. However, the scattered light study of the inner debris structures around A-type stars like Fomalhaut is challenging because the inner debris is intrinsically faint due to lower mass (compared to the outer debris) and lack of efficient scatterers of small grains (typical radi- ation blowout size for Fomalhaut is ∼3 µm). Although future LBTI and JWST mid-infrared observations can trace ∼µm-size grains in the inner zone in great detail, their structures are much more influenced by radiation forces (radiation pressure and P-R drag). Only ALMA can resolve the detailed structure of the asteroid belt by tracing the mm-size grains that show the imprint of extrasolar terrestrial planets through dynamical interac- tions. Knowing the detailed properties of the asteroid belt not only will help us better understand the processes creating tenuous dust structures interior of the belt, but also provides insights into extrasolar terrestrial planets that we cannot probe otherwise. Deeper observations with the full ALMA array have the potential to reveal directly the asteroid belt inferred from our SED models. This paper made use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA 2012.0.00238.S (PI: S.P.L.). ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA), and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada) and NSC and ASIAA (Taiwan), in coopera- tion with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Ob- servatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO, and NAOJ. K.Y.L.S. is grateful for funding from NASA's ADAP pro- gram (grant number NNX11AF73G). Support for G.H.R. is provided by NASA through contract 1255094 and 1256424 issued by JPL/Caltech to the University of Ari- zona. S.P.L thanks the support of the Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST) of Taiwan with Grants NSC 98-2112-M-007-007-MY3, NSC 101-2119-M-007-004 and MoST 102-2119-M-007-004-MY3. REFERENCES Absil, O., Mennesson, B., Le Bouquin, J.-B., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 150 Acke, B., Min, M., Dominik, C., et al. 2012, A&A, 540, AA125 Alekseeva, G. A., Arkharov, A. A., Galkin, V. D., Hagen-Thorn, E. I., et al. 1996, Baltic Ast., 5, 603 Babel, J. 1995, A&A, 301, 823 Backman, D., Marengo, M., Stapelfeldt, K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1522 ApJ, 775, 55 Ballering, N. P., Rieke, G. H., Su, K. Y. L., & Montiel, E. 2013, Boley, A. C., Payne, M. J., Corder, S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, LL21 Bonsor, A., & Wyatt, M. C. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2990 Bonsor, A., Raymond, S. N., Augereau, J.-C., & Ormel, C. W. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2380 Cataldi, G., Brandeker, A., Olofsson, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, L1 12 Su et al. Chiang, E., Kite, E., Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M. Mendigut´ıa, I., de Wit, W. J., Oudmaijer, R. D., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 2126 Mennesson, B., Absil, O., Lebreton, J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 763, 119 Mermilliod, J. C. 1991, "Catalog of Homogeneous Means in the UBV System,", online at Vizier Min, M., Dullemond, C. P., Kama, M., & Dominik, C. 2011, Icarus, 212, 416 730, L29 Morales, F. Y., Rieke, G. H., Werner, M. W., et al. 2011, ApJ, Moro-Mart´ın, A., & Malhotra, R. 2005, ApJ, 633, 1150 Oteo, I., Zwaan, M. A., Ivison, R. J., Smail, I., & Biggs, A. D. 2015, arXiv:1508.05099 Quillen, A. C. 2006, MNRAS, 372, L14 Ricci, L., Testi, L., Maddison, S. T., & Wilner, D. J. 2012, A&A, Rieke, G. H.; Blaylock, M.; Decin, L.; Engelbracht, C. et al. 2008, Rieke, G. H., Gaspar, A., & Ballering, N. P. 2015, 539, L6 AJ, 135, 2245 arXiv:1511.04998 Stapelfeldt, K. R., Holmes, E. K., Chen, C., et al. 2004, ApJS, Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Misselt, K. A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2009, ApJ, Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Malhotra, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 763, 154, 458 487 118 705, 314 Su, K. Y. L., & Rieke, G. H. 2014, IAU Symposium, 299, 318 Szalay, J. R., Piquette, M., & Hor´anyi, M. 2013, Earth, Planets, and Space, 65, 1145 Szalay, J., Piquette, M., & Horanyi, M. 2015, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 46, 1701 van Lieshout, R., Dominik, C., Kama, M., & Min, M. 2014, A&A, 571, A51 Vernazza, J. E., Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 1976,ApJS, 30, 1 Vitense, C., Krivov, A. V., Lohne, T. 2010, A&A, 520, A32 Wiegert, J., Liseau, R., Th´ebault, P., Olofsson, G. et a. Wyatt, M. C. 2005, A&A, 433, 1007 Wyatt, M. C., Smith, R., Greaves, J. S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 569 Wyatt, M. C., Clarke, C. J., & Booth, M. 2011, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 111, 1 Zagorovsky, K., Brandeker, A., & Wu, Y. 2010, ApJ, 720, 923 PASP, 119, 994 1981, A&AS, 45, 5 74 2009, ApJ, 693, 734 Chen, C. H., Mittal, T., Kuchner, M., et al. 2014, ApJS, 211, 25 Defr`ere, D., Hinz, P. M., Skemer, A. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 42 Dermott, S. F., Jayaraman, S., Xu, Y. L., Gustafson, B. A. S., & Liou, J. C. 1994, Nature, 369, 719 Engelbracht, C. W., Blaylock, M., Su, K. Y. L., et al. 2007, Engels, D., Sherwood, W. A., Wamsteker, W., & Schultz, G. V. G´asp´ar, A., Psaltis, D., Rieke, G. H., & Ozel, F. 2012, ApJ, 754, G´asp´ar, A., Rieke, G. H., & Balog, Z. 2013, ApJ, 768, 25 Greaves, J. S., Sibthorpe, B., Acke, B., et al. 2014, ApJ, 791, L11 Hinz, P., Arbo, P., Bailey, V., et al. 2012, Proc. SPIE, 8445, Holland, W. S., Greaves, J. S., Zuckerman, B., et al. 1998, 84450U Nature, 392, 788 1345 ApJ, 775, 56 Johnson, H. L. 1965, Comm. Lun. Plan. Lab., 3, 73 Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M. 2005, Nature, 435, 1067 Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Chiang, E., et al. 2008, Science, 322, Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Fitzgerald, M. P., & Clampin, M. 2013, Kennedy, G. M., & Piette, A. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2304 Kennedy, G. M., & Wyatt, M. C. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3164 Kobayashi, H., Watanabe, S.-i., Kimura, H., & Yamamoto, T. 2009, Icarus, 201, 395 Kobayashi, H., Kimura, H., Watanabe, S.-i., Yamamoto, T., Muller, S. 2011, Earth, Planets, and Space, 63, 1067 Kuchner, M. J., & Stark, C. C. 2010, AJ, 140, 1007 Laor, A., & Draine, B. T. 1993, ApJ, 402, 441 Lebreton, J., van Lieshout, R., Augereau, J.-C., et al. 2013, A&A, Liou, J.-C., & Zook, H. A. 1999, AJ, 118, 580 Liseau, R.; Montesinos, B.; Olofsson, G.; Bryden, G., et al. 2013, 555, A146 A&AL, 549, 7 A&AL, 573, 4 Loukitcheva, M. A., & Nagnibeda, V. G. 2000, "The Solar Cycle and Terrestrial Climate," ESA Publications, 463, 363 MacGregor, M. A., Wilner, D. J., Andrews, S. M., Lestrade, J.-F., & Maddison, S. 2015, ApJ, 809, 47 Marengo, M., Stapelfeldt, K., Werner, M. W., et al. 2009, ApJ, Matthews, B., Kennedy, G., Sibthorpe, B., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 700, 1647 97 McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, 376, 127 Liseau, R.; Vlemmings, W.; Bayo, A.; Bertone, E., et al. 2015, 2014,A&A, 563, 102
1312.1585	1	1312	2013-12-05T15:43:04	Feasibility Studies for the Detection of $O_2$ in an Earth-like Exoplanet	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present the results of simulations on the detectability of $O_2$ in the atmosphere of Earth twins around nearby low mass stars using high resolution transmission spectroscopy. We explore such detectability with each of the three upcoming Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs), i.e. GMT, TMT and E-ELT, and high resolution spectrographs, assuming such instruments will be available in all ELTs. With these simulations we extend previous studies by taking into account atmospheric refraction in the transmission spectrum of the exo-Earth and observational white and red noise contributions. Our studies reveal that the number of transits necessary to detect the $O_2$ in the atmosphere of an Earth twin around M-dwarfs is by far higher than the number of transits estimated by Snellen et al. (2013). In addition, our simulations show that, when accounting for typical noise levels associated to observations in the optical and near-infrared, the $O_2$ A-band at 760 nm is more favorable to detect the exoplanetary signal than the $O_2$ band at 1268 nm for all the spectral types, except M9V. We conclude that, unless unpredicted instrumental limitations arise, the implementation of pre-slit optics such as image slicers appear to be key to significantly improve the yield of this particular science case. However, even in the most optimistic cases, we conclude that the detection of $O_2$ in the atmosphere of an Earth twin will be only feasible with the ELTs if the planet is orbiting a bright close-by (d $\le$ 8 pc) M-dwarf with a spectral type later than M3.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Feasibility Studies for the Detection of O2 in an Earth-like Exoplanet Florian Rodler Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Institut de Cienci`es de l'Espai (CSIC-IEEC), Campus UAB, Fac. Ciencies, C5 p2, 08193 Barcelona, Spain and Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Mercedes L´opez-Morales ABSTRACT We present the results of simulations on the detectability of O2 in the atmosphere of Earth twins around nearby low mass stars using high resolution transmission spectroscopy. We explore such detectability with each of the three upcoming Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs), i.e. GMT, TMT and E-ELT, and high resolution spectrographs, assuming such instruments will be available in all ELTs. With these simulations we extend previous studies by taking into account atmo- spheric refraction in the transmission spectrum of the exo-Earth and observational white and red noise contributions. Our studies reveal that the number of transits necessary to detect the O2 in the atmosphere of an Earth twin around M-dwarfs is by far higher than the number of transits estimated by Snellen et al. (2013). In addition, our simulations show that, when accounting for typical noise levels associated to observations in the optical and near-infrared, the O2 A-band at 760 nm is more favorable to detect the exoplanetary signal than the O2 band at 1268 nm for all the spectral types, except M9V. We conclude that, unless unpredicted instrumental limitations arise, the implementation of pre-slit optics such as image slicers appear to be key to significantly improve the yield of this particular science case. However, even in the most optimistic cases, we conclude that the detection of O2 in the atmosphere of an Earth twin will be only feasible with the ELTs if the planet is orbiting a bright close-by (d ≤ 8 pc) M-dwarf with a spectral type later than M3. Subject headings: astrobiology -- atmospheric effects -- planetary systems -- techniques: spectroscopy 1. Introduction The path to finding exoplanets either inhabited or amenable for life as we know it on Earth in- cludes the detection in their atmospheres of chem- ical compounds such as H2O, CO2, CH4, and O3, known as biomarkers (Schindler et al. 2000, Pavlov et al. 2000, Kaltenegger & Traub 2007, Traub et al. 2008). Another important biomarker is gaseous oxygen, O2, detected by Sagan et al. (1993) while analyzing the spectrum of Earth ob- served by the Galileo probe. In that spectrum O2 appeared to be, together with CH4 in strong ther- modynamical disequilibrium, the strongest indica- tor of life on Earth. O2 has since drawn significant attention because it provides a strong indication of the presence of oxygen-producing forms of life and because it has several spectral absorption bands at visible and near-infrared wavelengths, which can be detected using ground-based telescopes. The most prominent of those bands are the so-called O2 A-band around 760 nm, and the O2 band at 1268 nm, with the A-band being the strongest with 55 strong lines. 1 Several studies have now investigated the de- tectability of O2 for an Earth-like exoplanet in the habitable zone of its host star. The first of those studies was published by Schneider (1994) who analytically calculated the detectability of the O2 A-band by estimating the photometric depth of the absorption produced by the full band, which has a width of ∼ 3 nm. Computing the ratio of the projected surface areas of the planet's atmo- sphere and the disk of the star during a transit, this study concluded that it was possible to detect the O2 A-band with a 2.4 meter space-bound tele- scope, assuming the planet orbits a solar type star at a distance of 2 parsecs or a 0.3 R⊙ star at 10 parsecs. Webb & Wormleaton (2001) refined the Schnei- der (1994) analysis by using empirical observations of the Earth's O2 A-band to simulate the transmis- sion spectrum of the exoplanet and by superim- posing the resultant spectrum with the spectrum of the host star. Their analysis concluded that it is possible to detect the planetary O2 A-band for host stars with R < 0.3 R⊙, although detectabil- ity with current 8-meter class telescopes would be limited to M dwarfs with mv ∼ 10. This study also proposed that a way to confirm that the O2 lines originated in the atmosphere of the exoplanet is that they should be offset from the Earth's own O2 lines by an amount equal to the peculiar ve- locity of the host star1. However, they did not include the telluric O2 A-band in their analysis. A few years later, Kaltenegger & Traub (2009) generated simulations using the Earth's atmo- sphere as proxy to estimate the detectability of biomarkers during the transit of an Earth twin around a Sun-like star and also around M-dwarfs, for a 6.5-meter telescope in space. Their main conclusion was that the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of a single transit would not be enough to detect any spectral features in the atmosphere of an exo- Earth orbiting in the habitable zone of those stars. Instead, multiple transits would be needed, with an estimate of 6 to 192 transits per year for M0V to M9V stars. They also concluded that the spectral features of different molecules in the atmosphere 1References in the literature trace this technique back to an article by Lowell (1905), where he proposes that oxy- gen lines in the atmosphere of Mars could be detected by their Doppler shift with respect to the corresponding tel- luric lines. of an exo-Earth around an M star will be easier to detect in the infrared than in the optical, because the stellar flux peaks in the infrared. Just recently, Snellen et al. (2013) extended previous studies by including the effect of the tel- luric O2 A-band and applying the latest tech- niques to detect the planet's Doppler shift from the ground (e.g. Brogi et al. 2012, Rodler et al. 2012). Their simulations show that it will be pos- sible to detect the O2 A-band in the atmosphere of an Earth twin if a spectrograph with a spec- tral resolving power of R = 100, 000 is installed on the next generation of Extremely Large Tele- scopes (ELTs). In particular, they concluded that the 39-meter E-ELT, will be able to detect the O2 A-band transmission signal of a planet around an M5V star by combining the observations of a few dozen transits. In addition, they remarked that in the case of stars smaller than M7V the O2 might be easier to detect in the O2band at 1268 nm since those stars will be brighter at near-infrared wave- lengths than in the visible. In this paper we further refine the Snellen et al. (2013) simulations by 1) accounting for atmo- spheric refraction effects in the exoplanet's trans- mission spectrum and 2) including the effect of random and correlated (atmospheric and instru- mental) observational noise. In addition, we ex- tend previous studies by exploring the expected performance of instruments for the three upcom- ing ELTs, exploring a range of spectral resolutions, and performing simulations for a range of stellar peculiar velocities and spectral types. Finally, we explore in detail the feasibility of the observations both in O2 A-band and the O2 band at 1268 nm. In sections 2 and 3 we describe the implementa- tion and results of our simulations. A discussion of those results and the optimal observational set-up is given in section 4. 2. Simulations 2.1. Ingredients The first step to perform these O2 detection feasibility studies is to generate a set of hypotheti- cal exo-Earth transiting planet configurations and observational setups. The parameters necessary for the simulations are 1) a model transmission spectrum of the Earth-like planet (which we as- sume to be an Earth twin, including atmospheric 2 conditions and chemistry), 2) a model transmis- sion spectrum of Earth, 3) a model of the spectral emission of the star, including assumptions about the relative velocity of the star with respect to Earth, 4) a telescope+instrument setup configu- ration, and 5) observational noise models. 2.1.1. Exoplanet Model Transmission Spectrum The model atmospheric transmission spectrum of the exo-Earth was calculated adopting a line- by-line radiative transfer model (LBLRTM) code based of the FASCODE algorithm (Clough et al. 2005)2. As molecular database for oxygen models we adopted HITRAN (Rothman et al. 2009). In those calculations we accounted for the ef- fect of refraction in the transmission spectrum of the exo-Earth. As described in Garcia-Munoz et al. (2012), the transmission spectrum of an Earth twin observed transiting its host star will differ from the Earth's transmission spectrum because of refraction. Refraction is the effect by which light crossing the planet's atmosphere near its surface gets deflected by an angle that depends on the properties of the atmosphere itself, the size of the star, and the orbital distance of the planet. This effect causes the atmospheric layers close to the planet's surface to be invisible for a remote ob- server. As a consequence, any chemical species at heights lower than that limit can not be observed. For species distributed over a large range of atmo- spheric heights, as is the case of O2, the depth of their absorption lines will be altered. For e. g., in the particular case of the Earth-Sun system atmo- spheric layers at heights lower than 12-14 km will be invisible to a remote observer seeing the system transit. In the case of smaller stars, i.e. M-dwarfs, where both the radius of the star and the orbital distance of an Earth-like planet in the habitable zone of the system are smaller, only atmospheric altitudes lower than about 5 km appear invisible. In this work we focus on Earth twins orbiting around M-dwarf stars (see section 2.1.3). There- fore, to simulate this refraction effect we only in- tegrate the model transmission spectrum of the exo-Earth at atmospheric layers between 5 km to 2LBLRTM code source available http://rtweb.aer.com/lblrtm description.html fortran platforms. and manuals is runs available on various as and code are source The under 3 85 km from the surface. 85 km marks the end of the Earth's mesosphere, with over 99% of the at- mospheric mass contained below that atmospheric height (Lutgens & Tarbuck 1995). Therefore, the contribution of the atmospheric layers above that height to the transmission spectrum of the planet can be considered minuscule. The resulting model transmission spectrum of the exo-Earth around the O2 A-band as well as the O2 band at 1268 nm are illustrated in the top panels Figures 1 and 2. 2.1.2. Telluric Spectrum The transmission spectrum of Earth (telluric spectrum) was calculated following the procedure outlined by Seifahrt et al. (2010). Like in the pre- vious section, this procedure uses the LBLRTM code developed by Clough (2005) and the trans- mission molecular absorption database HITRAN containing the 42 most prominent molecules and isotopes present in the atmosphere of Earth. As an input to LBLRTM, we adopted a model of the Earth's atmosphere that contains meteorolog- ical information for temperature and pressure as a function of height for an average night at a given observatory. In our case we retrieved the weather information from the Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS). GDAS models are available in 3 hour intervals for any location around the globe3. By employing LBLRTM, we then calculated ab- sorption and emission spectra for a given path through the atmosphere, i.e. for a given airmass. In our model we have assumed that the observa- tions take place at a ground-based observatory at an altitude of about 2500 meters above sea level, and we have accounted for a changing airmass val- ues during the course of the night within the range X = 1.1 to 2. The transmission spectrum around the O2 A-band and the O2 band at 1268 nm for an airmass of 1.3 is illustrated as example in the mid- dle panels of Figures 1 and 2. We note that a few H2O absorption lines appear in the telluric spec- trum around 1290 nm. These lines partly over- lap with the O2 lines and constitute an additional source of noise. In our simulations, we have con- sidered the depth of these lines to be constant for simplicity reasons. In fact, however, the depths of the water absorption lines may strongly vary 3GDAS webpage: http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/READYamet.php i i n o s s m s n a r T i i n o s s m s n a r T x u F l 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 760 762 764 766 Wavelength (nm) 768 770 Fig. 1. -- Top panel: transmission spectrum of the atmosphere of an Earth-like planet around 760 nm. Middle panel: telluric spectrum of our atmosphere for a zenith distance of 30◦ (airmass X = 1.3). Bottom: PHOENIX model spectrum of an M4V star with a surface temperature of Teff = 3000 K, log g = 4.5 dex and solar abun- dance. All spectra are shown at a spectral resolu- tion of R = 100, 000. i i n o s s m s n a r T i i n o s s m s n a r T x u F l 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 1250 1260 1270 1280 1290 Wavelength (nm) Fig. 2. -- Same as in Fig. 1, but for the wavelength regime around 1268 nm. 4 during the course of a night (e.g. Rodler et al. 2012), an effect that should be implemented in fu- ture simulations. 2.1.3. Stellar Spectra To model the emission from the star, we fo- cus on M-type stars with spectral types M1V -- M9V. The reason for this, as already explained by Kaltenegger & Traub (2009) and Snellen et al. (2013), is that the planetary transit depths are in- versely proportional to the squared radius of the star and therefore, the transmission spectrum sig- nal of an exo-Earth will be easier to detect around a star with smaller radius. For a star like the Sun (G2V), the ratio of the areas between the stellar disk and the atmosphere of an exo-Earth's ring is of the order of 5× 105, while for an M1V star that ratio is ∼ 1.25×105, and for an M9V star the ratio drops to ∼ 4×103. We adopted stellar model spectra for effective temperatures and surface pressures corresponding to M1V -- M9V stars using the new library of high- resolution spectra based on the PHOENIX code and presented in Husser et al. (2013). This new library has been generated using a new equation of state, which improves the treatment of chemical equilibrium in stellar atmospheres, and updated atomic and molecular line lists. These new mod- els provide a better match to observed spectra of M dwarfs than the latest PHOENIX (Brott et al. 2005) and ATLAS9 (Castelli et al. 2003) models. For simplicity, we assumed solar abundances in all the models. As an example, we show the model spectrum generated for an M4V star with effective temperature Teff = 3000 K, gravity log g = 4.5 dex and solar abundances in the bottom panels of Fig- ures 1 and 2. 2.1.4. Telescope+Instrument Setup There are three Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs) with diameters 24 meters or larger ex- pected to start operations in the next decade. The smallest of those ELTs is the Giant Magellan Tele- scope (GMT; www.gmto.org) with an effective di- ameter of 24.5 meters. One of the first light instru- ments on the GMT will be G-CLEF (Szentgyor- gyi et al. 2012), which will be a high-resolution spectrograph with resolution modes between R = 25,000 -- 120,000 and spectral coverage between 350 -- 950 nm, suitable to study the O2 A-band. The second largest of the ELTs is the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT; www.tmt.org). Among the TMT's expected suite of instruments the best suited to detect O2 in the atmosphere of an Earth- like planet is the High Resolution Optical Spec- trometer (HROS: Crampton et al. 2008), listed among the telescope's first decade instruments. HROS will provide a resolution of R = 50 000 for a 1 arcsec slit, or R > 90 000 with an image slicer, and spectral coverage between ∼ 310 -- 1000 nm. An image slicer is a device that allows to feed a large fraction of the stellar flux into a narrow slit, thereby avoiding slit losses and at the same time allowing to employ high spectral resolving powers (see e.g. Dekker et al. 2003). The largest of the ELTs will be the European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT), with a diam- eter of 39-meters. In the case of the E-ELT, there are two spectrographs with resolution R > 100 000 being studied on Phase A4, CODEX (Pasquini et al. 2010) and SIMPLE (Origlia et al. 2010). CODEX only covers wavelengths up to ∼ 710 nm, while the wavelength coverage of SIMPLE starts at ∼ 800 nm. Therefore none of these instru- ments include the O2 A-band at 760 nm. SIM- PLE, on the other hand, will cover the O2 band at 1268 nm. A third high-resolution spectrograph called HIRES, is now being proposed as one of the first light instruments for the E-ELT, although the specifications for this instrument are not defined yet. 2.1.5. Noise Models The last of the simulation inputs is noise. The noise in an observed spectrum can be divided into random (white) and correlated (red) noise. While the distribution of white noise is Poissonian and can be reduced by increasing the S/N of the spec- trum, the red noise is not random and cannot be reduced by increasing the S/N. However, the red noise can be related to instrumental and atmo- spheric effects, such as e.g. variations of airmass or changes of the position of the spectrum on the detector. Analysis techniques have improved in recent years to levels where it is now possible to significantly reduce the amount of red noise in the data. In our simulations we have added both sources of noise. White noise is simulated using a random distribution function with a maximum amplitude set by the S/N of the particular model (see sec- tion 2.2). In the case of red noise, its pattern can contain a series of frequencies that depend on the specific cause of the noise for a given dataset. Therefore, we have simulated red noise using the approach described in (Kasdin 1995), by assuming a functional form of 1/f, where f is the frequency. The amplitude of the red noise is set to a fraction of the white noise in an specific model. For our simulations we consider red noise contributions of 0 to 100% of the white noise. Typical red noise levels of ground based data remain of the order of 20% of the white noise in the optical and 50- 100% of the white noise in the near-infrared (see e.g. Pont et al. 2006, Rogers et al. 2009). 2.2. Generation of Model Spectra Using the inputs described above we generate model spectra, C, using a expression of the form C = (cid:16)a (1 + ǫ−1)−1T(cid:17) ⊗ G , (1) where a = (1 + v⋆c−1) S + (cid:0)1 + (v⋆ + vpl)c−1(cid:1) ǫ−1 P . (2) In these equations, c denotes the speed of light, S is the spectrum of the host star, P is the trans- mission spectrum of the planetary atmosphere, and T is the telluric spectrum of Earth for a given airmass. G is the instrumental profile (IP) of the spectrograph. In our simulations, we assume the IP to be a Gaussian function that degrades the spectral resolution of the combined spectrum to a chosen value. The remaining parameters in the equations are v⋆, the relative stellar velocity with respect to Earth (i.e. systemic velocity and barycentric velocity), vpl, the instantaneous radial velocity of the planet with respect to its host star (which is close to 0 km s−1 at a primary transit), and ǫ, the area ratio between the stellar disk and the atmospheric ring of the planet. Once we have computed the spectrum C, we interpolate it onto a pixel grid, which simulates a given instrumental layout. Since the exact pa- rameters of most instruments described in section 2.1.4 are not yet fully defined, we adopt two dif- 4http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/instrumentation/phaseA.html 5 ferent pixel grid scales; one with a velocity res- olution of 0.75 km s−1 pixel−1 and the other 1.2 km s−1 pixel−1. The 0.75 km s−1 pixel−1 grid scale corresponds to the planned scale of G-CLEF for resolutions R > 25, 000 (Szentgyorgyi et al. 2012), while the 1.2 km s−1 pixel−1 grid scale cor- responds to UVES (Dekker et al. 2000), which is currently mounted at the 8.2 Very Large Tele- scopes (VLT) of the European Southern Observa- tory (ESO). The next step is to adjust the flux of the model spectra based on the expected flux of the exo- Earth's host star that is received on Earth. Given that the potential transiting exo-Earth host stars will be at a range of possible distances from Earth, and therefore will have different apparent magni- tudes, we consider a range of brightnesses for stars of a given spectral type. (Snellen et al. 2013) and (Kaltenegger et al. 2009) computed the most likely apparent magnitude of a nearby transiting exo-Earth host star based on the solar neighbour- hood mass function and transit probability of an exo-Earth and they provided detectability estima- tions that are based on that number (see e. g. Sec- tion 3 in Snellen et al. 2013). Here we adopt a different approach and instead of making any assumption about the apparent magnitude of the transiting exo-Earth host star, we assume that such star can be at any distance within 20 pc. Based on the star's distance, we adjust its appar- ent magnitude between 1 and 20 pc 5. The effec- tive temperature and radius of the stars adopted for each spectral type are listed in Table 1. The table also shows the values of the area ratio be- tween the stellar ring and the atmospheric ring of the planet, ǫ, the I-band and J-band magnitudes of each star at 10 pc, the orbital period of a planet in the middle of the habitable zone of the star based on the definition by Kasting (1993), and the du- ration of the transits of such planet. The flux that we finally measure from a star of a given magnitude will depend on the telescope and instrument throughput. Therefore, we estimated 5We start our models at 1 pc based in the assumption that there is no other star closer to the Sun than Proxima Cen- tauri at 1.33 pc. The 20 pc upper limit is chosen because of the faintness of M-dwarfs. In the remaining paper we only consider distances up to 11 pc since exo-Earths around stars further than that distance take too long to observe (see sec- tions 3 and 4). 6 those fluxes using online Exposure Time Calcula- tors (ETC) for each instrument, whenever avail- able. For all ETCs, we assumed a median seeing of 0.8" and airmass values ranging from 1.1 to 2.0. G-CLEF already has an ETC6, while for SIMPLE, we adopted the throughput value estimates listed on the project webpage7. The instrumental layout of HROS has not been published yet; we therefore assumed that HROS will be similar to G-CLEF, with a factor of 1.5 shorter integration times due to the larger diameter of the TMT with respect to the GMT. For a spectrograph with a UVES- like layout, we used the UVES ETC8 and scaled the results accordingly to the diameter ratio be- tween the ELT and the VLT with 8.2 m. For this instrument, we calculated the S/Ns for different slit widths, resulting in different spectral resolv- ing powers. In addition, we also determined the S/N when employing the UVES image slicer #3, which has a resolution of R = 110, 000 (Dekker et al. 2003). With the ETCs we estimated the exposure time needed to attain the maximum number of counts for each star's apparent magnitude, but at the same time avoiding reaching typical non-linearity regimes of 36 000 ADU and 12 000 ADU (in the brightest pixel on the chip) in a single exposure, respectively for the CCDs and near-infrared de- tectors. We furthermore accounted for the inte- gration time and the dead time between two ex- posures to estimate the observations duty cycle for each star. While for CCDs we assumed a dead time of 15 seconds and a read-out noise of 5 elec- trons per exposure, we accounted for a dead time of 10 seconds and a read-out noise of 10 electrons for infrared detectors. The maximum single expo- sure time was chosen to be 600 seconds, since at longer exposures the radial velocity shift of the re- mote planet would smear out the absorption lines in its atmospheric spectrum. Combining the duty cycle of each star with the flux collected per integration we obtained the total number of photons collected during the duration of one transit (see last column in Table 1). The duty cycles for each star, for each instrument, are sum- ETC version 1.0; 6G-CLEF http://alerce.astro.puc.cl/gclef.html 7SIMPLE http://simple.bo.astro.it/ 8ETC http://www.eso.org/observing version 3.2.13; Website: marized in Tables 2 and 3. The remaining columns in these tables are explained in section 3.4. Finally, we added Poisson noise and red noise to each model based on their flux levels (i.e. S/N), following the description in section 2.1.5. Before adding the noise, we scaled each spectrum in such a way that the actual S/N per spectral pixel cor- responded to the square root of the flux at that pixel. This approach ensures that regions of tel- luric lines as well as stellar absorption lines have a higher noise and a lower S/N than the continuum. 2.3. Data sets and their analysis We generated data sets simulating transmission spectra of planetary transits using eqs. 1 and 2 with the following range of parameters, v⋆ = −150 to 150 km s−1, ǫ = 4 × 103 − 5.2 × 105, depending on the spectral type of the host star, and spectral resolutions of R = 60, 000 − 110, 000, as well as a set of S/N levels including red noise contributions from 0 to 100% of the white noise level. In each data set, we simulated the observations during a night. Hence, each data set consisted of a series of spectra, which differed from each other by the airmass and the instantaneous radial velocity shift of the planetary transmission spectrum (vp) with respect to its host star during transit. Addition- ally, we factored in the effects of the change of the barycentric velocity of the star plus its planet dur- ing the course of a night, which is of the order of a few times 100 m s−1. Furthermore, to rule out se- lection effects coming from the adopted pixel grid, we also varied the zero-point of the pixel grid up to the average velocity span of one pixel. The duration of the datasets corresponds to twice the duration of the transits listed in the last column of Table 1. To analyze each transit dataset in search for the extraterrestrial signal of O2, we followed the approach outlined in Rodler et al. (2012, 2013) and removed both a model telluric spectrum and a model stellar spectrum from each synthetic spec- trum, thereby calculating a residual spectrum which -- ideally -- only contained the transmis- sion spectrum of the planet, plus noise. We then carried out cross-correlations between the resid- ual spectrum and the transmission model spec- trum of the exo-Earth, and determined the cross- correlation function. For all spectra of each data set, we then summed up the cross-correlation func- 7 tions in the rest frame of the planet and deter- mined the radial velocity value that yielded the highest correlation (candidate feature). To determine the number of false positives (i.e. the confidence level of the candidate feature), we employed a bootstrap randomization method (e.g. Rodler et al. 2013). Random values of the or- bital phases were assigned to the observed spec- tra, thereby creating N different data sets (N = 100, 000 in our analyses). Any signal present in the original data was then scrambled in these ar- tificial data sets. For all these randomized data sets, we re-ran the data analysis in the given pa- rameter search ranges and located the candidate feature with its maximum value. The confidence level of the candidate features was estimated to be ≈ 1 − FAP = 1 − m/N , where FAP is the false alarm probability and m is the number of the best fit models having a peak value larger or equal than the peak value of the cross-correlation function found in the original, unscrambled data sets. A detection is considered significant when the signal is at least 3σ, which corresponds to a FAP of ≤ 0.0027. 3. Results Using the simulations described above, we have investigated a series of questions pertaining the successful ground-based detection of O2 in the at- mosphere of an Earth twin around a nearby star. Those questions include the optimal spectral res- olution of the observations, the limitations im- posed by the relative radial velocity of the star and Earth, the limitations imposed by the depth of the telluric O2 lines, and the number of transits we need to observe to achieve at least a 3σ detec- tion in the presence of white and red noise. The answers to those questions are provided in Figures 3-8 and Tables 2-4, and are also described in detail in the text below. The simulations were carried out for G-CLEF mounted on the 24m GMT, for HROS on the TMT assuming an instrument configuration similar to G-CLEF, and for three instruments mounted on the E-ELT; the near-infrared spectrograph SIM- PLE and two hypothetical high-resolution spec- trographs in the visual, a G-CLEF-like instrument and UVES-like instrument. Host Star and Habitable Zone Planet Parameters Table 1 spectral type Teff (K) R (R⊙) ǫ MI (mag) MJ (mag) P (d) transit duration (h) G2V M1V M2V M3V M4V M5V M6V M7V M8V M9V 5800 3600 3400 3250 3100 2800 2600 2500 2400 2300 1 0.49 0.44 0.39 0.26 0.20 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.08 520 000 125 000 101 000 80 000 35 000 21 000 12 000 7 500 6 000 4 000 4.1 7.7 8.3 8.8 10.0 11.2 12.4 13.6 13.9 14.7 3.6 6.4 6.5 7.1 7.9 8.6 10.1 10.7 11 11.6 365.2 43 33 27 16 9.5 6.0 4.1 3.3 1.9 13.1 4.0 3.4 3.0 2.1 1.5 1.1 0.78 0.69 0.43 Simulations for E-ELT spectrographs in the visual† Table 2 sp. type obs. time (h) duty cycle transits time (years) obs. time (h) UVES-like design G-CLEF-like design duty cycle transits time (yrs) G2V M1V M2V M3V M4V M5V M6V M7V M8V M9V 840 110 98 88 43 46 43 35 34 29 0.05 0.58 0.69 0.79 0.92 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 65 28 29 29 21 31 39 45 48 66 ≥ 65 ∼ 29 ∼ 23 ∼ 19 ∼ 8 ∼ 7 ∼ 6 ∼ 5 ∼ 4 ∼ 3 429 67 62 57 29 31 30 24 25 22 0.08 0.71 0.80 0.87 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 34 17 19 19 14 21 27 31 36 50 ≥ 33 ∼ 18 ∼ 15 ∼ 13 ∼ 6 ∼ 5 ∼ 4 ∼ 3 ∼ 3 ∼ 2 †For a velocity span of 1.2 km s−1 pixel−1 (UVES-like design, left) and 0.75 km s−1 pixel−1 (G-CLEF-like design, right). Numbers are given for 5 pc distance. Simulations for G-CLEF @ GMT and HROS @ TMT Table 3 sp. type obs. time (h) duty cycle transits time (years) obs. time (h) duty cycle transits time (yrs) G-CLEF @ GMT HROS @ TMT G2V M1V M2V M3V M4V 5V M6V M7V M8V M9V 470 133 133 130 70 79 75 61 69 67 0.18 0.86 0.91 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 37 33 40 44 34 53 68 78 100 154 ≥ 37 ∼ 35 ∼ 31 ∼ 28 ∼ 14 ∼ 12 ∼ 10 ∼ 8 ∼ 8 ∼ 7 448 97 95 91 48 53 51 41 46 45 0.13 0.81 0.87 0.92 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 35 24 28 30 23 36 46 53 67 104 ≥ 35 ∼ 26 ∼ 23 ∼ 20 ∼ 9 ∼ 9 ∼ 7 ∼ 6 ∼ 6 ∼ 5 For a distance of 5 pc 8 Table 4 Simulations for SIMPLE @ E-ELT Sp. type obs. time (h) duty cycle transits time (yrs) M3V M4V M5V M6V M7V M8V M9V 713 173 99 38 21 18 10 0.12 0.41 0.69 0.75 0.84 0.87 0.91 238 82 66 35 27 26 24 ≥ 100 ∼ 33 ∼ 15 ∼ 5 ∼ 3 ∼ 2 ∼ 1 For a distance of 5 pc 3.1. Spectral Resolution We used the UVES ETC to investigate the ef- ficiency of observations with an UVES-like instru- ment at different spectral resolutions. We carried out simulations for resolutions between 60,000 and 110,000, rescaling the S/N of the contimuun of each spectrum to the aperture of the E-ELT. Fig- ure 3 shows the result of those tests for the partic- ular case of an Earth twin orbiting around an M4V star at a distance of 5 pc. In this case, the opti- mal spectral resolution appears to be R = 80, 000, which corresponds to the best trade-off between slit losses and the spectral smearing of the exo- Earth's signal. The plot also shows, for compar- ison, the result of the same test when using an image slicer -- in this particular case we simulated image slicer #3 described in Dekker et al. (2003). When using the image slicer, which is only used at resolution R = 110, 000, the efficiency of the observations improves by a factor of two with re- spect to the efficiency of the instrument at that same resolution when using only a slit. We note that this result represents the ideal case, i.e. we did not account for possible changes of the instru- mental profile induced by an image slicer, which might hamper the data analysis. The tests also show that the use of the image slicer improves the overall efficiency of the observations, where only about 21 transits are necessary to achieve a 3σ detection of the exo-Earth's atmosphere, while 25 transits are necessary to achieve the same preci- sion level when just observing at a spectral reso- lution of R = 80, 000 without an image slicer. The result of these tests are instrument-specific and similar tests will have to be done for other in- struments to determine the optimal resolution for this type of science once their final specifications are defined. However, we can argue that employ- ing pre-slit optics, such as image slicers capable of concentrating a larger fraction of the stellar flux into the slit, can significantly reduce the number of transits needed for a successful detection, for all instruments. 3.2. Relative Radial Velocity The detectability of an Earth twin depends, among other things, on how many of its O2 lines can be observed. Our atmosphere produces the same absorption features (telluric lines), at the same wavelength positions (cf. Figs. 1 and 2), and in addition, the lines have some intrinsic width. Therefore, the Earth twin spectrum will be only detectable when its lines are Doppler shifted with respect to the telluric lines by certain amounts. To investigate this effect we generated a set of simulations in which the spectrum of the Earth twin was shifted with respect to the spectrum of Earth by values of the relative velocity between the host star and Earth between -150 km s−1 and +150 km s−1, and determined the fraction of lines that would appear blended in each case. The re- sults of those simulations are illustrated in Figure 4 for both the O2 A-band and the O2 band at 1268 nm. In the case of the O2 A-band, we find that most lines will appear blended as long as the rel- ative velocities are < ± 15 km s−1. Line blend- ing becomes significant again (with about 50% of the lines blended) at relative velocities of about ± 50 km s−1, coinciding with the average separation between individual lines in the O2 A-band spec- trum. The optimal relative velocity regimes (with 10% or less of the lines blended), appear to be -15 to -30 km s−1 and 15 to 30 km s−1. 9 In the case of the O2 band at 1268 nm, which are narrower than the A-band lines, we find that relative radial velocities in the regimes around - 85 to -65 km s−1, -10 to 10 km s−1, and 65 to 85 km s−1 are also significantly blended. Stars with any other relative velocity value can be ob- served with the guarantee that no more than about 20% of the O2 lines will be blended. 3.3. Telluric Line Depths Another effect affecting the detectability of an Earth twin is noise introduced by telluric con- tamination. In other words, telluric lines block a large fraction of the host star's light, causing the S/N of its spectrum to drop significantly around those wavelengths. In the case of the O2 band at 1268 nm, telluric contamination around 1268 nm causes the S/N ratio to drop to 0.3 with respect to the S/N ratio in the continuum. In the case of the O2 A-band, telluric contamination around 760 nm fully blocks all incoming light at some wave- lengths (see middle panels in Figures 1 and 2). The best strategy to avoid this source of noise dur- ing the data analysis process is to skip wavelength regions where the S/N of the observed spectrum drops below a certain value. Therefore, we de- fine a cut-off parameter with respect to the S/N of the spectral continuum for which lines (or por- tions of the spectrum) to keep during the analysis. The optimum value of this cut-off parameter is a trade-off between keeping a large enough number of absorption features from the planet and avoid- ing noisy regions due to strong telluric contami- nation. Adopting a non-optimal cut-off parameter will result in strongly suppressing the exo-Earth's signal and might lead to a non-detection (i.e. to a detection with confidence level less then 3σ). To determine the value of this cut-off parame- ter we analyzed different datasets by masking out different wavelength regions in which the telluric absorption lines dropped below a certain amount, e.g. a cut-off parameter of 0.5 corresponds to masking out all the wavelength regions for which the S/N drops by 50% with respect to that of the continuum. The result of these tests is shown in Figure 5, where we represent the FAP of the exo- Earth's detection as a function of the cut-off pa- rameter in S/N units (i.e. a value of 1 for the cut-off parameter means that even the continuum is masked out). The figure indicates that the best 10 without IS with IS s t i s n a r t f o r e b m u n 35 30 25 20 60 80 70 100 spectral resolution (R/1000) 90 110 Fig. 3. -- Simulation results for the number of transit observations necessary to obtain a 3σ de- tection of O2 around 760 nm in the atmosphere of an Earth twin orbiting a M4V star at 5pc. The instrumental setup is an UVES-like instrument mounted on the 39-m E-ELT. The open circles show the result of the simulations for spectral reso- lutions between 60,000 and 110,000. The filled cir- cle shows the result of the same simulations when an image slicer at a resolution of 110,000 is used. These simulations assume a relative radial veloc- ity for the star of 20 km s−1 with respect to Earth and no red noise. -150 1 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 O2 A-band s d n e b l e n i l f o n o i t c a r f s d n e b l e n i l f o n o i t c a r f 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 O2 B-band 0 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 relative radial velocity [km/s] Fig. 4. -- Plot showing the normalised fraction of line blends between the telluric spectrum and the transmission spectrum of the Earth twin as a func- tion of the relative radial velocity between the host star and Earth. The upper panel corresponds to the O2 A-band at 760 nm and the bottom panel to the O2 band at 1268 nm. Based on this plot, observations are best suited when the relative ve- locity of the star is between ±(15 and 30) km s−1 in the case of the A-band, and for velocities out- side the ranges ±(85 to 65) km s−1 and -10 to 10 km s−1 in the case of the O2 band at 1268 nm. value of the cut-off parameter is approximately 0.4 times the S/N of the continuum. 3.4. Number of Transits The last question we addressed is how many transit observations are necessary to achieve at least a 3σ detection of an Earth twin's atmosphere, and what will be the time span needed to collect those many transits. To estimate the number of transits needed, we focused first on the 760 nm O2 A-band and assumed a transiting planetary sys- tem with an Earth twin in its habitable zone, at a distance of 5 parsecs from Earth and moving away from us with a relative velocity of 20 km s−1. We determined the duty cycle of the observations by assuming an instrument dead time of 15 sec after each exposure (see section 2.2). To calculate the number of transits, we divided the observing time by the transit duration of the planet as a func- tion of stellar spectral type. The values for the orbital periods and transit durations were taken from Kaltenegger & Traub (2009) and are pro- vided in Table 1. To estimate the overall time span of the observations, we factored in the or- bital period of the planet and assumed that only every 9th transit can be observed, after account- ing for object visibility from Earth, transit occur- rence, and the relative radial velocity between the target and Earth (see also Section 4). The results are summarised in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2 is split into two halves; the left-hand side lists the results for a spectrograph with a UVES-like layout (i.e. spectral resolving power of R = 110, 000, image slicer #3, velocity span of 1.2 km s−1 pixel−1) installed on the E-ELT, while the right-hand side shows the values de- termined for a spectrograph with a design simi- lar to G-CLEF (i.e. R = 100, 000, velocity span of 0.75 km s−1 pixel−1), also on the E-ELT. G- CLEF's design seems to be significantly more effi- cient. In this table, and in Table 3, we also show the times needed for an Earth twin orbiting a G2V star. In this case, because of the very low duty cycle and the very shallow transit depth, it would take over 30 transits, and therefore more than 30 years to detect O2 with 3σ confidence. Once we also factor in for the number of observable transits from the ground, these observations would take many decades. For M1V - M3V stars we estimate 11 the time span of the observations to be ∼ 13 - 19 years. For later type M-dwarfs, where the or- bital periods of planets in their habitable zones are shorter, this number drops significantly to about 6 years for M4V stars and about 2 years for M9V stars. For a planet orbiting a M4V star, it would require a minimum of 14 transits to detect O2 with 3σ confidence in its atmosphere. In the case of M9V stars, which are intrinsically fainter, it would take at least 50 transits. Figure 6 shows the number of transits required for a 3σ detection with the two instrumental se- tups in Table 2, as a function of distance and for spectral types M3V through M7V. Planets around an M3V star need more transits at very low dis- tances due to a decrease in the duty cycle of the observations, i.e. the stars become too bright and the observing times need to be short to avoid sat- uration. Therefore most of the observing time in those cases is spent on instrument readouts. The same applies for earlier type stars. The figure also shows how for stars located at distances larger than about 8-10 parsecs, the number of transits necessary to achieve a 3σ detection becomes too large. Table 3 is similar to Table 2, but showing the results for two other observational configurations; the left-hand side of the table shows the results of our simulations for G-CLEF mounted on the GMT. The right-hand side shows the result of the simulations for HROS mounted on the TMT. For both spectrographs we assume a spectral res- olution of R = 100, 000 and a velocity span of 0.75 km s−1 pixel−1. The top panel of Figure 7 shows the number of transits required for a 3σ de- tection with G-CLEF on the GMT as a function of distance and, as in Figure 6, for spectral types M3V through M7V. As expected, in this case, the number of transits necessary to achieve a detection is larger, by approximately a factor of two, than the number of transits necessary with an instru- ment like G-CLEF in the larger aperture E-ELT (also see bottom panel of Figure 6). The number of transits in Figure 7 decrease by a factor of about 1.5 for the case of HROS mounted on the TMT. Finally, Table 4 summarizes the results of our simulations for the near-IR spectrograph SIMPLE to be mounted on the E-ELT. In this case the sim- ulations focus on the 1268 nm O2 band, while we still assume a transiting planetary system with an 12 Earth twin in its habitable zone, at a distance of 5 parsecs from Earth and moving away from us with a relative velocity of 20 km s−1. We adopted a spectral resolution of R = 100, 000, a velocity span of 1.2 km s−1 pixel−1 and a dead time be- tween two subsequent exposures of 10 seconds. We only carried out simulations for stars with spectral types later than M3V, since the number of transits necessary for an M3V star was already over 200. The results on that table reveal that using the O2 band at 1268 nm to detect O2 in the atmosphere of an Earth twin will require a significantly larger amount of telescope time than observations of the O2 A-band for all spectral types earlier than M7V. The bottom panel of Figure 7 shows he number of transits required or a 3σ detection with SIMPLE as a function of distance and for spectral types M5V through M9V. In this case, the number of transits decreases steadily with increasing spectral type. 3.4.1. The Effect of Red Noise Tables 2, 3, and 4, as well as Figures 6 and 7 show the results for the ideal case, i.e. without any contributions from correlated (red) noise. How- ever, typical red noise levels are 20% and 50% of the white noise level for data recorded in the vi- sual and near-infrared, respectively (Pont et al. 2006, Rogers et al. 2009). The higher red noise level in the near-infrared wavelength regime is due telluric contamination and to a larger extent, due to detector noise. To make the simulations more realistic, we added different levels of red noise to the simulated data sets and analysed them as de- scribed before. Figure 8 shows the difference in the amount of observing time required to achieve a 3σ detection as the red noise levels increase. For a red noise level of 20% of the white noise level, the observing time required to attain a 3σ detection rises by a factor of ∼ 1.4. This means that for a red noise level of 20% of the white noise level, the observing times as well as the number of transits shown in Tables 2 and 3 and in Figure 6 and 7 (top panel) needs to be multiplied by this value. This effect becomes more severe for higher red noise levels. e.g. for correlated noise levels of 50% and 100% of the white noise level, the time factor in- creases by ∼ 2.6 and ∼ 9, respectively. When comparing the results determined by accounting for typical red noise levels (20% of the white noise level in the visual, 50% of the white noise level at near-infrared wavelengths), we find that the lowest time span of observa- tions is achieved with a G-CLEF-like spectrograph mounted on the E-ELT for all M-dwarfs with spec- tral types M1V-M8V. Observations in the O2 band at 1268 nm are more efficient than in the visual only for M9V stars (see Figure 9). 4. Discussion & Conclusions We have carried out detailed feasibility studies to probe molecular oxygen in the atmosphere of an Earth-analogue orbiting M-dwarfs with future instruments to be mounted on upcoming ELTs. In our simulations, we factored in the stellar spectra for different spectral types, the telluric spectrum of the Earth, different instrumental settings of pos- sible future instrumentation, refraction effects in the Earth analog's atmosphere, and a variety of noise models, including the effects of correlated noise (red noise) in the data. When we compare our work to previous, similar studies, these are the most detailed simulations to date. A result of our investigation is that a G-CLEF- like instrument mounted on an E-ELT is the best suited for the detection of O2 in the atmosphere of an Earth-like planet orbiting M1V-M8V stars. Only for planets orbiting M9V stars, observations carried out in the near-infrared become more effi- cient than in the visual. This is a result of lower red noise levels at visible wavelengths, but the sit- uation could change in the future if infrared red noise levels can be improved to match noise levels in the visible. In that case, near-infrared obser- vations will be more efficient for planets around M7V stars and smaller. Fig. 10 depicts the frequency of M1V to M9V stars in the solar neighborhood9. M3 and M4 dwarfs are the most common sub-types, with more than 25 stars of each spectral type within a dis- tance of 10 pc. When combining this distribu- tion with the results of our simulations, we con- clude that very close-by M4V stars will be the most likely candidates for the detection of oxy- gen in the atmosphere of an Earth-like planet. In just 40 hours of observing time (∼ 20 transits) a 3σ detection of an object at 5 pc from Earth 9Data were (http://www.recons.org). retrieved from the RECONS database 13 could be attained with a G-CLEF-like instrument mounted on the 39 m E-ELT. For this estimation, we assumed a red noise level of 20% of the white noise level. A typical orbital period of a planet lo- cated in the habitable zone around an M4-dwarf is 16 days. Once the object visibility, orbital period and the relative radial velocity are taken into ac- count, we estimate that it would nevertheless take a total time span of observations of ∼ 8 years to accumulate sufficient data for a detection. This number soars up to 175 hours (74 transits) and a time span of roughly 30 years for an object at a distance of 10 pc, which is the most probable distance to find an Earth-analogue around such a star (Kaltenegger & Traub 2009). We compare our results to previous studies by other groups. Snellen et al. (2013) carried out simulations with the goal to detect the O2 A- band in the atmosphere of Earth-analogues orbit- ing around M4V and M6V stars, with apparent magnitudes I = 10 and I = 11.8, respectively. According to their results, it takes about 4 to 15 transits to attain a 3σ detection of O2. They as- sumed a line contrast ratio between stellar contin- uum and the deepest absorption lines of 20, 000, which corresponds to ǫ ≈ 35, 000 in the case of a spectral resolution R = 100, 000, which causes a line depth of 0.6 for the deepest lines with respect to the stellar continuum (c.f. line depths in Fig. 1, top panel). Furthermore, they assumed that the transit duration was 1.4 hours for planets orbit- ing those types of dwarfs. Adopting the values for ǫ and the transit duration listed in Table 1, our studies reveal that it takes a total of about 42 and 60 transits for a 3σ detection of oxygen in the atmosphere of an Earth-like planet orbiting an M4V and M6V stars, respectively. These re- sults are for the ideal case, i.e. without red noise and a G-CLEF-like spectrograph mounted on the 39m E-ELT. If we include a typical 20% red noise contribution in these studies, the numbers rise to 60 and 84 transits (i.e. 12-25 years), respectively for M4 and M6 dwarfs. Our results are far less optimistic than those presented by Snellen et al. (2013). Ideally, the incoming flux from the planet host star should find its way to the data analysis. To record high-resolution spectra of a star, it is neces- sary to carry out the observations through a nar- row slit (or fiber). This, however, means that only a fraction of the stellar light is used -- and in case of bad seeing conditions, it might happen that more than 60% of the incoming light is lost. To avoid such an unfavorable situation, pre-slit optics should be employed which enable to feed more than 90% of the photons of the star into the narrow slit. This can be achieved with im- age slicers or multiple fibers, although in this last case there is some concerns that transmission dif- ferences between fibers might affect the results. Such potential problems will have to be evaluated before hand. Since the designs of most of the high-resolution spectrographs to be mounted on the ELTs haven't been fixed yet, we strongly rec- ommend to include pre-slit optics to collect most of the stellar light and feed it into the spectro- graph. Based on our simulations in Figure 3, the usage of pre-slit optics could improve the required number of observations by a factor of two. In this estimation, however, we have not accounted for possible irregularities in the IP induced by an im- age slicer, which might represent a further noise source. At this point, we want to emphasize that our simulations represent a somewhat ideal case, i.e. stable instrument configurations and perfectly fit- ting models in the data analysis. Our simulations need to be redone once the configuration details of the spectrographs are known. For the planning of the observations, we find that a very important parameter to take into ac- count is the relative radial velocity of the star with respect to the Earth. That relative radial velocity is the combination of the systemic radial velocity of the star (vr) and the instantaneous barycentric velocity vbary. Our atmosphere produces the same line pattern that we search for in the atmosphere of a remote planet. At some wavelengths, the tel- luric contamination almost absorbs all the incom- ing flux, leading to very low S/N ratios in those wavelength regions, which need to be masked out in the data analysis. It is therefore crucial to mini- mize the numbers of absorption line blends by only taking observation when the telluric spectrum and the spectrum of the planet are Doppler shifted by a certain amount. For observations in the visual, we find that the optimum velocity range of the planet host star with respect to the Earth is lim- ited to two small velocity windows, ranging from ±(15 to 30) km s−1. In Figure 11 we show the distribution of ab- solute values of the barycentric radial velocities for a sample of 176 M-dwarfs reported by Chubak et al. (2012). Assuming that the distribution of radial velocities in that sample is representative of all nearby M-dwarfs, we can conclude that the majority of them have barycentric radial velocities between -15 and 15 km s−1. Therefore, what is the amount of time of optimum visibility of those ob- jects, i.e. when they show relative radial velocities of ±(15 to 30) km s−1? To answer this question, we need to account for the barycentric velocity of the Earth, which causes a periodical radial veloc- ity shift with a semi-amplitude Vbary of approxi- mately 29.8 km s−1 for an object located close to the ecliptic plane. However, the semi-amplitude of the barycentric velocity is a function of the ecliptic latitude β (i.e. the angular distance of the object from the orbital plane): Vbary = (29.8 cos βπ 180 ) km s−1. (3) For the vast majority of stars, the semi-amplitude of the barycentric velocity Vbary is between 20 and 29.8 km s−1. Figure 12 shows the amount of time of optimum visibility of an object in units of the yearly observ- ing time available at an ideal observing site. For this estimation, we assumed that the object can be observed at an airmass X ≤ 2 between 2 hours and 8 hours (at opposition with Earth). Further- more, for simplicity we assumed a circular orbit of Earth and factored in the instantaneous value of the barycentric velocity of the object. Figure 12 depicts that for semi-amplitudes of the barycentric velocity of Vbary ≥ 20 km s−1, the atmospheric lines from the planet would be detectable a frac- tion of 0.2 to 0.4 of the time for the majority of the M-dwarfs, which have instrinsic radial veloci- ties between -15 and 15 km s−1. To understand possible error sources in the data analysis, we briefly review the main steps: We re- move both the telluric spectrum as well as the stel- lar spectrum from the data, and finally attempt to retrieve the planetary signature from the resid- ual spectrum via cross-correlation. The removal of both spectra is an iterative process, which in- volves the determination of the IP and the convo- lution of the stellar + telluric model spectra with the IP (the method is outlined in Rodler et al. 14 2013). While the telluric spectrum can be well re- produced with theoretical model spectra, the mod- eling of M-dwarf spectra is still in its infancy. In principle, if the instrument is stable during one night, it would be sufficient to take spectra of the star for some hours before and after the transit, subtract the telluric lines, then co-add these spec- tra to form one high-S/N spectrum for that night, which is then subtracted from the observed spec- trum taken during the transit (cf. procedure used by Rodler et al. 2008). However, this procedure would drastically boost the need of observing time. Detailed studies on the modeling of M-dwarf spec- tra are clearly required. Additionally, it is crucial to discard strong tel- luric features in the data analysis. We want to make future observers aware that regions which show a S/N ratio less than about 0.4 times the S/N ratio in the continuum of the spectrum should be masked out. Adopting a wrong cut-off param- eter causes the the weak planetary signal to be suppressed. Another possible error noise constitutes the model spectrum of the planet atmosphere, which is adopted in the cross-correlation. We are attempt- ing to detect a very weak planetary signal of the planetary atmosphere; the lack of some absorption features in the theoretical model would suppress the planetary signal in the cross-correlation func- tion. To avoid this situation, a large numbers of atmospheric models with different mixing ratios and molecular configurations need to be probed. We conclude that successful measurements of O2 in Earth-like atmospheres with future ground- based instrumentation will be most likely limited to host stars of spectral types later than M3V, which are located at distances less than 8 pc. Our simulations demonstrate, that a 3σ discovery of O2 in the atmosphere of such a planet would re- quire even tenths of transits and several years of observing time at ELTs. We are grateful to the constructive comments of the anonymous referee, who helped us to improve the manuscript. FR acknowledges financial sup- port from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and the "Fondo Eu- ropeo de Desarrollo Regional" (FEDER) through grant AYA2012-39612-C03-01. This research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System 15 Bibliographic Services. REFERENCES Brogi, M., Snellen, I. A. G., de Kok, R. J., Al- brecht, S., Birkby, J., & de Mooij, E. J. W. 2012, Nature, 486, 502 Brott, I. & Hauschildt, P. H. 2005, in ESA Special Publication, Vol. 576, The Three-Dimensional Universe with Gaia, ed. C. Turon, K. S. O'Flaherty, & M. A. C. Perryman, 565 Castelli, F. & Kurucz, R. L. 2003, in IAU Sym- posium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmo- spheres, ed. N. Piskunov, W. W. Weiss, & D. F. Gray, 20P Chubak, C., Marcy, G., Fischer, D. A., Howard, A. W., Isaacson, H., Johnson, J. A., & Wright, J. T. 2012, ArXiv e-prints Clough, S. A. 2005, JQSRT, 91 233 Crampton, D., Simard, L., & Silva, D. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation En- gineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7014, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation En- gineers (SPIE) Conference Series Dekker, H., D'Odorico, S., Kaufer, A., De- labre, B., & Kotzlowski, H. 2000, in Soci- ety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engi- neers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4008, So- ciety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engi- neers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. M. Iye & A. F. Moorwood, 534 -- 545 Dekker, H., Nissen, P. E., Kaufer, A., Primas, F., D'Odorico, S., & Hanuschik, R. W. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation En- gineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4842, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation En- gineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. E. Atad- Ettedgui & S. D'Odorico, 139 -- 150 Garc´ıa Munoz, A., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Bar- rena, R., Montan´es-Rodr´ıguez, P., Mart´ın, E. L., & Pall´e, E. 2012, ApJ, 755, 103 Husser, T.-O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., Homeier, D., Reiners, A., Barman, T., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2013, A&A, 553, A6 Kaltenegger, L. & Traub, W. A. 2009, ApJ, 698, Rogers, J. C., Apai, D., L´opez-Morales, M., Sing, 519 D. K., & Burrows, A. 2009, ApJ, 707, 1707 Kaltenegger, L., Traub, W. A., & Jucks, K. W. 2007, ApJ, 658, 598 Kasdin, J. 1995, in Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 83, Proceedings of the IEEE, 802 -- 827 Lowell, P. 1905, Lowell Obs. Bulletin., No. 17 Lutgens, F. & Tarbuck, E. 1995, The atmosphere: an introduction to meteorology, The Atmo- sphere: An Introduction to Meteorology (Pren- tice Hall) Origlia, L., Oliva, E., Maiolino, R., Gustafsson, B., Piskunov, N., Kochucov, O., Vanzi, L., Min- niti, D., Zoccali, M., Hatzes, A., & Guenther, E. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumen- tation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Pasquini, L., Cristiani, S., Garc´ıa L´opez, R., Haehnelt, M., Mayor, M., Liske, J., Manescau, A., Avila, G., Dekker, H., Iwert, O., Delabre, B., Lo Curto, G., D'Odorico, V., Molaro, P., Viel, M., Vanzella, E., Bonifacio, P., di Mar- cantonio, P., Santin, P., Comari, M., Cirami, R., Coretti, I., Zerbi, F. M., Span`o, P., Riva, M., Rebolo, R., Israelian, G., Herrero, A., Za- patero Osorio, M. R., Tenegi, F., Carswell, B., Becker, G., Udry, S., Pepe, F., Lovis, C., Naef, D., Dessauges, M., & M´egevand, D. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation En- gineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation En- gineers (SPIE) Conference Series Pavlov, A. A., Kasting, J. F., Brown, L. L., Rages, K. A., & Freedman, R. 2000, JGR, 105, 11981 Pont, F., Zucker, S., & Queloz, D. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 231 Rodler, F., Kurster, M., & Barnes, J. R. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 1980 Rodler, F., L´opez-Morales, M., & Ribas, I. 2012, ApJl, 753, L25 Rodler, F., Kurster, M., & Henning, Th. 2008, A&A, 485, 859 Rothman, L. S., Gordon, I. E., Barbe, A., Ben- ner, D. C., Bernath, P. F., Birk, M., Boudon, V., Brown, L. R., Campargue, A., Champion, J.-P., Chance, K., Coudert, L. H., Dana, V., Devi, V. M., Fally, S., Flaud, J.-M., Gamache, R. R., Goldman, A., Jacquemart, D., Kleiner, I., Lacome, N., Lafferty, W. J., Mandin, J.- Y., Massie, S. T., Mikhailenko, S. N., Miller, C. E., Moazzen-Ahmadi, N., Naumenko, O. V., Nikitin, A. V., Orphal, J., Perevalov, V. I., Per- rin, A., Predoi-Cross, A., Rinsland, C. P., Rot- ger, M., Simeckov´a, M., Smith, M. A. H., Sung, K., Tashkun, S. A., Tennyson, J., Toth, R. A., Vandaele, A. C., & Vander Auwera, J. 2009, J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf., 110, 533 Sagan, C., Thompson, W. R., Carlson, R., Gur- nett, D., & Hord, C. 1993, Nature, 365, 715 Schindler, T. L. & Kasting, J. F. 2000, Icarus, 145, 262 Schneider, J. 1994, ApSs, 212, 321 Seifahrt, A., Kaufl, H. U., Zangl, G., Bean, J. L., Richter, M. J., & Siebenmorgen, R. 2010, A&A, 524, A11 Snellen, I. A. G., de Kok, R. J., le Poole, R., Brogi, M., & Birkby, J. 2013, ApJ, 764, 182 Szentgyorgyi, A., Frebel, A., Furesz, G., Hertz, E., Norton, T., Bean, J., Bergner, H., Crane, J., Evans, J., Evans, I., Gauron, T., Jord´an, A., Park, S., Uomoto, A., Barnes, S., Davis, W., Eisenhower, M., Epps, H., Guzman, D., McCracken, K., Ordway, M., Plummer, D., Podgorski, W., & Weaver, D. 2012, in So- ciety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engi- neers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8446, So- ciety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engi- neers (SPIE) Conference Series Traub, W. A., Kaltenegger, M. C., & Jucks, K. W. 2008, SPIE, 7010, 51 Webb, J. K. & Wormleaton, I. 2001, Pasa, 18, 252 This 2-column preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. 16 0.1 P A F 0.01 3σ 0.001 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 cut-off parameter Fig. 5. -- False Alarm Probability (FAP) of the Earth twin's transmission spectral signal detection as a function of the cut-off parameter value. We find that values of the cut-off parameter between ∼ 0.29 and 0.43 give a FAP lower than 0.027, which corresponds to a 3σ detection. The lowest value of the FAP corresponds to a cut-off parameter value of 0.4. s t i s n a r t f o r e b m u n s t i s n a r t f o r e b m u n 50 40 30 20 10 0 50 40 30 20 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 2 4 6 8 10 distance [pc] Fig. 6. -- Number of transits required to mea- sure the 760 nm O2 absorption band with 3σ con- fidence versus distance of the planetary system from Earth. As instrument, we assume a high- resolution spectrograph mounted on the 39-m E- ELT. The upper panel illustrates the results for a G-CLEF-like instrumental layout which provides a velocity span of 0.75 km s−1 pixel−1 and a spectral resolution of 100, 000. The lower panel depicts the results for a UVES-like spectrograph with velocity span of 1.2 km s−1 pixel−1, an image slicer and a spectral resolution of 110, 000. In these plots, we assume no red noise. To account for different red noise levels, the number of transits needs to be multiplied by the values provided in Figure 8. 17 s t i s n a r t f o r e b m u n s t i s n a r t f o r e b m u n 50 40 30 20 10 0 50 40 30 20 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 G-CLEF M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 SIMPLE M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 2 4 6 8 10 distance [pc] Fig. 7. -- Top panel: Number of transits re- quired to measure the 760 nm oxygen absorp- tion band with G-CLEF with 3σ confidence ver- sus distance of the planetary system from Earth. Bottom panel: Same as above, but for measure- ments of the 1268 nm oxygen absorption band with the SIMPLE-spectrograph employing a spec- tral resolving power of 100, 000. In these plots we assume no red noise. To account for different red noise levels, the number of transits needs to be multiplied by the values provided in Figure 8. 8 6 4 2 r o t c a f e m i t 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 contribution of red noise Fig. 8. -- The effect of red noise in the number of transits and the amount of time necessary to detect O2 in the atmosphere of an Earth twin at a 3σ confidence level. For example, a red noise level of 40% of the white noise level in the observed spectra approximately doubles the observing time required for a detection. ) s r a e y ( n a p s e m i t 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 M8, 760 nm M9, 760 nm M8, 1270 nm M9, 1270 nm 2 4 6 8 10 distance (pc) Fig. 9. -- Time span of the observations versus distance of the host star for observations of M8V and M9V stars in the O2 A-band at 760 nm and the O2 band at 1268 nm. The observations at 760 nm have a red noise level of 20%, while the obser- vations at 1268 nm have a red noise level of 50% of the white noise level. Unlike in the ideal case of no red noise, the observations in the O2 band at 1268 nm are more efficient than the observations on the O2 A-band only for M9V stars. These results are based on SIMPLE and a G-CLEF-like instrument mounted on the E-ELT. 18 s r a t s f o r e b m u n 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 - 10 pc 0 - 5 pc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 spectral sub-type of M-dwarf Fig. 10. -- Frequency of M-dwarfs in the solar neighbourhood (distances d ≤ 10 pc) as a function of spectral type. The most common sub-types are M3 and M4 dwarfs. For distances up to 5 pc, the most frequent sub-types are M3 and M5 dwarfs. Fig. 11. -- Histogram of the distribution of barycentric radial velocities for a sample of 176 M-dwarfs published by Chubak et al. (2012) in 5 km s−1 bins. . The bins of stars with veloci- ties less than 15 and 10 km s−1, respectively, are shown as dashed and square shaded areas in the histogram. Assuming the Chubak et al. (2012) sample is representative of all nearby M-dwarfs, about 44.3% of the stars will have absolute radial velocities smaller than 10 km s−1, and 56.8% will have radial velocities smaller than 15 km s−1. 19 l e b a l i a v a e m i t f o n o i t c a r f 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 Vbary = 30 km/s Vbary = 20 km/s Vbary = 10 km/s 5 10 15 20 25 30 vr [km/s] Fig. 12. -- Amount of time of optimum visibil- ity of an object in units of the yearly observ- ing time available at an ideal observing site as a function of the absolute value of the systemic radial velocity vr. We only consider the tar- get to be visible when following criteria are ful- filled: (a) air mass X ≤ 2, (b) Sun 15◦ below horizon, and (c) a relative radial velocity of ±(15 to 30) km s−1. We note that the vast majority of stars exhibit semi-amplitudes of the barycentric velocity of Vbary > 20 km s−1.
1711.10699	1	1711	2017-11-29T06:35:13	The Thermophysical Properties of the Bagnold Dunes, Mars: Ground-truthing Orbital Data	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	In this work, we compare the thermophysical properties and particle sizes derived from the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) rover's Ground Temperature Sensor (GTS) of the Bagnold dunes, specifically Namib dune, to those derived orbitally from Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS), ultimately linking these measurements to ground-truth particle sizes determined from Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) images. In general, we find that all three datasets report consistent particle sizes for the Bagnold dunes (~110-350 microns, and are within measurement and model uncertainties), indicating that particle sizes of homogeneous materials determined from orbit are reliable. Furthermore, we examine the effects of two physical characteristics that could influence the modeled thermal inertia and particle sizes, including: 1) fine-scale (cm-m scale) ripples, and 2) thin layering of indurated/armored materials. To first order, we find small scale ripples and thin (approximately centimeter scale) layers do not significantly affect the determination of bulk thermal inertia from orbital thermal data determined from a single nighttime temperature. Modeling of a layer of coarse or indurated material reveals that a thin layer (< ~5 mm; similar to what was observed by the Curiosity rover) would not significantly change the observed thermal properties of the surface and would be dominated by the properties of the underlying material. Thermal inertia and grain sizes of relatively homogeneous materials derived from nighttime orbital data should be considered as reliable, as long as there are not significant sub-pixel anisothermality effects (e.g. lateral mixing of multiple thermophysically distinct materials).	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The Thermophysical Properties of the Bagnold Dunes, Mars: Ground-truthing Orbital Data Christopher S. Edwards1, Sylvain Piqueux2, Victoria E. Hamilton3, Robin L. Fergason4, Ken E. Herkenhoff4, Ashwin R. Vasavada2, Kristen A. Bennett1, Leah Sacks5, Kevin Lewis6, Michael D. Smith7 1Northern Arizona University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, NAU BOX 6010 Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA, [email protected] 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA 3Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO, USA 4U.S. Geological Survey, Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ 5Carelton College, Northfield, MN, USA 6Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA 7NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA Key Points: 1) Thermally derived particle sizes of the Bagnold dunes from orbit and landed assets are consistent with direct grain size measurements 2) Thermally derived particle sizes are not dramatically affected by surface ripples or thin layers of induration/armoring 1 3) Sub-pixel mixing of sand with nearby materials likely resulted in overestimated particle sizes in previous orbital measurements Abstract: 244 words Body Text + Figures: 8026 Body References: 78 Figures: 11 Tables: 1 2 1 Abstract In this work, we compare the thermophysical properties and particle sizes derived from the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) rover's Ground Temperature Sensor (GTS) of the Bagnold dunes, specifically Namib dune, to those derived orbitally from Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS), ultimately linking these measurements to ground- truth particle sizes determined from Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) images. In general, we find that all three datasets report consistent particle sizes for the Bagnold dunes (~110- 350 µm, and are within measurement and model uncertainties), indicating that particle sizes of homogeneous materials determined from orbit are reliable. Furthermore, we examine the effects of two physical characteristics that could influence the modeled thermal inertia and particle sizes, including: 1) fine-scale (cm-m scale) ripples, and 2) thin layering of indurated/armored materials. To first order, we find small scale ripples and thin (approximately centimeter scale) layers do not significantly affect the determination of bulk thermal inertia from orbital thermal data determined from a single nighttime temperature. Modeling of a layer of coarse or indurated material reveals that a thin layer (< ~5 mm; similar to what was observed by the Curiosity rover) would not significantly change the observed thermal properties of the surface and would be dominated by the properties of the underlying material. Thermal inertia and grain sizes (e.g. lateral mixing of multiple thermophysically distinct materials). of relatively homogeneous materials derived from nighttime orbital data should be considered as reliable, as long as there are not significant sub-pixel anisothermality effects 3 2 Introduction The surface of Mars has been characterized using thermal infrared observations from orbit from the time of the Mariner and Viking orbiter missions (e.g. Neugebauer et al., 1971). Viking Infrared Thermal Mapper (IRTM) (Chase et al., 1978) observations (e.g. Christensen, 1982; Christensen, 1983, 1986; Kieffer et al., 1977; Kieffer et al., 1976) permitted the physical characterization of broad regions of the Martian surface to be constrained though little geologic context was available due to the large footprint of the IRTM instrument (~25km). When the Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES) (Christensen et al., 2001) instrument onboard the Mars Global Surveyor arrived, new views of the surface at much higher resolution (~3x6 km) permitted a host of additional thermophysical investigations, which linked observations to local/regional scale geologic processes (e.g. Bandfield & Edwards, 2008; Bandfield & Feldman, 2008; Mellon et al., 2000; Nowicki & Christensen, 2007; Putzig & Mellon, 2007b; Putzig et al., 2005). However, with the arrival of the Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) (Christensen et al., 2003) instrument onboard the 2001 Mars Odyssey orbiter and its 100 m/pixel thermal infrared data (Christensen et al., 2004), new investigations were made that linked outcrop-scale compositional information to material physical properties (e.g. Bandfield, 2008; Bandfield et al., 2013; Bandfield & Rogers, 2008; Christensen et al., 2003; Christensen et al., 2005; Edwards et al., 2009; Edwards et al., 2014; Edwards et al., 2008; Edwards & Ehlmann, 2015; Hamilton & Christensen, 2005; Osterloo et al., 2008; Rogers et al., 2009; Rogers & Bandfield, 2009; Rogers et al., 2005; Rogers & Fergason, 2011; Rogers & Nazarian, 2013; Tornabene et al., 2008). These new investigations robustly characterized the geologic 4 histories and origins of surfaces on Mars. The primary material property under consideration here is thermal inertia (TI), defined as TI = (krc)1/2, where k is the thermal conductivity, r is the bulk density of the material, and c is specific heat. TI is dominated by the bulk thermal conductivity on Mars (Jakosky, 1986; Kieffer et al., 1973; Presley & Christensen, 1997a, 1997b, 1997c) and can be related to an effective particle size for the upper several milli- to deci-meters of surface material (e.g. Piqueux & Christensen, 2011; Presley & Christensen, 1997b, 1997c; Presley & Craddock, 2006). The conversion from temperature to TI and ultimately to grain size has been applied to both orbital and landed spacecraft data (Fergason et al., 2006a; Kieffer et al., 1973). However, linking these effective derived particle sizes to in situ measurements (i.e., ground-truthing) by correlating derived thermophysical properties of surface materials with particle size distributions derived from imaging presents a significant challenge, due to disparate instrument resolutions as well as sampling cadence and times. This is especially true for those surfaces for which TI values which are not consistent with loose particulate material (<~350 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2; e.g. Piqueux & Christensen, 2009a, 2009b) or igneous bedrock (>1200 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2; e.g. Edwards et al., 2009). These intermediate thermal inertia regimes (e.g. ~350-1200 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2) can be further complicated by the non-homogeneity of the surfaces in question, which can introduce significant sub-pixel anisothermality into a single temperature measurement (e.g. Putzig & Mellon, 2007a, 2007b). Additionally, the limited temporal sampling of most fixed-local-time polar orbiting missions (e.g., those carrying TES and THEMIS) complicates the interpretation of thermophysical signatures. The temporally limited measurements obtained by these instruments do not capture the shape of the diurnal temperature response curve (e.g. 5 Fergason et al., 2006b), though a single nighttime temperature measurement can still provide a strong lever arm to disambiguate the physical properties of the surface. Importantly, over the lifetime of the Mars Odyssey mission the orbit migrated in local time sampling from ~0300-0700 and 1500-1900, which provided additional diurnal coverage over much of the martian surface. The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity rover spent approximately 20 sols (1222-1242) exploring and characterizing an active dune field in Gale Crater informally named the Bagnold Dunes. Specifically, the rover was parked at a barchan dune informally named "Namib" over these sols. The Bagnold dune field is located on the northwest flank of Aeolis Mons (Fig. 1a), informally known as "Mt. Sharp", and provides an excellent opportunity to link orbitally derived thermophysical properties to in situ observations, for several reasons: 1) the active nature of this dune field limits the likelihood of cementation of (and therefore vertical variation in) the particulate material; 2) aeolian dunes likely represent a relatively homogeneous material, reducing the potential for material mixture induced anisothermality of the surface within a given footprint; 3) the large areal extent of the dune field which is resolved by many THEMIS pixels (100m/px); and 4) these dunes have particle sizes large enough (>35µm) to be characterized by imaging instruments (e.g. ChemCam Remote Microscopic Imager (ChemCam RMI) (Maurice et al., 2012; Wiens et al., 2012), and Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) (Edgett et al., 2012)) onboard Curiosity. 6 In this work we link the orbital THEMIS thermophysical characteristics (and their interpretation in terms of particle sizes) with ground observations using the thermal infrared measurements of the Rover Environmental Monitoring Station (REMS) (Gómez- Elvira et al., 2012) – Ground Temperature Sensor (GTS) (Hamilton et al., 2014; Sebastian et al., 2010) to robustly determined particle sizes from Curiosity rover imagery. This inter- dataset linkage can be used to better understand dunes and other landforms across the surface of Mars and aid in interpretations of aeolian and geological processes. 3 Methods 3.1 THEMIS Observations THEMIS has been in operation around Mars onboard the 2001 Mars Odyssey spacecraft for ~15 years. Over this timeframe, it has imaged the majority of the planet multiple times, both day and night (Edwards et al., 2011b), and has acquired many observations of Gale Crater (Hamilton et al., 2014). THEMIS data were processed through standard techniques that include the removal of time-dependent focal plane temperature drift (Bandfield et al., 2004), temperature variations across the THEMIS calibration flag (Edwards et al., 2011b), map projection and then the removal of band-dependent and band- independent row- and column-correlated noise (Edwards et al., 2011b; Nowicki et al., 2013). These processing techniques result in noise-corrected, calibrated radiance data. THEMIS brightness temperatures were determined by matching the expected radiance from a uniformly emitting (blackbody) source to the THEMIS-measured radiance at band 9 (Bandfield et al., 2004; Christensen et al., 2004; Edwards et al., 2011b). The brightness temperature at band 9 (12.57µm) is taken to represent the surface temperature (Fergason et al., 2006b) because the Martian atmosphere is relatively transparent in that band and the 7 highest signal to noise measurements are obtained with this band, especially for nighttime data (Christensen et al., 2004; Edwards et al., 2009; Edwards et al., 2011b; Fergason et al., 2006b). When deriving thermophysical properties, nighttime data (typically ~3-6 AM for the Mars Odyssey orbit) are used as they minimize the effects of slopes and albedo, permitting a more reliable TI determination from a single data point. In deriving THEMIS thermal inertia values for this work (Figure 1B), the KRC thermal model (Kieffer, 2013) was employed. We used this model with a host of input parameters such as the albedo, atmospheric opacity, elevation (and corresponding surface pressure scaled based on the seasonal evolution observed by the Viking Landers), emissivity, surface geometry (i.e., slope and azimuth), temperature dependent material properties (specific heat and thermal conductivity) and modeled temperatures for a specified seasonal and local time range and interval for the region of interest on the surface (see Kieffer, 2013 for a comprehensive overview of the model capabilities). Previous work using the KRC thermal model with THEMIS data determined these input parameters on a framelet (256-line segment parts of the THEMIS image) basis (Fergason et al., 2006b) to facilitate the production of THEMIS thermal inertia as a global dataset. For this study we have developed a method to derive the thermal inertia using higher resolution input parameter datasets available at the MSL landing site on a pixel by pixel basis (Figure 2B). This is similar to several other investigations (e.g. Catling et al., 2006; Sefton-Nash et al., 2012), although those studies did not use the publicly available KRC thermal model. Furthermore, we use the "full" KRC model to develop a temperature to thermal inertia lookup table with 40 thermal inertia values ranging from 10-2200 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2, which runs for two martian years prior to outputting data in the third year to achieve seasonal stability. This is in contrast to previous 8 work that relied on the one-point mode which only runs a subset of seasonal cases (Fergason et al., 2006b; Kieffer, 2013). Critically, our updated method, while computationally inefficient, takes advantage of spatially registered data at the same scale as the THEMIS IR data. Data that was input into our model included a Context Camera (CTX) (Malin et al., 2007) Digital Terrain Model (DTM) used for the slope, azimuth, and elevation (Figure 3B-D) of the individual pixel as well as THEMIS visible Lambert albedo (V01494002; Edwards et al., 2011a) that is tied to TES Lambert albedo (Figure 3A). We assumed a surface emissivity of 0.98 (relevant for Gale Crater (Bandfield et al., 2000)) and we included latitude, longitude, and local time backplanes. The method described above was applied to THEMIS image I17950012. This image was converted to band 9 brightness temperature and resulted in 10s of millions of KRC model runs that generated temperature to thermal inertia lookup tables with 40 thermal inertia nodes on a pixel by pixel basis (~300K pixels). The look up table was then applied using linear interpolation to the THEMIS temperatures. THEMIS image I17950012 has a local time of 04:12, a solar longitude of 349.1, and a visible atmospheric dust opacity of 0.4 that was scaled to 6 mbar (Smith et al., 2016) and was acquired in Mars year 27. This image was chosen due to its ideal coverage of the site under investigation (e.g. the entire rover path present and future) as well as its overall calibration quality (no data dropouts, limited time between the shutter closing image and data acquisition, lack of saturated or undersaturated pixels, and no evidence of enhanced line-line noise) (Bandfield et al., 2004; Christensen et al., 2004; Edwards et al., 2011b). Following the conversion to thermal inertia, THEMIS data were transformed to particle size following the relationships established by (Presley & Christensen, 1997b, 9 1997c) and refined by (Piqueux & Christensen, 2011). This method uses a parameterization of the model results of Piqueux and Christensen (2011) and accounts for an input surface pressure (scaled for the elevation and season, ~800 Pa for Gale Crater), average upper layer skin depth temperature (180K), thermal conductivity derived from thermal inertia, porosity reasonable for particulate materials (40%; Denekamp & Tsur-Lavie, 1981), a solid density of 2950 kg/m3 (consistent with basalt), and specific heat for basalt (595.5 J kg-1 K-1; Fujii & Osako, 1973). We limit the scale of particle sizes to 1mm in Figure 2C because surfaces with effective particle sizes greater than this can no longer be interpreted as strictly particulate media (Piqueux & Christensen, 2009a, 2009b) and interpretations become non- unique. Effective particle sizes larger than 1 mm are consistent with cemented or indurated materials and without further context are non-unique. While further information can certainly be drawn from the larger effective particle sizes, the focus of this paper is the Bagnold sand dunes, and as such the need to consider coarser particle sizes was not warranted. 3.2 GTS Observations The GTS observations of interest span Sols 1222 through 1242 and were taken while the Curiosity rover was parked with the GTS sensor pointed at the west-facing, secondary slip face of Namib dune (Figure 4A). GTS data with the best calibration were selected and grouped by local time bins (Figure 4B) to match the output of the KRC thermal model used for analysis. Several measurement uncertainties exist when considering the GTS data, including potential shadowing by the MSL mast within the GTS observation footprint, and the influence of the radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG). The effects of these uncertainties are likely difficult to quantify but may 10 contribute to up to a ~4K temperature error (Hamilton et al., 2014; Martínez et al., 2014). A series of diurnal temperature curves were generated for a range of thermal inertia values (varying from 100-350 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 by 10 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 increments), albedo values (from 0.07-0.2 by 0.01 increments) with all the other appropriate inputs (e.g. REMS-derived UV opacities scaled to 6.1 mbar resulting in 0.337 (Smith et al., 2016), latitude, longitude, elevation, local time, assumed surface emissivity of 0.98, temperature dependent material properties, etc.) using the KRC thermal model, for comparison with measured temperatures from GTS data. Several metrics to assess the quality of the fit of the GTS temperature data to the KRC model-derived output over the 21 sols were computed including: 1) the RMS difference between the GTS and modeled data, 2) the difference between the minimum and maximum diurnal temperature (∆T) of GTS and modeled data, and 3) the difference of average diurnal temperatures between the GTS and modeled data. We take three approaches to determine the albedo and thermal inertia in order to compare methods. The first is a straightforward best fit by "eye", where the best fit is qualitatively estimated. Second, the minimum RMS difference is used to simultaneously solve for albedo and thermal inertia. And third, we use the minimum difference of average diurnal temperatures to solve for albedo and then, using the derived albedo, we find thermal inertia by using the minimum ∆T. The functional effect of the thermal inertia is to change the amplitude of the diurnal curve, while albedo, which controls the total amount of energy absorbed by the surface, results in a shift of the average temperature of the diurnal curve (Figure 6). Each of these thermal inertia values was then converted to particle size following the methods described above for THEMIS data. This thermally derived albedo (0.08-0.13, Figure 5) is compared to orbitally derived 11 Lambert albedo from THEMIS visible imagery (0.15 is typical for the Bagnold dunes) to ensure that a reasonable albedo is derived. Several modeling approaches were taken in order to assess the sensitivity of the derived thermal inertia to armoring/layering and variations in slope and azimuth in the GTS footprint (Figure 5B & C). There are two slope peaks in the GTS footprint at ~7.5 and ~28 and azimuths range from 225-300 (Figure 5D), which potentially indicate that a simple planar fit is not sufficient. The three approaches taken are as follows: 1) A best fit plane over the GTS footprint (Figures 4 & 5) is calculated and used as the slope and azimuth input to the thermal model. 2) Each scene within the GTS footprint was discretized into ~5,000 individual slope and azimuth combinations (facets) derived from Navcam stereo data. The resulting diurnal temperatures were modeled for each thermal inertia and albedo combination, using the additional inputs described above. The sampling of these facets was calculated by evenly filling the GTS FOV in angular space rather than in rectified spatial coordinates and intersecting these vectors with the Navcam surface mesh, selecting the slope and azimuth combination. This provides a reasonable approximation for the weighting of the near- and far-field contributions to the measured radiance. After modeling ~5,000 unique diurnal curves, representing the range of temperatures experienced by the surface for the given slope and azimuth distributions (Figure 5), these temperatures are converted into radiance, averaged, and converted back to a single brightness temperature per local time bin, and allowed us to capture the effect of slopes at sub-pixel scales. This process 12 results in set of diurnal curves as a function of thermal inertia and albedo that can then compared to the GTS data. While the resolution of the thermal inertia and albedo lookup table used is somewhat coarse – increments of 10 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 and 0.01 units of Lambert albedo – these incremental values result in temperature variations that are likely within the uncertainty of the GTS instrument (less than a few K). 3) Other scenarios were considered that match the fine-scale imagery of the dune scuffs by the rover wheel. These images indicate a slightly indurated, thin upper layer that has a lag of coarser particles. We model this scenario using a layered thermal model in which the upper material thermal inertia, lower material thermal inertia, and upper layer thickness can be varied independently. Due to the non-unique results of this method, the determination of the best fit was achieved by eye. We used a set of input variables (e.g. layer thicknesses etc.) that included those derived from the simple and facet models described above. The layered model is used in conjunction with image derived particle sizes converted to thermal inertia (185 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 and 150 µm for the lower material and 225 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 and 350 µm for the upper material) to simply assess the effects small scale armoring/induration of the upper most layers has on the thermophysical properties of dunes. 3.3 Particle sizes from Imagery MAHLI data spanning the campaign of the Bagnold dunes (Table 1) were used to determine the true particle sizes of the dune in question. Because each whole GTS 13 footprint was not analyzed with fine-scale rover imagery, given the relatively large GTS footprint (meters scale), a set of representative MAHLI images were chosen for analysis. These images cover the lee and stoss sides of a small-scale ripple. They also capture both disturbed and undisturbed materials that may reveal armoring of finer grained materials by a coarser grained surficial component (observed at MSL's "Rocknest" site and by other missions; e.g. MER (Fergason et al., 2006a)), or surface crusts formed by weakly cemented particulate materials (e.g. Piqueux & Christensen, 2009a, 2009b). Two methods were employed to derive the particle size from MAHLI data (Figures 7 & 8) which encompassed a range of standoff distances and thus resolutions: 1) Digital particle size analysis using a power spectral density function of particle sizes determined using Morlet wavelets (Buscombe, 2013). This method requires fully resolved particles and appropriate choice of input parameters including sampling density, the relationship between the image size (e.g. number of pixels) and the relative size of the particles (in pixels), which ensures that there are sufficient points to analyze and that there are sufficient octaves and notes to capture the size distribution of the particles, respectively (Buscombe, 2013). The result of this algorithm is a particle size distribution and the average particle size ± the standard deviation (Table 1; Figure 8). 2) For a subset of MAHLI images (Figure 7), point counts were conducted by hand. In this methodology, a grid of points was spaced evenly that resulted in at least 100 measurement points was overlain on the image. The long and short axes of the particle that lands under the given crosshair of a given grid 14 were measured and their average is reported as the particle's size. Crosshairs that did not align with a particle were excluded from the point count survey and crosshairs that align with an unresolvable particle are lumped into a category that is defined by the minimum resolvable particle of the image (3x the image resolution). The average and standard deviation of these particle sizes are then determined from this distribution (Table 1; Figure 7). 4 Results 4.1 Particle sizes from Orbit THEMIS data provide valuable medium resolution information about the effective particle sizes of surfaces across vast regions of Mars at scales relevant for local studies. These data leverage the thermophysical history and techniques of the Viking IRTM (e.g. Christensen, 1983; Edgett & Christensen, 1991; Kieffer et al., 1977) and TES (e.g. Jakosky et al., 2000; Mellon et al., 2000; Putzig & Mellon, 2007a; Putzig et al., 2005) instruments. The particle size of aeolian dunes are of particular interest for several reasons for this work. First, aeolian dunes provide the most uniform (from a particle size perspective) surfaces to compare to landed observations in both visible imagery and thermally (e.g. Fenton & Mellon, 2006; Fergason et al., 2006a; Fergason et al., 2006b) and have a predictable grain size constrained by wind tunnel experiments under Martian pressures (e.g. Greeley et al., 1980). Second, the Bagnold dunes represent the first time that an active dune, rather than a mantled or inactive bedform, can be directly assessed from orbit and ground. The Namib dune, in the southwest region of the main Bagnold dune field where Curiosity stopped does not fill an entire THEMIS pixel, which would also contain radiance from rock of the Murray and Stimson formations. This results in 15 mixing and anisothermality within a THEMIS pixel, ultimately reducing the utility of this area for direct comparison with THEMIS. However, the remainder of the Bagnold dune field, which fills many THEMIS pixels, is available for use and has similar characteristics to the Namib dune. There is no indication that Namib dune is meaningfully different than the remainder of the field from a particle size perspective and likely has a similar sediment source and transport history. It is worth mentioning that slightly stronger olivine-spectral features are observed in association with the barchan dunes, potentially suggesting minor differences in sorting may be present (Laporte et al., submitted; Viviano-Beck et al., 2014), though these minor spectral differences are difficult to quantity from a physical properties perspective. From analysis of THEMIS data (I17950012), the main Bagnold dune field (observed by multiple THEMIS pixels) has a minimum apparent thermal inertia of 200 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2, a maximum of 310 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 and an average thermal inertia of 240 ± 20 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2. This corresponds to a minimum particle size of 148 µm, a maximum of 968 µm and an average particle size of 251±84 µm. A single porosity for the entire image was used (40%) and is likely relevant for the regolith dominated surfaces (e.g. Denekamp & Tsur-Lavie, 1981; Piqueux & Christensen, 2011). The average particle size values were calculated after the conversion of each pixel from thermal inertia to particle size and not simply converting the average thermal inertia as the conversion is non-linear. These thermal inertia and particle size values were calculated using the maximum extent of the Bagnold dune field, while attempting to exclude areas subject to sub-pixel mixing of basement bedrock. This result from the average Bagnold dune field contrasts with our orbitally-derived particle sizes (using the same methods) of Namib dune which range 16 from 312 µm to 438 µm with an average of 396 ± 49 µm (Figure 2). The increased particle sizes at Namib dune and the maximum values of the main Bagnold dunes field likely represent the effect of subpixel mixing with the basement Murray and Stimson formations which commonly have thermal inertia values > ~350 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 translating to effective particle sizes of >1 mm. This type of mixing is observed at scales (e.g. Figure 1B) finer than the 100m/px THEMIS images and has a dramatic effect on the average derived particle sizes and thermal inertias. 4.2 Particle Sizes Derived from Landed Observations 4.2.1 GTS Derived Particle Sizes As described above, several different scenarios were considered to model the GTS data and derive particle sizes. The first being a simple model of a uniform thermal inertia using the geometry of a best fit plane, and a second, complex facet-based model incorporating small scale topography. The RMS best fit for both the plane and facet models resulted in a thermal inertia of 200 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2. The second fitting metric (minimum average and ∆T temperature differences) for the facet model resulted in a thermal inertia of 170 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2, while the plane model resulted in a thermal inertia of 180 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2. By eye, we estimated the thermal inertia to be 190 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2. This range of thermal inertias translate to particle sizes of ~106-216 µm and are functionally equivalent to particle sizes derived from orbit (within the measurement and model uncertainty). Neither the plane or facet models matched the time of peak temperature recorded by the GTS (~30-45-minute mismatch); however, the facet model typically did a better job at matching the time of peak temperature, with only a ~15-minute discrepancy. 17 The albedo used in these models was not derived from another dataset, as is common practice from orbit which reduces the number of free parameters, but was instead permitted to vary. This additional free parameter resulted in a significant range of best fit albedos (0.07-0.13), all of which are below the orbitally derived value of ~0.15±0.01 for the main Bagnold dune field. 4.2.2 Particle sizes from Imagery Particle sizes determined from MAHLI imaging are treated as ground-truth, especially those determined manually. There are significant target-to-target variations in the derived particle sizes determined manually, for example the target Barby is significantly coarser (~320-350 µm) than Otavi or the Gobabeb scoop sites (~150-200 µm). This is likely due to the sampling location with Barby, which was undisturbed near the ripple crest of the stoss side of High Dune (nearby to Namib, Figure 1B), while the other samples, including the Goabeb Scoop Site 2 discard (sieved) and Otavi were acquired from the lee side of Namib dune proper. The grain size differences between the lee and stoss sides of ripples/dunes are expected based on terrestrial experience and as such likely samples a range of grain sizes expected of the active Bagnold dunes. The values determined for the Gobabeb Scoop Site 2 discard and Otavi are most useful for direct comparison to GTS derived particle sizes as the GTS footprint observed the area near to the primary sampling region of Curiosity for the Bagnold dunes campaign (Figure 9). The particle size values determined automatically via the wavelet method have significantly larger standard deviations than those measured manually, often more than ±100 µm, which limits their utility to discriminate materials with approximately the same 18 particle sizes, in this case fine to medium sands. If these data were used solely without manual point counts to verify the derived particle sizes in the cases measured here, the automated method would likely overestimate the actual particle size (Table 1; Figure 8). 5 Discussion 5.1 Cross Dataset Comparisons To first order, all the datasets examined in this work agree with one another, and for the first time provide a quantitative linkage from measured particle sizes to orbital data of an active dune field on Mars. Fine scale imagery resulted in particle sizes of ~150-350 µm (depending on the sampling location), the GTS data resulted in values ranging from ~110 to 220 µm (considering the range of fitting and modeling methods) and the orbital THEMIS data resulted in particle sizes of ~160 to 340 (from the average and 1-s values). However, there are important discrepancies. A much larger range of thermal inertia values was determined from orbit for both the main dune field and Namib dune, likely representing sub-pixel mixing of the higher thermal inertia basement Murray mudstone and Stimson sandstone (Vasavada et al., 2017). This would artificially raise the upper end of derived thermal inertia values which is not adequately captured in the modeling from orbit, and thus bulk thermal inertia interpretations can represent a significant problem for the fine-scale interpretation of future landing sites, as well as geologic contexts. A large range in visible imagery-derived particle sizes was also observed (Figure 8 & Table 1) that likely represents some amount of variability expected to be present over much of the dune field. This variability did not seemingly have a large effect on the derived thermal inertia values, which is discussed further in the next section. 19 The ~30 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 differences in the GTS derived thermal inertia values, depending on the type of fit conducted, are likely within or close to the uncertainty of both the instrument and model (i.e., input parameters), and is also commonly expected from orbit. However, the derivation of both thermal inertia and albedo from a single diurnal curve can also provide non-unique results when considering measurement uncertainties. While the average daily temperature is primarily controlled by the albedo (Figure 6B), thermal inertia plays a secondary role (Figure 6A). The opposite is true for the diurnal temperature range, where thermal inertia is the primary controlling factor, but albedo plays a secondary role. As such the two variables are not completely independent and cannot be perfectly separated given measurement uncertainties when solving for both using a thermal model. The comparison of a thermally derived albedo to an independent albedo determination from additional instrumentation acquired contemporaneously is critical to reducing the free model parameters and providing better model fits to complicated datasets. 5.2 Using Ground-truth to Interpret Orbital Data GTS provides a critical link between ground-truth particle sizes and the globally available, orbitally derived THEMIS thermal inertia covering ~100% of the Martian surface at 100m/px from 60S to 60N. As is observed in other regions of Gale Crater (Vasavada et al., 2017), the complex geological surfaces examined by GTS often result in non-unique interpretations. Thermal inertia can be even more difficult to constrain from orbit, with limited context, fewer constraints (typically full diurnal coverage is not available), and larger footprints covering 104 m2 at best with current instrumentation (e.g. THEMIS, TES, etc.). While sand dunes are likely the most thermophysically 20 straightforward features available on the surface of Mars, they still present significant complications. Figures 4A and 5 illustrate the complex surfaces observed in Navcam imagery where ripples are present at cm- to m-scales. Ripples such as these are observed elsewhere on the dune field (e.g. Lapotre et al., 2016) and they complicate the distribution of surface slopes and azimuths. Furthermore, as discussed earlier, the variability in particle size across different sections (e.g., lee, stoss, trough, peak, etc.) of the dune further complicates interpretations. However, the GTS scale footprint permits the assessment of the effects of uncertainties on the thermal data, and thus, due to the scale of the dunes observed here, permits a translation of the GTS findings to orbit for use with interpreting THEMIS and TES data. We found that the inclusion of small scale ripples (adding a slope and slope azimuth distribution) in the thermal modeling of surfaces did not result in significantly better fits to the measured surface temperatures (Figures 4 & 11). Some important differences are apparent in Figure 11, namely related to the timing and fit of the post- dawn data, which are better modeled when adding the distribution of sub-pixel slopes and slope-azimuth facets. This has important implications for orbitally derived thermal inertias (typically derived pre-dawn) where no differences are observed between simple planar and facet model for fine-scale slopes of the magnitude observed at Namib dune. This result indicates (and is borne out by our measurements) that the thermal inertia of the dune derived from orbit is likely to be representative of the actual dune particle size and does not require the consideration of fine (10s of cm scale) ripple features likely to be prevalent on the surface of dunes. 21 The second consideration is the potential for armoring and/or induration of the upper ~mm to ~cm of Martian dunes. This also does not likely represent a significant impediment to orbitally derived thermal inertia values, especially for active Martian dunes where relatively thin and only moderately coarser particle size armors have been observed (e.g. Fergason et al., 2006a). While we were able to achieve slightly better fits (e.g. better match the shape of the curve, and not just the nighttime or min/max temperatures) by using a more complicated layered model, the effects, at least in the case of Namib dune, are also very minor. By using the two measured particle sizes from Barby (the armoring coarser layer, ~350µm) and Gobabeb (~150µm) as endmembers in this layered model and varying the thickness of the layer (assuming an albedo of 0.11), we find that layers ~a few mm (up to ~5 mm) thick behave almost identically to the underlying material (Figure 10). A moderately coarse armor (such as that modeled here) that is less than ~1 mm causes a maximum deviation of ~2K at local noon, which is within typical instrument uncertainties reported for THEMIS (Christensen et al., 2004) and GTS (Gómez-Elvira et al., 2012; Sebastian et al., 2010; Vasavada et al., 2017). These coarser or indurated upper layers are more efficient at translating the heat to the insulating base layer, which then controls the overall surface temperature (Figure 10). A surface that has an armoring layer that is thicker than ~30 mm would be dominated by the material properties of the upper layer and behave nearly the same a non-layered surface composed of the same materials. However, armoring layers as thick as this have not been observed on any bedforms by landed spacecraft, therefore these results suggest that the thermal inertia derived from thermal observations likely represent the bulk, underlying material and not the typically thin armoring material. These results are consistent with 22 observations of Saber bedform at the MER Spirit landing site, which was composed of a finer-grained material covered by a coarser-grained armor. The modeling of Mini-TES data found that a thin layer of coarser particles (e.g. 1-2 mm) did not significantly affect the derived thermal inertial of aeolian bedforms. Similarly to the work presented here, the surface temperature of the bedform was controlled primarily by the grain size of the substrate and not the armoring lag (Fergason et al., 2006a). The fits of these significantly more complicated models (both planar and faceted) do not affect pre-dawn temperatures significantly (~1-2K) from a simple planar model, though they do in general fit the rise and late afternoon/evening data better than a simple model (Figure 11). Similarly, this has important considerations for the determination of particle sizes from orbit as the derived thermal inertia, even with some armoring/induration (up to ~5 mm for the particle sizes modeled here), is likely representative of the bulk particle size of the dune and wind regime, rather than the thermal inertia of the lag, which is again borne out by the THEMIS observations shown here. 5.3 Dunes and Sands on Mars Thermophysical data from THEMIS and other instruments has enabled the determination of the approximate bulk particle size of materials that comprise dunes on Mars (Christensen, 1983; Edgett & Christensen, 1991; Fenton & Mellon, 2006; Fergason et al., 2012; Fergason et al., 2006b). This has improved our understanding of the range of materials mobile on Mars both now and in the recent past. It is instructive to compare the particle size observed at Bagnold with those of other dunes observed globally, both from orbital and surficial measurements, to understand how representative the Bagnold dune field is to other regions on Mars. This comparison can then inform how the results 23 presented here can be applied more broadly to interpret the recent geologic and aeolian history of not only Gale crater, but of the Martian surface. Edgett and Christensen (1991) determined the average Martian dune particle size of km-scale dune fields (Kaiser, Proctor, Rabe, and Moreux craters) using Viking Infrared Thermal Mapper (IRTM) and Viking Orbiter images. These dunes have thermal inertia values (converted to SI units using a scale factor of 41.86 from Viking-era units of 10-3 cal cm-2 K-1 s-1/2, and particle sizes updated from thermal inertia values following the same methods from orbit used in this work and assuming a 6 mbar atmosphere) ranging from 326 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2 to 356 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2, with an average thermal inertia of 343 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2. These thermal inertia values correspond to particle sizes greater than ~1000 µm (coarse sand to very coarse sand) with our updated thermal inertia to particle size conversion controlled by lab experiments and numerical models (e.g. Piqueux & Christensen, 2009a, 2009b; Presley & Christensen, 1997b, 1997c) as compared to previous conversion estimates of ~500µm (Edgett & Christensen, 1991). Edgett and Christensen (1994) expanded the work of Edgett and Christensen (1991) by examining IRTM thermal inertia data for dark crater floor units found in latitudes ±55°, correlating thermal inertia values with surface morphology, and interpreting the sedimentary and aeolian transport history of the materials. The average thermal inertia for dark intra-crater features was 270 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2, and thermal inertia values ranged from 160 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2 to 440 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2. Fenton et al. (2003) derived particle size values from TES-derived thermal inertia values for the Proctor crater dune. The average TES-derived thermal inertia value is 277 ± 17 J m-2 K-1s-1/2, corresponding to an effective particle size of 600 ± 140 µm. Fenton and Mellon (2006) also calculated particle size values from TES-derived 24 thermal inertia values for the Proctor crater dune field. TES thermal inertia values range between 260 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2 and 360 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2, corresponding to particles sizes ranging between ~450 µm and >1 mm (medium to coarse sand). These estimations of dune particle sizes are all comparable when considering the high uncertainties associated with these calculations (Fergason et al., 2006b). The thermal inertia and particle sizes of bedforms was also determined at both the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) landing sites using Mini-TES data (Fergason et al., 2006a). In many cases, Microscopic Imager (MI) data were also acquired of these features, enabling the direct comparison of particle sizes derived from thermal inertia and imagery in a manner similar to our work at Namib dune. At Meridiani Planum in the bottom of Endurance crater, Mini-TES footprints from the Opportunity rover did not fall cleanly on the stoss or lee side of the bedforms, and therefore all Mini-TES measurements were averaged to determine the thermal inertia of the entire bedform. The bedform at Endurance crater has a thermal inertia of 200 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2, which corresponds to a particle size of ~150 µm (fine sand). The sand at this location was deemed too hazardous to image directly with MI, therefore a different patch of sand closer to the rover was instead imaged. Given the proximity, it was assumed that this sand was likely similar to the bedform material observed by Mini-TES, as such making a direct comparison between MI and Mini-TES reasonable. The particle size of the sand was measured by hand in this location and was ~130 µm in diameter, similar to the values that were thermally derived from Mini-TES (Fergason et al., 2006a) and likely within the measurement/model error. 25 At the Gusev site, Mini-TES on the Spirit rover observed a bedform in Bonneville crater that consisted of two distinct sections, which were each modeled separately. The upper section was observed to climb the crater wall to the north and had a Pancam (Bell et al., 2008) albedo of ~0.18. The second portion of the observed bedform was located on the lower crater floor and had a Pancam albedo of ~0.23. The thermal inertia derived from Mini-TES for the north crater wall bedform was 200 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2, corresponding to a particle size of ~150 µm (fine sand) (Fergason et al., 2006a). The bedform near the crater floor has a Mini-TES-derived thermal inertia of 160 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2, corresponding to finer particle size of~60 µm (silt) (Fergason et al., 2006a). Rather than being composed of different sands, Fergason et al. (2006a) suggested that the variable thermal inertia between these two units may instead be caused by a thin layer (≤1 cm) of mantling aeolian dust. This hypothesis is consistent with both the higher albedo and lower thermal inertia values observed. Fergason et al. (2006a) further suggested that the darker particles of the bedform section along the wall were consistent with enhanced bedform activity and as such a less dusty surface. In our above work, we suggested that armoring and/or induration of the upper ~cm of Martian dunes is not a significant factor in the derivation of thermal inertia. The distinction with the observations of the bedforms in Endurance crater is that they were mantled in dust, rather than a coarse-grained armor. The finer-grained dust, given its smaller diurnal skin depth, has a much larger effect on the derived thermal inertia (both from ground and orbital measurements) than a coarser- grained armor, with a larger diurnal skin depth. The thermal inertia derived for bedforms observed at the MER and MSL sites (i.e., Bonneville and Endurance craters at MER and Bagnold dune field at MSL) are all 26 lower than thermal inertia values derived for intracrater bedforms from orbital IRTM-, and TES-derived thermal inertia and particle size values (e.g. Aben, 2003; Edgett & Blumberg, 1994; Edgett & Christensen, 1991; Fenton et al., 2003). However, the thermal inertia values derived at Bonneville and Endurance craters (~200 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2) are the same as the thermal inertias derived at the Bagnold dunes. The Bagnold dunes are likely to be more active given their low albedos as compared to the Bonneville and Endurance crater bedforms, where optically thick, but thermally thin dust may be present (e.g. Fergason et al., 2006a). Given the modeling findings above and previous results we conclude (e.g. Fergason et al., 2006a)it is likely that the Bonneville and Endurance dunes share a similar bulk particle size as the Bagnold dunes as thin and patchy dust doesn't dramatically affect the thermal inertia of these surfaces, and may have been transported under similar regimes. The large particle sizes determined in early orbital studies (e.g. coarse to very coarse sands) are likely the direct function of the large measurement spot sizes used (km- scale), rather than related to the bedforms themselves. As shown in this work, the small- scale (cm- to m) features of bedforms do not dramatically affect the effective particle sizes (Figure 4b & c), and rather it is the sub-pixel mixing with the substrate (significantly enhanced as pixel sizes grows) that dominates the uncertainty in particle size. While there is likely some variability among dune particle sizes on Mars, early studies that rely on TES results almost certainly overestimate the particle size for all but the largest dune fields. 27 6 Conclusions The Bagnold dune field offers a unique opportunity to directly compare ground- truth particles sizes derived from imagery and lander-scale thermophysical data to orbital data at high enough spatial scales to resolve many Martian dune fields at geologically relevant scales. The cross-comparison of particle size from the significantly different methods presented in this work yield consistent results. This work shows that particle size determination of homogeneous materials, despite the small-scale (i.e., cm- to m-scale) features and thin armoring/induration of the upper surface (i.e., <1 cm), do not dramatically affect the thermal inertia derivation and thus effective particle size determination. Instead, we find that sub-pixel mixing of the substrate (e.g. bedrock) dominates the particle size uncertainty, which can be reduced by acquiring data at finer spatial scales. This effect likely drove the early interpretation of relatively coarse dune particle sizes on Mars (coarse to very coarse sands) due to the reliance and availability of km-scale TES and IRTM data. We propose that dune particle sizes on Mars are likely more similar to those observed in the Bagnold dunes (fine-medium sands), rather than those derive from early orbital studies. 28 7 Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the MSL team who operates the Curiosity rover on Mars, as well as the REMS instrument team, that developed the Ground Temperature Sensor. The authors thank Daniel Buscombe for assistance with the pyDGS software package. Data used in this work was obtained from the NASA Planetary Data System. Additional reduced data products are available from Christopher Edwards ([email protected]), NAU's Open Knowledge website (http://openknowledge.nau.edu/id/eprint/5230), modeling and data analysis tools are freely available (http://krc.mars.asu.edu and http://davinci.asu.edu). This research was funded by the MSL Participating Scientist program and the 2001 Mars Odyssey THEMIS instrument. Part of this work was performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA. 29 8 Figure Legends Figure 1. (A) Context Image mosaic with the rover traverse overlain, (B) HiRISE color mosaic of the Bagnold dunes area. The orange star corresponds to the location where activities associated with Namib dune from Sol 1222-1242 were undertaken. 30 Figure 2. (A) CTX basemap of lower Mount Sharp, including a portion of the rover traverse path, the outline of the Bagnold dunes corresponding to our grain size results, and an arrow that identifies Namib dune. (B) THEMIS thermal inertia derived from I17950012 of lower Mt. Sharp colorized and overlain on the CTX basemap. (C) THEMIS derived particle size from I17950012 of lower Mt. Sharp colorized and overlain on the CTX basemap. Particle sizes >1mm are not distinguishable and are colorized as white. 31 Figure 3. (A) THEMIS derived visible Lambert albedo scaled to 100m/px (Edwards et al., 2011a), (B) CTX derived elevation scaled to 100m/px, (C) CTX derived slopes scaled to 100m/px, and (D) CTX derived slope azimuth scaled to 100m/px used in the derivation of the thermal inertia (Figure 2B) and ultimately particle size (Figure 2C). 32 Figure 4. (A) Navcam mosaic of Namib Dune. The approximate GTS footprint is highlighted in orange (B) GTS data acquired over sols 1222-1242 along with several different model fits. (C) Difference of modeled and measured RMS temperatures for a range of albedo and thermal inertias. The locations of the model fits in (B) are shown. 33 Figure 5. Navcam derived (A) topography, (B) slopes, (C) slope azimuth of Namib Dune. The approximate GTS footprint is highlighted in by the white outline. (D) A normalized histogram showing the distribution of slopes and azimuths under the GTS footprint. A best fit plane to the GTS footprint results in a slope of 17.7 and azimuth of 269.8. 34 Figure 6. Effects of (A) thermal inertia and (B) albedo over the ranges used in the model fits. While the average diurnal temperature (dots) primarily depends on the albedo of the surface, thermal inertia contributes as a second order effect complicating the method of using average temperature to derive a "thermal" albedo. 35 Figure 7. MAHLI images at a variety of standoffs taken over the campaign at Namib dune. 36 Figure 8. Bar graph of the average particle sizes determined from both by the Digital Particle size analysis methods of Buscombe (2013)(dark gray) and by manual point counts (light gray). Averages are shown with 1 sigma standard deviations. Manual point counts have ~100-300 measurement location each. 37 Figure 9. Sampling location at Namib dune shown in the front left hazard camera. Highlighted locations correspond to areas where MAHLI images in Table 1 and Figure 7 were acquired. 38 Figure 10. Thin layers of coarse or cemented material (225 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2, derived from MAHLI particle sizes of Gobabeb) are modeled on top of a thermally thick layer of lower thermal inertia (185 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2, derived from MAHLI particle sizes of Barby). Layers of coarser material up to ~a few mm behave identically to the thermally thick subsurface materials. Layers up to ~20mm are likely to be indistinguishable in GTS and orbital data as the difference from a lower thermal inertia surface would be less than a few K. Layers greater than a few cm (~30 mm) thick are dominated by the material properties of the upper layer and behave nearly the same a non-layered surface composed of the same materials. Surfaces with these characteristics would be indistinguishable within instrument temperature uncertainties typical for GTS and THEMIS. Full diurnal curves are shown in (A), while the difference from the 185 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2 material are shown in (B). 39 Figure 11. The best fit ∆T plane (180 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2; 0.13 albedo) and facet model (170 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2; 0.12 albedo) data are compared to a layered plane and facet model with a 1 cm layer of 350 µm particles with an albedo of 0.12 on top of a 150 µm particle size substrate. Full diurnal curves are shown in (A), while the difference between a simple planar model and the other scenarios are shown in (B). In general, the most complicated model (faceted and layered) provides the best fit of the data, matching the early morning data, post-sunrise trends and the evening (~7 pm) data. No model used in this work is able to accurately model either the peak temperature timing or the mid- afternoon temperature drop, indicating there are some additional physical properties not being adequately addressed. 40 Table 1. 41 9 References Aben, L. K. (2003). Compositional and thermophysical analysis of Martian aeolian dunes, M.S. thesis. Ariz. State Univ., Tempe, Dec., 117 pp. Bandfield, J. L. (2008). High-silica deposits of an aqueous origin in western Hellas Basin, Mars. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(12). doi:doi:10.1029/2008GL033807 Bandfield, J. L., & Edwards, C. S. (2008). Derivation of martian surface slope characteristics from directional thermal infrared radiometry. Icarus, 193(1), 139- 157. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.08.028 Bandfield, J. L., Edwards, C. S., Montgomery, D. R., & Brand, B. D. (2013). The dual nature of the martian crust: Young lavas and old clastic materials. Icarus, 222(1), 188-199. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.10.023 Bandfield, J. L., & Feldman, W. C. (2008). Martian high latitude permafrost depth and surface cover thermal inertia distributions. J. Geophys. Res, 113, E08001. doi:doi:10.1029/2007JE003007 Bandfield, J. L., Hamilton, V. E., & Christensen, P. R. (2000). A global view of Martian volcanic compositions. Science, 287(5458), 1626-1630. doi:doi: 10.1126/science.287.5458.1626 Bandfield, J. L., & Rogers, A. D. (2008). Olivine dissolution by acidic fluids in Argyre Planitia, Mars: Evidence for a widespread process? Geology, 36(7), 579-582. doi:doi: 10.1130/G24724A.1 Bandfield, J. L., Rogers, A. D., Smith, M. D., & P.R.Christensen. (2004). Atmospheric correction and surface spectral unit mapping using Thermal Emission Imaging System data. J. Geophys. Res., 109, E10008. doi:doi: 10.1029/2004JE002289 Bell, J. F., Rice, M. S., Johnson, J. R., & Hare, T. M. (2008). Surface albedo observations at Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum, Mars. J. Geophys. Res., 113(E6). doi:doi: 10.1029/2007je002976 Buscombe, D. (2013). Transferable wavelet method for grain-size distribution from Catling, D. C., Wood, S. E., Leovy, C., Montgomery, D. R., Greenberg, H. M., Glein, C. images of sediment surfaces and thin sections, and other natural granular patterns. Sedimentology, 60(7), 1709-1732. doi:doi: 10.1111/sed.12049 Mars. Icarus, 181(1), 26-51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2005.10.020 R., & Moore, J. M. (2006). Light-toned layered deposits in Juventae Chasma, Chase, S. C., Jr., Engel, J. L., Eyerly, H. W., Kieffer, H. H., Palluconi, F. D., & Schofield, D. (1978). Viking infrared thermal mapper. Appl. Opt., 17(8), 1243- 1251. Christensen, P. R. (1982). Martian dust mantling and surface composition: Interpretation of thermophysical properties. J. Geophys. Res., 87(B12), 9985-9998. doi: doi: 10.1029/JB087iB12p09985 Christensen, P. R. (1983). Eolian intracrater deposits on Mars: Physical properties and global distribution. Icarus, 56(3), 496-518. doi:doi: 10.1016/0019- 1035(83)90169-0 Christensen, P. R. (1986). The Spatial Distribution of Rocks on Mars. Icarus, 68(2), 217- 238. doi:doi:10.1016/0019-1035(86)90020-5 Christensen, P. R., Bandfield, J. L., Bell, J. F., III, Gorelick, N., Hamilton, V. E., Ivanov, A., . . . Wyatt, W. (2003). Morphology and composition of the surface of Mars: 42 Mars Odyssey THEMIS results. Science, 300(2056), 2056-2061. doi:doi: 10.1126/science.1080885 Christensen, P. R., Bandfield, J. L., Hamilton, V. E., Ruff, S. W., Kieffer, H. H., Titus, T., . . . Greenfield, M. (2001). Mars Global Surveyor Thermal Emission Spectrometer experiment: description and surface science results. J. Geophys. Res., 106(E10), 23,823-823,871. doi:doi:10.1029/2000JE001370 Christensen, P. R., Jakosky, B. M., Kieffer, H. H., Malin, M. C., McSween, H. Y., Jr., Nealson, K., . . . Ravine, M. (2004). The Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) for the Mars 2001 Odyssey Mission. Space Science Reviews, 110(1), 85-130. doi:doi: 10.1023/B:SPAC.0000021008.16305.94 Christensen, P. R., McSween, H. Y., Bandfield, J. L., Ruff, S. W., Rogers, A. D., Hamilton, V. E., . . . Moersch, J. E. (2005). Evidence for magmatic evolution and diversity on Mars from infrared observations. Nature, 436(7050), 504-509. doi:doi: 10.1038/nature03639 Denekamp, S., & Tsur-Lavie, Y. (1981). Measurement of porosity in natural sand deposits. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 107(ASCE 16173). Edgett, K., Yingst, R. A., Ravine, M., Caplinger, M., Maki, J., Ghaemi, F. T., . . . Goetz, W. (2012). Curiosity's Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) Investigation. Space Science Reviews, 170(1-4), 259-317. doi:doi: 10.1007/s11214-012-9910-4 Edgett, K. S., & Blumberg, D. G. (1994). Star and linear dunes on Mars. Icarus, 112, 448-464. Edgett, K. S., & Christensen, P. R. (1991). The Particle-Size of Martian Aeolian Dunes. Journal of Geophysical Research-Planets, 96(E5), 22765-22776. doi:doi: 10.1029/91je02412 Edgett, K. S., & Christensen, P. R. (1994). Mars aeolian sand: Regional variations among dark-hued crater floor features. J. Geophys. Res., 99(E1), 1997-2018. Edwards, C. S., Bandfield, J. L., Christensen, P. R., & Fergason, R. L. (2009). Global distribution of bedrock exposures on Mars using THEMIS high-resolution thermal inertia. J. Geophys. Res, 114, E11001. doi:doi: 10.1029/2009JE003363 Edwards, C. S., Bandfield, J. L., Christensen, P. R., & Rogers, A. D. (2014). The formation of infilled craters on Mars: Evidence for widespread impact induced decompression of the early martian mantle? Icarus, 228(0), 149-166. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.10.005 Edwards, C. S., Christensen, P. R., & Hamilton, V. E. (2008). Evidence for extensive olivine-rich basalt bedrock outcrops in Ganges and Eos chasmas, Mars. Journal of Geophysical Research-Planets, 113(E11), E11003. doi:doi: 10.1029/2008je003091 Edwards, C. S., Christensen, P. R., & Hill, J. (2011a). Mosaicking of global planetary image datasets: 2. Modeling of wind streak thicknesses observed in Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) daytime and nighttime infrared data. J. Geophys. Res., 116(E10), E10005. doi:doi: 10.1029/2011JE003857 Edwards, C. S., & Ehlmann, B. L. (2015). Carbon sequestration on Mars. Geology, 43(10), 863-866. doi:doi: 10.1130/g36983.1 Edwards, C. S., Nowicki, K. J., Christensen, P. R., Hill, J., Gorelick, N., & Murray, K. (2011b). Mosaicking of global planetary image datasets: 1. Techniques and data 43 processing for Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) multi-spectral data. J. Geophys. Res., 116(E10), E10008. doi: doi: 10.1029/2010JE003755 Fenton, L. K., Bandfield, J. L., & Ward, A. (2003). Aeolian processes in Proctor Crater on Mars: Sedimentary history as analyzed from multiple data sets. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 108(E12). Fenton, L. K., & Mellon, M. T. (2006). Thermal properties of sand from Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES) and Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS): Spatial variations within the Proctor Crater dune field on Mars. J. Geophys. Res., 111, E06014. doi:doi:10.1029/2004JE002363 Fergason, R., Christensen, P., Golombek, M., & Parker, T. (2012). Surface properties of the Mars Science Laboratory candidate landing sites: characterization from orbit and predictions. Space Science Reviews, 1-35. doi:doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9891- 3 Fergason, R. L., Christensen, P. R., Bell III, J. F., Golombek, M. P., Herkenhoff, K. E., & Kieffer, H. H. (2006a). Physical properties of the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites as inferred from Mini-TES-derived thermal inertia. J. Geophys. Res., 111, E02S02. doi: doi:10.1029/2005JE002583 Fergason, R. L., Christensen, P. R., & Kieffer, H. H. (2006b). High resolution thermal inertia derived from THEMIS: Thermal model and applications. J. Geophys. Res., 111, E12004. doi:doi: 10.1029/2006JE002735 Fujii, N., & Osako, M. (1973). Thermal diffusivity of lunar rocks under atmospheric and vacuum conditions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 18(1), 65-71. Gómez-Elvira, J., Armiens, C., Castañer, L., Domínguez, M., Genzer, M., Gómez, F., . . . Martín-Torres, J. (2012). REMS: The Environmental Sensor Suite for the Mars Science Laboratory Rover. Space Science Reviews, 170(1-4), 583-640. doi:doi: 10.1007/s11214-012-9921-1 Greeley, R., Leach, R., White, B., Iversen, J., & Pollack, J. (1980). Threshold windspeeds for sand on Mars: Wind tunnel simulations. Geophysical Research Letters, 7(2), 121-124. doi:doI: 10.1029/GL007i002p00121 Hamilton, V. E., & Christensen, P. R. (2005). Evidence for extensive olivine-rich bedrock in Nili Fossae, Mars. Geology, 33(6), 433-436. doi:doi: 10.1130/G21258.1 Hamilton, V. E., Vasavada, A. R., Sebastian, E., Juarez, M. D., Ramos, M., Armiens, C., . . . Zorzano, M. P. (2014). Observations and preliminary science results from the first 100 sols of MSL Rover Environmental Monitoring Station ground temperature sensor measurements at Gale Crater. Journal of Geophysical Research-Planets, 119(4), 745-770. doi:doi: 10.1002/2013je004520 Jakosky, B. M. (1986). On the thermal properties of martian fines. Icarus, 66(1), 117- 124. doi:doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(1086)90011-90014 Jakosky, B. M., Mellon, M. T., Kieffer, H. H., Christensen, P. R., Varnes, E. S., & Lee, S. W. (2000). The thermal inertia of Mars from the Mars Global Surveyor Thermal Emission Spectrometer. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 9643-9652. Kieffer, H. H. (2013). Thermal model for analysis of Mars infrared mapping. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 118(3), 451-470. doi:doi: 10.1029/2012je004164 Kieffer, H. H., Martin, T. Z., Peterfreund, A. R., Jakosky, B. M., Miner, E. D., & Palluconi, F. D. (1977). Thermal and albedo mapping of Mars during the Viking 44 primary mission. J. Geophys. Res., 82, 4249-4291. doi:doi: 10.1029/JS082i028p04249 Kieffer, H. H., S.C. Chase, J., Miner, E., Munch, G., & Neugebauer, G. (1973). Preliminary report on infrared radiometric measurements from Mariner 9 spacecraft. J. Geophys. Res., 78, 4291-4312. doi:doi: 10.1029/JB078i020p04291 Kieffer, H. H., S.C. Chase, J., Miner, E. D., Palluconi, F. D., Munch, G., Neugebauer, G., & Martin, T. Z. (1976). Infrared thermal mapping of the martian surface and atmosphere: First results. Science, 193, 780-786. Laporte, M. G. A., Ehlmann, B. L., Minson, S. E., Arvidson, R. E., Ayoub, F., Fraeman, A. A., . . . Bridges, N. T. (submitted). Compositional Variationsin Sands of the Bagnold Dunes at Gale Crater, Mars, from Visible-Shortwave Infrared Spectroscopy and Comparisoin to Ground-Truth from the Curiosity Rover. Journal of Geophysical Research-Planets, Bagnold Dunes Speical Issue. Lapotre, M. G. A., Ewing, R. C., Lamb, M. P., Fischer, W. W., Grotzinger, J. P., Rubin, D. M., . . . Yingst, R. A. (2016). Large wind ripples on Mars: A record of atmospheric evolution. Science, 353(6294), 55-58. doi:doi: 10.1126/science.aaf3206 Malin, M. C., Bell, J. F., Cantor, B. A., Caplinger, M. A., Calvin, W. M., Clancy, R. T., . . . Wolff, M. J. (2007). Context Camera Investigation on board the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. J. Geophys. Res., 112, E05S04. doi:doi: 10.1029/2006JE002808. Martínez, G. M., Rennó, N., Fischer, E., Borlina, C. S., Hallet, B., de la Torre Juárez, M., . . . Haberle, R. M. (2014). Surface energy budget and thermal inertia at Gale Crater: Calculations from ground-based measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 119(8), 1822-1838. doi:doi: 10.1002/2014je004618 Maurice, S., Wiens, R. C., Saccoccio, M., Barraclough, B., Gasnault, O., Forni, O., . . . Vaniman, D. (2012). The ChemCam Instrument Suite on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover: Science Objectives and Mast Unit Description. Space Science Reviews, 170(1-4), 95-166. doi:doi: 10.1007/S11214-012-9912-2 Mellon, M. T., Jakosky, B. M., Kieffer, H. H., & Christensen, P. R. (2000). High resolution thermal inertia mapping from the Mars Global Surveyor Thermal Emission Spectrometer. Icarus, 148(2), 437-455. doi:doi:10.1006/icar.2000.6503 Neugebauer, G., Munch, G., Kieffer, H., S.C. Chase, J., & Miner, E. (1971). Mariner 1969 infrared radiometer results: Temperatures and thermal properties of the martian surface. Astron. J., 76, 719-728. Nowicki, K., Edwards, C., & Christensen, P. (2013). Post-Projection Removeal of Row- and Column-Correlated Noise in Line-Scanning Data: Application to THEMIS Infrared Data. IEEE Transaactions - WHISPERS. Nowicki, S. A., & Christensen, P. R. (2007). Rock abundance on Mars from the Thermal Emission Spectrometer. J. Geophys. Res, 112, E05007. doi:doi:10.1029/2006JE002798 Osterloo, M. M., Hamilton, V. E., Bandfield, J. L., Glotch, T. D., Baldridge, A. M., Christensen, P. R., . . . Anderson, F. S. (2008). Chloride-Bearing Materials in the Southern Highlands of Mars. Science, 319(5870), 1651-1654. doi:doi: 10.1126/science.1150690 45 Piqueux, S., & Christensen, P. R. (2009a). A model of thermal conductivity for planetary soils: 1. Theory for unconsolidated soils. J. Geophys. Res., 114, E09005. doi:doi:10.1029/2008JE003308 Piqueux, S., & Christensen, P. R. (2009b). A model of thermal conductivity for planetary soils: 2. Theory for cemented soils. J. Geophys. Res., 114(E09006). doi:doi:10.1029/2008JE003309 Piqueux, S., & Christensen, P. R. (2011). Temperature-dependent thermal inertia of homogeneous Martian regolith. J. Geophys. Res., 116, E07004. doi:doi: 10.1029/2011JE003805 Presley, M. A., & Christensen, P. R. (1997a). The effect of bulk density, particle shape, and sorting on the thermal conductivity of particulate materials under martian atmosphere pressures. J. Geophys. Res., 102(E4), 9221-9229. doi:doi: 10.1029/97JE00271 Presley, M. A., & Christensen, P. R. (1997b). Thermal conductivity measurements of particulate materials, Part I: A review. J. Geophys. Res., 102(E3), 6535-6549. doi:doi: 10.1029/96JE03302 Presley, M. A., & Christensen, P. R. (1997c). Thermal conductivity measurements of particulate materials, Part II: Results. J. Geophys. Res., 102(E3), 6551-6566. doi:doi: 10.1029/96JE03303 Presley, M. A., & Craddock, R. A. (2006). Thermal conductivity measurements of particulate materials: 3. Natural samples and mixtures of particle sizes. J. Geophys. Res, 111, E09013. doi:doi: 10.1029/2006JE002706 Putzig, N. E., & Mellon, M. T. (2007a). Apparent thermal inertia and the surface heterogeneity of Mars. Icarus, 191(1), 68-94. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.05.013 Putzig, N. E., & Mellon, M. T. (2007b). Thermal behavior of horizontally mixed surfaces on Mars. Icarus, 191(1), 52-67. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.03.022 Putzig, N. E., Mellon, M. T., Kretkea, K. A., & Arvidson, R. E. (2005). Global thermal inertia and surface properties of Mars from the MGS mapping mission. Icarus, 173(2), 325-341. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.08.017 Rogers, A. D., Aharonson, O., & Bandfield, J. L. (2009). Geologic context of bedrock exposures in Mare Serpentis, Mars: Implications for crust and regolith evolution in the cratered highlands. Icarus, 200(2), 446-462. doi:doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.11.026 Rogers, A. D., & Bandfield, J. L. (2009). Mineralogical characterization of Mars Science Laboratory candidate landing sites from THEMIS and TES data. Icarus, 203(2), 437-453. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.04.020 Rogers, A. D., Christensen, P. R., & Bandfield, J. L. (2005). Compositional heterogeneity of the ancient martian crust: Analysis of Ares Vallis bedrock the THEMIS and TES data. J. Geophys. Res., 110, E05010. doi:doi:10.1029/2005JE002399 Rogers, A. D., & Fergason, R. L. (2011). Regional-scale stratigraphy of surface units in Tyrrhena and Iapygia Terrae, Mars: Insights into highland crustal evolution and alteration history. J. Geophys. Res., 116, E08005. doi:doi:10.1029/2010JE003772 Rogers, A. D., & Nazarian, A. H. (2013). Evidence for Noachian flood volcanism in Noachis Terra, Mars, and the possible role of Hellas impact basin tectonics. 46 Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 118(5), 1094-1113. doi:doi: 10.1002/jgre.20083 Sebastian, E., Armiens, C., Gomez-Elvira, J., Zorzano, M. P., Martinez-Frias, J., Esteban, B., & Ramos, M. (2010). The Rover Environmental Monitoring Station Ground Temperature Sensor: a pyrometer for measuring ground temperature on Mars. Sensors (Basel), 10(10), 9211-9231. doi:doi: 10.3390/s101009211 Sefton-Nash, E., Catling, D. C., Wood, S. E., Grindrod, P. M., & Teanby, N. A. (2012). Topographic, spectral and thermal inertia analysis of interior layered deposits in Iani Chaos, Mars. Icarus, 221(1), 20-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2012.06.036 Smith, M. D., Zorzano, M.-P., Lemmon, M., Martín-Torres, J., & de Cal, T. M. (2016). Aerosol optical depth as observed by the Mars Science Laboratory REMS UV photodiodes. Icarus, 280, 234-248. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.07.012 Tornabene, L. L., Moersch, J. E., McSween, H. Y., Hamilton, V. E., Piatek, J. L., & Christensen, P. R. (2008). Surface and crater-exposed lithologic units of the Isidis Basin as mapped by coanalysis of THEMIS and TES derived data products. J. Geophys. Res., 113, E10001. doi: doi:10.1029/2007JE002988 Vasavada, A. R., Piqueux, S., Lewis, K. W., Lemmon, M. T., & Smith, M. D. (2017). Thermophysical properties along Curiosity's traverse in Gale crater, Mars, derived from the REMS ground temperature sensor. Icarus, 284, 372-386. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.11.035 Viviano-Beck, C. E., Seelos, F. P., Murchie, S. L., Kahn, E. G., Seelos, K. D., Taylor, H. W., . . . Morgan, M. F. (2014). Revised CRISM spectral parameters and summary products based on the currently detected mineral diversity on Mars. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 119(6), 1403-1431. doi:10.1002/2014JE004627 Wiens, R. C., Maurice, S., Barraclough, B., Saccoccio, M., Barkley, W. C., Bell, J. F., . . . Wong-Swanson, B. (2012). The ChemCam Instrument Suite on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover: Body Unit and Combined System Tests. Space Science Reviews, 170(1-4), 167-227. doi:doi: 10.1007/S11214-012-9902-4 47
1612.06947	1	1612	2016-12-21T02:23:02	Photometric observations of the mutual phenomena of the Galilean satellites at the Pulkovo observatory in 2014-2015	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present the results of photometric observations of the mutual phenomena in the system of Galilean satellites obtained during 2014-2015. The observations were performed using the 26-inch refractor, Normal Astrograph, ZA-320 telescope of the Pulkovo Observatory (084) and MTM-500 telescope at Pulkovo mountain station at Kislovodsk (C20). We made observations a total of 72 phenomena. We had derived 51 light curves of good and medium quality for 34 events. The RMS of determining the brightness is within a range from 0.02 to 0.19 mag, the average RMS is 0.06 mag. This work was supported by RFBR grant (project 15-02-03025).	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Photometric observations of the mutual phenomena of the Galilean satellites at the Pulkovo observatory in 2014-2015 M.Yu. Khovritchev1∗, I.S. Izmailov1, E.A.Roshchina1, D.L.Gorshanov1, A.M. Kulikova1 1Pulkovo Observatory, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pulkovskoe sh. 65, St. Petersburg, 196140 Russia February 20, 2018 Abstract We present the results of photometric observations of the mu- tual phenomena in the system of Galilean satellites obtained during 2014-2015. The observations were performed using the 26-inch refrac- tor, Normal Astrograph, ZA-320 telescope of the Pulkovo Observa- tory (084) and MTM-500 telescope at Pulkovo mountain station at Kislovodsk (C20). We made observations a total of 72 phenomena. We had derived 51 light curves of good and medium quality for 34 events. The RMS of determining the brightness is within a range from 0.02 to 0.19 mag, the average RMS is 0.06 mag. This work was supported by RFBR grant (project 15-02-03025). Introduction Dynamical studies of the Galilean satellites require the series of accurate po- sitional observations. An analysis of the light curves of satellites obtained during the mutual phenomena allows us to get high-precise astrometric data ∗e-mail: [email protected] 1 Table 1: Telescopes, cameras and observers. Telescope Camera Observers Site and code Pulkovo 084 Pulkovo 084 Pulkovo 084 26-inch refractor, D=650 mm, F=10413 mm Normal Astrograph, D=330 mm, F=3500 mm ZA-320, D=320 mm, F=3200 mm FLIProline 9000, FOV 12′ × 12′, scale=0.24′′/pix SBIG STL-11K, × 23′, FOV 35′ scale=0.53′′/pix STL- SBIG 16803, FOV 39′ × 39′, scale=0.6′′/pix Number of light curves 27 Izmailov I.S. Khovrichev M.Yu., Kulikova A.M. Gorshanov D.L., Petrova S.N., Slesarenko V.Yu., K.N., Naumov Ivanov A.V., Sokov E.N., Kupriyanov V.V. Lyashenko A.Yu., Rusov S.A. 8 9 7 Mountain Station (Kislovodsk) C20 MTM-500M, D=500 mm, F=6520 mm STL- SBIG 1001E, FOV 21′ × 21′, scale=1.2′′/pix - differences of topocentric (in the case of mutual occultations) or heliocen- tric (for mutual eclipses) coordinates of two satellites involved in the phe- nomenon. Mutual phenomena in the system of Galilean satellites of Jupiter are repeated with a period of six years and nine months. The aim of this work is providing observational data for further analysis. Pulkovo Observatory was taking part in the previous international campaigns of mutual phenomena ob- servations in 1995, 1997, 2003 and 2009 (Emel'yanov et al (2011)). Pulkovo Observatory had collect about of ten percents of all world observations dur- ing the campaign of 2003 (Arlot et al (2009)). Recent set of phenomena was available for observations at Pulkovo (084) and at Mountain station near Kislovodsk (C20) from October 2014 to August 2015. Jupiter's altitude reached to 45 degrees in the meridian. Ephemeris of mutual phenomena were provided by Celestial Mechanics Department of SAI MSU and presented at the ephemeris server MULTI-SAT (Emel'yanov and Arlot (2008)). 2 Figure 1: Typical light curves of several phenomena. 3 1 Observations and data processing Observations were carried out with three Pulkovo telescopes (26-inch re- fractor, Normal Astrograph, astrograph ZA-320) and the MTM-500M tele- scope of the Pulkovo Mountain Station near Kislovodsk (See Table 1). The observations were performed according to the recommendations given in Emel'yanov's paper (Emel'yanov (2008)). Observations began in advance before the start of phenomenon and continued for up to the duration time after it's end. The exposure time was varied from 0.1 s to 1 s, depending on weather conditions and the magnitudes of satellites. No filter was used. These CCD images were analyzed and integrated fluxes were calculated for satellite images at the central moment of each frame. Dark current and flat fields were taken into account by the standard way. As a result, we obtained the ratio of satellite light flux and reference object or the difference between magnitudes of the satellite and the reference object. We chose the satellite, which did not involved in a phenomenon, or a background star as a refer- ence object. To correct the background gradient due to planet's scattered light we calculated the background intensities using a linear model accord- ing to expression I(x, y) = Ax + By + C. The parameters A, B and C were determined by the least squares method using intensity value of the pixels (I(x, y)) within the ring-shaped area around the image of the satel- lite. Whenever possible, the Jupiter was taken out of the field of view of the camera to minimize errors in determining the background. The least radius of aperture was selected. 2 The results and conclusions In a total, we performed 73 observations of 37 mutual phenomena. Fifty- series of CCD frames of suitable quality and light curves were obtained. Some examples of light curves are shown in Fig. 1. The values of magnitude differ- ences were approximated by a quadratic polynomials to estimate preliminary values of photometric precision. The standard deviations of determining the magnitudes are ranged from 0.02 to 0.19 mag. The obtained light curves are available at the Pulkovo database http://puldb.ru/photometry/phemu2014-2015/. Acknowledgments This work was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 15-02-03025). 4 References Emel'yanov, N. V. Special program of observations of Jovian and Saturnian satellites for 2009. Solar System Research, 42, 5, 448 (2008). Emel'yanov N. V., Arlot J.-E. The natural satellites ephemerides facility MULTI-SAT. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 487, 759 (2008). Arlot J.-E., Thuillot W., Ruatti C. et al, The PHEMU03 catalogue of ob- servations of the mutual phenomena of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 493, 3, 1171 (2009). Emelyanov N. V., Andreev M. V., Berezhnoi A. A. et al Astrometric results of observations at Russian observatories of mutual occultations and eclipses of Jupiter's Galilean satellites in 2009. Sol. Sys. Research, 45,3, 264 (2011). 5
1903.01206	1	1903	2019-03-04T12:28:25	Flattened loose particles from numerical simulations compared to Rosetta collected particles	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Cometary dust particles are remnants of the primordial accretion of refractory material that occurred during the initial stages of the Solar System formation. Understanding their physical structure can help constrain their accretion process. We have developed a simple numerical simulation of aggregate impact flattening to interpret the properties of particles collected by COSIMA. The aspect ratios of flattened particles from both simulations and observations are compared to differentiate between initial families of aggregates characterized by different fractal dimensions $D_f$. This dimension can differentiate between certain growth modes. The diversity of aspect ratios measured by COSIMA is consistent with either two families of aggregates with different initial $D_f$ (a family of compact aggregates with fractal dimensions close to 2.5-3 and some fluffier aggregates with fractal dimensions around 2). Alternatively, the distribution of morphologies seen by COSIMA could originate from a single type of aggregation process, such as DLPA, but to explain the range of aspect ratios observed by COSIMA a large range of dust particle cohesive strength is necessary. Furthermore, variations in cohesive strength and velocity may play a role in the higher aspect ratio range detected (>0.3). Our work allows us to explain the particle morphologies observed by COSIMA and those generated by laboratory experiments in a consistent framework. Taking into account all observations from the three dust instruments on-board Rosetta, we favor an interpretation of our simulations based on two different families of dust particles with significantly distinct fractal dimensions ejected from the cometary nucleus.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. Lasue_agg_Rosetta_rev2_final March 5, 2019 c(cid:13)ESO 2019 Flattened loose particles from numerical simulations compared to Rosetta collected particles J. Lasue1, I. Maroger1, R. Botet2, Ph. Garnier1, S. Merouane3, Th. Mannel4, 5, A.C. Levasseur-Regourd6, and M.S. Bentley7 9 1 0 2 r a M 4 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 6 0 2 1 0 . 3 0 9 1 : v i X r a 1 IRAP, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, CNES, UPS, Toulouse, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 Université Paris-Saclay/Université Paris-Sud/CNRS, UMR 8502, LPS, Orsay, France 3 Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Göttingen, Germany 4 Space Research Institute of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria 5 University of Graz, Graz, Austria 6 Sorbonne Université, CNRS, LATMOS, Paris, France 7 European Space Astronomy Centre, Madrid, Spain Received September 15, 1996; accepted March 16, 1997 ABSTRACT Context. Cometary dust particles are remnants of the primordial accretion of refractory material that occurred during the initial stages of the Solar System formation. Understanding their physical structure can help constrain their accretion process. Aims. The in situ study of dust particles collected at slow speeds by instruments on-board the Rosetta space mission, including GIADA, MIDAS and COSIMA, can be used to infer the physical properties, size distribution, and typologies of the dust. Methods. We have developed a simple numerical simulation of aggregate impact flattening to interpret the properties of particles collected by COSIMA. The aspect ratios of flattened particles from both simulations and observations are compared to differentiate between initial families of aggregates characterized by different fractal dimensions D f . This dimension can differentiate between certain growth modes, namely the Diffusion Limited Cluster-cluster Aggregates (DLCA, D f ≈ 1.8), Diffusion Limited Particle-cluster Aggregates (DLPA, D f ≈ 2.5), Reaction Limited Cluster-cluster Aggregates (RLCA, D f ≈ 2.1), and Reaction Limited Particle-cluster Aggregates (RLPA, D f ≈ 3.0). Results. The diversity of aspect ratios measured by COSIMA is consistent with either two families of aggregates with different initial D f (a family of compact aggregates with fractal dimensions close to 2.5-3 and some fluffier aggregates with fractal dimensions around 2). Alternatively, the distribution of morphologies seen by COSIMA could originate from a single type of aggregation process, such as DLPA, but to explain the range of aspect ratios observed by COSIMA a large range of dust particle cohesive strength is necessary. Furthermore, variations in cohesive strength and velocity may play a role in the higher aspect ratio range detected (>0.3). Conclusions. Our work allows us to explain the particle morphologies observed by COSIMA and those generated by laboratory experiments in a consistent framework. Taking into account all observations from the three dust instruments on-board Rosetta, we favor an interpretation of our simulations based on two different families of dust particles with significantly distinct fractal dimensions ejected from the cometary nucleus. Key words. comets: general -- comets: individual: 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko -- protoplanetary disks -- accretion: accretion disk -- methods: numerical -- space vehicles: instruments 1. Introduction 1.1. Cometary dust particles Comets are believed to preserve pristine dust grains and to pro- vide information about their aggregation processes in the early Solar System (e.g. Weidenschilling 1997; Blum 2000). Analyses of data from the Giotto mission to comet 1P/Halley and of foil impacts and aerogel tracks retrieved by the Stardust mission in the coma of comet 81P/Wild 2 have indeed given clues to the presence of low density dust particles built up of agglomerates, possibly with different tensile strengths and porosities (e.g. Fulle et al. 2000; Hörz et al. 2006; Burchell et al. 2008). The interpre- tation of remote polarimetric observations of bright comets, such as 1P/Halley and C/1995 O1 Hale-Bopp, has lead to similar con- clusions (Levasseur-Regourd et al. 2008; Lasue et al. 2009). Ag- gregation of solid particles in the early Solar System may there- fore form a diversity of porosities represented by their fractal dimension, D f (Dominik & Tielens 1997; Kempf et al. 1999; Bertini et al. 2009). Understanding the structure of cometary dust particles can give clues to these early Solar System processes (Blum & Wurm 2008; Fulle & Blum 2017). its long rendezvous with 1.2. The Rosetta mission comet During 26 month 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (hereafter 67P) in its 2015 apparition, the Rosetta spacecraft monitored the properties of cometary dust particles released by the nucleus in the pre- and post- perihelion phases, as well as during some outburst events. Three instruments were specifically devoted to the study of dust particles: i) COSIMA (the COmetary Secondary Ion Mass Analyzer, Kissel et al. (2007)) collected dust particles of 10 to 100 µm size on 1 cm2 targets, imaged them with a microscope operating under grazing incidence illumination Article number, page 1 of 9 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Lasue_agg_Rosetta_rev2_final with a resolution of about 14 µm, and then analyzed them through a mass spectrometer after indium ion beam ablation, ii) MIDAS (the Micro-Imaging Dust Analysis System, Riedler et al. (2007)) collected micron-sized dust particles on targets of about 3.5 mm2, in order to obtain 3D images of their surfaces down to tens of nanometers pixel resolution using atomic force microscopy, and iii) GIADA (the Grain Impact Analyzer and Dust Accumulator, Colangeli et al. (2007)) measured the optical cross-section, speed, momentum and cumulative flux of hundreds of sub-millimeter sized dust particles. The COSIMA and MIDAS instruments collected dust par- ticles at velocities in the 1 to 15 m s−1 range (Fulle et al. 2015), that is to say at relative velocities much lower than the 6.1 km s−1 reached during the collection of 81P/Wild 2 samples. Their chemical properties were thus mostly preserved, as well as part of their physical structure. Some small particles, which could be fragments of fragile individual particles, were nevertheless noticed (e.g. Bentley et al. 2016; Merouane et al. 2016). Inter- estingly enough, some particles appeared to be flattened, most likely as a result of impact alteration (e.g. Langevin et al. 2016; Mannel et al. 2016). The Rosetta dust experiments provide complementary in- sights into the properties of dust particles thanks to their dif- ferent approaches (see, for a review, Levasseur-Regourd et al. 2018). As far as images are concerned, the total number of dust particles detected is above 30,000 for COSIMA and above 1,000 for MIDAS (Levasseur-Regourd et al. 2018; Güttler et al. sub- mitted). More specifically, all images of dust particles indicate that they consist of more or less porous agglomerates of smaller grains (following the classification introduced in (Güttler et al. submitted)). Their overall sizes, identified by well-defined boundaries, range from about 1 micrometer to tens of microm- eters for MIDAS, and from tens of micrometers to several hun- dreds of micrometers for COSIMA. The presence of aggregated structures at distinct scales suggests a hierarchical aggregation (Bentley et al. 2016). Indeed, the fractal dimension of a very porous agglomerate detected by MIDAS was determined via a density-correlation function (Mannel et al. 2016), to be equal to 1.7±0.1. Dust showers observed by GIADA were also explained by the presence of fragile agglomerates with a fractal dimension below 2, possibly disrupted through electrostatic fragmentation induced by the spacecraft (Fulle et al. 2015, 2016). Consider- ing fractal aggregation processes, the porosity of dust particles in 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko can thus be estimated to be at least equal to 90% for very porous ones, and about 75% for more compact ones (e.g. Blum & Wurm 2008; Bertini et al. 2009). The porosity of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko's dust particles has been estimated to be around 60% based on the density of the nucleus and the composition measured by COSIMA (Fulle et al. 2017). Analysis of the reflectance of porous dust particles collected by COSIMA indicate that a high porosity (>50%) is necessary to explain that the mean free path of photons in the particle correspond to a significant fraction of the particle size (Langevin et al. 2017). Finally, it may be added that the properties of cometary dust particles, as revealed by the Rosetta mission, are, as previously suspected, remarkably comparable to CP-IDPs, i.e. Chondritic Porous Interplanetary Dust Particles collected in the Earth's stratosphere, and UCAMMs, i.e. UltraCarbonaceous Antarctica MicroMeteorites collected in the snows of central regions of Antarctica (e.g. Levasseur-Regourd et al. 2018). The morphology, the structure and the composition of such dust particles strongly suggest that, as well as cometary nuclei Article number, page 2 of 9 Fig. 1. Diversity of crushed particle types detected by COSIMA (Nick: compact particle, C; Alexandros: rubble pile, R; Estelle: shattered clus- ter, S; and Johannes: glued cluster, G) (adapted from Langevin et al. (2016)). themselves, they formed in the solar nebula and the primordial disk (e.g. Davidsson et al. 2016; Blum et al. 2017), and were never processed within large objects. 1.3. Specificity of COSIMA results COSIMA collected and analyzed cometary particles ejected by 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on gold black covered targets (Kissel et al. 2007). The dust particles ejected by the comet im- pacted COSIMA targets at a speed <10 m s−1 according to GI- ADA measurements (Rotundi et al. 2015) with a deceleration <1 × 106 m s−2 according to Hornung et al. (2016). These val- ues are enough to damage the initial structure of the dust parti- cles during the collision, as visually assessed from the images acquired by COSISCOPE after collection. With a resolution of 14 microns, the microscope enabled studies of particle typology and flux (Langevin et al. 2016). The images show particles rang- ing from a few tens to several hundreds of microns, the majority of which appears to be built of micron-sized sub-components, as confirmed by MIDAS (Bentley et al. 2016). Analysis of the par- ticle morphologies identified four families of particles (Langevin et al. 2016) which fall into two major classes, compact and clus- tered. These families are : 1. Compact (type C) particles present well-defined bound- aries without smaller satellite particles and with an apparent height above the collecting plane of the same order of mag- nitude as their horizontal (x and y) dimensions. 2. Shattered cluster (type S) particles are defined by clusters of fragments for which no individual fragment makes up a ma- jor fraction of the initial particle. These particles are inter- preted as rearrangement of fragments within the impacting particle without associated disruption. 3. Glued cluster (type G) particles have a well-defined shape and a complex structure where sub-components appear to be linked by a fine-grained matrix with a smooth texture. 4. Rubble piles (type R) particles comprise components much smaller than their apparent size. Upon collision with the J. Lasue et al.: Flattened loose particles compared to Rosetta Fig. 2. Probability density of aspect ratio for each type of particles de- tected by COSIMA (adapted from Langevin et al. (2016)). plate, the sub-components rearranged themselves in a flat- tened conical pile with many satellite components indicating poor cohesion. √ The different types of particles collected by COSIMA are illus- trated in Fig. 1. The grazing incidence illumination provided by COSIS- COPE allows both the surface area of the collected particles and their height (based on their projected shadow) to be determined (see Fig. 1). The area is determined from the ratio of bright pixels before and after exposure to the dust flux from the comet. An as- pect ratio of the compacted particles can be obtained from height area. The aspect ratio density distribution for each detected particle type is shown in Fig. 2. The compact particles, C, appear unbro- ken and present the largest aspect ratios, with a first peak around 0.5 and another close to 1. The other particles present typical aspect ratios of around 0.3 with the shattered clusters being the flattest type of agglomerates. To understand the physical struc- ture of cometary nuclei, it is important to infer, as far as possible, properties of dust particles prior to their collection. COSIMA analyses have shown a correlation between the flux of dust par- ticles at various distances from the comet nucleus and their mor- phology (Merouane et al. 2016). The fragmenting particles ap- pear to have a mechanical strength of a few 1000 Pa (Hornung et al. 2016) and their morphological diversity could result from different collection speeds in the range from 1 m s−1 to 6 m s−1 as investigated by laboratory simulations (Ellerbroek et al. 2017). In this work, we investigate if different dust particle struc- tures prior to their collection can also lead to the different mor- phologies found by the Rosetta dust instruments. We present a set of numerical simulations of fractal aggregates flattening on impact with a plane surface, before presenting its results and discussing their implications for the interpretation of the Rosetta measurements. 2. Method 2.1. Fractal aggregates models We expect the dust particles aggregating in the solar nebula to present fractal structures. Fractal aggregates in the early Solar System form a diversity of porosities that can be represented by their fractal dimension, D f , based on their aggregation pro- cesses (Wurm & Blum 1998). Aggregation simulations consider Fig. 3. 3D representation of four aggregates representing the four differ- ent aggregation processes considered in this work. DLCA (D f ≈ 1.8), RLCA (D f ≈ 2.1), DLPA (D f ≈ 2.5) and RLPA (D f ≈ 3). A scale is given in number of monomers, and a referential frame is indicated by colored arrows (x=blue, y=red, z=green). the collisions of spherical monomers which represent individual grains aggregating to form dust particles (Güttler et al. submit- ted). Four main aggregation processes, leading to significantly different fractal dimensions, are considered: DLCA (D f ≈ 1.8), RLCA (D f ≈ 2.1), DLPA (D f ≈ 2.5) and RLPA (D f ≈ 3). The DL models are Diffusion Limited models, in which when one monomer meets another one it sticks directly to it. The RL mod- els are Reaction Limited models, in which molecular reactions occur when two monomers encounter each other and result in them sliding with respect to one another in order to maximize the number of bonds, resulting in a more compact aggregate. CA stands for Cluster-cluster Aggregation and PA for Particle- cluster Aggregation : in PA particles, monomers are added to the same main cluster which accretes all the mass and is rela- tively compact, whereas in CA particles, monomers form sep- arate clusters which then aggregate, thus resulting in a smaller fractal dimension of the aggregate. The PA process occurs when the number of monomers compared to the available volume is high, increasing the chances of collision amongst small aggre- gates. Depending on the physical conditions of the primordial pro- tosolar nebula, in terms of dust to gas ratio and dust compo- sition, we can expect each of these kinds of aggregates to be formed (Weidenschilling 1997; Kimura 2001). They have also each been produced by computer simulations and laboratory experiments simulating the initial stages of planetary accretion (Meakin 1991; Blum & Wurm 2008). 2.2. Flattening simulation In a first step, 3D off-lattice aggregates of a number N=10 000 identical spherical particles (called monomers) are generated ac- cording to the 4 different aggregation processes described above. The resulting fractal aggregates are characterized by different Article number, page 3 of 9 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Lasue_agg_Rosetta_rev2_final tions between the two spherical elements. EVdW = AHr 12d ≤ Ek = 2 3 πr3ρ(sin θ)2V2 (sin θ0)2 = AH 8πr2ρdV2 (2) (3) where EVdW is the van der Waals energy, AH is the Hamaker constant for the material considered, r is the radius of a sin- gle monomer, d is the diameter of a monomer, Ek is the kinetic energy of the monomer, ρ is the density of the monomer, θ is the angle between the direction linking the two centers of the monomers and the vertical direction, as illustrated in Fig. 4 and V is the velocity of the aggregate with respect to the collecting surface z = 0.9 The monomer diameter, d, is slightly larger (by 0.4 nm) than the steady state distance between the centers of two touching monomers. Typical monomer diameters are considered to be 20 nm or larger, making this difference negligible (< 2%). We thus consider the distance between two touching monomer centers to be equal to d. The Hamaker constant of two particles interacting corresponds to a measure of the relative strength of the particles material with respect to the attractive van der Waals forces between them (Hamaker 1937). We call θ0 the angle θ for which Eq (2) is an equality. sin θ0 is a threshold above which monomers may break their bonds and bounce. Changing this parameter can either be viewed as changing the cohesive strength between monomers or as chang- ing the collection velocity, as Eq (3) shows. Thus, with the Hamaker constant of dry minerals under vacuum conditions AH ≈1 × 10−19 J (Israelachvili 2011): -- sin θ0 ≈ 1 corresponds to very cohesive monomer bonds, low collection speed or very small monomer size (value typically obtained for V = 1 m s−1 and r =0.01 µm or for AH values higher than 1 × 10−19 J) -- sin θ0 ≈ 10−3 corresponds to all bonds being broken, rel- atively higher collection speed, or larger monomer sizes (value typically obtained for V =10 m s−1 and r =0.1 µm) So, if a projected monomer meets another monomer, we can ). If ν ≤ 1, the monomer compute a collision parameter (ν = sin θ sin θ0 sticks to the one it bumps into. If ν > 1 , the incoming monomer bounces according to a random direction based on the Lamber- tian reflection rule (see Fig. 4) and sticks to the plane z = 0 or previously stuck monomers if they are present. To make the model more realistic with respect to potential mass loss that may be incurred by the aggregates as they are flat- tened and their bonds are broken, in further simulations a mass loss probability Ploss is introduced. In this case, if a monomer meets the condition ν > 1, then it will be removed from the simulation with the mass loss probability Ploss which matches the chance that some monomers do not stick to any others and bounce back to free space during the collision. An illustration of the effect of changing the value for sin(θ0) is given in Fig. 5 where the morphology of flattened aggre- gates is clearly dependent upon the initial structure of the ag- gregates and the geometric parameters. Under conditions where most bonds are broken (sin θ0 ≈ 10−3), the more compact aggre- gates appear to generate a small pyramid of monomers with an angle of repose. The more porous the aggregates, the flatter ap- pears to be the projection. In the case where bonds are unbroken (sin θ0 ≈ 1), similar structures appear, but some vertical chain- like columns of monomers extending upwards are also present Fig. 4. Representation of the collision geometry for 2 superposed monomers. If θ < θ0, then the superposition remains stable. When θ > θ0 the cohesive link between the monomers is broken and the upper monomer will bounce randomly following some of the green arrows and will attach itself to the z = 0 surface at a further point, thus fragmenting the aggregate. initial fractal dimensions according to the approximate relation- ships: DLCA (D f ≈ 1.8), RLCA (D f ≈ 2.1), DLPA (D f ≈ 2.5) and RLPA (D f ≈ 3). The values were calculated using the well known self-similarity properties of fractals whereby the num- ber, Nm, of monomers constituting the aggregate located within a sphere of radius R follows Nm ∝ RD f , where R is smaller than the gyration radius of the aggregate. The gyration radius of a frac- tal aggregate is a measure of the extent of the aggregate, akin to the standard deviation of the monomers' distance to the centre of mass of the aggregate and can be calculated by (ri − r j)2 = 1 N (ri − rc)2 (1) ×(cid:88) i, j R2 g = 1 2N ×(cid:88) i where N is the number of monomers in the aggregate, ri and r j are the spatial coordinates of the center of the monomers i and j, and rc corresponds to the spatial coordinates of the center of mass of the aggregate (Jullien & Botet 1987). A representa- tion of each of the four aggregate types is given in Fig. 3. These aggregates may correspond to different types of cometary parti- cles as ejected from the surface of the nucleus by gas pressure. For each aggregate type, 1000 different aggregation simulations were performed to statistically analyze the results. In a second step, simulating the particle collection and flat- tening observed by COSIMA during the Rosetta mission, the aggregates are projected monomer by monomer onto the plane z = 0 as shown in Fig. 4. The monomers are selected iteratively by increasing z values. If a monomer is projected directly onto the plane z = 0 without encountering any other monomer, it sticks directly to the collision plane. In the case where it encoun- ters a monomer that is previously stuck under it, we consider that a bond exists between the two monomers and that it will be bro- ken if EVdW < Ek where EVdW is the van der Waals energy and Ek is the kinetic energy of the incoming particle. This condition can be written as in Eq (2) considering van der Waals interac- Article number, page 4 of 9 J. Lasue et al.: Flattened loose particles compared to Rosetta f o r e b m u n n i n e v i g s i e l a c s A . s e l c i t r a p d e n e t t a fl e h t f o y g o l o h p r o m e h t n o n o i s e h o c d n o b d n a ) f D ( . ) n e e r g = z , d e r = y , e u l b = x ( s w o r r a d e r o l o c y b d e t a c i d n i s i e m a r f l a i t n e r e f e r a d n a , s r e m o n o m y g o l o h p r o m e l c i t r a p l a i t i n i f o t c e ff e e h t g n i s i r a m m u s e r u g i F . 5 . g i F and increase the relative height of the flattened aggregate. These columns of monomers appear due to the increased strength of the bonds between the monomers, forming chain-like vertical struc- tures that are not broken by the flattening geometry (as θ0 > θ over the monomers' column). We therefore see that both param- eters (D f and θ0) influence significantly the outcome of the sim- ulated projection. Fig. 6 shows the resulting projections in the case where the monomers have a non-zero probability to bounce back to space due to mass loss processes. In this case we only consider RLPA aggregates with different Ploss values ranging from 0% to 50%. As the mass loss probability gets larger, only a flat footprint of the aggregate remains with a very low aspect ratio which can represent the results of the low speed laboratory aggregate stick- Article number, page 5 of 9 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Lasue_agg_Rosetta_rev2_final Fig. 7. Illustration of the connected area calculated for a flattened ag- gregate of type RLCA. The flattened particles seen from above is shown on the left. The calculated connected areas are shown with gaps in the middle and without gaps on the right. The parts of the aggregate that are not connected to the largest connected aggregate are removed from the processing. Fig. 6. 3D view of a RLPA aggregate after projection with different mass loss. A scale is given in number of monomers, and a referential frame is indicated by colored arrows (x=blue, y=red, z=green) with an approximate 30◦ viewing angle. ing experiments of Ellerbroek et al. (2017) where most of the initial aggregate mass was lost. Such mass loss processes may also be at work during the COSIMA particle collection. 3. Results 3.1. Data Analysis The aggregate flattening simulations were run to create 1000 ag- gregates of each of the four types, using 10,000 monomers each, for the four fractal dimensions considered, with the sin(θ0) pa- rameter ranging from 1 to 10−6 and with a Ploss probability of mass loss ranging from 0 to 0.5. This was done in order to ob- tain good statistics for the aspect ratio of each numerically flat- tened aggregate for comparison to the COSIMA measurements. The height, H, of the flattened aggregates is the maximum value of z among all the sticking monomers. To compute the area, A, we considered only the monomers visible from above (looking towards the −z direction) and, based on their position, we cal- culated the contour of the projected connected set of monomers (Lorensen & Cline 1987). We computed two different connected areas: one with gaps and one without gaps as Fig. 7 shows. The area with gaps is always somewhat smaller than the area with- out gaps but is essentially linearly correlated with it. Therefore, we calculated the results based on the connected area without gaps. In this way, we can calculate a statistical distribution of A, for particles of each kind similar to the the aspect ratio, H/ procedure used with the COSIMA data and assess the effect of the different parameters on the morphology of the flattened ag- gregates. √ 3.2. The morphologies of flattened aggregates Figure 8 represents the density distribution of aspect ratios cal- culated for the 1000 flattened aggregates of each fractal type and for 4 different values of sin(θ0). The upper figure is calculated for a sin(θ0) = 1 corresponding to a simulation where no bond Article number, page 6 of 9 between monomers is broken (illustrated on the right hand side of the Figure 5). One can see that the distribution of aspect ratios overlaps between about 0.5 (relatively flat aggregates) and 1.3. The distribution also separates relatively well the different types of aggregates with the more compact aggregates of type PA hav- ing a median aspect ratio value of 1.18 (σ = 0.15) and the fluffier aggregates of type CA having a median aspect ratio value of 0.73 (σ = 0.22). Therefore, to first order, the process appears to sep- arate the aggregates with fractal dimensions above or below 2 into two groups. This is somewhat expected since more com- pact aggregates will present more opportunities for solid verti- cal structures of monomers to remain unbroken and to vertically extend the projected aggregate. One can also notice that the as- pect ratio distributions of the CA type aggregates present an ex- tended right wing showing that some of those aggregates could still have aspect ratios close to one, if their monomer bonds are strong compared to the energy of impact. As sin(θ0) decreases, the number of broken bonds increases and the projected aggregates get flatter. The minimum aspect ratio decreases and reaches 0.1 for values of sin(θ0) = 0.1 or lower. The distribution of the most compact particles (RLPA with D f ≈ 3) is now clearly separated from the distribution of the other aggregates and remains around 1, indicating that the surface dimensions covered by the flattened aggregate in x and y are of the same order of magnitude as its vertical extent in z. With respect to the distributions of the less compact aggregates, we notice that the distributions for CA aggregates with fractal di- mensions lower than about 2 become quickly undistinguishable. Those flattened aggregates would therefore present essentially the same aspect ratio distributions irrespective of their initial morphology. The DLPA aggregates that have a fractal dimen- sion around 2.5 are located in between those two extremes and clearly separated from them at low values of sin(θ0). For exam- ple, the standard deviation of the distributions for sin(θ0) = 0.25 range from 0.06 to 0.09. The DLPA distribution average aspect ratio is approximately 0.3 for sin(θ0) = 0.1 or lower. At values of sin(θ0) lower than 0.1, the density distributions stabilize to- wards their final values. One can also notice a bimodal density distribution for the flattened RLPA aggregates, corresponding to whether vertical columns of monomers appear within the pyra- mid somewhat extending its height. We expect the random size distributions of monomers in real dust aggregates to limit the as- pect ratio to the lower values of around 0.75-1.0. Some similar linear chain-like structures were also detected in the analysis of COSIMA particles, such as the 2CF Adeline particle (Hornung et al. 2016). The effect of the sin(θ0) parameter is further illustrated in Figure 9 where aspect ratio distributions of DLPA aggregates are J. Lasue et al.: Flattened loose particles compared to Rosetta Fig. 9. Distribution of aspect ratio, H/ different sin(θ0) without mass loss. √ A, for DLPA aggregates with calculated for different values of sin(θ0) ranging from 0.001 to 1 and are superposed. As the sin(θ0) value decreases, the aspect ra- tio decreases (due to the larger number of bonds breaking) from approximately 1 to 0.25. One can also notice that the standard deviation of the density distribution also decreases, indicating that most aggregates of this type flatten in the same way. This is related to the randomization of monomer deposition after bond breaking which reduces the range of vertical extent possible after flattening. Based on this figure, we can see that given a relatively narrow range of collection velocities, since equation 3 indicates that sin(θ0) is proportional to 1 V , a large range of bond cohesive strengths in the aggregates would lead to a larger range of aspect ratios for the same initial structure of the aggregate. This is espe- cially true of DLPA as the aspect ratios for these particles range from 0.25 to 1.2. Compact aggregate aspect ratios would range between 0.8 and 1.3, while aggregates with fractal dimensions around 2 and lower present aspect ratios ranging from 0.1 to 1. If the cohesive strength of monomer bonds in the aggregate are randomly distributed one can expect to detect more aggregates with small flattened aspect ratios than large flattened aspect ra- tios. Finally, the effect of the mass loss coefficient is illustrated in Figure 10 top where the probability density of aspect ratios for RLPA aggregates with sin(θ0) = 1 is calculated for mass loss parameters ranging from 0% to 50%. As expected, the mass loss parameter reduces the aspect ratio of the flattened aggregates be- cause of the loss of monomers. As compared to the variation in aspect ratio distribution for varying sin(θ0), one can notice that the end aspect ratio distribution remains relatively large (larger than 0.5) which is due to the simultaneous loss of monomers in all directions, so that the dimensions of the flattened aggregate are reduced in all dimensions at more or less the same rate (in x, y, and z). This parameter is also important in reducing the final aspect ratio of the flattened aggregates. In the case of DLPA aggregates and the more fluffy ones, the initial aggregate is so porous that even moderate mass loss de- stroys the structure during flattening. This leads rapidly to a very flat final projected structure as illustrated in Figure 10 bottom. It therefore appears that the initial fractal dimension of ag- gregates strongly affects the morphology of flattened aggregates, and that, depending on the effect of parameters such as the speed of collection, strength of bonds between the monomers and mass loss fraction, it may, or may not, be possible to distinguish the initial structure of the particle from their flattened morphologies. Article number, page 7 of 9 Fig. 8. Distribution of aspect ratio, H/ A, for 1000 aggregates of each type (RLCA, DLCA, RLPA, DLPA) with sin(θ0) ranging from 1 to 0.001 without mass loss. √ A&A proofs: manuscript no. Lasue_agg_Rosetta_rev2_final 2. the flattest kind of particles observed (shattered clusters with an aspect ratio around 0.15) could be consistent with com- paction of the smallest fractal dimension RLCA and DLCA aggregates or with a very large mass loss during collection (>50%). 3. the diversity of morphologies could also originate from a single type of aggregation process (such as DLPA) but pre- senting very different cohesive strengths amongst aggregates (sin(θ0) ranging from at least 0.1 to 1). This distribution would also present a peak around 0.3 as shown in Figure 9, which would be consistent with the peak of the COSIMA distribution around 0.3 as shown in Figure 2. 4. finally, a fourth process, described in Ellerbroek et al. (2017), may be playing a role here as well. Experiments show that incoming aggregates may sometimes fragment upon impact, leaving some remains sticking to the target in a pyramidal shape (mass transfer property between 0 and 0.8). The diversity of aspect ratios observed appears consistent with at least two families of aggregates with different D f , which would also be consistent with the GIADA and MIDAS measure- ments of two dust particles populations with very different frac- tal dimensions, one being close to 3 and the other around 1.8 (Fulle & Blum 2017; Mannel et al. 2016)). Variations in both the cohesive strength of the particles and the speed of collection may play a role in the continuity of the higher aspect ratio range (>0.3) detected by COSIMA. Alternatively, this could also mean that the initial low fractal dimensions have been somewhat al- tered by internal processes, such as compaction, or temperature alteration, such as sintering, which may have happened during the evolution of the cometary nucleus, especially on its surface. Fig. 10. Distribution of aspect ratio, H/ A, for RLPA aggregates (top) and DLPA aggregates (bottom) with sin(θ0) = 1 and different mass loss probability coefficients. √ 4. Discussion 4.1. Comparison with COSIMA observations The aspect ratio variation with initial D f (aggregate type), sin(θ0) and Ploss can be compared with the values observed by COSISCOPE and presented in Fig. 2. On the one hand, only the PA aggregate types have an aspect ratio large enough to explain the presence of the compact particles in the COSIMA aspect ra- tio distribution. This implies that a population of particles with fractal dimension between 2.5 and 3 must be present in the dis- tribution of particles ejected by 67P. On the other hand, in order to explain the presence of mor- phologies with aspect ratios as low as 0.1 to 0.3, where the dis- tributions of COSIMA particles of type G, R and S peak, other types of particles or processes need to be invoked. From our sim- ulations, even with a mass loss as large as 50%, RLPA aggregates alone cannot explain the range of aspect ratio observed. How- ever, the DLPA type particles could reach aspect ratio values as low as 0.2 either with different cohesive strengths and/or veloc- ities (sin(θ0)) or with mass losses up to 50%. Finally, a fractal dimension lower than 2 would also lead to very low final as- pect ratios even when considering particles with higher cohesive strengths. The large range of distribution observed by COSIMA could therefore be explained by: 1. two different initial groups of particles with low and high fractal dimensions (such as RLPA for the compact particles and DLPA for the shattered clusters). Article number, page 8 of 9 4.2. Comparison with collision experiments In the work of Ellerbroek et al. (2017), laboratory simulations of impacts of aggregates simulating the particle collection proce- dure of Rosetta were presented. The aggregates were formed by aggregation of irregular polydisperse SiO2 particles with density around 2.6 kg m−3 and a size range of 0.1 to 10 µm. The final aggregates have porosities around 65% ± 5% and low compres- sive strength between 1 × 104 Pa and 1 × 106 Pa. The aggregates were then accelerated by electrostatic forces towards a collecting plane where the collision was filmed and the resulting flattened footprint imaged and analyzed. The velocity of impact ranges from about 1 m s−1 to 6 m s−1. The footprints obtained represent the diversity of morpholo- gies that were acquired by the COSIMA instrument. At very low velocities of around 1 m s−1, the aggregates either stick directly to the surface, similar to the compact COSIMA particle type, or they may bounce from the surface, leaving a very flat foot- print with mostly unconnected fragments, possibly morphologi- cally similar to the shattered cluster COSIMA type of particles. As velocities are increased from 2 m s−1 to 6 m s−1, the particles mostly stick to the surface and fragmentation occurs, leading to footprints morphologically similar to COSIMA rubble piles or glued clusters. In this laboratory work, all morphologies were generated us- ing only a change in the impact velocity and impactor size, and similarities could be seen between the footprints of the parti- cles that were obtained on the collecting surface and the mor- phologies measured by COSIMA. The simulations presented in our work allow us to generate similar conditions of flattening by varying the velocity and the particles sizes. However, in our sim- ulations, we can also modify the initial impacting particle mor- phology and study its effect on the flattening of the aggregates. J. Lasue et al.: Flattened loose particles compared to Rosetta This allows us to explore an extended set of parameters com- pared with the laboratory experiments, and we have shown that it is also possible to generate the measured footprint morphology by considering different initial fractal dimensions of the impact- ing particles, as discussed above. It would be of interest to study in the laboratory how very porous particles behave when sub- jected to the type of collection that happened during the Rosetta mission to confirm our analysis. 4.3. Possible analysis of MIDAS data A planned future study aims to investigate whether these results are also valid for MIDAS particles. The aspect ratios of dust par- ticles collected by MIDAS should be calculated and their distri- bution reviewed. It will be of great interest if the distribution falls in different groups, and if they match those found in the simu- lation and with COSIMA particles. As MIDAS particles are one order of magnitude smaller than those of COSIMA, this will al- low us to understand how the initial structures of dust particles of comet 67P might look and if they remain similar over the 1 µm to 100 µm size range. 5. Conclusions In this work, we have shown that simple numerical simulations of aggregate flattening can be used to infer the initial proper- ties of particles collected by COSIMA on-board Rosetta. The diversity of aspect ratios measured in COSIMA images appears consistent with several hypotheses on the initial properties of the collected particles. 1. It could be explained by at least two families of aggregates with different fractal dimensions D f . A mixture of some compact particles with fractal dimensions close to 2.5-3 to- gether with some fluffier ones with fractal dimensions <2 would also be consistent with the observations and the mea- surements made by GIADA and MIDAS (Fulle & Blum 2017; Mannel et al. 2016). 2. Alternatively, the distribution of morphologies seen by COSIMA could originate from a single type of aggregation process, such as DLPA (D f ≈ 2.5) but presenting a large range of cohesive strengths or collection velocities. This dis- tribution would be consistent with a maximum at an as- pect ratio around 0.3 as observed on the COSIMA typol- ogy (Langevin et al. 2016). Furthermore, variations in cohesive strength and velocity may play a role in the higher aspect ratio range detected by COSIMA (>0.3). Our work allows us to explain the particle morphologies observed by COSIMA and those generated by the laboratory ex- periments of Ellerbroek et al. (2017) in a consistent framework. Taken together with the observations made by GIADA and MI- DAS on Rosetta, our simulations seem to favor an interpreta- tion based on two different families of dust particles with sig- nificantly distinct fractal dimensions ejected from the cometary nucleus. Acknowledgements. The authors acknowledge two anonymous referees for their positive evaluation and constructive comments. The authors acknowledge sup- port from Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) in the realization of in- struments devoted to space exploration of comets and in their scientific analysis. T.M. acknowledges funding by the Austrian Science Fund FWF P 28100-N36. References Bentley, M. S., Schmied, R., Mannel, T., et al. 2016, Nature, 537, 73 625 Bertini, I., Gutierrez, P. J., & Sabolo, W. 2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 504, Blum, J. 2000, Space Science Reviews, 92, 265 Blum, J., Gundlach, B., Krause, M., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, S755 Blum, J. & Wurm, G. 2008, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 46, 21 Burchell, M. J., Fairey, S. A., Wozniakiewicz, P., et al. 2008, Meteoritics & Plan- Colangeli, L., Lopez-Moreno, J. J., Palumbo, P., et al. 2007, Space Science Re- Davidsson, B. J. R., Sierks, H., Guettler, C., et al. 2016, Astronomy & Astro- etary Science, 43, 23 views, 128, 803 physics, 592, A63 Dominik, C. & Tielens, A. 1997, The Astrophysical Journal, 480, 647 Ellerbroek, L. E., Gundlach, B., Landeck, A., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, S204 Fulle, M. & Blum, J. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Fulle, M., Della Corte, V., Rotundi, A., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Fulle, M., Della Corte, V., Rotundi, A., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal 469, S39 Astronomical Society, 469, S45 Letters, 802, L12 Fulle, M., Levasseur-Regourd, A. C., McBride, N., & Hadamcik, E. 2000, The Astronomical Journal, 119, 1968 Fulle, M., Marzari, F., Della Corte, V., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, Güttler, C., Mannel, T., Rotundi, A., et al. submitted, Astronomy & Astrophysics Hamaker, H. C. 1937, physica, 4, 1058 Hornung, K., Merouane, S., Hilchenbach, M., et al. 2016, Planetary and Space 821, 19 Science, 133, 63 Hörz, F., Bastien, R., Borg, J., et al. 2006, science, 314, 1716 Israelachvili, J. N. 2011, Intermolecular and surface forces (Academic press) Jullien, R. & Botet, R. 1987, Ann. Telecomm., 41, 343 Kempf, S., Pfalzner, S., & Henning, T. K. 1999, Icarus, 141, 388 Kimura, H. 2001, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, Kissel, J., Altwegg, K., Clark, B. C., et al. 2007, Space Science Reviews, 128, 70, 581 823 Langevin, Y., Hilchenbach, M., Ligier, N., et al. 2016, Icarus, 271, 76 Langevin, Y., Hilchenbach, M., Vincendon, M., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, S535 Lasue, J., Levasseur-Regourd, A. C., Hadamcik, E., & Alcouffe, G. 2009, Icarus, 199, 129 reviews, 214, 64 Science, 56, 1719 Levasseur-Regourd, A.-C., Agarwal, J., Cottin, H., et al. 2018, Space science Levasseur-Regourd, A.-C., Zolensky, M., & Lasue, J. 2008, Planetary and Space Lorensen, W. E. & Cline, H. E. 1987, in ACM siggraph computer graphics, Vol. 21 (ACM), 163 -- 169 Mannel, T., Bentley, M. S., Schmied, R., et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, stw2898 Meakin, P. 1991, Reviews of Geophysics, 29, 317 Merouane, S., Zaprudin, B., Stenzel, O., et al. 2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Riedler, W., Torkar, K., Jeszenszky, H., et al. 2007, Space Science Reviews, 128, 596, A87 869 Rotundi, A., Sierks, H., Della Corte, V., et al. 2015, Science, 347, aaa3905 Weidenschilling, S. J. 1997, Icarus, 127, 290 Wurm, G. & Blum, J. 1998, Icarus, 132, 125 Article number, page 9 of 9

Subsets and Splits